OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897)/Ziz

* A
* B
* C
* D
* E
* F
* G
* H
* I
* J
* K
* L
* M
* N
* O
* P
* Q
* R
* S
* T
* U
* V
* W
* Y
* Z
* Gen
* Ex
* Lev
* Num
* Dt
* Jos
* Jdg
* Ru
* 1-2 Sam
* 1-2 Ki
* 1-2 Chr
* Ezra
* Neh
* Est
* Psm
* Prv
* Job
* Song
* Ecc
* Isa
* Jer
* Lam
* Ezek
* Dan
* Hos
* Joel
* Am
* Ob
* Jnh
* Mic
* Nah
* Habk
* Zeph
* Hag
* Zech
* Mal
* Mt
* Mk
* Lk
* Jn
* Act
* Rom
* 1Cor
* 2Cor
* Gal
* Eph
* Philp
* Col
* 1-2Thes
* 1Tim
* 2Tim
* Titus
* Phim
* Hebr
* Jam
* 1Pet
* 2Pet
* 1Jn
* 2Jn
* 3Jn
* Ju
* Rev
Ziz
# Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897)/Ziphah

* A
* B
* C
* D
* E
* F
* G
* H
* I
* J
* K
* L
* M
* N
* O
* P
* Q
* R
* S
* T
* U
* V
* W
* Y
* Z
* Gen
* Ex
* Lev
* Num
* Dt
* Jos
* Jdg
* Ru
* 1-2 Sam
* 1-2 Ki
* 1-2 Chr
* Ezra
* Neh
* Est
* Psm
* Prv
* Job
* Song
* Ecc
* Isa
* Jer
* Lam
* Ezek
* Dan
* Hos
* Joel
* Am
* Ob
* Jnh
* Mic
* Nah
* Habk
* Zeph
* Hag
* Zech
* Mal
* Mt
* Mk
* Lk
* Jn
* Act
* Rom
* 1Cor
* 2Cor
* Gal
* Eph
* Philp
* Col
* 1-2Thes
* 1Tim
* 2Tim
* Titus
* Phim
* Hebr
* Jam
* 1Pet
* 2Pet
* 1Jn
* 2Jn
* 3Jn
* Ju
* Rev
Ziphah
# Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897)/Zizah

* A
* B
* C
* D
* E
* F
* G
* H
* I
* J
* K
* L
* M
* N
* O
* P
* Q
* R
* S
* T
* U
* V
* W
* Y
* Z
* Gen
* Ex
* Lev
* Num
* Dt
* Jos
* Jdg
* Ru
* 1-2 Sam
* 1-2 Ki
* 1-2 Chr
* Ezra
* Neh
* Est
* Psm
* Prv
* Job
* Song
* Ecc
* Isa
* Jer
* Lam
* Ezek
* Dan
* Hos
* Joel
* Am
* Ob
* Jnh
* Mic
* Nah
* Habk
* Zeph
* Hag
* Zech
* Mal
* Mt
* Mk
* Lk
* Jn
* Act
* Rom
* 1Cor
* 2Cor
* Gal
* Eph
* Philp
* Col
* 1-2Thes
* 1Tim
* 2Tim
* Titus
* Phim
* Hebr
* Jam
* 1Pet
* 2Pet
* 1Jn
* 2Jn
* 3Jn
* Ju
* Rev
Zizah
# Virginia Electric Power Company v. National Labor Relations Board

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
319 U.S. 533
Virginia Electric Power Company v. National Labor Relations Board
Argued: May 6, 1943. --- Decided: June 7, 1943
See 320 U.S. --, 64 S.Ct. 27, 88 L.Ed. --.
Messrs. T. Justin Moore and George D. Gibson, both of Richmond, Va., for petitioner.
Mr. Robert B. Watts, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Virginia Law Journal

The Virginia Law Journal is a periodical, published in seventeen volumes from 1877 to 1893.
For further commentary, see Bryson (ed), Virginia Law Books: Essays and Bibliographies, 2000, pp 94 & 272 to 280.
* Volume 1 (1877) External scan External scan
* Volume 2 (1878) External scan External scan
* Volume 3 (1879) (transcription project)
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Domestic Encyclopædia (1802)/Burnt-grain

Edition of 1802.
​BURNT-GRAIN, a distemper incident to corn, and frequently confounded with the smut, though in its nature, very different from the latter. According to Duhamel, the husks, or external coverings of the grains in burnt ears, are, in general, tolerably sound, with this difference only, that when the seeds begin to ripen, they appear drier and more parched than those of the healthy ears. The skin, or bran, which forms the immediate covering of the grain, is not destroyed in this disease, as is the case in the smut: and the infected ears are less firm and consistent in their texture, than the sound ones: the husks of the former also become dry and whitish, in proportion to the increase of the distemper. The grains retain some degree of firmness, and if opened, are found to be full of a brownish substance, emitting a nauseous smell, and being unctuous to the touch.
The most effectual method of preventing a distemper, the cause of which is as little known as that of the smut, is first to wash the seed well in common water, and scum off all the damaged grains that float on the surface, then to steep it in brine, a strong ley of ashes, urine, &c.; lastly, to sprinkle it well with quick-lime, before it is sown.
# Domestic Encyclopædia (1802)/Burgoo

Edition of 1802.
​BURGOO, a kind of porridge, is a nutritive dish, eaten by mariners, and much used in Scotland: it is made by gradually adding two quarts of water to one of oatmeal, so that the whole may mix smoothly; then boiling it for a quarter of an hour, stirring it constantly; after which, a little salt and butter should be added. This quantity, prepared as directed, will serve five or six persons for a meal; and Cockburn considers it very proper for correcting that unwholesome disposition to costiveness, so frequent to persons of a sea-faring life.
# Domestic Encyclopædia (1802)/Burnet, the Great

Edition of 1802.
​BURNET, the Great, or Wild, or Meadow Burnet; the Sanguisorba officinalis, L.; a native plant growing on moist pastures, especially on a marly and calcareous soil, in the North of England. It is a hard, woody plant, and grows from two to three feet high, branching towards the top, and terminated by thick oval spikes of flowers, of a greyish brown-colour, which appear in June and July.
This vegetable ought not to be confounded with the following, or the Upland Burnet, which is a very different genus of plants. The Great, or Wild Burnet, has been usefully employed in the art of dyeing. Vogler dyed wool, silk, linen, or cotton, in a decoction of the dried, brown-red flowers, of a grey colour with a greenish shade, by the addition of alum; of a dark lilac, which soon assumed a beautiful grey, by adding a solution of tin; and of a deep black colour, on dropping into the liquor a solution of copperas.
According to Bechstein, the whole of the wild burnet is used in tinning leather, as a substitute for oak-bark: and the plant is also relished by cattle, especially by sheep.
# Domestic Encyclopædia (1802)/Butter-burr

Edition of 1802.
​BUTTER-BURR, the Common, or Colt's-foot, the Tussilago Petasites, L. is an indigenous plant, growing in moist meadows, pastures, and banks of rivers. Its leaves are the largest of any plant in Britain, and, in heavy rains, afford a shelter to poultry, and other small animals. Its flowers appear in April, before the leaves, as in most other vernal plants. The root, dug up in spring, abounds with a resinous, aromatic matter: it has a strong smell, and a bitterish, acrid taste.
In Germany, the leaves of the butter-burr are bruised, and mixed with chaff, or cut straw; in which state they are fondly eaten by cattle.
Formerly, the root of this plant was highly esteemed as a sudorific, and alexipharmic, for which purposes a dram of it was given for a dose; but, as it has been found to possess those virtues in no very eminent degree, it has again been neglected in the shops. The late Sir John Hill, however, in his "Virtues of British Herbs," published in 1770, calls the common butter-burr an admirable medicine in fevers of the worst kind; as, when taken early, it prevents the mischiefs that often arise naturally in the disease; and oftener from the errors of physicians. Sir John farther informs us, that, about the middle of the last century, when a disease of the putrid kind prevailed in England, the same fever raged also in Germany; and while the English died by bleedings, and by chemical medicines, the Germans lived by the use of the butter-burr. He also very seriously speaks of a heavier visitation, and if the greatest of all calamities should come, there are few things from which we might expect so great relief as this herb. The Greeks used it with the greatest success; and the very name of the plant among the Germans, is pestilence-wort.—We trust, however, there will be no necessity for putting Sir John's assertion to the test of experience; as we should be apprehensive of the result.
# Domestic Encyclopædia (1802)/Butterfly

Edition of 1802.
​BUTTERFLY, or Papilio, in zoology, a well known insect, of ​which there are 273 species, principally distinguished by the colour of their wings.
The beauties of this elegant part of the creation, excite the admiration of every contemplative mind. Many persons, who conceive butterflies to be of a poisonous nature, are frequently under apprehension lest they should eat them with herbs and salads; but such alarm is groundless, as they are perfectly harmless, and equally eatable as snails and oysters.
Mr. Edwards, in his "Natural History of Birds," gives the following curious directions for taking the figure of these insects: Take butterflies, or field-moths, clip off the wings close to their bodies, and lay them on clean paper, in the form of the insect when flying; then have ready prepared gum-arabic, which has been some time dissolved in water, and is of a thick consistence; then pour a drop of ox-gall into a spoonful of this liquid, mix it well together, and spread a little of it on a piece of thin, white paper, wide enough to take both sides of the fly; when it begins to feel clammy, the paper is in proper order to take the down from its wings; lay the gummed side on the wings, and it will adhere so as to take them up; then double the paper, so as to have all the wings between it; lay it on a table, pressing it close with the fingers, or it may be rubbed gently with something hard and smooth; after which, on opening the paper, the wings will come forth transparent; the down of the upper and under sides, adhering to the gummed paper, forms an accurate likeness of both sides of the wings, in their natural shape and colour.
When the gummed papers have been opened, the bodies of the flies should be copied from the natural ones, upon stiff, and separate paper, painted in water colours, and fixed between the representations of the wings.
# Domestic Encyclopædia (1802)/Burying-grounds

Edition of 1802.
​BURYING-GROUNDS are places consecrated to the interment of dead bodies; and have, from the earliest institutions of society, been held in great veneration, both by Heathens and Christians. It is, however, to be regretted, that the latter paid less attention to the influence of such places on the health and comforts of the living, than the more sagacious Pagans, who generally appointed distant and elevated situations, for committing the remains of their friends to the maternal earth.
There can be no diversity of opinion as to the pernicious tendency of burying-grounds in the vicinity of dwelling-houses (see the Article Burial), especially in large and populous cities. Hence Dr. Darwin, in the true spirit of a philanthropic philosopher, boldly, though pertinently, remarks: No burials should be tolerated in churches or church-yards, where the monuments of departed sinners shoulder God's altar, pollute his holy places with dead men's bones, and, by putrid exhalations, produce ​contagious diseases among those who frequent his worship. Proper burial places should be consecrated out of towns, and divided into two compartments: the earth from one of these should be removed once in ten or twenty years, for the purposes of agriculture, when it will be sufficiently saturated with animal decomposition; and sand, or clay, or even soil that is less fertile, should be substituted. Dr. Darwin farther thinks, that the removal of this earth is not likely to shock the relations of the deceased, as the superstition concerning the clay, from which we rose, and into which we return, has gradually vanished before the light of reason. Instances of this happy change occurred, about thirty years ago, in removing a quantity of rich earth from the close of the cathedral at Lichfield; and more lately, in changing a burying-ground at Shrewsbury, both which were executed without exciting superstitious terror, or popular commotion. Although we cannot, in conformity to our professed sentiments, and injustice to the Doctor's benevolent design, on this occasion differ as to the propriety of the expedient he has suggested, yet we doubt whether the tide of prejudice, which influences the multitude, is not, at present, too powerful an obstacle to such innovations. Before attempts of this nature can be made with any hope of permanent success, we venture to say, that much remains to be previously done in our schools, as well as in private education, to unfetter the young mind from the chains of dogmatical slavery, and to inculcate principles of untainted morality, being the most substantial basis of pure Christianity.
# Domestic Encyclopædia (1802)/Bush-vetch

Edition of 1802.
​BUSH-VETCH, or the Vicia sepium, L. an indigenous plant, growing in woods, hedges, pastures, and meadows. Its leaves are doubled together; bunches shorter than the leaves; the stem upright, sometimes four feet high; the blossoms of a dirty purple, and appear in May and June. This plant shoots earlier in spring than any other eaten by cattle; vegetates late in the autumn, and continues green all winter.
Although the culture of the bush-vetch was strongly recommended by Dr. Anderson in 1777, yet from later experience, it appears that it is difficult to collect the seeds, as the pods burst, scatter them about, and being made the nest of an insect, scarcely a third part of them will vegetate. Dr. Withering, however, observes, that a spot of garden-ground, sown in drills with this vetch, was cut five times in the course of the second ear, and produced at the rate of 24 tons per acre of green food, which, when dry, weighed nearly 4 1/2 tons.—The Rev. Mr. Swayne also informs us, in the third volume of the papers of the Bath Society, that he selected part of a field in which the bush-vetch naturally abounded, sowed it with this plant, and it succeeded so well, that he cut it four times in the same year; the produce of the hay was 24 tons 11 1/4 cwt. per acre, which is upwards of one-third more than lucerne generally produces. But Mr. Swayne has since observed to Dr. Withering, that though the bush-vetch is very palatable to all kinds of cattle, its cultivation, on a large scale, would be attended with difficulty, as the seeds are generally devoured by a numerous species of insects.—It is farther remarkable, ​that ants are extremely partial to this vegetable.
# Domestic Encyclopædia (1802)/Bushel

Edition of 1802.
​BUSHEL, a measure of capacity for dry substances, such as grain, pulse, fruit, &c.; it contains, in general, four pecks, or eight gallons; being the eighth part of a quarter.
According to the earliest excise-laws, a London bushel is to contain eight wine gallons of wheat; the gallon, eight pounds of wheat (Troy-weight, which see); the pound, twelve ounces; the ounce, twenty penny-weights; and each penny-weight, thirty-two grains, or corns, of wheat taken from the middle of the ear. But as such grains are of very different weight in different ears, nay, in the same ear, and even in the same field, the uncertainty of this calculation must be obvious. Nevertheless this standard bushel is kept in the Exchequer: when filled with common spring-water, and measured before the House of Commons in 1696, it was found to contain 2145,6 solid inches; and the same water being weighed, amounted to 1131 ounces, and 14 penny-weights, troy. The first malt-act, however, altered these proportions, as it was then enacted, that the legal Winchester bushel should be 18 1/2 inches diameter, and eight inches deep. The coal-bushel was regulated at 19 1/2 inches wide:—thus, says Mr. Renardson, in the 491st number of the "Philosophical Transactions," two measures, both differing from the original one, were legally established; and from time to time innovations were made, till it became difficult to determine, what was meant by the name of any measure.—Beside this inconvenience, the bushel has, in different counties and places, and without any apparent cause for such diversity, been made of different dimensions: at Abingdon and Andover, a bushel contains nine gallons; at Appleby and Penrith, a bushel of peas, rye, and wheat, holds 16 gallons; of barley, big, malt, mixt malt, and oats, 20 gallons. A bushel contains, at Carlisle, 24 gallons; at Chester, a bushel of wheat, rye, &c. is 32 gallons; and of oats, 40; at Dorchester, a bushel of malt and oats is 10 gallons; at Falmouth, the bushel of stricken coals is 16 gallons; of other articles, 20, and usually 21 gallons; at Kingston-upon-Thames, the bushel contains 18 1/2; at Newbury, 9; at Wycomb and Beading, 18 3/4; and at Stamford, 16 gallons.
In ascertaining the accurate weight of a bushel of corn, there is a considerable difference arising both from the nature of the grain, and its relative perfection: thus, a bushel of oats weighs only about 40 pounds; of peas and beans, about 60; and the best wheat should weigh from 62 to 64 pounds.—With greater accuracy, however, may be calculated the cubic, or solid capacity of vessels; so that a bushel containing 2145 inches, will be nearly equal to one foot and a quarter cubic measure: consequently a body of a cart, comprising forty feet, will hold about thirty-two bushels, stricken measure.—If a calculation be made as to the number of perfect grains of wheat, which ought to be in one standard bushel, it will be found that the net amount is 491,520 grains, or 7680 to one pint, or pound.
# Domestic Encyclopædia (1802)/Butter-cup

Edition of 1802.
​BUTTER-CUP, Butter-flower, or Upright Meadow Crow-foot, the Ranunculus acris, L.; a very common weed, abounding in meadows and pastures: it has hairy leaves, and leaf-stalks; and bears yellow flowers in June and July.
Many continental farmers attribute the sudden death of cattle, which is often inexplicable, to their feeding on this plant; and therefore carefully extirpate it from fields and meadows. To ascertain this important point, we request our rural correspondents to communicate to us the result of their experience, which we propose to publish in a future Appendix to this Encyclopædia.—It is, however, certain, that the seed-buds of the butter-cup are extremely acrid, and may therefore be employed for vesicatories, instead of the Spanish fly; though its blossoms are eagerly visited by bees. Indeed, the whole plant is very acrid, and easily blisters the skin. Nevertheless, it is eaten by sheep and goats, but refused by cows, horses, and swine, let their pasture be ever so bare.
# Wives of the prime ministers, 1844-1906

with contributions by Lucy Blanche Masterman
WIVES OF THE
PRIME MINISTERS
1844-1906
BY
ELIZABETH LEE
AUTHOR OF "OUIDA: A MEMOIR" ETC.
with contributions by
Mrs. C. F. G. MASTERMAN
London NISBET & CO. LIMITED 22 BERNERS STREET, W. 1
| First Published | January 1918 |
| Reprinted | August 1918 |
PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN
NOTE
MY most cordial thanks are due to Mrs. Drew for permission to print the extracts from Mrs. Gladstone's manuscript diary, and to reproduce the portrait which forms the frontispiece to this book; to Mr. Wilfrid W. Ashley, who most kindly invited me to Broadlands and gave me permission to print extracts from some of the letters of Lady Palmerston in his possession; to Lady Battersea for a similar permission in regard to letters from Mrs. Disraeli; and to the Hon. George Peel for information about Lady Peel's family and her early childhood. Thanks are also due to Mr. Stuart M. Ellis for information concerning Bulwer and Lady Caroline Lamb. It would be impossible to acknowledge separately the published sources consulted, but I have done so wherever possible.
E. L.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Edmund Clarence Stedman

"Life laid upon his forehead a caress"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1902), "Edmund Clarence Stedman" in The Century Magazine (September 1902).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1904), "Edmund Clarence Stedman" in Mine and Thine.
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "Edmund Clarence Stedman" in Poems I.

## References

* ↑ View this version at Google Books.
# Edmonton Bulletin/Volume 15/Number 18/Town Elections

The annual election of councillors for the town of Edmonton teok place on Tuesday last, January 3rd. As mayor McCauley had been re-elected by acclamation on nomination day, the voting was for councillors only. The following is the return of the votes received by the several candidates:
J. A. McDougall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 K. A. McLeod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 C. F. Strang . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 Jas. Goodridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 Geo. P. Sanderson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 C. Gallagher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 D. R. Fraser . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 J. Cameron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 A. F. Degagne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .46
A. G. Randall, town clerk, acted as returning officer and J. R. Michael as deputy returning officer. The count was begun by the returning officer at 5 o'clock, as soon as the poll had closed, and the result was declared at 6 o'clock. None of the ballots cast were rejected on account of being mismarked. Only two were spoiled in process of voting, and these were replaced in time, so that every vote cast was counted. The total number of votes cast was 128, showing that of all the ballots cast only 21 were not marked for Mr. McDougall, an expression of public confidence of which that gentleman has reason to feel proud. The total number of votes on the list was 268, of whom 176 resident and 92 non-resident. Considering that no person was allowed to vote unless his taxes were paid a very creditable vote was polled. The reason that the vote was so much smaller than the first election last winter was that then a property qualification was not required, while now not only is the property qualification required but the taxes on it must have been paid. The proceedings during the voting were carried on very quiely, although there was a very fair amount of hustling done. In the evening the Fire Brigade band serenaded the successful candidates, while the defeated ones accepted the inevitable with a good grace.