OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Latin for beginners (1911)/Part III/Lesson LXXIII

Layout 2
LESSON LXXIII
VOCABULARY REVIEW • THE IRREGULAR VERB FERŌ THE DATIVE WITH COMPOUNDS
423. Review the word lists in §§ 513, 514.
424. Learn the principal parts and conjugation of the verb ferō, bear (§ 498).
425. The dative is the case of the indirect object. Many intransitive verbs take an indirect object and are therefore used with the dative (cf. § 153). Transitive verbs take a direct object in the accusative; but sometimes they have an indirect object or dative as well. The whole question, then, as to whether or not a verb takes the dative, defends upon its capacity for governing an indirect object. A number of verbs, some transitive and some intransitive, which in their simple form would not take an indirect object, when compounded with certain prepositions, have a meaning which calls for an indirect object. Observe the following sentences:
* Haec rēs exercituī magnam calamitātem attulit, this circumstance brought great disaster to the army.
* Germānī Gallīs bellum īnferunt, the Germans make war upon the Gauls.
* Hae cōpiae proeliō nōn intererant, these troops did not take part in the battle.
* Equitēs fugientibus hostibus occurrunt, the horsemen meet the fleeing enemy.
* Galba cōpiīs fīlium praefēcit, Galba put his son in command of the troops.
426. Rule. Dative with Compounds. Some verbs compounded with ad, ante, con, dē, in, inter, ob, post, prae, prō, sub, super, admit the dative of the indirect object. Transitive compounds may take both an accusative and a dative.
Note 1. Among such verbs are
427.
IDIOMS
428.
EXERCISES
I.
* Fer, ferent, ut ferant, ferunt.
* Ferte, ut ferrent, tulisse, tulerant.
* Tulimus, ferēns, lātus esse, ferre.
* Cum nāvigia insulae adpropinquārent, barbarī terrōre commōtī pedem referre cōnātī sunt.
* Gallī molestē ferēbant Rōmānōs agrōs vastāre.
* Caesar sociīs imperāvit nē fīnitimis suīs bellum īnferrent.
* Explorātōrēs, qui Caesarī occurrērunt, dīxērunt exercitum hostium vulneribus dēfessum sēsē in alium locum contulisse.
* Hostes sciēbant Rōmānōs frūmentō egēre et hanc rem Caesarī summum perīculum adlātūram esse.
* Impedīmentīs in ūnum locum conlātis, aliquī mīlitum flūmen quod nōn longē ​aberat trānsiērunt.
* Hōs rēx hortātus est ut ōrāculum adīrent et rēs audītās ad sē referrent.
* Quem imperātor illī legiōnī praefēcit? Pūblius illī legiōnī pracerat.
* Cum esset Caesar in citeriōre Galliā, crēbrī ad eum rūmōrēs adferēbantur litterīsque quoque certior fīēbat Gallōs obsidēs inter sē dare.
II.
* The Gauls will make war upon Cæsar’s allies.
* We heard that the Gauls would make war upon Cæsar’s allies.
* Publius did not take part in that battle.
* We have been informed that Publius did not take part in that battle.
* The man who was in command of the cavalry was wounded and began to retreat.
* Cæsar did not place you in command of the cohort to bring disaster upon the army.
* ↑ But the accusative with ad or in is used with some of these, when the idea of motion to or against is strong.
* ↑ Observe that when adferō denotes motion to, it is not followed by the dative; cf. footnote, p. 182.
* ↑ Not the infinitive. (Cf. § 352.)
References
# Journal of the Optical Society of America/Volume 6

    Issue 1 1
    Issue 2
    Issue 3
    Issue 4
    Issue 5
    Issue 6 527
    Issue 7 663
    Issue 8
    Issue 9
    Issue 10
    Issue 11
    Issue 12
# Journal of the Polynesian Society

* Volume 1
* Volume 2
* Volume 3
* Volume 4
* Volume 5
* Volume 6
* Volume 7
* Volume 8
* Volume 9
* Volume 10
* Volume 11
* Volume 12
* Volume 13
* Volume 14
* Volume 15
* Volume 17
* Volume 20
* Volume 21
* Volume 26
* Volume 27
* Volume 28
* Volume 29
* Volume 30
This work was published before January 1, 1929 and is anonymous or pseudonymous due to unknown authorship. It is in the public domain in the United States as well as countries and areas where the copyright terms of anonymous or pseudonymous works are 95 years or less since publication.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lauf v. E. G. Shinner & Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
303 U.S. 323
Lauf v. E. G. Shinner & Company
Argued: Jan. 12, 1938. --- Decided: Feb 28, 1938
[Syllabus from pages 323-325 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. A. W. Richter and Morris Fromkin, both of Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioners.
Mr. Walter L. Gold, of Milwaukee, Wis., for respondent.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS, delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Laugh and Be Fat, the Golden Dreamer, or, Dreams Interpreted

Laugh and be Fat!!!
The Golden Dreamer,
OR
DREAMS INTERPRETED:
ALSO
Amorous Dreams in Verse.
TO WHICH IS ADDED,
A TREATISE ON MOLES.
WITH THEIR SIGNIFICATIONS, &c.
PRINTED
For the flying Stationers.——1827.
* The Golden Dreamer, or Dreams Interpreted
* Amorous Dreams in Verse
* A Treatise on Moles with their Significations
Layout 2
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Laugh and Be Fat, the Golden Dreamer, or, Dreams Interpreted/Chapter 2

AMOROUS DREAMS in VERSE.
To dream of walking in a field, Where new blown roses odiours yield, If any of them you do pluck, It shews in love most happy luck, And that your lass so kind shall prove To let you gather sweets of love.
Dreams full of horror and confusion, Ending merrily in conlusion, Show storms of love are ever blown And after sorrow, joy shall come.
To dream of mountains, hiils or rocks. Does signify flouts, scoffs and mocks, Their pains in passing over ahow, That she whom you love, loves not you.
To dream of sitting by the fire, When it is late, doth shew desire,
But if you sit till the fire's out, Your love will prove false out of doubt.
To dream of rivers, or of water, Doth signify much weeping after, But dreaming of being drowned I tell ye, Bids maids beware of a great belly.
If maids of sweeming milk-bowls dream, It does denote some pleasant theme; But if they dream of shifting smoke, Let them look on their maiden lock.
To dream of being in a boat, Does show that maiden's fancies float; And whether sink or swim they do; To try love's sport they still shall show.
To dream of birds-nests signifies, In maiden's ripe virginities: But if the birds away be flown, it shews her maidenhead is gone.
To dream of brewing and of baking, Doth signify a match is making Between a maiden and some other, Both by her father and her mother.
To dream of blust'ring storms of wind, Does shew inconstancy of mind; But if you dream of elves and fairies, Beware of whores and night vagaries.
To dream of seeing strange apparitions, As devils, hobgoblins, and such visions, Does shew thy love, or thy sweetheart, Hath a fair face but devil's heart.
Dreams of sack-possets and sweet meat, Or drinking wine with pleasure great. And all dreams pleasant in condition, Shews sports of love, and love's fruition.
Dreams of wandering over plains, Walking in cross-ways and lanes, And being in thick woods quite lost, Declare that lovers shall be crost.
Dreams of lions, bears, bulls, bees, Nests of wasps or hornets; these Are emblems whereby are exprest Discord with those whom you love best.
Dreams of rivers, ships and horses, Of snow and frost, and of dead corpses, Are signs by which it may be read, Your sweetheart's love is cold or dead.
Who dream of deer, of hounds, of chases Or being at once in many places: Passions of love shall every where, Haunt their poor hearts as hounds do deer
Dreams of joy and pleasant jests, Dancing, merriment, and feasts, Or any dream of recreation, Sinifies love's delication.
Dreams of air serene and gay. And the fields dsessed all like May; But quickly clouded and o er cast, With many a bitter northern blast, Shews nuptial pleasures fade apace, And joys the sorrow soon give place And that 'twixt poverty and strife, You'll have but an unpleasant life.
Layout 2
# Laugh and be Merry

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Laugh and be merry, remember, better the world with a song, Better the world with a blow in the teeth of a wrong. Laugh, for the time is brief, a thread the length of a span. Laugh and be proud to belong to the old proud pageant of man.
Laugh and be merry: remember, in olden time. God made Heaven and Earth for joy He took in a rhyme, Made them, and filled them full with the strong red wine of His mirth The splendid joy of the stars: the joy of the earth.
So we must laugh and drink from the deep blue cup of the sky, Join the jubilant song of the great stars sweeping by, Laugh, and battle, and work, and drink of the wine outpoured In the dear green earth, the sign of the joy of the Lord.
Laugh and be merry together, like brothers akin, Guesting awhile in the rooms of a beautiful inn, Glad till the dancing stops, and the lilt of the music ends. Laugh till the game is played; and be you merry, my friends.  The Edinburgh Express.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Laughing Song

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Laughing Song."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "The Laughing Song", anonymous
* "Laughing Song" by William Blake
# Laughing Song (Blake)

This poem was originally published in the collection Songs of Innocence (1789).
# Literary Taste: How to Form It

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
Literary Taste: How to Form it is a long essay by Arnold Bennett, first published in 1909, with a revised edition by his friend Frank Swinnerton appearing in 1937. It includes a long list of recommended books, every item individually costed. Both the essay and the list were very influential, although Bennett's decision to include only books originally written in English (along with a handful of Latin works) makes it extremely insular compared with most other attempts at compiling a literary canon.

### Contents

* Chapter I: The aim
* Chapter II: Your particular case
* Chapter III: Why a classic is a classic
* Chapter IV: Where to begin
* Chapter V: How to read a classic
* Chapter VI: The question of style
* Chapter VII: Wrestling with an author
* Chapter VIII: System in reading
* Chapter IX: Verse
* Chapter X: Broad counsels
* Chapter XI: An English library: Period I
* Chapter XII: An English library: Period II
* Chapter XIII: An English library: Period III
* Chapter XIV: Mental stocktaking
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1931, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 92 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Legends of Old Testament Characters/Chapter 34

XXXIV.
THE JUDGES.
IF Joshua, the first of the Judges, has, to a great extent, escaped the hands of legend manufacturers, the same may be said of his successors, Phinehas, Othniel, Ehud, Deborah and Barak, Gibeon, Abimelech, Tola, Jair, Jephthah, Ibzan, Elon, and Abdon. Even Samson has not been surrounded by such a multitude of traditions as might have been expected.
The Mussulmans have little to say of him, and the Jewish legends are not numerous.
The Rabbi Samuel, son of Nahaman, said that Samson once took two mountains, one in each hand, and knocked them together, as a man will strike together two pebbles. The Rabbi Jehuda said that when the Spirit of the Lord rested on him, he strode in one stride from Zorah to Eshtaol. The Rabbi Nahaman added that his hair stood up, and one hair tinkled ​against another, so that the sound could be heard, like that of bells, from Zorah to Eshtaol.
Abulfaraj says that Phinehas, the son of Eleazer, the son of Aaron, after the death of Joshua, was commanded by an angel to put the manna, the rod, the tables of the covenant, and the five books of Moses in a brazen urn, seal it with lead, and conceal it in a cave, as the Israelites were too wicked to be entrusted with such a treasure.
* ↑ Eisenmenger, i. p. 395.
* ↑ Hist. Dynast. p. 24.
# Kendall v. United States (107 U.S. 123)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
107 U.S. 123
Kendall v. United States
T. W. Bartley, for appellant.
Sol. Gen. Phillips, for appellees.
HARLAN, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kendall v. United States (37 U.S. 524)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
37 U.S. 524
Kendall v. United States
[Syllabus from pages 524-527 intentionally omitted]
IN error to the circuit court of the United States in the District of Columbia, for the county of Washington.
On the twenty-sixty day of May, 1837, William B. Stokes, Richard C. Stockton, Lucius W. Stockton, and Daniel Moore, presented a petition to the circuit court of the District of Columbia, for the county of Washington, stating, that under contracts duly and legally made by them with the late William T. Barry, then postmaster general of the United States, and duly authorized by law, they were entitled to certain credits and allowances on their contracts for the transportation of the mail of the United States; that the credits and allowances were made and given to them on their contracts, and amounts of money actually paid on such accounts; that some time in 1835, William T. Barry resigned his situation as postmaster general, and Amos Kendall was appointed to the office; that after he had entered on the duties of his office, he undertook to re-examine the contracts entered into by his predecessor, and the credits and allowances made by him; and ordered and directed the allowances and credits to be withdrawn, and the petitioners recharged with divers payments they had received.
The petitioners state that they were dissatisfied with these proceedings of Amos Kendall, as postmaster general; and, believing he had exceeded his authority, and being unable to adjust their differences with him, they addressed a memorial to the congress of the United States. A copy of the memorial was annexed to the petition.
The memorial stated, at large, all the circumstances which the petitioners considered as affecting their case; the proceedings of the postmaster general in the matter; and the heavy grievances done to the memorialists by the course adopted by the postmaster general. They ask such proceedings on the part of congress as its wisdom and justice may direct.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kendall v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Kendall v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Kendall v. United States (37 U.S. 524)
* Kendall v. United States (74 U.S. 113)
* Kendall v. United States (107 U.S. 123)
# Kendall v. Winsor

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
62 U.S. 322
Kendall v. Winsor
THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Rhode Island.
The facts in the case, the instructions asked for and refused upon the trial in the Circuit Court, and also those given to the jury by the court, are all set forth in the opinion of the court. Under these instructions, the jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, and assessed his damages in the sum of two thousand dollars.
It was argued by Mr. Jenckes for the plaintiffs in error, and by Mr. Keller for the defendant.
The points made by the counsel on each side can be readily inferred from a perusal of the instructions asked for on behalf of the defendants in the Circuit Court, and of those given, which latter were sustained in the argument in this court. All of these instructions are set forth in the following opinion.
Mr. Justice DANIEL delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Letty's Globe

* "Letty's Globe" in Littell's Living Age, 138 (1785)
* "Letty's Globe", in Poems That Every Child Should Know (1904), edited by Mary Elizabeth Burt
* "Letty's Globe", in Highways and Byways in Lincolnshire (1907), by Willingham Franklin Rawnsley
* "Letty's Globe", in Oxford Book of English Verse 1250-1900 (1931), edited by Arthur Quiller-Couch
* "Letty's Globe", in Oxford Book of English Verse 1250-1918 (1940), edited by Arthur Quiller-Couch
# Lev v. United States (360 U.S. 470)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
360 U.S. 470
Lev v. United States
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice STEWAT t ook no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lev v. United States (358 U.S. 903)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
358 U.S. 903
Lev v. United States
Raymond WOOL, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.
No. 436.
Marvin RUBIN, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.
No. 437. Supreme Court of the United States
December 8, 1958
Page 903-continued.
In No. 435 petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted limited to questions 5, 6, and 7 presented by the petition for the writ which read as follows:
'5. Is it proper for a reviewing court to make an examination in camera of a sealed summary of a witness's prior statement to a government investigator furnished it by the prosecutor and of ex parte affidavits pertaining to the summary in order to determine whether the summary is discoverable under the provisions of Title 18 U.S.C., Section 3500, when no claim is made that it contained irrelevant or extraneous matter?
'6. Are not summaries and reports of prior statements made by witnesses to a government investigator available to the defendant under the provisions of Title 18 U.S.C., Section 3500?
'7. Does Title 18 U.S.C. Section 3500, provide the sole procedure by which such summaries and reports are to be made available to defendants?'
In No. 436 petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted limited to question 2 presented by the petition for the writ which reads as follows:
'2. Whether the rights of the petitioner were substantially prejudiced when the trial court denied the motion of the defendants to direct the Government to produce a statement which a witness for the Government had previously given to government agents, in direct violation of this Court's decision in Jencks v. U.S., 353 U.S. 657, 77 S.Ct. 1007, 1 L.Ed.2d 1103.'
In No. 437 petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted.
The cases are consolidated and a total of three hours allowed for oral argument.
Mr. Justice STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lev v. United States (358 U.S. 903)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
358 U.S. 903
Lev v. United States
Mr. Anthony Bradley Eben, for petitioner Lev.
Mr. Albert H. Treiman, for petitioner Wool.
Mr. Isidor Enselman, for petitioner Rubin.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper, for the United States.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lev v. United States (360 U.S. 470)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
360 U.S. 470
Lev v. United States
Marvin RUBIN
v.
UNITED STATES. Supreme Court of the United States
June 22, 1959
Rehearing Denied Oct. 12, 1959.
See 80 S.Ct. 41.
Mr. Anthony Bradley Eben, for petitioner Lev.
Mr. Albert H. Treiman, for petitioner Wool.
Mr. John T. Sullivan (Mr. Isidor Enselman, on the brief), for petitioner Rubin.
Mr. Oscar H. Davis (Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg, Julia P. Cooper, and Mr. Jerome M. Feit, on the brief), for the United States.
On writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lev v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Lev v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Lev v. United States (358 U.S. 903)
* Lev v. United States (360 U.S. 470)
# Letters of Julian/Letter 49

From The Works of the Emperor Julian, volume III (1913) Loeb Classical Library.

## 49. To Ecdicius, Prefect of Egypt

[362 or early in 363, from Antioch]
If there is anything that deserves our fostering care, it is the sacred art of music. Do you therefore select from the citizens of Alexandria boys of good birth, and give orders that two artabae of corn are to be furnished every month to each of them, with olive oil also, and wine. The overseers of the Treasury will provide them with clothing. For the present let these boys be chosen for their voices, but if any of them should prove capable of attaining to the higher study of the science of music, let them be informed that very considerable rewards for their work have been set aside at my court also. For they must believe those who have expressed right opinions on these matters that they themselves rather than we will be purified in soul by divinely inspired music, and benefit thereby. So much, then, for the boys. As for those who are now the pupils of Dioscorus the musician, do you urge them to apply themselves to the art with still more zeal, for I am ready to assist them to whatever they may wish.

## Footnotes

* ↑ For the study of music at Alexandria cf. Ammianus Marcellinus 22. 16. 17, nondumque apud eos penitus exaruit musica, nec harmonia conticuit.
* ↑ The artaba, an Egyptian dry measure, was equivalent to about nine gallons.
* ↑ Julian does not mean sacred music in particular; cf. Vol. 1, Oration 3. 111c, where θεία is used of secular music.