OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Mathews v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
123 U.S. 182
Mathews v. United States
There is no foundation for appellant's claim. In U.S. v. Langston, 118 U.S. 389, 394, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1185, we said that 'a statute fixing the annual salary of a public officer at a named sum, without limitation as to time, should not be deemed abrogated or suspended by subsequent enactments which merely appropriated a less amount for the services of that officer for particular fiscal years, and which contained no words that expressly, or by clear implication, modified or repealed the previous law.' The present case does not come within that rule; for the consular appropriation acts for the fiscal years ending June 30, 1883, 1884, 1885, and 1886, while recognizing the division made by the act of 1874 of consulates into classes, put the office of consul at Tangier in 'Class 5, at $2,000 per annum.' In other words, during the whole period covered by the claim in suit, the consul at Tangier was in the fifth class, and there was in force an act of congress declaring that consuls of that class should receive $2,000 per annum; in other words, that sum should be in full compensation for his services each year. The only possible object of transferring the office of consul at Tangier from the third to the fifth class was to reduce the annual salary of that officer to the sum fixed for the annual salaries of consuls of the latter class. The error in the argument in behalf of the appellant is that he gives no effect whatever to the words 'at $2,000 per annum,' to be found in every appropriation act covering the period in question. But, clearly, those acts, placing this consul in the fifth class, at $2,000 per annum, repealed, by necessary implication, so much of previous enactments, including that of June 11, 1874, as placed the consul at Tangier in the third class, at $3,000 per annum. The argument to the contrary is not at all aided by the circumstance that the diplomatic and consular appropriation act of March 3, 1887, for the first time after the passage of the act of June 11, 1874, expressly declared that the sums thereby appropriated should be 'in full compensation' for the services therein mentioned. That act was passed after the decision in Langston's Case, and the words 'in full compensation' were introduced therein, out of abundant caution, to preclude any doubt in the future as to the intention of congress.
Judgment affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mathewson v. Clarke

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
47 U.S. 122
Mathewson v. Clarke

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mathews v. McStea/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
87 U.S. 646
Mathews v. McStea
We are of opinion that the only question made and decided in this case against plaintiff in error was the sufficiency of the acts of the President to inaugurate a war which would render invalid this contract, and that this is one of the questions embraced by the act of February 5th, 1867.
The motion to dismiss is, therefore,
OVERRULED.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mathias Sandorf

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
Published by George Munro, New York in the Seaside Library, 1885.

## Table of Contents

In the Munro edition, several of Verne's chapters were split into two separate chapters. The added chapter breaks are retained, and marked ★★ in below. To facilitate comparison with the French, broken chapters will be placed on a single sub-page. Also, parts III, IV and V were published as a single part by Munro.
Part I
* Chapter I: THE CARRIER-PIGEON.
* Chapter II: THE PIGEON'S HOME. ★★
* Chapter III: COUNT SANDORF.
* Chapter IV: TORONTHAL'S BANK.
* Chapter V: THE MESSAGE IN CIPHER.
* Chapter VI: CAN THE CIPHER BE SOLVED? ★★
* Chapter VII: THE TRIAL.
* Chapter VIII: AFTER THE SENTENCE. ★★
* Chapter IX: THE DONJON OF PISINO.
* Chapter X: DOWN THE BRICO. ★★
* Chapter XI: ALONG THE FOIBA.
* Chapter XII: THE RUINED FARM. ★★
* Chapter XIII: THE FISHERMAN'S HUT.
* Chapter XIV: CARPENA'S OFFER. ★★
* Chapter XV: THE FINAL EFFORT OF THE FINAL STRUGGLE.
Part II
* Chapter I: PESCADE AND MATIFOU.
* Chapter II: THE LAUNCH OF THE TRABACOLO.
* Chapter III: DOCTOR ANTEKIRTT.
* Chapter IV: THE YOUNG RECRUITS. ★★
* Chapter V: THE WIDOW OF STEPHEN BATHORY.
* Chapter VI: ON BOARD THE “SAVARENA.”
* Chapter VII: THE DOCTOR'S DILEMMA. ★★
* Chapter VIII: THE MOUTHS OF THE CATTARO.
* Chapter IX: COMPLICATIONS.
* Chapter X: ANOTHER BLOW. ★★
* Chapter XI: A MEETING IN THE STRADONE.
Part III
* Chapter I: THE MEDITERRANEAN.
* Chapter II: “PAST AND PRESENT.”
* Chapter III: THE PRESENT. ★★
* Chapter IV: EVENTS AT RAGUSA.
* Chapter V: THE DOCTOR DELAYS.
* Chapter VI: OFF MALTA. ★★
* Chapter VII: MALTA.
* Chapter VIII: THE SPY IN THE MANDERAGGIO. ★★
* Chapter IX: THE ENVIRONS OF CATANIA.
* Chapter X: THE CASA DEGLI INGLESI.
* Chapter XI: THE FIGHT ON MOUNT ETNA. ★★
Part IV (Part III continued in Munro.)
* Chapter XII: CEUTA.
* Chapter XIII: THE MEETING AT GIBRALTAR.
* Chapter XIV: THE DOCTOR'S EXPERIMENT. ★★
* Chapter XV: SEVENTEEN TIMES.
* Chapter XVI: THE LAST STAKE.
* Chapter XVII: A CHECK FOR SARCANY. ★★
* Chapter XVIII: THE EXAMINATION OF TORONTHAL.
* Chapter XIX: BORIK'S LETTER. ★★
* Chapter XX: THE APPARITION.
Part V (Part III continued in Munro.)
* Chapter XXI: A SQUEEZE FROM CAPE MATIFOU.
* Chapter XXII: THE HOUSE AT TETUAN. ★★
* Chapter XXIII: THE FEAST OF THE STORKS.
* Chapter XXIV: THE HOUSE OF SIDI HAZAM.
* Chapter XXV: ANTEKIRTTA.
* Chapter XXVI: THE BATTLE. ★★
* Chapter XXVII: JUSTICE.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 147/Issue 1897/East London

'Twas August, and the fierce sun overhead Smote on the squalid streets of Bethnal Green, And the pale weaver, through his windows seen In Spitalfields, looked thrice dispirited; I met a preacher there I knew, and said: "Ill and o'erworked, how fare you in this scene?" "Bravely!" said he, "for I of late have been Much cheered with thoughts of Christ, the living bread." O human soul! so long as thou canst so Set up a mark of everlasting light Above the howling senses' ebb and flow, To cheer thee, and to right thee if thou roam, Not with lost toil thou labourest through the night! Thou mak'st the heaven thou hop'st indeed thy home.
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 146/Issue 1886/Gruyere Cheese

Originally published in Cowkeeper and Dairyman's Journal.
Perhaps the most justly celebrated cheese made on the Continent of Europe is the Swiss Gruyère. This is made mostly in huts, called chalets, high up among the Alps, at the time during which the pastures on the mountain-sides are accessible, and the huts habitable, say, from the melting of the snow in May to the end of September, when men and animals descend for the winter into the sheltered valleys thousands of feet below. The châlets are located in the midst of the mountain pastures on a spot safe from avalanches, and generally near to a small pond or spring of water, when such are available. Provisions from the valleys are carried up weekly to the châlets, and it is under such difficult and romantic circumstances that a cheese is made which for hundreds of years has been considered almost, if not quite, the best on the Continent. The milk, partly skimmed, or not, according to the quality of cheese desired to be made, is put into a great kettle and swung on a crane over a gentle fire, where it is allowed to attain a temperature of 77 degrees Fahr., when the kettle is swung off the fire and rennet is added to the milk. When coagulation has advanced far enough, the curd is cut into as fine pieces as is practicable with the large wooden knife which is used for the purpose. The kettle is then swung over the fire again, and the curd is taken up in small quantities in a porringer, and poured back through the fingers, whereby it is still more finely divided. Great importance is attached to this division of the curd, in order that each particle may he fully exposed to the action of the heat in the “cooking” process, which ensues up to a point when a temperature of 90 degrees has been attained. The kettle is then immediately swung off the fire, and the waste of curd and whey stirred for some fifteen minutes longer; and if the cooking has been properly performed, the particles of curd have the appearance of bursted grains of rice swimming in the whey. The curd is then collected in a cloth, and great care is taken to expel all the whey. The salting of the cheese is also considered a delicate and important process. The salt is rubbed, from time to time, on the outside of the cheese, care being taken to discern when enough shall have been absorbed. The Gruyère cheeses are commonly three feet in diameter, and weigh over one hundred pounds. A successful cheese of this kind is like a soft yellow paste, which melts in the mouth, and it is filled with cavities about the size of a pea, one or two, say, in each square inch of cheese.
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 147/Issue 1896/Worldly Place

Even in a palace, life may be led well! So spake the imperial sage, purest of men, Marcus Aurelius. But the stifling den Of common life, where, crowded up pell-mell, Our freedom for a little bread we sell, And drudge under some foolish master's ken Who rates us if we peer outside our pen — Matched with a palace, is not this a hell? Even in a palace! On his truth sincere, Who spoke these words, no shadow ever came; And when my ill-schooled spirit is aflame Some nobler, ampler stage of life to win, I'll stop, and say: "There were no succour here! The aids to noble life are all within."
# Maxwell v. Newbold

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
59 U.S. 511
Maxwell v. Newbold
THIS case was brought up from the supreme court of the State of Michigan, by a writ of error issued under the 25th section of the judiciary act.
The facts are fully set forth in the opinion of the court.
It was argued by Mr. Lawrence and Mr. Haven, for the plaintiffs in error, and Mr. Cushing, (attorney general,) for the defendants.
Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Maxwell v. Stewart/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
88 U.S. 71
Maxwell v. Stewart
On examining the record we find that four errors were assigned in the court below. The first three relate to the form and sufficiency of the evidence offered to prove the record of the judgment in the District Court of the State of Kansas upon which the action was brought. We think the objections were not well taken and that there was no error in overruling them.
The fourth in to the effect that the judgment in the Kansas court was void because the cause was tried by the court without the waiver of a trial by jury entered upon the journal. Whatever might be the effect of this omission in a proceeding to obtain a reversal or vacation of the judgment, it is very certain that it does not render the judgment void. At most it is only error and cannot be taken advantage of collaterally.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
A motion was afterwards made by Mr. J. S. Watts, for the plaintiff in error, to rehear the case; but the motion was denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# May's Account of Her Introduction to the Art of Love

Appeared in the May to December 1880 editions of The Pearl

## Contents

* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
This work was published before January 1, 1929 and is anonymous or pseudonymous due to unknown authorship. It is in the public domain in the United States as well as countries and areas where the copyright terms of anonymous or pseudonymous works are 95 years or less since publication.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Maxwell v. Stewart

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
88 U.S. 71
Maxwell v. Stewart
ERROR to the Supreme Court of the Territory of New Mexico.
Stewart brought an action in a State court of Kansas against Maxwell. The writ was returned, 'Not served.' Thereupon an attachment was issued and levied on his property. A bond was then entered into by which the property was released.
The judgment entry recited that 'the plaintiff appeared by his attorney, J. C. Henningray, and the defendant by his attorneys, John Martin and Isaac Sharp, and both parties announcing themselves ready,' the trial proceeded.
On the record of this judgment Stewart subsequently sued Maxwell in the Territory of New Mexico, the clerk of the court in Kansas certifying that the record 'was a true and faithful copy of the record of the proceedings had in the said court in the said cause;' the cause, namely, in Kansas. Three pleas were put in, alleging certain irregularities and deficiencies in the said record, and also a plea that the judgment was void as the record showed that the case had been tried without a jury. There was no plea alleging that the attorneys who were represented by the record of the judgment to have appeared for the defendant were not authorized to appear.
All the pleas were overruled, a judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, and on appeal to the Supreme Court of the Territory, where the overruling of the pleas was assigned for error, the judgment was affirmed. The defendant now brought the case here.
It may be well to state that by the statute of Kansas, it is provided that in actions on contracts the trial by jury may be waived, by written consent, or 'by oral consent in open court, entered on the journal.' There was no appearance in this court by the plaintiffs in error and no errors had been here assigned. The court accordingly, on the case being called, were about to dismiss the writ. Mr. P. Phillips, for the defendant in error, however, opened the record and prayed an affirmance of the judgment.
The CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

* Acts of 1868, p. 684, § 289.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Griffiths, George Summers

​Griffiths, George Summers, a member of the Oxford circuit, a student of the Middle Temple 23 April, 1849, called to the bar 7 May, 1852 (3rd son of Lewis Griffiths, Esq., of Marle Hill, Cheltenham, co. Gloucester); born , ; married 6 June, 1854, E Lucy, only dau. of late Henry Harvey, of the Brazils.
    1, Cloisters, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Griffiths, Evan Evans Francis

​Griffiths, Evan Evans Francis, matric. London Univ. 1869, certificate of honour and prizeman in Roman law and jurisprudence 1871, a member of the South Wales circuit, a student of the Middle Temple 28 April, 1871, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1874 (eldest son of Evan Jones Griffiths, of Abercarn, co. Mon., estate agent); born 16 May, 1848; unmarried.
    Penarth, Cardiff; Cwmdulas, Garth, Brecon; 2, Pump Court, Temple, E.C.; National Liberal Club.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Griffiths, Richard Foulkes

​Griffiths, Richard Foulkes, matric. London Univ. 1870, a student of the Inner Temple 26 June, 1876 (then aged 26), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1879 (eldest son of John Griffiths, of Llangollen, co. Denbigh); born , 1850.
    Tarporley, Cheshire.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Griffiths, William Russell

​Griffiths, William Russell, LL.B., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1867, a member of the Midland circuit, joint editor of Cooke's Treatise on Law and Practice of Agricultural Tenancies, author of Agricultural Holdings Act 1883, a student of the Inner Temple 22 Nov., 1865 (then aged 20), called to the bar 30 April, 1869 (4th son of George Richard Griffiths, Esq., of Castle Hill, Egham, Surrey, dec.); born , 1845.
    207, Piccadilly, W.; 3, Essex Court, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Griffits, James Olliff

​Griffits, James Olliff, Q.C., recorder of Reading since 1870, a member of the Oxford circuit, contested Great Marlow 1880, J.P. High Wycombe, a student of the Middle Temple 3 June, 1845, called to the bar 16 June, 1848, Q.C. 25 June, 1875, bencher 30 Jan., 1878 (6th son of John Griffits, of High Wycombe, Bucks); born 21 Feb., 1821; married 2ndly, 23 Dec., 1884, Jane, 3rd dau. of R. Whall Cooke, Esq., of Brighton.
    The Priory, High Wycombe, Bucks; 5, Crown Office Row, Temple, E.C; Orleans and National Liberal Clubs.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Griffiths, John Harward

​Griffiths, John Harward, B.C.L., Univ. Coll., Oxon, 1848, S.C.L. 1844, late hon. major Herefordshire militia, D.L. Hereford city, J.P. Herefordshire (high sheriff 1877) and Staffordshire, a student of Lincoln's Inn 24 Jan., 1843 (then aged 20), called to the bar 5 May, 1848 (eldest son of John Griffiths, Esq., of the Weir, co. Hereford); born , 1822; married 2 April, 1872, Hon. Emily Wingfield, widow of Thomas Guy Osborne, Esq., of Yoxall Lodge, co. Stafford, dau. of Frederick, 13th Lord Saye and Sele (see Foster's Peerage).
    Yoxall Lodge, Burton-on-Trent; The Weir, Hereford; Conservative Club.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Griffiths, Richard John

​Griffiths, Richard John, major late Worcestershire militia, J.P., D.L. co. Hereford, lord of the manor of Lugwardine, a student of Lincoln's Inn 22 May, 1840 (then aged 23), called to the bar 10 June, 1845 (2nd son of Edward Griffiths, Esq., of Newcourt, co. Hereford); born , 1816; married , 1843, Harriet Anne Isabella, only dau. of late Fowler Price, Esq., of Huntington Court, co. Hereford, and has a dau.
    Newcourt, Hereford; Beaconsfield Club, S.W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Griffiths, Robert Jones

​Griffiths, Robert Jones, M.A., St. John's Coll., Camb., 1879, LL.B., B.A. 1876, editor of Glasgow daily paper, a student of the Middle Temple 12 Oct., 1877, called to the bar 17 Nov., 1883 (only son of Robert Griffiths, of Llanrug, co. Carnarvon, schoolmaster); born , .
    2, Vinicombe Street, Hillhead, Glasgow; 25, Old Square, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Griffiths, William

​Griffiths, William, M.A., St. John's Coll., Camb., 1868, principal Hooghly Coll., Bengal, a student of the Middle Temple 6 Nov., 1863, called to the bar 6 June, 1866 (6th son of David Griffiths, of Dryshoyn-Fawr, co. Carmarthen, farmer); born , ; married 20 Feb., 1871, Mary Ann, 2nd dau. of Rev. J. S. F. Gabb, of Charlton King's, near Cheltenham.
    Hooghly College, Calcutta.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Grigg, John Williams

​Grigg, John Williams, J.P. Devon, a student of the Middle Temple 3 Nov., 1849, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1853 (eldest son of Mark Stephens Grigg, of Plymouth, distiller); born 20 Nov., 1830; married 28 Aug., 1861, Charlotte Katherine, eldest dau. of E. B. Mills, Esq., of Mannamead, Devon, late Bombay C.S.
    Heathfield, Tamerton Foliot, Devon.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Motabhoy, Navrosjee Rastomjee

​Motabhoy, Navrosjee Rastomjee, practises before the High Court at Bombay, a student of the Middle Temple 5 June, 1875, called to the bar 15 May, 1878 (only son ot Rastomjee Navrosjee Motabhoy, of Bombay, merchant, dec.); born , 1844.
    Bombay.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Motte, William Radley Standish

​Motte, William Radley Standish, a student of Lincoln's Inn 26 May, 1832 (then aged 23), went to the Middle Temple 26 May, 1836, where he was called to the bar 10 June, 1836 (eldest son of William Radley Motte, Esq., of Brighton); born , 1809.
    Brighton.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Mote, Frederick

​Mote, Frederick, M.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1884, B.A., LL.B. 18S0, matric. London Univ. 1873, a student of the Inner Temple 13 April, 1877 (then aged 21), called to the bar 21 April, 1880 (4th son of James Mote, of London, solicitor); born , 1856.
    7, Crown Office Row, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Moulton, John

​Moulton, John, M.A. Pembroke Coll., Oxon, a student of Lincoln's Inn 24 Nov., 1860 (then aged 20), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1864 (youngest son of Stephen Moulton, Esq., of Kingston House, Bradford, Wilts); born , 1840.
    Kingston House, Bradford-on-Avon; 7. New Square, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.; New University Club, S.W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Mott, Albert

​Mott, Albert, B.A. London Univ. 1843 and a member of Convocation, a student of the Middle Temple 20 Jan., 1844, called to the bar 11 June, 1847 (3rd son of Richard Mott, Esq., of London); born , ; married 28 Feb., 1867, Emma, youngest dau. of Henry Fielder, Esq., of London.
    8, Old Square, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Mott, Marcus William

​Mott, Marcus William, M.D. St. Andrews, late a surgeon in Bengal army, a student of Lincoln's Inn 19 Jan., 1869 (then aged 38), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1871 (3rd son of Charles Mott, Esq., late of Church Stretton, Salop, dec.); born , 1831.
    Oriental Club, W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Moullin, William Hilary Baliol

​Moullin, William Hilary Baliol, B.A., Wadham Coll., Oxon. 1867, a student of Lincoln's Inn 27 Jan., 1865 (then aged 20), called to the bar 27 Jan., 1868 (eldest son of William Baliol Moullin, Esq., late of the island of Guernsey, dec.); born , 1848.
    Clifton, Guernsey.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Mosse, Benjamin Forbes

​Mosse, Benjamin Forbes, a member of the South-eastern circuit, a student of the Middle Temple 20 Jan., 1843, called to the bar 20 April, 1848 (eldest son of Thomas Mosse, Esq., of Knockfinne, Queen's Co.); born , .
    Folkestone Road, Dover.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Moulsdale, Robert Owen

​Moulsdale, Robert Owen, B.A., Jesus Coll., Oxon, 1865, a member of the North Wales and Chester circuit, J.P. co. Denbigh, a student of the Middle Temple 16 April, 1866, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1869 (only son of Robert Owen Moulsdale, Esq., of Bryndyffryn, co. Denbigh); born , 1842.
    Bryndyffryn, Llanwrst, co. Denbigh; 1, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Moulton, John Fletcher

​Moulton, John Fletcher, F.R.S., M.A., Christ Coll., Camb. (fellow and lecturer) 1871, B.A. St. John's Coll. 1868, M.A. London Univ. 1868 and a member of Convocation, a member of the South-eastern circuit, a student of the Middle Temple 4 Nov., 1868, called to the bar 17 Nov., 1874 (3rd son of James Egan Moulton); born , ; married 24 April, 1875, Clara, widow of R. W. Thompson, Esq., of Edinburgh.
    74 Onslow Gardens, S.W.; 11, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.
# Marmion/Canto Fifth/Introduction

INTRODUCTION TO CANTO FIFTH.
TO GEORGE ELLIS, ESQ.
# Marmion

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, quotes, Wikidata item.
First published in 1808, this transcription is of an edition of 1889.
Clarendon Press Series
SCOTT'S MARMION
BAYNE
London
HENRY FROWDE
New York
MACMILLAN AND CO.
Clarendon Press Series
SCΟΤΤ
MARMION
EDITED
WITH INTRODUCTION AND NOTES
BY
THOMAS BAYNE
Oxford
AT THE CLARENDON PRESS
1889
[All rights reserved]
* Epigram
* Dedication
* Advertisement
* Editor's Preface
* Introduction to Canto First
* Canto First
* Introduction to Canto Second
* Canto Second
* Introduction to Canto Third
* Canto Third
* Introduction to Canto Fourth
* Canto Fourth
* Introduction to Canto Fifth
* Canto Fifth
* Introduction to Canto Sixth
* Canto Sixth
* L'Envoy
* Notes
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse