OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book VI/Hymn 89

89. To win affection.
[Atharvan.—mantroktadāivatam.* ānuṣṭubham.]
This hymn also, like the preceding, is wanting in Pāipp. Kāuç. (36. 10-11) applies it in a women's rite, for winning affection, addressing the head and ear, or wearing the hair, of the person to be affected. *⌊The Anukr. text is confused here; but the Berlin ms. seems to add manyuvināçanam.⌋
Translated: Weber, Ind. Stud. v. 242; Griffith, i. 293.
1. This head that is love's (? preṇí), virility given by Soma—by what is engendered out of that, do we pain (çocaya) thy heart.
Preṇí is as obscure to the comm. as to us; he paraphrases it by premaprāpaka 'that obtains (or causes to obtain) affection.' He takes vṛṣṇya as adj., treats pari prajātena in c as one word, and supplies to it snehaviçeṣeṣa. ⌊Whitney's O. combines tátas pári.⌋
2. We pain thy heart; we pain thy mind; as smoke the wind, close upon it (sadhryàñc), so let thy mind go after me.
The sign in our text denoting kampa in sadhryàñ should have been, for consistency's sake, 1 (as in SPP's text) and not 3; the mss., as usual, vary between 1 and 3 and nothing. The comm. reads sadhrim.
3. Unto me let Mitra-and-Varuṇa, unto me divine Sarasvatī, unto me let the middle of the earth, let both [its] ends fling (sam-as) thee.
The comm. renders samasyatām by saṁyojayatām.
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book VI/Hymn 90

90. For safety from Rudra's arrow.
[Atharvan.—rāudram. 1, 2. anuṣṭubh; 3. ārṣi bhurig uṣṇih.]
Found also in Pāipp. xix. (in the verse-order 2, 1, 3). Used by Kāuç. (31. 7) in a healing rite against sharp pain (çūla); also reckoned (note to 50. 13) to the rāudra gaṇa.
Translated: Grill, 14, 168; Griffith, i. 294; Bloomfield, 11, 506.
1. The arrow that Rudra hurled at thee, at thy limbs and heart, that do we now thus eject asunder from thee.
Ppp. has, for c, imāṁ tvām adya te vayam. The comm. understands the infliction to be the çūlaroga (colic?). ⌊In c, idám, 'thus' or 'herewith' i.e. 'with this spell'?⌋
2. The hundred tubes that are thine, distributed along thy limbs, of all these of thine do we call out the poisons.
Ppp. reads hirās for çatam in a, and sākam for vayam in c. The comm. takes nirviṣāṇi as a single word in d (= viṣarahitāni). ⌊Cf. i. 17. 3.⌋
3. Homage to thee, O Rudra, when hurling; homage to [thine arrow] when aimed (prátihita); homage to it when let fly; homage to it when having hit.
Ppp. has, in b, pratihitābhyas; in c, d, visṛjyamanābhyo namas trayatābhyaḥ (but in i., where the verse is also found, nipatitābhyaḥ). The verse is uṣṇih only by number of syllables.
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book VI/Hymn 92

92. For success of a horse.
[Atharvan.—vājinam. trāiṣṭubham: 1. jagatī.]
Found also in Pāipp. xix. Applied by Kāuç. (41. 21) in a rite for the success of a horse; and by Vāit. (36. 18) in the açvamedha, as the sacrificial horse is tied.
Translated: Ludwig, p. 459; Griffith, i. 295; Bloomfield, 145, 507.
1. Be thou, O steed (vājín), of wind-swiftness, being harnessed (yuj) go in Indra's impulse, with mind-quickness; let the all-possessing Maruts harness thee; let Tvashṭar put quickness in thy feet.
The verse is also VS. ix. 8, where, for b, is read índrasye ’va dákṣiṇaḥ çriyāt ’dhi. Ppp. puts bhava after vājin in a, and reads dāivyasya for viçvavedasas in c. The comm. gives an alternative explanation of viçvavedas, as often of its near equivalent jātavedas: viçvadhanaḥ sarvagocarajñāno vā. The Anukr., as often, takes no note of the triṣṭubh pāda d.
2. The quickness, O courser, that is put in thee in secret, also that went about committed to the hawk, to the wind—with that strength do thou, O steed, being strong, win the race, rescuing in the conflict.
3. Let thy body, O steed, conducting a body, run pleasance (vāmá) for us, protection for thyself; uninjured, great, a god for maintaining, may he set up his own light in the sky, as it were.
This is translated literally according to the AV. text, although comparison with the corresponding RV. verse (x. 56. 2) shows that its readings are in part pure corruptions. So, in b, RV. makes ⌊the meter good and⌋ the sense easy by giving dhā́tu for dhā́vatu; in c it has devā́n for devā́s (the comm. gives instead divas); and, in d, mimīyās (ā́ mimīyāt = āgacchatu, comm.). Ppp. has, for a, aste vājiṅ tanvaṁ vahantu; in c, avihvṛtas; in d, svarānasīvām. The verse is probably originally addressed to Agni, and added here only because of the occurrence of vājin at its beginning. The comm. understands tanvàm in a of a rider: ārūḍhasya sādinaḥ çarīram.
The ninth anuvāka, of 10 hymns and 32 verses, ends here; the old Anukr. is thus quoted: dvyadhikāv apacit.
# Bunny Brown and His Sister Sue on Grandpa's Farm

* related portals: Children's literature.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Second book in the Bunny Brown series.
BUNNY BROWN
AND HIS SISTER SUE
ON GRANDPA'S FARM
BY
LAURA LEE HOPE
AUTHOR OF
THE BUNNY BROWN SERIES, THE BOBBSEY TWINS SERIES, THE OUTDOOR GIRLS SERIES, ETC.
Illustrated by
Florence England Nosworthy
NEW YORK
GROSSET & DUNLAP
PUBLISHERS
Made in the United States of America
CONTENTS
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Beauty crowds me till I die

Beauty crowds me till I die Beauty mercy have on me But if I expire today Let it be in sight of thee —
# Beauty for Ashes

BEAUTY FOR ASHES;
OR,
The Old and the New Doctrine,
CONCERNING THE
STATE OF INFANTS AFTER DEATH,
CONTRASTED.
BY
B. F. BARRETT.
“For I say unto you, that their angels in the heavens do always behold the face of my Father which is in the heavens.”Matthew xviii. 10.
NEW YORK: D. APPLETON AND COMPANY, 346 AND 348 BROADWAY. 1855.
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1855, by B. F. BARRETT, In the Clerk's Office of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New-York.
To All, WHOKNOWHOW SWEET THEJOYOFPARENTALLOVE, ANDHOWBITTER THEPANGOFPARTING WITHA LOVEDANDLOVINGCHILD, THESEPAGESARE AFFECTIONATELYINSCRIBED BY
THEAUTHOR.
CONTENTS.
PART I.
PART II.
PREFACE.
It was once the custom, among Jewish women, to cast ashes upon their heads in seasons of mourning, by way of expressing their sorrow and grief; and on all joyous and festive occasions they wore, as an ornament of the head, an elegant tiara, or diadem, often set with costly pearls. This diadem or head-dress, called in our English version of the Jewish Scriptures "Beauty," was indicative of the inward joy and gladness of the wearer. It denoted a state the opposite of mourning. It, therefore, became customary among the Jews, when they wished to convey the idea that a state of sorrow and mourning had been succeeded by one of gladness and rejoicing, to say that the diadem had taken the place of the ashes. Hence the origin and import of that form of expression in Isaiah, "Beauty for Ashes," which we have chosen as an appropriate title to the following treatise: Appropriate—because the state of mind in which the Old doctrine concerning the condition of little children after death seems to have originated, is one of such apparent sadness and gloom, as is fitly symbolized by ashes cast upon the head; while the beau​tiful diadem, which was worn on occasions of festivity and joy, is an equally fit symbol of that opposite and joyous state, which the New doctrine on this subject can hardly fail to induce. The Old doctrine is a sad one, and consorts only with gloom; while the New doctrine is cheerful, and gladdens the heart with its serene sunshine.
For most of the authorities cited in Part I., the author thankfully acknowledges his indebtedness to the writer of some interesting and able articles in the Christian Examiner for 1827 and '28, in reply to the Rev. Dr. Beecher, on the subject of infant damnation.
To all who may deem the contrast between the Old and the New doctrine, as exhibited in the following pages, sufficient to justify the title adopted, I cordially commend a diligent and faithful perusal of the writings of the New Church; assuring them, as I do from a knowledge acquired by a patient and thorough personal examination of these writings, that, upon all other theological questions, they will find the contrast between the Old and the New equally striking.
B. F. B.
    Brooklyn, October 30, 1855.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Beauty for Ashes/Part 2

PART II.
THE NEW DOCTRINE;
OR
Beauty.
"The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light; they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them hath the light shined."—Is. ix. 2.
"Welcome Life! The Spirit strives!
Strength returns and hope revives;
Cloudy fears and shapes forlorn
Fly like shadows at the morn.—
O'er the earth there comes a bloom,
Sunny light for sullen gloom,
Warm perfume for vapor cold—
I smell the rose above the mould."
Thomas Hood.
# Beauty for Ashes/Part 1

PART I.
THE OLD DOCTRINE;
OR,
Ashes.
"And when I shall put thee out, I will cover the heaven, and make the stars thereof dark; I will cover the sun with a cloud, and the moon shall not give her light. All the bright lights of heaven will I make dark over thee, and set darkness upon thy land, saith the Lord."—Ezekiel xxxii. 7, 8.
"Thick darkness broodeth o'er the world:
The raven pinions of the night.
Close on her silent bosom furled,
Reflect no gleam of orient light."
S. H. Whitman.
# Biblical commentary the Old Testament/Volume VI. Lesser Prophets

* Daniel
* Introduction to The Twelve Minor Prophets
* Hosea
* Joel
* Amos
* Obadiah
* Jonah
* Micah
* Nahum
* Habakkuk
* Zephaniah
* Haggai
* Zechariah
* Malachi
# Candor—my tepid friend—

Candor — my tepid friend — Come not to play with me — The Myrrhs, and Mochas, of the Mind Are its iniquity —
# Blackwood's Magazine/261

BLACKWOOD'S
EDINBURGH MAGAZINE.
Contents.
| | page |
| Sir John Sinclair, | 1 |
| The Picture Gallery. (Conclusion), | 20 |
| Crystals from a Cavern, | 39 |
| The Athenian Democracy, | 44 |
| The World we Live in. No. IX. | 61 |
| The Cabinet; a Downing Street Operetta, | 78 |
| Revolt of the Tartars; or, Flight of the Kalmuck Khan and his People from the Russian Territories to the Frontiers of China, | 89 |
| The Barber's Supper, | 116 |
| Berryer, | 125 |
EDINBURGH: william blackwood and sons, 45, george street, edinburgh: and t. caddell, strand, london. To whom Communications (post paid) may be addressed. sold also by all the booksellers in the united kingdom. —————— printed by ballantyne and co. edinburgh.
# Blackton v. Gordon

United States Supreme Court
303 U.S. 91
Blackton v. Gordon
Argued: and Submitted Jan. 5, 1938. --- Decided: Jan 31, 1938
Messrs. Clement K. Corbin and E. A. Markley, both of Jersey City, N.J., for petitioner.
Mr. Aaron Gordon, of Jersey City, N.J., for respondent.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Blackwood's Magazine/Volume 1

BLACKWOOD'S
Edinburgh
MAGAZINE.
VOL. I.
APRIL—SEPTEMBER, 1817.
EDINBURGH:
PRINTED FOR WILLIAM BLACKWOOD,
NO 17, PRINCE'S STREET, EDINBURGH: AND
BALDWIN, CRADOCK, AND JOY,
PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON.
1817.
Oliver & Boyd, Printers, Edinburgh.
* No. 1: April 1817
* No. 2: May 1817
* No. 3: June 1817
* No. 4: July 1817
* No. 5: August 1817
* No. 6: September 1817
# Blackwood's Magazine/Volume 1/Issue 1

BLACKWOOD'S
EDINBURGH MAGAZINE.
| No. I. | APRIL 1817. | Vol. I. |
* Original Communications
** Memoir of the Late Francis Horner, Esq. M.P.
** On the Sculpture of the Greeks
** Present State of the city of Venice
** On the Constitution And Moral Effects of Banks For the Savings of Industry
** Tales And Anecdotes of the Pastoral Life
** Observations On the Culture Of the Sugar Cane In the United States, And On Our System Of Colonial Policy
** Memorandums of a View-hunter
** Account of the American Steam Frigate
** On Sitting Below the Salt
** The Chaniological Controversy.
** on the Proposed Establishment of a Foundling Hospital In Edinburgh
** Remarks On Greek Tragedy (No. 1)
** Notices Concerning the Scottish Gypsies
* Select Extracts
** Account of Colonel Beaufoy's Journey to the Summit Of Mount Blanc
** Account of the Remarkable Case of Margaret Lyall
* Antiquarian Repertory
** Grant of the Lands of Kyrkenes
** Writ of Privy Seal
** Act of Privy Council
** The Wyfe of Auchtermuchtie
** Account of the Highland Host
** Extract
* Original Poetry
** The Desolate Village
** Italy
** Verses
* Review of New Publications
* Periodical Works
* Literary and Scientific Intelligence
* Works Preparing For Publication
* Monthly List of New Publications
* Monthly Register
** Foreign Intelligence
** Proceedings of Parliament
** British Chronicle
** Commercial Report
** Agricultural Report
** Meteorological Table
** Births, Marriages, and Deaths
# Blackstone v. Miller

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
188 U.S. 189
Blackstone v. Miller
Argued: January 5, 6, 1903. --- Decided: January 26, 1903
Messrs. Edward W. Sheldon and Robert Wilkinson for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 189-195 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Louis Marshall and Julius Offenbach for defendants in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 195-202 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# British note recognising the People’s Republic of China

* related portals: China, United Kingdom.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is the text of the note by which the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland recognised the Government of the People's Republic of China as the legal government of China. The note was delivered at 6am on 6 January 1950 in Peking (Beijing). Upon delivering the note, the British also informed the PRC Government that it had withdrawn recognition from the Government of the Republic of China. The Republic of China's ambassador in London, Dr. Cheng Tien-hsi, had been informed of the withdrawal of British recognition from his Government on 5 January 1950. The text is as reported in The Times’ edition of 7 January 1950
To: Mr. Chou En-lai, The Minister for Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China
I have the honour to inform your Excellency that his Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, having completed their study of the situation resulting from the formation of the Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China, and observing that it is now in effective control of by far the greater part of the territory of China, have this day recognized that Government as the de jure Government of China.
In these circumstances his Majesty's Government, in response to Chairman Mao Tse-tung's proclamation of October 1, 1949, are ready to establish diplomatic relations on the basis of equality, mutual benefit, and mutual respect for territory and sovereignty, and are prepared to exchange diplomatic representatives with the Central People's Government. Pending the appointment of an ambassador, Mr. J. C. Hutchison has been nominated as his Majesty's Charge d'Affaires ad interim.
Accordingly I have the honour to request that you will receive him and transact official business with him in that capacity, and further that he may be granted all necessary facilities for the transfer of himself, his staff; and the archives of his Majesty's Embassy from Nanking to Peking.
(Signed) ERNEST BEVIN, his Britannic Majesty's Principal Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.
# British and Foreign State Papers/Volume 155/Constitution of the Kingdom of Siam

Layout 2
​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/886 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/887 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/888 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/889 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/890 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/891 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/892 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/893 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/894 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/895 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/896 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/897 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/898 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/899 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/900 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/901 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/902 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/903 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/904 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/905 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/906 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/907 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/908 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/909 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/910 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/911 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/912 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/913 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/914 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/915 ​Page:British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 155 (1958).djvu/916
Footnotes
# Britt v. North Carolina

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Blackmun
United States Supreme Court
404 U.S. 226
Britt v. North Carolina
Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of North Carolina
No. 70-5041 Argued: October 14, 1971 --- Decided: December 13, 1971
Petitioner was convicted of murder a month after his previous trial had ended with a hung jury. Both trials took place in a small town before the same judge and with the same counsel and court reporter, who (as was conceded) was well known to defense counsel and other local lawyers and would have read back his notes to defense counsel before the second trial had he been asked to do so. Between the two trials petitioner, alleging indigency, filed a motion for a free transcript, which the trial court denied. The appellate court affirmed the conviction, holding that an adequate alternative to the transcript was available.
Held: In the narrow circumstances of this case, a transcript was not needed for petitioner's defense. Pp. 227-230.
8 N.C. App. 262, 174 S.E. 2d 69, affirmed.
MARSHALL, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and STEWART and WHITE, JJ., joined. BLACKMUN, J., filed a statement concurring in the result, post, p. 230. DOUGLAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which BRENNAN, J., joined, post, p. 230.
Robert G. Bowers argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Christine Y. Denson, Assistant Attorney General of North Carolina, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Robert Morgan, Attorney General.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Brittan v. Barnaby

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
62 U.S. 527
Brittan v. Barnaby
[Syllabus from pages 527-529 intentionally omitted]
THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the districts of California, sitting in admiralty.
It was a libel filed by Brittan, under the circumstances stated in the opinion of the court. The District Court dismissed the libel, and the Circuit Court affirmed the decree.
It was argued by Mr. Sherwood for the appellant, and Mr. Broom for the appellee.
The points only made by the counsel can be noticed. On the part of the appellant, they were the following:
1. The principle of mercantile law, that the consignee of the goods has a right to insist that they shall be discharged from the vessel, and that he may examine them before he makes himself liable for the freight, is elementary.
The carrier is not at liberty to insist that the goods shall not be be landed before he can call upon the merchant for freight. (Abbott on Shipping, 5th Am. ed., pp. 375, 376, 377; 3d Kent's Com., p. 214, and the notes and authorities there cited; Flanders on Shipping, p. 281, art. 281; Certain Logs of Mahogany, 2d Summer, 600; The Salmon Falls Manufacturing Co. v. The bark Tangier; Op. Justice Curtis; Monthly Law Reporter for May, 1858, p. 6.) This principle is also fully established by the civil law. (1 Valin, Liber 6, tit. 3, p. 665.)

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# British communiqué concerning the Constitution of Ireland

* related portals: United Kingdom, Ireland.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
The communiqué was issued by the Office of the Prime Minister on 29 December 1937. The text is as reported in The Times’ edition of 30 December 1937.
His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom have considered the position created by the new Constitution which was approved by the Parliament of the Irish Free State in June, 1937, and came into force on December 29. They are prepared to treat the new Constitution as not effecting a fundamental alteration in the position of the Irish Free State, in future to be described under the new Constitution as 'Eire' or 'Ireland', as a member of the British Commonwealth of Nations.
His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom have ascertained that his Majesty's Governments in Canada, the Commonwealth of Australia, New Zealand, and the Union of South Africa are also prepared so to treat the new Constitution.
His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom take note of Articles 2, 3, and 4 of the new Constitution. They cannot recognize that the adoption of the name Eire or Ireland, or any other provisions of those Articles, involves any right to territory or jurisdiction over territory forming part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, or affects in any way the position of Northern Ireland as an integral part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. They therefore regard the use of the name Eire or Ireland in this connexion as relating only to that area which has hitherto been known as the Irish Free State.
# Blair v. County of Cuming

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
111 U.S. 363
Blair v. County of Cuming
Uriah Bruner, for defendant in error.
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Blair v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
323 U.S. 600
Blair v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company
Argued: Jan. 2, 3, 1945. --- Decided: Jan 29, 1945
Mr. J. Thomas Hoffman, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for petitioner.
Mr. Charles J. Margiotti, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse