OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Leaves of Grass (1860)/To One Shortly To Die

Layout 2
To One shortly To Die.
1.From all the rest I single out you, having a message for you:
You are to die—Let others tell you what they
please, I cannot prevaricate,
I am exact and merciless, but I love you—There is no escape for you.
2.Softly I lay my right hand upon you—you just
feel it,
I do not argue—I bend my head close, and half-
envelop it,
I sit quietly by—I remain faithful,
I am more than nurse, more than parent or neighbor,
I absolve you from all except yourself, spiritual,
bodily—that is eternal,
(The corpse you will leave will be but excrementitious.)
3.The sun bursts through in unlooked-for directions!
Strong thoughts fill you, and confidence—you smile!
You forget you are sick, as I forget you are sick, You do not see the medicines—you do not mind the
weeping friends—I am with you,
I exclude others from you—there is nothing to be
commiserated,
I do not commiserate—I congratulate you.
# Leaves of Grass (1860)/To The States, to Identify the 16th, 17th, or 18th Presidentiad

Layout 2
To The States,
To Identify the 16th, 17th, or 18th Prefidentiad.
Why reclining, interrogating? Why myself and all
drowsing?
What deepening twilight! Scum floating atop of the
waters!
Who are they, as bats and night-dogs, askant in the
Capitol?
What a filthy Presidentiad! (O south, your torrid suns! O north, your arctic freezings!)
Are those really Congressmen? Are those the great
Judges? Is that the President?
Then I will sleep a while yet—for I see that These States sleep, for reasons;
(With gathering murk—with muttering thunder and
lambent shoots, we all duly awake,
South, north, east, west, inland and seaboard, we will surely awake.)
# Leighton v. United States (289 U.S. 506)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
289 U.S. 506
Leighton v. United States (289 U.S. 506)
Argued: May 11, 1933. --- Decided: May 29, 1933
Messrs. Herman Weinberger, Walter Fox, Jr., and Blair S. Shuman, all of San Fra cis co., Cal., for petitioners.
The Attorney General and Mr. Paul D. Miller, of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Leisure (Davies)

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
What is this life if, full of care, We have no time to stand and stare.
No time to stand beneath the boughs And stare as long as sheep or cows.
No time to see, when woods we pass, Where squirrels hide their nuts in grass.
No time to see, in broad daylight, Streams full of stars, like skies at night.
No time to turn at Beauty’s glance, And watch her feet, how they can dance.
No time to wait till her mouth can Enrich that smile her eyes began.
A poor life this if, full of care, We have no time to stand and stare.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1940, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 83 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Leiman v. Guttman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Jackson
United States Supreme Court
336 U.S. 1
Leiman v. Guttman
Argued: Dec. 13, 1948. --- Decided: Jan 17, 1949
Mr. Samuel Marion, of New York City, for petitioner.
Messrs. Barney Rosenstein and Leo Praeger, both of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Electric Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
318 U.S. 203
Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Electric Company
Argued: Feb. 2, 1943. --- Decided: Feb 15, 1943
See 318 U.S. 800, 63 S.Ct. 758, 87 L.Ed. --.
Mr. John Flam, of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.
Mr. Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Leisure

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Leisure."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Leisure" (1916, "What is this life if, full of care"), a poem by William Henry Davies
* "Leisure" (1897), an essay by Agnes Repplier

## See also

* Leisure Hour
# Lazarus v. Prentice

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
234 U.S. 263
Lazarus v. Prentice
Argued: May 4, 1914. --- Decided: June 8, 1914
Messrs. Henry L. Lazarus, David Sessler, Girault Farrar, Herman Michel, and Eldon S. Lazarus for appellants.
Messrs. H. Generes Dufour and Edwin T. Rice for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from page 264 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Le Christianisme

So the church Christ was hit and buried Under its rubbish and its rubble. In cellars, packed-up saints long serried, Well out of hearing of our trouble.
One Virgin still immaculate Smiles on for war to flatter her. She's halo'd with an old tin hat, But a piece of hell will batter her.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lazarus v. Phelps (156 U.S. 202)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
156 U.S. 202
Lazarus v. Phelps
This was an action originally begun by William Walter Phelps to recover of the plaintiff in error, Samuel Lazarus, the rental value of 186,880 acres of land in Texas, from February 5, 1890, at 8 cents per acre. The allegation of the petition was that defendant permitted large herds of his cattle and horses to graze upon plaintiff's lands, and used them for pasturage for other cattle, for which he received hire.
The evidence showed that Phelps was the owner in fee simple of 149,716 acres of land, situated in four different counties in Texas. The land was in sections of 640 acres each, alternating with like sections owned by the public school fund of Texas, plaintiff owning the odd-numbered and the fund owning the even-numbered sections. In July, 1887, defendant, Lazarus, rented from the state, for four years from that date, the alternate sections of land so owned by it. Prior to the time of Lazarus' lease, Phelps had a much larger quantity of land, but before the trial had sold 30,000 acres.
Plaintiff's lands had been rented to Curtis and Atkinson upon a lease which expired on April 15, 1887. Curtis and Atkinson built wire fences around the land, or a greater portion of it, inclosing both the lands owned by the plaintiff and those owned by the state, which were subsequently leased to defendant. The fence was partly upon plaintiff's land, and partly upon the school land. Phelps had no cattle within the inclosure, but the settlers, some 150 in number, had about 3,000 head of cattle running at large, and mingling with defendant's cattle. Defendant had within the inclosure a number of cattle estimated by the witnesses at 10,500 head.
Plaintiff introduced testimony, which was objected to, showing that on September 17, 1888, he had instituted a suit similar to this one against the defendant, and on February 5, 1890, recovered a judgment for the use and occupation of the land to that date. Plaintiff's evidence tended to show that the land had been stocked to its full capacity. Defendant's evidence tended to prove the contrary. Plaintiff also offered evidence showing the value of the land for grazing purposes, during the time covered by this suit, to have been 4 cents per acre per annum, or $5,988.14. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $5,460.32. Defendant thereupon sued out this writ of error.
F. C. Dillard, for plaintiff in error.
Leigh Robinson, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice BROWN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lazy Harry

English-language translations of Der faule Heinz include:
# Le Crone v. McAdoo

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
253 U.S. 217
Le Crone v. McAdoo
Argued: April 26, 1920. --- Decided: June 1, 1920
Mr. George N. Baxter, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Solicitor General King, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kidnapped

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Kidnapped."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Kidnapped, being memoirs of the adventures of David Balfour in the year 1751" (1886), a novel by Robert Louis Stevenson.
* "Kidnapped" (1887), a story by Rudyard Kipling.
# Kidnapped (Stevenson)

Kidnapped was originally issued serially in Young Folks, vol. xxviii. pp. 273-275, 289-291, 305-307, 321-323, 337-339, 353-355, 369-371, 385-387, 401-403; vol. xxix. pp. 1-3, 17-19, 33-35, 49-51, 68 (May 1 to July 13, 1886). It first appeared in book form in the same year.
* Kidnapped, being Memoirs of the Adventures of David Balfour in the Year 1751 (1887), illustrated by William Brassey Hole (transcription project)
* Kidnapped, being memoirs of the adventures of David Balfour in the year 1751 (1895), a reprint of the 1887 edition using different plates.

## Film adaptations

* Kidnapped (1917), directed by Alan Crosland
# Kidnapped (Stevenson, 1887)/Advertisement

A Story of Pirates and the Spanish Main.
NEW EDITION.
With TWENTY-FIVE ILLUSTRATIONS and MAP.
Price 5s.
Treasure Island.
BY
ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON.
"A book for boys which will be delightful to all grown men who have the sentiment of treasure hunting."—Saturday Review.
"As we follow the narrative of the Jim Hawkins we hold our breath at his dangers, and breathe again at his escapes."—The Athenæum,
"Mr. Stevenson's story is skilfully constructed, and related with untiring vivacity and genuine dramatic power. It deals with a mysterious island, a buried treasure, the bold buccaneer, and all the stirring incidents of a merry life on the main,"—The Academy.
"'Treasure Island' is a real work of art, and at the same time so exciting that we are not ashamed to own that we found it difficult, when we had once begun, to lay it down before the last page was reached."—John Bull.
"Mr. Stevenson has shown an extraordinary faculty of imagination and dramatic presentation in 'Treasure Island.'"—Standard.
"We began to look at 'Treasure Island' while hungrily waiting the announcement of dinner, but when the summons came we regretted the cook's punctuality. That evening we were forced to go to the theatre, but Mr. Stevenson's book went too, and between the acts we followed Jim Hawkins, the youthful hero, together with Squire Trelawney, and Dr. Livesey, who took him on the cruise to Treasure Island, till they were embarked at Bristol on board the Hispaniola. During a short railway journey home after the theatre, we landed with the adventurers at the island, and there was most thoroughly justified the worst suspicions that had been formed concerning the crew which the Squire had so strangely got together, a crew of pirates who had sailed with Captain Kidd, and proposed to help themselves to the buried millions, after going through what was to them the unimportant trifle of cutting the throats of Trelawney, the Doctor, Jim, and their few adherents. The train stopped at our station just as Jim had embarked in the coracle to cut adrift the Hispaniola, whose crew, honest and villainous, were at war on the island itself; and, unable to wait till we reached home, we stood under a lamp-post and finished the chapter. This narrative, for the personal nature of which we apologise, will best show the reader the irresistible fascination of the book. The interest never flags. Nor is it only the broad narrative that is enthralling. The book is written with wonderful felicity of detail. One seems to be witness of the exciting events which are related."—Illustrated Sporting and Dramatic News.
CASSELL & COMPANY, Limited, Ludgate Hill, London: and all Booksellers.
Layout 2
# Law of the People's Republic of China on Regional National Autonomy

* Law of the People's Republic of China on Regional National Autonomy (1984)
* Law of the People's Republic of China on Regional National Autonomy (2001)
# Law of the People's Republic of China on Quality and Safety of Agricultural Products

* Law of the People's Republic of China on Quality and Safety of Agricultural Products (2006)
* Law of the People's Republic of China on Quality and Safety of Agricultural Products (2018)
* Law of the People's Republic of China on Quality and Safety of Agricultural Products (2022)
# Lessieur v. Price

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
53 U.S. 59
Lessieur v. Price

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lessons of the Revolution

Translated by the Bureau of International Revolutionary Propaganda
RUSSIAN REVOLUTIONARY PAMPHLETS
Lessons of the Revolution
by
VLADIMIR OULIANOW
(N. Lenin)
President of the Council of People's Commissars.
Translated from the Russian original, with Introduction and Appendix, and published by the Bureau of International Revolutionary Propaganda attached to the Commissariat for Foreign Affairs of the Provisional Workmen's and Peasants' Government of the Russian Republic.
Petrograd, January 1918.
page
RUSSIAN REVOLUTIONARY PAMPHLETS
Lessons of the Revolution
by
VLADIMIR OULIANOW
(N. Lenin)
President of the Council of People's Commissars.
Translated from the Russian original, with Introduction and Appendix, and published by the Bureau of International Revolutionary Propaganda attached to the Commissariat for Foreign Affairs of the Provisional Workmen's and Peasants' Government of the Russian Republic.
Petrograd, January 1918.
page
Printed by "Herold", 7 Rota, 26.
* Introduction
* The Soviets
* The Lessons of the Revolution
* Afterward
* One of the Radical Questions of the Revolution
* Appendix
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Lessons of the Revolution/Afterward

Afterward.
This article, as can be seen from the text, was written in July. The history of the August revolution has fully borne out the contentions stated above. Moreover, the Kornilov uprising, toward the end of August, has created a new turning point in the revolution, unmistakably proving to the people that the Cadets, in union with the counter-revolutionary generals, seek to rout the Soviets and restore the monarchy. How strong this mew turn of the revolution is, and how successful it will be in putting an end to alliances with the bourgeoisie, are questions for the near future to decide.
Sept. 6, 1917.
N. Lenin.
# Lessons of the Revolution/Introduction

INTRODUCTION.
What is the Soviet?
Of the many terms in which the social and political sciences abound, the term «people» is perhaps the vaguest. Indeed, we have no clear-cut image and hence mo effective idea of this apparently concrete entity People. Intimately connected with this term, no less vague and still more confusing, is the word «government», a word depicting a realty, as concrete and as hard as the age-old rocks themselves. The relation, however, obtaining between these two realities is in one respect clear; in as much as all the power of a people is vested in its governmet, the people is disvested of all power,—a relation so typically, and as it were monumentally expressed in the cry, «L'état c'est moi», desperately uttered by the head of the French government during the period of its ultimate decay.
The Russian Revolution, now occupying the center of the quaking world's stage, allows the careful observer to catch a glimpse of what that entity People really must be. The Russian people, struggling to assert itself, has in the travail of the Revolution given birth to a new creation flexible, mobile and yet persistent as are the thought and will it expresses. This creation is, the Soviets.
# Lesser v. Gray

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
236 U.S. 70
Lesser v. Gray
Argued: December 9, 1914. --- Decided: January 18, 1915
Messrs. Henry A. Alexander, C. Henry Cohen, and Rodney S.C.ohen for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Alexander C. King and Charles T. Hopkins for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McReynolds delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lake Erie Company v. State Public Utilities Commission of Illinois Cameron

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
249 U.S. 422
Lake Erie Company v. State Public Utilities Commission of Illinois Cameron
Argued: and Submitted March 13, 1919. --- Decided: April 14, 1919
Mr. George B. Gillespie, of Springfield, Ill., for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. C. S. Schneider, of Northwood Park, Ill., and Edward J. Brundage, of Chicago, Ill., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Journal of Discourses/Volume 21

Journal of Discourses Volume 21
BY: PRESIDENT JOHN TAYLOR
HIS COUNSELORS, THE TWELVE APOSTLES AND OTHERS.
Reported By GEORGE F. GIBBS, JOHN IRVINE AND OTHERS.
Respectfully Dedicated to the Latter-Day Saints in All the World.
VOL. XXI.
LIVERPOOL:
PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY ALBERT CARRINGTON 42, ISLINGTON.
LONDON:
LATTER-DAY SAINTS' BOOK DEPOT, 10, DORSET STREET, BRIDE STREET, LIVERPOOL ROAD, ISLINGTON.
1881
Preface
In presenting the Twenty-first Volume of the JOURNAL OF DISCOURSES to our readers, we pray that those who read the counsels therein given, may do so by the light of the Holy Spirit of Truth, that great benefit may be obtained therefrom, and that by a wise application of the teachings of God's servants, from time to time, the Saints may finally be exalted in His Heavenly Kingdom.
THE PUBLISHER
# Lawrence v. Texas/Dissent Thomas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion O’Connor
* Dissenting Opinions Scalia Thomas
Justice Thomas, dissenting.
I join Justice Scalia’s dissenting opinion. I write separately to note that the law before the Court today “is … uncommonly silly.” Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, 527 (1965) (Stewart, J., dissenting). If I were a member of the Texas Legislature, I would vote to repeal it. Punishing someone for expressing his sexual preference through noncommercial consensual conduct with another adult does not appear to be a worthy way to expend valuable law enforcement resources.
Notwithstanding this, I recognize that as a member of this Court I am not empowered to help petitioners and others similarly situated. My duty, rather, is to “decide cases ‘agreeably to the Constitution and laws of the United States.’ ” Id., at 530. And, just like Justice Stewart, I “can find [neither in the Bill of Rights nor any other part of the Constitution a] general right of privacy,” ibid., or as the Court terms it today, the “liberty of the person both in its spatial and more transcendent dimensions,” ante, at 1.
# Lawrie O'Broom's Rambles from Ireland to Scotland

* "Lawrie O'Broom's Rambles from Ireland to Scotland" in Battle of Waterloo (1815)
* "Lawrie O'Broom's Rambles from Ireland to Scotland" in Paddy's rambles (1819)
# Lawrence v. State Tax Commission of Mississippi

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
286 U.S. 276
Lawrence v. State Tax Commission of Mississippi
Argued: April 18, 1932. --- Decided: May 16, 1932
Mr. Wm. H. Watkins, of Jackson, Miss., for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from page 277 intentionally omitted]
Mr. J. A. Lauderdale, of Jackson, Miss., for appellee.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lawrence v. Tucker

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
64 U.S. 14
Lawrence v. Tucker

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Legg v. Sjohn

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
297 U.S. 695
LEGG v. ST. JOHN.
Argued: Nov. 18, 1935. --- Decided: Jan 6, 1936
Messrs. Wm. Marshall Bullitt, of Louisville, Ky., and Henry Roberts, of Bristol, Va. (Mr. J. K. Brown, of Bristol, Tenn., on the brief), for petitioner.
Mr. robert Burrow, of Bristol, Tenn., for respondent.
Mr. Clayton Scyphers, of Bristol, Va., for respondent, pro hac vice, by Special leave of Court.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse