OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Hartigan v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
196 U.S. 169
Hartigan v. United States
Argued: December 6, 1904. ---
Appellant filed a petition in the court of claims to have declared void his dismissal from the United States Military Academy at West Point, and for judgment for his pay as a cadet from July 27, 1883, to July 1, 1889, amounting to $3,417.
The appellant was duly appointed a cadet in the Military Academy on the 1st day of July, 1880, and served as such until the 27th of July, 1883, when he was summarily dismissed, by order of the President, upon charges of maltreating a new cadet upon guard, as well as other improper conduct. After the dismissal of appellant another cadet was appointed to succeed him, was duly graduated from the Academy, and appointed and commissioned a second lieutenant in the Army, and subsequently a captain of the Twenty-fifth Regiment of Infantry.
The appellant, subsequently to his dismissal, presented petitions respectively to the Adjutant General of the Army and to the Secretary of War, in which he asserted his innocence of the charges made against him, and prayed for reinstatement or trial by court-martial. He also presented a petition April 21, 1888, to the President, asking for a revocation of the order of dismissal, a trial by court-martial, and for an order assigning and appointing him to the Army as of the date of the assignment of the last graduate of his class. The petitions were all denied.
The court of claims held that he was not entitled to recover, and dismissed his petition. 38 Ct. Cl. 346.
L. T. Michener and W. W. Dudley for appellant.
Assistant Attorney General Pradt and Mr. George M. Anderson for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from page 170 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hartman v. Bean

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
99 U.S. 393
Hartman v. Bean
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. T. W. Cotzhausen for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. Assistant Attorney-General Smith, contra.
MR. JUSTICE CLIFFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re Parsons/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
150 U.S. 150
In re Parsons
Argued: to surrender or deliver up the same, but, by his counsel, has in open court announced he would decline and refuse to surrender the same without being ordered so to do by the court;' wherefore he moved the court for an order requiring the said Parsons forthwith to turn over and deliver to him, as the attorney for the United States, the books, papers, and property pertaining to or belonging to that office, taking his receipt as such attorney therefor. Notice of this application was given and accepted on the same day, and thereupon Parsons demurred to the motion upon the grounds that the constitution or laws of the United States did not confer on the president the authority to remove Parsons from the office of United States district attorney, and to appoint O'Neal; that the constitution did not confer the power of appointment or removal during a recess of the senate; that the court had no jurisdiction to make the order prayed for; that 'there are no pleadings, or papers, or suit, or due process of law to authorize the order prayed for in the motion;' 'that the said court had no jurisdiction or authority to recognize the said Emmet O'Neal as stated in said motion, and that there were no pleadings, suit, or due process of law to authorize the said court to recognize the said Emmet O'Neal as United States attorney in said motion.' The demurrer was overruled, and Parsons excepted, and thereupon filed his answer to the motion, averring that he was duly appointed and commissioned by the president of the United States on the 4th of February, 1890, United States attorney for the northern district of Alabama, his commission authorizing and empowering him to perform the duties of that office for the term of four years from its date, which term was fixed by law; that shortly after he qualified and entered upon the discharge of the duties of the office, and had performed them up to the present time; that he had never resigned said office; that he now resided, and had continued to reside since the date of his commission, within the northern district of Alabama, and had given his personal attention to the duties of the office, and no cause of vacancy now existed, or had existed since his appointment; that he had faithfully performed the ---
The judgment is affirmed, for want of bill of exceptions seasonably allowed, upon the authority of Muller v. Ehlers, 91 U.S. 249; Jones v. Grover & Baker S. M. Co., 131 U.S. Append. cl; Bank v. Eldred, 143 U.S. 293, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 450; Glaspell v. Railroad Co., 144 U.S. 211, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 593; Hume v. Bowie, 148 U.S. 245, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 582. Judgment affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re Peterson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
253 U.S. 300
In re Peterson
Argued: March 15, 1920. --- Decided: June 1, 1920
Mr. Abram J. Rose, of New York City, for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 301-303 intentionally omitted]
Mr. George Zabriskie, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re Potts

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
166 U.S. 263
In re Potts
Upon a bill in equity for the infringement of letters patent, an answer denying patentable novelty and infringement, a general replication, and proofs taken and completed, the circuit court sustained the defense of want of novelty, and thereupon, on January 3, 1891, entered a final decree dismissing the bill, for want of equity, with costs. Potts v. Creager, 44 Fed. 680.
The plaintiff appealed to this court, which, on January 7, 1895, held that the letters patent were valid, and had been infringed, and therefore, as appeared by its opinion and mandate, reversed the decree of the circuit court, and remanded the cause to that court for further proceedings in conformity with that opinion. 155 U.S. 597, 610, 15 Sup. Ct. 194.
On February 26, 1895, the circuit court entered a decree, 'in conformity with the said mandate,' setting aside its former decree, and adjudging that the letters patent were valid, and had been infringed, referring the cause to a master to take an account of profits, and awarding a perpetual injunction against the defendants. On July 16, 1895, the master filed his report and account of profits.
Before any action of the circuit court upon the master's report, the defedants, on November 29, 1895, filed a petition for a rehearing, for newly-discovered evidence affecting the novelty of the invention; and that court ordered notice to plaintiff to show cause on January 4, 1896, why that petition should not be granted. On that day, the plaintiff objected, in writing, to the consideration of the petition, 'on the grounds that this court is without jurisdiction or authority in the premises; that the issues sought to be amde by said evidence are not properly before it; and that the proceedings are and have been irregular, and not according to law.' But the circuit court, on January 15, 1896, granted the petition for a rehearing, for reasons stated in its opinion reported in 71 Fed. 574, and, after a hearing upon the new evidence, entered an order on, december 21, 1896, by which, the court being of opinion that the letters patent were 'void for want of invention, in view of said new evidence, and that, therefore, the equities are with the defendants, it is ordered that said petition stand as a supplemental answer, and that the replication as filed be considered as a replication thereto.' Its opinion upon entering that order is reported in 77 Fed. 454.
All the decrees and orders of the circuit court above mentioned were made by Judge Sage.
E. W. Bradford and Chester Bradford, for petitioner.
Edward Boyd, for respondent.
Mr. Justice GRAY, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Impressions on Polly

Corset advertisement
Impressions on Polly.
# Her Prairie Knight

[c. 1904]
| “ | Sir Redmond watched her, his eyes a-shine; Beatrice in this mood was something to worship. He was almost afraid to speak, for fear she would snuff out the tiny flame of hope which her half-finished sentence had kindled. He leaned forward, his face eager. "Beatrice, only say you will go—with me, dear!" Beatrice started; for the moment she had forgotten him. Her eyes kept to the hills. "Go—to England? One trip at a time, Sir Redmond. I have been here only ten days, and we came for three months. Three months of freedom in this big, glorious place——" "And then?" His voice was husky. "And then—freckle lotions by the quart, I expect." | ” |
Layout 4
HER PRAIRIE KNIGHT
CONTENTS
CHAPTER PAGE
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1940, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 83 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Her Prairie Knight, and Rowdy of the "Cross L"

Includes two novellas: Her Prairie Knight and Rowdy of the "Cross L". Romantic stories set in the American Old West, with a leavening of mystery and adventure. More so in Rowdy of the "Cross L.
Layout 4
She was watching the restless moving mass of red backs and glistening horns . . . . Frontispiece. Page 54
Her Prairie Knight
AND
Rowdy of the "Cross L"
BY
B. M. BOWER
(B. M. SINCLAIR)
AUTHOR OF
"Chip, of the Flying 'U,'" "The Lonesome Trail,"
"The Lure of Dim Trails," "The Range
Dwellers," etc.
ILLUSTRATIONS
BY
W. HERBERT DUNTON
G. W. DILLINGHAM COMPANY
PUBLISHERS NEW YORK
Copyright, 1904 and 1906
By STREET & SMITH
Copyright, 1907
By G. W. DILLINGHAM CO.
Her Prairie Knight—Rowdy of the "Cross L" Issued July, 1907
* Her Prairie Knight
* Rowdy of the "Cross L"
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1940, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 83 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Her Losses make our Gains ashamed—

Her Losses make our Gains ashamed — She bore Life's empty Pack As gallantly as if the East Were swinging at her Back. Life's empty Pack is heaviest, As every Porter knows — In vain to punish Honey — It only sweeter grows.
# Holy, Holy, Lord

Holy, holy, holy Lord, God the Father, and the Word, God the Comforter, receive Blessings more than we can give! Mixed with those beyond the sky, Chanters to the Lord Most High, We our hearts and voices raise, Echoing Thy eternal praise.
One, inexplicably Three, Three, in simplest Unity, God, incline Thy gracious ear, Us, Thy lisping creatures, hear! Thee while man, the earth-born, sings, Angels shrink within their wings; Prostrate seraphim above Breathe unutterable love.
Happy they who never rest, With Thy heavenly presence blest! They the heights of glory see, Sound the depths of Deity. Fain with them our souls would vie, Sink as low, and mount as high; Fall o’erwhelmed with love, or soar, Shout, or silently adore.
# Holtzman v. Douglas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
168 U.S. 278
Holtzman v. Douglas
Arthur A. Birney, for plaintiff in error.
N. E. Davis, James S. Edwards, and Job Barnard, for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice PECKHAM delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Holy Queen, we bend before thee

Also published with the title Hymn before the Image of Mary, this translation of the Latin hymn Pulchra tota, sine nota (itself an excerpt of Bernard's Ut jucundas cervus undas) was first published in Caswall's Lyra Catholica, 1849.
* "Hymn before the Image of Mary" in Catholic Hymns (1st ed.), 1853.
* "Hymn before the Image of Mary" in Catholic Hymns (2nd ed.), 1860.
# Holy Russia

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Holy Russia."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Holy Russia", a poem by Edna Dean Proctor
* "Holy Russia", a poem by Iris Tree
# Holy Sepulchre

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Holy Sepulchre."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Holy Sepulchre," in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
* "Sepulchre, The Holy," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
# Holy Sonnets

* related portals: Poetry.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
The Holy Sonnets, also known as the Divine Meditations or Divine Sonnets, are a series of nineteen poems. Twelve of them were published in the 1633 collection Songs and Sonnets; others were published in later collections.Warning: template has been deprecated.
* Holy Sonnet 1
* Holy Sonnet 2
* Holy Sonnet 3
* Holy Sonnet 4
* Holy Sonnet 5
* Holy Sonnet 6
* Holy Sonnet 7
* Holy Sonnet 8
* Holy Sonnet 9
* Holy Sonnet 10
* Holy Sonnet 11
* Holy Sonnet 12
* Holy Sonnet 13
* Holy Sonnet 14
* Holy Sonnet 15
* Holy Sonnet 16
* Holy Sonnet 17
* Holy Sonnet 18
* Holy Sonnet 19
# Holy Sonnets/Holy Sonnet 1

Thou hast made me, and shall Thy work decay? Repair me now, for now mine end doth haste; I run to death, and Death meets me as fast, And all my pleasures are like yesterday. I dare not move my dim eyes any way; Despair behind, and Death before doth cast Such terror, and my feeble flesh doth waste By sin in it, which it towards hell doth weigh. Only Thou art above, and when towards Thee By Thy leave I can look, I rise again; But our old subtle foe so tempteth me, That not one hour myself I can sustain. Thy grace may wing me to prevent his art And thou like adamant draw mine iron heart.
# History of Iowa From the Earliest Times to the Beginning of the Twentieth Century/4/Samuel M. Clark

​ SAMUEL M. CLARK was born in Van Buren County, Iowa, on the 11th of October, 1842. He was educated at the Des Moines Valley College at West Point, in Lee County, and began the study of law when eighteen years of age in the office of Judge George G. Wright and was admitted to the bar at Keokuk in 1864. Immediately thereafter he became associate editor with J. B. Howell of the Gate City, the leading Republican daily of southeastern Iowa. This proved to be his life work for which he rapidly developed remarkable talent and in a few years became one of the ablest and most versatile editorial writers in the State. He was a studious reader of literary and scientific works, an independent and philosophic thinker, his editorials often ranking as finished essays on the subject treated. Few men in Iowa had a wider acquaintance with the notable people of his native State and no one warmer or more abiding friendships. It was one of the greatest pleasures of his busy life to serve his friends. He was a delegate to the Republican National Conventions of 1872, '76 and '80, was seldom absent from the State Conventions of his party and was the author of many of the platforms for a quarter of a century. For a period of fourteen years he was president of the school board of Keokuk and for eight years was postmaster of that city. In 1889 he was appointed by the President Commissioner of the Paris Exposition. In 1894 he was elected to the popular branch of Congress on the Republican ticket and at the close of his first term was reëlected, serving four ​years. Death came to him in the meridian of his useful and noble life on the 11th of August, 1900.
# History of Iowa From the Earliest Times to the Beginning of the Twentieth Century/4/Samuel McNutt

​SAMUEL McNUTT was born near Londonderry, Ireland, November 21, 1825. His father emigrated to America when the son was a child and located on a farm in Delaware. Samuel was educated in Delaware College, taught school and studied law. He removed to Milwaukee where he was admitted to the bar in 1851. He came to Iowa in 1854, and engaged in teaching at Muscatine. He joined D. F. Wells in the publication of the Voice of Iowa, the first educational periodical in the State. In 1856 Mr. McNutt purchased an interest in the Muscatine Enquirer, assuming the editorial management. A few years later he became associate editor of the Dubuque Herald with J. B. Dorr. Up to this time Mr. McNutt had been a “Douglas Democrat” but when the Civil War began he became a warm supporter of Lincoln's administration as a Union Democrat. The “War Democrats” were displeased with the position of the Herald and united in establishing The Evening Union with Mr. McNutt as editor. It was a strong supporter of the war measures of Congress and the President. After the Union was discontinued he became one of the editors of the Dubuque Times, afterwards returning to Muscatine. Having united with the Republican party he was elected in the fall of 1863 Representative in the Legislature where he served by reëlection for six years and at the close of his third term was elected to the Senate for four years. He was one of the early and able advocates of legislative control of railroads and in all matters before the Legislature was an earnest champion of the interests of the industrial classes and the author of many excellent laws. In 1872 he was a prominent candidate for State Treasurer before the Republican Convention but was defeated by the railroad influence which was united against him. In August, 1890, he was appointed by President Harrison United States Consul at Maracaibo, in Venezuela.
# History of Iowa From the Earliest Times to the Beginning of the Twentieth Century/4/Scott M. Ladd

​ SCOTT M. LADD was born at Sharon in the State of Wisconsin on the 22d of June, 1855. His early education was acquired in Sharon ​Academy after which he entered Beloit College, remaining two years, then entered Carthage College where he graduated in 1879. He took the law course in the Iowa State University, finishing in 1881. Locating at Sheldon in O'Brien County, Iowa, in that year, he entered upon the practice of his profession and in 1886 was nominated on the Republican ticket for District Judge of the Fourth Judicial District and elected, entering upon the duties of that office in January following. He was twice reëlected, serving until January 1, 1897. At the Republican State Convention of 1896 he was nominated for Judge of the Supreme Court and was elected over Lemuel R. Bolter, the Fusion candidate, by a plurality of 64,377. The same year, the degree of LL. D. was conferred upon Judge Ladd by Carthage College. He entered upon the duties of Supreme Judge on the 1st of January, 1897.
# History of Iowa From the Earliest Times to the Beginning of the Twentieth Century/4/Samuel Merrill

​ SAMUEL MERRILL, seventh Governor of the State, was born in Oxford County in the State of Maine on the 7th of August, 1822. He ​received a liberal education and when a young man taught school several terms in the south and in his native State. He removed to New Hampshire where he was elected to the Legislature in 1854, serving two sessions. In 1856 he came to Iowa, locating at McGregor, where he opened a general store. In 1859 he was elected on the Republican ticket to the House of the Eighth General Assembly. When the war began in 1861, Mr. Merrill took the contract to furnish three Iowa regiments with clothing before the Government could supply them with uniforms. In 1862 he was commissioned colonel of the Twenty-first Iowa Infantry. He was severely wounded at the Battle of Black River Bridge and was so disabled that he resigned his commission. In 1867 he was nominated by the Republican State Convention for Governor and elected, serving two terms. He removed to Des Moines and, after the close of his second term, engaged in the banking business. With others he established the Citizens' National Bank. He was active in bringing about the great reunion of Iowa soldiers at Des Moines in the summer of 1870. Governor Merrill was for many years an influential trustee of Iowa College at Grinnell. He acquired great wealth in banking and railroad building and finally removed to California. The last years of his life were spent in Pasadena, where he died on the 31st of August, 1899. His funeral was held at Dea Moines and was attended by many of the public officials and prominent men of the State.
# History of Iowa From the Earliest Times to the Beginning of the Twentieth Century/4/Samuel Murdock

​ SAMUEL MURDOCK was born near Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, March 13, 1817. After obtaining a common school education he taught several years, then studied law. In 1841 he came to Iowa, locating at Iowa City, where he opened a law office. In 1842 he removed to Clayton County, making his home near Jacksonville (now Garnavillo). In 1845 he was elected to the Territorial Legislature, serving two terms. In 1855 he was elected judge of the Tenth District which included ten counties of northeastern Iowa. In several of these counties he held the first courts, riding on horseback from one county-seat to another. Judge Murdock was a Democrat but upon the organization of the Republican party became a member as he was strongly opposed to the extension of slavery into the Territories. In 1869 he was elected to the House of the Thirteenth General Assembly. In 1876 he was appointed by the Governor to fill Iowa's Department of Anthropology at the Centennial Exposition. He gathered and there exhibited some of the most interesting specimens of prehistoric man ever found on the continent. Judge Murdock had for many years been investigating the work of the “Mound Builders” and delivering lectures upon the prehistoric races of America. His last public service was at the Semi-Centennial gathering at Burlington in October, 1896, where he was the principal speaker on “Pioneers' Day.” He was the first lawyer in Clayton County, the first judge of the Tenth District and one of the few survivors of the Territorial lawmakers. He died on the 27th of January, 1897.