OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Slavonic Fairy Tales/Why is the Sole of Man's Foot Uneven?

WHY IS THE SOLE OF MAN'S FOOT UNEVEN?
(from the servian.)
When the evil angels rebelled against heaven and escaped to the earth, they took the sun with them. Their prince, the archfiend, stuck it on a lance, and carried it on his shoulder.
When, however, the earth complained to heaven that it would be quite burnt up by the sun, an archangel was sent down to see how he could take the sun away from the archfiend. The archangel descended to the earth, and made friends with the prince of the rebels, who, however, at once divined the object of the visit, and stood, accordingly, on his guard.
One day, as they walked together on the earth, they came to the sea, and agreed to bathe in it. The archfiend stuck the lance, with the sun on the top of it, in the ground. After a little while the archangel said,—
"Let us dive and see who will go down the deepest."
​"Good; do you begin," said the arch fiend.
The archangel dived and brought up some sand between his teeth from the bottom of the sea.
It was now the other's turn to dive; but the archfiend was afraid that, during his absence, the archangel might fly away with the sun. Suddenly a thought struck him. He spat upon the ground, and a magpie arose out of it. This bird was to keep watch over the sun while the archfiend also made his plunge and brought up some sand from the bottom of the sea between his teeth.
As soon as the fiend had dived, the archangel made the sign of the cross with his hand, and the sea was immediately covered with ice nine ells thick. Then he seized the sun and flew away with it to heaven.
The magpie screamed with all her might. The archfiend, hearing her voice, guessed at once what had happened, and hastened back. When he came up, however, he found he could not make his way through, as the sea was frozen over. He therefore dived again to the bottom, brought up a large stone, broke the ice with it, and then rushed after the archangel.
The archangel fled through the air with the utmost speed, followed by the fiend. Just as the angel had one foot in heaven, the fiend overtook him, and with his claws, as he tried to stop him, tore off a large piece of flesh from the sole of the other foot.
​The archangel, severely wounded, appeared with the sun in heaven, and weeping, said, "What shall I do, so mutilated as I am?"
And it was said to him, "Cease from thy tears, and despair not. It shall happen that, henceforth, man also, like you, shall have a hollow in the sole of his foot."
As it was said, so it came to pass. From that day there appeared a small hollow in the sole of man's foot, and thus it has remained unto this day.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sligh v. Kirkwood

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
237 U.S. 52
Sligh v. Kirkwood
Argued: March 9 and 10, 1915. --- Decided: April 5, 1915
Messrs. Charles B. Robinson and E. J. L'Engle for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 53 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Charles B. Parkhill for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 54-56 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Slidell v. Grandjean

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
111 U.S. 412
Slidell v. Grandjean
[Syllabus from pages 412-413 intentionally omitted]
[Statement of Case on pages 413-414 intentionally omitted]
James L. Bradford, Willis Drummond, and R. H. Bradford, for appellees.
Sol. Gen. Phillips, for Grandjean and as amicus curiae.
Mr. William Grant (Mr. J. D. Rouse was with him) for appellee Richardson, and defendant Tschirn.
The case was argued on the 2d January, and a decision announced on the 3d March, 1884. On the 24th March, 1884,
Mr. JUSTICE FIELD announced the following order:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Smoke Bellew

* The Taste of the Meat
* The Meat
* The Stampede to Squaw Creek
* Shorty Dreams
* The Man on the Other Bank
* The Race for Number Three (a.k.a. The Race for Number One)
* The Little Man
* The Hanging of Cultus George
* The Mistake of Creation
* A Flutter in Eggs
* The Town-Site of Tra-Lee
* Wonder of Woman
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sonnet 2 (Barnfield, "Beuty and Maiesty are falne at ods")

Published in Cynthia, with certaine Sonnets and the Legend of Cassandra (1595).
* "Sonnet II" in The Complete Poems of Richard Barnfield (ed.) by Alexander B. Grosart (1876).
* "Sonnet II" in Barnfield's Poems (ed.) by Edward Arber (1878).
# Sonnet 3

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Sonnet 3."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Sonnet 3, by William Shakespeare.
* Sonnet 3, by Barnfield
* A sonnet by Petratch

## See also

* Sonnet III
# Sonnet 30

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Sonnet 30."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Sonnet 30, by Ján Kollár
* Sonnet 30, by William Shakespeare.
* Sonnet 30, by Edmund Spenser, part of Amoretti
# Sonnet 29 (Spenser)

Sonnet XXIX
SEE! how the stubborne damzell doth depraue  my simple meaning with disdaynfull scorne:  and by the bay which I vnto her gaue,  accoumpts my selfe her captiue quite forlorne. The bay (quoth she) is of the victours borne,  yielded them by the vanquisht as theyr meeds,  and they therewith doe poetes heads adorne,  to sing the glory of their famous deedes. But sith she will the conquest challeng needs  let her accept me as her faithfull thrall,  that her great triumph which my skill exceeds,  I may in trump of fame blaze ouer all. Then would I decke her head with glorious bayes,  and fill the world with her victorious prayse.
<Publ. 1595>

## Modern spelling

SEE! how the stubborn damsel doth deprave  my simple meaning with disdainful scorn:  and by the bay which I unto her gave,  accompts my self her captive quite forlorn. The bay (quoth she) is of the victors borne,  yielded them by the vanquished as their meeds,  and they therewith do poets' heads adorn,  to sing the glory of their famous deeds. But sith she will the conquest challenge needs  let her accept me as her faithfull thrall,  that her great triumph which my skill exceeds,  I may in trump of fame blaze over all. Then would I deck her head with glorious bays,  and fill the world with her victorious praise.
# Sonnet 30 (Shakespeare)

One of the 154 sonnets by Shakespeare from the collection Shakespeare's Sonnets (1609).

### In the collected Sonnets

* "Sonnet 30," in Shake-speares Sonnets, Never before Imprinted (1609)
* "Sonnet 30," in Shakespeare's Sonnets, (ed.) by William J. Rolfe (1883)
* "Sonnet 30," in Shakespeare's Sonnets, (ed.) by Edward Bliss Reed, The Yale Shakespeare (1923)

### Other editions

* "Poem XXIX: Remembrance," in the Golden Treasury of English Songs and Lyrics, (ed.) by Francis Turner Palgrave (1861).
* "Sonnets (iii)" in the Oxford Book of English Verse 1250-1900 (ed.) by Arthur Quiller-Couch (1931).
* "Sonnets (iii)" in the Oxford Book of English Verse 1250-1918 (ed.) by Arthur Quiller-Couch (1940).
The Sonnets of William Shakespeare
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sonnet 30 (Spencer)

Sonnet XXX
MY loue is lyke to yse, and I to fyre;  how comes it then that this her cold so great  is not dissolu'd through my so hot desyre,  but harder growes the more I her intreat? Or how comes it that my exceeding heat  is not delayd by her hart frosen cold:  but that I burne much more in boyling sweat,  and feel my flames augmented manifold? What more miraculous thing may be told  that fire which all things melts, should harden yse:  and yse which is congeald with sencelesse cold,  should kindle fyre by wonderfull deuyse. Such is the powre of loue in gentle mind,  that it can alter all the course of kynd.
<Publ. 1595>

## Modern spelling

My love is like to ice, and I to fire:  how comes it then that this her cold so great  is not dissolv'd through my so hot desire,  but harder grows, the more I her entreat? Or how comes it that my exceeding heat  is not delayed by her heart frozen cold,  but that I burn much more in boiling sweat,  and feel my flames augmented manifold? What more miraculous thing may be told  that fire, which all thing melts, should harden ice:  and ice which is congealed with senseless cold,  should kindle fire by wonderful device? Such is the pow'r of love in gentle mind  that it can alter all the course of kind.
# Sonnet 31 (Shakespeare)

One of the 154 sonnets by Shakespeare from the collection Shakespeare's Sonnets (1609).

### In the collected Sonnets

* "Sonnet 31," in Shake-speares Sonnets, Never before Imprinted (1609)
* "Sonnet 31," in Shakespeare's Sonnets, (ed.) by William J. Rolfe (1883)
* "Sonnet 31," in Shakespeare's Sonnets, (ed.) by Edward Bliss Reed, The Yale Shakespeare (1923)

### Other editions

* "Sonnet," in Poems and Extracts, (ed.) by William Wordsworth (1905).
* "Sonnets (iv)" in the Oxford Book of English Verse 1250-1900 (ed.) by Arthur Quiller-Couch (1931).
* "Sonnets (iv)" in the Oxford Book of English Verse 1250-1918 (ed.) by Arthur Quiller-Couch (1940).
The Sonnets of William Shakespeare
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sonnet 2: Against the Dispraysers of Poetrie

Published in Poems in divers humors (1598).
* "Sonnet II" in The Complete Poems of Richard Barnfield (ed.) by Alexander B. Grosart (1876).
* "Sonnet II" in Barnfield's Poems (ed.) by Edward Arber (1878).
# Sonnet 2 (Shakespeare)

One of the 154 sonnets by Shakespeare from the collection Shakespeare's Sonnets (1609).
* "Sonnet 2," in Shake-speares Sonnets, Never before Imprinted (1609)
* "Sonnet 2," in Shakespeare's Sonnets, (ed.) by William J. Rolfe (1883)
* "Sonnet 2," in Shakespeare's Sonnets, (ed.) by Edward Bliss Reed, The Yale Shakespeare (1923)
The Sonnets of William Shakespeare
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sonnet 31

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Sonnet 31."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Sonnet 31, by William Shakespeare.
* Sonnet 31, by Edmund Spenser, part of Amoretti
* A sonnet by Petratch
# Social Aspect of Washington before the Disunion

Serialized article, as published in Once a Week.
* Part 1
* Part 2
# So proud she was to die

So proud she was to die It made us all ashamed That what we cherished, so unknown To her desire seemed — So satisfied to go Where none of us should be Immediately — that Anguish stooped Almost to Jealousy —
# So set its Sun in Thee

So set its Sun in Thee What Day be dark to me — What Distance — far — So I the Ships may see That touch — how seldomly — Thy Shore?
# So you love me

"So you love me, have no care"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1911), "So you love me" in Harper's Bazar (October 1911).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1912), "So you love me" in The Unconquered Air, and Other Poems (1912).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "So you love me" in Poems II.

## Notes

* ↑ View this version at Google books.
# So gay a Flower

So gay a Flower Bereaves the Mind As if it were a Woe — Is Beauty an Affliction — then? Tradition ought to know —
# Social Evolution

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Social Evolution."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Social Evolution, a work by Benjamin Kidd
* "Social Evolution" by John Elliott Cairnes in Popular Science Monthly, 6 (March 1875)
# So from the mould

So from the mould Scarlet and Gold Many a Bulb will rise — Hidden away, cunningly, From sagacious eyes.
So from Cocoon Many a Worm Leap so Highland gay, Peasants like me, Peasants like Thee Gaze perplexedly!
# Siggers v. Tunica County Board of Supervisors

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
502 U.S. 933
Siggers v. Tunica County Board of Supervisors
No. 91-6255
Application for Injunction and Stay.
The application for an injunction and stay pending appeal presented to Justice SCALIA and by him referred to the Court is denied.
Justice BLACKMUN, with whom Justice STEVENS and Justice O'CONNOR join, dissenting.
I would grant the stay. In my judgment, appellants have shown both a reasonable likelihood that four Justices will vote to note probable jurisdiction as well as a "fair prospect" of success on the merits. Lucas v. Townsend, 486 U.S. 1301, 1304, 108 S.Ct. 1763, 1764, 100 L.Ed.2d 589 (1988) (KENNEDY, J., in chambers). In addition, I think the equities favor the appellants. See id., at 1305, 108 S.Ct., at 1765.
On May 14, 1991, the County submitted a reapportionment plan to the Attorney General for preclearance under § 5 of the Voting Rights Act. That section provides that if the Attorney General does not object to a proposed plan within 60 days, the plan is deemed approved. See 42 U.S.C. § 1973c.
On June 24, the Justice Department requested additional information. On July 12, 59 days after the County originally submitted its preclearance request, the Chief of the Justice Department's Voting Rights Section dispatched a letter to appellee announcing that

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sigafus v. Porter

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
179 U.S. 116
Sigafus v. Porter
Argued: April 21, 24, 1899. --- Decided: for reargument May 15, 1899
Messrs. Edmund Wetmore and Henry B. Johnson for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Albert Stickney for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sight Unseen (Everybody's Magazine)

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Commons category, Wikidata item.
“... a psychic mystery story which will keep you guessing up to the last chapter, and thrill you all the way.”
SIGHT UNSEEN
by Mary Roberts Rinehart
Author of “The Secret of the Seven Stars,” “The Case of Jennie Brice,” etc.
MISS JEREMY CAME OUT OF HER TRANCE WEAK AND LOOKING EXTREMELY ILL.
* Part I June 1916
* Part II July 1916
* Part III August 1916
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1958, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 65 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sioux City Bridge Company v. Dakota County Neb

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
260 U.S. 441
Sioux City Bridge Company v. Dakota County Neb
Argued: Nov. 20, 1922. --- Decided: Jan 2, 1923
Messrs. F. W. Sargent, of Chicago, Ill., and Wymer Dressler, of Omaha, Neb., for petitioner.
Mr. R. A. Van Orsdel, of Omaha, Neb., for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sioux City Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
110 U.S. 205
Sioux City Company v. United States
E. S. Bailey, for plaintiff in error.
Sol. Gen. Phillips, for defendant in error.
BRADLEY, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sacred Books of the East/Kullavagga

Cullavagga includes accounts of the First and Second Buddhist Councils and the establishment of the community of Buddhist nuns, as well as rules for addressing offenses within the community. Warning: template has been deprecated.
A part of the 50-volume series of the Sacred Books of the East, were the Vinaya Texts, translated from the Pâli by H. Oldenberg T. W. Rhys-Davids. They came in 3 parts, that as part of the series were volume XIII, XVII, and XX. The Kullavagga spanned from the end of Part II (i.e. Vol. XVII) to the whole of Part III (i.e. Vol. XX). This page is created for readers' convenience, as it gives the full contents of the book that had been divided in paper-based edition.
* First Khandhaka (The Minor Disciplinary Proceedings)
* Second Khandhaka (Probation and Penance)
* Third Khandhaka (Probation and Penance)
* Fourth Khandhaka (The Settlement of Disputes among the Fraternity)
* Fifth Khandhaka (On the Daily Life of the Bhikkhus)
* Sixth Khandhaka (On Dwellings and Furniture)
* Seventh Khandhaka (Dissensions in the Order)
* Eighth Khandhaka (Regulations as to the Duties of the Bhikkhus towards one another)
* Ninth Khandhaka (On Exclusion from the Pâtimokkha Ceremony)
* Tenth Khandhaka (On the Duties of Bhikkhunîs)
* Eleventh Khandhaka (On the Council of Râgagaha)
* Twelfth Khandhaka (On the Council of Vesâli)
# Sacred Books of the East/Transliteration of Oriental Alphabets

Layout 1
Transliteration of Oriental Alphabets adopted for the Translations of the Sacred Books of the East.
# Sacred Books of the East/Volume 10

VOL. X
PART I
Oxford
AT THE CLARENDON PRESS
1881
THE DHAMMAPADA
A COLLECTION OF VERSES
BEING ONE OF THE CANONICAL BOOKS OF THE BUDDHISTS
TRANSLATED FROM PÂLI
BY
F. MAX MÜLLER
Oxford
AT THE CLARENDON PRESS
1881
[All rights reserved]
CONTENTS.
THE
SACRED BOOKS OF THE EAST
TRANSLATED
BY VARIOUS ORIENTAL SCHOLARS
AND EDITED BY
F. MAX MÜLLER
VOLUME X PART II
Oxford AT THE CLARENDON PRESS 1881
[All rights reserved]
​THE SUTTA-NIPATA A COLLECTION OF DISCOURSES BEING ONE OF THE CANONICAL BOOKS OF THE BUDDHISTS TRANSLATED FROM PALI BY V. FAUSBOLL
CONTENTS.
# Sacred Books of the East/Volume 1

VOL. I
Oxford
AT THE CLARENDON PRESS
1879
# St. Louis Hay & Grain Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
191 U.S. 159
St. Louis Hay & Grain Company v. United States
Argued: October 30 and November 2, 1903. --- Decided: November 16, 1903
Messrs. William E. Harvey, George A. King, and William B. King for appellant.
Assistant Attorney General Pradt for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from 160 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# St. Louis Iron Mountain Southern Railway Company v. Wynne

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
224 U.S. 354
St. Louis Iron Mountain Southern Railway Company v. Wynne
Argued: December 14, 1911. --- Decided: April 15, 1912
Messrs. W. E. Hemingway and E. B. Kinsworthy for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 354-356 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Robert E. Wiley and Powell Clayton for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 356-358 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Van Devanter delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# St. Louis Iron Mountain Southern Railway Company v. Edwards

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
227 U.S. 265
St. Louis Iron Mountain Southern Railway Company v. Edwards
Argued: January 20, 1913. --- Decided: February 24, 1913
Messrs. Martin L. Clardy, H. G. Herbel, Lovick P. Miles, and Thomas B. Pryor for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 266 intentionally omitted]
No appearance for defendant in error.
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# St. Louis Iron Mountain Southern Railway Company v. Taylor

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
210 U.S. 281
St. Louis Iron Mountain Southern Railway Company v. Taylor
Argued: and Submitted April 14, 1908. --- Decided: May 18, 1908
Messrs. Rush Taggart, John F. Dillom, Lovick P. Miles, and Oscar L. Miles for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 282 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Sam R. Chew for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 283 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Moody delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# St. Louis Malleable Casting Company v. George C. Prendergast Construction Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
260 U.S. 469
St. Louis Malleable Casting Company v. George C. Prendergast Construction Company
Argued: Dec. 7 and 8, 1922. --- Decided: Jan 2, 1923
Mr. Lambert E. Walter, of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Wm. K. Koerner, of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McKENNA delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse