OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Grimm's Household Tales, Volume 2/The Rose

Legend 3. Notes
3.—THE ROSE
There was once a poor woman who had two children. The youngest had to go every day into the forest to fetch wood. Once when she had gone a long way to seek it, a little child, who was quite strong, came and helped her industriously to pick up the wood and carry it home, and then before a moment had passed the strange child disappeared. The child told her mother this, but at first she would not believe it. At length she brought a rose home, and told her mother that the beautiful child had given her this rose, and had told her that when it was in full bloom, he would return. The mother put the rose in water. One morning her child could not get out of bed, the mother went to the bed and found her dead, but she lay looking very happy. On the same morning, the rose was in full bloom.
# Historical Account of the Navigable Rivers, Canals, and Railways, of Great Britain/Axe River

AXE RIVER.
42 George III. Cap. 58, Royal Assent 24th May, 1802.
The River Axe has its rise about a mile west of the city of Wells, in Somersetshire, whence, running westward by Wookey, and across the level of Cluer, to the village of Lower Weare, two miles west of Axbridge, and thence by Loxton and Bleadon to Uphill, it falls into the Bristol Channel in Uphill Bay.
Previous to 1802, the Axe was a very indifferent navigation, as a tideway river, to the village of Lower Weare, situate on the high road leading from Bridgewater to Axbridge; but in consequence of the spring tides rising in the Bristol Channel to the height of 40 feet, and there being no locks or sluices on the course to check the advance of the tides, the low lands on its banks were ​frequently overflowed and rendered useless for agricultural purposes. Application was therefore made to parliament for powers enabling the proprietors of lands to improve the drainage of the same, and to make the navigation more efficient; an act accordingly was obtained on the day above quoted, entitled, 'An Act for draining, preserving from Water, and improving, certain Low Lands and Grounds, lying within the several parishes, or chapelries, of Wookey, Westbury, Rodney-Stoke, Wedmore, Mear, Weare, Nyland, Badgworth, Biddisham, East Brent, South Brent, Cheddar, Axbridge, Compton Bishop, Loxton, Bleadon, Brean, Berrow, and Lympsham, all in the county of Somerset; and for altering and improving the Navigation of the River Axe, within the said parishes of Bleadon, Lympsham, Loxton, East Brent, Compton Bishop, Biddisham, Badgworth, Weare, and Axbridge, some or one of them, above and from a certain place called Southern Mead Bars, situate within the said parish of Bleadon.' By this act, the execution of the works proposed, was entrusted to three commissioners, who were authorized to raise £15,000, on mortgage of the rates and assessments which they were empowered to collect, for the purposes of the act, from owners of lands that were benefited by the drainage; and for their trouble, in executing the trust, a salary of three guineas a-day each was also granted them. Their power extended to four years and six months beyond the time required for the execution of the works, and after that, the navigation and drainage were to be vested in the commissioners of sewers for the county of Somerset.
In the execution of the above works, the commissioners have shortened the navigation by making two cuts, one of which, near Loxton, is above a mile in length They have also constructed a lock, near Southern Mead Bars, which is the only one upon the river. The navigation, by this act, is free of toll. It extends to the village of Lower Weare, near Axbridge, and from its head, to its fall into the Bristol Channel, is nine miles in length.
The line of the proposed Bristol and Taunton Canal crosses this river, near the village of Loxton, and from whence, a branch was laid out to extend to Cheddar, but this part of that projected canal, together with the above-mentioned branch, is now abandoned.
# Historical Account of the Navigable Rivers, Canals, and Railways, of Great Britain/Baybridge Canal
## BAYBRIDGE CANAL.

       6 George IV. Cap. 164, Royal Assent 22nd June, 1825.
This canal proceeds from Binesbridge, in the parish of West Grinstead, where the navigation of the River Arun commences, and keeps the course of the unnavigable part of the Arun, to Baybridge, where it terminates. It is in length three miles and three-eighths, with a rise of 14 feet, by two locks of 7 feet each. It is 28 feet wide at top, and 4 feet deep.
The act for making it received the royal assent in 1825, and is entitled, 'An Act for making and maintaining a navigable Cut or Canal, from the River Adur, at or near Binesbridge, in the parish of West Grinstead, in the county of Sussex, to Baybridge, in the said parish.'
The company of proprietors consisted of Lord Selsey, Sir Charles Merrick Burrell, Walter Burrell, William Peckham Woodward, John Wood, James Eversfield, and James Lancaster, who were incorporated by the name and style of "The Baybridge Canal Company." They were empowered to raise among themselves £6,000, in one hundred and twenty shares of £50 each, with a power of raising a further sum of £3,000, on mortgage of the rates, &c. which are as follows.

### TONNAGE RATES.

| | d. |
| Beech, Gravel, or other Materials used in the repair of Roads, Chalk, Dung, Mould, Soil, Compost or other Articles (except Lime) to be used for the manuring of Land | 2 | per Ton per Mile. |
| Goods, Wares, Articles, Commodities or Merchandize | 5d ditto, ditto. |
       Fractions of a Ton and of a Mile, shall not be deemed less than a Quarter.
| Wharfage of any Goods remaining less than Seventy-two Hours | 9 | per Ton. |
The estimate for making this canal was made by May Upton, Esq. civil engineer, in 1824, and amounted to the sum of £5,957, 16s. 7d. The advantages arising from it are chiefly local, and consist of the increased facility by which manure may be brought into the interior, and the agricultural produce more easily disposed of.
# Historical Account of the Navigable Rivers, Canals, and Railways, of Great Britain/Avon River, Hampshire
## AVON RIVER.

17 Charles II. Cap. 12, Royal Assent 2nd March, 1664.
This river has its source three miles east of the town of Devizes, in Wiltshire, and after passing Park Shipton, and Rushall, it takes a southerly course along the east-end of Salisbury Plain, passing Enford Priory, Syrencot House, and the town of Amesbury; and two miles to the west of Stonehenge, it proceeds by Lake House, and the ruins of Old Sarum, to New Sarum, or Salisbury, where its stream is considerably augmented, by being united with the little Rivers Wily, the Nadder, and the Bourne. From Salisbury, its course is nearly south, through a delightful country, to the town of Fording Bridge, thence to Ringwood, and to Christchurch Bay, where it falls into the sea.
This river was made navigable, from Christchurch to Salisbury, under the powers of an act of the 17th Charles II. entitled, 'An Act for making the River Avon navigable from Christchurch to the city of New Sarum,' but the whole of the works having been swept away by a flood, soon after its completion, it was suffered to continue in that ruinous condition until the year 1771, when the celebrated Brindley surveyed its course, and recommended a new canal to be cut parallel with the river.
Though this suggestion of Mr. Brindley's was not carried into execution, some repairs of the old works were commenced; these, however, were so inefficient, as to give rise to the scheme of a canal from Southampton to Salisbury.
When the act was obtained for the above scheme, the River Avon, as a navigation, was abandoned; and it is now navigable only as a tide river, free of toll, for very small vessels only, for the distance of two miles from the sea, with 5½ feet water at spring tides. At other times, the bar, at the entrance of Christchurch Harbour, is an insurmountable obstacle, which may be further inferred from the circumstance that there are but four small vessels belonging to Christchurch.
The length of the original navigation, to Salisbury, was thirty-six miles, viz. from Christchurch to Ringwood, thirteen miles and a half; from thence to Fording Bridge, seven miles and a half; and from thence to Salisbury, fifteen miles.
# Guy Mannering/Errata

ERRATA.
* Vol. I. p. 207. For Mr Mervyn, read Mrs Mervyn.
* Vol. 1. p. 258. For Miss Bertram's, read Miss Mannering's.
* Vol. 1. p. 272. For the first, read the latter.
* Vol. III. p. 309. (In some copies) For minute, read minutely.
# Guy Mannering/Volume 1

GUY MANNERING;
OR,
THE ASTROLOGER.
GUY MANNERING;
OR,
THE ASTROLOGER.
BY THE AUTHOR OF "WAVERLEY."
IN THREE VOLUMES.
VOL. I.
EDINBURGH:
Printed by James Ballantyne and Co.
FOR LONGMAN, HURST, REES, ORME, AND BROWN, LONDON; AND ARCHIBALD CONSTABLE AND CO. EDINBURGH.
1815.
GUY MANNERING;
OR,
THE ASTROLOGER.
* Chapter 1
* Chapter 2
* Chapter 3
* Chapter 4
* Chapter 5
* Chapter 6
* Chapter 7
* Chapter 8
* Chapter 9
* Chapter 10
* Chapter 11
* Chapter 12
* Chapter 13
* Chapter 14
* Chapter 15
* Chapter 16
* Chapter 17
* Chapter 18
* Chapter 19
* Chapter 20
* Chapter 21
# Guy Mannering

* related portals: English literature, Scotland.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
First edition.
* Volume 1
* Volume 2
* Volume 3
* Errata
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Garner v. California

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
386 U.S. 272
Garner v. California
Harold Lloyd Garner, pro se.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, and Robert R. Granucci and John F. Kraetzer, Deputy Attys. Gen., for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of California.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Garner v. California/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
386 U.S. 272
Garner v. California
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824.
Mr. Justice STEWART would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S., at 42, 87 S.Ct., at 837.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Garner v. Louisiana
## Concurring Opinions

    Frankfurter
    Douglas
    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
368 U.S. 157
Garner v. Louisiana
Argued: Oct. 18 and 19, 1961. --- Decided: Dec 11, 1961
Jack Greenberg, New York City, for the petitioners.
John F. Ward, Jr., Baton Rouge, La., for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hale Memorial: The Birthplace of Nathan Hale

A recreation of part of an earlier headstone that is now no longer erect
HALE MEMORIAL THE BIRTHPLACE OF NATHAN HALE
Durable stone preserve the monumental record Nathan Hale Esq. a Capt. in the army of the United States who was born June 6th, 1755 and receiv'd the first honors of Yale College Sept. 1773. resign'd his life a sacrifice to his country's liberty at New York Sept. 22$^d$ 1776. Etatis 22$^d$
Epitaph
His last words were: "I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country"
ERECTED A.D. 1937 BY GEORGE DUDLEY SEYMOUR
One or more copyright licenses apply to this work.
Original text from 1793:
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
Any newer text:
This work is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Halcyon

is a short dialogue attributed in the manuscripts to both Plato and Lucian, although the work is not by either writer.
English-language translations of el:Ἀλκυών include:
# Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp.

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
342 U.S. 282
Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp.
Argued: Nov. 27, 1951. --- Decided: Jan 14, 1952
Mr. Joseph W. Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., for Halcyon Lines.
Mr. Thomas E. Byrne, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., for Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hale Headstone

* Hale Headstone (1793), the original headstone (now gone but a picture survives), erected to honor several Hale family members
* Hale Memorial: The Birthplace of Nathan Hale (1937), a newer headstone with some of the same text, erected by George Dudley Seymour, only mentioning Nathan Hale
# Hale v. Akers

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
132 U.S. 554
Hale v. Akers

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Haldeman v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
91 U.S. 584
Haldeman v. United States
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kentucky.
Mr. John M. Harlan for the plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Assistant Attorney-General Edwin B. Smith, contra.
Mr. JUSTICE DAVIS delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Handbook of style in use at the Riverside Press/Preface

PREFACE
Men differ so radically in their preferences as to spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and other typographical matters, that it is impracticable to frame a set of inflexible rules for printing. This Handbook merely sets forth the general custom of one large printing-office,—‍a custom which is the result of many years of widely varying experience. While all the rules here given are believed to be sound, and in general are to be followed exactly, many of them are not considered altogether inviolable. Much must be left to the purpose and feeling of the writer whose work is being printed, and the application of rules must be elastic enough to meet all cases. The printing art is servant to the author, not his master.
Absolute completeness has not been aimed at; the dictionary has not been displaced; common-sense and good judgment must always be used by compositors and proof-readers. It is hoped, however, that the Handbook will prove of practical use in standardizing work and preventing misunderstandings.
The constant aim in preparing it has been to express the traditions and customs that have grown up at The Riverside Press during more than half a century of work. On many points, however, the style manuals of several other large printing offices have been consulted (especially those of the University of Chicago Press, the Government Printing Office, the Plimpton Press, the Norwood Press, and R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company), and grateful acknowledgment is here made of the help they have afforded. Particular credit should be given to the very thorough and excellent Manual of Style published by the University of Chicago Press.
March 31, 1914.
# Handbook of style in use at the Riverside Press/Italics

ITALICS
Italicize—
Words and phrases to which it is desired to lend emphasis.
Words and phrases from foreign languages, occurring in the text, except when they are quoted, or form part of a conversation. Do not italicize foreign words of everyday occurrence. Words in the following list need not be italicized:—
Titles of books, pamphlets, etc., in prefaces, introductions, footnotes, and end-notes, and in Educational Department publications, unless otherwise indicated, in both text and footnotes. Also in the text in cases where the copy is so marked, and special instructions have been given to follow the copy.
Names of genera and species in zoological and botanical matter, and names of stars in constellations in astronomical matter. Medical terms are not italicized.
The words See and See also, when used for purposes of cross-reference in indexes.
Letters used to indicate subdivisions; as, (a) (b) (c). And a, b, c, etc., affixed to figures; as, ii4a.
Letters used in algebraic and other mathematical work.
​Letters in mottoes to illustrations, or in the text referring to corresponding letters in accompanying illustrations.
References to particular letters; as “the letter a”; “the cockney dropping of the h.”
The word continued in headlines or titles; and To be continued at the end of an installment of a serial in periodicals.
The words, phrases, and abbreviations used in literary and legal references, and in indicating English money, as specified in the section on Abbreviations, pages 6 and 7.
# Handbook of style in use at the Riverside Press/Footnotes

FOOTNOTES
Footnotes should be set in 9 point for 12 point text; in 8 point for 11 and 10 point text; and in 6 point for 9 and 8 point text.
Reference signs are no longer used, but the general practice is to use superior figures in both text and notes. In special cases the asterisk, dagger, etc., or superior letters, may be used. The copy is to be followed in such cases.
Separate the reference figure in a note from the first letter by a 3-em space. In the text, if the figure follows a period or comma, no space is required; otherwise, separate it from the character preceding by a 5-em space.
If notes are short, and the measure permits, two or more may be put in one line, with at least 2 ems between. If this is not practicable, where two or more occur on the same page, none of which is a full line in length, centre the longest line, and align the shorter ones with it. If there be on the page but one note of a single short line, this should be centred.
If in the text there are extracts in the same or nearly the same size of type as the notes, coming at the bottom of the page, a full-width single rule should be used to separate the notes from the extracts.
In wide measure, the notes may be set to advantage in half-measure, with blank space of an eight-point em between the columns. This method of composition frequently saves space, and gives a more compact page, when the notes are short. When this method is used, the half-measure should not be used for a single note unless it makes at least two full lines.
Where references to the same work follow each other closely and without other references intervening, use ibid. instead of repeating the title. The full reference should, however, be repeated where it appears as the first note on a succeeding page; or, if the title is long, repeat the author’s name, with loc. cit. or op. cil.
Footnotes to tabular work should be set in 6 point, and should invariably be placed at the foot of the table, and not at the foot of the page, if text type intervenes.
The following are examples of the most usual method of citing authorities in footnotes:—
$^1$ U. S. Grant, Personal Memoirs, vol. ii, p. 204.
$^2$ Southern Magazine, vol. xv, p. 300.
$^3$ Herbert Spencer, Social Statics, chap. iii, p. 62.
$^4$ Ibid., chap. iv.
$^5$ Grant, loc. cit.
$^6$ Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (Milman ed.), vol. i, chap. xxiv.
$^7$ Morris Schaff, “The Battle of the Wilderness,” Atlantic Monthly, June, 1909.
# Historic Highways of America/Volume 6/Quote

* It is impossible to come upon this road without pausing, or to write of it without a tribute.
* —James Lane Allen.
Layout 2
# Historic Highways of America/Volume 5/Title

The Old Glade (Forbes's) Road
Layout 2
# Historic Highways of America/Volume 6

Cumberland Gap and Boone's Wilderness Road
HISTORIC HIGHWAYS OF AMERICA VOLUME 6
Boone's Wilderness Road
BY Archer Butler Hulbert
With Maps and Illustrations
THE ARTHUR H. CLARK COMPANY CLEVELAND, OHIO 1903
COPYRIGHT, 1903 BY The Arthur H. Clark Company
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1933, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 90 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Historic Highways of America/Volume 6/Title

Boone's Wilderness Road
Layout 2
# Helvering v. Fried

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
299 U.S. 175
Helvering v. Fried
Argued: Nov. 9, 1936. --- Decided: Dec 7, 1936
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Robert H.
Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Mr. John J. Curtin, of New York City, for respondents.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Fuller

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
310 U.S. 69
Helvering v. Fuller
Argued: March 26, 1940. --- Decided: April 22, 1940
Messrs. Robert H. Jackson, Atty. Gen., and Arnold Raum, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from page 70 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Francis W. Cole, of Hartford, Conn., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Fitch

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
309 U.S. 149
Helvering v. Fitch
Argued: Jan. 5, 8, 1940. --- Decided: Jan 29, 1940
Mr. Arnold Raum, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Messrs. Wm. D. Mitchell, of New York City, and Arnold F. Schaetzle, of Des Moines, Iowa, for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. F. & R. Lazarus & Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
308 U.S. 252
Helvering v. F. & R. Lazarus & Company
Argued: Nov. 14, 1939. --- Decided: Dec 4, 1939
Messrs. Frank Murphy, Atty. Gen., and Norman D. Keller, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Messrs. Murray Seasongood and Robert P. Goldman, both of Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse