# U.S. Route Numbering Committee Agenda 1959-06-11

* related portals: American Association of State Highway Officials.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY OFFICIALS 917 National Press Building Washington 4, D.C.
U. S. ROUTE NUMBERING COMMITTEE AGENDA Chicago, Illinois, June 10, 1959
ACTION TAKEN BY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE-JUNE 11, 1959
| STATE | ROUTE | DESCRIPTION |
| MICHIGAN APPROVED | U. S. 2 Relocation | This routing will be over a high type facility (Interstate Route 75) between St. Ignace and Sault Ste. Marie. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 10 Relocation | This routing will be over several sections of a high type facility beginning southeast of Clare, thence southeasterly to U. S. Route 23 (Interstate Route 75) west of Bay City, thence southerly to present U. S. Route 10 north of Clio. Another section beginning at the intersection of Interstate Route 75 south of Flint, thence southerly with Interstate Route 75 to the intersection of Interstate Route 75 and present U. S. Route 10 northwest of Pontiac. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 10 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route | This routing would be over 2 sections in Midland. One section would extend due north from the northern terminus of present U. S. Route 10 Business Route to newly marked U.S. Route 10 (Interstate Route 75). The other section would be over a new section of highway (M-20) constructed in Midland north of the present location of M-20 connecting with newly marked U. S. Route 10 (Interstate Route 75) at eastern edge of Midland. The section of Business Route U. S. 10 between the junctions of old and new M-20 is to be deleted from the records on this route. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 12 Relocation | This routing will be over several sections of high type highway beginning at the intersection of present U. S. Route 12 and U. S. Route 112 a short distance north of the Michigan-Indiana State line, thence east to Interstate Route 94, thence northerly with I-94 bypassing Benton Harbor, thence easterly with I-94 to present U. S. 12 east of Kalamazoo. Another section beginning at the intersection of present U. S. 12 and I-94 southwest of Battle Creek, thence easterly with I-94 by-passing Battle Creek, Marshall and Albion to ​junction with present U. S. Route 12 east of Albion. Another section beginning at the junction of Business Route U. S. 12 east of Jackson, thence easterly over Interstate Route 94 to junction with present U. S. Route 12. Another section beginning at the junction of Interstate Route 94 and present U. S. 12 west of Ann Arbor, thence east to an intersection with present U. S. Route 12 (Interstate Route 94). Also a short section beginning at the southeastern edge of Ypsilanti at the intersection of U. S. 112, Interstate Route 94 and present U. S. Route 12, thence easterly with Interstate Route 94 to the intersection with present U. S. 12. |
| APRROVED | U. S. 16 Relocation | This routing will be over several sections of high type highway beginning in Muskegon at intersection of present U. S. 16, Business Route U. S. 31 and Interstate Route 196, thence south and east with I-196 and Business Route U. S. 31 to junction with U. S. 31 south of Muskegon Heights, thence southeasterly with I-196 bypassing Grand Rapids on the north and east sides to an intersection with Interstate Route 96, thence easterly with I-96 bypassing Lansing on the west and south sides, Howell on the south side to an intersection with present U. S. 16 at the interchange with U. S. 23 a short distance east of Howell. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 16 B. R. Recognition of Business Route | This routing follows Michigan Trunk Route 37 from a junction with newly marked U. S. 16: (I-196) south with M-37 into Grand Rapids, thence east with present U. S. 16 B. R. to a junction with U. S. 131 B. R., thence south on newly constructed M-37 to present U. S. 16 B. R. The section of U. S. 16 B. R. through Farmington is to be deleted as it wi11 be marked as "Off-Interstate System" Business Loop 96 (Green shield with white letters and numerals). |
| APPROVED | U. S. 23 Relocation | This routing begins at the junction of present U. S. 23 and a spur to Interstate Route 75 northwest of Bay City, thence southerly with I-75 bypassing Bay City on the west side to the junction of present U. S. 23 and M-81. Another action begins southwest of Saginaw at the junction of present U. S. 23 and I-75, thence southerly with I-75 to present U. S. 23 northwest of Clio. Another section begins at the intersection of present U. S. 23 and M-59, thence south on a new facility to a junction with present U. S. 23 and M-36. ​Also, beginning on present U. S. 23 north of Ann Arbor, thence over a new facility by-passing Ann Arbor on the north and east sides to a junction with present U. S. 23 near the Washtenaw-Monroe County line. Also, beginning a few miles south of the Monroe-Washtenaw County line on present U. S. 23, thence over a new facility paralleling former U. S. 23 via junction of old U. S. 23 and M-50 near Dundee, thence south to the Michigan-Ohio State line east of U. S. Route 223. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 23 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route | This routing would be over M-87 from junction with present U. S. 23 west of Fenton, thence east into Fenton, thence in a southwesterly direction over local highway to present U. S. 23. Also, beginning at the junction of present U. S. 23 and former U. S. 23 north of Ann Arbor, then follow former U. S. 23 southerly through Ann Arbor to junction with present U. S. 23 near the southeast corner of the city. Also, U. S. 23, B. R. in Bay City is to be deleted as that route wi11 became "Off-Interstate System" Business Loop 75. Also, U. S. 23 B. R. through Saginaw and south to present U. S. 23 is to be deleted as a portion of the route is to become Business Loop 75. (Off-Interstate System). |
| | U. S. 24 A Deletion of an Alternate Route | The section of U. S. 24A between the Michigan-Ohio State line has been constructed and marked as Interstate Route 75 and it is desired that all U. S. 24A markers on that route be removed and that portion of U. S. 24A be deleted from the records. This includes a spur connection south of Monroe and one just north of Flat Rock. |
| The section of U. S. 24A between the Michigan-Ohio State line has been constructed and marked as Interstate Route 75 and it is desired that all U. S. 24A markers on that route be removed and that portion of U. S. 24A be deleted from the records. This includes a spur connection south of Monroe and one just north of Flat Rock. ||
| APPROVED | U. S. 25 Relocation | This routing will be over present U. S. 24 from the Michigan-Ohio State line northward to present junction of U. S. 24 and 25 north of Monroe. Present U. S. 25 is to be dropped from the State Trunk Highway system. Also, beginning at the junction of present U. S. 25 and M-29 north of Mt. Clemens, thence east to Interstate Route 94, thence northerly with I-94 to north junction of U. S. 25 A and present U. S. 25 north of Port Huron. A portion of U. S. 2S A between the north junction of present U. S. 25A and M-51 north to present U. s. 25 is being deleted from the records. ​ |
| APPROVED | U. S. 25 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route | This routing would be over present U. S. 25A from its south junction with M-51 southeasterly to former U. S. 25, thence through Port Huron on former U. S. 25 to the junction with I-94 (present U. S. 25) south of Port Huron. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 27 Relocation | This routing in the vicinity of Charlotte will be over a high type facility bypassing the city on the east side, beginning a short distance south of the city limits and extending northerly to a junction with present U.S. 27. Also, beginning just south of Ithaca, thence northerly over a new high type facility via Alma, St. Louis, bypassing Mt. Pleasant on the east side, also Clare on the east and north sides, Harrison on the east side, to a junction with Interstate Route 75 and present U. S. 27 south of Grayling. Also, beginning at the south edge of Grayling at the interchange with present U. S. 27, I-75 and M-72, thence northerly along the east side of Grayling with I-75 to present U. S. 27 at Indian River. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 27 B. R. Recognition of Business Route | This routing would be over former U. S. 27 through Charlotte from the junction south of town of present U. S. 27 to the junction of the present U. S. 27 northeast of the city. Also, over former U. S. Route 27 through the town of Ithaca. Also, over U. S. Route 27A through the town of Alma and over former U.S. Route 27 through the town of St. Louis. Another section through the town of Mt. Pleasant over former U. S. Route 27. Also, through the town of Clare over a spur connection on the south side of town to former U. S. 27, thence over former U. S. 27 to a junction with present U. S. 27 north of town. Also, over former U. S. 27 through the town of Harrison. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 31 Relocation | This routing begins south of Benton Harbor at the junction of present U.S. 31 and M-139, thence over M-139 to I-94, thence over I-94 northerly to interchange with I-96 northeast of Benton Harbor, thence northerly with I-96 to the junction of present U. S. 31, U.S. 31 B.R. and I-96 south of Holland. Also, beginning south of Muskegon Heights at the junction of present U. S. 31 and a new high type facility just north of M-104 intersection, thence northerly to I-196 and U. S. 16. Also, beginning north of Muskegon at a junction with a new high type facility, thence northerly by-​passing Whitehall and Montague on the east side to present U. S. 31 north of Montague. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 31 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route | This routing will be over former U. S. 31 from the junction of M-139 south of Benton Harbor, northwest through St. Joseph, thence easterly through Benton Harbor on U. S. 12 and a new connection to I-94 east of the east junction of U. S. 12 and M-139, Also, beginning south of Muskegon Heights at the junction of present U. S. 31 and I-196, thence northwest and north with I-196 to junction in Muskegon with M-46, thence northerly overlapping present U. S. 31 B. R. to junction with present U. S. 31 B. R. and former U. S. 31, thence east to present U. S. 31. The sections of former U. S. 31 B. R. in Muskegon Heights and Muskegon chat are not on the new route layout for that area are to be deleted from the record. Also, beginning east of Whitehall at the junction of former U. S. 31 and present U,. S. 31, thence west and north over former U. S, 31, through Whitehall and Montague to a new spur connection to present U. S. 31 north of Montague. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 33 Extension | This routing would begin in the city of St. Joseph at the present terminus of U. S. 33 and extend northeasterly over former U. S. 31 to present U. S. 31 and Interstate Route 96 north of St Joseph, a distance of 11 miles. |
| APFROVED | U. S. 127 Relocation | This routing is over a high type facility beginning southeast of Jackson at a junction of present U. S. 127 and proposed U. S. 127 north of the junction with 50 thence northerly to Interstate Route 94, thence west with I-94 to junction with preset U. S. 127. |
| APPROVED | U. B. 127 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route | Beginning at the junction of present U. S. 127 and former U. S. 127 southeast of Jackson, thence along the routing of former U. S. 127 through Jackson to present U. S. 127 and I-94 near the northwest corner of Jackson. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 131 Relocation | This routing would begin south of Kalamazoo at a junction of present U.S. 131 and a high type facility, thence north bypassing Kalamazoo on the west side through Grand Rapids to I-196, thence east with I-196 to U.S. 131 B.R., thence northeast to present 131. ​ |
| APPROVED | U. S. 131 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route | This routing would begin at the west edge of Kalamazoo at the junction of present U.S. 131 and former U. S. 12, thence east, north and northwest through Kalamazoo to a junction with present U. S. 131 northwest of the city. Also, a short section at the south edge of Grand Rapids beginning at the junction of present U. S. 131 and M-50, thence east with M-50 to present U. S. 131 B. R. A short section of U. S. 131 B. R. north of Grand Rapids overlapped by present U. S. 131 from I-196 to former U. S. 131 is to be deleted from the records. |
| MONTANA | U. S. 12 Relocation (Revised Submission) | This routing would follow State Route 6 westerly from Forsyth via Melstone, Roundup, Ryegate, Harlowton and White Sulpher Springs to Townsend, thence northwesterly with U. S. 10N via Helena to Garrison, thence westerly with U. S. 10 via Drummond to Missoula. |
| This routing would follow State Route 6 westerly from Forsyth via Melstone, Roundup, Ryegate, Harlowton and White Sulpher Springs to Townsend, thence northwesterly with U. S. 10N via Helena to Garrison, thence westerly with U. S. 10 via Drummond to Missoula. ||
| | U. S. 12 A Establishment of an Alternate U. S. Route (Revised Submission) | This routing would follow present U. S. Route 12 from Forsyth southwesterly via Hysham, Billings, Laurel and Red Lodge into Wyoming for a few miles then back into Montana terminating at the northeast corner of the Yellowstone National Park at Cooke City. |
| This routing would follow present U. S. Route 12 from Forsyth southwesterly via Hysham, Billings, Laurel and Red Lodge into Wyoming for a few miles then back into Montana terminating at the northeast corner of the Yellowstone National Park at Cooke City. ||
| VIRGINIA APPROVED | U. S. 17 Relocation | This routing will be over a newly constructed high type highway beginning at the intersection of High Street (Present U. S. Route 17) and Fauquier Avenue running thence southeasterly a distance of 2.30 miles to present U.S. Route. 17 just north of Paradise Creek in Portsmouth. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 17 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route | This marking will begin at the intersection of High Street (former U.S. Route 17) and Fauquier Ave., thence east on High St. to Elm Ave., thence south on Elm Ave. following the route of former U.S. Route 17 to a junction with present U. S. Route 17 just north of Paradise Creek, a distance of 3.40 miles, in Portsmouth. ​ |
| OHIO APPROVED | U. S. 21 Relocation | This routing would follow a new controlled access highway bypassing the municipalities of Montrose, Copley, Loyal Oak, Barberton, Clinton and Canal Fulton between Massillion and Ghent. . |
| APPROVED | U. S. 30, 30N, 30S Relocation and deletion of section of U. S. 30N and U. S. 3OS | This routing would begin west of the City of Mansfield at the junction of U. S. 30N and U. S. 30S and will be over a new controlled access highway bypassing the municipality of Mansfield. U. S. Routes 3ON and 30S will terminate at the above mentioned junction west of Mansfield and only U. S. 30 markers vill be erected from that point eastward to present U. S. 30 at Mifflin. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 40 Relocation | This routing would be over a controlled access section (Interstate Route 70) bypassing the City of St. Clairsville from a point about 1 mile west of the city to a point about 2.7 miles east near Blaine. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 42 Relocation | This routing would be over a controlled access section bypassing the municipality of Lodi from a point about 1 mile southwest of Lodi to the northeast corner of the city at the interchange with U. S. 224. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 224 Relocation | This routing would be over a newly constructed controlled access section from Barberton westerly to a point west of Lodi, bypassing the municipalities of Wadsworth, Leroy and Lodi. |
| OHIO KENTUCKY TENNESSEE APPROVED | U. S. 127 Extension | (Ohio Section) This routing would be over an urban highway section now marked as U. S. Routes 25 and 42 in. Cincinnati crossing the Ohio River on the C &.O Bridge into Covington, Kentucky. (Kentucky Section) This routing would begin at the Kentucky-Ohio State line at Covington, thence southwesterly via Florence over U. S. 42 to junction with State Route 239, thence south on State Route 239 to Glencoe, thence over State Route 16 to U. S. 227, thence over U. S. Route 227 to Owenton, thence south over State Route 35 through Frankfort, Lawrrenceburg, Harrodsburg, Danville, Liberty, Jamestown and Albany to the Kentucky-Tennessee State line at Static. ​ (Tennessee Section) This routing would follow Tennessee State Route 28 from the Tennessee-Kentucky State linee northeast of Byrdstown southerly via Jamestown, Crossville, Pikeville to Dunlop, thence over State Route 8 via Signal Mountain and Glendale into Chattanooga terminating at junction with U. S. 41 and 64. |
| MISSOURI APPROVED | U. S. 24 Relocation | This routing would follow a newly constructed section from a point on present route east of Lexington, bypassing the City of Lexington and the towns of Wellington and Napoleon to the present route near the Lafayette-Jackson County line west of Napoleon. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 24 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route | This routing would be over former U. S. Route 24 from the intersection east of Lexington, through the City of Lexington, the towns of Wellington and Napoleon to the intersection of present U. S. 24 at the Lafayette-Jackson County line. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 40 Relocation | This routing would be over a newly constructed controlled access section (Interstate Route 70) bypassing the business area of the City of Columbia, from a point east of the junction of U. S. 63, westerly to West Boulevard. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 40 B. R. Recognition of a Business Roiute | This routing would be over former U. S. Route 40 from the interchange east of the city westerly to West Boulevard. |
| APPROVED | U. S 40 Alternate Relocation | This routing would begin at the interchange with Interstate Route 70 and Bypass U. S. 66 near Pattonville, then easterly with Interstate Route 70 to Goodfellow Avenue, thence south on Goodfellow Avenue to Natural Bridge Road, thence east on Natural Bridge Road (State Route 115) to U. S. Route 67 Kingshighway Boulevard) thence south to U. 8. 40 at east edge of Forest Park. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 40 B. R. Removal of Business Route | The section proposed to be deleted from the records is not now carried in our "U.S. Numbered Highways" listing due to the fact it was originally considered a local marking problem and was not submitted for action to the Route Numbering Committee. For the purpose of clearing any records that may have been made on maps the section to be deleted is on Page Ave., Sheridan Ave, and Cass Ave. in the City of St. Louis between Union Ave, and 12th St. Trafficway. ​ |
| APPROVED | U. S. 40 By-Pass Relocation | This routing will begin west of St. Charles at the intersection of former By-Pass U. S. 40 and run easterly with a newly constructed section of Interstate Route 70, bypassing St. Charles, to the interchange with By-Pass U. S. 66 near Pattonville, thence north with By-Pass U. S. 66 to former By-Pass U. S. 40 (also S. R. 115) at Bridgeton. Portions of present By-Pass U. S. 40 wi11 be marked S.R. 94 and S. R. 115 and a small section will be unmarked but will serve as a Frontage Road for Interstate Route 70. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 60 Relocation | This routing will be over a newly constructed section bypassing the City of Mansfield beginning about 3 miles west of Mansfield and extending about 3 miles east of the city. |
| APPROVED | U.S. 60 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route | This routing would be over former U. S. Route 60 through the City of Mansfield from a point about 1 mile west of the city limits to a point about 3 miles east of the city. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 69 Relocation | This routing will be over a newly constructed section of a controlled access highway (Interstate Route 35) bypassing the business areas of the City of Claycomo between the interchange of present U. S. 69 and Alternate U. S. 69 on the south and the interchange with U. S. 69 and S. R. 10 on the north. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 69 Alternate Extension of Route | This routing would extend the route over former U. S. 69 through Claycomo to the interchange north of the city at State Route 10. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 71 Relocation | This routing would be over a controlled access section of Interstate Route 29 between the junction with U. S. 24 1n Kansas City (Paseo and Independence Boulevards) and the interchange with present U. S. Route 71 north of Riverside, bypassing the congested areas of North Kansas City and Riverside. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 71 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route | This routing would be over city streets in Kansas City from a point south of U.S. Route 50 to U.S. Route 24 (6th Street Trafficway) former U. S. Route 71, thence west with U.S. 24 to the interchange at the south end of the A-S-B Bridge, thence northerly along the route of former U.S. Route 71 to present U.S. 71 (Interstate Route 29) north of Riverside. ​ |
| MISSOURI NEBRASKA APPROVED | U. S. 136 Relocation and Extension of Route | (Missouri Section) This routing will begin in Stanberry at the junction of present U. S. Route 136 and State Route 4, thence west and north to Ravenwood, thence west over State Routes 4 and 46 to Maryville, thence north and west over State Route 4 via Wilcox, Burlington Junction, Tarkio, Rock Port and Phelpss City to the Nebraska-Missouri State line on the Brownsville Bridge spanning the Missouri River, a total distance in Missouri of 75.8 miles. (The portion of U. S. Route 136 in Missouri now marked from Stanberry to St. Joseph, Missouri over U. S. Route 169 is to be discontinued and markers removed on this section which is approximately 41.3 miles in length). (Nebraska Section) This routing vill be over Nebraska State Route 3 beginning at the Missouri-Nebraska State line at the Missouri River at Brownsville following Nebraska State Route 3 westward via Auburn, Tecumseh, Beatrice, Pairbury, Deshler, Red Cloud, Franklin, Alma, Orleans and Oxford to U. S. Route 6 north of Edison, a distance of approximately 29.5 miles. |
| SOUTH CAROLINA APPROVED | U. S. 29 Relocation | This routing would be over existing Alternate U. S. Route 29 from the North Carolina State line northeast of Blacksburg, southwesterly through Blacksburg, Gaffney, Cowpens, Spartanburg to the intersection with present U. S. Route 29 and Alternate U. S. Route 29 in Lyman, a distance of approximately 33 miles. The Alternate U. S. Route 29 markers would be removed from this section. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 76 Relocation | This routing would be over sections of Interstate Routes 126 and 26 beginning at the junction of Interstate Route 126 and present U. S. Route 76 near the intersection of Main Street and Elmwood Avenue in Columbia, thence running northwesterly approximately 3 miles to Interstate Route 26 thence continue northwesterly with Interstate Route 26 to a junction with present U. S. Routes 76 and 176 north of Irmo, a distance of approximately 7.5 miles. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 276 Relocation | This routing will leave present U. S. Route 276 about two miles southeast of Fountain Inn and will follow a recently constructed controlled access facility in a southeasterly direction passing north of Gray Court and Laurens and terminating at an intersection with Interstate Route 26 approximately 3 miles north of Clinton. The markings on present U. S. Route ​276 from the beginning of this relocation into Laurens will be removed and that section of former U. S. Route 276 will be marked as South Carolina State Route 14. |
| UTAH ARIZONA APPROVED | U. S. 89 Relocation | (Utah Section) The proposed marking for this route would begin in Kanab, Utah at the junction of present U. S. Route 89 and extend easterly over Utah Route Route 259 a distance of approximately 64 miles to the Arizona State line north of Glen Canyon Dam. (Arizona Section) This routing will follow a recently constructed high type highway from present U. S. 89 at Bitter Springs northerly, crossing the Colorado River at the new Glen Canyon Bridge, thence continuing northwesterly to the Arizona-Utah State line, a distance of approximately 34 miles. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 89 Alternate Establishment of an Alternate U. S. Route | (Utah Section) This routing will follow former U. S. Route 89 from Kanab, Utah south to the Utah-Arizona State line. (Arizona Section) This routing will follow former U. 8. Route 89 from Bitter Springs via Marble Canyon, Jacob Lake and Fredonia to the Arizona-Utah State line north of Fredonia. |
| NEVADA APPROVED | U. S. 95 Relocation | This routing which is through a complete new area between U. S. Route 40, 23 miles west of Lovelock and Fallon, is 32.8 miles in length and extends practically due south from the above mentioned junction with U.S. 40 to Fallon. |
| | U. S. 95 Alternate Establisment of an Alternate U. S. Route | This routing will follow former U. S. Route 95 and present U. S. Route 40 from a point 23 miles west of Lovelock southwesterly via Hot Springs to Fernley Junction. Thence in a southeasterly direction via Hasen to Fallon (present U. S. Route 95), a distance of approximately 61.4 miles. |
| Approval withheld pending further study and justification. ​ ||
| CALIFORNIA APPROVED | U. S. 6 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route (in Los Angeles) | This routing will follow present location of U. S. Route 6 along Figueroa Street between Manchester Avenue (State Route 10) and the Pacific Coast Highway (Alternate U. S. 101) in the City of Los Angeles. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 99 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route (in Dunamuir) | This routing will follow present location of U. S. Route 99 from the North Dunsmuir interchange on the freeway just south of the Sacramento River Bridge in northeast Dunsmuir, thence southerly through Dunsmuir to the south Dunsmuir interchange. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 99 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route (Los Angeles, Glendale, Burbank, San Fernando) | This routing will follow present location of U. S. Route 99 from an interchange at the junction of the Pasadena Freeway in the City of Los Angeles northwesterly through Glendale, Burbank, and San Fernando to an interchange with the Golden State Freeway at its junction near Foothill Blvd., a distance of approximately 22.4 miles. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 101 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route (Ventura) | This routing would follow present U. S. 101 through Ventura between Telephone Road interchange west of the city and the interchange east of the Ventura River. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 101 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route (Pismo Beach) | This routing will follow present location of U. S. Route 101 through Pismo Beach on Price Street which also serves as a frontage road to the full freeway with controlled access, located parallel to the present U. S. Route 101 in Pismo Beach. The markers will be maintained by the City of Pismo Beach. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 101 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route (in Los Angeles) | This routing will follow present location of U. S. Route 101 along Ventura Blvd. in Los Angeles from Vineland Avenue to an intersection with the Ventura Freeway in the Woodland Hills District. Local authorities will maintain the business route signs on this routing, approximately 14.8 miles in length. |
| FLORIDA | U. S. 129 Relocation | This routing would be over a State Route from east of Branford to Live Oak, which until June 1958 was originally U. S. 129. Present U. S. 129 between Branford and Live Oak will be assigned a State Route number. |
| This routing would be over a State Route from east of Branford to Live Oak, which until June 1958 was originally U. S. 129. Present U. S. 129 between Branford and Live Oak will be assigned a State Route number. ||
| | U. S. 129 Alternate Establishment of an Alternate U. S. Route | This routing would be over former U. S. 129 (present U. S. 27) at Branford, westerly 1.4 miles, thence southerly to Oldtown, thence southeasterly to present U. S. 129 at Chiefland. |
| This routing would be over former U. S. 129 (present U. S. 27) at Branford, westerly 1.4 miles, thence southerly to Oldtown, thence southeasterly to present U. S. 129 at Chiefland. ||
| ILLINOIS APPROVED | U. S. 150 Relocation | The routing would begin at an intersection with Interstate Route 74 and North Prospect Avenue in Champaign, thence east with Interstate Route 74, a distance of 33 miles to U. S. Route 45, thence southerly with U. S. Route 45, a distance of 1.2 miles to the junction of present U. S. Route 150 and U. S. Route 45 in Urbana. |
| APPROVED | U. S. 150 B. R. Recognition of a Business Route | This routing would be over present U. S. Route 150 from the junction of present U. S. Route 150 and Interstate Route 74 on North Prospect Avenue through the Cities of Champaign and Urbana to the junction of U. S. 45 (now U. S. 150) in the eastern part of Urbana. |
| MASSACHUSETTS APPROVED | U. S. 202 Relocation | This routing would be over present U. S. Route 202 By-Pass around Athol and would eliminate the by-pass markers on the section between present U. S. 202 southwest of Athol and Phillipston. |
| NORTH CAROLINA APPROVED | U. S. 276 Extension of a U. S. Route | Proposed marking would extend present U. S. Route 276 from its junction with U. S. Routes 23 and 194 in Waynesville northerly over State Route 284 to a new terminal point on U. S. Route 19 between Dellwood and Lake Junaluska. |
| MARYLAND DELAWARE APPROVED | U. S. 301 Relocation | (Maryland Section) This routing will begin at the present junction of U. S. 301 and U. S. 50 (Annapolis-Washington Expressway), thence easterly with U. S. 50 via Annapolis, crossing the Chesapeake Bay Bridge to the junction of Maryland State Route 71, thence over State Route 71 northeasterly to the Maryland-Delaware State line. (A distance of 73 miles). Present U.S. 301 and U. S. 301 B. R. leading into Baltimore from U. S. 50 will be deleted from the U. S. Route Numbered system and assigned a State Route number by the Maryland State Road Commission. ​ (Delaware Section) Interim Designation This routing begins on Delaware S. R. 71. at the Delaware-Maryland State line then runs northeasterly with S. R. 71 to S. R. 299 in Middletown. Northbound traffic will be routed over S. R. 299 to U. S. 13 at Odessa, then north over U. S. 13 ending at the junction with U. S. 40 at State Road. Southbound traffic will leave U. S. 13 at junction with S. R. 71 at Tybouts Corner, then southwesterly with S. R. 71 via Red Lion, Kirkwood over a slight detour near the Chesapeake-Delaware Canal over recently constructed high level Summit Bridge and approaches thereto (part of a future location for new U. S. 301) then back to present S. R. 71 via Mt. Pleasant and Armstrong to Middletown, there joining the northbound route previously described herein. (When future plans are completed an entire new facility will be completed between the Maryland-Delaware State line southwest of Middletown and Interstate 95 southeast of Newark and Delaware proposes to switch U. S. 301 to that location). |
| VIRGINIA NORTH CAROLINA SOUTH CAROLINA GEORGIA FLORIDA | New U. S. Route | (Virginia Section) This routing would begin at the west city limits of Richmond on U. S. 360, thence southwesterly with U. S. 360 to Virginia State Route 49, thence southerly via Creve, The Falls, Victoria, Chase City, Clarkeville and Virgilina to the North Carolina State line. (North Carolina Section) This routing would begin at the Virginia State line on North Carolina State Route 49, thence southwesterly via Roxboro, Carr, Graham, Liberty, Ramseur, Farmer, Harrisburg, Charlotte to the South Carolina State line southwest of Charlotte. (South Carolina Section) This routing would begin at the South Carolina State line at South Carolina State Route 49, thence southwesterly via York, Sharon, Bullock Creek, Lockhart to Union, thence over U. S. 176 southerly via Whitmire to State Route 19, thence southerly via Helena, Newberry, Saluda, Johnston to U. S. 29 at Trenton, thence southerly with U. S. 25 to the Georgia State line at Augusta. |
| (Virginia Section) This routing would begin at the west city limits of Richmond on U. S. 360, thence southwesterly with U. S. 360 to Virginia State Route 49, thence southerly via Creve, The Falls, Victoria, Chase City, Clarkeville and Virgilina to the North Carolina State line. (North Carolina Section) This routing would begin at the Virginia State line on North Carolina State Route 49, thence southwesterly via Roxboro, Carr, Graham, Liberty, Ramseur, Farmer, Harrisburg, Charlotte to the South Carolina State line southwest of Charlotte. (South Carolina Section) This routing would begin at the South Carolina State line at South Carolina State Route 49, thence southwesterly via York, Sharon, Bullock Creek, Lockhart to Union, thence over U. S. 176 southerly via Whitmire to State Route 19, thence southerly via Helena, Newberry, Saluda, Johnston to U. S. 29 at Trenton, thence southerly with U. S. 25 to the Georgia State line at Augusta. ||
| | | (Georgia Section) This routing would begin at the South Carolina State line in Augusta on U. S. 25. thence south and west with U. S. 25 to U. S. 278, thence west with U. S. 278 to Warrenton, thence southwesterly on Georgia State Route 16 to BSparta, thence southwest on S. R. 22 to S. R. 24 east of Milledgeville, thence West on S. R. 24 to S. R. 49 in Milledgeville, thence southwesterly on S. R. 49 via Macon, Byron, Fort Vally, Marshallville, Montezuma, Oglethorpe and Andersonville to S. R. 3 in Americus, thence south with S. R. 3 via Smithville, Leesburg, Albany and Baconton to S.R. 112 in Camilla, thence southerly with S. R. 112 to S. R. 111 in Cairo, thence soutwesterly with S. R. 111 via Reno to the Florida state line at Darcy south of Calvary. (Florida Section) This routing would begin at the Georgia State line on U. S. 27 at Darcy thence southerly to Florida State Route 12 at Havana, thence westerly with S. R. 12 via Littman, Quincy and Greensboro to S. R. 20 at Bristol, thence west with S. R. 20 to S. R. 71 in Blountstown, thence southerly with S. R. 71 to S. R. 22 at Wewahitchka, thence west with S. R. 22 to Panama City, Florida. |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) between 1929 and 1977 (inclusive) without a copyright notice.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse