OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# In re Thomas Kaine an Alleged Fugitive from Great Britain/Dissent Daniel

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Taney Daniel Nelson
* Separate Opinion Curtis
United States Supreme Court
55 U.S. 103
In re Thomas Kaine an Alleged Fugitive from Great Britain
Mr. Justice DANIEL.
The question just disposed of by the court, involving the lives and liberties, not only of those who from abroad may seek protection under our laws, but the lives and liberties of our own citizens, is undoubtedly one of the most important which can claim the vigilance of our government in every department. Having deliberately compared my own views of this vital question with what has been so well expressed by my brother Nelson, and concurring, as I do, in all that he has said upon it, I deem it unnecessary to do more than thus solemnly to attest my adherence to the great principles of law, justice, and liberty vindicated by him.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re Terry

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
128 U.S. 289
In re Terry
[Syllabus from pages 289-290 intentionally omitted]
Upon Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
S. Shellabarger and J. M. Wilson, for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 291-297 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, dilivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re Thomas Kaine an Alleged Fugitive from Great Britain/Dissent Taney

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Taney Daniel Nelson
* Separate Opinion Curtis
United States Supreme Court
55 U.S. 103
In re Thomas Kaine an Alleged Fugitive from Great Britain
Mr. Chief Justice TANEY.
I concur in opinion with my brother Nelson. The questions involved in this application are very grave ones; and I should have felt it to be my duty to state the grounds on which my opinion has been formed, had not the whole subject been so fully and, to my mind, satisfactorily discussed by him. But, concurring, as I do, in all that he has said, I shall forbear any discussion on my part, and content myself with expressing my entire assent to the opinion he has just delivered.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kneeland v. Luce

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
141 U.S. 437
Kneeland v. Luce
R. G. Ingersoll and J. M. Butler, for appellant.
Charles Pratt, for appellees.
BREWER, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Knetsch v. United States
## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
364 U.S. 361
Knetsch v. United States
Argued: Oct. 17, 18, 1960. --- Decided: Nov 14, 1960
Mr. W. Lee McLane, Jr., Phoenix, Ariz., for petitioners.
Mr. Grant W. Wiprud, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Knepper v. Sands

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
194 U.S. 476
Knepper v. Sands
Argued: and submitted April 19, 1904. --- Decided: May 31, 1904
Mr. I. S. Struble for Knepper.
Messrs. John H. King, N. B. Davis, and King & Stearns for Sands.
Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Knetsch v. United States/Dissent Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Douglas
* Wikipedia article
United States Supreme Court
364 U.S. 361
Knetsch v. United States
Argued: Oct. 17, 18, 1960. --- Decided: Nov 14, 1960
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, with whom Mr. Justice WHITTAKER and Mr. Justice STEWART concur, dissenting.
I agree with the views expressed by Judge Moore in Diggs v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 281 F.2d 326, 330-332, and by Judge Brown, writing for himself and Judge Hutcheson, in United States v. Bond, 5 Cir., 258 F.2d 577.
It is true that in this transaction the taxpayer was bound to lose if the annuity contract is taken by itself. At least the taxpayer showed by his conduct that he never intended to come out ahead on that investment apart from this income tax deduction. Yet the same may be true where a taxpayer borrows money at 5% or 6% interest to purchase securities that pay only nominal interest; or where, with money in the bank earning 3%, he borrows from the self same bank at a higher rate. His aim there, as here, may only to be get a tax deduction for interest paid. Yet as long as the transaction itself is not hocus-pocus, the interest charges incident to completing it would seem to be deductible under the Internal Revenue Code as respects annuity contracts made prior to March 1, 1954, the date Congress selected for terminating this class of deductions. 26 U.S.C. § 264, 26 U.S.C.A § 264. The insurance company existed; it operated under Texas law; it was authorized to issue these policies and to make these annuity loans. While the taxpayer was obligated to pay interest at the rate of 3 1/2% per annum, the annuity bonds increased in cash value at the rate of only 2 1/2% per annum. The insurance company's profit was in that 1-point spread.
Tax avoidance is a dominating motive behind scores of transactions. It is plainly present here. Will the Service that calls this transaction a 'sham' today not press for collection of taxes arising out of the surrender of the annuity contract? I think it should, for I do not believe any part of the transaction was a 'sham.' To disallow the 'interest' deduction because the annuity device was devoid of commercial substance is to draw a line which will affect a host of situations now now before us and which, with all deference, I do not think we can maintain when other cases reach here. The remedy is legislative. Evils or abuses can be particularized by Congress. We deal only with 'interest' as commonly understood and as used across the board in myriad transactions. Since these transactions were real and legitimate in the insurance world and were consummated within the limits allowed by insurance policies, I would recognize them tax-wise.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Knewel v. Egan

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
268 U.S. 442
Knewel v. Egan
Argued: April 2, 1925. --- Decided: May 25, 1925
Mr. Byron S. Payne, of Pierre, S. D., for appellant.
Mr. George W. Egan, of Sioux Falls, S. D., pro se.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# L. 1939 c. 19599 (Florida)

* information about this edition.
* related portals: Florida.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
CHAPTER 19599--(No. 604).
HOUSE BILL NO. 1246
AN ACT to Declare and Designate and Establish a Certain State Road in Broward County, Florida.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
Section 1. That the following named, described and designated road be and is hereby declared, designated and established as a State Road of the system of State Roads of this State, to wit:
A road beginning at the point where Hollywood Boulevard intersects State Road 140, thence westerly along said Boulevard crossing State Road 4 at Harding Circle in Hollywood, Broward County, Florida, thence westerly along a continuation of said Boulevard across State Road 149, thence westerly to intersect State Road 26, being wholly within Broward County, Florida.
Section 2. That all laws and parts of laws in conflict with, be and the same are hereby repealed.
Section 3. That this Act shall take effect upon its passage and apoproval by the Governor, or by its becoming a law without such approval.
Became a law without the Governor's approval.
Filed in Office Secretary of State, June 12, 1939.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# L. 1937 c. 18254 (Florida)

* information about this edition.
* related portals: Florida.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
CHAPTER 18254--(No. 548).
HOUSE BILL NO. 1264
AN ACT to Designate and Establish a Certain Road in Brevard County, Florida, as a part of the System of the State Roads of the State of Florida.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
Section 1. There is hereby designated and established a state road to be and become a part of the system of state highways of the State of Florida, a certain road designated as:
Beginning at the south end of State Road No. 206 at Georgianna, Brevard County, Florida, on Merritt Island; thence in a general southerly direction to the intersection of State Road No. 101, near Eau Gallie Beach, following in a general direction the present county road where practicable, or along the most practicable route from Georgianna to Eau Gallie Beach.
Section 2. All laws and parts of laws in conflict with the provisions of this Act be and the same are hereby repealed.
Section 3. This Act shall take effect upon its becoming a law.
Approved by the Governor May 31, 1937.
Filed in office Secretary of State June 1, 1937.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# L. 1937 c. 18255 (Florida)

* information about this edition.
* related portals: Florida.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
CHAPTER 18255--(No. 549).
HOUSE BILL NO. 1266
AN ACT to Declare, Designate and Establish a Certain State Road in Duval County, Florida.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
Section 1. That the following described road be and the same is hereby declared designated and established as a State Road of the system of State Roads of this State with all the rights and considerations of other State Roads, to-wit: Beginning at the intersection of State Road Number 78, which is also known as Atlantic Boulevard, and the abandoned Florida East Coast Railroad Right of Way, Mayport Branch in Duval County, Florida; thence running Easterly along the abandoned Florida East Coast Railroad Right of Way, Mayport Branch, to Spring Glen; thence continuing Easterly along the abandoned Florida East Coast Railroad Right of Way, Mayport Branch, crossing State Road Number 78; thence continuing Easterly through Jacksonville Beach, in Duval County, into the Ocean Beach of the Atlantic Ocean.
Section 2. That the State Road Department of the State of Florida is hereby authorized to assign an appropriate number to such road.
Section 3. This Act shall become a law upon its approval by the Governor, or upon its becoming a law without such approval.
Approved by the Governor May 31, 1937.
Filed in Office Secretary of State June 1, 1937.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# L. 1945 c. 22753 (Florida)

* information about this edition.
* related portals: Florida.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
CHAPTER 22753--(No. 239)
HOUSE BILL NO. 661
AN ACT Declaring, Designating and Establishing a Certain State Road in Orange County, Florida.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
Section 1. There is hereby declared, designated and established as a State Road in Orange County, Florida, the following:
Beginning as a point where the South boundary of N½ of SE¼ of Section 4, Township 22, Range 29E, intersects the Federal Highway 441, running thence East along said line and its extension a distance of approximately ¾ of mile until said line intersects the Old Orlando-Apopka Highway.
Section 2. That the State Road Department shall, as soon as practicable, cause the said road herein above described to be surveyed and located as a part of the State Road System of the State of Florida.
Section 3. All Laws or parts of Laws in conflict with the provisions of this Act be, and the same are hereby repealed.
Section 4. This Act shall take effect immediately upon its becoming a Law.
Became a law without the Governor's approval.
Filed in Office Secretary of State, May 30, 1945.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# L. 1937 c. 18265 (Florida)

* information about this edition.
* related portals: Florida.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
CHAPTER 18265--(No. 559).
HOUSE BILL NO. 1649
AN ACT to Declare, Designate and Establish a State Road in Hillsborough County, Florida.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
Section 1. That there is hereby established, declared and established a State road to be a part of the system of the State roads of the State of Florida and under the jurisdiction and control of the State Road Department of the State of Florida, beginning at the State system of roads in the City of Tampa and running along the most practical route to where Bay-to-Bay Boulevard, intersects the Atlantic Coast Line Railway tracks, thence parallel with said tracks to the City of Port Tampa; thence along the most practical route to the ship terminal at Port Tampa; the number of said road to be designated by the State Road Department.
Section 2. This Act shall take effect upon its passage by the Legislature and approval by the Governor or becoming a law without such approval.
Approved by the Governor May 31, 1937.
Filed in Office Secretary of State June 1, 1937.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# L. 1939 c. 19251 (Florida)

* information about this edition.
* related portals: Florida.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
CHAPTER 19251--(No. 256).
SENATE BILL NO. 247
AN ACT Designating and Establishing a State Road to Be Known as State Road 8-A, Extending From State Road 2 at Leesburg via Haines City, Avon Park, Moore Haven to Clewiston.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
Section 1. That there is hereby designated and established as State Road 8-A, a road extending from State Road No. 2 at Leesburg via Haines City, Avon Park, Moore Haven to Clewiston.
Section 2. That the establishment of said road shall not have the effect of abolishing or discontinuing any part of State Road 8; provided, however, the State Road Department may survey and locate the line of route of said State Road 8-A, along coincident or parallel to any part of State Road 8.
Section 3. This Act shall take effect immediately upon its becoming a law.
Approved by the Governor, June 5, 1939.
Files in Office Secretary of State, June 5, 1939.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# L. 1939 c. 19598 (Florida)

* information about this edition.
* related portals: Florida.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
CHAPTER 19598--(No. 603).
HOUSE BILL NO. 1243
AN ACT to Declare and Designate and Establish a Certain State Road in Broward County, Florida.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
Section 1. That the following named, described and designated road be and is hereby declared, designated and established as a State Road of the system of State Roads of this State, to wit:
A road now in use known as Flamingo Road commencing at a point between Sections 11 and 12, Township 50 South, Range 40 East, on State Road 26, in Broward County, Florida, thence running about 8.2 miles in a southerly direction and intersecting with a paved road known as Hollywood Boulevard, said road being located on the quarter section line, Section 13, Township 51 South, Range 40 East, and wholly within Broward County, Florida.
Section 2. That all laws and parts of laws in conflict with, be and the same are hereby repealed.
Section 3. That this Act shall take effect upon its passage and apoproval by the Governor, or by its becoming a law without such approval.
Became a law without the Governor's approval.
Filed in Office Secretary of State, June 12, 1939.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse