OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Stratton v. Stratton

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
239 U.S. 55
Stratton v. Stratton
Argued: October 25, 1915. --- Decided: November 8, 1915
Messrs. Addison C. Lewis and David M. Gruber for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. D. A. Hollingsworth, C. A. Vail, and E. E. Erskine for defendant in error.
Memorandum opinion by Mr. Chief Justice White, by direction of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Stratton's Independence v. Howbert

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
231 U.S. 399
Stratton's Independence v. Howbert
Argued: October 21, 1913. --- Decided: December 1, 1913
Messrs. William V. Hodges, A. A. Hoehling, Jr., and John R. Van Derlip for Stratton's Independence.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 400-404 intentionally omitted]
Assistant Attorney General Graham for Howbert, Collector.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 404-406 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Charles S. Thomas, W. H. Bryant, George L. Nye, William P. Malburn, William Story, William Story, Jr., and William D. Guthrie as amici curiae.
Mr. Justice Pitney delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company (282 U.S. 10)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
282 U.S. 10
Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company
Argued: Oct. 28, 1930. --- Decided: Nov 24, 1930
[Syllabus from pages 10-12 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. B. L. Catron, of Springfield, Ill., and Oscar E. Carlstrom, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Messrs. Josiah Whitnel, of East St. Louis, Ill., and J. R. Turney, of St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sheldon v. Fannin/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 228
Sheldon v. Fannin
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Shelby County v. Union Planters' Bank

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
161 U.S. 149
Shelby County v. Union Planters' Bank
S. P. Walker, for appellants.
Wm. H. Carroll, for appellee.
Mr. Justice PECKHAM delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Shelby v. Guy

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
24 U.S. 361
Shelby v. Guy
Feb. 28th.
THIS cause was argued by Mr. Jones, for the plaintiffs in error, and by the Attorney General and Mr. White, for the defendant in error. March 10th.
Mr. Justice JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sheldon v. Fannin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 228
Sheldon v. Fannin
Hayden C. Covington, for appellants.
Robert W. Pickrell, Atty. Gen. of Arizona, and Frank Sagarino, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sheirburn v. De Cordova

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
65 U.S. 423
Sheirburn v. De Cordova
THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the District Court of the United States for the western district of Texas.
The bill of exceptions contained the evidence of the title of Sheirburn, the plaintiff, when the defendants objected to the admissibility of said locations and entries because the same were vague, uncertain, and indefinite, and also because surveys thereon were not returned to the General Land Office; but the court overruled said objections, and the defendants excepted thereto. The plaintiffs here closed.
The objection made in this court, viz: that the plaintiff could not maintain the suit upon a head right in the court of the United States, did not appear to have been made upon the trial; but the question seemed to turn upon the validity of the title of the defendants, which was sustained; and upon that ruling the plaintiff brought the case up to this court.
It was argued by Mr. Hale for the plaintiff in error, and Mr. Paschal for the defendants, both on printed arguments.
Mr. Paschal thus brought forward the objection upon which the judgment of this court turned:1. That the plaintiff showed no standing in court-no such title in himself as would enable him to attack the mere naked possession of the defendants, much less their valid paper titles. The plaintiff showed nothing but a mere incipient equity-a naked entry-which of itself, without a survey, according to the decisions of this court, did not detach the land from the public domain.
See Vaughan v. Chesnut, 2 Wash. C. C. Rep., 160.
This case held that the mere entry was not property subject to sale.
In the case of Lessee of Sims v. Irwin, 3 Dallas, 425, (which was a great case,) the subject of entries and surveys was fully discussed, and after great difficulty the court arrived at the conclusion, that in Pennsylvania, the entry payment and survey might constitute a legal title. And in Dubois v. Newman et al., 4 Wash., 77, Mr. Justice Washington refused to go one step further.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Act 2015

* Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Act 2015 (Version 22)
* Subordinate Legislation (Confirmation and Validation) Act 2015 (Version 26)
# Sacred Books of the East/Volume 27/The Lî Kî/Tables

Transliteration of Oriental Alphabets adopted for the Translations of the Sacred Books of the East.
LONDON: HENRY FROWDE.
Oxford University Press Warehouse, Amen Corner,
OXFORD: CLARENDON PRESS DEPOSITORY,
116 High Street.
The Delegates of the Press invite suggestions and advice from all persons interested in education; and will be thankful for hints, &c. addressed to the Secretary to the Delegates, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
# Sacred Books of the East/Volume 3/The Hsiao

The table of contents is found at the front of Vol. III. For other translations and more information, see Classic of Filial Piety.
THE HSIÂO KING
OR
CLASSIC OF FILIAL PIETY.
# Sacred Books of the East/Volume 3

Translations of the Book of Documents (Shū Jīng), parts of the Book of Poetry (Shī Jīng), and the Classic of Filial Piety (Xiào Jīng).
The next part of the "Sacred Books of China" subseries is Vol. XVI.
VOL. III
Oxford
AT THE CLARENDON PRESS
1879
PART I
THE SHÛ KING THE RELIGIOUS PORTIONS OF THE SHIH KING THE HSIÂO KING
Oxford
AT THE CLARENDON PRESS
1879
CONTENTS.
# Silas Marner (1907)

Silas Marner: The Weaver of Raveloe is the third novel by George Eliot, published in 1861. An outwardly simple tale of a linen weaver, it is notable for its strong realism and its sophisticated treatment of a variety of issues ranging from religion to industrialisation to community.Warning: template has been deprecated.
This is the 1907 edition, illustrated by Hugh Thomson.
SILAS MARNER
BY
GEORGE ELIOT
WITH ILLUSTRATIONS BY
HUGH THOMSON
MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED
ST. MARTIN'S STREET LONDON
1907
MACMILLAN AND CO., Limited
LONDON • BOMBAY • CALCUTTA MELBOURNE
THE MACMILLAN COMPANY
NEW YORK • BOSTON • CHICAGO
ATLANTA • SAN FRANCISCO
THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, Ltd.
TORONTO
THE CHILDREN ALWAYS CALLED HIM 'OLD MASTER MARNER.'—P. 29.
[Frontispiece.
CONTENTS (Not included.)
PART I
PAGE
PART II
ILLUSTRATIONS
COLOURED
PAGE
IN THE TEXT
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Swift & Courtney & Beecher Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
111 U.S. 22
Swift & Courtney & Beecher Company v. United States
[Syllabus from pages 22-23 intentionally omitted]
[Statement of Case from pages 23-24 intentionally omitted]
John W. Douglass and Saml. Shellabarger, for appellant.
Sol. Gen. Phillips, for appellee.
MATTHEWS, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Swendig v. Washington Water Power Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 322
Swendig v. Washington Water Power Company
Argued: Feb. 21, 1924. --- Decided: May 26, 1924
Mr. James F. Ailshie, of Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 323-324 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Frank T. Post, of Spokane, Wash., for appellee.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Swenson v. Bosler

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
386 U.S. 258
Swenson v. Bosler
Norman H. Anderson, Atty. Gen. of Missouri, and J. Gordon Siddens and Howard L. MacFadden, Asst. Attys. Gen., for petitioner.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Swift & Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
196 U.S. 375
Swift & Company v. United States
Argued: January 6, 9, 1905. --- Decided: January 30, 1905
Messrs.John S. Miller and Merritt Starr for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 376-384 intentionally omitted]
Attorney General Moody and Mr. W. A. Day for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 385-390 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# San Francisco Call/1910/Telephone Resulted in Mill Purchase

The San Francisco Call, February 20, 1910; p.34. Digitised by the Library of Congress.
Telephone Resulted in Mill Purchase
The purchase last week of the John R. Keim mills, Buffalo, by the Ford motor company, was the result of a new telephone installed on the desk of Henry Ford about four years ago.
On the old phone, the metal upright and the base were separate. On this new phone, the entire casing was one piece draw from a single sheet of steel. The new casing looked like a miniature rear axle housing.
If machinery could manufacture small one piece telephone casings, machinery could be made to make one piece rear axle housings. So Mr. Ford hunted up the manufacturer of the telephone casings. It was the John R. Keim mills of Buffalo. Mr. Ford handed them the telephone casing with the abrupt remark, "I want 200,000 castings just like that, except larger."
# San Francisco Earthquake & Fire: April 18, 1906

* related portals: Documentary film, Silent film, Geology.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
American short black-and-white documentary silent film. The film documents the aftermath of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake. Selected for the United States National Film Registry as being deemed "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".
SAN FRANCISCO EARTHQUAKE & FIRE April 18, 1906
The first scenes that met the eye on landing.
There were ruins on every hand.
Every fireman worked to save the residential districts—and here ruins burned unchecked.
Walls were ordered razed by the authorities
St Patrick's Church, Mission Street.
At meal times, when there was food to be had, troubles were banished. The street served as both kitchen and diningroom.
Market and Powell Streets that memorable April of 1906.
| TREASURE SAN FRANCISCO | SAFE DEPOSIT VAULTS UNINJURED FROM FIRE OR WATER | OFFICE OF THE WESTERN NATIONAL BANK. |
Soldiers guarded the banks. They shot, to kill, at looters.
Man's faithful friend, the horse, worked tirelessly. There was no water, except what was brought to him by ferryboat.
Odd looking "automobiles" were still a luxury, and Old Dobbin was supreme.
First refugees were in too much haste, even to take their effects.
Women wore their Easter bonnets. Chinamen wore their queus.
Looking down Market Street. The first trolley.
First ferryboats to land at Oakland, were loaded to capacity, with refugees.
Arrival of Refugees at Oakland
San Franciscans have claimed that this is how Oakland got her start—but they're wrong.
The END
This work was published in 1906 and is anonymous or pseudonymous due to unknown authorship. It is in the public domain in the United States as well as countries and areas where the copyright terms of anonymous or pseudonymous works are 117 years or less since publication.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# San Francisco Examiner/1920/Byington Ford To Wed Girl Of Chicago

Marion Boisot (1897-1990) and Byington Ford (1890-1985) engagement in the San Francisco Examiner on November 7, 1920.
Byington Ford To Wed Girl Of Chicago. The engagement has been announced of Miss Marion Boisot, daughter of Mr. and Mrs. E. K. Boisot of Chicago, to Byington Ford, son of Mr. and Mrs. Tirey L. Ford of this city. Miss Boisot recently made her debut in Chicago and came to California early in the season and has taken an active part in the social life of the Pebble Beach and Del Monte colonies. The wedding will take this month at Pebble Beach on November 17. Mr. Ford is the brother of Mrs. Samuel F. B. Morse.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works could have had their copyright renewed between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st of the 29th year.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# San Francisco Law Journal

The San Francisco Law Journal is a periodical, published from 1877 to 1878. It is continued by the California Legal Record and the Pacific Coast Law Journal.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# San Francisco National Bank v. Dodge

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Josiah Brewer
United States Supreme Court
197 U.S. 70
San Francisco National Bank v. Dodge
Argued: November 7, 1904. --- Decided: February 27, 1905
Messrs. William S. Wood, E. S. Pillsbury, Alfred Sutro, and Lloyd & Wood for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 71-73 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. William Irwin Brobeck and Percy V. Long for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 73-75 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sceptical Chymist/Title Page 2

THE
SCEPTICAL CHYMIST
OR
CHYMICO-PHYSICAL
Doubts & Paradoxes,
Touching the EXPERIMENTS
WHEREBY VULGAR SPAGYRISTS
Are wont to Endeavour to Evince their
SALT, SULPHUR AND MERCURY,
TO BE
The True Principles of Things.
LONDON,
Printed for J. Crooke, and are to be sold at the Ship in St. Paul's Church-Yard. 1661.
# Sceptical Chymist/Title Page 1

THE
SCEPTICAL CHYMIST
OR
CHYMICO-PHYSICAL
Doubts & Paradoxes,
Touching the SPAGYRIST'S PRINCIPLES
Commonly call'd HYPOSTATICAL,
As they are wont to be Propos'd and Defended b the Generality of ALCHYMIST
Whereunto is praemis'd Part of another Discourse relating to the same Subject.
B Y
The Honourable ROBERT BOYLE, Esq;
LONDON,
Printed by J. Cadwell for J. Crooke, and are to Sold at the Ship in St. Paul's Church-Yard. M D C L X I
# Scepticism and Animal Faith

Index page: Scepticism and Animal Faith.djvu
SCEPTICISM AND ANIMAL FAITH
INTRODUCTION TO A SYSTEM OF PHILOSOPHY
BY
GEORGE SANTAYANA
NEW YORK
CHARLES SCRIBNER’S SONS
1923
CONTENTS
| | | PAGE |
| Preface | | v |
| CHAP. | | |
| I. | There is no First Principle of Criticism | 1 |
| II. | Dogma and Doubt | 6 |
| III. | Wayward Scepticism | 11 |
| IV. | Doubts about Self-Consciousness | 21 |
| V. | Doubt about Change | 27 |
| VI. | Ultimate Scepticism | 33 |
| VII. | Nothing Given exists | 42 |
| VIII. | Some Authorities for this Conclusion | 49 |
| IX. | The Discovery of Essence | 67 |
| X. | Some Uses of this Discovery | 77 |
| XI. | The Watershed of Criticism | 99 |
| XII. | Identity and Duration attributed to Essences | 109 |
| XIII. | Belief in Demonstration | 116 |
| XIV. | Essence and Intuition | 125 |
| XV. | Belief in Experience | 134 |
| XVI. | Belief in the Self | 145 |
| XVII. | The Cognitive Claims of Memory | 150 |
| XVIII. | Knowledge is Faith mediated by Symbols | 164 |
| XIX. | Belief in Substance | 182 |
| XX. | On some Objections to Belief in Substance | 192 |
| CHAP. | | PAGE |
| XXI. | Sublimations of Animal Faith | 214 |
| XXII. | Belief in Nature | 237 |
| XXIII. | Evidences of Animation in Nature | 249 |
| XXIV. | Literary Psychology | 252 |
| XXV. | The Implied Being of Truth | 262 |
| XXVI. | Discernment of Spirit | 272 |
| XXVII. | Comparison with other Criticisms of Knowledge | 289 |
| | Index | 311 |
# Slaughter v. Glenn

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
98 U.S. 242
Slaughter v. Glenn
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. W. S. Herndon for the appellants.
Mr. Isaac C. Collins, contra.
MR. JUSTICE SWAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Slav

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Slav."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
"Slavs", "The Slavs" redirect here
* "Slavs," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Slavs," in The Encyclopedia Americana, New York: The Encyclopedia Americana Corporation (1920)
* "Slavs," in The New Student's Reference Work, Chicago: F.E. Compton and Co. (1914)
* "The Slavs," in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
* "The Slavs", by Aleš Hrdlička, in The Czechoslovak Review, Volume 2 (1918)

## See also

* Hey, Slavs
# Slave Girl Comics/1

“Slave Girl Comics” #1 was published in February, 1949.

## Contents

Page 1: Cover
Page 2: Advertisement
Page 3: Malu, The Slave Girl; 8 pages; comics; Howard Larsen, art
Page 11: Malu, the Slave Girl; 7 pages; comics; Howard Larsen, art
Page 18: “The Curse of Ahmen Ra”; 2 pages; text
Page 20: Malu, the Slave Girl; 7 pages; comics; Howard Larsen, art
Page 27: Malu, the Slave Girl; 7 pages; comics; Howard Larsen, art
Page 34: Advertisement
Page 35: Advertisement
Page 36: Advertisement

## Gallery

* Page 1
* Page 2
* Page 3
* Page 4
* Page 5
* Page 6
* Page 7
* Page 8
* Page 9
* Page 10
* Page 11
* Page 12
* Page 13
* Page 14
* Page 15
* Page 16
* Page 17
* Page 18
* Page 19
* Page 20
* Page 21
* Page 22
* Page 23
* Page 24
* Page 25
* Page 26
* Page 27
* Page 28
* Page 29
* Page 30
* Page 31
* Page 32
* Page 33
* Page 34
* Page 35
* Page 36

## References

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works published in 1949 could have had their copyright renewed in 1976 or 1977, i.e. between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st, 1978.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse