OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Sarno v. Illinois Crime Commission/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
[p482] PER CURIAM.
Petitioners were ordered to testify before the Illinois Crime Investigating Commission under a grant of immunity conferred pursuant to Ill. Rev. Stat., c. 38, § 203-14 (1969). The occasion for granting the writ in this case was to consider whether Illinois must demonstrate to petitioners, prior to an adjudication for contempt for refusal to answer the Commission's questions, that immunity as broad in scope as the protection of the privilege against self-incrimination is available and applicable to them. 401 U.S. 935 (1971). The writ was granted in light of petitioners' claim that the statute did not provide complete transactional immunity. On the same day that the writ was granted, probable jurisdiction was noted in Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of Investigation, 401 U.S. 933 (1971), to resolve the [p483] question whether a State can compel testimony from an unwilling witness, who invokes the privilege against self-incrimination, by granting immunity from use and derivative use of the compelled testimony, or whether transactional immunity is required.
We held today in Kastigar v. United States, ante, p. 441, and in Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of Investigation, ante, p. 472, that testimony may be compelled from an unwilling witness over a claim of the privilege against self-incrimination by a grant of use and derivative use immunity. The premise of petitioners' arguments is that transactional immunity is required. They say that Illinois failed to demonstrate satisfactorily that transactional immunity was provided, but they do not contend that the Illinois immunity statute affords protection less comprehensive than use and derivative use immunity. Respondent asserts that the statute affords complete transactional immunity, reflecting a long-standing Illinois policy of providing immunity greater than that required by the United States Constitution. Since neither party contends that the scope of the immunity provided by the Illinois statute falls below the constitutional requirement set forth in Kastigar, we conclude that any uncertainty regarding the scope of protection in excess of the constitutional requirement should best be left to the courts of Illinois. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.
MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN and MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Kastigar v. United States, ante, p. 462.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Kastigar v. United States, ante, p. 467.
# Regalado v. California/Concurrence Harlan

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Harlan
United States Supreme Court
374 U.S. 497
Regalado v. California
Mr. Justice HARLAN concurs in the result.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Regal Knitwear Company v. National Labor Relations Board

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
324 U.S. 9
Regal Knitwear Company v. National Labor Relations Board
Argued: and Submitted Dec. 8, 1944. --- Decided: Jan 29, 1945
Mr. John P. Chandler, of New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Malcolm F. Halliday, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Regalado v. California

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
374 U.S. 497
Regalado v. California
Adolfo Gusman Regalado, pro se.
Stanley Mosk, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and S.C.lark Moore, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondents.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of California.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Regan v. New York

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Frankfurter

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
349 U.S. 58
Regan v. New York
Argued: Nov. 18, 1954. --- Decided: April 25, 1955
Mr. Emanuel Redfield, New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Aaron E. Koota, New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Regarding Construction of American Pipelines

Memorandum published January 24, 2017, at Whitehouse.gov. Memorandum filed on January 27, 2017, at 8:45 A.M. and published in the Federal Register on January 30, 2017. Scan at File:Presidential Memorandum Regarding Construction of American Pipelines.pdf.
Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2017
Presidential Memorandum Regarding Construction of American Pipelines
January 24, 2017
By the President of the United States of America
A Memorandum
Memorandum for the Secretary of Commerce
The Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with all relevant executive departments and agencies, shall develop a plan under which all new pipelines, as well as retrofitted, repaired, or expanded pipelines, inside the borders of the United States, including portions of pipelines, use materials and equipment produced in the United States, to the maximum extent possible and to the extent permitted by law. The Secretary shall submit the plan to the President within 180 days of the date of this memorandum.
“Produced in the United States” shall mean:
    (i) With regard to iron or steel products, that all manufacturing processes for such iron or steel products, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States.
    (ii) Steel or iron material or products manufactured abroad from semi-finished steel or iron from the United States are not “produced in the United States” for purposes of this memorandum.
    (iii) Steel or iron material or products manufactured in the United States from semi-finished steel or iron of foreign origin are not “produced in the United States” for purposes of this memorandum.
The Secretary of Commerce is hereby authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
    Donald J. Trump
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Regalado v. California/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Harlan
United States Supreme Court
374 U.S. 497
Regalado v. California
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23, 83 S.Ct. 1623 and McDonald v. United States, 335 U.S. 451, 69 S.Ct. 191, 93 L.Ed. 153.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Book Introduction - Obadiah

Read first chapter of Obadiah Internal evidence seems to fix the date of Obadiah's ministry in the reign of the bloody Athaliah 2 Kings 8:16-26. If this be true, and if the ministry of Joel was during the reign of Joash, then Obadiah is chronologically first of the writing prophets, and first to use the formula, "the day of the Lord." (Cf.) (See Scofield "Joel 1:4"). The book is in four parts:
* Edom's humiliation, vs. 1-9.
* The crowning sin of Edom, vs. 10-14.
* The future visitation of Edom in the day of the Lord, vs. Ob1:15,16, (Isa 34.). Isa63:1-6.
* The inclusion of Edom in the future kingdom, Ob1:17-21; Nu24:17-19.

## Verse 8

Edom (See Scofield "Genesis 36:1").

## Verse 21

kingdom See Kingdom, (See Scofield "Zechariah 12:8") See Scofield "1 Corinthians 15:24"
# Book Introduction - Philemon

SCOFIELD REFERENCE NOTES (Old Scofield 1917 Edition) Read first chapter of Philemon The Epistle of Paul the Apostle to Philemon WRITER: The Apostle Paul ( 1:1) DATE: Probably A.D. 64. It is one of the Prison Epistles. See Introductions to Ephesians and Colossians. THEME: Onesimus ("profitable"), a slave of Philemon, a Christian of Colosse, had robbed his master and fled to Rome. There he became a convert through Paul, who sent him back to Philemon with this letter. It is of priceless value as a teaching
* (1) in practical righteousness;
* (2) in Christian brotherhood;
* (3) in Christian courtesy;
* (4) in the law of love.
The divisions are four I. Greeting 1-3. II. The character of Philemon, 4-7. III. Intercession for Onesimus, 8-21. IV. Salutations and conclusion, 22-25.

# CHAPTER 1
## Verse 18

account Philemon 1:17,18 perfectly illustrate imputation: "Receive him as myself"--reckon to him my merit; "If he hath wronged thee or oweth thee ought, put that on mine account"-- reckon to me his demerit. See "Imputation," Leviticus 25:50. (See Scofield "James 2:23").
# Book Introduction - Nahum

Read first chapter of Nahum Nahum prophesied during the reign of Hezekiah, probably about one hundred and fifty years after Jonah. He has but one subject--the destruction of Nineveh. According to Diodorus Siculus, the city was destroyed nearly a century later, precisely as here predicted. The prophecy is one continuous strain which does not yield to analysis. The moral theme is: the holiness of Jehovah which must deal with sin in judgment.

# CHAPTER 1
## Verse 1

Nineveh Nineveh stands in Scripture as the representative of apostate religious Gentiledom, as Babylon represents the confusion into which the Gentile political world-system has fallen Daniel 2:41-43, (See Scofield "Isaiah 13:1") , Under the preaching of Jonah, B.C. 862, the city and king had turned to God (Elohim), Jonah 3:3-10 But in the time of Nahum, more than a century later, the city had wholly apostatized from God. It is this which distinguishes Nineveh from all the other ancient Gentile cities, and which makes her the suited symbol of the present religious Gentile world-system in the last day. Morally, Nineveh is described in Romans 1:21-23. The chief deity of apostate Nineveh was the bull-god, with the face of a man and the wings of a bird: "an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and four-footed beasts." The message of Nahum, uttered about one hundred years before the destruction of Nineveh, is, therefore, not a call to repentance, but an unrelieved warning of judgment: "He will make an utter end: affliction shall not rise up the second time." Nahum 1:9; see, also, Nahum 3:10. For there is no remedy for apostasy but utter judgment, and a new beginning. Cf. ; Isaiah 1:4,5,24-28; Hebrews 6:4-8; Proverbs 29:1. It is the way of God; apostasy is punished by catastrophic destruction. Of this the flood and the destruction of Nineveh are witnesses. The coming destruction of apostate Christendom is foreshadowed by these. (Cf) Daniel 2:34,35; Luke 17:26,27; Revelation 19:17-21. burden See note 1, (See Scofield "Isaiah 13:1")

## Verse 2

God is jealous The great ethical lesson of Nahum is that the character of God makes Him not only "slow to anger," and "a stronghold to them that trust Him," but also one who "will not at all acquit the wicked." He can be "just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus" Romans 3:26 but only because His holy law has been vindicated in the cross.

## Verse 7

he knoweth them that trust Psalms 1:6; 2 Timothy 2:19 (See Scofield "Psalms 2:12").

## Verse 7

Nineveh (See Scofield "Nahum 1:1")

## Verse 8

No, Or, No-Amon. Jeremiah 46:25; Ezekiel 30:15,16
# Sermons from the Latins/Preface

PREFACE.
In perusing these pages, it will be well to make and to bear in mind a distinction between the manner and the matter of the work. The manner, such as it is, belongs to the author, but, on the other hand, little or no attempt has been made at originality in doctrine or thought. In the seminary it was much insisted on that every priest, and more especially every young priest, should have continually beside him some suitable means wherewith to occupy his spare time. Accordingly, the study and the adaptation of that most excellent work the " Conciones Sacrae " of Cardinal Bellarmin, S.J., have been found in this instance a very pleasant and a very profitable employment. The first design was to translate the sermons verbatim, but, both on account of their extreme diffuseness and because, as originally written, they do not constitute a complete course for the year, that idea proved impracticable. From a study of the work as a whole, therefore, and out of the resulting mass of matter, a sermon for each ​Sunday, and for a few of the principal festivals of the year has been evolved. Some extraneous thoughts, encountered in a course of desultory reading and drawn chiefly from Fr. Segneri, S.J., and Padre Agostino da Montefeltro, have been pressed into service to supplement the Cardinal's homilies. These latter have helped the present writer so often and so much in the routine of parish work that it is most earnestly hoped they may prove of assistance to others, and that this or any similar attempt, however humble, to bring out into the light these and the many other gems of Catholic thought and sentiment may meet with popular approval.
St. James' Church,
Boston, Mass.
# Sermons from the Latins

SERMONS FROM THE LATINS.
ADAPTED FROM BELLARMIN, SEGNERI,
AND OTHER SOURCES
BY
Rev. JAMES J. BAXTER, D.D.
New York, Cincinnati, Chicago:
BENZIGER BROTHERS,
Printers to the Holy Apostolic See.
1902.
page
​Nihil Obstat.
JOHN T. MULLEN, D.C.L.,
Censor Deputatus.
Imprimatur.
✠ JNO. M. FARLEY,
Administrator of New York.
New York, July 14, 1902.
Copyright, 1902, by Benziger Brothers.
page
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ADVENT.
EPIPHANY.
LENT.
# Remarks recorded by Barack Obama for the Hall of Presidents at Magic Kingdom Park, Walt Disney World, Florida

Recorded at the White House by Walt Disney Company Imagineers at a meeting with the President on March 4, 2009. These lines were heard in the version of the show that ran from July 4, 2009 to January 17, 2017.
The American dream is as old as our founding, but as timeless as our hopes. It is reborn every day in the heart of every child who wakes up in a land of limitless possibilities, in a country where "we, the people" means all the people. We may come from different places and believe different things, but what makes us American is a shared spirit; a spirit of courage and determination; of kindness and generosity. It is a spirit grounded in the wisdom of the generations that have gone before us, but open to the unimagined discoveries and possibilities on the horizon that lies ahead. Let us enjoy it, cherish it, defend it, and pass it on to our children as the bright and beautiful blessing it is: this enduring American dream.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Remarks on the Ilwu May Day Protest of the Iraq War

Source: 2008 Congressional Record, Vol. 154, Page E787{{{3}}}
Remarks on the Ilwu May Day Protest of the Iraq War
HON. JACKIE SPEIER
OF CALIFORNIA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Tuesday, May 1, 2008
Ms. SPEIER. Madam Speaker, today many of the 40,000 members of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union--the ILWU--are expressing their outrage at the Administration's war policies and their effect on working families by staging a walkout at ports and other facilities along the West Coast.
I stand in solidarity with these workers whom, like the truckers who mobilized in Washington earlier this week and many other working and middle-class Americans, have simply had enough of the diet of mistruths and deceptions that our President continues to feed the American public.
Madam Speaker, Americans are saying enough is enough. We spend billions every week in Iraq while the government there banks its oil profits and refuses to pitch in to help fund the necessary projects required to get the Iraqi people back on their feet.
Madam Speaker, my tenure in this house is short, but my interest in the institution has been a life-long pursuit. May I say that you have done more to bring peace to our nation and get our troops back home to their families than any other war-time Speaker in our history. I am proud to stand by you and the ILWU as we all do our part to bring an end to this war.
It is time to bring our men and women home to their families and communities. It is time for all Americans, like the Longshore and Warehouse workers, to stand up and tell the President "Enough is enough. End this war before your term is over. Eight tragic years for our country is bad enough, don't saddle future generations with a prolonged commitment in a country we never should have gone into in the first place."
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Remarks on the Observance of the 93rd Anniversary of the Armenian Genocide

Source: 2008 Congressional Record, Vol. 154, Page E710{{{3}}}
Remarks on the Observance of the 93rd Anniversary of the Armenian Genocide
HON. JACKIE SPEIER
OF CALIFORNIA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Tuesday, April 23, 2008
Ms. SPEIER. Madam Speaker, today, as we observe the 93rd Anniversary of the Armenian Genocide, I stand with the millions around the world who have called for greater recognition of this atrocious event in world history.
Madam Speaker, my mother, now 92 years old and still working outside the home, is a first generation Armenian-American who lost much of her family in the atrocities of 1915. She and many of my Armenian brothers and sisters have long waited for validation from our country and the international community of simply acknowledging the events that took place and were well documented at the time. Growing up, I heard stories about our relatives who were lost. As I got older, I read the telegram sent by our Ambassador Henry Morgenthau to the Secretary of State on July 16, 1915:
"Deportation of and excesses against peaceful Armenians is increasing and from harrowing reports of eye witnesses it appears that a campaign of race extermination is in progress under a pretext of reprisal against rebellion."
We are told by some to forget the Armenian Genocide, to get over it. But to forget any incident like this is tantamount to allowing it to happen again.
The facts before us are not in dispute. The reason we still debate this is not to determine if a genocide took place but rather, to determine if we have the political backbone to stand up for the truth.
Madam Speaker, the Members of this House disagree on many things in the course of our work. But it is the things we agree on that bind us together. Freedom. Democracy. Opportunity. And the repudiation of any act of genocide, ethnic cleansing or subjugation.
We condemn the Nazi concentration camps, the Soviet gulags, the Khmer Rouge's killing fields and the current and lasting tragedy in Darfur. We wouldn't think of excusing or ignoring any of these. To do so would be unconscionable. Why then, do we allow our nation's official reaction to the Armenian genocide to be little more than a shrug?
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Remarks on the structure and affinities of Cephalotus

"Remarks on the structure and affinities of Cephalotus" is an 1832 paper written by Robert Brown on the biology of Cephalotus, the monotypic genus of carnivorous plants endemic to south-western Australia.
* "Remarks on the structure and affinities of Cephalotus" in London and Edinburgh philosophical magazine and journal of science 1 (1832):314–317.
* "Remarks on the structure and affinities of Cephalotus" in Bennett, John Joseph (ed.) (1866) The miscellaneous botanical works of Robert Brown, Esq., D.C.L., F.R.S. 2:353–359.
# Sense and Sensibility

the first of Austen's novels to be published, under the pseudonym "A Lady." Spoken version at Sense and Sensibility in librivox.org
SENSE
AND
SENSIBILITY:
A NOVEL.
IN THREE VOLUMES.
BY A LADY.
VOL. I.
London: PRINTED FOR THE AUTHOR, By C. Roworth, Bell-yard, Temple-bar, AND PUBLISHED BY T. EGERTON, WHITEHALL.
1811.
* Chapter 1
* Chapter 2
* Chapter 3
* Chapter 4
* Chapter 5
* Chapter 6
* Chapter 7
* Chapter 8
* Chapter 9
* Chapter 10
* Chapter 11
* Chapter 12
* Chapter 13
* Chapter 14
* Chapter 15
* Chapter 16
* Chapter 17
* Chapter 18
* Chapter 19
* Chapter 20
* Chapter 21
* Chapter 22
* Chapter 23
* Chapter 24
* Chapter 25
* Chapter 26
* Chapter 27
* Chapter 28
* Chapter 29
* Chapter 30
* Chapter 31
* Chapter 32
* Chapter 33
* Chapter 34
* Chapter 35
* Chapter 36
* Chapter 37
* Chapter 38
* Chapter 39
* Chapter 40
* Chapter 41
* Chapter 42
* Chapter 43
* Chapter 44
* Chapter 45
* Chapter 46
* Chapter 47
* Chapter 48
* Chapter 49
* Chapter 50
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Smith v. Orton

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
62 U.S. 241
Smith v. Orton
THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the district of Wisconsin.
It was before this court at a prior term, and is reported in 18 Howard, 263. It is proper to remark that the bill, in this case, set forth that the controversy in the State court, which was referred to in 18 Howard, had become terminated.
The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
It was argued by Mr. Doolittle for the appellant, upon which side there was also a brief by Mr. Brown, and by Mr. Gillet for the appellee, upon which side there was also a brief by Mr. Mariner.
Mr. Justice CATRON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Smith v. Payne

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
194 U.S. 104
Smith v. Payne
Argued: March 11, 1904. ---
Messrs. Tracy L. Jeffords, Charles F. Moody, and E. Van Buren Getty for appellants.
Messrs. Henry H. Glassie and John G. Johnson for appellee.
Statement by Mr. Justice Brown:
This was also a bill, filed by the firm of Street & Smith, to enjoin the Postmaster General from canceling certain certificates of entry admitting the publications of complainant firm to the mail as second-class mail matter. This case took the same course as the preceding one.
Mr. Justice Brown delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse