OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Ackermann’s Repository of Arts/Series 1/Volume 1/April 1809/Review of New Music

MUSICAL REVIEW.
In giving our opinion on the present work, we are well aware, that concertos are not so much intended to exhibit the science of the composer, as the skill and agility of the performer; and in this instance it is evident, that the principal aim of the author was that of giving to amateurs an opportunity of displaying moderate abilities to the greatest advantage; the composition is brilliant, and yet the passages lie perfectly under the hand.
The three movements of this concerto, consisting of a larghetto of a few bars, an allegro and rondo, are in C major.
The larghetto, although short, is expressive and solemn, and the responses introduced into the accompaniments cannot fail to add to the effect of the whole. In the allegro the character of martial music is preserved throughout, although in the different ideas little of originality is to be met with. We have been much pleased with some of Mr. L.’s modulations and transitions, particularly page 9 and 10. The subject, or rather the beginning of
​the rondo, is neat; but it is soon abandoned, for what appears to us the principal subject of this movement, viz. the celebrated air, Non piu andrai far fallone amoroso, in Mozart’s Nozze di Figaro, of which several clever variations are incorporated with the rondo. We are far from objecting to the introduction of such a masterpiece of military composition in Mr. L.’s military concerto; Mozart himself has borrowed it again in his Don Juan: on the contrary, the selection does credit to Mr. L.’s judgment. The whole of the concerto appears to us rather longer than what we know from experience to be a quantum sufficit for the usual impatience of a public audience; some passages, which cause a sensation of sameness, might therefore have been omitted or curtailed, without endangering the texture of the whole.
We trust the motives of this candid statement of our opinion will not be misconceived by the author of the military concerto, which in many respects merits our commendation as a brilliant performance, well adapted for the amusement and improvement of musical students; at the same time, that it entitles us to hope for further efforts of his promising pen.
# Ackermann’s Repository of Arts/Series 1/Volume 1/January 1809/Allegorical Wood-cut, with Patterns of British Manufacture

ALLEGORICAL WOOD-CUT, WITH PATTERNS OF BRITISH MANUFACTURE.
Patterns afford the manufacturer an opportunity of circulating a new article more extensively in one day, than can be done by sending a dozen riders with it through the country. It will likewise afford persons at a distance from the metropolis the means of examining and estimating the merit of the fabric, and of being made acquainted with the tradesman from whom it may be purchased.
Among the fashionable articles for gentlemen’s wear, we have given one of plush, manufactured from mohair, some of which are made in imitation of fur, others rival an article of the same nature made with silk.
The present cold weather has induced our young men of fashion to introduce this article pretty generally. The appearance is genteel and comfortable. The utility of this fabric for vests is sanctioned by sporting gentlemen, who have the lower part of the vest for six or seven inches lined with the same. After a hard chase, the loins do not experience that chill and cold which is often fell in the ride home, owing to the gentle irritation and warmth of the plush, which absorbs the perspiration.
At Coventry, the silk and ribbon manufactures are very much declined, but the introduction of this article, (at present made only by Messrs. Harris’s) if if it becomes general, bids fair to employ the poor of that place during the winter season. The pattern No. 1, is one among a great variety of colours of this article which we have observed in the shops of Mr. Smith, Prince’s-Street, Soho; Messrs. Maunds, Cornhill; and at the principal men-mercers. It is sold considerably under the silk plush, and looks as well.
No. 2 is the gold-coloured velvet described in the mantle of them morning dress, plate 1, and may be had of D. and P. Cooper, Pall-Mall.
No. 3 is a pattern of brocade or tissue, very much worn for pelisses, from Robarts, Plowman, and Snuggs, Chandos-Street, Covent-Garden.
No. 4 is an entire new flowered satin, for evening dresses, furnished by Harris, Moody, and Co. Pall-Mall.
The three last patterns are the manufacture of Spitalfields. The introduction of silks among our ladies of fashion, has revived the almost declining employment of the silk-weavers, and if it has the effect of excluding the fine fabrics of Indian manufacture, to the increase of our artizans at home, we shall feel very happy in the exchange.
No. I.January 1809.
The Repository
Of Arts, Literature, Commerce, Manufactures, Fashions, and Politics.
Manufacturers, Factors, and Wholesale Dealers in Fancy Goods that come within the scope of this Plan, are requested to send Patterns of such new Articles as they come out, and if the requisites of Novelty, Fashion, and Elegance are united, the quantity necessary for this Magazine will be ordered. R. Ackermann, 101, Strand, London.
# Adams v. Dugger

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
490 U.S. 1059
Adams v. Dugger
No. 88-7140 (A-875)
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
The application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice KENNEDY and by him referred to the Court is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
Justice BRENNAN, with whom Justice MARSHALL joins, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Adams v. Henderson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
168 U.S. 573
Adams v. Henderson
J. M. Wilson, for appellants.
C. C. Richards, for appellees.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Adams v. Illinois/Concurrence Blackmun

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Burger Blackmun
* Dissenting Opinion Douglas
MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN, concurring in the result.
Inasmuch as I feel that Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970), was wrongly decided, I concur in the result.
# Adams v. Illinois/Concurrence Burger

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Burger Blackmun
* Dissenting Opinion Douglas
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER, concurring in the result.
I concur in the result but maintain the view expressed in my dissent in Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1, 21 (1970), that while counsel should be provided at preliminary hearings as a matter of sound policy and judicial administration, there is no constitutional requirement that it be done. As I noted in Coleman, the constitutional command applies to "criminal prosecutions," not to the shifting notion of "critical stages." Nor can I join in the view that it is a function of constitutional adjudication to assure that defense counsel can "fashion a vital impeachment tool for use in cross-examination of the State's witnesses at the trial" or "discover the case the State has against his client." [p286] 399 U.S., at 9. Nothing could better illustrate the extra-constitutional scope of Coleman than the interpretation of it now to explain why we do not make it "retroactive."
# Adams v. Illinois
## Concurring Opinions

    Burger
    Blackmun

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
Supreme Court of the United States
405 U.S. 278
Adams v. Illinois
Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois
No. 70-5038 Argued: December 7, 1971 --- Decided: March 6, 1972
Petitioner's pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment against him because of the court's failure to appoint counsel to represent him at the preliminary hearing in 1967 was denied, and petitioner was tried and convicted. The Illinois Supreme Court affirmed on the ground that Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1, in which this Court held that a preliminary hearing is a critical stage of the criminal process at which the accused is constitutionally entitled to assistance of counsel, did not have retroactive application.
Held: The judgment is affirmed. Pp. 280-286.
46 Ill. 2d 200, 263 N.E. 2d 490, affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, joined by MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE WHITE, concluded that Coleman v. Alabama, supra, does not apply retroactively to preliminary hearings conducted before June 22, 1970, when Coleman was decided. Pp. 280-285.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER concurred in the result, concluding, as set forth in his dissent in Coleman, that there is no constitutional requirement that counsel should be provided at preliminary hearings. Pp. 285-286.
MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN concurred in the result, concluding that Coleman was wrongly decided. P. 286.
BRENNAN, J., announced the Court's judgment and delivered an opinion, in which STEWART and WHITE, JJ., joined. BURGER, C.J., filed an opinion concurring in the result, post, p. 285. BLACKMUN, J., filed a statement concurring in the result, post, p. 286. DOUGLAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which MARSHALL, J., joined, post, p. 286. POWELL and REHNQUIST, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Edward M. Genson argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Charles B. Evins, Eugene Pincham, and Sam Adam.
E. James Gildea argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were William J. Scott, Attorney General of Illinois, Joel M. Flaum, First Assistant Attorney General, and James B. Zagel and James R. Streicker, Assistant Attorneys General.
# Adams v. La Comb

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
ADAMS verſus LA COME.
R
SHIPPEN,President, in the charge to the Jury, delivered it as the clear opinion of the Court, that the right of pursuing and seizing goods after their removal, was confined to the goods of the Lessee, from whom the rent was really due ; and that the goods of a stranger could only be distrained while they were on the premisses.
# A Naval Biographical Dictionary/Miall, George Gover

Layout 4
​MIALL. (Commander, 1838. f-p., 24; h-p., 23.)
George Gover Miall entered the Navy. 24 Feb. 1800, as Third-cl, Vol., on board the Achille 74, Capts. Geo. Murray and Edw. Buller, bearing the flag in the Channel of Earl St. Vincent; and from June, 1802, until Oct. 1806, was employed on the North American station, chiefly in the capacity of Midshipman, in the 50-gun ships Leander and Leopard, Capts. Jas, Oughton, Fras. Wm. Fane, Alex. S. Kene, Wm. Lyall, John Talbot, Henry Whitby, and Salusbury Pryce Humphreys. In the Leander, under Capt. Talbot, he assisted at the capture, 23 Feb. 1805, of the French frigate La Ville de Milan, of 48 guns, and the simultaneous re-capture of her prize, the Cleopatra 32. On leaving the Leopard as above he was appointed to the command, with the rank of Sub-Lieutenant, of the Chebuctoo schooner, also on the American station, where, in April, 1807, he was ordered to act as Lieutenant-Commander of the Bream, another schooner, to which he was confirmed by a commission dated 11 April, 1808. His succeeding appointments were, to the command – 1 June and 25 July, 1809, of the Duguay Trouin and Vesta schooners, in the latter of which we find him employed until Sept. 1815 in carrying despatches to the West Indies, the coast of Africa, the Mediterranean, Newfoundland, and the coasts of Portugal, France, and Spain – 5 April, 1826, for three years, of the Royal Charlotte Revenue-vessel – 1 Nov. 1832, of the Minx 3, on the Jamaica station, where he remained until the following Aug. – and, 6 Sept. 1833, of the Forester 3, in which vessel, attached to the force on the African coast, he had the fortune, in the course of three years and a half, to effect the capture of five slavers, having on board 1115 negroes, and to make prize of two others fully equipped. During the nine months immediately antecedent to his promotion to the rank of Commander, 28 June, 1838, Lieut. Miall officiated as Admiralty Agent on board a contract mail steam-vessel. He has since been on half-pay. Agent – Joseph Woodhead.
# A Naval Biographical Dictionary/Michell, Reynell Charles

Layout 4
​MICHELL. (Commander, 1843. h-p., 19; h-p., 6.)
Reynell Charles Michell entered the Navy 7 Feb. 1822; and, while Midshipman of the Arachne 18, bore an active part in the hostilities in Ava, where his conduct procured him the highest encomiums of his Captain, Henry Ducie Chads. He was made Lieutenant, 11 Nov. 1829, into the Satellite 18, Capt. John Parker, attached to the force in the East Indies; and was afterwards appointed – 22 Aug. 1831, to the Challenger 28, Capt. Chas. Howe Fremantle, on the same station, whence he returned in 1833 – 15 June, 1835, as Senior, to the Raleigh 18, Capt. Michael Quin, also in the East Indies – 30 Oct. 1838, in a similar capacity, to the Tyne 26, commanded in the Mediterranean by Capt. John Townshend – 6 May, 1841, still as Senior, to the Hydra steamer, Capt. Alex. Murray, on the North America and West India station – and, 20 March and 29 July, 1842, to the Magnificent and Imaum, receiving-ships at Jamaica, each bearing the broad pendant of Hon. Henry Dilkes Byng. He was promoted to his present rank, after having been for a few months on half-pay, 19 July, 1843; and, since 15 Sept. 1847, has been in command of the Devastation steam-sloop, of 400 horse-power, on the coast of Africa. Agents – Holmes and Folkard.
# A Naval Biographical Dictionary/Middleton, John

Layout 4
​MIDDLETON. (Lieut., 1811. f-p., 12; h-p., 31.)
John Middleton entered the Navy, 5 Feb. 1804, as Fst.-cl. Vol., on board the Montagu 74, Capt. Robt. Waller Otway; and on 22 Aug. 1805 was present, as Midshipman, in Admiral Hon. Wm. Cornwallis’ pursuit of the French fleet into Brest, on which occasion the Montagu exchanged fire with the French 80-gun ship L’Alexandre. After assisting at the evacuation of Scylla, and further serving with Capt. Otway on board the Malta 80, he became attached as a Supernumerary, in Nov. 1808, to the Salvador del Mundo, flag-ship at Plymouth of Admiral Young. Joining next, in Jan. 1809, the Tribune 36, Capt. Geo. Reynolds, he shared, in the course of that year, in an action fought with several Danish gun-boats in the Belt; and, on 12 May, 1810, he was afforded an opportunity of participating in a gallant conflict of two hours and a quarter, in which the same frigate, with a loss of 9 men killed and 15 wounded, beat off, on the coast of Norway, four Danish brigs-of-war, carrying altogether 74 guns. As a reward for his conduct in the latter affair, Mr. Middleton, on proceeding to the West Indies, was appointed, 28 April, 1811, Admiralty-Midshipman of the Dragon 74, flag-ship of Sir Fras. Laforey, who, on 5 of the ensuing month, nominated him Lieutenant of the Arachne 18, Capt. Sam. Chambers – an act which was sanctioned by a commission bearing date 29 Oct. in the same year. He served last, from 10 April, 1812, until 5 July, 1813, and from 19 Nov. following until Jan. 1816, in his former ship the Tribune, still commanded by Capt. Reynolds, and in the Medina 20, Capt. Henry Bourchier, on the West India and Newfoundland stations.
The Lieutenant married, 11 April, 1822, a daughter of ___ Scott, Esq., of Parliament Street, London.
# A Naval Biographical Dictionary/Micklethwait, Henry Sharnborne Nathaniel

Layout 4
​MICKLETHWAIT. (Lieutenant, 1842.)
Henry Sharnborne Nathaniel Micklethwait, born 12 Aug. 1814, is second son of Nathaniel Micklethwait, Esq., of Taverham and Beeston Halls, co. Norfolk, by his second wife. Lady Charlotte Rous, second daughter of the first Earl of Stradbrooke; half-brother of Lieut.-Colonel Nathaniel Waldegrave Micklethwait, of the Scots Fusileer Guards; and nephew of Sir S. B. Peckham Micklethwait, some time a Captain in the 3rd Dragoon Guards, who was created a Baronet 27 July, 1838, for a personal service rendered to Her Majesty and the Duchess of Kent at St. Leonard’s, co. Sussex, in Nov. 1832. His father’s first wife was the Lady Maria Waldegrave, daughter of George, fourth Earl of Waldegrave.
This officer entered the Navy, from the Royal Naval College, 11 Feb. 1830; passed his examination 3 June, 1835; and, after serving for a short time as Mate of the Dublin 50, flag-ship in the Pacific of Rear-Admiral Rich. Thomas, was promoted to the rank of Lieutenant 3 Feb. 1842. His succeeding appointments were – on 7 of the same month, again to the Dublin – and, 1 Oct. 1844, and 15 April, 1845, to the Alfred 50, Commodore John Brett Purvis, and Curaçoa 24, Capt. Wm. Broughton, both on the south-east coast of America, whence he returned in 1847.
# A Naval Biographical Dictionary/Meynell, Francis

Layout 4
​MEYNELL. (Lieutenant, 1846.)
Francis Meynell served as Midshipman, during the campaign in China, on board the Calliope 26, Capt. Thos. Herbert, and was mentioned for the assistance he rendered at the capture, 13 March, 1841, of the last fort protecting the approaches to the city of Canton. He passed his examination 17 Dec. 1842; and after having served for upwards of two years on the coast of Africa, as Mate, in the Penelope steamer. Commodore Wm. Jones, Rapid 10, Lieut.-Commander Edw. Chas. Earle, and Star 6, Capt. Robt. John Wallace Dunlop, was presented with a commission dated 15 Jan. 1846, and reappointed, in the capacity of Additional-Lieutenant, to the Penelope. He went on half-pay soon afterwards, and has not been since employed.
# A Naval Biographical Dictionary/Mildmay, Hervey George St. John

Layout 4
​MILDMAY. (Lieutenant, 1844.)
Hervey George St. John Mildmay is second son of Paulet St. John Mildmay, Esq., by Anna Maria, youngest daughter of the Hon. Bartholomew Bouverie; and nephew of Capt. G. W. St. John Mildmay, R.N.
This officer entered the Navy 6 Jan. 1832; passed his examination 15 March, 1838; served as Mate of the Talbot 26, Capt. Robt. Fanshawe Stopford, at the bombardment of St. Jean d’Acre, 3 Nov. 1840; and, while on the North America and West India station, in the Pique 36, Capt. Hon. Montagu Stopford, was promoted to the rank of Lieutenant, 24 Feb. 1844. His appointments have since been – 1 March, 1844, as Additional, to the Illustrious 72, bearing the flag of Sir Chas. Adam, Commander-in-Chief in North America and the West Indies – 16 Oct. following, again to the Pique – and, 14 Oct. 1846 (soon after the latter ship had been paid off), to the Thetis 36, Capt. Henry John Codrington, now in the Mediterranean.
# A Naval Biographical Dictionary/Mildmay, George William St. John

Layout 4
​MILDMAY. (Captain, 1828. f-p., 22; h-p., 22.)
George William St. John Mildmay is third son of the late Sir Henry Paulet St. John Mildmay, Bart., by Jane, eldest daughter and co-heir of Carew Mildmay, Esq., of Shawford House, co. Hants; brother of the present Sir Henry Carew St. John Mildmay, Bart.; brother-in-law of Lord Methuen, the Viscount Bolingbroke, and the Earl of Radnor; and uncle of Lieut. H. G. St. J. Mildmay, R.N. One of his brothers, Humphrey, married the eldest daughter of Lord Ashburton, and another, Carew, in Holy Orders, the youngest sister of Rear-Admiral Lord Radstock, C.B.
This officer entered the Navy, 14 Sept. 1803, as Fst.-cl. Vol., on board the Ardent 64, Capt. Robt. Winthrop; and on 28 of the following Nov. was present, as Midshipman, at the destruction of La Bayonnaise French frigate of 32 guns and 200 men, in Finisterre Bay. He continued to serve in the Ardent, also in the Revenge 74, Capt. Robt. Moorsom, and again with Capt. Winthrop in the Sybille 44, on the Home station, until June, 1807; and between that period and April, 1812, was employed, chiefly in the Mediterranean, on board the Canopus 80, flag-ship of Rear-Admiral Geo. Martin, Fame 74, Capt. Walter Bathurst, and Menelaus 38, Capt. Sir Peter Parker. In the Canopus we find him uniting, in Oct. 1809, in a chase which led to the self-destruction of the French ships-of-the-line Robuste and Lion off Cape Cette. He was confirmed a Lieutenant (after having acted for a few weeks as such) in the Trident 64, bearing the flag at Malta of Rear-Admiral John Laugharne, 19 May, 1812, and was subsequently appointed – 5 Aug. 1813 for passage home, to the Kingfisher sloop, Capt. Ewell Tritton – 17 Dec. following, to the Leander 50, Capt. Sir Geo. Ralph Collier, under whom he saw much active service on the coast of America – 18 Sept. 1815, to the Euphrates 36, Capt. Robt Preston, lying at Sheerness – 24 Nov. 1818 (having left the last-mentioned ship in April, 1816), to the ​Wasp 18, Capt. Thos. Wren Carter, fitting for the West Indies, where he assisted at the capture of the Venezuelan sloop-of-war El Libertador, bearing the broad pendant of Commodore Chitty, and a Spanish brigantine, her prize – and, 2 July, 1821 (11 months after the Wasp had been paid off), to the Iphigenia 42, ecLuipping for the broad pendant of Sir Robt. Mends, Commodore of the African squadron. In command of the boats of that frigate, and of the Myrmidon 20, Mr. Mildmay won distinction by the gallant manner in which, overcoming a desperate resistance, he effected, off the river Bonny, the capture of five vessels having on board upwards of 1800 negroes. As a reward he was promoted to the rank of Commander 10 Aug. 1822. He obtained command of the Cordelia sloop, of 10 guns, 15 Nov. 1826; acquired Post-rank 16 Aug. 1828; and was lastly, from 14 April, 1835, until paid off at the close of 1838, employed on the Home station in the Magicienne 24.
Capt. Mildmay married, 28 April, 1832, Mary, widow of John Morritt, Esq., of Rokeby, co. York, by whom he has issue. Agents – Hallett and Robinson.