OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/22nd Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 66

Chap. LXVI.—An Act to improve the navigation of the Potomac river between Georgetown and Alexandria, and for other purposes.
Appropriation to citizens of Georgetown to improve navigation of Potomac, &c.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in order to aid the citizens of Georgetown in removing the obstruction to their navigation, by causing the cut already made through the bar, below the town, to be enlarged and deepened; and for the further purpose of enabling them to make a free turnpike road to the district line on the Virginia side of the river, and to purchase of the present proprietors, and make for ever free, the bridge over the Little Falls of Potomac river, the sum of one hundred and fifty thousand dollars be, and the same is hereby, appropriated, to be paid out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated.
How to be paid.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the said sum shall be paid, from time to time, by the Secretary of the Treasury, to the order of the corporation of Georgetown, in such sums as to enable the said corporation to effect the purposes aforesaid.
Condition.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That before the said sum be paid over to the said corporation, it shall pass an ordinance to make said road and bridge free, and to be kept in repair by said corporation for ever.
Approved, March 2, 1833.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/22nd Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 70

Chap. LXX.—An Act making appropriation for the public buildings, and for other purposes.
Appropriation for penitentiary.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That for the purpose of completing the buildings of the penitentiary, its support, the purchase of raw materials to be manufactured by the convicts, and as compensation to Thomas Carberry, who is hereby allowed one thousand dollars for his services in planning and superintending the erection of the penitentiary, the sum of fifteen thousand four hundred and thirty-six dollars is hereby appropriated, to be paid out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Appropriations for Capitol, President’s house, &c.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the following sums be, and hereby are appropriated, to be paid out of any money in the treasury, not otherwise appropriated, for the following purposes, that is to say:
For dressing and laying the stone, procured for paving the terrace of the Capitol, seven thousand dollars.
For enclosing and improving the public ground north of the Capitol, two thousand dollars.
For improving the Capitol square, including the gardener’s salary, and lighting the lamps, two thousand seven hundred and fifty dollars.
For completing the regulation of the ground and planting, south of the President’s house, four thousand six hundred and sixty dollars.
For alterations and repairs in the Capitol, one thousand dollars.
For alterations and repairs in the President’s house, five hundred dollars.
For constructing reservoirs and fountains at the public offices, and President’s house, and enclosing and planting the fountain square, six thousand seven hundred and twenty-three dollars.
For keeping in repair the fire engines belonging to the public buildings, two hundred dollars.
For furnishing the President’s house, to be expended under the direction of the President, in addition to the proceeds of such decayed furniture, as he may direct to be sold, twenty thousand dollars.
For an additional pavement for the statue of Washington, five thousand dollars.
For alterations in the Representatives Hall, to accommodate the twenty-third Congress, according to a plan recommended by a select committee of the House of Representatives, of thirtieth June, eighteen hundred and thirty-two, thirteen thousand dollars.
For completing the public vault, and railing thereon, one thousand six hundred dollars.
Approved, March 2, 1833.
# United States v. Wurts

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
303 U.S. 414
United States v. Wurts
Argued: Feb. 28, 1938. --- Decided: March 14, 1938
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Arnold Raum, of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
Mr. Claude C. Smith, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Wurzbach

United States Supreme Court
280 U.S. 396
United States v. Wurzbach
Argued: Jan. 20, 1930. --- Decided: Feb 24, 1930
The Attorney General and Mr. Richardson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.
Mr. Hugh R. Robertson, of San Antonio, Tex., for appellee.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Wyoming

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
331 U.S. 440
United States v. Wyoming
Argued: April 7, 1947. --- Decided: June 2, 1947
Rehearing Denied Oct. 13, 1947. See 68 S.Ct. 37.
Mr. Marvin J. Sonosky, of Washington, D.C., for complainant.
Messrs. Donald R. Richberg, of Washington, D.C., and C. R. Ellery, of Cheyenne, Wyo., for defendants.
Mr. Chief Justice VINSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Wyckoff Pipe & Creosoting Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
271 U.S. 263
United States v. Wyckoff Pipe & Creosoting Company
Argued: April 29, 1926. --- Decided: May 24, 1926
Messrs. William J. Donovan, and Herman J. Galloway, Asst. Attys. Gen., and Edward D. Hays, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.
Mr. Harvey D. Jacob, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Union Supply Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
215 U.S. 50
United States v. Union Supply Company
Argued: October 13, 14, 1909. --- Decided: November 8, 1909
Solicitor General Bowers for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 51 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Isaac R. Hitt, Jr., for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 52 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Union Pacific Railway Company (165 U.S. 482)

United States Supreme Court
165 U.S. 482
United States v. Union Pacific Railway Company
Mr. Justice BREWER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Union Pacific Railway Company (165 U.S. 482)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
165 U.S. 482
United States v. Union Pacific Railway Company
The facts in these cases are different from the facts in the case just decided. U.S. v. Winona & St. P. R. Co., 17 Sup. Ct. 368. But the principles announced in the foregoing opinion are conclusive of the rights of the parties herein, and so, without any statement in detail of the facts, and for the reasons given in that opinion, the decrees in these cases will be affirmed.
Sol. Gen. Conrad, for the United States.
Thomas Wilson, for appellees St. Paul & S.C.. R. Co. et al.
John F. Dillon, for appellees Union Pac. Ry. Co. et al.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Union Stock Yard & Transit Company of Chicago No 621 Chicago Junction Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
226 U.S. 286
United States v. Union Stock Yard & Transit Company of Chicago No 621 Chicago Junction Railway Company
Argued: October 24, 1912. --- Decided: December 9, 1912
Assistant Attorney General Adkins and Mr. William E. Lamb, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, for appellant in No. 621, and appellee in No. 622.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 287-290 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Ralph M. Shaw for appellees other than Louis Pfaelzer & Sons, in No. 621, and appellant in No. 622.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 290-293 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Willard M. McEwen and Joseph Weissenbach for Louis Pfaelzer & Sons, appellee in No. 621.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 293-295 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. United Engineering & Constructing Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
234 U.S. 236
United States v. United Engineering & Constructing Company
Argued: May 8, 1914. --- Decided: June 8, 1914
Assistant Attorney General Thompson and Mr. P. M. Ashford for appellant.
Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney, John S. Flannery, and William Hitz for appellee.
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 (1951), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that a court will defer to a federal agency's findings of fact if supported by "substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole." Universal Camera added an additional qualification to the substantial evidence test laid down in Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB. The evidence supporting the agency's conclusion must be substantial in consideration of the record as a whole, even including the evidence that is not consistent with the agency's conclusion. Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
340 U.S. 474
Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
Argued: Nov. 6, 7, 1950. --- Decided: Feb 26, 1951
[Syllabus from pages 474-475 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, pro hac vice by special leave of Court, for petitioner.
Mr. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Universal Battery Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
281 U.S. 580
Universal Battery Company v. United States
Argued: Jan. 21, 1930. --- Decided: May 26, 1930
Mr. George Maurice Morris, of Washington, D. C., for petitioners in cases Nos. 127 and 275.
Mr. George M. Wilmeth, of Washington, D. C., for petitioners in cases Nos. 350, 351, and 352.
The Attorney General and Mr. Claude R. Branch, of Providence, R. I., for the United States.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Uther and Igraine/Book 4/9

IX
WITHOUT the gate of Tintagel stood Uther the King, looking out towards the eastern hills clear against the calm of the sky. He stood bare-headed, like one in prayer; his face was strong, yet wistful and patient as a sick child's. At his elbow waited Merlin, silent and inscrutable. Much had passed between them in that upper room, that room more hallowed to Uther than the rock tomb of the Christ.
"Ever, ever night," he said, stretching out his hands as to an eternal void.
Merlin's eyes seemed to look leagues away over moor, hill, and valley. A strange tenderness played upon his lips, and there was a radiance upon his face impossible to describe. It was like the face of a lover, a dreamer of dreams.
"A man is a mystery to himself," he said.
"But to God? "
"I know no God, save the god my own soul. Let me live and die, nothing more. Why curse one's life with a 'to be'? "
Uther sighed heavily.
"It is a kind of fate to me," he said, "inevitable as the setting of the sun, natural as sleep. Not for myself do I fear it."
"Let Jehovah follow Jupiter into the chaos of fable. Sire, look yonder."
Merlin's eyes had caught life on the distant hillsides, life surging from the valleys, life, and the glory of it. Harness, helm, and shield shone in the sun. Gold, azure, silver, scarlet, were creeping from the bronzed green of the wilds. Silent and solemn the host rolled gradual into the full splendour of the day.
Uther's eyes beheld them through a mist of tears.
"King Nentres, King Urience, and the host," he said.
"Even so, sire."
"They were bidden to follow."
"Loyal to their king."
Uther watched them with a great pride stealing into his eyes; he smiled and held his head high.
"All these are mine," he said.
Merlin's face had kindled.
"Grapple the days to come," he said; "let Scripture and old ethics rot. You have a thousand knights; let them ride by stream and forest, moor and mere. Let them ride out and sunder like the wind."
"The quest of a King's heart!"
"Sire, like a golden dawn shall she rise out of the past. Blow thy horn. Let us not tarry."
# United States v. Gunnison

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
155 U.S. 389
United States v. Gunnison
The appellee sued in the court below to recover certain fees and clerk hire which he claimed to be due for services rendered as shipping commissioner at the port of Mobile from June 18, 1889, to February, 1890. The claim was for $1,607 and costs. There was judgment below in his favor for $75, being $25 a month for clerk hire during the months of December, 1889, and January and February, 1890. From this judgment the United States appealed.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Dodge, for the United States.
George A. King, for appellee.
Mr. Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Guthrie

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    McLean
United States Supreme Court
58 U.S. 284
United States v. Guthrie

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Habig

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
390 U.S. 222
United States v. Habig et al.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
No. 107. Argued: January 17, 1968 --- Decided: March 5, 1968
Where allegedly false tax returns were filed after the statutory due date (extensions having been granted), the applicable statute of limitations (26 U.S.C. § 6531) held to run from the dates the alleged offenses were committed, i.e., the dates on which the returns were filed, not from the statutory due date. Pp. 224-227.
270 F. Supp. 929, reversed and remanded.
Harris Weinstein argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Joseph M. Howard and Vincent P. Russo.
Lester M. Ponder argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief were Anton Dimitroff and Fred P. Bamberger.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Hailey

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
118 U.S. 233
United States v. Hailey
Argued: May 10, 1886. ---
[Statement of Case from pages 233-235 intentionally omitted]
Sol. Gen. Goode, for the United States.
No appearance for John Hailey, Adm'r etc.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
348 U.S. 215
United States v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Company
Argued: and Submitted Nov. 16, 1954. --- Decided: Jan 10, 1955
Mr.
Charles K. Rice, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Searcy L. Johnson, Dallas, Tex., for respondent Liverpool Ins. Co.
Mr. Arthur S. Goldberg, Dallas, Tex., for respondent Sunnyland Furniture Co.
Mr. Justice MINTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Linn (42 U.S. 104)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    McLean
United States Supreme Court
42 U.S. 104
United States v. Linn
THIS case came up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Illinois, and is a sequel to the case between the same parties reported in 15 Peters, 291, et seq. The circumstances are sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the court.
Legar
e, the attorney-general, for the United States.
Coxe, for the defendants.
Mr. Justice THOMPSON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walt Whitman

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Walt Whitman."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.

## Essays

* "Walt Whitman" (1922), an essay by Stuart Pratt Sherman

## Poems

* "Walt Whitman" (1921, "The master-songs are ended, and the man"), a poem by Edwin Arlington Robinson
* "Walt Whitman" (1919, "Who art thou?—But an atom, quick with song"), a poem by Jaroslav Vrchlický
* "Walt Whitman" (1860, "I celebrate myself"), a poem by Walt Whitman

## See also

* Walt Whitman (1819–1892), American poet, essayist, journalist, and humanist
# Walsh v. Preston Preston

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
109 U.S. 297
Walsh v. Preston Preston

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walsh v. Preston Preston/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
109 U.S. 297
Walsh v. Preston Preston

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walsh v. Rogers

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
54 U.S. 283
Walsh v. Rogers
THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
The libel was filed by the appellants, in the District Court, where they obtained a decree on the 1st May, 1848, for $18,500 and costs. An appeal was taken to the Circuit Court.
On the 19th of February, 1850, the cause was heard finally in the Circuit Court, and upon consideration of all the testimony, as well that considered by the District Court, as the testimony subsequently taken, and arguments of counsel, the judgment of the District Court was declared to be erroneous, was ordered to be reversed and annulled, and the libel to be dismissed at the costs of the appellants.
The libellants then appealed to this court
It was argued by Mr. Fendall and Mr. Chilton, for the appellants, and Mr. Badger, for the appellees.
The questions were exclusively those of fact and evidence, as will be seen by a reference to the opinion of the court. No question of law was raised in the case.
Mr. Justice GRIER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walston v. Nevin Roach

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
128 U.S. 578
Walston v. Nevin Roach
H. M. Lane and J. K. Goodloe, for the motions.
B. F. Buckner, contra.
FULLER, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse