OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Frank Adams Company v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
375 U.S. 215
Frank Adams Company v. United States
The motion of Henry B. Street for leave to withdraw his appearance as counsel for the appellants is granted. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper/Volume 13

* Number 313, 23 November 1861
* Number 314, 30 November 1861
* Number 315, 7 December 1861
* Number 316, 14 December 1861
* Number 317, 21 December 1861
* Number 318, 28 December 1861
* Number 319, 4 January 1862
* Number 320, 11 January 1862
* Number 321, 18 January 1862
* Number 322, 25 January 1862
* Number 323, 1 February 1862
* Number 324, 8 February 1862
* Number 325, 15 February 1862
* Number 326, 22 February 1862
* Number 327, 1 March 1862
* Number 328, 8 March 1862
* Number 329, 15 March 1862
* Number 330, 15 March 1862
* Number 331, 22 March 1862
* Number 332, 29 March 1862
* Number 333, 5 April 1862
* Number 334, 5 April 1862
* Number 335, 12 April 1862
* Number 336, 19 April 1862
* Number 337, 26 April 1862
* Number 338, 26 April 1862
# Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper/Volume 10

* Number 235, 2 June 1860
* Number 236, 9 June 1860
* Number 237, 9 June 1860
* Number 238, 16 June 1860
* Number 239, 23 June 1860
* Number 240, 30 June 1860
* Number 241, 7 July 1860
* Number 242, 14 July 1860
* Number 243, 21 July 1860
* Number 244, 28 July 1860
* Number 245, 4 August 1860
* Number 246, 11 August 1860
* Number 247, 18 August 1860
* Number 248, 25 August 1860
* Number 249, 1 September 1860
* Number 250, 8 September 1860
* Number 251, 15 September 1860
* Number 252, 22 September 1860
* Number 253, 29 September 1860
* Number 254, 6 October 1860
* Number 255, 13 October 1860
* Number 256, 20 October 1860
* Number 257, 27 October 1860
* Number 258, 3 November 1860
* Number 259, 10 November 1860
* Number 260, 17 November 1860
# Frank Adams Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
375 U.S. 215
Frank Adams Company v. United States
See 376 U.S. 929, 84 S.Ct. 657.
Howard Gould, for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Irwin A. Seibel, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson, for the United States and Interstate Commerce Commission.
F. B. Henderson, Richard J. Murphy, Kemper A. Dobbins, R. B. Claytor and Robert H. Bierma, for appellee rail carriers.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper

* related portals: Periodicals.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper, later renamed Frank Leslie's Weekly, Frank Leslie's Illustrated Weekly, Leslie's Weekly and Leslie's Illustrated Weekly, was an American illustrated literary and news magazine founded in 1855 and published until 1922. It was one of several magazines started by publisher and illustrator Frank Leslie.
* Volume 1
* Volume 2
* Volume 3
* Volume 4
* Volume 5
* Volume 6
* Volume 7
* Volume 8
* Volume 9 (1859–1860)
* Volume 10 (1860)
* Volume 11 (1860–1861)
* Volume 12 (1861)
* Volume 13 (1861–1862)
* Volume 14 (1862)
* Volume 15 (1862–1863)
* Volume 16 (1863)
* Volume 17 (1863)
* Volume 18 (1864)
* Volume 19 (1864–1865)
* Volume 20 (1865)
* Volume 21 (1865–1866)
* Volume 22 (1866)
* Volume 23 (1866–1867)
* Volume 24
* Volume 24
* Volume 25
* Volume 26
* Volume 27
* Volume 28
* Volume 29
* Volume 30
* Volume 31
* Volume 32
* Volume 33
* Volume 34
* Volume 35
* Volume 36
* Volume 37
* Volume 38
* Volume 39
* Volume 40
* Volume 41
* Volume 42
* Volume 43
* Volume 44
* Volume 45
* Volume 46
* Volume 47
* Volume 48
* Volume 49
* Volume 50
* Volume 51
* Volume 52
* Volume 53
* Volume 54
* Volume 55
* Volume 56
* Volume 57
* Volume 58
* Volume 59
* Volume 60
* Volume 61
* Volume 62
* Volume 63
* Volume 64
* Volume 65
* Volume 66
* Volume 67
* Volume 68
* Volume 69
* Volume 70
* Volume 71
* Volume 72
* Volume 73 (1891)
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper/Volume 11

* Number 261, 24 November 1860
* Number 262, 1 December 1860
* Number 263, 8 December 1860
* Number 264, 15 December 1860
* Number 265, 22 December 1860
* Number 266, 29 December 1860
* Number 267, 5 January 1861
* Number 268, 12 January 1861
* Number 269, 19 January 1861
* Number 270, 26 January 1861
* Number 271, 2 February 1861
* Number 272, 9 February 1861
* Number 273, 16 February 1861
* Number 274, 23 February 1861
* Number 275, 2 March 1861
* Number 276, 9 March 1861
* Number 277, 16 March 1861
* Number 278, 23 March 1861
* Number 279, 30 March 1861
* Number 280, 6 April 1861
* Number 281, 13 April 1861
* Number 282, 20 April 1861
* Number 283, 27 April 1861
* Number 284, 30 April 1861
* Number 285, 4 May 1861
* Number 286, 11 May 1861
# Frank Leslie's Illustrated Newspaper/Volume 12

* Number 287, 18 May 1861
* Number 288, 25 May 1861
* Number 289, 1 June 1861
* Number 290, 8 June 1861
* Number 291, 15 June 1861
* Number 292, 22 June 1861
* Number 293, 29 June 1861
* Number 294, 6 July 1861
* Number 295, 13 July 1861
* Number 296, 20 July 1861
* Number 297, 27 July 1861
* Number 298, 3 August 1861
* Number 299, 10 August 1861
* Number 300, 17 August 1861
* Number 301, 24 August 1861
* Number 302, 31 August 1861
* Number 303, 7 September 1861
* Number 304, 14 September 1861
* Number 305, 21 September 1861
* Number 306, 28 September 1861
* Number 307, 5 October 1861
* Number 308, 1861-10-??
* Number 309, 26 October 1861
* Number 310, 2 November 1861
* Number 311, 9 November 1861
* Number 312, 16 November 1861
# French v. Taylor

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
199 U.S. 274
French v. Taylor
Argued: November 8, 1905. --- Decided: November 27, 1905
This was a suit to quiet title to certain real estate, brought in the superior court of King county, Washington, by Sarah Woodward and Sarah Woodward as executrix of Henry S. Woodward, against H. C. Taylor and others. Sarah Woodward resigned her letters as executrix and John H. McGraw was appointed administrator with the will annexed, and thereupon was made a coplaintiff. The superior court entered a decree of dismissal and plaintiffs took the cause by appeal to the supreme court of Washington, which affirmed the judgment. 33 Wash. 1, 73 Pac. 785. A petition for rehearing was filed and denied. 33 Wash. 11, 75 Pac. 646. Henry French was substituted as appellant, and he brought this writ of error.
The case is stated by the supreme court thus:
'Several causes of action are alleged in the complaint. Each cause is to set aside a separate deed to the property in question. It is necessary to notice only the first cause alleged. For some time prior to the year 1891, Sarah Woodward was a nonresident of the state of Washington, and is still such nonresident. She was the owner of lot 8, in block 11, Maynard's plat to the city of Seattle. This property was assessed for general, state, and county taxes for the year 1891, in the name of C. Winehill. It does not appear that the taxing officers knew, when the assessment was made, that the property belonged to Mrs. Woodward. Subsequently the taxes for that year became delinquent, and the property was sold in 1894, under the provisions of the revenue act of 1893. . . . The county of King became the purchaser. Subsequently the county transferred the certificate of sale to the respondents, who thereafter obtained a tax deed. At the trial of the cause the lower court held that this tax deed conveyed a valid title, and dismissed the action. The points relied upon by appellants to secure a reversal are that the property was not assessed in the name of the owner, that no notice of the sale, or of the expiration of the time of redemption, or of the application for a deed, was given to the owner, and that, therefore the respondents acquired no title to the land by virtue of the sale and tax deed.'
Mr. Twyman O. Abbott for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Richard Saxe Jones, Jefferson Chandler, and William H. Brinker for defendants in error.
Statement by Mr. Chief Justice Fuller: Mr. Chief Justice Fuller delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# French v. Wade

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
102 U.S. 132
French v. Wade
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana.
This was a suit brought March 14, 1878, against Joseph M. French, by the heirs-at-law of Henry F. Wade, Jr., to recover the possession of certain real estate in the city of New Orleans.
Wade was the owner of the property when it was seized and a libel for its condemnation filed in the proper District Court of the United States, under the act of July 17, 1862 (12 Stat. 589), commonly called the Confiscation Acts, and the joint resolution of even date therewith. Id. 627. It was condemned May 6, 1865, as forfeited to the United States, and sold under a writ of venditioni exponas, Oct. 21, 1865. Wade was the purchaser, and he and his wife, by an authentic act passed before S. Magner, notary public, on the thirtieth day of that month, bargained and sold it in fee, with all legal warranties, to French. The latter took possession of it and made valuable improvements.
The act recites that the property was acquired by Wade 'at a sale made by the marshal of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana, by virtue of a writ of venditioni exponas to him directed by the District Court of the United States for that district, in the suit entitled. The United States v. One Piece of Ground, & c., the property of Henry F. Wade, Jr., No. 7969 of the docket of said court, as per deed of said marshal, dated the 24th of October, 1865, recorded in the clerk's office of said court in sales-book B, folios 340 and 341, hereto annexed as part hereof; said property belonged to said Wade, Jr., defendant in said suit, for having acquired the same by donation from his father, Henry F. Wade, and his mother, Lucretia Martin, by act passed before Theodore Guyole, late notary, on the 17th of May, 1860, and the same belonged to said donor and his wife, as community property.' Wade died Feb. 24, 1874.
Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, and French sued out this writ of error.
Mr. Benjamin F. Jonas for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. John A. Campbell, contra.
Mr. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Frenzer v. Wallace/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
201 U.S. 244
Frenzer v. Wallace
These are separate appeals by other stockholders from the same decree, and present no questions other than those considered in the former opinion, and the same decrees of affirmance will be entered.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Frenzied Fiction

FRENZIED FICTION
BY THE SAME AUTHOR
LITERARY LAPSES
NONSENSE NOVELS
SUNSHINE SKETCHES OF A LITTLE TOWN
BEHIND THE BEYOND
ARCADIAN ADVENTURES WITH THE IDLE RICH
MOONBEAMS FROM THE LARGER LUNACY
ESSAYS AND LITERARY STUDIES
FURTHER FOOLISHNESS
THE HOHENZOLLERNS IN AMERICA
THE BODLEY HEAD
Frenzied Fiction
By Stephen Leacock
London: John Lane, The Bodley Head
New York: John Lane Company, MCMXIX
Fourth Edition
William Brendon and Son Ltd., Printers, Plymouth, England.
CONTENTS
Frenzied Fiction
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1944, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 79 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# French v. Wade/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
102 U.S. 132
French v. Wade
We think the court below was right in holding that this case was governed by that of Wallach et al. v. Van Riswick (92 U.S. 202), in which we decided that after a seizure and an adjudicated condemnation and sale under the Confiscation Act of July 17, 1862 (12 Stat. 589), of the lands of one engaged in rebellion against the United States, there was 'left in him no estate or interest of any description which he could convey by deed, and no power which he could exercise in favor of another' (p. 208), and that the joint resolution passed contemporaneously with the approval of the act was 'intended for the benefit of his heirs exclusively, to enable them to take the inheritance after his death.' p. 213. As to him, the forfeiture was complete and absolute; but the ownership after his death was in no wise affected (p. 209), except by placing it beyond his control while living. This case has been followed many times since. Pike v. Wassell, 94 U.S. 711. It must now be considered as the settled rule of decision in this court.
Wade, by the purchase of his own interest in the property, took the property to hold during his life, the same as any other purchaser. Whatever rights another could have acquired by the purchase, he got, but no more. Another could not, after purchase, have sold and conveyed the interest of the heirs in the property; neither can he. By the condemnation and sale, Wade's estate was separated entirely from that of his heirs after his death, and the heirs are not estopped by his warranty from asserting their title.
As the cause was tried below on the question of title only, and there are no findings in respect to the improvements pur on the property by French, we cannot consider whether any allowances should be made to him on that account or not.
Judgment affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Frenzer v. Wallace

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
201 U.S. 244
Frenzer v. Wallace
Mr. Westel W. Morsman and Howard B. Smith for appellants in No. 192, and Mr. Westel W. Morsman for appellant in No. 193.
Messrs. Richard S. Horton and Charles Battelle for appellants in No. 195.
Messrs. James M. Woolworth and R. S. Hall for appellees.
Per Mr. Justice Brewer:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fugitive Poetry. 1600–1878/O God, who metest in Thine Hand

O God, Who Metest in Thine Hand.
O God, who metest in Thine hand The waters of the mighty sea, And barrest ocean with the sand, By Thy perpetual decree;
What time the floods lift up their voice, And break in anger on the shore, When deep to deep calls with the noise Of waterspouts and billows' roar;
When they who to the sea go down, And in the waters ply their toil, Are lifted on the surge's crown, And plunged where seething eddies boil;
"Rule then, O Lord, the ocean's wrath, And bind the tempest with Thy will; Tread, as of old, the water's path, And speak Thy bidding, "Peace, be still!"
So with Thy mercies ever new Thy servants set from peril free, And bring them,—Pilot wise and true,— Unto the port where they would be.
# Fugitive Poetry. 1600–1878/On John Underwood

On John Underwood.
Ah, cruel Death! that dost no good, With thy destructive maggots, Now thou hast cut down Underwood, What shall we do for faggots?
# Fugitive Poetry. 1600–1878/On Seeing a Fly Burned in a Lamp

On Seeing a Fly Burned in a Lamp.
See how around the glowing flame The giddy insect flies, Till, fluttering on with fatal aim, It drops, at last it dies.
Just so, in pleasure's sultry maze, The victim courts his doom; Awhile he wantons in the blaze, Then sinks into the tomb.
# Fugitive Poetry. 1600–1878/Omnipresence

Omnipresence.
There is an unseen Power around, Existing in the silent air; Where treadeth man, where space is found, Unheard, unknown, that Power is there.
And not when bright and busy day Is round us with its crowds and cares, And not when night, with solemn sway, Bids awe-hushed souls breathe forth in prayers;
Not when on sickness' weary couch, He writhes with pain's deep, long-drawn groan, Not when his steps in freedom touch The fresh green turf—is man alone.
In proud Belshazzar's gilded hall, 'Mid music, lights, and revelry, That Present Spirit looked on all, From crouching slave to royalty.
When sinks the pious Christian's soul, And scenes of horror daunt his eye, He hears it whispered through the air "A Power of Mercy still is nigh."
The Power that watches, guides, defends Till man becomes a lifeless sod, Till earth is nought—nought, earthly friends— That omnipresent Power—is God.
# Fugitive Poetry. 1600–1878/Omnipresence of God

Omnipresence of God.
Above—below—where'er I gaze, Thy guiding finger, Lord, I view, Traced in the midnight planets' blaze, Or glistening in the morning dew; Whate'er is beautiful or fair, Is but Thine own reflection there.
I hear Thee in the stormy wind, That turns the ocean wave to foam; Nor less Thy wondrous power I find, When summer airs around me roam; The tempest and the calm declare Thyself, for Thou art everywhere.
I find Thee in the depth of night, And read Thy Name in every star
That drinks its splendour from the light That flows from mercy's beaming car; Thy footstool, Lord, each starry gem Composes—not Thy diadem.
And when the radiant orb of light Hath tipped the mountain-tops with gold; Smote with the blaze, my weary sight Shrinks from the wonders I behold; That ray of glory, bright and fair, Is but Thy living shadow there.
Thine is the silent gloom of night, The twilight eve—the dewy mom; Whate'er is beautiful and bright, Thine hands have fashioned to adorn. Thy glory walks in every sphere, And all things whisper, "God is here!"
# Fugitive Poetry. 1600–1878/On Content

On Content.
It is not youth can give content, Nor is it wealth's decree; It is a gift from heaven sent, Though not to thee or me. It is not in the monarch's crown, Though he'd give millions for't; It dwells not in his Lordship's frown, Or waits on him to Court. It is not in a coach and six, It is not in a garter; 'Tis not in love, or politics, But 'tis in Hodge the carter.
# Fugitive Poetry. 1600–1878/Natural and Descriptive

Natural and Descriptive.
Who can paint Like Nature? Can Imagination "boast Amid its gay creation, hues like hers? Or can it mix them with that matchless skill, And lose them in each other, as appears In every bud that blows.
Thomson.
There is a lesson in each flower, A story in each stream and bower; On every herb o'er which we tread Are written words which, rightly read, Will lead us from earth's fragrant sod, To hope, and holiness, and God!
Allan Cunningham.
Not a flower But shows some touch, in freckle, streak, or stain, Of His unrivalled pencil. He inspires Their balmy odours, and imparts their hues, And bathes their eyes with nectar, and includes In grains as countless as the sea-side sands, The forms with which he sprinkles all the earth. Happy who walks with Him! whom what he finds Of flavour or of scent in fruit or flower, Or what he views of beautiful or grand In Nature, from the broad majestic oak To the green blade that twinkles in the sun, Prompts with remembrance of a present God.
Cowper.
In the vast, and the minute, we see The unambiguous footsteps of the God Who gives its lustre to an insect's wing, And wheels His throne upon the rolling worlds.
Ibid.
Oh, how canst thou renounce the boundless store Of charms, which Nature to her vot'ry yields; The warbling woodland, the resounding shore, The pomp of groves, and garniture of fields; All that the genial ray of morning gilds, And all that echoes to the song of even; All that the mountain's sheltering bosom shields, And all the dread magnificence of heaven; Oh, how canst thou renounce, and hope to be forgiven.
Beattie.
These are Thy glorious works, Parent of Good, Almighty, Thine this universal frame, Thus wondrous fair: Thyself how wondrous then! Unspeakable, who sitt'st above these heavens, To us invisible, or dimly seen In these Thy lowest works; yet these declare Thy goodness beyond thought, and power divine.
Milton.
Studies in Nature lead us to cherish the idea of a God, who created, who regenerates, who preserves this universe by invariable laws, and by a continued chain of similar causes, producing similar effects; who pervades all Nature with His Divine Spirit, as a universal Soul, which moves, directs, and restrains the fabric of this world. The blissful idea of a God sweetens every moment of our time, and embellishes before us the paths of life; invites us delightfully to all the beauties of Nature, and associates us with everything that lives or moves. Yes, the whisper of the gales, the murmur of waters, the peaceful agitation of trees or shrubs, would concur to engage our minds, and affect our souls with tenderness, if our thoughts were elevated to one Universal Cause, if we recognised on all sides the works of Him whom we love, if we marked the traces of His august steps and benignant intentions, if we believed ourselves actually present at the display of his boundless power, and the magnificent exertions of His unlimited goodness.
M. Neker, in Bucke's Harmonies and Sublimities of Nature.
# Fugitive Poetry. 1600–1878/Occasioned by the Words "One Prior" in Burnet's History

Occasioned by the Words "One Prior" in Burnet's History.
One Prior!—and is this, this all the fame The poet from the historian can claim? No; Prior's verse posterity shall quote, When 'tis forgot one Burnet ever wrote.
# Fugitive Poetry. 1600–1878/On God's Omnipotence

On God's Omnipotence.
When Egypt's host God's chosen tribe pursued, In crystal walls the admiring waters stood; When through the dreary wastes they took their way, The rocks relented, and poured forth a sea! What limit can the Almighty goodness know, Since seas can harden, and since rocks can flow?
# Fugitive Poetry. 1600–1878/On John Sullen

On John Sullen.
Here lies John Sullen, and it is God's will, He that was Sullen should be Sullen still; He still is Sullen, if the truth ye seek, Knock until doomsday, Sullen will not speak.
# Federal Trade Commission v. Millers' National Federation/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
274 U.S. 743
Federal Trade Commission v. Millers' National Federation
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia denied.

## Notes

* ↑ Case pending and undetermined in court below.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse