OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Harmonium (Stevens)/Cy Est Pourtraicte, Madame Ste Ursule, et Les Unze Mille Vierges

Cy Est Pourtraicte, Madame Ste Ursule, et Les Unze Mille Vierges
# Harmonium (Stevens)/Another Weeping Woman

Another Weeping Woman
# Harmonium (Stevens)/Cortège for Rosenbloom

Cortège for Rosenbloom
Now, wry Rosenbloom is dead
And his finical carriers tread,
On a hundred legs, the tread
Of the dead.
Rosenbloom is dead.
They carry the wizened one
Of the color of horn
To the sullen hill,
Treading a tread
In unison for the dead.
Rosenbloom is dead.
The tread of the carriers does not halt
On the hill, but turns
Up the sky.
They are bearing his body into the sky.
It is the infants of misanthropes
And the infants of nothingness
That tread
The wooden ascents
Of the ascending of the dead.
It is turbans they wear
And boots of fur ​As they tread the boards
In a region of frost,
Viewing the frost.
To a chirr of gongs
And a chitter of cries
And the heavy thrum
Of the endless tread
That they tread.
To a jangle of doom
And a jumble of words
Of the intense poem
Of the strictest prose
Of Rosenbloom.
And they bury him there,
Body and soul,
In a place in the sky.
The lamentable tread!
Rosenbloom is dead.
# Harmonium (Stevens)/Anecdote of Men by the Thousand

Anecdote of Men by the Thousand
# Harmonium (Stevens)/Colloquy with a Polish Aunt

Colloquy with a Polish Aunt
Elle savait toutes les légendes du Paradis et tous les contes de la Pologne.Revue des Deux Mondes
She
How is it that my saints from Voragine,
In their embroidered slippers, touch your spleen?
He
Old pantaloons, duenna of the spring!
She
Imagination is the will of things. . . .
Thus, on the basis of the common drudge,
You dream of women, swathed in indigo,
Holding their books toward the nearer stars,
To read, in secret, burning secrecies. . . .
# Harmonium (Stevens)/Bantams in Pine-Woods

Bantams in Pine-Woods
# Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar/81. Derivation of Nouns

Layout 2
a Nouns are by their derivation either primitive, i.e. cannot be referred to any verbal stem at present extant (see § 82), such as אָב father, אֵם mother (but see both words in the Lexicon; according to Stade and others אָב, אֵם, &c., are children’s words and terms of endearment, and so really primitive nouns), or derivative, i.e. either Derivativa verbalia (§§ 83–85), e.g. רָם high, רָמָה high place, מָרוֹם height, from רוּם to be high, or less frequently Derivativa denominativa (§ 86), e.g. מַרְגְּלוֹת the place at the feet, from רֶ֫גֶל foot.
b Rem. 1. The earlier grammarians consider the verb alone as stem, and therefore all nouns as verbals, dividing them into (a) Formae nudae, i.e. such as have only the three (or two) radicals, and (b) Formae auctae, such as have formative letters or syllables added at the beginning or end, e.g. מַמְלָכָה, מַלְכוּת. The formative letters used for this purpose are ה א מ נ ת י ו (הֶֽאֱמַנְתִּיו), and the treatment of nouns formerly followed this order.
c According to the view of roots and stems presented in § 30 d, nouns (other than denominatives) are derived not from the verbal stem, but either from the (abstract) root or from the still undefined stem. In the following pages, however, the arrangement according to the verbal stem is retained as being simpler for the beginner. Cf. § 79 a.
d 2. Compound nouns as appellatives are very rare in Hebrew, e.g. בְּלִיַּ֫עַל worthlessness, baseness. On the other hand, they very frequently occur as proper names, e.g. גַּבְרִיאֵל (man of God), יְהֽוֹיָקִים (Yahwe raises up), יְהֽוֹנָתָן (Yahwe gave), &c.
* ↑ From this vox memorialis the nomina aucta are also called by the older grammarians nomina heemantica.
* ↑ G. Rammelt (Über die zusammengesetzten Nomina im Hebr., Halle, 1883, and Leipzig, 1884) recognizes as appellatives only צְפַרְדֵּעַ (cf. below, § 85 w) and צַלְמָ֫וֶת (the latter certainly incorrectly [see, however, Nöldeke, ZATW. 1897, p. 183 ff.]). In p. 8 ff. the author gives a list of ‘logical compounds’, i.e. new terms formed by composition with the negatives לֹא, בְּלִי, מִבְּלִי.
# Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar/78. Verba Defectiva

Layout 2
a It often happens, when two kindred weak verbs are in use with the same meaning, that both are defective, i.e. do not occur in all the forms. Since, however, those tenses and forms which are not in use in the one verb are generally supplied by the other, they mutually complete one another, and thus form together, as it were, an entire ​verb, as in Greek ἔρχομαι, aor. ἦλθον, fut. ἐλεύσομαι, and in Latin fero, tuli, latum, ferre, &c., but with this difference, that in Hebrew the roots of these verbs are almost always closely related.
b The most common verbs of this kind are—
בּשׁ to be ashamed. Hiphʿîl הֵבִישׁ (inferred from הֱבִישׁ֫וֹתָ), but also הֹבִישׁ, הוֹבִישׁ as if from יבשׁ, on the analogy of verbs פ״ו; also in Is 30 the Q$^e$rê requires הֹבִישׁ, where the K$^e$thîbh has הִבְאִישׁ from בָּאַשׁ.
טוֹב to be good. Perfect טוֹב; but imperfect יִיטַב. and Hiphʿîl הֵיטִיב from יָטַב (but cf. הֱטִיבֹ֫תָ 2 K 10).
יָגׄר to be afraid. Imperfect יָגוּר (from גּוּר).
יָקַץ to awake, only in the imperf. יִיקַץ; for the perfect, the Hiphʿîl הֵקִיץ is used (from קוּץ).
נָפַץ to break in pieces. Imperfect יָפוּץ (from פּוּץ). Imperative פּוּץ. Niphʿal נָפוֹץ. Piʿēl נִפֵּץ (from נָפַץ). Pôlēl פּוֹצֵץ (from פּוּץ). reflexive הִתְפּוֹצֵץ. Hiphʿîl הֵפִיץ. Also פִּצְפֵּץ Jb 16.
נָצַב (Qal in post-biblical Hebrew, in Aramaic and Arabic) to place, whence (possibly) Niphʿal נִצַּב and Hiph‛îl הִצִיב (see above, § 71); but Hithpaʿēl הִתְיַצֵּב.
שָׁתָה to drink, used in Qal; but in Hiph. הִשְׁקָה to give to drink, from a Qal שָׁקָה which is not used in Hebrew.
On הָלַךְ (יָלַךְ) to go, see above, § 69 x.
c Rem. 1. To the same category belong also, to a certain extent, those cases where the tenses or moods not in use in one conjugation, are supplied by forms having the same meaning in other conjugations of the same verb. Thus:
יָסַף to add. The infinitive (but cf. § 69 h, note) and imperfect, unused in Qal, are supplied by the Hiphʿîl הוֹסִיף, יוֹסִיף (on יוֹסֵף as imperfect indicative, see § 109 d, cf. also § 109 i).
כָּשַׁל to stumble. Perfect from Qal, imperfect from Niphʿal.
נגשׁ to approach, unused in perf. Qal, instead of which Niphʿal נִגַּשׁ is used; but imperfect יִגַּשׁ, imperative גַּשׁ, and infinitive גֶּ֫שֶׁת from Qal only are in use.
נָחָה to lead. Perfect usually נָחָה in Qal, so imperative נְחֵה, but imperfect and infinitive always in Hiphʿîl.
נתך to be poured out. Perfect Niphʿal נִתַּךְ with imperfect Qal יִתַּךְ, but the perfect Qal and imperfect Niphʿal are not in use.
2. The early grammarians often speak of mixed forms (formae mixtae), i.e. forms which unite the supposed character and meaning of two different tenses, genders, or conjugations. Most of the examples adduced are at once set aside by accurate grammatical analysis; some others appear to have arisen from misapprehension and inaccuracy, especially from erroneous views of unusual plene forms. Others, again, are either merely wrong readings or represent an intentional conflation of two different readings.
# Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar/79. The Noun. General View

Layout 2
CHAPTER III
THE NOUN
For the literature, see De Lagarde, Uebersicht über die im Aram., Arab. und Hebr. übliche Bildung der Nomina, Göttingen, 1889; Index and Additions, 1891; J. Barth, Die Nominalbildung in den semitischen Sprachen, first half, Simple nouns, Leipzig, 1889; second half, Nouns with external additions, 1891; second edition, with indices of words and subjects, 1894; E. König, Historisch-kritisches Lehrgebäude, &c., ii. 1, Leipzig, 1895, see above, § 3 f.—Of these three important works the first two especially have given rise to various articles. In support of De Lagarde: Hommel in ZDMG. xliv, p. 535 ff. (against De Lagarde and Hommel: Barth, ibid., p. 679 ff.), and dealing with the Index, ZDMG. xlv, p. 340 ff.—Against Barth (though with many points of agreement): Philippi in the Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie, 1890, p. 344 ff. (answered by Barth in ZDMG. xliv, p. 692 ff.), and ZDMG. xlvi, p. 149 ff. (answered again by Barth, ibid., xlviii, p. 10 ff.), also in the Beiträge zur Assyriologie, ii (1892), p. 359 ff. ‘Die semitische Verbal- und Nominalbildung,’ and lastly, in ZDMG. xlix, p. 187 ff.—Cf. also A. Müller, ‘Semitische Nomina. Bemerkungen zu de Lagarde und Barth,’ ZDMG. xlv, p. 221 ff.—The main points at issue in the works of De Lagarde and Barth are indicated below, § 83 d.—Brockelmann, Semit. Sprachwiss., p. 104 ff.; Grundriss, p. 329 ff.
a 1. Since, according to § 30 a, most word-stems are developed into verbal stems as well as into noun-stems, it has become customary (especially in the Lexicon) to refer the noun to the most simple ground-form of the verbal formation, viz. the 3rd pers. sing. perfect Qal, and, as it were, to derive it from that form. This is usual, not only in those noun-stems which can be directly connected with a corresponding verbal stem (Nomina verbalia or derivativa, § 83 ff.), but also with Nomina primitiva, i.e. those of which no verbal stem is now found in Hebrew (see § 82), as well as finally with Nomina denominativa, which have evidently been derived from other nouns (§ 86).
The adjective agrees in form entirely with the substantive. On the formation of adjectival ideas by giving to abstracts a concrete sense, see § 83 c.
b 2. A special inflexion of the noun to express the various cases does not exist in Hebrew; only a few ancient and almost extinct traces of case-endings have survived (§ 90). The syntactical relation of a noun can therefore in general only be inferred from its position in the sentence, or from its being joined to prepositions. In either case, the form of the noun undergoes no change (except for the construct ​state, § 89), and the representation of case-relations belongs therefore almost exclusively to the syntax (§ 117 ff.). The comparative and superlative of adjectives also can be expressed only by a syntactical combination (§ 133). On the other hand, several changes in the forms of nouns are occasioned by the additions of the plural, dual, and feminine terminations, as well as of the pronominal suffixes, and also by the close connexion of two nouns, by means of the construct state.
# Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar/77. Relation of the Weak Verbs to one another

Layout 2
a The close relation which exists between some classes of the weak verbs (e.g. between פ״ו and פ״י, ל״א and ל״ה, ע״ע and ע״וּ, ע״ע and ל״ה) appears not only in their similarity or identity of inflexion, or their mutual interchange of certain forms, but especially from the fact that frequently the same root (radix bilittera, see § 30 g) recurs in various weak stems of similar meaning. The meaning accordingly is inherent in the two constant root-consonants, while the third consonant̤, which is weak (and the particular class of weak verbs with it), does not establish any difference in the meaning. Thus from the root דךְ there occur with the same meaning דָּכַךְ, דּוּךְ, דָּכָא to strike, to crush; and from the root נד there are נוּד, נָדַד, נָדָה to flee.
b In this manner the following classes are related in form and meaning:
1. Verbs ע״וּ and ע״ע in which the first and third consonants are the same in both, as being essential to the meaning; e.g. מוּךְ and מָכַךְ to become poor; מוּשׁ and מָשַׁשׁ to feel; נוּד and נָדַד to flee.
c 2. Verbs פ״י and פ״ן; e.g. יָצַב and נָצַב to place, נָקַשׁ and יָקשׁ (yāqōs̆) to lay snares. Moreover, stems belonging to the classes mentioned in 1 (especially ע״וּ) are frequently related also to verbs פ״י and פ״ן, e.g. גּוּר and יָגֹר to fear; טוֹב and יָטַב to be good; נָפַח and פּוּחַ to blow; נָפַץ and פּוּץ to dash to pieces. Verbs פ״א are less frequently connected with these classes, e.g. אָדַשׁ and דּוּשׁ to thresh, &c.
d 3. Verbs ל״א and ל״ה (in which the first two consonants form the real body of the stem) are sometimes related to each other, and sometimes to the above classes. To each other, in דָּכָא and דָּכָה to crush, קָרָא and קָרָה to meet (cf. § 75 nn); to verbs of the other classes, in מָצָה and מָצַץ to suck, דָּחָה and דּוּחַ to thrust, &c.
e 4. Verbs ע״ע and ל״ה, on which cf. Grimm, Journal of Bibl. Lit., 1903, p. 196; e.g. אָנָה and אָנַן to sigh, דָּמָה and דָּמַם to be quiet, חָנָה and חָנַן to incline, כָּלָה and כָּלַל to end, קָלָה and קָלַל to despise, שָׁגָה and שָׁגַג to err, שָׁחָה and שָׁחַח to bend down, שָׁסָה and שָׁסַס to plunder.
f 5. Verbs ע״וּ and ע״ה; e.g. מוּל and מָהַל (New Hebrew; in O.T. only מָהוּל Is 1) to circumcise, מוּר and מָהַר to exchange, נוּר (in מְנוֹרָה a light) and נָהַר to shine; cf. also לְהָטִים secret arts, Ex 7 with לָט secret, from לוּט.
# Herbert v. Bicknell

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
233 U.S. 70
Herbert v. Bicknell
Argued: March 12, 1914. --- Decided: April 6, 1914
Messrs. David L. Withington, William R. Castle, W. A. Greenwell, and Alfred L. Castle for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 71 intentionally omitted]
No counsel appeared for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Herbert v. Butler

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
97 U.S. 319
Herbert v. Butler
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.
This was an action brought by Herbert for money had and received for his use by Butler. Plea, general issue. The parties were the only witnesses in the case. Judgment for the defendant. Herbert sued out this writ of error.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Jasper K. Herbert for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. Thomas J. Durant, contra.
MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Herbert v. Shanley Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
242 U.S. 591
Herbert v. Shanley Company
Argued: January 10, 1917. --- Decided: January 22, 1917
Messrs. Nathan Burkan and William J. Hughes for petitioner in no. 427.
Messrs. Levi Cooke, Abraham S. Gilbert, and Francis Gilbert for respondent in No. 427.
Messrs. Louis J. Vorhaus, Moses H. Grossman, and William Grossman for petitioner in No. 433.
[Argument of Counsel from page 592 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Charles J. Campbell, Frank A. K. Boland, and Levi Cooke for respondents in No. 433.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gelpcke v. City of Dubuque (68 U.S. 220)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
68 U.S. 220
Gelpcke v. City of Dubuque (68 U.S. 220)
THIS suit differed from 80-the principal one-only in the fact that the bonds of the city, which in this case bore date 1st September, 1855, were issued prior to the passage of the act of 28th January, 1857, specially authorizing the city to subscribe to the railroads for which the bonds in No. 80 had been subsequently given. The bonds rested in this case (No. 81), therefore, on the charter of the city (approved February 24, 1847), authorizing it 'to borrow money for public purposes,' and on an act passed 25th January, 1855, before the bonds were issued, one section of which enacted that whenever 'any company shall have received, or may hereafter receive, the bonds of any city or county upon subscription of stock by such city or county, such bonds may bear an interest at a rate not exceeding ten per cent., and may be sold by the company at such discount as may be deemed expedient,' and which enacted also (§ 3), that 'the provisions of this act shall apply to any railroad bonds which have been heretofore issued, as well as to those which may hereafter be issued.'
Mr. JUSTICE SWAYNE, after stating the difference between the case and No. 80, and quoting this act, thus delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gelling v. Texas/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Frankfurter Douglas
United States Supreme Court
343 U.S. 960
Gelling v. Texas
The judgment is reversed. See Burstyn v. Wilson, 343 U.S. 495, 72 S.Ct. 777; and Winters v. New York, 333 U.S. 507, 68 S.Ct. 665, 92 L.Ed. 840.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gelpcke v. City of Dubuque

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Gelpcke v. City of Dubuque."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Gelpcke v. City of Dubuque (68 U.S. 175), ( 17 L.Ed. 520 ), ( 1 Wall. 175 )
* Gelpcke v. City of Dubuque (68 U.S. 220), ( 17 L.Ed. 530 ), ( 1 Wall. 220 )
# Gelpcke v. City of Dubuque (68 U.S. 220)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
68 U.S. 220
Gelpcke v. City of Dubuque (68 U.S. 220)
'In this act it is clearly implied that cities have authority to subscribe for railroad stock, and to issue their bonds in payment of it. What is implied in a statute is as much a part of it as what is expressed. (United States v. Babbitt, 1 Black, 61.) Considering the subject in the light of these acts, we entertain no doubt that the city possessed the power to issue these bonds.'
JUDGMENT REVERSED AND CASE REMANDED.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gems of Arabic Literature

The textbook reading primer for High School students in Calcutta, India.
GEMS OF ARABIC LITERATURE.
being the English translation of Ar-Rauzat-uz-Zakiah;
the text book for the higher standard examination in
Arabic, with notes and references, translated for the
first time from the original Arabic into English.
by Syed Hamood Hason, Headmaster, Government Anglo- Vernacular Schools, Crater, ADEN.
إن تجد عيباً فسد الخللا * جل من لا عيب فيه وعلا‎
( Right of translation and publication is reserved ).
1916.
Printed at the Diamond Jubilee Printing Press, Salapose Road
Ahmedabad by Devidas Chhaganlal, and published by the
translator Syed Hamood Hason at Crater Aden.
Price Rs. 9-0-0 in full cloth with gold lettering.
Price Rs.„ 7-0-0 in half cloth.
Dedicated.
with best wishes for their success,
To
English Students of Arabic
and
Oriental Students of English in the East and West.
by
Sayed Hamood Hason Master.
Preface.
The Translation into English of Ar-Rauzat-uz-Zakiah, the text book laid down for the Higher Standard Examination in Arabic was undertaken by me with the permission of the Government of India, and has been completed at the cost of much time and labour. It is published in the hope that it may prove useful to those who are desirous of studying the Arabic language and for those who are working with a view to passing the above examination.
It can be equally used however, in conjunction with the text book by Arabic-speaking students wishing to learn English as throughout it follows the text very closely.
In translating I have endeavoured to be neither too free nor too literal but have adopted a middle course.
Where necessary literal meanings and references in the footnotes have been given, as a further help to students. The words between brackets thus in the body of the translation are extraneous to the text and are inserted to elucidate the meaning of the passage.
Wherever possible, as for example in the description of Syria by Abil Fida, brackets have been used to show the English names of places; viz. Ariha (Jericho) etc.
The numbers in the margin indicate the pages of the Arabic text.
I regret the necessity for the list of errata. In spite of the careful reading of proofs several errors in spelling and printing have crept in. I have considered it advisable to include in this list even those mistakes which are obviously only clerical errors. In future editions, it is hoped to eliminate such errors.
The translator will be glad of any suggestions which may add to the attraction and usefulness of the present work.
Syed Hamood Hason.
CONTENTS.
Part I.
Part II.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Heresies of Sea Power/PREFACE

​This book is intentionally suggestive only. Though it seem to be all that its title can imply, it has not been produced with a view to casting doubt upon the labours of great men who have made a special study of Naval History, but only in order to suggest the possibility of some great principle underlying all Naval History, as capable of reinforcing theories of Sea Power as of destroying them.
I would only ask those whose first attitude towards the book may be that of hostile criticism to read it to the end before forming too definite an opinion as to the thesis advanced, assuring them that the final conclusion has not been arrived at without very careful thought, earnest study, and every effort to avoid the role of the mere iconoclast.
FRED. T. JANE.
# Herencia v. Felix Guzman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
219 U.S. 44
Herencia v. Felix Guzman
Argued: November 29, 1910. --- Decided: December 19, 1910
Mr. Willis Sweet for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Frederick L. Cornwell for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Guatimala or the United Provinces of Central America in 1827-8/22

ERRATA.
A considerable portion of the present Volume has been printed from manuscripts hastily thrown together, in consequence of which some errors have escaped observation.
The quotation from the Journal at Page 136 in which Louisiana and Georgia are referred to, was not intended for insertion. The reference to those states, the author is now aware was altogether erroneous. In the early part of the Volume, the mark denoting seconds (") has been fixed to those figures which represent minutes ('); these errors will not however be found to have occurred after page 184.
Page 229 for Dr. Rhy, read Dr. Rhys.