OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/Appendices/Appendix 1/Chapter 2

ACT OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND.
An act to confirm an act to the General Assembly of the state of Virginia, entitled “An act incorporating the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company.”
Act of Maryland.Whereas, the General Assembly of Virginia have, heretofore, at the December session of the said General Assembly, in the year eighteen hundred and twenty-three, passed an act, entitled “An act incorporating the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company,” in the substance, or words following:
[See the preceding act.]
Therefore, be it enacted by the General Assembly of Maryland, That the said act of the General Assembly of Virginia be, and the same is hereby, accepted, assented to, and confirmed.
Act of Virginia accepted with a condition.And be it further enacted and declared, That, by confirming and accepting the act of Virginia, it is not intended by the legislature of Maryland, to deny to the Congress of the United States the constitutional power to legislate on the subjects of roads and canals. And for the purpose of removing all doubt as to the right of the state of Maryland to intersect the said Chesapeake and Ohio canal, for the purpose of conducting a lateral canal or canals to Baltimore or elsewhere in the state of Maryland, from that part of the said Chesapeake and Ohio canal, which shall be within the District of Columbia—
We hereby certify, that the foregoing is a true copy of the original act, as passed both branches of the legislature at December session, eighteen hundred and twenty-four.
Wm. Kilty, Clerk Sen. of Md.
John Brewer, Clerk House Del.
Annapolis, Jan 31, 1825.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/Appendices/Appendix 1/Chapter 7

ACT OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND.
An Act to amend the “Act incorporating the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company.”
Act of Maryland.Section 1. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Maryland, That the act, entitled “An act incorporating the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company, passed by the General Assembly of Virginia, at the December session, eighteen hundred and twenty-three,” which has already received the assent of the state of Maryland, and of the Congress of the United States, as well as of the Potomac Company, shall be, and the same is hereby, amended, in the manner hereinafter provided, on condition that this act receive, in like manner, the assent of the necessary parties thereto.
Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company shall have power to terminate the eastern section of the said canal at or near the town of Cumberland, on the river Potomac, and thence, to extend the western section thereof, in any direction that may be deemed expedient, by any other route, as well as that prescribed in the act aforesaid, towards Pittsburg, on the river Ohio; and, in extending the same in any direction across the dividing ridge which separates the eastern and western waters, to substitute for a tunnel, and numerous locks, on such part of the route, inclined planes and railways, or any other artificial communication or roads; and, in the event that the western section of the Chesapeake and Ohio canal shall leave the valley of the Potomac river at any point below the Coal Banks, at or near the mouth of Savage, on the north branch thereof, the company shall have the power, in like manner, to extend a branch from the main canal to the said Coal Banks, at or above the mouth of Savage, and to cause such branch to be constructed, of such dimensions as their views of their own and the public interest may warrant; and, for the construction of the same, shall have and enjoy the same rights, privileges, and immunities, under the same restraints and conditions, in all respects, as they are entitled to in relation to the main Chesapeake and Ohio canal.
Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That nothing in this act contained shall be held to discharge the said company from a compliance with each and every of the conditions of the original act, except so far as the same are expressly altered by the provisions of this act.
Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That this act shall commence and be in force as soon as it shall have received the assent of the legislature of Virginia, of the Congress of the United States, and of the Potomac Company.
Witness our respective signatures, this sixth day of February, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and twenty-seven.
W. Kilty, Clerk Senate,
Gideon Pierce, Clerk House of Delegates, Md.
# United States v. Dickinson (213 U.S. 92)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
213 U.S. 92
United States v. Dickinson
Argued: January 4, 5, 1909. --- Decided: April 5, 1909
Mr. Asa P. French, Attorney General Bonaparte, and Solicitor General Hoyt for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 92-94 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Henry W. Dunn, Samuel L. Powers, and Powers & Hall for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 94-95 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice Fuller delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Diebold Incorporated

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
369 U.S. 654
United States v. Diebold Incorporated
Argued: April 23, 1962. --- Decided: May 14, 1962
Daniel M. Friedman, Washington, D.C., for the appellant.
William L. McGovern, Washington, D.C., for the appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Dickinson

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Dickinson."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Dickinson (213 U.S. 92)
* United States v. Dickinson (331 U.S. 745)
See also Dickinson v. United States.
# United States v. Dickinson (331 U.S. 745)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
331 U.S. 745
United States v. Dickinson (331 U.S. 745)
Argued: Dec. 13, 1946. --- Decided: June 16, 1947
Mr. Ralph S. Boyd, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Ernest K. James, of Charleston, W. Va., for respondents.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Diebold Incorporated/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
369 U.S. 654
United States v. Diebold Incorporated
Argued: April 23, 1962. --- Decided: May 14, 1962
This is a civil antitrust suit by the Government challenging Diebold's acquisition of the assets of the Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Company as being violative of § 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 18. On motion of Diebold the District Court entered summary judgment against the Government on the ground that the acquired firm was a 'failing company' under the doctrine of International Shoe Co. v. Federal Trade Comm'n, 280 U.S. 291, 50 S.Ct. 89, 74 L.Ed. 431 (1930). The case is here on direct appeal. 368 U.S. 894, 82 S.Ct. 171, 7 L.Ed.2d 91.
In determining that the acquisition of the assets of Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Company was not a violation of § 7, the District Court acted upon its findings that 'HHM was hopelessly insolvent and faced with imminent receivership' and that 'Diebold was the only bona fide prospective purchaser for HHM's business.' The latter finding represents at least in part the resolution of a head-on factual controversy as revealed by the materials before the District Court of whether other offers for HHM's assets or business were actually made. In any event both findings represent a choice of inferences to be drawn from the subsidiary facts contained in the affidavits, attached exhibits, and depositions submitted below. On summary judgment the inferences to be drawn from the underlying facts contained in such materials must be viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion. A study of the record in this light leads us to believe that inferences contrary to those drawn by the trial court might be permissible. The materials before the District Court having thus raised a genuine issue as to ultimate facts material to the rule of International Shoe Co. v. Federal Trade Comm'n, it was improper for the District Court to decide the applicability of the rule on a motion for summary judgment. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., 56(c), 28 U.S.C.A.
Reversed and remanded.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Dieckerhoff

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
202 U.S. 302
United States v. Dieckerhoff
Argued: April 17, 1906. --- Decided: May 14, 1906
Assistant Attorney General McReynolds for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from page 303 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. W. Wickham Smith and John K. Maxwell for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from page 304 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/14th Congress/1st Session/Resolution 1

I. Resolution directing a copy of the documents printed by a resolve of Congress, of the 27th of December, 1813, to be transmitted to each of the judges of the Supreme Court.
Documents to be transmitted to the judges of the Supreme Court.Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, that of the two hundred copies of the documents ordered to be printed by a resolve of the Senate and House of Representatives of the twenty-seventh of December, one thousand eight hundred and thirteen, the Secretary of State be, and he is hereby authorized to take one copy for each of the judges of the Supreme Court of the United States, to be transmitted to said judges according to the provision of the act of Congress of the eighteenth of April, one thousand eight hundred and fourteen.
Approved, February 6, 1816.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/14th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 81

Chap. LXXXI.—An Act establishing a port of delivery at the town of the Bayou St. John.
Bayou St. John a port of entry.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the town of the Bayou St. John, in the state of Louisiana, shall be a port of delivery; that a surveyor shall be appointed to reside at said port; that all ships and vessels bound to the said port shall, after proceeding thereto, and making report and entry at the port of New Orleans, within the time limited by law, be permitted to unlade their cargoes at the said town of the Bayou St. John, or at the basin of the canal of Carondelet, adjoining the city of New Orleans, under the rules and regulations prescribed by law.
Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That so much of the sixth section of the act of Congress, passed on the twenty-fourth day of February, one thousand eight hundred and four, entitledAct of Feb. 24, 1804, ch. 13. “An act for laying and collecting duties on imports and tonnage, within the territories ceded to the United States by the treaty of the thirtieth of April, one thousand eight hundred and three, between the United States and the French republic, and for other purposes,” as is contrary to this act, is hereby repealed.
Approved, April 26, 1816.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/14th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 98

Chap. XCVIII.—An Act authorizing the payment for the courthouse of Hamilton, in the state of Ohio.
Act of April 9, 1816, ch. 40. Payments to be made for the destruction of the courthouse.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the commissioner to be appointed by virtue of the act, entitled “An act to authorize the payment for property lost, captured or destroyed by the enemy while in the military service of the United States, and for other purposes,” ​passed the ninth of April, one thousand eight hundred and sixteen, be, and he is hereby authorized and directed to audit and settle the claim of the county of Hamilton, in the state of Ohio, for the destruction by fire of the county courthouse while occupied by the troops of the United States, by ascertaining the value thereof, in the manner and form prescribed by the aforesaid act.
Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the amount thereof, when so ascertained, shall be paid to the proper authority out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, April 26, 1816.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/14th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 9

Chap. IX.—An act continuing in force certain acts, laying duties on bank notes, refined sugars, and for other purposes.
Duties on stamps of bank notes, and on refined sugar, continued. Act of 1813, ch. 53. Act of 1814, ch. 11. Act of 1813, ch. 21.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the act entitled, “An act laying duties on notes of banks, bankers, and certain companies; on notes, bonds, and obligations, discontinued by banks, bankers, and certain companies; and on bills of exchange of certain descriptions,” passed the second day of August, one thousand eight hundred and thirteen, and the act supplementary to said act, passed the tenth day of December, one thousand eight hundred and fourteen, and the act, entitled “An act laying duties on sugar refined within the United States,” passed the twenty-fourth day of July, one thousand eight hundred and thirteen, shall be, and the same are hereby continued in force; any thing in the said acts in any wise to the contrary notwithstanding.
Approved, February 1, 1816.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/14th Congress/1st Session/Resolution 3

III. Resolution requesting the President to present medals to Captain Stewart and the officers of the frigate Constitution.
Medals to Captain Stewart and the officers of the Constitution.Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be, and he is hereby requested to present to Captain Charles Stewart, of the frigate Constitution, a gold medal, with suitable emblems and devices, and a silver medal, with suitable emblems and devices, to each commissioned officer of the said frigate, in testimony of the high sense entertained by Congress of the gallantry, good conduct and services of Captain Stewart, his officers and crew, in the capture of the British vessels of war, the Cyane and the Levant, after a brave and skilful combat.
Approved, February 22, 1816.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/14th Congress/1st Session/Resolution 5

V. Resolution for printing the laws relating to naturalization.
Four thousand copies of the laws relating to naturalization of the United States to be printed and distributed.Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of State be authorized and directed to cause to be printed four thousand copies of the laws now in force on the subject of naturalization. And, of the copies which may be so provided, two shall be sent to each marshal of a judicial district of the United States, two to the clerk or prothonotary for each court of the United States, or of a particular state, which may, by law, admit persons to be naturalized, and two to each collector of the customs. The remaining copies, after reserving such as the President of ​the United States may deem proper for the use of the executive departments, shall be placed in the library of Congress.
Approved, April 16, 1816.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/14th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 95

Chap. XCV.—An Act to increase the compensation now allowed by law to inspectors, measures, weighers and gaugers, employed in the collection of the customs.
Increase of inspectors’ compensation. Act of March 2, 1799, ch. 23.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That an addition of fifty per cent. upon the sums allowed as compensation to inspectors, or persons acting as occasional inspectors, employed in aid of the customs, and to the measurers, weighers or gaugers, by the act, entitled “An act to establish the compensations of the officers employed in the collection of the duties on imposts and tonnage, and for other purposes,” passed on the second of March, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-nine, be, and the same is hereby allowed, to the said inspectors, measurers, weighers, or gaugers, to be ascertained, certified and paid, under the regulations prescribed in the above-mentioned act.
Approved, April 26, 1816.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/14th Congress/1st Session/Resolution 4

IV. Resolution requesting the President to present medals to Captain James Biddle, and the officers of the sloop of war Hornet.
Medals to Captain Biddle, and the officers of the Hornet.Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be, and he is hereby requested, to present to Captain James Biddle, of the sloop of war Hornet, a gold medal, with suitable emblems and devices, and a silver medal, with suitable emblems and devices, to each commissioned officer of the said sloop of war, in testimony of the high sense entertained by Congress of the gallantry, good conduct and services of Captain Biddle, his officers and crew, in capturing the British sloop of war, Penguin, after a brave and skilful combat.
Approved, February 22, 1816.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/14th Congress/1st Session/Resolution 6

VI. Resolution requiring the Secretary of State to compile and print, once in every two years, a register of all officers and agents, civil, military and naval in the services of the United States.
Register of the officers and agents, civil, military and naval, to be compiled every two years by the Secretary of State.Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That once in two years, a register, containing correct lists of all the officers and agents, civil, military and naval, in the service of the United States, made up to the last day of September of each year in which a new Congress is to assemble, be compiled and printed under the direction of the Secretary for the department of state. And to enable him to form such register, he, for his own department, and the heads of the other departments, respectively, shall, in due time, cause such lists as aforesaid, of all officers and agents, in their respective departments, including clerks, cadets and midshipmen, to be made and lodged in the office of the department of state. And the said lists shall exhibit the amount of compensation, pay, and emoluments allowed to each officer, agent, clerk, cadet and midshipman, the state and county in which he was born and where employed.
List of the ships and vessels of the United States. 2. Resolved, That the Secretary of the Navy subjoin to the list of the persons employed in his department, the names, force and condition of all the ships and vessels belonging to the United States, and when and where built.
3. Resolved, That five hundred copies of the said register be printed; and that on the first Monday in January in each year, when a new Congress shall be assembled, there be delivered to the President, the Vice President, each head of a department,Distribution. each member of the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States, one copy of such register; and to the secretary of the Senate, and clerk of the House of Representatives, each, ten copies, for the use of the respective Houses; that twenty-five copies shall be deposited in the library of the United States at the seat of government, to be used like other books in that library, and that the residue of the said copies be disposed of in such manner as Congress shall from time to time direct.
4. Resolved, That for the information of the present Congress, such register as aforesaid be prepared and distributed as aforesaid, on the first day of its next session.
Approved, April 27, 1816.
# United States v. Fortier

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
342 U.S. 160
United States v. Fortier
Argued: Oct. 10, 1951. --- Decided: Dec 11, 1951
Where Veterans' Emergency Housing Act was specifically repealed by Housing and Rent Act of 1947, saving provision of Veterans Act that liability incurred or offenses committed prior to termination of Act would remain in force, could not be relied on to sustain actions by United States against contractor to make restitution to veterans for sums received from sale of houses after repeal in excess of maximum sales prices established before repeal by Federal Housing Administration. Veterans' Emergency Housing Act of 1946, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1821 et seq.; Housing and Rent Act of 1947, §§ 4(a), 202(c)(1)(B)(3)(A), 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, §§ 1884(a), 1892(c)(1)(B)(3)(A); 1 U.S.C.A. § 109.
Where Veterans' Emergency Housing Act of 1946 contained detailed authorization for price restrictions on houses and for priorities on building materials and when that act was repealed in 1947, Congress provided for veterans' preferences in sale and rental of housing and for rent ceilings on certain accommodations constructed with assistance of priorities secured under the 1946 Act, Congress having addressed itself to problem of veterans' housing but having refrained from imposing any price restrictions on sale of houses, restrictions could not be imposed by implication. Veterans' Emergency Housing Act of 1946, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1821 et seq.; Housing and Rent Act of 1947, § 1(a), 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1881(a).
Mr. Oscar H. Davis, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Stanley M. Brown, Manchester, N.H., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse