OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Statement by National Security Council Spokesperson Emily Horne on National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan’s Call with Prime Minister Andrej Plenkovic of Croatia

Published 2021-04-05
National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan spoke by phone today with Croatian Prime Minister Andrej Plenkovic. Mr. Sullivan expressed the Biden Administration’s appreciation for the strong U.S.-Croatia relationship and commitment to strengthening transatlantic ties. Mr. Sullivan congratulated the Prime Minister on Croatia’s recent inauguration of its KrK Island liquefied natural gas terminal and its progress on meeting the requirements to join the U.S. Visa Waiver Program. Mr. Sullivan and Prime Minister Plenkovic also discussed coordination on shared priorities, including the COVID-19 pandemic, energy diversification, and the Western Balkans.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Statement by National Security Council Spokesperson Emily Horne on National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan’s call with Karin Wallensteen, State Secretary to Prime Minister Stefan Löfven of Sweden

Published 2021-04-13
National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan spoke by phone today with Karin Wallensteen, State Secretary to Prime Minister Stefan Löfven of Sweden. Mr. Sullivan expressed the Biden Administration’s appreciation for the strong relationship between the United States and the Kingdom of Sweden, and he underscored the desire to further strengthen transatlantic ties. He thanked Ms. Wallensteen for Sweden’s leadership as Chairperson-in-Office of the OSCE. The two discussed their shared concerns over Russia’s sudden military build-up and provocations in occupied Crimea and on Ukraine’s borders. They discussed the critical role the OSCE is playing in conflict resolution efforts in Donbas, offering support for increased monitoring and reporting in response to Russia’s destabilizing moves. They agreed to work together on addressing the climate crisis, promoting democracy, and coordinating on shared foreign policy priorities, including achieving a ceasefire in Yemen and easing the human suffering there. Mr. Sullivan lauded Sweden’s actions to protect its critical communications infrastructure and its strong stance on China human rights abuses.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Statutory Order 50 (E)

Brings into force Indian Copyright Act (5th Amendment), 1999.
Layout 2
भारत $_{का}$ राजपत्र The Gazette of India
असाधारण EXTRAORDINARY
भाग II—खण्ड 1—उप-खण्ड ( ii ) PART II—Section 1—Sub-section (ii)
प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
(Department of Secondary Education and Higher Education)
(Book Promotion and Copyright Division)
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 13th January, 2000
S. O. 50(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (2) of Section 1 of the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1999 (49 of 1999), the Central Government hereby appoints the 15th day of January, 2000 as the date on which the said Act shall come into force.
[No. F 12-3/98-IC]
DR S. D. AWALE, Jt Educational Adviser (T)
This work is the work of Government of India. Section 52(1)(q) of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957 allows for the reproduction or publication of
* any matter which has been published in any Official Gazette except an Act of a Legislature;
* any Act of a Legislature subject to the condition that such Act is reproduced or published together with any commentary thereon or any other original matter;
* the report of any committee, commission, council, board or other like body appointed by the government if such report has been laid on the Table of the Legislature, unless the reproduction or publication of such report is prohibited by the government;
* any judgement or order of a court, Tribunal or other judicial authority, unless the reproduction or publication of such judgement or order is prohibited by the court, the Tribunal or other judicial authority, as the case may be.
The decision of the Supreme Court of India in "Eastern Book Company & Ors vs D.B. Modak & Anr" on 12 December, 2007 interpreted this section of the Act as making the material public domain.
This work is also in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Statutory Resolution (93) 26

* related portals: Multilateral documents.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Statutory Resolution (93) 26 on observer status

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Articles 15.a and 16 of the Statute of the Council of Europe;
Having regard to the Parliamentary Assembly's proposals for institutional reforms within the Council of Europe;
Bearing in mind the changed political situation in Europe and the world;
Convinced that this situation requires increased co-operation between the Council of Europe and non-member States sharing the Organisation's ideals and values;
Considering that an institutional framework should be given to such co-operation;
Considering that the provisions hereinafter set out are not inconsistent with the Statute of the Council of Europe;
Resolves as follows:
* Any State willing to accept the principles of democracy, the rule of law and of the enjoyment by all persons within its jurisdiction of human rights and fundamental freedoms, and wishing to co-operate with the Council of Europe may be granted by the Committee of Ministers, after consulting the Parliamentary Assembly, observer status with the Organisation.
* States enjoying observer status shall be entitled to send observers to those of the Council of Europe Committees of experts which were set up under Article 17 of the Statute and to which all member States are entitled to designate participants.
* States enjoying observer status shall be entitled, upon invitation by the host country, to send observers to conferences of specialised ministers.
* Decisions on inviting States enjoying observer status to participate in the activities of Partial, Enlarged or Enlarged Partial Agreements shall be taken in accordance with the rules applicable to the respective agreement.
* Observer status gives no right to be represented on the Committee of Ministers or the Parliamentary Assembly unless a specific decision has been taken by one of these organs on its own behalf.
* States enjoying observer status may appoint a permanent observer to the Council of Europe.
* An international intergovernmental organisation willing to co-operate closely with the Council of Europe and deemed able to make an important contribution to its work, may be granted by the Committee of Ministers, after consulting the Parliamentary Assembly, observer status with the rights set out in Articles II, III and IV for States enjoying observer status.
* AThe Committee of Ministers may suspend and, after consulting the Parliamentary Assembly, withdraw observer status.
# Staub v. City of Baxley

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, quotes, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
355 U.S. 313
Staub v. City of Baxley
Argued: Nov. 18, 19, 1957. --- Decided: Jan 13, 1958
Mr. Morris P. Glushien, New York City, for appellant.
Mr. J. H. Highsmith, Baxley, Ga., for appellee.
Mr. Justice WHITTAKER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Stay, ruby breasted warbler, stay

Written probably in 1814. First published in 1876.
Stay, ruby breasted warbler, stay
TUNE – “Julia to the Wood Robin”
1 Stay, ruby breasted warbler, stay, And let me see thy sparkling eye; Oh brush not yet the pearl strung spray, Nor bow thy pretty head to fly.
2 Stay while I tell thee, fluttering thing, That thou of love an emblem art; Yes! patient plume thy little wing, Whilst I my thoughts to thee impart.
3 When summer nights the dews bestow, And summer suns enrich the day, Thy notes the blossoms charm to blow, Each opes delighted at thy lay.
4 So when in youth the eye’s dark glance Speaks pleasure from its circle bright, The tones of love our joys enhance, And make superiour each delight.
5 And when bleak storms resistless rove, And ev’ry rural bliss destroy, Nought comforts then the leafless grove But thy soft note – its only joy.
6 E’en so the words of love beguile, When pleasure’s tree no longer bears, And draw a soft endearing smile, Amid the gloom of grief and tears.
# Statutory Resolution (93) 27

* related portals: Multilateral documents.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
COUNCIL OF EUROPE
COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS
________

## Statutory Resolution (93) 27 on majorities required for decisions of the Committee of Ministers

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Articles 15a and 16 of the Statute of the Council of Europe;
Having regard to the Parliamentary Assembly's proposals for institutional reforms within the Council of Europe;
Bearing in mind the increased membership of the Council of Europe and the need to strengthen the Organisation's capacity for action;
Considering it therefore desirable to reduce the number of cases where unanimity is required for decisions of the Committee of Ministers;
Considering that the provisions hereinafter set out are not inconsistent with the Statute of the Council of Europe;
Resolves as follows:
* Opening of Conventions and Agreements for signature Decisions on the opening for signature of Conventions and Agreements concluded within the Council of Europe shall be taken by a two-thirds majority of the representatives casting a vote and a majority of the representatives entitled to sit on the Committee, as set out in Article 20.d of the Statute.
* Partial Agreements In accordance with the Statutory Resolution on Partial and Enlarged Agreements decisions authorising certain member States to pursue an activity as a Partial Agreement shall be taken by a two-thirds majority of the representatives casting a vote and a majority of the representatives entitled to sit on the Committee, as set out in Article 20.d of the Statute.
# State Documents on Federal Relations/35

35. Connecticut on the Conscription Bill.
October Session, 1814.
Owing to the exigencies of the war, the administration in the fall of 1814 proposed the adoption of a conscription scheme, which was characterized by the opposition as grievously oppressive and unconstitutional. A bill, based upon the plan drawn by the Secretary of War, was introduced in Congres, and while still pending in the House of Representatives, the Legislature of Connecticut passed the following threatening resolutions. The conscription bill failed, but Congress adopted the Bill in regard to the Enlistment of Minors, December 10, 1814. (U. S. Stat. at Large, III, 146, 147.) in consequence of this act the Connecticut Legislature at the special session in January, 1815, passed An Act to secure the rights of Parents, Masters and Guardians, declaring the aforesaid act of Congress "repugnant to the spirit of the constitution of the United States, and an unauthorized interference with the laws and rights of this State," and requiring judges to discharge on habeas corpus all minors enlisted without the consent of their parents or guardians, subjecting to fine and imprisonment any person concerned in such enlistment who should remove any such minor out of the State. (Public Statute Law of Connecticut, Bk. II, ch. IV, 189, 190.) A similar law was enacted by Massachusetts, February 27, 1815. (Laws of Mass., 1812–15, 640, 641.)
References: The text is found in the Connecticut Courant, Hartford, November 15, 1814; also in Niles, VII, Sup. 107, 108; Dwight, 336, 337. For general account, see Adams, VIII, 265–280; Dwight, 309–337; Hildredth, VI, 529–534; 554; McMaster, IV, 240–246; V, 412.
And whereas the principles of the plan and bill aforesaid, are, in the opinion of this assembly, not only intolerably burdensome and oppressive, but utterly subversive of the rights anad liberties of the people of this state, and the freedom, sovereignty, and independence of the same, and inconsistent with the principles of the constitution of the United States.
And whereas it will become the imperious duty of the legislature of this state to exert themselves to ward off a blow so fatal to the liberties of a free people—
Resolved by this Assembly, That in case the plan and bill aforesaid, or any other bill on that subject, containing the principles aforesaid, shall be adopted, and assume the form of an act of Congress, the Governor of this state is hereby requested forthwith to convoke the General Assembly; and, to avoid delay, he is hereby authorized and requested to issue his proclamation, requiring the attendance of the members thereof at such time and
​place as he may appoint, to the end that opporunity may be given to consider what measures may be adopted to secure and preserve the rights and liberties of the people of this state, and the freedom, sovereignty and independence of the same.
# State Documents on Federal Relations/4

4. Act Declaratory of the Retained Sovereignty of the State.
Extracts from the Journal of the House of Representatives, Tuesday, November 19, 1793.
The House proceeded to resolve itself into a committee of the whole, to take under consideration a bill to be entitled an act declaratory of certain parts of the retained sovereignty of the State of Georgia—Mr. Speaker left the chair. Mr. McNeil took the chair of the committee—and some time being spent therein, Mr. Speaker resumed the chair, and Mr. McNeil from the committee of the whole reported that the committee had taken the said bill under consideration, had gone ​through the same, and had made several amendments thereto, which he reported.
And the bill as reported amended, being read, a motion was made by Mr. Waldburger to strike out the following section therein:
And be it further enacted, That any Federal Marshal, or any other person or persons levying, or attempting to levy, on the territory of this State, or any part thereof, or on the Treasury, or any other property belonging to the said State, or on the property of the Governor or Attorney General, or any of the people thereof, under or by virtue of any execution or other compulsory process issuing out of or by authority of the Supreme Court of the United States, or any other Court having jurisdiction under their authority, or which may at any period hereafter under the constitution of the said United States, as it now stands, be constituted, for, or in behalf of the before mentioned Alexander Chrisholm, Executor of Robert Farquhar, or for, or in behalf of, any other person or persons whatsoever, for the payment or recovery of any debt, or pretended debt, or claim, against the said State of Georgia, shall be, and he or they attempting to levy as aforesaid are hereby declared to be guilty of felony, and shall suffer death, without the benefit of clergy, by being hanged.
And on the question for striking out as aforesaid, the yeas and nays being required, are as follows:
Yeas. Messrs. Barnett, Burnett, Carnes, Fort, R. Jones, J. Jones of Chatham, Waldburger, and Winn—8.
Nays. Messrs. Barrow, Early, Greer, Howell, Hardin, Harris, J. Jones of Burke, G. Jones, Jack, Kemp, Lanier, M'Neil, Rutherford, Simms, Stuart, Walker, Watkins, Worsham, and Wilkinson—19. So the motion was lost.
Ordered, That the bill be engrossed for a third reading.
Extracts from the Journal of the House of Representatives, Thursday, November 21, 1793:
* * * A bill to be entitled an act declaratory of certain parts of the retained sovereignty of the State of Georgia was read the third time.
And on motion made—Resolved, That the bill be inserted at full length on the journals of this House.
​Resolved, That the bill do pass under the title of "An act declaratory of certain parts of the retained sovereignty of the State of Georgia."
Ordered, That the clerk do carry the same to the Senate and desire their concurrence.
# State Documents on Federal Relations/37

The letter sent by the legislature of Massachusetts to nearby states, calling them to send delegates to the Hartford Convention.
37. Call of the Convention.
Circular Letter to the Governors of the New England States on a Convention to be holden at Hartford, which his Excellency the Governor is requested to transmit.
17th October, 1814.
Sir,
Your Excellency will herewith receive certain resolutions of the Legislature of Massachusetts, which you are respectfully requested to take the earliest occasion to lay before the Legislature of your State, together with this letter, which is intended as an invitation to them to appoint Delegates, if they shall deem it expedient, to meet such others as may be appointed by this and other States at the time and place expressed in these resolutions.
​The general objects of the proposed conference are first, to deliberate upon the dangers to which the Eastern section of the Union is exposed by the course of the war, and which there is too much reason to believe will thicken round them in its progress, and to devise, if practicable, means of security and defence, which may be consistent with the preservation of their resources from total ruin and adapted to their local situation, mutual relations and habits, and not repugnant to their obligations as members of the Union.
When convened for this object, which admits not of delay, it seems also expedient to submit to their consideration, the enquiry, whether the interests of these States demand that persevering endeavours be used by each of them to procure such amendments to be affected in the national constitution as may secure to them equal advantages; and whether, if in their judgment, this should be deemed impracticable under the existing provisions for amending that instrument, an experiment may be made without disadvantage to the nation, for obtaining a Convention from all the States in the Union, or such of them as may approve of the measure, with a view to obtain such amendment.
It cannot be necessary to anticipate objections to the measure which may arise from jealousy or fear. This Legislature is content, for its justification to repose upon the purity of its own motives, and upon the known attachment of its constituents to the national union, and to the rights and independence of their country.
Read and accepted in both Houses, and thereupon
Resolved, That his Excellency the Governor be requested to transmit letters of the foregoing form, signed by the President of the Senate and Speaker of the House of Representatives, to the several Governors of the States of New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Vermont, and also a copy of the resolutions to which it refers, with a request that the same may be laid before the Legislatures of their several States.
[Resolves of Massachusetts, 1814, 570, 571.]
# State Documents on Federal Relations/36n

Massachusetts and the Call of the Hartford Convention.
October, 1814.
During the summer of 1814 New England, which hitherto had been spared by the British, was threatened with a general invasion, and the enemy actually occupied a portion of the Maine coast. The Federal Government still left New England to defend herself, and withheld supplies for the maintenance of the militia. In this crisis, Governor Strong, of Massachusetts, assembled the General Court in Special Session, October 5, 1814. That body acted promptly, passing an act authorizing the raising of a military corps of ten thousand men for the defence of the State (Laws of Mass., 1812–15, 575–578), and adopting the Report and Resolutions of its Committee, recommending the assembling of a Convention of Delegates of the New England States, thus acting on the suggestion first proposed by the Joint Committee in their Report in the preceding February. (Cf. Ante, No. 34.) The minority in both the Senate and the House filed protests. Extracts from the Report and the Call for the Convention to be held in Hartford, December 15, 1814, follow.
References: Sources. The texts are in Resolves of Mass., 1814, 567–571; also in Niles, VII, 149–153; the Circular Letter is in Dwight, 342, 343. For other documents including the Protests of the Minority of the Senate and of the House, cf. Niles, VII, 113, 114, 148–155, 180, 181. Report and Resolution of the General Assembly of Connecticut appointing seven delegates to the Convention is in Dwight, 344–350; also in Niles, VII, 164, 165. In the Connecticut Historical Society there are two contemporary prints of the same; the one, To the Honorable the General Assembly, now in Session. Large folio, broadside. (New Haven: Hudson and Woodward, 1814), attested in ink by Thomas Day, Secretary of State; the other, Report | Of the Committee | To whom was referred His | Excellency's Speech, etc. | Hudson & Woodward, Printers, | Church Street, New Haven. | Octavo. pp. 8. The text of the report and resolutions of Rhode Island, which follow, are also found in Niles, VII, 180, 181. The report adopted by the Vermont Legislature, although Federalist, that it was inexpedient to accept the invitation, is given in Assembly Journal of 1814, 76, 84, 129; Records of Governor and Council, VI, 94, 463. Letter of Madison, on conduct of New England ​States, Nov. 25, 1814, Works, II, 593. General references: Adams, VIII, 222–228; Dwight, 337–351; Hildreth, VI, 531–535; McMaster, IV, 246–248; Schouler, II, 424, 425; Von Hoist, 258–262.
# She

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
First serialised in The Graphic magazine from October 1886 to January 1887. The story is a first-person narrative that follows the journey of Horace Holly and his ward Leo Vincey to a lost kingdom in the African interior. There they encounter a primitive race of natives and a mysterious white queen named Ayesha who reigns as the all-powerful "She", or "She-who-must-be-obeyed". In this work, Rider Haggard developed the conventions of the Lost World subgenre, which many later authors emulated. Warning: template has been deprecated.
SHE
A HISTORY OF ADVENTURE
BY
H. RIDER HAGGARD
AUTHOR OF 'KING SOLOMON'S MINES' 'DAWN' 'THE WITCH'S HEAD' ETC.
IN EARTH AND SKIE AND SEA STRANGE THINGES THER BE
Doggerel couplet from the Shard of Amenartas
LONDON LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO. 1887
All rights reserved
I INSCRIBE THIS HISTORY TO ANDREW LANG
IN TOKEN OF PERSONAL REGARD AND OF MY SINCERE ADMIRATION FOR HIS LEARNING AND HIS WORKS

### Contents

* Introduction
* I: My Visitor
* II: The Years Roll By
* III: The Sherd of Amenartas
* IV: The Squall
* V: The Head of the Ethiopian
* VI: An Early Christian Ceremony
* VII: Ustane Sings
* VIII: The Feast, and After!
* IX: A Little Foot
* X: Speculations
* XI: The Plain of Kôr
* XII: "She"
* XIII: Ayesha Unveils
* XIV: A Soul in Hell
* XV: Ayesha Gives Judgment
* XVI: The Tombs of Kôr
* XVII: The Balance Turns
* XVIII: "Go, Woman!"
* XIX: "Give Me a Black Goat!"
* XX: Triumph
* XXI: The Dead and Living Meet
* XXII: Job Has a Presentiment
* XXIII: The Temple of Truth
* XXIV: Walking the Plank
* XXV: The Spirit of Life
* XXVI: What We Saw
* XXVII: We Leap
* XXVIII: Over the Mountain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1925, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 98 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse