OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States v. Ninety-Five Barrels Alleged Apple Cider Vinegar

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States v. Ninety-Five Barrels Alleged Apple Cider Vinegar, 265 U.S. 438 (1924), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that apple cider vinegar is mislabeled when that vinegar is made from dried apples. The label at issue indicated that the vinegar was made from "selected" apples. Douglas Packing Company, the manufacturer, admitted to dehydrating fresh apples and then re-hydrating the apples with pure water to produce vinegar. Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 438
United States v. Ninety-Five Barrels Alleged Apple Cider Vinegar
Argued: April 10 and 11, 1924. --- Decided: June 2, 1924
The Attorney General and Mr. James A. Fowler, of Knoxville, Tenn., for the United States.
Messrs. Lawrence C. Spieth, John G. White, and Austin V. Cannon, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for respondents.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Nix

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
189 U.S. 199
United States v. Nix
Argued: December 18, 1902. --- Decided: March 2, 1903
Messrs. Felix Brannigan and Assistant Attorney General Pradt for United States.
Messrs. Franklin H. Mackey and Frank B. Crosthwaite for Nix.
Statement by Mr. Justice Brown:
This is a petition for marshal's fees for the district of Oklahoma, upon which the court of claims made the findings of fact set forth in the margin.
Mr. Justice Brown delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Nixon

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Nixon."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Nixon (235 U.S. 231)
* United States v. Nixon (418 U.S. 683)
# United States v. Nixon (235 U.S. 231)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
235 U.S. 231
United States v. Nixon (235 U.S. 231)
Argued: and submitted October 22, 1914. --- Decided: November 30, 1914
Assistant Attorney General Underwood for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. W. F. Evans and W. S.C.owherd for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice Lamar delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Noce

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
268 U.S. 613
United States v. Noce
Argued: April 30, 1925. --- Decided: June 8, 1925
The Attorney General and Mr. Asst. Atty. Gen. Letts, for the United states.
Mr. Samuel T. Ansell, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Who's Who in India Supplement 1 (1912)/Razi-ud-din Khan

​Razi-ud-din Khan, Khan Bahadur, Tahsildar, was first appointed Tahsildar in June 1891, and was promoted to the first grade in July, 1901. His title was conferred on the occasion of the recent Coronation Durbar, in recognition of his public services. Address: Pilibhit, U. P.
# Who's Who in India Supplement 1 (1912)/SIROHl — His Highness Maharajadhiraja Maharao Sir Kesri Singh Bahadur, G. C. I. E., K. C. S. I.

​SIROHl — His Highness Maharajadhiraja Maharao Sir Kesri Singh Bahadur, G. C. I. E., K. C. S. I., Maharao of — a Ruling Chief, whose biography appears in Part 1, page 96, of this work, was granted the hereditary title of Maharajadhiraja by His Excellency the Governor-General of India on the occasion of the recent Coronation Durbar.
# Who's Who in India Supplement 1 (1912)/Reception of Volunteer and Indian Officers

RECEPTION OF VOLUNTEER AND INDIAN OFFICERS
On the morning following the Durbar, His Majesty held a reception at his camp, when the Officers of the Volunteer Corps in India and the Indian Officers of His Majesty's Army in India were presented. With the latter were a number of Sub-Assistant Surgeons.
# Who's Who in India Supplement 1 (1912)/SITAMAU — His Highness Raja Sir Ram Singh, K. C. I. E.

​SITAMAU — His Highness Raja Sir Ram Singh, K. C. I. E., Raja of — a Ruling Chief , whose biography appears in Part I, page 57, of this work, was invested with the insignia of Knight Commander of the Order of the Indian Empire by His Majesty the King-Emperor on the occasion of the recent Coronation Durbar.
# Who's Who in India Supplement 1 (1912)/Ray, Bhimdal Lazarus Diwan

​Ray, Bhimdal Lazarus Diwan, Sardar Bahadur, Holder of the King's Police Medal, Deputy Superintendent of Police, was born in 1857 and educated in Darjeeling Government School. He belongs to a respectable Gurkha family, and has thirty-two years of meritorious service under the British Government. The Sardar Bahadur entered the Bengal Police in 1879, previous to which he saw active service in the Indian Army, and he possesses two war medals testifying to his gallant conduct in the field. He was appointed Deputy Superintendent of Police, third grade, in 1910, and is now officiating as a Superintendent. His service was extended, in consideration of his meritorious conduct, in 1911, and in the
S. B. Bhimdal Diwan Ray (76)
​the previous year his merit was recognized by the grant of the King's Police Medal. Hi^ long service and faithful discharge of his duties were further recognized on the occasion of the recent Coronation Durbar by the bestowal on him of the title of Sardar Bahadur. Address: Rockwoodside, Darjeeling.
# Who's Who in India Supplement 1 (1912)/Ray, Maharaja, Kshaunish Chandra

​Ray, Maharaja, Kshaunish Chandra, of Krishnagar, Nuddea, belongs to the Nuddea Raj family, and is the only son of the late Maharaja Bahadur Kshitish Chandra Ray. He was born at Krishnagar on 29th October, 1890, and educated at home. The family trace their descent from Bhuttanarayan, a Kanauj chief, who founded a principality near Vikrampur, in Eastern Bengal. The first descendant of importance of this chief was Bhabanundo Majumdar, who is said to have founded the Nuddea Raj. He ​assisted the Moghal Emperor Akhbar in the subjugation of the Chief of Jessore; he also obtained fifteen parganas from Jahangir in 1606, together with the title of Raja. The most remarkable scion of the house was Kishan Chandra Ray, a great scholar and patron of the Arts. He was considered a leader of Hindu society in his day and played an important part in the establishment of the British power in Bengal. His advice was sought by the leading men of Murshidabad as to the best way of displacing Suraj-ud-Daula. For the services rendered by him Lord Give conferred on him the title of Rajendra Bahadur: he also received a sword, and some of the guns used at Plassey. During Kishen Chandra's time the zemindari consisted of 84 parganas, with a revenue assessed at 6 1/2 lakhs. At present the estate pays a revenue of Rs. 62,542, and its value is estimated at Rs. 2,17,790. The Maharaja received his title as a personal distinction on the occasion of the recent Coronation Durbar. He has also been accorded the privilege of the "private entree" by H. E. the Vicerory. He is eighth in descent from Kishen Chandra. Address: Krishnagar, Nuddea. Bengal.
MAHARAJA KSHAUNISH CHANDRA RAY.
# Who's Who in India Supplement 1 (1912)/Ray Chaudhuri, the Hon'ble Raja Mahendra Ranjan

​Ray Chaudhuri, the Hon'ble Raja Mahendra Ranjan, late Member of the Legislative Council of Eastern Bengal and Assam, was granted the personal title of Raja on the occasion of the recent Coronation Durbar. Address : Kakina, Rangpur District, Bengal.
# Who's Who in India Supplement 1 (1912)/SIKKIM — His Highness Maharaja Sir Thotub Namgye, K. C. I. E.

​SIKKIM — His Highness Maharaja Sir Thotub Namgye, K. C. I. E., Maharaja of — a Ruling Chief, whose biography appears in Part I, page 104, of this work, was invested with the insignia of Knight Commander of the Order of the Indian Empire by His Majesty the King-Emperor on the occasion of the recent Coronation Durbar.
# Who's Who in India Supplement 1 (1912)/SOHAWAL— Raja Bhagat Raj Bahadur Singh

​SOHAWAL— Raja Bhagat Raj Bahadur Singh, Raja of — a Ruling Chief, whose biography appears in Part I, page 110, of this work, was granted the hereditary title of Raja by His Excellency the Governor-General of India on the occasion of the recent Coronation Durbar.
# Wherry v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
35 U.S. 338
Wherry v. United States
ON appeal from the district court of the United States for the district of Missouri.
The case is fully stated in the opinion of the court.
It was argued by Mr White, for the appellants; and by Mr Butler, attorney-general, for the United States.
Mr Justice BALDWIN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Where the wild things are

* information about this edition.
* related portals: Guantanamo.
* sister projects: Commons category, Wikidata item.

# Where the wild things are

Story and photos Army Sergeant Dani White
Many of us two-legged inhabitants of Naval Station Guantanamo Bay have noticed our fellow four-legged neighbors wandering around our living and work areas.
The cyclura nubila, also known as the Cuban rock iguana, the hutia – or banana rat as GTMO residents call it – and plain old stray cats may be the creatures residents notice the most.
Though we interact with them on a regular basis, people may not realize that the way we treat these creatures can have a serious effect on them.
“If people feed the iguanas, they will become food aggressive,” said veterinarian Army Capt. Miriam Lovell. “When this happens we have to relocate them to a new area away from people.”
When iguanas are moved to a new location, another iguana may already inhabit that area. This means that the two iguanas will fight and kill one another for the territory. Animals that develop food aggression can also harm the people around them. People can be accidently bitten if they try to feed the animals.
Bites or scratches from wild animals can cause humans to develop serious symptoms. “Wild animals and strays carry a number of infectious diseases,” Lovell said.” People can get rabies, toxoplasmosis, intestinal parasites, ring worm, and bacterial infections.”
What many people may not know is that GTMO is also a wildlife preservation area, protecting the endangered species that live on the base.
Some of the wildlife on GTMO whose population numbers are low are the hutia, the Cuban kite (a bird), Cuban boa and the Cuban rock iguana.
“These creatures were here first,” Lovell said. “We have amazing endangered animals and they need to be protected.” Lovell added that it is best to give the wild animals on GTMO their space and should be observed from a distance.
Pet owners should keep an eye out for their pets. Lovell treats many house pets that try to eat the poisonous toad that resides around GTMO.
People should also refrain from petting and feeding the stray cats that roam the area. Animal control constantly collects the stray cats and takes them to the GTMO veterinary clinic. She examines them for major health issues and checks to see if they are microchipped.
“If the animals are not microchipped we humanly euthanize them,” Lovell said. “If they are microchipped and adoptable, we will find them a home.”
We share this small strip of land with diverse wildlife, and like any good neighbor, we are responsible for treating these critters and their home as we would want guests to treat our mother’s house when we invite them over for Thanksgiving dinner – with respect and kindness.
# Where the Dead Men Lie/Jim's Whip

Yes! there it hangs upon the wall And never gives a sound: The hand that trimmed its greenhide fall Is hidden underground— There, in that patch of sallee shade, Beneath that grassy mound.
I never take it from the wall: That whip belonged to him— The man I singled from them all: He was my husband, Jim. I see him now—so straight and tall, So long and lithe of limb.
​That whip was with him night and day When he was on the track: I've often heard him laugh and say That when they heard it crack, After the breaking of the drought, The cattle all came back.
And all the time that Jim was here, A-working on the run, I'd hear that whip ring sharp and clear Just about set of sun, To let me know that he was near And that his work was done.
I was away that afternoon, Penning the calves, when—bang! I heard his whip: 'twas rather soon: A thousand echoes rang And died away among the hills, As toward the hut I sprang.
I made the tea and waited, but, Seized by a sudden whim, I went and sat outside the hut And watched the light grow dim: I waited there till after dark, But not a sign of Jim.
​The evening air was damp with dew: Just as the clock struck ten His horse came riderless—I knew What was the matter then ... Why should the Lord have singled out My Jim from other men?
I took the horse and found him where He lay beneath the sky, With blood all clotted in his hair. I felt too dazed to cry: I held him to me as I prayed To God that I might die.
But sometimes now I seem to hear— Just when the air grows chill— A single whip-crack, sharp and clear, Re-echo from the hill. That's Jim! to let me know he's near And thinking of me still.
# Where the Dead Men Lie/Josephus Riley

The rum was rich and rare: There were wagers in the air: The atmosphere was rosy, and the tongues were wagging free; But one was in the revel Whose occiput was level— Plain Josephus Riley, from the North Countree!
The conversation's flow Was not devoid of blow, And neither was it wanting in the mild, colloquial D With a most ingenuous smile, 'This here is not my style,' Said plain Josephus Riley, from the North Countree.
​'And I wouldn't be averse To emptying my purse, And laying some small wager with the present companee: To cut the matter short, Foot-racing is my forte,' Said plain Josephus Riley, from the North Countree.
​'I think it's on the cards I can run three hundred yards (The match to be decided where you gentlemen agree) Against your fleetest horse: The race would prove a source Of pleasure,' said Josephus, from the North Countree.
'To equalise the task, This little start I ask: The rider, ere he follows, must imbibe a cup of tea— A simple breakfast-cup He will have to swallow up. That's me!—Josephus Riley, from the North Countree.'
Then a knowing 'un looked wise— Begged to apologise; But might he ask what temp'rature the liquid was to be? Would it come from out the pot Milkless, steaming, boiling hot? 'Oh, not at all!' said Riley, from the North Countree.
'Allow me to explain: I do observe with pain This jocular reflection on my native honestee. My bump of truth is huge: I'd scorn a subterfuge,' Said plain Josephus Riley, from the North Countree.
​'Before the parties start I'll take the Judge apart To prove, by tasting, whether I have tampered with the tea; And I beg to state again Your suspicions give me pain,' Said plain Josephus Riley, from the North Countree.
Then they all were satisfied That the match was 'boneefied': The bond was signed, and Riley went to 'preparate' the tea; But his slow, ambiguous smile Would have seemed to token guile In any man but Riley, from the North Countree.
​He brought the fatal cup By its saucer covered up: The Judge examined its contents with awful gravitee; Then read the papers o'er, But could not find a flaw: 'Wade in, Josephus Riley, from the North Countree!'
Then the wagerer just bowed, And, passing through the crowd, He handed up the beverage unto the wageree; And off across the flat, Springing gaily, pit-a-pat, Went plain Josephus Riley, from the North Countree.
​But behind him what a yell Of execration fell From lips that lent themselves to shapes of great profanitee! For the people of that town Were done a lovely brown By plain Josephus Riley, from the North Countree.
And here's the reason why: The tea was simply dry! You might eat it, but to drink it was impossibilitee; Yet, curious to state, Men did not appreciate This hum'rous innovation from the North Countree.
You'll understand, of course, That wager was a source Of very little profit to the hapless wageree; And, dating from that day, I much regret to say Men look askance at Riley, from the North Countree.
# Where the Dead Men Lie (poem)

Out on the wastes of the Never Never —  That's where the dead men lie! There where the heat-waves dance forever —  That's where the dead men lie! That's where the Earth's loved sons are keeping Endless tryst: not the west wind sweeping Feverish pinions can wake their sleeping —  Out where the dead men lie!
Where brown Summer and Death have mated —  That's where the dead men lie! Loving with fiery lust unsated —  That's where the dead men lie! Out where the grinning skulls bleach whitely Under the saltbush sparkling brightly; Out where the wild dogs chorus nightly —  That's where the dead men lie!
Deep in the yellow, flowing river —  That's where the dead men lie! Under the banks where the shadows quiver —  That's where the dead men lie! Where the platypus twists and doubles, Leaving a train of tiny bubbles. Rid at last of their earthly troubles —  That's where the dead men lie!
East and backward pale faces turning —  That's how the dead men lie! Gaunt arms stretched with a voiceless yearning —  That's how the dead men lie! Oft in the fragrant hush of nooning Hearing again their mother's crooning, Wrapt for aye in a dreamful swooning —  That's how the dead men lie!
Only the hand of Night can free them —  That's when the dead men fly! Only the frightened cattle see them —  See the dead men go by! Cloven hoofs beating out one measure, Bidding the stockmen know no leisure — That's when the dead men take their pleasure!  That's when the dead men fly!
Ask, too, the never-sleeping drover:  He sees the dead pass by; Hearing them call to their friends — the plover,  Hearing the dead men cry; Seeing their faces stealing, stealing, Hearing their laughter, pealing, pealing, Watching their grey forms wheeling, wheeling  Round where the cattle lie!
Strangled by thirst and fierce privation —  That's how the dead men die! Out on Moneygrub's farthest station —  That's how the dead men die! Hard-faced greybeards, youngsters callow; Some mounds cared for, some left fallow; Some deep down, yet others shallow.  Some having but the sky.
Moneygrub, as he sips his claret,  Looks with complacent eye Down at his watch-chain, eighteen carat —  There, in his club, hard by: Recks not that every link is stamped with Names of the men whose limbs are cramped with Too long lying in grave-mould, cramped with  Death where the dead men lie.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wherry v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
35 U.S. 338
Wherry v. United States
This is an appeal from the decree of the district court of Missouri, rejecting the claim of the appellants to sixteen hundred arpents of land in that state, for the confirmation of which they had filed their petition, pursuant to the provisions of the act of 1824 for the adjustment of land claims in that state.
The petition was in the form prescribed by the law; presenting a proper case for the jurisdiction of the court.
The claim of the petitioners was founded on an application by Mackey Wherry to the lieutenant-governor of Upper Louisiana, on the 15th of April 1802, for a grant of sixteen hundred arpents of land near the rivers Dardennes and Mississippi, in the vacant lands of the king, which he shall point out at the time of the survey. On the 18th of the same month this application was granted by the lieutenant-governor, with directions to survey the quantity demanded in a vacant place of the royal domain; but no survey appears to have been made before the 10th of March 1804.
As this grant contained no description of the lands granted, and was not located before the time prescribed by the act of 1824, submitting these cases to judicial cognizance; it comes directly within the point decided by this court in the case of John Smith, T. v. The United States at this term, and cannot be confirmed. It is therefore our opinion that the title of the petitioners to the land claimed and described in their petition is not valid.
The decree of the district court is affirmed.
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the district court of the United States for the district of Missouri, and was argued by counsel; on consideration whereof, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by this court, that the decree of the said district court in this cause be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Washington v. Oregon (297 U.S. 517)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
297 U.S. 517
Washington v. Oregon (297 U.S. 517)
Argued: Feb. 10, 11, 1936. --- Decided: March 2, 1936
Messrs. George G. Hannan and John H. Dunbar, both of Olympia, Wash., and John C. Hurspool, of Walla Walla, Wash., for the State of Washington.
Messrs. Charles Z. Randall, of Pendleton, Or., George T. Cochran, of La Grande, Or., and I. H. Van Winkle, of Salem, Or., for the State of Oregon.
Mr. Justice CARDOZO delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse