OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Special 301 Report/2012

Issue 2012 of the Special 301 Report (N. 24).
2012 Special 301 Report
Ambassador Ronald Kirk
Office of the United States Trade Representative
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is responsible for the preparation of this report. U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk gratefully acknowledges in particular the contributions of Deputy U.S. Trade Representatives Demetrios Marantis, Michael Punke, and Miriam Sapiro; USTR General Counsel Timothy Reif; Chief of Staff Lisa Garcia; and Assistant USTR for Public/Media Affairs Carol Guthrie, Assistant USTR for Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Engagement Christine Turner, Assistant USTR for Congressional Affairs Mac Campbell, Executive Secretary William Mack, Senior Policy Advisor Holly Smith, Senior Advisor David Roth, Assistant USTR for Intellectual Property and Innovation Stan McCoy, Director for Intellectual Property and Innovation Paula Karol Pinha, and numerous other staff of the Office of Intellectual Property and Innovation, the Office of General Counsel, and other USTR offices. Thanks are extended to partner agencies, including the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Health and Human Services, Justice, Labor, Transportation, Treasury, and State, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the U.S. Copyright Office.
In preparing the report, substantial information was solicited from U.S. Embassies around the world and from interested stakeholders. The draft of this report was developed through the Special 301 Subcommittee of the interagency Trade Policy Staff Committee.
April 2012
​Table of Contents
# Special 301 Report/2011/Annex 1

​ANNEX 1. STATUTORY BACKGROUND ON SPECIAL 301
Pursuant to Section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended by the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 and the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (enacted in 1994) ("Special 301"), under Special 301 provisions, USTR must identify those countries that deny adequate and effective protection for IPR or deny fair and equitable market access for persons that rely on intellectual property protection. ("Countries" in this context include separate customs territories and the European Union). Countries that have the most onerous or egregious acts, policies, or practices and whose acts, policies, or practices have the greatest adverse impact (actual or potential) on the relevant U.S. products must be designated as "Priority Foreign Countries."
Priority Foreign Countries are potentially subject to an investigation under the Section 301 provisions of the Trade Act of 1974. USTR may not designate a country as a Priority Foreign Country if it is entering into good faith negotiations or making significant progress in bilateral or multilateral negotiations to provide adequate and effective protection of IPR.
USTR must decide whether to identify countries within 30 days after issuance of the annual National Trade Estimate Report. In addition, USTR may identify a trading partner as a Priority Foreign Country or remove such identification whenever warranted.
USTR has created a "Priority Watch List" and "Watch List" under Special 301 provisions. Placement of a trading partner on the Priority Watch List or Watch List indicates that particular problems exist in that country with respect to IPR protection, enforcement, or market access for persons relying on intellectual property. Countries placed on the Priority Watch List are the focus of increased bilateral attention concerning the problem areas.
Additionally, under Section 306, USTR monitors a trading partner's compliance with measures that are the basis for resolving an investigation under Section 301. USTR may apply sanctions if a country fails to satisfactorily implement such measures.
The Trade Policy Staff Committee, in particular the Special 301 Subcommittee, in advising USTR on the implementation of Special 301, obtains information from and holds consultations with the private sector, U.S. embassies, foreign governments, and the U.S. Congress, among other sources.
# Sunset on Calvary

Sunset on Calvary is a Middle English lyric.

## Lyrics

Now gooth sunne under wode: Me reweth, Marye, thy faire rode. Now gooth sunne under tree: Me reweth, Marye, thy sone and thee.

## Glossary

wode: the woods or the wooden cross Me reweth: I pity rode: face
# Sunshine (Lowell)

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
The pool is edged with the blade-like leaves of irises. If I throw a stone into the placid water It suddenly stiffens Into rings and rings Of sharp gold wire.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1925, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 98 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sunshine Book Company v. Summerfield

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
355 U.S. 372
Sunshine Book Company v. Summerfield
Mr. O. John Rogge, for petitioners.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Mr. Samuel D. Slade, for respondent.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sunshine Book Company v. Summerfield/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
355 U.S. 372
Sunshine Book Company v. Summerfield
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is reversed. Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 77 S.Ct. 1304, 1 L.Ed.2d 1498.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sunshine Anthracite Coal Company v. Adkins/Dissent McReynolds

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion McReynolds
Mr. Justice McReynolds is of opinion that the Act under review is beyond any power granted to Congress and that the judgment below should be reversed.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sunshine Protection Act of 2021 (H.R. 69; 117th Congress)

117th congress (2021-2022)
117th CONGRESS 1st Session
H.R. 69
To make daylight savings time permanent, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 4, 2021
Mr. Buchanan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce
A BILL
To make daylight savings time permanent, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

### SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Sunshine Protection Act of 2021”.

### SEC. 2. MAKING DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME PERMANENT.

    (a) Repeal Of Temporary Period For Daylight Savings Time.—Section 3 of the Uniform Time Act of 1966 (15 U.S.C. 260a) is hereby repealed.
    (b) Advancement Of Standard Time.—
       (1) IN GENERAL.—The second sentence of subsection (a) of section 1 of the Act of March 19, 1918 (commonly known as the “Calder Act”) (15 U.S.C. 261), is amended—
          (A) by striking “4 hours” and inserting “3 hours”;
          (B) by striking “5 hours” and inserting “4 hours”;
          (C) by striking “6 hours” and inserting “5 hours”;
          (D) by striking “7 hours” and inserting “6 hours”;
          (E) by striking “8 hours” and inserting “by 7 hours”;
          (F) by striking “9 hours” and inserting “8 hours”;
          (G) by striking “10 hours;” and inserting “9 hours;”;
          (H) by striking “11 hours” and inserting “10 hours”; and
          (I) by striking “10 hours.” and inserting “11 hours.”.
       (2) STATE EXEMPTION.—Such section is further amended by—
          (A) redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
          (B) inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    “(b) Standard Time For Certain States And Areas.—The standard time for a State that has exempted itself from the provisions of section 3(a) of the Uniform Time Act of 1966 (15 U.S.C. 260a(a)), as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of the Sunshine Protection Act of 2021, pursuant to such section, or an area of a State that has exempted such area from such provisions pursuant to such section, shall be, as such State considers appropriate—
       “(1) the standard time for such State or area, as the case may be, pursuant to subsection (a) of this section; or
       “(2) the standard time for such State or area, as the case may be, pursuant to subsection (a) of this section as it was in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of the Sunshine Protection Act of 2021”..”.
       (3) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Such section is further amended, in the second sentence of subsection (a), by striking “Except as provided in section 3(a) of the Uniform Time Act of 1966 (15 U.S.C. 260a),” and inserting “Except as provided in subsection (b),”.
# Tales of Bengal (Sita and Santa Chattopadhyay)

AN EASTERN LIBRARY
No. I
TALES OF BENGAL
TALES OF
BENGAL
By Sita and Santa
Chatterjee. With
an Introduction by
E. J. Thompson.
Humphrey Milford Oxford University Press London Bombay Calcutta & Madras 1922
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tales from the Arabic

* related portals: Arabic literature.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, quotes, travel guide, Wikidata item.
TALES FROM THE ARABIC.
LONDON PRINTED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY 1901
* Volume 1
* Volume 2
* Volume 3
Full Contents (All 3 volumes)
Illustrations
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Tales from the Arabic/Alphabetical Table of the First Lines of the Verse in the “Tales from the Arabic”

ALPHABETICAL TABLE OF THE FIRST LINES OF THE VERSE IN THE “TALES FROM THE ARABIC.”
N.B.—The Roman numerals denote the volume, the Arabic the page.
# Tales from the Arabic/A Merry Jest of a Thief

Second-level story, contained in El Melik ez Zahir Rukneddin Bibers el Bunducdari and the Sixteen Officers of Police
A MERRY JEST OF A THIEF.
A thief of the thieves of the Arabs went [one night] to a certain man’s house, to steal from a heap of wheat there, and the people of the house surprised him. Now on the heap was a great copper measure, and the thief buried himself in the corn and covered his head with the measure, so that the folk found him not and went away; but, as they were going, behold, there came a great crack of wind forth of the corn. So they went up to the measure and [raising it], discovered the thief and laid hands on him. Quoth he, “I have eased you of the trouble of seeking me: for I purposed, [in letting wind], to direct you to my [hiding-]place; wherefore do ye ease me and have compassion on me, so may God have compassion on you!” So they let him go and harmed him not.
Return to El Melik ez Zahir Rukneddin Bibers el Bunducdari and the Sixteen Officers of Police.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Supplement to the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Editions of the Encyclopædia Britannica/Annuities/Tables

TABLE I.
Showing the present Value of One Pound to be received at the End of any Number of Years not exceeding 50.
(See No. 9—12 of the preceding Article.)
TABLE II.
Showing the present Value of an Annuity of One Pound for any Number of Years not exceeding 50.
(No. 9—12.)
TABLE III.
Showing the Sum to which One Pound will increase when improved at Compound Interest during any Number of Years not exceeding 50.
(No. 9—12.)
TABLE IV.
Showing the Amount to which One Pound per Annum will increase at Compound Interest in any Number of Years not exceeding 50.
(No. 9—12.)
TABLE V.
Exhibiting the Law of Mortality at Carlisle. (No. 32.)
TABLE VI.
Showing the Value of an Annuity on a Single Life at every Age, according to the Carlisle Table of Mortality, when the rate of Interest is Five per Cent. (No. 65.)
TABLE VII.
TABLE VIII.
# Supplement to the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Editions of the Encyclopædia Britannica/Anemometer, Anemoscope

​ANEMOMETER, ANEMOSCOPE. See these Articles in the Encyclopædia, and Wind-gage in this Supplement.
# Tales of Secret Egypt/Other Tales

OTHER TALES
* Lord of the Jackals
* Lure of Souls
* The Secret of Ismail
* Harun Pasha
* In the Valley of the Sorceress
* Pomegranate Flower
# Tales of Secret Egypt
## Part I

Tales of Abu Tabah
* The Yashmak of Pearls
* The Death-Ring of Sneferu
* The Lady of the Lattice
* Omar of Ispahan
* Breath of Allah
* The Whispering Mummy

## Part II

Other Tales
* Lord of the Jackals
* Lure of Souls
* The Secret of Ismail
* Harun Pasha
* In the Valley of the Sorceress
* Pomegranate Flower
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1959, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 64 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tales from the Arabic/Story of David and Solomon

Third-level story, contained in Story of the Unjust King and the Tither < King Shah Bekht and His Vizier Er Rehwan
STORY OF DAVID AND SOLOMON.
Certain husbandmen once made complaint to David (on whom be peace!) against certain owners of sheep, whose flocks had fallen upon their crops by night and devoured them, and he bade value the crops [and that the shepherds should make good the amount]. But Solomon (on whom be peace!) rose and said, “Nay, but let the sheep be delivered to the husbandmen, so they may take ​their milk and wool, till they have repaid themselves the value of their crops; then let the sheep return to their owners.” So David withdrew his own ordinance and caused execute that of Solomon; yet was David no oppressor; but Solomon’s judgment was more pertinent and he showed himself therein better versed in jurisprudence.’
Return to Story of the Unjust King and the Tither.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. Dashiell (198 U.S. 521)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
198 U.S. 521
Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. Dashiell
Argued: April 11, 1905. --- Decided: May 29, 1905
Messrs. David D. Duncan, John F. Dillon and Winslow S. Pierce for plaintiff in error. Mr. Ben M. Terrell for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company v. United States (295 U.S. 395)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Wikipedia article
United States Supreme Court
295 U.S. 395
Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company v. United States
Argued: May 13, 1935. ---
This is a suit to restrain the enforcement of two orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission, made July 24, 1933, and December 11, 1933, respectively, relating to rates for the transportation of horses and mules, in carloads, in southwestern territory. Western Horse and Mule Rates, 195 I.C.C. 417. Upon the hearing by the District Court, composed of three judges, the application for an injunction was denied and the amended bill of complaint was dismissed.
This Court, upon an examination of the record, agrees with the conclusion of the District Court that the orders in question were sustained by findings of the Commission acting within its statutory authority and that these findings were adequately supported by evidence. The decree is affirmed.
Affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company v. United States (295 U.S. 395)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
295 U.S. 395
Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company v. United States
Argued: May 13, 1935. ---
Messrs. J. H. Tallichet, of Houston, Tex., and Robert W. Thompson, of Dallas, Tex., for appellants.
The Attorney General, for the United States.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. Railroad Commission of Louisiana (232 U.S. 338)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Wikipedia article
United States Supreme Court
232 U.S. 338
Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. Railroad Commission of Louisiana
Argued: and submitted January 23, 1914. --- Decided: February 24, 1914
Appellant, a corporation organized under the laws of the United States, filed its bill in equity in the circuit court for the eastern district of Louisiana to restrain the enforcement of an order of the Louisiana Railroad Commission fixing rates for the carriage of cottonseed and its products, on the ground that the order exceeded the powers conferred upon the commission by the state law; indeed, was so unreasonably low as to be a violation of the due process clause of the state Constitution. After issue joined the testimony was heard by a special master, who found for complainant. The circuit court, on exceptions filed by respondents to the master's report, after reviewing the facts, gave judgment sustaining the exceptions, setting aside the report, and dismissing the bill on the ground that the evidence did not support the master's report,-in other words, that the complainant had failed to prove its case. On appeal to the circuit court of appeals the evidence was again reviewed, and the judgment affirmed. 112 C. C. A. 538, 192 Fed. 280. This appeal was then taken.
Both the courts below passed on the facts, and agreed in holding that appellant failed to establish by the evidence its right to the relief demanded, and the rule is well settled that findings of fact concurred in by two lower courts will not be disturbed by this court unless shown to be clearly erroneous. Chicago Junction R. Co. v. King, 222 U.S. 222, 56 L. ed. 173, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 79; Dun v. Lumbermen's Credit Asso. 209 U.S. 20, 52 L. ed. 663, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 335, 14 Ann. Cas. 501. As from an examination of the record we find no ground for concluding that there was plain error, the decree must be and is affirmed.
Affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. Railroad Commission of Louisiana (232 U.S. 338)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
232 U.S. 338
Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. Railroad Commission of Louisiana
Argued: and submitted January 23, 1914. --- Decided: February 24, 1914
Mr. Thomas J. Freeman for appellant.
Mr. Wylie M. Barrow and Mr. Ruffin G. Pleasant, Attorney General of Louisiana, for appellees.
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tales of the Long Bow

Title
TALES OF THE LONG BOW
cover
Tales of the Long Bow
By
G. K. CHESTERTON
CASSELL AND COMPANY, LTD
London, New York, Toronto and Melbourne
published
First published 1925
Printed in Great Britain
Table of Contents
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1936, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 87 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tales of the Jazz Age/The Lees of Happiness

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This short story was first published in the "Chicago Tribune," and first published in book form in Tales of the Jazz Age in 1922.
* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# The Biographical Dictionary of America/Abbot, John

​ABBOT, John, educator, was born in Andover, Mass., April 8, 1759; son of Capt. John and Abigail (Abbot) Abbot, and grandson of John and Phebe (Fiske) Abbot, and of Benjamin Abbot. He was graduated at Harvard, A.B., 1784, A.M., 1787; was an instructor at Phillips academy Andover, Mass., 1784-87, and tutor at Harvard college, 1789-92. He prepared for the Congregational ministry, but as his health did not permit him to preach, he became cashier of a bank in Portland, Me., 1792-1801. He was an overseer of Bowdoin college, 1796-1816; professor of Ancient languages there, 1802-16, and treasurer and librarian of the college until 1829. He was also a trustee of Andover theological seminary, 1816-20. He died at Andover, Mass., July 2. 1843.
# The Biographical Dictionary of America/Abbot, Samuel

​ABBOT, Samuel, philanthropist, was born in Andover, Mass., Feb. 25, 1732. He engaged in mercantile business in Boston, by means of which he amassed a large fortune, and among other of his earlier philanthropic acts he gave $20,000 toward the building of the Andover theological seminary. He was a man of scrupulous honesty, and was greatly esteemed by all. At his death, which occurred April 30, 1812, he bequeathed to the Andover theological seminary $100,000.