OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Folk Tales from Tibet (1906)/The Frog and the Crow

STORY No. VIII.
THE FROG AND THE CROW.
A Crow once caught a fine fat Frog, and taking him in her bill she flew with him to the roof of a neighbouring house in order to devour him at her leisure. As she alighted on the roof of the house the Frog gave an audible chuckle.
"What are you laughing at, Brother Frog?" said the Crow.
"Oh, nothing, Sister Crow," said the Frog; "never mind me. I was just thinking to myself that, as it fortunately happens, my Father lives close by here, on this very roof, and as he is an exceedingly fierce, strong man, he will certainly avenge my death if anyone injures me."
The Crow did not quite like this, and thinking it as well to be on the safe side she hopped off to another corner of the roof near to where a gutter led away the rain water by means of a small hole in the parapet and a wooden spout. She paused here for a moment and was just about to begin to swallow the Frog when the Frog gave another chuckle.
"What are you laughing at this time, Brother Frog?" asked the Crow.
​"Oh, it's only a small matter, Sister Crow, hardly worth mentioning," replied the Frog, "but it just occurred to me that my Uncle, who is even a stronger and fiercer man than my Father, lives in this very gutter, and that if anybody was to do me an injury here they would have a very small chance of escaping from his clutches."
The Crow was somewhat alarmed at hearing this, and she thought that, on the whole, it would be safer to leave the roof altogether; so again picking up the Frog in her bill she flew off to the ground below, and alighted near the edge of a well. Here she placed the Frog upon the ground and was just about to eat him when the Frog said:
"Oh, Sister Crow, I notice your bill seems rather blunt. Before you begin to eat me don't you think it would be a good thing to sharpen it a little. You can strop it very nicely on that flat stone over there."
The Crow, thinking this was a good idea, took two or three hops towards the stone, and began sharpening her bill. As soon as she had turned her back the Frog gave one desperate jump, and dived into the well.
As soon as the Crow had made her bill nice and sharp she returned from the stone, and looked about for the Frog. Not finding him where she had left him she hopped to the edge of the well and peeped over, craning her head from side to side. Presently she spied the Frog in the water, and called out to him:
"Oh, Brother Frog, I was afraid you were lost. My ​bill is quite nice and sharp now, so come along up and be eaten."
"I am so sorry, Sister Crow," replied the Frog, "but the fact is, I cannot get up the sides of this well. The best thing would be for you to come down here to eat me."
THE CROW AND THE FROG IN THE GUTTER.
# Final Report of the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol/Chapter 7/Section 7.11

Layout 2
​7.11 “REMEMBER THIS DAY FOREVER!”
After leaving the Rose Garden, the President returned to the dining room. At 6:01 p.m., he issued another tweet, the last of the day:
   These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long. Go home with love & in peace. Remember this day forever!
He retired to his residence for the evening at 6:27 p.m. A White House photographer captured the President walking back to the residence with an employee in tow, carrying personal items President Trump wished to bring home with him for the night. In the employee’s hands are the gloves the President was wearing while addressing the crowd at the Ellipse.
The President had one parting comment to the employee—the thing that was evidently occupying his mind even after an afternoon of violence—before he retired to his home.
"Mike Pence let me down," the President concluded.
# Forgotten Sorrow

A stranger grief than any grief by music told Is mine: regret for unremembered loves, and faces Veiled by the night of some unknown farewell, or places Lost in the dusty ebb and lapse of kingdoms old On the slow desert, rises vague and manifold Within my heart at summer twilight. Through the spaces Of all oblivion, voidly then my soul retraces Her dead lives given to the marbles and the mould In dim Palmyra, or some pink, enormous city Whose falling columns now the boles of mightier trees Support in far Siam…. All grievous love, and pity, All loveliness unheld for long, and long estranged, Appeals with voices, indistinguishably changed, Like bells in deep Atlantis, tolled by summer seas.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1961, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 62 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Forlorn, My Love

* "Forlorn, my love", in The Book of Scottish Song (1843), edited by Alexander Whitelaw
* "Forlorn, my Love", in The Poetical Works of Robert Burns (1887), edited by Alexander Smith
# Formal Investigation into the Circumstances Surrounding the Downing of Iran Air Flight 655 on 3 July 1988

* related portals: History of Asia.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
Declassified U.S. Navy investigation report into the downing of Iran Air Flight 655 by the U.S.S. Vincennes during the Iran-Iraq War.
Investigation Report
Formal Investigation into the Circumstances Surrounding the Downing of Iran Air Flight 655 on 3 July 1988
* Memorandum
* Formal Report
* Internal Report
* First Endorsement
* Second Endorsement
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Flora Hongkongensis/1/3

§ 3. The Stock.
22. The Stock of a herbaceous perennial, in its most complete state, includes a small portion of the summits of the previous year's roots, as well as of the base of the previous year's stems. Such stocks will increase yearly, so as at length to form dense tufts. They will often preserve through the winter a few leaves, amongst which are placed the buds which grow out into stems the following year, wliilst the under side of the stock emits new roots from or amongst the remains of the old ones. These perennial stocks only difier from the permanent base of an undershrub in the shortness of the perennial part of the stems and in their textm'e usually less woody.
23. In some perennials, however, the stock consists merely of a branch, which proceeds in autumn from the base of the stem either aboveground or underground, and produces one or more buds. This branch, or a portion of it, alone survives the winter. In the following year its buds produce the new stem and roots, whilst the rest of the plant, even the branch on which these buds were formed, has died away. These annual stocks, called sometimes hybemacula, offsets, or stolons, keep up the commvmication between the annual stem and root of one year and those of the following year, thus forming altogether a perennial plant.
24. The stock, whether annual or perennial, is often entirely undergroimd or root-like. This is the rootstock, to which some botanists limit the meaning of the term rhizome. When the stock is entfrely root-hke, it is popvdai-ly called the crown of the root.
25. The term tuber is applied to a short, thick, more or less succulent rootstock or rhizome, as well as to a root of that shape (20), although some botanists propose to restrict its meaning to the one or to the other. An Orchis tuber, called by some a knob, is an annual tuberous rootstock with one bud at the top. A potato is an aimual tuberous rootstock with several buds.
26. A bulb is a stock of a shape approaching to globular, usually rather conical above and flattened underneath, in which the bud or buds are concealed, or nearly so, under scales. These scales are the more or less thickened bases of the decayed leaves of the preceding year, or of the undeveloped leaves of the future year, or of both. Bulbs are annual or perennial, usually imderground or close to the ground, but occasionally buds in the axils of the upper leaves become transformed into bulbs. Bulbs are said to be scaly when their scales are thick and loosely imbricated, tunicated when the scales are thinner, broader, and closely rolled round each other in concentric layers.
27. A corm is a tuberous rootstock, usually annual, shaped like a bulb, but in which the bud or buds are not covered by scales, or of which the scales are very thin and membranous.
# Flora of Kwangtung and Hongkong

* related portals: Botany.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
[All Rights Reserved.]
ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS, KEW.
BULLETIN
OF
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION.
ADDITIONAL SERIES X.
FLORA OF KWANGTUNG AND HONGKONG (CHINA)
BEING AN ACCOUNT OF THE FLOWERING PLANTS, FERNS AND FERN ALLIES TOGETHER WITH KEYS FOR THEIR DETERMINATION PRECEDED BY A MAP AND INTRODUCTION,
BY
STEPHEN TROYTE DUNN, B.A., F.L.S.,
sometime Superintendent of the Botanical and Forestry Department, Hongkong;
AND
WILLIAM JAMES TUTCHER, F.L.S.,
Superintendent of the Botanical and Forestry Department, Hongkong.
(Improve this image)
LONDON:
PUBLISHED BY HIS MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE.
To be purchased, either directly or through any Bookseller, from WYMAN and SONS, Ltd., Fetter Lane, E.C.; or OLIVER and BOYD, Tweeddale Court, Edinburgh; or E. PONSONBY, Ltd., 116, Grafton Street, Dublin.
PRINTED BY
DARLING and SON, Ltd., Bacon Street, E.
1912.
Price 4s. 6d.
* Preface ... 2
* Introduction ... 3
** Position and size of area
** Climate
** Geology
** Physical features
** Topography ... 5
** Means of Access ... 5
** History of Botanical Exploration ... 6
** Sources of information regarding the flora ... 7
** Extent of information ... 7
** Character of flora ... 7
** Plan of the flora ... 10
** Summary of desiderata ... 10
* Addenda and Errata -
* Key to the Flora of Kwangtung ... 11
** Flowering Plants. Key to the Natural Orders
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1938, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 85 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Flora of Kwangtung and Hongkong/Addenda and Errata

ADDENDA ET ERRATA.
# Flora Hongkongensis/1/2

§ 2. The Root.
18. Roots ordinarily produce neither buds, leaves, nor flowers. Their branches, called fibres when slender and long, proceed irregularly from any part of their surface.
19. Although roots proceed usually from the base of the stem or stock, they may also be produced from the base of any bud, especially if the bud lie along the ground, or is otherwise placed by nature or art in circumstances favourable for their development, or indeed occasionally from almost any part of the plant. They are then often distinguished as adventitious, but this term is by some appHed to all roots which are not in prolongation of the original radicle.
20. Roots are
fibrous, when they consist chiefly of slender fibres.
tuberous, when either the main root or its branches are thickened into one or more short fleshy or woody masses called tubers (25).
taproots, when the main root descends perpendicularly into the earth, emitting only very small fibrous branches.
22. The stock of a herbaceous perennial, or the lower part of the stem of an annual or perennial, or the lowest branches of a plant, are sometimes undergroimd and assume the appearance of a root. They then take the name of rhizome. The rhizome may always be distinguished from the true root by the presence or production of one or more buds, or leaves, or scales.
# Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* 1990 • Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools (911 F.2d 617),
* 1992 • Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools (503 U.S. 60),
* 1992 • Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools (969 F.2d 1022),
# Franklin to David Hartley

The Private Correspondence of Benjamin Franklin ...: pt.I. Letters on miscellaneous subjects
Philadelphia, Dec. 4, 1789. MY VERY DEAR FRIEND,
I received your favor of August last. Your kind condolences, on the painful state of my health, are very obliging. I am thankful to God, however, that among the numerous ills human life is subject to, one only of any importance is fallen to my lot; and that so late as almost to insure that it can be but of short duration.
The convulsions in France are attended with some disagreeable circumstances; but if by the struggle she obtains and secures for the nation its future liberty, and a good constitution, a few years' enjoyment of those blessings will amply repair all the damages their acquisition may have occasioned. God grant that not only the love of liberty, but a thorough knowledge of the rights of man, may pervade all the nations of the earth, so that a philosopher may set his foot anywhere on its surface, and say, this is my country!-Your wishes for a cordial and perpetual friendship between Britain and her ancient colonies, are manifested continually in every one of your letters to me; something of my disposition on the same subject may appear to you in casting your eye over the enclosed paper. I do not by this opportunity send you any of our gazettes; because the postage from Liverpool would be more than they are worth. I can now only add my best wishes of every kind of felicity for the three amiable Hartleys, to whom I have the honor of being an affectionate friend and most obedient humble servant,
B. FRANKLIN.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Franklin to an Engraver in Paris

Respecting a Print Commemorative of American Independence. Translated from the French.
“Passy, 24 June, 1778.
“Sir: On reading again the prospectus and explanation of your intended print, I find the whole merit of giving freedom to America continues to be ascribed to me, which as I told you in our first conversation, I could by no means approve of, as it would be unjust the number of wise and brave men who, by their arms and counsels, have shared in the enterprise and contributed to its success (as far as it has yet succeeded) at the hazard of their lives and fortunes.
“My proposition to you was, and continues to be, that, instead of naming me in particular in the explanation of the print, it should be said, “The Congress, represented by a Senator in Roman dress, &c.” As it stands, I cannot consent to accept the honor you propose to do me by dedicating the print to me, which, I understand, is in this country considered as an approbation,; and in my own country it would hurt my character and usefulness, if I were to give the least countenance to such a pretension, by recommending or proposing the sale of a print so explained. Upon these considerations, I must request that, if you are determined to proceed in the engraving, you would, in a new prospectus, change the explanation as above proposed, and dedicate the print not to me but to the Congress.”
# Franklin v. Lynch & Simmons

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
233 U.S. 269
Franklin v. Lynch & Simmons
Argued: February 25, 1914. --- Decided: April 6, 1914
Mr. H. A. Ledbetter for plaintiff in error.
Mr. S. T. Bledsoe for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice Lamar delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Franklin v. South Carolina

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
218 U.S. 161
Franklin v. South Carolina
Argued: April 20, 21, 1910. --- Decided: May 31, 1910
Messrs. John Adams, Jacob Moorer, and Charles J. Bonaparte for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. J. Fraser Lyon, D. S. Henderson, C. M. Efird, and B. H. Moss for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Frank Willoughby v. City of Chicago

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
235 U.S. 45
Frank Willoughby v. City of Chicago
Argued: November 6, 1914. --- Decided: November 16, 1914
Messrs. William H. Sexton, Philip J. McKenna, and Howard F. Bishop for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 45-47 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Charles R. Holden for plaintiffs in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 47 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Frank v. Maryland/Concurrence Whittaker

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Whittaker
* Dissenting Opinion Douglas
* Wikipedia article
United States Supreme Court
359 U.S. 360
Frank v. Maryland
Argued: March 5, 1959. --- Decided: May 4, 1959
Mr. Justice WHITTAKER, concurring.
The core of the Fourth Amendment prohibiting unreasonable searches applies to the States through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25, 69 S.Ct. 1359, 93 L.Ed. 1782. I understand the Court's opinion to adhere fully to that principle. And being convinced that the health inspector's request for permission to enter petitioner's premises in midday for the sole purpose of attempting to locate the habitat of disease-carrying rodents known to be somewhere in the immediate area was not a request for permission to make, and that the Code procedures followed did not amount to enforcement of, an unreasonable search within the meaning of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, I join the opinion of the Court.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, with whom The CHIEF JUSTICE, Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice BRENNAN concur, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Frank Leslie's Popular Monthly/Volume 1/Number 4/Why

By Jennie K. Griffith.
You saw her dead in her rosewood case, That was frosted with silver and lined with lace, A pillow of satin, with tassels of silk, And silken fringes whiter than milk, Folds of linen like snowy drift Over the bosom no breath might lift, White hands crossed, and pomp and show, Hiding the heart that was broken below.
Had I but known that the little hands Held fateful dower of gold and lands, I could have worshipped and walked aside, Content in loving, my love to hide— For their palms had touched me, and evermore Life would have brimmed with the ectasy o’er, As the Nile's love-valleys, caressed from sleep, With tropical terrors the memory keep.
As star answers star in the twilight of earth, So a love in her bosom like my love had birth. I kneel to recall it, the love of that girl For the gift was an ominous, sad sea-pearl; All of the wealth of her womanly soul, O! her tenderness all, of her life the whole; For how could they give her to such as I? For my darling is dead, and that is why.
# Frank Young Company v. McNeal-Edwards Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
283 U.S. 398
Frank Young Company v. McNeal-Edwards Company
Argued: and Submitted April 24, 27, 1931. --- Decided: May 18, 1931
Messrs. Walter B. Leach, Jr., and John G. Palfrey, both of Boston, Mass., for petitioner.
Mr. Asa P. French, of Boston, Mass., for respondent.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Frank v. Maryland

Frank v. Maryland, 359 U.S. 360 (1959), was United States Supreme Court interpreting the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Concurring Opinion

    Whittaker

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
359 U.S. 360
Frank v. Maryland
Argued: March 5, 1959. --- Decided: May 4, 1959
See 360 U.S. 914, 79 S.Ct. 1292.
Mr. Benjamin Lipsitz, Baltimore, Md., for appellant.
Mr. James, H. Norris, Jr., Baltimore, Md., and C Ferdinand Sybert, Ellicott City, Mr., for appellee.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Frank Leslie's Popular Monthly/Volume 1/Number 4/Miscellany 6

​ A coquette is a rose, from which every lover plucks a leaf—the thorns are left for her future husband.
# Franco-Russian Alliance

* related portals: Bilateral documents, France, Russia.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
Source: Proceedings and Debates of the First Session of the Sixty-Eighth Congress of the United States of America and Index: Volume LXV–Part 1. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1924.
DRAFT OF MILITARY CONVENTION.
France and Russia, animated by a common desire to preserve the peace, and having no other end in mind than to ward off the necessities of a defensive war, provoked by an attack of the forces of the Triple Alliance against either of them, have agreed upon the following provisions:
1. If France is attacked by Germany, or by Italy supported by Germany, Russia shall employ all its available forces to fight Germany.
2. In case the forces of the Triple Alliance, or of one of the powers which are a party to it, should be mobilized, France and Russia, at the first indication of the event, and without a previous agreement being necessary, shall mobilize all their forces immediately and simultaneously, and shall transport them as near to their frontiers as possible.
3. The available forces which must be employed against Germany shall be: For France, 1,300,000 men; for Russia, from 700,000 to 800,000 men.
These forces shall begin complete action with the greatest dispatch, so that Germany will have to fight at the same time in the east and in the west.
4. The staffs of the armies of the two countries shall constantly plan in concert in order to prepare for and facilitate the execution of the measures set forth above.
They shall communicate to each other, in time of peace, all the information regarding the armies of the Triple Alliance which is in, or shall come into their possession.
The ways and means of corresponding in time of war shall be studied and arranged in advance.
5. France and Russia shall not conclude a separate peace.
6. The present convention shall have the same duration as the Triple Alliance.
7. All the clauses enumerated above shall be kept absolutely secret.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse