OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Statement from Deputy National Security Advisor for Cyber & Emerging Technologies Anne Neuberger on New Microsoft Exchange Patches

Published 2021-04-13, link in the original.
Cybersecurity is a top priority for the Biden Administration and we’re committed to sharing actionable and timely information to help the American public operate safely online.
Microsoft released a set of Exchange patches today that are critical. We urge all owners and operators of Microsoft Exchange Servers to apply these latest patches immediately. The U.S. Government will lead by example – we are requiring all agencies to immediately patch their Exchange servers, as well. Should these vulnerabilities evolve into a major incident, we will manage the incident in partnership with the private sector, building on the Unified Coordination Group processes established and exercised in the recent Microsoft Exchange incident.
The U.S. government discovered and notified Microsoft on these vulnerabilities. The U.S. Government carefully weighs the national security, public, and commercial interests in deciding to disclose a vulnerability. Moreover, we recognize when vulnerabilities may pose such a systemic risk that they require expedited disclosure. This disclosure is an example of the responsible and transparent approach the U.S. government uses when handling vulnerabilities. This is consistent with our expectations for how responsible governments and companies can work together to promote cybersecurity.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Statement from Jeff Zients, White House COVID-19 Response Coordinator on Johnson & Johnson Vaccine

Published 2021-04-13
As FDA and CDC announced earlier today, out of an abundance of caution, they have recommended a pause in the use of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine as they review data involving six reported U.S. cases of a rare and severe type of blood clot in individuals after receiving the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. The FDA and CDC will be providing details at their briefing later this morning.
This announcement will not have a significant impact on our vaccination plan: Johnson & Johnson vaccine makes up less than 5 percent of the recorded shots in arms in the United States to date. Based on actions taken by the President earlier this year, the United States has secured enough Pfizer and Moderna doses for 300 million Americans. Over the last few weeks, we have made available more than 25 million doses of Pfizer and Moderna each week, and in fact this week we will make available 28 million doses of these vaccines. This is more than enough supply to continue the current pace of vaccinations of 3 million shots per day, and meet the President’s goal of 200 million shots by his 100th day in office—and continue on to reach every adult who wants to be vaccinated. We are working now with our state and federal partners to get anyone scheduled for a J&J vaccine quickly rescheduled for a Pfizer or Moderna vaccine.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Statement from Acting OMB Director Robert Fairweather Budgetary Impact Analysis for Executive Order Entitled “Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation”

Published 2021-01-20, cf. Executive Order on Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation
January 20, 2021
Statement from Acting OMB Director Robert Fairweather
Budgetary Impact Analysis for Executive Order Entitled “Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation”
This executive order requires all agencies to review all existing orders, regulations, guidance documents, policies, programs or other actions that discriminate against individuals on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation. Agencies are required to combat these and overlapping forms of discrimination such as on the basis of race or disability. Implementing this executive order would have no impact on costs and revenues to the Federal Government. The benefits of this executive order include preventing and combating discrimination and fully enforcing Title VII and other laws that prohibit discrimination based on the basis of gender identify or sexual orientation. Implementing this executive order would have no impact on mandatory and discretionary obligations and outlays, as well as on revenues to the Federal Government, in the 5-year fiscal period beginning in fiscal year 2021. The agencies anticipated to be impacted by this executive order include all Executive Departments and Agencies.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Statement from Acting OMB Director Robert Fairweather Budgetary Impact Analysis for Executive Order Entitled “Revocation of Certain Presidential Actions”

Published 2021-02-24, cf. Executive Order on the Revocation of Certain Presidential Actions and M-21-16 Memorandum for Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies.
February 24, 2021
Statement from Acting OMB Director Robert Fairweather
Budgetary Impact Analysis for Executive Order/Entitled “Revocation of Certain Presidential Actions”
This executive order revokes a number of Trump Administration executive actions and directs all agencies to take immediate steps, consistent with statutes, to rescind or abolish agency documents and policies, personnel positions, and task forces or other entities based on the rescinded executive actions. Implementing this executive order would have de minimis impact on costs and revenues to the Federal Government. The benefits of this executive order include ensuring that agency actions and personnel reflect current Government policies and priorities. Implementing this executive order would have de minimis impact on mandatory and discretionary obligations and outlays, as well as on revenues to the Federal Government, in the 5-year fiscal period beginning in fiscal year 2021. The agencies anticipated to be impacted by this executive order include all executive departments and agencies.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Supplemental Appropriations Act

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Supplemental Appropriations Act."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2001, Pub.L. 107−20
* 2001 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Recovery from and Response to Terrorist Attacks on the United States
* 2002 Supplemental Appropriations Act for Further Recovery From and Response To Terrorist Attacks on the United States, Pub.L. 107−206
* Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2003, Pub.L. 108−11
* Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense and for the Reconstruction of Iraq and Afghanistan, 2004, Pub.L. 108−106
* Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami Relief, 2005, Pub.L. 109−13
* Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2008
* Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009

## See also

* Consolidated Appropriations Act
* Continuing Appropriations Resolution
* Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act

## External link

* Status of Appropriations Legislation for Fiscal Year 2010, with other years linked
# Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009/Title I
## TITLE I—DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
### FOREIGN AGRICULTRAL SERVICE
#### Public Law 480 Title II Grants

       For an additional amount for “Public Law 480 Title II Grants”, $700,000,000, to remain available until expended.

### GENERAL PROVISIONS—THIS TITLE
#### SEC. 101.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, amounts made available to provide assistance under the emergency conservation program established under title IV of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 2201 and 2202) and unobligated as of the date of the enactment of this Act shall be available to the Secretary of Agriculture, until expended, for expenses under that program related to recovery efforts in response to natural disasters.

#### SEC. 102.

    (a) For an additional amount for gross obligations for the principal amount of direct and guaranteed farm ownership (7 U.S.C. 1922 et seq.) and operating (7 U.S.C. 1941 et seq.) loans, to be available from funds in the Agricultural Credit Insurance Fund, as follows: direct farm ownership loans, $360,000,000; direct operating loans, $400,000,000; and unsubsidized guaranteed operating loans, $50,201,000.
    (b) For an additional amount for the cost of direct and guaranteed loans, including the cost of modifying loans as defined in section 502 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, as follows: direct farm ownership loans, $22,860,000; direct operating loans, $47,160,000; and unsubsidized guaranteed operating loans, $1,250,000.
# Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009/Title II
## TITLE II—DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
### DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
#### Economic Development Administration

Economic Development Assistance Programs
       For an additional amount for “Economic Development Assistance Programs”, $40,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2010: Provided, That the amount provided under this heading shall be for Trade Adjustment Assistance for Communities under subchapter A, chapter 4, title II of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2371 et seq.) and Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms under chapter 3, title II of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2341 et seq.).

### DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
#### Detention Trustee

       For an additional amount for “Detention Trustee”, $60,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2010.
LEGAL ACTIVITIES

#### Salaries and Expenses, General Legal Activities

       For an additional amount for “Salaries and Expenses”, $1,648,000, to remain available until September 30, 2010.

#### Salaries and Expenses, United States Attorneys

       For an additional amount for “Salaries and Expenses”, $15,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2010.

#### Salaries and Expenses, United States Marshals Service

       For an additional amount for “Salaries and Expenses”, $10,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2010.

#### Salaries and Expenses, National Security Division

       For an additional amount for “Salaries and Expenses”, $1,389,000, to remain available until September 30, 2010.

#### Salaries and Expenses, Federal Bureau of Investigation

       For an additional amount for “Salaries and Expenses”, $35,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2010.

#### Salaries and Expenses, Drug Enforcement Administration

       For an additional amount for “Salaries and Expenses”, $20,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2010.

#### Salaries and Expenses, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives

       For an additional amount for “Salaries and Expenses”, $14,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2010.

#### Salaries and Expenses, Federal Prison System

       For an additional amount for “Salaries and Expenses”, $5,038,000, to remain available until September 30, 2010.

### GENERAL PROVISION—THIS TITLE
#### SEC. 201.

    (a) Of the funds appropriated in chapter 2 of title I of Public Law 110-252 under the heading “Office of Inspector General”, $3,000,000 is rescinded.
    (b) For an additional amount for “Office of Inspector General”, $3,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2010.

## Notes

* ↑ (Including Rescission of Funds)
# Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009/Title IX
## TITLE IX—LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
### CAPITOL POLICE
#### General Expenses

       For an additional amount for `Capitol Police, General Expenses', $71,606,000, to purchase and install a new radio system for the U.S. Capitol Police, to remain available until September 30, 2012:
          Provided, That the Chief of the Capitol Police may not obligate any of the funds appropriated under this heading without approval of an obligation plan by the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives.

### CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE
#### Salaries and Expenses

       For an additional amount for `Salaries and Expenses', $2,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2010.
# Stung Right

* "Stung Right" in Songs of the Workers (9th edition) (1916)
* "Stung Right" in Songs of the Industrial Workers of the World (4th Australian edition) (c. 1920)
# Study of an Elevation, in Indian Ink

* Kipling, Rudyard (1899, 1919), "Study of an Elevation, in Indian Ink" in Departmental Ditties and Ballads and Barrack-Room Ballads.
* Kipling, Rudyard (1919), "Study of an Elevation, in Indian Ink" in Rudyard Kipling's Verse, Inclusive Edition, 1885-1918.
# Sturdy v. Jackaway

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
71 U.S. 174
Sturdy v. Jackaway
STURDY brought ejectment against Jackaway in one of the State courts of Arkansas to recover a tract of land in that State, the action being brought not in the English fictitious form used still in some States of the Union, but in the way now more common with us-and which prevails in Arkansas-where the parties sue, as in other cases, in their true names, and where the land claimed is described so as to be capable of complete identification. Judgment was given for the defendant; and the case having gone to the Supreme Court of Arkansas the judgment was there affirmed. He then brought another ejectment for the same premises in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas, and the defendant having pleaded the former judgment the plaintiff demurred. The judges of the Circuit Court being opposed in opinion as to the sufficiency of the demurrer, the following questions were certified to the court:
1st. Is said plea good in law as a bar to this action?
2d. Is a final judgment pronounced in an action of ejectment, where the claim of title in fee simple absolute by the parties respectively was the sole subject of controversy, instituted and prosecuted under and according to the forms and in the manner prescribed by the statute laws of the State of Arkansas, a valid, legal bar to a like action, subsequently instituted between the same parties, for the same lands or premises, involving the same identical title and rights to the possession of such lands or premises, and none other?
There was nothing shown by the record or otherwise to indicate that the statute law of Arkansas made a distinction between ejectment and other actions as to the conclusiveness of a verdict and judgment.
Mr. Carlisle, with a brief of Mr. Watkins, for the defendant. No counsel contra.
Mr. Justice GRIER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sturdy v. Jackaway/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
71 U.S. 174
Sturdy v. Jackaway
The two questions certified by the court below constitute but one.
It is a well-settled principle of the common law 'that in personal actions concerning debts, goods, and effects (by way of distinction from other actions), a recovery in one action is a bar to another. This principle is not true of personal actions alone, but is equally and universally true of all actions, whatsoever quoad their subject-matter; and that an allegation on record, on which issue has been once taken and found, is, between the parties taking it and their privies, conclusive, according to the finding thereof, so as to estop the parties respectively from again litigating that fact once tried and found.'
The action of ejectment was devised for a lessee of a term of years, who was ousted of his term, and who, having but a chattel interest, could not support a real action to recover possession. It was but an action of trespass in effect, and the remedy was in damages only for the dispossession. But afterward the court determined the lessee should not only recover damages, but also his term, which soon brought the action into general use; and, by the formal scaffolding of a lease, entry, and ouster, the action was converted into a method of trying, collaterally and incidentally, the title of the lessor.
Hence, as the title of the freehold was never formally and directly is issue by the pleadings, but only a trespass committed by John Doe on Richard Roe, in forcibly expelling him from a term of years, no verdict between these parties for the supposed trespass could be pleaded in bar to another action of trespass by Thomas Troublesome on Timothy Peaceable.
It was in this way that the doctrine crept in that a verdict and judgment were conclusive only as regards personalty.
Afterwards, when this fictitious scaffolding was demolished in many States, and the parties made their issue in their own names-where there could be no difficulty as to the estoppel-the idea of a difference between rights to real property and personalty still continued in many States to linger, and a single verdict and judgment in ejectment was not considered conclusive. In such States provision was usually made by statute for a second trial.
But where no such provision has been made, the party's privilege to plead his estoppel, according to his right at common law, has always been recognized by the court. #fn-s-s
We find nothing in the statutes of Arkansas, or in their judicial decisions, making any exceptions or difference as to the conclusiveness of a verdict and judgment in real or personal action.
This question must, therefore, be answered.
IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.
# Sturges Burn Manufacturing Company v. Beauchamp

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
231 U.S. 320
Sturges Burn Manufacturing Company v. Beauchamp
Argued: November 3, 1913. --- Decided: December 1, 1913
Messrs. Almon W. Bulkley and Clair E. More for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 321-324 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. George E. Gorman and John M. Pollock for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Studley v. Boylston National Bank of Boston

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
229 U.S. 523
Studley v. Boylston National Bank of Boston
Argued: April 14, 1913. --- Decided: June 9, 1913
Messrs. J. Butler Studley, William H. Dunbar, and Stewart C. Woodworth for appellant.
Mr. Hollis R. Bailey for appellee.
Mr. Justice Lamar delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# The A.B.C. (Bradlee)

The song was first copyrighted in 1835 by the Boston-based music publisher Charles Bradlee, and given the title "The A.B.C., a German air with variations for the flute with an easy accompaniment for the piano forte". The musical arrangement was attributed to Louis Le Maire (sometimes Lemaire), an 18th-century composer. This was "Entered according to act of Congress, in the year 1835, by C. Bradlee, in the clerk's office of the District Court of Massachusetts", according to the Newberry Library, which also says, "The theme is that used by Mozart for his piano variations, Ah, vous dirai-je, maman." This tune is the same as the tune for "Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star" and "Baa, Baa, Black Sheep".
    Lyrics: (each line represents two measures, or eight beats)
    a-b-c-d-e-f-g, (/eɪ biː siː diː iː ɛf dʒiː,/)
    h-i-j-k-lmnop, (/eɪtʃ aɪ dʒeɪ keɪ ɛlɛmɛnoʊ piː,/ l-m-n-o spoken twice as quickly as rest of rhyme)
    q-r-s, t-u-v, (/kjuː ɑr ɛs, tiː juː viː,/ pause between s and t)
    w--x, y-and-z, (/dʌbɨjuː ɛks, waɪ ænd ziː,/ pause between x and y, w and x last for two beats)
    Now I know my ABCs; (/naʊ aɪ noʊ maɪ eɪ biː siːz,/)
    next time won't you sing with me? (/nɛkst taɪm woʊnt juː sɪŋ wɪθ miː/).
# The Abandoned Room

A locked-room mystery story. (Illustrations omitted). Audiobook at librivox
THE ABANDONED ROOM
BY WADSWORTH CAMP
AUTHOR OF "THE HOUSE OF FEAR" "WAR'S DARK FRAME," ETC
Illustrated by Robert McCaig
Garden City New York DOUBLEDAY, PAGE & COMPANY 1917

### CONTENTS

CHAPTER
* Katherine Hears the Sly Step of Death at the Cedars
* The Case Against Bobby
* Howells Delivers Himself to The Abandoned Room
* A Strange Light Appears at the Deserted House
* The Crying Through the Woods
* The One Who Crept in the Private Staircase
* The Amazing Meeting in the Shadows of the Old Courtyard
* What Happened at the Grave
* Bobby's Vigil in the Abandoned Room
* The Cedars Is Left to Its Shadows
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1936, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 87 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Texas Railway Company v. Southern Pacific Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
137 U.S. 48
Texas Railway Company v. Southern Pacific Railway Company
[Statement of Case from pages 48-53 intentionally omitted]
W. W. Howe and John F. Dillon, for plaintiff in error.
H. J. Leovy and J. P. Paxton Blair, for defendant in error.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Texas Railway Company v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Texas Railway Company v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Texas Railway Company v. United States (286 U.S. 285)
* Texas Railway Company v. United States (289 U.S. 627)
# Texas Railway Company v. United States (286 U.S. 285)

United States Supreme Court
286 U.S. 285
Texas Railway Company v. United States
Argued: April 14, 1932. --- Decided: May 16, 1932
Messrs. John W. Davis and Newton K. Fox, both of New York City, for petitioner.
The Attorney General and Mr. Charles B.Rugg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from page 286 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse