OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Southern Historical Society Papers/Volume 04/August/Causes of the Defeat of Gen. Lee's Army at the Battle of Gettysburg

SOUTHERN HISTORICAL SOCIETY PAPERS.
Causes of the Defeat of Gen. Lee's Army at the Battle of Gettysburg—Opinions of Leading Confederate Soldiers.
In February last the Secretary received a letter from a distinguished foreign military critic propounding a series of questions as to the causes of the failure of the Confederate army to win the battle of Gettysburg, and requesting us to obtain the opinions of leading Confederates who were participants in that great battle. We at once had twenty copies of the letter made, and sent them to representatives of every corps and division and every arm of the service of the Army of Northern Virginia. We have received a number of replies, and have the promise of several others, and we are sure that our readers will agree with us that the series of papers form the most valuable contribution to the history of that great campaign which has yet been published.
As the letter of our distinguished correspondent was not intended for publication, we suppress both the letter and the name of the writer. But we would be recreant to the cause of truth did we withhold the able, interesting and valuable papers which we have received in response to this letter.
There are, as will be seen, honest differences of opinion between the writers of these papers in reference to certain points; but we shall publish them without alteration, just as they are received from the accomplished soldiers who have prepared them.
We print the papers also in the order in which they have been received:
# Southern Historical Society Papers/Volume 04/July

Volume 4, Issue 1
* Battle of Kelleysville—Reports of Stuart and Fitz. Lee
* Stuart's Report of Chancellorsville
* General S. D. Lee's Report of the Siege of Vicksburg
* Defence of Battery Gregg and Evacuation of Petersburg
* Gen. Lee's Strength and Losses at Petersburg
* Confederate Loss at Seven Pines—Letter from Gen. J. E. Johnston
* A Slander Refuted
* Editorial Paragraphs
# Southern Historical Society Papers/Volume 04/July/A Slander Refuted

Southern Historical Society Papers, July 1877
A Slander Refuted.
[It has been suggested that we ought to put in permanent form the follow refutation of a slander against General Carter Stevenson and his brave men, which we felt called on to make at the time:]
Office Southern Historical Society, Richmond, January 25, 1876.
Editors Dispatch:
We have in our Archives the following official document, which completely refutes Mr. Blaine's statement that Gen. Grant told him that he fought at Chattanooga Gen. Carter Stevenson's division, which had been captured at Vicksburg, and had not been exchanged:
Adjutant and Inspector-General's Office, Richmond, September 16, 1863.
General Orders, No. 123.
The following order is published for the information of all concerned:
Exchange Notice, No. 6.
The following Confederate officers and men, captured at Vicksburg, Miss., July 4, 1863, and subsequently paroled, have been duly exchanged, and are hereby so declared:
1. The officers and men of Gen. C. L. Stevenson's division. 2. The officers and men of Gen. Bowen's division. 3. The officers and men of Brig.-Gen. Moore's brigade. 4. The officers and men of the Second Texas regiment. 5. The officers and men of Waul's legion. 6. Also, all Confederate officers and men who have been delivered at City Point at anytime previous to July 25th, 1863, have been duly exchanged, and are hereby so declared.
Ro. Ould, Agent of Exchange.
Richmond, September 12, 1863.
By order:S. Cooper, Adjutant and Inspector-General.
On page 74 of General Boynton's book ("Sherman's Historical Raid") the following telegram from Gen. Halleck, at Washington, to Burnside, in East Tennessee, is given:
"September 18, ——.
* * * "A part at least of Longstreet's corps is going to Atlanta. It is believed that Bragg, Johnston, and Hardee, with the exchanged prisoners from Vicksburg and Port Hudson, are concentrating against Rosecrans. You must give him all the aid you can." [Italics ours.]
Either Mr. Blaine is mistaken, therefore, in giving General Grant as his authority for saying that these high-toned gentlemen and gallant soldiers violated their paroles, or else General Grant's memory is at variance with the facts.
J. William Jones, Secretary Southern Historical Society.
# Surrexit Christus hodie

Anonymous Bohemian Easter hymn, dating to the 14th century. It was popularly translated into German as Erstanden ist der heilige Christ; several English translations are based on this translation.
English-language translations of Surrexit Christus hodie include:
* "Jesus Christ Is Risen Today", anonymous (1708).
** "Christ the Lord Is Risen Today", expanded variant by Charles Wesley (1739).
* "Christ our Lord is Risen to Day", anonymous (1708, from the German).
* "Today the Victor o'er His foes" by John Mason Neale (1851).
* "Lo! Christ is risen this day, and brings" by J. W. Hewett (1859).
# Surprised by Joy (Wordsworth)

* Surprized by joy—impatient as the Wind (Surprized by joy—impatient as the Wind) in Poems (1815) Volume II.
* "Surprised by Joy, Impatient as the Wind" in Littell's Living Age, 144 (1865) (1880)
# Surrender (Brownell)

The text is taken from McClure's Magazine/Volume 1, Number 4, September 1893, p.308. The author's name appears as "Gertrude Hall".
Then lead me, Friend. Here is my hand,  Not in dumb resignation lent, Because thee one cannot withstand—  In love, Lord, with complete consent.
Lead—and I, not as one born blind  Obeys in sheer necessity, But one with muffled eyes designed,  Will blindly trust myself to thee.
Lead.—Though the road thou mak'st me tread  Bring sweat of anguish to my brow, And on the flints my track be red,  I will not murmur—it is thou.
Lead.—If we come to the cliff's crest,  And I hear deep below—oh, deep!— The torrent's roar, and "Leap!" thou sayst,  I will not question—I will leap.
# Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Act 2015 (Version 22)/Section 2

2Commencement
This Act comes into force on the day after the date on which it receives the Royal assent.
# Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Act 2015 (Version 22)/Section 6

6Repeal
The Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Act 2014 (2014 No 70) is repealed.
# Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Act 2015 (Version 22)/Section 8

8Animal Products Act 1999
The following regulations are confirmed:
(a)Animal Products (Fees, Charges, and Levies) Amendment Regulations 2015 (LI 2015/94):
(b)Animal Products (Dairy Industry Fees, Charges, and Levies) Regulations 2015 (LI 2015/95).
# Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Act 2015 (Version 22)/Section 9

9Biosecurity Act 1993
The following orders are confirmed:
(a)Biosecurity (Readiness and Response—Kiwifruit Levy) Order 2015 (LI 2015/12):
(b)Biosecurity (System Entry Levy) Amendment Order 2015 (LI 2015/91).
# Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Act 2015 (Version 22)/Section 3

3Purpose of this Act
(1)The purpose of this Act is to prevent the lapse of certain subordinate legislation that, by virtue of the Acts under which it is made, lapses at a stated time unless earlier confirmed or validated by an Act of Parliament.
(2)Lapse, in this section, means expiry or deemed revocation.
# Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Act 2015 (Version 22)/Section 4

4Validations to prevent expiry do not cure invalidity, etc
In the light of their purpose, the validations effected by sections 13, 15, and 16 do not—
(a)express an intention to give legislative force to the provisions of the enactments validated; or
(b)apply to any reason for invalidating the enactments; or
(c)override any presumption that would otherwise apply to the enactments.
# Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Act 2015 (Version 22)/Section 17

17Wine Act 2003
The Wine Amendment Regulations 2015 (LI 2015/97) are confirmed.
# Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Act 2015 (Version 22)/Section 5

5Act binds the Crown
This Act binds the Crown.
# Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Act 2015 (Version 22)/Section 7

7Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Act 1997
The Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines (Fees, Charges, and Levies) Regulations 2015 (LI 2015/93) are confirmed.
# Sun Shipbuilding Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
271 U.S. 96
Sun Shipbuilding Company v. United States
Argued: April 15, 16, 1926. --- Decided: April 19, 1926
In No. 237:
Mr. Frank E. Scott, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Mr. Benjamin Carter, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
In No. 241: Mr. John E. Hughes, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Mr. Asst. Atty. Gen. Galloway, for the United States.
In No. 240:
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sun of Unclouded Righteousness

For the Mahometans
Sun of unclouded righteousness, With healing in thy wings arise A sad, benighted world to bless, Which now in sin and error lies, Wrapped in Egyptian night profound, With chains of hellish darkness bound.
The smoke of the infernal cave, Which half the Christian world o'erspread, Disperse, thou heavenly Light, and save The souls by that impostor led, That Arab-thief, as Satan bold, Who quite destroyed thy Asian fold.
O might the blood of sprinkling cry For those who spurn the sprinkled blood! Assert thy glorious Deity, Stretch out thy arm, thou triune God, the Unitarian fiend expel, And chase his doctrine back to hell!
Come, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, Thou Three in One, and One in Three, Resume thy own for ages lost, Finish the dire apostasy; Thine universal claim maintain, And Lord of the creation reign!﻿
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Speeches of Maximilien Robespierre

Volume 1 of the Voices of Revolt Series
(Upload an image to replace this placeholder.)
page
VOICES OF REVOLT
SPEECHES OF MAXIMILIEN ROBESPIERRE
page
VOICES OF REVOLT
VOLUME I
SPEECHES OF
MAXIMILIEN ROBESPIERRE
WITH A BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
NEW YORK
INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHERS
page
Copyright, 1927, by INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHERS, Inc.
Printed in the U. S. A.
This book is composed and printed by union labor
page
CONTENTS
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Standard Pipe Line Company v. Miller County Highway and Bridge District

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
277 U.S. 160
Standard Pipe Line Company v. Miller County Highway and Bridge District
Argued: April 20, 1928. --- Decided: May 14, 1928
Mr. Wm. H. Arnold, of Texarkana, Ark., for petitioner.
Mr. Henry Moore, Jr., of Texarkana, Ark., for respondent.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS announced the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Standard Parts Company v. Peck

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
264 U.S. 52
Standard Parts Company v. Peck
Argued: Jan. 15, 1924. --- Decided: Feb 18, 1924
Messrs. Bert M. Kent, A. V. Cannon, and John M. Garfield, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner.
Mr. Geo. L. Wilkinson, of Chicago, Ill., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 52-54 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McKENNA delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
226 U.S. 20
Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Company v. United States
Argued: October 15, 16, and 17, 1912. --- Decided: November 18, 1912
Messrs. Herbert Noble, Henry D. Estabrook, Hartwell P. Heath, for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 21-28 intentionally omitted]
Robert B. Honeyman, A. Parker Smith for appellants.
Attorney General Wickersham, and Mr. Edwin P. Grosvenor, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 28-34 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Standard Paint Company v. Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
220 U.S. 446
Standard Paint Company v. Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Company
Argued: and submitted March 16, 1911. --- Decided: April 10, 1911
Messrs. John F. Green and Frederick N. Judson for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 446-449 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. W. B. Homer and R. M. Homer for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 449-451 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Standard Pipe Line Company v. Commissioners of Index Sulphur Drainage District

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
278 U.S. 558
Standard Pipe Line Company v. Commissioners of Index Sulphur Drainage District
Messrs. T. M. Milling, of Shreveport, La., and William H. Arnold, William H. Arnold, Jr., and David C. Arnold, all of Texarkana, Ark., for petitioner.
Mr. Henry Moore, Jr., of Texarkana, Ark., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Standard Pipe Line Company v. Commissioners of Index Sulphur Drainage District/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
278 U.S. 558
Standard Pipe Line Company v. Commissioners of Index Sulphur Drainage District
The writ of certiorari (48 S.C.t. 420) is dismissed for the reason that the decree of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based on a non-Federal ground adequate to support it. Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U.S. 255, 257, 38 S.C.t. 264, 62 L. Ed. 701; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U.S. 268, 271, 39 S.C.t. 111, 63 L. Ed. 233.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tales of instruction: in verse and prose/The Wisdom of Providence

The WISDOM OF PROVIDENCE:
An Apologue.
Ceaſe then, nor Order Imperfection name: Our proper Bliſs depends on what we blame.
DURING the violence of a ſtorm, a traveller implored relief from Jupiter, and intreated him to aſſuage the tempeſt. But Jupiter lent a deaf ear to his intreaty. Struggling with the unabating fury of the whirlwind, tired, and far from ſhelter, he grew peeviſh and diſcontented. "Is it thus (he ſaid) the gods, to whom our ſacrifices are offered daily, heedleſs of our welfare, & amuſed with our ſufferings, make an oſtentatious parade of their omnipotence?" At length, approaching the verge of a foreſt, "here (he cried) I ſhall find that ſuccour ​and protection which Heaven, either ⟨unable⟩ or unwilling to aid me, hath refuſed." But as he advanced, a robber roſe ſuddenly from a brake, and our traveller, impelled by inſtant terror, and the proſpect of great danger, betook himſelf to flight, expoſing himſelf to the tempeſt of which he had ſo bitterly complained. His enemy, mean while fitting an arrow to his bow, took exact aim, but, the bow-ſtring being relaxed with the moiſture, the deadly weapon fell ſhort of its mark, and the traveller eſcaped uninjured. As he continued his journey, a voice iſſued awful from the clouds: "Meditate on the providence as well as on the power of Heaven: the ſtorm which you deprecated ſo blaſphemouſly hath been the means of your preſervation. Had not the bowſtring of your enemy been rendered uſeleſs by the rain, you had fallen a prey to his violence."
FINIS.
Printed by G Miller, Dunbar.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tales of mean streets

* information about this edition.
* related portals: Mystery.
"The greater number of these stories and studies were first printed in The National Observer; the introduction, in a slightly different form, in Macmillan's Magazine; "That Brute Simmons" and "A Conversion" have been published in The Pall Mall Budget; and "The Red Cow Group" is new."
CONTENTS
* Introduction
* Lizerunt
** I. Lizer's Wooing
** II. Lizer's First
** III. A Change of Circumstances
* Without Visible Means
* To Bow Bridge
* That Brute Simmons
* Behind the Shade
* Three Rounds
* In Business
* The Red Cow Group
* On the Stairs
* Squire Napper
* "A Poor Stick"
* A Conversion
* "All that Messuage"
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1945, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 78 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# The Abbotsford

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
98 U.S. 440
The Abbotsford
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Morton P. Henry for the 'Abbotsford.'
Mr. Henry Flanders and Mr. James B. Roney, contra.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Stockard v. Morgan

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
185 U.S. 27
Stockard v. Morgan
Argued: March 19, 1902. --- Decided: April 7, 1902
This is a writ of error to the supreme court of the state of Tennessee, brought to review a judgment of that court reversing a judgment of the court of chancery of Hamilton county in favor of complainants, and dismissing their bill.
The complainants sought to enjoin the collection of a tax imposed upon them under a statute of Tennessee, upon the ground that they were not liable for the tax because they were agents and brokers exclusively for the sale of the property of nonresident principals, and did no business of any kind for residents of the state. They also averred that the state statute, properly construed, did not include their business, but if it did, it was void as contravening the Federal Constitution in its interstate commerce clause.
The defendants by answer averred that they sought to collect the tax under the authority of the statute of the state of Tennessee, providing for the collection of a privilege tax on the occupation of the complainants as merchandise brokers, and that such statute was valid.
Other parties similarly situated commenced suits against the defendants to obtain like relief. By an agreement, which was approved by the court, all the cases were consolidated under the style of Stockard & Jones v. Morgan and others, under which title it was agreed that they should thereafter proceed as one case.
The case came to trial in the chancery court upon the following agreed statement of facts:
'In this consolidated cause the following agreement is made as to the facts relating to the matters in controversy, viz.:
'It is agreed that the several complainants in the original bills, to wit, J. H. McReynolds, Stockard & Jones, W. G. Oehmig, T. M. Carothers, and J. H. Allison are residents of Hamilton county, Tennessee.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Talmud (Rodkinson)/Book 1

See also: Explanatory Remarks

## Volume 1

* Dedication
* Preface to the Second Edition
* Editor's Preface
* Brief General Introduction to the Babylonian Talmud
* Introduction to Tract Sabbath
* Synopsis of Subjects
* Chapter I: Regulations Regarding Transfer on Sabbath
* Chapter II: Regulations Concerning The Sabbath And 'Hanukah Light
* Chapter III: Regulations Concerning Stoves, Hearths, and Ovens
* Chapter IV: Regulations Concerning Victuals, Where They May or May Not Be Deposited to Retain Their Heat for the Sabbath
* Chapter V: Regulations Concerning What May and May Not Be Worn by Animals on the Sabbath
* Chapter VI: Regulations Concerning What Garments Women May Go Out With On the Sabbath
* Chapter VII: The General Rule Concerning the Principal Acts of Labor on Sabbath
* Chapter VIII: Regulations Concerning the Prescribed Quantities of Victuals and Beverages Which Must Not Be Carried About on the Sabbath
* Chapter IX: Rabbi Aqiba's Regulations On Different Subjects
* Chapter X: Further Regulations Concerning The Prescribed Quantity of Things To Be Stored

## Volume 2

* Synopsis of Subjects of Volume II
* Chapter XI. Regulations Concerning Throwing From One Ground Into Another
* Chapter XII: Regulations Concerning Building, Ploughing, etc., On the Sabbath
* Chapter XIII: Regulations Concerning Weaving, Tearing, Hunting, etc., on the Sabbath
* Chapter XIV: Regulations Concerning the Catching of Reptiles, Animals and Birds
* Chapter XV: Regulations Concerning the Tying and Untying of Knots on the Sabbath
* Chapter XVI: Regulations Concerning Articles Which May be Saved From a Conflagration on Sabbath
* Chapter XVII: Regulations Concerning Handling of Utensils and Furniture on the Sabbath
* Chapter XVIII: Regulations Regarding the Clearing Off of Required Space, the Assistance To Be Given Cattle When Giving Birth To Their Young and To Women About To Be Confined
* Chapter XIX: Regulations Ordained by R. Eliezer Concerning Circumcision on the Sabbath
* Chapter XX: Regulations Concerning Certain Acts of Labor Which Must be Performed Differently on a Sabbath and on a Festival
* Chapter XXI: Regulations Concerning the Pouring Out of Wine From Vessels Covered With a Stone (Which Must Not Be Lifted), and the Clearing Off of Crumbs, etc., From the Table
* Chapter XXII: Regulations Concerning Preparation of Food and Beverages
* Chapter XXIII: Borrowing, Casting Lots, Waiting for the Close of the Sabbath, and Attending to a Corpse
* Chapter XXVI: Regulations Concerning a Man Who is Overtaken by Dusk on the Eve of Sabbath While Travelling, and Concerning Feeding of Cattle
* The Prayer at the Conclusion of a Tract
* Appendix