OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Executive Order 9158

more info.
See the Notes section for a list of Executive Orders affected by or related to the issuance of this Executive Order.
Signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt Monday, May 11, 1942
Federal Register page & date: 7 FR 3541, Thursday, May 14, 1942
By virtue of the authority vested in me as President of the United States and as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, it is hereby ordered that an Air Medal, with accompanying ribbons, be established for award to any person who, while serving in any capacity in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard of the United States subsequent to September 8, 1939, distinguishes, or has distinguished, himself by meritorious achievement while participating in an aerial flight.
The Air Medal and appurtenances thereto shall be of appropriate design approved by the Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, and the Secretary of the Treasury, and, under such regulations as said Secretaries may prescribe, may be awarded by the Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, or the Secretary of the Treasury, or by such commanding officers of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, or Coast Guard as the said Secretaries may respectively designate. Awards to personnel of the Coast Guard when serving under his jurisdiction shall be made by or under the direction of the Secretary of the Navy.
No more than one Air Medal shall be awarded to any one person, but for each succeeding meritorious achievement justifying such an award a suitable bar or other device may be awarded to be worn with the medal as prescribed by appropriate regulations. In the event of a posthumous award, the medal, bar, or device may be presented to such representative of the deceased as may be designated in the award.

## Notes

Shortcut: WS:USEO

### Amended by

* Executive Order 9242-A, September 11, 1942

### See Related

* Transfer Order 30 of the Secretary of Defense dated December 10, 1948 (13 FR 8163)
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 9132-A

more info.
See the Notes section for a listing of Executive Orders affected by or related to the issuance of this Executive Order.
Signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt Monday, April 13, 1942
Federal Register page and date:, Not Published
This Executive Order was not received for Federal Register publication. It is a confidential order

## Notes

Shortcut: WS:USEO

### Superseded by

* Executive Order 9427-A, February 24, 1944; ( Confidential - Not Published )

### See Related

* Executive Order 4846-A, March 30, 1928; ( Confidential - Not Published )
* Executive Order 5197-A, September 30, 1929; ( Confidential - Not Published )
* Executive Order 5638, June 8, 1931;
* Executive Order 5638-A, June 8, 1931;
* Executive Order 5855, June 6, 1932;
* Executive Order 5855-A, June 6, 1932;
* Executive Order 6472, December 2, 1933;
* Executive Order 7251, December 19, 1935;
* Executive Order 8193-A, July 5, 1939;
* Executive Order 10369-A, July 1, 1952; ( Confidential - Not Published )
* Executive Order 10571-A, October 26, 1954; ( Confidential - Not Published )
* Executive Order 10695-A, January 16, 1957; ( Confidential - Not Published )
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 9146

more info.
See the Notes section for a listing of Executive Orders affected by or related to the issuance of this Executive Order.
Signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt Friday, April 24, 1942
Federal Register page & date: 7 FR 3067, Tuesday, April 28, 1942
By virtue of the authority vested in me by the act of June 25, 1910, c. 421, 36 Stat. 847, and as President of the United States, I hereby authorize the Secretary of the Interior to sign all orders withdrawing or reserving public lands of the United States, and all orders revoking or modifying such orders:
    Provided, that all such orders shall have the prior approval of the Director of the Bureau of the Budget and the Attorney General, as now required with respect to proposed Executive Orders by Executive Order No. 7298 of February 18, 1936, and shall be submitted to the Division of the Federal Register for filing and publication:
    Provided, further, that no such order which affects lands under the administrative jurisdiction of any executive department or agency of the Government, other than the Department of the Interior, shall be signed by the Secretary of the Interior without the prior concurrence of the head of the department or agency concerned.

## Notes
### Superseded by

* Executive Order 9337, April 24, 1943

### See Related

* Executive Order 7298, February 18, 1936
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 915

more info.
Signed by President Theodore Roosevelt Thursday, July 16, 1908
1908 CSR 134
Mr. Herman Gluck, whose services as a deputy collector of internal revenue at New York were discontinued on March 1, 1907, may be reinstated without regard to the expiration of his year of eligibility.
The White House,
    July 16, 1908.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 916

more info.
Signed by President Theodore Roosevelt Thursday, July 16, 1908
1908 CSR 134
George Terwilliger may be reinstated in the Government Printing Office without regard to the length of his separation from the service.
The White House,
    July 16, 1908.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 917

more info.
Also see Executive Order 1329, April 4, 1911.
Signed by President Theodore Roosevelt Saturday, July 18, 1908
1908 CSR 135
Mr. William E. Shields may be reinstated in the Government Printing Office without regard to the length of his separation from the office.
The White House,
    July 18, 1908.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 919

more info.
Also see Proclamation 582, July 21, 1905, Executive Order 637, May 32, 1907, and Executive Order 970, November 13, 1908.
Signed by President Theodore Roosevelt Thursday, July 23, 1908
General Orders, No. 126, War Dept., August 19, 1908.
It is hereby ordered that the west half of the southwest quarter of section 1; the east half of the southeast quarter of section 2; the north half of the northeast quarter, the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter, and the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of section 3; the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter and lot 4 of section 10; all in township 17 south, range 13 west; and the west tier of section 6, consisting of lots 4, 5, 6 and 7 of said section, in township 17 south, range 12 west; all lying north of the military reservation of Fort Bayard, New Mexico, and within the limits of the Gila National Forest as established by Proclamation of the President of July 21, 1905, be further withdrawn from sale or other disposition, subject to private rights if any there be, for military purposes to protect the water supply of Fort Bayard: Provided, That this withdrawal for use by the War Department shall not revoke the withdrawal of the land as a part of the Gila National Forest made by the Proclamation of July 21, 1905, but both withdrawals shall stand together, the withdrawal for the War Department being the dominant one, and whenever the use of the land as a National Forest does not interfere with the protection of the water supply of Fort Bayard, such use shall not be interfered with, but the lands shall not be subject to appropriation under any of the public land laws.
The White House,
    July 23, 1908.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Franklin D. Roosevelt to Alexander Kirk (August 19, 1940)

* related portals: World War II.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Hyde Park, N. Y., August 19, 1940.
Dear Alex:-
It is good, indeed, to get your letter -- and your "evaluation" of the situation conforms to my own thinking.
You will have read of my meeting with Mackenzie King on Saturday. A complete meeting of the minds is always satisfactory and, incidentally, both the American and Canadian programs are doing well.
My best wishes to you,
Always sincerely,
Alexander Kirk, Esq., American Embassy, Berlin, Germany.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Franklin Branch Bank v. Ohio/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
66 U.S. 474
Franklin Branch Bank v. Ohio
The single question in this case is, whether the 60th section of the statute of Ohio, entitled 'An act to incorporate the State Bank of Ohio and other banking companies,' passed February 24, 1845, constitutes a contract for a fixed amount and mode of taxation; and whether the statute of Ohio, passed April 5, 1859, entitled 'An act for the assessment and taxation of all the property in this State, and for levying taxes thereon, according to its value in money,' impairs that contract.
The amount of tax due from the Franklin Branch, &c., &c., upon the basis of the 60th section, was $1,216 42 for the year 1859; the amount assessed against it, under the act of the 24th February, 1855, was $1,076 30 for the same year. The case, of course, turns upon the true construction of the 60th section; and this court has just said, in the case of the Jefferson Branch of the State Bank of Ohio, &c., vs. Skelly, (No. 143,) that the 60th section contains a contract for a fixed rule of taxation, and that the act of April 15, 1853, which attempts to assess a larger tax, by a differentrule, was unconstitutional. See also the cases of Knoop vs. Piqua Bank, (16 Howard, 369;) Dodge vs. Woolsey, (18 Howard, 331;) Mechanics and Traders' Bank vs. Debolt, (ibid., 380.) In all of these cases this court held, that the 60th section was a contract, and that the various State laws, which attempted to change the rule of taxation fixed by such contract, were void.
We affirm again the unconstitutionality of the law of Ohio under which the tax was assessed and levied against the Franklin Bank, and direct the reversal of the judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio now before us by a writ of error.
The clerk of this court will, under the direction of this court, issue the proper mandate.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Franklin D. Roosevelt draft to Winston Churchill (June 13, 1940)

* related portals: World War II.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
June 13, 1940 Source: U.S. National Archives and Records Administration
​Send to
Kennedy:
Get following to P. M. as quickly as possible but with full secrecy:
Quote I have sent following to to Reynaud Subquote etc.
I cannot send squadron to Barrhaven as we have squadron off Portugal and another visiting East Coast South America - Atlantic Patrol from Nova Scotia to Trinidad is in my judgment important as it continues to provide wide safety zone. Furthermore I think you will agree that maintenance main fleet in Hawaii is vital.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Franklin D. Roosevelt to Chief of Operations (May 26, 1941)

Layout 2
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
May 26, 1941.
MEMORANDUM FOR
       THE CHIEF OF OPERATIONS
       FOR YOUR INFORMATION AND PLEASE RETURN FOR MY FILES
                            F. D. R.
                         Many thanks-
                               Betty-
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Franklin D. Roosevelt to Cordell Hull (March, 1941)

Source: U.S. National Archives and Records Administration
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
C.H.
Just came — what do you think? Let me know in morning.
Please return for my files.
FDR
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Frankie and Johnny

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Frankie and Johnny."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
"Frankie and Johnny", also called "'Frankie and Albert", or simply "Frankie", is a traditional late 19th century ballad.
* "Frankie and Albert" (1928), by Mississippi John Hurt
* Frankie and Johnny (1928), play by Jack Kirkland
* "Frankie and Johnnie", by Jimmie Rogers
# Franklin Branch Bank v. Ohio

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
66 U.S. 474
Franklin Branch Bank v. Ohio
Writ of error to the Supreme Court of Ohio. The State of Ohio, by Mr. Walcott, her Attorney General, brought suit in the Supreme Court of Franklin county against the Franklin Branch of the State Bank of Ohio, claiming the sum of $4,076 30, as due from the bank to the State for taxes assessed pursuant to an act of the Legislature, passed 5th April, 1859. The bank pleaded that the 60th section of the charter was a contractor, by which the State bound herself to levy no other or greater taxes on the State Bank or its branches than what are stipulated for in that section, and that the act of 1859, under which the taxes claimed in this case are assessed, is void, as being a violation of the contract. The plaintiff demurred. The court gave judgment against the defendant for the sum claimed. The defendant took the case into the Supreme Court of the State, where the judgment of the county court was affirmed. There upon the bank took this writ of error.
Mr. Stanbery, of Ohio, for the plaintiff in error.
No argument was made in this court for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice WAYNE.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Franklin D. Roosevelt to Cordell Hull (July 11, 1940)

* related portals: World War II.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
July 11, 1940
MEMORANDUM FOR
    THE SECRETARY OF STATE
    For preparation of reply to Lothian.
F. D. R.
Secret letter to the President 7/9/40 from Lord Lothian, British Embassy, enclosing a copy of a telegram to the President from the Prime Minister regarding the appt. of the Duke of Windsor as Governor of the Bahamas. Th Says the Prime Minister was particularly anxious that the P. should have advance information of this appt. However due to the receipt of the message in a corrupt form and also due to leakage it was necessary to arrange for the appt. to be announced "this evening by the British Broadcasting Company."
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Framley Parsonage

Fourth book of the Chronicles of Barsetshire, first published in 1861
FRAMLEY PARSONAGE.
A Novel.
By ANTHONY TROLLOPE,
AUTHOR OF "DOCTOR THORNE," "THE BERTRAMS," "THE THREE CLERKS," &c., &c., &c.
WITH ILLUSTRATIONS.
NEW YORK:
HARPER & BROTHERS, PUBLISHERS,
FRANKLIN SQUARE.
1871.
LORD LUFTON AND LUCY ROBARTS.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fish of the Flood

As rendered in Poetry: A Magazine of Verse (October 1912):
FISH OF THE FLOOD
Fish of the flood, on the bankèd billow Thou layest thy head in dreams; Sliding as slides thy shifting pillow, One with the streams Of the sea is thy spirit.
Gean-tree, thou spreadest thy foaming flourish Abroad in the sky so grey; It not heeding if it thee nourish, Thou dost obey, Happy, its moving.
So, God, thy love it not needeth me, Only thy life, that I blessèd be.
Emilia Stuart Lorimer
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fields, Factories and Workshops

Source 1

## Contents

* Preface
* Chapter I: The Decentralisation of Industries
* Chapter II: The Decentralisation of Industries, Part 2
* Chapter III: The Possibilities of Agriculture
* Chapter IV: The Possibilities of Agriculture, Part 2
* Chapter V: The Possibilities of Agriculture, Part 3
* Chapter VI: Small Industries and Industrial Villages
* Chapter VII: Small Industries and Industrial Villages, Part 2
* Chapter VIII: Brain Work and Manual Work
* Chapter IX: Conclusion
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fielding (Dobson)/Appendix 3

​APPENDIX No. III. AMELIA’S ACCIDENT.
In addition to the alterations mentioned at p. 109 n., Fielding inserted the following paragraph in the Covent-Garden Journal, No. 3, for 11th January 1752:—
“It is currently reported that a famous Surgeon, who absolutely cured one Mrs. Amelia Booth, of a violent Hurt in her Nose, insomuch, that she had scarce a Scar left on it, intends to bring Actions against several ill-meaning and slanderous People, who have reported that the said Lady had no Nose, merely because the Author of her History, in a Hurry, forgot to inform his Readers of that Particular, and which, if those Readers had any Nose themselves, except that which is mentioned in the Motto of this Paper, they would have smelt out.”
The motto is the passage from Martial (Ep. i. 4. 6) in which he speaks of the nasus rhinocerotis.
# General Baking Company v. Goldblatt Bros

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 732
General Baking Company v. Goldblatt Bros
Mr. Frederic P. Warfield, of New York City, for petitioner.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# General Baking Company v. Harr

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "General Baking Company v. Harr."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* General Baking Company v. Harr (300 U.S. 433)
* General Baking Company v. Harr (302 U.S. 761)
# General Baking Company v. Harr (300 U.S. 433)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
300 U.S. 433
General Baking Company v. Harr
Argued: March 5, 1937. --- Decided: March 29, 1937
Mr. George E. Beechwood, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.
Mr. Joseph S.C.lark, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# General Baking Company v. Goldblatt Bros/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 732
General Baking Company v. Goldblatt Bros
For opinion below, see 90 F.(2d) 241.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# General Baking Company v. Harr (300 U.S. 433)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
300 U.S. 433
General Baking Company v. Harr
Argued: March 5, 1937. --- Decided: March 29, 1937
Acting under Pennsylvania statutes (7 P.S.Pa. § 1 et seq.), October 5, 1931, William D. Gordon, Secretary of Banking (respondent Herr is his successor), closed the Franklin Trust Company, a banking institution in Philadelphia, and took control of its business and assets.
Thereafter in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, petitioner, a New York corporation, presented a bill against Gordon, setting up an agreement by which it undertook to keep on deposit with the Trust Company a sum specified, and the latter undertook either directly or through correspondent banks to accept deposits of cash, checks, etc., and to forward the proceeds therefrom to petitioner in New York. Also that when closed the Trust Company had in its assets $49,590.17 received under this agreement, and its correspondent banks had on hand deposits likewise acquired amounting to $32,403.26.
The bill prayed for a decree declaring petitioner owner of the $32,403.26 and that a trust existed in its favor in respect of the $49,590.17 deposit; also for general relief. The answer suggested some qualifications of the alleged agreement and denied that there was no adequate remedy at law. Otherwise, the allegations of the bill were generally admitted.
The District Court took jurisdiction of the controversy; held petitioner was not owner of the $32,403.26; also that no ground existed for impressing a trust upon assets because of the $49,590.17 deposit; and dismissed the bill. 9 F.Supp. 210.
The Circuit Court of Appeals concluded the District Court had no jurisdiction and should have dismissed the bill without adjudicating other questions. 85 F. (2d) 932. It accordingly approved the dismissal but directed that the cause be referred to the state court for proper procedure there.
Although entered in September, 1936, the opinion below does not refer to Commonwealth Trust Company of Pittsburgh et al. v. Bradford, Receiver, 297 U.S. 613, 5l S.Ct. 600, 80 L.Ed. 920, decided here March 30, 1936. Nothing indicates that this opinion was brought to the Court's attention. The doctrine there approved, we think, is decisive of the issue concerning jurisdiction now presented.
It was error for the Circuit Court of Appeals to hold that the District Court was without jurisdiction of the controversy. It should have passed on issues properly presented upon the appeal.
The questioned decree must be reversed and the matter remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals for further proceedings.
Reversed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# General Baking Company v. Harr (302 U.S. 761)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 761
General Baking Company v. Harr
Mr. George E. Beechwood, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse