OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Hansard of Parliament of the United Kingdom (1963) - Malaysia Bill/Clause 4

​Clause 4.—(POWER TO MAKE CONSEQUENTIAL PROVISIONS.)
HC Deb 19 July 1963 vol 681 c1008
    Question proposed, That the Clause stand part of the Bill.
Mr. Brockway On this Clause I will raise the question of the Orders in Council. As I understand it, the Secretary of State, prior to our consideration of the Bill, indicated that Her Majesty had placed in the hands of the House, as in the terms of this Bill, the endorsement of an Order in Council. What I am really asking is whether the House will have an opportunity of discussing the Orders in Council prior to their taking effect, or even subsequently to their taking effect.
Mr. Fisher I do not think, to be frank with the hon. Gentleman, that there will be further opportunity to discuss this matter. The object of getting through this Bill, which I hope we shall do with his co-operation today, is to make it possible for Malaysia to federate and come into being as a new nation of the Commonwealth on 31st August. I do not know of any possibility of discussing the Orders in Council before the Recess, and after that it will be too late. I do not think it would be normal to discuss Orders in Council in this category.
Mr. Brockway It is frequently done.
    Question put and agreed to.
    Clause ordered to stand part of the Bill.
    Clauses 5 and 6 ordered to stand part of the Bill.
    Schedules 1 to 3 agreed to.
    Bill reported, without Amendment; read the Third time, and passed.
This work is licensed under the United Kingdom Open Parliament Licence v1.0.
    You are free to:
   * copy, publish, distribute and transmit the information
   * adapt the information
   * exploit the information commercially, for example, by combining it with other information, or by including it in your own product or application
    You must (where you do any of the above):
   * acknowledge the source of the information by including the following attribution statement and, where possible, provide a link to this licence: Contains Parliamentary information licensed under the Open Parliament Licence v1.0.
   * ensure that you do not use the information in a way that suggests any official status or that the Licensor endorses you or your use of the Information
   * ensure that you do not mislead others or misrepresent the information or its source or present the information in a way that discredits the reputation or standing of either House of Parliament or their members or their officials
   * ensure that your use of the information does not breach the Data Protection Act 1998 or the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 or is otherwise unlawful
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hansard of Parliament of the United Kingdom (1963) - Malaysia Bill/STANDING ORDERS (REVISION)

​STANDING ORDERS (REVISION)
HC Deb 19 July 1963 vol 681 c1008
Select Committee appointed to consider and report upon the re-arrangement and re-drafting of the Standing Orders so as to bring them into conformity with existing practice;
Mr. Brian Batsford, Mr. Sydney Irving, Mr. Carol Johnson, Mr. Airey Neave, Sir Hamilton Kerr, Mr. David Renton, Mr. W. R. Williams, and Sir Gerald Wills;
Power to send for persons, papers, and records;
Three to be the Quorum.—[Mr. Hughes-Young.]
This work is licensed under the United Kingdom Open Parliament Licence v1.0.
    You are free to:
   * copy, publish, distribute and transmit the information
   * adapt the information
   * exploit the information commercially, for example, by combining it with other information, or by including it in your own product or application
    You must (where you do any of the above):
   * acknowledge the source of the information by including the following attribution statement and, where possible, provide a link to this licence: Contains Parliamentary information licensed under the Open Parliament Licence v1.0.
   * ensure that you do not use the information in a way that suggests any official status or that the Licensor endorses you or your use of the Information
   * ensure that you do not mislead others or misrepresent the information or its source or present the information in a way that discredits the reputation or standing of either House of Parliament or their members or their officials
   * ensure that your use of the information does not breach the Data Protection Act 1998 or the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 or is otherwise unlawful
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hansberry v. Lee

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Hansberry v. Lee, 311 U.S. 32 (1940), is a famous case now usually known in civil procedure for teaching that res judicata may not bind a subsequent plaintiff who had no opportunity to be represented in the earlier civil action. Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
311 U.S. 32
Hansberry v. Lee
Argued: Oct. 25, 1940. --- Decided: Nov 12, 1940
Messrs. Earl B. Dickerson, Truman K. Gibson, Jr., C. Francis Stradford, Loring B. Moore, and Irvin C. Mollison, all of Chicago, Ill., for petitioners.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 33-34 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. McKenzie Shannon, Angus Roy Shannon, and William C. Graves, all of Chicago, Ill., for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from Pages 35-36 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hansbrough v. Peck

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
72 U.S. 497
Hansbrough v. Peck

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Heartbreak House, Great Catherine, and Playlets of the War/Great Catherine

First performed 1913
GREAT CATHERINE
XXVII
* Apology
* Scene 1
* Scene 2
* Scene 3
* Scene 4
# Heartbreak House, Great Catherine, and Playlets of the War/Annajanska/Preface

​Annajanska is frankly a bravura piece. The modern variety theatre demands for its "turns" little plays called sketches, to last twenty minutes or so, and to enable some favorite performer to make a brief but dazzling appearance on some barely passable dramatic pretext. Miss Lillah McCarthy and I, as author and actress, have helped to make one another famous on many serious occasions, from Man and Superman to Androcles; and Mr Charles Ricketts has not disdained to snatch moments from his painting and sculpture to design some wonderful dresses for us. We three unbent as Mrs Siddons, Sir Joshua Reynolds and Dr Johnson might have unbent, to devise a turn for the Coliseum variety theatre. Not that we would set down the art of the variety theatre as something to be condescended to, or our own art as elephantine. We should rather crave indulgence as three novices fresh from the awful legitimacy of the highbrow theatre.
Well, Miss McCarthy and Mr Ricketts justified themselves easily in the glamor of the footlights, to the strains of Tchaikovsky's 1812. I fear I did not. I have received only one compliment on my share; and that was from a friend who said, "It is the only one of your works that is not too long." So I have made it a page or two longer, according to my own precept: EMBRACE YOUR REPROACHES: THEY ARE OFTEN GLORIES IN DISGUISE. ​
Annajanska was first performed at the Coliseum Theatre in London on the 21st January, 1918, with Lillah McCarthy as the Grand Duchess, Henry Miller as Schneidekind, and Randle Ayrton as General Strammfest.
# Heartbreak House, Great Catherine, and Playlets of the War/Augustus Does His Bit

Written 1916, Performed 1917. "An unofficial Dramatic Tract on War Saving and Cognate Topics by the Author of The Inca of Perusalem"—GBS
AUGUSTUS DOES HIS BIT
XXX
* Preface
* Play
# Heartbreak House, Great Catherine, and Playlets of the War/Annajanska

Written 1917, Produced 1918, Published 1919.
ANNAJANSKA, THE BOLSHEVIK EMPRESS
XXXI
* Preface
* Play
# Heartbreak House, Great Catherine, and Playlets of the War/Augustus Does His Bit/Preface

​I wish to express my gratitude for certain good offices which Augustus secured for me in January,1917. I had been invited to visit the theatre of war in Flanders by the Commander-in-Chief: an invitation which was, under the circumstances, a summons to duty. Thus I had occasion to spend some days in procuring the necessary passport and other official facilities for my journey. It happened just then that the Stage Society gave a performance of this little play. It opened the heart of every official to me. I have always been treated with distinguished consideration in my contracts with bureaucracy during the war; but on this occasion I found myself persona grata in the highest degree. There was only one word when the formalities were disposed of; and that was "We are up against Augustus all day." The showing-up of Augustus scandalized one or two innocent and patriotic critics who regarded the prowess of the British army as inextricably bound up with Highcastle prestige. But our Government departments knew better: their problem was how to win the war with Augustus on their backs, well-meaning, brave, patriotic, but obstructively fussy, self-important, imbecile, and disastrous.
Save for the satisfaction of being able to laugh at Augustus in the theatre, nothing, as far as I know, came of my dramatic reduction of him to absurdity. Generals, admirals, Prime Ministers and Controllers, not to mention Emperors, Kaisers and Tsars, were scrapped remorselessly at home and abroad, for their sins or services, as the case might be. But Augustus stood like the Eddystone in a storm, and stands so to this day. He gave us his word that he was indispensable and we took it. ​
Augustus Does His Bit was performed for the first time at the Court Theatre in London by the Stage Society on the 21st January, 1917, with Lalla Vandervelde as The Lady, F. B.J. Sharp as Lord Augustus Highcastle, and Charles Rock as Horatio Floyd Beamish.
# Haynes v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Haynes v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Haynes v. United States (353 U.S. 81)
* Haynes v. United States (388 U.S. 908)
* Haynes v. United States (390 U.S. 85)
# Haynes v. United States (353 U.S. 81)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
353 U.S. 81
Haynes v. United States
Argued: March 5, 1957. --- Decided: April 1, 1957
Mr.
John H. Hudson, Atlanta, Ga., for the petitioners.
Mr. Hilbert P. Zarky, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Haynes v. United States (388 U.S. 908)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
388 U.S. 908
Haynes v. United States (388 U.S. 908)
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson, for the United States.
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted. Case transferred to the appellate docket and placed on the summary calendar and set for oral argument immediately following No. 181.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Haynes v. Washington

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Clark
United States Supreme Court
373 U.S. 503
Haynes v. Washington
Argued: Feb. 26 and 27, 1963. --- Decided: May 27, 1963
Lawrence Speiser, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
George A. Kain, Spokane, Wash., for respondent.
Mr. Justice GOLDBERG delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Haynes v. United States (390 U.S. 85)/Dissent Warren

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Warren
United States Supreme Court
390 U.S. 85
Haynes v. United States (390 U.S. 85)
Argued: Oct. 11, 1967. --- Decided: Jan 29, 1968
Mr. Chief Justice WARREN, dissenting.
For reasons stated in my dissent in Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39, 88 S.Ct. 697, 19 L.Ed.2d 889, and Grosso v. United States, 390 U.S. 62, p. 77, 88 S.Ct. 709, p. 718, 19 L.Ed.2d 906, I cannot agree with the result reached by the Court in this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Haynes v. United States (388 U.S. 908)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
388 U.S. 908
Haynes v. United States (388 U.S. 908)
Charles Alan Wright, for petitioner.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Grimm's Household Tales, Volume 2/Domestic Servants

Other versions: Domestic Servants
140.—DOMESTIC SERVANTS.
"Whither goest thou?" "To Walpe." "I to Walpe, thou to Walpe, so, so, together we'll go."
"Hast thou a man? What is his name?" "Cham." "My man Cham, thy man Cham; I to Walpe, thou to Walpe; so, so, together we'll go." "Hast thou a child; how is he styled?" "Wild." "My child Wild, thy child Wild; my man Cham, thy man Cham; I to Walpe, thou to Walpe, so, so, together we'll go." "Hast thou a cradle? How callest thou thy cradle? " "Hippodadle." "My cradle Hippodadle, my child Wild, thy child Wild, my man Cham, thy man Cham; I to Walpe, thou to Walpe, so, so, together we'll go."
"Hast thou also a drudge? what name has thy drudge?" ​"From-thy-work-do-not-budge." "My drudge, From-thy-work-do-not-budge, thy drudge. From-thy-work-do-not-budge: my child Wild, thy child Wild; my man Cham, thy man Cham; I to Walpe, thou to Walpe; so, so, together we'll go."
# Grimm's Household Tales, Volume 2/Brides on their Trial

155.—BRIDES ON THEIR TRIAL.
There was once a young shepherd who wished much to marry, and was acquainted with three sisters who were all equally pretty, so that it was difficult to him to make a choice, and he could not decide to give the preference to any one of them. Then he asked his mother for advice, and she said, "Invite all three, and set some cheese before them, and watch how they eat it." The youth did so; the first, however, swallowed the cheese with the rind on; the second hastily cut the rind off the cheese, but she cut it so quickly that she left much good cheese with it, and threw that away also; the third peeled the rind off carefully, and cut neither too much nor too little. The ​shepherd told all this to his mother, who said, "Take the third for thy wife." This he did, and lived contentedly and happily with her.
# Grimm's Household Tales, Volume 2/God's Food

Legend 5. Notes
5.—GOD'S FOOD.
There were once upon a time two sisters, one of whom had no children and was rich, and the other had five and was a widow, and so poor that she no longer had food enough ​to satisfy herself and her children. In her need, therefore, she went to her sister, and said, "My children and I are suffering the greatest hunger; thou art rich, give me a mouthful of bread." The very rich sister was as hard as a stone, and said, "I myself have nothing in the house," and drove away the poor creature with harsh words. After some time the husband of the rich sister came home, and was just going to cut himself a piece of bread, but when he made the first cut into the loaf, out flowed red blood. When the woman saw that she was terrified and told him what had occurred. He hurried away to help the widow and her children, but when he entered her room, he found her praying. She had her two youngest children in her arms, and the three eldest were lying dead. He offered her food, but she answered, "For earthly food have we no longer any desire. God has already satisfied the hunger of three of us, and he will hearken to our supplications likewise." Scarcely had she uttered these words than the two little ones drew their last breath, whereupon her heart broke, and she sank down dead.
# Grimm's Household Tales, Volume 2/Going a Travelling

143.—GOING A TRAVELLING.
There was once a poor woman who had a son, who much wished to travel, but his mother said, "How canst thou travel? We have no money at all for thee to take away with thee." Then said the son, "I will manage very well for myself; I will always say, Not much, not much, not much."
So he walked for a long time and always said, "Not much, not much, not much." Then he passed by a company of fishermen and said, "God speed you! not much, not much, not much." "What sayst thou churl, 'not much?'" And when the net was drawn out they had not caught much fish. So one of them fell on the youth with a stick and said, "Hast thou never seen me threshing?" "What ought I to say, then?" asked the youth. "Thou must say, 'Get it full, get it full.'" After this he again walked a long time, and said, "Get it full, get it full," until he came to the gallows, where they had got a poor sinner whom they were about to hang. Then said he, "Good morning; get it full, get it full." "What sayst thou, knave, get it full? Dost thou want to make out that there are still more wicked people in the world—is not this enough?" And he again got some blows on his back. "What am I to say, then?" said he. "Thou must say, may God have pity on the poor soul."
Again the youth walked on for a long while and said, "May God have pity on the poor soul!" Then he came to a pit by which stood a knacker who was cutting up a horse. The youth said, "Good morning; God have pity on the poor soul!" "What dost thou say, thou ​ill-tempered knave?" and the knacker gave him such a box on the ear, that he could not see out of his eyes. "What am I to say, then?" "Thou must say, 'There lies the carrion in the pit!'"
So he walked on, and always said, "There lies the carrion in the pit, there lies the carrion in the pit." And he came to a cart full of people, so he said, "Good morning, there lies the carrion in the pit!" Then the cart pushed him into a hole, and the driver took his whip and cracked it upon the youth, till he was forced to crawl back to his mother, and as long as he lived he never went out a-travelling again.
# Grimm's Household Tales, Volume 2/Death's Messengers

177.—DEATH'S MESSENGERS.
In ancient times a giant was once travelling on a great highway, when suddenly an unknown man sprang up before him, and said, "Halt, not one step farther!" "What!" cried the giant, "a creature whom I can crush between my fingers, wants to block my way? Who art thou that thou darest to speak so boldly?" "I am Death," answered the other. "No one resists me, and thou also must obey my commands." But the giant refused, and began to struggle with Death. It was a long, violent battle, at last the giant got the upper hand, and struck Death down with his fist, so that he dropped by a stone. The giant went his way, and Death lay there conquered, and so weak that he could not get up again. "What will be done now," said he, "if I stay lying here in a corner? No one will die now in the world, and it will get so full of people that they won't have room to stand beside each other." In the meantime a young man came along the road, who was ​strong and healthy, singing a song, and glancing around on every side. When he saw the half-fainting one, he went compassionately to him, raised him up, poured a strengthening draught out of his flask for him, and waited till he came round. "Dost thou know," said the stranger, whilst he was getting up, "who I am, and who it is whom thou hast helped on his legs again?" "No," answered the youth, "I do not know thee." "I am Death," said he. "I spare no one, and can make no exception with thee,—but that thou mayst see that I am grateful, I promise thee that I will not fall on thee unexpectedly, but will send my messengers to thee before I come and take thee away." "Well," said the youth, "it is something gained that I shall know when thou comest, and at any rate be safe from thee for so long." Then he went on his way, and was light-hearted, and enjoyed himself, and lived without thought. But youth and health did not last long, soon came sicknesses and sorrows, which tormented him by day, and took away his rest by night. "Die, I shall not," said he to himself, "for Death will send his messengers before that, but I do wish these wretched days of sickness were over." As soon as he felt himself well again he began once more to live merrily. Then one day some one tapped him on the shoulder. He looked round, and Death stood behind him, and said, "Follow me, the hour of thy departure from this world has come," "What," replied the man, "wilt thou break thy word? Didst thou not promise me that thou wouldst send thy messengers to me before coming thyself? I have seen none!" "Silence!" answered Death. "Have I not sent one messenger to thee after another? Did not fever come and smite thee, and shake thee, and cast thee down? Has dizziness not bewildered thy head? Has not gout twitched thee in all thy limbs? Did not thine ears sing? Did not tooth-ache bite into thy cheeks? Was it not dark before thine eyes? And besides all that, has not my own brother Sleep reminded thee every night of me? Didst thou not lie by night as if thou wert already dead?" The man could make no answer; he yielded to his fate, and went away with Death.