OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Statement of President Joe Biden on the Passing of Former Secretary George Shultz

Published 2021-02-07.
Few people did as much to shape the trajectory of American diplomacy and American influence in the 20th century as George Shultz. He was a gentleman of honor and ideas, dedicated to public service and respectful debate, even into his 100th year on Earth. That’s why multiple presidents, of both political parties, sought his counsel. I regret that, as president, I will not be able to benefit from his wisdom, as have so many of my predecessors.
For a man so inked into the pages of our history, his mind was always keyed toward the future. He focused on the possibilities of what could be, unhindered by the impasses or deadlocks of the past. That was the vision and dedication that helped guide our nation through some of its most dangerous periods and ultimately helped create the opening that led to the end the Cold War. And, while he and I sometimes argued the opposite sides of issues when I was a young senator, I was proud to often find common ground on issues vital to the security and prosperity of the American people.
As the driving force behind the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces treaty, Secretary Shultz made real the critical concept that we should work to negotiate with our adversaries where possible in order to make life better and safer for our people. I also admired Secretary Shultz’s commitment to pressing for the rights and release of Refuseniks, raising them directly with his counterparts in the Soviet Union.
He was a man of incredible courage. Whether it was donning the uniform of the United States Marines to defend the cause of liberty in World War II, or speaking out directly to the President of the United States when he disagreed with a policy, George Shultz knew when to stand and fight. For the young women and men whose minds he helped shape throughout his career, there was no better role model for a life of integrity and service than George Shultz.
Jill and I send our deepest condolences to the entire Shultz family—his wife, children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren. Our nation mourns his loss along with you even as we honor his lifetime of patriotic service.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Statement of Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald, June 27, 2005

Office of Special Counsel
Office of Special Counsel
Patrick J. Fitzgerald Special Counsel
Chicago Office: Dirksen Federal Building 219 South Dearborn Street, Fifth Floor Chicago, Illinois 60604 (312) 353-5300
Washington Office: Bond Federal Building 1400 New York Avenue NW, Ninth Floor Washington, DC 20530 (202) 514-1187
Please address all correspondence to the Washington Office
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MONDAY JUNE 27, 2005
PRESS CONTACT: Randall Samborn (312) 353-5318
STATEMENT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL
Statement of Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald regarding today’s decision by the United States Supreme Court to deny a writ of certiorari in the matters captioned Judith Miller v. United States of America, and Matthew Cooper and Time, Inc. v. United States of America, Nos. 04-1507 and 04-1508:
    "The lower courts that thoroughly reviewed this matter ruled that reporters do not have a First Amendment privilege to refuse to comply with a grand jury subpoena issued in good faith, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in the Branzburg case in 1972. Further, the lower courts also held that even if a qualified privilege existed, the Special Counsel’s reasons for needing the reporters’ testimony overcame any such privilege, and the Court of Appeals said the government had shown a “critical need” for the reporters to comply with the subpoenas. Following each ruling in the lower courts, the Special Counsel agreed to a stay of the civil contempt sanctions imposed after the reporters and Time, Inc. refused to comply with court orders to allow them to fully pursue their appeals.
    Today, the Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal, which allows the decision of the lower courts to stand, preserving the legal precedent it established more than 30 years ago. As noted in our Court filings, by October 2004 when the appeal in this matter was first filed, the factual investigation – other than the testimony from these reporters and any further investigation that might result – was for all practical purposes completed.
    Now that the legal obligations of the reporters are settled and all appeals exhausted, we look forward to resuming our progress in this investigation and bringing it to a prompt conclusion on behalf of the citizens we represent."
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Securities and Exchange Commission v. New England Electric System (390 U.S. 207)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
390 U.S. 207
Securities and Exchange Commission v. New England Electric System et al.
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
No. 305. Argued: January 18, 1968 --- Decided: March 5, 1968
This Court previously held (384 U.S. 176) that the SEC was warranted in ruling that § 11 (b)(1)(A) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 prohibits a public utility holding company from retaining an integrated gas utility system in addition to its integrated electric system unless the gas system could not be operated separately without a loss of economies causing a serious impairment of that system. After remand, the Court of Appeals reviewed the evidence and concluded that the SEC erred in finding that New England Electric System failed to prove a case for retention of its integrated gas system.
Held: Since the SEC's determination that divestiture of the gas system would not entail a loss of economies likely to cause serious impairment of the system involved the application of expert judgment which had adequate support in the record, the Court of Appeals should have affirmed the SEC order and should not have indulged in an unwarranted incursion into the administrative domain. Pp. 211-221.
376 F. 2d 107, reversed and remanded.
Daniel M. Friedman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Griswold, Robert S. Rifkind, Philip A. Loomis, Jr., David Ferber, Roger S. Foster and Richard E. Nathan.
John R. Quarles argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Richard B. Dunn, Richard W. Southgate and John J. Glessner III.
George Spiegel filed a brief for the Municipal Electric Association of Massachusetts, as amicus curiae, urging reversal.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Securities and Exchange Commission v. New England Electric System (384 U.S. 176)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
384 U.S. 176
Securities and Exchange Commission v. New England Electric System
Argued: March 23, 1966. --- Decided: May 16, 1966
Philip A. Loomis, Jr., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
John R. Quarles, Boston, Mass., for respondents.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co., 346 U.S. 119 (1953), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a corporation offering "key employees" stock shares is still subject to Section 4(1) of the Securities Act of 1933. Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
346 U.S. 119
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Company
Argued: April 28, 1953. --- Decided: June 8, 1953
Mr. Roger S. Foster, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Thomas S. McPheeters, St. Louis, Mo., for respondent.
Mr. Justice CLARK, delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Securities and Exchange Commission v. United Benefit Life Insurance Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
387 U.S. 202
Securities and Exchange Commission v. United Benefit Life Insurance Company
Argued: April 10, 1967. --- Decided: May 22, 1967
[Syllabus from pages 202-203 intentionally omitted]
ThurgoodMarshall, Sol. Gen., for petitioner.
Daniel J. McCauley, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Securities and Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
310 U.S. 434
Securities and Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Company
Argued: April 29, 30, 1940. --- Decided: May 27, 1940
[Syllabus from pages 434-436 intentionally omitted]
Robert H. Jackson, Atty. Gen., and Francis Biddle, Sol. Gen., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 436-438 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Joseph M. Hartfield and Henry M. Marx, both of New York City, for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from Pages 439-440 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Spirella Catalogue (1933)/51

| STYLE 9028—CORSET | THE 9028 SERIES—SLENDER OR 20-TYPE | THE 9028 SERIES—SLENDER OR 20-TYPE |
| | ADAPTABILITY—This series is designed for the average 20-type figure. The front lacing adjustment makes the design specifically corrective for conditions on the front of the body. The front lacing, with the flat stay on each side of centre back, regulates the abdominal control and aids in the correction of "floating" kidney, prolapsed internal organs and Gorilla Poise. The design conforms comfortably to the figure over the hip bones, snugs the abdomen and gives a smooth, pleasing back line. Basic Features—Elastic Gores in Skirt; Close Fitting Skirt. (See pages 74 to 76.) MEASUREMENTS Waist Sizes—22 to 30. Hip Sizes-May be ordered 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9 inches larger than waist, without extra charge. Style 9027 (Top is 1 inches larger than waist) F 1 CB 1 UA 1 B 1½ F 6 or 6½ (TF 9½) H 12 B 11½ Style 9028 (Top is 1 inches larger than waist) F 1½ CB 1½ UA 1½ B 2 F 6½ or (TF 10½) H 13½ B 12½ Style 9029 (Top is 2 inches larger than waist) F 1½ CB 1½ UA 2 B 2½ F 7 or 7½ (TF 11) H 14½ B 13 HOW TO ORDER—The style in the series to order is determined by the client's centre front below measurement; but when there is more than one style in the series with the correct centre front below measurement, choose the one which has also the back below measurement nearest to the client's needs. No corset is complete without a brassiere. For complete information on How to Order, see page 76. | ADAPTABILITY—This series is designed for the average 20-type figure. The front lacing adjustment makes the design specifically corrective for conditions on the front of the body. The front lacing, with the flat stay on each side of centre back, regulates the abdominal control and aids in the correction of "floating" kidney, prolapsed internal organs and Gorilla Poise. The design conforms comfortably to the figure over the hip bones, snugs the abdomen and gives a smooth, pleasing back line. Basic Features—Elastic Gores in Skirt; Close Fitting Skirt. (See pages 74 to 76.) MEASUREMENTS Waist Sizes—22 to 30. Hip Sizes-May be ordered 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9 inches larger than waist, without extra charge. Style 9027 (Top is 1 inches larger than waist) F 1 CB 1 UA 1 B 1½ F 6 or 6½ (TF 9½) H 12 B 11½ Style 9028 (Top is 1 inches larger than waist) F 1½ CB 1½ UA 1½ B 2 F 6½ or (TF 10½) H 13½ B 12½ Style 9029 (Top is 2 inches larger than waist) F 1½ CB 1½ UA 2 B 2½ F 7 or 7½ (TF 11) H 14½ B 13 HOW TO ORDER—The style in the series to order is determined by the client's centre front below measurement; but when there is more than one style in the series with the correct centre front below measurement, choose the one which has also the back below measurement nearest to the client's needs. No corset is complete without a brassiere. For complete information on How to Order, see page 76. |
| 50 | For materials and prices, see Price List. | 51 |
# Spirella Catalogue (1933)/59

| STYLE 9065—CORSET | THE 9064 SERIES—MEDIUM OR 60-TYPE | THE 9064 SERIES—MEDIUM OR 60-TYPE |
| | ADAPTABILITY—This series is designed for the average 60-type figure. The front lacing adjustment makes the design specifically corrective for conditions on the front of the body. The front lacing, with the flat stay on each side of centre back, regulates the abdominal control and aids in the correction of ab- dominal flesh, "floating" kidney, prolapsed internal organs and Gorilla Poise. The design gives a smooth, pleasing back line. Basic Features—Concealed Back Lacing; Inner Belt; Elastic Gores in Skirt; Close Fitting Skirt. (See pages 74 to 76.) MEASUREMENTS Waist Sizes—28 to 36. Hip Sizes-May be ordered 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9 inches larger than waist, without extra charge. Style 9064 (Top is 2 inches larger than waist) F 1½ CB 1 UA 2 B 2½ F 6½ or 7 (TF 10½) H 13 B 13 Style 9065 (Top is 2 inches larger than waist) F 2 CB 1½ UA 2 B 2½ F 7 or 7½ (TF 11½) H 14 B 13½ Style 9066 (Top is 3 inches larger than waist) F 2½ CB 2 UA 2½ B 3 F 7 or 7½ (TF 13) H 15½ B 15 HOW TO ORDER—The style in the series to order is determined by the client's centre front below measurement; but when there is more than one style in the series with the correct centre front below measurement, choose the one which has also the back below measurement nearest to the client's needs. No corset is complete without a brassiere. For complete information on How to Order, see page 76. | ADAPTABILITY—This series is designed for the average 60-type figure. The front lacing adjustment makes the design specifically corrective for conditions on the front of the body. The front lacing, with the flat stay on each side of centre back, regulates the abdominal control and aids in the correction of ab- dominal flesh, "floating" kidney, prolapsed internal organs and Gorilla Poise. The design gives a smooth, pleasing back line. Basic Features—Concealed Back Lacing; Inner Belt; Elastic Gores in Skirt; Close Fitting Skirt. (See pages 74 to 76.) MEASUREMENTS Waist Sizes—28 to 36. Hip Sizes-May be ordered 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9 inches larger than waist, without extra charge. Style 9064 (Top is 2 inches larger than waist) F 1½ CB 1 UA 2 B 2½ F 6½ or 7 (TF 10½) H 13 B 13 Style 9065 (Top is 2 inches larger than waist) F 2 CB 1½ UA 2 B 2½ F 7 or 7½ (TF 11½) H 14 B 13½ Style 9066 (Top is 3 inches larger than waist) F 2½ CB 2 UA 2½ B 3 F 7 or 7½ (TF 13) H 15½ B 15 HOW TO ORDER—The style in the series to order is determined by the client's centre front below measurement; but when there is more than one style in the series with the correct centre front below measurement, choose the one which has also the back below measurement nearest to the client's needs. No corset is complete without a brassiere. For complete information on How to Order, see page 76. |
| 58 | For materials and prices, see Price List. | 59 |
# Spirella Catalogue (1933)/67

| STYLE 9138—CORSET | THE 9137 SERIES—STOUT OR 30-TYPE | THE 9137 SERIES—STOUT OR 30-TYPE |
| | ADAPTABILITY—This series is designed for the average 30-type figure. The front lacing adjustment makes the design specifically corrective for conditions on the front of the body. The front lacing, with the flat stay on each side of centre back, regulates the abdominal control and aids in the correction of ab- dominal flesh, if not excessive, "floating" kidney, prolapsed internal organs and Gorilla Poise. The design gives a smooth, pleasing back line. Basic Features—Inner Belt; Close Fitting Skirt. (See pages 74 to 76.) MEASUREMENTS Waist Sizes—32 to 44. Larger sizes, special see Price List. Hip Sizes-May be ordered 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 inches larger than waist, without extra charge. Style 9137 (Top is 2 inches larger than waist) F 1½ CB 1 UA 2 B 2½ F 6½ or 7 (TF 10½) H 13½ B 13 Style 9138 (Top is 3 inches larger than waist) F 2 CB 1½ UA 2½ B 3 F 7 or 7½ (TF 11½) H 14½ B 14 Style 9139 (Top is 4 inches larger than waist) F 2½ CB 2 UA 3 B 3½ F 7½ or 8 (TF 13) H 16 B 15½ HOW TO ORDER—The style in the series to order is determined by the client's centre front below measurement; but when there is more than one style in the series with the correct centre front below measurement, choose the one which has also the back below measurement nearest to the client's needs. No corset is complete without a brassiere. For complete information on How to Order, see page 76. | ADAPTABILITY—This series is designed for the average 30-type figure. The front lacing adjustment makes the design specifically corrective for conditions on the front of the body. The front lacing, with the flat stay on each side of centre back, regulates the abdominal control and aids in the correction of ab- dominal flesh, if not excessive, "floating" kidney, prolapsed internal organs and Gorilla Poise. The design gives a smooth, pleasing back line. Basic Features—Inner Belt; Close Fitting Skirt. (See pages 74 to 76.) MEASUREMENTS Waist Sizes—32 to 44. Larger sizes, special see Price List. Hip Sizes-May be ordered 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 inches larger than waist, without extra charge. Style 9137 (Top is 2 inches larger than waist) F 1½ CB 1 UA 2 B 2½ F 6½ or 7 (TF 10½) H 13½ B 13 Style 9138 (Top is 3 inches larger than waist) F 2 CB 1½ UA 2½ B 3 F 7 or 7½ (TF 11½) H 14½ B 14 Style 9139 (Top is 4 inches larger than waist) F 2½ CB 2 UA 3 B 3½ F 7½ or 8 (TF 13) H 16 B 15½ HOW TO ORDER—The style in the series to order is determined by the client's centre front below measurement; but when there is more than one style in the series with the correct centre front below measurement, choose the one which has also the back below measurement nearest to the client's needs. No corset is complete without a brassiere. For complete information on How to Order, see page 76. |
| 66 | For materials and prices, see Price List. | 67 |
# Spirella Catalogue (1933)/5

INTERNATIONAL HONOURS AND AWARDS :
| Palme d'Or, International Institute of Hygiene, Paris | Grand Prix with Palm, Paris | Grand Prix, International Medical Congress, Paris |
| Cup of Honour, Milan | | Cross of Honour, Milan |
| Grand Prix, Belgium | Gran Premio, Rome | Grand Prix, Bristol |
| Gold Medal and Diploma of Merit awarded Spirella by the International Exposition of Cuba. |||
SPIRELLA IS ENDORSED BY THE PHYSICIAN
All that has been said in Spirella Text-Books in regard to the value of Spirella Figure Training and Supporting Garments has been endorsed by many physicians And surgeons throughout the United States, Canada, Great Britain, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, and wherever Spirella Garments are known.
The International Medical Congress of Paris awarded Spirella its Grand Prix and Diploma of Merit. The International Institute of Hygiene, Paris highest authority among physicians — granted Spirella Corsets the Palme d'Or (blue riband of the medical world).
On the opposite page is shown the Certificate of Merit and Gold Seal received from the Institute of Hygiene, London. This Institute has granted Spirella Garments its Certificate of Merit each successive year since 1911. Spirella Figure Training and Supporting Garments must be submitted each year to an examining board of physicians, and the Gold Seal is evidence that the Standard of Quality and Merit has been consistently maintained. The Institute endorses Spirella Fitting Garments and pronounces them "A valuable development in the science of Corsetry."
Extracts from JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTE OF HYGIENE—
"The greatest care and skill have been expended in designing Spirella Garments upon rational lines. Support and control are secured from the design and cut of the garment, with the result that there is no constriction of, nor pressure upon, the organs of the body.
"The Spirella Company are to be commended not only for the excellence of their garments but also for their efforts to see that designs are intelligently supplied to wearers, and that wearers use them properly after purchase."
HIGHEST FASHION AUTHORITIES ENDORSE SPIRELLA
Spirella Garments have been awarded the highest awards whenever they have been entered at National or International Expositions. On the opposite page are shown facsimiles of some of the honours bestowed by great fashion expositions of the world.
In Points of Health and Style Recognition Spirella is Without a Peer.