OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# States of Christian Life and Vocation, According to the Doctors and Theologians of the Church/Part 2/Section 2/Prayers

PRAYERS.
" I exhort you to say, during nine days, the following prayer," said St. Liguori to a young woman who consulted him on her vocation :
" O Lord Jesus Christ, who didst die to save me ! I beseech thee, by the merits of thy blood, to give me the light and strength that I need, in order to choose the state which shall be most conducive to my salvation. " And them, O my loving mother, Mary ever Virgin ! obtain for me this grace through thy powerful intercession. "
"I wish you," wrote the same holy doctor to a young man, " I wish you to say this short prayer which I send you:
" O my God ! I am a wretched creature, that in past times has despised thee. To-day, however, I esteem and love thee above all things, and I wish never more to love any one or any thing but thee. Thou wishest to have me wholly for thyself, and I wish to belong altogether to thee. Speak, O Lord ! thy servant heareth. Make known to me what thou askest of me : my wish is to conform entirely to thy divine will. Especially do I beg of thee to let me know in what state thou wiliest that I should serve thee. "
Lastly, St. Liguori gives this advice to souls that are called to the religious state : " In all your prayers, at all your communions, you should remember to renew to God the offering of yourselves, saying :
" Here I am, O Lord ! I no longer belong to myself: I am wholly thine. I have already given myself to thee, and I now give myself to thee again. Deign to accept my offering, give me strength to be faithful to thee, and to retire as soon as possible into thy holy house. "

## Footnotes

* ↑ Ascetic Works, ed. Casterinann, vol. 3, pp. 511, 512.
* ↑ lbid., p. 309.
* ↑ Ibid., p. 422.
# States of Christian Life and Vocation, According to the Doctors and Theologians of the Church/Preface

THE few years that make up what is called a man's life, are of the utmost importance. They determine his entire eternity. Our Father in Heaven takes a deep interest in them, and does not wish them to be a failure. On our part, then, we should not misuse these years, and much less should we trifle them away. A pagan emperor mourned the loss even of one day. St. Paul tells us (Gal. vi, 10) that all our time is given to us to work good.
The proper way, therefore, for us to live, is to do God's ever-holy will in this world; to embrace that state and form of life which Divine Providence has traced out for us. When we live where God wants us to be, graces are proportioned to difficulties, and the current of life flows on as smoothly as we can expect it to do in our present condition.
The little work, of which we here present a translation, teaches us admirably how to follow and carry out the guidance of God during our sojourn on this earth. The original has been highly commended by several French bishops. It was published with the approbation of the Master of the Sacred Palace. It even merited for its learned author a most complimentary letter from the immortal Pius IX.
Father Berthier's teaching is drawn from the most reliable Catholic sources. We are not astonished that his work has gone through several editions in France. We hope that the same success awaits it in its English dress. In all probability, this translation is not what it could be in abler hands; but any defect in that line cannot detract from the intrinsic worth of the book itself. In our humble opinion, Father Berthier has given us one of the best, if not the very best, of books, upon the grave subject of vocation.
We trust that this modest translation will be instrumental in spreading more correct views on the Christian Life, and in preventing many from rushing into a state of life from unworthy motives, and especially without consulting God. Father Berthier's book will be a light to the clergy and the laity; for it will put the various states clearly before the mind of the latter, and enable the former to be good guides for those who ask their advice when there is question of making a choice.
# Statesman

is a Socratic dialogue written by Plato. The text depicts a conversation among Socrates, the mathematician Theodorus, another person named Socrates (referred to as "Socrates the Younger"), and an unnamed philosopher from Elea referred to as "the Stranger" (ξένος, xénos).
English-language translations of el:Politikós include:
* Politicus, trans. by Thomas Taylor (1804) (transcription project)
* The Statesman, trans. by George Burges (1850) (transcription project)
* Statesman, trans. by Benjamin Jowett (1892)
* Politicus, trans. by J. A. Stewart (1905) (transcription project)
# States of Christian Life and Vocation, According to the Doctors and Theologians of the Church/Part 2/Section 2/Conclusion
## Conclusion.

In the second part of this book we have furnished rules for the choice of a state of life ; in the first, we attempted to draw out an exact idea of the various states of the Christian life. Our task is therefore at an end. Blessed be God who gave us time and strength to begin it and bring it to a close. O Lord ! may this humble work promote thy glory ! We ask this of thee through Mary, thy divine mother, and our mother also. May all who shall read these pages be enlightened by thy light and touched by thy grace, so that they may devote to thy service, every one in his way, the life which they hold from thee ! Holy doctors ! whose doctrine we have borrowed, fertilize by your protection the instruction which you have given us. May it be understood by all whom the prejudices of the world deceive and lead astray !
# Squire v. Capoeman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Reed
United States Supreme Court
351 U.S. 1
Squire v. Capoeman
Argued: Jan. 19, 1956. --- Decided: April 23, 1956
Mr.Charles F. Barber, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. John W. Bragun, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sra v. Minnesota

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
327 U.S. 558
Sra v. Minnesota
Argued: Jan. 3, 1946. --- Decided: March 25, 1946
Mr.Roland J. Faricy, of St. Paul, Minn., for petitioner.
Mr. Andrew R. Bratter, of St. Paul, Minn., for respondent.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Squire v. Capoeman/Dissent Reed

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Reed
United States Supreme Court
351 U.S. 1
Squire v. Capoeman
Argued: Jan. 19, 1956. --- Decided: April 23, 1956
Mr. Justice REED, dissenting.
My view is that the sale price of the timber in excess of its market value on March 1, 1913, was a capital gain, subject to federal income tax. Jones v. Taunah, 10 Cir., 186 F.2d 445. Cf. Choteau v. Burnet, 283 U.S. 691, 51 S.Ct. 598, 75 L.Ed. 1353; Superintendent of Five Civilized Tribes, etc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 295 U.S. 418, 55 S.Ct. 820, 79 L.Ed. 1517. The gain is taxable income like the value of annual crops.
Mr. Justice HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Stories by Foreign Authors (French II)

Stories by Foreign Authors, Vol. 2 Fifty-one tales in ten volumes, comprising a careful selection of the best Continental short stories by contemporary or nearly contemporary writers, published by Charles Scribner's Sons, New York
FRANÇOIS COPPÉE
STORIES BY
FOREIGN AUTHORS
FRENCH
| THE SUBSTITUTE | By François Coppée |
| THE ATTACK ON THE MILL | By Emile Zola |
| THE VIRGIN'S GOD-CHILD | By Emile Souvestre |
| THE SEMPSTRESS' STORY | By Gustave Droz |
| THE VENUS OF ILLE | By Prosper Mérimée |
NEW YORK
CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS
Copyright, 1898, by Charles Scribner's Sons
PUBLISHERS' NOTE
The translations in this volume, where previously published, are used by arrangement with the owners of the copyrights (as specified at the beginning of each story). Translations made especially for the series are covered by its general copyright. All rights in both classes are reserved.
CONTENTS
| | | page |
| The Substitute | François Coppée | 11 |
| The Attack on the Mill | Emile Zola | 31 |
| The Virgin's God-Child | Emile Souvestre | 85 |
| The Sempstress' Story | Gustave Droz | 131 |
| The Venus of Ille | Prosper Mérimée | 147 |
# Stirring Science Stories/March 1942/Fantasy and the War

Fantasy and the War
Just after the editors had completed this issue of Stirring Science Stories, the news came of the sudden assault upon our nation. In the days that followed, America gave thought to the new emergency. So, likewise, did the clubs of Science-fiction readers for shortly we received the following communication from John B. Michel, Director of the famous Futurian Society. We pass it on to you:—
"The Futurian Society of New York declares its unswerving sympathy and loyalty to the great struggle being carried on by four-fifths of the population of the Earth headed by the alliance of the United States, Great Britain, the Soviet Union and China against the barbarian thrust of the Nazi-Fascist-Japanese Axis It makes this declaration in the firm conviction, that the further progress of science and civilization upon which the visions and dreams of science-fiction are mainly based is dependent entirely upon an Allied victory. The shape of the Future is being decided on the field of battle of the Present. Science-fiction readers, writers and enthusiasts have no other possible choice but to do all in their power to aid and speed the triumph of civilization over fascism. To this end, the Futurian Society appeals to all science-fiction clubs, publications and readers to issue similar declarations and to do all in their power to help the United States to absolute victory."
The editors and publishers of this and the other magazines of the Manhattan. Fiction group are completely in agreement. Fantasy can play a good part by helping men relax and keeping alive the right to dream. Stirring Science Stories will do its share to that end.
# Stirring Science Stories/March 1942

[Advertisements]
* Whaddya
* Read?
Movie Detective 10¢
Exciting new detective movies in story form
Movie Western 10¢
The newest western movies thrillingly fictionized
Movie Love 10¢
Romantic fiction and facts about Hollywood and the whole world of glamor
At Your Newsstand Now!
PAST, PRESENT AND FUTERE
In response to your insistent demands and the enthusiasm with which our first issues were greeted, we have brought back Stirring Science Stories which you have acclaimed as a leader in fantasy.
We have changed the magazine for the better. We give you larger sized pages and a different format in accord with the 1942 growth of the popular fiction field. We are not allowing ourselves to be left behind in the past—we go forward with the times. We are giving you as much for your money as ever before. The new size permits us to give you that but it permits us to do more. We Are Now Monthly! You all asked for it and we have complied!
So from now on watch for Stirring Science Stories on your stands each month. Each issue better and better, each issue tops in both science-fiction and fantasy and still the only magazine that covers the entire fantastic field.
In the April issue we present a brilliant array of fiction by your favorite writers. Headed by one of the most unusual weird novelettes of the year "The Enemy" by Hugh Raymond and Mallory Kent. It's a remarkable picturization of a strange grim future—a memory and a warning that will linger for years.
If you travelled into the future a million years, you would expect to find the world vastly changed. Suppose you found it much as it is today? That's what happened to one man who went forward to "The Millionth Year" and the mystery he solved makes enthralling reading. Arthur Cooke tells the yarn in the next issue.
Watch for the April Issue of Stirring Science Stories. At your newsstand March 1st.
Stirring Science Fiction
Stirring Fantasy Fiction
Cover by Hannes Bok
Interior illustrations by Bok, Dolgov, Hall
Donald A. Wollheim, Editor
All characters mentioned in the stories herein are fictitious, and any similarity to actual persons living or dead is accidental.
Published monthly by Manhattan Fiction Publications. Editorial and Executive Offices, 366 Broadway, New York, N. Y. Copyright 1942 by Manhattan Fiction Publications. Manuscripts should be accompanied by self-addressed, stamped envelope, and are submitted at the author's risk. Yearly subscription $1.80. Single copies 15c. Printed in U.S.A.
[Advertisements]
(Upload an image to replace this placeholder.)
(Upload an image to replace this placeholder.)
# Scheme: An Interpreter for Extended Lambda Calculus/Acknowledgements
## AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements

This paper would not have happened if Sussman had not been forced to think about lambda calculus by having to teach 6.031, nor would it have happened had not Steele been forced to understand PLASMA by morbid curiosity.
This work developed out of an initial attempt to understand the actorness of actors. Steele thought he understood it, but couldn't explain it; Sussman suggested the experimental approach of actually building an "ACTORS interpreter". This interpreter attempted to intermix the use of actors and LISP lambda expressions in a clean manner. When it was completed, we discovered that the "actors" and the lambda expressions were identical in implementation. Once we had discovered this, all the rest fell into place, and it was only natural to begin thinking about actors in terms of lambda calculus. The original interpreter was call-by-name for various reasons having to do with 6.031; we subsequently experimentally discovered how call-by-name screws iteration, and rewrote it to use call-by-value. Note well that we did not bring forth a clean implementation in one brilliant flash of understanding; we used an experimental and highly empirical approach to bootstrap our knowledge.
We wish to thank the staff of 6.031, Mike Dertouzos, and Steve Ward, for precipitating this intellectual adventure. Carl Hewitt spent many hours explaining the innards and outards of PLASMA to Steele over the course of several months; Marilyn McClennan was also helpful in this respect. Brian Smith and Richard Zippel helped a lot. We wish to thank Seymour Papert, Ben Kuipers, Marvin Minsky, and Vaughn Pratt for their excellent suggestions.
# Schell v. Dodge/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
107 U.S. 629
Schell v. Dodge
These are all suits in each of which a judgment was rendered against a late collector of customs for the recovery of money paid as duties. There has been a certificate of probable cause in each. Writs of error to this court were brought by direction of the government in each case. When the cases were reached in order on the docket of this court at October term, 1881, the solicitor general, on the part of the government, moved that the writs of error be dismissed, as presenting no question which he desired to argue. This was done. There was no affirmance of the judgments below, and the judgments and mandates of this court contained no direction as to interest on the judgments below during the time the writs of error were pending. Those judgments were rendered in 1878, and suspended by the writs of error for over three years. In the Dodge case the mandate was issued, but has never been presented to the court below. In the other cases, the mandates were issued and presented to the court below, and orders for judgment were entered thereon. Counsel for the defendants in error in the Dodge case were present in this court when that case was so dismissed, but in the other cases no counsel for the defendants in error was present, and the motions to dismiss were made without their knowledge, and the mandates were not issued till after the close of the term.
The defendants in error now apply to this court to correct the judgments and mandates in these cases so as to award to them interest as such or as damages for delay. There is no doubt that, if the defendants in error in these cases had in season asked for judgments of affirmance, their applications would have been granted, and interest would have been allowed, in accordance with the decision just announced in Cochran v. Schell, ante, 827. But the difficulty now is that we have no power to vary the judgments or the mandates after the close of the term, no especial right to do so in these cases having been reserved. It has always been held by this court that it has no power, after the term has passed, and a cause has been dismissed or otherwise finally disposed of here, to alter its judgment in such a particular as that now asked for, the change of a dismissal of a writ of error, with its legal consequences, to an affirmance of the judgment below, with its legal consequences, and not an error of mere form, or a clerical error, or a misprision of the clerk, or the like. Jackson v. Ashton, 10 Pet. 480; Bank U.S. v. Moss, 6 How. 31, 38.
The applications are denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Schell v. Fauch E

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
138 U.S. 562
Schell v. Fauch E
[Statement of Case from pages 562-564 intentionally omitted]
Asst. Atty. Gen. Parker, for plaintiffs in error.
S. F. Phillips and Frederic D. McKenney, for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice BROWN, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Schell v. Dodge

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
107 U.S. 629
Schell v. Dodge
Sol. Gen. Phillips, for plaintiffs in error.
John E. Parsons and Geo. Bliss, for defendants in error.
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Scheme: An Interpreter for Extended Lambda Calculus

AI Memo 349, the first of the Lambda Papers.
This paper gave the original definition and implementation of the Scheme programming language, a Lisp dialect with full lexical closure based on the lambda calculus, and demonstrated how it can be used to reason about the semantics of tail recursive iteration and continuation-passing style.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. This page must provide all available authorship information.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Scheme: An Interpreter for Extended Lambda Calculus/Abstract
## AbstractAbstract

Inspired by ACTORS [Greif and Hewitt] [Smith and Hewitt], we have implemented an interpreter for a LISP-like language, SCHEME, based on the lambda calculus [Church], but extended for side effects, multiprocessing, and process synchronization. The purpose of this implementation is tutorial. We wish to:
* alleviate the confusion caused by Micro-PLANNER, CONNIVER, etc. by clarifying the embedding of non-recursive control structures in a recursive host language like LISP.
* explain how to use these control structures, independent of such issues as pattern matching and data base manipulation.
* have a simple concrete experimental domain for certain issues of programming semantics and style.
This paper is organized into sections. The first section is a short "reference manual" containing specifications for all the unusual features of SCHEME. Next, we present a sequence of programming examples which illustrate various programming styles, and how to use them. This will raise certain issues of semantics which we will try to clarify with lambda calculus in the third section. In the fourth section we will give a general discussion of the issues facing an implementor of an interpreter for a language based on lambda calculus. Finally, we will present a completely annotated interpreter for SCHEME, written in MacLISP [Moon], to acquaint programmers with the tricks of the trade of implementing non-recursive control structures in a recursive language like LISP.
This report describes research done at the Artificial Intelligence Laboratory of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Support for the laboratory's artificial intelligence research is provided in part by the Advanced Research Projects Agency of the Department of Defense under Office of Naval Research contract N00014-75-C-0643.
* ↑ [Greif and Hewitt] Greif, Irene and Hewitt, Carl. Actor Semantics of Planner-73. Working Paper 81, MIT AI Lab (Cambridge, 1975).
* ↑ [Smith and Hewitt] Smith, Brian C. and Hewitt, Carl. A PLASMA Primer (draft). MIT AI Lab (Cambridge, October 1975).
* ↑ [Church] Church, Alonzo. The Calculi of Lambda Conversion. Annals of Mathematics Studies Number 6. Princeton University Press (Princeton, 1941). Reprinted by Klaus Reprint Corp. (New York, 1965).
* ↑ [Moon] Moon, David A. MACLISP Reference Manual, Revision 0. Project MAC, MIT (Cambridge, April 1974).