OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# One Common Trench or Two Opposite Sides?

Translation of the pre-2003 Government of Iraq
The Arab Socialist Baath Party regards all Arabs as being part of one nation both in the cultural and spiritual sense. The different countries, in which they live, make up a politically and economically united fatherland. In the Party's documents, 'the Arab fatherland' means all the Arab countries. Each of these is a ‘qotr’, which, literally translated, means country; in the Baath context, it should be read as province or region. The adjective 'Qotri' (provincial, regional) is used when referring to an individual country. The adjective 'qawmi' (national), on the other hand, is used when referring to all the countries, which together make up the one fatherland. Thus, the National Leadership deals only with matters concerning the whole fatherland. Each Regional Leadership deals with matters within its own country.
As for example, the Lebanese or Jordanian Regional Leadership etc.
The word Baath can be translated as meaning revival, resurgence or renewal. Hitherto, resurgence seems to be the meaning, which is preferred by Arab intellectuals and foreign Arab experts.
This work is presumed to be in the public domain in the United States because it was first published in Iraq before Iraq signed a copyright treaty with the United States.
This work may still be copyrighted in other countries and areas.
Note: the inclusion of such works in Wikisource is currently under discussion.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# One Big Union of All the Workers, the Greatest Thing on Earth/IWW preamble

THE I. W. W. PREAMBLE.
The working class and the employing class have nothing in common. There can be no peace so long as hunger and want are found among millions of working people, and the few who make up the employing class have all the good things of life.
Between these two classes a struggle must go on until the workers of the world organize as a class, take possession of the earth and the machinery of production, and abolish the wage system.
We find that the centering of the management of industries into fewer and fewer hands makes the trade unions unable to cope with the ever-growing power of the employing class. The trade unions foster a state of affairs which allows one set of workers to be pitted against another set of workers in the same industry, thereby helping to defeat one another in wage wars. Moreover, the trade unions aid the employing class to mislead the workers into the belief that the working class have interests in common with their employers.
These conditions can be changed and the interests of the working class upheld only by an organization formed in such a way that all its members in any one industry, or in all industries if necessary, cease work whenever a strike or lockout is on in any department thereof, thus making an injury to one an injury to all.
Instead of the conservative motto: "A fair day's wages for a fair day's work," we must inscribe on our banner the revolutionary watchword: "Abolition of the wage system."
It is the historic mission of the working class to do away with Capitalism. The army of production must be organized, not only for the every-day struggle with capitalism, but also to carry on production when capitalism shall have been overthrown. By organizing industrially we are forming the structure of the new society within the shell of the old.
# Periplus

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Periplus."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Periplus of the Erythraean Sea, an anonymous 1st-century Greek account of international trade in the Indian Ocean
* Periplus of the Euxine Sea, by Arrian
* Periplus of his travels, by Hanno the Navigator
* Periplus of the Mediterranean, by Pseudo-Scylax
* Periplus of the Inner Sea (i.e., Mediterranean), by Marcian of Heraclea
* Periplus of the Outer Sea (i.e., the Ocean), by Marcian of Heraclea
# Periplus of the Erythraean Sea/Date

​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/300 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/301 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/302 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/303
# Periplus of the Erythraean Sea/Duty at Alexandria

​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/299
# Periplus of the Erythraean Sea/Index

​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/305 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/306 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/307 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/308 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/309 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/310 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/311 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/312 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/313 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/314 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/315 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/316 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/317 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/318 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/319 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/320 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/321 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/322 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/323 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/324 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/325 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/326 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/327 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/328 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/329 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/330 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/331 ​Page:The Periplus of the Erythræan Sea.djvu/332 ​}. 5 . f 77 ' -- , ItomMcut, 77 191 T7 tun mfcl*. 77
I, 71, 72, 7( the it* com . 61 I Vult, Cat. Mrtvy. 64, 7f, M. M. - 2U A 9.67 .K 47 9. lu, 44. 91. 91 . 42 i ltai 10 v HnMf.ll.> I, 263, Y 1S4 16S, 166, 167, IIS, 116. 117. /-I V ' .-*. 1$9 xsmi.:' rr . Zeus 112 ,hw, 97 69 9, 10. . -. 66 /:., j A.SU! i . Xul Kamam. 101 S, 119, 14J,
# Pirie v. Tvedt

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
115 U.S. 41
Pirie v. Tvedt
G. E. Cole, for plaintiffs in error.
No appearance for defendant in error.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pitcock v. State/Concurrence Hart

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Hart
* Wood
* Dissenting Opinion Battle
​HART, J., (concurring.) A majority of the judges think that the allegations of the complaint which was the basis of the injunction, for a disobedience of which Pitcock was fined, bring this case squarely within the principles of McConnell v. Arkansas Brick & Manufacturing Company, 70 Ark. 568; and that the ​decision here, if that case is to stand, must be an affirmance. I do not think so. In the McConnell case there was a valid contract, made pursuant to our statutes regulating the hiring out of convicts, between the Board of Penitentiary Commissioners, as the agents and representatives of the State, and the Arkansas Brick and Manufacturing Company. The effect of the holding in the McConnell case was that the board could not abrogate that contract, such power being vested alone in the Legislature, and they were enjoined from so doing. The instant case to my mind is plainly distinguishable. The contract shows by its terms that it has expired. The allegations of the complaint amount to no more than an attempt by judicial construction to extend the terms of the contract exhibited with it. In short, the thing, asked to be done and performed by the Penitentiary Board are the very things which, when done and performed, would constitute a performance of the contract as its terms are construed by the successors to the Arkansas Brick & Manufacturing Company. In other words, the case resolves itself into a suit for a specific performance against the State. My attention has been called to no case, and I have been unable to find any, which gives the courts jurisdiction to entertain such a suit. Such a view is contrary to the principles of State sovereignty upon which our government is founded, and which must endure as long as the State itself. Because the expression of a majority of the judges as above indicated as to the effect of the McConnell case is in my judgment an unwarranted extension of the principles at issue in that case, and because I believe the McConnell case to be wrong in principle, I have voted to overrule it.
# Pitcock v. State/Dissent Battle

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Hart
* Wood
* Dissenting Opinion Battle
​BATTLE, J., (dissenting.) The contract involved in this case is the same as that held to be valid in McConnell v. Arkansas Brick & Manufacturing Company, 70 Ark. 568. But this is denied by saying that the contract adjudged to be valid in the McConnell case has expired. I do not think so. The Board of Commissioners of Arkansas State Penitentiary failed often to comply with that contract by furnishing the Arkansas Brick & Manufacturing Company with the labor of convicts as it had agreed to do, and upon each of such failures and during the life of the contract promised to furnish the company with such labor until it had furnished all it had contracted to do, and adopted resolutions to that effect, and caused them to be spread at length ​upon its minutes. These promises were based upon valuable considerations, and did not constitute new contracts but a continuation of the old by an extension of the time of its performance. The labor to be furnished under the promises was to be in performance of the original contract, which could not expire until it was performed in the manner promised. If I am correct in this conclusion, the board is enjoined and restrained by the decree in the McConnell case from in any manner cancelling or annulling the contract as thus extended and "from refusing and failing to execute and carry out" its terms. The board in this case is the same as in that, the membership being different.
I dissented in the McConnell case on the ground that that suit was in effect, a suit against the State, which could not be sued. But the court held differently, and its judgment in that case has passed beyond its control, and become final, and I think should be enforced in this case. The parties have rightly acted upon the faith of it, and should not suffer on account of confidence in the judgment of the court.
# Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining Milling Company v. Pennsylvania

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
125 U.S. 181
Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining Milling Company v. Pennsylvania
[Statement of Case from pages 182-183 intentionally omitted]
W. M. Newlin, for plaintiff in error.
W. S. Kirkpatrick, Atty. Gen., and John F. Sanderson, Deputy Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice FIELD, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Penal Code (Amendment) Act 2022

Layout 2
REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE
GOVERNMENT GAZETTE
ACTS SUPPLEMENT
Published by Authority
First published in the Government Gazette, Electronic Edition, on 3 January 2023 at 5 pm.
The following Act was passed by Parliament on 29 November 2022 and assented to by the President on 27 December 2022:—
REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE
No. 39 of 2022.
I assent.
HALIMAH YACOB, President. 27 December 2022.
An Act to repeal section 377A of the Penal Code 1871 and to make consequential amendments to that Code and certain other Acts.
Be it enacted by the President with the advice and consent of the Parliament of Singapore, as follows:
​Short title
1. This Act is the Penal Code (Amendment) Act 2022.
Repeal of section 377A
2. Section 377A of the Penal Code 1871 is repealed.
Consequential amendments
3. The provisions of the Acts specified in the first column of the Schedule are amended in the manner set out in the second column of the Schedule.
Saving provision
4. Despite the provisions of this Act, section 425A of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010 continues to apply in relation to an offence under section 377A of the Penal Code 1871 committed before the date of commencement of this Act.
THE SCHEDULE
Section 3
CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS
| | First column | Second column |
| 1. | Criminal Procedure Code 2010 | |
| | (a) Section 2(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of “sexual offence”) | Delete “377A,”. |
| | (b) First Schedule | Delete the item relating to section 377A of the Penal Code 1871. |
| 2. | Evidence Act 1893 | |
| | First Schedule, Part 2, item 1 | Delete “377A,”. ​ |
| 3. | Penal Code 1871 | |
| | (a) Section 376E(2)(a) | Delete “377A,”. |
| | (b) Section 376EA(2)(a) | Delete “377A,”. |
This work is Singaporean legislation (Act of Parliament or subsidiary legislation), which is copyrighted in Singapore for 70 years after publication pursuant to
* sections 114(1) and 136(1)(b) of the Copyright Act 2021, or
* section 197(3)(b) of the repealed Copyright Act (Cap. 63, 2006 Rev. Ed.) for legislation published before 21 November 2021.
However, as an edict of a government, it is in the public domain in the U.S.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Piccirillo v. New York/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Douglas Brennan
United States Supreme Court
400 U.S. 548
Piccirillo v. New York
Argued: Nov. 9, 1970. --- Decided: Jan 25, 1971
The occasion for granting the writ in this case was to resolve the important question whether it is necessary to accord 'transactional' immunity, see Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547, 12 S.Ct. 195, 35 L.Ed. 1110 (1892), to compel a witness to give testimony before a state grand jury over his claim of the privilege against self-incrimination, or whether mere 'use' immunity suffices to that end, see, e.g., Murphy v. Waterfront Comm'n, 378 U.S. 52, 84 S.Ct. 1594, 12 L.Ed.2d 678 (1964); Uniformed Sanitation Men Assn., Inc. v. Commissioner of Sanitation of City of New York, 426 F.2d 619 (CA2 1970).
After considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties on this writ, we have reached the conclusion that the decision of the New York Court of Appeals in Gold v. Menna, 25 N.Y.2d 475, 307 N.Y.S.2d 33, 225 N.E.2d 235 (1969), which makes clear that transactional immunity is required in New York and also indicates that such court's earlier decision in the case before us, People v. La Bello, 24 N.Y.2d 598, 301 N.Y.S.2d 544, 249 N.E.2d 412 (1969), may have rested on that premise, makes this case an inappropriate vehicle for deciding a question of such far-reaching importance.
With the intervening decision in Gold, no controversy any longer exists between the parties as to the question which impelled us to grant the writ: whether, in the circumstances involved in this case, Piccirillo was entitled to 'use' or 'transactional' immunity. While it is true that, technically speaking, issues remain in the case concerning the kind of immunity required by federal law and, if it be 'transactional' rather than 'use' immunity in such a case as this, the proper scope of such immunity, both issues arise only against the sterile background of agreement between the parties that Piccirillo is entitled to 'transactional' immunity under state law. Thus, our determination upon the fundamental constitutional question underlying this case would be in no sense necessary to its resolution in this instance.
In this posture of affairs, we conclude that the writ of certiorari should be dismissed as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.
Writ of certiorari dismissed.
Mr. Justice BLACK dissents from the dismissal of this writ as improvidently granted. He would vacate the judgment below and remand the case to the New York Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of its later opinion in Gold v. Menna, 25 N.Y.2d 475, 307 N.Y.S.2d 33, 255 N.E.2d 235.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, with whom Mr. Justice MARSHALL concurs, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pick Manufacturing Company v. General Motors Corporation

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
299 U.S. 3
Pick Manufacturing Company v. General Motors Corporation
Argued: Oct. 13, 14, 1936. --- Decided: Oct 26, 1936
Mr. Carl B. Rix, of Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioner.
Messrs. John M. Zane, Thomas Francis Howe, and Henry S. Rademacher, all of Chicago, Ill., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pickelsimer v. Wainwright

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
375 U.S. 2
Pickelsimer v. Wainwright
Petitioners pro se.
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen. of Fla., and A. G. Spicola, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents Pickelsimer, Sharp and Heard.
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen. of Fla., and George R. Georgieff, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents Mihelcich, Cowan and Kitchens.
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen. of Fla., and James G. Mahorner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents Dumond, Baker, Campbell and Mitchell.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pick Manufacturing Company v. General Motors Corporation/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
299 U.S. 3
Pick Manufacturing Company v. General Motors Corporation
Argued: Oct. 13, 14, 1936. --- Decided: Oct 26, 1936
By this suit petitioner challenged the validity under section 3 of the Clayton Act (38 Stat. 730, 731, 15 U.S.C. § 14 (15 U.S.C.A. § 14)) of a provision of the contracts made with dealers by selling organizations of the General Motors Corporation. The provision in the contract between the Chevrolet Motor Company and dealers is as follows: 'Dealer agrees that he will not sell, offer for sale, or use in the repair of Chevrolet motor vehicles and chassis second-hand or used parts or any part or parts not manufactured by or authorized by the Chevrolet Motor Company. It is agreed that Dealer is not granted any exclusive selling rights in genuine new Chevrolet parts or accessories.'
There is a similar provision in contracts made by the Buick Company.
The District Court dismissed the bill of complaint for want of equity, and its decree was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 80 F.(2d) 641. Upon the evidence adduced at the trial, the District Court found that the effect of the clause had not been in any way substantially to lessen competition or to create a monopoly in any line of commerce. This finding was sustained by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 80 F.(2d) 641, at page 644.
Under the established rule, this Court accepts the findings in which two courts concur unless clear error is shown. Stuart v. Hayden, 169 U.S. 1, 14, 18 S.Ct. 274, 42 L.Ed. 639; Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. Railroad Commission, 232 U.S. 338, 34 S.Ct. 438, 58 L.Ed. 630; Texas & N.O.R. Co. v. Brotherhood of Railway & S. S.C.lerks, 281 U.S. 548, 558, 50 S.Ct. 427, 429, 74 L.Ed. 1034; United States v. Commercial Credit Co., 286 U.S. 63, 67, 52 S.Ct. 467, 468, 76 L.Ed. 978; Continental Illinois Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R. Co., 294 U.S. 648, 678, 55 S.Ct. 595, 607, 79 L.Ed. 1110. Applying this rule, the decree is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER, Mr. Justice STONE, and Mr. Justice ROBERTS took no part in the consideration and decision of this cause.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pickard v. East Tennessee, V. & G. Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
130 U.S. 637
Pickard v. East Tennessee, V. & G. Railroad Company
G. W. Pickle, Atty. Gen. of Tennessee, for appellant.
Wm. M. Baxter, for appellee.
FIELD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# One of Ours

* related portals: Pulitzers.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Winner of the 1923 Pulitzer Prize for the Novel. It tells the story of the life of Claude Wheeler, a Nebraska native around the turn of the 20th century.
WILLA CATHER
ONE OF OURS
ONE OF OURS
BOOKS BY
WILLA CATHER
ALEXANDER’S BRIDGE
O PIONEERS
THE SONG OF THE LARK
MY ANTONIA
YOUTH AND THE BRIGHT MEDUSA
ONE OF OURS
ONE OF OURS
WILLA CATHER
“Bidding the eagles of the West fly on . . . ”
Vachel Lindsay
NEW YORK ALFRED · A · KNOPF MCMXXII
COPYRIGHT, 1922, BY
ALFRED A. KNOPF, INC.
First printing, September, 1922, consisted of thirty-five copies on Imperial Japan Vellum and three hundred and ten copies on Perusia handmade Italian paper, numbered and signed by the author.
Second Printing, September, 1922 Third Printing, September, 1922 Fourth Printing, September, 1922
Set up and electrotyped by the Vail-Ballou Co., Binghamton, N. Y.
Paper furnished by W. F. Etherington & Co., New York, N. Y. Printed and bound by the Plimpton Press, Norwood, Mass.
MANUFACTURED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
For my mother VIRGINIA CATHER
CONTENTS :
| Book | I | On Lovely Creek | 1 |
| Book | II | Enid | 117 |
| Book | III | Sunrise on the Prairie | 201 |
| Book | IV | The Voyage of the Anchises | 267 |
| Book | V | “Bidding the Eagles of the West Fly On” | 323 |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1947, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 76 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# One need not be a Chamber—to be Haunted—

* "Ghosts" in Poems: Second Series (1891)
* "One need not be a chamber to be haunted" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# One of Cleopatra's Nights, and Other Fantastic Romances

Translated by Lafcadio Hearn
ONE OF
CLEOPATRA'S NIGHTS
AND
OTHER FANTASTIC ROMANCES
BY
Theophile Gautier
PUBLISHED BY BRENTANO'S AT UNION SQUARE, NEW YORK 1900
Copyright, 1890, by WORTHINGTON CO.
Copyright, 1899, by BRENTANO'S
The love that caught strange light from death's own eyes. And filled death's lips with fiery words and sighs. And, half asleep, let feed from veins of his Her close, red, warm snake's-mouth, Egyptian-wise:
And that great night of love more strange than this, When she that made the whole world's bale and bliss Made king of the whole world's desire a slave And killed him in mid-kingdom with a kiss.
Swinburne.
"Memorial verses on the death of Théophile Gautier"
Press of J. J. Little & Co. Astor Place, New York
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Poems (Greenwell)/Aspiration

EARLIER POEMS.
# Poems (Greenwell)/Consolation

CONSOLATION.
"They have healed also the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace. ... Is there no balm in Gilead? is there no physician there?"—Jer. viii. 11, 22.