OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Schooner Freeman v. Buckingham

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
59 U.S. 182
Schooner Freeman v. Buckingham
THIS was an appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the northern district of New York.
The case is stated in the opinion of the court. would be estopped, in favor of a bon a fide for the appellant, and Mr. Ganson, for the appellee.
Mr. Haven made the following points:--
1. Hickox, the claimant, was the owner of the schooner Freeman. He agreed to sell her to John Holmes for $4,500, payable in five instalments, at various times from June, 1851, to December, 1853. And on such payments being made, and other conditions complied with, he agreed to give John Holmes a good and sufficient bill of sale of her, &c. By this agreement, the property of the claimant in the schooner was not devested. Hilliard on Sales, title 'Conditional Sales,' pp. 18-23; Barrett v. Pritchard, 2 Pick. 512; Ayer v. Bartlett, 9 Pick. 156; West v. Bolton, 4 Verm. Rep. 558; Herring v. Willard, 2 Sandf. Sup. Ct. Rep. 418.
Mem.-Kent, in his Commentaries, (vol. ii. p. 497,) says: 'When there is a condition precedent attached to a contract of sale and delivery, the property does not vest in the vendee on delivery, until the performance of the condition, or the seller waives it; and the right continues in the vendor, even against the creditors of the vendee.'
He cites Strong v. Taylor, 2 Hill, 326, which is in point, and was decided by Justice Nelson.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 5

V.
Those hours, that with gentle work did frame The lovely gaze where every eye doth dwell, Will play the tyrants to the very same And that unfair which fairly doth excel; For never-resting time leads summer on To hideous winter and confounds him there; Sap check'd with frost, and lusty leaves quite gone, Beauty o'ersnow'd and bareness every where: Then, were not summer's distillation left, A liquid prisoner pent in walls of glass, Beauty's effect with beauty were bereft, Nor it nor no remembrance what it was: But flowers distill'd, though they with winter meet, Leese but their show; their substance still lives sweet.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 48

XLVIII.
How careful was I when I took my way, Each trifle under truest bars to thrust, That to my use it might unused stay From hands of falsehood, in sure wards of trust! But thou, to whom my jewels trifles are, Most worthy comfort, now my greatest grief, Thou best of dearest, and mine only care, Art left the prey of every vulgar thief. Thee have I not lock'd up in any chest, Save where thou art not, though I feel thou art, Within the gentle closure of my breast, From whence at pleasure thou mayst come and part; And even thence thou wilt be stol'n I fear, For truth proves thievish for a prize so dear.
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 49

XLIX.
Against that time, if ever that time come, When I shall see thee frown on my defects, When as thy love hath cast his utmost sum, Call'd to that audit by advis'd respects; Against that time when thou shalt strangely pass, And scarcely greet me with that sun, thine eye, When love, converted from the thing it was, Shall reasons find of settled gravity; Against that time do I ensconce me here, Within the knowledge of mine own desert, And this my hand, against my self uprear, To guard the lawful reasons on thy part: To leave poor me thou hast the strength of laws, Since why to love I can allege no cause.
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 50

L.
How heavy do I journey on the way, When what I seek, my weary travel's end, Doth teach that ease and that repose to say, 'Thus far the miles are measur'd from thy friend!' The beast that bears me, tired with my woe, Plods dully on, to bear that weight in me, As if by some instinct the wretch did know His rider lov'd not speed, being made from thee: The bloody spur cannot provoke him on, That sometimes anger thrusts into his hide; Which heavily he answers with a groan, More sharp to me than spurring to his side; For that same groan doth put this in my mind,— My grief lies onward and my joy behind.
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 44

XLIV.
If the dull substance of my flesh were thought, Injurious distance should not stop my way; For then despite of space I would be brought, From limits far remote, where thou dost stay. No matter then although my foot did stand Upon the farthest earth remov'd from thee; For nimble thought can jump both sea and land, As soon as think the place where he would be. But, ah! thought kills me that I am not thought, To leap large lengths of miles when thou art gone, But that so much of earth and water wrought, I must attend, time's leisure with my moan; Receiving nought by elements so slow But heavy tears, badges of either's woe.
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 46

XLVI.
Mine eye and heart are at a mortal war, How to divide the conquest of thy sight; Mine eye my heart thy picture's sight would bar, My heart mine eye the freedom of that right. My heart doth plead that thou in him dost lie,— A closet never pierc'd with crystal eyes— But the defendant doth that plea deny, And says in him thy fair appearance lies. To 'cide this title is impannelled A quest of thoughts, all tenants to the heart; And by their verdict is determined The clear eye's moiety, and the dear heart's part: As thus; mine eye's due is thy outward part, And my heart's right, thy inward love of heart.
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 47

XLVII.
Betwixt mine eye and heart a league is took, And each doth good turns now unto the other: When that mine eye is famish'd for a look, Or heart in love with sighs himself doth smother, With my love's picture then my eye doth feast, And to the painted banquet bids my heart; Another time mine eye is my heart's guest, And in his thoughts of love doth share a part: So, either by thy picture or my love, Thy self away, art present still with me; For thou not farther than my thoughts canst move, And I am still with them, and they with thee; Or, if they sleep, thy picture in my sight Awakes my heart, to heart's and eye's delight.
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 43

XLIII.
When most I wink, then do mine eyes best see, For all the day they view things unrespected; But when I sleep, in dreams they look on thee, And darkly bright are bright in dark directed. Then thou, whose shadow shadows doth make bright, How would thy shadow's form form happy show To the clear day with thy much clearer light, When to unseeing eyes thy shade shines so! How would, I say, mine eyes be blessed made By looking on thee in the living day, When in dead night thy fair imperfect shade Through heavy sleep on sightless eyes doth stay! All days are nights to see till I see thee, And nights bright days when dreams do show thee me.
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 45

XLV.
The other two, slight air, and purging fire Are both with thee, wherever I abide; The first my thought, the other my desire, These present-absent with swift motion slide. For when these quicker elements are gone In tender embassy of love to thee, My life, being made of four, with two alone Sinks down to death, oppress'd with melancholy; Until life's composition be recur'd By those swift messengers return'd from thee, Who even but now come back again, assur'd, Of thy fair health, recounting it to me: This told, I joy; but then no longer glad, I send them back again, and straight grow sad.
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 51

LI.
Thus can my love excuse the slow offence
Of my dull bearer when from thee I speed:
From where thou art why should I haste me thence?
Till I return, of posting is no need.
O, what excuse will my poor beast then find,
When swift extremity can seem but slow?
Then should I spur, though mounted on the wind;
In winged speed no motion shall I know:
Then can no horse with my desire keep pace;
Therefore desire, of perfect'st love being made,
Shall neigh—no dull flesh—in his fiery race;
But love, for love, thus shall excuse my jade: Since from thee going he went wilful-slow, Towards thee I'll run, and give him leave to go.
# Scientists' Institute for Public Information, Inc. v. Atomic Energy Commission

* related portals: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
* 481 F.2d 1079
* SCIENTISTS' INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION, INC., APPELLANT
* v.
* ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION ET AL.
* No. 72-1331
* United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
* June 12, 1973, Decided
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
J. G. Speth, with whom Ronald J. Wilson was on the brief, for Appellant.
Edmund B. Clark, Attorney, Department of Justice, with whom Assistant Attorney General Kent Frizzell and Martin R. Hoffman, General Counsel, Atomic Energy Commission, Jerome Nelson, Solicitor, Atomic Energy Commission, and Thomas L. McKevitt and Peter R. Steenland, Attorneys, Department of Justice, were on the brief, for Appellees.
John D. Hoffman filed a brief on behalf of Sierra Club and Committee for Nuclear Responsibility, Inc. as Amici Curiae urging reversal.
Bazelon, Chief Judge, and Wright and Wilkey, Circuit Judges.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sclater

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Sclater."
* sister projects: taxonomy, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Sclater, Edward
* Sclater, William (1575-1626)
* Sclater, William (d.1646). See under Slayter, William
* Sclater, William (1609-1661). See under Sclater, William (1575-1626)
* Sclater, William (d.1717?)
* Sclater-Booth, George
see also: Sclater, Philip Lutley (1829-1913)
# Readout from NSC Spokesperson Emily Horne on National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan Leading the First Virtual Meeting of the U.S.–Israel Strategic Consultative Group

Published 2021-03-11
National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan led an interagency U.S. delegation’s participation in a virtual meeting of the U.S.–Israel Strategic Consultative Group on March 11. The Israeli interagency delegation was led by National Security Advisor Meir Ben-Shabbat. During the discussion, the two sides shared perspectives on regional security issues of mutual interest and concern, including Iran, and expressed their common determination to confront the challenges and threats facing the region. The National Security Advisors agreed on the importance of strategic interagency consultations and pledged to continue to these engagements. This meeting is part of the broader ongoing dialogue between the United States and Israel on the full range of issues of importance to the bilateral relationship.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Reading the Will

Here we have it, scratched and scored By the tides of an impotent human soul; He that wrote it died abhorred, And scarcely the bell had ceased to toll Ere they crowded together over the cake, Ferret-eyed women and keen-faced men, In the putrid well of his life to slake Their viperous throats, and wonder when The lawyer was coming to give their share— Waiting like beasts behind the bars For the meat apportioned,—and all the air Thick with the hissing whisper that mars Fame of the living and fame of the dead. See that woman, her yellow teeth Pressing the lip's thin line of red; Mark the struggle that lies beneath The outer surface of weepers and veils! She was his housekeeper, people muttered Hints, half-hinting, and half-heard tales, Poison tipping each syllable uttered. Charity, this! And the dead man lies Still? Impossible! He must stir, Slip the bandages, turn and rise, Speak, refuting the blot on her! There is no sign. Does he hear them say She has it all, and "We know how She wiled it from him, but let us stay To hear the reading—it's coming now"? Slowly, slowly, the red seals break. Watch them, marking his ev'ry word— How in life he had willed to make This one wretched, and that preferred. "I will and I choose that such a one Should have my all!" O woe, O woe! Human potency, what has it done To help men's souls in the shades below? Does he remember his power past, How that he made men smile or weep,— Helpless to hold his riches fast, Fighting with blows men strike in sleep?
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published in 1881, before the cutoff of January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1936, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 87 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Readout from NSC Spokesperson Emily Horne on National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan Leading a Virtual Meeting of the U.S.-Israel Strategic Consultative Group

Published 2021-04-13
National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan led U.S. participation in a virtual meeting of the U.S.-Israel Strategic Consultative Group on April 13. This meeting was held as part of ongoing bilateral consultations on security issues of vital importance to the two countries. During the meeting, officials consulted in detail on opportunities to promote stability and security in the face of shared regional threats and challenges. Mr. Sullivan reaffirmed the Biden-Harris administration’s unwavering commitment to Israel’s security and to ensuring that Iran will never obtain a nuclear weapon. The officials expressed their shared interest in maintaining a close and open dialogue in the months ahead. Mr. Sullivan warmly invited his Israeli counterpart, Meir Ben-Shabbat, to visit Washington before the end of this month for follow-up consultations.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Shakespeare of Stratford/The Biographical Facts/Fact 5

Layout 2
New Haven: Yale University Press, pages 7–9
​V. MENTION OF SHAKESPEARE AS HEIR OF JOHN AND MARY SHAKESPEARE IN SUIT OVER THE ESTATE OF ASBIES (1589).
From Coram Rege Roll, Public Record Office, London.
In 1579 John and Mary Shakespeare alienated to Edmund Lambert, brother-in-law of Mary, for forty pounds, the estate of Asbies, three miles from Stratford, an inheritance from Mary’s father, Robert Arden. There appears to have been an informal agreement for recovery of the estate on repayment of the sum; but Edmund and after him his son, John Lambert, refused to acknowledge this. In Michaelmas term (autumn), 1589, John Shakespeare brought suit against John Lambert, asserting that on Edmund Lambert’s death in 1587, John Lambert contracted to pay twenty pounds on condition that the Shakespeares should not bring suit against him and should confirm him in the possession of the estate. The por​tion of the document mentioning William Shakespeare is as follows:
Et quod dictus Johannes Shackespere et Maria uxor ejus, simul cum Willielmo Shackespere filio suo, cum inde requisiti essent, assurarent mesuagium predictum et cetera premissa, cum pertinentiis, prefato Johanni Lamberte, et deliberarent omnia scripta et evidencias premissa predicta concernentia; predictus Johannes Lamberte vicesimo sexto die Septembris anno regni dicte domine regine vicesimo nono, apud Stratford-super-Avon in comitatu predicto, in consideracione inde super se assumpsit et prefato Johanni Shackespere, adtunc et ibidem fideliter promisit quod ipse, idem Johannes Lambert, viginti libras legalis monete Anglie prefato Johanni Shackespere . . . bene et fideliter solvere et contentare vellet; et predictus Johannes Shackespere in facto dicit quod ipse hucusque non implacitavit dictum Johannem Lambert pro premissis, nec aliqua inde parcella, et insuper quod ipse, idem Johannes Shackespere et Maria uxor ejus, simul cum Willielmo Shackespere filio suo semper hactenus parati fuerunt tam ad assurandum premissa predicta quam ad deliberandum eidem Johanni Lamberte omnia scripta et evidencias eadem premissa concernentia; predictus tamen Johannes Lamberte, promissionem et assumpcionem suas predictas minime curans, sed machinans et fraudulenter intendens ipsum Johannem Shackespere de predictis viginti libris callide et subdole decipere et defraudare, easdem viginti libras prefato Johanni Shackespere juxta promissionem et assumpcionem suas hucusque non solvit. . . .
Note. Nothing seems to have been effected by this suit, in which the poet was only indirectly concerned. Eight years later (Nov. 24, 1597) a chancery suit against Lambert was instituted in the name of John and Mary Shakespeare, but doubtless at the expense of the poet, who however is not mentioned. The case dragged on for several years without profit to the Shakespeares. The documents are given by Halliwell-Phillipps, Outlines, 7th ed., ii. 14 ff.
Footnotes
# Shakespeare of Stratford/The Biographical Facts/Fact 50

Layout 2
New Haven: Yale University Press, pages 57–59
​L. SHAKESPEARE’S SUIT AGAINST JOHN ADDENBROOKE OF STRATFORD (1608–1609).
Series of seven legal papers in Latin dealing with Shakespeare’s proceedings against Addenbrooke for ​recovery of a debt of £6 in the Stratford court. (Stratford Court of Record.)
(A) Aug. 17, 1608. Warrant to the officers of the court to bring the body of Johannem Addenbrooke, generosum, into the next court of record, ad respondendum Willielmo Shackspeare, generoso, de placito debiti. Endorsed: Virtute istius precepti cepi infranominatum Johannem, cujus corpus paratum habeo prout interius mihi precipitur. Manucaptor pro defendente, Thomas Hornebye. Gilbertus Charnock, serviens.
(B,C) December 21, 1608. Papers relating to summons of jurymen to try the case of Shakespeare vs. Addenbrooke.
(D,E) February 15, 1609. Note that the jurors decide in favor of the plaintiff.
(F) March 15, 1609. Order citing John Addenbrooke before the next court of record ad satisfaciendum Willielmo Shackspeare, generoso, tam de sex libris debiti quas predictus Willielmus in eadem curia versus eum recuperavit quam de viginti et quattuor solidis qui ei adjudicati fuerunt pro dampnis et custagiis suis quos sustinuit occasione detentionis debiti predicti. Endorsed: Infranominatus Johannes non ​est inventus infra libertatem hujus burgi. Franciscus Boyce, serviens.
(G) June 7, 1609. Order issued against Thomas Horneby to show cause why he should not, as surety for the defaulting Addenbrooke, pay Shakespeare the six pounds and twenty-four shillings which the court had awarded to the latter. Endorsement showing that the notice has been served on Horneby.
* ↑ These documents are given in full by Halliwell-Phillipps, Outlines, 7th ed., ii. 78–80.
* ↑ ‘To answer William Shackspeare, gentleman, in an action for debt.’
* ↑ ‘By virtue of this order I arrested the below-named John, whose body I hold ready as is commanded to me within. Surety for the defendant, Thomas Hornebye. (Signed) Gilbert Charnock, process-server.’
* ↑ ‘To satisfy William Shackspeare, gentleman, both for the six pounds of debt which the aforesaid William recovered against him in the same court and also for the twenty-four shillings which were decreed to him for his damages and injuries which he sustained by reason of the detention of the aforesaid debt.’
* ↑ ‘The below-named John has not been found within the liberties of this borough.’
Footnotes
# Sarno v. Illinois Crime Commission

Supreme Court of the United States
406 U.S. 482
Sarno et al. v. Illinois Crime Investigating Commission
Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois
No. 70-7. Argued: January 11, 1972. --- Decided: May 22, 1972.
Since neither party contends that the scope of Illinois statutory immunity falls below the use and derivative use standard held to be coextensive with the privilege against self-incrimination in Kastigar v. United States, ante, p. 441, any uncertainty regarding the scope of protection in excess of the constitutional requirement should best be left to the Illinois courts.
45 Ill. 2d 473, 259 N.E. 2d 267, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.
Frank G. Whalen argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners.
Joel M. Flaum, First Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were William J. Scott, Attorney General, and Jayne A. Carr, Assistant Attorney General.
Melvin L. Wulf filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union as amicus curiae urging reversal.
PER CURIAM.
# Sartor Resartus

* Original serial in Fraser's Magazine for Town and Country
* Sartor Resartus (Centenary Edition) (1896)
* Sartor Resartus in Sartor Resartus and On Heroes, Hero-Worship and the Heroic in History (1901)
# Sark Order in Council 1675

* related portals: Constitutional documents, Channel Islands, United Kingdom.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
The Order in Council of, 19 May 1675, which suspended of the Sark Court and the Office of Seneschal.
19th MAY 1675
CHARLES REX:
Trusty and well beloved we greet you well, whereas it hath been represented unto us by our truly and well beloved Sir Philippe de Carteret, Baronet, Lord of the Island of Sark, that the Jurats of the said Island having refused to take the oaths and subscribe to the declaration and receive the sacrement of the Lords Supper in such a manner as by law is directed, you the Bailiff and Jurats of our Court of our Island of Guernsey have according to the Act Parliament in that behalf made and provided, taken from them their civil authority. AND whereas the rest of the inhabitants are poor and illiterate or so averse to the laws of the Church of England as to become incapable of becoming magistrates in the said Isle and thereby the said Island hath remained for above a year without any administration of Civil Justice to the great prejudice of our subjects there:
We have thought fit and do hereby order and direct, that you the Bailiff and Jurats of our said Court of Guernsey do give oath to a Seneschal and establish such other Officers as shall be requisite for the administration of the Civil Justice there and who shall be named by the said Sir Philippe de Carteret in like manner as the said Sir Philippe doth at St. Ouen in Jersey and other Lords of the Island of Jersey and Guernsey do appoint in their respective Manors and Fees in the said Isles and for so doing this shall be your warrant and so we bid you farewell.
GIVEN at our Court at Whitehall the nineteenth day of May, One thousand six hundred and seventy five in the seven and twentieth year of our reign.
Signed by his Majesty's Command,.
This work is in the public domain worldwide because it was created by a public body of the United Kingdom with Crown Status and commercially published before 1974.
See Crown copyright artistic works, Crown copyright non-artistic works and List of Public Bodies with Crown Status.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse