OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 125/Issue 1613

LITTELL'S LIVING AGE.
| Fifth Series, Volume X. | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | No. 1613. — May 8, 1875. | $\scriptstyle {\left\{{\begin{matrix}\ \end{matrix}}\right.}$ | From Beginning Vol. CXXV. |
CONTENTS. :
| I. | Milton, | Macmillan's Magazine, | 323 |
| II. | Three Feathers. By William Black, author of "The Adventures of a Phaeton," "The Princess of Thule," etc.Part XIV., | Cornhill Magazine, | 329 |
| III. | The Cost of Living. By Edward A. Freeman, | Cornhill Magazine, | 337 |
| IV. | Alice Lorraine. By the author of "The Maid of Sker." Conclusion, | Blackwood's Magazine, | 344 |
| V. | The Abode of Snow. Part IV., | Blackwood's Magazine, | 355 |
| VI. | Dead Dutch Cities, | Spectator, | 369 |
| VII. | Vicissitudes of Ritual, | Saturday Review, | 372 |
| VIII. | A Spanish Passion-Play, | Spectator, | 374 |
| IX. | Arctic Vegetation, | Nature, | 377 |
| X. | The Cost of Living, | Spectator, | 379 |
| XI. | The Russian Revolution of 1762, | Academy, | 382 |
POETRY. :
| Lexington, 1775, By John G. Whittier | 322 | Grandmother, | 322 |
| | | Second Thoughts, | 322 |
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 125/Issue 1613/Grandmother

* GRANDMOTHER
* 'Mongst roses in the sunset glow,
* Ere the white arum's cup of snow
* Had closed.
* Grandmother sat, content to see
* The beauty round her; or maybe
* She calmly dozed.
* She, with grandchildren round her path,
* Finding in life sweet aftermath,
* Grew young;
* Old voices surged upon the breeze,
* That over days remote from these
* A spell had hung.
* Whilst golden sunbeams danced in space.
* Calling up many a sunny place
* Of old;
* Or here and there a cloudy blot.
* That blurred the skies, of darkened spot
* In memory told.
* Yet dark and light so blent that they
* Made picture fair of summer day;
* Nor woke
* The shadows aught that grief might bring,
* For Time smoothed o'er with gentle wing
* Each harsher stroke.
* The past's wild sobs were hushed, for age
* Clear read God's writing on the page
* Once dim;
* And earth's declining days waxed pale
* In the light shining through the veil
* That hides from Him.
* In a fair border-land she seems;
* Behind, before, a world of dreams
* All peace;
* And doubts that had perplexed her youth
* Had settled into simple truth
* And fear's surcease.
* Maude waiting wonders. In her eyes
* To age a time of darkened skies
* Is given.
* Strained silver cord, and hushed life-song -
* "Ay, Maude, but chant of angel-throng
* Is nigh — in heaven."
* Cassell's Magazine.J. G.
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 125/Issue 1614

LITTELL'S LIVING AGE.
| Fifth Series, Volume X. | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | No. 1614. — May 15, 1875. | $\scriptstyle {\left\{{\begin{matrix}\ \end{matrix}}\right.}$ | From Beginning Vol. CXXV. |
CONTENTS. :
| I. | Instinct and Reason, | Contemporary Review, | 387 |
| II. | Miss Angel. By Miss Thackeray. Part V., | Cornhill Magazine, | 402 |
| III. | Fashions and Tricks of Speech, | Blackwood's Magazine, | 408 |
| IV. | The Marriage of Moira Fergus, | Cornhill Magazine, | 418 |
| V. | The Abode of Snow. Part V., | Blackwood's Magazine, | 425 |
| VI. | Fated to be Free. By Jean Ingelow. Part V. By Jean Ingelow. Part V., | Good Words, | 439 |
| VII. | The Suez Canal, | Pall Mall Gazette, | 444 |
| VIII. | Dreams, | Lancet, | 446 |
| IX. | Literary Curiosities, | Gentleman's Magazine, | 447 |
POETRY. :
| Once Upon a Time, | 386 | After, | 386 |
| Few Days, | 386 |
| Miscellany, | Miscellany, | Miscellany, | 448 |
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 125/Issue 1612/Miscellany

​Some interesting facts about the woodcarving industry of the Bernese Oberland are given in a recent official report from Mr. Jenner. This industry, which does not date further back than 1815, now furnishes employment for upwards of two thousand workmen, and within the last few years the sales have risen to an average of nearly 80,000l. These sums have sufficed to spread ease over districts the inhabitants of which were formerly much pinched by want; the work, too, is of such a nature that it does not interfere with many other avocations. The cowherd and shepherd tending their flocks in the Alpine pasturages, the charcoal-burner watching his fires, and the peasant families sitting round their stoves, during the long winter evenings, can, at the expense of but little physical exertion, add greatly to their store of comforts by means of some little skill in carving. A very large proportion of the cheaper articles are actually produced in this manner. The wages of regular workmen range from one to eight francs a day. Almost every variety of timber may be utilized; fir, lime, walnut, oak, pear, and apple trees have all their special applications, and of late years the most renowned makers have taken to carve "palissandre" or rosewood, mahogany, cedar, &c. Side by side with the wood-carving industry, but greatly surpassing it in pecuniary results, is the manufacture of parquets, which is of still more recent introduction. This trade is carried on in eighteen out of the twenty-two cantons of Switzerland, and is now in the most flourishing condition. As nearly as can be ascertained, the annual production of the twenty odd establishments which carry it on reaches the value of 8,000,000 francs (320,000l.). Scarcely a Swiss house with any pretension to comfort is now built without a parquet in at least one of its rooms.
Here is a singular sketch from Winstanley's "Lives of the Most Famous English Poets; or, the Honor of Parnassus," 1687: "John Milton was one whose natural parts might deservedly give him a place among the principal of our English poets, having written two heroick poems and a tragedy, namely 'Paradise Lost,' 'Paradise Regain'd,' and ' Sampson Agonista.' But his Fame is gone out like a Candle in a Snuff, and his Memory will always stink, which might have ever lived in honourable Repute, had not he been a notorious Traytor, and most impiously and villanously bely'd that Blessed Martyr King Charles the First."
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 125/Issue 1613/Second Thoughts

* SECOND THOUGHTS.
* Where the wood-paths broke in twain,
* Doubting, Dolly checked her rein.
* "If I take that path," mused she,
* "I shall meet with somebody.
* Nay, but that would never do;
* Maidens should be wooed, not woo!"
* So the other path she prest,
* Saying, "Second thoughts are best."
* Who is that with Dolly there?
* What has made her ride so fair?
* "Somebody," most strange to say.
* Rode the self-same way to-day;
* And there, among the greenwoods dim,
* Dolly told her choice to him,
* Whispering what her heart confest —
* "Truly, second thoughts were best."
* F. E. Weatherly, M.A.
* Cassell's Magazine.
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 125/Issue 1612

LITTELL'S LIVING AGE.
| Fifth Series, Volume X. | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | No. 1612. — May 1, 1875. | $\scriptstyle {\left\{{\begin{matrix}\ \end{matrix}}\right.}$ | From Beginning Vol. CXXV. |
CONTENTS. :
| I. | William Hazlitt, | Cornhill Magazine, | 259 |
| II. | Alice Lorraine. By the author of "The Maid of Sker." Part XXII., | Blackwood's Magazine, | 273 |
| III. | The Abode of Snow. Part III., | Blackwood's Magazine, | 283 |
| IV. | Three Feathers. By William Black, author of "The Adventures of a Phaeton," "The Princess of Thule," etc. Part XIII., | Cornhill Magazine, | 300 |
| V. | Secret Papers of the Empire, | Fraser's Magazine, | 308 |
| VI. | The Funeral of a Son of Heaven, | Pall Mall Gazette, | 315 |
| VII. | Garibaldi and the Tiber, | Spectator, | 318 |
POETRY. :
| Vision of Spring in Winter. By Algernon Charles Swinburne, | Vision of Spring in Winter. By Algernon Charles Swinburne, | Vision of Spring in Winter. By Algernon Charles Swinburne, | 258 |
| Miscellany, | Miscellany, | Miscellany, | 320 |
# Lovell v. Cragin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
136 U.S. 130
Lovell v. Cragin
Joseph P. Hornor and W. Hallett Phillips, for appellant.
J. B. Rouse and Wm. Grant, for appellees.
LAMAR, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lovejoy v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
128 U.S. 171
Lovejoy v. United States
J. M. Thurston, for plaintiffs in error.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice GRAY, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lovell Manufacturing Company v. Cary

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
147 U.S. 623
Lovell Manufacturing Company v. Cary
W. Bakewell, Thos. W. Bakewell, and John K. Hallock, for appellant.
W. C. Witter and W. H. Kenyon, for appellees.
Mr. Justice BLATCHFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lovejoy v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
128 U.S. 171
Lovejoy v. United States
The bill of exceptions presents two questions, neither of which requires extended discussion: 1. The act of June 30, 1879, c. 52, § 2, (21 St. 43,) which provides that (unless the judge orders the names of jurors to be drawn from the boxes used by the state authorities) all jurors, 'including those summoned during the session of the court,' shall be publicly drawn from a box containing not less than 300 names, placed therein by the clerk and a commissioner appointed for the purpose,-while it expressly repeals certain sections of the Revised Statutes, respecting the selection, qualifications, and oath of jurors,-does not touch the power of the court, whenever, at the time of forming a jury to try a particular case, the panel of jurors previously summoned according to law is found for any reason to have been exhausted, to call in talesmen from the by-standers to supply the deficiency; and does not, either expressly or by implication, repeal section 804 of the Revised Statutes, by which, 'when, from challenges or other wise, there is not a petit jury to determine any civil or criminal cause, the marshal or his deputy shall, by order of the court in which such defect of jurors happens, return jurymen from the by-standers sufficient to complete the panel.' 3 Bl. Comm. 364, 365; 4 Bl. Comm. 354; U.S. v. Rose, 6 Fed. Rep. 136; Clawson v. U.S., 114 U.S. 477, 487, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 949.
It is established by repeated decisions that a court of the United States, in submitting a case to the jury, may at its discretion express its opinion upon the facts, and that such an opinion is not reviewable on error, so long as no rule of law is incorrectly stated and all matters of fact are ultimately submitted to the determination of the jury. The charge of the circuit court in the present case was clearly within the rule. Rucker v. Wheeler, 127 U.S. 85, 93, 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1142, and cases cited. Judgment affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lovell v. City of Griffin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Lovell v. City of Griffin, GA, 303 U.S. 444 (1938), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. This case was remarkable in its discussion of the requirement of persons to seek government sanction to distribute religious material. In this particular case, the Supreme Court ruled it was not constitutional for a city to require such sanction. Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
303 U.S. 444
Lovell v. City of Griffin
Argued: and Submitted Feb. 4, 1938. --- Decided: March 28, 1938
Mr. O. R. Moyle, of Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.
Messrs. Hughes Spalding and Sumter M. Kelley, both of Atlanta, Ga., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 444-446 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Martin v. Steamship Southwark

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
191 U.S. 1
Martin v. Steamship Southwark
Argued: March 3, 1903. --- Decided: October 19, 1903
Messrs. John F. Lewis and Horace L. Cheyney for petitioners.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Martin v. Thomas/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
65 U.S. 315
Martin v. Thomas
This is a writ of error to the district court of the United States for the district of Wisconsin.
The action was replevin; the pleadings being filed, a jury was called, who rendered a verdict in damages for nine thousand seven hundred and eighty dollars and ninety-six cents, with costs.
In the course of the trial a bill of exceptions was filed, on which the questions of law were raised. Be it remembered, that at the trial of the above-entitled action, the plaintiff produced an instrument in writing in the words and figures, and with interlineations and erasures following, to wit:
Know all men by these presents, that we and John T. Martin, and John Keefe, and Andrew Proudfit, are held and firmly bound unto Major J. Thomas, marshal of the United States for the Wisconsin district, in the sum of twenty thousand dollars, to be paid, &c.
Whereas the defendants have required the return of property replevied by the marshal, at the suit of George T. Rogers against Henry M. Remington and John T. Martin, Jun.; now, the condition of this obligation is such, that if the said defendants in said suit shall deliver to the marshal said property, if such delivery be adjudged, and shall pay to him such sum as may for any cause be recovered against the defendants, then this obligation to be void.
The bond upon which judgment was recovered was void, as against the defendants, because, after the same was executed by them as sureties, Remington, their principal, without their knowledge or consent, and with the consent of the marshal, erased his name from the bond.
In Miller v. Stuart, 9 Wheat., 702, Mr. Justice Story said, nothing can be clearer, both upon principle and authority, than the doctrine that the liability of a surety is not to be extended, by implication, beyond the terms of his contract. To the extent, and in the manner, and under the circumstances, pointed out in the obligation, he is bound, and no further. It is not sufficient that he may sustain no injury by a change in the contract, or that it may be for his benefit. He has a right to stand upon the very terms of his contract; and if he does not assent to any variation of it, and an alteration of it is made, it is fatal.
Hunt's Adm. v. Adams, 6 Mass., 521.
2. After the execution of the bond by the defendants, to be delivered to the marshal, it was refused and disagreed to by him, and it thereby became void. Any subsequent alteration would require a new deed or positive assent to the same, to make it valid against the defendants.
Sheppard's Touchstone, 70, 394.
The judgment is reversed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Martin v. Thompson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
120 U.S. 376
Martin v. Thompson
M. Mullany, for motion.
No brief filed in opposition.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Martin v. Texas (382 U.S. 928)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
382 U.S. 928
Martin v. Texas (382 U.S. 928)
Clem McCLELLAND, petitioner,
v.
TEXAS.
No. 345.
Clem McCLELLAND, petitioner,
v.
TEXAS.
No. 508.
Clyde W. Woody and Marian S. Rosen, for petitioner Martin.
J. Edwin Smith and Byron Skelton, for petitioner McClelland.
Samuel H. Robertson, Jr., and Carl E. F. Dally, for respondent.
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Nov. 22, 1965.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Martin v. Texas

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Martin v. Texas."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Martin v. Texas (200 U.S. 316)
* Martin v. Texas (382 U.S. 928)
# Martin v. Texas (200 U.S. 316)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
200 U.S. 316
Martin v. Texas
Argued: January 25, 1906. --- Decided: February 19, 1906
Messrs. Watson E. Coleman, O. P. Easterwood, and O. E. Smith for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. C. K. Bell, Robert Vance Davidson, and Claude Pollard for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsels from page 317 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Martin v. Thomas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
65 U.S. 315
Martin v. Thomas
THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the District Court of the United States for the district of Wisconsin.
The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
It was argued by Mr. Doolittle and Mr. Ewing for the plaintiffs in error, and by Mr. Reverdy Johnson, upon a brief filed by himself and Mr. Hipkins, for the defendants.
The counsel for the plaintiffs in error made the following points:
I. The bond upon which judgment was recovered was invalid as against the defendants, because after the same was executed by them as sureties, Remington, their principal, without their knowledge or consent, and with the consent of the marshal, erased his name from the bond.
Hunt's Adm. v. Adams, 6 Mass., 521.
Speake et al. v. U.S., 9 Cranch, 35.
Miller v. Stewart, 9 Wheaton, 702, 703.
II. After the execution of the bond by the defendants to be delivered to the marshal, it was refused and disagreed to by him, and it thereby became void. Any subsequent alteration would create a new deed requiring a new execution, or positive assent to the same, to give it validity against the defendants.
O'Neale v. Long, 4 Cranch, 60, 62.
See Sheppard's Touchstone, 70, 394, as to the effect of disagreement.
III. There was no breach of the condition of the bond.
The obligors undertook to deliver the property in question to the marshal, if such delivery were adjudged, and to pay him such sum as might for any cause be recovered against the defendants, Henry W. Remington and John T. Martin, jun.
The return of the property was not adjudged, and there was no recovery of any sum of money against the defendants. The recovery was against one only.
See Miller v. Stewart, 9 Wheaton, 702, 703, and the cases cited.
The counsel for the defendants in error maintained that the alterations of the bond were immaterial, and cited:
15 John., 293; 1 Wend., 659; 10 Conn., 192.
18 Pick., 172; 5 Mass., 538; 2 Barb. Ch'y R., 119.
16 N. Y. Rep., 439; 3 Comsk. R., 188.
1 Greenleaf, (Maine Rep.,) Hale v. Russ.
1 Coke's Rep., 60.
Mr. Justice McLEAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Little Women/Part 1

They all drew to the fire, mother in the big chair, with Beth at her feet; Meg and Amy perched on either arm of the chair, and Jo leaning on the back.—Page 12.
page
LITTLE WOMEN
OR,
MEG, JO, BETH AND AMY
BY LOUISA M. ALCOTT
ILLUSTRATED BY MAY ALCOTT
BOSTON
ROBERTS BROTHERS
1869
page
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1868, by
LOUISA M. ALCOTT, In the Clerk's office of the District Court of the District of Massachusetts.
Stereotyped by Innes & Regan,
55 Water Street, Boston
Presswork by John Wilson and Son.
page
CONTENTS.
page
PREFACE.
"Go then, my little Book, and show to all
That entertain, and bid thee welcome shall,
What thou dost keep close shut up in thy breast;
And wish what thou dost show them may be blest
To them for good, may make them choose to be
Pilgrims better, by far, than thee or me.
Tell them of Mercy; she is one
Who early hath her pilgrimage begun.
Yea, let young damsels learn of her to prize
The world which is to come, and so be wise;
For little tripping maids may follow God
Along the ways which saintly feet have trod."
ADAPTED FROM JOHN BUNYAN.
Layout 2
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Little Women

* related portals: Children's literature.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, quotes, Wikidata item.
This transcription is of the first edition, in two volumes, published by Roberts Brothers, Boston.
Part One
LITTLE WOMEN
OR,
MEG, JO, BETH AND AMY
BY LOUISA M. ALCOTT
ILLUSTRATED BY MAY ALCOTT
BOSTON
ROBERTS BROTHERS
1869
page
CONTENTS.
Part Two
Little Women
OR
MEG, JO, BETH AND AMY
PART SECOND
BY LOUISA M. ALCOTT
WITH ILLUSTRATIONS
BOSTON ROBERTS BROTHERS 1869
page
CONTENTS.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Macaulay (Landor)

The dreamy rhymer's measur'd snore Falls heavy on our ears no more; And by long strides are left behind The dear delights of womankind Who win their battles like their loves, In satin waistcoats and kid gloves, And have achiev'd teh crowning work When they have truss'd and skewer'd a Turk. Another comes with stouter tread, And stalks among the statelier dead. He rushes on, and hails by turns High-crested Scott, broad-breasted Burns, And shows the British youth, who ne'er Will lag behind, what Romans were, When all the Tuscans and their Lars Shouted, and shook the tower of Mars.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Macauley v. Waterman Steamship Corporation

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
327 U.S. 540
Macauley v. Waterman Steamship Corporation
Argued: Feb. 27, 28, 1946. --- Decided: March 25, 1946
Mr.Robert L. Stern, of Washington, D.C., for petitioners.
Mr. U. Bon Geaslin, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from page 541 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice BLACK, delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse