OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Oliver v. United States West Coast Rubber Corporation

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
268 U.S. 1
Oliver v. United States West Coast Rubber Corporation
Argued: March 2, 1925. --- Decided: April 13, 1925
Mr. Louis V. Crowley, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners.
The Attorney General and Messrs. James M. Beck, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., and Merrill E. Otis, of St. Joseph, Mo., for respondents.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Notes on equitation and horse training/Question 18

See also the original scanned version (page images with accompanying text)

## XVIII.

Work at the slow trot.—In one of the first answers we mentioned the utility of the trot and explained the advantages in training resulting from the use of this gait. We can only repeat here what we have said before—the slow trot especially gives excellent results in the last stages of training. Suppling exercises for the haunches, shoulders, and jaw, when executed at this gait produce rapid progress in the horse; they increase his strength and suppleness by forcing him to acquire and preserve his balance.
Small circles.—Small circles lower the horse's croup; the inside hock is necessarily brought under and the outside shoulder is developed because it has a greater distance to travel. Moreover, this work on a restricted circle enables the rider to set a horse that experiences difficulty in bending the body and it aids in breaking up the contraction of the horse that pulls too hard on the hand.
Small circles should be rarely used with horses that hang back, for it is to be noted that on the circle they are especially prone to get behind the bit. Nor should turns be used too much with young horses with blemished or worn-out hocks. As for the aids to be used, it depends upon whether the horse has a tendency to let the haunches swing out or the reverse—to let them drag inside. In the first case the inside rein and the outside leg should predominate; in the second case the important aids will be the inside rein and leg.
Serpentines.—Serpentines produce about the same results as small circles, but in addition they accustom the
​horse to pass from one set (position) to the other easily and while advancing.
Two-track work.—Two-track work at a slow trot on the diagonal of the hall is another method of suppling the hind quarters and bringing them under; it is an excellent preliminary to the gallop lead.
Halts, half-halts, and backing.—When the horse moves freely and begins to be balanced and regular in both gaits, the walk and trot, we must take up the elements of the assemble, which is the gather perfected by bringing the hind legs under.
We begin by numerous halts, the action of the legs always preceding the action of the hand, and by this means alone the hind legs are gradually brought toward the center. If at the moment of halting the horse is contracted and endeavors to bore on the hand, the rider must keep up his action and exact a step or two backward in order to overcome all resistance. He must then promptly move the horse to the front again to avoid his sitting down on the haunches.
Half-halts are made according to the same principles, but the opposition of the hand is less marked than in halts. If the horse proves to be obedient, loosen the fingers and extend him; if, on the contrary, he resists the half-halt, keep up the action of the aids to the halt or even to backing.
# Notes on equitation and horse training/Question 22

See also the original scanned version (page images with accompanying text)

## XXII.

To accustom young horses to the saber.—For the first few days the saber should be worn on the belt and not slung to the saddle. In this manner the saber may more easily be held away from the horse, in case he becomes too excited, and any dangerous struggles resulting from prolonged contact may be avoided. With very nervous horses, the saber, instead of being attached to the belt, may be held in the hand and the lesson can then be easily continued or stopped at will.
The first lesson should be given in the middle of the period of work when the horse's nervousness has already been worn off.
The saber is next slung to the saddle; as soon as the horse has become accustomed to it, the different movements of the saber exercise should be executed until absolute indifference is obtained.
To accustom horses to firearms and noises.—Several methods are used. One of the best is to place the mounted troopers on a large circle; dismounted men are placed in the center, some with revolvers, flags, and trumpets, others with boxes or sieves of oats. At a given signal the noises cease and the horses are turned to the center of the circle where the oats are offered to them.
This same exercise is repeated on circles of smaller radius and when the horses show no further anxiety, they are turned into the center and fed oats while the noises continue.
Another plan is to place in line the dismounted men with the revolvers, flags, and trumpets and have them march around the drill ground. The young horses, also
​in line, follow them about, at first at a distance, gradually approaching and finally eating their oats in the ranks.
However, it is not necessary to enter into minute descriptions of details. It will suffice if the following caution is observed:
Avoid a struggle by starting at a distance from the dismounted men and do not insist brutally on the occasion of a horse's first fright.
Swimming exercises.—Swimming exercises are difficult to carry out, and the results obtained are not always commensurate with the danger to which the men are exposed.
If, however, the horses must be made to swim, the following schedule should be followed:
(1) Make the horse swim, holding him at the end of a longe attached to the halter. In this way you will be more certain to avoid any jerks that would cause him to make false movements. This remark is very important, for if a horse in the water is brought up short he will splash in his struggles and may easily lose his head completely.
(2) After the horses exhibit a certain amount of confidence, they should be mounted, bareback and in snaffle bridle, by men who are excellent swimmers, and then taken across a rather narrow stream. In order to have this exercise carried out under favorable conditions, the banks of the stream should have a gentle slope so that the horse can enter the water gradually, get out without difficulty and not be forced to swim more than a few yards.
(3) The same exercise is repeated once or twice only, with the horses saddled and bridled.
# Oklahoma v. Texas (266 U.S. 546)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
266 U.S. 546
Oklahoma v. Texas (266 U.S. 546)

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Oklahoma v. Texas (265 U.S. 76)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 76
Oklahoma v. Texas (265 U.S. 76)
Order.-
It appearing from the twelfth report made by the receiver in this cause that an action recently was commenced against him in the District Court of Wichita County, Tex., by J. H. Duhon and H. J. Kebideaux to recover from him certain moneys for the drilling of a river-bed well, now known as No. 168 and also as Delta well, which had been drilled prior to the receivership; and it being asserted that such action was commenced in disregard of the exclusive jurisdiction of this court over the said receivership and the said receiver; it is ordered that the said J. H. Duhon and H. J. Kebideaux, show cause in this court on Monday, the 26th day of May, 1924, why they should not be enjoined from prosecuting or maintaining the said action in the District Court of Wichita County, Tex., unless in the meantime they shall have dismissed that action and filed in this court due proof of such dismissal.
Order.-After considering the twelfth report of the receiver herein and the earlier reports referred to therein, it is ordered that all parties in interest be accorded until and including the 23d day of May, 1924, to prepare and file with the clerk in printed form such suggestions, contentions, and supporting arguments as they severally may desire to present respecting the following subjects:
1. The extent to which and the manner in which the expenses of conducting and administering the receivership shall be spread over the several impounded funds in the receiver's custody and over the several areas and tracts from which such funds were derived, and also the proportions in which such expenses shall be deducted from the payments ultimately to be made to the several claimants who may be entitled to receive those funds from the receiver.
2. The mode of distributing or disposing of expenses incurred and losses sustained in respect of wells which have proved unremunerative.
3. Whether the order of June 1, 1921, authorizing the receiver to make certain payments reimbursing operators and drillers of river-bed wells (256 U.S. 607, 41 Sup. Ct. 539, 65 L. Ed. 1114, 1118) shall be changed and enlarged so as to include and cover river-bed wells which subsequently proved to be unremunerative in instances where the same operator had drilled or was in process of drilling other river-bed wells which have proved productive and have yieled funds from which such reimbursement may be made-reference being particularly had to wells numbered 149, 150, 151, 155, 161, and 163 described on pages 9 and 10 of the receiver's tenth report.
4. Whether the order of June 1, 1921, just mentioned shall be further changed and enlarged so as to include and cover river-bed well No. 139, otherwise known as the Burk-Senator well.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Oklahoma v. Texas (266 U.S. 546)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
266 U.S. 546
Oklahoma v. Texas (266 U.S. 546)
Mr. S. P. Freeling, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for the State of Oklahoma.
Messrs. C. W. Taylor, of Corsicana, Tex., and Orville Bullington and A. H. Carrigan, both of Wichita Falls, Tex., for the State of Texas.
The commissioners heretofore designated to run, locate and mark upon the ground portions of the boundary line between the States of Texas and Oklahoma, where it follows the course of the Red River, having this day presented a report, with accompanying maps, showing that they have run, located and marked upon the ground the portion of the boundary along the Fort Augur Area, that is to say, from the westerly end of the Big Bend Area to a southerly extension of the west line of range sixteen west in Oklahoma; and it appearing from such report that the said commissioners have transmitted copies of such report, with the accompanying maps, by registered mail to the Attorney General of the United States, the Attorney General of the State of Texas and the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, and have lodged with the clerk fifty additional copies of such report and maps for the use of such private interveners as may apply for them; it is ordered that the said report, with the accompanying maps, be received and filed by the clerk. And it is further ordered that all objections or exceptions to such report, if there be any such objections or exceptions, shall be presented to the court or filed with the clerk within a period of four weeks from this date; and the period heretofore fixed for presenting or filing such objections or exceptions is limited and modified accordingly.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Oklahoma v. Texas (265 U.S. 490)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 490
Oklahoma v. Texas (265 U.S. 490)
Argued: June 9, 1924. ---
Messrs. Arch Dawson and H. O. Williams, both of Wichita Falls, Tex., for respondents.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Oklahoma v. Texas (265 U.S. 500)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 500
Oklahoma v. Texas (265 U.S. 500)

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Oklahoma v. Texas (265 U.S. 76)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 76
Oklahoma v. Texas (265 U.S. 76)
Mr. George F. Short, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for complainant.
Messrs. C. W. Taylor, of Corsicana, Tex., A. H. Carrigan, of Wichita Falls, Tex., W. A. Keeling, of Mexia, Tex., and T. W. Gregory, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Oklahoma v. Texas (266 U.S. 298)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
266 U.S. 298
Oklahoma v. Texas (266 U.S. 298)
Argued: on Motion Nov. 17, 1924. --- Decided: Nov 18, 1924
Mr. S. P. Freeling, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for State of Oklahoma.
Messrs. W. A. Keeling, of Mexia, Tex., Thomas Watt Gregory, of Washington, D. C., C. W. Taylor, of Corsicana, Tex., and Orville Bullington and A. H. Carrigan, both of Wichita Falls, Tex., for the State of Texas.
Mr. John S. Flannery, of Washington, D. C., for receiver.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 10/Beppo, the conscript - Part 16

←Part 15Part 17→
​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/140 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/141 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/142 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/143 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/144 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/145 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/146
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 10/Beppo, the conscript - Part 15

←Part 14Part 16→
​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/108 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/109 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/110 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/111 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/112
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 10/Beppo, the conscript - Part 18

←Part 17Part 19→
​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/197 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/198 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/199 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/200 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/201 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/202
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 10/Beppo, the conscript - Part 20

←Part 19Part 21→
​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/256 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/257 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/258 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/259
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 10/Beppo, the conscript - Part 22

←Part 21Part 23→
​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/306 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/307 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/308 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/309 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/310 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/311 ​Page:010 Once a week Volume X Dec 1863 to Jun 64.pdf/312
# Patience (Wharton)

PATIENCE and I have traveled hand in hand So many days that I have grown to trace The lines of sad, sweet beauty in her face, And all its veiled depths to understand.
Not beautiful is she to eyes profane; Silent and unrevealed her holy charms;
But, like a mother's, her serene, strong arms Uphold my footsteps on the path of pain.
I long to cry, -- her soft voice whispers, "Nay!" I seek to fly, but she restrains my feet; In wisdom stern, yet in compassion sweet, She guides my helpless wanderings, day by day.
O my Beloved, life's golden visions fade, And one by one life's phantom joys depart; They leave a sudden darkness in the heart, And patience fills their empty place instead.
# On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures/Introduction

ON THE ECONOMY
OF
MANUFACTURES
INTRODUCTION.
The object of the present volume is to point out the effects and the advantages which arise from the use of tools and machines, to endeavour to classify their modes of action; and to trace both the causes and the consequences of applying machinery to supersede the skill and power of the human arm.
A view of the mechanical part of the subject will, in the first instance, occupy our attention, and to this the first section of the work will be devoted. The first chapter of the section will contain some remarks on the general sources from whence the advantages of machinery are derived, and the succeeding nine chapters will contain a detailed examination of principles of a less general character. The eleventh chapter contains numerous subdivisions, and is important from the extensive classification it affords of the arts in which copying is so largely ​employed. The twelfth chapter, which completes the first section, contains a few suggestions for the assistance of those who propose visiting manufactories.
The second section, after an introductory chapter on the difference between making and manufacturing, will contain, in the succeeding chapters, a discussion of many of the questions which relate to the political economy of the subject. It was found that the domestic arrangement, or interior economy of factories, was so interwoven with the more general questions, that it was deemed unadvisable to separate the two subjects. The concluding chapter of this section, and of the work itself, relates to the future prospects of manufactures, as arising from the application of science.
Layout 2
# On the Education of the People of India

* related portals: India.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
On
THE EDUCATION
of the
PEOPLE OF INDIA.
London: Printed by A. Spottiswoodf, New-Street-Square.
of the bengal civil service.
LONDON:
LONGMAN, ORME, BROWN, GREEN, & LONGMANS,
paternoster-row.
1838.
CHAPTER I.
The Measures first adopted for educating the Natives.—The Establishment of the Committee of Public Instruction.—Their first Plan of Operations.—The Difference of Opinion which arose.—The Resolution of Government of the 7th March 1835.—The Measures adopted by the Committee in consequence.—No Distinction of Caste allowed in the new Seminaries.—Cultivation of the vernacular Languages.—Education of the Wards of Government.—The Medical College.—Mr. Adam’s Deputation. - - Page 1
CHAPTER II.
CHAPTER III.
The violent Opposition made by Oriental Scholars to the Resolution of the 7th March 1835.—The whole Question rests upon Two Points; first, Whether English or Arabic and Sanskrit Literature is best calculated for the Improvement of the People of India; and, secondly, Whether, supposing English Literature to be best adapted for that Purpose, the Natives are willing to cultivate it?—These Points considered. - Page 50
CHAPTER IV.
Objections answered.—Construction of the Charter Act of 1813.—Change in the Employment of the public Endowments for the Encouragement of Learning.—Abolition of Stipends.—Probability of the Natives being able to prosecute the Study of English with effect.—The alleged Necessity of cultivating Arabic and Sanskrit for the sake of improving the vernacular Languages.—The Plan of employing Maulavees and Pundits as our Agents for the Propagation of European Science.—Whether or not it is our Duty to patronise the same Kind of Learning as our Predecessors. ----- Page 95
CHAPTER V.
Proofs that the Time has arrived for taking up the Question of National Education.—The Disuse of the Persian Language.—The many important bearings of this ​Change.—The Codification of the Mahommedan and Hindu Law.—The increased Employment of the Natives.—The Concurrence of all Classes of the Community towards the Object. - Page 143
CHAPTER VI.
The Establishment of a Seminary at each Zillah Station, a necessary Preliminary to further Operations.—The Preparation of Books in the Vernacular Languages.—A Law of Copyright required.—Native Education in the Madras and Bombay Presidencies.—The Establishment of a comprehensive System of public Instruction for the whole of British India urgently required.—The public Importance of a separate Provision being made for the Prosecution of Researches into ancient Asiatic Literature. - - 170
CHAPTER VII.
The Political Tendency of the different Systems of Education in use in India. - - 187
APPENDIX.
Extract from the Report of the Committee appointed by the Indian Government to inquire into the State of Medical Education. - - Page 207
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997/Division A
## DIVISION A — APPROPRIATIONS AND OFFSETS

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
    That the following sums are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the several departments, agencies, corporations and other organizational units of the Government for the fiscal year 1997, and for other purposes, namely:
# Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990/Title XIII/Subtitle D
## SUBTITLE D — Treatment of Fiscal Year 1991 Sequestration
### Sec. 13401. Restoration of Funds Sequestered.

    (a) ORDER RESCINDED.—
       Upon the enactment of this Act, the orders issued by the President on August 25, 1990, and October 15, 1990, pursuant to section 252 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 are hereby rescinded.
    (b) AMOUNTS RESTORED.—
       Any action taken to implement the orders referred to in subsection (a) shall be reversed, and any sequestrable resource that has been reduced or sequestered by such orders is hereby restored, revived, or released and shall be available to the same extent and for the same purpose as if the orders had not been issued.
    (c) FURLOUGHED EMPLOYEES.—
          (1) Federal employees furloughed as a result of the lapse in appropriations from midnight October 5, 1990, until the enactment of House Joint Resolution 666 shall be compensated at their standard rate of compensation for the period during which there was a lapse in appropriations.
          (2) All obligations incurred in anticipation of the appropriations made and authority granted by House Joint Resolution 666 for the purposes of maintaining the essential level of activity to protect life and property and bringing about orderly termination of government functions are hereby ratified and approved if otherwise in accord with the provisions of that Act.