OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Book of Mormon (Plain English Version)/2 Nephi/Chapter 17

​Isaiah's tells Ahaz not to fear... (compare 2 Nephi, chapter 17) ​When Ahaz (grandson of Uzziah) was king of Judah, King Rezin of Syria, and Pekah, son of King Remaliah of Israel, both went to war against Jerusalem, but they could not prevail against it.
It was known among the house of David (tribe of Judah) that King Rezin had conspired with Pekah (tribe of Ephraim). This is why Ahaz and his people were afraid of being attacked.
Then the Lord said to me, Isaiah,
       "Take your son, Shearjashub, and go meet Ahaz on the highway at the point where it meets the irrigation canal that comes from the wool cleaners spring.
       Tell Ahaz not to fear the fierce anger of Rezin and Pekah.
       He should not be concerned that Syria (Rezin) and Ephraim (Pekah) have conspired against him by saying, ‘Let us go up against Judah to conquer it, and to put in Tabeal’s son as king,’ for I, the Lord God, tell you that their plan will not come to pass.
       Also tell Ahaz that for now...
             ...the head of Syria is Damascus.
             ...the head of Damascus is Rezin.
             ... Samaria is likewise the head of Ephraim.
             ...Remaliah’s son, Pekah, is the head of Samaria.
       But within sixty-five years, Ephraim will not be a united nation.
       If Ahaz will not believe this prophecy, he will not be established.”
After giving this message to Ahaz, I, Isaiah, said to him,
“Ask for a sign from the Lord -- a sign in the heavens or in the earth."
But Ahaz replied, "I won't ask for a sign and tempt the Lord.”
but will you also weary my God? The Lord Himself will give you this sign...
A virgin will conceive and bear a son, and name Him Immanuel (God with us). By the time He is old enough to eat butter and honey, He will already know how to refuse evil and choose good.
But before this, Samaria and Damascus will both have their kings removed.
The house of Israel will see days of despair unknown since the time that Ephraim left Judah, for the Lord will bring the king of Assyria upon you, upon your people and your father's house.
In that day (a type for the last days), the Lord will call in armies from the outer parts of Egypt and Assyria who will come quickly like flies and bees. They will settle in the desolate valleys and caves near the water holes where thorns and bushes grow.
In one day, the Lord will hire the king of Assyria as a razor, who will come from beyond the river to humble the house of Israel.
After this destruction, the righteous will still be able to feed their animals. In Zion, there will be an abundance of milk, and all who are left in the land will eat butter and honey.
In that day, all the places of Babylon that used to flourish with crops and vegetation will be dried up and become a place for briars and thorns. In those places, men will hunt with bows and arrows, searching for food.
All the hills that were once plowed and cultivated will not produce food because of the drought. The land will only be good for hungry oxen and cattle to wander over in search for food."
# Beyond the City

Beyond the City
A Novel
By A. Conan Doyle, author of "The White Company," "The Sign of the Four," "Micah Clarke", "A Study in Scarlet," Etc. . . . . . . . . .
New York and London Street & Smith, Publishers
* Chapter 1: The New-comers
* Chapter 2: Breaking the Ice
* Chapter 3: Dwellers in the Wilderness
* Chapter 4: A Sister's Secret
* Chapter 5: A Naval Conquest
* Chapter 6: An Old Story
* Chapter 7: Venit Tandem Felicitas
* Chapter 8: Shadows Before
* Chapter 9: A Family Plot
* Chapter 10: Women of the Future
* Chapter 11: A Blot from the Blue
* Chapter 12: Friends in Need
* Chapter 13: In Strange Waters
* Chapter 14: Eastward Ho!
* Chapter 15: Still among Shoals
* Chapter 16: A Midnight Visitor
* Chapter 17: In Port at Last
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1930, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 93 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# CAFTA good for U.S.

From www.dod.gov
Not too long ago, Central America was torn by civil strife and ruled by authoritarian regimes. For decades the United States was concerned about a growing trend toward Marxist radicalism in the region and the implications for American and hemispheric security.
Yet in the past two decades the Central American nations have transformed themselves in impressive ways -- which is a credit above all to their industrious and determined people. Dictatorships have given way to democracies, and rivalries that once threatened stability are now relics of the past. Central American leaders look for opportunities to cooperate with each other and the United States in many fields: economic, scientific and military. Indeed, many sent troops to Iraq and have supported other coalition efforts in the global struggle against violent extremism.
This period has been called a magic moment for Central America. The rise of a free and peaceful Central America has allowed the United States to form alliances to combat drug traffickers, hostage takers, gangs and terrorists -- anti-social combinations that threaten our country as well. Growing links between the United States and Central America would further undermine the efforts of those seeking to return Central American governments to the days of corruption, lawlessness and hostility toward the United States.
Central Americans were among the first to stand with us after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 -- offering support and friendship. Central American countries helped restore order and peace in Haiti and are working with the United States in military partnerships both within and outside the region. As our country continues to take the offense against the violent extremism that is threatening civilized societies, we have been able to do so confident that our own hemisphere is a zone of peace and freedom.
In my view, a rejection of the Central American Free Trade Agreement would do more than simply bring this cooperation and much of the region's progress to a halt. Our neighbors do not live in a vacuum and they are facing many pressures to turn away from a pro-American stance. Cuba and Venezuela -- no friends to the United States -- are promoting radicalism and attempting to subvert the democratic governments in the region. Indeed, Venezuela is actively lobbying local legislators in Central America to vote against CAFTA.
This can and must be a time of tremendous promise for Central America if we seize the opportunities that CAFTA represents. No one can know the future with certainty. But if the United States and its neighbors continue to strengthen ties, this magic moment for Central America could become an historic turning point: an era when a fast-evolving region of 47 million people achieved greater prosperity and found firm footing as a true partner and friend of the United States.
The coming vote on CAFTA is a national-security vote. Let there be no doubt.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# CACCF FAQ 2005-11-04

* related portals: National Archives and Records Administration.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
National Archives and Records Administration
8601 Adelphi Road College Park, Maryland 20740-6001
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Record Group 330 Series: Records on Military Personnel Who Died, Were Missing in Action or Prisoners of War as a Result of the Vietnam Conflict (CACCF)
What information is in these records? This series, otherwise known as the Combat Area Casualties Data or CACDB, contains records of U.S. military officers and soldiers who died as a result of either a hostile or nonhostile occurrence or who were missing in action or prisoners or war in the Southeast Asian combat area during the Vietnamese Conflict.
Why were these records created? The agency created this series as the official repository for records on U.S. military casualties in the Southeast Asian combat areas during the Vietnam Conflict and used the database as the source for official information about U.S. military personnel casualties related to the Vietnam Conflict and for disseminating statistical data concerning them.
Why are there two files in this series on AAD? This series has two files" (1) the Combat Area Casualties Current File, or CACCF; and (2) the Combat Area Casualties Returned Alive File, or CACRAF. The CACCF contains final records of fatal casualties and records of persons who were captured or missing in action and who were subsequently declared dead. The CACRAF contains final records of persons who were prisoners of war or missing in action and who were subsequently repatriated.
If the Vietnam Conflict ended in 1974, why do these records end in 1998? The records of the CACDB are current as of December 19, 1998, the last time the Department of Defense (DoD) transferred a copy of the CACDB into the custody of NARA. They include records of personnel who died or were declared dead post-1974. The DoD continues to maintain and revise the records of the CACDB and plans to transfer an updated CACDB to NARA which we will then make available to researchers.
Why are there pound signs in the Returned Alive file? Following FOIA exemption (b)(6) for personal information, NARA staff masked values in the "Social Security Or Service Number" and the "Religion" fields with ######### and ##.
November 4, 2005
NARA'S web site is http://www.archives.gov
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# C. L. M.

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
In the dark womb where I began
My mother's life made me a man.
Through all the months of human birth
Her beauty fed my common earth.
I cannot see, nor breathe, nor stir,
But through the death of some of her.
Down in the darkness of the grave
She cannot see the life she gave.
For all her love, she cannot tell
Whether I use it ill or well,
Nor knock at dusty doors to find
Her beauty dusty in the mind.
If the grave's gates could be undone,
She would not know her little son,
I am so grown. If we should meet
She would pass by me in the street,
Unless my soul's face let her see
My sense of what she did for me.
What have I done to keep in mind
My debt to her and womankind?
What woman's happier life repays
Her for those months of wretched days?
For all my mouthless body leeched
Ere Birth's releasing hell was reached?
What have I done, or tried, or said
In thanks to that dear woman dead?
Men triumph over women still,
Men trample women's rights at will,
And man's lust roves the world untamed.
O grave, keep shut lest I be shamed.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1967, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 56 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# C. Overview of Inurement/Private Benefit Issues in IRC 501(c)(3)/est of Hawaii

1990 EO CPE Text. C. Overview of Inurement/Private Benefit Issues in IRC 501(c)(3), Section 6.C.2. "est of Hawaii", pp. 33-34.

## 6. Problems Involving Multiple Entities

    C. More Complex Cases
       2. est of Hawaii
est of Hawaii v. Commissioner, 71 T.C. 1067 (1979), aff'd, 647 F.2d 170 (9th Cir. 1981), involved the marketing of a self realization program developed by Werner Erhard and known as "Erhard Seminar Training." Rights to commercially exploit the program were held by EST, Inc., a for profit corporation. In 1973 a franchise system was created whereby EST, Inc., would relinquish its operations in a particular geographic area to a local tax-exempt corporation. EST, Inc., through one or more intervening corporations, would supply qualified personnel to staff the organization, furnish materials needed to conduct the organization's activities, and assure that the organization conducted its activities in conformity with the standards of EST, Inc.
est of Hawaii was a corporation formed in Hawaii to act as a local provider of est services. It conducted training programs for fees and out of the fees it paid its operating expenses and a franchise fee which entitled it to use the EST methods, name, and materials.
est of Hawaii applied for recognition of exemption under IRC 501(c)(3). The Service ruled that the organization was not operated exclusively for exempt purposes because it served private commercial interests. The organization sought a declaratory judgment in the Tax Court.
est argued that it had no commercial purpose itself. Payments for its franchise were ordinary and necessary expenses. It was entirely independent from its franchiser.
The Tax Court disagreed. Since the franchise arrangements controlled the tuition fees the Hawaii organization could charge, set the minimum number of students it must serve, supplied the programs it would use, and provided the personnel to manage the organization, est of Hawaii was left with no function
   except to present to the public for a fee ideas that are owned by International [one of the intervening corporations] with materials and trainers that are supplied and controlled by EST, Inc. Under these circumstances it cannot be said that petitioner has made payments to a corporation with which it had no connection whatsoever. Supra, at 1080.
Since the existence and operation of the direct customer service corporations was an essential element in the generation of income for the for-profit corporations, the Court concluded that est of Hawaii was itself engaged in commercial activity for the benefit of the for-profit corporations.

## See also

* Est of Hawaii v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Docket No. 9866-77X (1979)

## External links

* 2. est of Hawaii, Hosted at Internal Revenue Service.
* Erhard Seminars Training on Wikipedia
* Werner Erhard on Wikipedia
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# C. Overview of Inurement/Private Benefit Issues in IRC 501(c)(3)

1990 EO CPE Text. C. Overview of Inurement/Private Benefit Issues in IRC 501(c)(3)
C. Overview of Inurement/Private Benefit Issues in IRC 501(c)(3)
    6. Problems Involving Multiple Entities
       C. More Complex Cases
          2. est of Hawaii

## External links

* C. Overview of Inurement/Private Benefit Issues in IRC 501(c)(3), PDF document hosted at Internal Revenue Service.
* , the same PDF document as above hosted at Wikimedia Commons.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# CSRT Summary of Evidence memo for Rahmatullah Sangaryar

Wikified from page 60 of http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_mar05.pdf, on April 19, 2007.
890 UNCLASSIFIED COMBATANT STATUS REVIEW BOARD
| To: | Personal Representative |
| From: | OIC, CSRT (19 October 2004) |
| Subject: | Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal [ (b)(6) ] |
| 1. | Under the provisions of the Secretary of the Navy Memorandum, dated 29 July 2004, Implementation of Combatant Status Review Tribunal Procedures for Enemy Combatants Detained at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base Cuba, a Tribunal has been appointed to review the detainee's designation as an enemy combatant. |
| 2. | An enemy combatant has been defined as "an individual who was part of or supporting the Taliban or al Qaida forces, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. This included any person who committed a belligerent act or has directly supported hostilities in aid of enemy armed forces." |
| 3. | The United States Government has previously determined that the detainee is an enemy combatant. This determination is based on information possessed by the United States that indicates that he is a member of the Taliban. |
| | a. The detainee is a member of the Taliban: 1. The detainee was a Taliban military commander. 2. The detainee knew of many former Taliban Commanders. 3. The detainee was the ########## ############ ########### ######## ####### ########## in Kandahar Afghanistan. 4. Hizb-I Islami Gulbuddin (HIG) is a terrorist group. 5. The detainee paid others to warn him when Americans forces were in his area. b. The detainee engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners: 1. The detainee admitted fighting against the United States or its coalition partners. 2. The detainee reportedly was ########################## in the Tagab and Nejrab district. 3. The detainee was a member of a 40-man unit primarily operating against U.S. personnel, intending to bomb or strike soft targets. |
| 4. | The detainee has the opportunity to contest his designation as an enemy combatant. The Tribunal will endeavor to arrange for the presence of any reasonably available witnesses or evidence that the detainee desires to call or introduce to prove that he is not an enemy combatant. The Tribunal President will determine the reasonable availability of availability of evidence or witnesses. |
258 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-1
# CSRT Summary of Evidence memo for Mana Shaman Allabardi Al Tabi

* related portals: Guantanamo.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Wikified from page 6 of http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/000500-000599.pdf#6 on October 2th, 2007
UNCLASSIFIED COMBATANT STATUS REVIEW BOARD
| To: | Personal Representative |
| From: | OIC, CSRT (07 October 2004) |
| Subject: | Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal AL TABI, Mana Shaman Allabardi. |
| 1. | Under the provisions of the Secretary of the Navy Memorandum, dated 29 July 2004, Implementation of Combatant Status Review Tribunal Procedures for Enemy Combatants Detained at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base Cuba, a Tribunal has been appointed to review the detainee's designation as an enemy combatant. |
| 2. | An enemy combatant has been defined as "an individual who was part of or supporting the Taliban or al Qaida forces, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. This included any person who committed a belligerent act or has directly supported hostilities in aid of enemy armed forces." |
| 3. | The United States Government has previously determined that the detainee is an enemy combatant. This determination is based on information possessed by the United States that indicates that the detainee is a member of al Qaida. |
| | a.The detainee is associated with al Qaida: 1.The detainee is a member of Jamaat al-Tabligh (JAT). 2.JAT, a Pakistan-based Islamic missionary organization is being used as a cover to mask travel and other activities of terrorists, including members of al Qaida. 3.The detainee was arrested with a stolen passport. 4.The detainee was arrested wearing women's clothing in order to get around Pakistani checkpoints. 5.The detainee's family and friends reportedly stated he was traveling to Afghanistan. 6.The detainee was drafted by the Saudi Arabian military and went Absent Without Leave. 7.The detainee with suspicious individuals prior to traveling to Bahrain on 25 August 2001. 8.The detainee was identified at the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan when the identifier was fleeing Afghanistan following the fall of Kabul. |
| 4. | The detainee has the opportunity to contest his designation as an enemy combatant. The Tribunal will endeavor to arrange for the presence of any reasonably available witnesses or evidence that the detainee desires to call or introduce to prove that he is not an enemy combatant. The Tribunal President will determine the reasonable availability of availability of evidence or witnesses. |
505 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-1
# CSRT Summary of Evidence memo for Mehrabanb Fazrollah

* related portals: Guantanamo.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Wikified from page 69 of http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_mar05.pdf, on April 20, 2007.
77 UNCLASSIFIED COMBATANT STATUS REVIEW BOARD
| To: | Personal Representative |
| From: | OIC, CSRT (30 September 2004) |
| Subject: | Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal [ (b)(6) ] |
| 1. | Under the provisions of the Secretary of the Navy Memorandum, dated 29 July 2004, Implementation of Combatant Status Review Tribunal Procedures for Enemy Combatants Detained at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base Cuba, a Tribunal has been appointed to review the detainee's designation as an enemy combatant. |
| 2. | An enemy combatant has been defined as "an individual who was part of or supporting the Taliban or al Qaida forces, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. This included any person who committed a belligerent act or has directly supported hostilities in aid of enemy armed forces." |
| 3. | The United States Government has previously determined that the detainee is an enemy combatant. This determination is based on information possessed by the United States that indicates that he is a member of the Taliban. |
| | a. The detaine is a member of the Taliban. 1. The detainee voluntarily traveled from Tajikistan to Afghanistan in March or April of 2001. b. The detainee participated in operations against the United States and/or its coalition partners. 1. The detainee admitted to fighting with the Taliban. 2. The detainee was captured carrying a Kalishnikov rifle and ammunition. |
| 4. | The detainee has the opportunity to contest his designation as an enemy combatant. The Tribunal will endeavor to arrange for the presence of any reasonably available witnesses or evidence that the detainee desires to call or introduce to prove that he is not an enemy combatant. The Tribunal President will determine the reasonable availability of availability of evidence or witnesses. |
269 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-1