OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Tarzan the Terrible/Advert

EDGAR RICE BURROUGH'S NOVELS
May be had wherever books are sold. Ask for Grossat & Dunlap's list.
TARZAN THE UNTAMED
Tells of Tarzan's return to the life of the ape-man in his search for vengeance on those who took from him his wife and home.
JUNGLE TALES OF TARZAN
Records the many wonderful exploits by which Tarzan proves his right to ape kingship.
A PRINCESS OF MARS
Forty-three million miles from the earth—a succession of the weirdest and most astounding adventures in fiction. John Carter, American, finds himself on the planet Mars, battling for a beautiful woman, with the Green Men of Mars, terrible creatures fifteen feet high, mounted on horses like dragons.
THE GODS OF MARS
Continuing John Carter's adventures on the Planet Mars, in which he does battle against the ferocious "plant men," creatures whose mighty tails swished their victims to instant death, and defies Issus, the terrible Goddess of Death, whom all Mars worships and reveres.
THE WARLORD OF MARS
Old acquaintances, made in the two other stories, reappear, Tars Tarkas, Tardos Mors and others. There is a happy ending to the story in the union of the Warlord, the title conferred upon John Carter, with Dejah Thoris.
THUVIA. MAID OF MARS
The fourth volume of the series. The story centers around the adventures of Carthoris, the son of John Carter and Thuvia, daughter of a Martian Emperor.
GROSSET & DUNLAP. Publishers. NEW YORK
JAMES OLIVER CURWOOD'S STORIES OF ADVENTURE
May be had wherever books are sold. Ask for Grossat & Dunlap's list.
THE RIVER'S END
A story of the Royal Mounted Police.
THE GOLDEN SNARE
Thrilling adventures in the Far Northland.
NOMADS OF THE NORTH
The story of a bear-cub and a dog.
KAZAN
The tale of a "quarter-strain wolf and three-quarters husky" torn between the call of the human and his wild mate.
BAREE, SON OF KAZAN
The story of the son of the blind Grey Wolf and the gallant part he played in the lives of a man and a woman.
THE COURAGE OF CAPTAIN PLUM
The story of the King of Beaver Island, a Mormon colony, and his battle with Captain Plum.
THE DANGER TRAIL
A tale of love, Indian vengeance, and a mystery of the North.
THE HUNTED WOMAN
A tale of a great fight in the "valley of gold" for a woman.
THE FLOWER OF THE NORTH
The story of Fort o' God, where the wild flavor of the wilderness is blended with the courtly atmosphere of France.
THE GRIZZLY KING
The story of Thor, the big grizzly.
ISOBEL
A love story of the Far North.
THE WOLF HUNTERS
A thrilling tale of adventure in the Canadian wilderness.
THE GOLD HUNTERS
The story of adventure in the Hudson Bay wilds.
THE COURAGE OF MARGE O'DOONE
Filled with exciting incidents in the land of strong men and women.
BACK TO GOD'S COUNTRY
A thrilling story of the Far North. The great Photoplay was made from this book.
Grosset & Dunlap, Publishers, New York
# Taylor v. United States (495 U.S. 575)/Concurrence Scalia

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Scalia
* Wikipedia article
United States Supreme Court
495 U.S. 575
Arthur Lajuane Taylor v. The United States
No. 88-7194 Argued: February 28, 1990. --- Decided: May 29, 1990.
Justice SCALIA, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.
I join in the Court's opinion except for Part II, which examines in great detail the statute's legislative history. The examination does not uncover anything useful (i.e., anything that tempts us to alter the meaning we deduce from the text anyway), but that is the usual consequence of these inquiries (and a good thing, too). What is noteworthy, however, is that in this case it is hard to understand what we would have done if we had found anything useful. The Court says, correctly, that the statutory term "burglary" has a "generally accepted contemporary meaning" which must be given effect and which may not be modified by the rule of lenity. Ante, at 596, 598. But if the meaning is so clear that it cannot be constricted by that venerable canon of construction, surely it is not so ambiguous that it can be constricted by the sundry floor statements, witness testimony, and other legislative incunabula that the Court discusses. Is it conceivable that we look to the legislative history only to determine whether it displays, not a less extensive punitive intent than the plain meaning (the domain of the rule of lenity), but a more extensive one? If we found a more extensive one, I assume we would then have to apply the rule of lenity, bringing us back once again to the ordinary meaning of the statute. It seems like a lot of trouble.
I can discern no reason for devoting 10 pages of today's opinion to legislative history, except to show that we have given this case close and careful consideration. We must find some better way of demonstrating our conscientiousness.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Taylor v. United States (493 U.S. 906)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
493 U.S. 906
Carlos A. Taylor v. The United States
No. 88-7503.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Taylor v. United States (493 U.S. 906)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
493 U.S. 906
Carlos A. Taylor v. The United States
No. 88-7503.
Denied.
Opinion of Justice STEVENS respecting the denial of the petition for writ of certiorari.
The question presented by this certiorari petition is whether a district court may disregard the Sentencing Guidelines after finding that a defendant's criminal history score inadequately accounts for past conduct when the court could instead adjust for the inadequacy by increasing the criminal history category one or more levels. In United States v. Lopez, 871 F.2d 513 (1989), a panel of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit characterized this issue as "a significant question concerning the appropriateness of departure from the Guidelines," id., at 514, and answered it in the negative. Two days earlier, however, in petitioner's case a different panel of the same court had given a different answer to that question. Petitioner's panel disposed of his case pursuant to Fifth Circuit Rule 47.5, which permits the Court of Appeals to leave unpublished those "opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law." There is thus a conflict within the Fifth Circuit on both the answer and the importance of the question petitioner presents to us.
Because the petition does not identify any inter-Circuit conflict concerning the question presented, and because the answer provided by the Fifth Circuit's published opinion is widely supported, the Court's denial of certiorari today is entirely consistent with rules governing the management of our certiorari docket. It is unfortunate that the summary disposition of petitioner's case by the Fifth Circuit and this Court may require petitioner to serve an 18-month prison sentence when the Guidelines would specify a range between only 9 and 15 months even if petitioner's criminal history category were increased two full levels. That, however, is the kind of burden that the individual litigant must occasionally bear when efficient management is permitted to displace the careful administration of justice in each case. Perhaps it is not too late for the Court of Appeals to exercise additional care in the administration of justice in this case.

## Notes

1. Other Circuits have reached the conclusion endorsed by the Lopez panel. See United States v. Jackson, 883 F.2d 1007, 1009 (CA11 1989); United States v. Cervantes, 878 F.2d 50, 53 (CA2 1989); United States v. Miller, 874 F.2d 466, 470-471 (CA7 1989). See also United States v. Joan, 883 F.2d 491, 495 (CA6 1989) (incrementally increasing offense level to account for inadequate criminal history when the defendant's criminal history score already placed him in the highest criminal history category).
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Taylor v. United States (44 U.S. 197)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
44 U.S. 197
Taylor v. United States

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Taylor v. United States (286 U.S. 1)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
286 U.S. 1
Taylor v. United States (286 U.S. 1)
Argued: April 11, 12, 1932. --- Decided: May 2, 1932
Mr. R. Palmer Ingram, of Baltimore, Md., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 1-3 intentionally omitted]
The Attorney General and Mr. Thomas D.Thacher, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tales from Tolstoi

TALES FROM TOLSTOI
[Advertisements]
​Page:Tolstoy - Tales from Tolstoi.djvu/6
Tales from Tolstoi
Translated from the Russian with Biography of the Author, by
R. Nisbet Bain
With Photogravure Portrait
LONDON JARROLD & SONS, 10 & 11, WARWICK LANE, E.C. [All Rights Reserved] MDCCCCI
Copyright
London: Jarrold & Sons
Boston: L. C. Page & Company
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Taylor v. McKeithen
## Dissenting Opinion

    Rehnquist
Supreme Court of the United States
407 U.S. 191
Taylor et al. v. McKeithen, Governor of Louisiana, et al.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
No. 71-784. Argued: N/A --- Decided: June 12, 1972
The District Court, in this litigation involving legislative reapportionment, after extensive hearings, approved a plan that departed from historical boundaries as necessary to avoid dilution of racial minority voting strength. The Court of Appeals, without opinion, reversed, adopting Louisiana's plan retaining those boundaries.
Held: Absent an explication of the reasons for its summary reversal of the District Court, the Court of Appeals' judgment is vacated and the case remanded.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
PER CURIAM.
# Taylor v. McElroy

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
360 U.S. 709
Taylor v. McElroy
Argued: April 1, 1959. --- Decided: June 29, 1959
Mr. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., Washington, D.C., for the petitioner.
Solicitor General J. Lee Rankin, Washington, D.C., for respondents.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Taylor v. Mississippi ex rel. Benoit

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
319 U.S. 583
Taylor v. Mississippi ex rel. Benoit
Argued: April 15, 16, 1943. --- Decided: June 14, 1943
Mr. Hayden C. Covington, of Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellants.
Mr. George T. Ethridge, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Mississippi, for appellee.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Taylor v. Morton

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
67 U.S. 481
Taylor v. Morton
This was a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. It was like the case of Curtis vs. Fiedler, (supra), an action of assumpsit against a collector of customs for exacting excessive duties on an importation of hemp from Russia. The questions raised and argued in the Court below were the same as those presented to the Circuit Court of New York, in Curtis vs. Fiedler; but they were decided differently, the verdict and judgment in this case being in favor of the defendant, and it was the plaintiff who took this writ of error. It did not, however, appear from the record that the ruling of the Court, on any question of law, was objected to on the trial, and there was no bill of exceptions which made either the evidence or the instructions of the Court a part of the record.
The same counsel appeared in this cause and in the other, namely:
Mr. Cushing and Mr. Gillet, for the Plaintiff below; and
Mr. Coffey and Mr. Butler, for the Defendant below.
Both cases were argued together. But on the part of this defendant in error the counsel suggested that the writ of error ought to be dismissed, without considering the questions attempted to be raised by the other side.
Mr. Justice CLIFFORD.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tacoma Association of Credit Men v. Washington/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
377 U.S. 532
Tacoma Association of Credit Men v. Washington
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Taffy was a Welshman

"Taffy was a Welshman is an English language nursery rhyme which was popular between the eighteenth and twentieth centuries. It has a Roud Folk Song Index number of 19237." Warning: template has been deprecated.
* "Taffy was a Welshman" in Nursery Rhymes (1860)
* "T" in The Alphabet of Old Friends by Walter Crane (1874)
* "Taffy was a Welshman" in A Book of Nursery Songs and Rhymes by Sabine Baring-Gould (1895)
* "Taffy Was a Welshman" in The Child's Own Music Book by Albert Ernest Wier (1912)
# Tactic

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Tactic."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
"Tactics" redirects here
* "Tactics, by Robert Cholmeley", published in The Case for Women's Suffrage (1907)
* "Tactics," in Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition (1875–1889)
* "Tactics," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
# Taft v. Bowers

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Taft v. Bowers, 278 U.S. 470 (1929), was a case heard before the United States Supreme Court dealing with taxation of a gift of shares of stock under the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The recipient of shares of stock, Elizabeth Taft, argued that she could not be taxed on the amount that the gift increased in value before she received it. She agreed that the IRS could tax the increase in value of the gift that occurred after her receipt of the gift. Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
278 U.S. 470
Taft v. Bowers
Argued: Oct. 9, 1928. --- Decided: Feb 18, 1929
Messrs. Henry W. Taft and Clarence Castimore, both of New York City, for petitioners in No. 16.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 471-475 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Hiram C. Todd, and Roger S. Baldwin, both of New York City, for petitioners in No. 17.
The Attorney General and Mr. E. G. Davis, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from page 477 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tacitus and Other Roman Studies

* related portals: Ancient Rome.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Originally published in French as Tacite (1903). OCLC:1495587
TACITUS
AND OTHER ROMAN STUDIES
BY
GASTON BOISSIER
PROFESSOR OF LATIN ELOQUENCE AT THE COLLEGE DE FRANCE; PERPETUAL SECRETARY OF THE ACADEMIE FRANÇAISE
TRANSLATED BY
W. G. HUTCHISON
LONDON
ARCHIBALD CONSTABLE
AND COMPANY, LTD.
1906
Edinburgh, T. and A. Constable, Printers to His Majesty
CONTENTS
| TACITUS | TACITUS | PAGE |
| CHAP. I. | HOW TACITUS BECAME A HISTORIAN | 1 |
| II. | THE CONCEPTION OF HISTORY IN TACITUS | 43 |
| III. | THE JUDGMENT OF TACITUS ON THE CÆSARS | 87 |
| IV. | THE POLITICAL OPINIONS OF TACITUS | 122 |
| THE SCHOOLS OF DECLAMATION AT ROME | THE SCHOOLS OF DECLAMATION AT ROME | 163 |
| THE ROMAN JOURNAL | THE ROMAN JOURNAL | 195 |
| THE POET MARTIAL | THE POET MARTIAL | 233 |
PREFACE
The Romans had a very just appreciation of the merit of their historians. Quintilian, in his rapid survey of the writers of his country, asserts that there are three literary forms in which they bear comparison with those of Greece. 'Satire,' he says, 'is wholly ours. . . . In the elegy we are their rivals. . . . Our historians take no lower place than theirs.'
Let us note that when Quintilian thus expressed himself he was unacquainted with the works of Tacitus, that is to say of the greatest man among them. In his time it was a question for dispute whether Sallust or Livy were preeminent. The classicists preferred Livy, who delighted them by the pure and abundant flow of his eloquence. The new school was fascinated by the vigorous strokes and the profundity of Sallust, and Martial, who liked to embody in well-turned verses the opinions of his time, had no hesitation in saying:
Crispus romana primus in historia.
To-day we rank Tacitus above the two others; he even enjoys the privilege, in the decline of classical studies, of preserving all his popularity. Not only is he read still, though the ancient authors have scarce any longer readers, but to speak of him is almost a claim to be read. I have no pretension in these few pages to exhaust all that could ​be said of him. I shall emphasise certain questions which might have been much discussed, both in Germany and amongst ourselves, with respect to the manner in which he conceived of history and on his way of judging events and men.
I crave permission to add to this work on Tacitus some studies published on various occasions, which may serve for its elucidation.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Tacoma Association of Credit Men v. Washington

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
377 U.S. 532
Tacoma Association of Credit Men v. Washington
Ofell H. Johnson, for appellant.
John J. O'Connell, Atty. Gen. of Washington, and James A. Furber and Henry W. Wager, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# The American Cyclopædia (1879)/Beck, Theodoric Romeyn

Edition of 1879. See also Theodric Romeyn Beck, John Brodhead Beck and Lewis Caleb Beck on Wikipedia; and the disclaimer.
BECK. I. Theodoric Romeyn, an American physician, born in Schenectady, N. Y., Aug. 11, 1791, died in Utica, N. Y., Nov. 19, 1855. He was a graduate of Union college (1807), began his medical career in Albany, prepared in 1813 a systematic report on American minerals, became in 1815 professor of the institutes of medicine and lecturer on medical jurisprudence in the college of physicians and surgeons of western New York, and was principal of the Albany academy from 1817 to 1848. In addition he was professor in the Fairfield medical college, 1826-'40, and in the Albany medical college, 1840-'54. He was president of the New York State medical society in 1829, founder and for some time president of the Albany institute, and one of the managers of the New York state lunatic asylum from the time of its foundation, and its president in 1854. His statistical publications relating to the deaf and dumb had a powerful effect in influencing the state legislature to provide for their education. He edited the “American Journal of Insanity” (1849-'53), wrote extensively for scientific periodicals, and published with his brother a celebrated work on the “Elements of Medical Jurisprudence” (1823; 7th ed., with notes by Dr. Dunlap and Dr. Darwell, London, 1842; 10th ed., 2 vols., Albany, 1850). II. John Brodhead, an American physician, brother of the preceding, born in Schenectady, Sept. 18, 1794, died in Rhinebeck, N. Y., April 9, 1851. He was a graduate of Columbia college (1813), practised in New York, and was in 1822 one of the founders and for seven years the chief editor of the “New York Medical and Surgical Journal.” In 1826 he became professor of materia medica and botany in the college of physicians and surgeons, and afterward exchanged the chair of botany for that of medical jurisprudence, which, together with that of materia medica, he filled till his death. He coöperated with his brother in his “Elements of Medical Jurisprudence,” and published “Medical Essays” (1843), “Infant Therapeutics” (1849), and “Historical Sketch of the State of Medicine in the Colonies” (1850). III. Lewis C., an American naturalist, brother of the preceding, born in Schenectady, N. Y., Oct. 4, 1798, died in Albany, April 21, 1853. He was a graduate of Union college (1817), and professor successively of botany in the Rensselaer institute at Troy (1824-'9), of
botany and chemistry in the Vermont academy of medicine, of chemistry and natural history in Rutgers college, and of chemistry in the Albany medical college. In 1837 he was appointed mineralogist in the geological survey of New York. He published works on botany, chemistry, adulterations, the “Mineralogy of New York” (4to, 1842), &c.
# The American Cyclopædia (1879)/Becker

Edition of 1879. See also Becker County, Minnesota on Wikipedia; and the disclaimer.
BECKER, a N. W. county of Minnesota; area, 1,400 sq. m.; pop. in 1870, 308. The Red river of the North has its source in Elbow lake, in the N. E. part of the county. Detroit lake, in the S. W. part, empties into the Red river, and White Earth lake, in the N. part, into Wild Rice river. Buffalo river, also a branch of the Red, drains the W. part, while the S. E. corner is watered by affluents of the Crow Wing river.
# The American Cyclopædia (1879)/Becker, Karl Ferdinand

Edition of 1879. See also Karl Becker (philologist) on Wikipedia; and the disclaimer.
BECKER, Karl Ferdinand, a German philologist, born at Liser, near Treves, April 14, 1775, died at Offenbach, Sept. 5, 1849. He was educated at Hildesheim, taught there from 1794 to 1799, subsequently studied and practised medicine, and was a surgeon in the army. In 1823 he established a school at Offenbach. In his writings on comparative philology he followed logical and philosophical principles, in opposition to the school of philologists who base their investigations chiefly upon historical and ethnological development. His grammars
and manuals of the German language passed through many editions.