OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Executive Order No. 3 of the Chairman of the Philippine Executive Commission

OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMISSION
MALACAŃAN PALACE
EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 3
CONTINUING UNTIL FURTHER ORDERS THE DAYLIGHT-SAVING TIME FOR THE PHILIPPINES
Pursuant to the authority conferred upon me as Head of the Central Administrative Organization by Order No. 1 of the Commander-in-Chief of the Imperial Japanese Forces in the Philippines, the daylight-saving time for the Philippines established under Proclamation No. 789, dated December 13, 1941, is hereby continued until further orders.
Done in the City of Greater Manila, Philippines, this 31st day of January, 1942.
(Sgd.) JORGE B. VARGAS Chairman of the Executive Commission
Source: Official Gazette. Manila, Philippines. Vol. 1. Bureau of Printing. 1942. p. 14.
This work is in the public domain because it is a work of the Philippine government (see Republic Act No. 8293 Sec. 176).
All official Philippine texts of a legislative, administrative, or judicial nature, or any official translation thereof, are ineligible for copyright.
An additional license tag is required in order to demonstrate why this work is freely licensed or in the public domain in the United States.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order No. 400 (1942)

amended by Executive Order No. 58, s. 1945
Layout 2
MALACAÑAN PALACE
MANILA
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINES
EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 400
CREATING THE CITY OF GREATER MANILA
Pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the Philippines, the City of Greater Manila is hereby created. Its territory shall include the present City of Manila, the Quezon City, and all the territory comprised in the municipalities of Caloocan, San Juan, Mandaluyong, Makati, Pasay, and Parañaque.
Except where otherwise directed by the Mayor of Greater Manila or other competent authority, the laws applicable to the present city of Manila shall govern in the territory comprised in Greater Manila.
The present mayors of Manila, Quezon City and of the municipalities hereby incorporated shall be assistant Mayors of Greater Manila, but their jurisdiction shall be limited within their respective existing city or municipal boundaries.
Done in the Philippines, this first day of January, in the year of Our Lord, nineteen hundred and forty-two, and of the Commonwealth of the Philippines, the seventh.
MANUEL L. QUEZON
President of the Philippines
JORGE B. VARGAS
Secretary to the President
# Executive Order No. 51 (1907)

* EXECUTIVE ORDER,
* No. 51
In view of the representation of the Honorable Alberto Barretto, Delegate to the Philippine Assembly from the Province of Zambales, to the effect that, owing to the great distance and impassable condition of certain rivers, it is impossible for many months of each year for the inhabitants of the present barrio of Cabangan, municipality of Botolan, to go to the seat of the municipal government, and pursuant to the provisions of Act Numbered Seventeen hundred and forty-eight, entitled “An Act authorizing the adjustment of provincial and municipal boundaries and authorizing the change of capitals of provinces and subprovinces, as may be necessary from time to time to serve the public convenience and interest,” the eight municipalities of the Province of Zambales as established by Acts Numbered Nine hundred and forty-five and One thousand and four, as amended, are hereby increased to nine by separating the former municipality of Cabangan from the present municipality of Botolan. The municipality of Botolan shall consist of the territory which is comprised prior to the passage of Act Numbered Nine hundred and forty-five, and the municipality of Cabangan is hereby reconstituted and shall consist of the territory which it comprised prior the passage of said Act. The separation herein made shall be effective on January first, nineteen hundred and eight.
# Executive Order No. 52 (1907)

* EXECUTIVE ORDER,
* No. 52
After conference with the Secretary of Public Instruction and the Secretary of Commerce and Police, John S. Leech, Director of Printing; William T. Nolting, Assistant Director of Posts; and Howard A. Lampman, Insular Disbursing Officer, are hereby appointed a committee for the purpose of investigating the system at present in the operation of Quinta Market, the system formerly proposed by John S. Hord, Collector of Internal Revenue, for the conduct of said market, and the system now prposed by the Municipal Board for the administration thereof. The committee will make its recommendation to the Governor-General and submit its report as to the responsibility for any extra cost in the administration of said market since July first, nineteen hundred and seven, at as early a date practicable.
# Folk-Lore/Volume 30/Ki-Swahili Folk-Lore

Ki-Swahili Folk-Lore.
Aids to the study of Ki-swahili. Four Studies, compiled and annotated by M. W. H. Weech. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co., London, n.d.
The interest of this book is mainly philological; but it contains some matter of folk-lore interest: the tale of the Banawasi, the man who has always an answer ready and excels in repartee: and “Don’t cast your pearls before swine.” These are followed by a collection of Enigmas and Aphorisms with explanations as given by the Wa-swahili, and a Study on Magic in Pemba. This last includes papers on the Spirit Dance (by a sceptic); the Witches’ Sabbath; Four Charms whereby to cause evil to an enemy; a charm to obtain a wish from a rich man, a ​king, or a woman; and charms to cause the separation of husband and wife. Throughout the book the original Kiswahili text is printed on one side of the page, with an English translation opposite, and the full commentary gives numerous examples of folk-beliefs.
# Folk-Lore/Volume 30/Notes on Welsh Folklore

Notes on Welsh Folklore.
Omens.—If a woman making tea forgets to replace the cover of the teapot, it means that a stranger will visit the house. It is held very unlucky for a cow to bear twin calves; a farmer’s wife in Cardiganshire told me that she was trying to get rid of one of her cows which had twin calves.
When you see the first lamb of the season, if its head be towards you, the coming year will be lucky to you. If the first ​lamb of the season is male the farmer will have good luck: bad luck if it is a female.
Swans.—The eggs of the swan are hatched by thunder and lightning.
Pigeons.—If a rich man asks for a pigeon-pie or a pigeon in any other form, it is a sign that his death is near.
Fairies.—Fairies are the souls of good Druids who died before the introduction of Christianity. They are not good enough for heaven, and not bad enough for hell.
A Wishing Cell.—At St. Govain in Pembrokeshire there is a “wishing cell” in the rock. It is said that any one who turns round inside wishing for the same thing all the time, will get it before the end of the year. The place is still visited by young people who are in love.
To cure the bite of a mad dog.—An old man who was brought up on the mountains of Cardiganshire informed me that when a dog was bitten by a mad dog it was customary to write on a piece of paper the following charm: arare, char are, phragnare, phragnare, cnare, arare, arare, cnarare, phragnare. This was put in a piece of bread and given to the dog to eat. This charm is said to have been received from the celebrated wizard, Dr. Harries of Cwrtycadno in Carmarthenshire, well known in Wales and on the English borders.
Jonathan Ceredig Davies.
Llanilar, Cardiganshire.
# Folk-Lore/Volume 30/Czech Folk-Tales

SHORT NOTICES.
Czech Folk-Tales.
Czech Folk-Tales, selected and translated by Dr. Josef Baudis. London, George Allen & Unwin. 1917.
In this little volume Dr. Baudis provides an interesting collection of Czech tales, from sources unfamiliar to English readers. He remarks that “it is often supposed that Protestantism is very unfavourable to the development and preservation of folk-tales; but those of Bohemia are certainly an exception to the rule. The Czech nation was the first to adopt the Protestant faith, and even to-day is still Protestant at heart, though the Hapsburgs forced it back into the Catholic fold.” The leading characteristics of the stories are their strong ethical tendency and the natural tendency to satire which appears among the Czechs.
# Folk-Lore/Volume 30/Review/Folk-Lore from India

Folk-Lore from India.
It would have been well if the author had confined himself to the materials collected in India. His account of water cults throughout the world is based on the writings of Sir E. B. Tylor, Sir L. Gomme, and other works familiar to students, and his comments add little to our knowledge.
Another fault in this book, unfortunately too common in the case of Indian writers, is his absence of precise references. The references which he gives are not complete and will be of little use to students, and no index is provided. But, with these limitations the book possesses some value, and if the author, in a revised edition, would pursue his enquiries in India and provide a larger collection of local facts, he would do good service in the investigation of an interesting branch of folklore.
W. Crooke.
# Felte v. Southern Pacific Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
359 U.S. 326
Felte v. Southern Pacific Company
Argued: March 24, 1959. --- Decided: April 27, 1959
Mr. Harry E. Wilmarth, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for petitioner.
Mr. Clifton Hildebrand, Oakland, Cal., for respondents.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Felt Tarrant Manufacturing Company v. Gallagher

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
306 U.S. 62
Felt Tarrant Manufacturing Company v. Gallagher
Argued: Dec. 13, 1938. --- Decided: Jan 30, 1939
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California.
Messrs. A. Calder MacKay and Thomas R. Dempsey, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Mr. James J. Arditto, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from page 63 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Felony and Piracy Act 1772

Source: The Statutes, Second Revised Edition: Volume 2. London. The Stationery Office. 1889.
AN ACT for the more effectual proceeding against Persons standing mute on their Arraignment for Felony or Piracy.
FOR the more effectual proceeding against persons standing mute on their arraignment for felony or piracy, be it enacted by the King's most excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the lords spiritual and temporal, and commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, that if any person from and after the passing of this Act, being arraigned on any indictment or appeal for felony, or on any indictment for piracy, shall, upon such arraignment, stand mute, or will not answer directly to the felony or piracy, such person so standing mute as aforesaid shall be convicted of the felony or piracy charged in such indictment or appeal; and the court before whom he shall be so arraigned shall therefore award judgement and execution against such person, in the same manner as if such person had been convicted by verdict or confession of the felony or piracy charged in such indictment or appeal; and such judgement shall have all the same consequences in every respect as if such person had been convicted by verdict or confession of such felony or piracy and judgement had been thereupon awarded.
AND... the provision of this Act shall extend to his Majesty's colonies and plantations in America.
This work is in the public domain worldwide because it was created by a public body of the United Kingdom with Crown Status and commercially published before 1974.
See Crown copyright artistic works, Crown copyright non-artistic works and List of Public Bodies with Crown Status.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fellows v. Blacksmith

United States Supreme Court
60 U.S. 366
Fellows v. Blacksmith
THIS case was brought up from the Supreme Court of the State of New York, by a writ of error issued under the 25th section of the judiciary act.
The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
It was argued by Mr. Gillet and Mr. Brown for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. Martindale for the defendants.
Mr. Justice NELSON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Furness Withy Company v. Yang-Tsze Insurance Association

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
242 U.S. 430
Furness Withy Company v. Yang-Tsze Insurance Association
Argued: December 18 and 19, 1916. --- Decided: January 8, 1917
Messrs. Norman B. Beecher, Charles C. Burlingham, and Roscoe H. Hupper for petitioner.
Messrs. D. Roger Englar, J. Parker Kirlin, Lawrence Kneeland, William H. McGrann, and John M. Woolsey for respondents.
Mr. Justice McReynolds delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Furrer v. Ferris

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
145 U.S. 132
Furrer v. Ferris
O. S. Brumback, for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 133-134 intentionally omitted]
A. W. Scott, for appellee.
Mr. Justice BREWER, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Furman v. Georgia/Opinion of the Court

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Douglas Brennan Stewart White Marshall
* Dissenting Opinions Burger Blackmun Powell Rehnquist
[p239] PER CURIAM.
Petitioner in No. 69-5003 was convicted of murder in Georgia, and was sentenced to death pursuant to Ga. Code Ann. § 26-1005 (Supp. 1971) (effective prior to July 1, 1969). 225 Ga. 253, 167 S.E. 2d 628 (1969). Petitioner in No. 69-5030 was convicted of rape in Georgia, and was sentenced to death pursuant to Ga. Code Ann. § 26-1302 (Supp. 1971) (effective prior to July 1, 1969). 225 Ga. 790, 171 S.E. 2d 501 (1969). Petitioner in No. 69-5031 was convicted of rape in Texas, and was sentenced to death pursuant to Tex. Penal Code, Art. 1189 (1961). 447 S.W. 2d 932 (Ct. Crim. App. 1969). Certiorari was granted limited to the following question: Does the imposition and carrying out of the death penalty in [these cases] constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments? 403 U.S. 952. The Court holds that the imposition [p240] and carrying out of the death penalty in these cases constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. The judgment in each case is therefore reversed insofar as it leaves undisturbed the death sentence imposed, and the cases are remanded for further proceedings.
So ordered.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, MR. JUSTICE STEWART, MR. JUSTICE WHITE, and MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL have filed separate opinions in support of the judgments. THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN, MR. JUSTICE POWELL, and MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST have filed separate dissenting opinions.
# Furman v. Nichol

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
75 U.S. 44
Furman v. Nichol

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First National Bank of Logan, Utah v. Walker Bank and Trust Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
385 U.S. 252
First National Bank of Logan, Utah v. Walker Bank and Trust Company
Argued: Nov. 7 and 8, 1966. --- Decided: Dec 12, 1966
See 385 U.S. 1032, 87 S.Ct. 738.
Richard A. Posner, Washington, D.C., and Theodore S. Perry, Logan, Utah, for petitioners.
John Wilson, Washington, D.C., for First Security Bank.
James F. Bell, Washington, D.C., and Joseph S. Jones, Salt Lake City, Utah, for respondents.
Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First National Bank of Omaha v. Redick/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
110 U.S. 224
First National Bank of Omaha v. Redick
This motion is granted on the authority of Thompson v. Butler, 95 U.S. 694, and Alabama Gold Life Ins. Co. v. Nichols, ante, 120. Dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First National Bank of Princeton Illinois v. Charles E Littlefield

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
226 U.S. 110
First National Bank of Princeton Illinois v. Charles E Littlefield
Argued: November 4, 1912. --- Decided: December 2, 1912
Mr. Thorndike Saunders for appellants.
Mr. Daniel P. Hays for appellee.
Memorandum opinion, by direction of the court, by Mr. Chief Justice White:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First National Bank of Omaha v. Redick

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
110 U.S. 224
First National Bank of Omaha v. Redick
J. M. Woolworth, for plaintiff in error.
John I. Redick, for defendant in error.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First National Bank of Louisville v. City of Louisville/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
174 U.S. 438
First National Bank of Louisville v. City of Louisville
In these two cases the appellant filed its bills to enjoin the assessment and collection of certain taxes. The grounds upon which the prayer for relief in each case was rested were substantially as follows:
First, that the taxes in question were levied upon the franchise and property of the bank, and not upon the shares of stock in the names of the shareholders, and were therefore illegal; second, that the taxes were discriminatory, because, as a consequence of the exemption of certain state banks from taxation by special contract, the property of the bank was taxed at a higher rate than other moneyed capital, in violation of the act of congress; and, third, that the taxes were illegal, because not in conformity to the state constitution and certain provisions of the state laws.
The court below decided that, although the taxes were imposed or c ntemplated to be assessed on the franchise or intangible property of the bank, nevertheless they were the equivalent of a tax on the shares of stock, in the names of the shareholders, and hence did not violate the act of congress. It moreover held that the remaining grounds were without merit. 88 Fed. 409.
The law under which the taxes in question were levied is the same one which was considered in Owensboro Nat. Bank v. City of Owensboro, 173 U.S. 664, 19 Sup. Ct. 537. The theory of equivalency upon which the court below decreed the taxes to legal was in that case fully examined, and held to be unsound.
It follows that the decrees below rendered in these cases were erroneous. It is therefore ordered that said decrees be reversed, and the cases be remanded to the lower court, with directions for such further proceedings as may be in conformity with this opinion. And it is so ordered.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First National Bank of Louisville v. City of Louisville

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
174 U.S. 438
First National Bank of Louisville v. City of Louisville
James P.Helm and Helm Bruce, for First Nat. Bank.
H. L. Stone, for city of Louisville.
W. S. Taylor, for Stone, auditor, and others.
Mr. Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse