OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/28th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 64

Chap. LXIV.—An Act providing payment for certain military services in Florida.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Militia forces to be paid. That the Secretary of War cause to be paid the following militia forces of the Territory of Florida for the periods of their respective service as hereinafter specified, to wit:
Col. Brown’s.Colonel Robert Brown’s command, from the sixth April to the twenty-second July, eighteen hundred and thirty-eight, except the company of Captain North, which shall only be paid to the twelfth July, eighteen hundred and thirty-eight.
Maj. Garrison’s.Major Isaac Garrison’s command, from the nineteenth March to fifth July, eighteen hundred and thirty-eight.
Capt. Robert’s.Captain Arthur Robert’s company, from September thirteenth, eighteen hundred and thirty-eight, to January thirteenth, eighteen hundred and thirty-nine.
Capt. Thigpen’s.Captail J. L. Thigpen’s company, from first March to thirty-first August, eighteen hundred and thirty-eight.
Capt. Williams’.Captain William William’s company, from sixteenth August, eighteen hundred and thirty-eight, to February sixteenth, eighteen hundred and thirty-nine.
Captains Cone and Bryan’s.Captains William Cone and John Bryan’s companies, from sixteenth August to fifteenth September, eighteen hundred and forty.
Capt. Stewart’s.Captain J. L. Stewart’s company, from nineteenth August to thirtieth September, eighteen hundred and forty.
Capt. Daniel’s.Captain Stephen Daniel’s company, from October thirteenth to November twenty-sixth, eighteen hundred and forty-two.
Supplies to be paid for.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the Secretary of War also cause payment to be made for such supplies as were actually purchased for the use of any of said troops, and that to the extent to which they furnished themselves equitable allowance to be made therefor.
Muster rolls to be sworn to, &c.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That the muster rolls according to which the above payments shall be made, shall be sworn to by the captain of each company, or senior living officer present in Florida, and approved by the Governor of Florida.
Appropriation.Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That all balances remaining unexpended out of appropriations heretofore made for payment of Florida volunteers or militia, or for supplies furnished to militia serving in Florida, be and the same are hereby made applicable to the payment of the militia and supplies provided for in this act, so far as the same may be necessary; and if such balances be insufficient, the remainder of the amount required is hereby appropriated out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, March 3, 1845.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/28th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 47

Chap. XLVII.—An Act making appropriations for the support of the Military Academy for the year ending the thirtieth June, eighteen hundred and forty-six.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Appropriations. That the following sums be, and the same are hereby appropriated out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the support of the Military Academy, for the year ending on the thirtieth of June, eighteen hundred and forty-six:
Pay.For the pay of officers, instructors, cadets, and musicians, seventy-nine thousand four hundred and sixty dollars;
Subsistence.For commutation of subsistence, three thousand five hundred and seventy-seven dollars;
Forage of officers’ horses.For commutation of forage for officers’ horses, two thousand five hundred and ninety-two dollars;
Clothing of officers’ servants.For clothing for their servants, four hundred and twenty dollars;
Incidental and contingent expenses.For repairs and improvements, fuel and apparatus, forage of public horses and oxen, stationery, printing and other incidental and contingent expenses, twenty-two thousand dollars;
Barracks.For the building of barracks for cadets, thirty thousand dollars: Provided, That this appropriation, and the unexpended balance of the one heretofore made for this object, shall be applied exclusively to the completion of that portion of the barracks which is designed to accommodate the cadets usually quartered in the “old south barracks.”
Pay of a cadet.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That from and after the thirtieth June, eighteen hundred and forty-five, the pay of a cadet shall be twenty-four dollars per month, in lieu of the present pay and emoluments.
Approved, March 3, 1845.
# United States v. Ashfleld

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
91 U.S. 317
United States v. Ashfleld
APPEAL from the Court of Claims.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Assistant Attorney-General Edwin B. Smith and Mr. John S. Blair for the United States, and Mr. J. M. Carlisle and Mr. J. D. McPherson for the appellee.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Arzner

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
287 U.S. 470
United States v. Arzner
Argued: Dec. 13, 1932. --- Decided: Jan 9, 1933
Messrs. William D. Mitchell, Atty. Gen., and Paul D. Miller, of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
Mr. Samuel H. Williams, of Lynchburg, Va., for respondent.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
384 U.S. 888
United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.
Former decision, 86 S.Ct. 1269.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Jerry Z. Pruzansky, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur J. Cerra, for the United States and others.
Douglas F. Smith, Howard J. Trienens, George L. Saunders, Jr., John E. McCullough, S. R. Brittingham, Jr., Charles W. Burkett, Monroe E. Clinton, Frank S. Farrell, Alan C. Furth, Lawrence W. Hobbs, Thormund A. Miller, Robert L. Pierce, E. P. Porter, L. E. Torinus, Jr., and E. L. Van Dellen, for appellees, Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. and others.
June 20, 1966.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Atchison T. & S. F. Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
249 U.S. 451
United States v. Atchison T. & S. F. Railway Company
Argued: March 11 and 12, 1919. --- Decided: April 14, 1919
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Brown, for the United States.
Mr. Alexander Britton, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Memorandum opinion by Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Atchison T. & S. F. Railway Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
249 U.S. 451
United States v. Atchison T. & S. F. Railway Company
Argued: March 11 and 12, 1919. --- Decided: April 14, 1919
During 1910 and 1911 the appellee railway company entered into customary arrangements with the Post Office Department to carry mail over a number of routes for quadrennial terms ending June 30, 1914, and 1915, com pensation to be based upon ascertained weights. While these were in force, by Act or August 24, 1912, c. 389 (37 Stat. 557), Congress directed establishment of the parcel post service without providing for any additional compensation on account of the large increase in weights which would surely follow.
The Postmaster General called attention to the matter January 20, 1913; and after much consideration the following clause was incorporated in the Act of March 4, 1913, c. 143 (37 Stat. 791, 797 [Comp. St. § 7494]):
'That on account of the increased weight of mails resulting from the enactment of section eight of the act of August twenty-fourth, nineteen hundred and twelve, * * * the Postmaster General is authorized to add to the compensation paid for transportation on railroad routes on and after July first, nineteen hundred and thirteen, for the remainder of the contract terms, not exceeding five per centum thereof per annum, excepting upon routes weighed since January first, nineteen hundred and thirteen, and to be readjusted from July first, nineteen hundred and thirteen, until otherwise provided by law.'
Acting under this provision, the Postmaster General refused to allow increased compensation of 5 per centum upon all routes, but apportioned payments among them-never in excess of 5 per centum-according to a carefully worked out formula which he deemed appropriate. Appellee sued for the difference between amount actually received and what it would have received if five per centum had been added. Considering history of the legislation and intent of Congress supposed to be indicated thereby the Court of Claims held that the act--
'required the Postmaster General to add 5 per cent. to the compensation being paid on all of said routes, and he having failed to do so that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the difference sued for.' Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. United States, 52 Ct. Cl. 338, 361.
We are unable to agree with this conclusion. The language of the enactment is clear and we think it vested in the Postmaster general a discretion which, so far as shown General a discretion which, so far as shown not unmindful of the burden imposed upon appellee nor of the circumstances which lend color to a different conclusion; but these are not sufficient to justify a disregard of the plain import of the words which Congress deliberately adopted.
The judgment below must be reversed and the cause remanded with direction to dismiss the petition.
Reversed and remanded.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
220 U.S. 37
United States v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Company
Argued: February 28, 1911. --- Decided: March 13, 1911
Assistant to the Attorney General Kenyon, Attorney General Wickersham, and Special Assistant United States Attorney Doherty for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 37-40 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Robert Dunlap and Gardiner Lathrop for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 40-42 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
384 U.S. 888
United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company
Upon consideration of the memorandum of certain appellees and an examination of the entire record, so much of the judgment of the District Court as respects the portions of the orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission dated March 21, 1963, and December 31, 1963, as were vacated by orders of the Commission of January 7, 1966, and March 17, 1966, and two orders of April 13, 1966, is vacated and to that extent the cause is remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss such portions of the judgment as moot.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Dunn

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Dunn."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Dunn (120 U.S. 249)
* United States v. Dunn (268 U.S. 121)
See also Dunn v. United States.
# United States v. Dunn (120 U.S. 249)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
120 U.S. 249
United States v. Dunn
Atty. Gen. Garland and F. P. Dewees, for appellant.
John Paul Jones, and Robt. B. Lines, for appellee.
MILLER, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Dunn (268 U.S. 121)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
268 U.S. 121
United States v. Dunn (268 U.S. 121)
Argued: March 13, 1925. --- Decided: April 13, 1925
Messrs. W. A. Ledbetter, of Oklahoma City, Okl., and W. W. Dyar, of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
Mr. Geo. S. Ramsay, of Muskogee, Okl., for appellees Dunn and others.
Mr. Wm. G. Davisson, of Ardmore, Okl., for appellees Gillam.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 122-125 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 45/70th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 123

Chap. 123.—An Act To reserve one hundred and twenty acres on the public domain for the use and benefit of the Koosharem Band of Indians residing in the vicinity of Koosharem, Utah.
Public Lands. Designated lands in Utah reserved for Koosharem Indians.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That one hundred and twenty acres of land described as the west half southwest quarter and southwest quarter northeast quarter section 9, township 27 south, range 1 west, Salt Lake meridian, Utah, be, and the same is, hereby reserved for the sole use and occupancy of the Koosharem Band of Indians in Utah, provided that the rights and claims of any bona fide settler initiated under the public land laws prior to November 5, 1927, the date of withdrawal of the lands, from all form of entry, shall not be affected by this Act.
Approved, March 3, 1928.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 45/70th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 168

Chap. 168.—An Act To extend the times for commencing and completing the construction of a bridge across the Mississippi River at or near the city of Savanna, Illinois, and the city of Sabula, Iowa.
Mississippi RiverBe it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the times for Time extended for bridging, from Savanna, Ill., to Sabula, Iowa.commencing and completing the construction of a bridge across the Mississippi River at or near the city of Savanna, Illinois, and the city of Sabula, Iowa, authorized to be built by the States of IllinoisVol. 43, p. 173. and Iowa by the Act of Congress approved May 26, 1924, as revived Ante, p. 297. and reenacted by Act of Congress approved March 10, 1928, are ​hereby extended one and three years, respectively, from March 10, 1929.
Sec. 2. The right to alter, amend, or repeal this Act is hereby Amendment.expressly reserved.
Approved, February 9, 1929.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 45/70th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 480

Chap. 480.—An Act To authorize the President to present the distinguished flying cross to Colonel Francesco de Pinedo, Dieudonne Costes, Joseph LeBrix-Ehrenfried Gunther von Huenefeld, James C. FitzMaurice, and Hermann Koehl,
Distinguished flying crosses. To be presented to Colonel Francesco de Pinedo.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That the President be, and is hereby, authorized to present the distinguished flying cross to Colonel Francesco de Pinedo in recognition of his extraordinary achievement in making an aerial journey of twenty-five thousand miles by flying boat in the course of which he arrived in the United States by air from Rome.
Dieudonne Costes and Joseph LeBrix.That the President be, and is hereby, authorized to present the distinguished flying cross to Dieudonne Costes and Joseph LeBrix in recognition of their extraordinary achievement in an aerial journey of thirty-five thousand miles in the course of which they arrived in the United States by air after making the first nonstop flight across the South Atlantic.
Ehrenfried Gunther von Huenefeld, James C. FitzMaurice, and Hermann Koehl.That the President be and he is hereby authorized to present the distinguished flying cross to Ehrenfried Gunther von Huenefeld, James C . FitzMaurice, and Hermann Koehl, in recognition of their extraordinary achievement in making the first nonstop westward trans-Atlantic flight by airplane from Europe to North America.
Approved, May 2, 1928.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 45/70th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 166

Chap. 166.—An Act To authorize the Secretary of War to transfer the control of certain land in Oregon to the Secretary of the Interior.
Columbia River, Oreg.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary Lands connected with improvements of, transferred for Indian fishing camp site.of War be and he is hereby, authorized to transfer to the control of the Secretary of the Interior, for the use and benefit of certain Indians now using and occupying the land as a fishing camp site, two irregular shaped parcels of land containing in the aggregate approximately seven and four-tenths acres, located in lot 1 of section 17 and in lots 1 and 2 of section 20, township 2 north, range 15 east, Willamette meridian, Oregon, originally acquired by the United States as a right of way for a projected boat railway in connectionProviso with the improvements of The Dalles-Celilo section of the ColumbiaStrip reserved for roadway to the Columbia River Highway River: Provided, That a strip forty feet wide be reserved from such transfer for a roadway connection between the lock keeper's grounds at Celilo and the Columbia River Highway.
Approved, February 9, 1929.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 45/70th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 167

Chap. 167.—An Act To authorize the President to award, in the name of Congress, gold medals of appropriate design to John H . Towers, Albert C. Read, Elmer F. Stone, Walter Hinton, H. C. Rodd, J. L. Breese, and Eugene Rhodes.
Gold medals.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President Award by the President of, in the name of Congress, to personnel of the first trans-Atlantic flight. be, and is hereby, authorized to award, in the name of Congress, gold medals of appropriate design to Commander John H. Towers for conceiving, organizing, and commanding the first trans-Atlantic flight; to Lieutenant Commander Albert C. Read, United States Navy, commanding officer NC-4; to Lieutenant Elmer F. Stone, United States Coast Guard, pilot; to former Lieutenant Walter Hinton, United States Navy, pilot; to Lieutenant H. C. Rodd, United States Navy, radio operator; to former Lieutenant J. L. Breese, United States Naval Reserve Force, engineer; and to former Machinist's Mate Eugene Rhodes, United States Navy, engineer, for their extraordinary achievement in making the first successful trans-Atlantic flight, in the United States naval flying boat NC-4, in May, 1919.
Approved, February 9, 1929.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 46/71st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 318

Chap. 318.—Joint Resolution Authorizing the presentation of medals to the officers and men of the Byrd antarctic expedition.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Byrd Antarctic Expedition That the Secretary of the Navy be, and he is hereby,Medals to be presented by Secretary of the Navy, for presentation to officers and men of. empowered and directed to cause to be made at the United States mint such number of gold, silver, and bronze medals as he may deem appropriate and necessary respectively to be presented to the officers and men of the Byrd antarctic expedition to express the high admiration in which the Congress and the American peoplePost, p. 883. hold their heroic and undaunted services in connection with the scientific investigations and extraordinary aerial explorations of the Antarctic Continent, under the personal direction of Rear Admiral Richard E. Byrd, said medals to be suitably inscribed.
Sec. 2.Amount authorized for cost.That such amount as may be necessary for the cost of said medals is hereby authorized to be appropriated out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, May 23, 1930.