OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Poets of John Company/A Scene in the Doab

EMMA ROBERTS.
1794—1804.
A Scene in the Doab.
In tangled depths the jungles spread Around the solitary scene, The lurking panther's sullen tread Marks the wild paths of the ravine;
Here too the fierce hyena prowls. Haunting the dark jheel's broad lagoon; And here, at eve, the wolf-cub howls, And famished jackals bay the moon.
A crumbling mosque—a ruined fort— Hastening alike to swift decay, Where owls and vampire bats resort. And vultures hide them from the day,
Alone remain to tell the tale Of Moslem power, and Moslem pride, When shouts of conquest filled the gale And swords in native blood were dyed.
They sleep—the slayer and the slain— A lowly grave the victor shares With the weak slave who wore the chain None save a craven spirit wears.
Yet had the deeds which they have done Lived in the poet's deathless song, These nameless sepoys would have won All that to valour's hopes belong
They brought their faith from distant lands, They reared the Moslem badge on high, And swept away with reeking brands The reliques of idolatry.
Their wreaths have faded—lizards bask Upon the marble pavement, where, 'Twas erst the dark-eyed beauty's task To crown with flowers her raven hair.
Unheeded now the scorpion crawls, And snakes unscathed in silence glide. Where once the bright Zenana's halls To woman's feet were sanctified.
No trace remains of those gay hours When lamps, in golden radiance bright. Streamed o'er these now deserted towers The sunshine of their perfumed light.
The maiden's song, the anklet's bells So sweetly ringing o'er the floor, And eyes as soft as the gazelle's Are heard, and seen, and felt no more.
Now all is silent; the wild cry Of savage beasts alone is heard, Or wrathful tempest hurrying by, Or moanings of some desert bird.
# Popular Science Monthly/Volume 59/May 1901/Obituary of William Jay Youmans

Layout 4
The death of Dr. William Jay Youmans is a personal loss not only to his many friends, but also to the thousands of those who knew him only as editor of this journal. Youmans was born near Saratoga on October 14, 1838, and the boyhood on his father's farm gave him the training which has so often led to the elevation of public and professional life in this country. He was descended, as his name witnesses, from the British Yeomanry, and the sterling stock that settled in New England was typified in his person and character. He loved his home in the country, and had purchased a farm nearby, to which it was his intention to retire to pass the years of rest that he had so well earned. After leaving the home farm at the age of seventeen, Youmans studied under his brother, the late Dr. E. L. Youmans, and later at Yale, Columbia and New York Universities, and in London under Huxley. He practised medicine for several years in Minnesota, and in 1872 joined his brother in New York to establish the Popular Science Monthly. For twenty-eight years his life was devoted to this journal, first in association with his brother—who was seventeen years the older, and died in 1887—and afterwards as editor-in-chief. The two brothers not only edited the journal, but as advisers of the house of Appleton, gave them their high standing as publishers of scientific books in the renaissance of science based on the doctrine of evolution. The teachings of Spencer, Darwin and other great leaders were for them a religion to which their lives were consecrated. Their influence through this journal and other publications of the Appletons was great and permanent. Youmans died at Mount Vernon on April 10 from typhoid fever, after a ten days' illness. His life was devoted with rare singleness of purpose to the diffusion of science; it was a privilege to know him; he was gentle, kind and noble.
STANISLAUS RESERVATION.
# Popular Science Monthly/Volume 42/February 1893/Obituary Notes

Layout 4
Sir Richard Owen, one of the most famous comparative anatomists of the age, died in London, December 18, 1892, in the eighty-ninth year of his age. A full sketch of his life and work was published, with portrait, in The Popular Science Monthly, Vol. XXIII, No. 1 (May, 1883).
Mr. W. Mattieu Williams, author of the series of articles on The Chemistry of Cooking, published in the Monthly a few years ago, died suddenly at his home in Neasden, England, November 28, 1892. The book by which he was best known is The Fuel of the Sun. Much of his work was contributed to serial publications, and a volume of his popular essays was issued several years ago under the title of Science in Short Chapters. His Through Norway with a Knapsack called attention to the advantages of Norway as a summer resort for tourists.
Dr. E. W. Siemens, a distinguished German engineer and electrician, died in Berlin, December 6, 1892. He was born at Leuthe, in Hanover, in 1816, taught in the Lubeck gymnasium, joined the Prussian artillery in 1837, and withdrew from the service of the Government in 1850 and devoted himself to scientific studies and private enterprises. He was the inventor of many of the most valuable practical applications of electricity and of devices in electrical apparatus, instituted the Siemens quicksilver unit, contributed much to the successful establishment of the electric railway, and devised the pneumatic dispatch system and the Siemens alcoholimeter.
Prof. John S. Newberry, of Columbia College, died in New Haven, Conn., December 7, 1892, after a long illness. He suffered an attack of paralysis in December, 1890, from which he never fully recovered, and which left him with a gradually failing mind. A sketch of his life and scientific work—chiefly in geology, in which he was one of the most eminent American experts—was given in The Popular Science Monthly, Vol. IX, No. 4, August, 1876. He received the Murchison medal from the Geological Society of London in 1888.
# Poker

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Poker."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Poker," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* Poker (1909), in Hoyle's Games Modernized
* Poker! (1931), play by Zora Neale Hurston
# Pokora v. Wabash Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
292 U.S. 98
Pokora v. Wabash Railway Company
Argued: March 8, 9, 1934. --- Decided: April 2, 1934
Mr. Wm. St. J. Wines, of Springfield, Ill., for petitioner.
Mr. Homer Hall, of St. Louis, Mo., for respondent.
Mr. Justice CARDOZO delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Poland

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Poland."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, travel guide, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Poland", a poem by Gilbert Keith Chesterton
* "Poland", a poem by Sergey Mitrofanovich Gorodetsky
* "Poland", a hymn tune by Thomas Koschat

### Encyclopaedia articles

* "Poland," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Poland," in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
* "Poland," in The New Student's Reference Work, Chicago: F.E. Compton and Co. (1914)
* "Poland," in Encyclopædia Britannica (12th ed., 1922)
* "Poland", in The World Factbook (1982)
* "Poland", in The World Factbook (1990)
* "Poland", in CIA World Fact Book (2004)
# Popular Science Monthly/Volume 60

Scans
Layout 4
# Priebe Sons v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
332 U.S. 407
Priebe Sons v. United States
Argued: Oct. 13, 1947. --- Decided: Nov 17, 1947
Messrs. J. Arthur Miller, of Chicago, Ill., and Allen H. Gardner, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Philip Elman, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Priest v. Board of Trustees of the Town of Las Vegas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
232 U.S. 604
Priest v. Board of Trustees of the Town of Las Vegas
Argued: January 28, 1914. --- Decided: March 9, 1914
Mr. John D. W. Veeder for appellants.
Messrs. Charles A. Spiess and S. B. Davis, Jr., for appellee.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Presidential Radio Address - 22 March 2008

Weekly radio address delivered on March 22, 2008
Good morning. This weekend, families across America are coming together to celebrate Easter. This is the most important holiday in the Christian faith. And during this special and holy time each year, millions of Americans pause to remember a sacrifice that transcended the grave and redeemed the world.
Easter is a holiday that beckons us homeward. This weekend is an occasion to reflect on the things that matter most in life: the love of family, the laughter of friends, and the peace that comes from being in the place you call home. Through good times and bad, these quiet mercies are sources of hope.
On Easter, we hold in our hearts those who will be spending this holiday far from home -- our troops on the front lines. I deeply appreciate the sacrifices that they and their families are making. America is blessed with the world's greatest military, made up of men and women who fulfill their responsibilities with dignity, humility, and honor. Their dedication is an inspiration to our country and a cause for gratitude this Easter season. On Easter, we remember especially those who have given their lives for the cause of freedom. These brave individuals have lived out the words of the Gospel: "Greater love has no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." And our Nation's fallen heroes live on in the memory of the Nation they helped defend.
On Easter, we also honor Americans who give of themselves here at home. Each year, millions of Americans take time to feed the hungry and clothe the needy and care for the widow and the orphan. Many of them are moved to action by their faith in a loving God who gave His son so that sin would be forgiven. And in this season of renewal, millions across the world remember the gift that took away death's sting and opened the door to eternal life. Laura and I wish you all a happy Easter.
Thank you for listening.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Presidential Radio Address - 22 March 2003

Weekly radio address delivered on March 22, 2003.
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. American and coalition forces have begun a concerted campaign against the regime of Saddam Hussein. In this war, our coalition is broad, more than 40 countries from across the globe. Our cause is just, the security of the nations we serve and the peace of the world. And our mission is clear, to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people.
The future of peace and the hopes of the Iraqi people now depend on our fighting forces in the Middle East. They are conducting themselves in the highest traditions of the American military. They are doing their job with skill and bravery, and with the finest of allies beside them. At every stage of this conflict the world will see both the power of our military, and the honorable and decent spirit of the men and women who serve.
In this conflict, American and coalition forces face enemies who have no regard for the conventions of war or rules of morality. Iraqi officials have placed troops and equipment in civilian areas, attempting to use innocent men, women and children as shields for the dictator's army. I want Americans and all the world to know that coalition forces will make every effort to spare innocent civilians from harm.
A campaign on harsh terrain in a vast country could be longer and more difficult than some have predicted. And helping Iraqis achieve a united, stable, and free country will require our sustained commitment. Yet, whatever is required of us, we will carry out all the duties we have accepted.
Across America this weekend, the families of our military are praying that our men and women will return safely and soon. Millions of Americans are praying with them for the safety of their loved ones and for the protection of all the innocent. Our entire nation appreciates the sacrifices made by military families, and many citizens who live near military families are showing their support in practical ways, such as by helping with child care, or home repairs. All families with loved ones serving in this war can know this: Our forces will be coming home as soon as their work is done.
Our nation entered this conflict reluctantly, yet with a clear and firm purpose. The people of the United States and our friends and allies will not live at the mercy of an outlaw regime that threatens the peace with weapons of mass murder. Now that conflict has come, the only way to limit its duration is to apply decisive force. This will not be a campaign of half-measures. It is a fight for the security of our nation and the peace of the world, and we will accept no outcome but victory.
Thank you for listening.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Political Tracts (Johnson)

POLITICAL
TRACTS.
CONTAINING,
THE FALSE ALARM. FALKLAND’s ISLANDS. THE PATRIOT; and, TAXATION NO TYRANNY.
Fallitur, egregio quisquis sub principe credit Servitium, nunquam Libertas gratior extat Quam sub Rege pio.Claudianus.
LONDON:
Printed for W. Strahan; and T. Cadell in the Strand. M DCC LXXVI.
* The False Alarm
* Falkland’s Islands
* The Patriot
* Taxation no Tyranny
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Table of Contents

1. Of the character of modern wars, and the possibility of permanent peace.
2. Of some of the causes of modern European wars.
3. Of some political remedies for war.
4. Of legal remedies for war.
# Posterior Analytics (Bouchier)/Book II/Chapter VI
### Chapter VI: The Essence cannot be proved by the Definition of the thing itself or by that of its opposite

    Division supplies no common attribute by means of which the various attributes may be bound together, so as to produce one predication instead of several.
Is it possible to demonstrate the real essence of a subject when one has assumed hypothetically that the essential nature of that subject is one of the properties which constitute its formal cause, and that only those particular qualities, all being peculiar to the subject, are so included? (That is the meaning of the essence of a subject).
Has one not however really used the same term, the notion of formal cause, twice over? for one must effect the proof by means of the middle term which ought itself to be proved. Further, just as in a syllogism there is no assumption as to the nature of inference, for the premises on which the syllogism is based always bear the relation of whole or of part to each other, so the essential form of syllogism ought not to be included in the syllogism, but to remain outside the particular premises.
One should meet an objector who questions whether an inference is syllogistic or not, by saying, ‘that at least is the process which we meant by syllogism,’ and to one who asserts that we have not the essential form of syllogism, we should answer with a denial, saying that this was what we meant by the essential form of syllogism. Thus some conclusion may be arrived at without any definition of its essence or of its essential form being given.
Neither can a definition be proved by means of a hypothesis, as illustrated by the following example. Assuming that Evil consists in the quality of ‘the manifold,’ and, in the case of subjects which have an opposite, the opposite of evil, is the opposite of manifold; it might be inferred that good, as being the opposite of evil will possess the quality which is the opposite of manifold, and the essence of good will be proved to be the same as the essence of indivisible. Here too, however, the proof is effected by assuming the essential form of the subject and then proving it, and this assumption is made for the express purpose of effecting the proof. It may be objected that the same term is not really used both in the definition of evil and in the proof, and that there is difference. This may be admitted; for in demonstrations also it is assumed that one thing is predicable of another; but it is not, as in this case, the thing itself which has to be proved, nor yet that which has the same definition or is convertible with it.
The following difficulty applies both to a proof proceeding by division and to a syllogism based on definition. Why are the predicates of a definition not taken separately, as, in the sentence above ‘man is a biped animal,’ why should one not say ‘an animal’ and ‘biped’? The assumptions underlying the definition in no way demand that the attributes predicated should form a single expression; they might be stated separately, as one might call man both ‘musical’ and ‘capable of writing,’ not a ‘musical writer.’
# Posterior Analytics (Bouchier)/Book II/Chapter IX
### Chapter IX: What Essences can and what cannot be proved

    When the Cause of the thing and the thing itself are identical, no demonstration is possible; for we have then reached ultimate principles, the nature of which must be assumed. When the Cause is outside the thing the Cause may be used as a middle term in the demonstration.
Some things have, others have not a cause outside themselves. It is clear therefore that of a thing’s essential qualities some are ultimate and primary, the existence and nature of which must either be assumed by hypothesis or made clear in some other way than by demonstration. The arithmetician proceeds in this way, assuming both the nature of unity and also that it exists. In the case of things which have a middle term, things the cause of whose substance is something outside themselves, there may be a demonstration, as we have said, this cause being taken as a middle term, although the underlying essence of the thing is not demonstrated.
# Posterior Analytics (Bouchier)/Book II/Chapter XIV
### Chapter XIV: On the discovery of Questions for Demonstration

    To express questions for demonstration in a fitting manner a subject must be selected to which the quality to be demonstrated primarily belongs.
In order to find questions for solution we must make a selection from various partitions and divisions, taking care that a common generic notion lies at the base of all subordinate divisions, and assuming that all belong to a common genus. E.g. If Animals be the subject of investigation, we must first lay down what attributes are common to every animal. When this is done we should find what are the attributes of the first subdivision after the genus. Thus, if the subject be a bird, we should find the qualities possessed by every bird, and we must continue thus with the attributes of each lower term in the series. We shall then clearly be able to give the reason why the species included in the common genus possess such and such attributes; e.g. the reason why Man or Horse, as species of Animal, possess particular attributes. Let A be animal, B the attributes of every animal, C, D, E, particular species of animal. Now it is clear why B is an attribute of D, namely because of A, and it will similarly belong to the other species of animal. The same reasoning applies to other instances.
Hitherto we have spoken of cases where custom has sanctioned the application of the common class names to the particular species, but we should not limit ourselves to these. If anything else be seen to be an attribute of several things but to have no common generic name, we should take it for examination and look what are its attributes or of what it is an attribute. Thus, the possession of a ruminating stomach is a commonattribute of horned animals, as well as the possession of front teeth in one jaw only. We must then enquire what animals have the attribute of being horned. It will then be clear why the attribute mentioned belongs to these animals. It will belong to them because they have horns. Another method consists in the observation of analogies. No single designation for instance exists for the spine of a fish, the pounce of a cuttle and ordinary bone, and yet all these parts have common qualities, as if their nature were the same in each case.

### Notes

* ↑ Cf. Arist. de Part. Anim., III, 2.