OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Gesta Romanorum Vol. II (1871)/Of Severity; which avails less than Kindness

TALE LVIII.
OF SEVERITY; WHICH AVAILS LESS THAN KINDNESS.
A certain king had an only son named Medrus, whom he constituted his heir. The son was ungrateful to his father, who punished him by immediate disinherison. The son, thus circumstanced, fled to the king of the Persians, the rival and enemy of his parent. He stated that he was ready to serve him to the death; and excited him to make war upon the author of his being. War was accordingly declared, and they fought together for some time with equal fortune. It happened that Medrus grievously wounded the king, his father, and the blood flowed very copiously. No sooner had he perceived this, ​than shuddering at the thought of the parricide he was committing, he changed sides, and suddenly attacked the troops of the Persian monarch, and put them to flight. After this, of course, the compact was made void; and the son, returning to his father, meekly sought forgiveness, and obtained it. Thus, peace being established, he was again constituted his father's heir.
APPLICATION.
My beloved, the two kings are God and the devil. The son is the human soul, which Christ (who is God), by the effusion of his blood, redeemed.
# Gesta Romanorum Vol. II (1871)/Of Justice and Equity

TALE XLVII.
OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
A certain tyrannical and cruel knight retained in his service a very faithful servant. One day, when he had been to the market, he returned with this servant through a grove; and by the way lost thirty silver marks. As soon as he discovered the loss, he questioned his servant about it. The man solemnly denied all knowledge of the matter, and he spoke truth. But when the money was not to be found, ​he amputated the servant's foot, and leaving him in that place, rode home. A hermit, hearing the groans and exclamations of the man, went speedily to his assistance. He confessed him; and being satisfied of his innocence, conveyed him upon his shoulders to his hermitage. Then entering the oratory, (32) he dared to reproach the All-just with want of justice, inasmuch as he had permitted an innocent man to lose his foot. For a length of time, he continued in tears, and prayers, and reproaches; until at last an angel of the Lord appeared to him, and said, "Hast thou not read in the Psalms, 'God is a just judge, strong and patient?'" "Often," answered the hermit meekly, "have I read and believed it from my heart; but to-day I have erred. That wretched man, whose foot has been amputated, perhaps under the veil of confession deceived me." "Tax not the Lord with injustice," said the angel; "His way is truth, and His judgments equitable. Recollect how often thou hast read, 'The decrees of God are unfathomable.' Know that he who lost his foot, lost it for a former crime. With the ​same foot he maliciously spurned his mother, and cast her from a chariot—for which eternal condemnation overtook him. The knight, his master, was desirous of purchasing a war-horse, to collect more wealth, to the destruction of his soul; and therefore, by the just sentence of God, the money which he had provided for the purchase was lost. Now hear; there is a very poor man with his wife and little ones, who daily supplicate heaven, and perform every religious exercise. He found the money, when otherwise he would have starved, and therewith procured for himself and family, the necessaries of life, entrusting a portion to his confessor to distribute to the poor. But first he diligently endeavoured to find out the right owner. Not accomplishing this, the poor man applied it to its proper use. Place then a bridle upon thy thoughts; and no more upbraid the righteous Disposer of all things, as thou but lately didst. For he is true, and strong, and patient."
APPLICATION.
My beloved, the knight is a prelate; the amputation of the servant's foot is the cutting off rebellion from the church. The hermit is a prudent confessor. The angel is a pure conscience. The poor man is Christ.
Note 32.Page 174.
"Oratorie; a closet, or private chappell to pray in." Cotgrave.
# Harlem Shadows

* related portals: Harlem Renaissance.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
One of the first books published as part of the Harlem Renaissance movement
Layout 2
HARLEM SHADOWS
THE POEMS OF
CLAUDE McKAY
WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY
MAX EASTMAN
NEW YORK
HARCOURT, BRACE AND COMPANY
COPYRIGHT, 1922, BY HARCOURT, BRACE AND COMPANY, INC.
PRINTED IN THE U. S. A. BY THE QUINN & BODEN COMPANY RAHWAY. N. J.
A number of these poems appeared in the Seven Arts, Pearson's, The Liberator, The Messenger, and The Cambridge Magazine (England).
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTIONix AUTHOR'S WORDxix THE EASTER FLOWER3 TO ONE COMING NORTH4 AMERICA6 ALFONSO, DRESSING TO WAIT AT TABLE7 THE TROPICS IN NEW YORK8 FLAME HEART9 HOME THOUGHTS11 ON BROADWAY12 THE BARRIER13 ADOLESCENCE14 HOMING SWALLOWS15 THE CITY'S LOVE16 NORTH AND SOUTH17 WILD MAY18 THE PLATEAU19 AFTER THE WINTER20 THE WILD GOAT21 HARLEM SHADOWS22 THE WHITE CITY23 THE SPANISH NEEDLE24 MY MOTHER26 IN BONDAGE28 DECEMBER, 191929
HERITAGE30 WHEN I HAVE PASSED AWAY31 ​ ENSLAVED32 I SHALL RETURN33 MORNING JOY34 AFRICA35 ON A PRIMITIVE CANOE36 WINTER IN THE COUNTRY37 TO WINTER39 SPRING IN NEW HAMPSHIRE40 ON THE ROAD41 THE HARLEM DANCER42 DAWN IN NEW YORK43 THE TIRED WORKER44 OUTCAST45 I KNOW MY SOUL46 BIRDS OF PREY47 THE CASTAWAYS48 EXHORTATION: SUMMER, 191949 THE LYNCHING51 BAPTISM52 IF WE MUST DIE53 SUBWAY WIND54 THE NIGHT FIRE55 POETRY56 TO A POET57 A PRAYER58
WHEN DAWN COMES TO THE CITY60 O WORD I LOVE TO SING63 ABSENCE64 SUMMER MORN IN NEW HAMPSHIRE66 REST IN PEACE67 A RED FLOWER68 COURAGE70 ​ TO O. E. A.71 ROMANCE73 FLOWER OF LOVE75 THE SNOW FAIRY76 LA PALOMA IN LONDON78 A MEMORY OF JUNE79 FLIRTATION81 TORMENTED82 POLARITY83 ONE YEAR AFTER84 FRENCH LEAVE86 JASMINES88 COMMEMORATION89 MEMORIAL90 THIRST92 FUTILITY93 THROUGH AGONY94
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1948, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 75 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Harlem Shadows/A Memory of June

Layout 2
When June comes dancing o'er the death of May, With scarlet roses tinting her green breast,
And mating thrushes ushering in her day, And Earth on tiptoe for her golden guest,
I always see the evening when we met–– The first of June baptized in tender rain––
And walked home through the wide streets, gleaming wet, Arms locked, our warm flesh pulsing with love's pain.
I always see the cheerful little room, And in the corner, fresh and white, the bed,
Sweet scented with a delicate perfume, Wherein for one night only we were wed;
Where in the starlit stillness we lay mute, And heard the whispering showers all night long,
And your brown burning body was a lute Whereon my passion played his fevered song. ​When June comes dancing o'er the death of May, With scarlet roses staining her fair feet, My soul takes leave of me to sing all day A love so fugitive and so complete.
# Harlan v. McGourin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
218 U.S. 442
Harlan v. McGourin
ROBERT GALLAGHER et al., Appts.,
v.
THOMAS H. McGOURIN, Marshal, Appellee.
No. 379.
Argued October 11, 12, 1910.
Decided November 28, 1910.
Messrs. William W. Flournoy and J. F. Stallings for appellants.
Assistant Attorney General Harr for appellee.
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hannauer v. Woodruff/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
77 U.S. 482
Hannauer v. Woodruff
ORDER ACCORDINGLY.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hannauer v. Woodruff

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
77 U.S. 482
Hannauer v. Woodruff
ON a certificate of division in opinion between the judges of the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
The case was thus:
Woodruff made and delivered to Hannauer, at Memphis, Tennessee, on the 22d of December, 1861, a promissory note, dated that day, for $3099, with interest.
The only consideration of this note was certain bonds issued by an ordinance of the convention which attempted to carry the State of Arkansas out of the Federal Union, by what is called the secession ordinance.
These bonds were issued for the purpose of supporting the war levied by the insurrectionary bodies then controlling the State of Arkansas against the Federal government, and were styled 'War Bonds' on their face, and the purpose of their issue was well known to both parties to the note.
The bonds had at the time of the transaction a value not much below their par value on their face, say ten per cent., at Memphis and in Arkansas.
The war bonds received by Woodruff were not used, or intended to be used, by him in support of the war aforesaid.
On these facts two questions of law arose on which the judges of the circuit were divided in opinion, to wit:
1st. Was the consideration of the note void on the ground of public policy, so that no action could be sustained on it in the Federal courts?
2d. If the bonds were a sufficient consideration to sustain the action, what was the measure of damages?
The case was submitted on a brief of Mr. Garland, for the plaintiff, Hannauer; no counsel appearing contra.
Mr. Justice NELSON announced the judgment of this court, to the effect, that it being equally divided in opinion upon the questions, the case would be remitted to the court below for the purpose of enabling that court to take such action therein as it might be advised; this direction being in conformity, the learned justice observed, with the opinion of the court in Silliman v. The Hudson River Bridge Company.

## Notes

* ↑ 1 Black, 582.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hannah v. Larche Hannah

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Frankfurter

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
363 U.S. 420
John A. HANNAH et al., Appellants, v. Margaret M. LARCHE et al. John A. HANNAH et al., Petitioners,
Argued Jan. 18 and 19, 1960 on the Petition for Writ of Certiorari, theJurisdiction on Appeal, and on the Merits.
Decided June 20, 1960.
Mr. Lawrence E. Walsh, Washington, D.C., for appellants in No. 549 and for petitioners in No. 550.
Mr. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Baton Rouge, La., for appellees in No. 549.
Mr. W. M. Shaw, Homer, La., for respondents in No. 550.
Mr. Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hannah v. Larche/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
361 U.S. 910
John A. HANNAH et al., appellants, v. Margaret M. LARCHE et al.
v.
J. A. H. SLAWSON et al.
No. 550.
Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Ryan and Messrs. Harold H. Greene and David Rubin, for appellants in No. 549.
Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Ryan and Mr. Harold H. Greene, for petitioners in No. 550.
Upon consideration of the motion to advance filed by the Solicitor General wherein he states that his brief on the merits will be filed on or before December 15, 1959, the Court directs that on or before Wednesday, January 13, 1960, the appellees shall file any motion or motions responsive to the statement as to jurisdiction and on the merits of the case, the respondents shall file any brief relating to the granting or denying of the petition for writ of certiorari and on the merits of the case, and the cases are set for oral argument on Monday, January 18, 1960, on the petition for writ of certiorari, the jurisdiction on appeal, and on the merits of the cases.
The cases are consolidated for the purpose of this argument and a total of four hours is allowed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hannah v. Larche

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
361 U.S. 910
John A. HANNAH et al., appellants, v. Margaret M. LARCHE et al.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gratiot v. United States (45 U.S. 80)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
45 U.S. 80
Gratiot v. United States

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gratitude for the early Knowledge of God

This hymn was first published in Henry Formby's Catholic Hymns, 1853.
* "Gratitude for the early Knowledge of God" in Catholic Hymns (1st ed.), 1853.
* "Gratitude for the early Knowledge of God" in Catholic Hymns (2nd ed.), 1860.
# Gratitude

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Gratitude."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Gratitude, a poem by Eliza Cook
* Gratitude, a poem by Hattie Howard
* Gratitude, a poem by Lydia Huntley Sigourney (Lines written on planting slips of geranium and constancy)
* Gratitude, a poem by Lydia Huntley Sigourney
* Gratitude, a hymn by Christopher Smart
# Grau v. United States

United States Supreme Court
287 U.S. 124
Grau v. United States
Argued: Oct. 10, 1932. --- Decided: Nov 7, 1932
Messrs. Charlton B. Thompson and Stephens L. Blakely, both of Covington, Ky., for petitioner.
The Attorney General and Mr. Thomas D.Thacher, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from page 125 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gratz's Executors v. Cohen

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
52 U.S. 1
Gratz's Executors v. Cohen

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Heitler v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
260 U.S. 438
Heitler v. United States
Argued: Dec. 11, 1922. --- Decided: Jan 2, 1923
Messrs. Walter Howe, of Washington, D. C., and Weymouth Kirkland, of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Solicitor General Beck, of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
260 U.S. 245
Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Company
Argued: Nov. 14 and 15, 1922. --- Decided: Nov 27, 1922
Messrs. Louis Marshall, of New York City, and H. S. Drinker, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 246 intentionally omitted]
Mr. George E. Alter, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendants in error.
Mr. J. Weston Allen, of Boston, Mass., on behalf of nine States, amicus curiae.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 247-253 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McKENNA delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Heirs of Wilson v. Life and Fire Insurance Company of New York

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Baldwin
United States Supreme Court
37 U.S. 140
Heirs of Wilson v. Life and Fire Insurance Company of New York
ERROR to the district court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana.
Mr. Butler, for the defendants, moved to dismiss the writ of error.
1. Because no persons are named in the writ as plaintiffs; but they are described, generally, as The Heirs of Nicholas Wilson.
2. That the widow of Nicholas Wilson, who is interested in the suit, did not join in the application for the writ of error.
The motion was opposed by Coxe and Mr. Webster.
Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Heitmuller v. Stokes

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
256 U.S. 359
Heitmuller v. Stokes
Argued: April 21 and 22, 1921. --- Decided: May 16, 1921
Mr. Chapin Brown, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Wharton E. Laster, of Washington, D. C., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice DAY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Heirs of Wilson v. Life and Fire Insurance Company of New York/Dissent Baldwin

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Baldwin
United States Supreme Court
37 U.S. 140
Heirs of Wilson v. Life and Fire Insurance Company of New York
Mr. Justice BALDWIN dissented.
On consideration of the motion made in this cause by Mr. Butler, to dismiss this case for irregularity, on the ground that the writ of error does not set forth the names of all the parties, and of the arguments of counsel thereupon had, as well in support of as against the motion; it is now here ordered and adjudged by this Court, that this writ of error to the district court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and that it be so certified to the said district court.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Heiser v. Woodruff

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
327 U.S. 726
Heiser v. Woodruff
Argued: March 5, 1946. --- Decided: April 22, 1946
See 328 U.S. 879, 66 S.Ct. 1335.
Messrs.Rupert B. Turnbull and Leonard J. Meyberg, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.
Mr. Louis A. Fisckl, of Ardmore, Okl., for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from page 727 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Harding of St. Timothy's

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Commons category, Wikidata item.
   A novel of American school life with a wholesome flavor and a genuine appeal to boys. Describing the student world of "St. Timothy's," its ambitions,emulations,football jousts, etc., it presents a stirring picture in little of the rivalries, passions, errors, victories, and defeats of the larger life of which school days are the prelude. [...] Harry Harding, the titular hero of the novel, is a fine manly young fellow with unusual gifts of intellect, but marred slightly by a latent selfishness not infrequently found in boys of his type. The real hero is another sort of lad, Rupert Ormsby, a veritable Prince Rupert, whom the author paints at full length, con amore, and as tho he had intimately known the original. ... —from a review in The Literary Digest, Nov. 1906
Layout 2
HARDING OF ST. TIMOTHY'S
By Arthur Stanwood Pier
THE ANCIENT GRUDGE. Crown 8vo, $1.50.
HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN & COMPANY Boston and New York
"FELLOWS," HE SAID, "I'D LIKE TO KNOW IF YOU ARE N'T GETTING TIRED OF THIS SECRET SOCIETY BUSINESS?" (Page 178.)
HARDING OF ST. TIMOTHY'S
BY
ARTHUR STANWOOD PIER
AUTHOR OF "BOYS OF ST. TIMOTHY'S," "THE ANCIENT GRUDGE," ETC.
BOSTON AND NEW YORK
HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY
The Riverside Press, Cambridge
1906
COPYRIGHT 1906 BY ARTHUR STANWOOD PIER
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Published September 1906
Acknowledgment is made to The Youth's Companion, in which this story first appeared, under the title, "Harry Harding's Last Year."
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
* "Fellows," he said, "I'd like to know if you are n't getting tired of this secret society business?"(page 178) Frontispiece
* One of two boys ... rose and came forward to meet them8
* "The gang is going to the Pie House to-morrow afternoon to drink your health"58
* "And all that noble, noble institution, the Crown!"76
* Doctor Vincent brushed past him and knelt beside the injured boy96
* There was a pleasant twinkle in his eyes130
* Harry, with his heart beating fast, ... looked out into the antechapel198
* The rector awaited them232
* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
* Chapter VII
* Chapter VIII
* Chapter IX
* Chapter X
* Chapter XI
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1966, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 57 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Generes v. Bonnemer/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
74 U.S. 564
Generes v. Bonnemer
To permit the judge to make a statement of facts, on which the case shall be heard here, after the case is removed to this court by the service of the writ of error, or even after it is issued, would place the rights of parties who have judgments of record, entirely in the power of the judge, without hearing and without remedy. The statement of facts, filed without consent of the parties, must be treated as a nullity; and, as there is nothing on which error of the court below can be predicated, the judgment must be
AFFIRMED.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse