OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Maryland v. Buie/Concurrence Kennedy

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Stevens Kennedy
* Dissenting Opinion Brennan
* Wikipedia article
Justice KENNEDY, concurring.
The Court adopts the prudent course of explaining the general rule and permitting the state court to apply it in the first instance. The concurrence by Justice Stevens, however, makes the gratuitous observation that the State has a formidable task on remand. My view is quite to the contrary. Based on my present understanding of the record, I should think the officers' conduct here was in full accord with standard police safety procedure, and that the officers would have been remiss if they had not taken these precautions. This comment is necessary, lest by acquiescence the impression be left that Justice Stevens' views can be interpreted as authoritative guidance for application of our ruling to the facts of the case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Maryland v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Maryland v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Maryland v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company (44 U.S. 534), ( 11 L.Ed. 714 ), ( 3 How. 534 )
* Maryland v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company (89 U.S. 105), ( 22 L.Ed. 713 ), ( 22 How. 105 )
See also Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Maryland.
# Matton Steamboat Company v. Murphy Lake Tankers Corporation

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
319 U.S. 412
Matton Steamboat Company v. Murphy Lake Tankers Corporation
Argued: May 5, 1943. --- Decided: June 1, 1943
Mr. Frank C. Mason, of New York City, for appellants Matton Steamboat Co., Inc., and Conners Marine Co., Inc.
Mr. Francis S. Bensel, of New York City, for appellant Lake Tankers Corporation.
Mr. Orrin G. Judd, of New York City, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mattox v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Mattox v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Mattox v. United States (146 U.S. 140)
* Mattox v. United States (156 U.S. 237)
# Mattox v. Sacks

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
369 U.S. 656
Mattox v. Sacks
Argued: May 14, 1962. ---
Pearl Raymond Mattox, pro se.
Mark McElroy, Atty. Gen. of Ohio, and Aubrey A. Wendt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mattox v. Sacks/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
369 U.S. 656
Mattox v. Sacks
Argued: May 14, 1962. ---
Petitioner was convicted in an Ohio state court of assault with intent to kill and of cutting with intent to kill, wound or main the same person. He immediately sought a writ of habeas corpus which was denied on the ground that appeal was the proper remedy. He then attempted to appeal but this was denied as out of time and the Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed this denial. He unsuccessfully sought habeas corpus twice more, the latest petition being to the Supreme Court of Ohio and alleging, among other matters, a denial of counsel at his trial and a deprivation of rights guaranteed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court of Ohio denied the petition, holding that habeas corpus was not a substitute for appeal and was not available to remedy the defects alleged by petitioner. Petitioner now seeks our writ of certiorari to review that ruling.
The petition for certiorari must be denied. The decision below and the several prior actions in the Ohio courts indicate that petitioner is without a state remedy to challenge his conviction upon the federal constitutional grounds asserted. In these circumstances, Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. 200, 208, 70 S.Ct. 587, 592, 94 L.Ed. 761, is not applicable and a prisoner may, without first seeking certiorari here, file his application for habeas corpus in the appropriate United States District Court. 28 U.S.C. § 2254, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. Massey v. Moore, 348 U.S. 105, 75 S.Ct. 145, 99 L.Ed. 135; Frisbie v. Collins, 342 U.S. 519, 72 S.Ct. 509, 96 L.Ed. 541. Petitioner's allegations, if true, would present serious questions under the Fourteenth Amendment, and those allegations would therefore entitle him to a hearing. Massey v. Moore, supra; Pennsylvania ex rel. Herman v. Claudy, 350 U.S. 116, 76 S.Ct. 223, 100 L.Ed. 126.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 135/Issue 1739/September

* SEPTEMBER.
* There sounds a rustling in the standing corn;
* There hangs a bright-cheeked apple on the bough;
* And later lingers now the tardy morn,
* And evening shadows gather sooner now.
* One crimson branch flames 'mid the maple wood;
* One red leaf hides amid the woodbine's green;
* And clean-raked fields lie bare, where lately stood
* The tawny grain amid the summer scene.
* Blue gentians show 'mid meadow grasses sear,
* And, from the stubble, shrill the crickets sing:
* A requiescat o'er the falling year
* All sounds seem sadly chorusing.
* New York Evening Mail.
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 135/Issue 1740/A Contrast

* A CONTRAST.
* Blow fresh, ye winds, blow fresh and strong,
* Sing loud, dear lark, your sweetest song, —
* In the deep blue, sing loud and long.
* Shine brightly, sun, in summer might,
* Flood all the fields with golden light,
* And drive far off the envious night.
* To-day there is no room for care,
* A heavenly beauty fills the air, —
* Fair is God’s world, yea, very fair!
* Upon our peaceful English shore,
* Heaven's love is resting evermore,
* And wealth of Heaven a boundless store.
* From east to west, from south to north,
* No voice of discord echoes forth, —
* We hear no muttering sounds of wrath;
* But careless song of youth and maid,
* Mirth-making in the woodland glade,
* At leisure in September's shade,
* With music of the bird and bee,
* And hum of civic industry,
* Are borne o'er England's guardian sea.
* Deep is our peace, while from afar
* Roll on the murd'rous wheels of War,
* And Famine's Juggernautine car.
* Far off, our brethren cry to Heaven,
* By lust, and hate, and hunger driven,
* Scathed as the oak by lightning riven.
* Here, bask we in serenest light,
* There, horrors crowd from morn to night
* And love is lust, and might is right.
* Spectator.John Dennis
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 135/Issue 1740

LITTELL'S LIVING AGE.
| Fifth Series, Volume XX. | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | No. 1740. — October 20, 1877. | $\scriptstyle {\left\{{\begin{matrix}\ \end{matrix}}\right.}$ | From Beginning Vol. CXXXV. |
CONTENTS. :
| I. | Lord Falkland and his Modern Critics, | Church Quarterly Review, | 131 |
| II. | Doris Barugh. A Yorkshire Story. By the author of "Patty." Part II., | Good Words, | 144 |
| III. | Prussian History, | Macmillan's Magazine, | 162 |
| IV. | Green Pastures and Piccadilly. By William Black. Part XXXIII., | Harper's Bazar, | 174 |
| V. | Commodore Goodenough, R.N., | Good Words, | 178 |
| VI. | Africa "Translated," | Spectator, | 182 |
| VII. | A Hidden Life, | Good Words, | 185 |
| VIII. | M. Thiers as an Historian, | Academy, | 189 |
| IX. | M. Thiers' Will, | Academy, | 190 |
POETRY. :
| The Flight of the Swallows, | 130 | Hymn, | 130 |
| A Contrast, | 130 | Love's Arrows, | 191 |
| Miscellany, | Miscellany, | Miscellany, | 192 |
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 135/Issue 1740/The Electric Candle

Originally appeared in Contes Rendus, No. 26, April 17, 1877.
Experiments have been recently conducted at the West India Docks with the view of testing the illuminating power of the so-called electric candle devised by M. Paul Jablochkoff. This simple means of producing a steady electric light consists in placing two carbon pencils side by side, but separated by a bar of a composition called "kaolin." On the passage of the current the carbons slowly burn down, and the kaolin is consumed by the heat at exactly the same rate. The carbons are thus kept always at the same distance apart, and the light playing between them is thus rendered constant without the aid of complex regulators. In the experiments at the West India Docks the current was produced by a magneto-electric machine, worked by a small steam-engine, and the results are described as having been eminently satisfactory. For lights of small and medium size, an apparatus of even greater simplicity may be employed, the carbon points being dispensed with and nothing used beyond a piece of the so-called kaolin held between the electrodes. But M. Jablochkoff's prime improvement, which promises to greatly extend the use of the electric light, consists in his ability to divide the current, so as to supply several candles placed in the same circuit, each with its own coil. These candles may be of various degrees of illuminating power, and may be lighted or extinguished separately. In short, the electricity appears to be under such control, that it might be generated in some central establishment and laid on through wires to the several centres of illumination, just as freely as gas is at present distributed through pipes to any number of burners. MM. Denayrouze and Jablochkoff, who have employed the light in Paris, have described their process before the French Academy of Sciences.
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 135/Issue 1740/The Flight of the Swallows

* THE FLIGHT OF THE SWALLOWS.
* Around the old minster the swallows are flying;
* Soon into white winter the year will be dying;
* Soon, soon the chill winds through the boughs will be sighing,
* And ice will be here;
* South, south are the summer and happy birds singing,
* And sunshine, that only here spring will be bringing,
* So,the wise swallows gather in flocks for their winging
* To warm climes so dear.
* Are they twittering and chattering of bright days departed?
* Of dear happy nest-homes from which they have started?
* How they wheel, as if exiled, they lingered, sad-hearted,
* Their known eaves to leave;
* And why should they thus, stay the moment of starting?
* Why so seem to loathe from grey skies to be parting?
* Think they of the happy hours here they spent, darting
* Through many a red eve?
* Do birds, like to men, hover round parted pleasure?
* Has the past its dear memories, to bird-thoughts a treasure?
* Is the gone to you swallows, oh, sweet beyond measure?
* Ah, that who shall tell?
* Men know not the mysteries that haunt their own being,
* And swallows may hide feelings deep from our seeing.
* Well, fleet ones, speed far, from the snows to come fleeing;
* God guides you. Farewell!
* Sunday Magazine.W. C. Bennett
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 135/Issue 1740/Hymn

* HYMN.
* IMITATED FROM THE FRENCH.
* O thou, my heart's best treasure!
* O Friend unchangeable!
* Sweet spring of ceaseless pleasure
* For all who love thee well!
* Take of my heart possession,
* And reign alone therein,
* Thou, whose dear cross and passion
* Have saved me from my sin.
* Joy of my life! thou feedest
* My soul with living bread;
* Still to faith's sight thou bleedest,
* And richest drops are shed.
* When tired and faint I languish,
* By thee the weak is strong,
* And in my night of anguish
* I tune my loudest song.
* Ah! pour on me thy favor,
* Rich fount of love and grace;
* Around me shine forever,
* Great Sun of Righteousness!
* Without thy smile peace-giving
* Life were but death to me;
* But in thy presence living
* True light and life I see.
* My heart, in closest union
* With thine, dear Lord, made one,
* Finds here in sweet communion,
* Its heaven on earth begun:
* Better 'mid flames fierce-wreathing,
* Safe in thy love to be,
* Than heaven's own fragrance breathing
* If heaven were void of thee!
* Sunday Magazine.Henry Downton
# Men-at-the-Bar/Abdul Hossein

​Abdul Hossein (see Abul Hassan).
# Men-at-the-Bar/A'Beckett, Arthur William

​A'Beckett, Arthur William, editor of the Glow-worm 1864–7, on the staff of Punch, author of Fallen among Thieves and other works, private secretary to parliamentary under-secretary of state for war (Earl of Morley) 1882–3, a student of Gray's Inn 13 June, 1877, called to the bar 3 May, 1882 (3rd son of late Gilbert Abbott A'Beckett, of London, and of Gray's Inn, bar.-at-law, a metropolitan police magistrate); born at Hammersmith, 25 Oct., 1844; married 17 Feb., 1876, Susannah Frances, eldest dau. of late Forbes Winslow, M.D., D.C.L.
    2, Temple Gardens, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Abbs, Henry Cooper

​Abbs, Henry Cooper, a member of the Northern circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 3 June, 1865, called to the bar 6 June, 1868, J.P. co. Durham, patron of Ingleby Arncliffe, Yorks (eldest surviving son of late Cooper Abbs, of Monkwearmouth, co. Durham, by Elizabeth Mary, dau. of late Samuel Thompson, of Newcastle-on-Tyne); born , 1842.
    Cleadon House, Sunderland.
# Men-at-the-Bar/A'Beckett, Thomas

​A'Beckett, Thomas, practises before the supreme court of Melbourne, a student of Lincoln's Inn 18 May, 1857 (then aged 20), obtained a studentship Nov., 1859, called to the bar 17 Nov., 1859 (eldest son of Thomas Turner A'Beckett, Esq., of Walmer House, Collingwood, Victoria); born , 1837.
    Melbourne, Victoria.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Abbey-Williams, Lewis Robert

​Abbey-Williams, Lewis Robert, B.A. Jesus Coll., Oxon, of the South-eastern circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 8 June, 1874, called to the bar 7 May, 1879 (son of Lewis Williams, of Bryntirion, co. Merioneth, deceased); born , .
    6, Pump Court, Temple, E.C.; Grafton Club, Grafton Street, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Abbott, Ernest Frederick

​Abbott, Ernest Frederick, practises before the British Supreme Consular Court, Constantinople, a student of the Middle Temple 14 Nov., 1864, called to the bar 11 June, 1867 (son of Richard Benjamin Abbott, Esq., of Smyrna, Asia Minor, dec.); born ,.
    Constantinople.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Abdy, John Thomas

​Abdy, John Thomas, LL.D., judge of county courts (No. 38) since 1871, recorder of Bedford since 1870, LL.B. Trin. Hall, Camb., 1847, LL.D. 1852, fellow 1850, regius professor of laws Cambridge 1854–73, examiner in civil law Cambridge 1854–74, in law and history 1874–5, in law tripos 1876–7, professor of law to Gresham Coll., went the Eastern circuit and the Home circuit, J.P. Herts and Cambridge borough, author of Historical Sketch of Civil Procedure among the Romans, etc., a student of the Inner Temple 12 Oct., 1842, called to the bar 29 Jan., 1850 (eldest son of Col. James Nicholas Abdy); born at Madras 5 July, 1822; married at Gunby, Lincolnshire, 7 July, 1854, Marion, 2nd dau. of John Hardwick Hollway, Esq., of Gunby, aforesaid, and has issue (see Foster's Baronetage).
    Manor House, High Beech, Essex.
# Men-at-the-Bar/A'Beckett, Edward FitzHayley

​A'Beckett, Edward FitzHayley, a member of the Victoria bar, a student of Lincoln's Inn 5 Jan., 1858 (then aged 21), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1860 (3rd son of Sir William A'Beckett, chief justice of colony of Victoria); born , 1837.
    Melbourne, Victoria.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Abdur-Rahman (Abul Fazl Mahomed)

​Abdur-Rahman (Abul Fazl Mahomed), practises before the High Court at Calcutta, a student of the Inner Temple 26 May, 1877 (then aged 20), called to the bar 21 April, 1880 (eldest son of the Moulvi Abdool Luteef, Khan Bahadur, of Calcutta, late member of Bengal Legislative Counci)l; born , 1857.
    Calcutta.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Abdur-Rahmun (Syud)

​Abdur-Rahmun (Syud), F.S.S., F.R.C. India, practises before the High Court at Madras, a student of the Inner Temple 7 Nov., 1877 (then aged 20), called to the bar 9 June, 1880 (only son of late Moulvi Syud Ghulam Abbas, of Fahidpur, India, zemindar); born , 1857.
    Fahidpur, Bengal.
# McCrary v. Indiana

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
364 U.S. 277
McCrary v. Indiana
Argued: June 27, 1960. ---
John Clifford McCrary, pro se.
Messrs. Edwin K. Steers, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, and Richard M. Givan, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McCrary v. Aladdin Industries/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
355 U.S. 8
McCrary v. Aladdin Industries
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals of the State of Tennessee, Middle Division, is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Helpers & Taxicab Drivers, etc., v. Kerrigan, 353 U.S. 968, 77 S.Ct. 1055, 1 L.Ed.2d 1133.
Mr. Justice BLACK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McCray v. Illinois

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
386 U.S. 300
McCray v. Illinois
Argued: Jan. 10 and 11, 1967. --- Decided: March 20, 1967
See 386 U.S. 1042, 87 S.Ct. 1474.
R. Eugene Pincham, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.
John J. O'Toole, Chicago, Ill., for respondent.
Mr. Justice STEWART delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McCrary v. Aladdin Industries

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
355 U.S. 8
McCrary v. Aladdin Industries
Messrs. Albert Williams, Cecil D. Branstetter and Jerome A. Cooper, for petitioners.
Messrs. J. Paschall Davis and Walton H. Hamilton, for respondents.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Division.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McCrary v. Indiana/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
364 U.S. 277
McCrary v. Indiana
Argued: June 27, 1960. ---
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the writ of certiorari are granted. Petitioner's attempted appeal to the Supreme Court of Indiana from a denial of relief in a post-conviction coram nobis proceeding was dismissed because of his failure to comply with rules of that court, requiring, inter alia, the filing of a transcript of the trial proceedings. He alleges that the dismissal denied him the equal protection of the laws because he was and is unable to pay for the preparation of such a transcript, see Griffin v. People of State of Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, 76 S.Ct. 585, 100 L.Ed. 891, and that although he attempted to avail himself of the services of the Indiana Public Defender, who is empowered to secure the preparation of such a transcript in paupers' cases, see Burns' Indiana Stats. (1956 Repl.), § 13-1401 et seq., that officer declined to assist him. The record before us does not disclose whether these allegations were made to, and passed on by, the Indiana Supreme Court in light of Griffin v. People of State of Illinois, supra. Accordingly we vacate the order of dismissal and remand the case to it for further consideration of the appeal.
Order vacated and case remanded.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Parker, John Francis

​Parker, John Francis, a student of the Middle Temple 21 April, 1834, called to the bar 5 May, 1837 (only son of Richard Leslie Parker, Esq., of Waterford, dec.); born , .
# Men-at-the-Bar/Parker, Thomas

​Parker, Thomas, a student of Gray's Inn 1 Feb., 1822, called to the bar 18 Nov., 1829, bencher 19 Dec., 1866, treasurer 1870 (eldest son of Thomas Parker, Esq., of London); born , .
    5, Henrietta Street Brunswick Square, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Parker, William

​Parker, William, a student of the Middle Temple 1 Nov., 1847, called to the bar 8 Nov., 1850 (eldest son of James Parker, of London, optician); born , .
# Men-at-the-Bar/Parkin, John Samuel

​Parkin, John Samuel, M.A., fellow of Clare Coll., Camb., 1870, a student of Lincoln's Inn 29 May, 1867 (then aged 23), called to the bar 30 April, 1870 (eldest son of Rev. John Parkin, vicar of Halton, Hastings); born 11 Dec, 1843.
    11, New Square, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Parkin, Montagu Lewis

​Parkin, Montagu Lewis, B.A., St. John's Coll., Oxon, 1879, a student of Lincoln's Inn 9 Nov., 1877 (then aged 20), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1881 (eldest son of George Lewis Parkin, Esq., of London); born , 1857.
    22, Park Lane, W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Parker, Hon. Francis

​Parker, Hon. Francis, M.A. Christ Church, Oxon, B.A. 1873, a member of the Oxford circuit, a student of the Middle Temple 3 Aug., 1871, went to the Inner Temple 6 Nov., 1871, where he was called to the bar 26 Jan., 1875 (4th son of Thomas Augustus, 6th earl of Macclesfield); born 15 Aug., 1851; married 16 Feb., 1882, Henrietta, 3rd dau. of Henry Lomax Gaskell, Esq., of Kiddington Hall, Oxon, and has issue (see Foster's Peerage).
    6, Hobart Place, S.W.; 3, Temple Gardens, E.C.; Junior Carlton Club.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Parker, Kenyon Charles Shirecliffe

​Parker, Kenyon Charles Shirecliffe, an examiner of High Court of Justice since Feb., 1884, a student of Lincoln's Inn 18 Jan., 1860 (then aged 18), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1862 (eldest son of Kenyon Stevens Parker, Q.C., one of the masteis of the bench); born , 1842.
    158, Finborough Road, S.W.; 13, Old Square, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Parker, Robert John

​Parker, Robert John, M.A., King's Coll., Camb., 1883, a student of the Inner Temple 22 Jan., 1881 (then aged 23), went to Lincoln's Inn 3 Nov., 1883, where he was called to the bar 17 Nov., 1883 (3rd son of Rev. Richard Parker, rector of Claxby, co. Linc.); born , 1858.
    2, Harcourt Buildings, E.C., or 3, New Square, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Parkes, Robert Byerley

​Parkes, Robert Byerley, LL.B. London Univ. (honours) 1884, a student of Gray's Inn 16 June, 1881, Holt scholar 1882, third common law prize, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1885 (only son of Thomas William Parkes, of Hanwell, Middlesex); born 15 Dec, 1861.
    3, Richmond Villas, Hanwell.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Parker, Reginald

​Parker, Reginald, B.A., Univ. Coll., Oxon, 1859, a student of Lincoln's Inn 22 Nov., 1858 (then aged 23), called to the bar 6 June, 1861 (eldest son of Henry Parker, Esq., of Ferriby, Yorks); born , 1835.
    69, Gloucester Place, Hyde Park, N.W.