OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Reports/Volume 195

* 195 U.S. 1 (1904) Bradley v. Lightcap
* 195 U.S. 27 (1904) McCray v. United States
* 195 U.S. 65 (1904) Schick v. United States
* 195 U.S. 100 (1904) Kepner v. United States
* 195 U.S. 138 (1904) Dorr v. United States
* 195 U.S. 158 (1904) Mendezona v. United States
* 195 U.S. 159 (1904) Cliff v. United States
* 195 U.S. 165 (1904) Stevenson v. Fain
* 195 U.S. 171 (1904) Schweer v. Brown
* 195 U.S. 172 (1904) Amado v. United States
* 195 U.S. 176 (1904) Crawford v. Burke
* 195 U.S. 194 (1904) Aikens v. State of Wisconsin
* 195 U.S. 207 (1904) Thomas v. Board of Trustees of the Ohio State University
* 195 U.S. 219 (1904) Wright v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company
* 195 U.S. 223 (1904) Dobbins v. City of Los Angeles
* 195 U.S. 242 (1904) Daly v. Elton
* 195 U.S. 243 (1904) Bradford v. Southern Railway Company
* 195 U.S. 252 (1904) New v. Territory of Oklahoma
* 195 U.S. 257 (1904) National Exchange Bank of Tiffin, Ohio v. Wiley
* 195 U.S. 271 (1904) Kaufman v. Tredway
* 195 U.S. 276 (1904) Fayerweather v. Ritch
* 195 U.S. 309 (1904) Patterson v. Hewitt
* 195 U.S. 322 (1904) Metropolitan Railroad Company v. Macfarland
* 195 U.S. 332 (1904) Olsen v. Smith
* 195 U.S. 345 (1904) Birkett v. Columbia Bank
* 195 U.S. 351 (1904) City of Seattle v. Kelleher
* 195 U.S. 361 (1904) United States v. Evans
* 195 U.S. 369 (1904) Citizens' National Bank of Kansas City, Missouri v. Donnell
* 195 U.S. 375 (1904) Baltimore Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Company of Baltimore City v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
* 195 U.S. 383 (1904) Helena Waterworks Company v. City of Helena
* 195 U.S. 395 (1904) Hill v. McCord
* 195 U.S. 408 (1904) Cramer v. Wilson
* 195 U.S. 418 (1904) United States v. Thomas
* 195 U.S. 427 (1904) Lockhart v. Leeds
* 195 U.S. 439 (1904) Northern Pacific Railway Company v. American Trading Company
* 195 U.S. 469 (1904) United States v. Martinez
* 195 U.S. 480 (1904) Humbird v. Avery
* 195 U.S. 510 (1904) City of San Juan v. St. John's Gas Company
* 195 U.S. 524 (1904) United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company
* 195 U.S. 540 (1904) Western Union Telegraph Company v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company
* 195 U.S. 604 (1904) Ex parte Republic of Colombia
* 195 U.S. 606 (1904) Bullis v. O'Beirne
* 195 U.S. 640 (1904) Hunsaker v. Toltec Ranch Company
# United States Reports/Volume 197

* 197 U.S. 1 (1905) Northern Pacific Railway Company v. Ely
* 197 U.S. 9 (1905) Northern Pacific Railway Company v. Hasse
* 197 U.S. 11 (1905) Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
* 197 U.S. 40 (1905) Utermehle v. Norment
* 197 U.S. 60 (1905) Kehrer v. Stewart
* 197 U.S. 70 (1905) San Francisco National Bank v. Dodge
* 197 U.S. 115 (1905) National Cotton Oil Company v. State of Texas
* 197 U.S. 134 (1905) Southern Cotton Oil Company v. State of Texas
* 197 U.S. 135 (1905) United States v. Whitridge
* 197 U.S. 146 (1905) District of Columbia v. Barnes
* 197 U.S. 154 (1905) McClaine v. Rankin
* 197 U.S. 169 (1905) Dallemagne v. Moisan
* 197 U.S. 178 (1905) City of Dawson v. Columbia Avenue Saving Fund Safe Deposit Title Trust Company
* 197 U.S. 183 (1905) Gregg v. Metropolitan Trust Company
* 197 U.S. 197 (1905) Caro v. Davidson
* 197 U.S. 200 (1905) United States v. Stinson
* 197 U.S. 207 (1905) Clyatt v. United States
* 197 U.S. 223 (1905) United States v. Mills
* 197 U.S. 230 (1905) Bartlett v. United States
* 197 U.S. 235 (1905) Greer County v. State of Texas
* 197 U.S. 244 (1905) Harriman v. Northern Securities Company
* 197 U.S. 299 (1905) Western Electrical Supply Company v. Abbeville Electric Light & Power Company
* 197 U.S. 304 (1905) McMichael v. Murphy
* 197 U.S. 313 (1905) Chrisman v. Miller
* 197 U.S. 324 (1905) In re Strauss
* 197 U.S. 334 (1905) Bishop v. United States
* 197 U.S. 343 (1905) McMillen v. Ferrum Mining Company
* 197 U.S. 348 (1905) Carter v. Gear
* 197 U.S. 356 (1905) Keppel v. Tiffin Savings Bank
* 197 U.S. 386 (1905) United States v. Smith
* 197 U.S. 394 (1905) Middletown National Bank v. Toledo, Ann Arbor & Northern Michigan Railway Company
* 197 U.S. 407 (1905) Pennsylvanit Lumbermen's Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Meyer
* 197 U.S. 419 (1905) Lincoln v. United States
* 197 U.S. 430 (1905) Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Barber Asphalt Paving Company
* 197 U.S. 436 (1905) Stillman v. Combel
* 197 U.S. 442 (1905) Hackfeld Company v. United States
* 197 U.S. 453 (1905) New Orleans Gaslight Company v. Drainage Commission of New Orleans
* 197 U.S. 463 (1905) Iron Cliffs Company v. Negaunee Iron Company
* 197 U.S. 475 (1905) United States v. Cadarr
* 197 U.S. 482 (1905) Ex parte Commonwealth of Massachusetts
* 197 U.S. 488 (1905) In re Heff
* 197 U.S. 510 (1905) Whitaker v. McBride
* 197 U.S. 516 (1905) Rassmussen v. United States
* 197 U.S. 536 (1905) United States ex rel. Knapp v. Lake Shore Michigan Southern Railway Company
* 197 U.S. 544 (1905) Muhlker v. New York & Harlem Railroad Company
* 197 U.S. 577 (1905) State of Missouri v. State of Nebraska
# United States Reports/Volume 192

* 192 U.S. 1 (1904) Gonzales v. Williams
* 192 U.S. 16 (1904) Sinclair v. District of Columbia
* 192 U.S. 21 (1904) New York ex rel. Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Knight
* 192 U.S. 29 (1904) Wabash Railroad Company v. Flannigan
* 192 U.S. 38 (1904) Benziger v. United States
* 192 U.S. 55 (1904) Postal Telegraph-Cable Company v. Borough of New Hope
* 192 U.S. 64 (1904) Postal Telegraph-Cable Company v. Borough of Taylor
* 192 U.S. 73 (1904) Citizens' Bank of Louisiana v. Parker
* 192 U.S. 94 (1904) Joplin v. Chachere
* 192 U.S. 108 (1904) Cronin v. Adams
* 192 U.S. 115 (1904) Cronin v. City of Denver
* 192 U.S. 116 (1904) McIntire v. McIntire
* 192 U.S. 125 (1904) German Savings Loan Society v. Dormitzer
* 192 U.S. 129 (1904) James v. Appel
* 192 U.S. 138 (1904) New York County National Bank v. Massey
* 192 U.S. 149 (1904) Royal Insurance Company v. Martin
* 192 U.S. 168 (1904) Ward v. Sherman
* 192 U.S. 179 (1904) Wabash Railroad Company v. Pearce
* 192 U.S. 189 (1904) Crossman v. Lurman
* 192 U.S. 201 (1904) County of Stanislaus v. San Joaquin King's River Canal Irrigation Company
* 192 U.S. 217 (1904) Bedford v. United States
* 192 U.S. 226 (1904) Rogers v. State of Alabama
* 192 U.S. 232 (1904) Shappirio v. Goldberg
* 192 U.S. 243 (1904) Commercial National Bank of Portland v. Weinhare
* 192 U.S. 253 (1904) Chesebrough v. United States
* 192 U.S. 265 (1904) Singer Manufacturing Company v. Cramer
* 192 U.S. 286 (1904) State of South Dakota v. State of North Carolina
* 192 U.S. 355 (1904) United States v. California & Oregon Land Company
* 192 U.S. 363 (1904) Thomas v. United States
* 192 U.S. 371 (1904) Bankers' Mutual Casualty Company v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Sainte Marie Railway Company
* 192 U.S. 386 (1904) Brunswick Terminal Company v. National Bank of Baltimore
* 192 U.S. 397 (1904) Spreckels Sugar Refining Company v. McClain
* 192 U.S. 418 (1904) Cornell v. Coyne
* 192 U.S. 440 (1904) Northern Pacific Railway Company v. Adams
* 192 U.S. 454 (1904) St. Clair v. Interstate Sand Car Transfer Company
* 192 U.S. 470 (1904) Buttfield v. Stranahan
* 192 U.S. 498 (1904) Buttfield v. Bidwell
* 192 U.S. 499 (1904) Buttfield v. United States
* 192 U.S. 500 (1904) American Steel Wire Company v. Speed
* 192 U.S. 524 (1904) United States v. St. Anthony Railroad Company
* 192 U.S. 543 (1904) United States v. Allen
* 192 U.S. 566 (1904) Ex parte Frasch
* 192 U.S. 568 (1904) Central Stock Yards Company v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company
* 192 U.S. 573 (1904) Wedding v. Meyler
* 192 U.S. 585 (1904) Adams v. People of the State of New York
# United States Reports/Volume 199

* 199 U.S. 1 (1905) People of the State of New York ex rel. Metropolitan Street Railway Company v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
* 199 U.S. 48 (1905) People of the State of New York ex rel. Brooklyn City Railroad Company v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
* 199 U.S. 53 (1905) People of the State of New York v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
* 199 U.S. 54 (1905) Gleason v. White
* 199 U.S. 62 (1905) Hyde v. Shine
* 199 U.S. 88 (1905) Dimond v. Shine
* 199 U.S. 89 (1905) O'Callaghan v. O'Brien
* 199 U.S. 119 (1905) The Eliza Lines
* 199 U.S. 142 (1905) McGuire v. Blount
* 199 U.S. 148 (1905) Guthrie v. Harkness
* 199 U.S. 160 (1905) Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Mason City Fort Dodge Railroad Company
* 199 U.S. 171 (1905) Nederland Life Insurance Company v. Meinert
* 199 U.S. 182 (1905) Corkran Oil Development Company v. Arnaudet
* 199 U.S. 194 (1905) Union Refrigerator Transit Company v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
* 199 U.S. 212 (1905) Marvin v. Trout
* 199 U.S. 228 (1905) Rankin v. Barton
* 199 U.S. 233 (1905) Attorney General of the State of Michigan Kies v. Lowrey
* 199 U.S. 241 (1905) Tampa Waterworks Company v. City of Tampa
* 199 U.S. 247 (1905) Chesapeake Beach Railway Company v. Washington Potomac Chesapeake Railroad Company
* 199 U.S. 252 (1905) Sweeney v. Carter Oil Company
* 199 U.S. 260 (1905) Cochran v. County of Montgomery
* 199 U.S. 274 (1905) French v. Taylor
* 199 U.S. 279 (1905) Donovan v. Pennsylvania Company
* 199 U.S. 306 (1905) California Reduction Company v. Sanitary Reduction Works of San Francisco
* 199 U.S. 325 (1905) Gardner v. People of the State of Michigan
* 199 U.S. 335 (1905) Hartman v. Butterfield Lumber Company
* 199 U.S. 342 (1905) Hafemann v. Gross
* 199 U.S. 353 (1905) Royal Insurance Company v. Miller
* 199 U.S. 372 (1905) Jack v. State of Kansas
* 199 U.S. 382 (1905) McCune v. Essig
* 199 U.S. 391 (1905) Estes v. Timmons
* 199 U.S. 397 (1905) Simpson v. United States
* 199 U.S. 401 (1905) Carroll v. Greenwich Insurance Company of New York
* 199 U.S. 414 (1905) United States v. Utah Nevada California Stage Company
* 199 U.S. 425 (1905) Rogers v. Peck
* 199 U.S. 437 (1905) State of South Carolina v. United States
* 199 U.S. 473 (1905) Manigault v. Springs
* 199 U.S. 487 (1905) Petri v. F. E. Creelman Lumber Company
* 199 U.S. 501 (1905) Foppiano v. Speed
* 199 U.S. 521 (1905) Trono v. United States
* 199 U.S. 541 (1905) Clark v. Roller
* 199 U.S. 547 (1905) Riggins v. United States
* 199 U.S. 552 (1905) New York ex rel. Lieberman v. Van De Carr
* 199 U.S. 564 (1905) Sjoli v. Dreschel
* 199 U.S. 570 (1905) Russian-American Packing Company v. United States
* 199 U.S. 579 (1905) Royal Packing Company v. United States
* 199 U.S. 580 (1905) Sofre Alexander v. Seferino Crollott
* 199 U.S. 581 (1905) Eclipse Bicycle Company v. Willard M Farrow
* 199 U.S. 593 (1905) Minnesota Iron Company v. Mark M Kline
* 199 U.S. 617 (1905) William Tryber v. McGregor Creamery Association
# United States Reports/Volume 191

* 191 U.S. 1 (1903) Martin v. Steamship Southwark
* 191 U.S. 17 (1903) Perry v. Haines
* 191 U.S. 55 (1903) Wright v. Morgan
* 191 U.S. 60 (1903) Ross v. Aguirre
* 191 U.S. 64 (1903) Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad Company v. McDade
* 191 U.S. 70 (1903) Hubbert v. Campbellsville Lumber Company
* 191 U.S. 78 (1903) Kinney v. Columbia Savings & Loan Association
* 191 U.S. 84 (1903) United States v. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad Company
* 191 U.S. 93 (1903) Ex parte Joins
* 191 U.S. 102 (1903) Ex parte L. L. Blake
* 191 U.S. 103 (1903) Eckington Soldiers' Home Railway Company v. McDevitt
* 191 U.S. 115 (1903) Holden v. Stratton
* 191 U.S. 119 (1903) Continental National Bank of Memphis v. Buford
* 191 U.S. 126 (1903) Howard v. Fleming
* 191 U.S. 138 (1903) Smith v. State of Indiana
* 191 U.S. 150 (1903) City of Joplin v. Southwest Missouri Light Company
* 191 U.S. 159 (1903) St. Louis Hay & Grain Company v. United States
* 191 U.S. 165 (1903) State of Missouri v. Dockery
* 191 U.S. 171 (1903) Allen v. Pullman's Palace Car Company
* 191 U.S. 184 (1903) Defiance Water Company v. City of Defiance
* 191 U.S. 195 (1903) Warner v. Searle & Hereth Company
* 191 U.S. 207 (1903) Atkin v. State of Kansas
* 191 U.S. 225 (1903) Louisville Trust Company v. Knott
* 191 U.S. 237 (1903) Gertgens v. O'Connor
* 191 U.S. 247 (1903) Mosheuvel v. District of Columbia
* 191 U.S. 267 (1903) McLoughlin v. Raphael Tuck & Sons Company
* 191 U.S. 272 (1903) People's National Bank of Lynchburg v. Marye
* 191 U.S. 288 (1903) Cable v. United States Life Insurance Company
* 191 U.S. 310 (1903) Hibben v. Smith
* 191 U.S. 326 (1903) Choctaw Oklahoma Gulf Railroad Company v. Tennessee
* 191 U.S. 334 (1903) Choctaw Oklahoma Gulf Railroad Company v. Holloway
* 191 U.S. 341 (1903) Sharp v. United States
* 191 U.S. 358 (1903) City of Owensboro v. Owensboro Waterworks Company
* 191 U.S. 373 (1903) Anglo-American Provision Company v. Davis Provision Company
* 191 U.S. 379 (1903) Wisconsin Michigan Railway Company v. Powers
* 191 U.S. 388 (1903) State Board of Assessors of the Parish of Orleans v. Comptoir National D'Escompte De Paris
* 191 U.S. 405 (1903) Arbuckle v. Blackburn
* 191 U.S. 416 (1903) United States Fidelity Guaranty Company v. United States
* 191 U.S. 427 (1903) La Republique Francaise v. Saratoga Vichy Spring Company
* 191 U.S. 441 (1903) Norfolk Western Railway Company v. Sims
* 191 U.S. 451 (1903) Schuyler National Bank v. Gadsden
* 191 U.S. 461 (1903) Baltimore & Potomac Railroad Company v. Landrigan
* 191 U.S. 477 (1903) Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Hughes
* 191 U.S. 492 (1903) Beasley v. Texas Pacific Railway Company
* 191 U.S. 499 (1903) Deposit Bank of Frankfort v. Board of Councilmen of the City of Frankfort
* 191 U.S. 526 (1903) Spencer v. Duplan Silk Company
* 191 U.S. 532 (1903) Toltec Ranch Company v. Cook
* 191 U.S. 542 (1903) Toltec Ranch Company v. Babcock
* 191 U.S. 545 (1903) White v. United States
* 191 U.S. 555 (1903) Northern Securities Company v. United States
* 191 U.S. 5628 (1903) United States v. Pierson
# United States Reports/Volume 198

* 198 U.S. 1 (1905) Benson v. Henkel
* 198 U.S. 17 (1905) Pabst Brewing Company v. Crenshaw
* 198 U.S. 45 (1905) Lochner v. New York
* 198 U.S. 77 (1905) Beavers v. Haubert
* 198 U.S. 91 (1905) Humphrey v. Tatman
* 198 U.S. 95 (1905) Remington v. Central Pacific Railroad Company
* 198 U.S. 100 (1905) City of Covington v. First National Bank of Covington
* 198 U.S. 115 (1905) Bonin v. Gulf Company
* 198 U.S. 118 (1905) Howe Scale Company of 1886 v. Benedict
* 198 U.S. 141 (1905) Steigleder v. McQuesten
* 198 U.S. 144 (1905) Jaster v. Currie
* 198 U.S. 149 (1905) Allen v. Arguimbau
* 198 U.S. 156 (1905) Rodriguez v. United States
* 198 U.S. 166 (1905) Dunbar v. Green
* 198 U.S. 171 (1905) Ex parte Glaser
* 198 U.S. 173 (1905) Schlosser v. Hemphill
* 198 U.S. 177 (1905) Wells Company v. Gastonia Cotton Manufacturing Company
* 198 U.S. 188 (1905) Riverdale Cotton Mills v. Alabama & Georgia Manufacturing Company
* 198 U.S. 202 (1905) Holden v. Stratton
* 198 U.S. 215 (1905) Harris v. Balk
* 198 U.S. 229 (1905) Harley v. United States
* 198 U.S. 236 (1905) Board of Trade of the City of Chicago v. Christie Grain Stock Company
* 198 U.S. 253 (1905) United States v. Ju Toy
* 198 U.S. 280 (1905) First National Bank of Chicago v. Chicago Title Trust Company
* 198 U.S. 292 (1905) Empire State-Idaho Mining Developing Company v. Hanley
* 198 U.S. 299 (1905) Old Dominion Steamship Company v. Commonwealth of Virginia
* 198 U.S. 310 (1905) Thompson v. Darden
* 198 U.S. 317 (1905) Harding v. Harding
* 198 U.S. 341 (1905) Delaware Lackawanna Western Railroad Company v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
* 198 U.S. 361 (1905) Clark v. Nash
* 198 U.S. 371 (1905) United States v. Winans
* 198 U.S. 385 (1905) Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company v. United States
* 198 U.S. 390 (1905) Birrell v. New York Harlem Railroad Company
* 198 U.S. 392 (1905) Savannah, Thunderbolt & Isle of Hope Railway of Savannah, Georgia v. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah
* 198 U.S. 399 (1905) Cimiotti Unhairing Company v. American Fur Refining Company
* 198 U.S. 416 (1905) Leonard v. Vicksburg & Shreveport Pacific Railroad Company
* 198 U.S. 424 (1905) Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Hammond Elevator Company
* 198 U.S. 443 (1905) Lavagnino v. Uhlig
* 198 U.S. 458 (1905) Cunnius v. Reading School District
* 198 U.S. 477 (1905) Kendall v. American Automatic Loom Company
* 198 U.S. 483 (1905) Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. West Coast Naval Stores Company
* 198 U.S. 500 (1905) Ah Sin v. Wittman
* 198 U.S. 508 (1905) Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias v. Meyer
* 198 U.S. 521 (1905) Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. Dashiell
* 198 U.S. 530 (1905) Union Trust Company v. Wilson
* 198 U.S. 539 (1905) Whitney v. Wenman
* 198 U.S. 554 (1905) Reed v. People's National Bank of Lebanon, Pennsylvania
* 198 U.S. 561 (1905) Great Western Mining Manufacturing Company v. Harris
# United States v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis (215 U.S. 595)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
215 U.S. 595
United States v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis
Certificate dismissed on the authority of Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 215 U.S. 216, 54 L. Ed. , 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 86.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis (236 U.S. 194)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
236 U.S. 194
United States v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis
Argued: October 20, 1914. --- Decided: February 23, 1915
Mr. Edward C. Crow, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, for the United States.
Messrs. H. S. Priest and T. M. Pierce for the Terminal Railroad Association et al.
Messrs. George M. Block and John F. Lee for the Evens & Howard Fire Brick Company.
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Texas & Pacific Motor Transport Company Regular Common Carrier Conference of American Trucking Ass'ns Inc (340 U.S. 450)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
340 U.S. 450
United States v. Texas & Pacific Motor Transport Company Regular Common Carrier Conference of American Trucking Ass'ns Inc
Argued: Nov. 7-8, 1950. --- Decided: Feb 26, 1951
See 341 U.S. 906, 71 S.Ct. 609.
Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton, Washington, D.C., for the United States and Interstate Commerce Commission.
Mr. Frank C. Brooks, Dallas, Tex., for Regular Common Carrier Conference of American Trucking Associations, Inc.
Mr. J. T. Suggs, Dallas, Tex., for the Texas & Pacific Motor Transport co.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Texas

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Texas."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Texas (143 U.S. 621), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
* United States v. Texas (162 U.S. 1), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
* United States v. Texas (314 U.S. 480), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
* United States v. Texas (340 U.S. 900), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
* United States v. Texas (507 U.S. 529), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
* United States v. Texas (2023)
   * listing incomplete
# United States v. Texas (143 U.S. 621)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
143 U.S. 621
United States v. Texas
[Statement of Case from pages 621-624 intentionally omitted]
A. H. Garland, H. J. May, and C. A. Culberson, for the State of Texas.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 624-630 intentionally omitted]
Edgar Allen, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Teschmaker

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
63 U.S. 392
United States v. Teschmaker

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Unconventional Warfare Pocket Guide/Unconventional Warfare Overview

​Unconventional Warfare Overview The focus in UW is on the indigenous resistance elements, not U.S. force structures and procedures. UW falls within the construct of Irregular Warfare (IW) and is one of U.S. Special Operations Command's (USSOCOM) Core Activities. USSOCOM Directives 10-1cc (U) and 52589 (S//NF) establishes USASOC as the Lead Component for UW. This directive also describes the SOF service component capabilities and tasks for UW.
Figure 1. USSOCOM Activities
Special Operations Core Activities
* Unconventional Warfare (UW)
* Foreign Internal Defense (FID)
* Direct Action (DA)
* Civil Affairs Operations (CAO)
* Special Reconnaissance (SR)
* Security Force Assistance (SFA)
* Counterterrorism (CT)
* Hostage Rescue and Recovery (HRR)
* Counterinsurgency (COIN)
* Foreign Humanitarian Assistance (FHA)
* Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction (CWMD)
* Military Information Support Operations (MISO)
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Unconventional Warfare Pocket Guide/UW Phase VI: Employment

​UW Phase VI: Employment
During employment, the resistance force initiates an expanded scope of offensive operations to achieve the desired effects. The desired effects can range from causing the enemy to commit limited resources away from a pending invasion area, support to a pending invasion area (as in general war), or in the case of a separate insurgency (limited war), the achievement of specific strategic politico-military objectives. The main activities in this phase consist of interdiction and MISO. The specific tactics (raids and ambushes) and activities (intelligence gathering, force protection) that occur during employment are not exclusive to UW.
Activities
* Maintain Alignment of Resistance Campaign Activities with Resistance Narratives and Legitimacy
* Synchronize Resistance Operations and Activities Across Boundaries
* Expand Resistance Controlled Territory
* Employ MISO Messaging to Delegitimize Adversary and Legitimize Resistance
* Provide Civil-Military Support to Displaced Persons, Refugees & Evacuees (DPRE), and Expand and Prepare Resistance Capacity for Governance
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse