OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Cook v. Moffat/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
46 U.S. 295
Cook v. Moffat
THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland.
Cook was a citizen of Maryland, and Moffat and Curtis were citizens of New York.
It was an action brought, in July, 1835, by Moffat and Curtis against Cook, upon the common money counts. Cook confessed judgment, subject to the opinion of the court upon the following case stated, namely:--
In Circuit Court of the United States, Fourth Circuit, District of Maryland.
John L. Moffat and Joseph Curtis, surviving partners of Jonathan Wilmarth, v. William G. Cook.
Statement of Facts. John L. Moffat, Joseph Curtis, and Jonathan Wilmarth (the last of whom is now deceased) were citizens of the State of New York and resident there, and partners trading under the name and firm of Wilmarth, Moffat, & Curtis, and the defendant was a citizen and resident of Maryland during the times when the contracts and transactions upon which this suit is founded, or which constitutes the causes of this action, were entered into and had and made between the said firm and said Cook.
That the course of dealing was, that Cook, the defendant, used to write to said firm, ordering such articles or goods as he wanted, and they, said firm, sent them to him, and charged the goods in their books. In order to settle the account current from time to time, Cook sent to the said firm (usually by mail, sometimes, perhaps, otherwise) his note at six months, and these notes averaged $500 per month, and were punctually paid, for a time, in Baltimore. Cook at length became embarrassed, and wanted extensions, until he stopped payment entirely; being then indebted to said firm, on book account, $2,104
And owing 1 note, due 4th April, 1832, for 500
And owing 1 note, due 14th May, 1832, for 500
And owing 1 note, (do not know exactly when due), 416
And owing 1 note, due 2d June, 1832, for 500
And owing 1 note, due 30th June, 1832, for 500
And owing 1 note, due 1st July, 1832, for 800
And owing 1 note, due 13th August,1832, for 500
And owing 1 note, due 24th September, 1932, for 500
The above notes were remitted by Mr. Cook to said firm previously to March, 1832, when he stopped payment. On the 7th June following, his New York creditors generally agreed to give him time to pay, and the said firm of Wilmarth, Moffat, & Curtis, about that time, by arrangement made with Mr. Disosway, Cook's attorney in New York, gave time, and took Cook's three notes, drawn payable to the said firm, for the sums following, all dated 12th May, 1832, as the respective time as follows, viz.:--
One, 12 months after date, for........... $2,107
One, 15 months after date, for........... $2,107
One, 18 months after date, for........... $2,107

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cook v. Moffat

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
46 U.S. 295
Cook v. Moffat

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cook v. Lillo

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
103 U.S. 792
Cook v. Lillo
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Charles B. Singleton, Mr. Richard H. Browne, and Mr. John A. Campbell for the appellant.
Mr. C. E. Schmidt and Mr. Thomas J. Semmes, contra.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cowie's Printer's Pocket-Book and Manual

COWIE'S
PRINTERS' POCKET-BOOK AND M A N U A L.
Fourth Edition
TWO SHILLINGS AND SIXPENCE.
COWIE'S PRINTER'S POCKET-BOOK AND MANUAL,
CONTAINING
THE COMPOSITORS' AND PRESSMEN'S SCALE OF PRICES,
AGREED UPON IN 1810 AND MODIFIED IN 1816:
THE NEWSMEN'S SCALE,
NUMEROUS VALUABLE TABLES;
ALL THE SCHEMES OF IMPOSITIONS FROM FOLIO TO HUNDRED AND TWENTY-EIGHTS INCLUSIVE:
THE HEBREW, GREEK, AND SAXON ALPHABETS; WITH
PLANS OF THE RESPECTIVE CASES ;
AN EXPLANATION OF MATHEMATICAL, ALGEBRAICAL,
PHYSICAL, AND ASTRONOMICAL SIGNS.
TO WHICH IS ADDED
A TABLE FOR GIVING OUT PAPER,
AND
AN USEFUL ABSTRACT OF THE VARIOUS ACTS OF PARLIAMENT CONNECTED WITH THE TRADE.
ALSO,
A LIST OF MASTER PRINTERS, ARRANGED ON A NEW PLAN, AND CORRECTED TO THE PRESENT TIME.
LONDON: W. STRANGE, 21, PATERNOSTER ROW,
Price 2s 6d.
CONTENTS.
| | PAGE. |
| Situation and Arrangement of a Printing Office | 1 |
| Rules and Regulations to be observed in a Printing Office | 3 |
| Compositors' Scale of Prices | 6 |
| Resolutions respecting Periodical publications | 10 |
| Table shewing the price of any number of letters from 16,000 to 100,000 | 11 |
| Abstract of Compositors' Scale | 12 |
| Table shewing the price of any number of letters | 13 |
| Table shewing the price of any number of letters | 14 |
| Abstract of Newsmen's Scale | 16 |
| Of casting off copy | 17 |
| Plan of Compositors' Check Book | 22 |
| Companionships | 23 |
| Compositors' Scale for Imposition | 26 |
| Table of Signatures and Folios | 30 |
| Schemes of Impositions | 31–60 |
| Table shewing the number or thousands in a sheet of Eighteens, Twelves, Octavo, and Quarto, of various Sizes | 61 |
| Mathematical | 65 |
| Celestial and Astronomical Signs | 67 |
| Physical Signs and Abbreviations | 68 |
| Hebrew Alphabet | 69 |
| Greek and Saxon Alphabets | 70 |
| Plan of a common Hebrew case | 71 |
| ——of a Hebrew upper and lower case | 72, 73 |
| ——of a Greek upper and lower case | 74, 75 |
| Common upper and lower-case | 76, 77 |
| Improved Fount cases | 78, 79 |
| Pressmen's Scale | 80 |
| Table shewing the price of any number or Tokens from One to Twenty | 82 |
| Plan of a Press Book | 83 |
| Plan of a Book for checking Compositors' and Pressmen's Bills | 84 |
| Plan of a Job Book | 85 |
| Warehouse Book | 86 |
| Table shewing the quantity or paper to be given out for any job from 25 to 5,000 | 87 |
| Abstract of Acts or Parliament | 88 |
| List of Master Printers | 94 |
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cowie's Printer's Pocket-Book and Manual/A Table shewing the price of any number of letters, from 16,000 to 101,000, at 5d. per thousand

A Table shewing the price of any number of letters, from 16,000 to 101,000, at 5d. per thousand.
| Th | s. | d. | Th | s. | d. | Th | s. | d. | Th | s. | d. | Th | s. | d. |
| 17 | 7 | 1 | 34 | 14 | 2 | 51 | 21 | 3 | 68 | 28 | 4 | 85 | 35 | 5 |
| 18 | 7 | 6 | 35 | 14 | 7 | 52 | 21 | 8 | 69 | 28 | 9 | 86 | 35 | 10 |
| 19 | 7 | 11 | 36 | 15 | 0 | 53 | 22 | 1 | 70 | 29 | 2 | 87 | 36 | 3 |
| 20 | 8 | 4 | 37 | 15 | 5 | 54 | 22 | 6 | 71 | 29 | 7 | 88 | 36 | 8 |
| 21 | 8 | 9 | 38 | 15 | 10 | 55 | 22 | 11 | 72 | 30 | 0 | 89 | 37 | 1 |
| 22 | 9 | 2 | 39 | 16 | 3 | 56 | 23 | 4 | 73 | 30 | 5 | 90 | 37 | 6 |
| 23 | 9 | 7 | 40 | 16 | 8 | 57 | 23 | 9 | 74 | 30 | 10 | 91 | 37 | 11 |
| 24 | 10 | 0 | 41 | 17 | 1 | 58 | 24 | 2 | 75 | 31 | 3 | 92 | 38 | 4 |
| 25 | 10 | 5 | 42 | 17 | 6 | 59 | 24 | 7 | 76 | 31 | 8 | 93 | 38 | 9 |
| 26 | 10 | 10 | 43 | 17 | 11 | 60 | 25 | 0 | 77 | 32 | 1 | 94 | 39 | 2 |
| 27 | 11 | 3 | 44 | 18 | 4 | 61 | 25 | 5 | 78 | 32 | 6 | 95 | 39 | 7 |
| 28 | 11 | 8 | 45 | 18 | 9 | 62 | 25 | 10 | 79 | 32 | 11 | 96 | 40 | 0 |
| 29 | 12 | 1 | 46 | 19 | 2 | 63 | 26 | 3 | 80 | 33 | 4 | 97 | 40 | 5 |
| 30 | 12 | 6 | 47 | 19 | 7 | 64 | 26 | 8 | 81 | 33 | 9 | 98 | 40 | 10 |
| 31 | 12 | 11 | 48 | 20 | 0 | 65 | 27 | 1 | 82 | 34 | 2 | 99 | 41 | 3 |
| 32 | 13 | 4 | 49 | 20 | 5 | 66 | 27 | 6 | 83 | 34 | 7 | 100 | 41 | 8 |
| 33 | 13 | 9 | 50 | 20 | 10 | 67 | 27 | 11 | 84 | 35 | 0 | 101 | 42 | 1 |
# Cowie's Printer's Pocket-Book and Manual/A common Hebrew case

A COMMON HEBREW CASE.
# Cowie's Printer's Pocket-Book and Manual/A Table shewing the quantity or paper to be given out for any job, from 25 to 5,000

A TABLE SHOWING THE QUANTITY OF PAPER TO BE GIVEN OUT FOR ANY JOB, FROM 25 TO 5000.
| No. | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 12 | 12 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 16 | 18 | 18 | 20 | 20 | 21 | 21 |
| No. | q. | s. | q. | s. | q. | s. | q. | s. | q. | s. | q. | s. | q. | s. | q. | s. | q. | s. | q. | s. | q. | s. |
| 25 | | 15 | | 8 | | 5 | | 4 | | 3 | | 2½ | | 2 | | 2 | | 2 | | 1½ | | 1½ |
| 50 | 1 | 4 | | 14 | | 9 | | 7 | | 6 | | 5 | | 4 | | 3½ | | 3 | | 3 | | 2½ |
| 75 | 1 | 16 | | 20 | | 14 | | 10 | | 9 | | 7 | | 5½ | | 5 | | 4½ | | 4 | | 3½ |
| 100 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | | 18 | | 13 | | 12 | | 9 | | 7 | | 7 | | 6 | | 5½ | | 4½ |
| 150 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 1 | | 19 | | 18 | | 13 | | 11 | | 10 | | 9 | | 8 | | 7 |
| 200 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | 18 | | 14 | | 13 | | 12 | | 10½ | | 9 |
| 250 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 14 | 1 | 18 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 5 | | 22 | | 18 | | 17 | | 15 | | 13 | | 11 |
| 300 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 1 | | 21 | | 20 | | 17 | | 15½ | | 13 |
| 350 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | | 23 | | 20 | | 18 | | 15 |
| 400 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | | 23 | | 20½ | | 17 |
| 450 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | | 23 | | 19 |
| 500 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 2 | 14 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 18 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | | 21½ |
| 1000 | 20 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 19 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 18 | 2 | 6½ | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 17½ |
| 2000 | 40 | 6 | 20 | 4 | 13 | 11 | 10 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 18 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 4 | 0½ | 3 | 9 |
| 3000 | 60 | 6 | 30 | 5 | 20 | 3 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 13 | 6 | 17½ | 6 | 0¾ | 5 | 1 |
| 4000 | 80 | 7 | 40 | 5 | 26 | 19 | 20 | 2 | 17 | 22 | 13 | 11 | 10 | 18 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 23 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 7½ |
| 5000 | 100 | 7 | 50 | 5 | 33 | 12 | 25 | 3 | 22 | 8 | 16 | 20 | 13 | 10 | 12 | 14 | 11 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
# Cowgill v. California

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 371
Cowgill v. California
Melville B. Nimmer and Laurence R. Sperber, for appellant.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Evelle J. Younger, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cowgill v. California/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 371
Cowgill v. California
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, with whom Mr. Justice BRENNAN joins, concurring.
While I am of the view this appeal should be dismissed, I deem it appropriate to explain the basis for my conclusion since the issue tendered by appellant-whether symbolic expression by displaying a 'mutilated' American flag is protected from punishment by the Fourteenth Amendment-is one that I cannot regard as insubstantial. See Street v. New York, 394 U.S. 576, 594, 89 S.Ct. 1354, 22 L.Ed.2d 572 (1969).
The record before us is not in my judgment suitable for considering this broad question as it does not adequately flush the narrower and predicate issue of whether there is a recognizable communicative aspect to appellant's conduct which appears to have consisted merely of wearing a vest fashioned out of a cutup American flag. Such a question, not insubstantial of itself, has been pretermitted in the Court's previous socalled 'symbolic speech' cases where the communicative content of the conduct was beyond dispute. See Tinker v. Des Moines School District, 393 U.S. 503, 89 S.Ct. 733, 21 L.Ed.2d 731 (1969); Gregory v. City of Chicago, 394 U.S. 111, 89 S.Ct. 946, 22 L.Ed.2d 134 (1969); Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131, 86 S.Ct. 719, 15 L.Ed.2d 637 (1966); Bell v. Maryland, 378 U.S. 226, 84 S.Ct. 1814, 12 L.Ed.2d 822 (1964); Garner v. Louisiana, 368 U.S. 157, 201, 82 S.Ct. 248, 7 L.Ed.2d 207 (concurring in judgment) (1961); West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 632, 63 S.Ct. 1178, 87 L.Ed. 1628 (1943); see generally Note, Symbolic Conduct, 68 Col.L.Rev. 1091 (1968). The Court has, as yet, not established a test for determining at what point conduct becomes so intertwined with expression that it becomes necessary to weigh the State's interest in proscribing conduct against the constitutionally protected interest in freedom of expression.
While appellant contends that his conduct conveyed a symbolic message, the stipulated statement of facts on which this case comes to us suggests that the issue was not, in the first instance, determined as a factual matter by the trial court. Further, there is no indication that appellant either presented evidence on this question at trial or urged any standard at trial for determining that issue. I would therefore dismiss this appeal based on the inadequacy of the record for deciding the question presented. Rescue Army v. Municipal Court, 331 U.S. 549, 67 S.Ct. 1409, 91 L.Ed. 1666; DeBacker v. Brainerd, 90 S.Ct. 163.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cowie's Printer's Pocket-Book and Manual/Abstract of Compositors' Scale

abstract of the compositors' scale. :
| | | | | COMMON | FOREIGN | DICTIONARIES | DICTIONARIES | GRAMMARS, ETC. | GRAMMARS, ETC. | GREEK | GREEK |
| | | | | COMMON | FOREIGN | English. | 2 Lang. or Foreign. | English. | 2 Lang. or Foreign. | Without Accents. | With Accents. |
| | | | | d. | d. | d. | d. | d. | d. | d. | d. |
| English to Brevier | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$$\scriptstyle {\left\{{\begin{matrix}\ \end{matrix}}\right.}$ | leaded solid | | 5¾ 6 | 6¼ 6½ | 6¼ 6½ | 6½ 6¾ | 6 6¼ | 6¼ 6½ | 8½ 8¾ | 10 10¼ |
| Minion | $\scriptstyle {\left\{{\begin{matrix}\ \end{matrix}}\right.}$ | leaded solid | | 6 6¼ | 6¾ 7 | 6¾ 7 | 7 7¼ | | | | |
| Nonpareil | $\scriptstyle {\left\{{\begin{matrix}\ \end{matrix}}\right.}$ | leaded solid | | 6¾ 7 | 7½ 7¾ | 7½ 7¾ | 7¾ 8 | | | | |
| Pearl | $\scriptstyle {\left\{{\begin{matrix}\ \end{matrix}}\right.}$ | leaded or solid | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | 8 | 8¾ | 8¾ | 9 | | | | |
| Notes constituting the Charge of One Shilling ⅌ Sheet.—See Article 11. ||||||||||||
| Quarto and Octavo—20 Lines, or 2 Notes, though not amounting to 20 Lines—and not exceeding 4 Pages in 10 Sheets. ||||||||||||
| Twelves—1 Page, or 2 Notes, though not amounting to 1 Page—and not exceeding 6 Pages in 10 Sheets. ||||||||||||
| Eighteens or above—2 Pages, or 2 Notes, though not amounting to 2 Pages—and not exceeding 8 Pages in 10 Sheets. ||||||||||||
| Pamphlets—10 Lines, or 2 Notes, though not amounting to 10 Lines—and not exceeding 2 Pages in 5 Sheets. ||||||||||||
# County of Tipton v. Locomotive Works

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
103 U.S. 523
County of Tipton v. Locomotive Works
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. George Gantt for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. William Y. C. Humes, Mr. Henry T. Ellett, and Mr. Stanley Matthews for the defendant in error.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# County of Washington v. Sallinger

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
119 U.S. 176
County of Washington v. Sallinger
C. M. Busbee, for plaintiff in error.
J. W. Hinsdale and S. F. Phillips, for defendants in error.
MATTHEWS, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# County of Wilson v. National Bank

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
103 U.S. 770
County of Wilson v. National Bank
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Middle District of Tennessee.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Joseph S. Fowler for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. R. McPhail Smith, contra.
MR. JUSTICE WOODS delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Climatic Cycles and Tree-Growth/Appendix

APPENDIX.
TABLES OF MEAN TREE-GROWTH, BY GROUPS.
The tables give the mean growth of the group for each year in millimeters. The decade number in the left column applies to the growth in the adjacent column, and the succeeding 9 years follow along the horizontal line.
Note.—The dates in table 4 on page 45 should be altered by one year to agree with those in table 5 on page 52.
# Climatic Cycles and Tree-Growth

See the scan index for this work.
CLIMATIC CYCLES AND TREE-GROWTH
A STUDY OF THE ANNUAL RINGS OF TREES IN
RELATION TO CLIMATE AND SOLAR ACTIVITY
BY
A. E. DOUGLASS
Director of Steward Observatory, University of Arizona
Published by the Carnegie Institution of Washington
Washington, 1919
CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON
Publication No. 289
PRESS OF GIBSON BROTHERS, INC., WASHINGTON, D. C.
page
page
Plate 1
Plate 2.
Plate 3.
Plate 4.
Plate 5.
Plate 6.
Plate 7.
Plate 8.
Plate 9.
Plate 10.
Plate 11.
Plate 12. Differential patterns;
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1962, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 61 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Criminal Law Act 1977/Schedule 8

Repealed by Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 (c. 43) with effect from 6th July 1981.
Layout 2
SCHEDULE 8 Transfer of Remand Hearings
1. A court which, on adjourning a case, makes an order under section 41(1) above is not required at that time to fix the time and place at which the case is to be resumed but shall do so as soon as practicable after the order ceases to be in force.
2. Where an order under subsection (1) of section 41 above is made in the course of proceedings which, for the purposes of section 3 of the 1967 c. 80.Criminal Justice Act 1967 (reporting restrictions and their removal), are committal proceedings, proceedings relating to the accused before the alternate court are also committal proceedings for those purposes.
3. A court making an order under subsection (1) of section 41 above or remanding the accused under subsection (4) shall at once notify the court before which the accused is to be brought as to the terms of the order or remand.
4. A person to whom an order under section 41(1) above applies shall, if released on bail, be bailed to appear before the court which made the order.
5. Section 41 above and this Schedule have effect notwithstanding anything in sections 6 and 14 of the 1952 c. 55.Magistrates’ Courts Act 1952 or section 19(4) above.
# Criminal Procedure Act

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Criminal Procedure Act."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Criminal Procedure Act 1865 (28 & 29 Vict. c. 18), an UK Act of Parliament concerning the cross-examination and impeachment of witness.
* Criminal Procedure Act 1921 (SA), an South Australian Act that consolidates provisions on criminal procedure.
* Criminal Procedure Act, 1967 (No. 12 of 1967), an Irish Act that provided for miscellaneous provisions on criminal procedure.
* Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (51 of 1977), a South African Act that consolidates provisions on criminal procedure.
* Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), a New South Wales Act that consolidates provisions on criminal procedure.
* Criminal Procedure Act 2004 (WA), a West Australian Act that consolidates provisions on criminal procedure.
* Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic.), a Victorian Act that consolidates provisions on criminal procedure.
* Criminal Procedure Act 2011 (2011 No. 81), a New Zealand Act that consolidates provisions on criminal procedure and repeals parts of the Crimes Act 1961.

## See also

* Criminal Procedure Code; Code of Criminal Procedure
* Civil Procedure Act

### Related Acts

* Criminal Procedure (Right of Reply) Act 1964 (c. 34)
* Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964 (c. 84)
* Criminal Procedure (Attendance of Witnesses) Act 1965 (c. 69)
* Criminal Procedure (Insanity and Unfitness to Plead) Act 1991 (c. 25)
* Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (c. 25)

### Scotland

* Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1975 (c. 21), repealed by Criminal Procedure (Consequential Provisions) (Scotland) Act 1995 (c. 40).
* Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 (c. 46)
# Commissioners of Marion County v. Clark

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
94 U.S. 278
Commissioners of Marion County v. Clark
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas.
Mr. A. L. Williams for the plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Alfred Ennis, contra.
MR. JUSTICE CLIFFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Committee For Nuclear Responsibility Inc v. Schlesinger A-483

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
404 U.S. 917
Committee for Nuclear Responsibility, Inc., et al. v. Schlesinger, Chairman of Atomic Energy Commission, et al.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
No. A-483
The Application for Injunction in Aid of Jurisdiction, having been considered by the Court on oral argument and on the papers and documents submitted by the parties, is hereby denied.
See: — U.S. App. D.C. —, —, —, 463 F. 2d 783, 788, 796.
David Sive argued the cause for appellants. With him on the application for injunction were Harold P. Green and Thomas B. Steel, Jr.
Solicitor General Griswold argued the cause for respondents.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse