OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Electronics Technician/Volume 7/front matter

Sailor's Creed
"I am a United States Sailor.
I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America and I will obey the orders of those appointed over me.
I represent the fighting spirit of the
Navy and those who have gone before me to defend freedom and democracy around the world.
I proudly serve my country's Navy combat team with honor, courage
and commitment.
I am committed to excellence and the fair treatment of all."
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
# Electronics Technician/Volume 7/Preface

PREFACE
By enrolling in this self-study course, you have demonstrated a desire to improve yourself and the Navy. Remember, however, this self-study course is only one part of the total Navy training program. Practical experience, schools, selected reading, and your desire to succeed are also necessary to successfully round out a fully meaningful training program.
COURSE OVERVIEW: In completing this nonresident training course, you should be able to: discuss wave propagation in terms of the effects the earth's atmosphere has on it and the options available to receive optimum performance from equipment; identify communications and radar antennas using physical characteristics and installation location, radiation patterns, and power and frequency-handling capabilities. Be familiar with safety precautions for technicians working aloft; and discuss the different types of transmission lines in terms of physical structure, frequency limitations, electronic fields, and radiation losses.
THE COURSE: This self-study course is organized into subject matter areas, each containing learning objectives to help you determine what you should learn along with text and illustrations to help you understand the information. The subject matter reflects day-to-day requirements and experiences of personnel in the rating or skill area. It also reflects guidance provided by Enlisted Community Managers (ECMs) and other senior personnel, technical references, instructions, etc., and either the occupational or naval standards, which are listed in the Manual of Navy Enlisted Manpower Personnel Classifications and Occupational Standards, NAVPERS 18068.
THE QUESTIONS: The questions that appear in this course are designed to help you understand the material in the text.
VALUE: In completing this course, you will improve your military and professional knowledge. Importantly, it can also help you study for the Navy-wide advancement in rate examination. If you are studying and discover a reference in the text to another publication for further information, look it up.
1995 Edition Prepared by ETC Larry D. Simmons and ETC Floyd L. Ace III
Originally published in October 1995. Last reviewed for accuracy by ETC Craig Reidl in March 2003.
NAVSUP Logistics Tracking Number 0504-LP-026-7580
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Electronics Technician/Volume 7/Summary of the Electronics Technician Training Series

SUMMARY OF THE ELECTRONICS TECHNICIAN TRAINING SERIES
This series of training manuals was developed to replace the Electronics Technician 3 & 2 TRAMAN. The content is directed to personnel working toward advancement to Electronics Technician Second Class.
The nine volumes in the series are based on major topic areas with which the ET2 should be familiar. Volume 1, Safety, provides an introduction to general safety as it relates to the ET rating. It also provides both general and specific information on electronic tag-out procedures, man-aloft procedures, hazardous materials (i.e., solvents, batteries, and vacuum tubes), and radiation hazards. Volume 2, Administration, discusses COSAL updates, 3-M documentation, supply paperwork, and other associated administrative topics. Volume 3, Communication Systems, provides a basic introduction to shipboard and shore-based communication systems. Systems covered include man-pat radios (i.e., PRC-104, PSC-3) in the hf, vhf, uhf, SATCOM, and shf ranges. Also provided is an introduction to the Communications Link Interoperability System (CLIPS). Volume 4, Radar Systems, is a basic introduction to air search, surface search, ground controlled approach, and carrier controlled approach radar systems. Volume 5, Navigation Systems, is a basic introduction to navigation systems, such as OMEGA, SATNAV, TACAN, and man-pat systems. Volume 6, Digital Data Systems, is a basic introduction to digital data systems and includes discussions about SNAP II, laptop computers, and desktop computers. Volume 7, Antennas and Wave Propagation, is an introduction to wave propagation, as it pertains to Electronics Technicians, and shipboard and shore-based antennas. Volume 8, Support Systems, discusses system interlaces, troubleshooting, sub-systems, dry air, cooling, and power systems. Volume 9, Electro-Optics, is an introduction to night vision equipment, lasers, thermal imaging, and fiber optics.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Electronics Technician/Volume 7/Appendix II

APPENDIX II
REFERENCES USED TO DEVELOP THIS TRAMAN
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Sturgess

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
59 U.S. 40
Ex parte Sturgess
Mr. Lawrence, of counsel for the plaintiffs in error in these cases, filed certificates of the clerk of the circuit court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana, stating that judgments were entered against the plaintiffs in error in that court, on the 16th day of November, 1855, and that writs of error were duly applied for, and allowed on the 21st of November, 1855, returnable to the December term, 1855, of the supreme court of the United States. The certificates further stated that the clerk could not, consistently with the other duties of his office, make out and have ready the transcripts of the records and proceedings at the opening of the term of the supreme court, nor within less than ninety days thereafter.
Whereupon, Mr. Lawrence applied for an extension of time under the 63d rule of this court.
Mr. Justice McLEAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Texas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
315 U.S. 8
Ex parte Texas
Argued: Dec. 8, 9, 1941. --- Decided: Jan 12, 1942
Mr. James P. Hart, of Austin, Tex., for petitioners.
Mr. Charles L. Black, of Austin, Tex., for intervener, Lone Star Gas Co., by special leave of court.
Messrs. James P. Alexander, John H. Sharp, and Richard Critz, Justices of the Supreme Court of Texas, all of Austin, Tex., pro se.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Tom Tong

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
108 U.S. 556
Ex parte Tom Tong
[Syllabus from page 556 intentionally omitted]
[Statement of Case from pages 556-557 intentionally omitted]
S. F. Phillips, Thos. Simons, andHall McAllister, for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from page 557 intentionally omitted]
L. D. Latimer, in opposition.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte State Insurance Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
85 U.S. 417
Ex parte State Insurance Company
Much argument is addressed to us on the construction of the act of March 3d, 1873, concerning the District and Circuit Courts of Alabama, especially whether by that act the Circuit Court sitting at Mobile has circuit court jurisdiction over the whole State or not. In the view we take of the present case it is not necessary for us to decide that question.
Prior to that time the District Court of the United States for the Middle District of Alabama was a court invested with circuit court powers: Among those powers, in our opinion, was that of receiving and exercising jurisdiction over cases removed from the State courts within its territorial limits. The case before us was of that class. No question is raised that the requirements of the law for the removal were complied with. The order for the removal was made on the 11th day of January, 1873, and the papers filed in the office of the clerk of the Circuit Court for the Southern District on the 18th day of the same month.
The order of the State court was that 'this cause be removed out of this court into the Circuit Court of the United States at Mobile, Alabama, that being the Circuit Court of the United States for this district.' The county of Barbour, in which the State court sat and made this order, was in the Middle District of Alabama, and as, in our judgment, the case, if to be removed at all, should have been removed to the District Court for that district, to be disposed of in the exercise of its circuit court powers, we think the order of the State court was void. That it conferred no jurisdiction of the case on the Circuit Court for the Southern District of Alabama, because it could take none as the law then stood. Whatever may by the effect of the subsequent act of March 3d, 1873, on the jurisdiction of all these courts, there is nothing in it which removes the difficulty in the present case.
The Circuit Court at Mobile was, therefore, right in refusing to hear the case, and ordering it to be stricken from the docket, and the mandamus now asked for is
DENIED.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Tracy

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
249 U.S. 551
Ex parte Tracy
Argued: April 14, 1919. When leave to file the petition for habeas corpus was previously denied (249 U.S. 588, 39 Sup. Ct. 385, 63 L. Ed. --), without a suggestion as to the existence of any exceptional condition which would have justified a contrary view, such refusal presumably was based on the existence of the right to seek, if desired, other and appropriate sources of relief. From this it follows that although we pass the application of the doctrine that the refusal of habeas corpus is not the thing adjudged precluding a subsequent granting of such writ ---

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Tracy/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
249 U.S. 551
Ex parte Tracy
Argued: April 14, 1919. When leave to file the petition for habeas corpus was previously denied (249 U.S. 588, 39 Sup. Ct. 385, 63 L. Ed. --), without a suggestion as to the existence of any exceptional condition which would have justified a contrary view, such refusal presumably was based on the existence of the right to seek, if desired, other and appropriate sources of relief. From this it follows that although we pass the application of the doctrine that the refusal of habeas corpus is not the thing adjudged precluding a subsequent granting of such writ ---
[552]
upon the same facts, nevertheless there is here no reason to grant the order prayed, since the previous order rested upon the right and duty to petition for relief, if habeas corpus was desired, to other and appropriate sources of judicial power.
No reason, therefore, exists for granting the motion, and to
avoid any implication of a necessity which does not obtain, the motion is denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Sturgess/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
59 U.S. 40
Ex parte Sturgess
In the above cases writs of error were allowed on the 21st day of November last, the judgments having been entered on the 16th of that month. The clerk of the circuit court certifies that he cannot, consistently with the other duties of his office, make out and have ready the transcript of the record and proceedings in the said causes, in time for the same to reach Washington City at the opening of the term of the supreme court, nor within less than ninety days thereafter.
On this statement of the clerk, a motion is made for longer time to certify the record.
At the December term, 1853, this court adopted a rule requiring, where a judgment or decree was entered thirty days before the succeeding term of this court, that the writ of error or appeal should be entered on the record of this court, and the record filed within the first six days of the term. But if less than thirty days intervene, between the entry of the judgment or decree, and the sitting of this court, the case should be entered on the docket of this court, and the record filed, within thirty days from the commencement of the term.
The above rule was adopted to prevent unnecessary and improper delays, in prosecuting writs of error or appeals in this court from the inferior courts. Thirty days from the commencement of this term affords ample time to the clerk, to make out and forward the records in the above cases. The rules of this court can, in no respect, depend upon the convenience of the clerks of the inferior courts.
Extension denied, and motion overruled.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Honorius IV.

See also Pope Honorius IV on Wikipedia; Pope Honorius IV on Wikipedia; Honorius in the 11th Edition; and the disclaimer.
HONORIUS IV. succeeded Martin IV., and was pope for two years (1285–1287). After an uneventful pontificate he was succeeded by Nicholas IV.
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Honorius III.

See also Pope Honorius III on Wikipedia; Pope Honorius III on Wikipedia; Honorius in the 11th Edition; and the disclaimer.
HONORIUS III., pope from 1216 to 1227, was the successor of Innocent III., whose uncompromising policy in the struggle between the papacy and the empire he had not firmness and vigour to continue. He consented to crown Frederick II. as Holy Roman emperor in 1220, although the engagements made with his predecessor had not been fulfilled; the promises which he himself had exacted he was somewhat slow to urge, and it was left to his successor Gregory IX. to insist upon their accomplishment. He gave papal sanction to the Dominican order in 1216, and to the Franciscan in 1223; and during his pontificate also many of the tertiary orders first came into existence.
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Houston

See also Houston on Wikipedia; Houston on Wikipedia; Houston in the 11th Edition; and the disclaimer.
HOUSTON, a city of the United States, capital of Harris county, Texas, and the next city in the State to Galveston as regards both population and commercial enterprise, is situated on the left bank of Buffalo bayou at the head of navigation, and at the junction of several railways, 50 miles north-west of Galveston. The bayou is crossed at Houston by several bridges. Most of the streets are shaded by fine avenues of trees, and the principal of them are traversed by tramway cars. The chief buildings are the city-hall and market-house, completed in 1874, at a cost of 400,000 dollars, the masonic temple of the grand lodge of Texas, and the hotels, the largest of which is the finest in the State. The city is well supplied with schools and churches, and has two large public libraries. It is the principal railway centre of the State, and the depôt of an extensive and rich agricultural region, besides being the seat of important and varied manufactures. The recent deepening of the bayou so as to make it navigable for vessels drawing 9 feet of water has considerably increased the shipping trade, which is chiefly in lumber. The town possesses iron and brass founderies, railway machine shops, planing-mills, factories for cars, waggons, and agricultural implements, sheet-iron and tin works, a large flour-mill, beef-packing establishments, and manufactures of cotton, soap, Portland cement, and bone dust. In the neighbourhood there are extensive nurseries. The annual fair of the State of Texas is held at Houston. The city, which was named after Samuel Houston, noticed below, was settled in 1836, and in 1837 it was for a short time the capital of the State. In 1870 the population was 9382, and in 1880 it had increased to 17,000.
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Honorius I.

See also Pope Honorius I on Wikipedia; Pope Honorius I on Wikipedia; Honorius in the 11th Edition; and the disclaimer.
HONORIUS I., pope from 625 to 638, succeeded Boniface V. The festival of the Elevation of the Cross is said to have been instituted during his pontificate, which was marked also by considerable missionary enterprise. Honorius in his lifetime had favoured the formula proposed by the emperor Heraclius with the design of bringing about a reconciliation between the Monophysites and the Catholics, which bore that Christ had accomplished His work of redemption by one manifestation of His will as the God-man. For this he was, more than forty years after his death, anathematized by name along with the other Monothelite heretics by the council of Constantinople (First Trullan) in 680; and this condemnation was subsequently confirmed by more than one pope, particularly by Leo II., as has been abundantly proved by unimpeachable evidence against the contentions of Baronius and Bellarmine (see Hefele, Die Irrlehre des Honorius u. das vaticanische Lehre der Unfehlbarkeit, 1871, who, however, has modified his view in Conciliengeschichte, 1877). Honorius I. was succeeded by Severinus.
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Honorius

See also Honorius (disambiguation) on Wikipedia; and the disclaimer.
In the 9th edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica, Honorius may refer to:
* Flavius Augustus Honorius, emperor of the West;
* Pope Honorius I.;
* Pope Honorius II.;
* Pope Honorius III.;
* Pope Honorius IV.; or
* the antipope Peter Cadalus, styled Honorius II.
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Honorius II.

See also Pope Honorius II on Wikipedia; Pope and Antipope Honorius II on Wikipedia; Honorius in the 11th Edition; and the disclaimer.
HONORIUS II. (Lambert of Ostia), pope from 1124 to 1130, succeeded Calixtus II. As papal legate he had been one of the framers of the concordat of Worms (1122). During his pontificate the Præmonstratensian order, and also that of the Knights Templars, received papal sanction. His successor was Innocent II.
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Hoo-Chow-Foo

See also Huzhou on Wikipedia; Huzhou on Wikipedia; Hu-chow-fu in the 11th Edition; and the disclaimer.
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Horatio Greenough

See also Horatio Greenough on Wikipedia; Horatio Greenough on Wikipedia, Greenough in the 11th edition; and the disclaimer.
​GREENOUGH, Horatio (1805-1852), an American sculptor, son of a Boston merchant, was born at Boston, September 6, 1805. At the age of sixteen he entered Harvard College ; but while there he devoted his principal attention to art, and in the autumn of 1825 he went to Rome, where he enjoyed the advantage of instruction from Thorwaldsen. After a short visit in 1826 to Boston, where he executed busts of John Quincy Adams and other persons of distinction, he returned to Italy and took up his residence at Florence. Here one of his first commissions was from James Fenimore Cooper for a group of Chanting Cherubs; and the success of this work, joined to the strong recom mendation of Cooper, Dana, Everett, and others, led to his being chosen by the Government to execute the colossal statue of Washington for the national capital. It was unveiled in 1843 ; and as an accurate likeness, conceived in a lofty and truly poetical spirit, it is entitled to high rank among modern works of a similar kind. Shortly afterwards he received a second commission from Government for a colossal group, the " Rescue," intended to represent the conflict between the Anglo-Saxon and Indian races. In 1851 he returned to Washington to superintend its erection, and in the autumn of 1852 he was attacked by brain fever, of which he died, 18th December. Among other works of Greenough may be mentioned a bust of Lafayette, the Medora, and the Venus Victrix in the gallery of the Boston Athenaeum. Grsenoughwas a man of wide culture, and his occasional productions in prose and verse gave evidence of a capacity to attain the same eminence in literature as in art. See Memoir of Horatio Greenovgh, by H. T. Tuckermnnn, 1853.
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/House of Tudor

See also House of Tudor on Wikipedia; House of Tudor in the 11th Edition; and the disclaimer.
TUDOR, House of. See Henry VII. and Lancaster, House of, vol. xiv. p. 257.