OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/15th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 48

Chap. XLVIII.—An Act supplementary to the acts concerning the coasting trade.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That for the more ​Act of Feb. 18, 1793, ch. 8. Act of May 7, 1822, ch. 62, sec. 11. The seacoast and navigable rivers of the United States divided into two great districts, for the convenience of the coasting trade. Licensed vessels, of 20 tons and upwards, may carry on trade between the districts within the great districts, and between a state in one, and an adjoining state in another, great district, &c.convenient regulation of the coasting trade, the seacoast and navigable rivers of the United States be, and hereby are, divided into two great districts; the first, to include all the districts on the seacoast and navigable rivers, between the eastern limits of the United States and the southern limits of Georgia, and the second, to include all the districts on the seacoast and navigable rivers, between the river Perdido and the western limits of the United States.
Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That every ship or vessel, of the burden of twenty tons or upwards, licensed to trade between the different districts of the United States, shall be, and is hereby authorized to carry on such trade between the districts included within the aforesaid great districts, respectively, and between a state in one, and an adjoining state in another, great district, in manner, and subject only to the regulations that are, now by law required to be observed by such ships or vessels, in trading from one district to another in the same state, or from a district in one state to a district in the next adjoining state, any thing in any law to the contrary, notwithstanding.
Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That every ship or vessel, of the burden of twenty tons or upwards, licensed to trade as aforesaid, shall be, and is hereby, required, in trading from one to another great district, other than between a state in one, and an adjoining state in another, great district, to conform and observeRegulations to be observed. the regulations, that, at the time of passing this act, are required to be observed by such vessels in trading from a district in one state to a district in any other than an adjoining state.
Trade between districts not included, &c. to be carried on as already provided.Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That the trade between the districts not included in either of the two great districts aforesaid, shall continue to be carried on in the manner, and subject to the regulations, already provided for this purpose.
This act to be in force from 30th June, 1819.Sec. 5. And be it further enacted, That this act shall commence and be in force, from and after the thirtieth day of June next after the passing thereof.
Approved, March 2, 1819.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/15th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 41

Chap. XLI.—An Act allowing further time to complete the issuing and locating of military land warrants.
The authority granted to the Secretary of War, by the acts of 6th May 1812, and 10th Dec. 1814, to issue military bounty land warrants, continued until 4th March, 1824. 1814, ch. 10. 1812, ch. 77. Act of Dec. 10, 1814, ch. 10. The time limited for issuing and located military land extended. Act of March 9, 1818, ch. 15. Act of March 2, 1821, ch. 15. Act of March 1, 1823, ch. 38. Act of March 3, 1825, ch. 111.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the authority granted to the Secretary for the Department of War, by the second section of the act to provide for designating, surveying, and granting, the military bounty lands, approved the sixth day of May, one thousand eight hundred and twelve, and by the fourth section of the act making further provision for filling the ranks of the army of the United States, approved December tenth, one thousand eight hundred and fourteen, to issue warrants for the military land bounties to persons entitled thereto, shall be revived, and continued in force for the term of five years from and after the fourth day of March next.
Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the time limited by the act supplementary to the act further extending the time for issuing and locating military land warrants, and for other purposes, approved March ninth, one thousand eight hundred and eighteen, for issuing military land warrants, shall be extended to the fourth day of March, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-one, and the time limited by the said act for the location of unlocated military land warrants, shall be extended to the first day of October thereafter.
Approved, February 20, 1819.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/15th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 4

Chap. IV.—An Act concerning the western district court of Pennsylvania.
No suit, action, &c. depending and undetermined on the 20th April, 1818, to be discontinued or abated, on account of the court not having been holden on the first Monday of June, 1818. Act of April 20, 1818, ch. 108. Act of May 26, 1824, ch. 170.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That no suit, action, plea, process, or proceeding, at law or in equity, which, on the twentieth day of April last, was depending and undetermined in the district or circuit court of the United States for the district of Pennsylvania, and by law directed to be removed to the district court of the United States for the western district of Pennsylvania, shall be discontinued or abated on account of the said court not having been opened and holden on the first Monday of June last, agreeably to the act of Congress passed on the twentieth day of April last; but that all such suits, actions, pleas, process, and proceedings, both at law and in equity, shall be deemed, taken, and, to all intents and purposes, be held to be depending in the said district court for the western district of Pennsylvania, as fully and effectually as if the said court had been opened and holden on the said first Monday of June last.
The court authorized to make rules and orders touching such suits, as if it had been holden.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the said court be, and is hereby, authorized and empowered, from time to time, to make all such rules and orders touching such suits, actions, pleas, process, and proceedings, at law and in equity, as they might or could have done, if said court had been opened and holden on the said first Monday of June.
Suits, &c., hereafter transferred to be deemed pending as if they had been entered, and the court holden on the 20th of June last.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That all suits, actions, pleas, process, and proceedings, aforesaid, which may be hereafter certified and transferred from the district or circuit court of the United States for the district of Pennsylvania, to the district court of the United States for the western district of Pennsylvania, shall, to all intents and purposes, be deemed and taken to be depending in the said court on the said first Monday of June last, and the same proceedings may be had therein as if the same had been on that day entered in the said court agreeably to the act of Congress aforesaid.
Approved, December 16, 1818.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/15th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 43

Chap. XLIII.—An Act supplementary to the act entitled “An act to provide for the prompt settlement of public accounts.”
Act of March 3, 1817, ch. 45. Act of Feb. 24, 1819, ch. 43. The 2d auditor to receive unsettled accounts of Indian affairs. Proviso.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the third day of March next, it shall be the duty of the second auditor of the treasury, to receive all unsettled accounts arising out of Indian affairs, with the exception of those appertaining to Indian trade, and examine the same, and thereafter certify the balance, and transmit the accounts, with the vouchers and certificates, to the second comptroller, for his decision thereon: Provided, That if, in the opinion of the President of the United States, the public interest and convenience would be promoted by assigning all, or any part of, the said accounts to the third auditor, he shall be, and hereby is, authorized to make such assignment accordingly.
Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That it shall be the duty of the auditor charged with the examination of the accounts as aforesaid, to keep all accounts of the receipts and expenditures of the public money in regard to them; to receive from the second comptroller the accounts which shall have been finally adjusted, and to preserve such accounts, with the vouchers and certificates.Duty of the auditor. And it shall be the duty of the said auditor to make such reports on the business hereby assigned to him, as the Secretary of War may deem necessary, and require, from time to time, for the service of the War Department.
The treasurer or to disburse moneys for Indian department. Countersigned, &c.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That the treasurer of the United States shall disburse all such moneys as shall have been previously ordered for the use of the Indian Department, with the exception of those relating to Indian trade before mentioned, by warrants from the treasury; which disbursements shall be made pursuant to warrants drawn by the Secretary of War, and countersigned by the second comptroller, and registered by the second and third auditor, as the case may be.
Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That so much of the act to which this is a supplement, as is inconsistent with this act, be, and the same is hereby, repealed.
Approved, February 24, 1819.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/15th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 45

Chap. XLV.—An Act to regulate the pay of the army when employed on fatigue duty.
Extra allowance to non-commissioned officers and privates, when employed on fortifications, &c.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That, whenever it shall be found expedient to employ the army at work on fortifications, in surveys, in cutting roads, and other constant labour, of not less than ten days, the non-commissioned officers, musicians and privates, so employed, shall be allowed fifteen cents, and an extra gill of whisky or spirits, each, per day, while so employed.
Approved, March 2, 1819.
# United States v. Diamond/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
356 U.S. 257
United States v. Diamond
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Diamond

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
356 U.S. 257
United States v. Diamond
Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mr. J. F. Bishop, for the United States.
Mr. Robert L. Brock, for respondent David Diamond.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Diamond Coal & Coke Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
255 U.S. 323
United States v. Diamond Coal & Coke Company
Argued: Nov. 11, 1920. --- Decided: , March 7, 1921
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Nebeker, for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from page 324-325 intentionally omitted]
Mr. W. B. Rodgers, of Anaconda, Mont., for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 325-329 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Dickerson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
310 U.S. 554
United States v. Dickerson
Argued: April 26, 1940. --- Decided: May 27, 1940
Messrs. Robert H. Jackson, Atty. Gen., and Francis M. Shea, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Mr. Herman J. Galloway, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Dickey

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
268 U.S. 378
United States v. Dickey
Argued: April 16 and 17, 1925. --- Decided: May 25, 1925
Mr. James M. Beck, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., and the Attorney General, for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 379-381 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. M. H. Winger and James A. Reed, both of Kansas City, Mo., for defendants in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 382-384 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Di Re

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
332 U.S. 581
United States v. Di Re
Argued
Oct. 17, 1947.
Decided Jan. 5, 1948.
Mr. Frederick Bernays Wiener, of Providence, R.I., for petitioner.
Mr. Charles J. McDonough, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/17th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 3

Chap. III.—An Act making a partial appropriation for the support of government for the year one thousand eight hundred and twenty-three.
Appropriation for the compensation of the Senate and House of Representatives.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the sum of two hundred and sixty-five thousand one hundred and forty dollars be, and the same hereby is, appropriated, for the compensation granted by law to the Senate and House of Representatives: and that the same be paid out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, January 14, 1823.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/17th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 34

Chap. XXXIV.—An Act to continue in force the act, entitled “An act to provide for reports of decisions of the Supreme Court,” passed the third day of March, one thousand eight hundred and seventeen.
Compensation to reporter of Supreme Court decisions. Proviso.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the reporter who shall, from time to time, be appointed by the Supreme Court of the United States, to report its decisions, shall be entitled to receive, from the treasury of the United States, as an annual compensation for his services, the sum of one thousand dollars; Provided, nevertheless, The said compensation shall not be paid unless the said reporter shall print and publish, or cause to be printed and published, the decisions of said court, made during the time he shall act as such reporter, within nine months after such decisions shall be made; and shall deliver eighty copies of the decisions, so printed and published, to the Secretary of State, without any expense to the United States; which copies shall be distributed as follows, to wit: to the President of the United States,Distribution of reports. the judges of the Supreme Court, the judges of the district courts, the Attorney General of the United States, the Secretaries of State, Treasury, War, and Navy, the comptrollers of the treasury, and the judges of the several territories of the United States, one copy each; five copies for the use of each House of Congress; and the residue of the copies shall be deposited in the library of Congress.
Copies, in case of decease, to be delivered to successors in office.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That in case of the death, resignation, or dismission from office, of either of the officers before mentioned, the said copies of the decisions, delivered to them as aforesaid, shall belong to, and be delivered over to, their successors in said offices.
Act to continue three years.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That this act shall be, and continue, in force for three years, and no longer.
Approved, March 3, 1823.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/17th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 35

Chap. XXXV.—An Act to carry into effect the ninth article of the treaty concluded between the United States and Spain, the twenty-second day of February, one thousand eight hundred and nineteen.
Judges of the superior courts of Florida to adjust the claims under the ninth article of the Florida treaty.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the judges of the superior courts established at St. Augustine and Pensacola, in the territory of Florida, respectively, shall be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to receive and adjust all claims, arising within their respective jurisdictions, of the inhabitants of said territory, or their representatives, agreeably to the provisions of the ninth article of the treaty with Spain, by which the said territory was ceded to the United States.
Decision with evidence to be reported to the Secretary of the Treasury.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That, in all cases in which said judges shall decide in favour of the claimants, the decisions, with the evidence on which they are founded, shall be, by the said judges, reported to the Secretary of the Treasury, who, on being satisfied that the same is just and equitable, within the provisions of the said treaty, shall pay the amount thereof to the person or persons in whose favour the same is adjudged, out of any money in the treasury, not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, March 3, 1823.
# United States v. Kaufman

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Kaufman."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Kaufman (96 U.S. 567)
* United States v. Kaufman (267 U.S. 408)
See also Kaufman v. United States.
# United States v. Katz

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
271 U.S. 354
United States v. Katz
Argued: March 11, 1926. --- Decided: May 24, 1926
Mr. William D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., Mrs. Mabel Walker Willebrandt, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Mr. Mahlon D. Kiefer, of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
Messrs. Wm. T. Connor, John R. K. Scott, and Benjamin M. Golder, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Kaufman (267 U.S. 408)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
267 U.S. 408
United States v. Kaufman (267 U.S. 408)
Argued: Jan. 13, 1925. --- Decided: March 2, 1925
Mr. Merrill E. Otis, of St. Joseph, Mo., and the Attorney General, for petitioners.
Mr. J. M. Hartfield, of New York City, for respondents.
Mr. Justice SANFORD delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/19th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 25

Chap. XXV.—An Act to authorize the state of Pennsylvania to lay out and make a canal through the United States’ public ground, near the city of Pittsburg.
Consent of Congress given to lay out and make a canal through the United States’ public ground. Proviso.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the consent of Congress is hereby given to the state of Pennsylvania, to lay out and make a canal through the United States’ public ground at the village of Lawrenceville, near the city of Pittsburg: Provided, That, in laying out and making said canal, the said state, the engineers, artisans, or labourers, by her employed, shall not interfere with, or injure, any of the buildings, improvements, or other works, erected, or that may hereafter be erected by, or for the use of, the United States.
Bridges to be erected and kept in repair fit for the passage of carts and wagons.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That, as a condition on which the assent of Congress is given, wherever said canal shall cross any public or private road, or highway, in said public ground, the state of Pennsylvania shall cause bridges to be erected fit for the passage of carts and wagons; and forever thereafter keep and maintain the said bridges passable and in good repair, without receiving any toll or tolls, or any other compensation whatever.
Approved, April 14, 1826.