OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Katzenberger v. Aberdeen

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
121 U.S. 172
Katzenberger v. Aberdeen
Calvin Perkins, for plaintiff in error.
E. O. Sykes and Baxter McFarlan, for defendant in error.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kaufer v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
394 U.S. 458
Kaufer v. United States
See 395 U.S. 917, 89 S.Ct. 1741.
Frederick H. Block and Herbert Monte Levy, for petitioner.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Roger A. Pauley, for the United States.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kaufer v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
394 U.S. 458
Kaufer v. United States
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Desist v. United States, 394 U.S. 244, 89 S.Ct. 1030, 1048, 32 L.Ed.2d 248.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS and Mr. Justice FORTAS dissent for the affirmance of the judgment.
Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice WHITE would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kaufman v. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S.A.

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Reed
United States Supreme Court
343 U.S. 156
Kaufman v. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S.A.
Argued: Jan. 2, 1952. --- Decided: April 7, 1952
Mr. Irving Moskovitz, New York City, for petitioners.
Mr. David Schwartz, Washington, D.C., for respondents, mCgrath, et al.
Mr. John J. Wilson, Washington, D.C., for respondent, Societe Internationale etc.
Messrs. William P. MacCracken, Urban A. Lavery, and William W. Barron, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent, Remington Rand, Inc.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kaufman v. Tredway

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
195 U.S. 271
Kaufman v. Tredway
Argued: October 24, 1904. --- Decided: November 28, 1904
On August 20, 1898, Gustave Kaufman filed his petition in bankruptcy and was subsequently adjudged and decreed a bankrupt. W. T. Tredway was appointed trustee of his estate. On July 24, 1899, the trustee commenced suit in the court of common pleas, No. 3, of Allegheny county, Pennsylvania, to recover from Joseph S. Kaufman the sum of $4,086.64, charged to have been given, on August 4, 1898, by the bankrupt to the defendant as a preference. The trial resulted in a judgment in favor of the trustee for $1,086.64 and interest. This judgment was affirmed on appeal by the superior court. An application for a further appeal to the supreme court of the state was denied, and thereupon this writ of error was sued out to review the judgment of the superior court. Section 60 of the bankrupt act is as follows:
'Section 60. (a) A person shall be deemed to have given a preference if, being insolvent, he has procured or suffered a judgment to be entered against himself in favor of any person, or made a transfer of any of his property, and the effect of the* enforcement of such judgment or transfer will be to enable any one of his creditors to obtain a greater percentage of his debt than any other of such creditors of the same class.
'(b) If a bankrupt shall have given a preference within four months before the filing of a petition, or after the filing of the petition, and before the adjudication, and the person receiving it, or to be benefited thereby, or his agent acting therein, shall have had reasonable cause to believe that it was intended thereby to give a preference, it shall be viodable by the trustee, and he may recover the property or its value from such person.
'(c) If a creditor has been preferred, and afterwards in good faith gives the debtor further credit, without security of any kind, for property which becomes a part of the debtor's estate, the amount of such new credit remaining unpaid at the time of the adjudication in bankruptcy may be set off against the amount which would otherwise be recoverable from him.' 30 Stat. at L. 544, 562, chap. 541, July 1, 1898, U.S.C.omp. Stat. 1901, p. 3445.
Messrs. Joseph A. Langfitt and William Kaufman for plaintiff in error.
Messrs.
H. L. Castle, William A. Stone, and Stone & Stone for defendant in error.
Statement by Mr. Justice Brewer: Mr. Justice Brewer, delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kapalkundala (Ghose)/Part 1/Chapter 7

CHAPTER VII.
In Quest.
On the other hand, the Kapalik, after having had some hunting for the axe within the cottage-bounds, found neither the axe nor Kapalkundala. So he hastened back to the sands in a suspicious mood of mind. On his return he could not see Nabokumar there. At this, his astonishment grew intense. Soon after, his wandering eyes lighted on the broken bonds of creepers. Then the conviction was borne in upon him ​and he started out in search of Nabokumar. But it was impossible to make out in such a wilderness either the path or the direction the run-aways had taken. The visibility being low owing to darkness, he could not spot either of them. He moved about for sometime aiming at the sound of voice. But the voice was not audible everytime. So with the object of a close survey of the outlying grounds he mounted the crest of a sand-hill of a higher elevation. The Kapalik climbed the height from one side. He did not know that the base of the sand mound on the opposite side was worn-out and loose with rivulets of water running down in the rains. No sooner had the Kapalik got on the summit than the crown of the sand-hill in its tumble-down condition gave way under the heavy weight of his body and came down with a terrific crash. The falling debris dragged down the Kapalik along with it like a wild buffalo torn from its crest.
# Japanese Jingles

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Japanese Jingles."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Japanese Jingles (1889?) by Katheleen Lucas
* Japanese Jingles (1891/1893) by Mae St. John Bramhall
# James H. Rowe, Jr. to Missy LeHand (May 14, 1941)

* related portals: World War II.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
THE WHITE HOUSE
washington
MAY 14, 1941
Memorandum for Miss LeHand.
Dear Missy:
Rudolph Hess
Because you told me that someone else had the same idea I had and that Steve Early sent him up to the British Embassy, I thought you might not give the President my memorandum today.
I have been trained as a skeptic in all things -- and I include Hess -- but, assuming this idea is worthwhile, it wll never get anywhere with the professional career men in the British Embassy or the State Department.
It is a "telephone" job between the President and Churchill, both of whom have imagination enough to see the advantage to both countries, and also because time is of the essence. Even tomorrow may be too late.
James Rowe, Jr.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# James Hooker v. Martin Knapp No 773 Eagle White Lead Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
225 U.S. 3028
JAMES J. HOOKER et al., Appts., v. MARTIN A. KNAPP et al., Appellees. NO 773. EAGLE WHITE LEAD COMPANY et al., Appts.,
Argued: January 11, 1912. --- Decided: June 7, 1912
Mr. Francis B. James for appellants.
Assistant Attorney General Denison and Messrs. Jesse C. Adkins and Blackburn Esterline, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 303-305 intentionally omitted]
Mr. P. J. Farrell for the Interstate Commerce Commission.
Mr. R. Walton Moore for the Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co.
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# James Hooker v. Martin Knapp No 773 Eagle White Lead Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
225 U.S. 3028
JAMES J. HOOKER et al., Appts., v. MARTIN A. KNAPP et al., Appellees. NO 773. EAGLE WHITE LEAD COMPANY et al., Appts.,
Argued: January 11, 1912. --- Decided: June 7, 1912
The appellants in these cases originally applied to the Interstate Commerce Commission for reduction of the maximum rates between Cincinnati and Chattanooga from the 76c. schedule to a 60c. schedule. The Commission refused to make the full extent of this reduction. Thereupon the respective parties filed bills in the commerce court, demanding that the Commission's order be 'suspended, set aside, annulled, and declared void and of no effect,' and that the individual defendants and the Commission be required by mandatory injunction to set aside and annul the said order, that the case be reopened, and the complainants given further relief. The two bills were consolidated. The individual defendants, the Commission, and the railroad company all demurred to the bill on the merits. The United States moved to dismiss on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction. The court took jurisdiction, but dismissed on the merits. These appeals were then prosecuted. The cases are, in all respects, controlled by the opinion announced and ruling made in the Procter & Gamble Case, this day decided [[[225 U.S. 282]], 56 L. ed. --, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 761], and for the reasons in that case stated, these cases must be and are remanded, with directions to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, and it is so ordered.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# James H. Rowe, Jr. to Franklin D. Roosevelt (May 14, 1941)

* related portals: World War II.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
May 14, 1941
Memorandum For The President.
Rudolph Hess
Possibly this idea is crudely amateurish; probably a number of people have already though of it. Certainly there are a number of "ifs" involved — the "ifs" of sanity, of good intentions, and of truth. But it might be worth trying.
The flight of Rudolph Hess has captured the American imagination as has nothing since the flight of the lamented Lindbergh. It may only be a seven-day wonder but the "man in the street" today regards it as a wonder.
No amount of conversation about economic penetration of South America or Nazi trade wars, or even the necessity for survival of the British navy seems to have convinced the American people, particularly the middle and far West, that this country is in danger from the Nazis.
But if Hess were to tell the world what Hitler has said about the United States, it would be a headline sensation. The people would begin to wake up. Recollection of the unpleasant Zinovieff letter indicates the possibilities. I am suggesting, of course, only that Hess make such a statement if it is true — which it is.
If the idea is worthwhile, it should be done soon, while the American people are fascinated. It certainly should not be included with a great number of other things, such as Hitler's rapprochement with Russia, the economic conditions of Germany, etc. It should probably be done with American newspapermen present; otherwise the Nazis — as they already are beginning to do — will recreate the American suspicion of British propaganda.
I know you and I think Churchill can see the possibilities; I doubt if the professional career servant will.
But, if there is anything to the idea it should be done in the next day or so; otherwise it will not be believed.
James Rowe, Jr.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Korea & Her Neighbours

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
A Narrative of Travel, with an Account of the Recent Vicissitudes and Present Position of the Country With a Preface by Sir Walter C. Hillier, K.C.M.G. Late British Consul-General for Korea
Contents
PREFACE
Author's Prefatory Note
Introductory Chapter
Chapter I. First Impressions of Korea
Chapter II. First Impressions of the Capital
Chapter III. The Kur-dong
Chapter IV. Seoul, the Korean Mecca
Chapter V. The Sailing of the Sampan
Chapter VI. On the River of Golden Sand
Chapter VII. Views Afloat
Chapter VIII. Natural Beauty — The Rapids
Chapter IX. Korean Marriage Customs
Chapter X. The Korean Pony — Korean Roads and Inns
Chapter XI. Diamond Mountain Monasteries
Chapter XII. Along the Coast
Chapter XIII. Impending War — Excitement at Chemulpo
Chapter XIV. Deported to Manchuria
Chapter XV. A Manchurian Deluge — A Passenger Cart — An Accident
Chapter XVI. Mukden and its Missions
Chapter XVII. Chinese Troops on the March
Chapter XVIII. Nagasaki — Wladivostok
Chapter XIX. Korean Settlers in Siberia
Chapter XX. The Trans-Siberian Railroad
Chapter XXI. The King's Oath — An Audience
Chapter XXII. A Transition Stage
Chapter XXIII. The Assassination of the Queen
Chapter XXIV. Burial Customs
Chapter XXV. Song-do: A Royal City
Chapter XXVI. The Phyong-yang Battlefield
Chapter XXVII. Northward Ho
Chapter XXVIII. Over the An-kil Yung Pass
Chapter XXIX. Social Position of Women
Chapter XXX. Exorcists and Dancing Women
Chapter XXXI. The Hair-cropping Edict
Chapter XXXII. The Reorganized Korean Government
Chapter XXXIII. Education and Foreign Trade
Chapter XXXIV. Dæmonism or Shamanism
Chapter XXXV. Notes on Dæmonism Concluded
Chapter XXXVI. Seoul in 1897
Chapter XXXVII. Last Words on Korea
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Korbly v. Springfield Inst. for Savings

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
245 U.S. 330
Korbly v. Springfield Inst. for Savings
Argued: Nov. 8, 1917. --- Decided: Dec 10, 1917
Mr. Charles G. Gardner, of Springfield, Mass., for Korbly, receiver.
Messrs. Boyd B. Jones, of Boston, Mass., and William H. Brooks, of Holyoke, Mass., for Springfield Inst. for Savings.
Mr. Justice CLARKE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Korea

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Korea."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, quotes, news, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Korea," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Korea," in The Encyclopedia Americana, New York: The Encyclopedia Americana Corporation (1920)
* "Korea," in Collier's New Encyclopedia, New York: P. F. Collier & Son Co. (1921)

## See also

* Portal:Korea
# Kordel v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
335 U.S. 345
Kordel v. United States
Argued: Oct. 14, 1948. --- Decided: Nov 22, 1948
See 335 U.S. 900, 69 S.Ct. 298.
Mr. Arthur D. Herrick, of New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Philip B. Perlman, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Opinion of the Court by Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, announced by Mr. Justice REED.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Johanson v. Washington

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
190 U.S. 179
Johanson v. Washington
Argued: May 1, 1903. --- Decided: June 1, 1903
This was an action of ejectment brought in the superior court of King county, Washington. The case was tried by the court without a jury. An agreed statement of facts was submitted, upon which the court found the following facts and conclusions of law:
'1. That the north half of the southwest quarter and the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of section 3, township 25 north, range 4 east, is of the value of $20,000, and was selected by Phillip H. Lewis, as agent for King county, Washington territory, by filing a list of this and other lands, designated as list No. 2 of indemnity school selection, at the land office at Olympia, Washington territory, May 24, 1870, under an act of Congress approved March 2, 1853, and an act of Congress approved February 26, 1859, which said selection was approved by Secretary C. Delano, January 27, 1872.
'2. March 13, 1893, Anton Johanson made application to enter the land aforesaid under the homestead laws, and at that time made a settlement thereon; he has ever since lived on said land; his application was rejected by the local land office, and subsequently appealed to the Commissioner of the General Land Office, and finally to the Secretary of the Interior, who, on December 18, 1895, decided adversely to Anton Johanson.
'From the foregoing facts the court finds as conclusions of law:
'1. That the plaintiff was, on the 13th day of March, 1893, seised in fee and possessed and entitled to the possession to said north half of the southwest quarter and the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter, section 3, township 25 north, range 4 east.
'2. That on the said 13th day of March, 1893, defendant unlawfully entered said premises and ejected the plaintiff therefrom, and unlawfully retains possession thereof.'
The judgment of the superior court having been affirmed by the supreme court of the state (26 Wash. 668, 67 Pac. 401), the case was brought here on error.
Messrs. C. W. Corliss, O. C. McGilvra, Henry W. Lung, and John F. Main for plaintiff in error.
Mr. W. B. Stratton for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Johannes Agricola in Meditation

Layout 2
There's heaven above, and night by night  I look right through its gorgeous roof; No suns and moons though e'er so bright  Avail to stop me; splendor-proof  I keep the broods of stars aloof: For I intend to get to God  For 'tis to God I speed so fast, For in God's breast my own abode,  Those shoals of dazzling glory, past,  I lay my spirit down at last. 10 I lie where I have always lain,  God smiles as he has always smiled; Ere suns and moons could wax and wane,  Ere stars were thundergirt or piled  The heavens, God thought on me his child; Ordained a life for me, arrayed  Its circumstances, every one To the minutest; ay, God said  This head this hand should rest upon  Thus, ere he fashioned star or sun 20 And having thus created me,  Thus rooted me, he bade me grow, Guiltless forever, like a tree  That buds and blooms, nor seeks to know  The law by which it prospers so: But sure that thought and word and deed  All go to swell his love for me, Me, made because that love had need  Of something irreversibly  Pledged solely its content to be. 30 Yes, yes, a tree which must ascend,  No poison-gourd foredoomed to stoop! I have God's warrant, could I blend  All hideous sins, as in a cup,  To drink the mingled venoms up; Secure my nature will convert  The draught to blossoming gladness fast: While sweet dews turn to the gourd's hurt,  And bloat, and while they bloat it, blast,  As from the first its lot was cast. 40 For as I lie, smiled on, full-fed  By unexhausted power to bless, I gaze below on hell's fierce bed,  And those its waves of flame oppress,  Swarming in ghastly wretchedness; Whose life on earth aspired to be  One alter-smoke, so pure!—to win If not love like God's love for me,  At least to keep his anger in;  And all their striving turned to sin. 50 Priest, doctor, hermit, monk grown white  With prayer, the broken-hearted nun, The martyr, the wan acolyte,  The incense-swinging child,—undone  Before God fashioned star or sun! God, whom I praise; how could I praise,  If such as I might understand, Make out and reckon on his ways,  And bargain for his love, and stand, Paying a price, at his right hand? 60
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse