OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Code/Title 10/Subtitle D/Part II

From the U.S. House of Representatives
Title 10—Armed Forces Subtitle D—Air Force and Space Force Part II—Personnel
* Chapter 911—Strength
* Chapter 913—Enlistments
* Chapter 915—Appointments in the Regular Air Force and the Regular Space Force
* Chapter 919—Temporary Appointments
* Chapter 921—Active Duty
* Chapter 923—Special Appointments, Assignments, Details, and Duties
* Chapter 925—Rank and Command
* Chapter 929—Miscellaneous Prohibitions and Penalties
* Chapter 933—Miscellaneous Rights and Benefits
* Chapter 935—Hospitalization
* Chapter 937—Decorations and Awards
* Chapter 939—Separation for Various Reasons
* Chapter 941—Retirement for Length of Service
* Chapter 943—Retired Grade
* Chapter 945—Computation of Retired Pay
* Chapter 947—Civilian Employees
* Chapter 949—Miscellaneous Investigation Requirements and Other Duties
# United States Code/Title 10/Subtitle D/Part III

From the U.S. House of Representatives
Title 10—Armed Forces Subtitle D—Air Force and Space Force Part III—Training
* Chapter 951—Training Generally
* Chapter 953—United States Air Force Academy
* Chapter 957—Schools and Camps
* Chapter 959—Civil Air Patrol
# United States v. State Investment Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
264 U.S. 206
United States v. State Investment Company
Argued: Jan. 25, 1924. --- Decided: Feb 18, 1924
The Attorney General and Mr. S. W. Williams, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from page 207 intentionally omitted]
Mr. A. T. Rogers, Jr., of Las Vegas, N. M., for appellees.
Mr. Justice SANFORD delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Stapf

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
375 U.S. 118
United States v. Stapf
Argued: Oct. 23 and 24, 1963. --- Decided: Dec 2, 1963
See 375 U.S. 981, 84 S.Ct. 477.
Wayne G. Barrett, for petitioner.
Mr. W. M. Sutton, Amarillo, Tex., for respondents.
Mr. Justice GOLDBERG delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/28th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 73

Chap. LXXIII.—An Act making appropriations for certain improvements in the Territory of Iowa.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Appropriations. That the following sums of money be, and they are hereby appropriated, out of nay money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to be expended under the direction of the Secretary of War, for the improvement and constructionImprovement of roads from― of the following roads in the Territory of Iowa, to wit:
Mississippi bluffs to Iowa city.From the Mississippi bluffs, opposite to the town of Bloomignton, to Iowa city, five thousand dollars;
Mississippi bluffs to Fox agency. Proviso.From the Mississippi bluffs, opposite the town of Burlington, to the old Sac and Fox agency, (Agency road, so called,) five thousand dollars: Provided, That such changes in the location of said road, and in the positions of the bridges thereon, may be adopted as shall be approved by the War Department;
Dubuque to Missouri.From Dubuque, to the northern boundary of Missouri (the Military road, so called,) eight thousand dollars;
Harbor at Dubuque.For the improvement of the harbor at the town of Dubuque, in addition to the appropriation of last year, seven thousand dollars.
Approved, March 3, 1845.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/28th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 68

Chap. LXVIII.—An Act for the construction and improvement of certain roads in the Territory of Wisconsin.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Appropriations for roads from That the following sums be, and the same are hereby appropriated, out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the construction and improvement of the following roads in the Territory of Wisconsin, to be expended under the direction of the Secretary of War, to wit:
Sheboygan to Fox River.For the construction and improvement of the road from Sheboygan, by way of Taychudah and Fond du Lac, to the Fox river, in the vicinity of “Green lake,” three thousand dollars;
Fort Howard to Fond du Lac.For repairing the United States’ military road between Fort Howard and Fond du Lac, the sum of two thousand dollars;
Southport to Beloit.For the improvement of the road from Southport, by way of Geneva, to the town of Beloit, five thousand dollars.
Approved, March 3, 1845.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/28th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 66

Chap. LXVI.—An Act regulating commercial intercourse with the Islands of Miquelon and St. Pierre.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Duties. That all French vessels coming directly from the islands of Miquelon and St. Pierre, either in balast or laden with articles the growth or manufacture of either of said islands, and which are permitted to be exported therefrom in American vessels, may be admitted into the ports of the United States on payment of no higher duties on tonnage, or on their cargoes as aforesaid, than are imposed on American vessels, and on like cargoes, imported in American vessels:Proviso. Provided, That this act shall not take effect until the President of the United States shall have received satisfactory information that similar privileges have been allowed to American vessels and their cargoes at said islands by the Government of France, and shall have made proclamation accordingly, and whenever said privileges shall have been revoked or annulled, the President is hereby authorized, by proclamation, to suspend the operation of this act.
Approved, March 3, 1845.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/28th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 67

Chap. LXVII.—An Act to continue the harbor improvement already commenced at the town of Southport, in the town of Southport, in the Territory of Wisconsin.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Appropriation. That the sum of fifteen thousand dollars be, and the same is hereby appropriated, out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the purpose of aiding in the completion of the harbor already commenced at the town of Southport, in the Territory of Wisconsin; and that the same be expended under the direction of the War Department.
Approved, March 3, 1845.
# United States v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company (266 U.S. 191)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
266 U.S. 191
United States v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company (266 U.S. 191)
Argued: Oct. 13 and 14, 1924. --- Decided: Nov 17, 1924
Messrs. Blackburn Esterline, of Chicago, Ill., and P. J. Farrell, of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
Mr. P. J. Farrell, of Washington, D. C., for Interstate Commerce Commission.
Messrs. Henry Wolf Bikle, of Philadelphia, Pa., and F. D. McKenney, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 192-194 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company (323 U.S. 612)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
323 U.S. 612
United States v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company Pennsylvania Railroad Company
Argued: Jan. 8, 9, 1945. --- Decided: Jan 29, 1945
Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.
Mr. John Vance Hewitt, of New York City, for Pennsylvania R. Co. et al.
Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton, of Washington, D.C., for the United States and Interstate Commerce Commission.
Mr. Parker McCollester, of New York City, for Forrest S. Smith, Trustee, etc., et al.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Percheman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
32 U.S. 51
United States v. Percheman

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Peralta

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
60 U.S. 343
United States v. Peralta
THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the southern district of California.
The nature of the claim, and a list of the documents in support of it, are given in the opinion of the court.
The decree of the District Court was as follows, viz:
That the claim presented in the petition filed in this case, for the place called San Antonio, is valid to the whole extent of its bounds, to wit: having for its northern boundary a line commencing on the bay of San Francisco, at a point where there are close to the said bay the two cerritos, as described in the first possession given by Martinez to Louis Peralta, on the 16th of August, 1820, running from the said bay eastwardly along by the southern base of the cerritos of San Antonio up a ravine, at the head of which there is a large rock or monument looking to the north, described in evidence as the Sugarloaf Rock; thence by the southern base of said rock to the comb or crest of the coast range of mountains, or the Sierra; thence for the western boundary a line running along the comb of the said Sierra, until it reaches the eastern extremity of a line, beginning on the said bay of San Francisco at the mouth of the deep creek of San Leandro, and running eastwardly up the said creek to its head or source in the Sierra, and to the comb or crest thereof, which last line is the southern boundary of the land of San Antonio; and by the said bay of San Francisco, from the mouth of the said deep creek of San Leandro up to the beginning of the said line, which has been described as the northern boundary of said tract, which line along the bay constitutes its western boundary.
And it is hereby further adjudged, ordered, and decreed, that there be confirmed to the said Domingo and Vicente Peralta, the northern portion of said land of San Antonio, bounded as follows: On the north by the northern boundary of said tract of San Antonio as above described, on the east by the comb of the said Sierra, on the west by the bay of San Francisco, and on the south by a ravine a short distance south of the buildings in the town of Oakland, on the north of which ravine there is a small house in sight of the public road, being the line of division between this land and the land of Antonio Peralta, which line extends from the said bay to the most eastern boundary of the rancho of San Antonio.
The United States appealed from this decree.
It was argued by Mr. Gillet for the United States, and by Mr. Rose and Mr. Bibb for the appellees.
Mr. Justice GRIER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Code/Title 2/Chapter 9/Subchapter 1

From the Cornell Law School U.S. Code Collection

### § 271. Establishment

There shall be in the Senate an office to be known as the Office of the Legislative Counsel, and to be under the direction of the Legislative Counsel of the Senate.

### § 272. Legislative Counsel

The Legislative Counsel shall be appointed by the President pro tempore of the Senate, without reference to political affiliations and solely on the ground of fitness to perform the duties of the office.

### § 273. Compensation

The Legislative Counsel of the Senate shall be paid at an annual rate of compensation of $40,000.

### § 274. Staff; office equipment and supplies

The Legislative Counsel shall, subject to the approval of the President pro tempore of the Senate, employ and fix the compensation of such Assistant Counsel, clerks, and other employees, and purchase such furniture, office equipment, books, stationery, and other supplies, as may be necessary for the proper performance of the duties of the Office and as may be appropriated for by Congress.

### § 275. Functions

The Office of the Legislative Counsel shall aid in drafting public bills and resolutions or amendments thereto on the request of any committee of the Senate but the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate may determine the preference, if any, to be given to such requests of the committees. The Legislative Counsel shall, from time to time, prescribe rules and regulations for the conduct of the work of the Office for the committees, subject to the approval of such Committee on Rules and Administration.

### § 276. Disbursement of appropriations

All appropriations for the Office of the Legislative Counsel shall be disbursed by the Secretary of the Senate.

### § 276a. Expenditures

With the approval of the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, the Legislative Counsel of the Senate may make such expenditures as may be necessary or appropriate for the functioning of the Office of the Legislative Counsel of the Senate.

### § 276b. Travel and related expenses

Funds expended by the Legislative Counsel of the Senate for travel and related expenses shall be subject to the same regulations and limitations (insofar as they are applicable) as those which the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration prescribes for application to travel and related expenses for which payment is authorized to be made from the contingent fund of the Senate.
# United States Code/Title 2/Chapter 9/Subchapter 2

From the Cornell Law School U.S. Code Collection
* Part I —Purpose, Policy, and Function
* Part II—Administration
# United States Code/Title 2/Chapter 9B

From the Cornell Law School U.S. Code Collection

### §§ 286 to 286g. Repealed.

The federal government accountability of the supreme court tampering of the consumer model of seal.
# United States Code/Title 20/Chapter 33

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is a United States federal law that governs how states and public agencies provide early intervention, special education, and related services to children with disabilities. It addresses the educational needs of children with disabilities from birth to age 21 in cases that involve 13 specified categories of disability. Warning: template has been deprecated.
# United States Code/Title 2/Chapter 9/Subchapter 2/Part I

From the Cornell Law School U.S. Code Collection

### § 281. Establishment

There is established in the House of Representatives an office to be known as the Office of the Legislative Counsel, referred to hereinafter in this subchapter as the “Office”.

### § 281a. Purpose and policy

The purpose of the Office shall be to advise and assist the House of Representatives, and its committees and Members, in the achievement of a clear, faithful, and coherent expression of legislative policies. The Office shall maintain impartiality as to issues of legislative policy to be determined by the House of Representatives, and shall not advocate the adoption or rejection of any legislation except when duly requested by the Speaker or a committee to comment on a proposal directly affecting the functions of the Office. The Office shall maintain the attorney-client relationship with respect to all communications between it and any Member or committee of the House.

### § 281b. Functions

The functions of the Office shall be as follows:
    (1) Upon request of the managers on the part of the House at any conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses, to advise and assist the managers on the part of the House in the course of the conference, and to assist the committee of conference in the preparation of the conference report and any accompanying explanatory statement.
    (2) Upon request of any committee of the House, or any joint committee having authority to report legislation to the House, to advise and assist the committee in the consideration of any legislation before it, and to assist the committee in the preparation of drafts of any such legislation, amendments thereto, and reports thereon.
    (3) Upon request of any Member having control of time during the consideration of any legislation by the House, to have in attendance on the floor of the House not more than two members of the staff of the Office (and, in his discretion, the Legislative Counsel) to advise and assist such Member and, to the extent feasible, any other Member, in the course of such consideration.
    (4) Upon request of any Member, subject to such reasonable restrictions as the Legislative Counsel may impose with the approval of the Speaker on the proportion of the resources of the Office which may be devoted to the requests of any one Member, to prepare drafts of legislation and to furnish drafting advice with respect to drafts of legislation prepared by others.
    (5) At the direction of the Speaker, to perform on behalf of the House of Representatives any legal services which are within the capabilities of the Office and the performance of which would not be inconsistent with the provisions of section 281a of this title or the preceding provisions of this section.
# United States Code/Title 2/Chapter 9/Subchapter 2/Part II

From the Cornell Law School U.S. Code Collection

### § 282. Legislative Counsel

The management, supervision, and administration of the Office are vested in the Legislative Counsel, who shall be appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives without regard to political affiliation and solely on the basis of fitness to perform the duties of the position. Any person so appointed shall serve at the pleasure of the Speaker.

### § 282a. Staff; Deputy Legislative Counsel; delegation of functions

(a) With the approval of the Speaker, or in accordance with policies and procedures approved by the Speaker, the Legislative Counsel shall appoint such attorneys and other employees as may be necessary for the prompt and efficient performance of the functions of the Office. Any such appointment shall be made without regard to political affiliation and solely on the basis of fitness to perform the duties of the position. Any person so appointed may be removed by the Legislative Counsel with the approval of the Speaker, or in accordance with policies and procedures approved by the Speaker.
(b)
    (1) One of the attorneys appointed under subsection (a) of this section shall be designated by the Legislative Counsel as Deputy Legislative Counsel. During the absence or disability of the Legislative Counsel, or when the office is vacant, the Deputy Legislative Counsel shall perform the functions of the Legislative Counsel.
    (2) The Legislative Counsel may delegate to the Deputy Legislative Counsel and to other employees appointed under subsection (a) of this section such of his functions as he considers necessary or appropriate.

### § 282b. Compensation

(a) The Legislative Counsel shall be paid at a per annum gross rate equal to the rate of basic pay, as in effect from time to time, for level III of the Executive Schedule of section 5314 of title 5.
(b) Members of the staff of the Office other than the Legislative Counsel shall be paid at per annum gross rates fixed by the Legislative Counsel with the approval of the Speaker or in accordance with policies approved by the Speaker, but not in excess of the rate of basic pay for one pay level above the maximum pay level for employees of the House of Representatives provided under clause 6(c) of Rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representatives.

### § 282c. Expenditures

In accordance with policies and procedures approved by the Speaker, the Legislative Counsel may make such expenditures as may be necessary or appropriate for the functioning of the Office.

### § 282d. Official mail matter

The Legislative Counsel may send the official mail matter of the Office as franked mail under section 3210 of title 39.

### § 282e. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1971, and for each fiscal year thereafter, such sums as may be necessary to carry out this subchapter and to increase the efficiency of the Office and the quality of the services which it provides.
# United States Code/Title 2/Chapter 9C

From the Cornell Law School U.S. Code Collection

### § 287. Establishment

There is hereby established in the House of Representatives an office to be known as the Office of the Parliamentarian, hereinafter in this chapter referred to as the “Office”.

### § 287a. Parliamentarian

The management, supervision, and administration of the Office shall be vested in the Parliamentarian, who shall be appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives without regard to political affiliation and solely on the basis of fitness to perform the duties of the position. Any person so appointed shall serve at the pleasure of the Speaker.

### § 287b. Staff; Deputy Parliamentarian; delegation of functions

(a) With the approval of the Speaker, or in accordance with policies and procedures approved by the Speaker, the Parliamentarian shall appoint such attorneys and other employees as may be necessary for the prompt and efficient performance of the functions of the Office. Any such appointment shall be made without regard to political affiliation and solely on the basis of fitness to perform the duties of the position. Any person so appointed may be removed by the Parliamentarian with the approval of the Speaker, or in accordance with policies and procedures approved by the Speaker.
(b)
    (1) One of the attorneys appointed under subsection (a) of this section shall be designated by the Parliamentarian as Deputy Parliamentarian. During the absence or disability of the Parliamentarian, or when the office is vacant, the Deputy Parliamentarian shall perform the functions of the Parliamentarian.
    (2) The Parliamentarian may delegate to the Deputy Parliamentarian and to other employees appointed under subsection (a) of this section such of the functions of the Parliamentarian as the Parliamentarian considers necessary or appropriate.

### § 287c. Compensation

(a) The Parliamentarian shall be paid at a per annum gross rate established by the Speaker but not in excess of the rate of basic pay determined from time to time under subsection (b) of section 3 of the Speaker’s salary directive of June 11, 1968.
(b) Members of the staff of the Office other than the Parliamentarian shall be paid at per annum gross rates fixed by the Parliamentarian with the approval of the Speaker or in accordance with policies approved by the Speaker, but not in excess of the rate of basic pay set forth in subsection (a) of this section.

### § 287d. Expenditures

In accordance with policies and procedures approved by the Speaker, the Parliamentarian may make such expenditures as may be necessary or appropriate for the functioning of the Office.