OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Aunt Caroline's Dixieland Recipes/Breads/Baltimore Egg Bread

BALTIMORE EGG BREAD
Two eggs, Three cups of meal, Four cups of sour milk, One tablespoonful of lard, One teaspoonsful of salt, One-fourth teaspoonful of soda, One and one-half teaspoonfuls of baking powder.
Beat eggs well together, add milk, meal, salt, soda and baking powder and lastly the hot melted lard. Bake in moderate oven. One cup of fresh corn cooked until tender may be added to the batter.
# Aunt Caroline's Dixieland Recipes/Breads/Carolina Brown Bread

CAROLINA BROWN BREAD (Baked)
1 cupful of Indian Meal, 1 cupful of Rye meal, ½ cupful of flour, 1 cupful of molasses (scant), 1 cupful of milk or water, 1 teaspoonsful of soda.
Put the meals and flour together. Stir soda into molasses until it foams. Add salt and milk or water. Mix all together. Bake in a tin pail with cover on for two and a half hours.
# Behind A Mask or, A Woman's Power

* Chapter 1
* Chapter 2
* Chapter 3
* Chapter 4
* Chapter 5
* Chapter 6
* Chapter 7
* Chapter 8
* Chapter 9
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Arnson v. Murphy (115 U.S. 579)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
115 U.S. 579
Arnson v. Murphy
Argued: December 7, 1885. ---
Lewis Sanders and Geo. N. Sanders, for plaintiffs in error.
Sol. Gen Goode, for defendant in error.
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Aro Manufacturing Company v. Convertible Top Replacement Company

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Aro Manufacturing Company v. Convertible Top Replacement Company."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Aro Manufacturing Company v. Convertible Top Replacement Company (365 U.S. 336)
* Aro Manufacturing Company v. Convertible Top Replacement Company (377 U.S. 476)
# Aro Manufacturing Company v. Convertible Top Replacement Company (377 U.S. 476)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, quotes, Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    White

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
377 U.S. 476
Aro Manufacturing Company v. Convertible Top Replacement Company
Argued: Feb. 17, 1964. --- Decided: June 8, 1964
[Syllabus from pages 477-478 intentionally omitted]
Charles Hieken, Boston, Mass., for petitioners.
Elliott I. Pollock, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Aro Manufacturing Company v. Convertible Top Replacement Company (365 U.S. 336)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinions

    Black
    Brennan
United States Supreme Court
365 U.S. 336
Aro Manufacturing Company v. Convertible Top Replacement Company
Argued: Oct. 13 and 17, 1960. --- Decided: Feb 27, 1961
See 365 U.S. 890, 81 S.Ct. 1024.
Mr. David Wolf, Boston, Mass., for petitioners.
Mr. Ralph S. Spritzer, Washington, D.C., for United States, as amicus curiae.
Mr. Elliott I. Pollock, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice WHITTAKER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Aro Manufacturing Company v. Convertible Top Replacement Company (377 U.S. 476)/Concurrence White

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion White
* Dissenting Opinion Black
United States Supreme Court
377 U.S. 476
Aro Manufacturing Company v. Convertible Top Replacement Company
Argued: Feb. 17, 1964. --- Decided: June 8, 1964
Mr. Justice WHITE, concurring.
I agree with my Brother BLACK that the plain language and legislative history of § 271(c) require the alleged contributory infringer to have knowledge of the infringing nature of the combination to which he is contributing a part. Otherwise I share MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN'S view of this case.
Section 271(a) imposes no comparable requirement of knowledge in the case of the direct infringer who makes or uses the patented com ination and § 287 does not say that one who makes or uses without knowledge is not infringing. It specifies that the 'infringer' is not liable for damages until notice of the 'infringement.' In any event, § 287, as my Brother BRENNAN says, is not applicable here under Wine Ry. Appliance Co. v. Enterprise Ry. Equipment Co., 297 U.S. 387, 56 S.Ct. 528, because the patentee has not manufactured the article and has had no opportunity to mark it in accordance with § 287.
Here the patentee gave notice to Aro and I think it is liable on Ford tops sold by it after that date, but not before, unless it had knowledge from other sources. After the notice date, the knowledge requirement of § 271(c) was satisfied and the use of Ford cars by the owners thereof was direct infringement providing the necessary predicate for contributory infringement under § 271(c).
Mr. Justice BLACK, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Mr. Justice DOUGLAS and Mr. Justice CLARK, join, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
292 U.S. 80
Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company
Argued: March 8, 1934. --- Decided: April 2, 1934
Messrs. Randell Larson and Allen G. Wright, both of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
Mr. George A. Work, of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ashby v. Hall

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
119 U.S. 526
Ashby v. Hall
Eppa Hunton and Jeff. Chandler, for appellant, Ashby.
No appearance for appellees.
FIELD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ashbacker Radio Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
326 U.S. 327
Ashbacker Radio Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission
Argued: Nov. 13, 1945. --- Decided: Dec 3, 1945
Mr. Paul M. Segal, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Ralph F. Fuchs, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ash Sheep Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
252 U.S. 159
Ash Sheep Company v. United States
Argued: Jan. 30, 1920. --- Decided: March 1, 1920
Messrs. Cornelius B. Nolan and William Scallon, both of Helena, Mont., for appellant and plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 159-162 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Nebeker, for the United States.
Mr. Justice CLARKE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bock v. Perkins

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
139 U.S. 628
Bock v. Perkins
H. B. Fouke and D. E. Lyon, for plaintiff in error.
D. B. Henderson, F. B. Daniels, and Louis G. Hurd, for defendants in error.
HARLAN, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Boddie v. Connecticut

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinions

    Douglas
    Brennan

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
401 U.S. 371
Boddie et al. v. Connecticut et al.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
No. 27. Argued: December 8, 1969, and November 17, 1970 --- Decided: March 2, 1971
In view of the basic position of the marriage relationship in our society and the state monopolization of the means for dissolving that relationship, due process of law prohibits a State from denying, solely because of inability to pay court fees and costs, access to its courts to indigents who, in good faith, seek judicial dissolution of their marriage. Pp. 374-383.
286 F. Supp. 968, reversed.
HARLAN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and STEWART, WHITE, MARSHALL, and BLACKMUN, JJ., joined. DOUGLAS, J., filed an opinion concurring in the result, post, p. 383. BRENNAN, J., filed an opinion concurring in part, post, p. 386. BLACK, J., filed a dissenting opinion, post, p. 389.
Arthur B. LaFrance reargued the cause and filed briefs for appellants.
Raymond J. Cannon, Assistant Attorney General of Connecticut, reargued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief were Robert K. Killian, Attorney General, and William S. Kaplan.
Allan Ashman filed a brief for the National Legal Aid and Defender Association as amicus curiae urging reversal.
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by Francis B. Burch, Attorney General of Maryland, and J. Michael McWilliams, Assistant Attorney General, joined by George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, and by Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, and by the following Attorneys General: David P. Buckson of Delaware, Jack P.F. Gremillion of Louisiana, Clarence A.H. Meyer of Nebraska, Harvey Dickerson of Nevada, Helgi Johanneson of North Dakota, and Lee Johnson of Oregon.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baa Baa Black Sheep

* related portals: Nursery rhymes.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, quotes, Wikidata item.
This rhyme was first printed in Tommy Thumb's Pretty Song Book, the oldest surviving collection of English language nursery rhymes, published c. 1744 with the lyrics very similar to those still used today.
* "Bah, Bah, a black Sheep" in Tommy Thumb's Pretty Song Book by Nurse Lovechild (1744)
* "Baa baa, black sheep" in Gammer Gurton's garland of nursery songs and Toby Tickle's collection of riddles by Peter Puzzlecap and Thomas Bewick (1820)
* "Baa, baa, black sheep" in Nursery Rhymes (1860)
* "B" in The Alphabet of Old Friends by Walter Crane (1874)
* Baa Baa Black Sheep, illustrated by Edmund Caldwell (1880)
* "Ba-a ba-a, Black Sheep" in Nursery Rhymes (c. 1885)
* "Bah! bah! Black Sheep" in A Book of Nursery Songs and Rhymes by Sabine Baring-Gould (1895)
* "Baa! Baa! Black Sheep" in The Baby's Opera by Edmund Evans and Walter Crane (1900)
* "Baa, baa, black sheep" in The Nursery Rhymes of Mother Goose by Arthur Rackham (St. Nicholas, 1913)
* "Baa, Baa, Black Sheep" in The Real Mother Goose by Blanche Fisher Wright (1916)
* "Baa! Baa! Black Sheep" in The Child's Own Music Book by Albert Ernest Wier (1918)
# Babbitt

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
Babbitt, first published in 1922, is a novel by the American novelist, short-story writer, and playwright Sinclair Lewis. It is a satire about American values, and its main theme is the power of conformity and the vacuity of American life. The controversy provoked by Babbitt was influential in the decision to award the Nobel Prize in Literature to Lewis in 1930. The word "Babbitt" entered the English language as a "person and especially a business or professional man who conforms unthinkingly to prevailing middle-class standards".
BABBITT
Sinclair Lewis
BABBITT
BY
SINCLAIR LEWIS
AUTHOR OF
MAIN STREET, Etc.
GROSSET & DUNLAP
PUBLISHERS NEW YORK
Made in the United States of America
COPYRIGHT, 1922, BY
HARCOURT, BRACE AND COMPANY, INC.
PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OT AMERICA
To Edith Wharton
* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
* Chapter VII
* Chapter VIII
* Chapter IX
* Chapter X
* Chapter XI
* Chapter XII
* Chapter XIII
* Chapter XIV
* Chapter XV
* Chapter XVI
* Chapter XVII
* Chapter XVIII
* Chapter XIX
* Chapter XX
* Chapter XXI
* Chapter XXII
* Chapter XXIII
* Chapter XXIV
* Chapter XXV
* Chapter XXVI
* Chapter XXVII
* Chapter XXVIII
* Chapter XXIX
* Chapter XXX
* Chapter XXXI
* Chapter XXXII
* Chapter XXXIII
* Chapter XXXIV
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1951, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 72 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baa Baa Black sheep (Caldwell)

* related portals: Children's poetry, Nursery rhymes.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
BAA, BAA! BLACK SHEEP,
HAVE YOU ANY WOOL?
AYE, SIR;
NAY, SIR;
THREE BAGS FULL.
ONE FOR THE MASTER,
ONE FOR THE DAME,
BUT NONE FOR THE LITTLE BOY
WHO CRIES IN THE LANE.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1930, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 93 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# BT Inv. Managers, Inc. v. Lewis

* related portals: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
* 559 F.2d 950
* BT INVESTMENT MANAGERS, INC. and Bankers Trust New York Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants
* v.
* Gerald A. LEWIS, Comptroller of the State of Florida and Commissioner of Banking of the State of Florida, Defendant-Appellee
* No. 76-1373
* United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
* September 21, 1977
John E. Mathews, Jr., Jacksonville, Florida, Stephen E. Day, Jacksonville, Florida, for Appellant.
Hon. Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Florida, William B. Corbett, Jr., Asst. Gen. Counsel, Office of Comptroller, Tallahassee, Florida, Larry Levy, Gen. Counsel, Office of Comptroller, Tallahassee, Florida, Ed Kuhnel, Gen. Cnsl., Comptroller's Office, Tallahassee, Florida, Richard E. Gentry, Asst. Gen Csl., Comptroller's Office, Tallahassee, Florida, for Appellee.
Ainsworth and Morgan, Circuit Judges, and Lynne, Senior District Judge.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Senior District Judge of the Northern District of Alabama, Sitting by designation.
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book VII/Hymn 88 (93)

88 (93). Against poison.
[Garutman.—takṣakadevatyam. 3-av. bṛhatī.]
⌊Prose.⌋ Found in Pāipp. xx., but so defaced as not to be comparable in detail. Used by Kāuç. (29. 6) in a healing rite against snake-poison, rubbing the bite with grass and flinging this out in the direction of the snake.
Translated: Ludwig, p. 511; Henry, 36, 106; Griffith, i. 373.
1. Go away! enemy (ári) art thou; enemy verily art thou; in poison hast thou mixed poison; poison verily hast thou mixed; go away straight to the snake; smite that!
It can be seen in Ppp. that the combination arir vā ’si is made. Addressed to the poison (comm.), or to the wisp of grass that wipes it off (Henry)—or otherwise. The "verse" (12: 14: 10 = 36) is bṛhatī only in number of syllables. ⌊The comm. reads abhyupehi. He takes the "that" to mean the snake. With regard to the auto-toxic action of snake-venoms, see note to v. 13. 4.⌋
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book VII/Hymn 85 (90)

85 (90). Invocation of Tārkshya.
[Atharvan (svastyayanakāmaḥ).—tārkṣyadevatyam. trāiṣṭubham.]
Not found in Pāipp. Used in Kāuç. (59. 14), with 86 and 117, in a rite for general welfare, and by the schol. (note to 137. 4) in making a sacrificial hearth for the ājyatantra; it is also reckoned (note to 25. 36) to the svastyayana gaṇa.
Translated: Henry, 36, 105; Griffith, i. 372.—See also Foy, KZ. xxxiv. 268.
1. We would fain call hither for [our] welfare Tārkshya, this vigorous, god-quickened, powerful overcomer of chariots, ⌊Tārkshya,⌋ having uninjured tires, fight-conquering, swift.
The verse is RV. x. 178. 1 and SV. i. 332. For our sáhovānam, in b, RV. reads sahā́vānam and SV. sahovā́nam; both have pṛtanā́jam (undivided in RV. pada-text) in c instead of -ājím (p. -ā॰jím) and, in d, the RV. pada-text understands ihā́ as simply ihá, ours as ihá: ā́. The comm. also reads pṛtanājam, but explains it as containing either the root aj or ji.
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book VII/Hymn 87 (92)

87 (92). Homage to Rudra.
[Atharvan.—rāudram. jāgatam.]
Found also in Pāipp. xx. Found in Kāuç. (59. 29) in a rite for welfare, with worship of the Rudras; and reckoned (note to 50. 13) to the rāudra gaṇa. Used repeatedly by Vāit.: in the parvan sacrifice (4. 10), when the cleansing tuft is thrown in the fire, and again, in the cāturmāsya sacrifice (9. 18), with a cake to Tryambaka; also (24. 17) at the end of the agniṣṭoma, when the priests quit the place of sacrifice.
Translated: Muir, iv$^2$. 333; Henry, 36, 106; Griffith, i. 372.
1. The Rudra that is in the fire (agní), that is within the waters, that entered the herbs, the plants, that shaped (kḷp) all these beings—to that Rudra, to Agni, be homage.
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book VII/Hymn 84 (89)

84 (89). To Agni: and to Indra.
[Bhṛgu.—tṛcam. āindra,: 1. āgneyī. trāiṣṭubham: 1. jagatī.]
Only the first verse is found in Pāipp., in iii. For the use by Kāuç. and Vāit. (not of vs. 1), see under vss. 2, 3.
Translated: Henry, 35, 105; Griffith, i. 371.
1. O Agni, shine thou here unassailable, Jātavedas, immortal, wide-ruling (virā́j), bearing dominion; releasing all diseases by humane, propitious [aids], do thou protect round about today our household.
The comm. supplies ūtibhis in c, d, and the translation given follows his lead. The verse is found also as VS. xxvii. 7, and in TS. iv. i. 7$^3$ and MS. ii. 12. 5; MS. makes c easy by reading mā́nuṣāṇām (it also has ví for víçvās), and VS.TS. by reading mā́nuṣīr bhiyáḥ. MS.VS. give after this çivébhis; and VS.TS. have ā́çās for ámīvās in c. All read ániṣṭṛtas (Ppp. aniṣṭatas) for ámartyas in a, and vṛdhé for gáyam at the end (Ppp. gayāiḥ). Ppp. has, in c, d, manuṣyebhyaḥ çivebhir. All the texts thus relieve in various ways the difficulties and awkwardnesses of the second half-verse.
We should expect here a separation of the hymn into two, as the remaining verses are addressed to Indra; but no ms. or other authority so divides.
2. O Indra, unto dominion, [unto] pleasant force, wast thou born, thou bull of men (carṣaṇí); thou didst push away the inimical people; thou didst make wide room for the gods.
This verse and the next are two verses, connected (but in inverted order), in RV. (x. 180. 3, 2), found also in TS. i. 6. 12$^4$. Both these read in c amitrayántam, their only variant in this verse. In d carṣaṇīnā́m is most naturally made dependent on vṛṣabha, although, as such, it ought to be without accent; Henry takes it as governed by the nouns in a. The verse (doubtless with vs. 3) is used by Kāuç. (17. 31) in the consecration of a king ⌊Weber, Rājasūya, p. 142⌋, and (140. 17) in the indramahotsava, with libation to Indra, and service of Brahmans. ⌊RV.TS. accent carṣaṇinā́m and all of W's and SPP's mss. seem to do so. Perhaps, in spite of W's version, we have no right to correct our text by deleting the accent; but the accent can hardly be aught else than an old blunder.⌋
3. Like a fearful wild beast, wandering, mountain-staying, from distant distance may he come hither; sharpening, O Indra, [thy] missile (? sṛká), [thy] keen rim, smite away the foes, push away the scorners.
The first half-verse was read above as 26. 2 b, c. The verse is RV. x. 180. 2, TS. i. 6. 12$^4$ (as noted under the preceding verse), and also SV. ii. 1223, MS. iv. 12. 3, VS. xviii. 71; their only variant is at jagamyāt in b, for which TS. has jagāmā, and all the rest jaganthā. The comm. takes sṛka as an adj., = saraṇaçīla. ⌊Cf. Knauer's Index to MGS., p. 153.⌋ ⌊For use by Kāuç., see under vs. 2.⌋ Vāit. (29. 5) uses the verse in the agnicayana, in the covering of the first layers.
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book VII/Hymn 86 (91)

86 (91). Invocation of Indra.
[Atharvan (svastyayanakāmaḥ).—āindram, trāiṣṭubham.]
Wanting in Pāipp. Follows in its applications closely those of 85 (Kāuç. 59. 14, and notes to 137. 4 and 25. 36); but appears further (140. 6) in the indramahotsava, with hymn 91 and v. 3. 11, accompanying an offering of butter.
Translated: Henry, 36, 106; Griffith, i. 372.
1. The savior Indra, the helper Indra, the hero Indra, of easy call at every call—I call now on the mighty (çakrá), much-called Indra; let the bounteous (maghávan) Indra make well-being for us.
The verse is RV. vi. 47. 11, also SV. i. 333, VS. xx. 50, TS. i. 6. 12$^5$, MS. iv. 9. 27 et al. In a, TS. accents ávitāram; in c, RV.VS. begin hváyāmi (for huvé nú); for d, they all read svastí no (but SV. idáṁ havír) maghávā dhātv (SV. vetv) índraḥ. ⌊Cf. also MGS. i. 11. 16, and p. 150.⌋
# Book of Common Prayer (ECUSA)/Historical Documents of the Church

Historical Documents of the Church
Definition of the Union of the Divine and Human Natures in the Person of Christ 864 Quicunque Vult commonly called The Creed of Saint Athanasius 864 Preface from the First Book of Common Prayer (1549) 866 Articles of Religion 867 The Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral 1886, 1888 876