OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Zoological Illustrations/VolI-Pl28

HESPERIA Haworthiana.
Haworth's Hesperia.
Generic Character.
    Antennæ mediocres vel elongatæ, rectæ, graciles; clava subterminali, brevi, crassata, cylindracea; unco abrupto, brevi, acuminato. Palpi in fronte compressi, incurvati, lateribus convexis vel angulatis, articulo ultimo erecto, verticali. Alæ (sedentes) erectæ.
Divisiones.
    III. Palpi lati, in fronte compressissimi. Antennæ breves, clava crassissima.
    III. Palpi pene quadrati, crassissimi. Antennæ elongatæ.
    III. Palpi articulo ultimo longiore, gracile. Antennæ mediocres.
Typus Genericus Hesperia Comma Auctorum.
    Antennæ moderate or elongated, straight, slender, the club nearly terminal, short, thick, cylindric, ending in an abrupt, short and pointed hook. Palpi compressed, incurved in front of the head, the sides convex or angular; the last joint erect, pointing vertically. Wings when at rest erect.
Divisions.
    III. Palpi broad, very compressed in front. Antennæ short, the club very thick.
    III. Palpi nearly square, very thick. Antennæ elongated.
    III. Palpi with the last joint lengthened, slender. Antennæ moderate.
Generic Type Hesperia Comma of Authors.
Specific Character.
    Hesp. (Div. 2.) alis suprà nigrescente-fuscis, basi nitido-cœruleis, anticis fascia mediali hyalina, posticis subtus fuscis, lineis duabus longitudinalibus viridi-flavis; pedibus fusco-aurantiis.
    Hesperia (Div. 2.). Wings above blackish-brown, the base shining blue; anterior with a medial hyaline band; posterior beneath brown, with two longitudinal yellow-green lines. Legs brownish-orange.
The celebrated Latreille, the father of modern Entomology, has well observed, that the immense number of insects crowded together in the genus Hesperia contain many natural genera, but which the paucity of species generally found in cabinets prevents us from discriminating. Having for a long time paid attention to this family, and possessing near 300 species in my own cabinet, I have had the opportunity of attempting their elucidation; and the above generic character is applied to those insects only which I propose considering genuine species of the genus Hesperia, and which will comprise near 170 species.
I have named this new, undescribed and very rare insect, in honour of my esteemed friend A. H. Haworth, Esq. F.L.S., &c., well known by the benefits his writings have conferred on the sister sciences of entomology and botany. The only two insects I ever saw of this species I captured in the southern part of Brazil.
# Zoological Illustrations/VolI-Pl29

MITRA cancellata.
Basket Mitre—upper figure.
Generic Character.—See Pl. 23.
Specific Character.
    M. (Div. 2.) testa fusiformi, cancellata; striis longitudinalibus incrassatis, spira aperturaque æqualibus; columella 5-plicata; spira sublævi.
    Shell fusiform, cancellated, the longitudinal striæ thickened; spire and aperture of equal length; pillar five-plaited; spire nearly smooth.
Another undescribed species of this elegant family, and of great rarity, in the private collection of Mr. G. Humfreys. The whole of the body whorl and commencement of the spire is cancellated. The longitudinal striæ are crowded, thickened, and slightly elevated, giving a crenated appearance to the suture: the transverse striæ slender, and filling up the interstices. The spire is nearly smooth and a little bent: the ground colour very light orange, with three darker interrupted bands on the body: whorl separated by two slender lines of the same colour; the spiral whorls have only two bands and a line between; the upper margins slightly compressed on the suture; the outer lip within smooth.
MITRA rigida.
Ribbed Mitre—middle figures.
Specific Character.
    M. testa costis longitudinalibus, elevatis, linearibus, integris, interstitiis lævibus ad basin granulatis; spira producta; columella 4-plicata; apertura brevi.
    Shell with elevated, longitudinal, obtuse, entire ribs, the interstices smooth, the base granulated; spire lengthened; pillar four-plaited; aperture short.
Equally rare, and from the same collection as the preceding. In habit it approaches nearest to M. exasperata of Chemnitz, but has not the ribs angulated or their interstices striated, and is much more narrowed at the base than in that shell, which I have seen: the outer lip is also smooth; the inside strongly striated. This shell was formerly in the collection of Mr. Keate, the elegant author of the "Sketches from Nature."
# Zoological Illustrations/VolI-Pl34

COLIAS Godartiana.
Godart's Colias.
Generic Character.—See Pl. 5.
Specific Character.
    C. (Fœm.) alis flavescente-fulvis, anticis supra margine punctoque rotundato medio nigris, subtus argenteo rufo 3-fisso, posticis subtus puncto gemino argenteo margine nigro, uno quadrato; palpis productis.
    (Female) Wings fulvous-yellow; anterior above with the outer margin and round central spot black, which beneath is silvery rufous and three-cleft; posterior beneath each with two silvery spots margined with black, one of which is quadrangular. Palpi lengthened.
An inspection of a vast number of insects of this genus, with the possession of nearly all the species noticed by authors, convinces me that the insect now figured is perfectly distinct from any other. It is in the cabinet of Mr. Haworth, who obligingly lent it me for comparison and description, and is the only individual I have hitherto met with. The prolongation of the palpi, which is even more obvious than in C. Statira, is alone a specific distinction; and the form of the spots both on the upper and under side differs very much in character from that insect, with which it has the most affinity. It may be the Papilio Drya of Fabr. (omitting his references); but his description, whether intended for this insect or any other, is so vague that I can see no advantage in retaining it. Of the two bright silver spots beneath, one is oval, the other larger and quadrangular.
I have named it in honour of M. Godart, the intelligent coadjutor of M. Latreille in the entomological part of the Encyclopédie Méthodique.
# Yellow Freight System Inc. v. Donnelly

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
494 U.S. 820
Yellow Freight System Inc. v. Donnelly
No. 89-431 Argued: Feb. 28, 1990. --- Decided: April 17, 1990
Syllabus
After respondent filed a charge against petitioner alleging employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued her a Notice of Right to Sue, which did not identify the forum in which she might sue, but did advise her that she must bring suit within 90 days. Within that period, she filed a complaint in an Illinois county court, alleging that petitioner had discriminated against her on the basis of her sex in violation of the State Human Rights Act. After petitioner filed a motion to dismiss-and outside the 90-day period-respondent moved to amend her complaint to allege that the facts already pleaded also constituted a violation of Title VII. Petitioner removed the case to the Federal District Court and moved to dismiss, contending that, because the state court lacked jurisdiction over a Title VII claim, the original filing in state court could not toll the 90-day period. The District Court rejected this contention and, after a trial on the merits, entered judgment for respondent, which the Court of Appeals affirmed.
Held: Federal courts do not have exclusive jurisdiction over Title VII actions. The fact that Title VII contains no language that expressly confines jurisdiction to federal courts or ousts state courts of their jurisdiction is strong evidence that Congress did not intend to divest state courts of concurrent jurisdiction. Although most legislators, judges, and administrators who have been involved in the enactment and interpretation of Title VII may have expected that such litigation would be processed exclusively in federal courts, such anticipation cannot overcome the presumption, recently reaffirmed in Tafflin v. Levitt, 493 U.S. 455, 110 S.Ct. 792, 107 L.Ed.2d 887 that state courts have the inherent authority, and are competent, to adjudicate federal claims. Pp. 823-826.
874 F.2d 402 (C.A.7 1989), affirmed.
STEVENS, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Jeffrey Ivan Pasek, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.
John J. Henely, Michael W. Rathsack, Chicago, Ill., for respondent.
Justice STEVENS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Yellow Fever

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Yellow Fever."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Yellow Fever" by Roger Sherman Tracy in Popular Science Monthly, 13 (October 1878)
* "Yellow Fever," in The New Student's Reference Work, Chicago: F.E. Compton and Co. (1914)
# Yellow Dog Rag

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Commons category, Wikidata item.
E'er since Miss Susan Johnson lost her Jockey, Lee W. C. Handy W. C. Handy YellowDogRagCover.jpeg
[Verse]
    E'er since Miss Susan Johnson lost her Jockey, Lee,
    There has been much excitement, more to be;
    You can hear her moaning night and morn.
    "Wonder where my Easy Rider's gone?"
    Cablegrams come of sympathy,
    Telegrams go of inquiry,
    Letters come from down in "Bam",
    And ev'ry where that Uncle Sam
    Has even a rural delivery.
    All day the phone rings, but it's not for me,
    At last good tidings fill our hearts with glee,
    This message comes from Tennessee:
[Chorus]
    Dear Sue, your Easy Rider struck his burg today
    On a southboun' rattler sidedoor Pullman car.
    Seen him here an' he was on the hog.
    (spoken) The smoke was broke, no joke, not a jitney on him.
    Easy Riders got a stay way,
    So he had to vamp it but the hike aint far.
    He's gone where the Southern cross' the Yellow Dog.
[Verse]
    I know the Yellow Dog District like a book,
    Indeed I know the route that Rider took;
    Ev'ry crosstie, bayou, burg and bog.
    Way down where the Southern cross' the Dog,
    Money don't zactly grow on trees,
    On cotton stalks it grows wid ease;
    No racehorse, racetrack no grandstand
    Is like Old Beck and Buckshot land,
    Down where the Southern cross' the Dog.
    Every kitchen there is a cabaret,
    Down there the boll wevil works while the darkies glee,
    This Yellow Dog Rag the livelong day.
    (chorus)
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1958, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 65 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Yellowstone National Park

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Yellowstone National Park."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Yellowstone National Park," in Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition (1875–1889)
* "Yellowstone National Park," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Yellowstone National Park," in The New Student's Reference Work, Chicago: F.E. Compton and Co. (1914)
* "Fossil Forests of the Yellowstone" in Popular Science Monthly, 43 (July 1893)
# Zut and Other Parisians

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This work is a collection of short stories: Eleven vignettes of various Parisians and life in Paris around the beginning of the 20th century.

### Author’s Note

C. F. G.
Mon cher ami:
En souvenir de maints beaux jours dont tu as partagé l’allégresse: en attendant d’autres à venir: de ceux-là encore dont tu as adouci la souffrance et l’ennui: par reconnaissance de conseils qu’on n’oublie jamais et de prévoyances dont on se souvient toujours: je te dédie les contes suivants. Tu y retrouveras beaucoup d’amis et peut-être autant d’inconnus: tu les acceuilleras assurément, les uns et les autres, avec cette belle hospitalité qui ne s’est jamais d’ementie, et qui m’a rendu et me rendra encore — espérons-le! — ton obligé et reconnaissant
G. W. C.
    Rough translation of author’s note (from Google Language Tools):
My dear friend:
In memory of many happy days in which you shared the joy: Pending more to come: those of you that still sweetened the pain and boredom: Recognition of advice and never forgotten provident we remember always: I will dedicate the following story. You will find many friends and perhaps as many unknowns: you certainly welcome them, and each other, with that generous hospitality which was never in no way, and that made me and make me again — hopefully! — your obliged and grateful
G. W. C.

### Contents

* Zut
* Caffiard, Deus ex Machina
* The Next Corner
* The Only Son of His Mother
* The Tuition of Dodo Chapuis
* Le Pochard
* A Latter-Day Lucifer
* Poire!
* Papa Labesse
* In the Absence of Monsieur
* Little Tapin
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wisconsin v. Illinois (279 U.S. 821)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
279 U.S. 821
Wisconsin v. Illinois

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wisconsin v. Illinois (279 U.S. 821)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
279 U.S. 821
Wisconsin v. Illinois
and
Messrs. Wm. J. Morgan and Ralph M. Hoyt, both of Milwaukee, Wis., Herman L. Ekern, of Madison, Wis., C. L. Hilton, of St. Paul, Minn., E. C. Turner and C. C. Crabbe, both of Columbus, Ohio, Geo. W. Woodruff, of Philadelphia, Pa., Newton D. Baker, of Cleveland, Ohio, John W. Reynolds, of Madison, Wis., R. T. Jackson, of Mineral Point, Wis., G. A. Youngquist, of St. Paul, Minn., for the State of Wisconsin and others.
Messrs. Edw. J. Brundage, Wm. F. Mulvihill, Morton S.C.ressy, Edmond D. Adcock, Oscar E. Carlstrom, H. A. Brouillet, Jas. Hamilton Lewis, Geo. F. Barrett, and Louis J. Behan, all of Chicago, Ill., J. T. Kenworthy and Cyrus E. Dietz, both of Rock Island, Ill., Hugh S. Johnson, of Springfield, Ill., Maclay Hoyne, of Chicago, Ill., and James M. Beck, of Washington, D. C., for the State of Illinois and others.
Messrs. Wilber M. Brucker, Atty. Gen., A. B. Dougherty, William W. Potter, and Arthur E. Kidder, all of Lansing, Mich., for the State of Michigan.
Messrs. Hamilton Ward, Atty. Gen., of New York City, Albert J. Danaher, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Albany, N. Y., Albert Ottinger, of New York City, R. J. Le Boeuf, Jr., of Albany, N. Y., and Nathan L. Miller, of New York City, for the State of New York.
Messrs. North T. Gentry, of Columbia, Mo., Daniel N. Kirby, of St. Louis, Mo., and Cornelius Lynde, of Chicago, Ill., for intervener State of Missouri.
Mr. F. M. Thompson, of Nashville, Tenn., for intervener State of Tennessee.
Mr. F. E. Daugherty, of Louisville, Ky., for intervener State of Kentucky.
Mr. Percy Saint, of New Orleans, La., for intervener State of Louisiana.
Mr. H. W. Applegate, of Little Rock, Ark., for intervener State of Arkansas.
Mr. Rush H. Knox, of Jackson, Miss., for intervener State of Mississippi.
Motion of the City of Chicago for leave to intervene denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wisconsin v. Illinois (278 U.S. 367)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Wisconsin v. Illinois, 278 U.S. 367 (1929), also referred to as the Chicago Sanitary District Case, is an opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States which held that the equitable power of the United States can be utilized to impose positive action on one state in a situation in which nonaction would result in damage to the interests of other states. Pursuant to Article Three of the United States Constitution, the case was heard under the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction because it involved a controversy between two states, Illinois and Wisconsin. Chief Justice William Howard Taft wrote the opinion for a unanimous Court.Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
278 U.S. 367
Wisconsin v. Illinois
Argued: April 23 and 24, 1928. --- Decided: Jan 14, 1929
[Syllabus and Statement of the Case from pages 367-371 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Albert Ottinger, of New York City, R. J. Le Boeuf, Jr., of Albany, N. Y., Albert J. Danaher, of Watervliet, N. Y., and Nathan L. Miller, of New York City, for the State of New York.
Messrs. Edw. J. Brundage, Wm. F. Mulvihill, Morton S.C.ressy,
[Argument of Counsel from pages 371-376 intentionally omitted.]
Messrs. Wilber M. Brucker, Wm. W. Potter, and Arthur E. Kidder, all of Lansing, Mich., for the State of Michigan.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 376-380 intentionally omitted.]
[[WEST,S.Ct. 164!} Messrs. Wm. J. Morgan and Ralph M. Hoyt, both of Milwaukee, Wis., Herman L. Ekern, of Madison, Wis., C. L. Hilton, of St. Paul, Minn., E. C. Turner and C. C. Crabbe, both of Columbus, Ohio, Geo. W. Woodruff, of Philadelphia, Pa., Newton, D. Baker, of Cleveland, Ohio, John W. Reynolds, of Madison, Wis., R. T. Jackson, of Mineral Point, Wis., and G. A. Youngquist, of St. Paul, Minn., for State of Wisconsin and others.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 380-387 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Edmond D. Adcock, Oscar E. Carlstrom, H. A. Brouillet, Jas. Hamilton Lewis, Geo. F. Barrett, and Louis J. Behan, all of Chicago, Ill., J. T. Kenworthy, and Cyrus E. Deitz, both of Rock Island, Ill., Hugh S. Johnson, of Springfield, Ill., Maclay Hoyne, of Chicago, Ill., and James M. Beck, of Washington, D. C., for the State of Illinois and another.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 387-397 intentionally omitted]
North T. Gentry, of Columbia, Mo., F. M. Thompson, of Nashville, Tenn., F. E. Daugherty, of Louisville, Ky., Percy Saint, of New Orleans, La., Daniel N. Kirby, of St. Louis, Mo., H. W. Applegate, of Little Rock, Ark., Rush H. Knox, of Jackson, Miss., and Cornelius Lynde, of Chicago, Ill., for the State of Missouri and others.
Messrs. A. B. Dougherty,
[Argument of Counsel from pages 397-399 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wisconsin v. Illinois (281 U.S. 179)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
281 U.S. 179
Wisconsin v. Illinois
Argued on Exceptions to Report of Special
Master on Re-reference March 12, 13, 1930.
Decided April 14, 1930.
[Syllabus from pages 179-181 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Raymond T. Jackson, of Mineral Point, Wis., for complainant State of Wisconsin.
Mr. Gilbert Bettman, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for complainant State of Ohio.
Mr. Wilber M. Brucker, of Lansing, Mich., for complainant State of Michigan.
Mr. Newton D. Baker, of Cleveland, Ohio, for complainants.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 181-188 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. John W. Davis, of New York City, Edmund D. Adcock, of Chicago, Ill., and James M. Beck, of New York City, for defendant Sanitary District of Chicago, Ill.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 188-196 intentionally omitted.]
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wisconsin v. Illinois

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Wisconsin v. Illinois."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Wisconsin v. Illinois (278 U.S. 367)
* Wisconsin v. Illinois (279 U.S. 821)
* Wisconsin v. Illinois (281 U.S. 179)
* Wisconsin v. Illinois (281 U.S. 696)
* Wisconsin v. Illinois (287 U.S. 578)
* Wisconsin v. Illinois (289 U.S. 395)
* Wisconsin v. Illinois (309 U.S. 569)
* Wisconsin v. Illinois (311 U.S. 107)
* Wisconsin v. Illinois (352 U.S. 945)
* Wisconsin v. Illinois (352 U.S. 984)
* Wisconsin v. Illinois (355 U.S. 944)
* Wisconsin v. Illinois (360 U.S. 712)
* Wisconsin v. Illinois (388 U.S. 426)
# Women Under Polygamy

* related portals: Polygamy.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
WOMEN UNDER POLYGAMY
page
page
WOMEN UNDER POLYGAMY
BY
WALTER M. GALLICHAN
With 15 Illustrations
page
CONTENTS
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
| TURKISH WOMEN | Frontispiece | Frontispiece |
| A DAUGHTER OF EGYPT | Facing Page | 37 |
| GIRLS OF NORTHERN INDIA | Facing„ Page„ | 55 |
| BURMESE LADIES AT A GARDEN PARTY | Facing„ Page„ | 125 |
| IN THE HAREM. TYPICAL COSTUMES OF CONSTANTINOPLE | Facing„ Page„ | 144 |
| TURKISH BRIDE IN WEDDING DRESS | Facing„ Page„ | 161 |
| EGYPTIAN GIRLS AT THEBES | Facing„ Page„ | 184 |
| AN ARAB WOMAN | Facing„ Page„ | 209 |
| GEORGIAN DANCING GIRLS | Facing„ Page„ | 216 |
| PERSIAN GIRL OF UPPER CLASS | Facing„ Page„ | 234 |
| JAPANESE GIRLS IN BAMBOO AVENUE | Facing„ Page„ | 248 |
| A GEISHA GIRL | Facing„ Page„ | 256 |
| MOORISH WOMEN, ALGIERS | Facing„ Page„ | 262 |
| KING WAMBUGOO, EAST AFRICA, AND HIS SIXTEEN WIVES | Facing„ Page„ | 268 |
| A CHINESE BEAUTY | Facing„ Page„ | 278 |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published in 1914, before the cutoff of January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1946, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 77 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse