OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume IV/Incarnation of the Word/On the Incarnation of the Word/Chapter 33

§33. Unbelief of Jews and scoffing of Greeks. The former confounded by their own Scriptures. Prophecies of His coming as God and as Man.
These things being so, and the Resurrection of His body and the victory gained over death by the Saviour being clearly proved, come now let us put to rebuke both the disbelief of the Jews and the scoffing of the Gentiles. 2. For these, perhaps, are the points where Jews express incredulity, while Gentiles laugh, finding fault with the unseemliness of the Cross, and of the Word of God becoming man. But our argument shall not delay to grapple with both especially as the proofs at our command against them are clear as day. 3. For Jews in their incredulity may be refuted from the Scriptures, which even themselves read; for this text and that, and, in a word, the whole inspired Scripture, cries aloud concerning these things, as even its express words abundantly shew. For prophets proclaimed beforehand concerning the wonder of the Virgin and the birth from her, saying: “Lo, the Virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a Son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which is, being interpreted, God with us.” 4. But Moses, the truly great, and whom they believe to speak truth, with reference to the Saviour’s becoming man, having estimated what was said as important, and assured of its truth, set it down in these words: “There shall rise a star out of Jacob, and a man out of Israel, and he shall break in pieces the captains of Moab.” And again: “How lovely are thy habitations O Jacob, thy tabernacles O Israel, as shadowing gardens, and as parks by the rivers, and as tabernacles which the Lord hath fixed, as cedars by the waters. A man shall come forth out of his seed, and shall be Lord over many peoples.” And again, Esaias: “Before the Child know how to call father or mother, he shall take the power of Damascus and the spoils of Samaria before the king of Assyria.” 5. That a man, then, shall appear is foretold in those words. But that He that is to come is Lord of all, they predict once more as follows: “Behold the Lord sitteth upon a light cloud, and shall come into Egypt, and the graven images of Egypt shall be shaken.” For from thence also it is that the Father calls Him back, saying: “I called My Son out of Egypt.”

## Footnotes

* ↑ Matt. i. 23; Isa. vii. 14.
* ↑ Num. xxiv. 5–17.
* ↑ Isa. viii. 4.
* ↑ Isa. xix. 1.
* ↑ Hos. xi. 1.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume IV/Incarnation of the Word/On the Incarnation of the Word/Chapter 32

§32. But who is to see Him risen, so as to believe? Nay, God is ever invisible and known by His works only: and here the works cry out in proof. If you do not believe, look at those who do, and perceive the Godhead of Christ. The demons see this, though men be blind. Summary of the argument so far.
But if, because He is not seen, His having risen at all is disbelieved, it is high time for those who refuse belief to deny the very course of Nature. For it is God’s peculiar property at once to be invisible and yet to be known from His works, as has been already stated above. 2. If, then, the works are not there, they do well to disbelieve what does not appear. But if the works cry aloud and shew it clearly, why do they choose to deny the life so manifestly due to the Resurrection? For even if they be maimed in their intelligence, yet even with the external senses men may see the unimpeachable power and Godhead of Christ. 3. For even a blind man, if he see not the sun, yet if he but take hold of the warmth the sun gives out, knows that there is a sun above the earth. Thus let our opponents also, even if they believe not as yet, being still blind to the truth, yet at least knowing His power by others who believe, not deny the Godhead of Christ and the Resurrection accomplished by Him. 4. For it is plain that if Christ be dead, He could not be expelling demons and spoiling idols; for a dead man the spirits would not have obeyed. But if they be manifestly expelled by the naming of His name, it must be evident that He is not dead; especially as spirits, seeing even what is unseen by men, could tell if Christ were dead and refuse Him any obedience at all. 5. But as it is, what irreligious men believe not, the spirits see—that He is God,—and hence they fly and fall at His feet, saying just what they uttered when He was in the body: “We know Thee Who Thou art, the Holy One of God;” and, “Ah, what have we to do with Thee, Thou Son of God? I pray Thee, torment me not.” 6. As then demons confess Him, and His works bear Him witness day by day, it must be evident, and let none brazen it out against the truth, both that the Saviour raised His own body, and that He is the true Son of God, being from Him, as from His Father, His own Word, and Wisdom, and Power, Who in ages later took a body for the salvation of all, and taught the world concerning the Father, and brought death to nought, and bestowed incorruption upon all by the promise of the Resurrection, having raised His own body as a first-fruits of this, and having displayed it by the sign of the Cross as a monument of victory over death and its corruption.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Cf. Luc. iv. 34, and Marc. v. 7.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume IV/Incarnation of the Word/On the Incarnation of the Word/Chapter 34

§34. Prophecies of His passion and death in all its circumstances.
Nor is even His death passed over in silence: on the contrary, it is referred to in the divine Scriptures, even exceeding clearly. For to the end that none should err for want of instruction in the actual events, they feared not to mention even the cause of His death,—that He suffers it not for His own sake, but for the immortality and salvation of all, and the counsels of the Jews against Him and the indignities offered Him at their hands. 2. They say then: “A man in stripes, and knowing how to bear weakness, for his face is turned away: he was dishonoured and held in no account. He beareth our sins, and is in pain on our account; and we reckoned him to be in labour, and in stripes, and in ill-usage; but he was wounded for our sins, and made weak for our wickedness. The chastisement of our peace was upon him, and by his stripes we were healed.” O marvel at the loving-kindness of the Word, that for our sakes He is dishonoured, that we may be brought to honour. “For all we,” it says, “like sheep were gone astray; man had erred in his way; and the Lord delivered him for our sins; and he openeth not his mouth, because he hath been evilly entreated. As a sheep was he brought to the slaughter, and as a lamb dumb before his shearer, so openeth he not his mouth: in his abasement his judgment was taken away.” 3. Then lest any should from His suffering conceive Him to be a common man, Holy Writ anticipates the surmises of man, and declares the power (which worked) for Him, and the difference of His nature compared with ourselves, saying: “But who shall declare his generation? For his life is taken away from the earth. From the wickedness of the people was he brought to death. And I will give the wicked instead of his burial, and the rich instead of his death; for he did no wickedness, neither was guile found in his mouth. And the Lord will cleanse him from his stripes.”

## Footnotes

* ↑ Isa. liii. 3, sqq.
* ↑ Or, “exalted.”
* ↑ τὴν ὑπὲρ αὐτου δύναμιν. The Ben. version simplifies this difficult expression by ignoring the ὑπερ. Mr. E. N. Bennett has suggested to me that the true reading may be ὑπερά& 203·λον for ὑπὲρ αὐτοῦ (ἄϋλος supra 8. 1, ὑπεραὺλως in Philo). I would add the suggestion that αὐτοῦ stood after ὑπεράυλον, and that the similarity of the five letters in ms. caused the second word to be dropped out. ‘His exceeding immaterial power’ would be the resulting sense. (See Class. Review, 1890, No. iv. p. 182.)
* ↑ Or, “exalted.”
# Oregon Historical Quarterly/Volume 10

THE QUARTERLY
OF THE
Oregon Historical Society.
[The Quarterly disavows responsibility for the positions taken by contributors to its pages.]
[The Quarterly disavows responsibility for the positions taken by contributors to its pages.]
* The Discovery and Exploration of the Fraser River (address at OHS annual meeting). by Frederick V. Holman (OHS pres.)
* Father Wilbur and His Work. by Wm. D. Fenton
* Land Tenure in Oregon: Including the Topography, Disposition of Public Lands, Landlordism, Mortgages, Farm Output, and Practical Workings of Tenant Farming of the State, Together with Tables and Copies of Land Leases. by Lon. L. Swift
[The Quarterly disavows responsibility for the positions taken by contributors to its pages.]
* De Smet in the Oregon Country. Edwin V. O'Hara
* The Financial History of the State of Oregon. F. G. Young
* Journal of John Work: April 30th to May 31st, 1830. edited by T. C. Elliott
* Official Report of John Brown's Raid upon Harper's Ferry, Virginia, October 17-18, 1859. A Hudson's Bay Company Marriage Certificate
* editorial notes by T. C. Elliott
[The Quarterly disavows responsibility for the positions taken by contributors to Its pages.]
* The Peter Skene Ogden Journals: Snake Expedition, 1825-26. by editorial notes by T. C. Elliott
* The Financial History of the State of Oregon: Oregon's Public Domain. by F. G. Young
* Dedication of the McLoughlin Home. by Frederick V. Holman (address)
* "Documents"

## Index

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Oregon Historical Quarterly/Volume 1/Review: Missionary History of the Pacific Northwest

    Missionary History of the Pacific Northwest. By H. K. Hines, D. D. (Portland: H. K. Hines, San Francisco: J. D. Hammond, 1899. Pp. 510.)
As the sub-title indicates, this is rather the "Story of Jason Lee" than a missionary history of the Pacific Northwest. There would have been no impropriety in giving it the title of "Jason Lee and the Methodist Missionary Effort in the Pacific Northwest." The title is positively misleading as it stands, for forty pages only are devoted to an account of the work of the missionaries under the "American Board," while some four hundred and fifty are taken up with the story of the Methodist Missions. The Methodist denomination was first in this field with wisely chosen representatives. It ​sustained and reinforced its movement to christianize the Indians of Oregon most munificently, considering the conditions of the times. As a memorial of these efforts conceived with such grand and consecrated spirit, nothing would have been more fitting than a volume by Doctor Hines.
No one could have been so unfair as to demand of Doctor Hines a cold and critical account of these missionaries and their work. A panegyric on Jason Lee and his colaborers was becoming from him. He was the man prepared through life-long schooling and natural inclination to do this, and Jason Lee's work deserved it. But for the title and an invidious comparison that crops out all too frequently, Doctor Hines has done in this book just what God had prepared him to do.
It is a pity that a work of so high general character, the best product of such fine literary ability as Doctor Hines possesses, could not have been one of some famous series by a strong publishing house of the East that would have pushed it into the markets of the world.
The fact that the critical historian will take issue with the conclusions of this book almost from the beginning constitutes no disparagement of the real worth of the author's work. It was a labor of love for a character and for a denomination. This, however, may be said: The Methodist missionary project in the Pacific Northwest was, soon after its inception, at all but one or two points, not distinctively a missionary station at all. But it was a colony with a strong secular spirit and exercised a most salutary influence upon the affairs of the Oregon community. This fact the work of Doctor Hines unwittingly proves.
# Occult Japan/front matter

* Books by Percival Lowell.
* THE SOLAR SYSTEM. 12mo, $1.25, net. Postage 8 cents.
* MARS. With colored Frontispiece, maps, and 22 other Illustrations. 8vo, gilt top, $2.50.
* THE SOUL OF THE FAR EAST. 16mo, gilt top, $1.25.
* CHOSON: THE LAND OF THE MORNING CALM. A Sketch of Korea. Illustrated. 4to, gilt top, $5.00.
* Library Edition. 8vo, gilt top, $3.00.
* NOTO: AN UNEXPLORED CORNER OF JAPAN. 16mo, gilt top, $1.25.
* OCCULT JAPAN: THE WAY OF THE GODS. Illustrated. Crown 8vo, gilt top, $1.75.
* HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY
* Boston and New York
# Oliver Twist (1838)

In 1838, Dickens published two different editions of Oliver Twist. This is the Boz issue.
Layout 2
* Volume 1—Oliver's reception by Fagin and the boys
* Volume 2—The Burglary
* Volume 3—The Last Chance
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Oliver Twist

After its initial serialization in Bentley's Miscellany in 1837, Charles Dickens heavily revised the text for a new edition in 1846. This 1846 revision forms the basis of the Clarendon Dickens.

## Editions that Charles Dickens contributed to

* "Oliver Twist; or, the Parish Boy's Progress", serialized in Bentley's Miscellaney, Vol. 1-5 (1837-1839)
* Oliver Twist (Boz Issue) (transcription volumes: 1, 2, 3)
* Oliver Twist (Charles Dickens' Issue) (transcription volumes: 1, 2, 3) (Volume 3 has two different printings. This is the variant published after 16 Nov. 1838 with a different fireside plate and several small textual emendations.)
* Oliver Twist (1839 Second Edition) (transcription volumes: 1, 2, 3)
* Oliver Twist (1839 New Edition) 1839.
* Oliver Twist (1840 Edition) Oliver Twist; or, the parish boy's progress. By "Boz." . . . 1840.
* Oliver Twist (Third Edition) 1839.
* Oliver Twist (1841 Serialization)
* Oliver Twist (New Edition) With twenty-four illustrations on steel, by George Cruikshank. A new edition, revised and corrected. London: Published for the author, by Bradbury & Evans, Whitefriars. MDCCCXLVI.
* Oliver Twist (Cheap Edition) With a frontispiece by George Cruikshank. London: Chapman and Hall, 186, Strand. MDCCCL.
* Oliver Twist (Library Edition) London: Chapman and Hall, 193, Piccadilly; and Bradbury and Evans, 11, Bouverie Street. 1858.
* Oliver Twist (Charles Dickens Edition) (transcription project)

## Film adaptations

* Oliver Twist (1909), an American film directed by James Stuart Blackton
* Oliver Twist (1922), an American film directed by Sol Lesser
* Oliver Twist (1933), an American film directed by William J. Cowen
# Oliver Twist (1838)/Volume 1

Layout 2
OLIVER TWIST.
VOL. I.
NEW WORK BY "BOZ."
BARNABY RUDGE:
BY "BOZ."
Which will be published forthwith in Bentley's Miscellany.
Oliver's reception by Fagin and the boys.
OLIVER TWIST;
OR, THE
PARISH BOY'S PROGRESS.
BY "BOZ."
IN THREE VOLUMES.
VOL. I.
LONDON:
RICHARD BENTLEY, NEW BURLINGTON STREET.
1838.
LONDON: PRINTED BY SAMUEL BENTLEY, Dorset Street, Fleet Street.
* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
* Chapter VII
* Chapter VIII
* Chapter IX
* Chapter X
* Chapter XI
* Chapter XII
* Chapter XIII
* Chapter XIV
* Chapter XV
* Chapter XVI
* Chapter XVII
* Chapter XVIII
* Chapter XIX
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XII/Leo the Great/Letters/Letter 114

Letter CXIV.
To the Bishops Assembled in Synod at Chalcedon.
(In answer to their Letter (XCVIII.), approving of their acts in the general so long as nothing is contrary to the canons of Nicæa.)
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XII/Leo the Great/Letters/Letter 107

Letter CVII.
To Julian, Bishop of Cos.
(Expostulating with him for putting personal considerations before the good of the Church in the matter of the precedence of the See of Constantinople.)
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XII/Leo the Great/Letters/Letter 112

Letter CXII.
To Pulcheria Augusta.
(On the same subject more briefly.)
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XII/Leo the Great/Letters/Letter 11

Letter XI.
An Ordinance of Valentinianus III.
(Confirming Leo’s sentence upon Hilary.)
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XII/Leo the Great/Letters/Letter 110

Letter CX.
From Marcian Augustus.
(Expressing surprise that Leo has not by now confirmed the acts of the Synod, and asking for a speedy confirmation.)
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XII/Leo the Great/Letters/Letter 111

Letter CXI.
To Marcian Augustus.
(About Anatolius’ mistake in deposing Actions from the office of archdeacon and putting in Andrew instead.)
# Ohio John Lloyd v. Dollison

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
194 U.S. 445
Ohio John Lloyd v. Dollison
Argued: April 28, 29, 1904. --- Decided: May 16, 1904
The plaintiff in error was committed to custody upon a warrant for violating the law of Ohio called the 'Beal Local Option Law.' He petitioned in habeas corpus for his discharge to one of the judges of the state, having jurisdiction. On hearing he was remitted to curstody, and the judgment was affirmed by the supreme court of the state. This writ of error was then sued out. The question involved is the constitutionality of the law.
The facts constituting the violation of the law were alleged to be the unlawful selling and furnishing to one E. L. Scott, a resident of the city of Cambridge, six pints of beer, and with keeping a place where intoxicating liquors are kept for sale, given away, and furnished for beverage purposes. The sale was not within any of the exceptions of the law.
In the petition for habeas corpus it was alleged that plaintiff in error was arrested by a constable of the township of Cambridge, upon a warrant issued by a justice of the peace in and for the township of Center, Guernsey county, Ohio, which township is outside of the geographical boundaries of the city of Cambridge, where the violation of the law was claimed to have occurred.
That, by virtue of the arrest, plaintiff in error was committed to jail in the county of Guernsey, and there imprisoned by J. B. Dollison, the sheriff of the county.
Messrs. Frank S. Monnett, D. F. Pugh, and R. M. Nevin for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. W. B. Wheeler and A. V. Taylor for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McKenna, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ohio Law Journal

The Ohio Law Journal is a periodical, published in six volumes from 1880 to 1884. In 1885 it and the Weekly Law Bulletin merged to become the Weekly Law Bulletin and Ohio Law Journal.
* Volume 1
* Volume 2 (1882) External scan
* Volume 3 (1883) External scan
* Volume 4 (1884) External scan
* Volume 5 (1884) External scan
* Volume 6 (1884)
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ohio Cent Company v. Central Trust Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
133 U.S. 83
Ohio Cent Company v. Central Trust Company
[Statement of Case from pages 83-85 intentionally omitted]
H. L. Terrell, Ashbell Green, and Thomas Thacher, for appellant.
Stevenson Burke and T. E. Stillman, for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 87-89 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ohio Constitution of 1851

* related portals: Ohio.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Preamble

We, the people of the State of Ohio, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, to secure its blessings and promote our common welfare, do establish this Constitution.

## Article I: Bill of Rights
### Section 1: Inalienable Rights

All men are, by nature, free and independent, and have certain inalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and seeking and obtaining happiness and safety.

### Section 2: Right to Alter, Reform, or Abolish Government, and Repeal Special Privileges

All political Power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for their equal protection and benefit, and they have the right to alter, reform, or abolish the same whenever they may deem it necessary; and no special privileges or immunities shall ever be granted, that may not be altered, revoked, or repealed by the General Assembly.

### Section 3: Right to Assemble

The people have the right to assemble together, in a peaceable manner, to consult for the common good; to instruct their representatives; and to petition the General Assembly for the redress of grievances.

### Section 4: Bearing Arms; Standing Armies; Military Power

The people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security; but standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, and shall not be kept up; and the military shall be in strict subordination to civil power.

### Section 5: Trial by Jury

The right of trial by jury shall be inviolate, except that, in civil cases, laws may be passed to authorize rendering of a verdict by the concurrence of not less than three-fourths of the jury. lmk-1912

### Section 6: Slavery and Involuntary Servitude

There shall be no slavery in this state; nor involuntary servitude, unless for the punishment of crime.
# On the Lighthouse at Antibes

* "On the Lighthouse at Antibes" in The Ascent of Man (1889)
* "On the Lighthouse at Antibes" in Poetical works of Mathilde Blind (1900)
# Omaha Council Bluffs Street Railway Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Omaha Council Bluffs Street Railway Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Omaha Council Bluffs Street Railway Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission (222 U.S. 582)
* Omaha Council Bluffs Street Railway Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission (230 U.S. 324)