# Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act of 2008/Title V
## TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS
### SEC. 501. GAO STUDY ON PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF MANUFACTURERS.

    (a) Study- The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study to help determine how the Federal Government could better protect the intellectual property of manufacturers by quantification of the impacts of imported and domestic counterfeit goods on--
       (1) the manufacturing industry in the United States; and
       (2) the overall economy of the United States.
    (b) Contents- In conducting the study required under subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall examine--
       (1) the extent that counterfeit manufactured goods are actively being trafficked in and imported into the United States;
       (2) the impacts on domestic manufacturers in the United States of current law regarding defending intellectual property, including patent, trademark, and copyright protections;
       (3) the nature and scope of current statutory law and case law regarding protecting trade dress from being illegally copied;
       (4) the extent which such laws are being used to investigate and prosecute acts of trafficking in counterfeit manufactured goods;
       (5) any effective practices or procedures that are protecting all types of intellectual property; and
       (6) any changes to current statutes or rules that would need to be implemented to more effectively protect the intellectual property rights of manufacturers.
    (c) Report- Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the study required under subsection (a).

### SEC. 502. GAO AUDIT AND REPORT ON NONDUPLICATION AND EFFICIENCY.

Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall conduct an audit and submit a report to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives on--
       (1) the efforts, activities, and actions of the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator and the Attorney General in achieving the goals and purposes of this Act, as well as in carrying out any responsibilities or duties assigned to each such individual or agency under this Act;
       (2) any possible legislative, administrative, or regulatory changes that Comptroller General recommends be taken by or on behalf of the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator or the Attorney General to better achieve such goals and purposes, and to more effectively carry out such responsibilities and duties;
       (3) the effectiveness of any actions taken and efforts made by the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator and the Attorney General to--
          (A) minimize duplicating the efforts, materials, facilities, and procedures of any other Federal agency responsible for the enforcement, investigation, or prosecution of intellectual property crimes; and
          (B) enhance the efficiency and consistency with which Federal funds and resources are expended to enforce, investigate, or prosecute intellectual property crimes, including whether the IPEC has utilized existing personnel, materials, technologies, and facilities, such as the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center established at the Department of Homeland Security; and
       (4) any actions or efforts that the Comptroller General recommends be taken by or on behalf of the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator and the Attorney General to reduce duplication of efforts and increase the efficiency and consistency with which Federal funds and resources are expended to enforce, investigate, or prosecute intellectual property crimes.

### SEC. 503. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the United States intellectual property industries have created millions of high-skill, high-paying United States jobs and pay billions of dollars in annual United States tax revenues;
       (2) the United States intellectual property industries continue to represent a major source of creativity and innovation, business start-ups, skilled job creation, exports, economic growth, and competitiveness;
       (3) counterfeiting and infringement results in billions of dollars in lost revenue for United States companies each year and even greater losses to the United States economy in terms of reduced job growth, exports, and competitiveness;
       (4) the growing number of willful violations of existing Federal criminal laws involving counterfeiting and infringement by actors in the United States and, increasingly, by foreign-based individuals and entities is a serious threat to the long-term vitality of the United States economy and the future competitiveness of United States industry;
       (5) terrorists and organized crime utilize piracy, counterfeiting, and infringement to fund some of their activities;
       (6) effective criminal enforcement of the intellectual property laws against violations in all categories of works should be among the highest priorities of the Attorney General;
       (7) with respect to all crimes related to the theft of intellectual property, the Attorney General shall give priority to cases with a nexus to terrorism and organized crime; and
       (8) with respect to criminal counterfeiting and infringement of computer software, including those by foreign-owned or foreign-controlled entities, the Attorney General should give priority to cases--
          (A) involving the willful theft of intellectual property for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain;
          (B) where the theft of intellectual property is central to the sustainability and viability of the commercial activity of the enterprise (or subsidiary) involved in the violation;
          (C) where the counterfeited or infringing goods or services enables the enterprise to unfairly compete against the legitimate rights holder; or
          (D) where there is actual knowledge of the theft of intellectual property by the directors or officers of the enterprise.