OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Interstate Commerce Commission v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company

United States Supreme Court
288 U.S. 14
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company
Argued: Nov. 8, 9, 1932. --- Decided: Jan 9, 1933
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon.
Messrs. J. Stanley Payne, of Washington, D.C., and I. H. Van Winkle, of Salem, Or., for appellant Interstate Commerce Commission.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 15-20 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Wm. C. McCulloch, of Portland, Or., for appellant Public Utility Commissioner of Oregon.
Mr. James M. Thompson, of Boise, Idaho, for appellant Public Utilities Commission of Idaho.
Mr. Arthur C. Spencer, of Portland, Or., for appellee Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co.
Mr. Ben. C. Dey, of Portland, Or., for appellee Southern Pac. Co.
Messrs. James M. Souby, of Omaha, Neb., and Alfred A. Hampson, of Portland, Or., for other appellees.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Interstate Commerce Commission v. Railway Labor Executives Association

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
315 U.S. 373
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Railway Labor Executives Association
Argued: Feb. 3, 1942. --- Decided: March 2, 1942
On Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.
Messrs. Francis Biddle, Atty. Gen., and Edward M. Reidy, of Washington, D.C., for appellant Interstate Commerce Commission.
Mr. Frank Karr, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant Pac. Elec. Ry. Co.
Mr. Willard H. McEwen, of Toledo, Ohio, for appellees.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Interstate Commerce Commission v. Parker

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
326 U.S. 60
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Parker
Argued: March 28, 1945. --- Decided: June 18, 1945
See 66 S.Ct. 8.
Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Indiana.
Mr. Daniel H. Kunkel, for appellant Interstate Commerce Commission.
Mr. John Dickinson, for appellants Willett Co., of Indiana and Pennsylvania R. Co.
Mr. Kit F. Clardy, of Lansing, Mich., for appellees Harry A. Parker et al.
Mr. Fred I. King, of Indianapolis, Ind., for appellee
[Argument of Counsel from page 61 intentionally omitted] Norwalk Truck line co.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Interstate Commerce Commission v. Northern Pacific Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States, Northern Pacific Railway.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
216 U.S. 538
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Northern Pacific Railway Company
Argued: February 23 and 24, 1910. --- Decided: March 7, 1910
Assistant to the Attorney General Ellis and Messrs. P. J. Farrell and Edwin P. Grosvenor for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 539-540 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Charles W. Bunn for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 540-541 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hartranft v. Sheppard

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
125 U.S. 337
Hartranft v. Sheppard
Sol. Gen. Jenks, for plaintiff in error.
F. P. Prichard, for defendants in error.
The following opinion, prepared by Mr. Chief Justice WAITE, was delivered by the court as its opinion.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hartranft v. Winters/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
121 U.S. 616
Hartranft v. Winters
This is an action by Anton Winters, brought in a state court of Pennsylvania, and removed into the circuit court of the United States for the Eastern district of Pennsylvania, against the collector of customs for the district of Philadelphia. The proceedings in it, and the questions arising, are in all respects the same as those in the case of Hartranft v. Wiegmann, ante, 1240, (just decided;) the only difference being that in this case there were no shells called 'green snails' or 'mottoes' or 'Turk's caps' or 'magpies' or 'trocus,' and that there were shells called 'rose murex,' 'motto cowries,' 'banded snails,' 'Japan ears,' 'turbo shells,' 'red ears,' and 'pearl snails.'
The same conclusion is arrived at as in the Wiegmann Case, and the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hartsfield v. Wainwright

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 782
Hartsfield v. Wainwright
Hartsfield, pro se.
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen. of Florida, and A. G. Spicola, Jr., Asst. Atty Gen., for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hartranft v. Oliver

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
125 U.S. 525
Hartranft v. Oliver
[Statement of Case from pages 525-526 intentionally omitted]
Sol. Gen. Jenks, for plaintiff in error.
E. L. Perkins, for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice FIELD, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hartranft v. Wiegmann

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
121 U.S. 609
Hartranft v. Wiegmann
[ Sol. Gen. Jenks, for plaintiff in error.
F. P. Prichard, for defendant in error.
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hartsfield v. Wainwright/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 782
Hartsfield v. Wainwright
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hartranft v. Winters

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
121 U.S. 616
Hartranft v. Winters
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In die Nativitatis

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "In die Nativitatis."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "In die Natiuitatis", Middle English Christmas carol ("Meruele noȝt, iosep, on Mary mylde").
* "In die Nativitatis", Middle English Christmas carol ("The borys hede that we bryng here").
* "In die Nativitatis", Middle English Christmas carol ("I am here, syre cristsmasse").
# In dulci jubilo

"The original song text, a macaronic alternation of Medieval German and Latin, is thought to have been written by the German mystic Heinrich Seuse circa 1328. According to folklore, Seuse heard angels sing these words and joined them in a dance of worship." Warning: template has been deprecated.
English-language translations of In dulci jubilo include:
* "Let Jubil-Trumpets Blow", anonymous (1708).
* "Good Christian Men, Rejoice" by John Mason Neale (1854).
# In lands I never saw—they say

* "In lands I never saw, they say" in Poems: Second Series (1891)
* "In lands I never saw, they say" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# Jess & Co.

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
It is just the story of a man who is a born procrastinator, and who, added to this, has made the mistake of choosing an uncongenial trade; he is a glazier, when nature plainly intended to make him a gardener. ... The story deals with the resolution that the young wife makes to transform her man, in spite of himself, into a good, industrious, systematic business man. —From the review in The Bookman, Oct 1904. [Full review(s)] are on the Discussion page
JESS & CO.
BY
J. J. BELL
AUTHOR OF "LATER ADVENTURES OF WEE MACGREEGOR" "WEE MACGREEGOR," "ETHEL," ETC. ETC.
HARPER & BROTHERS PUBLISHERS NEW YORK AND LONDON • 1904
Copyright, 1904, by J. J. Bell.
All rights reserved.
Published September, 1904.
TO
MY MOTHER

### CONTENTS

* chap.page
* I. Roses and Rue 1
* II. In the Wood 29
* III. A Way Out 51
* IV. Aunt Wallace at Home 74
* V. The Gentleman from Glasgow 97
* VI. A Little Warmth and a Blaze 119
* VII. "Profit and Loss" 143
* VIII. Some Friends and an Enemy 171
* IX. Figures, but Not All Dry 196
* X. Mr. Ogilvy has Customers 221
* XI. "There was Sadness in Kinlochan" 250
* XII. Home Again 277
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1934, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 89 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hopkins Federal Savings Loan Association v. Cleary Reliance Building & Loan Association

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
296 U.S. 315
Hopkins Federal Savings Loan Association v. Cleary Reliance Building & Loan Association
Argued: Nov. 18, 19, 1935. --- Decided: Dec 9, 1935
[Syllabus from pages 315-316 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Emery J. Woodall, of New York City, and Horace Russell, of Washington, D.C., for petitioners.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 316-320 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Benjamin Poss and Joseph P. Brazy, both of Milwaukee, Wis., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 320-327 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice CARDOZO delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hopkins v. Bacon

United States Supreme Court
282 U.S. 122
Hopkins v. Bacon
Argued: Nov. 24, 1930. ---
The Attorney General and Mr. Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Messrs. Palmer Hutcheson, of Houston, Tex., Harry C. Weeks, of Wichita Falls, Tax., and Rhodes S. Baker, of Dallas, Tex., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 123-124 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hopkins v. Cohen

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    White
United States Supreme Court
390 U.S. 530
Hopkins v. Cohen, Acting Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
No. 276. Argued: March 11-12, 1968 --- Decided: April 2, 1968
The provision in § 206 (b)(1) of the Social Security Act limiting an attorney's fee to "25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason of such judgment," held, does not restrict the fee to the percentage of the accrued benefits awarded the permanently disabled claimant, but includes as well the benefits accrued to his dependents by virtue of the disability. Pp. 531-535.
374 F. 2d 726, reversed.
Allen Sharp and Harold H. Gearinger argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the briefs was Israel Steingold.
Harris Weinstein argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl and Morton Hollander.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Infantry, Part I: Regular Army /The Second World War

U.S. Army Center for Military History publication

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Infantry, Part I: Regular Army /Preface

U.S. Army Center for Military History publication
* Washington, D.C.
* 15 April 1971
* JOHN K. MAHON
* ROMANA DANYSH

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Infantry, Part I: Regular Army /The Authors

U.S. Army Center for Military History publication
* John K. Mahon received the B.A. degree from Swarthmore College in 1934 and the Ph.D. degree in history from the University of California, Los Angeles, in 1950. He served with the Army on active duty from 1942 to 1946 and as a civilian historian in the Office of the Chief of Military History from 1951 to 1954. A professor of history at the University of Florida since 1954 and Chairman of the Department of History since 1965, he is author of works on the early militia and of History of the Second Seminole War, 1835-1842.
* Romana Danysh graduated from Barnard College in 1962 and received the M.A. degree in history from Stanford University in 1963. Since 1964. she has served as a historian in the Organizational History Branch of the Office of the Chief of Military History.
# Infantry, Part I: Regular Army / The Civil War

U.S. Army Center for Military History publication
* Shiloh :(6-7 April 1862) :560
* Fair Oaks :(31 May-1 June 1862) :650
* Chancellorsville:(1-5 May 1863) :530
* Gettysburg :(1-3 July 1863) :375
* Chickamauga :(19-20 September 1863):440
* Wilderness :(5-7 May 1864) :440

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Infantry, Part I: Regular Army /World War II to Korea

U.S. Army Center for Military History publication

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Infantry, Part I: Regular Army / A Diverse Half Century, 1866-1915

U.S. Army Center for Military History publication
* 43rd consolidated with the 1st to form the new 1st
* 16th consolidated with the 2nd to form the new 2nd
* Half of the 37th consolidated with the 3rd to form the new 3rd
* 30th consolidated with the 4th to form the new 4th
* Half of the 37th consolidated with the 5th to form the new 5th
* 42nd consolidated with the 6th to form the new 6th
* 36th consolidated with the 7th to form the new 7th
* 33rd consolidated with the 8th to form the new 8th
* 27th consolidated with the 9th to form the new 9th
* 26th consolidated with the 10th to form the new 10th
* 24th consolidated with the 29th to form the new 11th
* 12th Infantry not affected
* 13th Infantry not affected
* 45th consolidated with the 14th to form the new 14th
* 35th consolidated with the 15th to form the new 15th
* 11th consolidated with the 34th to form the new 16th
* 44th consolidated with the 17th to form the new 17th
* 25th consolidated with the 18th to form the new 18th
* 28th consolidated with the 19th to form the new 19th
* 20th Infantry not affected
* 32nd consolidated with the 21st to form the new 21st
* 31st consolidated with the 22nd to form the new 22nd
* 23rd Infantry not affected
* 38th consolidated with the 41st to form the new 24th
* 39th consolidated with the 40th to form the new 25th
* The machine gun made its greatest advance when Hiram Maxim, an American inventor, patented one in 1883 which eliminated the need for a hand crank by operating on the energy of its own recoil. The United States experimented with it as early as 1888 but did not adopt it officially until the first decade of the twentieth century. Tests made in 1910 showed that one machine gun was equal to sixteen riflemen at ranges up to 600 yards; to twenty-two men from 600 to 1,200; and to thirty-nine men beyond 1,200 yards. Comparing these figures with those given for tests in the 1870's, it is clear that the repeating rifle had reduced the discrepancy between shoulder arms and machine guns a good deal. In any case, on account of the unwieldiness of the weapon and for other reasons,, official doctrine on the machine gun remained very conservative.
* This did not, however, prevent experiments in organization to utilize it. In 1906, for example, a provisional machine gun platoon of twenty-one men and two Vickers-Maxim guns was added to each regiment. Although the Secretary of War reported three years later that this arrangement had not worked well, the salient fact is that infantry regiments were never again without machine guns. In February 1908, an experimental company was constituted, headed by John H. Parker, now a captain. This company, although it went through several changes in organization, was the forerunner of the machine gun companies of infantry regiments in World War I.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Infantry, Part I: Regular Army /ROAD and Flexible Response

U.S. Army Center for Military History publication
* The increase was at first mainly the result of federalizing two Army National Guard divisions. The 32nd Infantry Division from Wisconsin with five organic infantry battle groups and the 49th Armored Division from Texas with its four armored rifle battalions were federalized on 15 October 1961. An Army Reserve training division, the 100th, was also ordered into active military service. Thus, the reserve components played an important role during the Berlin crisis. However, in order to be prepared for such crises in the future, a buildup in Regular Army strength was necessary. To satisfy this need, existing units were made more combat ready and two additional divisions were authorized. In February 1962 the 1st Armored Division and the 5th Infantry Division (Mechanized) were activated. These divisions and their organic elements became the first units to be organized under the new ROAD concept.
* By the time the ROAD reorganization was officially completed in June 1964, active infantry strength had grown to 130,131, even though infantry units from the reserve components had reverted to reserve status. The Regular Army now had sixteen combat divisions: 5 infantry, 2 airborne, 4 armored, 4 mechanized infantry, and I cavalry (organized as infantry), with 107 organic infantry battalions among them. Sixteen infantry battalions were assigned to seven separate brigades: 3 infantry, 1 airborne, 1 armored, and 2 mechanized infantry. There were also three battalions assigned to the 11th Air Assault Division (Test) , four separate battalions, and five separate companies. One unit was still designated a battle group; it was the 1st Battle Group, 1st Infantry, active at zero strength at West Point. From this total of 136 infantry units, 67 were stationed in the continental United States and 69 were overseas with 31 in West Germany, 19 in Korea, and the remainder in Okinawa, Hawaii, Alaska, Berlin, and the Canal Zone.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Infantry, Part I: Regular Army /The Korean War

U.S. Army Center for Military History publication

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Infantry, Part I: Regular Army /The War in Vietnam

U.S. Army Center for Military History publication
________________________________________

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Infantry, Part I: Regular Army /The Pentomic Concept and CARS

U.S. Army Center for Military History publication

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Interstate Transit v. Lindsey

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
283 U.S. 183
Interstate Transit v. Lindsey
Argued: March 19, 1931. --- Decided: April 13, 1931
[Syllabus from pages 183-184 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. J. Carlton Loser, of Nashville, Tenn., and Thomas L. Tallentire, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.
Mr. W. F. Barry, Jr., of Nashville, Tenn., for appellee.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# I Had a Little Nut Tree

"I Had a Little Nut Tree" is an English language nursery rhyme. It has a Roud Folk Song Index number of 3749.
The song mentions a visit by the daughter of the King of Spain to request nutmeg and a pear. James Orchard Halliwell suggested that the song commemorates the 1506 visit of the Queen regnant Joanna of Castile to the English court of her brother-in-law, Henry VIII. However, the oldest known version of the song dates to 1797. Warning: template has been deprecated.
* "The Nut Tree" in A Book of Nursery Songs and Rhymes (1895)
* "I had a little Nut Tree" in The Baby's Opera (1900)