OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Palestine Exploration Fund - Quarterly Statement for 1894/Notes on the Skull Hill, &c.

NOTES BY THE REV. J. E. HANAUER.
I.
I have ascertained that the name "El Heidhemiyeh," given by the natives to Jeremiah's Grotto and the Skull Hill, is not, as has been supposed, a corruption of 'El Heiremiyeh,' the place of Jeremiah ("Tent Work," Edition 1879, vol. i, p. 373), but a corruption of "El Adhamiyeh," الادهمية‎, which means the place of "El Adham." It is so called because it is a "zawieh," زاوية‎, or chapel of the dervishes of the Order founded by the celebrated Sheikh Ibrahim el Adham, of Damascus, whose date, according to Hughes' "Dictionary of Islam," is a.h. 161, i.e., about A.D. 777. The "Zawieh el Adhamiyeh" at Jeremiah's Grotto was, according to Mejir ed Din, A.D. 1490 (Uns ul Jelil, Arabic, Cairo edition, vol. ii, p. 412), built by the Emir Maujak, the Nayib (Viceroy or Lieutenant) of Damascus, and was endowed by him and others.
II.
I would ask leave to retract the statement I made on pp. 298, 307, and 308 of the Quarterly Statement for 1892 that the mediæval cemetery near St. Stephen's seems, from the inscriptions on the tombstones of the deacons Nonnus and Onesimus, to have been known as that "of the Holy Resurrection (Anastasis) of Christ." That this was not the case is now clear from an inscription recently discovered and published since my "Notes on the Controversy respecting the Site of Calvary" were written. The inscription I refer to was found on the Russian property near Gethsemane. It is the epitaph of two porters "of the Holy Anastasis of Christ." Those whom it interests may read text and translation on p. 568 of the "Revue Biblique, 1892" (Paris, P. Lethielleux, 10, Rue Cassette).
III.
A Moslem is excavating considerably in the open ground east of Christ Church, Jerusalem. This morning he begged me to examine what he considered an inscribed stone, which he had just dug up at a depth of about 10 feet below the surface. To my eye the supposed letters look like tool marks, but I send a squeeze, as it may prove to be something more.
# Of Englishe Dogges/Corrigenda

¶ Faultes escaped thus to b'amended.
In the last page of the Epistle Dedicatory, Quæ for Qui.
Other faultes we referre to the correction of the Reader.
There bee also Accents wanting in the Greeke words which, because we had them not, are pretermitted; so haue wee byn fayne to let the Greeke words run their full length, for lacke of Abbreuiations.
Studio & industriæ,
Abrahami Flemingi.
# Of Englishe Dogges/Index

An Alphabeticall Index, declaring the whole discourse of this abridgement. The number importeth the Page.
The ende of the Index.
# Pampanga Sugar Mills v. Trinidad

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
279 U.S. 211
Pampanga Sugar Mills v. Trinidad
Argued: March 1, 1929. --- Decided: April 8, 1929
Messrs. Louis Titus, of Washington, D. C., Quintin Paredes and Felipe Buencamino, Jr., both of Manila, Philippine Islands, and Oscar Sutro, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from page 212 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Wm. Cattron Rigby, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pambo

Layout 2
Suppose that we part (work done, comes play)
 With a grave tale told in crambo
— As our hearty sires were wont to say —
 Whereof the hero is Pambo?
Do you happen to know who Pambo was?
 Nor I — but this much have heard of him:
He entered one day a college-class,
 And asked — was it so absurd of him? —
"May Pambo learn wisdom ere practise it?
 In wisdom I fain would ground me:
Since wisdom is centred in Holy Writ,
 Some psalm to the purpose expound me!"
"That psalm," the Professor smiled, "shall be
 Untroubled by doubt which dirtieth
Pellucid streams when an ass like thee
 Would drink there — the Nine-and-thirtieth.
"Verse First: I said I will look to my ways
 That I with my tongue offend not.
How now? Why stare? Art struck in amaze?
 Stop, stay! The smooth line hath an end knot!
"He's gone! — disgusted my text should prove
 Too easy to need explaining?
Had he waited, the blockhead might find I move
 To matter that pays remaining!"
Long years went by, when — "Ha, who's this?
 Do I come on the restive scholar
I had driven to Wisdom's goal, I wis,
 But that he slipped the collar?
"What? Arms crossed, brow bent, thought-immersed?
 A student indeed! Why scruple
To own that the lesson proposed him first
 Scarce suited so apt a pupil?
"Come back! From the beggarly elements
 To a more recondite issue
We pass till we reach, at all events,
 Some point that may puzzle . . . Why 'pish' you?"
From the ground looked piteous up the head;
 "Daily and nightly, Master,
Your pupil plods thro' that text you read,
 Yet gets on never the faster.
"At the self-same stand, — now old, then young!
 I will look to my ways — were doing
As easy as saying! — that I with my tongue
 Offend not — and 'scape pooh-poohing
"From sage and simple, doctor and dunce?
 Ah, nowise! Still doubts so muddy
The stream I would drink at once, — but once!
 That — thus I resume my study!"
 Brother, brother, I share the blame,
 Arcades sumus ambo!  Darkling, I keep my sunrise-aim,
 Lack not the critic's flambeau,
 And look to my ways, yet, much the same,
 Offend with my tongue — like Pambo!
# Pamphlet

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Pamphlet."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Pamphlet (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace)
* Pamphlets (Tolstoy)

## See also

* "Pamphlet" in An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language by Friedrich Kluge, translated by John Francis Davis (1891)
* "Pamphlets," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
# Peter Gynt

* "Peter Gynt" in Round the Yule Log (1881)
* "Peter Gynt" in Christmas Fireside Stories: Norwegian Folk & Fairy Tales (1923)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Peter Pan; or, the Boy Who Would Not Grow Up

This play was first published in 1928, although it was first performed in 1904.
Layout 2
The Uniform Edition of The Plays of J. M. Barrie
Peter Pan Or The Boy Who Would Not Grow Up
[Advertisements]
THE WORKS OF J. M. BARRIE.
NOVELS, STORIES, PLAYS, AND SKETCHES.
Uniform Edition.
AULD LICHT IDYLLS, BETTER DEAD. WHEN A MAN’S SINGLE. A WINDOW IN THRUMS, AN EDINBURGH ELEVEN. THE LITTLE MINISTER. SENTIMENTAL TOMMY. MY LADY NICOTINE, MARGARET OGILVY. TOMMY AND GRIZEL. THE LITTLE WHITE BIRD. PETER AND WENDY.
Also
HALF HOURS, DER TAG. ECHOES OF THE WAR.
PLAYS.
Uniform Edition.
PETER PAN. MARY ROSE. DEAR BRUTUS. A KISS FOR CINDERELLA. ALICE SIT-BY-THE-FIRE. WHAT EVERY WOMAN KNOWS. QUALITY STREET. THE ADMIRABLE CRICHTON. ECHOES OF THE WAR. Containing: The Old Lady Shows Her Medals —The New Word—Barbara’s Wedding—A Well-Remembered Voice. HALF HOURS. Containing: Pantaloon—The Twelve-Pound Look—Rosalind—The Will
Others in Preparation.
INDIVIDUAL EDITIONS.
COURAGE. PETER PAN IN KENSINGTON GARDENS. Illustrated by Arthur Rackham. PETER AND WENDY. Illustrated by F. D. Bedford. PETER PAN AND WENDY. Illustrated by Miss Attwell. TOMMY AND GRIZEL. Illustrated by Bernard Partridge MARGARET OGILVY.
⁂ For particulars concerning The Thistle Edition of the Works of J. M. Barrie, sold only by subscription, send for circular.
NEW YORK: CHARLES SCRIBNER’S SONS
The Plays of J. M. Barrie
Peter Pan Or The Boy Who Would Not Grow Up
Charles Scribner’s Songs New York : : : : : : : : 1928
* Dedication v
* Act I 1
* Act II 45
* Act III 75
* Act IV 95
* Act V 123
Copyright, 1928, by
J. M. BARRIE
Printed in the United States of America
All rights reserved, under the International Copyright Act. Performance forbidden and right of representation reserved. Application for the right of performing this play must be made to Charles Frohman, Inc., Empire Theatre, New York.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1937, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 86 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Poe v. Ullman

Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 (1961), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge a Connecticut law that banned the use of contraceptives, and banned doctors from advising their use, because the law had never been enforced. Therefore, any challenge to the law was deemed unripe, because there was no actual threat of injury to anyone who disobeyed the law. The same statute would later be challenged yet again (successfully) in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965). Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Concurring Opinion

    Brennan

## Dissenting Opinions

    Douglas
    Harlan
    Stewart
United States Supreme Court
367 U.S. 497
Poe v. Ullman
Argued: March 1, 2, 1961. --- Decided: June 19, 1961
See 82 S.Ct. 21, 22.
Mr. Fowler V. Harper, New Haven, Conn., for appellants in both cases.
Mrs. Harriet Pilpel, New York City, for Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., as amicus curiae, in both cases.
Mr. Raymond J. Cannon, Hartford, Conn., for appellee in both cases.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER announced the judgment of the Court and an opinion in which THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Mr. Justice CLARK and Mr. Justice WHITTAKER join.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Poe v. Ullman/Concurrence Brennan

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Brennan
* Dissenting Opinions Douglas Harlan Stewart
* Wikipedia article
United States Supreme Court
367 U.S. 497
Poe v. Ullman
Argued: March 1, 2, 1961. --- Decided: June 19, 1961
Mr. Justice BRENNAN, concurring in the judgment.
I agree that this appeal must be dismissed for failure to present a real and substantial controversy which unequivocally calls for adjudication of the rights claimed in advance of any attempt by the State to curtail them by criminal prosecution. I am not convinced, on this skimpy record, that these appellants as individuals are truly caught in an inescapable dilemma. The true controversy in this case is over the opening of birth-control clinics on a large scale; it is that which the State has prevented in the past, not the use of contraceptives by isolated and individual married couples. It will be time enough to decide the constitutional questions urged upon us when, if ever, that real controversy flares up again. Until it does, or until the State makes a definite and concrete threat to enforce these laws against individual married couples-a threat which it has never made in the past except under the provocation of litigation-this Court may not be compelled to exercise its most delicate power of constitutional adjudication.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Poe v. Seaborn

United States Supreme Court
282 U.S. 101
Poe v. Seaborn
Argued: Nov. 24, 1930. ---
[Syllabus from pages 101-103 intentionally omitted]
The Attorney General and Mr. Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 103-105 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. George Donworth and Elmer E. Todd, both of Seattle, Wash., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 106-108 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Penry v. Lynaugh/Concurrence Stevens

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Stevens Scalia
* Wikipedia article
Justice STEVENS, with whom Justice BLACKMUN joins, concurring in part and dissenting in part.
As I stated in my separate opinion in Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 318-319, and n. 2, 109 S.Ct. 1060, 1080, n. 2, 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989), it is neither logical nor prudent to consider a rule's retroactive application before the rule itself is articulated. Nor am I at all sure that courts should decide the retroactivity issue if it was not raised below. Cf. Zant v. Moore, 489 U.S. 836, 837, 109 S.Ct. 1518, 1519, 103 L.Ed.2d 922 (1989) (BLACKMUN, J., dissenting). Finally, I do not support the Court's assertion, without benefit of argument or briefing on the issue, that Teague § retroactivity principles pertain to capital cases. Cf. Teague, 489 U.S., at 321, and n. 3, 109 S.Ct., at 1081, and n. 3 (STEVENS, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment). But assuming, arguendo, that those principles do apply, it is clear that the Court's discussion of the mitigating evidence question, with which I agree, does not establish a "new rule" as that term is used for retroactivity purposes. I thus join Parts I, II-B, and III.
In Part IV-A the Court decides that a rule that the Eighth Amendment prohibits the execution of a mentally retarded person ought to apply retroactively. Assuming retroactivity is pertinent, I agree that the first exception to Justice Harlan's nonretroactivity doctrine "should be understood to cover not only rules forbidding criminal punishment of certain primary conduct but also rules prohibiting a certain category of punishment for a class of defendants because of their status or offense," ante, at 330, and that this claim lies within that exception. #fn-s-1
The remaining sections of Part IV adequately and fairly state the competing arguments respecting capital punishment of mentally retarded persons. In my judgment, however, that explication particularly the summary of the arguments advanced in the Brief for American Association on Mental Retardation et al. as Amici Curiae, ante, at 336-337-compels the conclusion that such executions are unconstitutional. I would therefore reverse the judgme t of the Court of Appeals in its entirety.
# Penrose v. Hart

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
PENROSE verʃus HART.
O
which the Plaintiff had applied first to the discharge of the arrearages of interest; whereas he insisted, that it ought first to have been deducted from the principal debt.
But SHIPPEN, President, said, that the practice had been otherwise; and he though with great reason and propriety. He remember to have heard of an old decision when Logan was Chief Justice, in which it was expressly settled, that money paid on account of a bond, should first be applied to discharge the interest due at the time of the payment, and the residue, if any, credited towards satisfaction of the principal. By this rule, the Gentlemen of the Bar had uniformly governed their calculations before the Revolution.
Lewis, for the Plaintiff, insifted that the practice was the same at the present day, and appealed to the Attornies in Court, who confirmed his assertion.
# Penrod/front matter

page
# One Hundred Poems by Kabir/13

XIII
II. 37. aṅgaḍhiyā devā
O Lord Increate, who will serve Thee ?
Every votary offers his worship to the God of his own creation: each day he receives service—
None seek Him, the Perfect: Brahma, the Indivisible Lord.
They believe in ten Avatars; but no Avatar can be the Infinite Spirit, for he suffers the results of his deeds:
The Supreme One must be other than this.
The Yogi, the Sanyasi, the Ascetics, are disputing one with another:
Kabir says, "O brother ! he who has seen that radiance of love, he is saved."
# One Hundred Poems by Kabir/5

V
I. 63. avadhū, māyā tajī na jāy
Tell me, Brother, how can I renounce Maya ?
When I gave up the tying of ribbons, still I tied my garment about me:
When I gave up tying my garment, still I covered my body in its folds.
So, when I give up passion, I see that anger remains;
And when I renounce anger, greed is with me still;
And when greed is vanquished, pride and vainglory remain;
When the mind is detached and. casts Maya away, still it clings to the letter.
Kabir says, “ Listen to me, dear ​Sadhu ! the true path is rarely found.”
# One Hundred Poems by Kabir/2

II
I. 16. santan jāt na pūcho nirguṇiyāṉ
It is needless to ask of a saint the caste to which he belongs; ​
For the priest, the warrior, the tradesman, and all the thirty-six castes, alike are seeking for God.
It is but folly to ask what the caste of a saint may be;
The barber has sought God, the washerwoman, and the carpenter—
Even Raidas was a seeker after God.
The Rishi Swapacha was a tanner by caste.
Hindus and Moslems alike have achieved that End, where remains no mark of distinction.
# One Hundred Poems by Kabir/7

VII
I. 85. sādho, Brahm alakh lakhāyā
When He Himself reveals Himself, Brahma brings into manifestation That which can never be seen.
As the seed is in the plant, as the shade is in the tree, as the void is in the sky, as infinite forms are in the void—
So from beyond the Infinite, the Infinite comes; and from the Infinite the finite extends.
The creature is in Brahma, and Brahma is in the creature: they are ever distinct, yet ever united. ​He Himself is the tree, the seed, and the germ.
He Himself is the flower, the fruit, and the shade.
He Himself is the sun, the light, and the lighted.
He Himself is Brahma, creature, and Maya.
He Himself is the manifold form, the infinite space;
He is the breath, the word, and the meaning.
He Himself is the limit and the limitless: and beyond both the limited and the limitless is He, the Pure Being.
He is the Immanent Mind in Brahma and in the creature.
The Supreme Soul is seen within the soul,
The Point is seen within the Supreme Soul, ​
And within the Point, the reflection is seen again.
Kabir is blest because he has this supreme vision!
# One Hundred Poems by Kabir/16

XVI
II. 59. jānh cet acet khambh dōū
Between the poles of the conscious and the unconscious, there has the mind made a swing :
Thereon hang all beings and all worlds, and that swing never ceases its sway.
Millions of beings are there : the sun and the moon in their courses are there :
Millions of ages pass, and the swing goes on.
All swing ! the sky and the earth and the air and the water; and the Lord Himself taking form : ​
And the sight of this has made Kabir a servant.
# One Hundred Poems by Kabir/6

VI
I. 83. candā jhalkai yahi ghaṭ māhīn
The moon shines in my body, but my blind eyes cannot see it:
The moon is within me, and so is the sun.
The unstruck drum of Eternity is sounded within me; but my deaf ears cannot hear it.
So long as man clamours for the I and the Mine, his works are as naught:
When all love of the I and the Mine is dead, then the work of the Lord is done.
For work has no other aim than the getting of knowledge :
When that comes, then work is put away. ​
The flower blooms for the fruit: when the fruit comes, the flower withers.
The musk is in the deer, but it seeks it not within itself: it wanders in quest of grass.
# One Hundred Poems by Kabir/14

XIV
II. 56. dariyā kī lahar dariyāo hai jī
The river and its waves are one surf: where is the difference between the river and its waves ?
When the wave rises, it is the water; and when it falls, it is the same water again. Tell me, Sir, where is the distinction ?
Because it has been named as wave, shall it no longer be considered as water ?
Within the Supreme Brahma, the worlds are being told like beads:
Look upon that rosary with the eyes of wisdom.
# One Hundred Poems by Kabir/15

XV
II. 57. jānh khelat vasant ṛiturāj
Where Spring, the lord of the seasons, reigneth, there the Unstruck Music sounds of itself,
There the streams of light flow in all directions ;
Few are the men who can cross to that shore !
There, where millions of Krishnas stand with hands folded,
Where millions of Vishnus how their heads,
Where millions of Brahmās are reading the Vedas,
Where millions of Shivas are lost in contemplation,
Where millions of Indras dwell in the sky,
Where the demi-gods and the munis are unnumbered, ​
Where millions of Saraswatis, Goddess of Music, play on the vina—
There is my Lord self-revealed : and the scent of sandal and flowers dwells in those deeps.
# One Hundred Poems by Kabir/3

III
I. 57. sādho bhāī, jīvat hī karo āśā
O friend ! hope for Him whilst you live, know whilst you live, understand whilst you live: for in life deliverance abides. ​
If your bonds be not broken whilst living, what hope of deliverance in death ?
It is but an empty dream, that the soul shall have union with Him because it has passed from the body :
If He is found now, He is found then, If not, we do but go to dwell in the City of Death.
If you have union now, you shall have it hereafter.
Bathe in the truth, know the true Guru, have faith in the true Name !
Kabir says : “It is the Spirit of the quest which helps ; I am the slave of this Spirit of the quest.”
# One Hundred Poems by Kabir/4

IV
I. 58. bāgo nā jā re nā jā
Do not go to the garden of flowers!
O Friend! go not there ;
In your body is the garden of flowers. ​
Take your seat on the thousand petals of the lotus, and there gaze on the Infinite Beauty.
# Patients in mental institutions 1943

PATIENTS IN MENTAL INSTITUTIONS
1943
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
# Patients in mental institutions 1944

PATIENTS IN MENTAL INSTITUTIONS
1944
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
# Patients in mental institutions 1945

PATIENTS IN MENTAL INSTITUTIONS
1945
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
# Patriarcha
## Contents

* Letter by Peter Heylyn
* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Patriarcha/Letter

The COPY
OF A
LETTER
Written by the Late Learned
    SIR,
HOW great a Loss I had in the death of my most dear and honoured Friend, your deceased Father, no man is able to conjecture; but he that hath suffered in the like. So affable was his Conversation, his Discourse so rational, his Judgment so exact in most parts of Learning; and his Affections to the Church so exemplary in him, that I never enjoyed a greater Felicity in the company of any Man living, than I did in his. In which Respects I may affirm both with Safety and Modesty, that we did not only take Sweet Counsel together; but walked in the House of God as Friends: I must needs say, I was prepared for that great Blow, by the Loss of my Preferment in the Church of Westminster, which gave me the Opportunity of so dear and beloved a Neighbourhood; so that I lost him partly before he died, which made the Misery the more supportable, when I was deprived of him for altogether. But I was never more sensible of the Infelicity, than I am at this present, in reference to that Satisfaction, which I am sure he could have given the Gentleman whom I am to deal with: His eminent Abilities in these Political Disputes, exemplified in his Judicious Observations upon Aristotles Politiques; as also in some passages on Grotius, Hunton, Hobbs, and other of our late Discoursers about Forms of Government, declare abundantly how fit a Man he might have been to have dealt in this cause, which I would not willingly should be betrayed by unskilful handling: And had he pleased to have suffered his Excellent Discourse called Patriarcha to appear in Publick, it would have given such satisfaction to all our great Masters in the Schools of Politie, that all other Tractates in that kind, had been found unnecessary.
       Vide Certamen Epistolare. 386.