OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Howard v. Fleming

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
191 U.S. 126
Howard v. Fleming
Argued: October 27, 1903. --- Decided: November 16, 1903
At the June term, 1901, of the superior court of Guilford county, North Carolina, the three parties named as appellants in the first of these cases and as plaintiffs in error in the second were indicted, tried, and convicted of the crime of conspiracy. Daly was sentenced to the penitentiary for seven years, and the other two for ten years each. All appealed to the supreme court of the state, by which court the judgment was affirmed (129 N. C. 584, 40 S. E. 71), and thereupon the writ of error in the last case was issued. A writ of habeas corpus was also sued out from the circuit court of the United States for the eastern district of North Carolina, directed to the warden of the state prison, which, after hearing, was dismissed, and from such dismissal an appeal was taken to this court; and that is the first of the above cases.
Messrs. Frank P. Blair, Leslie A. Gilmore, J. L. Howard, and H. D. Hawley for Howard et al.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Howard v. Illinois Central Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
207 U.S. 463
Howard v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
Argued: April 10, 11, 1907. --- Decided: January 6, 1908
Mr. William R. Harr for plaintiff in error in No. 216.
Messrs. Jesse E. Torrance, S.C.. Bloss, George
[Argument of Counsel from page 464 intentionally omitted]
Durelle, and W. M. Smith for plaintiff in error in No. 222.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 465-479 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. J. M. Dickinson, Blewett Lee, and Charles N. Burch for defendants in error in No. 216.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 479-486 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Alexander Pope Humphrey, R. S. Lovett, and Maxwell Evarts for defendant fendant in error in No. 222.
Attorney General Bonaparte and Mr. William R. Harr for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 486-489 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Inside of King's College Chapel, Cambridge

TAX not the royal Saint with vain expense, With ill-matched aims the Architect who planned-- Albeit labouring for a scanty band Of white robed Scholars only--this immense And glorious Work of fine intelligence! Give all thou canst; high Heaven rejects the lore Of nicely-calculated less or more; So deemed the man who fashioned for the sense These lofty pillars, spread that branching roof Self-poised, and scooped into ten thousand cells, Where light and shade repose, where music dwells Lingering--and wandering on as loth to die; Like thoughts whose very sweetness yieldeth proof That they were born for immortality.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Inside the Lines (Biggers and Ritchie)

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Commons category.
The novel was adapted from the play of the same name by Earl Derr Biggers. In turn adapted into a black-and-white silent film in 1918 and remade in colour in 1930. (Details of the 1930 film and a link to watch it are at Wikipedia)
Layout 2
page
INSIDE THE LINES
page
"You must accept my word."
INSIDE THE LINES
By
EARL DERR RIGGERS
AND
ROBERT WELLES RITCHIE
Founded on Earl Derr Biggers'
Play of the Same Name
INDIANAPOLIS
THE BOBBS-MERRILL COMPANY
PUBLISHERS
Copyright 1915
The Bobbs-Merill Company
PRESS OF
BRAUMSWORTH & CO,
BOOKBINDERS AND PRINTERS BROOKLYN, YH. Y.
page
CONTENTS
CHAPTER PAGE
page
INSIDE THE LINES
page
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1942, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 81 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# International review of criminal policy - Nos. 43 and 44/PROCEDURAL LAW/International harmonization

indexes: International review of criminal policy - Nos. 43 and 44

## E. International harmonization

176. In procedural law, international action has already commenced in all of the areas described above and has been concerned with (a) the field of coercive powers; (b) the legality of processing personal data in the course of criminal proceedings; and (c) the admissibility of computer-generated evidence in court proceedings.

## 1. Coercive powers in the field of information technology

177. One example of international harmonization of the above-mentioned coercive powers in information technology derives primarily from the guarantees of article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The European Court of Human Rights applied these guarantees especially in the area of wire-tapping. In the Klass case,the Court confirmed the legality of the German law on limitations of the secrecy of letters, post and telecommunication, which, under specific conditions, provides the authorities with the competence to supervise
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# International review of criminal policy - Nos. 43 and 44/PROCEDURAL LAW/Background

indexes: International review of criminal policy - Nos. 43 and 44
146. Computer-specific procedural law problems arise not only in the prosecution of computer-crime cases but also in many other fields of criminal investigation. This is especially illustrated by the prosecution of economic crimes , predominantly in the field of banking, where most of the relevant evidence is stored in automated data-processing systems. In the field of traditional crime, computer-stored evidence is already a significant issue, as is illustrated by cases of drug traffickers conducting their business using personal computers and international telecommunication systems. In future, new optical storage devices based on compact disc technology will further encourage the destruction of originals (if paper originals still exist) after the information has been recorded in automated data-processing systems. Owing to these new technical developments and to the growing use of computers in all areas of economic and social life, courts and prosecution authorities will depend to an increasing extent on evidence stored or processed by modern information technology.
147. The resulting replacement of visible and corporeal objects of proof by invisible and intangible evidence in the field of information technology not only creates practical problems but also opens up new legal issues: the coercive powers of prosecuting authorities, discussed in paragraphs 148-165; specific problems with personal data, discussed in paragraphs 166-170; and the admissibility of computer-generated evidence, discussed in paragraphs 171-175. The relevant problems are dealt with not only at the national level but also by various international organizations, as discussed in paragraphs 176-185.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Isserman v. Ethics Committee of Essex County Bar Association

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
345 U.S. 927
Isserman v. Ethics Committee of Essex County Bar Association
Argued: April 6, 1953. ---
Mr. Leonard B. Boudin, for petitioner.
Mr. Frederick C. Vonhof, for respondent.
Mr. Justice CLARK took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Mr. Justice BLACK, with whom Mr. Justice DOUGLAS agrees.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Isserman v. Ethics Committee of Essex County Bar Association/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
345 U.S. 927
Isserman v. Ethics Committee of Essex County Bar Association
Argued: April 6, 1953. ---
I would grant this certiorari. It involves an order of the New Jersey Supreme Court permanently disbarring petitioner from the practice of law in that state. The Court's order rests on petitioner's conviction of contempt in a federal district court, affirmed by this Court in Sacher v. United States, 343 U.S. 1, 72 S.Ct. 451, 96 L.Ed. 717. The record of the New Jersey proceedings before us leaves me with the belief that the state failed to afford petitioner the kind of a hearing required by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Although petitioner was allowed to appear before a local bar committee and to present a formal answer and make oral argument before the State Supreme Court, the full record persuades me that he was denied an adequate opportunity to confront witnesses against him and to offer evidence in his behalf. Instead of hearing evidence and making its own findings the state court's order was based on findings made by a federal district judge who had summarily convicted petitioner of contempt without a hearing. I believe that a lawyer is denied due process when he is expelled from his profession without ever having been afforded an opportunity to confront his accusers and present evidence to deny, explain or extenuate the charges against him. See Ex parte Robinson, 19 Wall. 505, 512-513, 22 L.Ed. 205, and In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 68 S.Ct 499, 92 L.Ed. 682.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Israfel (Coates)

"A dreamer midst the stars doth dwell"
* "Israphel" from The Cosmopolitan (Sept 1894).
* "Israphel" from Poems (1898)
* "Israfel" from Poems Vol. I (1916)
# Israfel

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Israfel."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Israfel, a poem by Florence Earle Coates (A dreamer midst the stars doth dwell,)
* Israfel, a poem by Edgar Allan Poe (In Heaven a spirit doth dwell)

## Notes

* ↑ This poem references Poe's poem; also published with the spelling, "Israphel"
# I had a horse (1820)/Cauld kail in Aberdeen

CAULD KAIL IN ABERDEEN.
There's cauld kail in Aberdeen, And castocks in Strabogie, Where ilka lad maun hae his lass, But I maun hae my cogie, But I maun hae my cogie, troth, I canna want my cogie, ​I wadna gie my three gird cog For a' the wives in Bogie.
Johnny Smith has got a wife Wha scrimps him o' his cogie; But where she mine upon my life, I'd duck her in a bogie. For I maun hae my cogie, troth, I canna want my cogie, I wadna gie my three gird cog For a' the wives in Bogie.
Twa or three todlin weans they hae, The pride o' a' Strabogie, Whene'er the totums cry for meat, She cusses ay his cogie; Crying, "Wae betide the three gird cog "Oh, wae betide the cogie, "It does mair skaith than a' the ills "That happen in Strabogie.
Sho fand him ance at Willie Sharp's; And, what they maist did laugh at, She brake the bicker, spilt the drink, And tightly gowff'd his hafset, Crying, "Wae betide the three gird cog "Oh wae betide the cogie! "It does mair skaith than a' the ills "that happen in Strabogie.
Yet here's to ilka honest soul, Wha'll drink wi' me a cogie; And for each silly whingin fool, We'll duck him in a bogie. ​For I maun hae my cogie, Sirs, I canna want my cogie: I wadna gie my three gird cog
For a' the queens in Bogie.
# I had a guinea golden—
### Version 1

I had a guinea golden - I lost it in the sand - And tho' the sum was simple And pounds were in the land - Still, had it such a value Unto my frugal eye - That when I could not find it- I sat me down to sigh.
I had a crimson Robin - Who sang full many a day But when the woods were painted - He - too - did fly away - Time brought me other Robins - Their ballads were the same - Still, for my missing Troubadour I kept the "house at hame".
I had a star in heaven - One "Pleiad" was it's name - And when I was not heeding, It wandered from the same - And tho' the skies are crowded - And all the night ashine - I do not care about it - Since none of them are mine -
My story has a moral - I have a missing friend - "Pleiad" it's name - and Robin - And guinea in the sand - And when this mournful ditty Accompanied with tear - Shall meet the eye of traitor In country far from here - Grant that repentance solemn May seize opon his mind - And he no consolation Beneath the sun may find.

### Version 2

I had a guinea golden — I lost it in the sand — And tho' the sum was simple And pounds were in the land — Still, had it such a value Unto my frugal eye — That when I could not find it — I sat me down to sigh.
I had a crimson Robin — Who sang full many a day But when the woods were painted, He, too, did fly away —
Time brought me other Robins — Their ballads were the same — Still, for my missing Troubador I kept the "house at hame."
I had a star in heaven — One "Pleiad" was its name — And when I was not heeding, It wandered from the same. And tho' the skies are crowded — And all the night ashine — I do not care about it — Since none of them are mine.
My story has a moral — I have a missing friend — "Pleiad" its name, and Robin, And guinea in the sand. And when this mournful ditty Accompanied with tear — Shall meet the eye of traitor In country far from here — Grant that repentance solemn May seize upon his mind — And he no consolation Beneath the sun may find.
# Illinois Centural v. People of the State of Illinois/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
108 U.S. 541
Illinois Centural v. People of the State of Illinois
This case, like that of Ruggles v. Illinois, just [ante, 832,] presents the question whether the state of Illinois has entered into a contract with a railroad corporation not to exercise the legislative power to regulate charges for the carriage of persons and property upon the railroad of the corporation. It is not necessary in this case, any more than it was in the other, to inquire whether the power of legislative regulation, in this particular, is one that can be bargained away, because here, as there, we are of opinion that no such thing was intended. The provision of the charter of the Illinois Central Railroad Company relied on, as showing a contract, is almost identical with that of the Central Military Tract Company considered in the Ruggles Case, and in the following words:
'Sec. 8. The said company shall have power to make, ordain, and establish all such by-laws, rules, and regulations as may be deemed expedient and necessary to fulfill the purposes and carry into effect the provisions of this act, and for the well-ordering, regulating, and securing the affairs, business, and interests of the company: provided, that the same be not repugnant to the constitution and laws of the United States or of this state, or repugnant to this act. The board of directors shall have power to establish such rates of toll for the conveyance of persons and property upon the same as they shall from time to time by their by-laws direct and determine, and to levy and collect the same for the use of said company. The transportation of persons and property, the width of track, the construction of wheels, the form and size of cars, the weight of loads, and all other matters and things respecting the use of said road and the conveyance of passengers and property, shall be in conformity to such rules and regulations as said board of directors shall from time to time determine. Nothing in this act contained shall authorize said corporation to make a location of their track within any city without the consent of common council of said city.' What was said in the other case as to the construction of section 6 of that charter is applicable to this, and, referring to the opinion in that case for the reasons, we affirm this judgment.
BLATCHFORD, J., took no part in the decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Illinois Commerce Commission v. Thomson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
318 U.S. 675
Illinois Commerce Commission v. Thomson
Argued: Jan. 12, 1943. --- Decided: April 12, 1943
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
Mr. William C. Wines, of Chicago, Ill., for appellants.
Mr. Ney F. Morehouse, of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
Mr. Chief Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Illinois Commerce Commission v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
292 U.S. 474
Illinois Commerce Commission v. United States
Argued: April 30 to May 1, 1934. --- Decided: May 28, 1934
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
[Syllabus from pages 474-476 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Luther M. Walter, of Chicago, Ill., for appellants Acme Steel Co. and others.
Mr. Herbert J. Campbell, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant Board of Trade of City of Chicago.
The Attorney General and Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton, of Washington, D.C., for appellees the United States and Interstate Commerce Commission.
Mr. J. N. Davis, of Chicago, Ill., for appellees Alton R. Co. and others.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Illinois Centural Company v. Turrill

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
110 U.S. 301
Illinois Centural Company v. Turrill
Geo. Payson, for railroad companies.
Chauncey Smith and L. L. Bond, for administratrix.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Illinois Centural v. People of the State of Illinois

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
108 U.S. 541
Illinois Centural v. People of the State of Illinois
John N. Jewett and John A. Campbell, for plaintiff in error.
J. K. Edsall and Jas. McCartney, for defendant in error.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jan the Icelander
### Contents

* Chapter 1
* Chapter 2
* Chapter 3
* Chapter 4
* Chapter 5
* Chapter 6
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1931, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 92 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 Enforcement Order

Layout 2
​रजिस्ट्री सं० डी०एल०-33004/99 REGD. NO. D. L.-33004/99
भारत $_{का}$ राजपत्र The Gazette of India
असाधारण EXTRAORDINARY भाग II — खण्ड 3 PART II — Section 3 प्राधिकार से प्रकाशित PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
इस भाग में भिन्न पृष्ठ संख्या दी जाती है जिससे कि यह अलग संकलन के रूप में रखा जा सके। Separate paging is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation.
MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS (Department of Jammu and Kashmir Affairs)
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 9th August, 2019
S.O. 2889(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of section 2 of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 (34 of 2019), the Central Government hereby appoints the 31st day of October, 2019, as the appointed day for the purposes of the said Act.
[F. No. 11014/05/2014-K-I] RAJIV GAUBA, Secy.
4131 GI/2019
This work is the work of Government of India. Section 52(1)(q) of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957 allows for the reproduction or publication of
* any matter which has been published in any Official Gazette except an Act of a Legislature;
* any Act of a Legislature subject to the condition that such Act is reproduced or published together with any commentary thereon or any other original matter;
* the report of any committee, commission, council, board or other like body appointed by the government if such report has been laid on the Table of the Legislature, unless the reproduction or publication of such report is prohibited by the government;
* any judgement or order of a court, Tribunal or other judicial authority, unless the reproduction or publication of such judgement or order is prohibited by the court, the Tribunal or other judicial authority, as the case may be.
The decision of the Supreme Court of India in "Eastern Book Company & Ors vs D.B. Modak & Anr" on 12 December, 2007 interpreted this section of the Act as making the material public domain.
This work is also in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse