# Oklahoma v. Texas (256 U.S. 602)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
256 U.S. 602
Oklahoma v. Texas (256 U.S. 602)
Mr. S. P. Freeling, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for the State of Oklahoma.
Messrs. C. W. Taylor, of Austin, Tex., and Oriville Bullington and A. H. Carrigan, both of Wichita Falls, Tex., for the State of Texas.
The following orders were made by the court:
Application of Pearson et al.
Upon application of A. E. Pearson, R. R. Bell, Susie Shaw, Georgia Darby, Mrs. John Mounts, Henry G. Beard and the Silver Moon Oil Company, claimants of certain tracts or parcels of land purchased by Fred Capshaw from the United States of America under patent dated February 17, 1920.
It is ordered that the receiver be and he is hereby authorized and directed to sink a well for oil and gas upon the land described in said patent at such place as the receiver shall select, provided said applicants shall pay in advance from time to time as required the cost and expense of sinking the same and bringing it into production. The said well shall be operated by the receiver as he operates wells on other lands in the river bed area, and he shall conserve and dispose of the proceeds of the oil and gas as in the case of wells on other lands in the river bed area, and shall reimburse the said Pearson et al. out of the net proceeds for the moneys so advanced and paid by them for drilling the well and bringing it into production; the remainder of such proceeds to be retained by him subject to the order of the court.
Claim of Eoff.
Upon motion of Luther Eoff, claiming to be owner of an oil and gas lease upon a certain tract of 500 acres of land described in his motion, situate on the flood plain on the south side of Red river, in range 15 west,
It is ordered that the receiver be and he is hereby authorized and directed to sink a well for oil and gas upon the land described in said motion at such place as the receiver shall select, provided said applicant shall pay in advance from time to time as required the cost and expense of sinking the same and bringing it into production. The said well shall be operated by the receiver as he operates wells on lands in the river bed area, and he shall conserve and dispose of the proceeds of the oil and gas as in the case of wells on lands in the river bed area, and shall reimburse the said Eoff out of the net proceeds for the moneys so advanced and paid by him for drilling the well and bringing it into production; the remainder of such proceeds to be retained by the receiver subject to the order of the court.
Claim of Armstrong et al.
Upon motion of J. R. Armstrong et al., and upon the assent of the receiver, it appearing that the receiver has in his hands a fund of approximately $50,000, being part of the proceeds derived by him from the production of receiver's wells Nos. 157, 162, and 170, operated by him for said Armstrong and for one C. J. Benson, under whom he claims by assignment,
It is ordered that Frederick S. Tyler, Esq., be and he is hereby appointed a special master to hear and report to this court for determination the claim of said J. R. Armstrong to have said fund turned over to him as purchaser of said wells, and said master shall hear and report on said claim and on all other claims that may be presented against said fund.
Said master shall have authority to issue process of subpoena to compel the attendance of witnesses, and it shall be his duty to give notice to all parties concerned, to fix the time and place of hearing, and adjourn the same from time to time if necessary, and he shall report all the evidence taken, together with his findings of fact, couclusions of law, and recommendation in the premises, for the ultimate consideration and action of this court.
If for any reason the said Frederick S. Tyler, Esq., shall be unable to act as such special master, or to complete his duties as such, a special master to act in his place shall be named by the Chief Justice or the senior Associate Justice of this court.
Instructions to Receiver.
Upon considering the fifth report of the receiver, filed herein May 26, 1921, it is ordered:
(1) That until further order all development work by the receiver (except as prescribed in certain other orders made this day) shall be confined to the completion of the wells in the river bed area, about 12 in number, work upon which already has been begun.
(2) That the receiver be and he is hereby authorized and directed to collect, withhold, and impound three-sixteenths of the gross proceeds of gas produced by wells within the receivership area from and after June 1, 1921.
(3) That the receiver be and he is hereby authorized to publish a notice in four daily newspapers, two circulating in Texas and two circulating in Oklahoma, to be selected by him, requesting all persons having claims against the receiver or against the property or funds in his custody to present the same to the receiver within 60 days from the date of publication of such notice, accompanying their statements of claim with supporting affidavits and certified or sworn copies of any documentary evidence upon which they may rely, and the receiver is directed to examine and investigate said claims and supporting evidence, and he is hereby authorized to settle and discharge the same if he can do so upon a fair and equitable basis, and as to any not so adjusted and settled he shall make a full report to this court at its next term for such further action as the court may deem proper.
Order Setting Intervening Petitions for Hearing.
It appearing that special issues have been joined in this cause (1) upon the intervening petition of E. Everitt Rowell, claimant of riparian land on the north bank of Red river, and the answer thereto of the United States embodied in paragraph II of its amended petition of intervention; (2) upon the intervening petition of A. E. Pearson, R. R. Bell, Susie Shaw, Georgia Darby, Mrs. John Mounts, Henry G. Beard, and the Silver Moon Oil Company, claimants of riparian lands on north bank of Red river, and the answer thereto of the United States embodied in paragraph II of its amended petition of intervention; (3) upon the amended petition of intervention of the Burk Divide Oil Company (Consolidated) and others, placer mining claimants, and the answer of the United States thereto embodied in paragraph III of its amended petition of intervention; (4) upon the petition of intervention of the Mellish Consolidated Placer Oil Mining Association, a placer mining claimant, and the answer thereto of the United States embodied in paragraph III of its amended petition of intervention; (5) and as between the state of Oklahoma and the United States as to the school sections abutting on Red river owned by said state, in respect to which it claims by riparian right the entire bed of Red river to the south bank, as said claim is set up in the original bill of said state and answered by the United States in paragraph II, subparagraph 10, of its amended petition of intervention:
It is ordered that this cause be and it is hereby set down for hearing as to said special issues, and as to the claims of any and all other interveners herein who may claim riparian lands on the north bank of Red river or placer mining locations under the mining laws of the United States, on the 17th day of October, A. D. 1921.
Frederick S. Tyler, Esq., of Washington, D. C., is hereby appointed as commissioner to take the evidence of the said respective parties with respect to said issues and claims, and report the same to the court, but without findings or conclusions. Said evidence shall be taken and closed on or before July 30, 1921. The evidence as to all said issues and claims shall be embodied in one record, but the evidence as to each issue or claim shall be set forth separately so far as practicable. Subject to the time fixed for closing said evidence, the time and place for commencing and proceeding with the taking of testimony, and the order in which the different matters shall be taken up, may be fixed by agreement of the parties, or in case of disagreement shall be fixed by the commissioner.
If for any reason the said Frederick S. Tyler shall be unable to act as such commissioner, or to complete his duties as such, a commissioner to act in his place shall be named by the Chief Justice or the senior Associate Justice of this court.
Order to Show Cause.
It appearing from the fifth report made by Frederick A. Delano, the receiver heretofore appointed by this court in the abovestated cause, that an action recently was commenced against him in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas by the Casa Oil Company to recover damages for the alleged conversion of certain personal property claimed by said Casa Oil Company and alleged to have been seized and appropriated by said receiver; and that a citation has been issued by said court commanding said receiver to appear in said cause and make answer to the petition therein at the next regular term of said court, to be held on the 21st day of November, A. D. 1921,
It is ordered that the Honorable James C. Wilson, Judge of the said United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, do show cause before this court, at the Capitol in Washington, in the District of Columbia, on the 17th day of October, A. D. 1921, why a writ of prohibition should not be issued commanding him to desist from further entertaining jurisdiction of said cause.
Reimbursement of Operators and Drillers.
It is ordered that Frederick A. Delano, receiver, be and he is hereby authorized, in his discretion, out of thirteen-sixteenths of the net proceeds of any well or wells in the river bed area (other than the well known as the Burk Senator) paid to him since April 1, 1920, to reimburse to those operators or drillers who had drilled and brought into production such well or wells, their actual cost of such work, including a reasonable allowance for field supervision, but excluding any allowance for general or office supervision, and after deducting a proper allowance for the yield derived by them from such well or wells prior to the taking possession of the same by the receiver.
Order Setting Cause for Further Hearing.
This court having on the 7th day of June, 1920, set this cause down for hearing upon specified questions of law, the hearing having been had, and the court having considered of the matter, and having announced its opinion and conclusion on April 11, 1921:
It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that according to the treaty of 1819 between the United States and Spain, as heretofore examined and construed by this court in the case of United States v. Texas, 162 U.S. 1, 16 Sup. Ct. 725, 40 L. Ed. 867, the decree in which is conclusive upon the parties to this cause, the true boundary between the state of Oklahoma and the state of Texas where it follows the course of the Red river from the 100th degree of west longitude to the eastern boundary of the state of Oklahoma is along the south bank of Red river. And as it still needs to be determined between the state of Oklahoma, complainant, and the United States of America, intervener, on the one hand, and the state of Texas, on the other hand, as to what constitutes the south bank of Red river, as to where along that bank the true boundary line is, and as to the proper mode of locating the same upon the ground,
It is, on motion of the state of Oklahoma, concurred in by the state of Texas and the United States of America, ordered that this cause be set down for hearing upon those questions on the 9th day of January, A. D. 1922.
And it is ordered that upon said hearing the parties shall be at liberty to refer to and use the evidence heretofore taken and returned in this cause so far as applicable to said question, without the necessity of republication or reprinting, and they shall proceed to take such further evidence as they may desire relating, among other things, to the characteristics and regimen of Red river, the physical conditions along the same, any substantial changes that may have occurred since the treaty by avulsions, relictions, erosions, accretions, or other natural causes, and the practical construction and application of the treaty of 1819 by the governments and states concerned and their inhabitants.
Frederick S. Tyler, Esq., of Washington, D. C., is hereby appointed as commissioner to take said further evidence and report the same to the court, but without findings or conclusions, and if for any reason said Frederick S. Tyler shall be unable to act as such commissioner, or to complete his duties as such, a commissioner to act in his place shall be named by the Chief Justice or the senior Associate Justice of this court.
Subject to the limitations hereinafter imposed, the times and places of taking such testimony, and the order of taking the same, may be fixed by stipulation of the parties, and, if they shall fail to stipulate, shall be fixed by the commissioner. The taking of testimony shall commence not later than the 15th day of August, 1921, and shall be concluded on or before the 29th day of October following. Unless the parties otherwise stipulate, the evidence in chief on the part of the United States shall be presented first, that on the part of the state of Oklahoma next, and that on the part of the state of Texas next, and the rebuttal evidence of the respective parties shall be presented in the same order.
The hearing on the counterclaim of the state of Texas, and the taking of testimony thereon, is reserved for further order.
Order as to Filing of Petitions in Intervention.
It is ordered that no petition in intervention may hereafter be filed herein under the order of June 7, 1920, except upon special leave given by the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse