OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Bradley v. United States (104 U.S. 442)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
104 U.S. 442
Bradley v. United States
APPEAL from the Court of Claims.
Certain sugars imported in the year 1869 and seized for the owner's alleged violation of the revenue laws, were duly libelled, condemned, and sold. In the District Court, where the proceedings were had, no party appeared praying for an informer's share of the net proceeds, or for the distribution of them. They were paid into the treasury, and by the Secretary of the Treasury in part distributed, that is to say, one-half to the United States, which was covered into the treasury, and one-fourth in equal shares to the collector, the surveyor, and the naval officer of the port. Those officers claimed also the remaining fourth. Bradley and others, each claiming as informer or seizing officer, asserted a right thereto. Bradley brought this suit therefor, April 27, 1872. On May 9 of that year the Secretary ordered that the one-fourth so undistributed be paid in equal parts to those officers, but that each of them should first give a bond with surety for his returning to the treasury, on demand, the money so paid to him, should the Court of Claims, or this court on appeal, decide that any other claimant was entitled to the fund. The required bond was given and the money paid.
The United States took the depositions of Dillingham, the collector of the port, and Sheldon, the surety on his bond. Bradley moved to suppress them, on the ground that the deponents were interested in the event of the suit. The court overruled the motion.
The court expressed 'no final opinion on the subject' of its jurisdiction; but, holding that on the merits the claimant had no cause of action, dismissed his petition, and he appealed.
Mr. Charles E. Hovey and Mr. Alexander Porter Morse for the appellant.
The Solicitor-General, contra.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bradley v. United States (404 U.S. 567)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
404 U.S. 567
Bradley v. United States
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
No. 71-5431
Certiorari granted; 447 F. 2d 264, vacated and remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the indictment.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Baugh

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Field
United States Supreme Court
149 U.S. 368
Baltimore Company v. Baugh
Statement by Mr. Justice BREWER: John Baugh, defendant in error, was employed as a fireman on a locomotive of the plaintiff in error, and while so employed was injured, as is claimed, through the negligence of the engineer in charge thereof. He commenced a suit to recover for these injuries in the circuit court of the United States for the southern district of Ohio.
The circumstances of the injury are these: The locomotive was manned by one Hite, as engineer, and Baugh, as fireman, and was what is called in the testimony a 'helper.' On May 4, 1885, it left Bellaire, Ohio, attached to a freight train, which it helped to the top of the grade about 20 miles west of that point. At the top of the grade the helper was detached, and then returned alone to Bellaire. There were two ways in which it could return, in conformity to the rules of the company: one, on the special orders of the train dispatcher at Newark, and the other, by following some regular scheduled train, carrying signals to notify trains coming in the opposite direction that the helper was following it. This method was called in the testimony 'flagging back.' On the day in question, without special orders, and not following any scheduled train, the helper started back for Bellaire, and on the way collided with a regular local train, and in the collision Baugh was injured. Baugh had been in the employ of the railroad company about a year, had been flreman about six months, and had run on the helper, two trips a day, about two months. He knew that the helper had to keep out of the way of the trains, and was familiar with the method of flagging back.
No testimony was offered by the defendant, and at the close of plaintiff's testimony the defendant asked the court to direct a nonsuit, which motion was overruled, to which ruling an exception was duly taken. In its charge to the jury the court gave this instruction: 'If the injury results from negligence or carelessness on the part of one so placed in authority over the employe of the company, who is injured, as to direct and control that employe, then the company is liable.' To which instruction an exception was duly taken. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for $6,750, and upon this verdict judgment was entered, to reverse which the railroad company sued out a writ of error from this court.
John K. Cowen, J. H. Collins, and Hugh L. Bond, Jr., for plaintiff in error.
L. Danford, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice BREWER, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Burns

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
124 U.S. 165
Baltimore Company v. Burns
John K. Cowen and Hugh L. Bond, Jr., for plaintiff in error.
Albert Constable, for defendants in error.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Berry

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
286 U.S. 272
Baltimore Company v. Berry
Argued: April 26, 1932. --- Decided: May 16, 1932
Messrs. Rudolph J. Kramer and Bruce A. Campbell, both of East St. Louis, Ill., for petitioner.
Mr. John S. Marsalek, of St. Louis, Mo., for respondent.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Boston & Maine Railroad Maryland Port Authority

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
373 U.S. 372
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Boston & Maine Railroad Maryland Port Authority
See 374 U.S. 859, 83 S.Ct. 1862.
Robert W. Ginnane, Washington, D. C., Jervis Langdon, Jr., and William L. Marbury, Baltimore, Md., for appellants.
J. William Doolittle, Washington, D. C., Thomas E. Dewey, New York City, and Robert G. Bleakney, Jr., Sudbury, Mass., for appellees.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Boston & Maine Railroad Maryland Port Authority/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Wikipedia article
United States Supreme Court
373 U.S. 372
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Boston & Maine Railroad Maryland Port Authority
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bible (Douay-Rheims)

The Douay-Rheims Bible, also known as the Rheims-Douai Bible or Douai Bible and abbreviated as D-R, is a translation of the Bible from the Latin Vulgate into English. The New Testament was published in one volume with extensive commentary and notes in 1582. The Old Testament followed in 1609–10 in two volumes, also extensively annotated. The notes took up the bulk of the volumes and had a strong polemical and patristic character. They also offered insights on issues of translation, and on the Hebrew and Greek source texts of the Vulgate. The purpose of the version, both the text and notes, was to uphold Catholic tradition in the face of the Protestant Reformation which was heavily influencing England. As such it was an impressive effort by English Catholics to support the Counter-Reformation.
The Douay–Rheims Bible, however, achieved little currency, even among English-speaking Catholics, until it was substantially revised between 1749 and 1752 by Richard Challoner, an English bishop, formally appointed to the deserted see of Debra. Challoner's revisions borrowed heavily from the King James Version whose translators had themselves borrowed from the original Rheims NT of 1582. Challoner not only addressed the odd prose and many of the Latinisms, but produced a version which, while still called the Douay–Rheims, was little like it. At the same time he aimed for improved readability and comprehensibility, rephrasing obscure and obsolete terms and construction; and in the process, consistently removing ambiguities of meaning that the original Rheims–Douay version had striven to retain.Warning: template has been deprecated.
* The Holie Bible, first published edition, 1582-1610. (incomplete)
* The Holy Bible, first illustrated edition by Iohn Covstvrier, 1633-1635. (incomplete)
* Challoner's Revision, ed. Richard Challoner, 1749–1752.
# Bible (Douay-Rheims, 1633-1635)

This edition of the Douay-Rheims Bible published by Iohn Covstvrier at Rouen consists of a one-volume New Testament (1633) and a two-volume Old Testament (1635). Together, it forms a three-volume Bible as did the first edition of 1582-1610. This was the last edition published until the Challoner revision of 1750.
The 1633 New Testament portion of this Bible was illustrated for the first time with engravings of each Evangelist at the start of their respective Gospels. The engravers were Michel Van Locham and Piquet who produced a total of 8 copper plates for this work. The text is an exact reprint, albeit with spelling changes, of the 1600 Rheims New Testament which had some of its notes augmented and rearranged from the first edition of 1582.
THE CENSURE AND APPROBATION of the first Edition of this Translation of the New Testament.
CVM huius versionis ac editionis Authores, nobis de fide & eruditione sint probe cogniti, aliique S.Theologiæ & linguæ Anglicanæ peritissimi viri contestati sint, nihil in hoc opere reperiri, quod non sit Catholicæ Ecclesiæ doctrinæ, & pietati consentaneum, vel quod vllo modo potestati ac paci ciuili repugnet, sed omnia potius veram fidem, Reip. bonum, vitæque ac morum probitatem promouere: ex ipsorum fide censemus ista vtiliter excudi & publicari posse.
       PETRVS REMIGIVS, Archidiaconus maior Metropolitanæ insignis Ecclesiæ Rhemensis, Iuris Canonici Doctor, Archiepiscopatus Rhemensis generalis Vicarius.
       HVBERTVS MORVS, Rhemensis Ecclesiæ Decanus, & Ecclesiastes, & in sacratissimæ Theologiæ facultate Doctor.
       IOANNES LE BESGVE, Canonicus Rhemensis, Doctor Theologus, & Cancellarius Academia Rhemensis.
       GVLIELMVS BALBVS, Theologiæ Professor, Collegii Rhemensis Archimagister.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bi-Metallic Investment Company v. State Board of Equalization

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 239 U.S. 441 (1915), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that due process protections only attach to administrative activities in which a small number of people are concerned, who are exceptionally affected by the act, in each case upon individual grounds. By contrast, rule-making or quasi-legislative activities that affect a large number of people without regard to the facts of individual cases do not implicate due process protections. It is an important case in American administrative law.
United States Supreme Court
239 U.S. 441
Bi-Metallic Investment Company v. State Board of Equalization
Argued: December 7 and 8, 1915. --- Decided: December 20, 1915
Mr. Horace Phelps for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 442 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Fred Farrar, Attorney General of Colorado, and Messrs. Norton Montgomery, James A. Marsh, and George Q. Richmond for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
359 U.S. 520
Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
Argued: March 30, 31, 1959. --- Decided: May 25, 1959
Mr. William C. Wines, Chicago, Ill., for appellants.
Mr. David Axelrod, Chicago, Ill., for appellees.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bibi - His Mark

   Bibi I'Tueur was his name—Bibi the Killer.
   As far back as he could remember—and his memory started with a day thirty years earlier when, at the advanced age of seven, a capped, velvet-trousered gentleman called Toto Laripette kicked him out into the street and told him to sink or swim on his own hook, he personally didn't give a damn which—as far back as he could remember he had had no other name: Bibi—though the latter half of his name, the Killer, pronounced as the case may be with love, fear, envy, respect, admiration, or hatred, came later on—deservedly.
Bibi ~ His Mark
by Achmed Abdullah
Author of "Master of the Hour," "The Charmed Life," "The God of the Invincibly Strong Arms," etc.
* I. BIBI L'TEUR.
* II. "IN AGAIN, OUT AGAIN."
* III. AVEC INFÂMIE.
* IV. THE MILK OF HUMAN KINDNESS.
* V. CLASS CONSCIOUSNESS.
* VI. CAPTAIN DANIÉLOU.
* VII. GRAF VON BASCHWITZ.
* VIII. TWO GRAVES.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1945, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 78 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bank of Jasper v. First National Bank of Rome Ga First National Bank of Jasper Fla

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
258 U.S. 112
Bank of Jasper v. First National Bank of Rome Ga First National Bank of Jasper Fla
Argued: and Submitted Jan. 12, 1922. --- Decided: Feb 27, 1922
(Nos. 73, 74): Mr. Wm. Wade Hampton, of Gainesville, Fla., for petitioner.
Mr. Henry C. Clark, of Jacksonville, Fla., for respondents.
(Nos. 76, 77):
Mr. F. P. Fleming, of Jacksonville, Fla., for petitioner.
Messrs. W. E. Kay and Henry C. Clark, both of Jacksonville, Fla., for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from page 113 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bank of Georgia v. Higginbottom

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
34 U.S. 48
Bank of Georgia v. Higginbottom

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bank of Hamilton v. Jun

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
27 U.S. 492
Bank of Hamilton v. Jun

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable/Abambou

​Abam′bou. The evil spirit of the Camma tribes in Africa. A fire is kept always burning in his house. He is supposed to have the power of causing sickness and death.
# Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable/Abate

​Abate (2 syl.) means properly to knock down. (French, abattre, whence a battue, i.e., wholesale destruction of game; O.E. a beátan.)
Abate, in horsemanship, is to perform well the downward motion. A horse is said to abate when, working upon curvets, he puts or beats down both his hind legs to the ground at once, and keeps exact time.
# Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable/Abbassides

​Abba′ssides (3 syl.). A dynasty of caliphs who reigned from 750–1258. The name is derived from Abbas, uncle of Mahomet. The most celebrated of them was Haroun-al-Raschid (born 765, reigned 786–808).
# Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable/Abatement

​Abatement, in heraldry, is a mark of dishonour annexed to coat armour, whereby the honour of it is abated.
# Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable/Abaddon

​Abaddon. The angel of the bottomless pit (Rev. ix. 11). The Hebrew abad means "he perished."
"The angell of the bottomlesse pytt, whose name in the hebrew tonge is Abadon."—Tindale.
# Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable/Abandon

​Abandon means put at anyone's orders; hence, to give up. (Latin, ad, to; bann-um, late Latin for "a decree.")
# Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable/Abaris

​Ab′aris. The dart of Abaris. Abaris, the Scythian, was a priest of Apollo; and the god gave him a golden arrow on which to ride through the air. This dart rendered him invisible; it also cured diseases, and gave oracles. Abaris gave it to Pythagoras.
"The dart of Abaris carried the philosopher wheresoever he desired it."—Willmott.
# Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable/Abaton

​Ab′aton. (Greek α not; βαίνω, I go.) As inaceessible as Abăton. Artemisia, to commemorate her conquest of Rhodes, erected two statues in the island, one representing herself, and the other emblematical of Rhodes. When the Rhodians recovered their liberty they looked upon this monument as a kind of palladium, and to prevent its destruction surrounded it with a fortified enclosure which they called Abaton, or the inaccessible place. (Lucan speaks of an island difficult of access in the fens of Memphis, called Abăton.)
# Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable/Abandon fait larron

​Abandon fait larron. As opportunity makes the thief, the person who neglects to take proper care of his goods, leads into temptation, hence the proverb, "Neglect leads to theft."
# Birdcraft/Front matter

Birdcraft/Front matter
BIRDCRAFT
A FIELD BOOK OF TWO HUNDRED SONG GAME, AND WATER BIRDS
BY
MABEL OSGOOD WRIGHT
AUTHOR OF "THE FRIENDSHIP OF NATURE,” “TOMMY ANNE” “CITIZEN BIRD,” ETC.
WITH EIGHTY FULL-PAGE PLATES BY LOUIS AGASSIZ FUERTES
New York THE MACMILLAN COMPANY LONDON: MACMILLAN & CO., Ltd.
1903
All rights reserved
Copyright, 1895,
By MACMILLAN AND CO.
Copyright, 1897,
By THE MACMILLAN COMPANY.
Set up and electrotyped April, 1895. Reprinted January, 1896. Reprinted, with additions, and new illustrations, October, 1897; June, 1899; December, 1900; April 1903.
Northwood Press
J.S.Cushing & Co.—Berwick & Smith
Norwood Mass. U.S.A.
To I. O. W.
A RECORD OF HAPPY FIELD DAYS ABOUT HOME
Waldstein, Fairfield, Conn. March 1, 1895

## License

This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Birdcraft/Junco hyemalis

* related portals: Birds.
* related authors: Louis Agassiz Fuertes.
* sister projects: Commons category.
Snowbird
Plate 29.
Slate - coloured Junco.
Length 6 inches.
Slate-coloured Junco: Junco hyemalis
Snowbird.
Plate 29. No. 2.

## Length

    6-6.50 inches.

## Male and Female

    Dark bluish slate all over, except lower breast and
belly, which are grayish white and form a vest. Several outer tail feathers white, conspicuous in ﬂying. Female, with a more rusty cast and vest less distinct. Bill ﬂesh-white, dusky at tip.

## Song

    A crisp call note, a simple trill, and a faint whispering warble, usually much broken, but not without sweetness. (Bicknell.) Song sometimes heard before it leaves in spring.

## Season

    Common winter resident; late September to April.

## Breeds

    From the higher parts of the Alleghanies and northern New York and northern New England, northward.

## Nest

    On ground, Sparrow-like.

## Eggs

    4—6, White, peppered with reddish brown.

## Range

    North America at large, but chiefly east of the Rocky Mountains; south in winter to the Gulf States.
# Birdcraft/Plate 1

Plate 1.
Meadowlark.
Length, 10.75 inches.
(See page 169.)
# Bird v. United States (187 U.S. 118)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
187 U.S. 118
Bird v. United States
Argued: October 14, 1902. --- Decided: November 17, 1902
Messrs. L. T. Michener, W. W. Dudley, and Malony & Cobb for plaintiff in error.
Assistant Attorney General Beck and Mr. Charles H. Robb for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse