OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Notable South Australians/Captain John Watts

Layout 2
Captain John Watts
WHO was for over twenty years Postmaster-General of South Australia, died at North Adelaide March 28, 1873, aged 87. He was a native of Ireland, and the son of a clergyman. At an early age, with several of his brothers, he entered the military service during the long war with Napoleon, and first served in the West Indies, where he was located for several years. He next accompanied Governor Macquarie to Sydney as his aide-de-camp, and occupied that position until the Governor left, when Capt. Watts returned to England, where he married, resigned his commission in the 73rd Regiment of the Line, and retired into private life. He arrived in South Australia on March 8, 1841, by the "John Cooper," and shortly after received the appointment of Postmaster-General, in succession to his brother who had previously held that post. He retained this position until July 10, 1861, when he relinquished it, and was succeeded by Mr. J. W. Lewis. On his retirement his subordinates presented him with a handsome testimonial. He had the misfortune to lose his wife, to whom he had been married for fifty years, only three weeks before his death.
# Notable South Australians/Carl Julius Hans Bertram

Layout 2
​ ​days after his arrival in the colony the writer of this sketch heard him perform one of Beethoven's Sonatas, and though his visitor had the music before him, he could not detect a single false note. Though Herr Bertram's past career is marked with success, it may certainly be predicted that his future in this colony will be of that triumphant character which the genius and ability of such a talented composer and musician undoubtedly deserves.
# Notable South Australians/Charles Bonney

Layout 2
Charles Bonney.
THIS venerable South Australian pioneer arrived in Sydney, N.S.Wales, in 1834, to occupy a Government appointment. In 1836 he went into the country, where his first bush experience was an attempt to find a route for stock from the Murray to the new settlement of Port Phillip. In consequence of the flooded state of the rivers he was compelled to return, but went out in December in the same year, and safely reached his destination early in 1837. In the following March he took the first sheep, (a mob of 10,000) ​overland to the new settlement. In January, 1838, Mr. Bonney accompanied the first overland expedition with stock to South Australia, and in the following year went in charge of an expedition with cattle to open a direct road from Port Phillip to this colony through the Portland Bay district. After encountering difficulties from want of water, he succeeded in reaching Adelaide. In 1842, Mr. Bonney accepted the office of Commissioner of Crown Lands, and held it until the establishment of responsible Government in 1857. Was a member of the House of Assembly in the first Parliament, and held the position of Commissioner of Crown Lands until 1858, when the Ministry went out of office, and he visited England. Returned to the colony in 1862, in connection with a Mining Company, and in 1865 was elected a member of the Legislative Council. Accepted the office of Manager of Railways in 1869, and in 1871 became Inspector of Lands purchased on credit. Mr. Bonney finally retired from the Public Service in 1880. He at present resides in Sydney, New South Wales, but, as of yore, takes great interest in South Australia. Recently his portrait was placed in the Town Hall, Norwood, the Corporation of which have taken this step to show their appreciation of one who was the first and most popular Mayor of that Municipality.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/Additional Canons 3/The Canons of Carthage/Canons/Canon CXXIX

Canon CXXIX. (Greek cxxx.)
That slaves and freedmen and all infamous persons ought not to bring accusation.
To all it seemed good that no slaves or freedmen, properly so called, be admitted to accusation nor any of those who by the public laws are debarred from bringing accusation in criminal proceedings. This also is the case with all those who have the stain of infamy, that is actors, and persons subject to turpitudes, also heretics, or heathen, or Jews; but even all those to whom the right of bringing accusation is denied, are not forbidden to bring accusation in their own suits.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon CXXIX.
A slave, and a freedman, and he who before was accused of any of these crimes on account of which he is not admitted in court, and a player, and a heathen, and a heretic, and a Jew.
[There is no verb to finish the sentence. However, this is intended as a continuation of the epitome of the former canon, the words to be supplied being “are not to give witness.”]
Johnson.
See Can., Const., 6.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/Additional Canons 3/The Canons of Carthage/Canons/Canon CXVII

Canon CXVII. (Greek cxviii.)
Of peoples converted from the Donatists.
Item, it seemed good, since it was so decreed some years ago by a plenary council, that whatever churches were erected in a diocese before the laws were made concerning Donatists when they became Catholic, should pertain to the sees of those bishops through whom their return to Catholic unity was brought about; but after the laws whatever churches communicated were to belong there where they belonged when they were Donatists. But because many controversies afterward arose and are still springing up between bishops concerning dioceses, which were not then at all in prospect, now it has seemed good to this council, that wherever there was a Catholic and a Donatist party, pertaining to different sees, at whatever time unity has been or shall be made, whether before or after the laws, the churches shall belong to that see to which the Catholic church which was already there belonged.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon CXVII.
Whenever conversions and unions of Donatists are effected, let them be subject to that throne to which the Catholic Church which was formerly there was subject.
This is Canon ix. of Carthage, a.d. 418.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/Additional Canons 3/The Canons of Carthage/Canons/Canon CXXII

Canon CXXII. (Greek cxxiii.)
The sentence of the elected judges ought not to be spurned.
From the judges chosen by common consent of the parties, no appeal can be taken; and whoever shall be found to have carried such an appeal and contumaciously to be unwilling to submit to the judges, when this has been proved to the primate, let him give letters, that no one of the bishops should communicate with him until he yield.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon CXXII.
A judge chosen by both parties cannot be repudiated.
This is Canon xiv. of Carthage, a.d. 418.
Johnson.
See Canons 76 (79) and 80 (83).
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/Additional Canons 3/The Canons of Carthage/Canons/Canon CXVI

Canon CXVI. (Greek cxvii.)
That the Saints say with accuracy, “Forgive us our trespasses.”
Likewise also it seemed good, that whoever wished that these words of the Lord’s prayer, when we say, “Forgive us our trespasses” are said by the saints out of humility and not in truth let them be anathema. For who would make a lying prayer, not to men but to God? Who would say with his lips that he wished his sins forgiven him, but in his heart that he had no sins to be forgiven.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon CXVI.
(Lacking.)
This is Canon viij. of Carthage, a.d. 418.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/Additional Canons 3/The Canons of Carthage/Canons/Canon CXVIII

Canon CXVIII. (Greek cxix.)
How bishops as well Catholic as those who have been converted from the Donatists are to divide between themselves the dioceses.
So, too, it has seemed good that if a bishop has been converted from the Donatists to Catholic unity, that equally there should be divided what shall have been so found where there were two parties; that is, that some places should pertain to one and some to the other; and let the division be made by him who has been the longest time in the episcopate, and let the younger choose. But should there be only one place let it belong to him who is found to be the nearer. But should the distance be equal to each of the two cathedrals let it belong to the one the people may choose. But should the old Catholics wish their own bishop, and if the same be the case with the converted Donatists, let the will of the greater number prevail, but should the parties be equal, let it belong to him who has been longest bishop. But if so many places be found in which there were both parties, that an equal division is impossible, as for example, if they are unequal in number, after those places have been distributed which have an equal number, the place that remains over shall be disposed of as is provided above in the case where there is but one place to be treated.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon CXVIII.
Those who have been converted from Donatus, let them divide the dioceses; and let the senior bishop make the division, and the junior choose which he will.
This is Canon x. of Carthage, a.d. 418.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/Additional Canons 3/The Canons of Carthage/Canons/Canon CXX

Canon CXX. (Greek cxxi.)
Of those who intrude upon peoples which they think belong to them, without the consent of those by whom they are held.
Item, it seemed good that whatever bishops seek the peoples whom they consider to pertain to their see, not by bringing their causes before the episcopal judges, but rush in while another is holding the place, all such, (whether said people are willing to receive them or no) shall lose their case. And whoever have done this, if the contention between the two bishops is not yet finished but still going on, let him depart who intruded without the decree of the ecclesiastical judges; nor let anyone flatter himself that he will retain [what he has seized] if he shall obtain letters from the primate, but whether he has such letters or has them not, it is suitable that he who holds and receives his letters should make it appear then that he has held the church pertaining to him peaceably. But if he has referred any question, let the cause be decided by the episcopal judges, whether those whom the primates have appointed for them, or the neighbouring bishops whom they have chosen by common consent.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon CXX.
Let no one seize for himself what he thinks belongs to him: but let the bishops judge or whom the Primate will give, or whom the neighbouring bishops shall give with his consent. But whosoever has received letters from the primate concerning the keeping [of such regions and churches] merely deceives himself.
This is Canon xij. of Carthage, a.d. 418.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/Additional Canons 3/The Canons of Carthage/Canons/Canon CXXI

Canon CXXI. (Greek cxxii.)
Of those who neglect the peoples belonging to them.
Item, it seemed good that whoever neglect to bring the places belonging to their see into Catholic unity should be admonished by the neighbouring diligent bishops, that they delay no longer to do this; but if within six months from the day of the convention they do nothing, let them pertain to him who can win them: but with this proviso however, that if he to whom it seemed they naturally belonged can prove that this neglect was intentional and more efficacious in winning them than the greater apparent diligence of others; when the episcopal judges shall be convinced that this is the case, they shall restore the places to his see. If the bishops between whom the cause lies are of different provinces, let the Primate in whose province the place is situated about which there is the dispute, appoint judges; but if by mutual consent they have chosen as judges the neighbouring bishops, let one or three be chosen: so that if they choose three they may follow the sentence of all or of two.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon CXXI.
If any neglect what belongs to their jurisdiction, let them be admonished; and if they shall do nothing within a six month, let them be adjudged to him who can win them. But if they have committed the neglect out of policy so as not to irritate the heretics, and this shall appear to have been the case, their sees shall be restored to them, by the judgment of the bishops either appointed or elected.
This is Canon xiij. of Carthage, a.d. 418.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/Additional Canons 3/The Canons of Carthage/Canons/Canon CXXIV

Canon CXXIV. (Greek cxxv.)
Of bishops who shall lie with regard to Donatists’ communions.
If it shall be proven that any bishop has lied concerning the communion of those [who had been Donatists], and had said that they had communicated when he knew it was an established fact that they had not done so, let him lose his bishoprick.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon CXXIV.
Whoso says that a man, whom he knows does not communicate, does communicate is to be deprived of his episcopate.
This is Canon xvj. of Carthage, a.d. 418.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/Additional Canons 3/The Canons of Carthage/Canons/Canon CXXIII

Canon CXXIII. (Greek cxxiv.)
That if a bishop neglects his diocese he is to be deprived of communion.
If in the mother cathedrals a bishop should have been negligent against the heretics, let a meeting be held of the neighbouring diligent bishops, and let his negligence be pointed out to him, so that he can have no excuse. But if within six months after this meeting, if an execution was in his own province, and he had taken no care to convert them to Catholic unity, no one shall communicate with him till he does his duty. But if no executor shall have come to the places, then the fault shall not be laid to the bishop.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon CXXIII.
A bishop who spurns the care of heretics, and if after being warned he continues for six months in his contempt, and has no care for their conversion, is to be excommunicated.
This is Canon xv. of Carthage, a.d. 418.
Johnson.
So [i.e. “Metropoles”] I turn matrices cathedræ. I know indeed there were no fixed ecclesiastical metropoles, in Africa; but they had civil metropoles called by that name, can. 86, (89) which see.
Of these officers [i.e. “Executors “] see can. 97 (100).
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/Additional Canons 3/The Canons of Carthage/Canons/Canon CXXV

Canon CXXV. (Greek cxxvi.)
That presbyters and clerics are not to appeal except to African Synods.
Item, it seemed good that presbyters, deacons, or other of the lower clergy who are to be tried, if they question the decision of their bishops, the neighbouring bishops having been invited by them with the consent of their bishops, shall hear them and determine whatever separates them. But should they think an appeal should be carried from them, let them not carry the appeal except to African councils or to the primates of their provinces. But whoso shall think of carrying an appeal across seas he shall be admitted to communion by no one in Africa.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon CXXV.
A presbyter and deacons, who has been condemned by his own bishop, let him appeal to the neighbouring bishops: but let them not cross the sea. In Africa they shall be excommunicated.
This is Canon xvij. of Carthage, a.d. 418.
Johnson.
A repetition of Canon 28 (31).
# North Dakota Law Review/Volume 1/Number 2/Retiring Chief Justice Commends Association

RETIRING CHIEF JUSTICE COMMENDS ASSOCIATION
The following represents a portion of the letter transmitted recently by Hon. H. A. Bronson, retiring chief justice of the Supreme Court, to the President of the Association:
"Already, the Bar Association has made auspicious beginnings towards the attainment of its potential possibilities. A spirit of co-operation, interest and activity is manifested by the Committees of the Association and the membership at large. Through this co-operation, interest and activity, substantial results are already in evidence for the Bench and Bar of this State in the better and more efficient administration of justice.
"Now, to promote the betterment of the work of the Association, and the better co-operation and interest of its membership, there appears, through your initiative and that of your Executive Committee, a beginning in the field of journalism through the publication of a monthly journal, prepared, edited, and published by lawyers, members of the Association. This, at least, is the attainment of one objective which for some time I have inherently desired to see accomplished.
"As the New Year is nigh at hand, I desire to express my expectant wish that the Association, under your guidance and that of its Executive Committee, may gather unto itself, in the New Year, greater strength and still greater attainment of the beneficent purposes for which it has been established and that the monthly journal, just initiated, may enlist the active interest, co-operation and support of the entire Bar of this State."
Harrison A. Bronson Chief Justice.
In acknowledging this letter, President Cupler expressed the kindly feelings existing on the part of the Bar towards the retiring member of our Supreme Court.
# North Dakota Law Review/Volume 1/Number 2/Uniform Interpretations of Canons of Ethics

UNIFORM INTERPRETATIONS OF CANONS OF ETHICS
Members of the Association have doubtless noted, from the publication of the opinions of the Committee on Professional Ethics and Grievances in the Journal, that this committee has begun to avail itself of the added authority given it some time since. A wide field of usefulness has been opened to it. One of the particular advantages which it is hoped will result from the enlarged power of the Committee in respect to problems submitted from state and local bar association, is a gradual unification of the interpretation of the canons of ethics by bar associations throughout the country. Writing on this point, in an article in the July, 1922, issue of the Journal, Chairman Thomas Francis Howe of the Association's committee said:
"Most, if not all, of these local associations have adopted the Canons of Ethics of this Association, and many of the questions which their ​committees have to answer require that the canons be construed in order that the principles laid down therein may be applied to the question to be answered. Frequently the members of these committees differ as to the construction and application of the canons, and would be glad to avail themselves of some uniform interpretation. When such doubt exists there is at present no committee of this Association of whom they may request an opinion for their guidance, and thus enable them to make their answers uniform with that of similar committees of other associations. Lacking such, they may give an answer on an involved or complicated question that may appear at variance with that expressed on a similar question by the committee of some other association."—American Bar Association Journal.
# North Dakota Law Review/Volume 1/Number 3/Compilation of N. D. Supplement

COMPILATION OF N. D. SUPPLEMENT
In addition to having the careful consideration of the Executive Committee of the Association, this matter had the benefit of the best judgment of an exceptionally strong special committee, chairmanned by Hon. Sveinbjorn Johnson, Judge of the Supreme Court. It was recognized that there was presented a distinct opportunity for service to the State by the Association, and the original plan, which also met with the approval of individual attorneys who stand high in the profession, was to have the work placed under the direct supervision of the Supreme Court, the actual work to be parcelled out to a number of attorneys throughout the State.
Costs of publication figures ran so high, however, that the plan had to give way, and the final result was the introduction of House Bill No. 131, which provides for the publication of a supplement to the Compiled Laws of 1913 by the Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, at a cost to the State of $6,000, private copies to sell at $14.00.
In this connection attention is called at this time to possible errors and omissions heretofore discovered by individual attorneys in the context, citations or indexes of previous publications, and the request is made that the same be called to the attention of the Chairman of the Committee, Hon. Sveinbjorn Johnson, to the end that the same may be corrected in the new publication.
# North Dakota Law Review/Volume 1/Number 3/Facts to Bear in Mind

FACTS TO BEAR IN MIND
What is termed “extreme radicalism” has in the United States today 70 papers printed in English, and 200 printed in foreign languages. In addition to that there are 269 such papers imported regularly from foreign countries and circulated in the United States.
# North Dakota Law Review/Volume 1/Number 3/Citizenship and Americanization Committee

CITIZENSHIP AND AMERICANIZATION COMMITTEE
The following is quoted from the 1924 report of the State Bar Association Committee on Citizenship and Americanization, of which Hon. John Knauf, of Jamestown, is Chairman:
   “Your Committee, with other members of the Bar, have been the leaders in over 4000 patriotic celebrations, generally speaking, always planning the celebrations. That they have spoken at some forty county teachers’ institutes, reaching some 4482 teachers, holding our youth in one-room district schools, with inspiration and comely methods of carrying home the strength and beauty of our institutions to over 169,300 pupils, and aiding and assisting 730 town and city school teachers in the patriotic work they have to do.
   “Your Committee, and other members of the Bar, have been responsible for, or the inspiration of, over 4400 district school and rural consolidated school celebrations in the State, reaching some over 160,000 of our students of school age and their parents—one-third of our entire state population within one year. These celebrations, partaking of patriotic song services, declamations, essays, letters, orations and pageants. We believe the work has been worth while, that the youthful mind of this State has been more fully developed in and for the cause of good government.”
# North Dakota Law Review/Volume 1/Number 3

BAR BRIEFS
PUBLISHED MONTHLY AT BISMARCK
——By——
STATE BAR ASSOCIATION OF NORTH DAKOTA
Application for entry as Second Class Matter at the Postoffice at Bismarck, N. D., Pending
* Washington
* Review of Important Decisions
* Legislative
* Compilation of N. D. Supplement
* Printing and Supplies
* Facts to Bear in Mind
* Citizenship and Americanization Committee
* Editorial English
* 1925 Annual Meeting
* The Just System
* Coolidge and Economy
* Extracts from Address of President Cupler to Minnesota Bar Association
* Respect for Law
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# North Dakota Law Review/Volume 1/Number 3/Editorial English

EDITORIAL ENGLISH
“Submission of the question would be clearly a recommendation to the voters that they should adopt it, for Legislatures do not submit, nor are they justified in submitting, issues the members of which do not themselves regard as just and sound.”—Forum, Feb. 11.