OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Some Textual Difficulties in Shakespeare

Layout 2
SOME TEXTUAL DIFFICULTIES IN SHAKESPEARE
PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUSPICES
OF THE
ELIZABETHAN CLUB YALE UNIVERSITY
SOME TEXTUAL DIFFICULTIES IN SHAKESPEARE
BY
CHARLES D. STEWART
NEW HAVEN: YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON: HUMPHREY MILFORD OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS MDCCCCXIV
Copyright, 1914 By Yale University Press
First printed September, 1914. 1000 copies
CONTENTS
PAGE
That Runaways' Eyes May Wink Romeo and Juliet 1
Airy Air Troilus and Cressida 14
Both to My God, and to My Gracious King Hamlet 20
But that to Your Sufficiency . . . As Your Worth is Able Measure for Measure 26
The Body is with the King, but the King is not with the Body Hamlet 34
Grates Me.The Sum Antony and Cleopatra 41
I see that Men Make Ropes in Such a Scar All's Well that Ends Well 44
Armado o' the One Side Love's Labour's Lost 52
For Defect of Judgment Is Oft the Cause of Fear Cymbeline 56
Ignorance Itself is a Plummet over Me Merry Wives of Windsor 61
Greater than Great, Great, Great, Great Pompey Love's Labour's Lost 67
Some Run From Brakes of Ice and Answer None Measure for Measure 69
Qualtitie Calmie Custure Me! Henry V 71
But Here, Upon This Bank and Shoal of Time Macbeth 75
​But He That Tempered Thee Bade Thee Stand Up Henry V 79
To Say "Ay" and "No" to Everything that I Said Lear 83
They Know Your Grace hath Cause and Means and Might; So hath Your Highness Henry V 88
The Blank Prince, Sir; Alias the Prince of Darkness All's Well that Ends Well 93
Leontes' Obscure Soliloquy The Winter's Tale 96
The Clearest Gods King Lear 110
To Dance Their Ringlets to the Whistling Wind Midsummer Night's Dream 116
Move the Still-peering Air All's Well that Ends Well 119
To Pay Five Ducats, Five, I Would not Farm It Hamlet 123
Yes, For a Score of Kingdoms You Should Wrangle The Tempest 125
Cleopatra's Answer to Caesar Antony and Cleopatra 131
Lord Bardolph's Reply 2 Henry IV 135
As Those that Fear They Hope, and Know They Fear As You Like It 147
Painted Hope Titus Andronicus 155
Those Bated that Inherit but the Fall of the Last Monarchy All's Well that Ends Well 158
The Spirit of Capulet Romeo and Juliet 162
Her C's, Her U's and Her T's Twelfth Night 164
A Fixed Figure for the Time of Scorn Othello 170
​I Loved for Intermission Merchant of Venice 173
More Than Mine Own; That Am, Have, and Will Be Henry VIII 182
Thy Banks with Pioned and Twilled Brims The Tempest 192
My Brother General 2 Henry IV 195
The Mystery of Hamlet 204
Death's Heritage Romeo and Juliet 230
That Smiles His Cheek in Years Love's Labour's Lost 234
Would That Alone a Love He Would Detaine Comedy of Errors 237
Adriana's Point of View Comedy of Errors 241
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1960, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 63 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Shapiro v. Doe/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Black
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 488
Shapiro v. Doe
The motion of the appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to dismiss is also granted and the appeal is dismissed for failure to docket the case within the time prescribed by Rule 13.
Mr. Justice BLACK, with whom Mr. Justice DOUGLAS joins, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Shapiro v. Doe/Dissent Black

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Black
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 488
Shapiro v. Doe
Mr. Justice BLACK, with whom Mr. Justice DOUGLAS joins, dissenting.
In this case a three-judge United States District Court invalidated a Connecticut state welfare regulation requiring the mother of an illegitimate child to reveal the name of the child's father as a precondition to receiving welfare assistance on the ground that the regulation imposed an additional condition of welfare eligibility not required or authorized by the Social Security Act, 49 Stat. 620, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 601-610 (1964 ed. and Supp. IV), 302 F.Supp. 761. The case comes to this Court on direct appeal taken by Connecticut welfare officials pursuant to the authorization in 28 U.S.C. § 1253. There can be no doubt about the fact that this appeal presents a federal question which should be decided here and that this Court has jurisdiction over the appeal since appellee's statutory claim was initially joined with a constitutional attack upon the Connecticut regulation. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers v. Jacobsen, 362 U.S. 73, 80 S.Ct. 568, 4 L.Ed.2d 568 (1960). Yet, the Court today dismisses this appeal on the ground that it was not timely docketed in accordance with Rule 13(1) of the Rules of the United States Supreme Court. Rule 13(1) provides that in cases appealed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1253 the time limit for docketing the appeal shall be 60 days from the filing of the notice of the appeal. In this case the notice of appeal was properly filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2101(b) on September 2, 1969. The 60-day time limit thus expired on November 1, 1969, but appellants did not docket the appeal until November 3, 1969, two days later, one of which was a Sunday. It is because of this minor an essentially technical infraction of its own Rules that the Court today dismisses this important appeal. I cannot agree with such a result. Time defects such as this one involving only a failure to comply with the Rules of this Court do not rise to jurisdictional proportions and can be waived by the Court when the interests of justice so require. Taglianetti v. United States, 394 U.S. 316 n. 1, 89 S.Ct. 1099, 22 L.Ed.2d 302 (1969). Given the importance of the issue in this case and the harmless, undoubtedly inadvertent nature of appellant's error, this case seems to me an altogether appropriate one for the waiver of Rule 13(1). The Court hardly puts its best foot forward when it dismisses so substantial an appeal on so technical a ground. I would waive the time defect, note probable jurisdiction, and consider the issue presented in this appeal on the merits.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Shapiro v. Thompson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969), was a Supreme Court decision that helped to establish a fundamental "right to travel" in U.S. law. Although the Constitution does not mention the right to travel, it is implied by the other rights given in the Constitution. (Although the right was recognized under the Equal Protection clause in this case, pre-Fourteenth Amendment, the right to travel was understood as protected by the Privileges and Immunities Clause (Article IV), as a privilege of citizenship, and therefore might have been applied to the states under the Privileges or Immunities Clause of Amendment XIV, as J. Stewart wanted.) Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Concurring Opinion

    Stewart

## Dissenting Opinions

    Warren
    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
394 U.S. 618
Shapiro v. Thompson
United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
No. 9 Argued: October 23 and 24, 1968 --- Decided: April 21, 1969
[Syllabus from pages 618-620 intentionally omitted]
Francis J. MacGregor, Fairfield, Conn., Richard W. Barton, Washington, D.C., and William C. Sennett, Harrisburg, Pa., for appellants.
Archibald Cox, Washington, D.C., for appellees.
Lorna L. Williams, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Des Moines, Iowa, for State or Iowa, as amicus curiae.
[The balance of this page intentionally left blank]
Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Shapiro v. Doe

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 488
Shapiro v. Doe
See 397 U.S. 970, 90 S.Ct. 991.
Robert K. Killian, Atty. Gen. of Connecticut, and Francis J. MacGregor, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Lee A. Albert, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Silverman v. United States/Concurrence Clark

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Douglas Clark
* Wikipedia article
United States Supreme Court
365 U.S. 505
Silverman v. United States
Argued: Dec. 5, 1960. --- Decided: March 6, 1961
Mr. Justice CLARK and Mr. Justice WHITTAKER, concurring.
In view of the determination by the majority that the unauthorized physical penetration into petitioners' premises constituted sufficient trespass to remove this case from the coverage of earlier decisions, we feel obliged to join in the Court's opinion.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Silverman v. United States/Concurrence Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Douglas Clark
* Wikipedia article
United States Supreme Court
365 U.S. 505
Silverman v. United States
Argued: Dec. 5, 1960. --- Decided: March 6, 1961
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring.
My trouble with stare decisis in this field is that it leads us to a matching of cases on irrelevant facts. An electronic device on the outside wall of a house is a permissible invasion of privacy according to Goldman v. United States, 316 U.S. 129, 62 S.Ct. 993, 86 L.Ed. 1322, while an electronic device that penetrates the wall, as here, is not. Yet the invasion of privacy is as great in one case as in the other. The concept of 'an unauthorized physical penetration into the premises,' on which the present decision rests seems to me to be beside the point. Was not the wrong in both cases done when the intimacies of the home were tapped, recorded, or revealed? The depth of the penetration of the electronic device-even the degree of its remoteness from the inside of the house-is not the measure of the injury. There is in each such case a search that should be made, if at all, only on a warrant issued by a magistrate. I stated my views in On Lee v. United States, 343 U.S. 747, 72 S.Ct. 967, 96 L.Ed. 1270, and adhere to them. Our concern should not be with the trivialities of the local law of trespass, as the opinion of the Court indicates. But neither should the command of the Fourth Amendment be limited by nice distinctions turning on the kind of electronic equipment employed. Rather our sole concern should be with whether the privacy of the home was invaded. Since it was invaded here, and since no search warrant was obtained as required by the Fourth Amendment and Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A., I agree with the Court that the judgment of conviction must be set aside.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Silversheene

—Page 122
Springfield, Massachusetts
By permission of the publishers,
Barse and Hopkins.
Contents
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1954, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 69 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Strong v. Gassert/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
215 U.S. 583
Strong v. Gassert
Mr. M. S. Gunn for plaintiff in error.
Mr. W. C. Keegin for defendant in error.
Per Curiam: Writ of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U.S. 432, 53 L. ed. 269, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 146; Corkran Oil & Development Co. v. Arnaudet, 199 U.S. 182, 50 L. ed. 143, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 41; Arkansas Southern R. Co. v. German Nat. Bank, 207 U.S. 270, 52 L. ed. 201, 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 78.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Strong v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Strong v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Strong v. United States (154 U.S. 632)
* Strong v. United States (73 U.S. 788)
# Strong v. United States (154 U.S. 632)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
154 U.S. 632
Strong v. United States
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Strong v. United States (73 U.S. 788)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
73 U.S. 788
Strong v. United States
ERROR to the District Court for the Northern District of Florida.
Messrs. N. Wilson and E. M. Stanton, for the plaintiff in error; Mr. Stanbery, Attorney-General, and Mr. Ashton, special counsel for the United States, contra.
Mr. Justice CLIFFORD stated the case, and delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Strong v. Gassert

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
215 U.S. 583
Strong v. Gassert

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Songs of a Savoyard/The House of Peers

From Iolanthe.
THE HOUSE OF PEERS.
WHEN Britain really ruled the waves— (In good Queen Bess's time)
The House of Peers made no pretence
To intellectual eminence,
Or scholarship sublime;
Yet Britain won her proudest bays
In good Queen Bess's glorious days!
When Wellington thrashed Bonaparte,
As every child can tell,
The House of Peers, throughout the war,
Did nothing in particular,
And did it very well;
Yet Britain set the world a-blaze
In good King George's glorious days!
And while the House of Peers withholds
Its legislative hand,
And noble statesmen do not itch
To interfere with matters which
They do not understand,
As bright will shine Great Britain's rays,
As in King George's glorious days!
# Songs of a Savoyard/The Lovesick Boy

From Trial by Jury.
THE LOVE-SICK BOY.
WHEN first my old, old love I knew,
My bosom welled with joy;
My riches at her feet I threw;
I was a love-sick boy!
No terms seemed too extravagant
Upon her to employ—
I used to mope, and sigh, and pant,
Just like a love-sick boy!
But joy incessant palls the sense;
And love, unchanged will cloy,
And she became a bore intense
Unto her love—sick boy!
With fitful glimmer burnt my flame,
And I grew cold and coy,
At last, one morning, I became
Another's love-sick boy!
# Songs of a Savoyard/The Magnet and the Churn

From Patience.
THE MAGNET AND THE CHURN.
A MAGNET hung in a hardware shop,
And all around was a loving crop
Of scissors and needles, nails and knives.
Offering love for all their lives;
But for iron the magnet felt no whim,
Though he charmed iron, it charmed not him,
From needles and nails and knives he'd turn,
For he'd set his love on a Silver Churn!
His most aesthetic,
Very magnetic
Fancy took this turn—
"If I can wheedle
A knife or needle,
Why not a Silver Churn?"
And Iron and Steel expressed surprise,
The needles opened their well drilled eyes,
The pen-knives felt "shut up," no doubt,
The scissors declared themselves "cut out,"
The kettles they boiled with rage, 'tis said.
While every nail went off its head,
And hither and thither began to roam,
Till a hammer came up—and drove it home,
While this magnetic
Peripatetic
Lover he lived to learn,
By no endeavour.
Can Magnet ever
Attract a Silver Churn!
# Songs of a Savoyard/The Philosophic Pill

From The Yeomen of the Guard.
THE PHILOSOPHIC PILL.
I'VE wisdom from the East and from the West,
That's subject to no academic rule;
You may find it in the jeering of a jest,
Or distil it from the folly of a fool.
I can teach you with a quip, if I've a mind!
I can trick you into learning with a laugh;
Oh, winnow all my folly, and you'll find
A grain or two of truth among the chaff!
I can set a braggart quailing with a quip,
The upstart I can wither with a whim;
He may wear a merry laugh upon his lip,
But his laughter has an echo that is grim.
When they're offered to the world in merry guise,
Unpleasant truths are swallowed with a will—
For he who'd make his fellow creatures wise
Should always gild the philosophic pill!
# Songs of a Savoyard/The Judge's Song

From Trial by Jury.
THE JUDGE'S SONG.
WHEN I, good friends, was called to the Bar,
I'd an appetite fresh and hearty,
Bat I was, as many young barristers are,
An impecunious party.
I'd a swallow-tail coat of a beautiful blue—
A brief which I bought of a booby—
A couple of shirts and a collar or two.
And a ring that looked like a ruby!
In Westminster Hall I danced a dance,
Like a semi-despondent fury;
For I thought I should never hit on a chance
Of addressing a British Jury—
But I soon got tired of third class journeys,
And dinners of bread and water;
So I fell in love with a rich attorney's
Elderly, ugly daughter.
The rich attorney, he wiped his eyes,
And replied to my fond professions:
"You shall reap the reward of your enterprise,
At the Bailey and Middlesex Sessions.
You'll soon get used to her looks," said he,
"And a very nice girl you'll find her—
She may very well pass for forty-three
In the dusk, with a light behind her!"
The rich attorney was as good as his word:
The briefs came trooping gaily,
And every day my voice was heard
At the Sessions or Ancient Bailey.
All thieves who could my fees afford
Relied on my orations,
And many a burglar I've restored
To his friends and his relations.
At length I became as rich as the Gurneys—
An incubus then I thought her,
So I threw over that rich attorney's
Elderly, ugly daughter.
The rich attorney my character high
Tried vainly to disparage—
And now, if you please, I'm ready to try
This Breach of Promise of Marriage!
# Songs of a Savoyard/The Lord Chancellor's Song

From Iolanthe.
THE LORD CHANCELLOR'S SONG.
THE Law is the true embodiment
Of everything that's excellent.
It has no kind of fault or flaw,
And I, my lords, embody the Law.
The constitutional guardian I
Of pretty young Wards in Chancery,
All very agreeable girls—and none
Are over the age of twenty-one.
A pleasant occupation for
A rather susceptible Chancellor!
But though the compliment implied
Inflates me with legitimate pride,
It nevertheless can't be denied
That it has its inconvenient side.
For I'm not so old, and not so plain,
And I'm quite prepared to marry again,
But there'd be the deuce to pay in the Lords
If I fell in love with one of my Wards:
Which rather tries my temper, for
I'm such a susceptible Chancellor!   And everyone who'd marry a Ward
Must come to me for my accord:
So in my court I sit all day.
Giving agreeable girls away,
With one for him—and one for he—
And one for you—and one for ye—
And one for thou—and one for thee—
But never, oh never a one for me!
Which is exasperating, for
A highly susceptible Chancellor!
# Songs of a Savoyard/The Merryman and his Maid

From The Yeomen of the Guard.
THE MERRYMAN AND HIS MAID.
He.I HAVE a song to sing, O!
She.Sing me your song, O!
He.It is sung to the moon
By a love-lorn loon,
Who fled from the mocking throng, O!
It's the song of a merryman, moping mum,
Whose soul was sad, and whose glance was glum,
Who sipped no sup, and who craved no crumb,
As he sighed for the love of a ladye.
Heighdy! heighdy!
Misery me—lackadaydee!
He sipped no sup, and he craved no crumb,
As he sighed for the love of a ladye!
She.I have a song to sing, O!
He.Sing me your song, O!
She.It is sung with the ring
Of the song maids sing
Who love with a love life-long, O!
It's the song of a merrymaid, peerly proud,
Who loved a lord, and who laughed aloud
At the moan of the merryman, moping mum,
Whose soul was sore, whose glance was glum,
Who sipped no sup, and who craved no crumb,
As he sighed for the love of a ladye!
Heighdy! heighdy!
Misery me—lackadaydee!
He sipped no sup, and he craved no crumb,
As he sighed for the love of a ladye.
He.I have a song to sing, O!
She.Sing me your song, O!
He.It is sung to the knell Of a churchyard bell,
And a doleful dirge, ding dong, O!
It's a song of a popinjay, bravely born,
Who turned up his noble nose with scorn
At the humble merrymaid, peerly proud,
Who loved that lord, and who laughed aloud
At the moan of the merryman, moping mum,
Whose soul was sad, whose glance was glum,
Who sipped no sup, and who craved no crumb,
As he sighed for the love of a ladye!
Heighdy! heighdy!
Misery me—lackadaydee!
He sipped no sup, and he craved no crumb,
As he sighed for the love of a ladye!
She.I have a song to sing, O!
He.Sing me your song, O!
She.It is sung with a sigh And a tear in the eye,
For it tells of a righted wrong, O!
It's a song of a merrymaid, once so gay,
Who turned on her heel and tripped away
From the peacock popinjay, bravely born,
Who turned up his noble nose with scorn
At the humble heart that he did not prize;
And it tells how she begged, with downcast eyes,
For the love of the merryman, moping mum.
Whose soul was sad and whose glance was glum,
Who sipped no sup, and who craved no crumb,
As he sighed for the love of a ladye!
Both.Heighdy! heighdy!
Misery me—lackadaydee!
His pains were o'er, and he sighed no more,
For he lived in the love of a ladye!
# Songs of a Savoyard/The Mighty Must

From Princess Ida.
THE MIGHTY MUST.
COME mighty Must!
Inevitable Shall!
In thee I trust.
Time weaves my coronal!
Go mocking Is!
Go disappointing Was!
That I am this
Ye are the cursed cause!
Yet humble second shall be first,
I ween;
And dead and buried be the curst
Has Been!
Oh weak Might Be!
Oh May, Might, Could, Would, Should!
How powerless ye
For evil or for good!
In every sense
Your moods I cheerless call,
Whate'er your tense
Ye are Imperfect, all!
Ye have deceived the trust I've shown
In ye!
Away! The Mighty Must alone
Shall be!