OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Diocese of Sovana and Pitigliano

From volume 14 of the work.
DIOCESE OF SOVANA AND PITIGLIANO (SUANENSIS ET PITILIANENSIS).
The two towns, Sovana and Pitigliano, are situated in the Province of Grosseto, Central Italy. Sovana was an ancient Etruscan city, and preserved a certain importance till the end of the thirteenth century, having been from the days of Charlemagne the capital of the counts of Aldobrandeschi, lords of Southern Tuscany. In 1240 the city withstood a siege by Frederick II. Later it passed under the sway of the Orsini, who transferred their residence to Pitigliano, a more salubrious locality, mentioned for the first time in 1081. In 1401 it fell into the power of the Republic of Siena. In 1434 Count Gentile Orsini having been killed at Sovana, the people of Pitigliano put the town to fire and sword, and brought about its complete decay, so that in 1833 it contained only 64 inhabitants.
The territory of this diocese includes the celebrated Vallombrosan Abbey of Monte Calvello, which was transferred in 1496 to within the city limits. St. Gregory VII was born at Sovana. Its first known bishop is Mauritius (680); other bishops were: Raineri (963), who re-introduced common life among the canons; Pier Nicolò Blandinelli (1380), who had the doors of the cathedral made; Apollonio Massaini (1439), under whom the relics of S. Mamiliano, Bishop of Palermo, were translated from the Island of Giglio; Alfonso Petrucci (1498), son of the Tyrant of Siena, later a cardinal, condemned to death by Leo X in 1517; his successor, Lattanzio Petrucci, was accused of high treason and forced to flee, but he was acquitted by Adrian VI; Carvajal Simoncelli (1535) ruled the diocese for sixty-one years; Francesco Pio Santi (1776) resisted the innovations of Leopold and the Synod of Pistoia. For a long time the bishops of Sovana have resided at Pitigliano. In 1844 that city was made an episcopal see and united aeque principaliter to that of Sovana. The diocese is suffragan of Siena, and contains 47 parishes, with 90 secular and 8 regular priests; 2 Franciscan convents, 4 convents of nuns, and 38,500 inhabitants.
CAPPELLETTI, Le Chiese d'Italia (Venice, 1857).
U. BENIGNI
# Children

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Children."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Children", a short story by Anton Chekhov
* "Children", a poem by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
* "Children", a poem by Eliza Jane Stephens

## See also

* Child
# Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009/Title I
## Subtitle A—Funding

    SEC. 101. EXTENSION OF CHIP.
    SEC. 102. ALLOTMENTS FOR STATES AND TERRITORIES FOR FISCAL YEARS 2009 THROUGH 2013.
    SEC. 103. CHILD ENROLLMENT CONTINGENCY FUND.
    SEC. 104. CHIP PERFORMANCE BONUS PAYMENT TO OFFSET ADDITIONAL ENROLLMENT COSTS RESULTING FROM ENROLLMENT AND RETENTION EFFORTS.
    SEC. 105. TWO-YEAR INITIAL AVAILABILITY OF CHIP ALLOTMENTS.
    SEC. 106. REDISTRIBUTION OF UNUSED ALLOTMENTS.
    SEC. 107. OPTION FOR QUALIFYING STATES TO RECEIVE THE ENHANCED PORTION OF THE CHIP MATCHING RATE FOR MEDICAID COVERAGE OF CERTAIN CHILDREN.
    SEC. 108. ONE-TIME APPROPRIATION.
    SEC. 109. IMPROVING FUNDING FOR THE TERRITORIES UNDER CHIP AND MEDICAID.

## Subtitle B—Focus on Low-Income Children and Pregnant Women

    SEC. 111. STATE OPTION TO COVER LOW-INCOME PREGNANT WOMEN UNDER CHIP THROUGH A STATE PLAN AMENDMENT.
    SEC. 112. PHASE-OUT OF COVERAGE FOR NONPREGNANT CHILDLESS ADULTS UNDER CHIP; CONDITIONS FOR COVERAGE OF PARENTS.
    SEC. 113. ELIMINATION OF COUNTING MEDICAID CHILD PRESUMPTIVE ELIGIBILITY COSTS AGAINST TITLE XXI ALLOTMENT.
    SEC. 114. LIMITATION ON MATCHING RATE FOR STATES THAT PROPOSE TO COVER CHILDREN WITH EFFECTIVE FAMILY INCOME THAT EXCEEDS 300 PERCENT OF THE POVERTY LINE.
    SEC. 115. STATE AUTHORITY UNDER MEDICAID.
# Childhood (Victor)

A child of scarcely seven years
* "Childhood" in The Poets and Poetry of the West (1860)
* "Childhood" in The New Penelope (1877)
* "Childhood" in Poems (1900)
# Childhood (Tolstoy)

English-language translations of Детство include:
* Childhood (1904), as translated by Leo Wiener
* Childhood (1912), as translated by C. J. Hogarth
# Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge, 36 U.S. 420 (1837), was a case regarding the Charles River Bridge and the Warren Bridge of Boston, Massachusetts, heard by the United States Supreme Court under the leadership of Chief Justice Roger B. Taney. The case settled a dispute over the constitutional clause regarding obligation of contract. Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
36 U.S. 420
Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Charles Sumner

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Charles Sumner."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Charles Sumner", (1874) a poem by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
* "To Charles Sumner" in Littell's Living Age, 128 (1655) (1874)", another poem by Sumner's friend Henry Wadsworth Longfellow,

### Author

* Charles Sumner, (1811–1874) an American politician, statesman, lawyer and orator
# Charles S. Fairfax's Sine die Address of May 15, 1854

At the commencement of the present year it became my privilege as well as my duty to address you, on the occasion of being elected to preside over this body. Now that the hour has arrived for the final adjournment of this House, before we separate I must be permitted to return to you my thanks, for the kind, generous and forbearing treatment, I have received from the beginning to the end of the session. During the present term of the Legislature we have boon called upon to consider many matters of vital importance and original character ; during these deliberations opposing opinions have often fiercely contended for supremacy in these halls. But the storms soon faded away. Friendship and mutual esteem with their genial influence put aside the cloud and restored the sunshine of harmony, to an assemblage collected to discuss the interests of California, and not to consider speculative or individual ends. The result has proved most beneficial. The important business of the session has been transacted and we are about to part—to sunder the cherished ties which many of us have formed during the past few months, and return to render an account of our stewardship to our several constituencies, who will, undoubtedly, freely sanction what they conceive right, and as readily condemn whatever may appear to them to be wrong.
The ruffled passions and angry feelings engendered by fierce contention and heated debates, will soon be forever calmed, and remembered among the things that were, and give way to more pleasant remembrances of attachments here formed, which will be erased only by death.
The State no longer needs our services—our homes invite us to our domestic duties, and I pronounce this House adjourned sine die.
Journal of the Assembly, Legislature of the State of California. May 15, 1854
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Charles Warner Company v. Independent Pier Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
278 U.S. 85
Charles Warner Company v. Independent Pier Company
Argued: Oct. 10, 1928. --- Decided: Nov 19, 1928
Messrs. E. H. Brown Jr., and J. T. Manning, Jr., both of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.
Mr. Howard M. Long, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent in No. 22.
Messrs. Chauncey I. Clark and Frederic Conger, both of New York City, for respondent in No. 23.
[Argument of Counsel from page 86 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Charles Ramsay Company v. Associated Bill Posters

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
260 U.S. 501
Charles Ramsay Company v. Associated Bill Posters
Argued: Nov. 5, 1922. --- Decided: Jan 2, 1923
Messrs. John A. Hartpence and Thomas S. Haight, both of Jersey City, N. J., for plaintiffs in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 501-505 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Richard T. Greene, of New York City, for defendants in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 505-509 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Charles Sheeler to William Macbeth, 1910 Sept. 26

letter to gallery owner William Macbeth
​Philadelphia September 26th 1910
My dear Mr. Macbeth
I found your note awaiting me on my return to town last Wednesday - the pictures I received Saturday.
I was surprised and sorry that you failed to recognize the merits of my pictures. It was not possible to continue to repeat the things one has done - there must always be elimination of the essentials and the striving after greater qualities, and to more forcefully present the essentialism or stagnation must result.
You say you hope it is only an experiment — every one who is sincerely trying to solve the enormous difficulties of artistic expression is an experimenter ​ and remains so, as long as he is "artistically alive." I regret that you do not care to show my pictures at this time.
Very truly yours, C. R. Sheeler 1626 Chestnut St.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1965, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 58 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Charles Sumner (Longfellow)

* "Charles Sumner" in Birds of Passage, 1874.
* "Alike are Life and Death" in The Riverside song book, 1893.
# Chicago Railway Company v. Osborne Same/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
146 U.S. 354
Chicago Railway Company v. Osborne Same
W. C. Goudy, opposed.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE.
The petitions for writs of certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the eighth circuit are denied. McLish v. Roff, 141 U.S. 661, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 118; Rice v. Sanger, 144 U.S. 197, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 664; Meagher v. Manufacturing Co., 145 U.S. 608, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 876.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chicago Railway Company v. Ohle

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
117 U.S. 123
Chicago Railway Company v. Ohle
Argued: March 1, 1886. ---
N. M. Hubbard and Chas. A. Clark, for plaintiff in error.
S. S. Burdett, for defendant in error.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chicago Railway Company v. Schendel

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
270 U.S. 611
Chicago Railway Company v. Schendel
Argued: March 17, 18, 1926. --- Decided: April 12, 1926
Messrs. Edward S. Stringer, of St. Paul, Minn., M. L. Bell, of New York City, W. F. Dickinson and Daniel Taylor, both of Chicago, Ill., and Thomas D. O'Brien and Alexander E. Horn, both of St. Paul, Minn., for petitioner.
Messrs. Ernest A. Michel and Tom Davis, both of Minneapolis, Minn., for respondents Schendel and others.
Messrs. Ernest A. Michel and Tom Davis, both of Minneapolis, Minn., and Leach & Leach, of Owatonna, Minn., for respondent Elder.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chicago Railway Company v. Osborne Same

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
146 U.S. 354
Chicago Railway Company v. Osborne Same
C. C. Nourse, for petitioners.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chicago Railway Company v. Perry

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
259 U.S. 548
Chicago Railway Company v. Perry
Argued: and Submitted October 6, 1921. --- Decided: June 5, 1922
Messrs. C. O. Blake and W. R. Bleakmore, both of El Reno, Okl., John W. Willmott and R. J. Roberts, both of Wewoka, Okl., and T. P. Littlepage and Sidney F. Taliaferro, both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Phil D. Brewer and Ed. S. Vaught, both of Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice PITNEY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cicero's Tusculan Disputations

CICERO'S
TUSCULAN DISPUTATIONS;
ALSO, TREATISES ON
THE NATURE OF THE GODS,
AND ON
THE COMMONWEALTH.
LITERALLY TRANSLATED, CHIEFLY BY
C. D. YONGE.
NEW YORK: HARPER & BROTHERS, PUBLISHERS, FRANKLIN SQUARE. 1888.
HARPER'S
NEW CLASSICAL LIBRARY.
COMPRISING LITERAL TRANSLATIONS OF
* CÆSAR.
* VIRGIL.
* SALLUST.
* HORACE.
* TERENCE.
* TACITUS. 2 Vols.
* LIVY. 8 Vols.
* CICERO'S ORATIONS.
* CICERO'S OFFICES, LÆLIUS, CATO MAJOR, PARADOXES, SCIPIO'S DREAM, LETTER TO QUINTUS.
* CICERO ON ORATORY AND ORATORS.
* CICERO'S TUSCULAN DISPUTATIONS, THE NATURE OF THE GODS, AND THE COMMONWEALTH.
* JUVENAL.
* XENOPHON.
* HOMER'S ILIAD.
* HOMER'S ODYSSEY.
* HERODOTUS.
* DEMOSTHENES. 2 Vols.
* THUCYDIDES.
* ÆSCHYLUS.
* SOPHOCLES.
* EURIPIDES. 2 Vols.
PLATO (SELECT DIALOGUES). :
12mo, Cloth, $1 00 per Volume.
☞Harper & Brothers will send either of the above works by mail, postage prepaid, to any part of the United States or Canada, on receipt of the price.
NOTE.
The greater portion of the Republic was previously translated by Francis Barham, Esq., and published in 1841. Although ably performed, it was not sufficiently close for the purpose of the "Classical Library," and was therefore placed in the hands of the present editor for revision, as well as for collation with recent texts. This has occasioned material alterations and additions.
The treatise "On the Nature of the Gods" is a revision of that usually ascribed to the celebrated Benjamin Franklin.
CONTENTS.
page
# Cicero (Collins)

* related portals: Latin language and literature.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, quotes, Wikidata item.
A survey of the works of Cicero.
* Cicero, 1st edition, UK (1871) (transcription project)
* Cicero, reprint, US (1873) (transcription project)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cicenia v. La Gay

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
357 U.S. 504
Cicenia v. La Gay
Argued: April 2, 1958. --- Decided: June 30, 1958
Mr. Dickinson R. Debevoise, Newark, N.J., for petitioner.
Mr. C. William Caruso, Newark, N.J., for respondent.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cicenia v. La Gay/Dissent Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Douglas
United States Supreme Court
357 U.S. 504
Cicenia v. La Gay
Argued: April 2, 1958. --- Decided: June 30, 1958
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, with whom The CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice BLACK concur, dissenting.
Petitioner, pursuant to a request left by the police at his home on Saturday, December 17, appeared at headquarters in Orange, New Jersey, at 9 a.m. on the 18th. He did so on the advice of his lawyer, Frank A. Palmieri. Petitioner's brother and father accompanied him on this visit but were separated from him on arrival at the headquarters. Shortly thereafter petitioner was taken to Newark where he was interrogated by the police until 9:30 p.m. when he confessed. Between 2 p.m. and 9:30 p.m. Mr. Palmieri asked over and again to see his client; but his requests were not granted. On this phase of the case the District Court said:
'Mr. Palmieri was not produced as a witness on the trial of this case, but his affidavit was admitted by stipulation. The contents of his affidavit and the testimony of petitioner's father and brother are at variance with the testimony of the Newark police as to the manner in which petitioner and his counsel were restrained from communicating with each other. According to petitioner's witnesses Palmieri's pleas were met with blunt refusals and remarks such as 'We're working on him.' The police claim to have been much more decorous. But whether it was done flippantly or courteously, the fact remains that for over seven hours the Newark police formed an insuperable barrier between an accused who wanted to see his counsel, and counsel who wanted to see his client. And it was during these seven hours that the police and an assistant prosecutor were able to obtain a detailed confession from petitioner.' 148 F.Supp. 98, 99-100.
The District Court reached 'without enthusiasm' the conclusion that petitioner's constitutional rights had not been impaired. Id., at page 104. The Court of Appeals evinced the same lack of enthusiasm for the result. 3 Cir., 240 F.2d 844. Both lower courts felt that any correction of this unjust result should come from us. I regret that we have not taken this case, and the companion cases, as the occasion to bring our decisions into tune with the constitutional requirement for fair criminal proceedings against the citizen. I would reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in my dissent in Crooker v. California, 357 U.S. 441, 78 S.Ct. 1293.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cicero (Collins 1871)

Ancient Classics for English Readers
EDITED BY THE
REV. W. LUCAS COLLINS, M.A.
CICERO
The Volumes published of this Series contain
HOMER: THE ILIAD, by the Editor.
HOMER: THE ODYSSEY, by the Same.
HERODOTUS, by George C. Swayne, M.A.
CÆSAR, by Anthony Trollope.
VIRGIL, by the Editor.
HORACE, by Theodore Martin.
ÆSCHYLUS, by Reginald S. Copleston, B.A.
XENOPHON, by Sir Alexander Grant, Bart., LL.D.
The following Authors, by various Contributors, are in preparation:—
A Volume will be published Quarterly, price 2s. 6d.
CICERO
BY THE
REV. W. LUCAS COLLINS, M.A.
AUTHOR OF 'ETONIANA,' 'THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS,' ETC.
WILLIAM BLACKWOOD AND SONS
EDINBURGH AND LONDON
MDCCCLXXI
​I have to acknowledge my obligations to Mr Forsyth's well-known 'Life of Cicero,' especially as a guide to the biographical materials which abound in his Orations and Letters. Mr Long's scholarly volumes have also been found useful. For the translations, such as they are, I am responsible. If I could have met with any which seemed to me more satisfactory, I would gladly have adopted them.
W. L. C.
CONTENTS.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chy Lung v. Freeman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
92 U.S. 275
Chy Lung v. Freeman
ERROR to the Supreme Court of the State of California.
Mr. Attorney-General Pierrepont for the plaintiff in error.
No opposing counsel.
MR. JUSTICE MILLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Easterwine

From volume 5 of the work.
Easterwine (or Eosterwini), Abbot of Wearmouth, was the nephew of St. Benedict Biscop; b. 650, d. March 7, 686. Descended from the noblest stock of Northumbria, as a young man he led the life of a soldier in the army of King Egfrid, the son of Oswy. When twenty-four years old he gave up the soldier's profession to become a monk in the monastery of Wearmouth, then ruled over by St. Benedict Biscop. He is described as a noble youth, conspicuous for his humility and bodily activity, but withal infinitely gentle; a most exact observer of rule and one who loved to perform the lowliest work. He was ordained priest in the year 679, and in 682 St. Benedict appointed him abbot of Wearmouth as coadjutor to himself. As superior "when he was compelled to reprove a fault, it was done with such tender sadness that the culprit felt himself incapable of any new offense which should bring a cloud over the benign brightness of that beloved face". In the year 686 a deadly pestilence overspread the country; it attacked the community at Wearmouth and the youthful abbot was one of its victims. He bade farewell to all, the day before he died, and passed away on March 7, when only thirty-six years old. St. Benedict was absent in Rome at the time of his death and Sigfried was chosen by the monks as his successor. Easterwine is not known to have been the author of any works.
G. E. HIND