OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Public Law 111-112

Note: This is the original legislation as it was initially enacted. Any subsequent amendments hosted on Wikisource may be listed using What Links Here.
An Act To extend the authority for relocation expenses test programs for Federal employees, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

#### Section 1. Relocation Expenses Test Programs.

    (a) In General.—
       Section 5739 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
          (1) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (3);
          (2) in subsection (b)—
                (A) by inserting ‘‘or extended’’ after ‘‘approved’’; and
                (B) by inserting ‘‘or extension’’ after ‘‘of the program’’;
          (3) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following:
       ``(c)(1) An agency authorized to conduct a test program under subsection (a) shall annually submit a report on the results of the program to date to the Administrator.
          ``(2) Not later than 3 months after completion of a test program, the agency conducting the program shall submit a final report on the results of the program to the Administrator and the appropriate committees of Congress.´´;
          (4) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘10’’ and inserting ‘‘12’’; and
          (5) by striking subsection (e) and inserting the following:
       ``(e)(1) The Administrator may not approve any test program for an initial period of more than 4 years.
          ``(2)(A) Upon the request of the agency administering a test program, the Administrator may extend the program.
             ``(B) An extension under subparagraph (A) may not exceed 4 years.
             ``(C) The Administrator may exercise more than 1 extension under subparagraph (A) with respect to any test program.´´.
    (b) Effective Date.—
       This section shall take effect on December 18, 2009.
Approved November 30, 2009.

## Legislative History

* S. 1825
   * CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
   ** Nov. 9, considered and passed Senate.
   ** Nov. 16, considered and passed House.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# A Practical Grammar of the Latin Language/Abbreviations
## Abbreviations

Cf.—confer, compare.
Compos.—compositum, compound, or composita, compounds.
e.g.—exempli gratia, for example.
i.e.—id est, that is to say.
The asterisk (*) before a word shows it to be of modern origin, or applied to a modern object.
# A Practical Grammar of the Latin Language/Changelog
## Message from the Editors

In transcribing Adler's Grammar to this modern medium, we have taken upon ourselves to emend errata, whether typographical or conventional, as well as to add data that is often absent in the original work (such as macrons, &c.)
When an alteration consists of more than the rectification of a typographical error, such as consistently changing the spelling of a word throughout the work (e.g. pīleus to pilleus, coelum to caelum), we will note the change at the first instance.
There is to be found in the material some information which may be misleading, and then some which is false. This will be noted as it occurs, and counterpoints will be given as we see fit.
# Representative women of New England/Sarah S. Windsor

​SARAH SWEET WINDSOR, M.D., is a native of Rhode Island, being the daughter of Benjamin Angell and Sarah (Sweet) Windsor, of Smithfield, that State. On the paternal side she is descended from Joshua Windsor, who came to this country from England at an early date, and was one of the thirteen signers of the civil compact adopted at the town meeting held in Providence, August 20, 1637, the year after the settlement was begun; and she is also descended from Roger Williams, the founder of Rhode Island, through his daughter Mercy, who in 1677, as the widow of Resolved Waterman, became the wife of Samuel$^2$ Winsor, Joshua Winsor's only son.
Dr. Windsor obtained her early education in the public schools of Providence. In 1885 she received her medical degree from the Boston University, graduating as speaker of her class. She spent one year as house phy​sician at the Massachusetts Homoeopathic Hospital, and in 1886 went abroad for study and hospital work in Vienna. Returning to Boston in 1887,. she began practice, being soon after appointed assistant in obstetrics at the Boston University School of Medicine. In 1889 she entered the College of Liberal Arts, and four years later received her degree of A.B.
Dr. Windsor was the first woman president of the Boston Homœopathic Medical Society, attaining that distinction in 1899. In 1902 came another recognition of her ability: she was then appointed as one of the staff at the Massachusetts Homœopathic Hospital, being the first woman to receive such an appointment for a full term of service. She is one of the directors and a member of the College Club of Boston. At present she is obstetrician to the maternity department of the Massachusetts Homœopathic Hospital and associate professor of obstetrics at the Boston University Medical School.
# Royal Naval Biography/Louis, Charles Belfield

Layout 2
CHARLES BELFIELD LOUIS, Esq. [Commander.]
Youngest son of the late Rear-Admiral Sir Thomas Louis, Bart., K.F.M., &c., and brother to the present Captain Sir John Louis, Bart., one of H.M. naval aides-de-camp.
This officer was educated at the Royal Naval College, made a lieutenant in Aug. 1811; and promoted to the rank of commander on the 12th Aug. 1819. He married, in 1825, Mary, eldest daughter of the Rev. P. Mallock, of Cockington Court, co. Devon.
# Royal Naval Biography/Longchamp, John

Layout 2
JOHN LONGCHAMP, Esq. [Commander.]
Obtained his first commission on the 5th Dec. 1806. During the latter part of the French war, he was senior lieutenant of the Tyrian sloop. Commander Augustus Baldwin. In Oct. 1814, he was appointed to the Boyne 98, Captain (now Sir Frederick L.) Maitland, fitting out for the Halifax station. He subsequently commanded the Watchful revenue cutter. He was promoted to his present rank on the 26th Dec. 1822; and appointed an inspecting commander of the coast guard, Feb. 28th, 1823.
# Royal Naval Biography/Losack, George

Layout 2
GEORGE LOSACK, Esq Vice-Admiral of the Red.
This officer commanded the Termagant sloop, on the Leeward Island station, at the conclusion of the American war; and was promoted to the rank of Post-Captain, Nov. 22, 1790.
On the 12th April, 1796, he sailed for the Cape of Good Hope, in the Jupiter of 50 guns, and was present at the capture of the Dutch fleet in Saldanha Bay, in the month of Aug. following.
Early in 1799, on the demise of Sir Hugh C. Christian, Captain Losack succeeded to the command of the squadron on that station, and continued to act as Commodore until the arrival of the late Sir Roger Curtis, who for a short time hoisted his flag in the Jupiter; and that ship being in a very leaky state, he determined, instead of sending her to the East Indies, where her repairs would have cost an immense sum, to make the experiment whether it was not possible to refit her at the Cape; she was accordingly hove down and put in perfect repair in Simon’s Bay; thus was accomplished an object of considerable importance to the Navy, and which reflected high credit on all those concerned. The Cape of Good Hope had never before been used, either by the Dutch or British, as a place to repair at, nor was it supposed that a large ship could be hove down there.
​The colony being restored to the Batavian government by the treaty of Amiens, Sir Roger Curtis, after its evacuation, returned to England in the Diomede, accompanied by the Jupiter, and some other ships of war. On entering the Channel he heard of the renewal of hostilities from an American, and soon after the squadron captured a French ship from the Mauritius, with a valuable cargo.
Captain Losack afterwards commanded the Prince George, of 98 guns, in the Channel fleet. He was advanced to the rank of Rear-Admiral, April 24, 1808; and became a Vice-Admiral, 4th Dec. 1813.
Our officer was married on board the Jupiter, when on the Cape station, and has had several children.
# Royal Naval Biography/Louis, John

Layout 2
SIR JOHN LOUIS Bart. [Post-Captain of 1806.]
Eldest Bon of the late Rear-Admiral Sir Thomas Louis, Bart., K.F.M., &c., by Jacquetta Belfield, a lady of very respectable connexions in the west of England.
This officer was made a Commander, by Nelson, early in 1805; and his post commission bears date Jan. 22, 1806. During the latter part of the late war, he commanded l’Aigle frigate, on the Mediterranean station. The principal services in which he participated have been described in our memoirs of Captain John Tower, Rear-Admiral Moubray, C.B., and Sir James Brisbane; the latter of whom, when reporting the capture and destruction of a French convoy at Port Maurice, expressed himself as follows:–
“I feel great pleasure in declaring how much I am indebted to Sir John Louis and Captain Coghlan for the manner in which they placed their ships, and for the precision of their fire; but their characters are so well known, as well as the high state of discipline of their ships, that any encomium from me is unnecessary.”
Sir John Louis married, 15th Oct. 1807, the eldest daughter of Lieutenant-Colonel Kirkpatrick, Commandant of the 8th regiment of Bengal Native Infantry. His youngest brother, Charles Belfield Louis, is a Commander R.N.
Agent.– A. C. Marsh, Esq.
* ↑ Sir Thomas Louis died on board his flag-ship, the Canopus, at Alexandria, in Egypt, May 17, 1807; his remains were interred at Malta, by the side of the gallant Abercrombie. An interesting memoir of this distinguished Admiral will be found in the Nav. Chron. Vol. XVI. pp. 177–193.
* ↑ May 20th, 21st, and 28th, 1813; Aug. in the same year; and April 11th, 1814. – See Vol. II, p. 898; Vol. I. p. 812; and Vol, II. p. 409.
# Royal Naval Biography/Molineux, James

Layout 2
JAMES MOLINEUX, Esq. [Commander.]
Obtained his first commission in 1794; and served as a lieutenant of the Defence 74, Captain John Peyton, at the ​memorable battle of the Nile; and of the Windsor Castle 98, Captain Charles Boyles, in Sir Robert Calder’s action with the combined fleets of France and Spain, July 22d. 1805. We next find him flag-lieutenant to Rear-Admiral Thomas Wells, at Sheerness, where he continued from the end of 1808 until promoted to the rank of commander, May 4th, 1810. The out-pension of Greenwich Hospital was granted to him in Nov. 1827.
# Royal Naval Biography/Mitchell, Nathaniel

Layout 2
NATHANIEL MITCHELL, Esq. [Post-Captain of 1814.]
A son of the late Admiral Sir Andrew Mitchell, K.B. whose services are recorded in the Naval Chronicle, vol. 16, pp. 90–107. He was made lieutenant May 22, 1807; commander April 5, 1810; and post-captain June 7, 1814. His brothers, Charles and Andrew, are both captains, R.N.
# Royal Naval Biography/Mitford, Robert

Layout 2
ROBERT MITFORD, Esq. [Post-Captain of 1813.]
Was made lieutenant in Jan. 1802; commander Feb. 16, 1807; and post-captain Mar. 31, 1813. He commanded the Espoir brig, of 18 guns, at the capture of the islands of Ischia and Procida, in 1809; and on the 4th April, 1810, his boats assisted at the destruction of two settees, laden with oil, near the town of Castiglione: a few days afterwards, they also helped to destroy two sloops, with cargoes, in the bay of Naples.
On the 26th of the same month, the Espoir arrived off Terrecino, in company with the Spartan and Success frigates, commanded by Captains Jahleel Brenton, and John Ayscough. Four square-rigged vessels and several feluccas being discovered there at anchor under a castle, the boats of the squadron were immediately detached to attack them, and Captain Mitford, “with great energy and judgment,” ran in and sounded under the various batteries. Shortly afterwards the Spartan and her consorts brought up, and commenced a brisk cannonade; while the boats, under the orders of Lieutenants William Augustus Baumgardt, and George Rose Sartorious, in the face of a heavy fire, gallantly boarded a ship mounting 6 guns, which was obstinately defended by her crew; they also obtained possession of three barks, and brought off their four prizes with no greater loss than one man killed and two seamen wounded.
Captain Mitford subsequently commanded the Minstrel 24, on the Mediterranean station.
Agents.– Messrs. Chard.
* ↑ See Suppl. Part I. pp. 89–92.
* ↑ See id. p. 131, et seq.
# Royal Naval Biography/Moberly, John

Layout 2
JOHN MOBERLY, Esq. [Post-Captain of 1815.]
Received his first commission, Oct. 14, 1807; and was senior lieutenant of the Little Belt in her memorable rencontre ​with the U.S. ship President, May 16, 1811; on which occasion he conducted himself as “a most excellent officer, in every respect.” He was made commander, May 29, 1813; and promoted to post rank, Aug. 26, 1815.
# Royal Naval Biography/Minchin, William

Layout 2
WILLIAM MINCHIN, Esq. [Commander.]
Brother to Mr. T. A. Minchin, Solicitor at Portsea, was made a lieutenant in Dec. 1796; and wounded on board the Monarch 74, Captain James Robert Mosse, at the battle of Copenhagen, April 2d, 1801. His commission as commander bears date July 19th, 1821.
# Royal Naval Biography/Mitchell, Charles

Layout 2
CHARLES MITCHELL, Esq. [Post-Captain of 1825.]
Eldest son of the late Admiral Sir Andrew Mitchell, K.B. whose services are recorded in the Nav. Chron. XVI. 90–107; and brother to Captains Nathaniel and Andrew Mitchell, R.N.
​We first find this officer serving as an acting lieutenant on board the Cleopatra frigate. Captain Sir Robert Laurie, Bart, in her gallant but unsuccessful action with la Ville de Milan, a French ship of nearly double her size and force, Feb. 17th, 1805; on which occasion he was badly wounded. He obtained the rank of lieutenant Aug. 11th, 1806; and that of commander May 24th, 1811. His subsequent appointments were, – July 27th, 1813, to the Griper sloop, of 12 guns; – Feb. 7th, 1814, to the Savage 16; from which vessel he was removed, on the 28th of the same month, to the Espiegle 16; – and, April 9th, 1823, to the Slaney 20, fitting out for the East India station. In May, 1824, he assisted at the reduction of the island of Cheduba, by a detachment from the Rangoon expedition, under the command of Brigadier Michael M‘Creagh. His commission as captain bears date, April 8th, 1825.
Agent.– T. Collier, Esq.
* ↑ See Vol. I. Part II. p. 834, et seq.
* ↑ See “Naval Operations in Ava,” Chap. I. pp. 4, 13, et seq.
# Royal Naval Biography/Mingay, William James

Layout 2
WILLIAM JAMES MINGAY, Esq. [Post-Captain of 1821.]
We first find this officer serving as midshipman of the Magnificent 74, Captain William Henry Jervis, when that ship was wrecked near Brest, Mar. 25, 1804. He obtained the rank of lieutenant, July 6, 1805; and served on shore with the naval brigade, under Captain Byng (now Viscount Torrington), at the capture of the Cape of Good Hope, in ​Jan. 1806; from which period we lose sight of him until his appointment to be first of the Eridanus frigate. Captain William King, Mar. 5, 1816. In the summer of the following year, he was senior lieutenant of the Royal George yacht, bearing the royal standard, during his present Majesty^s aquatic excursions in the neighbourhood of Portsmouth; and he subsequently commanded the Camelion brig, on the same station, upwards of three years. His first commissions as commander and post-captain bear date Oct. 2, 1817, and Jan. 29, 1822.
Captain Mingay’s next appointment was, July 22, 1824, to the Romney 50, armed en flûte, fitting as a troop-ship at Chatham. Since Jan. 8, 1825, he has commanded the Hyperion frigate, on the establishment of a third rate, lying in Newhaven harbour, for the purposes of the extended coast blockade.
# Royal Naval Biography/Molesworth, Bourchier

Layout 2
BOURCHIER MOLESWORTH, Esq. [Commander.]
Was made a lieutenant in Oct. 1805; and promoted from the Royal Charlotte yacht (Captain Thomas Eyles) to the rank of commander. May 16, 1814.
# Richmond Mortgage Loan Corporation v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
300 U.S. 124
Richmond Mortgage Loan Corporation v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Company
Argued: Jan. 4, 1937. --- Decided: Feb 1, 1937
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina.
Messrs. Kester Walton and John Y. Jordan, Jr., both of Asheville, N.C., for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from page 125 intentionally omitted]
Mr. S. G. Bernard, of Asheville, N.C., for appellees.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS, delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Richmond Screw Anchor Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
275 U.S. 331
Richmond Screw Anchor Company v. United States
Argued: Dec. 1, 1927. --- Decided: Jan 3, 1928
Messrs. Charles E. Hughes, Wm. Houston Kenyon, Archibald Cox, O. Ellery Edwards, and Douglas H. Kenyon, all of New York City, and Joseph W. Cox, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 332-334 intentionally omitted]
The Attorney General and Mr. Herman J. Galloway, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 335-337 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Richmond Television Corporation v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
382 U.S. 68
Richmond Television Corporation v. United States
Robert T. Barton, Jr., for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall and Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, for the United States.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Opinion on remand 354 F.2d 410.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Richmond Television Corporation v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
382 U.S. 68
Richmond Television Corporation v. United States
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted.
In the light of the representations of the Solicitor General, and an independent examination of the record, we believe that the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit was mistaken in its view that the petitioner's amortization claims for the taxable years 1956 and 1957 were not properly before it. Although the record is not free from ambiguity, we take the Court of Appeals to have based its decision on the ground that the petitioner's amortization claims derived solely from net operating loss deductions carried forward from prior years, and that no additional amortization deductions for 1956 and 1957 were sought. Since we find that the petitioner adequately presented its amortization claims for 1956 and 1957, we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the case to that court for the consideration of those claims, without intimation of any kind as to their merit.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Richmond Mining Company of Nevada v. Rose

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
114 U.S. 576
Richmond Mining Company of Nevada v. Rose
Page 578
Thos. Wren and Walter H. Smith, for plaintiff in error.
A. T. Britton, J. H. McGowen, A. B. Browne, and C. J. Hillyer, for defendants in error.
MILLER, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ross v. Fort

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
290 U.S. 603
Ross v. Fort
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee.
Mr. J. A. Fowler, of Knoxville, Tenn., for appellant.
For opinion below, see 61 S.W.(2d) 479.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ross v. Oregon

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
227 U.S. 150
Ross v. Oregon
Argued: January 27, 1913. ---
Messrs. William d. guthrie and Wallace McCamant for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 151-154 intentionally omitted]
Mr. A. M. Crawford, Attorney General of Oregon, and Messrs. Martin L. Pipes and George J. Cameron for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 154 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Van Devanter delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ross v. Fort/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
290 U.S. 603
Ross v. Fort
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial Federal question. (1) Maguire v. Trefry, 253 U.S. 12, 40 S.C.t. 417, 64 L. Ed. 739; (2) Klein v. Board of Supervisors, 282 U.S. 19, 22-24, 51 S.C.t. 15, 75 L. Ed. 140, 73 A. L. R. 679; Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank, 170 U.S. 283, 298, 299, 18 S.C.t. 594, 42 L. Ed. 1037; Keeney v. New York, 222 U.S. 525, 535, 536, 32 S.C.t. 105, 56 L. Ed. 299; Standard Stock Food Co. v. Wright, 225 U.S. 540, 550, 32 S.C.t. 784, 56 L. Ed. 1197.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ross v. Jones

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
89 U.S. 576
Ross v. Jones

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse