OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Bailie Nicol Jarvie's journey to Aberfoil/Bailie Nicol Jarvie's journey to Aberfoil

BAILIE NICOL JARVIE'S JOURNEY TO
ABERFOIL AIR—Quaker's Wife
You may talk o' your Wallace, and talk o' your Bruce And talk o' your fechting Red Reiver; But whar will you find a great man o' sic use As a thorough-bred Saut-Market weaver? Let ance Nicol Jarvie come under your view, At hame whar the people adore me; Wher they made me a bailie, and counsellor too, Like my father, the deacon, before me. The clavering chiels, in the clachan hard by, They'll no gie a body but hard words: My faith! they shall find, if again they will try, A het poker's as guide as their braid swords. "It's as weel though to let that flea stick fast to the wa';" For mayhap the may chance to claymore me; To let "sleepin' dogs lie" is the best thing ava', Said my father, the deacon, before me. My poor cousin Rab, an' his terrible wife, Was sae proud that she chose to disowa me; ​Feint a bodle cared she for a magistrate's life, My consciences slie was just gaun to drown me. If again in her clutches I ever should pop, Poor Matty may live to deplore me; But were I at Glasgow, I'd stick by my shop, Like my father, the deacon, before me. Now to think o them hanging a bailie so high, To be picked at by corbies and burdies; Had I them at Glasgow, my conscience! I'd try How their craigs stood the weight o' their hurdies. But stop, Nicol, stop, man na, that maunna be For if some ane to hame wad restore ye, In the Saut-Market safe, ye'd forget and forgie, Like your father, the deacon, before ye. In favour o' Matty a word let me say, Of Lunnun quean's she's worth a dozen; Through the foul paths o' darkness she leads me the way, Though of Limmerfield she's the Laird's cousin. To match wi' my Matry I'm no that aboon, And young Nicol I shall adore him, If he to his friends but as gratefu' do prove As his father, the bailie, before him.
# Bailey v. Patterson (368 U.S. 346)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
368 U.S. 346
Bailey v. Patterson
Argued: Dec. 18, 1961. ---
This is a motion for an injunction to stay the prosecution of a number of criminal cases in the courts of Mississippi pending an appeal to this Court from the judgment of a three-judge Federal District Court. 199 F.Supp. 595. A federal injunction to stay state criminal proceedings is an extraordinary remedy. Cf. Douglas v. City of Jeannette, 319 U.S. 157, 63 S.Ct. 877, 87 L.Ed. 1324; Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 28 S.Ct. 441, 52 L.Ed. 714. In addition to the considerations normally attending an application for such relief, a serious question of standing is presented on this motion, in that it appears that the movants themselves are not being prosecuted in the Mississippi courts. On the record before us the motion for a stay injunction pending appeal is denied.
Motion denied.
Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER concur in the denial of a stay solely on the ground that the three movants are the themselves being prosecuted or threatened with prosecutions in Mississippi and they therefore reach no other questions.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bailey v. Patterson (369 U.S. 31)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
369 U.S. 31
Bailey v. Patterson
Argued: Feb. 26, 1962. ---
Constance Baker Motley, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and R. Jess Brown, for appellants.
Dugas Shands and Edward L. Cates, Asst. Attys. Gen. of Mississippi, and Charles Clark, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee Patterson.
Thomas H. Watkins, for appellee City of Jackson, Mississippi, and others.
Junior O'Mara, for appellee Greyhound Corp. and others.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bailie Nicol Jarvie's journey to Aberfoil

Bailie Nicol Jarvie's
JOURNEY TO ABERFOIL.
To which are added,
ST. PATRICK WAS A GENTLEMAN.
AND
THE AULD SARK SLEEVE.
GLASGOW: Printed by and for J. Neil, 17, Bazar.
1829.
* Bailie Nicol Jarvie's journey to Aberfoil
* St. Patrick was a gentleman
* The Auld Lark Sleeve
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bailey v. Patterson (368 U.S. 346)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
368 U.S. 346
Bailey v. Patterson
Argued: Dec. 18, 1961. ---
Constance Baker Motley, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and R. Jess Brown, for movants.
Joe T. Patterson, Atty. Gen. of Mississippi, Charles Clark and Peter M. Stockett, Special Asst. Attys. Gen., and Dugas Shands and Edward L. Cates, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondents Patterson and others.
Thomas H. Watkins, for respondents City of Jackson and others.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene and Howard A. Glickstein, for the United States, as amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bailey v. Sanders

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
228 U.S. 603
Bailey v. Sanders
Argued: 30, 1913. --- Decided: May 12, 1913
Mr. Douglas W. Bailey, in propria persona, and Mr. Henry H. Gilfrey for appellant.
No brief was filed for appellee.
Mr. Justice Van Devanter delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Battle of the Boyn, o(r), King William crosing (sic) the Boyn Water

THE
Battle of the Boyn;
O,
KING WILLIAM crosing
the Boyn Water.
Giving a full Description of that Bloody Battle, fought on the first of July, 1690.
TO WHICH IS ADDED,
THE
Battle of Rosline
FOUGHT ON THE
Plains of Rosline, 1303
Edinburgh: Printed by J. Morren.
* The Battle of the Boyn
* The Battle of Rosline
* The Sweet Little Girl That I Love
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Battle of the Boyn, o(r), King William crosing (sic) the Boyn Water/The Sweet Little Girl That I Love

The SWEET LITTLE GIRL that I LOVE.
MY friends all declare that my time is mispent While in rural retirement I rove: I ask no move wealth than dame Fortune has sent But the sweet little girl that I love. The role on her cheeks may delight, She's soft as the down on the dove; No lily was ever so white, As the sweet little girl that I love. The, &c.
Though humble my lot, calm content gild the scene, For my fair one delights in the grave; And a palace I'd quite for a dance on the green With the sweet little girl hat I love. The, &c.
No ambition I'd know but call her my own, No fame but be praise wish to prove: My happiness centers in Fanny alone, She's the sweet little girl that I love the &c.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Battle of the Boyn, or, King William crossing the Boyn Water (1)

THE
Battle of the Boyn;
OR,
King William croſſing the
BOYN WATER.
Giving a full Deſcription of that
bloody Fight, fought on the
firſt of July, 1690.
To which are added,
The VIRGIN'S CHOICE.
Let Ambition Fire the MIND.
TARRY WOO.
Entered according to Order.
* Battle of the Boyn, or, King William crossing the Boyn Water
* The Virgin's Choice
* Let Ambition Fire thy Mind
* Tarry Woo
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Battle of the Boyn, or, King William crossing the Boyn Water (1)/Let Ambition Fire thy Mind

Let AMBITION FIRE thy MIND.
LE T ambition fire thy mind, thou wert born o'er men to reign, Not to follow flocks deſign'd; ſcorn thy crook, and leave the plain.
​ Crowns I'll throw beneath thy feet,
thou on necks of kings ſhall tread; Joys incircling, joys ſhall meet, which way e'er thy fancy lead.
Let not ſpoils of empire fright; toils of empire pleaſure are: Thou ſhalt only know delight, all the joy, but not the care.
Shepherd, if thou'lt yield the prize, for the bleſſings I beſtow, Joyful I'll aſcend the ſkies, happy thou ſhalt reign below.
# Battle of Waterloo (diary accounts)/Visit to the French hospitals

Visit to the French hospitals.
Beyond the citadel is the Corderie, a building constructed by Buonaparte, as a rope-work, 1300 feet long, to give space for a cable of a first-rate ship of war. It was fitted up as the hospital of about 1500 of his wounded soldiers, prisoners of war.
​The whole immense length of this place was open, and the beds were arranged in four rows, from end to end. We walked generally unnoticed by their occupiers, up and down the lanes between; and equally disregarded, frequently stept over a bed, or passed between two, when going from one passage to another. It was impossible to imagine two aspects of human lot more strikingly contrasted, yet more forcibly associated, than the spectacle which these unfortunate enthusiasts presented now, and their confidence and fury but yesterday; their submissive tranquillity in their flannel gowns and caps in the hospital, and their noise and cuirasses in the field.
Death was at work here, more manifestly than we had observed among the English wounded. One man was pointed out who had tossed his amputated arm in the air, with a feeble shout of “vive l’Emperuer.” Another, at the moment of the preparations to take off his leg, declared that there was something he knew of that would cure him on the spot, and save his limb and the operators trouble. When asked to explain this strange remark, he said “a sight of the Emperorǃ" The indispensible amputation did not save him, he died in the surgeon’s hands; and his last words, stedfastly looking on his own blood, were, that he would cheerfully shed the last drop in his veins for the great Napoleon! A singularly wild, and almost poetic, fancy, was the form in which a third bore his testimony; he was undergoing, with great steadiness, the operation of the extraction of a ball from his side, and it happened to be the left; in the moment of his greatest suffering, he exclaimed, “an inch deeper, and you’ll find the Emperor.”
FINIS.
# Boston Massacre (Macaulay)

May 9, 1770. Google Books
BOSTON MASSACRE.
Gentlemen
I think my self much honored by the Town of Boston for the compliment of transmiting the Narrative relative to the massacre perpetrated by the military on the fifth of March
In condoling with you on that melancholy event your friends find a considerable alleviation in the opportunity it has given you of exhibiting a rare and admirable instance of patriotic resentment tempered with forbearance and the warmth of Courage with the coolness of Discretion
Believe me Gentlemen there is not a Bostonian the spectator of the bloody scene who feels more sensibly than my self the horrid transaction
Every service which is in my power to perform the Town of Boston may command and may depend upon a faithful and ardent execution
I am Gentlemen
    Your very obed
       And very Humble Servt
          Catharine Macaulay
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Boston Metals Company v. The Winding Gulf/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Frankfurter Douglas
United States Supreme Court
349 U.S. 122
Boston Metals Company v. The Winding Gulf
Argued: March 1, 1955. --- Decided: May 16, 1955
The petitioner, Boston Metals Company, brought this suit in admiralty against the steam vessel Winding Gulf and her owners to recover for loss of its obsolete destroyer which sank after colliding with the Winding Gulf. The collision occurred while the destroyer was being towed by the tug Peter Moran; the destroyer itself was without power or crew. The owners of the Winding Gulf filed a cross-libel against petitioner, charging that the collision was due to unseaworthiness of the destroyer. After hearings, the District Court found that the collision was due to negligent navigation by the Winding Gulf, to inadequate lights on the destroyer and absence of a crew on the destroyer to keep its lights brightly burning. This absence of lights and crew the District Court found was the fault of the master of the tug Peter Moran. The tug master's negligence, however, was imputed to the petitioner because of provisions in the towage contract that the master and crew of the tug would become the servants of the petitioner and that the towing company would not be responsible for their negligent towage. On this basis, the District Court entered a decree in favor of the cross-libellant against petitioner which resulted in dividing the damages equally between petitioner and respondents. 72 F.Supp. 50. The Court of Appeals affirmed on the same grounds. 209 F.2d 410. We granted certiorari. 348 U.S. 811, 75 S.Ct. 26.
In Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp., 349 U.S. 85, 75 S.Ct. 629, we held invalid a contract designed to shift responsibility for a towboat's negligence from the towboat to its innocent tow. That holding controls this case. For whatever this contract said, here as in the Bisso case, the persons who conducted these towing operations were in fact acting as employees of the towing company, not as employees of the owner of the tow. Under these circumstances it was error to hold petitioner liable for negligence of the towing company's employees. Cf. The Adriatic, 30 T.L.R. 699.
Reversed.
Mr. Justice HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Boston Sand Gravel Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
278 U.S. 41
Boston Sand Gravel Company v. United States
Argued: Oct. 18, 1928. --- Decided: Nov 19, 1928
Messrs. John W. Davis, of New York City, and Foye M. Murphy, of Boston, Mass., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 42-45 intentionally omitted]
The Attorney General and Mr. Farnham, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United states.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Boston Metals Company v. The Winding Gulf

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinions

    Frankfurter
    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
349 U.S. 122
Boston Metals Company v. The Winding Gulf
Argued: March 1, 1955. --- Decided: May 16, 1955
Mr. John H. Skeen, Jr., Baltimore, Md., for petitioner.
Mr. Charles S. Bolster, Boston, Mass., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Boston Store of Chicago v. American Graphophone Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
246 U.S. 8
Boston Store of Chicago v. American Graphophone Company
Argued: Jan. 16, 1918. --- Decided: March 4, 1918
[Syllabus from pages 8-9 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Walter Bachrach, Hamilton Moses, and Joseph W. Moses, all of Chicago, Ill., for Boston Store of Chicago.
Messrs. Elisha K. Camp, of New York City, Daniel N. Kirby, of St. Louis, Mo., James M. Beck, of New York City, and Taylor E. Brown and Clarence E. Mehlhope, both of Chicago, Ill., for American Graphophone Co.
[Argument of Council on pages 9-16 intentionally omitted.]
Mr. Chief Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Botanical Gazette

Volumes 2 through 152 of the Botanical Gazette were published during the years 1876 through 1991 by the University of Chicago Press. Volume 1 was printed monthly under the title Botanical Bulletin from November 1875 through October 1876. But starting with the November 1876 issue (Vol. 2, No. 1), the name was changed to Botanical Gazette to avoid any potential conflicts with the existing Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. Beginning in 1992 the title Botanical Gazette was changed to International Journal of Plant Sciences. :
| Botanical Bulletin. Volume 1. | November 1875 | – | October 1876 |
| Botanical Gazette. Volume 2. | November 1876 | – | October 1877 |
| Botanical Gazette. Volume 3. | January 1878 | – | December 1878 |
| Botanical Gazette. Volume 4. | January 1879 | – | December 1879 |
| Botanical Gazette. Volume 5. | January 1880 | – | December 1880 |
| Botanical Gazette. Volume 6. | January 1881 | – | December 1881 |
| Botanical Gazette. Volume 7. | January 1882 | – | December 1882 |
| Botanical Gazette. Volume 8. | January 1883 | – | December 1883 |
| Botanical Gazette. Volume 9. | January 1884 | – | December 1884 |
| Botanical Gazette. Volume 10. | January 1885 | – | December 1885 |
| Botanical Gazette. Volume 11. | January 1886 | – | December 1886 |
| Botanical Gazette. Volume 40. | July 1905 | – | December 1905 |
| Botanical Gazette. Volume 49. | January 1910 | – | June 1910 |
# Botanical Gazette/V09
## Articles

* "Schweinitz and American Hepaticae" by Lucien Marcus Underwood, (1884), p. 63.
# Bosworth v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
174 U.S. 182
Bosworth v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis
The facts in this case are briefly these: On September 21, 1893, the Mercantile Trust Company, of New York, filed its bill of complaint in the circuit court of the United States for the Southern district of Illinois against the Chicago, Peoria & St. Louis Railway Company, praying foreclosure of a mortgage and the appointment of a receiver. On the same day an order was entered appointing the present appellant receiver of that road. Among other things, the order of appointment directed the receiver to pay 'all claims for materials and supplies which have been incurred in the operation and maintenance of said property during the six months last past, and all ticket trackage traffic balances due from said railroad.' The plaintiff, the Mercantile Trust Company, objected to this part of the order, but, after argument, the objection was overruled. On May 27, 1895, the Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis filed an intervening petition, claiming that it had performed labor and furnished materials for the defendant railroad company within the six months named in the order of appointment. The receiver answered, denying the claim. The matter was referred to a master, who found in favor of the petitioner, and on July 30, 1896, the following decree was entered:
'It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed by the court that the receiver herein pay to the intervener, the Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis, the said sum of eight thousand one hundred and sixty-two dollars and eleven cents ($8,162.11) out of the income of said receivership, if any such income is in his hands, and, in case he has not the funds in hand for this purpose, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the same be paid out of the proceeds of the sale of the mortgaged premises in preference to the mortgage debt, and until paid the same is hereby declared a lien upon the said mortgaged estate superior to the lien of the mortgage herein.'
The receiver appealed from this decree to the court of appeals, but on June 8, 1897, that court dismissed the appeal. 53 U.S. App. 302, 26 C. C. A. 279, and 80 Fed. 969. Thereafter a certiorari was issued, and under that writ the case was brought to this court.
Bluford Wilson and P. B. Warren, for petitioner.
J. E. McKeighan, Shepard Barclay, Millard F. Watts, and S. P. Wheeler, for respondent.
Mr. Justice BREWER, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Botanical Gazette/V07/Equisetum variegatum, Schleich.

Published in the Botanical Gazette, Vol. 7 (1882), pp. 76.
Equisetum variegatum, Schleich. — Mrs. A. E. Bush, of San Jose, Cal., has sent me specimens of an Equisetum, collected at the hills near that city, April 22, which must be referred to the above species.  The stalks are densely tufted, and the grooves of the stem vary from 5 to 10, but are commonly 6 or 7; one large stalk had 11.  This species is not mentioned in the "Botany of California" and to my knowledge has not been reported from this state hitherto.  It appears in Colorado (Porter and Coulter), and from Ill. to N. H., and northward. — Lucien M. Underwood, Wesl. Univ., Bloomington, Ill.
# Bosworth v. Carr, Ryder & Engler Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
179 U.S. 444
Bosworth v. Carr, Ryder & Engler Company
Argued: October 24, 25, 1899. --- Decided: December 17, 1900
Messrs. Bluford Wilson and Philip Barton Warren for petitioner.
Messrs. Burton Hanson, George R. Peck, and George P. Cary for respondent.
Mr Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse