OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/18th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 46

Chap. XLVI.—An Act to procure the necessary surveys, plans, and estimates, upon the subject of roads and canals.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the ​The President to cause the necessary surveys to be made of such roads and canals as he may deem of national importance, &c.United States is hereby authorized to cause the necessary surveys, plans, and estimates, to be made of the routes of such roads and canals as he may deem of national importance, in a commercial or military point of view, or necessary for the transportation of the public mail; designating, in the case of each canal, what parts may be made capable of sloop navigation: the surveys, plans, and estimates, for each, when completed, to be laid before Congress.
Two or more skilful engineers to be employed.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That, to carry into effect the objects of this act, the President be, and he is hereby, authorized to employ two or more skilful civil engineers, and such officers of the corps of engineers, or who may be detailed to do duty with that corps, as he may think proper; and the sum of thirty thousand dollars be, and the same is hereby, appropriated, to be paid out of any moneys in the treasury, not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, April 30, 1824.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/18th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 47

Chap. XLVII.—An Act rewarding the officers and crews of two gigs, or small boats, under the command of Lieutenant Francis H. Gregory, of the United States’ Navy.
3000 dollars to be distributed as prize money to Lieutenant Francis H. Gregory, &c. for the capture and destruction of a British gunboat, in June, 1814.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be, and he is hereby, authorized to have distributed as prize money to Lieutenant Francis H. Gregory, of the United States’ navy, and the officers and crews of two gigs, or small boats, under his command, or to their legal representatives, the sum of three thousand dollars, for the captures and destruction of a British gun-boat, called the Black Snake, in the river St. Lawrence, on the nineteenth of June, one thousand eight hundred and fourteen, and that the said sum of three thousand dollars be, and the same is hereby, appropriated, for the purpose aforesaid, out of any moneys in the treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, May 4, 1824.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/18th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 65

Chap. LXV.—An Act declaring the consent of Congress to certain acts of the state of Alabama.
Consent of Congress given to the acts of the general assembly of Alabama, of the 30th and 31st Dec., 1823.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the consent of Congress be, and hereby is, granted to the operation of an act of the general assembly of the state of Alabama, passed on the thirtieth day of December, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-three, entitled “An act to improve the navigation of the Coosa river, and to aid in its connection with the Tennessee waters;” and also, to an act, passed on the thirty-first of December, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-three, entitled “An act to improve the navigation of the Tennessee river.”
Approved, May 13, 1824.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/18th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 66

Chap. LXVI.—An Act altering the times of holding the courts in the District of Columbia.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the circuit court for ​Session of the circuit court of the District of Columbia.Washington county, in the District of Columbia, shall hereafter commence and be held on the third Monday of December, and first Monday of May, in each year, instead of the days now fixed by law; and the circuit court for Alexandria county, in said district, on the fourth Monday of November and second Monday of April, instead of the days now established by law; and that all process whatsoever, now issued, or which may be issued, in the respective counties of Washington and Alexandria, in said district, returnable to the days, respectively, now fixed by law, for each of the said counties, shall be returnable, and returned, on the days prescribed by this act; and all causes, recognisances, pleas, and proceedings, civil, and criminal, returnable to, and depending before, the said courts, at the respective times of holding the same, as heretofore established, shall be returned, and continued, in the same counties respectively, in the same manner as if the said causes, recognisances, pleas, and proceedings, had been regularly returned or continued, to the said respective times appointed by this act for holding the said courts.
Approved, April 29, 1824.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/18th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 39

Chap. XXXIX.—An Act supplementary to the act, entitled “An act supplementary to the act, entitled ‘An act for the relief of persons imprisoned for debt.’”
Act of Jan. 6, 1800, ch. 4. Act of Jan. 7, 1824, ch. 3. Persons commissioned under act of Jan. 6, 1800, to have full power, &c. to issue a citation directed to the creditor, agent, or attorney, &c.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the person or persons who shall or may be commissioned, either by any judge of the ​Supreme Court of the United States, or by any district judge of the United States, to administer the oath prescribed by the act, entitled “An act for the relief of persons imprisoned for debt,” passed on the sixth day of January, Anno Domini, one thousand eight hundred, shall, and may have full power and authority to issue a citation, directed to the creditor, his agent or attorney, if either lives within one hundred miles of the place of imprisonment, requiring him to appear at the time and place therein mentioned, if he see fit, to show cause why the said oath or affirmation should not be so administered.
The creditor, &c., if living within 50 miles, to give fifteen days’ previous notice.Sec. 2 And be it further enacted, That, if the creditor, his agent, or attorney, lives within fifty miles of the place of imprisonment, only fifteen days’ previous notice by citation shall be required.
Approved, April 22, 1824.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/18th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 44

Chap. XLIV.—An Act making appropriations for certain fortifications of the United States, for the year one thousand eight hundred and twenty-four.
Specific appropriations for certain fortifications.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the following sums be, and the same are hereby, appropriated, to wit; For fortifications, to each specifically, as follows:
For fort Jackson, at Plaquemine Turn, on the river Mississippi, one hundred and ten thousand dollars.
For the fort at Chef Menteur, one hundred thousand dollars.
For the fort at Mobile Point, one hundred and twenty-five thousand dollars.
Fort fort Monroe, ninety-five thousand dollars.
For fort Calhoun, ninety thousand dollars.
For topographical reconnoisance, repairs, and contingencies, twenty-six thousand dollars.
For the purchase of a site, and collecting materials for the projected work at New Utrecht Point, one of the works intended to defend the Narrows, in New York harbour, fifty thousand dollars.
For the purchase of a site, and collecting materials for the projected work at Brenton’s Point, Narraganset Bay, Rhode Island, fifty thousand dollars.
Approved, April 29, 1824.
# What Katy Did Next

Book 3 in the Katy series. It follows the stories What Katy Did (1872) and What Katy Did at School (1873) and tells the adventures of Katy Carr as she travels to Europe.
page
​ These girls were Clover and Elsie Carr.—Page 7.
page
What Katy Did Next.
BY
SUSAN COOLIDGE,
AUTHOR OF "WHAT KATY DID," "WHAT KATY DID AT SCHOOL," "A LITTLE COUNTRY GIRL," "THE NEW-YEAR'S BARGAIN," "MISCHIEF'S THANKSGIVING," "NINE LITTLE GOSLINGS," "EYEBRIGHT," "CROSS PATCH," "A ROUND DOZEN," "A GUERNSEY LILY."
With illustrations
By JESSIE McDERMOT.
BOSTON: ROBERTS BROTHERS. 1886.
page
Copyright, 1886, By Roberts Brothers.
University Press:
John Wilson and Son, Cambridge.
page
This Story is Dedicated
TO
THE MANY LITTLE GIRLS
(SOME OF THEM GROWN UP TO BE GREAT GIRLS NOW),
Who, during the last twelve years, have begged that something more might be told them about Katy Carr, and what she did after leaving school.
page
CONTENTS.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# What Katy Did Next/Adverts

SUSAN COOLIDGE'S POPULAR BOOKS.
ENTERING PARADISE.—Page 23. So in they marched, Katy and Cecy heading the procession, and Dorry, with his great trailing bunch of boughs, bringing up the rear.
ROBERTS BROTHERS, Publishers. Boston.
page
SUSAN COOLIDGE'S POPULAR BOOKS.
"Now, Katy, do, ah, do, do."—Page 108.
WHAT KATY DID AT SCHOOL.
WITH ILLUSTRATIONS BY MARY A. HALLOCK.
ROBERTS BROTHERS, Publishers. Boston.
page
SUSAN COOLIDGE'S POPULAR BOOKS.
Eyebright, who had grown as dear as a daughter to the old lady, was playing croquet with Charley.—Page 246
ROBERTS BROTHERS, Publishers. Boston.
page
SUSAN COOLIDGE'S POPULAR BOOKS.
The Cliffs.
A LITTLE COUNTRY GIRL.
With Illustrations.
One volume. Square 16mo. Cloth, black and gold. Price $1.50.
ROBERTS BROTHERS, Publishers. Boston.
# War and Love/A Moment's Interlude

Boston: The Four Seas Company, page 18
A MOMENT'S INTERLUDE
One night I wandered alone from my comrades' huts; The grasshoppers chirped softly In the warm misty evening; Bracken fronds beckoned from the darkness With exquisite frail green fingers; The tree gods muttered affectionately about me, And from the distance came the grumble of a kindly train.
I was so happy to be alone, So full of love for the great speechless earth, That I could have laid my cheek in the wet grasses And caressed with my lips the hard sinewy body Of Earth, the cherishing mistress of bitter lovers.
# War and Love

War and Love
By Richard Aldington
IMAGES—OLD AND NEW
WAR AND LOVE (1915-1918)
BY RICHARD ALDINGTON
Boston The Four Seas Company 1919
Copyright, 1919, by The Four Seas Company
The Four Seas Press Boston, Mass., U. S. A.
A few of these poems have appeared before in books and periodicals, as follows: Some Imagist Poets, 1917 (Houghton Mifflin Co., & Constable); New Paths, (1918) C. W. Beaumont, London); Reverie, 1917, (Privately printed, Cleveland, Ohio); The Dial; The Seven Arts; The Egoist.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1962, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 61 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. American Railway Express Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 425
United States v. American Railway Express Company
Argued: April 16, 17, 1924. --- Decided: June 2, 1924
The Attorney General and Mr. Blackburn Esterline, of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
Messrs. Robert C. Alston, of Atlanta, Ga., T. M. Cunningham, Jr., of Savannah, Ga., and H. S. Marx, of New York City, for appellees.
[Syllabus from page 426 intentionally omitted]
Mr. P. J. Farrell, of Washington, D. C., for appellant Interstate Commerce Commission.
Mrssrs. Sanders McDaniel, of Atlanta, Ga., and Charles J. Rixey, Jr., of Washington, D. C., for appellant Southeastern Express Co.
Mr. Challen B. Ellis, of Washington, D. C., for appellant Southern Traffic League.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. American Surety Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
322 U.S. 96
United States v. American Surety Company
Argued: March 27, 28, 1944. --- Decided: April 24, 1944
Mr. Robert L. Stern, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Homer Cummings, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. American Livestock Commission Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
279 U.S. 435
United States v. American Livestock Commission Company
Argued: March 5, 1929. --- Decided: May 20, 1929
Mr. W. D. Mitchell, Atty. Gen., for the United States.
Mr. C. E. Hall, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellees.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. American Sheet & Tin Plate Company

United States Supreme Court
301 U.S. 402
United States v. American Sheet & Tin Plate Company
Argued: April 9-12, 1937. --- Decided: May 17, 1937
Appeal from the District Court of the United Sates for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Daniel W. Knowlton, of Washington, D.C., for appellants.
Mr. David A. Reed, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee American Sheet and Tin Plate Co.
Mr. John S. Burchmore, of Chicago, Ill., for appellees Allegheny Steel Co. et al.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Weird Tales/Volume 12/Issue 5/The Creatures

8. The Creatures
# United States v. Louisiana (389 U.S. 155)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Stewart

## Dissenting Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 155
United States v. Louisiana (389 U.S. 155)
Argued: Oct. 9, 1967. --- Decided: Dec 4, 1967
See 389 U.S. 1059, 88 S.Ct. 757.
Louis F. Claiborne, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.
Victor A. Sachse, Baton Rouge, La., for defendant, State of Louisiana.
Houghton Brownlee, Jr., Austin, Tex., and Crawford C. Martin, Hillsboro, Tex., for defendant, State of Texas.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Louisiana (394 U.S. 836)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
394 U.S. 836
United States v. Louisiana (394 U.S. 836)
SUPPLEMENTAL DECREE
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Louisiana (395 U.S. 901)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
395 U.S. 901
UNITED STATES of America, plaintiff, v. State of LOUISIANA et al.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Louisiana (386 U.S. 979)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
386 U.S. 979
United States v. Louisiana (386 U.S. 979)

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Louisiana (395 U.S. 901)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
395 U.S. 901
UNITED STATES of America, plaintiff, v. State of LOUISIANA et al.
The LOUISIANA BOUNDARY CASE.
Pursuant to the opinion of this Court of March 3, 1969, 394 U.S. 11, 89 S.Ct. 773, 22 L.Ed.2d 44, it is ordered that Walter P. Armstrong, Jr., Esquire, of Memphis, Tennessee, be, and he is hereby, appointed as Special Master in this cause to make a preliminar determination consistent with the opinion of this Court. The Special Master shall have authority to fix the time and conditions of hearings which he may order and is authorized to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The Master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.
The Master shall be allowed his actual expenses and a reasonable compensation for his services to be approved hereafter by the Court. The allowances to him, the compensation paid to his technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants, and the cost of printing his report or reports shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court may hereafter approve.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this matter.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Louisiana (386 U.S. 979)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
386 U.S. 979
United States v. Louisiana (386 U.S. 979)
Solicitor General Marshall, Louis F. Claiborne, Roger P. Marquis and George S. Swarth, for the United States.
On consideration of the motion of the United States for entry of a supplemental decree declaring that the United States is entitled to certain submerged lands of the Gulf of Mexico and enjoining the State of Texas from interfering therewith, and for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to enjoin the State of Texas from leasing or otherwise interfering with said submerged lands pending determination of the title thereto; and
It appearing from said motion and attached affidavit that the State of Texas has announced its intention to offer said lands for mineral leasing on April 4, 1967, and that such leasing may violate this Court's injunction of December 12, 1960, and subject to unlawful exploitation mineral resources to which the United States makes claim under that decree.
(1) That within twenty days from the date hereof the State of Texas respond to the motion of the United States, and show cause why a preliminary injunction should not be issued as prayed for, pending final determination of the rights of the parties in the premises; and
(2) That the State of Texas be, and it is hereby, restrained from leasing or otherwise interfering with the submerged lands described in the motion of the United States, pending the ruling of the Court on the Motion of the United States for a preliminary injunction and the response of the State of Texas thereto.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice CLARK took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# What Will He Do With It? (Belford)/Book 11

* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
* Chapter VII
* Chapter VIII
* Chapter IX
* Chapter X
* Chapter XI
# White Nights and Other Stories/Notes from Underground

a short novel by Fyodor Dostoevsky written in 1864. It is considered one of the world's first and finest existentialist works. It presents itself as an excerpt from the rambling memoirs of a bitter, isolated, unnamed narrator (generally referred to by critics as Underground Man) who is a retired civil servant living in St. Petersburg.
Notes from Underground
A Novel
* Part 1
* Part 2
# White Nights and Other Stories/White Nights

White Nights is a short story originally published in Russian in 1848. It was translated by Garnett in 1918.
White Nights
A Sentimental Story from the Diary of a Dreamer
* First Night
* Second Night
* Nastenka's History
* Third Night
* Fourth Night
* Morning
# White Paper on Indian States (1950)/Part 9/Internal Customs Duties

Internal Customs Duties
192. The only States which now levy such duties are Hyderabad, Rajasthan, Madhya Bharat, Saurashtra and Vindhya Pradesh.
In regard to the first three, the Committee recommended varying periods, of three to five years, for the abolition of these duties and for their substitution by sales tax. In subsequent discussion with the representatives of these States, it was agreed that the period required would have to be 4 years in the case of Hyderabad and 5 years in Madhya Bharat and Rajasthan. These duties could doubtless be abolished even earlier, if the Centre could give some direct financial assistance; but present conditions render such a solution impracticable.
The Committee recommended the abolition of internal customs duties in Saurashtra and Vindhya Pradesh on 1st April 1950, and the grant of some small direct financial assistance to them by the Centre in that connection. Vindhya Pradesh agreed, but Saurashtra preferred gradual assistance; but present conditions render such a solution impracticable.
In no case will any "compensation" as such be payable.
# White Paper on Indian States (1950)/Part 9/Gradual Integration of Certain Departments

Gradual Integration of Certain Departments.
194. As regards Defence Forces, it was agreed as recommended by the Committee that only the "sanctioned" Indian State Forces would become a "federal" charge; the rest, commonly described as "irregulars" would continue to be the responsibility of the States subject to the general control of the Central Government and could be gradually liquidated by retrenchment or by absorption of suitable individuals into the "sanctioned" forces or into the police forces. The special administrative arrangements concerning the "sanctioned" forces which were recently concluded would, however, continue until other arrangements were made in due course for evolving a balanced Army in India as a whole including the States.
As regards the other "federal" departments, the following would be taken over on 1st April, 1950 (13th April 1950 in the case PEPSU) for direct administration by the Centre:
The question whether, in view of various administrative and other difficulties the remaining "federal" departments should not continue to be administered for some time through the States themselves as "Agents" of the Centre is under active consideration.