OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# L. 1937 c. 18252 (Florida)

* information about this edition.
* related portals: Florida.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
CHAPTER 18252--(No. 546).
HOUSE BILL NO. 1258
AN ACT to Declare, Designate and Establish a Certain State Road, in Hillsborough County, Florida.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
Section 1. That the following named and designated road be and the same is hereby declared, designated and established as a State Road, forming a part of the connecting system of the State Roads of the State of Florida
That certain road described as:
Beginning at the intersection of West Shore Boulevard and Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Right-of-Way in Port Tampa City, Florida, and extending Southerly and Easterly along West Shore Boulevard and by the most practical route to the United States Quarantine Station at Gadsden Point, Hillsborough County, Florida.
Section 2. That this road shall be appropriately numbered by the State Road Department of Florida, and shall be entitled to receive all rights and privileges of the other designated State Roads.
Section 3. All laws and parts of laws in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 4. This Act shall become a law upon its approval by the Governor or upon its becoming a law without such approval.
Approved by the Governor May 31, 1937.
Filed in Office Secretary of State June 1, 1937.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# L. 1937 c. 18263 (Florida)

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
CHAPTER 18263--(No. 557).
HOUSE BILL NO. 1602
AN ACT to Redesignate and Reestablish State Road No. 28 and to Repeal Chapter 12373, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1927 and Chapter 13854, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1929.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
Section 1. That State Road No. 28 be and the same is hereby redesignated and reestablished to extend from Lake City to Flagler Beach, via Lulu, Lake Butler, Starke, Keystone Heights, Palatka and Bunnell.
Section 2. That Chapter 12373, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1927, and Chapter 13854, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1929 be and the same are hereby repealed.
Section 3. All laws and parts of laws in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 4. This Act shall take effect immediately upon becoming a Law.
Became a law without the Governor's approval.
Filed in Office Secretary of State June 14, 1937.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Interrogation

first published in WEIRD TALES, VOL 10, Issue 3 - September 1927
Love, will you look with me Upon the phosphor-litten labor of the worm— Time's minister, who toils for his appointed term, And has for fee All superannuate loves, and all the loves to be?
Love, can you see, as I, The corpses, ghosts and demons mingled with the crowd? The djinns that men have freed, grown turbulent and proud? Alastor, Asmodai? And all-unheeded envoys from the stars on high?
Know you the gulfs below, Where darkling Erebus on Erebus is driven Between the molecules—atom from atom riven, And tossing to and fro, Incessant, like the souls on Dante's wind of woe?
Know you the deeps above? The terror and vertigo of those who gaze too long Upon the crystal skies unclouded? Are you strong With me to prove Even in thought or dream the dreadful pits above?
Know you the gulfs within? The larvae, the minotaurs of labyrinths undared? The somber foam of seas by cryptic sirens shared? The pestilence and sin Borne by the flapping shroud of liches met within?
# Interstate Amusement Company v. Albert

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
239 U.S. 560
Interstate Amusement Company v. Albert
Argued: November 10, 1915. --- Decided: January 10, 1916
Messrs. G. H. West, W. E. Drummond, and W. B. Miller for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 561-562 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Joe V. Williams, F. M. Thompson, and Neal L. Thompson for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice Pitney delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Jones (276 U.S. 303)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
276 U.S. 303
Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Jones (276 U.S. 303)
Argued: March 8, 1928. --- Decided: March 19, 1928
This is an action under the Employers' Liability Act (45 USCA §§ 51-58; Comp. St. § 8657 et seq.) for the death of one R. D. Ferguson who was a car inspector on the petitioner's road. No one saw the death but the body was found between the main track and a parallel track, and the probability is that Ferguson was killed by a train going north on the former. A freight train was being made up on the parallel track, and the hypothesis of the respondent, supported by little if anything except the place where the body and the lantern of the deceased were found, is that Ferguson was engaged in inspecting the cars, and so absorbed in his work that he did not hear the approaching train but was relying upon the ringing of the engine bell, which usually was rung but which the respondent's witnesses say was not rung on this occasion. The court below sustained the verdict on this ground. Ferguson was seen not later than a quarter before seven in the evening, so far as time can be fixed. The train passed at five minutes after seven, the time at which it was known by him to be due. His body was found at twenty-five minutes after seven. He was an experienced man. The indications are that there was nothing for him to inspect at the probable time of his death. At best it is a mere guess that he was so engaged, still more that he was absorbed in such work. The main track was straight and the train was making a great noise and showing a bright light as it approached. Nothing except imagination and sympathy warranted a finding that the death was due to the negligence of the petitioner rather than to that of the man himself. It is unnecessary to consider whether if the case for the plaintiff were stronger the principle of Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Nixon, 271 U.S. 218, 463 S.C.t. 495, 70 L. Ed. 914, would apply.
Judgment reversed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Road Improvement District No. 3

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
266 U.S. 379
Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Road Improvement District No. 3
Argued: and Submitted May 1, 1924. ---
Messrs. Samuel W. Moore, of New York City, James B. McDonough, of Ft. Smith, Ark., and F. H. Moore and A. F. Smith, both of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Hal L. Norwood, of Mena, Ark., for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Leslie

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
238 U.S. 599
Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Leslie
Argued: April 22, 1915. --- Decided: June 21, 1915
Messrs. James B. McDonough, Frank H. Moore, and Samuel W. Moore for plaintiff in error.
Mr. W. P. Feazel for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 600 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McReynolds delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Kaw Valley Drainage District of Wyandotte County Kansas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
233 U.S. 75
Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Kaw Valley Drainage District of Wyandotte County Kansas
Argued: March 19 and 20, 1914. --- Decided: April 6, 1914
Messrs. Samuel W. Moore, Samuel W. Sawyer, and James M. Souby for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Thomas A. Pollock for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Road Improvement District No. 6

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
256 U.S. 658
Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Road Improvement District No. 6
Argued: March 16 and 17, 1921. --- Decided: June 6, 1921
Messrs. Samuel W. Moore, of New York City, and James B. McDonough, of Ft. Smith, Ark., for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. John J. Du Laney, of Ashdown, Ark., and William H. Arnold, of Texarkana, Ark., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. United States (231 U.S. 423)
* Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. United States (252 U.S. 147)
* Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. United States (282 U.S. 760)
# John Pickard - Thomas Eakins correspondence

John Pickard was an art history professor at the University of Missouri. In 1907, in preparation for a course he was going to teach about American Art history, he wrote letters to several prominent American artists requesting information on their work. This is the letter sent to Thomas Eakins, and Eakins's reply.
June 20, 1907
Dear Sir: In the preparation of a course of lecture on the History of American painting to be delivered next year to the Students of the University of Missouri, I am EXCEEDINGLY desirous of obtaining ACCURATE information concerning the life, artistic development, and work of the painters I am to discuss.
Will you be so very kind as to assist me by giving me the information concerning yourself or by referring me to any publications where the facts are accurately published.
You will confer an additional favor if you will give me a list of your most representative paintings and tell me where I can procure reproductions, either photographs or lantern slides, of your paintings.
Trusting that you may be able to favor me at your early convenience,
Very sincerely yours,
John Pickard
My Dear Sir,
I think probably the St. Louis catalogue would have a list of my principal pictures as I exhibited there at the International Fair the best of my pictures available. I was a pupil of Gérôme. On return to my native city Philadelphia I made many pictures and taught Art and Art History in Philadelphia, New York, Brooklyn & Washington[.] I received honors at Chicago, Buffalo, Paris, St. Louis. Proctor Prize N.A.D. Temple Gold Medal Penns[ylvania] Acad[emy of] Fine Arts, Carnegie Institute. My pictures have hardly ever been photographed except by newspaper men when they have received medals, and I do not know where there are any.
Clinic of Prof. Gross " " Prof Agnew.
Crucifixion The Writing Master The Cello Player Dr Forbes The call of the rolls The rest (Prize Fighting) Dextra vitrici conclamantes salutat (Prize Fighting)
Concert Singer The Collector Bathers
Cardinal Martinelli Cardinal Falconio Archbishop Elder Father Fedigan (Provincial of Augustinians) Monsignor Loughlin Monsignor Turner Mending the net
Sculpture 2 Reliefs on Trenton Battle monument 2 Horses on Brooklyn Soldiers & Sailors monument
Thomas Eakins
# John McMahan Letter 1828-12-02

Source: Handwritten original in the private collection of the Chambless family. Transcribed to softcopy by Susan D. Chambless, 1998.
Courtland Ala. December 2d. 1828
Dear Branston
You have doubtless ere this time give out of ever hearing from me again, but you shall be mistaken although I have not written to you believe me you were not forgotten, and I have been writing to you every day since my arrival in this place. you must excuse me for my negligence when I tell you that I have been very closely engaged ever since I reached here, taking an a/c of stock which you know is a very pleasant business shortly after which we recd our Goods which kept us very busy both day and night, Sunday too. you have no Idea of the number of pretty Girls that Flock to see us daily all of which buy more or Less – were you here I am confident you would once more loose that Heart which is so prone to go astray and should you succeed you might then give up the Yard Stick Bar &c to pursue amore pleasing occupation, you know what I mean, while I am on the subject of the ladies I must tell you of Miss Jane Patton of Huntsville who is one of the Handsomest Girls I have seen since I left Virginia. had not my broken heart led me back to Old Monroe I should certainly have fallen in Love with her. I spent the evening at her Fathers who is the partner of Col Bierne. I thought she smiled on me (vain man) and promised to call again which I shall certainly do.
I am tolerably well pleased with this Country some parts of it is the finest Land I ever saw – but to take it generally I think we have as good Land as there is in this Country. one thing I am certain that we can live more comfortably and as to health there is no comparison which is the Greatest gift of God. there is a good many Goods sold here. our last months sales amounts to $5628 – 99 – which is nothing to what was done a few years ago. still we do not calculate to average more than $3000 a month.
It is quite uncertain what time I shall leave here, my expectation is to get away in June whether I get the business settled [or] not, which I can do nothing on un[ til] Col Beirne arrives to make advise or or sell out.
Swoope is well & trying to get the wife he sends his respects to you
Give my respects to your Father & family together with all my acquaintances. Write soon
Your Friend John J McMahon
This is written in a great hurry which you can see from the style
# John McMahan Letter 1839-03-06

Source: Handwritten original in the private collection of the Chambless family. Transcribed to softcopy by Susan D. Chambless,1999.
Envelope:
Mr Joseph Fawcett, Post Master, St. Charles, Missouri
Contents:
Courtland March 6/39
Mr Jos. Fawcett
D. Sir
Mother, Charles & Margaret came up from Gainesville about two weeks since, they left all well. Willis & Susy had gone to Housekeeping, they live in a small House not far from Elizabeth’s. Willis thinks there is no person in the world equal to Sucky Stabler as he calls her, furnished their Cabin – Elizabeth & her son would have come up but for the situation of Mrs. Scott. she expects to be confined this month & next month the Col will be tried. I have recd two or three Letters from him lately. he writes as though his mind was perfectly at ease – poor unfortunate Man – can I ever forget the looks of his poor Wife & Elizabeth – no – never.
I have not heard whether there has been any more young Fawcetts since you left Virginia, has Willis told you there might be an addition to the name in Alabama – I cannot say at what time – Harriet had a fine son born on the 22d Feb – we have named him William after my Father – could you all be here now it would remind you of by gone days, to see two Families as large as ours would almost make you think you were in old Rock Town, but if you have no more Love for the place than I have, will never wish yourself there again – Mother, Chas & Margt. left this morning on a visit to Uncle Chas Patton who lives about 60 Miles from this place, after their return they will start to Gainesville. I expect to go there in July. I will then bring Elizabeth & Bobby home with me. I wish you could see your Grand Son, he is such a fine Child. I know you would dote on him.
I purchased out a first rate stock of Goods since Jany, about $16.000. at 12 ½ prct. on the original cost. 1/2/ payl Jany 1/40 & the other ½ July 1/40 in paper without Interest. the Goods suited us exactly – this reduced the number to two Stores in our Town – this everlasting credit ruins everything. the Boys at Gainesville profess to do a Cash business, but they don’t stick up to it. I wish you would admonish them when you write – the Boys here are all well – Aunt Betsy requests to be remembered to you all – Give my Love to Mrs. F & the family.
Your Friend
Jno J. McMahon
It strikes me that Asbury McWilliams is in yr debt if so he is well off
# John Nelson Company v. Helvering

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
296 U.S. 374
John Nelson Company v. Helvering
Argued: Nov. 19, 20, 1935. --- Decided: Dec 16, 1935
Mr. J. S. Seidman, of New York City, for petitioner.
The Attorney General and Mr. J. Louis Monarch, of Washington, D.C., for respondents.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# John Powers v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
223 U.S. 303
John Powers v. United States
Argued: January 22, 1912. --- Decided: February 19, 1912
Messrs. S. H. Sutherland and R. A. Ayers for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 304-306 intentionally omitted]
Assistant Attorney General Denison and Mr. Loring C. Christie for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 306-310 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# King v. Consolidated Underwriters/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
361 U.S. 198
King v. Consolidated Underwriters
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# King v. Cornell

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
106 U.S. 395
King v. Cornell
Wm. M. Evarts, C. F. Southmayd, and Jos. H. Choate, for appellant.
Samuel H. Wilcox, for appellees.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# King v. Amy Silversmith Consolidated Mining Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
152 U.S. 222
King v. Amy Silversmith Consolidated Mining Company
Walter H. Smith and C. H. Holcomb, for plaintiff.
W. W. Dixon, for defendant.
Mr. Justice FIELD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# King v. Consolidated Underwriters

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
361 U.S. 198
King v. Consolidated Underwriters
Mr. Richard E. McDaniel, for appellant.
Mr. Fred Hull, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Laird v. Nelms
## Dissenting Opinion

    Stewart
Supreme Court of the United States
406 U.S. 797
Laird, Secretary of Defense, et al. v. Nelms et al.
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
No. 71-573. Argued: April 17, 1972 --- Decided: June 7, 1972
Damage from sonic boom caused by military planes, where no negligence was shown either in the planning or operation of the flight, is not actionable under the Federal Tort Claims Act, which does not authorize suit against the Government on claims based on strict or absolute liability for ultrahazardous liability. Dalehite v. United States, 346 U.S. 15. Pp. 798-803.
442 F. 2d 1163, reversed.
REHNQUIST, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C. J., and WHITE, MARSHALL, BLACKMUN, and POWELL, JJ., joined. STEWART, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which BRENNAN, J., joined, post, p. 803. DOUGLAS, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Richard B. Stone argued the cause for petitioners. On the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Gray, Wm. Terry Bray, Alan S. Rosenthal, and Robert E. Kopp.
George E. Allen, Sr., argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.