OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book XIX/Hymn 59

59. For successful sacrifice.
[Brahman.—tṛcam, āgneyam. trāiṣṭubham: 1. gāyatrī.]
Hymns 59-64 are not found in Pāipp. For the practical use of 59 with 52, see under the latter. ⌊Other uses under vs. 3.⌋ Verses 1 and 2, it will be noticed, are put together also in TS., and vs. 3 is not far off ⌊preceding 1 and 2⌋. In MS., on the other hand, vss. 2 and 3 have the same sequence as here; ⌊but in RV. their sequence is inverted⌋. ⌊As for the ritual use, cf. p. 896 and the table.⌋
Translated: Griffith, ii. 317.
1. Thou, O Agni, art protector of vows among gods (?), among mortals; thou art to be praised at the sacrifices.
2. If we, O gods, detract from (pra-mī) your [ordained] courses—we that are very unknowing, of you that are knowing—let Agni the all-devouring fill that up, knowing, and the soma that has entered the Brahmans.
The first three pādas are RV. x. 2. 4 a-c, found also in TS. i. 1. 14$^4$ and MS. iv. 10. 2. All these read in c víçvam ā́ pṛṇāti; our viçvā́d (p. viçva॰át) can only be regarded as a corruption; the translation, however, follows it, as being the real Atharvan reading; SPP. adopts it in his text, against the comm., who reads and explains viçvam. The comm. agrees with RV. etc. further in giving pṛṇāti. As for the last pāda, we had it above as d of xviii. 3. 55; it is also a RV. phrase, and found elsewhere: see under that verse.
3. We have come unto the road of the gods, to convey (vah) along forward what we may be able; Agni [is] knowing; he shall make offering; he verily is hótar; he shall arrange the sacrifices (adhvará), he the seasons.
The verse is RV. x. 2. 3, and found also in TS. i. 1. 14$^3$, MS. iv. 10. 2, and ÇB. xii. 4. 4$^1$. These texts read in c, d sé ’d u hótā só adhv-, and all save ÇB. accent ánu in b. The comm's text also has the RV. reading se ’d u hotā. The verse, with the Atharvan readings in c, d, is found in full in Kāuç. 5. 12, in the parvan-ceremonies. In the same ceremonies it accompanies in Vāit. 3. 5 an offering to Agni sviṣṭakṛt; and again, in Vāit. 19. 12, an after-offering to various gods. ⌊As for the critical significance of the citation of the vs. in sakalapāṭha, see p. 897, ¶3.⌋
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book XIX/Hymn 60

60. For physical abilities.
[Brahman.—dvyṛcam. mantroktavāgādidāivatam. 1. pathyābṛhatī; 2. kakummatī purauṣṇih.]
⌊Prose.⌋ As was noticed above, the hymn is wanting in Pāipp. Hymns 60-63, both text and explication, are lacking in the comm. The comm., at p. 517$^5$, assigns only fourteen hymns to this the final anuvāka; ⌊but at p. 552$^9$ he numbers the last hymn as the thirteenth, having combined hymns 69 and 70 of the Berlin ed. into one of 5 vss. (pañcamantrātmakaṁ sūktam, p. 548$^1$): both numbers are at variance with the⌋ eighteen of the mss. ⌊in general: but see under h. 65⌋ and of the Anukr. The hymn is quoted in Kāuç 66. 1 in the savayajña chapter ⌊see table on p. 896⌋; the mss. of Kāuç. read āsyan ⌊like the AV. mss.⌋.
Translated: Griffith, ii. 317.
1. Speech in my mouth, breath in my nostrils, sight in my eyes, hearing in my ears, my hair not gray, my teeth not broken, much strength in my arms.
2. Force in my thighs, speed in my calves, firm standing in my feet, all things of mine uninjured, myself not down-fallen.
⌊Passing in silence some minor details of variation,⌋ the mss. read ója instead of ójas ⌊but ójaḥ is found in two or three pada-mss.⌋; ⌊about ten authorities⌋ leave jan̄ghayos unaccented; they accent jávas or javás, and pā́dayos or pādáyos; some insert a blundering avasāna between pā́dayoḥ and pratiṣṭhā́; ⌊all accent ariṣṭā́ni instead of ár-;⌋ and end with sárvān mā́ ’tipṛṣṭhāḥ or -ṣṭhā (p. áti॰pṛṣṭhā or -āḥ). SPP. follows our emendations quite closely: but he corrects to ján̄ghayos; accents javás (which is rather to be preferred*); ⌊accents correctly pā́dayos: the accent of the Berlin ed. should be amended accordingly;⌋ leaves the avasāna after pā́dayoḥ; and forgets in saṁhitā-text to combine pratiṣṭhā́ and áriṣṭāni into pratiṣṭhā́ ’ris-; the mss., however, commit the same oversight, although the pada-text reads prati॰sthā́ (not -ā́ḥ). The blunder arises possibly from the transference of the avasāna-sign from its proper place after pratiṣṭhā́ (to which our text restores it) to the place before that word. The metrical definitions of the Anukr. for these two bits of prose are naturally worthless, and the extensive emendations in our text make them still more inapplicable. *⌊In RV. the masc. javá is oxytone, and the neuter jávas is paroxytone; but at iii. 50. 2 and iv. 27. 1 we have the adjective stem javás: cf. Gram. §1 151. 2. e.⌋
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume V/Appendix/Anonymous Treatise on Re-baptism/Note by the Edinburgh Translator

Note by the Edinburgh Translator.
Letters of Cyprian to Quintus, to Jubaianus, to Pompey, on “the baptism of heretics;” and to Magnus on “baptizing the Novatians, and those who obtain grace on a sick-bed,” may be found translated in Ep. lxx. (p. 377, supra), Ep. lxxii. (p. 379, supra), Ep. lxxiii. (p. 386, supra), and Ep. lxxv. (p. 397, supra), respectively; and the Letter of Firmilian to Cyprian against the Letter of Stephen, at p. 390, supra, Ep. lxxiv. All these letters are repeated, in extenso, in the Monumenta Veterum.
Eusebius says, by way of introduction to the fragment of a letter written to Stephen by Dionysius of Alexandria, as follows: “Dionysius indited to Stephen the first of those letters which were written on the subject of baptism, when no small controversy had arisen whether they who are converted from any kind of heresy ought to be purged by baptism (because an ancient custom had prevailed, that in receiving such there should only be hands laid upon them, with prayers). Cyprian, who then ruled the Church of Carthage, was the first who judged that they must not be admitted to communion unless they were first purified from error by baptism.  But Stephen, thinking that nothing should be innovated contrary to the tradition which had already obtained in that matter from the beginning, was indignant at this. And as Dionysius had already written many letters to him on this argument, he intimates to him finally, that all the churches everywhere, now that the fury of persecution was abated, detesting the turbulent novelty of Novatian, had established peace with one another.”

## Footnotes

* ↑ Eusebius calls him Novatus.
* ↑ See H. E., book viii. chaps. ii., iii, and iv.; and vol. vi., this series.
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume V/Caius/Fragments of Caius/From a Dialogue or Disputation Against Proclus

Fragments of Caius.
I.—From a Dialogue or Disputation Against Proclus.
I.
(Preserved in Eusebius’ Eccles. Hist., ii. 25.)
And I can show the trophies of the apostles. For if you choose to go to the Vatican or to the Ostian Road, you will find the trophies of those who founded this church.
II.
(In the same, iii. 28.)
But Cerinthus, too, through revelations written, as he would have us believe, by a great apostle, brings before us marvellous things, which he pretends were shown him by angels; alleging that after the resurrection the kingdom of Christ is to be on earth, and that the flesh dwelling in Jerusalem is again to be subject to desires and pleasures. And being an enemy to the Scriptures of God, wishing to deceive men, he says that there is to be a space of a thousand years for marriage festivals.
III.
(In the same, iii. 31.)
And after this there were four prophetesses, daughters of Philip, at Hierapolis in Asia. Their tomb is there, and that, too, of their father.

## Footnotes

* ↑ A defender of the sect of the Cataphrygians.
* ↑ So Jerome, in the Epistle to Marcellus, says: “There, too, is a holy church; there are the trophies of the apostles and martyrs.”
* ↑ The mss. and the Chronicon of Georgius Syncellus read Vasican, Βασικανόν.  The reference is to the Vatican as the traditional burial place of Peter, and to the Ostian Road as that of Paul.
* ↑ [Vol. i. pp. 351–352, 416.]
* ↑ This extract is taken from the Disputation of Caius, but the words are those of Proclus, as is shown by the citation in Eusebius.
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume V/Caius/Title Page

Caius.
[Translated by the Rev. S. D. F. Salmond, M.A.]
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume V/Appendix/Title Page

Appendix.
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume V/Caius
## Contents

* Title Page
* Introductory Notice to Caius, Presbyter of Rome
* Fragments of Caius
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume V/Caius/Fragments of Caius/Elucidations

Elucidations.
I.
(Psalms and hymns, p. 601.)
I subjoin as an elucidation, to which I have suffixed references of my own, a valuable note of the Edinburgh editor, which is found on p. 156 of vol. ix. in that series: “From this it appears that it was a very ancient custom in the Church to compose hymns and psalms in honour of Christ. Pliny, in his letter to Trajan, also states that the Christians were accustomed to meet together and sing hymns to Christ.  Hippolytus also may be understood to refer to these hymns and psalms towards the close of his oration on the end of the world, where he says: ‘Your mouth I made to give glory and praise, and to utter psalms and spiritual songs.’ A hymn of this kind in honour of Jesus Christ, composed by Clement of Alexandria, is extant at the end of his books entitled Pædagogi.”
II.
(The Dialogue between himself and Proclus, p. 600.)
I have been unable to get a copy of the work of John de Soynes on Montanism, which possibly throws some light upon the Dialogue with Proclus, attributed to him by Photius. It is praised by Adolf Harnack, and highly spoken of by English critics. It was a Hulsean prize essay, published Cambridge, 1878.

## Footnotes

* ↑ The Rev. S. D. F. Salmond, M. A.
* ↑ “Soliti essent Christiani, stato die, ante lucem convenire, carmenque Christo, quasi Deo, dicere secum invicem. Compare (Greek) Eph. v. 19 and Col. iii. 16.  Lardner gives Pliny’s letter entire, vol. vii. p. 22.
* ↑ Sec. xlvi. p. 254, supra.
* ↑ Vol. ii. p. 295, this series.
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume V/Caius/Fragments of Caius
## Contents

* From a Dialogue or Disputation Against Proclus
* Against the Heresy of Artemon
* Canon Muratorianus
* Elucidations
# Battle of Waterloo (Neilson)

Paisley: J. Neilson, page 1
Battle of
Waterloo,
To which are added,
Lawrie O’Broom’s Rambles
AND
The Plough Boy.
Paiſley: printed by J Neilson.
* The Battle of Waterloo
* Lawrie O'Broom's Rambles from Ireland to Scotland
* The Plough Boy
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Battle of Waterloo (diary accounts)

diary accounts
THE BATTLE
OF
WATERLOO.
CONTAINING, THE
Duke of Wellington’s Dispatch To Earl Bathurst,
ALSO,
THE FLIGHT FROM BRUSSELS.
AND A
Visit to the field of Battle,
With a Description of
The Engagement;
AND A
VISIT TO THE FRENCH HOSPITALS.
STIRLING:
PRINTED AND SOLD BY M. RANDALL.
* Duke of Wellington's Dispatch, to Earl Bathurst
* Flight from Brussels
* Visit to the field of battle
* Description of the Battle of Waterloo
* Visit to the French hospitals
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantis

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Atlantis."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, travel guide, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Atlantis, a poem by Guy Wetmore Carryl
* Atlantis, a poem by Clark Ashton Smith
# Atlantis: The Antediluvian World

Atlantis: The Antediluvian World is a book published in 1882 by Minnesota populist politician Ignatius L. Donnelly. Donnelly considered Plato's account of Atlantis as largely factual and attempted to establish that all known ancient civilizations were descended from this lost land.
THE PROFILE OF ATLANTIS, As revealed by the deep-sea soundings of H. M. ship "Challenger," and the U. S. ship "Dolphin."
ATLANTIS:
THE ANTEDILUVIAN WORLD.
BY
IGNATIUS DONNELLY.
ILLUSTRATED.
"The world has made such comet-like advance Lately on science, we may almost hope, Before we die of sheer decay, to learn Something about our infancy; when lived That great, original, broad-eyed, sunken race, Whose knowledge, like the sea-sustaining rocks, Hath formed the base of this world's fluctuous lore."
Festus.
ELEVENTH EDITION.
NEW YORK:
HARPER & BROTHERS, FRANKLIN SQUARE.
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1882, by
HARPER & BROTHERS,
In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.
All rights reserved.
CONTENTS.
PART I.
THE HISTORY OF ATLANTIS
| Chap. | Page |
PART II.
THE DELUGE.
PART III.
THE CIVILIZATION OF THE OLD WORLD AND NEW COMPARED.
PART IV.
THE MYTHOLOGIES OF THE OLD WORLD A RECOLLECTION OF ATLANTIS.
PART V.
THE COLONIES OF ATLANTIS.
ILLUSTRATIONS.
* Page
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantio Works v. Brady Brady

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
107 U.S. 192
Atlantio Works v. Brady Brady
Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for Atlantic Works.
Albert A. Abbott, for Brady.
BRADLEY, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barcarolle

From the French Barcarolle.
Tell me, beautiful maiden,
 Whither wouldst thou away,
To what shore blossom-laden,
 Through the wind and the spray?
Oars of ivory are gleaming,
Silken banners are streaming,
 Golden-bright is the prow.
I’ve a page fair and minion,
For a sail a saint's pinion,
 And for ballast a bough.
Tell me, beautiful maiden,
 Whither wouldst thou away,
To what shore blossom-laden,
 Through the wind and the spray?
Tell me, what is thy pleasure,
A wide ocean to measure?
 A far island to claim?
Wreaths of snow-flowers to fashion,
Or to linger with passion
 Near the flower of the flame?
Tell me, beautiful maiden,
 Whither wouldst thou away,
To what shore blossom-laden,
 Through the wind and the spray?
“To the land ever vernal,
Where love liveth eternal,
 Ah, take me!” she sighs.
Sweet, this land of thy seeing
Hath no place and no being,
 Under any love skies!
# Barchester Towers

the second novel in Trollope's six-part Chronicles of Barsetshire series; first published in 1857
BARCHESTER TOWERS
BY
ANTHONY TROLLOPE
NEW YORK The Century Co. 1906
"'Shall I begin, ma'am?' said Harry"
PUBLISHERS' NOTE
Among minor English novelists Anthony Trollope occupies the foremost place. In fact, there are few of the greatest who excel him in originality and delicacy of humor and the faithful portrayal of character. His work lacks very little of being that of genius. He was born in 1815; spent the greater part of his life in the postal service, as inspector in Ireland, England, and abroad; and died in 1882. In 1862 he visited the United States, and on his return published an account of his travels which was of considerable service in correcting English opinions on American affairs.
"Barchester Towers," perhaps the best, certainly the most delightful, of his novels, was published in 1857. Its scene is the cathedral town of "Barchester" (suggested by Salisbury), about which cluster a number of his most fascinating tales. The life of this imaginary town—the doings of its ecclesiastical dignitaries and of their neighbors—Trollope reveals with the exactness of a local historian and with inimitable humor. "I had formed for myself," he says, "so complete a picture of the locality, had acquired so accurate a knowledge of the cathedral town and the county in which I had placed the scene, and had become by a long-continued mental dwelling in it so intimate with sundry of its inhabitants, that to go back to it and write about it again and again has become one of the delights of my life." To peruse what he wrote is certainly one of the delights of the reader of English fiction. As pictures of contemporary life Trollope's works are unsurpassed. They may, as has been truly said, "fall into temporary oblivion, but when the twentieth century desires to estimate the nineteenth, they will be disinterred and studied with an attention accorded to no contemporary work of the kind, except, perhaps, George Eliot's 'Middlemarch.' "
CONTENTS
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
From drawings by Hugh M. Eaton
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barbour v. Priest

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
103 U.S. 293
Barbour v. Priest
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. A. K. Dunn for the appellants.
Mr. N. N. Leyman, contra.
MR. JUSTICE MILLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Australian and Other Poems/Preface

PREFACE.
The author of the following poems died twenty-five years ago. Some of them appeared in various Sydney newspapers, while he was yet living, but many are now printed for the first time. Such exercises were rather the solace and diversion than the serious business of any portion of his literary career—a career which was, unfortunately, as brief as it was full of promise. Distinguished among the journalists of his day, he also made no unimportant mark in what may be termed the regular field of letters. His work on New South Wales, the publication of which, in London, was coincident with his death in that city, at the early age of thirty-three, is justly regarded as a permanently valuable contribution to Australian history. Besides this, he wrote a series of papers in the Empire ​newspaper on the Aborigines of Australia, which were considered to have shed much light on the manners and customs of that now almost extinct race. It is to be regretted that his death prevented the publication of those essays in book form.
Much that passes for brilliant poetry now-a-days is generally a matter of patience and labour, combined with verbal dexterity and what may be described as a skilful process of assimilation. The faculty alluded to may exist unmingled with a single particle of the genuine quality which it counterfeits. It was decidedly otherwise in Mr. Flanagan's case. That he possessed at least the poetic temperament in a strong degree there can be no doubt. Had he assiduously cultivated the gift he might possibly have struck a memorable note. As it is, there is in these fugitive productions not a little, perhaps, which even the most coldly critical reader can hardly fail to admire: a play of fancy which is occasionally ​very graceful; energetic and picturesque description; and, above all, a strain of feeling which is unaffectedly simple, generous, and manly.
For such readers, however, the volume is not intended, but chiefly for those to whom it will be a memorial of a friend whose kindly heart was not less calculated to inspire affection than his abilities were to command respect.
November, 1886.
# Bill Nye's Comic History of England/Appendix

APPENDIX.
WHILE Mr. Nye was prevented from writing by illness, the artist proceeded with the drawing of subjects which would obviously need to be illustrated in the progress of the history.
HENRY VIII. PLUNDERING THE CHURCHES AND MONASTERIES OF THEIR POSSESSIONS.
THE GREAT INFLUX OF GOLD AND SILVER FROM THE NEW WORLD CAUSED AN INCREASE IN THE PRICE OF COMMODITIES (1549).
THE CHERISHED OBJECT OF MARY WAS TO RESTORE THE CATHOLIC RELIGION, AND HER CHIEF COUNSELLORS WERE BISHOPS WERE GARDINER AND BONNER (1554).
QUEEN ELIZABETH (1558-1603).
SIR WALTER RALEIGH.
QUEEN ELIZABETH SIGNING THE DEATH-WARRANT OF MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS, 1587.
DEATH OF QUEEN ELIZABETH, MARCH 24, 1603. FOR TEN DAYS PREVIOUS TO HER DEATH SHE LAY UPON THE FLOOR SUPPORTED BY CUSHIONS.
DISCOVERY OF THE GUNPOWDER PLOT (1605).
EFFIGY OF GUY FAWKS.
THE SCOTS COULD NOT ENDURE ARCHBISHOP LAUD's RITUALISTIC PRACTICES, AND JENNY GEDDES THREW A STOOL AT HIS HEAD.
SIR WALTER RALEIGH, AT HIS EXECUTION, ASKED TO EXAMINE THE AXE. HE POISED IT, AND RUNNING HIS THUMB ALONG THE EDGE, SAID, WITH A SMILE, "THIS IS SHARP MEDICINE," ETC. (1618).
PRINCE CHARLES AND BUCKINGHAM TRAVEL TO SPAIN IN DISGUISE, SO THAT THE FORMES MIGHT PAY HIS ADDRESSES IN PERSON TO THE INFANTA.
CHARLES I. FORCED TO GIVE HIS ASSENT TO THE "PETITION OF RIGHTS" (1628).
OLIVER CROMWELL.
EARL OF STRAFFORD RECEIVING LAUD's BLESSING ON THE WAY TO EXECUTION (1641).
SAMPLE PAGE OF ROUNDHEADS (1642).
LANDING OF WILLIAM, PRINCE OF ORANGE, AT TORBAY (1688).
THE DEATH OF MARY REVIVED THE HOPES OF THE FRIENDS OF JAMES II., AND CONSPIRACIES WERE FORMED.
GEORGE FOX.
GENERAL BANKRUPTCY AND RUIN FOLLOWED THE CLOSING OF THE EXCHEQUER OR TREASURY BY CHARLES II. (1673).
CHARLES II.
DUKE OF MONMOUTH IMPLORING FORGIVENESS OF JAMES II. (1685).
CHARLES II. CONCEALED IN THE "ROYAL OAK," WHILE HIS PURSUERS PASSED UNDER HIM (1651).
OLIVER CROMWELL IN DISSOLVING PARLIAMENT SEIZED THE MACE, EXCLAIMING, "TAKE AWAY THIS BAUBLE!" (1653.)
A BOOK ENTITLED 'KILLING NO MURDER' BOLDLY ADVISING THE REMOVAL OF THE USURPER, CAUSED CROMWELL CEASELESS ANXIETY (1658.)
# Blackburn v. Crawfords/Dissent Clifford

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Clifford
United States Supreme Court
70 U.S. 175
Blackburn v. Crawfords
Mr. Justice CLIFFORD dissenting.
I dissent from the judgment of the court in this case, and that is all I think it necessary to say in reply to several of the prominent topics discussed in the opinion of a majority of the court. But there are three propositions laid down in the opinion to which I desire specially to refer as not receiving my assent, because I think they are of some practical importance.
1. The Circuit Court admitted the church record, or evidence of its contents, after proof of its loss. The effect of the decision here is that it was not admissible. Unless I am greatly deceived, the ruling of the Circuit Court is sustained by all the authorities upon the subject. Apart from authorities it seems to me that it was correct in principle, as evidenced by the general course of practice.
2. Second proposition referred to has respect to the testimony of the attorney. I think it was properly excluded as falling within the rule of privileged communication; and I am also of the opinion that the suggestion of waiver is utterly without foundation or just pretence.
3. Reference is made in the third place to the construction given to the charge of the Circuit Court. Rightly interpreted, the charge, as it seems to me, is correct; but the opinion of the majority of the court places a construction upon it which I think does great injustice to the judge who presided at the trial.
Having stated the three propositions to which I dissent, I do not wish to add anything to the statement.
((PD-USGov}}