OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Blake v. Doherty

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
18 U.S. 359
Blake v. Doherty
March 2d.
THIS cause was argued by Mr. Swann and Mr. Jones, for the plaintiffs in error, and by the Attorney-General and Mr. Kelly, for the defendants in error.
Mr. Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Blake v. City and County of San Francisco

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
113 U.S. 679
Blake v. City and County of San Francisco
Geo. W. Dyer, for appellant.
Wm. Craig, for appellees.
Woods, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Blake v. McClung

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Blake v. McClung."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Blake v. McClung (172 U.S. 239)
* Blake v. McClung (176 U.S. 59)
# Campbell v. United States (224 U.S. 99)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
224 U.S. 99
Campbell v. United States (224 U.S. 99)
Argued: March 6, 1912. --- Decided: March 18, 1912
Messrs. Aldis B. Browne, Gerald Hughes, Alexander Britton, Evans Browne, Clayton C. Dorsey, and Barnwell S. Stuart for plaintiffs in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 100-102 intentionally omitted]
Assistant Attorney General Denison for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 102-104 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Van Devanter delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Campbell v. United States (107 U.S. 407)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
107 U.S. 407
Campbell v. United States
Wm. M. Evarts, C. H. Southmayd, and Jos. H. Choate, for appellants.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for appellee.
MILLER, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Campbell v. United States (365 U.S. 85)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
365 U.S. 85
Campbell v. United States (365 U.S. 85)
Argued: Dec. 6, 1960. --- Decided: Jan 23, 1961
Messrs. Melvin S. Louison, Taunton, Mass., and Lawrence F. O'Donnell, Boston, Mass., for petitioners.
Mr. Roger G. Connor, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Campbell v. United States (266 U.S. 368)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
266 U.S. 368
Campbell v. United States (266 U.S. 368)
Argued: Oct. 15, 1924. --- Decided: Dec 8, 1924
Mr. John V. Campbell, of Cincinnati, Ohio, pro se.
The Attorney General and Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, of New York City, for the United States.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Campbell v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Campbell v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Campbell v. United States (107 U.S. 407)
* Campbell v. United States (224 U.S. 99)
* Campbell v. United States (266 U.S. 368)
* Campbell v. United States (365 U.S. 85)
* Campbell v. United States (373 U.S. 487)
# Bliss Company v. United States (253 U.S. 187)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
253 U.S. 187
Bliss Company v. United States (253 U.S. 187)
Argued: March 12 and 15, 1920. --- Decided: May 17, 1920
Mr. Arthur C. Fraser, of New York City, for appellant.
Messrs. Assistant Attorney General Davis and Daniel L. Morris, ofW ashington, D. C., for the United States.
Mr. Justice CLARKE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bliss Company v. United States (275 U.S. 509)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
275 U.S. 509
Bliss Company v. United States
Argued: Dec. 12, 1927. ---
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Blitz v. Brown

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
74 U.S. 693
Blitz v. Brown
IN this case-a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia-no authenticated transcript of the record had been filed. That which purported to be a transcript contained only a blank form of a certificate of authentication, without the seal of the court below or the signature of its clerk.
Two motions were now accordingly made; the first by Mr. Carlisle, for the defendant in error, to dismiss, the second by Mr. Bradley, in behalf of the plaintiff in error, for leave to withdraw the paper from the files, in order that the blank certificate might be duly signed and sealed, and that when thus perfected, the record might be returned and have its place on the docket, as if regularly filed, according to law and the practice of the court.
The CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bliss Company v. United States (275 U.S. 509)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
275 U.S. 509
Bliss Company v. United States
Argued: Dec. 12, 1927. ---
The judgment and order entered herein on November 29, 1927, is hereby revoked, and the following is now substituted in its stead:
This court is of opinion that the Secretary of the Navy had authority to make further contracts to pay the petitioner the increased cost resulting from the wage increases put into effect at the Secretary's instance, in the course of the petitioner's performance of the original contracts, and that the findings of the Court of Claims show that such further contracts were made and were based upon an adequate consideration, consisting of both advantage to the Government and detriment to the petitioner. The findings on other points are not such as to enable this court finally to dispose of the case. Accordingly the judgment of the Court of Claims is reversed and the cause is remanded to that court with directions (1) to make further findings (a) as to whether the instruments of release express the actual intention of the parties in respect of a settlement or release of the petitioner's claim for increased cost resulting from putting into effect the increased wages, or whether through mutual mistake, duress, or other sufficient ground for reformation the instruments of release were so drawn and signed that they failed to express the actual intention of the parties in that respect, and (b) as to what amount of increased cost to the petitioner resulted from the wage increases as respects work done under the original contracts after the wage increases took effect; (2) to make these findings from the evidence already taken and any additional evidence which the Court of Claims may deem it proper to receive; (3) to allow any amendments of the pleadings which may be needed to present the question whether the instruments of release should be reformed to express the actual intention of the parties in the particular herein named; and (4) to render such judgment in the cause as may be appropriate in view of the amended pleadings and the supplemented findings.
The mandate herein shall issue forthwith.
Messrs. William B. King, Bynum E. Hinton and George A. King, all of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Mr. William D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for the United States.

## Notes

* ↑ This order per curiam reversed judgment of the Court of Claims, and remanded the cause to that court for further findings.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Blitz v. Brown/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
74 U.S. 693
Blitz v. Brown
The filing of such a paper, as has been filed in this case, is not the filing of the transcript at the next term after the issuing of the writ of error, without which we can have no jurisdiction of the case. The motion to dismiss must be allowed.
So much of the motion made in behalf of the plaintiff in error as asks leave to withdraw the record is granted; but the residue of the motion must be denied. The case can be brought here only by a new writ of error.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bliss Company v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Bliss Company v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Bliss Company v. United States (248 U.S. 37)
* Bliss Company v. United States (253 U.S. 187)
* Bliss Company v. United States (275 U.S. 509)
# Bliss Company v. United States (248 U.S. 37)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
248 U.S. 37
Bliss Company v. United States
Argued: Nov. 20 and 21, 1918. --- Decided: Dec 9, 1918
Messrs. George W. Field and Arthur C. Fraser, both of New York City, for appellant.
Mr. G. Carroll Todd, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from page 38 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McKENNA delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Blessed be God

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Blessed be God."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Blessed be God", also called the "Divine Praises", an 18th-century Roman Catholic expiatory prayer
* Blessed be God, a prayer book by Charles Jerome Callan
# Bible (King James)/3 John
## Chapter 1

$^1$ The elder unto the wellbeloved Gaius, whom I love in the truth.
$^2$ Beloved, I wish above all things that thou mayest prosper and be in health, even as thy soul prospereth.
$^3$ For I rejoiced greatly, when the brethren came and testified of the truth that is in thee, even as thou walkest in the truth.
$^4$ I have no greater joy than to hear that my children walk in truth.
$^5$ Beloved, thou doest faithfully whatsoever thou doest to the brethren, and to strangers;
$^6$ Which have borne witness of thy charity before the church: whom if thou bring forward on their journey after a godly sort, thou shalt do well:
$^7$ Because that for his name's sake they went forth, taking nothing of the Gentiles.
$^8$ We therefore ought to receive such, that we might be fellowhelpers to the truth.
$^9$ I wrote unto the church: but Diotrephes, who loveth to have the preeminence among them, receiveth us not.
$^{10}$ Wherefore, if I come, I will remember his deeds which he doeth, prating against us with malicious words: and not content therewith, neither doth he himself receive the brethren, and forbiddeth them that would, and casteth them out of the church.
$^{11}$ Beloved, follow not that which is evil, but that which is good. He that doeth good is of God: but he that doeth evil hath not seen God.
$^{12}$ Demetrius hath good report of all men, and of the truth itself: yea, and we also bear record; and ye know that our record is true.
$^{13}$ I had many things to write, but I will not with ink and pen write unto thee:
$^{14}$ But I trust I shall shortly see thee, and we shall speak face to face. Peace be to thee. Our friends salute thee. Greet the friends by name.
Old Testament
* Genesis
* Exodus
* Leviticus
* Numbers
* Deuteronomy
* Joshua
* Judges
* Ruth
* 1 Samuel
* 2 Samuel
* 1 Kings
* 2 Kings
* 1 Chronicles
* 2 Chronicles
* Ezra
* Nehemiah
* Esther
* Job
* Psalms
* Proverbs
* Ecclesiastes
* Song of Solomon
* Isaiah
* Jeremiah
* Lamentations
* Ezekiel
* Daniel
* Hosea
* Joel
* Amos
* Obadiah
* Jonah
* Micah
* Nahum
* Habakkuk
* Zephaniah
* Haggai
* Zechariah
* Malachi
Deuterocanon/Apocrypha
* 1 Esdras
* 2 Esdras
* Tobit
* Judith
* Rest of Esther
* Wisdom of Solomon
* Ecclesiasticus
* Baruch
* Prayer of Azarias and Hymn of the Three Children
* Susanna
* Bel and the Dragon
* Prayer of Manasseh
* 1 Maccabees
* 2 Maccabees
New Testament
* Matthew
* Mark
* Luke
* John
* Acts
* Romans
* 1 Corinthians
* 2 Corinthians
* Galatians
* Ephesians
* Philippians
* Colossians
* 1 Thessalonians
* 2 Thessalonians
* 1 Timothy
* 2 Timothy
* Titus
* Philemon
* Hebrews
* James
* 1 Peter
* 2 Peter
* 1 John
* 2 John
* 3 John
* Jude
* Revelation
# Brain Sciences/Volume 7

* Issue 1 (January 2017)
* Issue 2 (February 2017)
* Issue 3 (March 2017)
* Issue 4 (April 2017)
* Issue 5 (May 2017)
* Issue 6 (June 2017)
* Issue 7 (July 2017)
* Issue 8 (August 2017)
* Issue 9 (September 2017)
* Issue 10 (October 2017)
* Issue 11 (November 2017)
* Issue 12 (December 2017)
# Brain Sciences/Volume 4

* Issue 1 (March 2014)
* Issue 2 (June 2014)
* Issue 3 (September 2014)
* Issue 4 (December 2014)
# Brain Sciences/Volume 5

* Issue 1 (March 2015)
* Issue 2 (June 2015)
* Issue 3 (September 2015)
* Issue 4 (December 2015)
# Brain Sciences/Volume 8

* Issue 1 (January 2018)
* Issue 2 (February 2018)
* Issue 3 (March 2018)
* Issue 4 (April 2018)
* Issue 5 (May 2018)
* Issue 6 (June 2018)
* Issue 7 (July 2018)
* Issue 8 (August 2018)
* Issue 9 (September 2018)
* Issue 10 (October 2018)
* Issue 11 (November 2018)
* Issue 12 (December 2018)
# Brain Sciences/Volume 6

* Issue 1 (March 2016)
* Issue 2 (June 2016)
* Issue 3 (September 2016)
* Issue 4 (December 2016)
# Brain Sciences/Volume 9

* Issue 1 (January 2019)
* Issue 2 (February 2019)
* Issue 3 (March 2019)
* Issue 4 (April 2019)
* Issue 5 (May 2019)
* Issue 6 (June 2019)
* Issue 7 (July 2019)
* Issue 8 (August 2019)
* Issue 9 (September 2019)
* Issue 10 (October 2019)
* Issue 11 (November 2019)
* Issue 12 (December 2019)
# Bridges v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Reed
United States Supreme Court
346 U.S. 209
Bridges v. United States
Argued: May 4, 1953. --- Decided: June 15, 1953
[Syllabus from pages 209-210 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Telford Taylor, Washington, D.C., for petitioners.
Mr. John F. Davis, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BURTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bridges v. Wixon

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Bridges v. Wixon."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Bridges v. Wixon (323 U.S. 708)
* Bridges v. Wixon (326 U.S. 135)
# Bridges v. Wixon (323 U.S. 708)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
323 U.S. 708
Bridges v. Wixon
Argued: January 1945 --- Decided: January 29, 1945
Messrs. Lee Pressman, Richard Gladstein, Henry Cohen, and Mrs. Carol King, for petitioner.
Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Messrs. Chester T. Lane, Robert S. Erdahl, and Leon Ulman, for respondent.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bridges v. Wixon (323 U.S. 708)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
323 U.S. 708
Bridges v. Wixon
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Granted.
The motion of the Communist Political Association for leave to intervene is denied.
Mr. Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bridges v. Wixon (326 U.S. 135)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
326 U.S. 135
Bridges v. Wixon
Argued: April 2, 3, 1945. --- Decided: June 18, 1945
Under statute providing for deportation of aliens who are members of or affiliated with any organization that believes in the overthrow by force of the government of the United States, 'affiliation' imports less than membership but more than sympathy, and a working alliance to bring to fruition the proscribed program of a proscribed organization, as distinguished from mere co-operation with a proscribed organization in lawful activities, is essential. Immigration Act of 1918, §§ 1-3, as amended, 8 U.S.C.A. § 137(c, e-g).
[Syllabus from pages 135-137 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Richard Gladstein, of San Francisco, Cal., and Lee Pressman, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Sol. Gen. Charles Fahy, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kunchigar

​Kunchigar.— The Kunchigars, Kunchitigas, or Kunchiliyans, are a class of cultivators in the Salem district, who speak Canarese, and have migrated southward to the Tamil country. Their tradition concerning their origin is that "a certain Nawāb, who lived north of the Tungabadra river, sent a peon (orderly) to search for ghī (clarified butter), twelve years old. In his travels south of the river, the peon met a lovely maid drawing water, who supplied his want. Struck by her beauty, he watched her bathing place, and stole one hair which fell from her head in bathing, which he took to the Nawāb. The latter conceived the idea of marrying the girl, and sent an embassy, which was so far successful that the girl and her family came to his residence, and erected a marriage pandal (booth). Subsequently they repented, and, thinking that the marriage would be a mésalliance (the Nawāb was probably a Muhammadan), fled in the night, leaving a dog in the pandal. In their flight they came to the Tungabadra, which was in full flood, and, ​eager to escape, they consented to marry the maiden to a Kurumban who ferried them across the river. The Kunchigars are the descendants of this girl and the Kurumban. When running away they, in their haste, forgot a little girl, and left her behind them. She was seized by the Nawāb, who thirsted for vengeance, and thrown into the air so as to fall on knives placed so as to transfix her. Some miracle interposed to save her, and the Arē Kunchigars of Mysore are her descendants."*
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kundatōn

​Kundatōn.— A name for chunam (lime) workers in Malabar.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kundanakkāran

​Kundanakkāran.——An occupational Tamil name for those who cut, enchase, and set precious stones.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kungiliyan

​Kungiliyan.— A title of some Kallans.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kunbi

​Kunbi.— Recorded, at times of Census, as a Bombay cultivating caste. (See Bombay Gazetteer, XVIII, Part I, 284.) It is also a sub-division of Marāthis, generally agriculturists, in the Sandūr State.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kuncheti

​Kunchēti. — A sub-division of Kāpu.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kunchu

​Kunchu (a tassel or bunch). — A sub-division of Okkiliyans, and of Koravas who make brushes used by weavers. Kuncham, meaning either a measure used in measuring grain or a tassel, occurs as an exogamous sept of Mādiga and Māla.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kunta

​Kunta. — A division of Kuravas of Travancore, who derive their name from their first ancestor having appeared from a sacrificial altar (hōmakunta).
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kunjamma

​Kunjamma. — A name for Elayad females.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kōkala

​Kōkala (woman's cloth).—An exogamous sept of Golla.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kīchagāra

​Kīchagāra.— A small class of Canarese basket-makers and beggars. The name is said to be derived from kichaku, meaning an imitative sound, in reference to the incessant noise which the Kīchagāras make when begging.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kōdla

​Kōdla.— Kodla (fowl) has been recorded as an exogamous sept of Tsākala, and Kōdla bochchu (fowl's feathers) as an exogamous sept of Kāpu.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kērē

​Kērē (tank). — A gōtra of Kurni.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kōdu

​Kōdu.——A form of Kondh. Also a sub-division of Konda Rāzu.