OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Under Ben Bulben

I Swear by what the sages spoke Round the Mareotic Lake That the Witch of Atlas knew, Spoke and set the cocks a-crow.
Swear by those horsemen, by those women Complexion and form prove superhuman, That pale, long-visaged company That air in immortality Completeness of their passions won; Now they ride the wintry dawn Where Ben Bulben sets the scene.
Here's the gist of what they mean.
II Many times man lives and dies Between his two eternities, That of race and that of soul, And ancient Ireland knew it all. Whether man die in his bed Or the rifle knocks him dead, A brief parting from those dear Is the worst man has to fear. Though grave-digger's toil is long, Sharp their spades, their muscles strong, They but thrust their buried men Back in the human mind again.
III You that Mitchel's prayer have heard, "Send war in our time, O Lord!" Know that when all words are said And a man is fighting mad, Something drops from eyes long blind, He completes his partial mind, For an instant stands at ease, Laughs aloud, his heart at peace. Even the wisest man grows tense With some sort of violence Before he can accomplish fate, Know his work or choose his mate.
IV Poet and sculptor, do the work, Nor let the modish painter shirk What his great forefathers did, Bring the soul of man to God, Make him fill the cradles right.
Measurement began our might: Forms a stark Egyptian thought, Forms that gentler Phidias wrought, Michael Angelo left a proof On the Sistine Chapel roof, Where but half-awakened Adam Can disturb globe-trotting Madam Till her bowels are in heat, Proof that there's a purpose set Before the secret working mind: Profane perfection of mankind.
Quattrocento put in paint On backgrounds for a God or Saint Gardens where a soul's at ease; Where everything that meets the eye, Flowers and grass and cloudless sky, Resemble forms that are or seem When sleepers wake and yet still dream, And when it's vanished still declare, With only bed and bedstead there, That heavens had opened.
Gyres run on; When that greater dream had gone Calvert and Wilson, Blake and Claude, Prepared a rest for the people of God, Palmer's phrase, but after that Confusion fell upon our thought.
V Irish poets, learn your trade, Sing whatever is well made, Scorn the sort now growing up All out of shape from toe to top, Their unremembering hearts and heads Base-born products of base beds. Sing the peasantry, and then Hard-riding country gentlemen, The holiness of monks, and after Porter-drinkers' randy laughter; Sing the lords and ladies gay That were beaten into clay Through seven heroic centuries; Cast your mind on other days That we in coming days may be Still the indomitable Irishry.
VI Under bare Ben Bulben's head In Drumcliff churchyard Yeats is laid. An ancestor was rector there Long years ago, a church stands near, By the road an ancient cross. No marble, no conventional phrase; On limestone quarried near the spot By his command these words are cut:
Cast a cold eye On life, on death. Horseman, pass by!
# Unconventional Warfare Pocket Guide/UW Phase VII: Transition

​UW Phase VII: Transition
​Activities
* Promote New Government Legitimacy
* Transition from SOJTF to Security Forces Assistance (SFA)
* Demobilize and Integrate Guerrilla Forces, Underground and Auxiliary
* Provide Civil-Military Operations (CMO) Support to New Government
* MISO Themes Promote and Reinforce Civil Governance
* Be Prepared to Conduct FID/COIN
* Shadow Government and Government-in-Exile Transition Responsibility for Civil Governance
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Allen

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Allen."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Allen (123 U.S. 345)
* United States v. Allen (163 U.S. 499)
* United States v. Allen (192 U.S. 543)
* United States v. Allen (203 U.S. 476)
* United States v. Allen (261 U.S. 317)
# United States v. Allen-Bradley Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
352 U.S. 306
United States v. Allen-Bradley Company
Argued: Dec. 13, 1956. --- Decided: Jan 22, 1957
Mr. Hilbert P. Zarky, Washington, D.C., for the petitioner.
Mr. Harvey W. Peters, Milwaukee, Wis., for the respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Allegheny County

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
322 U.S. 174
United States v. Allegheny County
Argued and Submitted Feb. 29 and March 1, 1944.
Decided May 1, 1944.
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania.
Mr. Chas. Fahy, of Washington, D.C., Sol. Gen., for appellant the United States.
Messrs. Elder W. Marshall and Carl E. Glock, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant Mesta Machine Co.
Mr. Edward G. Bothwell, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.
Miss Anne X. Alpern, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for The Member Cities of The National Institute of Municipal Law Officers, amicus curiae, by special leave of Court.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Allen (123 U.S. 345)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
123 U.S. 345
United States v. Allen

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Allen (163 U.S. 499)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
163 U.S. 499
United States v. Allen
Asst. Atty. Gen. Whitney, for the United States.
L. E. Payson and J. F. Evans, for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/5th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 5

Chap. Ⅴ.—An Act in addition to an act, entitled “An act concerning the registering and recording of Ships and Vessels.”
Act of Dec. 31, 1792, ch. 1. Vessels of U. States captured and condemned under any foreign power, or sold to a foreigner, shall not receive a new register. Proviso.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That no ship or vessel which has been, or shall be registered, pursuant to any law of the United States, and which hereafter shall be seized, or captured and condemned under the authority of any foreign power, or that shall by sale become the property of a foreigner or foreigners, shall, after the passing of this act, be entitled to, or capable of receiving, a new register, notwithstanding such ship or vessel should afterwards become American property; but that all such ships and vessels shall be taken and considered, to all intents and purposes, as foreign vessels: Provided, that nothing in this act contained, shall extend to, or be construed to affect the person or persons owning any ship or vessel, at the time of the seizure, or capture of the same, or shall prevent such owner, in case he regain a property in such ship or vessel, so condemned, by purchase or otherwise, from claiming and receiving a new register for the same, as he might or could have done, if this act had not been passed.
Approved, June 27, 1797.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/5th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 6

Chap. Ⅵ.—An Act directing the appointment of Agents, in relation to the sixth article of the Treaty of Amity, Commerce and Navigation, between the United States and Great Britain.
Agent to be appointed to act on part United States, under direction of Attorney General, before the commissioners under sixth article of treaty with Great Britain. Duty of Attorney General herein;Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be, and hereby is authorized, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to appoint a proper person to act in behalf of the United States, under the direction of the Attorney General, in relation to such claims as may be made against the United States, before the commissioners appointed to carry into effect the sixth article of the treaty of amity, commerce and navigation, between the United States of America and his Britannic Majesty. And it shall be the duty of the Attorney General, to counsel such agent, and to attend before the said commissioners, whenever any questions of law, or fact, to be determined by them, shall render his assistance necessary.
authorized to employ agents in different parts of the U. States.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the Attorney General be and is hereby authorized to employ such agents, in different parts of the United States, as the business before the said commissioners, in his opinion, shall make necessary, to be paid according to their services, at such rate as the President of the United States shall direct.
Additional compensation.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That during the continuance of the service to be performed under this act, the Attorney General shall be entitled to an additional compensation of six hundred dollars per annum; and the person hereby directed to be appointed, to a compensation at the rate of two thousand dollars per annum.
Appropriation.Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That for enabling the President of the United States, to defray the expenses to be incurred under, and by this act, a sum not exceeding ten thousand dollars, be, and hereby is appropriated, to be paid out of any monies not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, June 30, 1797.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/5th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 3

Chap. Ⅲ.—An Act to provide for the further Defence of the Ports and Harbors of the United States.
Appropriation of $115,000 for fortifying ports; Post, p. 554.Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That for fortifying certain ports and harbors of the United States, there be appropriated a sum not exceeding one hundred and fifteen thousand dollars.
Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the said appropriation shall be paid and discharged out of the surplus of the revenue and income, beyond the appropriations heretofore charged thereon.
Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That the President of the United States be, and he is hereby empowered to authorize any of the states which were found indebted to the United States in a settlement of the ​out of which funds payable debtor states may expend under direction of the President, the sums due from them, provided they cede the lands.accounts between them and the respective states, to expend under his direction the sums respectively due from them in fortifying their ports and harbors; and the sums which may be so expended shall be passed to the credit of the said states, on account of the balances found and reported by the commissioners for settling the accounts between the United States and the individual states, to be due from the said states to the United States. Provided, the said states shall and do cede to the United States the lands or places on which such fortifications shall be so erected, in cases where the lands are the property of such states.
Approved, June 23, 1797.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/5th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 8

Chap. Ⅷ.—An Act to ascertain the time for the next meeting of Congress, and to repeal the act heretofore passed for that purpose.
Congress to meet second Monday in Nov. 1797.Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That after the end of the present session, the next meeting of Congress shall be on the second Monday of November in the present year.
Ante, p. 507.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the act intituled “An act ​to alter the time for the next meeting of Congress,” passed on the third day of March last, be, and the same is hereby repealed.
Approved, July 1, 1797.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/5th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 15

Chap. ⅩⅤ.—An Act laying an additional Duty on Salt imported into the United States, and for other purposes.
Eight cents additional duty on salt imported in vessels of the U. States. Eight cents and ten per cent, thereon, laid upon other vessels.Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the thirtieth day of September next, there shall be levied, collected and paid upon all salt imported into the United States, in ships or vessels of the United States, in addition to the duty of twelve cents now payable by law, eight cents per bushel, and on all salt which, after the said thirtieth day of September, shall be imported into the United States, in ships or vessels not of the United States, the like additional duty of eight cents, and ten per centum thereon.
Drawbacks and allowances to apply to the additional duty.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That all drawbacks and allowances now authorized by law, in relation to the existing duty on salt imported into the United States, shall apply to the additional duty laid by this act, and that in addition thereto, there shall be allowed and paid upon provisions salted within the United States, except upon dried fish, upon the exportation thereof to any foreign port or place as follows, viz: on pickled fish at the rate of twelve cents per barrel, and on other provisions Additional drawbacks and allowances. at the rate of ten cents per barrel; and from and after the first day of January next there shall be an addition of thirty-three and a third per centum to the allowances now respectively granted to ships or vessels employed in the bank or other cod fisheries, and in the terms provided ​by an act entitled “An act concerning certain fisheries of the United States and for the regulation and government of the fishermen employed therein,” and during the continuance of the said act.
Mode of executing this act. Ante, p. 145.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That the act entitled “An act to provide more effectually for the collection of the duties imposed by law on goods, wares and merchandise imported into the United States, and on the tonnage of ships or vessels,” shall extend to and be in full force for the collection of the additional duty laid by this act, and generally for the execution thereof, as fully and effectually, as if every regulation, restriction, penalty, provision, clause, matter and thing therein contained had been herein inserted and re-enacted.
Limitation. Repealed March 3, 1807.Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That this act shall continue in force for two years, and from thence unto the end of the next session of Congress, and no longer.
Approved, July 8, 1797.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/5th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 16

Chap. ⅩⅥ.—An Act authorizing a Loan of Money.
New loan of $800,000.Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be, and he is hereby empowered to borrow on the credit of the United States, a sum not exceeding eight hundred thousand dollars, at an interest not exceeding six per centum per annum, reimburseable at the pleasure of the United States, or at such period as may be stipulated by contract not exceeding five years from the time of obtaining the loan, to be applied to such public purposes as are or may be authorized by law,How to be paid. and to be repaid out of the revenues accruing to the end of the present year and such further revenues as have been, or may be provided during the present session of Congress; and it shall be lawful for the Bank of the United States to lend the said sum.
In case of deficiency faith of the United States pledged to make provision for it.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That in case the existing revenues of the United States, together with such further revenues as have been, or may be provided, during the present session, shall be insufficient to discharge and reimburse the said loan, the faith of the United States is hereby pledged to make such further provision therefor, as may be necessary.
Approved, July 8, 1797.
# United States v. Williams (341 U.S. 58)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
341 U.S. 58
United States v. Williams (341 U.S. 58)
Argued: Jan. 8, 1951. --- Decided: April 23, 1951
Mr. Philip Elman, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Messrs. Ernest E. Roberts, John D. Marsh, Miami, Fla., for appellees.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Williams (341 U.S. 70)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Black

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
341 U.S. 70
United States v. Williams (341 U.S. 70)
Argued: Jan. 8, 1951. --- Decided: April 23, 1951
Mr. Philip Elman, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. John D. Marsh, Miami, Fla., for respondent Charles R. Ford.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER announced the judgment of the Court and an opinion in which THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Mr. Justice JACKSON and Mr. Justice MINTON joined.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Williams (278 U.S. 255)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
278 U.S. 255
United States v. Williams (278 U.S. 255)
Argued: and Submitted Dec. 7, 1928. --- Decided: Jan 2, 1929
The Attorney General and Mr. Wm. D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
Mr. Wm. Kaufman, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Williams (302 U.S. 46)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 46
United States v. Williams (302 U.S. 46)
Argued: Oct. 15, 1937. --- Decided: Nov 8, 1937
Mr. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Mr. Juluis C. Martin, of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
Messrs. Frank C. Wade and Perry Smith, both of Terre Haute, Ind., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Williams (188 U.S. 485)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinions

    Fuller
    Harlan
    White
United States Supreme Court
188 U.S. 485
UNITED STATES v. CHARLES A. WILLIAMS et al.
No. 59. Argued: October 30, 31, 1902. --- Decided: January 26, 1903.
Ordered for reargument December 22, 1902. Reargued January 9, 1903.
Mr. Robert A. Howard, and Solicitor General Richards for United states.
Messrs. Julian Mitchell, Jr., Henry A. M. Smith, and Julian Mitchell for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Williams (188 U.S. 485)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Fuller Harlan White
United States Supreme Court
188 U.S. 485
UNITED STATES, v. CHARLES A. WILLIAMS et al.
No. 59. Argued: October 30, 31, 1902. --- Decided: January 26, 1903.
Ordered for reargument December 22, 1902. Reargued January 9, 1903.
This case is in all substantial respects similar to the one just decided [United States v. Lynah, 187 U.S. -, ante, 349, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 349], and for the reasons given in the opinion therein the judgment is affirmed.
For the reason stated in their dissenting opinion in the prior case, the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent also in this case.
Mr. Justice McKenna took no part in the decision of these cases.

## Notes

* ↑ 188 U.S. 445
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company (343 U.S. 236)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
343 U.S. 236
United States v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company (343 U.S. 236)
Argued: and Submitted March 7, 1952. --- Decided: April 21, 1952
Mr. James L. Morrisson, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Leonard J. Matteson, New York City, for respondents Farr Sugar Corp. et al.
Messrs. Cletus Keating, Edwin S. Murphy, Louis Gusmano, all of New York City, for respondent Belgian Overseas Transport S.A. etc.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Atlantic Refining Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, news, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
360 U.S. 19
United States v. Atlantic Refining Company
Argued: April 22, 1959. --- Decided: June 8, 1959
Mr. Robert A. Bicks, Washington, D.C., for the appellant.
Messrs. David W. Peck, New York City, and David T. Searls, Houston, Tex., for the appellees.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company (298 U.S. 483)
* United States v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company (343 U.S. 236)