OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996/1998-10-30/Chapter 2

Chapter 2
Bill of Rights
Rights
7.
(1)
(2)
(3)
Application
8.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(a)
(b)
(4)
Equality
9.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Human dignity
10.
Life
11.
Freedom and security of the person
12.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Slavery, servitude and forced labour
13.
Privacy
14.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
​Freedom of religion, belief and opinion
15.
(1)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(3)
(a)
(i)
(ii)
(b)
Freedom of expression
16.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Assembly, demonstration, picket and petition
17.
Freedom of association
18.
Political rights
19.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(2)
(3)
(a)
(b)
Citizenship
20.
Freedom of movement and residence
21.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Freedom of trade, occupation and profession
22.
Labour relations
23.
(1)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(3)
(a)
(b)
(4)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(5)
(6)
Environment
24.
(a)
(b)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
Property
25.
(1)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(3)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(4)
(a)
(b)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
Housing
26.
(1)
(2)
(3)
Health care, food, water and social security
27.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(2)
(3)
Children
28.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(i)
(ii)
(g)
(i)
(ii)
(h)
(i)
(2)
(3)
Education
29.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(3)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(4)
Language and culture
30.
​Cultural, religious and linguistic communities
31.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(2)
Access to information
32.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(2)
Just administrative action
33.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Access to courts
34.
Arrested, detained and accused persons
35.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(i)
(ii)
(c)
(d)
(i)
(ii)
(e)
(f)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(3)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(l)
(m)
(n)
(o)
(4)
(5)
Limitation of rights
36.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(2)
States of emergency
37.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(3)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(4)
(a)
(b)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(5)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Table of Non-Derogable Rights
(6)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(7)
(8)
Enforcement of rights
38.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Interpretation of Bill of Rights
39.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(2)
(3)
# Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996/1998-10-30/Chapter 6

Chapter 6
Provinces
Provinces
103.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(2)
Provincial Legislatures
Legislative authority of provinces
104.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(c)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Composition and election of provincial legislatures
105.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(2)
Membership
106.
(1)
(a)
(i)
(ii)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(2)
(3)
(a)
(b)
(4)
Oath or affirmation
107.
Duration of provincial legislatures
108.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Dissolution of provincial legislatures before expiry of term
109.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(2)
(a)
(b)
Sittings and recess periods
110.
(1)
(2)
(3)
Speakers and Deputy Speakers
111.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Decisions
112.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(2)
(a)
(b)
Permanent delegates’ rights in provincial legislatures
113.
Powers of provincial legislatures
114.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(i)
(ii)
Evidence or information before provincial legislatures
115.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Internal arrangements, proceedings and procedures of provincial legislatures
116.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Privilege
117.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(i)
(ii)
(2)
(3)
Public access to and involvement in provincial legislatures
118.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(i)
(ii)
(2)
Introduction of Bills
119.
​Money Bills
120.
(1)
(2)
Assent to Bills
121.
(1)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(3)
Application by members to Constitutional Court
122.
(1)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(3)
(a)
(b)
(4)
Publication of provincial Acts
123.
​Safekeeping of provincial Acts
124.
Provincial Executives
Executive authority of provinces
125.
(1)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(a)
(b)
​Assignment of functions
126.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Powers and functions of Premiers
127.
(1)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
Election of Premiers
128.
(1)
(2)
(3)
Assumption of office by Premiers
129.
Term of office and removal of Premiers
130.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(4)
Acting Premiers
131.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(2)
(3)
Executive Councils
132.
(1)
(2)
Accountability and responsibilities
133.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(a)
(b)
Continuation of Executive Councils after elections
134.
Oath or affirmation
135.
Conduct of members of Executive Councils
136.
(1)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Transfer of functions
137.
(a)
(b)
Temporary assignment of functions
138.
Provincial supervision of local government
139.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(3)
Executive decisions
140.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(a)
(b)
Motions of no confidence
141.
(1)
(2)
Provincial Constitutions
Adoption of provincial constitutions
142.
Contents of provincial constitutions
143.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(i)
(ii)
Certification of provincial constitutions
144.
(1)
(2)
(a)
(b)
Signing, publication and safekeeping of provincial constitutions
145.
(1)
(2)
(3)
Conflicting Laws
Conflicts between national and provincial legislation
146.
(1)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(c)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(3)
(a)
(b)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
Other conflicts
147.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(2)
Conflicts that cannot be resolved
148.
Status of legislation that does not prevail
149.
Interpretation of conflicts
150.
# Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996/1998-10-30/Chapter 7

Chapter 7
Local Government
Status of municipalities
151.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Objects of local government
152.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(2)
Developmental duties of municipalities
153.
(a)
(b)
Municipalities in co-operative government
154.
(1)
capacity of municipalities to manage their own affairs, to exercise their powers and to perform their functions.
(2)
Establishment of municipalities
155.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(2)
(3)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(a)
(b)
(6A)
(a)
(i)
(ii)
(b)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(7)
Powers and functions of municipalities
156.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(a)
(b)
(5)
Composition and election of Municipal Councils
157.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(i)
(ii)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(3)
(4)
(a)
(b)
(5)
(6)
Membership of Municipal Councils
158.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(2)
Terms of Municipal Councils
159.
(1)
(2)
(3)
Internal procedures
160.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(3)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(4)
(a)
(b)
(5)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(6)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(7)
(8)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Privilege
161.
Publication of municipal by-laws
162.
(1)
(2)
(3)
Organised local government
163.
(a)
(b)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
Other matters
164.
# Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996/1998-10-30/Schedule 1

Schedule 1
National Flag
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
# Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996/1998-10-30/Chapter 5

Chapter 5
The President and National Executive
The President
83.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Powers and functions of President
84.
(1)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
Executive authority of the Republic
85.
(1)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Election of President
86.
(1)
(2)
(3)
Assumption of office by President
87.
Term of office of President
88.
(1)
(2)
Removal of President
89.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(2)
that office, and may not serve in any public office.
Acting President
90.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Cabinet
91.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(4)
(5)
Accountability and responsibilities
92.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(a)
(b)
matters under their control.
Deputy Ministers
93.
Continuation of Cabinet after elections
94.
Oath or affirmation
95.
Conduct of Cabinet members and Deputy Ministers
96.
(1)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Transfer of functions
97.
(a)
(b)
Temporary assignment of functions
98.
Assignment of functions
99.
(a)
Cabinet member and the Executive Council member or Municipal Council;
(b)
(c)
National supervision of provincial administration
100.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(2)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(3)
Executive decisions
101.
(1)
(a)
(b)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(a)
(b)
Motions of no confidence
102.
(1)
(2)
# Christian Science/Chapter IX

We may now make a final footing-up of Mrs. Eddy, and see what she is, in the fulness of her powers. She is:
The Massachusetts Metaphysical College Pastor Emeritus; President; Board of Directors; Board of Education; Board of Lectureships; Future Board of Trustees, Proprietor of the Publishing-House and Periodicals; Treasurer; Clerk; Proprietor of the Teachers; Proprietor of the Lecturers; Proprietor of the Missionaries; Proprietor of the Readers; Dictator of the Services; sole Voice of the Pulpit; Proprietor of the Sanhedrin; Sole Proprietor of the Creed. (Copyrighted.); Indisputable Autocrat of the Branch Churches, with their life and death in her hands; Sole Thinker for The First Church (and the others); Sole and Infallible Expounder of Doctrine, in life and in death; Sole permissible Discoverer, Denouncer, Judge, and Executioner of Ostensible Hypnotists; Fifty-handed God of Excommunication—with a thunderbolt in every hand; Appointer and Installer of the Pastor of all the Churches—the Perpetual Pastor-Universal, Science and Health, "the Comforter."
# Christian Science/Appendix F

Few will deny that an intelligence apart from man formed and governs the spiritual universe and man; and this intelligence is the eternal Mind, and neither matter nor man created this intelligence and divine Principle; nor can this Principle produce aught unlike itself. All that we term sin, sickness, and death is comprised in the belief of matter. The realm of the real is spiritual; the opposite of Spirit is matter; and the opposite of the real is unreal or material. Matter is an error of statement, for there is no matter. This error of premises leads to error of conclusion in every statement of matter as a basis. Nothing we can say or believe regarding matter is true, except that matter is unreal, simply a belief that has its beginning and ending.
The conservative firm called matter and mind God never formed. The unerring and eternal Mind destroys this imaginary copartnership, formed only to be dissolved in a manner and at a period unknown. This copartnership is obsolete. Placed under the microscope of metaphysics matter disappears. Only by understanding there are not two, matter and mind, is a logical and correct conclusion obtained by either one. Science gathers not grapes of thorns or figs of thistles. Intelligence never produced non-intelligence, such as matter: the immortal never produced mortality, good never resulted in evil. The science of Mind shows conclusively that matter is a myth. Metaphysics are above physics, and drag not matter, or what is termed that, into one of its premises or conclusions. Metaphysics resolves things into thoughts, and exchanges the objects of sense for the ideas of Soul. These ideas are perfectly tangible and real to consciousness, and they have this advantage—they are eternal. Mind and its thoughts comprise the whole of God, the universe, and of man. Reason and revelation coincide with this statement, and support its proof every hour, for nothing is harmonious or eternal that is not spiritual: the realization of this will bring out objects from a higher source of thought; hence more beautiful and immortal.
The fact of spiritualization produces results in striking contrast to the farce of materialization: the one produces the results of chastity and purity, the other the downward tendencies and earthward gravitation of sensualism and impurity.
The exalting and healing effects of metaphysics show their fountain. Nothing in pathology has exceeded the application of metaphysics. Through mind alone we have prevented disease and preserved health. In cases of chronic and acute diseases, in their severest forms, we have changed the secretions, renewed structure, and restored health; have elongated shortened limbs, relaxed rigid muscles, made cicatrized joints supple; restored carious bones to healthy conditions, renewed that which is termed the lost substance of the lungs; and restored healthy organizations where disease was organic instead of functional.
# Christian Science/Book II

"There were remarkable things about the stranger called the Man—Mystery-things so very extraordinary that they monopolized attention and made all of him seem extraordinary; but this was not so, the most of his qualities being of the common, every-day size and like anybody else's. It was curious. He was of the ordinary stature, and had the ordinary aspects; yet in him were hidden such strange contradictions and disproportions! He was majestically fearless and heroic; he had the strength of thirty men and the daring of thirty thousand; handling armies, organizing states, administering governments—these were pastimes to him; he publicly and ostentatiously accepted the human race at its own valuation—as demigods—and privately and successfully dealt with it at quite another and juster valuation—as children and slaves; his ambitions were stupendous, and his dreams had no commerce with the humble plain, but moved with the cloud-rack among the snow-summits. These features of him were, indeed, extraordinary, but the rest of him was ordinary and usual. He was so mean-minded, in the matter of jealousy, that it was thought he was descended from a god; he was vain in little ways, and had a pride in trivialities; he doted on ballads about moonshine and bruised hearts; in education he was deficient, he was indifferent to literature, and knew nothing of art; he was dumb upon all subjects but one, indifferent to all except that one—the Nebular Theory. Upon that one his flow of words was full and free, he was a geyser. The official astronomers disputed his facts and deeded his views, and said that he had invented both, they not being findable in any of the books. But many of the laity, who wanted their nebulosities fresh, admired his doctrine and adopted it, and it attained to great prosperity in spite of the hostility of the experts."—The Legend of the Man-Mystery, ch. i.
# Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. Johnson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. Johnson, 303 U.S. 77 (1938) is a case in which the United States Supreme Court dealt with corporate entities. The case involved whether the state of California could levy a tax, on a company licensed to do business in that state, for transactions that occurred in a different state. Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
303 U.S. 77
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. Johnson
Argued: Jan. 14, 1938. --- Decided: Jan 31, 1938
Messrs. Wm. Marshall Bullitt, of Louisville, Ky., and B. M. Anderson, of Hartford, Conn., for appellant.
Mr. Neil Cunningham, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Connally v. General Const Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
269 U.S. 385
Connally v. General Const Company
Argued: Nov. 30 and Dec. 1, 1925. --- Decided: Jan 4, 1926
Messrs. George F. Short, of Oklahoma City, Okl., and J. Berry King, of Muskogee, Okl., for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 385-387 intentionally omitted]
Mr. J. D. Lydick, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellee.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Conn v. Penn

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
18 U.S. 424
Conn v. Penn
March 14th.
This cause was argued by Mr. Pinkney, and Mr. Jones, for the appellants, and by the Attorney-General, and Mr. Sergeant, for the respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Conley v. Nailor

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
118 U.S. 127
Conley v. Nailor
Argued: April 26, 1886. ---
W. D. Davidge and Irving Williamson, for appellant, Catharine conley.
W. A. Cook and C. C. Cole, for appellees, Rachel D. Nailor and others.
WOODS, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cream of Wheat Company v. Grand Forks County

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
253 U.S. 325
Cream of Wheat Company v. Grand Forks County
Argued: April 29, 1920. --- Decided: June 1, 1920
Messrs. Rome G. Brown and Harry S.C.arson, both of Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Albert E. Sheets, Jr., and George E. Wallace, both of Bismarck, N. D., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cream of Tannahill's Songs (3)/The Highland Plaid

O ROW THEE IN MY HIGHLAND PLAID.
# Cream of Tannahill's Songs (3)/The Summer Gloamin

THE SUMMER GLOAMIN.
# Cream of Tannahill's Songs (3)/When John and Me were Married

WHEN JOHN AND ME WERE MARRIED.
# Cream of Tannahill's Songs (3)/The Lass o' Arranteenie

THE LASS O' ARRANTEENIE.
# Cream of Tannahill's Songs (3)/When Rosie was faithfu'

WHEN ROSIE WAS FAITHFU’.
O ROW THEE IN MY HIGHLAND PLAID.
# Creath's Administrator v. Sims

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
46 U.S. 192
Creath's Administrator v. Sims
THE reporter finds the following statement of the case prefixed to the opinion of the court, as delivered by Mr. Justice Daniel.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Coalbrookdale Company auction poster, 1910

SHROPSHIRE.
VALUABLE
FREEHOLD ESTATE,
BELONGING TO
The Coalbrookdale Company, Limited,
Situate in the PARISHES OF WELLINGTON and DAWLEY.
Messrs. BARBER SON
Are honoured with instructions to Sell the above Valuable Property by Auction, at
THE TOWN HALL, WELLINGTON,
On WEDNESDAY, THURSDAY, & FRIDAY, OCTOBER 19th, 20th, & 21st, 1910,
At 2-30 p.m. punctually each day, subject to Conditions, in
232 LOTS.
The ESTATE is entirely FREEHOLD, and has an area of about
900 ACRES
IT COMPRISES-
Several conveniently arranged FARMS,
With HOMESTEADS and BUILDINGS THEREON, including—
LAWLEY FARM, HORSEHAY FARM, LAWELY BANK FARM, and NEW DALE FARM.
MANY SUPERIOR
VILLA RESIDENCES,
With GROUNDS and GARDENS.
Several SHOPS and PREMISES.
336 Good Cottages,
WITH
LARGE GARDENS
MANY LOTS OF
Accommodation and and Garden Ground.
BUILDING SITES.
The Pool Hill County Council Schools
The Ground Rents of Three Chapels,
ALSO
Horsehay & Heathill Coppices,
HORSEHRY POOL & CINDER HILL,
Also all the Existing Leases and Contracts of the Mines and Minerals on and under the above.
The Lots are situated at New Dale, Arleston Brook, Lawley, Lawley Bank, Lawley Common, Dawley Bank, Dawley, Little Dawley, and Horsehay.
PLANS AND PARTICULARS may be obtained from the OFFICES OF THE COALBROOKDALE COMPANY, LIMITED, Coalbrookdale; from Messrs. PAINES & Co., Solicitors, 14, St. Helen's Place, London, E.C.; The AUCTIONEERS' INSTITUTE, Russell Square, London; or from Messrs. BARBER & SON, Auctioneers and Surveyors, Wellington, Shropshire.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Coan v. Flagg

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
123 U.S. 117
Coan v. Flagg
A. C. Thompson, Chas. King, Wm. B. King, and N. W. Evans, for plaintiff in error.
W. A. Hutchins, for defendant in error.
MATTHEWS, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Constitution of the German Democratic Republic

* Constitution of the German Democratic Republic (1949)
* Constitution of the German Democratic Republic (1968)
* Constitution of the German Democratic Republic (1974) (Wikisource translation)
* Draft of the Constitution of the German Democratic Republic (1990) (Wikisource translation)
# Constitution of the Fifth French Republic

English-language translations of Constitution de la Ve République include:
* Constitution of the Fifth French Republic (unamended)
* Constitution of the Fifth French Republic (amended, 2008)
# Czech Folk Tales/Back matter

Printed in Great Britain by
UNWINN BROTHERS, LIMITED, THE GRESHAM PRESS, WOKING AND LONDON
# Cyriack, this three years day these eys, though clear

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Cyriack, this three years day these eys, though clear To outward view, of blemish or of spot; Bereft of light, thir seeing have forgot, Nor to thir idle orbs doth sight appear Of Sun or Moon or Starre throughout the year, Or man or woman. Yet I argue not Against heavns hand or will, nor bate a jot Of heart or hope; but still bear up and steer Right onward. What supports me, dost thou ask? The conscience, Friend, to have lost them overply'd In libertyes defence, my noble task, Of which all Europe talks from side to side. This thought might lead me through the worlds vain mask Content though blind, had I no better guide.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Czaplicki v. The S.S. Hoegh Silvercloud/Concurrence Frankfurter

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
351 U.S. 525
Czaplicki v. The S.S. Hoegh Silvercloud
Argued: April 24, 1956. ---
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER, concurring.
The disposition of a case is of prime importance to the parties. How a result is reached concerns the rational development of law. I agree with the Court's disposition of this case, but I would dispose of the main issue-the nature of Czaplicki's interest that survives his acceptance of compensation under the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, 44 Stat. 1424, as amended, 52 Stat. 1164, 33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq., 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq.-on the basis of the analysis made in United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States, 2 Cir., 152 F.2d 46, 48. The reasoning of that case seems to me to carry out the scheme of the legislation with appropriate consistency.
'So far as concerns the tortfeasor's liability to the employee beyond the amount of workmen's compensation, no agreement between the tortfeasor and the employer can prejudice the employee, because, although it is true that, by accepting compensation, the employee assigns his claim against the tortfeasor to the employer or insurer, the assignee holds it for the benefit of the employee so far as it is not necessary for his own recoupment. The assignee is in effect a trustee, and, although it is true that the statute gives him power to compromise the whole claim, he must not, in doing so, entirely disregard the employee's interest.' 152 F.2d 46, 48.
Although this suit was brought directly against the tortfeasor, the Court directs that Travelers, the subrogee insurer, should be made a party. Since I deem the proper theory on which Czaplicki may recover despite his compensation award to be Travelers' fiduciary responsibility, I would direct reconstruction of this proceeding so that it should be against Travelers, while the vessel would be retained as a party.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse