OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Mahant

​Mahant.— The Mahant is the secular head and trustee of the temple at Tirumala (Upper Tirupati) in the North Arcot district, and looks after the worldly affairs of the swāmi (god). "Tirupati," Mr. H. A. Stuart writes,* "unlike most other temples, has no dancing-girls attached to it, and not to be strictly continent upon the sacred hill is a deadly sin. Of late years, however, even celibate Bairāgis and priests take their paramours up with them, and the pilgrims follow suit. Everything is held to betoken the approaching downfall of the temple's greatness. The irregular life of the Mahant Balarām Dās sixty years ago caused a great ferment, though similar conduct now would probably hardly attract notice. He was ejected from his office by the unanimous voice of his disciples, and one Gōvardhan Dās, whose life was consistent with the holy office, was elected, and installed in the math (monastery) near the temple. Balarām Dās, however, collected a body of disbanded peons from the pālaiyams, and, arming them, made an attack upon the building. The walls were scaled, and the new Mahant with his disciples shut themselves up in an inner apartment. In an attempt at rescue, one man was killed, and three were seriously wounded. A police force was sent to co-operate with the Tirupati poligars (feudal chiefs), but could effect nothing till the insurgent peons were threatened with the ​loss of all their lands. This broke up the band, and Balarām Dās' followers deserted him. When the gates were broken open, it was found that he and a few staunch followers had committed suicide. But perhaps the greatest scandal which has occurred in the history of the math was that which ended in the conviction of the present Mahant's predecessor, Bhagavān Dās. He was charged with having misappropriated a number of gold coins of considerable value, which were supposed to have been buried beneath the great flagstaff. A search warrant was granted, and it was discovered that the buried vessels only contained copper coins. The Mahant was convicted of the misappropriation of the gold, and was sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment, but this was reduced to one year by the High Court. On being released from jail, he made an effort to oust his successor, and acquire possession of the math by force. For this he was again sent to jail, for six months, and required to furnish security to be of good behaviour."
It is recorded by Sir M. E. Grant Duff,* formerly Governor of Madras, that "while the municipal address was being read to me, a huge elephant, belonging to the Zemindar of Kalahastri, a great temporal chief, charged a smaller elephant belonging to the Mahant or High Priest of Tripaty, thus disestablishing the church much more rapidly, alas! than we did in Ireland."
* ↑ • Manual of the North Arcol district.
* ↑ * Notes from a Diary, 1881— 1886.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Madhya

​Madhya. — Madhya or Madhaya is a sub-division of Bottada and Sondi.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Madurai

​Madurai. — The name of a sub-division of Shānān, apparently meaning sweet liquor, and not the town of Madura.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Magadha Kani

​'Magadha Kani.___Recorded, at times of census, as a sub-division of Bhatrāzu.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kūndu

​Kūndu (nest). — A sub-division of the Irulas of South Arcot.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kūttan

​Kūttan.— A division of Toda.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kūttina

​Kūttina.——Recorded, in the Travancore Census Report, 1901, as a sub-division of Nāyar.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kūrma

​Kūrma (tortoise). — A gōtra of Nagarālu. The equivalent Kurum is recorded as a sept of Pentiya.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kūrmapu

​Kūrmapu.— "The Kurmapuvāllu are women, in the Vizagapatam district, who have not entered into matrimony, but earn money by prostitution, and acting as dancers at feasts. They are so called from the fact that they were originally dancing-girls attached to the temple of Srī Kūrmam, a place of pilgrimage in Vizagapatam.*
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kūrākula

​Kūrākula (vegetable class). — An occupational title, returned at times of census, by Oriya and Telugu cultivators in Ganjam and Vizagapatam.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kūdaikatti

​Kūdaikatti (basket-making).—A sub-division of Palli or Vanniyan. At the census, 1901, some Koravas also returned themselves as Kūdaikatti Vanniyan.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kūnapilli

​Kūnapilli.— A synonym of Padigarājulu, a class of mendicants, who beg from Padma Sālēs.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kōyippuram

​Kōyippuram.—Recorded, in the Travancore Census Report, 1901, as a sub-division of Nāyar.
# Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent/Session XV/Proroguing the Session

SESSION THE FIFTEENTH,
Being the fifth under the Sovereign Pontiff Julius III., celebrated on the twenty-fifth day of January, 1552.
DECREE FOR PROROGUING THE SESSION.
Whereas, in pursuance of what was decreed in the last sessions, this holy and universal synod has, during these days, most accurately and diligently treated of the things relating to the most holy sacrifice of the Mass, and to the sacrament of Orders, with the view that, in the session this day held, it might publish, as the Holy Ghost should have suggested, decrees on these subjects; and, furthermore, the four articles pertaining to the most holy sacrament of the Eucharist, which had been finally deferred to this session; and, whereas, it thought that in the interim, those would ​have presented themselves at this sacred and holy council, who call themselves Protestants, for whose sake it had deferred the publication of those articles, and to whom it had given the public faith, or a safe-conduct, that they might come freely and without any hesitation; nevertheless, since they have not yet come, and petition in their name has been made to the holy synod, that the publication which was to have been made on this day, be deferred until the following session, an assured hope being held out that they will certainly be present long before that session, meanwhile, upon receiving a safe-conduct in a more ample form: The same holy synod, lawfully assembled in the Holy Ghost,—the same legate and nuncios presiding,—desiring nothing more ardently than to remove from amongst the most noble nation of Germany, all dissensions and schisms touching religion, and to provide for its rest, peace, and repose; being ready, should they come, both to receive them kindly, and to listen to them with good-will, and trusting that they will come, not with the design of obstinately opposing the Catholic faith, but of learning the truth, and that they will at last, as becomes those earnest after evangelical truth, acquiesce in the decrees and discipline of holy Mother Church; [this synod] has deferred the next session for the publishing and promulgating of the matters aforesaid, till the festival of St. Joseph, which will be on the nineteenth day of the month of March; in order that they may have sufficient time and leisure, not only to come, but also to propose, before that day arrives, what things soever they may wish. And, that it may take from them all cause for further delaying, it freely gives and grants them the public faith, or a safe-conduct, of the tenor and form which will be hereafter set down. But it ordains and decrees, that, in the mean time, it will treat of the sacrament of Matrimony, and, in addition to the publication of the above-named decrees, it will give its decision thereon, in the same session, and will pursue the subject of Reformation.
# Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent/Session XVIII/Extension of the Safe-conduct to other Nations

EXTENSION [OF THE SAFE-CONDUCT] TO OTHER NATIONS.
The same sacred and holy synod, lawfully assembled in the Holy Ghost,—the same legates a latere of the Apostolic See presiding therein,—grants the public faith, or a safe-conduct, under the same form, and in the same terms, wherein it is granted to the Germans, to all and each of those others, who hold not communion with us in the matters of faith, of whatsoever kingdoms, nations, provinces, cities, and places [they may be], wherein the contrary to that which the holy Roman Church doth entertain, is publicly and with impunity preached, taught, or believed.
# Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent/Session XIX/Prorogation of the Session

SESSION THE NINETEENTH,
Being the third under the Sovereign Pontiff Pius IV., celebrated on the fourteenth day of May, 1562.
DECREE FOR THE PROROGATION OF THE SESSION.
The sacred and holy, œcumenical and general Synod of Trent, lawfully assembled in the Holy Ghost,—the same legates of the Apostolic See presiding therein,—has, for certain just and fitting reasons, thought fit to prorogue, and doth [hereby] prorogue, until the Thursday after the approaching solemnity of Corpus Christi, which will be the day before the nones of June, those decrees which were to have been this day ordained and sanctioned in the present session; and it indicts to all men, that, on the said day, a session will be held and celebrated. Meanwhile, God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the author of peace, is to be implored, that He would sanctify the hearts of all; that, by His help, the holy synod may be enabled, both now and ever, to meditate and perform those things which shall be unto His praise and glory.
# Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent/Session XVII/Celebrating the Council

SESSION THE SEVENTEENTH
Of the Holy, Œcumenical, and General Council of Trent, being the first under the Sovereign Pontiff Pius IV., celebrated on the eighteenth day of January, 1562.
DECREE FOR CELEBRATING THE COUNCIL.
Doth it please you, unto the praise and glory of the Holy and undivided Trinity, Father, and Son, and Holy Ghost, ​unto the increase and exaltation of the faith, and of the Christian religion, that the sacred, œcumenical, and general Council of Trent, lawfully assembled in the Holy Ghost, be, all manner of suspension removed, celebrated from this day, which is the eighteenth of the month of January, in the year mdlxii from our Lord's nativity, consecrated to the chair of the blessed Peter, according to the form and tenor of the letter of our most holy lord, the Sovereign Pontiff: Pius IV.; and that, due order being observed, those things be treated of therein, which, the legates and presidents proposing, shall appear to the said holy synod fitting and proper for alleviating the calamities of these times, appeasing controversies concerning religion, restraining deceitful tongues, correcting the abuses of depraved manners, and procuring for the Church a true and Christian peace?
They answered: It pleaseth.
# Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent/Session XVII/Indiction of the next Session

INDICTION OF THE NEXT SESSION,
Doth it please you that the next ensuing session be held and celebrated on the Thursday after the second Sunday of Lent, which will be on the twenty-sixth day of the month of February?
They answered: It pleaseth.
# Brock v. Northwestern Fuel Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
130 U.S. 341
Brock v. Northwestern Fuel Company
C. A. Clark, for plaintiffs in error.
C. D. O'Brien, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Brock v. North Carolina

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Frankfurter

## Dissenting Opinions

    Vinson
    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
344 U.S. 424
Brock v. North Carolina
Argued: Oct. 23, 1952. --- Decided: Feb 2, 1953
Mr. Robert S.C.ahoon, Greensboro, N.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Ralph Moody, Raleigh, N.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice MINTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Brock v. North Carolina/Concurrence Frankfurter

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Frankfurter
* Dissenting Opinions Vinson Douglas
United States Supreme Court
344 U.S. 424
Brock v. North Carolina
Argued: Oct. 23, 1952. --- Decided: Feb 2, 1953
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER, concurring.
Once it is agreed that the claim here made-freedom from being tried a second time on a criminal charge-must be tested by the independent scope of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and not on the basis of the incorporation of the Fifth Amendment into the Fourteenth, the application of the guarantee of due process to a specific situation makes relevant the specific phrasing of a common result. I, therefore, deem it appropriate to add a word to the Court's opinion, in which I join.
The judicial history of the Fifth Amendment in prohibiting any person from being 'subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb' serves as a good pragmatic confirmation of the compelling reasons why the original Bill of Rights was found to limit the actions of the Federal Government and not those of the States. The conflicting views expressed in Ex parte Lange, 18 Wall. 163, 21 L.Ed. 872; Kepner v. United States, 195 U.S. 100, 24 S.Ct. 797, 49 L.Ed. 114; Trono v. United States, 199 U.S. 521, 26 S.Ct. 121, 50 L.Ed. 292; In re Bradley, 318 U.S. 50, 63 S.Ct. 470, 87 L.Ed. 500; and Wade v. Hunter, 336 U.S. 684, 69 S.Ct. 834, 93 L.Ed. 974, indicate the subtle technical controversies to which the provision of the Fifth Amendment against double jeopardy has given rise. Implications have been found in that provision very different from the mood of fair dealing and justice which the Fourteenth Amendment exacts from a State in the prosecution of offenders. A State falls short of its obligation when it callously subjects an individual to successive retrials on a charge on which he has been acquitted or prevents a trial from proceeding to a termination in favor of the accused merely in order to allow a prosecutor who has been incompetent or casual or even ineffective to see if he cannot do better a second time.
Unless we can say that the trial judge was not justified in the circumstances of this case in concluding that the ground for requesting a mistrial was fair and not oppressive to the accused, we would not be warranted in finding that the State of North Carolina, through its Supreme Court, denied the petitioner due process of law. The record does not seem to me to justify such a finding.
Mr. Chief Justice VINSON, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baker v. Power

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
124 U.S. 167
Baker v. Power
Wm. H. Bliss, for the motion.
J. H. Davidson, against the motion.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baker v. Grice

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
169 U.S. 284
Baker v. Grice
This appeal is from an order of the United States circuit court for the Northern district of Texas, made upon a return to a writ of habeas corpus issued by that court to inquire into the cause for the detention of the petitioner, William Grice, who, it was alleged, was unlawfully restrained of his liberty by, and held in the custody of, J. W. Baker, the sheriff of McLennan county, Tex. After a hearing, the circuit court, on the 22d of February, 1897, discharged the petitioner. 79 Fed. 627.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baker v. Nachtrieb

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
60 U.S. 126
Baker v. Nachtrieb
THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the western district of Pennsylvania, sitting as a court of equity.
It was a bill filed by Nachtrieb, under the circumstances mentioned in the opinion of the court.
The Circuit Court, after having referred the case to a master to state an account, decreed that the trustees should pay to Nachtrieb the sum of $3,890; from which decree the trustees appealed to this court.
It was argued by Mr. Stanberry and Mr. Loomis for the appellants, and by Mr. Stanton for the appellee.
Mr. Justice CAMPBELL delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baker v. Humphrey

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
101 U.S. 494
Baker v. Humphrey
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan.
This was a bill filed by Sandford Baker against George P. Humphrey, Hiram D. Hurd, Charles A. Hurd, and David Smith, to have the ostensible legal title to certain premises which had vested in Humphrey by one Chapman declared to have been fraudulently obtained, and that Humphrey be adjudged to convey the premises to the complainant. The bill was heard upon the pleadings and proofs, and dismissed. Baker appealed here.
The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Theodore Romeyn for the appellant.
Mr. George W. Dyer and Mr. John Atkinson, contra.
MR. JUSTICE SWAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Yēnuga

​Yēnuga.—Yēnuga or Yēnigala, meaning elephant, has been recorded as an exogamous sept of Kāpu, the members of which will not touch ivory.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Zonnala

​Zonnala (millet : Sorghum vulgare). — Zonnala, or the equivalent Zonnūkuti, has been recorded as an exogamous sept of Kāpu. The Kōyis hold a festival when the zonna crop is ready to be cut, at which a fowl is killed in the field, and its blood sprinkled on a stone set up for the purpose.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Yēdu Mādala

​Yēdu Mādala (seven madalas).—The name of a section of Upparas, indicating the amount of the bride-price. A mādala is equivalent to two rupees.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Yōgi Gurukkal

​Yōgi Gurukkal. — The Yōgi Gurukkals are described in the Madras Census Report, 1891, as "a Malayālam speaking beggar caste. They are also priests in Kāli temples, and pial schoolmasters. They bury their dead in a sitting posture (like Sanyāsis)." The pial, it may be noted, is a raised platform under the verandah, or on either side of the door of a house, in which village schools are held.
The Yōgi Gurukkals are scattered about Malabar, and their chief occupation seems to be the performance of worship to Kāli or Durga. They officiate as priests for Mukkuvans and Tiyans. Among the Mukkuvans, pūja (worship) to Kāli at the annual festival has to be done by a Yōgi Gurukkal, whereas, on ordinary occasions, it may be done by a Mukkuvan, provided that he has been initiated by a Yōgi Gurukkal. In their customs, the Yōgi Gurukkals closely follow the Nāyars.
It is recorded, in the Gazetteer of Malabar, that "the Yōgi Gurukkals of North Malabar are a caste which, though low in the social scale, is not regarded as conveying distance pollution. They perform sakti pūja in their own houses, to which no one outside the caste is allowed to attend; they also perform it for Nāyars and Tiyans. They are celebrated sorcerers and exorcists, and are also schoolmasters by profession."
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Āchāri

​Āchāri. — See Āsāri.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Ādapāpa

​Ādapāpa.—Returned in the Madras Census Report, 1901, as a sub-caste of Balija. The name is applied to female attendants on the ladies of the families of Zamindars, who, as they are not allowed to marry, lead a life of prostitution. Their sons call themselves Balijas (see Khāsa).
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Yānāti

​Yānāti.— The Yānātls, Yēnētis, or Ēnētis, are a class of cultivators in the Ganjam and Vizagapatam districts, between whom and the Yānādis some confusion has arisen. For example, it is noted, in the Madras Census Report, 1891, that it is curious to find the Yānādi sub-division of the Velamas so strongly represented, for there is at the present day a wide gulf between Velamas and Yānādis, Again, in the Census Report, 1901, it is noticed under the heading Yānāti that "entries of this name were clubbed with Yānādi, but it has since been reported that, in Bissumcuttack taluk of the Vizagapatam Agency, there is a separate caste called Yānāti or Yēnēti Dora, which is distinct from either Yānādi or Konda Dora."
It is said that the Yānātis of Ganjam also go by the name of Entamara and Gainta or Gayinta.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Yēnumala

​Yēnumala.—Yēnumala or Yēnamaloru, meaning buffalo or buffalo people, has been recorded as an exogamous sept of Balija, Bōya, Mādiga, and Oddē.
{{smallrefs}
# Beauties of Glasgow/Fy gar rub her o'er wi' strae

Fy gar rub her o'er wi' Strae.
GIN ye meet a bonny lassie, Gie her a kiss, and let her gae; But it she be a dirty hissie, fy gar rub her o'er wi' strae.
Be sure ye dinna quat the grip, or ilka joy when ye are young, Before auld age your vitals nip, and lay you twafold o'er a rung.
Sweet youth's a blyth and heartsome time, then lads and lassies, while its May, Gae pou the gowan in its prime, before it wither and decay.
Watch the fast minutes of delight, when Jenny speaks beneath her breath, ​And kisses, laying a’ the wite On you, if she keep ony skaith.
Haith ye're ill-bred, she’ll smiling say, ye'll worry me, ye greedy rook; Syne frae your arms she'll rin away, and hide hersel in some dark nook.
Her laugh will lead you to the place where lies the happiness ye want, And plainly tells you to your face, nineteen naysays are half a grant.
Now to her heaving bosom cling, and sweetly toolie for a kiss Frae her fair finger whop a ring, as token of a future bliss.
These benisons, I'm very sure, are of the gods indulgent grant; Then surly Charles, whish forbear, to plague us with your whinning cant.
F I N I S.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse