OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Helvering v. Falk

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
291 U.S. 183
Helvering v. Falk
Argued: Dec. 11, 1933. --- Decided: Jan 15, 1934
The Attorney General andMr. Erwin N. Griswold, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Charles F. Fawsett, of Milwaukee, Wis., for respondents.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gondibert: An Heroick Poem/To Sr Will. D'Avenant, Upon His Two First Books of Gondibert (Waller)

TO
Sr Will. D'avenant,
Upon his two first Books of
GONDIBERT,
Finish'd before his Voyage to
AMERICA.
Ed. Waller.
# Gondibert: An Heroick Poem/Canto 6

CANTO the Sixth.
# Gondibert: An Heroick Poem/Canto 9

CANTO the Third.
# Gondibert: An Heroick Poem/To Sr Will. D'Avenant, Upon His Two First Books of Gondibert (Cowley)

TO
S$^r$ WIL. D'AVENANT,
Upon his two first Books of
GONDIBERT,
Finish'd before his Voyage to
America.
Ab. Cowley.
# Gondibert: An Heroick Poem/Canto 7

GONDIBERT.
The Second Book.
CANTO the First.
# Gondibert: An Heroick Poem/Canto 8

CANTO the Second.
# Gondibert: An Heroick Poem/Errata

ERRATA.
IN the PREFACE, pag. 23. line 22. for seven, r. six.
PageStanzaLineErrataMend. 002000009000001for Lusty,Lasting. 005000028000001for TrineTime. 058000076000003for ThirdsThrids. 064000034000002for this,His. 070000080000001for cease,Seise. 153000008000003for Beedles,Needles 161000067000003for how,whom. 172000034000004for morn,Moon. 219000096000002for lose,Loose. 226000041000002for weak,ourweaker.
# Good Morning!

From The Century Magazine, Aug 1916
Good Morning!
By JAMES OPPENHEIM
ARROW-SUN!
Morning, the bold young giant.
Sticks you in his bent bow of shining blue
And shoots you toward the zenith.
This way. Wind. Forget-me-nots are little;
Stoop and uplift them.
Come up. Mole, from your subterranean plunder,
The juicy tulip roots.
Dew along the gossamer, twinkle in the garden-grass:
For one is coming hither,
One is coming hither,
The darling of the morn.
She comes; in the doorway I see her.
She steps out. Good morning!
My rival, the gale, is ahead of me, kissing her lips;
Arrow-sun from the heaven darts,
Confusing with gold her glance;
Bee thinks her lips are a rose-bud.
Brush him off, darling,
And come, come hither.
I know an angle in the fence
Where lovers may say good morning.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1932, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 91 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Henry VI Part 2 (1923) Yale/Appendix E

Layout 2
APPENDIX E
Suggestions for Collateral Reading
J. O. Halliwell: The First Sketches of the Second and Third Parts of King Henry the Sixth (i.e. The First Part of the Contention and The True Tragedy). London, Shakespeare Society, 1843.
A. W. Ward: Introduction to Henry VI in Renaissance Shakespeare, New York, 1907. (Reprinted in part in Collected Papers of Sir Adolphus William Ward, iii. 231–291, Cambridge, 1921.)
C. F. Tucker Brooke: The Authorship of the Second and Third Parts of King Henry the Sixth. New Haven, 1912.
K. H. Vickers: Humphrey Duke of Gloucester. London, 1907.
L. B. Radford: Henry Beaufort, Bishop, Chancellor, Cardinal. London, 1908.
Mabel E. Christie: Henry the Sixth. London, 1922.
H. S. Bennett: The Pastons and their England. Studies in an Age of Transition. Cambridge, 1922.
Alice D. Greenwood: Selections from the Paston Letters. London, 1920. (The standard complete edition of the Paston Letters is that of James Gairdner, new edition in four volumes, Edinburgh, 1910.)
​Copiously annotated editions of the play have been prepared by W. J. Rolfe (New York, 1882) and by H. C. Hart (Arden Shakespeare, London, 1909). The edition in the Henry Irving Shakespeare, prepared by F. A. Marshall, also contains very full notes and a valuable introduction. That in the Bankside Shakespeare (New York, 1892) is useful because it presents on opposite pages the texts of The Second Part of Henry VI and of The First Part of the Contention.
# Henry VI Part 2 (1923) Yale/Text

Layout 2
The Second Part of Henry the Sixth, with the Death of the Good Duke Humphrey
* Act I
* Act II
* Act III
* Act IV
* Act V
[DRAMATIS PERSONÆ
King Henry the Sixth
Duke of Gloucester, Uncle to the King
Cardinal Beaufont, Great-Uncle to the King
Duke of York
| Edward | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | Sons of York |
| Richard | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | Sons of York |
Duke of Somerset
Duke of Buckingham
Marquess of Suffolk
Earl of Salisbury
Earl of Warwick, Son of Salisbury
Lord Clifford
Young Clifford, his Son
Lord Scales, Governor of the Tower
Lord Say
Sir John Stanley
Sir Humphrey Stafford
William Stafford, his Brother
Vaux, a Gentleman of the Court
Matthew Goffe, a Captain under Lord Scales
Alexander Iden, a Gentleman of Kent
Two Gentlemen, Prisoners with Suffolk
A Lieutenant of a Warship, Master, and Master's Mate
Walter Whitmore, an Officer under the Lieutenant
Jack Cade, a Rebel Leader
| John Hume | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | Priests |
| John Southwell | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | Priests |
Roger Bolingbroke, a Scholar and Conjurer
Mayor of Saint Albans
Clerk of Chatham
Simpcox, an Impostor
Thomas Horner, an Armourer
Peter Thump, His Apprentice
Two Murderers
A Spirit raised by Bolingbroke
Margaret of Anjou, Queen to King Henry
Eleanor, Duchess of Gloucester
Margery Jordan, a Witch
Simpcox's Wife
Scene: London and its environs, Saint Albans, Bury St. Edmunds, Kenilworth Castle, and several parts of Kent.]
# Henry VI Part 3 (1923) Yale

* related portals: The Yale Shakespeare.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, quotes, Wikidata item.
Part of The Yale Shakespeare series.
Layout 2
∵ The Yale Shakespeare ∵
THE THIRD PART OF KING HENRY THE SIXTH
EDITED BY TUCKER BROOKE
NEW HAVEN · YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON · HUMPHREY MILFORD OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS · MCMXXIII
Copyright, 1923 By Yale University Press
First published, 1923
PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TABLE OF CONTENTS :
| | PAGE |
| The Text | 1 |
| Act I | 1 |
| Act II | 23 |
| Act III | 49 |
| Act IV | 70 |
| Act V | 93 |
| Notes | 114 |
| Appendix A. Sources of the Play | 133 |
| Appendix B. The History of the Play | 135 |
| Appendix C. Authorship | 139 |
| Appendix D. The Text of the Present Edition | 141 |
| Appendix E. Suggestions for Collateral Reading | 143 |
| Index of Words Glossed | 144 |
The facsimile opposite reproduces the title-page of the Elizabethan Club copy of Thomas Pavier's (1619) edition of the two plays upon which the second and third parts of 'King Henry VI' were based. Shakespeare's name is here for the first time connected with them
THE YALE SHAKESPEARE
Edited by
Wilbur L. CrossTucker Brooke
Published under the Direction
of the
Department of English, Yale University,
on the Fund
Given to the Yale University Press in 1917
by the Members of the
Kingsley Trust Association
(Scroll and Key Society of Yale College)
To Commemorate the Seventy-Fifth Anniversary
of the Founding of the Society
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1946, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 77 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# History of the German people at the close of the Middle Ages

In 16 volumes
* History of the German People at the close of the Middle Ages, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co, Ltd. (1896-1910):
** Vol. I: Popular Education and Science – Art and Popular Literature – Political Economy, 1896. (transcription project)
** Vol. II. The Holy Roman Empire, 1896.
** Vol III: The Revolution Party and its Proceedings – The Diet of Worms and the Progress of the Politico-Clerical Revolution, 1900.
** Vol. IV: The Social Revolution, 1900.
** Vol. V: Propagation and Systematising of the New Doctrines – Plan of War Against the Emperor – The League of Smalcald – The Zwinglian Religious Disturbance in Suabia – Fresh Overtures of Peace from the Emperor, 1903.
** Vol. VI: The Smalcaldian War and Internal Disintegration Down to the So-Called Religious Peace of Nuremberg, 1912.
** Vol. VII: General Conditions of the German People from the So-Called Religious Pacification of Augsburg in 1555 to the Proclamation of the Formula of Concord in 1580, 1905.
** Vol. VIII: General Conditions of the German People from the So-Called Religious Pacification of Augsburg in 1555 to the Proclamation of the Formula of Concord in 1580 (Cont.),1905.
** Vol. IX: The Politico-Religious Revolution from the Proclamation of the Formula of Concord in 1580 up to the Year 1608, 1906.
** Vol. X: Leading up to the Thirty Years' War, 1906.
** Vol. XI: Art and Popular Literature to the Beginning of the Thirty Years' War, 1907.
** Vol. XII: Art and Popular Literature to the Beginning of the Thirty Years' War, (Cont.), 1907.
** Vol. XIII: Schools and Universities, Science, Learning and Culture Down to the Beginning of the Thirty Years' War, 1909.
** Vol. XIV: Schools and Universities, Science, Learning and Culture Down to the Beginning of the Thirty Years' War (Cont.), 1909.
** Vol. XV: Commerce and Capital – Private Life of Different Classes – Mendicancy and Poor Relief, 1910.
** Vol. XVI: General Moral and Religious Corruption – Imperial Legislation Against Witchcraft – With Persecution from the Time of the Church Schism to the Last Third of the Sixteenth Century, 1910.
* Index Volume, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co, Ltd., 1925.
# Hopt v. People

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Hopt v. People."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Hopt v. People (104 U.S. 631)
* Hopt v. People (114 U.S. 488)
* Hopt v. People (120 U.S. 430)
# Hopt v. People (104 U.S. 631)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
104 U.S. 631
Hopt v. People
ERROR to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Utah.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. John R. McBride and Mr. J. G. Sutherland for the plaintiff in error.
The Solicitor-General, contra.
MR. JUSTICE GRAY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hopt v. People (120 U.S. 430)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
120 U.S. 430
Hopt v. People
P. L. Williams and Ben. Sheeks, for plaintiff in error.
Asst. Atty. Gen Maury, for defendant in error.
FIELD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hopt v. People of the Territory of Utah

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
110 U.S. 574
Hopt v. People of the Territory of Utah
Thos. J. Marshall, for plaintiff in error.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for defendant in error.
HARLAN, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hopt v. People (114 U.S. 488)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
114 U.S. 488
Hopt v. People
This is a writ of error to reverse a judgment rendered by the supreme court of the territory of Utah, affirming, upon appeal from the district court of the Third judicial district of the territory, a judgment and sentence of death upon a conviction of murder. The decisions of this court, after former trials of the case, are reported in 104 U.S. 631, and 110 U.S. 574; S.C.. 4 SUP. CT. REP. 202.
One of the errors now assigned in the brief filed in behalf of the plaintiff in error is that the record did not comply with the statute of Utah requiring that the written charges of the court should form part of the record. In the copy of the record of the district court contained in the record transmitted by the supreme court of the territory to this court, the statement relating to the charge of the court to the jury, and the exceptions to the charge, are as follows: On May 5th the case was finally argued by the counsel for either party, 'and the court charged the jury; defendant's counsel except generally to the instructions given by the court on its own motion, and exception allowed; and a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree was returned and entered.' And on May 16th, 'the time allowed by law for filing the bill of exceptions herein having passed, the court, upon application of defendant's counsel, refuses to further extend the time. Defendant excepts.' The record also shows that on May 10th, after judgment and sentence, a notice of appeal was filed by the defendant with the clerk, and a copy of the notice served on the district attorney.
Appended to the brief filed in this court in behalf of the United States is an affidavit, taken January 7, 1885, of the deputy clerk of the district court, testifying that the counsel for the defendant at the trial in that court, who requested him to prepare the transcript of record on appeal to the supreme court of the territory, requested him to omit the written charge given by the court to the jury at the trial, and told him that no point was to be made by the defendant upon the instructions in Childs v. Frazee, 15 S.C.. 612, in 1880, interest was recovered against a that request was delivered by the clerk to the counsel, and by them filed with the clerk of the supreme court of the territory; that by reason alone of that request the written charge was omitted from the record; and that no bill of exceptions was ever filed, or offered to be filed, or presented to the judge of the district court for settlement.
WAITE, C. J., and HARLAN, J., dissent.
R. N. Baskin, for plaintiff in error.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for defendant in error.
GRAY, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hoyt v. Hammekin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
55 U.S. 346
Hoyt v. Hammekin
Mr. Justice Curtis was necessarily absent when this case was considered and decided.
This was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Texas.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
It was argued by Mr. Allen, for the appellant, with whom was Mr. Hale, and by Mr. Hughes, for the appellee.
Mr. Justice McLEAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hoyt v. Minnesota

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Blackmun
United States Supreme Court
399 U.S. 524
Melvin Lee HOYT et al. v. MINNESOTA.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hoyt v. Florida

Hoyt v. Florida, 368 U.S. 57 (1961), was an appeal by Gwendolyn Hoyt, who had killed her husband and received a jail sentence for second degree murder. Hoyt claimed that her all-male jury led to discriminate and unfair circumstances during her trial. Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
368 U.S. 57
Hoyt v. Florida
Argued: Oct. 19, 1961. --- Decided: Nov 20, 1961
Herbert B. Ehrmann, Boston, Mass., for appellant.
George R. Georgieff, Tallahassee, for appellee.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hoyt v. Minnesota/Dissent Blackmun

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Blackmun
United States Supreme Court
399 U.S. 524
Melvin Lee HOYT et al. v. MINNESOTA.
Mr. Justice BLACKMUN, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice HARLAN join, dissenting.
I am not persuaded that the First and Fourteenth Amendments necessarily prescribe a national and uniform measure-rather than one capable of some flexibility and resting on concepts of reasonableness-of what each of our several States constitutionally may do to regulate obscene products within its borders.
Here a Minnesota trial court (just as the Ohio trial court did in Walker v. Ohio, 398 U.S. 434, 90 S.Ct. 1884, 26 L.Ed.2d 385 (1970)), endeavored to apply standards articulated by this Court in prior cases and embodied in a precisely worded Minnesota statute, and reached the conclusion that the materials in question were obscene within the meaning of that statutory definition. Six of the seven Justices of the Supreme Court of that State, citing Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767, 87 S.Ct. 1414, 18 L.Ed.2d 515 (1967), and other decisions of this Court, have identified the offending material 'for what it is,' have described it is dealing 'with filth for the sake of filth,' and have held it obscene as a matter of law. 286 Minn. 92, 95, 174 N.W.2d 700, 702. I cannot agree that the Minnesota trial court and those six justices are so obviously misguided in their holding that they are to be summarily reversed on the authority of Redrup.
At this still, for me, unsettled stage in the development of state law of obscenity in the federal constitutional context I find myself generally in accord with the views expressed by Mr. Justice Harlan in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, 500-503, 77 S.Ct. 1304, 1 L.Ed.2d 1498 (1957); Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184, 203-204, 84 S.Ct. 1676, 12 L.Ed.2d 793 (1964); and A Book Named 'John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure' v. Attorney General of Com. of Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455, 458-460, 86 S.Ct. 975, 16 L.Ed.2d 1 (1966), and with those enunciated by The Chief Justice in Cain v. Kentucky, 397 U.S. 319, 90 S.Ct. 1110, 25 L.Ed.2d 335 (1970), and in Walker v. Ohio, supra.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Household Words/Volume 12

"Familiar in their Mouths as HOUSEHOLD WORDS."—Shakespeare.
HOUSEHOLD WORDS
A Weekly Journal
CONDUCTED BY
CHARLES DICKENS.
VOLUME XII.
From August 4, 1855, to January 12, 1856.
Being from No. 280 to No. 303, and also including the Extra Number and a half for Christmas.
LONDON: OFFICE, 16, WELLINGTON STREET NORTH. 1856.
LONDON:
BRADBURY AND EVANS, PRINTERS, WHITEFRIARS.
CONTENTS.
Islands, Two tight little 145, 273
* Roving Englishman—
POETRY.
The Extra Christmas Number—The Holly-Tree Inn—will be found at the end of the Volume.
# Household Words/Volume 12/The Invalid's Mother

Published in Household Words, Volume 12, without attribution. Issue 284, 1 September 1855.
THE INVALID'S MOTHER.
TO THE SUN, AT LISBON.
O sun! whose universal smile
 Brightens the various lands,
From burning Egypt's fruitful Nile
 And Lybia's desert sands—
To where some frozen Lapland hut,
 Dingy, and cold, and low,
Bids half its gleaming surface jut
 In light above the snow;
I loved thee, as a careless child,
 Where English meadows spread
Their cowslip blossoms sweet and wild
 By Thames' translucent bed!
Now, with a still and serious hope,
 I watch thy rays once more,
And cast life's anxious horoscope
 Upon a foreign shore.
O sun! that beam'd to Camöen's eyes
 Bright as thou dost to mine,
That calmly yet shall set and rise,
 On life and death to shine.
O sun! that many an eager heart
 With false hope hath beguiled.
Deal gently with me, ere we part,
 And heal the alien's child!
A stranger stands on Tagus' banks,
 And looks o'er Tagus' wave,
Oh! shall we leave here joy and thanks,
 Or weep beside a grave?
Dear rivers of my native land,
 Where paler sunshine gleams,
On your green margin shall we stand
 And laugh beside your streams;
And talk of foreign flowers and clinics
 Whose glorious radiance shed
Such pleasure o'er these travell'd times,—  Or shall we mourn our dead?
No answer comes! Beyond the sen,
 Beyond those azure skies,
A speck in God's eternity,
 Our unseen future lies!
And not as one who braves His will,
 (Which, murmur we or not,
Must guide our onward course, and still
 Decide the dreaded lot):
But with a deep, mysterious awe,
 I see that orb of light,
Which first by His creative law
 Divided day from night;
Which, looking down upon the earth
 With strong life-teeming rays ,
Compels the diamond's star-like bath,
 The red gold's sultry blaze;
Or bids some gentle fragile flower
 Burst, from its calyx cold,
To bloom, like man, its little hour,
 Then sink beneath the mould.
O sun! thou cherisher of life,
 Thou opposite of death,
Dissolver of the frost-bound strife
 That seals up Nature's breath!
Nurse of the poor man's orphan'd brood,
 God of the harvest fields,
Ripener of all earth grants for food,
 And all her beauty yields;
Deliverer of the prison'd streams
 From winter's joyless reign;
Awakener from mournful dreams
 To sound and sense again.
They fable of thee pleasant things;—  To bear our loved to thee,
The great ships spread their strong white wings,
 Like angels o'er the sea;
And daily in thy heavenly glow
 Our sick and weak we set;
Watch for the end of anxious woe.
 And sigh, "Not yet—not yet! "
O sun! look down on me and mine
 From that o'erarching sky;
Emblem of God's great glory shine,
 And His all-pitying eye;
Lest when I on that glory gaze,
 Mine eyes through tears look out,
Like one who sees with sore amaze
 And faint distressful doubt,
The changed face of some faithless friend,
 Who promised generous aid,
Was trusted, tried, and in the end,
 The trembling hope betray'd.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Household Words/Volume 12/Issue 283

"Familiar in their Mouths as HOUSEHOLD WORDS"—Shakespeare.
HOUSEHOLD WORDS.
A WEEKLY JOURNAL.
CONDUCTED BY CHARLES DICKENS.
| N$^{o.}$ 283.] | SATURDAY, AUGUST 25, 1855. | Price 2d. |
| N$^{o.}$ 283.] | SATURDAY, AUGUST 25, 1855. | Stamped 3d. |
* The Worthy Magistrate
* An Accursed Race
* The Child-Seer
* Wild Court Tamed
* Poor Angelica
* Something Like a Dramatic Author
# Impressions of Theophrastus Such

* Impressions of Theophrastus Such (2nd ed., 1879)
* Impressions of Theophrastus Such in Impressions of Theophrastus Such, Essays and Leaves from a note-book (1902)