OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Visitors Apostolic

From volume 15 of the work.
Officials whom canonists commonly class with papal legates. Visitors differ from other Apostolic delegates, principally in this, that their mission is only transient and of comparatively short duration. In ancient times, the popes generally exercised their right of inspecting the dioceses of various countries through their nuncios or delegates (c. 1, Extravag. Comm. de Consuet. I, 1; c. 17, X, de Cens. III, 39), though they occasionally, even in the primitive ages, sent special visitors. At the present time, the mission of papal nuncios is rather of a diplomatic than of a visitatorial character. Visitors are, at present, deputed by the pope for special emergencies and not at stated intervals. Their duty is to inspect the state of the Church in the country confided to them and then to draw up a report to the Holy See. At times, this visitation is made with the same attention to details as is an episcopal visitation. Visitors Apostolic are also appointed to visit the various provinces of a religious order, whenever, in the judgment of the pope, this becomes useful or necessary. In all cases of Apostolic visitation, the pope, through delegates, is putting into effect the supreme and immediate jurisdiction which is his for any and every part of the Church. The exact powers of a visitor can be known only from his brief of delegation. His office ceases as soon as he has submitted his report to the Holy See through the Consistorial Congregation. For the city of Rome itself there is a permanent Commission of the Apostolic Visitation. Established by Urban VIII as one of the Roman congregations under the presidency of the cardinal vicar, it was changed into a commission by Pius X through the Constitution "Sapienti Consilio" (29 June, 1908). These Apostolic visitors annually inspect the parishes and institutions of Rome and made report on their spiritual and financial condition. They pay special attention to the fulfilment of the obligations springing from pious foundations and legacies for Masses and chaplaincies.
LEITNER, De Curia Romana (Ratisbon, 1909); DE LUCA, Praelectiones Juris Canonici (Rome, 1897); MARTIN in Amer. Eccles. Review (Oct., 1910).
WILLIAM H.W. FANNING
# City of Brenham v. German American Bank/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
144 U.S. 549
City of Brenham v. German American Bank
It is ordered by the court that leave be granted to file a petition for rehearing herein, which being considered—
It is ordered by the court that the judgment entered in this court on the 28th day of March, 1892, be, and the same is hereby, vacated and set aside, and a judgment is now this day entered reversing the judgment of the circuit court of the United States for the western district of Texas, and remanding said cause for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion on this court herein before filed, and the petition for rehearing is denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# City of Boston v. Jackson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
260 U.S. 309
City of Boston v. Jackson
Submitted on Motion to Dismiss or Affirm Nov. 13, 1922.
Decided Dec. 4, 1922.
[Syllabus on page 309-310 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Nathan Matthews and J. P. Lyons, both of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. J. Weston Allen, Edwin H. Abbot, Jr., and Alexander Lincoln, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant in error.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# City of Bellaire v. Baltimore O. Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
146 U.S. 117
City of Bellaire v. Baltimore O. Railroad Company
J. A. Gallaher, for plaintiff in error.
John K. Cowen and Hugh L. Bond, Jr., for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice GRAY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# City of Boston v. Lecraw

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
58 U.S. 426
City of Boston v. Lecraw

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# City of Brenham v. German American Bank

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
144 U.S. 549
City of Brenham v. German American Bank
Error to the circuit court of the United States for the western district of Texas.
Petition for leave to file a petition for rehearing. The cause was decided March 28, 1892, and is reported in 144 U.S. 173, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 559. The following were among the grounds set forth in the petition:
'The decision visits with severity your petitioner, who, in perfect good faith, with prudence and care, invested the trust money of its depositors in what, at the time of the transaction, was universally regarded under the decisions of this court as a form of negotiable security of the safest and best character.
'In saying this, your petitioner does not mean to be understood as contending that a rehearing ought to be granted because it is a hardship to the defendant to lose the case. Your petitioner deems it a duty, as trustee for its depositors, to invite the attention of your honors to the fact that by no possible precaution could your petitioner have had warning not to make this investment; that the result is a peculiar one, inasmuch as a settled rule of law is reversed by a divided court, and innocent parties made to suffer. This fact, being brought to the court's attention, is of cumulative force to induce the court to grant a reargument.
'One word as to the order made in this case.
'The case is returned to the court below with directions to dismiss the suit and to enter a general judgment for the city of Brenham. Should the court be still of the opinion these bonds are invalid, and their vitality, if there is any, should be destroyed utterly, the consideration at the bottom of them still lives, and the city is liable for the money she raised, notwithstanding the bonds are dead. Little Rock v. National Bank, 98 U.S. 308, and cases cited. The complaint in the suit had not the common counts, and was not broad enough to reach this point, and to recover the money received by the city.
'Would not the order, if the decision upon the bonds is to stand, be more in accordance with justice if it allowed the defendant in error to amend the complaint, and sue for this money had and received? Amendments are purely within the discretion of the court in furtherance of justice. The order cuts off the right to apply in the court below to amend, and therefore it is asked here. It can scarcely be said it is just for the city to avoid her bonds and keep the money she has derived from them too. It would seem but just to modify the order, at all events, to this extent.'
A. H. Garland and H. J. May, for petitioner.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# City of Cairo v. Zane

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
149 U.S. 122
City of Cairo v. Zane

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Coffey v. United States (117 U.S. 233)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
117 U.S. 233
Coffey v. United States
Argued: March 15, 1886. ---
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Coffin Bros. Company v. Bennett

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
277 U.S. 29
Coffin Bros. Company v. Bennett
Argued: and Submitted April 17, 1928. --- Decided: April 30, 1928
Messrs. G. Y. Harrell and R. S. Wimberly, both of Lumpkin, Ga., for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Orville A. Park, of Macon, Ga., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Coffey v. Harlan

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
204 U.S. 659
Coffey v. Harlan
Argued: and submitted January 24, 1907, --- Decided: February 25, 1907
Messrs. C. C. Flansburg and R. O. Williams for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 559 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. J. W. Deweese, W. A. Myers, and W. S. Morlan for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 660 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Moody delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Coffey v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Coffey v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Coffey v. United States (116 U.S. 427)
* Coffey v. United States (117 U.S. 233)
# Code of Federal Regulations/Title 49/Chapter I/Part 172/Section 172.101/Table 01

From the National Archives and Records Administration on GPO Access, revised as of October 1, 2005.
# Code of Federal Regulations/Title 49/Chapter I/Part 172/Subpart B

From the National Archives and Records Administration on GPO Access. This table of contents has been added by WikiSource for the benefit of readers: it does not form part of the Regulations
* § 172.101 Purpose and use of hazardous materials table
** Hazardous Materials Table
*** Table (Accelerene –Allylamine)
*** Table (Allyltrichlorosilane – Ammonium sulfide)
*** Table (Ammunition – Azaurolic acid)
*** Table (Azido guanidine picrate – Bromine chloride)
*** Table (Bromine pentafluoride – Caproic acid)
*** Table (Carbamate pesticides – Chlorites, inorganic)
*** Table (1-Chloro-1,1-difluoroethane – Composition B)
*** Table (Compounds – Coumarin derivative pesticides)
** Appendix A to § 172.101—List of Hazardous Substances and Reportable Quantities
*** Table 1 to Appendix A—Hazardous Substances other than Radionuclides
*** Table 2 to Appendix B—Radionuclides
** Appendix B to § 172.101—List of Marine Pollutants
*** List of Marine Polluants
* § 172.102 Special provisions
# Code of Federal Regulations/Title 47
## Historical

* 1970 edition of the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 47
# Code of Federal Regulations/Title 47/1970

From the U.S. Government Printing Office on Google Books, revised as of January 1, 1970. (Commons file)
# Code of Federal Regulations/Title 49/Chapter I

From the U.S. Government Printing Office on GPO Access, revised October 1, 2005.
* Part 105. Hazardous Materials Program definitions and general procedures
* Part 106. Rulemaking procedures
* Part 107. Hazardous materials program procedures
* Part 110. Hazardous materials public sector training and planning grants
* Part 130. Oil spill prevention and response plans
* Part 171. General information, regulations, and definitions
* Part 172. Hazardous materials table, special provisions, hazardous materials communications, emergency response information, and training requirements
* Part 173. Shippers—general requirements for shipments and packagings
* Part 174. Carriage by rail
* Part 175. Carriage by aircraft
* Part 176. Carriage by vessel
* Part 177. Carriage by public highway
* Part 178. Specifications for packagings
* Part 179. Specifications for tank cars
* Part 180. Continuing qualification and maintenance of packagings
* Parts 181–185 Reserved
* Part 190. Pipeline safety programs and rulemaking procedures
* Part 191. Transportation of natural and other gas by pipeline; annual reports, incident reports, and safety-related condition reports
* Part 192. Transportation of natural and other gas by pipeline: minimum Federal safety standards
* Part 193. Liquefied natural gas facilities: Federal safety standards
* Part 194. Response plans for onshore oil pipelines
* Part 195. Transportation of hazardous liquids by pipeline
* Parts 196–197 Reserved
* Part 198. Regulations for grants to aid state pipeline safety programs
* Part 199. Drug and alcohol testing
# Code of Federal Regulations/Title 49

From the U.S. Government Printing Office on GPO Access, revised October 1, 2005.
Subtitle A—Office of the Secretary of Transportation (Parts 1–99) Subtitle B—Other Regulations Relating to Transportation
* Chapter I. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Department of Transportation (Parts 100–199)
* Chapter II. Federal Railroad Administration, Department of Transportation (Parts 200–299)
* Chapter III. Federal MotorCarrier Safety Administration, Department of Transportation (Parts 300–399)
* Chapter IV. Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (Parts 400–499)
** 450. General
** 451. Testing and approval of containers
** 452. Examination of containers
** 453. Control and enforcement
* Chapter V. National Highway Traffic Safety Adminstration, Department of Transportation (Parts 500–599)
* Chapter VI. Federal Transit Administration, Department of Transportation (Parts 600–699)
* Chapter VII. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) (Parts 700–799)
** 700. Organization, functioning and available information
** 701. Amtrak Freedom of Information Act program
* Chapter VIII. National Transportation Safety Board (Parts 800–999)
* Chapter X. Surface Transportation Board, Department of Transportation (Parts 1000–1399)
* Chapter XI. Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Department of Transportation (Parts 1400–1499)
** 1420. Reports of motor carriers
* Chapter XII. Transportation Security Administration, Department of Homeland Security (Parts 1500–1699)
# Code of Federal Regulations/Title 43

From the U.S. Government Printing Office on Google Books, revised as of October 1, 1992. (Commons file)
# Cato, a Tragedy

* related authors: Alexander Pope, Samuel Garth.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, quotes, Wikidata item.
page
CATO,
A
TRAGEDY,
By Mr ADDISON.
EDINBURGH:
Printed for John Wood, Bookseller in the New Exchange.
(Price Sixpence.)
page
* Prologue, by Alexander Pope
* Dramatis Personæ
* Act I
* Act II
* Act III
* Act IV
* Act V
* Epilogue, by Samuel Garth
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cato, a Tragedy/Epilogue

​EPILOGUE,
By Dr GARTH.
Spoken by Mrs PORTER.
WHAT odd fantastic Things we Women do!$\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ Who wou'd not listen when young Lovers woo, But die a Maid, yet have the Choice of Two! Ladies are often cruel to their Cost; To give you Pain, themselves they punish most. Vows of Virginity should well be weigh'd: Too oft they're cancell'd, tho' in Convents made. Wou'd you revenge such rash Resolves—you may:$\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ Be spiteful———and believe the Thing we say, We hate you when you're easily said Nay. How needless, if you knew us, were your Fears? Let Love have Eyes, and Beauty will have Ears. Our Hearts are form'd as you yourselves would chuse, Too proud to ask, too humble to refuse: We give to Merit, and to Wealth we sell; He sighs with most Success that settles well. The Woes of Wedlock with the Joys we mix: 'Tis best repenting in a Coach and Six.
Blame not our Conduct, since we but pursue Those lovely Lessons we have learn'd from you: Your Breasts no more the Fire of Beauty warms, But wicked Wealth usurps the Pow'r of Charms, What pains to get the gaudy Thing you hate, To swell in show, and be a Wretch in state! At plays you ogle, at the Ring you bow; Ev'n churches are no Sanctuaries now: There, golden Idols all your Vows receive, She is no Goddess that has nought to give: Oh, may once more the happy Age appear, When Words were artless, and the Thoughts sincere; When Gold and Grandeur were unenvy'd Things, And Courts less coveted than Groves and Springs. Love then shall only mourn when Truth complains, And Constancy feel Transport in its chains, Sighs with Success their own soft Anguish tell, And Eyes shall utter what the Lips conceal; Virtue again to its bright Station climb, And Beauty fear no Enemy but Time, The Fair shall listen to Desert alone, And every Lucia find a Cato's Son.
FINIS
# Cato v. Smith

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
308 U.S. 608
Cato v. Smith

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cato, a Tragedy/Cast

Dramatis Personæ,
MEN. :
| CATO. | CATO. | CATO. | Mr Booth. |
| Lucius, a Senator. | Lucius, a Senator. | Lucius, a Senator. | Mr Keen. |
| Sempronius, a Senator. | Sempronius, a Senator. | Sempronius, a Senator. | Mr Mills. |
| Juba, Prince of Numidia. | Juba, Prince of Numidia. | Juba, Prince of Numidia. | Mr Wilks. |
| Syphax, General of the Numidians. | Syphax, General of the Numidians. | Syphax, General of the Numidians. | Mr Cibber. |
| Portius, | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ Sons of Cato. | | Mr Powell. |
| Marcus, | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ Sons of Cato. | | Mr Rian. |
| Decius, Ambassador from Cesar. | Decius, Ambassador from Cesar. | Decius, Ambassador from Cesar. | Mr Bowman. |
| Mutineers, Guards, etc. |||||
| WOMEN. |||||
| Marcia, Daughter to Cato | Marcia, Daughter to Cato | Marcia, Daughter to Cato | Mrs Oldfield. |
| Lucia, Daughter to Lucius | Lucia, Daughter to Lucius | Lucia, Daughter to Lucius | Mrs Porter. |
| SCENE, A large Hall in the Governor's Palace of Utica. |||||
# Chippewa Indians of Minnesota v. United States (301 U.S. 358)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
301 U.S. 358
Chippewa Indians of Minnesota v. United States
Argued: Feb. 2, 1937. --- Decided: May 17, 1937
Appeal from the Court of Claims.
Messrs. Webster Ballinger, of Washington, D.C., and D. S. Holmes, of Duluth, Minn., for appellants.
Mr. Golden W. Bell, Asst. Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for appellee the United States.
Mr. Fred Dennis, of Detroit Lakes, Minn., for appellee Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians of Minnesota.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chipps of the Old Block (1659)

Chipps of the Old Block; Or, Hercules Cleansing the Augæan Stable.
To the Tune of, The Sword.
Printed at the Hague, for S. Browne, 1659.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chips of the Old Block

* "Chipps of the Old Block", broadside printing (1659)
* "Chipps of the Old Block" in Ratts Rhimed to Death (1659)
* "Chips of the Old Block" in A Collection of Loyal Songs Written Against the Rump Parliament (1731)
# Chippewa Indians of Minnesota v. United States (305 U.S. 479)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
305 U.S. 479
Chippewa Indians of Minnesota v. United States
Argued: Dec. 9-12, 1938. --- Decided: Jan 3, 1939
Mr. Webster Ballinger, of Washington, D.C., for appellants.
Mr. Raymond T. Nagle, of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chippewa Indians of Minnesota v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Chippewa Indians of Minnesota v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Chippewa Indians of Minnesota v. United States (301 U.S. 358)
* Chippewa Indians of Minnesota v. United States (305 U.S. 479)
* Chippewa Indians of Minnesota v. United States (307 U.S. 1)
# Chippewa Indians of Minnesota v. United States (307 U.S. 1)

United States Supreme Court
307 U.S. 1
Chippewa Indians of Minnesota v. United States
Argued: March 30, 1939. --- Decided: April 17, 1939
Messrs. Donald S. Holmes, of Duluth, Minn., and Webster Ballinger, of Washington, D.C., for appellants.
Mr. Raymond T. Nagle, of Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse