OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Executive Order 1938

more info.
Signed by President Woodrow Wilson Wednesday, May 13, 1914
Relating to Pardons, the Remission of Fines and Forfeitures and Other Subjects.
By virtue of the authority vested in me, I hereby establish the following Order for the Canal Zone:
Section 1. The Governor of the Panama Canal is hereby empowered to grant pardons and reprieves for offenses against the laws, orders and regulations of the Canal Zone; and to commute sentences, and remit fines and forfeitures. He may establish a system for paroling prisoners, and alter or amend the same from time to time.
Section 2. The Governor may establish regulations to govern the labor and employment of prisoners, and to provide awards for their good behavior, and upon other matters affecting the welfare of the prisoners and their management in the penal institutions of the Canal Zone, and may alter and amend such regulations from time to time.
The existing rules and regulations upon the subjects mentioned in this section shall continue in force until altered or amended by the Governor.
Section 3. This order shall take effect from and after this date.
The White House, 13 May, 1914.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 1920

more info.
Revoked by Executive Order 4421, April 17, 1926. See also Executive Order 4712, August 30, 1927.
Signed by President Woodrow Wilson Tuesday, April 21, 1914
It is hereby ordered that the tract of land in Alaska described as follows, in and surrounding the native village of Klawak, and within the Tongass National Forest, be and the same is hereby reserved, subject to any vested rights existing, for the use of the United States Bureau of Education and of the natives of indigenous Alaskan race who may there reside, viz:
    Description.—Beginning at a point on the shore of the salt bay or mouth of Klawak Stream, 114 links south of a post marked U. S. I. R. 1, which is a witness to said point on shore and stands about 40 chains eastward from Klawak village; thence northerly by a marked line 58.49 chains to a point on the shore of Klawak Harbor which is 30 links north of a witness post marked U. S. I. R. 2; thence westerly along the shore, and then around the peninsula at the mean high-tide mark to point for corner No. 1, the place of beginning; situated approximately in latitude 55° 33′ north, longitude 133° 06′ west, and estimated to contain 230 acres; as represented upon a diagram accompanying this order and made a part thereof.
The White House,
    April 21, 1914.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 1948

more info.
Amended by Executive Order 2869, May 28, 1918, and Executive Order 3130, July 25, 1919.
Signed by President Woodrow Wilson Tuesday, May 26, 1914
The area of land hereinafter described, situated in the Canal Zone, is hereby set apart and assigned to the uses and purposes of a radio station and other naval purposes under the control of the Secretary of the Navy; but said area shall be subject to the civil jurisdiction of the Canal Zone authorities in conformity with the Panama Canal Act.
The said area ia described as follows:
BALBOA NAVAL RADIO STATION.
Starting at a concrete and rail monument marked "W" on the map, and located at the southeast corner of the oil fuel storage site on Balboa dump, go on an azimuth of 307°-41′ for a distance of 1,050 feet to a similar monument marked "Z" on the map; thence on an azimuth of 217°-40′ for a distance of 780 feet to a similar monument located on top of the dump on the shore of the bay and marked "V" on the map; thence along the top of the dump following the shore to a similar monument marked "Y" on the map; thence on an azimuth of 37°-40′ and for a distance of 1,120 feet to the point of the beginning; all as shown by the blue print, No. 3836, dated January 30, 1914, issued by the Department of Construction and Engineering, Isthmian Canal Commission, office of the Assistant to the Chief Engineer.
The White House, 26 May, 1914.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 195

more info.
Signed by President Theodore Roosevelt Tuesday, December 23, 1902
1903 CSR 73
Mr. F. L. Templeton, a clerk appointed on April 10, 1900, and paid from the appropriation for postal service in the territory held by military occupation, having failed to receive permanent appointment given to others paid from the same appropriation by reason of the fact that he was assigned to duty in Washington in connection with the furnishing of supplies, may be included within the classified service of the Post-Office Department.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 191

more info.
Signed by President Theodore Roosevelt Saturday, October 4, 1902
1903 CSR 194
Special Rule.
In the exercise of the power vested in the President by the Constitution, and by virtue of the seventeen hundred and fifty-third section of the Revised Statutes, and of the civil-service act approved January 16, 1883, the following rule for the regulation and improvement of the executive civil service is hereby promulgated:
    In the interest of economy and efficiency of the service, the engineer in charge of the construction of the new Government Printing Office building may retain his present force, or so much of it as may be necessary, during the continuance of the work at the War College and Washington Barracks. The authority herein granted shall lapse upon the completion of said work, and all vacancies in the force engaged upon the printing office and upon the other work shall be filled hereafter in accordance with civil-service rules.
Approved, October 4, 1902.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Essays and studies: by members of the English Association

ESSAYS AND STUDIES
BY MEMBERS OF
THE ENGLISH ASSOCIATION
COLLECTED BY A. C. BRADLEY
OXFORD AT THE CLARENDON PRESS 1910
HENRY FROWDE, M.A. PUBLISHER TO THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD LONDON, EDINBURGH, NEW YORK TORONTO AND MELBOURNE
PREFATORY NOTE
On behalf of the English Association I beg to thank the writers of these Essays and Studies for their gifts.
It will be understood that each writer is solely responsible for his own paper, and is responsible for it alone.
We hope that similar collections will follow annually.
A. C. BRADLEY.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Essays in Historical Criticism

Contains a revised version of "The Legend of Marcus Whitman" (previously published in The American Historical Review)
Yale Bicentennial Publications
ESSAYS IN HISTORICAL CRITICISM
Yale Bicentennial Publications
With the approval of the President and Fellows of Yale University, a series of volumes has been prepared by a number of the Professors and Instructors to be issued in connection with the Bicentennial Anniversary, as a partial indication of the character of the studies in which the University teachers are engaged.
This series of volumes is respectfully dedicated to
The Graduates of the University
ESSAYS
IN
HISTORICAL CRITICISM
THE LEGEND OF MARCUS WHITMAN . THE AUTHORSHIP OF THE FEDERALIST . PRINCE HENRY THE NAVIGATOR . THE DEMARCATION LINE. THE PROPOSED ABSORPTION OF MEXICO, 1847-1848 . LEOPOLD VON RANKE, etc., etc.
BY
EDWARD GAYLORD BOURNE
Professor of History in Yale University
NEW YORK : CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS
LONDON: EDWARD ARNOLD
1901
Copyright, 1901,
By Yale University.
Published, September, 1901.
UNIVERSITY PRESS • JOHN WILSON AND SON • CAMBRIDGE, U.S.A.
PREFACE
The first essay in this collection, The Legend of Marcus Whitman, although bearing the same title as the article which I published in The American Historical Review last January, is substantially a new piece of work. In Part II the material contained in that article is reproduced and in addition the testimony of the sponsors of the story and of their supporters has been subjected to rigorous criticism, and the origin of some of its peculiar elements has been brought to light. The distinguishing feature, however, of the essay as published here is the full presentation of the literary history of the legend. It is my hope that this account of the genesis, diffusion, and wide acceptance in the latter half of the nineteenth century of a narrative about a momentous event in American history that is as unhistorical as the legend of the Donation of Constantine will prove to be a serviceable contribution to the literature of historical criticism.
The circumstances of the preparation or publication of these essays are indicated in the footnotes, except in the cases of the short paper on The Federalist Abroad, which formed part of an Introduction to a new edition of The Federalist in the Universal Classics, and of The Beginning of the Seminary Method in Teaching History which was ​contributed to The Educational Review. All the essays have been revised, and in some cases slight additions have been made.
E. G. B.
CONTENTS
I
THE LEGEND OF MARCUS WHITMAN:
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
XI
XII
XIII
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Essays in Anarchism and Religion, Volume 1

Essays in Anarchism and Religion — Vol. I — Alexandre Christoyannopoulos & Matthew S. Adams (eds.)
​Contents
Acknowledgementsix
Anarchism and Religion: Mapping an Increasingly Fruitful Landscape1 Alexandre Christoyannopoulos & Matthew S. Adams
The Catholic Worker, Dorothy Day, and Exemplary Anarchism18 Benjamin J. Pauli
Mutuality, resistance and egalitarianism in a late colonial Bakongo Christian movement51 Ruy Llera Blanes
Why Anarchists Like Zen? A Libertarian Reading of Shinran (1173–1263)78 Enrique Galván-Álvarez
Was the historical Jesus an anarchist? Anachronism, anarchism and the historical Jesus124 Justin Meggitt
A Reflection on Mystical Anarchism in the Works of Gustav Landauer and Eric Voegelin198 Franziska Hoppen
The Anarchē of Spirit: Proudhon's Anti-theism & Kierkegaard's Self in Apophatic Perspective238 Simon D. Podmore
Does religious belief necessarily mean servitude? On Max Stirner and the hardened heart283 Hugo Strandberg
Contributors308
Index312
# English Fairy Tales/The Strange Visitor

The Strange Visitor
A WOMAN was sitting at her reel one night;
And still she sat, and still she reeled, and still she wished for company.
In came a pair of broad broad soles, and sat down at the fireside;
And still she sat, and still she reeled, and still she wished for company.
In came a pair of small small legs, and sat down on the broad broad soles; ​And still she sat, and still she reeled, and still she wished for company.
In came a pair of thick thick knees, and sat down on the small small legs; And still she sat, and still she reeled, and still she wished for company.
In came a pair of thin thin thighs, and sat down on the thick thick knees; And still she sat, and still she reeled, and still she wished for company.
In came a pair of huge huge hips, and sat down on the thin thin thighs; And still she sat, and still she reeled, and still she wished for company.
In came a wee wee waist, and sat down on the huge huge hips; And still she sat, and still she reeled, and still she wished for company.
In came a pair of broad broad shoulders, and sat down on the wee wee waist; And still she sat, and still she reeled, and still she wished for company.
In came a pair of small small arms, and sat down on the broad broad shoulders; And still she sat, and still she reeled, and still she wished for company.
​In came a pair of huge huge hands, and sat down on the small small arms; And still she sat, and still she reeled, and still she wished for company.
In came a small small neck, and sat down on the broad broad shoulders; And still she sat, and still she reeled, and still she wished for company.
In came a huge huge head, and sat down on the small small neck.
“How did you get such broad broad feet?” quoth the woman. “Much tramping, much tramping” (gruffly).
“How did you get such small small legs?” “Aih-h-h!—late—and wee-e-e—moul” (whiningly).
“How did you get such thick thick knees?” “Much praying, much praying” (piously).
“How did you get such thin thin thighs?” “Aih-h-h!—late—and wee-e-e—moul” (whiningly).
“How did you get such big big hips?” “Much sitting, much sitting” (gruffly).
“How did you get such a wee wee waist?” “Aih-h-h!—late—and wee-e-e—moul” (whiningly). ​“How did you get such broad broad shoulders?” “With carrying broom, with carrying broom” (gruffly).
“How did you get such small arms?” “Aih-h-h!—late—and we-e-e—moul” (whiningly).
“How did you get such huge huge hands?” “Threshing with an iron flail, threshing with an iron flail” (gruffly).
“How did you get such a small small neck?” “Aih-h-h!—late—wee-e-e—moul” (pitifully).
“How did you get such a huge huge head?” “Much knowledge, much knowledge” (keenly).
“What do you come for?” “For you!” (At the top of the voice, with a wave of the arm, and a stamp of the feet.)
# English Fairy Tales/The Magpie's Nest

See note 36
The Magpie's Nest.
Once upon a time when pigs spoke rhyme, And monkeys chewed tobacco, And hens took snuff to make them tough, And ducks went quack, quack, quack, O!
ALL the birds of the air came to the magpie and asked her to teach them how to build nests. For the magpie is the cleverest bird of all at building nests. So she put all the birds round her ​and began to show them how to do it. First of all she took some mud and made a sort of round cake with it.
"Oh, that's how it's done," said the thrush; and away it flew, and so that's how thrushes build their nests.
Then the magpie took some twigs and arranged them round in the mud.
"Now I know all about it," said the blackbird, and off he flew, and that's how the blackbirds make their nests to this very day.
Then the magpie put another layer of mud over the twigs.
"Oh, that's quite obvious," said the wise owl, and away it flew; and owls have never made better nests since.
After this the magpie took some twigs and twined them round the outside.
"The very thing!" said the sparrow, and off he went; so sparrows make rather slovenly nests to this day.
Well, then Madge Magpie took some feathers and stuff, and lined the nest very comfortably with it.
"That suits me," cried the starling, and off it flew; and very comfortable nests have starlings.
So it went on, every bird taking away some knowledge of how to build nests, but none of them waiting to the end. Meanwhile Madge Magpie went on working and working without looking up till the only bird that remained was the turtle-dove, and that hadn't paid any attention all along, but only kept ​on saying its silly cry: "Take two, Taffy, take two-o-o-o."
At last the magpie heard this just as she was putting a twig across. So she said: "One's enough."
But the turtle-dove kept on saying: "Take two, Taffy, take two-o-o-o."
Then the magpie got angry and said: "One's enough, I tell you."
Still the turtle-dove cried: "Take two, Taffy, take two-o-o-o."
At last, and at last, the magpie looked up and saw nobody near her but the silly turtle-dove, and then she got rarely angry and flew away, and refused to tell the birds how to build nests again. And that is why different birds build their nests differently.
# Evaluation of the Handling of the Branch Davidian Stand-off in Waco, Texas/Mass Suicide or Mass Murder?

The medical examiner has determined that Koresh, Schneider and a number of other individuals who died in the compound on April 19, did not die from the fire, but died from gunshot wounds. It is not known whether these individuals committed suicide or were shot by others.
Former Davidian Dana Okimoto reported to authorities in an interview on May 27, 1993, after the fire, that Koresh's biggest fear was that someone would take his wives away and that he felt that rather than letting someone take his wife, the wife should kill herself and if she could not do so one of the "mighty men" should do it, since this was one of their duties. Therefore, if people were shot within the compound it may have been in accordance with the above plan. It is also possible that some people were shot to prevent their escape from the compound. We may never know what really happened.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Koresh's "mighty men" were his inner circle responsible for enforcing discipline within the compound. The core of this group had been in the shoot-out with George Roden in 1987 and had been acquitted by a local jury. The term "mighty men" comes from the Bible.
* ↑ The Arson Report observes that: A great many of the occupants could have escaped to the outside of the compound even as the building burned. An exact number cannot be determined. However, considering the observable means of exit available, we must assume that many of the occupants were either denied escape from within or refused to leave until escape was not an option.
# Evaluation of the Handling of the Branch Davidian Stand-off in Waco, Texas/FBI Restraint

The stand-off with the Davidians presented a significant danger to the FBI personnel who were stationed within range of the compound's weaponry. Investigation by the ATF revealed that by February 28, 1993 Koresh and his associates had at least 243 total firearms, including two 50 caliber semi-automatic rifles, numerous assault rifles, shotguns, revolvers and pistols. The Davidians also purchased hundreds of grenades and 39 "full auto sears" devices used to convert semi-automatic weapons into automatic weapons. On February 28 shots were fired from over forty different positions within the compound. The Davidians were trained in the use of these weapons. Moreover, there was concern that the Davidians had dug tunnels fanning out from the compound and planned to place explosives in the tunnels under FBI positions.
There is no evidence of any shots being fired at the compound by law enforcement officers after the cease fire on February 28, 1993. We have reviewed the statements of the agents who participated in the tear gas assault on April 19, 1993 and none of them claim to have fired their weapons on April 19. SAC Jamar and ASAC Rogers both state that the FBI did not fire on the compound that day. However, rounds were being fired from the compound at the FBI on April 19th. Also, agents reported hearing gunfire within the compound.
The FBI demonstrated admirable restraint in not firing back on April 19 and thereby avoided being provoked into a gun battle with the Davidians. Outside agencies present on April 19 praised the FBI's professionalism in their execution of the gas assault.

## Footnotes

* ↑ HRT members threw diversionary "flash-bangs" at some Davidians who came outside the compound after the Davidians had been told not to do so near the end of the stand-off. Although flash-bangs make a loud noise which might be mistaken for a gunshot, they are non-lethal devices only intended to stun and confuse the target.
# Evaluation of the Handling of the Branch Davidian Stand-off in Waco, Texas/Introduction

This is a critical retrospective evaluation of the activities of the United States Department of Justice ("Department") and the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") during the fifty-one day stand-off at the Branch Davidians' Mt. Carmel compound near Waco, Texas which ended on April 19, 1993 when fire consumed the compound, killing David Koresh and most of his followers. To make this evaluation, I have reviewed the procedures followed by the Department and the FBI, giving particular attention to the means employed, the alternatives considered and the decisions made in attempting to resolve the stand-off.
I have not been called upon to conduct a de novo factual inquiry. A comprehensive factual report is being prepared by the Department and the FBI. I have primarily relied upon the record gathered by the Department as the basis for the conclusions in this Report, supplemented by a number of follow-up interviews. However, I am satisfied that the factual inquiry by the Department was conducted in a thorough and objective manner.
Prior to my appointment, the Department had completed over 800 field interviews and gathered pertinent documentation. They continued to gather documents and conduct interviews thereafter. I have been afforded access to documents gathered in that effort and to the reports of interviews conducted for the factual investigation. In addition, since my appointment I participated in a number of Department interviews. I have also conducted independent interviews of some witnesses.
The scope of this Report is confined to the activities of the Department and the FBI. I have not been asked to evaluate and I make no judgments about the activities of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms ("ATF") leading up to the February 28, 1993 gun battle at Mount Carmel. I have been assisted in my investigation and writing of this Report by Ms. Suzan E. DeBusk, Esq. whose invaluable contribution, I gratefully acknowledge.
# Evaluation of the Handling of the Branch Davidian Stand-off in Waco, Texas/Recommendations

The Davidians were given every opportunity to leave the compound. Ultimately, under Koresh's total control, some or all of them chose to kill themselves, to kill each other and to murder their own children, rather than to surrender to law enforcement authorities and face the consequences of their armed resistance of the ATF. In the final analysis the deaths of the Davidians were caused by David Koresh.
However, the Department and the FBI should review several areas of operation in order to improve the odds in any similar confrontation in the future:
* Evaluate the roles of the HRT and the hostage negotiators in resolving similar crises.
* Evaluate the adequacy of the communications among the different elements in a crisis, particularly between the negotiating and tactical elements. This should be reviewed in the context of the process of gathering and evaluating information. Regular joint strategy meetings should probably be required during the crisis.
* Evaluate the size of the HRT.
* Evaluate the need to rotate the Crisis Management Team if any crisis becomes too extended. Fatigue may have been the single most debilitating factor working against the FBI in the stand-off.
* REDACTED FROM PUBLIC REPORT PENDING RELEASEOF IMPOUNDED MATERIAL.
* Evaluate funding for the development of a chemical means to render individuals unconscious for a period of time without warning.
# Executive Order 5986

more info.
See the Notes section for a list of Executive Orders affected by or related to the issuance of this Executive Order.
Signed by President Herbert Hoover Tuesday, January 3, 1933
External Information about this EO
Mr. James W. Higgins, jr., may be appointed as Special Agent in the Internal Revenue Bureau of the Treasury Department without regard to the requirements of the civil-service rules.
Mr. Higgins has served in the excepted position of Deputy Collector of Internal Revenue since April 10, 1922, and in that capacity has gained knowledge and experience in regard to the investigation of which it is desired to use him as a Special Agent.
This order is recommended by the Secretary of the Treasury and is in the interest of the service.

## Notes
### See Related

* None Applicable
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse