OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume I/Constantine/The Life of Constantine/Book I/Chapter 45

Chapter XLV.—His Forbearance with Unreasonable Men.
Moreover he endured with patience some who were exasperated against himself, directing them in mild and gentle terms to control themselves, and not be turbulent. And some of these respected his admonitions, and desisted; but as to those who proved incapable of sound judgment, he left them entirely at the disposal of God, and never himself desired harsh measures against any one. Hence it naturally happened that the disaffected in Africa reached such a pitch of violence as even to venture on overt acts of audacity; some evil spirit, as it seems probable, being jealous of the present great prosperity, and impelling these men to atrocious deeds, that he might excite the emperor’s anger against them. He gained nothing, however, by this malicious conduct; for the emperor laughed at these proceedings, and declared their origin to be from the evil one; inasmuch as these were not the actions of sober persons, but of lunatics or demoniacs; who should be pitied rather than punished; since to punish madmen is as great folly as to sympathize with their condition is supreme philanthropy.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Compare Prolegomena, under Life and Works.
* ↑ [This passage in the text is defective or corrupt.—Bag.] What is given is substantially the conventional translation ofValesius, Heinichen, Molzberger, and with some variation, 1709 and Bag. It is founded, however, on a conjectural reading, and reluctating against this, a suggestion may be hazarded—“an excessive philanthropy for the folly of the insane, even to the point of sympathy for them.”
# Norfolk Monument Company v. Woodlawn Memorial Gardens, Inc.

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, news, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
394 U.S. 700
Norfolk Monument Company v. Woodlawn Memorial Gardens, Inc.
Howard I. Legum and Louis B. Fine, for petitioner.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Norfolk Railway Company v. United States

United States Supreme Court
287 U.S. 134
Norfolk Railway Company v. United States
Argued: Oct. 19, 1932. --- Decided: Nov 7, 1932
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Virginia.
Messrs. D. Lynch Younger, of Washington, D.C., F. Markoe Rivinus, of Roanoke, Va., Theodore W. Reath, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Harvey B. Apperson, of Roanoke, Va., for appellant.
The Attorney General and Mr. John Lord O'Brian, Asst. to Atty. Gen., for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 134-136 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Norfolk Railway Company v. North Carolina ex rel. Maxwell

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
297 U.S. 682
Norfolk Railway Company v. North Carolina ex rel. Maxwell
Argued: March 6, 1936. --- Decided: March 30, 1936
Appeal from the Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mr. F. M. Rivinus, of Roanoke, Va., for appellant.
Mr. A. A. F. Seawell, of Raleigh, N.C., for appellee.
Mr. Justice CARDOZO delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Norfolk Railway Company v. Public Service Commission of West Virginia

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 70
Norfolk Railway Company v. Public Service Commission of West Virginia
Argued: Jan. 21, 1924. --- Decided: May 5, 1924
Messrs. John H. Holt, of Huntington, W. Va., Theodore W. Reath, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Lucian H. Cocke, of Roanoke, Va., for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Randolph Bias, of Williamson, W. Va., and F. M. Livezey, of Huntington, W. Va., for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Norfolk Company v. Pendleton

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
156 U.S. 667
Norfolk Company v. Pendleton
W. H. Bolling and Wm. J. Robertson, for plaintiff in error.
John J. A. Powell, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice SHIRAS delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# On Time (Swift)

Ever eating, never cloying, All-devouring, all-destroying Never finding full repast, Till I eat the world at last.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# On Violet’s Wafers, Sent Me When I Was Ill

Sidney Lanier composed this poem in Baltimore, Maryland in early 1881, just a few weeks before he passed away. His class in English Literature, composed of young girls, had been studying Chaucer’s The Knighte’s Tale when he was stricken with illness. This sonnet was composed for a member of that class. His sonnet “To My Class: On Certain Fruits and Flowers Sent Me in Sickness” was similarly conceived for the entire class.
Fine-tissued as her finger-tips, and white  As all her thoughts; in shape like shields of prize,  As if before young Violet’s dreaming eyes Still blazed the two great Theban bucklers bright That swayed the random of that furious fight  Where Palamon and Arcite made assize  For Emily; fresh, crisp as her replies, That, not with sting, but pith, do oft invite  More trial of the tongue; simple, like her, Well fitting lowlihood, yet fine as well,  —The queen’s no finer; rich (though gossamer) In help to him they came to, which may tell  How rich that him she’ll come to; thus men see,  Like Violet’s self e’en Violet’s wafers be.
# On Time (Milton)

* "On Time", in Poems of Mr. John Milton, Both English and Latin, Compos'd at several times (1645)
* "On Time", in Poems &c. Upon Several Occasions (1673)
# On Tobacco

This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
    Although of ordinary use in physic, the anatomy of tobacco is not yet discovered, nor hath Hoffmanus in his work of thirty years relieved us. That which comes fermented and dyed unto us affords no distinct account, in regard it is infected with a decoction or lixivium, which is diverse according to different places, and some ascend no higher than urine. Adulterations proceed further, adding euphorbium or pepper, and some do innocently temper it with gum of guaiacum.
    The herb simply in itself and green and dried, is but flat, nor will it hold fire well upon ordinary exsiccation. Other plants are taken in the pipe, but they want quickness and hold not fire, only prick and draw........by their fulgio, which all smoke will do;and probably other herbs might be made quick and fire well, if prepared the same way, that is by fermentation, for in that alteration the body is opened, the fixed parts attenuated by the spirit, the oily parts diffused and the salt raised from the earthly bed wherein it naturally lieth obscure and heavy.
    It containeth three eminent qualities, sudorific, narcotic, and purgative; from the subtle spirits and flying salt, sweat seems to proceed, for the ashes will not do it. The narcotic depends upon the humor impurus; for the vapopur thereof contains it, and the burnt part loseth it, as in opium. Poppy seeds dried are ineffectual, and the green heads work most powerfully; the same is observable in the mandichoca root, which being a strong poison, is harmless being dried. The purgative quality lieth in the middle principle, which goes not away from a gentle heat; for the water purgeth not, the smoke but very doubtfully, and seldom in clysters of the smoke of three or four pipefuls, nor in the salt thereof, neither incineration, but in the middle principles of the nitrous salt, and such parts as are to be extracted by tincture,infusion, or decoction, whose actives remain in the menstruum, and therefore that which is decocted, and after dried, grows faint in the purgative quality, if it returneth.
    Of tobacco there is the male and female; the male the best. Yellow rhubarb is often taken for the true plant.
    Tobacco may be made or cured without a caldo, and will ferment and grow brown long laid together, and hung up will grow brown. To advance the same the caldo may be added before the rolling up, for then it will have a quicker taste and sweeter smell.
    The leaves first ripe make the best when they grow gummy and brittle; they must be often cleared of the sprouts that grow upon the same stem and the baschros left out.
    To make the best tobacco, these to be taken, and of the male; and a good caldo used, and kept awhile, till time digest remaining crudities.
       Source The Works of Sir Thomas Browne 3 Vols. Henry Bohn. London 1852
# On Time

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "On Time."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.

## Essays

* "On Time" (1916), an essay by Thomas Arkle Clark

## Poems

* "On Time", ("Fly envious Time, till thou run out thy race"), a poem by John Milton
* "On Time" ("Ever eating, never cloying"), a poem by Jonathan Swift

## Other

* On Times (De temporibus), by the Venerable Bede

## See also

* Time
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume III/Theodoret/Letters/Letter 173

CLXXIII. Letter to Andreas, Monk of Constantinople.
“God is faithful who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape that ye may be able to bear it,” and convicts falsehood,—although now refuted assertion of the falsehood is approved,—and the power of truth has been shewn. For, lo, they, who by their impious reasoning had confused the natures of our Saviour Christ, and dared to preach one nature, and therefore insulted the most holy and venerable Nestorius, high priest of God, their mouths held, as the prophet says, with bit and bridle and turned from wrong to right, have once again learnt the truth, adopting the statement of him who in the cause of truth has borne the brunt of the battle. For instead of one nature they now confess two, anathematizing all who preach mixture and confusion. They adore the impassible Godhead of Christ; they attribute passion to the flesh; they distinguish between the terms of the Gospels, ascribing the lofty and divine to the Godhead, and the lowly to the manhood. Such are the writings now brought from Egypt.

## Footnotes

* ↑ cf. Epp. CXLIII and CLXXVII.
* ↑ 1 Cor. x. 13
* ↑ Ps. xxxi. 9
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume III/Theodoret/Letters/Letter 176

CLXXVI. Letter to the same Alexander after he had learnt that John, Bishop of Antioch, had Anathematized the Doctrine of Nestorius.
Be it known to your holiness that when I read the letter addressed to the emperor I was much distressed, because I know perfectly well that the writer of the letter, being of the same opinions, has unwisely and impiously condemned one who has never held or taught anything contrary to sound doctrine. But the form of anathema, though it be more likely than his assent to the condemnation, to grieve a reader, nevertheless has given me some ground of comfort, in that it is laid down not in wide general terms, but with some qualification. For he has not said “We anathematize his doctrine” but “whatever he has either said or held other than is warranted by the doctrine of the apostles.”

## Footnotes

* ↑ This letter was also edited by Garnerius as addressed to Himerius but is inscribed by Schulze to Alexander of Hierapolis. It is to be found complete in Mans. 927.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume III/Theodoret/Letters/Letter 175

CLXXV. To Alexander of Hierapolis.
I have already informed your holiness that if the doctrine of the very holy and venerable bishop, my lord Nestorius, is condemned, I will not communicate with those who do so. If it shall please your holiness to insert this in the letter which is being sent to Antioch so be it. Let there then, I beseech you, be no delay!

## Footnotes

* ↑ This according to Marius Mercator is the conclusion of a letter to Alexander of Hierapolis. Garnerius had edited it as the conclusion of the preceding letter to Himerius. Vide Mans. v. 880.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume III/Theodoret/Letters/Letter 178

CLXXVIII. Letter to Alexander of Hierapolis.
I think that more than all the very holy and venerable bishop, my lord John, must have been gratified at my refusing either to give my consent to the condemnation of the very holy and venerable bishop Nestorius or to violate the pledges made at Tarsus, Chalcedon and Ephesus.
He remembers also what was frequently received from us at Antioch after our departure.
Let no one therefore deceive your holiness into the belief that I should ever do this, for God is without doubt on my side and strengthening me.

## Footnotes

* ↑ The complete letter is given in another Latin version Baluz. Synod. LXVI. Garnerius makes it the conclusion of the letter to Andrew of Samosata.
* ↑ The order of events is reversed. John and his friends went from Ephesus to Chalcedon, from Chalcedon via Ancyra to Tarsus, where he was in his own patriarchate, and held a council, confirming Cyril’s deposition, and pledging its members never to abandon Nestorius. Again at Antioch the same course was repeated.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume III/Theodoret/Letters/Letter 179

CLXXIX. Letter of Cyril to John, Bishop of Antioch, against Theodoret.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Vide Migne LXXVII. 327. Cyril. Ep. lxiii.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume III/Theodoret/Letters/Letter 177

CLXXVII. Letter to Andreas, Bishop of Samosata.
The illustrious Aristolaus has sent Magisterianus from Egypt with a letter of Cyril in which he anathematizes Arius, Eunomius, Apollinarius and all who assert Christ’s Godhead to be passible and maintain the confusion and commixture of the two natures. Hereat we rejoice, although he did withhold his consent from our statement. He requires further subscription to the condemnation which has been passed, and that the doctrine of the holy bishop Nestorius be anathematized. Your holiness well knows that if any one anathematizes, without distinction, the doctrine of that most holy and venerable bishop, it is just the same as though he seemed to anathematize true religion.
We must then if we are compelled anathematize those who call Christ mere man, or who divide our one Lord Jesus Christ into two sons and deny His divinity, etc.

## Footnotes

* ↑ This letter is to be found complete in Latin in Mans. Synod. 840, Schulze’s Index inscribing it to Andreas the Constantinopolitan monk. cf. Ep. CLXII. and note.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume III/Theodoret/Letters/Letter 19

XIX. To the Presbyter Basilius.
I have found the right eloquent orator Athanasius to be just what your letter described him. His tongue is adorned by his speech, and his speech by his character, and all about him is brightened by his abundant faith. Ever, most God-beloved friend, send us such gifts. You have given me, be assured, very great pleasure through my intercourse with him.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume III/Theodoret/Letters/Letter 174

CLXXIV. To Himerius, Bishop of Nicomedia.
We wish to acquaint your holiness that on reading and frequently discussing the letter brought from Egypt we find it in harmony with the doctrine of the Church. Of the twelve Chapters we have proved the contrary, and up to the present time we continue to oppose them. We have therefore determined, if your holiness has recovered the churches divinely entrusted to you, that you ought to communicate with the Egyptians and Constantinopolitans and others who have fought with them against us, because they have professed to hold our faith, or I should rather say the faith of the apostles; but not to give your consent to the alleged condemnation of the very holy and venerable Nestorius. For we hold it impious and unjust in the case of charges in which both appeared as defendants to lavish favour on the one and shut the door of repentance on the other. Far more unjust and impious is it to condemn an innocent man to death. Your holiness should be assured that you ought not to communicate with them before you have recovered your churches. For this not only I but all the holy bishops of our district decreed in the recent Council.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Himerius was of the “Conciliabulum,” and a staunch Nestorian. LeQuien points out that he, as well as Theodoret, became ultimately reconciled to the victorious party.
# On the Hill-top/Foreword

The little books of the "Marjorie and the Dream" series are not written primarily for children in years; but are for the little girl or boy within, who never has grown up, and never will grow up. Those who would find the kernel of these bits of allegory, have but to know that Marjorie is this ever-young child within; and the Dream is the prosecuting attorney, self-analysis, who asks us questions—questions which we all must answer either now or sometime in the years to come.
K. M. Y.
Honolulu, 1919.
To one who dwells on the hill-top
# On the Hill-Side

English-language translations of U strže include:
* "On the Hill-Side" in Anthology of Modern Slavonic Literature in Prose and Verse (1919).
* "On the hill-side" in Modern Czech Poetry (1920).
# Pain—has an Element of Blank—

* "The Mystery of Pain" in Poems (1890)
* "Pain has an element of blank" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# Pakington

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Pakington."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Pakington, Dorothy
* Pakington, John (d.1560)
* Pakington, John (1549-1625)
* Pakington, John (1620-1680)
* Pakington, John (1671-1727)
* Pakington, John Somerset
* Pakington, William
# Pal o' Mine

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Pal o' Mine."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Pal o' Mine" (1868), a song by Henry Brougham Farnie
* Pal o' Mine (1924), a silent film directed by Edward Le Saint
* Palo'mine (1925), also known as Pal o' Mine and Pal O'Mine, a novel by Clarence Hawkes
# Pakootas v. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd.

* related portals: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
* 452 F.3d 1066
* Joseph A. PAKOOTAS, an individual and enrolled member of the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation; Donald R. Michel, an individual and enrolled member of the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation; State of Washington, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
* v.
* TECK COMINCO METALS, LTD., a Canadian corporation, Defendant-Appellant.
* No. 05-35153
* United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
* Argued and Submitted December 5, 2005
* Filed July 3, 2006
Kevin M. Fong, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellant Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd.
Paul J. Dayton and Daniel F. Johnson, Short Cressman & Burgess PLLC, Seattle, Washington, for plaintiffs-appellees Joseph A. Pakootas and Donald R. Michel.
Alexandra K. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Olympia, Washington, for plaintiff/intervenor-appellee State of Washington.
Loren R. Dunn, Riddell Williams PS, Seattle, Washington, for amici Washington Environmental Council, Washington, Public Interest Research Group, and Citizens for a Clean Columbia.
Rex S. Heinke, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Los Angeles, California, for amici Canadian Chamber of Commerce and the Mining Association of Canada.
Brian Hembacher, Deputy Attorney General, Los Angeles, California, for amici People of the State of California ex rel. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General for the State of California, and the States of Arizona, Idaho, Montana and Oregon.
Margaret K. Pfeiffer, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Washington, D.C., for amicus Government of Canada.
Carter G. Phillips, Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP, Washington, D.C., for amicus Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America.
Rob Roy Smith, Morisset Schlosser Jozwiak & McGaw, Seattle, Washington, for amicus Okanagan National Alliance in support of plaintiffs-appellees.
Catherine E. Stetson, Hogan & Hartson LLP, Washington, D.C., for amici National Mining Association and the National Association of Manufacturers.
Martin Wagner, Earthjustice, Oakland, California, for amici Sierra Club and Sierra Club of Canada.
Shannon D. Work, Funke & Work, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, for amicus Spokane Tribe of Indians.
Before: Ronald M. Gould and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges, and William W Schwarzer, District Judge. Opinion by Judge Gould.

## Footnotes

* ↑ The Honorable William W Schwarzer, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pale Pink Porcelain

Originally published in Mystery Magazine, 1927.
* "Pale Pink Porcelain," in The Wind That Tramps the World (1929)
* "Pale Pink Porcelain" in Weird Tales, 24 (6) (December 1934)
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1968, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 55 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pacific Law Reporter

The Pacific Law Reporter is a periodical, published from 1870 to 1878.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pacific Law Magazine

The Pacific Law Magazine is a periodical, published in 1867.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse