OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Sonnet 19 (Shakespeare)

One of the 154 sonnets by Shakespeare from the collection Shakespeare's Sonnets (1609).
* "Sonnet 19," in Shake-speares Sonnets, Never before Imprinted (1609)
* "Sonnet 19," in Shakespeare's Sonnets, (ed.) by William J. Rolfe (1883)
* "Sonnet 19," in Shakespeare's Sonnets, (ed.) by Edward Bliss Reed, The Yale Shakespeare (1923)
The Sonnets of William Shakespeare
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sonnet 1: To his friend Maister R. L. In praise of Musique and Poetrie

Published in Poems in divers humors (1598).
* "If Musicke and sweet Poetry agree" in The Passionate Pilgrime (attr. William Shakespeare), in A Collection of Poems (1709).
* "Sonnet I" in The Complete Poems of Richard Barnfield (ed.) by Alexander B. Grosart (1876).
* "Sonnet I" in Barnfield's Poems (ed.) by Edward Arber (1878).
# Sonnet 1 (Shakespeare)

One of the 154 sonnets by Shakespeare from the collection Shakespeare's Sonnets (1609).
* "Sonnet 1," in Shake-speares Sonnets, Never before Imprinted (1609)
* "Sonnet 1," in Shakespeare's Sonnets, (ed.) by William J. Rolfe (1883)
* "Sonnet 1," in Shakespeare's Sonnets, (ed.) by Edward Bliss Reed, The Yale Shakespeare (1923)
The Sonnets of William Shakespeare
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sonnet 2

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Sonnet 2."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Sonnet 2, by William Shakespeare.
* Sonnet 2, by Barnfield
* Sonnet 2, by Barnfield
* Sonnet 2 by Petratch
* Sonnet II by Boothby
* Sonnet 2 by Spenser
* Sonnet 2 by Kollar
* Any work called Sonnet that happens to be the second such work in a particular collection
# Skynner

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Skynner."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Skynner, John
* Skynner, Lancelot
# Stockton v. Bishop (43 U.S. 74)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
43 U.S. 74
Stockton v. Bishop
IN the Circuit Court of the United States for the western district of Pennsylvania, Harriet Bishop, the defendant in error and a citizen of the state of Ohio, obtained a judgment against Stockton and Moore for $6500 damages and costs, on the 7th of December, 1843.
On the 15th of December, 1843, Stockton and Moore entered into a bond with Hugh Campbell as surety, for the prosecution of a writ of error to this court, which was approved by the judge, and, on the same day, a writ of error and citation was sued out. On the 16th of December, 1843, the citation was returned served on R. Biddle, Esq., attorney of defendant in error.
On the 11th of January, 1844, the plaintiff below sued out a writ of fieri facias and placed it in the hands of the marshal, returnable on the 20th of May.
Coxe moved to quash the writ of fieri facias, as having been irregularly issued.
Mr. Justice STORY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Stockton v. Ford (52 U.S. 232)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
52 U.S. 232
Stockton v. Ford

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Stockton v. Ford (59 U.S. 418)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
59 U.S. 418
Stockton v. Ford
THIS was an appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana.
A full history of the transactions which led to the dispute, is given in the report of the case of Stockton v. Ford, 11 How. 232.
It was submitted, on printed arguments, by Mr. Stockton and Mr. Johnson, for appellant, and by Mr. Duncan, for appellee.
The arguments were so connected with the facts of the case, that it is impossible to give the points by themselves.
Mr. Justice NELSON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Stockton v. Bishop (45 U.S. 155)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
45 U.S. 155
Stockton v. Bishop

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Stockton v. Ford

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Stockton v. Ford."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Stockton v. Ford (52 U.S. 232)
* Stockton v. Ford (59 U.S. 418)
# Stockwell v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Field
United States Supreme Court
80 U.S. 531
Stockwell v. United States

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Southern Kansas Railway Company v. Briscoe

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
144 U.S. 133
Southern Kansas Railway Company v. Briscoe
Geo. R. Peck, A. T. Britton, and A. B. Brown, for plaintiff in error.
A. H. Garland and H. J. May, for defendant in error.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Southern Ideas of Liberty

SOUTHERN IDEAS OF LIBERTY.
Sentence passed upon one for supporting that clause of our Declaration viz. All men are born free & equal. “Strip him to the skin! give him a coat of Tar & Feathers!! Hang him by the neck, between the Heavens and the Earth!!! as a beacon to warn the Northern Fanatics of their danger!!!!”
# Southern Iowa Electric Company v. City of Chariton

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
255 U.S. 539
Southern Iowa Electric Company v. City of Chariton
Argued: Jan. 26 and 28, 1921. --- Decided: April 11, 1921
In No. 180:
Messrs. Emmet Tinley, of Council Bluffs, Iowa, and William D. McHugh, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Messrs. J. W. Kridebaugh, of Chariton, Iowa, and H. W. Byers, of Harlan, Iowa, for appellees.
In No. 189:
Messrs. John A. Reed and William Chamberlain, both of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for appellant.
Mr. Ralph H. Munro, of Fairfield, Iowa, for appellees.
In No. 190:
Messrs. William Chamberlain, of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and Joe R. Lane, of Davenport, Iowa, for appellant.
Mr. Chief Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Star Lore Of All Ages/The Minor Constellations

New York, London: G. P. Putnam's Sons
The Minor Constellations
# Star Lore Of All Ages/The Minor Constellations/Columba Noæ

New York, London: G. P. Putnam's Sons
The Dove first appeared on Royer's star map of 1679, although Allen tells us that it had appeared seventy-six years before on Bayer's plate of Canis Major. It is thought also that Cæsius alluded to it seventeen centuries ago.
The asterism comprises the stars to the south and west of the Greater Dog, and is appropriately situated close to the Ship, which is identified with Noah's Ark.
Alpha Columbæ bears the modern titles "Phaet," "Phact," and "Phad." The Chinese called this star "the Old Folks."
Lockyer asserts that twelve different Egyptian temples were oriented to this star, notably those at Edfu and Philæ where Phact was worshipped as far back as 6400 b.c.
Allen considers the star too inconspicuous to warrant such prominence.
Phaet is a 2.5 magnitude star, situated 33° south of ε Orionis, and culminates at 9 p.m., Jan. 26th.
Beta Columbæ is known as "Wezn" or "Wazn," meaning the "weight."
According to Gould, Columba contains seventeen stars.
# Star Lore Of All Ages/The Minor Constellations/Lynx

New York, London: G. P. Putnam's Sons
The Lynx first made its appearance as a constellation in 1690 on the star map of Hevelius. Originally it was said to contain nineteen stars, which number Burritt has increased to forty-four.
The inventor accounted for the title on the ground that ​"it was so inconspicuous a star group that only a lynx-eyed person could discern it."
The Lynx has been known as "the Tiger," and is noted for the number and beauty of its double stars, of which fifty are mentioned in Webb's Celestial Objects. The constellation comes to the meridian in February.
# Star Lore Of All Ages/The Minor Constellations/Coma Berenices

New York, London: G. P. Putnam's Sons
Eratosthenes was the first to mention this faint yet beautiful cluster, and called it "Ariadne's Hair," but ​Tycho Brahe was the first one to catalogue it as a separate constellation in 1602.
Catullus, in his translation of the Greek of Callimachus, thus refers to the location of Coma Berenices:
Allen thinks that the group was known to the Egyptians as "the Many Stars." Other titles for it are "Berenice's Periwig," "Rosa," and "Berenice's Bush," and the figure has been thought to represent the tuft of hair in the Lion's tail, and the sheaf of wheat held by the Virgin.
The Chinese took a great interest in this group, and gave it many fanciful names.
Burritt gives the following brief history of the constellation: "Berenice was of royal descent, and a lady of great beauty, who married Ptolemy Soter or Euergetes, one of the kings of Egypt, her own brother. When he was going on a dangerous expedition against the Assyrians she vowed to dedicate her hair to the goddess of beauty, if he returned Sometime after the victorious return of her in safety. husband the locks, which she had deposited in the temple of Venus, disappeared. The King expressed great regret at the loss, whereupon Conon his astronomer publicly reported that Jupiter had taken away the Queen's locks from the temple and placed them among the stars in this figure."
According to Argelander there are thirty-six stars in this group.
# Star Lore Of All Ages/The Minor Constellations/Lacerta

New York, London: G. P. Putnam's Sons
This asterism was designed by Hevelius, and comprises the stars between Cygnus and Andromeda.
​The original figure drawn by Hevelius is described as "a strange weasel-built creature with a curly tail."
The Chinese knew the stars in this region of the sky as "the Flying Serpent," and in Royer's chart, published in 1679, these stars formed the star group known as "the Sceptre and Hand of Justice."
Argelander mentions thirty-one stars in this constellation, none brighter than 3.9 magnitude.
Lacerta culminates about the middle of April.
# Star Lore Of All Ages/The Minor Constellations/Leo Minor

New York, London: G. P. Putnam's Sons
Hevelius introduced this star group in 1690, forming it from eighteen stars situated between the Greater Lion and Bear. He gave it this title as he said it "partook of the same nature" as the neighbouring figures.
The Chinese included the Greater and Lesser Lion in their great figure of the Dragon.
The zodiacal Crab of the zodiac of Denderah is located in this figure, and this part of the sky was thought to have been sacred to the god Ptah.
Argelander assigned twenty-one stars to this group, none brighter than the fourth magnitude.
# Star Lore Of All Ages/The Minor Constellations/Camelopardalis

New York, London: G. P. Putnam's Sons
The Giraffe, described as "a long, faint, and straggling" constellation, first appeared on the star map of Bartsch in 1640. It is also found in the catalogue of Hevelius published in 1690, as Camelopardalus.
Prof. E. C. Pickering tells us that the correct spelling according to the best classical authorities, both Greek and Latin, is Camelopardalis.
Bartsch wrote that the group represented to him the camel that brought Rebecca to Isaac.
The Chinese are said to have located seven asterisms within the borders of this star group.
​According to Argelander the constellation contains eighty-four stars, none brighter than the fourth magnitude.
# Star Lore Of All Ages/The Minor Constellations/Monoceros

New York, London: G. P. Putnam's Sons
The Unicorn is generally supposed to have been designed by the astronomer Bartsch, but Olbers and Ideler claim that it was invented as early as 1564, and Scaliger is said to have found it on an ancient Persian sphere.
It is situated in the space between Orion, the two Dogs, and the Hydra, The Chinese asterisms, "the Four Great Canals" and "the Outer Kitchen," lay in this region of the sky.
Argelander assigned sixty-six stars to it, and Heis one hundred and twelve.
Monoceros contains many fine star clusters, but no stars brighter than a 3.6 magnitude.
# Star Lore Of All Ages/The Minor Constellations/Argo Navis

New York, London: G. P. Putnam's Sons
Argo can hardly be called a minor constellation, and owes its place under such a heading to the fact that in these latitudes but a very small part of it is visible, so that only a brief reference to it is necessary.
​The Ship, or Argo as it is generally called, lies entirely in the southern hemisphere, east of Canis Major and south of the Unicorn and Hydra. Only the few stars representing the stern of the ship can be seen in the latitude of New York City.
The Ship is figured without a prow, one of the best evidences that chance had no part in the invention of the constellation.
According to mythology Argo was built either by Glaucus, Jason, Argos, or Hercules. It was famous as the first craft that ever ventured to sea, and as the one that bore the Argonautic expedition to Colchis on its quest of the Golden Fleece.
To the Egyptians it represented the ark that bore Osiris and Isis over the Deluge.
Sir Isaac Newton fixed the date of the building of this celebrated craft as 936 b.c.
With the Romans it was generally "Argo," or "Navis," nd the Arabs called it "a Ship." To the Biblical school it represented Noah's Ark.
The lucida of the constellation, never seen in these latitudes, is the first magnitude star Canopus.
# Smith v. Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
39 U.S. 45
Smith v. Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company
ON appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the county of Alexandria, in the District of Columbia.
In the Circuit Court for Alexandria county, the appellant filed a bill to compel the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company, to pay to him a proportion of the amount of a judgment obtained for a prize drawn in a lottery authorized to be drawn by 'The Potomac Company,' the judgment having been assigned to the claimant to the amount for which the bill was filed. The Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company, under the authority of their act of incorporation, and of acts passed by the Legislatures of the states of Virginia and Maryland, had become entitled to, and held all the property, rights, and privileges owned and possessed by the Potomac Company under their charters; and were subjected to the payment of certain debts due by the Potomac Company, according to the provisions of their charter, and the acts of Assembly referred to.
The whole case is fully stated in the opinion of the Court.
The case was argued by Mr. Semmes and Mr. Lee for the appellants; and by Mr. Key and Mr. Jones for the appellees.
Mr. Justice M'LEAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Smith v. California (375 U.S. 259)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
375 U.S. 259
Smith v. California
Edward de Grazia, for Allen and others, as amici curiae.
Thomas M. Thomas, for American Library Association, as amici curiae.
Nathan L. Schoichet, A. L. Wirin and Fred Okrand, for American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, as amici curiae.
Charles H. Keating, Jr., for respondent Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., and others, as amici curiae.
Certiorari to the Appellate Department, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., et al., for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, for further consideration in light of the decision of the Supreme Court of California in Zeitlin v. Arnebergh, 59 Cal.2d 901, 31 Cal.Rptr. 800, 383 P.2d 152.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Smith v. Chapman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
93 U.S. 41
Smith v. Chapman
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.
The case was argued by Mr. W. P. Clough for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. Thomas J. Durant for the defendant in error.
MR. JUSTICE CLIFFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Smith v. California (375 U.S. 259)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
375 U.S. 259
Smith v. California
Stanley Fleishman and Sam Rosenwein, for petitioner.
Roger Arnebergh, Philip E. Grey and Wm. E. Doran, for respondent.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Smith v. Clapp

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
40 U.S. 125
Smith v. Clapp
ERROR to the Circuit Court for the Southern District of Alabama. This suit was instituted in the circuit court, by the defendant in error, against Archibald K. Smith, the plaintiff, and Neil Munn, as the makers of a promissory note, payable to John Barge, or bearer. The note was signed by A. K. Smith and Neil Munn. The writ of capias, by which the action was brought, stated Archibald K. Smith and Neil Munn to be citizens of the state of Alabama; and that Alfred Clapp was a citizen of the state of New York.
The marshal returned, 'executed the writ on A. K. Clapp-Neil Munn not found.' The declaration was filed against A. K. Smith, and stated that Neil Munn was not found. A judgment was rendered against A. K. Smith, by the circuit court, and this writ of error was prosecuted by him.
The case was argued by Key, for the plaintiff; and by Test, for the defendant.
For the plaintiff, it was contended-1. That Barge, the payee (through whom, as assignee, the plaintiff below claimed), not being shown competent to sue in the circuit court, the 11th section of the judiciary act prohibited the plaintiff from suing in that court. 2. The judgment is for more than the amount of the note and interest.
Key contended, that it was necessary to aver that John Barge, to whom the note was given, was not a citizen of Alabama. If this is not done, the circuit court had no jurisdiction of the cause. Cited, 3 Dall. 382; 4 Ibid. 8; 4 Cranch 46; 9 Wheat. 537. The plaintiff must show that he claims through John Barge, a citizen of another state, or he cannot sue. The note is drawn to John Barge, or bearer. The suit is brought as the assignee of Barge.
There is another objection. It should have been averred, that Neil Munn, who was not taken by the marshal, was not a citizen of Alabama. It is not sufficient, that the citizenship is stated in the writ; it should be averred in the declaration, so that it could have been denied in the pleadings. 8 Pet. 148.
It is insisted, that the judgment is for more than the amount of the note and interest; and this is error.
Test, for the defendant in error, said, as to the first error assigned, that the note was payable to Barge, or bearer, and was assigned to Clapp, who appears to be competent to sue in the circuit court; and it was not necessary to show that Barge was competent. See Bullard v. Bell, 1 Mason 251; Bank of Kentucky v. Wister, 2 Pet. 318.
As to the second error. It is a matter of fact, and a mere clerical error, which the defendant ought to have moved the court below to correct. It is not admitted, that the error exists. The interest in Alabama, as allowed by statute, is eight per cent.
This case was brought merely for the purpose of delay; and defendant prays to be allowed the ten per cent. damages.
McKINLEY, Justice, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse