OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography/Tiffin, Edward

Edition of 1900.
​TIFFIN, Edward, statesman, b. in Carlisle, England, 19 June, 1766; d. in Chillicothe, Ohio, 9 Aug., 1829. After receiving an ordinary English education, he began the study of medicine, and continued it after his removal to Charlestown, Va., in 1784, receiving his degree at the University of Pennsylvania in 1789. In the same year he married Mary, sister of Gov. Thomas Worthington. In 1790, he united with the Methodist church, and soon afterward he became a local preacher, being ordained deacon by Bishop Asbury, on 19 Nov., 1792. In 1796 he removed to Chillicothe, Ohio, where he continued both to preach and to practise medicine. At Deer Creek, twelve miles distant, he organized a flourishing congregation, long before that part of the country was visited by travelling preachers. In 1799 he was chosen to the legislature of the Northwest territory, of which he was elected speaker, and in 1802 he was president of the convention that formed the constitution of the state of Ohio. He was elected first governor of the state in 1803, and re-elected two years later. During his second term he arrested the expedition of Aaron Burr, near Marietta, Ohio. After the expiration of his service he was chosen U.S. senator, to succeed his brother-in-law, Thomas Worthington, and took his seat in December, 1807, but early in the following year his wife died, and on 3 March, 1809, he resigned from the senate and retired to private life. Shortly afterward he married again, and was elected to the legislature, serving two terms as speaker. In the autumn of 1810 he resumed the practice of medicine at Chillicothe, and in 1812, on the creation by act of congress of a commissionership of the general land-office, he was appointed by president Madison as its first incumbent. He removed to Washington, organized the system that has continued in the land-office till the present time, and in 1814 was active in the removal of his papers to Virginia, whereby the entire contents of his office were saved from destruction by the British. Wishing to return to the west, he proposed to Josiah Meigs, surveyor-general of public lands northwest of Ohio river, that they should exchange offices, which was done, after the consent of the president and senate had been obtained. This post he held till 1 July, 1829, when he received, on his death-bed, an order from President Jackson to deliver the office to a successor. Dr. Tiffin continued to preach occasionally in his later years. Three of his sermons were published in the “Ohio Conference Offering” in 1851. In a letter of introduction to Gen. Arthur St. Clair, Gen. Washington speaks of Dr. Tiffin as being “very familiar with the law.”
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book XIX/Hymn 29

29. Continuation of the foregoing.
[As 28. navakam.]
This is a mere continuation of the preceding hymn, and it is hard to see why they are divided. They are found together in Pāipp. xiii. ⌊Ritual use under 28.⌋
Translated: Griffith, ii. 286.
1. Gore, O darbhá, my rivals; gore those that fight against me; gore all my enemies; gore my haters, O amulet.
Half the mss. accent in this verse nikṣá. The comm. follows the dhātupāṭha in interpreting it to mean cumba 'kiss'! ⌊He intends rather the root cumb 'harm,' hiṅsāyām, not cumb, vaktrasaṁyoge.⌋
2. Bore, O darbhá, my rivals; bore those etc. etc.
The comm. glosses the verb with nāçaya.
3. Obstruct, O darbhá, my rivals; obstruct those etc. etc.
The comm. glosses the verb (after the dhātupāṭha) with āvṛṇu nirodhaṁ kuru. The Pet. Lex. ⌊s.v. 3 ru 'zerschlagen'⌋ suggests reading instead rudhí "according to mss."; but rudhí is found in only one ms., in a, while the same ms. has rundhí in b, c, d; rudhí is accordingly only a careless misreading. Ppp. has bhaṅkti.
4. Kill, O darbhá, my rivals; kill those etc. etc.
5. Grind, O darbhá, my rivals; grind those etc. etc.
About half the mss. accent manthá. The comm. gives, as if from the dhātupāṭha, mantha loḍane (Westergaard and Böhtlingk viloḍane).
6. Crush (piṣ), O darbhá, my rivals; crush those etc. etc.
Ppp. reads piṇḍi.
7. Scorch (uṣ), O darbhá, my rivals; scorch those etc. etc.
The majority of mss. combine in a-b me óṣa, and SPP. follows them.
8. Burn, O darbhá, my rivals; burn those etc. etc.
The decided majority of mss. accent dahá.
9. Slay, O darbhá, my rivals; slay those etc. etc.
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book XIX/Hymn 30

30. For protection etc.: with an amulet of darbhá.
[As 28. pañcakam.]
Found also in Pāipp. xiii., with the two preceding, and, according to the comm., associated with them in use.
Translated: Griffith, ii. 287. ⌊☞ See p. 1045.⌋
1. What thou hast that brings death in old age, O darbhá, that has hundred-fold defense, good defense, therewith having made this man defended (varmín), smite thou my rivals by thy heroisms.
The translation implies jarā́mṛtyu çatávarma suvárma te, which is the text of neither edition, nor of the mss., nor of the comm., but simply what makes best sense with least departure from the mss. The mss. all give -tyuḥ çatáṁ vármasu ⌊W's B. varmasu⌋ (p. várma॰su) várma te; the comm. has jarāmṛtyuçatam marmasu (explaining jarasām mṛtyūnāṁ ca çataṁ granthiṣu!). The te in b had to be omitted in translating.
2. A hundred are thy defenses, O darbhá, a thousand thy heroisms; as such, all the gods have given thee to this man to wear, in order to [attain] old age.
Ppp. has at the end dadus. The comm. (with two of SPP's mss.) again reads in a marmāṇi. The decided majority of mss. have tvám at beginning of c; none of ours collated before publication had tám, which is doubtless the true text, and is read ⌊by W's O. and⌋ by SPP. and by the comm.
3. Thee they call the gods' defense, thee, O darbhá, Brahmaṇaspati; thee they call Indra's defense; thou defendest kingdoms.
The majority of mss. leave devavarma unaccented. We are tempted to emend to -páteḥ in b. Ppp. reads ⌊presumably in c⌋ tvām indrād devavarmā ”hus.
​4. A destroyer of our rivals, O darbhá, burner of the heart of our hater—an amulet, increaser of dominion, protector of thy body, I make for thee.
Emendation to darbhám in a would relieve the anacoluthon of the verse. The comm., to get rid of it, first explains te as = tvā; but then secondly connects the whole verse into one sentence leaving darbha out. ⌊I am not quite clear as to whether he means to leave it out. He says: atha vā rakṣākāmaḥ puruṣaḥ sambodhyate: he rājan darbhamaṇiṁ sapatnakṣayaṇādisāmarthyopetaṁ te tubhyaṁ kṣatrasya vardhanaṁ tanūpānaṁ ca kṛṇomī ’ti sambandhanīyam.⌋
5. What the ocean roared (krand) against, [and] Parjanya with the lightning, therefrom was born the golden drop (bindú), therefrom the darbhá.
Our edition emends in a to samudré, which is doubtless an improvement, but not necessary. ⌊The translation follows the mss., SPP., and comm., which have samudró: Ppp. samudro ‘bhya-.⌋ The comm. derives the word (as many times elsewhere) from sam-ud-dravanti, and makes it an epithet of parjanyas, which he explains as meaning meghas. Most of the mss. accent bíndus. The comm. makes the second tatas refer to bindu, but gives no opinion as to the meaning of the latter. ⌊Ppp. reads vindus in c.⌋ ⌊Cf. Pischel, ZDMG. xxxvi. 135, who thinks the "drop" refers to pearl: cf. introduction to iv. 10.⌋
# Bissell v. Township of Spring Valley

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Bissell v. Township of Spring Valley."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Bissell v. Township of Spring Valley (110 U.S. 162)
* Bissell v. Township of Spring Valley (124 U.S. 225)
# Bissell v. Township of Spring Valley (124 U.S. 225)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
124 U.S. 225
Bissell v. Township of Spring Valley
Alfred Ennis and Wm. Burry, for plaintiff in error.
W. H. Rossington, J. R. Hallowell, and Charles B. Smith, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice FIELD, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corporation

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
349 U.S. 85
Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corporation
Argued: Feb. 28, 1955. --- Decided: May 16, 1955
Mr. Eberhard P. Deutsch, New Orleans, La., for petitioner.
Mr. Ralph S. Spritzer, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Counsel

Stephen H. Oleskey argued the causes for appellants in Nos. 05-5062, et al. With him on the briefs were Louis R. Cohen, Robert C. Kirsch, Douglas F. Curtis, Mark C. Fleming, Wesley R. Powell, Julia Symon, and Christopher Land.
James F. Fitzpatrick, Leslie M. Hill, and Graham J. Jenkins were on the brief for amicus curiae Global Rights in support of appellants in Nos. 05-5062, et al.
Thomas B. Wilner argued the causes for the appellees/cross-appellants in Nos. 05-5064, et al. With him on the briefs were Barbara J. Olshansky, Joe Margulies, Neil H. Koslowe, Jared A. Goldstein, L. Barrett Boss, Adrian Lee Steel, Jr., Baher Azmy, Shayana Devendra Kadidal, Barry J. Pollak, Eric M. Freedman, Richard J. Wilson, George Brent Mickum, IV, Douglas James Behr, Erwin Chemerinsky, Jonathan L. Hafetz, Muneer I. Ahmad, Pamela Rogers Chepiga, Ralph A. Taylor, Seth B. Waxman, Kevin B. Bedell, David H. Remes, Marc Falkoff, Marc A. Goldman, David J. Cynamon, and Osman Handoo.
Wesley R. Powell and Christopher C. Land were on the brief of amicus curiae Omar Deghayes in support of the detainees.
Morton Sklar was on the brief of amicus curiae The World Organization for Human Rights USA in support of the detainees.
David Overlock Stewart was on the brief of amici curiae Legal and Historical Scholars in support of the detainees.
Jonathan L. Hafetz was on the brief of amici curiae British and American Habeas Scholars in support of the detainees.
Steven T. Wax, Federal Public Defender, Stephen R. Sady, Ruben L. Iniguez, and Amy Baggio, Chief Deputies Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender for the District of Oregon, and A.J. Kramer, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender for the District of Columbia, were on the brief for amicus curiae Federal Public Defender Habeas Corpus Counsel in support of the detainees.
Eugene R. Fidell and Ronald W. Meister were on the brief for amicus curiae the National Institute of Military Justice in support of the detainees.
Gregory G. Katsas, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for the United States of America, et al. in Nos. 05-5062, et al. and 05-5064, et al. With him on the briefs were Paul D. Clement, Solicitor General, Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, and Douglas N. Letter, Robert M. Loeb, Eric D. Miller, and Catherine Y. Hancock, Attorneys. Kenneth L. Wainstein, U.S. Attorney at the time the briefs were filed, entered an appearance.
Daniel J. Popeo and Richard A. Samp were on the brief of amici curiae Washington Legal Foundation and Allied Educational Foundation in support of the United States of America.
# III.

Federal courts have no jurisdiction in these cases. In supplemental briefing after enactment of the DTA, the government asked us not only to decide the habeas jurisdiction question, but also to review the merits of the detainees’ designation as enemy combatants by their Combatant Status Review Tribunals. See DTA § 1005(e)(2). The detainees objected to converting their habeas appeals to appeals from their Tribunals. In briefs filed after the DTA became law and after the Supreme Court decided Hamdan, they argued that we were without authority to do so. Even if we have authority to convert the habeas appeals over the petitioners’ objections, the record does not have sufficient information to perform the review the DTA allows. Our only recourse is to vacate the district courts’ decisions and dismiss the cases for lack of jurisdiction.
So ordered.
# Bouldin v. Massie's

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
20 U.S. 122
Bouldin v. Massie's

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Boumediene v. Bush

* related portals: American case law.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Contents

* Case Information
* Counsel
* Panel Information
* Opinion of the Court
   * I
   * II
   * III
   * Footnotes
* Dissenting Opinion
   * I
      * A
      * B
      * C
   * II
   * Footnotes
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Boumediene v. Bush/Case Info
## Case Information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
Argued September 8, 2005 Decided February 20, 2007
No. 05-5062
LAKHDAR BOUMEDIENE, DETAINEE, CAMP DELTA, ET AL., APPELLANTS
v. GEORGE W. BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL., APPELLEES
Consolidated with 05-5063
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 04cv01142) (No. 04cv01166)
No. 05-5064
KHALED A. F. AL ODAH, NEXT FRIEND OF FAWZI KHALID ABDULLAH FAHAD AL ODAH ET AL., APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES
Consolidated with 05-5095, 05-5096, 05-5097, 05-5098, 05-5099, 05-5100, 05-5101, 05-5102, 05-5103, 05-5104, 05-5105, 05-5106, 05-5107, 05-5108, 05-5109, 05-5110, 05-5111, 05-5112, 05-5113, 05-5114, 05-5115, 05-5116
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 02cv00828) (No. 02cv00299) (No. 02cv01130) (No. 02cv01135) (No. 02cv01136) (No. 02cv01137) (No. 02cv01144) (No. 02cv01164) (No. 02cv01194) (No. 02cv01227) (No. 02cv01254)
# Brooksmith

* "Brooksmith" in Harper's Weekly 35 (2 May 1891): 321–323.
    — US magazine publication, published simultaneously with UK magazine publication; texts identical.
* "Brooksmith" in Black and White 1 (2 May 1891): 417–420, 422.
    — UK magazine publication, published simultaneously with US magazine publication; texts identical.
* "Brooksmith" in The Lesson of the Master, The Marriages, The Pupil, Brooksmith, The Solution, Sir Edmund Orme (New York & London: Macmillan & Co., 1892): 180–201.
    — American issue of the first book edition.
* "Brooksmith" in The Lesson of the Master, The Marriages, The Pupil, Brooksmith, The Solution, Sir Edmund Orme (London & New York: Macmillan & Co., 1892): 180–201.
    — English issue of the first book edition
* "Brooksmith" in The Lesson of the Master, The Marriages, The Pupil, Brooksmith, The Solution, Sir Edmund Orme (Leipzig: Heinemann & Balestier, 1892): ?–?.
    — A Continental edition; Volume 135 of The English Library.
* "Brooksmith" in The Lesson of the Master, The Marriages, The Pupil, Brooksmith, The Solution, Sir Edmund Orme (London: Macmillan & Co., 1893): ?–?.
    — A Colonial edition; Volume 148 of Macmillan's Colonial Library.
* "Brooksmith" in The Novels and Tales of Henry James 18 (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 190?): 349–372.
    — The "New York Edition"; revised for publication by James; this is the last revised version published in James' lifetime.
* "Brooksmith" in Daisy Miller, Pandora, The Patagonia, and Other Tales (London: Macmillan & Co., 1923): 309–330.
    — Volume 23 of The Novels and Stories of Henry James, the first posthumous collection of James' works; uses the "New York Edition" text.
# Broom v. Armstrong

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
137 U.S. 266
Broom v. Armstrong

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Brooks v. United States (337 U.S. 49)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
337 U.S. 49
Brooks v. United States (337 U.S. 49)
Argued: March 2, 1949. --- Decided: May 16, 1949
Mr. W. S. Blakeney, of Charlotte, N.C., for petitioners.
Mr. Paul A. Sweeney, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Brooks v. United States (267 U.S. 432)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
267 U.S. 432
Brooks v. United States
Argued: Jan. 30, 1925. --- Decided: March 9, 1925
Mr. Joe Kirby, of Sioux Falls, S. D., for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 433-434 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Donovan, for the United States.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Broome v. United States/Dissent Campbell

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Campbell
United States Supreme Court
56 U.S. 143
Broome v. United States
Mr. Justice CAMPBELL.
I dissent from the judgment of the court in this case.
The certificate of the Comptroller of the Treasury, of his approval of a bond which it is made his duty to accept on behalf of the government, is the best evidence of the time of its delivery, as a valid and operative obligation. If another date is asserted by the government, the burden of sustaining it by clear proof, devolves upon it.
The instruction to the jury by the District Judge, 'that the time of the approval of the bond, at the Treasury Department, is not to be taken as the time of delivery,' was, in my opinion, too general, and is erroneous.
The District Judge further instructed the jury, that although the bond 'may not have come to the hands of the officers of the government' till after the death of one of the obligors, yet 'if they had parted with it for the purpose of sending it, or having it sent to Washington city, before that time,' that would charge the legal representative of the person who had died.
The delivery of a bond is only complete when it has been accepted by the obligee, or a third person, 'for, and in his behalf, and to his use.'
The terms I have quoted from the Touchstone, imply a cession of the title to the paper in the act of delivery.
The third person, who thus represents the obligee, is not subject to the mandate of the obligor, nor amenable to his control.
The instructions of the District Judge would be satisfied by any surrender of the custody of the paper, if for the purpose of having it sent to Washington city; whether it be to the agent or servant of the obligors, who would be subject to their orders, or by its inclosure in a letter, the delivery of which might be countermanded; in other words, by acts which did not amount to a surrender of the property or legal right to control the paper. This, in my opinion, was erroneous. With respect for the opinion of this court, I enter, therefore, my dissent to the judgment which affirms these instructions.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Brooks v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Brooks v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Brooks v. United States (267 U.S. 432)
* Brooks v. United States (337 U.S. 49)
See also United States v. Brooks.
# By Reef and Palm

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
“The loves of white men and brown women, often cynical and brutal, sometimes exquisitely tender and pathetic, necessarily fill a large space in any true picture of the South Sea Islands, and Mr. Becke, no doubt of set artistic purpose, has confined himself in the collection of tales now offered almost entirely to this facet of the life.” (From the introduction by the Earl of Pembroke.)
By Reef & Palm by Louis Becke
London T. Fisher Unwin L$^{td}$ Adelphi Terrace
First Edition 1894
Second Impression 1894
Third Impression 1895
Fourth Impression 1895
Fifth Impression 1898
Sixth Impression 1913
Seventh Impression 1916
[All rights reserved.]

### CONTENTS

* page
* Introduction 1
* Challis the Doubter 18
* “’Tis in the Blood” 33
* The Revenge of Macy O’Shea 42
* The Rangers of Tia Kau 56
* Pallou’s Taloi 66
* A Basket of Bread-Fruit 79
* Enderby’s Courtship 89
* Long Charley’s Good Little Wife 105
* The Methodical Mr. Burr of Majuru 115
* A Truly Great Man 128
* The Doctor’s Wife 137
* The Fate of the Alida 148
* The Chilian Bluejacket 181
* Brantley of Vahitahi 220
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Madhurāpuria

​Madhurāpuria. — A name frequently given by members of the Bhatta sub-division of Gaudo.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Maggam

​Maggam. — Maggam, Magga, and Maggada, meaning loom, have been recorded as exogamous septs of Kurubas, Mālas, and Holeyas, some of whom are weavers.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Mahankudo

​Mahankudo. — A title of Gaudo and Gudiya. The headman of the latter caste goes by this name.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Madivāla

​Madivāla. —See Agasa.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Mahanti

​Mahanti.___Mahanti is, in the Madras Census Report, 1901, defined as "a caste akin to the Koronos or Karnams (writers and accountants). The name is sometimes taken by persons excommunicated from other castes." The word means great, or prestige. According to a note submitted to me, the Mahantis gradually ​became Karnams, with the title of Patnaik, but there is no intermarriage between them and the higher classes of Karnams. The Mahantis of Orissa are said to still maintain their respectability, whereas in Ganjam they have as a class degenerated, so much so that the term Mahanti is now held up to ridicule.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Magili

​Magili (Pandanus fascicularis). — A gōtra of Tsākalas and Panta Reddis, by whom the products of the tree may not be touched. The Panta Reddi women of this gōtra will not, like those of other castes, use the flower-bracts for the purpose of adorning themselves. There is a belief, in Southern India, that the fragrant male inflorescence harbours a tiny snake, which is more deadly than the cobra, and that incautious smelling thereof may lead to death.