OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Poems (Chesterton, 1915)/The Revolutionist, or Lines to a Statesman

THE REVOLUTIONIST: OR LINES TO A STATESMAN
"I WAS NEVER STANDING BY WHILE A REVOLUTION WAS GOING ON."-Speech by the Rt. Hon. Walter Long.
WHEN Death was on thy drums, Democracy, And with one rush of slaves the world was free, In that high dawn that Kings shall not forget, A void there was and Walter was not yet. Through sacked Versailles, at Valmy in the fray, They did without him in some kind of way; Red Christendom all Walterless they cross, And in their fury hardly feel their loss . . . Fades the Republic; faint as Roland's horn, Her trumpets taunt us with a sacred scorn . . . Then silence fell; and Mr. Long was born.
From his first hours in his expensive cot He never saw the tiniest viscount shot. In deference to his wealthy parents' whim The wildest massacres were kept from him. ​The wars that dyed Pall Mall and Brompton red Passed harmless o'er that one unconscious head: For all that little Long could understand The rich might still be rulers of the land. Vain are the pious arts of parenthood, Foiled Revolution bubbled in his blood; Until one day (the babe unborn shall rue it) The Constitution bored him and he slew it.
If I were wise and good and rich and strong— Fond, impious thought, if I were Walter Long— If I could water sell like molten gold, And make grown people do as they are told, If over private fields and wastes as wide As a Greek city for which heroes died, I owned the houses and the men inside— If all this hung on one thin thread of habit I would not revolutionize a rabbit.
I would sit tight with all my gifts and glories, And even preach to unconverted Tories, That the fixed system that our land inherits, Viewed from a certain standpoint, has its merits. I'd guard the laws like any Radical, And keep each precedent, however small, However subtle, misty, dusty, dreamy, Lest man by chance should look at me and see me; Lest men should ask what madman made me lord Of English ploughshares and the English sword; ​Lest men should mark how sleepy is the nod That drills the dreadful images of God!
Walter, be wise! avoid the wild and new, The Constitution is the game for you. Walter, beware! scorn not the gathering throng, It suffers, yet it may not suffer wrong, It suffers, yet it cannot suffer Long. And if you goad it these grey rules to break, For a few pence, see that you do not wake Death and the splendour of the scarlet cap, Boston and Valmy, Yorktown and Jemmappes, Freedom in arms, the riding and the routing, The thunder of the captains and the shouting, All that lost riot that you did not share— And when that riot comes—you will be there.
# Poems (Chesterton, 1915)/The Shakespeare Memorial

THE SHAKESPEARE MEMORIAL
LORD Lilac thought it rather rotten That Shakespeare should be quite forgotten, And therefore got on a Committee With several chaps out of the city, And Shorter and Sir Herbert Tree, Lord Rothschild and Lord Rosebery And F.C.G. and Comyns Carr, Two dukes and a dramatic star, Also a clergyman now dead; And while the vain world careless sped Unheeding the heroic name— The souls most fed with Shakespeare's flame Still sat unconquered in a ring, Remembering him like anything.
Lord Lilac did not long remain, Lord Lilac did not come again. He softly lit a cigarette And sought some other social set Where, in some other knots or rings, People were doing cultured things, —Miss Zwilt's Humane Vivarium —The little men that paint on gum ​—The exquisite Gorilla Girl. . . . He sometimes, in this giddy whirl (Not being really bad at heart), Remembered Shakespeare with a start— But not with that grand constancy Of Clement Shorter, Herbert Tree, Lord Rosebery and Comyns Carr And all the other names there are; Who stuck like limpets to the spot, Lest they forgot, lest they forgot.
Lord Lilac was of slighter stuff; Lord Lilac had had quite enough.
# Oh! Come Ye Faithful, And Your Homage Bring

From The Hymns of the Primitive Church, 1821; retrieved from hymnsandcarolsofchristmas.com
Oh! come ye faithful, and your homage bring  To David's town with glad accord; Behold the Son, behold the angels' King:  Oh, come ye, and sing praises to the Lord!
For he, the God of God, the Light of Light,  The Virgin's womb hath not abhorred: And God is now reveal'd to mortal sight!  Oh, come ye, and sing praises to the Lord!
And hark ! the angels through the lofty sky  Their praises to his name afford; All glory they ascribe to God on high!  Oh, come ye, and sing praises to the Lord!
Oh, Jesu Virgin-born! thy name shall be,  On this thy day for aye ador'd! Incarnate Word of God, we worship Thee!  Oh, come ye, and sing praises to the Lord!
# Pericles, Prince of Tyre (Lamb)

A retelling of Shakespeare's play Pericles.
* "Pericles, Prince of Tyre," in Tales from Shakspeare (1831), by Charles and Mary Lamb
* "Pericles, Prince of Tyre," in Tales from Shakespeare (1908), by Charles and Mary Lamb, illustrated by Arthur Rackham
# Pericles (Shakespeare)

* related portals: Elizabethan drama.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, quotes, Wikidata item.
Pericles, Prince of Tyre is a play written, at least in part, by William Shakespeare and included in modern editions of his collected works despite questions over its authorship, as it was not included in the First Folio.
* Pericles, Prince of Tyre, first quarto (1609)
* Pericles, edited by K. Deighton, The Works of Shakespeare, The Arden Shakespeare, 1st ser. (1907) IA
* Pericles, Prince of Tyre, in The Complete Works of William Shakespeare, Vol. IX, Oxford edition (1911) IA
* Pericles, Prince of Tyre, edited by Alfred R. Bellinger, The Yale Shakespeare (1925)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago. Translations or editions published later may be copyrighted.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pericles (1925) Yale

* related portals: The Yale Shakespeare.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, quotes, Wikidata item.
Part of The Yale Shakespeare series.
Layout 2
∵ The Yale Shakespeare ∵
PERICLES, PRINCE OF TYRE
EDITED BY ALFRED R. BELLINGER
NEW HAVEN • YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON • HUMPHREY MILFORD OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS • MCMXXV
Copyright, 1925 By Yale University Press
Printed in the United States of America
TABLE OF CONTENTS :
| | PAGE |
| The Text | 1 |
| Act I | 1 |
| Act II | 19 |
| Act III | 39 |
| Act IV | 52 |
| Act V | 76 |
| Notes | 93 |
| Appendix A. Sources of the Play | 112 |
| Appendix B. The History of the Play | 116 |
| Appendix C. Authorship of the Play | 121 |
| Appendix D. The Text of the Present Edition | 129 |
| Appendix E. Suggestions for Collateral Reading | 132 |
| Index of Words Glossed | 135 |
The facsimile opposite reproduces the title-page of the Elizabethan Club copy of the first edition of 'Pericles.'
THE YALE SHAKESPEARE
Edited by
Wilbur L. CrossTucker Brooke
Published under the Direction
of the
Department of English, Yale University,
on the Fund
Given to the Yale University Press in 1917
by the Members of the
Kingsley Trust Association
To Commemorate the Seventy-Fifth Anniversary
of the Founding of the Society
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1978, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 45 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pericles (Emerson)

Poem written in 1826
* Pericles in May-day and other pieces (1867)
* Pericles in Poems (Household Edition, 1904)
# Peril as a Possession

Peril as a Possesssion 'Tis Good to hear Danger disintegrates Satiety There's Basis there — Begets an awe That searches Human Nature's creases As clean as Fire.
# Perils of Certain English Prisoners (1900)

Published in 1900 in The Holly-Tree Inn and Other Reprinted Pieces, the second volume of A Child's History of England and Miscellaneous Pieces. Originally published in 1857.
PERILS OF CERTAIN ENGLISH PRISONERS.
[1857.]
IN TWO CHAPTERS.
* Chapter 1
* Chapter 2
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ottawa Journal/May 16, 1922

* Financial Obligations Settled, St. Patrick's Parish Celebrates
* Literary Notes
# Ottawa v. National Bank

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
105 U.S. 342
Ottawa v. National Bank
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
The facts are state in the opinion of the court.
Mr. C. B. Lawrence for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. G. S. Eldredge for the defendant in error.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ott v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
336 U.S. 169
Ott v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company
Argued: Jan. 5, 1949. --- Decided: Feb 7, 1949
See 336 U.S. 928, 69 S.Ct. 653.
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth circuit.
Mr. Howard W. Lenfant, of New Orleans, La., for appellants.
Mr. Arthur A. Moreno, of New Orleans, La., for appellees.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ottawa Journal

The Ottawa Journal was a daily broadsheet newspaper published in Ottawa, Ontario from 1885 to 1980.
* May 16, 1922
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ottawa Illustrated

Ottawa Illustrated
OTTAWA
Illustrated. Illustrated.
Photo-Gravures
Chas. H. Thorburn, Bookseller and Stationer, 80 Sparks Street, Ottawa, Canada.
THE ALBERTYPE CO. N. Y.
The House of Commons.
Lobby—House of Commons.
Hall of House of Commons.
Government Buildings, from Nepean Point.
The Senate Room.
Library of Parliament.
Library of Parliament—Interior.
Departmental Building—Eastern Block.
Lovers' Walk.
Departmental Building—Western Block.
The Langevin Government Building—Wellington Street.
Chaudiere Falls.
The Post Office, Sappers' and Dufferin Bridges.
Rideau Hall.
Ottawa River—Lumber District.
Government Printing Bureau and Cathedral, from Parliament Hill.
Chaudiere Suspension Bridge. The Slides. Rideau Canal Locks.
Central Chambers. The Free Press. Elgin Street, from City Hall.
City Hall. Collegiate Institute. Protestant Orphan Home.
View from Normal School.
Normal School.
Dominion Methodist Church.
Jacques Cartier Monument. Protestant Orphan Home. Sharpshooters' Monument.
Christ Church.
The Drill Hall—Collegiate Institute.
Sparks Street.
Rideau Falls.
Rideau Falls in Winter.
Lumber District.
Life on a Raft.
Ottawa River, from Rock Cliff.
Curling at Rideau Hall.Tobogganing at Rideau Hall. Trappers.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
This work is in the public domain in Canada because it originates from Canada and one of the following statements is true:
* The author died over 70 years ago (before 1954) and the work was published more than 50 years ago (before 1974).
* The author died before 1972, meaning that copyright on that author's works expired before the Canadian copyright term was extended non-retroactively from 50 to 70 years on 30 December 2022.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
This template must be accompanied by a tag indicating copyright status in the United States.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ottinger v. Bronx Gas and Electric Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
273 U.S. 772
Ottinger v. Bronx Gas and Electric Company

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pennell v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
231 U.S. 675
Pennell v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company
Argued: December 3, 1913. --- Decided: January 5, 1914
Mr. George Demming for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. William Clarke Mason and Charles Heebner for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Penn v. Calhoun

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
121 U.S. 251
Penn v. Calhoun
Chas. W. Thomas, for appellant.
No appearance for appellee.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pennekamp v. Florida

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
328 U.S. 331
Pennekamp v. Florida
Argued: Feb. 7, 1946. --- Decided: June 3, 1946
[Syllabus from pages 331-333 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Elisha Hanson, of Washington, D.C., and Robert R. Milam, of Jacksonville, Fla., for petitioners.
Messrs. Elisha Hanson, of Washington, D.C., and Robert R. Milam, of Jacksonville, Fla., for petitioners.
Messrs. J. Tom Watson, of Tallahassee, Fla., Giles J. Patterson, of Jacksonville, Fla., and James M. Carson, of Miami, for respondent.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 11/The dace

​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/167 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/168
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 11/The Odenwald and Lindenfels

​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/212 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/213 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/214 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/215
# Pinto v. Pierce/Concurrence Fortas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Black Fortas
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 31
Pinto v. Pierce
Mr. Justice FORTAS concurring in the result.
I concur in the result because of trial counsel's consent to the taking of evidence on voluntariness in the presence of the jury. Otherwise, I disagree. The rule of Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964), should be more than ritual. It was not intended to assure a determination by the judge at the cost of diluting the jury's rule in the determination of voluntariness and the weight to be given to admissions. 'Just as questions of admissibility of evidence are traditionally for the court, questions of credibility, whether of a witness or a confession, are for the jury.' Id., at 386, n. 13, 84 S.Ct. at 1786. See also id., at 378, n. 8, 84 S.Ct. at 1781, and cf. id., at 404, 84 S.Ct. at 1795 (separate opinion of Black, J.).
Jackson v. Denno means that the judge and the jury must each make an independent judgment of voluntariness of an admission, the judge for purposes of admissibility and the jury for evidentiary acceptability, credibility, and weight. A telescoped hearing before judge and jury, in which the judge finds voluntariness for purposes of admissibility, in reality reduces the jury function to an echo. Hearing the evidence simultaneously with the judge, the jury is not apt to approach disagreement with him. I believe that the procedure here sanctioned, by reducing the effectiveness of the jury, gravely impairs the constitutional principle of excluding involuntary confessions which Jackson v. Denno sought to serve.
The jury is the traditional and preferred arbiter of facts. The procedure countenanced here, by dicta, sanctions, in effect, a direction to the jury to accept and give full credence to the admission-because the judge, hearing the same testimony, has ruled that the admission is voluntary.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pinkerton v. Ledoux

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
129 U.S. 346
Pinkerton v. Ledoux
F. W. Clancy, for plaintiff in error.
H. E. Davis and James E. Padgett, for defendant in error.
BRADLEY, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pink—small—and punctual—

* "May-Flower" in Poems (1890)
* "Pink, small, and punctual" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# Pinto v. Pierce/Concurrence Black

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Black Fortas
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 31
Pinto v. Pierce
Mr. Justice BLACK concurs in the result.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pinkerton v. United States

Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640 (1946), is a case in the Supreme Court of the United States. The case enunciated the principle of Pinkerton liability, a prominent concept in the law of conspiracy. Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Concurrence/Dissent

    Rutledge
United States Supreme Court
328 U.S. 640
PINKERTON et al. v. UNITED STATES.
Argued: May 1, 1946. --- Decided: June 10, 1946
See 67 S.Ct. 26.
Mr. John S. Tucker, Jr., of Birmingham, Ala., for petitioners.
Mr. W. Marvin Smith, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pinto v. Pierce

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinions

    Black
    Fortas
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 31
Pinto v. Pierce
See 389 U.S. 997, 88 S.Ct. 462.
Thomas P. Ford, Jr., for petitioner.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Panama Company v. Vasquez

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
271 U.S. 557
Panama Company v. Vasquez
Argued: January 13, 1926. --- Decided: June 7, 1926
Mr. Richard Reid Rogers, of New York City, for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from page 558 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Martin A. Schenck, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan

Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U.S. 388 (1935), also known as the Hot Oil case, was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the Roosevelt Administration's prohibition of interstate and foreign trade in petroleum goods produced in excess of state quotas—the "hot oil" orders adopted under the 1933 National Industrial Recovery Act. Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Cardozo
United States Supreme Court
293 U.S. 388
Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan Amazon Petroleum Corp. v. Ryan
No. Nos 135, 260 Argued: Dec. 10, 11, 1934. --- Decided: Jan 7, 1935
[Syllabus from pages 388-390 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. J. N. Saye, of Longview, Tex., and F. W. Fischer, of Tyler, Tex., for petitioners.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 391-398 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Harold M. Stephens, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 398-405 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Panama Company v. Toppin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
252 U.S. 308
Panama Company v. Toppin
Argued: and Submitted Jan. 16, 1920. --- Decided: March 15, 1920
Messrs. Frank Feuille and Walter F. Van Dame, both of Ancon, C. Z., for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Wm. C. MacIntyre, of Cristobal, C. Z., and Felix E. Porter, of Ancon, C. Z., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Panama Mail Company v. Vargas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
281 U.S. 670
Panama Mail Company v. Vargas
Argued: April 23, 24, 1930. --- Decided: June 2, 1930
Mr. Thomas A. Thacher, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
Mr. H. W. Hutton, of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pensive at Eve

A parody of Charles Lamb.
Pensive at eve on the hard world I mus'd, And my poor heart was sad: so at the moon I gaz'd—and sigh'd, and sigh'd!—for, ah! how soon Eve darkens into night. Mine eye perus'd With tearful vacancy the dampy grass Which wept and glitter'd in the paly ray; And I did pause me on my lonely way, And mused me on those wretched ones, who pass O'er the black heath of Sorrow. But, alas! Most of Myself I thought: when it befell, That the sooth Spirit of the breezy wood Breath'd in mine ear—"All this is very well; But much of one thing is for no thing good." Ah! my poor heart's inexplicable swell!
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse