OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Public Law 117-120

Note: This is the original legislation as it was initially enacted. Any subsequent amendments hosted on Wikisource may be listed using What Links Here.
An Act To designate the Federal Office Building located at 308 W. 21st Street in Cheyenne, Wyoming, as the ‘‘Louisa Swain Federal Office Building’’, and for other purposes
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled

### SECTION 1. LOUISA SWAIN FEDERAL OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal Office Building located at 308 W. 21st Street in Cheyenne, Wyoming, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Louisa Swain Federal Office Building’’.
    (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal Office Building referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Louisa Swain Federal Office Building’’.
Approved May 10, 2022.

## Legaslative History

    S. 2126:
    CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: Vol. 167 (2021):
       Oct. 7, considered and passed Senate. Vol. 168 (2022):
       Mar. 30, considered and passed House.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Remington v. Central Pacific Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
198 U.S. 95
Remington v. Central Pacific Railroad Company
Argued: February 27, 1905. --- Decided: April 17, 1905
Mr. James G. Flanders for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Maxwell Evarts for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Remington v. Linthicum

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
39 U.S. 84
Remington v. Linthicum

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Remington Rand v. National Labor Relations Board/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
304 U.S. 576
Remington Rand v. National Labor Relations Board
For opinion below, see 94 F.2d 862.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Remington Paper Company v. Watson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
173 U.S. 443
Remington Paper Company v. Watson
E. T. Merrick, for plaintiff in error.
Alex. Porter Morse, for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice McKENNA delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Remington Rand v. National Labor Relations Board

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
304 U.S. 576
Remington Rand v. National Labor Relations Board
Messrs. George H. Bond, of Syracuse, N. Y., and George H. Cohen, of Hartford, Conn., for petitioner.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Remington v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
343 U.S. 907
Remington v. United States
Messrs. William C. Chanler and Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., for petitioner.
Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General McInerney, Robert L. Stern and Beatrice Rosenberg, for the United States.
Mr. Justice BLACK, with whom Mr. Justice DOUGLAS concurs, dissenting.
A federal district court grand jury indicted petitioner for perjury. A petit jury convicted him. The Court of Appeals reversed but refused to order the indictment dismissed. 191 F.2d 246. Petitioner is now seeking certiorari, claiming that the indictment should have been dismissed. The majority now denies his petition. I think we should grant and consider two questions the petitioner presents. These questions challenge the fairness of the prosecutorial methods used to obtain and to sustain the indictment.
Dissenting memorandum filed by Mr. Justice BLACK, with whom Mr. Justice DOUGLAS concurs.
Mr. Justice CLARK took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pygmalion

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category.
Pygmalion (1913) is a play by George Bernard Shaw. It tells the story of Henry Higgins, a professor of phonetics, who makes a bet with his friend Colonel Pickering that he can turn a Cockney flower girl, Eliza Doolittle, into a refined society lady merely by teaching her how to speak with an upper class accent and training her in etiquette. In the process, Higgins and Doolittle grow close, but she ultimately rejects his domineering ways and marries Freddy Eynsford-Hill, a young but poor gentleman.
    Warning: template has been deprecated.
* Preface
* Act I
* Act II
* Act III
* Act IV
* Act V
* Appendix
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1950, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 73 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pygmies

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Pygmies."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.

### Fiction

* "The Pygmies," by Nathaniel Hawthorne in Tanglewood Tales (1853)
* "The Pygmies," by Nathaniel Hawthorne in Tanglewood Tales (1921)

### Non-fiction

* "The Pygmy Monkey" by Émile Oustalet in Popular Science Monthly, 13 (June 1878)
* "The Pygmy in the United States" by James Weir Jr. in Popular Science Monthly, 49 (May 1896)
* "The African Pygmies" by S. P. Verner in Popular Science Monthly, 69 (November 1906)
# Pyle v. Kansas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
317 U.S. 213
Pyle v. Kansas
Argued: Nov. 9, 10, 1942. --- Decided: Dec 7, 1942
Mr. Joseph P. Tumulty, Jr., of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Jay Kyle, of Topeka, Kan., for respondents.
Mr. Justice MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Psychology of the Unconscious

* information about this edition.
* related portals: Psychology.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, quotes, Wikidata item.

## Contents

* Translator's Note
* Introduction (by Beatrice M. Hinkle)
* Author's Note
* Part I
** Introduction
** Chapter I
** Chapter II
** Chapter III
** Chapter IV
* Part II
** Chapter I
** Chapter II
** Chapter III
** Chapter IV
** Chapter V
** Chapter VI
** Chapter VII
** Chapter VIII
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Psychology of the Unconscious/Author's Note

Layout 2
AUTHOR’S NOTE
My task in this work has been to investigate an individual phantasy system, and in the doing of it problems of such magnitude have been uncovered, that my endeavor to grasp them in their entirety has necessarily meant only a superficial orientation toward those paths, the opening and exploration of which may possibly crown the work of future investigators with success.
I am not in sympathy with the attitude which favors the repression of certain possible working hypotheses because they are perhaps erroneous, and so may possess no lasting value. Certainly I endeavored as far as possible to guard myself from error, which might indeed become especially dangerous upon these dizzy heights, for I am entirely aware of the risks of these investigations. However, I do not consider scientific work as a dogmatic contest, but rather as a work done for the increase and deepening of knowledge.
This contribution is addressed to those having similar ideas concerning science.
In conclusion, I must render thanks to those who have assisted my endeavors with valuable aid, especially my dear wife and my friends, to whose disinterested assistance I am deeply indebted.
C. G. Jung.
Zurich.
# Psychological Review

Wikipedia: Psychological Review
* Volume 1 (1894) IA
* Volume 2 (1895) IA
* Volume 3 (1896) IA
* Volume 4 (1897) IA
* Volume 5 (1898)
* Volume 6 (1899) IA
* Volume 7 (1900) IA
* Volume 8 (1901) IA
* Volume 9 (1902) IA
* Volume 10 (1903) IA
* Volume 11 (1904) IA
* Volume 12 (1905) IA
* Volume 13 (1906) IA
* Volume 14 (1907) IA
* Volume 15 (1908) IA
* Volume 16 (1909) IA
* Volume 17 (1910) IA
* Volume 18 (1911) IA
* Volume 19 (1912) IA
* Volume 20 (1913)
* Volume 21 (1914) IA
* Volume 22 (1915) IA
* Volume 23 (1916) IA
* Volume 24 (1917) IA
* Volume 25 (1918) IA
* Volume 26 (1919) IA
* Volume 27 (1920) IA
* Volume 28 (1921) IA
* Volume 29 (1922)
* Volume 30 (1923)
* Volume 31 (1924)
* Volume 32 (1925)
* Volume 33 (1924)
* Volume 34 (1925)
* Volume 35 (1926)
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Punch/Volume 147/Issue 3812/The Missionary

THE MISSIONARY.
Where Oriental calm derides
Our Occidental stress
And Ninety-seven E. collides
With Five-and-twenty S.,
You'll find a product of the West,
A Bachelor of Arts,
Who blends a mind of youthful zest
With patriarchal parts.
Each morning mid his rubber trees
He rides an ancient hack,
A cassock girt above his knees,
A topee tilted back.
Now reining in his steed to preach
A parable on sap,
Now vaulting from his seat to teach
The proper way to tap.
His swart disciples knit their brows
O'er algebraic signs;
They build their byres, they milk their cows
On scientific lines.
They use his microscope and gaze
On strange bacterial risks;
They tune their daily hymns of praise
To gramophonic discs.
And every evening after grace,
When converts clear the cloth,
He pins an orchid to its place
Or camphorates a moth.
Out of the world his path may run, Yet still in worldly wise
He'll talk of feats with rod or gun,
A twinkle in his eyes,
And tell of tiger-stalking nights,
Of mornings with the snipe,
With never a pause save when he lights
An antiquated pipe.
We others earn our pensioned ease,
The furlough of our kind;
We book our berths, we cross the seas,
But he shall stay behind,
Plodding his round of feast and fast,
Dreaming the dreams of yore,
Of England as he saw her last
In 1884.
J. M. S.
# Punch/Volume 147/Issue 3812/The Power Behind

THE POWER BEHIND.
Austria (at the ultimatum stage.) "I DON'T QUITE LIKE HIS ATTITUDE. SOMEBODY MUST BE BACKING HIM."
# Punch/Volume 147/Issue 3812/The Uses of Ocean

THE USES OF OCEAN.
(Lines written in an irresponsible holiday mood.)
To people who allege that we Incline to overrate the Sea, I answer, "We do not; Apart from being coloured blue, It has its uses not a few— I cannot think what we should do. LIf ever 'the deep did rot.'"
Take ships, for instance. You will note That, lacking stuff on which to float, They could not get about; Dreadnought and liner, smack and yawl, And other types that you'll recall— They simply could not sail at all It Ocean once gave out.
And see the trouble which it saves To islands; but for all those waves That made us what we are— But for their help so kindly lent, Teutons could march right through to Kent And never need to circumvent A single British tar.
Take fish, again. I have in mind No better field that they could find For exercise and sport; How would the whale, I want to know, The blubbery whale contrive to blow; Where would your playful kipper go If the supply ran short?
And hence we rank the Ocean high; But there are privy reasons why Its praise is on my lip: I deem it, when my heart is set On walking into something wet, The nicest medium I have met In which to take a dip.
Ah, speed the hour already fixed When, mid the bathers (freely mixed), In a polite costume I mean to plunge beneath the spray And, washing from a soul at play The City's stain—three times a day— Restore its vernal bloom.
Rocked like a babe upon the brine It is my dream to float supine And to the vast inane Banish awhile from off my chest The cares that hold it now obsessed, And even take a clean-cut rest From Ulster-on-the-brain.
O. S.
# Punch/Volume 147/Issue 3812/The Young of the Sea-Serpent

THE YOUNG OF THE SEA-SERPENT.
With the approach of the silly season one's thoughts turn naturally to the prospect of stealing into print and enjoying all the sweets of authorship without the reception of a cheque to vulgarise them. An infinite variety of topics, our representative gathered yesterday, is now on the eve of discussion, and the quill that cannot find something to say on at least one of them had better return to its native goose without delay.
"Mother of Ten," we were informed by the courteous editor of The Halfpenny Bleater, will as usual open that journal's discussion, and this year her thoughts have turned to bathing fatalities. "Should Land Crabs Learn Swimming" is the subject which she (or, to betray an office secret, he) has selected. Due emphasis on the necessity for university costume in the case of an affirmative reply to the question will be laid by "Paterfamilias," who will contribute the second letter of the series.
The Morning Dip will maintain its reputation for intellectuality with a spiritual discussion on "Has Life a Double Meaning?" or "Is Existence a Joke?"—the exact title has not yet been decided. "Constant Reader" has already bought a penny packet of assorted stationary and charged it to the office petty cash, and only a really good murder can prevent the early appearance of his letter. As readers will remember, correct spelling is a feature of this author's work.
In pursuance of its settled policy The Daily Giggle will appeal more especially to the fair sex. There is more than a touch of pathos in the signature "Orphan Boy," which will appear at the foot of his letter on the subject, "Are First Cousins Kissable?"
Perhaps, however, the most vital question of all will be raised in The Daily Jingo, where "Pro Bono Publico" will lay down his views on "Our Softening Sinews." In his well-known style, which is so happy a blend of public spirit and split infinitives, he will plead for less indulgence in our dealings with the young. "We are," he says in his peroration, which we were privileged to see, "raising up a soft breed, and we shall live to bitterly rue it. The future of the race is, of course, on the knees of the gods, but let us determine to also lay it across the knee of parent and schoolmaster. So shall the rising generation learn the merits of the strong right arm that has make England what it is."
In conjunction with The Perfect Little Lady, which will discuss "The Highest Type of Man," the editor of The Brain Pan will throw open his columns to all those with views on "The Most Attractive Girl." For the start he has secured the services of "Virile Englishman," who will put aside her knitting to take up the pen in obedience to his commands. The Perfect Little Lady's first letter will be contributed by "Sweet Seventeen," who has studied her subject by diligent attendance at all the best boxing matches of the current year.
# Punch/Volume 147/Issue 3812/What of the Dawn?

WHAT OF THE DAWN?
# Roberts v. Graham

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
73 U.S. 578
Roberts v. Graham
ERROR to the Circuit Court for the Northern District of California.
Mr. Brady, for the plaintiff in error; Messrs. Carlisle and McPherson, contra.
Mr. Justice SWAYNE stated the case and delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Roberts v. Cooper

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Roberts v. Cooper."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Roberts v. Cooper (60 U.S. 373)
* Roberts v. Cooper (61 U.S. 467)
See also Cooper v. Roberts.
# Roberts v. City of New York

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
295 U.S. 264
Roberts v. City of New York
Argued: and Submitted April 2, 3, 1935. --- Decided: April 29, 1935
Messrs. Charles E. Hughes, Jr., Carl M. Owen, and Harold C. McCollom, all of New York City, for petitioners.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Roberts v. LaVallee

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 40
Roberts v. LaVallee
Warren H. Greene, Jr., for petitioner.
Leon B. Polsky, for Legal Aid Society of New York, amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Roberts v. Cooper (60 U.S. 373)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
60 U.S. 373
Roberts v. Cooper
THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Michigan.
It will be seen, by reference to 18 Howard, that this court, at the last term, in a case between these same parties, decided in favor of Cooper's title to a tract of land in Michigan. In order to recover a part of the tract which was not included in the former suit, Cooper brought an ejectment against Roberts, and obtained a judgment against him. Roberts then brought the case up to this court by writ of error.
But in consequence of its being so low upon the docket as not to be reached at the present term, Mr. Vinton, counsel for Cooper, moved for an order requiring the plaintiff in error to give additional security in the sum of $25,000, or for such other sum as, in the judgment of the court, would be sufficient to answer all damages and costs which Cooper might suffer if the writ of error should not be prosecuted with effect; and filed an affidavit by Cooper in support thereof.
The motion was argued by Mr. Vinton in support, and by Mr. Romeyn against it.
Mr. Justice WAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Proclamation 7147

Delivered on 17 November 1998.
By the President of the United States of America A Proclamation
Thanks in large part to our Nation's farmers, the quality of life the American people enjoy today is the envy of the world. Farmers and ranchers provide us with a safe, abundant, and affordable supply of food and fiber. American agriculture remains one of our country's most important and productive industries, generating more than 22 million jobs and contributing a trillion dollars to the American economy each year. Today's farmers and ranchers also serve as guardians of our precious environment. Using modern technology and environmentally responsible methods, they have improved our Nation's water supply, worked to reduce soil erosion, and restored thousands of acres of wetlands.
This remarkable record of achievement would not be possible, however, without the essential farm-city partnerships that contribute so much to the productivity of America's farms and ranches. From seed and fertilizer merchants to agricultural processors, from research scientists in the laboratory to extension agents in the field, from shippers and manufacturers to inspectors and grocers, urban and rural Americans work together to share the bounty of this land with their fellow citizens and with people around the world.
For more than 40 years, Americans have set aside this special week to recognize and reflect upon the importance of these partnerships in sustaining our Nation's strength and prosperity. As we celebrate Thanksgiving with family and friends, let us remember to count among our many blessings America's agricultural abundance and the collaboration between rural and urban communities that has contributed so much to the quality of our lives.
Now, Therefore, I, William J. Clinton, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim November 20 through November 26, 1998, as National Farm-City Week. I call upon all Americans, in rural and urban communities alike, to join in recognizing the accomplishments of our farmers and all the hardworking individuals who cooperate to produce a wealth of affordable, quality agricultural goods that strengthen and enrich our country.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this seventeenth day of November, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-third.
William J. Clinton
[Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 11:45 a.m., November 18, 1998]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse