OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Public Law 110-200

Note: This is the original legislation as it was initially enacted. Any subsequent amendments hosted on Wikisource may be listed using What Links Here.
An Act To amend Public Law 110-196 to provide for a temporary extension of programs authorized by the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 beyond April 18, 2008.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

### SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AGRICULTURAL PROGRAMS AND SUSPENSION OF PERMANENT PRICE SUPPORT AUTHORITIES.

    Effective as of April 18, 2008, section 1 of Public Law 110-196 (122 Stat. 653) is amended.—
       (1) in subsection (a), by striking "the Secretary of Agriculture shall carry out the authorities, until April 18, 2008" and inserting "the authorities shall be carried out, until April 25, 2008"; and
       (2) in subsection (d), by striking "April 18, 2008" and inserting "April 25, 2008".
Approved April 18, 2008.

## Legislative History

H.R. 5813
* CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
** Apr. 16, considered and passed House.
** Apr. 17, considered and passed Senate.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Public Law 110-205

Note: This is the original legislation as it was initially enacted. Any subsequent amendments hosted on Wikisource may be listed using What Links Here.
An Act To amend Public Law 110-196 to provide for a temporary extension of programs authorized by the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 beyond April 25, 2008.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

### SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AGRICULTURAL PROGRAMS AND SUSPENSION OF PERMANENT PRICE SUPPORT AUTHORITIES.

    Effective April 25, 2008, section 1 of Public Law 110-196 (122 Stat. 653) (as amended by Public Law 110-200 (122 Stat. 695)) is amended.—
       (1) in subsection (a), by striking "April 25, 2008" and inserting "May 2, 2008"; and
       (2) in subsection (d), by striking "April 25, 2008" and inserting "May 2, 2008".
Approved April 25, 2008.

## Legislative History

S. 2903
* CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
** Apr. 24, considered and passed House and Senate.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Public Law 110-20

Note: This is the original legislation as it was initially enacted. Any subsequent amendments hosted on Wikisource may be listed using What Links Here.
An Act To redesignate the Federal building located at 167 North Main Street in Memphis, Tennessee, as the `Clifford Davis and Odell Horton Federal Building’.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

### SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 167 North Main Street in Memphis, Tennessee, commonly known as the Clifford Davis Federal Building, shall be known and designated as the `Clifford Davis and Odell Horton Federal Building’.

### SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in Section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the `Clifford Davis and Odell Horton Federal Building’.
Approved May 2, 2007.

## Legislative History

H.R. 753 (S. 835):
* HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110-072 accompanying H.R. 753 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
* CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
** Mar. 26, considered and passed House.
** Apr. 10, considered and passed Senate.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Public Law 110-208

Note: This is the original legislation as it was initially enacted. Any subsequent amendments hosted on Wikisource may be listed using What Links Here.
An Act To amend Public Law 110-196 to provide for a temporary extension of programs authorized by the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 beyond May 2, 2008.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

### SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AGRICULTURAL PROGRAMS AND SUSPENSION OF PERMANENT PRICE SUPPORT AUTHORITIES.

    Effective April 25, 2008, section 1 of Public Law 110-196 (122 Stat. 653) (as amended by Public Law 110-200 (122 Stat. 695) and Public Law 110-205 (122 Stat. 713)) is amended.—
       (1) in subsection (a), by striking "May 2, 2008" and inserting "May 16, 2008"; and
       (2) in subsection (d), by striking "May 2, 2008" and inserting "May 16, 2008".
Approved May 2, 2008.

## Legislative History

S. 2954
* CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
** May 1, considered and passed House and Senate.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Royal Naval Biography/Maitland, Anthony

Layout 2
HON. ANTHONY MAITLAND. A Companion of the Most Honorable Military Order of the Bath, and M.P. for the County of Berwick. [Post-Captain of 1806.]
Second son of James Earl of Lauderdale, K.T. by Eleanor, only daughter of Anthony Todd, Esq. and nephew to the late Lieutenant-General the Right Hon. Sir Thomas Maitland, G.C.B. Governor of Malta, &c. &c. This officer was born June 10, 1785; and we first find him serving as a Midshipman on board the Medusa frigate, bearing the flag of Lord Nelson, by whom he is said to have “particularly distinguished himself” at the attack of the Boulogne flotilla, in Aug. 1801; on which occasion he was severely wounded. His commission as a Lieutenant bears date Feb. 2, 1805; he obtained the rank of Commander May 6, 1806; and was made a Post-Captain Sept. 25, in the same year.
Captain Maitland’s first appointment was to the Arrogant, an old worn out 74, stationed at Bombay as a guard-ship and sheer-hulk, the command of which he assumed early in 1807. During the latter part of the war he commanded the Pique frigate, on the West India station, and there captured the Hawk, American privateer of 5 guns and 68 men. In 1816, he was appointed to the Glasgow 50, which ship formed part of Lord Exmouth’s squadron at Algiers, and sustained considerable damage on that glorious occasion. Her loss consisted of 10 killed and 37 wounded.
Captain Maitland was nominated a C.B. Sept. 21, 1816; and re-appointed to the Glasgow Aug. 21, 1817. He returned home from the Mediterranean station, and paid off his fine frigate, in Mar. 1821.
# Royal Naval Biography/Maling, Thomas James

Layout 2
THOMAS JAMES MALING, Esq [Post-Captain of 1800.]
This officer, a son of the late Mr. Maling, of West Hennington, co. Durham, was made a Commander Dec. 24, 1798; and obtained post rank Sept. 6, 1800. During the late war, he commanded the Diana and Undaunted frigates, and Mulgrave of 74 guns; and among other vessels captured la Charlotte, a French ship privateer of 14 guns, pierced for 20, with a complement of 118 men; and the San Josephe of 14 guns and 96 men.
In 1817, a Chapel capable of containing about 500 persons, and built at Captain Maling’s expense, near Hylton Ferry, in the county of Durham, was opened for divine service by the Rector of Bishopswearmouth.
Captain Maling was appointed to the Northumberland of ​78 guns, lying in the Medway, July 31, 1821; and at present commands the Cambridge 82, on the South American station. He married, Dec. 2, 1811, Harriet, youngest daughter of the late celebrated Dr. Darwin, of the Priory, near Derby.
One of Captain Maling’s sisters is the lady of Earl Mulgrave; another was married to Lieutenant-Colonel Jackson, of the Guards, and died at Lisbon in 1813; a third to Colonel Walsh, formerly a Commissioner of the Victualling Board; and a fourth to Robert Ward, Esq., M.P. for Haslemere, and Clerk of the Ordnance.
# Royal Naval Biography/Mainwaring, Thomas Francis Charles

Layout 2
THOMAS FRANCIS CHARLES MAINWARING, Esq. [Post-Captain of 1810.]
This officer was made a Lieutenant by Sir Roger Curtis, at the Cape of Good Hope, in 1800; from which period we find him successively serving under Captains William Hotham, Lord Mark Kerr, and Thomas Dundas; in the Adamant 50, Fisgard 38, and Naiad of similar force; on the Cape, Channel, and Mediterranean stations. In the latter frigate he witnessed the defeat of the combined fleets off Cape Trafalgar; and afterwards assisted in rescuing one of our dismasted ships from destruction. His commission as a Commander bears date Jan. 31, 1806.
Captain Mainwaring’s first appointment was, to the Tartarus sloop, fitted as a fire-ship; and in Aug. 1807, he appears to have been charged with the landing of the troops under Sir Arthur Wellesley (now Duke of Wellington) in Wibeck bay, preparatory to the investment of the Danish capital.
Early in 1808, Captain Mainwaring was appointed pro tempore, to the Vanguard 74, which ship was the first of her class that ever wintered in the Baltic. He retained the command of her until June following, and then rejoined the Tartarus.
​In 1810, we find that sloop sinking two French privateers, off Pillau; after which Captain Mainwaring conveyed Gustavus, the ex-King of Sweden, from Riga to England, under circumstances particularly difficult and singular; for which service he was promoted to post-rank, Nov. 27, in the same year. During the last two years of the war, he commanded the Royal George a first rate, on the Mediterranean station.
# Royal Naval Biography/Manderson, James

Layout 2
JAMES MANDERSON, Esq. [Commander.]
Author of “A Letter addressed to the Prime Minister, and First Lord of the Admiralty, on the Extension of the Naval Establishments of the Country.” “An Examination into the true Cause of the Stream running through the Gulf of Florida.” And “Twelve Letters addressed to the Right Hon. Spencer Perceval; on the Magnitude of the British Navy, the Importance of Falmouth Harbour, &c. &c.” This officer was made a lieutenant in 1795; after which he appears to have been principally employed in receiving and prison ships. He obtained his present rank on the 22d Jan. 1806.
# Royal Naval Biography/Maitland, Thomas

Layout 2
THOMAS MAITLAND, Esq. A Deputy Lieutenant of Berwickshire. [Commander.]
This officer entered the naval service in 1816; obtained his first commission on the 16th May, 1823; and was promoted ​to his present rank while serving under the flag of Sir Robert Waller Otway, In the Ganges 84, on the South American station, April 30th, 1827. He was appointed to the Sparrowhawk sloop, on the West India station, June 14th, 1832; and paid off at Portsmouth, May 7th, 1833. The Sparrowhawk brought home 589,405 Mexican dollars, and 42 bales of cochineal. On the day after her arrival at Spithead, two of her crew were killed and three others wounded, by the accidental discharge of a gun which had just before missed fire during exercise.
Connnander Maitland married, Feb. 7th, 1828, at Rio Janeiro, Amelia, daughter of William Young, Esq.
# Reed v. Steamship Yaka

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
373 U.S. 410
Reed v. Steamship Yaka
Argued: April 22, 1963. --- Decided: May 27, 1963
Abraham E. Freedman, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.
T. E. Byrne, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., for respondents.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Reedy v. Scott

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
90 U.S. 352
Reedy v. Scott

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Reed v. Reed

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971), was an Equal Protection case in the United States in which the Supreme Court ruled that the administrators of estates cannot be named in a way that discriminates between sexes.
Supreme Court of the United States
404 U.S. 71
Reed v. Reed
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Idaho
No. 70-4 Argued: October 19, 1971 --- Decided: November 22, 1971
A mandatory provision of the Idaho probate code that gives preference to men over women when persons of the same entitlement class apply for appointment as administrator of a decedent's estate is based solely on a discrimination prohibited by and therefore violative of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
93 Idaho 511, 465 P. 2d 635, reversed and remanded.
BURGER, C.J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Allen R. Derr argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Melvin L. Wulf, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Pauli Murray, and Dorothy Kenyon.
Charles S. Stout argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief was Myron E. Anderson.
Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed by J. Lee Rankin and Norman Redlich for the City of New York; by Martha W. Griffiths, Phineas Indritz, Leo Kanowitz, Marguerite Rawalt, Sylvia Roberts, and Faith Seidenberg for American Veterans Committee, Inc., et al.; and by Birch Bayh for the National Federation of Business and Professional Women's Clubs, Inc.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Reed v. State

Reed v. State, 317 Ark. 286 (1994), is a per curiam decision of the Arkansas Supreme Court.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
317 Ark. 286
Ronnie Reed v. State of Arkansas
Pro Se Motion for Access to Transcript
No. CR 94-375. --- Delivered: June 6, 1994.
* Court Documents
* Per Curiam Decision
* CRIMINAL PROCEDURE—ALL GROUNDS FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF, INCLUDING CLAIMS THAT A SENTENCE WAS ILLEGALLY IMPOSED, MUST BE RAISED UNDER RULE 37—ANY CONFLICTS WITH STATUTES ARE RESOLVED IN FAVOR OF THE RULES.—Criminal Procedure Rule 37.2(b) provides in pertinent part that all grounds for post-conviction relief, including claims that a sentence is illegal or illegally imposed, must be raised in a petition under Rule 37; statutes are given deference only to the extent that they are compatible with our rules, and conflicts which compromise these rules are resolved with the rules remaining supreme.
* CRIMINAL PROCEDURE—STATUTE CONCERNING SENTENCES ILLEGALLY IMPOSED CONFLICTED WITH RULE—PETITIONS TO CORRECT SENTENCE NOT TIMELY, APPELLANT NOT ENTITLED TO RELIEF.—Where the appellant did not file his petitions to correct the sentence imposed on him within the time limit set by Rule 37, the petitions were untimely and he was not entitled to relief in circuit court; Arkansas Code Annotated § 16-90-111 (Supp. 1991) is in conflict with Criminal Procedure Rule 37 which in part provides that a petition under the rule is untimely if not filed within sixty days of issuance of the appellate court's mandate affirming the judgment of conviction; the time limitations imposed in Rule 37 are jurisdictional in nature, and the circuit court may not grant relief on a untimely petition.
Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court; John Langston, Judge; Pro Se Motion for Access to Transcript denied and appeal dismissed.
Appellant, pro se.
No response.
[PER CURIAM decision of the court.]
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Reed v. State/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Decision per curiam
​PER CURIAM. In 1991 appellant Ronnie Reed was found guilty by a jury of delivery of a controlled substance and sentenced to 100 years imprisonment. We affirmed. Reed v. State, 312 Ark. 82, 847 S.W.2d 34 (1993). Appellant subsequently filed in the trial court a pro se petition pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 37. An order was entered denying the petition. An appeal of the order was not perfected.
In September and November 1993, appellant filed pro se petitions to correct the sentence imposed pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-90-111 (Supp. 1991). The petitions were denied, and the record has been lodged in this court on appeal. Appellant now seeks access to the transcript.
​[1] The motion is denied and the appeal dismissed as it is clear that the appellant could not prevail on appeal. This court has consistently held that an appeal of the denial of post-conviction relief will be dismissed where it is clear that the appeal is wholly without merit. Chambers v. State, 304 Ark. 663, 803 S.W.2d 932 (1991); Johnson v. State, 303 Ark. 560, 798 S.W.2d 108 (1990); Williams v. State, 293 Ark. 73, 732 S.W.2d 456 (1987).
[2] The petitions to correct sentence were untimely. Criminal Procedure Rule 37.2(b) provides in pertinent part that all grounds for post-conviction relief, including claims that a sentence is illegal or illegally imposed, must be raised in a petition under Rule 37. Statutes are given deference only to the extent that they are compatible with our rules, and conflicts which compromise these rules are resolved with our rules remaining supreme. Hickson v. State, 316 Ark. 783, 875 S.W.2d 492 (1994).
[3] Arkansas Code Annotated § 16-90-111 (Supp. 1991) which permits the trial court to correct a sentence imposed in an illegal manner within 120 days after receipt of the affirming mandate of the appellate court and which permits an illegal sentence to be corrected at any time is in conflict with Criminal Procedure Rule 37. Criminal Procedure Rule 37.2(c) provides that a petition under the rule is untimely if not filed within sixty days of issuance of the appellate court's mandate affirming the judgment of conviction. The time limitations imposed in Rule 37 are jurisdictional in nature, and the circuit court may not grant relief on a untimely petition. Maxwell v. State, 298 Ark. 329, 767 S.W.2d 303 (1989). As appellant did not file his petitions to correct the sentence imposed on him within the time limit set by Rule 37, the petitions were untimely and he was not entitled to relief in circuit court.
Motion denied and appeal dismissed.
# Royal Naval Biography/Fanshawe, Arthur

Layout 2
ARTHUR FANSHAWE, Esq. [Post-Captain of 1816.]
Youngest son of the late Commissioner Fanshawe, whose services we have recorded at p. 49 et seq. of Vol. II. Part I.
​This officer was made lieutenant, April 22, 1813; commander, Oct. 2, 1815; and posted, while acting as captain of the Meander frigate, Oct. 17, 1816. He married, Aug. 10, 1820, Margaret, third daughter of the late Hon. Sir John Wilson, one of the Judges of H.M. Court of Common Pleas, and daughter-in-law of Rear-Admiral Griffith, now Colpoys, whose flag-ship, the Newcastle 60, he then commanded on the Halifax station. He was put out of commission January 16, 1822, since which period he has not been employed.
Agent.– John Chippendale, Esq.