# The Geologist/Volume 5/Notes on a New Mass of Meteoric Iron from the Cordillera of Copiapo, Chile

NOTES ON A NEW MASS OF METEORIC IRON FROM THE CORDILLERA OE COPIAPO, CHILE.
By Wm. BOLLAERT, F.R.G.S.,
Cor. Mem. Univ. Chile and Amer. Ethnological Society, etc.
This was found by a muleteer, in June, 1858, when passing the Cordillera from Catamarca to Copiapo, and brought by him to the latter city. He took it to be a rodado, or piece of silver-ore that had been broken from a vein and rounded by being washed with stones, say in the bed of a river; but on its being examined by Dr. David Garcia (a pupil of Domeyko), at Copiapo, he pronounced it to be a mass of meteoric iron.
Meteorite from Copiapo.
Dr. D. Garcia is the manager of the "Transito" maquina or silver amalgamating works, and has this specimen in his possession. Mr. Abbott tells me it is considered a most interesting specimen, being so perfect (not a broken fragment), and whole, ​The mass is covered thickly with a series of shallow pits or depressions, about 1/8 to 1/10 of an inch deep. The spaces between the holes are bright like steel. Its weight is about 12 or 13 lbs.
In consequence of finding a difficulty in fixing the position or positions of the Atacama Meteorite in 1826, I gave Peine, Guanaquero, Chala, and two other spots north of Challa, all in the desert of Atacama; also Miño, to the east of Mani, near the Peruvian and Bolivian boundaries. I tried to get across the desert in 1828, from the coast of the Pacific, in the hope of examining the localities of Guanaquero and Peine, near to one or other of which places I hoped to find the meteoric deposit. I was lost for awhile in the desert of Atacama, and had to return to the coast. Near to Toconao. north-east of Peine, was supposed by Sir W. Parish to be the spot; but in 1853, Dr. Philippi determined Imilac, a few miles south-west of Peine, to be the spot, or one of the spots of the fall of the Atacama Meteorite.
A. very large specimen from Atacama is in the possession of Domeyko, in Santiago, in Chile; some others I have seen, as well as many small fragments which fell at Imilac; as to my small specimen obtained in 1826, when I was in Tarapuca, it may or may not have been collected at Imilac.
The large specimen of the Atacama Meteorite deposited by me in the British Museum, I procured on the west coast in 1854. I have had some doubts as to whether Imilac ought to be given as the locality of its fall. I made this observation in my paper to the Meteorological Society, 1858, as to this specimen; the same will apply to a slice of meteoric stone in the same Museum, and that in the Museum of Practical Geology. The information I had was what I let the British Museum have, that it (and others, one weighing over 50lbs.) were brought to Cobija by a muleteer, from "somewhere to the east in the desert of Atacama, and it was thought there were several similar deposits in the track to Antofogasta."
These specimens have the external mechanical character of the Imilac specimens, but the metallic part is dark, as if much oxidized, and the earthy part is more crystalline.
Nicol, in his 'Mineralogy,' gives an analysis by Rivero of meteoric iron from "Potosi:"—iron, 90⋅24; nickel, 9⋅76 = 100⋅0. Domeyko gives for the Atacama one (Imilac):—iron, 88⋅54; nickel, 8⋅24; cobalt, 1⋅14; silica, 0⋅16. From this difference of composition compared with that of the one from "Potosi," we may say that Imilac was not its place of deposit.
I advert in my paper to the Meteorological Society to three stones found four leagues inland from Playabrava (23° 35′), two round and porous, the other porous, flat, and triangular. I suspect them to be meteoric (for they are said to be of "iron"), and the locality they were found in, although near the latitude of Imilac, is much further to the west. Having disposed of these amygdalo-peridotic varieties, ​that of Imilac, which may have fallen about 1820, I will now refer to Shepard's account in 1850 of three new North American meteorites, with observations upon the general distribution of such bodies, and on the falling of meteorites over a limited zone or area of the earth's surface. He says:—"Out of the fourteen depositions of meteoric matter on the American continent within the last few years, thirteen have taken place between 33° and 44° N.; one only at Maceio, in Brazil, south of the Equator,—a distribution exceedingly unequal." He however concludes "that there is a zone or region over which meteoric falls are more frequent than elsewhere."
Run the eye easterly from the meteoric region of Atacama, on the west coast of South America, for ten degrees of longitude, and now we come upon that extraordinary deposit of solid meteoric iron of Otumpa (about thirteen tons), of which there is so magnificent a specimen in the British Museum. Near Bahia, in Brazil, is another mass of iron of 14,000 lbs.
On Arrowsmith's old map of South America, at a distance of twenty- three geographical miles S.S.W. of the city of Tucuman, appears the word "Meteores;" does this mean that meteoric iron has been found there? Antofogasta is about 2° W.N.W. of the "Meteores," and I have reason to believe that meteoric iron exists about there.
In the map to Wilcocke's 'Buenos Ayres,' at the junction of the Bermejo and Paraguay rivers are the "Montes de Hierro;" monte may mean mountain or forest. This locality is about 2° N.E. of Otumpa, and the iron spoken of here may be meteoric.
In the 'Coleccion de Memorias Cientificas, etc., por M. E. de Rivero y Ustariz' (Brussels, 1857), there are details and analyses of several masses of meteoric iron found in the Cordillera of the Andes (of Bogotá).
My impression is, that when this subject of meteoric zones is worked out, more falls will have to be recorded in South America than given by Shepard.
* ↑ I gave 23° 30′ S., 68° 50′ W. as the position of Dr. Reid's specimens (which are at Ratisbon), and there may be a doubt that they came from Imilac, which is in 23° 49′ S., 69° 14′ W.
* ↑ It is not known when the Otumpa iron fell. It was visited by Celis and Cerviño in 1783. The length of it is 31/4 yards, 2 yards in width, 4 feet 6 inches deep, and contains 93/4 cubic yards. This appears to be independent of smaller pieces. It is called by the natives the Masa de fierro, or mass of iron; the meteorite of the Chaco: of the Chaco Gualamba. It was discovered by people from Santiago del Estero on one of their expeditions to "malear," or hunt for honey and wax. It is in about 27° 43′ S., 2° 40′ W. of Buenos Ayres.