OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# New Jersey v. New York (31 U.S. 323)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
31 U.S. 323
New Jersey v. New York
The court have had the return made in this case under consideration. It considers the demurrer filed in this case by the attorney-general of New York, as being an appearance for the state, he being a practitioner in this court; and therefore, that the demurrer is regularly filed. If the attorney general did not so mean it, it is not a paper which can be considered as in the cause, or be placed on the files of the court. We say this now, that the attorney-general may have due notice, if he did not intend to enter any appearance for the state; it being otherwise a paper not to be received.
The demurrer, then, being admitted as containing an appearance by the state, the court is of opinion, that it amounts to a compliance with the order at the last term. In that order, the word 'answer,' is not used in a technical sense, as an answer to the charges in the bill under oath; but an answer, in a more general sense, to the bill. A demurrer is an answer in law to the bill, though not in a technical sense an answer according to the common language of practice.
The court, therefore, direct the demurrer to be set down for argument, on the first Monday of March of this term, according to the motion of the plaintiffs.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# New Jersey v. New York (345 U.S. 369)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
345 U.S. 369
New Jersey v. New York (345 U.S. 369)
Argued: March 9, 1953. --- Decided: April 6, 1953
Mr. Abraham L. Freedman, Philadelphia, Pa., for City of philadelphia.
Mr. John P. McGrath, New York City, for City of New York.
Mr. Edward L. Ryan, Albany, N.Y., for State of New York.
Mr. Bernard G. Segal, Philadelphia, Pa., for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Mr. Kenneth H. Murray, New York City, for State of New Jersey.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# New Jersey v. New York (283 U.S. 805)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
283 U.S. 805
New Jersey v. New York (283 U.S. 805)

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Labor Relations Board v. A. J. Tower Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
329 U.S. 324
National Labor Relations Board v. A. J. Tower Company
Argued: Nov. 21, 1946. --- Decided: Dec 23, 1946
Mr.Gerhard P. Van Arkel, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. John T. Noonan, of Boston, Mass., for respondent.
Mr. Justice MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Hurricane Center Hurricane Camille Bulletin 6

NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI
BULLETIN 9 PM EDT FRIDAY AUGUST 15, 1969
...EYE OF CAMILLE OVER EXTREME WESTERN CUBA...
CAMILLE IS NOW UNDER SURVEILLANCE OF THE KEY WEST AND HAVANA RADARS. AT 9 PM BOTH LOCATE THE CENTER OF THE STORM OVER EXTREME WESTERN CUBA MIDWAY BETWEEN CAPE SAN ANTONIO AND GUANE NEAR LATITUDE 22.0 NORTH...LONGITUDE 84.5 WEST. THIS POSITION IS 250 MILES SOUTH SOUTHWEST OF KEY WEST FLORIDA.
THERE HAVE BEEN NO REPORTS OF PEAK WINDS OR TIDES FROM LOCATIONS IN THE IMMEDIATE PATH OF THE EYE HOWEVER STATIONS ON THE PERIPHERY OF THE CALM CENTRAL REGION HAVE RECORDED WINDS IN EXCESS OF 50 MPH.
AN AIR FORCE RECONNAISSANCE PLANE THIS AFTERNOON FOUND A CENTRAL PRESSURE OF 966 MB OR 28.53 INCHES.
SMALL CRAFT IN THE FLORIDA KEYS SHOULD REMAIN IN SAFE HARBOR AND THOSE ALONG THE FLORIDA WEST COAST FROM TAMPA SOUTHWARD SHOULD NOT VENTURE FAR FROM SAFE HARBOR. SMALL CRAFT ON THE FLORIDA SOUTHEAST COAST SHOULD EXERCISE CAUTION.
CAMILLE IS EXPECTED TO CONTINUE MOVING TOWARDS THE NORTH NORTHWEST OR NORTH AT A SPEED SLIGHTLY LESS THAN 10 MPH. ALL INTERESTS ALONG THE EASTERN GULF OF MEXICO SHOULD REMAIN IN CLOSE TOUCH WITH FUTURE ADVISORIES AND BULLETINS.
REPEATING THE 9 PM EDT POSITION...22.0 NORTH...84.5 WEST.
THE NEXT ADVISORY WILL BE ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER AT MIDNIGHT EDT.
FRANK
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Industrial Traffic League v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 535
National Industrial Traffic League v. United States
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Industrial Traffic League v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 535
National Industrial Traffic League v. United States
John F. Donelan, John M. Cleary, Arthur A. Arsham, and John J. C. Martin, for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Hammond, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Raymond M. Zimmet, for the United States and others.
LeGrand A. Carlston, Z. L. Pearson, Jr., and Bryce Rea, Jr., for appellee Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc.
Bryce Rea, Jr., for appellee Pacific Inland Tariff Bureau, Inc.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Labor Relations Board v. Acme Industrial Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
385 U.S. 432
National Labor Relations Board v. Acme Industrial Company
Argued: Nov. 14, 1966. --- Decided: Jan 9, 1967
Norton J. Come, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
E. Allan Kovar, Chicago, Ill., for respondent.
Mr. Justice STEWART delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# News from Nowhere/Chapter XIII

Said I: "How do you manage with politics?"
Said Hammond, smiling: "I am glad that it is of me that you ask that question; I do believe that anybody else would make you explain yourself, or try to do so, till you were sickened of asking questions. Indeed, I believe I am the only man in England who would know what you mean; and since I know, I will answer your question briefly by saying that we are very well off as to politics,—because we have none. If ever you make a book out of this conversation, put this in a chapter by itself, after the model of old Horrebow's Snakes in Iceland."
"I will," said I.
# National Meter Company v. Board of Water Commisioners of City of Yonkers

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
149 U.S. 48
National Meter Company v. Board of Water Commisioners of City of Yonkers
J. Edgar Bull, Edmund Wetmore, and Amos Broadnax, for appellant.
Frederic H. Betts, Frederick P. Fish, and George L. Roberts, for appellees.
Mr. Justice BLATCHFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. v. United States (371 U.S. 223)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
371 U.S. 223
National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. v. United States
Bryce Rea, Jr. and Frederick A. Babson, Jr., for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Asst. Atty. Gen. Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn, for the United States and Interstate Commerce Commission.
D. Robert Thomas, Harry C. Ames, Sr., Giles Morrow, S. Sidney Eisen and James L. Givan, for appellee freight forwarders.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. v. United States (371 U.S. 223)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
371 U.S. 223
National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. v. United States
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice STEWART is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. v. United States (371 U.S. 223)
* National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. v. United States (372 U.S. 246)
# National Maritime Day, 2009

Issued on 20 May 2009.
Administration of Barack H. Obama, 2009
Proclamation 8384—National Maritime Day, 2009
May 20, 2009
By the President of the United States of America
A Proclamation
    Americans have long looked to the sea as a source of security and prosperity. Bounded by two oceans and the Gulf of Mexico, and criss-crossed by a myriad of inland waterways, America's destiny as a maritime nation was a story foretold.
    The Merchant Marine took up arms alongside the Continental Navy to help defeat the British Navy during the American Revolution. Since then, they have served bravely as the United States has faced threats ranging from war to piracy, and our seafaring fleet has proven instrumental in protecting our safety. In times of conflict and crisis, the Armed Forces rely on the Merchant Marine's sealift capability to transport critical equipment and supplies. Time and again, mariners have demonstrated their willingness and ability to meet daunting challenges.
    Waterways have also enabled much of the commerce that has expanded America's economy. Domestic and international commerce occurred along rivers and coasts even before our Nation's birth. Great cities have sprouted near waterways, and maritime activity remains crucial to our economy today.
    The men and women of the U.S. Merchant Marine and the many other workers who have supported the maritime industry have made significant contributions to our leadership in the global marketplace, and to our security.
    On this National Maritime Day, we also mark the opening of a permanent exhibition at the Smithsonian Institution, "On the Water" It demonstrates the importance of the maritime industry and chronicles our history as a maritime nation.
    The Congress, by a joint resolution approved May 20, 1933, has designated May 22 of each year as "National Maritime Day" and has authorized and requested the President to issue annually a proclamation calling for its appropriate observance.
    Now, Therefore, I, Barack Obama, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim May 22, 2009, as National Maritime Day. I call upon the people of the United States to mark this observance by honoring the service of merchant mariners and by displaying the flag of the United States at their homes and in their communities. I also request that all ships sailing under the American flag dress ship on that day.
    In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.
    BARACK OBAMA
[Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 11:15 a.m., May 21, 2009]
NOTE: This proclamation was published in the Federal Register on May 22.
Categories: Proclamations : National Maritime Day.
Subjects: Maritime Day, National.
DCPD Number: DCPD200900383
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Mines Corporation v. Caryl

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
497 U.S. 922
National Mines Corporation v. Caryl
No. 89-337
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Metropolitan Bank v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
323 U.S. 454
National Metropolitan Bank v. United States
Argued: Dec. 13, 14, 1944. --- Decided: Jan 8, 1945
Mr. George C. Gertman, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. David L. Kreeger, of Washington, D.C., for respondent, pro hac vici, by special leave of Court.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# New Zealand Institute Amendment Act 1930

21 Geo. V., 1930 No. 18
ANALYSIS
Title.
* Short Title.
* Section 2 of principal Act (as to constitution of Institute) amended.
* Section 3 of principal Act (as to constitution of Board) amended.
* Section 4 of principal Act consequentially amended.
* Power to appoint Vice-President of Institute.
* Alteration of date of annual meeting.
1930, No. 18.
An Act to amend the New Zealand Institute Act, 1908.
[11th October, 1930.
BE IT ENACTED by the General Assembly of New Zealand in Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:—
Short Title.1. This Act may be cited as the New Zealand Institute Amendment Act, 1930, and shall be read together with and deemed part of the New Zealand Institute Act, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the principal Act).
Section 2 of principal Act (as to constitution of Institute) amended.2. Section two of the principal Act is hereby amended by including in the list of incorporated societies in subsection one a reference to the Manawatu Philosophical Society, and by omitting from that list the references to the Westland Institute and the Southland Institute.
Section 3 of principal Act (as to constitution of Board) amended.3. Section three of the principal Act is hereby amended as follows:—
(a) By omitting the reference to the Minister of Internal Affairs, and substituting a reference to the Minister for the time being in charge of the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research; and
(b) By adding the following paragraph:—
"One additional member may from time to time be appointed by the Board for a term not exceeding two years, save that any such member may, on the expiration of his term of office, be reappointed as a member of the Board."
Section 4 of principal Act consequently amended.4. Section four of the principal Act is hereby amended by inserting, after the word "Board" in subsection two, the words "other than a member appointed by the Board".
​Power to appoint Vice-President of Institute.5. Section six of the principal Act is hereby amended by adding to subsection one the following words: "The Board may also appoint a Vice-President."
Alteration of date of annual meeting.6. Section eight of the principal Act is hereby amended as follows:—
(a) By omitting from subsection one the word "January", and substituting the words "April or the month of May"; and
(b) By omitting from subsection three the word "preceding", and substituting the words "ended on the thirty-first day of March then last past".
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume V/On Nature and Grace/Chapter 83

Chapter 83 [LXIX.]—God Enjoins No Impossibility, Because All Things are Possible and Easy to Love.
But “the precepts of the law are very good,” if we use them lawfully. Indeed, by the very fact (of which we have the firmest conviction) “that the just and good God could not possibly have enjoined impossibilities,” we are admonished both what to do in easy paths and what to ask for when they are difficult. Now all things are easy for love to effect, to which (and which alone) “Christ’s burden is light,”—or rather, it is itself alone the burden which is light. Accordingly it is said, “And His commandments are not grievous;” so that whoever finds them grievous must regard the inspired statement about their “not being grievous” as having been capable of only this meaning, that there may be a state of heart to which they are not burdensome, and he must pray for that disposition which he at present wants, so as to be able to fulfil all that is commanded him. And this is the purport of what is said to Israel in Deuteronomy, if understood in a godly, sacred, and spiritual sense, since the apostle, after quoting the passage, “The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth and in thy heart” (and, as the verse also has it, in thine hands, for in man’s heart are his spiritual hands), adds in explanation, “This is the word of faith which we preach.” No man, therefore, who “returns to the Lord his God,” as he is there commanded, “with all his heart and with all his soul,” will find God’s commandment “grievous.” How, indeed, can it be grievous, when it is the precept of love? Either, therefore, a man has not love, and then it is grievous; or he has love, and then it is not grievous. But he possesses love if he does what is there enjoined on Israel, by returning to the Lord his God with all his heart and with all his soul. “A new commandment,” says He, “do I give unto you, that ye love one another;” and “He that loveth his neighbour hath fulfilled the law;” and again, “Love is the fulfilling of the law.” In accordance with these sayings is that passage, “Had they trodden good paths, they would have found, indeed, the ways of righteousness easy.” How then is it written, “Because of the words of Thy lips, I have kept the paths of difficulty,” except it be that both statements are true: These paths are paths of difficulty to fear; but to love they are easy?

## Footnotes

* ↑ See 1 Tim. i. 8.
* ↑ Matt. xi. 30.
* ↑ 1 John v. 3.
* ↑ Deut. xxx. 14, quoted Rom. x. 8.
* ↑ According to the Septuagint, which adds after ἐν τῇ καρδία σου the words καὶ ἐν ταῖς χερσί σου. This was probably Pelagius’ reading. Compare Quæstion. in Deuteron. Book v. 54.
* ↑ Rom. x. 8.
* ↑ Deut. xxx. 2.
* ↑ John xiii. 34.
* ↑ Rom. xiii. 8.
* ↑ Rom. xiii. 10.
* ↑ Prov. ii. 20.
* ↑ Ps. xvii. 4.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume V/On Nature and Grace/Chapter 84

Chapter 84 [LXX.]—The Degrees of Love are Also Degrees of Holiness.
Inchoate love, therefore, is inchoate holiness; advanced love is advanced holiness; great love is great holiness; “perfect love is perfect holiness,”—but this “love is out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned,” “which in this life is then the greatest, when life itself is contemned in comparison with it.” I wonder, however, whether it has not a soil in which to grow after it has quitted this mortal life! But in what place and at what time soever it shall reach that state of absolute perfection, which shall admit of no increase, it is certainly not “shed abroad in our hearts” by any energies either of the nature or the volition that are within us, but “by the Holy Ghost which is given unto us,” “and which both helps our infirmity and co-operates with our strength. For it is itself indeed the grace of God, through our Lord Jesus Christ, to whom, with the Father and the Holy Spirit, appertaineth eternity, and all goodness, for ever and ever. Amen.

## Footnotes

* ↑ 1 Tim. i. 5.
* ↑ See note at beginning of ch. 82 for the meaning of this mark of quotation.
* ↑ Rom. v. 5.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume V/On Nature and Grace/Chapter 9

Chapter 9 [VIII.]—Even They Who Were Not Able to Be Justified are Condemned.
See what he has said. I, however, affirm that an infant born in a place where it was not possible for him to be admitted to the baptism of Christ, and being overtaken by death, was placed in such circumstances, that is to say, died without the bath of regeneration, because it was not possible for him to be otherwise. He would therefore absolve him, and, in spite of the Lord’s sentence, open to him the kingdom of heaven. The apostle, however, does not absolve him, when he says: “By one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; by which death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned.” Rightly, therefore, by virtue of that condemnation which runs throughout the mass, is he not admitted into the kingdom of heaven, although he was not only not a Christian, but was unable to become one.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Rom. v. 12.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume V/On Nature and Grace/Extract from Augustin's Retractations

Extract from Augustin’s “Retractations,”
Book II. Chap. 42,
On the Following Treatise,
“De natura et gratia.”
“At that time also there came into my hands a certain book of Pelagius’, in which he defends, with all the argumentative skill he could muster, the nature of man, in opposition to the grace of God whereby the unrighteous is justified and we become Christians. The treatise which contains my reply to him, and in which I defend grace, not indeed as in opposition to nature, but as that which liberates and controls nature, I have entitled On Nature and Grace. In this work sundry short passages, which were quoted by Pelagius as the words of the Roman bishop and martyr, Xystus, were vindicated by myself as if they really were the words of this Sixtus. For this I thought them at the time; but I afterwards discovered, that Sextus the heathen philosopher, and not Xystus the Christian bishop, was their author. This treatise of mine begins with the words: ‘The book which you sent me.’”

## Footnotes

* ↑ In chap. 77.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume V/On Nature and Grace/Title Page

a treatise on nature and grace.