OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Ancient concert

Ancient concert. A society, established in London, for the purpose of preserving music which, in the fashionable world, is called ancient. They gave concerts, at which were performed the masterpieces of Pergolese, Leo, Durante. Marcello, and Scarlatti; in a word, they performed the music of that constellation of distinguished men, who appeared, almost at the same time, about the year 1730. It is certainly unwise to neglect the productions of genius, to whatever period they may belong. Yet, as music, like every other branch of art and knowledge, is progressive, it cannot surely be expedient constantly to refer to the works of our forefathers, as did this society, for the only models of excellence.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Anche

Anche. (F.) Literally, a tube, or pipe; a reed. Any instruments with reeds come under this name, as melodeons, seraphines, clarinets, hautboys, or bassoons ; also the reed, or mouth-piece of the oboe, clarinet, &c.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Ancient flat signatures

Ancient flat signatures. The objection to the sharp signatures dims not apply to the flat, since the second of their minor modes is not affected by the flat. For this reason, and from the variable nature of the sixth, or submediant, in the minor scale, the ancient list signatures are very frequently found. The signature of one flat belongs to 11 flat major and G minor. The following ex-ample in the opening of Corellli's fifth concerto is in B flat major.
This example affords a very striking instance of the use and effect of harmony in deciding the key and mode, independent of the signature. The eighth concerto of Corelli opens with this signature in G minor, as in the following example
This also depends upon harmony for the decision of its key and mode; the melody, as it stands above, might he equally in B flat major, or G minor; but the F sharp, which accompanies the C in the second measure, decides the key. The signature of two flats be-bugs to E flat major, as
The signature of its relative, minor mode C, is very common.
The signature of three flats is unusual in the major mode of A flat, but extremely frequent in the minor of F. Handel, indeed, has seldom if ever. used the modern signature in this mode.
In the above example, the E natural is the leading note, and points to the key note, F ; of which A fiat is the lesser third, and decides the mode.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Anastatius

Anastatius. A modern Greek composer and violinist, in the service of the sultan at Constantinople, about the year 1786.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Anaxenor

Anaxenor, a famous performer on the lute, lived about forty years before Jesus Christ. Mark Antony gave him guards, and the revenues of four towns.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Analyze

Analyze. To separate a piece of music into its parts or chords, for the purpose of examining each chord or note separately, and ascertaining how they are placed together - a very good exercise for the musical student.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Anapest

Anapest. A musical foot, containing two short and one long notes. This mark of rhythm, or accent, may be represented by the words contravene, acquiesce; in notes, thus : -
# Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Leitch

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
275 U.S. 507
Chesapeake Ohio Railway Company v. Leitch
Mr. Douglas W. Brown, of Huntington, W. Va., for petitioner.
Mr. Jonn H. Holt, of Huntington, W. Va., for respondent.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. McLaughlin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
242 U.S. 142
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. McLaughlin
Argued: November 14, 1916. --- Decided: December 4, 1916
Messrs. F. B. Enslow and Herbert Fitzpatrick for plaintiff in error.
No appearance for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McReynolds delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. McDonald

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
214 U.S. 191
Chesapeake Ohio Railway Company v. McDonald
Argued: April 19, 1909. --- Decided: May 17, 1909
Messrs. E. L. Worthington, W. H. Wadsworth, W. D. Cochran, and LeWright Browning for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Allan D. Cole, T. R. Phister, R. D. Wilson, and W. T. Cole for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Leitch/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
275 U.S. 507
Chesapeake Ohio Railway Company v. Leitch
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of West Virginia in this case is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Congressional Record/Volume 167/Issue 4/Senate/Counting of Electoral Ballots/Arizona Objection Debate/Booker Speech

​Mr. Booker. Mr. Vice President, I can only think of two times in American history that individuals laid siege to our Capitol, stormed our sacred civic spaces, and tried to upend and overrun this government. One was in the War of 1812, and the other one was today.
What is interesting about the parallel between the two is they both were waving flags to a sole sovereign, to an individual, surrendering democratic principles to the cult of personality. One was a monarch in England, and the other were the flags I saw all over our Capitol, including in the hallways and in this room, to a single person named Donald Trump.
The sad difference between these two times is one was yet another nation in the history of our country that tried to challenge the United States of America, but this time, we brought this hell upon ourselves.
My colleague from Texas said that this was a moment where there were unprecedented allegations of voter fraud. Yes, that is true. They were unprecedented when the President, before the election even happened, said: If I lose this election, then the election was rigged.
That is unprecedented. It is unprecedented that, before the night of the counting of the vote was even done, that he called it rigged. It is unprecedented that he is fanning the flames of conspiracy theory to create a smokescreen in this Nation to cover what he is trying to do, which is undermine our democratic principles.
But it is not just that. The shame of this day is it is being aided and abetted by good Americans who are falling prey, who are choosing Trump over truth, who are surrendering to the passion of lies as opposed to standing up and speaking truth to power, who are trying to fundraise off of the shame of conspiracy theories as opposed to doing the incalculably valuable, patriotic thing: to speak truth to our Nation. Our democracy is wounded, and I saw it when I saw pictures of yet another insurgency, of a flag of another group of Americans who tried to challenge our Nation. I saw the flag of the Confederacy there.
What will we do? How will we confront this shame? How will we confront this dark second time in American history? I pray that we remember a Georgian and his words. All I can say is we must, in spirit, join together like those Georgians on a bridge called the Edmund Pettus, who joined hands, who were called threats to our democracy, who were called outrageous epithets when they sought to expand our democracy, to save it, to heal it—when they joined arm in arm and said what we should say now, commit ourselves to that ideal, that together, we shall overcome.
(Applause.)
# Clancy of the Overflow

I had written him a letter which I had, for want of better, Knowledge, sent to where I met him down the Lachlan, years ago, He was shearing when I knew him, so I sent the letter to him, Just on spec, addressed as follows, “Clancy, of The Overflow”.   And an answer came directed in a writing unexpected, (And I think the same was written with a thumb-nail dipped in tar) ’Twas his shearing mate who wrote it, and verbatim I will quote it: “Clancy’s gone to Queensland droving, and we don’t know where he are.”
In my wild erratic fancy visions come to me of Clancy Gone a-droving “down the Cooper” where the Western drovers go; As the stock are slowly stringing, Clancy rides behind them singing, For the drover’s life has pleasures that the townsfolk never know.
And the bush hath friends to meet him, and their kindly voices greet him In the murmur of the breezes and the river on its bars, And he sees the vision splendid of the sunlit plains extended, And at night the wond’rous glory of the everlasting stars.
I am sitting in my dingy little office, where a stingy Ray of sunlight struggles feebly down between the houses tall, And the foetid air and gritty of the dusty, dirty city Through the open window floating, spreads its foulness over all.
And in place of lowing cattle, I can hear the fiendish rattle Of the tramways and the buses making hurry down the street, And the language uninviting of the gutter children fighting, Comes fitfully and faintly through the ceaseless tramp of feet.
And the hurrying people daunt me, and their pallid faces haunt me As they shoulder one another in their rush and nervous haste, With their eager eyes and greedy, and their stunted forms and weedy, For townsfolk have no time to grow, they have no time to waste.
And I somehow rather fancy that I’d like to change with Clancy, Like to take a turn at droving where the seasons come and go, While he faced the round eternal of the cash-book and the journal — But I doubt he’d suit the office, Clancy, of The Overflow.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1941, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 82 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Clallam County Wash v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
263 U.S. 341
Clallam County Wash v. United States
Argued: Nov. 15, 1923. --- Decided: Nov 26, 1923
Messrs. Thomas F. Trumbull, of Port Angeles, Wash., and John D. Fletcher and S. Warburton, both of Tacoma, Wash., for Clallam County.
Mr. Solicitor General Beck, of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Clancy v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Clark
United States Supreme Court
365 U.S. 312
Clancy v. United States
Argued: Jan. 10, 1961. --- Decided: Feb 27, 1961
Messrs. Paul P. Waller, Jr., and John F. O'Connell, East St. Louis, Ill., for petitioners.
Mr. Daniel M. Friedman, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Clap Your Hands, Ye People All

Clap your hands, ye people all, Praise the God on Whom ye call; Lift your voice, and shout His praise, Triumph in His sovereign grace!
Glorious is the Lord most High, Terrible in majesty; He His sovereign sway maintains, King o’er all the earth He reigns.
Jesus is gone up on high, Takes His seat above the sky: Shout the angel-choirs aloud, Echoing to the trump of God.
Sons of earth, the triumph join, Praise Him with the host divine; Emulate the heavenly powers, Their victorious Lord is ours.
Shout the God enthroned above, Trumpet forth His conquering love; Praises to our Jesus sing, Praises to our glorious King!
Power is all to Jesus given, Power o’er hell, and earth, and Heav’n! Power He now to us imparts; Praise Him with believing hearts.
Wonderful in saving power, Him let all our hearts adore; Earth and Heav’n repeat the cry, “Glory be to God most High!”
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Clapp v. Mason

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
94 U.S. 589
Clapp v. Mason
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Assistant Attorney-General Smith for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. George Putnam, Jr., contra.
MR. JUSTICE HUNT delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Clancy of the Mounted Police

Collected in Ballads of a Cheechako

### Clancy of the Mounted Police

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1958, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 65 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Communications Workers of America

United States Supreme Court
362 U.S. 479
Communications Workers of America
AFL-CIO, Petitioners,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.
No. 418.
Argued April 18, 1960.
Decided May 2, 1960.
Mr. J. R. Goldthwaite, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for petitioners.
Mr. Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Communication From the Honorable Barack Obama

2008 Congressional Record, Vol. 154, Page S10609
COMMUNICATION FROM THE HONORABLE BARACK OBAMA
The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Chair lays a communication before the Senate.
The legislative clerk read as follows:
U.S. Senate,
Washington, DC, November 18, 2008.
Hon. Richard Cheney,
Vice President of the United States of America, President of the U.S. Senate, U.S. Capitol, Washington, DC.
Dear Vice President Cheney, President of the U.S. Senate: This letter is to inform you that I resigned from the United States Senate, effective November 16, 2008, in order to prepare for my duties as President of the United States.
    Sincerely,
Barack Obama,
U.S. Senator.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Communication On The Wireless Negotiations With Béla Kun

* Recorded: End of March 1919; Published according to the gramophone records
* Translated: George Hanna
* Source: http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1919/mar/x05.htm
I knew Comrade Béla Kun very well when he was still a prisoner of war in Russia; and he visited me many times to discuss communism and the communist revolution. Therefore, when news of the Hungarian communist revolution was received, and in a communication signed by Comrade Béla Kun at that, we wanted to speak to him and ascertain exactly how the revolution stood. The first communication we received about it gave us some grounds for fearing that, perhaps, the so-called socialists, traitor-socialists, had resorted to some deception, had got round the Communists, the more so that the latter were in prison. And so, the day after the first communication about the Hungarian revolution was received, I sent a wireless message to Budapest, asking Béla Kun to come to the apparatus, and I put a number of questions to him of such a nature as to enable me to make sure that it was really he who was speaking. I asked him what real guarantees there were for the character of the government and for its actual policy. Comrade Béla Kun’s reply was quite satisfactory and dispelled all our doubts. It appears that the Left Socialists had visited Béla Kun in prison to consult him about forming a government. And it was only these Left Socialists, who sympathised with the Communists, and also people from the Centre who formed the new government, while the Right Socialists, the traitorsocialists, the irreconcilables and incorrigibles, so to speak, left the Party, and not a single worker followed them. Later communications showed that the policy of the Hungarian Government was most firm and so Communist in trend that ‘while we began with workers’ control of industry and only gradually began to socialise industry, Béla Kun, with his prestige, his conviction that he was backed by vast masses, could at once pass a law which converted all the industrial undertakings in Hungary that were run on capitalist lines into public property. Two days later we became fully convinced that the Hungarian revolution had at once, with extraordinary rapidity, taken the communist road. The bourgeoisie voluntarily surrendered power to the Communists of Hungary. The bourgeoisie demonstrated to the whole world that when a grave crisis supervenes, when the nation is in danger, the bourgeoisie is unable to govern. And there is only one government that is really a popular government, a government that is really beloved of the people-the government of the Soviets of Workers’, Soldiers’ and Peasants’ Deputies.
Long live Soviet power in Hungary!
# Coney v. Winchell

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
116 U.S. 227
Coney v. Winchell
Argued: January 4, 1886. ---
S. E. Baldwin and John W. Whiting, for appellants.
John W. Alling, for appellee.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Conditor alme siderum

* related portals: Hymns.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
Also Creator alme siderum; 7th century. "This hymn is sometimes ascribed to St. Ambrose, but on insufficient evidence. It was rejected as such by the Benedictine editors; and with this the best authorities agree. It is known in various forms." —"Conditor (Creator) alme siderum," in A Dictionary of Hymnology, (ed.) by John Julian (1892).
English-language translations of Conditor alme siderum include:
* "Creator Alme Siderum" (Creator of the circling stars) by John Stanley Tute (1847), translated from Urban VIII's revised version in the Roman Breviary of 1632.
* "Creator of the starry frame" by Edward Caswall (1849), also translated from the 1632 revised version.
* "Creator of the stars of night" by John Mason Neale (1851), also translated from the 1632 revised version.
# Conditional pardon of convict John Flood

Conditional Pardon
Whereas Reg. No. 9735 John Flood was convicted of treason felony at Dublin in Ireland in the month of April one thousand eight hundred and sixty seven, and sentenced to fifteen years Penal Servitude.
And whereas Her Most Gracious Majesty Queen Victoria issued a warrant under Her Sign Manual and Signet, given at the Court of St. James's on the Twenty Ninth day of December one thousand eight hundred and seventy in the thirty fourth year of Her Reign and directed to the Governor of Her Majesty's Territory of Western Australia, Whereby Her Said Majesty was graciously pleased to grant to the said John Flood a Pardon for the crime of which he stands convicted on condition that the said John Flood shall not return to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland during the remainder of the said abovementioned term of Penal Servitude.
Now I Frederick Aloysius Weld, Governor and Commander in Chief of the Territory of Western Australia aforesaid, do hereby certify and make known to whom all it may concern that the said John Flood has become entitled to abovementioned Conditional Pardon of Her Most Gracious Majesty Queen Victoria.
Given under my Hand and the Public Seal of the said territory at Government House Perth, this thirteenth day of March in the year of our Lord, one thousand eight hundred and seventy one.
Fred A. Weld
Governor and Commander in Chief.
# Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
330 U.S. 212
Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Company
Argued: Feb. 3, 1947. --- Decided: March 3, 1947
Motion to Amend Mandate Denied June 16, 1947. See 331 U.S. 794, 67 S.Ct. 1725.
Messrs. H. Wayne Unger, of Walterboro, S.C., and James P. Mozingo, of Darlington, S.C., for petitioner.
Messrs. Christie Benet, of Columbia, S.C., and Charles W. Waring of Charleston, S.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Corliss v. Bowers

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
281 U.S. 376
Corliss v. Bowers
Argued: April 15, 16, 1930. --- Decided: April 28, 1930
Mr. Joseph M. Hartfield, of New York City, for petitioner.
The Attorney General and Mr. Charles E. Hughes, Jr., Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Corn Exchange Bank v. Coler

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
280 U.S. 218
Corn Exchange Bank v. Coler
Argued: Nov. 27, 1929. --- Decided: Jan 6, 1930
Mr. Spotswood D. Bowers, of New York City, for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from page 219 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. J. Joseph Lilly and George P. Nicholson, both of New York City, for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from page 220 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Corn Exchange National Bank Trust Company Philadelphia v. Klauder

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
318 U.S. 434
Corn Exchange National Bank Trust Company Philadelphia v. Klauder
Argued: Feb. 2, 3, 1943. --- Decided: March 8, 1943
Mr. Charles J. Biddle, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioners.
Mr. Bertram Bennett, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse