OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/B/Bishop, Anna

Bishop, Anna, was educated at the Royal Academy of Music, in London. Her first appearance in public was at a concert given by Bochsa, Slily 5, 1839. Grisi, Pauline, Viardot Garcia, Persiani, Rubini, Tamburini, and Lablache, all sang at this concert ; Thalberg and Dohler presided at the piano, and Bochsa at the harp ; still, in spite of this brilliant phalanx of artists, who threatened to eclipse altogether the talent of the new debutante, she obtained the most triumphant success. Soon after she ventured on an artistic tour through the principal countries of Europe, and visited the most noted towns of Denmark, Sweden, Russia, &c., in all of which places she was successful. Her visit and reception in the large cities of the United States will be remembered by the thou-sands who heard and admired her.
# Catholic Magazine and Review/Volume 3
## Volume 3, No. 24 (January, 1833)

* Gregory XVI's Encyclical Letter, by Gregory XVI
* Papal States
* March in India

## Volume 3, No. 25 (February, 1833)

* Account of Foreign Missions, by Narrator

## Volume 3, No. 30 (July, 1833)

THE
CATHOLIC MAGAZINE,
AND
REVIEW.
FROM JANUARY TO AUGUST,
1833.
VOL. III.
"In necessariis unitas, in dubiis libertas, in omnibus Charitas."
St. Aug.
BIRMINGHAM:
PRINTED BY R. P. STONE, 5, CHERRY-STREET.
DUCKWORTH, LIVERPOOL; SCULLY, DUBLIN; LYNCH, MANCHESTER; AND BRIDGEN,
# Catholic Magazine and Review

The Catholic Magazine and Review was a British Roman Catholic periodical published in Birmingham from 1831 to 1833. The periodical replaced the Catholic Miscellany and Monthly Intelligence (1822–30) as the primary Catholic periodical in Britain.

## Volumes

| Year | Volume | Transcription in progress |
| 1831–32 | 1 | |
| 1832 | 2 | |
| 1833 | 3 | (link) |
| 1833 | 4 | (link) |
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Catholic Hymns (1860)/Veni Creator

Veni Creator.
Come, O Creator Spirit blest! And in our souls take up Thy rest; Come, with Thy grace and heav'nly aid, To fill the hearts which Thou hast made
Great Paraclete! to Thee we cry: O highest gift of God most high! O fount of life! O fire of love! And sweet Anointing from above!
Thou in thy sevenfold gifts art known; Thee Finger of God's hannd we own; The promise of the Father thou! Who dost the tounge with pow'r endow.
Kindle our senses from above, And make our hearts o'erflow with love; With patience firm, and virtue high, The weakness of our flesh supply.
Far from us drive the foe we dread, And grant us Thy true peace instead; So shall we not, with Thee for guide, Turn from the path of life aside.
Oh, may Thy grace on us bestow, The Father and the Son to know; And Thee through endless times confess'd Of both th' eternal Spirit blest.
All glory while the ages run Be to the Father and the Son Who rose from death; the same to Thee, O Holy Ghost eternally.
Machined by Robson and Levy, Great New Street, E.C.
# Catholic Magazine and Review/Volume 3/Papal States

PAPAL STATES.
The rebels and traitors in these States still derive encouragement from the French and English ministry. A band of these conspirators has lately been detected at Rome, and their correspondence has fallen into the hands of the Pope's ministers. These miscreants aim at nothing less than forming Central Italy into a republic; and, as one of the means of carrying their plot into execution, have formed themselves into bands, to employ assassination, when necessary to forward their object, or to remove obstacles. Such are the protegés of Mr. Seymour!
The Rev. Dr. Wiseman left London for Rome, on the 2nd ult.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Allegro con brio

Allegro con brio. Quick, with brilliancy.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Allegro ma non presto

Allegro ma non presto. Quick, but not in the extreme.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Allegro molto

Allegro molto, or DI MOLTO. Very quick.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Allegro

Allegro, or ALL'O. (I.) Gay, quick. A. term expressive of the third degree of musical rapidity. Generally applied to lively movements ; but sometimes, in conjunction with another word, placed at the beginning of compositions intended to rouse and stimulate the more violent passions ; as allegro agitato, quick and agitated ; allegro furioso, with rapidity and vehemence. Allegro also denotes one of the six distinctions of time, which succeed each other as follows : grave, adagio, largo, vivace, allegro, and presto.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Allegro assai

Allegro assai. (I.) More quick, or exceedingly quick. ALLEGRO COMMODO. With a convenient degree of quickness.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Allegro con spirito

Allegro con spirito. Quick, with spirit.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Allegro ma grazioso

Allegro ma grazioso. Lively and graceful.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Allegro ma non troppo

Allegro ma non troppo has a similar meaning; lively, but not too spirited.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Allegro con fuoco

Allegro con fuoco. Quick and animated.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Allegro con moto

Allegro con moto. Quick, with more than the usual degree of movement.
# Conscience (Thoreau)

"Conscience is instinct bred in the house"
* "Conscience is instinct bred in the house" in A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers (1849)
* "Conscience" in Poems of Nature (1895)
# Consensus on Gibraltar by the UN Committee of 24 in 1964

The Special Committee on Decolonization issued a consensus on the Gibraltar issue on 16 October 1964. From Repertory of Practice of United Nations Organs. Extracts relating to Article 73 of the Charter of the United Nations. Supplement No 3 (1959 - 1966)
The Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Territories and Peoples, after considering the situation in the Non-Self-Governing Territory of Gibraltar and hearing statements by the representative of the administering Power and the representative of Spain and by petitioners from the Territory and from Spain, affirms that the provisions of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples are fully applicable to the Territory of Gibraltar.
In its consideration of these statements, the Special Committee noted that there was a disagreement, or even a dispute, between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Spain, regarding the status and situation of the Territory of Gibraltar. In the circumstances, the Special Committee invites the United Kingdom and Spain to begin talks without delay, in accordance with the principles of the United Nations Charter, in order to reach a negotiated solution in conformity with the provisions of General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV), giving due account to the opinions expressed by the members of the Committee and bearing in mind the interests of the people of the Territory.
Under its terms of reference laid down in General Assembly resolution 1654 (XVI), the Special Committee requests the United Kingdom and Spain to inform the Special Committee and the General Assembly of the outcome of their negotiations.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Conro v. Crane (94 U.S. 441)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
94 U.S. 441
Conro v. Crane
It must now be considered as settled that appeals do not lie to this court from the decisions of the circuit courts in the exercise of their supervisory jurisdiction under the bankrupt law. In Wiswall et al. v. Campbell et al., 93 U.S. 347, we held that 'a proceeding in bankruptcy, from its commencement to its close upon the final settlement of the estate, is but one suit. The several motions made and acts done in the bankrupt court in the progress of the cause are . . . but parts of the suit in bankruptcy, from which they cannot be separated.' And again: 'Every person submitting himself to the jurisdiction of the bankrupt court in the progress of the cause, for the purpose of having his rights in the estate determined, makes himself a party to the suit, and is bound by what is judicially determined in the legitimate course of the proceeding.' And in Sandusky v. National Bank, 23 Wall. 293, it was decided, that 'any order made in the progress of the cause may be subsequently set aside and vacated, upon proper showing made, provided rights have not become vested under it which will be disturbed by the vacation.'
These principles are decisive of this case. The rights of the parties grow out of a sale made by the court under the authority of sect. 5065, Rev. Stat. The bids were received by the provisional assignee; but the court determined which should be accepted, and gave directions as to the transfer of title. Clearly, then, what was done both as to the first and second sale was in the course of the bankruptcy proceeding, and part of that suit. As such, it was subject to revision in the Circuit Court under its supervisory jurisdiction.
Both Hodgkins and Conro & Carkin submitted themselves to the jurisdiction of the court to the extent that was necessary for the completion of their respective purchases. Conro & Carkin were parties to the proceeding by which the sale to Hodgkins was set aside, and that to them made. Having been in court when the order under which their claim was made, they can properly be brought in to answer a motion to set it aside. Such a motion would not be a new suit, but a new proceeding in the old suit in bankruptcy, and therefore not subject to revision here upon appeal.
This was evidently the understanding of the parties at the time; for the original petition of Hodgkins and Crane was filed in the District Court sitting in bankruptcy, and the petition for review purports, on its face, to be filed under sect. 4986, Rev. Stat., which confers the supervisory jurisdiction.
Appeal dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Auletes

Auletes. One of the names given by the ancient Greeks to flute players.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Aufhaltung

Aufhaltung. (G.) A suspension.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Aufl

Aufl�SUNG. (G.) The resolution of a discord.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Augustin

Augustin. Court musician to the Emperor Maximilian I., 1512.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Augustini, Paolo

Augustini, Paolo. See AGOSTINI.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Augustinus, Aurelius

Augustinus, Aurelius, lived at the end of the fourth century ; he wrote a book on music, which was printed at Basil in 1521.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Auffschnaiter, Benedict Anton

Auffschnaiter, Benedict Anton, chapel-master at Passau, published, between 1695 and 1719, various sacred compositions.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Augmentation

Augmentation. This word is chiefly confined to the language of fuguists. Augmentation is the doubling the value of the notes of the subject of a fugue, or canon ; or, to speak in plain terms, giving the intervals of the subject in notes of twice the original length. When whole notes are used for half notes, half notes for quarter notes, or when in any part of a fugue the subject is taken up in notes of double the value of those in which it commenced, the process is called augmentation. In fugues by augmentation, feet become phrases, phrases become sections, &c.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Aulberus

Aulberus, or ALBERUS. A Lutheran, professor of music at Tubingen. Many of the canticles now in use in the Lutheran church are of his composition.
AULETTA, P., composed an opera, entitled. "Ezio," about the year 1728.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Auffman, J. A

Auffman, J. A., a chapel-master, published three concertos for the organ at Augsburg in 1754.
# Choctaw Oklahoma Gulf Railroad Company v. Harrison

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
235 U.S. 292
Choctaw Oklahoma Gulf Railroad Company v. Harrison
Argued: November 3 and 4, 1914. --- Decided: November 30, 1914
Messrs. J. G. Gamble, C. O. Blake, and M. L. Bell for appellant.
Mr. J. L. Hull and Mr. Charles West, Attorney General of Oklahoma, for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 293-295 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McReynolds delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Choctaw Nation v. Oklahoma

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Douglas

## Dissenting Opinion

    White
United States Supreme Court
397 U.S. 620
Choctaw Nation v. Oklahoma
Argued: March 5, 1970. --- Decided: April 27, 1970
See 398 U.S. 945, 90 S.Ct. 1834.
Lon Kile, Hugo, Okl., and Peyton Ford, Washington, D.C., for petitioners.
G. T. Blackenship, Oklahoma City, Okl., and M. Darwin Kirk, Tulsa, Okl., for respondents.
Louis F. Claiborne, Washington, D.C., for United States, amicus curiae, by special leave of Court.
Mr. Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Choctaw Nation of Indians v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
318 U.S. 423
Choctaw Nation of Indians v. United States
Argued: Dec. 7, 8, 1942. --- Decided: March 8, 1943
Mr. Robert E. Mulroney, of Washington, D.C., for the United states.
Mr. William G. Stigler, of Stigler, Okl., for Choctaw Nation of Indians.
Mr. Melven Cornish, of McAlester, Okl., for Chickasaw Nation of Indians.
Mr. Justice MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# City of New Brunswick v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
276 U.S. 547
City of New Brunswick v. United States
Argued: March 2, 1928. --- Decided: April 9, 1928
Messrs. John W. Davis and Edward L. Patterson, both of New York City, for petitioners.
[Argument of Counsel from Pages 548-550 intentionally omitted]
Mr. W. D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from Page 551 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice SANFORD delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# City of New Orleans v. Barthe

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
376 U.S. 189
City of New Orleans v. Barthe
Alvin J. Liska, for appellants.
Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Ernest N. Morial and A. P. Tureaud, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# City of New Orleans v. Barthe/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
376 U.S. 189
City of New Orleans v. Barthe
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, before judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1), to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the petition is granted. The judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana is affirmed. Turner v. City of Memphis, 369 U.S. 350, 82 S.Ct. 805, 7 L.Ed.2d 762; Watson v. City of Memphis, 373 U.S. 526, 83 S.Ct. 1314, 10 L.Ed.2d 529.
Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice WHITE are of the opinion that this case is not appealable to this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1253 but is appealable to the Court of Appeals under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and that this Court should dismiss the appeal for the Court of Appeals to consider and decide the appeal of this case now properly pending before it. See Bailey v. Patterson, 369 U.S. 31, 82 S.Ct. 549, 7 L.Ed.2d 512.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# City of New Orleans v. Citizens' Bank of Louisiana

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
167 U.S. 371
City of New Orleans v. Citizens' Bank of Louisiana
Samuel L. Gilmore, for appellant.
Wm. A. Maury, for appellee.
Mr. Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# City of New Orleans v. Gaines/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
63 U.S. 141
City of New Orleans v. Gaines
The city of New Orleans instituted proceedings by suit in a city court, pursuant to a statute of Louisiana, for opening two streets in the city, and appropriating the private property requisite for that purpose; and on the tableau of assessment, certain squares of ground were put down as belonging to Mrs. Gaines, and the damages done to owner fixed at $2,363.
The assessment was decreed to Mrs. Gaines by the court where the proceeding was had; and she brought suit on this judgment against the city, in the United States Circuit Court.
The defendant, (the city,) by its answer, admitted the proceeding, and the damages assessed on the property described in the petition; but, in avoidance of the demand, averred that a suit had been brought by one Durell against the city, claiming that he was the true owner of the property through which the streets run, and which the commissioners of assessment had supposed to be owned by Mrs. Gaines, and demanding payment to him of the damages claimed by her; that in the suit so brought by Durell, Mrs. Gaines had been personally cited as a party, at the instance of the city, for the purpose of having the question decided between her and Durell, as to the ownership of the property, and as to their respective claims on the city for the sum awarded; and that in said suit judgment was rendered, determining the question in favor of Durell; and this judgment is pleaded in bar of the present suit.
Various documents were exhibited with the answer, and filed in the Circuit Court, on behalf of the city, including a record of the suit by Durell against the city, and the recovery of the damages for extending the streets; but nothing appears in the record showing that these documents were given in evidence on the trial; nor did the judge before whom the cause was heard make any statement of the facts found by him, as the usual practice is, where the Circuit Court in Louisiana tries issues of fact without the intervention of a jury.
The cause as presented to us simply shows a judgment in Mrs. Gaines's favor, with regular pleadings to warrant it; and beyond this, contains nothing that this court can notice, as a court of error.
It is ordered that the judgment below be affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# City of New Orleans v. Gaines

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
63 U.S. 141
City of New Orleans v. Gaines
THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana.
The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
It was argued by Mr. Benjamin for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. Phillips for the defendant, upon which side there was also a brief filed by Mr. Perin.
Mr. Benjamin, before proceeding to the argument, referred to an agreement of counsel, which had been filed, to make a part of the case.
The record in this case shows that the cause was tried before the judge, under the Louisiana practice, without the intervention of a jury, and, as originally printed, contained no statement of facts which could form a substitute for a verdict, so as to enable this court to correct any error of law that might be apparent in the decision of the lower court. This defect has been supplied by the consent of counsel, since filed, which shows that the case was decided below exclusively on the written deeds and record evidence, copied at length into the transcript filed in this court, and the proper construction of these deeds and records and their legal effect being matters of law, afford the court the necessary basis for the exercise of its revisory powers.
Mr. Phillips said that all he knew about the agreement was, that Perin signed it, understanding the court would grant a certiorari. Mr. Perin says that the agreement was solicited and obtained from him long after the transcript had been filed in this court. But he could not imagine that that paper would be offered as a substitute for bills of exceptions to the reception or rejection of evidence, or to an agreed statement of facts, which should have been reserved or made on the trial of the cause.
Mr. Phillips then proceeded, as Mr. Benjamin had done before, to discuss the merits of the cause; but, as the admission of this agreement was a necessary preliminary to the discussion of the merits, and as this agreement was entirely passed over in the opinion of the court, the reporter refrains from admitting the argument of the merits upon either side.
Mr. Justice CATRON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# City of New Orleans v. Louisiana Const

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
140 U.S. 654
City of New Orleans v. Louisiana Const

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse