OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Broadcasting Act 1981 (United Kingdom)/Schedule3

SCHEDULE 3
Teletext services
Provisons of Act Applied by Section 14(5)
| Provision | Subject-matter |
| Section 3(1) and (2), except subsection (2)(a) and (c). | General powers of Authority, and provision of programmes in cases where no programme contractor is available. |
| Section 4(7). | Making and use by the Authority of visual and sound records of programmes broadcast by them. |
| Section 8(1) and (2). | Inclusion of advertisements in programmes, reception of orders for their insertion, and provision precluding the Authority or any programme contractor from acting as an advertising agent. |
| Section 16(1). | Advisory committees. |
| Section 19. | Duration of contracts and prior consultation etc. |
| Section 20, except subsections (1), (2)(b) and (3). | Duties of Authority in relation to contracts for programmes. |
| Sections 21 and 23 to 25. | Other provisions applying to all contracts for programmes. |
| Section 27. | Information as to programme contracts. |
| Section 28. | Government control over the Authority as to hours of broadcasting. ​ |
| Sections 32 to 35. | Rental payments by programme contractors, instalments payable by them on account, and provision for supplementary additional payments. |
| Section 43(3)(b) | Report on provision by programme contractors of training facilities. |
| Section 45. | Audience research. |
| Section 61. | Approvals by Authority. |
| In section 63(1), the definition of " broadcast relay station ". | Interpretation. |
| Schedule 4. | Supplementary provisions about rental payments. |
Part II Other Provisions Applied by Section 14(5)
| Provision | Subject-matter |
| Paragraph 8 of Part I of Schedule 7 to the Fair Trading Act 1973 | Services in respect of which no monopoly reference may be made to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission. |
| Section 9 of the Industry Act 1975. Fair Trading Act 1973 | Restrictions on activities of National Enterprise Board in relation to news media. |
| Section 19 of the Welsh Development Agency Act 1975 | Restrictions on activities of Welsh Development Agency in relation to news media. |
* ↑ The printed version contained a margin note cross referencing Section 14 (5)of the Act at this point.
* ↑ 1973 c. 41
* ↑ 1973 c. 68
* ↑ 1975 c. 70
# California v. American Stores Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Kennedy
United States Supreme Court
492 U.S. 1301
California v. American Stores Company
No. A-151 (89-258)
Justice O'CONNOR, Circuit Justice.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# California ex rel. Bryant v. Holladay/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
159 U.S. 415
California ex rel. Bryant v. Holladay
The opinions of the supreme court of California in this case are reported 68 Cal. 439, 9 Pac. 655; 93 Cal. 241, 29 Pac. 54; 102 Cal. 661, 36 Pac. 927. The motion to dismiss is sustained on the authority of San Francisco v. Itsell, 133 U.S. 65, 10 Sup. Ct. 241; Beatty v. Benton, 135 U.S. 244, 10 Sup. Ct. 747; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U.S. 361, 14 Sup. Ct. 131, and cases cited. And see Hoadley v. San Francisco, 94 U.S. 4; Hoadley's Adm'r v. San Francisco, 124 U.S. 639, 8 Sup. Ct. 659.
Writ of error dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# California Water Service Company v. City of Redding

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
304 U.S. 252
California Water Service Company v. City of Redding
On Motion to Dismiss or Affirm April 23, 1938.
Decided May 16, 1938.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
Messrs. Warren Olney, Jr., of San Francisco, Cal., Seth W. Richardson, of Washington, D.C., Francis Carr, of Redding, Cal., and A. Crawford Greene, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.
Messrs. George Herrington and W. H. Orrick, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# California ex rel. Bryant v. Holladay

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
159 U.S. 415
California ex rel. Bryant v. Holladay
[Syllabus from pages 415-417 intentionally omitted]
Wm. Matthews and Wm. Craig, for plaintiff in error.
S. W. Holladay and E. Burke Holladay, for defendants in error.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# California v. Acevedo/Dissent White

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Scalia
* Dissenting Opinions White Stevens
* Wikipedia article
Justice WHITE, dissenting.
Agreeing as I do with most of Justice STEVENS' opinion and with the result he reaches, I dissent and would affirm the judgment below.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Brown v. Rank

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
132 U.S. 216
Brown v. Rank
Leander Holmes, for appellants.
W. W. Upton and A. H. Garland, for appellee.
FULLER, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Brown v. Pacific Coast Coal Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
241 U.S. 571
Brown v. Pacific Coast Coal Company
Argued: March 14, 1916. --- Decided: June 12, 1916
Messrs. H. R. Lea, Charles F. Consaul, and Charles C. Heltman for petitioner.
Messrs. C. H. Farrell, W. B. Stratton,
J. H. Kane, and Stanley J. Padden for respondent.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Brown v. Piper

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
91 U.S. 37
Brown v. Piper
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.
Piper filed a bill to enjoin Brown and Seavey from infringing two patents, one of which, not being insisted on at the hearing, need not be considered. The other-No. 732, dated March 19, 1861 makes claim as follows:--
'Preserving fish and other articles in a close chamber by means of a freezing mixture, having no contact with the atmosphere of the preserving chamber.'
The defendants by their answer, among other objections not necessary to be mentioned, denied the novelty of the alleged invention.
The court below rendered a decree sustaining the validity of the patent, and perpetually enjoined the defendants from using or employing the invention therein described. They bring this appeal.
Mr. George Gifford and Mr. Edward Avery for appellants.
Mr. Causten Browne for appellee.
MR. JUSTICE SWAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Anton Martin Slomšek

From volume 14 of the work.
Slomöek, Anton Martin, Bishop of Lavant, in Maribor, Styria, Austria, noted Slovenian educator, born 1800; died 24 Sept., 1862. The dawn of the nineteenth century found the Slovenian schools in a precarious condition; their number was pitifully small, and the courses they offered were inadequate and unsatisfactory. This deplorable state was due to the fact that the Austrian officials endeavoured to suppress the national language, and, to compass this end, introduced foreign teachers thoroughly distasteful to the people, whom in turn they despised. Moreover, books, magazines, papers, and other educational influences were lacking, not because they would not have been gladly welcomed, but because they were forbidden by the Government in its fear of Panslavism. This situation Bishop Slomöek was compelled to face. A man of initiative and discernment, the changes he wrought in a short time were wonderful. In the Constitution of 1848, granting national rights long denied, he found his instrument. Following this measure, though only after many futile attempts, he received official sanction to undertake the reform of the schools. The first fruits of his labours were a series of excellent text-books, many from his own pen, which proved powerful factors in the growth and development of religious as well as national education. The founding of the weekly, "Drobtinice" (Crumbs), was his next step. Essays and books on a great variety of subjects, embracing practically every question on which his countrymen stood in need of enlightenment, were published in quick succession, and his vigorous and incisive style, well adapted to the intelligence of his readers, though not lacking scholarly refinement, made his works exceedingly popular. His pastorals and sermons constitute a literature of lasting value. In 1841 he sought to realize a dream of years - the establishment of a society for the spread of Catholic literature. Unfortunately, the movement was branded as Panslavistic, and failed at the time; but ten years later this organization was effected, and Druzba sv. Mohora began sending a few instructive books to Catholic homes. To-day, a million educational volumes have been distributed among a million and a half of people.
Although Slomöek was ardent and active in the interests of his own race, yet he was admired and loved by great men of other nations, and his kindness and tact eliminated all bitterness from the controversies in which he was forced to engage. Patriotism, the education of his people. their temporal and spiritual welfare, were his inspiring motives, as the non-Catholic Makusev remarks: "Education, based on religion and nationality, was his lofty aim". Humility and childlike simplicity marked his life. His priests, sincerely devoted to him, frequently heard him repeat the words: "When I was born, my mother laid me on a bed of straw, and I desire no better pallet when I die, asking only to be in the state of grace and worthy of salvation".
GRAFENANER, Hist. of Slovenian Literature (1862).
P. Cyril Zupan.
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Anton Sander

From volume 13 of the work.
Historian, b. at Antwerp, 1586; d. at Afflighem, Belgium, 10 Jan., 1664. Having become master of philosophy at Douai in 1609, he studied theology for some years under Malderus at Louvain, and Estius at Douai, and was ordained priest at Ghent. For some years he was engaged in parochial duties, and combated the Anabaptist movement in Flanders with great zeal and success. In 1625 he became secretary and almoner of Cardinal Alphonsus de la Cueva, later becoming canon, and in 1654 penitentiary at Ypres. After three years, however, he resigned this office to devote himself entirely to scientific, and especially to historical studies. He soon found himself compelled to claim the hospitality of the Benedictine Abbey of Afflighem, since he had reduced himself to absolute poverty by the publication of numerous works. He combined high intellectual gifts with great zeal, and left behind forty-two printed, and almost as many unprinted, works. The most important are the following: "De scriptoribus Flandriae libri III" (Antwerp, 1624); "De Gandavensibus eruditionis fama claris" (Antwerp 1624), "De Brugensibus eruditionis fama claris libri II" (Antwerp, 1624); "Hagiologium Flandriae sive de sanctis eius provinciae liber unus" (Antwerp, 1625; 2nd ed., Lille, 1639). A general edition of these four works appeared under the title: "Flandria illustrata" (2 vols., Cologne, 1641-44; The Hague, 1726). Of his other works may be mentioned: "Elogia cardinalium sanctitate, doctrina et armis illustrium" (Louvain, 1625): "Gandavium sive rerum Gandavensium libri VI" (Brussels, 1627); "Bibliotheca belgica manuscripta" (2 parts, Lille, 1641-3); "Chorographia sacra Brabantiae sive celebrium in ea provincia ecclesiarum et coenobiorum descriptio, imaginibus aeneis illustrata" (Brussels, 1659; The Hague, 1726); this is his chief work.
FOPPENS, Bibl. Belgica, I (Brussels, 1739), 87 sqq.; HURTER, Nomenclator.
PATRICIUS SCHLAGER
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Antoine de Mouchy

From volume 10 of the work.
(Called DEMOCHARES.)
Theologian and canonist, b. 1494, at Ressons-sur-Matz, near Beauvais, in Picardy; d. 8 May 1574, at Paris. In 1539 he was appointed rector of the University of Paris. He was also professor at the Sorbonne and canon Pnitentiarius of Noyon. As inquisitor fidei he exerted his influence against the Calvinists. In 1562 he accompanied the Cardinal of Lorraine to the Council of Trent, and in 1564 was present at the Synod of Reims. Mouchy wrote a work in defence of the Mass (Paris, 1562), and edited the "Corpus juris canonici" (3 vols. fol., including the glossa, Paris, 1561; 4 vols. 8vo, without the glossa, Paris, 1547-50; 7 vols. l2mo, Lyons, 1554).
SCHERER in Kirchenlex., s.v.
LEO A. KELLY
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Antoine le Gaudier

From volume 6 of the work.
A writer on asectic theology; b. at Château-Thierry, France, 7 January, 1572; d. at Paris, 14 April, 1622. About the age of twenty he entered the Society of Jesus at Tournay. Later on he was rector at Liège, professor of Holy Scripture at Pont-à-Mousson, and of moral theology at La Flèche. In these two last-named posts he was also charged with the spiritual direction of his brethren, and showed such an aptitude for this branch of the ministry that he was named master of novices and tertians. His appointment to these offices shows that Gaudier, since he died at the age of fifty must have evinced an early intellectual maturity and an exceptional talent for the guidance of souls. In the discharge of his various functions, he found an opportunity of developing before a domestic audience the principal matter of asceticism, which he elaborated little by little into a complete treatise. The eagerness shown to possess his spiritual writings led him at last to publish them. There then appeared successively in Latin; "De Sanctissimo Christi Jesu amore opusculum" (Pont-à-Mousson, 1619), translated into English by G. Tickell, S.J. ("The Love of Our Lord Jesus Christ", Derby, 1864); "De verâ Christi Jesu imitatione"; "De Dei praesentiâ"; "Praxis meditandi a B.P. Ignatio traditae explicatio" (Paris, 1620). There are French translations of these four works. After the death of Father Gaudier all his spiritual works, both printed and unedited, were collected in one folio volume under the title "De naturâ et statibus perfectionis" (Paris, 1643), a better edition in three octavo volumes being later supplied by Father J. Martinow, S.J. (Paris, 1856-8). While this great treatise is of special interest to Jesuits, since it is primarily intended for their instiute, it is regarded by enlightened judges as one of the most beautiful and solid monuments of Catholic asceticism. The whole of the speculative part is of general interest, and the practical part, with the exception of rare passages, is equally so. It contains a thirty days' retreat according to the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius, which has been separately edited several times since 1643. The great value of the work is heightened by the fact that Gaudier had personal intercourse with the immediate disciples of the saint.
Paul Debuchy.
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Anton Berlage

From volume 2 of the work.
Dogmatic theologian, b. 21 December, 1805, at Münster, Westphalia; d. there, 6 December, 1881. He studied philosophy and theology in the same city, after completing his course at the Gymnasium, and proceeded to the University of Bonn in 1826. Esser, at Münster, and especially Hermes, at Bonn, led him to such speculations in theology as would have proved detrimental, had he not prosecuted his studies at Tübingen, during 1829 and 1830, under Drey, Hirscher, and Möhler, who influenced him by their historic method, thus saving him from the danger of philosophical systems then prevalent in Germany. He graduated as Doctor of Theology at the University of Munich while yet a deacon, and soon after began his long career as professor in the Academy of Münster, his native town, where he taught till his death. In 1832 he was ordained priest without ever having taken a course in any ecclesiastical seminary. His first book, "Apologetik der Kirche", was published in 1835, and favourably noticed by Protestant critics. He was appointed, first, associate professor, then regular professor, lecturing on apologetics and moral theology, but he ultimately restricted himself to dogmatic theology. His influence on the theological faculty of the Academy was so marked that its spirit may be said to be his. He became dean of the faculty in 1849 and, with Bisping, Schwane, and others, established the fame of his Alma Mater, excelling less in speculation than in argument and in positive exposition of dogma. Kihn numbers him among those who discussed theological matters philosophically, while Knöpfler regards him as belonging to the Tübingen school. Bruck, in his history of the Catholic Church in the nineteenth century, declares, "Berlage's writings excel in correct expression of dogmatic principles, in elegance of language, and in clearness of diction". Those who have been his pupils say that as a lecturer he was concise, direct, and refined. He garnered the fruit of his studies in seven volumes, "Katholische Dogmatik", published 1839-64.
Kaulen in Kirchenlex., s. v.; Bruck, Geschichte der Kathol. Kirche im XIX, Jahrhundert; Kihn, Encyclopadie und Methodologie der Theologie, 404; Knopfler, Lehrbuch der Kirchengeschichte, 727; Litterarische Handweiser, 1881, no. 303.
JOS. SELINGER
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Anton Dereser

From volume 4 of the work.
(Known also as THADDAEUS A S. ADAMO).
Born at Fahr in Franconia, 3 February, 1757; died at Breslau, 15 or 16 June, 1807. He was a Discalced Carmelite, professed at Cologne 18 Oct., 1777. During his studies at Heidelberg, where he graduated, acquired such renown that contrary to the custom of the order he was allowed to accept a professorship in hermeneutics and oriental languages, first at his own alma mater, then at Bonn (1783-1791). In the last-named year he was sent to Strasburg where he also filled the posts of preacher and of rector at the episcopal seminary. Having refused the Constitutional oath he was imprisoned and sentenced to death, but the capital punishment was commuted into one of deportation. It is not quite clear whether this was put into execution; certain it is that with the fall of Robespierre he regained his liberty and returned with shattered health to the convent at Heidelberg (1796). The Margrave of Baden withholding his consent to Dereser's acceptance of the office of coadjutor to the Bishop of Strasburg, he was transferred with the whole university to Freiburg (1807), but having given offence by a funeral sermon (1810) had to leave suddenly for Constance. Thence he went to Lucerne as professor and rector of the seminary, but was expelled on account of his rationalistic teaching, and turned, on invitation, to Breslau as canon and professor (1815). Dereser's combative character got him in trouble everywhere, and, though believing himself a good Catholic, he was imbued with rationalistic, anti- Roman spirit, and with the shallow Rationalism of his time, explaining away everything supernatural in Scripture and religion. All his writings are thus tainted, thought only one, and that without the name of the author, has been placed on the Index, "Commentario biblica in . . . Tu es Petrus" (Bonn, 1789). His principal work, the continuation of Dominic de Brentano's German Bible (Frankfort, 1815-1828, 16 vols.) received permanent value only through the revision by J. M. A. Scholz (1828-1837, 17 vols.). Other works, chiefly Latin, were on the "Necessity of the Knowledge of Oriental Languages for the Study of Scripture" (Cologne, 1783); Hermeneutics of the Old and New Testament (1784 and 1786); Dissertations on the Destruction of Sodom (1784); on St. John Baptist (1785); on the Power and Duties of the Pope according to St. Bernard (1787); on a number of books and portions of the Old Testament with translations (partly metrical) and annotations; on the "Temptation of Christ (1789); on His Divinity and on Pharisaism" (Strasburg, 1791); on the "Foundation of the University of Bonn (1786); a "German Breviary" (Augsburg, 1793, several times reprinted) and a "German Prayer Book (Rottenburg, 1808). He also edited A. Frenzel's Treatise on Matrimony (Breslau, 1818), in which the indissolubility is denied; the author afterwards retracted it.
B. Zimmerman.