OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Manchuria

* Manchuria (1907), in The Chinese Empire. A General & Missionary Survey/Manchuria
* "Manchuria," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Manchuria," in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
* "Manchuria," in Encyclopædia Britannica (12th ed., 1922)
* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Manchuria."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
# Manchester v. Ericsson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
105 U.S. 347
Manchester v. Ericsson
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Christopher C. McRae and Mr. William A. Maury for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. Charles V. Meredith and Mr. George K. Macon for the defendant in error.
MR. JUSTICE MILLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mancusi v. DeForte
## Dissenting Opinions

    Black
    White
United States Supreme Court
392 U.S. 364
Mancusi, Warden v. DeForte
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
No. 844. Argued: April 25, 1968. --- Decided: June 17, 1968.
The Nassau County District Attorney issued a subpoena duces tecum to the Union of which respondent was an officer calling for the production of certain books and records. The Union refused to comply and the state officials without a warrant seized union records from an office shared by respondent and several other union officials, despite the protests of respondent who was present in the office and had custody of the papers at the time of seizure. The seized materials were admitted at his trial for conspiracy, coercion, and extortion, and he was convicted. The federal District Court denied a writ of habeas corpus, but the Court of Appeals reversed and directed that the writ issue on the ground that respondent's Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated by the search and seizure and that the materials were inadmissible under Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643. Respondent argues for affirmance on this ground alone.
Held:
    1. One has standing to object to a search of his office, as well as of his home, and respondent was entitled to expect that records in his custody at his office in union headquarters would not be taken without his permission or that of his union superiors, whether he occupied a "private" office or shared one with other union officials. Respondent thus had standing to object to the admission of the seized papers at his trial. Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257. Pp. 367-370.
    2. The warrantless search of respondent's office was unreasonable under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments as the subpoena duces tecum, issued by the District Attorney himself, does not qualify as a valid search warrant, and this search comes within no exception to the rule requiring a warrant. Pp. 370-372.
379 F. 2d 897, affirmed.
Michael H. Rauch, Assistant Attorney General of New York, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General, and Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistat Attorney General.
James L. Lekin argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Manchester Courier and Lancashire General Advertiser/1891/Obituary: Charles Gatliff

Source: Manchester Courier and Lancashire General Advertiser Saturday, January 31, 1891; pg. 7; Issue 10678 — Obituary
Layout 2
Obituary
The death is announced, at his residence in Hampstead, of Mr. Charles Gatliff, in his 81st year. Mr. Gatliff, a solicitor by profession, was the first to call the attention of the country, in the year 1841, to the necessity for the improvement of the dwellings of the artisan class, a subject which has since so largely occupied public attention The result of Mr. Gatliff's labours was that on the 15th of September, 1841, an association for improving the dwellings of the industrial classes was formed. This association obtained a Royal charter of incorporation during the Administration of Sir Robert Peel in the year 1845. The first block of improved dwellings was opened by the association in the year 1847 in the old Pancras-road, and was visited by the late Prince Consort, who took deep interest in the movement. A medal was awarded to this association at the great Exhibition of 1851, since that date five other medals have been awarded to this association for their models of improved dwellings for the poor erected in all parts of the metropolis. Mr. Gatliff was secretary to the above-mentioned association from the time of its formation in 1841 till the year 1888.
# Manchester Courier and Lancashire General Advertiser/1914/Former M.P.'s Suicide. Ex-candidate for Bury's pathetic letter.

Source: Manchester Courier and Lancashire General Advertiser, Wednesday, May 13, 1914; pg. 8; Issue 17946. — Former M.P.'s Suicide.
Former M.P.'s Suicide. Ex-candidate for Bury's pathetic letter.
Distressing details were revealed at the inquest at Westminster yesterday upon Mr. Reginald Jaffray Lucas (48), at one time Unionist M.P. for Portsmouth, and Unionist candidate for Bury in 1906, who died fro wounds self-inflected with a revolver.
The evidence of the deceased's relatives, the Rev. Francis Lucas, of Wickham Market, Suffolk, his brother, and Mrs. Amy Maude, a sister, was to the effect that he was undergoing treatment from a specialist for a complaint of the throat. Mrs. Maude, calling on her brother in response to a telephone summons on Tuesday at the Albany, Piccadilly, where he lived, found him jumpy and nervous.
He complained that he had had a "terrible doing" that morning, but she called him down and left him in the evening. The morning before he died from revolver wounds he said to her, "I must have been off my head when I did it."
After the testimony of servants at the Albany, Dr. Monier Williams, of Onslow Gardens, said that deceased was suffering from consumption of the lungs, and was under treatment from Sir St. Clair Thomson. In Tuesday last he confessed to witness that he had shot himself four times through the chest, and expressed the fear that he had made a bad job of it. He died the following Saturday.
A letter fro the deceased to his brother read as follows: "I have a malignant disease. A sanatorium cure to me would be intolerable. All medical skill can do is at best, palliative. I have been suffering much pain and discomfort. The future must be all pain and sickness, and I should be a burden to myself and nuisance to everybody else. The best thing is to hasten the end. I trust to the mercy of the Almighty God who has blessed to me so abundantly. I am very sorry for my sisters and a few others who will care. God bless you all."
A verdict of "Suicide whilst of unsound mind" was returned.
This work was published in 1914 and is anonymous or pseudonymous due to unknown authorship. It is in the public domain in the United States as well as countries and areas where the copyright terms of anonymous or pseudonymous works are 109 years or less since publication.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Maneja v. Waialua Agricultural Company Limited

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
349 U.S. 254
Maneja v. Waialua Agricultural Company Limited
Argued: March 30, 1955. --- Decided: May 23, 1955
[Syllabus from pages 254-255 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Richard Gladstein, San Francisco, Cal., for Maneja et al.
Bessie Margolin, Washington, D.C., for Secretary of Labor as Amicus curiae by invitation of the Court.
Mr. Rufus G. Poole, Washington, D.C., for Waialua Agricultural Co.
Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mardi/Volume I/Chapter XII

On the third morning, at break of day, I sat at the steering oar, an hour or two previous having relieved Jarl, now fast asleep. Somehow, and suddenly, a sense of peril so intense, came over me, that it could hardly have been aggravated by the completest solitude.
On a ship's deck, the mere feeling of elevation above the water, and the reach of prospect you command, impart a degree of confidence which disposes you to exult in your fancied security. But in an open boat, brought down to the very plane of the sea, this feeling almost wholly deserts you. Unless the waves, in their gambols, toss you and your chip upon one of their lordly crests, your sphere of vision is little larger than it would be at the bottom of a well. At best, your most extended view in any one direction, at least, is in a high, slow-rolling sea; when you descend into the dark, misty spaces, between long and uniform swells. Then, for the moment, it is like looking up and down in a twilight glade, interminable; where two dawns, one on each hand, seem struggling through the semi-transparent tops of the fluid mountains.
But, lingering not long in those silent vales, from watery cliff to cliff, a sea-chamois, sprang our solitary craft,—a goat among the Alps!
How undulated the horizon; like a vast serpent with ten thousand folds coiled all round the globe; yet so nigh, apparently, that it seemed as if one's hand might touch it.
What loneliness; when the sun rose, and spurred up the heavens, we hailed him as a wayfarer in Sahara the sight of a distant horseman. Save ourselves, the sun and the Chamois seemed all that was left of life in the universe. We yearned toward its jocund disk, as in strange lands the traveler joyfully greets a face from home, which there had passed unheeded. And was not the sun a fellow-voyager? were we not both wending westward? But how soon he daily overtook and passed us; hurrying to his journey's end.
When a week had gone by, sailing steadily on, by day and by night, and nothing in sight but this self-same sea, what wonder if disquieting thoughts at last entered our hearts? If unknowingly we should pass the spot where, according to our reckoning, our islands lay, upon what shoreless sea would we launch? At times, these forebodings bewildered my idea of the positions of the groups beyond. All became vague and confused; so that westward of the Kingsmil isles and the Radack chain, I fancied there could be naught but an endless sea.
# Mardi/Volume I/Chapter XL

Seeing flight was useless, the Islanders again stopped their canoe, and once more we cautiously drew nearer; myself crying out to them not to be fearful; and Samoa, with the odd humor of his race, averring that he had known every soul of them from his infancy.
We approached within two or three yards; when we paused, which somewhat allayed their alarm. Fastening a red China handkerchief to the blade of our long mid-ship oar, I waved it in the air. A lively clapping of hands, and many wild exclamations.
While yet waving the flag, I whispered to Jarl to give the boat a sheer toward the canoe, which being adroitly done, brought the bow, where I stood, still nearer to the Islanders. I then dropped the silk among them; and the Islander, who caught it, at once handed it to the warlike old man with the sling; who, on seating himself, spread it before him; while the rest crowding round, glanced rapidly from the wonderful gift, to the more wonderful donors.
This old man was the superior of the party. And Samoa asserted, that he must be a priest of the country to which the Islanders belonged; that the craft could be no other than one of their sacred canoes, bound on some priestly voyage. All this he inferred from the altar-like prow, and there being no women on board.
Bent upon conciliating the old priest, I dropped into the canoe another silk handkerchief; while Samoa loudly exclaimed, that we were only three men, and were peaceably inclined. Meantime, old Aaron, fastening the two silks crosswise over his shoulders, like a brace of Highland plaids, crosslegged sat, and eyed us.
It was a curious sight. The old priest, like a scroll of old parchment, covered all over with hieroglyphical devices, harder to interpret, I'll warrant, than any old Sanscrit manuscript. And upon his broad brow, deep-graven in wrinkles, were characters still more mysterious, which no Champollion nor gipsy could have deciphered. He looked old as the elderly hills; eyes sunken, though bright; and head white as the summit of Mont Blanc.
The rest were a youthful and comely set: their complexion that of Gold Sherry, and all tattooed after this pattern: two broad cross-stripes on the chest and back; reaching down to the waist, like a foot-soldier's harness. Their faces were full of expression; and their mouths were full of fine teeth; so that the parting of their lips, was as the opening of pearl oysters. Marked, here and there, after the style of Tahiti, with little round figures in blue, dotted in the middle with a spot of vermilion, their brawny brown thighs looked not unlike the gallant hams of Westphalia, spotted with the red dust of Cayenne.
But what a marvelous resemblance in the features of all. Were they born at one birth? This resemblance was heightened by their uniform marks. But it was subsequently ascertained, that they were the children of one sire; and that sire, old Aaron; who, no doubt, reposed upon his sons, as an old general upon the trophies of his youth.
They were the children of as many mothers; and he was training them up for the priesthood.
# Mardi/Volume I/Chapter XI

If ever again I launch whale-boat from sheer-plank of ship at sea, I shall take good heed, that my comrade be a sprightly fellow, with a rattle-box head. Be he never so silly, his very silliness, so long as he be lively at it, shall be its own excuse.
Upon occasion, who likes not a lively loon, one of your giggling, gamesome oafs, whose mouth is a grin? Are not such, well-ordered dispensations of Providence? filling up vacuums, in intervals of social stagnation relieving the tedium of existing? besides keeping up, here and there, in very many quarters indeed, sundry people's good opinion of themselves? What, if at times their speech is insipid as water after wine? What, if to ungenial and irascible souls, their very "mug" is an exasperation to behold, their clack an inducement to suicide? Let us not be hard upon them for this; but let them live on for the good they may do.
But Jarl, dear, dumb Jarl, thou wert none of these. Thou didst carry a phiz like an excommunicated deacon's. And no matter what happened, it was ever the same. Quietly, in thyself, thou didst revolve upon thine own sober axis, like a wheel in a machine which forever goes round, whether you look at it or no. Ay, Jarl! wast thou not forever intent upon minding that which so many neglect—thine own especial business? Wast thou not forever at it, too, with no likelihood of ever winding up thy moody affairs, and striking a balance sheet?
But at times how wearisome to me these everlasting reveries in my one solitary companion. I longed for something enlivening; a burst of words; human vivacity of one kind or other. After in vain essaying to get something of this sort out of Jarl, I tried it all by myself; playing upon my body as upon an instrument; singing, halloing, and making empty gestures, till my Viking stared hard; and I myself paused to consider whether I had run crazy or no.
But how account for the Skyeman's gravity? Surely, it was based upon no philosophic taciturnity; he was nothing of an idealist; an aerial architect; a constructor of flying buttresses. It was inconceivable, that his reveries were Manfred-like and exalted, reminiscent of unutterable deeds, too mysterious even to be indicated by the remotest of hints. Suppositions all out of the question.
His ruminations were a riddle. I asked him anxiously, whether, in any part of the world, Savannah, Surat, or Archangel, he had ever a wife to think of; or children, that he carried so lengthy a phiz. Nowhere neither. Therefore, as by his own confession he had nothing to think of but himself, and there was little but honesty in him (having which, by the way, he may be thought full to the brim), what could I fall back upon but my original theory: namely, that in repose, his intellects stepped out, and left his body to itself.
# Lumberman's National Bank of Williamsport v. Huston

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
167 U.S. 203
Lumberman's National Bank of Williamsport v. Huston
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lumberman's National Bank of Williamsport v. Huston/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
167 U.S. 203
Lumberman's National Bank of Williamsport v. Huston
May 10, 1897.
The most favorable view of this case for the plaintiff in error is to regard it as presenting the same question that was determined in Bank v. Nebecker (just decided) 17 Sup. Ct. 766. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice WHITE concurs in the result.
J. J. Crawford, for plaintiff in error.
Sol. Gen. Conrad, for defendant in error.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company v. Elbert

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
348 U.S. 48
Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company v. Elbert
Argued: Oct. 14, 1954. --- Decided: Dec 6, 1954
Mr.Charles L. Mayer, Shreveport, La., for petitioner.
Messrs. John M. Madison, Whitfield Jack, Shrevoport, La., for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lumbra v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
290 U.S. 551
Lumbra v. United States
Argued: Nov. 17, 1933. --- Decided: Jan 8, 1934
Messrs. Warren E. Miller, of Washington, D.C., and Consuelo B. Northrop, of Burlington, Vt., for petitioner.
The Attorney General and Mr. Will G. Beardslee, of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lumiere v. Mae Edna Wilder

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
261 U.S. 174
Lumiere v. Mae Edna Wilder
Argued: Jan. 18, 1923. --- Decided: Feb 19, 1923
Mr. W. S. Evans, of New York City, for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 174-176 intentionally omitted]
Mr. F. F. Church, of Rochester, N. Y., for appellee.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Macmillan, Malcolm Reginald

​Macmillan, Malcolm Reginald, clerk in the exchequer and audit department, matric. London Univ. 1874, a student of the Middle Temple 22 Jan., 1878, called to the bar 17 Nov. 1882 (eldest son of late Ronald Macmillan of Java, merchant); born , .
    Somerset House, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Macpherson, Alan

​Macpherson, Alan, B.A., Exeter Coll., Oxon, 1881, a student of Lincoln's Inn 24 May, 1878 (then aged 21), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1881 (2nd son of Allan Macpherson, Esq., of Blairgowrie, Perthshire); born , 1857.
    Blairgowrie House, Blairgowrie, N.B.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Macmeikan, John Alexander

​Macmeikan, John Alexander, M.A. (late scholar), St. John's Coll., Camb., 1876, B.A. (1st class classics) 1871, a student of Lincoln's Inn 9 May, 1870 (then aged 21), called to the bar 7 June, 1873 (only son of John Macmeikan, Esq., of Bickerton House, Cheshire); born , 1849; married 3 June, 1874, Helena Ruddiman, 3rd dau. of James E. McConnell, of Great Missenden, Bucks, J.P. etc.
    45, Leamington Road Villas, W.; Chapel Staircase, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Macnamara, Walter Henry

​Macnamara, Walter Henry, registrar to railway commissioners since March, 1882, was reporter for Law Journal in court for Crown cases reserved, late prosecuting counsel for the Mint on Oxford circuit, joint author of four vols. of Railway Commissioners' Decisions, editor of 6th edition of Paley on Summary Convictions, 4th edition of Steer's Parish Law, 9th edition of Stone's Practice for Justices of the Peace, and 3rd edition of Woolrych's Metropolitan Building Acts, a student of the Inner Temple 14 April, 1871 (then aged 23), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1874 (eldest son of Henry Tyrwhitt Jones Macnamara, Esq., of London, bar.-at-law and railway commissioner); born 7 Aug., 1851; married 29 July, 1882, Florence, only dau. of Francis Mauduit, Esq., C.E.
    5, Hyde Park Mansions, W.; Railway Commission, House of Lords, S.W.; Junior Athenæum Club.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Macleod, Simon John Fraser

​Macleod, Simon John Fraser, LL.B. London Univ., a member of the Western circuit, a student of the Middle Temple 14 May, 1878, studentship jurisprudence and Roman law Jan., 1880, 1st class studentship in international and constitutional law June, 1880, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1881 (2nd son of William Macleod, M.D., C.B., R.N., inspector-general of hospitals and fleets); born 29 Aug., 1857.
    4, Brick Court, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Macnaghten, Edward

​Macnaghten, Edward, Q.C, M.P. co. Antrim since 1880, M.A. (late fellow), Trin. Coll., Camb., 1855, secretary Chancery Funds Commission since 1862, a member of the Bar Committee since Dec., 1883, declined a judgeship in 1883, a student of Lincoln's Inn 13 Jan., 1853 (then aged 22), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1857, Q.C. April, 1880, bencher 3 April, 1883 (2nd son of Sir Edmund Workman Macnaghten, of Dundarave, co. Antrim, Bart.); born , 1830; married 18 Dec., 1858, Frances Arabella, only child of late Rt. Hon. Sir Samuel Martin, baron of the exchequer, and has issue (see Foster's Baronetage).
    198, Queen's Gate, S W.; 3, New Square, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.; Carlton and United University Clubs.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Macnaghten, Steuart

​Macnaghten, Steuart, B.A., Trin. Coll., Dublin, 1835, J.P. Hants, editor of Select Cases in Chancery 1724-33, with Notes, joint editor of Reports of Cases in High Court of Chancery 1849-51, a student of King's Inns Dublin, Mich., 1834, went to the Middle Temple 1 June, 1835, where he was called to the bar 19 April, 1839 (6th son of Sir Francis Macnaghten, of Bushmill House, co. Antrim, Bart.); born 20 June, 1815; married thrice and has issue (see Foster's Baronetage).
    Bittern Manor House, Southampton; Carlton Club.