OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/O'Grady, Major Hugh Hamon Massy

later 7th Viscount Guillamore, second cousin of 6th Viscount Guillamore
​O'GRADY, Major Hugh Hamon Massy, B.A. (T.C.D.). Major late Royal Sussex Regt.; served in Nile Campaign, 1884; S. African War, 1899-1901. Educ.: Trinity College, Dublin. Recns.: fishing, shooting. Son of late Hugh O'Grady, D.L., of Castlegarde: b. 1860: m. 1890, Mary, dau. of late Vere Hunt, J.P., of High Park, Tipperary. Res.: Castlegarde, Pallasgreen, Co. Limerick.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/O'Hara, Arthur Cooper

​O'HARA, Arthur Cooper, D.L., J.P., Co. Sligo (High Sheriff, 1903). Second son of late Charles William O'Hara, M.P., D.L., J.P., of Annaghmore and Coopershill, Co. Sligo: b. 1862. Res.: Coopershill, Riverstown, Ballymote, Co. Sligo.
# Treat Manufacturing Company v. Standard Steel Iron Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
157 U.S. 674
Treat Manufacturing Company v. Standard Steel Iron Company
William G. Beale and E S. Isham, for the motion.
John S.C.ooper, in opposition.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Treat v. Jemison

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
87 U.S. 652
Treat v. Jemison

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Treat'em Rough!

Source: U.S. National Archives and Records Administration
TREAT'EM ROUGH!
JOIN THE
TANKS
United States Tank Corps.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Treat Manufacturing Company v. Standard Steel Iron Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
157 U.S. 674
Treat Manufacturing Company v. Standard Steel Iron Company
This was an action of trespass on the case. At the conclusion of the trial, defendants moved the court to charge the jury to find the issues for defendants, which motion was granted, and the jury was directed, upon the whole case, to return a verdict for defendants, plaintiff duly excepting. Thereupon the jury returned a verdict accordingly. Plaintiff moved for a new trial, which was denied, and judgment was given against plaintiff on the verdict. This judgment was rendered December 3, 1890. The writ of error from this court was brought November 24, 1891. The only ground relied on to sustain the jurisdiction of this court is that the case 'involves the construction or application of the constitution of the United States,' because plaintiff in error was deprived of the right of trial by jury. But it is well settled that where the trial judge is satisfied upon the evidence that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover, and that a verdict, if rendered for plaintiff, must be set aside, the court may instruct the jury to find for the defendant. Grand Chute v. Winegar, 15 Wall. 355; Marion Co. v. Clark, 94 U.S. 278; Herbert v. Butler, 97 U.S. 319.
If the court errs, as matter of law, in so doing, the remedy lies in a review in the appropriate court.
Writ of error dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Treasures of Congress/Page 3

The First Congress: The Bill of Rights
Some delegates to the Constitutional Convention had suggested adding a Bill of Rights to the Constitution, but the idea generated little support.
James Madison (1751–1836)
By James Sharples, 1796–97
Courtesy of Independence Hall National Historical Park
Not to be used without permission
Printed annotated version of House Joint Resolution Amending the Constitution and proposing a Bill of Rights with 17 amendments, August 25, 1789
National Archives and Records Administration, Records of the U.S. Senate
Printed annotated House Joint Resolution Amending the Constitution and proposing a Bill of Rights with 12 amendments passed by the Senate, September 9, 1789
National Archives and Records Administration, Records of the U.S. Senate
By the time Representative Madison’s proposals passed the Senate on September 9, several changes had been made. Perhaps the most dramatic of these was the loss of the preamble which declared the government "ought to be exercised for the benefit of the people; which consists in the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the right of acquiring and using property, and generally of pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety."
The amendments are “limited to points which are important in the eyes of many and can be objectionable in those of none. The structure & stamina of Govt. are as little touched as possible.”
Representative James Madison to Edmund Randolph, June 15, 1789
Some delegates to the Constitutional Convention had suggested adding a Bill of Rights to the Constitution, but the idea generated little support. When opponents of the Constitution used the lack of a Bill of Rights to whip up opposition to ratification the issue resurfaced. Several states adopted the new Constitution because its supporters promised that Congress would take up the issue and amend the Constitution.
Representative James Madison of Virginia had originally thought a Bill of Rights was unnecessary, but by the time of the First Congress he realized that such amendments were a political necessity. On June 8, 1789, with the support of President Washington, Madison proposed several amendments on the House floor. In September, after reorganizing the proposals several times, Congress submitted 12 amendments for ratification. On December 15, 1791, Virginia became the 11th state to ratify 10 of the 12 proposed. These became the first 10 amendments to the Constitution. The two that failed dealt with the size of the House and with congressional pay raises. The latter, however, was eventually ratified by the states in 1992 and became the 27th Amendment to the Constitution.
# Treat v. Grand Canyon Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
222 U.S. 448
Treat v. Grand Canyon Railway Company
Argued: December 8 and 11, 1911. --- Decided: January 9, 1912
Messrs. William C. Prentiss, Elias S.C.lark, and Henry F. Ashurst for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from Page 449 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Robert Dunlap, T. J. Norton, and Gardiner Lathrop for appellee.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# This Little Pig

English language nursery rhyme and fingerplay. It has a Roud Folk Song Index number of 19297. In 1728, the first line of the rhyme appeared in a medley called "The Nurse's Song". The first known full version was recorded in The Famous Tommy Thumb's Little Story-Book, published in London about 1760.
* "This Little Piggie" in Children's Amusements by Walter Gregor (The Folk-Lore Journal, 1886)
* "This little pig went to market" in Dorsetshire Children's Games, &c by John Symonds Udal (The Folk-Lore Journal, 1889)
* "This little pig went to market" in A Book of Nursery Songs and Rhymes by Sabine Baring-Gould (1895).
* "This little pig went to market" in A Book of Nursery Rhymes by Charles Welsh (1901).
* "Five Toes" in The Real Mother Goose by Blanche Fisher Wright (1916)
* "This pig went to market" in Cecily Parsley's Nursery Rhymes by Beatrix Potter (1922).

## See also

* The Five Little Pigs, expanded retelling of the nursery rhyme
# This Merit hath the worst—

* "This merit hath the worst" in Poems: Second Series (1891)
* "This merit hath the worst" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# This Side of Paradise/Book One

BOOK ONE THE ROMANTIC EGOTIST
BOOK ONE: THE ROMANTIC EGOTIST
* CHAPTERPAGE
* I.AMORY, SON OF BEATRICE................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................3
* II.SPIRES AND GARGOYLES................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................41
* III.THE EGOTIST CONSIDERS................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................99
* IV.NARCISSUS OFF DUTY................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................131
# Thompson v. Thompson (226 U.S. 551)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
226 U.S. 551
Thompson v. Thompson
Argued: November 8, 1912. --- Decided: January 6, 1913
Mr. William M. Lewin for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 552-555 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Joseph W. Cox, A. E. L. Leckie, and John A. Kratz, Jr., for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 555-557 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Pitney delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Thompson v. Thompson (218 U.S. 611)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
218 U.S. 611
Thompson v. Thompson
Argued: and submitted October 27, 1910. --- Decided: December 12, 1910
Mr. William M. Lewin for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 611-614 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. A. E. L. Leckie, Creed M. Fulton, Joseph W. Cox, and John A. Kratz, Jr., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Thompson v. Texas Mexican Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
328 U.S. 134
Thompson v. Texas Mexican Railway Company
Argued: Oct. 9, 1945. --- Decided: April 29, 1946
[Syllabus from pages 134-136 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Robert H. Kelley, of Houston, Tex., for petitioners.
Mr. John P. bullington, of Houston, Tex., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Thompson v. Thompson

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Thompson v. Thompson."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Thompson v. Thompson (218 U.S. 611)
* Thompson v. Thompson (226 U.S. 551)
# Tristram of Lyonesse and Other Poems

First published in 1882, this transcription is of the first edition. A number of the works it contains had previously been published in periodicals. Where this is the case, the details are included for each work based on A Bibliography of the Writings in Prose and Verse of Algernon Charles Swinburne (1912), by Thomas James Wise, in 2 volumes.
TRISTRAM OF LYONESSE
AND OTHER POEMS
BY
ALGERNON CHARLES SWINBURNE
London CHATTO & WINDUS, PICCADILLY 1882
All rights reserved
LONDON: PRINTED BY SPOTTISWOODE AND CO., NEW-STREET SQUARE AND PARLIAMENT STREET
TO MY BEST FRIEND
THEODORE WATTS
I DEDICATE IN THIS BOOK
THE BEST I HAVE TO GIVE HIM
CONTENTS
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tristram of Lyonesse and Other Poems/A Child's Future

A CHILD'S FUTURE.
What will it please you, my darling, hereafter to be? Fame upon land will you look for, or glory by sea? Gallant your life will be always, and all of it free.
Free as the wind when the heart of the twilight is stirred Eastward, and sounds from the springs of the sunrise are heard: Free—and we know not another as infinite word.
Darkness or twilight or sunlight may compass us round, Hate may arise up against us, or hope may confound; Love may forsake us; yet may not the spirit be bound.
Free in oppression of grief as in ardour of joy Still may the soul be, and each to her strength as a toy: Free in the glance of the man as the smile of the boy.
Freedom alone is the salt and the spirit that gives Life, and without her is nothing that verily lives: Death cannot slay her: she laughs upon death and forgives.
Brightest and hardiest of roses anear and afar Glitters the blithe little face of you, round as a star: Liberty bless you and keep you to be as you are.
England and liberty bless you and keep you to be Worthy the name of their child and the sight of their sea: Fear not at all; for a slave, if he fears not, is free.
# Tristram (Robinson)/Canto 9

IX
# Tristram of Lyonesse and Other Poems/A Child's Pity

A CHILD'S PITY.
No sweeter thing than children's ways and wiles, Surely, we say, can gladden eyes and ears: Yet sometime sweeter than their words or smiles Are even their tears.
To one for once a piteous tale was read, How, when the murderous mother crocodile Was slain, her fierce brood famished, and lay dead, Starved, by the Nile.
In vast green reed-beds on the vast grey slime Those monsters motherless and helpless lay, Perishing only for the parent's crime Whose seed were they.
Hours after, toward the dusk, our blithe small bird Of Paradise, who has our hearts in keeping, Was heard or seen, but hardly seen or heard, For pity weeping.
He was so sorry, sitting still apart, For the poor little crocodiles, he said. Six years had given him, for an angel's heart, A child's instead.
Feigned tears the false beasts shed for murderous ends, We know from travellers' tales of crocodiles: But these tears wept upon them of my friend's Outshine his smiles.
What heavenliest angels of what heavenly city Could match the heavenly heart in children here? The heart that hallowing all things with its pity Casts out all fear?
So lovely, so divine, so dear their laughter Seems to us, we know not what could be more dear: But lovelier yet we see the sign thereafter Of such a tear.
With sense of love half laughing and half weeping We met your tears, our small sweet-spirited friend: Let your love have us in its heavenly keeping To life's last end.
# Tristram of Lyonesse and Other Poems/A Child's Laughter

A CHILD'S LAUGHTER.
All the bells of heaven may ring, All the birds of heaven may sing, All the wells on earth may spring, All the winds on earth may bring All sweet sounds together; Sweeter far than all things heard, Hand of harper, tone of bird, Sound of woods at sundawn stirred, Welling water’s winsome word, Wind in warm wan weather,
One thing yet there is, that none Hearing ere its chime be done Knows not well the sweetest one Heard of man beneath the sun, Hoped in heaven hereafter; Soft and strong and loud and light, Very sound of very light Heard from morning’s rosiest height, When the soul of all delight Fills a child’s clear laughter.
Golden bells of welcome rolled Never forth such notes, nor told Hours so blithe in tones so bold, As the radiant mouth of gold Here that rings forth heaven. If the golden-crested wren Were a nightingale—why, then, Something seen and heard of men Might be half as sweet as when Laughs a child of seven.
# Tristram of Lyonesse and Other Poems/A Child's Thanks

A CHILD'S THANKS.
How low soe’er men rank us, How high soe’er we win, The children far above us Dwell, and they deign to love us, With lovelier love than ours, And smiles more sweet than flowers; As though the sun should thank us For letting light come in.
With too divine complaisance, Whose grace misleads them thus, Being gods, in heavenly blindness They call our worship kindness, Our pebble-gift a gem: They think us good to them, Whose glance, whose breath, whose presence, Are gifts too good for us.
The poet high and hoary Of meres that mountains bind Felt his great heart more often Yearn, and its proud strength soften
From stern to tenderer mood, At thought of gratitude Shown than of song or story He heard of hearts unkind.
But with what words for token And what adoring tears Of reverence risen to passion, In what glad prostrate fashion Of spirit and soul subdued, May man show gratitude For thanks of children spoken That hover in his ears?
The angels laugh, your brothers, Child, hearing you thank me, With eyes whence night grows sunny, And touch of lips like honey, And words like honey-dew: But how shall I thank you? For gifts above all others What guerdon-gift may be?
What wealth of words caressing, What choice of songs found best, Would seem not as derision, Found vain beside the vision And glory from above Shown in a child's heart's love? His part in life is blessing; Ours, only to be blest.
# Tristram (Robinson)/Canto 8

VIII
# Troutman v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
397 U.S. 48
Troutman v. United States
George C. Pontikes, for petitioner David Barner Troutman.
Howard Moore, Jr., for petitioner John Wesley Battiste.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, and Philip R. Monahan, for the United States in No. 623.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome Feit and Edward Fenig, for the United States in No. 411, Misc.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Troutman v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
397 U.S. 48
Troutman v. United States
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis in No. 411, Misc., is granted. The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments are vacated, and the cases remanded to the respective United States Courts of Appeals for further consideration in light of Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295, 90 S.Ct. 506, 24 L.Ed.2d 532.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Troxel v. Granville/Concurrence Thomas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Souter Thomas
* Dissenting Opinions Stevens Scalia Kennedy
Justice Thomas, concurring in the judgment.
I write separately to note that neither party has argued that our substantive due process cases were wrongly decided and that the original understanding of the Due Process Clause precludes judicial enforcement of unenumerated rights under that constitutional provision. As a result, I express no view on the merits of this matter, and I understand the plurality as well to leave the resolution of that issue for another day.
Consequently, I agree with the plurality that this Court's recognition of a fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing of their children resolves this case. Our decision in Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925), holds that parents have a fundamental constitutional right to rear their children, including the right to determine who shall educate and socialize them. The opinions of the plurality, Justice Kennedy, and Justice Souter recognize such a right, but curiously none of them articulates the appropriate standard of review. I would apply strict scrutiny to infringements of fundamental rights. Here, the State of Washington lacks even a legitimate governmental interest-to say nothing of a compelling one-in second-guessing a fit parent's decision regarding visitation with third parties. On this basis, I would affirm the judgment below.

## Note

* ↑ This case also does not involve a challenge based upon the Privileges and Immunities Clause and thus does not present an opportunity to reevaluate the meaning of that Clause. See Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489, 527-528 (1999) (Thomas, J., dissenting).
# Through South Westland/Part 2

* Chapter I—The Start
* Chapter II—Dead Man's Gully
* Chapter III—The Berline
* Chapter IV—The Niger Hut
* Chapter V—The Old Homestead
* Chapter VI—The Shieling on the Matukituki
* Chapter VII—The Rob Roy
* Chapter VIII—Life on the Matukituki
* Chapter IX—Storm
* Chapter X—The Silver Cone
* Chapter XI—The Lost Trail
* Chapter XII—Farewell
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Bomford, George Lyndon

​BOMFORD, George Lyndon, J.P., Co. Meath: eldest son of late John Francis Bomford, J.P., of Oakley Park, Co. Meath; b. 1867; m. 1897, Helen Maude M., 3rd dau. of Rev. John Warren Corbould-Warren, Rector of Talcolneston, Norfolk. Res.: Oakley Park, Kells, Co. Meath.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Blayney, Alexander Joseph Mcauley

​BLAYNEY, Alexander Joseph McAuley, M.B., M.A. (R.U.I.), F.R.C.S.I. Educ.: St. Malachy's Coll., Belfast, and Catholic Univ., Dublin; Extern Examiner in Surgery, Dublin Univ.; Surgeon, Mater Misericordise Hospital, Dublin; Prof, of Biology and Assist. Prof, of Surgery at Univ. College, Dublin, since 1909; Visiting Surgeon to Maynooth College; late Examiner in Surgery, R.C.S.I.; Examiner in Biology, R.U.I.; late Major, R.A.M.C.; son of Alexander Blayney, shipowner, of Cushendall, Co. Antrim; b. 1869; m. 1908 Mary (d. 1909), dau. of Michael Magan. Res.: 15 Merrion Square, Dublin.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Blunden, Sir Wm.

​BLUNDEN, Sir Wm., Baronet, (Irld., 1766); B.A., M.B. (T.C.D.), L.R.C.S.I., L.M.K.Q.C.P.; High Sheriff, Co. Kilkenny, 1904-05; eldest son of Sir John, 3rd Bart., and Elizabeth (d. 1900), 3rd dau. ​of the late Major John Knox, of Dublin; b. 25th July, 1840; s. his father, 17th Jan., 1890; m. 26th April, 1879, Florence, dau. of Henry Shuttleworth, and has issue two sons and a dau. Res.: Castle Biunden, Kilkenny.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Blosse, Sir Robert Lynch

​BLOSSE, Sir Robert Lynch, Baronet (Irld., 1622), late Capt. King's Own Scottish Borderers: Major, Royal Irish Fusiliers; J.P., D.L., Co. Mayo (High Sheriff, 1921); J.P., Co. Kilkenny; second son of Sir Robert, 10th Bart., and Lady Harriett Browne (d. 1904), dau. of 2nd Marquess of Sligo; b. 14th Feb., 1861; s. his brother, as 12th Bart., 17th Aug., 1918; m. 1893, Alice, dau. of E. Pery Knox-Gore, of Coolcroonen House, Ballina, Co. Mayo, and has issue a dau., Alice Cecil Emily. Kildare Street Club. Dublin; Royal St. George Yacht Club, Kingstown.