# A History of the Australian Ballot System in the United States/Appendix B

APPENDIX B BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bacon, Steuben T. The Ballot: Dangers from Its Perversion. Beard, Charles A. American Government and Politics. Bishop, C. F. History of Elections in the American Colonies. Buxton, Sydney. Political Questions of the Day. Cleveland, F. A. Organized Democracy. Congressional Documents. Documents 427, 497, 572, 916, 218. Cyclopedia of American Government, edited by McLaughlin and Hart, article on the "Ballot." Dana, Richard H. The Australian Ballot of Massachusetts–Some Fallacious Objections Answered. Electoral Reform, with the Massachusetts Ballot Reform Act and the New York (Saxton) Bill. Economic Tracts No. XXV, issued by the Society for Political Education of New York. Flexner, Abraham. The New Ballot Law of Louisville, Kentucky, at Work. Glasson, William H. The Australian System of Voting. Gordon, J. L. The Protection of the Suffrage. Hansard Parliamentary Debates, 1868–72. Ivins, William M. Machine Politics and Money in Elections. ———. On the Electoral System of the State of New York. Kentucky Constitutional Convention, 1890. Debates. Ludington, A. C. American Ballot Laws, 1888–1910. McCrary, G. W. Treatise on the American Law of Elections. 4th ed. (1897). McKinley, A. E. The Suffrage Franchise in the Thirteen English Colonies of America. “Report from the Select Committee of the British Parliament on Parliamentary and Municipal Elections,” Parl. Papers, VIII (1868–69). Tracts on the Ballot. Issued by the Society for Promoting the Adoption of the Vote by Ballot. Wigmore, John H. The Australian Ballot System as Embodied in the Legislation of Various Countries.
NEWSPAPERS AND PERIODICALS
The Chicago Tribune, 1888–91. The Daily News (Chicago), 1889–91. The Inter Ocean (Chicago), 1889–91. The New York Herald, 1888–90. The New York Sun, 1888–89.
​The New York Times, 1888–91. The New York Tribune, 1890. Allen, P. L. “Ballot Laws and Their Workings,” Political Science Quarterly, XXI, 37. ———. “Ballot Laws and the Elections,” Nation, LXXIX, 428. ———. “An Impossible Ballot,” Nation, LXXXI, 395. ———. “The Multifarious Australian Ballot,” North American Review, CXCI, 602. ———. “The Colorado Ballot and Others,” Nation, LXXX, 84. Ames, Oliver; Saxton, Charles; Bulkeley, Morgan G.; and Mahone, William. “The New Method of Voting,” North American Review, CXLIX, 750. Bernheim, A. C. “The Ballot in New York,” Political Science Quarterly, IV, 130. Binney, C. C. “The Pennsylvania Law of 1892,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, II, 751. ———. “Australian Ballot,” Lippincott’s, XLIV, 381. ———. “Ballot Reform in the Courts,” Nation, LVI, 29. Bishop, J. B. “A Massachusetts Ballot Act,” Nation, XLVI, 230. ———. “Ballot Reform in Operation,” Nation, XLVII, 490. ———. “Ballot Reform in the Elections,” Nation, LI, 394. ———. “Ballot Laws and Election Frauds,” Nation, LVIII, 4. ———. “Successful Ballot Laws,” Nation, XLIX, 304. ———. “Election Reforms,” Nation, LX, 24. ———. “The Secret Ballot and the Election of 1892,” Nation, LIV, 442. ———. “The Law and the Ballot,” Scribner’s, III, 194. ———. “The Secret Ballot in Thirty-three States,” Forum, XII, 589. Daly, J. F. “Ballot Laws of New York,” North American Review, CLXVIII, 103. Dana, Richard Henry. “Australian Ballot System of Massachusetts,” Proceedings of the Atlantic City Conference for Good City Government (1906). ———. “Practical Working of the Australian System of Voting in Massachusetts,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, II, 733. ———. “Form of Ballot,” City Club Bulletin (Philadelphia, 1910). ———. “The Separate-Party Column,” Nation, L, 111. Deming, Clarence. “A Lesson in Ballot Reform,” Nation, LII, 25. George, Henry. “Money in Elections,” North American Review, CXXXVI, 201. Goff, John W. “Juggling with the Ballot,” North American Review, CLVIII, 203. Grubb, E. B. “A Campaign for Ballot Reform,” North American Review, CLV, 684. Hartwell, C. S. “Frauds by Marked Ballots,” Outlook, LXXV, 658. Hempstead, E. A. “Use of Political Designations upon Official Ballots in Connection with the Names of Candidates,” Proceedings of the Chicago Conference for Good City Government (1904).
​Ludington, A. C. “Ballot Laws in the Southern States,” South Atlantic Quarterly, IX, 21. ———. “Ballot Laws: Changes during 1909,” American Political Science Review, IV, 63. ———. “Present Status of Ballot Laws in the United States,” American Political Science Review, III, 252. ———. “Ballot Legislation of 1911,” American Political Science Review, VI, 54. Lusk, H. H. “American Ballot,” Forum, XXII, 225. McKinley, A. E. “Maryland Ballot Law,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, XVII, 533. Paine, R. T. “Elimination of Party Designations in Municipal Elections,” Proceedings of the Cincinnati Conference for Good City Government (1909). Rice, A. T. “Reforms in Balloting,” North American Review, CXLIII, 628. Shaw, W. B. “Good Ballot Laws and Bad,” Outlook, LXXXI, 863. Shearn, C. J. “Form of the Ballot,” City Club Bulletin (Philadelphia, 1910). Villard, O. G. “Reform of the Ballot,” Nation, LXXII, 169. Wakefield, E. “Australian Ballot,” Forum, VIII, 148. Wallace, A. M. “Advent of the Australian Ballot,” Nation, LIV, 87. Wigmore, J. H. “Constitutionality of Australian Ballot Laws,” American Law Review, XXIII, 719. Woodruff, C. R. “Ballot Reform in Pennsylvania,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, XIV, 385. ———. “Election Methods and Reforms in Philadelphia,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, XVII, 202.
THE BALLOT IN ENGLAND
Asquith, H. H., and Goodby, E. “The Ballot in England,” Political Science Quarterly, III, 654. Ridgway, J. “Thoughts on Moderate Reform in the House of Commons,” Westminster Review, XIII, 1. “The Ballot,” Westminster Review, XCIV, 437. “Bribery and Intimidation at Elections,” Westminster Review, XXV, 485. “Electoral Reform, Electoral Bribery, the Ballot,” Westminster Review, CXV, 443.
TABLE OF CASES
Attorney-General v. May (99 Mich. 538) Allen v. Glynn (17 Colo. 338) Apple v. Barcroft (158 Ill. 649) Arnold v. Anderson (93 S. W. Rep. 692) Atkenson v. Lay (115 Mo. 538) Baker v. Board of Election Com’rs of Wayne Co. (68 N. W. Rep. 752) Barnes v. Board of Sup’rs of Pike Co. (51 Miss. 305) Bartlett v. McIntire (79 Atl. Rep. 525) Bechtel v. Aldin (134 Ind. 193) Behrensmeyer v. Kreitz (135 Ill. 591) Berryman v. Megginson (229 Ill. 238) Blankenship v. Israel (132 Ill. 514) Bloedel v. Cromwell (104 Minn. 487) Bowers v. Smith (111 Mo. 45) Bradley v. Shaw (133 N. Y. 493) Brents v. Smith (250 Ill. 521) Brisbin v. Cleary (26 Minn. 107) Burke v. Foster (36 So. Rep. 32) Capen v. Foster (12 Pick. 485) Chamberlain v. Wood (15 S. Dak. 216) Chapman v. Miller (52 Ohio St. 166) Chateau v. Jacob (88 Mich. 170) Cole v. Tucker (164 Mass. 486) Comm. v. Martin (20 Pa. Co. Ct. 117) Comm. v. Richmond (5 Pa. Dist. 647) Cook v. State (90 Tenn. 407) Coulehan v. White (95 Md. 703) Curran v. Clayton (86 Maine 42) Detroit v. Rush (82 Mich. 532) De Walt v. Bartley (146 Pa. St. 529) Durgin v. Curran (77 Atl. Rep. 689) Eaton v. Brown (31 Pac. Rep. 250) Fernbacher v. Roosevelt (90 Hun [N. Y.] 441) Fields v. Osborne (60 Conn. 544) Gilleland v. Schuyler (9 Kan. 569) Gillespie v. McDonough (79 N. Y. Suppl. 182) Grubb v. Turner (259 Ill. 436) Hager v. Robinson (157 S.W. Rep. 1138) Hanscom v. State (10 Tex. Civ. App. 638)
​Hayes v. Ross (127 Pac. Rep. 340) Heyl v. Guion (155 Mo. 76) Hennessy v. Porch (247 Ill. 388) Hopper v. Britt (96 N. E. 371) Horning v. Burgess (77 N. W. 446) Houston v. Steele (34 S. W. Rep. 6) Howser v. Pepper (8 N. Dak. 484) In re Middendorf (4 Pa. Dist. R. 78) Jones v. State (55 N. E. Rep. 229) Kelly v. Adams (183 Ill. 193) Kelso v. Wright (110 Iowa 560) King v. State (30 Tex. Civ. App. 320) Kirk v. Rhoads (46 Cal. 399) Kirkpatrick v. Deegans (53 W. Va. 275) Ledbetter v. Hall (62 Mo. 422) Lovett v. Ferguson (10 S. Dak. 44) Lindstrom v. Manistee Co. (94 Mich. 467) Lorin v. Seitz (8 N. Dak. 404) McGrane v. County of Nez Perces (18 Idaho 714) McKay v. Minner (154 Mo. 608) McKittrick v. Pardee (8 S. Dak. 39) McKune v. Wheeler (11 Cal. 49) Matter of Fairchild (151 N. Y. 359) Mauck v. Brown (59 Neb. 382) Miller v. Clark (62 Pac. 664) Miller v. Davenport (70 Pac. Rep. 610) Miller v. Pennoyer (23 Ore. 364) Miller v. Schallern (8 N. Dak. 395) Miner v. Olin (159 Mass. 487) Montgomery v. O’Dell (67 Hun [N. Y.] 169) Moody v. Trimble (58 S. W. Rep. 504) Moyer v. Van De Vanter (12 Wash. 377) Murphy v. Battle (155 Ill. 182) Murphy v. Curry (137 Cal. 479) Nance v. Kearbey (158 S. W. Rep. 629) Ogg v. Glover (83 Pac. Rep. 1039) Orr v. Bailey (59 Neb. 128) Oughton v. Black (61 Atl. 346) Parker v. Orr (158 Ill. 609) Parvin v. Wimberg (130 Ind. 561) Patterson v. People (65 Ill. App. 651) Pearson v. Board of Sup’rs of Brunswick Co. (91 Va. 322) Pennington v. Hare (60 Minn. 146) People v. Avery (102 Mich. 572)
​People v. Campbell (138 Cal. 11) People v. District Ct. (18 Colo. 26) People v. Hartley (170 Ill. 370) People v. Parkhurst (53 N. Y. Suppl. 598) People v. Pease (27 N. Y. 45) People v. Richmond Co. (156 N. Y. 36) People v. Rose (71 N. E. Rep. 1123) People v. Shaw (133 N. Y. 493) People v. Wappinger Falls (30 N. Y. Suppl. 265) Perkins v. Bertrand (192 Ill. 58) Phelps v. Piper (48 Neb. 724) Price v. Lush (10 Mont. 61) Rhodes v. Driver (64 S. W. Rep. 272) Ritchie v. Richards (14 Utah 345) Roberts v. Quest (173 Ill. 427) Rogers v. Jacob (88 Ky. 502) Sanner v. Patton (155 Ill. 553) Schuler v. Hogan (168 Ill. 369) Sego v. Stoddard (136 Ind. 297) Shields v. Jacobs (88 Mich. 164) Short v. Gouger (130 S. W. 267) Slaymaker v. Phillips (5 Wyo. 453) Slenker v. Engel (250 Ill. 499) State v. Allen (43 Neb. 651) State ex rel. Runge v. Anderson (100 Wis. 523) State v. Black (54 N. J. L. 446) State v. Bode (55 Ohio St. 224) State v. Burdick (6 Wyo. 448) State v. Connor (86 Tex. 133) State v. Dillon (32 Fla. 545) State v. Fawcett (17 Wash. 188) State v. Gay (59 Minn. 6) State v. Howser (100 N. W. Rep. 964) State v. Lesueur (103 Mo. 253) State v. McMillan (108 Mo. 153) State v. Norris (37 Neb. 299) State v. Ramsey Co. Dist. Ct. (74 Minn. 177) State v. Sadler (25 Nev. 131) State v. Walsh (62 Conn. 260) State v. Winnett (100 N. W. Rep. 1113) Sweeney v. Hjul (23 Nev. 409) Tandy v. Lavery (194 Ill. 372) Taylor v. Bleakley (55 Kan. 1) Temple v. Mead (4 Vt. 535)
​Todd v. Election Com’rs (104 Mich. 474) Truelsen v. Hugo (91 N. W. 434) Vallier v. Brakke (7 S. Dak. 343) Vorhees v. Arnold (108 Iowa 77) Wells v. Munroe (86 Md. 443) West v. Ross (53 Mo. 350) Wheelocks Case (82 Pa. St. 297) Whittem v. Zahorik (91 Iowa 23) Williams v. Stein (38 Ind. 89) Young v. Simpson (21 Colo. 460)
For references to cases on elections, see the American Digest, Century ed., Vol. XVIII; American Digest, Decennial ed., Vol. VII; American Digest Key, numbered series, Vols. I–XVIII; American and English Encyclopedia of Law, 2d ed., Vol. X; Cyclopedia of Law and Procedure, Vol. XV.
The most important sources for the material included in this study are the Revised Statutes, Digests, Codes, and Session Laws of the several states. For the period from about 1800 to 1880, the Digests and Codes were generally used. From 1880 to January 1915, the author referred to the Session Laws.