OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company v. Smith/Dissent Burton

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Burton
United States Supreme Court
356 U.S. 274
Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company v. Smith
Argued: Jan. 30, 1958. --- Decided: April 28, 1958
Mr. Justice BURTON, with whom Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice CLARK join, dissenting.
For the reasons stated by the court below, 3 Cir., 241 F.2d 690, and also in Conway v. Glenn, 6 Cir., 193 F.2d 965, and Burr v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 156 F.2d 871, it seems to me that, for federal estate tax purposes, this case is indistinguishable from one in which a settlor places a sum in trust under such terms that he shall receive the income from it for life, and the principal shall be payable to designated beneficiaries upon his death. As the principal, in that event, would be includable in the settlor's estate for federal estate tax purposes, so here the proceeds of the insurance policies should be included in this decedent's estate. Accordingly, I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fidelity Assur Association v. Sims

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
318 U.S. 608
Fidelity Assur Association v. Sims
Argued: Feb. 9-10, 1943. --- Decided: April 5, 1943
Mr. Homer A. Holt, of Charleston, W. Va., for petitioners.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fidelity Casualty Company of New York v. Southern Railway News Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
214 U.S. 498
Fidelity Casualty Company of New York v. Southern Railway News Company
Mr. William H. Field for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Charles F. Taylor for defendant in error.
Per Curiam:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fidelity (Wordsworth)

* "Fidelity" in Poems, in Two Volumes (1807), Volume I.
* "Fidelity" in Poems (1815) Volume II.
* "Fidelity" in Poems That Every Child Should Know (1904).
# Galm v. Brighton Fireproof Storage Co.

Galm v. Brighton Fireproof Storage Co.
No. 54 Civil.
District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.
Nov. 25, 1940.
Action by Velmore Galm against the Brighton Fireproof Storage Company. On motion of defendant to make the Great American Indemnity Company a party defendant.
Motion overruled.
Dolle, O’Donnell & Cash, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff.
August A. Rendigs, Jr., Anthony B. Dunlap, and Herman W. Santen, all of Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant.
Nevin, District Judge.
On September 18, 1940, defendant herein, the Brighton Fireproof Storage Company, filed a motion “to make Great American Indemnity Company, a corporation, a party defendant herein.” The cause is now ​before the court on that motion. The granting of the motion is opposed by plaintiff. Counsel for the respective parties have presented oral arguments and filed briefs in favor of and contra the motion.
Defendant premises its motion on Rule 19(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, and Section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of the State of New York, Consol. Laws N.Y. c. 66. It is conceded, in fact stated, in the motion itself, that the Great American Indemnity Company “is not an indispensable party herein.” Defendant claims, however, that it “ought to be made a party, if complete relief is to be accorded between the present parties herein,” basing this claim on certain reasons set forth in the motion.
If complete relief can be accorded between the parties the motion should be overruled. Sauer v. Newhouse, D.C., 24 F.Supp. 911.
Upon a review of the applicable law, the court is of opinion that such complete relief can be accorded and that the Great American Indemnity Company ought not to be made a party to this action. As stated by counsel for plaintiff in their brief, to bring the Great American Indemnity Company in as a party defendant would only tend to confuse the issues and might open the way to the admission of improper and irrelevant testimony.
The court finds the motion not well taken and that it should be, and it is, overruled. Counsel may prepare an order accordingly.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Galvan v. Press

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Reed

## Dissenting Opinions

    Black
    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
347 U.S. 522
Galvan v. Press
Argued: Jan. 11, 12, 1954. --- Decided: May 24, 1954
Messrs. Harry Wolpin and A. L. Wirin, Los Angeles, for petitioner.
Mr. Oscar H. Davis, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Galvan v. Press/Dissent Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Reed
* Dissenting Opinions Black Douglas
United States Supreme Court
347 U.S. 522
Galvan v. Press
Argued: Jan. 11, 12, 1954. --- Decided: May 24, 1954
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, with whom Mr. Justice BLACK concurs, dissenting.
As Mr. Justice BLACK states in his dissent, the only charge against this alien is an act that was lawful when done. I agree that there is, therefore, no constitutional basis for deportation, if aliens, as well as citizens, are to be the beneficiaries of due process of law.
The case might, of course, be different if the past affiliation with Communism now seized upon as the basis for deportation had continued down to this date. But so far as this record shows, the alien Galvan quit the Communist Party at least six years ago. There is not a word in the present record to show that he continued his affiliations with it sub rosa or espoused its causes or joined in any of its activities since he ceased to be a member of it.
I cannot agree that because a man was once a Communist, he always must carry the curse. Experience teaches otherwise. It is common knowledge that though some of the leading Socialists of Asia once were Communists, they repudiated the Marxist creed when they experienced its ugly operations, and today are the most effective opponents the Communists know. So far as the present record shows, Galvan may be such a man. Or he may be merely one who transgressed and then returned to a more orthodox political faith. The record is wholly silent about Galvan's present political activities. Only one thing is clear: Galvan is not being punished for what he presently is, nor for an unlawful act, nor for espionage or conspiracy or intrigue against this country. He is being punished for what he once was, for a political faith he briefly expressed over six years ago and then rejected.
This action is hostile to our constitutional standards, as I pointed out in Harisiades v. Shaughnessy, 342 U.S. 580, 598, 72 S.Ct. 512, 523, 96 L.Ed. 586. Aliens who live here in peace, who do not abuse our hospitality, who are lawabiding members of our communities, have the right to due process of law. They too are 'persons' within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment. They can be molested by the government in times of peace only when their presence here is hostile to the safety or welfare of the Nation. If they are to be deported, it must be for what they are and do, not for what they once believed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Galvan v. Press/Concurrence Reed

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Reed
* Dissenting Opinions Black Douglas
United States Supreme Court
347 U.S. 522
Galvan v. Press
Argued: Jan. 11, 12, 1954. --- Decided: May 24, 1954
Mr. Justice REED concurs in the judgment of the Court and in the opinion as written, except as to the deductions drawn from Senator McCarran's citation of Colyer v. Skeffington, D.C., 265 F. 17, 72.
Mr. Justice BLACK, with whom Mr. Justice DOUGLAS concurs, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Galpin v. Page

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
85 U.S. 350
Galpin v. Page

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fidelity Columbia Trust Company v. City of Louisville

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
245 U.S. 54
Fidelity Columbia Trust Company v. City of Louisville
Argued: Oct. 16 and 17, 1917. --- Decided: Nov 5, 1917
[Syllabus from page 54 intentionally omitted]
Mr. William W. Crawford, of Louisville, Ky., for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Pendleton Beckley, George Cary Tabb, and Stuart Chevalier, all of Louisville, Ky., for defendant in error.
[Arguments of council on pages 254-257 intentionally omitted.]
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fidelity Columbia Trust Company v. Helvering

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 723
Fidelity Columbia Trust Company v. Helvering
Mr. Camden R. McAtee, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fidelity Columbia Trust Company v. Helvering/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 723
Fidelity Columbia Trust Company v. Helvering
For decision below, see 89 F.(2d) 1013.
Petition for writ of certiorari of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Rehearing denied 302 U.S. 776, 58 S.Ct. 136, 82 L.Ed. --.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland v. Bucki & Son Lumber Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
189 U.S. 135
Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland v. Bucki & Son Lumber Company
Argued: March 20, 1903. --- Decided: April 6, 1903
On October 1, 1897, the Atlantic Lumber Company commenced two actions at law in the circuit court of Duval county, Florida, against The L. Bucki & Son Lumber Company. In each of these actions a writ of attachment was issued, the Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland being the surety on the attachment bonds. Both of the attachments were dissolved. Soon after such dissolution the Bucki Company brought the present action against the Fidelity Company upon the attachment bonds. The action was commenced in the circuit court of Duval county, Florida, but subsequently removed to the United States circuit court for the southern district of Florida. On a trial in that court the Bucki Company obtained a judgment which by the court of appeals of the fifth circuit was modified, and, as modified, affirmed. 48 C. C. A. 436, 109 Fed. 393. Subsequently thereto, each of the parties obtained a writ of certiorari from this court. 184 U.S. 698, 46 L. ed. 64, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 946.
Messrs. Richard H. Liggett and Winfield Liggett for the Fidelity & Deposit Company.
Messrs. H. Bisbee and George C. Bedell for L. Bucki & Son Lumber Company.
Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland v. Pennsylvania

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
240 U.S. 319
Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland v. Pennsylvania
Argued: January 6, 1916. --- Decided: February 21, 1916
Messrs. Charles Markell and Charles F. Patterson for plaintiff in error.
Mr. William M. Hargest and Mr. Francis Shunk Brown, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McReynolds delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland v. Arenz

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
290 U.S. 66
Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland v. Arenz
Argued: and Submitted Oct. 10, 1933. --- Decided: Nov 6, 1933
Messrs. John Lichty and Elton Watkins, both of Portland, Or., for petitioner.
Mr. John C. Veatch, of Portland, Or., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Go to the Grave

This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
Go to the grave where friends are laid, And learn how quickly mortals fade, Learn how the fairest flower must droop, Learn how the strongest form must stoop, Learn that we are but dust and clay, The short-liv'd creatures of a day. Yet do not sigh -- there is a clime, Where they will dwell through endless time, Who here on earth their Maker serve, And never from his precepts swerve. The grave to them is but a road, That leads them to that blest abode.
# Go Plaintive Sounds

First published in Poems on Several Occasions (1760), pp. 77-78.
* "Go plaintive sounds", in The Clydesdale wedding (1822), a chapbook printed in Edinburgh
* "Go Plaintive Sounds", in The Bonny Lassie's Plaidy Awa (n.d.), a chapbook printed in Stirling
# Go To Thy Rest

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Printed in Bryant, William Cullen, ed. The family library of poetry and song: being choice selections from the best poets, English, Scottish, and American; Including translations from the German, Spanish, French, Portuguese, Persian, Latin, &c. New York: Fords, Howard and Hulbert, 1880. Page 282.
Go to thy rest, fair child!
 Go to thy dreamless bed,
While yet so gentle, undefiled,
 With blessings on thy head.
 Fresh roses in thy hand,
 Buds on thy pillow laid,
Haste from this dark and fearful land,
 Where flowers so quickly fade.
 Ere sin has seared the breast,
 Or sorrow waked the tear,
Rise to thy throne of changeless rest,
 In yon celestial sphere!
 Because thy smile was fair,
 Thy lip and eye so bright,
Because thy loving cradle-care
 Was such a dear delight,
 Shall love, with weak embrace,
 Thy upward wing detain?
No! gentle angel, seek thy place
 Amid the cherub train.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Go not too near a House of Rose—

Go not too near a House of Rose — The depredation of a Breeze — Or inundation of a Dew Alarms its walls away —
Nor try to tie the Butterfly, Nor climb the Bars of Ecstasy, In insecurity to lie Is Joy's insuring quality.
# Go slow, my soul, to feed thyself

Go slow, my soul, to feed thyself Upon his rare approach — Go rapid, lest Competing Death Prevail upon the Coach — Go timid, should his final eye Determine thee amiss — Go boldly — for thou paid'st his price Redemption — for a Kiss —
# Go thy great way!

Go thy great way! The Stars thou meetst Are even as Thyself — For what are Stars but Asterisks To point a human Life?
# Garrison v. Louisiana/Concurrence Goldberg

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Goldberg
United States Supreme Court
379 U.S. 64
Garrison v. Louisiana
Argued: Oct. 19, 1964. --- Decided: Nov 23, 1964
Mr. Justice GOLDBERG, concurring.
I agree with the Court that there is 'no difficulty in bringing the appellant's statement within the purview of criticism of the official conduct of public officials * * *.' Ante, at 76. In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 297, 84 S.Ct. 710, 735, 11 L.Ed.2d 686, I expressed my conviction 'that the Constitution accords citizens and press an unconditional freedom to criticize official conduct.' Id., at 305, 84 S.Ct. at 739. New York Times was a civil libel case; this is a criminal libel prosecution. In my view, '(i)f the rule that libel on government has no place in our Constitution is to have real meaning, then libel (criminal or civil) on the official conduct of the governors likewise can have no place in our Constitution.' Id., at 299, 84 S.Ct., at 736.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Garrison v. Patterson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
391 U.S. 464
Garrison v. Patterson, Warden
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
No. 791, Misc. Argued: N/A --- Decided: May 27, 1968.
Petitioner, who was under sentence of death for murder, sought a writ of habeas corpus in the District Court. That court denied the writ, denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal, but granted a stay of execution to allow for an appeal. Petitioner filed with the Court of Appeals a document stating the formal history of the case, noting one of the issues, and alleging that the petition "merits further hearing by the Court," which requested a further stay of execution, a certificate of probable cause, and leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The next day counsel were heard orally by a panel of the court in an unrecorded hearing. The court granted the stay of execution and thereafter, without further argument or submissions, granted the certificate of probable cause and affirmed the lower court's denial of habeas corpus.
Held: Where an appeal possesses sufficient merit to warrant a certificate of probable cause, appellant must be afforded adequate opportunity to address the merits, and if a summary procedure is adopted he must be informed, by rule or otherwise, that his opportunity will or may be limited.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr., and Isaac Mellman for petitioner.
Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John P. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Garrison v. Louisiana

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Goldberg
United States Supreme Court
379 U.S. 64
Garrison v. Louisiana
Argued: Oct. 19, 1964. --- Decided: Nov 23, 1964
Eberhard P. Deutsch, New Orleans, La., for appellant.
Jack P. F. Gremillion, Baton Rouge, La., for appellee.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Garrison v. Memphis Insurance Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
60 U.S. 312
Garrison v. Memphis Insurance Company

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Folk-Lore/Volume 10/Proceedings at Meeting, March 1899

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 15th, 1899.
The President (Mr. E. S. Hartland) in the Chair.
The minutes of the last Meeting were read and confirmed.
The election of Mr. Hoey Dignem and Miss K. Schlesinger was announced.
The resignation of Mr. T. K. Hurlburt was also announced.
The President then read a paper by Mr. W. G. Aston, entitled "Japanese Myth," which was followed by a discussion, in which Mr. Crooke and the President took part.
Dr. Gaster then read a paper entitled "Two Thousand Years of the Charm against the Child-Stealing Witch."
Votes of thanks for these papers were passed.
JAPANESE MYTH.
BY W. G. ASTON, C.M.G.
I.
THE SACRED BOOKS OF JAPAN.
In Japan, as elsewhere, the respective domains of myth, legend, and history merge into one another in such a way that it is often hard to say where one ends and another begins. The ancient annals give us continuous narratives in which all three are treated alike. It is generally agreed, however, that the mythical period comes to an end with the accession to the throne of Jimmu Tennō, the first Mikado, an event to which the date of B.C. 660 is usually assigned. Modern Japanese historians make history to begin from this point; but in reality legend predominates for many hundreds
# Fourteen sonnets and poems/In a Greenhouse in April

A man that looks on glass, On it may stay his eye; Or if he pleases, through it pass, And then the heavens espy. George Herbert.
In a Greenhouse in April
WHILE spring delays with wintry skies o'erhead,
And fields and woods are somber, brown, and bare,
And perched on friendless limb, in seeming dread, The robin sits, and snow banks chill the air;
Here, 'mid fresh leaves and flowers of every hue, In summer's ripe and rich epitome;
I sense the coming time, I seize the clue
To the marvelous beauty soon to be.
While hopes delay in realization long,
And toil and struggle often seem but vain;
Withheld the height that doth to life belong;
No higher level reached than loss and gain; Here, in my heart abides a germ to grow,
Till all in life in triumph I shall know.
# Fourteen sonnets and poems/A Reflection

Then old age and experience, hand in hand,
Lead him to death and make him understand,
After a search so painful and so long,
That all his life he had been in the wrong. Rochester.
A Reflection
HAD I but known, now pausing at threescore,
That that which most I sought when life began,
Was readier to be found and held, far more, Than what I then for it mistook and after ran;
Had taken half for true the elders said, And marked the union of my own heart
With that high speech, as well as what I read Of the deep lessons Nature did impart;
Had I but trusted to that silent voice That we, for want of better, conscience call,
Which by us stands in every hour of choice,
Answering the how, the why, the truth, the all,— Then had my life gone on expanding in its course,
Like some calm, deepening river, widening from its source.