OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Frank Leslie's Lady's Magazine

Monthly magazine
* Volume 12 (January–June 1863) (external scans (multiple parts): 1, 2)
* Volume 13 (July–December 1863)
* Volume 14 (January–June 1864) (external scan)
* Volume 15 (July–December 1864) (external scan)
* Volume 16 (January–June 1865) (external scan)
* Volume 17 (July–December 1865) (external scans (multiple parts): 1, 2)
* Volume 18 (January–June 1866) (external scan)
* Volume 19 (July–December 1866) (external scan)
* Volume 20 (January–June 1874)
* Volume 21 (July–December 1867)
* Volume 22 (January–June 1868)
* Volume 23 (July–December 1868)
* Volume 24 (January–June 1869) (start transcription)
* Volume 25 (July–December 1869) (transcription project)
* Volume 26 (January–June 1870)
* Volume 27 (July–December 1870)
* Volume 28 (January–June 1871) (external scan)
* Volume 29 (July–December 1871)
* Volume 30 (January–June 1872)
* Volume 31 (July–December 1872) (external scan)
* Volume 32 (January–June 1873) (external scan)
* Volume 33 (July–December 1873)
* Volume 34 (January–June 1874) (external scan)
* Volume 35 (July–December 1874) (external scans (multiple parts): 1, 2)
* Volume 36 (January–June 1875) (external scans (multiple parts): 1, 2)
* Volume 37 (July–December 1875) (external scan)
* Volume 38 (January–June 1876) (external scan)
* Volume 39 (July–December 1876) (external scan)
* Volume 40 (January–June 1877) (external scan)
* Volume 41 (July–December 1877) (external scan)
* Volume 42 (January–June 1878) (external scan)
* Volume 43 (July–December 1878) (external scan)
* Volume 44 (January–June 1879) (external scan)
* Volume 45 (July–December 1879)
* Volume 46 (January–June 1880)
* Volume 47 (July–December 1880)
* Volume 48 (January–June 1881) (external scan)
* Volume 49 (July–December 1881)
* Volume 50 (January–June 1882) (external scan)
* Volume 51 (July–December 1882) (external scan)
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper/Volume 21

* Number 521, 23 September 1865
* Number 522, 30 September 1865
* Number 523, 7 October 1865
* Number 524, 14 October 1865
* Number 525, 21 October 1865
* Number 526, 28 October 1865
* Number 527, 4 November 1865
* Number 528, 11 November 1865
* Number 529, 18 November 1865
* Number 530, 25 November 1865
* Number 531, 2 December 1865
* Number 532, 9 December 1865
* Number 533, 16 December 1865
* Number 534, 23 December 1865
* Number 535, 30 December 1865
* Number 536, 6 January 1866
* Number 537, 13 January 1866
* Number 538, 20 January 1866
* Number 539, 27 January 1866
* Number 540, 3 February 1866
* Number 541, 10 February 1866
* Number 542, 17 February 1866
* Number 543, 24 February 1866
* Number 544, 3 March 1866
* Number 545, 10 March 1866
* Number 546, 17 March 1866
# Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper/Volume 9

* Number 209, 3 December 1859
* Number 210, 10 December 1859
* Number 211, 17 December 1859
* Number 212, 24 December 1859
* Number 213, 31 December 1859
* Number 214, 7 January 1860
* Number 215, 14 January 1860
* Number 216, 21 January 1860
* Number 217, 28 January 1860
* Number 218, 4 February 1860
* Number 219, 11 February 1860
* Number 220, 18 February 1860
* Number 221, 25 February 1860
* Number 222, 3 March 1860
* Number 223, 10 March 1860
* Number 224, 17 March 1860
* Number 225, 24 March 1860
* Number 226, 31 March 1860
* Number 227, 7 April 1860
* Number 228, 14 April 1860
* Number 229, 21 April 1860
* Number 230, 28 April 1860
* Number 231, 5 May 1860
* Number 232, 12 May 1860
* Number 233, 19 May 1860
* Number 234, 26 May 1860
# Frank Leslie's Illustrated Weekly/Volume 73

* Number 1890, 5 December 1891 IA
* Number 1891, 12 December 1891 IA
* Number 1892, 19 December 1891 IA
* Number 1893, 26 December 1891 IA
* Number 1894, 2 January 1892 IA
* Number 1895, 9 January 1892 IA
* Number 1896, 16 January 1892 IA
* Number 1897, 23 January 1892 IA
* Number 1898, 30 January 1892 IA
# Francis Parkman

September 16, 1823–November 8, 1823 Read at the memorial meeting of the Massachusetts Historical Society
He rests from toil; the portals of the tomb  Close on the last of those unwearying hands That wove their pictured webs in History's loom,  Rich with the memories of three distant lands.
One wrought the record of the Royal Pair  Who saw the great Discoverer's sail unfurled, Happy his more than regal prize to share,  The spoils, the wonders, of the sunset world.
There, too, he found his theme; upreared anew,  Our eyes beheld the vanished Aztec shrines, And all the silver splendors of Peru  That lured the conqueror to her fatal mines. Nor less remembered he who told the tale  Of empire wrested from the strangling sea; Of Leyden's woe, that turned his readers pale,  The price of unborn freedom yet to be;
Who taught the New World what the Old could teach;  Whose silent hero, peerless as our own, By deeds that mocked the feeble breath of speech Called up to life a State without a Throne.
As year by year his tapestry unrolled,  What varied wealth its growing length displayed! What long processions flamed in cloth of gold!  What stately forms their flowing robes arrayed!
Not such the scenes our later craftsman drew;  Not such the shapes his darker pattern held; A deeper shadow lent its sober hue,  A sadder tale his tragic task compelled.
He told the red man's story; far and wide  He searched the unwritten records of his race; He sat a listener at the Sachem's side,  He tracked the hunter through his wild-wood chase.
High o'er his head the soaring eagle screamed;  The wolf's long howl rang nightly; through the vale Tramped the long bear; the panther's eyeballs gleamed;  The bison's gallop thundered on the gale.
Soon o'er the horizon rose the cloud of strife,—  Two proud, strong nations battling for the prize,— Which swarming host should mould a nation's life,  Which royal banner float the western skies.
Long raged the conflict; on the crimson sod  Native and alien joined their hosts in vain; The lilies withered where the Lion trod,  Till Peace lay panting on the ravaged plain.
A nobler task was theirs who strove to win  The blood-stained heathen to the Christian fold, To free from Satan's clutch the slaves of sin;  Their labors, too, with loving grace he told.
Halting with feeble step, or bending o'er  The sweet-breathed roses which he loved so well, While through long years his burdening cross he bore,  From those firm lips no coward accents the fall.
A brave, bright memory! his the stainless shield  No shame defaces and no envy mars! When our far future's record is unsealed,  His name will shine among its morning stars.
# Francis v. Flinn/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
118 U.S. 385
Francis v. Flinn
Argued: May 10, 1886. ---
The bill does not state what the publications were of which the plaintiff complains, or what the divers suits instigated by the defendants were, other than those mentioned, in which charges were made as to towing vessels through the pass without pilots, and as to certain persons not being branch pilots, or contracting not to serve as such. Nor does it state any of the other 'various and diverse ways' in which he is injured by the defendants. The whole gist of the complaint is that the defendants do not treat the plaintiff as having a right to use his vessel as a pilot-boat, and have publicly so stated, and that some of the parties mentioned have been subjected to suits for their acts in piloting. But if this be so, the plaintiff has a full remedy for his alleged wrongs in the courts of law. They furnish no ground for the interposition of a court of equity. If the plaintiff has a right to pilot vessels with his boat through the pass, and is wrongfully interfered with by the defendants or others, he can prosecute them for the wrong. If his vessel is arrested in its passage, without lawful warrant, he can bring the defendants before the courts to answer for their conduct. If his pilots are duly licensed, and they are hindered or prevented from the exercise of their business, both he and they have the same means of redress which are afforded to every citizen whose rights are invaded and obstructed. If the publications in the newspapers are false and injurious, he can prosecute the publishers for libel. If a court of equity could interfere and use its remedy of injunction in such cases, it would draw to itself the greater part of the litigation properly belonging to courts of law.
We think the court below should have sustained the demurrer of the defendants for want of equity in the bill. The decree must therefore be reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to dismiss the bill; and it is so ordered.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Francis v. Francis

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
203 U.S. 233
Francis v. Francis
Argued: October 10, 1906. --- Decided: December 3, 1906
Messrs. Henry M. Duffield, Nathaniel T. Crutchfield, James Van Kleeck, and Thomas E. Webster for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 233-235 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chester L. Collins for defendants in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 235-236 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Francis v. McNeal

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
228 U.S. 695
Francis v. McNeal
Argued: May 5 and 6, 1913. --- Decided: May 26, 1913
Messrs. Charles L. Frailey and Henry J. Scott for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 695-698 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. George Wharton Pepper and Edgar J. Pershing for respondent.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fairbanks v. United States (223 U.S. 215)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
223 U.S. 215
Fairbanks v. United States
Argued: January 18 and 19, 1912. --- Decided: February 19, 1912
Messrs. F. W. Houghton and George B. Edgerton for appellants.
Assistant Attorney General Knaebel and Mr. S. W. Williams for appellee.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fairbanks v. United States (306 U.S. 436)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
306 U.S. 436
Fairbanks v. United States (306 U.S. 436)
Argued: Feb. 28, 1939. --- Decided: March 27, 1939
Messrs. William Stanley, of Washington, D.C., and Arthur F. Driscoll, of New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Andrew D. Sharpe, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for the United States.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fairbanks v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Fairbanks v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Fairbanks v. United States (223 U.S. 215)
* Fairbanks v. United States (306 U.S. 436)
# Fairchild v. Hughes

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
258 U.S. 126
Fairchild v. Hughes
Argued: Jan. 23, 1922. --- Decided: Feb 27, 1922
Messrs. Wm. L. Marbury and Thomas F. Cadwalader, both of Baltimore, Everett P. Wheeler, of New York City, Alfred D. Smith, of Washington, D. C., and Waldo G. Morse, of New York City, for appellant.
Mr. Solicitor General Beck, of Washington, D. C., for appellees.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Freedom (Emerson)

Once I wished I might rehearse
* Freedom in May-day and other pieces (1867)
* Freedom in Poems (Household Edition, 1904)
# Fairy Tales by the Countess d'Aulnoy

FAIRY TALES,
BY
THE COUNTESS D'AULNOY.
TRANSLATED BY
J. R. PLANCHÉ.
SECOND EDITION.
With Illustrations by John Gilbert.
LONDON: G. ROUTLEDGE & CO. FARRINGDON STREET. NEW YORK: 18, BEEKMAN STREET. 1856.
This Translation is Copyright.
TO
HER ROYAL HIGHNESS
THE PRINCESS MARY
OF
CAMBRIDGE,
This Volume
IS RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED
BY
HER ROYAL HIGHNESS'S
VERY DUTIFUL
AND
MOST OBEDIENT HUMBLE SERVANT,
J. R. PLANCHÉ.
CONTENTS
PAGE
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Flynn v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
283 U.S. 53
Flynn v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad Company
Argued: March 12, 1931. --- Decided: March 23, 1931
Messrs. Wm. F. Geenty and Thomas R. Fitz Simmons, both of New Haven, Conn., for petitioner.
Mr. Edward R. Brumley, of New York City, for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 54-55 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Flynn v. Hubbard

* related portals: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
* 782 F.2d 1084
* Michael J. FLYNN, Plaintiff, Appellee
* v.
* Lafayette Ronald HUBBARD a/k/a L. Ron Hubbard, Defendant, Appellee. CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Appeal of
* Michael J. FLYNN, Plaintiff, Appellee,
* v.
* Lafayette Ronald HUBBARD a/k/a L. Ron Hubbard, Defendant, Appellee.
* Mary Sue HUBBARD, Appeal of
* No. 85-1397, 85-1398
* United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
* Argued Oct. 7, 1985.
* Decided Feb. 7, 1986.
Intervention by joint tort-feasors was sought in tort action in which sole defendant had chosen not to appear. The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, John J. McNaught, J., denied intervention, and joint tort-feasors appealed. The Court of Appeals, Bownes, Circuit Judge, held that: (1) there could be no intervention as of right by joint tort-feasors until and unless sole defendant appeared, and (2) refusal to permit permissive intervention by joint tort-feasors was not abuse of discretion. Affirmed.
Coffin, Circuit Judge, filed concurring opinion.
Leonard B. Boudin, New York City with whom Eric M. Lieberman, Edward Copeland, Rabinowitz, Boudin, Standard, Krinsky & Lieberman, P.C., New York City, Roger Geller and Geller & Weinberg, Boston, Mass., were on brief for appellant Church of Scientology of California, Inc. Michael Lee Hertzberg, New York City with whom Roger Geller, and Geller & Weinberg, Boston, Mass., were on brief for appellant Mary Sue Hubbard.
Michael A. Tabb, Boston, Mass., with whom Flynn & Joyce, David M. Bansah, and Hollingsworth & Associates, Boston, Mass., were on brief for appellee.

## Before COFFIN, Circuit Judge, TIMBERS, [FN*] Senior Circuit Judge, and BOWNES, Circuit Judge.

FN* Of the Second Circuit, sitting by designation.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse

## See also

* Category:Scientology
# Foch Estates v. McDonald

Foch Estates, Inc. v. McDonald, Federal Housing Adm’r.
Civ. No. 1154.
District Court, E. D. New York.
Nov. 19, 1940.
Action by Foch Estates, Incorporated, against Stewart McDonald, as Federal Housing Administrator. The action was commenced in the state court and removed to the Federal District Court. On defendant’s motion for an order directing the removal of the action from the jury calendar to the nonjury calendar.
Motion granted.
Robinson, Hennessy & Weitzer, of New York City (Joseph S. Robinson, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.
Harold M. Kennedy, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Albert V. De Meo, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant.
Moscowitz, District Judge.
This is a motion for an order directing the removal of this action from the jury calendar to the non-jury calendar.
This action was commenced in the State Court and removed to this Court. Thereafter an answer was interposed on June 3, 1940, and is the last pleading served in this action.
On October 3, 1940, plaintiff’s attorneys served upon defendant’s attorney a demand for a jury trial. Subdivision (b) of Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, provides that a demand for a trial by jury must be served not later than ten (10) days after the service of the last pleading directed to such issue. Subdivision (d) of Rule 38 provides that the failure to serve such a demand constitutes a waiver of trial by jury.
Rule 39, subdivision (b), of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that the Court in its discretion upon motion may order a trial by jury of any or all issues. No reason has been indicated why such discretion should be exercised.
Motion granted.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Flynn v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
283 U.S. 53
Flynn v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad Company
Argued: March 12, 1931. --- Decided: March 23, 1931
This is a suit under the Employers' Liability Act (45 USCA §§ 51-59) for negligently causing the death of Edward L. Flynn, brought on May 15, 1929, by Flynn's executor for the benefit of Flynn's dependent widow and children. It is alleged that the injury was suffered on December 4, 1923, and that it caused Flynn's death on September 1, 1928. The defendant, respondent here, demurred to the declaration on the ground that more than two years having elapsed since the date when Flynn's cause of action accrued his right to sue was barred, and that therefore the suit could not be maintained. Act of April 22, 1908, c. 149, §§ 1, 6, 35 Stat. 65, 66; Act of April 5, 1910, c. 143, § 1, 36 Stat. 291; Code, tit. 45, §§ 51, 56 (45 USCA §§ 51, 56). The demurrer and judgment for the defendant were sustained by the Supreme Court of Connecticut. 111 Conn. 196, 149 A. 682. A writ of certiorari was granted by this Court. 282 U.S. 821, 51 S.C.t. 30, 75 L. Ed. -.
The Act of 1908 gives a right of action to the employee or, in case of his death, to his personal representative for the benefit of the widow and children and provides that no action shall be maintained 'unless commenced within two years from the day the cause of action accrued.' Section 6 (45 USCA § 56). Obviously Flynn's right of action was barred, but it is argued that the right on behalf of the widow and children is distinct; that their cause of action could not arise until Flynn's death, and that therefore the two years did not begin to run until September 1, 1928. But the argument ome § too late. It is established that the present right, although not strictly representative, is derivative and dependent upon the continuance of a right in the injured employee at the time of his death. Michigan Central R. R. Co. v. Vreeland, 227 U.S. 59, 70, 33 S.C.t. 192, 57 L. Ed. 417, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 176. On this ground an effective release by the employee makes it impossible for his administrator to recover. Mellon v. Goodyear, 277 U.S. 335, 344, 48 S.C.t. 541, 72 L. Ed. 906. The running of the two years from the time when his cause of action accrued extinguishes it as effectively as a release, Engel v. Davenport, 271 U.S. 33, 38, 46 S.C.t. 410, 70 L. Ed. 813, and the same consequence follows. Our conclusion that this action could not be brought is required by the former decisions of this Court.
Judgment affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Flint and Feather (1914)/Part 3/"And He Said, Fight On"

"AND HE SAID, FIGHT ON" (Tennyson)
Time and its ally, Dark Disarmament, Have compassed me about, Have massed their armies, and on battle bent My forces put to rout; But though I fight alone, and fall, and die, Talk terms of Peace? Not I.
They war upon my fortress, and their guns Are shattering its walls; My army plays the cowards' part, and runs, Pierced by a thousand balls; They call for my surrender. I reply, "Give quarter now? Not I."
They've shot my flag to ribbons, but in rents It floats above the height; Their ensign shall not crown my battlements While I can stand and fight. I fling defiance at them as I cry, "Capitulate? Not I."
PRINTED BY HAZELL, WATSON AND VINEY, LD. LONDON AND AYLESBURY ENGLAND.
# Flint and Feather (1914)/Part 2/The Songster

THE SONGSTER
Music, music with throb and swing, Of a plaintive note, and long; 'Tis a note no human throat could sing, No harp with its dulcet golden string,— Nor lute, nor lyre with liquid ring, Is sweet as the robin's song.
He sings for love of the season When the days grow warm and long, For the beautiful God-sent reason That his breast was born for song.
Calling, calling so fresh and clear, Through the song-sweet days of May; Warbling there, and whistling here, He swells his voice on the drinking ear, On the great, wide, pulsing atmosphere Till his music drowns the day.
He sings for love of the season When the days grow warm and long, For the beautiful God-sent reason That his breast was born for song.
# Flint and Feather (1914)/Part 3/Calgary of the Plains

CALGARY OF THE PLAINS
Not of the seething cities with their swarming human hives, Their fetid airs, their reeking streets, their dwarfed and poisoned lives, Not of the buried yesterdays, but of the days to be, The glory and the gateway of the yellow West is she.
The Northern Lights dance down her plains with soft and silvery feet, The sunrise gilds her prairies when the dawn and daylight meet; Along her level lands the fitful southern breezes sweep, And beyond her western windows the sublime old mountains sleep.
The Redman haunts her portals, and the Paleface treads her streets, The Indian's stealthy footstep with the course of commerce meets, And hunters whisper vaguely of the half forgotten tales Of phantom herds of bison lurking on her midnight trails.
Not hers the lore of olden lands, their laurels and their bays; But what are these, compared to one of all her perfect days? For naught can buy the jewel that upon her forehead lies— The cloudless sapphire Heaven of her territorial skies.