OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Reports/Volume 4

4 Dall.[as], ( 1 L.Ed. )

## Cases ruled and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States

* 4 U.S. 1 (1799) New York v. Connecticut
* 4 U.S. 3 (1799) New York v. Connecticut, 4 U.S. 3 (1799)
* 4 U.S. 6 (1799) New York v. Connecticut, 4 U.S. 6 (1799)
* 4 U.S. 6 (1799) Hazlehurst v. United States
* 4 U.S. 7 (1799) Turner v. Enrille
* 4 U.S. 8 (1799) Turner v. Bank of North-America
* 4 U.S. 12 (1800) Mossman v. Higginson
* 4 U.S. 14 (1800) Cooper v. Telfair
* 4 U.S. 20 (1800) Williamson v. Kincaid
* 4 U.S. 21 (1800) Blair v. Miller
* 4 U.S. 22 (1800) Rutherford v. Fisher
* 4 U.S. 22 (1800) Blaine v. Ship Charles Carter
* 4 U.S. 22 (1800) Course v. Stead
* 4 U.S. 28 (1800) Priestman v. U.S.
* 4 U.S. 34 (1800) Talbot v. Ship Amelia
* 4 U.S. 37 (1800) Bas v. Tingy

## Cases affirmed or reversed in the High Court of Errors and Appeals

* 4 U.S. 47 Ludlow,, v. Bingham.
* 4 U.S. 76 Burd,, v. Smith, Lessee of Fitzsimons
* 4 U.S. 95 Lea, Executrix, et al. v. Yard. Hazlehurst et al

## Cases ruled and adjudged in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

* 4 U.S. 107 Geyer's Lessee v. Irwin.
* 4 U.S. 143 The Commonwealth v. Chambr E.
* 4 U.S. 147 Anonymous
* 4 U.S. 155 Keppele v. Carr Car
* 4 U.S. 163 Ball v. Dennison.
* 4 U.S. 167 Levy v. Wallis.
* 4 U.S. 170 The Commonwealth v. Tench Coxe, Esq.
* 4 U.S. 211 Beissell v. Sholl. Wagon
* 4 U.S. 213 Chancellor v. Phillips
* 4 U.S. 218 The Lessee of Weitzell v. Fry.
* 4 U.S. 222 Pollock v. Hall
* 4 U.S. 225 Commonwealth v. Addison.
* 4 U.S. 227 Austyn v. M'Lure.
* 4 U.S. 232 Falconer v. Montgomery
* 4 U.S. 237 Attorney General v. The Grantees Under the Act of April 1792
* 4 U.S. 250 Cochran v. Cummings.
* 4 U.S. 266 The Mayor v. Mason
* 4 U.S. 279 Sharpless v. Welsh
* 4 U.S. 286 Crawford v. Willing
* 4 U.S. 298 Maybin, Surviving Partner v. Coulon
* 4 U.S. 300 Deshler v. Beery.
* 4 U.S. 303 Commonwealth v. Matlack.
* 4 U.S. 316 Commonwealth v. Franklin
* 4 U.S. 320 Welsh v. Murray.

## Cases ruled and adjudged in the Circuit Court, Pennsylvania District

* 4 U.S. 325 Searight v. Calbraith Calbrait
* 4 U.S. 340 O'Harra v. Hall.
* 4 U.S. 345 Hollingsworth v. Fry.
* 4 U.S. 353 Hurst's Lessee v. Jones.
* 4 U.S. 354 Penn v. Butler. Butl
* 4 U.S. 358 The United States v. Coyngham
* 4 U.S. 363 Balfour's Lessee v. Meade.
* 4 U.S. 372 The United States v. Thomas Passmore.
* 4 U.S. 387 Hurst's Case
* 4 U.S. 389 Walker v. Smith
* 4 U.S. 392 Huidekoper's Lessee v. Douglass.
* 4 U.S. 402 Penn's Lessee v. Klyne.
* 4 U.S. 412 The United States v. Richard Johns.
* 4 U.S. 426 the United States v. James McGill.

## Cases ruled and adjudged in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

* 4 U.S. 433 Lyle v. Baker
* 4 U.S. 436 Bender v. Fromberger
* 4 U.S. 441 Bender v. Fromberger (The Same Cause)
# United States Reports/Volume 40

15 Pet.[ers], ( 10 L.Ed. )
* 40 U.S. 1 Vaughan v. Administrator of Moody
* 40 U.S. 9 Edmund Gaines Mira Clarke Whitney v. Richard Relf Beverly Chew
* 40 U.S. 18 Effie Coons v. Charles P Gallaher
* 40 U.S. 21 Susan Mayburry v. John McPherson Brien
* 40 U.S. 40 North Carolina Jacob Houseman v. North Carolina: Oliver O'Hara
* 40 U.S. 52 Colin Mitchel v. United States
* 40 U.S. 93 Henry Brush v. John H Ware
* 40 U.S. 115 John Gorman v. Peter
* 40 U.S. 119 (1838) Anderson Crenshaw
* 40 U.S. 125 Smith v. Clapp
* 40 U.S. 130 United States v. John Rodman Robert McHardy
* 40 U.S. 141 United States v. Samuel W Dickson
* 40 U.S. 167 Barnett Eliza Levy v. Edmund David Fitzpatrick
* 40 U.S. 173 United States v. John Forber
* 40 U.S. 187 United States v. Gordon D Boyd
* 40 U.S. 211 Amis v. Pearle
* 40 U.S. 213 Martin Lea Monroe Rabetaille Charles Landon v. Enoch S Kelly
* 40 U.S. 215 Ann Buyck v. United States
* 40 U.S. 226 United States v. Joseph Delespine
* 40 U.S. 233 Rhode Island and Providence Plantations v. Massachusetts
* 40 U.S. 275 Oliver O'Hara v. United States
* 40 U.S. 284 William Gwin v. James H Breedlove
* 40 U.S. 287 Jane Young John Parks v. Edward L Smith Henry N Allen John Parks
* 40 U.S. 290 United States v. William Linn
* 40 U.S. 336 Charles Gratiot v. United States
* 40 U.S. 377 United States v. Bank of the Metropolis
* 40 U.S. 407 United States v. John Fitzgerald Hipolite Fitzgerald
* 40 U.S. 423 Philip Minis v. United States
* 40 U.S. 449 Moses Groves James Graham v. Robert Slaughter John W Brown Moses Groves R M Roberts James Graham
* 40 U.S. 518 The Amistad
# United States Reports/Volume 400

* 400 U.S. 1 (1970) McCann v. Babbitz
* 400 U.S. 3 (1970) Los Angeles Herald-Examiner v. Kennedy
* 400 U.S. 4 (1970) United States v. Maryland Savings-Share Insurance Corporation
* 400 U.S. 8 (1970) United States v. City of Chicago
* 400 U.S. 16 (1970) Colombo v. New York
* 400 U.S. 17 (1970) Thompson v. United States
* 400 U.S. 18 (1970) Lines v. Frederick
* 400 U.S. 23 (1970) Odom v. United States
* 400 U.S. 25 (1970) North Carolina v. Alford
* 400 U.S. 41 (1970) Fornaris v. Ridge Tool Company
* 400 U.S. 45 (1970) Arnold Tours, Inc. v. Camp
* 400 U.S. 48 (1970) Hickel v. Oil Shale Corp.
* 400 U.S. 62 (1970) Port of Boston Marine Terminal Association v. Rederiaktiebolaget Transatlantic
* 400 U.S. 74 (1970) Dutton v. Evans
* 400 U.S. 112 (1970) Oregon v. Mitchell
* 400 U.S. 297 (1971) National Labor Relations Board v. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers
* 400 U.S. 309 (1971) Wyman v. James
* 400 U.S. 348 (1971) Decker v. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.
* 400 U.S. 350 (1971) Bruno v. Pennsylvania
* 400 U.S. 351 (1971) US Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. Arguelles
* 400 U.S. 379 (1971) Perkins v. Matthews
* 400 U.S. 410 (1971) Blount v. Rizzi
* 400 U.S. 423 (1971) Kennerly v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial District of Montana
* 400 U.S. 433 (1971) Wisconsin v. Constantineau
* 400 U.S. 446 (1971) Procunier v. Atchley
* 400 U.S. 455 (1971) Mayberry v. Pennsylvania
* 400 U.S. 470 (1971) United States v. Jorn
* 400 U.S. 494 (1971) Usner v. Luckenbach Overseas Corp.
* 400 U.S. 505 (1971) Groppi v. Wisconsin
* 400 U.S. 517 (1971) Donaldson v. United States
* 400 U.S. 542 (1971) Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corporation
* 400 U.S. 548 (1971) Piccirillo v. New York
* 400 U.S. 803 (1970) Moore v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education
* 400 U.S. 858 (1970) Gordon v. United States
* 400 U.S. 858 (1970) Marcello v. United States
* 400 U.S. 858 (1970) Terry v. California
* 400 U.S. 858 (1970) Mears v. Hocker
* 400 U.S. 858 (1970) White v. Young
* 400 U.S. 870 (1970) Chambers v. Cox
* 400 U.S. 873 (1970) Braswell v. Florida
* 400 U.S. 886 (1970) Massachusetts v. Laird
* 400 U.S. 932 (1970) Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company v. United States
* 400 U.S. 936 (1970) Stanley v. United States
* 400 U.S. 956 (1970) Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. Chemtronics, Inc.
* 400 U.S. 968 (1971) San Antonio Conservation Society v. Texas Highway Department
* 400 U.S. 982 (1970) Weed v. Bilbrey
* 400 U.S. 1004 (1971) Crosslin v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Company
* 400 U.S. 1012 (1971) Rodicker v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
* 400 U.S. 1014 (1971) Weintraub v. United States
* 400 U.S. 1203 (1970) Davis v. Adams
* 400 U.S. 1205 (1970) Fowler v. Adams
* 400 U.S. 1207 (1970) Dexter v. Schrunk
* 400 U.S. 1208 (1970) Marcello v. United States
* 400 U.S. 1211 (1970) Harris v. United States
# United States Reports/Volume 399

* 399 U.S. 1 (1970) Coleman v. Alabama
* 399 U.S. 30 (1970) Vale v. Louisiana
* 399 U.S. 42 (1970) Chambers v. Maroney
* 399 U.S. 66 (1970) Baldwin v. New York
* 399 U.S. 78 (1970) Williams v. Florida
* 399 U.S. 146 (1970) Illinois v. Missouri
* 399 U.S. 149 (1970) California v. Green
* 399 U.S. 204 (1970) City of Phoenix v. Kolodziejski
* 399 U.S. 219 (1970) Arkansas v. Tennessee
* 399 U.S. 222 (1970) Perkins v. Standard Oil Company of California
* 399 U.S. 224 (1970) Nelson v. George
* 399 U.S. 235 (1970) Williams v. Illinois
* 399 U.S. 267 (1970) United States v. Sisson
* 399 U.S. 350 (1970) United States v. Phillipsburg National Bank & Trust Company
* 399 U.S. 383 (1970) Gunn v. University Committee to End War in Viet Nam
* 399 U.S. 392 (1970) New Haven Inclusion Cases
* 399 U.S. 508 (1970) Morris v. Schoonfield
* 399 U.S. 510 (1970) Simmons v. West Haven Housing Authority
* 399 U.S. 517 (1970) United States v. Sweet
* 399 U.S. 524 (1970) Hoyt v. Minnesota
* 399 U.S. 525 (1970) Kelley v. Arizona
* 399 U.S. 526 (1970) Morico v. United States
* 399 U.S. 906 (1970) Norton v. Discipline Committee of East Tennessee State University
* 399 U.S. 936 (1970) Russell v. Catherwood
# United States Reports/Volume 395

* 395 U.S. 1 (1969) United States v. King
* 395 U.S. 6 (1969) Leary v. United States
* 395 U.S. 57 (1969) United States v. Covington
* 395 U.S. 62 (1969) Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Stanisic
* 395 U.S. 85 (1969) National Board of Young Men's Christian Associations v. United States
* 395 U.S. 100 (1969) Zenith Radio Corporation v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
* 395 U.S. 147 (1969) Frank v. United States
* 395 U.S. 162 (1969) Jones v. Illinois Electoral Board
* 395 U.S. 163 (1969) Buckley v. Ohio
* 395 U.S. 164 (1969) Crane v. Cedar Rapids & Iowa City Railway Company
* 395 U.S. 169 (1969) Sullivan v. United States
* 395 U.S. 185 (1969) McKart v. United States
* 395 U.S. 208 (1969) Perez v. California
* 395 U.S. 209 (1969) Mattiello v. Connecticut
* 395 U.S. 210 (1969) Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. O'connell
* 395 U.S. 212 (1969) Everhardt v. City of New Orleans
* 395 U.S. 213 (1969) Jenkins v. Delaware
* 395 U.S. 225 (1969) United States v. Montgomery County Board of Education
* 395 U.S. 238 (1969) Boykin v. Alabama
* 395 U.S. 250 (1969) Harrington v. California
* 395 U.S. 258 (1969) O'Callahan v. Parker
* 395 U.S. 285 (1969) Gaston County, North Carolina v. United States
* 395 U.S. 298 (1969) Daniel v. Paul
* 395 U.S. 316 (1969) United States v. Estate of Grace
* 395 U.S. 327 (1969) Rodriquez v. United States
* 395 U.S. 335 (1969) Kowan v. California
* 395 U.S. 336 (1969) Egleson v. Massachusetts
* 395 U.S. 337 (1969) Sniadach v. Family Finance Corporation of Bay View
* 395 U.S. 352 (1969) Rodrigue v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company
* 395 U.S. 367 (1969) Red Lion Broadcasting Company v. Federal Communications Commission
* 395 U.S. 402 (1815) Willingham v. Morgan
* 395 U.S. 411 (1969) Jenkins v. McKeithen
* 395 U.S. 444 (1969) Brandenburg v. Ohio
* 395 U.S. 458 (1969) Williams v. Oklahoma City
* 395 U.S. 463 (1969) McNeil v. United States
* 395 U.S. 464 (1969) Utah Public Service Commission v. El Paso Natural Gas Company
* 395 U.S. 486 (1969) Powell v. McCormack
* 395 U.S. 575 (1969) National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Company Food Store
* 395 U.S. 621 (1969) Kramer v. Union School District
* 395 U.S. 642 (1969) Perkins v. Standard Oil Company of California
* 395 U.S. 653 (1969) Lear, Inc. v. Adkins
* 395 U.S. 683 (1969) Noyd v. Bond
* 395 U.S. 701 (1969) Cipriano v. City of Houma
* 395 U.S. 708 (1969) Banks v. California
* 395 U.S. 710 (1969) Balistrieri v. United States
* 395 U.S. 711 (1969) North Carolina v. Pearce
* 395 U.S. 752 (1969) Chimel v. California
* 395 U.S. 784 (1969) Benton v. Maryland
* 395 U.S. 814 (1969) Von Cleef v. New Jersey
* 395 U.S. 818 (1969) Shipley v. California
* 395 U.S. 826 (1969) Rosado v. Wyman
* 395 U.S. 827 (1969) Lindsay v. Kelley
* 395 U.S. 828 (1969) Atlas Engine Works, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
* 395 U.S. 829 (1969) House v. United States
* 395 U.S. 830 (1969) Tillman v. United States
* 395 U.S. 841 (1969) Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen and Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Clinchfield Railroad Company
* 395 U.S. 901 (1969) United States v. Louisiana
* 395 U.S. 950 (1969) Sellers v. Laird
# United Nations General Assembly Resolution 15

15 (I). Amendments to the Provisional Rules of Procedure
The General Assembly resolves that:
Rules 37 and 40 and supplementary rules J and K of the provisional rules of procedure be amended to read as follows:
Rule 37
The General Assembly shall appoint an Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (hereinafter called the "Advisory Committee") with a membership of nine, including at least two financial experts of recognized standing.
Rule 40
The General Assembly shall appoint an expert Committee on Contributions, consisting of ten members.
Supplementary rule J
At the second part of the first session, the General Assembly shall elect simultaneously, in accordance with rule 75, the nine members of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions, two of whom at least shall be financial experts of recognized standing. It shall then, by a second vote, choose three of the elected members, one of whom shall be a financial expert, for the three-year term. By a third vote it shall choose three of the remaining elected members, one of whom shall be a financial expert, for the two-year term.
Supplementary rule K
At the first part of the first session, the General Assembly shall elect simultaneously, in accordance with rule 75, the ten members of the Committee on Contributions. It shall then, by a second vote, choose four of the elected members for the three-year term. By a third vote it shall choose three of the remaining elected members for the two-year term.
Thirty-first plenary meeting, 13 February 1946.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations General Assembly Resolution 12

12 (I). Appointment of Temporary Staff
Recognizing the ability and faithful service of the temporary staff under the Executive Secretary and the need for the staff members to be informed soon of their status in the Secretariat; and recognizing also the desirability of leaving to the Secretary-General full freedom to select the permanent staff which will assist him to carry out his responsibilities:
the General Assembly authorizes the Secretary-General to continue, pursuant to rule M of its provisional rules of procedure, the employment of the members of the staff of the Executive Secretary under the present terms and regulations until 1 April 1946, or until such prior date as the Secretary-General may enter into employment arrangements with such members in accordance with the provisional staff regulations and other conditions of employment in the Secretariat established by the General Assembly.
Twenty-first plenary meeting, 1 February 1946.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/25th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 188

Chap. CLXXXVIII.—An Act to encourage the introduction and promote the cultivation of tropical plants in the United States.
Preamble.Whereas in obedience to the Treasury circular of the sixth of September, eighteen hundred and twenty-seven, Doctor Henry Perrine, late American Consul at Campeachy, has distinguished himself by his persevering exertions to introduce tropical plants into the United States: and whereas he has demonstrated the existence of a tropical climate in southern Florida, and has shown the consequent certainty of the immediate domestication of tropical plants in tropical Florida, and the great probability of their gradual acclimation throughout all our southern and southwestern States, especially of such profitable plants as propagate themselves on the poorest soils; and whereas, if the enterprise should be successful, it will render valuable our hitherto worthless soils, by covering them with a dense population of small cultivators and family manufacturers, and will thus promote the peace, prosperity, and permanency of the Union: Therefore,
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Grant of land to H. Perrine. That a township of land is hereby granted to Doctor Henry Perrine and his associates, in the southern extremity of the peninsula of East Florida, to be located in one body of six miles square, upon any portion of the public lands below twenty-six degrees north latitude.
When to be located, &c. Proviso.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the said tract of land shall be located within two years from this date, by said Henry Perrine, and shall be surveyed under his direction, by the surveyor of Florida, Provided, That it shall not embrace any land having sufficient quantities of naval timber to be reserved to the United States, nor any sites for maritime ports or cities.
When a patent shall issue.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That whenever any section of land in said tract, shall be really occupied by a bona fide settler, actually engaged in the propagation or cultivation of valuable tropical plants, and upon proof thereof being made to the Commissioner of the General Land Office, a patent shall issue to the said Henry Perrine and his associates.
How and when it shall be forfeited to the U. S.Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That every section of land in the tract aforesaid, which shall not be occupied by an actual settler, positively engaged in the propagation or cultivation of useful tropical plants within eight years from the location of said tract, or when the adjacent territory shall be surveyed and offered for sale, shall be forfeited to the United States.
Approved, July 7, 1838.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/25th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 187

Chap. CLXXXVII.—An Act to repeal, in part, the act entitled “An act to provide for the safe keeping of the acts, records, and seal of the United States, and for other purposes.”
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,So much of act Sept. 15, 1789, ch. 14, as requires the Sec. of State to have the laws recorded, repealed. That so much of the act entitled “An act to provide for the safe keeping of the acts, records, and seal of the United States, and for other purposes,” approved fifteenth of September, one thousand seven hundred and eighty-nine, as directs the Secretary of State to cause to be recorded, in his office, the acts and resolutions of Congress, be, and the same is hereby, repealed.
Approved, July 7, 1838.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/25th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 189

Chap. CLXXXIX.—An Act granting half pay and pensions to certain widows.
Post, p. 584. Five years’ pension granted to certain widows of officers and soldiers, &c. Act of June 7, 1832, ch. 126.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That if any person who served in the war of the Revolution, in the manner specified in the act passed the seventh day of June, eighteen hundred and thirty-two, entitled “An act supplementary to the act for the relief of certain surviving officers and soldiers of the Revolution,” have died, leaving a widow, whose marriage took place after the expiration of the last period of his service, and before the first day of January, seventeen hundred and ninety-four, such widow shall be entitled to receive, for and during the term of five years from the fourth day of March, eighteen hundred and thirty-six, the annuity or pension which might have been allowed to her husband in virtue of said act, if living at the time it was passed; Provided, That inProviso. 1842, ch. 191. the event of the marriage of such widow, said annuity or pension shall be discontinued.
No pledge, mortgage, &c. of the half pay or pension to be valid. Not liable to be seized or attached.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That no pledge, mortgage, sale, assignment, or transfer of any right, claim, or interest, in any annuity, half pay, or pension, granted by this act, shall be valid, nor shall the half pay, annuity, or pension, granted by this act, or any former act of Congress, be liable to attachment, levy, or seizure, by any process in law, or equity, but shall enure wholly to the personal benefit of the pensioner or annuitant entitled to the same; and that before a warrant shall be delivered to any person acting for or in behalf of any one entitled to money under this act,Oath to be taken by an attorney before the delivery of the warrant. such person shall take and subscribe an oath or affirmation, to be administered by the proper accounting officer, and put on file, that he has no interest in said money, by any pledge, mortgage, transfer, agreement, understanding, or arrangement, and that he does not know or believe that the same has been so disposed of to any other person.
Regulations.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That the Secretary of War shall adopt such regulations and forms of evidence, in relation to applications and payments under this act as the President of the United States may prescribe.
Approved, July 7, 1838.