# The Proletarian Revolution in Russia/Part 6/Chapter 1

Written c. February 1918
I.
PEACE NEGOTIATIONS AND REVOLUTION.
(Trotzky.)
Our adversaries accuse us, who stand on revolutionary internationalist ground, of having considered it possible to enter into peace negotiations with the monarchistic and capitalistic representatives of Germany, Austria and their allies. If this be a contradiction, it is brought about, not by the inconsistency of our tactics, but by the objective state of affairs in Europe. In Russia, the proletariat placed itself at the head of the state, whereas in the other warring countries the power of the state still remains in the hands of the capitalist classes, their bureaucracies and their monarchies. The negotiations of workmen with capitalists during a strike do not at all contradict the principle of the class struggle. The same may be said of the negotiations of a proletarian government with that of the bourgeoisie, as long as the peoples of Europe put up with such governments.
It is usually the same people who reproach us with "betraying" our allies and of "concluding peace" with the Central Powers. This reproach is founded on a quite different estimate both of the allied and of the enemy governments. The fact, however, is that we recognise, in principle, no difference in this respect. An understanding with the government of the German Kaiser weighs as much in the scales of the policy of the internatonal proletariat as the understanding with the governments of the King of Great Britain or of the Mikado. The national differences of state form and of diplomatc usage are completely moved to the background by the uniformity of the imperialistic aims and the methods of the present world policies of the great powers. As to the small states, they play a purely passive role, compelled as they are to dangle in the trail of the great imperialistic States and their groupings.
We must open negotiations with those governments which at present exist. However, we are conducting these negotiations in a way affording the peoples the fullest possibility of controlling the crimes of their governments, and so as to accelerate the rising of ​the working masses against the imperialistic cliques. We are ready to support this uprising with all the forces at our command. The official and semi-official French patriots, who a few months ago supported Romanoff against us, are now indignant at our negotiations with the Hohenzollerns. They very often summon against us the help of the spirits of their ancestors, the Jacobins, who conducted no negotiations with the "tyrants" but declared ruthless war against them.
This opposition, which aims at the glorifying of the petty bourgeois democracy of the i8th century at the expense of the proletarian democracy of the 20th century, is in every respect irrelevant.
Our Revolution was directly generated by the war. In France, on the contrary, at the close of the 18th century, the war was generated by the Revolution.
After the French masses, principally the peasantry, had achieved the greatest revolutionary conquests, the stress of feudal Europe forced them to defend these conquests by force of arms against the foreign enemy. The enthusiasm of the revolution passed immedately into the zeal of war, which only meant the conveyance of the revolution across its national borders.
Our people bled in the course of the last three years in the imperialistic murder campaign, and the revolution became first of all a means of freeing them from the horrors and sufferings of the war. The Jacobin Revolution of 1792 had a feudal Europe against it. The proletarian revolution of 1917 faces an imperialistic Europe, divided into two hostile camps. If to the "sanscullotte" the war was the direct continuation of the liberating revolution, then to the Russian soldier who has not yet left the trenches occupied by him for three years, the revolutionary war on an extensive scale would seem nothing else but a continuation of the preceding murder.
This by no means implies that we renounce the revolutionary war. On the contrary, we consider it the duty of the revolutionary classes to defend the cause of Socialism against the inner as well as the foreign class-enemies. Doubtless our revolutionary war can become popular provided there is an open revolutionary fight of the proletariat at least in one of the European countries. The powerful impulse which Europe has received from the Russian Revolution, must now come back from Europe, thus materializing the thought of an international revolution in the consciousness of the working class of Russia, and supplying the stimulus to rouse them for a ​revolutionary war. We do not doubt for a moment that, in consequence of the present war, the workmen of Europe will repeat the fight of the Russian proletariat, a month sooner or later, on more powerful economic foundations and in a more perfect political form. If, in awaiting the imminent revolutionary flood in Europe, Russia should be forced to conclude peace with the present-day governments of the Central Powers, it would be a provisional, temporary, transitory peace, with the revision of which the European Revolution will have to concern itself in the first place.
Our whole policy is built on the calculation upon this revolution. The peace-program, as submitted by us, can be fully accomplished only by overthrowing the capitalist governments. By resisting the realization of the democratic peace-program, the present-day governments are all the more surely preparing their catastrophic collapse. Through our peace-negotiations we are trying to give them every possible support in this respect.
Into the peace-program we include also the "United States of Europe.: This motto does not belong to the official program of the Government of Workmen's and Soldiers' Councils, nor has it as yet received recognition from our party. Nevertheless we believe that the program of democratic peace leads to a republican World Federation beyond a European one (and a considerable part of the pamphlet is devoted to the statement of this opinion). This question is practically put to the European proletariat by the further development of the Revolution.