OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/5th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 13

Chap. ⅩⅢ.—An Act for the augmentation of the Navy.
Section 1.Six ships of not less than 74 guns, and six sloops of war of 18 guns to be procured &c. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That under the orders of the President of the United States, and in addition to the naval armament already authorized by law, there shall be built within the United States, six ships of war, of a size to carry, and which shall be armed with not less than seventy-four guns each; and there shall be built or purchased within the United States, six sloops of war, of a size to carry, and which shall be armed with eighteen guns each, or not exceeding that force; all which ships and vessels shall be procured, manned and employed as soon as may be, for the service of the United States:One million of dollars appropriated. And in part of the necessary expenditures to be incurred herein, a sum not exceeding one million of dollars, shall be, and is hereby appropriated, and shall be paid out of any monies which shall be in the treasury of the United States, not otherwise appropriated.
Sec. 2.The President may augment the force of the other vessels. And be it further enacted, That the President of the United States, shall be, and he is hereby authorized to augment, at his discretion, the force of any ship or vessel, now in the service, or building for the service of the United States, by allowing an additional number of guns and men therein, beyond the established rate, and according to the respective size and capacity of such ship or vessel:$35,000 appropriated. And a sum not exceeding thirty-five thousand dollars, shall be, and is hereby appropriated to defray the expense of such augmentation, and shall be paid out of any monies which shall be in the treasury of the United States, not otherwise appropriated.
Sec. 3.Revenue cutters whose force has been increased may be placed on the naval establishment. Ante, p. 533. And be it further enacted, That the President of the United States shall be, and is hereby authorized to place on the naval establishment, and employ accordingly, all or any of the vessels, which, as revenue cutters, have been increased in force, and employed in the defence of the sea-coast, pursuant to the act, intituled “An act providing a naval armament;” and thereupon, the officers and crews of such vessels, may be allowed, at the discretion of the President of the United States, the pay, subsistence, advantages and compensations, proportionably to the ​rates of such vessels, and shall be governed by the rules and discipline, which are, or which shall be established for the navy of the United States.
Approved, February 25, 1799.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/5th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 18

Chap. ⅩⅧ.—An Act concerning French Citizens that have been, or may be captured and brought into the United States.
President authorized to send to the dominions of France captured French citizens. Ante, p. 574.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be, and he hereby is authorized to exchange or send away from the United States to the dominions of France, as he may deem proper and expedient, all French citizens that have been or may be captured and brought into the United States, in pursuance of the act, intituled “An act in addition to the act more effectually to protect the commerce and coasts of the United States.”
Approved, February 28, 1799.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/5th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 20

Chap. ⅩⅩ.—An Act to amend the act intituled “An act to provide for the valuation of lands and dwelling-houses, and the enumeration of slaves within the United States.”
Sec. 2. Amendments of the former act respecting the time of returning lists and respecting appeals.And be it further enacted, That the commissioners under the said act, for each state, respectively, shall be, and hereby are authorized to extend the time thereby allowed for receiving appeals by the principal assessors, and also the time so allowed for returning lists by the assistant assessors in all cases where the said commissioners shall deem such extension necessary, and for such time as they shall think expedient, and that so much of the twentieth section of the above mentioned act as requires all appeals to be made in writing, be, and it is hereby repealed.
Sec. 3. Compensations to assessors may be augmented.And be it further enacted, That the Secretary of the Treasury shall be, and hereby is authorized and empowered, under the direction of the President of the United States, to augment, in cases where he may find it necessary, the compensations fixed for principal and assistant assessors, by said act, so, however, as that no principal or assistant assessor shall, in any case, receive more than two dollars per day, which additional compensations shall be subject to the same rules of settlement as are established by the aforesaid act respecting the compensations therein fixed for principal and assistant assessors.
Approved, February 28, 1799.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/5th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 15

Chap. ⅩⅤ.—An Act authorizing the establishment of Docks.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That two docks, for the convenience of repairing the public ships and vessels, be erected in suitable places, under the direction of the President of the United States, and that the sum of fifty thousand dollars be appropriated towards effecting this object, to be paid out of any monies in the treasury of the United States, not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, February 25, 1799.
# United States v. Ogilvie Hardware Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
330 U.S. 709
United States v. Ogilvie Hardware Company
Argued: March 5, 1947. --- Decided: April 7, 1947
Mr. Lee A. Jackson, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Elias Goldstein, of Shreveport, La., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from page 710 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Ohio Oil Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
234 U.S. 548
United States v. Ohio Oil Company
UNITED STATES et al., Appts.,
v.
STANDARD OIL COMPANY.
No. 482.
UNITED STATES et al., Appts.,
v. STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF LOUISIANA.
No. 483.
UNITED STATES et al., Appts.,
v.
PRAIRIE OIL & GAS COMPANY.
No. 506.
UNITED STATES et al., Appts.,
v.
UNCLE SAM OIL COMPANY.
No. 507.
UNITED STATES et al., Appts.,
v.
ROBERT D. BENSON et al., Doing Business under the
Partnership Name of the Tide Water Pipe Company, Limited.
No. 508. Nos. 481, 482, 483, 506, 507, 508.
Argued and submitted October 15 and 16, 1914.
Decided June 22, 1914.
Solicitor General Davis for the United States.
Mr. Charles W. Needham for the Interstate Commerce Commission.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 549-553 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. John G. Milburn, Frank L. Crawford, and Walter F. Taylor M. F. Elliott for appellee in No. 481.
Messrs. John G. Milburn, Chester O. Swain, and for appellee in Nos. 482 and 483.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 554-557 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. W. S. Fitzpatrick, J. B. F. Cates, L. W. Keplinger, and C. W. Trickett for appellee in No. 506.
Mr. Albert L. Wilson for appellee in No. 507.
Messrs. W. I. Lewis, Archibald F. Jones, and R. R. Lewis for appellees in No. 508.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Ohio Power Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
353 U.S. 98
United States v. Ohio Power Company
Argued: April 1, 1957. ---
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Radio Corporation of America

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
358 U.S. 334
United States v. Radio Corporation of America
Argued: Dec. 8, 1958. --- Decided: Feb 24, 1959
Mr. Sol. Gen. J. Lee Rankin, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Mr. Bernard G. Segal, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.
Mr. Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Radio Corporation of America/Concurrence Harlan

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Harlan
United States Supreme Court
358 U.S. 334
United States v. Radio Corporation of America
Argued: Dec. 8, 1958. --- Decided: Feb 24, 1959
Mr. Justice HARLAN concurs in the result, believing, as he understands part 'I' of the Court's opinion to hold, that a Commission determination of 'public interest, convenience, and necessity' cannot either constitute a binding adjudication upon any antitrust issues that may be involved in the Commission's proceeding or serve to exempt a licensee pro tanto from the antitrust laws, and that these considerations alone are dispositive of this appeal.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER and Mr. Justice DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Ragen

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
314 U.S. 513
United States v. Ragen
Argued: Dec. 11, 1941. --- Decided: Jan 5, 1942
See 315 U.S. 826, 62 S.Ct. 620, 86 L.Ed. --.
Messrs. Francis Biddle, Atty. Gen., and Gordon B. Tweedy, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. John L. McInerney, of Chicago, Ill., for respondent Ragen.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 514-515 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Joseph A. Struett, of Chicago, Ill., for respondents Kruse.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Railroad Barnett

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinions

    Black
    Goldberg
United States Supreme Court
376 U.S. 681
United States v. Railroad Barnett
Argued: Oct. 21 and 22, 1963. --- Decided: April 6, 1964
See 377 U.S. 973, 84 S.Ct. 1642.
Archibald Cox, Sol. Gen., and Leon Jaworski, Houston, Tex., for the United States.
Malcolm B. Montgomery and Charles Clark, Jackson, Miss., for defendants.
Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Woodward

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
256 U.S. 632
United States v. Woodward
Argued: April 18, 1921. --- Decided: June 6, 1921
Messrs. Solicitor General Frierson and Frank Davis, Jr., of Columbus, Ohio, for the United States.
Mr. E. J. Smyer, of Birmingham, Ala., for appellees.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Workman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
68 U.S. 745
United States v. Workman

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Wormer/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
80 U.S. 25
United States v. Wormer
We think that the Court of Claims erred in its finding and judgment in this case. The government clearly had the right to prescribe regulations for the inspection of horses, and there was great need of strictness in this regard, for frauds were constantly perpetrated. We see nothing unreasonable in the regulations complained of. It is well known that horses may be prepared and fixed up to appear bright and smart for a few hours, and it was altogether reasonable that they should be placed in the government yard for the period required, and that no person interested in them should be permitted to manipulate them whilst under inspection. The branding was also a proper and necessary precaution to prevent the same horses being presented a second time after condemnation. The branding on the foot was of slight importance, and the brand on the shoulder was not to be applied except in cases of absolute fraud. A person guilty of fraud would have no right to complain of the regulation being carried into effect.
As the government had the right to prescribe all proper and reasonable regulations on the subject, and as the regulations prescribed do not seem to have been unreasonable, the claimant cannot complain. If he chose, under these circumstances, to fling up his contract, he must be content to suffer any incidental damage which he may have incurred in making preparations for its performance. It was a damage voluntarily sustained, and the maxim, volenti non fit injuria, applies to the case.
DECREE REVERSED, and the court below directed to
DISMISS THE PETITION.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Worley

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
281 U.S. 339
United States v. Worley
Argued: March 4, 5, 1930. --- Decided: April 14, 1930
Mr. Clarence T. Spier, of Omaha, Neb., for administratrix.
Mr. Claude R. Branch, of Providence, R. I., for the United States.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/15th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 109

Chap. CIX.—An Act supplementary to the several acts making appropriations for the year one thousand eight hundred and eighteen.
Sums appropriated.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the following sums be and they are hereby, respectively, appropriated, and shall be paid out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated:
For balances due several states.For the payment of balances due several states, on an adjustment of their accounts, for expenses incurred by calling out the militia during the late war, six thousand dollars.
Barracks at Baton Rouge.Towards erecting a barracks at Baton Rouge, forty thousand dollars.
For carrying into effect the treaty with the Cherokee Indians, eighty thousand dollars.Treaty with Cherokees.
Expenses of holding Indian treaties in 1818.For defraying the expenses of holding Indian treaties in the year one thousand eight hundred and eighteen, fifty-three thousand dollars.
Arrearages.For arrearages in the Indian department, thirty-five thousand dollars.
Pay of militia.For additional pay to the militia, fifty thousand dollars.
Mounted volunteers.For expenses of mounted volunteers, ninety thousand dollars.
Pensions under act of 1818, ch. 19.For pensions for one thousand eight hundred and eighteen, in addition to the sum already appropriated for that purpose, fifty thousand dollars.
For pensions to officers and soldiers of the revolutionary army, under the act of the eighteenth of March last, three hundred thousand dollars.Pensions to revolutionary officers and soldiers.
For deficiency in the appropriation for clerk hire, in the office of the Department of War, for the year one thousand eight hundred and seventeen, eight hundred dollars.Clerk hire in War Department.
For rent of offices for the above department, for the year one thousand eight hundred and seventeen, five hundred dollars.Rent of offices for War Department.
For office rent for the above department, for one thousand eight hundred and eighteen, one thousand dollars.
For additional clerk hire, a sum not exceeding fifty thousand dollars.
Approved, April 20, 1818.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/15th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 113

Chap. CXIII.—An Act making the port of Bath, in Massachusetts, a port of entry for ships or vessels arriving from the Cape of Good Hope, and from places beyond the same; and for establishing a collection district, whereof Belfast shall be the port of entry.
Bath, in Massachusetts, made a port of entry for vessels, &c. arriving from the Cape of Good Hope, &c.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the port of Bath, in the state of Massachusetts, be, and hereby is, made a port of entry for ships ​or vessels arriving from the Cape of Good Hope, and from places beyond the same.
A collection district established. A collector to reside at Belfast, &c.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That a collection district be and hereby is, established in the state of Massachusetts, which shall include all the ports and harbours on the western shore of the Penobscot bay and river, from the town of Camden to the town of Bangor, both inclusive; and a collector shall be appointed for the district, to reside at Belfast, which shall be the only port of entry for said district.
Approved, April 20, 1818.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/15th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 115

Chap. CXV.—An Act authorizing the disposal of certain lots of public ground in the city of New Orleans and town of Mobile.
The President may abandon the use of the navy, arsenal, military hospital and barracks in New Orleans, and of Fort Charlotte, at Mobile, and cause the ground whereon they stand to be laid off into lots, &c. A plat thereof to the Secretary of the Treasury, &c. The lots to be offered at public sale, &c.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States shall have power, and he is hereby authorized, whenever in his opinion it shall be consistent with the public interest, to abandon the use of the navy arsenal, military hospital, and barracks in the city of New Orleans, and of Fort Charlotte, at the town of Mobile; to cause the lots of ground whereon the said arsenal, hospital, and barracks in New Orleans, and Fort Charlotte, at Mobile, not stand, to be surveyed and laid off into lots, with suitable streets and avenues, conforming as near as may be, to the original plan of the city and town aforesaid; and when the surveys are completed, one plat thereof shall be returned to the Secretary of the Treasury, and another to such officer or agent as the President shall have authorized to dispose of the said lots; and the said lots of ground shall be offered at public sale at the city of New Orleans and town of Mobile respectively, on such day or days as the President shall, by his proclamation, designate for that purpose, in the same manner, and on the same conditions and terms of credit, as is provided by law for the sale of public lands of the United States, and patents shall be granted therefor, as for other public lands sold by the United States.
The President may cause Fort St. Charles to be demolished, and navy yard to be discontinued. A public square.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the President of the United States is hereby authorized, as soon as in his opinion the public interest will permit, to cause the fort of St. Charles to be demolished, and the navy yard in said city to be discontinued; and the lot of ground on which the said fort is erected shall be appropriated to the use of a public square, ​and may be improved for that purpose by order of the corporation of the said city.
Approved, April 20, 1818.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/15th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 123

Chap. CXXIII.—An Act for changing the compensation of receivers and registers of the land offices.
Instead of present compensation, receivers to be paid an annual salary of 500 dolls. each, and commission of one per cent. &c. Proviso.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That, instead of the compensation now allowed by law to the receivers of public moneys for the lands of the United States, they shall receive an annual salary of five hundred dollars each, and a commission of one per centum on the moneys received, as a compensation for clerk hire, receiving, safe keeping, and transmitting, such moneys to the treasury of the United States: Provided always, That the whole amount which any receiver of public moneys shall receive under the provisions of this act, shall not exceed, for any one year, the sum of three thousand dollars.
Registers to receive, each, 500 dolls. per annum and commission of one per cent. &c. Proviso.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That, instead of the compensation now allowed by law, to the registers of the land offices, they shall receive an annual salary of five hundred dollars each, and a commission of one per centum on all the moneys expressed in the receipts by them filed and entered, and of which they shall have transmitted an account to the Secretary of the Treasury; Provided always, That the whole amount which any register of the land offices shall receive, under the provisions of this act, shall not exceed, for any one year, the sum of three thousand dollars.
Approved, April 20, 1818.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/15th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 107

Chap. CVII.—An Act to continue in force, from and after the thirtieth of June, one thousand eight hundred and nineteen, until the thirtieth of June, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-six, the fourth paragraph of the first section of the act, entitled “An act to regulate duties on imports and tonnage.”
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the fourth paragraph ​Act of 1816, ch. 107. The 4th paragraph of the 1st section of the act to regulate duties on imports and tonnage continued until 30th June, 1826.of the first section of the act, entitled “An act to regulate the duties on imports and tonnage,” passed the twenty-seventh of April, one thousand eight hundred and sixteen, shall, from and after the thirtieth of June, one thousand eight hundred and nineteen, continue to operate in the same manner, and to have the same effect, until the thirtieth of June, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-six, that the above mentioned fourth paragraph now has, and will continue to have, until the thirtieth of June, one thousand eight hundred and nineteen, any law to the contrary notwithstanding.
Approved, April 20, 1818.