OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Pharsalus

From volume 11 of the work.
Titular see and suffragan of Larissa in Thessaly. The city is mentioned for the first time after the Persian war. In 445 B.C. it was unsuccessfully besieged by the Athenian Myronides (Thucyd., I, III), in 395 it was seized by Midias, tyrant of Larissa (Diodorus Siculus, XIV, 82), and it was finally forced to submit to Jason of Pheræ (Xenoph., "Hellen.", VI, 1, 2); in 191 the consul Acilius Glabrio made it over to Antiochus, King of Syria. It is specially famous for the victory of 9 August, 48 B.C., won by Cæsar from Pompey, after the latter had killed 15,000 men. At the time of Pliny (Hist. Nat., IV, 15) it was a free city. In the sixth century A.D. it was made a port of Thessaly ("Hieroclis Synecdemus"), ed. Burckhardt, 642, 13): in the time of Constantine Porphyrogenetus, it belonged to the theme of Macedonia (op. Cit., 50, 6). In 1881 it was ceded by Turkey with Thessaly to Greece. Of the three Greek bishops mentioned by Le Quien (Oriens christiansus, II, 116), it is doubtful if the first belonged to the see, but this list could easily be completed. At the beginning of the tenth century Pharsalus still remained suffragan of Larissa (Gelzar, "Ungedruckte . . . Texte der Notitiæ Episcopatuun", 557); about 970 (op. cit., 572) it became an autocephalous archbishopric; in 1300 it was elevated by Andronicus II to metropolitan dignity; at the close of the fifteenth century it was again suffragan of Larissa. Later it was united to the Diocese of Phanarion, and was suppressed only to be replaced (1900) by the Sees of Phanarus and Thessaliotides. Pharsala numbers 2500 inhabitants, of whom nearly half are Turks. The Greeks were defeated there in 1897.
LEAKE, Northern Greece, IV, 484; SMITH, Dict. Of Greek and Roman Geography, s.v.
S. VAILHÉ
# Characteristics of the Genius and Writings of L. E. L./Poetical Works

PART I.
POETICAL WORKS.
CONTENTS.
Part I. :
| | Page |
| Introductory Remarks | 7 |
| Notes.—Extract from Ethel Churchill | 12 |
| Conversational remarks on the Literary Character | 12 |
| Characteristics of Poetical Genius | 14 |
| Note—L. E. L.'s Appreciation of Genius and the Fine Arts | 17 |
| Peculiarities of L. E. L.'s Works: Their Style—Their Subject Matter—Their Effect | 20 |
| Analysis of L. E. L.'s Poetry | 31 |
| Remarks on the Moral Tendency of her Genius | 66 |
| Note—on Miss Landon's Personal Manner, and Style of her Conversation | 76 |
# Characteristics of the Genius and Writings of L. E. L./Printer

London: Printed by James and Luke J. Hansard, near Lincoln's-Inn Fields.
# Characteristics of the Genius and Writings of L. E. L./Prose Works

PART II.
PROSE WORKS.
———Fictions that contain Within their gilded caskets gems and gold, Right meanings, sound philosophy and truth.
CONTENTS.
Part II. :
| | Page |
| Uses of Fiction | 81 |
| General Characteristics of L. E. L.'s Prose Works | 88 |
| Resemblance to their style in her Conversation | 90 |
| Remarks on "Romance and Reality" | 91 |
| Extracts | 97 |
| Analysis of "Francesca Carrara" | 100 |
| Extracts | 113 |
| Remarks on "Ethel Churchill," with Extracts | 115 |
| Excursion with L. E. L., illustrative of "Ethel Churchill" | 136 |
| Objectionable Passages in Prose Works | 140 |
| L. E. L.'s Last Writings | 145 |
| Concluding Remarks: L. E. L.'s Knowledge of the World, and Representations of Human Life | 159 |
# Clarion Bank v. Jones Assignee

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
88 U.S. 325
Clarion Bank v. Jones Assignee

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Clark's Executors v. Van Riemsdyk

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
13 U.S. 153
Clark's Executors v. Van Riemsdyk

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Clarification on Release of Finder Goods Seized in China Square

2nd March 2023, Nairobi, Kenya.
We would like to clarify that the Anti-Counterfeit Authority (ACA) has released the goods that were seized at the China Square worth 50 million shillings. The goods were seized on 16th February 2023 following a complaint received from Smithmo Company Ltd, which suspected the sale of counterfeit Finder Tools within the premises.
However, we would like to inform the public that the complainant, in a letter dated 27th February, wrote to ACA and requested to withdraw the complaint against China Square. This request was made upon confirmation that the goods seized were sourced from the same manufacturer and international brand owner of Finder Merchandise. The complainant also requested for the release of the goods.
In light of this new information, ACA conducted a thorough investigation and verified the source of the goods, and we can confirm that they are authentic Finder Tools. As such, we have released the goods to the rightful owner.
We would like to urge members of the public to be vigilant when purchasing goods to avoid falling victim to counterfeit products. We also encourage them to report any suspected cases of counterfeit products to ACA to help protect their rights andinterests.
We thank the public for their cooperation in this matter, and we will continue towork tirelessly to protect consumers from counterfeit goods.
Dr. Robi Mbugua Njoroge, Ph.D Executive Director/CEO Anti-Counterfeit Authority(ACA)
# Clarimonde

English-language translations of Clarimonde include:
* Clarimonde (1900), by Lafcadio Hearn
* "Clarimonde" in Weird Tales, 11 (2) (February 1928), by Lafcadio Hearn
# Clark's Ferry Bridge Company v. Public Service Commission of Pennsylvania

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
291 U.S. 227
Clark's Ferry Bridge Company v. Public Service Commission of Pennsylvania
Argued: Jan. 18, 1934. --- Decided: Feb 5, 1934
Appeal from the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
[Syllabus from pages 228-230 intentionally omitted]
Mr. George Ross Hull, of Harrisburg, Pa., for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 228-231 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. E. Everett Mather, Jr., and John Fox Weiss, both of Harrisburg, Pa., for appellee.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Clark Executrix v. Wooster

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
119 U.S. 322
Clark Executrix v. Wooster
Fredk. P. Fish, for appellants, Clark, Ex'x, and others.
Frederic H. Betts, for appellee, Wooster.
BRADLEY, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Pontefract Priory

From volume 12 of the work.
Located in Yorkshire, England, a Cluniac monastery dedicated to St. John the Evangelist, founded about 1090 by Robert de Lacy, as a dependency of the Abbey of la Charité-sur-Loire, which supplied the first monks. Two charters of the founder are given in Dugdale. In a charter of Henry de Lacy, son of Robert, the church is spoken of as dedicated to St. Mary and St. John. These donations were finally confirmed to the monastery by a Bull of Pope Celestine (whether II or III is uncertain), which also conferred certain ecclesiastical privileges on the priory. In the Visitation Records it had sixteen monks in 1262, and twenty-seven in 1279. At the latter date a prior of exceptional ability was in charge of the house, and he is commended for his zeal during the twelve years of his rule, which had resulted in a reduction of the monastery's debts from 3200 marks to 350. A later, undated, visitation return gives the average number of monks at twenty. Duckett prints a letter from Stephen, Prior of Pontefract in 1323, to Pierre, Abbot of Cluny, explaining that he had been prevented from making a visitation of the English Cluniac houses, owing to the presence of the king and court at Pontefract, which prevented his leaving home. In the previous year (1322) Thomas, Earl of Lancaster had been beheaded at Pontefract, and his body buried in the priory church "on the right hand of the high altar". Rumour declared that miracles had been wrought at the tomb. This attempt to regard the earl as a martyr aroused the anger of Edward II, who impounded the offerings (Rymer, Foedera, II, ii, 726). However, not long after, a chantry dedicated to St. Thomas was built on the site of the execution and, in 1343, license was given to the prior and Convent of Pontefract "to allow Masses and other Divine Services" to be celebrated there.
In the valor ecclesiasticus of 26 Henry VIII, the yearly revenue of the priory is entered as £472 16s. 10½d. gross, and £337 14s. 8½d. clear value. The last prior, James Thwayts, with seven brethren and one novice surrendered the monastery to the king, 23 November, 1540, the prior being assigned a pension of fifty pounds per annum. The Church and buildings have been completely destroyed, but the site is still indicated by the name of Monk-hill.
DUGDALE, Monasticon Anglicanum, V (London, 1846), 118-31; DUCKETT Charters and Records . . . of the Abbey of Cluni (privately printed, 1888), passim, esp. II, 150-54; IDEM, Record Evidences . . . of the Abbey of Cluni (privately printed, 1886); IDEM, Visitations of English Cluniac Foundations (London, 1890); BOOTHROYD, History of Pontefract (Pontefract, 1807); FOX, History of Pontefract (Pontefract, 1827).
G. ROGER HUDLESTON.
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Pompeiopolis

From volume 12 of the work.
A titular see in Paphlagonia. The ancient name of the town is unknown; it may have been Eupatoria which Pliny (VI, ii, 3), followed by Le Quien and Battandier, wrongly identifies with the Eupatoria of Mithridates. The latter was called Magnopolis by Pompey. Pompeiopolis was, with Andrapa-Neapolis, in 64 B. C. included by Pompey in the Province of Pontus, but the annexation was premature, as the town (which ranked as a metropolis) was restored to vassal princes of eastern Paphlagonia and definitively annexed to the Roman Empire in 6 B. C. Strabo (XIII, iii, 48) says that in the neighbourhood was a mine of realgar or sulphuret of arsenic, which was worked by criminals. As early as the middle of the seventh century the "Ecthesis" of Pseudo-Epiphanius (ed. Gelzer, 535) ranks it as an autocephalous archdiocese, which title it probably received when Justinian (Novellæ, xxix) reorganized the province of Paphlagonia. In the eleventh century Pompeiopolis became a metropolitan see (Parthey, "Hieroclis Synecdemus", 97) and it was still such in the fourteenth century (Gelzer, "Ungedruckte-Texte der Notitiæ episcopatuum", 608). Shortly afterwards the diocese was suppressed. Le Quien (Oriens christ., I, 557-60) mentions fourteen titulars of this diocese the last of whom, Gregory, lived about 1350. Amon them were Philadelphus, at the Council of Nicæa (325); Sophronius, at that of Seleucia; Arginus, at Ephesus (431); Ætherius, at Chalcedon (451); Severus, Constantinople (553); Theodore, Constantinople (680-1); Maurianus, Nicæa (787); and John, Constantinople (869). Pompeiopolis is now called Tach-Keupru (bridge of stone), because of an ancient bridge over the Tatai-Tchai or Gueul-Irmak, the ancient Ammias, and is in the sandjak and vilayet of Kastamouni twenty-five miles north-east of that town. It has about 7000 inhabitants, of whom 700 are Christians, the majority Armenian schismatics.
RAMSAY, Geography of Asia Minor (London, 1890), 192, 318; ANDERSON, Studia Pontica (Brussels, 1903), 93; CUINET, La Turquie d'Asie, IV (Paris, 1894), 484-7.
S. VAILHÉ.
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Pontifical Indult

From volume 7 of the work.
(Lat. Indultum, found in Roman Law, bk. I, Cod. Theodos. 3, 10. and 4, 15: V, 15, 2; concession, privilege). Indults are general faculties (q.v.), granted by the Holy See to bishops and others, of doing something not permitted by the common law. General needs, peculiar local conditions, the impossibility of applying to Rome in individual cases, etc., are sufficient reasons for making these concessions. They are granted for a definite term, three, five, ten years, or for a specific number of cases; they are ordinary or extraordinary, contained in certain formula, and are of the nature of privileges or quasi-privileges. Indults are personal in so much as they must be used by the bishop himself (or his vicar-general), unless he be allowed to communicate them to others. Permission to communicate indults is conceded in some formulae, denied in others, while in others it is granted conditionally. The one to whom these faculties are communicated is the agent or commissary of the ordinary rather than his delegate. Indults are communicated as they are received; are possessed and exercised not in the name of the one communicating them, but in the name of him to whom they have been communicated: consequently they do not cease with the death or loss of jurisdiction of the ordinary through whom they were communicated. Faculties that are subdelegated may be restricted in regard to persons, number of cases, etc, and are exercised not in one's own name, but in the name of another: the power of the subdelegate ceases on the death of the delegate.
It is to be noted moreover that the word indult, employed in a less restricted sense, is synonymous with privilege, grace, favor, concession, etc. (Decretals, L. V, tit. 33, c. 17, 19, tit. 40, c. 21; Cone. Trid., VI, c. 2, De Ref.). Hence we speak of the Lenten indult, an indult of secularization granted to a religious, an indult to absent oneself from the recitation of the Divine Office in choir, an indult permitting the celebration of Mass at sea, the indult of a private oratory, a privileged altar, and so on. An induIt or privilege differs from a dispensation, since the former grants a permanent (not necessarily perpetual) concession, while the latter is given for a particular case, outside which the obligation of observing the law remains. (See FACULTIES, CANONICAL.)
ANDREW B. MEEHAN
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Pompeo Marchesi

From volume 9 of the work.
A Lombard sculptor of the neoclassic school, born at Saltrio, near Milan, 7 August, 1790; died at Milan, 6 February. 1858. He studied in Rome under Canova and received much encouragement from his master. The greater part of his life was spent in Milan, where for many years he was professor of sculpture at the Academy. He executed a great number of groups in marble and portrait busts. One of his earliest works was a colossal statue of St. Ambrose, patron of the city; for the Arco della Pace (Simplon commemorative arch), completed 1838, he made the reliefs of Terpsichore and Venus Urania. He decorated the façade of the Castello with twelve figures of great Italian captains, and that of the Palazzo Saporiti with reliefs in modern classic style. One of his best-known compositions is the group of the "Mater Dolorosa", in the church of San Carlo, at which he laboured many years. Works outside of Milan are the colossal statue of Charles Emmanuel III at Novara; that of Philibert Emanuel of Savoy at Turin; the sitting figure of Goethe for the library at Frankfort; two statues of the Emperor Francis I of Austria, one made with the assistance of Manfredoni, for Goritz, and another, unassisted, for the Hofburg at Vienna. He also executed the monument to Volta at Como; the monument of the singer Malibran; others to Beccaria and Bellini and a bust of Professor Zuccala for the Atheneum of Bergamo.
BOCCARDO, Nuova Enciclopedia Italiana, XIII (Turin, 1882); BAEDEKER, Guide Book for Italy (New York, 1904).
M. L. Handley.
# City of Richmond v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
174 U.S. 761
City of Richmond v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company
C. V. Meredith and H. R. Pollard, for appellant.
Hill Carter, A. L. Holladay, and George H. Fearons, for appellee.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# City of Richmond v. Bird Ainslie Carriage Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
249 U.S. 174
City of Richmond v. Bird Ainslie Carriage Company
Argued: Jan. 28 and 29, 1919. --- Decided: March 3, 1919
Mr. George Wayne Anderson, of Richmond, Va., for petitioner.
Mr. James E. Cannon, of Richmond, Va., for respondents.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# City of Quincy v. Cooke

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
107 U.S. 549
City of Quincy v. Cooke
Carl E. Epler, for plaintiff in error.
Wm. McFadon, for defendant in error.
HARLAN, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Church of Scientology International v. Time Warner, Inc., et al./Supreme Court Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing - The Article

Supreme Court Opinion: 534 U.S. 814, 122 S.Ct. (2001)
Supreme Court of the United States.
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, Petitioner,
v.
TIME WARNER, INC., Time Inc. Magazine Company and Richard Behar, Respondents.
No. 00-1683.
2001.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
The Article: "Scientology: the Cult of Greed," Time Magazine, May 6, 1991,
Pages 50-57
Floyd Abrams [FN*], Dean Ringel, Janet A. Beer, Cahill Gordon & Reindel, 80 Pine Street, New York, New York 10005, (212) 701-3000, Attorneys for Respondents. Of Counsel: Robin Bierstedt, Time Inc., 1271 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10020.
FN* Counsel of Record
The Article: "Scientology: The Cult of Greed," Time Magazine, May 6, 1991, pages 50-57 Reproduced in the pages that follow is the Addendum to the Brief of Appellees Time Warner Inc., Time Inc. Magazine Company and Richard Behar, filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on August 30, 1999.
As described in Respondents' Brief below, the Addendum is a photocopy of the cover article of the May 6, 1991 issue of Time Magazine (the "Article"), with the passages challenged in this lawsuit highlighted and numbered to correspond to the paragraphs in Petitioner's complaint. The Article is also reproduced at various points in the Joint Appendix filed below, e.g., A336-45. In Respondents' Brief in Opposition references to the Article reproduced herein are in the form "Article __" and cite to the magazine page number(s) 50- 57.---
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Church of Scientology International v. Time Warner, Inc., et al./Supreme Court Certiorari

United States Reports, Volume 534., Cases Adjudged in The Supreme Court, Pg. 814. (2001) see The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power (Wikipedia)
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
534 U.S. 814
Church of Scientology International v. Time Warner, Inc., et al.
No. 00-1683. Decided: October 1, 2001
No. 00–1683. Church of Scientology International v. Time Warner, Inc., et al. C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 238 F. 3d 168.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Church of Scientology International v. Time Warner, Inc., et al.

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States, Scientology.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons gallery, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court, Docket for 00-1683 (2001) online

## Court cases
### United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

* Church of Scientology Intern. v. Time Warner, Inc.
** 806 F.Supp. 1157
** 903 F.Supp. 637
** 932 F.Supp. 589
** 1997 WL 538912
** 1998 WL 575194
** Church of Scientology International v. Time Warner, Inc., et al./92 Civ. 3024 (PKL), 11-14-95 , , ,

### United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

* Church of Scientology v. Behar/Opinion, 238 F. 3d 168 (2nd Cir. 2001)
** 1999 WL 33629945 (Appellate Brief) Reply Brief for Appellant (Oct. 01, 1999)
** 1999 WL 33629946 (Appellate Brief) Brief of Appellees Time Warner Inc., Time Inc. Magazine Company and Richard Behar (Aug. 01, 1999)
** 1999 WL 33629947 (Appellate Brief) Brief for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant Church of Scientology International (Jun. 30, 1999)
** 99-7332 (Docket) (Mar. 30, 1999)
** 98-9522 (Docket) (Nov. 18, 1998)

### Supreme Court of the United States

* Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing - The Article: "Scientology: The Cult of Greed," Time Magazine, May 6, 1991, Pages 50-57. (January 1, 2001)
* Petition for Writ of Certiorari (May 8, 2001)
* Docket, Supreme Court of the United States (May 8, 2001)
* Reply to Respondents' Brief in Opposition (June 24, 2001)
* Respondents' Brief in Opposition (July 9, 2001)
* Order Denying Petition for Writ of Certiorari (October 1, 2001)
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse

## External links

* Full text at Time Magazine Website - 'The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power', Richard Behar, Time magazine (May 6, 1991)
* Full Text, with Images, David Touretzsky, Website
* Full Text of article, at the Rick Ross Institute
* Scientology - A Dangerous Cult Goes Mainstream, shortened Reader's Digest version of the article, full-text
* Church of Scientology International v. Time Warner Inc., First Amendment Center
* U.S. district court opinion and order, dismissing most of Church of Scientology libel suit against Time magazine.

## See also

* Schwarz v. National Security Agency
* United States of America v. Jane Kember, Morris Budlong, Sentencing Memorandum