OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United Nations General Assembly Resolution 40

40. Voting Procedure in the Security Council
The General Assembly,
Mindful of the Purposes and Principles of the Charter of the United Nations, and having taken notice of the divergencies which have arisen in regard to the application and interpretation of Article 27 of the Charter:
    Earnestly requests the permanent members of the Security Council to make every effort, in consultation with one another and with fellow members of the Security Council, to ensure that the use of the special voting privilege of its permanent members does not impede the Security Council in reaching decisions promptly;
    Recommends to the Security Council the early adoption of practices and procedures, consistent with the Charter, to assist in reducing the difficulties in the application of Article 27 and to ensure the prompt and effective exercise by the Security Council of its functions; and
    Further recommends that, in developing such practices and procedures, the Security Council take into consideration the views expressed by Members of the United Nations during the second part of the first session of the General Assembly.
Sixty-first plenary meeting, 13 December 1946.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations General Assembly Resolution 35

35. Question of the Re-Examination by the Security Council of Certain Applications for Admission to Membership in the United Nations
Applications for membership in the United Nations were submitted by the People's Republic of Albania, the Mongolian People's Republic, the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan, Ireland and Portugal;
The Security Council, which examined these applications, has not made any recommendations;
Since membership in the United Nations is open to all peace-loving states which accept the obligations contained in the Charter and which in the judgement of the Organization are able and willing to carry out these obligations, as stated in Article 4;
Therefore, the General Assembly recommends that the Security Council re-examine the applications for membership in the United Nations of the above-mentioned States on their respective merits as measured by the yardstick of the Charter, in accordance with Article 4.
Forty-ninth plenary meeting, 19 November 1946.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations General Assembly Resolution 384

   RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED ON THE REPORTS OF THE FIRST COMMITTEE
   384 (V). Intervention of the Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China in Korea
The General Assembly,
Viewing with grave concern the situation in the Far East,
Anxious that immediate steps should be taken to prevent the conflict in Korea spreading to other areas and to put an end to the fighting in Korea itself, and that further steps should then be taken for a peaceful settlement of existing issues in accordance with the Purposes and Principles of the United Nations,
Requests the President of the General Assembly to constitute a group of three persons, including himself, to determine the basis on which a satisfactory cease-fire in Korea can be arranged and to make recommendations to the General Assembly as soon as possible.
324th plenary meeting,
14 December 1950.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3411

* related portals: United Nations General Assembly Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
3411 C. Policies of apartheid of the Government of South Africa - Special responsibility of the United Nations and the international community towards the oppressed people of South Africa.
A/RES/3411 C (XXX), 28 November 1975
The General Assembly,
Recalling its numerous resolutions condemning the policies of apartheid of the racist regime of South Africa,
Aware of its responsibility of upholding the principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
Commending the courageous struggle of the oppressed people of South Africa under the leadership of their liberation movements supported by the United Nations and the international community,
Taking note of the heavy sacrifices made by the people of South Africa in their legitimate struggle for self-determination,
Meeting on the occasion of the thirtieth anniversary of the United Nations,
1. Proclaims that the United Nations and the international community have a special responsibility towards the oppressed people of South Africa and their liberation movements, and towards those imprisoned, restricted or exiled for their struggle against apartheid;
2. Reiterates its determination to devote increasing attention and all necessary resources to concert international efforts, in close cooperation with the Organization of African Unity, for the speedy eradication of apartheid in South Africa and the liberation of the South African people.

## Footnotes

* United Nations documents on Apartheid
# United Nations General Assembly Resolution 36

36. Rules Governing the Admission of New Members to the United Nations
The General Assembly requests the Security Council to appoint a Committee to confer with a Committee on procedure of the General Assembly, with a view to preparing rules governing the admission of new Members which will be acceptable both to the General Assembly and to the Security Council.
Forty-ninth plenary meeting, 19 November 1946.
At its sixty-seventh plenary meeting, on 15 December 1946, the General Assembly appointed the following members to serve on its Committee on procedure:
    Australia, Cuba, India, Norway and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
At the same meeting, the General Assembly was informed that the Security Council had appointed to serve on its Committee on procedure the following countries:
    China, Brazil, and Poland.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations General Assembly Resolution 4

4 (I). Representation of Non-Governmental Bodies on the Economic and Social Council
In connection with the requests of the World Federation of Trade Unions, the American Federation of Labour, the International Cooperative Alliance, and other non-governmental organizations, that their representatives shall be allowed to take part in the work of the Economic and Social Council, and in accordance with Article 71 of the Charter providing for the carrying out by the Economic and Social Council of appropriate consultations with non-governmental organizations,
The General Assembly recommends:
    (a) that the Economic and Social Council should, as soon as possible, adopt suitable arrangements enabling the World Federation of Trade Unions and the International Cooperative Alliance as well as other international non-governmental organizations whose experience the Economic and Social Council will find necessary to use, to collaborate for purposes of consultation with the Economic and Social Council;
    (b) that the Economic and Social Council should likewise adopt as soon as possible suitable arrangements enabling the American Federation of Labour as well as other national and regional non-governmental organizations whose experience the Economic and Social Council will find necessary to use, to collaborate for purposes of consultation with the Economic and Social Council.
Thirty-third plenary meeting, 14 February 1946.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Trupiano v. United States

United States Supreme Court
334 U.S. 699
Trupiano v. United States
Argued: March 9, 1948. --- Decided: June 14, 1948
Mr. Frank G. Schlosser, of Hoboken, N.J., for petitioners.
Mr. Philip B. Perlman, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Trump v. Anderson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, quotes, news, textbook, course, Wikidata item.
* Opinion of the Court
* Barrett, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment
* Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson, JJ., concurring in the judgment
| | The current edition of this document derives from the electronic version of the "slip opinion" posted online by the Supreme Court of the United States the day the decision was handed down. It is not the final or most authoritative version. It is subject to further revision by the Court and should be replaced with the final edition when it is published in a print volume of the United States Reports. The Court's full disclaimer regarding slip opinions follows: |
| The "slip" opinion is the second version of an opinion. It is sent to the printer later in the day on which the "bench" opinion is released by the Court. Each slip opinion has the same elements as the bench opinion—majority or plurality opinion, concurrences or dissents, and a prefatory syllabus—but may contain corrections not appearing in the bench opinion. Caution: These electronic opinions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official printed slip opinion pamphlets. Moreover, a slip opinion is replaced within a few months by a paginated version of the case in the preliminary print, and—one year after the issuance of that print—by the final version of the case in a U. S. Reports bound volume. In case of discrepancies between the print and electronic versions of a slip opinion, the print version controls. In case of discrepancies between the slip opinion and any later official version of the opinion, the later version controls. (source: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinions.aspx) ||
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Truskett v. Closser

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
236 U.S. 223
Truskett v. Closser
Argued: January 28, 1915. --- Decided: February 23, 1915
Messrs. James A. Veasey and Lloyd A. Rowland for appellants.
Messrs. G. T. Stanford, Eugene Mackey, T. H. Stanford, and John H. Brennan for appellee.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Trump v. Anderson/Opinion of Justice Barrett

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. No. 23–719
DONALD J. TRUMP, PETITIONER v. NORMA ANDERSON, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO [March 4, 2024]
Justice Barrett, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.
I join Parts I and II–B of the Court’s opinion. I agree that States lack the power to enforce Section 3 against Presidential candidates. That principle is sufficient to resolve this case, and I would decide no more than that. This suit was brought by Colorado voters under state law in state court. It does not require us to address the complicated question whether federal legislation is the exclusive vehicle through which Section 3 can be enforced.
The majority’s choice of a different path leaves the remaining Justices with a choice of how to respond. In my judgment, this is not the time to amplify disagreement with stridency. The Court has settled a politically charged issue in the volatile season of a Presidential election. Particularly in this circumstance, writings on the Court should turn the national temperature down, not up. For present purposes, our differences are far less important than our unanimity: All nine Justices agree on the outcome of this case. That is the message Americans should take home.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Henry, John Patrick

MacEnri, Seaghan Padraic
​HENRY, John Patrick (Seaghán P. MacEnri), M.A., M.D.. B.Ch. (T.C.D.); b. 1862; son of Peter Henry, of Co. Sligo. Educ. at Trinity College, Dublin, and St. Vincent's Hospital; ophthalmic and aural surgeon; Irish linguistic scholar; Prof, of Ophthalmology and Otology, and Lecturer on Modern Irish at University College, Galway, and member of its Governing Body; Principal of Connacht Irish College, Spiddal. Ex-Principal of Leinster College of Irish, Dublin. Author of (in Irish prose) Udhacht an Stiocaire and Bas Gofradlia Ui Dhomhnaill; and of a number of popular manuals for Irish Students and teachers, including A Handbook of Modern Irish (in four parts); b. 1862; m. 1917, Miss Jane Louisa Little, of Galway, and has issue two daus.. Res.: Crescent House, Galway.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Heighington, Lt.-Col. William

​HEIGHINGTON, Lt.-Col. William, Hon. Lieut.-Col. late Wicklow Art. Mil.; J.P., Co. Wicklow; son of late Wm. Heighington, M.D., J.P., of Donard House, Co. Wicklow; b. 1851; m. 1891, Sara, eldest dau. of late Robt. Cooper, of Collinstown, Co. Kildare. Res.: Donard House, Donard, Co. Wicklow.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Hemphill, Rev. Samuel

​HEMPHILL, Rev. Samuel, D.D., Litt.D. (T.C.D.), Rector of Drumbeg near Belfast, 1920: Examining Chaplain to Archbishop of Dublin, 1915. Educ.: Clonmel; Tipperary; Dublin University. Professor of Biblical Greek, Dublin University, 1888-98; Select preacher in Dublin University, 1892-93, 1899; Canon of St. Patrick's Cathedral, Dublin, 1909-14; Chancellor of Christchurch Cathedral, Dublin, 1919-20; Member of the Royal Irish Academy. 1893. Pubns.: The Diatessaron of Tatian, 1888; My Neighbour 1897: The Satires of Persius translated, 1900; A History of the Revised Version of the New Testament, 1906; b. Clonmel, 5th July 1859; son of late Robt. Hemphill, Springhill, Co. Tipperary; m. Flora Murcaret, dau. of Rev. Alexander Delap, Rector of Valencia, Co. Kerry, 1885; has issue three sons, four daus. Res.: Drumbeg Rectory, Dunmurry, Co. Antrim.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Hennessy, Richard Martin

​HENNESSY, Richard Martin, Kings Counsel; called to the Irish Bar; m. 1877; b. 1854: King's Counsel, 1901; Bencher of King's Inns, 1912. Res.: 16 Hume Street, Dublin; Ballindeasig, Co, Cork.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Hennessy, Rt. Rev. John Joseph

​HENNESSY, Rt. Rev. John Joseph; b. near Cloyne, Co. Cork, July 19th 1847; son of Michael Hennessey and Ellen Cronin; came to U.S. in childhood; Grad.: Christian Brothers' College, St. Louis, 1862; completed theol. course at Salesianum, Milwaukee; philos. course at Cape Girardeau Coll., Mo.; ordained priest (by Papal dispensation, being under canonical age), 1869; Missionary in 10 counties in Iron Mountain dist. of Mo., 1869-80; founded the Railroad Men's Benevolent Union, 1871; established, 1877, Ursuline Convent at Arcadia, Mo.; built chs. in Bismarck, Graniteville, Poplar Bluff, Doniphan and Gatewood, Mo.; procurator and v.-p. bd. mgrs., St. Louis Protectory, 1878-86: editor St. Louis Youth's Magazine, 1880-6; rector Sr. John's, St. Louis, 1880-8; consecrated Bishop of Wichita, Nov. 30th, 1888. Res.: Wichita, Kansas, U.S.A.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Henry, Augustine

​HENRY, Augustine, M.A. (Queen's University, Ireland, and Cambridge University), F.L.S., M.R.I.A., F.R.H.S., V.M.H. Member of the Royal Arboricultural Societies of England and Scotland; of the Dendrological Society of France; of the Franche-Comté Forestry Society, and of the Irish Forestry Society. Professor of Forestry, Royal College of Science, Dublin, since 1913; m. 1908, Alice Helen, eldest dau. of Sir Lauder Brunton, 1st Bart. Educ.: Queen's Colleges, Galway and Belfast. Official in Chinese Imperial Maritime Customs, 1882-1900. Explorer of the flora of the interior of China, Formosa and Hainan; introduced Lilium Henryi and other Chinese plants; and for these services to Science was elected Corresponding Member of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh (1891). of the Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (1892) and of the Czecho-Slovakian Botanical Society (1921): and was awarded the Veitch Memorial Medal of the Royal Horticultural Society (1902). Studied forestry at Nancy, France: travelled in forests of North America, Algeria, Corsica, Italy, Balkan States, Denmark, Scandinavia, Poland, Bohemia, Silesia, Slovakia, Spain, France, etc. Reader in Forestry, University of Cambridge, 1907-13, during which period the School of Forestry at Cambridge was founded and experiments in breeding new trees were commenced. Publications: Trees of Great Britain and Ireland, in conjunction with H. J. Elwes, F.R.S.; Forests, Woods and Trees in Relation to Hygiene: Notes on Chinese Economic Botany: List of Plants from Formosa; papers in Kew Bulletin, Gardeners' Chronicle, Proceedings Royal Irish Academy, Journal Anthropological Institute, and other scientific periodicals. Res.: 5 Sandford Terrace, Ranelagh, Dublin; Royal College of Science, Dublin.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Hemphill, Baron

Fitzroy Hemphill
​HEMPHILL, Baron (Unit. Kgd., 1905). Fitzroy Hemphill, 3rd Baron; Barrister. Mid. temple, 1899; late Capt. 2nd Batt. K.O.S.B.; a J.P. for Co. Galway; Deputy Chairman L.C.C.. 1907-08; only surviving son of Charles Hare, 1st Baron, B.C., K.C., and Augusta (d. 1890), dau. of late Hon. Sir Francis C. Stanhope, and grand-dau. of Charles, 3rd Earl of Harrington; b. 21st Nov., 1860; s. his brother, 26th March, 1918; m. 27th Feb., 1897, Mary, only child of Andrew Martyn, J.P., of Spiddal, Co. Galway, and has issue one son. Res.: 44 Fitzwiliiam Place, Dublin; 137 Victoria Street, London, S.W.1.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Henderson, Sir Trevor

​HENDERSON. Sir Trevor, K.B.E., cr. 1921; Chairman and Managing Director, "Belfast Newsletter"; b. 29th July, 1882: eldest surviving son of late James Alexander Henderson, of Norwood Tower, Strandtown, Belfast, and great-grandson of late Alexander Mackay, Mountcolyer Park, Belfast, who acquired the "Newsletter" by purchase in 1894. Educ.: Royal Academical Institution; entered "Newsletter," 1881. Res.: Norwood Tower, Belfast. Club: Union, Belfast.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Hennessy, Major George Richard James

​HENNESSY, Major George Richard James, O.B.E. (1919),; D.L., J.P., Co. Louth; second son of late Richd. Hennessy, of Cognac, France; b. 1877; m. 1898, Ethel Mary, dau. of late C. Ross, late Scots Greys. Res.: St. Margaret's, Dundalk.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Hennessy, Michael Joseph

​HENNESSY, Michael Joseph (M.P. for East and North East Cork from 1922).
# Udall v. Steam-Ship Ohio

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
58 U.S. 17
Udall v. Steam-Ship Ohio
THIS was an appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the southern district of New York.
It was a libel filed in the district court, for furnishing articles for the steam-ship Ohio.
A motion was made by Mr. Cutting, and opposed by Mr. Bradley, with whom was Mr. Benedict, to dismiss the appeal, for the want of jurisdiction.
The points made were the same as those in the succeding case, and there was an affidavit of value made by Mr. Benedict. The affidavit also set forth 'that the rules of the district court required libels to be sworn to, so that it is necessary, in stating the amount claimed, to state the same as it actually and in truth exists at the time the libel is sworn to, and on such libels the court, in its final decree, gives such amount as the libellant shall be entitled to recover on his case, whether the same be more or less than the amount in the libel.'
The amount of the claim and the history of the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Justice McLEAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Udell v. Davidson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
48 U.S. 769
Udell v. Davidson
THIS case was brought up from the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois, by a writ of error issued under the twenty-fifth section of the Judiciary Act.
The facts in the case are sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the court.
A motion to dismiss it, for want of jurisdiction, was made by Mr. J. Mason Campbell, which motion was sustained by him, and opposed by Mr. Coxe.
Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ubi Sunt Qui Ante Nos?

"How now are the Others faring? Where sit They all in state?"
* Edmund Clarence Stedman (1897), "Ubi Sunt Qui Ante Nos?" in Poems, now first collected.
* Edmund Clarence Stedman (1908), "Ubi Sunt Qui Ante Nos?" in The poems of Edmund Clarence Stedman.