OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Genealogy

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Genealogy."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Genealogy" by John Amphlett in Popular Science Monthly, 13 (September 1878)
* "Genealogy (in the Bible)," in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
# Gordon Brown: First Speech as Prime Minister

Delivered outside 10 Downing Street on 27 June, 2007
I have just accepted the invitation of Her Majesty The Queen to form a government. This will be a new government with new priorities and I have been priviliged to have been granted the great opportunity to serve my country. And at all times I will be strong in purpose, steadfast in will, resolute in action, in the service of what matters to the British people, meeting the concerns and aspirations of our whole country.
I grew up in the town that I now represent in Parliament. I went to the local school. I wouldn't be standing here without the opportunites that I received there. And I want the best of chances for everyone. That is my mission: That if we can fulfill the potential and realise the talents of all our people, then I am absolutely sure that Britain can be the great global success story of this century.
As I have travelled round the country and as I have listened and I've learnt from the British people and as Prime Minister I will continue to listen and learn from the British people, I have heard the need for change. Change in our NHS, Change in our schools, Change with affordable housing, Change to build trust in Government, Change to protect and extend the British way of life. And this need for change cannot be met by the old politics. So what I will reach out beyond narrow party interest. I will build a Government that uses all the talents. I will invite men and women of goodwill to contribute their energies in a new spirit of public service, to make our nation what it can be. And I am convinced that their is no weakness in Britain today that cannot be overcome by the strengths of the British people.
On this day, I remember words that have stayed with me since my childhood and which matter a great deal to me today. My school motto: "I will try my utmost." This is my promise to all of the people of Britain. And now let the work of change begin.
Thank you.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gordon v. Cheston

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
44 U.S. 133
Gordon v. Cheston

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gordon v. Lance

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
403 U.S. 1
Gordon et al. v. Lance et al.
Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
No. 96 Argued: January 18, 1971 --- Decided: June 7, 1971
West Virginia's constitutional and statutory requirement that political subdivisions may not incur bonded indebtedness or increase tax rates beyond those established by the State Constitution without the approval of 60% of the voters in a referendum election does not discriminate against or authorize discrimination against any identifiable class and does not violate the Equal Protection Clause or any other provision of the United States Constitution. Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368, and Cipriano v. City of Houma, 395 U.S. 701, distinguished. Pp. 4-8.
153 W. Va. 559, 170 S.E. 2d 783, reversed.
BURGER, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BLACK, DOUGLAS, STEWART, WHITE, and BLACKMUN, JJ., joined. HARLAN, J., filed a statement concurring in the result, post, p. 8. BRENNAN and MARSHALL, JJ., filed a dissenting statement, post, p. 8.
George M. Scott argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners.
Charles C. Wise, Jr., argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was J. Henry Francis, Jr.
Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed by Slade Gorton, Attorney General of Washington, and Philip H. Austin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Washington et al.; by Thomas M. O'Connor for the City and County of San Francisco; by Francis R. Kirkham and Francis M. Marshall for the California Taxpayers' Association; and by George E. Svoboda for Hayes Smith.
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by James R. Ellis for Seattle School District No. 1; by Stephen J. Pollak, William H. Dempsey, Jr., Ralph J. Moore, Jr., and Robert H. Chamin for the National Education Association et al.; by August W. Steinhilber and Robert G. Dixon, Jr., for the National School Boards Association; by David R. Hardy and Robert E. Northrup for the Missouri State Teachers Association; by William B. Beebe, Hershel Shanks, and Allan I. Mendelsohn for the American Association of School Administrators et al.; by Melvin L. Wulf for the American Civil Liberties Union et al.; and by Paul W. Preisler for the Committee for the Equal Weighting of Votes.
Briefs of amici curiae were filed by John W. Witt and Joseph Kase, Jr., for the City of San Diego et al., and by Chas. Chaflin Allen, pro se.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gordon v. Gilfoil

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
99 U.S. 168
Gordon v. Gilfoil
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Henry B. Kelly and Mr. Henry L. Lazarus for the appellant.
Mr. Samuel R. Walker for the appellee.
MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gordon v. Butler

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
105 U.S. 553
Gordon v. Butler
Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Leslie W. Russell for the plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Harry Bingham and Mr. A. X. Parker for the defendant in error.
MR. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gordon v. Lance/Concurrence Harlan

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Harlan
United States Supreme Court
403 U.S. 1
Gordon v. Lance
Argued: Jan. 18, 1971. --- Decided: June 7, 1971
Mr. Justice HARLAN concurs in the result for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in Whitcomb v. Chavis, 403 U.S. 124, 165, 91 S.Ct. 1858, 1881, 29 L.Ed.2d 363.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN and Mr. Justice MARSHALL would affirm for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, 153 W.Va. 559, 170 S.E.2d 783 (1969).

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gerling v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
151 U.S. 673
Gerling v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad Company
Danl. B. Lucas, for plaintiff in error.
John K. Cowen, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice GRAY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Germain v. Mason (79 U.S. 259)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
79 U.S. 259
Germain v. Mason
MOTION by Mr. Nathaniel Wilson to dismiss a writ of error to the Supreme Court of Montana Territory; the case as it seemed, from a not very clear record, being thus:
J. Mason and L. B. Duke brought suit in the court below against Jules Germain to recover a balance due for work and materials furnished in building a house, and to enforce a mechanic's lien against the house and the lot on which it was built for the debt. One C. L. Dahler, A. J. Davis, and eighteen other persons, who the petition stated 'had or claimed to have some interest, claim, or lien on the incumbered premises,' were made defendants, but the petition alleged that their interest, claim, or lien, if any, had accrued subsequently to that of the plaintiffs; and it prayed 'for judgment against the said Jules Germain in the sum of $6651,' and that it be adjudged that the defendants, C. L. Dahler, A. J. Davis, and the eighteen others named, and all persons claiming under them subsequently to the commencement of the action, by barred and foreclosed of all right, claim, lien, &c., in, on, or to the incumbered premises, 'and that the premises be decreed to be sold,' &c. The court decided that the lien of the plaintiffs was paramount to that of all other persons, and gave judgment against Germain in personam for the debt, with an order that if it could not otherwise be made out of him, the real estate on which the lien was claimed should be sold, and out of the proceeds of the sale the debt of the plaintiffs should be first paid. To this judgment Germain alone sued out a writ of error. The writ purported to be taken—
'Because in the records and proceedings, as also in the rendition of the judgment of a plea between J. Mason and L. B. Duke, plaintiffs, and Jules Germain et al., defendants, a manifest error hath happened, to the great damage of the said Jules Germain, one of said defendants as aforesaid, as by his complaint appears.'
The bond recited that 'Jules Germain, one of the defendants in the above cause, had prosecuted a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the United States to reverse the judgment,' and the obligors undertook 'on the part of the appellant' that he would pay the costs, &c.
Mr. Wilson, in support of his motion, argued that as the writ of error described the defendant in the original suit as Jules Germain et al., the case fell within the ruling in Deneale v. Stump's Executors, and similar subsequent cases, and that the writ should be dismissed.
Mr. M. Blair, contra: The money judgment is against Germain alone. He singly can appeal.
Mr. Justice MILLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

* ↑ 8 Peters, 526. 6 Wallace, 355. Mastersonv.Herndon, 10 Wallace, 416.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Germain v. Mason (154 U.S. 587)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
154 U.S. 587
Germain v. Mason
A. M. Woodfolk, F. A. Dick, and George G. Wright, for plaintiff in error.
J. Hubley Ashton and Nathaniel Wilson, for defendants in error.
Mr. Chief Justice CHASE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Germain v. Mason (79 U.S. 259)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
79 U.S. 259
Germain v. Mason
The cases relied on for the dismissal of the writ are all reviewed in Mussina v. Cavazos, and it is there said that they rest upon the principle that all the parties to the original judgment must, when it is a joint judgment, be brought before this court, and that this is not done by a writ which does not give their names.
In the case before us the writ is sued out by Germain alone, who is the only party mentioned as damaged by the alleged error of the court, and who alone gives the appeal bond. If, therefore, Germain can bring the writ without joining other parties as plaintiffs in error, the writ is not defective.
We have examined the record-a very confused one-but from it we gather enough to satisfy us that the judgment of which Germain complains is such a separate judgment against him as authorizes him to ask a review of it here without joining his co-defendants in the court below, who have not thought proper to disturb the judgment.
The lien creditors, co-defendants with Germain, have not sought to reverse the judgment; but Germain, who has a separate, distinct, personal judgment against him for money, in which the other defendants have no interest, has a right, we think, to prosecute a writ of error in his own name without joining them.
MOTION OVERRULED.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# German-American Day, 2011

Issued October 6, 2011
Presidential Proclamation -- German-American Day, 2011
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
A PROCLAMATION
    As a Nation of immigrants, America has been shaped and strengthened by the millions who have come to our shores seeking a better future. German men and women were among the first to have made the perilous journey across the Atlantic to seize the promise of the American dream. The same spirit that guided intrepid settlers to help establish Jamestown, Virginia, and found Germantown, Pennsylvania, is reflected in the indelible contributions to our common culture that we celebrate today.
    Today, nearly one quarter of all Americans trace their ancestry to Germany, and many familiar American traditions -- from Christmas trees to kindergarten -- have German origins. German descendants have fundamentally and positively shaped the course of American history. From the wheels of labor and the fields of sport, to the halls of power and throughout our society, generations of German Americans have helped make America what it is today.
    The bonds of friendship and trust between the United States and Germany continue to enrich both our nations. Our partnership is more important than ever, and it remains indispensable to global security and prosperity. As we observe German-American Day, we celebrate how far we have come together and remember the lasting legacy that past pioneers have bestowed onto us.
    NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 6, 2011, as German-American Day. I encourage all Americans to learn more about the history of German Americans and to commemorate the many contributions they have made to our Nation.
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixth day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand eleven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-sixth.
BARACK OBAMA
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Germain v. Mason

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Germain v. Mason."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Germain v. Mason (79 U.S. 259)
* Germain v. Mason (154 U.S. 587)
# Germain v. Mason (154 U.S. 587)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
154 U.S. 587
Germain v. Mason
The writ of error in this case, as in the case of Wells v. McGregor (decided at this term) 13 Wall. 188, bears the test of the clerk of the supreme court of the territory of Montana, and not the test of the chief justice of this court.
It must therefore be dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gibson v. Shufeldt

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
122 U.S. 27
Gibson v. Shufeldt
Wm. A. Maury, W. W. Crump, and John A. Coke, in support of motion.
No brief filed in opposition.
Mr. Justice GRAY, after stating the case as above reported, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gibson v. Lockheed Aircraft Service/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
350 U.S. 356
Gibson v. Lockheed Aircraft Service
Argued: Dec. 5, 6, 1955. --- Decided: Feb 27, 1956
Petitioner Gibson recovered judgment in a personal injuries action against the lockheed Company in a United States District Court. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed and remanded for a new trial on the ground that four instructions requested by Lockheed and refused by the trial court should have been given. 217 F.2d 730. We granted certiorari, 349 U.S. 943, 75 S.Ct. 871, 99 L.Ed. 1270, to consider the following questions:
(1) Whether Lockheed's objection to the trial court's refusal to give its requested instructions complied with Rule 51 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.
(2) Whether the refusal of the trial court to charge as requested by respondent Lockheed was prejudicial error requiring reversal.
A thorough consideration of the record convinces us that the charge as given by the trial court was both complete and correct. Cf. District of Columbia v. Woodbury, 136 U.S. 450, 466, 10 S.Ct. 990, 996, 34 L.Ed. 472. There was no error in refusing the requested instructions. We consider this to be a case where, in the exercise of our supervisory powers over the lower federal courts, the judgment of the Court of Appeals should be reversed in the interests of justice, and that of the District Court reinstated. Accordingly, we find it unnecessary to consider the question presented as to Rule 51.
Reversed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gibson v. Phillips Petroleum Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
352 U.S. 874
Gibson v. Phillips Petroleum Company
See 352 U.S. 937, 77 S.Ct. 220.
Mr. Henry D. Akin, Jr., for petitioner.
Messrs. Rayburn L. Foster, Harry D. Turner and William L. Kerr, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Felicia Hemans in The New Monthly Magazine Volume 11 1824/The Revellers

The New Monthly Magazine, Volume 11, Pages 368-369
THE REVELLERS.
Ring, joyous chords!—yet again, again!
A swifter still, and a wilder strain!
They are here!—the fair face and the careless heart,
And stars shall wane ere the mirthful part.
—But I met a dimly-mournful glance,
In a sudden turn of the flying dance;
I heard the tone of a heavy sigh,
In a pause of the thrilling melody;
And it is not well that Woe should breathe
On the bright spring-flowers of the festal wreath;
—Ye that to Thought or to Grief belong,
 Leave, leave the Hall of Song!
Ring, joyous chords!—but who art Thou
With the shadowy locks o'er thy pale young brow,
And the world of dreaming gloom that lies
In the misty depths of thy soft dark eyes?
—Thou hast loved, fair girl! thou hast loved too well!
Thou art mourning now o'er a broken spell,
Thou hast pour'd thy heart's rich treasures forth,
And art unrepaid for their priceless worth!
—Mourn on! yet come thou not here the while,
It is but a pain to see thee smile! There is not a tone in our songs for thee,
 —Home with thy sorrows flee!
Ring, joyous chords!—yet again, again!
—But what dost thou with the revel's train?
A silvery voice through the soft air floats,
But thou hast no part in the gladdening notes;
There are bright young faces that pass thee by,
But they fix no glance of thy wandering eye!
Away! there's a void in thy yearning breast,
Thou weary man! wilt thou here find rest?
Away! for thy thoughts from the scene have fled,
And the love of thy spirit is with the dead!
Thou art but more lone midst the sounds of mirth:
 —Back to thy silent hearth!
Ring, joyous chords!—yet again, again!
A swifter still, and a wilder strain!
—But thou, though a reckless mien be thine,
And thy cup be crown'd with the foaming wine,
By the fitful bursts of thy laughter loud,
By thine eye's quick flash through its troubled cloud,
I know thee!—it is but the wakeful fear
Of a haunted bosom, that brings thee here!
I know thee!—thou fearest the lonely Night,
With her piercing stars, and her deep wind's might!
There's a tone in her voice which thou fain wouldst shun,
For it asks what the secret soul hath done!
And thou—there's a dark weight on thine—Away!
 —Back to thy home, and pray!
Ring, joyous chords!—yet again, again! A swifter still, and a wilder strain!
And bring new wreaths!—We will banish all
Save the free in heart, from our festive hall.
On through the maze of the fleet dance, on!
—But where are the young and the lovely?—gone!
Where are the brows with the fresh rose crown'd? And the floating forms with the bright zone bound? And the waving locks and the flying feet,
That still should be where the mirthful meet?
—They are gone—they are fled—they are parted all—
 —Alas! the forsaken Hall!F. H.