OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Withenbury v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
72 U.S. 819
Withenbury v. United States
APPEAL from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois.
Several libels were filed in that court for the condemnation, as prize of war, of large quantities of cotton and other property captured on the interior navigable waters of the United States, or on land adjacent thereto. On motion, these libels were consolidated, and various claims were interposed in the consolidated suit for portions of the property libelled. Among these claims was that of Withenbury & Doyle. They denied the validity of the capture, and insisted on their own title to nine hundred and thirty-five bales of the cotton.
Upon hearing of the cause as to this claim, an order was made dismissing the claim, with costs, for which execution was ordered.
From this decree the appeal now pending was taken, and a motion for dismissal was now made, upon the ground that the decree was not final, and therefore was not within the jurisdiction of this court.
A motion of a similar sort was made and argued at the same time in another and similar appeal, Le More v. United States.
Messrs. Ashton, Assistant Attorney-General, and Cushing, in support of the motion:
No disposition has yet been made of the libel, or of the cotton or its proceeds. The suit still remains pending in the District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. In Humiston v. Stainthorp, this court, on a question of what is a final decree, assumed as of course the doctrine of The Palmyra, a case in admiralty, and where Marshell, C. J., says:

## Notes

* 2 Wallace, 106.
10 Wheaton 502; and see Montgomery v. Anderson, 21 Howard, 386.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# With the Night Mail

"It was first published in McClure's Magazine in November 1905, and then in The Windsor Magazine in December 1905. In 1909 it was issued as a popular book by Doubleday, Page & Company, slightly revised and with additional poetry and faux advertisements and notices from the future. It later appeared in the Kipling story collection Actions and reactions (1909)."Warning: template has been deprecated.
* "With the Night Mail" in McClure's Magazine (1905)
* "With the Night Mail" in The Windsor Magazine (1905)
* "With the Night Mail (1909)" published by Doubleday, Page & Company (1909)
* "Actions and Reactions/With the Night Mail" in Actions and Reactions (1909)
# With the Tide

SOMEWHERE I read, in an old book whose name Is gone from me, I read that when the days Of a man are counted, and his business done, There comes up the shore at evening, with the tide, To the place where he sits, a boat -- And in the boat, from the place where he sits, he sees, Dim in the dusk, dim and yet so familiar, The faces of his friends long dead; and knows They come for him, brought in upon the tide, To take him where men go at set of day. Then rising, with his hands in theirs, he goes Between them his last steps, that are the first Of the new life -- and with the ebb they pass, Their shaken sail grown small upon the moon.
Often I thought of this, and pictured me How many a man who lives with throngs about him, Yet straining through the twilight for that boat Shall scarce make out one figure in the stern, And that so faint its features shall perplex him With doubtful memories -- and his heart hang back. But others, rising as they see the sail Increase upon the sunset, hasten down, Hands out and eyes elated; for they see Head over head, crowding from bow to stern, Repeopling their long loneliness with smiles, The faces of their friends; and such go forth Content upon the ebb tide, with safe hearts.
But never To worker summoned when his day was done Did mounting tide bring in such freight of friends As stole to you up the white wintry shingle That night while they that watched you thought you slept. Softly they came, and beached the boat, and gathered In the still cove under the icy stars, Your last-born, and the dear loves of your heart, And all men that have loved right more than ease, And honor above honors; all who gave Free-handed of their best for other men, And thought their giving taking: they who knew Man's natural state is effort, up and up -- All these were there, so great a company Perchance you marveled, wondering what great ship Had brought that throng unnumbered to the cove Where the boys used to beach their light canoe After old happy picnics --
But these, your friends and children, to whose hands Committed, in the silent night you rose And took your last faint steps -- These led you down, O great American, Down to the winter night and the white beach, And there you saw that the huge hull that waited Was not as are the boats of the other dead, Frail craft for a brief passage; no, for this Was first of a long line of towering transports, Storm-worn and ocean-weary every one, The ships you launched, the ships you manned, the ships That now, returning from their sacred quest With the thrice-sacred burden of their dead, Lay waiting there to take you forth with them, Out with the ebb tide, on some farther quest.
# With wild Flowers to a sick Friend

* With wild Flowers to a sick Friend, in Poems 1827
* Wild Flowers, gathered for a Sick Friend, in Voice of Flowers, 1846
# With the Russians in Mongolia/Mongol-Tibetan Treaty

Mongol-Tibetan Treaty
Concluded at Urga on 29th December 1912
Whereas Mongolia and Tibet, having freed themselves from the Manchu dynasty and separated themselves from China, have become independent States, and whereas the two States have always professed one and the same religion, and to the end that their ancient mutual friendships may be strengthened: on the part of the Government of the Sovereign of the Mongolian people—Nikta Biliktu da Lama Rabdan, acting Minister of Foreign Affairs and Assistant Minister General and Manlai Caatyr Bei-Tzu Damdinsurun; on the part of the Dalai Lama, ruler of Tibet—Gujir tsanshib Kanchen Lubsan-Agwan, donir Agwan Choinzin, Tshichamtso, manager of the bank, and Gendun-Galsan, secretary, have agreed on the following:—
Article 1
The Dalai Lama, Sovereign of Tibet, approves of and acknowledges the formation of an independent Mongolian State, and the proclamation on the 9th day of the 11th month of the year of the Swine, of the master of the Yellow Faith Je-tsun Dampa Lama as the Sovereign of the land.
Article 2
The Sovereign of the Mongolian people Je-tsun Dampa Lama approves and acknowledges the formation of an independent State and the proclamation of the Dalai Lama as Sovereign of Tibet.
Article 3
Both States shall take measures, after mutual consideration, for the prosperity of the Buddhist faith.
Article 4
Both States, the Mongolian and the Tibetan, shall henceforth, for all time, afford each other aid against dangers from without and from within.
Article 5
Both States, each on its own territory, shall afford mutual aid to their subjects, travelling officially and privately on religious or on State business.
Article 6
Both States, the Mongolian and the Tibetan, shall, as formerly, carry on mutual trade in the produce of their lands,—in goods, cattle, etc., and likewise open industrial institutions.
Article 7
Should such agreements have been entered into before the conclusion of the present treaty, and should the parties thereto be unable to settle matters amicably, while the loss suffered is great, the payment of such debts may be enforced by the said institutions, but in no case shall the debts concern the Shabinars and Hoshuns.
(Shabinars—people who depend from the Court of Hu-tuk-tu and pay taxes to the Court Department.)
Article 8
Should it be necessary to supplement the articles of this treaty, the Mongolian and Tibetan Governments shall appoint special Plenipotentiaries, who shall come to an Agreement according to the circumstances then existing.
Article 9
Plenipotentiaries of the Dalai Lama, Sovereign of Tibet: Gujir tsanshib Kanchen Lubsan - Agwan Choinzin, Tshichamtso, manager of the Bank of Tibet, and Gendun-Galsan, secretary.
According to the Mongolian chronology, on the 4th day of the 12th month of the second year of "Him who is exalted by all."
According to the chronology of Tibet, in the year of the Water-mouse, on the same month and day.
# Withdrawal of Proclamation 108 of 1985

* related portals: South African copyright law.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This presidential proclamation, number 43 of 1989 published on 31 March 1989 in Government Gazette No. 11812, withdrew Proclamation No. 108 of 1985 which would have brought section 7 of the Copyright Amendment Act, 1984, into force on the following day.
Under the powers vested in me by section 15 of the Copyright Amendment Act, 1984 (Act No. 52 of 1984), I hereby withdraw Proclamation 108 of 1985.
Given under my Hand and the Seal of the Republic of South Africa at Cape Town this Twenty-ninth day of March, One thousand Nine hundred and Eighty-nine.
P. W. Botha, State President.
By Order of the State President-in-Council:
D. W. Steyn, Minister of the Cabinet.
This work is in the public domain because it was created and first published in South Africa and it is an official text of a legislative, administrative or legal nature, or an official translation of such a text.
According to the Copyright Act, 1978, § 12 (8) (a), "No copyright shall subsist in official texts of a legislative, administrative or legal nature, or in official translations of such texts."
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Who's Who in India Supplement 1 (1912)/Asadullah Khan, the Hon'ble Nawab

K. B. KAZI FARZAND AHMAD (78)
KAZI ANWAR AHMAD (79)
​Asadullah Khan, the Hon'ble Nawab, Khan Bahadur (some details of whom appear in Part IV. page 115. of this work) is the present head of the Kambo family of Meerut. who are said to have entered India with Mahmud of Ghazni. Some of his ancestors, notably Nawab Shahbaz Khan, Nawab Dadan Khan and Nawab Khairandesh Khan, were officials in high posts under the Moghal Emperors. The last named, who lived during the reigns of Shah Jehan and Aurangzeb. built a fort at Meerut. the gate of which still exists, and is known as Khairnagar Gate. Nawab Mubarak Ali Khan, grandfather of the present Nawab, was Mir Munshi to Lord Auckland. His son, Nawab Ahmadullah Khan, rendered loyal service during the Mutiny, when he was wounded and twice robbed by rebels. He received the personal title of Nawab in 1885. His son, Nawab Asadullah Khan, is, as was his father, an Honorary Magistrate and Vice-President of the Meerut District and Municipal Boards. He received the title of Khan Bahadur in 1888 and the personal title of Nawab in 1895. He has received three certificates on account of his work on the District and Municipal Boards. He was recently elected to the United Provinces Council. His brother, Islamullah Khan, was for 31 years a Police Officer, serving for many years as Superintendent; the only Indian Superintendent in the United Provinces. His son, Islam Ahmad Khan, B. A., is a Deputy Superintendent of Police, while another son, Islam Nabi Khan, B. A., is a selected candidate for a Deputy Collectorship. The Nawab's third brother, Saifullah Khan, Khan Saheb, is a Deputy Collector at Bijnor, U. P., who received his title for his good work in suppressing plague riots at Cawnpore. The youngest brother of the Nawab, Amirullah Khan. is Secretary of Hapur Municipal Board. Address: Meerut.
# Who's Who in India Supplement 1 (1912)/Aulad Hossein, Saiyid

​Aulad Hossein, Saiyid, Khan Bahadur, Extra Assistant Superintendent. Survey of India, was born on 16th December, 1868, and educated at the Aligarh College, Roorkee Engineering College and Survey of India Training School, Dehra Duh. He is descended from a very old Mussalman family of Muttra, whose ancestors came to India with Mahmud of Ghazni. Saiyid Fazal Hossein, the grandfather of Saiyid Aulad Hossein, was at Jullundur at the outbreak of the Mutiny, and rendered signal service to Government ​at that time, for which he was duly rewarded and thanked. Saiyid Aulad Hossein joined the Survey of India, after passing the required examinations, from the Thomason College, Roorkee, in 1891, and has thus seen twenty years' service in that department of Government. He reached gazetted rank in 1902. His title was conferred on the occasion of the Coronation Durbar of 1911. Address: Dehra Dun, U.P.
# Who's Who in India Supplement 1 (1912)/Ali Husain, M. V. O.

​Ali Husain, M. V. O., Lieutenant in the 2nd Gwalior Infantry, was invested with the insignia of Member of the Fifth Class of the Royal Victorian Order by His Majesty the King-Emperor on the occasion of the recent Coronation Durbar. Address : Gwalior.
# Who's Who in India Supplement 1 (1912)/Ali Naqi Kazi Saiyid

K. B. Himayatuddin Ahmad (83)
K. B. Md. Bakar Khan (84)
K. B. Sd. Ali Naqi (85)
K. B. Mubakak Husain (86)
​Ali Naqi Kazi Saiyid, Khan Bahadur, was born on the 6th June, 1852, and educated at Benares. He is a descendant of Saiyid Masud, who was granted the title of Malik-ul-Saadat by the Emperor Tughlak, in whose reign the old city of Ghazipur was conquered. Saiyid Masud founded a new ​city of Ghazipur, and from that time members of the family have been residing at Naunahra, in that district. A mosque still stands there which was built 300 years ago by his ancestors. Many members of the family have held responsible posts under Government. During the Mutiny, Maulvi Saiyid Imdad, father of Saiyid Ali Naqi, was Tahsildar at Ghazipur, and by his strenuous efforts saved the Government Treasury. The Khan Bahadur has been also in Government employ. As Tahsildar he worked hard during a small-pox epidemical Cawnpore in 1892; while Deputy Collector at Mirzapur he earned the thanks of the Government for his exertions during the famine of [896; he has also been much commended for his action while Deputy Collector at Ghazipur during the plague outbreaks during 1909 and 1911, and has been granted a sanad for these services. He was further rewarded with the title of Khan Bahadur on the occasion of the recent Coronation Durbar. He is an important landholder, paving revenue of Rs. 4,000, and is a First Class Special Magistrate. Address: Naunahra, Ghazipur District. U. P.
# Who's Who in India Supplement 1 (1912)/Ahmad Husain

​Ahmad Husain, M. A., B. L., C. S. I., Private Secretary to His Highness the Nizam and Chief Secretary to the Government of Hyderabad, was invested with the insignia of Companion of the Order of the Star of India on the occasion of the recent Coronation Durbar by His Majesty the King-Emperor. Address: Hyderabad, Deccan.
# Who's Who in India Supplement 1 (1912)/Abdulla Bin Edrus Bin Zain Al Edrus

​Abdulla Bin Edrus Bin Zain Al Edrus, Shams-ul-Ulama Saiyid, Mansab of the Shrine of Edrus, Aden, received his title on the occasion of the recent Coronation Durbar. Address : Aden.
# Who's Who in India Supplement 1 (1912)/Agha Khan — His Highness Agha Sir Sultan Mohammad Shah, G. C. S. I., G. C. I. E.

​Agha Khan — His Highness Agha Sir Sultan Mohammad Shah, G. C. S. I., G. C. I. E., whose biography appears in Part VII, pages 66-67, of this work, was created Knight Grand Commander of the Order of the Star of India by His Majesty the King-Emperor, on the occasion of the recent Coronation Durbar.
# Who's Who in India Supplement 1 (1912)/Ali Imam, the Hon'ble Syed, C.S.I.

​Ali Imam, the Hon'ble Syed, C.S.I., Barrister-at-Law, Law Member of the Viceroy's Executive Council, whose biography appears in Part VIII, pages 114-116, of this work, was invested with the insignia of Companion of the Order of the Star of India by His Majesty the King-Emperor on the occasion of the recent Coronation Durbar.
# Who's Who in India Supplement 1 (1912)/Abdul Ghafur Khan, Nawab

​Abdul Ghafur Khan, Nawab, Khan Bahadur, Khan of Teri,received the personal title of Khan Bahadur on 22nd June, 1897, and the personal title of Nawab on the occasion of the recent Coronation Durbar. Address: Teri, Kohat District, North-West Frontier Province.
# Who's Who in India Supplement 1 (1912)/Abu Nasr Mohammad Yahia

​Abu Nasr Mohammad Yahia, Khan Bahadur, Honorary Magistrate, received his title on the occasion of the recent Coronation Durbar, in recognition of his public services. Address: Sylhet, Assam.
# Wolf v. Usher/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
28 U.S. 269
Wolf v. Usher
This cause came before the court on a certificate of a division between the judges of the circuit court of the district of Rhode Island.
When the case was opened by the counsel for the plaintiff, it was found on inspecting the record, that the particular point on which the judges of the circuit court had differed, was not certified. The whole record had been sent up, and it contained a certificate that the judges of the court had differed in opinion, without a specific statement of what the difference was.
The court refused to take jurisdiction of the cause, and remanded the same to the circuit court of Rhode Island, with directions to proceed therein according to law.
Mr Coxe, for plaintiff; Mr Whipple, for defendant.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wolf v. Weinstein

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 633
Wolf v. Weinstein
Argued: Feb. 20, 1963. --- Decided: April 15, 1963
[Syllabus from pages 633-634 intentionally omitted]
Melvin Lloyd Robbins, New York City, for petitioners.
Alex L. Rosen and Harold Harper, New York City, for respondents.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wolfe v. Hartford Life Annuity Insurance Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
148 U.S. 389
Wolfe v. Hartford Life Annuity Insurance Company
Robert S. Green, for plaintiff in error.
Herman Kobbe, for defendant in error.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE.
The complaint in this case avers that the plaintiff was at the several times mentioned therein, 'and ever since has been, and still is, a resident of the city, county, and state of New York,' but his citizenship is nowhere disclosed by the record.
It is essential, in cases where the jurisdiction depends upon the citizenship of the parties, that such citizenship, or the facts which in legal intendment constitute it, should be distinctly and positively averred in the pleadings, or should appear with equal distinctness in other parts of the record. It is not sufficient that jurisdiction may be inferred argumentatively from the averments. Brown v. Keene, 8 Pet. 112, 115; Insurance Co. v. Rhoads, 119 U.S. 237, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 193; Menard v. Goggan, 121 U.S. 253, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 873.
Judgment reversed, at the costs of plaintiff in error, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wolf v. Usher

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
28 U.S. 269
Wolf v. Usher

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wolfe v. Hartford Life Annuity Insurance Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
148 U.S. 389
Wolfe v. Hartford Life Annuity Insurance Company

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wolfe v. North Carolina

United States Supreme Court
364 U.S. 177
Wolfe v. North Carolina
Argued: Oct. 19 and 20, 1959. --- Decided: June 27, 1960
Mr. J. Alston Atkins, for petitioners.
Mr. Ralph Moody, Raleigh, N.C., for appellee.
Mr. Justice STEWART delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wolfe v. Lewis

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
60 U.S. 280
Wolfe v. Lewis
THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the northern district of Alabama, sitting in equity.
The present appeal was from a collateral decree of the District Court, under the following circumstances:
Lewis had been for many years the attorney of Thomas A. Ronalds, the deceased testator of the present appellants. In the course of his practice, he had filed a bill in chancery to foreclose a mortgage, and thus obtain payment of a debt which was due to his client. The money was voluntarily paid, without a sale, and brought into court. Lewis then claimed a lien upon that fund, not only for his professional services in that particular case, but also for a general balance which he alleged to be due to him from his client, upon a general settlement of accounts between them. At November term, 1848, the court passed the following order:
Order referring matters of account between Lewis and his clients to the Standing Master, to report, &c., at November, 1848 and Order to continue.
'Come the parties by their solicitors, and, by their consent, it is ordered by the court that all matters of account between John H. Lewis, Esq., and his late client, the said Thomas A. Ronalds, deceased, and between the said John H. Lewis and the said John D. Wolfe, executor, and Maria D. L. Ronalds, executrix, of the last will and testament of the said Thomas A. Ronalds, deceased, be referred to the standing master in chancery; and it is further ordered, that said master report a statement thereof, and of all his proceedings relative thereto, to the next term of this court. And it is further ordered, that this cause be continued.'
Under this order, the master went into a detailed examination of all the transactions between Lewis and his client for many preceding years, and made the report which is mentioned in the opinion of the court. From this report, when confirmed by the court, the present appellants appealed.
The case was argued by Mr. Thomas for the appellants, and by Mr. Reverdy Johnson, jr., and Mr. Reverdy Johnson, for the appellee.
The arguments being chiefly directed to the merits of the case, into which this court did not enter, it is not deemed advisable to insert them.
Mr. Justice McLEAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Who's Who in the Far East/CARVIL, Thomas G.

Layout 2
​ CARVIL, Thomas G. (PEKING), 1st class Assistant H.B.M. Consular Service. Appointed Student Interpreter in China, Sept, 4, 1894; acting Vice-Consul at Shanghai, 1899; acting Consul at Wenchow, 1899; promoted 1st class Assistant, April, 5. 1902; Vice-Consul at Tientsin, 1902 and. 1903; acting Consul at Nanking 1903. Address: H.B.M. Legation, Peking, China.
# Who's Who in the Far East/CAVENDISH, Alexander

Layout 2
​ CAVENDISH, Alexander (PENAXG), B.A.; Straits Settlements Civil Service; b. 1879. Educ.: Bedford and Hertford College, Oxford. Appointed cadet in' Straits Settlements Civil Service in Nov., 1901; acting 3rd Magistrate, Penang, 1932; acting 4th Magistrate, Singapore, May, 1903; acting 3rd Magistrate, Singapore, Oct., 1903; acting District Officer, Nibong Tibal, Jan., 1904; acting Superintendent of Education, Penang, April, 1905. Address: Penang, Straits Settlements.