OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Halliburton v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
80 U.S. 63
Halliburton v. United States
What we have said in the case just decided leads to the conclusion that the judgment in this case must be affirmed.
Looking to the declaration and the plea it appears that the bond had become absolute more than a month before the ordinance of secession was passed, and that all that time Halliburton was in default. The plea does not aver that there was any obstacle in the say of payment at the time when by law the payment was required to be made, or for a considerable period thereafter. If, then, it were sufficiently averred that after the 1st of June, 1861, payment was prevented by public enemies, there would still appear a default of the obligors, for which no excuse is offered, a fault which led directly to the loss of the public money. All the reasons, therefore, which have been mentioned in the case of Bevans v. United States, why the evidence there offered was insufficient to establish a defence, concur in justifying the judgment given upon this demurrer.
This disposes of the principal error insisted on. To the other error assigned-namely, the refusal of the court to admit evidence of payments made and of an alleged set-off-the fourth section of the act of Congress of March 3d, 1797, is a sufficient answer. What was offered and rejected was not any claims presented to the accounting officers of the Treasury, and by them disallowed. And it was not pretended that the defendants were at the trial in possession of vouchers not before in their power to procure. The evidence was, therefore, properly rejected.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
The CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice CLIFFORD dissented in this case, as in the former one, and for the same reason, to wit, that they thought the plea in bar set up a valid defence.
[See supra, p. 17, Boyden et al. v. United States.]

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Company v. Walker

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, quotes, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
329 U.S. 1
Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Company v. Walker
Argued: Oct. 23, 24, 1946. --- Decided: Nov 18, 1946
Mr.Earl Babcock, of Duncan, Okl. (Harry C. Robb, of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner.
Mr. Harold W. Mattingly, of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Company v. Reily

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Brennan

## Dissenting Opinion

    Clark
United States Supreme Court
373 U.S. 64
Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Company v. Reily
Argued: Dec. 3, 1962. --- Decided: May 13, 1963
See 374 U.S. 858, 83 S.Ct. 1861.
Benjamin B. Taylor, Jr., Baton Rouge, La., for appellant.
Chapman L. Sanford, Baton Rouge, La., for appellee.
Mr. Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Stanisic

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
395 U.S. 62
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Petitioner, v. Veljko STANISIC.
Argued: Feb. 25, 1969. --- Decided: May 19, 1969
See 395 U.S. 987, 89 S.Ct. 2125.
Joseph J. Connolly, Washington, D.C., for petitioner, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court.
G. Bernhard Fedde, Portland, Or., for respondent.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Errico

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Stewart
United States Supreme Court
385 U.S. 214
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Errico
Argued: Oct. 20, 1966. --- Decided: Dec 12, 1966
Sol. Gen., Thurgood Marshall, for Immigration and Naturalization service.
Frank M. Ierulli, Portland, Or., for Giuseppe Errico.
Julius C. Biervliet, Mount Vernon, N.Y., for Muriel May Scott.
Mr. Cheif Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hoffman v. Missouri ex rel. Foraker

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
274 U.S. 21
Hoffman v. Missouri ex rel. Foraker
Argued: March 11, 1927. --- Decided: April 11, 1927
Mr. Roy W. Rucker, of Sedalia, Mo., for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Paul Barnett, of Sedalia, Mo., and L. D. Mitchell, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hoffman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
92 U.S. 161
Hoffman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio.
Mr. James A. Garfield, for the appellant, cited Insurance Company v. Wilkinson, 13 Wall. 222; Masters v. Madison County Alert Insurance Co., 11 Barb. 624; May on Ins., sects. 134, 143; Taylor v. Merchants' Fire Ins. Co., 9 How. 390; 42 N. Y. 54; 20 Barb. 468; 2 Ins. Law Jour. 23; 25 Barb. 189; Hallock v. Commercial Ins. Co., 2 Dutch. 268; 25 Conn. 207; id. 542; 43 Barb. 351; Cooper v. Pacific, 3 J. C. R. 254; 3 Ohio St. 549; 4 id. 353; Fraternal Life Ins. Co. v. Applegate, 7 id. 292; Bliss on Life Ins., sect. 317.
Mr. H. L. Terrell for the appellee.
MR. JUSTICE SWAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hoffman v. McClelland

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
264 U.S. 552
Hoffman v. McClelland
Argued: Jan. 23, 1924. --- Decided: April 21, 1924)
Messrs. Tom Connally, of Washington, D. C., and James D. Williamson, of Waco, Tex., for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 552-554 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Joseph M. McCormick, of Dallas, Tex., for appellees.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hoffman v. Rauch

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
300 U.S. 255
Hoffman v. Rauch
Argued: Feb. 12, 1937. --- Decided: March 1, 1937
Messrs. George P. Barse and John F. Anderson, both of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Leland Walker, of Somerset, Pa., for respondent.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hanson v. Lessee of Eustace

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
43 U.S. 653
Hanson v. Lessee of Eustace

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hansen v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
281 U.S. 751
Hansen v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company
Mr. Emil Hansen, pro se.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hansford v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
357 U.S. 578
Hansford v. United States
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for consideration in light of Ellis v. United States, 356 U.S. 674, 78 S.Ct. 974, decided May 26, 1958. It is ordered that the judgment in this case issue forthwith.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hanson v. Denckla
## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
357 U.S. 235
Hanson v. Denckla
Argued: March 10, 11, 1958. --- Decided: June 23, 1958
See 79 S.Ct. 10.
[Syllabus from pages 235-237 intentionally omitted]
Mr. William H. Foulk, Wilmingon, Del., for appellants Hanson et al.
Mr. Arthur G. Logan, Wilmington, Del., for petitioners Lewis et al.
Mr. Sol A. Rosenblatt, New York City, for appellees Denckla et al.
Mr. Edwin D. Steel, Jr., Wilmington, Del., for respondents Hanson et al.
Mr. CHIEF JUSTICE WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hansen v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
281 U.S. 751
Hansen v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hansen v. Haff

United States Supreme Court
291 U.S. 559
Hansen v. Haff
Argued: Feb. 6, 1934. --- Decided: March 5, 1934
Messrs. Roger O'Donnell, of Washington, D.C., and Stephen M. White, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
The Attorney General and Mr. George C. Sweeney, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hansford v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
357 U.S. 578
Hansford v. United States
Leonard K. Hansford, Jr., pro se.
Solicitor General Rankin, for the United States.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# If the Lord our leader be

Jacob's Ladder by John Newton
    If the LORD our leader be,
    We may follow without fear;
    East or West, by land or sea,
    Home, with him, is everywhere;
    When from Esau Jacob fled,
    Though his pillow was a stone,
    And the ground his humble bed,
    Yet he was not left alone.
    Kings are often waking kept,
    Racked with cares on beds of state;
    Never king like Jacob slept.
    For he lay at heaven's gate:
    Lo! he saw a ladder reared,
    Reaching to the heav'nly throne;
    At the top the Lord appeared,
    Spake and claimed him for his own.
    "Fear not, Jacob, thou art mine,
    And my presence with thee goes;
    On thy heart my love shall shine,
    And my arm subdue thy foes:
    From my promise comfort take;
    For my help in trouble call;
    Never will I thee forsake,
    'Till I have accomplished all."
    Well does Jacob's ladder suit
    To the gospel throne of grace;
    We are at the ladder's foot,
    Every hour, in every place
    By affirming flesh and blood,
    JESUS heav'n and earth unites;
    We by faith ascend to God,
    God to dwell with us delights.
    They who know the Savior's name,
    Are for all events prepared
    What can changes do to them,
    Who have such a Guide and Guard?
    Should they traverse earth around,
    To the ladder still they come;
    Every spot is holy ground,
    God is there--and he's their home.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# If the Shoe Fits—

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Extracted from McBride's Magazine, 1916 April, pp. 1–38.
IF THE SHOE FITS—
A Novelette:
by
JACKSON GREGORY
* Chapter I 1
* Chapter II 5
* Chapter III 11
* Chapter IV 14
* Chapter V 17
* Chapter VI 22
* Chapter VII 27
* Chapter VIII 32
* Chapter IX 37
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1943, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 80 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# History of Gardner, Massachusetts/Power and Duty of the Master of the Work-house

Power and Duty of the Master.
"The Master shall have the immediate care and control of the inmates, and all the property belonging to the institution; and shall give an account of the same to the Overseers, when called upon by them: he shall see that the inmates are suitably provided with lodging, clothes and food, and shall call on the Overseers for such things as are necessary for that purpose. It shall be the duty of the Master to see that all who are able to labor, are employed in such a manner as shall be most advantageous to the town; and to instruct in regard to the moral character of all persons in his care, and see that the Sabbath is duly observed; and to take care of all the fires, see that the lights are put out, that the inmates retire in proper season, and the children in his care are suitably schooled; it shall also be his duty to punish any one of the inmates who are refractory, or disobedient, and perform all other duties which may devolve on him by the direction of the Overseers."
# History of Gardner, Massachusetts/Table of Contents

Table of contents.
# History of Gardner, Massachusetts/Roads

Roads.
The town is well supplied with roads, amounting to between fifty and sixty miles in length, of which the following are the principal ones:
The road leading from Brattleborough to Boston, through the south part of the town, is about four miles in length, and was originally a turnpike. In the year 1829, it was abandoned as such, and made free for public travel. It was laid out as a county road by the Commissioners in the year 1833, and re-built by the town, at an expense of between seven and eight thousand dollars.
The county road leading from Westminster to Royalston passes through the center of the Town; length, seven miles.
The roads from the, center of the town, leading to Ashburnham, Winchendon, Jonesville, Templeton, and Hubbardston, are of about an equal length; viz: from four to five miles.
​The roads belonging to Gardner are kept in repair at a cost of from fifteen to eighteen hundred dollars annually.
The Vermont and Massachusetts rail-road passes through the town from east to west, at about an equal distance from the center and south village, five or six miles in length.
# History of Gardner, Massachusetts/To the Reader

To the reader.
This work was left unfinished by the author at the time of his death; he had collected together most of the scattered materials of which it is composed, leaving it in a form, that little else was to be done but to prepare it for the press.
In putting this work together, I may fail to mention some things that ought to be recorded, for want of information. I have taken considerable pains to learn what I could with regard to the Town since its formation as such, to the present time.
A very interesting part of the history of some towns will be lost sight of here; I refer to those places that were once settled by the Indians; some of them were one hundred and forty years previous to the incorporation of this town.
To you who have given your patronage by kindly furnishing us with statistical and other facts, with regard to the ecclesiastical, the manufacturing, the mechanical, and other interests of the people here, I would return my sincere thanks.
M. K. G.
# History of Gardner, Massachusetts/Power and Duty of the Overseers of the Poor

Power and Duty of the Overseers of the Poor.
"It shall be their duty to provide for all poor, indigent persons, who are unable to take care of themselves. At all times when circumstances will admit, they shall be supported on the farm, which the town have purchased for that purpose and shall hereafter be known by the name of Gardner work-house. They are to provide suitable stock, farming utensils and household furniture: also, make such additions and repairs as are necessary for the establishment. They are to manage the concern in the best possible manner, and to provide suitable places for all poor children, as soon as they can earn their living, and see that they are brought up to some trade or calling, and suitably schooled. They shall constantly keep suitable persons for a Master and Mistress, and such other help as they shall deem necessary.
A Physician shall be employed to attend the ​sick, (when requested by the Overseers, or Master,) who shall keep a record of his visits, the price, and for whom they were made; and shall receive such compensation as may be agreed upon by him and the Overseers, and may be removed at the pleasure of the Overseers. It shall be the duty of the Overseers to meet at the work-house on the last Saturday in February, May, August, and November annually, for the purpose of inspecting the concerns of the establishment, and giving directions to the master. It shall be the duty also for one of the Overseers to visit the work-house as often as once a month, for the purpose of inspecting the management of the concerns, the usage of the inmates, and giving directions to the master, &c. At their meeting in February, they shall take an inventory of all the personal property, and the betterments, if any, which shall be recorded in a book kept by them for that and other purposes. They shall keep a record of all persons who are supported in the work-house; the time when they came, and when they go away; and to record all other matters which they shall deem necessary: all of which shall be reported by them at the annual March meeting."
# History of Gardner, Massachusetts/Music

Music.
There were two bands of music formed in 1855. One in the center of the town, called the Gardner Cornet Band, is composed of eighteen members. The other is in the south village, and is called the Mechanics' Cornet Band; it consisted of nineteen members at its formation; it now numbers sixteen.
These organizations have not the power to protect or secure property that belong to the engine companies; yet their music has a tendency to invigorate, enliven and animate the mind, rendering it more capable of enjoying its possessions.
# History of Gardner, Massachusetts/Schools

Schools.
In 1787, the town was divided into four school districts, and granted twenty pounds to be expended in schooling. Previous to that time what education the children received was given in a private capacity; for nine years the schools were kept in dwelling-houses. In 1796, the town granted 250 pounds to build school-houses.
In 1818 the town was new districted and divided into six school districts; the school money has been increased from year to year until the present time, when $2,000 is appropriated to that use. The people of Gardner attach great ​importance to the system of common school education; this may be noticed in their school-houses, all of which have been built new, or repaired within a few years. In 1858, district No. 1 erected a beautiful and commodious house, with four departments, at a cost of $10,000. In the same year, district No. 3 erected a house with three departments, at a cost of $5,000. Much pains has been taken in selecting teachers, giving the children and youth an opportunity to acquire an education sufficient to qualify them for the active business of life. A high school is often kept in the center of the town. There is also a fund of $1,000, belonging to the south village, the income of which is to be paid for the support of a school. The donor was Abijah M. Severy. We find from the report of the School Committee, that in the year 1858, the number of public schools kept in town was twenty-five; an increase in number of six over the preceding year; their average length was six and a half months.
The number of persons in town between five and fifteen years of age, according to the last enumeration, was 482.
# Hartley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
295 U.S. 216
Hartley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Argued: April 11, 12, 1935. --- Decided: April 29, 1935
Messrs. H. C. Fulton and H. B. Fryberger, both of Duluth, Minn., for petitioner.
The Attorney General and Mr. David E. Hudon, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection Insurance Company v. Harrison

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
301 U.S. 459
Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection Insurance Company v. Harrison
Argued: Feb. 2, 1937. --- Decided: May 24, 1937
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia.
Mr. Marion Smith, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellants.
Mr. B. D. Murphy, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse