OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Carols for Christmas-tide/Royal Day that chasest gloom

IX. "Royal Day that chasest gloom."
1.Royal Day that chasest gloom,
Day by gladness speeded:
Thou beheld'st from Mary's Womb
How the King proceeded:
Very God, Who made the sky,
Set the sun and stars on high,
Heav'n and earth sustaining:
Very Man, Who freely bare
Toil and sorrow, woe and care,
Man's salvation gaining.
​2.As the sunbeam through the glass
Passeth, but not staineth;
Thus the Virgin, as she was,
Virgin still remaineth;
Blessed Mother! in whose womb
Lay the Light that exiles gloom,
God to earth descending:
Blessed Maid! whose spotless breast
Gives the King of Glory rest,
Nurture, warmth, and tending:
​3. Christ, Who mad'st us out of dust,
Breath and spirit giving:
Christ, from Whose dear steps we must
Pattern take of living:
Christ, Who camest once to save
From the curse and from the grave,
Healing, light'ning, cheering:
Christ, Who now wast made as we,
Grant that we may be like Thee
In Thy next appearing!
# Carols for Christmas-tide/The Condensed Vocal Parts to the Carols for Christmas-tide

Dedicated by permission to the Lord Bishop of Oxford.
Price One Shilling.
1854.
INDEX.
NOTICE.
We have put forth a fuller account of these Carols in the harmonised Folio Edition. It is here sufficient to observe: that the original words and music range from the end of the twelfth to the beginning of the fifteenth century: that we give the music without alteration: and that the words are free imitations, for the most part, of these and other ancient Christmas Carols.
SS. Simon and Jude, 1853.
# Carson Petroleum Company v. Vial

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
279 U.S. 95
Carson Petroleum Company v. Vial
Argued: Feb. 28, 1929. --- Decided: April 8, 1929
Messrs. George M. Burditt and John K. Murphy, both of Chicago, Ill., and William E. Leahy, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Mr. Harry P. Sneed, of New Orleans, La., for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 96-97 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Carson v. Dunham

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
121 U.S. 421
Carson v. Dunham
[ James Lowndes, Clarence A. Seward, A. G. Magrath, and H. E. Young, for appellant.
Wm. E. Earle, for appellee.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Carson v. Hyatt

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
118 U.S. 279
Carson v. Hyatt
SAME
v.
SAME. (Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South Carolina.)
Filed May 10, 1886.
A. G. Magrath, H. E. Young, C. A. Seward, and James Lowndes, for plaintiff error and appellant.
Edward McCrady and Edward McCrady, Jr., for defendant in error and appellee.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Carson v. Long-Bell Lumber Corporation

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
294 U.S. 707
Carson v. Long-Bell Lumber Corporation
Messrs. John S. Leahy and Walter H. Saunders, both of St. Louis, Mo., for petitioners.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Carson v. Long-Bell Lumber Corporation/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
294 U.S. 707
Carson v. Long-Bell Lumber Corporation
For opinion below, see 73 F.(2d) 397.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Carroll v. United States (80 U.S. 151)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
80 U.S. 151
Carroll v. United States
We think that the Court of Claims erred in the decision given by it. The statute of March 12th, 1863, makes the right to recover depend on proof of ownership of the abandoned or captured property, of right to the proceeds, and of the fact that the owner gave no aid or comfort to the rebellion. It is plain to us that the ownership to be proved was that which existed at the time of capture or abandonment, and that the right to the proceeds was that which existed at the time of the petition filed in the Court of Claims. These titles, in their nature, capable of separation, coexisted in the petitioner. True, her ownership was not absolute, nor was her right to the proceeds absolute. She could claim only in a representative capacity-first, in right of the intestate, and, secondly, as trustee for creditors and distributees. At the time of the death of the intestate the cotton was in his possession, unaffected by any proceeding in confiscation. After his death, and upon appointment of his widow as administratrix, the title vested in her unforfeited. It was a title upon which she could maintain trespass or trover. And it was the only title to the property subsisting at the time of the capture and sale and payment of the proceeds into the treasury. The statute does not make it the duty of the court to inquire whether the intestate who had been the owner gave aid and comfort to the rebellion, but whether such aid or comfort was given by the actual owner at the time of capture. This owner, within the sense of the statute, was the administratrix. It would be much more reasonable to institute such inquiries in respect to the creditors and distributees than in respect to the intestate. But such an investigation might be endless, and could not, we think, have been contemplated by the legislature.
We think, therefore, that the Court of Claims erred in not admitting the proof offered by the petitioner, and for this cause the decree must be
REVERSED.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bible (Bishops')/Philemon
## Chapter 1

$^1$Paul a prisoner of Iesus Christ, and brother Timotheus: Unto Philemo the beloued, and our felowe labourer,
$^2$And to the beloued Apphia, and to Archippus our felowe souldier, and to the Churche in thy house:
$^3$Grace to you, and peace from God our father, and the Lorde Iesus Christ.
$^4$I thanke my God, makyng mention alwayes of thee in my prayers,
$^5$Hearyng of thy loue and fayth, which thou hast towarde the Lorde Iesus, and towarde all saintes:
$^6$That the felowshippe of thy fayth may be effectuall in the knowledge of euery good [worke] which is in you, towarde Christe Iesus.
$^7$For we haue great ioy & consolation in thy loue, because the bowels of the saintes are refresshed by thee, brother.
$^8$Wherfore, though I myght be much bolde in Christe, to inioyne thee that which is conuenient:
$^9$Yet for loues sake, I rather beseche thee, beyng such a one as Paul the aged, & nowe also a prisoner of Iesus Christe.
$^{10}$I beseche thee for my sonne Onesimus, whom I haue begotten in my bondes:
$^{11}$Which in tyme passed, was to thee vnprofitable, but nowe profitable to thee and to me.
$^{12}$Whom I haue sent agayne: Thou therefore receaue hym, that is, myne owne bowels,
$^{13}$Whom I woulde haue retayned with me, that in thy steade he myght haue ministred vnto me in the bondes of the Gospell:
$^{14}$But without thy mynde woulde I do nothyng, that thy benefite shoulde not be as it were of necessitie, but willingly.
$^{15}$For happyly he therfore departed for a season, that thou shouldest receaue hym for euer:
$^{16}$Not nowe as a seruaunt, but aboue a seruaunt, a brother beloued, specially to me: but howe much more vnto thee, both in the fleshe, and in the Lorde?
$^{17}$If thou count me therfore a felowe, receaue hym as my selfe.
$^{18}$If he haue iniuried, or oweth [thee ought] that lay to my charge.
$^{19}$I Paul haue written it with myne owne hande, I wyll recompence it: Albeit, I do not say to thee, howe that thou owest vnto me euen thyne owne selfe.
$^{20}$Yea brother, let me enioy this pleasure of thee in the Lorde: Comfort my bowels in the Lorde.
$^{21}$Trustyng in thine obedience, I wrote vnto thee, knowyng, that thou wilt also do more then I say.
$^{22}$Moreouer, prepare me also a lodgyng: for I trust that through your prayers, I shalbe geuen vnto you.
$^{23}$There salute thee Epaphras, my felowe prisoner in Christe Iesus.
$^{24}$Marcus, Aristarcus, Demas, Lucas, my felowe labourers.
$^{25}$The grace of our Lorde Iesus Christ [be] with your spirite. Amen. [Written from Rome, by Onesimus a seruaunt.]
# Braden v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinions

    Black
    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
365 U.S. 431
Braden v. United States
Argued: Nov. 17, 1960. --- Decided: Feb 27, 1961
See 365 U.S. 890, 81 S.Ct. 1024.
Mr. Leonard B. Boudin, New York City and Mr. John M. Coe, Pensacola, Fla., for petitioner.
Mr. J. Walter Yeagley, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice STEWART delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bracht v. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
254 U.S. 489
Bracht v. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Company
Argued: and Submitted Dec. 16, 1920. --- Decided: Jan 3, 1921
Mr. I. N. Watson, of Kansas City, Mo., for petitioner.
Messrs. Samuel Herrick, of Washington, D. C., and R. J. Boyle, of San Antonio, Tex., for respondent.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Brader v. James

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
246 U.S. 88
Brader v. James
Argued: Jan. 7 and 8, 1918. --- Decided: March 4, 1918
[Syllabus from pages 88-89 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. E. A. Blythe, of Hugo, Okl., D. M. Tibbetts, of Guthrie, Okl., and J. H. Brader, of Hugo, Okl., for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Council on pages 89-91 intentionally omitted.]
Messrs. A. M. Works, of Hugo, Okl., and Joseph C. Stone, of Muskogee, Okl., for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 91-93 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice DAY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bracken Hollow

As serialized in Once a Week.
* Part 1
* Part 2
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Antonio Escobar y Mendoza

From volume 5 of the work.
Escobar y Mendoza, Antonio, b. at Valladolid in 1589; d. there July 4, 1669. In his sixteenth year he entered the Society of Jesus. Talent and untiring labor won him distinction for scholarship among the leaders of ecclesiastical science in his age. His writings are recognized as classical and challenge criticism as far as their orthodoxy is concerned. For this reason Pascal's efforts (fifth and sixth Provincial Letters) to fasten the charge of laxism on Escobar's "Manual of Cases of Conscience", together with his unscrupulous insinuations of adroit hypocrisy on Escobar's part, are too base and cowardly to merit serious consideration. At the same time, it is only fair to add that Escobar's writings are not entirely beyond the pale of criticism. Unprejudiced critics find him inexact in quotations, subtle in discussion, obscure and loose in reasoning. Besides the "Manual", Escobar's chief works are: "Summula casuum conscienti" (Pamplona, 1626); "Examen et praxis confessariorum" (Lyons, 1647); "Theologia Moralis" (Lyons, 1650; Venice, 1652); "Universae Theologicae Moralis receptae sententiae" (Lyons, 1663); "De Triplici Statu Ecclesiastico" (Lyons, 1663); "De Justitia et de legibus" (Lyons, 1663).
Escobar was also a preacher of note. For fifty consecutive years he delivered a series of Lenten sermons with signal success.
J. D. O'NEILL
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Antonio Comellas y Cluet

From volume 16 of the work.
A philosopher, born at Berga, in the Province of Barcelona, 16 Jan., 1832; died there, 3 June, 1884. Comellas studied philosophy and theology at Vich, and entered the diocesan seminary at Solsona. After his ordination (17 May, 1856) he continued to teach Latin at Solsona until 1862, when he was appointed professor of theology. During his stay there he published two pamphlets, in which he gave ample evidence of his learning. The first was a discourse, delivered at the opening of the scholastic term, 1866-67, in which he essayed to explain in a new manner the procession of the Three Divine Persons, and the second a translation, accompanied by prologue and interesting notes, of a work by Reginald Baumstark, "Pensamientos de un protestante sobre la invitación del papa á la reconciliación con la Iglesia católica romana" (Barcelona, 1869). To be able to devote himself to his chosen line of work, a few months after the appearance of his philosophic, he resigned his chair of theology in 1871, and withdrew to Berga. Before 1880 he published "Demostración de la armonía entre la religión católica y la ciencia", a work of an apologetic nature, written to refute William Draper's "Conflict Between Science and Religion". In 1883 he wrote his philosophic work, "Introducción á la filosofía, ó sea doctrina, sobre la dirección al ideal de la ciencia" (Barcelona). Gómez Izquierdo, his biographer, says, that "as a philosopher, he [Comellas] was the only thinker who obeying the impulse of his scientific inquisitiveness, rather than the influence and stimulus of those about him, devoured all the most interesting philosophical literature of Europe of his time" and that "in his active mind the echoes of the spiritualism of the Catalonian School and the first murmurs of the Thomistic revival reverberated". One of the distinguishing features in the career of Comellas is that he is to be considered as one of the precursors of the neo-Scholastic movement in Spain.
GÓMEZ IZQUIERDO, Un filosófo catalán, Antonio Comellas y Cluet in Cultura española (Madrid, 1907); ORTÍ Y LARA in La ciencia cristiana (Madrid, 1883); SARDÁ Y SALVANY in Revista popular (Barcelona, 26 March, 1885); CASALS in La Dinastía (Barcelona, 2 August, 1890); DE MOLINS in Diccionario biográfico y bibliográfico de escritores y artistas catalanes del siglo XIX, I, 487; MENÉNDEZ Y PELAYO, Historia de los heterodoxos españoles, III, 824.
R. BOLOS
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Antonio Ferreira

From volume 6 of the work.
A poet, important both for his lyric and his dramatic compositions, b. at Lisbon, Portugal, in 1528; d. there of the plague in 1569. He studied law at Coimbra, where, however, he gave no less ateention to belles-letteres than to legal codes,ardently reading the poetry of classic antiquity. Successful in his chosen profession, he became a judge of the Supreme Court at Lisbon, and enjoyed close relations with eminent personages of the court of John III. Ferreira stands apart from the great majority of the Portuguese poets of his time in that he never used Spanish, but wrote constantly in his native language. Yet he is to be classed with the reformers of literary taste, for, like Sâ de Miranda, he abandoned the old native forms to further the movement of the Renaissance. He manifested a decided interest in the Italian lyric measures, already given some elaboration by Sâ de Miranda, and displayed some skill in the use of the hendecasyllable. The sonnet, the elegy, the idyll, the verse epistle, the ode, and kindred forms he cuitlvated with a certain felicity, revealing not only his study of the Italian Renaissance poets, but also a good acquaintance with the Greek and Latin masters.
It is by his dramatic endeavours that he attained to greatest prominence, for his tragedy "Ines de Castro", in particular is regarded as one of the chief monuments of Portughese literature. He began his work on the drama while still a student at Coimbra, writing there for his own amusement his first comedy, "Bristo", dealing with the old classic theme of lost children and later agnitions, which was often utilized for the stage of the Renaissance and has been made familiar by Shakespeare. Much improvement in dramatic technique is evinced by his second comedy, "O. Cioso", which treats realistically the figure of a jealous husband. It is considered as the earliest character-comedy in modern Europe. Written in prose, it exhibits a clever use of dialogue and has really comical scenes. None of the compositions of Ferreira appeared in print during his lifetime and the first edition of his two comedies is that of 1622. On English translation of the "Cioso" made by Musgrave was published in 1825. His tragedy, "Inés de Casro", imitates in its form the models of ancient Greek literature, and shows ltalian influence in its use of blank verse, but it owes its suject-matter to native Portuguese history, concerning itself with the love of King Pedro for the beautiful for the Ines de Castro, an incident which has also been spendidly treated by Camões in his "Lusiades", and has furnished the theme for at least ten Portughese and four Spanish plays, and over a score of compositions in foreign languages. If tested by the requirements of the theatre, the play is doubtless far frorn perfect, but the purity of its style and diction ensures its popularity with its author's compatriots. It was rendered into English by Musgrave in 1826. The rather free Spanish version of 1577 was made on the basis of a manuscript copy of the Portughese original, for the first Portughese printed edition is of 1587.
J.D.M. FORD
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Antonio Francesco Vezzosi

From volume 15 of the work.
Member of the Theatine Congregation and biographical writer, born at Arezzo, Italy, 4 October, 1708; died in Rome, 29 May, 1783. At an early age he determined to devote himself entirely to the service of God and in 1731 he entered the Theatine Congregation. On account of his unusual abilities he was appointed professor of philosophy at the seminary at Rimini (1736-38). In 1742 he was sent to Rome as professor of theology at San Andrea della Valle. While here he became favourably known for his fine scholarship and loyal orthodoxy. His superiors entrusted him, therefore, with the editing of the collected works of Cardinal Tommasi (11 vols., Rome, 1749-69). The attention of Benedict XIV was thus called to him, and in 1753 the pope appointed him professor of church history at the College of the Sapienza and examiner of candidates for the episcopal office. Later he was also elected general of his congregation. Among his publications are an oration on Leo X, "De laudibus Leonis" (Rome, 1752), and the biographical work, excellent for that era and still useful, "I scrittori de' Chierici regolari detti Teatini" (2 vols., Rome, 1780), which forms the basis of the "Bibliotheca Teatina" of P. Silvos.
PATRICIUS SCHLAGER
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Antonio Lotti

From volume 9 of the work.
Composer, born at Venice in 1667; died there, 5 January, 1740 and studied under Legrenzi, producing an opera, "Il Giustino", in his sixteenth year. On 31 May, 1692, he was appointed second organist of St. Mark's, and on 17 August, 1704, he succeeded Spada as first organist. On 2 April, 1736, he was elected maestro di cappella, though Pollarolo, Porpora, and Porta were formidable rivals for the much-coveted post, with a salary of 400 ducats. Between the years 1703 and 1730 he composed numerous masses and motets, especially his "Miserere", which supplanted the version of Legrenzi and is still sung at St. Mark's on Holy Thursday. Lotti also composed twenty-seven operas (1693-1717), and he spent two years at Dresden, producing various works. After his return to Venice, in November, 1719, he gave up secular writing, and devoted himself solely to church and chamber music. Had he continued at operatic writing his financial success would have been considerable, but he preferred his post as maestro at St. Mark's. One incident in his career was the controversy over a madrigal which Bononcini claimed and which, it is said, led to that eminent composer leaving London, but it is now generally believed that Bononcini was wronged in the matter, as really there was no need for a man of his powers borrowing from Lotti. Moreover the incident occurred in 1731, and Bononcini remained in London for over a year receiving royal patronage. Lotti was an excellent teacher, as is evident from his many famous pupils,e. g., Marcello, Alberti, Bassani, Gasparini, an d Galuppi. He was taken seriously ill in 1736, but lingered until 5 January, 1740, and was interred in the church of St. Geminiano. The monument to his memory was destroyed with the church in 1851.
GROVE, Dict. of Music and Musicians, new ed. (London, 1906); EITNER, Quellenlexikon (1900-04); BURNEY, General History of Music (London, 1789).
W. H. Grattan-Flood.