OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Moyarra: An Australian Legend in Two Cantos

Second edition. According to the Errata, on Page 30, line 14, after "this" insert "ill."
DRAWN FROM LIFE BY SIR THOMAS MITCHELL.
MOYARRA
An Australian Legend
IN TWO CANTOS.
BY
YITTADAIRN,
Homo sum: humani nihil a me alienum puto.
LONDON
E. A. PETHERICK & CO., 33 Paternoster Row AND AT
MELBOURNE AND SYDNEY
1891
Richard Clay and Sons, Limited,
london and bungay.
ERRATA.
Page 30, line 14, after "this" insert "ill."
MOYARRA, by "YITTADAIRN."
Sir Frederick Barlee (who was Colonial Secretary of Western Australia for about twenty years) wrote to the Author of "Moyarra" —5th April, 1873—
"I write one line to thank you for the pleasure you afforded me in the perusal of 'Moyarra.' I really enjoyed it, and read it several times; and to those who know anything of the character of the Australian aboriginal, there is nothing overdrawn or far-fetched.
F. P. Barlee."
MOYARRA
Experimini
In utramque partem ingenium quid possit meum.
Si nunquam avare pretium statui arti meæ Et eum esse quæstum in animum induxi maximum
Quam maxime servire vestris commodis;
Exemplum statuite in me, ut adolescentuli
Vobis placere studeant potius quam sibi.
Written with the foregoing heading, more than half a century ago, and intended for publication in England at that time, the following Legend is now printed in order that the writer may present copies to friends.
Few changes are needed in the prefatory words which were prepared for it in the early half of the nineteenth century. Most of them are as applicable now as they were then; and, written under impressions fresh and youthful, they may still fitly introduce my rhymes.
"No one has, so far as I know, attempted to depict the simple lives of that race which is now ​so fast melting away before the ardour of the white man's progress in the Australian bush:—soon none of the natural heirs of the soil will remain; and, even now, their primitive life is comparatively unknown to the majority of their invaders.
"I would fain do honour to those artless qualities which have often been my sole social amusement when, week after week, I have sojourned in the bush, with no other companion than my faithful Australian, my dog, and my horse; and I bear willing testimony to the fidelity and cheerfulness which have sometimes made me think my sable companion a pattern worthy of imitation by many of his white and contemptuous supplanters.
"Gratitude, therefore, is one motive which induces me to publish; and if I fail to give pleasure to my countrymen they may yet perhaps, for the sake of the motive, excuse the awkwardness of the deed.
"For the truthful air of the poem I ought easily to be able to vouch; it was written (or rather composed and jotted down subsequently at intervals) when I was in daily communication with the unfortunate race of which it treats; and I now present it as originally written rather than interfere with it in a manner which might prejudice its faithfulness as a representation."
* Canto I
** Notes to Canto I
* Canto II
** Notes to Canto II
# Moyer v. Nichols

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
203 U.S. 221
Moyer v. Nichols
Argued: October 10, 11, 1906. --- Decided: December 3, 1906
Messrs.
Edmund F. Richardson, Clarence s. Darrow, and John H. Murphy for appellant.
Messrs. James H. Hawley and W. E. Borah for appellee.
Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Moyer v. Peabody

Moyer v. Peabody, 212 U.S. 78 (1909), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the governor and officers of a state National Guard, acting in good faith and under authority of law, may imprison without probable cause a citizen of the United States in a time of insurrection and deny that citizen the right of habeas corpus. Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
212 U.S. 78
Moyer v. Peabody
Argued: January 5, 6, 1909. --- Decided: January 18, 1909
Messrs. Edmund F. Richardson and Horace N. Hawkins for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 79-80 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Horace Phelps, William H. Dickson, and John M. Waldron for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 80-81 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Nash-Breyer Motor Company v. Burnet

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
283 U.S. 483
Nash-Breyer Motor Company v. Burnet
Argued: April 29, 1931. --- Decided: May 18, 1931
Messrs. Arthur H. Deibert and Theodore B. Benson, both of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
The Attorney General and Mr. Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Nash v. Harshman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
149 U.S. 263
Nash v. Harshman
In Equity. This was originally a civil action, brought, under the Code of Civil Procedure of Ohio, in the court of common pleas of Logan county, by George W. Harshman, asking a personal judgment against John A. Nash on a note of $26,000, and setting up the execution of a mortgage by Nash to secure the same; also, alleging the subsequent conveyance of the mortgaged premises by Nash to Charles A. Dupee, who, with others, was made a defendant. Nash and Dupee filed answers, and, after the case was at issue it was removed to the circuit court for the northern district of Ohio, under the local prejudice act. In that court the action proceeded merely as a suit in equity to foreclose the mortgage, and a decree was rendered for the sale of the lands. From this decree, Nash appeals. The cause is now heard on motion to dismiss the appeal and affirm the judgment. Appeal dismissed.
One of the grounds relied on by the appellees was that the appeal was insufficient because it was taken by Nash, against whom, as the bill was treated in the circuit court, no relief was demanded, and no decree was made, and because Dupee, whose rights alone were affected by it, was not a party to the appeal.
Louis D. Johnson, for the motion.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Nash v. Harshman/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
149 U.S. 263
Nash v. Harshman
The appeal is dismissed. Hohorst v. Packet Co., 148 U.S. 262, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 590.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Nash v. Florida Industrial Commission

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 235
Nash v. Florida Industrial Commission
Argued: Nov. 9, 1967. --- Decided: Dec 5, 1967
Michael H. Gottesman, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Glenn L. Greene, Jr. for respondents.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Nash v. Illinois

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Fortas
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 906
Nash v. Illinois
George L. Saunders, Jr., for petitioner.
William G. Clark, Atty. Gen. of Illinois, and John J. O'Toole and Donald J. Veverka, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Company of Miami/Dissent Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Douglas Minton
United States Supreme Court
344 U.S. 344
National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Company of Miami
Argued: Dec. 19, 1952. --- Decided: Jan 12, 1953
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, dissenting.
I agree that the Board has the power to use the Woolworth formula in computing back pay awards. But I do not think that its application in every case, regardless of the circumstances, is in accord with the policy of the Act. In the usual case computation of back pay awards on a quarterly basis will serve the purpose of making the employee whole; and it may even be necessary to effectuate the remedy of reinstatement. On the other hand the use of the formula may in some cases produce an inequitable result.
Where, as here, an employer's business fluctuates, the employee's income will not be constant. He will earn more in one month than the next, more in one quarter than the next. Seasonal variations in the business may result in a high total income for one quarter and a low total for the next. A discharged employee, who secures other employment at a normal and constant rate of income, may achieve a yearly rate of pay substantially equal to that of his regular job. That apparently is this case. If, therefore, back pay is computed in this case on a quarterly basis, the employee will probably receive an award in excess of the amount of income he would have earned had he not been discharged. For the quarter during which he would have earned a large amount, he would be awarded the difference between that amount and the lower amount he earned at the outside employment. For a quarter during which his income would have been low he would receive no back pay, provided his outside employment yielded him more than his old job. The net result will probably be that this employee will receive a total amount of earned income, plus back pay, which exceeds what he would have earned at his regular job. Such a result is both inequitable and unwarranted. The Board should not be allowed to use this formula for back pay when in a given case it glaringly works an injustice. There are exceptions to most general rules; and the Board should be the guardian of the exceptions, as well as the formula itself.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Labor Relations Board v. Stowe Spinning Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinions

    Jackson
    Reed
United States Supreme Court
336 U.S. 226
National Labor Relations Board v. Stowe Spinning Company
Argued: Dec. 9 and 10, 1948. --- Decided: Feb 28, 1949
Mr. Mozart G. Ratner, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Paul C. Whitlock, of Charlotte, N.C., for respondents.
Mr. Justice MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Labor Relations Board v. Servette, Inc.

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
377 U.S. 46
National Labor Relations Board v. Servette, Inc.
Argued: Feb. 19, 1964. --- Decided: April 20, 1964
Archibald Cox, Sol. Gen., for petitioner.
Stanley E. Tobin, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Company of Miami

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinions

    Douglas
    Minton
United States Supreme Court
344 U.S. 344
National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Company of Miami
Argued: Dec. 19, 1952. --- Decided: Jan 12, 1953
Mr. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C., for petitioners.
Mr. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Labor Relations Board v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
319 U.S. 50
National Labor Relations Board v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company
Argued: March 5-8, 1943. --- Decided: May 3, 1943
Mr. Robert B. Watts, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Marion Smith, of Atlanta, Ga., for respondent Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co.
Mr. James A. Branch, of Atlanta, Ga., for respondent Southern Ass'n of Bell Telephone Employees.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# New poems and variant readings/Since years ago for evermore

SINCE YEARS AGO FOR EVERMORE
Since years ago for evermore My cedar ship I drew to shore; And to the road and riverbed And the green, nodding reeds, I said Mine ignorant and last farewell: Now with content at home I dwell, And now divide my sluggish life Betwixt my verses and my wife: ​In vain; for when the lamp is lit And by the laughing fire I sit, Still with the tattered atlas spread Interminable roads I tread.
# New poems and variant readings/Small is the trust when love is green

SMALL IS THE TRUST WHEN LOVE IS GREEN
Small is the trust when love is green In sap of early years; A little thing steps in between And kisses turn to tears.
Awhile—and see how love be grown In loveliness and power! Awhile, it loves the sweets alone, But next it loves the sour.
A little love is none at all That wanders or that fears; A hearty love dwells still at call To kisses or to tears.
​Such then be mine, my love to give, And such be yours to take:— A faith to hold, a life to live, For lovingkindness' sake:
Should you be sad, should you be gay, Or should you prove unkind, A love to hold the growing way And keep the helping mind:—
A love to turn the laugh on care When wrinkled care appears, And, with an equal will, to share Your kisses and your tears.
# New poems and variant readings/Prelude

PRELUDE
By sunny market-place and street Wherever I go my drum I beat, And wherever I go in my coat of red The ribbons flutter about my head.
I seek recruits for wars to come— For slaughterless wars I beat the drum, And the shilling I give to each new ally Is hope to live and courage to die.
I know that new recruits shall come Wherever I beat the sounding drum, Till the roar of the march by country and town Shall shake the tottering Dagons down.
For I was objectless as they And loitering idly day by day; But whenever I heard the recruiters come, I left my all to follow the drum.
# New poems and variant readings/Over the land is April

OVER THE LAND IS APRIL
Over the land is April, Over my heart a rose; Over the high, brown mountain The sound of singing goes. Say, love, do you hear me, Hear my sonnets ring? Over the high, brown mountain, Love, do you hear me sing?
By highway, love, and byway The snows succeed the rose. Over the high, brown mountain The wind of winter blows. Say, love, do you hear me, Hear my sonnets ring? Over the high, brown mountain I sound the song of spring, I throw the flowers of spring. Do you hear the song of spring? Hear you the songs of spring?
# New poems and variant readings/Prayer

NEW POEMS AND VARIANT READINGS
PRAYER
I ask good things that I detest, With speeches fair; Heed not, I pray Thee, Lord, my breast, But hear my prayer.
I say ill things I would not say— Things unaware: Regard my breast, Lord, in Thy day, And not my prayer.
My heart is evil in Thy sight: My good thoughts flee: O Lord, I cannot wish aright— Wish Thou for me.
O bend my words and acts to Thee, However ill, That I, whate'er I say or be, May serve Thee still.
​O let my thoughts abide in Thee Lest I should fall: Show me Thyself in all I see, Thou Lord of all.
# New poems and variant readings/So live, so love, so use that fragile hour

SO LIVE, SO LOVE, SO USE THAT FRAGILE HOUR
So live, so love, so use that fragile hour, That when the dark hand of the shining power Shall one from other, wife or husband, take, The poor survivor may not weep and wake.
# New poems and variant readings/O dull cold northern sky

O DULL COLD NORTHERN SKY
O dull cold northern sky, O brawling sabbath bells, O feebly twittering Autumn bird that tells The year is like to die!
O still, spoiled trees, O city ways, O sun desired in vain, O dread presentiment of coming rain That cloys the sullen days!
Thee, heart of mine, I greet. In what hard mountain pass Striv'st thou? In what importunate morass Sink now thy weary feet?
Thou run'st a hopeless race To win despair. No crown Awaits success, but leaden gods look down On thee, with evil face.
And those that would befriend And cherish thy defeat, With angry welcome shall turn sour the sweet Home-coming of the end.
Yea, those that offer praise To idleness, shall yet Insult thee, coming glorious in the sweat Of honourable ways.
# New poems and variant readings/O now, although the year be done

ON NOW, ALTHOUGH THE YEAR BE DONE
On now, although the year be done, Now, although the love be dead, Dead and gone; Hear me, O loved and cherished one, Give me still the hand that led, Led me on.
# New poems and variant readings/Since thou hast given me this good hope, O God

SINCE THOU HAST GIVEN ME THIS GOOD HOPE, O GOD
Since thou hast given me this good hope, O God, That while my footsteps tread the flowery sod And the great woods embower me, and white dawn And purple even sweetly lead me on From day to day, and night to night, O God, My life shall no wise miss the light of love; But ever climbing, climb above Man's one poor star, man's supine lands, Into the azure steadfastness of death, My life shall no wise lack the light of love, My hands not lack the loving touch of hands; But day by day, while yet I draw my breath, And day by day, unto my last of years, I shall be one that has a perfect friend. Her heart shall taste my laughter and my tears, And her kind eyes shall lead me to the end.
# Mrs. Spring Fragrance (1912)

Fragrance
BY SUI SIN FAR [Edith Eaton]
CHICAGO A. C. McCLURG & CO. 1912
COPYRIGHT, 1912 A. C. MCCLURG & CO.
PUBLISHED, MAY, 1912 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
THE•PLIMPTON•PRESS [W • D • O] NORWOOD•MASS•U·S·A
CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I have to thank the Editors of The Independent, Out West, Hampton's, The Century, Delineator, Ladies' Home Journal, Designer, New Idea, Short Stories, Traveler, Good Housekeeping, Housekeeper, Gentlewoman, New York Evening Post, Holland's, Little Folks, American Motherhood, New England, Youth's Companion, Montreal Witness, Children's, Overland, Sunset, and Westerner magazines, who were kind enough to care for my children when I sent them out into the world, for permitting the dear ones to return to me to be grouped together within this volume.
SUI SIN FAR
# New song, called Auld Scotia free/Auld Scotia Free

Auld Scotia Free.
Tune.—The lassie of the glen
Auld Scotia thou’rt my native land, Thy snaw clad hills are dear to me, Thy rocky glens me better please, Then distant lands across the sea.
Nae foreign land tho’ e’er so fine, shall ever gain my heart fræ thee I’ll rather roam thro’ scotia’s shores, For scotia thou’rt for ever free.
Thy peaceful shepherds tend their flocks, Contented they seek not command. The husbandman his labour sees, All thriving well beneath is hand.
Some foreign Empires boast of wealth, Of greater pomp and luxury; Here health and strenth and beauty meet, And scotia thou’rt for ever free.
Thy healthfu’ breeze is pure and clear, Thy sons are straping stout and braw, Can face the foe and boldly fight, And firmly stand nor flinch a flaw.
Nae slave shall tread thy highland hills, Fræ galling bondage thou art free; Nae tyrant e’er shall rule thy shores But scotia thou’lt be ever free.
Tho’ foreign monarchs rage and try To conquer and defeat thy fame, Thy sons can boldly rise and will Their laws and libertys maintain.
O let me never share the fate Of exiles banished o’er thy sea, Here let me live and die in peace, Since scotia thou’rt for ever free.
# New song, called Auld Scotia free/Lamentation for the death of Mc Kay

Lamentation for the death of Mc Kay,
In Glasgow town, of high renown, This hero once did dwell; M‘ Kay by name, of birth and fame, The Scotchmen loved him well.
Like his ancestors true with bonnet blue, The ring he entered in. Resolved by power and strenth of hand His rights for to maintain.
On the second June, the afternoon, The heroes met that day, Resolved by power and body strength, Their science to display:
In the first round Byrue was knocked down Which made them for to cry, The surrouding crowd huzza’d aloud, “Success to bold M‘Kay.”
They met again, the feight went on. Most pleasing for to see; Byrne said unto M‘Kay, “I fear you’ve gone astray.”
But M‘ Kay he said unto his man, “Be not afraid of me; For I’m resolved on this plain’ For death or victory.”
Our manly chief, like a hero bold, His man he did knock down, And the skies did echo with the cheers, Were given from the ring.
At the seventh round the Captain cried, “The game is all our own.” M‘Kay cried out, “although ’tis foul, I’ll have it with renown.
Now to conclude, and make an end Of the fate of brave M‘Kay, Who, like a hero boldly fought; For his country he did die.
Now brave M‘Kay is dead and gone, Far from his native shore. Ye Caledonians now lament, M‘Kay’s sad fate deplore.
# New poems and variant readings/When the sun comes after rain

WHEN THE SUN COMES AFTER RAIN
When the sun comes after rain And the bird is in the blue, The girls go down the lane Two by two.
When the sun comes after shadow And the singing of the showers, The girls go up the meadow, Fair as flowers.
When the eve comes dusky red And the moon succeeds the sun, The girls go home to bed One by one.
And when life draws to its even And the day of man is past, They shall all go home to heaven, Home at last.
# New song, called Auld Scotia free

A NEW SONG. CALLED AULD SCOTIA FREE to which are added O Helen thou art darling The lovely lass of Allan-down Will ye go to the ewe bughts and a Lam- entation for the deatd of the Brave Mc Kay-
AIRDRIE.
Printed by J&J. Neil. Printers and Bookbind- ers, No 21 High Street. where may be had a variety of Songs Histories &e. School Books &c.
* Auld Scotia Free
* Lamentation for the death of Mc Kay
* The lovely lass of Allan-Down
* The true lovers Farewell
* Will ye go to the ewe bughts
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse