OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Reports/Volume 373

* 373 U.S. 1 (1963) Sanders v. United States
* 373 U.S. 33 (1963) Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company
* 373 U.S. 49 (1963) Maximov v. United States
* 373 U.S. 57 (1963) Hawaii v. Gordon
* 373 U.S. 59 (1963) White v. Maryland
* 373 U.S. 61 (1963) Johnson v. Virginia
* 373 U.S. 64 (1963) Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Company v. Reily
* 373 U.S. 83 (1963) Brady v. Maryland
* 373 U.S. 96 (1963) Willner v. Committee on Character and Fitness
* 373 U.S. 113 (1963) Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes v. Allen
* 373 U.S. 132 (1963) Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul
* 373 U.S. 179 (1963) Namet v. United States
* 373 U.S. 193 (1963) Whipple v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
* 373 U.S. 206 (1963) Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp.
* 373 U.S. 221 (1963) National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corporation
* 373 U.S. 238 (1963) Smith v. Mississippi
* 373 U.S. 244 (1963) Peterson v. City of Greenville
* 373 U.S. 262 (1963) Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham
* 373 U.S. 267 (1963) Lombard v. Louisiana
* 373 U.S. 284 (1963) Wright v. Georgia
* 373 U.S. 294 (1963) Wisconsin v. Federal Power Commission
* 373 U.S. 334 (1963) Andrews v. United States
* 373 U.S. 341 (1963) Silver v. New York Stock Exchange
* 373 U.S. 372 (1963) Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Boston & Maine Railroad Maryland Port Authority
* 373 U.S. 374 (1963) Gober v. City of Birmingham
* 373 U.S. 375 (1963) Avent v. North Carolina
* 373 U.S. 378 (1963) Illinois v. United States
* 373 U.S. 379 (1963) Sperry v. Florida
* 373 U.S. 405 (1963) United States v. Braverman
* 373 U.S. 410 (1963) Reed v. Steamship Yaka
* 373 U.S. 420 (1963) Norvell v. Illinois
* 373 U.S. 427 (1963) Lopez v. United States
* 373 U.S. 472 (1963) Boesche v. Udall
* 373 U.S. 487 (1963) Campbell v. United States
* 373 U.S. 503 (1963) Haynes v. Washington
* 373 U.S. 526 (1963) Watson v. City of Memphis
* 373 U.S. 546 (1963) Arizona v. California
* 373 U.S. 647 (1963) Wheeldin v. Wheeler
* 373 U.S. 668 (1963) McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 Cahokia Illinois
* 373 U.S. 683 (1963) Goss v. Board of Education of Knoxville
* 373 U.S. 690 (1963) Local 100 of United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices v. Borden
* 373 U.S. 701 (1963) Local No. 207, International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers Union v. Perko
* 373 U.S. 709 (1963) United States v. Carlo Bianchi and Company
* 373 U.S. 723 (1963) Rideau v. Louisiana
* 373 U.S. 734 (1963) National Labor Relations Board v. General Motors Corporation
* 373 U.S. 746 (1963) Retail Clerks International Association, Local 1625 v. Schermerhorn
* 373 U.S. 758 (1963) Jones v. Healing
* 373 U.S. 934 (1963) Willard Dairy Corporation v. National Dairy Products Corporation
# United States Reports/Volume 370

* 370 U.S. 1 (1962) Enochs v. Williams Packing Navigation Company
* 370 U.S. 9 (1962) National Labor Relations Board v. Washington Aluminum Company
* 370 U.S. 19 (1962) Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Winckler Smith Citrus Products Company
* 370 U.S. 31 (1962) Salem v. United States Lines Company
* 370 U.S. 41 (1962) Beard v. Stahr
* 370 U.S. 46 (1962) Watkins v. City of Wilson
* 370 U.S. 47 (1962) Fass v. New Jersey
* 370 U.S. 48 (1962) Busby v. Harris
* 370 U.S. 49 (1962) Gallegos v. Colorado
* 370 U.S. 65 (1962) United States v. Davis
* 370 U.S. 76 (1962) Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers, Inc. v. United States
* 370 U.S. 114 (1962) Calbeck v. Travelers Insurance Company
* 370 U.S. 139 (1962) Lanza v. New York
* 370 U.S. 154 (1962) Taylor v. Louisiana
* 370 U.S. 158 (1962) Jefferson Lake Sulphur Company v. New Jersey
* 370 U.S. 159 (1962) Porter v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company
* 370 U.S. 165 (1962) Morales v. City of Galveston
* 370 U.S. 173 (1962) Marine Engineers Beneficial Association v. Interlake Steamship Company
* 370 U.S. 190 (1962) W.M.C.A., Inc. v. Simon
* 370 U.S. 195 (1962) Sinclair Refining Company v. Atkinson
* 370 U.S. 230 (1962) In re McConnell
* 370 U.S. 238 (1962) Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Company
* 370 U.S. 254 (1962) Drake Bakeries Incorporated v. Local 50 American Bakery & Confectionery Workers International AFL-CIO
* 370 U.S. 269 (1962) Rudolph v. United States
* 370 U.S. 288 (1962) Grumman v. United States
* 370 U.S. 292 (1962) Milutin v. Bouchard
* 370 U.S. 293 (1962) Seelig v. United States
* 370 U.S. 294 (1962) Brown Shoe Company v. United States
* 370 U.S. 375 (1962) Wood v. Georgia
* 370 U.S. 405 (1962) United States v. Wise
* 370 U.S. 421 (1962) Engel v. Vitale
* 370 U.S. 451 (1962) State Board of Insurance v. Todd Shipyards Corporation
* 370 U.S. 460 (1962) United States v. Borden Company
* 370 U.S. 478 (1962) MANual Enterprises, Inc. v. Day
* 370 U.S. 530 (1962) Glidden Company v. Zdanok Lurk
* 370 U.S. 607 (1962) Central Railroad Company Of Pennsylvania v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
* 370 U.S. 626 (1962) Link v. Wabash Railroad Company
* 370 U.S. 650 (1962) Gilbert v. United States
* 370 U.S. 660 (1962) Robinson v. California
* 370 U.S. 690 (1962) Continental Ore Company v. Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation
* 370 U.S. 711 (1961) Chauffeurs Teamsters and Helpers Local Union, No. 795 v. Yellow Transit Freight Lines, Inc.
* 370 U.S. 713 (1962) Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corporation v. Epstein
* 370 U.S. 717 (1962) Silber v. United States
* 370 U.S. 722 (1962) Elchuk v. United States
* 370 U.S. 723 (1962) Marakar v. United States
* 370 U.S. 724 (1962) Hartman v. United States
* 370 U.S. 725 (1962) Allen v. Bannan
* 370 U.S. 726 (1962) State of Louisiana ex rel. Washington v. Walker
* 370 U.S. 727 (1962) Gilliam v. United States
* 370 U.S. 728 (1962) Whitus v. Balkcom
* 370 U.S. 907 (1962) Fay v. Noia
* 370 U.S. 940 (1962) Handelsbureau La Mola v. Kennedy
* 370 U.S. 966 (1962) Thomas v. Patterson
# Virginia v. West Virginia (231 U.S. 89)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
231 U.S. 89
Virginia v. West Virginia (231 U.S. 89)
Argued: October 14, 1913. --- Decided: November 10, 1913
Mr. Samuel W. Williams, Attorney General of Virginia, and Messrs. Randolph Harrison, William A. Anderson, and John B. Moon for the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Messrs. Holmes Conrad and Sanford Robinson, for the bondholding creditors.
Mr. A. A. Lilly, Attorney General of West Virginia, and Messrs.
V. B. Archer, Charles E. Hogg, and John H. Holt for the state of West Virginia.
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Virginia v. West Virginia (209 U.S. 514)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
209 U.S. 514
Virginia v. Virginia
Argued: April 9, 10, 1908. --- Decided: May 4, 1908
Messrs. William A. Anderson and Randolph Harrison for complainant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 514-526 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. John C. Spooner, John G. Carlisle, C. W. May, Charles E. Hogg, W. Mollohan, George W. McClintic, and W. G. Matthews for defendant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 526-534 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Holmes Conrad as amicus curice.
Mr. Chief Justice Fuller announced the following order:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Virginia v. West Virginia (222 U.S. 17)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
222 U.S. 17
Virginia v. West Virginia (222 U.S. 17)
Argued: October 10, 1911. --- Decided: October 30, 1911
Mr. Samuel W. Williams, Attorney General of Virginia, for complainant.
Mr. William G. Conley, Attorney General of West Virginia, for defendant.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Virginia v. West Virginia (220 U.S. 1)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
220 U.S. 1
Virginia v. West Virginia (220 U.S. 1)
Argued January 20, 23, 24, 25, and 26, 1911.
Decided March 6, 1911.
[Syllabus from pages 1-3 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Samuel W. Williams, William A. Anderson, Randolph Harrison, and John B. Moon for complainant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 3-10 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Holmes Conrad for the bondholders.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 10-14 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Charles E. Hogg, George W. McClintic, John C. Spooner, W. Mollohan, W. G. Mathews, William M. O. Dawson, and William G. Conley for defendant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 14-22 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Virginia v. West Virginia (234 U.S. 117)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
234 U.S. 117
Virginia v. West Virginia (234 U.S. 117)
Argued: April 16, 17, 1914. --- Decided: June 8, 1914
Mr. A. A. Lilly, Attorney General for West Virginia, and Messrs. John H. Holt, Charles E. Hogg, and V. B. Archer, in support of the motion.
Messrs. William A. Anderson, Randolph Harrison, John B. Moon, and Mr. John Garland Pollard, Attorney General of Virginia, opposed.
Messrs. Sanford Robinson and Holmes Conrad also apposed.
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Vivian Grey/Volume 1/Chapter 2.8

CHAPTER VIII.
THE FIRST WEEK.
The first week at Château Desir, passed pleasantly enough. Vivian's morning was amply occupied in maturing with the Marquess the grand principles of the new political system: in weighing interests, in balancing connections, and settling "what side was to be taken on the great questions?" Oh! politics, thou splendid juggle!—The whole business, although so magnificent in its result, appeared very easy to the two counsellors, for it was one of the first principles of Mr. Vivian Grey, "that every thing was possible." Men did ​fail in life to be sure, and after all, very little was done by the generality; but still all these failures, and all this inefficiency might be traced to a want of physical and mental courage. Some men were bold in their conceptions, and splendid heads at a grand system, but then, when the day of battle came, they turned out very cowards; while others, who had nerve enough to stand the brunt of the hottest fire, were utterly ignorant of military tactics, and fell before the destroyer, like the brave untutored Indians, before the civilized European. Now Vivian Grey was conscious, that there was at least one person in the world, who was no craven either in body or in mind, and so he had long come to the comfortable conclusion, that it was impossible that his career could be any thing, but the most brilliant. And truly, employed as he now was, with a peer of the realm, in a solemn consultation on that realm's most important interests, at a time when ​creatures of his age were moping in Halls and Colleges, is it to be wondered at, that he began to imagine that his theory was borne out by experience, and by fact? Not that it must be supposed, even for a moment, that Vivian Grey was, what the world calls, conceited.—Oh, no! he knew the measure of his own mind, and had fathomed the depth of his powers with equal skill and impartiality; but in the process he could not but feel, that he could conceive much, and dare do more.
I said the first week at Château Desir passed pleasantly enough; and so it did, for Vivian's soul revelled in the morning councils on his future fortunes, with as much eager joy, as a young courser trying the turf, preliminary to running for the plate. And then, in the evening, were moon-lit walks with Mrs. Felix Lorraine! and then the lady abused England so prettily, and initiated her companion in all the secrets of German Courts, and sang beautiful ​French songs, and then she would take him beside the luminous lake in the park, and vow it looked just like the dark blue Rhine! and then she remembered Germany, and grew sad, and abused her husband; and then she taught Vivian the guitar, and—some other fooleries besides.
# Vivian Grey/Volume 1/Chapter 2.3

CHAPTER III.
THE MOTTO.
The intercourse between the Marquess and Vivian, after this interview, was constant. No dinner-party was thought perfect at Carabas House, without the presence of the young gentleman; and as the Marchioness was delighted with the perpetual presence of an individual whom she could always consult about Julie, there was apparently no domestic obstacle to Vivian"'s remaining in high favour.
The Earl of Eglamour, the only child, in whom were concentrated all the hopes of the illustrious House of Lorraine, was in Italy. The ​only remaining member of the domestic circle who was wanting, was the Honourable Mrs. Felix Lorraine, the wife of the Marquess's younger brother. This lady, exhausted by the gaiety of the season, had left town somewhat earlier than she usually did, and was inhaling fresh air, and of course studying botany, at the magnificent seat of the Carabas family, Château Desir, at which splendid place Vivian was to pass the summer.
Mr. Grey watched the movements of his son with an anxious, but apparently with no curious eye. "If the Marquess will give my son a good place, why Master Vivian's new system works rather better than I conceived it would; but how the young knave hath so managed, shall I say? the old fool,—does, I confess, puzzle my philosophy."
Alas! when Mr. Grey jocosely used the phrase, "new system," he was little aware of the workings of his son's mind. But so it is ​in life; a father is, perhaps, the worst judge of his son's capacity. He knows too much—and too little.
In the meantime, as we before stated, all was sunshine with Vivian Grey. His noble friend and himself were in perpetual converse, and constantly engaged in deep consultation. As yet, the world knew nothing, except that, according to the Marquess of Carabas, "Vivian Grey was the most astonishingly clever and prodigiously accomplished fellow that ever breathed." And as the Marquess always added, "resembled himself very much when he was young."
But it must not be supposed, that Vivian was to all the world the fascinating creature that he was to the Marquess of Carabas. Many complained that he was reserved, silent, satirical, and haughty. But the truth was, Vivian Grey often asked himself, "who is to be my enemy to-morrow?" He was too cunning ​a master of the human mind, not to be aware of the quicksands upon which all greenhorns strike;—he knew too well the danger of unnecessary intimacy. A smile for a friend, and a sneer for the world, is the way to govern mankind, and such was the motto of Vivian Grey.
# Vivian Grey/Volume 1/Chapter 2.7

CHAPTER VII.
EARLY RISING.
When Vivian retired to his room, he found a notellette on his dressing-case, which contained two lines. They were as follows:—"A walk on the Terrace before breakfast, is the fashion at Château Desir." The esprit of the note sufficiently indicated the authoress, even if the perfumed paper, and the diminutive French gem, with its piquant and peculiar motto, had allowed him, for an instant, to hesitate.
In spite of his travelling, and his champagne, and his sound sleep, Vivian rose early, and was on the Terrace at a most reasonable hour, ​at least for him: Mrs. Felix Lorraine was already there.
"I congratulate Mr. Grey," said the lady as she extended him a finger, "on being an early riser. Nothing is so vulgar as getting up late, Oh! what a pretty morning gown that is! and how nice your hair curls! and that velvet stock! why I declare you're quite a taste in costume? but it does not set quite right. There, that's better," said Mrs. Lorraine, adjusting the stock for him, "not much beard yet, I see; you must take care to have one before you're a—privy counsellor."
"I rejoice," said Vivian, "that I can in return sincerely compliment you on your own good taste in costume. That buckle is, of course, fresh from Berlin, or—Birmingham—it's all the same, you know, at least at Howell and James's; and of all things in the world, what I most admire, are your black velvet slippers! But, where s the Marquess?"
​"Oh! we 're not very early honoured with the presence of the Marquess of Carabas in his own house."
"Why, what do you mean?"
"Oh! I mean nothing, except that the future minister never rises till noon—bad habits, Mr. Grey, for a man of business!"
"Bad habits, indeed! we must endeavour to cure him, now that he's going, as you say, to be a man of business."
"Oh, certainly! cure him by all means. He 'U give you, I don't doubt, plenty of occupation. I advise you regularly to reform the whole house. Your influence is so great, that you can do any thing with the Marquess. Well, I hope he'll behave better in future, for the Castle will be full in a few days. There are the Courtowns coming, and Sir Berdmore and Lady Scrope, and the Beaconsfields—all next week; and crowds of all sorts of people, whose names I forget, pawns in the great game ​of chess, which is to be played by Vivian Grey, Esq. and the most noble the Marquess of Carabas—against all England. There, there's the breakfast bell; I hope your appetite's good."
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/13th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 62

Chap. LXII.—An Act directing the disposition of money paid into the courts of the United States.
Act of March 3, 1817, ch. 108. Money to be deposited in incorporated banks. Proviso, as to agreement of parties.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That upon the payment of any money into any District of Circuit Court of the United States, to abide the order of the court, the same shall be deposited in such incorporated bank as the court may designate, and there remain till it shall be decided to whom it of right belongs: Provided, That if any judicial district there shall be no incorporated bank, the court may direct such money to be deposited according to its discretion: Provided also, That nothing herein shall be construed to prevent the delivery of any such money upon security, according to agreement of parties, under the direction of the court.
Approved, April 18, 1814.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/13th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 65

Chap. LXV.—An Act granting pensions to the officers and seamen serving on board the revenue cutters in certain cases.
Pensions to officers and seamen on board the revenue cutters in certain cases.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the officers and seamen of the revenue cutters of the United States, who have been or may be wounded or disabled in the discharge of their duty whilst co-operating with the navy by order of the President of the United States, shall be entitled to be place on the navy pension list, at the same rate of pension, and under the same regulations and restrictions as are now provided by law for the officers and seamen of the navy.
Approved, April 18, 1814.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/13th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 73

Chap. LXXIII.—An Act extending relief to certain purchasers of public lands in the Mississippi territory.
Allowance of one year from 1st June, 1814, to purchasers of land of the United States who have been subjected to claimants under Spanish grants for payment of interest.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That any person or persons having purchased lands of the United States, in the Mississippi Territory, who have been subjected to prosecutions by adverse claimants, who derived their titles from a Spanish grant, warrant, or order of survey, and where such prosecutions have terminated favourably to purchasers from the United States, such paymasters shall have one year from the first day of June next, for the payment of any interest that my be due from them to the United States, on the purchases aforesaid.
Approved, April 18, 1814.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/13th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 66

Chap. LXVI.—An Act fixing the time for the next meeting of Congress.
Congress to meet on the last Monday of Oct. 1814.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That after the adjournment of the present session, the next meeting of Congress shall be on the last Monday in October next.
Approved, April 18, 1814.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/13th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 70

Chap. LXX.—An Act authorizing the purchase of the vessels captured on lake Erie.
Purchase authorized.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be, and he is hereby authorized to cause to be purchased the British vessels which were captured on lake Erie by the American squadron, on the tenth day of September, in the year ond thousand eight hundred and thirteen;Appropriation, to be distributed as prize money. and the sum of two hundred and fifty-five thousand dollars, in payment for the said vessels, shall be distributed as prize money among the captors, or their heirs.
Specific appropriations.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That for carrying into effect this act, a sum not exceeding two hundred and fifty-five thousand dollars be, and the same is hereby appropriated, to be paid out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Five thousand dollars in addition to his prize money awarded to Oliver H. Perry.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That there be allowed and paid to Captain Oliver H. Perry, out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated, in addition to his share of prize money, as commander of the ship Lawrence, the sum of five thousand dollars.
Approved, April 18, 1814.
# Von Cleef v. New Jersey

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
395 U.S. 814
Monique VON CLEEF v. NEW JERSEY.
Argued: June 23, 1969. ---
Herald Price Fahringer, for petitioners.
Paul Murphy, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Volunteering in India/Dedication

Layout 2
In Memoriam
DEDICATED TO THE BELOVED MEMORY
OF
GENERAL JOSEPH NASH, C.B.,
A MAN ESTEEMED BY ALL WITH WHOM HE CAME IN CONTACT, AND WHO PASSED A LIFE-LONG MILITARY CAREER IN SERVING HIS COUNTRY WITH RARE DISTINCTION AND HONOUR,
BY
HIS ELDEST SON, THE AUTHOR,
late of the Bengal Yeomanry Cavalry.