OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Morgan v. Town Clerk/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
74 U.S. 610
Morgan v. Town Clerk
On the 9th of January, 1861, the plaintiff in error recovered a judgment against the defendant in error for $1540 damages, and for costs. The cause of action was overdue interest coupons attached to bonds issued by the town of Beloit in payment of its subscription to the stock of the Racine, Janesville, and Mississippi Railroad Company, pursuant to chapter 12 of the local and private laws of Wisconsin, passed in 1853. The plaintiff in error instituted the proceedings in the court below to obtain a writ of mandamus, directed to the town clerk of the defendant, commanding him to assess the amount necessary to pay the judgment and interest, upon the taxable property of the town, and to place the assessment upon the next assessment and tax roll for collection. A statute of Wisconsin forbids the issuing of an execution against a town, and expressly prescribes this mode of procedure.
Ample authority to issue the writ is given by the statute. The proceedings on the part of the plaintiff in error are in all things in strict conformity to its requirements. The power of the Circuit Court to issue writs of mandamus to State officers in proper cases is no longer an open question in this court; and it has been repeatedly held to be an appropriate remedy in the class of cases, to which the one lying at the foundation of this proceeding belongs. We learn from the record that the court below denied the writ upon the ground that the statute under which the bonds were issued, provided that the requisite tax should be levied by the supervisors of the town, and that this remedy was exclusive of all others. There are several obvious answers to this view of the subject. We deem it sufficient to advert to one of them. In the case of Bushnell v. Gates, this precise question, arising under the same circumstances, came before the Supreme Court of Wisconsin. It was held that the objection was untenable, that the statute authorizing the writ to go against the town clerk applied to the case, and that it was conclusive. If there could otherwise have been any doubt upon the question, this determination by the highest court of the State giving a construction to the statute under consideration, is unanswerable. We need not further consider the subject.
The judgment below is REVERSED. A mandate will be sent to the Circuit Court, directing that an order be entered in the case
IN CONFORMITY WITH THIS OPINION.

## Notes

* ↑ Ch. 15, § 77, Revised Statutes of 1858, p. 186.
* ↑ The Commissioners of Knox Co. v. Aspinwall, 24 Howard, 376; Von Hoffman v. The City of Quincy, 4 Wallace, 535; Riggs v. Johnson County, 6 Id. 166.
* ↑ Not yet reported.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Morales v. City of Galveston (364 U.S. 295)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
364 U.S. 295
Morales v. City of Galveston
Arthur J. Mandell, for petitioners.
Preston Shirley, for respondent City of Galveston.
Byron F. Williams, for respondent Cardigan Shipping Co., Ltd.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Morales v. City of Galveston (364 U.S. 295)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
364 U.S. 295
Morales v. City of Galveston
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for consideration in light of Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc., 362 U.S. 539, 80 S.Ct. 926, 4 L.Ed.2d 941.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Morales v. New York

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 102
Morales v. New York
Argued: Nov. 20, 1969. --- Decided: Dec 8, 1969
Richard T. Farrell, Brooklyn, N.Y., for petitioner.
Burton B. Roberts, New York City, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Moralia

Although written in Greek as the Ἠθικά (Ēthiká, "Ethics"), the work is generally known by its Latin name Moralia or by an English translation of it: the Morals or Moral Essays. The "work" covers many diverse topics, since it is used as a catch-all for any of Plutarch's surviving works or fragments apart from the biographies and biographical comparisons that make up his Lives.
English-language translations of Ἠθικά include:

## Full versions

* Plutarch's Morals (1878), a revision of the 1684 translation edited by William W. Goodwin (external scan)
* Plutarch's Miscellanies and Essays (1909), a revision of Goodwin's edition by A.H. Clough (external scans (multiple parts): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
* Plutarch's Moralia (1914 & seq.), translated by various authors for the Loeb Classical Library (external scan)

### Abridgments

* Plutarch's Moralia: Twenty Essays (1603, rev. 1911), translated & abridged by Philemon Holland
* Plutarch's Morals: Ethical Essays (1898), translated & abridged by Arthur Richard Shilleto (external scan)

## External links

* A variety of translations at Attalus
# Morales v. City of Galveston (370 U.S. 165)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
370 U.S. 165
Morales v. City of Galveston
Argued: April 23 and 24, 1962. --- Decided: June 11, 1962
Arthur J. Mandell, Houston, Tex., for petitioners.
Preston Shirley, Galveston, Tex., for respondent, City of Galveston.
Edward W. Watson, Galveston, Tex., for respondent, Cardigan Shipping Company, Ltd.
Mr. Justice STEWART delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Morales v. City of Galveston (370 U.S. 165)/Dissent Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Douglas
United States Supreme Court
370 U.S. 165
Morales v. City of Galveston
Argued: April 23 and 24, 1962. --- Decided: June 11, 1962
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice BLACK concur, dissenting.
The District Court found that the libellants were injured in 1957 as a result of a release into the hold of a 'shot' of grain that completely closed the hatch opening, which was the only source of ventilation for the hold in which they were working. This grain had been treated by chemicals for weevil infestation; and the noxious fumes from those chemicals injured libellants.
The vessel's cargo spaces were not equipped with a forced ventilation system. Grain vessels, the District Court found, rarely are so equipped; and it concluded that forced ventilation is 'not necessary or customary.' If this were an isolated instance of fumigated grain releasing noxious gases, no claim of unseaworthiness could be maintained. But this was not an isolated instance. Of the wheat loaded through this elevator, some 8 to 10% was fumigated by the city. Wheat is commonly fumigated either in the elevators or in railroad cars. When the fumigant is properly applied, the gases and fumes are dissipated so as not to be dangerous or harmful after 24 to 48 hours. The District Court found, however, that to the knowledge of the owners of the vessel several recent incidents like that in the present case had occurred in Galveston, causing injury to longshoremen-one in 1949, one in 1950, two in 1953.
A vessel without a forced ventilation system would be seaworthy if this injury were an unexpected, isolated occurrence. But I agree with Judge Rives of the Court of Appeals that the vessel and her appurtenances were not 'reasonably fit for their intended use' (291 F.2d 97, 99), where up to 10% of the grain loaded from this elevator was fumigated and where the owners had knowledge of like accidents. One 'intended service' of this vessel was, therefore, the loading of fumigated grain which in the past had given off noxious fumes. Unseaworthiness by reason of the absence of a forced ventilation system is clearer here than it was in Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc., 362 U.S. 539, 80 S.Ct. 926, 4 L.Ed.2d 941, where temporary slime and gurry on the ship's rail rendered it unseaworthy. The unseaworthy condition in the present case had no such temporary span. What happened here shows that the vessel was unseaworthy whenever fumigated grain was being loaded.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Moran v. City of New Orleans

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
112 U.S. 69
Moran v. City of New Orleans
J. R. Beckwith, for plaintiff in error.
C. F. Buck and S. P. Blanc, for defendant in error.
The city of New Orleans was authorized by a law of the state, (Acts Extra Session 1870, p. 37, § 12,) for the purposes of the act, 'to levy, impose, and collect a license upon all persons pursuing any trade, profession, or calling, and to provide for its collection; and said license shall not be constituted to be a tax on property.'
The same act (section 21) provides that 'all licenses imposed by the city, not paid on the thirty-first day of July, shall be seizable, after thirty days' publication in the official journal,' in certain courts of record in the city; 'and upon the prayer of the city, through its proper representatives, any court of competent jurisdiction shall enjoin the said person or persons so liable to pay a license tax, and who shall refuse or neglect to pay the same, from continuing to carry on such business or profession until he shall have paid the same, and all costs and charges for the recovery and enforcement of the claim therefor.'
The council of the city of New Orleans passed an ordinance 'to establish the rate of licenses for professions, callings, and other business for the year 1880,' which assessed and directed to be collected the sums specially set forth; among others: 'Sec. 39. Every member of a firm or company, every agency, person, or corporation, owning and running tow-boats to and from the Gulf of Mexico, five hundred dollars. Every member of a firm or company, every agent, person, or corporation, owning and running job-boats within the corporate limits, fifty dollars.'
Joseph Cooper was the owner of two steam-propellers, each measuring over 100 tons, duly enrolled and licensed at the port of New Orleans, under the laws of the United States, to be employed in the coasting trade, and employed them as tow-boats in taking vessels from the sea up the river to New Orleans, and from that port to the sea. The city of New Orleans brought its action against him in the third district court for the parish of Orleans, to recover the license tax under the ordinance, and obtained a judgment in its favor, which, on appeal, was affirmed by the supreme court of the state.
Mr. J. R. Beckwith for plaintiff in error.
Mr. S.P. Blanc and Mr. C.F. Buck for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 70-71 intentionally omitted]
MATTHEWS, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Meynell, Edgar John

​Meynell, Edgar John, judge of county courts (circuit No. 2) since 1873, recorder of Doncaster since 1870, J.P. Durham, went the Northern circuit, a student of the Middle Temple 20 April, 1849, called to the bar 7 May, 1852 (3rd son of Thomas Meynell, Esq., of Kilvington Hall, Yorks); born 1 Feb., 1825; married 5 Aug., 1856, Maria Louisa, youngest dau. of late Richard Samuel Short, Esq., of Edlington, co. Lincoln, and has issue (see Foster's Yorkshire Collection).
    The Fryerage, Yarm, Kilvington Hall, Thirsk; Old Elvet, Durham.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Meyricke, Robert Henry

​Meyricke, Robert Henry, M.A., St. John's Coll., Camb., 1868, a student of the Inner Temple 10 Jan., 1865 (then aged 21), called to the bar 27 Jan., 1868 (3rd son of Rev. Robert Meyricke, of Dinham Lodge, Ludlow); born , 1844; married 2 April, 1884, Kate Carswell, only dau. of late James Clerk, Esq., of Glasgow.
    7, Porchester Square, W.; 7, Stone Buildings, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Methold, Thomas Tindal

​Methold, Thomas Tindal, B.A., Trin. Hall, Camb., 1860, a student of Lincoln's Inn 3 Nov., 1859 (then aged 21), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1862 (eldest son of Henry Methold, Esq., of London); born 24 Jan., 1838; mamed 25 Aug., 1864, Mary Ellen, eldest dau. of late Rev. Edward James, vicar of Hindringham, Norfolk, and has issue.
    7, Ashburn Place, Cromwell Road, S.W.; 13, Old Square, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Mew, James

​Mew, James, B.A. Wadham Coll., Oxon, a member of the South-eastern circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 17 Jan., 1859 (then aged 22), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1864 (only son of George Mew, Esq., of Surrey Square, London); born , 1837.
    3, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Meynell, Edgar, jun.

​Meynell, Edgar, jun., matric. London Univ. 1879 from the Oratory, Edgbaston, a student of the Middle Temple 18 May, 1881, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1884 (eldest son of His Honour Edgar John Meynell, of Durham, county court judge); born 6 Sept., 1859 (see Foster's Yorkshire Collection).
    Old Elvet, Durham
# Men-at-the-Bar/Mew, George

​Mew, George, a student of the Middle Temple 5 Jan., 1841, called to the bar 12 Jan., 1844 (eldest son of William Mew, of Apton Hall, Essex, gent.); born , .
# Men-at-the-Bar/Metcalfe, William James

​Metcalfe, William James, Q.C, M.A., judge of county courts (circuit No. 54) since 1879, recorder of Norwich since 1874, of Ipswich 1866-74, M.A., St. John's Coll., Camb., 1845, president of Bristol Law Student Society, a student of the Inner Temple 22 April, 1842 (then aged 24), called to the bar 2 May, 1845, Q.C. 3 Feb., 1873 (eldest son of Rev. William J. Metcalfe, rector of Foulmire, co. Camb.); born , 1818; married 1st, 13 May, 1848, Georgina, 3rd dau. of George Austin, Esq., of Hornsey; she died , 1855; he married 2ndly, 22 Nov., 1859, Agnes Mary, widow of Major Newall, dau. of Thomas Vaughan, Esq., co. Galway; she died , 1874.
    Cambria House, Whiteladies' Road, Clifton, Bristol.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Metge, Robert Henry

​Metge, Robert Henry, M.P. co. Meath 1880-4, LL.B., Trin. Coll., Dublin, 1871, B.A. 1870, J.P. co. Meath, a student of the Middle Temple 11 Jan., 1870, called to the bar 30 April, 1873 (3rd son of John Charles Metge, of Sion House, co. Meath, J.P., dec.); born , 1850; married , 1874, Fanny Thomasina Virginia, dau. of Rev. Charles James Lambart, late rector of Navan, co. Meath, and has issue (see Foster's Peerage, E. Cavan).
    Athlumney, Navan, co. Meath.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Methuen, Rev. Thomas Plumptre

​Methuen, Rev. Thomas Plumptre, M.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1839, a student of Lincoln's Inn 4 Nov., 1836 (then aged 22), called to the bar 30 Jan., 1840 (eldest son of Rev. Thomas Anthony Methuen, rector of All Cannings, Wilts, dec.); born 14 Aug., 1814; married 17 June, 1840, Matilda Gertrude, elder dau. and co-heir of Lord Edward O'Brien (3rd son of Murrough, Marquis of Thomond), and has issue (see Foster's Peerage, B. Methuen).
    7, Somerset Place, Bath.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Mews, John

​Mews, John, LL.M., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1880, LL.B. 1877 (1st class in law tripos 1876), a member of the South-eastern circuit, editor of A Common Law Digest 1756-1883, a student of the Middle Temple 16 April, 1875, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1878 (son of John Mews, of London, deputy chairman Surrey sessions); born , ; married , 1879.
    43, Gloucester Gardens, Hyde Park, W.; 1, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.
# My Climbs in the Alps and Caucasus (1908)

MY CLIMBS IN THE ALPS AND CAUCASUS
UNIFORM WITH THIS VOLUME.
| THE GREAT BOER WAR. | Arthur Conan Doyle. |
| COLLECTIONS AND RECOLLECTIONS. | G. W. E. Russell. |
| REMINISCENCES. | Sir Henry Hawkins. |
| LIFE OF LORD RUSSELL OF KILLOWEN | R.Barry O'Brien. |
| FROM THE CAPE TO CAIRO. | E. S. Grogan. |
| A BOOK ABOUT THE GARDEN. | Dean Hole. |
| WITH KITCHENER TO KHARTUM. | G. W. Sttevens. |
| THE UNVEILING OF LHASA. | Edmund Candler. |
| LIFE OF LORD DUFFERIN. | Sir A. Lyall. |
| SPURGEON'S SERMONS. | Sir W. Robertson Nicoll, LL.D. |
| SIR FRANK LOCKWOOD. | Augustine Birrell, K.C., M.P. |
| THE MAKING OF A FRONTIER. | Colonel Durand. |
| POT-POURRI FROM A SURREY GARDEN. | Mrs. Earle. |
| LIFE OF RICHARD COBDEN. | Lord Morley. |
| LIFE OF PARNELL. | R. Barry O'Brien. |
| HAVELOCK'S MARCH. | J. W. Sherer. |
| MEMORIES GRAVE AND GAY. | Dr. John Kerr. |
| LIFE OF DANTON. | Hilaire Belloc. |
| A BOOK ABOUT ROSES. | S. Reynolds Hole. |
| RANDOM REMINISCENCES. | Charles Brookjield. |
| THE LONDON POLICE COURTS. | Thomas Holmes. |
| THE AMATEUR POACHER. | Richard Jefferies. |
| AT THE WORKS. | Lady Bell. |
| MEXICO AS I SAW IT. | Mrs. Alec Tweedie. |
| THROUGH THE HEART OF PATAGONIA. | H. Htsketh Prichard. |
| PARIS TO NEW YORK BY LAND. | Harry de Windt. |
| LIFE OF LEWIS CARROLL. | Stuart Dodg-son Collingwood. |
| A NATURALIST IN THE GUIANAS. | Eugine André. |
| THE MANTLE OF THE EAST. | Edmund Candler. |
| LETTERS OF DR. JOHN BROWN. | |
| JUBILEE BOOK OF CRICKET. | Prince Ranjitsinhji. |
| BY DESERT WAYS TO BAGHDAD. | Louisa Jebb. |
| SOME OLD LOVE STORIES. | T. P. O'Connor. |
| FIELDS, FACTORIES, & WORKSHOPS. | Prince Kropotkin. |
| LIFE OF LORD LAWRENCE. | R. Bosworth Smith. |
| PROBLEMS OF POVERTY. | Dr. Chalmers. |
| THE BURDEN OF THE BALKANS. | M. E. Durham. |
| LIFE AND LETTERS OF LORD MACAULAY.— I. & II. | Sir George O. Trevelyan, Bart. |
| WHAT I SAW IN RUSSIA. | Hon. Maurice Baring. |
| WILD ENGLAND OF TO-DAY. | C. J. Cornish. |
| LEAVES FROM AN INSPECTOR'S LOGBOOK. | Dr. John Kerr. |
| THROUGH FINLAND IN CARTS. | Mrs. Alec TWeedie. |
| THE VOYAGE OF THE "DISCOVERY."— I. & II. | Captain Scott. |
| FELICITY IN FRANCE. | Constance E. Maud. |
| Etc., etc. ||
| Others to Follow. ||
My Climbs in the Alps and Caucasus
BY
A. F. MUMMERY
WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY MRS. MUMMERY
AND AN APPRECIATION BY J. A. HOBSON
THOMAS NELSON & SONS
LONDON, EDINBURGH, DUBLIN
AND NEW YORK
CONTENTS.
PAGE
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Silvester, John

​Silvester, John, jun., M.A. Queen's Coll., Oxon, B.A. 1868, a student of Lincoln's Inn 13 April, 1869, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1872 (eldest son of John Silvester, Esq., of Froxfield, Hants); born , .
    Slade House, Froxfield, Petersfield, Hants.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Simon, John

​Simon, John, serjeant-at-law, M.P. Dewsbury since 1868, LL.B., Univ. Coll., London, 1841, and a member of Convocation, also a member of the Northern circuit, of the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting, and of the council of the Society for Codification of International Law, a student of the Middle Temple 29 Oct., 1839, called to the bar 4 Nov., 1842, serjeant-at-law 15 April, 1864, patent of precedence Jan., 1868 (only son of Isaac Simon, of Montego Bay, Jamaica, merchant); born 9 Dec., 1818; married 12 June, 1843, Rachel, 5th dau. of Simeon K. Salaman, Esq., of London, and has issue.
    36, Tavistock Square, W.C.; 1, Dr. Johnson's Buildings, Temple, E.C.; Reform and Cobden Clubs.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Sillem, Stewart Augustus

​Sillem, Stewart Augustus, B.A., Brasenose Coll., Oxon, 1883, a student of the Inner Temple 19 Jan., 1882 (then aged 20), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1884 (3rd son of Augustus Sillem, of Sydenham); born , 1862.
    Laurie Park, Sydenham.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Sills, George

​Sills, George, M.A., St. John's Coll., Camb., 1864, a revising barrister on the Midland circuit, author of a treatise on The Bankruptcy Act 1869, On the Agricultural Holdings Act 1875, a student of Lincoln's Inn 15 Nov., 1852 (then aged 20), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1858 (2nd son of William Sills, Esq., late of Casthorpe, co. Lincoln, dec.); born , 1832; married 8 Oct., 1864, Caroline Mary, eldest dau. of Frederick William Caldwell, Esq., of London.
    Amersham Road, Putney, S.W.; 5, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Silvester, Ernest Frederick

​Silvester, Ernest Frederick, M.A. (honours), Univ. Coll., Oxon, 1878, educated at Repton School, a student of the Inner Temple 5 April, 1870 (then aged 21), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1874 (eldest son of Henry Edward Silvester, of Beverley, Yorks, solicitor); born 26 Oct., 1848; married 22 Aug., 1878, Agnes Graham, dau. of David George Stow, Esq., of Glasgow and Bridge of Allan.
    Devonshire Lodge, Maidenhead; 3, Mitre Court, Temple; E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Sim, James Duncan Stuart

​Sim, James Duncan Stuart, B. A., Trin. Hall, Camb., 1874, a student of the Inner Temple 10 June, 1871 (then aged 21), called to the bar 30 April, 1875 (eldest son of James Duncan Sim, C.S.I., member of council Madras); born , 1850.
    4, Harcourt Buildings, or 11, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Simmonds, John

​Simmonds, John, M.A., Jesus Coll., Camb., 1854, LL.D. London Univ. 1857, and a member of Convocation, a student of the Inner Temple 16 April, 1852 (then aged 23), certificate of honour Jan., 1855, called to the bar 30 April, 1855 (eldest son of Joseph Wilkes Simmonds, of Ashby-de-la-Zouch, co. Leic.); born , 1829; married 18 Feb., 1862, Isabella Emily, only surviving dau. of A. B. Barnes, Esq., of London.
    Bishopswood Road, Highgate, N.; 5, New Square, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Sieveking, Arthur Gustavus

​Sieveking, Arthur Gustavus, M.A., Caius Coll., Camb., 1881, a student of the Inner Temple 10 April, 1877 (then aged 22), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1880 (3rd son of Edward Henry Sieveking, of London, M.D.); born , 1855.
    8, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Sim, Archibald Coysgarne

​Sim, Archibald Coysgarne, B.A., New Coll., Oxon, 1877, Law Times reporter in Justice Chitty's court, a student of the Inner Temple 23 March, 1876 (then aged 20), called to the bar 25 June, 1879 (3rd son of Alexander Sim, Esq., of Harrow Weald Park, Middlesex); born 14 Oct., 1855.
    21, Old Square, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Sim, Frederick William

​Sim, Frederick William, M.A. Christ Church, Oxon, B.A. 1872, a member of the South-eastern circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 21 April, 1870 (then aged 22), called to the bar 30 April, 1874 (youngest son of John Coysgarne Sim, Esq., of Coombe Wood, Surrey); born , 1848.
    Coombe Wood, Kingston-on-Thames.
# My Life and other Stories

* My Life
* The House with the Mezzanine
* Typhus
* Gooseberries
* In Exile
* The Lady with the Toy Dog
* Goussiev
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.