OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Antigone (Sophocles)

* related portals: Ancient Greek drama.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
Ἀντιγόνη (Antigonē) is a tragedy by Sophocles. In the play, Antigone plans to bury the body of her brother Polyneices in defiance of an edict by King Creon.
Antigone is one of the three "Theban" plays of Sophocles, treating the story of Oedipus and his children. However, the three plays were not created as a trilogy, and were written out of chronological sequence at different times in Sophocles' career. one or more editions are available in a spoken word format.
English-language translations of Ἀντιγόνη include:
* Antigone, translated by Theodore Alois Buckley (1849)
* Antigone, translated by E. H. Plumptre (1878)
* Antigone, translated by Lewis Campbell [1883] (1906)
* Antigone, translated by Richard Claverhouse Jebb [1888] (1917)
* The Antigone of Sophocles, translated by Joseph E. Harry (1911)
* Antigone, translated by Francis Storr (1912)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago. Translations or editions published later may be copyrighted.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Antigone

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Antigone."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Antigone, a play by Sophocles. Multiple English translations exist.
* Antigone, a play by Thomas May (16??)
* “Antigone 1.”, by Leonhard Schmitz in Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, 1870.
* “Antigone 2.”, in Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, 1870.
* "Antigone," in A Dictionary of Music and Musicians, (ed.) by George Grove, London: MacMillan & Co., Ltd. (1900)
* "Antigone," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Antigone," in The New Student's Reference Work, Chicago: F.E. Compton and Co. (1914)
# Anticipation

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Anticipation."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Anticipation", a poem by Emily Brontë
* "Anticipation", a poem by Clark Ashton Smith
* Anticipation, a satirical pamphlet by Richard Tickell
* Anticipations, a work by Herbert George Wells
* "Anticipation", a poem by William Wordsworth
# Anticipation (Brontë)

"How beautiful the earth is still"
* "Anticipation" in Poems by Currer, Ellis, and Acton Bell (1846)
* "Anticipation" in The Complete Poems of Emily Brontë (1908)
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume III/Anti-Marcion/On the Resurrection of the Flesh/XXXVIII

Chapter XXXVIII.—Christ, by Raising the Dead, Attested in a Practical Way the Doctrine of the Resurrection of the Flesh.
After the Lord’s words, what are we to think of the purport of His actions, when He raises dead persons from their biers and their graves? To what end did He do so? If it was only for the mere exhibition of His power, or to afford the temporary favour of restoration to life, it was really no great matter for Him to raise men to die over again. If, however, as was the truth, it was rather to put in secure keeping men’s belief in a future resurrection, then it must follow from the particular form of His own examples, that the said resurrection will be a bodily one. I can never allow it to be said that the resurrection of the future, being destined for the soul only, did then receive these preliminary illustrations of a raising of the flesh, simply because it would have been impossible to have shown the resurrection of an invisible soul except by the resuscitation of a visible substance. They have but a poor knowledge of God, who suppose Him to be only capable of doing what comes within the compass of their own thoughts; and after all, they cannot but know full well what His capability has ever been, if they only make acquaintance with the writings of John. For unquestionably he, who has exhibited to our sight the martyrs’ hitherto disembodied souls resting under the altar, was quite able to display them before our eyes rising without a body of flesh. I, however, for my part prefer (believing) that it is impossible for God to practise deception (weak as He only could be in respect of artifice), from any fear of seeming to have given preliminary proofs of a thing in a way which is inconsistent with His actual disposal of the thing; nay more, from a fear that, since He was not powerful enough to show us a sample of the resurrection without the flesh, He might with still greater infirmity be unable to display (by and by) the full accomplishment of the sample in the self-same substance of the flesh. No example, indeed, is greater than the thing of which it is a sample. Greater, however, it is, if souls with their body are to be raised as the evidence of their resurrection without the body, so as that the entire salvation of man in soul and body should become a guarantee for only the half, the soul; whereas the condition in all examples is, that which would be deemed the less—I mean the resurrection of the soul only—should be the foretaste, as it were, of the rising of the flesh also at its appointed time. And therefore, according to our estimate of the truth, those examples of dead persons who were raised by the Lord were indeed a proof of the resurrection both of the flesh and of the soul,—a proof, in fact, that this gift was to be denied to neither substance. Considered, however, as examples only, they expressed all the less significance—less, indeed, than Christ will express at last—for they were not raised up for glory and immortality, but only for another death.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Rev. vi. 9–11.
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume III/Anti-Marcion/Scorpiace/Chapter IV

Chapter IV.
If, therefore, it is evident that from the beginning this kind of worship has both been forbidden—witness the commands so numerous and weighty—and that it has never been engaged in without punishment following, as examples so numerous and impressive show, and that no offence is counted by God so presumptuous as a trespass of this sort, we ought further to perceive the purport of both the divine threatenings and their fulfilments, which was even then commended not only by the not calling in question, but also by the enduring of martyrdoms, for which certainly He had given occasion by forbidding idolatry. For otherwise martyrdoms would not take place. And certainly He had supplied, as a warrant for these, His own authority, willing those events to come to pass for the occurrence of which He had given occasion. At present (it is important), for we are getting severely stung concerning the will of God, and the scorpion repeats the prick, denying the existence of this will, finding fault with it, so that he either insinuates that there is another god, such that this is not his will, or none the less overthrows ours, seeing such is his will, or altogether denies this will of God, if he cannot deny Himself. But, for our part, contending elsewhere about God, and about all the rest of the body of heretical teaching, we now draw before us definite lines for one form of encounter, maintaining that this will, such as to have given occasion for martyrdoms, is that of not another god than the God of Israel, on the ground of the commandments relating to an always forbidden, as well as of the judgments upon a punished, idolatry. For if the keeping of a command involves the suffering of violence, this will be, so to speak, a command about keeping the command, requiring me to suffer that through which I shall be able to keep the command, violence namely, whatever of it threatens me when on my guard against idolatry. And certainly (in the case supposed) the Author of the command extorts compliance with it. He could not, therefore, have been unwilling that those events should come to pass by means of which the compliance will be manifest. The injunction is given me not to make mention of any other god, not even by speaking,—as little by the tongue as by the hand,—to fashion a god, and not to worship or in any way show reverence to another than Him only who thus commands me, whom I am both bid fear that I may not be forsaken by Him, and love with my whole being, that I may die for Him. Serving as a soldier under this oath, I am challenged by the enemy. If I surrender to them, I am as they are. In maintaining this oath, I fight furiously in battle, am wounded, hewn in pieces, slain. Who wished this fatal issue to his soldier, but he who sealed him by such an oath?

## Footnotes

* ↑ An allusion to what occurred in the games, there being lines to mark the space within which the contests were to be waged.—Tr.
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume VII/The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles

THE TEACHING OF THE TWELVE APOSTLES.

## Contents

* Introductory Notice
* Introductory Notice by Professor M. B. Riddle, D.D
* The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume VII/Lactantius/The Divine Institutes/The Epitome of the Divine Institutes/The Preface

The Preface.—The Plan and Purport of the Whole Epitome, And of the Institutions.
Although the books of the Divine Institutions which we wrote a long time since to illustrate the truth and religion, may so prepare and mould the minds of the readers, that their length may not produce disgust, nor their copiousness be burthensome; nevertheless you desire, O brother Pentadius, that an epitome of them should be made for you, I suppose for this reason, that I may write something to you, and that your name may be rendered famous by my work, such as it is. I will comply with your desire, although it seems a difficult matter to comprise within the compass of one book those things which have been treated of in seven large volumes. For the whole matter becomes less full when so great a multitude of subjects is to be compressed within a narrow space; and it becomes less clear by its very brevity, especially since many arguments and examples, on which the elucidation of the proofs depends, must of necessity be omitted, since their copiousness is so great, that even by themselves they are enough to make up a book. And when these are removed, what can appear useful, what plain? But I will strive as much as the subject permits, both to contract that which is diffuse and to shorten that which is long; in such a manner, however, that in this work, in which truth is to be brought to light, matter may not seem to be wanting for copiousness, nor clearness for understanding it.

## Footnotes

* ↑ [A specimen of the abridgments made by authors and editors, owing to the great expense of books in manuscript. They have been sources of great injury to literature.]
* ↑ [We have here only a fragment of the Epitome The rest is lost.]
* ↑ [Christian morals were now to be taught openly in schools: hence the need of such manuals.]
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume VII/The Second Epistle of Clement/Introductory Notice

Introductory Notice
to the Homily Known as
the Second Epistle of Clement.
It is gratifying that our series is marked by tokens of critical progress, and not less cheering tokens of scientific research. The clearing-up of much that has perplexed us about Hermas; the Bryennios discovery; and, not least, the completion of this fragment, which has long been a scandal to patristic inquiry,—are surely such tokens. They enrich the reader with definite ideas on many collateral subjects. May they not stimulate American scholarship and American affluence to fresh enterprises of the same character for the advancement of learning, and the glory of the world’s Redeemer and Illuminator?
The very early date to which this homily is now assigned makes its slightest allusions to the New-Testament canon of very great importance. I have ventured to indicate a few such, even where they may be mere allusions, not textual quotations: as, e.g., on p. 517, at notes 20 and 22, slight indications of a reference to the Second Epistle of St. Peter and to the Apocalypse.
I shall have occasion to refer to this work in the elucidation of the Liturgies which are to follow. If it be, as Bishop Lightfoot supposes, a homily of the second century, it may lend important retrospective aid to the student of these volumes in other particulars; but, having entrusted this interesting relic to the editorial care of a most competent scholar, I shall not presume to anticipate his judgment in any matter.

## Footnotes

* ↑ If this reference to 2 Pet. iii. 9 be probable, it is one of the earliest testimonies to the genuine character of that Epistle. The true Clement has two references to the same (pp. 8 and 11, vol. i., this series), and Justin also (vol. i. p. 240) is credited with a similar reference to 2 Peter and the Apocalypse. See Lardner, Credib., vol. ii. p. 123 et seq.
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume VII/The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles/Introductory Notice by Professor M. B. Riddle, D.D

Introductory Notice by Professor M. B. Riddle, D.D.
____________________

## Contents

* Section 1
* Section 2
* Section 3
* Section 4
* Section 5
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume VII/The Second Epistle of Clement

AN ANCIENT HOMILY,
COMMONLY STYLED
THE SECOND EPISTLE OF CLEMENT.

## Contents

* Introductory Notice
* Introductory Notice by Professor M. B. Riddle, D.D
* The Homily
# Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography/Riddle, George

Edition of 1900.
​RIDDLE, George, elocutionist, b. in Charlestown, Mass., 22 Sept., 1853. He was graduated at Harvard in 1874, made his first appearance as a reader in Boston in that year, and in 1875 made his début as an actor in that city, playing Romeo after which he became connected with stock-companies in Boston, Montreal, and Philadelphia. From 1878 till 1881 he was instructor in elocution at Harvard. He appeared as Œdipus in the “Œdipus Tyrannus” of Sophocles at Harvard in May, 1881, which was the first production in this country of a Greek play in the original. Mr. Riddle has given readings in the principal cities of the United States, the most successful of which are Shakespeare's “Midsummer-Night's Dream” with Mendelssohn's music, Byron's “Manfred” with Schumann's music, and the “Œdipus Tyrannus” with the music of John K. Paine.
# Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography/Richardson, William Adams

Edition of 1900.
​RICHARDSON, William Adams, jurist, b. in Tyngsborough, Mass., 2 Nov., 1821; d. in Washington, 19 Oct., 1896. He was graduated at Harvard, and in the law department there, was licensed to practise, and was judge-advocate and governor's aid in Massachusetts. He was president of the common council of Lowell in 1853-'4, of the Wameset bank, and of the Mechanics' association. He was appointed to revise the statutes of Massachusetts in 1855, and subsequently chosen by the legislature to edit the annual supplements of the general ​statutes, which he continued to do for twenty-two years. He became judge of probate in 1856, and was judge of probate and insolvency from 1858 till 1872. He declined a superior court judgeship in 1869, and the same year became assistant secretary of the U. S. treasury. He went to Europe as a financial agent of the government in 1871 to negotiate for the sale of the funded loan of the United States, and made the first contract abroad for the sale of the bonds. He became secretary of the treasury in 1873, resigning in 1874 to accept a seat on the bench of the U. S. court of claims, of which he became chief justice in 1885. In 1863-'75 he was an overseer of Harvard, and he was lecturer and professor in Georgetown law-school, D. C. Columbian university gave him the degree of LL. D. in 1873. His publications include “The Banking Laws of Massachusetts” (Lowell, 1855); “Supplement to the General Statutes of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,” with George P. Sanger (Boston, 1860-'82); “Practical Information concerning the Debt of the United States” (Washington, D. C., 1872); and “National Banking Laws” (1872); and he prepared and edited a “Supplement to the Revised Statutes of the United States” (1881); and “History of the Court of Claims” (1882-'5).
# Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography/Riddle, Matthew Brown

Edition of 1900.
​RIDDLE, Matthew Brown, clergyman, b. in Pittsburg, Pa., 17 Oct., 1836. He was graduated at Jefferson college, Pa., in 1852, and at the New Brunswick theological seminary in 1859, after which he studied at Heidelberg. In 1861 he was chaplain of the 2d New Jersey regiment, and in 1862-'9 he was pastor successively of Dutch Reformed churches in Hoboken and Newark, N. J. He travelled in Europe from 1869 till 1871, and in the latter year was appointed professor of New Testament exegesis in the theological seminary of Hartford, Conn. In 1887 he accepted the same chair in Western theological seminary, Alleghany, Pa. Franklin and Marshall college, Pa., gave him the degree of D. D. in 1870. He was an original member of the New Testament revision committee formed in 1871, translated and edited the epistles to the Romans, Galatians, Ephesians, and Colossians in the American edition of Lange's “Commentary” (New York, 1869; new ed., 1886); contributed to Rev. Dr. Philip Schaff's “Popular Illustrated Commentary on the New Testament” (4 vols., New York and Edinburgh, 1878-'83), and to his “International Revision Commentary” (New York, 1882); edited the gospels of Mark and Luke for the American edition of H. A. W. Meyer's “Commentary” (New York, 1884); revised and edited Edward Robinson's “Greek Harmony of the Gospels” (Boston, 1885), and Robinson's “English Harmony” (1886); and edited parts of Bishop Arthur Cleveland Coxe's edition of the “Ante-Nicene Fathers,” contributing the “Teaching of the Twelve Apostles” and the “Second Clement” (Buffalo, 1886); Augustine's “Harmony of the Gospels” (New York, 1888); and Chrysostom's “Homilies on Matthew,” in “Nicene Fathers” (1888). With Rev. John E. Todd, D. D., he prepared the notes on the International Sunday-school lessons for the Congregational publishing society of Boston in 1877-'81.
# Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography/Rideing, William Henry

Edition of 1900.
​RIDEING, William Henry, author, b. in Liverpool, England, 17 Feb., 1853. His father was an officer in the service of the Cunard line of steamers. After the death of his mother the son went to Chicago, Ill., where he remained until 1870. He early began writing for the press, and soon became connected with several journals. In 1874 he gave up newspaper work to devote himself entirely to literature and magazine writing. He made several trips to Europe and elsewhere with different artists to obtain material on special subjects. In 1878 he served as special correspondent with the Wheeler surveying expedition in Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, California, and Arizona. In 1881-'3 Mr. Rideing edited “Dramatic Notes” in London, England. On his return he again entered journalism in Boston, where he still remains (1898). Among his publications are “Pacific Railways Illustrated” (New York, 1878); “A-Saddle in the Wild West” (London, 1879); “Stray Moments with Thackeray” (New York, 1880); “Boys in the Mountains” (1882); “Boys Coastwise” (1884); “Thackeray's London” (London, 1885); “Young Folks' History of London” (Boston, 1885); “A Little Upstart” (1885); and “The Boyhood of Living Authors” (1887).
# Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography/Richardson, William Alexander

Edition of 1900.
​RICHARDSON. William Alexander. senator. b. in Fayette county. Ky., 11 Oct.. 1811: d. in Quincy. Ill., 27 Dec., 1875. He was educated at Transylvania university. came to the bar at nineteen years of age. and settled in Illinois. He became state attorney in 1835. was in the legislature several terms. serving as its speaker. and was a presidential elector on the Polk and Dallas ticket in 1844. He entered the U. S. army as captain of an Illinois company in 1846. and was promoted major for gallantry at Buena Vista. He was elected to congress as a Democrat in 1846. served in 1847—'56. when he resigned. and in 1863 was chosen U. S. senator to ﬁll the unexpired term of Stephen A. Douglas. lie was a delegate to the New York Democratic convention in 1868. but after that date retired from public life.
# Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography/Richardson, William Merchant

Edition of 1900.
​RICHARDSON, William Merchant, jurist, b. in Pelham, N. H., 4 Jan., 1774; d. in Chester, N. H., 3 March, 1838. He was graduated at Harvard in 1797, studied law, and settled in Groton, Mass. He was elected to congress as a Federalist in 1811, and served one year, when he resigned and removed to Portsmouth. He was at once appointed chief justice of New Hampshire, and discharged the duties of that office for twenty-two years. He was a jurist of great industry, talent, and information, and was highly regarded for his inflexible integrity. Dartmouth gave him the degree of LL. D. He is the author of the “New Hampshire Justice” (Concord, 1824) and “The Town Officer” (1824) and was co-reporter of the “New Hampshire Superior Court Cases,” of which the reports of several volumes are his alone (11 vols., 1819-'44). See his “Life,” (Concord, 1839).
# Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography/Riddle, Albert Gallatin

Edition of 1900.
​RIDDLE, Albert Gallatin, lawyer, b. in Monson, Mass., 28 May, 1816. His father removed to Geauga county, Ohio, in 1817, where the son received a common-school education, studied law, was admitted to the bar in 1840, practised law, and was prosecuting attorney from 1840 till 1846. He served in the legislature in 1848-'9, and called the first Free-soil convention in Ohio in 1848. In 1850 he removed to Cleveland, was elected prosecuting attorney in 1856, defended the Oberlin slave-rescuers in 1859, and was elected to congress as a Republican, serving from 4 July, 1861, till 3 March, 1863. He made speeches then in favor of arming slaves, the first on this subject that were delivered in congress, and others on emancipation in the District of Columbia and in vindication of President Lincoln. In October, 1863, he was appointed U. S. consul at Matanzas. Since 1864 he has practised law in Washington. D. C., and, under a retainer of the state department, aided in the prosecution of John H. Surratt for the murder of President Lincoln. In 1877 he was appointed law-officer to the District of Columbia, which office he now (1898) holds. For several years, from its organization, he had charge of the law department in Howard university. Mr. Riddle is the author of “Students and Lawyers,” lectures (Washington, 1873); “Hart Ridgely, a Story of Northern Ohio” (Boston, 1873); “The Portrait, a Romance of Cuyahoga Valley” (1874); “Alice Brand, a Tale of the Capitol” (New York, 1875); “Life, Character, and Public Services of James A. Garfield” (Cleveland, 1880); “The House of Ross” (Boston, 1881); “Castle Gregory” (Cleveland, 1882); “Hart and his Bear” (Washington, 1883); “The Sugar-Makers of the West Woods” (Cleveland, 1885); “The Hunter of the Chagrin” (1882); “Mark Loan, a Tale of the Western Reserve” (1883); “Old Newberry and the Pioneers” (1884); “Speeches and Arguments” (Washington, 1886); and “Life of Benjamin F. Wade” (Cleveland, 1886).
# Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography/Riddle, George Reade

Edition of 1900.
​RIDDLE, George Reade, senator, b. in Newcastle, Del., in 1817; d. in Washington. D. C., 29 March, 1867. He was educated at Delaware college, studied engineering, and engaged in locating and constructing railroads and canals in different states. He then studied law, was admitted to the bar in 1848, and was deputy attorney-general of Newcastle county till 1850. In 1849 he was appointed a commissioner to retrace Mason and Dixon's line. (See Mason, Charles.) He was elected to congress as a Democrat, serving from 1 Dec., 1851, till 3 March, 1855, and was afterward chosen U. S. senator in place of James A. Bayard, serving from 2 Feb., 1864, till 29 March, 1867. Mr. Riddle was a delegate to the Democratic national conventions of 1844, 1848, and 1856.