OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# State Documents on Federal Relations/7n2

Replies of the States.
Copies of the Virginia and Kentucky resolutions were sent to the "Co-States." Replies were made to Virginia by the legislatures of New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York (different replies from the Senate and the House), Delaware, Pennsylvania (the House) and Maryland. Replies to Kentucky were adopted by the following: New Hampshire (same as to Virginia), Vermont, Rhode Island (similar as to Virginia), Connecticut, New York (the House, same as to Virginia), Pennsylvania, Delaware (similar as to Virginia), Maryland (the House). No State seems to have adopted resolutions at this time approving of the Kentucky and Virginia resolutions. It was in answer to these replies that the second set of Kentucky resolutions (Nov. 22, 1799) and Madison's Report for the Virginia Legislature (1800) were adopted.
The minority in the Virginia Legislature issued an "Address containing a Vindication of the Constitutionality of the Alien and Sedition Laws."
References: The replies to Virginia from the New England States, the Senate of New York, and from Delaware are in Elliot's Debates (ed. 1861), IV, 532–539; also in a pamphlet entitled The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions, etc., published by Jonathan Elliot (Washington, May, MDCCCXXXII), 9–15; additional replies are in The American Historical Review, V, 244–252, supplementing an important article by F. M. Anderson, on Contemporary Opinion of the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions, ibid., 45–63, 225–244. The most important of the replies from eight of the States, either because of the previous or subsequent attitude of these States toward the Federal Government, or because of the declaration in regard to the function of the Federal Judiciary, are here re-printed.
In the House of Representatives, February 1, 1799.
Resolved, By the Senate and House of Representatives of the state of Delaware, in General Assembly met, that they consider the resolutions from the state of Virginia, as a very unjustifiable interference with the General Government and constituted authorities of the United States, and of dangerous tendency, and therefore not fit subject for further consideration of the General Assembly.
Test, John Fisher, C. S. John Caldwell, C. H. R.
[Elliot's Va. and Ky. Res., etc., 9].
* ↑ Similar reply sent to Kentucky.
* ↑ The formal indorsements are omitted in the other cases.
# State Documents on Federal Relations/40

40. Reply of the Legislature of New Jersey.
February 17, 1815.
House of Assembly, February 10.
The committee to whom was referred the several propositions for the amendment of the Constitution of the United States, adopted by the general assembly of Connecticut, and at their request communicated to his excellency the governor, to be laid before the legislature of this state for their approbation and adoption, beg leave to report, that they have been induced by the untoward circumstances of the times, and the general aspect of our political affairs to consider the same, with a view rather to their general bearing, character and tendency, than to their several intrinsic merits. Under these impressions they are constrained to remark, that the leading purpose, the favorite master principle pervading all the propositions in question, is to reduce ​within a narrower sphere the power and influence of the general government, and thereby to weaken its arm, at a time when, above all others, it requires to be strengthened. Their obvious tendency also is, to throw amongst the states of the union the apple of discord—to increase those jealousies and suspicions, which have been already too far excited, and to give new life, activity and nurture to those seeds of dissention and disunion which have been recently sown with an unsparing hand by insidious combinations and associations, all of them professing to promote the general good, but acting in direct opposition to their professions. The committee feel themselves impelled, therefore, by the strongest obligations of patriotism and duty, to recommend to the house, that each and all of the before mentioned seven propositions of amendment be most promptly and unqualifiedly rejected.
To which report the house of assembly agreed and thereupon,
Resolved, by the house of assembly of New Jersey, That the before mentioned seven propositions of amendment of the constitution of the United States be and the same are hereby rejected. [Agreed to by the Senate, February 17.]
[Niles' Register, VIII, 16.]
# State Documents on Federal Relations/5n

New Hampshire and the Federal Judiciary.
1794, 1795.
The first the following remonstrances was due to a decision rendered by the United States Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire, October 24, 1793, enforcing the decree of the Court of Appeals in Cases of Capture, in a case growing out of the capture of the brigantine "Susannah" by the privateer the "McClary" in October, 1777. The latter vessel was owned and manned by citizens of New Hampshire, but was acting under the commission and authority of Congress. The Courts of New Hampshire condemned the "Susannah" and her cargo as lawful prize, and refused to grant an appeal to Congress as contrary to the law of the State. A petition for an appeal in this case (Treadwell and Penhallow v. brig Susannah) was, however, sent to Congress, and its prayer granted by the Court of Commissioners, June 26, 1779, by virtue of the Resolves of Congress of November 25, 1775 (Journal of Congress [ed. 1800], I, 241, 242.) The case came up for trial before the legal successors of this body, the newly erected Court of Appeals in Cases of Capture (Resolves of January 15, 1780, Jour. of Cong., VI, 10) in September, 1783. This Court reversed the decision of the New Hampshire Courts. Here the case rested until Elisha Doane, one of the appellants, finally brought proceedings in the Federal Circuit Court of New Hampshire in 1793, with the result as indicated above. On a writ of error the case was brought before the Supreme Court of the United States, and judgment was given, February 24, 1795, in the case of Penhallow et al., v. Doane's Administrators, maintaining the jurisdiction of the United States Courts, and confirming the decision of the inferior courts. The second of these remonstrances was presented to Congress three days later.
References: Texts: Amer. State Papers, Misc., I, 79, 123, 124. See the case of Penhallow v. Doane, 3 Dallas, 54, for full facts in the case. For history of the United States Courts prior to the adoption of the Constitution, and incidentally of this case, see J. F. Jameson, The Predecessor of the Supreme Court, in Essays in Const. History, ch. 1; J. C. Bancroft Davis, Courts of Appeal in Prize Cases, 131 United States Reports, Appx. xxix–xxxiv.
# State Documents on Federal Relations/7n1

For context, see Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions; for the actual documents see the Virginia Resolutions of 1798, Kentucky Resolution of 1798, and Kentucky Resolution of 1799.
Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions.
1798, 1799.
It has been deemed unnecessary to reprint these resolutions in this series, as this has already been done in various publications. Among the most accessible and convenient of such reprints may be mentioned the following:
American History Leaflets, No. 15. (10c. A. Lowell & Co., New York, 1894). William MacDonald, Editor. Select Documents, illustrative of the History of the United States, 148–160. (The Macmillan Co., New York, 1898.) Howard W. Preston, Documents, illustrative of American History, 283–295. (Putnam's, New York, 1886.) The Federalist (Ford's ed., New York, 1898), Appx. 679–686. Elliot's Debates, 528–532, 540–545 (ed. 1861). For a facsimile of a copy of the Kentucky resolutions of 1798, as sent to the other States, cf. Writings of Jefferson (Ford's ed., New York, 1896), VII, inserted between pages 288 and 289. Jefferson's draft is to be found in his Writings (Ford's ed.), VII, 289–309; Works (ed. 1856), IX, 464–471. Also important portions in Am. History Leaflets, No. 15, 17–21. For history of the same, cf. E. D. Warfield, Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 (New York, 1887). For additional bibliography, cf. Channing and Hart, Guide to American History, § 165.
# State Documents on Federal Relations/40n

Replies of the States to the Hartford Convention Amendments.
These amendments as indorsed by the legislatures of Massachusetts and Connecticut did not even receive the approval of any of the other New England States, and the legislatures of the following nine States passed resolutions of disapproval: Vermont, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virginia, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee and Louisiana. (For references, see Ames, Proposed Amendments, 46, note, 265, note, 332.) Most of the legislatures simply passed resolutions of non concurrence, but the legislatures of New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, accompanied their resolutions with interesting reports of disapproval. Extracts from the reports of New Jersey and New York follow. The very elaborate report of the Senate of Pennsylvania, written by a Federalist, is too long to be reprinted here, but is in Senate Journal of Penna., 1814–15, 381–397; a digest of the report is given in The Historical Register, 1814, 131–136. A printed attested copy of this report was communicated to Massachusetts, and is in the Mass. Archives.
# Singleton v. Cheek

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
284 U.S. 493
Singleton v. Cheek
Argued: Jan. 22, 1932. --- Decided: Feb 15, 1932
Mr. A. G. C. Bierer, Jr., of Guthrie, Okl., for petitioners.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Singleton v. Touchard/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
66 U.S. 342
Singleton v. Touchard
There were two several instructions given by the court below to the jury. If either of them be correct, the verdict rendered for the plaintiff below was correct, and the judgment of the court thereon must be affirmed.
The plaintiff in ejectment claimed under a patent from the United States; the defendants under a claim confirmed by the District Court, on which an appeal had been entered by the Attorney General. This claim had not been surveyed; its boundaries were not officially ascertained, nor had any patent been issued for it.
The court instructed the jury, 'that in the action of ejectment the legal title must prevail; that the plaintiff had a legal title by his patent, and the defendant's, if any, was but an inchoate and equitable title, which might avail in a court of chancery, but it could not avail the defendant in action of ejectment.'
This instruction was in exact accordance with numerous decisions of this court, (see Mezes vs. Greer, 24 How., 268,) and justified the verdict, even if there had been error in the other instructions given.
There is another and important question in the case. It relates to the nature of the title of a pueblo to its common or pasture lands, and whether, under the laws and customs of Spain and Mexico, the government of the colony could make valid sales within the boundaries of the common so claimed?
This question is now for the first time presented to this court. The defendants in error have filed their brief, containing an elaborate argument; but the plaintiffs in error have not furnished us any. As it is not necessary, to our judgment of affirmance of this case, to give any opinion on this point, we decline any examination of the question on an ex parte argument.
We may give, as an additional reason for this course, that the question depends on the local law, and on the history and custom of the Mexican government and the Governors of California. And since the appeal in this case, it seems to have been adjudged by the local tribunals. (See Hart vs. Burnett, 15 Cal. Rep., 544; and Brown vs. San Francisco, 16 Cal. Rep., 452.)
This decision of a question of local law by these domestic tribunals may well have been considered by the plaintiffs in error as a sufficient reason for abandoning his case without argument here.
Judgment of the District Court affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Southern Historical Society Papers/Volume 28

SOUTHERN
Historical Society Papers.
____________________
VOLUME XXVIII.
edited by
R. A. BROCK,
____________________
RICHMOND, VA. Published by the Society.
page
WM, ELLIS JONES,
PRINTER,
RICHMOND, VA.
page
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
PAGE
page
ERRATA.
| Page 77. | For country read county. |
| " | For 1863 read 1864. |
| Page 80. | For Welton read Melton. |
| Page 106. | For 1899 read 1900. |
| Page 114. | For "now Grand Commander," &c., read "now commanding the Virginia Division of the United Confederate Veterans, with the rank of Major-General." |
| Page 384. | For Mrs. Joseph D. Davis read Mrs. Joseph R. |
| Page 383. | For Mrs. W. G. Behan-read Mrs. W. J. |
# Southern Historical Society Papers/Volume 29

SOUTHERN
Historical Society Papers.
____________________
VOLUME XXIX.
edited by
R. A. BROCK,
____________________
RICHMOND, VA. Published by the Society.
page
WM. ELLIS JONES, PRINTER, RICHMOND, VA.
page
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
PAGE
# Southern Historical Society Papers/Volume 27

SOUTHERN
Historical Society Papers.
____________________
VOLUME XXVII.
edited by
R. A. BROCK,
____________________
RICHMOND, VA. Published by the Society.
page
WM. ELLIS JONES,
PRINTER,
RICHMOND, VA.
page
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
PAGE
# St. Nicholas/Volume 32/Number 3/Thrilling Fact

* related authors: Georg Stoopendaal.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, quotes, Wikidata item.
A Thrilling Fact
By Jane Ellis Joy.
# St. Nicholas/Volume 32/Number 4/Advertisements/Back

    Peter’s Chocolate 5
    St. Nicholas Stamp Page 6
    Stamps, etc. 7
    Grape-Nuts 8
    Rubifoam 9
    Century Books 10
    Miscellaneous 11
    St. Nicholas Advertising Competition 12
    A. E. Little & Co. 13
    Railroads 14
    Mellin’s Food 15
    Ivory Soap 16
    Libby’s 17
    Back Cover Bcv
# St. Nicholas/Volume 32/Number 3/Seeing Fairyland

* related authors: Albertine Randall Wheelan.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Seeing Fairyland
The Guide: “Turning now from the Palace of the Fairy Queen on the right, we see, on the left, the Warerooms of Santa Claus—absolutely the largest and busiest place in Fairyland. Go on, Mr. Motorman. our next stop will be Aladdin‘s Cave.”
# St. Nicholas/Volume 32/Number 3/Rhyme-and-Picture/The Road

Illustrated by the author
Three Rhyme-and-Picture Pages
By Lucy Fitch Perkins.
I. The Road.
| Somewhere there’s a long white road  That ends nowhere at all. It leads from winter into spring,  From summer through the fall. | Somewhere the grass is fresh and green,  And gentle breezes blow. Somewhere the wind is sharp and keen,  And the fields are white with snow. |
# St. Nicholas/Volume 32/Number 3/Rhyme-and-Picture

Illustrated by the author.
    II‍I. The Road 235
    I‍II. The Critic 236
    III. Borrowed Trouble 237
# St. Nicholas/Volume 32/Number 3/Rhyme-and-Picture/The Critic

Illustrated by the author
II. The Critic.
* If only more people would write fewer books  How well pleased I would be! If all of the authors would change into cooks  ’T would suit me perfectly.
# St. Nicholas/Volume 32/Number 4

New Serial: “Pinkey Perkins—Just a Boy.” Begins in this Number
FOR - YOUNG - FOLKS
CONDUCTED BY
MARY - MAPES - DODGE
MACMILLAN AND Co - L’T’D, ST. MARTIN’S ST - LONDON
THE - CENTURY - CO - UNION - SQUARE - NEW - YORK
COPYRIGHT, 1904, BY THE CENTURY CO. ENTERED AT THE POST-OFFICE AT NEW YORK AS SECOND-CLASS MAIL MATTER.
“Skating with teacher.”
ST. NICHOLAS
(The entire contents of this Magazine are covered by the general copyright, and articles must not be reprinted without special permission.)
CONTENTS OF ST. NICHOLAS FOR FEBRUARY, 1905.
Subscription price, $3.00 a year; single number, 25 cents. The half-yearly parts of ST. NICHOLAS end with the October and April numbers respectively, and the red cloth covers are ready with the issue of these numbers; price 50 cents, by mail, post-paid; the two covers for the complete volume. $1.00. We bind and furnish covers for 75 cents per part, or $1.50 for the complete volume. In sending the numbers to us, they should be distinctly marked with owner’s name, and 54 cents (27 cents per part) should be included in remittance, to cover postage on the volume if it is to be returned by mail. Bound volumes are not exchanged for numbers.
| FRANK H. SCOTT, Presi. CHAS F. CHICHESTER, Treas. WILLIAM W. ELLSWORTH, Secy. | THE CENTURY CO. Union Square, New York, N. Y. |
    Front 2-4
    Back 5-18
# St. Nicholas/Volume 32/Number 3/Rhyme-and-Picture/Borrowed Trouble

Illustrated by the author
III. Borrowed Trouble.
| | ‍ |
| In the great State of Rhode Island, on the  way to Providence, I came upon a weeping man a-sitting on a  fence. “Pray tell me, sir,” says I to him, “what  causes you such sorrow.” Says he to me, “The troubles that I fear  will come to-morrow.” Says I to him, “Land sakes alive! The  trouble ’s with your liver!” Says he to me, “I ’m thinking, ma’am, of  jumping in the river.” Says I to him, “Come home with me and  drink some boneset tea.” Says he to me, “No, thank you, ma’am  I ’d rather stay ’s I be." |||
# St. Nicholas/Volume 32/Number 4/Advertisements

    Swifts cover
    Century Books 2
    Schools 3
    Prudential 4
    Peter’s Chocolate 5
    St. Nicholas Stamp Page 6
    Stamps, etc. 7
    Grape-Nuts 8
    Rubifoam 9
    Century Books 10
    Miscellaneous 11
    St. Nicholas Advertising Competition 12
    A. E. Little & Co. 13
    Railroads 14
    Mellin’s Food 15
    Ivory Soap 16
    Libby’s 17
    Back Cover Bcv
# So Let It Be

First published in the Broadway Journal on April 5, 1845 under the pseudonym "Violet Vane". It was addressed to Edgar Allan Poe.
Perhaps you think it right and just,  Since you are bound by nearer ties, To greet me with that careless tone,  With those serene and silent eyes.
So let it be! I only know,  If I were in your place to-night, I would not grieve your spirit so,  For all God's worlds of life and light!
I could not turn, as you have done,  From every memory of the past; I would not fling, from soul and brow,  The shade that Feeling should have cast.
Oh! think how it must deepen all  The pangs of wild remorse and pride, To feel that, you can coldly see  The grief, I vainly strive to hide!
The fair, fond girl, who at your side,  Within your soul's dear light, doth live, Could hardly have the heart to chide  The ray that Friendship well might give.
But if you deem it right and just  Blessed as you are in your glad lot, To greet me with that heartless tone,  So let it be! I blame you not!
# So bashful when I spied her!

* "So bashful when I spied her" in Poems (1890)
* "So bashful when I spied her" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# So War has Begun

"So war has begun, they say"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1904), "So War has begun" in Mine and Thine (1904).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "So War has begun" in Poems I.
# Sultan Bahoo The Life and Teachings/Waham (Inward Conversation with The Divine Self)

‘Waham’ refers to Zann (presumption) and Gumaan (thought). ‘Auhaam’ is its plural. In the terminology of Faqr, Waham points to that particular state of the Seeker of Allah in which whatever queries he faces, in both his zahir (outward) or batin (esoteric self), he gets their answers from the Court of Allah Almighty. In other words, Waham means having conversation with Allah Almighty. Sultan-ul-Arifeen Hazrat Sakhi Sultan Bahoo Rehmat-ul-Allah Alayh entitles this conversation as ‘Sayr-e-Auhaam’by Hazrat Sultan Bahoo Rehmat-ul-Allah Alayh.
He Rehmat-ul-Allah Alayh says:
“Auhaam is the name of seeing, listening, speaking and understanding of the soul.” (Sultan-ul-Waham)
"Every Momin (true believer) would converse with Allah and at that time, there would neither be an interpreter nor any intermediator between Allah and man (they would talk to each other directly)." (Bukhari-Muslim)
Allah says, “You remember Me, I will remember you” (Al-Bakra-152). If you remember Me through Auhaam, Ilham, Agahi or Daleel, I will also remember you through these sources.
Sultan-ul-Arifeen says more about Waham:
"Know o seeker! Allah will grant you the complete journey to the soul (Sayr-e-Qalb) through the mediation of Sultan-ul-Waham."
The journey of Auhaam is a great status in the path of Faqr and this is attained after the presence of the heart. This is the blessing which takes the Seeker to the station of annihilation in Allah.
# Sultan Bahoo The Life and Teachings/Title and Spiritual Status

Hazrat Sakhi Sultan Bahoo Rehmat-ul-Allah Alayh is known by the title of “Sultan-ul-Arifeen” among all the Auliya (saints) and Arifeen (knowers). He is stationed at the most elevated and highest status of “Sultan-ul-Faqr (fifth).”
MUSTAFA SANI AND MUJTABA AAKHIR ZAMANI (Mustafa the second and Mujtaba of the last era)
Hazrat Sakhi Sultan Bahoo Rehmat-ul-Allah Alayh proclaimed that:
"Since the Eternal Benevolence has graced me with grandeur, Hazoor Akram Sall’Allahu Alayhi Wa’alihi Wasallam has ordered me to guide everyone, Muslim or Non-Muslim, fortunate or unfortunate, alive or dead, and he has called me ‘Mustafa Sani and Mujtaba Aakhir Zamani’ with his sacred tongue. Both the titles ‘Mustafa’ and ‘Mujtaba’ means “the chosen and the desired one” but these titles are specific for Hazoor Alayhi Salat-o-Salam. He Sall’Allahu Alayhi Wa’alihi Wasallam himself blessed Sultan-ul-Arifeen with the titles of Mustafa Sani (Mustafa the second) and Mujtaba Aakhir Zamani (Mujtaba of the last/later era) which is a symbolic reference to the fact that, when the evil practices will become common in Muslim society, then Sultan-ul-Arifeen’s teachings will be the Light of Righteousness and a special person promoting his teachings will guide the people on the right path. That person will be supported and backed spiritually by Sultan-ul-Arifeen because Sultan-ul-Arifeen himself will not be physically alive in the last era."
Another statement of Sultan-ul-Arifeen which is passed from generation to generation also refers towards this fact that: “When evil will become a common practice, falsehood will overcome the truth and when there will be a large number of sects and groups among the Muslims, every sect will think only itself on the right path and all the others as depraved ones, people will not have the courage to say truth about the wrong and depraved sects. People who will claim to have the knowledge of Batin (inner reality) will claim false sainthood and occupy the seats of shrines to gather wealth by looting people, at that time the fountain of The Divine Light will sprout from my shrine.” This statement also refers that at that time, one of his ardent devotees will kill the evil, revitalize and revive the real Islam under his spiritual guidance, by the promotion of his teachings.
# Sultan Bahoo The Life and Teachings/Urs Pak

The sacred Urs of Sultan-ul-Arifeen Sultan-ul-Faqr Hazrat Sakhi Sultan Bahoo Rehmat-ul-Allah Alayh is celebrated every year on the first Thursday of Jamadi-us-Sani. People come from far off places to join the celebrations.
Sultan-ul-Arifeen Sultan-ul-Faqr Hazrat Sakhi Sultan Bahoo Rehmat-ul-Allah Alayh was drenched in the love of Ahl-e-Bait (family of Holy Prophet Sall’Allahu Alayhi Wa’alihi Wasallam). He used to hold the Urs of the martyrs of Karbala every year in Moharram from 1st till 10th. This tradition is still carried on. Thousands of pilgrims visit the shrine during the first 10 days of Moharram, while in the last three days their number reaches to lacs. In this way, two vast congregations are held every year at his shrine, where a lot of people are benefited.