OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Manual of the Lodge

    Preface
    Table of Contents
    Plates
    System of Monitorial Instruction
* Entered Apprentice's Degree
* Fellow Craft's Degree
* Master Mason's Degree
    Ancient Ceremonies of the Order
* Consecration, Dedication, and Constitution of a Lodge
* Annual Installation of the Officers of a Lodge
* Installation of the Officers of a Grand Lodge
* Ceremony observed at Grand Visitations
* Festivals of the Order
* Ceremony observed at Laying the Foundation Stones of Public Structures
* Dedication of Freemasons' Halls
* Funeral Service
* Regulations for Processions
    Appendixes
* The Twenty-five Landmarks of Freemasonry
* The Old Charges
* The General Regulations
* Forms of Documents
A
Manual Of The Lodge:
OR,
Monitorial Instructions
IN THE DEGREES OF
ENTERED APPRENTICE, FELLOW CRAFT, AND MASTER MASON,
ARRANGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
AMERICAN SYSTEM OF LECTURES:
TO WHICH ARE ADDED
THE CEREMONIES OF THE ORDER OF PAST MASTER RELATING TO INSTALLATIONS, DEDICATIONS, CONSECRATIONS, LAYING OF CORNER-STONES, ETC.
Albert G. Mackey, M. D.
PAST GENERAL GRAND HIGH-PRIEST OF THE GENERAL GRAND CHAPTER OF THE UNITED STATES, AUTHOR OF A "LEXICON OF FREEMASONRY," "BOOK OF THE CHAPTER," "THE RITUALIST," "CRYPTIC MASONRY," "SYMBOLISM OF FREE- MASONRY," ETC.
A NEW EDITION, REVISED AND ENLARGED BY THE AUTHOR.
"Antiquity considered Initiation as a delivery from a living death of vice, brutality, and misery; and the beginning of a new life of virtue, reason, and happiness."—Washington
NEW YORK: Effingham Maynard & Co.,
SUCCESSORS TO Clark & Maynard, Publishers, 771 Broadway and Q7 & 69 Ninth St. 1891.
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1868,
By M A C K O Y & S I C K E L S,
In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1870,
By ALBERT G. MACKEY, M.D.,
at the Office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington.
TO
WINSLOW LEWIS, M. D.,
PAST GRAND MASTER OF MASSACHUSETTS,
THIS WORK
Is Deidcated,
NOT MORE
AS A TRIBUTE OF THE RESPECT WHICH I FEEL
FOR
HIS INTELLECTUAL ATTAINMENTS,
THAN
As a Token of that Sincere Affection long since won from me
BY THE
LARGENESS AND KINDNESS OF HIS HEART.
# Marakar v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
370 U.S. 723
Mohamed MARAKAR v. UNITED STATES.
Niamat A. Mushraf ALI
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 1234, Misc. Supreme Court of the United States
June 25, 1962
Joseph F. Walsh, for petitioner in No. 1191.
Harry T. Carter, for petitioner in No. 1234.
Solicitor General Cox, for the United States.
On Petitions for Writs of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Marakar v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
370 U.S. 723
Mohamed MARAKAR v. UNITED STATES.
The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. On motion of the Solicitor General and upon an examination of the entire record, the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments are vacated, and the causes are remanded to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey with directions to dismiss the indictments.
Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, and Mr. Justice BRENNAN join the Court's disposition because they believe that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment was an insurmountable barrier to the prosecution of these petitioners under the separate indictments returned on April 26, 1961 charging each petitioner with a substantive offense of illegally bringing opium into this country. See Abbate v. United States, 359 U.S. 187, 196, 79 S.Ct. 666, 3 L.Ed.2d 729 (separate opinion); cf. Petite v. United States 361 U.S. 529, 533, 80 S.Ct. 450, 4 L.Ed.2d 490 (dissenting opinion).
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Marande v. Texas Pacific Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
184 U.S. 173
Marande v. Texas Pacific Railway Company
Argued: January 8, 9, 1902. --- Decided: February 24, 1902
This action was commenced to recover from the Texas & Pacific Railway Company the value of 65 bales of cotton destroyed by fire on the night of the 12th of November, 1894, whilst the cotton was in the cars of the railway company standing on its tracks in the rear of or in close proximity to a terminal wharf of the corporation situated opposite the upper portion of the city of New Orleans, on the west bank of the Mississippi river, at a point called Westwego. The cotton formed part of 100 bales shipped from Greenville, Texas, on the 29th of October, 1894. An export bill of lading was given by the Sherman, Shreveport, & Southern Railway Company, that Company purporting to act, not only on its own, but also on behalf of the Texas & Pacific Railway, and of the Elder Dempster & Co. steamship lines. The bill of lading provided for the carriage of the cotton from the point of shipment 'to the port of New Orleans,' and thence by the steamship line to Havre, France, and contained numerous conditions and exceptions, one of which exempted the carrier from all loss occasioned by fire. Responsibility of the railway company for the value of the cotton destroyed by fire, although at time of its destrcution it was in the possession of the railway under the bill of lading, was based on the assumption, first, that the fire was due to the negligence of the corporation; and, second, that the carriage of the cotton to the terminal wharf at Westwego, for transhipment there to the steamship line, was a deviation, and hence the railway company was not entitled to avail itself of the exception against loss by fire.
Upon issue joined, a trial was had in the circuit court. After the plaintiffs had introduced their testimony and rested their case, the defendant requested the court to take the case from the jury by giving a peremptory instruction in its favor. This was asked on the ground that there was no proof sufficient to go to the jury, either as to the alleged negligence, or the asserted deviation. The court granted the request, and exceptions were duly saved by the plaintiffs. From the judgment entered on the verdict the plaintiffs prosecuted error to the circuit court of appeals for the second circuit, and in that court the judgment was affirmed.
The case being one depending not solely on diverse citizenship, the defendant corporation being chartered by an act of Congress, the plaintiffs prosecuted error to this court.
Messrs. Treadwell Cleveland, Frederick E. Mygatt, and George Richards for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Rush Taggart and Arthur H. Masten for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice White, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Letter from Arafat to Clinton, 27 December 2000

* related portals: Supranational organizations.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Unofficial Translation of a letter by President Yasser Arafat to President Bill Clinton about the Clinton Parameters. 27 December 2000. The source mentions send date 28 December 2000.
Mr. President, please allow me address you with all the sincerity emanating from the close friendship that ties us, and the historical importance of what you are trying to do. I want to assure you of my will to continue to work with you to reach a peace agreement. I need your help in clarifying and explaining the basis of your initiative.
I need clear answers to many questions relating to calculation of land ratios that will be annexed and swapped, and the actual location of these territories, as well as the basis for defining the Wailing Wall, its borders and extensions, and the effect of that on the concept of full Palestinian sovereignty over al-Haram al-Sharif.
We understand that the idea of leasing additional territory is an option we have the right to reject, and is not a parameter of your bridging proposals. We also presume that the emergency Israeli locations are also subject to negotiations and to our approval. I hope that you have the same understanding.
I have many questions relating to the return of refugees to their homes and villages. I have a negative experience with the return of displaced Palestinians to the West Bank and Gaza during the Interim Period. Because the modalities remained tied to an Israeli veto, not one refugee was allowed to return through the mechanism of the interim agreement, which required a quadripartite committee of Egypt, Jordan, Israel and Palestine to decide on their return. Equally, I don't see a clear approach dealing with compensation of the refugees for their land, property and funds taken by Israel under the aegis of the Israeli custodian of absentee property.
I feel, Mr. President, that the period for Israeli withdrawal specified in your initiative is too long. It will allow the enemies of peace to exploit the time to undo the agreement. I wonder if the "Period" is one of the fixed parameters of your proposal; a "basis" that cannot be changed.
Mr. President, I have many questions. I need maps, details, and clarifications that can help me take the necessary decisions with my leadership and people.
I would like you to appreciate that I do not want to procrastinate or waste time.
We need a real opportunity to invest once more your determination and creativity to reach a fair and lasting peace with you efforts and during your presidency.
I remain, Mr. President, ready to pay you a visit at the White House, in the shortest possible time if you find this visit appropriate, to discuss with you the bridging proposals and to exchange views on ways to develop them further.
Please accept my highest regards and best wishes,
Yasser Arafat
# Letter from Aubrey Hall to Margaret Hall, 1935-12-25

​CARNARVON W.A. 27 DE 35
Miss Margaret Hall
c/o T.S. Lodge Esq
130 Broome Street
Yaringa South
Christmas Day /35
My dear Margaret,
Festivities in full swing here. I came in yesterday evening, had been out for ten days.
Seventeen here for dinner, Yaringas, Woodleighs, and Hamelin Pools, also (illegible text), Val and their mother.
Hope you are having a decent time, probably hotter in Perth than in Carnarvon.
Very hot here in the back paddocks, cannot shift sheep in the afternoon (illegible text) when they keep getting under the shade.
Don't rush about too much, change and rest is what you need, not rush and excitement. Hope you will see Aunt Joy, Lou, Edith and Mrs Gillam.
Have you seen or heard of Norman Watson or seen anything of Hedly?
I do hope and pray Gag is home and making good ​recover from this last carbuncle & that the prompt medical and surgical treatment in this case will end the scurge. Mother sent me a parcel of (illegible text) and I wired her for, per Mrs Lammond & I was hoping for news of Gag, but she did not write, so I only know up to when Gag had just gone to the hospital with Mr Scott.
I shall be glad if there is no (illegible text) for a while after I finish here, have now had thirteen weeks continuous shearing (illegible text). Had two smacks in my left eye from scrub, my (illegible text) just about turn off me in the scrub & my horse came down with (illegible text) (illegible text). It is (illegible text) that (illegible text), (illegible text), (illegible text), in all 15 (illegible text) are putting up £500 each, trying. (illegible text) (illegible text) opening (illegible text) transport it will be a hard thing for your (illegible text).
With love and fond wishes and hoping for your safe return. Your affectionate
Dad—
# Letter from Anne Warren Weston to Fanny Kemble

* related portals: Letters.
* related authors: Fanny Kemble.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
​Rough copy of a letter to F. Kemble; A.W. Weston
Mrs Frances Anne Kemble
Dear Madam
I trust that an apology for addressing you may be found in the belief I am most happy to entertain that on the question now so deeply agitating the whole country, that of the continuance of American Slavery your sympathies are in agreement with those of the Abolitionists.
I would have wished that the request I am about to make might have now the advantage of presentation by some one engaging the honour of a personal acquaintance & respect more than even the advice upon the courtesy of my dear friend Mrs Fuller upon who who could have asked your help without ​any of that fear of intrusion which a stranger must necessarily feel.
You may be perhaps amused that an Annual Bazaar for the benefit of the Anti Slavery Course has been held in Boston for the last 15 years. The state of sentiment considered it has been very succeſsful, & has furnished a large proportion of the funds by which Anti Slavery publications & Literature have been maintained sustained. For the last few years it has been held in Faneuil Hall and several of the evenings (for the Bazaar continues open ten days) have been devoted to ​addreſses on Slavery from men distinguished in the cause such as Wendell Phillips, Garrison, W. H. Channing & others.
My wish is that The Bazaar for 1849–50 opens in Faneuil Hall on Monday the 24th of Dec & continues open through the next ten days. My wish My purpose in writing is to ask that you would give any evening during that period you would give on your the A.S. Cause the Bazaar the invaluable benefit of your assistance by such Readings as you may judge best suited to the occasion.
My knowledge that you were to be in New York on the 17th makes me hope that you might visit Boston without much additional inconvenience.
I send some an account of our ​last year's Bazaar that you may obtain a better view of the mode of action, in behalf of which I have ventured to addreſs you solicit your help. Mrs Green, Miſs Cabot, Mrs James Russell Lowe, Mrs F. G. Shaw, Misses Chapman are names that occur to me among our list of Managers as those with which you may be familiar.
I will occupy your time no longer. I should feel embarr more sensibly the intrusion has meant of making this application were I not so deeply sensible of the solemnity & magnitude of the work those our very humble efforts are striving to promote.
Believe me with sentiments of very high admiration and respect
yrs most.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Letter from Arthur Griffith to Lloyd George concerning Unionists

Source: Ashburton Guardian, Volume XLII, Issue 9406, 9 December 1921, Page 5
7 December 1921
I am meeting the Southern Unionists. I agree that a scheme should be devised to givem them a full share of representation in the first Chamber of the Irish Parliament, and we will also consult them regarding the constitution of the Upper Chamber and undertake that their interests will be duly represented.
I take this opportunity of saying we desire the co-operation of the Unionists, in common with all other sections of the Irish nation, in raising the structure and shaping the destiny of the Irish Free State. We look for assistance in the same spirit of understanding and goodwill which we will show towards their traditions and interests.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Many Inventions

The transcription is from the 1st English edition, published in 1893. Of the 14 stories it contains, 12 had previously appeared in a periodical. Were this is the case, information about its first publication is provided in its Notes section, based on Bibliography of the Works of Rudyard Kipling (1927), by Flora V. Livingston.
MANY INVENTIONS
page
page
MANY INVENTIONS
BY
RUDYARD KIPLING
'Lo, this only have I found, that God hath made man upright; but they have sought out many inventions.'—Ecclesiastes vii. 29.
London MACMILLAN AND CO. AND NEW YORK 1893
All rights reserved
page
CONTENTS
Layout 2
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1936, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 87 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Manufacturing Company v. Trainer

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Clifford
United States Supreme Court
101 U.S. 51
Manufacturing Company v. Trainer
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. George M. Dallas and Mr. James E. Gowen for the appellant.
Mr. Samuel Dickson, contra.
MR. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Manufacturing Company v. Ladd

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
102 U.S. 408
Manufacturing Company v. Ladd
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. John S. Abbott and Mr. Henry W. Boardman for the appellant.
Mr. Charles E. Mitchell for the appellee.
MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Manumission

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Manumission."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Manumission", a poem by Gladys Cromwell
* "Manumission", a poem by Sara Beaumont Kennedy
# Lynch v. Household Finance Corporation
## Dissenting Opinion

    White
Supreme Court of the United States
405 U.S. 538
Lynch et al. v. Household Finance Corp. et al.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
No. 70-5058. Argued: December 7, 1971 --- Decided: March 23, 1972
Appellee Household Finance Corp. sued appellant Lynch in state court alleging nonpayment of a promissory note, and, prior to serving her with process, garnished her savings account under Connecticut law authorizing summary pre-judicial garnishment. Appellant challenged the validity of the state statutes under the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, and sought declaratory and injunctive relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and its jurisdictional counterpart, 28 U.S.C. § 1343 (3). The District Court dismissed the complaint on the grounds (1) that it lacked jurisdiction under § 1343 (3), as that section applies only if "personal" rights, as opposed to "property" rights, are impaired, and (2) that relief was barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2283, proscribing injunctions against state court proceedings.
Held:
    1. There is no distinction between personal liberties and proprietary rights with respect to jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1343 (3). Pp. 542-552.
       (a) Neither the language nor the legislative history of that section distinguishes between personal and property rights. Pp. 543-546.
       (b) There is no conflict between that section and 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and the legislative history of § 1331 does not provide any basis for narrowing the scope of § 1343 (3) jurisdiction. Pp. 546-550.
       (c) It would be virtually impossible to apply a "personal liberties" limitation on § 1343 (3) as there is no real dichotomy between personal liberties and property rights. It has long been recognized that rights in property are basic civil rights. Pp. 550-552.
    2. Prejudgment garnishment under the Connecticut statutes is levied and maintained without the participation of the state courts, and thus an injunction against such action is not barred by the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2283. Pp. 552-556.
318 F. Supp. 1111, reversed and remanded.
STEWART, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which DOUGLAS, BRENNAN, and MARSHALL, JJ., joined. WHITE, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which BURGER, C. J., and BLACKMUN, J., joined, post, p. 556. POWELL and REHNQUIST, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
David M. Lesser argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was William H. Clendenen, Jr.
Richard G. Bell argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief for appellees Household Finance Corp. et al. were Charles A. Pulaski, Jr., and David W. Goldman. Robert K. Killian, Attorney General of Connecticut, and Raymond J. Cannon and Robert L. Hirtle, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, filed a brief for Barrett, Deputy Sheriff.
# Maurine And Other Poems/Lippo

Now we must part, my Lippo. Even so, I grieve to see thy sudden pained surprise; Gaze not on me with such accusing eyes— ’Twas thine own hand which dealt dear Love’s death-blow.
I loved thee fondly yesterday. Till then Thy heart was like a covered golden cup Always above my eager lip held up. I fancied thou wert not as other men.
I knew that heart was filled with Love’s sweet wine, Pressed wholly for my drinking. And my lip Grew parched with thirsting for one nectared sip Of what, denied me, seemed a draught divine.
Last evening, in the gloaming, that cup spilled Its precious contents. Even to the lees Were offered to me, saying, “Drink of these!” And, when I saw it empty, Love was killed.
No word was left unsaid, no act undone, To prove to me thou wert my abject slave. Ah! Love, hadst thou been wise enough to save One little drop of that sweet wine—but one—
I still had loved thee, longing for it then. But even the cup is mine. I look within, And find it holds not one last drop to win, And cast it down.—Thou art as other men.
# Maurine And Other Poems/Over the Banisters

Over the banisters bends a face,  Daringly sweet and beguiling. Somebody stands in careless grace  And watching the picture, smiling.
The light burns dim in the hall below,  Nobody sees her standing, Saying good-night again, soft and low,  Halfway up to the landing.
Nobody only the eyes of brown,  Tender and full of meaning, That smile on the fairest face in town,  Over the banisters leaning.
Tired and sleepy, with drooping head,  I wonder why she lingers; Now, when the good-nights all are said,  Why, somebody holds her fingers.
He holds her fingers and draws her down,  Suddenly growing bolder, Till the loose hair drops its masses brown  Like a mantle over his shoulder.
Over the banisters soft hands, fair,  Brush his cheeks like a feather, And bright brown tresses and dusky hair  Meet and mingle together.
There’s a question asked, there’s a swift caress,  She has flown like a bird from the hallway, But over the banisters drops a “Yes,”  That shall brighten the world for him alway.
# Maurine And Other Poems/Philosophy

At morn the wise man walked abroad,  Proud with the learning of great fools. He laughed and said, “There is no God—  ’Tis force creates, ’tis reason rules.”
Meek with the wisdom of great faith,  At night he knelt while angels smiled, And wept and cried with anguished breath,  “Jehovah, God, save Thou my child.”