OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Fox Film Corporation v. Knowles

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
261 U.S. 326
Fox Film Corporation v. Knowles
Argued: Feb. 27, 1923. --- Decided: March 12, 1923
Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat and Saul E. Rogers, both of New York City, and William J. Hughes, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Mr. Louis R. Bick, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from page 327 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fox Film Corporation v. Muller

Fox Film Corp. v. Muller, 296 U.S. 207 (1935), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that it cannot exert certiorari jurisdiction over a case in which there is an adequate and independent state law ground for the state court's final judgment. Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
296 U.S. 207
Fox Film Corporation v. Muller
Argued: and Submitted Nov. 15, 1935. --- Decided: Dec 9, 1935
Messrs. Charles E. Hughes, Jr., of Washington, D.C., Percy Heiliger, of New York City, and James D. Shearer, of Minneapolis, Minn., for petitioner.
Mr. Abram F. Myers, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fox Footprints

New Borzoi Poetry Spring 1923
Poems by Wilfrid Scawen Blunt
Finders by John V. A. Weaver
Golden Bird by James Oppenheim
April Twilights by Willa Cather
Fox Footprints by Elizabeth J. Coatsworth
Fox Footprints Elizabeth J. Coatsworth
New YorkAlfred · A · KnopfMCMXXIII
Copyright, 1923, by Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. Published, March 1923
Set up and printed by the Vail-Ballou Co., Binghamton, N. Y. Paper furnished by W. F. Etherington & Co., New York. Bound by H. Wolff Estate, New York.
Manufactured in the United States of America
To I. R. and M. R. C. S. in memory of our year in Asia
For permission to reprint certain of the poems in this volume thanks are due Contemporary Verse, The Century, The Dial, Harper's Magazine, The Liberator, The New East (Tokyo), Poetry (Chicago), Youth, and Asia, in whose pages many of them first appeared.
Contents
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1986, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 37 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Furman v. Georgia/Concurrence Marshall VII

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
| Introduction | I | II | III | IV | V | VI | VII | Appendices |
* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Douglas Brennan Stewart White Marshall
* Dissenting Opinions Burger Blackmun Powell Rehnquist
[p370] To arrive at the conclusion that the death penalty violates the Eighth Amendment, we have had to engage in a long and tedious journey. The amount of information that we have assembled and sorted is enormous. [p371] Yet, I firmly believe that we have not deviated in the slightest from the principles with which we began.
At a time in our history when the streets of the Nation's cities inspire fear and despair, rather than pride and hope, it is difficult to maintain objectivity and concern for our fellow citizens. But, the measure of a country's greatness is its ability to retain compassion in time of crisis. No nation in the recorded history of man has a greater tradition of revering justice and fair treatment for all its citizens in times of turmoil, confusion, and tension than ours. This is a country which stands tallest in troubled times, a country that clings to fundamental principles, cherishes its constitutional heritage, and rejects simple solutions that compromise the values that lie at the roots of our democratic system.
In striking down capital punishment, this Court does not malign our system of government. On the contrary, it pays homage to it. Only in a free society could right triumph in difficult times, and could civilization record its magnificent advancement. In recognizing the humanity of our fellow beings, we pay ourselves the highest tribute. We achieve "a major milestone in the long road up from barbarism" and join the approximately 70 other jurisdictions in the world which celebrate their regard for civilization and humanity by shunning capital punishment.
I concur in the judgments of the Court.

#### Footnotes

* ↑ R. Clark, Crime in America 336 (1970).
* ↑ Some jurisdictions have de facto abolition; others have de jure. Id., at 330; Hearings, supra, n. 80, at 9-10 (statement of M. DiSalle). See generally Patrick, The Status of Capital Punishment: A World Perspective, 56 J. Crim. L. C. & P. S. 397 (1965); United Nations, supra, n. 77, ¶¶ 10-17, 63-65, at 83-85, 96-97; Brief for Petitioner in No. 68-5027, App. E (Aikens v. California, 406 U.S. 813 (1972)).
# Francis v. United States (188 U.S. 375)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
188 U.S. 375
Francis v. United States
Argued: October 16, 17, 1901. ---
Ordered for reargument before full bench November 10, 1902.
Reargued December 15, 16, 1902.
Decided February 23, 1903.
Messrs. Miller Outcalt, George F. Edmunds, and Thomas F. Shay for petitioners on original argument.
Messrs. Miller Outcalt and John G. Carlisle for petitioners on reargument.
Assistant Attorney General Beck for respondent.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Francis v. Southern Pacific Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
333 U.S. 445
Francis v. Southern Pacific Company
Argued: Feb. 5, 1948. --- Decided: March 15, 1948
Mr. Parnell Black, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for petitioners.
Mr. Paul H. Ray, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Francis v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Francis v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Francis v. United States (72 U.S. 338)
* Francis v. United States (96 U.S. 354)
* Francis v. United States (188 U.S. 375)
# Francis v. United Jersey Bank

* related portals: New Jersey case law.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
87 N.J. 15; 432 A.2d 814
JOHN J. FRANCIS, HUGH P. FRANCIS AND J. RAYMOND BERRY, TRUSTEES OF PRITCHARD & BAIRD INTERMEDIARIES CORP., PRITCHARD & BAIRD, INC., P & B INTERMEDIARIES CORP., AND P & B, INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS v. UNITED JERSEY BANK, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES H. PRITCHARD, LILLIAN P. OVERCASH, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF LILLIAN G. PRITCHARD AND LILLIAN P. OVERCASH, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 171 N.J. Super. 34 (1979)
No. A-156 Argued: May 5, 1980, Argued --- Decided: July 1, 1981, Decided
Clive S. Cummis argued the cause for appellants (Sills, Beck, Cummis, Radin & Tischman, attorneys; Thomas J. Demski, of counsel; Thomas J. Demski and Kenneth F. Oettle, on the brief).
Hugh P. Francis argued the cause for respondents (Francis and Berry, attorneys).
For affirmance — Justices Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford, Schreiber, Handler and Pollock. For reversal — none. The opinion of the Court was delivered by Pollock, J.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Footsteps of Dr. Johnson (Scotland)/Text Illustrations

LIST OF TEXT ILLUSTRATIONS.
Layout 2
# Footsteps of Dr. Johnson (Scotland)/Full Page Illustrations

LIST OF FULL PAGE ILLUSTRATIONS AND MAP.
Layout 2
# Footsteps of Dr. Johnson (Scotland)/Map

George Philip & Son
Sampson Low & Co, Limited, London.
Layout 2
# Frosch v. Walter

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
228 U.S. 109
Frosch v. Walter
Argued: March 17 and 18, 1913. --- Decided: April 7, 1913
Messrs. Ralph P. Barnard, Benjamin F. Leighton, and Guy H. Johnson for appellant Catharine M. S. Frosch.
Mr. M. J. Colbert for appellants Oscar Walter et al.
Mr. Hugh T. Taggart for appellant Ida S. Monday et al.
Mr. Oliver Metzerott for appellants Henry C. and Frederick L. Walter.
Messrs. James B. Archer, Andrew Lipscomb, and John Lewis Smith for appellee.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Frost

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Frost."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, taxonomy, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
The Frost:
* "The Frost", a poem by Hannah Flagg Gould
* "The Frost", a Russian fairy tale
# Frontiers/Front and end matter

THE ROMANES LECTURE 1907
Frontiers
BY THE RIGHT HONOURABLE
LORD CURZON OF KEDLESTON
D.C.L., LL.D., F.R.S.
ALL SOULS COLLEGE, CHANCELLOR OF THE UNIVERSITY
DELIVERED IN THE SHELDONIAN THEATRE, OXFORD NOVEMBER 2, 1907
SECOND EDITION
OXFORD
AT THE CLARENDON PRESS
1908
HENRY FROWDE, M.A PUBLISHER TO THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD LONDON, EDINBURGH NEW YORK AND TORONTO
OXFORD PRINTED AT THE CLARENDON PRESS BY HORACE HART, M.A. PRINTER TO THE UNIVERSITY
# February 26, 1776 General Orders

The Writings of George Washington from the Original Manuscript Sources, 1745-1799
Head Quarters, Cambridge, February 26, 1776.
Parole New York. Countersign Lee.
The Commanding Officers of Regiments are immediately to order all the Axes—Pick-axes—Spades—Shovels, and other intrenching Tools, now in their possession, to be forthwith sent to the Qr. Master General’s Store in Cambridge.
All Officers, non-commissioned Officers and Soldiers are positively forbid playing at Cards, and other Games of Chance. At this time of public distress, men may find enough to do in the service of their God, and their Country, without abandoning themselves to vice and immorality.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# February

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "February."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "February", a poem by Helen Hunt Jackson
* "February", a poem by Thomas Henry Kendall
* "February", a poem by Sara Teasdale
* "February", a poem by Karel Toman

### See also

* "February," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
# Fed Up

I ain't a timid man at all, I'm just as brave as most, I'll take my chance in open fight and die beside my post; But riding round the 'ole day long as target for a Krupp, A-drawing fire from Koppies -- well, I'm fair fed up.
It's wonderful how few get hit, it's luck that pulls us through; Their rifle fire's no class at all, it misses me and you; But when they sprinkle shells around like water from a cup From that there blooming pom-pom gun -- well, I'm fed up.
We never get a chance to charge, to do a thrust and cut, I'll have to chuck the Cavalry and join the Mounted Fut. But after all -- What's Mounted Fut? I saw them t'other day, They occupied a koppie when the Boers had run away. The Cavalry went riding on and seen a score of fights, But there they kept them Mounted Fut three solid days and nights -- Three solid starving days and nights with scarce a bite or sup. Well! after that on Mounted Fut I'm fair fed up.
And tramping with the Footies ain't as easy as it looks, They scarcely ever see a Boer except in picture books. They do a march of twenty mile that leaves 'em nearly dead, And then they find the bloomin' Boers is twenty miles ahead. Each Footy is as full of fight as any bulldog pup, But walking forty miles to fight -- well, I'm fed up.
So after all I think that when I leave the Cavalry I'll either join the ambulance or else the A.S.C.; They've always tucker in the plate and coffee in the cup, But bully beef and biscuits -- well! I'm fair fed up!
This work is in the public domain in Australia because it was created in Australia and the term of copyright has expired. According to Australian Copyright Council - Duration of Copyright, the following works are public domain:
* published non-government works whose author died before January 1, 1955,
* anonymous or pseudonymous works and photographs published before January 1, 1955, and
* government works published more than 50 years ago (before January 1, 1974).
This work is also in the public domain in the United States because it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days), and it was first published before 1989 without complying with U.S. copyright formalities (renewal and/or copyright notice) and it was in the public domain in Australia on the URAA date (January 1, 1996). This is the combined effect of Australia having joined the Berne Convention in 1928, and of 17 USC 104A with its critical date of January 1, 1996.
Because the Australian copyright term in 1996 was 50 years, the critical date for copyright in the United States under the URAA is January 1, 1946.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Febre v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 1225
Febre v. United States
This is an application for bail pending applicant's appeal to the Court of Appeals from a narcotics conviction.
The Government, while not contending that the appeal is frivolous or taken for purposes of delay, seeks to support the lower court's denial of bail on the score that it was found that applicant, if released on bail, would present a danger to the community, and further that he was a poor bail risk. See 18 U.S.C. § 3148; Fed.Rule Crim.Proc. 46(a)(2).
My difficulty with this position is twofold: First, so far as the papers reveal, the District Court in denying bail did not 'state in writing the reasons' for its action, as required by Fed.Rule App.Proc. 9(b). Second, it does not appear why the matter was not remanded to the District Court for compliance with Rule 9(b), as the Court of Appeals had done in the case of an earlier similar bail application by a codefendant; and neither Judge Smith, nor Judge Anderson on reapplication, otherwise explained his refusal to disturb the District Court's determination. With no record of the proceedings below before me, I cannot assume, as the Government would have me do, that either Judge Smith or Judge Anderson regarded the District Court's findings on remand respecting the codefendant as equally applicable to this applicant.
While I have always been particularly reluctant to interfere with a denial of bail below pending appeal to the Court of Appeals, I do not think that I should act in this instance without more light from the lower courts. I shall therefore remand the matter to Judge Smith or Judge Anderson, as the case may be, for appropriate explication, meanwhile holding this application in abeyance.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gammer Gurton's garland of nursery songs and Toby Tickle's collection of riddles/The good child's reward

THE GOOD CHILD'S REWARD.
Come pretty Master—pretty Miss,
Be good and gain a book like this;
Come learn your Tasks and Scholars be,
Your Friends 'twill pleasure mightily.
This pretty Gift I will present
To all who are on learning bent;
And if you read this Book to me,
The Rarce Show you then will see.
—— F I N I S. ——
# Gammer Gurton's garland of nursery songs and Toby Tickle's collection of riddles/Trundling a hoop

TRUNDLING A HOOP.
Little boys come out to play,
The moon doth shine as bright as day;
Leave your supper, leave your sleep,
And come with your playfellows into the street; Come with a hoop, and come with a call,
Come with a good wilt, or not at all.
Up the ladder and down the wall,
A half-penny roll will serve us all.
You'll find milk, and I'll find flour,
And we'll have a pudding in half an hour.
# Gandia v. Pettingill

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
222 U.S. 452
Gandia v. Pettingill
Argued: December 14, 1911. --- Decided: January 9, 1912
Messrs. Frederick D. McKenney, John Spalding Flannery, William Hitz, and H. H. Scoville for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 453-455 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Willis Sweet and George H. Lamar for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 455 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gandy v. Main Belting Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
143 U.S. 587
Gandy v. Main Belting Company
STATEMENT BY MR JUSTICE BROWN.
This was a bill in equity for the infringement of letters patent No. 228, 186, issued June 1, 1880, to Maurice Gandy, for an improved belt or band for driving machinery, and an improved mechanical process of manufacturing the same. In his application the patentee stated that his invention consisted-First, of an improved cotton belt; second, of an improved mechanical process for making cotton belts. 'The belt consists-First, of cotton canvas or duck composed of warp stouter than the weft, both warp and weft being hard spun and the canvas hard and tight woven; second, of cotton canvas or duck thus made, folded and united by longitudinal rows of stitching, and stitched under tension; third, or cotton canvas thus made, folded, and stitched, saturated with linseed oil; fourth, of cotton canvas thus made, folded, stitched, and saturated with linseed oil, pressed and stretched until it is hard, even, and rigid, by which the belt is rendered insensible to the atmospheric changes, and non-elastic.'
The machinery for manfuacturing the belting is also set forth in the specification, but the only claim alleged to be infringed in this case was the second, which reads as follows: '(2) The improved article of manufacture consisting of a hard, even-surfaced, rigid, impervious, nonelastic belt, composed of cotton canvas or duck having its warp thread larger than the weft, both warp and weft being hard spun, the fabric tight-woven and folded, stitched, and saturated with linseed oil.'
The bill was in the ordinary form, and prayed for an injunction and an accounting. The answer denied that the invention was new or patentable, and also denied infringment. From a decree dismissing the bill (28 Fed. Rep. 570) the plaintiff appealed to this court.
Amos Broadnax and J. Edgar Bull, for appellants.
E. Cooper Shapley, for appellees.
Mr. Justice BROWN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gammer Gurton's garland of nursery songs and Toby Tickle's collection of riddles/The robbers

THE ROBBERS.
There was a man, and he had nought,
And robbers came to rob him;
He crept up to the chimney top,
And then they thought they had him.
But he got down on t'other side,
And then they could not find him:
He ran fourteen miles in fifteen days,
And never look'd behind him.
# Gammer Gurton's garland of nursery songs and Toby Tickle's collection of riddles/Toby Tickle

TOBY TICKLE.
Toby Tickle doth Riddles tell,
O'er nut-brown cakes and mugs of ale,
And if you guess his Puzzles here,
You shall have a Tart, my dear;
But should you try much more than once,
He will account you a great dunce.
# Gardener (Emerson)

* Gardener in May-day and other pieces (1867)
* Gardener in Poems (Household Edition, 1904)
# Gardiner v. William S. Butler & Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
245 U.S. 603
Gardiner v. William S. Butler & Company
Argued: Dec. 18, 1917. --- Decided: Feb 4, 1918
Messrs. Alexander Whiteside and Bentley W. Warren, both of Boston, Mass., and Francis B. James, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Messrs. Frederick H. Nash and Charles F. Choate, Jr., both of Boston, Mass., for respondents.
Mr. Justice HOLMES dilivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gardiner

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Gardiner."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, taxonomy, travel guide, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Gardiner, Allen Francis
* Gardiner, Arthur
* Gardiner, Bernard
* Gardiner, George
* Gardiner, James (1637-1705)
* Gardiner, James (d.1732)
* Gardiner, James (1688-1745)
* Gardiner, Marguerite
* Gardiner, Richard (1591-1670)
* Gardiner, Richard (1723-1781)
* Gardiner, Robert William
* Gardiner, Samuel
* Gardiner, Stephen
* Gardiner, Thomas (fl.1516)
* Gardiner, Thomas (1591-1652)
* Gardiner, William (1748-1806)
* Gardiner, William (1770-1853)
* Gardiner, William Nelson