OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States v. Southmayd

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
50 U.S. 637
United States v. Southmayd

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Southern Ute Tribe or Band of Indians

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
402 U.S. 159
United States v. Southern Ute Tribe or Band of Indians
Certiorari to the United States Court of Claims
No. 515. Argued: March 1, 1971 --- Decided: April 26, 1971
Respondent's claims for compensation and accounting are barred by res judicata since they relate to land "formerly owned or claimed by [the Confederated Bands of Utes] in western Colorado, ceded to [the United States] by the Act of June 15, 1880" and thus were subject to a final settlement reduced to a consent judgment, to which respondent was a party, made in 1950. Pp. 161-174.
191 Ct. Cl. 1, 423 F. 2d 346, reversed.
BRENNAN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and BLACK, HARLAN, STEWART, WHITE, MARSHALL, and BLACKMUN, JJ., joined. DOUGLAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, post, p. 174.
Lawrence G. Wallace argued the cause for the United States. On the briefs were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Kashiwa, Peter L. Strauss, and Edmund B. Clark.
Glen A. Wilkinson argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Richard A. Baenan.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Price

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Price."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Price (50 U.S. 83)
* United States v. Price (116 U.S. 43)
* United States v. Price (361 U.S. 304)
* United States v. Price (383 U.S. 787)
See also Price v. United States.
# United States v. Price (116 U.S. 43)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
116 U.S. 43
United States v. Price
Argued: December 14, 1885. ---

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/21st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 6

Chap. VI.—An Act to amend an act, entitled “An act to provide for paying to the states of Missouri, Mississippi, and Alabama, three per centum of the net proceeds arising from the sale of the public lands within the same.”
Act of May 3, 1822, c. 46. States of Missouri, Mississippi and Alabama exonerated from obligation to render annual account of, &c.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That so much of an act, entitled “An act to provide for paying to the states of Missouri, Mississippi, and Alabama, three per centum of the net proceeds arising from the sale of the public lands within the same,” approved the third of May, eighteen hundred and twenty-two, as requires an annual account of the application of the said three per centum, to be transmitted to the Secretary of the Treasury, be, and the same is hereby repealed.
Approved, January 19, 1831.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/21st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 39

Chap. XXXIX.—An Act for the relief of certain importers of foreign merchandise.
The Secretary of the Treasury authorized to refund certain duties. Act of May 28, 1830, ch. 147, sec. 3. Proviso.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of the Treasury shall be, and he is hereby, authorized to extend relief to any importer of foreign merchandise who may have been charged, under the provisions of the third section of the act, entitled “An act for the more effectual collection of the duties on imports,” passed the twenty-eighth day of May, one thousand eight hundred and thirty, with any duty in addition to the duties existing on such merchandise previous to the passage of said act, to the amount of such additional duty: Provided, Said merchandise shall have been imported previous to the first day of January last:Proviso. Provided, also, That no person shall be entitled to the relief authorized to be given by this act, who, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, by himself, or his agents, factors, or correspondents, could have complied with the provisions of the said third section of said act; and the Secretary of the Treasury shall require and receive satisfactory evidence, from every person claiming the benefits of this act, that such diligence has been used, and that he has acted bona fide, and without any intent to violate or evade the provisions of said third section, before he shall grant the relief herein provided.
Approved, March 2, 1831.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/21st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 40

Chap. XL.—An Act for the sale of the lands in the state of Illinois reserved for the use of the salt springs on the Vermillion river, in that state.
State of Illinois authorized to sell certain lands.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the state of Illinois shall be, and is hereby, authorized and empowered to cause to be sold and conveyed, in such manner and on such terms and conditions as the legislature of said state has or may direct, the whole or any part of the lands reserved and set apart by the President of the United States, on the twenty-ninth day of March, eighteen hundred and twenty-five, for the use of the salt works on the Vermillion river, in said state, and to apply the proceeds of such sale to such objects as the legislature of said state has or may direct:Proviso. Provided, Said land shall not be sold for less than one dollar and twenty-five cents per acre.
Approved, March 2, 1831.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/21st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 58

Chap. LVIII.—An Act making appropriations for carrying on certain roads and works of internal improvement, and for providing for surveys.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the following sums be, and the same are hereby, appropriated to the several objects respectively herein named, to be applied during the year one thousand eight hundred and thirty-one, the same to be paid out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated, viz:
Detroit, &c.For continuing the road from Detroit towards Chicago, Michigan, ten thousand dollars.
For continuing the road from Detroit to fort Gratiot, Michigan, eight thousand dollars.
For continuing the road from Detroit to Saganaw bay, eight thousand dollars.
T. S. Knapp.For arrearage due to T. S. Knapp, fourteen dollars and seventy-five cents.
Surveys, &c. 1824, ch. 46.For defraying the expenses incidental to making examinations and surveys under the act of the thirtieth of April, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-four, twenty-five thousand dollars.
Navigation of Ohio and Mississippi rivers.For improving the navigation of the Ohio and Mississippi rivers, to be expended under the existing laws, fifty thousand dollars.
That the sum of one hundred and fifty thousand dollars be, and the same is hereby appropriated to the improvement of the navigation of the ​Ohio and Mississippi rivers from Pittsburg to New Orleans, in removing the obstructions in the channels at the shoal places and ripples, and by such other means as may be deemed best for the deepening of the channels of the Ohio river, which said sum shall be expended under the direction of the President of the United States, by the superintendent appointed to execute said works of improvement;Sum expended under direction of the President of the United States. and the President is hereby authorized and required to take bond with approved security in fifty thousand dollars conditioned for the faithful performance of the duties required of him under such instructions as may be given him for the improvement of the navigation of said rivers, and that an officer of engineers be associated with said superintendent, with authority to suspend the operation of any work, or payment of any account, until the order of the President is received.
Road in Arkansas.To open a road from Washington, in Arkansas territory, to Jackson, in said territory, fifteen thousand dollars.
Approved, March 2, 1831.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/21st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 41

Chap. XLI.—An Act for the relief of the citizens of Shawneetown.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That it shall and may be lawful for any purchaser, the assignee or legal representative of any purchaser, ​Certain purchasers entitled to re-enter certain lots.of any in or out-lot or lots in the town of Shawneetown in the state of Illinois, which lot or lots may have reverted for the non-payment of the purchase money, to re-enter the same lot or lots which may have so reverted, with the register and receiver of the district of Shawneetown, at any time within six months after the passage of this act, upon the following terms and conditions, to wit:Conditions. by paying, in addition to what has heretofore been paid upon each in-lot, five dollars, and upon each out-lot, one dollar and twenty-five cents per acre.
Grant to trustees, of all vacant grounds, &c.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That there be, and hereby is, granted to the trustees of the town of Shawneetown, and their successors in office, for ever, in trust, to sell, or otherwise dispose of, for the purpose of graduating and paving the river bank within the limits of said town, all the vacant ground not necessary for streets, all the in or out-lots within the bounds of said town, which remain unsold, and all such as may remain unsold under the provisions of the first section of this act; this act to be carried into effect under the direction of the commissioner of the general land office.
Approved, March 2, 1831.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/21st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 42

Chap. XLII.—An Act to authorize the Secretary of War to purchase an additional quantity of land for the fortifications at fort Washington, upon the river Potomac.
Purchase of land authorized.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of War be, and he is hereby, authorized to purchase, in fee-simple, from the executrix or trustees of William Dudley Digges, deceased, a certain piece of land required for the complete defence of the works at fort Washington, on the Potomac, according to a survey of the same, deposited in the topographical bureau, at Washington:Proviso. Provided, The said purchase can be effected for the release of the amount of a judgment against William Dudley Digges, deceased, for thirteen thousand three hundred and sixty-nine dollars and eighty-seven cents, with interest from ninth June, one thousand eight hundred and nineteen, until paid, and costs, which the sureties of the late Robert Brent have assigned to the United States: And provided further,Proviso. That those who are legally authorized to convey the said land shall make and execute a good title thereto, in fee-simple, with an acquittance of all claims against the United States, for the previous use or occupation of all or any portion of the premises, or for any alleged injury to an adjacent fishery, the right and title to which is to be released to the United States.
Release of judgment.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That, upon the completion of the above purchase, on the terms and conditions specified, the proper officer of the United States shall be, and he hereby is, authorized to enter up satisfaction upon the judgment aforesaid.
Approved, March 2, 1831.
# Valperga/Volume 2

VALPERGA:
OR, THE
LIFE AND ADVENTURES
OF
CASTRUCCIO,
PRINCE OF LUCCA.
BY THE AUTHOR OF "FRANKENSTEIN."
IN THREE VOLUMES. VOL. II.
LONDON:
PRINTED FOR G. AND W. B. WHITTAKER, AVE-MARIA-LANE.
1823.
page
PRINTED BY RICHARD TAYLOR, SHOE-LANE, LONDON.
* Chapter I (XV)
* Chapter II (XVI)
* Chapter III (XVII)
* Chapter IV (XVIII)
* Chapter V (XIX)
* Chapter VI (XX)
* Chapter VII (XXI)
* Chapter VII (XXII)
* Chapter IX (XXIII)
* Chapter X (XXIV)
* Chapter XI (XXV)
* Chapter XII (XXVI)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Valperga/Volume 1/Preface

PREFACE.
The accounts of the Life of Castruccio known in England, are generally taken from Macchiavelli's romance concerning this chief. The reader may ﬁnd a detail of his real adventures in Sismondi’s delightful publication, Histoire des Republiques Italiennes de l'Age Moyen. In addition to this work, I have consulted Tegrino's Life of Castruccio, and Giovanni Villani’s Florentine Annals.
The following is a translation from the article respecting him in Moreri.
"Castruccio Castracani, one of the most celebrated captains of his time, lived in the fourteenth century. He was of the family of the Antelminelli of Lucca; and, having at a very early age borne arms in favour of the Ghibelines, he was exiled by the Guelphs. He served not long after in the armies of Philip ​king of France, who made war on the Flemings. In the sequel he repassed the Alps; and, having joined Uguccione Faggiuola, chief of the Ghibelines of Tuscany, he reduced Lucca, Pistoia, and several other towns. He became the ally of the emperor Louis of Bavaria, against pope John XXII, Robert king of Naples, and the Florentines. Louis of Bavaria gave him the investiture of Lucca under the denomination of Duke, together with the title of Senator of Rome. Nothing seemed able to oppose his courage and good fortune, when he was taken off by a premature death in 1330, in the forty-seventh year of his age."
The dates here given are somewhat different from those adopted in the following narrative.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Sherman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
98 U.S. 565
United States v. Sherman
ERROR to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. William A. Maury for the relator.
The Attorney-General, contra.
MR. JUSTICE STRONG delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Sherwood

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
312 U.S. 584
United States v. Sherwood
Argued: March 6, 7, 1941. --- Decided: March 31, 1941
Messrs. Robert H. Jackson, Atty. Gen., and Sidney J. Kaplan, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Milton U. Copland, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Shimer

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
367 U.S. 374
United States v. Shimer
Argued: April 27, 1961. --- Decided: June 12, 1961
Mr. Wayne G. Barnett, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Edward Davis, Philadelphia, Pa., submitted on brief, for respondent.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Shields

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
153 U.S. 88
United States v. Shields
Asst. Atty. Gen. Dodge, for the United States.
C. C. Lancaster, for appellee.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/28th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 26

Chap. XXVI.—An Act to amend the act entitled “An act making appropriations for the naval service for the fiscal year ending the thirtieth day of June, one thousand eight hundred and forty-five.”
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,3d sec. act 17th June 1844, ch. 107, not applicable to officers on foreign stations, until after receipt of information of its passage. That the third section of the act entitled “An act making appropriations for the naval service for the fiscal year ending the thirtieth day of June, one thousand eight hundred and forty-five,” approved June seventeen, one thousand eight hundred and forty-four, shall not be understood or construed to apply to the claim of an officer employed on a foreign station who would be entitled, under the provisions of previous acts of Congress, to receive the pay of a higher grade, while temporarily performing the duties of such higher grade, until information of the passage of the said act shall have been received on board of the vessel to which such officer was or is attached.
Approved, February 26, 1845.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/28th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 39

Chap. XXXIX.—An Act to change the time of holding the Federal courts in Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama and Louisiana.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Circuit and district courts in Kentucky. That from and after the passage of this act the fall sessions of the circuit and district courts of the said United States for the district of Kentucky, heretofore commenced and held on the third Monday in November, annually, shall ​instead thereof be commenced and held the second Monday in November, annually.Circuit courts in N. Carolina. S. Carolina. That the circuit courts of the United States for the district of North Carolina shall be held at Raleigh on the Monday preceding the first Monday in December, and after the year eighteen hundred and forty-five on the second Monday in March. That the spring term of said court shall be held in and for the district of South Carolina at Charleston, on the Wednesday preceding the fourth Monday in March, after the ensuing term shall have been held at the time no appointed by law.Georgia. That the spring term of said court shall be held in [and] for the district of Georgia at Savannah, on the second Monday in April after the ensuing term shall have been held at the time now appointed by law.Southern district of Alabama. That the circuit court of the United States for the southern district of Alabama, shall commence its spring term at Mobile, on the second Monday of April in each and every year after the ensuing spring term of said court shall have been held at the time now appointed by law.Louisiana. And the circuit court for the district of Louisiana shall commence its spring term at New Orleans on the fourth Monday of April in each and every year, after the ensuing spring term of said court shall have been held at the time now appointed by law.Process returnable, how. And all actions, suits, appeals, recognizances, processes, writs and proceedings whatever, pending, or which may be pending in said courts, or returnable thereto, shall have day therein, and be heard, tried, proceeded with, and decided, in like manner as if the time of holding said courts or sessions had not been hereby altered.
Approved, March 1, 1845.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/28th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 4

Chap. IV.—An Act confirming and assenting to an act of the Legislature of Virginia, entitled “An act further to amend the act incorporating the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company.”
Act of March 3, 1837, ch. 51. Act confirmed. Appendix No. 2, post, 802. Proviso.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the act of the Legislature of Virginia, entitled “An act further to amend the act incorporating the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company,” which was passed on the twentieth day of January, in the year one thousand eight hundred and forty-four, be, and the same is hereby, ratified, confirmed, and assented to: Provided, That this assent and confirmation shall not be so construed as to bind the United States beyond their interest in the stock in said company, nor as either affirming or denying the validity of the rights or lines of the State of Maryland referred to in the third section of the said act of Virginia:Further proviso. Provided also, That nothing herein contained shall be held or construed to impair the rights of any individual or corporation derived from the original act of incorporation of the said Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company.
Approved, February 7, 1845.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/28th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 35

Chap. XXXV.—An Act to change the time for holding the Circuit and Criminal Courts in the county of Washington.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Time of holding fall term of circuit court changed. That the Circuit Court of the United States for the county of Washington, District of Columbia, shall hereafter be held on the third Monday of October of each year, instead of the fourth Monday of November designated by law.
Times of holding criminal court now fixed.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That hereafter there shall be but three terms of the criminal court for Washington county, in the District of Columbia, instead of the four terms of said court now fixed by law; and that said three terms hereafter shall commence and be held on the first Monday in March, the third Monday in June, and the first Monday in December, in each and every year.Process returnable on days now fixed. All process whatsoever in the said criminal court now issued or which may be issued in the county of Washington, in said District, returnable to the days now fixed by law ​for said county, shall be returnable and returned on the days for holding said criminal court, prescribed by this statute.
Approved, March 1, 1845.