OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Helen Keller with a Rose

"Others may see thee; I behold thee not"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1905), "Helen Keller with a Rose" in The Century Magazine (July 1905).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1909), "Helen Keller with a Rose" in Lyrics of Life (1909).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "Helen Keller with a Rose" in Poems II.

## See also by Mrs. Coates

* "To Helen Keller" (1904)
* "Against the Gate of Life—To Helen Keller" (1912)

## References

* ↑ View this version at Google Books.
# Helen

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Helen."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Helen, a play by Euripides. Multiple English translations exist.
* Helen (1834), by Maria Edgeworth, a novel.
* "Helen", a poem by R. S. Mitchell

### See also

* Helena
* To Helen
# Helen (Euripides)

* related portals: Ancient Greek drama.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Ἑλένη (Helenē, Latin: Helena), is a tragedy written by Euripides, and first produced in 412 BCE. The play was written just after the disastrous Sicilian Expedition, and deems war to be the root of all evil. It takes the unusual premise, which Herodotus argued in his Histories, that Helen had never in fact arrived at Troy, but was in Egypt during the entire Trojan War, and that the Helen who escaped with Paris, betraying her husband and her country and initiating the ten-year conflict, was actually an eidolon, a phantom look-alike.
English-language translations of Ἑλένη include:
* Helena, translated by Robert Potter (1781, 1783) 1st ed.
* Helen, translated by T. A. Buckley (1858)
* Helen, translated from the Paley text by E. P. Coleridge in The Plays of Euripides (1891) 1910 printing
* Helen, translated by C. S. Jerram (1892)
* Helen, translated by Arthur S. Way in The Tragedies of Euripides, in English verse (1896)
This work is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago. Translations of this work may be copyrighted.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hoiness v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
335 U.S. 297
Hoiness v. United States
Argued: Oct. 21, 1948. --- Decided: Nov 8, 1948
Mr. Herbert Resner, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
Mr. Harry I. Rand, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hohensee v. New Syndicate, Inc./Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
369 U.S. 659
Hohensee v. New Syndicate, Inc.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Goldlawr, Inc., v. Heiman, 369 U.S. 463, 82 S.Ct. 913, 8 L.Ed.2d 39.
Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice STEWART, for the reasons given in their dissent in the Goldlawr case, would deny certiorari.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hoke v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Hoke v. United States, 227 U.S. 308 (1913), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the United States Congress could not regulate prostitution per se, as that was strictly the province of the states. Congress could, however, regulate interstate travel for purposes of prostitution or “immoral purposes.” It upheld the Mann Act. Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
227 U.S. 308
Hoke v. United States
Argued: January 7 and 8, 1913. --- Decided: February 24, 1913
[Syllabus from pages 308-310 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. C. W. Howth, Hal W. Greer, T. H. Bowers, and Charles C. Luzenberg for plaintiffs in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 310-313 intentionally omitted]
Assistant Attorney General Harr for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 313-316 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hohensee v. New Syndicate, Inc.

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
369 U.S. 659
Hohensee v. New Syndicate, Inc.
See 370 U.S. 920, 82 S.Ct. 1552.
James C. Newton, for petitioner.
Stuart N. Updike, for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hohorst v. Packet Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
148 U.S. 262
Hohorst v. Packet Company
S. S.C.lark, for appellant.
Walter D. Edmonds, for appellee.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Globe Bank Trust Company of Paducah Kentucky v. Martin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
236 U.S. 288
Globe Bank Trust Company of Paducah Kentucky v. Martin
Argued: December 4 and 7, 1914. --- Decided: February 23, 1915
Messrs. D. H. Hughes, Alexander Gilchrist, C. K. Wheeler, and J. G. Wheeler for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from page 289 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. W. F. Bradshaw, Jr., and j. D. Mocquot for appelled in Nos. 99, 100, and 101, and for petitioners in No. 292.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 290-292 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Globe Indemnity Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
291 U.S. 476
Globe Indemnity Company v. United States
Argued: Feb. 13-14, 1934. --- Decided: March 5, 1934
[Syllabus from 477 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Frederic L. Ballard, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.
Mr. Samuel W. Cooper, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Globe Newspaper Company v. Walker

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
210 U.S. 356
Globe Newspaper Company v. Walker
Argued: April 23, 1908. --- Decided: June 1, 1908
Mr. William Quinby for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 356-358 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. H. L. Boutwell and A. W. Leven saler for defendants in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 358-360 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Globe Liquor Company v. San Roman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
332 U.S. 571
Globe Liquor Company v. San Roman
Argued: Dec. 17, 1947. --- Decided: Jan 5, 1948
Mr. Benjamin W. Heineman, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.
Mr. Nat M. Kahn, of Chicago, Ill., for respondents.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Globe Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Wolef

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
95 U.S. 326
Globe Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Wolef
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.
The Globe Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, on the 5th of November, 1869, issued to Eliza Garber a policy of insurance for $5,000 upon the life of her husband, commencing on the 1st of that month. The premium was payable annually on the 1st of November. The policy stipulated for the payment of the amount of the insurance within sixty days after due notice and proof of the death of the insured, subject, however, to certain express conditions. One of these conditions provided, that, if the premiums were not paid on or before the days mentioned for their payment, the company should not be liable for the sum insured, or any part of it, and that the policy should cease and determine. Another condition provided, that, if the insured resided in any part of the United States south of the 33d degree of north latitude, except in California, between the 1st of July and the 1st of November, without the consent of the company previously given in writing, the policy should be null and void. And the policy declared that agents of the company were not authorized to make, alter, or discharge contracts, or waive forfeitures.
The insured died at the city of New Orleans on the 11th of November, 1872. Between the 1st of July and the 1st of November of that year he had resided at that city, which is south of the 33d degree of north latitude, without the previous consent in writing of the company; and the annual premium due on the first of that month was not paid on or before that day. Due notice and proof of his death having been given to the company, and payment by it refused, suit was brought by Mrs. Garber in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, whence it was removed, on the petition of the company, to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, and the cause removed here by writ of error. Mrs. Garber died and Wolff, her executor, was made the defendant in error.
The other facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. John W. Noble for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. Montgomery Blair, contra.
MR. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Bliss

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
293 U.S. 144
Helvering v. Bliss
No. Nos 6 and 7 Argued: Oct. 9, 10, 1934. --- Decided: Nov 5, 1934
The Attorney General and Mr. James Crawford Biggs, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Messrs. R. L. Von Bernuth and James M. Rose, both of New York City, for respondent Bliss.
Messrs. Hugh Satterlee, of New York City, and J. E. MacCloskey, Jr., of Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent Harbison.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Bullard

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
303 U.S. 297
Helvering v. Bullard
Argued: Feb. 1, 1938. --- Decided: Feb 28, 1938
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings. Atty. Gen., and James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Mr. Samuel S. Holmes, of Chicago, Ill., for respondent.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Bruun

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Helvering v. Bruun, 309 U.S. 461 (1940), was an income tax case before the Supreme Court of the United States. It is notable (and thus appears frequently in law school casebooks) for the following holding:
    A landlord does realize a taxable gain when he repossesses property improved by a tenant.
Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
309 U.S. 461
Helvering v. Bruun
Argued: Feb. 28, 1940. --- Decided: March 25, 1940
Messrs. Robert H. Jackson, Atty. Gen., and Arnold Raum, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. John H. McEvers, of Kansas City, Mo., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 462-463 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Home Pastorals, Ballads and Lyrics/Sonnet

SONNET.
# Home Telephone Telegraph Company v. Los Angeles

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
211 U.S. 265
Home Telephone Telegraph Company v. Los Angeles
Argued: October 21, 1908. --- Decided: November 30, 1908
[Syllabus from pages 265-267 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Oscar A. Trippet and A. Haines for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 267-269 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Leslie R. Hewitt, John W. Shenk, and W. B. Mathews for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 269-270 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Moody delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Home Telephone Telegraph Company v. City of Los Angeles

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
227 U.S. 278
Home Telephone Telegraph Company v. City of Los Angeles
Argued: October 28, 1912. --- Decided: February 24, 1913
Mr. James A. Gibson for appellant.
Messrs. John W. Shenk and George E. Cryer for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from page 279 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Home Savings Bank v. Des Moines

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
205 U.S. 503
Home Savings Bank v. Des Moines
Argued: November 2, 5, 1906. --- Decided: for reargument December 3, 1906
Messrs. William G. Harvison and Horatio F. Dale for plaintiff in error in No. 82.
Messrs. Nathaniel T. Guernsey and George F. Henry for plaintiffs in error in Nos. 83 and 92.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 504-506 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. William H. Bremner and M. H. Cohen for defendants in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 506-508 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Moody delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Home Study Circle Library/The World's Great Artists

* I. Donatello
* II. Titian
* III. Raphael
* IV. Correggio
* V. Velasquez
* VI. Murillo
* VII. Dürer
* VIII. Holbein
* IX. Rubens
* X. Van Dyke
* XI. Rembrandt
* XII. Hals
* XIII. Millet
* XIV. Meissonier
* XV. Hogarth
* XVI. Reynolds
* XVII. Gainsborough
* XVIII. Turner
* XIX. Constable
* XX. Lawrence
* XXI. Landseer
* XXII. Stuart
# Home Study Circle Library

This encyclopedic series, published in 1898, covered a wide range of topics by volume.
* XIV. The World's Great Musicians
* XV. The World's Great Artists
# Home Telephone & Telegraph Company of Spokane v. Kuykendall

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 206
Home Telephone & Telegraph Company of Spokane v. Kuykendall
Argued: April 17, 1924. --- Decided: May 26, 1924
Messrs. W. V. Tanner, of Seattle, Wash., Frank T. Post, of Spokane, Wash., H. D. Pillsbury, of San Francisco, Cal., and Otto B. Rupp, of Seattle, Wash., for appellant.
Messrs. Raymond W. Clifford and John H. Dunbar, both of Olympia, Wash., for appellees.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Herring v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
293 U.S. 322
Herring v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. Nos 176 and 177 Argued: Nov. 16, 1934. --- Decided: Dec 3, 1934
Mr. Robert Ash, of Washington, D.C., for petitioners.
The Attorney General and Mr. William Stanley, Asst. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Herrman v. Miller

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
127 U.S. 363
Herrman v. Miller
S. G. Clarke and E. B. Smith, for plaintiffs in error.
Sol. Gen. Jenks, for defendants in error.
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Company v. Hall's Safe Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
208 U.S. 554
Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Company v. Hall's Safe Company
Argued: January 30, 1908. --- Decided: February 24, 1908
Messrs. Lawrence Maxwell, Jr., and Charles H. Aldrich for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 554-556 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Judson Harmon and William C. Cochran for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 556-557 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Herring v. United States

United States Supreme Court
500 U.S. 946
Herring v. United States
No. 90-7163
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
Justice WHITE, with whom Justice BLACKMUN joins, dissenting from denial of certiorari.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Historical Lectures and Addresses

* related portals: Anglicanism, England.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Editor: Louise Creighton
HISTORICAL LECTURES
AND ADDRESSES
BY
MANDELL CREIGHTON, D.D,, D.C.L., LL.D., etc.
SOMETIME BISHOP OF LONDON
EDITED BY
LOUISE CREIGHTON
LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO.
39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON
NEW YORK AND BOMBAY
1903
TO
HIS OLD PUPILS
I DEDICATE THIS BOOK IN THE HOPE
THAT IT MAY SPEAK TO THEM WITH HIS VOICE,
AND THAT HISTORY MAY BE
TO THEM AS IT WAS TO HIM
A LIVING STUDY,
GIVING TO THEM ALSO
NOT ONLY REVERENCE FOR THE PAST BUT GUIDANCE
FOR THE FUTURE.
PREFACE
Of the lectures in this volume those on Saint Edward the Confessor, the Picturesque in History, Heroes, and Elizabethan London have already appeared in the Cornhill Magazine, and I have to thank the Editor for kind permission to reprint them here. I have also to express my thanks to the Syndics of the Cambridge University Press, to the Curators of the Oxford University Chest, and to the Rev. Dr. A. J. Mason and the Rev. Professor W. E. Collins, for kind permissions to include in this volume the Rede lecture, the Romanes lecture, and the lecture on Laud's Position in the History of the Church of England. The two former were published at the time of their delivery, and the latter appeared in the volume issued for the Archbishop Laud Commemoration. The other lectures have never been published. Those on the Friars, Bishop ​Grosseteste and his Times, the English Church in the Time of Elizabeth and the Study of a Country are printed from the reporter's notes as they were delivered. Though naturally less finished productions than the others, they give a very good idea of Dr. Creighton's manner of popular lecturing. His inaugural lecture as Dixie Professor of Ecclesiastical History, which is here printed for the first time, shows what history meant to him, and what he tried to make it mean to others. To him its living interest lay in the fact that he saw everywhere when he looked into the past "the working of great elemental forces, which are common to human society at all times". What he cared to note in every age, whether past or present, was "the thing that was accomplished, the ideas which clothed themselves with power".
LOUISE CREIGHTON.
CONTENTS :
| The Teaching of Ecclesiastical History | PAGE 1 |
| The Congregationalists | 29 |
| The Baptists | 48 |
| The Coming of the Friars | 69 |
| St. Francis of Assisi | 84 |
| The Influence of the Friars | 98 |
| Bishop Grosseteste and his Times, 1st Lecture | 116 |
| """2nd Lecture | 124 |
| """3rd Lecture | 136 |
| The English Church in the Reign of Elizabeth | 149 |
| Laud's Position in the History of the Church of England | 164 |
| The Early Renaissance in England | 188 |
| The English National Character | 213 |
| Saint Edward the Confessor | 241 |
| The Picturesque in History | 261 |
| The Study of a Country | 285 |
| Heroes | 305 |
| Elizabethan London | 324 |
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse