OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Representative women of New England/Marie W. Laughton

​MARIE WARE LAUGHTON was born in Lewiston, Me., at the home of her parents, Warren Preston and Elizabeth Foss (Prentiss) Laughton. Her paternal grandparents were John and Amata (Greenleaf) Laughton. Another John Laughton, her ancestor of an earlier generation, was a minute-man in the Revolution. Through her grandmother Amata, daughter of Joshua Greenleaf, Miss Laughton traces her ancestry back to Edmund Greenleaf (believed to have been of Huguenot stock), who settled in Newbury, Mass., in 1635. Her line, like the poet John Greenleaf Whittier's, continued through Etlmund's son Stephen, who married Elizabeth, daughter of Tristram Coffin.
Miss Laughton's maternal grandparents were Philo and Matilda (Foss) Prentiss. Her great- grandfather, Valentine Prentiss, served as Sergeant in the Revolutionary army. After the war he removed from Woodbury, Conn., to China, Me. He was a lineal descendant of Valentine Prentise, who joined the church in Roxbury in 1632.
Marie Ware Laughton, after her graduation from the Lewiston High School, attended the Normal Practice School in that city, from which she received her teacher'.? diploma in 1881. She then taught for six years in the Lewiston public schools. During the latter part of this time she took up the study of elocution. In the following year she was granted leave of absence to attend the Boston School of Oratory, where she was graduated in 1888. She has studied extensively with the best specialists in the country.
After continuing her work of teaching in Maine for several years, she came to Boston to teach in the Boston College of Oratory, and in 1896 she founded the School of English ​Speech and Expression, of which she is principal. The aim of this school is to give instruction in higher English and in the art of expression. Its marked success proves that public speakers, readers, and teachers of reading and elocution in public schools and colleges appreciate a school conducted by teachers who present sound methods. The school also meets the need of many who have no thought of entering a profession, but who realize the value of training for the development of power and for the opening up of new and enduring fields of culture.
Miss Laughton has been identified with several clubs and with the Daughters of the American Revolution, being the first woman in Massachusetts to hold the office of State Vice-Regent of the Society. She is the founder and is now Regent of the Committee of Safety Chapter, D. A. R., of Boston.
# Representative women of New England/Marion A. MacBride

​MARION A. MacBRIDE, journalist, widely known through the country for her work in the field of domestic science and for her philanthropic efforts in connection with the Woman's Christian Temperance Union, is a native of Easthampton, Mass. Her ancestors, the Snows and Warners, have lived in Williamsburg, Mass., since 1731. Solomon Snow and Jonathan Warner responded to the Lexington alarm of April 19, 1775, marching from Hampshire County to the defence of the country.
Mrs. MacBride was educated in New York, but her home for the greater part of her life has been in Boston. Her first newspaper work was done for the New York Tribune in 1881, and since that time her name has been prominent in the field of journalism. From 1881 to 1885 she was a reporter and correspondent of the Boston Post, but for the past fifteen years she has given more time to magazine work. A regular contributor to the columns of the Boston Daily Globe, New York Herald, New Orleans Picayune, Cleveland Plain Dealer, and St. Louis Chronicle, she has also conducted a department in the American Art Magazine, has written articles for the Decorator and Furnisher, and has filled important positions on the leading periodicals devoted to domestic science.
Mrs. MacBride is noted for her ability as an organizer. At the Cotton Centennial Exposition in 1885 she organized the National Woman's Press Association, which became international in 1887. The Woman's Press Association of Ohio, the Southern Woman's Press Association, and the New England Woman's Press Association were all called into existence largely through her personal efforts.
Mrs. MacBride organized the first woman's department of the New England Manufacturers' and Mechanics' Institute Fair held in Boston early in the eighties, and was also organizer and first superintendent of the woman's department of the Massachusetts Charitable Mechanic Association. Long the faithful secretary of the Woman's Charity Club, she was presented by its members in 1890 with a handsome gold watch and badge.
As an honorary member of the Massachusetts Army Nurses Association, Mrs. MacBride was prominent in arranging for the reception at Memorial Hall, State House, Boston, August 17, 1904, during the National Encampment of the Grand Army of the Republic.
Mrs. MacBride is a national superintendent of the W. C. T. U. She is never too busy to consider all sorts of demands made upon her time and strength, provided they have a worthy object. She was one of the first and most efficient workers for the police matron measure in Boston. For several years Mrs. MacBride has pas.setl her winters in Philadelphia, where her only child, James D. MacBride, follows the profession of draftsman which he learned in Glasgow, Scotland.
# Representative women of New England/Martha E. F. Mann

​MARTHA ELIZABETH FOSS MANN, M.D., a well-established medical practitioner in Boston, was born in this city, March 9, 1848, daughter of Charles Meade and Martha Eiizabeth (Hatchman) Foss. Her father, who was for many years a prosperous jeweller in Boston, came of the old New Hampshire Foss family. Dr. Mann's great-grandfather Foss was a Revolutionary soldier, enlisting at Rye, N.H., and serving under General Stark at the battle of Bennington. At the cIose of the war he took u|i laml in Meredith, N.H., where he subsecjueutly resided until his death. A maternal ancestor, John Hatchman, was also a Revolutionary soldier; and through these valiant and patriotic men Dr. Mann holds membership in the Daughters of the American Revolution, belonging to Boston Tea Party Chapter. The subject of this sketch was educated in the public schools of Boston and at one of the leading private schools, where, after being graduated from the high school, she continued her studies for four years.
On February 22, 1871, she married Dr. Benjamin Houstcjn Mann, a graduate of the Harvard Medical School and a soldier in the Twenty-fourth Massachusetts Infantry during the Civil War. Four children we're born of this marriage, all sons, namely: Benjamin Percy, November 9, 1871; Charles Foss, April 23, 1873, who died April 4, 1877; Houston, December 31, 1875; and Arthur Meade, February 5, 1879.
In 1881 Dr. Benjamin H. Mann died; and his widow, with her three children, returned to her father's home. Deciding to adopt the medical profession, she entered Boston University in 1882, received her degree in 1885, and immediately began practice in Boston. For seven years she was the assistant of the eminent Dr. Horace Packard in his private practice and hospital work. Dr. Mann has served for five years as secretary of the Boston Homœopathic Medical Society, was vice-president of the Boston Gynæcological Society, was president of the Twentieth Century Medical Society, is a member of the American Institute of Homoeopathy and of the Massachusetts Homœopathic Medical Society, and is instructor and lecturer at Boston University.
From her youth Dr. Mann has been a member of the Congregational church, but she attaches more importance to daily works than to creed. Though possessing much natural aptitude for her profession, which was fostered by her association with her husband, her success has been due to concentration of purpose and unceasing labor rather than to any fortuitous circumstances.
# Scholle v. Hare

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Clark

## Dissenting Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
369 U.S. 429
Scholle v. Hare
Theodore Sachs, for appellant.
Paul L. Adams, Atty. Gen. of Michigan, Joseph R. Bilitzke, Sol. Gen., Samuel J. Torina, former Sol. Gen., Stanton S. Faville, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Leon S.C.ohan, Deputy Atty. Gen., and G. Douglas Clapperton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee James M. Hare.
Edmund E. Shepherd, for appellee Frank D. Beadle, and others.
Melvin Nord and Harold Norris, for appellant, as amici curiae.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Schon v. Schon

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
358 U.S. 41
Schon v. Schon
Arthur A. Schon, pro se.
Mr. Sanford M. Swerdlin, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Scholey v. Rew

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
90 U.S. 331
Scholey v. Rew

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Scholle v. Hare/Concurrence Clark

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Clark
* Dissenting Opinion Harlan
United States Supreme Court
369 U.S. 429
Scholle v. Hare
Mr. Justice CLARK and Mr. Justice STEWART, concurring.
If we were able to read the several opinions in the Michigan Supreme Court the way our Brother HARLAN does, we would find much to persuade us that this case should not be remanded. But the state court opinions are not that clear to us. A careful reading of the opinions leaves us with the fixed impression that all but three members of the Michigan court were convinced that, whatever the underlying merits of the appellant's Equal Protection claim, it was, in the words of one of the justices, 'not enforcible in the courts.' 360 Mich. 1, 112, 104 N.W.2d 63. 121. In Baker v. Carr we held that such a claim is judicially cognizable. Accordingly, we join in the Court's order remanding this case to the Supreme Court of Michigan.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
The present order of course reflects no views on the merits of the appellant's Equal Protection claim. It may well turn out that the assertion of invidious discrimination is not borne out by the record. Today's order simply reflects out belief that the Michigan Supreme Court should be the first to consider the merits of the federal constitutional claim, free from any doubts as to its justiciability.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Scholle v. Hare/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Clark
* Dissenting Opinion Harlan
United States Supreme Court
369 U.S. 429
Scholle v. Hare
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Michigan for further consideration in the light of Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 82 S.Ct. 691, 7 L.Ed.2d 663.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Riddell v. Monolith Portland Cement Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
371 U.S. 537
Riddell v. Monolith Portland Cement Company
Argued: Jan. 14, 1963. --- Decided: Feb 25, 1963
See 372 U.S. 932, 83 S.Ct. 871.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Richter v. Jerome (123 U.S. 233)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
123 U.S. 233
Richter v. Jerome
The argument of counsel for the appellants seems to proceed on the ground that there are two equities growing out of the mortgage to the trust company, which may be dealt with in two separate suits, as they are separate and distinct in their character. One he calls the mortgagor's equity, consisting of the rights of the canal company in the lands growing out of the contract by Anthony for their sale to the Averys, Wild, and Conant. This equity, if we understand counsel correctly, it is conceded was sold under the proceedings for foreclosure, and now belongs to the purchaser. The other he denominates the 'bondholders' equity,' and it arises out of the purchase by Ayer from Anthony of his rights under the contract with the state of Michigan for building the wagon road when he (Ayer) had knowledge of the former contract under which the canal company could have perfected its title to the unpatented lands included in the mortgage, if he had not interfered. Under this equity counsel say they now seek to recover for the bondholders 'only the profits which Ayer made by stepping into Anthony's shoes in the premises.'
We are unable to see how these two equities, if there are two, can be separated in the way contemplated. They both grow out of the canal company's rights under the contract between Anthony and the Averys, Wild, and Conant. If the canal company could not recover from Ayer, neither the bond holders nor their trustee in the mortgage can. The title upon which their right of recovery rests, if such a right ever existed at all, was in the trust company, as the trustee of their security, at the time the original foreclosure was had, and it was part of the mortgagor's equity which was sold. It was then what this bill seeks to make it now, part of the security of the bondholders under the trust company mortgage, and, being such, it passed with the rest to the purchaser at that sale.
Something is also said in the argument about the equitable claims of the bondholders upon Ayer as the successor of Anthony, growing out of the false representations made to them as to the title of the lands covered by the mortgage when they paid the money and took their bonds; but all such claims come from the mortgage, as to which, in all proceedings for foreclosure, they are represented by their trustee when its interests are not in conflict with theirs. All the equities now asserted were proper subjects for adjudication in the former suit, if they existed. They formed part and parcel of the security which was then enforced, and, not being excepted from the sale, passed by it.
This makes it unnecessary to consider whether there was such fraud on the part of Anthony as to charge the lands in the hands of Ayer, even if the trust company were now proceeding against him under the mortgage. The decree is affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rickey Land Cattle Company v. Miller & Lux Rickey Land & Cattle Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
218 U.S. 258
Rickey Land Cattle Company v. Miller & Lux Rickey Land & Cattle Company
Argued: January 18, 19, 1910. --- Decided: for reargument January 31, 1910
Messrs. James F. Peck, Charles C. Boynton, and Frederick D. McKenney for petitioner.
Messrs. Aldis B. Browne, Alexander Britton, Frank H. Short, Isaac Frohman, Edward F. Treadwell, and W. B. Treadwell for respondents.
Mr. James F. Peck for petitioner on reargument.
Messrs. Edward F. Treadwell, Aldis B. Browne, and Alexander Britton for respondents on reargument.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ricker v. Powell

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
100 U.S. 104
Ricker v. Powell
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Submitted on printed arguments by Mr. Melville W. Fuller and Mr. W. C. Goudy for the appellant, and by Mr. Edward S. Isham, Mr. Julius Rosenthal, and Mr. A. M. Pence for the appellee.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rickert Rice Mills v. Fontenot

United States Supreme Court
297 U.S. 110
Rickert Rice Mills v. Fontenot
Argued: Dec. 16, 17, 1935. --- Decided: Jan 13, 1936
Messrs. John P. Bullington and Homer L. Bruce, both of Houston, Tex., Morris B. Redmann, of New Orleans, La., and C. A. McCoy, of Lake Charles, La., for petitioners.
Mr. Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Select Historical Documents of the Middle Ages/Book IV/First Deposition and Banning of Henry IV. by Gregory VII.

​7. First Deposition and Banning of Henry IV. by Gregory VII., February 22, 1076.
O St. Peter, chief of the apostles, incline to us, I beg, thy holy ears, and hear me thy servant whom thou hast nourished from infancy, and whom, until this day, thou hast freed from the hand of the wicked, who have hated and do hate me for my faithfulness to thee. Thou, and my mistress the mother of God, and thy brother St. Paul are witnesses for me among all the saints that thy holy Roman church drew me to its helm against my will; that I had no thought of ascending thy chair through force, and that; I would rather have ended my life as a pilgrim than, by secular means, to have seized thy throne for the sake of earthly glory. And therefore I believe it to be through thy grace and not through my own deeds that it has pleased and does please thee that the Christian people, who have been especially committed to thee, should obey me. And especially to me, as thy representative and by ​thy favour, has the power been granted by God of binding and loosing in Heaven and on earth. On the strength of this belief therefore, for the honour and security of thy church, in the name of Almighty God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost, I withdraw, through thy power and authority, from Henry the king, son of Henry the emperor, who has risen against thy church with unheard of insolence, the rule over the whole kingdom of the Germans and over Italy. And I absolve all Christians from the bonds of the oath which they have made or shall make to him; and I forbid any one to serve him as king. For it is fitting that he who strives to lessen the honour of thy church should himself lose the honour which belongs to him. And since he has scorned to obey as a Christian, and has not returned to God whom he had deserted—holding intercourse with the excommunicated; practising manifold iniquities; spurning my commands which, as thou dost bear witness, I issued to him for his own salvation; separating himself from thy church and striving to rend it—I bind him in thy stead with the chain of the anathema. And, leaning on thee, I so bind him that the people may know and have proof that thou art Peter, and above thy rock the Son of the living God hath built His church, and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it.
# Shop Management/Preface

PREFACE
"SHOP MANAGEMENT" is a handbook for those interested in the management of industrial enterprises and in the production of goods. It was first published in 1903, under the auspices of The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, having been read at a meeting of that society held at Saratoga, N. Y., in June of that year.
The growing interest in scientific management on the part of the lay public has seemed to call for a new edition of this book. The demands upon the author's time have been such as to preclude his personally giving much attention to seeing the book through the press. No material changes in the text have been found necessary. At several points words have been added to make the author's meaning clear to those with no technical knowledge of the subject. A number of inconsistencies as between the text and the tables and figures have been removed; some minor additions to the time-study data have been made; the illustrations have been redrawn or reset, and a comprehensive index appended. That part of the discussion of the monograph which took place at the meeting at which it was presented, and which seemed pertinent, has been worked in with the text. "The Principles of Scientific Management," published uniform with this book, is simply an argument ​for Mr. Taylor's Philosophy of Human Labor,—an outline of the fundamental principles on which it rests. In "Shop Management," however, the effort is made to describe the organization and some of the mechanisms by means of which this philosophy and these principles can be made effective in the workshop, or on the market place.
Mr. Taylor has written "Shop Management" in such a way that everything in it should be intelligible to any one with a high school education. It is the general testimony, however, of those who have used the book in actual practice that, with each re-reading, a larger significance attaches to its industrial program.
We are indebted to Mr. Calvin W. Rice, the distinguished Secretary of The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, for his encouragement in bringing out this new edition of "Shop Management."
The Editor.
May, 1911.
# Shop Talks on Economics

Shop Talks
on
Economics
By MARY E. MARCY
CHARLES H. KERR & COMPANY
Publishers - Chicago
SHOP TALKS
ON
ECONOMICS
BY
MARY E. MARCY
AUTHOR OF RHYMES OF EARLY JUNGLE FOLK
CHICAGO
CHARLES H. KERR & COMPANY
CO-OPERATIVE
Copyright 1911
BY CHARLES H. KERR & COMPANY
CONTENTS.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# She's fair an' fause/The banks of Doon

Banks o' Doon.
YE banks and braes o' bonny Doon, How can you bloom sae fresh and fair? How can ye chant ye little birds, While I’m sae weary—fu' o care, Ye’ll break my heart ye little birds, That warble on the flow’ry thorn; Ye mind me o’ departed joys, Departed, never to return.
Aft hae I roam’d by bonny Doon, To see the rose and woodbine twine, Where ilka bird sung o'er its note, And cheerfully I join'd wi' mine. Wi' heartsome glee I gaed to pu' A rose out o' yon thorny tree: But my fause love had stown the rose, And ah! he’s left the thorn to me.
O blaw, ye flowers, your bonny blooms, and draw the wild birds by the burn, ​For Lubin promis'd me a ring, and ye maun aid me should I mourn, Ah, na, na, na, ye needna bloom, my een are dim and drowsy worn, Ye bonny birds ye needna sing, for Lubia never will return.
Ye roses blaw your bonny blooms, And draw the wild birds by the burn, Where oft I drop the silent tear, For him that never will return. Sweet birds I ken ye'll pity me, And join me wi' a plaintive sang, While echo wakes, and joins the mane I mak for him I loe’d sae lang,
FINIS.