OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book XV/Paryaya 10

10. Paryāya the tenth.
Translated: Aufrecht, Ind. Stud. i. 134; Griffith, ii. 192.
1. So then, to the houses of whatever king a thus-knowing Vrātya may come as guest,—
2. He should esteem him better than himself; so does he not offend (ā-vraçc) against dominion; so does he not offend against royalty.
⌊That is, 'he [the king] should esteem him [the Vrātya] better,' etc.⌋ The Berlin mss. read, as the sense requires, mānayet táthā, nor was any deviation from this noted in the mss. collated before publication; those compared later, however, all give mānaye táthā; ⌊and so do all of SPP's authorities, including his then living reciters, but excepting his ms. C$^P$, which has mānayet táthā, secunda manu, and mānaye t-, prima manu.—Compare the case of yame dīrgham, yamed dīrgham, at xviii. 2. 3.⌋
3. Thence verily arose both sanctity (bráhman) and dominion; they said: Whom shall we enter?
'Thence' (átas) Aufrecht understands to mean "out of him (the Vrātya)"—which is possible, but doubtful: compare átas in vs. 5.
4. Let sanctity enter Brihaspati [and] dominion Indra; thus verily: it was said (íti).
Or the iti means 'he (the Vrātya) said'; Aufrecht so understands it. The mss. make very bad work over the verb in this verse: Bp. reads pra॰viçatu, Bs.P.M.O.T.K. prāviçatu, all without accent; E. has prā́ viçatu, R. prāviçátu, D. pra॰viçátu. The true reading is doubtless praviçátu, and our text should be emended to this; the situation is one in which an accent on the verb-form is called for. There is no reason for understanding pra-ā, and the prolongation of simple pra to prā is wholly unsuited to this book. ⌊SPP's authorities show a fairly bewildering variety of differences, in respect to bráhma praviçátu: see his note, p. 334.⌋ The metrical definition of the Anukr. ⌊6 + 7 + 8: Ind. Stud. viii. 129⌋ does not fit at all.
5. Thence (átas) verily sanctity entered Brihaspati [and] dominion Indra.
For prā́viçat the pada-text has prá: aviçat; doubtless it should be pra॰áviçat.
​6. This earth verily is Prajāpati, the sky is Indra.
7. This fire verily is sanctity, yonder Āditya is dominion.
8. To him comes sanctity, he becomes possessed of the splendor of sanctity (brahmavarcasín),—
9. Who knows earth as Brihaspati, fire as sanctity.
10. To him comes Indra's quality, he becomes possessed of Indra's quality,—
11. Who knows Āditya as dominion, the sky as Indra.
# Bay v. Merrill & Ring Logging Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
243 U.S. 40
Bay v. Merrill & Ring Logging Company
Argued: January 30 and 31, 1917. --- Decided: March 6, 1917
Messrs. John T. Casey, George F. Hannan, and Charles R. Pierce for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. E. C. Hughes, Maurice McMicken, Otto B. Rupp, and H. J. Ramsey for defendant in error.
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bayard Taylor

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Bayard Taylor."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Bayard Taylor", a poem by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
* "Bayard Taylor", a poem by John Greenleaf Whittier
* "To Bayard Taylor", a poem by Sidney Lanier
* "To Bayard Taylor", a poem by Edmund Clarence Stedman

### See also

* Author:Bayard Taylor
# Bayard v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
127 U.S. 246
Bayard v. United States
Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for plaintiff in error.
S. V. White and W. Hallett Phillips, for defendant in error.
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Arabian Nights (Sterrett)

Scheherazade went on with her story
Arabian Nights
Edited by
Hildegarde Hawthorne
Illustrated by
Virginia Frances Sterrett
The Penn Publishing Company
Philadelphia
Copyright 1928 by
The Penn Publishing Company
Contents
The Merchant and the Genie
The Three Calenders
Aladdin
The Caliph Haroun al Raschid
Ali Baba
Sindbad the Sailor
Illustrations in Color
Illustrations in Black and White
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1952, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 71 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Aunt Jo's Scrap-Bag/Volume 5

Aunt Jo's Scrap-Bag.
JIMMY'S CRUISE IN THE PINAFORE, Etc.
By LOUISA M. ALCOTT,
AUTHOR OF "LITTLE WOMEN," "AN OLD-FASHIONED GIRL," "LITTLE MEN," "HOSPITAL SKETCHES."
BOSTON:
ROBERTS BROTHERS.
1880.
page
Copyright,
By Louisa M. Alcott.
1879.
University Press: John Wilson and Son, Cambridge.
page
CONTENTS.
page
​ TOM TUCKER, MIDSHIPMITE.
# Bells and Pomegranates, First Series/Marching Along

Dramatic Lyrics.
CAVALIER TUNES,
I.—MARCHING ALONG.
# Bells and Pomegranates, First Series/Through the Metidja to Abd-El-Kadr

THROUGH THE METIDJA TO ABD-EL-KADR.—1842.
# Bells and Pomegranates, First Series/My Wife Gertrude

III.—MY WIFE GERTRUDE
# Bells and Pomegranates, First Series/The Pied Piper of Hamelin

Dramatic Lyrics.
THE PIED PIPER OF HAMELIN;
A Child's Story.
(Written for, and inscribed to, W. M. the Younger.)
# Bells and Pomegranates, Second Series/England in Italy

ENGLAND IN ITALY.
(Piano di Sorrento.)
# Bells and Pomegranates, First Series/Rudel and the Lady of Tripoli

QUEEN-WORSHIP.
I.—RUDEL AND THE LADY OF TRIPOLI.
# Bells and Pomegranates, Second Series/Earth's Immortalities

Layout 2
Fame.
See, as the prettiest graves will do in time, Our poet's wants the freshness of its prime; Spite of the sexton's browsing horse, the sods Have struggled through its binding osier rods; Headstone and half-sunk footstone lean awry, Wanting the brick-work promised by-and-by; How the minute grey lichens, plate o'er plate, Have softened down the crisp-cut name and date!
Love.
So, the year's done with  (Love me for ever!) All March begun with,  April's endeavour; May-wreaths that bound me  June needs must sever; Now snows fall round me,  Quenching June's fever—  (Love me for ever!)
# Browning v. City of Waycross

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
233 U.S. 16
Browning v. City of Waycross
Argued: and submitted March 11, 1914. --- Decided: April 6, 1914
Messrs. Richard A. Jones, J. L. Sweat, and Nathan Frank for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 17 intentionally omitted]
Mr. T. S. Felder, Attorney General of Georgia, and Mr. W. W. Lambdin for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 18 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Brownlow v. Schwartz

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
261 U.S. 216
Brownlow v. Schwartz
Argued: Jan. 16, 1923. --- Decided: Feb 19, 1923
Messrs. Robert L. Williams and F. H. Stephens, both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. W. Gwynn Gardiner, of Washington, D. C., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Browning v. De Ford

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
178 U.S. 196
Browning v. De Ford
Argued: April 16, 17, 1900. --- Decided: May 21, 1900
This was an action in the nature of trover by the surviving partners of the firm of Henry W. King & Company, and four other creditors, as chattel mortgagees, against Charles H. DeFord, sheriff of Oklahoma county, to recover the value of a stock of goods seized by the defendant and sold under writs of attachment issued against the property of the firm of W. F. Wolfe & Son, in suits instituted by general creditors of that firm.
Defendant justified under these writs of attachment, and alleged that the indebtedness of each of the attaching plaintiffs was procured by W. F. Wolfe & Son by means of false and fraudulent representations as to their financial standing and credit; that the mortgage was executed by such firm in pursuance of a conspiracy betweenth e firm and the mortgage creditors, who had knowledge of the fraudulent acts of the firm, and knew that the mortgage was given with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud their general creditors; that the mortgage was neither given nor accepted in good faith for the purpose of securing a bona fide indebtedness; but that the indebtedness was in part, if not wholly, false, fictitious, and trumped up to suit the occasion, and that the real intent of Wolfe & Son in executing the mortgage was to place their property beyond the reach of their creditors.
The case was tried before a jury, and resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant, which was affirmed by the supreme court of the territory; whereupon plaintiffs brought the case to this court both by writ of error and appeal. Another suit in attachment brought by E. S. Jaffray & Co. against Wolfe & Son, in which the mortgage was set up as a defense and the facts were the same, also resulted in a judgment that the mortgage was fraudulent. Jaffray v. Wolfe, 4 Okla. 303, 47 Pac. 496.
Mr. John W. Shartel for plaintiffs in error and appellants.
Mr. A. A. Birney for defendant in error and appellee.
Mr. Justice Brown delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Browning v. Hooper

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
269 U.S. 396
Browning v. Hooper
Argued: Nov. 17, 1925. --- Decided: Jan 4, 1926
Messrs. Wm. R. Watkins, of Fort Worth, Tex., and C. K. Walsh, of Wichita Falls, Tex., for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from page 397 intentionally omitted]
Mr. John R. Moore, of Archer City, Tex., for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 398-399 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Brownsville Herald/1930/Schneider After Another Record

Eddie August Schneider as the subject of an article written by the Associated Press and published in the Brownsville Herald of Brownsville, Texas on August 21, 1930.
Schneider After Another Record. Municipal Airport, Los Angeles, California; August 21, 1930 (Associated Press) Eddie Schneider, newly crowned east-west junior transcontinental speed king, took off at 6:17:30 a.m. (Pacific Standard Time) today in an effort to establish a new west-east junior transcontinental air record. He planned to make his first stop at Albuquerque, New Mexico. Despite a load of 140 gallons of gasoline, Schneider pulled his little monoplane into a fast climb and quickly was out of sight.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works could have had their copyright renewed between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st of the 29th year.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# As with Glad­ness, Men of Old (unsourced)

As with gladness, men of old Did the guiding star behold As with joy they hailed its light Leading onward, beaming bright So, most glorious Lord, may we Evermore be led to Thee.
As with joyful steps they sped To that lowly manger bed There to bend the knee before Him Whom Heaven and earth adore; So may we with willing feet Ever seek Thy mercy seat.
As they offered gifts most rare At that manger rude and bare; So may we with holy joy, Pure and free from sin’s alloy, All our costliest treasures bring, Christ, to Thee, our heavenly King.
Holy Jesus, every day Keep us in the narrow way; And, when earthly things are past, Bring our ransomed souls at last Where they need no star to guide, Where no clouds Thy glory hide.
In the heavenly country bright, Need they no created light; Thou its Light, its Joy, its Crown, Thou its Sun which goes not down; There forever may we sing Alleluias to our King!
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Asakura v. City of Seattle

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 332
Asakura v. City of Seattle
Argued: and Submitted Feb. 25, 1924. ---

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Asakura v. City of Seattle/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 332
Asakura v. City of Seattle
Argued: and Submitted Feb. 25, 1924. ---
City of Opelika v. Opelika Sewer Co265 U.S. 224 (1924)

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Asarco Incorporated v. Kadish

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Brennan
United States Supreme Court
490 U.S. 605
Asarco Incorporated v. Kadish
No. 87-1661 Argued: Feb. 27, 1989. --- Decided: May 30, 1989
Syllabus
Among other things, the New Mexico-Arizona Enabling Act of 1910 granted Arizona certain lands, excluding mineral lands, in trust for the support of public schools, and, in § 28, provided that granted lands cannot be sold or leased except upon compliance with certain conditions regarding advertising, bidding, and appraisal. Arizona incorporated these conditions into Article 10 of its Constitution. After this Court held the original mineral land exclusion inapplicable to lands not known to be mineral at the time of the grant, Wyoming v. United States, 255 U.S. 489, 41 S.Ct. 393, 65 L.Ed. 742 (1921), Congress passed the Jones Act in 1927, extending the terms of the original grant to encompass all mineral lands. The Enabling Act was also amended in 1936 and 1951 to clarify the procedures for leasing granted lands for specific purposes. The latter amendment expressly extinguished the § 28 restrictions on leases of granted lands for the development of hydrocarbon substances. Arizona's own law governing mineral leases on state lands does not require that the lands be advertised, appraised, or leased for their full appraised value. Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 27-234(B). Respondents, individual taxpayers and a state teachers association, brought a state-court suit against the State Land Department and others, seeking a declaration that § 27-234(B) is void on the ground that it does not comply with the provisions of § 28 or § 10 of the Arizona Constitution and requesting appropriate injunctive relief. Petitioners, mineral lessees of state school lands, intervened as defendants. The trial court upheld the statute. The State Supreme Court reversed, ruling that § 27-234(B) is "unconstitutional and invalid as it pertains to nonhydrocarbon mineral leases," and remanded the case for the trial court, inter alia, to enter a judgment declaring § 27-234(B) invalid and to consider what further relief might be appropriate.
Held: The judgment is affirmed.
155 Ariz. 484, 747 P.2d 1183, affirmed.
Justice KENNEDY delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II-A, II-B-2, II-C, III, and IV, concluding that:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Asbell v. Kansas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
209 U.S. 251
Asbell v. Kansas
Argued: March 6, 1908. --- Decided: March 23, 1908
Messrs. Nelson Case and Archie D. Neale for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 251-253 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. E. L. Burton, C. E. Pile, and W. B. Glasse for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 253-254 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Moody delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barack Obama's remarks on the failed automobile industry bailout

12 December 2008
I am disappointed that the Senate could not reach agreement on a short-term plan for the auto industry. I share the frustration of so many about the decades of mismanagement in this industry that has helped deliver the current crisis. Those bad practices cannot be rewarded or continued. But I also know that millions of American jobs rely directly or indirectly on a viable auto industry, and that the beginnings of reform are at hand. The revival of our economy as a whole should not be a partisan issue. So I commend those in Congress as well as the Administration who tried valiantly to forge a compromise. My hope is that the Administration and the Congress will still find a way to give the industry the temporary assistance it needs while demanding the long-term restructuring that is absolutely required.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barack Obama's remarks on the terrorist attacks in Mumbai

28 November 2008
Michelle and I send our deepest condolences to the loved ones of the American citizens who lost their lives in the outrageous terrorist attacks in Mumbai. Our thoughts and prayers are with them, and with all who have been touched by this terrible tragedy.
These terrorists who targeted innocent civilians will not defeat India's great democracy, nor shake the will of a global coalition to defeat them. The United States must stand with India and all nations and people who are committed to destroying terrorist networks, and defeating their hate-filled ideology.
There is one president at a time. I will continue to closely monitor the situation on the ground in Mumbai, and am grateful for the cooperation of the Bush Administration in keeping me and my staff updated. We fully support the Bush Administration's efforts to protect American citizens and assist the government of India during this tragic time.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barack Obama's remarks on rising unemployment rates

4 December 2008
The 533,000 jobs lost last month, the worst job loss in 34 years, is more than a dramatic reflection of the growing economic crisis we face. Each of those lost jobs represents a personal crisis for a family somewhere in America. Our economy has already lost nearly 2 million jobs during this recession, which is why we need an Economic Recovery Plan that will save or create at least 2.5 million more jobs over two years while we act decisively to maintain the flows of credit on which so many American families and American businesses depend.
There are no quick or easy fixes to this crisis, which has been many years in the making, and it's likely to get worse before it gets better. But now is the time to respond with urgent resolve to put people back to work and get our economy moving again. At the same time, this painful crisis also provides us with an opportunity to transform our economy to improve the lives of ordinary people by rebuilding roads and modernizing schools for our children, investing in clean energy solutions to break our dependence on imported oil, and making an early down payment on the long-term reforms that will grow and strengthen our economy for all Americans for years to come.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barack Obama's remarks to the International Olympic Committee

Taped remarks delivered on 21 November 2008.
Mister President; members of the International Olympic Committee; ladies and gentlemen.
While I'm unable to be there in person, I want to take this opportunity to speak with you because I deeply believe in the Olympic mission, and have long supported hosting the Olympic and Paralympic Games in my home city of Chicago. Over the past two years, I've spoken often about my belief that, while we may come from different places and backgrounds, there are certain shared values that unite us. Values at the heart of the Olympic movement: friendship, excellence, and mutual respect.
In the coming years, my administration will bring a fresh perspective on America's role and responsibilities around the world. But if we are to truly meet our shared challenges, we must all work together. By uniting the world in a peaceful celebration of human achievement, the Olympic Games reminds us that this is possible. The United States would be honored to have the opportunity to host the Games and serve the Olympic movement.
As President-elect, I see the Olympic and Paralymic Games as an opportunity for our nation to reach out, welcome the world to our shores, and strengthen our friendships across the globe.
Thank you very much.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cardinal Sporting Goods Company v. Eagleton

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
374 U.S. 496
Cardinal Sporting Goods Company v. Eagleton
Norman Diamond, for appellants.
Samuel H. Liberman, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse