OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Gardemal v. Westin Hotel Co.

* related portals: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
* 186 F.3d 588
* LISA CERZA GARDEMAL, Administrator of the Estate of John W. Gardemal, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,
* v.
* WESTIN HOTEL COMPANY, doing business as Westin Regina Resort; WESTIN MEXICO SA DE CV, Defendants-Appellees.
* No. 98-50119
* United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
* August 17, 1999, Decided
* As Revised September 14, 1999
* Rehearing Denied September 29, 1999
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas.
AFFIRMED.
For LISA CERZA GARDEMAL, Plaintiff - Appellant: Ronald F Ederer, Reed, Ederer & Moore, San Antonio, TX.
For LISA CERZA GARDEMAL, Plaintiff - Appellant: Kenneth L King, King Law Firm, Dallas, TX.
For WESTIN HOTEL COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee: Jeffrey S Hawkins, Ball & Weed, San Antonio, TX.
For WESTIN HOTEL COMPANY, WESTIN MEXICO SA DE CV, Defendants - Appellees: John Barney Beckworth, Danielle Clarke, Beckworth & Carrigan, Houston, TX.
Before EMILIO GARZA, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Garber v. Kansas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 51
Garber v. Kansas
Marvin M. Karpatkin, E. Dexter Galloway and Melvin L. Wulf, for appellant.
Robert C. Londerholm, Atty. Gen. of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Leo Pfeffer, for National Committee for Amish Religious Freedom, amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Garber v. Kansas/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 51
Garber v. Kansas
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, and Mr. Justice FORTAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Garber v. Crews

United States Supreme Court
324 U.S. 200
Garber v. Crews
Argued: Feb. 6, 7, 1945. --- Decided: Feb 26, 1945
Mr. P. C. Simons, of Enid, Okl., for petitioner.
Mr. Christy Russell, of Mattoon, Ill., for respondents.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Garden (Whittier)

* “Garden,” in The Complete Poetical Works of John Greenleaf Whittier (1895)
* “Blessing for the Tree Planter,” in Oklahoma Arbor and Bird Day, Friday, March Twelfth, 1909
# Garden

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Garden."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, taxonomy, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Garden, by John Greenleaf Whittier
* A Garden, a poem by H. P. Lovecraft
* A Garden, by Andrew Marvell
* The Garden, a poem by Ralph Waldo Emerson
* The Garden, a poem by Alice Meynell
* The Garden, a poem by John Cowper Powys
* The Garden, a poem by Lydia Huntley Sigourney
* The Garden, a poem by Sara Teasdale
* The Garden, a poem by Edwin Arlington Robinson

## See also

* In a Garden
* In the Garden
# From Passion to Peace

Layout 2
From Passion to Peace
FROM PASSION TO PEACE or The Pathway of the Pure by JAMES ALLEN
AUTHOR OF “As a Man Thinketh,” “The Mastery of Destiny,” “From Poverty to Power,” “Byways of Blessedness,” &c.
New York THOMAS Y. CROWELL & CO.
COPYRIGHT, 1910, BY JAMES ALLEN
COMPOSITION AND ELECTROTYPE PLATES BY D. B. UPDIKE, THE MERRYMOUNT PRESS, BOSTON
Foreword
The first three parts of this book, Passion, Aspiration, and Temptation, represent the common human life, with its passion, pathos, and tragedy; The last three parts, Transcendence, Beatitude, and Peace, represents the Divine Life—calm, wise and beautiful—of the sage and Savior. The middle part, Transmutation, is the transitional stage between the two; it is the alchemic process linking the divine with the human life. Discipline, denial, and renunciation do not constitute the Divine State; they are only the means by which it is attained. The Divine Life is established in that Perfect Knowledge which bestows Perfect Peace.
James Allen
    Bryngoleu
       Ilfracombe, Devon.
          England.
Contents
* PAGE
* PASSION1
* ASPIRATION8
* TEMPTATION16
* TRANSMUTATION24
* TRANSCENDENCE33
* BEATITUDE44
* PEACE50
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# From Omar Khayyam

* From Omar Chiam in May-day and other pieces (1867)
* From Omar Khayyam in Poems (Household Edition, 1904)
# Fourth Letter to his Brothers

FORT GEORGE, Sept. 13, 1810.
My good and dear friends,—I have been of late so much upon the move, that I had no thought of writing to you, and no letters of yours put me in mind that I should do so. Here I am stationed for some time, unless I succeed in the application I mean to make shortly for permission to visit England. At present Vincent, Glegg, and Williams, 49th, enliven this lonesome place. They are here as members of a general court martial, and are soon to depart, when I shall be left to my own reflections. Should I be so lucky as to obtain leave, I shall not commence my journey to New York until after Christmas. Baron de Rottenburg, a senior brigadier, has arrived at Quebec, where he remains. His presence unquestionably diminishes my prospects in this country, and I should stand evidently in my own light if I did not court fortune elsewhere.
I have been as far as Detroit, a delightful country, far exceeding any thing I had seen on this continent.
I have not had a letter from Europe since May, and wish you to write to me by way of New York. I avail myself of an unexpected passenger to scribble this in the presence of many of the court, who tell me it is time to resume our labours; therefore, my beloved brothers, adieu. I shall write again in a few days, viâ New York.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fourth Channel (Wyn Roberts letter)

Letter from the Permanent Under-secretary of State Welsh Office, Wyn Roberts to the Secretary of State for Wales Nicholas Edwards regarding the Fourth Channel.
From Wyn Roberts M.P. P.U.S.S. Welsh Office
To Rt Hon Nicholas Edwards M.P. Sec. of State for Wales
HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON S.W.1.
Dear Nick
Aug 9 '80
I travelled home yesterday with Lord Goronwy Roberts who told me that the Shadow Cabinet last week decided to put forward an amendment to the Broadcasting Bill in the Lords to concentrate all Welsh language programmes on the Fourth Channel. The amendment may be moved by Cledwyn because Lord Elwyn Jones who normally speaks on Welsh matters for the Opposition, does not feel that he is familiar enough with the subject. Goronwy was uncertain as to whether they would press the amdmt. to a division. I believe the date of the Lords' discussion is Oct 8 - two days after Gwynfor Evans begins his fast. If the Lords were to carry the amdmt. it would clearly weaken our position very considerably. The argument likely to be deployed is that the cost of concentrating Welsh programmes on the Fourth Channel is less than we believe and amounts to the loss of advertising revenue associated with placing an additional 10 hours of B.B.C. Welsh programmes on the Fourth Channel.
I am copying this to John Belstead.
Yours ever Wyn.
This work is licensed under the United Kingdom Open Government Licence v3.0.
    You are free to:
   * copy, publish, distribute and transmit the Information;
   * adapt the Information;
   * exploit the Information commercially and non-commercially for example, by combining it with other Information, or by including it in your own product or application.
    You must, where you do any of the above:
   * acknowledge the source of the Information in your product or application by including or linking to any attribution statement specified by the Information Provider(s) and, where possible, provide a link to this licence.
   * If the Information Provider does not provide a specific attribution statement, you must use the following:
    Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
    This license does NOT cover:
   * personal data in the Information;
   * Information that has not been accessed by way of publication or disclosure under information access legislation (including the Freedom of Information Acts for the UK and Scotland) by or with the consent of the Information Provider;
   * departmental or public sector organisation logos, crests and the Royal Arms except where they form an integral part of a document or dataset;
   * military insignia;
   * third party rights the Information Provider is not authorised to license;
   * other intellectual property rights, including patents, trade marks, and design rights; and
   * identity documents such as the British Passport.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fourth Book of Occult Philosophy

* related works: Three Books of Occult Philosophy.
* sister projects: Commons category, Wikidata item.
This is actually a collection of six works, first published in Latin in Germany in the middle of the 16th Century, about 20 years after Agrippa's death, the first two works were ascribed to Agrippa; however, they, or at least the Fourth Book, were denounced by Johann Weyer, a student of Agrippa, as being not in his Master's style. The final work is unattributed. This translation of the six short books dates to 1655.
Henry Cornelius Agrippa His Fourth Book of Occult Philosophy. Or Of Geomancy. Magical Elements of Peter de Abano. Astronomical Geomancy. The Nature of Spirits. Arbatel of Magick.
Translated into English by Robert Turner, Φιλομαϑής.
London, Printed by J.C. for John Harrison, at the Lamb at the East-end of Pauls. 1655.
* Of Geomancy - Attributed to Henry Cornelius Agrippa
* Of Occult Philosophy, Of Magical Ceremonies: The Fourth Book - Attributed to Henry Cornelius Agrippa
* Heptameron: or, Magical Elements attributed to Peter de Abano (see also, Wikipedia entry on Peter de Abano)
* Isagoge: An Introductory Discourse on the nature of such Spirits as are exercised in the sublunary Bounds; their Original, Names, Offices, Illusions, Powers, Prophecies, Miracles; and how they may be expelled and driven away - attributed to Georg Pictorius Villinganus
* Of Astronomical Geomancy - attributed to Gerard Cremonensis (see also, Wikipedia entry Gerard Cremonensis)
* Arbatel of Magick author unknown (see also, Wikipedia article on the Arbatel of Magick)
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Fourteen sonnets and poems/What is Truth?

What is Truth?
<poem>ASKED jesting Pilate, "What is Truth?"
Leaving unanswered that which was
Yet "What is Truth?" was answered more
Since sealed it was to be for aye,
That lofty life, and mighty heart,
Declared what's truth in life and deed,
Yet "What is Truth?" if't must be told,—
The test of thought,—the war of words,—
# Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar/11. Other Signs which affect the Reading

Layout 2
Very closely connected with the vowel points are the reading-signs, which were probably introduced at the same time. Besides the diacritical point over שׂ and שׁ, a point is placed within a consonant ​to show that it has a stronger sound. On the other hand a horizontal stroke (Rāphè) over a consonant is a sign that it has not the stronger sound. According to the different purposes for which it is used the point is either
* Dageš forte, a sign of strengthening (§ 12); or
* Dageš lene, a sign of the harder pronunciation of certain consonants (§ 13); or
* Mappîq, a sign to bring out the full consonantal value of letters which otherwise serve as vowel letters (§ 7 b), especially in the case of ה at the end of the word (§ 14 a).
The Rāphè, which excludes the insertion of any of these points, has almost entirely gone out of use in our printed texts (§ 14 e).
# Free Software, Older Computers Help Group Narrow Digital Divide

Published in the Portland Tribune on May 4, 2001.
While the Open Source Development Lab works on improving free open-source software for the benefit of Fortune 500 companies, open-source software such as Linux remains a mystery to millions of home computer users. The obstacle is not security or performance, but access.
How do you go about getting Linux or installing it? Who can help you learn to use it or help you fix it if it breaks? Will you be able to read documents created on your sister’s iMac or your boss’ Windows machine?
Free Geek, a Portland nonprofit organization, provides just the service needed — in the words of John Gilmore, an industry insider and open-source expert — to “make free software affordable.”
An older computer running Windows 95 might be sluggish and expensive to maintain. But replace Windows with the free Linux system, and it can feel like new again. Free Geek breathes new life into computer equipment that probably would otherwise end up in a landfill. In early April, the group took in its 10,000th piece of equipment since it was established a little over a year ago.
Little wonder that the group’s biggest supporter is the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, which has provided Free Geek with a $41,070 grant.
In Free Geek’s unique program, not only are old computers revived, but people who otherwise couldn’t afford them receive the computers free and are trained to use them by computer experts who donate their time.
This work is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows free use, distribution, and creation of derivatives, so long as the license is unchanged and clearly noted, and the original author is attributed.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
Originally published in the Portland Tribune. Free license declared here.
# Free Vanunu

See Mordechai Vanunu (Wikipedia)
NUCLEAR HOSTAGE
Kidnapped! Silenced! Incarcerated!
11 years in solitary confinement by Israel!
Free Vanunu
This work is licensed under the terms of the FAL Free Art license .
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Free Speech Flag

May 1, 2007. John Marcotte. Free Speech Flag. Badmouth. Badmouth, (Archived link). Alternate link: Badmouth.
Free Speech Flag
John Marcotte
May 1, 2007
Free Speech Flag
Free Speech Flag
May 1, 2007
Our government has become increasingly willing to sacrifice the rights of its citizens at the altar of corporate greed. As ridiculous as it sounds, even numbers have become “intellectual property” that corporations can claim ownership of. We here at Badmouth think that idea stinks. We want to start a movement, a movement to reclaim personal liberties and decorporatize the laws of our nation.
To that end we have made a flag, a symbol to show support for personal freedoms. Spread it as far and wide as you can. We give this flag away freely, and also give away the rights for people to make similar, derivative works. the colors of the flag are (in hex code format):
#09F911 #029D74 #E35BD8 #4156C5 #635688
The letters "C0" are added to signify that simply publishing a number is "Crime Zero."
Spread the word.
This work is in the public domain worldwide because it has been so released by the copyright holder.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
This work is free and may be used by anyone for any purpose. If you wish to use this content, you do not need to request permission as long as you follow any licensing requirements mentioned on this page.
Wikimedia has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page. This correspondence has been reviewed by an OTRS member and stored in our permission archive. The correspondence is available to trusted volunteers here.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Free Will

* Meynell, Alice (1917), "Free Will" in A father of women, and other poems.
* Meynell, Alice (1921), "Free Will" in Poems.
# Free as in Freedom

Biography of Internet freedom activist Richard M. Stallman.
* Free as in Freedom (2002).
* Free as in Freedom 2.0 (2010) with revisions by Richard M. Stallman. (Not hostable due to imcompatible license. External scan link)
# Fidelia/Part 2

PART II
# Fidelity

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Fidelity."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Fidelity, a poem by Letitia Elizabeth Landon (Poetic Sketches. Fifth Series I.)
* Fidelity, a poem by William Wordsworth
# Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company v. Rothensies

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
324 U.S. 108
Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company v. Rothensies
Argued: Jan. 4, 5, 1945. --- Decided: Feb 5, 1945
Mr. C. Russell Phillips, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioners.
Mr. L. W. Post, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fidelia/Part 1

PART I
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Maude Clare

MAUDE CLARE.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/May

MAY.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Mirage

MIRAGE.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Noble Sisters

NOBLE SISTERS.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Old and New Year Ditties:—No. 1

OLD AND NEW YEAR DITTIES.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Love from the North

LOVE FROM THE NORTH.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/My Dream

MY DREAM.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/My Secret

MY SECRET.
# Gillis v. Stinchfield/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
159 U.S. 658
Gillis v. Stinchfield
Neither in the pleadings, nor in the proceedings during the trial, nor in the specifications of error below, was any federal question specifically raised, nor was any right, title, privilege, or immunity of a federal nature set up or claimed. Sayward v. Denny, 158 U.S. 180, 15 Sup. Ct. 777. It is, however, contended that the record shows that a federal question arose in the case, as considered by both the superior and the supreme courts, and was decided adversely to plaintiffs in error, namely, that Gillis had the right to follow what was known as the 'Rice' vein, which had its apex on the Carrington mine, upon its dip, beneath the surface of the Pine Tree mine, and to appropriate to his own use the gold found in that vein at the point of its intersection with the so-called 'West' vien, which had its apex on the Pine Tree mine, because the Carrington mine was the older or prior location; and that this could only be determined by an application of sections 2322 and 2336 of the Revised Statutes. But the decision of the supreme court was clearly based upon the estoppel deemed by that court to operate against plaintiffs in error upon general principles of law and the statute of California in respect of such a conveyance as that to Stinchfield, irrespective of any federal question. And this was an independent ground, broad enough to maintain the judgment. The writ of error must therefore be dismissed. Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U.S. 361, 14 Sup. Ct. 131; Rutland R. Co. v. Central Vt. R. Co., 16 Sup. Ct. 113.
Writ of error dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gillis v. New York N. H. & H. Railroad Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
249 U.S. 515
Gillis v. New York N. H. & H. Railroad Company
Argued: March 26 and 27, 1919. --- Decided: April 21, 1919
Action under the employers' liability statute (Act April 22, 1908, c. 149, 35 Stat. 65 [Comp. St. §§ 8657-8665]). Plaintiff in error's intestate, on March 3, 1912, while in the railroad company's service in interstate commerce, was killed, through the negligence, in whole or in part, it is charged, of one of the company's officers, agents or employes.
The defenses of the company were denial of the declaration and averments that the intestate's injuries and death were due to and caused by his own negligence and besides 'were the result of acts, conditions and circumstances the happening of which was assumed' by him.
The case was tried to a jury. At the conclusion of the testimony, upon motion of defendant and over the objection and exception of plaintiff, the court ruled that upon all of the evidence the plaintiff was not entitled to recover and directed a verdict for defendant. It was stipulated that the case was to be reported for the determination of the full court and that if the ruling and direction should be held to be right, then judgment was to be entered for defendant. 'If the case ought to have been submitted to the jury, then judgment is to be entered for the plaintiff in the sum of forty-five hundred ($4,500) dollars.' The case was so reported. The full court reviewed the testimony quite elaborately and concluded from that review that 'the only person who was negligent was the deceased, and the judge was right in directing a verdict for the defendant' and cited Great Northern Ry. v. Wiles, 240 U.S. 444, 36 Sup. Ct. 406, 60 L. Ed. 732.
That case repeated the established principle that when the evidence justifies it it is competent for a court to direct a verdict for a defendant. The principle is not attacked by plaintiff. The contention, however, is that the courts below, one of which tried the case, were wrong in their estimate of the evidence, and that plaintiff was entitled to the judgment of the jury upon it. We are unable to yield to the contention. Nor do we think it necessary to give a review of the evidence. It will be found in the opinion of the court, and we have verified its correctness. The case turns, therefore, upon an appreciation of the testimony and admissible inferences therefrom, and even if the conclusions of the courts were more disputable we should have to defer to them. Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, 242 U.S. 169, 37 Sup. Ct. 33, 61 L. Ed. 228; Erie Railroad Co. v. Welsh, 242 U.S. 303, 37 Sup. Ct. 116, 61 L. Ed. 319.
Judgment affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gillis v. New York N. H. & H. Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
249 U.S. 515
Gillis v. New York N. H. & H. Railroad Company
Argued: March 26 and 27, 1919. --- Decided: April 21, 1919
Messrs. James J. McCarthy and H. La Rue Brown, both of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff in error.
Mr. John L. Hall, of Boston, Mass., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McKENNA delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse