OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Securities and Exchange Commission v. Central-Illinois Securities Corporation Streeter

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
338 U.S. 96
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Central-Illinois Securities Corporation Streeter
Argued: Jan. 12, 13, 1949. --- Decided: June 27, 1949
[Syllabus from pages 96-98 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Roger S. Foster, for Securities & Exchange Commission, washington, D.C.
Mr. Lawrence R. Condon, New York City, for Thomas W. Streeter and others.
Mr. Francis H. Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., for Home Ins. Co. and others.
Mr. Louis Boehm, New York City, for Lucille White and others.
Mr. Alfred Berman, New York City, for Central-Illinois Securities Corp. and others.
Mr. Justice RUTLEDGE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Stroble v. California/Dissent Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Douglas Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
343 U.S. 181
Stroble v. California
Argued: March 6, 1952. --- Decided: April 7, 1952
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, with whom Mr. Justice BLACK concurs, dissenting.
My views on the illegality of confessions obtained between the time of arrest and arraignment are contained in Watts v. Indiana, 338 U.S. 49, 56-57, 69 S.Ct. 1347, 1351, 93 L.Ed. 1801; Turner v. Com. of Pennsylvania, 338 U.S. 62, 66-67, 69 S.Ct. 1352, 1353, 1354, 93 L.Ed. 1810; Harris v. South Carolina, 338 U.S. 68, 71-73, 69 S.Ct. 1354, 1356, 1357, 93 L.Ed. 1815. The practice of obtaining confessions prior to arraignment breeds the third degree and the inquisition. As long as it remains lawful for the police to hold persons incommunicado, coerced confessions will infect criminal trials in violation of the commands of due process of law.
The facts of this case illustrate the evils of this police practice. While the defendant was being held by the police prior to his arraignment, a lawyer tried to see him. The police refused the lawyer's repeated requests. It was only after a confession was obtained that the lawyer was allowed to talk with the prisoner. This was lawless conduct, condemned by the Supreme Court of California. It was not only lawless conduct; it was conduct that produced a confession.
This confession as well as subsequently obtained confessions were used at the trial. The fact that the later confessions may have been lawfully obtained or used is immaterial. For once an illegal confession infects the trial, the verdict of guilty must be set aside no matter how free of taint the other evidence may be. Malinski v. New York, 324 U.S. 401, 65 S.Ct. 781, 89 L.Ed. 1029.
Moreover, the fact that the accused started talking shortly after he was arrested and prior to the time he was taken before the District Attorney does not save the case. That talk was accompanied or preceded by blows and kicks of the police; and the Supreme Court of California assumed that it was part and parcel of the first confession obtained through 'physical abuse or psychological torture or a combination of the two.'

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Stripe v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
269 U.S. 503
Stripe v. United States
Argued: Nov. 23, 1925. --- Decided: Jan 11, 1926
In this case there is presented the question whether, in the distribution of the assets of Johnson Shipyards Corporation among its creditors by receivers appointed in an equity suit, the United States, under R. S. § 3466 (Comp. St. § 6372), is entitled to have its claim against the corporation for taxes first satisfied. The facts (300 F. 952) are in all respects similar to those in Price v. United States, 269 U.S. 492, 46 S.C.t. 180, 70 L. Ed. 373, decided this day. The question of law involved is identical. The United States is entitled to priority.
Decree affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Stroble v. California/Dissent Frankfurter

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Douglas Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
343 U.S. 181
Stroble v. California
Argued: March 6, 1952. --- Decided: April 7, 1952
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER, dissenting.
One of the petitioner's grounds for attacking his conviction is that the trial lacked fundamental fairness because the district attorney himself initiated the intrusion of the press into the process of the trial. Such misconduct, the petitioner contends, subverted the adjudicatory process by which guilt is determined in Anglo-Saxon countries so as to offend what the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects. The issue was raised after verdict, and the Supreme Court of California might have disposed of the claim by ruling that it had not been made at the stage of the proceeding required by State law. That court, however, chose not to do so. It permitted the petitioner to invoke the Due Process Clause and thereby tendered a federal constitutional issue, as this Court recognizes, for our disposition.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Stripe v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
269 U.S. 503
Stripe v. United States
Argued: Nov. 23, 1925. --- Decided: Jan 11, 1926
Messrs. Ben A Matthews and Harold Harper, both of New York City, for petitioners.
Messrs. W. D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., and Jerome Michael and Henry Gale, both of New York City, for the United States.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Strivings of the Negro People

First appearing as an article in 'The Atlantic Monthly', a longer version (c. 3,000 words c.f. c.2,700) was included as chapter 1 of 'The Souls of Black Folk'.
* "Strivings of the Negro People", in The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 80, Number 478 (August 1897), pp. 204-208
* "Of Our Spiritual Strivings", in The Souls of Black Folk (1903)
# Stroble v. California

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinions

    Douglas
    Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
343 U.S. 181
Stroble v. California
Argued: March 6, 1952. --- Decided: April 7, 1952
See 343 U.S. 952, 72 S.Ct. 1039.
[Syllabus from pages 181-182 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. John D. Gray, A. L. Wirin, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.
Mr. Adolph Alexander, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Stroehmann v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
300 U.S. 435
Stroehmann v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York
Argued: March 11, 1937. --- Decided: March 29, 1937
Messrs. George H. Hafer, Geo. Ross Hull, and Carl B. Shelley, all of Harrisburg, Pa., for petitioner.
Mr. Wm. Marshall Bullitt, of Louisville, Ky., for respondent.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Smith v. Bennett (369 U.S. 425)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
369 U.S. 425
Smith v. Bennett
Appellants, pro se.
Evan Hultman, Atty. Gen. of Iowa, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Smith v. Bennett (369 U.S. 425)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
369 U.S. 425
Smith v. Bennett
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER and Mr. Justice WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Smith v. Bourbon County

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
127 U.S. 105
Smith v. Bourbon County
[Statement of Case from pages 105-109 intentionally omitted]
A. L. Williams and H. E. Long, for appellant.
E. M. Hulett, for appellee.
Mr. Justice MATTHEWS, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# St. Nicholas/Volume 40/Number 10/The Attic Window

* related authors: Frances Evans Ingersoll.
* sister projects: Commons category, Wikidata item.
THE ATTIC WINDOW
BY ISABEL ECCLESTONE MACKAY
# St. Nicholas/Volume 40/Number 10/Monarch and the Viceroy

MONARCH AND THE VICEROY
BY HATTIE VOSE HALL
# St. Nicholas/Volume 40/Number 10/Ready for the Plunge

* related authors: M. L. MacMillan.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
READY FOR THE PLUNGE. — DRAWN BY M. L. MAC MILLAN.
# St. Nicholas/Volume 40/Number 11/A Nightmare

Illustrated by the Author
A NIGHTMARE
| There was once a little girlie, And she had an awful dream; It really was so awful, That she woke up with a scream! She dreamed that all her dollies came And climbed upon the bed— There must have been a score or more In groups upon the spread. There was one-eyed “Arabella,” And headless “Lucy Ann,” And a most distressing cripple Whose name was “Peter Pan.” There was “Maud,” and proud “Belinda”; There was “Evelina Grace’; Each with an arm or leg off, And a scratched and battered face. They held a consultation While she shivered there in bed; | Then up spake Arabella, And this is what she said: “You have been a cruel mother! I say it to your shame! We none of us can love you, And you have been to blame. “You ’ve pulled our arms and legs off! You ‘ve scalped us every one! You ‘ve often scratched our faces, And thought that it was fun. “Belinda ’s full of needles! You ‘ve stuck pins in Emmy Lou! And now we have decided To do the same to you!" It was then the little girlie Awakened with a scream; And oh, but she was thankful To find it was a dream! |
Anna May Cooper.
# St. Nicholas/Volume 40/Number 10/Mother Goose

* related authors: Arthur Rackham.
* sister projects: Commons category, Wikidata item.
Previous instalment: St. Nicholas/Volume 40/Number 8/Mother Goose Next instalment: St. Nicholas/Volume 40/Number 11/Mother Goose
| LITTLE BO-PEEP Little Bo-Peep has lost her sheep, And can't tell where to find them; Leave them alone and they ‘Il come home, And bring their tails behind them. Little Bo-Peep fell fast asleep, And dreamt she heard them bleating; But when she awoke, she found it a joke, For they were still a-fleeting. Then up she took her little crook, Determined for to find them; She found them indeed, but it made her heart bleed, For they ‘d left their tails behind them. | THREE BLIND MICE Three blind mice! See how they run! They all ran after the farmer's wife, Who cut off their tails with the carving- knife,— Did you ever see such fun in your life Did you‍As three blind mice? |
PUSSY-CAT, PUSSY-CAT
“Pussy-cat, Pussy-cat, where have you been?” “I ’ve been up to London to look at the Queen.” “Pussy-cat, Pussy-cat, what did you there?” “I frightened a little mouse under the chair.”
# St. Nicholas/Volume 40/Number 10/The Hawk

* related authors: Charles C. Curran.
* sister projects: Commons category, Wikidata item.
Copyright by The Frederickson Co., 1910.
THE HAWK. FROM THE PAINTING BY CHARLES C. CURRAN.
# St. Nicholas/Volume 40/Number 11

By permission of C. W. Faulkner & Co., Ltd., London, Eng., owners of the copyright.
THE LITTLE DOCTOR.
FROM THE PAINTING BY ARTHUR J. ELSLEY.
ST. NICHOLAS
(The entire contents of this Magazine are covered by the general copyright, and articles must not be reprinted without special permission.)
CONTENTS OF ST. NICHOLAS FOR SEPTEMBER, 1913.
The Century Co. and its editors receive manuscripts and art material, submitted for publication, only on the understanding that they shall not be responsible for loss or injury theretowhile in their possession or in transit. Copies of manuscripts should be retained by the authors.
In the United States and Canada, the price of The St. Nicholas Magazine is $3.00 a year in advance, or 25 cents a single copy, without discount or extra inducement of any kind. Foreign postage is 60 cents extra when subscribers abroad with the magazine mailed directly from New York to them. We request that remittance be by money order, bank check, draft, or registered letter. The Century Co. reserves the right to suspend any subscription taken contrary to its selling terms and to refund the unexpired credit.
Trustees
WILLIAM W. ELLSWORTH, President IRA H. BRAINERD, Vice-President JOSIAH J. HAZEN, Ass’t Treasurer DOUGLAS Z. DOTY, Secretary
# St. Nicholas/Volume 40/Number 11/Hair-cut Man

* related authors: Gertrude Alice Kay.
* sister projects: Commons category, Wikidata item.
THE HAIR-CUT MAN
BY MELVILLE CHATER
| A long way off there came in sight A pole with stripes of red and white. So like a candy-stick it stood You ‘d almost think it tasted good. We walked inside and found him there— The barber-man who cut my hair. And there are bottles on a shelf, And chairs so big you lose yourself, And picture papers hung on poles, And painted cups in cubbyholes, And lots of looking-glasses, too, That show you different kinds of you. | The shiny shears went “peck-a-peck,” As cold as ice, about my neck. When Mother told him, “That ’s enough,” He fizzed my head with smelly stuff And helped me down; and everywhere Ahout me lay my old dead hair. And, oh, when everything was through, I felt so clean and cool and new! And I was bought a red balloon, And smelled so fine all afternoon. If I could only have my way, I'd get my hair cut every day! |
THE HAIR-CUT MAN.
# The Acts and Monuments of John Foxe/Volume 3/The Consolation of Master Jerome to Master Huss

* related portals: Council of Constance, Czech lands.
* related authors: Jan Hus.
Layout 2
The Consolation of Master Jerome to Master Huss.
# The Acts and Monuments of John Foxe/Volume 3/The Epitaph of John Zisca, the valiant Captain of the Bohemians

Layout 2
The Epitaph of John Zisca, the valiant Captain of the Bohemians.
​'ΙΩΑΝΝΕΣ ΣΙΣΚΑΣ ὁ Βωιημὀς, τῶν αὶσχροκερδῶν ἱερέων ἐχθρὸς, ἀλλὰ ἐν θείω ζηλώ.
And thus have you the acts and doings of this worthy Zisca and other Bohemians, which, for the more credit, we have drawn out of Æneas Silvius; only his railing terms excepted, which we have here suppressed.
All this while, the emperor, with the whole power of the Germans, was not so busy on the one side, but Martin the pope was as much occupied on the other side; who, about the same time, directed down a terrible bull, full of all poison, to all bishops and archbishops, against all such as took any part or side with Wickliff, John Huss, Jerome, or with their doctrine and opinions. The copy of which bull, which I found in an old written monument, I wish the reader thoroughly to peruse; wherein he shall see the pope to pour out at once all his poison.
# Some Cities and San Francisco, and Resurgam

Reviewed in the Bulletin of the American Geographical Society, Volume 39.
Some Cities and San Francisco
and
Resurgam
Other Works
WEST AMERICAN SERIES OF HISTORIES.
RESOURCES OF MEXICO.
LITERARY INDUSTRIES.
THE BOOK OF THE FAIR.
THE BOOK OF WEALTH.
THE NEW PACIFIC.
Some Cities and San Francisco and
Resurgam
By Hubert Howe Bancroft
New York The Bancroft Company, Publishers 1907
Copyright, 1907, by H. H. Bancroft
THE TROW PRESS, NEW YORK
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Some Arrows slay but whom they strike—

Some Arrows slay but whom they strike — But this slew all but him — Who so appareled his Escape — Too trackless for a Tomb —
# Stories of Norse Gods and Heroes/The Song Mead

Layout 2
THE SONG MEAD.
Once there lived on earth a poet who sang songs so beautiful that all created things were charmed by them.
Two hill trolls, who hated the poet because he was noble and good, invited him to their home under ground and there killed him.
They caught his blood in two cups and mixed it with honey and made mead. If any man drank the mead it would make him a poet too. But the trolls hid it in a dark place and would give it to no one.
One day the trolls enticed a giant into a boat with them, and drowned him. When his wife came to inquire about him they sent her down to the sea-shore. Then they threw a rock from the cliff and killed her.
Suttung, the son of the giant, came to see what had become of his father and mother. He threatened to kill the trolls.
To save their lives, they gave him the precious song mead. Suttung took it home and put it ​into his cellar. His daughter, Gunlad, guarded it night and day.
Odin wished to drink the mead. So ho made a journey to Jotunheim.
There he saw nine thralls mowing in a field. He offered to whet their scythes. When they found what a keen edge the scythes had, they wanted to buy the whetstone.
Odin threw it up and said that whoever caught it might keep it. In trying to catch the whetstone, the nine thralls killed one another with their scythes.
Then Odin went to the master of the thralls and asked for work. The giant hired Odin because he was so much in need of workmen.
This giant, whose name was Bauge, was Suttung's brother. Odin said he would work all summer for one draught of the song mead.
Bauge told Odin to begin the work and he would see about the mead. When he found that Bolverk, as Odin called himself, could do the work of the nine thralls, he wished to keep him. But Suttung would not give one drop of the mead.
One day when he was away, Bauge and Odin went to his house. They took with them an auger that Odin had brought from Asgard.
Odin bade Bauge bore a hole through the wall ​of the cellar. Bauge pretended to have bored through. But when Odin blew into the hole, the chips flew into his face.
Bauge bored again. This time the chips flew the other way. Then Odin changed himself into a worm and crept through. Before Gunlad knew he was there, he had drunk every drop of the mead.
After drinking the mead, Odin, with all his power could not remain a worm. He changed at once to a beautiful bird, and flew away. When he reached Asgard, he sang such songs as the gods had never heard.
# Stories of Norse Gods and Heroes/Thor's Fight with Hrunger

Layout 2
THOR'S FIGHT WITH HRUNGNER.
One day when Odin was riding abroad on Sleipner, he passed by Jotunheim.
There he met Hrungner, one of the giants. Hrungner said, "Who are you and where did you get that fine horse?"
Odin replied, "I will wager my head that there is not so good a horse in Jotunheim."
Hrungner answered angrily that his horse, Goldmane, could take longer strides.
Then Odin challenged Hrungner to a race. In a short time Goldmane was brought, and the race began. Sleipner was always ahead.
Hrungner thought of nothing but of overtaking him. Before he knew it he had followed Odin into Asgard.
The gods were feasting, and they invited the giant to eat with them. Thor's drinking-horn was brought. Hrungner emptied it at a draught.
​By and by lis began to boast of his strength. "I will tear down Asgard, kill the gods, and carry off Freyja," he cried, crashing Thor's drinking-horn down upon the table.
But the sound made by the drinking-horn called Thor, who was far away.
Soon a muttering as of distant thunder was heard. Flashes of fire streamed through the air, and there was Thor with his hammer in his hand.
"Why is this giant allowed to feast with the gods?" Thor demanded. "He should never have been allowed to enter Asgard."
With that he made ready to strike. But Hrungner cried, "You are a coward if you kill me unarmed. Come to the borders of my own country. There I will meet you with my shield and flint stone."
So a day was appointed, and Hrungner went back to Jotunheim. There he made a huge clay giant, nine miles high and three miles across the shoulders. He put a horse's heart into the giant, because that was the largest heart he could find.
On the appointed day Thor appeared in his chariot, fire flashing from his eyes, mountains tumbling down as he passed, and hurling his hammer before him.
His servant, Thjalfe, the swift runner, went before and told Hrungner that Thor could attack ​him from under the ground as well as from the air. So Hrungner put his shield under his feet.
As Thor approached, so frightened was the clay giant that his horse's heart fluttered within him, and perspiration flowed off him in streams.
Hrungner hurled his flint stone and Thor his hammer at the same moment. They met in the air and the flint stone was broken into two pieces.
One piece fell to the earth and became a mountain. The other piece struck Thor's head and he fell upon the ground.
The hammer struck Hrungner and he fell dead with his foot on Thor's neck. Thor could not remove the giant's foot. All the gods tried, but none of them could lift it.
Then Thor's son, a baby three days old, came and lifted the foot with one hand and said, "Sorry am I that I did not meet the giant, for I think I could have killed him with my fist."