OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Lizalis’ idinga lakho

Lizalis’ idinga lakho, (Fullfil/realise your promise) Thixo Nkosi yenyaniso! (Faithful/Truthful God) Zonk’ iintlanga, zonk’ izizwe, (All races, all nations,) Ma zizuze usindiso. (must be saved)
Amadolo kweli lizwe, (All knees in this world) Ma kagobe phambi kwakho; (Must bow before you) Zide zithi zonk’ iilwimi, (So that all tongues) Ziluxel’ udumo lwakho. (Proclaim your glory)
Law’la, law’la, Nkosi, Yesu! (Govern/Prevail our God) Koza ngawe ukonwaba; (Happiness can only come through you) Ngeziphithi-phithi zethu, (Because of our struggles/challenges) Yonakele imihlaba. (The world is damaged)
Bona izwe lakowethu, (Look at our world) uxolel’ izoono zalo; (Forgive our sins) Ungathob’ ingqumbo yakho, (Do not send your wrath) Luze luf’ usapho lwalo. (To kill the children)
Yaala, Nkosi, singadeli (Prohibit us God from disobeying) Iimfundiso zezwi lakho; (The teachings of your Word) Uze usivuselele, (Revive us) Sive inyaniso yakho. (We can hear your Truth”)
# Lloyd Fry Roofing Company v. Wood

Supreme Court of the United States
344 U.S. 157
LLOYD A. FRY ROOFING CO. v. WOOD ET AL., MEMBERS OF THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas
No. 37. Argued: Nov. 10, 1952 --- Decided: Dec. 8, 1952

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
Petitioner manufactures in Tennessee products which it sends in trucks to customers in nearby states. Finding that driver-owners carrying those products in Arkansas, who allegedly had leased their vehicles to petitioner, were in reality transporting petitioner's goods as "contract carriers" for which a state Act required a permit, the State Supreme Court dismissed petitioner's bill praying that enforcement of the Act be enjoined. Neither petitioner nor the drivers had obtained any kind of authority from the Interstate Commerce Commission. Held:
1. The finding of the State Supreme Court that the driver-owners were in reality transporting petitioners goods as contract carriers is not without factual foundation and is accepted by this, Court. Pp. 159–160.
2. The State's requirement of a permit in such circumstances is not an undue, burden on interstate commerce, and does not conflict with the Commerce Clause of the Federal Constitution. nor with the Federal Motor Carrier Act. Pp. 161–163.
3. Buck v. Kuykendall, 267 U.S. 307, distinguished. Pp. 161–162.
4. It is unnecessary here to consider apprehended burdensome conditions which the State has not attempted to enforce. Pp. 162–163.
5. The State is not without power to require interstate motor carriers to identify themselves as users of the State's highways. P. 163.
219 Ark. 553, 244 S.W.2d 147, affirmed.
In an action brought by petitioner in an Arkansas state court to enjoin enforcement of the Arkansas Motor Carrier Act, the State Supreme Court ordered dismissal of the bill. 219 Ark. 553, 244 S.W.2d 147. This Court granted certiorari. 343 U.S. 962. Affirmed, p. 163.
[p158] Glenn M. Elliott argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was James W. Wrape.
John R. Thompson and Eugene R. Warren submitted on brief for respondents.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Magnet Cove Barium Corp. v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
361 U.S. 32
Magnet Cove Barium Corp. v. United States
Mr. Frank A. Leffingwell, for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Messrs. Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and Francis A. Silver, for the United States and Interstate Commerce Commission.
Mr. Eldon Martin, for appellees Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. and others.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Magnificat (Church of the Visitation)

Inscription at the Church of the Visitation
My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my savior; because he has regarded the lowliness of His handmaid; for behold, henceforth all generations shall call me blessed; because he who is mighty has done great things for me, and holy is his name; and for generation upon generation is his mercy, to those who fear Him. He has shown might with his arm, he has scattered the proud in the conceit of their heart. He has put down the mighty from their thrones, and has exalted the lowly. He has filled the hungry with good things, and the rich he has sent empty away. He has given help to Israel, his servant, mindful of his mercy—even as he spoke to our fathers—to Abraham and to his posterity forever.
# Magniac v. Thomson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
32 U.S. 348
Magniac v. Thomson

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Magnesium Casting Company v. National Labor Relations Board

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
401 U.S. 137
Magnesium Casting Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
No. 370. Argued: January 18-19, 1971 --- Decided: February 23, 1971
Following a unit determination hearing, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) regional director concluded that three individuals were employees rather than supervisors and thus includible in the proposed bargaining unit at petitioner company's plant. The NLRB denied petitioner's request for review. Following an election, the regional director certified the union as the exclusive bargaining representative. Subsequently, the NLRB upheld a finding that petitioner's refusal to bargain constituted an unfair labor practice. Petitioner moved for reconsideration on the ground that the NLRB was required to give plenary review to the regional director's representation determination before issuing an unfair labor practice order based on that determination. The motion was denied and the Court of Appeals enforced the NLRB's order.
Held: Under § 3 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act the NLRB is permitted to delegate to the regional director its authority to determine the appropriate bargaining unit, and plenary review by the NLRB of such determination is not mandatory. Pp. 141-143.
427 F. 2d 114, affirmed.
DOUGLAS, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Louis Chandler argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Jerome H. Somers.
Norton J. Come argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Wm. Terry Bray, Arnold Ordman, and Dominick L. Manoli.
Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed by Jerry Kronenberg and Alan Raywid for the Terminal Freight Cooperative Association, and by William L. Dennis for Olson Bodies, Inc.
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by Bernard Kleiman, Elliot Bredhoff, Michael H. Gottesman, and George H. Cohen for the United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, and by Benjamin Rubenstein for International Union, U.A.W.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Magnificat

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Magnificat."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Magnificat", a passage from the Gospel of Luke, 1st century.
* "Magnificat", a poem by Alfred Gurney, 1884.

## See also

* "The May Magnificat" by Gerard Manley Hopkins
# Magniac Company v. Thomson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
56 U.S. 281
Magniac Company v. Thomson
THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting as a court of equity.
Magniac & Company, being English subjects, had two judgments against Thomson, one in the Circuit Court of the United States for Pennsylvania, in 1827, and the other in the Circuit Court for New Jersey, in 1829.
On the 1st April, 1829, the appellants sued out a writ of capias ad satisfaciendum on the judgment in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to April session, 1829, to which the marshal, on the 8th April, 1830, returned non est inventus, and on the same day an alias capias ad satisfaciendum was sued out to April session, 1830, Number 9, to which on the 12th April, 1830, the marshal made return of 'C. C. and enlarged by agreement of plaintiff's attorney.'
The appellee was discharged out of custody by the consent of the plaintiffs in the judgment, under the following agreement, viz.
Magniac v. Thomson. No. 18, Circuit Court of the United States, Pennsylvania District, October, 1826.
Defendant having been taken by ca. sa. in this suit, at his instance it is agreed that he be set at liberty on giving security to abide the event of an issue to be formed for ascertaining, by judicial decision, whether he has the means, by the property in his marriage settlement or otherwise, of satisfying the judgment, which issue is to be formed by plaintiff's affirmance and defendant's denial of such means; both parties hereby consenting to try such issue at the ensuing session of the Circuit Court of the United States for this district, on the merits, without regard to form or to the time when the jury may be summoned; it being expressly acknowledged by defendant that this agreement is made for his accommodation, without any prejudice whatever to arise to the plaintiff's rights by the defendant's enlargement on security as aforesaid or otherwise howsoever.
April 8th, 1830.
JOHN R. THOMSON.
I hereby become answerable for the performance of the terms above stated, which I guarantee.
R. F. STOCKTON.
Witness, J. P. Norris, Jr.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Magnet Cove Barium Corp. v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
361 U.S. 32
Magnet Cove Barium Corp. v. United States
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bothamley, Moses Nathaniel

​Bothamley, Moses Nathaniel, undergrad. Christ Church, Oxon, changed the spelling of his name, a student of the Inner Temple 30 April, 1878 (then aged 21), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1881 (eldest son of Samuel Bottomley, gentleman, of Shelf Hall, Halifax, Yorkshire); born , 1857.
    Shelf Hall, Halifax.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bottrill, William Evans

​Bottrill, William Evans, equity draftsman and conveyancer, a student of the Middle Temple 17 Nov., 1879, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1883 (eldest son of William Bottrill, of Belair, South Australia); born , .
    1, Stone Buildings, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Boulnois, Charles

​Boulnois, Charles, LL.B. (honours). King's Coll., London, 1854, and a member of Convocation, goes the South-eastern circuit, late judge of chief court of the Punjab 186-, a student of the Middle Temple 7 Nov., 1851, called to the bar 30 April, 1855, son of William Boulnois, Esq., of London); born , ; married 21 July, 1864, Emmeline Barker, eldest dau. of Joseph Goodeve, Esq., bar.-at-law.
    19, Russell Road, W.; 1. Temple Gardens, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Boulter, Stanley Carr

​Boulter, Stanley Carr, goes the South-eastern circuit, undergrad. Clare Coll. Camb., a student of the Inner Temple 9 Nov. 1874 (then aged 21), called to the bar 27 Jan., 1879 (only surviving son of John Boulter, Esq., of Frimley, Surrey, dec.); born 1853 and has issue.
    5, Norfolk Terrace, Bayswater; 12, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bourchier, Amaury Robert Macnamara

​Bourchier, Amaury Robert Macnamara, M.A. (late junior student) Christ Church, Oxon, assistant registrar Lancaster Chancery Court since 1883, a student of Lincoln's Inn 24 Jan., 1876 (then aged 26), called to the bar 9 June, 1880 (only son of James Macnamara Bourchier, of Rathglasse, co. Galway, gentleman); born , 1850.
    Chancery Office, Manchester.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Boughey, William Fenton Fletcher

​Boughey, William Fenton Fletcher, M.A., Christ Church, Oxon, 183S, stipendiary magistrate for Wolverhampton since 1879, recorder of Shrewsbury 1867-79, educated at Shrewsbury Grammar School, a student of Lincoln's Inn 14 Nov., 1835 (then aged 21), called to the bar there 11 June, 1839, admitted a barrister of the Middle Temple ad eundem 4 June, 1845 (4th son of John Fenton Boughey, Bart., of Aqualate, co. Stafford); born 9 Nov., 1814; married 30 April, 1874, Caroline, dau. of late Rev. Benjamin Lucas Cubitt, rector of Catfield, Norfolk, and has issue (see Foster's Baronetage).
    Wolverhampton; Oxford and Cambridge Club.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Boucherat, Louis Arthur

​Boucherat, Louis Arthur, a member of the French bar, a student of the Middle Temple 15 April, 1869, called to the bar there 6 June, 1871 (younger son of late Julius Boucherat, of Mauritius); born , .
    Mauritius.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bourdillon, Charles Martin Webb

​Bourdillon, Charles Martin Webb, undergrad. Christ Church, Oxon, a student of the Inner Temple 20 April, 1835 (then aged 22), called to the bar 8 June, 1838 (2nd son of Brownlow Bourdillon, Esq., of Ramsgate, Kent); born , 1813.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bourdillon, Thomas

​Bourdillon, Thomas, J.P. Essex, a student of Lincoln's Inn 20 Aug., 1825 (then aged 20), called to the bar 8 June, 1832 (eldest son of Rev. Thomas Bourdillon, of Hunstanton, Hunts, clerk); born , 1805; married 17 Oct., 1871, Selina, 4th dau. of late John Carbonell, Esq.
    Horkesley Hall, Colchester.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Boult, Swinton Henry

​Boult, Swinton Henry, M.A. London Univ. 1856 (honours) and a member of Convocation, practises in the Lancaster Chancery Court, assistant magistrate and collector B.C.S. 1856-9, a student of Lincoln's Inn 24 Nov., 1860 (then aged 25), called to the bar 6 June, 1863 (eldest son of Swinton Boult, of Liverpool, actuary); born 27 May, 1835.
    6, Stanley Street, Liverpool.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bowles, Thomas John

​Bowles, Thomas John, B.A. Christ Church, Oxon, goes the Oxford circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 29 Jan., 1876 (then aged 23), called to the bar 7 May, 1879 (eldest son of John Samuel Bowles, Esq., of Milton Hall, Milton, Berks); born , 1853.
    Milton Hall, Steventon, Berks; 65, St. George's Road, S.W; 4, Middle Temple Lane, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bowman, Andrew

​Bowman, Andrew, LL.B. London Univ. 1869, M.A. Sydney Univ., a student of the Middle Temple 28 Oct., 1864, called to the bar 11 June, 1867 (a younger son of George Bowman, Esq., of Richmond, co. Cumberland, New South Wales); born , .
    Sydney, Australia.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bowman, Edward Richmond

​Bowman, Edward Richmond, LL.B. London Univ. 1869, M.A. Sydney Univ., a student of the Middle Temple 28 Oct., 1864, called to the bar 11 June, 1867 (a younger son of George Bowman, Esq., of Richmond, co. Cumberland, New South Wales); born .
    Sydney, Australia.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bower, Francis Alan

​Bower, Francis Alan, M.A. Trin. Coll., Camb., equity draftsman and conveyancer, a student of Lincoln's Inn 27 June, 1876 (then aged 22), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1880 (only son of Frederick Bower, Esq., of West Dean House, Chichester); born 29 Aug., 1853.
    West Dean Park, Chichester; 26, Old Square, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bower, George Spencer

​Bower, George Spencer, B.A. New Coll., Oxon, from Winchester Coll., Gaisford Greek prose prize 1876, chancellor's English essay prize 1878, etc., author of Hartley and James Mill and The Law relating to Electric Lighting, a member of the Midland circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 26 Jan., 1876 (then aged 21), called to the bar 9 June, 1880 (2nd son of George Bower, of St. Neots, Hunts); born 12 Oct., 1854.
    The Shrubbery, St. Neots, Hunts; 8, King's Bench Walk, Temple, K.C.; Savage Club; Junior Oxford and Cambridge Club.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bowlby, Edward Salvin

​Bowlby, Edward Salvin, M.A., St. John's Coll., Camb., 1857, a student of the Inner Temple 1 Nov., 1854 (then aged 24), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1857 (eldest son of Rev. Edward Bowlby, of Little Thurrock, Essex); born , 1830; married 1st, 1 Aug., 1861, Maria, youngest dau. of late James Rimington, Esq., of Broomhead Hall, Yorks; he married 2ndly, 10 June, 18S0, Elizabeth, eldest dau. of Robert Vans-Agnew, Esq., of Sheuchan and Barnbarroch, Argyllshire, and has issue.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bowles, Henry Ferryman

​Bowles, Henry Ferryman, B.A. Jesus Coll., Camb., a student of the Inner Temple 15 Nov., 1878 (then aged 19), called to the bar 6 June, 1883 (eldest son of Henry Carrington Bowles Bowles, J.P., of Myddelton House, Enfield, Middlesex); born , 1859.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bower, Herbert Morris

​Bower, Herbert Morris, M.A. Trin. Coll., Camb., goes the South-eastern circuit, astudent of the Middle Temple 6 Nov., 1880, called to the bar 6 June, 1883 (eldest son of Abraham Bower, Esq., J.P., of Elmcrofts, Ripon, Yorkshire); born , .
    3, Paper Buildings, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bowles, William Henry

​Bowles, William Henry, conveyancer and equity draftsman, a student of Lincoln's Inn 15 Jan., 1875 (then aged 21), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1877 (4th son of Rev. Charles Bradshaw Bowles, of Tunbridge Wells, Kent); born 16 July, 1853.
    t8, Duke Street, Manchester Square, W.; 26, Old Square, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.; Windham Club.
# Lorelei's Song

Published in Doggerel and other doggerel (2015).
If there's reason, I can't recall it, Why I feel sick and tense. A fable demands I tell it, An old tale without sense.
The heavens are cool and dark now And quiet flows the Rhine; The peak of the Rock is a spark now Of summer eveningshine.
In glory amid the last light There sits a maid most fair. Her garment and jewels shine bright As she combs her golden hair
With a golden comb; and she's singing The most marvellous song to me. Even piercing my drums could not bring Escape from that melody.
In my skiff I am a captive Of each melodious note, Caring nothing for the rapids That wait to sink my boat.
The waves will be devouring, Too soon, both skiff and I; And I will die still hearing The song of Lorelei.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Lorem ipsum

In publishing and graphic design, lorem ipsum is a filler text commonly used to demonstrate the graphic elements of a document or visual presentation. The lorem ipsum text is typically a scrambled section of De finibus bonorum et malorum, a 1st-century BC Latin text by Cicero, with words altered, added, and removed to make it nonsensical, improper Latin.
Its use as a filler text was introduced in the 1950s in the form of Letraset typeface specimens, one of which is reproduced here.
Letraset/Body Type
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisci tempor incidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua veniam, quis nostrund exercitation ullamcorpor s commodo consequat. Duis autem vel eum irrure esse molestiae consequat, vel illum dolore eu fugi et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptat exceptur sint occaecat cupiditat non provident, deserunt mollit anim id est laborum et dolor fuga distinct. Nam liber tempor cum soluta nobis elige quod maxim placeat facer possim omnis volupt
Lorem ipsum dolor si amet, consectetur adipiscing incidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquam erat nostrud exercitation ullamcorper suscipit laboris nis duis autem vel eum irure dolor in reprehenderit i, dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. At vero eos et accusa praesant luptatum delenit aigue duos dolor et mole provident, simil tempor sunt in culpa qui officia de fuga. Et harumd dereud facilis est er expedit disti eligend optio congue nihil impedit doming id quod assumenda est, omnis dolor repellend. Temporibud
Lorem ipsum dolor si amet, consectetur adipiscing incidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquam erat nostrud exercitation ullamcorper suscipit laboris nis duis autem vel eum irure dolor in reprehenderit i dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. At vero eos et accus praesant luptatum delenit aigue duos dolor et mol provident, simil tempor sunt in culpa qui officia de fuga. Et harumd dereud facilis est er expedit disti eligend oprio congue nihil impedit doming id quod assumenda est, omnis dolor repellend. Temporibud LETRASET PATENTED PRINTED IN ENGLAND PM 169
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) between 1929 and 1977 (inclusive) without a copyright notice.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Dansey, Richard Ingram

​Dansey, Richard Ingram, B.A., Queen's Coll., Oxon, 1865, a member of the Oxford circuit, Local Government Board inspector since 1872, J.P. co. Heref, a student of the Middle Temple 17 April, 1868, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1871 (eldest son of Richard Dansey, Esq., of Epinal, France); born 21 March, 1845; married 10 Aug., 1871, Milburgha Price, 4th dau. of Sir Richard Green-Price, Bart, M.P., of Norton, co. Radnor, and has issue (see Foster's Baronetage).
    The Sheet, Ludlow, Salop.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Daniel, William Thomas Shave

​Daniel, William Thomas Shave, Q.C., county court judge (circuit No. 11) March, 1867, till 12 April, 1884, joint judge at Leeds for the trial of equity and bankruptcy cases 1875, recorder of Ipswich 1842–8, author of History and Origin of Law Reports, vice-chairman (originator) of the system of the law reports of the Council of Law Reporting 1865–70 member of the Law Digest Commission 1868, contested Tamworth 1859 and 1865, a student of Lincoln's Inn 27 Jan., 1825 (then aged 19), called to the bar 8 Feb., 1830, Q.C. 17 July, 1851, called to the bench 3 Nov., 1851 (eldest son of William Daniel, of Stapenhill, co. Derby); born 17 March, 1806; married 1st, 12 Sept., 1830, Harriet, eldest dau. of John Mayon, Esq., of Coleshill; she died 1838; he married 2ndly, 11 April, 1840, Sarah, only dau. of late Rev. Arthur William Trollope, D.D., head master Christ's Hospital (see Foster's Peerage, B. Kesteven).
    51, Parade, Leamington.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Daniell, William

​Daniell, William, B.A., Corpus Christi Coll., Oxon, 1877, goes the Oxford circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 27 Oct., 1877 (then aged 23), called to the bar 9 June, 1880 (2nd surviving son of late William Daniell, Esq., of Bryderwen, Newrport, Mon.); born , 1854.
    Bryderwen, Newport, Mon.; 1, Temple Gardens, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Daniels, George St. Leger

​Daniels, George St. Leger, LL.B. London Univ. 1876, a student of the Middle Temple 2 Nov., 1871, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1875 (eldest son of Nathaniel Daniels, of London); born 24 Oct., 1850.
    5, Essex Court, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Daniel, Thomas William

​Daniel, Thomas William, M.A., Corpus Christi Coll., Camb., 1856, J.P. Norfolk, a student of Lincoln's Inn 18 Nov., 1851, went to the Inner Temple 12 Nov., 1853 (aged 28), where he was called to the bar 30 April, 1855 (only son of Knights Francis Daniel, Esq., of Stokesby Filby, Norfolk); born , 1826.
    Thrigby Hall, Great Yarmouth.