OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Journal of Discourses/Volume 9

(Online document scan of Journal of Discourses, Volume 9)
Journal of Discourses Volume 9
Delivered By: PRESIDENT BRIGHAM YOUNG
HIS TWO COUNSELORS THE TWELVE APOSTLES, AND OTHERS
Reported By: G. D. WATT AND J. V. LONG
AND HUMBLY DEDICATED TO THE LATTER-DAY SAINTS IN ALL THE WORLD.
VOL. IX.
LIVERPOOL
EDITED AND PUBLISHED BY GEORGE Q. CANNON, 42, ISLINGTON,
LONDON:
LATTER-DAY SAINTS' BOOK DEPOT, 30, FLORENCE STREET, ISLINGTON, N.
1862.
Preface
After a long night of darkness, which has covered Christendom like a pall, the light of Heaven has again burst forth to cheer and bless mankind. The keys of knowledge, long lost from among men, have been, with the Priesthood, once more restored to the earth. For centuries there has been no man in Christendom authorised to say "Thus saith the Lord;" and men have had to be dependent upon the knowledge and experience of those who in former generations received the revelations of Jesus. But now this has changed. Through the Gospel which has been restored, with the Priesthood, in its fulness and purity, the mind of the Lord respecting the inhabitants of the earth is being made known unto men.
The Journal of Discoveries goes forth to the world as another record corroborating those already extant, bearing the same testimony to the immutable principles of salvation which they have borne, and giving additional light upon many points concerning the salvation of this generation on which they are silent. All men can be profited by perusing its pages and pondering over the words of truth and salvation as they flow in beautiful simplicity and power from the mouths of the Living Oracles.
That this Volume may go forth and fill its destined mission, and remain an imperishable memento of God's kindness and his desire to save His erring children, is the prayer of the
EDITOR.
# Khaled

Although the Saracinesca series is widely considered Marion Crawford's best work, the unusual adult fantasy Khaled: A Tale of Arabia, of a genii who has to win the love of Zehowah to gain a soul, was the one story nearest his heart.
'And if I destroy all your enemies and the enemies of your people, will you love me then, Zehowah?'
'Why should I love you then, more than now? What has war to do with love? Again, I ask, what is it to you whether I love you or not? Am I not your wife, and are you not my master? What is this love of which you talk? Is it a rich garment that you can wear? A precious stone that you can fasten in your turban? A rich carpet to spread in your house? A treasure of gold, a mountain of ambergris, a bushel of pearls from Oman? Why do you covet it? Am I not beautiful enough? Then is love henna to make my hair bright, or kohl to darken my eyes, or a boiled egg with almonds to smooth my face? I have all these things, and ointments from Egypt, and perfumes from Syria, and if I am not beautiful enough to please you, it is the will of Allah, and love will not make me fairer.'
KHALED: A TALE OF ARABIA
KHALED
A TALE OF ARABIA
BY
F. MARION CRAWFORD
AUTHOR OF 'MR. ISAACS,' 'DR. CLAUDIUS,' 'A ROMAN SINGER,'
ETC.
London
MACMILLAN AND CO. AND NEW YORK
1891
COPYRIGHT
1891
by
F. MARION CRAWFORD
* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
* Chapter VII
* Chapter VIII
* Chapter IX
* Chapter X
* Chapter XI
* Chapter XII
** end matter
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kingsbury v. Buckner

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
134 U.S. 650
Kingsbury v. Buckner

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kingsland v. Dorsey

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
338 U.S. 318
Kingsland v. Dorsey
Argued: Oct. 18-19, 1949. --- Decided: Nov 21, 1949
See 338 U.S. 939, 70 S.Ct. 341.
Mr. Robert L. Stern, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. William E. Leahy, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kingsley Books v. Brown

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinions

    Warren
    Douglas
    Brennan
United States Supreme Court
354 U.S. 436
Kingsley Books v. Brown
Argued: April 22, 1957. --- Decided: June 24, 1957
Mr. Emanuel Redfield, New York City, for appellants.
Mr. Seymour B. Quel, New York City, for appellee.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kingsley Books v. Brown/Dissent Brennan

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Warren Douglas Brennan
United States Supreme Court
354 U.S. 436
Kingsley Books v. Brown
Argued: April 22, 1957. --- Decided: June 24, 1957
Mr. Justice BRENNAN, dissenting.
I believe the absence in this New York obscenity statute of a right to jury trial is a fatal defect. Provision for jury trials in equity causes is made by § 430 of the New York Civil Practice Act, but only for discretionary jury trials, and advisory verdicts, to be followed or rejected by the trial judge as he deems fit and proper.
In Roth v. United States (Alberts v. State of California), 354 U.S. 476, 77 S.Ct. 1304, the Court held to be constitutional the following standard for judging obscenity-whether to the average person, applying contemporary community standards, the dominant theme of the material taken as a whole appeals to prurient interest. The statutes there involved allowed a jury trial of right, and we did not reach the question whether the safeguards necessary for securing the freedoms of speech and press for material not obscene included a jury determination of obscenity.
The jury represents a cross-section of the community and has a special aptitude for reflecting the view of the average person. Jury trial of obscenity therefore provides a peculiarly competent application of the standard for judging obscenity which, by its definition, calls for an appraisal of material according to the average person's application of contemporary community standards. A statute which does not afford the defendant, of right, a jury determination of obscenity falls short, in my view, of giving proper effect to the standard fashioned as the necessary safeguard demanded by the freedoms of speech and press for material which is not obscene. Of course, as with jury questions generally, the trial judge must initially determine that there is a jury question, i.e., that reasonable men may differ whether the material is obscene.
I would reverse the judgment and direct the restraining order to be dissolved.

## Notes

* ↑ Gilbert-Bliss' N.Y.Civil Practice Act, Vol. 3B, 1942, § 430.
* ↑ Learned v. Tillotson, 97 N.Y. 1; Bolognino v. Bolognino, 136 Misc. 656, 241 N.Y.S. 445 (S.Ct.), affirmed 231 App.Div. 817, 246 N.Y.S. 883.
* ↑ Parmelee v. United States, 72 App.D.C. 203, 205, 113 F.2d 729, 731; United States v. Dennett, 2 Cir., 39 F.2d 564, 568, 76 A.L.R. 1092.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kingsley Books v. Brown/Dissent Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Warren Douglas Brennan
United States Supreme Court
354 U.S. 436
Kingsley Books v. Brown
Argued: April 22, 1957. --- Decided: June 24, 1957
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, with whom Mr. Justice BLACK concurs, dissenting, announced by Mr. Justice BRENNAN.
There are two reasons why I think this restraining order should be dissolved.
First, the provision for an injunction pendente lite gives the State the paralyzing power of a censor. A decree can issue ex parte-without a hearing and without any ruling or finding on the issue of obscenity. This provision is defended on the ground that it is only a little encroachment, that a hearing must be promptly given and a finding of obscenity promptly made. But every publisher knows what awful effect a decree issued in secret can have. We tread here on First Amendment grounds. And nothing is more devastating to the rights that it guarantees than the power to restrain publication before even a hearing is held. This is prior restraint and censorship at its worst.
Second, the procedure for restraining by equity decree the distribution of all the condemned literature does violence to the First Amendment. The judge or jury which finds the publisher guilty in New York City acts on evidence that may be quite different from evidence before the judge or jury that finds the publisher not guilty in Rochester. In New York City the publisher may have been selling his tracts to juveniles, while in Rochester he may have sold to professional people. The nature of the group among whom the tracts are distributed may have an important bearing on the issue of guilt in any obscenity prosecution. Yet the present statute makes one criminal conviction conclusive and authorizes a statewide decree that subjects the distributor to the contempt power. I think every publication is a separate offense which entitles the accused to a separate trial. Juries or judges may differ in their opinions, community by community, case by case. The publisher is entitled to that leeway under our constitutional system. One is entitled to defend every utterance on its merits and not to suffer today for what he uttered yeaterday. Free speech is not to be regulated like diseased cattle and impure butter. The audience (in this case the judge or the jury) that hissed yesterday may applaud today, even for the same performance.
The regime approved by the Court goes far toward making the censor supreme. It also substitutes punishment by contempt for punishment by jury trial. In both respects it transgresses constitutional guarantees.
I would reverse this judgment and direct the restraining order to be dissolved.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kingsley Books v. Brown/Dissent Warren

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Warren Douglas Brennan
United States Supreme Court
354 U.S. 436
Kingsley Books v. Brown
Argued: April 22, 1957. --- Decided: June 24, 1957
Mr. Chief Justice WARREN, dissenting.
My views on the right of a State to protect its people against the purveyance of obscenity were expressed in Roth v. United States (Alberts v. State of California), 354 U.S. 476, 77 S.Ct. 1304. Here we have an entirely different situation.
This is not a criminal obscenity case. Nor is it a case ordering the destruction of materials disseminated by a person who has been convicted of an offense for doing so, as would be authorized under provisions in the laws of New York and other States. It is a case wherein the New York police, under a different state statute, located books which, in their opinion, were unfit for public use because of obscenity and then obtained a court order for their condemnation and destruction.
The majority opinion sanctions this proceeding. I would not. Unlike the criminal cases decided today, this New York law places the book on trial. There is totally lacking any standard in the statute for judging the book in context. The personal element basic to the criminal laws is entirely absent. In my judgment, the same object may have wholly different impact depending upon the setting in which it is placed. Under this statute, the setting is irrelevant.
It is the manner of use that should determine obscenity. It is the conduct of the individual that should be judged, not the quality of art or literature. To do otherwise is to impose a prior restraint and hence to violate the Constitution. Certainly in the absence of a prior judicial determination of illegal use, books, pictures and other objects of expression should not be destroyed. It savors too much of book burning.
I would reverse.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Italian Popular Tales/Bibliography

BIBLIOGRAPHY.
# Italian Literature taken from The Edinburgh Magazine and Literary Miscellany October 1820 to June 1821/Vincenzo da Filicaja 2

VINCENZO DA FILICAJA.
Quando giù dai gran monti bruna bruna, &c.
When from the mountain's brow, the gathering shades
 Of twilight fall, on one deep thought I dwell:
Day beams o'er other lands, if here she fades,
 Nor bids the Universe at once farewell.
But thou, I cry, my Country! what a night
 Spreads o'er thy glories one dark sweeping pall!
Thy thousand triumphs won by valour's might,
 And wisdom's voice—what now remains of all?
And see'st thou not th' ascending flame of war,
Burst thro' thy darkness, reddening from afar?
 Is not thy misery's evidence complete?
But if endurance can thy fall delay,
Still, still endure, devoted one! and say,
 If it be victory thus, but to retard defeat!
# Leaves of Grass (1882)/Calamus/I Dream'd in a Dream

I DREAM'D IN A DREAM.
I dream'd in a dream I saw a city invincible to the attacks of the whole of the rest of the earth, I dream'd that was the new city of Friends, Nothing was greater there than the quality of robust love, it led the rest, It was seen every hour in the actions of the men of that city, And in all their looks and words.
# Leaves of Grass (1882)/Calamus/Not Heat Flames up and Consumes

NOT HEAT FLAMES UP AND CONSUMES.
Not heat flames up and consumes, Not sea-waves hurry in and out, Not the air delicious and dry, the air of ripe summer, bears lightly along white down-balls of myriads of seeds, Wafted, sailing gracefully, to drop where they may; Not these, O none of these more than the flames of me, consuming, burning for his love whom I love, O none more than I hurrying in and out; Does the tide hurry, seeking something, and never give up? O I the same, O nor down-balls nor perfumes, nor the high rain-emitting clouds, are borne through the open air, Any more than my soul is borne through the open air, Wafted in all directions O love, for friendship, for you.
# Leaves of Grass (1882)/Calamus/Full of Life now

FULL OF LIFE NOW.
Full of life now, compact, visible, I, forty years old the eighty-third year of the States, ​To one a century hence or any number of centuries hence, To you yet unborn these, seeking you.
When you read these I that was visible am become invisible, Now it is you, compact, visible, realizing my poems, seeking me, Fancying how happy you were if I could be with you and become your comrade;
# Leaves of Grass (1882)/Calamus/No Labor-Saving Machine

NO LABOR-SAVING MACHINE.
No labor-saving machine, Nor discovery have I made, Nor will I be able to leave behind me any wealthy bequest to found a hospital or library, Nor reminiscence of any deed of courage for America, Nor literary success nor intellect, nor book for the book-shelf, But a few carols vibrating through the air I leave, For comrades and lovers.
# Leaves of Grass (1882)/Calamus/Not Heaving from my Ribb'd Breast Only

NOT HEAVING FROM MY RIBB'D BREAST ONLY.
Not heaving from my ribb'd breast only, Not in sighs at night in rage dissatisfied with myself, Not in those long-drawn, ill-supprest sighs, Not in many an oath and promise broken, Not in my wilful and savage soul's volition, Not in the subtle nourishment of the air, Not in this beating and pounding at my temples and wrists, Not in the curious systole and diastole within which will one day cease, Not in many a hungry wish told to the skies only, Not in cries, laughter, defiances, thrown from me when alone far in the wilds, Not in husky pantings through clinch'd teeth, Not in sounded and resounded words, chattering words, echoes, dead words, Not in the murmurs of my dreams while I sleep, Nor the other murmurs of these incredible dreams of every day, Nor in the limbs and senses of my body that take you and dismiss you continually—not there, Not in any or all of them O adhesiveness! O pulse of my life! Need I that you exist and show yourself any more than in these songs.
# Leaves of Grass (1882)/Calamus/For You O Democracy

FOR YOU O DEMOCRACY.
Come, I will make the continent indissoluble, I will make the most splendid race the sun ever shone upon, I will make divine magnetic lands, With the love of comrades, With the life-long love of comrades.
I will plant companionship thick as trees along all the rivers of America, and along the shores of the great lakes, and all over the prairies, I will make inseparable cities with their arms about each other's necks, By the love of comrades. By the manly love of comrades.
For you these from me, O Democracy, to serve you ma femme! For you, for you I am trilling these songs.
# Leaves of Grass (1882)/Calamus/Here the Frailest Leaves of Me

HERE THE FRAILEST LEAVES OF ME.
Here the frailest leaves of me and yet my strongest lasting, Here I shade and hide my thoughts, I myself do not expose them, And yet they expose me more than all my other poems.
# Leaves of Grass (1882)/Calamus/In Paths Untrodden

IN PATHS UNTRODDEN.
In paths untrodden, In the growth by margins of pond-waters, Escaped from the life that exhibits itself, From all the standards hitherto publish'd, from the pleasures, profits, conformities, Which too long I was offering to feed my soul, Clear to me now standards not yet publish'd, clear to me that my soul, That the soul of the man I speak for rejoices in comrades, Here by myself away from the clank of the world, Tallying and talk'd to here by tongues aromatic, ​No longer abashed, (for in this secluded spot I can respond as I would not dare elsewhere,) Strong upon me the life that does not exhibit itself, yet contains all the rest, Resolv'd to sing no songs to-day but those of manly attachment, Projecting them along that substantial life, Bequeathing hence types of athletic love, Afternoon this delicious Ninth-month in my forty-first year, I proceed for all who are or have been young men, To tell the secret of my nights and days,
# Leaves of Grass (1882)/Calamus/I Hear It was Charged against Me

I HEAR IT WAS CHARGED AGAINST ME.
I hear it was charged against me that I sought to destroy institutions, But really I am neither for nor against institutions, (What indeed have I in common with them? or what with the destruction of them?) Only I will establish in the Mannahatta and in every city of these States inland and seaboard, And in the fields and woods, and above every keel little or large that dents the water, Without edifices or rules or trustees or any argument, The institution of the dear love of comrades.
# Leaves of Grass (1882)/Calamus/I Saw in Louisiana a Live-Oak Growing

I SAW IN LOUISIANA A LIVE-OAK GROWING.
I saw in Louisiana a live-oak growing, All alone stood it and the moss hung down from the branches, Without any companion it grew there uttering joyous leaves of dark green, And its look, rude, unbending, lusty, made me think of myself, But I wonder'd how it could utter joyous leaves standing alone there without its friend near, for I knew I could not, ​And I broke off a twig with a certain number of leaves upon it, and twined around it a little moss, And brought it away, and I have placed it in sight in my room, It is not needed to remind me as of my own dear friends, (For I believe lately I think of little else than of them,) Yet it remains to me a curious token, it makes me think of manly love; For all that, and though the live-oak glistens there in Louisiana solitary in a wide flat space, Uttering joyous leaves all its life without a friend a lover near,
# Les Misérables/Volume 4/Book Thirteenth

Chapters:
* Chapter 1: From the Rue Plumet to the Quartier Saint-Denis
* Chapter 2: An Owl's View of Paris
* Chapter 3: The Extreme Edge
# Les Misérables/Volume 4/Book Twelfth

Chapters:
* Chapter 1: History of Corinthe from its Foundation
* Chapter 2: Preliminary Gayeties
* Chapter 3: Night begins to descend upon Grantaire
* Chapter 4: An Attempt to console the Widow Hucheloup
* Chapter 5: Preparations
* Chapter 6: Waiting
* Chapter 7: The Man recruited in the Rue des Billettes
* Chapter 8: Many Interrogation Points with Regard to a Certain Le Cabuc, whose Name may not have been Le Cabuc
# Landon in The Literary Gazette 1823/Songs 7

Literary Gazette 1st November 1823, Page 697-698
ORIGINAL POETRY.
SONGS.
The ring you gave, the kiss you gave,
 The curl of raven hair,
Pledges of truth and gifts of love,
 Where are they now?—oh where?
The ring is broken,—and by whom?
 The kiss has been profaned;
And many, many, bitter tears
 That shining curl has stained!—
Yes, each and all are wholly changed,—
 More changed they could not be;
But the worst change is that which time,
 False one! has wrought in thee.
I will swear to thee by that bright star,
 Like thine own dark eyes' light;
I will be true, dear love! to thee,
 As that star to the night.
I will swear to thee by that sweet tree,
 With the red rose blossoming;
I will be constant as those flowers
 Are constant to the Spring.
I will swear to thee by the green leaves,
 By the low song of the bees;
By moonlight, by the violets,
 And by the summer breeze.
I will swear to thee by frequent things,
 That, when you are away,
All round you may recall the words
 You taught my heart to say.L. E. L.
# Landon in The Literary Gazette 1823/Stanzas 2

Literary Gazette, 24th May 1823, Page 332-333
STANZAS.
Farewell, farewell! then both are free,—
 At least we both renounce our chain;
And love's most precious boon will be
 Never to feel the like again.
There is no gift beneath the sky,
 No fairy charm, no syren lure,
Would tempt me yet again to try
 What love once taught me to endure.
Its burning hopes, its icy fears,
 Its heartlessness, its sick despair;
The mingled pains of many years
 Crowd into its one hour of care!
I blame you not,—you could not tell
 That love to such a heart as mine
Was life or death, was Heaven or hell;
 You could not judge my heart by thine.
Each pulse throbs to recall again
 What once it was my lot to feel;
I have flung off my weary chain,
 The scar it left I may not heal. L. E. L.