OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 619

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 2824th meeting on 9 August 1988
The Security Council,
Recalling its resolution 598 (1987),
* Approves the report of the Secretary-General contained in document S/20093 on the implementation of operative paragraph 2 of resolutioon 598 (1987);
* Decides to set up immediately, under its authority, a United Nations Iran-Iraq Military Observer Group (UNIIMOG) and requests the Secretary-General to take the necessary steps to this effect in accordance with his above-mentioned report;
* Further decides that UNIIMOG shall be established for a period of six months, unless the Council declares otherwise;
* Requests the Secretary-General to keep the Security Council fully informed of further developments.
(Resolution S/RES/619 (1988))
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 60

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 310th meeting, on 29 October 1948 ([1])
The Security Council,
Resolves that a sub-committee be established consisting of the representatives of the United Kingdom, China, France, Belgium and the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic to consider all the amendments and revisions which have been or may be suggested to the second revised draft resolution contained in document S/1059/Rev.2, ([2]) and in consultation with the Acting Mediator to prepare a revised draft resolution.
[1] Adopted without vote. [2] See Official Records of the Security Council, Third Year, Supplement for October 1948, document S/1058.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 612

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 2812th meeting on 9 May 1988
The Security Council,
Having considered the report of 25 April 1988 (S/19823) of the Mission dispatched by the Secretary-General to investigate allegations of the use of chemical weapons in the conflict between the Islamic Republic of Iran and Iraq,
Dismayed by the Mission's conclusions that chemical weapons continue to be used in the conflict and that their use has been on an even more intensive scale than before,
* Affirms the urgent necessity of strict observance of the Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare signed at Geneva on 17 June 1925;
* Condemns vigorously the continued use of chemical weapons in the conflict between Iran and Iraq contrary to the obligations under the Geneva Protocol;
* Expects both sides to refrain from the future use of chemical weapons in accordance with their obligations under the Geneva Protocol;
* Calls upon all States to continue to apply or to establish strict control of the export to the parties to the conflict of chemical products serving for the production of chemical weapons;
* Decides to remain seized of the matter and expresses its determination to review the implementation of this resolution.
(Resolution S/RES/612 (1988))
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Muniz

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
374 U.S. 150
United States v. Muniz
Argued: April 22 and 23, 1963. --- Decided: June 17, 1963
J. William Doolittle, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
John J. Abt and Richard D. Friedman, New York City, for respondents.
Mr. Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Munday

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
222 U.S. 175
United States v. Munday
Argued: October 25, 1911. --- Decided: December 4, 1911
Solicitor General Lehmann for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Charles W. Dorr, E. C. Hughes, Hiram E. Hadley, and Wilmon Tucker for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice Lurton delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Munsey Trust Company of Washington Dc

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
332 U.S. 234
United States v. Munsey Trust Company of Washington Dc
Argued: May 6, 1947. --- Decided: June 23, 1947
[Syllabus from pages 234-236 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Philip Elman, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Messrs. W. B. Dew, of Hartford, Conn., and Alexander M. Heron, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Valperga/Volume 3/Advertisements

NEW WORKS
PUBLISHED BY G. AND W. B. WHITTAKER, AVE-MARIA LANE.
OSMOND: a Tale. By the Author of "The Favourite of Nature;" in Three Vols. 12mo. price 21s. boards.
The FAVOURITE of NATURE: a Novel. Dedicated (by permission) to Mrs. Joanna Baillie. In 3 vols. 12mo. Third Edition. Price 21s. boards.
The SPY: a Tale of the Neutral Ground: referring to some particular Occurrences during the American War; also pourtraying American Scenery and Manners. In 3 vols. 12mo. Second Edition. Price 21s. boards.
The HOUSE of RAVENSPUR: a Romance. By Mrs. Jamieson. Four vols. 12mo. Price 24s. boards.
LANGREATH: a Tale. By Mrs. Nathan. In 3 vols. 12mo. Price 21s. boards.
LEMIRA of LORRAIN: a Romance. In 3 vols. 12mo. Price 18s. boards.
LOCHIEL; or, The Field of Culloden: a Novel. In 3 vols. 12mo. Price 21s.
SUCH IS THE WORLD: a Novel. In 3 vols. 12mo. Price 21s. boards.
The VILLAGE COQUETTE: a Novel. By the Author of "Such is the World." In 3 vols. 12mo. Price 18s. boards.
A LEGEND of ARGYLE; or, 'Tis a Hundred Years Since. In 3 vols. 12mo. Price 21s. boards.
The LIFE of a BOY. By the Author of "Panorama of Youth." In 2 vols. 12mo. Price 14s. boards.
ANSTER FAIR: a Poem, in Six Cantos; with ​other Poems. By William Tennant. Fourth Edition, 12mo. Price 7s. 6d. boards.
WINTER EVENING TALES; collected among the Cottages in the South of Scotland. By James Hogg, Author of "The Queen's Wake," &c. Second Edition, 2 vols. 12mo. Price 14s. boards.
CŒUR DE LION; or, The Third Crusade: a Poem, in Sixteen Books. By Eleanor Anne Porden, Author of "The Veils," "The Arctic Expedition," and other Poems. In 2 vols. 8vo. Price 24s. boards.
The LIFE and OPINIONS of SIR RICHARD MALTRAVERS, an English Gentleman of the Seventeenth Century. In 2 vols. post 8vo. Price 16s. boards.
The WONDERS of the VEGETABLE KINGDOM DISPLAYED: in a Series of Letters. By the Author of "Select Female Biography." With a Plate and Woodcuts. Price 7s. boards.
A CONCISE and PRACTICAL TREATISE on the GROWTH and CULTURE of the Carnation, Pink, Auricula, Polyanthus, Ranunculus, Tulip, Hyacinth, Rose, and other Flowers; including a Dissertation on Soils and Manures, and containing Catalogues of the finest and most esteemed Varieties of each Flower. Second Edition, with Additions. By Thomas Hogg, Florist, Paddington Green, Middlesex. In 12mo, with coloured Plates. Price 8s. boards.
A CONCISE HISTORY of ANCIENT INSTITUTIONS, INVENTIONS and DISCOVERIES, in Science and Mechanic Art. Abridged and Translated from the Beytrage zur Geschichte der Erfindungen of Professor Beckman of the University of Gottingen. With various important Additions. In 2 vols. 12mo. 15s.
The SCRINIUM: a Collection of Tales founded on Facts. By Rebecca Edridge. In 2 vols. 12mo. Price 15s. boards.
TAKINGS; or, the Life of a Collegian. Illustrated by Twenty-six Etchings, from Designs, by R. Dagley. In royal 8vo. Price 21s. boards.
# Valperga/Volume 3

VALPERGA:
OR, THE
LIFE AND ADVENTURES
OF
CASTRUCCIO,
PRINCE OF LUCCA.
BY THE AUTHOR OF "FRANKENSTEIN."
IN THREE VOLUMES. VOL. III.
LONDON:
PRINTED FOR G. AND W. B. WHITTAKER, AVE-MARIA-LANE.
1823.
page
PRINTED BY RICHARD TAYLOR, SHOE-LANE, LONDON.
* Chapter I (XXVII)
* Chapter II (XXVIII)
* Chapter III (XXIX)
* Chapter IV (XXX)
* Chapter V (XXXI)
* Chapter VI (XXXII)
* Chapter VII (XXXIII)
* Chapter VIII (XXXIV)
* Chapter IX (XXXV)
* Chapter X (XXXVI)
* Chapter XI (XXXVII)
* Chapter XII (XXXVII)
* Conclusion
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Treaty Series/Volume 1/1/2

No. 2
NETHERLANDS
I declare that the Netherlands Government recognizes as compulsory ipso facto and without special agreement, in relation to any other Member of the United Nations and any other State accepting the same obligation, that is to say, on condition of reciprocity, the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice in conformity with Article 36, paragraph 2, of the Statute of the Court, for a period of ten years as from 6 August 1946 and thereafter until notification of abrogation is made, on any future disputes, except those in regard to which the parties would have agreed, after the coming into force of the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice, to have recourse to another method of pacific settlement.
New York, 5 August 1946
(Signed) E. N. van Kleffens
# United Nations Treaty Series/Volume 1/1/1

No. 1
UNITED KINGDOM
Declaration recognizing as compulsory the jurisdiction of the Court, in conformity with Article 36, paragraph 2, of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, in all legal disputes concerning the interpretation, application, or validity of any treaty relating to the boundaries of British Honduras. London, 13 February 1946
English official text communicated by His Majesty’s Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs in Great Britain. The registration ex officio by the Secretariat of the United Nations took place on 14 December 1946.
I, Ernest Bevin, His Majesty’s Principal Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, declare on behalf of His Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom in accordance with paragraph 2 of Article 36 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice that for a period of five years from the date of this declaration they accept as compulsory ipso facto and without special agreement, in relation to any other State accepting the same obligation, the jurisdiction of the Court in all legal disputes concerning the interpretation, application, or validity of any treaty relating to the boundaries of British Honduras, and over any questions arising ​out of any conclusion which the Court may reach with regard to such treaty.
Given under my hand and seal, at the Foreign Office, London, this Thirteenth day of February, One Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-six.
(Signed) Ernest Bevin
# United Nations Treaty Series/Volume 1/1/10

No. 10
DENMARK
French official text communicated by the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Denmark. The registration ex officio by the Secretariat of the United Nations took place on 14 December 1946.
In accordance with Article 36, paragraph 2 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, Denmark recognizes as compulsory, in relation to any other State accepting the same obligation, the jurisdiction of the Court, for a period of ten years from the deposit of this declaration with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
New York, 10 December 1946
(Signed) Gustav Rasmussen Minister for Foreign Affairs of Denmark
# United Nations Treaty Series/Volume 1/1/12

No. 12
GUATEMALA
The Government of Guatemala declares that in accordance with Article 36 (2) and (3) of the Statue of the International Court of Justice, it recognizes as compulsory, ipso facto and without special agreement, ​in relation to any other State accepting the same obligation, and for a period of five years, the jurisdiction of the Court in all legal disputes. This declaration does not cover the dispute between England and Guatemala concerning the restoration of the territory of Belize, which the Government of Guatemala would, as it has proposed, agree to submit to the judgment of the Court, if the case were decided ex aequo et bono, in accordance with Article 38 (2) of the said Statute.
Guatemala, 27 January 1947
(Signed) E. Silva
# United Nations Treaty Series/Volume 1

Treaty Series
Treaties and international agreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations
VOLUME 1
Recueil des Traités
Traités et accords internationaux enregistrés ou classés et inscrits au répertoire au Secrétariat de l'Organisation des Nations Unies
Treaties and international agreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations
VOLUME I
1946 - 1947
II.I. Nos. 1-15 II. Nos. 1-11
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I
Treaties and international agreements registered from 14 December 1946 to 31 March 1947

## No. 15. Yugoslavia and Albania

II
Treaties and international agreements filed and recorded from 14 December 1946 to 31 March 1947

## No. 11. United Nations and United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization

ANNEX A. Ratifications, accessions, etc., to treaties and international agreements registered with the Secretariat of the United Nations.

## No. 4. Convention on the privileges and immunities of the United Nations, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 13 February 1946

ANNEX C. Ratifications, accessions, etc., to treaties and international agreements registered with the Secretariat of the League of Nations.
# United Nations Treaty Series/Volume 1/1

I
Treaties and international agreements
registered from 14 December 1946 to 31 March 1947 Nos. 1 to 15
# United Nations Treaty Series/Volume 1/1/11

No. 11
SIAM
Instrument of adherence to the United Nations. 16 December 1946
​No. 11. INSTRUMENT OF ADHERENCE BY SIAM TO THE UNITED NATIONS
16 December 1946
The Government of the Kingdom of Siam having received from the Secretary-General of the United Nations the information that the General Assembly of the United Nations has approved the application for membership of Siam hereby presents to the Secretary-General of the United Nations this instrument of adherence, in accordance with rule 116 of the provisional rules of procedure for the General Assembly.
The Government of the Kingdom of Siam hereby states that it accepts the obligations contained in the Charter of the United Nations.
(Signed) Wan Waithayakon
# Davis v. Gaines

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
104 U.S. 386
Davis v. Gaines
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana.
The facts are stated fully in the opinion of the court.
Mr. J. D. Rouse for the appellant.
Mr. John S. Whitaker, contra.
MR. JUSTICE WOODS delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Davis v. Geissler

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
162 U.S. 290
Davis v. Geissler
D. P. Stubbs, for plaintiffs in error.
E. A. McMath, for defendants in error.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Davis v. Gray/Dissent Davis

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Davis
United States Supreme Court
83 U.S. 203
Davis v. Gray
Mr. Justice DAVIS, with whom concurred the CHIEF JUSTICE, dissenting, said:
I am constrained to enter my dissent to the opinion and judgment of the court in this case, for the reason that this suit, although in form otherwise, is in effect against the State of Texas. The object which it seeks to obtain shows this to be so, which is to deprive the State of the power to dispose, in its own way, of its public lands, and this object, by the decision just rendered, is accomplished. In my judgment the bill should have been dismissed, because the State is exempt from suit at the instance of private persons, and on the face of the bill it is apparent that the State is arraigned as a defendant.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Davis v. Geissler/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
162 U.S. 290
Davis v. Geissler
This was an action brought by plaintiffs in error, citizens of the state of Illinois, against more than 30 defendants, alleged to be citizens of the state of Kansas, in the circuit court of the United States for the district f Kansas. The petition averred the execution by defendants of a certain contract, annexed, for the payment to plaintiffs of $5,000 for the construction, erection, and putting in operation of a creamery at or near Oakley, Kan., the contract being signed by defendants in the form of subscriptions to stock; performance by plaintiffs; and that they had received on account the sum of $100,-and demanded judgment against defendants, jointly and severally, for $4,900 and interest. Some of the defendants did not appear, but defendants in error did, and pleaded a modified general denial, and 12 other defenses, setting up fraud in respect of the contract, nonperformance, want of jurisdiction, in that one of the defendants, B. Mahanna, was a co-citizen of Illinois with plaintiffs, and that Mahanna's subscription to the contract was really a subscription by plaintiffs, made by him as their agent. Defendants claimed that the contract was several and not joint, and that each was bound only for the amount of his own subscription, which in no instance exceeded $850. The case was tried by a jury, but, after the evidence was closed, the court declined to submit it, and entered an order, November 28, 1891, that, 'it appearing to the court that this court has not jurisdiction of the subject-matter of this action, it is ordered that this case be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, at the costs of plaintiffs.' To review this judgment the pending writ of error was sued out October 13, 1892.
The circuit court made no certificate of the question of its jurisdiction to this court, and the case comes within Maynard v. Hecht, 151 U.S. 324, 14 Sup. Ct. 353; Colvin v. Jacksonville, 157 U.S. 368, 15 Sup. Ct. 634; Van Wagenen v. Sewall, 160 U.S. 369, 16 Sup. Ct. 370; Chappell v. U.S., 160 U.S. 499, 507, 16 Sup. Ct. 397.
Writ of error dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Davis v. George B Newton Coal Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
267 U.S. 292
Davis v. George B Newton Coal Company
Argued: Jan. 12, 1925. --- Decided: March 2, 1925
Mr. Wm. Clarke Mason, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 293-296 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Allen S. Olmsted, 2d, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Lee Yen Tai

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
185 U.S. 213
United States v. Lee Yen Tai
Argued: March 13, 14, 1902. --- Decided: April 21, 1902
Assistant Attorney General Hoyt for appellant.
Messrs. Max J. Kohler and B. Lewinson for appellee.
Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Lee Kaufman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Gray
United States Supreme Court
106 U.S. 196
United States v. Lee Kaufman
Solicitor General Phillips and W. Willoughby, for plaintiff in error.
S. F. Beach, Leigh R. Paige, Wm. J. Robertson, Francis L. Smith, and W. D. Shipman, for defendant in error.
MILLER, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company (220 U.S. 257)
* United States v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company (254 U.S. 255)
See also Lehigh Valley Railroad Company v. United States.