OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Executive Order 12327

more info.
Revoked by: Executive Order 12553, February 25, 1986
Signed by President Ronald Reagan Thursday, October 1, 1981
Federal Register page & date: 46 FR 48893, Monday, October 5, 1981
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and statutes of the United States of America, including Section 313 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1323), Section 118 of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7418), Section 4 of the Noise Control Act of 1972 (42 U.S.C. 4903), and Section 6001 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6961), and in order to provide for the immediate relocation and temporary housing of Haitian nationals, who are located in the State of Florida and presently in the custody of the United States, at a Federal facility known as Fort Allen, located in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and having determined it to be in the paramount interest of the United States to exempt Fort Allen from all the requirements otherwise imposed on it by the said statutes, it is hereby ordered as follows:
1-101. Consistent with the provisions of subsection (a) of Section 313 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1323(a)), each and every effluent source located at Fort Allen is exempted from compliance with the provisions of that Act; except that no exemption is hereby granted from Sections 306 and 307 of that Act (33 U.S.C. 1316 and 1317).
1-102. Consistent with the provisions of subsection (b) of Section 118 of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7418(b)), each and every particular emission source located at Fort Allen is exempted from compliance with the provisions of that Act; except that no exemption is hereby granted from Section 111 and 112 of that Act (42 U.S.C. 7411 and 7412).
1-103. Consistent with the provisions of subsection 4(b) of the Noise Control Act of 1972, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4903(b)), each and every single activity or facility, including noise emission sources or classes thereof, located at Fort Allen, are exempted from compliance with the provisions of that Act; except that no exemption is hereby granted from Sections 6, 17 and 18 of that Act (42 U.S.C. 4906, 4916 and 4917).
1-104. Consistent with the provisions of Section 6001 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6961), each and every solid waste management facility located at Fort Allen is exempted from compliance with the provisions of that Act.
1-105. The exemptions granted by this Order shall be for the one-year period beginning October 2, 1981, and ending October 1, 1982.
RONALD REAGAN The White House, October 1, 1981.
[Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 8:46 a.m., October 2, 1981]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 1233

more info.
Signed by President William H. Taft Thursday, July 28, 1910
1910 CSR 113
Mr. Charles W. Fowle, of Massachusetts, may be appointed without examination as a clerk in the Department of State, as recommended by the Secretary of State with the concurrence of the Civil Service Commission, because of his services for the past four years as clerk in the American embassy at Constantinople, during which he acquired such special knowledge of the affairs in the Near East that his transfer to the Department of State will be of distinct advantage to the service.
The White House,
    July 28, 1910.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 12330

more info.
Signed by President Ronald Reagan Thursday, October 15, 1981
Federal Register page & date: 46 FR 50921, Friday, October 16, 1981
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Statutory Pay Systems. Pursuant to the provisions of subchapter I of Chapter 53 of Title 5 of the United States Code, the rates of basic pay and salaries are adjusted, as set forth at the schedules attached hereto and made a part hereof, for the following statutory pay systems:
(a) The General Schedule (5 U.S.C. 5332(a)) at Schedule 1;
(b) The Foreign Service Schedule (22 U.S.C. 3963) at Schedule 2;
(c) The Schedules for the Department of Medicine and Surgery, Veterans Administration (38 U.S.C. 4107) at Schedule 3; and
(d) The rates of basic pay for the Senior Executive Service (5 U.S.C. 5382) at Schedule 4.
Sec. 2. Pay and Allowances for Members of the Uniformed Services. Sections 101 and 102 of the Uniformed Services Pay Act of 1981 provides for adjustments in the rates of monthly basic pay (37 U.S.C. 203(a) and (c)), the rates of basic allowances for subsistence (37 U.S.C. 402), and the rates of basic allowances for quarters (37 U.S.C. 403(a)), as set forth at Schedule 5 attached hereto and made a part hereof, for members of the uniformed services.
Sec. 3. Executive Salaries. The Executive Salary Cost-of-Living Adjustment Act (Public Law 94-82, 89 Stat. 419) provides for adjustments in rates of pay and salaries, as set forth at the schedules attached hereto and made a part hereof, for the following:
(a) The Vice President (3 U.S.C. 104) and the Executive Schedule (5 U.S.C. 53125316) at Schedule 6;
(b) Congressional Salaries (2 U.S.C. 31) at Schedule 7; and
(c) Judicial Salaries (28 U.S.C. 5, 44(d), 135, 173, 213, 252, 792(b), and 11 U.S.C. 68(a), and Section 401(a), 404(a), 404(b), and 404(d) of Public Law 95-598) at Schedule 8.
Sec. 4. Effective Date. The adjustments in rates of monthly basic pay and allowances for subsistence and quarters for members of uniformed services shall be effective on October 1, 1981. All other adjustments of salary or pay shall be effective on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after October 1, 1981.
Sec. 5. Superseded Executive Orders. Executive Order No. 12248 of October 16, 1980 and Executive Order No. 12249 of October 25, 1980 are superseded.
RONALD REAGAN The White House, October 15, 1981.
[Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 10:,52 a.m., October 15, 1981] Note: The schedules are printed in the Federal Register of October 16, 1981.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Blair/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
304 U.S. 579
Ex parte Blair

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Blackburn/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
​By the Court, Lacy, J. Whether the petitioner's rights are vested or not, so that the legislature cannot remove the seat of justice without paying him for his lots and improvements, and complying with the contract made with the county court, is a question we are not now called on to decide, because the point is not properly before us. It is clear, both upon authority and reason, that he is not entitled, by the remedy sought, to a writ of prohibition. The county court, both by the constitution and statutes, have unquestionable jurisdiction over the subject matter, for the removal of the seat of justice; and this being the case, a writ of prohibition will not lie. It was expressly stated by this Court, in the case of Williams, ex parte, where the whole doctrine upon writs of prohibition was elaborately examined, and the principles and manner of proceeding under it accurately laid down and defined, that “the writ lay where an inferior court was proceeding without jurisdiction, or where the jurisdiction belonged to another court, or where the inferior court transcended its jurisdiction by holding plea for too large an amount, or where the plaintiff had one demand, and split it into several actions, to give an inferior court jurisdiction, or where the judges proceeded in cases where they were prohibited to do so by an act of Parliament.” These principles being established, it is equally clear, upon authority and reason, that the writ will never lie to a court having cognizance of the cause, or jurisdiction of the subject matter, on a suggestion of erroneous proceeding. The rule at common law is, that no prohibition lay to an inferior court, for matters arising out of their jurisdiction, until that matter had been pleaded, and the plea refused. In the present case, the county court unquestionably possesses jurisdiction over the subject matter, and therefore the writ will not lie, and this application must be denied.
# Ex parte Blair

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
304 U.S. 579
Ex parte Blair
Messrs. George Pfeil, of New York City, Poffenbarger & Poffenbarger, of Charleston, W. Va., and John Levi Clark of New York City, for petitioners.
For opinion below, see 95 F.2d 995.
The motion to deter consideration is denied. The motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is denied.
Mr. Justice Roberts took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Bradstreet (29 U.S. 102)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
29 U.S. 102
Ex Parte Martha Bradstreet; in the Matter of James Jackson Ex Dem. Martha Bradstreet
Mr. Chief Justice Marshall delivered the opinion of the Court.
The court is unanimously of opinion that the rule ought not to be granted.
This is not a case in which the judge has refused to sign a bill of exceptions. The judge has signed such a bill as he thinks correct. If the court had granted a rule upon the district judge to sign a bill of exceptions, the judge could have returned that he had performed that duty. But the object of the rule is, to oblige the judge to sign a particular bill of exceptions, which had been offered to him. The court granted the rule to show cause; and the judge has shown cause, by saying he has done all that can be required from him; and that the bill offered to him is not such a bill as he can sign.
Nothing can be more manifest, than that the court cannot order him to sign such a bill of exceptions. The person who offers a bill of exceptions ought to present such a one as the judge can sign. The course to be pursued is, either to endeavour to draw up a bill, by agreement, which the judge can sign; or to prepare a bill to which there will be no objection, and present it to the judge.
The court will observe, that there is something in this proceeding which they cannot, and which they ought not to sanction. A bill of exceptions is handed to the judge several weeks after the trial of the cause, and he is asked to correct it from memory. The law requires that a bill of exceptions should be tendered at the trial. But the usual practice is to request the judge to note down in writing the exceptions, and afterwards, during the session of the court, to hand him the bill of exceptions, and submit it to his correction from his notes. If he is to resort to his memory, it should be handed to him immediately, or in a reasonable time after the trial. It would be dangerous to allow a bill of exceptions of matters dependent on memory, at a distant period, when he may not accurately recollect them. And the judge ought not to allow it.
If the party intends to take a bill of exceptions, he should give notice to the judge at the trial; and if he does not file it at the trial, he should move the judge to assign a reasonable time within which he may file it. A practice to sign it after the term must be understood to be a matter of consent between the parties, unless the judge has made an express order in the term, allowing such a period to prepare it.
It is ordered by the court that the mandamus as prayed for be, and the same is hereby refused; and that the rule heretofore granted in this cause be, and the same is hereby discharged.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Blackburn

Mr. Blackburn petitioned the Arkansas Supreme Court for a writ of prohibition to a county court. In Ex parte Blackburn, 5 Ark. 21 (1843), the supreme court refused: the county court had jurisdiction when it acted, so prohibition would not lie.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
5 Ark. 21
Ex parte BLACKBURN
Writ of Prohibition to County Court of Scott County
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
This was an application, upon the part of the petitioner, to this Court for a Writ of prohibition, to be directed to the county court of Scott county, preventing them from removing the seat of justice, and records of that court, from Boonville to Wynfield. The facts set out in favor of the writ showed, that the petitioner was the legal owner and proprietor of certain lots in the town of Boonville, on which were erected valuable improvements, and that the town was originally located and laid out upon ten acres of land, donated by Gilbert Marshall and David Titsworth to the commissioners of said county, for the purpose of establishing a seat of justice thereon, and that they executed their bond for title, and that Marshall purchased a lot of the commissioners, which bond was afterwards taken up by the petitioner, as assignee of Marshall, by executing a deed in fee, in lieu thereof, and that he also became the purchaser of the lot originally owned by Marshall. The legislature had recently passed an act ordering the removal of the seat of justice from Boonville to Wynfield, and directing the records of the county and circuit courts to be transferred to the latter place, and the seat of justice to be permanently fixed there, until otherwise changed by law. It was contended, in behalf of the petitioner, that this act was unconstitutional, because it deprived him ​of vested rights, without making any adequate compensation for the loss he would sustain.
[Opinion of the court by Justice THOMAS J. LACY.]
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Bradstreet

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Ex parte Bradstreet."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Ex parte Bradstreet (29 U.S. 102), ( 7 L.Ed. 796 ), ( 4 Pet. 102 )
* Ex parte Bradstreet (32 U.S. 634), ( 8 L.Ed. 810 ), ( 7 Pet. 634 )
# Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the G.I. Bill

Delivered on 22 May 2008.
Mister President:
At the end of the Second World War, this country thanked a generation of returning heroes for their service by giving them the chance to attend college on the G.I. Bill. Stanley Dunham, my grandfather, was one of the young men who got that chance. More than half a century later, we face the largest homecoming since then, at a time when the costs of college have never been higher.
And Senator Webb, a former Marine himself, along with the leaders of both parties, have introduced a 21st Century G.I. Bill that would give this generation of returning heroes the same chance at an affordable college education that we gave the Greatest Generation. We have asked so much of our brave young men and women. We have sent them on tour after tour of duty to Iraq and Afghanistan. They have risked their lives, and left their families and served this country brilliantly. It is our duty – our moral duty as Americans – to serve them as well as they have served us.
This G.I. Bill is an important way to do that, and I know there are some who have argued that this will have an impact on retention rates. I firmly believe – and I think it's been argued eloquently on this side – that in the longterm, this will strengthen our military, and improve the number of people who are interested in volunteering to serve.
I respect Senator John McCain's service to our country. He is one of those heroes of which I speak. But I can't understand why he would line up behind the President in his opposition to this G.I. Bill. I can't believe why he believes it is too generous to our veterans. I could not disagree with him and the President more on this issue. There are many issues that lend themselves to partisan posturing, but giving our veterans the chance to go to college should not be one of them.
I'm proud that so many Democrats and Republicans have come together to support this. I would also note that that first G.I. Bill was not just good for the veterans and their families, but it was good for our entire country; that is helped to build our middle class; that whenever we invest in the best and the brightest, that all of us end up benefiting. All of us end up prospering. I urge my Senate colleagues to give those who have defended America the chance to achieve their dream, and I commend Senator Webb, and the many veteran service organizations who have worked so tirelessly on this issue.
Thank you very much, Mr. President. I yield the balance of my time.
# Executive Order 12937

more info.
See the Notes section for a list of Executive Orders affected by or related to the issuance of this Executive Order.
Signed by President William J. Clinton Thursday, November 10, 1994
Federal Register page & date: 59 FR 59097, Tuesday, November 15, 1994
Executive Order 12937 of November 10, 1994
Declassification of Selected Records Within the National Archives of the United States
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:
Section 1. The records in the National Archives of the United States referenced in the list accompanying this order are hereby declassified.
Sec. 2. The Archivist of the United States shall take such actions as are necessary to make such records available for public research no later than 30 days from the date of this Order, except to the extent that the head of an affected agency and the Archivist have determined that specific information within such records must be protected from disclosure pursuant to an authorized exemption to the Freedom of Information Act 5 U.S.C. 552, other than the exemption that pertains to national security information.
Sec. 3. Nothing contained in this order shall create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable by any party against the United States, its agencies or instrumentalities, its officers or employees, or any other person.
WILLIAM J. CLINTON THE WHITE HOUSE, November 10, 1994.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 12939

more info.
Signed by President William J. Clinton Tuesday, November 22, 1994
Federal Register page & date: 59 FR 61231, Tuesday, November 29, 1994
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1440 of title 8, United States Code, and in order to provide expedited naturalization for aliens and noncitizen nationals who served in an active-duty status in the Armed Forces of the United States during the period of the Persian Gulf Conflict, it is hereby ordered as follows:
    For the purpose of determining qualification for the exception from the usual requirements for naturalization, the period of Persian Gulf Conflict military operations in which the Armed Forces of the United States were engaged in armed conflict with a hostile force commenced on August 2, 1990, and terminated on April 11, 1991. Those persons serving honorably in active-duty status in the Armed Forces of the United States during this period are eligible for naturalization in accordance with the statutory exception to the naturalization requirements, as provided in section 1440(b) of title 8, United States Code.
William J. Clinton The White House, November 22, 1994.
[Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 10:42 a.m., November 28, 1994]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 12940

more info.
Signed by President William J. Clinton Monday, November 28, 1994
Federal Register page & date: 59 FR 61519, Wednesday, November 30, 1994
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including sections 3301 and 3302 of title 5, United States Code, and having determined that it is necessary and warranted by conditions of good administration that certain positions in the Department of Agriculture continue to be excluded from the coverage of section 2302 of title 5, United States Code, and excepted from the competitive service because of their confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating character, in order to ensure their deep involvement in the development and advocacy of Administration proposals and policies and to ensure their effective and vigorous implementation, and as a result of a reorganization of the Department of Agriculture carried out pursuant to Public Law 103-354, it is hereby ordered that subsection (c) of section 6.8 of Civil Service Rule VI (5 C.F.R. 6.8) is revised to read as follows:
    "(c) Within the Department of Agriculture, positions the incumbents of which serve as State Executive Directors of the Consolidated Farm Service Agency and positions the incumbents of which serve as State Directors or State Directors-at-Large for Rural Economic and Community Development shall be listed in Schedule C for all grades of the General Schedule."
This order supersedes Executive Order No. 12300.
William J. Clinton The White House, November 28, 1994.
[Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 11:09 a.m., November 29, 1994]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse