OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Letter of Instruction No. 16 (Marcos)

Source: Official Gazette. Vol. 68, No. 41. Office of the President. 1972. pp. 7959–7960.
Layout 2
MALACAÑANG RESIDENCE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINES MANILA
October 1, 1972
LETTER OF INSTRUCTION No. 16
To: The Secretary of Agriculture and Natural Resources The Secretary of National Defense The Provincial Governors, City and Municipal Mayors The Chairman and Members, Price Control Council.
In view of the present national emergency and our desire to reform our society, and following the promulgation of Presidential Decree No. 7, dated October 1, 1972, as a means of arresting increases in the prices of meat, you are all hereby ordered to immediately implement and enforce strictly the provisions of Presidential Decree No. 7 which regulates the orderly marketing of livestock and animal products and establishes stricter control over animal feeds for the benefit of the mass of our people, particularly for consumers and those engaged in the livestock industry.
The Secretary of Agriculture and Natural Resources shall, within 15 days, organize and establish the National Meat Inspection System with its defined functions and procedures as promulgated in this Presidential Decree.
The Secretary of National Defense shall see to the safe, speedy, and economical movement of livestock and animal products through the marketing channels, prevent the interception of vehicles carrying such products by any person for the purpose of committing any form or extortion and harrassment and for forwith arrest and detain such persons under Proclamation No. 1081 dated September 21, 1972.
Provincial Governors and City and Municipal Mayors shall forthwith cease and desist from imposing and collecting any and all fees and charges on the production, slaughter, transport, and marketing of livestock and animal products within their respective jurisdictions, except ante-mortem and post-mortem fees authorized by the Secretary of Agriculture and Natural Resources or by the National Meat Inspection System to be established here after.
The Price Control Council is hereby directed to review the ceiling prices of meats and other animal products in view of the reduced marketing costs arising from the implementation of the aforesaid Presidential Decree with the objective of reducing meat retail prices to consumers to the extent possible. The Council is to approve new price ceilings for such products within 30 days from today.
Done in the City of Manila this 1st day of October in the year of our Lord, nineteen hundred and seventy-two.
(Sgd.) Ferdinand E. Marcos President Republic of the Philippines
This work is in the public domain because it is a work of the Philippine government (see Republic Act No. 8293 Sec. 176).
All official Philippine texts of a legislative, administrative, or judicial nature, or any official translation thereof, are ineligible for copyright.
An additional license tag is required in order to demonstrate why this work is freely licensed or in the public domain in the United States.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Letter of Instruction No. 18 (Marcos)

Source: Official Gazette. Vol. 68, No. 41. Office of the President. 1972. pp. 7961.
Layout 2
MALACAÑANG RESIDENCE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINES MANILA
October 2, 1972
LETTER OF INSTRUCTION No. 18
To: All Department Heads and Heads of Other Offices and Agencies of the Government
It is now necessary that our people be informed properly and adequately about the state of affairs in the country, the objectives of the proclamation of martial law and the conditions hoped to be achieved as a result thereof, and the various endeavors of the Government designed to bring about the New Society.
In view of this, I call upon all heads of departments and of other offices and agencies to help in the current information effort of the Government. Towards this end, they are required to coordinate with the Department of Information, as well as upgrade their own information service and initiate information projects concerning their own departments, offices or agencies in the context of our present reform effort.
(Sgd.) Ferdinand E. Marcos President Republic of the Philippines
This work is in the public domain because it is a work of the Philippine government (see Republic Act No. 8293 Sec. 176).
All official Philippine texts of a legislative, administrative, or judicial nature, or any official translation thereof, are ineligible for copyright.
An additional license tag is required in order to demonstrate why this work is freely licensed or in the public domain in the United States.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Letter of Instruction No. 20 (Marcos)

Source: Official Gazette. Vol. 68, No. 41. Office of the President. 1972. pp. 7963.
Layout 2
MALACAÑANG RESIDENCE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINES MANILA
Manila, October 2, 1972
LETTER OF INSTRUCTION No. 20
| To: | The Secretary of Public Works and Communications The Commissioner of Public Highways The Postmaster General The Commissioner of Land Transporation The Director of Telecommunications The Acting Chief of Radio Regulations, Radio Control Office The Director, Civil Aeronautics Administration The Officer-in-Charge, Irrigation Service Unit |
In order to facilitate the implementation of the program of reforms of the Government, and in relation to your letters of indorsements dated September 27, 28 and 29, 1972, recommending disciplinary action against certain officials and employees, who are either facing charges or are notoriously undesirable, in the different offices under the Department of Public Works and Communications, you are hereby directed to take the following actions:
1. Dismiss immediately all officials and employees recomended for dismissal, including those whose services can be dispensed with, as contained in your reports which are attached as integral parts of this Order, except as herein otherwise indicated, to wit:
2. Considered as resigned the officials and employees enumerated in your reports.
3. Suspend for one year the officials and employees included in your reports.
Your immediate compliance with this Order is enjoined.
(Sgd.) Ferdinand E. Marcos President Republic of the Philippines
This work is in the public domain because it is a work of the Philippine government (see Republic Act No. 8293 Sec. 176).
All official Philippine texts of a legislative, administrative, or judicial nature, or any official translation thereof, are ineligible for copyright.
An additional license tag is required in order to demonstrate why this work is freely licensed or in the public domain in the United States.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Letter of Instruction No. 17 (Marcos)

Source: Official Gazette. Vol. 68, No. 41. Office of the President. 1972. pp. 7960–7961.
Layout 2
MALACAÑANG RESIDENCE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINES MANILA
October 1, 1972
LETTER OF INSTRUCTION No. 17
To: The Secretary of Finance Attn: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue
With the end in view of encouraging investment or deposit of incomes, the productivity of all forms of property as well as the voluntary disclosure of concealed cash, funds (in any currency) securities, personal, real and other forms of property as income, a grace period is hereby given to all persons who now voluntarily disclose their undeclared incomes as described above, located here or abroad.
Provided that these persons, natural or juridical, disclose or declare, deposit or invest these cash or funds between today and December 31, 1972, they will be exempt from —
(1) Any investigations or inquires into the source of these incomes;
(2) Any penalties that may have arisen on account of their failure to declare these incomes in accordance with law.
Furthermore, the proper income taxes accruing and payable from these incomes should be paid.
If they are concealed property other than cash and funds or securities, they must be put into productive enterprises before March 31, 1973, to come within the grace period herein.
Done in the City of Manila, this 1st day of October, in the year of our Lord, nineteen hundred and seventy-two.
(Sgd.) Ferdinand E. Marcos President Republic of the Philippines
This work is in the public domain because it is a work of the Philippine government (see Republic Act No. 8293 Sec. 176).
All official Philippine texts of a legislative, administrative, or judicial nature, or any official translation thereof, are ineligible for copyright.
An additional license tag is required in order to demonstrate why this work is freely licensed or in the public domain in the United States.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Klopfer v. North Carolina

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinions

    Stewart
    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
386 U.S. 213
Klopfer v. North Carolina
Argued: Dec. 8, 1966. --- Decided: March 13, 1967
Wade H. Penny, Jr., Durham, N.C., for petitioner.
Andrew A. Vanore, Jr., Raleigh, N.C., for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Klopfer v. North Carolina/Concurrence Harlan

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Stewart Harlan
United States Supreme Court
386 U.S. 213
Klopfer v. North Carolina
Argued: Dec. 8, 1966. --- Decided: March 13, 1967
Mr. Justice HARLAN, concurring in the result.
While I entirely agree with the result reached by the Court, I am unable to subscribe to the constitutional premises upon which that result is based-quite evidently the viewpoint that the Fourteenth Amendment 'incorporates' or 'absorbs' as such all or some of the specific provisions of the Bill of Rights. I do not believe that this is sound constitutional doctrine. See my opinion concurring in the result in Pointer v. State of Texas, 380 U.S. 400, 408, 85 S.Ct. 1065, 1070, 13 L.Ed.2d 923.
I would rest decision of this case not on the 'speedy trial' provision of the Sixth Amendment, but on the ground that this unusual North Carolina procedure, which in effect allows state prosecuting officials to put a person under the cloud of an unliquidated criminal charge for an indeterminate period, violates the requirement of fundamental fairness assured by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. To support that conclusion I need only refer to the traditional concepts of due process set forth in the opinion of THE CHIEF JUSTICE.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Klockius

Klockius so deeply hath sworne, ne'r more to come
In bawdie house, that hee dares not goe home.
1. Klockius (untitled in 1633, thus titled in MSS). The name may derive from the Dutch kloek, a sky person.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kloeb v. Armour & Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
311 U.S. 199
Kloeb v. Armour & Company
Argued: on Briefs Nov. 18, 1940. --- Decided: Dec 9, 1940
Messrs. Percy R. Taylor and Nolan Boggs, both of Toledo, Ohio, for petitioner.
Messrs. Edward W. Kelsey, Jr., and Fred A. Smith, both of Toledo, Ohio, and Charles J. Faulkner, Jr., of Chicago, Ill., for respondent.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Klopfer v. North Carolina/Concurrence Stewart

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Stewart Harlan
United States Supreme Court
386 U.S. 213
Klopfer v. North Carolina
Argued: Dec. 8, 1966. --- Decided: March 13, 1967
Mr. Justice STEWART concurs in the result.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Letters of Junius/Letter XLVII

LETTER XLVII.
TO THE PRINTER OF THE PUBLIC ADVERTISER.
25. May. 1771.
    SIR,
I CONFESS my partiality to Junius, and feel a considerable pleasure in being able to communicate any thing to the public in support of his opinions. The doctrine laid down in his last letter, concerning the power of the house of commons to commit for contempt, is not so new as it appeared to many people; who dazzled with the name of privilege, had never suffered themselves to examine the question fairly. In the course of my reading this morning, I met with the following passage in the Journals of the house of commons. (Vol. 1st. page 603.) Upon ​occasion of a jurisdiction unlawfully assumed by the house in the year 1621, Mr. Attorney-general Noye gave his opinion as follows: "No doubt but in some cases, this house may give judgment, in matters of returns, and concerning members of our house, or falling out in our view in parliament; but, for foreign matters, knoweth not how we can judge it; knoweth not that we have been used to give judgment in any case, but those before mentioned."
Sir Edward Coke, upon the same subject, says, (page 604) "No question but this is a house of record, and that it hath power of judicature in some cases ; have power to judge of returns and members of our house. One, no member, offending out of the parliament, when he came hither, and justified it, was censured for it."
Now, Sir, if you will compare the opinion of these great sages of the law with Junius's doctrine, you will find they tally exactly.—He allows the power of the house to commit their own members; (which, however, they may grossly abuse.) he allows their power in cases where they are acting as a court of ​judicature, viz. elections, returns, &c.—and he allows it in such contempts as immediately interrupt their proceedings, or, as Mr. Noye expresses it, falling out in their view in parliament.
They who would carry the privileges of parliament farther than Junius, either do not mean well to the public, or know not what they are doing. The government of England is a government of law. We betray ourselves, we contradict the spirit of our laws, and we shake the whole system of English jurisprudence, whenever we entrust a discretionary power over the life, liberty, or fortune of the subject, to any man, or set of men, whatsoever, upon a presumption that it will not be abused.
PHILO JUNIUS.
# Letters of Junius/Letter XLV

LETTER XLV.
TO THE PRINTER OF THE PUBLIC ADVERTISER.
1. May, 1771.
    SIR
THET who object to detached parts of Junius's last letter, either do not mean him fairly, or have not considered the general scope and course of his argument.—There are degrees in all the private vices;—why not in public prostitution?—The influence of the crown naturally makes a septennial parliament dependent. Does it follow, that every house of commons will plunge at once into the lowest depths of prostitution?—Junius supposes, that the present house of commons, in going such enormous lengths, ​have been imprudent to themselves, as well as wicked to the public;—that their example is not within the reach of emulation;—and that, in the first session after the next election, some popular measures may probably be adopted. He does not expect that a dissolution of parliament will destroy corruption, but that, at least, it will be a check and terror to their successors, who will have seen, that, in flagrant cases, their constituents can and will interpose with effect.—After all, sir, will you not endeavour to remove or alleviate the most dangerous symptoms, because you cannot eradicate the disease? Will you not punish treason or parricide, because the sight of a gibbet does not prevent high-way robberies? When the main argument of Junius is admitted to be unanswerable, I think it would become the minor critic, who hunts for blemishes, to be little more distrustful of his own sagacity.—The other objection is hardly worth an answer. When Junius observes, that kings are ready enough to follow such advice, he does not mean to insinuate, that, if the advice of parliament were good, the king would be so ready to follow it.
PHILO JUNIUS.
# Latin Prayers not Fit for Irishmen/Instinct of Birds

INSTINCT OF BIRDS.
When the Lapwing wants to procure food, it seeks for a worm's cast, and stamps the ground by the side of ​it with his feet; somewhat in the manner we have often done when a boy, in order to procure worms for fishing. After doing this for a short time, the bird waits for the issue of the worm from the hole, who, alarmed at the shaking of the ground, endeavours to make its escape, when he is immediately seized, and becomes the prey of this ingenious bird. The lapwing also frequents the haunts of moles. These animals, when in pursuit of worms on which they feed, frighten them, and the worm in attempting to escape, comes to the surface of the ground where they are seized by the lapwing. The same mode of alarming his prey has been related of the gull.
FINIS.
# Latin Prayers not Fit for Irishmen/Margaret and the Minister

MARGARET
AND THE MINISTER.
# Latimer v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
223 U.S. 501
Latimer v. United States
Argued: January 15, 1912. --- Decided: February 19, 1912
Messrs. Walter F. Welch and Edward S. Hatch for appellant.
[Argument from pages 501-503 intentionally omitted]
Assistant Attorney General Wemple for appellee.
Mr. Justice Lamar delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Latin Prayers not Fit for Irishmen

LATIN PRAYERS
NOT FIT FOR IRISHMEN.
TO WHICH ARE ADDED
MARGARET
AND
THE MINISTER;
AND
SODA WATER.
PRINTED FOR THE BOOKSELLERS.
* Latin Prayers not Fit for Irishmen
* Margaret and the Minister
* Soda Water
* Instinct of Birds
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Latin Prayers not Fit for Irishmen/Soda Water

SODA WATER.
# Lathrop v. Judson/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
60 U.S. 66
Lathrop v. Judson
This is a writ of error to the Circuit Court for the eastern district of Louisiana.
The action was brought on a judgment rendered by the Supreme Court of Louisiana; certain matters were set up in the Circuit Court, as a defence, all of which were overruled, and judgment was entered for eighteen hundred and ten dollars, with interest and costs. The only errors assigned in this court, on which a reversal of the judgment of the Circuit Court is prayed, are: 1, that at the time suit was brought on the judgment, in the Circuit Court, an execution had been issued on the same judgment in the State court, which was in full force, and on which a seizure had been made; and 2, that the Circuit Court erred in holding that the indebtment was not founded on a Louisiana contract.
These exceptions were not taken in the progress of the trial in the Circuit Court, and do not appear on the record. The fact that an execution was issued and returned appears in the record of the State court, but it was not made a part of the record of the Circuit Court, by bill of exceptions, and it cannot now be noticed. There is no ground of error on the face of the record, for the action of this court. The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed with ten per cent. damages.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 173/Issue 2242/Two Poets

Originally published in Cornhill Magazine.
He sat upon a pinnacle alone,  Musing on lofty thoughts that search and climb,  And pierce the inner secresy of Time. Above his head the keen stars burned and shone; Beneath, the dark and shuddering pines made moan.  He caught an echo of celestial rhyme,  Ineffable, unspeakable, sublime, And there supreme, serene upon his throne, Rapt visions circled him, dim prophecies,  Vague ultimate glories, while the blue mists curled  Over a meaner, sadder, happier world; The blazing scroll of awful mysteries  Unrolled before his kindling eyes. He trod  Apart the mountain peak and sang to God.
The other paced incessant to and fro The crowded lanes of cities, where the light  Of obscure firesides streamed into the night; Babble of childish laughter, humble woe, The common troubles that the common know,  The din of homely labor and the sight  Of homely pleasures, struggles wrong or right Unheard, unheeded, narrow lives and low, He stooped and wove them garlands for his art;  Transfigured by the magic of his song  The simple joys and sorrows of the throng; Laid his great heart upon the people's heart;  Garnered a harvest of the scattered sheaves.  And then  Careless of deeper things he sang to men.
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 173/Issue 2243/Boast Not of To-morrow

Originally published in Chambers' Journal.
The lark said: “Lot the winter has gone by;  Buds will be bursting; I shall greet the spring;
The snow has vanished, and bright days are nigh;  I soar into the blue, my song to sing.” But ere he plumed his wings for happy flight, Deep snow came down, and veiled the fields in white.
The floweret said: “In this warm, sheltered nook,  My blossom I will spread before the sun, And he will smile on me with gladsome look.”  But the dear floweret, ere the day was done, Shrivelled before the north wind’s frosty breath, Trembled, and closed her bright-blue eyes in death.
The maiden said: “My true love is away;  But soon his ship will come across the foam, And life will then be lovely, bright, and gay,  And blessed days will gladden our fair home.” But as she, dreamt her happy dreams and smiled, His barque went down at midnight dark and wild.
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 173/Issue 2243/Moradabad and the Jubilee

Originally published in Allahabad Pioneer.
Moradabad and the Jubilee — The people of Moradabad have determined on commemorating the jubilee of the queen-empress in a thoroughly practical and useful form — one in consonance with the noble movement now on foot for the amelioration of the sufferings of India’s women. At a cost of some twenty thousand rupees, contributed partly by private subscriptions and partly by municipal donations, the Jubilee Hospital for Females is to be erected on a suitable plot of ground, acquired for that purpose near to the Civil Hospital. The building is to be of a novel and picturesque design, and will contain eight special wards for purda-nashin women, besides accommodation for sixteen other female patients, quarters for female doctor, dispensing and store rooms. Mr. Spedding, the magistrate of Moradabad, is working hard to secure the buildings being constructed at the earliest possible date. “When this is done” — to use the words of Dr. Walker, inspector-general of civil hospitals — “and the female hospital is placed under the charge of a trained female practitioner, the Moradabad Hospital will be in advance of any other in these provinces.” In connection with the above movement, we may mention that Moradabad will have the honor of heading the list of jubilee card collections, the applications for cards having been first received from this district. A sum of over eight thousand rupees has already been collected on these cards, chiefly in small sums. If other districts will only follow the example of Moradabad, the success of the Dufferin Fund will be assured.