OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# National Lyrics, and Songs for Music/A Farewell to Wales

A FAREWELL TO WALES.
FOR THE MELODY CALLED "THE ASH GROVE."
ON LEAVING THAT COUNTRY WITH MY CHILDREN.
The sound of thy streams in my spirit I bear—  —Farewell! and a blessing be with thee, green land! On thy hearths, on thy halls, on thy pure mountain-air,  On the chords of the harp, and the minstrel's free hand!  From the love of my soul with my tears it is shed,  As I leave thee, green land of my home and my dead!
I bless thee!—yet not for the beauty which dwells  In the heart of thy hills, on the rocks of thy shore; And not for the memory set deep in thy dells,  Of the bard and the hero, the mighty of yore;  And not for thy songs of those proud ages fled,  —Green land, Poet-land of my home and my dead!
I bless thee for all the true bosoms that beat,  Where'er a low hamlet smiles up to thy skies, For thy cottage hearths, burning the stranger to greet,  For the soul that shines forth from thy children’s kind eyes!  May the blessing, like sunshine, about thee be spread,  Green land of my childhood, my home, and my dead!
# Morey v. Lockhart

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
123 U.S. 56
Morey v. Lockhart
Wm. A. Maury, for the motion.
J. D. Rouse and Wm. Grant, in opposition.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Morewood v. Enequist Owner of the Brig Gothland

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
64 U.S. 491
Morewood v. Enequist Owner of the Brig Gothland
THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the southern district of New York.
It was a case in admiralty, arising under the following circumstances:
The brig Gothland, owned by Enequist, was chartered by Burt, Myrtle, & Co., of Batavia, to proceed to Padung, on the island of Sumatra, there to receive a quantity of coffee; to return thence to Batavia and complete her cargo, and deliver the same in New York, freight to be paid by the assignees of the bills of lading on delivery of the cargo.
It was admitted that the bills of lading were assigned for value to the appellants, composing the firm of G. B. Morewood & Company.
Enequist first filed a libel in rem against the cargo for the amount of the freight; but after some proceedings which it is not necessary to mention, this action was discontinued, and a libel in personam filed, which is the present case. The respondents alleged that, owing to the neglect of the carrier, the coffee, black pepper, and cassia, were damaged to the amount of $4,720.60, which they claimed as a deduction from the freight. The whole freight claimed was $9,160.56, with interest from April, 1853.
The District Court referred the case to a commissioner, who reported that the freight due in September, 1857, was $11,372.56, for which amount a decree was rendered, with costs.
The case, being carried to the Circuit Court, was there tried on the appeal from the District Court and on additional evidence taken by the respondents. The decree of the District Court was affirmed with costs, and the respondents appealed to this court.
It was submitted on printed arguments by Mr. Dodge and Mr. Johnson for the appellants, and by Mr. Donohue for the appellee.
The counsel for the appellants considered that the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States over an action on contract by a libel in personam in admiralty upon a contract of affreightment was still an open question, and therefore proceeded to argue it. The elaborate arguments against the jurisdiction filed by them, and for it by Mr. Donohue, are omitted by the reporter, in deference to the opinion of the court.
Mr. Justice GRIER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Morey v. Doud

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
354 U.S. 457
Morey v. Doud
Argued: April 24, 1957. --- Decided: June 24, 1957
Mr. William C. Wines, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Illinois, Chicago, Ill., for appellants.
Mr. G. Kent Yowell and John J. Yowell, Chicago, Ill., for appellees.
Mr. Justice BURTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Morella

* Morella, published in The Southern Literary Messenger, April 1835.
* Morella, published in Burton's Gentleman's Magazine, November 1839.
* Morella, published in Tales of the Grotesque and Arabesque, 1840.
* Morella, published in The Works of the Late Edgar Allan Poe, 1850.
* "Morella", in Poe's Tales of Mystery and Imagination (1935)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mobile Ohio Railroad Company v. Greenwald & Champenois

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
235 U.S. 717
Mobile Ohio Railroad Company v. Greenwald & Champenois

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mobile Ohio Railroad Company v. Greenwald & Champenois/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
235 U.S. 717
Mobile Ohio Railroad Company v. Greenwald & Champenois
Messrs. L. E. Jeffiries and S. R. Prince for plaintiff in error.
No appearance for defendant in error.
Dismissed pursuant to the Twenty-eighth Rule.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mobile Railway Company v. Jurey

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
111 U.S. 584
Mobile Railway Company v. Jurey
[Syllabus from pages 584-585 intentionally omitted]
[Statement of Case from page 585 intentionally omitted]
David Clopton and Thos. G. Jones, for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel on pages 585-586 intentionally omitted]
D. S. Troy, H. C. Tompkins, and Henry C. Semple, for defendants in error.
Mr. JUSTICE WOODS delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mobley v. New York Life Insurance Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
295 U.S. 632
Mobley v. New York Life Insurance Company
Argued: May 6, 1935. --- Decided: May 27, 1935
Mr. Sidney C. Mize, of Gulfport, Miss., for petitioner.
Mr. Wm. H. Watkins, of Jackson, Miss., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mobile Company v. Tennessee

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Fuller
United States Supreme Court
153 U.S. 486
Mobile Company v. Tennessee
E. L. Russell, E. J. Phelps, and F. W. Whitridge, for plaintiffs in error.
Geo. W. Pickle, Atty. Gen., S. A. Champion, Jas. M. Head, M. M. Neil, and J. M. Trout, for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Narrative of a survey of the intertropical and western coasts of Australia
## Volumes

* Volume 1 (transcription project)
* Volume 2 (transcription project)
# Narrative of a voyage to the northwest coast of America in the years 1811, 1812, 1813, and 1814

Transcription Project
# New Orleans v. Gaines/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
82 U.S. 624
New Orleans v. Gaines

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# New Orleans v. Houston

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
119 U.S. 265
New Orleans v. Houston
W. H. Rogers and J. Ward Gurl y, Jr., for appellants, City of New Orleans and others.
J. A. Campbell, for appellees, Houston, State Tax Collector, and another.
MATTHEWS, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# New Orleans v. Morris

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
105 U.S. 600
New Orleans v. Morris
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. E. Howard McCaleb for the appellant.
Mr. William Wirt Howe and Mr. John A. Campbell for the appellees.
MR. JUSTICE MILLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# New Orleans v. Louisiana Const Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
129 U.S. 45
New Orleans v. Louisiana Const Company
H. C. Miller and William A. Maury, for plaintiff in error.
E. Howard McCaleb, for defendant in error.
FULLER, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Molly Make-Believe

Carl Stanton is an invalid suffering from an unusual bout of rheumatism. His fiancée is gone for the winter and though he begs her to write to help ease his boredom and pain she is stingy with her letters. She sends him what she calls a "ridiculous circular" which she states is very apropos of his sentimental passion for letters. In a sudden fit of mischief, malice and rheumatism, Carl decides to respond to the circular which results in bringing about the necessary distraction in a flurry of letters that do ease Carl’s boredom and pain but also bring him something else that he never quite expected.

## Contents

I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI.
# Molly O'Rigge

Dated from internal and external evidence.
MOLLY O’RIGGE.
Sit ye awhile and tipple a bit.
The Delights of Wine.
Caledonia! Native Land!
The Warrior Bard.
Beadle of the Parish.
Glasgow—Printed for the Booksellers.
* Molly O'Rigge
* Sit ye awhile and tipple a bit
* The delights of wine
* Caledonia! Native land!
* The warrior bard
* Beadle of the parish
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Molly Malone

* information about this edition.
* related portals: National anthems.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
Molly Malone, or Cockles and Mussels, is the unofficial anthem of Dublin City in Ireland. It is sung by supporters of Dublin GAA teams and Irish international rugby team. The song tells the tale of a beautiful fishmonger who plies her trade on the streets of Dublin, but who tragically dies young of a fever.Warning: template has been deprecated.
In Dublin's fair city Where girls are so pretty, I first set my eyes on sweet Molly Malone, As she wheeled her wheelbarrow Through streets broad and narrow, Crying "Cockles and mussels! Alive, Alive Oh!"
(Chorus) "Alive, alive Oh! Alive, alive Oh!" Crying, "Cockles and mussels! Alive, Alive Oh!"
She was a fishmonger But sure 'twas no wonder For so were her father and mother before And they each wheeled their barrow Through streets broad and narrow Crying "Cockles and mussels! Alive, Alive Oh!"
She died of a fever, And no one could save her, And that was the end of sweet Molly Malone, But her ghost wheels her barrow Through streets broad and narrow, Crying "Cockles and mussels! Alive, alive Oh!"
This work was published before January 1, 1929 and is anonymous or pseudonymous due to unknown authorship. It is in the public domain in the United States as well as countries and areas where the copyright terms of anonymous or pseudonymous works are 95 years or less since publication.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Nassau Smelting Refining Works v. Brightwood Bronze Foundry Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 269
Nassau Smelting Refining Works v. Brightwood Bronze Foundry Company
Argued: April 28, 1924. --- Decided: , May 26, 1924
Mr. Joseph B. Jacobs, and Jacobs & Jacobs, all of Boston, Mass., for petitioner.
Mr. Harry M. Ehrlich, of Springfield, Mass., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Nashville Union and American editorial on the Harper's Ferry

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
published 21 October 1859
We publish to-day full telegraphic particulars of the riot at Harper's Ferry, a briefer outline of which had heretofore appeared in our columns. The first report attributed the riot to the fact that a contractor on the Government works had absconded, leaving his employees unpaid, who had seized the arsenal with the purpose of securing Government funds and paying themselves. Later accounts seem conclusive that it was a concerted attempt at insurrection, aided by leading Northern Abolitionists. The papers of Brown, the leader, are said to have fallen into the hands of Gov. Wise, and to include among them letters from Gerrit Smith, Fred Douglass and others. We shall hear more in a few days, when, no doubt, the whole plot will be disclosed.
In the mean time, the facts already before us show that Abolitionism is working out its legitimate results, in encouraging fanatics to riot and revolution. The "harmless republicanism" out of which there is serious talk even here of making a national party, to defeat the Democracy, fosters and sustains, and is formidable only from the zeal of, the class within its ranks who incited this insurrection. Of the capacity of the South to defend and protect herself, we have no doubt. But when called on to do this, as at Harper's Ferry, she must know who are her friends and who are her enemies. She can have no political association with men who are only watching a safe opportunity to cut the throats of her citizens. It will not do for Northern Republicans to attribute this outbreak to the fanaticism of a few zealots. The Republican party of the North is responsible for it. It is the legitimate result of Sewardism. It is the commencement of what Seward spoke of as the "irrepressible conflict." The South will hold the whole party of Republicans responsible for the blood-shed at Harper's Ferry. For the fanatics engaged there would never have dared the attempt at insurrection but for the inflammatory speeches and writings of Seward, Greeley, and the other Republican leaders. Waiting for the details before saying more, we refer the reader to the accounts of the insurrection published in another place in this paper.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Natal v. State of Louisiana

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
123 U.S. 516
Natal v. State of Louisiana
J. Hale Sypher and West Steever, for the motion.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Natal v. Louisiana

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
139 U.S. 621
Natal v. Louisiana
J. Hale Sypher and West Steever, for plaintiffs in error.
Carleton Hunt, for the State.
GRAY, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Natchez Courier editorial on the Dred Scott case

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
published 14 March 1857
We have already published the fact that the U. S. Supreme Court had decided this much talked of case, involving the Missouri Compromise question, and pronouncing the latter unconstitutional. We find in the St. Louis Intelligencer of the 7th inst., a telegraphic synopsis of the decision, which our readers will deem interesting.
It will be seen that the Court have also decided that Congress cannot confer on a territorial legislature, power to make enactments relative to the personal property of citizens of the United States in federal territory. This is a seeming blow at the doctrine of squatter sovereignty, but not quite as hard a one as we could wish the Court had given. As Congress has no power to exclude slavery from the territory and confer freedom upon negroes, it cannot confer that power on territorial agents. The stream can rise no higher than the fountain, as a matter of course. But Gen. Cass contends that the territories have this power, not so much by donation from Congress, as by some inherent sovereignty of their own. And this inherent squatter-sovereignty, (not derivative jurisdiction,) the Court did not pass upon. The question probably did not come before the Court. The opinion, however, as to Congressional power, is full of interest and point.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Nassau Smelting Refining Works v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
266 U.S. 101
Nassau Smelting Refining Works v. United States
Argued: and Submitted Oct. 7, 1924. --- Decided: Nov 17, 1924
Mr. A. S. Gilbert, of New York City, for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 102-103 intentionally omitted]
The Attorney General and Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, of New York City, for the United States.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# New York v. United States (396 U.S. 281)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 281
New York v. United States (396 U.S. 281)
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# New York v. United States (396 U.S. 281)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 281
New York v. United States (396 U.S. 281)
CITY OF SHERIDAN et al.
v.
UNITED STATES et al.
No. 520. Supreme Court of the United States
January 12, 1970
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Dunton F. Tynan, Asst. Sol. Gen., and Walter J. Myskowski, for appellant State of New York.
Gordon P. MacDougall, William G. Mahoney, and C. C. Sheldon, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Nebraska, for appellants City of Sheridan and others.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, and Jerome Nelson, for the United States and others in No. 100.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, and Fritz R. Kahn, for the United States and others in No. 520.
Wallace R. Steffen, for appellee Erie Lackawanna Ry. Co.
George G. Coughlin, for appellee Broome County Chamber of Commerce.
Howard J. Trienens and Richard T. Cubbage, for appellee Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# New Zealand

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "New Zealand."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "New Zealand," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "New Zealand," in The New Student's Reference Work, Chicago: F.E. Compton and Co. (1914)
* "New Zealand," in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
* "New Zealand," in Collier's New Encyclopedia, New York: P. F. Collier & Son Co. (1921)
* "New Zealand," in CIA World Fact Book, (ed.) by CIA (2004)

## See also

* Portal:New Zealand
# New poems and variant readings/Still I love to rhyme

STILL I LOVE TO RHYME
Still I love to rhyme, and still more, rhyming, to wander Far from the commoner way; Old-time trills and falls by the brook-side still do I ponder, Dreaming to-morrow to-day.
Come here, come, revive me, Sun-God, teach me, Apollo, Measures descanted before; Since I ancient verses, I emulous follow, Prints in the marbles of yore.
Still strange, strange, they sound in old young raiment invested, Songs for the brain to forget— Young song-birds elate to grave old temples benested Piping and chirruping yet.
​Thoughts? No thought has yet unskilled attempted to flutter Trammelled so vilely in verse; He who writes but aims at fame and his bread and his butter, Won with a groan and a curse.
# New poems and variant readings/Swallows travel to and fro

SWALLOWS TRAVEL TO AND FRO
Swallows travel to and fro, And the great winds come and go, And the steady breezes blow, Bearing perfume, bearing love. Breezes hasten, swallows fly, Towered clouds forever ply, And at noonday, you and I See the same sunshine above.
Dew and rain fall everywhere, Harvests ripen, flowers are fair, And the whole round earth is bare To the moonshine and the sun; ​And the live air, fanned with wings, Bright with breeze and sunshine, brings Into contact distant things, And makes all the countries one.
Let us wander where we will, Something kindred greets us still; Something seen on vale or hill Falls familiar on the heart; So, at scent or sound or sight, Severed souls by day and night Tremble with the same delight— Tremble, half the world apart.