OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Endicott-Johnson Corporation v. Smith/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
266 U.S. 291
Endicott-Johnson Corporation v. Smith
Argued: Oct. 13, 1924. --- Decided: Nov 17, 1924
This case, like Endicott-Johnson Corporation v. Encyclopedia Press, Inc. (No. 41), 266 U.S. 285, 45 S.C.t. 61, 69 L. Ed. --, just decided, involves the constitutional validity of section 1391 of the New York Code of Civil Procedure. Smith v. Endicott-Johnson Corporation (Sup.) 189 N. Y. S. 673; Id., 199 App. Div. 194, 192 N. Y. S. 121; Id., 234 N. Y. 628, 138 N. E. 474. It is in all respects similar to the Encyclopedia Press Case and governed by the decision therein.
Affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Endicott Johnson Corporation v. Perkins

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
317 U.S. 501
Endicott Johnson Corporation v. Perkins
Argued: Nov. 20, 1942. --- Decided: Jan 11, 1943
Mr. Howard A. Swartwood, of Endicott, N.Y., for petitioners.
Mr. Paul Freund, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Endicott-Johnson Corporation v. Encyclopedia Press

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
266 U.S. 285
Endicott-Johnson Corporation v. Encyclopedia Press
Argued: Oct. 7, 1924. --- Decided: Nov 17, 1924
Mr. Maurice E. Page, of Endicott, N. Y., for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Thomas B. Merchant, of Binghamton, N. Y., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice SANFORD delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Endowment Benev Association of Kansas v. Kansas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
120 U.S. 103
Endowment Benev Association of Kansas v. Kansas
G. W. De Camp, for plaintiff in error.
Chas. B. Smith, for defendant in error.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Trade Commission v. Crafts

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
355 U.S. 9
Federal Trade Commission v. Crafts
See 355 U.S. 885, 78 S.Ct. 146.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Messrs. Charles H. Weston, Earl W. Kintner and Robert B. Dawkins, for petitioner.
Mr. Christopher M. Jenks, for respondent.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Trade Commission v. Crafts/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
355 U.S. 9
Federal Trade Commission v. Crafts
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is reversed. Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Perkins, 317 U.S. 501, 63 S.Ct. 339, 87 L.Ed. 424; Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. Walling, 327 U.S. 186, 66 S.Ct. 494, 90 L.Ed. 614.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Trade Commission v. Claire Furnace Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
274 U.S. 160
Federal Trade Commission v. Claire Furnace Company
Argued: Nov. 24, 1925. --- Decided: April 18, 1927
[Argument of Counsel from pages 160-162 intentionally omitted]
The Attorney General and Mr. W. D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for appellants.
Messrs. Paul D. Cravath, of New York City, and W. D. Stewart, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 163-164 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Company

United States Supreme Court
380 U.S. 374
Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Company
Argued: Dec. 10, 1964. --- Decided: April 5, 1965
[Syllabus from pages 374-375 intentionally omitted]
Philip B. Heymann, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
John F. Sonnett, New York City, for respondents.
Mr. Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Trade Commission v. Curtis Publishing Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
260 U.S. 568
Federal Trade Commission v. Curtis Publishing Company
Argued: Nov. 17, 1922. --- Decided: Jan 8, 1923
Mr. Solicitor General Beck and Adrien F. Busick, both of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 569-572 intentionally omitted]
Mr. John G. Milburn, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Trade Commission v. Consolidated Foods Corporation

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, news, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
380 U.S. 592
Federal Trade Commission v. Consolidated Foods Corporation
Argued: March 10 and 11, 1965. --- Decided: April 28, 1965
Archibald Cox, Sol. Gen., for petitioner.
Daniel Walker, Chicago, Ill., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fairview Boys and their Rivals

Third book in the Fairview Boys series
FAIRVIEW BOYS AND THEIR RIVALS
OR
BOB BOUNCER'S SCHOOLDAYS
BY
FREDERICK GORDON
AUTHOR OF ""THE YOUNG CRUSOES OP PINE ISLAND," "SAMMY BROWN'S TREASURE HUNT," ETC.
CHARLES E. GRAHAM & CO.
Bob Ran with the Pail to a Man at the Broken-in Door Frontispiece
CONTENTS
| CHAPTER | CHAPTER | PAGE |
| I. | Three Chums | 7 |
| II. | The First Day at School | 18 |
| III. | The Lost Letters | 30 |
| IV. | Something of a Mystery | 38 |
| V. | The Big Bonfire | 50 |
| VI. | Bombarded | 56 |
| VII. | The Spelling Contest | 64 |
| VIII. | The Mad Bull | 71 |
| IX. | The Nutting Party | 79 |
| X. | "The Day of Their Lives" | 85 |
| XI. | Robbery | 93 |
| XII. | Bob Bouncer's Clew | 100 |
| XIII. | An Exciting Hour | 108 |
| XIV. | Fire | 115 |
| XV. | The Capture—Conclusion | 124 |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fairness for American Families Act (H.R. 2668; 113th Congress)

* related portals: United States Congress.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
H.R. 2668 as introduced
113th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 2668
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 11, 2013
Mr. Young of Indiana (for himself, Mr. Griffin of Arkansas, Mr. Boustany, Mr. Brady of Texas, Mrs. Black, Mr. Camp, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, Mr. Nunes, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Reichert, Mr. Schock, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Renacci, Mr. Marchant, Mr. Reed, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin, Mr. Paulsen, Mr. Roskam, Ms. Jenkins, Mr. Smith of Nebraska, Mr. Gerlach, Mr. Price of Georgia, and Mrs. Blackburn) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
A BILL
To delay the application of the individual health insurance mandate.

# Section 1. Short title

This Act may be cited as the “Fairness for American Families Act”.

# Sec. 2. Delay in application of individual health insurance mandate
## (a) In general–

Section 5000A(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking “2013” and inserting “2014”.

## (b) Conforming amendments–

    (1) Section 5000A(c)(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986is amended—
       (A) by striking “2014” in clause (i)and inserting “2015”, and
       (B) by striking “2015” in clauses (ii)and (iii)and inserting “2016”.
    (2) Section 5000A(c)(3)(B) of such Codeis amended—
       (A) by striking “2014” and inserting “2015”, and
       (B) by striking “2015” (prior to amendment by subparagraph (A)) and inserting “2016”.
    (3) Section 5000A(c)(3)(D) of such Codeis amended—
       (A) by striking “2016” and inserting “2017”, and
       (B) by striking “2015” and inserting “2016”.
    (4) Section 5000A(e)(1)(D) of such Codeis amended—
       (A) by striking “2014” and inserting “2015”, and
       (B) by striking “2013” and inserting “2014”.

## (c) Effective date–

The amendments made by this section shall take effect as if included in section 1501 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
287 U.S. 474
Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Company
Argued: Nov. 8, 1932. --- Decided: Jan 9, 1933
Messrs. Paul Y. Davis and Henry H. Hornbrook, both of Indianapolis, Ind., for petitioner.
Mr. Connor Hall, of Huntington, W. Va., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 475-476 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fairport, Painesville, & Eastern Railroad Company v. Meredith

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
292 U.S. 589
Fairport, Painesville, & Eastern Railroad Company v. Meredith
Argued: May 4, 7, 1934. --- Decided: June 4, 1934
Messrs. Atlee Pomerene, of Cleveland, Ohio, Elbert F. Blakely, of Painesville, Ohio, and Thomas M. Kirby, of Cleveland, ohio, for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from page 590-591 intentionally omitted]
Mr. David F. Anderson, of Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Enriquez v. Go-Tiongco

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
220 U.S. 307
Enriquez v. Go-Tiongco
Argued: March 13, 1911. --- Decided: April 3, 1911
Messrs. Jackson H. Ralston, Frederick L. Siddons, and William E. Richardson for appellants.
Messrs. Aldis B. Browne, Alexander Britton, and Evans Browne for appellees.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Enriquez v. Enriquez

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
222 U.S. 123
Enriquez v. Enriquez
Argued: and submitted October 31, 1911. --- Decided: December 4, 1911
Messrs. Jackson H. Ralston, Frederick L. Siddons, and William E. Richardson for appellants.
Mr. Allison D. Gibbs for appellees.
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ensign Knightley and Other Stories

Mr. Mason's long stories had hardly prepared us for the particular excellence of this volume. [...] he is wont to deal in brief with rather complicated themes—but the sense of strain is never too obvious. Adventure is the dominant note in them, but not merely the adventure of sword and gun; and the workmanship, the play of motive and character, place them entirely outside the range of schoolboy literature. —Extract from the review in The Bookman September 1901. full review(s) in the Discussion page.
Ensign Knightley
And Other Stories
By A. E. W. MASON
Author of "The Courtship of Morrice
Buckler," "The Watchers," "Parson
Kelly," etc.
NEW YORK FREDERICK A. STOKES COMPANY PUBLISHERS
Copyright 1901, By A. E. W. Mason

### CONTENTS

* Ensign Knightley 1
* The Man of Wheels 32
* Mr. Mitchelbourne's Last Escape 62
* The Coward 88
* The Deserter 115
* The Crossed Gloves 137
* The Shuttered House 156
* Keeper of the Bishop 178
* The Cruise of the "Willing Mind" 186
* How Barrington Returned to Johannesburg 207
* Hatteras 220
* The Princess Joceliande 252
* A Liberal Education 285
* The Twenty-Kroner Story 301
* The Fifth Picture 307
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1948, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 75 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Enquiry into Plants/Volume 2

THE LOEB CLASSICAL LIBRARY
EDITED BY
E. CAPPS, Ph.D., LL.D.T. E. PAGE, Litt.D.W. H. D. ROUSE,Litt.D
THEOPHRASTUS
ENQUIRY INTO PLANTS
II
page
THEOPHRASTUS
ENQUIRY INTO PLANTS
AND MINOR WORKS ON ODOURS AND WEATHER SIGNS
WITH AN ENGLISH TRANSLATION BY
SIR ARTHUR HORT, Bart., M.A
FORMERLY FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE
IN TWO VOLUMES
II
LONDON: WILLIAM HEINEMANN NEW YORK: G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS MCMXVI
page
CONTENTS
Layout 2
# Finch v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
102 U.S. 269
Finch v. United States
APPEAL from the Court of Claims.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Nathaniel Wilson and Mr. Lewis Abraham for the appellants.
The Solicitor-General for the United States.
Mr. JUSTICE SWAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Financial and Fiscal Commission 1993 Constitutional Provisions Repeal Act, 1997

* related portals: Acts of the Parliament of South Africa.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Act No. 96 of 1997. First published on 17 December 1997 in Government Gazette No. 18511, and came into force on 1 January 1998.
Act
To repeal certain provisions of the 1993 Constitution relating to the Financial and Fiscal Commission; and for matters in connection therewith.
(Afrikaans text signed by the President.) (Assented to 26 November 1997.)
Be it enacted by the Parliament of the Republic of South Africa, as follows:―
Repeal of sections 199(1), 200(1), (3) and (5) to (11) and 201 to 206 of Act 200 of 1993
1. Sections 199(1), 200(1), (3) and (5) to (11) and 201 to 206 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1993 (Act No. 200 of 1993), are hereby repealed.
Short title and commencement
2. This Act is called the Financial and Fiscal Commission 1993 Constitutional Provisions Repeal Act, 1997, and takes effect when the Financial and Fiscal Commission Act, 1997, takes effect.
This work is in the public domain because it was created and first published in South Africa and it is an official text of a legislative, administrative or legal nature, or an official translation of such a text.
According to the Copyright Act, 1978, § 12 (8) (a), "No copyright shall subsist in official texts of a legislative, administrative or legal nature, or in official translations of such texts."
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fincastle resolutions

* information about this edition.
* related portals: Constitutional documents, Virginia.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
The Fincastle Resolutions was a statement of resolutions adopted by a committee of fifteen delegates in Fincastle County, Virginia Colony, on January 20, 1775.
County of Fincastle, Resolutions
Excerpt:
We are ready and willing to contribute all in our power for the support of his Majesty's Government, if applied to constitutionally, and when the grants are made by our own Representatives, but cannot think of submitting our liberty or property to the power of a venal British Parliament, or to the will of a corrupt Ministry.
We by no means desire to shake off our duty or allegiance to our lawful Sovereign, but on the contrary, shall ever glory in being the loyal subjects of a Protestant Prince, descended from such illustrious progenitors, so long as we can enjoy the free exercise of our Religion as Protestants, and our Liberties and Properties as British, subjects.
But if no pacifick measures shall be proposed or adopted by Great Britain, and our enemies will attempt to dragoon us out of those inestimable privileges, which we are entitled to as subjects, and to reduce us to a state of slavery, we declare that we are deliberately and resolutely determined never to surrender them to any power upon earth, but at the expense of our lives.
Full Text: Preston, Thomas L. Historical Sketches and Reminiscences of an Octogenarian. Richmond, Va.: B. F. Johnson Publishing Co., 1900, pp. 24-28.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Finance Guaranty Company v. Oppenhimer

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
276 U.S. 10
Finance Guaranty Company v. Oppenhimer
Argued: Jan. 13, 1928. --- Decided: Jan 23, 1928
Mr. S. M. Brandt, of Norfolk, Va., for petitioner.
Mr. Joseph M. Hurt, of Richmond, Va., for respondent.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fielding

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Fielding."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.

## articles

* Fielding, Antony Vandyke Copley
* Fielding, Henry (1707-1754)
* Fielding, Henry Borron
* Fielding, John
* Fielding, Nathan Theodore
* Fielding, Newton Smith
* Fielding, Sarah
* Fielding, Thales
* Fielding, Theodore Henry Adolphus
* Fielding, Thomas
# Field v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
34 U.S. 182
Field v. United States

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fielden v. Illinois

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
143 U.S. 452
Fielden v. Illinois
STATEMENT BY MR. JUSTICE HARLAN.
Benj. F. Butler and Moses Salomon, for plaintiff in error.
George Hunt and E. S. Smith, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ephemera (Buck)/To the Aphrodite

TO THE APHRODITE
Thou art the source of all the loves; truly thou art very fair. Yet who could say I am not fairer still?
Thy rounded limbs are cold like snow while mine are yielding and warm, glowing with quivering life at a lover's touch. Thy lips which seem so beautiful are white and hard, while mine are like red poppies, tremulous and sweet. No perfumed breath exhales from thee, nor canst thou gasp thine ecstasy into a silenced ear.
Yet I adore thee, for thou art immortal and divine. In the twilight of the sanctuary, thy pure and flawless limbs will glow through the eddying incense after my own, so beautiful now, have crumbled into dust. Men will look up to thee long after remembrance of me has passed away, and still thou wilt inflame their quickening desire when my frail shade is lost among the dead.
# Ephesians (Bible)

Ephesians is a book in the Bible.
English-language translations of Pros Ephesious include:
* Bible (Wycliffe)/Ephesians (1380s)
* Bible (Tyndale)/Ephesians (1526)
* Bible (King James)/Ephesians (1611)
* Bible (American Standard)/Ephesians (1901)
* Bible (World English)/Ephesians (in progress since 1997)
* Bible (Wikisource)/Ephesians (in progress since 2006)
* Bible (Literal Standard Version)/Ephesians (2020)
# Epicede (Swinburne)

* Epicede (James Lorimer Graham died at Florence, April 30, 1876.)
* Epicede "As a vesture shalt thou change them, said the prophet"