OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Reports/Volume 574

* 574 U.S. ___ (2014) Lopez v. Smith
* 574 U.S. ___ (2014) Johnson v. City of Shelby
* 574 U.S. ___ (2014) Carroll v. Carman
* 574 U.S. ___ (2014) Glebe v. Frost
* 574 U.S. ___ (2014) Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk
* 574 U.S. ___ (2014) Warger v. Shauers
* 574 U.S. ___ (2014) Heien v. North Carolina
* 574 U.S. ___ (2014) Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. Owens
* 574 U.S. ___ (2014) United States v. California
* 574 U.S. ___ (2015) Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
* 574 U.S. ___ (2015) Whitfield v. United States
* 574 U.S. ___ (2015) Jennings v. Stephens
* 574 U.S. ___ (2015) T-Mobile South, LLC v. City of Roswell
* 574 U.S. ___ (2015) Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.
* 574 U.S. ___ (2015) Holt v. Hobbs
* 574 U.S. ___ (2015) Christeson v. Roper
* 574 U.S. ___ (2015) Department of Homeland Security v. MacLean
* 574 U.S. ___ (2015) Gelboim v. Bank of America Corp.
* 574 U.S. ___ (2015) Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank
* 574 U.S. ___ (2015) M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. Tackett
* 574 U.S. ___ (2015) Kansas v. Nebraska
* 574 U.S. ___ (2015) North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC
* 574 U.S. ___ (2015) Yates v. United States
# United States Reports/Volume 579

* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) Williams v. Pennsylvania
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) Dietz v. Bouldin
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) Puerto Rico v. Franklin California Tax-Free Trust
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) United States v. Bryant
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) Utah v. Strieff
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) Taylor v. United States
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) Fisher v. University of Tex. at Austin
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) Birchfield v. North Dakota
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) Mathis v. United States
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) Dollar General Corp. v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) United States v. Texas
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) McDonnell v. United States
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt
* 579 U.S. ___ (2016) Voisine v. United States
# United States Reports/Volume 88

21 Wall.[ace], ( 22 L.Ed. )
* 88 U.S. 1 The Lady Pike
* 88 U.S. 17 (1874) Jerome v. McCarter
* 88 U.S. 33 Doane v. Glenn
* 88 U.S. 36 Gardner v. Brown
* 88 U.S. 41 Vannevar v. Bryant
* 88 U.S. 44 Schulenberg v. Harriman
* 88 U.S. 65 Clinkenbeard v. United States
* 88 U.S. 71 Maxwell v. Stewart
* 88 U.S. 73 Hamilton v. Dillin
* 88 U.S. 98 Douglass v. Douglass' Administrator
* 88 U.S. 98 McClelland v. United States
* 88 U.S. 105 Cooper & Company v. Coates & Company
* 88 U.S. 112 Smith v. Nichols
* 88 U.S. 119 City of Sacramento v. Fowle
* 88 U.S. 123 Watson v. Bondurant
* 88 U.S. 130 Dupasseur v. Rochereau
* 88 U.S. 138 Vermilye & Company v. Adams Express Company
* 88 U.S. 147 French v. Edwards
* 88 U.S. 152 American Life Insurance Company v. Mahone
* 88 U.S. 158 (1874) Springfield Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Sea
* 88 U.S. 162 Minor v. Happersett
* 88 U.S. 178 Marsh v. Whitmore
* 88 U.S. 185 Adams v. Adams
* 88 U.S. 196 Garrison v. City of New York
* 88 U.S. 205 Littlefield v. Perry
* 88 U.S. 230 The Mohler
* 88 U.S. 235 Ex parte Sawyer
* 88 U.S. 241 Tilden v. Blair
* 88 U.S. 249 Ochiltree v. Railroad Company
* 88 U.S. 255 Railroad Company v. Smith
* 88 U.S. 264 Express Company v. Caldwell
* 88 U.S. 272 Butler v. United States
* 88 U.S. 276 Yonley v. Lavender
* 88 U.S. 284 Bailey Collector v. Clark
* 88 U.S. 289 Terrell v. Allison
* 88 U.S. 294 Decatur Bank v. St. Louis Bank
* 88 U.S. 302 Jennisons v. Leonard
* 88 U.S. 310 Railroad Land Company v. Courtright
* 88 U.S. 317 Chambers County v. Clews
* 88 U.S. 325 Clarion Bank v. Jones Assignee
* 88 U.S. 342 Bailey v. Glover
* 88 U.S. 350 Mitchell v. United States
* 88 U.S. 354 Hotchkiss v. National Banks
* 88 U.S. 360 Clark v. Iselin
* 88 U.S. 378 Watson v. Taylor
* 88 U.S. 387 Brown v. Brackett
* 88 U.S. 389 Atlee v. Packet Company
* 88 U.S. 398 Michaels v. Post Assignee
* 88 U.S. 430 Dillon v. Barnard
* 88 U.S. 441 Trist v. Child
* 88 U.S. 453 Hill v. Mendenhall
* 88 U.S. 456 Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Maryland
* 88 U.S. 475 Fox v. Gardner
* 88 U.S. 481 Grosholz v. Newman
* 88 U.S. 488 Texas v. Chiles
* 88 U.S. 492 Erie Railway Company v. Pennsylvania
* 88 U.S. 500 Little Assignee v. Alexander
* 88 U.S. 503 Case of Broderick's Will
* 88 U.S. 521 Langdeau v. Hanes
* 88 U.S. 532 Edwards v. Elliott
* 88 U.S. 558 The Lottawanna
* 88 U.S. 609 National Bank v. Colby
* 88 U.S. 616 Jackson v. Ludeling
* 88 U.S. 636 Moore v. Mississippi
* 88 U.S. 640 Wood v. Bailey Assignee
* 88 U.S. 642 Doe v. Childress
* 88 U.S. 648 Vigo's Case
* 88 U.S. 652 United States v. Boecker
* 88 U.S. 660 Morton v. Nebraska
# United States Reports/Volume 85

18 Wall.[ace], ( 21 L.Ed. )
* 85 U.S. 1 Allen v. Ferguson
* 85 U.S. 5 Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Peniston
* 85 U.S. 51 The Sapphire
* 85 U.S. 57 Weber v. Board of Harbor Commissioners
* 85 U.S. 71 Supervisors v. United States
* 85 U.S. 84 Stuart v. United States
* 85 U.S. 91 Willett v. Fister
* 85 U.S. 99 Masterson v. Howard
* 85 U.S. 106 Washington University v. Finch
* 85 U.S. 112 (1839) Best v. Polk
* 85 U.S. 120 Coffin v. Ogden
* 85 U.S. 125 United States v. Buzzo
* 85 U.S. 129 Bartemeyer v. Iowa
* 85 U.S. 141 Sykes v. Chadwick
* 85 U.S. 151 Batesville Institute v. Kauffman
* 85 U.S. 156 (1862) Day v. Micou
* 85 U.S. 163 Ex parte Lange
* 85 U.S. 206 Delaware Railroad Tax Minot v. Philadelphia Wilington and Baltimre Railroad Company
* 85 U.S. 233 Chicago City Railway Company v. Allerton
* 85 U.S. 237 Mercantile Mutual Insurance Company v. Folsom
* 85 U.S. 255 Henshaw v. Bissell
* 85 U.S. 272 Atkins v. Disintegrating Company
* 85 U.S. 307 Lamb v. Davenport
* 85 U.S. 317 Snow v. United States
* 85 U.S. 322 Westray v. United States
* 85 U.S. 332 Cook v. Tullis
* 85 U.S. 342 Mulhall v. Keenan
* 85 U.S. 350 Galpin v. Page
* 85 U.S. 375 Tiffany v. Boatman's Institution
* 85 U.S. 391 Trask v. Maguire
* 85 U.S. 409 Tiffany v. National Bank of Missouri
* 85 U.S. 414 Eunson v. Dodge
* 85 U.S. 417 Ex parte State Insurance Company
* 85 U.S. 421 Miltenberger v. Cooke
* 85 U.S. 430 Brent v. Maryland
* 85 U.S. 436 Lucas v. Brooks
* 85 U.S. 457 Thompson v. Whitman
* 85 U.S. 471 Tennessee and Alabama Central Railroad Company v. Orr
* 85 U.S. 476 Glenn v. Johnson
* 85 U.S. 478 (1864) New Jersey Steamboat Company v. The Collector
* 85 U.S. 493 Clarke v. Boorman's Executors
* 85 U.S. 510 Bean v. Beckwith
* 85 U.S. 516 Chaffee v. United States
* 85 U.S. 546 Boyce v. Tabb
* 85 U.S. 549 Tacey v. Irwin
* 85 U.S. 552 Town of Ohio v. Marcy
* 85 U.S. 553 (1866) Case of the Sewing Machine Companies
* 85 U.S. 588 (1873) Moore v. Robbins
* 85 U.S. 589 Bullard v. Bank
* 85 U.S. 598 The Favorita
* 85 U.S. 604 (1870) Espy v. Bank of Cincinnati
* 85 U.S. 623 Grant v. Strong
* 85 U.S. 626 Davenport v. Dows
* 85 U.S. 628 St. Clair County v. Lovingston
* 85 U.S. 629 Gray v. Rollo
* 85 U.S. 635 Bartholow v. Bean
* 85 U.S. 642 Dandelet v. Smith
* 85 U.S. 648 Hornbuckle v. Toombs
* 85 U.S. 657 Hershfield v. Griffith
* 85 U.S. 659 Davis v. Bilsland
* 85 U.S. 662 Jones v. United States
* 85 U.S. 664 Shrewsbury v. United States
* 85 U.S. 670 Hicks v. Kelsey
# United States Reports/Volume 86

19 Wall.[ace], ( 22 L.Ed. )
* 86 U.S. 1 Barings v. Dabney
* 86 U.S. 12 Hodges v. Vaughan
* 86 U.S. 13 Stowe v. United States
* 86 U.S. 17 Salomon v. United States
* 86 U.S. 20 McCarthy v. Mann
* 86 U.S. 32 Zantzingers v. Gunton
* 86 U.S. 37 Bulkley v. United States
* 86 U.S. 41 The Wenona
* 86 U.S. 58 Knowles v. Gaslight and Coke Company
* 86 U.S. 62 Railroad Company v. Church
* 86 U.S. 65 Cooper Executor v. Omohundro
* 86 U.S. 70 Crews v. Brewer
* 86 U.S. 73 The Lucille
* 86 U.S. 75 The Falcon
* 86 U.S. 81 Morgan's Executor v. Gay
* 86 U.S. 83 Town of Queensbury v. Culver
* 86 U.S. 94 (1872) Robertson v. Carson
* 86 U.S. 107 Rees v. City of Watertown
* 86 U.S. 125 (1864) The Pennsylvania
* 86 U.S. 138 Carpenter v. Rannels
* 86 U.S. 146 Sawyer v. Prickett
* 86 U.S. 167 Cropley v. Cooper
* 86 U.S. 178 The Rio Grande
* 86 U.S. 189 Eldred v. Sexton
* 86 U.S. 198 (1844) United States v. Gaussen
* 86 U.S. 214 (1867) Home Life Insurance Company v. Dunn
* 86 U.S. 227 Dollar Savings Bank v. United States
* 86 U.S. 241 Nugent v. The Supervisors
* 86 U.S. 254 Kitchen v. Rayburn
* 86 U.S. 264 Caldwell's Case
* 86 U.S. 271 Hall v. Jordan
* 86 U.S. 274 Coit v. Robinson
* 86 U.S. 287 (1864) Mitchell v. Tilghman
* 86 U.S. 419 Union Telegraph Company v. Eyser
* 86 U.S. 433 Klein v. Russell
* 86 U.S. 468 The Mayor v. Ray
* 86 U.S. 485 The Mayor v. Lindsey
* 86 U.S. 486 United States v. Arwo
* 86 U.S. 490 Tappan Collector v. Merchants' National Bank
* 86 U.S. 505 Ex parte Robinson
* 86 U.S. 513 Same Case on Appeal
* 86 U.S. 514 Ryan v. United States
* 86 U.S. 519 Burke v. Miltenberger
* 86 U.S. 526 Head v. University of Missouri
* 86 U.S. 531 Travellers' Insurance Company v. Seaver
* 86 U.S. 544 Butt v. Ellett
* 86 U.S. 548 The Confederate Note Case
* 86 U.S. 560 Nunez v. Dautel
* 86 U.S. 563 Williams v. Bankhead
* 86 U.S. 572 Stevenson v. Williams
* 86 U.S. 577 Osborne v. United States
* 86 U.S. 581 Peete v. Morgan
* 86 U.S. 584 Railroad Company v. Richmond
* 86 U.S. 591 United States v. Cook
* 86 U.S. 595 United States v. Innerarity
* 86 U.S. 598 United States v. Jonas
* 86 U.S. 606 Holladay v. Daily
* 86 U.S. 611 Packet Company v. Sickles
* 86 U.S. 619 (1805) Mackay v. Easton
* 86 U.S. 635 Aicardi v. The State
* 86 U.S. 640 Great Western Insurance Company v. Fogarty
* 86 U.S. 646 Warren v. Van Brunt
* 86 U.S. 655 Heine v. Levee Commissioners
* 86 U.S. 661 Board of Commissioners v. Gorman
* 86 U.S. 666 Township of Pine Grove v. Talcott
# United States Reports/Volume 90

23 Wall.[ace], ( 23 L.Ed. )
* 90 U.S. 1 The Clarita and the Clara
* 90 U.S. 20 The Great Republic
* 90 U.S. 35 United States v. Villalonga
* 90 U.S. 46 County of St. Clair v. Lovingston
* 90 U.S. 69 The Dexter
* 90 U.S. 77 The Teutonia
* 90 U.S. 85 Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Young's Administrator
* 90 U.S. 108 Secombe v. Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad Company
* 90 U.S. 119 Lewis v. Hawkins
* 90 U.S. 128 Ray v. Norseworthy
* 90 U.S. 137 Randall v. Kreiger
* 90 U.S. 150 Stickney v. Wilt
* 90 U.S. 165 The Sea Gull (90 U.S. 165)
* 90 U.S. 181 The Corn-Planter Patent
* 90 U.S. 246 The Collector v. Richards
* 90 U.S. 261 Mason v. Graham
* 90 U.S. 283 Thomas & Company v. Wooldridge
* 90 U.S. 289 Sandusky v. National Bank
* 90 U.S. 294 Gregory v. McVeigh
* 90 U.S. 307 Blake v. National Banks
* 90 U.S. 321 Slack v. Tucker & Company
* 90 U.S. 331 Scholey v. Rew
* 90 U.S. 352 Reedy v. Scott
* 90 U.S. 368 Smith v. Adsit
* 90 U.S. 374 Smythe v. Fiske
* 90 U.S. 383 Donovan v. United States
* 90 U.S. 405 North Carolina Railroad Company v. Swasey
* 90 U.S. 411 United States v. Williamson
* 90 U.S. 416 Fashnacht v. Frank
* 90 U.S. 420 Crosby v. Buchanan
* 90 U.S. 458 The Rio Grande
* 90 U.S. 466 Lewis v. Cocks
* 90 U.S. 471 Grand Tower Company v. Phillips
* 90 U.S. 480 Hepburn v. School Directors
* 90 U.S. 486 Green v. Green
* 90 U.S. 492 Moran v. Prather
* 90 U.S. 504 Ex parte Medway
* 90 U.S. 507 Chicago and Alton Railroad Company v. Wiswall
* 90 U.S. 508 United States v. Shrewsbury
* 90 U.S. 518 The Tremolo Patent
* 90 U.S. 530 Collar Company v. Van Dusen
* 90 U.S. 566 The Wood-Paper Patent
# United States Reports/Volume 87

20 Wall.[ace], ( 22 L.Ed. )
* 87 U.S. 1 (1869) Habich v. Folger
* 87 U.S. 8 Creighton v. Kerr
* 87 U.S. 14 McQuiddy v. Ware
* 87 U.S. 20 Humaston v. American Telegraph Company
* 87 U.S. 31 Kehr v. Smith
* 87 U.S. 36 Pacific Railroad Company v. Maguire
* 87 U.S. 46 North Missouri Railroad Company v. Maguire
* 87 U.S. 64 Oregon Steam Navigation Company v. Winsor
* 87 U.S. 72 National Bank of Washington v. Texas
* 87 U.S. 92 The Confiscation Cases Slidell's Land
* 87 U.S. 114 Claims of Marcuard
* 87 U.S. 115 Conrad's Lots
* 87 U.S. 117 Knapp v. Western Vermont Railroad Company
* 87 U.S. 125 Burton v. Driggs
* 87 U.S. 137 Tioga Railroad v. Blossburg and Corning Railroad
* 87 U.S. 152 Simpson v. Greeley
* 87 U.S. 159 Merchants' Mutual Insurance Company v. Baring
* 87 U.S. 165 Roach v. Summers
* 87 U.S. 171 Bank v. Cooper
* 87 U.S. 179 Twenty Per Cent Cases
* 87 U.S. 189 Pahlman v. The Collector
* 87 U.S. 201 The Lottawanna
* 87 U.S. 226 Cornett v. Williams
* 87 U.S. 251 United States v. Herron
* 87 U.S. 264 (1872) McPhaul v. Lapsley
* 87 U.S. 289 City of Memphis v. Brown
* 87 U.S. 323 Stockdale v. The Insurance Companies
* 87 U.S. 342 Washing-Machine Company v. Tool Company
* 87 U.S. 353 Hailes v. Van Wormer
* 87 U.S. 375 Ferris v. Higley
* 87 U.S. 385 The S. B. Wheeler
* 87 U.S. 387 New Orleans v. The Steamship Company
* 87 U.S. 403 Lyon v. Pollard
* 87 U.S. 407 Avery v. Hackley
* 87 U.S. 414 Mays v. Fritton
* 87 U.S. 421 Belle of the Sea
* 87 U.S. 430 (1870) The Montello
* 87 U.S. 445 Home Insurance Company v. Morse
* 87 U.S. 459 Sprott v. United States
* 87 U.S. 475 Titus v. United States
* 87 U.S. 486 Boley v. Griswold
* 87 U.S. 488 Hearne v. Marine Insurance Company
* 87 U.S. 494 Equitable Insurance Company v. Hearne
* 87 U.S. 498 Rubber-Tip Pencil Company v. Howard
* 87 U.S. 507 Atchison v. Peterson
* 87 U.S. 517 United States v. Gill
* 87 U.S. 520 Pollard v. Bailey
* 87 U.S. 528 Packet Company v. Clough
* 87 U.S. 543 Express Company v. Ware
* 87 U.S. 546 Ambler v. Whipple
* 87 U.S. 560 Franklin Insurance Company v. Colt
* 87 U.S. 571 Gillette v. Bullard
* 87 U.S. 575 Longstreth v. Pennock
* 87 U.S. 577 Cannon v. New Orleans
* 87 U.S. 583 Clark v. Iowa City
* 87 U.S. 590 Murdock v. City of Memphis
* 87 U.S. 643 Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Maryland
* 87 U.S. 646 Mathews v. McStea
* 87 U.S. 650 Cadle v. Baker
* 87 U.S. 652 Treat v. Jemison
* 87 U.S. 653 Parcels v. Johnson
* 87 U.S. 655 Loan Association v. Topeka
* 87 U.S. 670 Basey v. Gallagher
# United States Reports/Volume 89

22 Wall.[ace], ( 22 L.Ed. )
* 89 U.S. 1 Gill v. Wells
* 89 U.S. 32 Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Newton
* 89 U.S. 38 Cary v. Savings Union
* 89 U.S. 42 House v. Mullen
* 89 U.S. 47 Jeffries v. Economical Life Insurance Company
* 89 U.S. 57 Scott v. Kelly
* 89 U.S. 60 Putnam v. Day
* 89 U.S. 67 Ritchie v. Franklin County
* 89 U.S. 81 Haycraft v. United States
* 89 U.S. 99 United States v. Insurance Companies
* 89 U.S. 105 Maryland v. Railroad Company
* 89 U.S. 116 Pleasants v. Fant
* 89 U.S. 123 Ogdensburg and Lake Champlain Railroad Company v. Pratt
* 89 U.S. 136 St. John v. Erie Railway Company
* 89 U.S. 150 Sloan v. Lewis
* 89 U.S. 157 In re Chiles
* 89 U.S. 170 Burnhisel v. Firman
* 89 U.S. 180 The Elgee Cotton Cases
* 89 U.S. 198 Fretz v. Stover
* 89 U.S. 208 Sweeney v. Lomme
* 89 U.S. 215 Bailey v. Magwire
* 89 U.S. 231 French v. Hay
* 89 U.S. 238 French v. Hay (89 U.S. 238)
* 89 U.S. 250 French v. Hay (89 U.S. 250)
* 89 U.S. 254 Connoyer v. Schaeffer
* 89 U.S. 263 Hampton v. Rouse
* 89 U.S. 276 Mechanics' and Traders' Bank v. Union Bank
* 89 U.S. 308 Gavinzel v. Crump
* 89 U.S. 322 Railway Company v. Ramsey
* 89 U.S. 329 Stephen v. Beall
* 89 U.S. 341 New Jersey Railroad Company v. Pollard
* 89 U.S. 351 Woodson v. Murdock
* 89 U.S. 381 Morgan v. Campbell
* 89 U.S. 395 Amsinck v. Bean
* 89 U.S. 406 United States v. Farragut
* 89 U.S. 424 Fox v. Seal
* 89 U.S. 444 Union Pacific Railway Company v. McShane
* 89 U.S. 464 Hunnewell v. Cass County
* 89 U.S. 479 Taylor v. Thomas
* 89 U.S. 492 United States v. Saunders
* 89 U.S. 496 Piatt's Administrator v. United States
* 89 U.S. 513 Robinson v. Elliott
* 89 U.S. 527 Tucker v. Ferguson
* 89 U.S. 576 Ross v. Jones
* 89 U.S. 594 Evansville and Crawfordsville Railroad Company v. Androscoggin Mills
* 89 U.S. 604 Bailey v. New York Central Railroad Company
* 89 U.S. 641 United States v. O'Grady
# United States Reports/Volume 9

5 Cranch, ( 3 L.Ed. )
* 9 U.S. 1 Charles Alexander v. The Mayor and Commonalty of Alexandria
* 9 U.S. 11 Henderson v. Moore
* 9 U.S. 13 Cooke v. Woodrow
* 9 U.S. 15 Mandeville and Jamesson v. Wilson
* 9 U.S. 19 Fairfax's Executor v. Ann Fairfax
* 9 U.S. 22 (1722) M'Keen v. Delancy's Lessee
* 9 U.S. 34 John and James Tucker v. Oxley Assignee of T Moore a
* 9 U.S. 45 (1792) Young v. The Bank of Alexandria
* 9 U.S. 49 Yeaton v. The Bank of Alexandria
* 9 U.S. 57 The Hope Insurance Company of Providence v. Boardman et al.
* 9 U.S. 61 The Bank of the United States v. Deveaux et al.
* 9 U.S. 92 (1803) Matthews v. Zane's Lessee
* 9 U.S. 100 Hodgson v. The Marine Insurance Company of Alexandria
* 9 U.S. 115 (1803) The United States v. Judge Peters
* 9 U.S. 142 Violett v. Patton
* 9 U.S. 154 Pierce v. Turner
* 9 U.S. 173 (1778) Kempe's Lessee v. Kennedy et al.
* 9 U.S. 187 The Marine Insurance Company of Alexandria v. James Young
* 9 U.S. 191 (1799) Bodley v. Taylor
* 9 U.S. 234 Taylor and Quarles v. Brown
* 9 U.S. 257 The United States v. John Arthur and Robert Patterson
* 9 U.S. 262 Hepburn Dundas v. Colin Auld Hepburn Dundas
* 9 U.S. 280 The United States v. Evans
* 9 U.S. 281 Yeaton v. The United States
* 9 U.S. 284 The United States v. Potts
* 9 U.S. 287 Rush v. Parker
* 9 U.S. 288 Logan v. Patrick
* 9 U.S. 289 (1803) Harrison v. Sterry
* 9 U.S. 304 (1789) Keene v. The United States
* 9 U.S. 311 The United States v. Riddle
* 9 U.S. 313 Himely v. Rose
* 9 U.S. 321 Welsh v. Mandeville and Jamesson
* 9 U.S. 322 (1798) Riddle Co v. Mandeville and Jamesson
* 9 U.S. 333 Dulany v. Hodgkin
* 9 U.S. 335 (1792) Yeaton v. Fry
* 9 U.S. 344 (1695) Owings v. Norwood's Lessee
* 9 U.S. 351 Moss v. Riddle Co
* 9 U.S. 358 Brent v. Chapman
* 9 U.S. 361 Auld v. Norwood
* 9 U.S. 363 Slacum v. Simms and Wise
* 9 U.S. 368 (1807) The United States v. Vowell and M'Clean
* 9 U.S. 372 Sloop Sally v. The United States
# Weir of Hermiston/Dedication

TO MY WIFE
I saw rain falling and the rainbow drawn
On Lammermuir. Hearkening I heard again In my precipitous city beaten bells
Winnow the keen sea wind. And here afar, Intent on my own race and place, I wrote.
Take thou the writing: thine it is. For who
Burnished the sword, blew on the drowsy coal,
Held still the target higher, chary of praise
And prodigal of counsel—who but thou?
So now, in the end, if this the least be good,
If any deed be done, if any fire
Burn in the imperfect page, the praise be thine.
# Weir of Hermiston/Introduction

INTRODUCTORY
In the wild end of a moorland parish, far out of the sight of any house, there stands a cairn among the heather, and a little by east of it, in the going down of the braeside, a monument with some verses half defaced. It was here that Claverhouse shot with his own hand the Praying Weaver of Balweary, and the chisel of Old Mortality has clinked on that lonely gravestone. Public and domestic history have thus marked with a bloody finger this hollow among the hills; and since the Cameronian gave his life there, two hundred years ago, in a glorious folly, and without comprehension or regret, the silence of the moss has been broken once ​again by the report of firearms and the cry of the dying.
The Deil's Hags was the old name. But the place is now called Francie's Cairn. For a while it was told that Francie walked. Aggie Hogg met him in the gloaming by the cairnside, and he spoke to her, with chattering teeth, so that his words were lost. He pursued Rob Todd (if any one could have believed Robbie) for the space of half a mile with pitiful entreaties. But the age is one of incredulity; these superstitious decorations speedily fell off; and the facts of the story itself, like the bones of a giant buried there and half dug up, survived, naked and imperfect, in the memory of the scattered neighbours. To this day, of winter nights, when the sleet is on the window and the cattle are quiet in the byre, there will be told again, amid the silence of the young and the additions and corrections of the old, the tale of the Justice-Clerk and of his son, young Hermiston, that vanished ​from men's knowledge; of the two Kirsties and the Four Black Brothers of the Cauldstaneslap; and of Frank Innes, 'the young fool advocate,' that came into these moorland parts to find his destiny.
Layout 2
# Warren v. Palmer

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
310 U.S. 132
Warren v. Palmer
Argued: March 29, and April 1, 1940. --- Decided: April 29, 1940
Mr. Erwin N. Griswold, of Cambridge, Mass., for petitioners.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 133-134 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Hermon J. Wells, of New Haven, Conn., for respondents.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Warren v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
340 U.S. 523
Warren v. United States
Argued: Jan. 2, 1951. --- Decided: Feb 26, 1951
Messrs. Saul Sperling and Charles A. Ellis, New York City for petitioner.
Mr. Leavenworth Colby, Washington, D.C., for respondents.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Warren v. Shook

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
91 U.S. 704
Warren v. Shook

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/23rd Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 25

Chap. XXV.—An Act to complete certain roads in the territory of Arkansas.
Appropriations for Road from the southern line of Missouri to Red river. Road from fort Towson to the northern line of Louisiana.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the sum of twenty thousand dollars be, and the same is hereby, appropriated out of any money in the treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, to complete the road leading from the southern boundary line of the state of Missouri, by Jackson, Little Rock, and Washington, to the town of Fulton, on the north bank of Red river; and that the further sum of fifteen thousand dollars be appropriated in like manner to complete the military road leading from fort Towson on Red River, to the northern boundary line of the state of Louisiana, in the direction of Natchitoches.
Approved, February 24, 1835.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/23rd Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 21

Chap. XXI.—An Act for improving the harbour at the mouth of the river Raisin, in the territory of Michigan.
Appropriation for a new entrance into harbour at mouth of river Raisin.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the sum of thirty thousand dollars be, and the same is hereby, appropriated out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the construction of a new entrance into the harbour, at or near the mouth of the river Raisin, where it unites with Lake Erie, according to a plan and survey of the said works, made under the direction of the War Department by Capt. H. Smith, during the fall of the year eighteen hundred and thirty-four; Provided, however,Proviso. That no part of the sum hereby appropriated shall be expended for improving the channel of said river, but the expenditure hereby directed, shall be confined exclusively to the construction of a cut or passage from the lake to that part of the river which is to be used as a harbour for vessels.
Approved, February 24, 1835.