OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Hartford-Empire Company v. United States (323 U.S. 386)

United States Supreme Court
323 U.S. 386
Hartford-Empire Company v. United States
Argued: and submitted Oct. 9, 10, 1944. --- Decided: Jan 8, 1945
See 324 U.S. 570, 65 S.Ct. 815.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.
[Syllabus from pages 386-390 intentionally omitted]
Mr. John T. Cahill, of New York City, for appellants Hartford Empire Co. and others.
Mr. Robert T. Swaine, of New York City, for appellants Owens-Illinois Glass Co. and others.
Mr. Boykin C. Wright, of New York City, for appellants Corning Glass Works and others.
Mr. Stephen H. Philbin, of New York City, for appellants Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. and others.
Mr. Lehr Fess, of Toledo, Ohio, for appellants Lynch Corporation and others.
Mr. E. W. McCallister, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants Ball Brothers Co. and others.
Mr. Fred E. Fuller, of Toledo, Ohio, for appellants Collins and Fulton, and others.
Mr. Luther Day, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellants Glass Container Ass'n of America and others.
Mr. Ralph Emery, of Toledo, Ohio, for appellants Thatcher Mfg. Co. and others.
Messrs. Samuel S. Isseks, of New York City and Hugh B. Cox, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Mr. Lawrence C. Kingsland, of St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for appellee.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hartford-Empire Company v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Hartford-Empire Company v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Hartford-Empire Company v. United States (323 U.S. 386)
* Hartford-Empire Company v. United States (324 U.S. 570)
# Hartford Accident Indemnity Company of Hartford v. Southern Pacific Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
273 U.S. 207
Hartford Accident Indemnity Company of Hartford v. Southern Pacific Company
Argued: Dec. 2, 1926. --- Decided: Feb 21, 1927
Messrs. John Neethe, of Galveston, Tex., and E. C. Brandenburg, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from page 208 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Roscoe H. Hupper, of New York City, for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 209-210 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hartford Accident Indemnity Company v. Bunn

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
285 U.S. 169
Hartford Accident Indemnity Company v. Bunn
Argued: Jan. 14, 1932. --- Decided: March 14, 1932
Messrs. Marion Smith, of Atlanta, Ga., L. Barrett Jones
and W. Calvin Wells, both of Jackson, Miss., and Arthur G. Powell, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 170-173 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Gerard H. Brandon and S. B. Laub, both of Natchez, Miss., and Garner W. Green, of Jackson, Miss., for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from page 173 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hartford-Empire Company v. United States (324 U.S. 570)

United States Supreme Court
324 U.S. 570
Hartford-Empire Company v. United States
On Petition for Clarification or Reconsideration Filed Feb. 1, 1945.
Decided April 2, 1945.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.
Messrs. John T. Cahill and Thurlow M. Gordon, both of New York City, Stuart S. Wall, of Toledo, Ohio, and Jerrold G. Van Cise, of New York City, for appellant Hartford-Empire Co.
Messrs. Robert T. Swaine, of New York City, Lloyd T. Williams and Henry A. Middleton, both of Toledo, Ohio, and George B. Turner, of New York City, for appellants Owens-Illinois Glass Co. et al.
Mr. Boykin C. Wright, of New York City, for appellant Corning Glass Works.
Messrs. Stephen H. Philbin, of New York City, and Joseph D. Stecher, of Toledo, Ohio, for appellants Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. et al.
Mr. Charles Fahy, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Messrs. Arnold Boyd, of New York City, and Hamilton Vreeland, Jr., of Washington, D.C., for Knox Companies, as amici curiae.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hartford Accident Indemnity Company v. Delta & Pine Land Company

United States Supreme Court
292 U.S. 143
Hartford Accident Indemnity Company v. Delta & Pine Land Company
Argued: and Submitted March 15, 1934. --- Decided: April 9, 1934
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the State of Mississippi.
Mr. Wm. M. Hall, of Memphis, Tenn., for appellants.
Mr. Garner W. Green, of Jackson, Miss., for appellee.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# How and What to Grow in a Kitchen Garden of One Acre (10th Ed)/Situation of the Garden

Layout 2
SITUATION OF THE GARDEN.
The garden should be situated conveniently near the farm buildings, as it should be visited frequently; a variety of tools are needed in its care, and each should be put away as soon as done with, that it may be preserved in the best order for use. It is often necessary to carry water to help along young trans​planted stock that has been overtaken by a dry spell. Where the distance has to be traversed so frequently, it naturally follows that the shorter it is the greater will be the saving in time and the less likely is the garden to be neglected.
The garden should be as nearly level as possible, or, if sloping, not so much so as to be in danger of being washed by heavy rains. If sloping, the slope should lie to the south, or as nearly south as possible. A plantation or hedge of evergreens on the north side of the garden will be found a wonderful aid to the earliness of the garden truck and to the hardiness of the small fruit plants and roots which remain in the ground all winter; if a woods or high hill be directly on the north and northwest of your garden, it will answer nearly as well as the hedge of evergreens. The garden should be so situated as to have good surface drainage; without this or expensive underdraining, it will hardly be possible to raise early or fine vegetables at any profit. These I consider the most essential points in selecting the plot for the garden; of course, a good, rich soil is to be desired, but the gardener can, by the liberal use of manure and thorough cultivation, remedy a deficiency of this kind in a couple of years, while he cannot make a favorable location for early vegetables on a north slope if he should try a lifetime. By a careful study of the varieties in cultivation, and by trials of their merits in your garden and on your table, experience will be gained which will enable you to grow as fine vegetables and fruits on heavy soil as on light, sandy loam, and vice versa.
# How and What to Grow in a Kitchen Garden of One Acre (10th Ed)/Saving Seeds

Layout 2
SAVING SEEDS.
The gardener will consult his judgment and his pocketbook in buying seeds, as there are many varie​ties of which, if he has a good strain, he can save as good seed as he can buy; but the greatest care should be used in doing so, as the quality and quantity will both rapidly deteriorate if inferior specimens arc selected from which to save seed. Thus it will not do to take off all the best ears of corn, or the tightest heads of lettuce, using the nubbins and runts for seed, or the next year the nubbins will predominate and the lettuce will go to seed without taking the trouble to form a head at all.
The best plan is to set apart a section of the row of each variety for seed, and not gather any for use from that part; here all the nubbins and inferior specimens could be pulled off, throwing the full strength of the plant into the finest fruits; and the same way with the vines; one or more hills, as desired, could be kept for the purpose of bearing seed only.
All seeds should be thoroughly cleaned and dried, and each package should be carefully marked with name and date before storing. The seed chest should be in some cool place where there is no danger of frost or very warm heat, and, most of all, no danger from dampness. It is important to have the date of saving the seed marked, so that when all is not used it may be kept, as frequently a crop fails from a bad season or other causes, and a new lot of equal merit cannot be obtained, the date serving to tell how good the seed is; seed of some vegetables retaining vitality for only two years, and others as long as ten years.
# How and What to Grow in a Kitchen Garden of One Acre (10th Ed)/Rhubarb, Currants and Gooseberries

Layout 2
RHUBARB, CURRANTS AND GOOSEBERRIES.
These three I would plant in the same row, in the small fruit plot or permanent part of the garden, mainly because a third of a row of each will afford an ample supply for a good-sized family, and all require nearly the same treatment. The plants of each are all set together, each in its own third of the row, not interspersed. The plants should be set as early in the spring as possible, or can be planted in the fall and well mulched with manure. The crowns of the rhubarb should be set an inch or two under the surface, and no stalks pulled until the second or third season; in the fall, when the ground is frozen hard, the old leaves should be pulled off and the row well mulched with long manure; in the spring this should be worked down to the roots, when the ground is fit to work, and the soil kept loose and free from weeds while the rhubarb is making its growth. The stalks can be pulled as soon as they are large enough for use, and can be pulled until they become so small as to be unfit for use; then dig in some fine manure or compost, and let it grow at will until fall, when the stalks will again be fit for use, though this second crop is generally allowed to go to waste, mainly, I think, through ignorance of the fact that it is just as ​palatable as in the spring, and that it can easily be canned for winter use. Like asparagus, it must be liberally and continually fed, to have it in fine condition and of good size.
The currants and gooseberries are subject to the ravages of the currant worm, which cleans up every leaf and berry on the bushes just as they are about to ripen. To prevent this, the bushes should be dusted with white hellebore when the first worm makes his appearance; as this is a very strong poison many are afraid to use it; and, indeed, great care must be taken in using the fruit; still, the worms usually appear about the time the bushes are in bloom, and if promptly welcomed will have disappeared, and the poison be washed off the bushes before the fruit has formed. Any one who does not like to use the hellebore can dust the bushes with road dust or dry wood ashes every morning while the dew is still on the leaves; care should be taken that the under side of the leaves should receive a good portion of whatever is used. There is still another way of getting rid of these pests, and that is by hand-picking them; but any one who has tried it will agree with me that it is a somewhat tedious process when done every morning for a couple of weeks.
When the fall comes these bushes should be well mulched, and in the spring, before the growth starts, the old wood should be cut out of them, care being taken not to trim them too severely; never take out more than a third of the wood, or you will trim away your crop of fruit for the season. When the spring opens, dig in the mulch and keep the ground well ​worked and free from weeds, as in the asparagus and rhubarb.
# How and What to Grow in a Kitchen Garden of One Acre (10th Ed)/Sage

Layout 2
SAGE.
A dozen roots or more of this herb should be planted in some part of the garden where it will not be disturbed by the plow, or if this cannot be done readily, the roots can be taken up when the plowing is done, divided and reset, which would probably raise a larger and finer crop of leaves than allowing them to stand in the same place year after year. The crop should be cut off a few inches above the ground, as soon as it has made its growth and before it begins to bloom. The shoots will again start to grow, and two or three crops can be cut in a season; the cut tops can be tied in bunches and hung to the rafters. or spread thinly on the floor of a cool loft or garret.
# How and What to Grow in a Kitchen Garden of One Acre (10th Ed)/Spinach

Layout 2
SPINACH.
This is a quick-growing green, and very hardy, making it valuable for early spring and late fall growing. It cannot be raised during summer, on account of its running immediately to seed without ​making many leaves. It can be sown as soon as the ground can be worked in the spring, and will be ready for use in a few weeks; about three sowings may be made, two weeks apart, or more, if the season is longer, though it will hardly be good if planted after the middle of May. The whole plant is cut off even with the ground, at any time before it starts to run to seed, the leaves and stems being used as boiled greens. Large sowings should be made in October, of the hardy variety, as it can be cut throughout the winter; a later sowing may be made the first of November, and lightly covered with litter when the ground has been frozen hard; this covering should be raked off early in the spring, and it will complete its growth before the first spring planting is ready for use.
VARIETIES OF SPINACH.
New Thick-Leaved Round.—This variety produces large, thick, dark green leaves, somewhat crumpled. It possesses the valuable quality of standing for some time after attaining its growth, before running to seed.
The Norfolk Savoy Leaved.—The leaves of this kind are wrinkled like a Savoy cabbage. It makes a large bunch of succulent leaves, producing more
NEW LONG-STANDING SPINACH.
New Long Standing.—This is one of the best varieties for spring sowing, as it stands longer than any other before running to seed. The leaves are thick, fleshy and crumpled like the Norfolk Savoy Leaved.
# How and What to Grow in a Kitchen Garden of One Acre (10th Ed)/Sweet Potatoes

Layout 2
SWEET POTATOES.
Like some other vegetables, these are generally supposed to require special soil and situation to do well, but with plenty of manure and good cultivation they can be raised of fine size and quality in any garden. As described in the chapter on hotbeds, the old potatoes are planted in a warm bed, about the first of April, and when the ground is prepared, these are taken up and the sprouts broken off close to the potato. The potatoes should be buried two or three inches deep in the bed, which will give each shoot a bunch of fine roots when it is broken off. When the nights are warm, and the trees well out in leaf, plow a double furrow where the row of sweet potatoes is to be; that is, run the plow each way in the same furrow; then fill in two or three inches of fine manure, and plow the furrows back again, forming a ridge over the manure. In the centre of this ridge plant the sets about one foot apart; they must be kept well cultivated, and the running vines must not be allowed to strike root into the soil, or they will form lots of small potatoes, and none large enough for use; some gardeners keep the vines coiled round the central plant, but the easier way is to throw the vines from two rows together, then cultivate the side left bare, and throw them back again, cultivating the other side; after the first time they need not be moved but once for each cultivation, as the blank side can be cultivated and the vines thrown over on it, leaving the other side free, which can be cultivated first the next time it is done, and the vines thrown back. Throwing the vines over can be done very quickly by run​ning a rake handle or long light pole under them, and throwing its whole length of them over at once: they can be dug as soon as large enough for use, by scraping the dirt away from the side of the hill, the potatoes pulled off, and the vines left to form more. The whole crop should be dug as soon as the vines are blackened by the first frost, and spread out in a cool dry place, where there will be no danger of their freezing. On account of the vines taking so much room, the rows should be at least five feet apart.
# Heartbreak House, Great Catherine, and Playlets of the War/O'Flaherty V. C.

Written 1915, Published 1919
O'FLAHERTY V.C.
XXVIII
* Preface
* Play
# Heartbreak House, Great Catherine, and Playlets of the War/Heartbreak House

Written 1913-1919, first staged 1920, in NY
HEARTBREAK HOUSE XXVI 1913–16
* Preface
* Act 1
* Act 2
* Act 3
# Higginbotham v. City of Baton Rouge

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
306 U.S. 535
HIGGINBOTHAM v. CITY OF BATON ROUGE, LA.
No. 462. Argued: March 3, 1939. --- Decided: April 17, 1939.
See 307 U.S. --, 59 S.Ct. 831, 83 L.Ed. --.
Messrs. Paul G. Borron, of Baton Rouge, La., and Edward Rightor, of New Orleans, La., for appellant.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Higgins v. Keuffel

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
140 U.S. 428
Higgins v. Keuffel
[Statement of Case from pages 428-430 intentionally omitted]
Wm. A. Redding and Chas. B. Alexander, for appellants.
Louis C. Raegener, for appellees.
Mr. Justice FIELD, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Higgins v. Carr Bros. Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
317 U.S. 572
Higgins v. Carr Bros. Company
Argued: and Submitted Nov. 19, 1942. --- Decided: Jan 18, 1943
Mr. Edward B. Perry, of Portland, Maine, for petitioner.
Messrs. Clement F. Robinson and Francis W. Sullivan, both of Portland, Maine, for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Higgins v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
312 U.S. 212
Higgins v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Argued: Jan. 10-13, 1941. --- Decided: Feb 3, 1941
See 312 U.S. 714, 61 S.Ct. 728, 85 L.Ed. --.
Mr. Selden Bacon, of New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Arnold Raum, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Indian Home Rule (1919 edition)

Ganesh & Co., Madras, 1919
INDIAN HOME RULE
BY
M. K. GANDHI
Reprinted with a new foreword by the author.
GANESH & CO.,
MADRAS.
page
NOTE
The doctrine of violence is more widely believed in than is generally realised. The votaries of violence can be divided into two classes. Some, a small and dwindling class, believe in it and are prepared to act according to their faith. Others, a very large class always, and now, after bitter experiences of the failure of constitutional agitation, larger than ever, believe in violence, but that belief does not lead them to action. It disables them from work on any basis other than force. The belief in violence serves to dissuade them from all other kinds of work or sacrifice. In both cases the evil is great.
There can be no reconstruction or hope for this land of ours, unless we eradicate the worship of force in all its forms, and establish work on a basis other than violence. A refutation of the doctrine of violence is, in the present situation of the affairs of our country, more necessary than ever.
To this end, nothing better can be conceived than the publication and wide distribution of Mr. Gandhi's famous book.
It was extremely patriotic of Messrs. Ganesh and Company to have readily agreed to undertake the work when they were approached with the request.
C. Rajagopalachar.
page
FOREWARD
I have re-read this book-let more than once. The value at the present moment lies in re-printing it as it is. But if I had to revise it, there is only one word I would alter in accordance with a promise made to an English friend. She took exception to my use of the word. 'prostitute' in speaking of the Parliament. Her fine taste recoiled from the indelicacy of the expression. I remind the reader that the book-let purports to be a free translation of the original which is in Gujarati.
After years of endeavour to put into practice the views expressed in the following pages, I feel that the way shown therein is the only true way to Swaraj. Satyagrah—the law of love is the Law of life. Departure from it leads to disintegration. A firm adherence to it leads to regeneration.
BOMBAY$\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ 28th May 1919.
M. K. GANDHI.
page
CONTENTS :
| CHAP | FOREWORD | PAGE |
| I | The Congress and its officials | 1 |
| II | The Partition of Bengal | 10 |
| III | Discontent and unrest | 13 |
| IV | What is Swaraj? | 15 |
| V | The Condition of England | 19 |
| VI | Civilisation | 25 |
| VII | Why was India Lost | 31 |
| VIII | The Condition of India | 36 |
| IX | Do (Railways) | 41 |
| X | Do Hindus and Mahomedans | 46 |
| XI | Do (Lawyers) | 56 |
| XII | Do (Doctors) | 62 |
| XIII | What is true Civilisation | 65 |
| XIV | How can India become Free | 71 |
| XV | Italy and India | 76 |
| XVI | Brute Force | 81 |
| XVII | Passive Resistance | 92 |
| XVIII | Education | 108 |
| XIX | Machinery | 118 |
| XX | Conclusions | 137 |
| | Appendices | |