OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Palestine Exploration Fund - Quarterly Statement for 1894/Dress

X.—Dress.
The dress of a Jew might not be of mixed material, and garments which entailed work to put on might not be worn abroad on the Sabbath. Women consequently might not go out with a gold crown representing Jerusalem—an adornment often mentioned (Sabbath, vi, 1; Edioth, ii, 7; Kelim, x, 2). The small girls wore plaited hair, and splinters in their ears to prepare for earrings. The Jewesses from Arabia wore veils, and a peculiar cloak distinguished those of Media (Sabbath, vi, 6). From the same passage we learn that the Jews used wooden legs and crutches, with various amulets (Sabbath, vi, 8, 9). The women also painted the eyes with Kohl (viii, 3). The sword, bow, shield, sling and lance were forbidden on the Sabbath. Anklets were worn and false hair and false teeth (Sabbath, vi, 4, 5); laces and fillets, necklaces, nose-rings, seal-rings, sandals, mail coats, greaves, and helmets, scent boxes and musk bottles, are noticed in the same passage (Sabbath, vi, 1, 2, 3).
In another tract occur several notices of dress (Kelim, xi, 8, xxiii, 2, xxvi, 1, xxviii, 5) and of arms, such as the helmet, lance, shield, and breastplate, with women's ornaments, the fibula, earrings, rings, nose-ring, chains, gems, pearls, and glass (apparently false jewels). The people of Ascalon wore a peculiar belt, and the Jewish girls wore their hair in nets. Sandals or overshoes for muddy weather, and a peculiar sandal made at Latakia, are noticed, with women's caps and Arab veils. Smelling bottles seem to have been much used (Kethubim, vi, 4) as well as signet-rings, earrings, &c. (Sotah, i, 6; Nedarim, iv, 1). Clothing included sheepskins (Nedarim, vii, 3) and woollen stuff and Galilean linen (Baba Kama, x, 9). Coral (almug) was worn in rings (Kelim, xiii, 6), and amulets are said to have contained either writings or magic roots (Mikvaoth, x, 2). The wearing of amulets was an universal custom, as it still is in the East, and in a great part of Europe, among all nations.
# Palestine Exploration Fund - Quarterly Statement for 1894/Errata and a Correction

ERRATA.
October "Quarterly Statement."
Under CANADA : —
For Hayne, George, read Hague, George.
A CORRECTION.
By W. H. D. Rouse, Esq., M.A.
Allow me to point out a slip which has crept into the last Quarterly Statement, p. 203. χρηστῂ Χαἷρε nothing to do with the word Christ, but is one of the commonest sepulchral formulæ in Greek ("Good friend, farewell"). No doubt the same is true of χρεστέ, on p. 201, but the whole inscription is not given.
# Palestine Exploration Fund - Quarterly Statement for 1894/Government

I.—Government.
The government of the country under the Legate, with various local officials, assisted by Roman legions and by native auxiliaries, was in the hands of foreigners. Soldiers from Italy, Gaul, Saxony, Greece, Africa, and Asia Minor, mingled with corps of Arabs on dromedaries, guarded the frontiers, and were quartered in the towns. They have left many memorials, especially in Bashan, where the tombstones of Roman officers are numerous; and the local councils often erected memorial tablets, which speak enthusiastically of the goodness of their rulers, and attest their fealty to the Cæsars.
Under these rulers the population included the עם הארץ or "country folk," apparently Jews, together with pagans of Aramean and Arab origin; and an upper native class who understood Greek. There were scattered communities of Christians, living very humbly, and some of whom—Marcionites, Markosians, Ebionites, and, later on, Manicheans—were heretics; while some—like Justin Martyr's congregation at Shechem—held a purer faith, and were recruited from among Samaritans, Jews, and Greeks alike. The Jews were allowed freedom of religion, and a Sanhedrin, which was permitted to rule them in religious matters, but sternly repressed when it attempted political action, or roused rebellions like that of Rabbi Akiba at Bether. As subjects the Jews seem to have enjoyed equal rights with others, and were not only prosperous in trade, but also owned houses and lands, and became rich. Their power in Rome ​itself, after the unsuccessful attempt of Claudius to banish them, greatly increased, especially in the times of the Agrippas, before the fall of Jerusalem, and under the Syrian Emperors Elagabalus and Philip the Arab. They do not appear to have held government posts, though some were enlisted in the army (Tebul Yom, iv, 5). Their relations with the other elements of the population will be considered later.
The Jewish colony at Palmyra prospered under the native princes. In the third century Queen Zenobia is called Yedithah on some Palmyrene texts, which apparently means "Jewess." She was not really of Jewish birth, though she may have favoured the Jews as she favoured the Christians. She is not mentioned in the Mishnah, which shows that late additions were not allowed to corrupt its text.
The Sanhedrin which finally settled at Tiberias (T. B. Rosh hash Shanah, 51 h) appears to have been undisturbed till Constantine renewed the edicts of Hadrian against the Jews (T. B. Sanhed, 12 a). In the Mishnah there is little which would lead us to suppose that the persecution of the Jews continued after Hadrian's time until the establishment of Christianity. There is much on the contrary to prove peaceful intercourse with the non-Jewish population.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume IX/John of Damascus/An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith/Book I
## Contents

* Chapter 1
* Chapter 2
* Chapter 3
* Chapter 4
* Chapter 5
* Chapter 6
* Chapter 7
* Chapter 8
* Chapter 9
* Chapter 10
* Chapter 11
* Chapter 12
* Chapter 13
* Chapter 14
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume IX/John of Damascus/An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith/Book I/Chapter 10

Chapter X.—Concerning divine union and separation.
Therefore all these names must be understood as common to deity as a whole, and as containing the notions of sameness and simplicity and indivisibility and union: while the names Father, Son and Spirit, and causeless and caused, and unbegotten and begotten, and procession contain the idea of separation: for these terms do not explain His essence, but the mutual relationship and manner of existence.
When, then, we have perceived these things and are conducted from these to the divine essence, we do not apprehend the essence itself but only the attributes of the essence: just as we have not apprehended the essence of the soul even when we have learnt that it is incorporeal and without magnitude and form: nor again, the essence of the body when we know that it is white or black, but only the attributes of the essence. Further, the true doctrine teacheth that the Deity is simple and has one simple energy, good and energising in all things, just as the sun’s ray, which warms all things and energises in each in harmony with its natural aptitude and receptive power, having obtained this form of energy from God, its Maker.
But quite distinct is all that pertains to the divine and benignant incarnation of the divine Word. For in that neither the Father nor the Spirit have any part at all, unless so far as regards approval and the working of inexplicable miracles which the God-Word, having become man like us, worked, as unchangeable God and son of God.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Greg. Naz., Orat. 45; cf. also Epist. ad. Evagr., and Greg. Nyss., Epist. ad Ablab.; Dionys., De div. nom., c. 2; Basil, Epist. 43 ad Greg. fratr.
* ↑ Dionys., De div. nom., c. 2; Greg. Naz., Orat. 37 and 45; Nyss. Epist. ad. Ablab.
* ↑ ὁ δὲ ἀληθὴς λόγος.
* ↑ Text, ἄνθρωπος, which is absent in some codices and in Dionys., De div. nom., from which these words are taken.
* ↑ Greg. Naz., Orat. 24: Dionys., De div. nom., c. 2.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume IX/John of Damascus/An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith/Book I/Chapter 14

Chapter XIV.—The properties of the divine nature.
Uncreate, without beginning, immortal, infinite, eternal, immaterial, good, creative, just, enlightening, immutable, passionless, uncircumscribed, immeasurable, unlimited, undefined, unseen, unthinkable, wanting in nothing, being His own rule and authority, all-ruling, life-giving, omnipotent, of infinite power, containing and maintaining the universe and making provision for all: all these and such like attributes the Deity possesses by nature, not having received them from elsewhere, but Himself imparting all good to His own creations according to the capacity of each.
The subsistences dwell and are established firmly in one another. For they are inseparable and cannot part from one another, but keep to their separate courses within one another, without coalescing or mingling, but cleaving to each other. For the Son is in the Father and the Spirit: and the Spirit in the Father and the Son: and the Father in the Son and the Spirit, but there is no coalescence or commingling or confusion. And there is one and the same motion: for there is one impulse and one motion of the three subsistences, which is not to be observed in any created nature.
Further the divine effulgence and energy, being one and simple and indivisible, assuming many varied forms in its goodness among what is divisible and allotting to each the component parts of its own nature, still remains simple and is multiplied without division among the divided, and gathers and converts the divided into its own simplicity. For all things long after it and have their existence in it. It gives also to all things being according to their several natures, and it is itself the being of existing things, the life of living things, the reason of rational beings, the thought of thinking beings. But it is itself above mind and reason and life and essence.
Further the divine nature has the property of penetrating all things without mixing with them and of being itself impenetrable by anything else. Moreover, there is the property of knowing all things with a simple knowledge and of seeing all things, simply with His divine, all-surveying, immaterial eye, both the things of the present, and the things of the past, and the things of the future, before they come into being. It is also sinless, and can cast sin out, and bring salvation: and all that it wills, it can accomplish, but does not will all it could accomplish. For it could destroy the universe but it does not will so to do.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Text, τὸ ἄ& 203·λον: in one codex there is added as emendation or explanation, τὸ ἁπλοῦν, τὸ ἀσύνθετον.
* ↑ Greg. Naz., Orat. 1, 13 and 40.
* ↑ Dionys., De div. nom., c. 5.
* ↑ Text, καθὼς ἔχει φύσεως: in the margin of the manuscript is ὡς ἔχουσι.
* ↑ Dan. ii. 22.
* ↑ Greg., Orat. 40.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume IX/John of Damascus/An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith/Book I/Chapter 1

An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith.
Book I.
Chapter I.—That the Deity is incomprehensible, and that we ought not to pry into and meddle with the things which have not been delivered to us by the holy Prophets, and Apostles, and Evangelists.
No one hath seen God at any time; the Only-begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, He hath declared Him. The Deity, therefore, is ineffable and incomprehensible. For no one knoweth the Father, save the Son, nor the Son, save the Father. And the Holy Spirit, too, so knows the things of God as the spirit of the man knows the things that are in him. Moreover, after the first and blessed nature no one, not of men only, but even of supramundane powers, and the Cherubim, I say, and Seraphim themselves, has ever known God, save he to whom He revealed Himself.
God, however, did not leave us in absolute ignorance. For the knowledge of God’s existence has been implanted by Him in all by nature. This creation, too, and its maintenance, and its government, proclaim the majesty of the Divine nature. Moreover, by the Law and the Prophets in former times and afterwards by His Only-begotten Son, our Lord and God and Saviour Jesus Christ, He disclosed to us the knowledge of Himself as that was possible for us. All things, therefore, that have been delivered to us by Law and Prophets and Apostles and Evangelists we receive, and know, and honour, seeking for nothing beyond these. For God, being good, is the cause of all good, subject neither to envy nor to any passion. For envy is far removed from the Divine nature, which is both passionless and only good. As knowing all things, therefore, and providing for what is profitable for each, He revealed that which it was to our profit to know; but what we were unable to bear He kept secret. With these things let us be satisfied, and let us abide by them, not removing everlasting boundaries, nor overpassing the divine tradition.

## Footnotes

* ↑ St. John i. 18 (R.V.).
* ↑ St. Matt. xi. 27.
* ↑ 1 Cor. ii. 11.
* ↑ Wisd. xiii. 5.
* ↑ Greg. Naz., Orat. 34.
* ↑ Dionys., De div. nom., c. 1.
* ↑ Greg. Naz., Orat. 34.
* ↑ Reading ὃπερ δε οὐκ ἐδυνάμεθα for ὃπερ δὲ οὖν ἐδυνάμεθα. Cod. Reg. 3379 gives καὶ ὃ οὐ δυνάμεθα.
* ↑ Prov. xxii. 28.
# Oh! Christina!

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Commons category, Wikidata item.
"Oh! Christina!" is quite as amusing as was his "Wee Macgreegor," but with a quaint, bristling, slangy, good-hearted little girl as the exponent of Glasga' humor, instead of a laddie. The book may be read in an hour, and that hour at least will be one of jollity. —The Outlook, 1 May 1909. [Full review(s) may be read on the Discussion page.]
"Mind yer nut, auntie!" she added; "I'm gaun to drap this yin."
A large empty cardboard box fell at the spinster's feet.
"Christina, I cannot allow you to address me in that disrespectful fashion!" Miss Purvis cried indignantly. "Mind my nut, indeed! What do you mean by it?"
OH! CHRISTINA!
OH! CHRISTINA!
BY
J. J. BELL Author of "Whither Thou Goest," "Wee Macgreegor," etc.
New York Chicago Toronto Fleming H. Revell Company London and Edinburgh
Copyright, 1909, by FLEMING H. REVELL COMPANY
New York: 158 Fifth Avenue Chicago: 80 Wabash Avenue Toronto: 25 Richmond St., W. London: 21 Paternoster Square Edinburgh: 100 Princes Street
TO
MY SISTERS
SUSIE AND SARA

### CONTENTS

* page
* I. The Incorrigible 9
* II. The Geography Lesson 19
* III. A Zealous Apprentice 26
* IV. In Full Charge 36
* V. "With Baldyin's Regairds" 44
* VI. A Doctor's Assistant 54
* VII. The Grammar Lesson 65
* VIII. The Inventory 72
* IX. The Cheap Sale 79
* X. "Ower Auld for True Love" 86
* XI. The Gum That Stuck 96
* XII. "Backward in Coming Forward" 106
* XIII. The Magic Potion 117
* XIV. The Compact 128
* XV. The Moonlight Cruise 138
* XVI. Miss Purvis's Romance 149
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1934, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 89 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pea v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
378 U.S. 571
Pea v. United States
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774.
Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice CLARK, Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pea v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
378 U.S. 571
Pea v. United States
Henry Lincoln Johnson, Jr., for petitioner.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Jerome Nelson, for the United States.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Peabody v. United States (231 U.S. 530)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
231 U.S. 530
Peabody v. United States (231 U.S. 530)
Argued: February 27, 1913. --- Decided: December 15, 1913
Death of Mary R. Peabody, one of the appellants herein, suggested, and appearance of Amory Eliot filed and entered February 24, 1913, as a party appellant herein.
Messrs. John Lowell, William Frye White, and Chauncey Hackett for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 531-534 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Frederick De C. Faust and Assistant Attorney General Thompson for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from page 534 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Peabody v. Eisner

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
247 U.S. 347
Peabody v. Eisner
Argued: March 4, 5, and 6, 1918. --- Decided: June 3, 1918
Mr. Henry W. Clark, of New York City, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Solicitor General Davis, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice PITNEY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Peabody v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Peabody v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Peabody v. United States (175 U.S. 546)
* Peabody v. United States (231 U.S. 530)
# Peabody v. United States (175 U.S. 546)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
175 U.S. 546
Peabody v. United States
Argued: October 17, 1899. --- Decided: December 22, 1899
Mr. Frank W. Clancy for appellant.
Mr. Matthew G. Reynolds and Solicitor General Richards for appellee.
Mr. Justice Peckham delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 11/Yapahoo - Part 1

Part 2→
​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/240 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/241 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/242 ​ruined cities of Coylon. As, however, I do not think they are so well known in England, I give a detailed drawing of this curious myth. It is also of one block of stone, and measures five feet by four.
This creature is called in Tamil, Yanci-Yali, which has the same signification, viz., "Elephant-Lion," and is one of the vehicles of Durga, a form of the goddess Parvati, who, in consequence, is called "Yali Yurthi," she who rides on a Yali.
These completed the balustrade, and we now come to the terrace I have mentioned. Its height above the lion pedestal may be some fifty or sixty feet.
# One of a Thousand/Q

* Qua, Francis Winnie
* Quint, Alonzo Hall
# One of a Thousand/K

* Keene, Walter Scott
* Keith, George E.
* Keith, Isaac Newton
* Keith, Lafayette
* Keith, Monroe
* Keith, Preston Bond
* Keith, Ziba C.
* Kellogg, John Edward
* kendall, Edward
* Kendricken, Paul Henry
* Kennedy, Donald
* Kenrick, John
* Kent, Daniel
* Kimball, John Francis
* Kimball, William Washington
* King, George
* King, James Putnam
* Kingman, Hosea
* Kingsbury, Albert Dexter
* Kingsley, Chester Ward
* Kinsley, Edward Wilkinson
* Kittredge, Charles James
* Knight, Horatio Gates
* Knowlton, Marcus P.
# One of a Thousand/L

* Ladd, Charles R.
* Laforme, Vincent
* Lambert, Thomas Ricker
* Lambert, William Henry
* Lane, Saurin Eliot
* Lang, Benjamin Johnson
* Larrabee, John
* Lasker, Raphael
* Lathrop, John
* Lavallee, Calixa
* Lawrence, Asa S.
* Lawrence, Samuel Crocker
* Leach, George Carroll
* Leach, Giles Luther
* Leach, James Cushing
* Lee, Andrew
* Leighton, John William
* Leighton, Nicholas Winfield Scott
* Leland, Luther Erving
* Leonard, Spencer
* Lewis, Charles Dudley
* Lewis, John Jay
* Lilley, Charles Sumner
* Lilly, Alfred Theodore
* Lincoln, Frederic Walker
* Lincoln, Leontine
* Listemann, Bernhard Friedrich Wilhelm
* Litchfield, George Allen
* Little, Samuel
* Locke, Warren Edgar
* Lodge, Henry Cabot
* Lombard, Nathan C.
* Long, John Davis
* Loring, George Bailey
* Lothrop, Daniel
* Lovell, Benjamin S.
* Lovell, Clarence P.
* Lovering, Henry Bacon
* Lovering, Joseph
* Lowell, James Russell
* Lowell, John
* Lyman, Edward E.
* Lyman, Robert Worthington