OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# I held a Jewel in my fingers—

* "The Lost Jewel" in Poems: Second Series (1891)
* "I held a jewel in my fingers" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# Jackson v. United States (281 U.S. 344)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
281 U.S. 344
Jackson v. United States (281 U.S. 344)
Argued: March 4, 5, 1930. ---
Mr. Thomas Amory Lee, of Topeka, Kan., for petitioner.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jacksonville, Mayport, Pablo Railway & Navigation Company v. Hooper

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
160 U.S. 514
Jacksonville, Mayport, Pablo Railway & Navigation Company v. Hooper
In the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of Florida, on the 4th day of December, 1889, Mary J. Hooper, Henry H. Hooper, her husband, and William F. Porter, for the use of said Mary J. Hooper, citizens of the state of Ohio, brought an action against the Jacksonville, Mayport, Pablo Railway & Navigation Company, a corporation of the state of Florida. The plaintiffs' amended declaration set up causes of action arising out of the covenants contained in a certain indenture of lease between the parties. This lease, dated July 10, 1888, purported to grant, for a term of two years, certain lots of land situated at a place called 'Burnside,' in Duval county, Fla., whereon was erected an hotel known as the 'San Diego Hotel.' In consideration of this grant, the railroad company agreed to pay, in monthly installments, a yearly rent of $800, and to keep the premises insured in the sum of $6,000.
It was alleged that on November 28, 1889, during said term, and while the railway company was in possession, the hotel and other buildings were wholly destroyed by fire; that the defendant had failed and neglected to have the same insured; and that there was an arrearage of rent due amounting to the sum of $106.67. For the amount of the loss occasioned by the absence of insurance, and for the back rent, the action was brought.
The defendant denied that the railway company had duly executed the instrument sued on; denied that Alexander Wallace, the president of the company, and who had executed the lease as such president, had any authority from the company so to do. The defendant also alleged that such a lease, even if formally executed, was ultra vires; also, that the covenant to insure was an impossible covenant, as shown by ineffectual efforts to secure such insurance.
The case was tried in April, 1891, and resulted in a verdict and judgment against the defendant in the sum of $6,798.70. On errors assigned to certain rulings of the court and in the charge to the jury, the case was brought to this court.
J. C. Cooper, for plaintiff in error.
James R. Challen, for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice SHIRAS, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jacksonville Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
118 U.S. 626
Jacksonville Company v. United States
S. M. Lake, S. F. Phillips, and A. J. Willard, for appellant.
E. M. Watson, for the United States.
FIELD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jackson v. Vanhorn

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
JACKSON et al. Exors. verʃus VANHORN
J
Lewis, for the Plaintiff, faid, that he did not mean to conteft the matter, but he wifhed it to be fettled, whether the miftake of an Attorney, was, in fuch cafes, fufficient to fet afide a judgment.
by the court On a miftake of this kind, evidently appearing, we cannot refufe the motion.
# Jackson v. United States (281 U.S. 344)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
281 U.S. 344
Jackson v. United States (281 U.S. 344)
Argued: March 4, 5, 1930. ---
This action was brought in the United States Court for Kansas to recover for permanent total disability on a war risk insurance policy. The court gave plaintiff judgment for the amount of the accrued installments with interest on each to date of the judgment, and directed that the judgment bear interest until paid. (D. C.) 24 F.(2d) 981. The United States took the case to the Circuit Court of Appeals and there contended that plaintiff was not entitled to interest. The Circuit Court of Appeals rightly reversed the judgment. 34 F. (2d) 241.
The case is ruled by this court's decision on the third question certified in United States v. Worley, 281 U.S. 339, 50 S.C.t. 291, 74 L. Ed. -, announced this day.
Judgment affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jackson v. United States (376 U.S. 503)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
376 U.S. 503
Jackson v. United States (376 U.S. 503)
Argued: March 4, 1964. --- Decided: March 23, 1964
Paul Burks, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners.
John B. Jones, Jr., Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# International Shoe Company v. Federal Trade Commission

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
280 U.S. 291
International Shoe Company v. Federal Trade Commission
Argued: Dec. 2, 3, 1929. --- Decided: Jan 6, 1930
[Syllabus from pages 291-293 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Charles Nagel, J. D. Williamson, and Frank Y. Gladney, all of St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner.
Mr. John Lord O'Brian, Asst. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# International Salt Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, news, Wikidata item.
International Salt Co. v. United States, 332 U.S. 392 (1947), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the Sherman Act prohibits as per se violations all tying arrangements in which a product for which a seller has a legal monopoly, such as a patent, requires purchasers to also buy a product for which the seller has no legal monopoly. Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Concurrence/Dissent

    Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
332 U.S. 392
International Salt Company v. United States
Argued: Oct. 16, 1947. --- Decided: Nov 10, 1947
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Mr. Lemuel Skidmore, of New York City, for appellant.
Mr. Robert L. Stern, of Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kaiser v. New York

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
394 U.S. 280
Kaiser v. New York
Argued: Jan. 16, 1969. --- Decided: March 24, 1969
See 394 U.S. 1025, 89 S.Ct 1622.
Peter L. F. Sabbatino, New York City, for petitioner.
Henry J. Boitel, New York City, for petitioner, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court.
William Cahn, Mineola, N.Y., for respondent.
Mr. Justice STEWART delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kalanianaole v. Smithies

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
226 U.S. 462
Kalanianaole v. Smithies
Argued: and submitted December 20, 1912. --- Decided: January 6, 1913
Mr. C. W. Ashford for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Ralph P. Quarles and A. L. C. Atkinson for defendant in error.
Memorandum opinion by direction of the court. By Mr. Justice Holmes:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kalb v. Feuerstein

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
308 U.S. 433
Kalb v. Feuerstein
Argued: Dec. 15, 1939. --- Decided: Jan 2, 1940
See 291 N.W. 840; 291 N.W. 841.
Messrs. William Lemke, of Fargo, N.D., and Elmer McClain, of Lima, Ohio, for appellants.
Messrs. J. Arthur Moran, of Delavan, Wis., and Arthur T. Thorson, of Elkhorn, Wis., for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from page 434 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kaiser Wilhelm's Proclamation to the Army nearing defeat II

This appeal was given by the Kaiser to a beleaguered army on 10 October 1918, six days after the Reichstag was advised to negotiate peace settlements. It had been preceded two days earlier by an earlier, similar speech. As appearing in the 1923 Source Records of the Great War, Vol. VI, edited by Charles F. Horne.
The hour is grave!
We are fighting for the future of the Fatherland and for the protection of the soil of the Homeland. To that end we need the united action of the intellectual, moral, and economic powers of Germany.
On the co-operation of those powers our invincibility rests. The will for defence must bind all separate views and separate wishes into one great unity of conception.
God grant us something of the spirit of the war of liberation.
       WILHELM
# Kaiser Wilhelm's Proclamation to the Army nearing defeat

This appeal was given by the Kaiser to a beleaguered army on 6 October 1918, four days after the Reichstag was advised to negotiate peace settlements. It was followed two days later by a follow-up speech. As appearing in the 1923 Source Records of the Great War, Vol. VI, edited by Charles F. Horne.
For months past the enemy, with enormous exertions and almost without pause in the fighting, has stormed against your lines.
In weeks of the struggle, often without repose, you have had to persevere and resist a numerically far superior enemy. Therein lies the greatness of the task which has been set for you and which you are fulfilling. Troops of all the German States are doing their part and are heroically defending the Fatherland on foreign soil. Hard is the task.
My navy is holding its own against the united enemy naval forces and is unwaveringly supporting the army in its difficult struggle.
The eyes of those at home rest with pride and admiration on the deeds of the army and navy. I express to you the thanks of myself and the Fatherland.
The collapse of the Macedonian front has occurred in the midst of the hardest struggle. In accord with our allies, I have resolved once more to offer peace to the enemy, but I will only extend my hand for an honourable peace. We owe that to the heroes who have laid down their lives for the Fatherland, and we make that our duty to our children.
Whether arms will be lowered still is a question. Until then we must not slacken. We must, as hitherto, exert all our strength tirelessly to hold our ground against the onslaught of our enemies.
The hour is grave, but, trusting in your strength and in God's gracious help, we feel ourselves to be strong enough to defend our beloved Fatherland.
       WILHELM
# Kalanianaole v. Smithies/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
226 U.S. 462
Kalanianaole v. Smithies
Argued: and submitted December 20, 1912. --- Decided: January 6, 1913
This is a suit on a deficiency judgment rendered upon foreclosure of the mortgage that was under consideration in Kawananakoa v. Polyblank, 205 U.S. 349, 51 L. ed. 834, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 526. The judgment was in favor of Polyblank, trustee, and Cockett, sole beneficiary, against Kawananakoa and the plaintiff in error Kalanianaole. Before the present suit was begun, the trustee resigned, Smithies was duly appointed successor in the trust, and the former trustee assigned the judgment to him. Smithies and his beneficiary then brought this action against the plaintiff in error and the executor of Kawananakoa, who had died. The executor demurred and had judgment. The plaintiff in error then answered, setting up the discharge of the executor and that the plaintiffs allowed the claim against the latter to be barred by time before bringing suit. The case was heard upon mutual admission of the facts set up in the declaration and answer. In argument the plaintiff in error also objects that only the original judgment creditors could sue. Both objections were sufficiently answered in the court below. That, as to the plaintiffs, is pure matter of form, on which we should not go behind the local practice. The whole interest in the judgment was before the court. As to the second, the judgment was sued upon as a joint judgment, but it ceased to be joint by the death of one of the parties bound, as is the nature of joint obligations. Edsar v. Smart, T. Raym. 26; Y. B. 3 Edw. III. 11, pl. 37. See Towers v. Moor, 2 Vern. 99. The joinder of the executor was simply a mistake that did no harm. See William W. Bierce v. Hutchins, 205 U.S. 340, 347, 51 L. ed. 828, 833, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 524.
Judgment affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Impeachment: I'm Asking You. Do You Think It's Time?

March 19, 2007
My fellow Americans. We are in an interesting condition in this country, where we are told to take impeachment off the table and keep on the table a U.S. military attack against Iran.
This really calls for a new thinking. It calls for us to reconsider very deeply the moment that we're in -- where our Constitution is being trashed, where international law is being violated, where our hopes and dreams for the education of our children, for the health of our people, for housing, for our veterans are being set aside as we go deeper and deeper into war.
We need a whole discussion in America. And with your help, we're about to have one. This past week in the Congress of the United States, I noted that the administration has threatened aggressive war against Iran. This is a violation of the UN charter. Charters are treaties. Article 6 of the Constitution of the United States says that treaties are the law of our land, the supreme law of our land. It's illegal to threaten aggressive war against another nation.
Iran has no ability to attack us, and they do not have the intention to attack the United States. We are at a moment in human history where we have to make a decision whether we are going to go deeper into war or whether we are going to take a stand on behalf of peace. I determined a long time ago to take that stand on behalf of peace. And I want to enlist you and enroll you in taking that same stand. We cannot let this administration go any deeper into this journey, into destroying democratic governance, trashing our Constitution, forgetting the very purpose of this nation.
America was never meant to be a nation forever on the warpath. It was meant to be a nation which also had the capacity to “Promote the General Welfare.” We need to reevaluate the direction of this administration by looking at its conduct in office, by determining whether it has faithfully followed the laws of our nation. I'm prepared to start that process. I began this week with a speech on the floor of the House, which warned the administration that its actions toward Iran already constitute a case to ask the question about impeachment.
So I'm asking you, what do you think? Do you think it's time?
# Imp of the Perverse

* The Imp of the Perverse (1850)
* "The Imp of the Perverse", illustrated by Arthur Rackham, in Poe's Tales of Mystery and Imagination (1935)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Imperial Dictionary of Universal Biography

a series of original memoirs of distinguished men, of all ages and all nations. By writers of eminence in the various branches of literature, science, and art. Conducted by Professor John Eadie, John Francis Waller [and others] John Francis Waller, ed.
* VOLUME 1 (transcription project)
* VOLUME 2 (transcription project) (transcription project)
* VOLUME 3 (transcription project) (transcription project)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Imperial Dictionary of Universal Biography/Bramah, Joseph

​BRAMAH, Joseph, whose name is known in connection with numerous mechanical improvements, was born at Stainborough, Yorkshire, in 1749. He was apprenticed to a carpenter in his native place, and having served his apprenticeship, he removed to London, and ere long began business as a cabinetmaker. Having shown great aptitude for mechanical invention, by some improvements which he effected in the construction of water-closets, he devoted himself to that branch of labour. His next invention, which he patented in 1784, was an improvement on the construction of the lock, rendering it more inviolable. Perhaps his most important achievement was the construction of a hydraulic press, acting on the principle of the hydrostatic paradox, which produced great force, and could be conveniently applied to many useful purposes. Its power was tested in Holt Forest, Hampshire, where 300 of the largest trees were raised from the ground by its means, managed by only two men. Bramah erected at Woolwich arsenal a machine for planing timber, moved by this power, which acted with great rapidity and exactness. In 1807 he invented, for the bank of England, a machine for numbering and dating their notes, which effected a great saving of time and labour. He died in 1814, in consequence of cold caught in Holt Forest, while superintending his experiments there. Mr. Bramah left "A Dissertation on the Construction of Locks," and "A Letter on the subject of an alleged Violation of Patents."—J. B.
# Immured in Heaven!

Immured in Heaven! What a Cell! Let every Bondage be, Thou sweetest of the Universe, Like that which ravished thee!
# Journal of Discourses/Volume 5

(Online document scan of Journal of Discourses, Volume 5)
Journal of Discourses Volume 5
DELIVERED BY PRESIDENT BRIGHAM YOUNG,
HIS TWO COUNSELLORS, THE TWELVE APOSTLES, AND OTHERS.
REPORTED BY G. D. WATT, J. V. LONG, AND OTHERS
AND HUMBLY DEDICATED TO THE LATTER-DAY SAINTS IN ALL THE WORLD.
VOL. V.
LIVERPOOL: EDITED AND PUBLISHED BY ASA CALKIN, 42, ISLINGTON.
LONDON: LATTER-DAY SAINTS' BOOK DEPOT, 35, JEWIN STREET CITY.
1858.
Preface
This Number completes the Fifth Volume of the Journal of Discourses.
At the close of the last Volume it was not unlikely that the source from whence the Journal is supplied would be beyond our reach at the needful time, or that important events would hush for a season the oracles of God. But from the number of Discourses delivered during the latter part of last year and the early part of this, previous to the absorbing events succeeding, we have thus been enabled to complete the present Volume.
It is unnecessary for us to dwell on the importance of the Discourses contained herein and the value of this Volume to the Saints' library, seeing that it represents a part of the most trying season of the Church. We therefore commend it to its readers without further preface, and we are confident that in years to come the value of the Fifth Volume to its possessors will be enhanced.
THE PUBLISHER.
# Letters from John Curtis to Alexander Henry Haliday 2nd December 1837

2nd December 1837 It has for several years been my wish to pay you the only public testimony in my power of my regard by dedicating a volumne of my work to you. The many and essential services you have rendered that work during its progress would entitle you to such a compliment were you only a correspondent and the numerous proofs I had of your kindness and friend-ship make me only regret that it will not be better with your acceptance. I assure you one of the greatest pleasures in the progress of my great undertaking has been the associating my name with those whom I esteem and who like myself fare devote to the study of our branch of Natural History I may have only two more opportunities of thus gratifying myself and I shall be truly happy if they afford me the same unmixed pleasures as the present one does…..
# Letters from India Volume II/To the Hon and Rev Robert Eden 3

Calcutta, April 20, 1840.
My dearest Robert,—The weather has till yesterday been quite delightful these last three weeks. I really am not joking, but the storms, which are unpleasant at sea, save all our lives on shore, and I could not have believed that Bengal could have been so cool at any time of year. On Monday and Tuesday I had a good thick shawl to go out in. I am afraid it is hotting up again now, but in the meanwhile we have got over a great bit of the worst time of year without any suffering.
All our gentlemen, who have been quartered up the country the last few years, are astonished at the pleasant weather compared to the hot winds. I look upon it as another sign that we are certainly to go home next year, and that India means to leave a favourable impression.
George went yesterday on his way here to give the prizes at the Medical College, and he did. Five of the students received their diplomas to practise as surgeons, &c., and when he gave them ​he shook hands with them and said that, as they were now members of a learned profession, he considered them as gentlemen, and hoped their future conduct, &c. &c. These make ten young Hindus who have qualified themselves to act as surgeons. The five who went out last year are getting on wonderfully. The one who was sent to Agra began with five patients, and now has a hundred daily. Certainly education is progressing rapidly here, and must do great good in a worldly sense, and eventually in a higher way.
Love to all.
Yours most affectionately,
E.E.