OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/7th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 3

Chap. III.—An Act authorizing the discharge of Lawrence Erb from his confinement.
To be discharged from confinement.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the marshal of the district of Pennsylvania be authorized and directed to discharge Lawrence Erb, late a collector of the revenue of the United States, in the county of Northampton, in the district of Pennsylvania, from confinement, upon a judgment obtained against him in favor of the United States: Provided, That he take so much of an oath imposed upon persons imprisoned for debt by the second section of the act, entitled,1800, ch. 4. "An act for the relief of persons imprisoned for debt," as relates to his not having transferred his property with an intent to defraud the United States; and that he shall assign and convey all the estate, real and personal, which he may now own, or be entitled to, to some person or persons for the use and benefit of the United States, under the direction of the Secretary of the Treasury: Provided, also, That the said judgment shall remain in full force against any estate, real or personal, which the said Lawrence Erb may hereafter acquire, and that process may, at any time, be thereupon issued against the same.
Approved, February 3, 1802.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/7th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 34

Chap. XXXIV.—An Act for the relief of Theodosius Fowler.
Suit against Theodosius Fowler to be discontinued.Be it enacted, &c., That the comptroller of the treasury be, and he is hereby authorized and required to cause to be discontinued the suit now pending in the circuit court of the district of New York, in the name of the United States, against Theodosius Fowler, for moneys charged to him on the books of the treasury as advanced or paid on account or in consequence of a contract entered into by him with the Secretary of the Treasury on the twenty-eighth day of October, one thousand seven hundred and ninety, and that the said Theodosius Fowler be, and hereby is, discharged from the said demand.
Approved, April 29, 1802.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 67

Acts of the Eighty-Third United States Congress
United States Statutes At Large
Containing the
LAWS AND CONCURRENT RESOLUTIONS ENACTED DURING THE FIRST SESSION OF THE EIGHTY-THIRD CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
1953
AND
REORGANIZATION PLANS AND PROCLAMATIONS
Volume 67
In One Part
* List of Public Lawsv
* List of Reorganization Plansxxiii
* List of Private Lawsxxv
* List of Concurrent Resolutionsxxxiii
* List of Proclamationsxxxv
* Public Laws3
* Reorganization Plans631
* Private LawsA3
* Concurrent ResolutionsB3
* ProclamationsC3
* Subject IndexI
* Individual IndexCXVII
# United States v. Clarke (34 U.S. 168)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
34 U.S. 168
United States v. Clarke
APPEAL from the supreme court of East Florida.
The case was argued by Mr Call, for the appellants; and by Mr Wilde, for the appellee.
Mr Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Clark (94 U.S. 73)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
94 U.S. 73
The United States v. Cyrus C. Clark
Appeal from the Court of Claims
No. 797. Argued: January 16, 1877. --- Decided: January 29, 1877.
Our rules regulating appeals from the Court of Claims require that the record shall contain, among other things (Rule 1, sec. 2):
    "A finding by the Court of Claims of the facts in the case established by the evidence, in the nature of a special verdict, but not the evidence establishing them; and a separate statement of the conclusions of law upon said facts, on which the court founds its judgment or decree. The finding of facts and conclusions of law to be certified to this court as a part of the record."
The Act of Congress, under which this action was prosecuted, requires the Court of Claims to find, among other things, the amount of the loss which had been sustained. This is essential. In the finding of facts set up in this record, the amount of the loss does not appear. It is stated in the judgment as entered in form, and alluded to in the opinion of the court, but is entirely omitted from the special finding, which is to be in the nature of a special verdict, and upon which alone we are to act. The object of the rule is to bring the case here for our action as upon a special verdict, leaving us to apply the law to the facts as found, and not to decide upon the weight of the evidence.
Upon the facts set forth in the special finding, this judgment cannot be sustained, because of the omission to state the amount of the loss. As in our action upon the appeal we do not look beyond the finding, the judgment must be reversed on account of an insufficient finding, and the cause remanded for such further proceedings as law and justice may require.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Clark (96 U.S. 37)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
96 U.S. 37
The United States v. Cyrus C. Clark
Appeal from the Court of Claims
No. 804. Argued: January 14, 1878. --- Decided: February 25, 1878.
APPEAL from the Court of Claims.
This case was, on the appeal of the United States, before this court at the last term, and is reported in 94 U.S. 73, where the finding of the Court of Claims is stated.
The judgment below was then reversed, on account of an insufficient finding, and the cause remanded for further proceedings. Upon a subsequent trial, the Court of Claims made a further finding, and rendered judgment for Clark. The United States then brought the case here. As the additional finding is set forth in the opinion of this court, it is not necessary to insert it here.
Mr. Assistant-Attorney-General Smith for the United States.
Mr. Thomas H. Talbot, contra.
MR. JUSTICE MILLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Clarke

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Clarke."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Clarke (33 U.S. 436)
* United States v. Clarke (34 U.S. 168)
* United States v. Clarke (Hempst. 315), an 1844 decision by the U.S. District Court for the District of Arkansas
* United States v. Clarke (573 U.S. 248)
# United States v. White Bear Brewing Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
350 U.S. 1010
United States v. White Bear Brewing Company
Argued: April 9, 1956. --- Decided: May 28, 1956
See 351 U.S. 958, 76 S.Ct. 845.
Solicitor General Sobeloff, Acting Assistant Attorney General Rice and Mr. Harry Baum, for the United States.
Messrs. Kenneth F. Burgess, Edward P. Saltiel and William H. Avery, Jr., for respondents White Bear Brewing Co. and others.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Whitridge

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Whitridge."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Whitridge (197 U.S. 135)
* United States v. Whitridge (231 U.S. 144)
# United States v. Whitridge (197 U.S. 135)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
197 U.S. 135
United States v. Whitridge
Argued: January 27, 30, 1905. --- Decided: February 27, 1905
Assistant Attorney General McReynolds and Solicitor General Hoyt for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 135-138 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Albert Comstock, William R. Sears, Aldis B. Browne, Howard T. Walden, and Page, McCutcheon, & Knight for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 138-140 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Whitridge (231 U.S. 144)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
231 U.S. 144
United States v. Whitridge (231 U.S. 144)
Argued: October 21, 1913. --- Decided: November 10, 1913
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Graham for the United States.
Messrs. Joseph H. Choate, Jr., and Matthew C. Fleming for respondent in No. 466.
Messrs. Arthur H. Masten and Ellis W. Leavenworth for respondent in No. 467.
Mr. Justice Pitney delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. White Bear Brewing Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Douglas
United States Supreme Court
350 U.S. 1010
United States v. White Bear Brewing Company
Argued: April 9, 1956. --- Decided: May 28, 1956
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed.
Reversed.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, with whom Mr. Justice HARLAN concurs, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Whited & Wheless

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
246 U.S. 552
United States v. Whited & Wheless
Argued: March 19, 1918. --- Decided: April 15, 1918
[Syllabus on page 552 intentionally omitted.]
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Kearful, for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 552-555 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. T. Alexander and J. D. Wilkinson, both of Shreveport, La., for defendants in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 556-560 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice CLARKE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# University of Bombay

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "University of Bombay."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
# University Musical Encyclopedia/Vocal Music and Musicians: The Vocal Art; Great Vocalists; Famous Songs

Published in 1912 by the University Society, New York.

## Great Vocalists

* From the Beginnings of Opera to Catalani
* Angelica Catalani
* Luigi Lablache
* Giovanni Battista Rubini
* Giuditta Pasta
* Henriette Sontag
* Mario
* Maria Felicita Malibran
* Giulia Grisi
* Jenny Lind
* Seven Artists of Recent Times
# University of Calcutta Special Convocation Address 1921

UNIVERSITY OF CALCUTTA
SPECIAL CONVOCATION
for
CONFERRING AN HONORARY DEGREE
on
H. R. H. THE PRINCE OF WALES
on
Tuesday, the 27th December, 1921
Calcutta University Press
1921
PRINTED BY ATULCHANDRA BHATTACHARYYA
AT THE CALCUTTA UNIVERSITY PRESS, SENATE HOUSE, CALCUTTA.
* Address by Sir Asutosh Mookerjee
* Speech by H. R. H. the Prince of Wales
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Reports/Volume 545

* 545 U.S. 1 (2005) Gonzales v. Raich
* 545 U.S. 119 (2005) Spector v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd.
* 545 U.S. 162 (2005) Johnson v. California
* 545 U.S. 175 (2005) Bradshaw v. Stumpf
* 545 U.S. 193 (2005) Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I Ltd.
* 545 U.S. 209 (2005) Wilkinson v. Austin
* 545 U.S. 231 (2005) Miller-El v. Dretke
* 545 U.S. 308 (2005) Grable & Sons Metal Products Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Mfg.
* 545 U.S. 323 (2005) San Remo Hotel L.P. v. City and County of San Francisco
* 545 U.S. 469 (2005) Kelo v. New London
* 545 U.S. 677 (2005) Van Orden v. Perry
* 545 U.S. 748 (2005) Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales
* 545 U.S. 844 (2005) McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky
* 545 U.S. 913 (2005) MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.
* 545 U.S. 967 (2005) National Cable and Telecomm. Assn v. Brand X Internet Services
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/11th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 15

Chap. XV.—An Act making appropriations for the support of the Military establishment of the United States, for the year one thousand eight hundred and ten.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That for defraying the expenses of the military establishment of the United States, for the year one thousand eight hundred and ten, for the Indian department, and for the expense of fortifications, arsenals, magazines and armories, the following sums be, and the same hereby are respectively appropriated, that is to say:
Specific appropriations.For the pay of the army of the United States, eight hundred and sixty-nine thousand nine hundred and sixty-eight dollars.
For forage, sixty-four thousand six hundred and twenty-four dollars.
For subsistence, six hundred and eighty-five thousand five hundred and thirty-two dollars and five cents.
For clothing, two hundred and ninety-three thousand eight hundred and four dollars.
For bounties and premiums, thirty thousand dollars.
For the medical and hospital departments, fifty thousand dollars.
For camp equipage, fuel, tools and transportation, two hundred and seventy thousand dollars.
For ordnance, two hundred thousand dollars.
For fortifications, arsenals, magazines and armories, including two thousand dollars for such a number of additional military storekeepers as may be required, two hundred and eighty-three thousand five hundred and seventy-four dollars and seventy-five cents.
For purchasing maps, plans, books and instruments, two thousand five hundred dollars.
For contingencies, fifty thousand dollars.
For the salary of clerks employed in the military agents’ offices, and in the office of inspector of the army, three thousand five hundred dollars.
For the Indian department, one hundred and forty-six thousand six hundred dollars.
Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the several sums specifically appropriated by this act, shall be paid out of any monies in the treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, March 2, 1810.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/11th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 23

Chap. XXIII.—An Act to alter and amend an act, entituled “An act providing for the third census or enumeration of the inhabitants of the United States,” passed the twenty-sixth day of March, one thousand eight hundred and ten.
Act of March 26, 1810, ch. 17.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the enumeration mentioned in the first section of the act hereby amended, shall close within five months from the first Monday in August next, and the assistants shall make their returns to the marshals and secretaries within the said five months, any thing in the said act to the contrary notwithstanding.
Approved, April 12, 1810.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/11th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 19

Chap. XIX.—An Act to prevent the issuing of sea letters except to certain vessels.
To what vessels sea letters, &c. &c. may be granted, after June 30, 1810.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the thirtieth of June next, no sea letter or other document certifying or proving any ship or vessel to the property of a citizen or citizens of the United States, shall be issued except to ships or vessels duly registered, or enrolled and licensed as ships or vessels of the United States, or to vessels which at that time shall be wholly owned by citizens of the United States, and furnished with or entitled to sea letters or other custom-house documents, any law or laws heretofore passed to the contrary ​No sea letter to issue to any vessel unless such vessel return to the U. States before 30th June next. Proviso in favour of vessels detained abroad by any foreign power.notwithstanding: Provided nevertheless, that no sea letter shall be issued to any vessel which shall not at this time be furnished or entitled to a sea letter, unless such vessel shall return to some port or place in the United States or territories thereof on or before the said thirtieth day of June next: Provided nevertheless, that no sea letter or other document, certifying or proving any ship or vessel to be the property of a citizen or citizens of the United States, shall be issued to any vessel now abroad, which shall not at this time be furnished or entitled to a sea letter, unless such vessel shall arrive at some port or place in the United States or territories thereof, on or before the said thirtieth day of June next; and provided that nothing herein contained shall be construed to operate against any such vessel or vessels that now are, or may be, prior to the said thirtieth of June, detained abroad by the authority of any foreign power.
Approved, March 26, 1810.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/11th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 2

Chap. II.—An Act supplemental to an act entituled “An act extending the right of suffrage in the Indiana territory, and for other purposes.”
Act of May 7, 1800, ch. 41. Act of Feb. 27, 1809, ch. 19. Governor to apportion the representatives, and to issue his writ for the election.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the governor of the Indiana territory, for the time being, be, and he is hereby authorized and empowered to apportion the representatives among the several counties in said territory, as he shall think proper, having regard to the number limited in the fourth section of the act to which this is a supplement, and to issue his writ for the election of such representatives agreeably to the apportionment which he may make, at such time as he shall deem most convenient for the citizens of the several counties in said territory.
Afterwards to be apportioned by the general assembly.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That so soon as the legislature of said territory shall be convened, the number of representatives in each county thereof shall be regulated by the general assembly.
Governor to issue a proclamation for supplying vacancy in the delegation to Congress.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That when any vacancy shall occur in the legislative council, by death, resignation or removal from office, or when from either of said causes there shall be no delegate from said territory to the Congress of the United States, the governor shall ​in either case be authorized to issue his proclamation, directing en election to be held to supply such vacancy according to law.
Approved, December 15, 1809.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/11th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 20

Chap. XX.—An Act making an appropriation for the purpose of trying the practical use of the Torpedo or Submarine Explosion.
Appropriation to defray the expenses of experiments with the torpedo as an engine of war.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That a sum not exceeding five thousand dollars be, and the same is hereby appropriated, payable out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated, to defray the expense which shall be incurred in any actual experiments, when the President of the United States shall deem it expedient to cause such experiments to be made, which shall be made under the immediate direction of the Secretary of the Navy, for the purpose of ascertaining with precision how far the torpedo or submarine explosions may be usefully employed as engines of war, who is hereby directed to report to Congress the result of the experiment with his opinion thereon.
Approved, March 30, 1810.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/11th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 18

Chap. XVIII.—An Act for altering the time for holding the District Court in Ohio.
Act of Feb. 24, 1807, ch. 16, sec. 4. Terms of the district court at Chilicothe changed.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the sessions of the district court for the district of Ohio, by law appointed to be holden at Chilicothe, in the said district, on the first Mondays in February, June and October, shall hereafter be holden at Chilicothe, on the second Mondays of September and January annually.
Returns, &c. &c. to correspond with the change.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That all writs, process, and recognizances which may have been made returnable, and all suits, causes, process and proceedings, which may have been continued to the first Monday of June next, shall be and hereby are made returnable and continued over to the session of said court, which shall be holden on the second Monday of September next, and shall be as valid and proceeded on in the same manner, at said September session of said court, as if such writs, process, recognizances, suits, causes and proceedings had been originally made returnable to, and continued to said September session of said court.
Approved, March 26, 1810.