OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States (224 U.S. 474)
* Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States (280 U.S. 52)
See also United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission.
# Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States (224 U.S. 474)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
224 U.S. 474
Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States
Argued: April 16, 1912. --- Decided: April 29, 1912
Mr. P. J. Farrell for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 475-477 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Charles D. Drayton, James Wickersham, and John B. Daish for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Interstate Commerce Commission v. Southern Pacific Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
234 U.S. 315
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Southern Pacific Company
Argued: January 14 and 15, 1914. --- Decided: June 8, 1914
Mr. Blackburn Esterline and Solicitor General Davis for the United states.
Mr. P. J. Farrell for the Interstate Commerce Commission.
Messrs. Gardiner Lathrop, Fred H. Wood, Robert Dunlap, T. J. Norton, C. W. Durbrow, W. F. Herrin, and J. P. Blair for appellees.
Mr. Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Interstate Commerce Commission v. Southern Pacific Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
234 U.S. 315
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Southern Pacific Company
Argued: January 14 and 15, 1914. --- Decided: June 8, 1914
The Pacific Coast Jobbers' Manufacturers' Association complained before the Interstate Commerce Commission of a switching charge of $2.50 per car maintained by the respondents for delivering and receiving carload freight to and from industries located upon spurs and side tracks within the carriers' switching limits in San Francisco. The Commission, finding the facts to be similar to those found in the case of the complaint of the Associated Jobbers of Los Angeles with respect to switching charges in the latter city (18 Inters. Com. Rep. 310), entered a similar order prohibiting the carriers from continuing the charge. This suit was thereupon brought in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Kansas, first division, against the Interstate Commerce Commission, to restrain the enforcement of the order. Upon its transfer to the commerce court, the United States intervened and moved to dismiss the proceeding. This motion was denied, and upon the application of the petitioners an injunction was granted.
The questions presented on the appeal from this order are the same as those which have been considered in the opinion of the court in No. 98, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. decided this day [[[234 U.S. 294]], 58 L. ed. --, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 814], and for the reasons there set forth the order of the Commerce Court is reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California, with instructions to dismiss the bill.
It is so ordered.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Interstate Commerce Commission v. Stickney

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
215 U.S. 98
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Stickney
Argued: October 12, 1909. --- Decided: November 29, 1909
On December 10, 1907, the Interstate Commerce Commission entered an order requiring certain railroads running into Chicago to cease and desist from making a terminal charge of $2 per car for the transportation of live stock beyond the tracks of said railroads in Chicago, and for delivery thereof at the Union Stock Yards, and requiring them to establish and put in force for said services a charge of $1 per car. Compliance with the order was postponed by the Commission until May 15, 1908. On May 7, 1908, the appellees filed this bill in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Minnesota, to restrain the enforcement of said order, averring that the actual cost to them for such terminal services exceeded in each instance the sum of $2 per car, and that the companies were making delivery at a charge less than such actual cost; that therefore the reduction of the charge by the commission to $1 per car was unreasonable, opprssive, and unlawful. A hearing was had before three judges of the eighth circuit, and a restraining order entered as prayed for by the railroad companies, from which order an appeal was taken to this court.
Assistant to the Attorney General Ellis and Mr. S. H. Cowan for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 99-102 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. William D.Mchugh and Walker D. Hines for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 102-104 intentionally omitted]
Statement by Mr. Justice Brewer:
Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hubbard v. New York New England Western Investment Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
119 U.S. 696
Hubbard v. New York New England Western Investment Company
Robt. D. Smith and W. W. Vaughan, for plaintiff in error.
Hugh Porter, for defendant in error.
MATTHEWS, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hubbard v. Soby/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
146 U.S. 56
Hubbard v. Soby
This was a suit brought October 9, 1890, in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Connecticut, to recover an alleged excess of duties upon imports exacted by plaintiff in error in his capacity of collector of customs of the port of Hartford prior to the going into effect of the act of congress of June 10, 1890, entitled 'An act to simplify the laws in relation to the collection of the revenues.' 26 St. p. 131. Judgment was given for defendant in error, February 27, 1892, (49 Fed. Rep. 234,) and on June 11, 1892, the pending writ of error was sued out. The motion to dismiss the writ must be sustained upon the authority of Lau Ow Bew v. U.S., 144 U.S. 47, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 517; McLish v. Roff, 141 U.S. 661, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 118.
Writ of error dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hubbell v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Hubbell v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Hubbell v. United States (171 U.S. 203)
* Hubbell v. United States (179 U.S. 77)
* Hubbell v. United States (179 U.S. 86 )
See also United States v. Hubbell.
# Hubbard v. Soby

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
146 U.S. 56
Hubbard v. Soby
Edwin B. Smith and Lewis E. Stanton, for the motion.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, opposed.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 57-59 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hubbard v. Tod

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
171 U.S. 474
Hubbard v. Tod

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Bartels

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
308 U.S. 180
John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Bartels
Argued: Nov. 9, 1939. --- Decided: Dec 4, 1939
Messrs. L. M. Bickett, of San Antonio, Tex., and John H. Bickett, Jr., of Dallas, Tex., for petitioner.
Messrs. T. E. Mosheim, of Seguin, Tex., Elmer McClain, of Lima, Ohio, and Wm. Lemke, of Fargo, N.D., for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Yates

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
299 U.S. 178
John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Yates
Argued: Nov. 18, 1936. --- Decided: Dec 7, 1936
Messrs. Alex W. Smith, Jr., of Atlanta, Ga., and Byron K. Elliott, of Boston, Mass., for petitioner.
Mr. Edgar Watkins, of Atlanta, Ga., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ivan Eberhart v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Eberhart v. United States 546 U.S. 12, was a per curiam opinion that reversed a ruling by the Court of Appeals, and ruled that Fed. R. Civ. P. 33 established a non-jurisdictional, inflexible claim-processing rule that was forfeited if not timely asserted.

## Linked case(s)

434 F.3d 935
# Ivan the Czar

* Ivan the Czar, in The Literary Souvenir, 1827 (1826).
* Ivan the Czar, in Records of Woman: with Other Poems (Miscellaneous Poems), 1828.
# Ivan the Fool (Collection)

IVAN THE FOOL
or
The Old Devil and the Three Small Devils
also
A LOST OPPORTUNITY
and
POLIKUSHKA
by COUNT LEO TOLSTOI
Translated from the Russian by Count Norraikow
ILLUSTRATED BY VALERIAN GRIBAYÉDOFF
NEW YORK
CHARLES L. WEBSTER AND COMPANY
1891
Copyright, 1891, By CHAS. L. WEBSTER & CO.
[All Rights Reserved.]
CONTENTS.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society/Volume 55

This volume contains the Hikayat Sĕri Rama.
​[No. 55]
JOURNAL
of the
Straits Branch
of the
Royal Asiatic Society
JUNE, 1910
SINGAPORE:
Printed at the Methodist Publishing House
1910.
page
# Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society/Volume 53

​[No. 53]
JOURNAL
of the
Straits Branch
of the
Royal Asiatic Society
SEPTEMBER, 1909
SINGAPORE:
Printed at the Methodist Publishing House
1909.
page
# Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society/Volume 56

​[No. 56]
JOURNAL
of the
Straits Branch
of the
Royal Asiatic Society
DECEMBER, 1910
SINGAPORE:
Printed at the Methodist Publishing House
1910.
page
REMBAU,
ONE OF THE NINE STATES.
Its History,
Constitution,
and Customs.
—by—
C. W. C. Parr and W. H. Mackray,
of the
Federated Malay States Civil Service.
Journal No. 56,
Straits Branch, Royal Asiatic Society,
1910.
page
page
​Page:Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society (IA journalof555719101911roya).pdf/119 ​Page:Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society (IA journalof555719101911roya).pdf/120
# Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society/Volume 58

This volume comprises a single article on the Hikayat Saif-al-Yezan by G. F. Hose.
​[No. 58]
JOURNAL
of the
Straits Branch
of the
Royal Asiatic Society
SEPTEMBER, 1911
SINGAPORE:
Printed at the Methodist Publishing House
1911.
page
# Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society/Volume 59

​[No. 59]
JOURNAL
of the
Straits Branch
of the
Royal Asiatic Society
July, 1911
SINGAPORE:
Printed at the Methodist Publishing House
1911.
page
# Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society/Volume 57

​[No. 57]
JOURNAL
of the
Straits Branch
of the
Royal Asiatic Society
JANUARY, 1911
SINGAPORE:
Printed at the Methodist Publishing House
1911.
page
# Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society/Volume 54

​[No. 54]
JOURNAL
of the
Straits Branch
of the
Royal Asiatic Society
JANUARY, 1910
SINGAPORE:
Printed at the Methodist Publishing House
1910.
page
# Humphrey v. Moore

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
375 U.S. 335
Humphrey v. Moore
Argued: Oct. 16, 1963. --- Decided: Jan 6, 1964
See 376 U.S. 935, 84 S.Ct. 697.
David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., and Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C., for petitioners.
John Y. Brown, Louisville, Ky., and Newell N. Fowler, Memphis, Tenn., for respondents.
Mr. Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Humphrey v. Smith

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Murphy
United States Supreme Court
336 U.S. 695
Humphrey v. Smith
Argued: March 30, 1949. --- Decided: April 25, 1949
Mr. Robert W. Ginnane, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Daniel F. Mathews, of Syracuse, N.Y., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Japanese flower arrangement/Chapter 16

CHAPTER SIXTEEN
FLOWERS BLOOMING IN AND OUT OF SEASON
IN Japan flowers which bloom in their proper season are the most highly esteemed and are considered the most suitable for gifts. When flowers blooming in season are arranged with flowers which have been forced into bloom in advance of or kept after their usual time of blossom, the seasonable flowers will always take the highest positions. Heaven and Man will be made of the seasonable flowers, and only Earth may be of those blooming out of their time.
Flowers blooming out of season would never be chosen for a present by a Japanese nor used as decorations for an entertainment. In fact a Japanese never attaches any value to flowers or fruit forced out of their proper season; strawberries in January ​have no charms for him. In presenting flowers to a friend they always send them in buds, so that the friend may experience the pleasure of seeing the flowers open in his own home; and a branch of a non-flowering tree would be given while its leaves were forming, so that the pleasure of watching the leaves unfold would not be lost.
Arrangement of Plum Blossoms. The upper section of the vase is filled with water only, and is supposed to represent the reflection of the moon
Three-sectioned Vase with Wistaria and Iris
# Japanese flower arrangement/Chapter 17

CHAPTER SEVENTEEN
HOW TO ARRANGE FLOWERS IN A VASE OF MANY SECTIONS
TREES are all yo, or masculine, so when they are arranged with anything else they must be above, while grasses and flowers, being feminine, can be put down in the lower parts of the arrangement. But when your vase is a hanging one, a many-sectioned vase or a double bucket, you may arrange grasses high and trees low.
This is because such an arrangement is often supposed to look like a mountain, which has grass growing on its top and trees at its foot and in the valleys.
A poem comes to mind here which is very dear to all lovers of Ike-bana:
       Musashi no ni
          Kusa makura shite
       Nagamure ba, Fuji yori takaki
          Tokonatsu no hanna.
​"Upon Musashino prairie I lie with a pillow of grass, and I see a little wild pink, but—it looks higher than Fuji."
In arranging flowers in a three-sectioned vase the idea is this: the flowers placed in the highest section should be plants which would grow on a mountain top; in the next section upland-growing plants, and in the lowest place, valley or water-growing plants, for the last section represents also sea or lake level. Thus plants of all altitudes can be brought together in one vase. This order may be changed, but the three-sectioned vase was originated to carry out this idea. Trees are sometimes placed in the highest division, as trees do grow on mountain tops.
Three Aspidistra Leaves
Five Aspidistra Leaves
Seven Aspidistra Leaves
Nine Aspidistra Leaves
Showing how Leaves must be tied in Groups over Night Seven Aspidistra Leaves. Showing how desirable a torn leaf is considered
# Japanese flower arrangement/Chapter 18

CHAPTER EIGHTEEN
WHEN FLOWERS ALONE MAY BE USED AND WHEN LEAVES ONLY
THE best form in flower arrangement is to have both flowers and leaves; but there are flowers which may be arranged alone. These are the flowers on which the leaves come first and go before the flower blooms. In Japan these are principally natsu suisen, or summer narcissus, and a red wild flower called shiba. Such flowers may be arranged without leaves.
In the case of the trees and shrubs which come into blossom before they leaf, as our cherry, the prominent parts of the arrangement, Heaven and Man, should be blossoms, and the leaves put in only for Earth. If it is an arrangement where attributes are used, make them of the leaves and have the ​three main principles of Heaven, Man, and Earth of the blossoms.
When a plant or tree leafs out before blossoming, then the leaves must predominate in an arrangement which should have only a few blossoms, and these placed in the unimportant places.
For arrangements of leaves only, baran—or aspidistra as we call it—is much used. It can be had at all seasons and makes one of the most perfect arrangements, as the lines can be made so distinct with its long, slender leaves. They are also easily bent with the hand.
You will see that in nearly all arrangements of aspidistra one leaf is curled up. This is supposed to contain an insect. One leaf that is wormeaten or torn is considered desirable and thought to make the arrangement more natural, as there is seldom in nature a plant without one imperfect leaf.
Working with aspidistra is excellent practise for a beginner. Its leaves, being easily ​bent, do not require such patience to bring into the correct curves, and the stems are readily brought together at the base. In its arrangement also, faults are quickly recognized and easily corrected. Therefore I give many different examples of arrangements of aspidistra.
The curled leaf is made by putting the extreme point of the leaf around a small stem and rolling it up in the palms of your hands for a few minutes. Then let go of it; this will make a loose roll. Should you wish it very tight and small, roll as tight as possible, then pull the stick out and put a pin or two through to hold the curl in place. The pins may be ​left in over night and will in no way injure the leaf.
Aspidistra is one of the few plants arranged not entirely according to its natural growth, but the nature of its growth is improved upon—art here aiding nature.
# Japanese flower arrangement/Chapter 20

CHAPTER TWENTY
JAPANESE FLOWER VASES
ALTHOUGH the Japanese have not as large a flora as other countries, they have above all others a greater beauty and variety of flower receptacles. These are not only beautiful in form, material, and design, but are made for the use to which they are put; so that a flower can always be placed in an appropriate receptacle, and probably in one especially designed for that particular sort of flower.
Flower Basket of Split Bamboo
Many are the odd and fanciful significances connected with these Japanese receptacles. For instance, the hanging vases so numerous and quaint in form came into use through the idea that flowers presented by an esteemed friend should not be placed where they could be looked down upon, so they were raised and hung. And in the hanging bamboo vases the large, round surface on top is supposed to represent the moon, and the hole for the nail a star. The cut, or opening, below the top is called fukumuki the "wind drawing through place."
The low, flat vases, more used in summer than winter, not only give variety in the form of receptacles, but, as with vines and hanging vases, make it possible to arrange plants of bulbous and water growth in ​natural positions. The standard vases are the most common, for in them all arrangements of flowers, except aquatics and creepers, are placed. They alone outnumber in beauty and variety all forms of our flower vases combined.
Again, when we come to consider the color of the Japanese vases, we can only admire their never failing taste in the choice of the soft pastel shades. Could anything more clearly show their perfect taste than their preference for bronze? This to them seems most like mother earth in color, and therefore best, as it is, to enhance the beauty of flowers instead of detracting from their exquisite shades. What a contrast to the glitter and show of our silver vases, which represent generally little else but their cost.
The bamboo, in its simplicity of line and neutral color, makes a vase always charming but, alas! not practical in this country, where our steam heat at once causes it to split. But while vases made from solid pieces of bamboo cannot be used in this ​country, the beautiful baskets made in such variety of shape from bamboo reeds, with their color assuming the soft brown shades of mother earth, so perfect an offset for all the varied tints of the flowers, are entirely practical in any climate.
Not to be overlooked is the tiny hanging vase found in the simple peasant home—some curious root picked up at no cost and fashioned into a shape suitable to hold a single flower or vine. Such vases could be made with little effort by anyone and find place anywhere in our own land, had we only a keen enough desire to be always surrounded by the beautiful.
After experience with Japanese vases we find ourselves much more critical in the selection of American or European ones and, beholding all the delightful forms of Japanese vases depicted in their prints, we grow most regretful of the scarcity of their importation into Europe or this country.