OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/21st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 15

Chap. XV.—An Act to authorize the construction of three schooners for the naval service of the United States.
87,360 dollars appropriated.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be, and he is hereby, authorized to cause to be built, equipped, and employed in the naval service of the United States, three schooners, not exceeding twelve guns each; and that the sum of eighty-seven thousand three hundred and sixty dollars be, and the same is hereby, appropriated, out of any moneys in the treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the purpose of carrying the foregoing provisions into effect.
Approved, February 3, 1831.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/21st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 19

Chap. XIX.—An Act to amend the act entitled “An act to quiet the title of certain purchasers of lands between the lines of Ludlow and Roberts, in the state of Ohio,” approved the twenty-sixth of May, in the year eighteen hundred and thirty.
Act of May 26, 1824, ch. 188. Act of May 26, 1830, ch. 105. President of United States to pay the claim of Philip Doddridge.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That in addition to the sum appropriated by the act, entitled “An act to quiet the titles of certain purchasers of lands between the lines of Ludlow and Roberts, in the state of Ohio,” approved the twenty-sixth of May, in the year eighteen hundred and thirty, the President of the United States, be, and he is hereby, authorized to pay, out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Philip Doddridge, the claimant of the Virginia military survey, numbered six thousand nine hundred and twenty-eight, for seven hundred acres, being one of the Virginia military surveys, in the said act mentioned, lying between the lines of Ludlow and Roberts, in the state of Ohio, the sum of one thousand seven hundred and sixty-five dollars and sixty-eight cents, with interest at the rate of six per centum per annum, from the fifth day of March, eighteen hundred and twenty-five, until paid; the said Philip having already conveyed to the United States, the title to the said seven hundred acres of land, in the manner directed by the President of the United States, pursuant to the provisions of the act of Congress before recited. This act shall commence and be in force from the passing thereof.
Approved, February 12, 1831.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/21st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 23

Chap. XXIII.—An Act to amend the act granting “certain relinquished and unappropriated lands to the state of Alabama, for the purpose of improving the navigation of the Tennessee, Coosa, Cahawba, and Blacwarrior rivers,” approved the twenty-third day of May, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-eight.
Act of May 23, 1828, ch. 75. State of Alabama authorized to contract, &c.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That it shall and may be lawful for the state of Alabama, by the board of canal commissioners appointed by her for that purpose, to contract for and construct that part of the canal round the Muscle shoals, beginning at Campbell’s ferry, and running up the river to Lamb’s ferry, before they contract for, or complete that part of the said contemplated canal between Campbell’s ferry and Florence; any thing in the act to which this is an amendment to the contrary notwithstanding.
United States engineers to furnish plan.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That it shall be the duty of the engineers of the United States who have this matter in charge, to furnish to said board of commissioners, as soon as practicable, a plan of that section of the canal above contemplated first to be executed, connecting it with the river at or near to Campbell’s ferry, and at the most eligible point at, or immediately below Lamb’s ferry, on the cheapest practicable plan, in conformity with said original act, to be approved by the President of the United States.
Plan prescribed.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That the section of said canal above Lamb’s ferry, shall, by said engineers, be so planned as to connect it with the deep water in the river at or above Lamb’s ferry; and the section below Campbell’s ferry, in like manner, be connected with the deep water at or below said last-mentioned ferry.
Approved, February 12, 1831.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/21st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 24

Chap. XXIV.—An Act to authorize the transportation of merchandise by land or by water with the benefit of debenture.
The benefit of drawback extended to merchandise which has passed into two districts besides the first. Proviso.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the passage of this act, all goods, wares, or merchandise imported into the United States, the duties on which have been paid, or secured to be paid, may be transported by land, or partly by land, and partly by water, from the district into which they were imported to two other districts, and exported from either of them with the benefit of drawback: Provided, That all regulations and formalities now in force, relating to the transportation of goods, wares, or merchandise, by land or by water, from the district into which they were imported to another district, for the benefit of drawback, and such other regulations as are prescribed under and by virtue of the act to which this is an addition, for the further transportation of such goods, wares, or merchandise, to other districts, shall be complied with:Proviso. And provided also, That all the regulations and formalities now in force, respecting the exportation of goods, wares, and merchandise, for the benefit of drawback, shall be complied with, so far as may be consistent with other provisions of the act to which this is an addition; and the Secretary of the Treasury shall be, and he is hereby, authorized to prescribe the form of the certificate to be used, and the oaths to be taken, on the transportation of such goods, wares, or merchandise, from the second district into which they may be so brought, to the third district.
Approved, February 12, 1831.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/21st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 20

Chap. XX.—An Act to repeal the charges imposed on passports and clearances.
Act of June 1, 1796, ch. 45.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That, so much of the act of the first of June, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-six, entitled “An act providing passports for the ships and vessels of the United States,” as imposes a charge of ten dollars for passports, and of four dollars for a clearance, to any ship or vessel bound on a voyage to any foreign country, be, and the same is hereby repealed, to take effect from and after the thirty-first day of March of the present year.
Approved, February 12, 1831.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/1st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 20

Chap. XX.—An Act for the relief of Thomas Jenkins and Company.
Duties on certain goods lost by fire, remitted.Be it enacted, &c., That the duties, amounting to one hundred and sixty-seven dollars and fifty cents, be remitted on a parcel of hemp, duck, ticklenburg, and molasses, the property of Thomas Jenkins and Company, merchants, of the city of Hudson, in the State of New York, which were lost by fire in the brig Minerva, on her passage from New York to the city of Hudson, her port of delivery: and the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States is hereby authorized and directed to allow a credit on the bond or bonds executed by the said Thomas Jenkins and Company, for payment of the duties on the said goods.
Approved, June 14, 1790.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/1st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 23

Chap. XXIII.—An Act to satisfy the claims of John McCord against the United States.
Payment to John McCord, in full of all claims.Be it enacted, &c., That there be paid to John McCord, out of the duties arising on impost and tonnage, the sum of eight hundred nine dollars seventy-one cents, being the amount of his account against the United States, as settled and admitted by the Auditor and Comptroller of the Treasury, on a bill of exchange dated the fifth of August, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and seventy-six, drawn in Canada for supplies, by General William Thompson, General William Irvine and other officers, in favor of William Pagan, on Messieurs Meredith and Clymer of Philadelphia: And the farther sum of five hundred
​dollars, in full of all his claims and demands against the United States, as well for lands and rations granted by several resolutions of Congress to Canadian sufferers, as on any other account whatsoever.
Approved, July 1, 1790.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/1st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 37

Chap. XXXVII.—An Act for the relief of John Stewart and John Davidson.
Remission of duty on a certain quantity of salt.Be it enacted, &c., That so much of the duties accruing on eighteen hundred bushels of salt, imported in the ship Mercury, into the port of Annapolis, in the state of Maryland, some time in the month of April last, on account of Messieurs John Stewart and John Davidson, as relates to thirteen hundred and twenty-five bushels thereof, which were casually destroyed by a flood on the night of the same day on which the said salt was landed and stored, shall be, and the same are hereby remitted.
Approved, August 4, 1790.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/1st Congress/2nd Session/Resolution 3

The same text appeared as a public resolution in Volume 1 of the Statutes at Large. See United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/1st Congress/2nd Session/Resolution 3. It is reproduced here in the interest of fidelity to the source text of Volume 6.
Resolution No. 3.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled,Compensation of clerks. That the clerks in the office of the commissioner of army accounts are entitled to receive for their services a sum not exceeding five hundred dollars, to be paid in the same manner, and at the same rate, as the salary allowed to the clerks in the Department of Treasury; and that the auditor and comptroller be authorized to adjust the accounts of the clerks in the said office, upon the same principles as those of the treasury department, agreeably to the appropriation by law.
Approved, August 2, 1790.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/2nd Congress/1st Session/Chapter 19

Chap. ⅩⅨ.—An Act for ascertaining the bounds of a tract of land purchased by John Cleves Symmes.
Be it enacted, &c., That the president of the United States be, and he hereby is, authorized,President authorized to alter the contract with John C. Symmes, &c. at the request of John Cleves Symmes, or his agent or agents, to alter the contract, made between the late board of treasury and the said John Cleves Symmes, for the sale of a tract of land of one million of acres, in such manner that the said tract may extend from the mouth of the Great Miami to the mouth of the Little Miami, and be bounded by the river Ohio on the south, by the Great Miami on the west, by the Little Miami on the east, and by a parallel ​of latitude on the north, extending from the Great Miami to the Little Miami, so as to comprehend the proposed quantity of one million of acres: Provided,Not to interfere with Indian boundary, &c. That the northern limits of the said tract shall not interfere with the boundary line established by the treaty of Fort Harmar, between the United States and the Indian nations; And provided, also,Reservation of certain lands. that the President reserve to the United States such lands, at and near Fort Washington, as he may think necessary for the accommodation of a garrison at that fort.
Approved April 12, 1792.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/1st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 24

Chap. XXIV.—An Act for the relief of Nathaniel Twining.
Penalty remitted to N. Twining.Be it enacted, &c., That the penalty, amounting to five hundred and sixty-seven dollars and forty-one cents, incurred by Nathaniel Twining, for a failure in neglecting to transport the mail between Charleston and Savannah, from the month of September, one thousand seven hundred and eighty-seven, until the first of January, one thousand seven hundred and eighty-eight, pursuant to a contract made with the late postmaster-general, shall be, and the same is hereby remitted.
Approved, July 1, 1790.
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 18/Section 208

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 208. Regulations governing Federal licensing
The Secretary of Commerce is authorized to promulgate regulations specifying the terms and conditions upon which any federally owned invention, other than inventions owned by the Tennessee Valley Authority, may be licensed on a nonexclusive, partially exclusive, or exclusive basis.

## Source

(Added Pub. L. 96-517, Sec. 6(a), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3024; amended Pub. L. 98-620, title V, Sec. 501(12), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3367.)

## Amendments
### 1984

Pub. L. 98-620 substituted “Secretary of Commerce” for “Administrator of General Services”.
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 18/Section 200

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 200. Policy and objective
It is the policy and objective of the Congress to use the patent system to promote the utilization of inventions arising from federally supported research or development; to encourage maximum participation of small business firms in federally supported research and development efforts; to promote collaboration between commercial concerns and nonprofit organizations, including universities; to ensure that inventions made by nonprofit organizations and small business firms are used in a manner to promote free competition and enterprise without unduly encumbering future research and discovery; to promote the commercialization and public availability of inventions made in the United States by United States industry and labor; to ensure that the Government obtains sufficient rights in federally supported inventions to meet the needs of the Government and protect the public against nonuse or unreasonable use of inventions; and to minimize the costs of administering policies in this area.

## Source

(Added Pub. L. 96-517, Sec. 6(a), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3018; amended Pub. L. 106-404, Sec. 5, Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1745.)

## Amendments
### 2000

Pub. L. 106-404 substituted “enterprise without unduly encumbering future research and discovery;” for “enterprise;”.

## Effective Date

Chapter effective July 1, 1981, but implementing regulations authorized to be issued earlier, see section 8(f) of Pub. L. 96-517, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 41 of this title.
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 18/Section 204

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 204. Preference for United States industry
Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, no small business firm or nonprofit organization which receives title to any subject invention and no assignee of any such small business firm or nonprofit organization shall grant to any person the exclusive right to use or sell any subject invention in the United States unless such person agrees that any products embodying the subject invention or produced through the use of the subject invention will be manufactured substantially in the United States. However, in individual cases, the requirement for such an agreement may be waived by the Federal agency under whose funding agreement the invention was made upon a showing by the small business firm, nonprofit organization, or assignee that reasonable but unsuccessful efforts have been made to grant licenses on similar terms to potential licensees that would be likely to manufacture substantially in the United States or that under the circumstances domestic manufacture is not commercially feasible.

## Source

(Added Pub. L. 96-517, Sec. 6(a), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3023.)
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 18/Section 206

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 206. Uniform clauses and regulations
The Secretary of Commerce may issue regulations which may be made applicable to Federal agencies implementing the provisions of sections 202 through 204 of this chapter and shall establish standard funding agreement provisions required under this chapter. The regulations and the standard funding agreement shall be subject to public comment before their issuance.

## Source

(Added Pub. L. 96-517, Sec. 6(a), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3023; amended Pub. L. 98-620, title V, Sec. 501(10), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3367.)

## Amendments
### 1984

Pub. L. 98-620 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: “The Office of Federal Procurement Policy, after receiving recommendations of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, may issue regulations which may be made applicable to Federal agencies implementing the provisions of sections 202 through 204 of this chapter and the Office of Federal Procurement Policy shall establish standard funding agreement provisions required under this chapter.”
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 18/Section 205

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 205. Confidentiality
Federal agencies are authorized to withhold from disclosure to the public information disclosing any invention in which the Federal Government owns or may own a right, title, or interest (including a nonexclusive license) for a reasonable time in order for a patent application to be filed. Furthermore, Federal agencies shall not be required to release copies of any document which is part of an application for patent filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office or with any foreign patent office.

## Source

(Added Pub. L. 96-517, Sec. 6(a), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3023.)
# United States v. National Dairy Products Corp./Dissent Black

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Black
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 29
United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.
Argued: Dec. 5, 1962. --- Decided: Feb 18, 1963
Mr. Justice BLACK, with whom Mr. Justice STEWART and Mr. Justice GOLDBERG join, dissenting.
The statute here involved makes it a crime to sell 'goods at unreasonably low prices for the purpose of destroying competition or eliminating a competitor.' 15 U.S.C. § 13a. In United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co., 255 U.S. 81, 41 S.Ct. 298, 65 L.Ed. 516 (1921), this Court held unconstitutional and void for vagueness a statute which made it a crime 'for any person willfully * * * to make any unjust or unreasonable rate or charge' in dealing in or with any necessaries. The rule established by that case has been often followed, is in my judgment sound, and should control this case. Accordingly, I would affirm the District Court's judgment holding the statute invalid. The Court here attempts by interpretation to substitute unambiguous standards for the vague standard of 'unreasonably low prices' used by Congress in the statute. It seems to me that if this criminal statute is to be so drastically reconstructed it should be done by Congress, not by us. Moreover, I agree with the Attorney General's National Committee to Study the Antitrust Laws, which concluded:
'Doubts besetting Section 3's constitutionality seem well founded; no gloss imparted by history or adjudication has settled the vague contours of this harsh criminal law.'

## Notes

* ↑ E.g., Cline v. Frink Dairy Co., 274 U.S. 445, 47 S.Ct. 681, 71 L.Ed. 1146 (1927); Lanzetta v. New Jersey, 306 U.S. 451, 59 S.Ct. 618, 83 L.Ed. 888 (1939); cf. United States v. Cardiff, 344 U.S. 174, 73 S.Ct. 189, 97 L.Ed. 200 (1952)9
* ↑ Atty.Gen.Nat.Comm. Antitrust Rep. 201 (1955) (recommending repeal of § 3).
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. National Lead Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, news, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
332 U.S. 319
United States v. National Lead Company
Argued: Feb. 3, 4, 5, 1947. --- Decided: June 23, 1947
[Statement of Case from pages 319-323 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Wendell Berge, Asst. Atty. Gen., and William C. Dixon, of Cleveland, Ohio, for the United States.
Mr. William Dwight Whitney, of New York City, for the E. I. du Pont Co.
Mr. Bethuel M. Webster, of New York City, for National Lead Co. and Titan Co., Inc.
Mr. Justice BURTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, news, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 29
United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.
Argued: Dec. 5, 1962. --- Decided: Feb 18, 1963
See 372 U.S. 961, 83 S.Ct. 1011.
Daniel M. Friedman, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
John T. Chadwell, Chicago, Ill., for appellees.
Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. National Exchange Bank of Baltimore

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
270 U.S. 527
United States v. National Exchange Bank of Baltimore
Argued: March 16, 1926. --- Decided: April 12, 1926
The Attorney General and Mr. Gardner P. Lloyd, of New York City, for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 528-529 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. G. Ridgely Sappington and Charles G. Baldwin, both of Baltimore, Md., for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 530-532 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse