# History of the Anti-Corn Law League

* related portals: Corn Laws.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
HISTORY
OF THE
ANTI-CORN-LAW LEAGUE.
BY
ARCHIBALD PRENTICE,
ONE OF ITS EXECUTIVE COUNCIL,
AUTHOR OF
"HISTORICAL SKETCHES OF MANCHESTER;" "A TOUR IN THE UNITED STATES," &c.
VOL. 1
LONDON.
W. & F. G. CASH, BISHOPSGATE STREET.
1853.
A. IRELAND AND CO., PRINTERS,
PALL MALL, MARKET STREET, MANCHESTER.
To JOHN CHILDS, Esq.
OF BUNGAY, IN SUFFOLK,
A ZEALOUS PROMOTER, FROM EARLY MANHOOD, OF
CIVIL, RELIGIOUS, AND COMMERCIAL LIBERTY,
AND, WITH THE ABLE ASSISTANCE OF JOSEPH HUME
AND A FEW OTHER COADJUTORS,
THE SUCCESSFUL ABATER OF THE MONOPOLY
WHICH TRIPLED OR QUADRUPLED THE PRICE OF THE
BIBLE,
THIS HISTORY OF THE
DESTRUCTION OF ANOTHER UNRIGHTEOUS MONOPOLY,
IS INSCRIBED, AS A TESTIMONY OF SINCERE RESPECT
FOR HIS UNDEVIATING ADHERENCE TO PRINCIPLE,
AND AS A MEMORIAL OF
FORTY YEARS' UNINTERRUPTED FRIENDSHIP
BETWEEN HIM AND THE AUTHOR.
PREFACE.
In my preface to "Historical Sketches and Personal Recollections of Manchester from 1792 to 1832," I said: "When I disposed of my interest in the Manchester Times, and retired from its management, after twenty-three years' labour as a journalist, it was suggested to me that as, for a considerable part of my life, I had taken part in movements for important purposes, a biographical memoir would be well received. The suggestion was natural enough from those who, having read my newspaper from the time they left school until they were men, taking an active part in public business, regarded me as their political teacher. My reply was, that there was nothing in the events of my life that would interest any one beyond the narrow limits of a local "School;" but, on farther consideration, I thought that some account of the progress of liberal opinion in such a place as Manchester, and brief notices of the part, however humble, I had taken in its formation, would be not uninteresting and not uninstructive to its inhabitants, and those of the surrounding very ​populous district; and that there and elsewhere the history of what had been done might be an encouragement further to do."
In that volume I endeavoured to show how the despised minority, patient and persevering, became the overwhelming majority, and how one reform, to be the instrument of obtaining other necessary reforms, was at length triumphantly obtained. It appeared to me, that to show how that instrument was used, and what part Manchester took in subsequent struggles for the repeal of the Corn Law, which ought to have been the first fruit of the Reform Act, would be fit occupation for the historian's pen; and when the second edition of the "Historical Sketches" was put to press, I began to prepare materials for their continuation in another publication. I soon found that the History of the League would, of itself require to be given at a length which would preclude the insertion of any of my personal recollections of Manchester, except such as would relate to events which led to the prominent part taken by this great town in the arduous struggle for free trade.
It may be an objection to my undertaking that it is too early to write a history so recently terminated; and certainly, an actor in the events recorded might look back, after a series of years, with greater calmness than he may be supposed to experience when he writes immediately ​after the heat of contest; but as Mr. Roebuck, in his History of the Whigs, remarks, "a contemporary historian is a witness as well as an historian—a witness indeed, giving his testimony under the best security for its accuracy; liability to instant denial and searching cross-examination."
A more serious objection may be, that an impartial history cannot be expected from one whose participation in the movement might influence his judgment to a more favourable one of those who determinedly opposed it, than either class deserved. To this my reply would be, that he who has been a partizan from a deep conviction of the humanity and justice of a cause, is quite as likely to be a truthful historian as one who, not having formed any decisive opinion as to the necessity of the contest on one side or the other, held aloof from it, and was utterly indifferent to its great results.
A more formidable objection presented itself when I first contemplated a History of the League—the difficulty of speaking of living men, its members, without incurring the charge of adulation; but, on consideration, I felt that while I confined myself to a faithful, plain and unambitious narrative of their labours, the charge could not justly be laid at my door. A restrospection of the whole circumstances ​of the movement rather inclines me to wonder why, during its continuance, I did not feel a higher admiration of the bravery, the knowledge, the prudence, and the patriotism of its leaders.
For any sins of commission or omission in this work I alone am responsible. I have consulted no one as to what I should put in or leave out, and no one has seen my manuscript but the printer. I have thus preserved the freedom which an author ought to enjoy when he is recording the actions of men, many of whom are his associates and personal friends, while they are freed from any suspicion of having assisted in the record of their own doings.
Manchester, 15th December, 1852
CONTENTS
CHAPTER I.
p.1
CHAPTER II.
p. 18.
CHAPTER III.
p. 34.
CHAPTER IV.
p. 49.
CHAPTER V.
p. 64.
CHAPTER VI.
p. 78.
CHAPTER VII.
p. 90.
CHAPTER VIII.
p. 107.
CHAPTER IX.
p. 124.
CHAPTER X.
p. 141.
CHAPTER XI.
p. 160.
CHAPTER XII.
p. 175.
CHAPTER XIII.
p. 190.
CHAPTER XIV.
p. 200.
CHAPTER XV.
p. 222.
CHAPTER. XVI.
p. 235.
CHAPTER XVII.
p. 253.
CHAPTER XVIII.
p. 272.
CHAPTER XIX.
p. 286.
CHAPTER. XX.
p. 302.
CHAPTER XXI.
p. 317.
CHAPTER XXII.
p. 333.
CHAPTER XXIII.
p. 346.
CHAPTER XXIV.
p. 370.
CHAPTER XXV.
p. 390.
CHAPTER XXVI.
p. 410.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse