OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/28th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 3

Chap. III.—An Act to authorize the President of the United States to direct transfers of appropriation in the naval service, under certain circumstances.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Unexpended balances to be transferred for the increase, &c. of the navy. That upon the application of the Secretary of the Navy, the President of the United States shall have authority to direct the transfer from unexpended balances of appropriations for the Naval Service, of the sum of two hundred thousand dollars, or so much thereof as the public service may require during the present fiscal year to the appropriation for “the increase, repairs, armament, and equipment of the Navy, and wear and tear of vessels in commission.”Not to be transferred if wanted for original purposes, &c. But no part of said sum shall be transferred from any unexpended balance which may be necessary for the purposes for which the appropriation was originally made; nor from any unexpended balances of appropriations for the respective Navy Yards and Docks. Nor shall ​the transfer be made from any head or object of appropriation which may require another appropriation at any future time to supply the deficiency created by said transfer.
Approved, February 23, 1844.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/28th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 17

Chap. XVII.—An Act for the relief of the citizens of towns upon the lands of the United States, under certain circumstances.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,When public lands are occupied as a town site, corporate authorities, &c. to enter the same in trust for the occupants. That whenever any portion of the surveyed public lands has been or shall be settled upon and occupied as a town site, and therefore not subject to entry under the existing pre-emption laws, it shall be lawful, in case such town or place shall be incorporated, for the corporate authorities thereof, and, if not incorporated, for the judges of the county court for the county in which such town may be situated, to enter, at the proper land office, and at the minimum price, the land so settled and occupied, in trust, for the several use and benefit of the occupants thereof, according to their respective interests;Execution of the trust, &c. to be regulated by the Legislature. Proviso. the execution of which trust, as to the disposal of the lots in such town, and the proceeds of the sales thereof, to be conducted under such rules and regulations as may be prescribed by the legislative authority of the State or Territory in which the same is situated: Provided, That the entry of the land intended by this act be made prior to the commencement of the public sale of the body of land in which it is included, and that the entry shall include only such land as is actually occupied by the town, and be made in conformity to the legal subdivisions of the public lands authorized by the act of twenty-fourth April, one thousand eight hundred and twenty, and shall not in the whole exceed three hundred and twenty acres;Any act of trustees not made agreeable to regulations, void. Authorities of Weston, &c. And provided, also, That any act of said trustees, not made in conformity to the rules and regulations herein alluded to, shall be void and of none effect: And provided, also, That the corporate authorities of the town of Weston, in the county of Platte, State of Missouri, or the county court of Platte county, in said State, shall be allowed twelve months, from and after the passage of this act, to enter at the proper land office, the lands upon which said town is situate.
Approved, May 23, 1844.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/28th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 30

Chap. XXX.—An Act relating to the port of entry in the district of Passamaquoddy, in the State of Maine.
Port of entry under act of March 3, 1803, ch. 26, sec. 4,to be a port of entry for vessels and cargoes from Cape of Good Hope and beyond.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the port of entry and delivery which now is, or hereafter may be, constituted by virtue of the fourth section of the act approved March third, one thousand eight hundred and three, shall, while the same shall remain such, be also a port of entry for ships and vessels and their cargoes, arriving from the Cape of Good Hope and from places beyond the same.
Approved, May 31, 1844.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/28th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 31

Chap. XXXI.—An Act to amend the judiciary act passed the twenty fourth of September, one thousand seven hundred and eighty-nine.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Act of Sept 24, 1789, ch. 20. Appeal to lie from Circuit to Supreme Court of the U. S. in any civil suit arising under revenue laws without regard to the amount. That final judgments in any circuit court of the United States, in any civil action brought by the United States for the enforcement of the revenue laws of the United States, or for the collection of the duties due, or alleged to be due, on merchandise imported therein, may be re-examined, and reversed or affirmed, in the Supreme Court of the United States, upon writ of error, as in other cases, without regard to the sum or value in controversy in such action, at the instance of either party.
Approved, May 31, 1844.
# United States Treaty Series/Volume 1/Observance of neutral territory in Samoa

OBSERVANCE OF NEUTRAL TERRITORY IN SAMOA
* Agreement signed at Apia, Samoa, May 29 and 31, 1879
* Superseded April 12, 1890, by the General Act of June 14, 1889, with respect to those provisions with which the General Act was inconsistent; annulled in entirety February 16, 1900, by convention of December 2, 1899
Department of State files; enclosure to despatch no. 67 of June 4, 1879, from the U.S. consulate at Apia, Samoa
[translation]
We hereby promise to the representatives appointed by the Great Governments in Apia.
1. We will truly observe the neutrality of the territory bounded by the promontory of Tiapepe and bounded by Letogo, and will not collect together within these two places.
The boundary is established as follows: It begins at the promontory of Tiapepe and goes inland from there in Suisega through the Suisega Reservation, continues straight across following the military road; then the boundary goes from there to Suisega and comes over Vaea behind the house of the Roman Catholic missionaries, crossing behind the houses of Tanumamanono where it joins with Lafalafa and crosses to the water of Letogo. It returns to the Falane Plantation and its land and houses, continuing to the cemetery and Rev. Weber's land and houses, a short distance inland from Tanumamanono.
2. If war shall break out then we will not again raise our flag over the neutral territory; then also the representatives appointed to our Government shall go away from Mulinuu; it is prohibited also to the armies [war parties] to assemble or remain on the neutral territory when the war takes place, or to pass over the boundaries.
​3. We will inform the representatives appointed by the Great Governments in Apia of the day when the war commences.
Apia 29 May 1879
We are the representatives appointed, the Chiefs of the Taimua of the Government of Samoa.
* Samoa
* Letuli
* Lavea
* Amoa
Witnesses to signatures and approved by
[The U.S. consul stated that the foregoing was agreed to and signed as a separate document at Apia on May 31 by representatives of Malietoa. The May 31 document concluded as follows: "We are the representatives appointed by Manono and the Tuamasaga: Taupau, Teiatauali sa, Mataafa, Tuiatafa." The U.S. consul noted that the May 31 document was also witnessed and approved by the same U.S., British, and German consuls.]
* ↑ TS 313, post, p. 116.
* ↑ TS 314, post, p. 276.
* ↑ Bracketed material inserted by U.S. consul in his translation.
Footnotes
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Treaty Series/Volume 1/Pacific settlement of international disputes (1907)

This is the official United States government version published in the first volume of the United States Treaty Series (Bevans).
PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES
* Protocol signed at The Hague June 14, 1907
* Entered into force June 14, 1907
* Execution of provisions: A procès-verbal of adhesion was opened at The Hague on June 15, 1907, by the Netherlands Minister of Foreign Affairs to record adherences to the convention of July 29, 1899, for the pacific settlement of international disputes
Department of State files; enclosure to note no. 40 of September 2, 1907, from the Netherlands Legation at Washington
[TRANSLATION]
Protocol
The Powers which have ratified the Convention for the pacific settlement of international disputes, signed at The Hague on July 29, 1899, desiring to enable the States that were not represented at the First Peace Conference and were invited to the Second to adhere to the aforesaid Convention, the undersigned delegates or diplomatic representatives of the above-mentioned Powers, viz.:
Germany, Austria-Hungary, Belgium, Bulgaria, China, Denmark, Spain, the United States of America, the United States of Mexico, France, Great Britain, Greece, Italy, Japan, Luxemburg, Montenegro, Norway, the Netherlands, Persia, Portugal, Roumania, Russia, Servia, Siam, Sweden, Switzerland, and Turkey, duly authorized to that effect, have agreed that there shall be opened by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands, a procès-verbal of adhesions, that shall serve to receive and record the said adhesions, which shall immediately go into effect. In witness whereof the present protocol was drawn up, in a single copy, which shall remain in deposit ​in the archives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands and of which an authenticated copy shall be transmitted to each one of the signatory Powers.
Done at The Hague, June 14, 1907.
* ↑ Concluded pursuant to protocol of Jan. 15, 1902, ante, p. 331.
* ↑ For text, see James Brown Scott, The Hague Conventions and Declarations of 1899 and 1907 (Washington, 1915), p. xxx. The following American republics subsequently adhered to the 1899 convention: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela.
* ↑ TS 392, ante, p. 230.
Footnotes
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Brewer

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
139 U.S. 278
United States v. Brewer
Atty. Gen. Miller, for the United States.
Julius A. Taylor, for defendant.
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Brewster

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Brewster."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Brewster (32 U.S. 164), ( 8 L.Ed. 645 ), ( 7 Pet. 164 )
* United States v. Brewster (408 U.S. 501), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
   * listing incomplete
# United States v. Brewster (32 U.S. 164)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
32 U.S. 164
United States v. Brewster

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Briggs

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Briggs."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Briggs (46 U.S. 208)
* United States v. Briggs (50 U.S. 351)
See also Briggs v. United States.
# United States v. Brig Burdett

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
34 U.S. 682
United States v. Brig Burdett
APPEAL from the circuit court of the United States for the district of Maryland.
The case is fully stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr Butler, attorney-general, and Mr Williams, district attorney of the United States for the district of Maryland, for the appellants.
Mr Meredith and Mr Kennedy, for the claimant of the brig Burdett.
Mr Justice M'Lean delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Briggs (46 U.S. 208)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
46 U.S. 208
United States v. Briggs
THIS case came up from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Michigan, on a certificate of division in opinion.
The circumstances of the case are thus stated by the Chief Justice, as introductory to the opinion of the court.
This case comes before the court upon a certificate of division from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Michigan.
The defendant was indicted under the act of Congress of March 2, 1831, ch. 66 (4 Stat. at L., 472), for unlawfully cutting timber upon certain lands of the United States, called the Wyandotte reserve. He demurred to the indictment upon the following grounds:--
First. Because the offence stated and set forth in the indictment is not an offence under the statute of the United States, punishable cirminally by indictment.
Second. Because, under the statutes of the United States, trespass on the public lands of the United States is, in no case, an offence punishable criminally by indictment; but is either a mere trespass, punishable by action of trespass at common law, or by action of debt in the statute.
Third. For that the said indictment is in other respects informal, insufficient, and defective.
The United States joined in demurrer; and the record states, that the demurrer coming on to be heard, and having been argued by counsel on either side, the opinions of the court were opposed as to the point whether said demurrer should be sustained; and thereupon it was ordered that the cause be certified to this court on the indictment, demurrer, and joinder thereto.
The cause was argued by Mr. Clifford (Attorney-General) and Mr. Norvell, on behalf of the United States.
Mr. Chief Justice TANEY, after stating the case as above, proceeded to deliver the opinion of the court.

## Notes

* ↑ For a further decision in this case, see 9 How., 351.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 1914

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 6285th meeting, on 18 March 2010
The Security Council,
Noting with regret the resignation of Judge Shi Jiuyong, to take effect on 28 May 2010,
Noting further that a vacancy in the International Court of Justice for the remainder of the term of office of Judge Shi Jiuyong will thus occur and must be filled in accordance with the terms of the Statute of the Court,
Noting that, in accordance with Article 14 of the Statute, the date of the election to fill the vacancy shall be fixed by the Security Council,
Decides that the election to fill the vacancy shall take place on 29 June 2010 at a meeting of the Security Council and at a meeting of the General Assembly at its sixty-fourth session.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 1908

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the United Nations Security Council by a unanimous vote at its 6261st meeting on 19 January 2010
The Security Council,
Reaffirming its previous resolutions on Haiti, in particular its resolutions 1892 (2009), 1840 (2008), 1780 (2007), 1743 (2007), 1702 (2006), 1658 (2006), 1608 (2005), 1576 (2004) and 1542 (2004),
Expressing its deepest sympathy and solidarity to all those affected by the devastating earthquake of 12 January in Haiti and to their families,
Further expressing its deepest gratitude for the work of United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH) staff and troops, as well as for the work of the staffs of other United Nations and international organizations in Haiti,
Recognizing the dire circumstances and urgent need for a response,
Welcoming the efforts of Member States to support the Government and people of Haiti and MINUSTAH,
1.Endorses the recommendation made by the Secretary-General to increase the overall force levels of MINUSTAH to support the immediate recovery, reconstruction and stability efforts;
2.Decides, therefore, that MINUSTAH will consist of a military component of up to 8,940 troops of all ranks and of a police component of up to 3,711 police and that it will keep the new levels of troops and police in MINUSTAH under review as necessary;
3.Decides to remain seized of the matter
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 1913

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
The Security Council,
Recalling its resolutions and the statements of its President concerning Chad, the Central African Republic and the subregion, including resolution 1769 (2007), 1778 (2007), 1834 (2008) and resolution 1861 (2009),
Considering the note verbale of the government of Chad of 19 January 2010, its letter of 3 March 2010 (S/2010/115), and the letter of the Secretary-General of 11 March 2010, indicating that discussions on the future of the United Nations Mission in the Central African Republic and Chad (MINURCAT) are still ongoing,
Determining that the situation in the region continues to constitutea threat to international peace and security,
1. Decides to extend until 15 May 2010 the mandate of MINURCAT as set out in resolution 1861 (2009);
2. Decides to remain actively seized of the matter.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Code/Title 28/Appendix

From from the U.S. House of Representatives. See Cornell's LII for additional info.
Title 28—Judiciary and Judicial Procedure Appendix
* Judicial Personnel Financial Disclosure Requirements (Repealed)
* Development of Mechanisms for Resolving Minor Disputes (Omitted)
* Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure
* Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
* Federal Rules of Evidence
# United States Code/Title 26/Chapter 1/Subchapter N/Part I

from the Cornell Law School
Title 26—Internal Revenue Code Subtitle A—Income Taxes Chapter 1—Normal Taxes and Surtaxes Subchapter N—Tax Based on Income from Sources Within or Without the United States Part I—Source rules and other general rules relating to foreign income
* Section 861—Income from sources within the United States
* Section 862—Income from sources without the United States
* Section 863—Special rules for determining source
* Section 864—Definitions and special rules
* Section 865—Source rules for personal property sales

## Amendments
### 1988

Pub. L. 100-647, title I, Secs. 1012(e)(3)(B), (h)(2)(C), 1018(u)(37), Nov. 11, 1988, 102 Stat. 3500, 3502, 3592, substituted "SOURCE RULES AND OTHER GENERAL RULES RELATING TO FOREIGN INCOME" for "DETERMINATION OF SOURCES OF INCOME" as part I heading, substituted "Special rules for determining source" for "Items not specified in section 861 or 862" in item 863, and added item 865.

### 1986

Pub. L. 99-514, title XII, Sec. 1215(b)(2), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2545, substituted "Definitions and special rules" for "Definitions" in item 864.