OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book VII/Hymn 17 (18)

17 (18). Prayer to Dhātar for blessings.
[Bhṛgu.—caturṛcam. sāvitram uta bahudmatyam. ānuṣṭubham: 1. 3-p. ārṣī gāyatrī; 3, 4. triṣṭubh.]
The first verse is found in Pāipp. i., the other verses in Pāipp. xx. For further correspondences, see under the several verses. In Kāuç. (59. 19), in the kāmya section, hymns 17, 19, 20, 24-26, 29, 42, 46, 51, 79, 80, 82, and 103 of this book are addressed to ​Prajāpati by one desiring all kinds of benefits (sarvakāma). Further, apparently (so Keçava and the comm.; the text of Kāuç. is not wholly clear), in a women's rite (35. 16), to procure the birth of a male child: the hymn offers little to suggest this save the recurrence of the phrase dhātā dadhātu; the verse v. 25. 10 would be much more to the point.
1. Let Dhātar assign (dhā) to us wealth, [he] being master (īç), lord of the moving creation; let him yield to us with fulness.
Literally (at the end) 'with full,' to which the comm. supplies dhanena. Ppp. shows no variants. TS. (ii. 4. 5$^1$ et al.) has dadātu in a, and vāvanat for yachatu at the end. MS. ⌊iv. 12. 6⌋ has only a (with dadhātu), combining it with our 2 b-d.
2. Let Dhātar assign to his worshiper an unexhausted further life; may we obtain the favor of the all-bestowing god.
TS. (iii. 3. 11$^3$), MS. (iv. 12. 6), AÇS. (vi. 14. 16)*, ÇÇS. (ix. 28. 3), and ÇGS. (i. 22), have the same verse, with sundry differences: all† read dadātu in a, and TS.MS. have no rayím for dāçúṣe (thus substituting our 1 a); in b, ÇÇS. and ÇGS. have akṣitim at end; in d, for viçvárādhasas, TS. has satyárādhasas, MS.ÇÇS.ÇGS. satyádharmaṇas, and AÇS. vājinīvatas. Ppp. is defective in this verse, but presents no variants. The comm. explains dhīmahi once by dhārayema and once by dhyāyema. *⌊So also AGS. (transl.), p. 36, note, as in AÇS.⌋ †⌊Save MS.⌋
3. Let Dhātar assign all desirable things unto the progeny-wishing worshiper in his home; for him let the gods wrap up immortality (amṛ́ta)—all the gods, Aditi, in unison.
This verse occurs only in TS. (iii. 3. 11$^3$) and MS. (iv. 12. 6), both reading alike: for a, dhatā́ dadātu dāçúṣe vásūni; mīḍhúṣe (for dāçúṣe) in b; amṛ́tāḥ sáṁ vyayantām in c; and devā́sas in d. Ppp. gives, for a, dhātā, viçvāni ⌊which rectifies the meter⌋ dāçuṣe dadātu; for c, tasyā prajām amṛtas saṁvayantu; and, in d, devāsas (rectifying the meter) ⌊and confirming my conjecture made at the former occurrence of this pāda at iii. 22. 1 d⌋.
4. Let Dhātar, Rāti, Savitar enjoy this, let Prajāpati, Agni our treasure-lord; let Tvashṭar, Vishṇu, sharing (rā) together with progeny, assign wealth to the sacrificer.
The beginning of this corresponds with that of iii. 8. 2, above. The verse is found without variant* in TS. (1. 4. 44$^1$); VS. (viii. 17) and MS. (i. 3. 38) have different readings: in b, after prajā́patir, VS. nidhipā́ devó agníḥ, MS. váruṇo mitró agníḥ; in c, MS. begins víṣṇus tváṣṭā, VS. ends -rarāṇā́s; in d, VS. ends dadhāta. Ppp., in d, has pūṣā instead of viṣṇus. ⌊MP. has c at i. 7. 12.⌋ *⌊Save nidhipátis for nidhípatis: cf. Gram. §1267 a.⌋
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book VII/Hymn 2

2. Of Atharvan.
[Atharvan (as above).—ātmadevatyam. trāiṣṭubham.]
Found also in Pāipp. xx. Used by Kāuç. (59. 18: the comm. says, hymns 2-5) in a kāmya rite, like the preceding hymn, with vi. 33, and vii. 6, 7, 16; and, according to the schol. (note to 30. 11), with hymn 3, in a healing ceremony.
Translated: Henry, 1, 48; Griffith, i. 328.
1. Father Atharvan, god-relative, mother's fœtus, father's spirit (ásu), young, who understands (cit) with the mind this sacrifice—him mayest thou proclaim to us here, here mayest thou speak.
Ppp. has a quite different version, reading viçvadevam instead of devabandhum in a, and, for c, d, ayaṁ ciketā ’mṛtasya dhāma nityasya rājaṣ paridhir apaçyat. The second half-verse is the same with 5. 5 c, d below. The accent of the second ihá seems to require that the sentence be divided between the two. ⌊The comm., to be sure, reads the second iha as accentless. Cf. Gram. §1260 c.⌋
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book VII/Hymn 18 (19)

18 (19). For rain, etc.
[Atharvan.—dvyṛcam. pārjanyam uta pārthivam. 1. 4-p. bhurig uṣṇih; 2. triṣṭubh.]
Found also in Pāipp. xx. For the use of this hymn by Kāuç. (41. 1; 103. 3; 26. 24, note) in various rites, in conjunction with iv. 15, see under the latter. Verse 2 appears ​in Vāit. (4. 8), in the parvan ceremonies, accompanying, with other verses, the offering of the patnīsaṁyāja oblations.
1. Burst forth, O earth; split this cloud of heaven; untie for us, O Dhātar, that art master, the skin-bag of the water of heaven.
Ppp. reads, for a, un nambhaya pṛthivīm, which is better; it reads bilam for dṛtim at the end; also udhno at beginning of c; not a single ms. has the right reading of this word, either here or in the other places ⌊cf. iii. 12. 4, n.⌋ where it occurs; here they vary between utnó (the great majority, including all SPP's pada-mss.), unnó, untó, utvó; the comm. reads correctly udnas, and SPP. receives it into his text; our ūdhnó was a mistaken emendation. Our Bp. leaves bhindhi unaccented, putting after it the mark of pāda division, and several of the mss. (including our P.s.m.E.p.m.I.) accent in saṁhitā accordingly. The verse is found also in TS. (ii. 4. 8$^2$) and MS. (i. 3. 26); both have a like Ppp.; MS. has adás for idám in b; both read udnó in c, and TS. has dehi for dhātar; and, in d, TS. has sṛjā for syā. The comm. gives three independent explanations of pra nabhasva: either prakarṣeṇa saṁgatā ucchvasitā bhava, or vṛṣtyā (? mss. kṛṣtyā, pṛṣtyā) prakarṣeṇa bādhitā mṛditā bhava, or ⌊nabhasva = nahyasva⌋ saṁnaddhā bhava. For dhātar, in c, he reads dhāta "= dhehi." The verse is really anuṣṭubh (resolving at the beginning pṛ-á). ⌊Play of words between nabhasva and nabhas: cf. iv. 7. 1.⌋ ⌊Correct ūdhnó to udnó.⌋
2. Not heat burned, not cold smote; let the earth, of quick drops, burst forth; waters verily flow ghee for him; where Soma is, there is it ever excellent.
In b, Ppp. reads sadasyate for nabhatām; in c, sadam for ghṛtam. With c compare RV. i. 125. 5 c.
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book VII/Hymn 19 (20)

19 (20). For progeny, etc.
[Brahman.—mantroktadevatyatn. jāgatam.]
Found also in Pāipp. xix. Kāuç. (35. 17) uses it in a women's rite, with an oblation in the lap of a woman desirous of offspring; and further (59. 19), with hymn 17 etc.: see under the latter.
Translated: Henry, 8, 60; Griffith, i. 337.
1. Prajāpati generates these offspring (prajā́s); let Dhātar, with favoring mind, bestow (dhā) [them]; harmonious, like-minded, of like origin; let the lord of prosperity put (dhā) prosperity in me.
The verse is to be compared with one in MS. (ii. 13. 23) and ĀpÇS. (xiv. 28. 4), of which the second pāda precisely agrees* with ours, and the fourth nearly (but reading puṣṭim puṣṭipatir); while for a both have ā́ naḥ prajā́ṁ janayatu prajā́patiḥ, and, for c, saṁvatsará ṛtúbhiḥ saṁvidānáḥ (ĀpÇS. ṛtubhiç cākupānaḥ†) and d is MB. ii. 4. 7 c.‡ Our c, nom. plur. words, is left without any construction (but emendation to sayonīs would make them accus., helping both the construction and the meter); Ppp. has the same c as MS., and also gives janayatu (for -ti) in a, as does the comm.; it is doubtless the better reading. Two of the pādas are triṣṭubh. *⌊But Āp. has dadātu.⌋ †⌊Intending ca a-kupānaḥ, as an isolated root-aorist pple? see Gram. §840 b.⌋ ‡⌊But with puṣṭim puṣṭipatir, like MS.Āp.⌋
# Atlantic Phosphate Company v. Grafflin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
114 U.S. 492
Atlantic Phosphate Company v. Grafflin
Samuel Lord, for plaintiff in error.
C. N. West and Jas. Lowndes, for defendant in error.
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic Refining Company v. Federal Trade Commission

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Goldberg
United States Supreme Court
381 U.S. 357
Atlantic Refining Company v. Federal Trade Commission
Argued: March 30, 1965. --- Decided: June 1, 1965
See 86 S.Ct. 18.
[Syllabus from pages 357-359 intentionally omitted]
Frederic L. Ballard, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., and John F. Sonnett, New York City, for petitioners.
Daniel M. Friedman, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic Refining Company v. Moller

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
320 U.S. 462
Atlantic Refining Company v. Moller
Argued: Dec. 7, 1943. --- Decided: Dec 20, 1943
See 321 U.S. 801, 64 S.Ct. 516.
Mr. Otto Wolff, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.
Mr. J. Harry La Brum, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic Refining Company v. Public Service Commission of New York

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
360 U.S. 378
Atlantic Refining Company v. Public Service Commission of New York
Argued: May 20, 21, 1959. --- Decided: June 22, 1959
Motion to Amend Judgment Denied Oct. 12, 1959.
[Syllabus from pages 378-379 intentionally omitted]
Mr. David T. Searls, Houston, Tex., for petitioners Atlantic Refining Co. et al.
Mr. Harry S. Littman, Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Tennessee Service Comm.
Mr. Kent H. Brown, Albany, N.Y., for respondent, Public Service Commission of State of New York.
Mr. Edward S. Kirby, Newark, N.J., (Messrs. David K. Kadane and Bertram D. Moll, Mineola, N.Y., on the brief), for respondents Long Island Lighting Co. and Public Service Electric & Gas Co.
Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Belinda (Milne)/Characters

BELINDA TREMAYNE......... Irene Vanbrugh. DELIA (her daughter)......... Isabel Elsom. HAROLD BAXTER.............. Dion Boucicault. CLAUDE DEVENISH........... Dennis Neilson-Terry. JOHN TREMAYNE............... Ben Webster. BETTY................................ Anne Walden.
# Belk v. Meagher

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
104 U.S. 279
Belk v. Meagher
ERROR to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Montana.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Samuel Shellabarger and Mr. E. W. Toole for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. J. C. Robinson and Mr. Richard T. Merrick, contra.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Belisarius

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Belisarius."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Belisarius, a poem by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
* Belisarius, a tragedy by Charlotte Brooke
# Bible (World English)/Enoch
## The Blessing of Enoch

$^1$ These are the words of the blessing of Enoch; according to which he blessed the chosen and righteous who must be present on the day of the distress, which is appointed, for the removal of all the wicked and impious. $^2$ And Enoch began his story and said: - There was a righteous man whose eyes were opened by the Lord, and he saw a Holy vision in the Heavens, which the Angels showed to me. And I heard everything from them, and I understood what I saw: but not for this generation, but for a distant generation that will come. $^3$ Concerning the Chosen I spoke; and I uttered a parable concerning them: The Holy and Great One will come out of his dwelling. $^4$ And the Eternal God will tread from there upon Mount Sinai, and he will appear in the strength of his power from Heaven. $^5$ And all will be afraid, and the Watchers will shake, and fear and great trembling will seize them, up to the ends of the earth. $^6$ And the high mountains will be shaken; and the high hills will be laid low and will melt like wax in a flame. $^7$ And the earth will sink, and everything that is on the earth will be destroyed, and there will be judgement upon all, and upon all the righteous. $^8$ But for the righteous: He will make peace, and he will keep safe the Chosen, and mercy will be upon them. They will all belong to God, and will prosper and be blessed, and the light of God will shine on them. $^9$ And behold! He comes with ten thousand Holy Ones; to execute judgement upon them and to destroy the impious, and to contend with all flesh concerning everything that the sinners and the impious have done and wrought against him.

## God's Laws

$^1$ Contemplate all the events in the sky; how the lights in the sky do not change their courses, how each rises and sets in order, each at its proper time, and they do not trangress their law. $^2$ Consider the earth and understand from the work that is done upon it, from the beginning to the end, that no work of God changes as it becomes manifest. $^3$ Consider the summer and the winter; how the whole earth is full of water and the clouds and the dew and rain rest upon it.
$^4$ Contemplate and see how all the trees appear withered and all their leaves are stripped - with the exception of the fourteen trees, which are not stripped, which remain with old leaves until the new come after two or three years.
$^5$ And, again, contemplate the days of summer; how at its beginning the sun is above it. You seek shelter and shade because of the heat of the Sun and the earth burns with scorching heat, and you cannot tread upon the earth or upon a rock, because of its heat.
$^6$ Contemplate how the trees are covered with green leaves and bear fruit. And understand, in respect of everything, and perceive how He Who Lives Forever made all these things for you. $^7$ And how His works are before Him in each succeeding year, and all His works serve Him and do not change; but as God has decreed - so everything is done. (To be continued)
# Baptism

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Baptism."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Baptism", a poem by Claude McKay
* "Baptism", an article by Gordon H. Clark
* The Baptism, a poem by Lydia Huntley Sigourney (1834)
* "Baptism," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Baptism," in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
* “Baptism”, in The Encyclopedia Americana, New York, 1920
# Banton v. Belt Line Railway Corporation

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
268 U.S. 413
Banton v. Belt Line Railway Corporation
Argued: March 11, 12, 1925. --- Decided: May 25, 1925
[Syllabus from pages 413-415 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Howard Thayer Kingsbury, M. M. Fertig, and George P. Nicholson, all of New York City, for appellants.
Mr. A. T. Davison, of New York City, for appellee.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baptist Faith and Message

* Baptist Faith and Message (1925)
* Baptist Faith and Message (1963)
# Begone Dull Care

* "Begone Dull Care", in New minstrel (n.d.), a chapbook printed in Glasgow
* "Begone Dull Care", in The Tired Soldier (n.d.), a chapbook printed in Greenock
* "Begone Dull Care", in The Singers' Companion (n.d.), a chapbook printed in Glasgow
* "Begone, Dull Care", in A First Series of Hymns and Songs (n.d.), edited by Henry Formby
* "Begone dull care", in Seven popular songs (n.d.), a chapbook printed in Glasgow
# Behemoth/Dedication

SIR HENRY BENNET, BARON OF ARLINGTON.
    My Lord,
I present your Lordship with four short dialogues concerning the memorable civil war in his Majesty’s dominions from 1640 to 1660. The first contains the seed of it, certain opinions in divinity and politics. The second hath the growth of it in declarations, remonstrances, and other writings between the King and Parliament published. The two last are a very short epitome of the war itself, drawn out of Mr. Heath’s chronicle. There can be nothing more instructive towards loyalty and justice than will be the memory, while it lasts, of that war. Your Lordship may do with it what you please. I petition not to have it published. But I pray your Lordship not to desist to be favourable as you have been, to me that am,
My Lord,
Your Lordship’s most humble and obliged servant,
THOMAS HOBBES.*
# Behemoth

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
BEHEMOTH; OR, THE LONG PARLIAMENT.
Printed by UNWIN BROTHERS CHILWORTH AND LONDON
BEHEMOTH
OR
THE LONG PARLIAMENT.
BY
THOMAS HOBBES
OF MALMESBURY.
EDITED FOR THE FIRST TIME FROM THE ORIGINAL MS.
BY
FERDINAND TÖNNIES, Ph.D.
London
SIMPKIN, MARSHALL, AND Co.
MDCCCLXXXIX
CONTENTS.
PAGE
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barr v. City of Columbia

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Barr v. Columbia, 378 U.S. 146 (1964), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States reversed the convictions of five African Americans who were refused service at a lunch counter of a department store based upon a prior Court decision, holding that there was insufficient evidence to support a breach of peace conviction and that criminal trespass convictions would be reversed for the reasons stated in another case that was decided that same day, Bouie v. City of Columbia, 378 U.S. 347 (1964). Bouie held that retroactive application of expanded construction of a criminal statute was barred by due process of ex post facto laws.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
378 U.S. 146
Barr v. City of Columbia
Argued: Oct. 14 and 15, 1963. --- Decided: June 22, 1964
Jack Greenberg, New York City, Matthew Perry, Columbia, S.C., and Constance B. Motley, New York City, for petitioners.
David W. Robinson, II, and John W. Sholenberger, Columbia, S.C., for respondent.
Ralph S. Spritzer, Washington, D.C., for the United States, as amicus curiae, by special leave of Court.
Mr. Justice BLACK, delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barr v. City of Columbia/Dissent Black

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Black
* Wikipedia article
United States Supreme Court
378 U.S. 146
Barr v. City of Columbia
Argued: Oct. 14 and 15, 1963. --- Decided: June 22, 1964
Mr. Justice BLACK, with whom Mr. Justice HARLAN and r. Justice WHITE join, dissenting from the reversal of the trespass convictions.
We have stated in our opinions in Bouie v. City of Columbia, 377 U.S. 363, 84 S.Ct. 1708, and Bell v. Maryland, 377 U.S. 318, 84 S.Ct. 1864, our belief that the mere fact that police responded to the call of a storekeeper and arrested people who were remaining in the store over his protest was not enough to constitute 'state action' within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. A review of the evidence in the case before us convinces us that the officers here did nothing which would justify a holding that they were acting for the State in any capacity except to arrest people who violated the trespass statute by remaining on the property of another after having been asked to leave. Petitioners' other objections relating to vagueness of the trespass statute and alleged absence of evidence to support the trespass convictions are identical to those which we considered and rejected in our opinion in Bouie. We believe therefore that the trespass convictions should stand.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Black v. Thorne

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
111 U.S. 122
Black v. Thorne
Chas. N. Black, for appellants.
D. B. Eaton, for appellees.
FIELD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Black v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Black v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Black v. United States (91 U.S. 267)
* Black v. United States (385 U.S. 26)
# Black v. J. W. Zacharie & Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
44 U.S. 483
Black v. J. W. Zacharie & Company

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Black v. United States (385 U.S. 26)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
385 U.S. 26
Black v. United States (385 U.S. 26)
Argued: Nov. 7, 1966. ---
Hans A. Nathan, Warren E. McGee and Bert B. Rand, for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall, for the United States.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Black v. Magnolia Liquor Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, news, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
355 U.S. 24
Black v. Magnolia Liquor Company
Argued: Oct. 17, 1957. --- Decided: Nov 12, 1957
Mr. Daniel M. Friedman, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Moise S. Steeg, Jr., New Orleans, La., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse