OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# National Geographic Magazine/Volume 31/Number 5/The Red Cross Spirit Speaks
## The Red Cross Spirit Speaks

By John H. Finley
I kneel behind the soldier's trench, I walk 'mid shambles' smear and stench,  The dead I mourn; I bear the stretcher and I bend O'er Fritz and Pierre and Jack to mend  What shells have torn.
I go wherever men may dare, I go wherever woman's care  And love can live; Wherever strength and skill can bring Surcease to human suffering,  Or solace give.
I am your pennies and your pounds; I am your bodies on their rounds  Of pain afar; I am you, doing what you would If you were only where you could—  Your avatar.
The cross which on my arm I wear, The flag which o'er my breast I bear,  Is but the sign Of what you'd sacrifice for him Who suffers on the hellish rim  Of war's red line.
Source: John H. Finley (May 1917), “The Red Cross Spirit Speaks”, The National Geographic Magazine 31(5): 474.
# Michigan Citizens for an Independent Press v. Thornburgh/Concurrence Stevens

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Stevens
Justice STEVENS, concurring in the judgment.
Had this case arisen in 1977, I would have subscribed to the interpretation of the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act that the Supreme Court of Virginia adopted in White v. Norfolk & Western R. Co., 217 Va. 823, 232 S.E.2d 807, cert. denied, 434 U.S. 860, 98 S.Ct. 186, 54 L.Ed.2d 133 (1977). I continue to believe that the text of the Act "merely provides coverage for people who do the work of longshoremen and harbor workers amphibious persons who are directly involved in moving freight onto and off ships, or in building, repairing, or destroying ships," and that the Act's history in no way clouds the text's plain import. See Director, OWCP v. Perini North River Associates, 459 U.S. 297, 328, 342, 103 S.Ct. 634, 652-653, 660, 74 L.Ed.2d 465 (1983) (STEVENS, J., dissenting). The White opinion reaches a similar conclusion. See White, 217 Va., at 833, 232 S.E.2d, at 813 (employing a "direct involvement" test).
Yet, as the majority correctly observes, ante, at 44-45, the Federal Courts of Appeals have consistently interpreted the Act's status requirement to encompass repair and maintenance workers. That uniform and consistent course of decision has established a reasonably clear rule of law that I feel bound to respect. Cf. Commissioner v. Fink, 483 U.S. 89, 102-103, 107 S.Ct. 2729, 2736-2737, 97 L.Ed.2d 74 (1987) (STEVENS, J., dissenting). I therefore concur in the Court's judgment.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Micrographia/Chapter 28

From the Leaves, and Downs, and Beards of Plants, we come at last to the Seeds; and here indeed seems to be the Cabinet of Nature, wherein are laid up its Jewels. The providence of Nature about Vegetables, is in no part manifested more, then in the various contrivances about the seed, nor indeed is there in any part of the Vegetable so curious carvings, and beautifull adornments, as about the seed; this in the larger sorts of seeds is most evident to the eye; nor is it lest manifest through the Microscope, in those seeds whose shape and structure, by reason of their smalness, the eye is hardly able to distinguish.
Of these there are multitudes, many of which I have observ'd through a Microscope, and find, that they do, for the most part, every one afford exceeding pleasant and beautifull objects. For besides those that have various kinds of carv'd surfaces, there are other that have smooth and perfectly polish'd surfaces, others a downy hairy surface; some are cover'd onely with a skin, others with a kind of shell, others with both, as is observable also in greater seeds.
Of these seeds I have onely described four sorts which may serve as a specimen of what the inquisitive observers are likely to find among the rest. The first of these seeds which are described in the 17. Scheme, are those of Corn-Violets, the seed is very small, black, and shining, and, to the naked eye, looks almost like a very small Flea; But through the ​ Schem. XVII. ​ Schem. XVIII. ​Microscope, it appears a large body, cover’d with a tough thick and bright reflecting skin very irregularly shrunk and pitted, insomuch that it is almost an impossibility to find two of them wrinkled alike, so great a variety may there be even in this little seed.
This, though it appear’d one of the most promising seeds for beauty to the naked eye, yet through the Microscope it appear’d but a rude mishapen seed, which I therefore drew, that I might thereby manifest how unable we are by the naked eye to judge of beauteous or less curious microscopical Objects; cutting some of them in sunder, I observ'd them to be fill'd with a greenish yellow pulp, and to have a very thick husk, in proportion to the pulp.
# Micrographia/Chapter 31

Observ. XXXI.Of Purslane-seed.
THe Seeds of Purslane seem of very notable shapes, appearing through the Microscope shap’d somewhat like a nautilus or Porcelane shell, as may be seen in the XX. Scheme, it being a small body, coyl’d round in the manner of a Spiral; at the greater end whereof, which represents the mouth or orifice of the Shell, there is left a little white transparent substance, like a skin, represented by B B B B, which seems to have been the place whereunto the stem was join'd. The whole surface of this Coclea or Shell, is cover’d over with abundance of little prominencies or buttons very orderly rang’d into Spiral rows, the shape of each of which seem'd much to resemble a Wart upon a mans hand. The order, variety, and curiosity in the shape of this little seed, makes it a very pleasant object for the Microscope, one of them being cut asunder with a very sharp Pen-knife, discover’d this carved Casket to be of a brownish red, and somewhat transparent substance, and manifested the inside to be fill’d with a whitish green substance or pulp, the Bed wherein the seminal principle lies invelop’d.
There are multitudes of other seeds which in shape represent or imitate the forms of divers other sorts of Shells: as the seed of Scurvy-grass, very much resembles the make of a Concha Venerea, a kind of Purcelane Shell; others represent several sorts of larger fruits, sweat Marjerome and Pot-marjerome represent Olives. Carret feeds are like a cleft of a Coco-Nut Husk; others are like Artificial things, as Succory seeds are like a Quiver full of Arrows, the seeds of Amaranthus are of an exceeding lovely shape, somewhat like an Eye: The skin of the black and shrivled seeds of Onyons and Leeks, are all over knobbed like a Seals skin. Sorrel has a pretty black shining three-square seed, which is picked at both ends with three ridges, that are bent the whole length of it. It were almoft endless to reckon up the several shapes, they are so many and so various; Leaving them therefore to the curious observer, I shall proceed to the Observations on the parts of Animals.
# Micrographia/Chapter 30

The small seeds of Poppy, which are described in the 19. Scheme, both for their smalness, multiplicity and prettiness, as also for their admirable soporifick quality, deserve to be taken notice of among the ​ Schem. XIX. ​ Schem. XX. ​other microscopical seeds of Vegetables: For first, though they grow in a Case or Hive oftentimes bigger then one of these Pictures of the microscopical appearance, yet are they for the most part so very little, that they exceed not the bulk of a small Nitt, being not above 1/32part of an Inch in Diameter, whereas the Diameter of the Hive of them oftentimes exceeds two Inches, so that it is capable of containing near two hundred thousand, and so in all likelihood does contain a vast quantity, though perhaps not that number. Next, for their prettiness, they may be compar'd to any microscopical seed I have yet seen; for they are of a dark brownish red colour, curiously Honey-comb'd all over with a very pretty variety of Net-work, or a small kind of imbosment of very orderly rais'd ridges, the surface of them looking not unlike the inside of a Beev's stomack. But that which makes it most considerable of all, is, the medicinal virtues of it, which are such as are not afforded us by any Mineral preparation; and that is for the procuring of sleep, a thing as necessary to the well-being of a creature as his meat, and that which refreshes both the voluntary and rational faculties, which, whil'st this affection has seis'd the body, are for the most part unmov'd, and at rest. And, methinks, Nature does seem to hint some very notable virtue or excellency in this Plant from the curiosity it has bestow'd upon it. First, in its flower, it is of the highest scarlet-Dye, which is indeed the prime and chiefest colour, and has been in all Ages of the world most highly esteem'd: Next, it has as much curiosity shew'd also in the husk or case of the seed, as any one Plant I have yet met withall; and thirdly, the very seeds themselves, the Microscope discovers to be very curiously shap'd bodies; and lastly, Nature has taken such abundant care for the propagation of it, that one single seed grown into a Plant, is capable of bringing some hundred thousands of seeds.
It were very worthy some able man's enquiry whether the intention of Nature, as to the secundary end of Animal and Vegetable substances might not be found out by some such characters and notable impressions as these, or from divers other circumstances, as the figure, colour, place, time of flourishing, springing and fading, duration, taste, smell, &c. For if such there are (as an able Physician upon good grounds has given me cause to believe) we might then, insteed of studying Herbals (where so little is deliver'd of the virtues of a Plant, and less of truth) have recourse to the Book of Nature it self, and there find the most natural, usefull, and most effectual and specifick Medicines, of which we have amongst Vegetables, two very noble Instances to incourage such a hope, the one of the Jesuite powder for the cure of intermitting Feavers, and the other of the juice of Poppy for the curing the defect of sleeping.
# Michigan Lawyer

The Michigan Lawyer is a periodical, published from 1875 to 1879.
* Volume 1 (1875) (transcription project)
* Volume 2 (1877) External scan
** Number 1 IA
* Volume 3 (1877) External scan
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Michigan National Bank v. Michigan

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Whittaker
United States Supreme Court
365 U.S. 467
Michigan National Bank v. Michigan
Argued: Jan. 18 and 19, 1961. --- Decided: March 6, 1961
See 365 U.S. 874, 81 S.Ct. 900.
Mr. Victor W. Klein, Detroit, Mich., for appellants.
Mr. William D. Dexter, Lansing, Mich., for appellees.
Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Michigan Insurance Bank v. Eldred (130 U.S. 693)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
130 U.S. 693
Michigan Insurance Bank v. Eldred
[Statement of Case from pages 693-695 intentionally omitted]
George P. Miller, for plaintiff in error.
Alfred Cary and F. C. Winkler, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice GRAY, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Michigan Insurance Bank v. Eldred

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Michigan Insurance Bank v. Eldred."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Michigan Insurance Bank v. Eldred (130 U.S. 693)
* Michigan Insurance Bank v. Eldred (143 U.S. 293)
# Michigan Law Review

MICHIGAN
LAW REVIEW
* Volume 1 (1902-03)
* Volume 2
* Volume 3
* Volume 4
* Volume 5
* Volume 6
* Volume 7
* Volume 8
* Volume 9
* Volume 10
* Volume 11
* Volume 12
* Volume 13
* Volume 14
* Volume 15
* Volume 16
* Volume 17
* Volume 18
* Volume 19
* Volume 20 (1921-22)
* Volume 21
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Munich

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Munich."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
Munich is the capital of the German federal state of Bavaria. Many works have been published using the title Munich, either referring to the city itself or to München, the Old German word from which it derives, meaning monks.
* "Munich," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Munich," in The Encyclopedia Americana, New York: The Encyclopedia Americana Corporation (1906)
# Municipal

* Kipling, Rudyard (1899, 1919), "Municipal" in Departmental Ditties and Ballads and Barrack-Room Ballads.
* Kipling, Rudyard (1919), "Municipal" in Rudyard Kipling's Verse, Inclusive Edition, 1885-1918.
# Munger, Theodore Thornton

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Munger, Theodore Thornton."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Munger, Theodore Thornton," in The Cyclopædia of American Biography, New York: (1903)
* “Munger, Theodore Thornton”, in The Encyclopedia Americana, 1906

### See also

* author page: Theodore Thornton Munger
# Modern Socialism

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Modern Socialism."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Modern Socialism, an 1886 essay by Annie Besant
* Modern socialism, as set forth by socialists in their speeches, writings, and programmes, an anthology of socialist works edited by Robert Charles Kirkwood Ensor
# Modern Woodmen of America v. Mixer

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
267 U.S. 544
Modern Woodmen of America v. Mixer
Argued: March 18, 1925. --- Decided: April 13, 1925
Mr. Nelson C. Pratt, of Omaha, Neb., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 544-548 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. J. J. McCarthy, of Ponca, Neb., and Geo. W. Leamer, of South Sioux City, Neb., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 548-550 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Modern Views on Matter/Front matter

THE ROMANES LECTURE
1903
Modern Views on Matter
BY
SIR OLIVER LODGE, Hon.D.Sc., F.R.S.
DELIVERED
IN THE SHELDONIAN THEATRE, JUNE 12, 1903
SECOND EDITION
OXFORD
AT THE CLARENDON PRESS
1903
Price Two Shillings net
# Millet (Rolland)

MILLET
BY
ROMAIN ROLLAND
PROFESSOR OF THE HISTORY OF ART AT THE ÉCOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE, PARIS
LONDON. DUCKWORTH & CO. NEW YORK: E. P. DUTTON & CO.
PORTRAIT OF LITTLE ANTOINETTE FEUARDENT
Photograph—Braun, Clément & Co.]
Translated from the French text of M. Romain Rolland by Miss Clementina Black.
CONTENTS
PAGE
CHAPTER I
CHAPTER II
CHAPTER III
CHAPTER IV
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
PAGE
# Millet (Rolland)/Bibliography

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Alfred Sensier. La vie et l'œuvre de Jean François Millet. 1881. 8vo.
Alfred Sensier. Souvenirs sur Theodore Rousseau. 1872. 8vo. (Dedicated to Millet.)
Alexandre Piédagnel. Jean Francois Millet. Souvenirs de Barbizon. 1876. Veuve A. Cadart. (Comprising : Millet chez lui ; Notice sur J. F. Millet, and a catalogue of the works that were in Millet's studio at his death.)
Edward Wheelwright. Recollections of Millet. (Atlantic Monthly. September 1876. Reproduced in French in the Revue Britannique, November 1876, without the author's name.)
Philippe Burty. Maîtres et petits - maîtres. 1877. Charpentier. ​André Michel. J. F. Millet et I' exposition de son œuvre a l'Ecole des Beaux Arts. (Gazette des Beaux Arts, 1887.)
André Michel. Notes sur l'art moderne. 1896. Colin.
J. K. Huysmans. Certains. 1889. Stock.
Yriarte. J. F. Millet. 1884.
John W. Mollet. The painters of Barbizon. Vol.1. 1890. London. (Contains a fairly complete bibliography of English works upon the Barbizon painters.)
Georges Lanoë and Tristan Brice. Histoire de l'Ecole Française de pay sage, depute le Poussin jusqu'à Millet. 1901. Charles.
Charavay. Une lettre de Millet. (Cosmopolis, April 1898.)
# Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. Braud

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
270 U.S. 59
Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. Braud
Argued: Jan. 13, 1926. --- Decided: Feb 1, 1926
Messrs. J. B. Morris and J. Austin Barnes, both of Beaumont, Tex., and G. Bowdoin Craighill and Hannis Taylor, Jr., both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 60 intentionally omitted]
Mr. M. G. Adams, of Beaumont, Tex., for defendants in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 61 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Millet (Rolland)/front matter

The Popular Library of Art
Others in Preparation.
# New Jersey Steamboat Company v. The Collector

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
85 U.S. 478
New Jersey Steamboat Company v. The Collector

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# New Jersey v. City of New York

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "New Jersey v. City of New York."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* New Jersey v. City of New York (283 U.S. 473), ( 75 L.Ed. 1176 ), ( 51 S.Ct. 519 )
* New Jersey v. City of New York (284 U.S. 585), ( 76 L.Ed. 506 ), ( 52 S.Ct. 120 )
* New Jersey v. City of New York (290 U.S. 237), ( 78 L.Ed. 291 ), ( 54 S.Ct. 136 )
* New Jersey v. City of New York (296 U.S. 259), ( 80 L.Ed. 214 ), ( 56 S.Ct. 188 )

## See Similar

* City of New York v. New Jersey (Disambiguation)
* New Jersey v. State of New York (Disambiguation)
# New Jersey Zinc Company v. Trotter/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
108 U.S. 564
New Jersey Zinc Company v. Trotter
This was an action of trespass brought by Trotter to recover damages of the New Jersey Zinc Company for entering on his lands and digging up and carrying away a quantity of franklinite ore. There were three counts in the declaration-two quare clausum fregit, and one de bonis asportatis. The plea was not guilty. No other issue was raised by the pleadings. Neither party set up title, so that the only matter in dispute was the liability of the zinc company to pay for the ore which it was alleged had been wrongfully taken and carried away. Trotter recovered a judgment for $3,320 damages, and $752.25 costs of suit. From that judgment the zinc company brought this writ of error, which Trotter now moves to dismiss because the value of the matter in dispute does not exceed $5,000.
As we decided at the present term in Hilton v. Dickinson, ante, 424, our jurisdiction is determined by the value of the matter in dispute in this court, and the matter in dispute here in the present case is the judgment below for less than $5,000. It may be that the question actually litigated below related to the title of the parties to the land from which the ore in controversy was taken, and that the verdict will be conclusive on that question as an estoppel in some other case; but, as was also said at the present term, in Elgin v. Marshall, 106 U.S. 579, [S.C.. 1 SUP. CT. REP. 484,] for the purpose of estimating the value on which our jurisdiction depends, reference can only be had to the matter actually in dispute in the particular cause in which the judgment to be reviewed was rendered, and we are not permitted to consider the collateral effect of the judgment in another suit between the same or other parties. It is the money value of what has been actually adjudged in the cause that is to be taken into the account, not the probative force of the judgment in some other suit. Here the thing and the only thing adjudged is that the zinc company was guilty of the particular trespass complained of, and must pay Trotter $3,320 for the ore taken away. Had the zinc company pleaded title to the land from which the ore was taken, and issue had been joined on that plea, a different question would have been presented. In that way, the land might have been made the matter for adjudication, and thus the matter in dispute on the record. But, as this case stands, only the possession of Trotter and his right to the ore are involved. It may be that, in order to find possession in Trotter, the jury were compelled to find that he had title to the land, and that in this way the verdict and the judgment may estop the parties in another suit; but that will be a collateral, not the direct, effect of the judgment.
The motion to dismiss is granted.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse