OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Men-at-the-Bar/Radcliffe, Francis Reynolds Yonge

​Radcliffe, Francis Reynolds Yonge, M.A. Oxon, late fellow All Souls' Coll. (formerly Corpus Christi Coll.), 1st class classics 1874, an Etonian, a member of the Western circuit, author of The New Politicus, a student of the Inner Temple 28 Jan., 1871 (then aged 19), called to the bar 28 June, 1876 (eldest son of John Alexander Radcliffe, of London, solicitor); born 20 Sept., 1851; married 18 Aug., 1881, Helen, only dau. of Edward Harbord Lushington, Esq., of Brackenhurst, Cobham, Surrey, late financial secretary to Government of India (see Foster's Our Noble and Gentle Families).
    12, Somers Place, Hyde Park, W.; 5, Hare Court, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Radcliffe, Pollexden Colmore Copleston

​Radcliffe, Pollexden Colmore Copleston, a student of the Inner Temple 29 Jan., 1876 (then aged 20), called to the bar 18 Nov., 1878 (eldest son of late Copleston Lopes Radcliffe, of Derriford, near Plymouth, solicitor, dec.); born 30 May, 1855.
    Derriford, Plymouth; 5, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Quilter, Harry

​Quilter, Harry, M.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1877, 3 student of the Inner Temple 3 May, 1872 (then aged 21), called to the bar 18 Nov., 1878 (3rd son of William Quilter, of London, accountant); born , 1851.
    Tite Street, Chelsea Embankment, S.W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Radcliffe, Richard Duncan

​Radcliffe, Richard Duncan, B.A., Christ Church, Oxon, 1868, a member of the Northern circuit, a student of the Middle Temple 28 Jan., 1865, called to the bar 18 Nov., 1872 (eldest son of Richard Radcliffe, of West Derby, co. Lanc., gent.); born , .
    Stoneycroft, West Derby, co. Lanc.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Radcliffe, William

​Radcliffe, William, matric. Balliol Coll., Oxon, a student of the Inner Temple 23 Nov., 1878 (then aged 22), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1882 (eldest son of Rev. John Radcliffe, of Kingston, Jamaica); born , 1856.
    5a, Pall Mall East, S.W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Radford, Ernest

​Radford, Ernest, B.A., Pembroke Coll., Camb., 1876, a student of Lincoln's Inn 17 Nov., 1874 (then aged 21), called to the bar 18 Nov., 1878 (2nd son of Richard Radford, of Manchester, solicitor); born , 1853.
    60, King Street, Manchester; 2, South Square, Gray's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Quicke, Arthur Philip

​Quicke, Arthur Philip, M.A. Hertford Coll., Oxon, B.A. 1880, a student of the Middle Temple 25 Jan., 1881, called to the bar 17 Nov., 1884 (3rd son of Dr. Thomas Royle Quicke, of Brixton, Surrey); born , .
    Brixton Oval.
# Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Company v. Alexander/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
239 U.S. 635
Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Company v. Alexander
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnp. Co. v. Norfolk & O. V. R. Co. 228 U.S. 596, 600, 57 L. ed. 982, 983, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 609; Manhattan L. Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U.S. 123, 137, 58 L. ed. 1245, 1254, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 874; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U.S. 380, 59 L. ed. 279, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 133; (2) Missouri P. R. Co. v. Humes, 115 U.S. 512, 29 L. ed. 463, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 110; Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Beckwith, 129 U.S. 26, 32 L. ed. 585, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 207; Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co. v. Emmons, 149 U.S. 364, 37 L. ed. 769, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 870; (3) Waters-Pierce Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U.S. 112, 118, 53 L. ed. 431, 434, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 227; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co. 226 U.S. 102, 57 L. ed. 140, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 80; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U.S. 31, 59 L. ed. 112, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 14.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company v. Popplar

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
237 U.S. 369
Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company v. Popplar
Argued: and submitted April 14, 1915. --- Decided: April 26, 1915
Messrs. M. D. Munn, A. H. Bright, and J. L. Erdall for plaintiff in error.
Mr Samuel A. Anderson for defendant in error.
Memorandum opinion by direction of the court, by Mr. Justice Hughes:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company v. Moquin

United States Supreme Court
283 U.S. 520
Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company v. Moquin
Argued: April 29, 1931. --- Decided: May 18, 1931
Messrs. Henry S. Mitchell and John E. Palmer, both of Minneapolis, Minn., for petitioner.
Mr. Tom Davis, of Minneapolis, Minn., for respondent.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste Marie Railway Company v. Doughty

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
208 U.S. 251
Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste Marie Railway Company v. Doughty
Argued: December 17, 1907. --- Decided: February 3, 1908
Mr. Alfred H. Bright for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 251-253 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. S. E. Ellsworth and George W. Soliday for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Minneapolis & St. Louis Company v. Peoria & Perkin Union Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
270 U.S. 580
Minneapolis & St. Louis Company v. Peoria & Perkin Union Railway Company
Argued: March 17, 1926. --- Decided: April 12, 1926
Messrs. Donald Evans, of Des Moines, Iowa, and M. M. Joyce, of Minneapolis, Minn., for appellants.
Mr. Eugene E. Horton, of Peoria, Ill., for appellee.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Monsieur Bossu's Treatise of the Epick Poem/Dedication

To the Honoured
RICHARD BLACKMORE,
DOCTOR of PHYSICK,
AND
FELLOW of the College of Physicians in LONDON.
SIR,
The ensuing Treatise, since it has learned to speak English, seems, by a peculiar kind of Title, to lay a more especial Claim to your Patronage, than to any others. For though the Translator be a perfect Stranger to you, yet the Author, which he has ventur'd to translate, is well known by all to be one you are intimately acquainted with: witness your excellent Prince Arthur, wherein you have in a great measure confin'd your self to the Rules and Precepts which Aristotle and Horace, and even our Bossu, have prescrib'd to the Epick Poem.
'Tis upon this Account, Sir, that I presume to cast this Translation under your Protection; not questioning but, as the good-natur'd Critick is always the Poet's Friend; so now, vice versâ, the generous Poet will stand the Criticks Friend, and ​suffer his impartial Reflexions to appear in the English World under the Patronage of so great a Name.
I might here run out into high and just Encomiums upon your late extraordinary Performance; but there is no need for it, since the Work loudly speaks forth its own Praises: and I should rather seem unjust in saying too little, than be thought guilty of Flattery for saying too much in its Commendation.
I have, Sir, in the Preface, ventur'd to make some few Reflexions on your Poem, and hope you have Candour enough to excuse the Freedom I have taken therein. If I have offended, or committed any Mistake, I here declare my self willing and ready to retract upon due Conviction; and shall be always forward to submit my self to the Sentence of better Judgments.
All I have more to say, is, to beg Pardon for my Presumption, in desiring to prefix your Name before my weak Performance; which Favour I hope you will grant to,
Honoured Sir,
Your very Oblig'd and Humble Servant,
(though unknown)
W. J.
Layout 2
# Monsieur de Chauvelin's Will

First published in French in 1850. This translation first published in "Tales of Strange Adventure", 1907.

## Contents

* I. The House in the Rue de Vaugirard
* II. A Pastel by Latour
* III. The Letter
* IV. The King's Chirurgeon
* V. The King Rises
* VI. Madame du Barry's Mirror
* VII. Monk, Preceptor and Intendant
* VIII. 'Like Dicers' Oaths'
* IX. Venus and Psyche
* X. At the King's Card-Table
* XI. The Apparition
* XII. Death of Louis xv
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Monsieur Bossu's Treatise of the Epick Poem/Errata

ERRATA.
PAge 2. Line 34. read Of Epick Poesie. p. 9. l. 12. for Morals r. Manners. P. 10. l. 24. r. Regimens. p. 14. l 29. r. Of the Fable. p. 28. l. 18. r. so much as desiring. p. 29. l. 27. r. Cutting off his Enemies. p. 43. l. 24. for Model r. Draught. p. 50. l. 11. r. at an end. p. 65. l. 16. for this r. that. p. 72. l. 40. for the r. this, King of Kings. p. 110. l. 11. r. Obligation. p. 112. l. 10. r. Ilus. p. 121. l. 31. r. Glaring. p. 138. l. 29. for yes r. lies. p. 139. l. 9. for two r. too. p. 148. l. 33. for he follows his Advice r. whose Advice he follows. p. 149. l. 15. r. concerning the Continuity. p. 151. l. 14. for two r. too. p. 168. l. antepenult. r. that these are not vices. p. 171. l. 17. r. relentless. p. 174. l. 16. r. to distinguish. p. 182. l. 35. for Faces r. Phases. p. 187. l. 4. r. Valet. p. 197. l. 22. r. dazzling. p. 203. l. 15. for Print r. Rein. p. 208. l. 11. r. Glaring. p. 213. l. 12. r. Raze: ibid. l. 17. r. and to break down Bridges. p. 214. l. ult. r. Spaces. p. 217. l. 13. r. to own. p. 218. l. 34. r. in this sort of Writing. p. 226. l. 1. for learn r. leave. p. 245. l. 36. r. to an Amazon. p. 250. l. 10. for befel r. be felt. p. 263. l. 26. for Projections r. Proportions.
Layout 2
# Most sweet it is

Most sweet it is with unuplifted eyes
To pace the ground, if path be there or none, While a fair region round the traveller lies Which he forbears again to look upon; Pleased rather with some soft ideal scene, The work of Fancy, or some happy tone Of meditation, slipping in between The beauty coming and the beauty gone. If Thought and Love desert us, from that day Let us break off all commerce with the Muse: With Thought and Love companions of our way, Whate'er the senses take or may refuse, The Mind's internal heaven shall shed her dews Of inspiration on the humblest lay.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Moth-Mullein

This edition was published in 1890. There is no source document for verification of the text.
* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
* Chapter VII
* Chapter VIII
* Chapter IX
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1924, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 99 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Moth-Mullein/Chapter IX

At the refreshment stall of the junction to the new line, some time after what has been related, might be seen a young woman in black with wonderfully light hair, so light as to be nearly if not quite silver, a young woman with a beautifully delicate, pure complexion; one with an expression of sadness on her face, but with that sadness tinged with a certain sweetness, the sweetness of humility and modesty. The guards, and the young men who came to the bar, never ventured on any familiarity with her, but always treated her with deference, and addressed her as ‘Mrs Duck.’ A year passed, and then, one day between trains, when the girls were away, and only Moth was there, Sam Underwood came into the refreshment room. He looked round, saw that no one was within earshot, leaned across the counter, and said, ‘Moth!—I mean Mrs Duck—what do you say? Will you take me now? I’m well off; and we’ll have a splendid wedding and a carriage and pair.’
She shook her head.
‘My first carriage and pair is not yet paid for.’
‘Indeed—I know it is.’
‘Yes, the host of the “Blue Boar” is satisfied. But I still owe it to Dick.’
No, she would not have Sam Underwood. No, nor Joseph Ruddle, when he asked. No, nor Ben Polson, when he came for the same purpose. And when Mr Parkinson hung about the bar and asked for a glass of bitter, or a nip of cherry brandy, and looked tender things, did she encourage him to make any further advance? No, not by a sign.
On All-Hallow E’en the old head-keeper, Finch, came to look in on her at her lodging.
‘Mrs Duck,’ he said, ‘now I understand it. That lead-running was not all gammon. The second heart after all was broke—that is, all its pride and hardness gave way. The shell was broke.’
She liked to talk to Finch as to a father; he had known her from a child. She told him how troubled poor Dick had been because he had incurred debts—especially about the wedding conveyance—through her pride; and how she thought about the wrong she had done him, and grieved over it.
‘Mrs Duck—Moth,’ said he; ‘Dick was the gentlest and most forgiving creetur there ever was; what was that paper he thrust on you as he died?
* ‘“For a Carridge and Pear, etceterer,
* Sottled?”
What is “Etceterer”? Everything between you scored off—sottled. He bore no grudges—not Dick!—sottled!’
THE END
# Mexico under Carranza/Appendix 3

Contents
APPENDIX III
(Adams was shot while attending funeral of his wife.)
Anton, George.
(Benton was an English subject and his murder was made a subject of correspondence between England and this country.)
(Corbett was an employee of Palomas Land & Cattle Co.)
(By bullet fired across the river.)
(Gillette was formerly a resident of Cleveland. Murdered at his plantation. His wife was tied to a tree while husband was killed as she looked on.)
(Formerly professor in the University of California.)
(Probably same as Seffer Olson, listed under "O".)
(Shope is given in list of killed in 1910.)
(Beheaded when he refused to pay money.)
Body taken to Mazatlan and buried under super vision of American Consul Alger.)
VICTIMS OF CUMBRE TUNNEL HORROR, FEBRUARY 4, 1914 :
| Mrs. Lee Carruth and 5 | J. I. Morris E. |
| children | J. McCutcheon |
| M. J. Gilmartin | Bernard Schofield |
| Patrick Kelly | John E. Webster |
| H. F. Maderis | Lee Williams |
| LIST OF MARINES SAID TO HAVE BEEN KILLED AT VERA CRUZ, APRIL 24, 1914 ||
| Louis Frank Boswell | Rufus Edward Percy |
| Francis P. De Lowry | George Poinsette |
| Frank Deverick | John F. Schumacher |
| Elzie C. Fisher | Chas. Allen Smith |
| Lewis Oscar Fried | Albin Eric Stream |
| E. H. Frolichstein | Randolph Summerlin |
| Daniel A. Haggerty | Walter L. Watson |
| Dennis J. Lane | C. G. De Fabir |
| Sam Martin | |
SANTA YSABEL MASSACRE, JANUARY 9, 1916 :
| Maurice Anderson | W. D. Pearce |
| A. H. Couch Chas. | A. Pringle |
| Thos. M. Evans | E. L. Robinson |
| Alexander Hall | M. B. Romero |
| H. C. Hase | R. H. Simmons |
| Thomas Johnson | Charles Wadley |
| J. P. McCoy | W. J. Wallace |
| Richard McHatton | C. R. Watson |
| George Newman | J. W. Woon |
| COLUMBUS RAID, MARCH 10, 1916 ||
| Mrs. Milton James | Dr. H. M. Hart, Veterinary |
| W. A. Davidson, Nat'l | W. T. Ritchie, civilian |
| Guard | C. Dewitt Miller, civilian |
| J. T. Dean, civilian | N. R. Walker, civilian |
| J. J. Moore, civilian | Mark A. Dobbs, Sergt. |
| C. C. Miller, (?) civilian | 13th Cav. |
| John Nievergelt, Band | Paul Simon, Band |
| Sergt. | James Butler, Private |
| Harry Wiswell, Corp. | Troop F |
| Troop G | Harry Davis, Co. K, Nat'l |
| Frank T. Kindvall, Troop | Guard |
| K | |
| Fred Griffin, Troop K |
| Total number of victims, 66 ||
| CARRIZAL, JUNE 18, 1916 ||
| Lieut. Henry Adair, Capt. Boyd and thirteen American negro soldiers whose names have not been made public. ||
# Mexico under Carranza/Contents

Contents
CONTENTS
page :
| Preface | vii |
| Chapter I ||
| How the People of Mexico Have Fared Under the Carranza Régime | 3 |
| Chapter II ||
| Character of the Carranza Revolutionary Party Constituting the Recognized Government of Mexico — The Relations Established with the United States and the Rest of the World | 42 |
| Chapter III ||
| Character of Foreign Investments in Mexico. Particularly Those of Americans — Relations of These Investments to the Economic Condition of the Country — Dealings Between Foreign Investors and the Mexican Government | 93 |
| Chapter IV ||
| How the Carrancistas Have Treated the Interests of Foreign Investors | 147 ​ |
| Chapter V ||
| Causes of the Evils Which Have Afflicted the Mexican People Since Their Existence as a Self-Governing Nation Began in 1821 — The Remedy | 194 |
| Appendix I ||
| The General Law for the Construction of International and Interoceanic Railways | 239 |
| Appendix II ||
| Union and Central Pacific Railroads | 245 |
| Appendix III ||
| Revised List of American Citizens Killed in Mexico by Armed Mexicans During the Revolutionary Period Between December, 1910, and September i, 1916 | 248 |
| Appendix IV ||
| List of 6 1 Outrages Committed in the Oil Regions of Mexico Alone in a Period of Six Months and Eight Days | 263 |
# Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Minton
United States Supreme Court
349 U.S. 427
Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Company
Argued: March 3, 1955. --- Decided: June 6, 1955
Mr. Stuart Rothman, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Eberhard P. Deutsch, New Orleans, La., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mitchell v. Board of Commissioners of Leavenworth County Kansas/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
91 U.S. 206
Mitchell v. Board of Commissioners of Leavenworth County Kansas
We think the decision in this case was correct. United States notes are exempt from taxation by or under state or municipal authority; but a court of equity will not knowingly use its extraordinary powers to promote any such scheme as this plaintiff devised to escape his proportionate share of the burdens of taxation. His remedy, if he has any, is in a court of law.
The decree is affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mitchell Store Building Company v. Carroll

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
232 U.S. 379
Mitchell Store Building Company v. Carroll
Argued: January 28, 1914. --- Decided: February 24, 1914
Messrs. P. Lincoln Mitchell and Walter A. De Camp for appellant.
Messrs. Joseph S. Graydon, Joseph L. Lackner, and Lawrence Maxwell for appellee.
Mr. Justice Day delivered the memorandum opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mitchell v. Budd

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
350 U.S. 473
Mitchell v. Budd
Argued: Feb. 29 and March 1, 1956. --- Decided: March 26, 1956
See 351 U.S. 934, 76 S.Ct. 786.
Bessie Margolin, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Milton C. Denbo, Washington, D.C., for respondents Budd, and King Edward Tobacco Co.
Mr. Mark F. Hughes, New York City, for respondent May Tobacco Co.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mitchell v. Burlington

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
71 U.S. 270
Mitchell v. Burlington
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Iowa.
Mr. Grant, for the plaintiff in error; Mr. Ewing, contra.
Mr. Justice CLIFFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Michael Strogoff

* Michael Strogoff (1876), translated by Agnes Kinloch Kingston (the link leads actually to the 1911 text)
* Michael Strogoff (1895 published by Charles Scribner's sons) IA IA
* Michael Strogoff, in Works of Jules Verne/Michael_Strogoff, volume 8, 1911
* Michael Strogoff, illustrated by N. C. Wyeth, 1927 (transcription project)
# Michael Strogoff (1876)

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Michael Strogoff: The Courier of the Czar (French: Michel Strogoff) is a novel written by Jules Verne in 1876. It is considered one of Verne's best books by critics. Unlike some of Verne's other famous novels, it is not science fiction. Warning: template has been deprecated.

### Book I

* Chapter I: A Fete at the New Palace
* Chapter II: Russians and Tartars
* Chapter III: Michael Strogoff Meets the Czar
* Chapter IV: From Moscow to Nijni-Novgorod
* Chapter V: The Two Announcements
* Chapter VI: Brother and Sister
* Chapter VII: Going Down the Volga
* Chapter VIII: Going Up the Kama
* Chapter IX: Day and Night in a Tarantass
* Chapter X: A Storm in the Ural Mountains
* Chapter XI: Travelers in Distress
* Chapter XII: Provocation
* Chapter XIII: Duty Before Everything
* Chapter XIV: Mother and Son
* Chapter XV: The Marshes of the Baraba
* Chapter XVI: A Final Effort
* Chapter XVII: The Rivals

### Book II

* Chapter I: A Tartar Camp
* Chapter II: Correspondents in Trouble
* Chapter III: Blow for Blow
* Chapter IV: The Triumphal Entry
* Chapter V: "Look While You May!"
* Chapter VI: A Friend on the Highway
* Chapter VII: The Passage of the Yenisei
* Chapter VIII: A Hare Crosses the Road
* Chapter IX: In the Steppe
* Chapter X: Baikal and Angara
* Chapter XI: Between Two Banks
* Chapter XII: Irkutsk
* Chapter XIII: The Czar's Courier
* Chapter XIV: The Night of the Fifth of October
* Chapter XV: Conclusion
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Geographic Magazine/Volume 31/Number 6
## June, 1917

    Wikimedia Commons has a list of illustrations for this issue.
* Reviving a Lost Art
    Photographs by Charles Martin and David Fairchild
* Our State Flowers: The Floral Emblems Chosen by the Commonwealths
    By the Editor — Paintings by Mary E. Eaton
* Our First Alliance
    By J. J. Jusserand
* Madonnas of Many Lands
    A duotone insert with 16 illustrations.
* Our Second Alliance
    By J. J. Jusserand
* The Conversion of Old Newspapers and Candle Ends Into Fuel
    Photographs by Charles Martin and Ethel M. Bagg