OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Greek Independence Day: A National Day of Celebration

Greek Independence Day: A National Day of Celebration. Congressional Record: March 26, 1998 (Extensions of Remarks) Page E484. DOCID:cr26mr98-9.
HON. STEPHEN HORN
OF CALIFORNIA
Mr. HORN. Mr. Speaker, I want to join with my colleagues tonight to pay special recognition to this anniversary of the independence of Greece. This year, we join together again to honor the hard won independence of a land that will forever hold a special place in American culture. Also, I want to take this opportunity to thank Representatives Bilirakis and Maloney for their efforts to organize the House's celebration of this event tonight.
Mr. Speaker, more than 2,500 years ago the people of Greece began to formulate the ideas that now serve as the foundation for our system of government, science, philosophy, law, literature, and art. The gift of Greek culture to the world, and the special debt this nation owes to Greece, is priceless. The Greek tradition that began in the mists of time with Homer led to the Golden Age and later to the intellectual and aesthetic enrichment of the Roman Republic and Empire, the European Renaissance, and our own nation's founding principles.
We also share with Greece the triumphant experience of fighting for and winning independence. In 1821, after nearly 2,000 years of foreign rule, the people of Greece rose up and declared their independence from the Ottoman Empire. After nearly a decade of struggle, the Greek people won their freedom. Their cause was celebrated throughout the democratic world at the time, and continues to inspire us today.
Greece has contributed to this nation in other ways. It is difficult to find areas of this country where Greek-Americans have not contributed to the betterment of their communities. In my own area of Southern California, the vibrant Greek-American community has enriched all our lives. Recently, I was honored to take part in the annual celebration of the Hellenic-American Council of Southern California. Through this and many other excellent organizations, the Greek-American community has made important contributions to the United States.
In the Second World War, Greeks fought with Americans to turn back Nazi and Fascist aggression. After that war, Greece remained on the side of freedom and democracy, serving as an early bulwark against the spread of communist totalitarianism. The assistance provided to Greece beginning under the Truman Doctrine and later continued within the NATO alliance continued the strong link between our nations. This cooperation continues today, as both nations face the instability in the Balkans and other threats to peace in the region.
Again, Mr. Speaker, I want to extend my sincere good wishes to the people of Greece and those of Greek heritage on this happy occasion.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Greek National Anthem (unknown translation)

The "Hymn to Liberty" is a poem written by Dionýsios Solomós in 1823 that consists of 158 stanzas, set to music by Nikolaos Mantzaros. In 1865, the first two stanzas officially became the national anthem of Greece and later also that of the Republic of Cyprus.Warning: template has been deprecated.

### The Greek National Anthem

Σε γνωρίζω από την κόψη Του σπαθιού την τρομερή, Σε γνωρίζω από την όψη Που με βιά μετράει τη γη. Απ' τα κόκκαλα βγαλμένη Των Ελλήνων τα ιερά Και σαν πρώτα ανδρειωμένη Χαίρε, ω χαίρε Ελευθεριά! Και σαν πρώτα ανδρειωμένη Χαίρε, ω χαίρε Ελευθεριά! Και σαν πρώτα ανδρειωμένη Χαίρε, ω χαίρε Ελευθεριά!

### English Transliteration

Se gnorízo apó tin kópsi, Tu spathiú tin tromerí, Se gnorízo apó tin ópsi, Pu me viá metrái tin yi. Ap' ta kókkala vgalméni, Ton Ellínon ta ierá, Ke san próta andrioméni, Hére, o hére, Eleftheriá! Ke san próta andrioméni, Hére, o hére, Eleftheriá! Ke san próta andrioméni, Hére, o hére, Eleftheriá!

### English Translation

I know you by the dreadful edge of the sword, I know you by the gaze that measures the land with force. Born from the sacred bones of the Greeks and brave as in the old times Hail, oh hail, Liberty! And brave as in the old times Hail, oh hail, Liberty! And brave as in the old times Hail, oh hail, Liberty!
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Greeley v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
21 U.S. 257
Greeley v. United States

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Greely v. Thompson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
51 U.S. 225
Greely v. Thompson
THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.
Mr. Justice Catron did not sit at the trial in this court, being a stockholder and co-partner of a railroad company having a similar interest.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Green's Administratrix v. Creighton

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
64 U.S. 90
Green's Administratrix v. Creighton

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fuller v. Claflin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
93 U.S. 14
Fuller v. Claflin
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Arkansas.
Submitted on printed arguments by Mr. Benjamin T. Duval for the plaintiffs in error, and by Mr. Isaac Dayton for the defendants in error.
MR. JUSTICE HUNT delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fuller

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Fuller."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, taxonomy, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Fuller, Samuel
* Fuller, Thomas (1593-1667)
# Fuller v. Yentzer (94 U.S. 299)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
94 U.S. 299
Fuller v. Yentzer (94 U.S. 299)
APPEALS from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
Mr. E. B. Barnum and Mr. E. N. Dickerson for the appellants.
Mr. Walter B. Scates, contra.
MR. JUSTICE CLIFFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fuller v. Yentzer

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Fuller v. Yentzer."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Fuller v. Yentzer (94 U.S. 288)
* Fuller v. Yentzer (94 U.S. 299)
# Fuller v. Yentzer (94 U.S. 288)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
94 U.S. 288
Fuller v. Yentzer
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
Mr. E. B. Barnum and Mr. E. N. Dickerson for the appellants.
Mr. Walter B. Scates, contra.
MR. JUSTICE CLIFFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# God's Acre

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "God's Acre."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "God's Acre", a poem by Mary Elizabeth Blake
* "God's Acre", a poem by Annie Isabel Curwen
* "God's Acre", a poem by Murray McClymont
# God's Crucible

* related portals: Christian poetry.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
The world is in the melting pot,
What was is passing away;
And what will remain, when it cools again,
No man may safely say.
But of this we may be certain —
The Old Things have gone for aye;
The wood, and the hay, and the stubble, they
Have passed in the heat of the fray.
And what be the things that are left us?
"Gold and silver and precious stones"?
Or only a world into chaos hurled,
And cluttered with brave men's bones?
Have we added aught to the fuel
Of these fires of the wrath of God?
Have we had no part in the warping of heart
That has drenched the earth with blood?
But, whatever our sins, the purging
Has cleansed us and purified;
With heart and with brain we must build again
Things of proof that shall abide.
Oh, see that ye build securely
When the time for building comes —
With square-hewn blocks of Righteousness,
And corner stones of Faithfulness,
And girders strong of Righted Wrong,
And the blood of our Martyrdoms.
And — build on the One Foundation,
That shall make the building sure —
The Rock that was laid ere the world was made,
Build on Him, and ye build secure!
# God's Judgment on a Bishop

* "God's Judgment on a Bishop", in Metrical Tales and Other Poems (1805)
* "The Legend of Bishop Hatto", in Poems That Every Child Should Know (1904), edited by Mary Elizabeth Burt
# God's-Acre

This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
I like that ancient Saxon phrase, which calls The burial-ground God's-Acre! It is just; It consecrates each grave within its walls, And breathes a benison o'er the sleeping dust.
God's-Acre! Yes, that blessed name imparts Comfort to those, who in the grave have sown The seed that they had garnered in their hearts, Their bread of life, alas! no more their own.
Into its furrows shall we all be cast, In the sure faith, that we shall rise again At the great harvest, when the archangel's blast Shall winnow, like a fan, the chaff and grain.
Then shall the good stand in immortal bloom, In the fair gardens of that second birth; And each bright blossom mingle its perfume With that of flowers, which never bloomed on earth.
With thy rude ploughshare, Death, turn up the sod, And spread the furrow for the seed we sow; This is the field and Acre of our God, This is the place where human harvests grow!
# Historic Landmarks of the Deccan/Chapter 10

CHAPTER X.
AN OLD BATTLEFIELD OF BERAR.
THE early history of Balapur, like that of most respectable Indian villages, is " lost in the mists of antiquity." Even tradition is silent as to the name of its founder and the period of its foundation, helping us no further than the conjecture that it was founded by one of the rajas of olden times. But the old town was, from the date of its first mention in authentic history down to the time when British rule was firmly established in India, a place of importance from a military point of view. We are first introduced to it by Firishta, who informs us that when Khalaf Hasan Basri, in 1437 in the reign of Ala-ud-din Bahmani II, marched northwards from Daulatabad to meet Nasir Khan Faruqi of Khandesh, who had invaded Berar by the invitation of the treacherous nobles of that province, he sent the Khan-i-Jahan, governor of Berar under the Bahmani Sultan, to garrison Ellichpur and Balapur with his Deccani troops, apparently with a view to checking the irruptions of the Korkus with whom Nasir Khan had allied himself. Whether Balapur was attacked or not we are not told, but it is pretty certain that it did not fall; for Nasir Khan was, within a very short time, driven out of Berar.
More than a century and a half passes before we hear anything more of Balapur. In 1595 Ahmadnagar, the capital of the Nizam Shahi Sultans, was the scene of fearful struggles between the different parties in the state. Their mutual animosity reached such a pitch that one party committed the fatal error of appealing for aid to Sultan Murad, the second surviving son of the emperor Akbar, who was then in Gujarat awaiting the opportunity of interfering in the affairs of the Deccan. The prince and his commander-in-chief, the Khan-i-Khanan, at once marched southwards through Berar as far as Ahmadnagar, to which capital they laid siege. Those who had invited the prince to interfere now bitterly repented of their rash action, and, for a time at least, all parties were united in their opposition to the invader. The siege dragged on and the heroic endeavours of the Sultana Chand Bibi had already dis​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/185 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/186 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/187 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/188 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/189 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/190 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/191
# Historic Landmarks of the Deccan/Appendix

​APPENDIX.
DYNASTIC LISTS.
(i) — The Yadavas of Deogir.
Bhillama I. Jaitrapala I, son of (i). Singliana, son of (2), Jaitrapala II, son of (3), Krishna, son of Jaitrapala II. Mahadeo, son of Jaitrapala II. Kamchandra or Ramdeo, son of (4). Shankar, son of (6). Harpal, son-in-law of (6), put to death in 1318. (2) — The Kakatiyas of Warangal. Tribhuvanamalla Betmaraja. Prodaraja or Prolaraja, son of (i). Prataparudradeva I, son of (2). Mahadeo. Ganpati, son of (4). Rudrammadevi, wife of (5). Prataparudradeva II, grandson of (5). Krishna (? Kanhayya.) -The Hoysalas of Dvaravatipura or Dhorasamudra. Vinayaditya. Ereyanga, son of (i Ballala I, son of (2). Tribhuvanamalla Vishnuvardhana, son of (2). Tribhuvanamalla Nrisimha I, son of (4}. Tribhuvanamalla Vira Ballala II, son of (5). Nrisimha II, son of (6). Vira Someshvara, son of (7). Vira Nrisimha III, son of (8). 1292 (10) Vira Ballala III, son of (9). A.D. 1187 U) 1191 (2) 1210 (3) 1247 (4) 1260 (5) 1271 (6) 1309 (7) (8) (1) 1 150 (2) 1163 (3) (4) 1231 (5) 1257 (6) 1294 (7) 1325 (8) (3) — Ti 1048 (I) (2) 1103 (3) 1117 (4) "59 (;) n73 (6) 1224 (7) 1234 (8) 1254 (5) ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/245 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/246 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/247 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/248 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/249 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/250
# Historic Landmarks of the Deccan/Chapter 13

CHAPTER XIII.
THE SECOND MARATHA WAR IN THE DECCAN.
I. Assaye.
EARLY in the year 1803 the great Maratha chiefs of Central India were seriously alarmed by an event which directly threatened their independence. Baji Rao Peshwa, driven from his capital by the rebel Jaswant Rao Holkar, was a fugitive in British territory, a rival set up by the rebel occupied his place, and there was no prospect of a restoration but by the help of British bayonets. The price of that help was heavy, being no less than the sacrifice of independence and the acceptance of the position of a feudatory of the East India Company, but the fugitive had no choice but to pay it. Accordingly, on the last day of 1802, he signed the treaty of Bassein, whereby he surrendered his independence as the price of assistance, and in May, 1803, he was reinstated on the masnad at Poona, while Holkar retired to Malwa. Meanwhile Daulat Rao Sindhya and Raghuji Bhonsla had been in communication regarding the action to be taken by them as a protest against the treaty Of Bassein, for they contested the right of the Peshwa to conclude such a treaty without consulting the other members of the Maratha confederacy. Sindhya was at Burhanpur, and, though he endeavoured to conceal his preparations, his attitude was so threatening that he was called upon by the Governor-General, Lord Wellesley, to declare his intentions; to which demand he replied that he would answer after he had met Raghuji Bhonsla. Shortly after this Sindhya and Bhonsla joined forces and advanced southwards into the Nizam's dominions. By this time Major-General Arthur Wellesley, who had been detached from the Madras army with 8,000 infantry and 1,700 cavalry, and Colonel Stevenson with the Haidarabad Subsidiary Force, were ready to act against the allies, who had failed to induce Holkar to join them. In July Wellesley was encamped in the neighbourhood of Ahmadnagar, the old capital of the Nizam Shahi dynasty, Stevenson being on the Godavari; and by the beginning of August the allies had advanced to Malkapur in Berar. General Wellesley, who had full power as agent to the Qovernor-Genefal, ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/232 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/233 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/234 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/235 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/236 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/237 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/238 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/239 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/240 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/241 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/242 ​Page:Historic Landmarks of the Deccan.djvu/243
# Giles v. Little (134 U.S. 645)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
134 U.S. 645
Giles v. Little
Argued: March 17, 1890 --- Decided: April 7, 1890
[Statement of Case from pages 645-648 intentionally omitted]
J. M. Woolworth, for plaintiffs in error.
T. M. Marquette, Nathan S. Harwood, and John H. Ames, for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice GRAY, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Giles v. Harris

Giles v. Harris, 189 U.S. 475 (1903), was an early 20th century United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld a state constitution's requirements for voter registration and qualifications. Although the plaintiff accused the state of discriminating in practice against black citizens, the Court found that the requirements applied to all citizens and refused to undertake overseeing the state's process. Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
189 U.S. 475
Giles v. Harris a B
Argued: February 24, 1903. --- Decided: April 27, 1903
Mr. Wilford H. Smith for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 475-479 intentionally omitted]
Mr. W. A. Gunter for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 479-482 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Giles v. Little

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Giles v. Little."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Giles v. Little (104 U.S. 291)
* Giles v. Little (134 U.S. 645)
See also Little v. Giles.
# Giles v. Heysinger

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
150 U.S. 627
Giles v. Heysinger
Statement by Mr. Justice BROWN:
This was a bill in equity brought by Heysinger and one Christian H. Hershey, now represented by the administrator of his estate, against the appellants, trading under the name of Noyes, Smith & Co., to recover damages for the infringement of letters patent No. 218,300, issued August 5, 1879, to William Mills and Christian H. Hershey, for an improvement in hair crimpers.
In their specification the patentees state that 'this hair crimper is intended to be applied to the hair in the manner of the crimping papers formerly in common use, the ends being turned under out of sight, and the hair retained by the folds thus made.'
'It consists, essentially, of a strip of soft, nonelastic metal, preferably flat, covered with a fibrous coating, cemented thereto, so that when cut into proper lengths for use the ends will not fray out, but remain the same, into whatever number of pieces the crimper may be divided, thus rendering it specially adapted for use with children, where crimpers of different lengths are often required, while at the same time greatly simplifying and cheapening the cost of manufacture.'
The crimper consists of a core of what is known as 'gardeners' lead,' which is passed in long strips through a liquid cement known as 'dextrine,' and is then wound about by a braid of fibrous covering, and the adhesive material taken up in the passage through it of the leaden core is thus interposed between the fibrous covering and the soft metal core, making an adhesion between them, while leaving the outer surface of the braid soft and unsaturated. 'Were the fibrous surface thoroughly saturated with adhesive matter, the crimper would be comparatively useless, as the least moisture in the hair would cause its adhesion thereto.' The article is manufactured in long strips, which are laid away and dried, after which they are run through a cutting machine, which cuts the strip into pieces of equal length, laying them out in dozens, which are then bundled and boxed for the market.
The first claim of the patent-the only one charged to have been infringed-reads as follows: 'A hair crimper consisting of a nonelastic metal core, C, and braided covering, A, said covering, A, being cemented to said core, C, throughout its entire length, substantially as described.'
Upon the hearing in the court below, a final decree was entered for $360.85, with costs, from which decree defendants appealed to this court.
J. J. Jennings, for appellants.
Augustus B. Stoughton, for appellees.
Mr. Justice BROWN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse