OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Hymns for the Amusement of Children (1791)/Hope

HYMN II. HOPE.
Ah! Hannah, why should'st thou despair,  Quick to the Tabernacle speed; There on thy knees prefer thy pray'r,  And there thy cause to mercy plead.
5 Her pious breathings now ascend,  As from her heart the sighs she heaves; And angels to her suit attend,  Till strong in hope she now conceives.
Then Samuel soon was brought to light  10 To serve the Lord, as yet a child — O what a heart — reviving sight!  Sure Cherubims and Seraphs smil'd.
Thus yet a child may I begin,  To serve the Lord with all my heart; 15 To shun the wily lures of sin,  And claim the prize, or e're I start.
Notes
    The story of Hannah and the birth of her son Samuel (1 Sam. 1), was favorite of Smart's (see "Jubilato Agno", B458 etc.).
* ↑ 9—10. See 1 Sam. 2:11.
* ↑ 16. And claim the prize, or e're I start. — "e're" printed as "ere" in ed. 1772 and 1786, and "before" in ed, 1772a. Cf. Phil. 3:14: "I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus".
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hymns for the Amusement of Children (1791)/Humility

HYMN VII.
HUMILITY.
Folly builds high upon the Sand, But lowly let my Basis be; Firm as a Rock my Hope shall stand, Deep founded in Humility.
Content, when threat'ning Ills obtrude, Sweet meek-ey'd Patience, arm my Soul; And let a prudent Fortitude Teach me my passions to controul.
My God, I long to know Thee still, To love, and fear, and trust Thee more, <10> To live submissive to thy Will, And whilst I feel thy Grace, adore.
My Faith and Love, obedient be; Dear Saviour! teach me thy Commands; My ardent Soul still follows thee, And trusts her Int'rests in thy Hands.
Let Love and Mercy, all divine, Justice, descending from the Skies, Kindness and Truth, my Heart incline, Still to forgive mine Enemies.<20>
Thus may I act the Christian Part, The Social, Human and Divine, Whilst a wise Zeal inspires my Heart; Then shall I know that Heaven is mine.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hymns for the Amusement of Children (1791)/Love of God

HYMN II.
LOVE of GOD.
Great God of Love! — that charming name Should all my powers controul; Should make my best affections flame And kindle all my soul.
Nor I, nor Angels round the throne Can love to what's thy due; Beauties divine to them unknown Pass all they have in view.
When they have stretch'd their wings for flight, The steep ascent to try; <10> Struck with the vast and boundless height, In wonder lost they lie.
Yet they for ever wonder on And gaze with high delight: And love the Infinite unknown, With all their mind and might.
I too would lift mine eyes to see What Angels can't explore, With fix'd attention gaze at Thee, And wonder and adore. <20>
O clear mine eyes, my heart inflame, With love fill up my soul; Let this affection reign supreme, And all my powers controul.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jude the Obscure/Part 2

Part Second
AT CHRISTMINSTER
    "Save his own soul he hath no star."—Swinburne.
    "Notitiam primosque gradus vicinia fecit;
    Tempore crevit
    amor."—Ovid.
* Chapter 1
* Chapter 2
* Chapter 3
* Chapter 4
* Chapter 5
* Chapter 6
* Chapter 7
# Jordan v. Roche

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
228 U.S. 436
Jordan v. Roche
Argued: April 15, 1913. --- Decided: April 28, 1913
Assistant Attorney General Harr for Edward B. Jordan, collector.
Messrs. John David Lannon, Howard T. Walden, and Henry J. Webster for James W. Roche and Ross & Ross.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 437-439 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jordan v. Wiman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 780
Jordan v. Wiman
Jordan, pro se.
MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen. of Alabama, and David W. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jordan v. Massachusetts

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
225 U.S. 167
Jordan v. Massachusetts
Argued: April 16, 1912. --- Decided: May 27, 1912
Messrs. Arthur Thad Smith, Harvey H. Pratt, Jeremiah S. Sullivan, and Charles W. Bartlett for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 167-170 intentionally omitted]
Mr. James M. Swift, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and Mr. Walter A. Powers, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 170-172 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Lurton delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jordan v. Silver

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
381 U.S. 415
Jordan v. Silver
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, Charles E. Corker and Charles A. Barrett, Asst. Attys. Gen., Sanford N. Gruskin, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Herman F. Selvin, for appellants.
Phill Silver, appellee, pro se.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jordan v. Wiman/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 780
Jordan v. Wiman
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jorinda and Jorindel

* related portals: Brothers Grimm.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
English-language translations of Jorinde und Joringel include:
* "Jorinda and Jorindel" (1823), translated by Edgar Taylor and David Jardine, in German Popular Stories
* "Jorinda and Joringel", translated by Margaret Raine Hunt, in Grimm's Household Tales, Volume 1 (1884)
* "Jorinda and Joringel", translated by Alice Lucas, illustrated by Arthur Rackham, in The Fairy Tales of the Brothers Grimm (1909)
* "Jorinda and Jorindel", translated by Edgar Taylor, David Jardine and Marian Edwardes, edited by Marian Edwardes, illustrated by Robert Anning Bell, in Grimm's Household Tales (1912)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re U.S. Truck Co.

* related portals: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
* 800 F.2d 581
* IN RE: U.S. TRUCK COMPANY, INC., a Michigan Corporation, Debtor; TEAMSTERS NATIONAL FREIGHT INDUSTRY NEGOTIATING COMMITTEE, Appellant
* v.
* U.S. TRUCK COMPANY, INC., Appellee
* No. 85-1375
* United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
* July 14, 1986, Argued
* September 4, 1986, Decided
* September 4, 1986, Filed
ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
The District Court's judgment is affirmed.
Gerry M. Miller, Larry R. Steffes, Goldberg, Previant, Uelman, Gratz, Miller and Brueggeman, Kenneth Dau-Schmidt, Argued, for Appellant.
Joseph S. Radom, P.C., Thomas B. Radom, Argued, George Arlen Pack, Marco, Eagan, Kennedy & Timmis, for Appellee.
Kennedy and Milburn, Circuit Judges; and Peck, Senior Circuit Judge.
# In re United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
194 U.S. 194
In re United States
Argued: April 18, 1904. --- Decided: May 2, 1904
Solicitor General Hoyt and Assistant Attorney General McReynolds for petitioner.
Mr. Chief Justice Fuller delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re Tiffany

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
252 U.S. 32
In re Tiffany
Argued: Jan. 19, 1920. --- Decided: March 1, 1920
Mr. Merritt Lane, of Newark, N. J., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from page 32-33 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Samuel Heyman, of Jersey City, N. J., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from page 33-34 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice DAY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re Transportes Maritimos Do Estado

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
264 U.S. 105
In re Transportes Maritimos Do Estado
Argued: on Return to Rule Jan. 7, 8, 1924. --- Decided: Feb 18, 1924
Mr. F. Dudley Kohler, of New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. E. Curtis Rouse, of New York City, for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from page 106 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re Tyson Foods, Inc. Consolidated Shareholder Litigation

* related portals: Delaware case law.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE, NEW CASTLE
919 A.2d 563
IN RE TYSON FOODS, INC. CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION
No. 1106-N Argued: September 20, 2006 --- Decided: February 6, 2007
Stuart M. Grant, Megan D. McIntyre, and Michael J. Barry, of GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; OF COUNSEL: Jeffrey G. Smith and Robert Abrams, of WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZ LLP, New York, New York, Attorneys for Plaintiffs.
A. Gilchrist Sparks, III, S. Mark Hurd, and Samuel T. Hirzel, of MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; OF COUNSEL: David F. Graham, Anne E. Rea, and Julie K. Potter, of SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, Chicago, Illinois, Attorneys for Defendants.
Kurt M. Heyman and Patricia L. Enerio, of PROCTOR HEYMAN LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, Attorneys for Nominal Defendant.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Journal of the Conversations of Lord Byron/Conversations/Section 34

“Bowles is one of the same little order of spirits, who has been fussily fishing on for fame, and is equally waspish and jealous. What could Coleridge mean by praising his poetry as he does?
“It was a mistake of mine, about his making the woods of Madeira tremble, &c.; but it seems that I might ​have told him that there were no woods to make tremble with kisses, which would have been quite as great a blunder.
“I met Bowles once at Rogers’s, and thought him a pleasant, gentlemanly man—a good fellow, for a parson. When men meet together after dinner, the conversation takes a certain turn. I remember he entertained us with some good stories. The reverend gentleman pretended, however, to be much shocked at Pope’s letters to Martha Blount.
“I set him and his invariable principles at rest. He did attempt an answer, which was no reply; at least, nobody read it. I believe he applied to me some lines in Shakspeare. A man is very unlucky who has a name that can be punned upon; and his own did not escape.
“I have been reading ‘Johnson’s Lives,’ a book I am very fond of. I look upon him as the profoundest of ​critics, and had occasion to study him when I was writing to Bowles.
“Of all the disgraces that attach to England in the eye of foreigners, who admire Pope more than any of our poets, (though it is the fashion to under-rate him among ourselves,) the greatest perhaps is, that there should be no place assigned to him in Poets’ Corner. I have often thought of erecting a monument to him at my own expense, in Westminster Abbey; and hope to do so yet. But he was a Catholic, and, what was worse, puzzled Tillotson and the Divines. That accounts for his not having any national monument. Milton, too, had very nearly been without a stone; and the mention of his name on the tomb of another was at one time considered a profanation to a church. The French, I am told, lock up Voltaire’s tomb. Will there never be an end to this bigotry? Will men never learn that every great poet is necessarily a religious man?—so at least Coleridge says.”
“Yes,” replied Shelley; “and he might maintain the converse,—that every truly religious man is a poet; meaning by poetry the power of communicating intense and impassioned impressions respecting man and Nature.”
# Journal of the Conversations of Lord Byron/Errata

ERRATA.
| Page 21, | line | 12, | for | “forming” read “frowning.” |
| 65, | — | 1, | — | “prime,” read “grim.” |
| 91, | — | 6, | — | “Cressida’s passion,” read “Cressida passim.” |
| 99, | — | 20, | — | “Argive,” read “Argine.” |
| 102, | — | 7, | after | “do,” instead of “and was” put “Lewis.” |
| 104, | — | 14, | for | “wag,” read “hag.” |
| 120, | — | 8, | — | “Benyons,” read “Benzons.” |
| 138, | — | 8, | after | “at Lucca,” insert “said Shelley.” |
| | — | 15, | — | “school,” insert “replied Lord Byron.” |
| 139, | — | 12, | for | “recitation,” read “recitative.” |
# Journal of the Conversations of Lord Byron/Conversations/Section 49

“I have a great curiosity about every thing relating to Goëthe, and please myself with thinking there is some analogy between our characters and writings. So much interest do I take in him, that I offered to give 100l. to any person who would translate his ‘Memoirs,’ for my own reading. Shelley has sometimes explained part of them to me. He seems to be very superstitious, and is a believer in astrology,—or rather was, for he was very young when he wrote the first part of his Life. I would give the world to read ‘Faust’ in the original. ​I have been urging Shelley to translate it; but he said that the translator of ‘Wallenstein’ was the only person living who could venture to attempt it;—that he had written to Coleridge, but in vain. For a man to translate it, he must think as he does.”
“How do you explain,” said I, “the first line,—
‘The sun thunders through the sky’?”
“He speaks of the music of the spheres in Heaven,” said he, “where, as in Job, the first scene is laid.”
# Journal of the Conversations of Lord Byron/Conversations/Section 22

“I have just been reading Lamb’s Specimens,” said he, “and am surprised to find in the extracts from the old dramatists so many ideas that I thought exclusively my own. Here is a passage, for instance, from ‘The Duchess of Malfy,’ astonishingly like one in ‘Don Juan.’
​“‘The leprosy of lust’ I discover, too, is not mine. ‘Thou tremblest,’—‘’Tis with age then,’ which I am accused of borrowing from Otway, was taken from the Old Bailey proceedings. Some judge observed to the witness, ‘Thou tremblest;’—‘’Tis with cold then,’ was the reply.
“These Specimens of Lamb’s I never saw till today. I am taxed with being a plagiarist, when I am least conscious of being one; but I am not very scrupulous, I own, when I have a good idea, how I came into possession of it. How can we tell to what extent Shakspeare is indebted to his contemporaries, whose works are now lost? Besides which, Cibber adapted his plays to the stage.
“The invocation of the witches was, we know, a servile plagiarism from Middleton. Authors were not so squeamish about borrowing from one another in those days. If it be a fault, I do not pretend to be immaculate. I will lend you some volumes of Shipwrecks, from which my storm in ‘Don Juan’ came.
“Round her she makes an atmosphere of light; “The very air seemed lighter from her eyes?”
“The Germans,” said he, “and I believe Goëthe himself, consider that I have taken great liberties with ‘Faust.’ All I know of that drama is from a sorry French translation, from an occasional reading or two into English of parts of it by Monk Lewis when at Diodati, and from the Hartz mountain-scene, that Shelley versified from the other day. Nothing I envy him so much as to be able to read that astonishing production in the original. As to originality, Goëthe has too much sense to pretend that he is not under obligations to authors, ancient and modern;—who is not? You tell me the plot is almost entirely Calderon’s. The fête, the scholar, the argument about the Logos, the selling himself to the fiend, and afterwards denying his power; his disguise of the plumed cavalier; the enchanted mirror,—are all from Cyprian. That magico prodigioso must be worth reading, and nobody seems to know any thing about it but you and Shelley. Then the vision is not unlike that of Marlow’s, in his ‘Faustus.’ The bed-scene is from ‘Cymbeline;’ the song or serenade, a translation of Ophelia’s, in ‘Hamlet;’ and, more than all, the prologue is from Job, which is the first drama in the world, and ​perhaps the oldest poem. I had an idea of writing a ‘Job,’ but I found it too sublime. There is no poetry to be compared with it.”
I told him that Japhet’s soliloquy in ‘Heaven and Earth,’ and address to the mountains of Caucasus, strongly resembled Faust’s.
“I shall have commentators enough by and by,” said he, “to dissect my thoughts, and find owners for them.”
# Le Morte d'Arthur/Volume I/Book III

* Chapter I: How King Arthur took a wife, and wedded Guenever, daughter to Leodegrance, King of the Land of Cameliard, with whom he had the Round Table
* Chapter II: How the Knights of the Round Table were ordained and their sieges blessed by the Bishop of Canterbury
* Chapter III: How a poor man, riding upon a lean mare, desired King Arthur to make his son knight
* Chapter IV: How Sir Tor was known for son of King Pellinore, and how Gawaine was made knight
* Chapter V: How at the feast of the wedding of King Arthur to Guenever, a white hart came into the hall, and thirty couple hounds, and how a brachet pinched the hart, which was taken away
* Chapter VI: How Sir Gawaine rode for to fetch again the hart, and how two brethren fought each against other for the hart
* Chapter VII: How the hart was chased into a castle and there slain, and how Sir Galraine slew a lady
* Chapter VIII: How four knights fought against Sir Gawaine and Gaheris, and how they were overcome, and their lives saved at the request of four ladies
* Chapter IX: How Sir Tor rode after the knight with the brachet, and of his adventure by the way
* Chapter X: How Sir Tor found the brachet with a lady, and how a knight assailed him for the said brachet
* Chapter XI: How Sir Tor overcame the knight, and how he lost his head at the request of a lady
* Chapter XII: How King Pellinore rode after the lady and the knight that led her away, and how a lady desired help of him, and how he fought with two knights for that lady, of whom he slew the one at the first stroke
* Chapter XIII: How King Pellinore gat the lady and brought her to Camelot to the court of King Arthur
* Chapter XIV: How on the way he heard two knights, as he lay by night in a valley, and of other adventures
* Chapter XV: How when he was come to Camelot he was sworn upon a book to tell the truth of his quest
# Labor Management Relations Act of 1947

Also known as the Taft-Hartley Act
Note: This is the original legislation as it was initially enacted. Any subsequent amendments hosted on Wikisource may be listed using What Links Here.
An Act To amend the National Labor Relations Act, to provide additional facilities for the mediation of labor disputes affecting commerce, to equalize legal responsibilities of labor organizations and employers, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SHORT TITLE AND DECLARATION OF POLICY
Section 1. (a) This act may be cited as the "Labor Management Relations Act of 1947". (b) Industrial strife which interferes with the normal flow of commerce and with the full production of articles and commodities for commerce, can be avoided or substantially minimized if employers, employees, and labor organizations each recognize under law one another's legitimate rights in their relations with each other, and above all recognize under law that neither party has any right in its relations with any other to engage in acts or practices which jeopardize the public health, safety, or interest. It is the purpose and policy of this Act, in order to promote the full flow of commerce, to prescribe the legitimate rights of both employees and employers in their relations affecting commerce, to provide orderly and peaceful procedures for preventing the interference by either with the legitimate rights of the other, to protect the rights of individual employees in their relations with labor organizations whose activities affect commerce, to define and proscribe practices on the part of labor and management which affect commerce and are inimical to the general welfare, and to protect the rights of the public in connection with labor disputes affecting commerce.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse