OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Virginian Railway Company v. Mullens

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
271 U.S. 220
Virginian Railway Company v. Mullens
Argued: Jan. 21, 22, 1926. --- Decided: May 24, 1926
Messrs. H. T. Hall, of Roanoke, Va., W. H. T. Loyall, of Norfolk, Va., G. A. Wingfield, of Roanoke, Va., and E. W. Knight, of Charleston, W. Va. (Messrs. M. P. Howard, of Pineville, W. Va., Williams, Loyall & Tunstall, of Norfolk, Va., and Martin & Wingfield, of Roanoke, Va., of counsel), for petitioner.
Mr. J. Albert Toler, of Mullens, W. Va., for respondent.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Virginian Railway Company v. System Federation No. 40

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
300 U.S. 515
Virginian Railway Company v. System Federation No. 40
Argued: Feb. 8, 9, 1937. --- Decided: March 29, 1937
[Syllabus from pages 515-517 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. James Piper, of Baltimore, Md., H. T. Hall, of Roanoke, Va., and John C. Donnally, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 518-524 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Frank L. Mulholland, for Toledo, Ohio, and S. M. Brandt, of Norfolk, Va., for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from Pages 524-533 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Stanley F. Reed, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for the United States as amicus curiae, by special leave of Court.
[Argument of Counsel from Pages 534-537 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Virginibus Puerisque and Other Papers

VIRGINIBUS PUERISQUE
AND OTHER PAPERS
VIRGINIBUS PUERISQUE
AND OTHER PAPERS
BY
ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON
LONDON C. KEGAN PAUL & CO., 1, PATERNOSTER SQUARE 1881
The rights of translation and of reproduction are reserved.
​My dear William Ernest Henley,
We are all busy in this world building Towers of Babel; and the child of our imaginations is always a changeling when it comes from nurse. This is not only true in the greatest, as of wars and folios, but in the least also, like the trifling volume in your hand. Thus I began to write these papers with a definite end: I was to be the Advocatus, not I hope Diaboli, but Juventutis; I was to state temperately the beliefs of youth as opposed to the contentions of age; to go over all the field where the two differ, and produce at last a little volume of special pleadings which I might call, without misnomer, Life at Twenty-five. But times kept changing, and I shared in the change. I clung hard to that entrancing age; but, with the best will, no man can be twenty-five for ever. The old, ruddy convictions deserted me, and, along with them, the style that fits their presentation and defence. I saw, and indeed my friends informed me, that the game was up. A good part of the volume would answer to the long-projected title; but the shadows of the prison-house are on the rest.
​It is good to have been young in youth and, as years go on, to grow older. Many are already old before they are through their teens; but to travel deliberately through one's ages is to get the heart out of a liberal education. Times change, opinions vary to their opposite, and still this world appears a brave gymnasium, full of sea-bathing, and horse exercise, and bracing, manly virtues; and what can be more encouraging than to find the friend who was welcome at one age, still welcome at another? Our affections and beliefs are wiser than we; the best that is in us is better than we can understand; for it is grounded beyond experience, and guides us, blindfold but safe, from one age on to another.
These papers are like milestones on the wayside of my life; and as I look back in memory, there is hardly a stage of that distance but I see you present with advice, reproof, or praise. Meanwhile, many things have changed, you and I among the rest; but I hope that our sympathy, founded on the love of our art, and nourished by mutual assistance, shall survive these little revolutions undiminished, and, with God's help, unite us to the end.
R. L. S.
CONTENTS
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Virginibus Puerisque and Other Papers/Advert

By the same Author.
"Mr. Stevenson's writing is as elegant as ever, but it is more natural. . . . It is remarkable that on so slight a thread so many jewels of thought and fancy can be hung."—Saturday Review.
"The new volume of travel with which he now favours us has the self-same happy ring, the self-same light and graceful touch."—Grant Allen, in the Fortnightly Review.
"Contains passages of feeling, humour, insight, description, expressed with fluency and finish in the best English prose."—Athenæum.
"Robert Louis Stevenson is, in his own way, one of the most perfect writers living—one of the few who may yet do something that will become classical. . . . Full of delicate entertainment."—P. G. Hamerton, in the Academy.
"The narrator will delight any reader who can enter sufficiently into the author's mood to enjoy the half-humorous, half-pathetic moralizings which give a charm to these pages."—Spectator.
# United States v. Rider (261 U.S. 363)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
261 U.S. 363
United States v. Rider (261 U.S. 363)
Argued: Feb. 23, 1923. --- Decided: March 19, 1923
The Attorney General and Mr. James A. Fowler, of Knoxville, Tenn., for the United States.
Mr. Henry W. Driscoll, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Richard

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
33 U.S. 470
United States v. Richard
APPEAL from the superior court of East Florida.
The case was argued by Mr Call, for the United States; and by Mr White, for the appellee.
Mr Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Rider

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Rider."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Rider (163 U.S. 132)
* United States v. Rider (261 U.S. 363)
See also Rider v. United States.
# Venice Preserv'd

This transcription is of the first edition, published in 1682.
Venice Preserv'd,
OR,
A Plot Discover'd.
A
TRAGEDY.
As it is Acted at the
DUKE'S THEATRE.
Written by THOMAS OTWAY.
LONDON, Printed for Jos. Hindmarsh at the Sign of the Black Bull, over against the Royal Exchange in Cornhill. 1682.
* Epistle Dedicatory
* Prologue
* Epilogue
* Personæ Dramatis
* Act I
* Act II
* Act III
* Act IV
* Act V
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Veni, Veni, Emmanuel

Christian hymn for Advent and Christmas. The hymn is a metrical arrangement of the O Antiphons, a series of antiphons used in the Vespers liturgy during the last few days of Advent.
The earliest known edition of the text is in the seventh edition of Psalteriolum Cantionum Catholicarum (1710), though some authors have claimed it to date to the 12th century. The melody most commonly associated with it (at least in the English-speaking world) was composed by Thomas Helmore and was first published in The Hymnal Noted (1851) alongside John Mason Neale's translation "Draw nigh, draw nigh Emmanuel".
The most popular English translation of this hymn, by far, is "O Come, O Come, Emmanuel" by John Mason Neale, first published in Hymns Ancient and Modern (1861).
English-language translations of Veni, Veni, Emmanuel include:
* "Draw nigh, draw nigh Emmanuel" by John Mason Neale (1851)
* "O Come, O Come, Emmanuel" by John Mason Neale (1861)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Veni Creator

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Veni Creator."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Veni Creator, hymn by Rabanus Maurus, 9th century
* Veni Creator, poem by Alice Meynell, 1921
# Veni Creator Spiritus (Maurus)

Veni Creator Spiritus ("Come Creator Spirit") is a hymn believed to have been written by Rabanus Maurus in the 9th century.
English-language translations of Veni Creator Spiritus include:
* Come, Holy Ghost, Creator Blest by Richard Mant
* Come, Holy Ghost, our souls inspire, by John Cosin
* Come, O Creator Spirit blest, by Edward Caswall
* Come, O Creator Spirit, come, by Robert Bridges
* Creator Spirit, by whose aid, by John Dryden
* Come, Holy Ghost, Creator, come, anonymous translation
* "Veni Creator Spiritus" in The Little Book of the Most Holy Child Jesus by John Priestly Warmoll, 1876.

## See also:

* Veni Creator Spiritus in The seven great hymns of the mediaeval church (1902)
* Veni Creator Spiritus in Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)
# Veni Sancte Spiritus

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Veni Sancte Spiritus."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Veni Sancte Spiritus, a 13th-Century hymn
* "Veni Sancte Spiritus", a prayer, possibly dating to the 11th century
# Venez divin Messie

* related portals: Hymns, Christmas.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
English-language translations of Venez divin Messie include:
* "O Come, Divine Messiah" by Mary of St. Philip
* "Come, O Divine Messiah" in The Army and Navy Hymnal by H. Augustine Smith
# Venice

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Venice."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, travel guide, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* The Venice (69 U.S. 258), US Supreme Court case
* Venice, a poem by Herbert Asquith
* Venice, a poem by S. Foster Damon
* Venice, a poem by Mihai Eminescu, translated by Petre Grimm
* Venice, a travel guide by Augustus John Cuthbert Hare
* Venice, a sonnet by Giovanni della Casa, translated by Felicia Hemans
* Venice, by Laurence Hutton
* Venice, a poem by Letitia Elizabeth Landon 'Morn on the Adriatic, every wave'
* Venice, a poem by Letitia Elizabeth Landon 'Aye, the Ocean has bright daughters'
* "Venice," in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
# Veni Creator Spiritus

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Veni Creator Spiritus."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
Veni, creátor Spíritus,
Rabanus Maurus
* Veni Creator Spiritus by Rabanus Maurus, 9th century
* Veni Creator Spiritus by John Cowper Powys, 1917
# Veni Sancte Spiritus (hymn)

* related portals: Hymns.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, quotes, Wikidata item.
   Veni Sancte Spiritus, sometimes called the "Golden Sequence," is a sequence prescribed in the Roman Liturgy for the Masses of Pentecost and its octave, exclusive of the following Sunday. It is usually attributed to either the thirteenth-century Pope Innocent III or to the Archbishop of Canterbury Stephen Langton, although it has been attributed to others as well
   —Warning: template has been deprecated.
English-language translations of Veni Sancte Spiritus include:
* Veni Sancte Spiritus by Athanasius Diedrich Wackerbarth (1843).
* Holy Spirit, Lord of light by Edward Caswall (1848).
* Veni Sancte Spiritus by Catherine Winkworth (1875).

## See also

* "Veni Sancte Spiritus Et Emitte Coelitus," in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
* "Veni Sancte Spiritus" in The Seven Great Hymns of the Mediaeval Church by Charles Cooper Nott (1902).
# Venice Preserv'd/Act I

VENICE PRESERV'D,
OR
A Plot Discover'd.
Act I. Scene I.
# Vyasavali

CONTENTS
(Telugu characters)
| Introduction | 108 |
| How to approximate written and spoken Telugu | 120 |
| Freedom to use the current language | 125 |
| Who can fix a living language | 131 |
| Popular literature i | 142 |
| Popular„ literature„ ii | 155 |
| Popular„ literature„ iii | 163 |
# Vulgate

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Vulgate."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* The Vulgate, a 4th century Latin translation of the Bible—for versions, see Bible
* "Vulgate", an article in 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica
* "Vulgate, The", an article in The New Student's Reference Work
# United States v. Bethlehem Steel Company (389 U.S. 575)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 575
United States v. Bethlehem Steel Company (389 U.S. 575)
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit are vacated and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings in light of this Court's decision in Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United States, 389 U.S. 191, 88 S.Ct. 379, 19 L.Ed.2d 407.
Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
315 U.S. 289
United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation
Argued: Dec. 9, 1941. --- Decided: Feb 16, 1942
[Syllabus from pages 289-291 intentionally omitted]
Merrs. Francis Biddle, Atty. Gen., and Charles Fahy, Sol. Gan., for petitioners.
Mr. Frederick H. Wood, of New York City, for respondents.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Beuttas

United States Supreme Court
324 U.S. 768
United States v. Beuttas
Argued: March 1, 1945. --- Decided: April 23, 1945
Mr. Ralph F. Fuchs, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. P. J. J. Nicolaides, of Washington, D.C., for respondents.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, 261 U.S. 204 (1923), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that Bhagat Singh Thind, who was a Punjabi Sikh, settled in Oregon, could not be a naturalized citizen of the United States, because he was not a "white person" in the sense intended in the relevant 1790 statute governing naturalization. Although Thind argued that as an Indian he belonged to the Aryan and therefore the Caucasian race, the Court found that "the Aryan theory, as a racial basis, seems to be discredited by most, if not all, modern writers on the subject of ethnology," and noted that "the Caucasic division of the human family is 'in point of fact the most debatable field in the whole range of anthropological studies.'" The Court found that the authors of the 1790 statute probably ascribed to "the Adamite theory of creation" and understood "white people" in its popular, and not scientific, sense. Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
261 U.S. 204
United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind
Argued: Jan. 11, 12, 1923. --- Decided: Feb 19, 1923
Mr. Solicitor General Beck, of Washington, D. C., for the United states.
Mr. Will R. King, of Washington, D. C., for Thind.
[Argument of Counsel from page 205-206 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Biggs

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
211 U.S. 507
United States v. Biggs
Argued: December 16, 17, 1908. --- Decided: January 4, 1909
Solicitor General Hoyt, Attorney General Bonaparte, and Mr. Edwin W. Lawrence for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 508-510 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Clyde C. Dawson and Charles J. Hughes, Jr., for defendants in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 511-513 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walks in the Black Country and its Green Border-Land/Contents

CONTENTS.
CHAPTER I.
CHAPTER II.
CHAPTER III.
CHAPTER IV.
CHAPTER V.
CHAPTER VI.
CHAPTER VII.
CHAPTER VIII.
CHAPTER IX.
CHAPTER X.
CHAPTER XI.
CHAPTER XII.
CHAPTER XIII.
CHAPTER XIV.
CHAPTER XV.
# Walks in the Black Country and its Green Border-Land/Preface

PREFACE.
A FEW words may be expected from the author of this volume to explain the reasons of its appearance. A very few will suffice for this object. It is a part of the duty of American Consuls and Consular Agents abroad to prefix or append to their reports of the trade of their respective districts with the United States other facts bearing upon the productive capacities, industrial character, and natural resources of the communities embraced in their consulates. These annual reports are published by the Department of State at Washington, and constitute a volume of considerable value and interest. In preparing such a report for the Birmingham Consulate, including the Black Country, the author found that it would be impossible to give any approximate idea of the resources and industries of that remarkable district in the space of a few pages ​appended to the statistics of its exportations to the United States. On closing his brief abstract at the end of 1866, he therefore proposed and promised to present to the Department at Washington, in the course of the ensuing year, a fuller account of the section included in his consulate. This volume, entitled "Walks in the Black Country and its Green Border-Land," is the fulfilment of that promise and undertaking. In order to make it more readable to those not immediately interested in the elements and industries of Manufactures, Trade, and Commerce, he has introduced somewhat lengthened and detailed notices of natural sceneries, public buildings and characters, and historical facts, incidents, and associations belonging to the section. With such abundant and varied material, several volumes of equal size might have been filled; but the author hopes this will serve to give distant readers a bird's-eye view of the district of which it treats, and, perhaps, present a few points and aspects of interest which some persons residing within it may have overlooked.
Birmingham, April 15, 1868.
# United States v. Lindsay

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Reed
United States Supreme Court
346 U.S. 568
United States v. Lindsay
Argued: Dec. 1, 2, 1953. ---
Mr. Paul A. Sweeney, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Edward C. Park, Boston, Mass., for respondents.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Line Materials Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Burton
United States Supreme Court
333 U.S. 287
United States v. Line Materials Company
Argued: Nov. 12, 13, 1947. --- Decided: March 8, 1948
Mr. Frederick Bernays Wiener, of Providence, R.I., for appellant.
Mr. John Lord O'Brian, of Washington, D.C., for appellees.
Mr. Albert R. Connelly, of New York City, for appellee, Westinghouse Electric Corporation.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Linn

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Linn."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Linn (40 U.S. 290)
* United States v. Linn (42 U.S. 104)
# United States v. Limehouse

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
285 U.S. 424
United States v. Limehouse
Argued: Feb. 25, 26, 1932. --- Decided: April 11, 1932
The Attorney General and Mr. Claude R. Branch, of Providence, R. I., for the United States.
Messrs. Wm. C. Wolfe, of Orangeburg, S.C.., and John P. Grace, of Charleston, S.C.., for appellee.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse