OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 29/Section 284

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 284. Damages
Upon finding for the claimant the court shall award the claimant damages adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by the infringer, together with interest and costs as fixed by the court.
When the damages are not found by a jury, the court shall assess them. In either event the court may increase the damages up to three times the amount found or assessed. Increased damages under this paragraph shall not apply to provisional rights under section 154(d) of this title.
The court may receive expert testimony as an aid to the determination of damages or of what royalty would be reasonable under the circumstances.

## Source

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 813; Pub. L. 106-113, div. B, Sec. 1000(a)(9) [title IV, Sec. 4507(9)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A-566.)

## Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., Secs. 67 and 70, part (R.S. 4919; R.S. 4921, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 391, Sec. 6, 29 Stat. 694, (2) Feb. 18, 1922, ch. 58, Sec. 8, 42 Stat. 392, (3) Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 726, Sec. 1, 60 Stat. 778).
This section consolidates the provisions relating to damages in R.S. 4919 and 4921, with some changes in language.

## Amendments
### 1999

Second par. Pub. L. 106-113 inserted at end “Increased damages under this paragraph shall not apply to provisional rights under section 154(d) of this title.”

#### Effective Date of 1999 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 106-113 effective Nov. 29, 2000, and applicable only to applications (including international applications designating the United States) filed on or after that date, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, Sec. 4508] of Pub. L. 106-113, as amended, set out as a note under section 10 of this title.
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 29/Section 286

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 286. Time limitation on damages
Except as otherwise provided by law, no recovery shall be had for any infringement committed more than six years prior to the filing of the complaint or counterclaim for infringement in the action.
In the case of claims against the United States Government for use of a patented invention, the period before bringing suit, up to six years, between the date of receipt of a written claim for compensation by the department or agency of the Government having authority to settle such claim, and the date of mailing by the Government of a notice to the claimant that his claim has been denied shall not be counted as part of the period referred to in the preceding paragraph.

## Source

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 813.)

## Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., Sec. 70, part (R.S. 4921, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 391, Sec. 6, 29 Stat. 694, (2) Feb. 18, 1922, ch. 58, Sec. 8, 42 Stat. 392, (3) Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 726, Sec. 1, 60 Stat. 778).
The first paragraph is the same as the provision in R.S. 4921 with minor changes in language, with the added provision relating to the date for counterclaims for infringement.
The second paragraph is new and relates to extending the period of limitations with respect to suits in the Court of Claims in certain instances when administrative consideration is pending.
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 29/Section 288

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 288. Action for infringement of a patent containing an invalid claim
Whenever, without deceptive intention, a claim of a patent is invalid, an action may be maintained for the infringement of a claim of the patent which may be valid. The patentee shall recover no costs unless a disclaimer of the invalid claim has been entered at the Patent and Trademark Office before the commencement of the suit.

## Source

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 813; Pub. L. 93-596, Sec. 1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949.)

## Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., Sec. 71 (R.S. 4922).
The necessity for a disclaimer to recover on valid claims is eliminated. See section 253.
Language is changed.

## Amendments
### 1975

Pub. L. 93-596 substituted “Patent and Trademark Office” for “Patent Office”.

#### Effective Date of 1975 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 93-596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93-596, set out as a note under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
# United States Department of Agriculture Emergency Crop and Feed Loans v. Remund

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
330 U.S. 539
United States Department of Agriculture Emergency Crop and Feed Loans v. Remund
Argued: and Submitted Feb. 5, 1947. --- Decided: March 17, 1947
Mr. Paul A. Sweeney, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Dwight Campbell, of Aberdeen, S.D., for respondent.
Mr. Justice MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Declaration of Independence

* related portals: Constitutional documents, United States Congress.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, quotes, textbook, Wikidata item.
The United States Declaration of Independence is a statement adopted by the Second Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, announcing that the Thirteen Colonies then at war with Great Britain were no longer a part of the British Empire. Written primarily by Thomas Jefferson, the Declaration is a formal explanation of why Congress had voted on July 2 to declare independence from Great Britain, more than a year after the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War. The birthday of the United States of America—Independence Day—is celebrated on July 4, the day the wording of the Declaration was adopted by the Congress.
Congress issued the Declaration in several forms. The first published version was a typeset broadside printed by John Dunlap, which only listed the names of John Hancock and Charles Thomson as signers. In 1777, Congress issued the Goddard Broadside, which listed all of the signers. What became the most famous version of the Declaration was a handwritten copy signed by the delegates, known as the engrossed version, which is on display in the National Archives in Washington, D.C.
The Declaration of Independence is the first of the three Charters of Freedom along with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Related documents:
The Declaration of Independence ǀ The Articles of Confederation ǀ The Constitution ǀ The Bill of Rights ǀ Other Amendments ǀ Unsuccessful Amendments
* "Original Rough Draught" of the Declaration of Independence by Thomas Jefferson (1776).
* Draft of the Declaration of Independence by John Adams and Thomas Jefferson (1776).
* United States Declaration of Independence, broadside printed by John Dunlap (1776).
* United States Declaration of Independence, broadside printed by Mary Katherine Goddard (1776).
* United States Declaration of Independence, broadside printed by John Holt (1776) (transcription project).
* United States Declaration of Independence, broadside printed by Ezekiel Russell (1776) (transcription project).
* United States Declaration of Independence, copy engrossed on parchment by Timothy Matlack (1776).
* Declaration of Independence in United States Statutes at Large, Volume 1 (1845).
* Declaration of Independence as printed prefacing the first California statute book.
* Declaration of Independence used as a cryptographic key in The Beale Papers (1885).
# United States Department of Agriculture v. Moreno

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Department of Agriculture v. Moreno, 413 U.S. 528 (1973), is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the "unrelated person" provision of the Food Stamp Act was irrelevant to its stated purpose and did not operate to rationally further the prevention of fraud; thus, the act violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

## Concurring Opinion

    Douglas

## Dissenting Opinion

    Rehnquist
Supreme Court of the United States
413 U.S. 528
United States Department of Agriculture v. Moreno
Certiorari to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
No. 72-534 Argued: April 23, 1973 --- Decided: June 25, 1973
Section 3(e) of the Food Stamp Act of 1964, as amended in 1971, generally excludes from participation in the food stamp program any household containing an individual who is unrelated to any other household member. The Secretary of Agriculture issued regulations thereunder rendering ineligible for participation in the program any "household" whose members are not "all related to each other." Congress stated that the purposes of the Act were "to safeguard the health and well-being of the Nation's population and raise levels of nutrition among low-income households...[and] that increased utilization of food in establishing and maintaining adequate national levels of nutrition will promote the distribution...of our agricultural abundance and will strengthen our agricultural economy...." The District Court held that the "unrelated person" provision of § 3 (e) creates an irrational classification in violation of the equal protection component of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
Held: The legislative classification here involved cannot be sustained, the classification being clearly irrelevant to the stated purposes of the Act and not rationally furthering any other legitimate governmental interest. In practical operation, the Act excludes, not those who are "likely to abuse the program," but, rather, only those who so desperately need aid that they cannot even afford to alter their living arrangements so as to retain their eligibility. Pp. 533-538.
345 F.Supp. 310, affirmed.
Brennan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Douglas, Stewart, White, Marshall, Blackmun, and Powell, JJ., joined. Douglas, J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 538. Rehnquist, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Burger, C. J., joined, post, p. 545.
A. Raymond Randolph, Jr., argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wood, Walter H. Fleischer, and William Kanter.
Ronald F. Pollack argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief was Roger A. Schwartz.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/69/4

| United Nations | A/RES/69/4 |
| General Assembly | Distr.: General 14 October 2014 |
Sixty-ninth session Agenda item 136
* Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 9 October 2014 [on the report of the Fifth Committee (A/69/428)] 69/4. Scale of assessments for the apportionment of the expenses of the United Nations: requests under Article 19 of the Charter
The General Assembly
Having considered chapter V of the report of the Committee on Contributions on its seventy-fourth session,
Reaffirming the obligation of Member States under Article 17 of the Charter of the United Nations to bear the expenses of the Organization as apportioned by the General Assembly,
1. Reaffirms its role in accordance with the provisions of Article 19 of the Charter of the United Nations and the advisory role of the Committee on Contributions in accordance with rule 160 of the rules of procedure of the General Assembly;
2. Also reaffirms its resolution 54/237 C of 23 December 1999;
3. Requests the Secretary-General to continue to bring to the attention of Member States the deadline specified in resolution 54/237 C, including through an early announcement in the Journal of the United Nations and through direct communication;
4. Urges all Member States requesting exemption under Article 19 of the Charter to submit as much information as possible in support of their requests and to consider submitting such information in advance of the deadline specified in resolution 54/237 C so as to enable the collation of any additional detailed information that may be necessary;
5. Agrees that the failure of the Comoros, Guinea-Bissau, Sao Tome and Principe and Somalia to pay the full minimum amount necessary to avoid the application of Article 19 of the Charter was due to conditions beyond their control;
6. Decides that the Comoros, Guinea-Bissau, Sao Tome and Principe and Somalia shall be permitted to vote in the General Assembly until the end of its sixty-ninth session.
22nd plenary meeting 9 October 2014
_______________
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/8th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 1

Chapter Ⅰ.—An Act making a further appropriation for carrying into effect the treaty of amity, commerce and navigation, between his Britannic Majesty and the United States of America.
Appropriation for carrying into effect the seventh article of the treaty between England and the United States.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That a sum not exceeding seventy thousand dollars, be, and the same hereby is appropriated, to be paid under the direction of the President of the United States out of any monies in the treasury, not otherwise appropriated, for the purpose of carrying into effect the seventh article of the treaty of amity, commerce and navigation between his Britannic Majesty and the United States of America.
Approved, November 24, 1804.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/8th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 18

Chap. XVIII.—An Act supplementary to the act intituled “An act to regulate the collection of duties on imports and tonnage.”
Act of March 2, 1799, ch. 22. The same terms of credit for the payment of duties on goods imported by sea from foreign places, north of the equator, and on the eastern shores of America, as are allowed on West India articles.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the same terms of credit, ​which are granted by law, for the payment of duties on articles the produce of the West Indies, and no other, shall be allowed on goods, wares and merchandise imported by sea into the United States from all foreign ports and islands lying north of the Equator, and situated on the eastern shores of America, or in its adjacent seas, bays and gulfs.
Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That it shall be lawful for any ship or vessel to proceed with any goods, wares or merchandise, brought in her, and which shall in the manifest delivered to the collector of the customs, be reported as destined or intended for any foreign port or place, from the district within which such ship or vessel shall first arrive, to such foreign port or place, without paying or securing the payment of any duties upon such goods, wares or merchandise, as shall be actually re-exported in the said ship or vessel:Vessels may proceed with their foreign cargoes to foreign ports, or places, free of duties. Proviso. 1799, ch. 22. Provided, that such manifest so declaring to re-export such goods, wares, or merchandise, shall be delivered to such collector, within forty-eight hours after the arrival of such ship or vessel. And, Provided also, that the master or commander of such ship or vessel shall give bond as required by the thirty-second section of the act, intituled “An act to regulate the collection of duties on imports and tonnage.”
Approved, February 22, 1805.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/8th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 10

Chap. X.—An Act making an appropriation for completing the south wing of the Capitol, at the City of Washington, and for other purposes.
Appropriation for completing the south wing of the Capitol, to be applied under the direction of the President.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That a sum not exceeding one hundred and ten thousand dollars, shall be, and the same is hereby appropriated, to be applied under the direction of the President of the United States, towards completing the south wing of the Capitol, at the city of Washington.
Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That a sum not exceeding twenty thousand dollars, shall be, and the same is hereby appropriated, to be applied under the direction of the President of the United States, to such necessary alterations and repairs, as he may deem requisite, in the north wing of the Capitol, and other public buildings at the city of Washington; which said sums shall be paid out of any monies in the treasury, not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, January 25, 1805.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/8th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 15

Chap. XV.—An Act for carrying into more complete effect the tenth article of the treaty of friendship, limits and navigation with Spain.
Cargoes of Spanish vessels, arriving in distress in the U. States, may be reshipped in other vessels without any charges, &c. Act of March 2, 1799, ch. 22. sec. 60, vol. i. 672.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That whenever any Spanish vessel shall arrive in distress, in any port of the United States, having been damaged on the coasts, or within the limits of the United States, and her cargo shall have been unladen, in conformity with the provisions of the sixtieth section of the act, intituled “An act to regulate the collection of duties on imports and tonnage,” the said cargo, or any part thereof, may, if the said ship or vessel should be condemned, as not sea worthy, or be deemed incapable of performing her original voyage, afterwards be re-laden on board any other vessel or vessels, under the inspection of the officer who superintended the landing thereof, or other proper person. And no duties, charges, or fees whatever, shall be paid on such part of the cargo, as may be re-laded and carried away, either in the vessel in which it was originally imported, or in any other whatever.
Collector of Norfolk to refund certain duties on goods reshipped which were landed from the Spanish brig Nancy. Proviso.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the collector of the district of Norfolk, in Virginia, shall be, and he hereby is authorized and required to refund to the owners or agents of the Spanish brigantine Nancy, (which vessel arrived in distress at that port, in the year one thousand eight hundred and four) the amount of the duties secured by him on such part of her cargo as was re-exported: Provided, that the debenture or debentures issued by the said collector for the drawback of the duties on the exportation of the said cargo, shall be duly surrendered to him, and cancelled.
Approved, February 14, 1805.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/8th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 16

Chap. XVI.—An Act authorizing the Postmaster-General to make a new contract for carrying the mail from Fayetteville, in North Carolina, to Charleston, in South Carolina.
Postmaster-General authorized to make a new contract for carrying the mail between Fayetteville and Charleston. Proviso.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Postmaster-General shall be, and hereby is authorized to make a new contract for carrying the mail in a line of stages between the town of Fayetteville, in the state of North Carolina, and the city of Charleston, in the state of South Carolina, upon such terms and conditions as he may deem most conducive to the interest of the United States: Provided, that he does not exceed the sum of four thousand two hundred dollars, annually, beyond the amount of the present contract; and that no contract made in virtue of this act shall extend beyond the time to which the present contract extends.
Approved, Feb. 14, 1805.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/8th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 17

Chap. XVII.—An Act making appropriations for the support of the Military establishment of the United States, for the year one thousand eight hundred and five.
Specific appropriations.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That for defraying the expense of the military establishment of the United States, for the year one thousand eight hundred and five; for the Indian department; and for the expense of fortifications, arsenals, magazines, and armories, the following sums be, and the same hereby are respectively appropriated, that is to say:—
For the pay of the army of the United States, three hundred and two thousand seven hundred and ninety-six dollars.
For forage, four thousand four hundred and eighty-eight dollars.
For the subsistence of the officers of the army and corps of engineers, thirty-one thousand three hundred and twenty-nine dollars, and fourteen cents.
For the subsistence of non-commissioned officers, musicians, and privates, one hundred and seventy-nine thousand and nine dollars, and sixty-nine cents.
For clothing, eighty-five thousand dollars.
For bounties and premiums, fifteen thousand dollars.
For the medical and hospital department, twelve thousand dollars.
For camp equipage, fuel, tools, expense of transportation, and other contingent expenses of the war department, eighty-one thousand dollars.
For fortifications, arsenals, magazines and armories, one hundred and thirty-three thousand two hundred and ninety-six dollars, and eighty-eight cents.
For purchasing maps, plans, books, and instruments for the war department, and military academy, five hundred dollars.
For the pay and subsistence of the commandants in Louisiana, five thousand nine hundred and seventy-one dollars, and seventy-seven cents.
For the Indian department, ninety-two thousand six hundred dollars.
Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the several appropriations herein before made, shall be paid and discharged out of any monies in the treasury, not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, Feb. 14, 1805.