OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Drummings on an Empty Skull

First published in The Last of the Trunk och Brev i Urval (2007), where it appears in a letter to Tevis Clyde Smith, no date.
Layout 2
Drummings on an Empty Skull
This work is from the United States and in the public domain because it was not legally published with the permission of the copyright holder before January 1, 2003 and the author died more than 70 years ago. This is a posthumous work and its copyright in certain countries and areas may depend on years since posthumous publication, rather than years since the author's death. Translations or editions published later may be copyrighted.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Drumm-Flato Commission Company v. Edmisson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
208 U.S. 534
Drumm-Flato Commission Company v. Edmisson
Argued: January 27, 1908. --- Decided: February 24, 1908
Messrs. James S. Botsfordy, Buckner F. Deatherage, and Odus G. Young for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Elijah Robinson and Charles Swindall for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Drummond's Administrators v. Magruder Co's Trustees

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
13 U.S. 122
Drummond's Administrators v. Magruder Co's Trustees
Absent. LIVINGSTON, J. STORY, J. and TODD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Drummond v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
324 U.S. 316
Drummond v. United States
Argued: Feb. 7, 8, 1945. --- Decided: March 5, 1945
Mr. Roy St. Lewis, of Washington, D.C., and Mr. Charles R. Gray, of Pawhuska, Okl., for petitioner.
Mr. Roger P. Marquis, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 670

more info.
Signed by President Theodore Roosevelt Friday, July 26, 1907
1907 CSR 126
Mr. William S. Harris may be reinstated as an examiner in the office of the appraiser of merchandise at New York, notwithstanding he has been separated therefrom for more than one year.
The White House,
    July 26, 1907.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 675

more info.
Tern Islands National Wildlife Refuge was delisted by Public Land Order 892, April 15, 1953.
Signed by President Theodore Roosevelt Thursday, August 8, 1907
It is hereby ordered that all small islets, commonly called mud lumps, in or near the mouths of the Mississippi river, Louisiana, located within the area segregated and shown upon the diagram hereto attached and made a part of this order, are hereby reserved and set aside for the use of the Department of Agriculture, as a preserve and breeding ground for native birds. This reservation to be known as Tern Islands Reservation.
The White House,
    August 8, 1907.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 676

more info.
Signed by President Theodore Roosevelt Friday, August 9, 1907
1907 CSR 127
Mr. Frank Huntington may be appointed to a suitable position in the Department of Agriculture, in order that his long editorial experience in the handling of technical or scientific articles may be utilized.
The White House,
    August 9, 1907.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 6715

more info.
See the Notes section for a listing of Executive Orders affected by or related to the issuance of this Executive Order.
Signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt Wednesday, May 23, 1934
Executive Order 6715 of May 23, 1934
Filing of Functional Organization Charts With the Director of the Bureau of the Budget
By virtue of and pursuant to the authority vested in me under title II of the act of June 10, 1921 (ch. 18, 42 Stat. 20), it is hereby ordered as follows:
| (1) | Each executive department, independent establishment, and emergency agency shall file with the Director of the Bureau of the Budget a functional organization chart, indicating its various existing bureaus, divisions, sections, etc., and containing a description of the functions respectively performed, and shall file such additional charts from time to time, as may be necessary to show all changes made therein. |
| (2) | Every executive department, independent establishment, and emergency agency hereafter created shall within 5 days after the appointment of the head thereof file a preliminary functional organization chart with the Director of the Bureau of the Budget. |
| (3) | The Director of the Bureau of the Budget is hereby authorized to prescribe, subject to the approval of the President, such rules and regulations as will indicate the information desired and the form of chart to be furnished. |
The White House,
May 23, 1934.

## Notes

Shortcut: WS:USEO

### See Related

* None Ascertained

### Authority Repealed by

* Public Law 97-258, 96 Stat. 1073.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 672

more info.
Amends Executive Order 352-B, September 21, 1905.
Signed by President Theodore Roosevelt Thursday, August 1, 1907
General Orders No. 175, War Dept., August 23, 1907
The Executive Order of September 21, 1905 (G.O., No. 161, War Department, September 30, 1905), by which there were reserved for the use of the Signal Corps, U.S. Army, in the matter of the operation of military cable and telegraph lines in Alaska, certain public lands at Safety Harbor and Old Woman, Alaska, is hereby modified, so far as it relates to the reservation at Old Woman, so that said reservation, erroneously described in said order, shall comprise all public lands, and those only, included within metes and bounds as follows:
    Beginning at a spruce stump 4 feet high located on the northeast bank of a slough of the Old Woman River, marked "I. S. U. S. M. R."; thence true east 790 feet to a stake 4 feet high; thence true north 1,000 feet to a stake 4 feet high; thence true west 1,060 feet to a stake 4 feet high, the northwest corner of the original reservation; thence continuing true west 400 feet, more or less, to a stake; thence true south 560 feet, more or less, to a stake; thence true east 400 feet, more or less, to a stake; thence true south 440 feet, more or less, to a stake 4 feet high, the southwest corner of the original reservation; thence true east 270 feet to point of beginning: containing 29.48 acres, more or less. The bearings are true; magnetic variation (1907) 19° 30′ east.
The White House,
    August 1, 1907.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 669

more info.
Signed by President Theodore Roosevelt Thursday, July 25, 1907
1907 CSR 126
Miss Alice V. Fought may be appointed a clerk in the Treasury Department without compliance with civil-service rules.
The White House,
    July 25, 1907.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 671

more info.
Signed by President Theodore Roosevelt Monday, July 29, 1907
1907 CSR 127
Mr. Harry T. Paterson, who was appointed through competitive examination and served for several years in the Reclamation Service, may be appointed as a junior civil engineer in the Engineer Department at large without reference to the limitations respecting reinstatement and transfer.
The White House,
    July 29, 1907.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 673

more info.
Revokes Executive Order 649, June 11, 1907.
Signed by President Theodore Roosevelt Saturday, August 3, 1907
1907 CSR 127
The Executive Order of June 11, 1907, providing for the transfer of Mr. George S. Fox from the Isthmian Canal Service to the Federal classified service, is hereby revoked.
The White House,
    August 3, 1907.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner)/The Gallant Tin Soldier

Illustrator: Hans Tegner; Original: Den standhaftige Tinsoldat (Danish)
THE GALLANT TIN SOLDIER
ALL THE TIN SOLDIERS WERE MADE FROM THE SAME OLD TIN SPOON.
​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/489 ​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/490 ​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/491 ​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/493 ​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/494
# Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner)/Little Claus and Big Claus

Illustrator: Hans Tegner
LITTLE CLAUS AND BIG CLAUS
THERE WERE TWO MEN IN THE SAME TOWN WHO HAD THE SAME NAME.
​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/387 ​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/388 ​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/389 ​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/390 ​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/391 ​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/392 ​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/393 ​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/395 ​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/396 ​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/397 ​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/398
# Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner)/The Garden of Paradise

Illustrator: Hans Tegner
THE GARDEN OF PARADISE
"WE SHALL SOON REACH THE GARDEN OF PARADISE," SAID THE EAST WIND.
THEN THE FAIRY OF PARADISE APPEARED. SHE WAS YOUNG AND BEAUTIFUL, AND WAS ACCOMPANIED BY THE MOST BEAUTIFUL MAIDENS.
THERE SHE WAS LYING ASLEEP AND LOOKING AS BEAUTIFUL AS ONLY THE FAIRY IN THE GARDEN OF PARADISE CAN LOOK.
​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/469 ​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/470
# Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner)/It Is Quite True!

Illustrator: Hans Tegner
IT IS QUITE TRUE!
THERE IS A HEN WHO HAS PLUCKED OUT ALL HEK FEATHERS FOR THE SAKE OF THE COCK !
IT IS QUITE TRUE!
"IT is a terrible story said a hen who belonged to a quarter of the town where the affair had not happened. "It is a terrible story from a poultry-yard! I dare not sleep by myself to-night. It is a good thing there are so many of us together on the perch." And then she began telling the story, which made the feathers of the hens stand on end and the cock drop its comb. It is quite true!
​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/432 ​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/433 ​Page:Fairy tales and stories (Andersen, Tegner).djvu/434
# Epictetus, the Discourses as reported by Arrian, the Manual, and Fragments/Book 1/Chapter 13

Layout 1
CHAPTER XIII
How may each several thing be done acceptably to the gods?
Now when someone asked him how it is possible to eat acceptably to the gods, he said, If it is done justly and graciously and fairly and restrainedly and decently, is it not also done acceptably to the gods? And when you have asked for warm water and the slave does not heed you; or if he does heed you but brings in tepid water; or if he is not even to be found in the house, then to refrain from anger and not to explode, is not this acceptable to the gods?—How, then, can a man bear with such persons?—Slave, will you not bear with your own brother, who has Zeus as his progenitor and is, as it were, a son born of the same seed as yourself and of the same sowing from above; but if you have been stationed in a like position above others, will you forthwith set yourself up as a tyrant? Do you not remember what you are, and over whom you rule—that they are kinsmen, that they are brothers by nature, that they are the offspring of Zeus?$^5$—But I have a deed of sale for them, and they have none for me.—Do you see whither you bend your gaze, that it is to ​the earth, that it is to the pit, that it is to these wretched laws of ours, the laws of the dead, and that it is not to the laws of the gods that you look?
# Epictetus, the Discourses as reported by Arrian, the Manual, and Fragments/Book 1/Chapter 15

Layout 1
CHAPTER XV
What does philosophy profess?
When someone consulted Epictetus as to how he could persuade his brother to cease being angry with him, he replied, Philosophy does not profess to secure for man any external possession. Otherwise it would be undertaking something that lies outside its proper subject-matter. For as wood is the material of the carpenter, bronze that of the statuary, just so each man's own life is the subject-matter of the art of living.—Well, what about my brother's life?—That again is the subject-matter of his own art of living, but with respect to your art of living it comes under the category of externals, like a farm, like health, like good repute. Philosophy promises none of these things, but rather, "In every circumstance I will keep the governing principle in a state of accord with nature."—Whose governing principle?—"His in whom I am."$^5$—How, then, shall I keep my brother from being angry at me?—Bring him to me and I will tell him, but I have nothing to say to you on the subject of his anger.
And when the man who was consulting him said. What I seek to know is this, how, even if my brother refuses to be reconciled with me, I may yet be in accord with nature, Epictetus replied: Nothing great comes into being all at once; why, not even does the bunch of grapes, or a fig. If you say to me now, "I want a fig," I shall answer, "That requires time." Let the tree blossom first, then put forth its fruit, and finally let the fruit ripen. Now although the ​fruit of even a fig-tree is not brought to perfection all at once and in a single hour, would you still seek to secure the fruit of a man's mind in so short a while and so easily? Do not expect it, not even if I should tell you so myself.
# Ex parte Mayfield

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
141 U.S. 107
Ex parte Mayfield
[Statement of Case from pages 107-108 intentionally omitted]
Van H. Manning and Duane E. Fox, for petitioner.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 108-111 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice BROWN, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Many

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
55 U.S. 24
Ex parte Many
Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Massachusetts/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
197 U.S. 482
Ex parte Massachusetts
Argued: February 27, 28, 1905. --- Decided: April 10, 1905
This court has no original jurisdiction over this controversy, in any view, because it is not a controversy between a state and a citizen of another state. Hepburn v. Ellzey, 2 Cranch, 445, 2 L. ed. 332; Hooe v. Jamieson, 166 U.S. 395, 41 L. ed. 1049, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 596. And it has not appellate jurisdiction, because, since the passage of the act of February 9, 1893 (27 Stat. at L. 434, chap. 74), establishing the court of appeals for the District of Columbia, this court, generally speaking, and not including cases arising under the bankruptcy law (Audubon v. Shufeldt, 181 U.S. 575, 45 L. ed. 1009, 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 735), cannot review the judgments and decrees of the supreme court of the District, directly by appeal or writ of error.
By § 716 of the Revised Statutes, U.S.C.omp. Stat. 1901, p. 580, this court and the circuit and the district courts 'have power to issue all writs not specially provided for by statute, which may be necessary for the exercise of their respective jurisdictions, and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.'
By § 688, U.S.C.omp. Stat. 1901, p. 565, prohibition may issue 'to the district courts when proceeding as courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction,' but there is no similar provision in respect of other courts. And it has been repeatedly held, as to the circuit courts, that they have no power, under § 716, to issue writs of prohibition and mandamus, except when necessary in the exercise of their existing jurisdiction. Bath County v. Amy, 13 Wall. 248, 20 L. ed. 541; M'Clung v. Silliman, 6 Wheat. 601, 5 L. ed. 341.
This is equally true of this court; that is to say, that in cases over which we possess neither original nor appellate jurisdiction we cannot grant prohibition or mandamus or certiorari as ancillary thereto.
Rule discharged; petition denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte McCardle

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Ex parte McCardle."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Ex parte McCardle (73 U.S. 318)
* Ex parte McCardle (74 U.S. 506)
# Ex parte Many/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
55 U.S. 24
Ex parte Many
A motion has been made for a rule on the District Judge of the Massachusetts District, to show cause why he should not proceed to adjudicate and allow the petitioner's costs in an action at law in the Circuit Court. The rule is moved for upon the District Judge, because he alone was holding the Circuit Court when the decision was made which has given rise to this application.
The case is this: Many recovered a judgment in the Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts against Sizer and others, for the infringement of a patent right. The judgment was entered in the following words:--
'It is thereupon considered by the court, that the said William V. Many recover against the said George W. and Henry Sizer the sum of seventeen hundred and thirty-three dollars and seventy-five cents damages and costs of suit taxed at _____.'
The judgment was rendered in 1848; and upon writ of error brought by the defendants, it was affirmed in this court at December term, 1851. The costs were not taxed in the Circuit Court before the removal, and the blank left for them remained unfilled when the judgment was affirmed. The usual mandate issued to the Circuit Court to carry to judgment into execution, and the blank space for costs was necessarily left in the mandate, in order to conform to the judgment of the court below, as it appeared in the transcript transmitted to this court.
Upon the return of the case to the Circuit Court, the counsel for the plaintiff moved that his costs be taxed by the clerk as and for the October term, 1848, and that an order be made amending the record of the judgment of the Circuit Court so as to insert therein the amount of the taxation, and that an execution on the judgment so amended be issued.
The court refused to allow the amendment to be made, and overruled the motion. And we think its judgment, whether it be correct or not, cannot be revised in the form of proceeding moved for on behalf of the plaintiff. The decision of the Circuit Court was not a mere ministerial act. It was the decision of a court of competent jurisdiction made in the exercise of judicial authority and discretion. This court might unquestionably issue a mandamus to the court below to proceed to judgment. But in this case the court has proceeded to judgment, upon the question submitted for its decision. And whether that judgment be erroneous or not, this court has not jurisdiction to re examine it in a proceeding by mandamus.
The motion for a rule to show cause must therefore be overruled for want of jurisdiction.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse