OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Bayly v. Washington and Lee University

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
106 U.S. 11
Bayly v. Washington and Lee University
ERROR to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana.
The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
John H. Kennard and W. W. Howe, for plaintiff in error.
Henry J. Leavy, for defendant in error.
MILLER, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baylor v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
383 U.S. 852
Howard R. BAYLOR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
Howard R. Baylor, pro se.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baylor v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
383 U.S. 852
Howard R. BAYLOR, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
Denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bayne v. Morris

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
68 U.S. 97
Bayne v. Morris
BAYNE & MORRIS having differences with each other, agreed to refer them to arbitrators, who besides being authorized to determine the amount to be paid, were authorized to award upon what terms, as to time and security, the payment should be made. On the 23d of January, 1858, the arbitrators made an award, and on the 26th of the same month made a second one. Both were received in evidence on the trial below, although the pleadings were framed solely with reference to the last one. This adjudged that Morris should pay to Bayne one sum on the 28th of July, 1858; a second sum on the 20th of January, 1859; and a third sum on the 20th of January, 1860; and that to secure the payment of these sums he should give to Bayne a bond with penalty and surety. No bond being given, Bayne, on the 28th of January, 1858, that is to say, before any of the sums awarded to be paid had fallen due, sued Morris in an action of debt; the declaration setting forth, that 'the defendant hath not given the said plaintiff the said bond for the security of the payments aforesaid, although often thereto requested; nor hath he paid the said money nor any part thereof, but the same to pay hath refused; whereby an action hath accrued to the said plaintiff to have the said sums of money or satisfactory security for the payment of the same, to the damage,' &c.
The court below (the Circuit Court for the District of Maryland), instructed the jury that if the suit was brought before either of the sums of money became due, the plaintiff could not recover, and the correctness of this ruling was the point, on error, here.
No considerable objection was taken below to the validity of the second award, that, to wit, of 26th of January.
Mr. Brent for the plaintiff in error, and Mr. Wallis contra.
Mr. Justice DAVIS, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bayne v. Morris/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
68 U.S. 97
Bayne v. Morris
The court did not pass on the validity of the award as it should have done; but directed the jury to find against the plaintiff, on the ground that the action was premature, neither of the sums awarded to be paid being due when suit was brought.
It is clear that Bayne instituted his action because Morris would not give the security he was required to by the award. And on principle and authority, he had a right to sue when Morris refused to perform any material part of the award. The parties to the submission chose to say to the arbitrators, 'If you order anything to be paid, by one to the other, you must settle how the payment is to be secured.' The arbitrators did decide on the very point submitted to them, and direct the kind of security to be given, and on Morris's failure to give the bond as required he was in default, and a cause of action accrued. He had no right to say to Bayne, 'Wait until the instalments are due, and then I will elect whether or not to keep the award.' The provision for security was equally valid as the order for the payment of money; and it may be nearly as important. The right of action was as perfect, on Morris's refusal to give the penal bond, as it would have been after the credit allowed by the award had expired.
Where goods are sold on credit, and the purchaser agrees to give his note for them, and refuses to do so, it has been held that an action will lie before the credit expires, and that the measure of damages is the price of the goods. The court below, therefore, erred in charging the jury that the right to sue was in abeyance until the time limited by the award for the payment of the money had expired.
Inasmuch as this case is to be remanded, it is proper to say, that in the opinion of the court, the award of the 26th of January is inoperative and void. Arbitrators exhaust their power when they make a final determination on the matters submitted to them. They have no power after having made an award to alter it; the authority conferred on them is then at an end.
Bayne can, if so advised, amend his pleadings and test the correctness of the first award; which not being properly in the case has not been considered by the court, and no opinion is therefore given on the question of its validity.
JUDGMENT REVERSED AND VENIRE AWARDED.

## Notes

* ↑ 2 Parsons on Contracts, 485-6; Cort et al. v. The Ambergate Railway Company, 6 English Law and Equity Reports, 237; Hanna v. Mills, 21 Wendell, 90; Rinehart v. Olwine, 5 Watts & Sergeant, 157; Mussen v. Price, 4 East, 147; Dutton v. Solomonson, 3 Bosanquet & Puller, 582.
* ↑ Russell on Arbitration, 135.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Aunt Caroline's Dixieland Recipes/Cakes/Marshmallow Filling

MARSHMALLOW FILLING
One-fourth pound of marshmallows, Whites of two eggs, One cup of sugar, One-half cup of water.
Boil sugar and water until it spins a thread. Cut up marshmallows and pour boiling water over them to steam. When sugar is done, pour gradually over the whites of two eggs beaten stiff, then add marshmallows; beat until creamy and spread on cake layers.
# Aunt Caroline's Dixieland Recipes/Cakes/Mason and Dixon Cookies

MASON AND DIXON COOKIES
One cup of brown sugar, One-half cup of melted shortening, One egg, One-half cup of sweet milk, One-half teaspoonful of soda sifted with flour, One and one-half cups of flour, One-half cup of chopped raisins, One-half cup of chopped nuts, One-half teaspoonful of salt, Three squares of melted chocolate.
Mix in order given and bake in moderate oven.
# Aunt Caroline's Dixieland Recipes/Cakes/Ginger Snaps

GINGER SNAPS
One-half cup of brown sugar, One cup of molasses, One-half cup of butter, One teaspoonful of baking powder, One teaspoonful of ginger, One-half pint of flour to begin with.
Put butter, powder and sugar into flour, add ginger and molasses. Add more flour if needed. Roll out thin and bake in a quick oven.
# Aunt Caroline's Dixieland Recipes/Cakes/Martha Washington Cake

MARTHA WASHINGTON CAKE
Four eggs, Two cups of sugar, One cup of butter, One cup of sweet milk, Three cups of flour, One teaspoonful of baking powder, One-half pound of raisins, One teaspoonsful each of Cinnamon, cloves and allspice.
Cream butter and sugar and add to well beaten eggs. Next add the milk, flour, baking powder, raisins and spices. Bake in layers in moderate oven.
# Aunt Caroline's Dixieland Recipes/Cakes/Old Dominion Cake

OLD DOMINION CAKE
Cream one cup of butter and two cups of powdered sugar. Add stiffly beaten whites of six eggs, three cups of flour, in which has been sifted two teaspoonsful of baking powder, and one teaspoonful of vanilla. Bake in layers in moderate oven.
# Aunt Caroline's Dixieland Recipes/Cakes/Fruit Cake

FRUIT CAKE
One pound of white sugar, Three-fourths pound of butter, One pound of flour (one quart) sifted, Two pounds of raisins, One pound of currants, One pound of dates, One-half pound of citron, Ten eggs, One pound of figs, One ounce each of cinnamon, nutmeg and cloves, Two teaspoonsful of baking powder mixed in with flour, One wine glass of brandy and one of wine,
Cream butter and sugar and add to well beaten yolks. Then add alternately the flour and whites of the eggs beaten stiff; then the wine and brandy spices. Lastly add the fruit which has been chopped fine and dredged with flour, mix well together and bake about four hours in a slow oven.
# Aunt Caroline's Dixieland Recipes/Cakes/Gold and White Anniversary Cake

GOLD AND WHITE ANNIVERSARY CAKE
Whites of eight eggs, Two cups of sugar, One cup of crisco, Three cups of flour, One cup of milk, Two teaspoons of baking powder.
One teaspoon of vanilla. Cream crisco and sugar and add to stiffly beaten whites, then add the milk. Next beat the flour in lightly, and add baking powder and vanilla. Bake in layer cake tins in a moderate oven.
# Aunt Caroline's Dixieland Recipes/Cakes/Jelly Roll Cake

JELLY ROLL CAKE
4 eggs, 1 cupful of sugar, 1 cupful of flour, 1 teaspoonful of Cream of Tartar, ½ teaspoonful of soda, Pinch of salt, 1 teaspoonful of extract of Lemon.
Beat together eggs and sugar, add salt and extract. Stir into the dry flour the soda and cream of tartar. Mix all together. Bake in a moderate oven, in a large pan, and turn out, when done, on a clean towel, which has been sprinkled with powdered sugar. Spread with jelly and roll while warm.
# Aunt Caroline's Dixieland Recipes/Cakes/Magnolia Sponge Cake

MAGNOLIA SPONGE CAKE
Three eggs beaten separately and then together, One and one-half cups of sugar, One and one-half cups of flour, One and one-half teaspoonsful of baking powder, One-hlf cup-of boiling water.
Mix in the order given and cook in biscuit pan in moderate oven.
# Aunt Caroline's Dixieland Recipes/Cakes/Marguerites

MARGUERITES
Whites of three eggs beaten stiff. Add three tablespoonsful of sugar slowly. Put on top of butterthins and sprinkle over with ground nuts and brown in oven.
# Barney v. Winona St. P R Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
117 U.S. 228
Barney v. Winona St. P R Company
Argued: March 1, 1886. ---
Gordon E. Cole, for appellants.
Thos. Wilson, for appellees.
FIELD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barnfield's Poems/Poems: in diuers humours

Poems:
In diuers humors.
Trahit sua quemque voluptas. Virgil.
LONDON, Printed by G. S. for Iohn Iaggard, and are
to be solde at his shoppe neere Temple-barre,
at the Signe of the Hand and starre.
1598.
# Barnfield's Poems/Poems: in diuers humours/A Remembrance of some English Poets

A Remembrance of some English Poets.
Iue Spenser euer, in thy Fairy Queene: Whose like (for deepe Conceit) was neuer seene. Crownd mayst thou bee, vnto thy more renowne, (As King of Poets) with a Lawrell Crowne.
And Daniell, praised for thy sweet-chast Verse: Whose Fame is grav'd on Rosamonds blacke Herse. Still mayst thou liue: and still be honored, For that rare Worke, The White Rose and the Red.
And Drayton, whose wel-written Tragedies, And sweete Epistles, soare thy fame to skies. Thy learned Name, is sequall with the rest; Whose stately Numbers are so well addrest.
​And Shakespeare thou, whose hony-flowing Vaine, (Pleasing the World) thy Praises doth obtaine. Whose Venus, and whose Lucrece (sweete, and chaste) Thy Name in fames immortall Booke haue plac't. Liue euer you, at least in Fame hue euer: Well may the Bodye dye, but Fame dies neuer.
# Barney v. Watson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
92 U.S. 449
Barney v. Watson
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Mr. Assistant Attorney-General Edwin B. Smith for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. J. Hubley Ashton, contra.
MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barnfield's Poems

The English Scholar's Library. No. 14.
Barnfield's Poems. 1594-1598.
The English Scholar's Library of Old and Modern Works
RICHARD BARNFIELD of Darlaston, Staffordshire, Esquire
Poems
1594-1598
EDITED BY EDWARD ARBER
F.S.A. ETC. LATE EXAMINER IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE TO THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON
WESTMINSTER
ARCHIBALD CONSTABLE AND CO.
1896
(All rights reserved)
CONTENTS.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barnfield's Poems/Poems: in diuers humours/A Comparison of the Life of Man

A Comparison of the Life of Man.
Ans life is vvell compared to a feast,
Furnisht with choice of all Varietie:
To it comes Tyme; and as a bidden guest
Hee sets him downe, in Pompe and Maiestie;
The three-folde Age of Man, the Waiters bee,
Then with an earthen voyder (made of clay)
Comes Death, and takes the table clean away.
FINIS.
# Bacardi Corporation of America v. Domenech

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
311 U.S. 150
Bacardi Corporation of America v. Domenech
Argued: Oct. 22, 1940. --- Decided: Dec 9, 1940
Messrs. Edward S. Rogers, of New York City, and Preston B. Kavanagh and Karl D. Loos, both of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. William Cattron Rigby, of Washington, D.C., for respondent Domenech, Treasurer.
Mr. David A. Buckley, Jr., of Washington, D.C., for intervenor-respondent Destileria Serralles, Inc.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bacchus and Ariadne

* Dramatic Scene II, a poetical scene by Letitia Elizabeth Landon published in The Literary Gazette, 2nd November, 1822.
* Bacchus and Ariadne, the same republished in The Vow of the Peacock and Other Poems (1835).
# Bacchae

* related portals: Ancient Greek drama.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
Βάκχαι (Bakchai, Latin: Bacchae) is a tragedy by Euripides, performed posthumously in 405 BCE. The play is based on the Greek myth of King Pentheus and his mother, and their punishment by the god Dionysus.
English-language translations of Βάκχαι include:
* The Bacchæ, translated by Robert Potter (1781, 1783) 1st ed.
* The Bacchæ, translated by T. A. Buckley (1858)
* The Bacchantes, translated from the Paley text by E. P. Coleridge in The Plays of Euripides (1891) 1913 printing
* The Bacchanals, translated by Arthur S. Way in The Tragedies of Euripides, in English verse (1898)
* The Bacchae of Euripides, translated by Gilbert Murray (1904)

## See also

* Bacchante by Clark Ashton Smith (1939)
* "Maenads" in Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)
This work is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago. Translations of this work may be copyrighted.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bacchus

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Bacchus."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Bacchus, a poem by Ralph Waldo Emerson
* Bacchus, translations of a poem by Homer

### Encyclopaedia articles

* "Bacchus," in Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition (3) (1878)
* "Bacchus," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Bacchus," in The New Student's Reference Work, Chicago: F.E. Compton and Co. (1914)
# Bacchante

From Weird Tales Volume 34, Issue 6
Bacchante by Clark Ashton Smith
Men say the gods have flown;
The Golden Age is but a fading story,
And Greece was transitory:
Yet on this hill hesperian we have known
The ancient madness and the ancient glory.
Under the thyrse upholden,
We have felt the thrilling presence of the god,
And you, Bacchante, shod
With moonfire, and with moonfire all enfolden,
Have danced upon the mystery-haunted sod.
With every autumn blossom,
And with the brown and verdant leaves of vine,
We have filled your hair divine;
From the cupped hollow of your delicious bosom
We have drunk wine, Bacehante, purple wine. ]
About us now the night
Grows mystical with gleams and shadows cast
By moons for ever past;
And in your steps, O dancer of our delight,
Wild phantoms move, invisible and fast.
Behind, before us sweep
Maenad and Bassarid in spectral rout
With many an unheard shout;
Cithaeron looms with every festal steep
Over this hill resolved to dream and doubt.
What Power flows through us,
And makes the old delirium mount amain,
And brims each ardent vein
With passion and with rapture perilous?
Dancer, of whom our votive hearts are fain,
You are that magic urn
Wherefrom is poured the pagan gramarie;
Until, accordantly,
Within our bardic blood and spirit burn
The dreams and fevers of antiquity.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works published in 1939 could have had their copyright renewed in 1966 or 1967, i.e. between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st, 1968.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1961, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 62 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bacchus (Emerson)

Bring me wine, but wine which never grew
* Bacchus in Poems (1847)
* Bacchus in Poems (Household Edition, 1904)
# Bacchus (Homer)

English-language translations of Bacchus include:
* "Bacchus, or the Pyrats", in The Crowne of All Homers Workes (1624), translated by George Chapman
* "Bacchus, or the Rovers", in Translations from Homer (1831), translated by William John Blew
* "Bacchus, or the Pirates", in The Odyssey of Homer, with the Hymns, Epigrams, and Battle of the Frogs and Mice (1853), translated by Theodore Alois Buckley
# Baccus v. Louisiana/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
232 U.S. 334
Baccus v. Louisiana
Argued: and submitted January 19, 1914. --- Decided: February 24, 1914
We accept the construction affixed by the court below to the statute, and upon which alone it could in reason have held that the acts charged were embraced by its provisions. We hence disregard an intimation made in the argument of the defendant in error, that the statute is susceptible of a different interpretation, and therefore that the claim of Federal right which was made below, and which was necessarily passed upon, need not be here considered. It is inconceivable that the statute should mean one thing for the purpose of determining whether the acts charged were within its terms, and should then be held to mean another, for the purpose of escaping the Federal question. Thus considering the case in its true aspect, the single issue to be decided is, Did the state have power, without violating the equal protection or due process of law clause of the 14th Amendment, to forbid the sale by itinerant venders of 'any drug, nostrum, ointment, or application of any kind, intended for the treatment of disease or injury,' although allowing the sale of such articles by other persons? That it did have such authority is so clearly the result of a previous ruling of this court (Emert v. Missouri, 156 U.S. 296 39 L. ed. 430, 5 Inters. Com. Rep. 68, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 367), or, at all events, is so persuasively made manifest by the authorities cited and the reasoning which sustained the ruling of the court in the case just stated, as to leave no room for controversy on the subject (pp. 306, 307) Moreover, the power which the state government possessed to classify and regulate itinerant venders or peddlers, exerted in the statute under consideration, is cumulatively sustained and made, if possible, more obviously lawful by the fact that the regulation in question deals with the selling by itinerant venders or peddlers of drugs or medicinal compounds,-objects plainly within the power of government to regulate.
Affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Aviation Accident Report: Pennsylvania Central Airlines Flight 19

REPORT
OF THE CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD
Of the investigation of an accident involving
aircraft of United States registry NC 21789,
which occurred near Lovettsville, Virginia, on
August 31, 1940.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse