OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Have a Heart (Bolton, Kern and Wodehouse)/My Wife My Man

Is this just a dream once more? Just the dream I dreamt before

## Verse 1

Ruddy: Oh, the sad time I've had, Peggy dear, away from you, Peggy: Oh, yes, I believe you were glad Of the holiday, It's true. Confess! Ruddy: Why it drove me half mad I could find, I swear, No plan Of life, Peggy: Was it really so bad? Did you really care? My man! Ruddy: My Wife!

## Refrain

There's only just we two In all the world, you see. For I was made for you You dear, for me! You dear for me! And life may bring us joy. Or Life may bring us pain Cruel or kind we shall not mind Now we're together once again. Gladness and grief alike we'll share Grief will be joy if you are there.

## Verse 2

Peggy: Ruddy dear, do you fear That perhaps you may regret? Ruddy: Not I! Do you wish, now you're here, You were miles away? Peggy: My pet! I'd die! Ruddy: Can you trust to me, dear, To be always true Through life? Peggy: I can; All my doubts disappear As I cling to you, Ruddy: My wife! Peggy: My man!

## Refrain

The road that lies before Is dark and hard to see. what e'er fate holds in store, Try it with me! Try it with me! What through we missed it once. We did not understand. Better today we know the way So let us set out hand in hand. Love for our path a light we'll make shining to guide the steps we take.
# Have you got a Brook in your little heart

* "Have you got a brook in your little heart?" in Poems (1890)
* "Have you got a brook in your little heart" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# For all we have and are

* "For all we have and are", in A treasury of war poetry, British and American poems of the world war, 1914-1919 (1917)
* "For All We Have and Are", in Rudyard Kipling's Verse, Inclusive Edition, 1885-1918 (1919)
# For mercies, countless as the sands

What shall I render by John Newton
    For mercies, countless as the sands,
    Which daily I receive
    From Jesus, my Redeemer's hands,
    My soul what canst thou give?
    Alas! from such a heart as mine,
    What can I bring him forth?
    My best is stained and dyed with sin,
    My all is nothing worth.
    Yet this acknowledgment I'll make
    For all he has bestowed;
    Salvation's sacred cup I'll take
    And call upon my God.
    The best returns for one like me,
    So wretched and so poor;
    Is from his gifts to draw a plea,
    And ask him still for more.
    I cannot serve him as I ought,
    No works have I to boast;
    Yet would I glory in the thought
    That I shall owe him most.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# For a Picture of Saint Cecilia attended by Angels

* For a Picture of Saint Cecilia attended by Angels, in The Winter's Wreath, 1831.
* For a Picture of Saint Cecilia attended by Angels, in National Lyrics, and Songs for Music (Miscellaneous Poems), 1834.
# For each ecstatic instant

* "Compensation" in Poems: Second Series (1891)
* "For each ecstatic instant" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# From Afong, Photographer

​FROM
AFONG,
PHOTOGRAPHER
NO. ROAD,
291 PUBLIC GARDEN AND ALBANY, HONGKONG.
289 PUBLIC GARDEN & GOVERNMENT HOUSE, HONG KONG.
314 PRAYA GRANDE FROM MR. ENDICOTT'S GARDEN.
325 ALLEY IN CAMOENS GARDEN, MACAO.
328 MACOK TEMPLE AT MACAO.
183 FLOWER PAGODA IN CANTON.
188 CHINESE LARGE JOSS.
225 SHAMEEN, CANTON.
239 PIC-NIC PARTY AT LEE-MINGCOON (CANTON.)
240 LEE-MING-COON GARDEN, CANTON.
147 PIC-NIC PARTY AT GREEN ISLAND, (SWATOW.)
149 KATCHIO VIEW, (SWATOW.)
151 DR. SCOTT'S HOUSE, SWATOW.
154 SWATOW HARBOUR.
156 VIEW IN SWATOW.
157 VIEW OF CUSTOM HOUSE AT SWATOW.
54. Church and Houses of Methodist Episcopal Mission.
CHUNG-ANG, SINGING WOMEN (NEAR SING CHANG).
COUNTRY WOMEN CULLING TEA (NEAR SING CHANG).
3.—ISLAND OF KOOLANSOO AND AMOY.
Island of Koolansoo and harbor and town of Amoy taken from the rock at the back of the United States Consulate.
7. —AMUNG-KANG, AMOY.
Interior view of the Lum-poo-toh Joss House at Amung-kang, Amoy.
CHIN-CHEW.
No.39.—Triumphal arch erected in honor of See How for good services rendered by him to the Emperor.
ARECA (BETEL-NUT) PALMS, IN BLOOM.
FORMOSA.
No. 62.—THE TSUI-WHANS (WATER SAVAGES) AT TSUI-SIA.
SAVAGE HUT AND PEOPLE AT TSUI-SIA.
KEELUNG CITY AND HARBOR, LOOKING EASTWARD.
VIEW AT TANSUI.
Thos, Child
Public Gardens, Shanghai, Looking down the River
Double Island, Entrance to Swatow Harbor,
Part of the Bund, Shanghai.
English Church of Shanghai.
Rattan Ware Shop, Shanghai.
Garden Bridge & Astor House on the Hong Que Side, Shanghai.
Hong Que, Shanghai, 1860.
Wedding procession
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1958, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 65 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# From Ali Ben Abu Taleb

* "He who has a thousand friends has not a friend to spare" in May-day and other pieces (1867)
* From Ali Ben Abu Taleb in Poems (Household Edition, 1904)
# From Beyond

Written in 1920. First published in The Fantasy Fan, June 1934.
* "From Beyond" in Weird Tales, 31 (2) (February 1938)
* From Beyond (hplovecraft.com)
# From Alcuin

* From Alcuin in May-day and other pieces (1867)
* From Alcuin in Poems (Household Edition, 1904)
# From Benjamin Rush to Granville Sharp

Memoirs of Granville Sharp: With Observations on Mr. Sharp's biblical Criticisms by the r. r. the lord bishop of St. David's, 1 May 1773
Sir, Philadelphia, May 1st, 1773
From the amiable character which I have received of you from my worthy friend Mr. Anth. Benezet, I have taken the liberty of introducing myself to your correspondence by sending you a pamphlet entitled An Address to the Inhabitants of the British Settlements in America, It was written amidst many interruptions, from a business which admits of but little leisure for studies or pursuits of that nature — I mean the profession of physic. Few of the arguments are new; and yet I have endeavoured, by their conciseness, to give them new force. A spirit of humanity and religion begins to awaken, in several of the colonies, in favor of the poor Negroes. The clergy begin to bear a public testimony against this violation of the laws of nature and Christianity. Nothing of consequence, however, can be done here till the ax is laid to the root of the African Company. —Great events have been brought about by small beginnings. Anthony Benezet stood alone a few years ago, in opposing Negro slavery in Philadelphia; and now three-fourths of the province, as well as the city, cry out against it. I sometimes please myself with the hopes of living to see it abolished, or put upon another footing in America.
The pamphlet will be left at the Pennsylvania Coffee-house in Birchin Lane. Should you incline to reprint it, please to make such alterations in it as you think proper.
With esteem for your virtues, and in particular for your zeal in behalf of the Negro slaves in America,
I am, sir, with great respect, &c. &c.
Benjamin Rush
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# From Bells Weekly Messenger

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
From Notebook c.1808-1811 p.59.

#### The original text:

From Bells Weekly Messenger Augst 4. 1811.
Salisbury July 29
A Bill of Indictment was preferred against Peter Le Cave for Felony but returnd Ignoramus by the Grand jury. It appeard that he was in extreme indigence but was an Artist of very superior Merit[.] while he was in Wilton [Jail]<Goal> he painted many Pieces in the Style of Morland some of which are stated to be even superior to the performances of that Artist. with whom Le Cave lived many years as a Professional Assistant & he states that many Paintings of his were only Varnished over by Morland & sold by that Artist as his own. Many of the Principal Gentlemen of the County have visited Le Cave in the Goal & declared his drawings & Paintings in many instances to excel Morlands. The Writer of this Article has seen many of Le Caves Works& tho he does not pretend to the knowledge of an artist yet he considers them as Chaste delineations of Rural Objects.
Such is the Paragraph It confirms the Suspition I entertained concerning those two [Prints] I Engraved From for J. R. Smith. That Morland could not have Painted them as they were the works of a Correct Mind & no Blurrer
________________________________________

## Notes

* ↑ "The Complete Poetry & Prose of William Blake", ed. by David V. Erdman, Anchor Books, 1988, p. 694-5. [Memoranda from the Notebook] From Bells Weekly Messenger The paragraph from Salisbury occurs in the 8th page, under the heading SUMMER ASSIZES. In the Notebook Blake copied it beside and below his emblematic drawing of Ugolino in prison. In his comment Blake refers to two prints he engraved, from paintings by Morland, i.e. Le Cave. The deleted word is confusing, though legible enough, because he began by writing about “two Prints” but concluded by turning the focus on those two (paintings) he engraved from.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Getting Married/Marriage Nevertheless Inevitable

Now most laws are, and all laws ought to be, stronger than the strongest individual. Certainly the marriage law is. The only people who successfully evade it are those who actually avail themselves of its shelter by pretending to be married when they are not, and by Bohemians who have no position to lose and no career to be closed. In every other case open violation of the marriage laws means either downright ruin or such inconvenience and disablement as a prudent man or woman would get married ten times over rather than face. And these disablements and inconveniences are not even the price of freedom; for, as Brieux has shewn so convincingly in Les Hannetons, an avowedly illicit union is often found in practice to be as tyrannical and as hard to escape from as the worst legal one.
We may take it then that when a joint domestic establishment, involving questions of children or property, is contemplated, marriage is in effect compulsory upon all normal people; and until the law is altered there is nothing for us but to make the best of it as it stands. Even when no such establishment is desired, clandestine irregularities are negligible as an alternative to marriage. How common they are nobody knows; for in spite of the powerful protection afforded to the parties by the law of libel, and the readiness of society on various other grounds to be hoodwinked by the keeping up of the very thinnest appearances, most of them are probably never suspected. But they are neither dignified nor safe and comfortable, which at once rules them out for normal decent people. Marriage remains practically inevitable; and the sooner we acknowledge this, the sooner we shall set to work to make it decent and reasonable.
# Getting Married/Marriage as a Magic Spell

The truth which people seem to overlook in this matter is that the marriage ceremony is quite useless as a magic spell for changing in an instant the nature of the relations of two human beings to one another. If a man marries a woman after three weeks acquaintance, and the day after meets a woman he has known for twenty years, he finds, sometimes to his own irrational surprise and his wife's equally irrational indignation, that his wife is a stranger to him, and the other woman an old friend. Also, there is no hocus pocus that can possibly be devized with rings and veils and vows and benedictions that can fix either a man's or woman's affection for twenty minutes, much less twenty years. Even the most affectionate couples must have moments during which they are far more conscious of one another's faults than of one another's attractions. There are couples who dislike one another furiously for several hours at a time; there are couples who dislike one another permanently; and there are couples who never dislike one another; but these last are people who are incapable of disliking anybody. If they do not quarrel, it is not because they are married, but because they are not quarrelsome. The people who are quarrelsome quarrel with their husbands and wives just as easily as with their servants and relatives and acquaintances: marriage makes no difference. Those who talk and write and legislate as if all this could be prevented by making solemn vows that it shall not happen, are either insincere, insane, or hopelessly stupid. There is some sense in a contract to perform or abstain from actions that are reasonably within voluntary control; but such contracts are only needed to provide against the possibility of either party being no longer desirous of the specified performance or abstention. A person proposing or accepting a contract not only to do something but to like doing it would be certified as mad. Yet popular superstition credits the wedding rite with the power of fixing our fancies or affections for life even under the most unnatural conditions.
# Getting Married/Monogamy, Polygyny and Polyandry

The number of wives permitted to a single husband or of husbands to a single wife under a marriage system, is not an ethical problem: it depends solely on the proportion of the sexes in the population. If in consequence of a great war three-quarters of the men in this country were killed, it would be absolutely necessary to adopt the Mohammedan allowance of four wives to each man in order to recruit the population. The fundamental reason for not allowing women to risk their lives in battle and for giving them the first chance of escape in all dangerous emergencies: in short, for treating their lives as more valuable than male lives, is not in the least a chivalrous reason, though men may consent to it under the illusion of chivalry. It is a simple matter of necessity; for if a large proportion of women were killed or disabled, no possible readjustment of our marriage law could avert the depopulation and consequent political ruin of the country, because a woman with several husbands bears fewer children than a woman with one, whereas a man can produce as many families as he has wives. The natural foundation of the institution of monogamy is not any inherent viciousness in polygyny or polyandry, but the hard fact that men and women are born in about equal numbers. Unfortunately, we kill so many of our male children in infancy that we are left with a surplus of adult women which is sufficiently large to claim attention, and yet not large enough to enable every man to have two wives. Even if it were, we should be met by an economic difficulty. A Kaffir is rich in proportion to the number of his wives, because the women are the breadwinners. But in our civilization women are not paid for their social work in the bearing and rearing of children and the ordering of households; they are quartered on the wages of their husbands. At least four out of five of our men could not afford two wives unless their wages were nearly doubled. Would it not then be well to try unlimited polygyny; so that the remaining fifth could have as many wives apiece as they could afford? Let us see how this would work.
# General Electric Company v. Wabash Appliance Corporation

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
304 U.S. 364
General Electric Company v. Wabash Appliance Corporation
Argued: March 4, 1938. --- Decided: May 16, 1938
Messrs. Merrell E. Clark and Hubert Howson, both of New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, for respondents.
Mr. Justice REED, delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# General Forrest

GENERAL FORREST—A CONFEDERATE.
Camp Song—Written by Gen. J. R. Chalmers, 1864.
Air—“Columbia, the Home of the Brave.”
The day of our destiny was darkened, The heart of the Nation stood still, When Forts Henry and Donelson surrendered, And Johnston fell back to Nashville. But the clouds, which then thickened around us, Served only the plainer to show The form of that hero arising To deliver us all from the foe.
Chorus
Here’s to Forrest from the brave Tennessee, Here’s to Forrest from the brave Tennessee, In our hearts he will triumph forever, Here’s to Forrest from the brave Tennessee.
At Shiloh he charged a division And covered our army’s retreat; At Murfreesboro won his promotion When Crittenden acknowledged defeat. Next Streight went careering before him, Expecting our rear to assail, But Forrest, with his fair maiden pilot, Soon landed the robber in jail.
Chorus—
Chickamauga, Chattanooga, Okolona, Memphis and Tishomingo Creek, Union City, Fort Pillow and Paducah, All, the deeds of our hero bespeak. Now Athens, Sulphur Springs and Pulaski Have aroused old Sherman from his lair, For the boldest of Yankee commanders Will tremble with Forrest in his rear.
Chorus—
Next Johnsonville attracted his attention Where Sherman had collected his stores, And the gunboats, once terrible to mention, Floated grandly and proudly at its doors. But Forrest’s artillery battalion, Morton, Rice, Ed Walton and Thrall, Soon set fire to his gunboats and transports, Nor ceased till they had burned them all.
Chorus—
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# General Frankie: A Story For Little People

Harper's new monthly magazine. / Volume 24, Issue 141. February, 1862.

### Contents

* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
* Chapter VII
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Green Bay Canal Company v. Patten Paper Company (173 U.S. 179)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
173 U.S. 179
Green Bay Canal Company v. Patten Paper Company
This is a petition, by the defendants in error, for a rehearing of the case of Green Bay & M. Canal Co. v. Patten Paper Co. (decided at the present term) 172 U.S. 58, 19 Sup. Ct. 97.
The reasons set forth in the petition and accompanying brief seem to go upon a misapprehension of the scope and meaning of the decision of this court.
Thus it is made matter of complaint that this court did not deal with questions concerning the division of the waters of Fox river after they had spent the force or head given them by the dam and canal, and had passed into a nonnavigable portion of the stream below the improvement; and it is suggested that we overlooked the fact that a private dam had been constructed between islands 3 and 4.
But those are questions to which the jurisdiction of this court does not extend, and hence could not be considered by us. The purport of our decision was to preserve to the Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Company the use of the surplus waters created by the dam and canal. After such waters had flowed over the dam and through the sluices, and had found their way into the unimproved bed of the stream, the rights and disputes of the riparian owners must be determined by the state courts.
Again, apprehensions are expressed lest the decision in the present case may be construed so as to injury parties using water powers at other places in the river, and who are not represention in the present controversy.
We are not ready to presume that the authorities of the United States will either permit or make changes in the places where the surplus waters are to be used by the Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Company, so as to deprive other parties of the water powers they have been using for so many years, unless such changes are found to be necessary and proper in the regulation and delivery of the surplus waters created by the public improvement. But such questions are not now before us.
While the courts of the state may legitimately take cognizance of controversies between the riparian owners, concerning the use and apportionment of the waters flowing in the nonnavigable parts of the stream, they cannot interfere by mandatory injunction or otherwise with the control of the surplus water power incidentally created by the dam and canal now owned and operated by the United States.
The petition for a rehearing is denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Green Bay Minnesota Company v. Union Steam-Boat Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
107 U.S. 98
Green Bay Minnesota Company v. Union Steam-Boat Company
W. C. Larned, for plaintiff in error.
F. J. Lamb, for defendant in error.
GRAY, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Green Bay Canal Company v. Patten Paper Company (173 U.S. 179)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
173 U.S. 179
Green Bay Canal Company v. Patten Paper Company
[Syllabus from pages 179-189 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice SHIRAS delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Green Bay Tree

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Green Bay Tree."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* The Green Bay Tree (1924), a novel by Louis Bromfield
* The Green Bay Tree (1894), a novel by William Henry Wilkins
# Green Bay Canal Company v. Patten Paper Company

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Green Bay Canal Company v. Patten Paper Company."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Green Bay Canal Company v. Patten Paper Company (172 U.S. 58)
* Green Bay Canal Company v. Patten Paper Company (173 U.S. 179)
# Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego

* related portals: Psychology.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
GROUP PSYCHOLOGY
AND
THE ANALYSIS OF THE EGO
BY
SIGMUND FREUD, M.D., LL.D.
AUTHORIZED TRANSLATION
BY
JAMES STRACHEY
BONI AND LIVERIGHT
Publishers :: :: New York
TRANSLATOR'S NOTE
A comparison of the following pages with the German original (Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse, Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag, Vienna, 1921) will show that certain passages have been transferred in the English version from the text to the footnotes. This alteration has been carried out at the author's express desire.
All technical terms have been translated in accordance with the Glossary to be published as a supplement to the International Journal of Psycho-Analysis.
J. S.
CONTENTS