OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Bridgewater Treatise

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Bridgewater Treatise."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
The Bridgewater Treatises (1833–36) are a series of eight works that were written by leading scientific figures appointed by the President of the Royal Society in fulfilment of a bequest made by Francis Henry Egerton, 8th Earl of Bridgewater, for a work on "the Power, Wisdom, and Goodness of God, as manifested in the Creation." The success of the series prompted authors to publish works in imitation. The most famous of these was by Charles Babbage and dubbed The Ninth Bridgewater Treatise: A Fragment (1836).
* Treatise I: The Adaptation of External Nature to the Moral and Intellectual Condition of Man (1833), by Thomas Chalmers, D.D.
* Treatise II: On The Adaptation of External Nature to the Physical Condition of Man (1833), by John Kidd, M.D.
* Treatise III: Astronomy and General Physics considered with reference to Natural Theology (1833), by William Whewell, D.D.
* Treatise IV: The hand, its Mechanism and Vital Endowments as evincing Design (1833), by Sir Charles Bell
* Treatise V: Animal and Vegetable Physiology considered with reference to Natural Theology (1834), by Peter Mark Roget
* Treatise VI: Geology and Mineralogy considered with reference to Natural Theology (1836), by William Buckland, D.D.
* Treatise VII: On the History, Habits and Instincts of Animals (1835), by William Kirby
* Treatise VIII: Chemistry, Meteorology, and the Function of Digestion, considered with reference to Natural Theology (1834), by William Prout, M.D.
# Braniff Airways v. Nebraska State Board of Equalization and Assessment

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinions

    Black
    Douglas

## Dissenting Opinion

    Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
347 U.S. 590
Braniff Airways v. Nebraska State Board of Equalization and Assessment
Argued: March 12, 1954. --- Decided: June 1, 1954
Mr. William J. Hotz, Sr., Omaha, Neb., for appellant.
Mr. C. C. Sheldon, Lincoln, Neb., for appellees.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Braniff Airways v. Nebraska State Board of Equalization and Assessment/Concurrence Black

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Black Douglas
* Dissenting Opinion Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
347 U.S. 590
Braniff Airways v. Nebraska State Board of Equalization and Assessment
Argued: March 12, 1954. --- Decided: June 1, 1954
Mr. Justice BLACK concurs in the result.
Mr. Justice JACKSON dissents for the reasons stated in his concurring opinion in Northwest Airlines v. State of Minnesota, 322 U.S. 292, 64 S.Ct. 950, 88 L.Ed. 1283.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Braniff Airways v. Nebraska State Board of Equalization and Assessment/Concurrence Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Black Douglas
* Dissenting Opinion Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
347 U.S. 590
Braniff Airways v. Nebraska State Board of Equalization and Assessment
Argued: March 12, 1954. --- Decided: June 1, 1954
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring.
Braniff Airways, in challenging the power of Nebraska to lay this ad valorem tax, claims only that its planes have no taxable situs in the State. It does not claim that no fraction of the aircraft, on an apportioned basis, is permanently in the State. Nor does it attack this apportionment formula.
My understanding of our decisions is that the power to lay an ad valorem tax turns on the permanency of the property in the State. All the property may be there or only a fraction of it. Property in transit, whether a plane discharging passengers or an automobile refueling, is not subject to an ad valorem tax. Property in transit may move so regularly and so continuously that part of it is always in the State. Then the fraction, but no more, may be taxed ad valorem.
I mention these elemental points to reserve explicitly the validity of the apportionment formula that serves as the basis of this ad valorem tax. The formula used presents substantial questions. What might be an adequate formula for a gross receipts tax might be inadequate for an ad valorem tax. Moreover, when we are faced with a due process question, we have a problem we may not delegate to Congress.
I do not think the Court takes a position contrary to what I have said. But there are passages in the opinion which blur the constitutional issues as they are blurred and confused in the interesting report of the Civil Aeronautics Board, H.R.Doc.No. 141, 79th Cong., 1st Sess., entitled Multiple Taxation of Air Commerce. Hence I have joined in the judgment of the Court but not in the opinion.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Branigin v. Duddleston

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
391 U.S. 364
Branigin et al. v. Duddleston et al.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
No. 1252. Argued: N/A --- Decided: May 20, 1968
284 F. Supp. 176, affirmed.
John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, and Charles S. White for appellants in No. 1252. Marshall F. Kizer for appellant in No. 1263.
Leslie Duvall and William H. Sparrenberger for appellees in both cases.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

* ↑ Together with No. 1263, Summers v. Duddleston et al., also on appeal from the same court.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Branigin v. Duddleston/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
391 U.S. 364
Branigin v. Duddleston
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, for reasons contained in his memorandum of March 4, 1968 (390 U.S. 932, 88 S.Ct. 1016, 19 L.Ed.2d 1124, sub nom. Branigin v. Grills), in which he acquiesced in the denial of stays of enforcement of the District Court's judgment, also acquiesces in the Court's affirmance of that judgment.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable/Joggis or Jogges

​Joggis or Jogges. The pillory. Jamieson says, "They punish delinquents, making them stand in 'jogges,' as they call their pillories." (The word is Yoke: Latin, jugum; French, joug; Anglo-Saxon, geoc; our jug, a jail.)
"Staune ane wholl Sabothe daye in ye joggis."—Glen: History of Dumbarton.
# Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable/John-a-Nokes

​John-a-Nokes [or Noakes (1 syl.)] A simpleton.
"John-a-Nokes was driving a cart toward Croydon, and by the way fell asleepe therein. Meane time a good fellow came by and stole away his two horses. [John] awakening and missing them, said, 'Either I am John-a-Nokes or I am not John-a-Nokes. If I am John-a-Nokes, then I have lost two horses; and if I am not John-a-Nokes, then I have found a cart.'"—Copley: Wits, Fits, and Fancies (1614).
# Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable/Jog

​Jog. Jog away; jog off; jog on. Get away; be off; keep moving. Shakespeare uses the word shog in the same sense—as, "Will you shog off?" (Henry V., ii. 1); and again in the same play, "Shall we shog?" (ii. 3). Beaumont and Fletcher use the same expression in The Coxcomb—"Come, prithee, let us shog off?" and again, in Pasquill and Katharine—"Thus it shogges" [goes]. In the Morte d'Arthur we have another variety—"He shokkes in sharpely" [rushes in]. The words seem to be connected with the Dutch schokken, to jolt, and the Anglo-Saxon scacan, to depart, to flee.
"Jog on a little faster, pri'thee, I'll take a nap and then be wi' thee." R. Lloyd: The Hare and the Tortoise.
To jog his memory, or Give his memory a jog. To remind one of something apparently forgotten. Jog is to shake or stir up. (Welsh, gogi, to shake; French, choquer; our shock, shake, etc.)
# Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable/Jog-trot

​Jog-trot. A slow but regular pace.
# Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable/John-a-Dreams

​ ​John-a-Dreams. A stupid, dreamy fellow, always in a brown study and half asleep.
"Yet I, A dull and muddy-mettled rascal, peak, Like John-a-dreams, unpregnant of my cause, And can say nothing." Shakespeare: Hamlet, ii. 2.
# Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable/John-a-Droynes

​John-a-Droynes. A foolish character in Whetstone's Promos and Cassandra (1578). Being seized by informers, he stands dazed, and suffers himself to be quietly cheated out of his money.
# Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable/Q

THE
DICTIONARY OF
PHRASE AND FABLE.
* Q.
* Q.E.D.
* Q.E.F.
* Q.P.
* Q.S.
* Q.V.
* Quack or Quack Doctor
* Quacks
* Quad
* Quadra
* Quadragesima Sunday
* Quadragesimals
* Quadrilateral
* Quadrille
* Quadriloge
* Quadrivium
* Quadroon
* Quadruple Alliance of 1674
* Quæstio Vexata
* Quail
* Quaint
* Quaker
* Qualm
* Quandary
* Quanquam or Cancan
* Quarantine
* Quarll
* Quarrel
* Quarrel
* Quarrel with your Bread and Butter
* Quarry
* Quarry
* Quart dHeure
* Quarter
* Quarter-days in England and Ireland
* Quarter Waggoner
* Quarters
* Quarterdeck
* Quartermaster
* Quartered
* Quarto
* Quarto-Decimans
* Quashee
* Quasi
* Quasimodo
* Quasimodo Sunday
* Quassia
* Quatorziennes
* Queen
* Queen
* Queen Anne is Dead
* Queen Anne's Bounty
* Queen Anne's Style
* Queen Consort
* Queen Dick
* Queen Dowager
* Queen Passion
* Queen Quintessence
* Queen Regnant
* Queen-Square Hermit
* Queen of Hearts
* Queen of Heaven
* Queen of the Dripping-pan
* Queen of the Eastern Archipelago
* Queen of the May
* Queen of the North
* Queen of the Northern Seas
* Queen's Bench
* Queen's College
* Queen's Day
* Queen's English
* Queen's Heads
* Queen's Pipe
* Queen's Ware
* Queen's Weather
* Queenhithe
* Queenstown
* Queer
* Queer Card
* Queer Chap
* Queer Street
* Quency
* Querelle dAllemand
* Quern-Biter
* Querno
* Querpo
* Questa Cortesissima
* Questa Gentilissima
* Question
* Questionists
* Questions and Commands
* Queubus
* Queue
* Queux
* Quey Calves are dear Veal
* Qui
* Qui sExcuse, sAccuse
* Qui-Tam
* Qui Vive?
* Quia Emptores
* Quibble
* Quick
* Quick Sticks
* Quickly
* Quicksand
* Quickset
* Quicksilver
* Quid
* Half a Quid
* Quids
* Quid Libet
* Quid of Tobacco
* Quid pro Quo
* Quid Rides
* Quiddity
* Quidnunc
* Quidnunkis
* Quietist
* Quietus
* Quill-drivers
* Quillet
* Quilp
* Quinapalus
* Quinbus Flestrin
* Quince
* Quinones
* Quinquagesima Sunday
* Quinsy
* Quintessence
* Quintilians
* Quip Modest
* Quis custodiet Custodes?
* Quisquiliæ
* Quit
* Quit Rent
* Quixada
* Quixote
* Quixote of the North
* Quixotic
* Quiz
* Quo Warranto
* Quod
* Quodling
* Quondam
* Quorum
* Quos Ego
* Quot
* Quota
* Quotem
# Brewer-Elliott Oil Gas Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
260 U.S. 77
Brewer-Elliott Oil Gas Company v. United States
Argued: Oct. 12 and 13, 1922. --- Decided: Nov 13, 1922
[Syllabus from pages 77-78 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. W. A. Ledbetter, S. P. Freeling, H. L. Stuart, and E. E. Blake, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellants.
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Riter, for the United States.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable/Z

THE
DICTIONARY OF
PHRASE AND FABLE.
* Zabian
* Zacocia
* Zadkiel
* Zadoc
* Zakarija ibn Muhammed
* Zakkum
* Zal
* Zans
* Zanoni
* Zany
* Zanny
* Zel
* Zelica
* Zelotes
* Zem
* Zenchis Khan
* Zend-Avesta
* Zenelophon
* Zenith, Nadir
* Zephon
* Zephyr
* Zeus
* Zeuxis
* Zif
* Zig
* Zig
* Zim and Jim
* Zimri
* Zincali
* Zindikites
* Zineura
* Zion
* Zist
* Zobeide
* Zodiac
* Zohar
* Zoilism
* Zoilos
* Zola-ise
* Zoliverein
* Zophiel
* Zoraida
* Zoraide or Zoraida
* Zounds!
* Zulal
* Zuleika
* Zulfagar
# Battle of the Boyn, or, King William crossing the Boyn Water (1)/Tarry Woo

TARRY WOO.
To its own Proper Tune.
T ARRY woo, tarry woo, Tarry woo is ill to ſpin, Card it well, card it well, Card it well ere ye begin. When 'tis carded, rov'd and ſpun, Then the wark is haflens done; But when woven, dreſt, and clean, It may be cleading for a queen.
Sing my bonny harmleſs ſheep, That feed upon the mountains ſteep Bleating ſweetly as they go, Thro' the winter's froſt and ſnow; ​ Hart and hind, and fallow deer,
No by ha'f ſo uſeful are; Frae kings to him that hauds the plow, Are all oblig'd to tarry woo.
Up ye ſhepherds, dance and ſkip, O'er the hills and valleys trip, Sing up the praiſe of tarry woo, Sing the flocks that bear it too: Harmleſs creatures, without blame, That clead the back and cram the wame, Keeps us warm and hearty fu'; Leeſe me on the tarry woo.
How happy is a ſhepherd's life! Far frae courts, and free of ſtrife, While the gimmers bleat and bae, And the lambkin's anſwer-Mae! No ſuch muſic to his ear, Of thief and fox he has no fear; Sturdy kent, and colly too, Well defend the tarry woo.
He lives content, and envies none; Not ev'n a monarch on his throne, Tho' he the royal ſceptre ſways, Has not ſweeter holy days. Who'd be a king, can ony tell, When a ſhepherd lives ſo well; Sings ſae well, and pays his due, With honeſt heart and carry woo.
# Battle of the Plains of Abraham Speech

* related portals: Speeches, Canada.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
The speech given by British General James Wolfe to his troops before the battle of the Plains of Abraham (battle of Quebec) on 13 September 1759.
I congratulate you, my brave countrymen and fellow soldiers, on the spirit and success with which you have executed this important part of our enterprise. The formidable Heights of Abraham are now surmounted; and the city of Quebec, the object of all our toils, now stands in full view before us. A perfidious enemy, who have dared to exasperate you by their cruelties, but not to oppose you on equal ground, are now constrained to face you on the open plain, without ramparts or intrenchments to shelter them.
You know too well the forces which compose their army to dread their superior numbers. A few regular troops from old France, weakened by hunger and sickness, who, when fresh, were unable to withstand the British soldiers, are their general’s chief dependence. Those numerous companies of Canadians, insolent, mutinous, unsteady, and ill-disciplined, have exercised his utmost skill to keep them together to this time; and, as soon as their irregular ardor is damped by one firm fire, they will instantly turn their backs, and give you no further trouble but in the pursuit. As for those savage tribes of Indians, whose horrid yells in the forest have struck many a bold heart with affright, terrible as they are with a tomahawk and scalping-knife to a flying and prostrate foe, you have experienced how little their ferocity is to be dreaded by resolute men upon fair and open ground: you can now only consider them as the just objects of a severe revenge for the unhappy fate of many slaughtered countrymen.
This day puts it into your power to terminate the fatigues of a siege which has so long employed your courage and patience. Possessed with a full confidence of the certain success which British valor must gain over such enemies, I have led you up these steep and dangerous rocks, only solicitous to show you the foe within your reach. The impossibility of a retreat makes no difference in the situation of men resolved to conquer or die; and, believe me, my friends, if your conquest could be bought with the blood of your general, he would most cheerfully resign a life which he has long devoted to his country.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Battle v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
209 U.S. 36
Battle v. United States
Argued: January 28, 1908. --- Decided: March 2, 1908
Mr. John Randolph Cooper for plaintiff in error.
Assistant Attorney General Cooley for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Battle of the Sexes

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Battle of the Sexes."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* The Battle of the Sexes (1928), a film directed by D. W. Griffith
* Battle of the Sexes (1955), a book of cartoons and jokes published anonymously
# Battle of the Boyn, or, King William crossing the Boyn Water (1)/The Virgin's Choice

THE VIRGIN'S CHOICE.
AS now my bloom comes on a pace, the ſwains begin to teaze me; But two, who claim the foremoſt place, try different ways to pleaſe me.
To judge aright, and chuſe the beſt, is not ſo ſoon decided; When both their merits are expreſt, may be leſs divided.
Palemon's flocks unnumber'd ſtray, he's rich beyond all meaſure; ​ Wou'd I but ſmile, be kind and gay,
he'd give me all his treaſure:
But then, our years ſo diſagree— ſo much as I remember, It is but May, I'm ſure with me, with him it is December.
Can I, who ſcarcely am in bloom, let froſt and ſnow be ſuing? "Twould ſpoil each rip'ning joy to come, bring ev'ry charm to ruin.
For dreſs and ſhow to touch my pride, my little heart is panting; But then—there's ſomething elſe beſide, I ſoon ſhould find was wanting.
Then, Colin, thou my heart ſhall gain, for thou would ne'er deceive me; And gray-hair'd wealth ſhall plead in vain for thou haſt moſt to give me.
My fancy paints thee full of charms, thou looks ſo young and tender, Love beats his new and fond alarms, to thee I now ſurrender.
# Baucis and Philemon

English-language translations of from book eight of Metamorphoses include:
* Baucis and Philemon, by Jonathan Swift
* Baucis and Philemon (1708), by Jonathan Swift
* Baucis and Philemon, collaborative translation
* The Story of Baucis and Philemon, by John Dryden
# Bauer & Cie v. O'Donnell

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Bauer & Cie. v. O'Donnell, 229 U.S. 1 (1913) was a United States Supreme Court decision involving licensing terms on patented works.
United States Supreme Court
229 U.S. 1
Bauer & Cie v. O'Donnell
Argued: April 10, 1913. --- Decided: May 26, 1913
Messrs. Edwin J. Prindle and Arthur Wright for Bauer & Cie.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 2-7 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Daniel W. Baker and Frank J. Hogan for O'Donnell.
Mr. Horace Pettit for the Victor Talking Machine Company.
Mr. Nathan Matthews for the Waltham Watch Company.
Messrs. Frederick P. Fish and Thomas W. Pelham for the Gilette Safety Razor Company.
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Burton v. West Jersey Ferry Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
114 U.S. 474
Burton v. West Jersey Ferry Company
Jerome Carty, B. Frank Clapp, and Mayer Suetzberger, for plaintiff in error.
Saml. Dickson and Richd. C. Dale, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority/Concurrence Stewart

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Stewart
* Dissenting Opinion Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
365 U.S. 715
Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority
Argued: Feb. 21 and 23, 1961. --- Decided: April 17, 1961
Mr. Justice STEWART, concurring.
I agree that the judgment must be reversed, but I reach that conclusion by a route much more direct than the one traveled by the Court. In upholding Eagle's right to deny service to the appellant solely because of his race, the Supreme Court of Delaware relied upon a statute of that State which permits the proprietor of a restaurant to refuse to serve 'persons whose reception or entertainment by him would be offensive to the major part of his customers * * *.' There is no suggestion in the record that the appellant as an individual was such a person. The highest court of Delaware has thus construed this legislative enactment as authorizing discriminatory classification based exclusively on color. Such a law seems to me clearly violative of the Fourteenth Amendment. I think, therefore, that the appeal was properly taken, and that the statute, as authoritatively construed by the Supreme Court of Delaware, is constitutionally invalid.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Burwell v. Cawood

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
43 U.S. 560
Burwell v. Cawood

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Stewart

## Dissenting Opinion

    Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
365 U.S. 715
Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority
Argued: Feb. 21 and 23, 1961. --- Decided: April 17, 1961
Mr. Louis L. Redding, Wilmington, Del., for appellant.
Sol. Gen. Archibald Cox, Washington, D.C., for the United States, as amicus curiae.
Mr. Clair John Killoran, Wilmington, Del., for appellee, The Wilmington Parking Authority.
Mr. Thomas Herlihy, Jr., Wilmington, Del., for appellee, Eagle Coffee Shoppe, Inc.
Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse