OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# General Electric Company v. Local Union 191, International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
398 U.S. 436
General Electric Company v. Local Union 191, International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerk's Union, Local 770, 398 U.S. 235, 90 S.Ct. 1583, 26 L.Ed.2d 199.
Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice DOUGLAS dissent.
Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# General Electric Company v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
326 U.S. 242
General Electric Company v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Company
Argued: Oct. 18, 19, 1945. --- Decided: Nov 5, 1945
See 326 U.S. 810, 66 S.Ct. 227.
'Mr. Alexander C. Neave, of New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, for respondents.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# General Electric Company v. Local Union 191, International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
398 U.S. 436
General Electric Company v. Local Union 191, International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# General Electric Company v. Local 205, United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
353 U.S. 547
General Electric Company v. Local 205, United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America
Argued: March 26, 1957. --- Decided: June 3, 1957
Mr.
Warren F. Farr, Boston, Mass., for the petitioner.
Mr. Allan R. Rosenberg, Boston, Mass., for the respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# General Electric Company v. Local 205, United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America/Dissent Frankfurter

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
353 U.S. 547
General Electric Company v. Local 205, United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America
Argued: March 26, 1957. --- Decided: June 3, 1957
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER dissenting. For dissenting opinion see 353 U.S. 448, 77 S.Ct. 923.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# General Electric Company v. Marvel Rare Metals Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
287 U.S. 430
General Electric Company v. Marvel Rare Metals Company
Argued: Nov. 17, 1932. --- Decided: Dec 12, 1932
Messrs. Lawrence Bristol and Charles Neave, both of New York City, for petitioners.
Messrs. William C. McCoy and Harold Elno Smith, both of Cleveland, Ohio, for respondents.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fifty spiritual homilies of St. Macarius the Egyptian/Homily 36

HOMILY XXXVI
Concerning the twofold resurrection of souls and bodies, and of the divers glory of the risen.
1. THE resurrection of dead souls is even now. The resurrection of bodies is in that day. But as the stars, though fixed in heaven, are not all equal, but one differs from another in brightness and magnitude, so in spiritual things there are advances, according to the measure of faith, in the Spirit Himself, one man richer than another. The scripture says, He that speaketh in a tongue speaketh by the Spirit of God, He is a spiritual man, speaking to God. But he that prophesieth, edifieth the church. The latter had the greater abundance of grace. The one edifies himself only; the other his neighbour also.
This is like a grain of corn sown in the earth; the same grain out of the same heart produces many grains differing from each other. And again the ears, some are larger, some smaller, but all are gathered into one threshing-floor, one barn; though they differ, one bread is made of them. 2. Or as in a city there are multitudes of people, and some are infant children, some men, or young men; but all drink water of one well, and all eat of one bread, and have one air to breathe; or as lamps are, one with two wicks and one with seven, but where the greater abundance of light is, the illumination is greater. So as many as are in fire and light cannot be in darkness; but there is much difference. If a father has two sons, one a child, the Other a young man, he sends the one abroad to foreign cities and countries, but the little one he keeps continually under guard, because he can do nothing. Glory be to God. Amen.
# Fifty spiritual homilies of St. Macarius the Egyptian/Homily 39

HOMILY XXXIX
Why the Holy Scripture was given to us by God.
1. AS a king writes letters to those upon whom he wishes to confer patents and special gifts, and signifies to them all, “endeavour to come quickly to me, that you may receive from me royal gifts”; and if they do not come and receive them, they will be none the better off for having read the letters, but, on the contrary, are liable to be put to death for not choosing to go and be honoured by the king’s hand; so God, the King, has sent to men the holy scriptures as His letters, declaring by them that they should pray to God and believing should ask and receive a heavenly gift of the substance of His Godhead; for it is written, That we should be made partakers of the divine nature. But if man will not come, and ask, and receive, he is none the better off for having read the scriptures, but is rather liable to death, because he did not choose to receive from the heavenly King the gift of life, without which it is impossible to obtain immortal life, which is Christ. To whom be glory for ever. Amen.
# Fifty spiritual homilies of St. Macarius the Egyptian/Homily 41

HOMILY XLI
Very deep are the secret chambers of the soul, which grows in part with the growth of grace or of wickednesses.
1. THE precious vessel of the soul is of great depth, as it says in a certain place, He seeketh out the deep, and the heart. When man swerved from the commandment, and came under sentence of wrath, sin took him for her subject; and being herself like a great deep of bitterness in subtilty and depth, she entered within and took possession of the ranges of the soul, even to the deepest inner chambers of it. In such fashion as this let us liken the soul and sin when mixed with it, as if there should be a great big tree with many branches and it has its roots in the deepest parts of the earth. So the sin which had come in, taking possession of the ranges of the deepest chambers of the soul, came to be customary and to have the first say, growing up with each man from infancy, and going up and down with him, and instructing him in evil things.
2. When therefore the influence of divine grace has overshadowed the soul according to the measure of each man’s faith, and he receives help from on high, still grace has overshadowed him only in part. Let not a man imagine that his whole soul has been enlightened. There is still a large range of wickedness within, and the man has need of much labour and pains, corresponding to the grace given him. That is the reason why divine grace began to visit the soul only in part, though it had power to cleanse and perfect the man in the turn of an hour, in order to test the man’s purpose, whether he preserves his love towards God entire, not complying with the evil one in anything, but lending himself wholly to grace. In this way the soul, approving itself time after time, and grieving grace in nothing, nor using it despitefully, is helped by this method of little by little; and grace itself finds range in the soul, and strikes root even to the deepest parts and reasonings of it, when the soul on many occasions approves itself and corresponds with grace, until the whole soul is embraced by the heavenly grace, which thenceforth reigns in the vessel itself.
3. But if any one is not very humble, he is delivered to Satan, and is stripped naked of the divine grace that was given him, and is tempted with many afflictions, and then his self-esteem is shewn in its true colours, because in reality he is naked and wretched. He who is rich in the grace of God ought to be very humble and contrite of heart, and to consider himself as poor and having nothing. None of it is his own. Another gave it him, and takes it away when He pleases. He who humbles himself thus before God and men is able to keep the grace that was given to him, as the Lord says, He that humbleth himself shall be exalted. Elect though he be of God, let him be reprobate to himself; and being really faithful, let him consider himself unworthy. Such souls are well pleasing to God, and are quickened in Christ, to whom be glory and might for ever. Amen.
# Fifty spiritual homilies of St. Macarius the Egyptian/Homily 35

HOMILY XXXV
Concerning the old Sabbath and the new.
1. IN the shadow of the law given by Moses God commanded that every man should rest on the sabbath and do nothing. This was a type and shadow of the true sabbath given to the soul from the Lord. For the soul to which it has been granted to be set free from base and foul thoughts both keeps true sabbath and enjoys true rest, being idle and at leisure so far as the works of darkness are concerned. There, in the typical sabbath, although they rested in bodily fashion, their souls were in bondage to wickednesses and sins. This, the true sabbath, is true rest, the soul being idle and cleansed from the suggestions of Satan, and resting in the eternal rest and joy of the Lord.
2. As then He enjoined that even the unreasoning animals should rest on the sabbath day, that the ox should not be forced under the yoke of necessity, and that they should not lade the ass—for the animals also were to rest from their heavy works—so when the Lord came and gave the true eternal sabbath, He gave rest to the soul which was burdened and heavy laden with the burdens of the iniquity of unclean imaginations, and labouring perforce at the works of unrighteousness, as being in bondage to bitter masters; and He lightened it of the burdens, hard to be borne, of vain and impure imaginations; and He took away the yoke, the bitter yoke, of the works of unrighteousness, and refreshed the soul when it was wearied with the imaginations of uncleanness.
3. The Lord calls man to rest, saying, Come, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest; and as many souls as are obedient and draw near, He makes them rest from all these heavy, burdensome, unclean thoughts, and they are idle from all iniquity, keeping a true, delicious, holy sabbath, and celebrate a festival of the Spirit, a festival of joy and gladness unspeakable; and they perform a pure service, well pleasing to God, out of a pure heart. This is the true and the holy sabbath. Let us therefore beseech God that we also may enter into this rest, that we may be idle from base and evil and vain imaginations, that thus we may be able to serve God out of a pure heart, and celebrate the feast of the Holy Ghost. Blessed is he who enters into that rest. Glory to Him whose good pleasure it is, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, for ever. Amen.
# Gammer Gurton's garland of nursery songs and Toby Tickle's collection of riddles/Gammer Gurton's advice to all good children

GAMMER GURTON's
ADVICE TO ALL GOOD CHILDREN.
My dutiful children, do as you're bid,
And you'll be applauded and never be chid.
And your Friends and your Wealth,
 and your health shall increase,
Till you're crown'd with the blessings
 of plenty and peace.
# Gammer Gurton's garland of nursery songs and Toby Tickle's collection of riddles/Cock-a-doodle-do

COCK-A-DOODLE-DO.
Cock-a-Doodle-Do,
My dame has lost her Shoe,
The Cat has lost her Fiddle-stick,
And knows not what to do.
Round about, round about,
 Maggoty pie.
My father loves good ale,
 And so do I.
# Gammer Gurton's garland of nursery songs and Toby Tickle's collection of riddles/A tree

A TREE.
In Spring I look gay,
Deck'd in comely array,
In Summer more clothing I wear:
When colder it grows,
I fling off my clothes,
And in Winter quite naked appear.
# Gammer Gurton's garland of nursery songs and Toby Tickle's collection of riddles/An ox

AN OX.
I am as useful to the nation,
As some who move in higher station;
And fraught with virtues deem'd inherent,
May well be call'd the kings vicegerent;
As I his subjects render stronger,
And die that they may live the longer.
# Gammer Gurton's garland of nursery songs and Toby Tickle's collection of riddles/Bottled ale

BOTTLED ALE.
Without teeth it bites,
Without tongue it sings,
It foams without anger,
And flies without wings.
# Gammer Gurton's garland of nursery songs and Toby Tickle's collection of riddles/Father Grey-beard

FATHER GREY-BEARD.
Old Father Grey-beard,
 Tho' now stiff and old,
Was once young and lively,
 Courageous and bold:
Then timely learn this truth,
That age soon follows youth.
# Gammer Gurton's garland of nursery songs and Toby Tickle's collection of riddles/A sheep

A SHEEP.
There's not a creature moves on ground
More harmless than myself is found;
Yet ever since the world began
I have been slain by cruel man.
Altho' I'm stupid, some will say,
I speak one word as well as they.
Freely tho' my life I give,
I'm stript each year to let you live.
# Gammer Gurton's garland of nursery songs and Toby Tickle's collection of riddles/Baa baa, black sheep

BAA BAA, BLACK SHEEP.
Baa baa, black sheep, have you any wool?
Yes, Mary, have I, three bags full,
One for my master, and one for my dame,
And one for the little boy that lives in the lane.
# Georgia v. Brailsford (2 U.S. 402)/Separate Wilson

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinions in Seriatim
* Dissenting Opinions Johnson Cushing
* Separate Opinions Iredell Blair Wilson Jay
​Wilson, Justice.I confess, that I have not been able to form an opinion which is perfectly satisfactory to my own mind, upon the points that have been discussed. If Georgia has a right to the bond, it is strictly a legal right; but to enforce a strictly legal right, the present seems, at the first blush, to be an awkward and irregular proceeding. Again: Georgia had not a right, or she had a right, to be admitted to a hearing in the Circuit court: but, in the former case, it would be no ground of complaint, that her application was rejected; for, she is bound by the law; and in the other case, she would be entitled to bring the subject before us, as a court of law; since she was refused the exercise of a legal right.
It is true, that, under the Federal Constitution, an inferior tribunal cannot compel a State to appear as a party; but it is at very different proposition to say, that a State cannot, by her own consent, appear in any other court, than the Supreme court. The general rule applies among all sovereigns, who, as equals, are not amenable to courts of each other; and yet I remember an action was instituted and sustained, some years ago, in the name of Louis XVI. king of France, against Mr. Robert Morris, in the Supreme court of Pennsylvania.
Under these impressions, I am disposed to think, that the State of Georgia ought rather to have sued out a writ of error, than to have asked for an injunction: But still, in the existing ​circumstances of the case, I have no objection to retain the money within the power of the court, ’till we can better satisfy ourselves both as to the remedy and the right.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia v. Evans

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
316 U.S. 159
Georgia v. Evans
Argued: April 14, 1942. --- Decided: April 27, 1942
Mr. Ellis G. Arnall, Atty. Gen., of Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner.
Mr. Edwin W. Moise, of Atlanta, Ga., for respondents.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia v. Grant

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
73 U.S. 241
Georgia v. Grant
THIS court having some time since dismissed a bill filed by the State of Georgia against Mr. Stanton, Secretary of War, General Grant, and others, on the ground that it called for a judgment on a question political in its nature, Messrs. Black and Sharkey, in behalf of the same State, asked leave to file a bill by it against Generals Grant, Meade, and others; it being stated that the bill was not open to objection from the causes which it was decided made the one dismissed objectionable.
Mr. Carpenter, in behalf of the persons named as defendants, desired to know whether it would be regular for him to oppose this motion for leave if he should, on seeing and considering the bill, desire to do so.
The CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

* ↑ See supra, ante, p. 50.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia v. Brailsford (2 U.S. 415)

2 U.S. (2 Dallas) 415 (1793)

## Dissenting Opinions

    Iredell
    Blair
Supreme Court of the United States
2 U.S. 415
The State of Georgia v. Brailsford, et al.
Argued: February 6–9, 1793 --- Decided: February 20, 1792
​Bill in equity.This cause was again brought before the Court, upon a motion by Randolph, to dissolve the Injunction, which had been issued, and to dismiss the Bill. He assigned two grounds in support of his motion:—1st. That the State of Georgia had no remedy at law to recover the Debt in question; and 2nd. That even if there was a remedy at law, there was no equitable right to justify the present form of proceeding. The motion was opposed by Ingersoll and Dallas; and after argument, the opinions of the judges (in the absence of Johnson, Justice,) were delivered as follows.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia v. Brailsford (2 U.S. 415)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Iredell Blair
​Jay, Chief Justice.All the Court, except the Judges who have just delivered their sentiments, are of opinion, that, if the State of Georgia has a right to the debt, due originally from Spalding to Brailsford, it is a right to be pursued at common law.
The bill, however, was founded in the highest equity; and the ground of equity for granting an injunction continues the same—namely, that the money ought to be kept for the party ​to whom it belongs. We shall, therefore, continue the injunction ’till the next Term; when, however, if Georgia has not instituted her action at common law, it will be dissolved.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia v. Chattanooga

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
264 U.S. 472
Georgia v. Chattanooga
Argued: on Motion to Dismiss. Dec. 3, 1923. --- Decided: April 7, 1924
Mr. Sam E. Whitaker, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for defendant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 472-474 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Geo. M. Napier, of Atlanta, Ga., and Wm. L. Frierson, of Washington, D. C., for the State of Georgia.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 475-477 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia v. Brailsford (2 U.S. 415)/Dissent Blair

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Iredell Blair
​Blair, Justice.My sentiments have coincided, ’till this moment, with the sentiments entertained by the majority of the ​Court; but a doubt has just occurred, which I think it my duty to declare.
I do not conceive, indeed, that any judgment, can be binding upon the rights and interests of a third person, who is not a party to the suit. The very nature of a bill of Interpleader pre-supposes, that the party by whom it is exhibited, would be liable a second time, if he should either voluntarily, or otherwise, pay the money which he owes, to a wrong claimant. A judgment would not, therefore, in such a case, be a bar to the action of the claimant, who is legally entitled; and who might either bring Detinue, or Trover, for the bond, against the possessor of it; or if he instituted an action of debt against the obligor, the Court might on a proper hearing, order the instrument to be delivered into his hands.
Presuming, then, that there was a remedy at law, I have hitherto thought that there was no ground for the interference of this Court, as a Court of Equity. But, upon reflection, it appears, that if Brailsford, who is a British subject, should get the money, under the present judgment, and leave the country, there would be great danger of a failure of justice. It was for this reason, that the Injunction was originally granted; and I think the reason ought to carry us still farther. Admitting that Georgia has a complete remedy at law; her right, though not supported by herself, has been stated to the Circuit Court; and though the judgment in that case is not binding upon her, yet, in any future suit brought by her against Spalding, who is bound by the judgment, a similar difficulty will arise; for, the Court would then be called upon to decide, in the absence of Brailsford (who could not be a party to the common law suit) upon his claim, as well as upon the claim of Georgia.
Since, therefore, there is no other Court, that can bring all the parties before them, and do general and complete justice, it is my opinion, that the bill in equity ought to be sustained; and that the subject should be no further referred to a Court of law, than to obtain an opinion upon the legal title to the debt in controversy.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse