OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Magistrates Courts Act

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Magistrates Courts Act."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Magistrates Courts Act 1921 (Qld.)
* Court of Petty Sessions Ordinance (No 2) 1930 (Cwlth.), which was eventually renamed as the Magistrates Court Act 1930 (ACT)
* Magistrates’ Courts Act 1944 (No. 32 of 1944) (South Africa)
* Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 (c. 43) (United Kingdom)
* Magistrates’ Courts Act 1989 (Vic.)
* Magistrates Court Act 2004 (WA)
# MacDonough's Song

First published in A Diversity of Creatures (1917), where it accompanies the story As Easy as A.B.C.
Whether the State can loose and bind  In Heaven as well as on Earth: If it be wiser to kill mankind  Before or after the birth— These are matters of high concern  Where State-kept schoolmen are; But Holy State (we have lived to learn)  Endeth in Holy War. Whether The People be led by The Lord,  Or lured by the loudest throat: If it be quicker to die by the sword  Or cheaper to die by vote— These are things we have dealt with once,  (And they will not rise from their grave) For Holy People, however it runs,  Endeth in wholly Slave.
Whatsoever, for any cause,  Seeketh to take or give, Power above or beyond the Laws,  Suffer it not to live! Holy State or Holy King—  Or Holy People’s Will— Have no truck with the senseless thing.  Order the guns and kill!  Saying—after—me:—
Once there was The People—Terror gave it birth; Once there was The People and it made a Hell of Earth. Earth arose and crushed it. Listen, O ye slain! Once there was The People—it shall never be again!
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1936, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 87 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mabee v. White Plains Pub Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
327 U.S. 178
Mabee v. White Plains Pub Company
Argued: Dec. 5, 1945. --- Decided: Feb 11, 1946
[Syllabus from pages 178-180 intentionally omitted]
Mr. David H. Moses, of Suffern, N.Y., for petitioners.
Mr. Jeter S. Ray, of Nashville, Tenn., for Administrator of the Wage & Hour Division, Department of Labor, as amicus curiae, by special leave of Court.
Mr. Elisha Hanson, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# MacGregor's Gathering

The moon's on the lake, and the mist's on the brae, And the Clan has a name that is nameless by day; Then gather, gather, gather, Grigalach! Gather, gather, gather, &c.
Our signal for fight, that from monarchs we drew, Must be heard but by night in our vengeful haloo! Then haloo, Grigalach! haloo, Grigalach! Haloo, haloo, haloo, Grigalach, &c.
Glen Orchy's proud mountains, Coalchuirn and her towers, Glenstrae and Glenlyon no longer are ours; We're landless, landless, landless, Grigalach! Landless, landless, landless, &c.
But doom'd and devoted by vassal and lord,
MacGregor has still both his heart and his sword! Then courage, courage, courage, Grigalach! Courage, courage, courage, &c.
If they rob us of name, and pursue us with beagles,
Give their roofs to the flame, and their flesh to the eagles! Then vengeance, vengeance, vengeance, Grigalach! Vengeance, vengeance, vengeance, &c.
While there's leaves in the vorest, and foam on the river, MacGregor, despite them, shall flourish for ever! Come then, Grigalach, come then, Grigalach, Come then, come then, come then, &c.
Through the depths of Loch Katrine the steed shall career, O'er the peak of Ben-Lomond the galley shall steer, And the rocks of Crag-Royston like icicles melt, Ere our wrongs be forgot, or the vengeance unfelt! Then gather, gather, gather Grigalach! Gather, gather, gather, &c.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McHenry v. La Soci et E. Francaise D'Epargnes.

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
95 U.S. 58
McHenry v. La Soci et E. Francaise D'Epargnes.
ERROR to the Supreme Court of the State of California.
On the 18th of June, 1870, John McHenry, being indebted to a society known as La Soci et e Francaise D' Epargnes in the sum of $14,000, made his promissory note for that amount, payable twelve months after date, and secured its payment by a mortgage on certain property in the city of San Francisco, in the execution of which his wife did not join. McHenry was, March 20, 1872, duly adjudicated a bankrupt in the District Court of the United States for the District of California, and on the 14th of June following the society proved its debt before the register. Aug. 15, 1872, proceedings in foreclosure were commenced by the society in the District Court of the nineteenth judicial district of the State of California against the assignee in bankruptcy, McHenry, his wife and other parties claiming interests in the property. The assignee made no defence. McHenry and wife demurred, and, among other grounds, set up the bankruptcy proceedings and the absence of leave of the bankrupt court to commence the suit. Oct. 4, 1872, application was made to the latter court for such leave; and, the assignee having so consented in open court, the order was granted, provided that in said action no judgment for any deficiency be taken against the bankrupt or his assignee. The cause was then, notwithstanding certain special defences of the wife, prosecuted to a decree, which made no provision for enfor ing the payment of any sum that might remain due after the sale of the mortgaged premises. McHenry and wife appealed to the Supreme Court of the State, where the decree below was affirmed. The case was then brought here.
Mr. Thomas J. Durant for the plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Edmond L. Goold, contra.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McGuire v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
273 U.S. 95
McGuire v. United States
Argued: and Submitted Nov. 24, 1926. --- Decided: Jan 3, 1927
Mr. Ransom H. Gillett, of Albany, N. Y., for McGuire.
The Attorney General and Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mazurek Dąbrowskiego

* related portals: National anthems.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons gallery, Commons category, quotes, Wikidata item.
Mazurek Dąbrowskiego is Poland's National Anthem. It was written in 1797 by Józef Wybicki and adopted in 1926.Warning: template has been deprecated. See also Hey, Slavs.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
Poland is not yet lost while we still live what the foreign powers had taken from us with swords we'll take back.
Refrain: March, march Dabrowski from Italy to Poland Under your command we will reunite with the nation.
We will cross the Vistula and Warta Rivers, we will be Poles, Bonaparte showed us how to win.
Refrain: March, march...
Like Czarniecki to Poznan, after Swedish annexation, We will come back across the sea to save our motherlanl
Refrain: March, march...
Father, in tears, says to his Basia: "Just listen, It seems that our people are beating the drums."
Refrain: March, march...
# Mazeppa

* Mazeppa, a Poem (1819)
* Mazeppa in The Works of Lord Byron (ed. Coleridge, Prothero) Poetry, Volume 4 (1905): (transcription project)
# Mazer v. Stein

United States Supreme Court
347 U.S. 201
Mazer v. Stein
Argued: Dec. 3, 1953. ---
See 347 U.S. 949, 74 S.Ct. 637.
Messrs. Max R. Kraus and Robert L. Kahn, Chicago, Ill., for petitioners.
Mr. George E. Frost, Chicago, Ill. (Messrs. William Freeman, Chicago, Ill. and Charles F. Barber, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondents.
Mr. Benjamin Forman, New York City, for the Register of Copyrights. Amicus curiae by special leave of Court.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mazeppa, a Poem

MAZEPPA.
LONDON:
PRINTED BY THOMAS DAVISON, WHITEFRIARS.
MAZEPPA,
A POEM.
BY LORD BYRON.
LONDON:
JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE-STREET.
1819.
* Mazeppa
* Ode
* A Fragment
MAZEPPA.
ADVERTISEMENT.
“CELUI qui remplissait alors cette place, était un gentilhomme Polonais, nommé Mazeppa, né dans le palatinat de Padolie; il avait été élevé page de Jean Casimir, et avait pris à sa cour quelque teinture des belles-lettres. Une intrigue qu’il eut dans sa jeunesse avec la femme d’un gentilhomme Polonais, ayant été découverte, le mari le fit lier tout nu sur un cheval farouche, et le laissa aller en cet état. Le cheval, qui était du pays de l’Ukraine, y retourna, et y porta Mazeppa, demi-mort de fatigue et de faim. Quelque paysans le secoururent: il resta long-tems parmi eux, et se signala dans plusieurs courses contre les Tartares. La supériorité de ses lumières lui donna une grande considération parmi les Cosaques: sa réputation s’augmentant de jour en jour, obligea le Czar à le faire Prince de l’Ukraine.”—Voltaire, Histoire de Charles XII. p. 196.
“Le roi fuyant et poursuivi eut son cheval tué sous lui; le Colonel Gieta, blessé, et perdant tout sa sang, lui donna le sien. Ainsi on remit deux fois à cheval, dans la suite, ce conquérant qui n’avait puy monter pendant la bataille.” Voltaire, Hist. de Charles XII. p. 216.
“Le roi alla par un autre chemin avec quelques cavaliers. Le carrosse, où il était, rompit dans la marche; on le remit à cheval. Pour comble de disgrace, il s’égara pendant la nuit dans un bois; là, son courage ne pouvant plus suppléer à ses forces épuisées, les douleurs de sa blessure devenues plus insupportable par la fatigue, son cheval étant tombé de lassitude, il se coucha quelques heures au pied d’un arbre, en danger d’être surpris à tout moment par les vainqueurs qui le cherchaient de tout côtés.”—Voltaire, Histoire de Charles XII. p. 218.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Markham v. Cabell

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
326 U.S. 404
Markham v. Cabell
Argued: Oct. 19, 1945. --- Decided: Dec 10, 1945
The Trading with the Enemy Act automatically went into effect again at outbreak of Second World War. Trading with the Enemy Act § 2, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 2; § 5(b), as amended by First War Powers Act 1941, § 301, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 616 and § 302, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 617; § 9(a, e) amended in 1920 and 1928, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 9(a, e).
Subdivision (e) of section 9 of Trading with the Enemy Act, providing that no debt shall be paid by Alien Property Custodian unless it was owned by claimant before October 6, 1917, nor unless notice thereof was filed before enactment of settlement of War Claims Act of 1928, was limited to seizures made during First World War and does not apply to seizures made in Second World War. Trading with the Enemy Act § 9(a, e), amended in 1920 and 1928, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 9(a, e).
Mr. Paul A. Freund, of Washington, D.C., for petitioners.
Mr. Hartwell Cabell, pro se.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Markham v. Allen

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
326 U.S. 490
Markham v. Allen
Argued: and Submitted Dec. 5, 1945. --- Decided: Jan 7, 1946
Mr. M. S. Isenbergh, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Joseph Wahrhaftig, of San Francisco, Cal., for respondents.
Mr. Chief Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Markey Demands ATF Plan for Printed Plastic Guns

Source: markey.house.gov. May 8, 2013.
Markey Demands ATF Plan for Printed Plastic Guns
HON. EDWARD JOHN MARKEY
OF MASSACHUSETTS MEMBER, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
May 8, 2013
Markey Demands ATF Plan for Printed Plastic Guns
May 8, 2013
New technology allows 3D printing of guns capable of evading metal detectors; Gun safety advocates join Cong. Markey in raising questions
WASHINGTON (May 8, 2013) – Following the creation and successful testing of a plastic gun created with a 3D printer, Congressman Ed Markey (D-Mass.) asked the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives how the agency intends to deal with the emerging technology and the threat it poses to public safety. A Texas gun maker used a 3D printer to manufacture the plastic firearm, whose only metal components were a nail firing pin and a metal shank necessary to ensure compliance with federal law. The blueprints for this new weapon are publically available on the Internet.
In his letter to ATF, which is available HERE, Cong. Markey raises concerns that individuals could use the blueprints made available by the company Defense Distributed to manufacture guns in their home that will not adhere to current regulations for firearms. By omitting elements like a metal shank, these weapons could pass undetected through metal detectors and x-ray machines at airports, secure buildings, and schools.
“We just saw with the Boston bombings how homemade devices can wreak incredible havoc. These homemade, stealth firearms could pose new threats to law enforcement, American citizens, and children across our country,” said Cong. Markey. “ATF needs to take a hard look at this emerging technology, and whether distributing the schematics to print these firearms is a blueprint for another tragedy.”
Cong. Markey’s concerns were echoed today by leading gun safety advocates.
“It’s critical that law enforcement anticipate the rapid changes in firearm technology and plan ahead in order to protect public safety. Other than terrorists and criminals, it serves no one’s interest to allow unrestricted access to this undetectable plastic gun technology without regulation,” said John Rosenthal, the founder of Stop Handgun Violence and a gun owner himself.
"We can't allow technology to outpace public safety. We need to ensure that federal agencies charged with enforcing our nation's gun laws are prepared for new technology that could put guns in the hands of criminals and terrorists. Representative Markey is to be commended for leading on this emerging issue,” said Kristen Rand, Legislative Director for the Violence Policy Center. ____________________
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McDaniel v. Traylor (212 U.S. 428)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
212 U.S. 428
McDaniel v. Traylor (212 U.S. 428)
Argued: January 12, 1909. --- Decided: February 23, 1909
Messrs. G. B. Webster and J. R. Beasley for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from page 429 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. N. W. Norton and R. W. Nicholls for appellees.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McDermott, Inc. v. Lewis

* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
Supreme Court of Delaware
531 A.2d 206
McDermott Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. Harry Lewis and Nina Altman, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees
No. 261 Argued: December 9, 1986 --- Decided: September 16, 1987
Charles F. Richards, Jr., Esquire, of Richards, Layton & Finger; Wilmington, Richard F. Nolan, Esquire (argued), and Dennis E. Glazer, Esquire, of Davis Polk & Wardwell, New York, of Counsel, for Appellant.
Norman M. Monhait, Esquire, of Morris & Rosenthal; Wilmington, Mordecai Rosenfeld, Esquire (argued), of Mordecai Rosenfeld, P.C., New York, and A. Arnold Gershon, Esquire, of A. Arnold Gershon, P.C., New York, Of Counsel, for Appellees.
Christie, Chief Justice, Horsey and Moore, Justices.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McDaniel v. Traylor

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "McDaniel v. Traylor."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* McDaniel v. Traylor (196 U.S. 415)
* McDaniel v. Traylor (212 U.S. 428)
# McDaniel v. The Lisholt

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
359 U.S. 26
McDaniel v. The Lisholt
Mr. C. Dickerman Williams, for petitioner.
Messrs. James M. Estabrook and Francis X. Byrn, for respondent A/S Lise.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McDaniel v. The Lisholt/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
359 U.S. 26
McDaniel v. The Lisholt
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated. The case is remanded to the District Court for a new trial in light of Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 358 U.S. 625, 79 S.Ct. 406.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Larnach, James Walker

​Larnach, James Walker, M.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1875, a member of the South-eastern circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 30 Dec., 1871 (then aged 22), called to the bar 28 June, 1876 (2nd son of Donald Larnach, of Brambletye, Sussex, banker); born , 1849.
    Brambletye, East Grinstead; 21, Kensington Palace Gardens, W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Lascelles, Arthur Rowley William

​Lascelles, Arthur Rowley William, a student of the Inner Temple 4 June, 1866 (then aged 36), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1868 (2nd son of Francis Lascelles, Esq., of Hampstead, Middlesex); born , 1830.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Lascelles, Rowley

​Lascelles, Rowley, J.P. Cardiganshire, a member of the South Wales circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 26 March, 1828, called to the bar 7 June, 1833 (3rd son of Francis Lascelles, Esq., of Plymouth); born , 1807; married , 1835, Mary Albinia, dau. of late Thomas Hastings, Esq., 4th light dragoons, and has issue.
    Pencraig, Boncath, R.S.O., Cardiganshire.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Lankester, Edward Forbes

​Lankester, Edward Forbes, B.A., (scholar) Lincoln Coll., Oxon (1st class lit. hum.), 1877, goes the Northern circuit, a student of the Middle Temple 12 Jan., 1874, called to the bar 3 July, 1878 (3rd son of Edwin Lankester, of London, M.D., coroner); born 31 Jan., 1855.
    3, Garden Court, or 4, Crown Office Row, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Lascelles, John (b.1841)

​Lascelles, Rev. John, M.A., Clare Coll., Camb., 1877 (B.A. 1863), vicar of Sheriff Hutton, Yorks, since 1880, curate of Slingsby 1879–80, author of Local Government and Sanitary Law Reform, a student of the Middle Temple 20 Nov., 1862, called to the bar 30 April, 1866 (only son of Robert Morley Lascelles, of Slingsby, Yorks, surgeon); born 13 May, 1841.
    Sheriff Hutton Vicarage, Yorks.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Larcom, Arthur

​Larcom, Arthur, M.A. Oriel Coll., Oxon, Oriental secretary Teheran 1879, entered Foreign Office 1871, a student of the Inner Temple 23 Nov., 1868 (then aged 21), called to the bar 30 April, 1875 (4th son of Major-Genl. Sir Thomas Larcom, Bart., K.C.B.); born 10 Nov., 1847; married 30 July, 1884, Sophie, youngest dau. of late Alexander Perceval, Esq., of Temple House, co. Sligo (see Foster's Baronetage).
    Upton House, Nursling, Southampton; Teheran, Persia.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Lascelles, George Edwin

​Lascelles, Hon. George Edwin, registrar of Yorkshire West Riding, J.P. North and West Riding, capt. Yorkshire yeomanry hussars 1859–69, educated at Merton Coll., Oxon, a student of the Inner Temple 16 April, 1849 (then aged 22), called to the bar 30 April, 1852 (3rd son of Henry, 3rd earl of Harewood); born 19 Oct., 1826; married 21 July, 1851, Lady Louisa Nina Murray, dau. of William David, 4th earl of Mansfield, and has issue (see Foster's Peerage).
    Sion Hill, Thirsk; Junior Carlton Club, S.W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Lascelles, Percy Pellew

​Lascelles, Percy Pellew, a member of the South Wales circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 16 Nov., 1872 (then aged 24), called to the bar 3 July, 1878 (4th son of Rowley Lascelles, Esq., of Pencraig, co. Cardigan, bar.-at-law); born , 1848; married 5 Sept., 1878, Lilias Frances Anne, 5th dau. of Henry Woodcock, Esq., of Bank House, Wigan, and of Bolnore, Sussex.
    Care of Bolnore, Hayward's Heath.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Lascelles, Francis Henry

​Lascelles, Francis Henry, F.S.A., LL.B., Trin. Hall, Camb., 1854, author of Horse Warranty and of Law of Juvenile Offenders, J.P. Surrey, a member of the South-eastern circuit, practised before the High Court at Madras and Calcutta, secretary to Earl Marshal, Duke of Norfolk, 1870–2, a student of the Inner Temple 14 April, 1862 (then aged 37), certificate of honour 1st class Trin., 1864, called to the bar 6 June, 1864 (eldest son of Francis Lascelles, Esq., late of Glandolfan, co. Pembroke, dec.); born 16 Jan., 1825; married 30 May, 1850, Mary, dau. of Samuel Nevile Ward, Esq., of Baston Hyes, Kent (see Foster's Peerage, V. Molesworth).
    Noyaddwilim, Cardigan; Reform, New University, and St. George's Clubs.