OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Henry VIII (1925) Yale/Text/Epilogue

Layout 2
THE EPILOGUE.
'Tis ten to one, this play can never please All that are here. Some come to take their ease And sleep an act or two; but those, we fear, We've frighted with our trumpets; so, 'tis clear 4 They'll say 'tis naught: others, to hear the city Abus'd extremely, and to cry, 'That’s witty!' Which we have not done neither: that, I fear, All the expected good we're like to hear 8 For this play at this time is only in The merciful construction of good women; For such a one we show'd 'em: if they smile, And say 'twill do, I know within a while 12 All the best men are ours; for 'tis ill hap If they hold when their ladies bid 'em clap.
FINIS.
Footnotes to the Epilogue
Epilogue
​7 that: so that
# Henry VIII (1925) Yale/Text/Prologue

Layout 2
The Prologue
I come no more to make you laugh: things now, That bear a weighty and a serious brow, Sad, high, and working, full of state and woe, Such noble scenes as draw the eye to flow, 4 We now present. Those that can pity here May, if they think it well, let fall a tear; The subject will deserve it. Such as give Their money out of hope they may believe, 8 May here find truth too. Those that come to see Only a show or two, and so agree The play may pass, if they be still and willing, I'll undertake may see away their shilling 12 Richly in two short hours. Only they That come to hear a merry, bawdy play, A noise of targets, or to see a fellow In a long motley coat guarded with yellow, 16 Will be deceiv'd; for, gentle hearers, know, To rank our chosen truth with such a show As fool and fight is, besides forfeiting Our own brains, and the opinion that we bring, 20 To make that only true we now intend, Will leave us never an understanding friend. Therefore, for goodness' sake, and as you are known The first and happiest hearers of the town, 24 ​Be sad, as we would make ye: think ye see The very persons of our noble story As they were living; think you see them great, And follow'd with the general throng and sweat 28 Of thousand friends; then in a moment see How soon this mightiness meets misery: And if you can be merry then, I'll say A man may weep upon his wedding day. 32
Footnotes to the Prologue
Prologue
​The Prologue; cf. n. 3 Sad: serious working: full of pathos state: dignity 9 truth; cf. n. 12 shilling; cf. n. 16 In . . . coat; cf. n. guarded: trimmed 19 As fool and fight is; cf. n. 20 opinion: reputation, intention 21 intend: undertake 22 Will leave us; cf. n. ​25, 26 Cf. n.
# Henry VIII (1925) Yale/Appendix E

Layout 2
Appendix E
Suggestions for Collateral Reading
W. G. Boswell-Stone: Shakespere's Holinshed. London, 1896. Here the passages of the play are compared with those from the Chronicle.
George Cavendish: The Life of Cardinal Wolsey. The New Universal Library, with an introduction by Henry Morley. This account of Wolsey by one who knew him well is accessible in a number of editions.
J.S. Brewer: The Reign of Henry VIII, from his Accession to the Death of Wolsey. London, 1884. This is the most detailed history of the period. Brewer's admiration for Wolsey's statesmanship blinds him to faults in his character.
J. A. Froude: The Reign of Henry VIII. Everyman's Library. Froude's bias against Wolsey will correct Brewer's bias for him.
Martin Hume: The Wives of Henry VIII. London, 1905. Katharine's character and her place in history.
James Spedding: Who Wrote Shakespeare's Henry VIII? Gentleman's Magazine, August, 1850. The famous discussion of the appearance of Fletcher's style in the play.
Robert Boyle: Henry VIII. New Shakespeare Society, 1880, 1886. Massinger's authorship is here upheld.
H. Dugdale Sykes: Sidelights on Shakespeare. Stratford-on-Avon, 1919. Massinger's authorship argued on the ground of analogous phrasing between his known plays and Henry VIII.
Baldwin Maxwell: Fletcher and Henry the Eighth. Manly Memorial Vol., 1928, pp. 104–112. Some doubts concerning Fletcher's alleged part in the play.
​Almost any modern edition will discuss the problems involved. The Cambridge edition of Henry VIII, edited by Aldus Wright, and the Arden edition, edited by D. Nichol Smith, give large amounts of illustrative material.
# Henry VIII (1925) Yale/Text

Layout 2
The Famous History of the Life of King Henry the Eighth
* Prologue
* Act I
* Act II
* Act III
* Act IV
* Act V
* Epilogue
[DRAMATIS PERSONÆ.
King Henry the Eighth.
Cardinal Wolsey.
Cardinal Campeius.
Capucius, Ambassador from the Emperor Charles V.
Cranmer, Archbishop of Canterbury.
Duke of Norfolk.
Duke of Suffolk.
Duke of Buckingham.
Earl of Surrey.
Lord Chancellor.
Lord Chamberlain.
Gardiner, Bishop of Winchester.
Bishop of Lincoln.
Lord Abergavenny.
Lord Sandys.
Sir Thomas Lovell.
Sir Henry Guilford.
Sir Anthony Denny.
Sir Nicholas Vaux.
Cromwell, Servant to Wolsey.
Griffith, Gentleman-Usher to Queen Katharine.
Doctor Butts, Physician to the King.
Brandon, and a Sergeant-at-Arms.
Queen Katharine, Wife to King Henry.
Anne Bullen, her Maid of Honour; later Queen.
An Old Lady, Friend to Anne Bullen.
Patience, Woman to Queen Katharine.
Scene: London and Westminster; once at Kimbolton.]
# Henry VIII (Shakespeare)

* related portals: Elizabethan drama.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, quotes, Wikidata item.
A historical play, first performed in 1613. The play is generally thought to be a collaborative effort between Shakespeare and John Fletcher.
* The Famous History of the Life of King Henry the Eight, from a facsimile copy of the First Folio (1623) (transcription project)
* The Life of King Henry the Eighth, from The Plays of William Shakespeare, in eight volumes, vol. V, with notes by Samuel Johnson (1765) IA
* King Henry the Eighth, edited by D. Nichol Smith, The Warwick Shakespeare (1899) IA
* The Famous History of the Life of King Henry VIII, edited by Charles Knox Pooler, The Works of Shakespeare, The Arden Shakespeare, 1st ser. (1915) IA
* The Life of King Henry the Eighth, edited by John M. Berdan and Tucker Brooke, The Yale Shakespeare (1925)
* The Life of King Henry the Eighth, unsourced edition
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago. Translations or editions published later may be copyrighted.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Henry VIII and the English Monasteries

The Revised Popular Edition
* Preface
* Introduction
* Chapter 1
* Chapter 2
* Chapter 3
* Chapter 4
* Chapter 5
* Chapter 6
* Chapter 7
* Chapter 8
* Chapter 9
* Chapter 10
* Chapter 11
* Chapter 12
* Chapter 13
* Chapter 14
* Chapter 15
* Chapter 16
* Chapter 17
* Chapter 18
* Chapter 19
* Chapter 20
* Chapter 21
* Chapter 22
* Appendix
* General Index
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1929, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 94 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Henry VIII (1925) Yale/Appendix D

Layout 2
Appendix D
The Text of the Present Edition
The text of the present volume is based, by permission of the Oxford University Press, upon that of the Oxford Shakespeare, edited by the late W. J. Craig. Craig's text has been carefully collated with the Shakespeare Folio of 1623, and the following deviations have been introduced:
1. The stage directions of the Folio have been restored. Necessary words and directions, omitted by the Folio, are added within square brackets.
2. Spelling has been normalized to accord with modern English practice; e.g., Blackfriars, Sandys, everywhere, warlike, vainglory, reverend, sovereign (instead of Black-Friars, Sands, every where, war-like, vain-glory, rev'rend, sov'reign). The punctuation has been largely revised, and a number of old-fashioned Folio forms restored; e.g., th' effects, t' aspire, y' are (you're), burthen (burden).
8. The following changes of text have been introduced, usually in accordance with Folio authority. The readings of the present edition precede the colon, while Craig's readings follow it.
I. i. 42–45 All was royal . . . his full function (assigned to Buckingham F): (assigned to Norfolk)
47 As you guess (assigned to Norfolk F): (assigned to Buck.)
63 a' (O F): he
78 upon,—: upon;
80 in,—: in
120 venom'd-mouth'd F: venom-mouth'd
144 till 't F: till it
ii. 32 longing F: 'longing
57 compels F: compel
147, 148 Henton F: Hopkins
​190 Bulmer: Blumer F
iii. 59 h'as (Ha's F): he has
iv. 77 'em F: them
86 Ye F: You
II. i. 53 S. d. (Follows line 54 in Craig)
106 'em F: them
ii. 7 'em F: them
60 has (ha's F): hath
64 Who's F: Who is
99 mine F: my
107 unpartial F: impartial
iii. 97 moe (mo F): more
iv. 125 Gent. Ush. F: Grif.
183 many-maz'd: many maz'd F
215 I then F: Then I
223 drives F: drive
III. i. 65 in a F: in
114, 115 you F: ye
118 h'as (ha's F): he has
157 'em F: them
ii. 30 letters F: letter
32 How that F: That
78 in's F: in his
103 An F: A
234 lords F: lord
400 him F: 'em
443 by it F: by 't
IV. i. 79 before 'em F: before them
ii. 49 an humble F: a humble
50 honour. From F: honour from
V. i. 11 and F: an
172, 173 an F: a
iii. 73 y' are F: you are
107 Chan.: Cham. F
133 his F: this
177 he's F: he is
iv. 2 Parish-garden (Parish Garden F): Paris-garden
7 ye F: you
86 y' are F: ye 're
v. 76 H'as ('Has F): He has
# Helvering v. Safe Deposit & Trust Company of Baltimore

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
316 U.S. 56
Helvering v. Safe Deposit & Trust Company of Baltimore
Argued: March 9, 1942. --- Decided: April 13, 1942
Messrs. Francis Biddle, Atty. Gen., and Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Mr. Charles McH. Howard, of Baltimore, Md., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Richter

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
312 U.S. 561
Helvering v. Richter
Argued: March 3-4, 1941. --- Decided: March 17, 1941
Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen'l, for petitioner.
Richard H. Wilmer, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Sabine Transportation Company/Dissent Black

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Black
United States Supreme Court
318 U.S. 306
Helvering v. Sabine Transportation Company
Argued: Feb. 4, 1943. --- Decided: March 1, 1943
Mr. Justice BLACK, with whom Mr. Justice DOUGLAS and Mr. Justice MURPHY concur, dissenting.
The taxpayer, Sabine Transportation Co., Inc., is a Delaware corporation doing business in Texas. Its stock is held in equal amounts by two other corporations, Sabine Towing Co., Inc., and The Pure Oil Corporation. In 1937, a dividend of $530,000.00 was declared, amounting to $35.33 1/3 per share on the common stock. The dividend was paid to the two corporate owners by execution of ten year, eight per cent notes. The taxpayer then claimed and was allowed a 'dividend paid credit' under the 1936 Act on its 1937 tax. In 1938 the taxpayer paid to its two corporate stockholders the full face value of the ten year notes. It is now given a second 'dividends paid credit' under the 1938 Act on its 1938 tax.
This $530,000.00 has left the corporate treasury only once. Bookkeeping devices and paper contrivances should not be permitted to make two payments out of one; and if two deductions are permitted, why not three or more? The possibilities of manipulation of notes, bonds, stocks, and every other cash substitute imaginable, are particularly apparent when, as here, the taxpayer and its stockholders are so closely interrelated. Congress has passed no tax statutes which compel me to conclude that it intended to reward ingenuity in paper work by granting multiple tax deductions for a single money payment to discharge a single corporate obligation.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Salvage Salvage

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
297 U.S. 106
Helvering v. Salvage Salvage
Argued: Dec. 20, 1935. --- Decided: Jan 13, 1936
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Golden W. Bell, Asst. Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for Helvering.
Mr. John G. Jackson, of New York City, for Salvage.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Richter/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
312 U.S. 561
Helvering v. Richter
Argued: March 3-4, 1941. --- Decided: March 17, 1941
Because the decision below, 3 Cir., 114 F.2d 452, was in conflict with that of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in Helvering v. Hormel, 111 F.2d 1, affirmed this day, 312 U.S. 552, 61 S.Ct. 719, 85 L.Ed. --, we granted certiorari 'limited to the first question presented by the petition for the writ.' 311 U.S. 641, 61 S.Ct. 172, 85 L.Ed. --. The petition stated that question as follows:
'The taxpayer transferred securities to a third party in trust to pay the income to his wife. At the end of five years, or earlier if the beneficiary consented, the securities were to be transferred back to the taxpayer. The Board of Tax Appeals held that the grantor was not taxable with respect to the income from the trust. Two questions are presented:
'1. Whether, by invoking the general gross income provisions of Section 22, the Commissioner had so changed the theory of the Government's case on appeal as to preclude the Circuit Court of Appeals from considering the issue.
'2. Whether, on the merits, the trust income was taxable as income of the grantor under Section 22.'
In view of the limited grant of certiorari, the second question is not before us. On the first question, the Circuit Court of Appeals held that it could not consider the applicability of section 22(a), 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 669, that being an 'issue now for the first time presented by the Commissioner.' (114 F.2d 453.) The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, which the Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed, was handed down prior to our decision in Helvering v. Clifford, 309 U.S. 331, 60 S.Ct. 554, 83 L.Ed. 788. Respondent urges that had he been advised with fair certainty that the government relied upon section 22(a), he could have introduced additional evidence directed to that issue. For reasons set out in our decision in Hormel v. Helvering, we are of opinion that the Circuit Court of Appeals was in error in its conclusion, but we are also of opinion that respondent is entitled to introduce additional evidence if he so desires. The judgment is accordingly reversed, with directions to the court below to remand to the Board of Tax Appeals for rehearing in the light of the Clifford case.
Reversed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Sabine Transportation Company
## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
318 U.S. 306
Helvering v. Sabine Transportation Company
Argued: Feb. 4, 1943. --- Decided: March 1, 1943
Mr. Arnold Raum, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Charles I. Francis, of Houston, Tex., for respondent.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Goszler v. The Corporation of Georgetown

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
19 U.S. 593
Goszler v. The Corporation of Georgetown
March 15th.
THIS cause was argued by Mr. Key for the appellant, and by Mr. Jones for the respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gossip Wolf and the Fox

* related portals: Brothers Grimm.
* sister projects: Commons category, Wikidata item.
English-language translations of Der Fuchs und die Frau Gevatterin include:
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gothic Stories

Pub’d at the Act direct Dec$^r$ 15. 1798 by S. Fisher London.
Page 16
Gothic Stories.
SIR BERTRAND’s ADVENTURES IN A RUINOUS CASTLE:
THE STORY OF FITZALAN:
THE ADVENTURE JAMES III. OF SCOTLAND HAD WITH THE WEIRD SISTERS, IN THE DREADFUL WOOD OF BIRNAN:
THE STORY OF RAYMOND CASTLE:
THE RUIN OF THE HOUSE OF ALBERT:
AND MARY, A Fragment.
Third Edition, with Additions.
LONDON: Printed and Sold by S. FISHER, No. 10, ST. JOHN’s LANE, CLERKENWELL; ALSO SOLD BY T. HURST, No. 32, Paternoster Row; 1800.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gothic Stories/Mary; a Fragment

MARY.
A Fragment, from the Monthly Cabinet.
The castle-clock struck one; the night was dark, drear, and tempestuous. Henry set in an antique chamber of it, over a wood fire, which, in the stupor of contemplation, he had suffered to decrease into a few half lifeless embers; on the table by him lay the portrait of Mary; the features of which were not very perfectly disclosed by a taper that just glimmered in the socket. He took up the portrait, however, and gazed intensely upon it, till the taper, suddenly burning brighter, discovered to him a phenomenon, he was no less terrified than surprised at. The eyes of the portrait moved; the feature, from an angelic smile, changed to a look of solemn sadness; a tear Hole down each cheek, and the bosom palpitated as with sighing.
Again the clock struck one–it had struck the same hour but ten minutes before. Henry heard the castle gate grate on its hinges it–slammed too–the clock struck one again; and a deadly groan echoed through the castle. Henry was not subject to superstitious fears; ​neither was he a coward; yet a hero of romance might have been justified in a case like this, should he have betrayed fear. Henry’s heart sunk within him; his knees smote together, and, upon the chamber door being opened, and his name uttered in a hollow voice, he dropped the portrait to the floor; and sat, as if riveted to the chair, without daring to lift up his eyes. At length, however, as silence again prevailed, he ventured, for a moment, to raise his eyes, when–my blood freezes as I relate it–before him stood the figure of Mary in a shroud; her beamless eye fixed upon him with a vacant stare; and her bared bosom exposing a most deadly gash. “Henry! Henry! Henry!” she repeated in a hollow tone–“Henry! I am come for thee! thou hast often said that death with me was preferable to life without me; come, then, and enjoy all the ecstasies of love these ghastly features, added to the contemplation of a charnel-house, can inspire;” then, gasping his hand with her icy fingers, he swooned; and instantly found himself stretched on the hearth of his master’s kitchen; a romance in his hand, and the house-dog by his side, whose cold nose touching his hand, had awakened him.
# History of Iowa From the Earliest Times to the Beginning of the Twentieth Century/4/La Vega G. Kinne

[L. G. Kinne]
​ LA VEGA G. KINNE is a native of Syracuse, New York, where he was born on the 5th of November, 1846. He graduated at the high school then, taking the law course in the Michigan University, graduated in 1868 and was admitted to the bar at Ottawa, Illinois. In September, 1869, he removed to Iowa, locating at Toledo, in Tama County where he entered upon the practice of his profession. In the summer of 1881 he was nominated for Governor by the Democratic State Convention and made a vigorous canvass of the State but the Republican majority was too large to be overcome. In 1883 he was again nominated by his party for the same position, again meeting with defeat by his former competitor, Governor Buren R. Sherman. At various times he has been the Democratic candidate for United States Senator, District Attorney and Circuit Judge. He was a delegate to the National Democratic Convention in 1876 and again in 1884. In 1886 he was elected judge of the District Court and reëlected in 1890. In 1891 he was nominated by his party for judge of the Supreme Court and was elected for a full term of six years. Judge Kinne has the distinction of being the first and only Democrat ever elected to that position by the people of Iowa since it became a State. In 1894 Judge Kinne was one of the commissioners from Iowa, upon uniform legislation in the several States. In 1896 he was president of the Iowa Bar Association. For ten years he has been law lecturer at the State University and lecturer before the Iowa College of Law at Des Moines. He is the author of “Kinne’s Pleadings and Practice.” When the State Board of Control was established by act of the General Assembly, Judge Kinne was appointed one of the three members and has served as president of the board.
# History of Iowa From the Earliest Times to the Beginning of the Twentieth Century/4/Lemuel R. Bolter

​ LEMUEL R. BOLTER was born in Richland County, Ohio, July 27, 1834. He received a college education and taught for a short time. In 1852 he made the overland trip to California, remaining there two years. He returned to the States in 1854, taught in Michigan and studied law. Mr. Bolter became a resident of Iowa in 1863, locating on a farm in Harrison County. In 1866 he was admitted to the bar and the same year was elected Representative in the House of the Eleventh General Assembly. He was a member of the House in the Fifteenth, Sixteenth, Nineteenth and Twentieth General Assemblies and a member of the Senate ​in the Twenty-first, Twenty-second, Twenty-third, Twenty-fourth, Twenty-seventh and Twenty-eighth General Assemblies. He enjoyed the distinction of having served more terms in the Iowa Legislature than any other citizen, having been a member twenty-two years in the aggregate. Mr. Bolter was nominated by the Democrats of the Eighth District for Congress in 1876 but was defeated. He was a life-long Democrat and one of the leaders of his party in the State for a quarter of a century. He died on the 29th of April, 1901.