OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Letting Children be Children

Also called the "Bailey Review", published by the Department of Education in London.
​Letting Children be Children
Report of an Independent Review of the Commercialisation and Sexualisation of Childhood by Reg Bailey
Department for Education
Letting Children be Children
Report of an Independent Review of the Commercialisation and Sexualisation of Childhood
Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Education by Command of Her Majesty
June 2011
© Crown copyright 2011
You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or e-mail: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk.
Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.
Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at www.education.gov.uk/help/contacts
This publication is also available for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk
This document is also available from our website at http://www.education.gov.uk/publications
ISBN: 9780101807821
Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office
ID: P002431733 06/11
Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum.
​Contents
This work is licensed under the United Kingdom Open Government Licence v3.0.
    You are free to:
   * copy, publish, distribute and transmit the Information;
   * adapt the Information;
   * exploit the Information commercially and non-commercially for example, by combining it with other Information, or by including it in your own product or application.
    You must, where you do any of the above:
   * acknowledge the source of the Information in your product or application by including or linking to any attribution statement specified by the Information Provider(s) and, where possible, provide a link to this licence.
   * If the Information Provider does not provide a specific attribution statement, you must use the following:
    Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
    This license does NOT cover:
   * personal data in the Information;
   * Information that has not been accessed by way of publication or disclosure under information access legislation (including the Freedom of Information Acts for the UK and Scotland) by or with the consent of the Information Provider;
   * departmental or public sector organisation logos, crests and the Royal Arms except where they form an integral part of a document or dataset;
   * military insignia;
   * third party rights the Information Provider is not authorised to license;
   * other intellectual property rights, including patents, trade marks, and design rights; and
   * identity documents such as the British Passport.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Letting Children be Children/Annex C

Published by the Department of Education in London.
​Annex C
Interviews for this Review
Advertising Association Advertising Standards Association Asda Authority for Television on Demand BBC Box Music Ltd British Retail Consortium British Toy and Hobby Association Brook BSkyB Channel 4 Channel 5 Children's Charities' Coalition on Internet Safety Children's Society Clearcast Consumer Focus Credos Department for Education's Violence Against Women and Girls Advisory Group Dubit Ltd Facebook Family and Parenting Institute Family Lives Golden Bear Toys Dr Amanda Gummer Sheena Horgan Hornby Internet Advertising Bureau ITV John Lewis Partnership Marks & Spencer Media Smart MTV Europe Mumsnet Netmums Next Ofcom Office of the Children's Commissioner for England Teresa Orange Outdoor Media Centre Platform 51 Portman Group Primark Dr Rachel Russell Shop Direct Group Tesco UK Council for Child Internet Safety, Executive Board UK Interactive Entertainment
# Kidnapped in London

Kidnapped in London
Being the Story of my
CAPTURE BY,
AND
RELEASE FROM
The Chinese Legation, London
BY
SUN YAT SEN
BRISTOL J. W. Arrowsmith, 11 Quay Street LONDON Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent and Company Limited
1897
CONTENTS.
Page
CHAPTER I.
CHAPTER II.
CHAPTER III.
CHAPTER IV.
CHAPTER V.
CHAPTER VI.
CHAPTER VII.
CHAPTER VIII.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days), and it was first published before 1989 without complying with U.S. copyright formalities (renewal and/or copyright notice) and it was in the public domain in its home country on the URAA date (January 1, 1996 for most countries).
The longest-living author of this work died in 1925, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 98 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 173/Issue 2244/To Alfred J. Church

Originally published in Spectator.
As happy children who in careless play Scatter bright blossoms on their homeward way, So thou on life's rough path hast scattered flowers, To lighten some dark day, or bitter hours, Unto thy brothers, who, with weary feet, Pause in the toil of live thy voice to greet, That as an organ pealing, loud then low, Like the loved voices silent long ago, Lingers within our hearts, and never we Its echoes may forget as long as time shall be. And now these fadeless blossoms thou hast twined Into a wreath; and ever shall the wind Of time blow softly o'er them, and the air Seem sweeter for the gift of things so fair. The lowest place thou wert content to win, So thou couldst find but room to enter in, And lay thy chaplet there before that shrine, Amid so much the world doth deem divine. Yea, thou hast passed the portal, and hast found That with the laurel green thy brow is bound.
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 173/Issue 2244/The New Marriage Bill

Originally published in Law Times.
The New Marriage Bill - The attorney-general’s bill for amending the law respecting the attendance of registrars at marriages in Nonconformist places of worship has now been published. It proposes to extend to Dissenting ministers the power of solemnizing marriages without the presence of a registrar, which is now possessed by clergymen in orders recognized by the Church of England and by Quakers and Jews. The proposed privileges are to be confined to those denominations who, in the opinion of the registrar-general, have a central organization sufficient for maintaining discipline among their ministers. A large number of the numerous sects, which are known even by name to few persons outside the registrar-general’s office, would be excluded by this last provision. We have had no religious census in England for five-and-thirty years, but the Irish tables give forty-eight sects which only boast two members apiece, and another fifty whose congregations are all under twenty. The bill is principally designed in the interests of the five great Methodist bodies — the Wesleyans, the New Connexion, the Primitive Methodists, the Bible Christians, and the United Methodist Free Churches — all of whom possess extensive organizations, and, as it requires certain preliminary proceedings to be taken before the registrar, and a return under his hand to be given to the officiating minister, who must be registered, it is difficult to see whom the passing of this long-needed measure can prejudice.
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 174/Issue 2257/Kaiser Dead

Originally published in Fortnightly Review.
April 6, 1887.
What, Kaiser dead? The heavy news Post-haste to Cobden calls the Muse, From where in Farringford she brews  The ode sublime, Or with Pen-bryn's bold bard pursues  A rival rhyme.
Kai's bracelet tail, Kai's busy feet, Were known to all the village street. "What, poor Kai dead?" say all I meet;  "A loss indeed!" O for the croon pathetic, sweet,  Of Robin's reed!
Six years ago I brought him down, A baby dog, from London town; Round his small throat of black and brown  A ribbon blue, And vouch'd by glorious renown  A dachshound true.
His mother, most majestic dame, Of blood unmix'd, from Potsdam came; And Kaiser's race we deem'd the same —  No lineage higher. And so he bore the imperial name.  But ah, his sire!
Soon, soon the days conviction bring. The collie hair, the collie swing, The tail's indomitable ring,  The eye's unrest — The case was clear; a mongrel thing  Kai stood confest.
But all those virtues, which commend The humbler sort who serve and tend, Were thine in store, thou faithful friend.  What sense, what cheer! To us, declining tow'rds our end,  A mate how dear!
For Max, thy brother-dog, began To flag, and feel his narrowing span. And cold, besides, his blue blood ran,  Since, 'gainst the classes, He heard, of late, the Grand Old Man  Incite the masses.
Yes, Max and we grew slow and sad; But Kai, a tireless shepherd-lad, Teeming with plans, alert, and glad  In work or play, Like sunshine went and came, and bade  Live out the day!
Still, still I see the figure smart — Trophy in mouth, agog to start, Then, home return'd, once more depart;  Or prest together Against thy mistress, loving heart,  In winter weather.
I see the tail, like bracelet twirl'd, In moments of disgrace uncurl'd, Then at a pardoning word refurl'd,  A conquering sign; Crying, "Come on, and range the world,  And never pine."
Thine eye was bright, thy coat it shone; Thou hadst thine errands, off and on; In joy thy last morn flew; anon,  A fit! All's over And thou art gone where Geist hath gone,  And Toss, and Rover.
Poor Max, with downcast, reverent head, Regards his brother's form outspread; Full well Max knows the friend is dead  Whose cordial talk, And jokes in doggish language said,  Beguiled his walk.
And Glory, stretch'd at Burwood gate, Thy passing by doth vainly wait; And jealous Jock, thy only hate,  The chiel from Skye, Lets from his shaggy Highland pate  Thy memory die.
Well, fetch his graven collar fine, And rub the steel, and make it shine, And leave it round thy neck to twine,  Kai, in thy grave. There of thy master keep that sign,  And this plain stave.

## Notes

* ↑ Come, join the melancholious croon  O' Robin's reed.  (Burns, Poor Mailie's Elegy.)
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 173/Issue 2244/The Ebb of Love

Originally published in Spectator.
A love that wanes is as an ebbing tide, Which slowly, inch by inch, and scarce perceived, With many a wave that makes brave show to rise, Fails from the shore. No sudden treason turns The long-accustomed loyalty to hate, But years bring weariness for sweet content, And fondness, daily sustenance of love, Which use should make a tribute easier paid, First grudged, and then withholden, starves the heart; And though compassion, or remorseful thoughts Of happy days departed, bring again The ancient tenderness in seeming flood, Not less it ebbs and ebbs till all is bare. O happy shore, the flowing tide shall brim Thy empty pools, and spread dull tangled weeds In streamers many-colored as the lights Which flash in northern heavens, and revive The fainting blossoms of the rocks; but thou, O heart, whence love hath ebbed, art ever bare!
# Littell's Living Age/Volume 174/Issue 2257/Autumn, 1885

Yes, Autumn comes again and finds me here, Last year I thought I should be otherwhere Than 'mid these fading falling leaves; for there, Beneath life's tree whose leaves are never sere But green throughout the great eternal year I thought to lie, and breathe the tranquil air, And see my boy who, being for earth too fair, Is fairer still in that celestial sphere.
Perchance for me his little heart did yearn; Haply to meet me at the golden gate He oft would wander, stand awhile, and turn Away to cry, "My father lingers late." Content thee, little one; my heart doth burn For thee as thine for me, but God says, "Wait!"
# Little v. Herndon/Dissent Miller

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Miller
United States Supreme Court
77 U.S. 26
Little v. Herndon
Mr. Justice MILLER, dissenting.
I dissent from the opinion of the court in this case on the construction of the statute of Illinois of February 21, 1861.
That act mentions certain facts which may be shown without any condition precedent in order to establish the invalidity of a tax deed. These are: 1. That the tax had been paid before sale. 2. That the land was not subject to taxation. 3. That it had been redeemed from the tax sale. 4. That the notice required by the constitution had not been given. 5. That the description of the land was not sufficiently definite.
It then provides that a tax deed, made after the passage of that act, shall not be questioned in any suit for any other cause, unless the party wishing to contest the same shall tender to the claimant under the tax deed, or deposit in the court in which the suit is pending, for his use, the amount of redemption-money required by law to redeem, and ten per cent. per annum interest.
The defendant in this case offered his tax deed, and required of the court to have the amount which he showed by the deed and tax receipts paid or deposited, before the plaintiff should be permitted to question it. The court refused to receive the tax deed in evidence, and permitted the plaintiff to contest it and exclude it from the jury on the ground that no judgment was produced by defendant under which the tax sale was made. The absence of such a judgment is not one of the grounds mentioned for which a deed may be contested without paying the redemption-money as a condition precedent. The decision of the court makes that part of the statute requiring the payment as a condition precedent to contesting the deed a nullity. The policy of the act is clear, and it is wise. It has been a desideratum for years to provide a law which would secure payment of taxes on real estate, and at the same time give the owner of the property, who may not have been prompt, some reasonable opportunity to save it. This law is happily conceived. It says in effect if no valid tax was levied, or if it has been paid, or no notice was given of proceedings for sale, the deed is void, and this may be shown at any time without condition. But if there has been a valid levy of a tax and a sale, and the tax has never been paid, either before or after sale, the party who should have paid this tax and has neglected to do so must pay it now before he can contest the deed made by the proper officer on such sale. This is fair, it is just, and would tend to procure bidders at tax sales, and to admit of redemption on just terms. As there is no decision of the State court of Illinois directly on this point, under this statute, I regret the construction that this court has placed upon it.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Little v. Oregon

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
385 U.S. 902
Little v. Oregon
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oregon.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Little v. Oregon/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
385 U.S. 902
Little v. Oregon
Denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Little v. Williams

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
231 U.S. 335
Little v. Williams
Argued: October 30, 1913. --- Decided: December 1, 1913
Mr. Henry Craft for plaintiff in error.
No appearance for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Van Devanter delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Littlefield v. Bloxham

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
117 U.S. 419
Littlefield v. Bloxham
Argued: March 29, 1886. ---
H. Bisbee, for Littlefield.
J. Aug. Johnson, for Reed.
Wayne MacVeagh, for Bloxham and others.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lochinvar

* "Lochinvar", in Modern reciter (1829), a Scottish chapbook
* "Young Locihnvar", in The Elocutionist (1815-1830), a Scottish chapbook
* "Young Locihnvar", in The Elocutionist (1840-1850), a Scottish chapbook
* "Lochinvar", as stanza XII of Canto V. of Marmion (1889)
* "Lochinvar", in Poems That Every Child Should Know (1904), edited by Mary Elizabeth Burt
# Lochaber No More (Ramsay)

* "Lochaber No More", in The new way of The Soldier's Return (1822), a chapbook printed in Edinburgh
* "Lochaber no more", in York, you're wanted (1823), a chapbook printed in Edinburgh
# Lochaber No More

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Lochaber No More."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Lochaber No More", a poem by Neil Munro
* "Lochaber No More", a poem by Allan Ramsay
# Loper v. Beto/Concurrence White

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion White
* Dissenting Opinions Burger Blackmun Rehnquist
MR. JUSTICE WHITE, concurring in the result.
The Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of Loper's petition for habeas corpus, reasoning that the use of invalid prior convictions to impeach a defendant in a criminal case does not raise an issue of constitutional proportions even though so using those convictions might well have influenced the outcome of the case. It was on that issue that we granted certiorari; and as our past cases now stand, I agree with MR. JUSTICE STEWART that the Court of Appeals' reasons for affirming the District Court were erroneous. This judgment, however, does not necessarily mean that Loper's conviction must be set aside. There remain issues, unresolved by the Court of Appeals, as to whether the challenged prior convictions were legally infirm: was Loper represented by counsel at the time of the earlier convictions; if not, did he waive counsel? These matters are best considered in the first instance by the Court of Appeals. The same is true with respect to the legal significance of the lack of proof with respect to the validity of one or more of the prior convictions used for impeachment purposes at Loper's trial. In this connection, I do not understand our prior decisions to hold that there is no room in cases such as this for a finding of harmless error; and if this case is ultimately to turn on whether there was harmless error or not, I would prefer to have the initial judgment of the lower court.
# Lopez v. United States (373 U.S. 427)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Warren

## Dissenting Opinion

    Brennan
United States Supreme Court
373 U.S. 427
Lopez v. United States
Argued: Jan. 14, 1963. --- Decided: May 27, 1963
Edward J. Davis, Boston, Mass., for petitioner.
Louis F. Claiborne, New Orleans, La., for respondent.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lopez v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Lopez v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Lopez v. United States (373 U.S. 427)
* Lopez v. United States (404 U.S. 1213)
# Lopez v. Texas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
378 U.S. 567
Lopez v. Texas
See 85 S.Ct. 21.
Carlos C. Cadena, for petitioner.
Waggoner Carr, Atty. Gen. of Texas, and James E. Barlow, for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lopez v. Texas/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
378 U.S. 567
Lopez v. Texas
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774.
Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice CLARK, Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# La Belle Dame sans Merci

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "La Belle Dame sans Merci."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "La Belle Dame sans Mercy", a poem by Alain Chartier
* "La Belle Dame sans Merci", a poem by John Keats
# La Belle Dame sans Merci (Keats)

Ballad, first published in 1819. The poem is named after Alain Chartier's poem, "La Belle Dame sans Mercy".
* "La Belle Dame sans Merci", in The Poetical Works of John Keats (1884)
* "La Belle Dame sans Merci", in The complete poetical works and letters of John Keats (1899), edited by Horace Elisha Scudder
* "La Belle Dame sans Merci" (revised, unsourced)
* "La Belle Dame Sans Merci" in Weird Tales, 6 (2) (August 1925)
# La Bayamesa

* related portals: National anthems, Cuba.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
Pedro Felipe Figueredo was a lawyer, landowner, poet and musician, born in 1818, in Bayamo. In the 1860s, he was active in the planning of the uprising against the Spanish which became known as the Ten Years' War. In 1867, he wrote La Bayamesa, which, today, is the national anthem of Cuba. He fought in the Ten Years' War as a general under the command of Carlos Manuel de Céspedes, but in 1870, was captured by the Spanish and was executed in Santiago de Cuba on August 17 of that year.
It is generally accepted that the music of La Bayamesa (an upbeat battle hymm) predates the lyrics by several years. Mambís (peasant soldiers for independence from Spain) would hum the tune along with bugles as they marched into battle.
| Original Al combate corred bayameses Que la patria os comtempla orgullosa No temaís una muerte gloriosa Que morir por la patria es vivir En cadenas vivir es vivir En afrenta y oprobio sumidos Del clarín escuchad el sonido A las armas valientes corred. | Translation Hasten to battle, men of Bayamo, For the fatherland looks proudly to you. Fear not a glorious death, To die for the fatherland is to live. To live in chains is to live In combined dishonour and ignominy. From the clarion hear the call, To arms, brave ones, hasten! |
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.