# Mir Hardware Heritage/Part 2 - Almaz, Salyut, and Mir

| Part 2 Almaz, Salyut, and Mir 2.1 Overview2.1 Overview Figure 2-1 is a space station family tree depicting the evolutionary relationships described in this section. 2.1.1 Early Concepts (1903, 1962)2.1.1 Early Concepts (1903, 1962) The space station concept is very old in Russia. Space pioneer Konstantin Tsiolkovskii wrote about space stations as early as 1903. The first space station event relevant to this discussion occurred in March 1962, when Sergei Korolev’s OKB-1 design bureau (ancestor of RKK Energia–until recently, NPO Energia) produced a report called “Complex for the Assembly of Space Vehicles in Artificial Earth Satellite Orbit (the Soyuz).” The report was | largely concerned with assembly in Earth orbit of a vehicle for circumlunar flight, but also described a small station made up of independently launched modules. Three cosmonauts were to reach the station aboard a manned transport spacecraft called Siber (or Sever) (“north”), shown in figure 2-2. They would live in a habitation module and observe Earth from a “sciencepackage” module. Korolev’s Vostok rocket (a converted ICBM) was tapped to launch both Siber and the station modules. In 1965, Korolev proposed a 90-ton space station to be launched by the N-1 rocket. It was to have had a docking module with ports for four Soyuz spacecraft. 2.1.2 Almaz: Conception (1964-1967)2.1.2 Almaz: Conception (1964-1967) However, the Korolev organization was preoccupied with preparing the Soviet entry in the Moon race with the United States. The task of developing the first space station fell to V. N. Chelomei’s OKB-52 organization (ancestor of NPO Mashinostroyeniye). On October | 12, 1964, Chelomei called upon his staff to develop a military station for two to three cosmonauts, with a design life of 1 to 2 years. They designed an integrated system: a single-launch space station dubbed Almaz (“diamond”) and a Transport Logistics Spacecraft (Russian acronym TKS) for reaching it (see section 3.3). Chelomei’s three-stage Proton booster would launch them both. Almaz was to be equipped with a crew capsule, radar remotesensing apparatus for imaging the Earth’s surface, cameras, two reentry capsules for returning data to Earth, and an antiaircraft cannon to defend against American attack. An interdepartmental commission approved the system in 1967. OKB-52 and its Branch No. 1 (ancestor of KB Salyut) divided responsibility for the system’s components. 2.1.3 First Space Stations (1970-1974)2.1.3 First Space Stations (1970-1974) Work on the Almaz stations proceeded apace, but the subsystems rapidly fell behind the original schedule. In February 1970, the Soviet Ministry of General Machine Building decided to transfer Almaz hardware and plans from Chelomei’s bureau to Korolev’s bureau. This was done in hopes it would permit the Soviet Union to launch a space station ahead of the U.S. Skylab project. The transfer was less physical than administrative, because both Energia Soyuz and Mashinostroyeniye Almaz hardware were assembled in the Krunichev plant. Using Soyuz hardware for subsystems and Almaz hardware for large components such as the hull, Korolev’s bureau and OKB-52 Branch No. 1 completed the world’s first space station, Long-Duration Station-1 (Russian acronym DOS-1), in just 12 months. DOS-1 was called Zarya (“dawn”) 1 until shortly before its launch, when it was realized that |
| 12, 1964, Chelomei called upon his staff to develop a military station for two to three cosmonauts, with a design life of 1 to 2 years. They designed an integrated system: a single-launch space station dubbed Almaz (“diamond”) and a Transport Logistics Spacecraft (Russian acronym TKS) for reaching it (see section 3.3). Chelomei’s three-stage Proton booster would launch them both. Almaz was to be equipped with a crew capsule, radar remotesensing apparatus for imaging the Earth’s surface, cameras, two reentry capsules for returning data to Earth, and an antiaircraft cannon to defend against American attack. An interdepartmental commission approved the system in 1967. OKB-52 and its Branch No. 1 (ancestor of KB Salyut) divided responsibility for the system’s components. 2.1.3 First Space Stations (1970-1974)2.1.3 First Space Stations (1970-1974) Work on the Almaz stations proceeded apace, but the subsystems rapidly fell behind the original schedule. In February 1970, the Soviet Ministry of General Machine Building decided to transfer Almaz hardware and plans from Chelomei’s bureau to Korolev’s bureau. This was done in hopes it would permit the Soviet Union to launch a space station ahead of the U.S. Skylab project. The transfer was less physical than administrative, because both Energia Soyuz and Mashinostroyeniye Almaz hardware were assembled in the Krunichev plant. Using Soyuz hardware for subsystems and Almaz hardware for large components such as the hull, Korolev’s bureau and OKB-52 Branch No. 1 completed the world’s first space station, Long-Duration Station-1 (Russian acronym DOS-1), in just 12 months. DOS-1 was called Zarya (“dawn”) 1 until shortly before its launch, when it was realized that ||
| Figure 2-3. Salyut 1. Visible at the rear of the station (left) is the Soyuz-based propulsion module. A Salyut 1 Soyuz prepares to dock at the front of the station (right). Note the station’s Soyuz-type solar arrays. | Figure 2-3. Salyut 1. Visible at the rear of the station (left) is the Soyuz-based propulsion module. A Salyut 1 Soyuz prepares to dock at the front of the station (right). Note the station’s Soyuz-type solar arrays. | Figure 2-4. Partial cutaway of Proton configured for space station launch. The three-stage Proton rocket has launched all Soviet space stations and space station modules. Proton first flew as a two-stage vehicle in 1965. The threestage version used to launch stations debuted in 1969 and was declared operational in 1970. All three stages burn UDMH and N$_2$O$_4$ propellants. The three-stage Proton can place 20,000 kg in a circular 185 km orbit at 51.6° of inclination. |
| the name would cause confusion because Zarya was the code name for the TsUP. The station was hurriedly renamed Salyut (“salute”) 1 (figure 2-3). A three-stage Proton rocket boosted Salyut 1 into orbit (figure 2-4). The Soyuz 11 crew, which occupied Salyut 1 in June 1971, perished during return to Earth due to a Soyuz fault. Salyut 1 was followed by three more firstgeneration DOS-type stations, all based on Almaz components: one which failed to reach orbit in 1972 and received no official public designation (DOS-2), Cosmos 557 (DOS-3), which failed in orbit in 1973, and Salyut 4 (DOS-4) in 1974. The first-generation stations could not be refueled, and resupply was limited to what could be carried in the Soyuz orbital module. The firstgeneration stations each had only a single docking port. | 2.1.4 Almaz: Cancellation (1970-1980)2.1.4 Almaz: Cancellation (1970-1980) The Almaz program continued in modified (abbreviated) form. TKS work continued, though Soyuz spacecraft were used to ferry cosmonauts to the Almaz stations. Salyut 2, Salyut 3, and Salyut 5 were the Almaz 1, Almaz 2, and Almaz 3 stations. Salyut 2/Almaz 1 failed in orbit shortly after launch. NPO Mashinostroyeniye prepared Almaz 4 for launch in 1978, and proposed a 35-ton multiport Almaz station. Launching the Almaz multiport station would have required a new launch vehicle. However, the Almaz program was cancelled shortly before Almaz 4 (it would have been Salyut 7) was set to launch. The Almaz hardware was put in storage. Manned spaceflight activities became concentrated at NPO Energia in 1980. Energia worked with KB Salyut to produce additional Salyut stations. | Figure 2-4. Partial cutaway of Proton configured for space station launch. The three-stage Proton rocket has launched all Soviet space stations and space station modules. Proton first flew as a two-stage vehicle in 1965. The threestage version used to launch stations debuted in 1969 and was declared operational in 1970. All three stages burn UDMH and N$_2$O$_4$ propellants. The three-stage Proton can place 20,000 kg in a circular 185 km orbit at 51.6° of inclination. |
| Figure 2-5. Almaz radar satellite. | Figure 2-5. Almaz radar satellite. | but as early as October 1973, agreement was reached to resume the talks. In January 1975, Johnson Space Center Director Christopher Kraft outlined a possible future for U.S.-Soviet space cooperation, calling for a 1980 Shuttle docking with “whatever craft the U.S.S.R. intends to fly at that time.” He suggested that a joint space station program could begin in 1983, and that Soviet cosmonauts could fly as Shuttle passengers. In October 1976, Acting NASA Administrator Alan Lovelace met with Intercosmos Council chairman Boris Petrov and other Soviet officials to discuss a Shuttle docking with a Salyut space station (figure 2-6). NASA would not commit to any program ahead of the approaching U.S. Presidential elections. A formal agreement creating Shuttle-Salyut working groups was signed |
| 2.1.5 Almaz: Conversion (1980-1993)2.1.5 Almaz: Conversion (1980-1993) Mashinostroyeniye converted leftover Almaz hardware into unmanned satellites equipped with the ECOR-A Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) system for imaging the Earth’s surface. The first such satellite was lost in 1985, after its Proton booster failed. The second, Cosmos 1870, was an experimental prototype. It operated from July 1987 to July 1989. The latest satellite in the series was called Almaz 1, thereby producing confusion among persons aware of the Salyut 2/Almaz 1 space station. Almaz 1 (figure 2-5) returned images from March 1991 to October 1992. In September 1992, Valentin Etkin, the chief of the Department of Applied Space Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences Space Research Institute, described a further application of Almaz hardware. He called for a “Space Laboratory for the Study of Earth as an Ecological System” based on Almaz. The system would consist of three or four Almaz-derived satellites, each carrying 6.5 tons of scientific apparatus. According to a 1993 report, the Almaz 1V radar and optical Earth observation satellite is set for launch in June-July 1996, and the Almaz 2 satellite is being designed, with launch set for 1998. | 2.1.6 Shuttle-Salyut (1973-1978; 1980s)2.1.6 Shuttle-Salyut (1973-1978; 1980s) The Apollo Soyuz Test Project (ASTP) grew from and rapidly superseded joint U.S.-Soviet talks on compatibility of future spacecraft, | but as early as October 1973, agreement was reached to resume the talks. In January 1975, Johnson Space Center Director Christopher Kraft outlined a possible future for U.S.-Soviet space cooperation, calling for a 1980 Shuttle docking with “whatever craft the U.S.S.R. intends to fly at that time.” He suggested that a joint space station program could begin in 1983, and that Soviet cosmonauts could fly as Shuttle passengers. In October 1976, Acting NASA Administrator Alan Lovelace met with Intercosmos Council chairman Boris Petrov and other Soviet officials to discuss a Shuttle docking with a Salyut space station (figure 2-6). NASA would not commit to any program ahead of the approaching U.S. Presidential elections. A formal agreement creating Shuttle-Salyut working groups was signed |
| Figure 2-6. Conceptual drawing of Shuttle docked with Salyut. ||
| between Lovelace and Anatoly Alexandrov, President of the Soviet Academy of Science, on May 11, 1977. The agreement pointed out the complimentary nature of the two countries’ programs: Salyut was designed for long space stays, and Shuttle was designed for ferrying supplies and crews. The first Shuttle flight to a Soviet Salyut station was tentatively scheduled for 1981. The first Shuttle-Salyut working group meeting took place in Moscow in November 1977. However, the next meeting, set to take place in the U.S. in March-April 1978, was postponed. By late 1978, the U.S.-Soviet detente which made ASTP possible had run aground on human rights and technology transfer issues, and Shuttle-Salyut became dormant. However, occasionally during the 1980s, interest in Shuttle dockings with Soviet stations cropped up again. In 1985, the Reagan White House is said to have considered offering a Shuttle mission to aid in rescuing Salyut 7. In late 1987, NASA officials briefly considered having the Soviet shuttle dock with a | U.S. station, and the U.S. Shuttle dock with Mir. 2.1.7 Second-Generation Stations: Salyut 6 and Salyut 7 (1977-1986)2.1.7 Second-Generation Stations: Salyut 6 and Salyut 7 (1977-1986) The second-generation stations Salyut 6 and Salyut 7 each had two docking ports. This permitted guest crews (known officially as Visiting Expeditions) to visit resident crews (known officially as Principal Expeditions). Visiting Expeditions could trade their Soyuz for the one already docked to the station, leaving a fresh vehicle for the Principal Expedition. Visiting Expeditions included cosmonauts from countries allied with or sympathetic to the Soviet Union. They were selected, trained, and flown as part of the Intercosmos program. Progress resupply craft used the aft docking port to deliver supplies to the second-generation stations. | 2.1.8 Third-Generation Station: Mir (1986-present)2.1.8 Third-Generation Station: Mir (1986-present) With Mir, the third-generation station, the Soviet space station effort has come full circle. The Korolev bureau’s 1962 prospectus proposing a multimodular station reached fruition a quarter-century later, in 1987, with the permanent docking of the Kvant module to the Mir base block. In 1989-1990, the Kvant 2 and Kristall modules were added. At launch Mir was expected to be operational for 5 years. The base block is now in its ninth year. During that time it was almost always manned. 2.2 Salyut 1/DOS-1 (April 19-October 11, 1971)2.2 Salyut 1/DOS-1 (April 19-October 11, 1971) Salyut 1 (figure 2-3) was the first manned space staion. Most of its main components were originally built for OKB-52’s Almaz program. Many of the smaller components were borrowed from the Soyuz program. |

### 2.2.1 Salyut 1 Specifications2.2.1 Salyut 1 Specifications

                         Length ........................................................ 14.55 m
                         Maximum diameter ...................................... 4.15 m
                         Habitable volume ......................................... 90 m$^3$
                         Weight at launch ......................................... 18,900 kg
                         Launch vehicle ............................................ Proton (three-stage)
                         Span across solar arrays ............................. about 10 m
                         Area of solar arrays ..................................... 28 m$^2$
                         Number of solar arrays ................................ 4
                         Resupply carriers ....................................... Salyut 1-type Soyuz
                         Number of docking ports ............................. 1
                         Total manned missions ............................... 2
                         Total long-duration manned missions ........... 1 ​
| 2.2.2 Salyut 1 Notable Features2.2.2 Salyut 1 Notable Features Attitude control and orbit maintenance provided by a modified Soyuz service module (2.17 m long by 2.2 m dia). Station main propulsion system was a slightly modified Soyuz KDU-35 system. It had one single-nozzle 417-kg thrust primary engine and one two-nozzle 411-kg thrust backup, with four 10-kg engines for attitude control. The service module was attached at the aft end of the large-diameter section of the work compartment. It could not be entered by the cosmonauts. Two habitable compartments. In front, the transfer compartment (2 m dia by 3 m long), containing the drogue docking apparatus and an EVA hatch; aft, the work compartment, which was divided into small-diameter (2.9 m dia by 3.8 m long) and large-diameter (4.15 m dia by 4.1 m long) sections, linked by a 1.2-m-long frustum. | Main control panel (“astropost”) was a Soyuz control panel. Electricity provided by two pairs of Soyuz silicon photocell solar arrays. Electricity from the pair of solar arrays on a docked Soyuz (14 m2 total area) augmented the station’s power supply through plugs in the docking collars. Total solar array area for the Salyut 1/Soyuz 11 complex came to 42 m$^2$. Micrometeoroid detector panels built into the station’s hull. Served as a space station engineering test bed. Cosmonauts conducted tests of the Salyut ion attitude control sensor, gyrodynes, and atmosphere, as well as tests aimed at developing new automatic docking system and antenna designs. Central small-diameter compartment served a wardroom function, with provisions for the cosmonauts’ spare time. These included a cassette player and cassettes, a sketch pad, and a small library of books. It also held a table for dining and working. | Equipment compartments lining the inside of the hull covered by removable panels that formed the station’s interior walls. The walls each had different colors (light and dark gray, apple green, light yellow) to aid the cosmonauts in orienting themselves in weightlessness. Large-diameter work compartment equipped with a large conical structure housing astronomical instruments and other scientific and guidance equipment. Cosmonauts slept in sleeping bags attached to the walls of the largediameter compartment, or in the orbital module of the docked Soyuz. Sanitation/hygiene unit located in the large-diameter section of the work compartment, within an enclosure with a ventilation system and washable walls. Large-diameter compartment had two refrigerators for food storage. |

### 2.2.3 Salyut 1 Career2.2.3 Salyut 1 Career

Entries below describe Salyut 1 operations during Soyuz missions to the station. For information on the Soyuz missions, see section 1.7.
| Soyuz 10 | April 22-24, 1971 (launch to landing) |
| Vladimir Shatalov, Alexei Yeliseyev, Nikolai Rukavishnikov Crew code name—Granit Hard docked, but its crew could not enter Salyut 1. | Vladimir Shatalov, Alexei Yeliseyev, Nikolai Rukavishnikov Crew code name—Granit Hard docked, but its crew could not enter Salyut 1. |
| Soyuz 11 | June 7-29, 1971 (hard dock to undock) |
| Georgi Dobrovolski, Vladislav Volkov, Viktor Patsayev Crew code name—Yantar The Yantars performed astronomical observations using the Orion-1 telescope, grew plants in the Oazis hydroponics unit, and conducted extensive multispectral Earth resources photography. They appeared frequently on Soviet television. On June 27, the cosmonauts photographed the in-flight explosion of the third N-1 rocket. During reentry the crew died due to a Soyuz fault. | Georgi Dobrovolski, Vladislav Volkov, Viktor Patsayev Crew code name—Yantar The Yantars performed astronomical observations using the Orion-1 telescope, grew plants in the Oazis hydroponics unit, and conducted extensive multispectral Earth resources photography. They appeared frequently on Soviet television. On June 27, the cosmonauts photographed the in-flight explosion of the third N-1 rocket. During reentry the crew died due to a Soyuz fault. |
| 2.3 Failed Salyuts (1972-1973)2.3 Failed Salyuts (1972-1973) 2.3.1 DOS-2 (July 29, 1972)2.3.1 DOS-2 (July 29, 1972) A year after the Soyuz 11 failure, the Soviet Union felt ready to send crews to a second DOS-type station. Like Salyut 1, its large compontents were originally built for the Almaz program. Failure of the second stage of its three-stage Proton launch vehicle prevented the station from reaching orbit. It fell into the Pacific Ocean. | 2.3.2 Salyut 2/Almaz 1 (April 3-May 28, 1973)2.3.2 Salyut 2/Almaz 1 (April 3-May 28, 1973) On April 3, 1973, the day of the Salyut 2 launch, the Soviet magazine Nauka i Zhian published an interview with Soviet Academician Boris Petrov. In it he declared that lunar space stations would be established to act as bridgeheads for excursions to the lunar surface. He also predicted the advent of multimodular stations with crews of up to 120 people. The failure of Salyut 2 a few days later must have made these goals seem distant indeed. Salyut 2, the first Almaz station, reached orbit on April 3, 1973. Soon after, Salyut 2 lost stability and began tumbling. In 1992, Mikhail Lisun, backup cosmonaut for the Soyuz 24 flight to Almaz station | Salyut 5, attributed the loss of Salyut 2 to an electrical fire, followed by depressurization. Salyut 2 broke up on April 14, and all trackable pieces reentered by May 28, 1973. 2.3.3 Cosmos 557/DOS-3 (May 11-22, 1973)2.3.3 Cosmos 557/DOS-3 (May 11-22, 1973) The third DOS-type station reached orbit just ahead of the U.S. Skylab workshop. Like DOS-2 and Salyut 1, it was based on a hull transferred from the Almaz program in 1970. Shortly after attaining orbit, the station suffered a failure in its attitude control system ion sensors, leading to depletion of most of its attitude control fuel supply. One account states that a command to raise its orbit was sent, but the station was in the wrong attitude, so it reentered. |
| 2.4 Salyut 3/Almaz 2 (June 24, 1974-January 24, 1975)2.4 Salyut 3/Almaz 2 (June 24, 1974-January 24, 1975) Salyut 3 (figure 2-7) was the second Almaz station, and the first to be manned. Its mission was primarily military. For this reason, less information is available on Salyut 3 and Salyut 5 (the other successful Almaz station) than for the primarily civilian DOS-type Salyuts. Photos of the Almaz stations have surfaced only recently. | Figure 2-7. Salyut 3, the first successful Almaz space station. The drogue docking unit is at the rear of the station (left), between the two main engines. |
                         Length ........................................................ 15.8 m
                         Maximum diameter ...................................... 4.15 m
                         Habitable volume ......................................... 90 m$^3$
                         Weight at launch ......................................... 18,900 kg
                         Launch vehicle ............................................. Proton (three-stage)
                         Number of solar arrays ................................. 2
                         Resupply carriers ........................................ Soyuz Ferry
                         Number of docking ports ............................. 1
                         Total manned missions ............................... 2
                         Total long-duration manned missions ........... 1
                         Number of main engines ............................. 2
                         Main engine thrust (each) ........................... 400 kg
| 2.4.2 Salyut 3 Notable Features2.4.2 Salyut 3 Notable Features From aft to fore, consisted of an airlock chamber, a large-diameter work compartment, and a smalldiameter living compartment. Airlock chamber had four openings. The drogue unit of the pin and cone docking system filled the aft opening. The forward opening led into the large-diameter work compartment. On top of the airlock chamber was an EVA hatch (never used on an Almaz station). A hatch on the bottom led into the chamber from which a small Earth-return capsule could be ejected into space. Propulsion units were located on the aft end of the large-diameter compartment, on either side of the airlock chamber. These were specialized Almaz station engines, not the modified Soyuz units used with the early DOS Salyut stations. Unlike the early DOS Salyuts, Almaz had solar arrays which could track on the Sun in most station attitudes. The large-diameter portion of the station’s work compartment was dominated by the Agat | Earth-observation camera, which had a 10-m focal length. This was used primarily for military reconnaissance purposes. The cosmonauts are said to have observed targets set out on the ground at Baikonur. Secondary objectives included study of water pollution, agricultural land, possible ore-bearing landforms, and oceanic ice formation. Cosmonauts could develop film from the Agat camera on the station. Important or interesting images were printed, then scanned by a TV imaging system for broadcast to Earth. The cosmonauts needed as little as 30 minutes to shoot, develop, and scan a photograph. Other images were packed in the small Earth-return capsule, which was then ejected from thechamber under the spherical airlock. The capsule ejected by ground command. Ejection of the capsule signaled the end of an Almaz station’s usefulness. Small engines deorbited the capsule and were then discarded. The parachute of Salyut 3’s capsule opened at 8.4 km altitude. The small-diameter living compartment was separated from the work compartment by a bank of | 12 tanks for storing gas—presumably oxygen for breathing. Cosmonauts had one standing bunk and one foldaway bunk in the station’s living section. Salyut 3 was also equipped with a shower. Floor was covered with Velcro to aid the cosmonauts in moving about. Entertainment equipment included a magnetic chess set, a small library, and a tape player with cassettes. Exercise equipment included a treadmill and the Pingvin exercise suit. Tested the Priboy water regeneration system, which condensed water from the station’s atmosphere. |
Entries below describe Salyut 3 operations during Soyuz missions to the station. For more information on the Soyuz missions, see section 1.8.4.2. Dates are hard dock to undock; if no hard dock achieved, launch to landing.
| Soyuz 14 | July 4-19, 1974 |
| Pavel Popovich, Yuri Artyukhin Crew code name—Berkut The Berkuts tested the suitability of Salyut 3 as a manned military reconnaissance satellite. They also tested Almaz station systems, such as the solar arrays. The cosmonauts exercised for 2 hours each day to counter the effects of weightlessness. Because of this, they were able to climb from their Soyuz Ferry descent module without assistance at the end of their flight. | Pavel Popovich, Yuri Artyukhin Crew code name—Berkut The Berkuts tested the suitability of Salyut 3 as a manned military reconnaissance satellite. They also tested Almaz station systems, such as the solar arrays. The cosmonauts exercised for 2 hours each day to counter the effects of weightlessness. Because of this, they were able to climb from their Soyuz Ferry descent module without assistance at the end of their flight. |
| Soyuz 15 | August 26-28, 1974 |
| Gennadi Sarafanov, Lev Demin Crew code name—Dunay Failed to dock with Salyut 3. | Gennadi Sarafanov, Lev Demin Crew code name—Dunay Failed to dock with Salyut 3. |

## 2.5 Salyut 4/DOS-4 (December 26, 1974-February 2, 1977)2.5 Salyut 4/DOS-4 (December 26, 1974-February 2, 1977)
### 2.5.1 Salyut 4 Specifications2.5.1 Salyut 4 Specifications

                         Length ....................................................... 15.8 m
                         Maximum diameter ..................................... 4.15 m
                         Habitable volume ........................................ 90 m$^3$
                         Weight at launch ........................................ 18,900 kg
                         Launch vehicle ........................................... Proton (three-stage)
                         Orbital inclination ....................................... 51.6°
                         Area of solar arrays ................................... 60 m2
                         Number of solar arrays ............................... 3
                         Electricity production ................................. 4 kW
                         Resupply carriers ...................................... Soyuz Ferry
                         Number of docking ports ............................ 1
                         Total manned missions .............................. 3
                         Total unmanned missions .......................... 1
                         Total long-duration manned missions ........... 2 ​
| 2.5.2 Salyut 4 Notable Features2.5.2 Salyut 4 Notable Features Structural layout very similar to that of Salyut 1. That is, it had a single docking port leading into a transfer compartment, a work compartment divided into smalldiameter and large-diameter sections, and a propulsion and service module based on the Soyuz service module (figure 2-8). It was the last of four DOS-type stations based on hulls from the Almaz program. Stroka teleprinter allowed the TsUP to send hardcopy instructions to the Salyut 4 cosmonauts. Raketa (“rocket”) vacuum cleaner in transfer compartment. Rubberized fabric sleeve in the transfer compartment for providing ventilation to docked Soyuz Ferries. Cosmonauts spent a great deal of time conducting astrophysics observations. The large-diameter work compartment was dominated by a conical structure housing, among other things, the OST-1 25-cm solar telescope. It was equipped with a spectrograph and a diffraction spectrometer. The cosmonauts could recoat the mirror by remote control using the Zentis system. The solar telescope lacked a solar events alarm (as had Skylab) to alert the cosmonauts to valuable observation opportunities. The conical housing also held the Filin and RT-4 X-ray telescopes and the ITSK infrared telescope. Cosmonauts also spent a great deal of time on experiments with application to closed-cycle life support systems. They cultivated peas and onions in the Oazis plant growth unit. They again tested a water regeneration system, which condensed about a liter of water from the station’s air each day. | Figure 2-8. Salyut 4, the second DOS station to be manned. | Figure 2-8. Salyut 4, the second DOS station to be manned. |
| 2.5.2 Salyut 4 Notable Features2.5.2 Salyut 4 Notable Features Structural layout very similar to that of Salyut 1. That is, it had a single docking port leading into a transfer compartment, a work compartment divided into smalldiameter and large-diameter sections, and a propulsion and service module based on the Soyuz service module (figure 2-8). It was the last of four DOS-type stations based on hulls from the Almaz program. Stroka teleprinter allowed the TsUP to send hardcopy instructions to the Salyut 4 cosmonauts. Raketa (“rocket”) vacuum cleaner in transfer compartment. Rubberized fabric sleeve in the transfer compartment for providing ventilation to docked Soyuz Ferries. Cosmonauts spent a great deal of time conducting astrophysics observations. The large-diameter work compartment was dominated by a conical structure housing, among other things, the OST-1 25-cm solar telescope. It was equipped with a spectrograph and a diffraction spectrometer. The cosmonauts could recoat the mirror by remote control using the Zentis system. The solar telescope lacked a solar events alarm (as had Skylab) to alert the cosmonauts to valuable observation opportunities. The conical housing also held the Filin and RT-4 X-ray telescopes and the ITSK infrared telescope. Cosmonauts also spent a great deal of time on experiments with application to closed-cycle life support systems. They cultivated peas and onions in the Oazis plant growth unit. They again tested a water regeneration system, which condensed about a liter of water from the station’s air each day. | The Priboy water regeneration system was first tested on Salyut 3. Meteoroid measurement system with 4 m2 of detectors built into the hull. Solar arrays larger than the Soyuz-based arrays on Salyut 1/DOS-1. Salyut 4 had three steerable arrays with a combined surface area greater than the four nonsteerable arrays on Salyut 1. Exercise equipment included a treadmill (flown on previous stations) and a bicycle ergometer (flown for the first time on Salyut 4). The bicycle ergometer generated electricity which was stored for use by the station. Used Delta orientation/navigation system; also tested the Kaskad orientation/navigation system. For observing Earth, carried the KATE-140 and KATE-500 multispectral cameras, Spektru upper atmosphere analyzer, and other instruments. | |
Entries below describe Salyut 4 operations during Soyuz missions to the station. For more information on the Soyuz missions, see sections 1.8.4.3 and 1.10.4.1 Dates are hard dock to undock; if no hard dock achieved, launch to landing.
| Soyuz 17 | January 12-February 9, 1975 |
| Alexei Gubarev, Georgi Grechko Crew code name—Zenit When Soyuz 17 docked, Salyut 4 was in an unusually high circular orbit at 350 km. Astrophysics was a major component of their mission (hence the high altitude). The Zenits discovered that the main mirror of the solar telescope had been ruined by direct exposure to sunlight when the pointing system failed. They resurfaced the mirror and worked out a way of pointing the telescope using a stethoscope, stopwatch, and the noises the moving mirror made in its casing. | Alexei Gubarev, Georgi Grechko Crew code name—Zenit When Soyuz 17 docked, Salyut 4 was in an unusually high circular orbit at 350 km. Astrophysics was a major component of their mission (hence the high altitude). The Zenits discovered that the main mirror of the solar telescope had been ruined by direct exposure to sunlight when the pointing system failed. They resurfaced the mirror and worked out a way of pointing the telescope using a stethoscope, stopwatch, and the noises the moving mirror made in its casing. |
| “The April 5 Anomaly” | April 5, 1975 |
| Vasili Lazerev, Oleg Makarov Crew code name—Ural Failed to dock with Salyut 4 due to a catastrophic Soyuz booster failure during ascent to orbit. | Vasili Lazerev, Oleg Makarov Crew code name—Ural Failed to dock with Salyut 4 due to a catastrophic Soyuz booster failure during ascent to orbit. |
| Soyuz 18 | May 26-July 26, 1975 |
| Pyotr Klimuk, Vitali Sevastyanov Crew code name—Kavkaz The Kavkaz crew carried out 90 scientific and engineering experiments, continuing the work of the Soyuz 17 crew. During their stay, they conducted two communications sessions with the ASTP Soyuz (Soyuz 19) crew. | Pyotr Klimuk, Vitali Sevastyanov Crew code name—Kavkaz The Kavkaz crew carried out 90 scientific and engineering experiments, continuing the work of the Soyuz 17 crew. During their stay, they conducted two communications sessions with the ASTP Soyuz (Soyuz 19) crew. |
| Soyuz 20 | November 17, 1975-February 16, 1976 |
| First spacecraft to dock unmanned with a Salyut station. Carried life sciences experiments, qualified Soyuz for long-duration flights attached to a station, and served as proof-of-concept mission for Progress development. | First spacecraft to dock unmanned with a Salyut station. Carried life sciences experiments, qualified Soyuz for long-duration flights attached to a station, and served as proof-of-concept mission for Progress development. |
Salyut 5 was the third Almaz station. Like Salyut 3/Almaz 2 (figure 2-7), which it closely resembled, its aims were primarily military.

### 2.6.1 Salyut 5 Specifications2.6.1 Salyut 5 Specifications

                         Length .................................................... 14.55 m
                         Maximum diameter .................................. 4.15 m
                         Habitable volume ..................................... 100 m$^3$
                         Weight at launch ..................................... 19,000 kg
                         Launch vehicle ......................................... Proton (three-stage)
                         Orbital inclination ..................................... 51.6°
                         Number of solar arrays ............................. 2
                         Resupply carriers ..................................... Soyuz Ferry
                         Number of docking ports .......................... 1
                         Total manned missions ............................ 3
                         Total long-duration missions ..................... 2
| 2.6.2. Salyut 5 Notable Features2.6.2. Salyut 5 Notable Features Consisted of a spherical transfer module with four hatches, a largediameter work compartment and a small-diameter living compartment. | As with Salyut 3, the large Agat Earth-observation camera dominated the floor of the largediameter work compartment. Agat images were used to compile maps; analyze tectonic structures; seek out oil, gas, and ore deposits; survey the sites of | planned hydroelectric facilities; study formation of storms; and spot forest fires. These activities were in addition to the station’s primary Earth-observation objectives, which were military. |

### 2.6.3 Salyut 5 Career2.6.3 Salyut 5 Career

Entries below describe Salyut 5 operations during Soyuz missions to the station. For more information on the Soyuz missions, see section 1.8.4.4 Dates are hard dock to undock; if no hard dock achieved, launch to landing.
| Soyuz 21 | July 7-August 24, 1976 |
| Boris Volynov, Vitali Zholobov Crew code name—Baykal The Salyut 5 crew’s stay coincided with the start of the Siber military exercise in Siberia. The cosmonauts observed the exercise as part of an assessment of the station’s military surveillance capabilities. They conducted only a few scientific experiments–these included first use of the Kristall furnace for crystal growth. Engineering experiments included propellant transfer system tests with implications for future Progress freighter operations. The Soyuz 21 crew seems to have left the station suddenly, ahead of their scheduled departure date. This has been attributed to a fire, an environmental control system ​failure, and to health problems caused by fumes from chemicals used to develop film from the station’s surveillance cameras. | Boris Volynov, Vitali Zholobov Crew code name—Baykal The Salyut 5 crew’s stay coincided with the start of the Siber military exercise in Siberia. The cosmonauts observed the exercise as part of an assessment of the station’s military surveillance capabilities. They conducted only a few scientific experiments–these included first use of the Kristall furnace for crystal growth. Engineering experiments included propellant transfer system tests with implications for future Progress freighter operations. The Soyuz 21 crew seems to have left the station suddenly, ahead of their scheduled departure date. This has been attributed to a fire, an environmental control system ​failure, and to health problems caused by fumes from chemicals used to develop film from the station’s surveillance cameras. |
| Soyuz 23 | October 14-16, 1976 |
| Vyacheslav Zudov, Valeri Rozhdestvenski Crew code name—Radon Failed to dock with Salyut 5. | Vyacheslav Zudov, Valeri Rozhdestvenski Crew code name—Radon Failed to dock with Salyut 5. |
| Soyuz 24 | February 8-25, 1977 |
| Viktor Gorbatko, Yuri Glazkov Crew code name—Terek The cosmonauts entered the station wearing breathing masks, apparently because of the problems encountered on Soyuz 21, but the air proved safe to breathe. The main purpose of their mission seems to have been to tie up loose ends generated by the precipitous departure of the Soyuz 21 crew. They loaded the Salyut 5 Earth-return capsule with samples and film. It detached the day after their departure from the station, on February 26, and was recovered. The Soyuz 24 crew conducted Earth observation and materials sciences experiments. They also conducted an air replacement engineering experiment with implications for future Progress freighter operations. Air was released from the forward end of the station while simultaneously being replaced from storage tanks in the Soyuz 24 orbital module. | Viktor Gorbatko, Yuri Glazkov Crew code name—Terek The cosmonauts entered the station wearing breathing masks, apparently because of the problems encountered on Soyuz 21, but the air proved safe to breathe. The main purpose of their mission seems to have been to tie up loose ends generated by the precipitous departure of the Soyuz 21 crew. They loaded the Salyut 5 Earth-return capsule with samples and film. It detached the day after their departure from the station, on February 26, and was recovered. The Soyuz 24 crew conducted Earth observation and materials sciences experiments. They also conducted an air replacement engineering experiment with implications for future Progress freighter operations. Air was released from the forward end of the station while simultaneously being replaced from storage tanks in the Soyuz 24 orbital module. |
| 2.7 Salyut 6/DOS-5 (September 29, 1977-July 29, 1982)2.7 Salyut 6/DOS-5 (September 29, 1977-July 29, 1982) Salyut 6 (figure 2-9) was the first second-generation DOS-type Salyut space station. | Figure 2-9. Salyut 6, the third DOS station to be manned. Addition of the aft port (left) forced redesign of the main propulsion system. |
                         Length .................................................... 15.8 m
                         Maximum diameter .................................. 4.15 m
                         Habitable volume ..................................... 90 m$^3$
                         Weight at launch ..................................... 19,824 kg
                         Launch vehicle ......................................... Proton (three-stage)
                         Orbital inclination ..................................... 51.6°
                         Span across solar arrays .......................... 17 m
                         Area of solar arrays .................................. 51 m$^2$
                         Number of solar arrays ............................. 3
                         Electricity available .................................. 4-5 kW
                         Resupply carriers .................................... Soyuz Ferry, Soyuz-T,
                         Progress, TKS
                         Number of docking ports .......................... 2
                         Total manned missions ........................... 18
                         Total unmanned missions ........................ 13
                         Total long-duration missions ..................... 6
                         Number of main engines .......................... 2
                         Main engine thrust (each) ........................ 300 kg
| 2.7.2 Salyut 6 Notable Features2.7.2 Salyut 6 Notable Features Most notable single feature was aft docking port that permitted dockings by Visiting Expeditions and resupply by Progress freighters. Aft port equipped with the Igla approach system. Docking collar contained ports for transfer of propellants and pressurant from a docked Progress to Salyut 6’s tanks. The aft port was connected to the large-diameter work compartment through a small intermediate compartment. Large-diameter compartment longer than the one on the firstgeneration Salyut 1 and Salyut 4 stations (6 m vs 4.1 m). Omission of the Soyuz-based propulsion module used on the first-generation stations meant total station length did not change. As with the earlier Salyuts, Salyut 6’s large-diameter work compartment was dominated by a conical housing for scientific equipment. For Salyut 6 it contained astronomical equipment, including the BST-1M multispectral telescope | and the Yelena gamma-ray telescope. Had three sets of large solar arrays–one set on either side of the hull, and one on top. The arrays were equipped with motors and sun-sensors for automatic Sun tracking. Communications antennas were located on the ends of the solar arrays. Radio signals from the antennas and electricity generated by the arrays passed through “rotating connections” at the bases of the arrays to enter Salyut 6. Salyut 4 also had steerable arrays, though their functional details may have differed from those on Salyut 6. There was no fourth array opposite the array on top because it would have interfered with the instruments projecting from the conical scientific instrument compartment, which opened to space on that side (the bottom) of the station. Guidance and control systems concentrated in the Orientation and Motion Control System of the Station (Russian acronym SOUD). It included gyroscopes, ion sensors, solar sensors, star | sensors, a sextant, manual controls, the Kaskad orientation system, and “the radio rendezvous equipment which jointly with the radio equipment of the transport ship provides for measuring the relative parameters of motion.” Rendezvous and docking was the SOUD’s most complicated operating mode. The system had several layers of redundancy. Attitude control and main propulsion systems were brought together in Salyut 6 to form the Integrated Propulsion System (Russian acronym ODU). Both attitude control and main propulsion engines drew on the same supply of N2O4 and UDMH propellants. The two main engines each had 300 kg of thrust. The 32 attitude control engines each had 14 kg of thrust. To permit changeout and addition of scientific gear, extra electrical outlets for new scientific equipment were provided within Salyut 6’s pressurized compartments. |
* Figure 2-10. Key to icons. Salyut 6 and Salyut 7 each had two docking ports; the Mir base block has two docking ports and four berthing ports. Multiple docking ports mean continual configuration changes as spacecraft come and go and modules are added. The icons shown here are combined in sections 2.7.3, 2.8.3, and 2.9.3 to depict the changing configurations of the three multimodular stations throughout their careers (1977-1994). The icons and icon combinations are strictly representative, and do not depict the true orientation of solar arrays or true relative sizes.

### 2.7.3 Salyut 6 Career2.7.3 Salyut 6 Career

Changes in the configuration of the Salyut 6 station included dockings by Soyuz Ferry, Soyuz-T, Progress, and the Cosmos 1267 FGB, as well as Soyuz transfers from port to port. The icons on the following pages depict these changes. Aligned horizontally with each icon are names (arranged to match icon positions) of spacecraft and station modules depicted and the inclusive dates of the configuration. Port transfers are shown by flipping the Salyut icon and leaving the Soyuz icon in place because it was Salyut 6 that rotated during port transfers. The text blocks below the icons cover important hardware-related events, such as anomalies and EVAs. Refer to figure 2-10 for key to icons. For more information on Soyuz Ferry, Soyuz-T, and Progress vehicles mentioned, see sections 1.8.4.5, 1.12.3.2 , and 1.10.4.2 . For Cosmos 1267 FGB information, see section 3.3.4.
| Salyut 6 | September 29-October 10, 1977 |
| | Soyuz 25 • Salyut 6 | October 10, 1977 |
| Unsuccessful Soyuz 25 docking. Soyuz 25 achieved soft dock with the new Salyut 6 station, inserting its probe apparatus into the conical drogue of the Salyut 6 front port. Hard docking involved retracting the probe to pull the station and spacecraft docking collars together. However, the docking collars would not latch. Cosmonauts Vladimir Kovalyonok and Valeri Ryumin had to ​return to Earth before their ferry’s batteries became depleted. Engineers theorized that the Salyut 6 forward port might have been damaged during ascent, or that the Soyuz 25 docking unit was at fault. If the latter was true (and they could not be certain, because the docking unit was discarded before reentry, along with the Soyuz 25 orbital module), then it was possible that the several hard docking attempts had damaged the Salyut 6 forward port, making it unfit for future dockings. ||
| Salyut 6 | October 10-December 11, 1977 |

#### 2.7.3.1 Salyut 6 Principal Expedition 12.7.3.1 Salyut 6 Principal Expedition 1

Yuri Romanenko, Georgi Grechko Crew code name—Tamyr Launched in Soyuz 26, December 10, 1977 Landed in Soyuz 27, March 16, 1978 96 days in space
| | Salyut 6 • Soyuz 26 | December 11, 1977-January 11, 1978 |
| Soyuz 26 docks at aft port, EVA inspection of front port. The Tamyrs docked with the station’s aft port because of the Soyuz 25 failure. On December 20 they conducted the first EVA from a Salyut space station. They depressurized the forward transfer compartment and opened the forward docking port. Grechko and Romanenko inspected the forward docking port drogue and docking collar. They beamed color TV images of the unit to the TsUP in Moscow. Grechko reported, “All of the docking equipment—lamps, electric sockets, latches—all is in fine order.” The spacewalk lasted about 20 min, and depressurization lasted about 90 min. They repressurized the transfer compartment from storage tanks—a procedure first tested by the Soyuz 24 crew on Salyut 5 in February 1977. Their inspection confirmed that the Soyuz 25 spacecraft docking unit was at fault in its failure to hard dock, and that its docking attempts had left the Salyut 6 front port undamaged. During this period, the Tamyrs extensively tested the Salyut 6’s Delta automatic navigational system. On December 29 the Soyuz 26 main engine raised Salyut 6’s orbit. Because Soyuz 26 was at the aft port, Salyut 6’s own engines could not be used to raise its orbit. ||
| | Soyuz 27 • Salyut 6 • Soyuz 26 | January 11-16, 1978 |
| Soyuz 27 arrives at Salyut 6. The Soviets hurried to take advantage of the undamaged Salyut 6 forward port. Soyuz 27 docked without incident at the front port carrying cosmonauts Oleg Makarov and Vladimir Dzhanibekov, who formed the first Visiting Expedition crew in the Soviet space station program (or, for that matter, in any space station program). For the docking, the Tamyrs withdrew to their Soyuz 26 spacecraft and sealed the hatch into Salyut 6 behind them. This was done in the event of a depressurization emergency associated with the docking of Soyuz 27. There was also some concern that ​ stresses and vibrations produced when the 7-ton Soyuz 27 spacecraft contacted the front port might transmit through Salyut 6, forcibly uncoupling Soyuz 26 from the rear port. Rezonans and first spacecraft swap. The Soyuz 27-Salyut 6-Soyuz 26 combination massed about 33,000 kg and featured seven compartments: two descent modules, two orbital modules, the transfer compartment, the work compartment, and the small aft intermediate compartment. The four cosmonauts conducted many experiments, including Rezonans, which was designed to determine if resonant frequencies might threaten the structural integrity of the three-spacecraft combination. The experiment called for the cosmonauts to jump around Salyut 6 on command from the TsUP. The guest crew spent 5 days on Salyut 6, then returned to Earth in Soyuz 26, leaving the fresh Soyuz 27 spacecraft for the Tamyrs. This was the first of many such spacecraft swaps. ||
| Soyuz 27 • Salyut 6 | January 16-22, 1978 |
| | Soyuz 27 • Salyut 6 • Progress 1 | January 22-February 6, 1978 |
| Progress 1 refuels Salyut 6. The first Progress delivered what would become the standard manifest of food, air, water, and fuel. According to Sergei Krikalev, in Progress’ early days the cosmonauts rushed to unload delivered supplies and reload the Progress with waste. By the time he flew for the first time (to Mir, in 1988), this procedure had been modified to let Progress serve as a kind of storage room while docked. The Progress was retained for as long as possible (until the next Progress was needed and ready for launch), and cargo was removed gradually, as needed. For this purpose, cargo was loaded so that it could be taken out in order of anticipated need. Center-of-gravity and volume limitations sometimes compromised this, however. For this first Progress refueling operation, the Tamyrs fastidiously inspected Salyut 6’s fuel lines for leaks for several days. Fuel and oxidizer were transferred February 2-3. On February 5 nitrogen from Progress 1 purged the lines so they would not spill toxic propellant onto the docking drogue when the supply ship undocked. ||
| Soyuz 27 • Salyut 6 | February 6-March 3, 1978 |
| | Soyuz 27 • Salyut 6 • Soyuz 28 | March 3-10, 1978 |
| First Intercosmos mission. Alexei Gubarev and Vladimir Remek formed the Zenit Visiting Expedition. Vladimir Remek, a Czech, was the first non-U.S./non-Soviet space traveler. He flew as part of Intercosmos, a program of cooperative space activities between the Soviet Union and other countries (especially those in the eastern bloc). Remek’s experiment program touched on life sciences, materials processing, and upper atmosphere research. ||
| Soyuz 27 • Salyut 6 | March 10-16, 1978 |
| Salyut 6 | March 16-June 16, 1978 |

#### 2.7.3.2 Salyut 6 Principal Expedition 22.7.3.2 Salyut 6 Principal Expedition 2

Vladimir Kovalyonok, Alexandr Ivanchenkov Crew code name—Foton Launched in Soyuz 29, June 15, 1978 Landed in Soyuz 31, November 2, 1978 140 days in space
| | Soyuz 29 • Salyut 6 | June 16-29, 1978 |
| The Fotons start work aboard Salyut 6. Upon arriving at Salyut 6, Kovalyonok and Ivanchenkov switched on the station’s air regenerators and thermal regulation system, and activated the water recycling system to reprocess water left aboard by the Tamyrs. De-mothballing Salyut 6 occurred simultaneously with the crew’s adaptation to weightlessness, and required about one week. On June 19 Salyut 6 was in a 368 km by 338 km orbit. Onboard temperature was 20°C, and air pressure was 750 mm/Hg. Soon after this, Kovalyonok and Ivanchenkov performed maintenance on the station’s airlock, installed equipment they brought with them in Soyuz 29’s orbital module, and tested the station’s Kaskad orientation system. The station operated in gravity-gradient stabilized mode June 24-26 to avoid attitude control system engine firings which could cause interference with a 3-day smelting experiment using the Splav-01 furnace. The previous crew installed the furnace in the intermediate compartment so it could operate in vacuum. ||
| | Soyuz 29 • Salyut 6 • Soyuz 30 | June 16-29, 1978 |
| Poland in space. Miroslaw Hermaszewski, the second Intercosmos cosmonaut, flew to Salyut 6 with Pyotr Klimuk. His experiment program stressed life sciences, Earth observations, and study of the aurora borealis. ||
| Soyuz 29 • Salyut 6 | July 5-9, 1978 |
| | Soyuz 29 • Salyut 6 • Progress 2 | July 9-August 2, 1978 ​ |
| EVA and Progress 2. Progress 2 delivered, among other items, the Kristall kiln. Fuel transfer was carried out under TsUP control, leaving the cosmonauts free to do other things. On July 29, the Fotons conducted an EVA to retrieve detectors and materials samples launched attached to the Salyut 6 hull. The EVA lasted 2 hr, 5 min. Afterwards, the Fotons replenished the Salyut 6 air supply, which had been depleted by the EVA, from tanks in Progress 2. They then filled Progress 2 with trash. It separated and deorbited on command from the TsUP. ||
| Soyuz 29 • Salyut 6 | August 2-10, 1978 |
| Soyuz 29 • Salyut 6 • Progress 3 | August 10-21, 1978 |
| Soyuz 29 • Salyut 6 | August 21-27, 1978 |
| | Soyuz 29 • Salyut 6 • Soyuz 31 | August 27-September 3, 1978 |
| East Germany in space. Valeri Bykovski and Sigmund Jähn of East Germany formed the Yastreb crew. Jähn’s program focused on materials sciences, Earth observations, and life sciences. ||
| Salyut 6 • Soyuz 31 | September 3-7, 1978 |
| | Salyut 6 • Soyuz 31 | September 7-October 6, 1978 |
| Transfer from aft port to front port. The Fotons conducted the first transfer of a Soyuz from the aft port to the front port of a space station. This became a routine procedure. They undocked Soyuz 31 and backed off to 100-200 m distance. Then the TsUP commanded Salyut 6 to rotate laterally 180°, placing the front port before the waiting Soyuz 31 spacecraft. The operation freed the aft port for additional Progress freighters. ||
| Progress 4 • Salyut 6 • Soyuz 31 | October 6-24, 1978 |
| Salyut 6 • Soyuz 31 | October 24-November 2, 1978 |
| | Salyut 6 | November 2, 1978-February 26, 1979 |
| Salyut 6 propulsion system malfunction. Late in Salyut 6 Principal Expedition 2, the Fotons noted deviations in the control parameters of the fuel lines in the Salyut 6 propulsion system. During this period, analysis of readings from six sensors indicated a leak in one of three tanks in the Salyut 6 ODU. UDMH fuel had leaked into the nitrogen-pressurized bellows which pushed fuel from the tank to Salyut 6’s rocket motors. It threatened to damage nonmetallic parts of a valve which lead into the “supercharging line,” and to contaminate the entire propulsion system, including the attitude control system. ||

#### 2.7.3.3 Salyut 6 Principal Expedition 32.7.3.3 Salyut 6 Principal Expedition 3

Vladimir Lyakhov, Valeri Ryumin Crew code name—Proton Launched in Soyuz 32, February 25, 1979 Landed in Soyuz 34, August 19, 1979 175 days in space
| Salyut 6 • Soyuz 32 | February 26-March 14, 1979 |
| | Progress 5 • Salyut 6 • Soyuz 32 | March 14-April 3, 1979 |
| Propulsion system repair. Repair procedures began on March 15. Fuel in the undamaged tanks was combined in one tank. The station was spun end over end so centrifugal force would separate UDMH fuel from the nitrogen pressurant leaked from behind the ruptured bellows in the damaged fuel tank. The fuel in the damaged tank was then pumped into the emptied good tank and into two tanks in Progress 5. The damaged tank was then sealed off and opened to space for 7 days. On March 23 the tank was closed and filled with nitrogen pressurant, then vented again. This procedure was repeated several times in order to purge the tank of residual fuel traces. In addition, the “supercharging line” was purged. On March 27 the damaged tank was purged once more, filled with nitrogen, then sealed off from the rest of the fuel system, leaving Salyut 6 with two functioning fuel tanks. The opening and closing of valves was carried out by the crew under supervision of the TsUP. According to Ryumin, the operation “restored the entire system,” and “the success of this operation enabled the station to fly several years beyond the end of the program.” ||
| | Salyut 6 • Soyuz 32 | April 3-May 15, 1979 |
| Soyuz 33 malfunction. The Protons were to receive the Saturns, Nikolai Rukavishnikov and Bulgarian Intercosmos cosmonaut Georgi Ivanov, on April 11. But Soyuz 33’s main engine failed, forcing its return to Earth without docking with Salyut 6. This cast doubt on Soyuz 32’s engine and the engines of other Soyuz Ferries. This in turn cast doubt on the Photons’ ability to ​complete their mission—Soyuz 32 was nearing the end of its rated 90-day space endurance and needed to be replaced with a fresh craft. The Saturns returned safely to Earth on April 12 after a ballistic reentry. ||
| Progress 6 Salyut 6 Soyuz 32 | May 15-June 8, 1979 |
| | Soyuz 34 • Salyut 6 • Soyuz 32 | June 8-13, 1979 |
| Soyuz 34 replaces Soyuz 32. Progress 6 circularized Salyut 6’s orbit on May 29 in preparation for the arrival of Soyuz 34. Soyuz 34 was launched unmanned to replace Soyuz 32, which had exceeded its 90-day stay limit on May 27. Arrival of Progress 34 helped ensure that Ryumin and Lyakhov would be able to complete their mission. Soyuz 34 also tested improvements to the Soyuz main engine meant to prevent recurrence of the Soyuz 33 failure. The spacecraft delivered 200 kg of cargo. Soyuz 32 returned to Earth unmanned with a cargo of experiment results and malfunctioning Salyut 6 equipment. The equipment was of interest to space station engineers. ||
| Soyuz 34 • Salyut 6 | June 13-14, 1979 |
| | Soyuz 34 • Salyut 6 | June 14-30, 1979 |
| Port Transfer. The Soviets transferred Soyuz 34 from the aft port to the front port by rotating Salyut 6. This freed the aft port for Progress 7. ||
| | Soyuz 34 • Salyut 6 • Progress 7 | June 30-July 18, 1979 |
| KRT-10 assembly and deployment. Progress 7 delivered the 350-kg KRT-10 radio telescope. It comprised a total of seven pieces of equipment: antenna reflector, “focal container and supports,” “mechanism for securing the antenna to the station,” control console, “time block,” and a package containing lowfrequency radiometers. The Protons assembled the antenna and its support equipment in the station and Progress 7’s dry cargo compartment over a 2-week period. Ryumin and Lyakhov had not seen the complete system before because the KRT-10 was still being tested and manufactured at the time they were trained to assemble it. Control panels were attached to the conical housing in the large-diameter compartment and data recorders to the station’s “ceiling.” A “cable entrance mechanism” was assembled in the intermediate compartment, behind the device for securing the antenna to the station, which filled the aft port. The diameter of the folded antenna was only 0.5 m. As Progress 7 backed away from the station, Ryumin commanded the antenna to unfold from the aft port. A TV camera on Progress 7 transmitted a blurry image of Salyut 6’s aft port to the TsUP and the TV aboard Salyut 6 as the KRT-10 opened to its full 10-m diameter. ​ Soyuz 34 • Salyut 6 July 18-August 19, 1979 Emergency EVA to remove KRT-10. On August 9 the KRT-10 antenna failed to separate from Salyut 6. Examination through the aft-facing ports indicated that the antenna was snared on the aft docking target. This prevented further Progress dockings and interfered with the engines. The Protons attempted to free the antenna by rocking the station. After considering abandoning Salyut 6 —according to Ryumin, its primary mission was complete—crew and TsUP agreed to attempt an EVA to remove the antenna. Ryumin and Lyakhov performed the 83-min EVA on August 15. With difficulty Ryumin deployed a folded handrail, then clambered over the hull to the rear of the station. He found that the KRT-10’s ribs had torn the station’s insulation. As Ryumin cut cables the KRT-10 oscillated back and forth, threatening to strike him. Ryumin carried a 1.5-m barbed pole to push the antenna away after he finished cutting it away from Salyut 6. Once the antenna was discarded, the Protons inspected the exterior of Salyut 6. They found that portions of its insulation had broken off or become discolored. They also retrieved samples of materials that had been exposed to space conditions on Salyut 6’s hull, and a portion of the micrometeoroid detector. Salyut 6 August 19-December 19, 1979 Soyuz-T 1 • Salyut 6 December 19, 1979-March 23, 1980 Soyuz-T 1. This improved version of Soyuz was test-flown unmanned to Salyut 6. It remained docked to the unmanned station, powered down, for 95 days, then returned to Earth. Salyut 6 March 23-29, 1980 Salyut 6 • Progress 8 March 29-April 10, 1980 ​====2.7.3.4 Salyut 6 Principal Expedition 4==== Leonid Popov, Valeri Ryumin Crew code name—Dneiper Launched in Soyuz 35, April 9, 1980 Landed in Soyuz 37, October 11, 1980 185 days in space Soyuz 35 • Salyut 6 • Progress 8 April 10-25, 1980 Ryumin again in orbit. Valentin Lebedev was scheduled to be Leonid Popov’s flight engineer, but he required an operation after injuring his knee while working out on a trampoline. Ryumin, of the last crew to visit Salyut 6, was called in to fill his place. Upon entering Salyut 6, Ryumin noted that the two viewports in the transfer compartment had lost their transparency. The windows also had many chips in them caused by micrometeoroids and orbital debris. The cosmonauts replaced components of the attitude control system and life support system, installed a new caution and warning system, synchronized the station’s clocks with those in the TsUP, added an 80-kg storage battery, and replaced air from tanks in Progress 8. Soyuz 35 • Salyut 6 April 25-29, 1980 Soyuz 35 • Salyut 6 • Progress 9 April 29-May 20, 1980 Progress 9 pumps water. Before Progress 9, Salyut 6 crewmen had to transfer water into the station in 5-kg containers. Progress 9 featured the Rodnik system, by which crewmen ran a pipe to the station’s tanks. The cargo ship transferred 180 kg of water in this manner. Soyuz 35 • Salyut 6 May 20-27, 1980 Soyuz 35 • Salyut 6 • Soyuz 36 April 29-May 20, 1980 Hungary in space. Valeri Kubasov and Bertalan Farkas formed the Orion Visiting Expedition crew. Hungary’s experiments were in the areas of materials processing, Earth observation, and life sciences. Salyut 6 • Soyuz 36 June 3-4, 1980 ​ Salyut 6 • Soyuz 36 June 4-6, 1980 Port Transfer. Soyuz 36 was repositioned by rotating Salyut 6, freeing the aft port for Soyuz-T 2. Soyuz-T 2 • Salyut 6 • Soyuz 36 June 6-9, 19 Soyuz-T 2. This was a manned test flight of the successor to the Soyuz Ferry, the Soyuz-T. Cosmonauts Yuri Malyshev and Vladimir Aksyonov spent only 2 days on Salyut 6 with the Dneiper resident crew. Salyut 6 • Soyuz 36 June 9-July 1, 1980 Running track breaks. Popov and Ryumin relied heavily on the running track and bicycle ergometer to maintain their fitness so they could return safely to Earth after their prolonged stay in weightlessness. On June 15 their running track broke, but the cosmonauts avoided repairing it for several days, because “it meant unscrewing a lot of bolts and would take a lot of time to repair.” However, doctors on the ground ordered them to increase their level of exercise, so they had to repair the track., Also at about this time, the cosmonauts repaired the Kaskad attitude control system, in the process expending a large amount of fuel. Progress 10 • Salyut 6 • Soyuz 36 July 1-17, 1980 Salyut 6 • Soyuz 36 July 17-24, 1980 Soyuz 37 • Salyut 6 • Soyuz 36 July 24-31, 1980 Vietnam in space. Viktor Gorbatko and Pham Tuan of Vietnam arrived aboard Salyut 6 in Soyuz 37, and returned to Earth in Soyuz 36. Tuan’s 30 experiments involved observing Vietnam from space, life sciences (including tests of growth of Vietnamese azolla water ferns, with application to future closed-loop life support systems), and materials processing. Soyuz 37 • Salyut 6 July 31-August 1, 1980 Soyuz 37 • Salyut 6 August 1-September 19, 1980 Port Transfer. Soyuz 37 was repositioned by rotating Salyut 6, freeing the aft port for Soyuz 38. ​Microgravity at night. Ryumin noted in his diary on August 16 that every night before going to sleep the crew activated the Kristall or Splav-01 materials processing furnaces. This was done to reduce the level of disturbance caused by crew movements around the station, improving its microgravity conditions for materials processing. Ryumin also commented that Splav and Kristall could not be used at the same time, because they each placed a heavy load on the Salyut 6 power supply. Previous expeditions had operated the furnaces for a maximum of 10-12 hr at a time, but for Salyut 6 Principal Expedition 4, longer melts, of 120 hr and 60 hr, were carried out. The products of these melts were large crystals.62 Fuel conservation and problems with showers. On September 10 Ryumin wrote in his diary that the experiments requiring that Salyut 6 be maneuvered at a cost in fuel were complete, so the station was in a gravity-gradient stabilization mode at least until the next Progress arrived. In this mode it pointed the aft end of the Soyuz 37 spacecraft toward the Earth. This made Earth observations convenient, as most of the windows not blocked by equipment were located in the transfer compartment and pointed toward Earth. Ryumin also noted that he and Lyakhov had decided to postpone their monthly shower. “When you begin to think of all the preparatory operations you have to do, and then how many post-shower operations you have to perform, the desire to take a shower diminishes. You have to heat the water, in batches, no less. You have to get the shower chamber, set up the water collectors, attach the vacuum cleaner . . . it takes nearly the entire day just for that shower,” he complained. Soyuz 37 • Salyut 6 • Soyuz 38 September 19-26, 1980 Cuban in Space. The Soyuz 38 docking occurred in darkness. As the spacecraft approached Salyut 6, the Dneipers could see only its “headlights.” Ryumin filmed ignition and operation of the transport’s main engine., Arnaldo Tamayo-Mendez of Cuba and Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Romanenko docked without incident. Soyuz 37 • Salyut 6 September 26-30, 1980 Soyuz 37 • Salyut 6 • Progress 11 September 30-October 11, 1980 Principal Expedition 4 ends. Ryumin reported that his last 10 days on Salyut 6 were very busy. The Dneipers unloaded Progress 11, changed out the station’s communications equipment, and mothballed the station. Ryumin onsidered the communications gear changeout the most serious repair operation the Dneipers had carried out. Salyut 6 • Progress 11 October 11-November 28, 1980 ​====2.7.3.5 Salyut 6 Principal Expedition 5==== Leonid Kizim, Oleg Makarov, Gennadi Strekalov Crew code name—Mayak Soyuz-T 3, November 27-December 10, 1980 13 days in space Soyuz-T 3 • Salyut 6 • Progress 11 November 28-December 9, 1980 Experiments and repairs. The Mayaks were the first three-person space station crew since Soyuz 11 in 1971. Part of their mission was to further test the Soyuz-T. During their brief stay on Salyut 6, they performed the usual experiments using the Splav and Kristall units, and studied “biological objects” they brought with them in Soyuz-T 3. They used the Svetoblok and Oazis units. Much of their time, however, was devoted to space station maintenance. On December 2 they commenced conducting the Mikroklimat experiment to assess the station’s living conditions, and began work on the thermal control system. They installed a new hydraulic unit with four pumps. On December 4 they replaced electronics in the Salyut 6 telemetry system. December 5 saw them repairing electrical system faults. Other repairs included replacement of a program and timing device in the onboard control system and replacement of a power supply unit for the compressor in the refueling system. The Salyut 6 Principal Expedition 4 crew in the TsUP provided the crew with advice as they made their repairs. On December 8 Progress 11 carried out an orbit correction for the complex. Soyuz-T 3 • Salyut 6 December 9-10, 1980 Salyut 6 December 10, 1980-January 26, 1981 Salyut 6 • Progress 12 January 26-March 13, 1981 ​====2.7.3.6 Salyut 6 Principal Expedition 6==== Vladimir Kovalyonok, Viktor Savinykh Crew code name—Foton Soyuz-T 4, March 12-May 26, 1981 75 days in space Soyuz-T 4 • Salyut 6 • Progress 12 March 13-19, 1981 Soyuz-T 4 • Salyut 6 March 19-23, 1981 Soyuz-T 4 • Salyut 6 • Soyuz 39 March 23-30, 1981 Soyuz 39 Intercosmos flight. Soyuz 39 docked with the first Mongolian cosmonaut aboard. The Fotons assisted the Intercosmos crew with station equipment and oriented the station according to the needs of the Visiting Expedition’s experiments. On March 24 the cosmonauts installed cosmic ray detectors in the work and transfer compartments. On March 26 the cosmonauts performed the Illyuminator (“viewing port”) experiment, which studied the degradation of the station’s viewports. On March 27 Kovalyonok and Savinykh used the Gologramma (“hologram”) apparatus to image a viewing port damaged by micrometeoroids. They repeated this March 28, when they also collected samples of the station’s air and microflora and removed the cosmic ray detectors for return to Earth. March 28-29 were largely devoted to studies of Mongolia from space. The Visiting Expedition crew checked out their spacecraft on March 29. The Soviet news service Tass noted that by March 29 Salyut 6 had conducted 20,140 revolutions of Earth. Soyuz-T 4 • Salyut 6 March 30-May 15, 1981 Soyuz-T 4 • Salyut 6 • Soyuz 40 May 15-22, 1981 Last Soyuz Ferry docks. Soyuz 40 was the last Soyuz Ferry and the last Soyuz spacecraft to dock with Salyut 6. It also ended the first phase of the Intercosmos program by carrying Romanian cosmonaut Dumitriu Prunariu and Soviet cosmonaut Leonid Popov to the station. Prunariu studied Earth’s magnetic field. Earth observations had to be delayed until the last day of his flight, when Salyut 6 at last passed over Romania in daylight. During this time the crew also tested the station’s orientation system. ​ Soyuz-T 4 • Salyut 6 May 22-26, 1981 Soyuz-T 4 orbital module • Salyut 6 May 26-31, 1981 Soyuz-T 4 leaves behind orbital module. This procedure was first followed on Soyuz-T 3, though then the module was left attached to the station for only a few hours. Salyut 6 May 31-June 19, 1981 Cosmos 1267 FGB • Salyut 6 June 19, 1981-July 29, 1982 Cosmos 1267 docks. Cosmos 1267 was the FGB component of a TKS vehicle launched on April 25, 1981. Its Merkur capsule had separated and landed in the Soviet Union on May 26. Salyut 6 held in reserve. Salyut 6’s replacement, Salyut 7, was launched on April 19, 1982. Salyut 6 remained in orbit, still docked to Cosmos 1267, at an average altitude of 385 km. The aged laboratory remained in orbit until after the conclusion of the joint Franco-Soviet mission to Salyut 7 (June 24-July 2), then was deorbited using the engines on Cosmos 1267. It may have been kept in orbit as a backup for the Franco-Soviet mission in the event Salyut 7 failed or had its launch delayed. Sending Chretien to Salyut 7 seems to have represented a change in plans—in 1979, a French publication had quoted Vladimir Shatalov, head of cosmonaut training, as saying that a French cosmonaut would visit Salyut 6. The same publication stated in 1981 that Cosmos 1267 had been scheduled to be undocked from Salyut 6 to make ready for the joint Franco-Soviet crew, but that it was more likely that they would dock with Salyut 7. ​==2.8 Salyut 7/DOS-6 (April 19, 1982-February 7, 1991)== 2.8.1 Salyut 7 Specifications2.8.1 Salyut 7 Specifications Length .................................................... about 16 m Maximum diameter .................................. 4.15 m Habitable volume ..................................... 90 m$^3$ Weight at launch ..................................... 19,824 kg Launch vehicle ......................................... Proton (three-stage) Orbital inclination ..................................... 51.6° Span across solar arrays .......................... 17 m Area of solar arrays .................................. 51 m$^2$ Number of solar arrays ............................. 3 Electricity available .................................. 4.5 kW Resupply carriers .................................... Soyuz-T, Progress, TKS Number of docking ports .......................... 2 Total manned missions ............................ 12 Total unmanned missions ........................ 15 Total long-duration missions ..................... 6 Number of main engines .......................... 2 Main engine thrust (each) ........................ 300 kg 2.8.2 Salyut 7 Notable Features2.8.2 Salyut 7 Notable Features In most ways very similar to Salyut 6 (figure 2-9). Below are some differences. Living conditions improved over those on Salyut 6. For example, Salyut 7 had hot plates for heating food and continuously available hot water. To kill bacteria on the station, two portholes admitted ultraviolet radiation. A large porthole for astronomy was added to the transfer compartment. All portholes were shielded from micrometeoroids by transparent covers when not in use. Improved exercise and medical facilities. A suite of X-ray detection instruments replaced the BST-1M multispectral telescope. Three sets of steerable solar arrays fitted with attachment points for extensions. Extensions would be added as the original arrays degraded in order to keep Salyut 7’s electrical supply at a useful level. 2.8.3 Salyut 7 Career2.8.3 Salyut 7 Career Changes in the configuration of the Salyut 7 station included dockings by Soyuz-T, Progress, the Cosmos 1443 TKS, and the Cosmos 1686 space station module, as well as Soyuz-T transfers from port to port. The icons on the following pages depict these changes. Aligned horizontally with each icon are names (arranged to match icon positions) of spacecraft and station modules depicted and the inclusive dates of the configuration. Port transfers are shown by flipping the Salyut icon and leaving the Soyuz icon in place because it was Salyut 7 that rotated during port transfers. The text blocks below the icons cover important hardware-related events, such as anomalies and EVAs. Refer to figure 2-10 for key to icons. For more information on Soyuz-T and Progress vehicles mentioned, see sections 1.12.3.3, and 1.10.4.3. For more information on the Cosmos 1443 TKS and Cosmos 1686 modified TKS, see sections 3.3.4 and 3.4. ​ Salyut 7 April 19-May 14, 1982 2.8.3.1 Salyut 7 Principal Expedition 12.8.3.1 Salyut 7 Principal Expedition 1 Anatoli Berezevoi, Valentin Lebedev Crew code name—Elbrus Launched in Soyuz-T 5, May 13, 1982 Landed in Soyuz-T 7, December 10, 1982 211 days in space Soyuz-T 5 • Salyut 7 May 14-25, 1982 Launch of Iskra 2. The Elbrus crew ejected a 28-kg amateur radio satellite from a Salyut 7 trash airlock on May 17. The Soviets called this the first launch of a communications satellite from a manned space vehicle. They did this ahead of the launch of two large geostationary satellites from the U.S. Space Shuttle (STS-5, November 11-16, 1982). Soyuz-T 5 • Salyut 7 • Progress 13 May 25-June 4, 1982 Violation of Progress docking procedure. The hatch from the work compartment to the intermediate compartment was to be closed when a Progress docked, but Lebedev and Berezevoi wished to watch the approach through an aft-facing porthole in the intermediate compartment. They therefore “clamped the endpoints of the hatch, thus simulating its closure for the TsUP’s benefit.” They forgot to remove the clamps after Progress 13 docked, giving the TsUP an indication that the hatch remained closed even though the Elbrus crew moved back and forth between Progress 13 and Salyut 7. The TsUP gently called them out for this violation of procedure. Unloading Progress 13. On May 25, the Elbrus crew reoriented Salyut 7 so the aft end of the Progress pointed toward Earth. This placed the station in gravity-gradient stabilization. Lebedev remarked in his diary that the attitude control jets were “very noisy,” and that they sounded like “hitting a barrel with a sledgehammer.” Of Salyut 7 during the unpacking of Progress 13, Lebedev said, “It looks like we’re getting ready to move or have just moved to a new apartment.” The following day the Elbrus crew closed the hatch from the work compartment into the intermediate compartment so the TsUP could pump fuel from Progress 13 to Salyut 7. The crew monitored the operation but played little active role in it. May 29 was spent organizing the supplies delivered. At the same time, according to Lebedev, “we filled the resupply ship with what we don’t need and tied them down with ropes. When I enter the resupply ship, it jingles with a metallic sound, so when we separate it will sound like a brass band.” Progress 13 pumped 300 liters of water aboard on May 31. On June 2 Progress 13 lowered the station’s orbit to 300 km to receive Soyuz T-6. ​ Soyuz-T 5 • Salyut 7 June 4-25, 1982 Taking a shower in space. June 12 was bath day on Salyut 7, the day the Elbrus crew was permitted its first monthly shower. Showering was a complicated process—so much so that the showers, which were expected to be completed by noon, lasted until after 6 p.m. On June 15 Lebedev reported that a brown residue had been deposited between the panes of Salyut 7’s UVtransparent portholes. The residue was apparently produced when UV radiation struck the rubber gasket surrounding the panes. Soyuz-T 5 • Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 6 June 25-July 2, 1982 Garbage disposal, and the French assessment of Salyut 7. During the stay of the Soyuz-T 6 Visiting Expedition, the Elbrus gave visiting Frenchman Jean-Loup Chretien “the honor” of ejecting a satellite—Salyut 7’s weekly bag of waste—from the small trash airlock. In his diary, Lebedev quoted Chretien as saying Salyut 7 “is simple, doesn’t look impressive, but is reliable.” Soyuz-T 5 • Salyut 7 July 2-12, 1982 Soyuz-T 5 • Salyut 7 • Progress 14 July 12-August 10, 1982 Plumbing problems. In his July 15 diary entry, Lebedev described how he woke in the middle of the night to urinate, only to find that the toilet (ASU system) overfill light was on. “If we were home, we could go outside,” he wrote. But that’s not a viable option up here, so I had to hold it for a whole hour while I pumped the urine out of the ASU.” Lebedev had other problems with the water system later in the day: for a time he believed he had pumped waste water into the fresh water, spoiling the entire 500 liter supply. Debris in the air and cleaning Salyut 7. In his diary for July 23, Lebedev described how dust, trash, food crumbs, and droplets of juice, coffee, and tea floated in Salyut 7’s air. Most eventually ended up on the cheesecloth which covered the intake grills of the station’s air circulation fans. He said that the crew periodically disposed of these and replaced them with new ones. He also described a “wet cleaning” of Salyut 7. Once a week the crew used wet napkins soaked with katamine (a scouring detergent) to wipe the panels, handrails, hatches, control panel surfaces, and table. They also opened the wall panels and vacuumed the cable bundles, pipes, and fan grills. EVA—space construction experiments. On July 30, after more than a week of preparation, Lebedev and Berezevoi conducted a 2.5 hr EVA. Opening the hatch from the transfer compartment to the station hull produced a outgust of lost screws and bolts, dust, and a pencil. Lebedev first installed a movie camera and a floodlight. Then he replaced samples on the Etalon space exposure experiment, a checkerboard of different materials. He deployed and attached himself to the Yakor foot restraint platform. Once there, he spent ​considerable time looking at the Earth and inspecting the station. Lebedev was impressed by how still and silent the station’s exterior seemed, given its complex and noisy interior mechanisms. He noted that the green insulation on Salyut 7 had already faded and become grayish, but was otherwise undamaged. He also noted two folded Yakor foot restraints and a cable winch near the base of one of the solar arrays. Part of the purpose of his EVA was to perform assembly and disassembly tasks to allow him to judge the feasibility of the next crew using these to put in place solar array extensions. Then the Elbrus replaced the micrometeoroid, Medusa biopolymer, and Elast thermo-insulation samples panels. Lebedev worked with the Istok panel, which tested his ability to turn bolts using a special wrench. When the station moved into sunlight, Lebedev could feel through his gloves that the EVA handrails became hot. The cosmonauts installed additional experiments before returning to the transfer compartment. After the EVA they spent a day storing their space suits. Lebedev found a 20-mm dent in his helmet, with a small split in the metal, possibly produced by striking it on apparatus in the transfer compartment. “Thank God the helmet is built with double layers of metal,” he wrote in his diary. Soyuz-T 5 • Salyut 7 August 10-20, 1982 Soyuz-T 5 • Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 7 August 20-27, 1982 Soyuz-T 7 Visiting Expedition. The Soyuz-T 7 crew (code name Dneiper) included Svetlana Savitskaya, the first woman to visit space in 20 years. She was given the orbital module of Soyuz-T 7 for privacy. The Soyuz-T 7 crew delivered experiments and mail from home to the Elbrus crew. On August 21 the five cosmonauts traded seat liners between the Soyuz-Ts. The Dneipers undocked in Soyuz-T 5, leaving the newer Soyuz-T 7 spacecraft for the longduration crew. Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 7 August 27-29, 1982 Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 7 August 29-September 20, 1982 SPort Transfer. Soyuz-T 7 was repositioned by rotating Salyut 7, freeing the aft port for Progress 15. Salyut 7 is home. On September 1 Lebedev concluded his diary entry: I look around the station and view it with a different attitude. Now I think of it as home. The whole place looks so familiar. Everything in it is so near and dear to me now. When I look at the interior of the station, I feel no alienation, no sense that my surroundings are temporary or strange. Everything is ours. We’ve touched every square millimeter and object in here. We know exactly where every piece of equipment is mounted, not from documentation but from memory. Many little details, such as photographs on the panels, children’s drawings, flowers, ​and green plants in the garden [the Oazis, Fiton, and other plant growth units], turn this high-tech complex into our warm and comfortable, if a little bit unusual, home. Emergency drills. On September 7 the cosmonauts practiced procedures which would come into play in the event of a depressurization of the station. The cosmonauts used a pressure measurement device called Diusa to calculate the time until the station’s pressure dropped to 500 mm/Hg. This would tell them how long they had to deactivate the station, gather experiment results and records, put on spacesuits, and enter their Soyuz-T. According to Lebedev’s diary, the most dangerous evacuation scenarios were those allowing 5 min or less for an escape. “In such a situation the station could not be saved,” he wrote. He also described a scenario in which their Soyuz-T suffered a leak (they would close the hatch leading into the damaged craft and await a rescue ship). According to Lebedev, “we have permission for an emergency landing anywhere on Earth, although we would certainly do everything to land on Soviet territory, or at least on the ground.” Specific contingency landing areas are the U.S. Midwest (90°-105° W, 42°-49° N), southern France, and the Sea of Okhotsk. A bag containing experiment results was always kept near the Soyuz-T. According to Lebedev, a pressure drop requiring an hour to reach the critical level would give the crew time to locate and repair the leak. This would be done by sealing off the different compartments until the damaged one was identified. In the event of a fire, the crew would turn off all electrical equipment, put on protective suits and respirators, and use a fire extinguisher. Progress 15 • Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 7 September 20-October 14, 1982 Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 7 October 14-November 2, 1982 Progress 16 • Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 7 November 2-December 10, 1982 Iskra 3. Progress 16 delivered the Iskra 3 satellite. It was deployed from the trash airlock on November 18. Progress 16 • Salyut 7 December 10-13, 1982 Salyut 7 December 13, 1982-March 10, 1983 Salyut 7 • Cosmos 1443 March 10-June 28, 1983 Cosmos 1443 docks. The third TKS vehicle was launched on March 2. After docking, the Cosmos 1443 propulsion system was used to lower the average orbit of the combination below 300 km. ​Soyuz-T 8 failure. The Soviets attempted to man Salyut 7 with the threeperson crew of Soyuz-T 8 on April 21. However, the Soyuz Igla approach system antenna was damaged during ascent. The crew attempted a manual docking, but were forced to call it off and return to Earth. Further attempts to man Salyut 7 could not take place for 2 months because of launch and abort lighting constraints. 2.8.3.2 Salyut 7 Principal Expedition 22.8.3.2 Salyut 7 Principal Expedition 2 Vladimir Lyakhov and Alexandr Alexandrov Crew code name—Proton Soyuz-T 9, June 27-November 23, 1983 149 days in space Soyuz-T 9 • Salyut 7 • Cosmos 1443 June 28-August 14, 1983 Protons unload Cosmos 1443. Almost immediately after docking at Salyut 7’s aft port, the Protons entered Cosmos 1443 and commenced transferring the 3.5 tons of cargo lining its walls to Salyut 7. Window impact. On July 27 a small object struck a Salyut 7 viewport. It blasted out a 4-mm crater, but did not penetrate the outer of the window’s two panes. The Soviets believed it was a member of the Delta Aquarid meteor shower, though it may have been a small piece of orbital debris. Soyuz-T 9 • Salyut 7 August 14-16, 1983 Casting off Cosmos 1443. The Protons loaded Cosmos 1443’s Merkur capsule with 350 kg of experiment results and hardware no longer in use. It could have held 500 kg, had they had that much to put in. Cosmos 1443 then undocked, in spite of Western predictions that the FGB component would remain attached to Salyut 7 as a space station module. The Merkur capsule soft-landed on August 23, and the FGB component continued in orbit until it was deorbited over the Pacific Ocean on September 19. Soyuz-T 9 • Salyut 7 August 16-19, 1983 Port Transfer. Soyuz-T 9 was repositioned by rotating Salyut 7, freeing the aft port for Progress 17. Soyuz-T 9 • Salyut 7 • Progress 17 August 19-September 17, 1983 Salyut 7 propulsion system failure. During refueling by Progress 17, the main oxidizer line of the Salyut 7 propulsion system ruptured. The seriousness of the malfunction was not immediately apparent in the West. However, after the malfunction, Salyut 7 had to rely on the main propulsion systems of visiting Progress freighters for maintaining orbital altitude. ​ Soyuz-T 9 • Salyut 7 September 17-October 22, 1983 Soyuz rocket launch failure. The Protons expected visitors in late September. On September 26 a Soyuz spacecraft bearing Vladimir Titov and Gennadi Strekalov stood atop a Soyuz booster at Baikonur Cosmodrome. About 90 sec before planned launch time, the booster caught fire. Titov and Strekalov, who had been unable to dock with Salyut 7 on the Soyuz-T 8 mission, were plucked free of the booster, which subsequently exploded. Soyuz-T 9 • Salyut 7 • Progress 18 October 22-November 13, 1983 First and second EVAs—solar array augmentations. During his EVA of July 30, 1982, Valentin Lebedev tested space assembly and disassembly techniques to pave the way for the augmentation of Salyut 7’s solar arrays. The station was designed to have its arrays augmented as their efficiency gradually diminished. The actual installation of the augmentation panels was to be done by “the new crew on the next mission.” The arrays were delivered by Cosmos 1443. However, the next mission, the three-person Soyuz-T 8, was unable to dock. The Protons docked with Salyut 7 in Soyuz-T 9, and removed the panels from Cosmos 1443 before casting it off. Soyuz-T 8 crewmen Titov and Strekalov, who were trained for the panel augmentation EVA, were then grounded by the September 26 Soyuz booster explosion. It was up to Lyakhov and Alexandrov to carry out the much-delayed augmentation EVAs. They used two Yakor foot restraints installed on Salyut 7 near the base of the solar array. Their first EVA, on November 1, lasted 2 hr, 49 min. The cosmonauts added a new panel to one edge of Salyut 7’s top (center) array. The second EVA, on November 3, was a repeat of the first. It lasted 2 hr, 55 min. Together the two new panels increased Salyut 7’s available electricity by 50%. The Protons replaced air lost through the EVAs from tanks in Progress 18 before casting it off. Progress 18’s main engine raised Salyut 7’s altitude to 356 km by 326 km on November 4. Soyuz-T 9 • Salyut 7 November 13-23, 1983 Salyut 7 November 23, 1983-February 9, 1984 ​====2.8.3.3 Salyut 7 Principal Expedition 3==== Leonid Kizim, Vladimir Solovyov, Oleg Atkov Crew code name—Mayak Launched in Soyuz-T 10, February 8, 1984 Landed in Soyuz-T 11, October 2, 1984 237 days in space Soyuz-T 10 • Salyut 7 February 9-22, 1984 Mayaks arrive. The three-person Mayak crew entered the darkened Salyut 7 station carrying flashlights. The cosmonauts commented on the burnt-metal odor of the drogue docking unit. By February 17, Salyut 7 was fully reactivated, and the cosmonauts had settled into a routine. Physician Oleg Atkov did household chores and monitored his own health and that of his colleagues, who conducted experiments. Soyuz-T 10 • Salyut 7 • Progress 19 February 22-March 31, 1984 Soyuz-T 10 • Salyut 7 March 31-April 4, 1984 Soyuz-T 10 • Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 11 April 4-11, 1984 Indian cosmonaut. Rakesh Sharma conducted an Earth observation program concentrating on India. He also did life sciences and materials processing experiments. Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 11 April 11-13, 1984 Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 11 April 13-17, 1984 Port Transfer. Soyuz-T 11 was repositioned to the front port by rotating Salyut 7, freeing the aft port for Progress 20. Progress 20 • Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 11 April 17-May 6, 1984 First, second, third, and fourth EVAs—first phase of Salyut 7 propulsion system repair. The propulsion systems of Progress spacecraft filled in for the Salyut 7 propulsion system after its main oxidizer line ruptured in September 1983. Progress 20 delivered a special ladder for reaching the area of the damaged line. In addition, before launch the exterior of Progress 20’s orbital ​module was fitted with a special extension with foot restraints, as well as with containers for 25 special tools. Kizim and Solovyov spent 4 hr, 15 min outside Salyut 7 on April 23. They attached the ladder and prepared the repair site. On April 26 the cosmonauts cut through thermal insulation and the station’s hull to reach the damaged plumbing. They installed a valve in the reserve propellant line before going back inside Salyut 7. The second EVA lasted about 5 hr. On April 29 they again returned to the repair site. They installed a new propellant line to bypass the damaged section in 2 hr, 45 min. During a fourth EVA, on May 4, Kizim and Solovyov installed a second bypass line and covered the opening in Salyut 7’s side with thermal insulation. However, they were unable to complete repairs because they lacked tools to close the bypassed propellant line. The fourth EVA lasted 2 hr, 45 min. Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 11 May 6-10, 1984 Progress 21 • Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 11 May 10-26, 1984 Fifth EVA—second solar array augmentation. Progress 21 delivered two 9 m2 solar array extensions, similar to those added by the Salyut 7 Principal Expedition 2 crew. Solovyov and Kizim added them in an EVA May 19 which lasted over 3 hr. During the EVA, Atkov remained inside Salyut 7. He rotated the array 180° to bring its other edge within reach of the spacewalkers, permitting them to attach the second panel without having to move their foot restraints and equipment. The handle used to operate the winch for raising the array broke, but the cosmonauts were able to complete the operation. Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 11 May 26-30, 1984 Progress 22 • Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 11 May 30-July 15, 1984 Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 11 July 15-18, 1984 Soyuz-T 12 • Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 11 July 18-29, 1984 Soyuz-T 12. The Pamirs, the second Visiting Expedition to visit the Mayaks, included veteran cosmonaut Vladimir Dzhanibekov, Buran shuttle program cosmonaut Igor Volk, and Svetlana Savitskaya. On July 25 Dzhanibekov and Savitskaya performed a 3 hr, 30 min EVA, during which they tested the URI multipurpose tool. They cut, welded, soldered, and coated metal samples. During the Pamirs’ stay, the six cosmonauts aboard Salyut 7 also conducted Rezonans tests and collected station air samples. ​ Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 11 July 29-August 16, 1984 Sixth EVA—propellant system repair completed. Soyuz-T 12 delivered a pneumatic hand press. The tool was used during an August 8 EVA to crush both ends of the bypassed fuel line, sealing it. Solovyov and Kizim also collected a piece of a solar array for analysis. In spite of the repair, Salyut 7’s main propulsion system was not used again to boost the station’s orbit. Progress 23 • Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 11 August 16-26, 1984 Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 11 August 26-October 2, 1984 Salyut 7 October 2, 1984-June 8, 1985 Salyut 7 comatose. In February the Salyut 7 space station abruptly ceased communicating with the TsUP. On March 2 the Soviet newspaper Pravda printed the following announcement: In view of the fact that the planned program of work on Salyut 7 has been fulfilled completely, at the present time the station has been deactivated and is continuing its flight in automatic mode. 2.8.3.4 Salyut 7 Principal Expedition 42.8.3.4 Salyut 7 Principal Expedition 4 Vladimir Dzhanibekov, Viktor Savinykh Crew code name—Pamir Soyuz-T 13, June 6-September 26, 1985 112 days in space Savinykh remained aboard Salyut 7 when Dzhanibekov departed in Soyuz-T 13. Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 13 June 8-23, 1985 Salyut 7 revived. The March 2 announcement notwithstanding, by the end of March the Soviets resolved to attempt a Salyut 7 rescue. The effort turned out to be one of the most impressive feats of in-space repairs in history. As the Pamirs approached the inert station, they saw that its solar arrays were pointing randomly as it rolled slowly about its long axis. They used a handheld laser range finder to judge their distance, and conducted a fly-around inspection to be certain the exterior was intact. Dzhanibekov noted that the thermal blankets on the transfer compartment had turned a dull gray from prolonged exposure to sunlight. Upon achieving hard dock—the first time a Soyuz docked with an inactive station—the crew confirmed through the electrical connectors in the docking collars that the Salyut 7 electrical system was dead. They carefully sampled the air in the station before opening the hatch. The station air was ​very cold, but breathable. Frost covered the walls and apparatus. The cosmonauts wore winter garb, including fur-lined hats, as they entered the station. The first order of business was to restore electric power. Of the eight batteries, all were dead, and two were destroyed. Dzhanibekov determined that a sensor had failed in the solar array pointing system, preventing the batteries from recharging. A telemetry radio problem prevented the TsUP from detecting the problem. Salyut 7 had quickly run down its batteries, shutting down all its systems and accounting for the break in radio contact. The cosmonauts set about recharging the batteries. They used Soyuz-T 13 to turn the station to put its solar arrays in sunlight. On June 10 they turned on the air heaters. The cosmonauts relied on the Soyuz-T 13 air regeneration system until they could get the Salyut 7 system back in order. On June 13 the attitude control system was successfully reactivated. This was cause for jubilation, as it meant a Progress bearing replacement parts could dock with Salyut 7. Wall heaters were turned on only after all the frost had evaporated, in order to prevent water from entering equipment. Normal atmospheric humidity was achieved only at the end of July. The station’s water tanks thawed by the end of June. Freezing destroyed the water heater, so the cosmonauts used a powerful television light to heat fluids. Progress 24 • Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 13 June 23-July 15, 1985 Progress 24. The freighter delivered propellant, solar array extensions, a new water heater, three new batteries, and about 40 kg of other replacement parts. Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 13 July 15-21, 1985 Cosmos 1669 • Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 13 July 21-August 29, 1985 Cosmos 1669. During its flight, the Soviets claimed Progress 1669 was a freeflyer prototype. Now it is known that the spacecraft was a Progress incorporating upgrades for use with Mir. EVA—third solar array augmentation. On August 2 the Pamirs stepped outside to add the third and final pair of solar array add-ons to Salyut 7. They wore new semirigid suits delivered by Progress 24. The EVA duration was about 5 hr. Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 13 August 29-September 18, 1985 ​====2.8.3.5 Salyut 7 Principal Expedition 5==== Vladimir Vasyutin, Viktor Savinykh, Alexandr Volkov Crew code name—Cheget Soyuz-T 14, September 17-November 21, 1985 65 days in space Savinykh returned with Vasyutin and Volkov in Soyuz-T 14. Savinykh’s total time in space (Principal Expedition 4 and Principal Expedition 5) was 177 days. Soyuz-T 14 • Salyut 7 • Soyuz-T 13 September 18-25, 1985 Soyuz-T 14 • Salyut 7 September 25-October 2, 1985 Soyuz-T 14 • Salyut 7 • Cosmos 1686 October 2-November 21, 1985 Cosmos 1686. The main goals of the Chegets were to receive Cosmos 1686, a modified TKS, and conduct spacewalks with application to future space stations. The first goal was achieved on October 2. Cosmos 1686 contained 4500 kg of freight, including large items like a girder to be assembled outside Salyut 7, and the Kristallizator materials processing apparatus. Vasyutin ill. However, the Chegets were unable to achieve their second goal. By late October Vasyutin was no longer helping with experiments because he was ill. On November 13 the cosmonauts began scrambling their communications with the TsUP. Return to Earth occurred soon after. Salyut 7 • Cosmos 1686 November 21, 1985-May 6, 1986 ​====2.8.3.6 Salyut 7 Principal Expedition 6==== Leonid Kizim, Vladimir Solovyov Crew code name—Mayak Soyuz-T 15, Arrived from Mir – May 6, 1986; Departed for Mir – June 25, 1986. 51 days on Salyut 7 See Mir Principal Expedition 1 note. Soyuz-T 15 • Salyut 7 • Cosmos 1686 May 6-June 25, 1986 First EVA—girder experiment. Vasyutin’s illness left loose ends on Salyut 7. Most notably, the Chegets were unable to perform EVAs with implications for the Mir program. On May 28 the Mayaks climbed outside to retrieve space exposure experiments and test the Ferma-Postroital (“girder-constructor”) device. A deployment canister converted a folded girder cartridge into a 15-m girder in only a few minutes. The girder was retracted by reversing the process at the end of the EVA. The EVA lasted 3 hr, 50 min. Second EVA—girder and welding experiments. On May 31 Kizim and Solovyov attached measurement devices to the top of the retracted girder, then re-extended it with an aim toward studying its rigidity. They then used an electron gun to weld several of the girder’s joints. The EVA lasted 5 hr. Salyut 7 • Cosmos 1686 June 25, 1986-February 7, 1991 Salyut 7 abandoned; reenters after 4 years. The Mayaks removed 20 instruments with a total mass of 350-400 kg from Salyut 7 before returning to Mir. Between August 19 and August 22, engines on Cosmos 1686 boosted Salyut 7 to a record-high mean orbital altitude of 475 km to forestall reentry. Atmospheric drag took its toll, however, and the station reentered over South America 54 mo later. Pieces of Salyut 7 and Cosmos 1686 were found in Argentina. ​ 2.9 Mir/DOS-7 (February 19, 1986-present)2.9 Mir/DOS-7 (February 19, 1986-present) The Mir space station is the centerpiece of the Russian manned space program. Its base block (figure 2-11) has been in orbit for 9 years. Continual modifications have more than tripled Mir’s original mass and increased its capabilities (figure 2-12) beyond those of any previous space station. Figure 2-11. Mir base block. The multiport node at the station’s forward end (left) has one longitudinal docking port and four lateral berthing ports. ​===2.9.1 Mir Specifications=== Mir base block Length .................................................... 13.13 m Maximum diameter ................................... 4.15 m Habitable volume ..................................... 90 m3 Weight at launch ....................................... 20,400 kg Launch vehicle ......................................... Proton (three-stage) Orbital inclination .................................... 51.6° Number of solar arrays ............................. 2 (3rd added by EVA) Span across solar arrays ........................... 29.73 m Area of solar arrays .................................. 76 m2 (98 sq/m w/third array) Electricity available .................................. 9-10 kW at 28.6 v Resupply carriers ...................................... Progress, Progress M Number of docking/berthing ports ............ 2 docking; 4 berthing Number of main engines .......................... 2 Main engine thrust (each) ......................... 300 kg Figure 2-12. The Mir complex as of June 1994, with docked Progress-M 23 (right) and Soyuz-TM 18 (left) spacecraft. ​ Mir complex (Mir base block—Kvant, Kvant 2, and Kristall) with docked Soyuz-TM and Progress-M spacecraft (as of November 15, 1994) Length ....................................................... 33 m Maximum span across habitable modules .................................................... ~28 m Maximum diameter of habitable modules .................................................... 4.35 m Habitable volume ..................................... 372 m3 Weight ...................................................... 93,649 kg Orbital inclination .................................... 51.6° Number of solar arrays ............................. 11 Area of solar arrays .................................. 224 m2 Span across solar arrays ........................... 29.73 m Electricity available (theoretical maximum) ................................................ ~27.8 kW Number of docking/berthing ports ........... 4 docking*; 4 berthing** Total manned missions ............................. 20 Total long-duration missions .................... 17 *Two of the docking ports are of APAS-89 androgynous design; two are standard Soyuz drogue units. The drogue ports are longitudinal. One is located on the Mir base block and another is at the aft of the Kvant module. The two APAS-89 ports are attached to the node on the lateral end of the Kristall module. **Two of the four berthing ports (that is, the lateral ports on the Mir base block) are occupied by the Kvant 2 and Kristall modules. However, the two occupied ports can still be freed for use by moving the berthed modules to another lateral berthing port with their Lyappa arms. The existing modules will be shuffled when the Spektr and Priroda modules are added to Mir. 2.9.2 Mir Base Block Detailed Description and Notable Features2.9.2 Mir Base Block Detailed Description and Notable Features The conical transfer compartment at the front of the DOS-type Salyut stations is replaced by a five-port docking and berthing node. Four ports are lateral, with their docking planes parallel to the station’s long axis. They are used to berth modules which have docked at the fifth, longitudinal port (the front port). There is no EVA hatch on the Mir base block, though before the arrival of Kvant 2 and Kristall the cosmonauts could egress through any of the five ports. The node is shorter than the Salyut 7 transfer compartment, accounting for Mir’s shorter overall length. The sixth docking port is located at the aft end of the base block. It closely resembles the aft ports on Salyut 6 and Salyut 7. It is notable because it has been occupied by the Kvant module since April 1987. Electrical connectors and ports for gas and fluids transfers which permitted Progress to service Mir prior to Kvant’s arrival now link Kvant and the Mir base block. Progress vehicles now dock with the aft port on Kvant and transfer fluids and gases through the module to the Mir base block through these ports. The forward longitudinal port of the Mir base block is equipped with ducts for transferring propellant and water from Progress-M supply ships. Gallium arsenide solar arrays produce a 30% increase in power density over Salyut 7’s silicon arrays (to 120 W/m2). The Soviets conducted many gallium arsenide experiments since 1978 on Salyut 6 and Salyut 7. Mir’s arrays have nearly twice the span of Salyut 7’s arrays. Mir was launched with a fixture on top of its small-diameter pressurized compartment for attachment of an auxiliary solar array. Mir was designed to be used with the Soviet Altair/SR geosynchronous voice and data relay satellites (figure 2-13). These are satellites operated under the ubiquitous Cosmos designation. The satellite system is sometimes designated SDRN (Satellite Data Relay Network) or Luch. A large antenna for radio communications with the Altair/SR system extends from the aft end of Mir. Although most Mir trash is disposed of in the cargo compartments of Progress freighters, Mir, like its DOS-type Salyut predecessors, has a small airlock which can be used for ​ trash disposal. It is also used for scientific experiments requiring access to vacuum. Sergei Krikalev, who flew on the Space Shuttle Atlantis in February 1994 and spent two long-duration stints aboard Mir, made several statements comparing conditions on the U.S. Shuttle with those on Mir. In general, Krikalev states that living conditions aboard Mir are more hospitable than those on the Shuttle. This he attributes to Mir’s being designed for long-duration flight, while the Shuttle is designed to support a crew for only short periods of time. Long stays in space also affect training and timeline preparation for Mir crews. Mir crews experience more “on-the-job-training” than Shuttle crews, because it is impossible to simulate a 6-month or 12-month stint on a station and train for every eventuality. Their schedules are much more loosely planned than those of Shuttle astronauts, who spend only a few precious days in space and must put virtually every minute to productive use. In addition, Mir cosmonauts have evenings and weekends off. (In practice, the cosmonauts often work in their free time, either because they are highly self-motivated or because experiments require it.) Krikalev further stated that living conditions on the station depend heavily on the preferences of the resident crew. Krikalev stated that levels of cleanliness and odors varied according to the standards the resident crew was willing to accept. Similarly, the level of clutter varied considerably. Krikalev stated that, on his stays, Mir was kept relatively tidy. The crews he was part of attempted to keep unused equipment and supplies behind the wall panels, and attempted to avoid attaching netting full of equipment to the station’s ceiling. Mir relies much more heavily on automation than previous DOS-type stations, part of a general Soviet trend toward increasing automation in manned spacecraft. This is also evidenced by Soyuz-TM and Progress-M modifications. A French publication called it “the first computerized station in orbit.” In addition to the station’s control computers, each cosmonaut has a personal computer. The station was launched with the Argon 16B computer. In 1990, its more capable Salyut 5B replacement, which had been delivered by Kvant 2 in 1989, was phased in. Mir was launched with its front longitudinal port equipped with the Kurs (“course”) rendezvous system used by Soyuz-TM (and now also by Progress-M). The rear port was equipped with the older Igla system so Progress freighters could continue to dock there, and also to permit docking by Igla-equipped Kvant in April 1987. The rear port of Kvant was equipped with both Igla and Kurs. The Igla system is no longer used. Attachment of the Kvant module blocked—apparently permanently— the orbit maintenance engines on the Mir base block. All orbit maintenance maneuvers since 1987 have been conducted by docked spacecraft (Progress, Progress-M, and Soyuz-TM). The Mir pressure hull is chemicallymilled aluminum sheet averaging 2 mm thick, welded to webs 4 mm thick. The hull is 5 mm thick in the area of the multiport docking unit, and 1.2 mm thick in the area of the small-diameter work compartment. The large-diameter compartment is covered by a 2-mm-thick radiator with a 20-mm standoff from the hull. Other portions of the hull are covered by a multilayer thermal blanket comprising on average 25 layers of aluminized Mylar and scrim. Each layer is 5 micrometers thick. Layers of kevlar-like material cover the thermal blanket. The cosmonauts have two separate cabins (pockets in the walls of the large-diameter compartment) for sleep and privacy. A sealed lavatory compartment is located in the wall aft of one of the compartments. Storage drawers take up much of the wall space in both the large- and small-diameter compartments. Mir has many portholes, with shutters to protect them from orbital debris impacts and deposits formed through use of the attitude control engines. Each cosmonaut cabin has a small porthole, and there is a porthole in the station’s “floor” for Earth observation. The lavatory compartment has a spherical hair-washing unit with rubber gaskets through which the head and hands can be inserted. The living area (large- and smalldiameter sections) measures 7.6 m in length. The small-diameter section has dark-green floor and light-green Figure 2-13. Altair/SR relay satellite. ​ walls; the large-diameter section has a brown floor and yellow walls. Both sections have white ceilings with fluorescent lighting. The exercise area of Mir is also a theater with equipment for watching videocassettes and listening to music while exercising. The Mir veloergometer exercise bike) can retract into the floor. There is also a treadmill/running track. Mir’s “sick bay” is a cabinet located in the frustum linking the large- and small-diameter sections of the living compartment, near the exercise area. Mir’s control console faces the forward docking unit, as on earlier DOS-type Salyuts. Two television screens permit face-to-face communications with the TsUP. Four more, arranged in pairs on either side of the hatch separating the living compartment from the multiport docking unit, permit monitoring of the modules attached to the multiport node (one screen per module). Different fates have been proposed for Mir over the past several years. At one time, a Buran space shuttle was to have delivered a new base block in 1992. Buran would have used a manipulator arm to pluck free the add-on modules on the existing base block and dock them to the new one. The old base block would then have been returned to Earth in Buran. According to Yuri Antoshechkin, Deputy Flight Director for Mir Systems, Mir will host its last crew in 1997, by which time its base block will have been in orbit for eleven years (more than twice as long as originally planned). It will continue flight in unmanned mode for a further year, serving as an experiment platform for a solar dynamic power system jointly developed by the U.S. and Russia. The station may then be deorbited over a preselected area of the Pacific Ocean, as was done with several of the Salyut stations. 2.9.3 Mir Career to Date2.9.3 Mir Career to Date Changes in the configuration of the Mir station have included dockings by new modules; assembly of new components; dockings by Soyuz-T, Soyuz-TM, Progress, and Progress-M spacecraft; and Soyuz-TM transfers from port to port. The icons on the following pages depict these changes. Aligned horizontally with each icon are names (arranged to match icon positions) of spacecraft and station modules depicted and the inclusive dates of the configuration. The Mir station is left in the same orientation (forward end left) throughout this section because it did not rotate during port transfers (as did Salyut 6 and Salyut 7). In later combinations in this section, Kvant sprouts an inclined bar, which is later capped with a small rectangle. This represents the Sofora girder and subsequent addition of the VDU thruster unit atop Sofora. The text blocks cover important hardware-related events, such as anomalies and EVAs. Refer to figure 2-10 for key to icons. For more information on Soyuz-T, Progress, Soyuz-TM, and Progress-M vehicles mentioned, see section 1.12.3.4, 1.10.4.4, 1.13.3, and 1.11.3. For more information on Kvant, Kvant 2, Kristall, and the Kvant FSU, see sections 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8.1. Mir February 19-March 15, 1986 Mir launch. Salyut 7/Cosmos 1686 remained in orbit while Mir was launched. Because it was a ton heavier than its precursors, Mir reached an initial mean altitude of only 235 km. It was maneuvered using its main engines to a mean altitude of 330 km within a few days. Mir launch time was set by the need to match planes with the Salyut 7/Cosmos 1686 complex for the planned transfer by Soyuz-T 15 from Mir to the older station. 2.9.3.1 Mir Principal Expedition 1 (Salyut 7 Principal Expedition 6)2.9.3.1 Mir Principal Expedition 1 (Salyut 7 Principal Expedition 6) Leonid Kizim, Vladimir Solovyov Crew code name—Mayak Soyuz-T 15, March 13-July 16, 1986 73 days on Mir Kizim and Solovyov stayed aboard Mir in two stints (52 days and 21 days) separated by a visit to Salyut 7 (51 days). Total time in space was 124 days. ​ Soyuz-T 15 • Mir March 15-21, 1986 Unusual docking procedure. The Soviets intended to dock Soyuz-T 15 with Mir’s forward port, leaving the aft port free for arriving Progress spacecraft. However, Soyuz-T 15, like its Soyuz-T precursors, was equipped with the Igla approach system, not the Kurs system used on Mir’s front port. Soyuz-T 15 approached Mir from behind. At 20 km Soyuz-T 15’s Igla system acquired its counterpart on Mir’s aft port. At 200 m the Igla system was shut off, and the Mayaks manually maneuvered around the station to dock at the front port. They used the same laser range finder used by Soyuz-T 13 to dock with the uncooperative Salyut 7 station in 1985. Soyuz-T 15 • Mir • Progress 25 March 21-April 20, 1986 Altair/SR tests. First tests of the Soviet data and voice relay system, the Altair/SR system, were conducted on March 29 using Mir’s large aft antenna and the geosynchronous (95° E) Cosmos 1700 satellite. Rezonans tests. The Mayaks conducted Rezonans tests of the Soyuz-T 15-Mir base block-Progress 25 complex on March 31. Soyuz-T 15 • Mir April 20-26, 1986 More Rezonans tests. The Mayaks subjected the Mir base block-Soyuz-T 15 assemblage to further Rezonans tests. They also for the first time placed Mir in gravity gradient stabilization mode, with its long axis pointed toward the center of the Earth, and tested the station’s atmosphere. Soyuz-T 15 • Mir • Progress 26 April 26-May 5, 1986 Getting ready for the transfer to Salyut 7. The Mayaks loaded Soyuz-T 15 with their personal belongings, plants grown on Mir, and other items in preparation for the trip to Salyut 7, which was about 4000 km ahead of Mir in a lower orbit. On May 4 Mir was lowered by 13 km to speed the approach to Salyut 7 and conserve Soyuz-T 15’s limited fuel supply for the transfer. Mir • Progress 26 May 5-23, 1986 Soyuz-T 15 transfers to Salyut 7. Soyuz-T 15 separated from Mir when Salyut 7 was 2500 km away. The crossing required 29 hr. Soyuz-TM 1 • Mir • Progress 26 May 23-29, 1986 Mir’s Soyuz tested. Just as Soyuz-T represented a Soyuz upgrade for Salyut 7, Soyuz-TM represented an upgrade for Mir. Soyuz-TM 1 arrived unmanned at the unoccupied station and remained for 9 days. ​ Mir • Progress 26 May 29-June 22, 1986 Mir June 22-26, 1986 Preparations to receive Soyuz-T 15. Mir maneuvered twice June 24-25, raising its orbit slightly and moving closer to Salyut 7. On June 25 Soyuz-T 15 undocked from Salyut 7 and began the 29-hr journey back to Mir. Soyuz-T 15 • Mir May 23-29, 1986 The Mayaks return to Mir. Soyuz-T 15 arrived at Mir with a cargo of 350-400 kg of instruments from Salyut 7. On July 3 Kizim surpassed Valeri Ryumin’s record for time spent in space. On July 6 he became the first human to spend a full year in space. The Mayaks spent their last 20 days on Mir conducting Earth observations. Mir July 16, 1986-January 18, 1987 Mir to remain unmanned until 1987. Shortly after the Mayaks returned to Earth, Soviet sources announced that Mir would not be staffed again in 1986. Cosmos 1700 fails. In September 1986 the Altair/SR relay satellite Cosmos 1700 ceased operating and drifted off its geosynchronous orbit position. Mir • Progress 27 January 18-February 7, 1987 Computer problems on Mir. Progress 27 boosted Mir’s mean altitude by 16 km to 345 km on January 26. Alexandr Laveikin, who was soon to be launched on Soyuz-TM 2 to Mir, told an interviewer during this period that only one of Mir’s computers was functional. 2.9.3.2 Mir Principal Expedition 2 (a)2.9.3.2 Mir Principal Expedition 2 (a) Yuri Romanenko, Alexandr Laveikin Crew code name—Tamyr Soyuz-TM 2, February 5-July 30, 1987 176 days in space See Mir Principal Expedition 2 (b) note. Soyuz-TM 2 • Mir • Progress 27 February 7-23, 1987 Soyuz-TM 2 • Mir February 23-March 5, 1987 For Icon Key, see page 76 ​ Soyuz-TM 2 • Mir • Progress 28 March 5-26, 1987 Soyuz-TM 2 • Mir March 26-April 9, 1987 Soyuz-TM 2 • Mir • Kvant with FSM April 9-12, 1987 Kvant misses Mir. Kvant consisted of the space station module (11 tons) anda unique FGB-based vehicle called the Functional Service Module (FSM)(9.6 tons). The FSM carried out major maneuvers on April 2 and April 5. On April 5 its Igla approach system began homing on Mir’s aft port. The Tamyrs retreated to Soyuz-TM 2 so that they could escape in the event the module got out of control. About 200 m out, the Igla system lost its lock on Mir’s aft port Igla antenna. The cosmonauts watched from within Soyuz-TM 2 as the Kvant/FSM combination passed within 10 m of the station. Kvant achieves soft dock. Kvant and its FSM drifted 400 km from Mir before being guided back for a second docking attempt. Soft-dock occurred early on April 9. Kvant’s probe unit would not retract fully, preventing hard docking between Mir and Kvant. The Soviets left Kvant soft-docked while they considered a solution. Maneuvers were impossible during this period, because the probe of the Kvant/FSM combination would wobble loosely in Mir’s aft port drogue unit, banging the docking collars together. Figure 2-14. Mir base block (left) and Kvant (right) (1987). Note third solar array added to the top of the Mir base block. It was delivered inside Kvant. Soyuz-TM and Progress vehicles omitted for clarity. ​ Emergency EVA and hard dock. On April 11 Romanenko and Laveikin exited Mir to examine and, if possible, repair the problem with Kvant. They discovered a foreign object lodged in the docking unit, probably a trash bag they had left between Progress 28 and Mir’s drogue. On command from the TsUP, Kvant extended its probe unit, permitting the cosmonauts to pull the object free and discard it into space. Kvant then successfully completed docking at a command from the ground. The EVA lasted 3 hr, 40 min. The Kvant FSM undocked from Kvant on April 12, freeing the module’s aft port to fill in for the Mir aft port (figure 2-14). Soyuz-TM 2 • Mir • Kvant April 12-23, 1987 'Unloading Kvant. The Tamyrs entered Kvant on April 13 and began unloading equipment into the base block. Kvant added 40 m3 of pressurized volume to Mir, bringing the total to about 130 m3. On April 16 the pointing motors on Mir’s two solar arrays were linked to sensors on Kvant. Kvant carried stowed solar arrays intended to be attached to a fixture on top of the small-diameter section of the base block. Soyuz-TM 2 • Mir • Kvant • Progress 29 April 23-May 11, 1987 Testing Kvant. Beginning April 30, the Tamyrs tested orienting the Mir complex using Kvant’s gyrodynes. In part this was in preparation for pointing the new module’s roughly 1000 kg of astrophysical instruments. Progress 29’s short stay. During this period, propellant was pumped through Kvant to Mir’s ODU for the first time. The Elektron system aboard Kvant, which produced oxygen by electrolysis of water, was readied on May 8. Soyuz-TM 2 • Mir • Kvant May 11-21, 1987 Mir power shortage. The Soviets acknowledged that Mir was short on electricity. The situation became particularly difficult when melts lasting days were conducted using Korund 1-M. The Tamyrs spent most of May conducting medical experiments and Earth resources photography, activities which required little electricity. Soyuz-TM 2 • Mir • Kvant • Progress 30 May 21-July 19, 1987 First and second EVAs—solar array installation. On June 12 the Tamyrs exited Mir’s multiport node for the first of two EVAs to install the solar array delivered by Kvant. There was insufficient room available in the multiport node for two spacesuited cosmonauts plus the main boom and first two sections of the new array, so Laveikin and Romanenko sealed the hatch between the Soyuz-TM 2 docking module and orbital module and left the hatch between the orbital module and the multiport node open, creating an extended airlock. One cosmonaut worked outside while the other handed out needed parts. The main boom of the array was an extendible girder like the one assembled outside Salyut 7 by the Mir Principal Expedition 1/Salyut 7 Principal Expedition 6 crew (Kizim and Solovyov, 1986). The first EVA lasted less than 2 hr. The second EVA, on June 16, installed the remainder of the ​solar array, attached its electrical connections to the Mir power system, and extended it to its full 10.6-m length. The new, 22-24 m3 array brought Mir’s total capacity to 11.4 kW. The EVA lasted 3 hr, 15 min. Kvant begins its astronomical work with a bang. The Roentgen Observatory on Kvant was uniquely placed to study Supernova 1987a in the Large Magellanic Cloud. The cosmonauts examined the exploding star during 115 sessions between June and September. Soyuz-TM 2 • Mir • Kvant July 19-24, 1987 2.9.3.3 Mir Principal Expedition 2 (b)2.9.3.3 Mir Principal Expedition 2 (b) Yuri Romanenko, Alexandr Alexandrov Crew code name–Tamyr Soyuz-TM 3, July 22-December 29, 1987 160 days in space Romanenko remained on Mir after Laveikin’s departure in Soyuz-TM 2. Laveikin replaced by Alexandrov from Soyuz-TM 3. Romanenko’s total stay time on long-duration expeditions Mir-2 (a) and Mir-2 (b) was 336 days. Soyuz-TM 2 • Mir • Kvant • Soyuz-TM 3 July 24-29, 1987 Soyuz-TM 3. Syrian guest cosmonaut Mohammed Faris and Soviet cosmonaut Alexandr Viktorenko returned to Earth in Soyuz-TM 2 with Alexandr Laveikin, who was diagnosed by ground-based doctors as having minor heart problems. He was replaced by Alexandr Alexandrov. The Visiting Expedition observed Syria and conducted materials processing experiments. Mir • Kvant • Soyuz-TM 3 July 29-30, 1987 Soyuz-TM 3 • Mir • Kvant July 30-August 5, 1987 Soyuz-TM 3 • Mir • Kvant • Progress 31 August 5-September 21, 1987 X-rays from Supernova 1987a. On August 10 the astrophysical instruments on Kvant became the first to detect X-rays from Supernova 1987a. On August 31 the cosmonauts conducted a preplanned emergency evacuation drill, retreating to Soyuz-TM 3. Soyuz-TM 3 • Mir • Kvant September 21-26, 1987 ​ Soyuz-TM 3 • Mir • Kvant • Progress 32 September 26-November 17, 1987 Progress 32 docking test. At 0409 UT on November 6, Progress 32 backed away from Mir to 2.5 km. It redocked at 0547 UT, in a test designed to study ways of reducing the amount of fuel used during approach and docking operations. Soyuz-TM 3 • Mir • Kvant November 17-23, 1987 Soyuz-TM 3 • Mir • Kvant • Progress 33 November 23-December 19, 1987 Kvant problems. By late in the year, investigators in Britain and Holland noted sporadic problems with their TTM wide-angle X-ray camera and with ESA’s Sirene 2 gas-scintillation proportional counter. They queried the TsUP in Moscow as to whether crew activity could be causing interference with the instruments. Cosmos 1897. This was a communications relay satellite of the Altair/SR series, designed to increase the amount of time Mir could be in touch with the TsUP on each orbit. It was launched on November 26 and stationed in geosynchronous orbit at 95° E. At the same time, fatigue reduced the cosmonauts’ workday to 4.5 hr. 2.9.3.4 Mir Principal Expedition 32.9.3.4 Mir Principal Expedition 3 Vladimir Titov, Musa Manarov Crew code name—Okean Launched in Soyuz-TM 4, December 21, 1987 Landed in Soyuz-TM 6, December 21, 1988 365 days in space Valeri Polyakov joined Titov and Manarov on Mir August 31, 1988, arriving on Soyuz-TM 6. See Mir Principal Expedition 4 note. Soyuz-TM 3 • Mir • Kvant December 19-23, 1987 Handover. Before departing Mir, Romanenko and Alexandrov demonstrated use of EVA equipment to the Okeans. The Okeans delivered biological experiments, including the Aynur biological crystal growth apparatus, which they installed in Kvant. The combined crews conducted an evacuation drill, with the Mir computer simulating an emergency. ​Page:RP1357.pdf/129 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/130 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/131 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/132 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/133 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/134 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/135 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/136 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/137 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/138 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/139 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/140 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/141 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/142 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/143 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/144 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/145 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/146 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/147 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/148 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/149 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/150 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/151 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/152 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/153 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/154 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/155 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/156 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/157 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/158 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/159 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/160 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/161 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/162 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/163 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/164 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/165 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/166 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/167 ​Page:RP1357.pdf/168 ​ Figure 3-1. Station modules and tugs evolution. The chart above summarizes the evolution of vehicles originally developed as transport craft for the Almaz space station program and subsequently reapplied to many new functions. The narrow light gray arrow coming down from the top leads from the Soyuz Programs chart (figure 1-1). The broad gray arrows trace what is generally known in the West about the evolution of Soviet/Russian space station modules and tugs. The black-lined box encloses the TKS program, and the black arrows (solid and dashed) lead to the Station Programs chart (figure 2-1). ||
* ↑ Konstantin Tsiolkovskii, Beyond the Planet Earth, Pergamon Press, 1960, pp. 8-10.
* ↑ Christian Lardier, “Proton Celebrates its 25th Anniversary,” Aviation Magazine International, No. 1022, February 15-30, 1991, pp. 53-55.
* ↑ I. B. Afanasyev, “Unknown Spacecraft (From the History of the Soviet Space Program),” What’s New in Life, Science, and Technology: Space Program and Astronomy Series, No. 12, December 1991. Translated in JPRS Report, Science & Technology, Central Eurasia: Space, October 5, 1993 (JPRS-USP-93-005), p. 6.
* ↑ Dmitri Payson, “Without the Secret Stamp: Salyut and Star Wars,” Rossiskiye Vesti, November 21, 1992, p. 4. Translated in JPRS Report, Science & Technology, Central Eurasia: Space, March 25, 1993 (JPRS-USP-93-001), p. 67.
* ↑ Payson, March 25, 1993, p. 67.
* ↑ Afanasyev, p. 18.
* ↑ Afanasyev, p. 19.
* ↑ Dmitri Payson, “We’ll Build a Space Station for a Piece of Bread,” Rossiskiye Vesti, June 1, 1993, p. 8. Translated in JPRS Report, Science & Technology, Central Eurasia: Space, June 28, 1993 (JPRSUSP-93-003), p. 12.
* ↑ Payson, March 25, 1993, p. 67.
* ↑ Afanasyev, p. 20.
* ↑ Payson, June 28, 1993, p. 12.
* ↑ Andrei Vaganov, “A Project: We May Still the Sky [sic] in Diamonds,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta, September 17, 1992, p. 6. Translated in JPRS Report, Science & Technology, Central Eurasia: Space, November 17, 1992 (JPRS-USP-92-006), p. 19.
* ↑ Afanasyev, p. 22.
* ↑ David S. F. Portree, Thirty Years Together: A Chronology of U.S.-Soviet Space Cooperation, NASA CR-185707, February 1993, p. 19.
* ↑ Letter, Christopher C. Kraft, Director, NASA Johnson Space Center, to John F. Yardley, NASA Associate Director of Manned Space Flight, January 13, 1975.
* ↑ “Record of NASA/Soviet Academy Discussions, October 19-22, 1976,” NASA Internal Document, November 1976.
* ↑ Buyer’s Guide: Almaz Radar Remote Sensing Satellite, Space Commerce Corporation, not dated (c. 1990), p. 2.
* ↑ Afanasyev, pp. 22-23.
* ↑ Vaganov, p. 19.
* ↑ “Despite Terrestrial Difficulties,” Vechernaya Moskva, August 2, 1993, p. 7. Translated in JPRS Report, Science & Technology, Central Eurasia: Space, October 5, 1993 (JPRSUSP-93-005), pp. 13-14.
* ↑ “Agreement Between the U.S.S.R. Academy of Sciences and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration of the U.S.A. on Cooperation in the Area of Manned Space Flight,” May 11, 1977.
* ↑ Interviews, David S. F. Portree with Clarke Covington, June 13 and 28, 1994.
* ↑ Nicholas Johnson, Handbook of Soviet Manned Space Flight, Univelt, 1980, pp. 224-225.
* ↑ Payson, March 25, 1993, p. 20.
* ↑ Boris Petrov, “Orbital Stations,” Nauka i Zhian, April 3, 1973. Translated in Spaceflight, No. 8, August 1973, p. 290. Translation supplied by Soviet Novosti Press Agency.
* ↑ Neville Kidger, “Almaz: A Diamond Out of Darkness,” Spaceflight, March 1994, p. 87.
* ↑ Afanasyev, p. 20.
* ↑ Afanasyev, p. 19.
* ↑ Johnson, 1980, p. 302, 304.
* ↑ Afanasyev, p. 19.
* ↑ K. P. Feoktistov, “Scientific Orbital Complex,” What’s New in Life, Science, and Technology: Space Program and Astronomy Series, No. 3, 1980, pp. 1-63. Translated in JPRS L/9145, USSR Report, June 17, 1980, p. 4.
* ↑ Charles Sheldon, Soviet Space Programs, 1971-1975, Vol. 1, Library of Congress, 1976, p. 209.
* ↑ Sheldon, pp. 208, 210.
* ↑ Johnson, 1980, pp. 249-250.
* ↑ Feoktistov, p. 19.
* ↑ Feoktistov, pp. 17, 32.
* ↑ Feoktistov, pp. 17-18.
* ↑ Johnson, 1980, p. 259.
* ↑ Johnson, 1980, pp. 336-337.
* ↑ Gordon Hooper, “Missions to Salyut 6,” Spaceflight, June 1978, pp. 230-232.
* ↑ Interview, David S. F. Portree with Sergei Krikalev, February 28, 1994.
* ↑ Gordon Hooper, “Missions to Salyut 6,” Spaceflight, March 1979, pp. 127-129.
* ↑ Johnson, 1980, p. 352.
* ↑ Johnson, 1980, p. 355.
* ↑ Johnson, 1980, p. 362.
* ↑ E. Grigorov and N. Pavlov, “Using Terrestrial Analogs,” Aviatsiya i Kosmonavtika, No. 11, 1979, pp. 34-35. Translated in JPRS 75430, USSR Report, Space, No. 4, April 2, 1980, pp. 3-4.
* ↑ Grigorov and Pavlov, pp. 3-4.
* ↑ Valeri Ryumin, A Year Away from Earth: A Cosmonaut’s Diary, Molodaya Gvardiya, 1987, pp. 1-207. Translated in JPRS Report, Science & Technology, USSR: Space, February 12, 1990 (JPRS-USP-90-002-L), p. 6.
* ↑ Johnson, 1980, p. 365.
* ↑ Ryumin, pp. 8-9.
* ↑ Ryumin, pp. 13-14.
* ↑ Ryumin, p. 15.
* ↑ Johnson, 1980, p. 369-370.
* ↑ N. S. Kardashev, A. I. Savin, M. B. Zakson, A. G. Sokolov, and V. P. Feoktistov, “The First Radio Telescope in Space,” Zemlya i Vselennaya, No. 4, July-August 1980, pp. 2-9. Translated in JPRS 76578, USSR Report, Space, No. 7, October 8, 1980, pp. 1-7.
* ↑ Ryumin, pp. 16-18.
* ↑ Johnson, 1980, pp. 371-372.
* ↑ I. Melenevskiy, “Soft Landing,” TRUD, March 27, 1980, p. 5. Translated in JPRS 75678, USSR Report, Space, No. 5, May 12, 1980, pp. 1-3.
* ↑ Nicholas Johnson, Soviet Space Programs 1980-1985, Univelt, 1987, p. 151.
* ↑ Ryumin, p. 32.
* ↑ Ryumin, p. 38.
* ↑ Ryumin, p. 47.
* ↑ Ryumin, p. 48.
* ↑ Ryumin, pp. 48-49.
* ↑ Ryumin, p. 51.
* ↑ “Chronology of Soyuz-T 3 Mission,” JPRS 77488, USSR Report, Space, No. 9, March 2, 1981, pp. 1-2. Compilation of transcripts of English-language broadcast reports from the Soviet news agency TASS, November 27-December 10, 1980.
* ↑ “Chronology of Soyuz-T 4 Missions,” JPRS 78264, USSR Report, Space, No. 11, June 10, 1981, pp. 2-4. Compilation of transcripts of English-language broadcast reports from the Soviet news agency TASS, March 19-30, 1981.
* ↑ Nicholas Johnson, The Soviet Year in Space 1982, Teledyne Brown Engineering, 1983, p. 27.
* ↑ Pierre Langereux, “New Cosmonauts are Preparing to Man Salyut 6,” Air et Cosmos, No. 786, November 10, 1979, p. 42. Translated in JPRS L/8858, USSR Report, Space, January 9, 1980, pp. 1-3.
* ↑ Pierre Langereux, “Cosmos 1267,” Air et Cosmos, October 1981, p. 39. Translated in JPRS L/10523, USSR Report, Space, May 18, 1982, p. 3.
* ↑ Johnson, 1983, p. 27.
* ↑ Valentin Lebedev, Diary of a Cosmonaut: 211 Days in Space, Bantam, 1990, pp. 41, 46.
* ↑ Lebedev, pp. 40-54.
* ↑ Lebedev, pp. 73, 77.
* ↑ Lebedev, pp. 93-94.
* ↑ Lebedev, pp. 117, 119.
* ↑ Lebedev, p. 135.
* ↑ Lebedev, pp. 131-158.
* ↑ Johnson, 1983, p. 28.
* ↑ Lebedev, pp. 169-201.
* ↑ Lebedev, p. 217.
* ↑ James R. Asker, “Soviet Cosmonauts Plan Daily for U.S. Emergency Landings,” Aviation Week & Space Technology, July 22, 1991, pp. 21-22.
* ↑ Lebedev, pp. 227-228.
* ↑ Nicholas Johnson, The Soviet Year in Space: 1983, Teledyne Brown Engineering, 1984, P.41
* ↑ David S. F. Portree and Joseph P. Loftus, Jr., Orbital Debris and Near-Earth Environmental Management: A Chronology, NASA RP 1320, December 1993, p. 43.
* ↑ Johnson, 1984, p. 43.
* ↑ “Emergency Rescue during Soyuz-T 8 Failure Recalled,” abstract in JPRS Report, Science & Technology, USSR:Space, August 19, 1987, p. 91, of an article in Krasnaya Zvezda, May 30, 1987, p. 4. [In the title the JPRS Report incorrectly identifies the Soyuz-T 10a pad abort as Soyuz-T 8, but all other information appears accurate.]
* ↑ Lebedev, p. 153.
* ↑ “Manned Flight Chronology,” USSR Report, Space (JPRSUSP-84-001), January 26, 1984, p. 2-3. Compilation of transcripts of English-language broadcast reports from the Soviet news agency TASS, November 1, 3, 1984.
* ↑ Johnson, 1984, p. 45.
* ↑ Nicholas Johnson, The Soviet Year in Space: 1984, Teledyne Brown Engineering, 1985, pp. 40-42.
* ↑ Pravda, March 2, 1985, p. 2. Translated in Nicholas Johnson, The Soviet Year in Space: 1985, Teledyne Brown Engineering, 1986, p. 54.
* ↑ Johnson, 1986, p. 54.
* ↑ Interview, David S. F. Portree with Sergei Krikalev, February 28, 1994.
* ↑ Interview, David S. F. Portree with Sergei Krikalev, February 28, 1994.
* ↑ Albert Ducrocq, Air et Cosmos, No. 1131, February 21, 1987, pp. 41-42 [original title not given]. Translated in JPRS Report, Science & Technology, USSR: Space (JPRS-USP-87-004-L), June 18, 1987, p. 1, under title “French Commentator on Features of Mir Station.”
* ↑ Portree and Loftus, pp. 76-77.
* ↑ Ducrocq, p. 5.
* ↑ Shuttle/Mir Media Workshop, Mir Familiarization session, NASA Johnson Space Center, December 14, 1994.
* ↑ Nicholas Johnson, The Soviet Year in Space: 1986, Teledyne Brown Engineering, 1987, pp. 57-58.
* ↑ Nicholas Johnson, The Soviet Year in Space: 1987, Teledyne Brown Engineering, 1988, p. 84.
* ↑ Johnson, 1988, p. 88.
* ↑ Johnson, 1988, p. 89.
* ↑ Johnson, 1988, p. 91.
* ↑ Johnson, 1988, p. 94.
* ↑ Johnson, 1988, p. 96.
* ↑ J. Kelly Beatty, “The High-Flying Kvant Module,” Sky & Telescope, December 1987, p. 600.
* ↑ Johnson, 1988, p. 96.
* ↑ Nicholas Johnson, The Soviet Year in Space: 1990, Teledyne Brown Engineering, 1991, p. 48.