OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Hymn: "Oh, none in all the world before"

Sung at Christmas by the scholars of St. Helena's Island, S. C.
* "Hymn" in In War Time, and Other Poems (1863)
* quoted in The Freedmen at Port Royal from Atlantic Monthly in September, 1863, Pages 291-315
* "Hymn sung at St Helena’s Island" in The Riverside song book (1893)
* “Hymn sung at Christmas by the Scholars of St. Helena’s Island, S. C.,” in The Complete Poetical Works of John Greenleaf Whittier (1895)
# Hygrade Provision Company v. Sherman Lewis & Fox Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
266 U.S. 497
Hygrade Provision Company v. Sherman Lewis & Fox Company
Argued: Nov. 20 and 21, 1924. --- Decided: Jan 5, 1925
Mr. David L. Podell, of New York City, for appellants.
Messrs. S. H. Hofstadter and Felix C. Benvenga, both of New York City, for appellees.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hymn (Dock)

English-language translations of Hymn (Dock) include:
* Hymn (Dock, tr. Pennypacker)
* Hymns with Translation translated by Martin G. Brumbaugh
# Hylas

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Hylas."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Hylas", a poem by Florence Earle Coates
* "Hylas", a poem by Olive Custance
* "Hylas", a poem by Edmund Clarence Stedman

### Encyclopaedia articles

* "Hylas," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
# Hylas (Coates)

"Unto the woodland spring he came"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1898), "Hylas" in Poems.
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "Hylas" in Poems II.
# Hymn ("O Thou, whose presence went before")

* “Hymn” (“Oh, Thou, whose presence went before”), in Poems Written During the Progress of the Abolition Question In the United States (1837)
* “Hymn” (“O Thou, whose presence went before”), in The Complete Poetical Works of John Greenleaf Whittier (1895)
# Lambert Run Coal Company v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
258 U.S. 377
Lambert Run Coal Company v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company
Argued: March 6 and 7, 1922. --- Decided: April 10, 1922
Messrs. Frank E. Harkness and Rush C. Butler, both of Chicago, Ill., and John A. Howard, of Wheeling, W. Va., for appellant.
Messrs. A. G. G.utheim, of Washington, D. C., R. V. Fletcher, of Chicago, Ill., Hugh L. Bond, Jr., of Baltimore, Md., and George E. Hamilton, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lambert v. Ackerly

* related portals: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurrence/Dissent Rymer
LAURA A. LAMBERT; ESTHER ACKLEY; STEVE BELLING; PAT COOKE; LETITIA SELK; and CHUCK VILTZ, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. BARRY ACKERLEY; WILLIAM ACKERLEY; SEATTLE SUPERSONICS, INC., a former Washington Corporation; SSI SPORTS, INC., a Washington Corporation; and FULL HOUSE SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a Washington Corporation, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.
Nos. 96-36017, 96-36266, 96-36267
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
180 F.3d 997
February 6, 1998, Argued and Submitted; October 1, 1998, Decided; March 9, 1999, Rehearing En Banc Granted and Opinion Withdrawn; April 22, 1999, Argued and Submitted, San Francisco, California --- June 10, 1999, Filed
Certiorari Denied January 18, 2000, Reported at: 2000 U.S. LEXIS 591.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. D.C. No. CV-95-00039-BJR. Barbara J. Rothstein, District Judge, Presiding.
AFFIRMED.
Spencer Hall, Jr., John W. Widell, and Kathryn Y. Kim, Mundt, MacGregor, Happel, Falconer, Zulauf & Hall, Seattle, Washington, for the plaintiffs-appellees-cross-appellants.
Eric M. Rubin, Walter Diercks, Rubin, Winston, Diercks, Harris & Cooke, Washington, D.C., Andrew L. Frey, Mayer, Brown & Platt, New York, New York, Robert P. Davis, Donald M. Falk, Miriam R. Nemetz, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Washington, D.C., for the defendants-appellants-cross-appellees.
Before: James R. Browning, Harry Pregerson, Stephen Reinhardt, Ferdinand F. Fernandez, Pamela Ann Rymer, Thomas G. Nelson, A. Wallace Tashima, Sidney R. Thomas, Barry G. Silverman, Kim M. Wardlaw, William A. Fletcher, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Reinhardt; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Rymer.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lambda Papers

A series of MIT AI Memos published between 1975 and 1980, developing the Scheme programming language and a number of influential concepts in programming language design and implementation.
| Title | Year | Number | Full title |
| Scheme: An Interpreter for Extended Lambda Calculus | 1975 | AIM-349 | |
| Lambda: The Ultimate Imperative | 1976 | AIM-353 | |
| Lambda: The Ultimate Declarative | 1976 | AIM-379 | |
| Lambda: The Ultimate GOTO | 1977 | AIM-443 | Debunking the "Expensive Procedure Call" Myth or, Procedure Call Implementations Considered Harmful or, Lambda: The Ultimate GOTO |
| The Art of the Interpreter | 1978 | AIM-453 | The Art of the Interpreter or, The Modularity Complex (Parts Zero, One, and Two) |
| Rabbit: A Compiler for Scheme | 1978 | AITR-474 | |
| Lambda: The Ultimate Opcode | 1979 | AIM-514 | Design of LISP-based Processors or, Scheme: A Dielectric LISP or, Finite Memories Considered Harmful or, Lambda: The Ultimate Opcode |
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. This page must provide all available authorship information.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lambda: The Ultimate Opcode

AI Memo 514, the seventh of the Lambda Papers.
# Karnuth v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
279 U.S. 231
Karnuth v. United States
Argued: March 5, 1929. --- Decided: April 8, 1929
Mr. Wm. D. Mitchell, Atty. Gen., for petitioners.
[Argument of Counsel from page 232 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Preston M. Albro, of Buffalo, N. Y., for respondents.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Karr v. Schmidt

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
401 U.S. 1201
Karr v. Schmidt, Principal of Coronado High School, et al.
On Motion to Vacate a Stay of Injunction Pending Appeal
No. N/A Argued: N/A --- Decided: February 11, 1971
Motion to vacate Court of Appeals' stay of District Court's order enjoining El Paso, Texas, public school authorities from enforcing rules regarding the length of schoolboys' hair is denied, as JUSTICE BLACK refuses to hold, or predict that this Court will hold, that federal courts have the constitutional power to interfere in this way with the public school system operated by the States.
See: 320 F. Supp. 728.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, Circuit Justice.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hyperion

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Hyperion."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Hyperion, a poem by John Keats.
* Hyperion, a novel by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow.
* 'Hyperion, a novel by Dan Simmons.
# Hypnos

Written March 1922. Published May 1923 in The National Amateur, Vol. 45, No. 5, pages 1-3.
* "Hypnos" in Weird Tales, 4 (2) (May-June-July 1924)
* "Hypnos" in Weird Tales, 30 (5) (November 1937)
# Hyperion (Longfellow)

HYPERION
A ROMANCE
BY
HENRY WADSWORTH LONGFELLOW
REVISED EDITION
“Look not mournfully into the Past. It comes not back again. Wisely improve the Present. It is thine. Go forth to meet the shadowy Future without fear, and with a manly heart.”
BOSTON
HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY New York: 85 Fifth Avenue The Riverside Press, Cambribge
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the years 1857 and 1869, by
HENRY WADSWORTH LONGFELLOW,
in the the Clerk’s Office of the District Court of the District of Massachusetts
The Riverside Press, Cambridge, Mass., U. S. A.
Printed by H. O. Houghton & Company.
CONTENTS
BOOK I.
BOOK II.
BOOK III.
BOOK IV.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hyperion (Keats)

"Hyperion" is an uncompleted epic poem by 19th-century English Romantic poet John Keats. It is based on the Titanomachia, and tells of the despair of the Titans after their fall to the Olympians. Keats wrote the poem from late 1818 until the spring of 1819, when he gave it up as having "too many Miltonic inversions." He was also nursing his brother Tom, who died in January of 1819 of tuberculosis.
The themes and ideas were picked up again in Keats's The Fall of Hyperion: A Dream, when he attempted to recast the epic by framing it with a personal quest to find truth and understanding.
    Warning: template has been deprecated.
* "Hyperion", in The Poetical Works of John Keats (1884)
* "Hyperion", in The complete poetical works and letters of John Keats (1899), edited by Horace Elisha Scudder
* "Hyperion", in Keats; poems published in 1820 (1909), edited by Margaret Robertson
# Jo's Boys
### Contents

* Chapter I. TEN YEARS LATER
* Chapter II. PARNASSUS
* Chapter III. JO'S LAST SCRAPE
* Chapter IV. DAN
* Chapter V. VACATION
* Chapter VI. LAST WORDS
* Chapter VII. THE LION AND THE LAMB
* Chapter VIII. JOSIE PLAYS MERMAID
* Chapter IX. THE WORM TURNS
* Chapter X. DEMI SETTLES
* Chapter XI. EMIL'S THANKSGIVING
* Chapter XII. DAN'S CHRISTMAS
* Chapter XIII. NAT'S NEW YEAR
* Chapter XIV. PLAYS AT PLUMFIELD
* Chapter XV. WAITING
* Chapter XVI. IN THE TENNIS-COURT
* Chapter XVII. AMONG THE MAIDS
* Chapter XVIII. CLASS DAY
* Chapter XIX. WHITE ROSES
* Chapter XX. LIFE FOR LIFE
* Chapter XXI. ASLAUGA'S KNIGHT
* Chapter XXII. POSITIVELY LAST APPEARANCE
# Illustrated Astronomy/Eclipses in Chile 2019 y 2020

Universidad Autónoma de Chile, pages 94–95
​VII ECLIPSES IN CHILE 2019 AND 2020
Chile and Argentina are going to witness two total eclipses of the Sun during 2019 and 2020. In the maps below, you can see the exact point where this wonder will be visible. The red line traces the central and long-lasting path. The blue lines trace the bounds from where the total eclipse happens. Out of that region, you can only see a partial solar eclipse.
​In the region of Coquimbo, the last total eclipse of the Sun was seen in 1893, 126 years ago, whereas La Araucanía has waited since 1467 to witness this phenomenon again.
In the case of Chile, the last total solar eclipse was on Easter Island in 2010. Now, after the eclipses of this year (2019, Coquimbo) and the two coming (2020, La Araucanía, and 2021, Chilean Antarctic), we have to wait until 2048 where we will be witnesses of another total solar eclipse in the region of Aysén.
# Knop v. Monongahela River Consolidated Coal & Coke Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
211 U.S. 485
Knop v. Monongahela River Consolidated Coal & Coke Company
Argued: December 18, 1908. --- Decided: January 4, 1909
An appeal was taken under § 5 of the act creating the circuit court of appeals. 26 Stat. at L. 826, 827, chap. 517, U.S.C.omp. Stat. 1901, pp. 488, 549. The mere construction of a state statute does not of itself present a Federal question. But the contention of appellants is that the circuit court improperly construed the act of 1904; that, correctly construed, it applies not merely to sales by boat or barge load, or some aliquot part thereof, but also to sales by weight or measurement; and that, under such construction, a question is presented of a conflict between it and the Federal Constitution.
But the difficulty with this contention is, first, that the statute construed, as applied to boat and barge loads, has been declared valid by this court; and, further, that there is no claim by the appellee of any invalidity in the statute, but only of its inapplicability to the facts. In the face of the decision of this court and the claim of the appellee, it is difficult to see how there can be any question of a conflict between the legislation and the Federal Constitution. After a final decision, it is going too far to hold that there still remains an undecided question, and that when we have held that a statute of a state is valid there remains a controversy as to its validity, and this is emphatically true when neither party challenges that decision. Nor, for like reason, does there appear any ground for holding that there is a question as to the construction or application of the Constitution. While in § 10 of article 1 of the Federal Constitution there is a recognition of the power of the state to pass inspection laws, yet, to justify a holding that the application of the Federal Constitution is involved, there should be a question as to the relation between some constitutional provision and the state statute.
Under these circumstances we are of opinion that this court has no jurisdiction, and the appeal must be dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Knott v. Botany Worsted Mills

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
179 U.S. 69
Knott v. Botany Worsted Mills
Argued: October 12, 13, 1899. --- Decided: October 22, 1900
Mr. J. Parker Kirlin for petitioner.
Messrs. Wilhelmus Mynderse and Black & Kneeland for respondents.
Mr. Justice Gray delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Le Morte d'Arthur/Volume II/Book XIII

Book XIII
* Chapter I: How at the vigil of the Feast of Pentecost entered into the hall before King Arthur a damosel, and desired Sir Launcelot for to come and dub a knight, and how he went with her
* Chapter II: How the letters were found written in the Siege Perilous and of the marvellous adventure of the sword in a stone
* Chapter III: How Sir Gawaine assayed to draw out the sword, and how an old man brought in Galahad
* Chapter IV: How the old man brought Galahad to the Siege Perilous and set him therein, and how all the knights marvelled
* Chapter V: How King Arthur shewed the stone hoving on the water to Galahad, and how he drew out the sword
* Chapter VI: How King Arthur had all the knights together for to joust in the meadow beside Camelot or they departed
* Chapter VII: How the queen desired to see Galahad; and how after, all the knights were replenished with the Holy Sangreal, and how they avowed the enquest of the same
* Chapter VIII: How great sorrow was made of the king and the queen and ladies for the departing of the knights, and how they departed
* Chapter IX: How Galahad gat him a shield, and how they sped that presumed to take down the said shield
* Chapter X: How Galahad departed with the shield, and how King Evelake had received the shield of Joseph of Aramathie
* Chapter XI: How Joseph made a cross on the white shield with his blood, and how Galahad was by a monk brought to a tomb
* Chapter XII: Of the marvel that Sir Galahad saw and heard in the tomb, and how he made Melias knight
* Chapter XIII: Of the adventure that Melias had, and how Galahad revenged him, and how Melias was carried into an abbey
* Chapter XIV: How Sir Galahad departed, and how he was commanded to go to the Castle of Maidens to destroy the wicked custom
* Chapter XV: How Sir Galahad fought with the knights of the castle, and destroyed the wicked custom
* Chapter XVI: How Sir Gawaine came to the abbey for to follow Galahad, and how he was shriven to a hermit
* Chapter XVII: How Sir Galahad met with Sir Launcelot and Sir Percivale, and smote them down, and departed from them
* Chapter XVIII: How Sir Launcelot, half sleeping and half waking, saw a sick man borne in a litter, and how he was healed with the Sangreal
* Chapter XIX: How a voice spake to Sir Launcelot, and how he found his horse and his helm borne away, and after went afoot
* Chapter XX: How Sir Launcelot was shriven, and what sorrow he made and of the good ensamples which were shewed him
# Joseph Fawcett Letter 1828-03-03

This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
Source: Handwritten original in the private collection of the Chambless family. Transcribed to softcopy by Susan D. Chambless, 1998.

##### Folded Letter, To:

Mr. Lyle B. Fawcett, Richmond, Va.

##### Contents:

Harrisonburg 3rd March 1828
Dear Son
Doct Sherdlin, shipped from Baltimore on the 28th of september last two Boxes of goods marked B. R ds Dr D. Sherdlin on board the Schooner Brazil to be delivered at the packet office Petersburg, freight Seventy five cents, these Boxes were intended by Doct. Shardlin to have been sent to the packet office at Fredericksburg, where he had applied but did not find them, and was under an impression that were lost until recently he has discovered the mistake, the object therefore of this communication is to prevail on you to get these goods up from Petersburg and to forward them to this place by some safe hand as they are valueable articles belonging to his sisters.
John Rader was here to day and we had an interview on the subject of his property on the creek. he will not agree to rent for more than three years. he appears to expect some courting. We shal not agree. And I feel no disposition to engage in a project so fraught with vexation and insult as I apprehend this would be it is true the most of our neighbors are civil but I frequently experience the cold supercillious contempt of a poor mortal like my self.
Warden Morris of philadelphia writes me that if I can raise one third of the amt in money that he will furnish me with a shop of Drugs worth $1500. I had written to him on the subject this is his offer no great favor I think, yet I belive if I were there he would probably have do better.
David Jones has administered of B. Quinn, the goods will be sold. I am yet inclined to believe that we might possibly ge the beginning of a Small store for me out of it, if I could get a few articles out of them with a few from Morris of Pha I would trye my luck some where or other
all well. Jo. Fawcett
P.S. Doct Sherdlin has the bill of lading, if it is necessary he will send it to you.
# Joseph Fawcett Letter 1833-05-23

This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
Source: Handwritten original in the private collection of the Chambless family. Transcribed to softcopy by Susan D. Chambless, 1998.
Folded Letter, Address:
Masters Marcellus & Curtus Fawcett, Near Lewisburg, Greenbriar Cty, VA
Contents:
Callaghan’s 23rd May 1833
My Dear Sons,
your letter of the 21st is to hand in which you request us to send an English Reader and 2 Slates. The slates were sent to you the day before yesterday, I presume you have received them before this time, and we now send you an English reader with an atlas and if you will send to Mr Matthews he will let you have an other arithmetick. Perkins is also directed to pay the Tailor for Marcellus’ Vest which may be got at the same time you send for the Book.
I am very much pleased with this, your first letter to me, the hand writing, as well as composition, considering that it is among the first, if not the first you ever wrote is good, and the spelling excellent. this essay does you great credit, in My Opinion. I would however advise you to set your letters a little further apart, and to Make the Staves Shorter. You must also get Mr. Taylor to assist you in dividing your next into paragraps, and to point the sentences and parts of Sentens
I do not want you to spend Much time at Grammar, yet I do not want it to to be wholey neglected. My sure opinion is, that it is a science too abstruse to be well understood by young persons, nothing short of a goodeal of experience and a ripe understanding can master it yet there are certain first principles which may be understood easily, for example you can very soon know by a little attention whether a word is a noun, a verb or an adjective that is whether the word means a certain thing, a certain action or a certain quality. These three divisions of speech well understood will naturly as you gain experience, and your Judgments ripen, enable you to comprehend the whole. Show this to Mr Taylor
we received on yesterday a letter from your brother Lyle Branson. he is very well and writes as if in good spirits.
let me beg of you to not neglect to write to some one of us frequently. it will not only keep us advised how you are doing but it will also qualify in some measure for writing letters in business which probably lyes before you at no distant day, and depend on it there are few things we do in this life better calculated to call the attention of those we correspond with to our qualifications for business, than that of writing a letter,
all well Joseph Fawcett
I have sometimes thought grammarians have made their subject more difficult to comprehend by too much explanation and dividing it into too many cases. so many rules subject to so many exceptions are not well calculated to enlighten the learner, but as I do not profess to be much of a Grammarian I shall leave this to Mr Taylor’s discretion.
J. F.
your sister also sends a vest for Curtus and a shirt for Marcellus
# Joseph Gurney

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Joseph Gurney."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Gurney, Joseph (1804-1879), shorthand writer and biblical scholar, eldest son of William Brodie Gurney, grandson of Joseph Gurney (1744-1815)
* Gurney, Joseph (1744-1815) found under Gurney, Thomas,his father, whom he assisted and succeeded as a shorthand-writer both in courts of law and parliament. Edited 9th edition of Thomas Gurney's ‘Brachygraphy’ in 1778
* Gurney, Joseph John (1788–1847), philanthropist and religious writer, brother of Samuel and Danial Gurney. Of his sisters, Elizabeth, became Mrs. Fry, and Hannah married Sir Thomas Fowell Buxton