OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Reports/Volume 555

* 555 U. S. 1 (2008) Moore v. United States
* 555 U. S. 5 (2008) Brunner v. Ohio Republican Party
* 555 U. S. 7 (2008) Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
* 555 U. S. 55 (2008) Bell v. Kelly
* 555 U. S. 57 (2008) Hedgpeth v. Pulido
* 555 U. S. 70 (2008) Alita Group, Inc. v. Good
* 555 U. S. 113 (2008) Jimenez v. Quarterman
* 555 U. S. 122 (2008) Chambers v. United States
* 555 U. S. 135 (2008) Herring v. United States
* 555 U. S. 160 (2008) Oregon v. Ice
* 555 U. S. 179 (2008) Waddington v. Sarausad
* 555 U. S. 207 (2008) Locke v. Karass
* 555 U. S. 223 (2008) Pearson v. Callahan
* 555 U. S. 246 (2008) Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee
* 555 U. S. 261 (2008) Spears v. United States
* 555 U. S. 271 (2008) Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County
* 555 U. S. 285 (2008) Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont Savings and Investment Plan
* 555 U. S. 305 (2008) United States v. Eurodif S. A.
* 555 U. S. 323 (2008) Arizona v. Johnson
* 555 U. S. 335 (2008) Van de Kamp v. Goldstein
* 555 U. S. 350 (2008) Nelson v. United States
* 555 U. S. 353 (2008) Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Association
* 555 U. S. 379 (2008) Carcieri v. Salazar
* 555 U. S. 415 (2008) United States v. Hayes
* 555 U. S. 438 (2008) Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. linkLine Communications, Inc.
* 555 U. S. 460 (2008) Pleasant Grove City v. Summum
* 555 U. S. 488 (2008) Summers v. Earth Island Institute
* 555 U. S. 511 (2008) Negusie v. Holder
* 555 U. S. 555 (2008) Wyeth v. Levine
# United States Reports/Volume 562

* 562 U.S. 1 (2011) Wilson v. Corcoran (per curiam)
* 562 U.S. 8 (2011) Abbott v. United States
* 562 U.S. 29 (2011) Los Angeles County v. Humphries
* 562 U.S. 40 (2011) Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S.A. (per curiam)
* 562 U.S. 42 (2011) Madison County v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York (per curiam)
* 562 U.S. 44 (2011) Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. United States
* 562 U.S. 61 (2011) Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N.A.
* 562 U.S. 86 (2011) Harrington v. Richter
* 562 U.S. 115 (2011) Premo v. Moore
* 562 U.S. 134 (2011) National Aeronautics and Space Administration v. Nelson
* 562 U.S. 170 (2011) Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP
* 562 U.S. 180 (2011) Ortiz v. Jordan
* 562 U.S. 195 (2011) Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. McCoy
* 562 U.S. 216 (2011) Swarthout v. Cooke (per curiam)
* 562 U.S. 223 (2011) Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC
* 562 U.S. 277 (2011) CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Alabama Department of Revenue
* 562 U.S. 307 (2011) Walker v. Martin
* 562 U.S. 323 (2011) Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.
* 562 U.S. 344 (2011) Michigan v. Bryant
* 562 U.S. 397 (2011) Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T Inc.
* 562 U.S. 411 (2011) Staub v. Proctor Hospital
* 562 U.S. 428 (2011) Henderson v. Shinseki
* 562 U.S. 443 (2011) Snyder v. Phelps
* 562 U.S. 476 (2011) Pepper v. United States
* 562 U.S. 521 (2011) Skinner v. Switzer
* 562 U.S. 545 (2011) Wall v. Kholi
* 562 U.S. 562 (2011) Milner v. Department of the Navy
* 562 U.S. 594 (2011) Felkner v. Jackson (per curiam)
# United States Reports/Volume 560

* 560 U.S. 1 (2010) Abbott v. Abbott
* 560 U.S. 48 (2010) Graham v. Florida
* 560 U.S. 126 (2010) United States v. Comstock
* 560 U.S. 183 (2010) American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League
* 560 U.S. 205 (2010) Lewis v. City of Chicago
* 560 U.S. 218 (2010) United States v. O'Brien
* 560 U.S. 242 (2010) Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.
* 560 U.S. 255 (2010) United States v. Marcus
* 560 U.S. 272 (2010) Robertson v. United States ex rel. Watson (per curiam)
* 560 U.S. 284 (2010) Jefferson v. Upton (per curiam)
* 560 U.S. 305 (2010) Samantar v. Yousuf
* 560 U.S. 330 (2010) Alabama v. North Carolina
* 560 U.S. 370 (2010) Berghuis v. Thompkins
* 560 U.S. 413 (2010) Levin v. Commerce Energy, Inc.
* 560 U.S. 438 (2010) Carr v. United States
* 560 U.S. 474 (2010) Barber v. Thomas
* 560 U.S. 505 (2010) Hamilton v. Lanning
* 560 U.S. 538 (2010) Krupski v. Costa Crociere S.P.A.
* 560 U.S. 558 (2010) United States v. Juvenile Male (per curiam)
* 560 U.S. 563 (2010) Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder
* 560 U.S. 586 (2010) Astrue v. Ratliff
* 560 U.S. 605 (2010) Dolan v. United States
* 560 U.S. 631 (2010) Holland v. Florida
* 560 U.S. 674 (2010) New Process Steel, L.P. v. National Labor Relations Board
* 560 U.S. 702 (2010) Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection
* 560 U.S. 746 (2010) City of Ontario v. Quon
* 560 U.S. 770 (2010) Schwab v. Reilly
* 560 U.S. 817 (2010) Dillon v. United States
# United States Reports/Volume 559

* 559 U.S. 1 (2010) Hemi Group, LLC v. City of New York
* 559 U.S. 32 (2010) Briscoe v. Virginia (per curiam)
* 559 U.S. 34 (2010) Wilkins v. Gaddy (per curiam)
* 559 U.S. 43 (2010) Thaler v. Haynes (per curiam)
* 559 U.S. 50 (2010) Florida v. Powell
* 559 U.S. 77 (2010) Hertz Corp. v. Friend
* 559 U.S. 98 (2010) Maryland v. Shatzer
* 559 U.S. 131 (2010) Kiyemba v. Obama (per curiam)
* 559 U.S. 133 (2010) Johnson v. United States
* 559 U.S. 154 (2010) Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick
* 559 U.S. 175 (2010) Mac's Shell Service, Inc. v. Shell Oil Products Co.
* 559 U.S. 196 (2010) Bloate v. United States
* 559 U.S. 229 (2010) Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v. United States
* 559 U.S. 260 (2010) United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa
* 559 U.S. 280 (2010) Graham County Soil and Water Conservation District v. United States ex rel. Wilson
* 559 U.S. 314 (2010) Berghuis v. Smith
* 559 U.S. 335 (2010) Jones v. Harris Associates L.P.
* 559 U.S. 356 (2010) Padilla v. Kentucky
* 559 U.S. 393 (2010) Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co.
* 559 U.S. 460 (2010) United States v. Stevens
* 559 U.S. 506 (2010) Conkright v. Frommert
* 559 U.S. 542 (2010) Perdue v. Kenny A.
* 559 U.S. 573 (2010) Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, L.P.A.
* 559 U.S. 633 (2010) Merck & Co. v. Reynolds
* 559 U.S. 662 (2010) Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.
* 559 U.S. 700 (2010) Salazar v. Buono
* 559 U.S. 766 (2010) Renico v. Lett
* 559 U.S. 799 (2010) Hui v. Castaneda
* 559 U.S. 1301 (2010) Jackson v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics (Roberts, Cir. J.)
# United States Reports/Volume 557

* 557 U.S. 1 (2009) Polar Tankers, Inc. v. City of Valdez
* 557 U.S. 29 (2009) Nijhawan v. Holder
* 557 U.S. 52 (2009) District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne
* 557 U.S. 110 (2009) Yeager v. United States
* 557 U.S. 137 (2009) Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bailey
* 557 U.S. 167 (2009) Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.
* 557 U.S. 193 (2009) Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Holder
* 557 U.S. 230 (2009) Forest Grove School District v. T.A.
* 557 U.S. 261 (2009) Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council
* 557 U.S. 305 (2009) Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts
* 557 U.S. 364 (2009) Safford Unified School District No. 1 v. Redding
* 557 U.S. 404 (2009) Atlantic Sounding Co., Inc. v. Townsend
* 557 U.S. 433 (2009) Horne v. Flores
* 557 U.S. 519 (2009) Cuomo v. Clearing House Association, LLC
* 557 U.S. 557 (2009) Ricci v. DeStefano
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/12th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 9

Chap. IX.—An Act authorizing the President of the United States to establish post routes, in certain cases.
President may direct a mail to be carried from the head quarters of any army of the United States to the nearest post.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States, during the existence of the war in which the United States are engaged, or of any war in which they may be engaged, shall be, and is hereby authorized to direct the Postmaster-General to send a mail between the head quarters of any army of the United States, and such post-office as he may think proper; and the route or road on which the same shall be conveyed, shall, to all intents and purposes be an established post road, so long as the mail shall be sent on the same, conformably to the authority hereby given.
Approved, January 14, 1813.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/12th Congress/2nd Session/Resolution 1

I. Resolution relative to the brilliant achievements of Captains Hull, Decatur, Jones, and Lieutenant Elliott.
Brilliant achievements of Captains Hull, Decatur, Jones, and Lieutenant Elliott.Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be, and he is hereby requested to present to Captain Hull of the frigate Constitution, Captain Decatur of the frigate United States, and Captain Jones of the sloop of war Wasp, each a gold medal, with suitable emblems and devices; and a silver medal, with like emblems and devices, to each commissioned officer of the aforesaid vessels, in testimony of the high sense entertained by Congress of the gallantry, good conduct, and services of the captains, officers, and crews of the aforesaid vessels in their respective conflicts with the British frigates the Guerriere and the Macedonian, and sloop of war Frolic: and the President is also requested to present a silver medal, with like emblems and devices, to the nearest male relative of Lieutenant Bush, and one to the nearest male relative of Lieutenant Funk, in testimony of the gallantry and merit of those deceased officers, in whom their country has sustained a loss much to be regretted.
Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the President of the United States be, and he hereby is requested to present to Lieutenant Elliott of the navy of the United States, an elegant sword, with suitable emblems and devices, in testimony of the just sense entertained by Congress of his gallantry and good conduct in boarding and capturing the British brigs Detroit and Caledonia, while anchored under the protection of Fort Erie.
Approved, January 29, 1813.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/12th Congress/2nd Session/Resolution 3

III. Resolution requesting the President of the United States to present medals to Captain William Bainbridge and the officers of the frigate Constitution.
A gold medal to Commodore William Bainbridge.Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be, and he is hereby requested to present to Captain William Bainbridge, of the frigate Constitution, a gold medal, with suitable emblems and devices, and a silver medal, with suitable emblems and devices, to each commissioned officer of the said frigate, in testimony of the high sense entertained by Congress of the gallantry, good conduct and services of Captain Bainbridge, his officers and crew, in the capture of the British frigate Java, after a brave and skilful combat.
Approved, March 3, 1813.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/12th Congress/2nd Session/Resolution 2

II. Resolutions, requesting the President of the United States to cause to be prepared and laid before Congress a system of Military Discipline.
A system of discipline for the army and militia to be passed.Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be, and he is hereby requested to cause to be prepared and laid before Congress, as soon as practicable, a military system of discipline for the infantry of the army and militia of the United States.
Approved, March 3, 1813.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/6th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 1

Chapter Ⅰ.—An Act for reviving and continuing suits and proceedings in the Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania.
Proceedings which were discontinued by the failure to hold October session 1799, revived. Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That all suits, process and proceedings, of what nature or kind soever, which were pending in the Circuit Court of the United States, for the district of Pennsylvania, at the time appointed by law for holding a session thereof in October, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-nine, and which were discontinued by failure to hold the said court, shall be, and they are hereby revived and continued, and the same proceedings may and shall be had in the same court, in all suits and process aforesaid, and in all things relating to the same, as by law might have been had in the same court, had it been regularly holden, at the time aforesaid.
Teste of writs.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That all writs and other process, which may have been, and which shall be issued, by the clerk of the said court, bearing teste of April session or October session, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-nine, shall be held and deemed of the same validity and effect, as if the same court had been regularly held on the eleventh day of October, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-nine.
Jurors may be summoned for next April term.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That it shall be lawful for the judge of the district court of the district of Pennsylvania, to direct the clerk of the said circuit court to issue such process, for the purpose of causing jurors to be summoned to attend at the session of the said circuit court, on the eleventh day of April next, as hath heretofore been issued for the like purposes, returnable to any preceding session thereof; and the persons so summoned shall,Penalties for non-attendance. in case of non-attendance, be liable to the same penalties as if such process had been issued in the ordinary course of proceeding.
Approved, December 24, 1799.
# United States Code/22/3926

§ 3926. Regulations; delegation of functions
    (a) The Secretary may prescribe such regulations as the Secretary deems appropriate to carry out functions under this chapter.
    (b) The Secretary may delegate functions under this chapter which are vested in the Secretary to any employee of the Department or any member of the Service.
# United States Code/22/3927

§ 3927. Chief of mission
    (a) Duties
    Under the direction of the President, the chief of mission to a foreign country—
       (1) shall have full responsibility for the direction, coordination, and supervision of all Government executive branch employees in that country (except for Voice of America correspondents on official assignment and employees under the command of a United States area military commander); and
       (2) shall keep fully and currently informed with respect to all activities and operations of the Government within that country, and shall insure that all Government executive branch employees in that country (except for Voice of America correspondents on official assignment and employees under the command of a United States area military commander) comply fully with all applicable directives of the chief of mission.
    (b) Duties of agencies with employees in foreign countries
Any executive branch agency having employees in a foreign country shall keep the chief of mission to that country fully and currently informed with respect to all activities and operations of its employees in that country, and shall insure that all of its employees in that country (except for Voice of America correspondents on official assignment and employees under the command of a United States area military commander) comply fully with all applicable directives of the chief of mission.
    (c) Promotion of United States goods and services
Each chief of mission to a foreign country shall have as a principal duty the promotion of United States goods and services for export to such country.
# United States Code/22/3923

    (a) The Service shall be administered to the extent practicable in a manner that will assure maximum compatibility among the agencies authorized by law to utilize the Foreign Service personnel system. To this end, the other heads of such agencies shall consult regularly with the Secretary of State.
    (b) Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed as diminishing the authority of the head of any agency authorized by law to utilize the Foreign Service personnel system.
# United States Code/22/3929a

§ 3929a. Abolishment of Inspector General of Department of State and Foreign Service
Notwithstanding section 3929 of this title, the Inspector General of the Department of State and the Foreign Service is hereby abolished.
# United States Code/22/3927a

§ 3927a. Review by chief of mission
(a) Review of staff element under chief of mission authority; approval; process
    The Secretary of State shall require each chief of mission to review, not less than once every 5 years, every staff element under chief of mission authority, including staff from other departments or agencies of the United States, and recommend approval or disapproval of each staff element. Each such review shall be conducted pursuant to a process established by the President for determining appropriate staffing at diplomatic missions and overseas constituent posts (commonly referred to as the “NSDD–38 process”).
(b) Actions by Secretary of State
    The Secretary of State, as part of the process established by the President referred to in subsection (a) of this section, shall take actions to carry out the recommendations made in each such review.
(c) Reports
    Not later than 1 year after December 8, 2004, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of State shall submit a report on such reviews that occurred during the previous 12 months, together with the Secretary’s recommendations regarding such reviews to the appropriate committees of Congress, the heads of all affected departments or agencies, and the Inspector General of the Department of State.
# United States Code/22/3922b

(a) Statement of policy The following should be the policy of the United States: (1) The Foreign Service should recruit individuals with expertise and professional experience in public diplomacy. (2) United States chiefs of mission should have a prominent role in the formulation of public diplomacy strategies for the countries and regions to which they are assigned and should be accountable for the operation and success of public diplomacy efforts at their posts. (3) Initial and subsequent training of Foreign Service officers should be enhanced to include information and training on public diplomacy and the tools and technology of mass communication. (b) Personnel (1) Qualifications In the recruitment, training, and assignment of members of the Foreign Service, the Secretary of State— (A) should emphasize the importance of public diplomacy and applicable skills and techniques; (B) should consider the priority recruitment into the Foreign Service, including at middle-level entry, of individuals with expertise and professional experience in public diplomacy, mass communications, or journalism; and (C) shall give special consideration to individuals with language facility and experience in particular countries and regions. (2) Languages of special interest The Secretary of State shall seek to increase the number of Foreign Service officers proficient in languages spoken in countries with predominantly Muslim populations. Such increase should be accomplished through the recruitment of new officers and incentives for officers in service.
# United States Code/22/3925

§ 3925. Compatibility between Foreign Service and other Government personnel systems
The Service shall be administered to the extent practicable in conformity with general policies and regulations of the Government. The Secretary shall consult with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, and the heads of such other agencies as the President shall determine, in order to assure compatibility of the Foreign Service personnel system with other Government personnel systems to the extent practicable.
# United States Code/22/3924

§ 3924. Uniform and consolidated administration of Service
The Secretary shall on a continuing basis consider the need for uniformity of personnel policies and procedures and for consolidation (in accordance with section 2695 of this title) of personnel functions among agencies utilizing the Foreign Service personnel system. Where feasible, the Secretary of State shall encourage (in consultation with the other heads of such agencies) the development of uniform policies and procedures and consolidated personnel functions.
# United States Code/22/3928

§ 3928. Director General of Foreign Service
The President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, a Director General of the Foreign Service, who shall be a current or former career member of the Foreign Service. The Director General should assist the Secretary of State in the management of the Service and perform such functions as the Secretary of State may prescribe
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/12th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 121

Chap. CXXI.—An Act making an appropriation for the purpose of discharging all the outstanding claims for the construction and repair of the Capitol and the President’s House; for the compensation of the late Surveyor of the Public Buildings, and for furniture for the different apartments of the Capitol, and for other purposes.
Specific appropriations.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That for the purpose of satisfying all outstanding claims for services performed and materials furnished for the construction and repair of the capitol and President’s house, including therein the sum of two thousand five hundred dollars for the compensation of the late surveyor of the public buildings, to the first day of July, one thousand eight hundred and eleven, when his duties in that capacity ceased; for furniture for the different apartments of the capitol, and for contingent expenses relating thereto, the sum of fourteen thousand five hundred and seventy-three dollars be, and the same is hereby appropriated to be applied to the discharge of the claims before mentioned, and to no other purpose whatsoever.
Appropriation to pay the expenses of certain Italian sculptors.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That a sum not exceeding one thousand dollars be, and the same is hereby appropriated for the purpose of enabling the President of the United States to return to their native country, the two Italian sculptors lately employed on the public buildings, and to close the original contract made with them on behalf of the United States.
Contract for the completion of the sculpture.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That the superintendent of the city of Washington be authorized to contract for the completion of the sculpture in the south wing of the capitol, under the direction of the President of the United States, and that the sum of four thousand dollars be appropriated towards defraying the expense of the same.
Galleries of the Senate.Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That a sum not exceeding four thousand dollars be, and the same is hereby appropriated for the completing the sculpture and the work on the galleries of the Senate chamber, the railing of the stairs and minor works, deficient in the east part of the north wing of the capitol, and for temporary repairs to the roof.
Sec. 5. And be it further enacted, That the aforesaid sums shall be paid out of any monies in the treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, July 5, 1812.