OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# May We Knit on Sunday

Published in The Literary Digest. October 20, 1917.
The problem of Sabbath observance has come up in various forms in England, where it was decided by certain bishops that no harm could come from working in the fields on the Lord's day. With us the extreme stage of the question has not been reached; but Scranton, Pa., has asked aloud if it is right for women to knit on Sunday for the soldiers, and also whether knitting during church service is proper. An answer is attempted by the Baltimore Sun, speaking ethically, and assurance is given that "so far as knitting garments for our soldiers on Sunday is concerned, even the strictest Sabbatarian might safely include it among permissible works of mercy and necessity." The Sun argues the point with seriousness, even if it does permit itself a stroke of humor at the end of its homily.
    "With all the numberless knitting-needles that are enlisted in the cause there will not be enough woolen articles to keep every soldier warm this winter. Even with spare hours on Sunday utilized, there is no time to be lost if the individual knitting factories are to come anywhere near meeting the demand upon them.
    "The question of knitting in church is, we concede, more debatable. If it is right to fight battles on Sunday, why should it not be right to do helpful and comforting things during church services? It is not inconceivable that a warm stocking would be regarded as far more religious up above than a cold prayer, and that a woolen vest for a soldier of the Lord might be considered in the heavenly court of last resort as more eloquent than many sermons. Nor do we think it could be urged that knitting in church would divert the minds of the congregation from exhortations to piety. Knitting, when fully mastered, becomes largely mechanical, and even beginners could still sing the hymns and listen devoutly to the minister.
    "We acknowledge that knitting is not per se a pious exercise, and that it does not necessarily involve a peaceful frame of mind. The French furies who surrounded the guillotine during the Reign of Terror frequently carried their knitting with them, and rarely missed a stitch even during the most exciting scenes. It would unquestionably be better to knit in church than like Madame Lafarg at such a revolutionary shrine as that at which she and others of her kind worshipped during those memorable days of blood.
    "However this may be decided, we enter a protest right here against one thing: no young woman should be permitted to take her young man along and make him hold the yarn for her in church while she winds it up into a ball. That would certainly be demoralizing to the preacher, and it would surely inspire jealous and irreligious thoughts in the minds of girls who had no young men to hold their yarn. We make this point now both in the interest of religious decorum and of feminine friendship and good feeling."
# May the Grace of Christ Our Savior

    May the grace of Christ our Savior
    And the Father’s boundless love
    With the Holy Spirit’s favor,
    Rest upon us from above.
    Thus may we abide in union
    With each other and the Lord,
    And possess, in sweet communion,
    Joys which earth cannot afford.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# May v. Anderson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Frankfurter

## Dissenting Opinion

    Minton
United States Supreme Court
345 U.S. 528
May v. Anderson
Argued: Jan. 6, 1953. --- Decided: May 18, 1953
Messrs. Ralph Atkinson, Salem, Ohio, F. W. Springer, East Palestine, Ohio, for appellant.
Mr. I. Engle, Waukesha, Wis., for appellee.
Mr. Justice BURTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# May v. Anderson/Dissent Minton

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Frankfurter
* Dissenting Opinion Minton
United States Supreme Court
345 U.S. 528
May v. Anderson
Argued: Jan. 6, 1953. --- Decided: May 18, 1953
Mr. Justice MINTON, dissenting.
The opinion of the Court and the dissent of Mr. Justice JACKSON deal with a jurisdictional question not raised on the record.
As I understand the law of Ohio, 'parents are the legal and natural custodians of their minor children and each parent has an equal right to their custody in the absence of an order, judgment, or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction fixing their custody. Section 8032, General Code. It is well settled that habeas corpus is not the proper or appropriate action to determine, as between parents, who is entitled to the custody of their minor children.' In re Corey, 145 Ohio St. 413, 418, 61 N.E.2d 892, 894 895.
The instant case was a proceeding in Ohio by habeas corpus brought by the father against the mother for the possession of the minor children. The father could not succeed in this habeas corpus action unless he could show that he had an order of a court of competent jurisdiction awarding him the custody of the children. He produced an authenticated copy of a decree of the County Court of Waukesha County, Wisconsin, valid on its face and unappealed from, which awarded him the custody of the children. It is not contended that this decree is void upon its face, nor did appellant, the mother, challenge its validity in Ohio by any responsive pleading to the petition for habeas corpus.
The only question before the Ohio court was whether that court should give full faith and credit to the Wisconsin decree. That unappealed decree was valid on its face, and its validity was not attacked by any pleading. The validity of the decree is not affected by any admission in this case, on or off the record. As far as this record is concerned, the decree of the Wisconsin court was what it purported to be on its face. Since appellant failed to challenge its validity by any pleading, the decree was entitled to full faith and credit in Ohio under Art. IV, § 1 of the United States Constitution. The Ohio court properly accorded the decree full faith and credit, and it was evidence, together with parenthood, which proved the father's right to possession of the children and entitled him to succeed in the proceeding.
I would therefore affirm.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# May v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt Aktiengesellschaft

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
290 U.S. 333
May v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt Aktiengesellschaft
Argued: Nov. 14-15, 1933. --- Decided: Dec 4, 1933
[Syllabus from pages 333-334 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. D. Roger Englar and Henry M. Longley, both of New York City, for petitioners.
Mr. John W. Griffin, of New York City, for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 335-338 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice CARDOZO delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# May v. Heiner

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
281 U.S. 238
May v. Heiner
Argued: March 7, 1930. --- Decided: April 14, 1930
Mr. Charles H. Sachs, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for petitioners.
The Attorney General and Mr. G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 239-241 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Stuart-Menteath, Andrew Agnew

​Stuart-Menteath, Andrew Agnew, member of House of Representatives New Zealand, practises at Reefton and Greymouth, province of Nelson, New Zealand, a student of the Middle Temple 13 Nov., 1880, called to the bar 18 April, 1883 (2nd son of Alexander Stuart-Menteath, of Pau, France); born 7 Feb., 1853 (see Foster's Baronetage).
    Reefton and Greymouth, Nelson, New Zealand.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Stuart, Charles Pole

​Stuart, Charles Pole, M.A., St. John's Coll., Camb., 1852, J.P. Bucks and Beds, a student of Lincoln's Inn 3 May, 1846 (then aged 20), called to the bar 21 Nov., 1851 (2nd son of late William Stuart, Esq., of Aldenham Abbey, Herts, dec.); born 7 May, 1826; married 20 March, 1860, Anne, eldest dau. of Robert Smyth, of Gaybrook, Westmeath, and has issue (see Foster's Peerage, M. Bute).
    Sandymount, Woburn; 36, Hill Street, W.; Oxford and Cambridge Club.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Stuart, Sir Charles James, Bart.

​Stuart, Sir Charles James, Bart., M.A., Univ. Coll., Oxon, 1848, a student of the Middle Temple 15 Jan., 1844, went to the Inner Temple 12 and called to the bar there 28 Jan., 1848 (eldest son of Sir James Stuart, Bart., chief justice of Lower Canada); born 24 Jan., 1824 (see Foster's Baronetage).
    Palazzo Campello, Rome; 20, Chester Square, S.W.; Athenæum, St. James', and Oxford & Cambridge Clubs.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Stuart-Wortley, Charles Beilby

​Stuart-Wortley, Charles Beilby, M.P. Sheffield since 1880, M.A., Balliol Coll., Oxon, 1878, from Rugby, a member of the North-eastern circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 25 Jan., 1873 (then aged 21), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1876 (2nd son of late Rt. Hon. James Archibald Stuart-Wortley, P.C., Q.C., solicitor-general and bencher of the Inner Temple, dec.); born 15 Sept., 1851; married 16 Aug., 1880, Beatrice Harriet Catharine, only child of Thomas Adolphus Trollope, the historian; she died 26 July, 1881, leaving a dau. (see Foster's Peerage, E. Wharncliffe).
    6, Mandeville Place, Manchester Square, W.; 1, King's Bench Walk Temple, E.C.; Carlton, Travellers', Cosmopolitan, and Beefsteak Clubs.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Stubbins, (Hon.) Henry

​Stubbins, (Hon.) Henry, a puisne judge of the Gold Coast Colony since 1883, a student of Lincoln's Inn 17 Nov., 1864 (then aged 19), called to the bar 18 Nov., 1867; born , 1845.
    Accra, Gold Coast Colony.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Stuart, Charles James Fife

​Stuart, Charles James Fife, a student of Lincoln's Inn 5 June, 1854 (then aged 36), called to the bar 7 June, 1858 (only son of Alexander Stuart, Esq., of Corsairthy, co. Banff, dec.); born , 1818.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Stuart, William

​Stuart, William, hon. col. 3rd batt. Bedfordshire regt, retired 1882, undergrad. St. John's Coll., Camb., from Eton, M.P. Bedford 1854-7, 1859-68, chairman of referees 1867-8, J.P., D.L. Beds, J.P. Herts 1848, J.P. Hunts, deputy chairman quarter sessions Beds 1865-79, chairman since April, 1879, a student of the Inner Temple 5 April, 1848 (then aged 23), called to the bar 2 May, 1851 (eldest son of William Stuart, Esq., of Aldenham Abbey, Herts); born 7 March, 1825; married 13 Sept., 1859, Katharine, eldest dau. of John Armytage Nicholson, Esq., J.P.; she died 16 Oct., 1881, leaving issue (see Foster's Peerage, M. Bute).
    Tempsford Hall, Sandy, Beds; 36, Hill Street, Berkeley Square, W.; Carlton and Senior United Service Clubs, S.W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Stuart-Gray, Edmund Archibald

​Stuart-Gray, Edmund Archibald, M.A., Exeter Coll., Oxon, 1866, succeeded on the death of Margaret, Baroness Gray (1878), to the entailed estates of Grays and Kinfauns, when he assumed the additional surname and arms of Gray, a student of the Inner Temple 9 Nov., 1863 (then aged 23), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1867 (eldest son of Rev. Edmund Luttrell Stuart, of Blandford, Dorset); born 5 Nov., 1840; married 6 Sept., 1877, Anna Mary, dau. of late Rev. George John Collinson, of Clapham, Surrey, heir presumptive to the Earl of Moray in all his titles excepting the barony of Gray (see Foster's Peerage).
    Kinfauns Castle, Perth; Gray House, Dundee, Forfarshire; Balmerino, Newport, co. Fife; 19, Manor Place, Edinburgh.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Stuart, John

​Stuart, John, undergraduate Christ Church, Oxon, a student of Lincoln's Inn 21 Jan., 1842 (then aged 20), called to the bar 19 Nov., 1847 (2nd son of Vice-Chancellor Sir John Stuart, late of Lincoln's Inn, a master of the bench, dec.); born , 1822.
    Dalness, Bonaw, N.B.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Stuart, Sir Robert

​Stuart, Sir Robert, Q.C., chief justice North-west Provinces of India (resigned 1884), member of council Edinburgh Univ. 1871-84, knighted 3 Oct., 1871, a member of Faculty of Advocates Edinburgh 1840, a student of Lincoln's Inn 3 Nov., 1853 (then aged 37), called to the bar 6 June, 1856, Q.C. 22 Feb., 1868, bencher 15 April, 1868 (eldest son of Robert Stuart, Esq., late of Annot, co. Stirling, dec.); born , 1816; married 29 March, 1859, Nannie, eldest dau. of late John Hall, Esq., of Dublin.
    Glenhead, co. Stirling, N.B.; 25, Kensington Gardens, Hyde Park, Terrace, W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Innes, (Hon.) Sir Joseph George Long

​Innes, (Hon.) Sir Joseph George Long puisne judge Sydney, New South Wales, since 1881, admitted to bar of New South Wales 1862, district judge in Queensland 1865-9, solicitor-general of New South Wales 1872-3, attorney-general 1873-5, minister of justice 1880-1, member of Legislative Assembly 1872, called to upper house of parliament 1872, knighted 30 Jan., 1875, a student of Lincoln's Inn 10 Nov., 1856 (then aged 22), certificate of honour May, 1859, called to the bar 17 Nov., 1859 (eldest son of Joseph Long Innes, of Sydney, New South Wales, late capt. 39th foot); born 16 Oct., 1834; married , 1865, Emily Janet, dau. of (Hon.) John Smith, of Llanarth, Bathurst, New South Wales, M.L.C.
    Winslow, Sydney, New South Wales; Australia Club.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Iorns, Richard William

​Iorns, Richard William, equity draftsman and conveyancer, a student of Lincoln's Inn 19 Nov., 1867 (then aged 23), called to the bar 10 June, 1870 (eldest son of William lorns, Esq., of Burford, Oxon); born , 1844.
    Southend Cottage, Langley; 15, Clement's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Ingram, William James

​Ingram, William James, B.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1871, M.P. Boston 1874-80, April, 1880, unseated July following, J.P. Surrey, a student of the Middle Temple 12 April, 1869, went to the Inner Temple 15 Jan., 1870 (then aged 22), where he was called to the bar 18 Nov., 1872 (eldest son of late Herbert Ingram, Esq., M.P., of Loudwater, Herts); born , 1848; married , 1874, Mary Eliza Collingwood, eldest dau. of late Edward Stirling, Esq., and has issue.
    Mount Felix, Walton-on-Thames; Swineshead Abbey, Boston, co. Lincoln; Loudwater House, Westgate-on-Sea; New University and University & Public Schools Clubs.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Ings, Edward

​Ings, Edward, went the Oxford circuit, author of The Act for the Abolition of Arrest on Mesne Process in Civil Actions, a student of the Inner Temple 26 Feb., 1830 (then aged 21), called to the bar 1 May, 1835 (eldest son of Edward Ings, of Devizes, attorney-at-law); born , 1809; married 16 April, 1834, Belle Emily Lydia, dau. of Fulmar Craven, Esq., of Craven House, Hants.
    40, Great James Street, Bedford Row, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Inverarity, John Duncan

​Inverarity, John Duncan, B.A., LL.B., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1869, practises before the High Court at Bombay, a student of the Inner Temple 27 May, 1865 (then aged 18), called to the bar 30 April, 1870 (eldest son of Jonathan Duncan Inverarity, of Rosemount, co. Forfar); born , 1847.
    Bombay.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Ingpen, Arthur Robert

​Ingpen, Arthur Robert, LL.B. London Univ. 1882 and a member of Convocation, a student of the Middle Temple 10 Aug., 1876, called to the bar, 7 Nov., 1879 (4th son of Robert Frederick Ingpen, of London); born , ; married and has issue.
    Bedford Hall Balham, 7 Stone Buildings, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Ingram, Thomas Lewis

​Ingram, Thomas Lewis, practises before the High Court at Allahabad, late Queen's advocate Gambia and sometime officiating law professor Canning Coll., Lucknow, a student of the Middle Temple 25 Oct., 1861, called to the bar 11 June, 1867 (3rd son of Thomas Lewis Ingram, of Gambia, Western Africa, merchant); born , ; married 21 Nov., 1872, Victoria Helen Georgiana, only child of late George Skinner, Esq.
    Gambia, Sierra Leone; Allahabad, North-West Provinces India.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Iohnson, Francis Dixon

​Iohnson, Francis Dixon, B.A., St. John's Coll., Camb., 1827, went the Northern circuit, J.P., D.L. co. Durham, a student of Gray's Inn 24 May, 1820, called to the bar 1 May, 1833 (only son of Francis Iohnson, of Aykley Heads, co. Durham); born 25 Dec, 1803; married 18 Jan., 1838, Agnes Harrison, 3rd dau. of late John Greenwood, Esq., of Polefield, co. Lanc., and has issue.
    Aykley Heads, Durham.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Inglis, George Deas

​Inglis, George Deas, practises before the High Court at Allahabad, a student of the Inner Temple 20 Jan., 1868 (then aged 20) called to the bar 1 May, 1871 (eldest son of John Forbes David Inglis, Esq., of Allahabad, India); born , 1848; married 2 Feb., 1875, Louisa Adelaide, youngest dau. of late Charles Henry Cox, of St. Lucia, West Indies.
    Allahabad.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Ingram, Thomas Dunbar

​Ingram, Thomas Dunbar, LL.B. London Univ. 1857, LL.D. Queen's Univ., Ireland, fellow and professor (1866-77) of jurisprudence and Indian law Calcutta Univ., clerk of the Crown, judge of the marine court Calcutta, author of Treatise on the Law of Compensation for Interest in Lands, etc., payable by Public Companies, Registration in India, a student of Lincoln's Inn 24 Jan., 1854 (then aged 27), studentship Jan., 1855, called to the bar 17 Nov., 1856 (2nd son of Rev. William Ingram, late of Pettigo, co. Donegal, dec.); born , 1827.
    33, Wellington Road, Dublin; Calcutta.
# McArthur v. Porter's Lessee/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
This was an ejectment in the Court for the seventh Circuit and District of Ohio, in which the jury found a verdict in the following words: 'We the jury find the defendant guilty of the trespass and ejectment, in the declaration mentioned, and assess the plaintiff's damages to six cents, which verdict is thus rendered, subject to the opinion of the Court on the question reserved by consent of parties, as to so much of the land in controversy, as is contained in the deed of the sheriff of Ross county, to the said defendant, bearing date the ___ day of _____ 1802, and upon that part of the land included in said deed. If the opinion of the Court on the question so reserved by consent, shall be with the plaintiff, that the said deed is not valid to pass the land therein described, then we the jury find the defendant guilty of the trespass and ejectment in the declaration mentioned, accordingly, for that part also; and if the opinion of the Court thereon shall be in favour of the defendant, that said deed, with the other evidences exhibited as part of said title, is valid to pass the fee to the defendant; then the jury find the defendant not guilty of the trespass and ejectment in the said declaration mentioned, as to that part of the lands and premises in controversy.'
This conditional verdict is for the plaintiff, or defendant, accordingto the opinion of the Court on the validity of a deed, with the other evidences exhibited as part of said title. But this deed, and these other evidences of title are not exhibited to the Court, in such manner as to enable us to notice them. A deed does, indeed, form a part of a bill of exception taken to the opinion of the Court, on a motion subsequently made for a new trial. But the Court cannot know, judicially, that this is the same deed which is referred to in the verdict, or what are the other evidences of title which are connected with it. The verdict is too imperfect to enable the Court to render judgment on it.
The judgment of the Circuit Court is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded to the Circuit Court, with directions to set aside the verdict, and to award a venire facias de novo.
This cause came on, &c. in consideration whereof, It is the opinion of this Court, that the judgment of the said Circuit Court in this cause is erroneous, because the verdict is imperfect. It is therefore considered and adjudged by this Court, that the said judgment be, and the same is hereby reversed and annulled. And it is further ordered, that this cause be remanded to the said Circuit Court, with directions to award a venire facias de novo.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McArthur v. Porter's Lessee

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
26 U.S. 626
McArthur v. Porter's Lessee
THIS case came up by writ of error to the Circuit Court of the District of Ohio, and was argued by Mr. Baldwin, for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. Ewing, for the defendant in error. The cause was remanded to the Circuit Court in consequence of a defect in the record, and no opinion having been given by the Court upon the points presented and discussed by the counsel, they are omitted.
Mr. Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court:--

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McBoyle v. United States

McBoyle v. United States, 283 U.S. 25 (1931), was a United States Supreme Court case. Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
283 U.S. 25
McBoyle v. United States
Argued: Feb. 26, 27, 1931. --- Decided: March 9, 1931
Mr. Harry F. Brown, of Guthrie, Okl., for petitioner.
The Attorney General and Mr. Claude R. Branch, of Providence, R. I., for the United States.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Taylor, Henry Martyn

​Taylor, Henry Martyn, M.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1868, fellow and tutor, B.A., third wrangler 1865, a student of Lincoln's Inn 10 Jan., 1867 (aged 24), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1869 (2nd son of Rev. James Taylor, of Wakefield, B.D.); born 6 June, 1842.
    Trinity College, Cambridge.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Taylor, Samuel (b.1859)

​Taylor, Samuel, B.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1882, late lieut. 3rd batt. South Lancashire regt., a member of the Northern circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 11 Oct., 1880 (then aged 21), called to the bar 7 May, 1884 (eldest son of late Samuel Taylor, of Eccleston Hall, co. Lanc.); born 4 July, 1859; married 29 Nov., 1883, Gertrude, 2nd dau. of Rev. Walter Brooksbank, of Thornbarrow, Windermere.
    Eccleston Hall, Prescot; 4, Cheniston Gardens, W.; 13, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Taylor, James

​Taylor, James, M.A., St. John's Coll., Camb., 1870, a student of the Middle Temple 2 Nov., 1864, called to the bar 6 June, 1872 (3rd son of Robert Taylor, Esq., late of Valleyfield, Tasmania, dec.); born , .
    Valleyfield, Tasmania.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Taylor, Robert Watkins

​Taylor, Robert Watkins, a member of the North-eastern circuit, a student of Lincoln's Inn 16 Jan., 1845 (then aged 20), called to the bar 29 Jan., 1850 (only son of Rev. Robert Taylor, late rector of Clifton Campville, co. Stafford, dec.); born , 1825.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Taylor, Robert Wright

​Taylor, Robert Wright, LL.B., B.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1882, educated at St. Peter's School, York, a student of Lincoln's Inn 21 Nov., 1879 (then aged 20), called to the bar 21 June, 1882 (only son of Robert Taylor, of Barton-on-Humber, co. Linc., gent.); born 21 Nov., 1859; unmarried.
    New Hall, Barton-on-Humber, co. Lincoln; 8, Stone Buildings, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.