OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Richardson v. Wright/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Douglas Brennan
PER CURIAM.
We noted probable jurisdiction of these appeals, 404 U.S. 819 (1971), to consider the applicability of [p208] Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970), to the suspension and termination of disability benefit payments pursuant to § 225 of the Social Security Act, 70 Stat. 817, 42 U.S.C. § 425, and implementing regulations of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Shortly before oral argument, we were advised that the Secretary had adopted new regulations, effective December 27, 1971, governing the procedures to be followed by the Social Security Administration in determining whether to suspend or terminate disability benefits. These procedures include the requirement that a recipient of benefits be given notice of a proposed suspension and the reasons therefor, plus an opportunity to submit rebuttal evidence. In light of that development, we belief that the appropriate course is to withhold judicial action pending reprocessing, under the new regulations, of the determinations here in dispute. If that process results in a determination of entitlement to disability benefits, there will be no need to consider the constitutional claim that claimants are entitled to an opportunity to make an oral presentation. In the context of a comprehensive complex administrative program, the administrative process must have a reasonable opportunity to evolve procedures to meet needs as they arise. Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the District Court for the District of Columbia, 321 F. Supp. 383 (1971), with direction to that court to remand the cause to the Secretary and to retain jurisdiction for such further proceedings, if any, as may be necessary upon completion of the administrative procedure.
Vacated and remanded.
# Riche v. Broadfield

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
April Term, 1768.
William Allen, Chief Justice. :
| John Lawrence, | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ Justices. |
| Thomas Willing, | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ Justices. |
Riche and Richards versus Broadfield.
An Account of Sales of an Adventure shipt to New-York, said to be signed by the Factor, offered in evidence to prove a loss on the Goods. Objected, that the Factor himself ought to have been brought to give evidence, viva voce, or at least the account should have been proved by him, and certified under the City Seal of New-York, agreeably, to the directions of the act of parliament with reward to the proving Colony debts in England.–Answered, That this being a Mercantile Transaction, such Evidence as Merchants ususally admit as prooss of a foreign Transaction, should be received here. ​ By the Court.–The strict Rules of Law with regard to Evidence ought not to be extended to Mercantile Transactions. In this Case, on proving the hand Writing of the Factor, let the Account of Sales be given in Evidences; which was accordingly done.
# Riches

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Riches."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Riches, a poem by Ralph Waldo Emerson
* Riches, a poem by Sara Teasdale
* Riches, a poem by William Blake
# Richardson’s Lessee v. Campbell

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
The Lessee of Richardson versus Campbell.
Plaintiff supported his Title by a Patent dated in 1762. The Defendant produced Receipts from the Proprietary’s Officers, with a Warrant from Mr. Peters, Secretary of the Land Office, several Years prior to Plaintiff’s Patent, and proved upwards of twenty Years Possession; but the Plaintiff contending that the Receipts were only for Money paid on accompt of an adjacent Tract, and that there was some imposition on the Land Officer when the Warrant was granted; the Defendant produced a Witness to prove a parol Declaration of Mr. Thomas Penn (when he was in the Country) that the Land in dispute was sold to Defendant.–This piece of Evidence was opposed by the Plaintiff, and refused By the Court.
N.B The Plaintiff could prove no imposition on the Officer, and the Court gave a Charge in favour of the Defendant, and the Plaintiff would not take the Verdict, but became nonsuit.
# Richbourg Motor Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
281 U.S. 528
Richbourg Motor Company v. United States
Argued: April 25, 1930. --- Decided: May 19, 1930
Messrs. Joseph G. Myerson, of New York City, and R. R. Williams, of Asheville, N. C., for petitioner Richbourg Motor Co.
Mr. Duane R. Dills, of New York City, for petitioner Davies Motors, Inc.
The Attorney General and Mr. Seth W. Richardson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Richelieu; or, The Conspiracy

RICHELIEU; OR,The Conspiracy
A PLAY IN FIVE ACTS
BY
SIR EDWARD BULWER LYTTON
Printed from the most approved prompt-books, showing all the usual cuts and the traditional stage business.
BOSTON Walter H. Baker & Co. 1896
Contents
Introduction TBD
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Queen Victoria's Proclamation as Empress of India

* related portals: India, United Kingdom.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Given on 28 April 1876.
By the QUEEN.
A PROCLAMATION.
VICTORIA, R.
WHEREAS an Act has been passed in the present Session of Parliament, intituled “An Act to enable Her Most Gracious Majesty to make an Addition to the Royal Style and Titles at present appertaining to the Imperial Crown of the United Kingdom and its Dependencies,” which Act recites that, by the Act for the Union of Great Britain and Ireland, it was provided that after such Union the Royal Style and Titles appertaining to the Imperial Crown of the United Kingdom and its Dependencies should be such as His Majesty by His Royal Proclamation under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom should be pleased to appoint: and which Act also recites that, by virtue of the said Act, and of a Royal Proclamation under the Great Seal, dated the 1st day of January, 1801, Our present Style and Titles are “Victoria, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, Queen, Defender of the Faith:” and which Act also recites that, by the Act for the better Government of India, it was enacted that the Government of India, theretofore vested in the East India Company in trust for Us, should become vested in Us, and that India should thenceforth be governed by Us and in Our name, and that it is expedient that there should be a recognition of the transfer of Government so made by means of an addition to be made to Our Style and Titles: And which Act, after the said recitals, enacts that it shall be lawful for Us, with a view to such recognition as aforesaid, of the transfer of the Government of India, by Our Royal Proclamation under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom, to make such addition to the Style and Titles at present appertaining to the Imperial Crown of the United Kingdom and its Dependencies as to Us may seem meet; We have thought fit, by and with the advice of Our Privy Council, to appoint and declare, and We hereby, by and with the said advice, appoint and declare that henceforth, so far as conveniently may be, on all occasions and in all instruments wherein Our Style and Titles are used, save and except all Charters, Commissions, Letters Patent, Grants, Writs, Appointments, and other like instruments, not extending in their operation beyond the United Kingdom, the following addition shall be made to the Style and Titles at present appertaining to the Imperial Crown of the United Kingdom and its Dependencies; that is to say, in the Latin tongue in these words: “Indiæ Imperatrix.” And in the English tongue in these words: “Empress of India.”
Given at Our Court at Windsor, the twenty-eighth day of April, one thousand eight hundred and seventy-six, in the thirty-ninth year of Our Reign.
GOD save the QUEEN.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Queen Victoria

subject is Author:Victoria of the United Kingdom
QUEEN VICTORIA, PRINCE ALBERT AND THE ROYAL FAMILY.
QUEEN VICTORIA
BY
LYTTON STRACHEY
NEW YORK
HARCOURT, BRACE AND COMPANY
1921
COPYRIGHT, 1921, BY HARCOURT, BRACE AND COMPANY, INC.
THE QUINN & BODEN COMPANY RAHWAY N. J
CONTENTS
ILLUSTRATIONS
​Authority for every important statement of fact in the following pages will he found in the footnotes. The full titles of the works to which reference is made are given in the Bibliography at the end of the volume.
The author is indebted to the Trustees of the British Museum for their permission to make use of certain unpublished passages in the manuscript of the Greville Memoirs.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Reynolds v. United States (292 U.S. 443)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
292 U.S. 443
Reynolds v. United States (292 U.S. 443)
Argued: May 3, 1934. --- Decided: May 28, 1934
Messrs. Francis W. Hill, Jr., and David A. Pine, both of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
The Attorney General and Mr. H. Brian Holland, of Philadelphia, Pa., for the United States.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Reynolds v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Reynolds v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Reynolds v. United States (98 U.S. 145)
* Reynolds v. United States (292 U.S. 443)
* Reynolds v. United States (565 U.S. 432)
See also United States v. Reynolds.
# Royal Naval Biography/Foley, Osborne

Layout 2
OSBORNE FOLEY, Esq. [Captain of 1833.]
Nephew to the late Admiral Sir Thomas Foley, G.C.B., Rear-Admiral of Great Britain, who died commander-in-Chief at Portsmouth, Jan. 9th, 1833.
This officer entered the royal navy in 1812; obtained his first commission on the 5th Feb. 1821; and was promoted to the rank of commander, while serving under the flag of Sir Edward Codrington, in the Asia 84, on the Mediterranean station, April 28th, 1827. He was made a captain, in compliment to the memory of his gallant uncle, Jan. 16th, 1833.
# Royal Naval Biography/Foote, William Williams

Layout 2
WILLIAM WILLIAMS FOOTE, Esq. [Post-Captain of 1810.]
Was posted Oct. 21, 1810. He married Miss Hill, of Upminster.
Agents.– Messrs. Cooke, Halford and Son.
# Royal Naval Biography/Forbes, Andrew

Layout 2
ANDREW FORBES, Esq. [Commander.]
Served as midshipman under Captains Lord Cochrane and Thomas Rogers, in the Imperieuse frigate and Kent 74, on the Mediterranean station; passed his examination, at Plymouth, in Jan. 1813; obtained his first commission on the 17th Feb. 1815; was appointed to the Tyne 26, Captain James Kearney White, fitting out for the West India station, Feb. 18th, 1821; removed to the Scout 18, Captain James Wigston, July 5th, 1822; and promoted to the command of the Thracian sloop, June 16th, 1823.
addendum.
ANDREW FORBES, Esq. (P. 127.) [Captain of 1834.]
Was advanced to the rank of captain on the 27th Aug. 1834.
# Royal Naval Biography/Flint, William

Layout 2
WILLIAM FLINT, Esq. [Post-Captain of 1811.]
Received his first commission in April 1802; obtained the rank of Commander Mar. 1, 1809; and was made a Post-Captain Mar. 1, 1811.
This officer married the sister of Sir Stamford T. Raffles, who procured him the appointment of Harbour-Master at Bencoolen, from whence he has since removed to Sincapore, as Colonial Master-Attendant.
Agents.– Messrs. Stilwell.
# Royal Naval Biography/Foote, John

Layout 2
JOHN FOOTE, Esq. [Captain of 1827.]
Obtained the rank of lieutenant in May, 1801; and had the misfortune to be wounded and taken prisoner while commanding a gun-boat, manned by the Queen 98, and sent from Gibraltar to afford protection to a convoy passing through the Gut, in Oct. 1806. The following is a copy of his official letter to Rear-Admiral Purvis, by whom he had been sent on that service:
Town of Tariffa, Oct. 26th, 1806.
“Sir,– With heart-felt anguish I acquaint you of the capture of H.M. gun-boat Hannah, yesterday forenoon, by a Spanish privateer, of 4 guns and 70 men.
“Being off Cabritta Point, I discovered a latine-rigged vessel in the middle of the Gut, a few miles to leeward of me, towing a merchantman towards the Spanish coast; and conceiving it my duty to endeavour to regain her, I made all sail after them. Upon coming within gun-shot, I perceived the enemy was a large three-masted vessel, of much superior force to the gun-boat; I therefore, after exchanging a few shot, and finding she knew her superiority, by casting off the tow, and tacking after mc, endeavoured to escape; – she soon, however, got so close as to do execution with her grape; and our ammunition being nearly expended, I determined to try the event by boarding her ; but on coming alongside, such a number of men jumped into us, as obliged us to act on the defensive. After fighting on the deck about ten minutes, I looked around, and saw scarce an Englishman standing, and another privateer coming up close to us; I therefore determined to save the lives of the few brave fellows that were left, by striking the British flag. I send this by Mr. Spargo, midshipman, to whom I am indebted for writing it, (being wounded in my left arm, and the doctor having bled me in the other) as well as for his gallantry in the engagement; and I cannot finish without saying how much I owe to the bravery of young Mr. Millett, midshipman, and the whole of the gun-boat’s crew. I herewith enclose a list of killed, &c.
(Signed)“John Foote.”
“This contest,” says Lord Collingwood, “was highly honorable to Lieutenant Foote and his men;” of whom six were slain, two drowned, and eleven wounded.
We next find this officer serving as flag-lieutenant to Sir Richard Bickerton, at Portsmouth; where he continued until promoted to the command of the Rapid sloop, Sept. 29th, 1813. His subsequent appointments were, – Oct. 9th, 1814, ​to the Goldfinch of 10 guns, which vessel, after having been employed on “special service,” was paid off at Sheerness, in Dec. 1815: – and, May 12th, 1827, to the Britannia 120, bearing the flag of Earl Northesk, and commanded by Captain Edward Hawker, at Plymouth. He was advanced to his present rank on the 29th of Sept. 1827.
# Royal Naval Biography/Foley, Richard

Layout 2
RICHARD FOLEY, Esq. [Post-Captain of 1814.]
Son of the late Richard Foley, of Haverfordwest, co. Pembroke, Esq. and nephew to Admiral Sir Thomas Foley, G.C.B. under whose auspices he entered the navy, as a midshipman, on board the Elephant 74, in 1800. After the battle of Copenhagen, we find him serving in the Medusa frigate. Captain (now Sir John) Gore, and subsequently in the Ambuscade 32, Captain William D’Urban, on the Mediterranean station. In 1806, he received a wound, at the siege of the Tremiti islands. His first commission bears date April 24, 1807.
From this period Mr. Foley successively served as lieutenant of the Illustrious 74, Eagle of the same force, and Barfleur 98, until promoted to the command of the Zenobia brig, employed on the coasts of Spain and Portugal, May 11, 1812. He obtained post rank, June 7, 1814. The death of Captain Foley’s father has been alluded to in our memoir of Sir Thomas Foley, where we have also given an extract of a letter from Nelson to his gallant companion in arms, condoling with him on his loss, and desiring always to be reminded of his nephew.
Agents.– Messrs. Chard.
* ↑ See Suppl. Part II. p. 439.
* ↑ See Vol. I. Part I. p. 371.
# Royal Naval Biography/Foot, Matthew

Layout 2
MATTHEW FOOT, Esq. [Commander.]
Obtained his first commission on the 2d Feb. 1826; and served as flag-lieutenant to Admiral Sir Manley Dixon, commander-in-chief at Plymouth, from May 1830, until advanced to his present rank. May 5th, 1833,
# Republic Act No. 10

* information about this edition.
* related portals: Republic Acts of the Philippines, Philippines.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
* Table of contents
* Sec. 1 Sec. 2
AN ACT PENALIZING USURPATION OF PUBLIC AUTHORITY

## Section 1.

Any person who, with or without pretense of official position, shall perform any act pertaining to the Government, or to any person in authority or public officer, without being lawfully entitled to do so, shall be punished with imprisonment for not less than two years nor more than ten years.

## Section 2.

This Act shall take effect upon its approval.
Approved: August 5, 1946
This work is in the public domain because it is a work of the Philippine government (see Republic Act No. 8293 Sec. 176).
All official Philippine texts of a legislative, administrative, or judicial nature, or any official translation thereof, are ineligible for copyright.
An additional license tag is required in order to demonstrate why this work is freely licensed or in the public domain in the United States.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Reproof

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Reproof."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Reproof, a poem by Isa Blagden
* Reproof, a poem by Helen Elizabeth Coolidge
# Reproach not Death

"Reproach not Death, nor charge to him, in wonder"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1909), "Reproach not Death" in Lyrics of Life (1909).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1911), "Reproach not Death" in Scribner's Magazine (November 1911).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "Reproach not Death" in Poems I.

## References

* ↑ View this version at Google Books.
# Reproduction of Federal Law Order

* information about this edition.
* related portals: Legislative documents, Canada.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
The Reproduction of Federal Law Order was made by order in council in 1996 giving permission for the public to reproduce federal legislation and regulations. It also purports to apply to decisions by federally constituted courts and tribunals. The only conditions are that due diligence be taken to ensure accuracy, and the document is not represented as an official version.
SI/97—5 Registration 8 January, 1997
Other than Statutory Authority
Reproduction of Federal Law Order
P.C. 1996-1995 19 December, 1996
Whereas it is of fundamental importance to a democratic society that its law be widely known and that its citizens have unimpeded access to that law;
And whereas the Government of Canada wishes to facilitate access to its law by licensing the reproduction of federal law without charge or permission;
Therefore His Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Canadian Heritage, the Minister of Industry, the Minister of Public Works and Government Services, the Minister of Justice and the Treasury Board, hereby makes the annexed Reproduction of Federal Law Order.
Reproduction of Federal Law Order
Anyone may, without charge or request for permission, reproduce enactments and consolidations of enactments of the Government of Canada, and decisions and reasons for decisions of federally-constituted courts and administrative tribunals, provided due diligence is exercised in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced and the reproduction is not represented as an official version.
SI/98-113(F).
This work is reproduced under the terms of the Reproduction of Federal Law Order for enactments of the Government of Canada. This document is not an official version, and not endorsed by the Government of Canada.
This work is also in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
Canadian legislation is under Crown Copyright pursuant to Section 12 of the Copyright Act for 50 years after the year of first publication. That section and the lack of modern case law make it unclear whether these documents remain protected by perpetual Crown rights and privileges after that term ends.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Representative women of New England/Vina B. Peakes

​VINA BOYNTON PEAKES, of Boston, is an energetic business woman who has achieved success in the field of insurance. The necessity of earning her owm livelihood came about through the death of her husband. After turning over in her own mind the few profitable occupations that offered honorable employment for women, she decided upon insurance, and accordingly studied the methods employed by men in the presentation of that subject, striving in particular to acquire a direct and business-like manner. Her efforts were successful, and, step by step, she has advanced from her early beginnings until to-day she stands as one of the leading women insurance underwriters of Boston, which city, it may be said, has the only association of women underwriters in the world. Mrs. Peakes is an independent agent, not being connected with a women's department. She approves of the admission of women to all professions and all suitable lines of business, and takes great pleasure in noting the success they are achieving in their various undertakings.
# Regeneration

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Regeneration."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, quotes, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Regeneration (1951), a work by Charles Dye and Katherine MacLean
* Regeneration (1901), a book by Thomas Hunt Morgan
* Regeneration, a sermon by John Charles Ryle
* Regeneration (1915), a silent film directed by Raoul Walsh
# Regents of University System of Georgia v. Carroll

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
338 U.S. 586
Regents of University System of Georgia v. Carroll
Argued: Dec. 9, 1949. --- Decided: Feb 6, 1950
Mr. Hamilton Lokey, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner.
Mr. James A. Branch, Atlanta, Ga., for respondents.
Mr. Max Goldman, Washington, D.C., for the Federal Communications Commission, as amicus curiae, by Special leave of Court.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse