OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 69

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 414th meeting, by 9 votes to 1 (Egypt), with 1 abstention (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) on 4 March 1949
The Security Council,
Having received and considered the applications of Israel for membership in the United Nations, [1]
1. Decides in its judgement that Israel is a peace-loving State and is able and willing to carry out the obligations contained in the Charter, and accordingly,
2. Recommends to the General Assembly that it admit Israel to membership in the United Nations.
[1] See Official Records of the Security Council, Third Year, Supplement for December 1948, document S/1093; and ibid., Fourth Year, Supplement for March 1949, document S/1267.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 703

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted unanimously by the Security Council at its 3002nd meeting, on 9 August 1991 ([1])
The Security Council,
Having examined the application of the Federated States of Micronesia for admission to the United Nations,
Recommends to the General Assembly that the Federated States of Micronesia be admitted to membership in the United Nations.
[1] Adopted without vote.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 68

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 408th meeting, by 9 votes to none, with 2 abstentions (Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics), on 10 February 1949
The Security Council,
Resolves that General Assembly resolution 192 (III) of 19 November 1948, as contained in document S/1216, [1] be transmitted to the Commission for Conventional Armaments for action according to its terms.
[1] See Official Records of the Security Council, Fourth Year, Supplement for January 1949.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 7

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
7 (1946). Resolution of 26 June 1946
Whereas the Security Council on 29 April 1946 appointed a Sub-Committee to investigate the situation in Spain, and
Whereas the investigation of the Sub-Committee has fully confirmed the facts which led to the condemnation of the Franco régime by the Potsdam and San Francisco Conferences, by the General Assembly at the first part of its first session and by the Security Council by resolution of the date mentioned above [resolution 4 (1946)],
The Security Council
Decides to keep the situation in Spain under continuous observation and maintain it upon the list of matters of which it is seized, in order that it will be at all times ready to take such measures as may become necessary to maintain international peace and security. Any member of the Security Council may bring the matter up for consideration by the Council at any time.
* Adopted at the 49th meeting.$^{[1]}$
[1] The draft resolution was adopted in parts. No vote was taken on the text as a whole.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 70

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 415th meeting, by 8 votes to none, with 3 abstention (Egypt, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) on 7 March 1949
Whereas Article 83, paragraph 3, of the Charter of the United Nations provides:
    “The Security Council shall, subject to the provisions of the trusteeship agreements and without prejudice to security considerations, avail itself of the assistance of the Trusteeship Council to perform those functions of the United Nations under the trusteeship system relating to political, economic, social, and educational matters in the strategic areas”,
The Security Council,
Resolves:
1. That the Trusteeship Council be requested, subject to the provisions of trusteeship agreements or parts thereof in respect of strategic areas, and subject to the decisions of the Security Council made having regard to security considerations from time to time, to perform in accordance with its own procedures, on behalf of the Security Council, the functions specified in Articles 87, and 88 of the Charter relating to political, economic, social and educational advancement of the inhabitants of such strategic areas;
2. That the Trusteeship Council be requested to send to the Security Council, one month before forwarding to the Administering Authority, a copy of the questionnaire formulated in accordance with Article 88 of the Charter and any amendments to such questionnaire which may be made from time to time by the Trusteeship Council;
3. That the Secretary-General be requested to advise the Security Council of all reports and petitions received from or relating to strategic areas under trusteeship, and to the Trusteeship Council for examination and report to the Security Council;
4. That the Trusteeship Council be requested to submit to the Security Council its reports and recommendations on political, economic, social and educational matters affecting strategic areas under trusteeship.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 702

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted unanimously by the Security Council at its 3001st meeting, on 8 August 1991 ([1])
The Security Council,
Having examined separately the applications of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and of the Republic of Korea for admission to the United Nations,
1. Recommends to the General Assembly that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea be admitted to membership in the United Nations;
2. Recommends to the General Assembly that the Republic of Korea be admitted to membership in the United Nations.
[1] Adopted without vote.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Midwest Video Corporation
## Concurring Opinion

    Burger

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
Supreme Court of the United States
406 U.S. 649
United States et al. v. Midwest Video Corp.
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
No. 71-506. Argued: April 19, 1972 --- Decided: June 7, 1972
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) promulgated a rule that "no CATV system having 3,500 or more subscribers shall carry the signal of any television broadcast station unless the system also operates to a significant extent as a local outlet by cablecasting [i.e., originating programs] and has available facilities for local production and presentation of programs other than automated services." Upon challenge of respondent, an operator of CATV systems subject to the new requirement, the Court of Appeals set aside the regulation on the ground that the FCC had no authority to issue it.
Held: The judgment is reversed. Pp. 659-675.
441 F. 2d 1322, reversed.
MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, joined by MR. JUSTICE WHITE, MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL, and MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN, concluded that:
    1. The rule is within the FCC's statutory authority to regulate CATV at least to the extent "reasonably ancillary to the effective performance of the COmmission's various responsibilities for the regulation of television broadcasting," United States v. Southwestern Cable Co., 392 U.S. 157, 178. Pp. 659-670.
    2. In the light of the record in this case, there is substantial evidence that the rule, with its 3,500 standard and as it is applied under FCC guidelines for waiver on a showing of financial hardship, will promote the public interest within the meaning of the Communications Act of 1934. Pp. 671-675.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE concluded that until Congress acts to deal with the problems brought about by the emergence of CATV, the FCC should be allowed wide latitude. Pp. 675-676.
BRENNAN, J., announced the Court's judgment and delivered an opinion in which WHITE, MARSHALL, and BLACKMUN, JJ., joined. BURGER, C. J., filed an opinion concurring in the result, post, p. 675. DOUGLAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which STEWART, POWELL, and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined, post, p. 677.
Deputy Solicitor General Wallace argued the cause for the United States et al. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Griswold, Richard B. Stone, John W. Pettit, and Edward J. Kuhlmann.
Harry M. Plotkin argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Wayne W. Owen, George H. Shapiro, and David Tillotson.
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by William J. Scott, Attorney General, Peter A. Fasseas, Special Assistant Attorney General, and Roland S. Hornet, Jr., for the State of Illinois; by Paul Rodgers for the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners; and by Melvin L. Wulf for the American Civil Liberties Union.
# United States v. Miller (223 U.S. 599)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
223 U.S. 599
United States v. Miller (223 U.S. 599)
Argued: January 9, 1912. --- Decided: February 26, 1912
Solicitor General Lehmann for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 599-601 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Alexander A. Lawrence, William W. Osborne, and M. Hampton Todd for defendants in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 601 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Van Devanter delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Miller

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Miller."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Miller (208 U.S. 32), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
* United States v. Miller (223 U.S. 599), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
* United States v. Miller (307 U.S. 174), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
* United States v. Miller (??? U.S. ???), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
   * listing incomplete
# United States v. Miller (208 U.S. 32)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
208 U.S. 32
United States v. Miller
Argued: December 16, 1907. --- Decided: January 6, 1908
Solicitor General Hoyt, Assistant Attorney General Van Orsdel, and Mr. John Q. Thompson for appellant.
Messrs. George A. King and William B. King for appellee.
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. New River Company Slab Fork Coal Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 533
United States v. New River Company Slab Fork Coal Company
Argued: April 24, 1924. --- Decided: June 9, 1924
Mr. Blackburn Esterline, of Washington, D. C., for the United states.
Mr. J. Carter Fort, of Washington, D. C., for appellant Interstate Commerce Commission.
Mr. G. T. Bell, of Washington, D. C., for appellants Slab Fork Coal Co. and others.
Mr. James W. Carmalt, of Washington, D. C., for appellees.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. New River Collieries Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
262 U.S. 341
United States v. New River Collieries Company
Argued: March 7, 8, 1923. --- Decided: May 21, 1923
The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Riter, for the United States.
Mr. Ira Jewell Williams, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. New Orleans Pacific Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
248 U.S. 507
United States v. New Orleans Pacific Railway Company
Argued: Dec. 10 and 11, 1918. --- Decided: Jan 27, 1919
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Francis J. Kearful, for the United states.
[Argument of Counsel from page 508-509 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Mark Norris, of Grand Rapids, Mich., F. G. Hudson, of Monroe, La., and H. H. White, of Alexandria, La., for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from page 509-510 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Catto

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
384 U.S. 102
United States v. Catto
Argued: March 22, 23, 1966. --- Decided: April 26, 1966
See 384 U.S. 981, 86 S.Ct. 1857.
Jack S. Levin, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Claiborne B. Gregory and Gordon G. Hawn, San Antonio, Tex., for respondents.
Mr. Justice STEWART delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Castro

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
65 U.S. 346
United States v. Castro
THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the northern district of California.
The title of Castro is set forth in the opinion of the court.
It was argued by Mr. Stanton (Attorney General) for the United States, and Mr. Edward Swann for the appellees.
Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Castillero (67 U.S. 17)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
67 U.S. 17
United States v. Castillero

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Castillero

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Castillero."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Castillero (64 U.S. 464)
* United States v. Castillero (67 U.S. 17)
# United States v. Castillero (64 U.S. 464)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
64 U.S. 464
United States v. Castillero
THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the southern district of California.
The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
The claim was confirmed by the board of commissioners, and likewise by the District Court. The United States appealed to this court, where it was argued by Mr. Stanton for the appellants.
Mr. Justice CLIFFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Treaty Series/Volume 1/2

II
Treaties and international agreements
filed and recorded from 14 December 1946 to 31 March 1947 Nos. 1 to 11
# United Nations Treaty Series/Volume 1/2/4

No. 4
UNITED NATIONS and LEAGUE OF NATIONS
French official text communicated by the Secretary-General of the United Nations. The filing and recording took place on 14 December 1946.
Mr. Sean Lester, Secretary-General of the League of Nations, and Mr. Wlodzimierz Moderow, Director, Representative of the Secretary-General of the United Nations in Geneva:
Note that, in application of the Common Plan, approved by a resolution of the General Assembly of the United Nations, dated 12 February 1946, and by a resolution of the Assembly of the League of Nations, dated 18 April 1946, and of a subsequent Agreement dated 19 July 1946, concerning the execution of the transfer to the United Nations of certain assets of the League of Nations, the following operations were effected on 1 August 1946:
1. The transfer of rights in respect of the League of Nations buildings and other immovable property was effected on 1 August 1946, and the necessary entries having been made this day in the Land Register of the Republic and Canton of Geneva.
2. The transfer of the ownership and possession of the movable property was also effected on 1 August 1946.
In accordance with Article 6 of the Agreement of 19 July 1946, the movable objects transferred have been listed in an inventory drawn up by the League of Nations which is in course of being verified by the United Nations. A protocol will be drawn up placing on record the completion of this operation.
3. A final valuation of the assets will be made in accordance with the terms of the Common Plan. It will be the subject of a special protocol.
(Signed) Sean Lester
W. Moderow
Geneva, 1 August 1946.
# United Nations Treaty Series/Volume 1/1/9

No. 9
SWEDEN
Instrument of adherence to the United Nations. 19 November 1946
French official text communicated by the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Sweden. The registration ex officio by the Secretariat of the United Nations took place on 14 December 1946.
​No. 9. INSTRUMENT OF ADHERENCE BY SWEDEN TO THE UNITED NATIONS
19 November 1946
The Government of the Kingdom of Sweden having received from the Secretary-General of the United Nations the information that the General Assembly of the United Nations has approved the application for membership of Sweden hereby presents to the Secretary-General this instrument of adherence, in accordance with rule 116 of the provisional rules of procedure for the General Assembly.
The Government of the Kingdom of Sweden hereby states that it accepts the obligations contained in the Charter of the United Nations.
(Signed) Oesten Unden