OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# General American Tank Car Corporation v. El Dorado Terminal Company

United States Supreme Court
308 U.S. 422
General American Tank Car Corporation v. El Dorado Terminal Company
Argued: Dec. 12-13, 1939. --- Decided: Jan 2, 1940
See 309 U.S. 694, 60 S.Ct. 465, 84 L.Ed. --.
Mr. Allan P. Matthew, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners.
Mr. W. F. Williamson, of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# For a' that and a' that (Edinburgh)/The Land o' the Leal

THE LAND O' THE LEAL.
FINIS
# For a' that and a' that (Edinburgh)/The Year that's awa

THE YEAR THAT'S AWA.
# For a' that and a' that (Edinburgh)/For a' that and a' that

FOR A' THAT
# For a' that and a' that (Edinburgh)/The Soldier's Gratitude

THE SOLDIER'S GRATITUDE.
# For a' that and a' that (Edinburgh)/The Highland Plaid

THE HIGHLAND PLAID.
# For a' that and a' that (Edinburgh)

For a' that and a' that.
The Soldier's Gratitude.
Lowland Lassie, wilt thou go
The Year that's awa.
The Land o' the Leal
EDINBURGH: PRINTED FOR THE BOOKSELLERS.
* For a' that and a' that
* The Soldier's Gratitude
* The Highland Plaid
* The Year that's awa
* The Land o' the Lea!
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia Public Service Commission v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
283 U.S. 765
Georgia Public Service Commission v. United States
Argued: April 30, 1931. --- Decided: June 1, 1931
Messrs. Edgar Watkins, of Atlanta, Ga., John S. Burchmore, of Chicago, Ill., Mac Asbill, of Atlanta, Ga., and Luther M. Walter, of Chicago, Ill., for appellants.
The Attorney General and Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton, of Washington, D. C., for appellee Interstate Commerce Commission.
[Argument of Counsel from page 766 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Robert C. Alston, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellees Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. and others.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia Railroad Banking Company v. Redwine/Concurrence Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Douglas
United States Supreme Court
342 U.S. 299
Georgia Railroad Banking Company v. Redwine
Argued: Nov. 26, 1951. --- Decided: Jan 28, 1952
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring.
It is my view that appellant's suit is in reality against the State of Georgia to enjoin a breach of contract. It is the same contract that was involved in Wright v. Georgia R. & Banking Co., 216 U.S. 420, 30 S.Ct. 242, 54 L.Ed. 544. In that case the Court held that the Contract Clause of the Constitution barred Georgia from breaching her agreement granting appellant tax immunity by legislative act.
The suit in the Wright case was against a state officer. But the Attorney General appeared and defended the case on the merits. It is clear to me that the Attorney General represented and spoke for the interests of Georgia in the lower court and in this Court. The Georgia Constitution and statutes authorized the Governor to allow the Attorney General to defend suits involving the State's interests. See Ga.Code of 1895, §§ 23, 220; Ga.Const. of 1877, Art. VI, § X, par. II, Code, § 2-3802. The decree that was entered adjudicated the rights of Georgia, declaring her bound by the contract, stating that the Acts of the Georgia Legislature involved in the litigation were 'a valid and binding contract between the State of Georgia' and the present appellant. There were no special circumstances, as in Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731, 67 S.Ct. 1009, 91 L.Ed. 1209, that would keep the suit from being res judicata against the State.
I would conclude that Georgia is bound by the decree in the Wright case. Therefore, relief is now available in the form of an ancillary exercise of the District Court's equity jurisdiction to protect appellant's rights secured under the prior decree. Gunter v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 200 U.S. 273, 26 S.Ct. 252, 50 L.Ed. 477.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia Railroad Banking Company v. Redwine

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
342 U.S. 299
Georgia Railroad Banking Company v. Redwine
Argued: Nov. 26, 1951. --- Decided: Jan 28, 1952
Mr. Furman Smith, Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.
Mr. M. H. Blackshear, Dublin, Ga., for appellee.
Mr. Chief Justice VINSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia Railway Electric Company v. City of Decatur

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Georgia Railway Electric Company v. City of Decatur."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Georgia Railway Electric Company v. City of Decatur (295 U.S. 165)
* Georgia Railway Electric Company v. City of Decatur (297 U.S. 620)
# Georgia Railway Electric Company v. City of Decatur (295 U.S. 165)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
295 U.S. 165
Georgia Railway Electric Company v. City of Decatur
Argued: April 3, 1935. --- Decided: April 29, 1935
Mr. Walter T. Colquitt, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellants.
Mr. James A. Branch, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First and Last

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "First and Last."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* First and Last, a poem by Florence Earle Coates. ("Hope smiles a welcome, if no other smiles,")
* First and Last, a poem by John Cowper Powys. ("Dawn broke over us cool and sweet")
* First and Last by Hilaire Belloc
# First and Last (Belloc)

* On Weighing Anchor
* The Reveillon
* On Cheeses
* The Captain of Industry
* The Inventor
* The Views of England
* The Lunatic
* The Inheritance of Humour
* The Old Gentleman's Opinions
* On Historical Evidence
* The Absence of the Past
* St. Patrick
* The Lost Things
* On the Reading of History
* The Victory
* Reality
* On the Decline of the Book
* Jose Maria de Heredia
* Normandy and the Normans
* The Old Things
* The Battle of Hastings
* The Roman Roads in Picardy
* The Reward of Letters
* The Eye-openers
* The Public
* On Entries
* Companions of Travel
* On the Sources of Rivers
* On Error
* The Great Sight
* The Decline of a State
* On Past Greatness
* Mr. The Duke: The Man of Malplaquet
* The Game of Cards
* "King Lear"
* The Excursion
* The Tide
* On a Great Wind
* The Letter
* The Regret
* The End of the World
# First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. County of Los Angeles/Concurrence Burton

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Burton
* Dissenting Opinion Clark
United States Supreme Court
357 U.S. 545
First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. County of Los Angeles
Argued: April 8, 1958. --- Decided: June 30, 1958
Mr. Justice BURTON concurs in the result.
The CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, with whom Mr. Justice BLACK agrees, concurring.
What I have said in Speiser v. Randall and Prince v. City and County of San Francisco, 357 U.S. 513, 78 S.Ct. 1332, is sufficient for these cases as well. But there is a related ground on which the decision in these Unitarian cases should rest. We know from the record one principle of that church:
'The principles, moral and religious, of the First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles compel it, its members, officers and minister, as a matter of deepest conscience, belief and conviction, to deny power in the state to compel acceptance by it or any other church of this or any other oath of coerced affirmation as to church doctrine, advocacy or beliefs.' We stated in Girouard v. United States, 328 U.S. 61, 69, 66 S.Ct. 826, 829, 90 L.Ed. 1084, 'The test oath is abhorrent to our tradition.' See American Communications Ass'n v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382, 445, 70 S.Ct. 674, 707, 94 L.Ed. 925 (dissenting opinion). The reason for that abhorrence is the supremacy of conscience in our constitutional scheme. As we stated in West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 642, 63 S.Ct. 1178, 1187, 87 L.Ed. 1628, 'If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.'
There is no power in our Government to make one bend his religious scruples to the requirements of this tax law.
Mr. Justice CLARK, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. County of Los Angeles/Dissent Clark

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Burton
* Dissenting Opinion Clark
United States Supreme Court
357 U.S. 545
First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. County of Los Angeles
Argued: April 8, 1958. --- Decided: June 30, 1958
Mr. Justice CLARK, dissenting.
For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in No. 483, Speiser v. Randall, and No. 484, Prince v. City and County of San Francisco, 357 U.S. 513, 78 S.Ct. 1332, I cannot agree either that California law imposes the burden which the Court considers here, or that such a burden in any event would cause the procedure established by § 32 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code to violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Again for reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Speiser and Prince, supra, I find no violation of the constitutional right to freedom of speech.
The majority notes the further contention here that freedom of religion is abridged, but has no occasion to consider it. The California court found that no tenet of petitioners' respective religions embraces the activity which is the subject of the state provisions. Nor does it appear that such activity can be characterized as religious in nature. Cf. Davis v. Beason, 1890, 133 U.S. 333, 10 S.Ct. 299, 33 L.Ed. 637; Reynolds v. United States, 1878, 98 U.S. 145, 25 L.Ed. 244. I would affirm.
For concurring opinion of Mr. Justice BLACK, with whom Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, joins see 357 U.S. 513, 78 S.Ct. 1352.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. County of Los Angeles/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Burton
* Dissenting Opinion Clark
United States Supreme Court
357 U.S. 545
First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. County of Los Angeles
Argued: April 8, 1958. --- Decided: June 30, 1958
These are companion cases to Speiser v. Randall and Prince v. City and County of San Francisco, 357 U.S. 513, 78 S.Ct. 1332. The petitioners claimed the property-tax exemption provided by Art. XIII, § 1 1/2, of the California Constitution for real property and buildings used solely and exclusively for religious worship. The Los Angeles assessor denied the exemptions because each petitioner refused to subscribe, and struck from the prescribed application form, the oath that they did not advocate the overthrow of the Government of the United States and of the State of California by force or violence or other unlawful means nor advocate the support of a foreign government against the United States in the event of hostilities. Each petitioner sued in the Superior Court in and for the County of Los Angeles to recover taxes paid under protest and for declaratory relief. Both contended that the exaction of the oath pursuant to § 19 of Art. XX of the State Constitution and § 32 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code was forbidden by the Federal Constitution. The court upheld the validity of the provisions in the action brought by petitioner First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles, and the Supreme Court of California affirmed. 48 Cal.2d 419, 311 P.2d 508. We granted certiorari. 355 U.S. 853, 78 S.Ct. 86, 2 L.Ed.2d 62. The Superior Court in the action brought by petitioner Valley Unitarian-Universalist Church, Inc., upheld the validity of the provisions under the Federal Constitution but held that § 32 of the Revenue and Taxation Code violated the California Constitution because it excluded or exempted householders from the requirement. The Supreme Court of California reversed, 48 Cal.2d 899, 311 P.2d 540, and we granted certiorari, 355 U.S. 854, 78 S.Ct. 86, 2 L.Ed.2d 62.
In addition to the contentions advanced by the appellants in Speiser v. Randall, the petitioners argue that the provisions are invalid under the Fourteenth Amendment as abridgments of religious freedom and as violations of the principle of separation of church and state. Our disposition of the cases, however, makes consideration of these questions unnecessary. For the reasons expressed in Speiser v. Randall, we hold that the enforcement of § 19 of Art. XX of the State Constitution through proceedures which place the burdens of proof and persuasion of the taxpayer is a violation of due process.
The judgments are reversed and the causes remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Reversed and remanded.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First Unitarian Society of Chicago v. Faulkner

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
91 U.S. 415
First Unitarian Society of Chicago v. Faulkner
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
The plaintiffs below, who are defendants here, brought suit against the First Unitarian Society of Chicago to recover for services rendered as architects in preparing plans for a church-edifice.
Judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs below: whereupon the defendant sued out this writ of error.
The assignment of errors is referred to in the opinion of the court.
Submitted on printed briefs by Mr. Daniel L. Shorey for the plaintiff in error, and by Messrs. R. M. Corwine, Quinton Corwine, & J. A. L. Whittier, contra.
MR. JUSTICE CLIFFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus (First Edition, 1818)/Volume 3

FRANKENSTEIN;
OR,
THE MODERN PROMETHEUS.
IN THREE VOLUMES.
Did I request thee, Maker, from my clay To mould me man? Did I solicit thee From darkness to promote me?—— Paradise Lost.
VOL. III.
London: PRINTED FOR LACKINGTON, HUGHES, HARDING, MAVOR, & JONES, FINSBURY SQUARE.
1818.
Printed by Macdonald and Son, Cloth Fair, London.
* Volume I
* Volume II
* Volume III
    Chapter I
    Chapter II
    Chapter III
    Chapter IV
    Chapter V
    Chapter VI
    Chapter VII
    Walton, in continuation
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Five Russian plays with one from the Ukrainian

Five Russian plays with one from the Ukrainian
Nicholas Eyréinov.
From a Portrait by N. Kulbin
Five Russian plays
with one from the Ukrainian
Translated from the originals with an introduction
by
C. E. Bechhofer
New York E. P. Dutton and Company 1916
Printed in Great Britain.
CONTENTS
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1949, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 74 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Five Pieces of Runic Poetry/The Islandic Originals of the Preceding Poems

Wikisource: At several places an original Norse/Icelandic y has been misprinted as r, for instance in the couplet Jofur sueigde r // Hrunu unda br, where the correct form would be *Jofur sueigde y // Hrunu unda by.
THE
ISLANDIC ORIGINALS
Of the preceding
POEMS.
I.
THE ISLANDIC ORIGINAL
OF THE
Incantation of Hervor.
V. Hervarer Saga, Olaj Verelj. Upsal. 1672. fol. p. 91.
[Ithui bili opnudust haugar, oc var alt ad sia sem logi eirn, oc tha var thetta quedid i hauge Angantyrs:]
[Tha var suerd i hendi Hervarar, oc quad hon:]
II.
THE ISLANDIC ORIGINAL
of the
Dying ode of Regner Lodbrog.
V. Literatur. Runic. Olaj Wormij. Hafniæ 1636. 4to. p. 197.
BIARKAMAL SEM ORTE REGNAR LODBROG.
III.
THE ISLANDIC ORIGINAL
OF THE
Ransome of Egill the Scald.
V. Literatur. Runic. Olaj Wormij Hafniæ 1636. 4to. p. 227.
HOFUDLAUSTI EIGILS SCALLAGRYMS SONAR ISLANDSK KAPPA.
IV.
THE ISLANDIC ORIGINAL
of the
Funeral Song of Hacon.
V. Snorro Sturleson Hist. Regum Septentrion. fol. pag. 163.
HACONARMAL
“Eyvindur Scalldaspillir orti quæthi eitt um fall Haconar kongs, oc sua that huerso honum var fagnat i Valholl; that ero kollut HACONARMAL, oc er thetta upphaf.” Snorro Sturles. Hist.
[A different copy of part of the above poem, containing many variations, may be found in Bartholin’s Causæ contemptæ a Danis mortis. Lib. 2. Cap. 11. p. 520.]
V.
THE ISLANDIC ORIGINAL
OF THE
Complaint of Harold.
V. Bartholin. de causis contemptæ a Danis mortis. Hafniæ 1689. pag. 154.
“I thessum ferdum orti Haralldr gamanvisur, ok ero xvj saman, ok eitt nidrlag at ollom, tho ero herfar ritnar.” Knitlinga Saga.
THE ISLANDIC ORIGINAL of the VERSES quoted pag. 10.
Snorro Sturls. Hist. p. 28.
THE ISLANDIC ORIGINAL of the VERSES quoted pag. 80.
Ol. Wor. Lit. Run. p. 129. Barth. Caus. &c. p. 420.
Cite error: <ref> tags exist for a group named "WS", but no corresponding <references group="WS"/> tag was found
Cite error: <ref> tags exist for a group named "WS", but no corresponding <references group="WS"/> tag was found
# God Is Gone Up on High

God is gone up on high, With a triumphant noise; The clarions of the sky Proclaim the angelic joys! Join all on earth, rejoice and sing; Glory ascribe to glory’s King.
God in the flesh below, For us He reigns above: Let all the nations know Our Jesu’s conquering love! Join all on earth, rejoice and sing; Glory ascribe to glory’s King.
All power to our great Lord Is by the Father given; By angel hosts adored, He reigns supreme in Heav’n: Join all on earth, rejoice and sing; Glory ascribe to glory’s King.
High on His holy seat He bears the righteous sway; His foes beneath His feet Shall sink and die away: Join all on earth, rejoice and sing; Glory ascribe to glory’s King.
His foes and ours are one, Satan, the world, and sin; But He shall tread them down. And bring His kingdom in: Join all on earth, rejoice and sing; Glory ascribe to glory’s King.
Till all the earth, renewed In righteousness divine, With all the hosts of God In one great chorus join, Join all on earth, rejoice and sing; Glory ascribe to glory’s King.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# God Defend New Zealand

* related portals: National anthems.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
"God Defend New Zealand" is one of the national anthems of New Zealand, together with "God Save the Queen". Although they both have equal status, "God Defend New Zealand" is the anthem that is in common use.Warning: template has been deprecated.
God of Nations at Thy feet, In the bonds of love we meet, Hear our voices, we entreat, God defend our free land. Guard Pacific's triple star From the shafts of strife and war, Make her praises heard afar, God defend New Zealand.
Men of every creed and race, Gather here before Thy face, Asking Thee to bless this place, God defend our free land. From dissension, envy, hate, And corruption guard our State, Make our country good and great, God defend New Zealand.
Peace, not war, shall be our boast, But, should foes assail our coast, Make us then a mighty host, God defend our free land. Lord of battles in Thy might, Put our enemies to flight, Let our cause be just and right, God defend New Zealand.
Let our love for Thee increase, May Thy blessings never cease, Give us plenty, give us peace, God defend our free land. From dishonour and from shame, Guard our country's spotless name, Crown her with immortal fame, God defend New Zealand.
May our mountains ever be Freedom's ramparts on the sea, Make us faithful unto Thee, God defend our free land. Guide her in the nation's van, Preaching love and truth to man, Working out Thy glorious plan, God defend New Zealand.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# God Help Kentucky!

God Help Kentucky!
AN ANTHEM.
Lord from thy heavenly throne Thy holy will be done; God help Kentucky! Teach us true liberty, Make us from tyrants free; Let our homes happy be, God help Kentucky!
The wiles of Lincoln’s men, Do thou with might restrain, God help Kentucky! Help thou when power doth press, Aid thou in our distress; Thou whose dread name we bless, God help Kentucky!
Give us staunch honesty, Let our pride manly be; God help Kentucky! Help us to hold the right, Give us both truth and might— Lord of all life and light, God help Kentucky!
Give us the power to stand, Firm for our native land; God save Kentucky! Drive with thy Almighty power The invaders from our door, Let them be seen no more, God save Kentucky!
This work was published before January 1, 1929 and is anonymous or pseudonymous due to unknown authorship. It is in the public domain in the United States as well as countries and areas where the copyright terms of anonymous or pseudonymous works are 95 years or less since publication.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse