# A discourse upon the origin and foundation of the inequality among mankind/First Part

Discourse.
First Part.
However important it may be, in order to form a proper Judgment of the natural State of Man, to consider him from his Origin, and to examine him, as it were, in the first Embryo of the Species; I shall not attempt to trace his Organization thro' its successive Approaches to Perfection: I shall not stop to examine in the animal System what he might have been in the beginning, to become at last what he actually is; I shall not inquire, whether, as Aristotle thinks, his neglected Nails were no better at first than crooked Talons; whether his whole Body was not, Bear like, thick covered with rough Hair; and whether, walking upon all-fours, (3) his Eyes directed to the Earth, and confined to a ​Horizon of a few Paces Extent, did not at once point out the Nature and Limits of his Ideas. I could only form vague, and almost imaginary, Conjectures on this Subject. Comparative Anatomy has not as yet been sufficiently improved; neither have the Observations of Natural Philosophy been sufficiently ascertained, to establish upon such Foundations the Basis of a solid System. For this Reason, without having recourse to the supernatural Informations with which we have been favoured on this Head, or paying any Attention to the Changes, that must have happened in the Conformation of the interior and exterior Parts of Man's Body, in proportion as he applied his Members to new Purposes, and took to new Aliments, I shall suppose his Conformation to have always been, what we now behold it; that he always walked on two Feet, made the same use of his Hands that we do of ours, extended his looks over the whole ​Face of Nature, and measured with his Eyes the vast Extent of the Heavens.
If I strip this Being, thus constituted, of all the supernatural Gifts which he may have received, and of all the artificial Faculties, which he could not have acquired but by slow Degrees; if I consider him, in a word, such as he must have issued from the Hands of Nature; I see an Animal less strong than some, and less active than others, but, upon the whole, the most advantageously organized of any: I see him satisfying the calls of Hunger under the first Oak, and those of Thirst at the first Rivulet; I see him laying himself down to sleep at the Foot of the same Tree, that afforded him his Meal; and behold, this done, all his Wants are completely supplied.
The Earth left to its own natural Fertility (4) and covered with immense Woods, that ​no Hatchet ever disfigured, offers at every Step Food and Shelter to every Species of Animals. Men, dispersed among them, observe and imitate their Industry, and thus rise to the instinct of Beasts; with this Advantage, that, whereas every Species of Beasts is confined to one peculiar Instinct, Man, who perhaps has not any that particularly belongs to him, appropriates to himself those of all other Animals, and lives equally upon most of the different Aliments, (5) which they only divide among themselves; a circumstance which qualifies him to find his Subsistence, with more Ease than any of them.
Men, accustomed from their Infancy to the Inclemency of the Weather, and to the Rigour of the different Seasons; inured to Fatigue, and obliged to defend, naked and without Arms, their Life and their Prey against the other wild Inhabitants of the Forest, or at least to avoid their ​Fury by flight, acquire a robust and almost unalterable Habit of Body; the Children, bringing with them into the World the excellent Constitution of their Parents, and strengthening it by the same Exercises that first produced it, attain by this Means all the Vigour that the human Frame is capable of. Nature treats them exactly in the same Manner that Sparta treated the Children of her Citizens; those who come well formed into the World she renders strong and robust, and destroys all the rest; differing in this Respect from our Societies, in which the State, by permitting Children to become burthensome to their Parents, murders them all without Distinction, even in the Wombs of their Mothers.
The Body, being the only Instrument that savage Man is acquainted with, he employs it to different Uses, of which ours, for Want of Practice, are ​incapable; and we may thank our Industry for the loss of that Strength and Agility, which Necessity obliges him to acquire. Had he a Hatchet, would his Hand so easily snap off from an Oak so stout a Branch? Had he a Sling, would it dart a Stone to so great a Distance? Had he a Ladder, would he run so nimbly up a Tree? Had he a Horse, would he with such Swiftness shoot along the Plain? Give civilized Man but Time to gather about him all his Machines, and no doubt he will be an Overmatch for the Savage: but if you have a mind to see a Contest still more unequal, place them naked and unarmed one opposite to the other; and you will soon discover the Advantage there is in perpetually having all our Forces at our Disposal, in being constantly prepared against all Events, and in always carrying ourselves, as it were, whole and entire about us. (6)
Hobbes would have it that Man is ​naturally void of fear, and always intent upon attacking and fighting. An illustrious Philosopher thinks on the contrary, and Cumberland and Puffendorff likewise affirm it, that nothing is more fearful than Man in a State of Nature, that he is always in a tremble, and ready to fly at the first Motion he perceives, at the first Noise that strikes his Ears. This, indeed, may be very true in regard to Objects with which he is not acquainted; and I make no doubt of his being terrified at every new Sight that presents itself, as often as he cannot distinguish the Physical Good and Evil which he may expect from it, nor compare his Forces with the Dangers he has to encounter; Circumstances, that seldom occur in a State of Nature, where all Things proceed in so uniform a Manner, and the Face of the Earth is not liable to those sudden and continual Changes occasioned in it by the Passions and Inconstancies of collected Bodies. But ​savage Man living among other Animals without any Society or fixed Habitation, and finding himself early under a Necessity of measuring his Strength with theirs, soon makes a Comparison between both, and finding that he surpasses them more in Address, than they surpass him in Strength, he learns not to be any longer in dread of them. Turn out a Bear or a Wolf against a sturdy, active, resolute Savage, (and this they all are,) provided with Stones and a good Stick; and you will soon find that the Danger is at least equal on both Sides, and that after several Trials of this Kind, wild Beasts, who are not fond of attacking each other, will not be very fond of attacking Man, whom they have found every whit as wild as themselves. As to Animals who have really more Strength than Man has Address, he is, in regard to them, what other weaker Species are, who find Means to subsist ​notwithstanding; he has even this great Advantage over such weaker Species, that being equally fleet with them, and finding on every Tree an almost inviolable Asylum, he is always at liberty to take it or leave it, as he likes best, and of course to fight or to fly, whichever is most agreeable to him. To this we may add that no Animal naturally makes war upon Man, except in the Case of Self-defence or extreme Hunger; nor ever expresses against him any of these violent Antipathies, which seem to indicate that some particular Species are intended by Nature for the Food of others.
But there are other more formidable Enemies, and against which Man is not provided with the same Means of Defence; I mean natural Infirmities, Infancy, old Age, and Sickness of every Kind; melancholy Proofs of our ​Weakness, whereof the two first are common to all Animals, and the last chiefly attends Man living in a State of Society. It is even observable in regard to Infancy, that the Mother being able to carry her Child about with her, wherever she goes, can perform the Duty of a Nurse with a great deal less Trouble, than the Females of many other Animals, who are obliged to be constantly going and coming with no small Labour and Fatigue, one Way to look out for their own Subsistence, and another to suckle and feed their young ones. True it is that, if the Woman happens to perish, her Child is exposed to the greatest Danger of perishing with her; but this Danger is common to a hundred other Species, whose young ones require a great deal of Time to be able to provide for themselves; and if our Infancy is longer than theirs, our Life is longer likewise; so that, in this respect too, all Things are ​in a manner equal; (7) not but that there are other Rules concerning the Duration of the first Age of Life, and the Number of the young of Man and other Animals, (8) but they do not belong to my Subject. With old Men, who stir and perspire but little, the Demand for Food diminishes with their Abilities to provide it; and as a savage Life would exempt them from the Gout and the Rheumatism, and old Age is of all Ills that which human Assistance is least capable of alleviating, they would at last go off, without its being perceived by others that they ceased to exist, and almost without perceiving it themselves.
In regard to Sickness, I shall not repeat the vain and false Declamations made use of to discredit Medicine by most Men, while they enjoy their Health; I shall only ask if there are any solid Observations from which we may conclude that ​in those Countries, where the healing Art is most neglected, the mean Duration of Man's Life is shorter than in those, where it is most cultivated? And how is it possible this should be the Case, if we inflict more Diseases upon ourselves than Medicine can supply us with Remedies! The extreme Inequalities in the Manner of Living of the several Classes of Mankind, the Excess of Idleness in some, and of Labour in others, the Facility of irritating and satisfying our Sensuality and our Appetites, the too exquisite and out of the way Aliments of the Rich, which fill them with fiery Juices, and bring on Indigestions, the unwholesome Food of the Poor, of which even, bad as it is, they very often fall short, and the want of which tempts them, every Opportunity that offers, to eat greedily and overload their Stomachs; Watchings, Excesses of every Kind, immoderate Transports of all the Passions, Fatigues, Waste of Spirits, in a ​word, the numberless Pains and Anxieties annexed to every Condition, and which the Mind of Man is constantly a Prey to; these are the fatal Proofs that most of our Ills are of our own making, and that we might have avoided them all by adhering to the simple, uniform and solitary Way of Life prescribed to us by Nature. Allowing that Nature intended we should always enjoy good Health, I dare almost affirm that a State of Reflection is a State against Nature, and that the Man who meditates is a depraved Animal. We need only call to mind the good Constitution of Savages, of those at least whom we have not destroyed by our strong Liquors; we need only reflect, that they are Strangers to almost every Disease, except those occasioned by Wounds and old Age, to be in a manner convinced that the History of human Diseases might be easily composed by pursuing that of civil Societies. Such at least was the Opinion of Plato, who ​concluded from certain Remedies made use of or approved by Podalyrus and Macaon at the Siege of Troy, that several Disorders, which these Remedies were found to bring on in his Days, were not known among Men at that remote Period.
Man therefore, in a State of Nature where there are so few Sources of Sickness, can have no great Occasion for Physic, and still less for Physicians; neither is the Human Species more to be pitied in this Respect, than any other Species of Animals. Ask those who make Hunting their Recreation or Business, if in their Excursions they meet with many sick or feeble Animals. They meet with many carrying the Marks of considerable Wounds, that have been perfectly well healed and closed up; with many, whose Bones formerly broken, and whose Limbs almost torn off, have completely knit and united, ​without any other Surgeon but Time, any other Regimen but their usual way of Living, and whose Cures were not the less perfect for their not having been tortured with Incisions, poisoned with Drugs, or worn out by Diet and Abstinence. In a word, however useful Medicine well administered may be to us who live in a State of Society, it is still past Doubt, that if, on the one hand, the sick Savage, destitute of Help, has nothing to hope from Nature, on the other, he has nothing to fear but from his Disease; a Circumstance, which often renders his Situation preferable to ours.
Let us therefore beware of confounding savage Man with the Men, whom we daily see and converse with. Nature behaves towards all Animals left to her Care with a Predilection, that seems to prove how jealous she is of that Prerogative. The ​Horse, the Cat, the Bull, nay the Ass itself, have generally a higher Stature, and always a more robust Constitution, more Vigour, more Strength and Courage in their Forests than in our Houses; they lose half these Advantages by becoming domestic Animals; it looks as if all our Attention to treat them kindly, and to feed them well, served only to bastardize them. It is thus with Man himself. In proportion as he becomes sociable and a Slave to others, he becomes weak, fearful, mean-spirited, and his soft and effeminate Way of Living at once completes the Enervation of his Strength and of his Courage. We may add, that there must be still a wider Difference between Man and Man in a savage and domestic Condition, than between Beast and Beast; for as Men and Beasts have been treated alike by Nature, all the Conveniencies with which Men ​indulge themselves more than they do the Beasts tamed by them, are so many particular Causes which make them degenerate more sensibly.
Nakedness therefore, the want of Houses, and of all these Unnecessaries, which we consider as so very necessary, are not such mighty Evils in respect to these primitive Men, and much less still any Obstacle to their Preservation. Their Skins, it is true, are destitute of Hair; but then they have no Occasion for any such Covering in warm Climates; and in cold Climates they soon learn to apply to that Use those of the Animals they have conquered; they have but two Feet to run with, but they have two Hands to defend themselves with, and provide for all their Wants; it costs them perhaps a great deal of Time and Trouble to make their Children walk, but the Mothers carry them with Ease; an Advantage not granted to other Species of Animals, ​with whom the Mother, when pursued, is obliged to abandon her young ones, or regulate her Steps by theirs. In short, unless we admit those singular and fortuitous Concurrences of Circumstances, which I shall speak of hereafter, and which, it is very possible, may never have existed, it is evident, in every State of the Question, that the Man, who first made himself Clothes and built himself a Cabbin, supplied himself with Things which he did not much want, since he had lived without them till then; and why should he not have been able to support in his riper Years, the same kind of Life, which he had supported from his Infancy?
Alone, idle, and always surrounded with Danger, savage Man must be fond of Sleep, and sleep lightly like other Animals, who think but little, and may, in a manner, be said to sleep all the Time they do not think: Self-preservation ​being almost his only Concern, he must exercise those Faculties most, which are most serviceable in attacking and in defending, whether to subdue his Prey, or to prevent his becoming that of other Animals: those Organs, on the contrary, which Softness and Sensuality can alone improve, must remain in a State of Rudeness, utterly incompatible with all manner of Delicacy; and as his Senses are divided on this Point, his Touch and his Taste must be extremely coarse and blunt; his Sight, his Hearing, and his Smelling equally subtile: such is the animal State in general, and accordingly, if we may believe Travellers, it is that of most Savage Nations. We must not therefore be surprised, that the Hottentots of the Cape of Good Hope, distinguish with their naked Eyes Ships on the Ocean, at as great a Distance as the Dutch can discern them with their Glasses; nor that the Savages of America should have tracked the Spaniards ​with their Noses, to as great a Degree of Exactness, as the best Dogs could have done; nor that all these barbarous Nations support Nakedness without Pain, use such large Quantities of Piemento to give their Food a Relish, and drink like Water the strongest Liquors of Europe.
As yet I have considered Man merely in his Physical Capacity; let us now endeavour to examine him in a Metaphysical and Moral Light.
I can discover nothing in any mere Animal but an ingenious Machine, to which Nature has given Senses to wind itself up, and guard, to a certain Degree, against every thing that might destroy or disorder it. I perceive the very same things in the Human Machine, with this Difference, that Nature alone operates in all the Operations of the Beast, whereas Man, as a free Agent, has a Share in his. One chuses by instinct; the other by an act of ​Liberty; for which Reason the Beast cannot deviate from the Rules that have been prescribed to it, even in Cases where such Deviation might be useful, and Man often deviates from the Rules laid down for him to his Prejudice. Thus a Pigeon would starve near a Dish of the best Flesh-meat, and a Cat on a Heap of Fruit or Corn, tho' both might very well support Life with the Food which they thus disdain, did they but bethink themselves to make a Trial of it: it is in this manner that dissolute Men run into Excesses, which bring on Fevers and Death itself; because the Mind depraves the Senses, and when Nature ceases to speak, the Will still continues to dictate.
All Animals must be allowed to have Ideas, since all Animals have Senses; they even combine their Ideas to a certain Degree, and, in this Respect, it is only the Difference of such Degree, that constitutes the ​Difference between Man and Beast: some Philosophers have even advanced, that there is a greater Difference between some Men and some others, than between some Men and some Beasts; it is not therefore so much the Understanding that constitutes, among Animals, the specifical Distinction of Man, as his Quality of a free Agent. Nature speaks to all Animals, and Beasts obey her Voice. Man feels the same Impression, but he at the same time perceives that he is free to resist or to acquiesce; and it is in the Consciousness of this Liberty, that the Spirituality of his Soul chiefly appears: for Natural Philosophy explains, in some measure, the Mechanism of the Senses and the Formation of Ideas; but in the Power of willing, or rather of chusing, and in the Consciousness of this Power, nothing can be discovered but Acts, that are purely spiritual, and cannot be accounted for by the Laws of Mechanics.
​But tho' the Difficulties, in which all these Questions are involved, should leave some Room to dispute on this Difference between Man and Beast, there is another very specifick Quality that distinguishes them, and a Quality which will admit of no Dispute; this is the Faculty of Improvement; a Faculty which, as Circumstances offer, successively unfolds all the other Faculties, and resides among us not only in the Species, but in the Individuals that compose it; whereas a Beast is, at the end of some Months, all he ever will be during the rest of his Life; and his Species, at the End of a thousand Years, precisely what it was the first Year of that long Period. Why is Man alone subject to Dotage? Is it not, because he thus returns to his primitive Condition? And because, while the Beast, which has acquired nothing and has likewise nothing to lose, continues always in Possession of his ​Instinct, Man, losing by old Age, or by Accidents, all the Acquisitions he had made in consequence of his Perfectibility, thus falls back even lower than Beasts themselves? It would be a melancholy Necessity for us to be obliged to allow, that this distinctive and almost unlimited Faculty is the Source of all Man's Misfortunes; that it is this Faculty, which, tho' by slow Degrees, draws them out of their original Condition, in which his Days would slide away insensibly in Peace and Innocence; that it is this Faculty, which, in a Succession of Ages, produces his Discoveries and Mistakes, his Virtues and his Vices, and, at long run, renders him both his own and Nature's Tyrant. (9) It would be shocking to be obliged to commend, as a beneficent Being, whoever he was that first suggested to the Orenoco Indians the Use of those Boards which they bind on the Temples of their Children, and which ​secure to them the Enjoyment of some Part at least of their natural Imbecility and Happiness.
Savage Man, abandoned by Nature to pure Instinct, or rather indemnified for that which has perhaps been denied to him by Faculties capable of immediately supplying the place of it, and of raising him afterwards a great deal higher, would therefore begin with Functions that were merely Animal: (10) to see and to feel would be his first Condition, which he would enjoy in common with other Animals. To will and not to will, to wish and to fear, would be the first, and in a manner, the only Operations of his Soul, till new Circumstances occasioned new Developments.
Let Moralists say what they will, the Human Understanding is greatly indebted to the Passions, which, on their Side, are ​likewise universally allowed to be greatly indebted to the Human Understanding. It is by the Activity of our Passions, that our Reason improves; we covet Knowledge merely because we covet Enjoyment, and it is impossible to conceive, why a Man exempt from Fears and Desires should take the Trouble to reason. The Passions, in their turn, owe their Origin to our Wants, and their Increase to our Progress in Science; for we cannot desire or fear any Thing, but in consequence of the Ideas we have of it, or of the simple Impulses of Nature; and Savage Man, destitute of every Species of Knowledge, experiences no Passions but those of this last Kind; his Desires never extend beyond his Physical Wants; (11) He knows no Goods but Food, a Female, and Rest; he fears no Evils but Pain, and Hunger; I say Pain, and not Death; for no Animal, merely as such, will ever know ​what it is to die, and the Knowledge of Death, and of its Terrors, is one of the first Acquisitions made by Man, in consequence of his deviating from the Animal State.
I could easily, were it requisite, cite Facts in support of this Opinion, and show, that the Progress of the Mind has every where kept Pace exactly with the Wants, to which Nature had left the Inhabitants exposed, or to which Circumstances had subjected them, and consequently to the Passions, which inclined them to provide for these Wants. I could exhibit in Ægypt the Arts starting up, and extending themselves with the Inundations of the Nile; I could pursue them in their Progress among the Greeks, where they were seen to bud forth, grow, and rise to the Heavens, in the midst of the Sands and Rocks of Attica, without being able to take Root on the fertile ​Banks of the Eurotas; I would observe, that, in general, the Inhabitants of the North are more Industrious than those of the South, because they can less do without Industry; as if Nature thus meant to make all Things equal, by giving to the Mind that Fertility she has denied to the Soil.
But exclusive of the uncertain Testimonies of History, who does not perceive that every thing seems to remove from Savage Man the Temptation and the Means of altering his Condition? His Imagination paints nothing to him; his Heart asks nothing from him. His moderate Wants are so easily supplied with what he every where finds ready to his Hand, and he stands at such a Distance from the Degree of Knowledge requisite to covet more, that he can neither have Foresight or Curiosity. The Spectacle of Nature, by growing quite ​familiar to him, becomes at last equally indifferent. It is constantly the same Order, constantly the same Revolutions; he has not Sense enough to feel surprise at the Sight of the greatest Wonders; and it is not in his Mind we must look for that Philosophy, which Man must have to know how to observe once, what he has every Day seen. His Soul, which nothing disturbs, gives itself up entirely to the Consciousness of its actual Existence, without any Thought of even the nearest Futurity; and his Projects, equally confined with his Views, scarce extend to the end of the Day. Such is, even at present, the Degree of Foresight in the Carribean: he sells his Cotton Bed in the Morning, and comes in the Evening, with Tears in his Eyes, to buy it back, not having foreseen that he should want it again the next Night.
The more we meditate on this Subject, the wider does the Distance between ​mere Sensation and the most simple Knowledge become in our Eyes; and it is impossible to conceive how Man, by his own Powers alone, without the Assistance of Communication, and the Spur of Necessity, could have got over so great an Interval. How many Ages perhaps revolved, before Men beheld any other Fire but that of the Heavens? How many different Accidents must have concurred to make them acquainted with the most common Uses of this Element? How often have they let it go out, before they knew the Art of reproducing it? And how often perhaps has not every one of these Secrets perished with the Discoverer? What shall we say of Agriculture, an Art which requires so much Labour and Foresight; which depends upon other Arts; which, it is very evident, cannot be practised but in a Society, if not a formed one, at least one of some standing, and which does not so much serve to draw ​Aliments from the Earth, for the Earth would yield them without all that Trouble, as to oblige her to produce those things, which we like best, preferably to others? But let us suppose that Men had multiplied to such a Degree, that the natural Products of the Earth no longer sufficed for their Support; a Supposition which, by the bye, would prove that this Kind of Life would be very advantageous to the Human Species; let us suppose that, without Forge or Anvil, the Instruments of Husbandry had dropt from the Heavens into the Hands of Savages, that these Men had got the better of that mortal Aversion they all have for constant Labour; that they had learned to foretell their Wants at so great a Distance of Time; that they had guessed exactly how they were to break the Earth, commit their Seed to it, and plant Trees; that they had found out the Art of grinding their Corn, and improving by Fermentation the Juice of their ​Grapes; all Operations which we must allow them to have learned from the Gods, since we cannot conceive how they should make such Discoveries of themselves; after all these fine Presents, what Man would be mad enough to cultivate a Field, that may be robbed by the first Comer, Man or Beast, who takes a fancy to the Produce of it. And would any Man consent to spend his Days in Labour and Fatigue, when the Rewards of his Labour and Fatigue became more and more precarious in Proportion to his Want of them? In a word, how could this Situation engage Men to cultivate the Earth, as long as it was not parcelled out among them, that is, as long as a State of Nature subsisted.
Tho' we should suppose Savage Man as well versed in the Art of Thinking, as Philosophers make him; tho' we were, after them, to make him a Philosopher himself, discovering of himself the ​sublimest Truths, forming to himself, by the most abstract Arguments, Maxims of Justice and Reason drawn from the Love of Order in general, or from the known Will of his Creator: In a word, tho' we were to suppose his Mind as intelligent and enlightened, as it must, and is, in fact, found to be dull and stupid; what Benefit would the Species receive from all these Metaphysical Discoveries, which could not be communicated, but must perish with the Individual who had made them? What Progress could Mankind make in the Forests, scattered up and down among the other Animals? And to what degree could Men mutually improve and enlighten each other, when they had no fixed Habitation, nor any need of each other's Assistance; when the same Persons scarcely met twice in their whole Lives, and on meeting neither spake to, or so much as knew each other.
​Let us consider how many Ideas we owe to the Use of Speech; how much Grammar exercises, and facilitates the Operations of the Mind; let us, besides, reflect on the immense Pains and Time that the first Invention of Languages must have required: Let us add these Reflections to the preceding; and then we may judge how many thousand Ages must have been requisite to develop successively the Operations, which the Human Mind is capable of producing.
I must now beg leave to stop one Moment to consider the Perplexities attending the Origin of Languages. I might here barely cite or repeat the Researches made, in relation to this Question, by the Abbé de Condillac, which all fully confirm my System, and perhaps even suggested to me the first Idea of it. But, as the manner, in which this Philosopher resolves the Difficulties of his own Starting, concerning ​the Origin of arbitrary Signs, shews that he supposes, what I doubt, namely a kind of Society already established among the Inventors of Languages; I think it my Duty, at the same time that I refer to his Reflections, to give my own, in order to expose the same Difficulties in a Light suitable to my Subject. The first that offers is how Languages could become necessary; for as there was no Correspondence between Men, nor the least Necessity for any, there is no conceiving the Necessity of this Invention, nor the Possibility of it, if it was not indispensible. I might say, with many others, that Languages are the Fruit of the Domestic Intercourse between Fathers, Mothers, and Children: but this, besides its not answering any Difficulties, would be committing the same Fault with those, who reasoning on the State of Nature, transfer to it Ideas collected in Society, always consider Families as living together under one Roof, ​and their Members as observing among themselves an Union, equally intimate and permanent with that which we see exist in a Civil State, where so many common Interests conspire to unite them; whereas in this primitive State, as there were neither Houses nor Cabbins, nor any kind of Property, every one took up his Lodging at random, and seldom continued above one Night in the same Place; Males and Females united without any premeditated Design, as Chance, Occasion, or Desire brought them together, nor had they any great Occasion for Language to make known their Thoughts to each other. They parted with the same Ease. (12) The Mother suckled her Children, when just born, for her own sake; but afterwards out of Love and Affection to them, when Habit and Custom had made them dear to her; but they no sooner gained Strength enough to run about in quest of Food than they separated even from her of ​their own accord; and as they scarce had any other Method of not losing each other, than that of remaining constantly in each other's Sight, they soon came to such a pass of Forgetfulness, as not even to know each other, when they happened to meet again. I must further observe, that the Child having all his Wants to explain, and consequently more things to say to his Mother, than the Mother can have to say to him, it is he that must be at the chief Expence of Invention, and the Language he makes use of must be in a great measure his own Work; this makes the Number of Languages equal to that of the Individuals who are to speak them; and this Multiplicity of Languages is further increased by their roving and vagabond kind of Life, which allows no Idiom time enough to acquire any Consistency; for to say that the Mother would have dictated to the Child the Words he must employ to ask her ​this thing and that, may well enough explain in what manner Languages, already formed, are taught, but it does not shew us in what manner they are first formed.
Let us suppose this first Difficulty conquered: Let us for a Moment consider ourselves at this Side of the immense Space, which must have separated the pure State of Nature from that in which Languages became necessary, and let us, after allowing such Necessity (13) examine how Languages could begin to be established: A new Difficulty this, still more stubborn than the preceding; for if Men stood in need of Speech to learn to think, they must have stood in still greater need of the Art of thinking to invent that of speaking; and tho' we could conceive how the Sounds of the Voice came to be taken for the conventional Interpreters of our Ideas we should not be the nearer ​knowing who could have been the Interpreters of this Convention for such Ideas, as, in consequence of their not having any sensible Objects, could not be made manifest by Gesture or Voice; so that we can scarce form any tolerable Conjectures concerning the Birth of this Art of communicating our Thoughts, and establishing a Correspondence between Minds: A sublime Art which, tho' so remote from its Origin, Philosophers still behold at such a prodigious Distance from its Perfection, that I never met with one of them bold enough to affirm it would ever arrive there, tho' the Revolutions necessarily produced by Time were suspended in its Favour; tho' Prejudice could be banished from, or would at least consent to sit silent in the Presence of our Academies; and tho' these Societies should consecrate themselves, entirely and during whole Ages, to the Study of this intricate Object.
​The first Language of Man, the most universal and most energetic of all Languages, in short, the only Language he had Occasion for, before there was a Necessity of persuading assembled Multitudes, was the Cry of Nature. As this Cry was never extorted but by a Kind of Instinct in the most urgent Cases, to implore Assistance in great Danger, or Relief in great Sufferings, it was of little use in the common Occurrences of Life, where more moderate Sentiments generally prevail. When the Ideas of Men began to extend and multiply, and a closer Communication began to take place among them, they laboured to devise more numerous Signs, and a more extensive Language: they multiplied the Inflections of the Voice, and added to them Gestures, which are, in their own Nature, more expressive, and whose Meaning depends less on any prior Determination. They therefore expressed visible and moveable ​Objects by Gestures, and those which strike the Ear, by imitative Sounds: but as Gestures scarcely indicate any thing except Objects that are actually present or can be easily described, and visible Actions; as they are not of general Use, since Darkness or the Interposition of an opake Medium renders them useless; and as besides they require Attention rather than excite it: Men at length bethought themselves of substituting to them the Articulations of Voice, which, without having the same Relation to any determinate Object, are, in quality of instituted Signs, fitter to represent all our Ideas; a Substitution, which could only have been made by common Consent, and in a Manner pretty difficult to practise by Men, whose rude Organs were unimproved by Exercise; a Substitution, which is in itself still more difficult to be conceived, since the Motives to this unanimous Agreement must have been some how or another expressed, ​and Speech therefore appears to have been exceedingly requisite to establish the use of Speech.
We must allow, that the Words, first made use of by Men, had in their Minds a much more extensive Signification, than those employed in Languages of some standing, and that, considering how ignorant they were of the Division of Speech into its constituent Parts; they at first gave every Word the meaning of an entire Proposition. When afterwards they began to perceive the Difference between the Subject and Attribute, and between Verb and Noun, a Distinction which required no mean Effort of Genius, the Substantives for a time were only so many proper Names, the Infinitive was the only Tense, and as to Adjectives, great Difficulties must have attended the Development of the Idea that represents them, since every ​Adjective is an abstract Word, and Abstraction is an unnatural and very painful Operation.
At first they gave every Object a peculiar Name, without any regard to its Genus or Species, things which these first Institutors of Language were in no Condition to distinguish; and every Individual presented itself solitary to their Minds, as it stands in the Table of Nature. If they called one Oak A, they called another Oak B: so that their Dictionary must have been more extensive in Proportion as their Knowledge of Things was more confined. It could not but be a very difficult Task to get rid of so diffuse and embarrassing a Nomenclature; as in order to marshal the several Beings under common and generic Denominations, it was necessary to be first acquainted with their Properties, and their Differences; to be stocked with ​Observations and Definitions, that is to say, to understand Natural History and Metaphysics, Advantages which the Men of these Times could not have enjoyed.
Besides, general Ideas cannot be conveyed to the Mind without the Assistance of Words, nor can the Understanding seize them without the Assistance of Propositions. This is one of the Reasons, why mere Animals cannot form such Ideas, nor ever acquire the Perfectibility, which depends on such an Operation. When a Monkey leaves without the least Hesitation one Nut for another, are we to think he has any general Idea of that kind of Fruit, and that he compares these two individual Bodies with his Archetype Notion of them? No certainly; but the sight of one of these Nuts calls back to his Memory the Sensations which he has received from the other; and his Eyes, modified after some certain manner, give ​Notice to his Palate of the Modification it is in its turn going to receive. Every general Idea is purely intellectual; let the Imagination tamper ever so little with it, it immediately becomes a particular Idea. Endeavour to represent to yourself the Image of a Tree in general, you never will be able to do it; in spite of all your Efforts it will appear big or little, thin or tufted, of a bright or a deep Colour; and were you Master to see nothing in it, but what can be seen in every Tree, such a Picture would no longer resemble any Tree. Beings perfectly abstract are perceiveable in the same manner, or are only conceivable by the Assistance of Speech. The Definition of a Triangle can alone give you a just Idea of that Figure: the Moment ⟨you⟩ form a Triangle in your Mind, it is this or that particular Triangle and no other, and you cannot avoid giving Breadth to its Lines and Colour to its Area. We ​must therefore make use of Propositions; we must therefore speak to have general Ideas; for the Moment the Imagination stops, the Mind must stop too, if not assisted by Speech. If therefore the first Inventors could give no Names to any Ideas but those they had already, it follows that the first Substantives could never have been any thing more than proper Names.
But when by Means, which I cannot conceive, our new Grammarians began to extend their Ideas, and generalize their Words, the Ignorance of the Inventors must have confined this Method to very narrow Bounds; and as they had at first too much multiplied the Names of Individuals for want of being acquainted with the Distinctions called Genus and Species, they afterwards made too few Genera and Species for want of having considered Beings in all their Differences: to push ​the Divisions far enough, they must have had more Knowledge and Experience than we can allow them, and have made more Researches and taken more Pains, than we can suppose them willing to submit to. Now if, even at this present time, we every Day discover new Species, which had before escaped all our Observations, how many Species must have escaped the Notice of Men, who judged of Things merely from their first Appearances! As to the primitive Classes and the most general Notions, it were superfluous to add that these they must have likewise overlooked: how, for Example, could they have thought of or understood the Words, Matter, Spirit, Substance, Mode, Figure, Motion, since even our Philosophers, who for so long a time have been constantly employing these Terms, can themselves scarcely understand them, and since the Ideas ​annexed to these Words being purely Metaphysical, no Models of them could be found in Nature?
I stop at these first Advances, and beseech my Judges to suspend their Lecture a little, in order to consider, what a great Way Language has still to go, in regard to the Invention of Physical Substantives alone, (tho' the easiest Part of Language to invent,) to be able to express all the Sentiments of Man, to assume an invariable form, to bear being spoken in public, and to influence Society: I earnestly entreat them to consider how much Time and Knowledge must have been requisite to find out Numbers, abstract Words, (14) the Aorists, and all the other Tenses of Verbs, the Particles, and Syntax, the Method of connecting Propositions and Arguments, of forming all the Logic of Discourse. For ​my own Part, I am so scared at the Difficulties that multiply at every Step, and so convinced of the almost demonstrated Impossibility of Languages owing their Birth and Establishment to Means that were merely human, that I must leave to whoever may please to take it up, the Task of discussing this difficult Problem, "Which was the most necessary, Society already formed to invent Languages, or Languages already invented to form Society?"
But be the Case of these Origins ever so mysterious, we may at least infer from the little care which Nature has taken to bring Men together by mutual Wants, and make the use of Speech easy to them, how little she has done towards making them sociable, and how little she has contributed to any thing which they themselves have done to become so. In fact, it is impossible to conceive, ​why, in this primitive State, one Man should have more Occasion for the Assistance of another, than one Monkey, or one Wolf for that of another Animal of the same Species; or supposing that he had, what Motive could induce another to assist him; or even, in this last Case, how he, who wanted Assistance, and he from whom it was wanted, could agree among themselves upon the Conditions. Authors, I know, are continually telling us, that in this State Man would have been a most miserable Creature; and if it is true, as I fancy I have proved it, that he must have continued many Ages without either the Desire or the Opportunity of emerging from such a State, this their Assertion could only serve to justify a Charge against Nature, and not any against the Being which Nature had thus constituted; but, if I thoroughly understand this Term miserable, it is a Word, that either has no Meaning, or signifies ​nothing but a Privation attended with Pain, and a suffering State of Body or Soul: now I would fain know what kind of Misery can be that of a free Being, whose Heart enjoys perfect Peace, and Body perfect Health? and which is aptest to become insupportable to those who enjoy it, a Civil or a Natural Life? In Civil Life we can scarcely meet a single Person who does not complain of his Existence; many even throw away as much of it as they can, and the united Force of Divine and Human Laws can hardly put bounds to this Disorder. Was ever any free Savage known to have been so much as tempted to complain of Life, and lay violent Hands on himself? Let us therefore judge with less Pride on which side real Misery is to be placed. Nothing, on the contrary, must have been so unhappy as savage Man, dazzled by flashes of Knowledge, racked by Passions, and reasoning on a State different from that in ​which he saw himself placed. It was in consequence of a very wise Providence, that the Faculties, which he potentially enjoyed, were not to develop themselves but in proportion as there offered Occasions to exercise them, lest they should be superfluous or troublesome to him when he did not want them, or tardy and useless when he did. He had in his Instinct alone every thing requisite to live in a State of Nature; in his cultivated Reason he has barely what is necessary to live in a State of Society.
It appears at first Sight that, as there was no kind of moral Relations between Men in this State, nor any known Duties, they could not be either good or bad, and had neither Vices nor Virtues, unless we take these Words in a Physical Sense, and call Vices, in the Individual, the Qualities which may prove detrimental to his own Preservation, and Virtues ​those which may contribute to it; in which case we should be obliged to consider him as most virtuous, who made least Resistance against the simple Impulses of Nature. But without deviating from the usual Meaning of these Terms, it is proper to suspend the Judgment we might form of such a Situation, and be upon our guard against Prejudice, till, the Balance in hand, we have examined whether there are more Virtues or Vices among civilized Men; or whether the Improvement of their Understanding is sufficient to compensate the Damage which they mutually do to each other, in proportion as they become better informed of the Services which they ought to do; or whether, upon the whole, they would not be much happier in a Condition, where they had nothing to fear or to hope from each other, than in that where they have submitted to an universal Subserviency, and have obliged themselves to depend for every thing ​upon the good will of those, who do not think themselves obliged to give any thing in return.
But above all things let us beware concluding with Hobbes, that Man, as having no Idea of Goodness, must be naturally bad; that he is vicious because he does not know what Virtue is; that he always refuses to do any Service to those of his own Species, because he believes that none is due to them; that, in virtue of that Right which he justly claims to every thing he wants, he foolishly looks upon himself as Proprietor of the whole Universe. Hobbes very plainly saw the Flaws in all the modern Definitions of Natural Right: but the Consequences, which he draws from his own Definition, show that it is, in the Sense he understands it, equally exceptionable. This Author, to argue from his own Principles, should say that the State of Nature, being that ​where the Care of our own Preservation interferes least with the Preservation of others, was of course the most favourable to Peace, and most suitable to Mankind; whereas he advances the very reverse in consequence of his having injudiciously admitted, as Objects of that Care which Savage Man should take of his Preservation, the Satisfaction of numberless Passions which are the work of Society, and have rendered Laws necessary. A bad Man, says he, is a robust Child. But this is not proving that Savage Man is a robust Child; and tho' we were to grant that he was, what could this Philosopher infer from such a Concession? That if this Man, when robust, depended on others as much as when feeble, there is no Excess that he would not be guilty of. He would make nothing of striking his Mother when she delayed ever so little to give him the Breast; he would claw, and bite, and strangle without remorse ​the first of his younger Brothers, that ever so accidentally jostled or otherwise disturbed him. But these are two contradictory Suppositions in the State of Nature, to be robust and dependent. Man is weak when dependent, and his own Master before he grows robust. Hobbes did not consider that the same Cause, which hinders Savages from making use of their Reason, as our Jurisconsults pretend, hinders them at the same time from making an ill use of their Faculties, as he himself pretends; so that we may say that Savages are not bad, precisely because they don't know what it is to be good; for it is neither the Development of the Understanding, nor the Curb of the Law, but the Calmness of their Passions and their Ignorance of Vice that hinders them from doing ill: tanto plus in illis proficit Vitiorum ignorantia, quam in his cognitio Virtutis. There is besides another Principle that has escaped Hobbes, and which, having been given ​to Man to moderate, on certain Occasions, the blind and impetuous Sallies of Self-love, or the Desire of Self-preservation previous to the Appearance of that Passion, (15) allays the Ardour, with which he naturally pursues his private Welfare, by an innate Abhorrence to see Beings suffer that resemble him. I shall not surely be contradicted, in granting to Man the only natural Virtue, which the most passionate Detractor of human Virtues could not deny him, I mean that of Pity, a Disposition suitable to Creatures weak as we are, and liable to so many Evils; a Virtue so much the more universal, and withal useful to Man, as it takes place in him of all manner of Reflection; and so natural, that the Beasts themselves sometimes give evident Signs of it. Not to speak of the Tenderness of Mothers for their Young; and of the Dangers they face to screen them from Danger; with what Reluctance are Horses known to ​trample upon living Bodies; one Animal never passes unmoved by the dead Carcass of another Animal of the same Species: there are even some who bestow a kind of Sepulture upon their dead Fellows; and the mournful Lowings of Cattle, on their entering the Slaughter House, publish the Impression made upon them by the horrible Spectacle they are there struck with. It is with Pleasure we see the Author of the Fable of the Bees, forced to acknowledge Man a compassionate and sensible Being; and lay aside, in the Example he offers to confirm it, his cold and subtile Stile, to place before us the pathetic Picture of a Man, who, with his Hands tied up, is obliged to behold a Beast of Prey tear a Child from the Arms of his Mother, and then with his Teeth grind the tender Limbs, and with his Claws rend the throbbing Entrails of the innocent Victim. What horrible Emotions must not such a ​Spectator experience at the sight of an Event which does not personally concern him? What anguish must he not suffer at his not being able to assist the fainting Mother or the expiring Infant?
Such is the pure Motion of Nature, anterior to all manner of Reflection; such is the Force of natural Pity, which the most dissolute Manners have as yet found it so difficult to extinguish, since we every Day see, in our theatrical Representations, those Men sympathize with the unfortunate and weep at their Sufferings, who, if in the Tyrant's Place, would aggravate the Torments of their Enemies. Mandeville was very sensible that Men, in spite of all their Morality, would never have been better than Monsters, if Nature had not given them Pity to assist Reason: but he did not perceive that from this Quality alone ​flow all the social Virtues, which he would dispute Mankind the Possession of. In fact, what is Generosity, what Clemency, what Humanity, but Pity applied to the Weak, to the Guilty, or to the Human Species in general? Even Benevolence and Friendship, if we judge right, will appear the Effects of a constant Pity, fixed upon a particular Object: for to wish that a Person may not suffer, what is it but to wish that he may be happy? Tho' it were true that Commiseration is no more than a Sentiment, which puts us in the place of him who suffers, a Sentiment obscure but active in the Savage, developed but dormant in civilized Man, how could this Notion affect the Truth of what I advance, but to make it more evident. In Fact, Commiseration must be so much the more energetic, the more intimately the Animal, that beholds any kind of Distress, identifies himself with ​the Animal that labours under it. Now it is evident that this Identification must have been infinitely more perfect in the State of Nature, than in the State of Reason. It is Reason that engenders Self-love, and Reflection that strengthens it; it is Reason that makes Man shrink into himself; it is Reason that makes him keep aloof from every thing that can trouble or afflict him: it is Philosophy that destroys his Connections with other Men; it is in consequence of her Dictates that he mutters to himself at the sight of another in Distress, You may perish for aught I care, nothing can hurt me. Nothing less than those Evils, which threaten the whole Species, can disturb the calm Sleep of the Philosopher, and force him from his Bed. One Man may with Impunity murder another under his Windows; he has nothing to do but clap his Hands to his Ears, argue a little with himself to hinder Nature, that startles ​within him, from identifying him with the unhappy Sufferer. Savage Man wants this admirable Talent; and for want of Wisdom and Reason, is always ready foolishly to obey the first Whispers of Humanity. In Riots and Street-Brawls the Populace flock together, the prudent Man sneaks off. They are the Dregs of the People, the poor Basket and Barrow-women, that part the Combatants, and hinder gentle Folks from cutting one another's Throats.
It is therefore certain that Pity is a natural Sentiment, which, by moderating in every Individual the Activity of Self-love, contributes to the mutual Preservation of the whole Species. It is this Pity which hurries us without Reflection to the Assistance of those we see in Distress; it is this Pity which, in a State of Nature, stands for Laws, for Manners, for Virtue, with this Advantage, that no one is ​tempted to disobey her sweet and gentle Voice: it is this Pity which will always hinder a robust Savage from plundering a feeble Child, or infirm old Man, of the Subsistence they have acquired with Pain and Difficulty, if he has but the least Prospect of providing for himself by any other Means: it is this Pity which, instead of that sublime Maxim of argumentative Justice, Do to others as you would have others do to you, inspires all Men with that other Maxim of natural Goodness a great deal less perfect, but perhaps more useful, Consult your own Happiness with as little Prejudice as you can to that of others. It is in a word, in this natural Sentiment, rather than in fine-spun Arguments, that we must look for the Cause of that Reluctance which every Man would experience to do Evil, even independently of the Maxims of Education. Tho' it may be the peculiar Happiness of Socrates and other Geniuses of his Stamp, ​to reason themselves into Virtue, the human Species would long ago have ceased to exist, had it depended entirely for its Preservation on the Reasonings of the Individuals that compose it.
With Passions so tame, and so salutary a curb, Men, rather wild than wicked, and more attentive to guard against Mischief than to do any to other Animals, were not exposed to any dangerous Dissensions: As they kept up no manner of Correspondence with each other, and were of course Strangers to Vanity, to Respect, to Esteem, to Contempt; As they had no Notion of what we call Meum and Tuum, nor any true Idea of Justice; As they considered any Violence they were liable to, as an Evil that could be easily repaired, and not as an Injury that deserved Punishment; And as they never so much as dreamed of Revenge, unless perhaps mechanically and unpremeditatedly, ​as a Dog who bites the Stone that has been thrown at him; their Disputes could seldom be attended with bloodshed, were they never occasioned by a more considerable Stake than that of Subsistence: but there is a more dangerous Subject of Contention, which I must not leave unnoticed.
Among the Passions which ruffle the Heart of Man, there is one of a hot and impetuous Nature, which renders the Sexes necessary to each other; a terrible Passion which despises all Dangers, bears down all Obstacles, and which in its Transports seems proper to destroy the human Species which it is destined to preserve. What must become of Men abandoned to this lawless and brutal Rage, without Modesty, without Shame, and every Day disputing the Objects of their Passion at the Expence of their Blood?
​We must in the first place allow that the more violent the Passions, the more necessary are Laws to restrain them: but besides that the Disorders and the Crimes, to which these Passions daily give rise among us, sufficiently prove the Insufficiency of Laws for that Purpose, we would do well to look back a little further and examine, if these Evils did not spring up with the Laws themselves; for at this Rate, tho' the Laws were capable of repressing these Evils, it is the least that might be expected from them, seeing it is no more than stopping the Progress of a Mischief which they themselves have produced.
Let us begin by distinguishing between what is moral and what is physical in the Passion called Love. The physical Part of it is that general Desire which prompts the Sexes to unite with each other; the moral Part is that which ​determines this Desire, and fixes it upon a particular Object to the Exclusion of all others, or at least gives it a greater Degree of Energy for this preferred Object. Now it is easy to perceive that the moral Part of Love is a factitious Sentiment, engendered by Society, and cried up by the Women with great Care and Address in order to establish their Empire, and secure Command to that Sex which ought to obey. This Sentiment, being founded on certain Notions of Beauty and Merit which a Savage is not capable of having, and upon Comparisons which he is not capable of making, can scarcely exist in him: for as his Mind was never in a Condition to form abstract Ideas of Regularity and Proportion, neither is his Heart susceptible of Sentiments of Admiration and Love, which, even without our perceiving it, are produced by our Application of these Ideas; he listens solely to ​the Dispositions implanted in him by Nature, and not to Taste which he never was in a Way of acquiring; and every Woman answers his Purpose.
Confined entirely to what is physical in Love, and happy enough not to know these Preferences which sharpen the Appetite for it, at the same Time that they increase the Difficulty of satisfying such Appetite, Men, in a State of Nature, must be subject to fewer and less violent Fits of that Passion, and of course there must be fewer and less violent Disputes among them in Consequence of it. The Imagination, which causes so many Ravages among us, never speaks to the Heart of Savages, who peaceably wait for the Impulses of Nature, yield to these Impulses without Choice and with more Pleasure than Fury; and whose Desires never outlive their Necessity for the thing desired.
​Nothing therefore can be more evident, than that it is Society alone, which has added even to Love itself as well as to all the other Passions, that impetuous Ardour, which so often renders it fatal to Mankind; and it is so much the more ridiculous to represent Savages constantly murdering each other to glut their Brutality, as this Opinion is diametrically opposite to Experience, and the Carribeans, the People in the World who have as yet deviated least from the State of Nature, are to all Intents and Purposes the most peaceable in their Amours, and the least subject to Jealousy, tho' they live in a burning Climate which seems always to add considerably to the Activity of these Passions.
As to the Inductions which may be drawn, in respect to several Species of Animals, from the Battles of the Males, who in all Seasons cover our Poultry ​Yards with Blood, and in Spring particularly cause our Forests to ring again with the Noise they make in disputing their Females, we must begin by excluding all those Species, where Nature has evidently established, in the relative Power of the Sexes, Relations different from those which exist among us: thus from the Battles of Cocks we can form no Induction that will affect the human Species. In the Species, where the Proportion is better observed, these Battles must be owing entirely to the fewness of the Females compared with the Males, or, which is all one, to the exclusive Intervals, during which the Females constantly refuse the Addresses of the Males; for if the Female admits the Male but two Months in the Year, it is all the same as if the Number of Females were five sixths less than what it is: now neither of these Cases is applicable to the human Species, where the Number of Females ​generally surpasses that of Males, and where it has never been observed that, even among Savages, the Females had, like those of other Animals, stated Times of Passion and Indifference. Besides, among several of these Animals the whole Species takes Fire all at once, and for some Days nothing is to be seen among them but Confusion, Tumult, Disorder and Bloodshed; a State unknown to the human Species where Love is never periodical. We cannot therefore conclude from the Battles of certain Animals for the Possession of their Females, that the same would be the Case of Man in a State of Nature; and tho' we might, as these Contests don't destroy the other Species, there is at least equal Room to think they would not be fatal to ours; nay it is very probable that they would cause fewer Ravages than they do in Society, especially in those Countries where, Morality being as yet held in some Esteem, the Jealousy of Lovers, and the ​Vengeance of Husbands every Day produce Duels, Murders, and even worse Crimes; where the Duty of an eternal Fidelity serves only to propagate Adultery; and the very Laws of Continence and Honour necessarily contribute to increase Dissoluteness, and multiply Abortions.
Let us conclude that savage Man, wandering about in the Forests, without Industry, without Speech, without any fixed Residence, an equal Stranger to War and every social Connection, without standing in any shape in need of his Fellows, as well as without any Desire of hurting them, and perhaps even without ever distinguishing them individually one from the other, subject to few Passions, and finding in himself all he wants, let us, I say, conclude that savage Man thus circumstanced had no Knowledge or Sentiment but such as are proper to that Condition, that he was alone sensible of his real ​Necessities, took notice of nothing but what it was his Interest to see, and that his Understanding made as little Progress as his Vanity. If he happened to make any Discovery, he could the less communicate it as he did not even know his Children. The Art perished with the Inventer; there was neither Education nor Improvement; Generations succeeded Generations to no Purpose; and as all constantly set out from the same Point, whole Centuries rolled on in the Rudeness and Barbarity of the first Age; the Species was grown old, while the Individual still remained in a State of Childhood.
If I have enlarged so much upon the Supposition of this primitive Condition, it is because I thought it my Duty, considering what ancient Errors and inveterate Prejudices I have to extirpate, to dig to the very Roots, and shew in a true ​picture of the State of Nature, how much even natural Inequality falls short in this State of that Reality and Influence which our Writers ascribe to it.
In Fact, we may easily perceive that among the Differences, which distinguish Men, several pass for natural, which are merely the Work of Habit and the different Kinds of Life adopted by Men living in a social Way. Thus a robust or delicate Constitution, and the Strength and Weakness which depend on it, are oftener produced by the hardy or effeminate Manner in which a Man has been brought up, than by the primitive Constitution of his Body. It is the same thus in Regard to the Forces of the Mind; and Education not only produces a Difference between those Minds which are cultivated and those which are not, but even increases that which is found among the first in proportion ​to their Culture; for let a Giant and a Dwarf set out in the same Path, the Giant at every Step will acquire a new Advantage over the Dwarf. Now, if we compare the prodigious Variety in the Education and Manner of living of the different Orders of Men in a civil State, with the Simplicity and Uniformity that prevails in the animal and savage Life, where all the Individuals make use of the same Aliments, live in the same Manner, and do exactly the same things, we shall easily conceive how much the Difference between Man and Man in the State of Nature must be less than in the State of Society, and how much every Inequality of Institution must increase the natural Inequalities of the Human Species.
But tho' Nature in the Distribution of her Gifts should really affect all the Preferences that are ascribed to her, what ​Advantage could the most favoured derive from her Partiality, to the Prejudice of others, in a State of things, which scarce admitted any kind of Relation between her Pupils? Of what Service can Beauty be, where there is no Love? What will Wit avail People who don't speak, or Craft those who have no Affairs to transact? Authors are constantly crying out, that the strongest would oppress the weakest; but let them explain what they mean by the Word Oppression. One Man will rule with Violence, another will groan under a constant Subjection to all his Caprices: this is indeed precisely what I observe among us, but I don't see how it can be said of savage Men, into whose Heads it would be a hard Matter to drive even the Meaning of the Words Domination and Servitude. One Man might indeed seize on the Fruits which another had gathered, on the Game which another had killed, ​on the Cavern which another had occupied for Shelter; but how is it possible he should ever exact Obedience from him, and what Chains of Dependence can there be among Men who possess nothing? If I am driven from one Tree, I have nothing to do but look out for another; if one Place is made uneasy to me, what can hinder me from taking up my Quarters elsewhere? But suppose I should meet a Man so much superior to me in Strength, and withal so wicked, so lazy and so barbarous as to oblige me to provide for his Subsistence while he remains idle; he must resolve not to take his Eyes from me a single Moment, to bind me fast before he can take the least Nap, lest I should kill him or give him the slip during his Sleep: that is to say, he must expose himself voluntarily to much greater Troubles than what he seeks to avoid, than any he gives me. And after all, let him abate ever so little of his Vigilance; let him at some sudden Noise ​but turn his Head another Way; I am already buried in the Forest, my Fetters are broke, and he never sees me again.
But without insisting any longer upon these Details, every one must see that, as the Bonds of Servitude are formed merely by the mutual Dependence of Men one upon another and the reciprocal Necessities which unite them, it is impossible for one Man to enslave another, without having first reduced him to a Condition in which he cannot live without the Enslaver's Assistance; a Condition which, as it does not exist in a State of Nature, must leave every Man his own Master, and render the Law of the strongest altogether vain and useless.
Having proved that the Inequality, which may subsist between Man and Man in a State of Nature, is almost imperceivable, and that it has very little ​Influence, I must now proceed to shew its Origin and trace its Progress, in the successive Developments of the human Mind. After having shewed, that Perfectibility, the social Virtues, and the other Faculties, which natural Man had received in Potentia, could never be developed of themselves, that for that Purpose there was a Necessity for the fortuitous Concurrence of several foreign Causes, which might never happen, and without which he must have eternally remained in his primitive Condition; I must proceed to consider and bring together the different Accidents which may have perfected the human Understanding by debasing the Species, render a Being wicked by rendering him sociable, and from so remote a Term bring Man at last and the World to the Point in which we now see them.
I must own that, as the Events I am about to describe might have happened ​many different Ways, my Choice of these I shall assign can be grounded on nothing but mere Conjecture; but besides these Conjectures becoming Reasons, when they are not only the most probable that can be drawn from the Nature of things, but the only Means we can have of discovering Truth, the Consequences I mean to deduce from mine will not be merely conjectural, since, on the Principles I have just established, it is impossible to form any other System, that would not supply me with the same Results, and from which I might not draw the same Conclusions.
This will authorize me to be the more concise in my Reflections on the Manner, in which the lapse of Time makes amends for the little Verisimilitude of Events; on the surprising Power of very trivial Causes, when they act without Intermission; on the Impossibility there is on ​the one hand of destroying certain Hypotheses, if on the other we cannot give them the Degree of Certainty which Facts must be allowed to possess; on its being the Business of History, when two Facts are proposed, as real, to be connected by a Chain of intermediate Facts which are either unknown or considered as such, to furnish such Facts as may actually connect them; and the Business of Philosophy, when History is silent, to point out similar Facts which may answer the same Purpose; in fine on the Privilege of Similitude, in regard to Events, to reduce Facts to a much smaller Number of different Classes than is generally imagined. It suffices me to offer these Objects to the Consideration of my Judges; it suffices me to have conducted my Enquiry in such a Manner as to save common Readers the Trouble of considering them.