OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Townsend v. Burbank/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
72 U.S. 337
Townsend v. Burbank
AFFIRMING THE JUDGMENT BELOW.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Townsend v. Burke

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
334 U.S. 736
Townsend v. Burke
Argued: April 27, 1948. --- Decided: June 14, 1948
Mr. Archibald Cox, of Cambridge, Mass., for petitioner.
Mr. Franklin E. Barr, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Kingdom

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United Kingdom."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* United Kingdom, in 1982 The World Factbook
* United Kingdom, in 2004 The World Factbook

## See also

* Portal:United Kingdom
# United Mine Workers of America, District 12 v. Illinois State Bar Association

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Stewart

## Dissenting Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 217
United Mine Workers of America, District 12 v. Illinois State Bar Association
Argued: Oct. 17, 1967. --- Decided: Dec 5, 1967
Harrison Combs, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Bernard H. Bertrand, East St. Louis, Ill., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Lines Telephone Company v. Boston Safe-Deposit Trust Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
147 U.S. 431
United Lines Telephone Company v. Boston Safe-Deposit Trust Company
In equity. Bill by the Boston Safe-Deposit & Trust Company, as trustee under a mortgage, against the United Lines Telegraph Company, Edward S. Stokes, and others, to obtain possession of certain telegraph lines. Decree for complainant. 36 Fed. Rep. 288. Defendants Stokes and the United Lines Telegraph Company appeal. Affirmed.
R. G. Ingersoll, for appellants.
Wm. G. Wilson and Hamilton Wallis, for appellee.
Mr. Justice BLATCHFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Leather Workers' International Union Local Lodge Or Union N66 v. Herkert & Meisel Trunk C

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 457
UNITED LEATHER WORKERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL LODGE OR UNION NO. 66, et al. v. HERKERT & MEISEL TRUNK CO. et al.
Argued: April 24 and 25, 1924. --- Decided: June 9, 1924
Mr. John P. Leahy, of St. Louis, Mo., for appellants.
Messrs. Charles A. Houts and Mat J. Holland, both of St. Louis, Mo., for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 458-460 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Mine Workers of America, District 12 v. Illinois State Bar Association/Concurrence Stewart

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Stewart
* Dissenting Opinion Harlan
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 217
United Mine Workers of America, District 12 v. Illinois State Bar Association
Argued: Oct. 17, 1967. --- Decided: Dec 5, 1967
Mr. Justice STEWART concurs in the result upon the sole ground that the disposition of this case is controlled by Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia State Bar, 377 U.S. 1, 84 S.Ct. 1113, 12 L.Ed.2d 89.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Transcontinental Western Air v. Civil Aeronautics Board

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Jackson
United States Supreme Court
336 U.S. 601
Transcontinental Western Air v. Civil Aeronautics Board
Argued: Feb. 8, 9, 1949. --- Decided: April 18, 1949
Mr. Gerald B. Brophy, of New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Emory T. Nunneley, Jr., of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Transcontinental Western Air v. Koppal

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
345 U.S. 653
Transcontinental Western Air v. Koppal
Argued: April 8 and 9, 1953. --- Decided: June 1, 1953
Mr. Horace G. Hitchcock, New York City, for petitioner.
Messrs. Fred J. Freel and Ray D. Jones, Jr., Kansas City, Mo., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BURTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Transatlantic Sketches (Boston: James R. Osgood & Co., 1875)

BY THE SAME AUTHOR.
A PASSIONATE PILGRIM, And Other Tales.
1 vol. 12mo. Bevelled boards. $2.00.
"Among American story-writers, Henry James stands alone,—imitating no one, and, as yet, having no imitaters.
"....These stories, taken altogether, with their culture, originality, and refinement, are very elegant, very valuable to story-readers, and worth much to the student of character."—Boston Globe.
⁂ For sale by all Booksellers. Sent, post-paid, on receipt of price by the Publishers,
JAMES R. OSGOOD & CO., Boston.
TRANSATLANTIC SKETCHES.
BY
HENRY JAMES, JR,
BOSTON:
JAMES R. OSGOOD AND COMPANY,
Late Ticknor & Fields, and Fields, Osgood, & Co.
1875.
Copyright, 1875. By JAMES R. OSGOOD & CO.
University Press: Welch, Bigelow, & Co., Cambridge.
CONTENTS.
| | Page |
| Chester | 7 |
| Lichfield and Warwick | 20 |
| North Devon | 33 |
| Wells and Salisbury | 44 |
| Swiss Notes | 56 |
| From Chambéry to Milan | 71 |
| From Venice to Strasburg | 85 |
| The Parisian Stage | 98 |
| A Roman Holiday | 110 |
| Roman Rides | 136 |
| Roman Neighborhoods | 156 |
| The After-Season in Rome | 180 |
| From a Roman Note-Book | 189 |
| A Chain of Cities | 212 |
| The St. Gothard | 230 ​ |
| Siena | 254 |
| The Autumn in Florence | 269 |
| Florentine Notes | 279 |
| Tuscan Cities | 315 |
| Ravenna | 327 |
| The Splügen | 339 |
| Homburg Reformed | 354 |
| Darmstadt | 367 |
| In Holland | 380 |
| In Belgium | 391 |
# Transatlantic Sketches

* Transatlantic Sketches (Boston: James R. Osgood & Co., 1875) (transcription project)
    — First American edition; published 29 April 1875.
* Foreign Parts (Leipzig: Bernhard Tauchnitz, 1883)
    — First Continental edition; volume 2164 of the Tauchnitz "Collection of British Authors". James introduces this work as a new edition of Transatlantic Sketches for which "the name has been been changed and the sketches have been revised." It omits four essays and parts of a fifth, that were included in the first American edition.
# Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
## Old Series

* Volume I, 1907-08 (transcription project)
* Volume II, 1908-09 (transcription project)
* Volume III, 1909-10 (transcription project)
* Volume IV, 1910-11
* Volume V, 1911-12 (transcription project)
* Volume VI, 1912-13 (transcription project)
* Volume VII, 1913-14 (transcription project)
* Volume VIII, 1914-15
* Volume IX, 1915-16 (transcription project)
# United States Code/Title 17/Chapter 13/Sections 1324 and 1325

From the U.S. Copyright Office.: Added by sec. 502 of the Vessel Hull Design Protection Act (Pub. L. 105-304, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2860), with effect from October 28, 1998.
§ 1324—Power of court over registration
In any action involving the protection of a design under this chapter, the court, when appropriate, may order registration of a design under this chapter or the cancellation of such a registration. Any such order shall be certified by the court to the Administrator, who shall make an appropriate entry upon the record.
§ 1325—Liability for action on registration fraudulently obtained
Any person who brings an action for infringement knowing that registration of the design was obtained by a false or fraudulent representation materially affecting the rights under this chapter, shall be liable in the sum of $10,000, or such part of that amount as the court may determine. That amount shall be to compensate the defendant and shall be charged against the plaintiff and paid to the defendant, in addition to such costs and attorney’s fees of the defendant as may be assessed by the court.

## Amendment history

Sections 1324 and 1325 were added by sec. 502 of the Vessel Hull Design Protection Act (Pub. L. 105-304, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2860), with effect from October 28, 1998.
# United States Code/Title 17/Chapter 13/Sections 1326 to 1328

From the U.S. Copyright Office.: Added by sec. 502 of the Vessel Hull Design Protection Act (Pub. L. 105-304, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2860), with effect from October 28, 1998.
§ 1326—Penalty for false marking
(a) IN GENERAL.—Whoever, for the purpose of deceiving the public, marks upon, applies to, or uses in advertising in connection with an article made, used, distributed, or sold, a design which is not protected under this chapter, a design notice specified in section 1306, or any other words or symbols importing that the design is protected under this chapter, knowing that the design is not so protected, shall pay a civil fine of not more than $500 for each such offense.
(b) SUIT BY PRIVATE PERSONS.—Any person may sue for the penalty established by subsection (a), in which event one-half of the penalty shall be awarded to the person suing and the remainder shall be awarded to the United States.
§ 1327—Penalty for false representation
Whoever knowingly makes a false representation materially affecting the rights obtainable under this chapter for the purpose of obtaining registration of a design under this chapter shall pay a penalty of not less than $500 and not more than $1,000, and any rights or privileges that individual may have in the design under this chapter shall be forfeited.
§ 1328—Enforcement by Treasury and Postal Service
(a) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of the Treasury and the United States Postal Service shall separately or jointly issue regulations for the enforcement of the rights set forth in section 1308 with respect to importation. Such regulations may require, as a condition for the exclusion of articles from the United States, that the person seeking exclusion take any one or more of the following actions:
    (1) Obtain a court order enjoining, or an order of the International Trade Commission under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 excluding, importation of the articles.
    (2) Furnish proof that the design involved is protected under this chapter and that the importation of the articles would infringe the rights in the design under this chapter.
    (3) Post a surety bond for any injury that may result if the detention or exclusion of the articles proves to be unjustified.
(b) SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE.—Articles imported in violation of the rights set forth in section 1308 are subject to seizure and forfeiture in the same manner as property imported in violation of the customs laws. Any such forfeited articles shall be destroyed as directed by the Secretary of the Treasury or the court, as the case may be, except that the articles may be returned to the country of export whenever it is shown to the satisfaction of the Secretary of the Treasury that the importer had no reasonable grounds for believing that his or her acts constituted a violation of the law.

## Amendment history

Sections 1326 to 1328 were added by sec. 502 of the Vessel Hull Design Protection Act (Pub. L. 105-304, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2860), with effect from October 28, 1998.
# United States Code/Title 17/Chapter 3

From the U.S. Copyright Office.
* Section 301. Preemption with respect to other laws
* Section 302. Duration of copyright: works created on or after January 1, 1978
* Section 303. Duration of copyright: Works created but not published or copyrighted before January 1, 1978
* Section 304. Duration of copyright: Subsisting copyrights
* Section 305. Duration of copyright: Terminal date
# United States Code/Title 17/Chapter 13/Sections 1329 to 1332

From the U.S. Copyright Office.: Added by sec. 502 of the Vessel Hull Design Protection Act (Pub. L. 105-304, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2860), with effect from October 28, 1998.
§ 1329—Relation to design patent law
The issuance of a design patent under title 35, United States Code, for an original design for an article of manufacture shall terminate any protection of the original design under this chapter.
§ 1330—Common law and other rights unaffected
Nothing in this chapter shall annul or limit—
    (1) common law or other rights or remedies, if any, available to or held by any person with respect to a design which has not been registered under this chapter; or
    (2) any right under the trademark laws or any right protected against unfair competition.
§ 1331—Administrator; Office of the Administrator
In this chapter, the "Administrator" is the Register of Copyrights, and the "Office of the Administrator" and the "Office" refer to the Copyright Office of the Library of Congress.
§ 1332—No retroactive effect
Protection under this chapter shall not be available for any design that has been made public under section 1310(b) before the effective date of this chapter.

## Amendment history

Sections 1329 to 1332 were added by sec. 502 of the Vessel Hull Design Protection Act (Pub. L. 105-304, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2860), with effect from October 28, 1998.
# United States Code/Title 17/Chapter 2

From the U.S. Copyright Office.
* Section 201. Ownership of copyright
* Section 202. Ownership of copyright as distinct from ownership of material object
* Section 203. Termination of transfers and licenses granted by the author
* Section 204. Execution of transfers of copyright ownership
* Section 205. Recordation of transfers and other documents
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 29/Section 285

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 285. Attorney fees
The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party.

## Source

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 813.)

## Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., Sec. 70, part (R.S. 4921, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 391, Sec. 6, 29 Stat. 694, (2) Feb. 18, 1922, ch. 58, Sec. 8, 42 Stat. 392, (3) Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 726, Sec. 1, 60 Stat. 778).
This section is substantially the same as the corresponding provision in R.S. 4921; “in exceptional cases” has been added as expressing the intention of the present statute as shown by its legislative history and as interpreted by the courts.
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 29/Section 293

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 293. Nonresident patentee; service and notice
Every patentee not residing in the United States may file in the Patent and Trademark Office a written designation stating the name and address of a person residing within the United States on whom may be served process or notice of proceedings affecting the patent or rights thereunder. If the person designated cannot be found at the address given in the last designation, or if no person has been designated, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia shall have jurisdiction and summons shall be served by publication or otherwise as the court directs. The court shall have the same jurisdiction to take any action respecting the patent or rights thereunder that it would have if the patentee were personally within the jurisdiction of the court.

## Source

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 814; Pub. L. 93-596, Sec. 1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949.)

## Historical and Revision Notes

This section provides for service on non-resident patentees.

## Amendments
### 1975

Pub. L. 93-596 substituted “Patent and Trademark Office” for “Patent Office”.

#### Effective Date of 1975 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 93-596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93-596, set out as a note under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 29/Section 292

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 292. False marking
(a) Whoever, without the consent of the patentee, marks upon, or affixes to, or uses in advertising in connection with anything made, used, offered for sale, or sold by such person within the United States, or imported by the person into the United States, the name or any imitation of the name of the patentee, the patent number, or the words “patent,” “patentee,” or the like, with the intent of counterfeiting or imitating the mark of the patentee, or of deceiving the public and inducing them to believe that the thing was made, offered for sale, sold, or imported into the United States by or with the consent of the patentee; or
Whoever marks upon, or affixes to, or uses in advertising in connection with any unpatented article, the word “patent” or any word or number importing that the same is patented for the purpose of deceiving the public; or
Whoever marks upon, or affixes to, or uses in advertising in connection with any article, the words “patent applied for,” “patent pending,” or any word importing that an application for patent has been made, when no application for patent has been made, or if made, is not pending, for the purpose of deceiving the public—
Shall be fined not more than $500 for every such offense.
(b) Any person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person suing and the other to the use of the United States.

## Source

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 814; Pub. L. 103-465, title V, Sec. 533(b)(6), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4990.)

## Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., Sec. 50 (R.S. 4901).
This is a criminal provision. The first two paragraphs of the corresponding section of existing statute are consolidated, a new paragraph relating to false marking of “patent applied for” is added, and false advertising is included in all the offenses. The minimum fine which has been interpreted by the courts as a maximum, is replaced by a higher maximum. The informer action is included as additional to an ordinary criminal action.

## Amendments
### 1994

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103-465, in first par., substituted “used, offered for sale, or sold by such person within the United States, or imported by the person into the United States” for “used, or sold by him” and “made, offered for sale, sold, or imported into the United States” for “made or sold”.

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103-465 effective on date that is one year after date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States [Jan. 1, 1995], with provisions relating to earliest filed patent application, see section 534(a), (b)(3) of Pub. L. 103-465, set out as a note under section 154 of this title.
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 29/Section 289

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 289. Additional remedy for infringement of design patent
Whoever during the term of a patent for a design, without license of the owner, (1) applies the patented design, or any colorable imitation thereof, to any article of manufacture for the purpose of sale, or (2) sells or exposes for sale any article of manufacture to which such design or colorable imitation has been applied shall be liable to the owner to the extent of his total profit, but not less than $250, recoverable in any United States district court having jurisdiction of the parties.
Nothing in this section shall prevent, lessen, or impeach any other remedy which an owner of an infringed patent has under the provisions of this title, but he shall not twice recover the profit made from the infringement.

## Source

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 813.)

## Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., Secs. 74, 75 (Feb. 4, 1887, ch. 105, Secs. 1, 2, 24 Stat. 387, 388).
Language is changed.
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 29/Section 290

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 290. Notice of patent suits
The clerks of the courts of the United States, within one month after the filing of an action under this title shall give notice thereof in writing to the Director, setting forth so far as known the names and addresses of the parties, name of the inventor, and the designating number of the patent upon which the action has been brought. If any other patent is subsequently included in the action he shall give like notice thereof. Within one month after the decision is rendered or a judgment issued the clerk of the court shall give notice thereof to the Director. The Director shall, on receipt of such notices, enter the same in the file of such patent.

## Source

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 814; Pub. L. 106-113, div. B, Sec. 1000(a)(9) [title IV, Sec. 4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A-582; Pub. L. 107-273, div. C, title III, Sec. 13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906.)

## Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., Sec. 70, part (R.S. 4921, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 391, Sec. 6, 29 Stat. 694, (2) Feb. 18, 1922, ch. 58, Sec. 8, 42 Stat. 392, (3) Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 726, Sec. 1, 60 Stat. 778).
This is the last sentence of R.S. 4921, third paragraph, with minor changes in language.

## Amendments
### 2002

Pub. L. 107-273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106-113. See 1999 Amendment note below.

### 1999

Pub. L. 106-113, as amended by Pub. L. 107-273, substituted “Director” for “Commissioner” wherever appearing.

#### Effective Date of 1999 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 106-113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, Sec. 4731] of Pub. L. 106-113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 29/Section 291

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 291. Interfering patents
The owner of an interfering patent may have relief against the owner of another by civil action, and the court may adjudge the question of the validity of any of the interfering patents, in whole or in part. The provisions of the second paragraph of section 146 of this title shall apply to actions brought under this section.

## Source

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 814.)

## Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., Sec. 66 (R.S. 4918, amended Mar. 2, 1927, ch. 273, Sec. 12, 44 Stat. 1337).
Language is changed.