OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Walker v. Johnston

United States Supreme Court
312 U.S. 275
Walker v. Johnston
Argued: Jan. 15, 1941. --- Decided: Feb 10, 1941
Mr. Charles E. Wyzanski, Jr., of Boston, Mass., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 275-277 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Herbert Wechsler, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 275-277 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/20th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 2

Chap. II.—An Act restricting the location of certain land claims in the territory of Arkansas, and for other purposes.
Persons entitled to a donation of land in Arkansas, by virtue of an act entitled, &c., not allowed to enter the improvement of actual settlers, &c. Act of May 24, 1828, ch. 108.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That no person entitled to a donation of land by the eighth section of an act, entitled “An act to aid the state of Ohio in extending the Miami canal from Dayton to Lake Erie, and to grant a quantity of land to said state to aid in the construction of the canals authorized by law, and for making donations of land to certain persons in the Arkansas territory,” shall be permitted to enter the improvement of any actual settler in the territory of Arkansas, before the same shall have been offered for sale, unless it be with the consent of such actual settler; and all entries which may be so made shall be considered null and void.
Residents south of Arkansas river, &c. west of territorial line, not entitled to donation given by said act, unless, &c.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That no person residing south of the Arkansas river, and west of the present territorial line, shall be entitled to the donation of land given by the eighth section aforesaid, unless said persons shall move east of said line; and, in that case, they shall be entitled to the donations specified in the said eighth section of said act, under the restrictions aforesaid.
Approved, January 6, 1829.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/20th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 12

Chap. XII.—An Act in addition to the act, entitled “An act to amend the judicial system of the United States.”
Act of April 29, 1802, ch. 31. Authority to adjourn the Supreme Court from day to day, in case of non-attendance of quorum, extended. Court not to be adjourned, &c.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That if, at any session of the Supreme Court, four justices thereof shall not attend on the day appointed for holding said session, such justice or justices as may attend shall have authority to adjourn said court from day to day, for twenty days after the time appointed for the commencement of said session, unless four justices shall sooner attend; and the business of said court shall not, in such case, be continued over to the next stated session thereof, until the expiration of said twenty days, instead of the ten days now limited by law.
After quorum once formed and subsequent non-attendance of, quorum, authority given to adjourn, &c.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That if it shall so happen, during any term of the said Supreme Court, after four of the judges shall have assembled, that, on any day, less than the number of four shall assemble, the judge or judges so assembling shall have authority to adjourn said court from day to day until a quorum shall attend, and, when expedient and proper, may adjourn the same without day.
Approved, January 21, 1829.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/20th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 19

Chap. XIX.—An Act to alter the time for holding the sixth circuit court of the United States for the district of South Carolina.
Hereafter to be holden 4th Monday in November.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the sixth circuit court of the United States, for the district of South Carolina, which is required by law to be holden on the second Monday in December, annually, shall hereafter be holden on the fourth Monday in November, annually; and that all process which shall have been issued, and all recognisances returnable, and all suits and other proceedings, which have been continued to the said court, on the day heretofore provided by law for the meeting of the same, shall be returned and held continued to the said court, at the time herein provided for the meeting thereof.
Approved, February 24, 1829.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/20th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 14

Chap. XIV.—An Act to allow further time to complete the issuing and locating of military land warrants.
Acts extending time for issuing and locating land warrants, continued. 1824, ch. 177. 1819, ch. 41.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the act entitled “An act to allow further time to complete the issuing and locating of military land warrants,” approved the twenty-sixth day of May, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-four, and, also, the operations of the act, approved the twenty-fourth day of May, one thousand eight hundred and nineteen, which by the said act of one thousand eight hundred and ​twenty-four is revived, be, and the said acts are hereby, extended and continued in force for the term of five years from and after the twenty-sixth day of May next.
Approved, February 5, 1829.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/20th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 15

Chap. XV.—An Act authorizing the laying off a town on Bean river, in the state of Illinois, and for other purposes.
Town to be laid off at Galena, in Illinois.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That a tract of land in the state of Illinois, at and including “Galena,” on Bean river, shall, under the direction of the surveyor of the public lands for the states of Illinois and Missouri, and the territory of Arkansas, be laid off into town lots, streets, and avenues, and into out-lots, having regard to the lots and streets already surveyed, in such manner, and of such dimensions, as he may think proper:Size of town and of lots. Lots to be offered to highest bidder. Provided, The tract so to be laid off shall not exceed the quantity contained in one entire section, nor the town lots one quarter of an acre each, nor shall the out-lots exceed the quantity of two acres each. When the survey of the lots shall be completed, a plat thereof shall be returned to the Secretary of the Treasury, and within twelve months thereafter the lots shall be offered to the highest bidder at public sale, under the direction of the President of the United States, and at such other times as he shall think proper:Minimum price. Reservation along margin of river. Provided, That no town lot shall be sold for a sum less than five dollars; and provided further, That a quantity of ground of proper width on the said river, and running therewith the whole length of the said town, shall be reserved from sale for public use, and remain forever a common highway.
Lots to be classed.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That it shall be the duty of the said surveyor to class the lots already surveyed, in the said town of Galena, into three classes, according to the relative value thereof, on account of situation and eligibility for business, without regard, however, to the improvements made thereon;Right of pre-emption. and previous to the sale of the said lots as aforesaid, each and every person, or his, her, or their legal representative or representatives, who shall heretofore have obtained from the agent of the United States a permit to occupy any lot or lots in the said town of Galena, or who shall have actually occupied and improved any lot or lots in the said town, or within the tract of land hereby authorized to be laid off into lots, shall be permitted to purchase such lot or lots, by paying therefor, in cash, if the same fall within the first class, as aforesaid, at the rate of twenty-five dollars per acre; if within the second class, at the rate of fifteen dollars per acre; and if within the third class, at the rate of ten dollars per acre: Provided, That no one of the persons aforesaid shall be permitted to purchase by authority of this section more than one half acre of ground; unless a larger quantity shall be necessary to embrace permanent improvements already made.
Approved, February 5, 1829.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/20th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 18

Chap. XVIII.—An Act to provide for the purchase and distribution of certain copies of the Digest of the Laws of the United States, by Thomas F. Gordon.
500 copies to be purchased. Price.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of the Department of State be, and he is hereby, authorized to purchase for the United States, five hundred copies of the Digest of the Laws of the United States, compiled by Thomas F. Gordon, at the price of six ​dollars per copy, bound in calf-skin; and cause the same to be distributed as follows: one copy thereof to the President of the United States, one copy to the Vice President of the United States, one copy to each of the heads of departments, to the attorney general of the United States, to each of the senators and representatives, and to each delegate of the territories to the twentieth Congress; fifteen copies to the secretary of the Senate, for the use of the Senate; thirty copies to the clerk of the House of Representatives, for the use of that house; one copy to each branch of the legislature of each state and territory: and one copy to each of the executives of the several states and territories; and one copy to each incorporated college in the United States; and one copy to each justice of the Supreme Court; one copy to each district judge, and one copy to each judge of the courts of the territories of the United States, and of the District of Columbia; and cause the residue to be deposited in the library of Congress.
Appropriation of 3000 dollars.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That there shall be appropriated, and paid out of any moneys in the treasury unappropriated, the sum of three thousand dollars, for the completion of the said purchase.
Approved, February 24, 1829.
# United States v. Urbuteit (335 U.S. 355)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
335 U.S. 355
United States v. Urbuteit
Argued: Oct. 13, 14, 1948. ---
Messrs. Philip B. Perlman, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., Alexander M. Campbell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Philip Elman, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and William W. Goodrich and Bernard D. Levinson, Attys., Federal Security Agency, both of Washington D.C., for the United States.
Mr. H. O. Pemberton, of Tallahassee, Fla., for respondent.
Opinion of the Court by Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, announced by Mr. Justice REED.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Urbuteit (336 U.S. 804)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
336 U.S. 804
United States v. Urbuteit
On Petition for Certiorari Distributed
April 15, 1949.
Decided May 2, 1949.
Mr. Philip B. Perlman, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. H. O. Pemberton, of Tallahassee, Fla., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Urbuteit (336 U.S. 804)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
336 U.S. 804
United States v. Urbuteit
The question presented by this petition is whether the Court of Appeals followed our mandate on remand of the cause in 335 U.S. 355, 69 S.Ct. 112.
The case when it was here earlier this Term appeared in the following posture:
A condemnation proceeding was instituted by the United States under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 52 Stat. 1044, 21 U.S.C. § 334, 21 U.S.C.A. § 334. Sixteen machines with alleged diagnostic and curative capabilities had been shipped in interstate commerce. Leaflets describing the uses of the machine had been shipped at a separate time. The Court of Appeals, 164 F.2d 245, had held that the separate shipments of the machines a d leaflets precluded a conclusion that the leaflets had accompanied the device in interstate commerce, and therefore the transaction was outside the reach of the Act. We reversed the Court of Appeals and held that the separate shipment of the machines and leaflets constituted a single interrelated activity.
On remand the Court of Appeals, 172 F.2d 386, concluded that because there were several shipments of machines and a single shipment of advertising matter, it was not clear which shipments might be considered a single interrelated activity. Therefore, it remanded the case to the District Court for a determination of this fact.
When the case was here before, we decided that the fact of separate shipments of machines and leaflets was immaterial. The controlling factors were whether the leaflets were designed for use with the machine and whether they were so used. Since the function of the leaflets and the purpose of their shipment were established, nothing more was needed to show that the movements of the machines and leaflets constituted a single interrelated activity. Moreover, the case is not complicated by shipments of machines and leaflets to different persons. One Kelsch was the recipient of both.
On remand the Court of Appeals adhered to its former ruling that the District Court erroneously excluded evidence as to the therapeutic or curative value of the machines. When the case was here before we did not disturb that ruling. But we did leave to the Court of Appeals for consideration a further question-whether the evidence as respects the falsity of the diagnostic capabilities of the machine was adequate to sustain the condemnation even though error in exclusion of the other evidence were conceded. The United States is entitled to a hearing on that question.
The petition for certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed.
Reversed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Unzeuta

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
281 U.S. 138
United States v. Unzeuta
Argued: and Submitted March 12, 1930. --- Decided: April 14, 1930
The Attorney General and Mr. Richardson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from page 139 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Allen G. Fisher, of Chadron, Neb., for appellee.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Updike

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
281 U.S. 489
United States v. Updike
Argued: April 15, 1930. --- Decided: May 19, 1930
The Attorney General and Mr. G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.
Messrs. Francis A. Brogan and Alfred G. Ellick, both of Omaha, Neb., for respondents.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Utah

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Utah."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Utah (279 U.S. 816)
* United States v. Utah (283 U.S. 64)
* United States v. Utah (283 U.S. 801)
See also Utah v. United States.
# United States v. Urbuteit

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Urbuteit."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Urbuteit (335 U.S. 355)
* United States v. Urbuteit (336 U.S. 804)
# Weird Tales/Volume 43/Issue 2/My Timid Soul

My Timid Soul
By PAGE COOPER
DEMONS sit on the rim of day Honing their claws for my timid soul, Wetting their lips in their lust to flay, Their black lips flecked with a bitter whey, As they gurgle a grim and raucous lay.
Quaking, my pallid soul looks out. Safe in my heart—the puny mole! Rattling his wings he squeaks a shout. On frightened pinions he dares to flout The slavering demons roundabout.
# Weird Tales/Volume 44/Issue 7/The Mermaid

The Mermaid
By Leah Bodine Drake
Flashing through facets of her glassy world The many-chambered sea, cold mermaid rises, For a lean shadow now obliquely moves Across her rippled roof.
Up, up, up from her hollowed water-land, Up convoluted stairways of her restless house The mermaid mounts, shaking her dangerous hair, And see! she spreads before the vessel's bow Her gold-green locks and scarlet seaweed crown, Her pearly-pale half-body of a girl Cupped in its husk of opalescent scale.
Who flushes red, and leaps, and in her arms Sinks with a bubbled cry of fear and joy, But he the youngest of the gaping crew? O call in vain to your lost brother, fling the net. Tough powerless fishers straining desperate-eyed Against die dripping side! Then bid the women on the hungry shore Raise the wild keen and wring their empty hands?
Far out the mermaid, tired of her play, Lets her chill toy drift weathercock, supine, In hammocks of the swinging tides, while she Flicks a bright fin and darts to comb her curls Among rough water-rocks off Brittany.
Illustration by Boris Dolgov
# Webster's Revision Bible/Philemon

Philemon.
Before CHRIST, A.D. 64.
CHAP. 1.
Paul, a prisoner of Jesus Christ, and Timothy our brother, to Philemon our dearly beloved, and fellowlabourer, $^2$ And to our beloved Apphia, and Archippus our fellowsoldier, and to the church in thy house: $^3$ Grace to you, and peace, from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. $^4$ I thank my God, making mention of thee always in my prayers, $^5$ Hearing of thy love and faith, which thou hast toward the Lord Jesus, and toward all saints; $^6$ That the fellowship of thy faith may become effectual by the acknowledging of every good thing which is in you in Christ Jesus. $^7$ For we have great joy and consolation in thy love, because the hearts of the saints are refreshed by thee, brother.
$^8$ Therefore, though I might be very bold in Christ to command thee what is befitting, $^9$ Yet for love’s sake I rather beseech thee, being such an one as Paul the aged, and now also a prisoner of Jesus Christ. $^{10}$ I beseech thee for my son Onesimus, whom I have begotten in my bonds: $^{11}$ Who in time past was to thee unprofitable, but now profitable to thee and to me: $^{12}$ Whom I have sent again: thou therefore receive him, that is, my own heart: $^{13}$ Whom I would have retained with me, that in thy stead he might have ministered to me in the bonds of the gospel: $^{14}$ But without thy mind I would do nothing; that thy benefit should not be as it were of necessity, but willingly. $^{15}$ For perhaps he therefore departed for a season, that thou shouldest receive him for ever; $^{16}$ Not now as a servant, but above a servant, a brother beloved, especially to me, but how much more to thee, both in the flesh, and in the Lord? $^{17}$ If thou count me therefore a partner, receive him as myself. $^{18}$ If he hath wronged thee, or oweth thee any thing, put that on my account; $^{19}$ I Paul have written it with my own hand, I will repay it : although I do not say to thee that thou owest to me even thy own self besides. $^{20}$ Yea, brother, let me have joy of thee in the Lord: refresh my heart in the Lord. $^{21}$ Having confidence in thy obedience I wrote to thee, knowing that thou wilt also do more than I say. $^{22}$ But at the same time prepare for me also a lodging: for I trust that through your prayers I shall be given to you. $^{23}$ There greet thee Epaphras, my fellowprisoner in Christ Jesus; $^{24}$ Mark, Aristarchus, Demas, Luke, my fellowlabourers. $^{25}$ The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit. Amen.
# Who's Who in the Far East/MORIMURA, Ichizaemon

Layout 2
​ MORIMURA, Ichizaemon ( TOKYO ) Merchant and Banker; b. Oct., 1839,. at Tokyo. Exporter and importer; controls the Morimura Bank, and is Director of Bank of Japan. Address: Tokyo, Japan.
# Who's Who in the Far East/MORGAN, Richard Henry

Layout 2
​ MORGAN, Richard Henry (PENANG), Surveyor. Sub.-Assistant Surveyor, Ceylon, March 1, 1875; assistant Surveyor, Jan. 1, 1877, to Dec. 31, 1880; assistant Surveyor, Singapore, Jan. 1, 1881; transferred to Penang, Jan. 1, 1885; Senior Surveyor, Penang, July 30, 1902. Address: Penang, Straits Settlements.
# Who's Who in the Far East/MORI, Dr. Rintaro

Layout 2
​ MORI, Dr. Rintaro (TOKYO), Surgeon-General; b. in 1860. Educ.: Germany. Was. Surgeon -General of the Tokyo Division in Manchuria. Publications: Translations of several German classics. Address: Tokyo, Japan.
# Who's Who in the Far East/MOREL, Jules

Layout 2
​ MOREL, Jules (CAMBODIA), Chief Resident in Cambodia. Decorations: Officier de la L e g i o u d'Honneur; Officer de 1'Instruction publique. A d d re ss: Cambodia, Indo-China.
# Who's Who in the Far East/MORGAN, Dr. Lorenzo Seymour

Layout 2
​ MORGAN, Dr. Lorenzo Seymour (TSINGKIANGPU), b. Aug. 15, 1875. Educ.: Knox College, Galesburg, Illinois, U.S.A.; Johns Hopkins Medical School Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A. Address: Southern Presbyterian Mission, Tsingkiangpu, via Chinkiang, China.
# Who's Who in the Far East/MORI, Benjiro

Layout 2
​ MORI, Benjiro (HONGKONG), Assistant Manager Hongkoug branch, Nippon Yusen Kaisha; b. 1868. Educ. Tokyo, Japan. Was for some time on staff of "Japan Times," the only daily paper printed in English which is published at Tokyo; afterwards joined N.Y.K., Tokyo branch; has occupied present position seven years. Address: Prince's Buildings,. Chater Road, Hongkong.
# Who's Who in the Far East/MORIN. Pierre Francois Auguste

Layout 2
​ MORIN, Pierre Francois Auguste (LAOS), Resident; Administrator, 2nd class; b. Nov. 28, 1867. Joined Indo-China Civil Service, Sept. 2, 1887; Administrator, 4th class, June 1, 1895; Administrator, 3rd class, June 13, 1896; Administrator, 2ni class, Jan. 1, 1903. Address: Laos, Indo-China.