OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Aviation Accident Report: Pennsylvania Central Airlines Flight 19/Appendix A

APPENDIX A
The following passengers were on board the airplane at the time of the accident:
Miss Dorothy Boer, 106 Maple Avenue, Abingdon, Illinois
Mr. E. G. Bowler, 245 Ashland Avenue, Mt. Lebanon, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Mr. W. M. Burleson, 57 Look Lone Road, Richmond, Virginia
Mr. W. B. Chambers, 17 Craighead Road, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Miss Mildred Chesser, Mineral, Ohio
Dr. Charles D. C. Cole 5305 41st Street, N. W., Washington, D. C.
Miss Naomi Colpo, 3621 Newark Street, N. W., Washington, D. C.
Mr. A. E. Elliott, 3757 McKinley Street, N. W., Washington, D. C.
Mr. William Garbose, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
Miss Evelyn Goldsmith, 5847 Douglas Street, Pittsburgh, Pa.
Mrs. Rose Z. Hale, Pennsylvania Apartments, 4403 Center Ave., Pittsburgh, Pa.
Mr. Arthur Hollaway, 838 N.E. 24th Street, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Mr. H. J. Hofferth, 5531 N. Spalding, Chicago, Illinois
Mr. D. P. James, 1212 Lee Street, Jefferson City, Missouri
Senator Ernest E. Lundeen, 6221 29th Street, N. W., Washington, D. C.
Mr. M. P. Mahan, 1610 Grandville Avenue, Chicago, Illinois
Mr. Adolph Nook, 1788 Lanier Place, Washington D. C.
Mr. Joseph J. Pesci, 213 West Market Street, Blairsville, Pa.
Miss Chloe Post, Minerva, Ohio
Mr. E. J. Tarr, 1722 19th Street, N. W., Washington, D. C.
Miss Margaret Turner, Huddleston, Virginia
oooo000oooo
# Anti-Thelyphthora

* related portals: Polygamy.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Satirical attack against the Thelyphthora defence of polygamy

## Original references

* ↑ When a knight was degraded, his spurs were chopped off.—C
* ↑ Monthly Keriew for October.—C.
* ↑ On this line, Southey remarks—"This is one of the instances in which Cowper's remembrance of a passage in Milton has betrayed him into an inexact use of a word in it:— "He through the armed files Darts his experienced eye." Pas. Lost, i. 569.
* ↑ Rev. Robert Aris Willmott said in his 1866 collection of Cowper's works, "I am quite unable to discover the incorrectness specified. The knight darting his eye through the bars of his helmet, is surely in harmony with the manners of chivalry; and the expression is clear and distinct."
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Anti-secession Resolutions of the New York Legislature

11 January 1861
Whereas, The insurgent State of South Carolina, after seizing the Post-offices, Custom-House, moneys and fortifications of the Federal Government, has, by firing into a vessel ordered by the Government to convey troops and provisions to Fort Sumter, virtually declared war; and
Whereas, The forts and property of the United States Government in Georgia, Alabama, and Louisiana have been unlawfully seized, with hostile intentions; and
Whereas, Their Senators in Congress avow and maintain their treasonable acts; therefore,
Resolved, (if the Senate concur,) That the Legislature of New York is profoundly impressed with the value of the Union, and determined to preserve it unimpaired; that it greets with joy the recent firm, dignified and patriotic Special Message of the President of the United States, and that we tender to him through the Chief Magistrate of our own State, whatever aid in men and money may be required to enable him to enforce the laws and uphold the authority of the Federal Government; and that, in the defence of the Union, which has conferred prosperity and happiness upon the American people, renewing the pledge given and redeemed by our fathers, we are ready to devote our fortunes, our lives, and our sacred honor.
Resolved, (if the Senate concur,) That the Union-loving citizens and representatives of Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, Kentucky, Missouri, and Tennessee, who labor with devoted courage and patriotism to withhold their States from the vortex of secession, are entitled to the gratitude and admiration of the whole people.
Resolved, (if the Senate concur,) That the Government be respectfully requested to forward, forthwith, copies of the foregoing resolutions to the President of the Nation, and the Governors of all the States of the Union.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published in 1861, before the cutoff of January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Antic Hay

Antic Hay is a comic novel by Aldous Huxley, published in 1923. The story takes place in London, and depicts the aimless or self-absorbed cultural elite in the sad and turbulent times following the end of World War I.
ANTIC HAY
by
ALDOUS HUXLEY
CHATTO AND WINDUS
LONDON
First published November 1923
Printed in Great Britain; all rights reserved
My men like satyrs grazing on the lawns
Shall with their goat-feet dance the antic hay.
Marlowe
CHAPTER I
CHAPTER II
CHAPTER III
CHAPTER IV
CHAPTER V
CHAPTER VI
CHAPTER VII
CHAPTER VIII
CHAPTER IX
CHAPTER X
CHAPTER XI
CHAPTER XII
CHAPTER XIII
CHAPTER XIV
CHAPTER XV
CHAPTER XVI
CHAPTER XVII
CHAPTER XVIII
CHAPTER XIX
CHAPTER XX
CHAPTER XXI
CHAPTER XXII
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1963, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 60 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bartone v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Clark
United States Supreme Court
375 U.S. 52
Bartone v. United States
Argued: Oct. 28, 1963. ---
Although there were other questions before the Court of Appeals, the sole question presented by this petition is stated as follows:
'May a United States District Judge orally revoke the probation of a Defendant in open court and in the presence of the Defendant and his counsel and impose a sentence of confinement for a specific period of time and thereafter enter a formal written judgment and commitment in which a larger and longer sentence of confinement is imposed and set forth?'
It appears that on September 14, 1962, petitioner and his counsel appeared in the District Court, at which time a sentence of confinement of one year was imposed. Subsequently, and in petitioner's absence, the court enlarged the penalty by one day.
The propriety of this enlargement of the sentence, along with other questions, was presented on the appeal to the Court of Appeals, which made no mention of it in its opinion. 317 F.2d 608. The Court of Appeals did, however, deny a motion of the United States to remand the cause for the purpose of correcting the sentence-relief to which the United States concedes petitioner is entitled. See Rakes v. United States, 4th Cir., 309 F.2d 686. The only question is whether the error will be corrected here and now or whether petitioner will be remitted to his remedy under Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure; and whether petitioner will be advantaged by one procedure or another is not our concern.
This error, in enlarging the sentence in the absence of petitioner, was so plain in light of the requirements of Rule 43 that it should have been dealt with by the Court of Appeals, even though it had not been alleged as error.
As seen from our Miscellaneous Docket for 1962, the use of collateral proceedings for relief from federal judgments of conviction is considerable:
OCTOBER TERM, 1962. — MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET.
Totals.
Where state procedural snarls or obstacles preclude an effective state remedy against unconstitutional convictions, federal courts have no other choice but to grant relief in the collateral proceeding. See Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837. But the situation is different in federal proceedings, over which both the Courts of Appeals and this Court (McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332, 63 S.Ct. 608, 87 L.Ed. 819) have broad powers of supervision. It is more appropriate, whenever possible, to correct errors reachable by the appeal rather than remit the parties to a new collateral proceeding.
We grant certiorari and reverse the judgment denying correction of the sentence.
Mr. Justice CLARK, with whom Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice STEWART join, dissenting.

## Notes

* ↑ Rule 43 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provides:
* ↑ Supra, note 1.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barwise v. Sheppard

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
299 U.S. 33
Barwise v. Sheppard
Argued: Oct. 13, 1936. --- Decided: Nov 9, 1936
Appeal from the Court of Civil Appeals, Third Supreme Judicial District, State of Texas.
Mr. Wm. R. Watkins, of Fort Worth, Tex., for appellants.
Messrs. Wm. McCrew, Atty. Gen., and Scott Gaines, Llewellyn Duke and H. Grady Chandler, all of Austin, Tex., for appellees.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baruch (Bible)

Baruch is a book of the Hebrew Bible. It is accepted as canonical by Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Christians, but excluded as apocryphal by Protestant Christians and Jews. In the Catholic Canon, Baruch includes the Letter of Jeremiah; in the Eastern Orthodox canon, the Letter of Jeremiah is a separate book.
English-language translations of Barouch include:
* "Baruk" in the Wycliffe version of the Bible (1380s)
* "Barruch" in the Douay-Rheims version (1610)
* "Baruch with the Epistle of Ieremiah" in the Authorized Version (1611)
* "Baruch" in the King James version (1769)
* "Baruch" in the World English version (in progress since 1997)
* "Baruch" in the Wikisource version (in progress since 2006)
# Base-Ball Ballads/"The Major Leaguer's Daughter; Or, The Turning of the Tide"

"THE MAJOR LEAGUER'S DAUGHTER;" OR, "THE TURNING OF THE TIDE."
(Up to the hour of going to press the music of this soon-to-be popular ballad had not been written. The sport department office boy was out at the time, while the janitor was busy; so any who peruse it must compose their own music to the selection.)
So Tom, he passed her up for good, and now she wonders why Them cruel words unto him once she said.
# Bartram v. Robertson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
122 U.S. 116
Bartram v. Robertson
H. E. Tremaine, M. W. Tyler, and A. J. Willard, for plaintiffs in error.
Sol. Gen. Jenks, for defendant in error.
FIELD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Base-Ball Ballads

BASE-BALL BALLADS By GRANTLAND RICE Sporting Editor the Nashville Tennessean
Illustrated by C. H. WELLINGTON
THE TENNESSEAN COMPANY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE
Copyright, 1910, by The Tennessean Company.
DEDICATED TO THE FAN
CONTENTS.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baruch

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Baruch."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* A book of the Hebrew Bible; for versions, see Baruch (Bible).
* Biblical commentary and analysis
** "Baruch," in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
** "Baruch," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
# Bag-Wig and the Tobacco-Pipe

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
From Fables.
* The BAG-WIG and the TOBACCO-PIPE.
* FABLE XVI.
* A Bag-wig of a jauntee air,
* Trick'd up with all a barber's care,
* Loaded with powder and perfume,
* Hung in a spendthrift's dressing-room;
* 5 Close by its side, by chance convey'd,
* A black Tobacco-pipe was laid;
* And with its vapours far and near,
* Outstunk the essence of Monsieur;
* At which its rage, the thing of hair,
* 10 Thus, bristling up, began declare.
* "Bak'd dirt! that with intrusion rude
* Breakst in upon my solitude,
* And whose offensive breath defiles
* The air for forty thousand miles —
* 15 Avaunt-pollution's in thy touch —
* O barb'rous English! horrid Dutch!
* I cannot bear it — Here, Sue, Nan,
* Go call the maid to call the man,
* And bid him come without delay,
* 20 To take this odious pipe away.
* Hideous! sure some one smoak'd thee, Friend,
* Reversely, at his t'other end.
* Oh! what mix'd odours! what a throng
* Of salt and sour, of stale and strong!
* 25 A most unnatural combination,
* Enough to mar all perspiration —
* Monstrous! again — 'twou'd vex a saint!
* Susan, the drops — or else I faint!"
* The pipe (for 'twas a pipe of soul)
* 30 Raising himself upon his bole,
* In smoke, like oracle of old,
* Did thus his sentiments unfold.
* "Why, what's the matter, Goodman Swagger,
* Thou flaunting French, fantastic bragger?
* 35 Whose whole fine speech is (with a pox)
* Ridiculous and heterodox.
* 'Twas better for the English nation
* Before such scoundrels came in fashion,
* When none sought hair in realms unknown,
* 40 But every blockhead bore his own.
* Know, puppy, I'm an English pipe,
* Deem'd worthy of each Briton's gripe,
* Who, with my cloud-compelling aid
* Help our plantations and our trade,
* 45 And am, when sober and when mellow,
* An upright, downright, honest fellow.
* Tho' fools, like you, may think me rough,
* And scorn me, 'cause I am in buff,
* Yet your contempt I glad receive,
* 50 'Tis all the fame that you can give:
* None finery or fopp'ry prize;
* But they who've something to disguise;
* For simple nature hates abuse,
* And Plainness is the dress of Use." 1750

## Notes

First published in The Midwife; or The Old Woman's Magazine (i. 120-2, Dec. 1750). Reprinted 1752, 1763, 1791
* ↑ 13. And with thy fetid breath defiles (Text 1752).

## Links

* on "books.google.co.uk" (1)
* on "books.google.co.uk" (2)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bag and Baggage

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
London: Constable and Company Ltd., 1913. Accompanying illustrations omitted.
BAG AND BAGGAGE
BY THE SAME AUTHOR
JESSIE BAZLEY
Truth says:—"Dignified, passionate, and full of insight."
"Told with all the cunning of a fine artist."—Pall Mall Gazette.
"Compels attention."—Morning Post.
"The book undoubtedly will satisfy many readers."—Globe.
BAG AND BAGGAGE
BY
BERNARD CAPES
AUTHOR OF "LOAVES AND FISHES," "PLOTS," "FROM DOOR TO DOOR," "AT A WINTER'S FIRE" ETC.
LONDON
CONSTABLE AND COMPANY LTD. 1913
A number of these stories first appeared in the following magazines: the London, the Lady's Realm, the Windsor, the Pall Mall, Cassell's, the Illustrated London News, to whose editors the author's best acknowledgments are here rendered.

### CONTENTS

FROM GRAVE
* PAGE
* "The Soft Seraphic Screen" 3
* "Beneath Dark Wings" 41
* John Darling's Atonement 119
* The King's Star 141
* Tony's Drum 170
* John Field's Return 189
* The Corner House 207
* The Hamadryad 227
* The Voice 238
* The Poison Bottle 245
* Camilla 259
* TO GAY
* An Anonymous Letter 279
* A Double Pretender 298
* Bullet-Proof 313
* Priscilla Pipkin 320
* The Man who had Dined Too Well 331
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baer v. Moran Brothers Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
153 U.S. 287
Baer v. Moran Brothers Company
T. H. N. McPherson, John H. Mitchell, and M. L. Baer, for plaintiff in error.
Joseph H. Parsons, W. C. Jones, Atty. Gen., John P. Fay, S. F. Phillips, and Frederick D. McKenney, filed briefs in behalf of interested parties by leave of court.
Mr. Justice BREWER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barton 11 v. Sentner

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
353 U.S. 963
Barton 11 v. Sentner
Antonia SENTNER, appellant,
v.
Lewis D. BARTON, District Director, United States
Immigration and Naturalization Service, District No. 11.
No. 784. Supreme Court of the United States
May 20, 1957
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney, and Beatrice Rosenberg, for Barton.
Mr. Sydney L. Berger, for Sentner.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barton v. Barbour

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Miller
United States Supreme Court
104 U.S. 126
Barton v. Barbour
ERROR to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Saul S. Henkle for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. Linden Kent, contra.
MR. JUSTICE WOODS delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barton v. District Court of Iowa/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
371 U.S. 15
Barton v. District Court of Iowa
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barton v. District Court of Iowa

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
371 U.S. 15
Barton v. District Court of Iowa
Barton, pro se.
Evan Hultman, Atty. Gen. of Iowa, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bartlett v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
197 U.S. 230
Bartlett v. United States
Argued: February 27, 1905. --- Decided: March 13, 1905
Mr. J. M. Vale for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 230-231 intentionally omitted]
Assistant Attorney General Pradt and Mr. Frederick DeC. Faust for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 231-232 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barton 11 v. Sentner/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
353 U.S. 963
Barton 11 v. Sentner
The judgment is affirmed. See United States v. Witkovich, 353 U.S. 194, 77 S.Ct. 779.
They would note jurisdiction of this appeal and afford the Attorney General an apportunity to present the Government's side of this important internal security problem. United States v. Witkovich, supra, in which they dissented, limited § 242(d)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 66 Stat. 211, as amended, 8 U.S.C. (Supp. IV) § 1252(d)(3), 8 U.S.C.A. § 1252(d)(3), 'to authorizing all questions reasonably calculated to keep the Attorney General Advised regarding the continued availability for departure of aliens * * *.' It passed on clause (3) and no other. This appeal involves other clauses of § 242(d), namely, clauses (1) and (4), neither of which was passed on in Witkovich. The Court, by summary affirmance of this appeal, without argument, enlarges its holding in Witkovich and strikes down two more clauses of § 242(d). These two clauses are vital to the effectuation of the purpose of the Congress in controlling subversives whose ordered deportation has been forestalled by technical difficulties. For a more detailed discussion see their dissent in Witkovich.
Mr. Justice BURTON and Mr. Justice CLARK dissent.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barrett Line v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
326 U.S. 179
Barrett Line v. United States
Argued: April 2, 1945. --- Decided: June 18, 1945
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio.
Mr. Robert E. Quirk, of Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Mr. Walter J. Cummings, Jr., of Washington, D.C., for the United States and Interstate Commerce Commission.
Mr. Harry C. Ames, of Washington, D.C., for American Barge Line Co. and others.
Mr. Justice RUTLEDGE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barrett v. Failing

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
111 U.S. 523
Barrett v. Failing
W. W. Chapman, for appellant.
J. N. Dolph, for appellees.
GRAY, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barrett v. Indiana

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
229 U.S. 26
Barrett v. Indiana
Argued: April 18, 1913. --- Decided: May 26, 1913
Messrs. John C. Chaney and Charles E. Barrett for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Thomas M. Honan, Attorney General of Indiana, and Messrs. Edwin Corr, Thomas H. Branaman, and James E. McCullough for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse