OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Georgia

United States Supreme Court
234 U.S. 280
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Georgia
Argued: April 17, 1913. --- Decided: June 8, 1914
Messrs. Henry L. Stone, Alfred P. Thom, Alexander Hamilton, and Robert C. Alston for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 281-284 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Thomas S. felder, Attorney General of Georgia, for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 284-286 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Florida (273 U.S. 730)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
273 U.S. 730
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Florida (273 U.S. 730)
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Florida denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. City of Goldsboro

United States Supreme Court
232 U.S. 548
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. City of Goldsboro
Argued: December 10, 1013. --- Decided: February 24, 1914
Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney, George B. Elliott, and George M. Rose for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 549 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Robert W. Winston, J. Crawford Biggs, D. C. Humphrey, J. D. Langston, and M. H. Allen for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Pitney delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Florida

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Florida."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Florida (203 U.S. 256)
* Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Florida (273 U.S. 730)
# Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Florida (273 U.S. 730)

United States Supreme Court
273 U.S. 730
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Florida (273 U.S. 730)
Messrs. W. E. Kay and Thos. B. Adams, both of Jacksonville, Fla. (Mr. Frank W. Gwathmey, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for petitioner Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
Messrs. Fred H. Davis, of Tallahassee, Fla., and George C. Bedell, of Jacksonville, Fla., for respondents.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Aunt Jane's Nieces Abroad/Chapter 5
### CHAPTER V VESUVIUS RAMPANT

It was Saturday night, the seventh day of April, nineteen hundred and six—a night never to be forgotten by those aboard the ship; a night which has its place in history.
At dinner the captain announced that he had dropped anchor at the Immacollatella Nuova, but at a safe distance from the shore, and that no passengers would be landed under any circumstances until the fall of ashes ceased and he could put his people ashore in a proper manner.
A spirit of unrest fell upon them all. Big Tom Horton whispered to Beth that he did not intend to leave her side until all danger was over. The deck was deserted, all the passengers crowding into the smoking room and saloons to escape the lava dust.
Few kept their rooms or ventured to sleep. At intervals a loud detonation from the volcano shook the air, and the mystery and awe of the enveloping gloom were so palpable as almost to be felt.
Toward midnight the wind changed, driving the cloud of ashes to the southward and sufficiently clearing the atmosphere to allow the angry glow of the crater to be distinctly seen. Now it shot a pillar of fire thousands of feet straight into the heavens; then it would darken and roll skyward great clouds that were illumined by the showers of sparks accompanying them.
The windows of every cabin facing the volcano were filled with eager faces, and in the smoking room Uncle John clasped Beth around the waist with one arm and Patsy with the other and watched the wonderful exhibition through the window with a grave and anxious face. Tom Horton had taken a position at one side of them and the dark Italian at the other. The latter assured Patsy they were in no danger whatever. Tom secretly hoped they were, and laid brave plans for rescuing Beth or perishing at her side. Louise chose to lie in her berth and await events with calm resignation. If they escaped she would not look haggard and hollow-eyed when morning came. If a catastrophy was pending she would have no power to prevent it.
It was four o'clock on Sunday morning when Vesuvius finally reached the climax of her travail. With a deep groan of anguish the mountain burst asunder, and from its side rolled a great stream of molten lava that slowly spread down the slope, consuming trees, vineyards and dwellings in its path and overwhelming the fated city of Bosco-Trecase.
Our friends marked the course of destruction by watching the thread of fire slowly wander down the mountain slope. They did not know of the desolation it was causing, but the sight was terrible enough to inspire awe in every breast.
The volcano was easier after that final outburst, but the black clouds formed thicker than ever, and soon obscured the sky again.
# Aunt Jane's Nieces Abroad/Prefatory
### PREFATORY

The author is pleased to be able to present a sequel to "Aunt Jane's Nieces," the book which was received with so much favor last year. Yet it is not necessary one should have read the first book to fully understand the present volume, the characters being taken to entirely new scenes.
The various foreign localities are accurately described, so that those who have visited them will recognize them at once, while those who have not been so fortunate may acquire a clear conception of them. It was my good fortune to be an eye witness of the recent great eruption of Vesuvius.
Lest I be accused of undue sensationalism in relating the somewhat dramatic Sicilian incident, I will assure my reader that the story does not exaggerate present conditions in various parts of the island. In fact, Il Duca and Tato are drawn from life, although they did not have their mountain lair so near to Taormina as I have ventured to locate it. Except that I have adapted their clever system of brigandage to the exigencies of this story, their history is truly related. Many who have travelled somewhat outside the beaten tracks in Sicily will frankly vouch for this statement.
Italy is doing its best to suppress the Mafia and to eliminate brigandage from the beautiful islands it controls, but so few of the inhabitants are Italians or in sympathy with the government that the work of reformation is necessarily slow. Americans, especially, must exercise caution in travelling in any part of Sicily; yet with proper care not to tempt the irresponsible natives, they are as safe in Sicily as they are at home.
Aunt Jane's nieces are shown to be as frankly adventurous as the average clear headed American girl, but their experiences amid the environments of an ancient and still primitive civilization are in no wise extraordinary.
Edith Van Dyne.
# Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club/Volume 35

* Bulletin
* OF THE
* Torrey Botanical Club
* VOL 35
* Founded by William Henry Leggett, 1870
* EDITOR
* MARSHALL AVERY HOWE
* ASSOCIATE EDITORS
* John Hendley BarnhartTracy Elliot Hazen
* Jean BroadhurstWilliam Alphonso Murrill
* Philip DowellCharles Louis Pollard
* Alexander William Evans  Herbert Maule Richards
* NEW YORK
* 1908
* Published for the Club
* The New Era Printing House
* Lancaster, Pa.
CONTENTS :
| Curtis, Carlton Clarence. | A biographical sketch of Lucien Marcus Underwood (portrait) | 1 |
| Howe, Marshall Avery. | Lucien Marcus Underwood: a memorial tribute | 13 |
| Barnhart, John Hendley. | The published work of Lucien Marcus Underwood | 17 |
| Britton, Nathaniel Lord. | Professor Underwood's relation to the work of the New York Botanical Garden | 39 |
# Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club/Volume 34
## Articles

* American Code of Botanical Nomenclature, No. 4, April 1907.
# Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club/Volume 30

* An Index to the described Species of Botrychium By Lucien Marcus Underwood
* The Genus Riella, with Descriptions of New Species from North America and the Canary Islands By Marshall Avery Howe & Lucien Marcus Underwood
# Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club/Volume 3

* JOHN TORREY
BULLETIN :
OF THE :
TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB :
VOLUMEIII. :
JANUARY, 1872 — DECEMBER, 1872. :
NEW YORK. :
1. :
| Number | 2, | February 1872 | 5. |
| Number | 3, | March 1872 | 9. |
| Number | 4, | April 1872 | 13. |
| Number | 5, | May 1872 | 17. |
| Number | 6, | June 1872 | 21. |
| Number | 7, | July 1872 | 25. |
| Number | 8, | August 1872 | 29. |
| Number | 9, | September 1872 | 33. |
| Number | 10, | October 1872 | 37. |
| Number | 11, | November 1872 | 41. |
| Number | 12, | December 1872 | 45. |
# Biblical commentary the Old Testament/Volume V. Greater Prophets

* Introduction to the Prophetical Books of the Old Testament
* Isaiah 1-27
* Isaiah 28-66
* Jeremiah 1-29
* Jeremiah 30-52
* Lamentations
* Ezekiel 1-28
* Ezekiel 29-48
# Burnham v. Superior Court of California, County of Marin/Concurrence Stevens

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions White Brennan Stevens
Justice STEVENS, concurring in the judgment.
As I explained in my separate writing, I did not join the Court's opinion in Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186, 97 S.Ct. 2569, 53 L.Ed.2d 683 (1977), because I was concerned by its unnecessarily broad reach. Id., at 217-219, 97 S.Ct., at 2586-2588 (opinion concurring in judgment). The same concern prevents me from joining either Justice SCALIA's or Justice BRENNAN's opinion in this case. For me, it is sufficient to note that the historical evidence and consensus identified by Justice SCALIA, the considerations of fairness identified by Justice BRENNAN, and the common sense displayed by Justice WHITE, all combine to demonstrate that this is, indeed, a very easy case. #fn-s Accordingly, I agree that the judgment should be affirmed.
# Burnham v. Superior Court of California, County of Marin/Concurrence White

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions White Brennan Stevens
Justice WHITE, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.
I join Parts I, II-A, II-B, and II-C of Justice SCALIA's opinion and concur in the judgment of affirmance. The rule allowing jurisdiction to be obtained over a nonresident by personal service in the forum State, without more, has been and is so widely accepted throughout this country that I could not possibly strike it down, either on its face or as applied in this case, on the ground that it denies due process of law guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. Although the Court has the authority under the Amendment to examine even traditionally accepted procedures and declare them invalid, e.g., Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U.S. 186, 97 S.Ct. 2569, 53 L.Ed.2d 683 (1977), there has been no showing here or elsewhere that as a general proposition the rule is so arbitrary and lacking in common sense in so many instances that it should be held violative of due process in every case. Furthermore, until such a showing is made, which would be difficult indeed, claims in individual cases that the rule would operate unfairly as applied to the particular nonresident involved need not be entertained. At least this would be the case where presence in the forum State is intentional, which would almost always be the fact. Otherwise, there would be endless, fact-specific litigation in the trial and appellate courts, including this one. Here, personal service in California, without more, is enough, and I agree that the judgment should be affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Burnham v. Bowen

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
111 U.S. 776
Burnham v. Bowen
John W. Cary, for appellants.
James Hagerman, D. B. Henderson, and F. B. Daniels, for appellee.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Avondale Marine Ways v. Henderson/Concurrence Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Douglas Burton
United States Supreme Court
346 U.S. 366
Avondale Marine Ways v. Henderson
Argued: Oct. 20, 1953. ---
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring.
I do not think this case belongs in the 'twilight zone' of Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Washington, 317 U.S. 249, 256, 63 S.Ct. 225, 229, 87 L.Ed. 246. Recovery was allowed under the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act for a death which occurred on a barge drawn up for repairs on a marine railway. Norton v. Vesta Coal Co., 3 Cir., 63 F.2d 165 was such a case and Judge Woolley dissented from a holding that a marine railway was not included in the statutory language, 'any dry dock'.
Mr. Justice REED took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Avril. Essays on the French Renaissance

* Charles of Orleans
* Villon
* Marot
* Ronsard
* Du Bellay
* Malherbe
# Avondale Marine Ways v. Henderson/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Douglas Burton
United States Supreme Court
346 U.S. 366
Avondale Marine Ways v. Henderson
Argued: Oct. 20, 1953. ---
The judgment is affirmed. Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Washington, 317 U.S. 249, 63 S.Ct. 225, 87 L.Ed. 246; Kaiser Co. v. Baskin, 340 U.S. 886, 71 S.Ct. 208, 95 L.Ed. 643; Baskin v. Industrial Accident Commission, 338 U.S. 854, 70 S.Ct. 99, 94 L.Ed. 523; Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Moore, 335 U.S. 874, 69 S.Ct. 239, 93 L.Ed. 417.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Burkard v. New York/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
388 U.S. 451
Kenneth BURKARD et al. v. NEW YORK.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Burk-Waggoner Oil Association v. Hopkins

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
269 U.S. 110
Burk-Waggoner Oil Association v. Hopkins
Argued: Oct. 20, 21, 1925. --- Decided: Nov 16, 1925
Messrs. Harry C. Weeks, of Wichita Falls, Tex., and Arnold R. Baar, of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, of New York City, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Burke's Speech on Conciliation with America/Index

INDEX TO NOTES
Abstract rights, 111, 118. Adams, John and Samuel, 117. Address to the king, 113. Administration of justice, 121. See Regulating Act, 116. American Revolution, Fiske, 121.
Bible, the, 114. Boston Port Bill, 121. Boston Tea Party, 114. Byron, 118.
Carolinas, 112. Castor, 119. Century Dictionary, 120. Charles I., 115. Charles Townshend, 112. Colonial governors, 112. Colony agents, 113. Competency, legal, 120. Complexions, 115. Continental Congress, 117. Cosmos, 120.
Duty on imports, 121.
English conquest, 119. English kings deposed, 119. Exempt from taxation, 112.
Fiske, American Revolution, 121. France, 115, 122. Fuller, Rose, 112.
George III., policy of, 113. Goodrich, Select British Eloquence, 117. Grand penal bill, 111. Great contests, 116. Green, History of the English People, 119.
Hamlet, 116, 122. Henry II., invasion of Ireland, 119. Henry VIII., act of, 118. Horace, Odes, 116, 119, 122.
Imports, duty on, 121. Ireland, 111; England's relation to, 119.
John Locke, 112. Johnson, Dr., 111. Julius Cæsar, 114.
Lord North, 113. Lord Rockingham, 111. Lords Marchers, 119. Lords of Trade, 112, 120, 121.
Magna Charta, 116. March, 119. Massachusetts, state of rebellion, 114; Colonial Assembly, 120. Milton, 114. More, Sir Thomas, Utopia, 120.
Newfoundland fisheries, 111. North, Lord, character of, 113.
Order of the Garter, 113. Othello, 121, 122.
Paine, Robert, 117. Paradise Lost, 115, 118. Pitt, 111. Plato, Republic, 120. Pollux, 119.
Ransom, proposition of, 121. See 112. Refined policy, 112. Regulating Act, 116. Revolution, 115. Roman charity, 115.
Shaftesbury, Earl of, 112. Shakespeare, 114. Sheriffs of Bristol, Burke's letter to, 118. Slave trade, 118. Spain, 122. Stamp Act, 111, 112, 120. Stuarts, House of, 115.
Taxation, 112. Theory, Burke's impatience with 120. Townshend, Charles, 112. Trade laws, 119. Trial of Treasons, 118, 121.
Virgil, Eclogues, 114. Virginia, Assembly of, 118.
Welsh, the, 119. Whigs, 115. William and Mary, 115.
Printed in the United States of America.
# Burkard v. New York

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
388 U.S. 451
Kenneth BURKARD et al. v. NEW YORK.
Henry HABEL et al.
v.
NEW YORK.
No. 808.
Appeals from the Court of Appeals of New York.
Victor Rabinowitz, Leonard B. Boudin and Samuel A. Neuberger for appellants Kenneth Burkard and others.
Edward Bennett Williams and Raymond W. Bergan for appellants Henry Habel and others.
Frank S. Hogan, for appellee.
June 2, 1967.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Calvary

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Calvary."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Calvary", by Frank Oliver Call
* "Calvary" (1895), by William Dean Howells
* Calvary (1886), by Octave Mirbeau (tr. Louis Rich)
* Calvary, by Edwin Arlington Robinson
* "Calvary", by Richard Cumberland
# Calvary (Mirbeau)

CALVARY
CALVARY (A Novel)
By Octave Mirbeau Member of the Goncourt Academy
Translated by Louis Rich
New York
Lieber & Lewis
MCMXXII
Copyright, 1922, By LIEBER & LEWIS
PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CALVARY
* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
* Chapter VII
* Chapter VIII
* Chapter IX
* Chapter X
* Chapter XI
* Chapter XII
TYPOGRAPHY AND PRINTING BY THE ULLMAN PRESS, INC., N. Y.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Calumet Grain Elevator Company v. Chicago

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
188 U.S. 431
Calumet Grain Elevator Company v. Chicago
Argued: December 19, 1902. --- Decided: February 23, 1903
Messrs. Warren B. Wilson and S. A. Lynde for appellant.
Messrs. Charles M. Walker and Henry Schofield for appellee.
Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Calton v. Utah

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
130 U.S. 83
Calton v. Utah
Arthur Brown and John H. Mitchell, for plaintiff in error.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Calumet Grain Elevator Company v. Chicago/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
188 U.S. 431
Calumet Grain Elevator Company v. Chicago
Argued: December 19, 1902. --- Decided: February 23, 1903
This case relates to the construction of a dock in Calumet river, on or in front of land belonging to the appellant. The facts upon which that company principally bases its claims for relief are those upon which the plaintiffs relied in Cummings v. Chicago, just decided. 187 U.S. --, ante, 472, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 472. Upon the authority of the decision in that case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cargoes

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
QUINQUIREME of Nineveh from distant Ophir, Rowing home to haven in sunny Palestine, With a cargo of ivory, And apes and peacocks, Sandalwood, cedarwood, and sweet white wine.
Stately Spanish galleon coming from the Isthmus, Dipping through the Tropics by the palm-green shores, With a cargo of diamonds, Emeralds, amethysts, Topazes, and cinnamon, and gold moidores.
Dirty British coaster with a salt-caked smoke-stack, Butting through the Channel in the mad March days, With a cargo of Tyne coal, Road-rails, pig-lead, Firewood, iron-ware, and cheap tin trays.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1967, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 56 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cargill Company v. Minnesota Railroad Warehouse Commission

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
180 U.S. 452
Cargill Company v. Minnesota Railroad Warehouse Commission
Argued: and Submitted December 3, 4, 1900. --- Decided: March 5, 1901
Mr. Ralph Whelan for plaintiff in error.
Mr. W. B. Douglass submitted the case for defendant in error, and Mr. W. J. Donahower was with him on the brief.
Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse