OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Latter Day Saints' Messenger and Advocate/Volume 2/Number 9/Letter to Oliver Cowdery from Sidney Rigdon (June 1836)

Br. O. COWDERY:
Sir—I have just received the desperate information, that Simons Rider, in consequence of the notice which I have taken of him, is going to prosecute me; and I greatly desire, through the medium of your paper, to plead with him for quarters. For O! I do not want to be sued for the terrible crime of telling the truth about a man.
I know that the truth is a tight fit upon Simons, and I think it is likely that it hurts him some too; as no chastisement for the present is joyous but grievo[u]s, nevertheless afterward it yields the peaceable fruits of righteousness to them who are exercised therewith. And could Simons avoid sueing me, for a little season, perhaps it might have that effect upon him. O Simons! do not sue me if you can any way avoid it!
But if Simons cannot in his patience possess his soul, I think I can put him on a better scheme to ally his feelings, and I think gratify them perhaps more.
I have an old uncle in the state of Maryland, that was never married, and page 335he possesses a large property. I would say to him, get his brother Adamson Bentley (for he is an animal of his own kidney) and go there; he is now about eighty years of age, & of course it is will-making time, and about the right age for Bentley to prevail on him to make a will that will disinherit a monstrous heretic. I think it is probable there will be no difficulty in engaging Bentley in his service; seeing he has been so successful in his former attempt with old Mr. Brooks, my wife's father, and got his own wife so—well fattened on other people's property.—He can, no doubt, be engaged again for the same service. Be sure my uncle is not a Campbellite in religion, but a regular Baptist; but that will not make any difference; for Bentley can become all things to all men, that he may gain some.
This course I think may satisfy Simons until his chastisement works out the peaceable fruits of righteousness, and I will escape being sued; and if my family should lose a few thousand dollars, if Bentley's wife only gets it, it is as well; it is all in the family.
Simons would do well also to say to his brother Darwin Atwater, as he has a great deal of labor to carry about and read Howe's book, that he can be favored with the history of old Clapp, his wife's father, to carry with him; so that he can shew the people Campbellism unveiled also.
Yours in great haste, and you may well think, not without some anxiety too.
SIDNEY RIGDON.
# Latter Day Saints' Messenger and Advocate/Volume 3

| Number | Date | Pages |
| Number 1 | Oct. 1836 | 385-400 |
| Number 2 | Nov. 1836 | 401-416 |
| Number 3 | Dec. 1836 | 417-432 |
| Number 4 | Jan. 1837 | 433-448 |
| Number 5 | Feb. 1837 | 449-464 |
| Number 6 | Mar. 1837 | 465-480 |
| Number 7 | Apr. 1837 | 481-496 |
| Number 8 | May 1837 | 497-512 |
| Number 9 | Jun. 1837 | 513-528 |
| Number 10 | Jul. 1837 | 529-544 |
| Number 11 | Aug. 1837 | 545-560 |
| Number 12 | Sep. 1837 | 561-576 |
# Latter Day Saints' Messenger and Advocate/Volume 3/Number 1

Source document in Mormon Publications: 19th and 20th Centuries online archive: Messenger and Advocate Vol. 3 Note: Some headings and bracketed texts are editorial and not part of the original text.
LATTER DAY SAINTS' :
| MESSENGER AND ADVOCATE |||
| Volume III. No. 1.] | KIRTLAND, OHIO, OCTOBER, 1836. | [Whole No. 25. |
* Prospectus
* Letter from Oliver Cowdery (Oct. 1836)
* Died

## Messenger and Advocate

* Editorials
* JUDGE AFTER HEARING.
* Letter to Oliver Cowdery from Orson Pratt (Sep. 5, 1836)
* Letter to Oliver Cowdery from J. Goodson (Sep. 1836)
* Conference minutes
* Letters from Elders
* Notices
* THE GATHERING. (Hymn)
* THE LATTER DAY SAINTS'
* Messenger and Advocate,
* is published by
* Oliver Cowdery,
* Editor and Proprietor,
* At $1, per an. in advance. Every person procuring ten new subscribers, and forwarding $10, current money, shall be entitled to a paper one year, gratis.
* All letter to the Editor, must be
* —> Post Paid. <—
* No subscription will be received for a less term than one year, and no paper discontinued till all arrearages are paid, except at the option of the publisher.
# Krug v. Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
329 U.S. 591
Krug v. Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Company
Argued: Jan. 6, 7, 1947. --- Decided: Feb 3, 1947
Mr
Frederick Bernays Wiener, of Providence, R.I., for petitioners.
Mr.Lawrence Cake, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kroger Grocery Baking Company v. Lutz

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
299 U.S. 300
Kroger Grocery Baking Company v. Lutz
Argued: Dec. 7, 1936. --- Decided: Dec 21, 1936
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Indiana.
Messrs. Robert S. Marx and Frank E. Wood, both of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Krueger v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
246 U.S. 69
Krueger v. United States
Argued: Dec. 20, 1917. --- Decided: March 4, 1918
[Syllabus from pages 69-70 intentionally omitted]
Mr. William V. Hodges, of Denver, Colo., for appellant.
[Argument of Council on pages 70-72 intentionally omitted.]
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Kearful, for the United States.
Mr. Justice DAY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ladies-in-Waiting

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Commons category, Wikidata item.
The enviably large following of Kate Douglas Wiggin will doubtless adore these five pretty, if not robust, stories of sentiment.—review in the Bookman, April 1920
LADIES-IN-WAITING
By
KATE DOUGLAS WIGGIN
WITH FRONTISPIECE BY
CHRISTINE TUCKE CURTISS
BOSTON AND NEW YORK HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY The Riverside Press Cambridge 1919
CONTENTS
* Miss Thomasina Tucker1
* The Turning-Point97
* Huldah the Prophetess149
* Two on a Tour189
* Philippa's Nervous Prostration275
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Krulewitch v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Jackson

## Dissenting Opinion

    Burton
United States Supreme Court
336 U.S. 440
Krulewitch v. United States
Argued: Jan. 10, 1949. --- Decided: March 28, 1949
Mr. Jocob W. Friedman, of New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Robert W. Ginnane, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Krupp

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Krupp."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Krupp, Alfred," in The New International Encyclopædia, New York: Dodd, Mead and Co. (1905)
* "Krupp, Friedrich," in The New International Encyclopædia, New York: Dodd, Mead and Co. (1905)
* "Krupp, Friedrich Alfred," in The New International Encyclopædia, New York: Dodd, Mead and Co. (1905)
* "Krupp Foundries, Social Work at," in The New International Encyclopædia, New York: Dodd, Mead and Co. (1905)
* "Krupp, Alfred," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* “The Symbolism of Krupp,” an essay by Gilbert Keith Chesterton in the collection Utopia of Usurers and Other Essays (1917)
# Krupa v. Farmington River Power Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
364 U.S. 506
Krupa v. Farmington River Power Company
Thaddeus Maliszewski, for appellants.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Krupa v. Farmington River Power Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
364 U.S. 506
Krupa v. Farmington River Power Company
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kryger v. Wilson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
242 U.S. 171
Kryger v. Wilson
Argued: November 13, 1916. --- Decided: December 4, 1916
Messrs. O. E. Holman and William W. Fry for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 172 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. George S. Grimes and Jesse Van Valkenburg for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Brandeis delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Le Morte d'Arthur/Volume II

Layout 2
EVERYMAN’S LIBRARY
EDITED BY ERNEST RHYS
ROMANCE
LE MORTE D’ARTHUR
BY SIR THOMAS MALORY · INTRODUCTION BY PROFESSOR RHYS
All rights reserved
Made in Great Britain at The Temple Tress Letchworth and decorated by Eric Ravilious
for J. M. Dent &L Sons Ltd.
Aldine House Bedford St. London First Published in this Edition 1906 Reprinted 1906, 1908, 1910, 1912, 1915 1917, 1923, 1926 1928, 1930, 1934
* Book X (ch. 20-88)
* Book XI
* Book XII
* Book XIII
* Book XIV
* Book XV
* Book XVI
* Book XVII
* Book XVIII
* Book XIX
* Book XX
* Book XXI
* Glossary
# Landon in The Improvisatrice; and Other Poems/Frontispiece

The choice of this image has been the subject of much speculation. The whole of the front of this volume was most carefully choreographed, so it will have been chosen with purpose.
* Drawn by T.M.WrightEngraved by Chas Heath
* THE IMPROVISATRICE.
* He heard her prayer with withering look;
* Then from unholy herbs he took
* A drug, and said it would recover
* The lost heart of her faithless lover.
* Published by Hurst, Robinson & Co. London, 1824
# Landon in The Improvisatrice; and Other Poems/Gazette 5

The following poems were published previously in The Literary Gazette. They can be accessed either from here or the full list of contents.
FRAGMENTS
| THE CRUSADER | 305 |
| THE WARRIOR, A SKETCH | 310 |
| APOLOGUE | 315 |
BALLADS
| THE SOLDIER'S GRAVE | 318 |
| SONG OF THE HUNTER'S BRIDE | 322 |
| WHEN SHOULD LOVER'S BREATHE THEIR VOWS? | 326 |
# Landon in The Improvisatrice; and Other Poems/Gazette 3

The following poem was published previously in The Literary Gazette. It can be accessed either from here or from the full list of contents.
FRAGMENTS.
| CRESCENTIUS | 291 |
# Landon in The Improvisatrice; and Other Poems/Gazette 4

The following poem was published previously in The Literary Gazette. It can be accessed either from here or from the full list of contents.
FRAGMENTS
| THE EMERALD RING, A SUPERSTITION | 300 |
# Landon in The Improvisatrice; and Other Poems/Gazette 1

THE BAYADERE.
AN INDIAN TALE.
["THE BAYADERE" was taken from some faint recollection of a tale I had either read or heard; and meeting with the word "Bayadere" many years after recalled it to my memory as a subject exquisitely poetical. I have been since told it was a poem of Goëthe's. This poem has never been to my knowledge translated; and, being ignorant of the German language, I am unable to say whether the tale conforms to the original or not.]
This poem together with the others listed below were published previously in The Literary Gazette (with the odd minor alteration). They can be accessed either from here or from the full list of contents.
TALES AND MISCELLANEOUS POEMS.
| THE BAYADERE | 155 |
| ST.GEORGE'S HOSPITAL | 179 |
| THE DESERTER | 185 |
| GLADESMUIR | 193 |
| THE MINSTREL OF PORTUGAL | 204 |
| THE BASQUE GIRL AND HENRI QUATRE | 212 |
| THE SAILOR | 219 |
| THE COVENANTERS | 227 |
FRAGMENTS.
| THE SOLDIER'S FUNERAL | 235 |
| LINES WRITTEN UNDER A PICTURE OF A GIRL BURNING A LOVE LETTER | 238 |
| ARION, A TALE | 240 |
| MANMADIN, THE INDIAN CUPID, FLOATING DOWN THE GANGES | 250 |
| THE FEMALE CONVICT | 256 |
| THE PAINTER'S LOVE | 261 |
| INEZ | 271 |
| THE OAK | 282 |
# Landon in The Improvisatrice; and Other Poems/Grey Cross

THE GREY CROSS.
A grey Cross stands beneath yon old beech tree; It marks a soldier's and a maiden's grave: Around it is a grove of orange-trees, With silver blossoms and with golden fruit. It was a Spaniard, whom he saved from death, Raised that Cross o'er the gallant Englishman.
 He left home a young soldier, full of hope And enterprise;—he fell in his first field! There came a lovely pilgrim to his tomb, The blue-eyed girl, his own betrothed bride,—
Pale, delicate,—one looking as the gale That bowed the rose could sweep her from the earth. Yet she had left her home, where every look Had been watched, oh, so tenderly!—and miles, Long weary miles, had wandered. When she came To the dim shadow of the aged beech, She was worn to a shadow; colourless The cheek once dyed by her own mountain-rose. She reached the grave, and died upon the sod! They laid her by her lover:—and her tale Is often on the songs that the guitar Echoes in the lime valleys of Castile!
# Landon in The Improvisatrice; and Other Poems/Advert

Poetry may note need a preface but clearly in Miss Landon's view it deserves and advertisement.
ADVERTISEMENT.
Poetry needs no Preface: if it do not speak for itself, no comment can render it explicit. I have only, therefore, to state that The Improvisatrice is an attempt to illustrate that species of inspiration common in Italy, where the mind is warmed from the earliest childhood by all that is beautiful in Nature and glorious in Art. The character depicted is entirely Italian,—a young female with all the loveliness, vivid feeling, and genius of her own impassioned land. She is supposed to relate her own history; with which are intermixed the tales and episodes which various circumstances call forth. Some of the minor poems have appeared in The Literary Gazette. L. E. L.
# Landon in The Improvisatrice; and Other Poems/Gazette 2

The following poem was published previously in The Literary Gazette. It can be accessed either from here or from the full list of contents.
FRAGMENTS.
| CHANGE | 286 |
# Kennebec Railroad v. Portland Railroad/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
81 U.S. 23
Kennebec Railroad v. Portland Railroad
It has been repeatedly decided by this court that the opinion is no part of the record, and it is only by agreement of counsel and consent of the court that it can be looked into for such purpose. As the record, without the opinion, does not show that such a question was decided, we have examined the opinion with care, and have felt bound to look to the whole of it, as well as that part of it relied on by the plaintiff in error; and though the matter which the plaintiff now alleges was one of the principal questions in the case-to wit, that the law under which the foreclosure was had was passed after the mortgage was executed, and that the method of foreclosure prescribed by that statute impaired the obligation of the contract of mortgage, and was, therefore, void by the Constitution of the United States-does not clearly appear from the pleadings, or the decree, or any other proceedings in the case, yet it does appear that the question was discussed in the opinion of the court, and that the court was of the opinion that the statute did not impair the obligation of the contract.
If this were all of the case we should undoubtedly be bound in this court to inquire whether the act of 1857 did, as construed by the court, impair the obligation of the contract.
But a full examination of the opinion of the court shows that its judgment was based upon the ground that the foreclosure was valid, without reference to the statute of 1857, because the method pursued was in strict conformity to the mode of foreclosure authorized, when the contract was made, by the laws then in existence.
Now, if the State court was right in their view of the law as it stood when the contract was made, it is obvious that the mere fact that a new law was made does not impair the obligation of the contract. And it is also clear that this court cannot inquire whether the Supreme Court of Maine was right in that opinion.
Here is, therefore, a clear case of a sufficient ground on which the validity of the decree of the State court could rest even if it had been in error as to the effect of the act of 1857 in impairing the obligation of the contract. And when there is such distinct and sufficient ground for the support of the judgment of the State court we cannot take jurisdiction, because we could not reverse the case though the Federal question was decided, erroneously in the court below, against the plaintiff in error. #fn-s-s
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
# Kenmure's on and awa

* "Kenmure's on and awa, Willie", in Blue e'ed Mary (n.d.), a chapbook printed in Glasgow
* "Kenmure's on and awa", in Massacre of Glencoe (1824), a chapbook printed in Stirling
* "Kenmure's on and awa", in Plowman's ditty (1820), a chapbook printed in Edinburgh
# Kennecott Copper Corporation v. State Tax Commission Silver King Coalition Mines Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
327 U.S. 573
Kennecott Copper Corporation v. State Tax Commission Silver King Coalition Mines Company
Argued: Jan. 30, 31, 1946. --- Decided: March 25, 1946
Messrs.C. C. Parsons, of Salt Lake City, Utah, and Charles A. Horsky, of Washington, D.C., for petitioners.
Messrs.Arthur H. Nielsen and Zar E. Hayes, both of Salt Lake City, Utah, for respondents.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kennard v. Louisiana ex rel. Morgan

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
92 U.S. 480
Kennard v. Louisiana ex rel. Morgan
ERROR to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana.
On the 3d of December, 1872, John H. Kennard was, during a recess of the senate of Louisiana, appointed by the governor associate justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, in place of W. W. Howe, resigned.
On the 4th of January, 1873, the acting governor commissioned P. H. Morgan associate justice of the Supreme Court, in place of W. W. Howe, resigned. Kennard claimed to hold until the expiration of the next regular session of the legislature.
To settle the disputed title to the office, suit was brought. The courts of Louisiana, proceeding under an act of the legislature of Jan. 15, 1873, determined in favor of Morgan.
The case was then brought here upon the ground that the State of Louisiana acting under this law, through her judiciary, had deprived Kennard of his office without due process of law, in violation of that provision of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States which prohibits any State from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property, 'without due process of law.' The provisions of the law are set forth in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Thomas J. Semmes, Mr. Robert Mott, and Mr. N. P. Chipman, for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. Thomas J. Durant, contra.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kennebec Railroad v. Portland Railroad

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
81 U.S. 23
Kennebec Railroad v. Portland Railroad
MOTION by Mr. Artemas Libbey (Mr. A. G. Stinchfield opposing) to dismiss a writ of error to the Supreme Judicial Court of the State of Maine; taken on an assumption that the case fell within the 25th section of the Judiciary Act, quoted supra, 5-6.
This motion had been delayed for some time by an effort on the part of the plaintiff in error to have the record so amended as to show that the State court decided against it one of the questions necessary to give this court jurisdiction; and to obviate this difficulty it was agreed by the parties here that the opinion of that court, delivered at the decision of the case, might be considered as though it were a part of the record.
The suit was a bill in chancery, brought by the Kennebec and Portland Railroad Company against the Portland and Kennebec Railroad Company, asserting the right to redeem the railroad and its appurtenances, which had passed from the former to the latter under what was supposed to be a foreclosure of a mortgage.
The plaintiff set up several grounds for this right to redeem, and he now alleged that one of the principal questions in the case was, that the law under which the foreclosure was had was passed after the mortgage was executed, and that the method of foreclosure prescribed by that statute impaired the obligation of the contract of mortgage, and was, therefore, void by the Constitution of the United States. And though it did not appear clearly from the pleadings or decree, or other proceedings in the case, that this question was involved, it appeared nevertheless that the question was discussed in one part of the opinion of the court, and that the court was of the opinion that the statute did not impair the obligation of the contract. The mortgage was made in 1852. The statute referred to was passed in 1857, and the foreclosure complained of was had shortly after. It appeared at the same time, however, in another part of the opinion, which was a very long one, covering thirty-three 8vo. pages, each much larger than those of these reports, and in a smaller type (long primer) than the body of these books is printed in-a part not referred to in any way by the plaintiff in error-that the court founded its judgment upon the ground that the foreclosure was valid, because the method which was followed conformed exactly to the mode of foreclosure authorized when the contract was made, by the then laws.
Mr. Justice MILLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse