OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# McGee v. International Life Insurance Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
McGee v. International Life Insurance Co., 355 U.S. 220 (1957), was a case following in the line of decisions interpreting International Shoe v. Washington. The Court declared that California did not violate the Due Process Clause by entering a judgment upon a Texas insurance company who was engaged in a dispute over a policy it maintained with a California resident. The importance of this finding is highlighted by the facts of the case; mainly that International Life Insurance did no other business within the state of California besides maintaining this single policy, which the company became responsible for by its acquisition of another insurance company which previously had held the policy. However; the case never explicitly stated that no other business was conducted within California and the previous assumption is presumptive by definition. Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
355 U.S. 220
McGee v. International Life Insurance Company
Argued: Nov. 20, 1957. --- Decided: Dec 16, 1957
Mr. Arthur J. Mandell, Houston, Tex., for the petitioner.
Mr. Stanley Hornsby, Austin, for the respondent.
Opinion of the Court by Mr. Justice BLACK, announced by Mr. Justice DOUGLAS.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McGautha v. California (398 U.S. 936)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Wikipedia article
United States Supreme Court
398 U.S. 936
McGautha v. California
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition which reads as follows:
'1. Does California's practice of allowing capital trial juries absolute discretion, uncontrolled by standards or directions of any kind, to impose the death penalty upon a defendant convicted of the crime of murder violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?'
Case transferred to the appellate docket and placed on the summary calendar.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McGautha v. California (402 U.S. 183)/Dissent Black

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Black Douglas Brennan
United States Supreme Court
402 U.S. 183
McGautha v. California
Argued: Nov. 9, 1970. --- Decided: May 3, 1971
Separate opinion of Mr. Justice BLACK.
I concur in the Court's judgments and in substantially all of its opinion. However, in my view, this Court's task is not to determine whether the petitioners' trials were 'fairly conducted.' Ante, at 221. The Constitution grants this Court no power to reverse convictions because of our personal beliefs that state criminal procedures are 'unfair,' 'arbitrary,' 'capricious,' 'unreasonable,' or 'shocking to our conscience.' See, e.g., Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165, 174, 72 S.Ct. 205, 210, 96 L.Ed. 183 (1952) (Black, J., concurring); United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 243, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 1940-1941, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967) (Black, J., concurring and dissenting). Our responsibility is rather to determine whether petitioners have been denied rights expressly or impliedly guaranteed by the Federal Constitution as written. I agree with the Court's conclusions that the procedures employed by California and Ohio to determine whether capital punishment shall be imposed do not offend the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Likewise, I do not believe that petitioners have been deprived of any other right explicitly or impliedly guaranteed by the other provisions of the Bill of Rights. The Eighth Amendment forbids 'cruel and unusual punishments.' In my view, these words cannot be read to outlaw capital punishment because that penalty was in common use and authorized by law here and in the countries from which our ancestors came at the time the Amendment was adopted. It is inconceivable to me that the framers intended to end capital punishment by the Amendment. Although some people have urged that this Court should amend the Constitution by interpretation to keep it abreast of modern ideas, I have never believed that lifetime judges in our system have any such legislative power. See Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663, 670, 86 S.Ct. 1079, 1083, 16 L.Ed.2d 169 (1966) (Black, J., dissenting).

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mammalia in interglacial deposits

Science, Vol. 5, No. 112 (March 27, 1885), Letters to the Editor, p. 248.
Mammalia in interglacial deposits.
May I be permitted to ask aid from some American contributor to Science who follows the lore of glacial geology? I learn that some American glacialists are satisfied that there have been two periods of glaciation, and I would inquire whether the interglacial deposits contain, like those of Switzerland, remains of mammalia, and if so, what they are. Any reference to American evidence on these points would oblige
The Camp, Sunningdale, Eng., Feb 27.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mamdouh Habib's CSR Tribunal Recorder Exhibit List

* related portals: Guantanamo.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
From page 16 of http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/publicly_filed_CSRT_records_3291-3416.pdf#16
The bullets refer to the numbered allegations in the Summary of Evidence memo.
* FOUO
* Recorder Exhibit List
* For
    #TitleBulletClassification R1Unclassified SummaryUNCLASSIFIED R2FBI Redaction of National Security Information3.a.3UNCLASSIFIED R3US District Court Case of Mamdouh HabibUNCLASSIFIED R4US District Court Case of Mamdouh HabibUNCLASSIFIED R5U.S. Department of Homeland Security, "Terrorist Organization Reference Guide" (Jan. 04 ed,) excerpt 3.a.4. 3.a.5.UNCLASSIFIED R6Intelligence Information Report (IIR) 6 034 0565 023.a.1. 3.a.2.SECRET//NOFORN R7Intelligence Information Report (IIR) 6 034 0547 033.a.1.SECRET//NOFORN R8ClTF Form 40 dtd 7 May 03 (redacted copy)3.a.1.FOUO//LES R9Knowledgeability Brief (KB) dtd 11 May 023.a.2.SECRET R10FBI 302 dtd 24 May 03 (redacted copy)3.a.3.FOUO//LES RllIntelligence Information Report (IIR) 6 034 0454 023.a.5. SECRET//NOFORN R12Intelligence Information Report (IIR) 6 034 0488 033.a.6. SECRET//NOFORN RI3ClTF Form 40 dtd 11 Mar 03 (redacted copy)3.a.4. 3.b.1.FOUO//LES R14Intelligence Assessment (DTG 271545Z MAY 023.b.2SECRET R15Intelligence Information Report (IIR) 6 034 0497 033.b.3. SECRET//NOFORN R16Intelligence Information Report (IIR) 6 034 0482 033.b.3. SECRET//NOFORN R17Quarterly Review of Community Counterterrorism Tiers3.a.4. :3.a.5.SECRET//NOFORN R18CITF Memorandum dtd 26 April 64SummarySECRET//NOFORN R19Baseball Card: DetaineeSECRET//NOFORN
# Mamie

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Mamie."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Mamie", a poem by Carl Sandburg
* The Mamie (1880), a United States Supreme Court case
# McClure's Magazine/Volume 18/Number 1/Thoughts

From November 1901, p. 58
THOUGHTS.
By Winifred Webb.
Grim wrestlers on the field of fate, They strive together, round and round; What men call deeds of love and hate Are but their shadows on the ground.
# McClure's Magazine/Volume 19/Number 4/Allurement

from August 1902, p. 338
FROM yonder hedge, from yonder spray, He calls me onward and away. Broad lies the world and fair to see; The cuckoo calls—is calling me.
I have not seen or heard of Care, Who used my very bed to share, Since that first morn, when airily The cuckoo, calling, called to me.
My sweetheart's face? I have forgot. My mother? But she calls me not. From the sweet bank, from the dim lea, The cuckoo calls—is calling me.
And I must go—I may not choose; No gain there is, nor aught to lose; And soon—say, now—on some wild tree, The bird sits long and waits for me.
# McClure's Magazine/Volume 18/Number 1/The Intercepted Salute

From November 1901, p. 47
THE INTERCEPTED SALUTE.
A little maiden met me in the lane, And smiled a smile so very fain, So full of trust and happiness, I could not choose but bless The child, that she should have such grace To laugh into my face.
She never could have known me; but I thought It was the common joy that wrought Within the little creature's heart, As who should say: "Thou art As I; the heaven is bright above us; And there is God to love us. And I am but a little gleeful maid, And thou art big, and old, and staid; But the blue hills have made thee mild As is a little child.
Wherefore I laugh that thou may'st see— O laugh! O, laugh with me!"
A pretty challenge! Then I turned me round, And straight the sober truth I found. For I was not alone; behind me stood, Beneath his load of wood, He that of right the smile possessed— Her father manifest.
O, blest be God! that such an overplus Of joy is given to us; That that sweet innocent Gave me the gift she never meant, A gift secure and permanent! For, howsoe'er the smile had birth, It is an added glory on the earth.
# McGovern v. City of New York

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
229 U.S. 363
McGovern v. City of New York
Argued: and submitted November 8, 1912. --- Decided: June 9, 1913
Messrs. Edward A. Alexander, George Gordon Battle, J. J. Darlington, and Jerome H. Buck for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 364-369 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Louis C. White, William McM. Speer, and Archibald R. Watson for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McGovern v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
235 U.S. 389
McGovern v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company
Argued: November 30, 1914. --- Decided: December 14, 1914
Mr. George Demming for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 390-395 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. William Clarke Mason and Charles Heebner for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 395-397 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McGowan v. American Pressed Tan Bark Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
121 U.S. 575
McGowan v. American Pressed Tan Bark Company
T. D. Lincoln, Geo. Hoadly, E. M. Johnson, and Edwd. Colston, for plaintiffs in error.
Thos. McDougall and E. W. Kittredge, for defendants in error.
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bunting, Percy William

​Bunting, Percy William, M.A. Pembroke Coll., Camb., examiner in equity and real property law London Univ. since 1882, a student of Lincoln's Inn 15 April, 1859 (then aged 23), called to the bar 11 June, 1862 (only son of Thomas Percival Bunting, of Manchester, solicitor); born , 1836; married 21 June, 1869, Mary Hyett, 2nd dau. of late John Ledgett, Esq., of Tunbridge Wells.
    18, Endsleigh Gardens, N.W.; 11, Old Square, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bunyon, Charles John

​Bunyon, Charles John, M.A., Corpus Christi Coll., Camb., 1846, author of Law of Fire Insurance, of Law of Life Insurance, and Profitable Book on Domestic Law, a student of the Inner Temple 10 June, 1843 (then aged 22), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1849 (only son of late Robert John Bunyon, Esq., of London); born , 1821; married 27 May, 1846, Eliza, 2nd dau. of R. H. Sawyer, Esq., of London.
    37, Phillimore Gardens, W.; 19, Serjeants' Inn, Fleet Street, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bunny, Brice Frederick

​Bunny, Brice Frederick, practises before the supreme court at Melbourne, a student of Lincoln's Inn 21 March, 1839 (then aged 19), called to the bar 2 May, 1844 (2nd son of Jeré Bunny, Esq., of Newbury, Berks); born , 1820.
    Melbourne, Victoria.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Burbury, Samuel Hawksley

​Burbury, Samuel Hawksley, M.A. (fellow), St. John's Coll., Camb., 1857, a student of Lincoln's Inn 6 Oct., 1855 (then aged 24), called to the bar 7 June, 1858 (only son of Samuel Burbury, Esq., of Warwick); born 18 May, 1831; married April, 1860, Alice, eldest dau. of Thomas Edward Taylor, Esq., J.P., D.L.
    12, Upper Phillimore Gardens, Kensington, W.; 1, New Square, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Burd, William

​Burd, William, a student of the Middle Temple 18 June, 1878, called to the bar 29 June, 1881 (only son of John Burd, of Mount Zion, Lancashire, gentleman); born ,
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bunnajee

​Bunnajee (see Banaji).
# Men-at-the-Bar/Burch, Augustus Edgar

​Burch, Augustus Edgar, matric. London Univ. 1846, a student of the Middle Temple 13 March, 1847, called to the bar 19 April, 1850 (youngest son of Thomas Lever Burch, of Canterbury, gentleman); born , ; married 27 Oct., 1853, Emily, only surviving dau. of Rev. Jeremiah Jackson, M.A., vicar of Elm-cum-Emneth and prebendary of Brecon.
    Bedford.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Burchell, James

​Burchell, James, M.A., Corpus Christ! Coll., Camb., 1847, a student of the Inner Temple 7 June, 1843 (then aged 22), called to the bar 30 April, 1847 (eldest son of James Burchell, Esq., of London); born , 1821; married 5 Sept., 1850, Amicia, youngest dau. of late Jonathan Hayne, of London.
    31, Gordon Square, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Burder, John Winsland

​Burder, John Winsland, undergrad. Magdalen Hall, Oxon, a member of the Northern circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 18 Nov., 1867 (then aged 21), called to the bar 10 June, 1870 (eldest son of John Burder, of Manchester, solicitor); born , 1846; married 20 Sept., 1876, Eliza, dau. of W. Douglas, Esq., of likley Hall, Yorks.
    24, Talbot Road, W.; 1, Harcourt Buildings, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Burdon, Cotsford

​Burdon, Cotsford, B.A. Lincoln Coll., Oxon, equity draftsman and conveyancer, J.P. co. Durham, a student of the Middle Temple 26 Jan., 1839, called to the bar there 28 Jan., 1842, admitted a barrister of Lincoln's Inn ad eundem 3 March, 1842 (4th son of Rowland Burdon, Esq., of Castle Eden, co. Durham); born 4 Aug., 1815; married 19 April, 1852, Eleanor Margaret Jane Pemberton, youngest dau. of Thomas Thompson, Esq., of Bishopwearmouth, co. Durham, and has issue.
    Parkhurst House, Haslemere, Surrey.
# McLaughlin v. Bank of Potomac

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
48 U.S. 220
McLaughlin v. Bank of Potomac

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McLaren v. Fleischer

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
256 U.S. 477
McLaren v. Fleischer
Argued: April 26 and 27, 1921. --- Decided: June 1, 1921
Mr. Samuel Herrick, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Mr. Patrick H. Loughran, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McLane v. King/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
144 U.S. 260
McLane v. King
The foreclosure proceedings transferred the legal title to the bridge to King & Son, and rendered the stock of the bridge company valueless. A transfer of the latter, if now possible, would be of no benefit to the plaintiffs, and is not desired by them. That it was supposed to be of value when the contract was made, and that it is now worthless, creates no liability against the Kings, unless they have wrongfully destroyed that supposed value. But it is not alleged that King & Son did not give full value for the notes and mortgage, or that they were illegally issued by the bridge company, or that they were paid in whole or in part, or that suit was brought before they matured, or a recovery obtained for a larger amount than was due. In other words, it is not shown that King & Son did other than exercise a legal right of collecting a just debt by foreclosure of the mortgage given to secure it. By so doing, they exposed themselves to no liability to others for the indirect result of such legal act. The allegation that it was done with a fraudulent intent and purpose to obtain possession of the bridge amounts to nothing. If the act was legal, it is not made illegal by a mere epithet.
So far as respects the charge that it was the understanding ans agreement that the stock should be good and valuable stock, worth fully dollar for dollar in the public market, it is enough to say that the contract, which is in writing, and attached to the bill, contains no such provision. There in no stipulation whatever expressed or suggested in that contract other than for the transfer of this specified stock. Ruckman took the chances of its value.
The decision of the circuit court was right, and the decree is affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McLaughlin Brothers v. Hallowell

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
228 U.S. 278
McLaughlin Brothers v. Hallowell
Argued: January 27, 1913. --- Decided: April 7, 1913
Messrs. Edgar A. Morling, Charles A. Clark, and William H. Morling for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Denis M. Kelleher, William S. Kenyon, and Maurice O'Connor for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice Pitney delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Browne, William

​Browne, William, M.A., Balliol Coll., Oxon, 1840, a student of Lincoln's Inn 15 Jan., 1839 (then aged 26), called to the bar 27 Jan., 1843 (eldest son of William Browne, Esq., of Tallantire Hall, Cumberland); born 9 July, 1810; married 28 Feb., 1847, Isabella, only dau. of Robert Midford, Esq., of London, and has issue.
    Tallantire Hall, Cockermouth.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Browne, William Edward Nicholson

​Browne, William Edward Nicholson, undergrad. Magdalen Hall, Oxon, a student of the Inner Temple 14 Nov., 1868 (then aged 22), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1871 (only son of William Ruddle Browne, of Chisledon House, Swindon, Wilts); born , 1846; married 28 Dec., 1871, Catherine, eldest dau. of William Bagley, Esq., of London.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Browning, Robert Jardine

​Browning, Robert Jardine, M.A. Lincoln Coll., Oxon, goes the Midland circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 14 Nov., 1874 (then aged 21), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1879 (eldest son of Robert Shergold Browning, of London Road, Leicester); born , 1853.
    4, Harcourt Buildings, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Broxholm, Frederick Alleyn

​Broxholm, Frederick Alleyn, M.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1878, matric. London Univ. 1869, a member of the South-eastern circuit, a student of the Middle Temple 24 May, 1870, called to the bar 10 May, 1876 (only son of Frederick Giles Broxholm, M.D., M.R.C.S., L.S.A., etc.); born 24 Jan., 1852; married 24 Aug., 1876, Sarah Carter, dau. of Robert Sage Ellis, Esq., M.R.C.S., of Willingham, co. Camb.
    Rosendale, The Avenue, Beckenham; 5, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Browning, Charles

​Browning, Charles, a student of Lincoln's Inn 31 Oct., 1862 (then aged 24), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1866 (3rd son of John Browning, Esq., of Melbourne); born , 1838.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Browning, Edward Campbell

​Browning, Edward Campbell, M.A. Christ Church, Oxon, of London, merchant, went South-eastern circuit, a student of Lincoln's Inn 4 Nov., 1858 (then aged 22), called to the bar 30 April, 1862 (2nd son of Henry Browning, Esq., of London); born , 1836; married 3 April, 1873, Alice Louisa, dau. of late James Pratt-Barlow, Esq., and has issue (see Foster's Baronetage).
    35, Onslow Square, S.W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bruce, Alexander Carmichael

​Bruce, Alexander Carmichael, assistant commissioner of metropolitan police 1884, undergrad. Brasenose Coll., Oxon, a member of the North-eastern circuit, a student of Lincoln's Inn 4 May, 1872 (aged 21), called to the bar 30 April, 1875 (4th son of Rev. David Bruce, of Merrington House, co. Durham, hon. canon of Durham Cathedral); born , 1851.
    10, Marloes Road, W.; 3, Plowden Bldgs., Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Browne, William Moxon

​Browne, William Moxon, B.A. Trin. Coll., Camb., from Eton (king's scholar), a member of the Oxford circuit, a student of Lincoln's Inn 1 June, 1871 (then aged 20), called to the bar 7 June, 1875 (3rd son of Octavius Browne, Esq., late of Courtlands, Devon); born 6 Dec., 1850; married 15 Aug., 1878, Jane Archer, youngest dau. of late Rev. F. J. Kendall, rector of Talland, Cornwall.
    45 Argyle Road, Kensington, W.; 6, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bruce, Gainsford

​Bruce, Gainsford, Q.C., recorder of Bradford since 1877, solicitor-general county palatine of Durham since 1878, a member of the North-eastern circuit, member of the Bar Committee since Dec., 1883, educated at Glasgow Univ., one of the authors of Williams and Bruce's Admiralty Practice and of Maude and Pollock on the Law of Merchant Shipping, contested Gateshead 1880 and Newcastle-on-Tyne 1883, law reporter for Incorporated Council 186–-75, a student of the Middle Temple 15 Nov., 1856, called to the bar 10 June, 1859, Q.C., 1883 (eldest son of John Collingwood Bruce, of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, doctor of laws and schoolmaster); born , 1834; married , 1868, Sophia, dau. of Francis Jackson, Esq., of Chertsey.
    Yewhurst, Bromley, Kent; 2, Harcourt Buildings, Temple, E.C.; St. Stephen's Club.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bruce, Hon. Thomas Charles

​Bruce, Hon. Thomas Charles, M.P., M.A., Jesus Coll., Camb., 1850, late capt. 32nd Middlesex rifle volunteers, M.P. Portsmouth since 1874, a student of the Inner Temple 19 April, 1851 (then aged 26), called to the bar 9 June, 1854 (4th son of Thomas, 7th earl of Elgin and 11th earl of Kincardine); born 15 Feb., 1825; married 19 Nov., 1863, Sarah Caroline, eldest dau. of Thomas Thornhill, Esq., of Riddlesworth Hall, Norfolk, and has issue (see Foster's Peerage).
    42, Hill Street, W.; Carlton and Athenæum Clubs.