OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume V/On the Merits and Forgiveness of Sins, and on the Baptism of Infants/Book I/Chapter 27

Chapter 27.—Infants Must Feed on Christ.
Will, however, any man be so bold as to say that this statement has no relation to infants, and that they can have life in them without partaking of His body and blood—on the ground that He does not say, Except one eat, but “Except ye eat;” as if He were addressing those who were able to hear and to understand, which of course infants cannot do? But he who says this is inattentive; because, unless all are embraced in the statement, that without the body and the blood of the Son of man men cannot have life, it is to no purpose that even the elder age is solicitous of it. For if you attend to the mere words, and not to the meaning, of the Lord as He speaks, this passage may very well seem to have been spoken merely to the people whom He happened at the moment to be addressing; because He does not say, Except one eat; but Except ye eat. What also becomes of the statement which He makes in the same context on this very point: “The bread that I will give is my flesh, for the life of the world?” For, it is according to this statement, that we find that sacrament pertains also to us, who were not in existence at the time the Lord spoke these words; for we cannot possibly say that we do not belong to “the world,” for the life of which Christ gave His flesh. Who indeed can doubt that in the term world all persons are indicated who enter the world by being born? For, as He says in another passage, “The children of this world beget and are begotten.” From all this it follows, that even for the life of infants was His flesh given, which He gave for the life of the world; and that even they will not have life if they eat not the flesh of the Son of man.

## Footnotes

* ↑ John vi. 51.
* ↑ Generant et generantur; Luke xx. 34.
# National Broadcasting Company v. United States (316 U.S. 447)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
316 U.S. 447
National Broadcasting Company v. United States
Argued: April 30 and May 1, 1942. --- Decided: June 1, 1942
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Messrs. John T. Cahill and David M. Wood, both of New York City, for appellants.
Mr. Telford Taylor, of Washington, D.C., for appellees.
Mr. Chief Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Board of Young Men's Christian Associations v. United States/Concurrence Stewart

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Stewart Harlan
* Dissenting Opinion Black
United States Supreme Court
395 U.S. 85
The NATIONAL BOARD OF YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONS et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.
Argued: March 3, 1969. --- Decided: May 19, 1969
Mr. Justice STEWART, concurring.
If United States military forces should use a building for their own purposes-as a defense bastion or command post, for example-it seems to me this would be a Fifth Amendment taking, even though the owner himself were not actually deprived of any personal use of the building. Since I do not understand the Court to hold otherwise, I join its judgment and opinion.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Board of Young Men's Christian Associations v. United States/Dissent Black

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Stewart Harlan
* Dissenting Opinion Black
United States Supreme Court
395 U.S. 85
The NATIONAL BOARD OF YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONS et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.
Argued: March 3, 1969. --- Decided: May 19, 1969
Mr. Justice BLACK, with whom Mr. Justice DOUGLAS joins, dissenting.
The Court says that: 'Shortly after midnight, Colonel Sachse moved his troops inside the three buildings (which included the two buildings for which compensation is here sought) so that the men might be better protected from the sniper fire.' Ante, at 87. The Army selected those two buildings to protect itself while carrying out its mission of safeguarding the entire zone from the rioters. Thus, the Army made the two buildings the particular targets of the rioters and the buildings suffered heavy damage. The Army's action was taken not to save the buildings but to use them as a shelter and fortress from which, as the Court of Claims found, 'tos eal off the border from further incursions by the rioters into the Atlantic portion of the Canal Zone.' 396 F.2d 467, 474, 184 Ct.Cl. 427, 438 (1968). At that time, I think it can hardly be said that these private buildings were taken for the good of the owners. Instead, the taking by the Army was for the benefit of the public generally. I still feel that 'the guiding principle should be this: Whenever the Government determines that one person's property-whatever it may be-is essential to the war effort and appropriates it for the common good, the public purse, rather than the individual, should bear the loss.' United States v. Caltex, Inc., 344 U.S. 149, 156, 73 S.Ct. 200, 204, 97 L.Ed. 157 (1952) (dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Douglas).

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Board of Young Men's Christian Associations v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinions

    Stewart
    Harlan

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
395 U.S. 85
The NATIONAL BOARD OF YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONS et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.
Argued: March 3, 1969. --- Decided: May 19, 1969
Ronald A. Jacks, Washington, D.C., for petitioners.
Peter L. Strauss, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Broadcasting Company v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "National Broadcasting Company v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* National Broadcasting Company v. United States (316 U.S. 447)
* National Broadcasting Company v. United States (319 U.S. 190)
# My Climbs in the Alps and Caucasus (1908)/Preface

PREFACE.
Fate decrees that the mountaineer should, sooner or later, fall a victim to the furor scribendi, and since it is useless for a mere mortal to contend with the gods, I have yielded to their behests. A fitting reward has been allotted me; though the delight of wandering among the great snow-fields, of climbing the jagged ridges, and of plunging down through the primeval forest of some Caucasian valley, cannot be rivalled by the rarest fabric built of memory, yet the piecing together of old incidents, the interweaving of the laughter and the fears, the desperate struggles and the wild triumph of old-won victories, has tinged many a winter evening with the gorgeous colouring of Alpine sunsets and has knitted more firmly the bonds of well-tried friendships; to some extent, even, it has brought me nearer to that reckless, lucky, tireless youth, when the grass slopes, and the stones, and the other ills of life, had not found the art of troubling.
I fear no contributions to science, or topography, ​or learning of any sort are to be found sandwiched in between the story of crags and séracs, of driving storm and perfect weather. To tell the truth, I have only the vaguest ideas about theodolites, and as for plane tables, their very name is an abomination. To those who think with me, who regard mountaineering as unmixed play, these pages are alone addressed. Should they, in some dim after-glow fashion, reflect the joy and frolic of sunshine holidays, their utmost mission will have been accomplished, and pride will mightily inflate their author.
My sincerest thanks are due to those friends who have so kindly placed drawings and photographs at my disposal; indeed, I feel that my debt to them is wholly beyond expression.
A. F. MUMMERY.
# My Cocoon tightens—Colors tease—

* "From the Chrysalis" in Poems (1890)
* "My cocoon tightens, colors tease" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# Modern Russian Poetry/Georgy Chulkov

Georgy Chulkov
(Born 1879)
Chulkov has versified in the strained mode current ten years ago, and has written novels that are diluted Dostoyevsky. He shared the latter's Siberian experiences, in fact, being exiled for participation in student disturbances. He early began to theorize about the necessity for a return to a more sober and realistic art enriched by the modernistic adventures.
# Modern Russian Poetry/In the White Land

Written in 1908, published in 1909.
IN THE WHITE LAND
The candid psalm of Silence rises whitely burning,
The icy wastes are lit with sunset's radiant yearning.
The drowsy elements in yawning vistas freeze,
And voiceless are the argent Polar liturgies.
Above the sea of whiteness, crimson curtains falling;
No fields or forests here, clear crystal shines appalling.
White altars stretch beneath the changeless icy skies,
A prayer, not suppliant, a psalm, not voiced,—arise.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Modern Russian Poetry/Igor Severyanin

Igor Severyanin
(Pseud. of Igor Lotarev)
The story goes that at the beginning of his poetic career Severyanin took his constitutional on the Nevsky Prospekt wearing a yellow shirtwaist, with green roses painted on his cheeks. He enjoys the distinction of having founded the ego-futurist group in Petrograd, which opposed the cubo-futurist group in Moscow. He later betrayed the coterie, but remained faithful to its canons of sound against sense. His insistence on neologisms and words created ex nihilo has produced a style which is becoming a poetic idiom. Yet a genuine musical quality saves some of his intolerably clownish and vacuous verse. His first book, "The Thunder-Seething Cup," was published in 1913 and ran into seven editions in two years, and he has now some ten volumes to his credit. His poetry recitals have diverted both Czarist and Bolshevist Russia.
# Modern Russian Poetry/In an Empty House

IN AN EMPTY HOUSE
From the walls the paper's blue is vanished,
The daguerreotypes, the ikons banished.
Only there the deepened blue appears
Where these hid it, hanging through the years.
From the heart the memory is perished,
Perished all that long ago it cherished!
Those remain, of whom death hides the face,
Leaving their yet unforgotten trace.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Modern Russian Poetry/Gratitude

GRATITUDE
For all, I thank Thee, I, the meek remitter:
For passion's secret torments without end,
The kiss of venom, and the tears too bitter,
The vengeful enemy, the slanderous friend,
The spirit's ardor on the desert squandered,
For every lash of life's deceiving thong;
I thank Thee for the wastes where I have wandered:
But heed Thou, that I need not thank Thee long.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Modern Russian Poetry/Inevitability

INEVITABILITY
If you kept faith, or not, does it avail?
If I was faithful or unfaithful to you?
Our eyes that would look elsewhere flinch and fail,
Yet not my will has power to undo you.
Once more I tremble, so once more you pale,
As the forebodings of old pain break through you.
The moments pour with noise of torrents streaming:
Above us passion's lifted blade is gleaming.
Whoever made us, lips and lit eyes drinking
Of lips and eyes, be it or God or Fate,
Is it not one? Within the circle shrinking
We stand to hear the spell reverberate!
We bend with happiness and fear,—and sinking,
We fall: two anchors on the sea-floor grate.
Fancy, nor chance, nor passion overpowers
Us, whom the ineluctable devours.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Modern Russian Poetry/Fyodor Tyutchev

Fyodor Tyutchev
(1803-1873)
Tyutchev was rediscovered by the moderns and hailed as the great fore-runner. They found in his mentality and sensibility, as well as in his technique, elements foreign to classic normalcy, and akin to their own anguished metaphysics and æsthetics. The two hundred short lyrics, which are all the original poetry he has left us, exhibit the organic coherence and ordered beauty which belong to fine lyric art. The originality of his poems consists in that both man's routine passions and nature's passionless routine are sensed in ultimate, cosmic terms.
Tyutchev's career could not be inferred from his poetry. This was the by-product of a long and largely conventional life. He was a sedate bureaucrat in the diplomatic service, a position which kept him in Muenchen, the German Athens, during his best years. He proved the happiness of his marriage to a Bavarian aristocrat by marrying again shortly after her death. When he was on the shady side of fifty his career was seriously injured by a liaison with his daughter's teacher. During the last twenty years of his life he acted as censor, a position for which his political views eminently fitted him. He believed in autocracy, and he prophesied that Orthodox Russia, at the head of the united Slavs, would be the sacred arc riding the waves of the western revolutionary deluge.
# Modern Russian Poetry/Index of Authors

Index of Authors
Akhmatova, Anna, 150-154
Balmont, Konstantin, 72-80
Baltrushaitis, Yurgis, 109-111
Baratynsky, Yevgeny, 13, 14
Bashkin, Vasily, 144, 145
Bely, Andrey, 138-141
Blok, Alexander, 126-137
Brusov, Valery, 81-91
Bunin, Ivan, 92-97
Chulkov, Georgy, 123-125
Foeth, see Shenshin-Foeth
Gorodetzky, Sergey, 146-149
Hippius, Zinaida, 68-71
Hofman, Victor, 142, 143
Ivanov, Vyacheslav, 98-108
Kluyev, Nikolai, 159-161
Koltzov, Alexey, 15, 16
Kuzmin, Mikhail, 118-128
Lermontov, Mikhail, 17-22
Maikov, Apollon, 39-42
Marienhof, Anatoly, 176-179
Merezhkovsky, Dmitry, 56-60
Minsky, N., 53-55
Nekrasov, Nikolai, 30-33
Oreshin, Piotr, 171-175
Polonsky, Yakov, 47-49
Pushkin, Alexander, 3-12
Severyanin, Igor, 155-158
Shenshin-Foeth, Afanasy, 43-46
Shishova, Z., 169, 170
Sologub, Fyodor, 61-67
Solovyov, Vladimir, 50-52
Stolitza, Lubov, 162, 163
Tolstoy, Alexey K., 34-38
Tyutchev, Fyodor, 23-29
Voloshin, Maximilian, 112-117
Yesenin, Sergei, 164-168
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume VI/Sermons/Sermon XXIX

Sermon XXIX.
[LXXIX. Ben.]
Again on the words of the Gospel, Matt. xvii., where Jesus showed Himself on the mount to His three disciples.
1. We heard when the Holy Gospel was being read of the great vision on the mount, in which Jesus showed Himself to the three disciples, Peter, James, and John. “His face did shine as the sun:” this is a figure of the shining of the Gospel. “His raiment was white as the snow:” this is a figure of the purity of the Church, to which it was said by the Prophet, “Though your sins be as scarlet, I will make them white as snow.” Elias and Moses were talking with Him; because the grace of the Gospel receives witness from the Law and the Prophets. The Law is represented in Moses, the Prophets in Elias; to speak briefly. For there are the mercies of God vouchsafed through a holy Martyr to be rehearsed. Let us give ear. Peter desired three tabernacles to be made, one for Moses, one for Elias, and one for Christ. The solitude of the mountain had charms for him; he had been wearied with the tumult of the world’s business. But why sought he three tabernacles, but because he knew not as yet the unity of the Law, and of Prophecy, and of the Gospel? Lastly, he was corrected by the cloud, “While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them.” Lo, the cloud hath made one tabernacle; wherefore didst thou seek for three? “And a voice came out of the cloud, This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased, hear ye Him.” Elias speaketh; but “hear Him;” “Moses speaketh; but “hear Him.” The Prophets speak, the Law speaketh; but “hear Him,” who is the voice of the Law, and the tongue of the Prophets. He spake in them, and when He vouchsafed so to do, He appeared in His own person. “Hear ye Him:” let us then hear Him. When the Gospel spake, think it was the cloud: from thence hath the voice sounded out to us. Let us hear Him; that is, let us do what He saith, let us hope for what He hath promised.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Matt. xvii. 2.
* ↑ Isa. i. 18.
* ↑ Matt. xvii. 5.
# National Education Policy (2020)/Chapter 25

25.1. Achieving successful implementation of this policy demands a long-term vision, availability of expertise on a sustained basis, and concerted action from all concerned encompassing National, State, institutional, and individual levels. In this context, the Policy recommends strengthening and empowering the Central Advisory Board of Education (CABE) which will have a much greater mandate and not only a forum for widespread consultation and examination of issues relating to educational and cultural development. The remodeled and rejuvenated CABE shall also be responsible for developing, articulating, evaluating, and revising the vision of education in the country on a continuous basis, in close collaboration with MHRD and the corresponding apex bodies of States. It shall also create and continuously review the institutional frameworks that shall help attain this vision.
25.2. To bring the focus back on education and learning, it is desirable that the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) be re-designated as the Ministry of Education (MoE).
# National Education Policy (2020)/Chapter 27

27.1. Any policy’s effectiveness depends on its implementation. Such implementation will require multiple initiatives and actions, which will have to be taken by multiple bodies in a synchronized and ​systematic manner. Therefore, the implementation of this Policy will be led by various bodies including MHRD, CABE, Union and State Governments, education-related Ministries, State Departments of Education, Boards, NTA, the regulatory bodies of school and higher education, NCERT, SCERTs, schools, and HEIs along with timelines and a plan for review, in order to ensure that the policy is implemented in its spirit and intent, through coherence in planning and synergy across all these bodies involved in education.
27.2. Implementation will be guided by the following principles. First, implementation of the spirit and intent of the Policy will be the most critical matter. Second, it is important to implement the policy initiatives in a phased manner, as each policy point has several steps, each of which requires the previous step to be implemented successfully. Third, prioritization will be important in ensuring optimal sequencing of policy points, and that the most critical and urgent actions are taken up first, thereby enabling a strong base. Fourth, comprehensiveness in implementation will be key; as this Policy is interconnected and holistic, only a full-fledged implementation, and not a piecemeal one, will ensure that the desired objectives are achieved. Fifth, since education is a concurrent subject, it will need careful planning, joint monitoring, and collaborative implementation between the Centre and States. Sixth, timely infusion of requisite resources—human, infrastructural, and financial—at the Central and State levels will be crucial for the satisfactory execution of the Policy. Finally, careful analysis and review of the linkages between multiple parallel implementation steps will be necessary in order to ensure effective dovetailing of all initiatives. This will also include early investment in some of the specific actions (such as the setting up of early childhood care and education infrastructure) that will be imperative to ensuring a strong base and a smooth progression for all subsequent programmes and actions.
27.3. Subject-wise implementation committees of experts in cooperation and consultation with other relevant Ministries will be set up at both the Central and State levels to develop detailed implementation plans for each aspect of this Policy in accordance with the above principles to achieve the goals of the Policy in a clear and phased manner. Yearly joint reviews of the progress of implementation of the policy, in accordance with the targets set for each action, will be conducted by designated teams constituted by MHRD and the States, and reviews will be shared with CABE. In the decade of 2030-40, the entire policy will be in an operational mode, following which another comprehensive review will be undertaken.
# National Geographic Magazine/Volume 31/Number 6/Our State Flowers/The Syringa

See also ... Main article • Index to our State flowers • List of illustrations

## Our State Flowers
### The Syringa (Philadelphus lewisii Pursh)

The queen of Idaho's wild flower garden is by unanimous acclaim the modest syringa, Philadelphus lewisii, which is limited in its territory to the western group of States, from Montana and Wyoming to Washington and California. Its flowers matching the orange blossom in beauty, its bursting buds appearing to be fairly pin-cushions, its fragrance as delightful as the odors that sweep over Elysian fields, its leaves a delicate, soft, shimmering green, the Idaho syringa is a shrub well equipped to awaken enthusiasm in every lover of flowers.
The syringa belongs to the saxifrage family, which has some 250 species scattered throughout the North Temperate world. It has many close relatives—various species of Philadelphus, which is the botanical name for all the species we in our common garden variety of nomenclature call the syringas. There is Philadelphus grandiflorus, which grows in the South Atlantic States and is famous for its rich and fragrant flowers; Philadelphus inodorus, with the same range, but without the same fragrance; Philadelphus hirsutus, dwelling in the North Carolina-Alabama mountains and arraying itself in hairy leaves; Philadelphus coronarius, the mock orange of the Eastern States and everywhere loved for its beautiful and wonderfully fragrant blossoms.
The syringas are unfortunate in their popular name. Ptolemy Philadelphus loved them and they became Philadelphus this or Philadelphus that. But the world at large wanted a name more to popular liking and by common consent they became syringas. Now that would be all right if it did not happen that syringa is the botanical name of the lilac, to which family the popularly named syringas bear no relation.
Source: —, ed. (June 1917), “Our State Flowers: The Floral Emblems Chosen by the Commonwealths”, The National Geographic Magazine 31(6): 490–491. (Illustration from page 505.)