OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 11/A summer day at Hampstead

A SUMMER DAY AT HAMPSTEAD.
A song, now or lately very popular, enunciates an undoubted truth, when it says that, of all the suburbs of this great metropolis,
Hampstead's the place to ruralize.
Standing, for the most part, on ground that rises to about the level of the cross of St. Paul's, on the edge of a gravelly and sandy heath which has been dug at various times into the most eccentric shapes, the whole parish presents an appearance of picturesqueness which the demon of brick and mortar will find it difficult altogether to destroy for many a long year to come. The tenure of land at Hampstead is also for the most part copyhold, a fact which presents a firm stand against all modern "improvements" in street building, so that in all probability the twentieth century will look upon some at least of the old red-brick mansions and high-pitched roofs which delight our eyes at the present day with a pleasing variety, and are not easily to be found elsewhere within four miles of Oxford Street. Hence Hampstead has always been comparatively classic ground, the favourite haunt and home of poets and painters and artists. For where, within the magic circle of Sir Rowland Hill's suburban postal district, can our Herberts and our Stanfields find such "bits" and effects, such foregrounds and distances, as are to be found in the fields and lanes which fringe that undulating Heath? Long may that heath remain sacred and intact, the fairest of pleasure grounds for the North-London cockney on Sundays and Mondays, and of rosy Hampstead children and their nurserymaids the other five days of the week.
Hampstead is in every respect a watering-place,—except in there being no sea there. With that important drawback, it possesses all the necessary attributes: it has its donkeys, its bath-chairs, its fashionable esplanade, its sand and sandpits, its chalybeate spring, its "eligible" houses "to be let furnished," its more humble "apartments;" its "Vale of Health," where "parties" can be supplied with "hot water for tea," at various prices, from 2d. to 4d. per head; and last, not least, its fancy stationers' shop, with the proper supply of ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/185 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/186 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/187 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/188 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/189
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 11/A poetical barber

​ ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/629 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/630 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/631
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 11/A summer day at St. David's

​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/492 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/493 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/494 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/495 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/496 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/497 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/498 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/499
# People v. Commissioners

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
104 U.S. 466
People v. Commissioners
ERROR to the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. H Charles Ulman for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. J. A. Beall, contra.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# People v. Central Railroad

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
79 U.S. 455
People v. Central Railroad

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# People v. Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
94 U.S. 415
People v. Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments
ERROR to the Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
he relator, the Gallatin National Bank of the city of New York, was, prior to 1864, a State bank, incorporated under the general banking laws of New York. It surrendered that charter, and was reorganized as a national bank, under the act of Congress of June 3, 1864, 13 Stat. 99, known as the National Banking Act, and c. 97 of the laws of 1865 of New York, known as the 'Enabling Act,' with a capital of $1,500,000, divided into thirty thousand shares of $50 each.
The bank has reserved from profits $300,000. It also holds, on deposit with the treasurer, bonds of the United States of the par value of $591,000, on which the premium, estimated at twenty per cent, would be $118,200; so that the bank has, in addition to its capital, a surplus of $418,200.
The commissioners of taxes and assessments of the city of New York having signified their intention to tax this surplus, the president of the bank made a statement of its condition. Its capital and surplus were shown to be $1,918,200, which, on a division, would make each share $63.60. As those bonds were liable to daily and almost hourly fluctuation, and so might slightly exceed the estimate, he made affidavit that the value of each share did not exceed $64.
Thereupon the commissioners, deducting $5 per share as the proportion of the assessed value of the bank's real estate, took $59 as the valuation of each share, and imposed the tax accordingly. The relator, to test the validity of such assessment, sued out of the Supreme Court of the State a writ of certiorari, which, upon a hearing, was quashed; and it thereupon appealed to the Court of Appeals, where the judgment below was affirmed. It then brought the case here.
The statutes bearing upon the question at issue are set forth in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Daniel D. Lord for the appellant.
The surrender by the Gallatin Bank of its original charter, and its reorganization under the National Bank Law, in conformity with the Enabling Act of New York, formed a contract with the State, limiting, for taxable purposes, the assessment of the shares of the bank to their par value. This contract is as much protected by art. 10 of the Constitution of the United States as are contracts between individuals. Prov. Bank v. Billings, 4 Pet. 514; Gordon v. Tax Court, 3 How. 133; Piqua Bank v. Knoop, 16 id. 369; Ohio Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. De Bolt, 16 id. 416; Jefferson Bank v. Skelly, 1 Black, 436; Home of the Friendless v. Rouse, 8 Wall. 430; Wash. University v. Rouse, id. 439.
Mr. Hugh L. Cole, contra.
MR. JUSTICE HUNT delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# People v. Central Railroad/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
79 U.S. 455
People v. Central Railroad
THIS was a motion to dismiss, for want of jurisdiction, a writ of error to the Supreme Court of New York; the case being thus:
In 1833 an agreement was made between New York and New Jersey, relative to the boundary line between the two States, to which Congress gave its assent by an act approved June 28th, 1834. The subject of the agreement was 'all the waters of the bay of New York, . . . and all the waters of the Hudson River lying west of Manhattan Island, and to the south of the mouth of Spuyten Duyvel Creek, and of the lands covered by the said waters to the low water-mark on the westerly or New Jersey side thereof.' In this condition of things suit was brought in one of the courts of New York by the People of the State of New York against the Central Railroad Company for a nuisance committed by taking possession without license from the State of about 800 acres of land and water, and erecting docks, wharves, piers, and other improvements within the alleged jurisdiction of New York, under this agreement.
The railroad company asserted that, under the agreement, the land and water were within the jurisdiction of the State of New Jersey, by whose authority they committed the acts complained of, and the highest tribunal of the State of New York decided in favor of the claim of the railroad company in behalf of the State of New Jersey. To that judgment the writ of error which it was now sought to have dismissed was taken.
In support of the motion to dismiss, Mr. F. T. Frelinghuysen insisted that in this decision of the court in New York there was not drawn in question the construction of any statute of the United States, and that the decision was not against the title, right, privilege, or exemption specially set up and claimed under any such statute. The controversy related wholly to the extent of the jurisdiction of New York over the land and water in the rivers and bay of New York, and presented nothing but a question of construction of the agreement.
On the other hand it was argued, by Messrs. J. C. Dimick and A. J. Parker, against the motion, that the decision was against the rights of New York, as defined by the agreement, and that this court had jurisdiction because of the act giving the assent of Congress to it.
We think that the statement of the case shows that the question arose under the agreement and not under any act of Congress. The assent of Congress did not make the act giving it a statute of the United States, in the sense of the 25th section of the Judiciary Act. The construction of the act was in no way drawn in question, nor has any title or right been set up under it and denied by the State court. It had no effect beyond giving the consent of Congress to the compact between the two States.
DISMISSED.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
321 U.S. 342
Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency
Argued: Nov. 10, 1943. --- Decided: Feb 28, 1944
Mr. William G. McRae, of Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner.
Mr. Blair Foster, of Atlanta, Ga., for respondent.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Oregon Historical Quarterly/Volume 29
## Volume 29, No. 1 (Mar. 1928)

* The Influence of American Settlements upon the Oregon Boundary Treaty of 1846. by Leslie M. Scott
* A History of Bandon and the Coquille River. by George Bennett
* Report of Lieutenant Peel on Oregon in 1845-46. by Leslie M. Scott
* The Journey to Oregon -- A Pioneer Girl's Diary. by intro. and ed. by Claire Warner Churchill

## Volume 29, No. 2 (June 1928)

* History of Pioneer Sheep Husbandry in Oregon. by Alfred L. Lomax
* Indian Diseases As Aids to Pacific Northwest Settlement. by Leslie M. Scott
* Captain Gray's First Visit to Oregon. by T. C. Elliott
* Haswell's Log of a Voyage Round the World on the Ship Columbia Rediviva and the Sloop Washington. by T. C. Elliott
* The Diary of Henry Bridgeman Brewer: Being a Log of the Lausanne and the Time-Book of The Dalles Mission. by intro. and ed. by John M. Canse
* On the Plains in 1852. by J. Neilson Barry
* "Reviews" [2, including OGN]. by David W. Hazen, F. G. Young

## Volume 29, No. 3 (Sept. 1928)

* Historical Review, Champoeg, the Plymouth Rock of the Northwest. by Peter H. D'Arcy
* The Oregonian Newspaper in Oregon History. by Leslie M. Scott
* Devine Monument Dedication. by Lewis A. McArthur
* Dedication Address. by John W. Biggs
* The Letters of Roselle Putnam. by trans. and notes by Sheba Hargreaves
* Captain Cook's Approach to Oregon, by T. C. Elliott
* John Meares' Approach to Oregon, by T. C. Elliott
* The Log of the Lausanne--II. ed. by J. M. Canse
* "Notes and Comment"

## Volume 29, No. 4 (Dec. 1928)

* Superstitions and Ceremonies of Indians of Old Oregon. by John Gill
* Autobiographical Sketch of William Henry Rector. by intro. by Fred Lockley
* Journal of Captain Charles Bishop of the "Ruby" in 1795. by intro. and notes by T. C. Elliott
* The Log of the Lausanne-III. by notes and comm. by J. M. Canse
* Historic Markers. by Lewis A. McArthur
* For an Oregon Pioneers Centennial Memorial: A Project of Survey and Planning [rep. from Commonwealth Review]. by F. G. Young

## Index

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Oregon Historical Quarterly/Volume 28

Until all articles are transcribed on Wikisource, here are JSTOR scans from Volume 28 of the OHQ.

## Volume 28, No. 1 (Mar. 1927)

* Nova Albion and New England. by Samuel Eliot Morison
* England and Oregon Treaty of 1846. by Henry Commager
* The Currency Question in Oregon during the Civil War Period. by Joseph Ellison
* The Indians of Oregon--Geographic Distribution of Linguistic Families. by J. Neilson Barry
* "Book Review" [1]. by Thomas A. McBride
* "Oregon Geographic Names". by Lewis A. McArthur

## Volume 28, No. 2 (June 1927)

* New England and the Opening of the Columbia River Salmon Trade, 1830. by Samuel Eliot Morison
* The Western Sea in the Jesuit Relations. by C. S. Kingston
* The Indians in Washington, Their Distribution by Languages. by J. Neilson Barry
* "Oregon Geographic Names". by Lewis A. McArthur

## Volume 28, No. 3 (Sept. 1927)

* Frederick V. Holman: An Appreciation. by N. J. Levinson
* Gleanings from the Story of Our Oregon Pioneers. by Hon. George M. Brown
* Journal and Report by Dr. Marcus Whitman of His Tour of Exploration with Rev. Samuel Parker in 1835 beyond the Rocky Mountains. by intro. and notes by F. G. Young
* The Journal of the Ship Ruby. by T. C. Elliott
* "Oregon Geographic Names". by Lewis A. McArthur
* "News and Comment". by Barbara C. Elliott

## Volume 28, No. 4 (Dec. 1927)

* A History of Bandon and the Coquille River [from ca. 1900]. by George Bennett
* Tribal Distribution in Southwestern Oregon. by Leslie Spier
* The Oregon Pioneers and the Boundary [rep. from AHR]. by Frederick Merk
* La Verendrye Journals and Letters--A Review. by Charles H. Carey
* "News and Comment". by Barbara Coit Elliott
* The 1928 Anniversaries for Oregon. by F. G. Young
* "Correction"

## Index

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Oregon Historical Quarterly/Volume 3

The original compilation of the four numbers of Volume 3 includes a "Subject Index" and "Authors' Index" (at the beginning) and a "Topical Index" (at the end). The search box on the main Oregon Historical Quarterly page offers similar functionality.

## Number 1 (March)

* The Social Evolution of Oregon. by James R. Robertson
* Political History of Oregon from 1865 to 1876 (part 2). by Wm. D. Fenton
* History of the Barlow Road. by Mary S. Barlow [from "Recollections of Seventy Years," by William Barlow]
* Across the Continent Seventy Years Ago. by John Ball [extracts from the journal of John Ball, compiled by his daughter, Kate N. B. Powers]

## Number 2 (June)

* Political History of Oregon from 1876-1898 Inclusive. by M. C. George
* The First Oregon Cavalry. by Frances Fuller Victor
* Recollections of Horace Holden. by H. S. Lyman

## Number 3 (September)

* Sheep Husbandry in Oregon, by John Minto
* The Origin and History of the Willamette Woolen Factory, by L. E. Pratt
* "The American Fur Trade in the Far West". Review by Frances Fuller Victor
* Reminiscences of James Jory. by H. S. Lyman
* Recollections of Grandma Brown. by Jane Kinney Smith/H. S. Lyman
* Daniel Knight Warren. by H. S. Lyman
* "Documents" [mouth of Columbia exploration]

## Number 4 (December)

* The Oregon Central Railroad. by Joseph Gaston
* History of the Press of Oregon, 1839–1850. by George H. Himes
* The Archives of Oregon. by F. G. Young
* "Documents" ["Oregon meetings" throughout the country, letter of Tallmadge B. Wood, letters of Peter H. Burnett]
* "Review" of Dye's The Conquest
* Historian of the Northwest: A Woman Who Loved Oregon. by William A. Morris [from pamphlet "In Memoriam"]

## Topical Index

    Not transcribed
THE
QUARTERLY
OF THE
OREGON HISTORICAL SOCIETY
VOLUME III
MARCH, 1902–DECEMBER, 1902
EDITED BY FREDERIC GEORGE YOUNG
W. H. LEEDS, STATE PRINTER
SALEM, OREGON
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Owen Wingrave

* "Owen Wingrave" in The Graphic (28 November 1892) (Christmas Number): 11, 14, 15, 18, 22, 26, 30.
    — First publication in any form
* "Owen Wingrave" in The Private Life, The Wheel of Time, Lord Beaupré, The Visits, Collaboration, Owen Wingrave (London: James R. Osgood, McIlvaine & Co., 1893): 279–331.
    — First English book edition.
* "Owen Wingrave" in The Wheel of Time, Collaboration, Owen Wingrave (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1893): 145–220.
    — First American book edition
* "Owen Wingrave" in The Novels and Tales of Henry James 17: 269–319.
    — The "New York Edition"; revised for publication by James; this is the last revised version published in James' lifetime.
* "Owen Wingrave" in The Altar of the Dead, The Beast in the Jungle, The Birthplace, and Other Tales (London: Macmillan & Co., 1922): 237–283.
    — Volume 22 of The Novels and Stories of Henry James, the first posthumous collection of James' works; uses the "New York Edition" text.
# Owen v. Dudley

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
217 U.S. 488
Owen v. Dudley
Argued: April 7, 8, 1910. --- Decided: May 16, 1910
Mr. William H. Robeson for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Charles Poe and Samuel A. Putman for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Owen Glyndwr's War-Song

* Owen Glyndwr's War Song, in Poetical Remains of the Late Mrs Hemans, 1836.
* Owen Glyndwr's War-Song, in Poems of Felicia Hemans, Blackwood, 1872.
This was originally a song in Welsh Melodies, Volume 2, 1822.
# Owen v. Arizona

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
378 U.S. 574
Owen v. Arizona
Petitioners pro se.
Robert W. Pickrell, Atty. Gen. of Arizona, and Norman E. Green, for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Owen v. Arizona/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
378 U.S. 574
Owen v. Arizona
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Arizona are vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774.
Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice CLARK, Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Plan for Allocation of the Number of Deputies to the Fourteenth National People's Congress

* information about this edition.
* related portals: Law of China.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
(Adopted at the 34th Meeting of the Standing Committee of the Thirteenth National People's Congress on April 20, 2022)
In accordance with the Decision of the Fifth Session of the Thirteenth National People's Congress on the Number of Deputies to the Fourteenth National People's Congress and the Election of the Deputies, the total number of deputies to the Fourteenth National People's Congress shall not exceed 3,000. The specific allocation plan shall be as follows:
Beijing Municipality 40, Tianjin Municipality 31, Hebei Province 116, Shanxi Province 60, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 53, Liaoning Province 86, Jilin Province 53, Heilongjiang Province 76, Shanghai Municipality 48, Jiangsu Province 133, Zhejiang Province 89, Anhui Province 103, Fujian Province 66, Jiangxi Province 76, Shandong Province 159, Henan Province 160, Hubei Province 103, Hunan Province 109, Guangdong Province 160, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 87, Hainan Province 22, Chongqing Municipality 55, Sichuan Province 136, Guizhou Province 69, Yunnan Province 87, Tibet Autonomous Region 20, Shaanxi Province 65, Gansu Province 48, Qinghai Province 20, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region 20, Xingjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 56, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region 36, Macao Special Administrative Region 12, and the Chinese People's Liberation Army and the Chinese People's Armed Police Force 278, and 13 deputies being temporarily allocated to Taiwan Province. The other 255 shall be allocated by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress in accordance with the law.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Pacific Exp. Company v. Malin

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Pacific Exp. Company v. Malin."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Pacific Exp. Company v. Malin (131 U.S. 394)
* Pacific Exp. Company v. Malin (132 U.S. 531)
# Pacific Exp. Company v. Malin (131 U.S. 394)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
131 U.S. 394
Pacific Exp. Company v. Malin
This case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Mr. Phillips, for defendant in error, afterwards moved for the issuance of a mandate, and stating that no notice of the motion for the mandate had been served on the opposite party, but that no opposition had been made to the dismissal of the case.
PER CURIAM.
Sufficient cause has been shown, and the mandate may issue at once. Mandate issued.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pacific Exp. Company v. Malin (132 U.S. 531)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
132 U.S. 531
Pacific Exp. Company v. Malin
John Johns and D. A. McKnight, for plaintiff in error.
W. Hallett Phillips, for defendants in error.
FULLER, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse