OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# From the Founding of the City/Book 14

translated by Daniel Spillan and Cyrus Edmonds, 1868
Pyrrhus crosses over into Sicily. [Y. R. 475. B. C. 277.] Many prodigies, among which, the statue of Jupiter in the Capitol is struck by lightning, and thrown down. [Y. R. 476. B. C. 276.] The head of it afterwards found by the priests. Curius Dentatus, holding a levy, puts up to sale the goods of a person who refuses to answer to his name when called upon. [Y. R. 477. B. C. 275.] Pyrrhus, after his return from Sicily, is defeated, and compelled to quit Italy. The censors hold a lustrum, and find the number of the citizens to be two hundred and seventy-one thousand two hundred and twenty-four. [Y. R. 479. B. c. 273.] A treaty of alliance formed with Ptolemy, king of Egypt. Sextilia, a vestal, found guilty of incest, and buried alive. Two colonies sent forth, to Posidonium and Cossa. [Y. R. 480. B. C. 272.] A Carthaginian fleet sails, in aid of the Tarentines, by which act the treaty is violated. Successful operations against the Lucanians, Samnites, and Bruttians. Death of king Pyrrhus.
# From the Founding of the City/Book 16

translated by Daniel Spillan and Cyrus Edmonds, 1868
[Y. R. 488. B. C. 264.] Origin and progress of the Carthaginian state. After much debate, the senate resolves to succour the Mammertines against the Carthaginians, and against Hiero, king of Syracuse. Roman cavalry, then, for the first time, cross the sea, and engage successfully, in battle with Hiero; who solicits and obtains peace. [Y.R. 489. B.C. 263.] A lustrum: the number of the citizens amounts to two hundred and ninety-two thousand two hundred and twenty-four. D. Junius Brutus exhibits the first show of gladiators, in honour of his deceased father. [Y.R. 490. B.C. 262.] The Aesernian colony established. Successful operations against the Carthaginians and Vulsinians. [Y.R. 491. B.C. 261.]
# Gray v. National Steam-Ship Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
115 U.S. 116
Gray v. National Steam-Ship Company
John Fitch, for appellant.
John Chetwood, for appellee.
MR. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gray v. Connecticut/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
159 U.S. 74
Gray v. Connecticut
A license to pursue any business or occupation, from the governing authority of any municipality or state, can only be invoked for the protection of one in the pursuit of such business or occupation so long as the same continues unaffected by existing or new conditions. The degree of care and scrutiny which should attend the pursuit of the business or occupation practiced will necessarily depend upon the safety and freedom from injurious or dangerous conditions attending the prosecution of the same.
In the preparation of medicinal compounds, intoxicating liquors and even still more dangerous ingredients are often properly used; but the protecting care of the government, mumcipal or state, in their use, should never be relaxed beyond the bounds of absolute safety. The responsibility of the legal authority, municipal or state, cannot be stipulated or bartered away. Whatever provisions were prescribed by the law previous to 1890 in the use of spirituous liquors in the medicinal preparations of pharmacists, they did not prevent the subsequent exaction of further conditions which the lawful authority might deem necessary or useful.
For reasons which were deemed sufficient after 1890, by the authorities of Connecticut, the use of spirituous liquors in the preparation of pharmacists' compounds required still further provisions than those previously existing, and it was provided that such liquors could not be subsequently used in their preparation without the pharmacist first procuring a druggist's license from the county commissioners.
The imposition by the court of a fine upon the accused for a disregard of this requirement trespassed in no way upon any of his rights under the constitution of the state or the fourteenth amendment of the federal constitution.
Judgment affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gray v. Howe

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
108 U.S. 12
Gray v. Howe
B. N. Baskin, for appellant.
Z. Snow, for appellees.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# H.R. 36 (117th Congress)

117th congress (2021-2022)
117th CONGRESS 1st Session
H.R. 36
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make voting in a Federal election by an unlawfully present alien an aggravated felony, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 4, 2021
Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration
A BILL
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make voting in a Federal election by an unlawfully present alien an aggravated felony, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

### SECTION 1. REPEAL OF NATIONAL VOTER REGISTRATION ACT OF 1993.

    The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (52 U.S.C. 20501 et seq.) is repealed.
# H.R. 3200/Division C/Title V/Subtitle E
## SUBTITLE E — STATES FAILING TO ADHERE TO CERTAIN EMPLOYMENT OBLIGATIONS
### SEC. 2541. LIMITATION ON FEDERAL FUNDS.

    A State is eligible for Federal funds under the provisions of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) only if the State—
          (1) agrees to be subject in its capacity as an employer to each obligation under Division A of this Act and the amendments made by such division applicable to persons in their capacity as an employer; and
          (2) assures that all political subdivisions in the State will do the same.
# H.R. 35 (117th Congress)

117th congress (2021-2022)
117th CONGRESS 1st Session
H.R. 35
To terminate the designation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan as a major non-NATO ally, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 4, 2021
Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs
A BILL
To terminate the designation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan as a major non-NATO ally, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

### SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF DESIGNATION OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN AS A MAJOR NON-NATO ALLY.

    (a) In General.—Effective beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act—
       (1) the designation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan as a major non-NATO ally pursuant to section 517(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321k(a)(1)) or any other provision of law is hereby terminated; and
       (2) the President may not issue a separate designation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan as a major non-NATO ally pursuant to section 517(a)(1) of such Act or any other provision of law unless the President submits to Congress a certification described in subsection (b).
    (b) Certification.—A certification described in this subsection is a certification that contains a determination of the President that—
       (1) Pakistan continues to conduct military operations that are contributing to significantly disrupting the safe haven and freedom of movement of the Haqqani Network in Pakistan;
       (2) Pakistan has taken steps to demonstrate its commitment to prevent the Haqqani Network from using any Pakistani territory as a safe haven;
       (3) the Government of Pakistan actively coordinates with the Government of Afghanistan to restrict the movement of militants, such as the Haqqani Network, along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border; and
       (4) Pakistan has shown progress in arresting and prosecuting Haqqani Network senior leaders and mid-level operatives.
# Guantanamo Bay Gazette

* Volume 63
** Friday, Jan. 6, 2006 (start transcription)
** Friday, Jan. 13, 2006 (start transcription)
** Friday, Jan. 20, 2006 (start transcription)
** Friday, Jan. 27, 2006 (start transcription)
** Friday, Feb. 3, 2006 (start transcription)
** Friday, Feb. 10, 2006 (start transcription)
** Friday, Feb. 17, 2006 (start transcription)
** Friday, Feb. 24, 2006 (transcription project)
** Friday, Mar. 3, 2006
** Friday, Mar. 10, 2006 (start transcription)
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Guaranitee Trust Safety Deposit Company v. Delta Pine Land Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
190 U.S. 636
Guaranitee Trust Safety Deposit Company v. Delta Pine Land Company
Messrs. Michael F. McCullen and T. D. Young for petitioner.
Messrs. Frank Johnston, Edward Mayes, and J. M. Dickinson for respondents.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 677 -- Order: Granting the Petitioners' Motions for Judgment on Their Pending Habeas Petitions and Denying as Moot The Petitioners' Motions for Immediate Release on Parole into the United States

* related portals: Guantanamo.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
From: http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2008mc00442/131990/677/0.pdf
Granting the Petitioners' Motions for Judgment on Their Pending Habeas Petitions and Denying as Mott The Petitioners' Motions for Immediate Release on Parole into the United States
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
| In Re: Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation . . . . . . | Misc No. :08-0442 (TFH) Civil Action No. 05-cv-1509 (RMU) 05-cv-1602 (RMU) 05-cv-1704 (RMU) 05-cv-2370 (RMU) 05-cv-2398 (RMU) 08-cv-1310 (RMU) Document Nos.133, 134, 172 |
Order
Granting the Petitioners' Motions for Judgment on Their Pending Habeas Petitions and Denying as Mott The Petitioners' Motions for Immediate Release on Parole into the United States
For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is this 8th day of October, 2008,
ORDERED that the motion of Huzaifa Parhat and four other petitioners for judgment on their habeas petitions and release into the continental United States is GRANTED; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of Huzaifa Parhat and four other petitioners for immediate release on parole into the continental United States pending final judgment is DENIED as MOOT; and it is
ORDERED that the remaining petitioners' motion for immediate release on parole into the continental United States pending final judgment and for release into the continental United States is DENIED as MOOT as to immediate release on parole and GRANTED as to release into the United States; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the government shall produce each of the petitioners before this court on Friday, October 10, 2008 at 10:00 am, at which time the court will impose such short-term conditions of release as it then finds reasonable and appropriate; and it is
ORDERED that a hearing shall take place on Thursday, October 16, 2008 at 2:00 pm, at which time the court imposed terms and conditions will be reassessed and altered if necessary; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that a representative from the Department of Homeland Security be present at the October 16, 2008 hearing.
SO ORDERED.
Ricardo M. Urbina United States District Judge
# Guantanamo Bay Gazette/Volume 63/Number 8

Guantanamo Bay Gazette
* AACO celebrates African-American history month with dinner-dance
* Setting the record straight
* RADM Harris named as next JTF Commander
* NAVSTA CO sets fraternization policy
* Seabee: A solid history of construction
* Students tread the runway in style
* It's all about staying healthy while having fun
* Environmental talks trash to base residents
* Commands challenged to get 'crews into shape'
* New Navy readiness program launched
* Family member employment program available
* Farewell for the Jeffries
* Housing update
* Guantanamo detainees held legally, official says
* No Orthodontics in GTMO
* Navy leaders budget for 21st century sailor, force
* Downtown Lyceum
* MWR Happenings
* GTMO Shopper
* Gun salute
* Scrub, rub
# Fortunée

* "Fortunée" in Fairy Tales by the Countess d'Aulnoy (1856)
* "Felicia and the Pot of Pinks" in The Blue Fairy Book (1889)
# Fortune (for Pascale)

"Fortune (for Pascale)" is a poem written by American poet Allen B. Tranquen and published in 1993 by Savant, a not-for-profit literary publisher.
<poem>The unexpected in our relationship has been a backbone with the hope of a love that lasts that grows running through it like blood returning to the heart just in time
Unannounced we appeared to share a few moments or look away from the day
This work is in the public domain worldwide because it has been so released by the author.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado v. Lucas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
379 U.S. 693
Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado v. Lucas
Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen. of Colorado, Charles S. Vigil, Richard S. Kitchen, Sr., Stephen H. Hart and James Lawrence White, for appellants.
Charles Ginsberg and George Louis Creamer, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado v. Lucas/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
379 U.S. 693
Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado v. Lucas
Insofar as the judgment of the District Court decides federal questions, it is affirmed. Insofar as the judgment decides other questions, it is vacated and the cause is remanded for further consideration in light of the supervening decision of the Colorado Supreme Court in White v. Anderson, Colo., 394 P.2d 333 (1964).
Mr. Justice CLARK, Mr. Justice HARLAN, Mr. Justice STEWART, and Mr. Justice GOLDBERG, concurring.
It is our understanding that the Court's disposition of this case leaves it open to the District Court to abstain on the question as to the severability of the various provisions of Amendment No. 7, pending resolution of that issue with reasonable promptitude in further state court proceedings. We deem it appropriate explicitly to state our view that this is the course which the District Court should follow. On this basis, we join the Court's opinion.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Forty-four Sermons

* Salvation by Faith
* The Almost Christian
* Awake, Thou That Sleepest
* Scriptural Christianity
* Justification By Faith
* The Righteousness of Faith
* The Way to the Kingdom
* The First-Fruits of the Spirit
* The Spirit of Bondage and of Adoption
* The Witness of the Spirit - Discourse I
* The Witness of our own Spirit
* The Means of Grace
* The Circumcision of the Heart
* The Marks of the New Birth
* The Great Privilege of those that are Born of God
* Upon our Lord's Sermon on the Mount Discourse I
* Upon our Lord's Sermon on the Mount Discourse II
* Upon our Lord's Sermon on the Mount Discourse III
* Upon our Lord's Sermon on the Mount Discourse IV
* Upon our Lord's Sermon on the Mount Discourse V
* Upon our Lord's Sermon on the Mount Discourse VI
* Upon our Lord's Sermon on the Mount Discourse VII
* Upon our Lord's Sermon on the Mount Discourse VIII
* Upon our Lord's Sermon on the Mount Discourse IX
* Upon our Lord's Sermon on the Mount Discourse X
* Upon our Lord's Sermon on the Mount Discourse XI
* Upon our Lord's Sermon on the Mount Discourse XII
* Upon our Lord's Sermon on the Mount Discourse XIII
* The Original, Nature, Property and Use of the Law
* The Law Established through Faith Discourse I
* The Law Established through Faith Discourse II
* The Nature of Enthusiasm
* A Caution against Bigotry
* Catholic Spirit
* Christian Perfection
* Wandering Thoughts
* Satan's Devices
* Original Sin
* The New Birth
* The Wilderness State
* Heaviness through Manifold Temptations
* Self-Denial
* The Cure of Evil Speaking
* The Use of Money

## External links

* The Sermons of John Wesley, 1872 Edition (Thomas Jackson, editor): The Standard Sermons
* Forty-four sermons at archive.org
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Company (237 U.S. 678)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
237 U.S. 678
Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Company (237 U.S. 678)
Argued: May 17, 1915. --- Decided: June 1, 1915
Mr. Warren Grice for complainant.
Mr. Chief Justice White announced the following decree.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Company (304 U.S. 546)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
304 U.S. 546
Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Company (304 U.S. 546)

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Company (304 U.S. 546)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
304 U.S. 546
Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Company (304 U.S. 546)
Messrs. John C. Hart, of Atlanta, Ga., and Ligon Johnson, of New York City, for complainant.
Martin A. Vogel, of New York City, and Howard Cornick, of Prescott, Ariz., for defendant.
Decree entered vacating all orders and decrees which have heretofore been entered in this cause against The Ducktown Sulphur, Copper & Iron Company, Ltd., and Tennessee Copper Company excepting insofar as they relate to the taxation of costs, and the cause dismissed. A rule is ordered to issue returnable on May 26, next, requiring the Ducktown Chemical & Iron Company to show cause why it should not pay costs charged against the defendant Ducktown Sulphur, Copper & Iron Compny, Ltd .

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Company (240 U.S. 650)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
240 U.S. 650
Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Company (240 U.S. 650)
Argued: February 28, 1916. --- Decided: April 3, 1916
Messrs. J. A. Drake, clifford Walker, Mark Bolding, and Lamar Hill for complainant.
Mr. George H. West, on behalf of Messrs. W. B. Miller and J. A. Fowler for defendant, the Ducktown Sulphur, Copper, & Iron Company, Limited.
The CHIEF JUSTICE announced the following order:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia v. Trustees of Cincinnati Southern Railway

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
248 U.S. 26
Georgia v. Trustees of Cincinnati Southern Railway
Argued: Nov. 7, 1918. --- Decided: Nov 18, 1918
Mr. William A. Wimbish, of Atlanta, Ga., for the State of Georgia.
Messrs. Edward Colston, of Cincinnati, Ohio, and Michael M. Allison, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for defendants.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Company (237 U.S. 474)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
237 U.S. 474
Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Company (237 U.S. 474)
Argued: April 6 and 7, 1915. --- Decided: May 10, 1915
Messrs. Warren Grice, J. A. Drake, Lamar Hill, and Mr. Thomas S. Felder, Attorney General of Georgia, for complainant.
Messrs. J. A. Fowler, W. B. Miller, and H. G. Fowler, for defendant the Ducktown Sulphur, Copper, & Iron Company.
Mr. Justice McReynolds delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse