OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Men-at-the-Bar/Knightley, Charles Valentine

​Knightley, Charles Valentine, B.A. Christ Church, Oxon, goes the Midland circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 18 May, 1875 (then aged 22), called to the bar 7 May, 1879 (eldest son of Rev. Henry Charles Knightley, vicar of Wasperton, co. Warwick); born 22 July, 1853; married 26 April, 1883, Juliet Claudine, eldest dau. of T. W. Watson, Esq., of Lubenham, co. Leicester, and of Tile Barn, Berks (see Foster's Baronetage).
    20, Ovington Square, S.W.; 8, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.
# Midsummer Night's Dream (1918) Yale/Appendix D

Layout 2
APPENDIX D
Suggestions for Collateral Reading
Geoffrey Chaucer, The Knight's Tale.
W. W. Skeat, Shakespeare's Plutarch (1875). The Life of Theseus.
Frank Sidgwick, Sources and Analogues of 'A Midsummer-Night's Dream' (1908). This contains the story of Pyramus and Thisbe as told by Ovid and much Elizabethan material about Robin Goodfellow.
H. H. Furness, New Variorum Shakespeare: A Midsummer Night's Dream (1895).
C. C. Clarke, Shakespeare Characters (1863).
D. J. Snider, The Shakespearian Drama (1887). Midsummer Night's Dream.
G. C. D. Odell, 'A Midsummer Night's Dream' on the New York Stage, in Shaksperian Studies, ed. Matthews and Thorndike, Columbia University Press (1916).
# Midsummer Night's Dream (1918) Yale/Appendix C

Layout 2
APPENDIX C
The Text of the Present Edition
The text of the present volume is, by permission of the Oxford University Press, that of the Oxford Shakespeare, edited by the late W. J. Craig, except for the following deviations:
1. The stage directions are those of the First Folio or the First Quarto, any alterations or additions being enclosed in square brackets. The indication of a second scene in the fifth act has been omitted and the lines renumbered accordingly.
2. A few minor changes in punctuation and in spelling (such as almanac for almanack, gawd for gaud, laugh for loff, and antic for antique) have been made. The spelling lanthorn has been retained only in the speeches of Moon, where it adds clearness to a jest.
3. The following alterations, all reversions to the readings of the First Quarto (save where otherwise indicated), have been made in the text, the reading of the Quarto and the present text preceding the colon, and that of Craig following it:
I. i. 69 Whether: Whe'r
191 I'll: I'd
ii. 87 an (Q. and): as
II. i. 7 moon's: moone's
69 steep (F1): steppe
78 Perigenia: Perigouna
91 Hath: Have
249 where: whereon
ii. 2 third part: third (misprint ?)
III. i. 87 of: have
160 whether: whe'r
ii. 48 the: knee
81 whether: whe'r
97 costs: cost
​144 This: That (misprint ?)
171 to: with
190 bare: bear
199 sisters' vows (Q. sisters vowes): sister-vows
201 is all: is it all
204 needles: neelds
264 potion: poison
IV. i. 21 courtesy (F1): curtsy
86 Silence a while: Silence, awhile
172 as: as doth
179 a: in
V. i. 281 beams: streams
# Midsummer Night's Dream (1918) Yale/Text

Layout 2
A Midsummer Night's Dream
* Act I
* Act II
* Act III
* Act IV
* Act V
[DRAMATIS PERSONÆ
Theseus, Duke of Athens
Egeus, Father to Hermia
| Lysander, | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | in love with Hermia |
| Demetrius, | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | in love with Hermia |
Philostrate, Master of the Revels to Theseus
Quince, a Carpenter
Snug, a Joiner
Bottom, a Weaver
Flute, a Bellows-mender
Snout, a Tinker
Starveling, a Tailor
Hippolyta, Queen of the Amazons, betrothed to Theseus
Hermia, Daughter to Egeus, in love with Lysander
Helena, in love with Demetrius
Oberon, King of the Fairies
Titania, Queen of the Fairies
Puck, or Robin Goodfellow
| Pease-Blossom, | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \\\ \\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | Fairies |
| Cobweb, | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \\\ \\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | Fairies |
| Moth, | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \\\ \\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | Fairies |
| Mustard-seed, | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \\\ \\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | Fairies |
Other Fairies attending their King and Queen
Attendants on Theseus and Hippolyta
Scene: Athens, and a Wood near it.]
# Men-at-the-Bar/Miller, Alexander Edward

​Miller, Alexander Edward, LL.D., Q.C., legal member of Railway Commission since Feb., 1877, B.A., Trin. Coll., Dublin, 1852, scholar 1849, first gold medallist mathematics and physics, second gold medallist classics 1851, LL.D. (hon.) 1875, equity and real property examiner London Univ. 1873-8, a student of Lincoln's Inn 23 Jan., 1852 (then aged 23), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1854, studentship Nov., 1854, Q.C. 8 Feb., 1872, bencher 8 May, 1872 (only son of Alexander Miller, Esq., of Ballycastle, co. Antrim); born 29 Aug., 1828; married 23 Aug., 1859, Elizabeth, elder dau. of Charles Albert Creery, Esq., of New Castle, co. Down.
    Clonard, Stanmore.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Miller, George (b.1833)

​Miller, George, M.A. (late fellow), Trin. Hall., Camb., 1867, assistant secretary education department since 1884, senior examiner 1872-84, examiner 1865-72, a student of Lincoln's Inn 28 May, 1860 (then aged 26), called to the bar 6 June, 1863 (4th son of Rev. Sir Thomas Combe Miller, Bart., of Froyle, Hants); born 7 July, 1833; married 25 July, 1865, Mary Elizabeth, eldest dau. of Rev. Peter Aubertin rector of Chipstead, Surrey (see Foster's Baronetage).
    Howard House, Ashstead, Epsom.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Miller, Granville George

​Miller, Granville George, B.A., Trin. Hall, Camb., 1874, a student of the Inner Temple 3 Nov., 1873 (then aged 24), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1876 (youngest son of late Robert Miller, serjeant-at-law); born , 1849.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Miller, George (b.1815)

​Miller, George, LL.B., Trin. Hall, Camb., 1843, went the South-eastern circuit, a student of Lincoln's Inn 23 Nov., 1836 (then aged 21), called to the bar 4 May, 1843 (youngest son of Thomas Miller, Esq., of Croydon, Surrey); born , 1815.
    Church Street, Croydon; 23, Old Buildings, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Miles, Herbert Scott Gould

​Miles, Herbert Scott Gould, major royal Munster rifles since 1881, garrison instructor on the staff at Aldershot since 1881, a student of the Inner Temple 14 April, 1877, (then aged 26), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1880 (youngest son of Major-Genl. William Miles, E.I.C.S.); born 31 July, 1850.
    Aldershot; Naval and Military Club.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Milford, Henry

​Milford, Henry, a student of Gray's Inn 1 May, 1850, called to the bar 30 April, 1853 (3rd son of William Milford, Esq., of city of Durham); born , .
    Durham.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Miller, Albert Birmingham

​Miller, Albert Birmingham, B.A., Pembroke Coll., Camb., 1864, a member of the council of the lieut.-governor of Bengal 1884, official assignee of insolvent debtors' court, Calcutta, a student of the Middle Temple 28 Oct., 1863, called to the bar 6 June, 1866 (4th son of Robert Miller, serjeant-at-law?); born , .
    Calcutta.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Millar, Frederick Charles James

​Millar, Frederick Charles James, Q.C., B.A. London Univ. 1854, a student of the Inner Temple 11 April, 1853 (then aged 25), certificate of honour Nov., 1855, studentship Jan., 1856, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1856, Q.C. 24 March, 1880, bencher 20 May, 1881 (only son of Frederick George Millar, of Brixton, Surrey); born , 1828; married 21 Dec., 1867, Clara L., eldest dau. of R. Phillips, Esq., of London, F.R.C.S.
    59, Kensington Gardens Square, W.; 2, New Square, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Millar, George Thomas John

​Millar, George Thomas John, M.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1883, a student of Lincoln's Inn 25 Jan., 1878 (then aged 22), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1881 (only son of John Millar, of London, physician); born , 1859.
    3, New Square, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Miller, Edward Alexander

​Miller, Edward Alexander, M.A. Exeter Coll., Oxon, B.A. 1877, a student of Lincoln's Inn 8 Nov., 1873 (then aged 19), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1878 (6th son of Taverner John Miller, of London, M.P.); born , 1854.
    Medstead House, Alresford, Hants; 9, Courtfield Road, Kensington S.W.
# Mills v. Brown

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
41 U.S. 525
Mills v. Brown

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mills v. County of St. Clair

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
49 U.S. 569
Mills v. County of St. Clair

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mills v. Alabama

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, quotes, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
384 U.S. 214
Mills v. Alabama
Argued: April 19, 1966. --- Decided: May 23, 1966
Kenneth Perrine and Alfred Swedlaw, Birmingham, Ala., for appellant.
Burgin Hawkins, Birmingham, Ala., and Leslie Hall, Montgomery, Ala., for appellee.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri Valley Land Company v. Wrich

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
208 U.S. 250
Missouri Valley Land Company v. Wrich
Argued: January 10, 1908. --- Decided: February 3, 1908
Mr. Charles A. Clark for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. James H. Van Dusen, Irving F. Baxter, and Edward F. Colladay for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada, 305 U.S. 337 (1938), was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that states that provide a school to white students must provide in-state education to blacks as well. States can satisfy this requirement by allowing blacks and whites to attend the same school or creating a second school for blacks. Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Dissenting Opinion

    McReynolds
United States Supreme Court
305 U.S. 337
Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada
Argued: Nov. 9, 1938. --- Decided: Dec 12, 1938
[Syllabus from pages 337-339 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Wm. S. Hogsett, of Kansas City, Mo., and Fred L. Williams, of St. Louis, Mo., for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 339-341 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri ex rel. Burnes National Bank of St. Joseph v. Duncan

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 17
Missouri ex rel. Burnes National Bank of St. Joseph v. Duncan
Argued: and Submitted April 11, 1924. --- Decided: April 28, 1924
Mr. J. D. Bowersock, of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 18-19 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Solicitor General Beck, of Washington, D. C., for the United States, as Amicus curiae.
Messrs. Morton Jourdan, of St. Louis, Mo., and Charles H. Mayer, of St. Joseph, Mo., for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 21 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri Valley Land Company v. Wrich/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
208 U.S. 250
Missouri Valley Land Company v. Wrich
Argued: January 10, 1908. --- Decided: February 3, 1908
This case was argued with Missouri Valley Land Co. v. Wiese, No. 101 [[[208 U.S. 234]], 52 L. ed. -, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 294], of this term, just decided, and in all essential particulars the two cases are alike. Wrich purchased his land in 1881 from the Union Pacific Railroad Company, and received his deed in 1890. The land lay within overlap grants to the Union Pacific Company and the Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Company. Wrich took possession immediately after his purchase, and ever afterwards held and claimed the land as his own. In September, 1893, he undertook to make a cash entry of the land under the act of 1887 [24 Stat. at L. 556, chap. 376, U.S.C.omp. Stat. 1901, p. 1595], as did his neighbor, Wises. All the questions involved in the Wiese Case are present in this, and, for the reasons given in the opinion in the former, the judgment of the Supreme Court of Nebraska in this case must be affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri ex rel. Barrett v. Kansas Natural Gas Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 298
Missouri ex rel. Barrett v. Kansas Natural Gas Company
Argued: April 21, 1924. --- Decided: May 26, 1924
Mr. J. W. Dana, of Kansas City, Mo., for Kansas City Gas Co. and Public Service Commission of Missouri.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 299-303 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Robert D. Garver and H. O. Caster, both of Bartlesville, Okl., for Kansas Natural Gas Co.
Messrs. Frank E. Atwood, of Carrollton, Mo., John M. Garfield, of Cleveland, Ohio, Jesse W. Barrett and James D. Lindsay, both of Jefferson City, Mo., and L. H. Breuer, of Rolla, Mo., for the State of Missouri and Missouri Public Service Commission.
Mr. F. S. Jackson, of Topeka, Kan., for Helm.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri Ry Co v. Dinsmore/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
108 U.S. 30
Missouri Ry Co v. Dinsmore
This motion to dismiss is made because, as is alleged, (1) the decree appealed from is not a final decree; and (2) the transcript is not properly certified.
1. As to the decree. The case is in some particulars different from that of the St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Southern Express Co., just decided, but in our opinion the differences do not materially affect the present question.
Ante, 6. The decree in this case, as in that, requires the railway company to carry for the express company, and fixes the rate of compensation, 'until the further order or decree of this [circuit] court.' In this case, the reference to the master 'to take and state an account between the parties as to the compensation that should be and has been paid during the litigation, and up to the final termination thereof,' was entered before or at the time of the decree from which the appeal was taken. Still, in this, as in that, the reference is in respect to matters affecting the administration of the cause, and does not involve the merits. The reservation of power to change the rates operates only on the future, and was evidently intended for the purpose of enabling the court to act in case a change should be required. As the decree stands, the express company can require the railway company to carry at the rate which has been fixed.
2. As to the certificate. The clerk certifies the transcript sent up to be 'a true, full, and perfect copy from the record of all the proceedings in the suit.' Certainly this is sufficient for all the purposes of jurisdiction. If, in point of fact, the certificate is not true, the remedy is by certiorari to supply deficiencies, and not by motion to dismiss.
To meet this view of the case the appellee suggests diminution, and asks for a certiorari to bring up 'the evidence taken before * * * William H. Rossington, as examiner, * * * remaining on file in the office of the clerk, constituting the exhibits, depositions, and proofs used on the argument of the cause in the * * * circuit court.'
Upon the face of the decree it appears that the case was disposed of on demurrer to the bill. If that be the truth, the evidence on file is not necessary for the hearing of the appeal, but as the record, which is here, has not been printed in full, and the parties do not agree in their statements as to what it contains, we will grant the certiorari asked for, reserving all further questions until the return is made.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri Valley Land Company v. Wiese

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
208 U.S. 234
Missouri Valley Land Company v. Wiese
Argued: January 10, 1908. --- Decided: February 3, 1908
Mr. Charles A. Clark for plaintiffs in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 234-237 intentionally omitted]
Messrs.James H. Van Dusen, Irving F. Baxter, and Edward F. Colladay for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri Trust Company v. Krumseig

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
172 U.S. 351
Missouri Trust Company v. Krumseig
In May, 1894, Theodore M. Krumseig and Louise Krumseig filed in the district court of the Eleventh judicial district of Minnesota a bill of complaint against the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Company, a corporation of the state of Missouri, praying that, for reasons alleged in the bill, a certain mortgage made by complainants on the 5th day of September, 1890, and delivered to the defendant, and by it recorded, and certain notes therein mentioned, might be canceled, and the defendant be permanently enjoined from enforcing the same. The defendant thereupon, by due proceedings, removed the cause to the circuit court of the United States for the district of Minnesota, where the Union Trust Company of Philadelphia was made a co-defendant, and the case was so proceeded in that, on October 22, 1895, a final decree was entered, granting the prayers of the complainants, declaring the said mortgage and notes to be void, and enjoining the defendants from ever taking any action or proceeding for their enforcement. 71 Fed. 350.
From this decree an appeal was taken to the circuit court of appeals for the Eighth circuit, where, on November 5, 1896, the decree of the circuit court was affirmed. 23 C. C. A. 1, 77 Fed. 32. On March 20, 1897, on petition of the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Company, a writ of certiorari was awarded, whereby the record and proceedings in said cause were brought for review into this court.
Wm. C. White, for petitioner.
J. B. Richards, for respondent.
Mr. Justice SHIRAS, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri Railway Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
256 U.S. 610
Missouri Railway Company v. United States
Argued: April 26, 1921. --- Decided: June 6, 1921
Messrs. Alexander Britton and Evans Browne, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Messrs. Assistant Attorney General Davis, J. Robert Anderson, of Washington, D. C., and Assistant Attorney General Stewart, for appellee.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri Ry Co v. Dinsmore

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
108 U.S. 30
Missouri Ry Co v. Dinsmore
A. T. Britton, J. H. McGowan, Thos. J. Porter, John F. Dillon, Wager Swayne, and A. L. Williams, for appellant.
Clarence A. Seward, for appellee.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri River

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Missouri River."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Missouri River," in The American Cyclopædia (1879)
* "Missouri River," in The New International Encyclopædia, New York: Dodd, Mead and Co. (1905)
* "Missouri River," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Missouri (river)," in The New Student's Reference Work, Chicago: F.E. Compton and Co. (1914)
* "Missouri (river)," in Collier's New Encyclopedia, New York: P. F. Collier & Son Co. (1921)
# Missouri State Life Insurance Company v. Jones

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
290 U.S. 199
Missouri State Life Insurance Company v. Jones
Argued: Nov. 8, 1933. --- Decided: Dec 4, 1933
Messrs. Allen May, of St. Louis, Mo., and Paul B. Cromelin and Bolitha J. Laws, both of Washington, D.C., for petitioners.
Mr. Tom Poe, of Little Rock, Ark., for respondent.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Merivale, Reginald

​Merivale, Reginald, B.A., St. John's Coll., Camb., 1S74, a student of Lincoln's Inn 10 June, 1873 (then aged 21), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1877 (eldest son of John Lewis Merivale, a registrar of the High Court of Chancery); born , 1852.
    2, Norfolk Square, W.; 3, Stone Buildings, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Metcalfe, Douglas Metcalfe

​Metcalfe, Douglas Metcalfe, a member of the Western circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 1 May, 1872 (then aged 18), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1875 (2nd son of His Honour William James Metcalfe, Q.C, county court judge); born , 1854; married 6 Dec., , Mary Hyacinth, younger dau. of Rev. Tom Arthur Voules, M.A., rector of Beer-Crocombe and of North and South Bradon, Somerset.
    Albion Chambers, Bristol; 4, Plowden Buildings, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Merivale, Herman Charles

​Merivale, Herman Charles, actor and dramatic author, B.A. Balliol Coll., Oxon, went the Western circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 21 March, 1860 (then aged 21), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1864 (only son of late Herman Merivale, C.B., of London); born 27 Jan., 1839; married 13 May, 1878, Elizabeth, dau. of John Pitman, gent, (see Foster's Baronetage, Robinson).
# Men-at-the-Bar/Merton, Joseph Sidney

​Merton, Joseph Sidney, matric. Edinburgh Univ., a student of the Middle Temple 10 June, 1879, called to the bar 3 May, 1882 (only son of Sidney Merton, of London, gent.); born , .
    187, Maida Vale, W.; 4, Temple Gardens, E.C.