OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Georgia v. Rachel

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
384 U.S. 780
Georgia v. Rachel
Argued: April 25 and 26, 1966. --- Decided: June 20, 1966
[Syllabus from pages 780-781 intentionally omitted]
George K. McPherson, Jr., J. Robert Sparks, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner.
Anthony G. Amsterdam, Washington, D.C., for respondents.
Mr. Justice STEWART delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Getica
## Translations

* The origin and deeds of the Goths in English version, translated by Charles Christopher Mierow (1908)
** Revised version: The Gothic History of Jordanes (1915) (transcription project)

## Works about

* “15. The Origin of the Goths; and the Gothic History of Jordanes”, in “Appendix, Additional Notes by the Editor,” in The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, by Edward Gibbon, edited and annotated by J. B. Bury, volume 1 (1897)
* "Jordanes," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
# Getting Married/A Probable Effect of Giving Women the Vote

The political emancipation of women is likely to lead to a comparatively stringent enforcement by law of sexual morality (that is why so many of us dread it); and this will soon compel us to consider what our sexual morality shall be. At present a ridiculous distinction is made between vice and crime, in order that men may be vicious with impunity. Adultery, for instance, though it is sometimes fiercely punished by giving an injured husband crushing damages in a divorce suit (injured wives are not considered in this way), is not now directly prosecuted; and this impunity extends to illicit relations between unmarried persons who have reached what is called the age of consent. There are other matters, such as notification of contagious disease and solicitation, in which the hand of the law has been brought down on one sex only. Outrages which were capital offences within the memory of persons still living when committed on women outside marriage, can still be inflicted by men on their wives without legal remedy. At all such points the code will be screwed up by the operation of Votes for Women, if there be any virtue in the franchise at all. The result will be that men will find the more ascetic side of our sexual morality taken seriously by the law. It is easy to foresee the consequences. No man will take much trouble to alter laws which he can evade, or which are either not enforced or enforced on women only. But when these laws take him by the collar and thrust him into prison, he suddenly becomes keenly critical of them, and of the arguments by which they are supported. Now we have seen that our marriage laws will not stand criticism, and that they have held out so far only because they are so worked as to fit roughly our state of society, in which women are neither politically nor personally free, in which indeed women are called womanly only when they regard themselves as existing solely for the use of men. When Liberalism enfranchises them politically, and Socialism emancipates them economically, they will no longer allow the law to take immorality so easily. Both men and women will be forced to behave morally in sex matters; and when they find that this is inevitable they will raise the question of what behavior really should be established as moral. If they decide in favor of our present professed morality they will have to make a revolutionary change in their habits by becoming in fact what they only pretend to be at present. If, on the other hand, they find that this would be an unbearable tyranny, without even the excuse of justice or sound eugenics, they will reconsider their morality and remodel the law.
# Gesu Bambino

"Gesù bambino" is an Italian Christmas carol composed by Pietro Yon in 1917. It was translated to English by Frederick H. Martens. It is interesting to note that the song derives its melody from the 17th century traditional Irish carol “I saw three ships”, though the carol is a simpler version of the tune. The lyrics of the chorus are also the same as the lyrics in the chorus of O Come All Ye Faithful.Warning: template has been deprecated.
When blossoms flowered 'mid the snows upon a winter night Was born the Child the Christmas Rose, The King of Love and Light The angels sang, the shepherds sang, The grateful earth rejoiced And at His blessed birth the stars Their exultation voiced.
O Come let us adore Him, O come let us adore Him O come let us adore Him, Christ the Lord.
Again the heart with rapture glows to greet the holy night that gave the world its Christmas Rose, its king of Love and Light Let ev'ry voice acclaim His name, The grateful chorus swell From paradise to earth He came that we with Him might dwell
O come let us adore him O come let us adore Him O come let us adore Him, Christ the Lord.
Ah! O come let us adore Him Ah! Adore Him, Christ, the Lord. O come, O come O come let us adore Him Let us adore Him Christ, the Lord.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Getting Married

Written in 1908.
N.B.--There is a point of some technical interest to be noted in this play. The customary division into acts and scenes has been disused, and a return made to unity of time and place, as observed in the ancient Greek drama. In the foregoing tragedy, The Doctor's Dilemma, there are five acts; the place is altered five times; and the time is spread over an undetermined period of more than a year. No doubt the strain on the attention of the audience and on the ingenuity of the playwright is much less; but I find in practice that the Greek form is inevitable when drama reaches a certain point in poetic and intellectual evolution. Its adoption was not, on my part, a deliberate display of virtuosity in form, but simply the spontaneous falling of a play of ideas into the form most suitable to it, which turned out to be the classical form. Getting Married, in several acts and scenes, with the time spread over a long period, would be impossible. (GBS)
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gregg v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
394 U.S. 489
Gregg v. United States
Argued: Feb. 25, 1969. --- Decided: April 2, 1969
See 395 U.S. 917, 89 S.Ct. 1738.
Dean E. Richards, Indianapolis, Ind., for petitioner.
Sidney M. Glazer, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Great Northern Railway Company v. Minnesota

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Great Northern Railway Company v. Minnesota."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Great Northern Railway Company v. Minnesota (216 U.S. 206)
* Great Northern Railway Company v. Minnesota (278 U.S. 503)
# Great Northern Railway Company v. Minnesota (278 U.S. 503)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
278 U.S. 503
Great Northern Railway Company v. Minnesota (278 U.S. 503)
Argued: Jan. 9, 1929. --- Decided: Feb 18, 1929
Messrs. F. G. Dorety and Thomas Balmer, both of St. Paul, Minn., for plaintiff in error and appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 504-505 intentionally omitted]
G. A. Youngquist, Atty. Gen., of Minnesota, for State of Minnesota.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Great Northern Railway Company v. Minnesota ex rel Village of Clara City

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
246 U.S. 434
Great Northern Railway Company v. Minnesota ex rel Village of Clara City
Argued: March 12, 1918. --- Decided: April 15, 1918
Messrs. E. C. Lindley, M. L. Countryman, and Thomas R. Benton, all of St. Paul, Minn., for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. C. A. Fosnes, of Montevideo, Minn., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice DAY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Great Northern Railway Company v. Minnesota (216 U.S. 206)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
216 U.S. 206
Great Northern Railway Company v. Minnesota
Argued: November 5, 8, 1909. --- Decided: February 21, 1910
Mr. William R. Begg for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 207-211 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. George T. Simpson and George W. Peterson for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Great Northern Railway Company v. Merchants' Elevator Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
259 U.S. 285
Great Northern Railway Company v. Merchants' Elevator Company
Argued: April 18, 1922. --- Decided: May 29, 1922
Mr. John F. Finerty, of St. Paul, Minn., for petitioners.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 286-288 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Harold S. Simpson, of Minneapolis, Minn., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Great Northern Railway Company v. Minnesota ex rel Railroad & Warehouse Commission of the State of Minnesota

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
238 U.S. 340
Great Northern Railway Company v. Minnesota ex rel Railroad & Warehouse Commission of the State of Minnesota
Argued: April 16, 1915. --- Decided: June 14, 1915
Messrs. E. C. Lindley and Sanford H. E. Freund for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 341 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Lyndon A. Smith, Attorney General of Minnesota, and Mr. Alonzo J. Edgerton for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 342 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McReynolds delivered the opintion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin/Dissent Thomas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Thomas Alito
THOMAS, J., dissenting
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 14–981
ABIGAIL NOEL FISHER, PETITIONER v. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN, ET AL.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
[June 23, 2016]
JUSTICE THOMAS, dissenting.
I join JUSTICE ALITO's dissent. As JUSTICE ALITO explains, the Court's decision today is irreconcilable with strict scrutiny, rests on pernicious assumptions about race, and departs from many of our precedents.
I write separately to reaffirm that "a State's use of race in higher education admissions decisions is categorically prohibited by the Equal Protection Clause." Fisher v. University of Tex. at Austin, 570 U. S. ___, ___ (2013) (THOMAS, J., concurring) (slip op., at 1). "The Constitution abhors classifications based on race because every time the government places citizens on racial registers and makes race relevant to the provision of burdens or benefits, it demeans us all." Id., at ___ (slip op., at 2) (internal quotation marks omitted). That constitutional imperative does not change in the face of a "faddish theor[y]" that racial discrimination may produce "educational benefits." Id., at ___, ___ (slip op., at 5, 13). The Court was wrong to hold otherwise in Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U. S. 306, 343 (2003). I would overrule Grutter and reverse the Fifth Circuit's judgment.
# Fisher v. Whiton

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
317 U.S. 602
FISHER v. WHITON.
Argued: Nov. 16, 1942. --- Decided: Dec 7, 1942
Messrs. John F. Anderson, of Washington, D.C., S. Bartow Strang, of Chattanooga, Tenn., and George P. Barse, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Joe Frassrand, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for respondents.
Mr. Justice MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fisher v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
328 U.S. 463
Fisher v. United States
Argued: Dec. 5, 1945. --- Decided: June 10, 1946
See 67 S.Ct. 24.
Mr. Charles H. Houston, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Charles B. Murray, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hancock National Bank v. Farnum

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
176 U.S. 640
Hancock National Bank v. Farnum
Argued: December 21, 1899. --- Decided: March 12, 1900
The facts of this case are these: The plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, a creditor of the Commonwealth Loan & Trust Company, a corporation duly organized under the laws of the state of Kansas, recovered a judgment on December 8, 1893, in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Kansas against the corporation for the sum of $16,136.76 debt, and $28.45 costs of suit. Thereafter, on April 27, 1894, an execution was issued on the judgment, and after due search and diligence no property of the corporation could be found to be taken in satisfaction thereof, and it was returned wholly unsatisfied. The corporation was not a railway, religious, or charitable corporation. The defendant is a stockholder in that corporation, holding ten shares of the capital stock of the par value of $100 each, and appearing as such stockholder on the books of the corporation. Setting forth these facts with further detail of the provisions of the Kansas Constitution and statutes, the plaintiff filed its declaration in the common pleas division of the supreme court of Rhode Island to recover a judgment for a sum equal to the amount of defendant's stock. To this declaration a demurrer was filed and sustained and judgment entered for the defendant (20 R. I. 466, —L. R. A. --, 40 Atl. 341), to reverse which judgment the plaintiff sued out this writ of error.
Messrs. William Reed Bigelow, H. J. Jaquith, William J. Cronin, and John E. Conley for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Walter F. Angell, Stephen O. Edwards, Seeber Edwards, and Albert Gerald for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hancock v. Holbrook

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Hancock v. Holbrook."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Hancock v. Holbrook (112 U.S. 229)
* Hancock v. Holbrook (119 U.S. 586)
# Hancock v. Holbrook (112 U.S. 229)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
112 U.S. 229
Hancock v. Holbrook
Eppa Hunton, Jeff. Chandler, J. D. Rouse, and Wm. Grant, for appellant.
Thos. J. Semmes and Robert Mott, for appellee.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hancock v. City of Muskogee

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
250 U.S. 454
Hancock v. City of Muskogee
Argued: April 30, 1919. --- Decided: June 9, 1919
Messrs. B. B. Blakeney and James H. Maxey, both of Tulsa, Okl., and Grant Foreman and James D. Simms, both of Muskogee, Okl., for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Nathan A. Gibson and Joseph L. Hull, both of Muskogee, Okl., for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice PITNEY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hand in Hand/To Chastelard at a Fancy Ball

To Chastelard at a Fancy Ball
(An Acrostic)
CALLED back a season from the shades below How looks the world in its last phantasy? Are living women, in their youth's bright glow, Sweet as your own dead queen in memory? Tell all true lovers who have wept your woe, Each poet who has sung your hapless fate, Let us, whose eyes grow dim with pity know, Are all life's pleasant paths left desolate? Remembering afresh your tragic tale, Does Love seem timid grown, and wan, and pale?
# Hand in Hand/The Power of Time

The Power of Time
TIMES power is infinite: there was a day When I, in wild abasement, wept and prayed, Petitioning that it might pass away This grief, which now I bear most undismayed.
The very stones where once I bleeding strayed Now fit themselves to my accustomed feet. Look you, I laugh, who was so sore afraid, The first time I and my great grief did meet.
The bitterest potion grows by custom, sweet, Or loathing may be hidden with a smile: I have subdued the anguish that did beat About my heart, a weary weary while,
And yet, methinks it proves but little gain, That pain itself should dull my sense of pain!
# Hand in Hand/The Strength of the Hills

The Strength of the Hills
THE pines are the shafts of the temple, The wild rose burns incense on high, The wind’s voice is chanting an anthem, The roof is the infinite sky. Now life bas grown glad for the living, We see them, we gain them at length, Our help, and our shelter, health-giving, The hills in their strength!
A respite have we from the furnace, A rest from the toil and the heat: Before we return to our harness The calm and the coolness are sweet. Drinking deep of the pure air, redressed by Its peace for our manifold ills: We are gladdened, and heartened, and blessed by The strength of the hills!
Mussoorie, N.W.P.
# Hand in Hand/The Woman's Share

The Woman's Share
SURE it looks the same, but 'tis all different too, I spin, an’ knit, an’ sing, in the way I used to do: But the spindle pricks my finger, an’ my voice dies down, For where’s the use o’ watchin’ at the road from the town? Sunrise, sunset, Slow goes the day, 'Tis here he was, an’ I am here, An’ he is gone away.
Violets at the brookside, I smell them when I pass, But where’s the boy that picked them as we laughed along the grass? “No bluer than your two eyes.” How soon do eyes grow dim? Mine have learnt the tear-sting since last they looked on him. Sunrise, sunset, Long night and day! 'Tis here he was, an’ I am here, An’ he is gone away.
Winds in the autumn, to lash the waves to roar,
He is on the sea, maybe, I am on the shore.
Tossing mat o' sea-wrack, tangle-weed afloat,
Have you been the lucky one, did ye touch his boat?
Sunrise, sunset,
Ah, the weary day! 'Tis here he was, an' I am here,
An' he is gone away.
Winter comes at long last, an' the snow is spread
Cold an' white an' even, like a face that's dead,
Women love a lifetime, that's not the way with men,
'Tis I'll be old an' ugly, an' will he love me then?
Sunrise, sunset,
Slow goes the day. 'Tis here he was, an' I am here,
An' he is gone away.
# Hand in Hand/Three Maidens

Three Maidens
I HEARD three maidens laughing merrily, All three were young and one was very fair; Except in jest they had not breathed a sigh, And save the name, they nothing knew of care.
As I came by they rose and clasped me round: "Tell us," they said, "for you have older years, What is this love that each of us has found; Is it a thing for laughter, or for tears?"
One held my hand,—she would not let me go— The fairest whispered softly, "Answer me." The third said lightly, "Ah, she does not know; Love never came so near that she should see!"
I could not speak the truth—I would not lie— And so without a word I passed them by.
# Hand in Hand/Thrift

Thrift
IF you had given me the kiss I craved At our last parting, placed your hand in mine, Or even for one moment laid your head To rest upon the heart that ached for you, I should have faced my fate with stouter soul, And walked with firmer feet to meet my doom. It was not much I asked! Not much for you, So rich in all I lacked, to give or grant, And I, poor, desolate, and most forlorn, Should for such grace have blessed you all my days.
Now, neither kiss, nor tender clasping hand, Nor e'en the gift of your whole self could save This wand'rer, shipwrecked on the sea of life; Who, passing by your door, says only this— "You are no richer, dear, for that day's thrift, While I am made the poorer for all time."
# Hand in Hand/The Silent Crowd

The Silent Crowd
(February 2nd, 1901.)
FOR a pageant do you wait? Quiet crowd, mourning crowd. For a solemn Hearse of State, With a velvet pall and plumes, Sable splendour of the tombs, For the Queen, Victoria! Victoria! See! The carriage of a gun, And a Coffin set thereon, Comes the Queen! Ave Regina Gloria! Solemn silence for the Queen.
'Neath this Flag a sailor dies, On the wave; 'Neath this Flag a soldier lies, For his grave. And the Queen of both was she, As she willed, so let it be;
In her great simplicity, And her spotless purity, Comes the Queen, Empress-Queen!
The Sailor's Queen went through her Fleet, Her Last Review: The cannon rent the sky, The flags were half-mast high. There were no cheers, But only tears, As she went by.
The Soldier's Queen goes to her grave, In simplest state. See! The carriage of a gun, With a Coffin set thereon, Grave and great, And a pure white gleaming Pall.
A white Pall for the Woman, And a gold Crown for the Queen, And a Coffin for the Human, To hide the fleshly screen.
So simple! This is all, Our great Queen's Funeral.
But the Kings of many lands, And the Emperors from afar, Mourners are. Solemn silence for the Queen,
Toll the bells, let music play To the pulse of muffled drums. See! The white Crowned Coffin comes, And the cannon say their say. Tears in silence for our Queen On her way. On her path without returning, Living silence for our Queen. Through our bitter tears and burning, Let us pray, Ave Regina Gloria! Victoria! Victoria! Loved for aye!