OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/6th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 40

Chap. XL.—An Act supplementary to the laws now in force, fixing the Compensations of the officers of the Senate and House of Representatives.
Act of April 29, 1802, ch. 35. Compensation to the officers of the Senate and House of Representatives. Vol. i. 448.Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the thirty-first day of December, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-nine, the officers of the Senate and House of Representatives, herein after mentioned, shall be, and hereby are entitled to receive, in addition to their compensations as now fixed by law, the following sums, that is to say: The Secretary of the Senate, and Clerk of the House of Representatives, two hundred and fifty dollars each, in addition to their salaries as at present established by law; and each of their principal and engrossing clerks, in addition to their per diem allowance as established by law, two hundred dollars per annum.
Sergeant-at-arms and doorkeepers.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the sergeant-at-arms of the Senate, who also performs the duty of doorkeeper, the sergeant-at-arms of the House of Representatives, and the doorkeeper of the House of Representatives, shall be and hereby are entitled to receive five hundred dollars per annum each, and two dollars a day during the session; and the assistant doorkeepers of the Senate and House of Representatives four hundred and fifty dollars per annum each, and two dollars per day during the session, in lieu of the compensations heretofore established by law, which compensations shall commence from the commencement of the present session.
Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That this act shall continue in force for and during the term of two years and no longer.
Approved, May 2, 1800.
# Urbs Sacra Æterna

* "Urbs Sacra Æterna" in The Writings of Oscar Wilde (1907)
* "Urbs Sacra Æterna" in The Poems of Oscar Wilde (1909)
# United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (234 U.S. 495)

United States Supreme Court
234 U.S. 495
United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (234 U.S. 495)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Interstate Commerce
Commission, et al., Appts.,
v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY et al.
No. 163.
Nos. 137 and 163.
Argued February 23, 26, and 27, 1912.
Ordered on April 8, 1912, for reargument before full bench.
Reargued October 18, 21, and 22, 1912.
Decided June 22, 1914.
Former Attorney General Wickersham, Assistant to the Attorney General Fowler, and Mr. Blackburn Esterline for the United States on original argument.
Mr. Patrick J. Farrell for the Interstate Commerce Commission.
Messrs. F. C. Dillard, Robert Dunlap, E. C. Lindley, Maxwell Evarts, Gardiner Lathrop, Charles W. Bunn, and Charles Donnelly for appellees.
Messrs. Stephen A. Foster, William E. Lamb, Rush C. Butler, and Cornelius Lynde for appellant, the Chicago Association of Commerce.
Messrs. H. M. Stephens and J. B. Campbell for appellants the City of Spokane et al.
Messrs. Joseph N. Teal and Wirt Minor for interveners, the Portland Chamber of Commerce et al.
Former Attorney General Wickersham, Assistant to the Attorney General Fowler, and Mr. Blackburn Esterline for the United States on reargument.
Mr. P. J. Farrell for the Interstate Commerce Commission.
Messrs. Rush C. Butler, William E. Lamb, Stephen A. Foster, and Cornelius Lynde for appellant the Chicago Association of Commerce.
Mr. Joseph N. Teal for interveners, the Portland Chamber of Commerce et al.
Mr. J. B. Campbell for appellants the City of Spokane et al.
Mr. F. C. Dillard for appellees.
Mr. Alfred P. Thom as amicus curioe.
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (234 U.S. 495)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
234 U.S. 495
United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (234 U.S. 495)
The eleven carriers who are appellees on this record filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission applications to be relieved from the long and short haul clause of § 4 of the act to regulate commerce [24 Stat. at L. 380, chap. 104, U.S.C.omp. Stat. 1901, p. 3155], as amended by the act of June 18, 1910, chap. 309, 36 Stat. at L. 547, U.S.C.omp. Stat. Supp. 1911, p. 1288. After full hearing the Commission entered an order granting in certain respects the relief prayed, but establishing a proportionate relation to be maintained between the lower rate for the longer haul and the higher rate for the shorter haul upon the basis of percentages which were fixed with reference to defined zones. The carriers refused to obey the order, and filed their bill in the commerce court to enjoin its enforcement. An interlocutory injunction was ordered. The defendants moved to dismiss, and, on the overruling of the motions, appealed from the interlocutory order, that case being No. 137. Subsequently, upon the election of the defendants not to plead further, a final decree was entered and appealed from, that appeal being No. 163.
These cases are governed by the opinion in Nos. 136 and 162, just decided [[[234 U.S. 476]], 58 L. ed. --, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 986]. They were tried in the court below with the other cases, were decided by the same opinion, and, although different localities are involved, the questions presented are identical, and for the reasons given in the other cases, Nos. 136 and 162, the decree must be reversed and remanded to the proper district court with directions to dismiss the bill for want of equity.
Reversed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (91 U.S. 72)
* United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (98 U.S. 569)
* United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (226 U.S. 61)
* United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (226 U.S. 470)
* United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (234 U.S. 495)
* United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (249 U.S. 354)
* United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (353 U.S. 112)
See also Union Pacific Railroad Company v. United States.
# United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (226 U.S. 470)

United States Supreme Court
226 U.S. 470
United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Argued: December 19, 1912. --- Decided: January 6, 1913
Attorney General Wickersham for the United States.
Messrs. John C. Spooner, John G. Milburn, Maxwell Evarts, and N. H. Loomis for the Union P. R. Co. and the Oregon Short Line R. Co.
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (226 U.S. 61)

United States Supreme Court
226 U.S. 61
United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Argued: April 19, 22, and 23, 1912. --- Decided: December 2, 1912
[Syllabus from pages 61-64 intentionally omitted]
Attorney General Wickersham and Messrs. Cordenio A. Severance and Frank B. Kellogg, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 64-68 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. P. F. Dunne and N. H. Loomis for appellees.
Mr. Paul D. Cravath for appellees Jacob H. Schiff and Otto H. Kahn.
Mr. James M. Beck for appellee James Stillman.
Messrs. H. F. Stambaugh and D. T. Watson for appellee Henry C. Frick.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 68-79 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (249 U.S. 354)

United States Supreme Court
249 U.S. 354
United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (249 U.S. 354)
Argued: Jan. 30, 1919. --- Decided: March 31, 1919
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Brown, for the United States.
Messrs. William R. Harr and Charles H. Bates, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (353 U.S. 112)

United States Supreme Court
353 U.S. 112
United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (353 U.S. 112)
Argued: Jan. 23, 1957. --- Decided: April 8, 1957
Mr. J. Lee Rankin, Sol. Gen., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. William W. Clary, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/13th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 51

Chap. LI.—An Act requiring the Secretary of the Senate and Clerk of the House of Representatives in the Congress of the United States, to give security for the faithful application and disbursement of the contingent funds of the Senate and House of Representatives.
Secretary of Senate and clerk of the House of Representatives to give bond, &c.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That it shall be the duty of the secretary of the Senate and clerk of the House of Representatives respectively, within ten days after the passage of this act, to give bond to the United States, with one or more sureties, to be approved by the comptroller of the treasury; each bond in the penal sum of twenty ​thousand dollars, with condition for the faithful application and disbursement of such contingent funds of the respective houses, as shall come into their hands, which bonds shall be deposited in the comptroller’s office: And it shall be the duty of each and every secretary of the Senate, and clerk of the House of Representatives, who may hereafter be chosen, to give bond as aforesaid, within thirty days after he enters upon the discharge of the duties of his said office.
To deposit in the banks of the District of Columbia the public moneys in their hands.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That from and after the passage of this act, it shall be the duty of the secretary of the Senate, and of the clerk of the House of Representatives, to deposit all money belonging to the United States, which may come into their hands, in one of the Banks in the District of Columbia; and all debts payable by said secretary or clerk, on account of the Senate or House of Representatives, shall be paid by a draft in favour of each creditor on the bank, where the money of government may be deposited.
Approved, February 23, 1815.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/13th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 54

Chap. LIV.—An Act for the regulation of the courts of justice of Indiana.
Courts in the Indiana territory.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the judges of the general court of the Indiana territory, shall, in each and every year, hold two sessions of the said court, at Vincennes, in the county of Knox, on the first Mondays of February and September; at Corydon, in the county of Harrison, on the third Mondays in February and September; and at Brookville, in the county of Franklin, on the first Mondays next succeeding the fourth Mondays of February and September, which courts respectively shall be composed of at least two of the judges appointed by the government of the United States; and no person or persons, acting under the authority and appointment of the said territory, shall be associated with the said judges.
Approved, February 24, 1815.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/13th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 61

Chap. LXI.—An Act to provide additional revenues for defraying the expenses of government, and maintaining the public credit, by laying a duty on gold, silver and plated ware, and jewelry and pastework, manufactured within the United States.
Duty upon gold, silver, and plated ware.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the eighteenth day of April next, there shall be paid upon all gold, silver, and plated ware, and jewelry and pastework, except timepieces, which shall thereafter be manufactured or made for sale within the United States or the territories thereof, a duty of six per centum ad valorem, by the manufacturer thereof.
Regulations concerning the tax. Act of Jan. 18, 1815, ch. 23.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the duty aforesaid shall be imposed, paid, collected, and accounted for, in like manner, and subject to the like provisions and penalties, as the duties imposed by the “Act to provide additional revenues for defraying the expenses of government, and maintaining the public credit, by laying duties on various goods, wares, and merchandise, manufactures within the United States,” passed the eighteenth day of January, one thousand eight hundred and fifteen, all the provisions of which act shall apply to the duty hereby imposed, and to those by whom it shall be payable, the same as if it were specifically inserted among the dutiable objects enumerated in the first section thereof.
Approved, February 27, 1815.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/13th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 48

Chap. XLVIII.—An Act giving further time to complete the surveys and obtain the patents for lands located under Virginia resolution warrants.
Act of March 3, 1807, ch. 31. Act of April 11, 1818, ch. 43. Act of Feb. 9, 1821, ch. 11. Act of March 1, 1823, ch. 38.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the officers and soldiers of the Virginia line on continental establishment, or their legal representatives, to whom land warrants have issued by virtue of any resolution of the legislature of Virginia, as a bounty for services, which by the laws of Virginia, passed prior to the cession of the north-western territory to the United States, entitled such officers or soldiers to bounty lands and whose location of such warrants shall have been made prior to the twenty-third day of March, one thousand eight [hundred] and eleven, shall be allowed the further time of two years from the passing of this act to complete their surveys and obtain their patents for the land located as aforesaid: Provided, That surveys shall be made and patents granted on the aforesaid locations, under the same regulations, restrictions and provisions, in every respect, as were prescribed for the making of surveys and granting of patents by the act, entitledAct of March 3, 1807, ch. 31. “An act authorizing patents to issue for lands located and surveyed by virtue of certain ‘Virginia resolution warrants,’” passed the third day of March, one thousand eight hundred and seven.
Approved, February 22, 1815.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/13th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 6

Chap. VI.—An Act to authorize the publication of the laws of the United States within the territories of the United States.
Laws of the United States to be published in each and every territory of the United States.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the secretary of the Department of State be, and he is hereby authorized to cause the laws of the United States, passed, or to be passed, during the present or any future session of Congress, to be published in two public newspapers ​within each and every territory of the United States:—Provided, in his opinion, it shall become necessary and expedient.
Approved, November 21, 1814.
# Walker v. United States (71 U.S. 163)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
71 U.S. 163
Walker v. United States
THE United States had recovered judgment against Walker in the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, 'for the sum of $2000, with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent.,' &c., and the case was now here on writ of error. Mr. Ashton, Assistant Attorney-General, citing the twenty-second section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, which gives a right to review in this court over judgments of the Circuit Courts 'where the matter in dispute exceeds the sum or value of $2000,' now moved to dismiss the writ; the matter in dispute, as he argued, not exceeding $2000, but being just equal to it. He observed that in Knapp v. Banks, in this court, where the motion was to dismiss a writ where the judgment was for $1720, but with interest added exceeded $2000, the court granting the motion had indeed said in its order, 'that where the plaintiff in the court below claims $2000 or more, and the ruling is for a less sum, he is entitled to a writ.' But this, the counsel argued, was said obiter only, and could not be maintained.
No one appeared against the motion.
The CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

* ↑ 2 Howard, 73.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walker v. Turner

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
22 U.S. 541
Walker v. Turner
March 19th.
Mr. Justice WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walker v. United States (372 U.S. 526)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 526
J. L. WALKER v. UNITED STATES, et al.
No. 657.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walker v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Walker v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Walker v. United States (71 U.S. 163)
* Walker v. United States (372 U.S. 526)
See also United States v. Walker.
# Walker v. United States (372 U.S. 526)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 526
J. L. WALKER v. UNITED STATES, et al.
No. 657.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS.
208 F. Supp. 388, affirmed.
Henry W. Moursund, Maynard F. Robinson and R. Dean Moorhead for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Irwin A. Seibel and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and George Nokes, Roland Rice, Carl Wright Johnson and Nat L. Hardy for Central Freight Lines Inc. et al., appellees.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Villette (1st edition)

The omission of Chapters 15 and 29 is consistent with this edition: there were no such chapters.
VILLETTE.
By CURRER BELL,
AUTHOR OF "JANE EYRE," "SHIRLEY," ETC.
IN THREE VOLUMES.
VOL. I.
LONDON: SMITH, ELDER & CO., 65, CORNHILL.
SMITH, TAYLOR & CO., BOMBAY.
1853.
The Author of this work reserves the right of translating it.
London: Printed by Stewart and Murray, Old Bailey.
CONTENTS OF VOL. I.
| Chapter | | Page |
| I.— | Bretton | 1 |
| II.— | Paulina | 15 |
| III.— | The Playmates | 28 |
| IV.— | Miss Marchmont | 61 |
| V.— | Turning a New Leaf | 77 |
| VI.— | London | 86 |
| VII.— | Villette | 109 |
| VIII.— | Madame Beck | 127 |
| IX.— | Isidore | 155 |
| X.— | Dr. John | 177 |
| XI.— | The Portresse's Cabinet | 191 |
| XII.— | The Casket | 204 |
| XIII.— | A Sneeze out of Season | 225 |
| XIV.— | The Fête | 245 |
| XVI.— | The Long Vacation | 301 |
CONTENTS OF VOL. II.
| Chapter | | Page |
| XVII.— | Auld Lang Syne | 1 |
| XVIII.— | La Terrasse | 29 |
| XIX.— | We quarrel | 47 |
| XX.— | The Cleopatra | 61 |
| XXI.— | The Concert | 85 |
| XXII.— | Reaction | 126 |
| XXIII.— | The Letter | 160 |
| XXIV.— | Vashti | 179 |
| XXV.— | M. de Bassompierre | 205 |
| XXVI.— | The Little Countess | 232 |
| XXVII.— | A Burial | 259 |
| XXVIII.— | The Hotel Crécy | 288 |
CONTENTS OF VOL. III.
| Chapter | | Page |
| XXX.— | The Watchguard | 1 |
| XXXI.— | Monsieur's Fête | 25 |
| XXXII.— | M. Paul | 52 |
| XXXIII.— | The Dryad | 73 |
| XXXIV.— | The First Letter | 94 |
| XXXV.— | M. Paul keeps his Promise | 112 |
| XXXVI.— | Malevola | 129 |
| XXXVII.— | Fraternity | 152 |
| XXXVIII.— | The Apple of Discord | 176 |
| XXXIX.— | Sunshine | 204 |
| XL.— | Cloud | 234 |
| XLI.— | Old and New Acquaintance | 281 |
| XLII.— | The Happy Pair | 303 |
| XVIII.— | Faubourg Clotilde | 316 |
| XLIV.— | Finis | 344 |