OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Kosrae State Code/Title 6/Part 3/Chapter 35

* Section 6.3501: Notice of libel.
* Section 6.3502: Claims.
* Section 6.3503: Forfeiture and sale.
* Section 6.3504: Disposition of proceeds.
* Section 6.3505: Return.
* Section 6.3506: Settlement.
# Kosrae State Code/Title 6/Part 3/Chapter 36

* Section 6.3601: Initiation of Court Action.
* Section 6.3602: Procedure.
* Section 6.3603: Trial.
* Section 6.3604: Valuation of Land.
# Kosrae State Code/Title 6/Part 4/Chapter 43

* Section 6.4301: Definition.
* Section 6.4302: Issuance of warrant.
* Section 6.4303: Property subject to warrant.
* Section 6.4304: Procedure.
* Section 6.4305: Time of execution and return.
* Section 6.4306: Execution and return of warrant.
* Section 6.4307: Hearing following return of search warrant.
* Section 6.4308: [Filing] of search warrant and accompanying papers.
* Section 6.4309: Entrance for execution of warrant.
* Section 6.4310: Motion for return of property and suppression of evidence.
* Section 6.4311: Sale of perishable property.
* Section 6.4312: Effect of irregularity.
# Kosrae State Code/Title 6/Part 3/Chapter 37

* Section 6.3701: Jurisdiction.
* Section 6.3702: Definitions.
* Section 6.3703: Natural guardian of person alleged to be incapacitated; other persons who may be appointed as a guardian.
* Section 6.3704: Procedure for court appointment of a guardian of an incapacitated person.
* Section 6.3705: Finding; order of appointment.
* Section 6.3706: Termination of guardianship for incapacitated person.
* Section 6.3707: Removal or resignation of guardian; termination of incapacity.
* Section 6.3708: Notices in guardianship proceedings.
# Kosrae State Code/Title 6/Part 4/Chapter 41

* Section 6.4101: Process obligatory upon Police.
* Section 6.4102: Dismissal.
* Section 6.4103: Security to keep the peace.
* Section 6.4104: Motor vehicle offense.
# Kosrae State Code/Title 6/Part 4/Chapter 42

* Section 6.4201: Issuance of warrant.
* Section 6.4202: Citation.
* Section 6.4203: Complaint following arrest without warrant.
* Section 6.4204: Effect of irregularity.
* Section 6.4205: Warrant or penal summons upon complaint.
* Section 6.4206: Use of penal summons.
* Section 6.4207: Execution of warrant; service of penal summons.
* Section 6.4208: Return of service.
* Section 6.4209: Issuance of arrest warrant or penal summons on information.
# Memphis Natural Gas Company v. Beeler

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
315 U.S. 649
Memphis Natural Gas Company v. Beeler
Argued: March 6, 1942. --- Decided: March 30, 1942
Messrs. Walter P. Armstrong, of Memphis, Tenn., and Thomas A. McEachern, Jr., of New York City, for appellant.
Messrs. Whitworth Stokes and Lewis S. Pope, both of Nashville, Tenn., for appellees.
Mr. Chief Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Memphis Natural Gas Company v. Stone

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Rutledge

## Dissenting Opinion

    Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
335 U.S. 80
Memphis Natural Gas Company v. Stone
Argued: Dec. 8, 1947. --- Decided: June 21, 1948
Mr. Edward P. Russell, of Memphis, Tenn., for petitioner.
Mr. J. H. Sumrall, of Jackson, Miss., for respondent.
Mr. Justice REED announced the judgment of the Court anda n opinion in which Mr. Justice DOUGLAS and Mr. Justice MURPHY join.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Memphis Gas-Light Company v. Taxing District of Shelby County, Tennessee

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
109 U.S. 398
Memphis Gas-Light Company v. Taxing District of Shelby County, Tennessee
Henry Craft, George Gantt, and Josiah Patterson, for plaintiff in error.
J. B. Heiskell, for defendant in error.
MILLER, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Memphis Railway Company v. Pace

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
282 U.S. 241
Memphis Railway Company v. Pace
Argued: Oct. 29, 1930. --- Decided: Jan 5, 1931
Messrs. John B. Hyde and S. R. Prince, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Messrs. W. W. Magruder, of Starkville, Miss., B. H. Charles, of St. Louis, Mo., and J. E. Cunningham, of Booneville, Miss., for appellees.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lord Ullin's Daughter

* "Lord Ullin's Daughter" in The Poetical Works of Thomas Campbell (1837) by Thomas Campbell
* "Lord Ullin's Daughter", in The Reciter (n.d.)
* "Lord Ullin's Daughter", in The Elocutionist (1815-1830)
* "Lord Ullin's Daughter", in The Elocutionist (1840-1850)
* "Lord Ullin's Daughter", in The Modern Reciter (1829)
* "Lord Ullin's Daughter", in The Sentimental Reciter: A Selection of the Most Popular Pieces for Recitation (1856)
* "Lord Ullin's Daughter", in Poems That Every Child Should Know (1904), edited by Mary Elizabeth Burt

## See also

* "Parody on Lord Ullin's Daughter"
# Lord of Our Life and God of Our Salvation

This edition from Lutheran Service Book #659, 2006, via https://hymnary.org/text/lord_of_our_life_and_god_of_our_salva
Lord of our life and God of our salvation, Star of our night and Hope of ev'ry nation: Hear and receive Your Church's supplication, Lord God Almighty.
See round Your ark the hungry billows curling; See how Your foes their banners are unfurling And with great spite their fiery darts are hurling, O Lord, preserve us.
Lord, be our light when worldly darkness veils us; Lord, be our shield when earthly armor fails us; And in the day when hell itself assails us, Grant us Your peace, Lord:
Peace in our hearts, where sinful thoughts are raging, Peace in Your Church, our troubled souls assuaging, Peace when the world its endless war is waging, Peace in Your heaven.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Lord William

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Lord William."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Lord William, Scottish ballad
* Lord William, poem by Robert Southey
# Lord of the World

LORD OF THE WORLD
* LORD OF THE WORLD
* BY
* ROBERT HUGH BENSON
* NEW YORK
* DODD, MEAD & COMPANY
* 1908
Copyright, 1907 By Dodd, Mead & Company
Published March, 1908
Dedication
CLAVI DOMUS DAVID
PREFACE
I am perfectly aware that this is a terribly sensational book, and open to innumerable criticisms on that account, as well as on many others. But I did not know how else to express the principles I desired (and which I passionately believe to be true) except by producing their lines to a sensational point. I have tried, however, not to scream unduly loud, and to retain, so far as possible, reverence and consideration for the opinions of other people. Whether I have succeeded in that attempt is quite another matter.
Robert Hugh Benson.
Cambridge, 1907.
CONTENTS
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Matthews v. Huwe

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
269 U.S. 262
Matthews v. Huwe
Argued: Oct. 12, 1925. --- Decided: Nov 30, 1925
Mr. Mortimer Mattews, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Charles S. Bell, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant in error.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Matthews v. Iron-Clad Manufacturing Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
124 U.S. 347
Matthews v. Iron-Clad Manufacturing Company
A. V. Briesen, for appellant.
Frederic H. Betts and Ernest C. Webb, for appellee.
GRAY, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Matthews v. Little/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 1223
Matthews v. Little
Applicant Ethel Mae Matthews is a prospective candidate for alderman in an Atlanta, Georgia, municipal election now scheduled for October 7. Applicant Julia Shields is a duly qualified Atlanta voter. Both applicants claim that their constitutional and statutory rights are abridged by the exclusion of potential candidates for local offices who cannot afford the filing fees fixed by an Atlanta municipal ordinance of August 26, 1969. They challenge the ordinance on the ground that fees sought to be exacted violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 79 Stat. 439, 42 U.S.C. § 1973c (1964 ed., Supp. I). The constitutional question appears to me to be a substantial one which calls for decision by the full Court. This question is all the more serious because a three-judge district court decided in this case that the collection of the filing fees fixed by the ordinance does unconstitutionally deny equal protection of the laws. The city election is presently set for October 7, and, although this Court meets October 6, it will not have time to consider and decide the merits of the constitutional claim before the election is to be held. The result is that applicants cannot have their case decided unless some provision is made to take care of the problem. A court-ordered postponement of the election could have a serious disruptive effect. On the other hand, the refusal or inability to pay fees deemed unconstitutional might keep serious candidates from running, thus depriving Atlanta voters of opportunity to select candidates of their choice. Both of these undesirable consequences should be avoided if possible, and to some extent they can be. This can be done by temporarily relieving applicants from payment of the challenged fees until the entire Court has had an opportunity to pass on all the questions raised. Should the applicants' claims be accepted by the Court, they would then never be required to pay the challenged fees. Should their claims be rejected, they would then be subject to the fees. Because the time for candidates to file notice of their candidacy is scheduled to expire on September 10, 1969, a necessary element of this order is that the city should extend the date for candidates to file notice of their candidacy at least until Tuesday, September 16, 1969. This disposition permits Atlanta to proceed with the election as now scheduled. In the alternative, Atlanta officials could decide of their own accord to postpone the municipal election until after this Court has had an opportunity to hear and decide the issues involved. It is or ordered.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Matthews v. McStea

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
91 U.S. 7
Matthews v. McStea
ERROR to the Court of Common Pleas for the City and County of New York.
The original cause of action was (inter alia) an acceptance of a bill of exchange by the firm of Brander, Chambliss, & Co., of New Orleans, dated April 23, 1861, payable in one year to the order of McStea, and accepted on the day of its date by the firm, whereof Matthews, it was alleged, was then a member. The principal defence, and the only one which presents a Federal question, was, that, at the time when the acceptance was made, the defendant, Matthews, was a resident of the State of New York; that the other members of the firm (also made defendants in the suit, but not served with process) were residents of Louisiana; and that, before the acceptance, the copartnership was dissolved by the war of the rebellion. This defence was not sustained in the Common Pleas, and the judgment of that court was affirmed by the Court of Appeals.
Matthews sued out this writ of error.
Mr. John Sherwood and Mr. William M. Evarts for the plaintiff in error.
The war began in Louisiana, April 19, 1861. The Protector, 12 Wall. 700. The proclamation of April 19, 1861, declaring the blockade, was a notice of prohibition of commercial intercourse. The proclamations of April 17 and 19, and the act of Congress of July 13, 1861, do not contain any permission to trade, or any inference that such trade was permitted. Commercial intercourse during war being unlawful, it cannot be implied from the proclamations of the Executive and the acts of Congress. The Prize Cases, 2 Black, 635; United States v. Lane, 8 Wall. 185; Cappell v. Hall, 7 id. 542.
The copartnership of Brander, Chambliss, & Co., was dissolved, even if a limited intercourse was permitted. The courts of Louisiana were closed. The legality of commerce and the mutual use of courts of justice must be inseparable. Griswold v. Waddington, 16 Johns. 468.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Matthews v. Densmore

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
109 U.S. 216
Matthews v. Densmore

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Matthews v. Little

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 1223
Matthews v. Little
Frederic S. LeClercq, on the application.
Mr. Justice BLACK, Circuit Justice.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Begbie, (Hon.) Sir Matthew Baillie, Knt.

​Begbie, (Hon.) Sir Matthew Baillie, Knt., chief justice British Columbia since 1870, sole judge 1858-70, knighted 26 Oct., 1875, M.A., St. John's Coll., Camb., 1854, B.A., fellow 1844, from Elizabeth Coll., Guernsey, a student of Lincoln's Inn 16 Nov., 1841 (then aged 22), called to the bar 22 Nov., 1844 (eldest son of Major F. S. Begbie, 82nd regt.); born , 1819.
    Victoria. British Columbia; United University Club.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Belgrave, Dalrymple James

​Belgrave, Dalrymple James, B.A. Trin. Coll., Camb., practises before the supreme court at Griqualand West, went North-eastern circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 17 Nov., 1873 (then aged 22), called to the bar 28 June, 1876 (2nd son of late Thomas Belgrave, of North Kilworth, co. Leicester, capt. R.N.); born , 1851.
    Griqualand West, Cape of Good Hope.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bell, Francis Henry Dillon

​Bell, Francis Henry Dillon, B.A., St. John's Coll., Camb., 1873, notary public and solicitor of supreme court at Wellington, a student of the Middle Temple 8 Nov., 1871, called to the bar 6 June, 1874 (eldest son of Sir Francis Dillon Bell, of Wellington, New Zealand, speaker of the House of Representatives); born 31 March, 1851; married April, 1877, Caroline, dau. of William Robinson, Esq., and has issue (see Foster's Our Noble and Gentle Families).
    Wellington, New Zealand.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bell, George William

​Bell, George William, secretary to Law Fire Insurance Society, member of council King's Coll., London, since 1880, a student of the Inner Temple 19 April, 1842, went to the Middle Temple 17 April, 1845, where he was called to the bar 16 Jan., 1846 (eldest son of William Bell, Esq., of London); born .
    11, St. Edmund Street, Regent's Park, N.W.; 114, Chancery Lane, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bell, Henry

​Bell, Henry, legal remembrancer to Government of Bengal, late member of Bengal Legislative Council, author of Landlord and Tenant in Bengal, a student of the Middle Temple 25 April, 1865, called to the bar 14 Jan., 1873 (son of John Bell, of Uppingham, Rutland, surgeon); born , .
    Calcutta.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bell, Walter Henry Lynden

​Bell, Walter Henry Lynden, B.A. Trin. Coll., Dublin, a member of the South-eastern circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 12 Jan., 1880 (then aged 25), scholarship in common law Feb., 1883, called to the bar 18 April, 1883 (2nd son of late Robert Bell, of Dublin, bar.-at-law); born , 1855.
    Lamb Buildings, Temple, E.C.; Palace Chambers, Westminster.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bell, John

​Bell, John, M.A., Caius Coll., Camb., 1835, clerk of the peace since 1838, and formerly commissioner of bankrupts Westmorland, also assistant enclosure commissioner and auditor of a district of unions, lieut. Westmorland militia, author of Treatise on the Game Laws, a student of Lincoln's Inn 25 April, 1832 (then aged 30), called to the bar 16 June, 1835 (eldest son of James Bell, Esq., of Ormside Lodge, Westmorland); born , 1801.
    Appleby, Westmorland.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bell, William James

​Bell, William James, B.A. Clare Coll., Camb., conveyancer and equity draftsman, a student of the Inner Temple 6 Oct., 1879 (then aged 20), called to the bar 21 June, 1882 (only son of Dr. James Bell, F.R.S., F.C.S., of Howell Hill House, Surrey, professor of chemistry); born 3 May, 1859; married 26 Sept., 1882, Bertha Diana, dau. of late George Torr, Esq., of Garbrand Hall, Surrey, and has issue.
    Garbrand Hall, Ewell, Surrey; 1. Temple Gardens, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Begg, David Gray

​Begg, David Gray, equity draftsman and conveyancer, educated at Aberdeen Univ., a student of Lincoln's Inn 10 April, 1856 (then aged 26), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1859 (only surviving son of Rev. Alexander Begg, late of Fraserburgh, co. Aberdeen, dec.); born 4 Oct., 1829; married 1st, 5 Sept., 1860, Sarah, eldest dau. of late Robert Millington, Esq.; she died 13 April, 1870; he married 2ndly, 2 Jan., 1872, Henrietta, dau. of John E. Fox, of Dartmouth, Devon, and of London.
    4, Buckland Villas, Hampstead, N.W.; 16, Old Buildings, Lincoln's Inn. W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Belfield, Henry Conway

​Belfield, Henry Conway, B.A. Oriel Coll., Oxon, a member of the Western circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 12 Jan., 1878 (then aged 22), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1880 (eldest son of John Belfield, Esq., of Bellevue, Exeter, Devon); born , 1856.
    2, Plowden Buildings, Temple, E.C.
# Little White Rose

“Haste, maiden, haste! the spray has come to budding…”
* Shorter, Dora Sigerson (1893), "Little White Rose" in Verses
* Shorter, Dora Sigerson (1907), "Little White Rose" in The Collected Poems of Dora Sigerson Shorter
# Literary Lapses/Telling his Faults

Telling His Faults
" Oh, do, Mr. Sapling," said the beautiful girl at the summer hotel, "do let me read the palm of your hand! I can tell you all your faults."
Mr. Sapling gave an inarticulate gurgle and a roseate flush swept over his countenance as he surrendered his palm to the grasp of the fair enchantress.
"Oh, you're just full of faults, just full of them, Mr. Sapling!" she cried.
Mr. Sapling looked it.
"To begin with," said the beautiful girl, slowly and reflectingly, "you are dreadfully cynical: you hardly believe in anything at all, and you've utterly no faith in us poor women."
The feeble smile that had hitherto kindled the features of Mr. Sapling into a ray of chastened imbecility, was distorted in an effort at cynicism.
"Then your next fault is that you are too determined; much too determined. When ​once you have set your will on any object, you crush every obstacle under your feet."
Mr. Sapling looked meekly down at his tennis shoes, but began to feel calmer, more lifted up. Perhaps he had been all these things without knowing it.
"Then you are cold and sarcastic."
Mr. Sapling attempted to look cold and sarcastic. He succeeded in a rude leer.
"And you're horribly world-weary, you care for nothing. You have drained philosophy to the dregs, and scoff at everything."
Mr. Sapling's inner feeling was that from now on he would simply scoff and scoff and scoff.
"Your only redeeming quality is that you are generous. You have tried to kill even this, but cannot. Yes," concluded the beautiful girl, "those are your faults, generous still, but cold, cynical, and relentless. Good night, Mr. Sapling."
And resisting all entreaties the beautiful girl passed from the verandah of the hotel and vanished.
And when later in the evening the brother of the beautiful girl borrowed Mr. Sapling's tennis racket, and his bicycle for a fortnight, ​and the father of the beautiful girl got Sapling to endorse his note for a couple of hundreds, and her uncle Zephas borrowed his bedroom candle and used his razor to cut up a plug of tobacco, Mr. Sapling felt proud to be acquainted with the family.
# Literary Lapses/The Force of Statistics

The Force of Statistics
They were sitting on a seat of the car, immediately in front of me. I was consequently able to hear all that they were saying. They were evidently strangers who had dropped into a conversation. They both had the air of men who considered themselves profoundly interesting as minds. It was plain that each laboured under the impression that he was a ripe thinker.
One had just been reading a book which lay in his lap.
"I've been reading some very interesting statistics," he was saying to the other thinker.
"Ah, statistics" said the other; "wonderful things, sir, statistics; very fond of them myself."
"I find, for instance," the first man went on, "that a drop of water is filled with little . . . with little . . . I forget just what you call them . . . little—er—things, every cubic inch containing—er—containing . . . let me see . . . "
​"Say a million," said the other thinker, encouragingly.
"Yes, a million, or possibly a billion . . . but at any rate, ever so many of them."
"Is it possible?" said the other. "But really, you know there are wonderful things in the world. Now, coal . . . take coal . . . "
"Very, good," said his friend, "let us take coal," settling back in his seat with the air of an intellect about to feed itself.
"Do you know that every ton of coal burnt in an engine will drag a train of cars as long as . . . I forget the exact length, but say a train of cars of such and such a length, and weighing, say so much . . . from . . . from . . . hum! for the moment the exact distance escapes me . . . drag it from . . . "
"From here to the moon," suggested the other.
"Ah, very likely; yes, from here to the moon. Wonderful, isn't it?"
"But the most stupendous calculation of all, sir, is in regard to the distance from the earth to the sun. Positively, sir, a cannon-ball—er—fired at the sun . . . "
"Fired at the sun," nodded the other, approvingly, as if he had often seen it done.
​"And travelling at the rate of . . . of . . . "
"Of three cents a mile," hinted the listener.
"No, no, you misunderstand me,—but travelling at a fearful rate, simply fearful, sir, would take a hundred million—no, a hundred billion—in short would take a scandalously long time in getting there———"
At this point I could stand no more. I interrupted—"Provided it were fired from Philadelphia," I said, and passed into the smoking-car.