OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Osman v. Douds/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
339 U.S. 846
Osman v. Douds
This case was heretofore held for, and presents the same issues involved in, American Communications Association, C.I.O., et al. v. Douds, and United Steel-workers of America, et al. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1950, 339 U.S. 382, 70 S.Ct. 674. In these cases the Court upheld the constitutionality of § 9(h) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended by the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 136, 146, 29 U.S.C.Supp. III, §§ 141, 159(h), 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 141, 159(h), which provides:
'No investigation shall be made by the (National Labor Relations) Board of any question affecting commerce concerning the representation of employees, raised by a labor organization under subsection (c) of this section, no petition under subsection (e)(1) of this section shall be entertained, and no complaint shall be issued pursuant to a charge made by a labor organization under subsection (b) of section 160 of this title, unless there is on file with the Board an affidavit executed contemporaneously or within the preceding twelve-month period by each officer of such labor organization and the officers of any national or international labor organization of which it is an affiliate or constituent unit that he is not a member of the Communist Party or affiliated with such party, and that he does not believe in, and is not a member of or supports any organization that believes in or teaches, the overthrow of the United States Government by force or by any illegal or unconstitutional methods.'
With regard to that part of the section which is concerned with membership in, or affiliation with, the Communist Party, the Court holds the requirement to be constitutional. Mr. Justice BLACK dissents for reasons stated in his dissent in American Communications Association C.I.O. v. Douds, supra.
With regard to the constitutionality of other relevant parts of the section, the Court is equally divided. Mr. Justice MINTON joins in the views expressed by the CHIEF JUSTICE, who was joined by Mr. Justice REED and Mr. Justice BURTON in the cases above cited. Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER and Mr. Justice JACKSON adhere to their opinions in those cases. Mr. Justice DOUGLAS joins the dissenting opinions of Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER and Mr. Justice JACKSON insofar as they hold unconstitutional the portion of the oath dealing with beliefs, and being of the view that provisions of the oath are not separable votes to reverse. He therefore does not find it necessary to reach the question of the constitutionality of the other part of the oath. The judgment of the District Court is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.
Mr. Justice CLARK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Osborne v. Gray

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
241 U.S. 16
Osborne v. Gray
Argued: April 3, 1916. --- Decided: April 17, 1916
Messrs. William L. Frierson and Lewis M. Coleman for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 16-18 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. B. E. Tatum, P. H. Thach, Felix D. Lynch, George W. Chamlee, and Joe V. Williams for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Osborne v. County of Adams/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
109 U.S. 1
Osborne v. County of Adams
This case was decided at the last term of this court, and is reported in 106 U.S. 181; [S.C.. 1 SUP. CT. REP. 168.] We there held that a steam grist-mill was not a work of internal improvement, within the meaning of the statute of Nebraska, approved February 15, 1869, authorizing counties, cities, and precincts of organized counties 'to issue bonds to aid in the construction of any railroad or other work of internal improvement.' It was also said that the court was not justified by anything in Township of Burlington v. Beasley, 94 U.S. 310, or in the decisions of the courts of Nebraska, 'in holding that a steam or other kind of grist-mill is of the class of internal improvements which municipal townships in that state are empowered, by the statute in question, to aid by an issue of bonds.'
A petition for rehearing was filed near the close of the last term, calling our attention to the fact that the supreme court of Nebraska had then recently decided that a grist-mill operated by water-power was a work of internal improvement within the meaning of the before-mentioned statute. The judgment was suspended in order that appellee might have an opportunity of presenting the full text of the opinion of the state court. That has been done at the present term. The case to which reference is made is made is Traver v. Merrick Co. 5 N. W. Rep. 690, the opinion in which was not filed in the state court until after the close of our last term.
It is quite true, as claimed by counsel for appellee, that the state court does, in that case, rule that a water grist-mill is a work of internal improvement within the meaning of the statute in question. But the court takes care to say:
'In our view there is a clear distinction between aiding the development of the water-power of the state-a power that is continuing in its nature and may be used without cost or expense, and must be used at certain points on a stream where a dam can be erected and power obtained-and a mill propelled by steam, that must be attended with a continuous cost for fuel, and may at any time be moved to another locality.'
So far from the decision of the state court furnishing any ground for a rehearing, it is an authority in support of that construction of the act of 1867 which excludes steam grist-mills from the class of internal improvements in aid of which counties, cities, and precincts of organized counties are, by the statute, authorized to issue their bonds. The rehearing is denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Osborne v. Clark

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
204 U.S. 565
Osborne v. Clark
Argued: January 16, 1907. --- Decided: February 25, 1907
Messrs. Floyd Estill, James J. Lynch, Jesse M. Littleton, Isaac W. Crabtree, and Felix D. Lynch for plaintiffs in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 565-567 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Charles C. Trabue and William L. Granbery for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Osborne v. County of Adams in the State of Nebraska

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
106 U.S. 181
Osborne v. County of Adams in the State of Nebraska
[Syllabus on page 181 intentionally omitted]
[Statement of Case on pages 181-182 intentionally omitted]
A. H. Bowen and John H. Ames, for plaintiffs in error.
John Doniphan, for defendant in error.
HARLAN, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Osborne v. County of Adams in the State of Nebraska/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
106 U.S. 181
Osborne v. County of Adams in the State of Nebraska
A steam grist-mill is not, in our opinion, a work of internal improvement within the meaning of the statute of Nebraska, approved February 15, 1869, which authorizes counties, cities, and precincts of organized counties 'to issue bonds to aid in the construction of any railroad or other work of internal improvement.'
The case of Township of Burlington v. Beasley, 94 U.S. 312, is not, as supposed by counsel, an authority for a different conclusion. That case arose under a statute of Kansas which empowered municipal townships in that state to issue bonds 'for the purpose of building bridges, free or otherwise, or to aid in the construction of railroads or water-power, by donation thereto, or the taking of stock therein, or for other works of internal improvement.' The bonds there in suit were issued to aid in the construction and completion of, and to furnish the motive power for, a steam custom grist-mill. It was held that the statute, reasonably interpreted, embraced a grist-mill operated by steam, as well as one run by water-power; that, since municipal aid was authorized for 'the construction of * * * waterpower,' the phrase 'other works of internal improvement,' in the Kansas statute, might be fairly construed as embracing works of the same class, and consequently as embracing a steam grist-mill. The court was somewhat influenced, as plainly appears from its opinion, by decisions of the supreme court of Kansas, particularly that of Com'rs of Leavenworth Co. v. Miller, 7 Kan. 479.
The present case is different. The only work of internal improvement specially described in the Nebraska statute is that of a railroad, and we are not justified by anything in Township of Burlington v. Beasley, or in the decisions of the courts of Nebraska, in holding that a steam or other kind of grist-mill is of the class of internal improvements which municipal townships in that state were empowered, by the statute in question, to aid by an issue of bonds.
For these reasons we adjudge that the bonds issued by the county commissioners in behalf of Juniata precinct, in Adams county, Nebraska, in aid of the construction of a steam grist-mill in that precinct, are unauthorized by the act of February 15, 1869; and as authority for their issue is not claimed to exist under any other statute, they must be held to be without binding force against the precinct.
The judgment is, consequently, affirmed.
This case affirms S.C.. 7 FED. REP. 441.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Osborne v. County of Adams

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
109 U.S. 1
Osborne v. County of Adams
Adna H. Bowen and Mott Ames, for petition.
No counsel in opposition.
HARLAN, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Our Land of Dixie

Our Land of Dixie
By Leander Ker.
The Yankees muster’d all their might, And brought their army out to fight, And said our men would at the sight All fly away from Dixie. From North, and East, and West, they came, Proud of their fancied power and fame, And thought to win a nobler name By subjugating Dixie.
First in advance came Scott, the bold, A hero in the wars grown old, Who’d sell his country for base gold; He soon would conquer Dixie; But on Manassa’s bloody plain He met a storm of iron rain— All fled in fear, who wore not slain, To tell how they took Dixie.
Then Shields, Milroy, and Banks, the base, As void of honor as of grace, Came in “Old Fuss and Feathers’s” place And they would soon have Dixie; But Stonewall met them on their way, In many a bloody field and fray, And taught them it was dangerous play To meddle with our Dixie.
McClellan, the Napoleon young, Whose praises through the North were sung, Round Richmond his vast columns strung; And he would soon have Dixie; But ne’er was such a battle field, For seven long days the cannons peal’d, And the Young Nap. was forc’d to yield, And fly away from Dixie.
Then Pope, the lying braggart, knave, All honor to himself would crave; The Rebels he would soon enslave, And plunder all our Dixie. But in Manassa’s second fight, That rag’d through morning, noon and night, And boasting Pope was put to flight, And fled in shame from Dixie.
Then next the mighty Burnside came, Full charged with martial fire and flame, To win himself immortal fame, By subjugating Dixie. But how the Yankee vandals bled— Round Fredericksburg were piled their dead, And Burnside, too, inglorious fled, And quit the land of Dixie.
Next Hooker came to hook us all, Whom “Fighting Joe,” the Yankees call, But Hooker’s pride met a sad fall Upon the plains of Dixie; And in the Rappahannock stream The drowning Yankees shriek and scream— They came, (ah, little did they dream,) To food the fish of Dixie.
All honor to our God belong, And to Him raise your noblest song, He is our trust, His arm is strong, And He defends our Dixie. Our Stonewall, Hills, Longstreet and Lees, With Beauregard, too, if you please, Like rocks that beat back the wild seas, Are the guardians of our Dixie.
To the ladies of our sunny land, One thought for you with pen in hand— A noble and illustrious band Are the daughters of our Dixie; Surpassing Greek and Roman fame, The world will long your deeds proclaim, Immortal make your fame and name, The glory of our Dixie.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Our Little Ghost

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
From The Horn of Plenty of Home Poems and Home Pictures, published in 1875 by W.F. Gill and Company. First published in The Flag of Our Union (a weekly) Issue: September 15, 1866 [vol. 21, no. 37].
OFT, in the silence of the night,  When the lonely moon rides high, When wintry winds are whistling,  And we hear the owl's shrill cry, In the quiet, dusky chamber,  By the flickering firelight, Rising up between two sleepers,  Comes a spirit all in white.
A winsome little ghost it is,  Rosy-cheeked, and bright of eye; With yellow curls all breaking loose  From the small cap pushed awry. Up it climbs among the pillows,  For the "big dark" brings no dread, And a baby's boundless fancy  Makes a kingdom of a bed.
A fearless little ghost it is;  Safe the night seems as the day; The moon is but a gentle face,  And the sighing winds are gay. The solitude is full of friends,  And the hour brings no regrets; For, in this happy little soul,  Shines a sun that never sets.
A merry little ghost it is,  Dancing gayly by itself, On the flowery counterpane,  Like a tricksy household elf; Nodding to the fitful shadows,  As they flicker on the wall; Talking to familiar pictures,  Mimicking the owl's shrill call.
A thoughtful little ghost if is;  And, when lonely gambols tire, With chubby hands on chubby knees,  It sits winking at the fire. Fancies innocent and lovely  Shine before those baby-eyes, -- Endless fields of dandelions,  Brooks, and birds, and butterflies.
A loving little ghost it is:  When crept into its nest, Its hand on father's shoulder laid,  Its head on mother's breast, It watches each familiar face,  With a tranquil, trusting eye; And, like a sleepy little bird,  Sings its own soft lullaby.
Then those who feigned to sleep before,  Lest baby play till dawn, Wake and watch their folded flower --  Little rose without a thorn. And, in the silence of the night,  The hearts that love it most Pray tenderly above its sleep,  "God bless our little ghost!"
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Our Little Girl

​“Our Little Girl”
Robert A. Simon
​“Our Little Girl” By Robert A. Simon
BONI AND LIVERIGHT
PUBLISHERS :: NEW YORK
​Copyright, 1923
by
BONI & LIVERIGHT, Inc.
Printed in the United States of America
​To
RICHARD L. SIMON
* I - Another Chapter on Ears
* II - Pride and Joy
* III - The Still Small Voice
* IV - Of Small Beginnings
* V - Including What Little Girls Are Made Of
* VI - Gradus Ad Parnassum
* VII - Two Verdicts
* VIII - Where Is Thy Sting?
* IX - Prelude
* X - For Art's Sake
* XI - Sweet Are The Uses Of Publicity
* XII - Guide, Philosopher, And-
* XIII - -Friend
* XIV - Aeolian Hall, Saturday Afternoon
* XV - 137 West 88th Street, Sunday Morning
* XVI - Prima Dona
* XVII - And A Good Song Ringing Clear
* XVIII - The Greatest Of These Is Charity
* XIX - Man Proposes
* XX - Here Comes The Bride
* XXI - Happily Ever After
* XXII - Symphonia Domestica
* XXIII - Climax
* XXIV - Anticlimax
* XXV - Symphonie Pathetique
* XXVI - Da Capo
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Out of the World

An account of some time spent on French Island off the coast of Australia in 1842 and 1843. Serial article published in Once a Week.
* Part 1
* Part 2
# Out of due time

London, New York & Bombay: Longmans, Green, & Co., pages iii–v
OUT OF DUE TIME
A NOVEL
BY Mrs. WILFRID WARD AUTHOR OF "ONE POOR SCRUPLE" AND "THE LIGHT BEHIND"
"La modernità è buona ma l'eterno è migliore"
Fogazzaro
NEW IMPRESSION
LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO. 39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON NEW YORK AND BOMBAY 1906
CONTENTS.
# Outcast

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Outcast."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* An Outcast; or, virtue and faith by Francis Colburn Adams
* Outcast (1922), a poem by Claude McKay
* The Outcast (1922), a work by E. F. Benson
* The Outcast, part of The Gospel of Buddha by Paul Carus
* The Outcast, a poem by Elizabeth Margaret Chandler
* The Outcast, a poem by Alexander Pushkin
* The Outcasts by Arthur Conan Doyle
* "The Outcasts" by George Warburton Lewis. in Weird Tales, 2 (1) (July-August 1923)
# Out with the World

“I'm out with all the world to-day…”
* Shorter, Dora Sigerson (1893), "Out with the World" in Verses
* Shorter, Dora Sigerson (1907), "Out with the World" in The Collected Poems of Dora Sigerson Shorter
# Papuan Fairy Tales/Dakodako, the Man Eater

DAKODAKO, THE MAN EATER.
There was once a man named Dakodako, who ever hungered for flesh to eat. When the others ate pig or wallaby he ate, but was not satisfied as were they. And he daily bethought him where he might look for flesh meat which he might eat and therewith be filled.
Thus it befell that one day he lay in wait on the path, and slew a man, a stranger passing to another village, as he walked. Then he took his body and cut it up, and laid the pieces in a great earthenware pot, and cooked them over the fire.
When the flesh was cooked he sat down and ate of it till he could eat no more. Then rising up he said, "I will beat upon the drum and dance, for that I have eaten flesh meat which satisfieth."
DAKODAKO, THE MAN EATER.
To face p. 84.
upon the drum and danced, but not so was his heart glad. Then he cast his drum to the ground saying,
"How is it that, though I have eaten well, the voice of the drum pleaseth me not, and in the dance my feet grow weary?"
As he marvelled at this he thought in his heart, "It is because I have slain a man who is nought to me. But now, let me slay my friend, and surely his flesh will be good eating." And it came to pass that on the morrow he sought for his friend, and slew him with his wooden sword. And his body he cooked in like manner to the body of the stranger. And he also ate of it, as he had done the other, and rose up to dance, beating upon the drum. But ere long he laid down the drum, and cried, "What shall I do that I may find flesh to eat which will gladden my heart? Though I have slain and eaten my friend yet is the voice of the drum but faint in my ear, and my feet are heavy in the dance."
After a time the men of Qamana, in the hills, made them ready to fight the men of Dakodako's tribe. Then was Dakodako glad, for he longed to slay men. Therefore he went forth and fell upon the men of Qamana, with his kinsfolk, and many of the hill men were slain, and the rest fled. Then Dakodako, being hungry, took the body of one of his foes whom he had slain, and made ready his flesh for the pot. And when it was cooked he sat down and ate of it until he could eat no more. And this time when he beat upon the drum its voice was pleasant in his ear, and ​his feet were light in the dance and grew not weary.
Therefore he ceased, for he had found what he had sought for so long, and he stood over the body of a slain enemy, one foot being on either side of the body, and cried, "Oh, my people, flesh meat is good indeed, but what can compare with the flesh of an enemy?" Then was he turned into stone, as also was the body of the slain man, and they remain to this day on the hillside of Qamana, that all men may know how great a man was Dakodako and how true are the words which he spake.
# Papuan Campaign/Chapter 8

CONCLUSION
THE BUNA-SANANANDA operation may seem a small show when judged by the standard of operations in other theaters. The Allied forces which took part were the Australian 7th Division, reinforced by two brigades, the U. S. 32d, and a regiment of the 41st. They fought on the defense to remove the threat of enemy land attack on Port Moresby. They killed over 5,000 Japanese soldiers and marines, the total enemy force in the area of operations. But this is not the whole story. The men who fought in the stinking swamps of Papua have special grounds for pride in their victory.
They met the enemy in positions which he had chosen deliberately and fortified cunningly, and they crushed him. Their victory, like the victory on Guadalcanal, proved that the Japanese could be beaten in jungle fighting and that the vaunted Japanese morale could crack. Though the Buna-Sanananda operation was defensive in the larger sense, it was nevertheless a tactical offensive and a fitting prelude to the Allied offensive of 1943 in the Southwest Pacific.
Our troops fought the enemy, and they fought the jungle. They learned the bitter lessons of jungle warfare. Each day the heat, the humidity, and the diseases of the jungle sapped the strength of those who did not fall, killed or wounded. As one example, the units of the 126th Infantry which went into the action on the Sanananda front had 1,199 men and officers; when these same units were relieved on 9 January 1943, only 165 men and officers came out of the lines. They had fought their way foot by foot through tangled swamp and kunai grass around the Japanese position; for 3 long weeks they had held their road block despite incessant attacks from the strong enemy forces which they kept apart. Of these and of all the men in the Buna-Sanananda operation, it can be said, "They accomplished their mission."
# Poems (Chesterton, 1915)/Sonnet

SONNET
ON HEARING A LANDLORD ACCUSED (FALSELY, FOR ALL THE BARD CAN SAY) OF NEGLECTING ONE OF THE NUMEROUS WHITE HORSES THAT WERE OR WERE NOT CONNECTED WITH ALFRED THE GREAT
IF you have picked your lawn of leaves and snails, If you have told your valet, even with oaths, Once a week or so, to brush your clothes, If you have dared to clean your teeth, or nails, While the Horse upon the holy mountain fails— Then God that Alfred to his earth betrothes Send on you screaming all that honour loathes, Horsewhipping, Hounsditch, debts, and Daily Mails.
Can you not even conserve? For if indeed The White Horse fades; then closer creeps the fight When we shall scour the face of England white, Plucking such men as you up like a weed, And fling them far beyond a shaft shot right When Wessex went to battle for the creed.