OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Grimm Tales Made Gay/How a Princess Was Wooed from Habitual Sadness

In days of old the King of Saxe  Had singular opinions, For with a weighty battle-axe  He brutalized his minions, And, when he’d nothing to employ  His mind, he chose a village, And with an air of savage joy  Delivered it to pillage.
But what aroused within his breast  A rage well-nigh primeval Was, most of all, his daughter, dressed  In fashion medieval The gowns that pleased this maiden’s eye  Were simple as Utopia, And for a hat she had a high  Inverted cornucopia.
In all her life she’d never smiled,  Her sadness was abysmal The boisterous monarch found his child  Unutterably dismal. He therefore said the prince who made  Her laughter from its shell come, Besides in ducats being paid,  Might wed the girl, and welcome!
I ought to say, ere I forget,  She was uncommon comely— (Who ever read a Grimm tale yet,  In which the girl was homely?) And so the King’s announcement drew  Nine princes in a column. But all in vain. The princess grew,  If anything, more solemn.
One read her “Innocents Abroad,”  The next wore clothes eccentric, The third one swallowed half his sword,  As in the circus-tent trick. Thus eight of them into her cool  Reserve but deeper shoved her: There was but one authentic fool—  The prince who really loved her!
He’d alternate between the height  Of hope and deep abasement, He caught distressing colds at night,  By watching ’neath her casement: He did what I have done, I know,  And you, I do not doubt it, — Instead of bottling up his woe,  He bored his friends about it!
In brooding on the ways of Fate  Long hours he daily wasted, His food remained upon his plate,  ’T was scarcely touched or tasted: He said the bitter things of love,  All lovers, save a few, say, And learned by heart the verses of  Swinburne, and A. de Musset!
This attitude his wished-for bride  To silent laughter goaded, Until he talked of suicide,  And then the girl exploded! “You make me laugh, and so,” she said,  “I’ll marry you next season.” (Not half the people who are wed  Have half so good a reason!)
 The Moral: The deliberate clown  Can never beat love’s barriers down:  ’T is better to be like the owl,  Comic because so grave a fowl  From him we well may take our cue—  By him be taught, to wit, to woo!
# His Job

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "His Job."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "His Job" (1917, "I didn't raise my boy to be a soldier—"), a poem by Amelia Josephine Burr
* "His Job" (1916), an essay by Thomas Arkle Clark

## See also

* Job
# His Last Bow

* related portals: Mystery.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Layout 2
HIS LAST BOW: A REMINISCENCE OF SHERLOCK HOLMES
By ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE
HIS LAST BOW A HISTORY OF THE GREAT WAR THE VALLEY OF FEAR THE POISON BELT THE LOST WORLD THE CASE OF OSCAR SLATER THE GERMAN WAR
NEW YORK
GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY
HIS LAST BOW A REMINISCENCE OF SHERLOCK HOLMES
BY ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE
AUTHOR OF “THE ADVENTURES OF SHERLOCK HOLMES,” “THE BOER WAR,” ETC.
NEW YORK GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY
COPYRIGHT, 1917, BY GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY
PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PREFACE
THE friends of Mr. Sherlock Holmes will be glad to learn that he is still alive and well, though somewhat crippled by occasional attacks of rheumatism. He has, for many years, lived in a small farm upon the Downs five miles from Eastbourne, where his time is divided between philosophy and agriculture. During this period of rest he has refused the most princely offers to take up various cases, having determined that his retirement was a permanent one. The approach of the German war caused him, however, to lay his remarkable combination of intellectual and practical activity at the disposal of the Government, with historical results which are recounted in His Last Bow. Several previous experiences which have lain long in my portfolio have been added to His Last Bow so as to complete the volume.
John H. Watson, M.D.
CONTENTS
| chapter | chapter | page |
| I | The Adventure of Wisteria Lodge | 11 |
| II | The Adventure of the Cardboard Box | 62 |
| III | The Adventure of the Red Circle | 98 |
| IV | The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans | 130 |
| V | The Adventure of the Dying Detective | 179 |
| VI | The Disappearance of Lady Frances Carfax | 205 |
| VII | The Adventure of the Devil’s Foot | 239 |
| VIII | His Last Bow | 282 |
HIS LAST BOW
By ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE
Author of “The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes,’’ etc.
HIS LAST BOW
Some Later Reminiscences of Sherlock Holmes
THESE “later reminiscences” abound in grotesque situations and complications—in adventures characteristic of Sherlock Holmes—in mysteries and intricate problems neatly solved by the matchless and master detective of fiction as well as of the real world—
Conan Doyle’s analytical powers have never been more adequately demonstrated—never has his skill in deduction had more fascinating settings than in these reminiscences.
GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY, Publishers, NEW YORK
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1930, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 93 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Homer's Battle of the Frogs and Mice/Zoilus's Remarks

ZOILUS'$^s$
REMARKS.
must do my Reader the Justice, before I enter upon these Notes of Zoilus, to inform him, that I have not in any Author met this Work ascrib'd to him by its Title, which has made me not mention it in the Life. But thus much in general appears, that he wrote several Things besides his Censure on the Iliad, which, as it gives Ground for this Opinion, encourages me to offer an Account of the Treatise.
​Being acquainted with a grave Gentleman who searches after Editions, purchases Manuscripts, and collects Copies, I apply'd to him for some Editions of this Poem, which he readily oblig'd me with. But, added he, taking down a Paper, I doubt I shall discourage you from your Translation, when I show this Work, which is written upon the Original, by Zoilus, the famous Adversary of Homer. Zoilus! said I with Surprize, I thought his Works had long since perish'd. They have so, answer'd he, all, except this little Piece, which has a Preface annex'd to it accounting for its Preservation. It seems, when he parted from Macedon, he left this behind him where he lodg'd, and where no one enter'd for a long Time, in Detestation of the Odiousness of his Character, 'till Mævius arriving there in his Travels, and being desirous to lie in the same Room, luckily found it, and brought it away with him. This the Author of the Preface imagins the Reason of Horace's wishing Mævius in the 10th Epode, such a Shipwrack as Homer describes; as it were with an Eye to his having done something disadvantageous to that Poet. From Mævius, the Piece came into the Hand of Carbilius Pictor, (who, when he wrote against Virgil, call'd his Book, with a respectful Imitation of Zoilus, the Æneidomastix) and from him into the Hands of others who are unknown, because the World apply'd to them no other Name than that of Zoilus, in Order to sink their own in ​Oblivion. Thus it ever found some learned Philologist or Critick, to keep it secret from the Rage of Homer's Admirers; yet not so secret, but that it has still been communicated among the Literati. I am of Opinion, that our Great Scaliger borrow'd it, to work him up when he writ so sharply against Cardan; and perhaps Le Clerc too, when he prov'd Q. Curtius ignorant of every particular Branch of Learning.
This formal Account made me give Attention to what the Book contain'd; and I must acknowledge, that whether it be his, or the Work of some Grammarian, it appears to be writ in his Spirit. The open Profession of Enmity to great Genius's, and the Fear of nothing so much as that he may not be able to find Faults enough, are such Resemblances of his strongest Features, that any one might take it for his own Production. To give the World a Notion of this, I have made a Collection of some Remarks, which most struck me, during that short Time in which I was allow'd to peruse the Manuscript.
# Homer: The Odyssey

* related portals: Greek language and literature.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
HOMER
THE ODYSSEY
BY THE
REV. W. LUCAS COLLINS, M.A.
AUTHOR OF 'ETONIANA,' 'THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS,' ETC.
WILLIAM BLACKWOOD AND SONS EDINBURGH AND LONDON MDCCCLXX
CONTENTS.
​It has been thought desirable in these pages to use the Latin names of the Homeric deities and heroes, as more familiar to English ears. As, however, most modern translators have followed Homer's Greek nomenclature, it may be convenient here to give both.
| Zeus | $=$ | Jupiter. |
| Herè | $=$ | Juno. |
| Arēs | $=$ | Mars. |
| Poseidōn | $=$ | Neptune. |
| Pallas Athenè | $=$ | Minerva. |
| Aphroditè | $=$ | Venus. |
| Hephaistos | $=$ | Vulcan. |
| Hermes | $=$ | Mercury. |
| Artemis | $=$ | Diana. |
| Odysseus | $=$ | Ulysses. |
| Aias | $=$ | Ajax. |
The passages quoted, unless otherwise specified, are from the admirable translation of Mr Worsley.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Homer's Battle of the Frogs and Mice (Parnell)

* "Homer's Battle of the Frogs and Mice", in Homer's Battle of the Frogs and Mice. With the Remarks of Zoilus. To which is prefix'd the Life of the said Zoilus (1717)
* Homer's Batrachomuomachia; or, The Battle of the Frogs and Mice, in The Poetical Works of Thomas Parnell (1833)
# Guffey v. Smith (237 U.S. 120)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
237 U.S. 120
Guffey v. Smith (237 U.S. 120)
Argued: December 2 and 3, 1914. ---
Messrs. Joseph W. Bailey, J. H. Beal, and Robert J. Dodds for petitioners.
Mr. Jay A. Hindman for respondents.
Mr. Justice Van Devanter delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Guey Heung Lee v. Johnson

Supreme Court of the United States
404 U.S. 1215
Guey Heung Lee et al. v. Johnson et al.
On Application For Stay Pending Appeal
No. A-203. Argued: N/A --- Decided: August 25, 1971
Application for stay of District Court's order reassigning pupils of Chinese ancestry to other San Francisco public schools to correct past patterns of de jure racial segregation is denied as school desegregation plan offered by school board and approved by District Court seems well within established legal bounds.
See: 339 F. Supp. 1315.
# Guffey v. Smith (237 U.S. 101)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
237 U.S. 101
Guffey v. Smith
Argued: December 2 and 3, 1914. --- Decided: April 5, 1915
Messrs. Joseph W. Bailey, J. H. Beal, and Robert J. Dodds for petitioners.
Mr. Jay A. Hindman for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 102-107 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Van Devanter delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Guffey v. Smith (237 U.S. 120)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
237 U.S. 120
Guffey v. Smith (237 U.S. 120)
Argued: December 2 and 3, 1914. ---
This case is, in all material respects, like that of Guffey v. Smith, just decided [[[237 U.S. 101]], 59 L. ed. --, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 526]. The two cases were argued together, and the views expressed in that are decisive of this.
The decrees below are reversed, and the case is remanded to the District Court, with like directions as in that case.
Decree reversed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Guests at Yule

"Noël! Noël!"
* Edmund Clarence Stedman (1897), "Guests at Yule" in Poems, now first collected.
* Edmund Clarence Stedman (1908), "Guests at Yule" in The poems of Edmund Clarence Stedman.
# Guffey v. Smith

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Guffey v. Smith."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Guffey v. Smith (237 U.S. 101)
* Guffey v. Smith (237 U.S. 120)
# Guggenheim v. Rasquin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
312 U.S. 254
Guggenheim v. Rasquin
Argued: Jan. 6, 7, 1941. --- Decided: Feb 3, 1941
Messrs. John G. Jackson, Jr., and Paul B. Barringer, Jr., both of New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. J. Louis Monarch, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hecht v. Malley Howard

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 144
Hecht v. Malley Howard
Argued: May 3, 1924. --- Decided: May 12, 1924
Mr. Edward F. McClennen, of Boston, Mass., for petitioners Hecht, Howard, and others.
Messrs. Harrison M. Davis and Felix Rackemann, both of Boston, Mass., for petitioners Crocker and others.
The Attorney General and Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, of New York City, for respondents.
Mr. Justice SANFORD delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hecht v. Boughton

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
105 U.S. 235
Hecht v. Boughton
MOTION to dismiss a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Wyoming.
Mr. Thomas Turner in support of the motion.
Mr. E. W. Mann, contra.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hecker v. Fowler

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
66 U.S. 95
Hecker v. Fowler
This was covenant brought in the Circuit Court for the southern district of New York. While the cause was pending there, it was referred by consent. The referee found for the plaintiff. The court entered judgment on the award, and the defendant below took this writ of error. The defendant in error (plaintiff below) moved to dismiss the writ of error, and affirm the judgment.
Mr. Andrews, of New York, in support of the motion. The iacts are not found in a general or special verdict, nor agreed on in a case stated, and there is no bill of exceptions. This court must, therefore, affirm the judgment, unless there is error apparent on the face of the record. Graham vs. Bayne, (18 How., 60;) Guild vs. Frontin, (18 How., 135;) Suydam vs. Williamson, (20 How., 427;) Kelsey vs. Forsyth, (21 How., 85;) Campbell vs. Boyreace, (21 How., 223.) There is no error on the fact of this record.
Mr. Monroe, of New York, resisted the motion.
Mr. Chief Justice TANEY.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Heck v. Humphrey/Concurrence Thomas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Thomas Souter
* Wikipedia article
Justice Thomas, concurring.
The Court and Justice Souter correctly begin their analyses with the realization that "[t]his case lies at the intersection of . . . the Civil Rights Act of 1871, Rev. Stat. § 1979, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the federal habeas corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2254." Ante, at 480; post, at 491. One need only read the respective opinions in this case to understand [p491] the difficulty of the task before the Court today. Both the Court and Justice Souter embark on a similar enterprise—harmonizing "[t]he broad language of § 1983," a "general" statute, with "the specific federal habeas corpus statute." Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 489 (1973).
I write separately to note that it is we who have put § 1983 and the habeas statute on what Justice Souter appropriately terms a "collision course." Post, at 492. It has long been recognized that we have expanded the prerogative writ of habeas corpus and § 1983 far beyond the limited scope either was originally intended to have. Cf., e.g., Wright v. West, 505 U.S. 277, 285–286 (1992) (opinion of Thomas, J.) (habeas); Golden State Transit Corp. v. Los Angeles, 493 U.S. 103, 117 (1989) (Kennedy, J., dissenting) (§ 1983). Expanding the two historic statutes brought them squarely into conflict in the context of suits by state prisoners, as we made clear in Preiser.
Given that the Court created the tension between the two statutes, it is proper for the Court to devise limitations aimed at ameliorating the conflict, provided that it does so in a principled fashion. Cf. Malley v. Briggs, 475 U.S. 335, 342 (1986). Because the Court today limits the scope of § 1983 in a manner consistent both with the federalism concerns undergirding the explicit exhaustion requirement of the habeas statute, ante, at 483, and with the state of the common law at the time § 1983 was enacted, ante, at 484–486, and n. 4, I join the Court's opinion.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hurrah for Dixie!

The poem is uncredited here, but is evidently a variant of Albert Pike’s version of “Dixie.”
Hurrah for Dixie!
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hurrah for the Bonnets of Blue (Glasgow, 1829)

HURRAH FOR THE BONNETS OF BLUE.
PRAY GOODY DONALD OF DUNDEE. THE CYPRESS WREATH.
I'D BE A BUTTERFLY
OH SAY NOT WOMEN’S LOVE IS BOUGHT.
HE'S O’ER THE HILLS THAT I LO'E WEEL.
THE CAPTIVE MANIAC.
GLASGOW: Printed for the Booksellers.
1829.
* Hurrah for the Bonnets of Blue
* Pray Goody
* Donald of Dundee
* The Cypress Wreath
* I'd be a Butterfly
* Oh Say Not Woman's Love is Bought
* He's O'er the Hills that I Lo'e Weel
* The Captive Maniac
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hurrah for the Bonnets of Blue (Glasgow, 1829)/Donald of Dundee

Although not credited, this work is by David Vedder
DONALD OF DUNDEE.
# Hurrah! Hurrah! For Cleve and Steve

Hurrah! hurrah! for Cleve and Steve, Ring out the party cry, The Democratic flag unfurl, And proudly let it fly.
Our ranks are sometimes broken, But divide them as you will, The party of the people, Will live and flourish still.
Hurrah! hurrah! for Cleve and Steve, Ring out the party cry, The Democratic flag unfurl, And proudly let it fly.
See sturdy grand old Illinois Reporting at the front, And hand in hand with New York State, She bears the battle's brunt
Our path will lead to vict'ry, To purity and truth Three cheers for Cleve and Steve For Mistress Frank and Ruth.
Hurrah! hurrah! for Cleve and Steve, Ring out the party cry, The Democratic flag unfurl, And proudly let it fly.
Tho' clouds of agitation rise, Fear not the coming storm, But boldly strike for Cleve and Steve, For blue skies and reform
The sun of a new era, beams brightly o'er the land, And we'll stand for aye united, The Democratic Band.
Hurrah! hurrah! for Cleve and Steve, Ring out the party cry, The Democratic flag unfurl, And proudly let it fly.
# Hurrah for Jeff. Davis

Hurrah for Jeff. Davis. By a Lady Rebel—written after the battle of Bull Run.
——:0:——
Air—“Hurrah for the Bonnets o’ Blue.”
——:0:——
Hurrah for Jeff. Davis, Hurrah! And hurrah for brave Beauregard, too; Hurrah for the legion, the brave Southern men, And down with the scared Yankee crew.
We’ve whipped them some five or six times— They’ve thrown down their muskets and guns; The teamsters ahead, the Bug-a-boos saw, And away ran the brave mother’s sons!
Chorus—Hurrah for Jeff. Davis, &c.
Gen. Patterson’s the General for me, He knows when to beat a retreat And get out of all danger, for fear that himself Or his horse, in the race, should be beat.
Chorus—Hurrah for Jeff. Davis, &c.
Never mind now about the knapsacks— Pitch swords and canteens on the ground; “Right about face,” and then “Double Quick” step To Washington! on with a bound.
Hurrah for Jeff. Davis, Hurrah! And hurrah for brave Beauregard, too; Hurrah for the legion, the brave Southern men, Three groans for the scared Yankee crew!
This work was published before January 1, 1929 and is anonymous or pseudonymous due to unknown authorship. It is in the public domain in the United States as well as countries and areas where the copyright terms of anonymous or pseudonymous works are 95 years or less since publication.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Huron Portland Cement Company v. City of Detroit Michigan

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
362 U.S. 440
Huron Portland Cement Company v. City of Detroit Michigan
Argued: Feb. 29, 1960. --- Decided: April 25, 1960
Mr. Alfred E. Lindbloom, Detroit, Mich., for appellant.
Mr. John F. Hathaway, Detroit, Mich., for appellees.
Mr. Justice STEWART delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hurrah for the Bonnets of Blue (Glasgow, 1829)/He's O'er the Hills that I Lo'e Weel

Although not credited, this poem is by Carolina Nairne (see Life and Songs of the Baroness Nairne: with a Memoir and Poems of Caroline Oliphant the younger (1869), edited by the Charles Rogers)
HE’S OWRE THE HILLS THAT I LO'E WEEL. Tune—He's owre the hills.
# Hockey: Canada's Royal Winter Game/The Queen's College Hockey Club of Kingston

QUEEN'S COLLEGE, KINGSTON, 1899.
THE QUEENS COLLEGE HOCKEY TEAM, KINGSTON.
WAS organized in 1887, and was one of the prime movers in the formation of the Ontario Union. The Kingston players are Inter-collegiate Champions of America and winners of the O. H. A. Senior Championship. Their Record in the O. H. A. is better than that of any other team in the league. Since 1891 they have been first four times, and in the finals, seven. They have twice played for the Stanley Cup—in 1895, against the Montrealers; and in 1899, against the Shamrocks.