OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume VIII/Pseudo-Clementine Literature/The Clementine Homilies/Homily XIX/Chapter 17

Chapter XVII.—The Devil Has Not Equal Power with God.
And Simon said: “If, then, he exists for ever, is not the fact of the sole government of God thus destroyed, since there is another power, namely, that concerned with matter, which rules along with Him?” And Peter said:  “If they are different in their substances, they are different also in their powers, and the superior rules the inferior. But if they are of the same substance, then they are equal in power, and they are in like manner good or bad. But it is plain that they are not equal in power; for the Creator put matter into that shape of a world into which He willed to put it. Is it then at all possible to maintain that it always existed, being a substance; and is not matter, as it were, the storehouse of God? For it is not possible to maintain that there was a time when God possessed nothing, but He always was the only ruler of it.  Wherefore also He is an eternal sole ruler; and on this account it would justly be said to belong to Him who exists, and rules, and is eternal.” And Simon said: “What then? Did the wicked one make himself? And was God good in such a way, that, knowing he would be the cause of evil, he yet did not destroy him at his origination, when he could have been destroyed, as not yet being perfectly made? For if he came into being suddenly and complete, then on that account he is at war with the Creator, as having come suddenly into being, possessed of equal power with him.”

## Footnotes

* ↑ This passage is supposed by most to be defective, and various words have been suggested to supply the lacuna.
* ↑ Or, “monarch.” But only two letters of the word are in the ms.; the rest is filled in by conjecture.
* ↑ Supplied by conjecture.
* ↑ Three words are struck out of the text of the ms. by all editors, as being a repetition.
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume VIII/Pseudo-Clementine Literature/The Clementine Homilies/Homily XIX/Chapter 11

Chapter XI.—The Application of the Attributes of Man to God.
And Simon, hearing this, said: “You will not force me through shame to remain silent in regard to His substance, and to inquire into His will alone. For it is possible both to think and to speak of His substance. I mean from the good attributes that belong to man. For instance, life and death are attributes of man; but death is not an attribute of God, but life, and eternal life. Furthermore, men may be both evil and good; but God can be only incomparably good. And, not to prolong the subject too much, the better attributes of man are eternal attributes of God.” And Peter said: “Tell me, Simon, is it an attribute of man to beget evil and good, and to do evil and good?” And Simon said: “It is.” And Peter said: “Since you made this assertion, we must assign the better attributes of man to God; and so, while men beget evil and good, God can beget good only; and while men do evil and good, God rejoices only in doing good. Thus, with regard to God, we must either not predicate any of the attributes of man and be silent, or it is reasonable that we should assign the best of the good attributes to Him. And thus He alone is the cause of all good things.”
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume VIII/Pseudo-Clementine Literature/The Clementine Homilies/Homily XIX/Chapter 16

Chapter XVI.—Why the Wicked One is Entrusted with Power.
And Simon said to this: “I have one thing more to say in regard to the wicked one. Assuredly, since God made him out of nothing, he is in this respect wicked, especially since he was able to make him good, by giving him at his creation a nature in no way capable of selecting wickedness.” And Peter said: “The statement that He created him out of nothing, with a power of choice, is like the statement we have made above, that, having made such a constitution as can rejoice in evils, He Himself appears to be the cause of what took place. But since there is one explanation of both statements, we shall show afterwards why it was that He made him rejoice in the destruction of the wicked.” And Simon said: “If he made the angels also voluntary agents, and the wicked one departed from a state of righteousness, why has he been honoured with a post of command? Is it not plain that he who thus honoured him takes pleasure in the wicked, in that he has thus honoured him?” And Peter said: “If God set him by law, when he rebelled, to rule over those who were like him, ordering him to inflict punishment on those who sin, He is not unjust. But if it be the case that He has honoured him even after his revolt, He who honoured him saw beforehand his usefulness; for the honour is temporary, and it is right that the wicked should be ruled by the wicked one, and that sinners should be punished by him.”

## Footnotes

* ↑ The ms. reads: “In this respect he who made him is wicked, who gave existence to what was non-existent.”
* ↑ The Greek is either ungrammatical or corrupt, but the sense is evident.
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume VIII/Pseudo-Clementine Literature/The Clementine Homilies/Homily XIX/Chapter 10

Chapter X.—The Absolute God Entirely Incomprehensible by Man.
“For instance, then, what did you say in the beginning? If the wicked one has been begotten of God, being of the same substance as He, then God is wicked. But when I showed you, from the example which you yourself adduced, that wicked beings come from good, and good from wicked, you did not admit the argument, for you said that the example was a human one. Wherefore I now do not admit that the term ‘being begotten’ can be used with reference to God; for it is characteristic of man, and not of God, to beget. Not only so; but God cannot be good or evil, just or unjust. Nor indeed can He have intelligence, or life, or any of the other attributes which can exist in man; for all these are peculiar to man. And if we must not, in our investigations in regard to God, give Him the good attributes which belong to man, it is not possible for us to have any thought or make any statement in regard to God; but all we can do is to investigate One point alone,—namely, what is His will which He has Himself allowed us to apprehend, in order that, being judged, we might be without excuse in regard to those laws which we have not observed, though we knew them.”

## Footnotes

* ↑ The text is corrupt here. Literally it is, “I do not admit that God had been begotten.”
# Atlantic Coast Line Company v. Southwell

United States Supreme Court
275 U.S. 64
Atlantic Coast Line Company v. Southwell
Argued: Oct. 18, 1927. --- Decided: Oct 31, 1927
Thomas W. Davis, of Wilmington, N. C., for petitioner.
J. Bayard Clark, of Fayetteville, N. C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic Coast Line Company v. Phillips

United States Supreme Court
332 U.S. 168
Atlantic Coast Line Company v. Phillips
Argued: April 9, 1947. --- Decided: June 23, 1947
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia.
Messrs. Carl H. Davis, of Wilmington, N.C., and T.M. Cunningham, of Savannah, Ga., for appellant.
Messrs. Claude Shaw, Jr., and Victor Davidson, both of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic Coast Line Company v. Powe

United States Supreme Court
283 U.S. 401
Atlantic Coast Line Company v. Powe
Argued: May 1, 1931. --- Decided: May 18, 1931
Messrs. Thomas W. Davis, of Wilmington, N. C., and Arthur R. Young, of Charleston, S.C.., for petitioner.
Mr. John P. Grace, of Charleston, S.C.., for respondent.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic Coast Line Company v. Standard Oil Company of Kentucky Standard Oil Company Incorporated in Kentucky

United States Supreme Court
275 U.S. 257
Atlantic Coast Line Company v. Standard Oil Company of Kentucky Standard Oil Company Incorporated in Kentucky
Argued: Oct. 4, 1927. --- Decided: Nov 28, 1927
[Syllabus from pages 257-259 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Thomas W. Davis, of Wilmington, N. C., and Helm Bruce, of Louisville, Ky., for Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
Messrs. Charles G. Middleton, Edward P. Humphrey, and William W. Crawford, all of Louisville, Ky., for Standard Oil Co.
[Argument of Counsel from page 260 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic Coast Line Company v. Temple

United States Supreme Court
285 U.S. 143
Atlantic Coast Line Company v. Temple
Argued: Feb. 17, 18, 1932. --- Decided: March 14, 1932
Messrs. Thomas W. Davis, of Wilmington, N. C., and Douglas McKay, of Columbia, S.C.., for petitioner.
Messrs. John F. Williams, of Aiken, S.C.., and R. E. Whiting, of Columbia, S.C.., for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Astrophel and Other Poems/Au Tombeau de Banville

First published (as Theodoré de Banville) in The Athenæum, April 18th, 1891, p. 505.
AU TOMBEAU DE BANVILLE.
La plus douce des voix qui vibraient sous le ciel Se tait: les rossignols ailés pleurent le frère Qui s'envole au-dessus de l'âpre et sombre terre, Ne lui laissant plus voir que l'être essentiel,
Esprit qui chante et rit, fleur d'une âme sans fiel. L'ombre élyséenne, où la nuit n'est que lumière, Revoit, tout revêtu de splendeur douce et fière, Mélicerte, poète à la bouche de miel.
Dieux exilés, passants célestes de ce monde, Dont on entend parfois dans notre nuit profonde Vibrer la voix, frémir les ailes, vous savez S'il vous aima, s'il vous pleura, lui dont la vie Et le chant rappelaient les vôtres. Recevez L'âme de Mélicerte affranchie et ravie.
Layout 2
# Astrophel and Other Poems/Birthday Ode

First published in The Athenæum, 29th August, 1891, p. 289
BIRTHDAY ODE
August 6, 1891.
I.
cast upon time is light, Days whose sound was a spell shed round from wheeling wings as of doves in flight, Meet in one, that the mounting sun to-day may triumph, and cast out night.
Two years more than the full fourscore lay hallowing hands on a sacred head— Scarce one score of the perfect four uncrowned of fame
as they smiled and fled: Still and soft and alive aloft their sunlight stays though
the suns be dead.
Ere we were or were thought on, ere the love that gave
us to life began, Fame grew strong with his crescent song, to greet the
goal of the race they ran, Song with fame, and the lustrous name with years whose
changes acclaimed the man.
II.
had hailed us men, We too heard and acclaimed the word whose breath was
life upon England then— Life more bright than the breathless light of soundless
noon in a songless glen.
Ah, the joy of the heartstruck boy whose ear was opened
of love to hear! Ah, the bliss of the burning kiss of song and spirit, the
mounting cheer Lit with fire of divine desire and love that knew not if
love were fear!
Fear and love as of heaven above and earth enkindled of
heaven were one; One white flame, that around his name grew keen and
strong as the worldwide sun; Awe made bright with implied delight, as weft with weft
of the rainbow spun.
III.
never have heart to sing: All the grace of the sun-god's face that bids the soul as
a fountain spring Bids the brow that receives it bow, and hail his likeness
on earth as king.
We that knew when the sun's shaft flew beheld and
worshipped, adored and heard: Light rang round it of shining sound, whence all men's
hearts were subdued and stirred: Joy, love, sorrow, the day, the morrow, took life upon
them in one man's word.
Not for him can the years wax dim, nor downward
swerve on a darkening way: Upward wind they, and leave behind such light as
lightens the front of May: Fair as youth and sublime as truth we find the fame
that we hail to-day.
Layout 2
# Astrophel and Other Poems/An Old Saying

AN OLD SAYING.
Many waters cannot quench love, Neither can the floods drown it. Who shall snare or slay the white dove Faith, whose very dreams crown it, Gird it round with grace and peace, deep, Warm, and pure, and soft as sweet sleep? Many waters cannot quench love, Neither can the floods drown it.
Set me as a seal upon thine heart, As a seal upon thine arm. How should we behold the days depart And the nights resign their charm? Love is as the soul: though hate and fear Waste and overthrow, they strike not here. Set me as a seal upon thine heart, As a seal upon thine arm.
Layout 2
# Baltimore Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company v. United States (216 U.S. 617)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
216 U.S. 617
Baltimore Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company v. United States

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baltimore Contractors v. Bodinger/Concurrence Burton

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Burton
* Dissenting Opinion Black
United States Supreme Court
348 U.S. 176
Baltimore Contractors v. Bodinger
Argued: Nov. 9, 1954. --- Decided: Jan 10, 1955
Mr. Justice BURTON concurs in the judgment of the Court.
Mr. Justice BLACK, with whom Mr. Justice DOUGLAS concurs, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baltimore National Bank v. State Tax Commission of Maryland

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
297 U.S. 209
Baltimore National Bank v. State Tax Commission of Maryland
Argued: Jan. 10, 1936. --- Decided: Feb 3, 1936
Messrs. Edwin F. A. Morgan and Gaylord Lee Clark, both of Baltimore, Md., for petitioner.
Messrs. Herbert R. O'Conor and William L. Henderson, both of Baltimore, Md., for respondent.
Mr. Justice CARDOZO delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baltimore Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Baltimore Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Baltimore Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company v. United States (216 U.S. 617)
* Baltimore Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company v. United States (220 U.S. 94)
# Baltimore Contractors v. Bodinger

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Burton

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
348 U.S. 176
Baltimore Contractors v. Bodinger
Argued: Nov. 9, 1954. --- Decided: Jan 10, 1955
Mr.
Morris Rosenberg, Baltimore, Md., for petitioner.
Mr. Charles Wilson, for respondent.
Mr. Justice REED delivered opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Beach v. Viles/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
Array
27 U.S. 675
Beach v. Viles
The present being a suit upon a local statute, giving a particular remedy in the nature of a foreign attachment against garishees, who possess goods, effects or credits of the principal debtor, the decisions which have been made upon the construction of that statute by the state courts, are entitled to great respect; and ought in conformity to the uniform practice of this Court to govern our own decisions. This consideration saves us from the necessity of discussing many of the questions which have been so elaborately argued at the bar. If we were called upon to decide them upon general principles applicable to conveyances, which are assailed as being in fraud of creditors; we should have much difficulty in arriving at a conclusion upon some of the points, and should require further time for deliberation. But we are of opinion, that the case may be finally disposed of upon a single ground, which has received the sanction of the highest state court of Massachusetts. It is this. It appears from the facts, that the proceeds of all the property received by the assignees under this assignment, are insufficient to pay the amount of the just debts and demands due, bona fide, to the assignees. Under such circumstances, the established doctrine in Massachusetts is, that the assignees cannot be holden as trustees of the debtor under this process, so as to be chargeable to the creditor, who is plaintiff in the suit. Even if the assignment were held to be constructively fraudulent, in point of law, they would be entitled to retain for their own bona fide debts; for as to these, they stand upon equal grounds with any other creditors. This is understood to be the clear result of the cases decided in Massachusetts; and it therefore becomes unnecessary to go into the more extensive inquires presented by the arguments at the bar.
Upon this ground we are all of opinion, that the judgment of the circuit court ought to be affirmed with costs.
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the circuit court of the United States for the district of Massachusetts, and was argued by counsel; on consideration whereof, it is considered, ordered and adjudged by this Court, that the judgment of the said circuit court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed with costs.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Beached Keels

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
   Review from the Outlook, December 1906: Here are three good stories, which have more or less close intimacy with the sea and equally so with the life of the seagoing man on shore. All of these three tales, but more especially the first, have quite unusual vigor and originality. The author's chief fault is a somewhat abrupt manner. One feels that he is entirely capable of writing a novel that would make its mark if he should choose to take a larger canvas and paint his picture a little less in single strong strokes and a little more in detail and with atmospheric effect. This is not said, however, in carping criticism of Mr, Rideout's present work, but because its excellence leads one to hope that he may do even better work and on a broader scale.
BEACHED KEELS
BEACHED KEELS
BY
HENRY MILNER RIDEOUT
BOSTON AND NEW YORK
HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY The Riverside Press, Cambridge 1906
COPYRIGHT 1906 BY HENRY MILNER RIDEOUT
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Published October 1906
TO
CHARLES E. SWAN, M. D.
CONTENTS
* I.Blue Peter ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................1
* II.Wild Justice ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................119
* III.Captain Christy ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................221
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1927, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 96 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Beached Keels/Blue Peter

I
BLUE PETER
* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
* Chapter VII
# Be Strong!

* related portals: Hymns.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Be strong! We are not here to play, to dream, to drift; We have hard work to do and loads to lift; Shun not the struggle, face it, ’tis God’s gift. Be strong, be strong, be strong!
Be strong! Say not the days are evil—who’s to blame? And fold the hands and acquiesce—O shame! Stand up, speak out, and bravely, in God’s Name. Be strong, be strong, be strong!
Be strong! It matters not how deep entrenched the wrong, How hard the battle goes, the day, how long; Faint not, fight on! Tomorrow comes the song. Be strong, be strong, be strong!
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Be Thou My Guide

"Be Thou my guide, and I will walk in darkness"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1892), "Be Thou My Guide" in Lippincott's Monthly Magazine (December 1892).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1898), "Be Thou My Guide" in Poems.
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "Be Thou My Guide" in Poems I.

## References

* ↑ View this version at Google Books.
# Beach v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
226 U.S. 243
Beach v. United States
Argued: and submitted October 30, 1912. --- Decided: December 2, 1912

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse