OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Diary of One Month in Honolulu/Day 20

Went to church this morning, and early this afternoon we took an automobile and went up the Pacific Heights road. I have run out of adjectives when it comes to talking about the views here; but I would like to see a sunset from up there.
We went prepared for tramping and sent the car away, telling the chauffeur to come back for us late in the afternoon, up Pauoa Valley, and then we tramped off along the ridge trail. We could have walked up from the trolley, but Jack is a great hand to start on a trail fresh.
It was a glorious tramp along the narrow ridge, with Nuuanu Valley straight down on one side and Pauoa Valley straight down on the other. The trail keeps to the top of the ridge clear back to the Pauoa Flats, and the forest that we passed through was wonderful, and though there were plenty of ups and downs, there were no bad spots at all and we made very good time, reaching the valley before the motor got there. The trail was just as beautiful as we imagined it would be, when we looked up at it from the road to the Pali.
I'm glad I can tramp.
# Diary of One Month in Honolulu/Day 21

Sat under the hau tree and read this morning and watched Jack and his surf-board. Really, he is doing finely.
This afternoon we went to the Country Club for golf, and had tea there—particularly good tea. Jack found some friends and got some more information. He is using so many Hawaiian words now that I am going to have to attach a glossary to him to find out what his conversation is about. When he says "wikiwiki," I don't know whether he wants me to stop talking or come to dinner.
Played bridge again this evening. There are always people who want us to play bridge, but in a place like this it seems such a waste of time.
The fruits here are perfectly delicious. I didn't know that pineapple could be so good, and the mangoes and papaia are the joy of my life; and think of strawberries and grapes growing and fruiting at the same time in the same garden! Jack has got the poi habit. I like baked breadfruit better.
# Diary of One Month in Honolulu/Day 24

Jack went shark fishing today, and they got a shark. They went out in a gasoline launch and towed something dead for bait, and then, when the shark came close enough, they harpooned him. I won't say how long he was, for I didn't see him, and I don't like to give figures on hearsay evidence. Jack thought he had a fine time.
I spent the day writing letters and sorting the shells I found at Koko Crater and sending some little boxes of them to the folks back home. There's another boat out tomorrow.
This evening we took the trolley and went out to see Moanalua by moonlight. It is a perfect dreamland of beauty. No one ever painted anything half so lovely as the palm silhouettes against the sky, and the gloss of the moonlight on the cocoanut leaves. It was light enough to read ordinary print, if you strained your eyes a little.
Saw my first lunar rainbow. It was much more brilliant than I expected.
# Diary of One Month in Honolulu/Day 26

We are at Hauula. Came out on the train this morning. Of course, that was the long way around, but we love the trip along the ragged coast, and, besides, we wanted to stay over night. It would have been only about thirty miles by motor, and we could have seen the sacred gorge and returned the same day; but after my glimpse from the Pali by moonlight, I wanted to see this craggy side of the Island with the moon on it—and it is splendid tonight. We have been walking along the beach and watching the surf and the tiny islets and looking up at the overshadowing mountains. It is all a dream-country by moonlight.
Either we arrived with big appetites or else the food here is the best that ever happened. Jack said it was a little of both, but it looked to me more like a good deal of both. I think that he would have been poetical tonight if he hadn't eaten so much. He almost was, anyway.
# Diary of One Month in Honolulu/Day 19

Missed my swim in order to go to the fishmarket early this morning, it being Saturday. It was truly a sight. I'm glad that the colors cook out of the fish, for I never could eat one of those gorgeous creatures—it would be like eating a humming bird. There is surely a Bedlam of tongues there, and a medley of garb. I could scarcely get Jack away.
After that we browsed in the Oriental part of town—in queer little Chinese and Japanese shops where they sell everything on earth that Chinese or Japanese eat or wear or look at, and a lot of things that wouldn't seem to be intended for either purpose. I bought so many little contraptions that Jack had to drag me out of the district by main force in order to keep car-fare in his pocket, he said; but, after all, we had lunch down town and then, just for fun, took a carriage back to the hotel, driving out the Ala Moana along the beach almost all the way, instead of by the usual route. It was lovely.
Played bridge in the evening.
# Diary of One Month in Honolulu/Day 22

Went down town shopping this morning and bought some perfectly beautiful embroideries and laces. The little shops where they keep those things are irresistible. I wasn't nearly through—but my pocketbook was—when I had to meet Jack for luncheon. I am having some frocks made by a Chinaman, too, at such a low price that Jack wants to come here to live.
After luncheon we motored out to Pearl Harbor and went over the Naval Station. Saw the divers at work at the drydocks, and Jack learned all about dredging and construction and a lot of other things. Then, as we were wise enough to have gotten a permit, we went to the mouth of Pearl Harbor and looked through the fortifications, called Fort Kamehameha. Jack says that the work done and planned out there is tremendous. We might have gone from Honolulu by railroad to Puuloa and then taken a hack over the ground, but didn't know it until afterward. But that way we would have missed some beautiful road and curious foreign settlements.
This evening wrote letters for tomorrow's boat.
# Diary of One Month in Honolulu/Day 25

Went over a lot of settlement and kindergarten work this morning and found it intensely interesting. They are doing splendid betterment work here. Jack played golf.
Took luncheon down town and then went to the Bishop Museum. I don't see why we didn't go there sooner. We ought to spend a week there, instead of half a day—and our month in Honolulu is almost up. I don't know where the time has gone, but it has been "chuck full" every minute. I was never more interested in my life than in those wonderful old Hawaiian relics; and the amount of knowledge that Jack acquired is appalling. I must get out there again if I possibly can.
This evening we motored to the Pali for a moonlight view. It is a picture to put into my memory beside the one of Moanalua by moonlight. I didn't know that the world could be so beautiful.
# Diary of One Month in Honolulu/Day 27

Went up the Kaliuwaa Gorge this morning. That is what we came here for. It is called "the sacred gorge," and is just a crack in the mountains, a mile or so long and with green walls several thousand feet high. There is a little stream, and the trail crosses it, back and forth, all the way up. It is a weird place, and there are weird legends hanging over it, and everyone who goes up the trail must place two crossed ohia leaves pointing up the gorge, if the powers that be are to permit him to reach his destination in safety. And these crossed leaves, some fresh and some withered, lie all along the way, held in place by little pebbles.
At the upper end a waterfall jets out from a narrow crevice, high up in the mountain, and falls sheer into a broad, deep black pool with strangely water-carved walls, and great wet ferns and long vines swinging out from the dripping niches. There is a curious bare mark on one of the perpendicular mountain sides, where a giant demi-god of the old days dragged up a canoe of thirty-foot beam.
Back to Honolulu this afternoon We were going to the Japanese theater this evening, but I couldn't go in out of the moonlight.
# DeJoseph v. Connecticut/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
385 U.S. 982
DeJoseph v. Connecticut
This case illustrates, in even more compelling terms than Winters v. Beck, 385 U.S. 907, 87 S.Ct. 207, 17 L.Ed.2d 137, the need for this Court to make clear the meaning of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799.
The petitioner was charged in a Connecticut court with criminal nonsupport, a misdemeanor under Connecticut law punishable by imprisonment of up to a year. At his arraignment he told the judge that he was indigent, and requested that counsel be appointed. The judge informed him that appointment of counsel was not possible because the charge was only a misdemeanor. At trial, the petitioner again indicated that he wanted counsel, but his request was ignored by the trial judge. He attempted to conduct his own defense, and was convicted and sentenced to six months in jail. The conviction was affirmed by the Appellate Division of the Connecticut Circuit Court. That court noted that the petitioner had failed to request findings on the issue of his indigency, as required by local practice rules, and held that without more proof of indigency he could not claim that he had been deprived of any right to appointed counsel. Clearly, constitutional claims cannot be blocked by such procedural obstacles, in a case where the defendant, appearing alone in court, saw his requests for counsel denied outright by one judge and totally ignored by another.
The petitioner's conviction in this case is squarely at odds with the decision of the Federal District Court for the District of Connecticut in Arbo v. Hegstrom, 261 F.Supp. 397 (Civil No. 11,340, decided June 16, 1966). Arbo was charged in Connecticut with criminal nonsupport, the identical offense with which the petitioner here was charged and convicted. Unlike the petitioner, Arbo pleaded guilty and never requested that counsel be appointed for him. Nevertheless, the Federal District Judge held that Gideon guaranteed Arbo the right to appointed counsel. Arbo's conviction was set aside because he had not been told of his right to counsel, and the State has not appealed.
Arbo was set free. The petitioner, convicted of the same offense in the same State, remains in jail. When the meaning of a fundamental constitutional right depends on which court in Connecticut a person turns to for redress, I believe it is time for this Court to intervene. I would grant certiorari and set this case for argument.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# DeStefano v. Woods/Dissent Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Douglas
United States Supreme Court
392 U.S. 631
DeStefano v. Woods
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, with whom Mr. Justice BLACK joins, dissenting.
I am of the view that the deprivation of the right to a trial by jury should be given retroactive effect, as I thought should have been done with comparable constitutional decisions. See Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799; Douglas v. People of State of California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811; Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618, 640, 85 S.Ct. 1731, 1743, 14 L.Ed.2d 601 (dissenting opinion); Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 736, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 1782, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (dissenting opinion); Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 302, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 1972, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (dissenting opinion).

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# DeGregory v. Attorney General of New Hampshire

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
383 U.S. 825
Hugo DeGREGORY, Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.
Argued: Feb. 24, 1966. --- Decided: April 4, 1966
Howard S. Whiteside, Boston, Mass., for appellant.
R. Peter Shapiro, Concord, N.H., for appellee.
Opinion of the Court by Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, announced by Mr. Justice BRENNAN.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# DeCesare v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
390 U.S. 200
DeCesare v. United States
The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments of the courts below are vacated, and the cases are remanded for further consideration in the light of Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39, 88 S.Ct. 697, 716, 19 L.Ed.2d 889. See also 28 U.S.C. § 2106 and Grosso v. United States, 390 U.S. 62, 88 S.Ct. 709, 19 L.Ed.2d 906.
Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of Nos. 11, 17, 19, 24, 30, and 45.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# DeJoseph v. Connecticut

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
385 U.S. 982
DeJoseph v. Connecticut
William D. Graham, for petitioner.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut and/or the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court of Connecticut denied. Dissenting opinion by Mr. Justice Stewart with whom Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas join.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# DeStefano v. Woods

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
392 U.S. 631
DeStefano v. Woods, Sheriff
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
No. 559. Argued: N/A --- Decided: June 17, 1968.
In post-conviction proceedings petitioners unsuccessfully challenged the constitutional validity of their convictions in the state courts—petitioner in No. 941 contending that it was unconstitutional for the trial court to have instructed the jury (under a state constitutional provision applicable to noncapital cases) that it could return a guilty verdict by less than a unanimous vote; and petitioner in No. 559 contending that he was unconstitutionally denied a trial by jury when he was tried by a state court for criminal contempt, adjudged guilty, and sentenced to three concurrent one-year terms.
Held: This Court's decisions of May 20, 1968, in Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, holding that the States cannot deny a request for jury trial in serious criminal cases, and Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194, holding that the right to jury trial extends to trials for serious criminal contempts, do not apply retroactively; and since petitioners' trials were instituted before that date the Court does not reach the issues presented by petitioners.
Certiorari granted; No. 559, 382 F. 2d 557, and No. 941, affirmed.
Anna R. Lavin for petitioner in No. 559.
John J. Stamos and Elmer C. Kissane for respondent in No. 559.
Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and David H. Blunt, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent in No. 941.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

* ↑ Together with No. 941, Carcerano v. Gladden, Warden, on petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oregon.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# DeCesare v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
390 U.S. 200
DeCesare et al. v. United States
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
No. 11. Argued: N/A --- Decided: March 4, 1968
Certiorari granted; No. 11, 356 F. 2d 107; No. 17, 361 F. 2d 220; No. 19, 363 F. 2d 374; No. 24, 366 F. 2d 770; No. 30, 368 F. 2d 692; No. 45, 369 F. 2d 106; and No. 567, 375 F. 2d 1012, vacated and remanded.
Allen David Stolar for petitioners in No. 11. Newton B. Schwartz for petitioner in No. 17. Ollie Lancaster,Jr., for petitioners in No. 19. Francis L. Giordano for petitioner in No. 24. Patrick T. McGahn, Jr., for petitioner in No. 30. Robert J. O'Hanlon and Richard L. Daly for petitioner in No. 45. B. Clarence Mayfield for petitioner in No. 567.
Solicitor General Marshall for the United States in No. 11. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States in No. 17. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Miss Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States in Nos. 19 and 30. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Miss Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States in No. 24. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Miss Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States in No. 45. Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Miss Rosenberg for the United States in No. 567.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

* ↑ Together with No. 17, Butler v. United States; No. 19, Brazzell et al. v. United States; No. 24, Rosenzweig v. United States; No. 30, Augello v. United States; No. 45, Gennaro v. United States; and No. 567, Mutcherson v. United States, all on petitions for writs of certiorari. Nos. 17, 19, and 567 are to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 24 to the Second Circuit, No. 30 to the Third Circuit, and No. 45 to the Eighth Circuit.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# DeVries v. Evening Journal Association

* related portals: New Jersey case law.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
DeVries v. Evening Journal Association, 9 N.J. 117, 87 A.2d 317 (1952), is a New Jersey Supreme Court case which held that so long as negotiations on material terms continue, there has been no agreement to form a contract.
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
* Wikipedia article
Supreme Court of New Jersey
9 N.J. 117
DE VRIES v. EVENING JOURNAL ASS'N.
No. No. A-79 Argued: Feb. 18, 1952 --- Decided: March 17, 1952
Eli deVries, individually and trading as E. deVries Company, brought action against the Evening Journal Association, a corporation of New Jersey, to recover damages for anticipatory breach of an alleged oral contract for purchase of newsprint to be delivered in the future. The Superior Court, Law Division, entered judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Division. Before the appeal was reached for argument in the Appellate Division the cause was certified to the Supreme Court on its own motion. The Supreme Court, Oliphant, J., held that evidence sustained finding that no contract existed between the parties.
Judgment affirmed.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Senecio, Claudius

​SENE′CIO, CLAU′DIUS, a favourite of Nero at the commencement of his reign, was the son of a freedman of the emperor. (Tac. Ann. xiii. 12.)
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Silanus, Junius 9.

D. JUNIUS SILANUS, a brother of No. 8, was one of the paramours of Julia, the granddaughter of Augustus, and voluntarily withdrew into exile when the adulteries of Julia were discovered. Tiberius allowed him to return to Rome in A.D. 20 on the intercession of his brother Marcus, but did not advance him to any of the honors of the state. (Tac. Ann. iii. 24.)
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Sofonius Tigellinus

SOFO'NIUS TIGELLI'NUS. [Tigellinus.]
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Silanus, Junius 2.

D. JUNIUS SILANUS, was commissioned by the senate about B.C. 146, in consequence of his knowledge of Punic language, to translate into Latin the twenty-eight books of Mago on Agriculture. (Plin. H. N. xviii. 3. s. 5.)
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Silanus, Junius 7.

C. JUNIUS C. F. SILANUS, consul B.C. 19 with C. Furnius, may perhaps have been a cousin of No. 6. (Dion Cass. liv. 18.)
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Semus

​SEMUS (Σῆμος), a Greek grammarian of uncertain date, wrote, according to Suidas (s. v.), eight books on Delos, two books of TrepioSoi, one on Paros, one on Pergamus, and a work on Paeans. Suidas calls him an Elean, but it appears from Athenaeus (iii. p. 123, d.) that this is a mistake, and that he was a native of Delos. His work on Delos (ArjAiaKd or A-qXids) Avas the most im- portant, and is frequently referred to by Athenaeus, and once or twice by other writers (Athen. iii. p. 109, f., iv. p. 173, e., viii. pp. 331, f,, 335, a., xi. p. 469, c, xiv. pp. 614, a., 637, b., 645, b., xv. p. 676., f. ; Steph. Byz. s.v. Teyvpa ; Etym. Magn, s. V. Bi€Aiuos). Athenaeus also quotes (xiv. pp. 618, d., 622, a — d.) his work on Paeans (irepl Tratduwu). We likewise find in Athenaeus (iii. p. 123, d.), a reference to a work of Semus on Islands (N77«nds), but it has been suggested with much probability that this is a false reading for ArjAjcts. (Vossius, De Histor. Graecis, p. 497, ed. Wester- mann.)
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Silanus, Junius 14.

D. JUNIUS TORQUATUS SILANUS, probably also a son of No. 11, was consul under Claudius A.D. 53 with Q. Haterius Antoninus. He was compelled by Nero in A.D. 64 to put an end to his life, because he had boasted of being descended from Augustus. Tacitus says that he had boasted of Augustus being his atavus; but if he was really the abnepos of Augustus, the latter was his abavus and not his atavus. (Tac. Ann. xii. 58, xv. 35; Dion Cass. lxii. 27.)
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Sogdianus

SOGDIA'NUS (Σογδιανός) or SECUNDIA'NUS (Σεκυνδιανός), as he is called by Ctesias, was one of the illegitimate sons of Artaxerxes I. Longimanus. The latter on his death in B. C. 425 was succeeded by legitimate son Xerxes II., but this monarch after a reign of only two months was murdered by Sogdianus, who now became king. Sogdianus, however, was murdered in his turn after a reign of seven months, by his brother Ochus, as is related in the life of the latter. Ochus reigned under the name of Dareius II. [Dareius II.] (Diod. xii. 71; Ctesias Pers. c. 44.)