OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book VII/Hymn 117 (122)

117 (122). Invitation to India.
[Atharvān̄giras.—āindram. pathyābṛhatī.]
Wanting in Pāipp. Used by Kāuç. (59. 14), with hymns 85 and 86, in a rite for welfare; and it is, with 118, reckoned (note to 25. 36) to the svastyayana gaṇa; while a schol. (note to 137. 4) adds it and 118 in the introduction to the ājyatantra; that another uses it with 116 was noted under that hymn. And Vāit. (23. 9) repeats it in the agniṣṭoma with the offering of the hāriyojanagraha.
Translated: Henry, 46, 125; Griffith, i. 384.
1. Come, O Indra, with pleasant peacock-haired bays; let not any hold thee away, as snarers a bird; go over them as [over] a waste.
The verse is RV. iii. 45. 1, found also as SV. i. 246 et al., VS. xx. 53, TA. i. 12. 2. Our (and SPP's) reading yāhí in b agrees with all these, but is against our mss. and all but two of SPP's; they leave the word unaccented. RV.VS. in c have ní, which is plainly the better reading, instead of ví; SV. has the corruption ní yemur ín ná, and TA., yet worse, nyémúr ín ná. ⌊TA. has at the end, corruptly, nidhanvéva tā́ṅ imi.⌋
# Aunt Jo's Scrap-Bag/Volume 1

Aunt Jo's Scrap-Bag.
page
LONDON: PRINTED BY SPOTTISWOODE AND CO., NEW-STREET SQUARE AND PARLIAMENT STREET
page
Aunt Jo's Scrap-Bag.
BY
LOUISA M. ALCOTT,
AUTHOR OF 'LITTLE WOMEN', 'AN OLD-FASHIONED GIRL,' 'LITTLE MEN,' 'HOSPITAL SKETCHES.'
LONDON: SAMPSON LOW, MARSTON, LOW, & SEARLE,
CROWN BUILDINGS, 188 FLEET STREET.
1871.
All rights reserved.
page
CONTENTS.
# Aunt Jo's Scrap-Bag

Collection of stories, in six volumes.
* Volume 1: MY BOYS, and other stories.
* Volume 2: SHAWL-STRAPS. Sketches of a European Trip.
* Volume 3: CUPID AND CHOW-CHOW, and other stories.
* Volume 4: MY GIRLS, and other stories.
* Volume 5: JIMMY'S CRUISE IN THE PINAFORE, and other stories.
* Volume 6: AN OLD-FASHIONED THANKSGIVING, and other stories.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bible (Literal Standard Version)/3 John
## Chapter 1

$^1$ The elder to Gaius the beloved, whom I love in truth! $^2$ Beloved, I desire you to prosper concerning all things, and to be in health, even as your soul prospers, $^3$ for I rejoiced exceedingly, brothers coming and testifying of the truth in you, even as you walk in truth; $^4$ I have no joy greater than these things, that I may hear of my children walking in truth. $^5$ Beloved, you act faithfully in whatever you may do toward the brothers and the one [among] strangers, $^6$ who testified of your love before an assembly, whom you will do well, having sent forward worthily of God, $^7$ because they went forth for [His] Name, receiving nothing from the nations; $^8$ we, then, ought to receive such, that we may become fellow-workers to the truth. $^9$ I wrote to the assembly, but he who is loving to be first among them—Diotrephes—does not receive us; $^{10}$ because of this, if I may come, I will cause him to remember his works that he does, talking nonsense against us with evil words; and not content with these, neither does he himself receive the brothers, and he forbids those intending [to receive them], and he casts [them] out of the assembly. $^{11}$ Beloved, do not be following that which is evil, but that which is good; he who is doing good, he is of God, [but] he who is doing evil has not seen God; $^{12}$ testimony has been given to Demetrius by all, and by the truth itself, and we also—we testify, and you have known that our testimony is true. $^{13}$ Many things I had to write, but I do not wish to write to you through ink and pen, $^{14}$ and I hope to see you soon, and we will speak mouth to mouth. Peace to you! The friends greet you. Be greeting the friends by name.
Old Testament
* Genesis
* Exodus
* Leviticus
* Numbers
* Deuteronomy
* Joshua
* Judges
* Ruth
* 1 Samuel
* 2 Samuel
* 1 Kings
* 2 Kings
* 1 Chronicles
* 2 Chronicles
* Ezra
* Nehemiah
* Esther
* Job
* Psalms
* Proverbs
* Ecclesiastes
* Song of Songs
* Isaiah
* Jeremiah
* Lamentations
* Ezekiel
* Daniel
* Hosea
* Joel
* Amos
* Obadiah
* Jonah
* Micah
* Nahum
* Habakkuk
* Zephaniah
* Haggai
* Zechariah
* Malachi
New Testament
* Matthew
* Mark
* Luke
* John
* Acts
* Romans
* 1 Corinthians
* 2 Corinthians
* Galatians
* Ephesians
* Philippians
* Colossians
* 1 Thessalonians
* 2 Thessalonians
* 1 Timothy
* 2 Timothy
* Titus
* Philemon
* Hebrews
* James
* 1 Peter
* 2 Peter
* 1 John
* 2 John
* 3 John
* Jude
* Revelation
# Bible (Literal Standard Version)/Covenant

COVENANT OF THE CCC
WE BELIEVE in One God, revealed to the world as YHWH of Israel, Uncreated, self-existent, eternal, all-powerful, and unchanging. He knows all things and there is nowhere where He is not. He is good, His word is inerrant, and His nature is love.
WE BELIEVE God subsists as the mutual indwelling of three persons: The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, in eternal communion. God the Son and God the Holy Spirit come from God the Father, And throughout eternity they have always existed with the Father.
WE BELIEVE God created time, space, matter, and all things, Accomplishing His initial act of creation in only six days. On the sixth day God created Man in His own image out of dust, Adam the first male and Eve the first female.
WE BELIEVE God said the man should be joined to his wife, And in so doing the two would become one flesh in marriage. In diversity He created the marital union sacred, monogamous, And dissoluble only by death or unfaithfulness.
WE BELIEVE God gave Man the choice of obedience or rebellion, And Adam and Eve willfully rebelled by eating the forbidden fruit, Which came from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. They suffered spiritual death and passed their sin nature on to us.
WE BELIEVE that God justly judged the world with a flood, Sparing Noah and his family through whom came the nations. And from Noah’s son Shem came Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, And from Jacob the twelve tribes of Israel and the prophets.
WE BELIEVE that in the fullness of time God gave us His Son, Born under the law to redeem those condemned by the law. He was born in the town of Bethlehem to a virgin named Mary, And in accordance with God’s command was named Jesus.
WE BELIEVE Jesus was chosen before the creation of the world, To live a sinless human life in perfect obedience to the Father, That He might die a substitutionary death in place of sinners, Giving forgiveness of sins and eternal life to all who trust in Him.
WE BELIEVE Jesus freely gave His life in obedience to the Father, And at the order of Pontius Pilate was flogged and crucified. At the ninth hour He declared His purpose in death was finished, And He died and was buried in the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea.
WE BELIEVE that death had no power over God’s perfect Son, And on the third day He conquered death by rising to life again. This was literal, physical, and attested to by over 500 witnesses, And is the event that gives power and validation to our faith.
WE BELIEVE men are only reconciled to God through Jesus Christ, And receive salvation by grace through faith apart from works. By the Spirit all believers are baptized into one body, the Church. Christians baptize, share communion, and love one another.
WE BELIEVE the Church is a universal priesthood of believers. Membership is not obtained by belonging to a denomination, But is received by trusting in Jesus for the forgiveness of sins. The Church awaits Jesus’ soon return when He will call us home.
# Berger v. New York

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
Berger v. New York, 388 U.S. 41 (1967) was a United States Supreme Court decision invalidating a New York law under the Fourth Amendment, because the statute authorized electronic eavesdropping without required procedural safeguards.

## Concurring Opinions

    Douglas
    Stewart

## Dissenting Opinions

    Black
    Harlan
    White
United States Supreme Court
388 U.S. 41
Berger v. New York
Argued: April 13, 1967. --- Decided: June 12, 1967
Showing of exigent circumstances is more important in obtaining eavesdropping permit than when conventional procedures of search and seizure are utilized. U.S.C.A.Const. Amends. 4, 14. Id.m
[Syllabus from pages 41-42 intentionally omitted]
Joseph E. Brill, New York City, for petitioner.
H. Richard Uviller, New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bergdoll v. Pollock

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
95 U.S. 337
Bergdoll v. Pollock
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
On the 22d of January, 1874, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, acting under the authority of sect. 2 of 'An Act for the reduction of officers and expenses of the internal revenue,' approved Dec. 24, 1872, 17 Stat. 402, Rev. Stat. 3182, assessed a tax of $1,350 on Bergdoll & Psotta, the plaintiffs, for 'one thousand three hundred and fifty barrels of beer sold and removed, & c., without proper stamps, to Oct. 1, 1873.' This assessment having been duly certified to the collector, the tax was paid upon compulsion and under protest. An appeal was then made to the commissioner, under the act of 1864, sect. 44, 13 Stat. 239, as amended in 1866, 14 Stat. 111, Rev. Stat., sect. 3226, to refund the amount paid, which being denied, this action was brought against Pollock, the collector, to recover back the money.
Upon the trial, the plaintiffs offered to prove by witnesses on the stand that, from the date at which the internal revenue act of 1866 went into effect, until the assessment complained of was made, 'no beer was sold or removed from their brewery for consumption or sale except in barrels or parts of barrels, which were all duly stamped with an internal revenue stamp, . . . as required by the act of Congress;' that they 'had made their monthly returns to the collector regularly until and including the month of December, 1873; that there was no understatement or undervaluation in either of said returns of the quantity of beer brewed, or of beer sold or removed from their brewery for consumption or sale, and that neither of the returns was false or fraudulent.' This testimony was excluded by the court, and exceptions taken. Judgment having been rendered against the plaintiffs, they sued out this writ of error.
The errors relied upon are: 1. That the assessment is insufficient in law, because too indefinite and uncertain; and, 2. That the testimony offered was improperly rejected.
Mr. William S. Price for the plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Assistant Attorney-General Smith, contra.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Berger v. California

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 314
Berger v. California
Argued: Jan. 13, 1969. ---
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Marvin A. Bauer, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bergemann v. Backer

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
157 U.S. 655
Bergemann v. Backer
Wm. D. Daly, for appellant.
Joshua S. Salmon, for appellee.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bailey v. Alabama (211 U.S. 452)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
211 U.S. 452
Bailey v. Alabama
Argued: November 12, 1908. --- Decided: December 21, 1908
Messrs. Edward S. Watts, Fred S. Ball, and Troy, Watts, & Letcher for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Alexander M. Garber and Thomas W. Martin for defendant in error,
Attorney General Bonaparte and Robert A. Howard (by special leave) as amici curioe.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bailey v. Alabama (219 U.S. 219)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Bailey v. Alabama, 219 U.S. 219 (1911), was a United States Supreme Court case which overturned the peonage laws of Alabama.
United States Supreme Court
219 U.S. 219
Bailey v. Alabama
Error to the Supreme Court of Alabama
No. 300 Argued: October 20, 21, 1910 --- Decided: January 3, 1911
Messrs. Edward S. Watts, Fred S. Ball, and Daniel W. Troy for plaintiff in error.
Assistant Attorney General Harr, with Attorney General Wickersham, as amici curiae.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 220-224 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Alexander M. Garber and Thomas W. Martin for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 224-227 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bailey v. Anderson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
326 U.S. 203
Bailey v. Anderson
Argued: Oct. 15, 1945. --- Decided: Nov 5, 1945
As Amended on Denial of Rehearing Dec. 3, 1945.
See 66 S.Ct. 228.
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of virginia.
Mr. Bernard B. Bailey, pro se.
Mr. Abram P. Staples, of Richmond, Va., for appellee.
Mr. Chief Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
319 U.S. 350
Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway
Argued: April 13, 1943. --- Decided: May 24, 1943
Mr. Joseph A. McNamara, of Burlington, Vt., for petitioner.
Mr. Horace H. Powers, of St. Albans, Vt., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Australia Felix/Part II

* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
* Chapter VII
* Chapter VIII
# Biographical Sketches of Dekkan Poets/Lakshmana kavi

LAKSHMANA KAVI.
This poet was a Smarta Bramin of the Varanasi tribe, and a native of Bandar Sircar, he was the son of Venkatesa Kavi and lived in the fifteenth ceutury of Salivahana. In early life he ​studied the Telugu and Sanscrit language, and spent fifteen years in the perusal of ancient books, written on various subjects, especially beautiful poetic compositions. Lakshmana kept company with the public dancers, and accurately observed their various postures and motions, as described in the work called Bharata, but finding himself despised by respectable people, on account of his associating with common singers and dancers, he determined to relinquish their society, as such was derogatory to his character, and avail himself of his knowledge in poetry to compose some work deserving the regard of the learned. By the advice of several pundits he resolved to complete the Bhoja Champu, commonly called Champu Ramayana, only five books of which had been written during the life time of Bhoja Raja, in consequence of the death of Kalidas; and no one since had been able to finish the Poem. Lakshmana undertook to complete the task, and produced the sixth book of that celebrated work, called Yuda Kanda, consisting of about two thousand verses. This effort procured for our poet great renown, and obtained ​for him the title of Bhoja Champu Lakshmana—Sarud Raja conferred on him marks, of distinction and presents, and his book was studied in different Colleges. Lakshmana died at Masulipatam, when fifty five years of age.
# Biographical Sketches of Dekkan Poets/Mallana

MALLANA.
Was the Son of Bommana Pataraju. He was in his Infancy educated by his father, who taught him grammar and other branches of learning. While yet a youth, he composed the Rukmangada Charitra an epic poem in four books, ​to commemorate the marriage of king Rukmangada with the princess Sandhyavali.—According to tradition, this poet composed several other works, but none of them are now in existence.
# Biographical Sketches of Dekkan Poets/Mallaya

MALLAYA.
Was an inhabitant of Kondavede, and the son of Madayor, he was a bramin of the Lingadhare sect, most of the bramins were converted to the Lingavant sect, by Bissala Roya, king of Kalayani: these bramins wear a stone lingum round their necks, and make oblations to it, and worship it after performing ablutions. Malaya received a good education in his infancy, and while yet in his youth, wrote the Raja Sekhara Charitra, or a poetical history of Raja Sekhara, a king of former ages. When this work was finished, the poet dedicated it to Nandala Appaya, son in law to Saluva Timma, a king who lived in the fifteenth century of Salivahana, after the reign of Kristna Deva Maharoyaloo, king of Anagondi. Malaya received rich rewards from this patron in lands and other presents.
# Biographical Sketches of Dekkan Poets/Lakshmana Kavi the second

LAKSHMANA KAVI THE SECOND.
A Telugu grammarian and poet, and resident of Kondavede; during his infancy he obtained an excellent education, and composed a Telugu grammar, called Prabandha Rajeyam— this was the chief work composed by this poet, and was reckoned a very useful treatise, and it obtained for the author the appellation of Lakshamana Kavi, or the grammatical poet, which cognomen after ages have adopted. This poet earned his subsistence merely by the labours of his pen and died much respected.
# Biographical Sketches of Dekkan Poets/Linga Raja

LINGA RAJA.
A grammarian and poet of the Telugu country, he was educated in his infancy in the Telugu languages, and soon became a proficient; he held some post in the royal house-hold at Andhra, and obtained the surname of Raja, on account of the respect paid to him by princes. He was a constant worshipper of the God Nrisimha of Malyadri, and during his leisure hours composed a Telugu grammar, and dedicated it to the above named deity; this work in after ages has been denominated Malyadri-Nrisimha-Chandasu: Linga Rajah, according to authentic accounts died in the prime of life.
# Biographical Sketches of Dekkan Poets/Madhava Roya

MADHAVAROYA.
This poet was by cast a Velamawar, he was a native of Adoni, and minister to the Prince of that capital, he was a very learned man, and such hours as he could spare from his public avocations, he devoted to reading and the composition of Telugu verse, he wrote a work called Chandrika Parinaya.
# Biographical Sketches of Dekkan Poets/Linga Kavi

LINGA KAVI.
A Telugu poet and historian. While studying at school, he read over many histories of ancient kings, particularly the sixteen monarchs of the solar race, he made a Telugu version of the history of Sananda, from the Purans, in which was included that sovereigns birth, marriage, the ​deeds of forresters, the conduct of Kings, the increase of wild beasts, the sports of the field, pleasures of pastime in elegant gardens, the king's return to his capital, his administration, and various other subjects: the whole is written in three chapters. This poet was much respected by men of note in his native country, and obtained rich rewards from them, he died at his own residence.
# Biographical Sketches of Dekkan Poets/Lingaya

LINGAYA.
This poet was an inhabitant of the Telugu country. He was during his infancy well educated in the Sanscrit and Telugu languages. He translated from Sanscrit into Telugu a treatise on the science of palmistry, a work, which became very popular with the learned, and with various princes.
# Biographical Sketches of Dekkan Poets/Loka Bhandhava

LOKABANDHAVA.
A native of the Telugu country, his name which means a friend of the world, he obtained, because he had simplified the history of Harischundra, so has to make it intelligible to common capacities: he lived to a good old age, but did not compose any other work.
# Bank of the United States v. Green/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
31 U.S. 26
Bank of the United States v. Green
The division of opinion was not upon any matter arising at the trial of the cause, but was upon a mere matter arising upon the service of the execution by the marshal; and was a mere question for the circuit court upon a collateral contest between the marshal and the bank, as to his right to fees. It was not therefore a case within the purview of the judicial act of 1802.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bank of the United States v. Martin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
30 U.S. 479
Bank of the United States v. Martin
ERROR to the district court of the United States for the district of Alabama.
Mr Webster stated, that on inspecting the record of the proceedings in the court below, he was satisfied the district court of Alabama had not jurisdiction of suits instituted by the bank of the United States. It has already been decided that the courts of the United States have jurisdiction in suits brought by the bank, only by virtue of the special provision in the charter; and the right of the bank to sue in the district court of Alabama is not given by the act incorporating the bank. He refered to the tenth section of the act of congress of September 1789: and to the act of the 21st of April 1820, constituting the courts of Louisiana. The Bank of the United States vs. Deveaux, 5 Cranch, 61. 2 Peters's Cond. Rep. 189.
Mr Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse