OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Company (240 U.S. 650)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
240 U.S. 650
Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Company (240 U.S. 650)
Argued: February 28, 1916. --- Decided: April 3, 1916
This cause coming on to be heard on the report of the inspector heretofore appointed to observe operations of the plant and works of defendant the Ducktown Sulphur, Copper, & Iron Company, Limited, and upon consideration thereof
It is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed (and all former decrees are accordingly modified) as follows:
1. That defendant the Ducktown Sulphur, Copper, & Iron Company, Limited, hereafter shall not permit escape into the air from its works of fumes carrying more than 45 per cent of the sulphur contained in green ores subjected to smelting.
2. That it shall not hereafter from April 10th to October 1st in any year permit escape into the air of gases the total sulphur content of which shall exceed 25 tons during one day, and not more than 50 tons per day shall be permitted to escape at other times.
3. That it shall keep a daily record of the amount of green ores smelted, sulphur in green ore, acid made, sulphur in acid, per centum of sulphur recovered, sulphur escaping, and per centum of sulphur escaping, so that statements may be compiled therefrom substantially the same as table 3, page 19, printed report of the inspector. It shall also keep a weather record showing direction and velocity of wind, humidity, temperature, and pressure at intervals of six hours. These records, verified by the oath of a responsible officer or employee of the defendant, shall be reported to the clerk of this court immediately after the end of each calendar month.
4. That it shall deposit with the clerk of this court an additional sum of $125.40 to cover expenses and compensation of inspector.
5. That the clerk shall pay to Dr. John T. McGill, inspector heretofore appointed, the sum of $3,375.40-$3,000 being compensation for services, and $375.40 to meet expenses incurred in excess of payments heretofore made to him.
6. The costs of the proceedings in the cause from February 24, 1914, to this date, will be charged to defendant the Ducktown Sulphur, Copper, & Iron Company, Limited; costs accruing prior to February 24, 1914, will be divided equally between the Tennessee Copper Company and the Ducktown Sulphur, Copper, & Iron Company, Limited.
7. The cause will be retained on the docket until further order of the court.
April 3, 1916.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company v. Grosjean

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
301 U.S. 412
Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Company v. Grosjean
Argued: March 30, 31, 1937. --- Decided: May 17, 1937
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
Messrs. Monte M. Lemann, of New Orleans, La., Robert L. Wright, of Chicago, Ill., and J. Blane Monroe, of New Orleans, La., for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 413-415 intentionally omitted]
Mr. E. Leland Richardson, of Baton Rouge, La., for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from Page 416 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Great A, little a

English nursery rhyme (Roud Folk Song Index 20113)
* "Great A, little a" in Tommy Thumb's Pretty Song Book (1744)
* "Great A, little a" in Dorsetshire Children's Games, &c by John Symonds Udal (The Folk-Lore Journal, 1889)
* "Great A, little a, Bouncing B" in A Book of Nursery Songs and Rhymes by Sabine Baring-Gould (1895)
* "Great A, little a" in A Book of Nursery Rhymes by Charles Welsh (1901)
* "A B C" in The Real Mother Goose by Blanche Fisher Wright (1916)
# Great Britain and The Czecho-Slovaks/Cover

Czecho-slovakian Foreigners’ Office.
Great Britain and The Czecho-Slovaks.
By
Vladimir Nosek, Secretary to the Czecho-slovak Legation in London.
Prague 1919. Published by Czecho-slovakian Foreigners’ Office. Printed by Dr. Edv. Grégr & son.
# Great, Wide, Beautiful, Wonderful World

* related portals: Nursery rhymes.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Great, wide, beautiful, wonderful World, With the wonderful water round you curled, And the wonderful grass upon your breast-- World, you are beautifully drest.
The wonderful air is over me, And the wonderful wind is shaking the tree, It walks on the water, and whirls the mills, And talks to itself on the tops of the hills.
You friendly Earth! how far do you go, With the wheat-fields that nod and the rivers that flow, With cities and gardens, and cliffs, and isles, And people upon you for thousands of miles?
Ah, you are so great, and I am so small, I tremble to think of you, World, at all; And yet, when I said my prayers to-day, A whisper inside me seemed to say, "You are more than the Earth, though you are such a dot: You can love and think, and the Earth cannot!"
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Company v. Supermarket Equipment Corp

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, quotes, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
340 U.S. 147
Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Company v. Supermarket Equipment Corp
Argued: Oct. 18, 19, 1950. --- Decided: Dec 4, 1950
See 340 U.S. 918, 71 S.Ct. 349.
Mr. John H. Glaccum, New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Townsend F. Beaman, Washington, D.C., for respondents.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Harassment Prevention and Responses for DoD Civilian Employees

DoD Instruction 1020.04
Harassment Prevention and Responses for DoD Civilian Employees
| Originating Component: | Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness |
| Effective: | June 30, 2020 |
| Releasability: | Cleared for public release. Available on the Directives Division Website at https://www.esd.whs.mil/DD/. |
| Incorporates and Cancels: | Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum, “Hazing and Bullying Prevention and Response in the Armed Forces,” December 23, 2015 |
| Approved by: | Matthew P. Donovan, Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness |
Purpose: In accordance with the authority in DoD Directive (DoDD) 5124.02, this issuance:
* Establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and prescribes procedures for preventing and responding to harassment in the DoD civilian employee population.
* Provides guidance for processing, resolving, and tracking allegations of harassment.
* Distinguishes between harassment that detracts from an efficient workplace, equal employment opportunity (EEO) complaints of unlawful discriminatory harassment, and harassment of a criminal nature.
* Outlines training and education requirements and standards.
Table of Contents
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Happy the Souls to Jesus Joined

Happy the souls to Jesus joined, And saved by grace alone, Walking in all His ways they find Their heaven on earth begun.
The Church triumphant in Thy love, Their mighty joys we know; They sing the Lamb in hymns above, And we in hymns below.
Thee in Thy glorious realm they praise, And bow before Thy throne, We in the kingdom of Thy grace: The kingdoms are but one.
The holy to the holiest leads, From thence our spirits rise, And he that in Thy statutes treads Shall meet Thee in the skies.
# Hapsburg Liebe

Extracted from the Licking Valley Courier, 1921 Nov 8 p. 3. A brief write-up announcing a new serial by him.
Hapsburg Liebe
Hapsburg Liebe (Charles Haven Liebe), a native of the Tennessee mountains has been soldier, timberjack and sawmill man. In his education he was denied even the little red school house, his alma mater being a log structure in the hills which he left by way of a window at twelve years of age. But he had a taste for reading and has acquired a fine command of English and a writing style through study of the best authors.
At seventeen he commenced writing and turned out eighteen stories, all rejected by the editors. He was almost discouraged; but his nineteenth effort stuck with a respectable magazine. Lack of education made the way doubly hard; but now, when he sells all he writes, he will tell you that the experience was worth all all it cost.
Gritty! Indeed he is! At eighteen he joined a regiment for service in the Philippines. Times to entrain found him ill with pneumonia. Against the wishes of his captain and the orders of his doctor, he accompanied the outfit, being carried to the cars by his buddies. Most of his stories are about the Tennessee and Kentucky mountaineers. They are his people and better than any other writer, he knows and loves them. "The Clan Call," his most delightful tale, will soon start as a serial in this paper. Your misfortune if you miss it.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Four Excellent New Songs (3)/The Answer

THE ANSWER.
# Four Excellent New Songs (3)/The Considerate Nymph

THE CONSIDERATE NYMPH.
FINIS.
# Four Excellent New Songs (3)/Johnny's Grey-Breeks

JOHNNY's GREY BREEKS.
# Four Excellent New Songs (3)/The Tempest

THE TEMPEST.
# Four Favorites

a Golden Age of Comic Books comics series that ran for 32 issues from September, 1941 through December, 1947
These comics are in the public domain, and various publishers and creators have used them since.

## Cover Gallery

* Issue 1 September, 1941
* Issue 2
* Issue 3 January, 1942
* Issue 4 March, 1942
* Issue 5 May, 1942
* Issue 6 July, 1942
* Issue 7 October, 1942
* Issue 8 December, 1942
* Issue 9 January, 1943
* Issue 10 May, 1943
* Issue 11 August, 1943
* Issue 12 November, 1943
* Issue 13 February, 1944
* Issue 14 May, 1944
* Issue 15 August, 1944
* Issue 16 November, 1944
* Issue 17 February, 1945
* Issue 18 May, 1945
* Issue 19 August, 1945
* Issue 20 November, 1945
* Issue 21 January, 1946
* Issue 22 March, 1946
* Issue 23 May, 1946
* Issue 24 July, 1946
* Issue 25 September, 1946
* Issue 26 November, 1946
* Issue 27 January, 1947
* Issue 28 March, 1947
* Issue 29 June, 1947
* Issue 30 August, 1947
* Issue 31 October, 1947
* Issue 32 December, 1947
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works could have had their copyright renewed between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st of the 29th year.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Four Excellent New Songs (3)

Dated from period of activity of publisher and internal evidence
FOUR EXCELLENT NEW SONGS;
ENTITLED
Johnny's Grey-Breeks With the Answer.
THE TEMPEST. The Considerate NYMPH.
[Printed by J. Chalmers & Co. Castlestreet Aberdeen.]
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Four Favorites/Issue 8

Four Favorites #8 was published in May, 1945.

## Gallery

* Page 1
* Page 2
* Page 3
* Page 4
* Page 5
* Page 6
* Page 7
* Page 8
* Page 9
* Page 10
* Page 11
* Page 12
* Page 13
* Page 14
* Page 15
* Page 16
* Page 17
* Page 18
* Page 19
* Page 20
* Page 21
* Page 22
* Page 23
* Page 24
* Page 25
* Page 26
* Page 27
* Page 28
* Page 29
* Page 30
* Page 31
* Page 32-33
* Page 34-35
* Page 36
* Page 37
* Page 38
* Page 39
* Page 40
* Page 41
* Page 42
* Page 43
* Page 44
* Page 45
* Page 46
* Page 47
* Page 48
* Page 49
* Page 50
* Page 51
* Page 52
* Page 53
* Page 54
* Page 55
* Page 56
* Page 57
* Page 58
* Page 59
* Page 60
* Page 61
* Page 62
* Page 63
* Page 64
* Page 65
* Page 66
* Page 67
* Page 68
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works published in 1945 could have had their copyright renewed in 1972 or 1973, i.e. between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st, 1974.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hindu Marriage (Amendment) Act, 1956

Layout 2
​REGISTERED No. D. 221
The Gazette of India
EXTRAORDINARY
PART II—Section I
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
No. 72] NEW DELHI, FRIDAY, DECEMBER 21, 1956
MINISTRY OF LAW
New Delhi, the 21st December, 1956
The following Act of Parliament received the assent of the President on the 20th December, 1956, and is hereby published for general information:—
THE HINDU MARRIAGE (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1956
No. 73 of 1956
[20th December, 1956]
An Act to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Be it enacted by Parliament in the Seventh Year of the Republic of India as follows:—
1. This Act may be calledShort title. the Hindu Marriage (Amendment) Act, 1956.
2. InAmendment of section 10. clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for the words "has, immediately before",25 of 1955. the words "has, for a period of not less than three years immediately preceding" shall be substituted.
K. V. K. SUNDARAM,
Secy. to the Government of India.
CORRIGENDUM
In the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 (31 of 1956), published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary, Part II, Section 1, dated the 19th June, 1956, on page 679, in clause (b) of the proviso to clause (ii) of Explanation 3 of paragraph 2 of the First Schedule, for the words "persons who are citizens of India" read "persons who are not citizens of India".
This work is the work of Government of India. Section 52(1)(q) of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957 allows for the reproduction or publication of
* any matter which has been published in any Official Gazette except an Act of a Legislature;
* any Act of a Legislature subject to the condition that such Act is reproduced or published together with any commentary thereon or any other original matter;
* the report of any committee, commission, council, board or other like body appointed by the government if such report has been laid on the Table of the Legislature, unless the reproduction or publication of such report is prohibited by the government;
* any judgement or order of a court, Tribunal or other judicial authority, unless the reproduction or publication of such judgement or order is prohibited by the court, the Tribunal or other judicial authority, as the case may be.
The decision of the Supreme Court of India in "Eastern Book Company & Ors vs D.B. Modak & Anr" on 12 December, 2007 interpreted this section of the Act as making the material public domain.
This work is also in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hindu Marriage (Amendment) Act, 1964

Layout 2
THE HINDU MARRIAGE (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1964
No. 44 of 1964
[20th December, 1964.]
An Act further to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Be it enacted by Parliament in the Fifteenth Year of the Republic of India as follows:—
1. This Act may be calledShort title. the Hindu Marriage (Amendment) Act, 1954,
2. In section 13Amendment of section 13. of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955,—
(i) in subsection (1),—
(a) the word "or" at the end of clause (vii) shall be omitted; and
(b) clauses (viii) and (ix) shall be omitted;
(ii) after sub-section (1), the following sub-section shall be inserted, namely:—
"(1A) Either party to a marriage, whether solemnized before or after the commencement of this Act, may also present a petition for the dissolution of the marriage by a decree of divorce on the ground—
(i) that there has been no resumption of cohabitation as between the parties to the marriage for a period of two years or upwards after the passing of a decree for judicial separation in a proceeding to which they were parties; or
(ii) that there has been no restitution of conjugal rights as between the parties to the marriage for a period of two years or upwards after the passing of a decree for restitution of conjugal rights in a proceeding to which they were parties.".
This work is the work of Government of India. Section 52(1)(q) of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957 allows for the reproduction or publication of
* any matter which has been published in any Official Gazette except an Act of a Legislature;
* any Act of a Legislature subject to the condition that such Act is reproduced or published together with any commentary thereon or any other original matter;
* the report of any committee, commission, council, board or other like body appointed by the government if such report has been laid on the Table of the Legislature, unless the reproduction or publication of such report is prohibited by the government;
* any judgement or order of a court, Tribunal or other judicial authority, unless the reproduction or publication of such judgement or order is prohibited by the court, the Tribunal or other judicial authority, as the case may be.
The decision of the Supreme Court of India in "Eastern Book Company & Ors vs D.B. Modak & Anr" on 12 December, 2007 interpreted this section of the Act as making the material public domain.
This work is also in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Henkel v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis, & Omaha Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
284 U.S. 444
Henkel v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis, & Omaha Railway Company
Argued: Jan. 21, 1932. --- Decided: Feb 15, 1932
Messrs. Everett Sanders, of Chicago, Ill., and Frederick M. Miner, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Henkel, administratrix.
Mr. William T. Faricy, of St. Paul, Minn., for Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Henley v. Myers

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
215 U.S. 373
Henley v. Myers
Argued: December 10, 1909. --- Decided: January 3, 1910
Messrs. W. W. Nevison, George J. Barker, A. C. Mitchell, and S. D. Bishop for plaintiffs in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 373-376 intentionally omitted]
Mr. E. E. Myers, in propria persona, and Mr. R. E. Melvin for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 376-378 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Henkel v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
237 U.S. 43
Henkel v. United States
Argued: January 20 and 21, 1915. --- Decided: April 5, 1915
Mr. Thomas J. Walsh for plaintiffs in error.
Assistant Attorney General Wallace for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Henneford v. Northern Pacific Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
303 U.S. 17
Henneford v. Northern Pacific Railway Company
Argued: Jan. 11, 1938. --- Decided: Jan 31, 1938
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Washington.
Mr. R. G. Sharpe, of Olympia, Wash., for appellants.
Messrs. M. L. Countryman, Jr., and Lorenzo B. daPonte, both of St. Paul, Minn., for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Henkels v. Sutherland

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
271 U.S. 298
Henkels v. Sutherland
Argued: May 5, 6, 1926. --- Decided: May 24, 1926
Messrs. Herbert R. Limberg, Morris J. Hirsch, Henry L. Sherman, and Harry F. Mela, all of New York City, for appellant.
Messrs. William D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., Ira Lloyd Letts, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Dean Hill Stanley, of Washington, D. C., for appellees.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse