OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Hymns for the Amusement of Children (1791)/Against Despair

HYMN XXXII. Against DESPAIR. OLD RALPH in the WOOD.
A raven once an Acorn took From Bashan's tallest stoutest tree; He hid it by a limpid brook, And liv'd another oak to see.
5 Thus Melancholy buries Hope, Which Providence keeps still alive, And bids us with afflictions cope, And all anxiety survive.
Notes
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hymns for our Lord's Resurrection/Hymn XII

Hymn XII.
1RISE all who seek the Crucified, The GOD that once for Sinners died With lifted Voice and Heart adore, Chasing our Griefs, and Sins, and Fears, The Sun of Righteousness appears, Appears, to set in Blood no more.
2To Death deliver'd in our stead, For Us He rises from the Dead, And Life to all his Members brings; He gives us, while he soars above, The Dew of Grace, the Balm of Love, And drops Salvation from his Wings.
3This Day the Scripture is fulfill'd, The Father now his Son hath seal'd, And own'd him for his Son with Power; GOD from the Belly of the Earth Hath call'd Him forth to second Birth, Nor let the greedy Deep devour.
4Cast for our Sins into the Deep, His Life hath sav'd the sinking Ship, His Life for Ours a Ransom given; But lo! on the Third Joyful Morn Our Jonas doth for Us return Emerging from his Tomb to Heaven.
# Hymns for our Lord's Resurrection/Hymn XIII

Hymn XIII.
1BREAK forth into Praise!
Our Surety and Head His Members to raise,
Hath rose from the Dead:
​The Power of his Spirit
Hath quicken'd our Lord, That we by his Merit
May all be restor'd.
2Our Captain and King
With Shouts we proclaim, And joyfully sing
The wonderful Name;
The Name all-victorious
We publish, and feel, Triumphantly glorious
O'er Sin, Earth, and Hell.
3The Power of his Rise
We know and declare, And rapt to the Skies,
His Happiness share;
In Heavenly Places
With Jesus we sit, And Jesus' Praises
With Angels repeat.
4We sing of his Love
While sojourning here, Till Christ from above
Our Saviour appear;
The Heirs of Salvation
With Triumph receive, In full Consummation
Of Glory to live.
# Hymns for our Lord's Resurrection/Hymn XVI

Hymn XVI.
For Ascension-Day.
1ALL hail the True Elijah, The Lord our GOD and Saviour! Who leaves behind, For all Mankind, The Token of his Favour,
The never-dying Prophet, A while to Mortals givem, This solemn Day Is rapt away By flaming Steeds to Heaven.
​2Come see the Rising Triumph, And prostrate fall before Him: He mounts, He flies Above the Skies, Where all his Hosts adore him.
Borne on his Fiery Chariot, With joyful Acclamation Pursue the Lord, To Heaven restor'd, The GOD of our Salvation.
3Who see their LORD at Parting, They shall on Earth inherit A double Power, A larger Shower Of his descending Spirit.
The Spirit of our Master Shall rest on each Believer, And surely we Our Master see, Who lives and reigns for ever.
4Yes, our exalted Jesus, By Faith we now adore Thee, And still we sit Before thy Feet, And triumph in thy Glory.
In vain the Flaming Chariot
Hath parted us asunder, We still thro' Grace Behold thy Face, And shout our Loving Wonder.
5By Faith we catch thy Mantle, The Covering of thy Spirit By Faith we wear, And gladly share Thine All-involving Merit.
We rest beneath thy Shadow, Till by the Whirlwind driven, From Earth we rise, And mount the Skies, And grasp our LORD in Heaven.
FINIS.
# Infantry, Part I: Regular Army /Between World Wars, 1919-1941

U.S. Army Center for Military History publication

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Infanticide

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Infanticide."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Infanticide," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Infanticide", in Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)
# Infant Sorrow (Notebook)

Notebook, p. 113, reversed. See also: Songs and Ballads
INFANT SORROW
My mother groand! my father wept.
Into the dangerous world I leapt:
Helpless, naked, piping loud;
Like a fiend hid in a cloud.
5 Struggling in my fathers bands:
Striving against my swadling bands:
Bound and weary I thought best
To sulk upon my mothers breast.
When I saw that rage was vain
10 And to sulk would nothing gain
Turning many a trick or wile
I began to soothe & smile
And I grew day after day
Till upon the ground I stray 15 And I grew night after night
Seeking only for delight
And I saw before me shine
Clusters of the wandring vine
And beyond a mirtle tree
20 Stretchd its blossoms out to me
But a Priest [My Father] with holy look
In his hand a holy book
Pronouncd curses on his head
Who the fruit or blossoms shed
25 I beheld the Priest by night
He embracd my mirtle bright
I beheld the Priest by day
Where beneath my vine he lay
Like a serpent in the night
30 He embracd my mirtle bright
Like a serpent in the day
Underneath my vine he lay
So I smote him & his gore
Staind the roots my mirtle bore 35 But the time of youth is fled
And grey hairs are on my head
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Infancy Gospel of Thomas

* related portals: Christianity.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, quotes, Wikidata item.
A non-canonical gospel recounting the adventures and miracles of the boyhood Jesus, sometimes referred to as the "Gospel of Thomas", until a different work by that name was found in the Nag Hammadi Library. Probably written in Greek or Syriac between 140 and 170 CE (AD).
English-language translations of Infancy Gospel of Thomas include:

## Translations

* Infancy Gospel of Thomas (Jeremiah Jones translation), 18th century, reprinted in The Suppressed Gospels and Epistles, 19th century – only a part of the gospel is covered in this translation, since Jones had only a Greek fragment to work with.
* Infancy Gospel of Thomas (Alexander Walker translation of the Latin form) from Ante-Nicene Fathers, 19th century
* Infancy Gospel of Thomas (Alexander Walker translation of the first Greek form), ibid
* Infancy Gospel of Thomas (Alexander Walker translation of the second Greek form), ibid
* Infancy Gospel of Thomas (M. R. James translation of the Latin form), from The Apocryphal New Testament, 1924
* Infancy Gospel of Thomas (M. R. James translation of the first Greek form), ibid
* Infancy Gospel of Thomas (M. R. James translation of the second Greek form), ibid

## See also

* The Gospel of Thomas, a sayings gospel found in the Nag Hammadi Library

## External links

* Early Christian Writings: Infancy Gospel of Thomas
# Inez (Letitia Elizabeth Landon)

* From The Literary Gazette, May 1823
* From The Improvisatrice; and Other Poems (1824)
# Infant Sorrow

* Infant Sorrow — the poem by William Blake from his Songs of Experience
* Infant Sorrow — the poem by William Blake from his Notebook
Fragments assotiated with:
* In a mirtle shade — the poem by William Blake from his Notebook
* To my Mirtle — the poem by William Blake from his Notebook
# Infantry, Part I: Regular Army /Foreword

U.S. Army Center for Military History publication
* Washington, D.C.
* 15 April 1971
* JAMES L. COLLINS, JR.
* Brigadier General, USA
* Chief of Military History

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Infant Joy

This poem was originally published in the collection Songs of Innocence (1789).
# Hugh v. Higgs

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
21 U.S. 697
Hugh v. Higgs
ERROR to the Circuit Court for the District of Columbia. March 6th.
This cause was argued by Mr. Key, for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. Jones, for the defendants in error. March 14th.
Mr. Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

* ↑ He cited Carpenter v. Thornton, 3 Barnw. & Ald. 52.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hughes Bros Timber Company v. Minnesota

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
272 U.S. 469
Hughes Bros Timber Company v. Minnesota
Argued: Oct. 7, 1926. --- Decided: Nov 23, 1926
Messrs. H. A. Carmichael, W. D. Bailey, and Oscar Mitchell, and of Duluth, Minn., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from page 470 intentionally omitted] Messrs. James E. Markham, Clifford Hilton, and G. A.
Youngquist, all of St. Paul, Minn., and H. H. Phelps, of Glendale, Cal., for State of Minnesota.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Huggins v. Raines/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
374 U.S. 105
Huggins v. Raines
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma for reconsideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 and Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506, 82 S.Ct. 884, 8 L.Ed.2d 70.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hugh Low Vindicates Ah Quee

* related portals: Secret societies.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Published in Harper's New Monthly Magazine, Volume 84, Issue 489, December, 1891, page 164.
THE HURST, BOURNEMOUTH, 31st August, 1891.
DEAR MR. BOYLE,
I have seen in this home of my wife's father a copy of HARPERS MAGAZINE for September, in which is your article on Chinese Secret Societies, which I find to contain much interesting information, but there are one or two inaccuracies which I am sure you will take steps to correct, as they do great injustice to my friend Captain Chang Ah Kwi, of Perak, whom you have inadvertently stated to have been tried (presumably before British authorities) on a charge of murder.
As the Magazine is taken in at the Perak Club and other reading-rooms there, this must necessarily give great pain to Captain Ah Kwi and his numerous friends in the Straits Settlements and China. It is true that in the disturbances which preceeded the British intervention under Sir Andrew Clarke, in 1874, Captain Ah Kwi was one of the leaders of the Go Kwan faction, as Captain Ah Yam was of the other, or Li Keran party. But their operations against each other were conducted on the primiciple of open war by large bodies of men.
Long subsequently, On his revisiting his native country of China, an accusation was made against him before time mandarins in the Canton province, and he was arrested, but triumphantly acquitted of the charge of piracy, which had been alleged against him, and which, it was well known, had been advanced by rivals in the tin-mining business, which he had so extensively conducted in Perak.
Neither Captain Ah Kwi nor Captain Ah Yam, both of whom are at this moment and have long been members of the State Council, was ever arrested on criminal charges where British influence prevailed. Each of them has from time beginning been a strenuous supporter of the settlement of the State of Perak, which has been so successfully carried out under the Governors of Colonies of the Straits Settlements.
Khu-Tan-Tek was, I believe, reprieved on the representation of the distinguished judge Sir Bronson Maxwell, before whom his trial had taken place.
I am quite sure that you will understand my desire that my old friend Ah Kwi's name should be vindicated, and I am equally certain that you will take the necessary steps to bring this about.
Yours sincerely,
Hugh Low

# Reference/Source

* Hugh Low Vindicates Ah Quee - Personal Letter From Hugh Low To Frederick Boyle attached in Letter From Boyle To Editor Harper's
# Hugh v. Higgs/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
21 U.S. 697
Hugh v. Higgs
This is an action on the case, brought to recover the money which the plaintiff in error had been decreed by a Court of Chancery to pay to the defendants in error. The defendant in the Court below contended, that an action at common law did not lie on a decree in Chancery, and excepted to the opinion of that Court, overruling this objection. It is admitted by the opposite counsel, that, in general, the action does not lie to recover money claimed under the decree of a Court of equity, but he supposed that, in this case, the money had been received by the defendant below, upon transactions which took place after the decree. Upon examining the record, we perceive that the money was in his hands, as trustee, at the time the order to pay it over was made.
An objection was also made to an opinion of the Circuit Court, upon another part of the case. There was an agreement between the parties, under seal, and having some relation to the money to which part of the claim relates, and the defendant below objected to the form of the action on that account. But we cannot discover, from the bill of exceptions, whether the money in contest was, or was not, received under that instrument. On that point, therefore, the Court gives no opinion. The judgment is to be reversed for error in the opinion of the Court below, which declares the action to be sustainable on the decretal order of the Court of Chancery, and the cause is remanded to the Circuit Court for further proceedings.
Judgment reversed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hughes

United States Supreme Court
114 U.S. 147
Hughes
John H. Mitchell, for petitioner.
J. N. Dolph, for respondent.
WALTE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Interstate Commerce Commission v. Columbus & Greenville Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
319 U.S. 551
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Columbus & Greenville Railway Company
Argued: May 13, 1943. --- Decided: June 7, 1943
See 320 U.S. --, 64 S.Ct. 26, 88 L.Ed. --.
Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton, of Washington, D.C., for appellant, Interstate Commerce Commission.
Mr. Elmer A. Smith, of Chicago, Ill., for appellants J. M. Kurn and other trustees.
Messrs. Robert C. Stovall, of Okolona, Miss., and Forrest B. Jackson, of Jackson, Miss., for appellee.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Interstate Commerce Commission v. Delaware Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
216 U.S. 531
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Delaware Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company
Argued: February 21 and 23, 1910. --- Decided: March 7, 1910
Solicitor General Bowers for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 531-533 intentionally omitted]
Mr. William S. Jenney for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 533-535 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Interstate Commerce Commission v. Diffenbaugh

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
222 U.S. 42
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Diffenbaugh
Argued: October 13 and 18, 1911. --- Decided: November 13, 1911
Solicitor General Lehmann and Mr. P. J. Farrell for the Interstate Commerce Commission.
Messrs. Maxwell Evarts, F. C. Dillard, and Henry W. Clark for Union P. R. Co.
Messrs. Frank Hagerman, John Barton Payne, and M. B. Koon for appellees.
Messrs. Robert Dunlap and Gardiner Lathrop for the Atchison, T. & S. F. R. co.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Interstate Commerce Commission v. Delaware, Lackawanna, & Western Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
220 U.S. 235
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Delaware, Lackawanna, & Western Railroad Company
Argued: February 25 and 28, 1911. --- Decided: April 3, 1911
Assistant to the Attorney General Ellis,
P. J. Farrell, and Edwin P. Grosvenor for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 235-237 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Mazzini Slusser for an appellant shipper.
Messrs. William S. Jenney and Walker D. Hines for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 237-240 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jones Eexecutrix v. Van Benthuysen

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
115 U.S. 464
Jones Eexecutrix v. Van Benthuysen
Argued: November 23, 1885. ---
Sol. Gen. Goode, for plaintiff in error.
J. D. Rouse and Wm. Grant, for defendant in error.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jones National Bank v. Yates

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
240 U.S. 541
Jones National Bank v. Yates
Argued: April 5 and 6, 1915. ---
Restored to docket for reargument June 21, 1915.
Reargued January 12 and 13, 1916.
Decided April 3, 1916.
Messrs. John Jacob Thomas, Lionel C. Burr, and Arthur B. Hayes for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Frank E. Bishop and Frank M. Hall for defendants in error Charles E. Yates and Louisa Hamer.
Messrs. Halleck F. Rose, John F. Stout, and Arthur R. Wells for defendant in error D. E. Thompson.
[Argument of Counsel from page 542 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation v. Gridiron Steel Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Wikipedia article
United States Supreme Court
382 U.S. 32
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation v. Gridiron Steel Company
The petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is granted, and the judgment dismissing petitioner's appeal to that court is reversed. The time limited by 28 U.S.C. § 2107 and Fed.Rule Civ.Proc. 73 for the filing of the notice of appeal from the judgment appealed from was 30 days. However, Fed.Rule Civ.Proc. 6(a), as amended, provides that in computing the period, '(t)he last day of the period so computed shall be included, unless it is a Saturday, a Sunday or a legal holiday, in which event the period runs until the end of the next day which is not a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday.' Since the thirtieth day following entry of the judgment appealed from way Saturday and the notice of appeal was filed the following Monday, we hold that the filing of the notice of appeal was timely. The provision of Rule 6(a) was not made inapplicable by the order of the Court of Appeals directing that the District Court Clerk's offices be open for business on Saturday mornings. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered.
Petition for certiorari granted, judgment dismissing appeal reversed, and case remanded for further proceedings.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jones Eexecutrix v. Van Benthuysen/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
115 U.S. 464
Jones Eexecutrix v. Van Benthuysen
Argued: November 23, 1885. ---
This suit was brought by Van Benthuysen, the defendant in error, a commission merchant engaged in the sale of manufactured tobacco, to recover back from Stockdale, a collector of internal revenue, certain taxes paid under protest on the amount of sales of tobacco in a bonded warehouse. The sole controversy is about the liability of the merchant to pay taxes upon the amount of revenue stamps affixed to the tobacco at the time of its removal from the warehouse. The case was here at the October term, 1880, and is reported in 103 U.S. 87. We then decided that he was 'not liable to be taxed for the revenue stamps required to be affixed to the tobacco before the removal thereof from a bonded warehouse, unless they were at the time of such sales so affixed, whereby they entered into the value of the tobacco and formed a part of the price thereof.' Under this ruling the judgment of the court below was reversed, and the cause sent back for a new trial. The present writ of error was brought for a review of the judgment upon the second trial. The bill of exceptions shows that the charge to the jury was almost in the exact language of the opinion of this court construing the law on which the rights of the parties depend, and it covered the whole case. Affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jacksonville Terminal Company v. Blackshear

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
296 U.S. 627
Jacksonville Terminal Company v. Blackshear
Mr. John O. Jackson, of Jacksonville, Fla., for petitioner.
For opinion below, see 162 So. 509.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jacksonville Terminal Company v. Blackshear/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
296 U.S. 627
Jacksonville Terminal Company v. Blackshear
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Florida Denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse