# God's glory in the heavens/The Structure Of Comets

Head of Donati's Comet.
X. THE STRUCTURE OF COMETS.
The comet of Donati, which presented so imposing a spectacle in our northern hemisphere in 1858, strongly revived the popular interest in such phenomena. Few of the present generation had an opportunity of gazing on any comet of remarkable splendour and magnitude. Our fathers told us of the wonderful comet of 1811, spanning half the circuit of the heavens with its tail, and hanging over ​the earth for weeks together like a drawn sword; we listened, however, as to a legend of the olden time, and despaired of seeing such sights in our day. The comet of 1858 burst upon our view, and proclaimed that there were still wonders in nature, surpassing any that the eye of man had yet seen. Notwithstanding the tendency of the old to exaggerate the wonders of their youth, the privileged few who remembered the comet of 1811, confessed that Donati's comet was altogether a finer object, though it did not stretch so far across the heavens.
Though comets served no other object than to awaken fresh interest in celestial phenomena, their visits to our regions of space would not be in vain. Such startling phenomena serve to dispel the indifference with which we are prone to gaze upon the unvarying page of the "Book of God," presented to us by the ordinary aspect of the heavens. It was a bright star in the sixteenth century, suddenly bursting forth, and as suddenly dying out, that gave to the world the great astronomer Tycho Bralie. This imposing object determined his tastes and fixed his future career. Mr Bond, the distinguished American astronomer, who has just been gathered to his fathers, dates his astronomical career from the total eclipse of 1806. This sublime and awe-inspiring spectacle took possession of his mind to such a degree, that he gazed with ceaseless and inquiring wonder on the face of the heavens; this eager prying into the depths of ​space gave him, while yet a boy, almost supernatural power of vision with the naked eye. As a watchmaker's apprentice, he could not command the aid of instruments, but, with the faith of genius, he believed that he would not be denied a sight of nature's secrets, if he made good use of the advantages within his reach. He employed various arts to increase the sensitiveness of his retina, such as looking into dark wells, so that his eye acquired such keenness of vision, that he was the first on the American continent to discover the great comet of 1811. Little did the young apprentice think that he was, in this way, most effectually qualifying himself for the management, as head of an observatory, of some of the finest instruments in the world. His finely trained eye enabled him, in after-life, to make the independent discovery of the dark ring of Saturn, and of a new satellite belonging to the same system. His early mechanical training enabled him to devise and perfect one of the greatest improvements in observation in modern times—viz., the substitution, by means of electricity, of touch, instead of hearing, to mark the instant of any astronomical event. To him, also, arc we chiefly indebted for the art of celestial photography, which promises to revolutionise the system of astronomical observations. May we not hope that Donati's comet, in like manner, has aroused the dormant powers of many a young astronomer who ​may live to extort from nature her deepest and most wonderful secrets?
One great charm of the comet, both in a popular and scientific view, is the illustration it affords of formative processes visibly going on in the grandest scale. What would not the geologist give to see illustrated, in a conveniently brief space, the molten globe, and the subsequent induration; and the various upheavals and submergences, which his theories require? But the comet reveals corresponding organic changes in the course of a few days or weeks, and on a scale vastly greater than what our earth could exhibit. What is it that renders the sight of the moon's surface so disappointing? Is it not that all is motionless? There are no moving clouds, no fluctuating seas, no fleeting snow-covering, no active volcanoes; all is motionless and deathlike. Why does the surface of the sun attract such deep interest at this moment? Because we discover agencies working with intense activity. There are elements of change detected, and these are watched with the most anxious interest. In the moon we see a frozen torrent; in the sun we see the stream dashing on with impetuous speed.
Measured by this source of interest, the comet arrests our attention much more powerfully than even the sun, the changes being much more rapid and comprehensive. We see the whole orb transformed ​before our eyes. We are apt to think that the full-sized comet is merely the same as the cloudy speck which we descried some weeks before, and that the whole difference of aspect is due to difference of distance; just as the white speck on the distant horizon differs from the frigate entering the harbour with all her sails set. This, however, is far from being the case: no doubt, increasing proximity magnifies the object; but apart from this, there is a wonderfully rapid expansion and change of form. The comet at a distance is the flower in bud; in the proximity of the sun, it is the flower in full blossom. In the latter position, there is an astonishing development in size and shape. Perhaps a more apt comparison would be to the sea anemone, in which we have, with the same substance, an alteration of bulk and form. The comet in its remote position is the shrunken anemone; with its bright nucleus and flaming tail, it is the anemone with its tentacles expanded, and its brilliant colours displayed.
Plate IV
TYPICAL STRUCTURE OF COMETS
​the potter fashioning an artistic vase from a mass of clay, so do we witness with a higher interest the comet, with all its symmetry and beauty, emerging from a mass of cloud, fashioned by great laws which are only the hands of the Divine Artist, by which it is moulded into the requisite form.
The plate illustrating the structure of the comet's head, is intended to have only a typical significance. In drawing it we have been indebted to the views, by Mr Cooper, of Donati's comet, as seen by him through his great refractor at Markree Observatory. We have combined with these the observations of M. Chacornac, of the Observatory at Paris, in order to illustrate the stratified appearance presented by the successive envelopes.
The particles of which the comet is composed are never motionless; they are in a ceaseless flow, impelled by forces which communicate to them an inconceivable rapidity of motion. The deepest mystery hangs over the nature of these forces, but the phenomena, as witnessed with the aid of the telescope, are easily described. When a comet is first descried in the heavens, it appears as a faint star, with a haze around it. It is often impossible to tell by its mere physical aspect whether it is really a comet. To solve the doubt, the observer must wait a little and see whether it is in motion. This assures him that it is not a mere nebula, and he concludes that it must be a comet. He traces, for a short way, the curve ​described, and having got a sample, he readily deduces the shape, dimensions, and position of the whole orbit. He proceeds just as one would do in cutting out figures in the sward of a garden. When a portion of a regular figure is given, it is easy to cut out the whole figure. In this way the astronomer can readily tell how near it will approach the sun, and at w^hat time. As the comet approaches the sun, internal changes can be detected. The globular mass is drawn out, the nucleus or brightest point being at the end nearest the sun. The other end soon assumes the appearance of a tail.
The forms of most large comets conform to one general type. The tail is slightly convex on one side, and has very much the appearance of a scimitar, the nucleus representing the hand with which it is grasped. The Chinese call comets "broom-stars;" and the appearance of many is very much that of a broom, bent and worn with much use. The outline of the convex, is generally better defined than that of the concave side. A comparatively dark band runs lengthways through the middle of the comet, so that it has often the appearance of two tails; the two bright streaks on each side of the tail being taken for two distinct tails.
This is the appearance to the naked eye. When the nucleus is watched with the telescope, very remarkable changes are witnessed. The luminous matter of the comet rushes forth from the nucleus, ​as the stream of fiery particles issues from a rocket. They rush out towards the sun with great velocity, but soon they reach a certain point, when they are driven back to form the tail. The appearance is not unlike that of a lighted torch held against the wind. The tendency of the flame to rise is counteracted by the action of the wind, which drives it back. The most perfect illustration we have seen of the internal form and movement of the comet, was the playing of the fountain in the garden of the Tuileries, close to the Place de la Concorde. The water rose to a considerable height, and fell back in an umbrella form. There was a slight wind, and the jet was slightly curved along its length, as in the case of the comet. The windward side was also best defined, the loose spray being all thrown to the leeward side. The descending canopy being hollow, the outline of both sides was more condensed than the central part, the eye having to look through a greater mass of water. The luminous particles shoot forth from the nucleus, just as the water spouts forth from the jet, and are thrown back to form a hollow envelope. The curvature of the comet, and the sharper definition of the convex side, are usually explained on the supposition that the comet is moving through a resisting medium, so that an effect similar to the influence of the wind on a jet-d' eau is produced.
In the case of Donati's comet, the telescope detected the formation of numerous envelopes, so that ​the head presented the appearance of distinct stratification. The forces brought into action, seemed to be intermittent, and this intermission is marked by the boundaries of the strata. There is no continuous flow in nature, and the play of a fountain gives a very good illustration of this. However steady the pressure of the water may be, the fountain plays by jerks, and not by a steady continuous stream; and the development of the comet illustrates this on a grand scale, the different envelopes being the result. What is the structure that results from this view of the comet's formation? It may be represented by a series of hollow cones packed the one within the other. The grocer's paper cones may serve as a familiar illustration, or a nest of flower-pots, the smallest being in the centre, and the others forming concentric envelopes of increasing size. This will give a striated appearance to the tail, and when there is a space between the envelopes, the successive intervals will appear comparatively dark, so that the comet may seem to have many tails. Almost all the perplexing shapes comets assume, may be explained on this assumption of hollow concentric cones.
There were three distinct stages in the development of Donati's comet. The first was that, immediately previous to its perihelion passage, on the 30th of September; the second at its nearest approach to the earth; and the third, at its nearest approach to Venus. It was ten days before the perihelion ​passage, when the first streams of light were seen to shoot out from the nucleus towards the sun. The two streams diverged from one another, like hair parted on the forehead. Six days afterwards the appearance of a fan-like bright sector was presented. This was surrounded by a darkish arc, and next by a brighter semicircle of nebulous light. At the perihelion, the fan still continued—its axis making with the axis of the tail an angle of 25°. The dark division of the latter was very black towards the nucleus. Immediately after the perihelion, the second stage commenced, and a totally new class of phenomena was presented in the shape of luminous envelopes. Three envelopes were discovered, with the nucleus in the centre. These did not quite encircle the nucleus—a sector, of about 90° in the direction of the tail, being cut out of each of them. The comet was now approaching the earth, and, three days before the minimum distance, great distortions were observed in the form of the outer envelope. It appeared like the ragged ends of heavy rain-clouds during a violent shower. Two days before the nearest approach, a new fan was formed, and the streams from the nucleus shewed a tendency to return into the tail—thus restoring to the comet the form it had before the developing process began. According to Father Secchi's theory, these disturbances were caused by the action of the earth. At the nearest approach on the 11th of October, the comet was half the ​distance between the earth and the sun. The last stage of development was when the comet approached Venus. The nearest approach to this planet was on the 17th October, when the distance was only one-ninth the distance between the earth and the sun. Two days before this, a new set of phenomena presented themselves, in the form of comma-like curved appendages to the nucleus, as if formed of bright burning matter, which had been projected from the nucleus, and then twisted back again.
The next inquiry is, How is this extraordinary development produced? What are the forces brought into play? The jet of luminous matter from the centre, is naturally explained by the action of the sun's heat, for the action is energetic in proportion to the nearness of the comet to the sun. The grand difficulty is the throwing back of the matter into the tail. Father Secchi thinks that it can be explained by the unequal action of gravitation on different parts of the comet, and holds that the distortions produced on the approach to the earth and Venus corroborate this view. It is evident that there is some repelling power, and a power capable of communicating an inconceivable velocity to the repelled particles. The usual method is to ascribe it to electric or magnetic action. It is ascertained that the sun and the moon, as well as the earth, are magnets; and the great probability is, that all the heavenly bodies are magnetic. This seems to afford a plausible ​explanation of the apparently polar forces at play in the evolution of the comet. Bessel's theory is, that at a great distance all the particles have a polarity opposite to that of the sun, but that on a near approach the comet itself, as a distinc unit, is polarised, so as to emit streams of luminous matter. The repelling of the luminous matter is not satisfactorily accounted for. Another theory has recently been started, which has, for the tim'e, put all others in abeyance, and is in process of being tested by the French savans. We allude to the hypothesis of M. Faye, which is, that there is a repelling force radiated from the sun, as well as the attractive force of gravitation, and that this is only a single case of a universal law of matter. He maintains that every incandescent body exercises this repulsion, but that it is so feeble, that it can be detected only in the case of matter of such extreme tenuity as that of comets. He supposes that the force emanates only from the surface of the sun, and not, like gravitation, from its mass. With this simple assumption, he endeavours to explain the formation and all the phenomena of comets. The envelopes are produced by the expansive power of the sun's heat, balanced by this special repelling power. The shortening of the period of the comet of Encke, is also explained by the same means. He has agreed to submit the law to the test of experiment. It was objected, that if the incandescent surface of the sun repelled the rarefied matter of comets, the ​same thing should happen in the case of incandescent bodies on the surface of the earth. He at once accepted the inference, and agreed to subject his theory to this test, if matter rare enough could be found and made visible. The extremely rarefied air left in the vacuum of an air-pump, was taken as the test; and a heated plate was employed to repel this matter. The difficulty was to make the repulsion visible. This was effected by passing an electric discharge through the exhausted receiver. The air was made palpable by means of the stratified light produced by a powerful coil. Several distinguished physicists hold the point demonstrated, though, as yet, most withhold their assent.
If this new law be established, it will be the most important advance since the time of Newton. It will, indeed, dethrone gravitation from the sole sway which it has hitherto exercised. Newton's law has been repeatedly put to the test, and more than once, astronomers trembled lest the whole Newtonian structure should totter and fall; but gravitation, with its simple ratio, has come forth triumphant from the severest ordeals. One trial more awaits it, and all the astronomers of European fame are ranged on one side or other of the question. The two principal parties are M. Hansen of Altona, and M. Delauny, and with one or other of these the various combatants side. The controversy raged for some time in the Academy of ​Sciences between Leverrier and Delauny, but, gradually, all the great astronomers of the day have been caught in the vortex. Adams is almost the only astronomer of note that stands by Delauny; Pontecoulant and Plana are leagued with Leverrier in support of the results of Hansen. Delauny has elaborated a theory, by which he shews that the moon's actual motion does not accord with the law of gravitation. Hansen, on the other hand, asserts that his theory is correct, as his tables, adopted by the British Government, accord completely with observation. The precise point is, what is termed, the acceleration of the moon's mean motion, one result of which is, that the moon, in the course of the year, nears the earth by about an inch. Yet on this inch depends the issue of the controversy. Adams and his French associate, hold that these results point clearly to some other cause than the law of gravitation, and M. Faye indicates his new law of repulsion as the true cause to explain the residual phenomenon. Though the controversy has not assumed a national aspect, the temper displayed on both sides ill befits the dignity of science. The comet in the hand of Newton broke through and shivered the crystal spheres of antiquity, and annihilated the vortices of Descartes. Strange if it be destined also to shake the foundations of even his own system. But, after all, Newton himself did not regard the law of ​gravitation as final and exclusive. He conceived it as merging in some higher law, or being modified by other forces.
When Newton failed to shew how his law could prevent the perturbations of the planets introducing confusion into the system, he suggested that the direct interference of the Almighty might be employed, occasionally, to rectify matters. He and the theologians of his day seemed to think, that there must be a defect in the celestial machine, unless it was proved to be capable of lasting for ever, and great was the rejoicing when the stability of the system was established. But suppose that there is a resisting medium, accounting for the destructive course of Encke's comet towards the sun, or that the law of gravitation requires to be modified by some new law, which may compromise the present order of things by introducing an element of decay, are we to conclude that there is a defect of wisdom in the constitution of the celestial machine? We might as reasonably deny the traces of wisdom in the structure of our bodies, because they have not the stamp of eternity. Theologians have been too much led away with the idea of the solar system being a rigid machine, with unvarying adjustments, instead of a single phase of the mighty evolutions of the material universe. There is nothing fixed and rigid in the material world except the laws by which the all-wise Ruler governs it. Every star in the heavens, and every molecule on the ​earth, is in incessant movement. There is a constant flow, and the wisdom of the Creator is seen, rather in the exquisite rhythm of movement, than in the rigid collocation of the material world. We see only a few spokes of the great wheel of the universe; and what appears to be a destructive breach of continuity, may be only the completed part of a mighty cycle.
As to the purpose served by comets, the odd fancy of Newton, that they are intended to serve as fuel to the sun, is again revived, and revived by our ablest philosophers. It is held, in connexion with the dynamical theory of heat, that the sun's heat and light must be exhausted, unless supplied with fuel, and comets are held as part of the fuel destined to keep the central fire burning. It is supposed that there are zones of meteoric matter round the sun, of which the zodiacal light may be one, which supply the sun with the needful fuel. And some careful observers state, that they have actually seen large bodies plunge into the luminous atmosphere, just as a large block of coal is thrown into the furnace by the stoker. These bodies are not supposed to act precisely as fuel, though they keep up the heat. In the practice of the Armstrong guns, it was found when a bolt was lodged in the sides of the gunboat serving as target, that it could not be touched with the hand on account of the great heat—the arrested motion being converted into heat. So the meteorites and comets are supposed to ​ the requisite heat, bv having their prodigious velocity arrested and converted into this other form of force. This is, however, a point of so much interest, and sheds so much light on the wise balancing of forces throughout the material world, that we reserve it for special discussion.
Some advocates for the doctrine of a plurality of worlds do not hesitate to maintain, that the purpose of comets is to be inhabited. They start on the principle, that it is not necessary to prove any probable conditions of life, in order to hold that any body of the system is inhabited; and, consequently, they can assign no limits to their theory. They do not scruple to hold, although the heat is so great as to burn up diamonds like tinder, and although the substance of the comet is rarer than the most perfect vacuum of the air-pump, that there may be living beings on every particle of its matter. The argument employed to support this view, is, that it is quite possible for God to make beings capable of existing in such conditions. But, is it right to make our notions of possibility the basis of a theory of God's providence? The question is one of probability not of poossibility. And if we are to proceed reverentially, we must argue from the known to the unknown, from our experience on this globe to what is probably the Divine procedure in worlds the physical conditions of which are only partially revealed to us.