OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# One Hundred Poems by Kabir/12

XII
II. 24. haṃsā, kaho purātan bāt
Tell me, O Swan, your ancient tale.
From what land do you come, O Swan ? to what shore will you fly ?
Where would you take your rest, O Swan, and what do you seek ?
Even this morning, O Swan, awake, arise, follow me !
There is a land where no doubt nor sorrow have rule: where the terror of Death is no more.
There the woods of spring are a-bloom, and the fragrant scent "He is I" is borne on the wind:
There the bee of the heart is deeply immersed, and desires no other joy.
# One Hundred Million Soldiers

Fellow countrymen, to win this war, Congress pledged the resources of the United States to the last man and the last dollar. When you applauded that, you agreed that we would be a united nation, prepared to make every sacrifice necessary to win this fight. Have we the strength of character to carry out that pledge? We ought clearly to comprehend that this is a war of equipment. Our men may be as brave as any heros ever were, but they cannot successfully fight this sort of fight barehanded. They must have the equipment of guns great and small, of ammunition, of a sky full of airplanes, and of a bridge of ships across the Atlantic. The cost of that, together with the cost of what we must manufacture for our allies, will represent of money value of nearly 19 billion dollars.
We cannot fight a war without money, that we all know. But after all we cannot win a war with money. You could dress a soldier in dollar bills and he would still be cold. It is the output of the workshop that we must have. We are just now seeing that money will not build a fire in a furnace. That needs coal, and money will not secure coal where the coal cannot be transported. We are learning that appropriations, and treasury credit do not equip the army, unless there are other raw materials -- the workshop, and the manpower -- which that money can command. Sticking a label on a bottle does not fill the bottle; making an appropriation does not build a ship. There are not men enough to make for us our ordinary comforts and luxuries and at the same time build the ships and fighting equipment needed. If we will recognize that fact, we will then see why each one of us must give up some of our ordinary comforts and luxuries. If we do not, the army cannot be equipped in time.
So we must see to it that every one of our hundred million Americans enlist in that great army back of our soldiers. We must all serve. The responsibility is upon you to decide how you will serve. Whether in the army in khaki or in the larger army -- the hundred million army. You must go or forego. You must fight or sacrifice. You are the Kaiser's ally if you make men work for you manufacturing luxuries while guns are still unforged and ships unbuilt. Join the hundred million army. Then mark your service by foregoing unnecessary things and bringing, buying with the money you save bonds of the United States, big bonds if you can, baby bonds in any event. Buying war saving stamps means equipping the army, means saving the lives of American soldiers, means whipping the Huns, and redeeming the world for civilization.
# One Hundred Poems by Kabir

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Translated in 1915
ONE HUNDRED POEMS
OF
KABIR
TRANSLATED BY
RABINDRANATH TAGORE
ASSISTED BY
EVELYN UNDERHILL
INDIAN EDlTION
MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED ST. MARTIN'S STREET, LONDON
COPYRIGHT
First Edition February 1913 Reprinted September 1915, 1918, 1921, 1923, 1926, 1929, 1934, 1943, 1945, 1948
PRINTED FROM PLATES, BY G. F. BEST, AT THE I. S. S. D. PRESS, 95$^B$, CHITTARANJAN AVENUE, OPPOSITE MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, CALCUTTA.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# One Hundred Poems by Kabir/1

I
I. 13. mo ko kahāṉ ḍhūṉṛo bande
O servant, where dost thou seek Me? Lo! I am beside thee. I am neither in temple nor in mosque: I am neither in Kaaba nor in Kailash: Neither am I in rites and ceremonies, nor in Yoga and renunciation. If thou art a true seeker, thou shalt at once see Me: thou shalt meet Me in a moment of time. Kabir says, “O Sadhu! God is the breath of all breath.”
# One Hundred Poems by Kabir/11

XI
I. 131. niś din khelat rahī sakhiyān saṅg
I played day and night with my comrades, and now I am greatly afraid.
So high is my Lord’s palace, my heart trembles to mount its stairs: yet I must not be shy, if I would enjoy His love.
My heart must cleave to my Lover; I must withdraw my veil, and meet Him with all my body:
Mine eyes must perform the ceremony of the lamps of love.
Kabir says: “Listen to me, friend: he understands who loves. If you feel not love’s longing for your Beloved One, it is vain to adorn your body, vain to put unguent on your eyelids.”
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 2/Sister Anna's probation - Part 3

←Part 2Part 4→
​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/375 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/376 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/377 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/378 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/379 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/380 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/381 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/382 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/383
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 2/Sister Anna's probation - Part 5

←Part 4
​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/431 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/432 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/433 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/434 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/435 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/436
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 2/Sister Anna's probation - Part 1

Part 2→
​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/319 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/320 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/321 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/322 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/323 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/324 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/325
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 2/Sister Anna's probation - Part 2

←Part 1Part 3→
​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/347 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/348 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/349 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/350 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/351 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/352 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/353 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/354
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 2/Sister Anna's probation - Part 4

←Part 3Part 5→
​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/403 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/404 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/405 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/406 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/407 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/408
# Old Cookery Books and Ancient Cuisine

* related portals: Cookbooks.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
The Book-Lover's Library Edited by Henry B. Wheatley, F.S.A.
OLD COOKERY BOOKS AND ANCIENT CUISINE
BY W. CAREW HAZLITT
POPULAR EDITION LONDON
THE BOOK-LOVERS LIBRARY was first published in the following styles:
No. 1.—Printed on antique paper, in cloth bevelled with rough edges, price 4s. 6d.
No. 2.—Printed on hand-made paper, in Roxburgh, half morocco, with gilt top: 250 only are printed, for sale in England, price 7s. 6d.
No. 3.—Large paper edition, on hand-made paper; of which 50 copies only are printed, and bound in Roxburgh, for sale in England, price £1 1s.
There are a few sets left, and can be had on application to the Publisher.

## Table of Contents

* Introductory
* The Early Englishman and His Food
* Royal Feasts and Savage Pomp
* Cookery Books, part 1
* Cookery Books, part 2, Select Extracts from an Early Recipt-Book
* Cookery Books, part 3
* Cookery Books, part 4
* Diet of the Yeoman and the Poor
* Meats and Drinks
* The Kitchen
* Meals
* Etiquette of the Table
* Index
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/The Fourth Ecumenical Council/Canons/Canon XIII

Canon XIII.
Strange and unknown clergymen without letters commendatory from their own Bishop, are absolutely prohibited from officiating in another city.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon XIII.
No cleric shall be received to communion in another city without a letter commendatory.
“Unknown clergymen.” I have here followed the reading of the Greek commentators. But the translators of the Prisca, and Dionysius, and Isidore must have all read ἀναγνώστας (i.e., Readers) instead of ἀγνώστους.  Justellus, Hervetus, and Beveridge, as also Johnson and Hammond, follow the reading of the text. Hefele suggests that if “Readers” is the correct reading perhaps it means, “all clergymen even readers.”
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/The Fourth Ecumenical Council/Canons/Canon XIX

Canon XIX.
Whereas it has come to our ears that in the provinces the Canonical Synods of Bishops are not held, and that on this account many ecclesiastical matters which need reformation are neglected; therefore, according to the canons of the holy Fathers, the holy Synod decrees that the bishops of every province shall twice in the year assemble together where the bishop of the Metropolis shall approve, and shall then settle whatever matters may have arisen.  And bishops, who do not attend, but remain in their own cities, though they are in good health and free from any unavoidable and necessary business, shall receive a brotherly admonition.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon XIX.
Twice each year the Synod shall be held whereever the bishop of the Metropolis shall designate, and all matters of pressing interest shall be determined.
See notes on Canon V. of Nice, and on Canon XX. of Antioch, and compare canon VIII. of the council in Trullo.
Bright.
Hilary of Arles and his suffragans, assembled at Riez, had already, in 439 qualified the provision for two by adding significantly “if the times are quiet” (Mansi, v., 1194). The words were written at the close of ten years’ war, during which the Visigoths of Septimania “were endeavouring to take Arles and Narbonne” (Hodgkin, Italy and her Invaders, ii., 121).
This canon is found in the Corpus Juris Canonici, Gratian’s Decretum, Pars I., Dist. XVIII., canon vj.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/The Fourth Ecumenical Council/Canons/Canon XI

Canon XI.
We have decreed that the poor and those needing assistance shall travel, after examination, with letters merely pacifical from the church, and not with letters commendatory, inasmuch as letters commendatory ought to be given only to persons who are open to suspicion.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon XL.
Let the poor who stand in need of help make their journey with letters pacificatory and not commendatory: For letters commendatory should only be given to those who are open to suspicion.
Aristenus.
…The poor who need help should journey with letters pacificatory from the bishop, so that those who have the ability to help them may be moved with pity. These need no letters commendatory, such letters should be shown, however, by presbyters and deacons, and by the rest of the clergy.
See notes on canons vij., viij., and xj. of Antioch; and on canon xlij. of Laodicea.
Hefele.
The mediaeval commentators, Balsamon, Zonaras, and Aristenus, understand this canon to mean that letters of commendation, συστατικαὶ , commendatitiæ litteræ were given to those laymen and clerics who were previously subject to ecclesiastical censure, and therefore were suspected by other bishops, and for this reason needed a special recommendation, in order to be received in another church into the number of the faithful. The letters of peace (εἰρηνικαί) on the contrary, were given to those who were in undisturbed communion with their bishop, and had not the least evil reputation abroad.
Our canon was understood quite differently by the old Latin writers, Dionysius Exiguus and Isidore, who translate the words ἐν ὑπολήψει by personæ honoratiores and clariores, and the learned Bishop Gabriel Aubespine of Orleans has endeavored to prove, in his notes to our canon, that the litteræ pacificæ were given to ordinary believers, and the commendatitiæ (συστατικαί) on the contrary, only to clerics and to distinguished laymen; and in favour of this view is the xiii. canon of Chalcedon.
With regard to this much-vexed point, authorities are so divided that no absolute judgment can be arrived at. The interpretation I have followed is that of the Greeks and of Hervetus, which seems to be supported by Apostolic Canon XIII., and was that adopted by Johnson and Hammond. On the other hand are the Prisca, Dionysius, Isidore, Tillemont, Routh, and to these Bright seems to unite himself by saying that this “sense is the more natural.”
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/The Fourth Ecumenical Council/Canons/Canon XV

Canon XV.
A woman shall not receive the laying on of hands as a deaconess under forty years of age, and then only after searching examination. And if, after she has had hands laid on her and has continued for a time to minister, she shall despise the grace of God and give herself in marriage, she shall be anathematized and the man united to her.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon XV.
No person shall be ordained deaconess except she be forty years of age. If she shall dishonour her ministry by contracting a marriage, let her be anathema.
This canon should be read carefully in connexion with what is said in the Excursus on deaconesses to canon xix. of Nice.
This canon is found in the Corpus Juris Canonici, Gratian’s Decretum, Pars II., Causa XXVII, Quæst. I., Canon xxiij.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/The Fourth Ecumenical Council/Canons/Canon XVI

Canon XVI.
It is not lawful for a virgin who has dedicated herself to the Lord God, nor for monks, to marry; and if they are found to have done this, let them be excommunicated.  But we decree that in every place the bishop shall have the power of indulgence towards them.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon XVI.
Monks or nuns shall not contract marriage, and if they do so let them be excommunicated.
Van Espen.
Since this canon says nothing at all of separation in connexion with a marriage made contrary to a vow, but only orders separation from communion, it seems very likely that vows of this kind at the time of the synod were not considered diriment but only impedient impediments from which the bishop of the diocese could dispense at least as far as the canonical punishment was concerned.
Hefele.
The last part of the canon gives the bishop authority in certain circumstances not to inflict the excommunication which is threatened in the first part, or again to remove it. Thus all the old Latin translators understood our text; but Dionysius Exiguus and the Prisca added confitentibus, meaning, “if such a virgin or monk confess and repent their fault, then the bishop may be kind to them.” That the marriage of a monk is invalid, as was ruled by later ecclesiastical law, our canon does not say; on the contrary, it assumes its validity, as also the marriages contracted by priests until the beginning of the twelfth century were regarded as valid.
This canon is found in the Corpus Juris Canonici, Gratian’s Decretum, Pars II., Causa xxvii., Quæst. I., canon xxii., from Isidore’s version; it is also found in Dionysius’s version as canon xij. of the same Quæstio, Causa, and Part, where it is said to be taken “ex Concilio Triburiensi.”
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/The Fourth Ecumenical Council/Canons/Canon XVII

Canon XVII.
Outlying or rural parishes shall in every province remain subject to the bishops who now have jurisdiction over them, particularly if the bishops have peaceably and continuously governed them for the space of thirty years. But if within thirty years there has been, or is, any dispute concerning them, it is lawful for those who hold themselves aggrieved to bring their cause before the synod of the province. And if any one be wronged by his metropolitan, let the matter be decided by the exarch of the diocese or by the throne of Constantinople, as aforesaid. And if any city has been, or shall hereafter be newly erected by imperial authority, let the order of the ecclesiastical parishes follow the political and municipal example.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon XVII.
Village and rural parishes if they have been possessed for thirty years, they shall so continue. But if within that time, the matter shall be subject to adjudication. But if by the command of the Emperor a city be renewed, the order of ecclesiastical parishes shall follow the civil and public forms.
Bright.
The adjective ἐγχωρίους is probably synonymous with ἀγροικικάς (“rusticas,” Prisca), although Dionysius and Isidorian take in as “situated on estates,” cf. Routh, Scr. Opusc., ii., 109. It was conceivable that some such outlying districts might form, ecclesiastically, a border-land, it might not be easy to assign them definitively to this or that bishopric. In such a case, says the Council, if the bishop who is now in possession of these rural churches can show a prescription of thirty years in favour of his see, let them remain undisturbed in his obedience. (Here ἀβιάστως may be illustrated from βιασάμενος in Eph. viij. and for the use of οἰκονομεῖν see I. Const., ij.) But the border-land might be the “debate-able” land: the two neighbour bishops might dispute as to the right to tend these “sheep in the wilderness;” as we read in Cod. Afric., 117, “multæ controversiæ postea inter episcopos de diœcesibus ortæ sunt, et oriuntur” (see on I. Const., ij.); as archbishop Thomas of York, and Remigius of Dorchester, were at issue for years “with reference to Lindsey” (Raine, Fasti Eborac., i. 150).  Accordingly, the canon provides that if such a contest had arisen within the thirty years, or should thereafter arise, the prelate who considered himself wronged might appeal to the provincial synod.  If he should be aggrieved at the decision of his metropolitan in synod, he might apply for redress to the eparch (or prefect, a substitute for exarch) of the “diocese,” or to the see of Constantinople (in the manner provided by canon ix.). It is curious “that in Russia all the sees are divided into eparchies of the first, second, and third class” (Neale, Essays on Liturgiology, p. 302).
This canon is found in the Corpus Juris Canonici, Gratian’s Decretum, Pars II., Causa XVI., Quæst. iii., can. j., in Isidore Mercator’s version.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Hefele does not give this reference, and Van Espen gives it incorrectly as causa xix. instead of xvi.
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 4/My uncle's handbook

Contributor unknown.
​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/615 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/616 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/617
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 4/Last week (March 30, 1861)

​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/401 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/402 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/403
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 4/Last week (May 4, 1861)

​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/541 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/542 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/543
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 4/Last week (May 11, 1861)

​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/569 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/570 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/571
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 4/Last week (May 18, 1861)

​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/597 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/598 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/599
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 4/Love's photograph

LOVE’S PHOTOGRAPH.
[Laura is duly “engaged,” and offers Charles her photographic likeness.]
I’ve a portrait already of thee, ladie mine, Love used the photographer’s art. You look’d for awhile with your bonny bright smile, And ’twas fix’d on my sensitive heart. You do not believe it? Then see in my eyes This image that dwells in my breast, Thy minature, beauty mine, loving and gay, Jumps up to convince you, and when you’re away, Sinks back to the place of its rest.
A. F.
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 4/Last week (May 25, 1861)

​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/625 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/626 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/627
# Open access and the humanities

OPEN ACCESS AND THE HUMANITIES
Contexts, Controversies and the Future
MARTIN PAUL EVE
Cambridge University Press
Contents :
| Preface by Peter Suber | page ix |
| Acknowledgements | xii |
| Citing this work | xv |
| 1 Introduction, or why open access? | 1 |
| 2 Digital economics | 43 |
| 3 Open licensing | 86 |
| 4 Monographs | 112 |
| 5 Innovations | 137 |
| Notes | 152 |
| Glossary of open access terms | 179 |
| Bibliography | 182 |
| Index | 201 |
This work is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license, which allows free use, distribution, and creation of derivatives, so long as the license is unchanged and clearly noted, and the original author is attributed—and if you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same license as this one.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Open Road

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Open Road."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* The Open Road, a work by Katharine Tynan
* The Open Road, a work by Edward Verrall Lucas
# Northern Pacific Railway Company v. Slaght

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States, Northern Pacific Railway.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
205 U.S. 122
Northern Pacific Railway Company v. Slaght
Argued: and submitted January 11, 1907. --- Decided: March 11, 1907
Messrs. Charles W. Bunn and James B. Kerr for plaintiffs in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 122-124 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. U. L. Ettinger, Thomas Neill, and W. E. McCroskey for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Northern Pacific Railway Company v. Solum

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
247 U.S. 477
Northern Pacific Railway Company v. Solum
Argued: March 19, 1918. --- Decided: June 10, 1918
Messrs. Charles Donnelly and C. W. Bunn, both of St. Paul, Minn., for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Henry C. Flannery, of Minneapolis, Minn., and Lyndon A. Smith, of St. Paul, Minn., for defendant in error Solum.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Northern Pacific Railway Company v. Puget Sound & Willapa Harbor Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
250 U.S. 332
Northern Pacific Railway Company v. Puget Sound & Willapa Harbor Railway Company
Argued: April 28, 1919. --- Decided: June 2, 1919
Messrs. Lorenzo B. Da Ponte, of Tacoma, Wash., and C. W. Bunn and Charles Donnelly, both of St. Paul, Minn., for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Heman H. Field, of Chicago, Ill., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice CLARKE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse