OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Army Field Manual 7-93 Long-Range Surveillance Unit Operations/Appendix A

APPENDIX A - PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION
The LRSU mission is a demanding one. Essentially, the LRSU mission is nonconventional while working in a conventional environment. Due to the complexity of the mission and the demands on the soldiers, recruitment and selection of potential LRSU soldiers is one of the unit commander's most important duties. He must select soldiers who are mature, physically fit, mentally strong and can work closely within a small group, but also can think and act independently. This appendix provides guidance to corps and division staffs and commanders in recruiting and selecting prospective LRSU soldiers.

## A-1. CORPS AND DIVISION G1

LRSU commanders need the cooperation of the G1 in allowing prospective unit soldiers to be attached for 30 to 60 days. During this time, the LRSU evaluates the soldier. At the end of this time, the G1 issues assignment orders to the LRSU or assigns the soldier to another unit. The commander and G1 agree on the standards. The LRSU commander must justify why the soldier failed to meet the standards.

## A-2. COMMANDERS

The LRSU designs a recruitment and selection program that satisfies the personnel needs of the unit. It is approved by the battalion commander in cooperation with the G1.
a. In recruiting prospective LRSU soldiers, the following screening standards are desirable:
* Airborne qualified (specialist four or corporal and below).
* Airborne and ranger qualified (sergeant and above).
* GT score of 110 or above.
* Must agree to volunteer for airborne and ranger schools (if applicable).
* Meet US Army height and weight or body fat standards.
* No prior disciplinary problems.
* No history of drug or alcohol abuse.
* Graduate One-Station Unit Training without waivers.
* Have at least two years of retainability in the unit.
b. While a prospective soldier is attached to the LRSU, he should meet the following minimum standards:
* Pass the Army Physical Fitness Test (ranger school standards).
* Pass the Combat Water Survival Test.
* Complete a 5-mile run within 40 minutes.
* Complete a 12-mile road march while carrying 35 pounds within 3 hours.
* Pass a written land navigation test.
* Complete a day and night land navigation practical exercise.
* Demonstrate proficiency in basic LRSU team skills (operation of HF radios, burst devices, and construction of antennas; basic vehicle identification; as a team member conducting operations).
* Pass a comprehensive examination by the unit selection review board.
# United States Army Field Manual 3-13 Information Operations

FM 3-13 (FM 100-6)
Information Operations: Doctrine, Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures
NOVEMBER 2003
DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release: distribution is unlimited.
HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Information Operations: Doctrine, Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures
Contents
| PREFACE | | II |
| INTRODUCTION | | V |
| PART ONE | INFORMATION OPERATIONS DOCTRINE |
| Chapter 1 | DESIGN OF ARMY INFORMATION OPERATIONS | 1-1 |
| Chapter 2 | INFORMATION OPERATIONS ELEMENTS AND RELATED ACTIVITIES | 2-1 |
| Chapter 3 | OPERATIONS SECURITY | 3-1 |
| Chapter 4 | MILITARY DECEPTION | 4-1 |
| PART TWO | TACTICS, TECHNIQUES, AND PROCEDURES |
| Chapter 5 | PLANNING INFORMATION OPERATIONS | 5-1 |
| Chapter 6 | PREPARING FOR INFORMATION OPERATIONS | 6-1 |
| Chapter 7 | EXECUTING INFORMATION OPERATIONS | 7-1 |
| Appendix A | QUICK REFERENCE TO IO INPUT TO THE MDMP | A-1 |
| Appendix B | INFORMATION OPERATIONS SCENARIO | B-1 |
| Appendix C | INFORMATION OPERATIONS ESTIMATE | C-1 |
| Appendix D | INFORMATION OPERATIONS ANNEX | D-1 |
| Appendix E | INFORMATION OPERATIONS TARGETING | E-1 |
| Appendix F | STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES AND SUPPORTING CAPABILITIES | F-1 |
| Appendix G | EXAMPLE OF IO-FOCUSED FRAGMENTARY ORDER | G-1 |
| GLOSSARY | | Glossary-1 |
| BIBLIOGRAPHY | | Bibliography-1 |
| INDEX | | Index-1 |
| DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. |||
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 203

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 1208th meeting, unanimously, on 14 May 1965
The Security Council,
Deeply concerned at the grave events in the Dominican Republic,
1. Calls for a strict cease-fire;
2. Invites the Secretary-General to send, as an urgent measure, a representative to the Dominican Republic for the purpose of reporting to the Security councils on the present situation;
3. Calls upon all concerned in the Dominican Republic to co-operate with the representative of the Secretary-General in the carrying out of this task.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 2007

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
​Resolution 2007 (2011)
Adopted by the Security Council at its 6613th meeting, on 14 September 2011
The Security Council,
Recalling its resolution 1786 (2007) adopted on 28 November 2007,
Having regard to Article 16 of the Statute of the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia,
Having considered the nomination by the Secretary-General to reappoint Mr. Serge Brammertz as Prosecutor of the International Tribunal (S/2011/566),
Recalling that resolution 1966 (2010) of 22 December 2010 called upon the International Tribunal to take all possible measures to expeditiously complete all its remaining work as provided for by that resolution no later than 31 December 2014,
Decides to reappoint Mr. Serge Brammertz as Prosecutor of the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 16, paragraph 4, of the Statute of the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia related to the length of office of the Prosecutor, for a term with effect from 1 January 2012 until 31 December 2014, which is subject to an earlier termination by the Security Council upon the completion of the work of the International Tribunal.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 2006

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
​Resolution 2006 (2011)
Adopted by the Security Council at its 6612th meeting, on 14 September 2011
The Security Council,
Recalling its resolution 1774 (2007) adopted on 14 September 2007,
Having regard to Article 15 of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda,
Having considered the nomination by the Secretary-General to reappoint Mr. Hassan Bubacar Jallow as Prosecutor of the International Tribunal (S/2011/561),
Recalling that resolution 1966 (2010) of 22 December 2010 called upon the International Tribunal to take all possible measures to expeditiously complete all its remaining work as provided for by that resolution no later than 31 December 2014,
Decides to reappoint Mr. Hassan Bubacar Jallow as Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 4, of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda related to the length of office of the Prosecutor, for a term with effect from 15 September 2011 until 31 December 2014, which is subject to an earlier termination by the Security Council upon the completion of the work of the International Tribunal.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 20

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted unanimously by the Security Council at its 117th meeting, on 10 March 1947
The Security Council,
Having received and considered the first report of the Atomic Energy Commission, [1] dated 31 December 1946 together with the letter of transmittal [2] of the same date,
1. Recognizes that any agreement expressed by the members of the Council to the separate portions of the report is preliminary, since final acceptance of any part by any nation is conditioned upon its acceptance of all parts of the control plan in its final form;
2. Transmits the record of its consideration of the first report of the Atomic Energy Commission to the Commission;
3. Urges the Atomic Energy Commission, in accordance with General Assembly resolutions 1 (I) of 24 January 1946 and 41 (I) of 14 December 1946, to continue its inquiry into all phases of the problem of the international control of atomic energy and to develop as promptly as possible the specific proposals called for by section 5 General Assembly resolution 1 (I) and by General Assembly resolution 41 (I), and in due course to prepare and submit to the Security Council a draft treaty or treaties or convention or conventions incorporating its ultimate proposals;
4. Requests the Atomic Energy Commission to submit a second report to the Security Council before the next session of the General Assembly.
[1] Official Records of the Atomic Energy Commission, First Year, Special Supplement.
[2] Official Records of the Security Council, Second Year, Supplement No. 5, annex 14.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 200

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 1190th meeting, unanimously, on 15 March 1965
The Security Council,
Having examined the application of the Gambia for admission to the United Nations,
Recommends to the General Assembly that the Gambia be admitted to membership in the United Nations.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Code/Title 17/Chapter 6

From the U.S. Copyright Office.
* Section 601. Manufacture, importation, and public distribution of certain copies
* Section 602. Infringing importation of copies or phonorecords
* Section 603. Importation prohibitions: Enforcement and disposition of excluded articles
# United States Code/Title 17/Chapter 5/Sections 502 and 503

From the U.S. Copyright Office. Added by section 101 of title I of the Copyright Act of 1976 (Pub. L. 94-553, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2541), with effect from January 1, 1978.
§ 502—Remedies for infringement: Injunctions
(a) Any court having jurisdiction of a civil action arising under this title may, subject to the provisions of section 1498 of title 28, grant temporary and final injunctions on such terms as it may deem reasonable to prevent or restrain infringement of a copyright.
(b) Any such injunction may be served anywhere in the United States on the person enjoined; it shall be operative throughout the United States and shall be enforceable, by proceedings in contempt or otherwise, by any United States court having jurisdiction of that person. The clerk of the court granting the injunction shall, when requested by any other court in which enforcement of the injunction is sought, transmit promptly to the other court a certified copy of all the papers in the case on file in such clerk's office.
§ 503—Remedies for infringement: Impounding and disposition of infringing articles
(a) At any time while an action under this title is pending, the court may order the impounding, on such terms as it may deem reasonable, of all copies or phonorecords claimed to have been made or used in violation of the copyright owner's exclusive rights, and of all plates, molds, matrices, masters, tapes, film negatives, or other articles by means of which such copies or phonorecords may be reproduced.
(b) As part of a final judgment or decree, the court may order the destruction or other reasonable disposition of all copies or phonorecords found to have been made or used in violation of the copyright owner's exclusive rights, and of all plates, molds, matrices, masters, tapes, film negatives, or other articles by means of which such copies or phonorecords may be reproduced.

## Notes

* ↑ 28 U.S.C. 1498 concerns the liability of the United States Government for copyright infringement.

## Amendment history

Sections 502 and 503 were added by § 101 of title I of the Copyright Act of 1976 (Pub. L. 94-553, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2541), with effect from January 1, 1978.
# United States Code/Title 17/Chapter 5/Section 511

From the U.S. Copyright Office.: Added by the Copyright Remedy Clarification Act (Pub. L. 101-553, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2749), as amended by Public Laws 106-44 and 107-273.

## (a) In General.—

    Any State, any instrumentality of a State, and any officer or employee of a State or instrumentality of a State acting in his or her official capacity, shall not be immune, under the Eleventh Amendment of the Constitution of the United States or under any other doctrine of sovereign immunity, from suit in Federal Court by any person, including any governmental or nongovernmental entity, for a violation of any of the exclusive rights of a copyright owner provided by sections 106 through 122, for importing copies of phonorecords in violation of section 602, or for any other violation under this title.

## (b) Remedies.—

    In a suit described in subsection (a) for a violation described in that subsection, remedies (including remedies both at law and in equity) are available for the violation to the same extent as such remedies are available for such a violation in a suit against any public or private entity other than a State, instrumentality of a State, or officer or employee of a State acting in his or her official capacity. Such remedies include impounding and disposition of infringing articles under section 503, actual damages and profits and statutory damages under section 504, costs and attorney’s fees under section 505, and the remedies provided in section 510.

## Amendment history

Section 511 was added by the Copyright Remedy Clarification Act (Pub. L. 101-553, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2749).

### Public Law 106-44

Aug. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 221.
* Amended subsection (a) by substituting “121” for “119”.

### Intellectual Property and High Technology Technical Amendments Act of 2002

Pub. L. 107-273, Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1758.
* Amended subsection (a) by substituting “106 through 122” for “106 through 121”.
# Union Naval Stores Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
240 U.S. 284
Union Naval Stores Company v. United States
Argued: November 11, 1916. --- Decided: February 21, 1916
Mr. Richard William Stoutz for plaintiff in error.
Assistant Attorney General Knaebel for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Pitney delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Union Pacific Company v. Burke

United States Supreme Court
255 U.S. 317
Union Pacific Company v. Burke
Argued: Jan. 27, 1921. --- Decided: Feb 28, 1921
Mr. Oscar R. Houston, of New York City, for petitioner.
Messrs. Arthur W. Clement and Wilson E. Tipple, both of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice CLARKE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Union National Bank v. McBoyle

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
243 U.S. 26
Union National Bank v. McBoyle
Argued: January 24 and 25, 1917. --- Decided: March 6, 1917
Messrs. Charles A. Beardsley, R. M. Fitzgerald, and Carl H. Abbott for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. William H. Orrick, H. A. Powell, T. C. Coogan, and Julius Kahn for defendants in error.
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Union Pacific Company v. Board of Com'rs of Weld County Colorado

United States Supreme Court
247 U.S. 282
Union Pacific Company v. Board of Com'rs of Weld County Colorado
Argued: Nov. 15, 1916. --- Decided: June 3, 1918
Messrs. Clayton C. Dorsey, of Denver, Colo., and N. H. Loomis, of Omaha, Neb., for appellant.
Mr. Charles F. Tew, of Greeley, Colo., for appellees.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Union Oil Company of California v. Smith

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
249 U.S. 337
Union Oil Company of California v. Smith
Argued: Nov. 13, 1918. --- Decided: March 31, 1919
Messrs. Lewis W. Andrews and Thomas O. Toland, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 338-341 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice PITNEY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Reports/Volume 398

* 398 U.S. 1 (1970) Nash v. United States
* 398 U.S. 6 (1970) Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Association v. Bresler
* 398 U.S. 25 (1970) National Labor Relations Board v. Raytheon Company
* 398 U.S. 30 (1970) Dickey v. Florida
* 398 U.S. 58 (1970) Schacht v. United States
* 398 U.S. 71 (1970) Monks v. New Jersey
* 398 U.S. 73 (1970) Daniel v. Goliday
* 398 U.S. 74 (1970) Chandler v. Judicial Council of the Tenth Circuit
* 398 U.S. 144 (1970) Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Company
* 398 U.S. 235 (1970) Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerk's Union, Local 770
* 398 U.S. 262 (1970) Maxwell v. Bishop
* 398 U.S. 268 (1970) United States v. Armour & Company
* 398 U.S. 275 (1970) Wyman v. Rothstein
* 398 U.S. 278 (1970) Bloss v. Dykema
* 398 U.S. 280 (1970) Leitchfield Manufacturing Company v. United States
* 398 U.S. 281 (1970) Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers
* 398 U.S. 306 (1970) Hellenic Lines Limited v. Rhoditis
* 398 U.S. 319 (1970) Moon v. Maryland
* 398 U.S. 322 (1970) Department of Social Services of Iowa v. Dimery
* 398 U.S. 323 (1970) Price v. Georgia
* 398 U.S. 333 (1970) Welsh v. United States
* 398 U.S. 375 (1970) Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.
* 398 U.S. 410 (1970) Mulloy v. United States
* 398 U.S. 419 (1970) Evans v. Cornman
* 398 U.S. 427 (1970) Mitchell v. Donovan
* 398 U.S. 434 (1970) Walker v. Ohio
* 398 U.S. 435 (1970) Bassett v. Smith
* 398 U.S. 436 (1970) General Electric Company v. Local Union 191, International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers
* 398 U.S. 906 (1970) Warner v. Kewanee Machinery & Conveyor Company
* 398 U.S. 908 (1970) National Capital Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
* 398 U.S. 916 (1970) Stotland v. Pennsylvania
* 398 U.S. 921 (1970) Cohen v. Wilmington Housing Authority
* 398 U.S. 922 (1970) Tijerina v. Henry
* 398 U.S. 936 (1970) McGautha v. California
* 398 U.S. 936 (1970) Crampton v. Ohio
* 398 U.S. 960 (1970) Wiseman v. Massachusetts
* 398 U.S. 1057 (1970) Curtiss National Bank of Miami Springs v. Sabatino