OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Sofre Alexander v. Seferino Crollott

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
199 U.S. 580
Sofre Alexander v. Seferino Crollott
Argued: November 27, 1905. --- Decided: December 18, 1905
Mr. Neill B. Field for appellant.
Mr. William B. Childers for appellee.
Statement by Mr. Justice Brown:
This is an appeal from a judgment of the supreme court quashing a writ of prohibition issued by that court to the defendant Crollott, a justice of the peace of the county of Bernalillo, which commanded him to desist and refrain from any further proceedings in five several actions of forcible entry and detainer, instituted by one Cleland before said justice and against Alexander and four other parties.
An appeal was taken from the order quashing the writ to this court.
Mr. Justice Brown delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Soft Snow

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
From Notebook, p. 107, reversed. See also Songs and Ballads.

#### 1st reading:

Soft Snow
I walked abroad in a snowy day: I ask'd the soft snow with me to play: She play'd & she melted in all her prime, [Ah, that sweet love should be thought a crime! del.] And the winter call'd it a dreadful crime.
________

#### 2nd reading:

Soft Snow
I walked abroad in a snowy day
I askd the soft snow with me to play
She playd & she melted in all her prime
And the winter calld it a dreadful crime
________

## Wikisource notes

* ↑ "Blake Complete Writings", ed. Geoffrey Keynes, pub. OUP 1966/85, p. 176.
* ↑ "The Complete Poetry & Prose of William Blake", ed. by David V. Erdman, Anchor Books, 1988, p. 473
* ↑ Soft Snow Lined through vertically, but not extant elsewhere. 4 And … crime] Ah that sweet love should be thought a crime 1st rdg del
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Soft deceit & Idleness

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
From Notebook, p. 103, reversed. See also Songs and Ballads

#### 1st reading:

[Which are beauties sweetest dress? del.] Soft deceit & idleness,
These are beauties sweetest dress.
________________________________________

#### 2nd reading:

Soft deceit & Idleness
These are Beautys sweetest dress
________________________________________
* ↑ "Blake Complete Writings", ed. Geoffrey Keynes, pub. OUP 1966/85, p. 182.
* ↑ "The Complete Poetry & Prose of William Blake", ed. by David V. Erdman, Anchor Books, 1988, p. 474.
* ↑ Soft deceit & Idleness These are Beautys sweetest dress] Line added, on p 103, after cancellation of an introductory question: “Which are beauties sweetest dress”. The poem began as question and answer, was changed to pure answer.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Soeur Monique

* Meynell, Alice (1875), "Soeur Monique" in Preludes.
* Meynell, Alice (1921), "Sœur Monique" in Poems.
# Sofre Alexander v. Seferino Crollott/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
199 U.S. 580
Sofre Alexander v. Seferino Crollott
Argued: November 27, 1905. --- Decided: December 18, 1905
Although a writ of prohibition will lie to an inferior court where it is acting manifestly beyond its jurisdiction, such writ will issue only when there is no other remedy. Smith v. Whitney, 116 U.S. 167, 29 L. ed 601, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 570; Re Cooper, 143 U.S. 472, 495, 36 L. ed. 232, 239, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 453; Re Rice, 155 U.S. 403, 39 L. ed. 201, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 149; Re New York S. S.C.o. 155 U.S. 531, 39 L. ed. 249, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 183.
By his answer Alexander claimed to be the owner of the property, and alleged a want of jurisdiction on the part of the justice to determine the question of ownership in a proceeding for forcible entry and detainer. The justice decided against him. Under such circumstances he should have taken an appeal to the district court under § 3358 of the New Mexican Code, which provides that 'an appeal shall be allowed to the district court in all cases wherein judgment may be hereafter rendered in forcible entry and unlawful detainer, or both.' No reason is apparent why this appeal was not taken.
The fact that the judgment may have been void will not prevent its reversal upon appeal (Capron v. Van Noorden, 2 Cranch, 126, 2 L. ed. 229; Kempe v. Kennedy, 5 Cranch, 173, 3 L. ed. 70; Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 393, 473, 518, 566, 15 L. ed. 691, 728, 747, 767; Mansfield, C. & L. M. R. Co. v. Swan, 111 U.S. 379, 382, 28 L. ed. 462, 463, 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 510; Mexican Nat. R. Co. v. Davidson, 157 U.S. 208, 39 L. ed. 675, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 563; Jordan v. Dennis, 7 Met. 590; Waters v. Randall, 8 Met. 132; Striker v. Mott, 6 Wend. 465; Langford v. Monteith, 102 U.S. 145, 26 L. ed. 53), nor does the requirement of a bond obviate the necessity of an appeal. It is one of the ordinary incidents of litigation.
Affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Softly Now the Light of Day

* "Softly now the Light of Day" in The Riverside song book, 1893
* "Softly Now the Light of Day" in The Army and Navy Hymnal, 1920.
# Softly and Tenderly

Softly and Tenderly is an old american folk songs with christian lyrics. It was composed by Will L. Thompson and first published in 1880. The song was recorded by many different artitst like Bill Anderson, Eddy Arnold, Pat Boone, Johnny Cash or Roy Drusky. A famous version was made on December 4, 1956, when the Million Dollar Quartet (Elvis Presley, Carl Perkins, Jerry Lee Lewis, Johnny Cash) played it during his informal jam session, the "Sun Session".

## Lyrics

The following are the original lyrics, written by Will L. Thompson.
Softly and tenderly Jesus is calling, Calling for you and for me; See, on the portals He’s waiting and watching, Watching for you and for me.
Refrain: Come home, come home, You who are weary, come home; Earnestly, tenderly, Jesus is calling, Calling, O sinner, come home!
Why should we tarry when Jesus is pleading, Pleading for you and for me? Why should we linger and heed not His mercies, Mercies for you and for me?
Time is now fleeting, the moments are passing, Passing from you and from me; Shadows are gathering, deathbeds are coming, Coming for you and for me.
Oh, for the wonderful love He has promised, Promised for you and for me! Though we have sinned, He has mercy and pardon, Pardon for you and for me.

## References

* Lyrics provided by "Timeless Truth" - the free online library
# Sawyer v. Gray

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
237 U.S. 674
Sawyer v. Gray
Argued: April 22, 1915. ---
Messrs. Francis W. Clements, Evans Browne, and Alexander Britton for appellants.
Messrs. H. H. Field and F. M. Dudley for certain appellees.
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sawin v. Kenny

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
93 U.S. 289
Sawin v. Kenny
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Kenny and Foley, the plaintiffs below, sued Sawin and the Little Rock, Pine Bluff, and New Orleans Railroad Company, upon a contract which on its face appeared to have been executed by and to bind only Sawin, of the one part, and Kenny and Foley, of the other. A copy of the contract was attached to and made part of the complaint; which alleged that, although executed in the name of Sawin, it was, in fact, the contract of the railroad company, and that Sawin, by signing it, became liable jointly with the company for the performance of its obligations. The averment was then made, that the 'railroad company, by virtue of said contract, and the said Daniel C. Sawin, by signing the same and making himself party thereto, . . . were indebted to said plaintiffs for work and labor done, and materials furnished, under said written contract, in the principal sum of $8,816.08;' for which, with interest, a judgment was asked.
The defendants answered separately; the railroad company denying the execution of the contract and all liability under it. Sawin also denied the execution of the contract by the railroad company, and claimed that he alone was bound by it. He then set out his defence to the claim as made against him, and, among other things, said, 'It is not true that the said railroad company and this defendant, or either of them, were . . . indebted to the said plaintiffs in the sum of $8,816.08, for materials furnished, or work done, by said plaintiffs; and this defendant avers, that the entire sum due from this defendant to said plaintiffs, at the time of the commencement of this suit for said materials furnished and work done under said contract, was the sum of $2,500, for which this defendant hereby offers to let judgment go against him.'
A trial was then had to a jury upon the issues joined, which resulted in a verdict in favor of the railroad company, but against Sawin, for $9,131.98. After the verdict, Sawin moved an arrest of judgment against himself; assigning for cause:--
1. That the said plaintiffs did not by their said complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; and—
2. That said plaintiffs have not by their said complaint stated or shown any right or cause of action against the defendant.
This motion was overruled, and judgment entered on the verdict. The case coming here upon writ of error, the only error assigned is the refusal of the court to arrest the judgment.
Submitted, on printed arguments, by Mr. Quinton Corwine for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. A. H. Garland for the defendant in error.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sawin v. Kenny/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
93 U.S. 289
Sawin v. Kenny
We think the court below decided correctly. By the Code of Practice of Arkansas, which was in force when this judgment was rendered, it was provided, that, 'Where two or more persons are jointly bound by contract, the action thereon may be brought against all or any of them, at the plaintiff's option' (sect. 4480, Gantt's Dig., 1874); that 'judgment may be given for or against one or more of several plaintiffs, and for or against one or more of several defendants' (sect. 4701); and that, 'though all the defendants have been summoned, judgment may be rendered against any of them severally, where the plaintiff would be entitled to judgment against such defendants if the action had been against them alone' (sect. 4704). This, under the act of June 1, 1872 (17 Stat. 187, sect. 5; Rev. Stat. 914), furnished a rule of practice for the courts of the United States in that State. Clearly, in this case, if the action had been brought against Sawin alone, judgment could have been entered against him on this verdict. He, in his answer, acknowledged his liability upon the contract, which is the foundation of the action, and offered to confess judgment for $2,500. After that, as between him and the plaintiffs, the only question was one of amount. Substantial justice has, therefore, been done between these parties; and, by the operation of these remedial provisions of the code, the sacrifice of substance to mere form and mode of proceeding has been prevented.
Judgment affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sermons on the Ten Commandments

SERMONS
ON THE
TEN COMMANDMENTS.
BY THE
REV. O. PRESCOTT HILLER, MINISTER OF THE NEW JERUSALEM CHURCH, CROSS STREET, HATTON GARDEN, LONDON.
BOSTON:
T. H. CARTER AND SONS, 25 Bromfield Street. 1868.
Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1867, by T. H. Carter & Sons,
In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of Massachusetts.
CAMBRIDGE: PRINTED BY H. O. HOUGHTON AND COMPANY.
PREFATORY NOTE.
The numbering of the Commandments will be found different, in the present volume, from that in common use in the English and American Churches. What are commonly reckoned as the first two Commandments, are here counted as one. Consequently, what is usually considered the third Commandment, is here numbered as the second,—the fourth as the third, and so on. This is the mode of division adopted in the Lutheran Church, and which has been followed by Swedenborg.
CONTENTS.
SERMON I.
Page
SERMON II.
SERMON III.
SERMON IV.
SERMON V.
SERMON VI.
SERMON VII.
SERMON VIII.
SERMON IX.
SERMON X.
SERMON XI.
SERMON XII.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Songs of the Slav/The Daughter of Sláva

SONGS OF THE SLAV
THE DAUGHTER OF SLÁVA
Jan Kollár
Canto III.Sonnet 62
A hundred times I spoke, but now I call To you divided, O Slavonians! Let's be a whole and not a part in clans; Be one in harmony or naught at all.
A dove-like nation we in scorn are styled. But doves you know are come of such a stock That loves to live within a common flock, And so may you apply this trait reviled.
O Slavs, thou race of many fragments! United forces e'er results will show, But waste and dry the circling currents.
O Slavs, who are of many heads a race! The wise indeed a death no worse can know Than life that sloth, void, darkness doth embrace.
Canto III.Sonnet 110
What will become of Slavs in hundred years? What will the whole of Europe come to be? Slav life, just as a mighty flow appears, Shall everywhere extend its boundary.
That tongue, which German henchmen falsely low Proclaimed a tongue of slaves to all around, Shall 'neath our rival's palace ceilings sound And even spoken be by lips of foe.
Sciences shall likewise Slav channels see; Our people's customs, dress and music will On both the Seine and Danube modish be.
O would that I had rather been born when The Slavs shall rulers be! Or better still, I shall then rise up from my grave again.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Songs of the Slave

Collection of Czech poems, originally published in 1895.
English-language translations of Písně otroka include:
Translations of poems that originally appeared in this work include:
* Songs of the Slave by Otto Kotouč in Poet Lore, vol. 27, no. 1 (1916); contains only poems no. I and III.
* Songs of the Slave in Songs of the Slav (1919), by Otto Kotouč; contains only poems no. I, II, III, XVI, XVII, XVIII and XXIII
* Songs of a slave in The Soul Of A Century (1943), by Roderick Aldrich Ginsburg; contains only poems no. V and VII, and excerpts from poems no. II, III and XXIII (not in order)
* At Dawn (Jak jitřním poupěti) in A Book of Czech Verse (1958), by Alfred French; a part of poem no. XV (only pages 52–53)
# Songs of the Slav/To My Mother

TO MY MOTHER
My mother, aft long rows of years I plant To-day a sonnet 'neath thy name of gold. Only a sonnet where hymn I should chant, But verses, where should sacred prayers be told.
Ah, one must tread adown the path of woe And bury much in many storm accursed, Curse all that once he would have fondled so, Despair, and oftentimes in weeping burst.
Then ridicule he must cynically That frivolous, yet frightful song of life, To accent the word "mother" properly.
And loathsome must that song to him remain, To say he hears forever in the strife That "mother" sound as a sacred refrain.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Songs of the Slav/You and I

YOU AND I
Out of my way now: Black are my hands and damp is my clothing. Only a miner am I, to-day noble thou; Thou'rt from a palace, a hut is my dwelling. Frigid's the cap I wear, with a visor on, Orphans' lamenting prayers do not follow me; Eaten up fields for them have hares of thine. Heartless and soulless thou'rt, lightning smite thee! I am from Bezkyd, thralldom and sorrow's son. I slave in foundery, I slave in thy mine, Gall seethes in my veins, but still I slave, I catch thy logs on the foaming river's wave. Black am I, poor am I, sweat pours from my brow, Children in Bezkyd weep not on my account now. Widows oppressed I not, nor did I seize their share, And so a beggar am I, a noble thou to-day. Did you arrive in the mountains? Then take care. Frigid's my cap. Get thee out of my way.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Songs of the Soul

Layout 2
SONGS OF THE SOUL
By SWAMI YOGANANDA, A.B. Of India
Founder of
Ranchi and Puri Brahmacharya Residential Schools in India
Sat Sanga (Fellowship with Truth), Boston
Sat Sanga Summer School, Waltham
Vice-President: SADHU SABHA, India
Delegate from India to International Congress of Religions
Boston, 1920
Author of
“Science of Religion,” etc.
PUBLISHED BY SAT SANGA
30 HUNTINGTON AVENUE, BOSTON
1923
Copyrighted, 1923, by Swami Yogananda, Boston, Mass.
Everett Printing Service, Boston
CONTENTS
Part I :
| Consecration | 7 |
| Soul Is Marching On | 8 |
| They Are Thine | 10 |
| Thou in Me | 11 |
| Thy Call | 12 |
| One That’s Everywhere | 14 |
| Whispers | 15 |
| In Me | 16 |
| Too Near | 18 |
| Evasion | 19 |
| Thy Cruel Silence | 20 |
| I Am Here | 21 |
| Where I Am | 23 |
| One Friend | 25 |
| Flower Offering | 26 |
| The Tattered Dress | 27 |
| Thy Secret Throne | 28 |
| Methought I Heard a Voice | 30 |
| A Milk-White Sail | 32 |
| The Harvest | 33 |
| The Splinters of Thy Love | 34 |
| For Thee and Thine | 35 |
| Part II ||
| Wake, Wake, My Sleeping Hunger, Wake | 39 |
| Eternity | 41 |
| Vanishing Bubbles | 42 ​ |
| Variety | 44 |
| The Blood of Rose | 47 |
| At the Roots of Eternity | 48 |
| Undying Beauty | 49 |
| The Noble New | 51 |
| Protecting Thorns | 52 |
| Tattered Garment | 53 |
| In Stillness Dark | 54 |
| Nature’s Nature | 56 |
| My Kinsmen | 61 |
| Om | 64 |
| Mystery | 66 |
| Silence | 68 |
| It’s All Unknown | 70 |
| At the Fountain of Song | 72 |
| The Ever-New | 74 |
| The Ever-Trodden Path | 76 |
| The Human Mind | 77 |
| The Cup of Eternity | 79 |
| A Mirror New | 81 |
| The Spell | 82 |
| Part III ||
| My Native Land | 85 |
| On Coming to the New-Old Land of America | 87 |
| The Toiler’s Lay | 89 |
| City Drum | 91 |
| Part IV ||
| Foreword | 95 |
| Vision of Visions | 97 |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1952, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 71 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Southern Pacific Company v. Fall

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
257 U.S. 460
Southern Pacific Company v. Fall
Argued: Oct. 21, 1921. --- Decided: Jan 3, 1922
Messrs. C. F. R. Ogilby and A. A. Hoehling, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Messrs. Solicitor General Beck, Assistant Attorney General Riter, and H. L. Underwood, all of Washington, D. C., for appellees.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Southern Pacific Company v. Gileo

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
351 U.S. 493
Southern Pacific Company v. Gileo
Argued: May 1, 1956. --- Decided: June 11, 1956
Mr.
Arthur B. Dunne, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
Mr. Clifton Hildebrand, Oakland, Cal., for respondents Gileo and Eelk.
Mr.Thomas C. Perkins, Sacramento, Cal., for respondent Eufrazia.
Mr. Nathaniel S.C.olley, Sacramento, Cal., for respondents Moreno and Aranda.
Mr. Justice MINTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Southern Pacific Company v. Gileo/Concurrence Harlan

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Harlan
United States Supreme Court
351 U.S. 493
Southern Pacific Company v. Gileo
Argued: May 1, 1956. --- Decided: June 11, 1956
Mr. Justice HARLAN concurs in the result.
Mr. Justice REED and Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER agree that the writs in Southern Pacific Co. v. Eufrazia and Southern Pacific Co. v. Eelk must be dismissed because they were improvidently granted for want of final state court judgments. Regarding Southern Pacific Co. v. Gileo, Southern Pacific Co. v. Aranda, and Southern Pacific Co. v. Moreno, they disagree with the Court's theory in applying the Act of 1939, for the reasons set forth in Mr. Justice Frankfurter's dissent in Reed v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 351 U.S. 502, 76 S.Ct. 958.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Southern Pacific Company v. Gallagher

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
306 U.S. 167
Southern Pacific Company v. Gallagher
Argued: Dec. 12, 1938. --- Decided: Jan 30, 1939
Mr. Harry H. McElroy, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 168-169 intentionally omitted]
Mr. H. H. Linney, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Southern Pacific Company v. Haglund

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
277 U.S. 304
Southern Pacific Company v. Haglund
Argued: April 13, 1928. --- Decided: May 21, 1928
Mr. William Denman, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 305-306 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Ira S. Lillick and J. F. Sullivan, both of San Francisco, Cal., for respondents.
Mr. Justice SANFORD delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Southern Pacific Company v. Denton

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
146 U.S. 202
Southern Pacific Company v. Denton
J. Hubley Ashton, for plaintiff in error.
D. A. McKnight, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice GRAY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse