OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Russell & Whitehead's Principia Mathematica

PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICA
Cambridge University Press London: Fetter Lane, E. C. C. F. Clay, Manager
Edinburgh: 100, Princes Street Berlin: A. Asher and Co. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons Bombay and Calcutta: Macmillan and Co., Ltd.
All rights reserved
PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICA
BY
ALFRED NORTH WHITEHEAD, Sc.D., F.R.S. Fellow and late Lecturer of Trinity College, Cambridge
AND
BERTRAND RUSSELL, M.A., F.R.S. Lecturer and late Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge
VOLUME I
Cambridge at the University Press 1910
Cambridge: Printed by John Clay, M.A. At the University Press
p. 14, line 2, for "states" read "allows us to infer."
p. 14, line 7, after "*3·03" insert "*1·7, *1·71, and *1·72."
p. 15, last line but one, for "function of $\scriptstyle {\phi {\hat {x}}}$" read "function $\scriptstyle {\phi {\hat {x}}}$."
p. 34, line 15, for "x" read "R."
p. 68, line 20, for "classes" read "classes of classes."
p. 86, line 2, after "must" insert "neither be nor."
p. 91, line 8, delete "and in *3·03."
p. 103, line 7, for "assumption" read "assertion."
p. 103, line 25, at end of line, for "q" read "r."
p. 218, last line but one, for "A" read "$\scriptstyle {\dot {\text{A}}}$" [owing to brittleness of the type, the same error is liable to occur elsewhere].
p. 382, last line but one, delete "in the theory of selections (*83·92) and."
p. 487, line 13, for "*95" read "*94."
p. 503, line 14, for "*88·38" read "*88·36."

## Works about

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1970, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 53 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rusk v. Cort

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Brennan
United States Supreme Court
369 U.S. 367
Rusk v. Cort
Argued: Oct. 11, 1961. --- Decided: April 2, 1962
Oscar H. Davis, Washington, D.C., for the appellant.
Leonard B. Boudin, New York City, for the appellee.
Mr. Justice STEWART delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Royal Naval Biography/Askew, Charles Crackenthorp

Layout 2
CHARLES CRACKENTHORP ASKEW, Esq. [Post-Captain of 1822.]
Son of John Askew, of Pallinsburn, co. Northumberland, Esq., by Bridget, daughter of John Watson, of Goswick, co. Durham, Esq.
This officer entered the navy Feb. 21, 1798, as midshipman, on board the Vestal frigate. Captain Charles White; and served under that officer in the expedition against Ostend, conducted by Major-General Coote and Captain Sir Home Popham. We next find him with the gallant Riou, in the Amazon 38, at the sanguinary battle of Copenhagen; during which his captain was slain, and 36 of his shipmates killed and wounded.
After the renewal of the war with France, in 1803, Mr. ​Askew, then serving in the same frigate, under Captain William Parker, assisted at the capture of le Felix privateer, of 16 guns and 96 men. He subsequently accompanied the squadron under Lord Nelson to the West Indies, in pursuit of the combined fleets; and, returning from thence, assisted in capturing the Principe de la Paz, Spanish privateer, mounting 24 long 9-pounders and 4 brass swivels, with a complement of 160 men. His first commission bears date Nov. 27, 1805.
On the 4th of the following month. Lieutenant Askew was appointed to the Dictator 64, Captain James Macnamara; and on the 30th December, 1806, he was removed from that ship to the Thalia 36, then commanded by Captain James Walker, on the Guernsey station, but afterwards by Captain Thomas Manby, and employed in protecting the Greenland fishery. While serving under the latter officer, he successively visited Davis’s Strait, the coast of Labrador, Newfoundland, the Western Islands, Cadiz, and Gibraltar. Under his successor. Captain James Giles Vashon, he served in the expedition to the Scheldt, in the year 1809. He was promoted from the Thalia, to the command of the Moselle sloop, on the Jamaica station, Nov. 26, 1811.
Captain Askew’s subsequent appointments were, June 7, 1814, to the Shamrock brig, which vessel he paid off, Oct. 9, 1815; and. May 22, 1821, to the Martin ship-sloop, fitting for the Mediterranean station, where he received his post commission, bearing date July 19, 1822.
This officer married, Feb. 13, 1828, Sarah, third daughter of the late Patrick Dickson, of White Cross, Berwickshire.
Agents.– Messrs. Maude & Co.
* ↑ See Vol. I. Part II. note at p. 713, et seq.
* ↑ See Vol. I. Part I. p. 367, et seq.
* ↑ See Vol. II. Part I. p 438, et seq.
* ↑ See id. p. 210, et seq.
# Royal Naval Biography/Athill, James

Layout 2
JAMES ATHILL, Esq. [Commander.]
Was the only son of the late Hon. Samuel Byam Athill, pro tempore commander-in-chief at Antigua. He passed his examination, and obtained a lieutenant’s commission, in June, 1809; was appointed to the Venerable 74, fitting out for the flag of Rear-Admiral (now Sir Philip C. H.) Durham, Dec. 18th, 1813; promoted to the command of the Mutine sloop, June 7th, 1814; and appointed to the Hardy, April 20th, 1815.
Commander Athill married, Nov. 8th, 1819, Selina Theresa, third daughter of the late C. Bishop, Esq. H.M. Procurator-General; and died at the island of Antigua, April 9th, 1825.
# Royal Naval Biography/Astle, George

Layout 2
GEORGE ASTLE, Esq [Post-Captain of 1798.]
This officer was made a Lieutenant in 1794; and obtained post rank Aug. 27, 1798. During the remainder of the war he commanded la Virginie frigate, in the East Indies, where he took several prizes, and among others captured three Dutch vessels of war, mounting in the whole 32 guns. He returned to England Feb. 14, 1803.
Agent.– ___
# Royal Naval Biography/Austin, Horatio Thomas

Layout 2
HORATIO THOMAS AUSTIN, Esq. [Commander.]
Entered the royal navy in 1813; obtained his first commission on the 9th Sept. 1822; was appointed to the Chanticleer sloop, Dec. 12th, 1827; and promoted to his present rank May 26th, 1831. His subsequent appointments were, Nov. 27th, 1832, to the Salamander; and, Jan. 30th, 1834, to the Medea (steam-ships); in the former of which he escorted Donna Maria to Portugal, in 1833; and in the latter attended Queen Adelaide to Holland, in July 1834. Since then he has visited all the ports on the north coast of Spain, from Bilboa to Coruna.
# Royal Naval Biography/Arthur, William Stephens

Layout 2
WILLIAM STEPHENS ARTHUR, Esq. [Commander.]
Was made a lieutenant on the 6th Feb. 1821; and commander Oct. 11th, 1824.
# Royal Naval Biography/Atkinson, Henry Esch

Layout 2
HENRY ESCH ATKINSON, Esq. [Commander.]
This officer passed his examination in July 1813, at which period he was a midshipman of the Vigo 74. He obtained the rank of lieutenant on the 16th Feb. 1815; and subsequently served in the Bacchus 16, Commander William Hill; Brazen 26, Captain William Shepheard, on the Cape of Good Hope station, from whence he returned home invalided in 1820; Queen Charlotte 108, flag-ship of Sir James Hawkins Whitshed, commander-in-chief at Portsmouth; and Britomart 10, Commander Octavius V. Vernon, on the Jamaica station. He was appointed a supernumerary lieutenant of the Hyperion 42, coast guard depot, at Newhaven, Aug. 23d, 1825; removed to the Weazle sloop. Commander John Dundas, fitting out at Portsmouth, Mar. 9th, 1827; and advanced to his present rank on the 30th of the following month.
# Russell & Whitehead's Principia Mathematica/Part 2

* Summary of Part 2
* Section A
* Section B
* Section C
* Section D
* Section E
# Russell & Whitehead's Principia Mathematica/Part 1

* Summary of Part 1
* Section A
* Section B
* Section C
* Section D
* Section E
# Russell Bucklew v. Anne L. Precythe, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections/Concurrence Kavanaugh

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 17–8151
RUSSELL BUCKLEW, PETITIONER v. ANNE L. PRECYTHE, DIRECTOR, MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT [April 1, 2019]
Justice Kavanaugh, concurring.
When an inmate raises an as-applied constitutional challenge to a particular method of execution—that is, a challenge to a method of execution that is constitutional in general but that the inmate says is very likely to cause him severe pain—one question is whether the inmate must identify an available alternative method of execution that would significantly reduce the risk of severe pain. Applying our recent decisions in Glossip v. Gross, 576 U. S. ___ (2015), and Baze v. Rees, 553 U. S. 35 (2008) (plurality opinion), the Court’s answer to that question is yes. Under those precedents, I agree with the Court’s holding and join the Court’s opinion.
I write to underscore the Court’s additional holding that the alternative method of execution need not be authorized under current state law—a legal issue that had been uncertain before today’s decision. See Arthur v. Dunn, 580 U. S. ___, ___–___ (2017) (slip op., at 9–11) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari). Importantly, all nine Justices today agree on that point. Ante, at 19; post, at 14 (Breyer, J., dissenting).
As the Court notes, it follows from that additional holding that the burden of the alternative-method requirement “can be overstated.” Ante, at 19. Indeed, the Court ​states: “[W]e see little likelihood that an inmate facing a serious risk of pain will be unable to identify an available alternative.” Ante, at 20.
In other words, an inmate who contends that a particular method of execution is very likely to cause him severe pain should ordinarily be able to plead some alternative method of execution that would significantly reduce the risk of severe pain. At oral argument in this Court, the State suggested that the firing squad would be such an available alternative, if adequately pleaded. Tr. of Oral Arg. 63–64 (“He can plead firing squad…. Of course, if he had… pleaded firing squad, it’s possible that Missouri could have executed him by firing squad”). Justice Sotomayor has likewise explained that the firing squad is an alternative method of execution that generally causes an immediate and certain death, with close to zero risk of a botched execution. See Arthur, 580 U. S., at ___–___ (slip op., at 17–18). I do not here prejudge the question whether the firing squad, or any other alternative method of execution, would be a feasible and readily implemented alternative for every State. See McGehee v. Hutchinson, 854 F. 3d 488, 493–494 (CA8 2017). Rather, I simply emphasize the Court’s statement that “we see little likelihood that an inmate facing a serious risk of pain will be unable to identify an available alternative.” Ante, at 20.
# Short Stories from the Balkans

* related portals: Collective works.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
SHORT STORIES FROM THE BALKANS
TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH
BY
EDNA WORTHLEY UNDERWOOD
BOSTON
Marshall Jones Company
MDCCCCXIX
COPYRIGHT·1919
BY MARSHALL JONES COMPANY
THE·PLIMPTON·PRESS
NORWOOD·MASS·U. S. A.
DEDICATED TO MY FATHER ALBERT WORTHLEY
CONTENTS
page
From the Czech of Yaroslav Vrchlický
A Story of the Montenegran Boundary by A. von Vestendorf
From the Rumanian of J. L. Caragiale
From the Czech of Savatopluk Čech
From the Czech of Jan Neruda
From the Czech of Jan Neruda
From the Serbian of Lazar K. Lazarevic
From the Croatian of Xaver Šandor-Gjalski
From the Croatian of Xaver Šandor-Gjalski
A Story of the Late War by Joachim Friedenthal
From the Hungarian of Koloman Mikszáth
From the Hungarian of Koloman Miksz th
A Tale of the Balkan Mountains by Walther Netto
# Rodriquez v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
395 U.S. 327
Adolpho RODRIQUEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
Argued: March 26, 1969. --- Decided: June 2, 1969
William R. Wallace, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
Beatrice Rosenberg, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rodriguez v. Colorado

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
498 U.S. 1055
Rodriguez v. Colorado
No. 90-6371
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Colorado.
The application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice WHITE and by him referred to the Court is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
Justice MARSHALL, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Russian Novelists (1887)

This book was a historically important work, establishing the grounds for further international research of the Russian literature, and introducing such a major author as Fyodor Dostoevsky.
THE
RUSSIAN NOVELISTS
BY
E M de VOGÜÉ
TRANSLATED BY
JANE LORING EDMANDS
BOSTON D LOTHROP COMPANY FRANKLIN AND HAWLEY STREETS
Copyright, 1887,
BY D. LOTHROP COMPANY.
Electrotyped By C. J. Peters and Son, Boston.
CONTENTS.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Rowan v. United States Post Office Department/Concurrence Brennan

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Wikipedia article
United States Supreme Court
397 U.S. 728
Rowan v. United States Post Office Department
Argued: Jan. 22, 1970 --- Decided: May 4, 1970
​Mr. Justice Brennan, with whom Mr. Justice Douglas joins, concurring.
I join the Court’s opinion but add a few words. I agree that 39 U. S. C. § 4009 (1964 ed., Supp. IV) is constitutional insofar as it permits an addressee to require a mailer to remove his name from its mailing lists and to stop all future mailings to the addressee. As the Court notes, however, subsection (g) of § 4009 also allows an addressee to request the Postmaster General to include in any prohibitory order “the names of any of his minor children who have not attained their nineteenth birthday, and who reside with the addressee.” In light of the broad interpretation that the Court assigns to § 4009, and see ante, at 738, the possibility exists that parents could prevent their children, even if they are 18 years old, from receiving political, religious, or other materials that the parents find offensive. Cf. Tinker v. Des Moines School Dist., 393 U. S. 503 (1969); Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U. S. 629 (1968). In this case, however, there is no particularized attack upon the constitutionality of subsection (g), nor, indeed, is there any indication on this record that under § 4009(g) children in their late teens have been unwillingly deprived of the opportunity to receive materials. In these circumstances, I understand the Court to leave open the question of the right of older children to receive materials through the mail without governmental interference and also the more specific question whether § 4009(g) may constitutionally be applied with respect to all materials and to all children under 19.
# Rowdy of the "Cross L"

[c. 1906] Rowland "Rowdy" Vaughan meets—and falls in love with—Jessie Conroy—all in one short period of time. But there are obstacles, and other cowboy problems to attend to.
| “ | "For fear you may think I'm a—a robber-woman," she answered him solemnly—he felt sure her eyes twinkled, if only he could have seen them—"I'm Jessie Conroy. And if you're from over the line, maybe you know my brother Harry. He was over there a year or two." Rowdy hunched his shoulders—presumably at the wind. Harry Conroy's sister, was she? And he swore. "I may have met him," he parried, in a tone you'd never notice as being painstakingly careless. "I think I did, come to think of it." Miss Conroy seemed displeased, and presently the cause was forthcoming. "If you'd ever met him," she said, "you'd hardly forget him." (Rowdy mentally agreed profanely.) "He's the best rider in the whole country—and the handsomest. He—he's splendid! And he's the only brother I've got. It's a pity you never got acquainted with him." | ” |
Layout 4
ROWDY OF THE "CROSS L."
ROWDY OF THE "CROSS L"
CONTENTS
CHAPTER PAGE
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1940, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 83 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Row, Row, Row Your Boat

Row, row, row your boat,  Gently down the stream.  Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily,  Life is but a dream.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rowan and Harris v. Runnels/Dissent Daniel

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Daniel
United States Supreme Court
46 U.S. 134
Rowan and Harris v. Runnels
Mr. Justice DANIEL dissented.
From the decision of the court pronounced in these causes, I feel myself constrained to dissent. The rule heretofore announced and uniformly observed by this court, with respect to the construction to be given to the constitutions and statutes of the several States, has been this:-that the interpretations put upon those constitutions and statutes by the supreme tribunals of the States respectively, should be received and followed as the true interpretation. This rule, so reasonable in itself, so inseparable from every idea of the competency, or indeed the very being of the systems of which those constitutions and statutes make an essential part, is not even now denied; but whilst it is, in general terms, assented to in the decision of these causes, it is in effect, if not in terms, by the same decision utterly overthrown. In the case of Groves et al. v. Slaughter, 15 Pet., 449, this court, as it was constrained to do in the absence of any interpretation by the State courts, gave its own construction to the constitution of Mississippi. Since the decision in Groves v. Slaughter, decisions of the Supreme Court of Mississippi, giving an interpretation to the constitution of that State, have become generally known,-they are familiar, unequivocal, uniform, numerous. That any or all of these expositions may have been made posterior to the decision of the cause of Groves v. Slaughter, I hold to be perfectly immaterial, so far as this circumstance can affect their force and validity. If these expositions establish the meaning of the constitution of Mississippi, such meaning must have relation to the period of the consummation of that instrument. The constitution has always been the same thing from the time of its adoption. It could not have been some other thing than the constitution, because it had not been interpreted to this court, and subsequently have become the constitution merely because its interpretation was then generally declared. The decision of the causes now before this court gives to the constitution of Mississippi different meanings at different periods of its existence, and deduces those meanings from circumstances wholly unconnected with the intrinsic signification of the terms of the instrument itself. Such a rule of interpretation involves, in my view, a contradiction which I am wholly unwilling to adopt.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sarawak Gazette 4 January 1907 Issue No 492/Meteorological Readings

METEOROLOGICAL READINGS.
Kuching Observatory.
Observations Taken Daily at 8 a.m. December, 1906.
| Total rainfall during the month | 18.24 inches |
| Highest recorded temperature | 90.3 °F |
| Lowest recorded„ temperature„ | 71.9 °F |
| Height of observatory above sea level approximately 100 feet. ||
Kuching:—Printed and Published by Ghin Heng Soon, Government Printer, at the Sarawak Gazette Office, No. 19, 20, and 21, Court House Road.
# Sarawak Gazette 4 January 1907 Issue No 492/Orders

Order.
No. XIII, 1906.
Whereas His Excellency The Governor of the Straits Settlements has notified the Sarawak Government that it is his intention to shortly issue an order prohibiting the exportation of Straits dollars to all places except to Sarawak, British North Borneo and the Malay Peninsula, and whereas His Excellency has requested that this Government will assist by taking all possible steps to prevent the exportation of Straits dollars from Sarawak to China or elsewhere, it is hereby enacted:—
That from date of this Order the exportation of Straits ollars to any place outside Sarawak except to the Straits Settlements or British North Borneo is forbidden and any person disobeying this Order will be punished by fine or imprisonment.
By Order P. F. CUNYNGHAME, Resident 1st Division. Administering the Government of Sarawak.
Resident's Office, Kuching, Sarawak, 24th October, 1906.
Order.
No. XIV, 1906.
The following is to be added to the table of fares for hire of Jiurickshas, Order No. I of 26th February 1896.
If engaged by time For every hour .... 25 cents. For every additional 1/4 hour .... 6 cents.
P. F. CUNYNGHAME, Resident 1st Division.
Resident's Office, Sarawak, 5th November 1906.
# Sarawak Gazette 4 January 1907 Issue No 492/Passengers

PASSENGERS.
Arrivals.
Per s. s. Kuching:— From Singapore, 6th December, Messrs. R. Pawle, A. C. Vivian and the Rev. J. Oss.
Per s. s. Sarawak:— From Muka, 6th December, Miss Dobson.
Per s. s. Rajah of Sarawak:— From Singapore, 13th December, Mr. G. Malcolm.
Per s. s. Adeh:— From Limbang and Brooketon. 22nd December, Mr. and Mrs. T. Nicoll and Mr. G. Dalton.
Per s. s. Rajah of Sarawak:— From Singapore, 28th December. Dr. A. J. G. Barker, Dr. Bruce Low, Dr. Schleehter, Messrs. J. S. Geikie, J. H. Johnston, H. la Chard and Miss Hastie.
Per p. s. Adeh:—From Sibu, 29th December, Rev. Father Halder.
Per p. s. Kaka:—From Sadong, 30th December. Mr. P. Stewart.
Depatures.
Per p. s. Kuching:—For Singapore, 11th December, Miss Dobson, Mr. and Mrs. A. G. Butler.
Per p. s. Kaka:—For Brooketon, and Limbang, 16th December, Mr. G. Dalton.
Per s. s. Rajah of Sarawak:— For Singapore, 18th December, Messrs. Malcolm and J. H. Johnston.
Per s. s. Sarawak:—For Sibu, 19th December, Mr. V. Harington and the Revd. J. Oss.
Per s. s. Kuching:—For Singapore, 26th December, Mr. and Mrs. T. Nicoll.
Per p. s. Kaka:—For Sadong, 20th December, Mr. P Stewart.
C. C. ROBISON.
# Sarawak Gazette 4 January 1907 Issue No 492/Appointments

APPOINTMENTS.
His Highness the Rajah has been pleased to make the following appointments:—
Herbert La Chard Esq. to be a Cadet, and to do duty in Upper Sarawak at Bau, to date 28th December 1906.
Dr. Robert Bruce Low to be Assistant Medical Officer, to date from 28th December 1906.
Miss A. Hastie to the Medical Department as Nurse, to date from 28th December 1906.
H. B. Crocker Esq. Assistant Resident, to do duty in the Resident's Office. Kuching, to date from 8th January 1907.
# Sarawak Gazette 4 January 1907 Issue No 492/Leave

LEAVE.
Dr. A. J. G. Barker, Principal Medical Officer, returned from leave on 28th December 1906, and has resumed his duties.
# Sarawak Gazette 4 January 1907 Issue No 492/Almanac

THE "SARAWAK GAZETTE" ALMANAC.
JANUARY, 1907.