OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Grand Chute v. Winegar in Equity

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
82 U.S. 373
Grand Chute v. Winegar in Equity
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
The town of Grand Chute, in Wisconsin, filed its bill or the equity side of the court below against one Winegar three other persons, Goodwin, Hewett, and Conkey, being also made defendants. It set forth that Winegar had brought suit on the law side of the same court against the town to recover from it the amount of certain bonds-nine in number, and for the sum of $8500 in all purporting to have been issued by the said town; that the bonds were issued without authority, in violation of law, and in fraud of the town, by the other defendants, Goodwin, Hewett, and Conkey; that for reasons set forth in the bill the bonds had no legal force or validity; that the transfer of them to Winegar was colorable merely; that he paid no valuable consideration on the pretended purchase; that though he had given his notes for them, he was a bankrupt and altogether 'irresponsible in a financial point of view;' that he knew all the facts in relation to the issue, and that he never had any right or title to the said pretended bonds, or to any of them. It was further alleged that Winegar was a citizen of the State of New York, and that the other defendants were citizens of Wisconsin. The bill prayed that an injunction might be issued restraining Winegar and his confederates from the further prosecution of suit on the bonds, and that the bonds themselves might be adjudged to be fraudulent and void, and be decreed to be cancelled. To this bill the defendants demurred. The demurrer was sustained in the court below, and the complainant now appealed to this court.
Mr. G. W. Lakin, for the appellant; Mr. H. L. Palmer, contra.
Mr. Justice HUNT delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Grand Army War Songs

(Upload an image to replace this placeholder.)
Compiled Expressly for the Grand Army of the Republic.
GRAND ARMY WAR SONGS
A COLLECTION OF
WAR SONGS, BATTLE SONGS, CAMP SONGS, NATIONAL SONGS, MARCHING SONGS, ETC.,
——AS SUNG BY——
OUR BOYS IN BLUE IN CAMP AND FIELD
TO WHICH IS ADDED A SELECTION OF
MEMORIAL SONGS AND HYMNS FOR USE ON DECORATION DAY
AND OTHER SPECIAL OCCASIONS.
The Choruses Have all Been Arranged for MALE VOICES and the Entire Work
EDITED BY
WILSON G. SMITH.
——PUBLISHED BY——
——————S. BRAINARD'S SONS,—————— CLEVELAND AND CHICAGO.
Copyright Mdccccxxxvi, by S. Brainard's Sons.
CONTENTS:
PAGE
MEMORIAL.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Highland plaid (2)

The Highland Plaid.
REMEMBER ME.
The Girl of my heart.
The last Rose of Summer.
LOVE HAS EYES.
Edinburgh, Printed for the Booksellers.
* The Highland Plaid
* Go Where Glory Waits Thee
* The Girl O' My Heart
* The Last Rose of Summer
* Love Has Eyes
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Highland plaid (2)/Go Where Glory Waits Thee

GO WHERE GLORY WAITS THEE.
Go where glory waits thee, But while fame elates thee, Oh! still remember me, When the praise thou meetest, To thine ear is sweetest, Oh! then remember me, Other arms may press thee, Dearer friends caress thee,
​All the joys that bless thee, Sweeter far may be; But when friends are nearest, And when joys are dearest, Oh! then remember me.
When at eve thou rovest, By the star thou lovest, Oh! then remember me. Think when home returning, Bright we've seen it burning. Oh! then remember me. Oft as summer closes, When thine eye reposes, On its ling’ring roses, Once so lov'd by thee: Think on her who wove them, Her who made three love them, Oh! then remember me.
When around thee dying, Autumn leaves are lying, Oh! then remember me, And, at night, when gazing On the gay hearth blazing, Oh! then remember me. Then should music stealing All the soul of feeling,
​To thy heart appealing, Draw one tear from thee; Then let memory bring thee, Strains I us’d to sing thee, Oh! then remember me.
# Highland plaid (2)/Love Has Eyes

LOVE HAS EYES.
Love's blind, they say, O never, nay: Can words Love's grace impart? The fancy, weak, The tounge may speak, But eyes alone th heart. In one soft look what language lies! O yes, believe me, Love has eyes.
​Love‘s wing’d, they cry— O never, I— On pinions love to soar; Deceivers rove, But never love, Attach'd he moves no more; Can he have wings who never flies? And yes, believe me, Love has eyes.
F I N I S.
# Highland plaid (2)/The Highland Plaid

THE HIGHLAND PLAID.
Lowland lassie wilt thou go Where the hills are clad wi‘ snow; Where beneath the icy steep, The hardy shepherd tends his sheep? Ill nor wae shall thee betide, When row‘d within my Highland Plaid.
Soon the voice of cheery spring Will gar a' our plantins ring; Soon our bonnie heather braes, Will put on their simmer claes; On the mountains sunnie side, We'll lean us on my Highland Plaid.
When the summer spreads the flowers, Busks the glens in leafy bowers, Then we'll seek the cauler shade, Lean us on the primrose bed: While the burning hours preside, I'll screen thee wi' my Highland Plaid.
Then we'll leave the sheep and goat, I will launch the bonny boat, Skim the loch in cantie glee, Rest the oars to pleasure thee;
​When chilly breezes sweep the tide, I'll hap thee wi' my Highland Plaid.
Lowland lads may dress mair fine, Woo in words mair saft than mine; Lowland lads hae mair of art, A' my boast ‘s an honest heart, Whilk shall ever be my pride- O row thee in my Highland Plaid.
Bonnie lad, ye've been sae leal, My heart wad break at our fareweel; Lang your love has made me fain, Tak me-tak me for your ain. Cross the Frith, away they glide, Young Donald and his Lowland bride.
# Highland plaid (2)/The Girl O' My Heart

THE GIRL OF MY HEART.
I have parks, I have grounds, I have deer, I have hounds, And for sporting a neat little cottage, I have youth I have wealth, I have strength, I have wealth, Yet I mop like a beau in his dottage, What can I want?-’Tis the girl of my heart, To share those treasures with me, For had I the wealth which the Indies impart, No pleasure would it give me, Without the lovely girl of my heart. The sweet lovely girl of my heart.
My domain far extends, And sustains social friends, Who make music divinely enchanting;
​We have balls, we have plays, We have routs, public days, And yet still I find something is wanting What should it be but the girl of my heart, To share those treasures with me! For had I the wealth which the Indies impart, No pleasure would it give me, Without the lovely girl of my heart, Then give me the girl of my heart.
# Impression: Le Réveillon

Subtitle: "Le Réveillon"
* "Impression: Le Réveillon" in The Writings of Oscar Wilde (1907)
* "Impression: Le Réveillon" in The Poems of Oscar Wilde (1909)
# Impression

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Impression."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Impression", a poem by Clark Ashton Smith
* "Impression: Le Réveillon", a poem by Oscar Wilde

### See also

* Impressions
# Herndon v. Lowry

United States Supreme Court
301 U.S. 242
Herndon v. Lowry
Argued: Feb. 8, 1937. --- Decided: April 26, 1937
Appeals from the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia.
Mr. Whitney North Seymour, of New York City, for appellant.
Mr. J. Walter Le Craw, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Herndon v. Howard

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
76 U.S. 664
Herndon v. Howard
IN this case Herndon had taken an appeal from the Circuit Court for the Western District of Texas; and after doing so had become bankrupt. His assignee in bankruptcy-one Masterson-now moved to be admitted as a party appellant in the cause with the original appellant, Herndon.
His motion was supported by the production of the deed of assignment of the register in bankruptcy of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Texas, in the matter of his bankruptcy to Masterson, duly attested by the clerk of the court. The motion was founded upon the fourteenth section of the Bankrupt Law, which provides that the assignee in bankruptcy may prosecute and defend in his own name all suits at law and in equity pending at the time of the adjudication of bankruptcy, in which the bankrupt is a party, in the same manner and with the like effect as they might have been prosecuted or defendant by the bankrupt, and which makes a copy of the register's assignment, duly certified by the clerk of the proper court, conclusive evidence of the right of the assignee to use.
The CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Herndon v. Georgia

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
295 U.S. 441
Herndon v. Georgia
Argued: April 12, 1935. --- Decided: May 20, 1935
Mr. Whitney North Seymour, of New York City, for appellant.
Mr. J. Walter Le Craw, of Atlanta, Ga., for the State of Georgia.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Herndon v. Ridgway

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
58 U.S. 424
Herndon v. Ridgway
THIS was an appeal from the district court of the United States, for the northern district of Mississippi.
It was a bill filed by Herndon, under the circumstances stated in the opinion of the court, and which was dismissed by the court below.
The process against Davis was served upon Messrs. Dowd and Murphy, his attorneys. A motion was made to dismiss the bill for three reasons, the second of which was:--
'Because Henry Davis is not a citizen of the northern district of Mississippi, and Dowd and Murphy are not his attorneys of redord in any of the courts of the United States, and have not instituted proceedings or suit therein against said Herndon, but are attorneys of record of said Davis, in the circuit court of Monroe county, Mississippi, a state court, as per affidavit on file.' The affidavit was as follows:--
'In open court personally appeared Wm. F. Dowd, one of the firm of Dowd and Murphy, who made oath that Dowd and Murphy are not the attorneys of record of Henry Davis, and have not been, as such, to institute any suit in this court, or any one of the federal courts of the United States, against Edward Herndon, for the recovery of the property mentioned in the bill filed in this cause; but they, said Dowd and Murphy, are the attorneys of record of Henry Davis to prosecute a suit against said Herndon, is a State court, to wit: the circuit court of Monroe county, in the State of Mississippi.
'W. F. DOWD.'
The district court dismissed the bill, and Herndon appealed to this court.
The case was argued by Mr. Adams, for the appellant, who contended that service upon the attorneys was sufficient; and by Mr. Phillips, for the appellees, who contended that it was not, and referred to 3 Bro. C. C. 521; 2 Cox. 389.
Mr. Justice CAMPBELL delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Herndon v. Howard/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
76 U.S. 664
Herndon v. Howard
The section of the Bankrupt Law relied on, we think, governs the present case. It seems to require that Masterson, the assignee, be substituted as appellant for Herndon, the bankrupt, who may be said to be civiliter mortuus, precisely as an executor or administrator would be made party instead of an appellant actually deceased; and an order will be
MADE ACCORDINGLY.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Herndon v. Ridgway/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
58 U.S. 424
Herndon v. Ridgway
The plaintiff complains that, in 1849, he purchased from James C. Ridgway a number of slaves, for whom he gave his bond to the vendor; that this was transferred to E. T. Ridgway for the use of Wm. H. Gasque, and that a suit is pending in the district court of the United States for that district, to collect the sum due; that the slaves are in the possession of Wm. P. Givan, to whom he sold them with a warranty of the title. That one Davis claims the slaves under a title paramount to that deriver from Ridgway, and had brought a suit for them in the stat court, which had proved ineffective, and now threatens to renew it. The object of the bill is to require the two Ridgways and Gasque, on the one part, and Davis, on the other, to interplead in the district court of the United States, to settle their right to the slaves, so that he may pay the purchase-money to the proper person. He alleges that the vendor, Ridgway, is insolvent.
The four defendants are citizens of Alabama. Notice of the motion for injunction was served on the attorneys for the plaintiff, in the suit in the district court, and upon the attorneys who prosecuted the suit against Givan for Davis in the state court. The attorneys for Davis disclaim any connection with him in this controversy, and move to dismiss the bill for want of jurisdiction. Gasque appears and demurs to the bill for the same cause, and no notice or appearance exists in the record for the vendor, Ridgway. The district court retained the bill twelve months, and then dismissed it on these motions.
The jurisdiction of the district court over parties is acquired only by a service of process, or their voluntary appearance. It has no authority to issue process to another State. In the present case, the absent defendants decline to appear, and process cannot be served, so that the court is without any jurisdiction over the essential parties to the bill. There was no course open to it, except to dismiss it for the want of jurisdiction, upon the motions submitted for that object. Toland v. Sprague, 12 Pet. 300.
There is no error in the record, and the decree is affirmed.
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the district court of the United States for the northern district of Mississippi, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the decree of the said district court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed, with costs.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hero

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Hero."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
"A Hero" and "The Hero" redirect here
* A Hero, a poem by Florence Earle Coates
* A Hero, a children's work by Diana Maria Muloch
* A Hero, a poem by Katharine Tynan
* The Hero, a short story by Margarita Spalding Gerry
* The Hero (1917), a poem by Siegfried Sassoon ('Jack fell as he'd have wished,' the Mother said,)
* The Hero, a poem by Lydia Sigourney
* The Hero, a short story by Rabindranath Tagore
* The Hero, a poem by Henry David Thoreau (What doth he ask?)
* The Hero, a poem by John Greenleaf Whittier (O for a knight like Bayard,)
# Indian Medicinal Plants/Natural Order Malpighiaceæ

N. 0. MALPIGHIACEÆ.
203. Hiptage Madablota, Gaertn. h.f.b.i., i. 418.
Syn.:—Gærtnera racemosa, Roxb. 360.
Sans:—Mâdhavi, Atimuktâ.
Vern.:—Kampti, madmalti; huthee mookta (H.); Endra, chopar, benkar (Pb.); Madhablata (B.); Haladwail, Madhúmâlati, Mâdhavlata, Mâdhavi. (Mar.); Aita-lugala (N. W. P.); Shempati (Nepal); Baromali (Uriya); Mádhavi tige, vadla yárála, potuvadla (Tel.)
Trimen:—(Singhalese) Puwak-gédi.
J. Indraji:—(Porebunder and Gujrat) Rakatpiti, Ragatpiti, Madhavi,
Habitat:—Throughout the hotter parts of India. Ceylon, low country, moist and dry regions.
A large straggling shrub, trunk stout and erect, often of considerable size. Branchlets, young leaves and inflorescence hoary or adpressed-tomentose. Bark brown, thin, exfoliating in small thin flakes. Wood reddish-brown, very rough, soft and moderately hard, with darker patches in the centre (Gamble). Branches stout. Leaves 3-6in., oblong or ovate-lanceolate, acuminate or cordate-acuminate : coriaceous, petioled, shining above. Racemes with densely adpressed pubescence, l-6in., axillary, usually forming a leafy panicle. Flower ½-1in. diam., very fragrant, white. Sepals obtuse. Petals twice as long, fimbriate, the 5th petal dashed with yellow at base. Carpels with a central wing between the 2 lateral. Wings of carpels coriaceous, middle one, one or two inches long, linear-oblong or oblanceolate, the two outer or lateral narrower or shorter, spreading half as long. Seeds subglobose. Cotyledons thick, unequal.
Parts used:—The leaves and bark.
Uses:—The leaves are esteemed useful in cutaneous diseases (Watt).
The bark is a good sub-aromatic bitter (Graham). ​The juice of the leaves is an effectual insecticide and a valuable application in scabies, if rubbed well and frequently over the affected parts (Moodeen Sheriff).
Useful in chronic rheumatism and asthma (Dr. Houston in Watt's Dictionary).
(Improve this image)
# Indian Medicinal Plants/Natural Order Melastomaceæ

N. 0. MELASTOMACEÆ.
509. Memecylon edule, Roxb. h.f.b.l, ii. 563, Roxb. 325.
Vern.:—Limba (Mar.); Limba-toli (Kan.); Kashwa (Mal.); Alli chettu (Tel.); Kayampoovoocheddi, Casari-cheddy, Cashamarum (Tam.); Anjana, Yâlki, Lokhande (Bomb.).
Habitat:—Eastern Peninsula and Ceylon ; very common at Mahabaleshwar and on the Ghauts, less so in S. Concan.
A shrub or small handsome tree. Bark thin, light-brown, corky, narrowly-cleft ventrically. Wood light-brown, very hard, close-grained. Leaves l½-3½in., elliptic or ovate-acute at both ends, hard, acuminate. Secondary nerves more or less obscure ; petiole ⅛-1/5in. Cymes pedunculate, rarely axillary, generally above the scars of fallen leaves. Flowers brilliant blue, in a compact cyme, medium-sized. Calyx-tube at the time of flowering sauce-shaped ; limb truncate ; Calyx sometimes pink. Disk at the apex of the ovary depressed, obscurely-rayed. Berry ¼in.. diam., black-purple, globose, or slightly ovoid, mouth about ⅛in. wide.
Mr. C. B. Clarke mentions 12 varieties of this plant.
Mr. A. K. Nairne, in his " Flowering Plants of "Western India " writes:—"From the mode of growth the flowers look almost as if they were parasitical on the tree. The colors blend in a lovely manner, and a poetical forest officer aptly described them to me as forming 'globes of pink and blue and white, like living opals'."
Parts used:—The leaves and root.
Use:—The leaves are used as a cooling astringent; used in conjunctivitis as a lotion; and, given internally in leucorrhœa and gonorrhœa, they should be bruised in a mortar and infused in boiling water. Dr. Peters found them in use in Belgaum as a remedy for gonorrhœa of considerable reputation. In the Concan, the bark, with equal proportion of cocoanut kernel, ajwan seeds, yellow zedoary and black pepper, is powdered and ​tied up in a cloth for fomentation or applied as a lep to bruises (Dymock). The root in decoction is considered very beneficial in excessive menstrual discharge (Drury).
(Improve this image)
# Helvering v. Mitchell

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
303 U.S. 391
Helvering v. Mitchell
Argued: Jan. 14, 1938. --- Decided: March 7, 1938
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Edward S. Greenbaum, of New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. William Wallace, of New York City, for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 392-394 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Minnesota Tea Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
296 U.S. 378
Helvering v. Minnesota Tea Company
Argued: Nov. 19, 20, 1935. --- Decided: Dec 16, 1935
The Attorney General and Mr. J. Louis Monarch, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Homer Hendricks, of Washington, D.C., for respondent Minnesota Tea Co.
Mr. James G. Nye, of Duluth, Minn., for respondents Peterson.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Morgan's Inc.

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
293 U.S. 121
Helvering v. Morgan's Inc.
No. 12 Argued: Oct. 11, 12, 1934. --- Decided: Nov 5, 1934
The Attorney General and Mr. H. Brian Holland, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.
Messrs. Lawrence E. Green and Haskell Cohn, both of Boston, Mass., for respondents.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Mountain Producers Corporation

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
303 U.S. 376
Helvering v. Mountain Producers Corporation
Argued: Feb. 10, 1938. --- Decided: March 7, 1938
[Syllabus from pages 376-378 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Golden W. Bell, Asst. Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Harold D. Roberts, of Denver, Colo., for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. National Grocery Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
304 U.S. 282
Helvering v. National Grocery Company
Argued: April 8-11, 1938. --- Decided: May 16, 1938
Messrs. James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Webster Atwell, of Dallas Tex., for petitioner.
Mr. J. D. Carpenter, Jr., of Jersey City, N.J., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse