OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# USAMGIK Ordinance 49
## GOVERNMENT IN KOREA

Office of the Military Governor Seoul, Korea
ORDINANCE NUMBER 49
CONTROLLING AND RECORDING MOVEMENTS OF PERSONS ENTERING OR LEACING KOREA

## Military Governor of Korea.

This work is in the public domain because, according to Article 7 of the Copyright Act of South Korea, this work is not protected by copyright law. This following works are included:
* Constitution, laws, treaties, decrees, ordinances and rules;
* Notices, public notifications, directions and others similar to them issued by the state or local government;
* Judgments, decisions, orders, or rulings of courts, as well as rulings and decisions made by the administrative appeal procedures, or other similar procedures;
* Compilations or translations of works as referred to in Subparagraphs 1 to 3 which are produced by the state or local government; and
* Current news reports which transmit simple facts, and digital audio transmission
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# USAMGIK Ordinance 43
## Seoul, Korea

ORDINANCE NUMBER 43
DISSOLUTION OF THE CHOSUN STOCK EXCHANGE

## Military Governor of Korea.

This work is in the public domain because, according to Article 7 of the Copyright Act of South Korea, this work is not protected by copyright law. This following works are included:
* Constitution, laws, treaties, decrees, ordinances and rules;
* Notices, public notifications, directions and others similar to them issued by the state or local government;
* Judgments, decisions, orders, or rulings of courts, as well as rulings and decisions made by the administrative appeal procedures, or other similar procedures;
* Compilations or translations of works as referred to in Subparagraphs 1 to 3 which are produced by the state or local government; and
* Current news reports which transmit simple facts, and digital audio transmission
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# USAMGIK Ordinance 47
## GOVERNMENT IN KOREA

Office of the Military Governor Seoul, Korea
ORDINANCE NUMBER 47

## Military Governor of Korea.

This work is in the public domain because, according to Article 7 of the Copyright Act of South Korea, this work is not protected by copyright law. This following works are included:
* Constitution, laws, treaties, decrees, ordinances and rules;
* Notices, public notifications, directions and others similar to them issued by the state or local government;
* Judgments, decisions, orders, or rulings of courts, as well as rulings and decisions made by the administrative appeal procedures, or other similar procedures;
* Compilations or translations of works as referred to in Subparagraphs 1 to 3 which are produced by the state or local government; and
* Current news reports which transmit simple facts, and digital audio transmission
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# USAMGIK Ordinance 40
## Seoul, Korea

ORDINANCE NUMBER 40
SALE OF PROPERTY FOR TAX DELINQUENCY
* Laws relating to the sale of property for tax delinquency are continue in full force and effect, except as to the classes of property provided for in paragraphs 3 and 4 hereof. The proceeds of such sales will be deposited as provided by existing law. The portion of such proceeds which constitutes national taxes, as determined by the tax official, will be deposited for transmission to the Bank of Chosen, Seoul, for the account of the Military Government of Korea,
* In addition to reports of tax sales now required by existing law, the tax official, conducing such sales, will forward by registered mail a special report within ten (10) days after the date of the sale addressed to the Tax Section of the Financial Bureau of the Military Government of Korea, seoul. Where the consent of the Property Custodian is required, a copy of the same report will be sent by registered mail addressed to the property Custodian of the Military Government of Korea, seoul. The following information will be included in the special report : a. The Court and Order Number directing the sale. b. Name and address of former owner of property. c. Description of Property. d. Amount of taxes, interest, penalties, cost and fees, and amount of money received in excess thereof. e. Dates, amounts location and name of financial institution in which each deposit was made and other disposition of the proceeds.
* All property formerly owned by Japanese nationals (natural and juridical persons), became vested in the Military Government of Korea as of 25 September 1945 by Ordinance No. 33. Sales of such property for taxes is prohibited.
* The following classes of property will not be sold for taxes, except with the written consent of the Property Custodian : a. Property the transfer of which is prohibited by Ordinance No. 2. b. Property the ownership of which is unknown c. Property requisitioned by the Military Government of Korea, d. Abandoned property.
* Any person violating the provisions of this Ordinance will, upon conviction by a Military Occupation Court, suffer such punishment as the court shall determine.
* This Ordinance becomes effective at 2400, 10 January 1946.

## Military Governor of Korea.

This work is in the public domain because, according to Article 7 of the Copyright Act of South Korea, this work is not protected by copyright law. This following works are included:
* Constitution, laws, treaties, decrees, ordinances and rules;
* Notices, public notifications, directions and others similar to them issued by the state or local government;
* Judgments, decisions, orders, or rulings of courts, as well as rulings and decisions made by the administrative appeal procedures, or other similar procedures;
* Compilations or translations of works as referred to in Subparagraphs 1 to 3 which are produced by the state or local government; and
* Current news reports which transmit simple facts, and digital audio transmission
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# USAMGIK Ordinance 42
## Seoul, Korea

ORDINANCE NUMBER 42

## Military Governor of Korea.

This work is in the public domain because, according to Article 7 of the Copyright Act of South Korea, this work is not protected by copyright law. This following works are included:
* Constitution, laws, treaties, decrees, ordinances and rules;
* Notices, public notifications, directions and others similar to them issued by the state or local government;
* Judgments, decisions, orders, or rulings of courts, as well as rulings and decisions made by the administrative appeal procedures, or other similar procedures;
* Compilations or translations of works as referred to in Subparagraphs 1 to 3 which are produced by the state or local government; and
* Current news reports which transmit simple facts, and digital audio transmission
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# USAMGIK Ordinance 39
## Seoul, Korea

ORDINANCE NUMBER 39
REGULATIONS OF FOREIGN TRADE

## Military Governor of Korea.

This work is in the public domain because, according to Article 7 of the Copyright Act of South Korea, this work is not protected by copyright law. This following works are included:
* Constitution, laws, treaties, decrees, ordinances and rules;
* Notices, public notifications, directions and others similar to them issued by the state or local government;
* Judgments, decisions, orders, or rulings of courts, as well as rulings and decisions made by the administrative appeal procedures, or other similar procedures;
* Compilations or translations of works as referred to in Subparagraphs 1 to 3 which are produced by the state or local government; and
* Current news reports which transmit simple facts, and digital audio transmission
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Troy Bank of Troy Indiana v. G. A. Whitehead & Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
222 U.S. 39
Troy Bank of Troy Indiana v. G. A. Whitehead & Company
Argued: October 9, 1911. --- Decided: November 6, 1911
Messrs. George W. Jolly and B. F. Huffman for appellants.
Mr. Ben D. Ringo for appellee.
Mr. Justice Van Devanter delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Troxell v. Delaware Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
227 U.S. 434
Troxell v. Delaware Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company
Argued: January 14, 1913. --- Decided: February 24, 1913
Mr. George Demming for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. James F. Campbell, Daniel R. Reese, J. Hayden Oliver, and William S. Jenney for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 435-438 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Troy Iron and Nail Factory v. Odiorne

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
58 U.S. 72
Troy Iron and Nail Factory v. Odiorne
THIS was an appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the district of Massachusetts, sitting as a court of equity.
It was a bill filed by the Troy Iron and Nail Factory, a manufacturing corporation established in the State of New York, to restrain the Odiornes from infringing certain letters-patent granted to Henry Burden, on the 2d of September, 1840, and by him assigned to the complainant.
The respondents filed an answer, taking various grounds of defence, which it is not necessary, under the circumstances of the case, to particularize. At October term, 1851, the following stipulation was signed by the parties, and filed in the cause:--
The defendants agree not to deny the validity of the complainants' patent, provided they make out their title to the said letters-patent to be good.
They also agree not to deny that the machine complained of in the complainants' bill, is an infringement on the patent granted to H. Burden, on August 4, 1840. [Sept. 2.]
If the complainants shall establish their title to the letters-patent aforesaid, the proper decree may be entered for the complainants, unless the defendants shall prove that the spike machine used by them, and complained of in the bill aforesaid, was constructed prior to the alleged application of H. Burden, made April 18, 1839, for letters-patent therefor, according to the provisions of the statute of the United States, 1839, ch. 88, sec. 7; or was the result of an independent, original invention, prior in time to the invention of the said Burden; in either of which cases the proper decree shall be entered for defendants.
C. P. CURTIS, JR., Plaintiff's attorney.
J. A. ANDREW, for defendants.
Much testimony was taken upon the subjects involved, and in December, 1852, the circuit court dismissed the bill.
From this decree, the complainant appealed to this court.
The case was argued by Mr. George T. Curtis for the appellants; no counsel appearing for the appellee.
The argument upon the point upon which the court rested its decision, consisted of an examination of the evidence bearing upon it, which it is not necessary to state.
Mr. Justice CATRON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Travels and Discoveries in the Levant

* Volume 1
* Volume 2 (transcription project)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Union Pacific Railroad Company v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Union Pacific Railroad Company v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Union Pacific Railroad Company v. United States (99 U.S. 402)
* Union Pacific Railroad Company v. United States (104 U.S. 662)
* Union Pacific Railroad Company v. United States (362 U.S. 327)
See also United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company.
# Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Updike Grain Company

United States Supreme Court
222 U.S. 215
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Updike Grain Company
Argued: October 18, 1911. --- Decided: December 4, 1911
Messrs. Maxwell Evarts, F. C. Dillard, and Henry W. Clark for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Edward P. Smith and Constantine J. Smyth for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice Lamar delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Union Pacific Railroad Company v. United States (104 U.S. 662)

United States Supreme Court
104 U.S. 662
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. United States
APPEAL from the Court of Claims.
This was an action brought by the Union Pacific Railroad Company against the United States to recover compensation alleged to be due for services rendered from Jan. 1, 1876, to Sept. 30, 1877, in the transportation of the mails over its road, and of the employees accompanying them, who were charged with sorting, distributing, and delivering them.
The United States traversed the petition of the company, and set up a counterclaim for five per cent upon the amount of the net earnings of the company's road from Nov. 6, 1875, to Nov. 6, 1877.
The Court of Claims was of opinion that the compensation for that service was not to be determined by reference to the act of July 1, 1862, c. 120, but by the general laws regulating the compensation for similar service by other railway companies. It therefore adjudged and decreed as follows: That whereas the sum of $618,910.54 has been found to be due to the claimant from the defendants for the services alleged in its petition, of which it is entitled to recover a moiety, to wit, the sum of $309,455.27, pursuant to the act of 2d July, 1864, c. 216; and whereas the sum of $682,032.18 has been found to be due from the claimant to the defendants on the matters alleged in their plea of counterclaim, therefore the said moiety of $309,455.27 be set off against and deducted from the said sum found to be due the defendants, and the defendants recover from the claimant the balance remaining, to wit, the sum of $372,576.91.
The company thereupon appealed.
Mr. Sidney Bartlett for the appellant.
The Solicitor-General for the United States.
MR. JUSTICE MATTHEWS delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Union Pacific Railroad Company v. United States (362 U.S. 327)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
362 U.S. 327
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. United States (362 U.S. 327)
Argued: March 23, 1960. --- Decided: April 4, 1960
Appellant, along with other railroads, has for years engaged in the 'roller lumber traffic' by performing intentionally delayed service in the transportation of lumber from the West Coast to market. Six roads so engaged have filed tariffs covering such services at the same rate as their fast freight, and the Interstate Commerce Commission now has such tariffs under investigation and consideration. Appellant, however, has refused to file a tariff covering such service but continues to handle roller lumber traffic on the same tariff as its fast freight.
The United States, at the instance of the Interstate Commerce Commission, sought and obtained a permanent injunction restraining appellant from performing its roller lumber traffic service until it publishes and files a tariff covering the same. The District Court found that appellant renders a 14-day delayed lumber service over a route ordinarily requiring from two to four days. The delay is accomplished by the holding of cars on sidings at certain points on its trunk lines awaiting diversion orders to move the shipment forward over the railroad's regular service. This affords the shipper additional time to find a market for the lumber while it is in transit. This service, the District Court found, (173 F.Supp. 401) incurred additional 'operational problems and costs' for appellant, including switching, siding, storage and 'per diem cost for the use of foreign cars' not present in its fast freight service and not included in its published tariff. We agree with the District Court that such delayed service constitutes the furnishing of additional 'privileges or facilities' under § 6(7) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 6(7), and, therefore, must be published and filed in its tariff. 49 U.S.C. § 6(1), 49 U.S.C.A. § 6(1). See Turner, Dennis & Lowry Lumber Co. v. Chicago, M. & St. P.R. Co., 1926, 271 U.S. 259, 262, 46 S.Ct. 530, 531, 70 L.Ed. 934.
If and when appellant publishes and files such a tariff, as other roads have already done, the Commission can then consider the reasonableness and justness of appellant's service in the light of that rate, giving due regard to any unjust or unreasonable preferences or advantages that might result to shippers or other roads should the same not be approved.
Affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Union Pacific Railroad Company v. United States (362 U.S. 327)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
362 U.S. 327
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. United States (362 U.S. 327)
Argued: March 23, 1960. --- Decided: April 4, 1960
Mr. Elmer B. Collins, Omaha, Neb., for appellant.
Mr. John G. Laughlin, Washington, D.C., for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Union Tank Line v. Wright

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Pitney
United States Supreme Court
249 U.S. 275
Union Tank Line v. Wright
Argued: and Submitted Jan. 22, 1919. --- Decided: March 24, 1919
Mr. Douglas Campbell, of New York City, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Clifford Walker, of Monroe, Ga., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Union Stock Yard Transit Company of Chicago v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
308 U.S. 213
Union Stock Yard Transit Company of Chicago v. United States
Argued: Nov. 10-13, 1939. --- Decided: Dec 4, 1939
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
Messrs. Frederick H. Wood, of New York City, and Bryce L. Hamilton, and Guy A. Gladson, both of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Messrs. Frank Murphy, Atty. Gen., and Daniel W. Knowlton, of Washington, D.C., for appellees, the United States and Interstate Commerce Commission.
Mr. Lee J. Quasey, of Chicago, Ill., for appellee National Live Stock Marketing Ass'n.
Mr. Douglas F. Smith, of Chicago, Ill., for appellees Railroad Companies.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/2nd Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 4

Chap. IV.—An Act to continue in force for a limited time, and to amend the act intituled “An act providing the means of intercourse between the United States and foreign nations.”
Act providing intercourse with foreign nations continued. July 1, 1790, ch. 22. 1796, ch. 41.Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the act, intituled “An act providing the means of intercourse between the United States and foreign nations,” which would expire at the end of the present session of Congress, be, and the same hereby is, together ​with this act, continued in force for the space of one year, from the passing of this act, and from thence until the end of the session of Congress then, or next thereafter holden, and no longer.
Accounts thereof how and when furnished and settled.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That in all cases, where any sum or sums of money have issued, or shall hereafter issue, from the treasury, for the purposes of intercourse or treaty, with foreign nations, in pursuance of any law, the President shall be, and he hereby is authorized to cause the same to be duly settled annually with the accounting officers of the treasury, in manner following, that is to say; by causing the same to be accounted for, specifically, in all instances, wherein the expenditure thereof may, in his judgment, be made public; and by making a certificate or certificates, or causing the Secretary of State to make a certificate or certificates of the amount of such expenditures, as he may think it advisable not to specify; and every such certificate shall be deemed a sufficient voucher for the sum or sums therein expressed to have been expended.
Approved, February 9, 1793.