OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Michael Egan

From volume 5 of the work.
Egan, Michael, first Bishop of Philadelphia, U.S.A., b. in Ireland, most probably in Galway, in 1761; d. at Philadelphia, July 22, 1814. Entering the Order of St. Francis he was rapidly advanced to important offices. In his twenty-sixth year he was appointed Guardian of St. Isidore's, the house of the Irish Franciscans, at Rome, and held this position for three years, when he was transferred to Ireland. After laboring for several years as a missionary in his native land, he responded to an earnest appeal of the Catholics of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, and went to the United States. Though lacking the constitution demanded by the pastoral duties of that pioneer age, and suffering often from sickness, Father Egan's priestly zeal and his eloquence in the pulpit gained universal recognition, and, in April, 1803, he was appointed by Bishop Carroll one of the pastors of St. Mary's church in Philadelphia. On April 8, 1808, Pope Pius VII erected this city into an episcopal see, with Michael Egan as first bishop. Archbishop Carroll describes him to the Roman authorities as "a man of about fifty who seems endowed with all the qualities to discharge with perfection all the functions of the episcopacy, except that he lacks robust health, greater experience and a greater degree of firmness in his disposition. He is a learned, modest, humble priest who maintains the spirit of his Order in his whole conduct." Owing to the Napoleonic troubles, the papal Bulls did not reach America until the year 1810. On October 28 Bishop Egan was consecrated by Archbishop Carroll in St. Peter's church, Baltimore. His brief episcopate was embittered and his health shattered by the contumacious behavior of the lay trustees of St. Mary's church, which he had chosen for his cathedral. These trustees, who were tainted with the irreligious notions of the times, without any legal right, and contrary to the canons of the Church, claimed the privilege of electing and deposing their pastors and of adjusting their salaries. This un-Catholic contention that "the laity own the churches and the clergy are their hired servants" disturbed the peace, retarded the progress, and threatened the existence of the Catholic religion in Pennsylvania during two episcopates. Bishop Egan's troubles were aggravated by the insubordination of two Irish priests whom he had admitted to the diocese, James Harold and his better-known nephew, William Vincent Harold. Bishop Egan died worn out by his struggles to maintain his episcopal authority.
JAMES F. LOUGHLIN
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Michael Joseph Quin

From volume 12 of the work.
Originator of the "Dublin Review", born at Thurles, Co. Tipperary, Ireland, 1796; died at Boulogne-sur-Mer, 19 Feb., 1843. Coming to London he was called to the Bar at Lincoln's Inn and while waiting for practice devoted himself to journalism. For the "Morning Herald" he wrote an account of his experiences in Spain during the latter part of 1822 and the first four months of 1823. This he published in book-form as "A Visit to Spain" (1823). In the following year he issued two translations, "Memoirs of Ferdinand VII" and "A Statement of some of the principal events in the public life of Don Agustín de Iturbide". He became editor of the "Monthly Review" in 1825 and held that post for seven years. During this period he contributed many articles on foreign policy to the "Morning Chronicle", and edited "The Catholic Journal", a weekly newspaper which ran for one year only. Further travels in Hungary, Wallachia, Servia, and Turkey furnished him with material for a new book in 1835, called "A Steam Voyage down the Danube", which was so successful that it was translated into French and German. But his most lasting work was the "Dublin Review", which has ever since remained the leading Catholic periodical in the British Isles. Of its first beginnings Cardinal Wiseman wrote: "It was in 1836 that the idea of commencing a Catholic Quarterly was first conceived by the late learned and excellent Mr. Quin, who applied to the illustrious O'Connell and myself to join in the undertaking". Quin became the editor and chief contributor, writing five articles in the first number and four in the second. But the enterprise was not remunerative. After two numbers he resigned the editorship, being unable to devote so much time and trouble without financial advantage, but continued to contribute articles to succeeding issues. During 1842 he edited "The Tablet", pending the disputes between Lucas and the publishers. His remaining works are: "The Trade of Banking in England" (1833); a pamphlet on the proposed abolition of local probate courts (1834); "Nourmahal, an Oriental Romance" (1838); "Petra", translated from the French (1839), and "Steam Voyages on the Seine, the Moselle and the Rhine" (1843). He married a daughter of Edward Wallis of Burton Grange, York, and had three daughters by her.
GILLOW, Bibl. Dict. Eng. Cath., s. v.; COOPER in Dict. Nat. Biog., s. v.; RUSSELL in Irish Monthly, XXI, 80; CASARTELLI in Dublin Review (April, 1896), 250 sqq.
EDWIN BURTON
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Michael John Brenan

* related authors: Michael John Brenan.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
From volume 2 of the work.
An ecclesiastical historian, born in Kilkenny, Ireland, in 1780; died at Dublin, February, 1847. He was the son of a stonemason and after his ordination to the priesthood, speedily obtained reputation as a preacher, but, owing to his vanity and pride, came into collision with his bishop, and was suspended. He then left the Church, became a Protestant, and was taken up by the Priests' Protection Society under whose auspices he was announced to preach in St. George's Church, Dublin. In the meantime he reconsidered his position and repented of his folly. He resolved to make public reparation for his fault, and on the Sunday in 1809, when he was announced to commence his campaign against the Church, he ascended the pulpit of St. George's, began by blessing himself most reverently, and then to the relief of his audience took up the Bible, and said "This is the Word of God". After a brief pause, he added deliberately and earnestly, "And I swear by its contents that every word I have uttered against the Catholic Church is a lie", and at once left the building. He went to a neighbouring Capuchin friary, explained what had happened, and begged to be admitted into the order. After some time, his prayers were granted, and he became a Franciscan at Wexford where in later years he wrote (as a penance, it is said) his valuable "Ecclesiastical History of Ireland" (2 vols., Dublin, 1840, revised ed., 1864).
HOGAN, History of Kilkenny (pulpit incident reproduced in Ossory Archoelogical Society Journal, 1879), 423-425; Mirror files (Waterford, 7 November, 1809).
D. J. O'DONOGHUE
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Michael O'Loghlen

From volume 11 of the work.
Born at Ennis, Co. Clare, Ireland, in 1789; died 1846. Educated at Ennis Academy, and Trinity College, Dublin, he was called to the Irish Bar in 1811. By force of ability he won a position as a brilliant pleader. His first real success was as a substitute for O'Connell on the day of the memorable duel between O'Connell and D'Esterre (1815); from 1820 to 1830 many cases came from O'Connell through whose influence O'Loghlen was appointed solicitor general for Ireland in 1834, the first Catholic since James II. He was also elected M.P. for Dungarvan, and when Perrin was elevated to the Bench in 1835, he was made attorney general. A year later he succeeded Sir William Cusack Smith as baron of the exchequer — the first Catholic judge for almost one hundred and fifty years. Finally, in 1837, on the death of Sir William MacMahon he was given the Irish mastership of the rolls, which he held till his death. As master of the rolls he effected many legal reforms.
O'FLANAGAN, Recollections of the Irish Bar (Dublin, 1870).
W. H. Grattan-Flood.
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Michael George Mulhall

From volume 10 of the work.
Statistician, b. in Dublin, 29 September, 1829; d. there 13 Dec., 1900. He was educated at the Irish College, Rome. Going to Bue=F1os Aires he established there in 1861 the "Standard", the first paper in English published in South America. In 1869 he brought out "The Handbook of the River Plate", the first English book printed in Argentina. This was followed by his "Progress of the World" (1880); "Balance Sheet of the World, 1873-1880" (1881); "Dictionary of Statistics" (1883), a standard work of reference, few modern compilations having been more extensively used; "History of Prices since 1850" (1885). In 1896 he travelled extensively in Europe collecting material for the Committee of the English Parliament reporting on a proposed department of agriculture for Ireland. The pope decorated him in recognition of his literary work, in which his wife, Marion McMurrough Mulhall, who has also written extensively, was his active and practical assistant.
Tablet (London, 22 Dec., 1900).
THOMAS F. MEEHAN
# Chiles v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
218 U.S. 71
Chiles v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company
Argued: April 18, 1910. --- Decided: May 31, 1910
Messrs. J. Alexander Chiles, in propria persona, Albert S. White, W. L. Ricks, and B. E. Smith for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. John T. Shelby, Henry T. Wickham, and Henry Taylor, Jr., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chilton v. Braiden's Administratrix/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
67 U.S. 458
Chilton v. Braiden's Administratrix
When one person has got the estate of another, he ought not, in conscience, to be allowed to keep it without paying the consideration. It is on this principle that Courts of Equity proceed as between vendor and vendee. The purchase money is treated as a lien on the land sold, where the vendor has taken no separate security. In the present case this lien has not been defeated by alienation to a bona fide purchaser, or any subsequent lien of creditors. The issue taken in the answer concerning the respondents' ability to pay out of her separate estate is wholly immaterial except to give probability to the allegation that she had paid the consideration. The only defense taken in the answer to the claim of the bill is an alleged receipt in full or discharge for the purchase money.
The deed does not acknowledge the payment of the consideration, and the answer admits that no consideration was paid at the time of its delivery. The issue between the parties turned wholly on the genuineness of a receipt or discharge purporting to have been executed and delivered by Elizabeth Braiden on the 12th of September, 1856. The Court ordered an issue to try this question at law, and the jury found 'That Elizabeth Braiden did not execute and deliver said receipt or discharge, and that it was not the genuine receipt of said Elizabeth Braiden.' The Court, in the exercise of their discretion, refused to grant a new trial of this issue. As it appears to us that the evidence justified the verdict, we see no error in the decree of the Court. It did not condemn the defendant to pay the consideration out of her separate estate, but orders the houses to be sold to pay the purchase money, unless before a certain time the defendant shall pay the amount due.
Neither the answer of the party, nor the argument of counsel, allege any good reason, why a married woman should be permitted to take property without paying for it, more than another. The disabilities thrown round her by the law, are for her protection not to enable her to commit fraud.
Decree affirmed, with costs.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chimes

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Chimes."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Chimes", a poem by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
* "Chimes", a poem by Alice Meynell
* "Chimes" in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1st ed. (1771)
# Chimel v. California

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969), is a Supreme Court of the United States case handed down in 1969. In the case, the Court held that police officers arresting a person in their home could not search the entire home without a search warrant, although they can search the area within immediate reach of the person. The rule relating to searches incident to a lawful arrest established in this case is known as the Chimel rule. ⋅ Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Concurring Opinion

    Harlan

## Dissenting Opinion

    White
United States Supreme Court
395 U.S. 752
Ted Steven CHIMEL, Petitioner, v. State of CALIFORNIA.
Argued: March 27, 1969. --- Decided: June 23, 1969
Rehearing Denied Oct. 13, 1969.%tcSee 90 S.Ct. 36.%tc Keith C. Monroe, Santa Ana, Cal., for petitioner.
Ronald M. George, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
Mr. Justice STEWART delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chimel v. California/Concurrence Harlan

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Harlan
* Dissenting Opinion White
* Wikipedia article
United States Supreme Court
395 U.S. 752
Ted Steven CHIMEL, Petitioner, v. State of CALIFORNIA.
Argued: March 27, 1969. --- Decided: June 23, 1969
Mr. Justice HARLAN, concurring.
I join the Court's opinion with these remarks concerning a factor to which the Court has not alluded.
The only thing that has given me pause in voting to overrule Harris and Rabinowitz is that as a result of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), and Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23, 83 S.Ct. 1623, 10 L.Ed.2d 726 (1963), every change in Fourth Amendment law must now be obeyed by state officials facing widely different problems of local law enforcement. We simply do not know the extent to which cities and towns across the Nation are prepared to administer the greatly expanded warrant system which will be required by today's decision; nor can we say with assurance that in each and every local situation, the warrant requirement plays an essential role in the protection of those fundamental liberties protected against state infringement by the Fourteenth Amendment.
Thus, one is now faced with the dilemma, envisioned in my separate opinion in Ker, 374 U.S., at 45-46, 83 S.Ct., at 1646, of choosing between vindicating sound Fourth Amendment principles at the possible expense of state concerns, long recognized to be consonant with the Fourteenth Amendment before Mapp and Ker came on the books, or diluting the Federal Bill of Rights in the interest of leaving the States at least some elbow room in their methods of criminal law enforcement. No comparable dilemma exists, of course, with respect to the impact of today's decision within the federal system itself.
This federal-state factor has not been an easy one for me to resolve, but in the last analysis I cannot in good conscience vote to perpetuate bad Fourth Amendment law.
I add only that this case, together with Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784, 89 S.Ct. 2056, 23 L.Ed.2d 707; North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2089, 23 L.Ed.2d 656, and Simpson v. Rice, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656, all dc ided today, serve to point up, as few other cases have, the profound changes that the 'incorporation doctrine' has wrought both in the workings of our federal system and upon the adjudicative processes of this Court.
Mr. Justice WHITE, with whom Mr. Justice BLACK joins, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Code of Federal Regulations/Title 42

From the U.S. Government Printing Office, revised as of October 1, 2003.
* Chapter I. Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services (Parts 1–199)
* Chapter II-III. Reserved. (Parts 200–399)
* Chapter IV. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services (Parts 400-413)
** Chapter IV. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services (Parts 414–429)
** Chapter IV. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services (Parts 430–481)
** Chapter IV. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services (Parts 430–481)
** Chapter IV. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services (Parts 482–699)
* Chapter V. Office of Inspector General-HHS, Department of Health and Human Services (Parts 1000-1099)

## Historical

* 1940 edition of the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 42
# Code of Federal Regulations/Title 42/Chapter I

From the U.S. Government Printing Office on GovInfo, revised as of October 1, 2003. (Commons file)
* Part 1 Reserved
* Part 2. Confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records
** Part 2a. Protection of identity—research subjects
* Part 3 Reserved
* Part 4. National Library of Medicine
* Part 82. Methods for conducting dose reconstruction under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000
* Part 84. Approval of Respiratory Protective Devices - Page 501
* Part 85. Requests for health hazard evaluations
(Incomplete, TBD)
# Code of Federal Regulations/Title 35

From the U.S. Government Printing Office on Google Books, revised as of July 1, 1992. (Commons file)
# Code of Federal Regulations/Title 37

From the U.S. Government Printing Office on GPO Access, revised July 1, 2009.
| Title | Volume | Chapter | Browse Parts | Regulatory Entity | Online as of |
| Title 37 Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights | 1 | I | 1-199 | Patent and Trademark Office, Department of Commerce | 11/4/2009 |
| Title 37 Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights | 1 | II | 200-299 | Copyright Office, Library of Congress | 11/4/2009 |
| Title 37 Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights | 1 | III | 300-399 | Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress | 11/4/2009 |
| Title 37 Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights | 1 | IV | 400-499 | Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy, Department of Commerce | 11/4/2009 |
| Title 37 Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights | 1 | V | 500-599 | Under Secretary for Technology, Department of Commerce | 11/4/2009 |
# Code of Federal Regulations/Title 40

From the U.S. Government Printing Office on GPO Access
* I. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
* IV. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
* V. COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
* VI. CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD
* VII. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; UNIFORM NATIONAL DISCHARGE STANDARDS FOR VESSELS OF THE ARMED FORCES
# Code of Federal Regulations/Title 42/1940

From the U.S. Government Printing Office on Google Books, revised as of 1940. (Commons file)
* Chapter I. United States Public Health Service, Department of the Treasury
* Chapter II. United States Children's Bureau, Department of Labor
* Chapter III. St. Elizabeth's Hospital, Department of the Interior
* Chapter IV. Freedman's Hospital
# Code of Federal Regulations/Title 37/Chapter II

From the U.S. Government Printing Office on GPO Access, retrieved July 1, 2009.
* SUBCHAPTER A − COPYRIGHT OFFICE AND PROCEDURES
** 201 − General provisions
** 202 − Preregistration and registration of claims to copyright
** 203 − Freedom of Information Act: Policies and procedures
** 204 − Privacy Act: Policies and procedures
** 205 − Legal processes
** 211 − Mask work protection
** 212 − Protection of vessel hull designs
* SUBCHAPTER B − COPYRIGHT ARBITRATION ROYALTY PANEL RULES AND PROCEDURES
** 251 − Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel rules of procedure
** 253 − Use of certain copyrighted works in connection with noncommercial educational broadcasting
** 254 − Adjustment of royalty rate for coin-operated phonorecord players
** 255 − Adjustment of royalty payable under compulsory license for making and distributing phonorecords
** 256 − Adjustment of royalty fee for cable compulsory license
** 258 − Adjustment of royalty fee for secondary transmissions by satellite carriers
** 260 − Rates and terms for preexisting subscription services' digital transmissions of sound recordings and making of ephemeral phonorecords
** 261 − Rates and terms for eligible nonsubscription transmissions and the making of ephemeral reproductions
** 262 − Rates and terms for certain eligible nonsubscription transmissions, new subscription services and the making of ephemeral reproductions
** 263 − Rates and terms for certain transmissions and the making of ephemeral reproductions by noncommercial licensees
** 270 − Notice and recordkeeping requirements for statutory licenses
# Civil Aeronautics Board v. Hermann

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
353 U.S. 322
Civil Aeronautics Board v. Hermann
Argued: April 25, 1957. --- Decided: May 6, 1957
See 354 U.S. 927, 77 S.Ct. 1376.
Solicitor General J. Lee Rankin, Washington, D.C., for the petitioner.
Mr. Roland E. Ginsburg, Los Angeles, Cal., for the respondents.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Civil Air Regulations

rules that prescribed civil aviation within the United States prior to 1958. They were created and updated by several US federal aviation agencies, including the Bureau of Air Commerce and the Civil Aeronautics Board.
* Part 00—Aircraft Registration Certificate
** Part 00, effective 1 November 1937
* Part 40—Air Carrier Operating Certification
** Part 40, effective 1 November 1942
** Part 40, effective 10 July 1946
** Amendment 40-1 (1943)
** Amendment 40-1 (1947)
* Part 99—Mode of Citation of Regulations
** Part 99, effective 15 November 1940
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse