OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Evening Songs (1920)/31

XXXI
So many, many things there are To which the keys are lacking;
Deep silence answers all man’s knocks And foils his undertaking.
Thou human heart! There sorrows howl As wolves, by hunger driven, And yet that same heart, oh, my God! To love alone is given.
’Tis capable of so much love That man’s wit may be failing, And he may as the lonely dove In vain roam, ever wailing.
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Burlington (3.)

See also Burlington, Iowa on Wikipedia; Burlington, Iowa, on Wikipedia; Burlington in the 11th Edition; other articles about Burlington at Wikisource; and the disclaimer.
BURLINGTON, a city of the United States, the capital of the county of Des Moines in Iowa, on the right bank of the Mississippi, 207 miles by rail from Chicago. It occupies a natural amphitheatre formed by the limestone bluffs which slope backward from the river. Among the educational institutions the chief place is held by the Business College, founded in 1865, and the Baptist University, which dates from 1854. There are about eight public schools, fifteen churches, and a public library. The commercial activity of the city is very great, and is gradually increasing. Its industrial establishments comprise flour-mills, pork-packing warehouses, foundries, breweries, and soapworks; and the neighbourhood furnishes an abundant supply of coal, building stone, and lime. The city is also the centre of a considerable railway system. Laid out in 1834, it ranked for several years (1837–40) as the capital of Iowa. Population in 1860, 6706; in 1870, 14,933.
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Buzzard

See also Buzzard on Wikipedia; Buzzard in the 11th Edition; and the disclaimer.
BUZZARD, a word derived from the Latin fiutco, through the French Busard, and used in a general sense for a large group of Diurnal Birds-of-prey, which contains, among many others, the species usually known as the Common Buzzard (Buteo vufgaris, Leach), though the English epithet is now-a-days hardly applicable. The name Buzzard, however, belongs quite as rightfully to the birds called in books " Harriers," which form a distinct subfamily of Falconidce under the title Circince, and by it one species, the Moor-Buzzard (Circus cemyinosus), is still known in such places as it inhabits. " Puttock " is also another name used in some parts of the country, but per haps is rather a synonym of the Kite (Milvus ictinus). Though ornithological writers are almost unanimous in dis tinguishing the Buzzards as a group from the Eagles, the grounds usually assigned for their separation are but slight, and the diagnostic character that can be best trusted is probably that in the former the bill is decurved from the base, while in the latter it is for about a third of its length straight. The head, too, in the Buzzards is short and round, while in the Eagles it is elongated. In a general way Buzzards are smaller than Eagles, though there are several exceptions to this statement, and have their plumage more mottled. Furthermore, most if not all of the Buzzards, about which anything of the kind is with certainty known, assume their adult dress at the first moult, while the Eagles take a longer time to reach maturity. The Buzzards are fine-looking birds, but are slow and heavy of flight, so that in the old days of falconry they were regarded with infinite scorn, and hence in common English to call a man " a buzzard " is to denounce him as stupid. Their food consists of small mammals, young birds, reptiles, amphibians, and insects, particularly beetles, and thus they never could havs been very injurious to the gamepreserver, though they have fallen under his ban, if indeed they were not really his friends, but ab the present day they are so scarce that in this country their effect, whatever it may be, is inappreciable. Buzzards are found over the whole world with the exception of the Australian region, and have been split into many genera by systematists. In the British Islands we have two species, one resident (the B. vidgaris already mentioned), and now almost confined to a few wooded districts; the other the Rough-legged Buzzard (Archibuteo lagopw), an irregular winter-visitant, sometimes arriving in large bands from the north of Europe, and readily distinguishable from the former by being feathered down to the toes. The HoneyBuzzard (Pernis apivorus), a summer-visitor from the south, and breeding, or attempting to breed, yearly in the New Forest, does not come into the subfamily Buteonince, but is probably the type of a distinct group, Pernince, of which there are other examples in Africa and Asia. (a. n.)
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Bône

See also Annaba on Wikipedia; Annaba and Hippo Regius at Wikipedia; Bona in the 11th Edition; and the disclaimer.
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Burlington (2.)

See also Burlington, New Jersey on Wikipedia; Burlington, New Jersey, on Wikipedia; Burlington in the |11th Edition; other articles about Burlington at Wikisource; and the disclaimer.
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Byzantine Empire

See also Byzantine Empire on Wikipedia; and the disclaimer.
BYZANTINE EMPIRE. See Greek Empire.
# Executive Order 12296

more info.
Signed by President Ronald Reagan Monday, March 2, 1981
Federal Register page & date: 46 FR 15129, Wednesday, March 4, 1981
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution of the United States of America, and in order to establish, in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. I), an advisory committee on the domestic and international economic policy of the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Establishment.
(a) There is established the President's Economic Policy Advisory Board. The Board shall be composed of members from private life who shall be appointed by the President.
(b) The President shall designate a Chairman from among the members of the Board. The Assistant to the President for Policy Development shall serve as the Secretary to the Board.
Sec. 2. Functions.
(a) The Board shall advise the President with respect to the objectives and conduct of the overall domestic and international economic policy of the United States.
(b) The Board shall work with the Cabinet Council on Economic Affairs (composed of the Secretaries of the Treasury, State, Commerce, Labor, and Transportation, and the United States Trade Representative, and the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget).
(c) In the performance of its advisory duties the Board shall conduct a continuing review and assessment of economic policy, and shall report thereon to the President whenever requested.
Sec. 3. Administration.
(a) The heads of Executive agencies shall, to the extent permitted by law, provide the Board such information with respect to economic policy matters as it may require for the purpose of carrying out its functions. Information supplied to the Board shall, to the extent permitted by law, be kept confidential.
(b) Members of the Board shall serve without any compensation for their work on the Board. However, they shall be entitled to travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by law for persons serving intermittently in the government service (5 U.S.C. 5701-5707).
(c) Any expenses of the Board shall be paid from funds available for the Expenses of the Domestic Policy Staff.
Sec. 4. General.
(a) Notwithstanding any other Executive order, the responsibilities of the President under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, shall be performed by the President, except that, the Administrator of General Services shall, on a reimbursable basis, provide such administrative services as may be required.
(b) The Board shall terminate on December 31, 1982, unless sooner extended.
RONALD REAGAN The White House, March 2, 1981.
[Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 11:33 a.m., March 3, 1981] Note: The text of the Executive order was released by the Office of the Press Secretary on March 3.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 12297

more info.
Signed by President Ronald Reagan Thursday, March 12, 1981
Federal Register page & date: 46 FR 16877, Monday, March 16, 1981
By the authority vested in me as President by the International Coffee Agreement Act of 1980 (Public Law 96-599; 94 Stat. 3491) and Section 301 of Title 3 of the United States Code, and in order to carry out and enforce the International Coffee Agreement 1976, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. The functions vested in the President by Public Law 96-599 (94 Stat. 3491) are delegated to the United States Trade Representative.
Sec. 2. In carrying out the functions delegated to him, the United States Trade Representative shall consult with the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of State. The United States Trade Representative may redelegate some or all of those functions to the head of another Executive agency with the consent of the head of such agency.
RONALD REAGAN The White House, March 12, 1981.
[Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 4:20 p.m., March 12, 1981]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 12298

more info.
Signed by President Ronald Reagan Thursday, March 12, 1981
Federal Register page & date: 46 FR 16879, Monday, March 16, 1981
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution of the United States of America, and in order to eliminate unnecessary and duplicative Federal interference in the responsibilities of the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (see Public Law 96-551 of December 19, 1980), it is hereby ordered that the Tahoe Federal Coordinating Council is terminated and Executive Order No. 12247 of October 15, 1980, is revoked.
RONALD REAGAN The White House, March 12, 1981.
[Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 4:21 p.m., March 12, 1981]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 1229

more info.
Signed by President William H. Taft Friday, July 15, 1910
General Orders, No. 158, War Dept., August 10, 1910
Executive Order No. 1186 of April 8, 1910, reserving for use of the War Department, certain lands on Cordova Bay, Alaska, is hereby modiﬁed by excluding from its provisions the following described tract of land embraced within its boundaries:
    Beginning at the most western angle of the survey of the Nelson townsite, and running thence
    South 44° east with the line of the wharf and dock area 920 feet to a point; thence
    South 46° west in Orca Bay 4140 feet, to a point near the west shore of the bay; thence
    North 44° west 2640 feet to a point of land; thence
    North 46° east 5280 feet to a point; thence
    South 44° east 1720 feet to the boundary of the said townsite;
    Thence with said boundary southwesterly 1140 feet to the point of beginning: Containing 296 acres more or less.
The above described tract is hereby reserved and placed under the control of the Navy Department for use as a naval coaling station and for other purposes of the Navy, reserving to the War Department an unrestricted right of way between the military reservation, created by the Executive Order of April 8, 1910, and the townsite of Nelson authorized to be established by the Act of February 6, 1909.
The White House,
    July 15, 1910.

## Notes

Amends:
* Executive Order 1186, April 8, 1910
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 12290

more info.
See the Notes section for a list of Executive Orders affected by or related to the issuance of this Executive Order.
Signed by President Ronald Reagan Tuesday, February 17, 1981
Federal Register page & date: 46 FR 12943, Thursday, February 19, 1981
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution of the United States of America, and in order to ensure that the Export Administration Act of 1979 is implemented with the minimum regulatory burden, Executive Order No. 12264 of January 15, 1981, entitled "On Federal Policy Regarding the Export of Banned or Significantly Restricted Substances," is hereby revoked.

## Notes
### Revokes

* Executive Order 12264, January 15, 1981
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 12295

more info.
See the Notes section for a list of Executive Orders affected by or related to the issuance of this Executive Order.
Signed by President Ronald Reagan Tuesday, February 24, 1981
Federal Register page & date: 46 FR 14113, Thursday, February 26, 1981
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and statutes of the United States of America, including Section 126a(2) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2155(a)(2)), and having determined that, upon the expiration of the period specified in the first proviso to Section 126a(2) of such Act and extended by Executive Order 12193, failure to continue peaceful nuclear cooperation with the European Atomic Energy Community would be seriously prejudicial to the achievement of United States non-proliferation objectives and would otherwise jeopardize the common defense and security of the United States, and having notified the Congress of this determination, I hereby extend the duration of that period to March 10, 1982.

## Notes

Shortcut: WS:USEO

### Revoked by

* Executive Order 12608, September 9, 1987

### Supersedes

* Executive Order 12193, February 12, 1980;

### Superseded by

* Executive Order 12351, March 9, 1982

### See Related

* Executive Order 12193, February 12, 1980;
* Executive Order 12351, March 9, 1982;
* Executive Order 12409, March 7, 1983;
* Executive Order 12463, February 23, 1984;
* Executive Order 12506, March 4, 1985;
* Executive Order 12554, February 28, 1986;
* Executive Order 12587, March 9, 1987;
* Executive Order 12629, March 9, 1988;
* Executive Order 12670, March 9, 1989;
* Executive Order 12706, March 9, 1990;
* Executive Order 12753, March 8, 1991;
* Executive Order 12791, March 9, 1992;
* Executive Order 12840, March 9, 1993;
* Executive Order 12903, March 9, 1994;
* Executive Order 12955, March 9, 1995
* Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First National Bank in St. Louis v. Missouri ex rel. Barrett

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
263 U.S. 640
First National Bank in St. Louis v. Missouri ex rel. Barrett
Argued: Nov. 21, 22, 1923. --- Decided: Jan 28, 1924
Messrs. Frank H. Sullivan, of St. Louis, Mo., C. A. Severance, of St. Paul, Minn., James C. Jones, of St. Louis, Mo., Wm. J. Hughes, of Washington, D. C., and Lon O. Hocker, of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 641-643 intentionally omitted]
Mr. James M. Beck, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for the United States, amicus curiae.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 644-652 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Merrill E. Otis, of St. Joseph, Mo., Harold R. Small, of St. Louis, Mo., Jesse W. Barrett, of Jefferson City, Mo., Robert C. Morris, of New York City, and Frederick W. Lehmann, Wm. T. Jones, Marion C. Early, and Sam Jeffries, all of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 652-654 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First National Bank of Alken v. J. L. Mott Iron Works

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
258 U.S. 240
First National Bank of Alken v. J. L. Mott Iron Works
Argued: March 10, 1922. --- Decided: March 20, 1922
Messrs. John F. Williams, of Aiken, S.C.., and William S. Nelson, of Columbia, S.C.., for petitioner.
Messrs. P. F. Henderson and D. S. Henderson, both of Aiken, S.C.., for respondent.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First National Bank of Alken v. J. L. Mott Iron Works/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
258 U.S. 240
First National Bank of Alken v. J. L. Mott Iron Works
Argued: March 10, 1922. --- Decided: March 20, 1922
This is a suit against the petitioner upon a written guaranty of payment to the respondent of $2,363.50 for goods sold to the Kaiser Company. The plaintiff (the respondent) had a verdict and judgment and the judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the State. J. L. Mott Iron Works v. Kaiser Co. (S.C..) 103 S. E. 783. The case comes here on the question of the liability of the bank, upon the facts that we shall state.
They are simple. A firm of McGhee and McGhee was building a hospital in Aiken. The firm had contracted with the Kaiser Company for the heating and plumbing, at the price of $7,800, the firm agreeing to pay eighty-five per cent. of the labor and materials furnished each month and the remaining fifteen at the completion of the system. The Kaiser Company assigned this contract to the bank and the firm agreed to make all checks under the contract payable to the bank. This was done as security to the bank for advances the validity of which is not contested. In the course of performance the Kaiser Company ordered the goods concerned from the respondent, but the respondent required security before it would send them. Thereupon the bank in order to enable the company to complete its contract and thereby to repay the advances that the bank had made gave the guaranty in question. Subsequently the bank received $1,105.28 and might have received much more than the amount of its guaranty although in fact it allowed the McGhees to pay checks for $5,468 to the Kaiser Company, with the result that the Kaiser Cimpany still owes it some money. Therefore the bank is in the position of having realized the benefit to acquire which the guaranty was made, and of having realized it out of the proceeds of the goods that it induced the Iron Company to sell.
In such circumstances, whether the contract is valid or not, the contractor is accountable to the contractee, up to the amount of his undertaking, for the proceeds coming to his hands from the contractee upon the inducement of the contract. Citizens' Central National Bank v. Appleton, 216 U.S. 196, 30 Sup. Ct. 364, 54 L. Ed. 443. In this case therefore the plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount for which it has declared, and as the case was fully tried upon the merits, the distinction between a recovery on the guaranty, as having been necessarily incident to the business of banking, and a recovery of the amount received by petitioner on account of the guaranty, becomes purely formal.
Judgment affirmed.
Mr. Justice CLARKE was absent and took no part in the decision.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First National Bank in Plant City v. Dickinson/Dissent Stewart

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Douglas Stewart
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 122
First National Bank in Plant City v. Dickinson
Argued: Oct. 16, 1969. --- Decided: Dec 9, 1969
Mr. Justice STEWART, dissenting.
I wholly agree with the Court that federal law is to be applied in determining whether the activities of a national bank constitute branch banking under the exclusive definition contained in the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. § 36(f). Whether the activities here in question constitute branch banking under that standard seems to me an extremely close question. That being so, I would defer to the determination of the Comptroller of the Currency. He is the official charged with administering these provisions of the Act, and I cannot say his determination was not a reasonable one. See Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16-18, 85 S.Ct. 792, 801-802, 13 L.Ed.2d 616.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First National Bank of Albuquerque v. Albright

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
208 U.S. 548
First National Bank of Albuquerque v. Albright
Argued: and submitted January 22, 1908. --- Decided: February 24, 1908
Mr. Alonzo B. McMillen for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 548-550 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Frank W. Clancy for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 550-551 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse