OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# South Australian Advertiser/Obituary/John Davis

* related portals: Obituaries.
* related authors: John Davis (1829-1885).
Source: The South Australian Advertiser (Adelaide, SA), Thursday 18 June 1885, p.6 — Death of an explorer.
DEATH OF AN EXPLORER.
It is with regret that we announce the death of Mr. John Davis, of the Civil Service, which occurred at his residence, Payneham, on Tuesday afternoon. The deceased, who was well-known in the colony, came from India to South Australia and accompanied McKinlay in his expedition across the continent. The details of that expedition have been handed down to posterity by the late Mr. Davis, who wrote an exceedingly interesting account, which was published in book-form, the book also containing a number of plates which faithfully portrayed the character of the country passed through. In McKinlay's party the deceased gentleman had charge of the camels, his previous experience with the "ships of the desert" in India admirably fitting him for the post. It was in 1861 that McKinlay, whose renown as an explorer and a bushman had become known to the Government, was appointed to the position of leader of an expedition to search for the Burke and Wills party. Mr. Davis volunteered for the expedition, and on his return published the work referred to above under the title of "Tracks of McKinlay Across Australia." The chief object of the expedition was the discovery and relief of Burke's party, to acquire a knowledge of the country between Eyre's Creek and Central Mount Stuart, and lastly to visit the western shores of Lake Eyre. The party set out on August 16, 1861, with a team of bullocks, seventy sheep, two packhorses, and four camels. Arriving at Cooper's Creek McKinlay was conducted by the natives to the grave of Gray, one of Burke's party, and shortly afterwards he learned the fate of Burke and Wills, whose remains were found at Cooper's Creek. The party then proceeded to explore towards Central Mount Stuart, and crossed the Stony Desert, described as a "succession of bronzed undulations." After suffering great hardships the party reached Melbourne on September 25, 1862, or a little over thirteen months after leaving Adelaide. In April, 1864, Colonel Finniss was appointed Government Resident at the Northern Territory, and was dispatched thither with an expedition to form a new settlement. In this expedition, which is commonly known as the "Escape Cliffs expedition," Mr. Davis joined, and was given the position of assistant storekeeper. Some time after Mr. Goyder's survey of the Northern Territory Mr. Davis, who in the meantime had returned to Adelaide, went to the Territory as agent for several land-order holders and selected a deal of pastoral country. This occupied some time, and on Mr. Davis returning to Adelaide and remaining some time he procured a position in the water works department, which he retained up to the time of his death, a period of about thirteen years. Mr. Davis was a painstaking careful officer, and his comparatively early death at the age of fifty-six is greatly regretted. The deceased leaves, a widow and three daughters.
# South Australian Advertiser/1878/Death of William Mower Akhurst

Source: South Australian Advertiser, Thursday 22 August 1878, p5, col. B
Layout 2
DEATH OF WILLIAM MOWER AKHURST.
TO THE EDITOR.
Sir—The death of this gentleman once well known in the literary circle of Adelaide and Melbourne deserves a passing notice. Mr. Akhurst was a pioneer of this colony,
and in the older times was reporter and sub- editor of the Adelaide Times when James Allen, better known as "Dismal Jemmy" on account of his doleful aspect and lugubrious articles, was the proprietor of that journal, and whose dullness was only relieved by Akhurst's racy leaders. Mr. Akhurst was subsequently editor of the Free Press, which, existed only about six months. Shortly after the decease of that journal Mr. Akhurst repaired with his family to Melbourne during the feverish height of the gold digging times, where his gifted powers soon ob- tained him employment on the staff of the Argus, where as journalist and burlesque writer for the stage he remained a popular man for some years. Latterly in England his witty and ludicrous pantomimes delighted crowded audiences at several of the leading theatres in London. He was again on his return to these colonies, but died on board the Patriarch, sailing vessel, on June 6th last, during her voyage from Lon- don to Sydney, some where about the age of 53 or 56. Old colonists will well remember his genial social qualities, amiable disposition, and kindly nature, that never made an enemy; his infinite jest and ready humor, that used to "set the table in a roar:" and they will give a sigh to the memory of "Poor Akhurst," to whom glad life seemed so sweet and joyous a boon.— I am, &c., J. BOND PHIPSON. August 19th, 1878.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# South Boston Iron Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
118 U.S. 37
South Boston Iron Company v. United States
Argued: April 19, 1886. ---
[Statement of Case from pages 38-42 intentionally omitted]
John C. Fay, for appellant, South Boston Iron Co.
Sol. Gen. Goode, for the United States.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# South Australia

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "South Australia."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* South Australia (1843), by Matthew Smith
* South Australia: Exploring Expedition Into the Interior of the Continent (1860), by John McDouall Stuart
* South Australia, in 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica
# Social Security Act 2018 (Version 56)/Section 20

20Jobseeker support: requirements
A person is entitled to jobseeker support if the person—
(a)has a work gap; and
(b)is available for work; and
(c)meets the age requirement; and
(d)meets the residential requirement; and
(e)has no or minimum income.
Compare: 1964 No 136 s 88B(1), (2), (3), (4)
# Social Security Act 2018 (Version 56)/Section 22

22When person is available for work
A person (P) is available for work if P—
(a)is available for and seeking full-time employment and—
(i)is willing and able to undertake it; and
(ii)has taken reasonable steps to find it; or
(b)would satisfy paragraph (a) were it not for circumstances that would qualify P for an exemption under the regulations referred to in section 157 from some or all of the work-test obligations; or
(c)is willing and able to undertake full-time employment but, because of a health condition, injury, or disability, is limited in P’s capacity to seek, undertake, or be available for it.
Compare: 1964 No 136 s 88B(1)
# Social Security Act 2018 (Version 56)/Section 23

23Jobseeker support: age requirement
An applicant for jobseeker support meets the age requirement if the applicant is—
(a)at least 18 years old, in the case of an applicant without a dependent child:
(b)at least 20 years old, in any other case.
Compare: 1964 No 136 s 88B(2)
# Social Security Act 2018 (Version 56)/Section 19

19General limitation on receiving benefit: persons unlawfully resident or present in New Zealand and persons holding temporary entry class visa
(1)A person is not entitled or eligible to receive a benefit if the person is—
(a)unlawfully resident or present in New Zealand; or
(b)lawfully resident or present in New Zealand but only by virtue of holding a temporary entry class visa.
(2)This section is subject to section 205.
Compare: 1964 No 136 s 74A(1)
# Social Security Act 2018 (Version 56)/Section 26

26Jobseeker support: ineligibility
A person (P) is not entitled to, or eligible to be granted, jobseeker support if—
(a)P is a full-time student (unless P is eligible under section 25); or
(b)P is unemployed because of P’s participation, or participation by fellow members of the same union at the same place of employment, in a strike; or
(c)MSD reasonably believes that P became unemployed or took leave with or without pay from P’s employment for the purpose of undertaking employment-related training.
Compare: 1964 No 136 s 88D
# Social Security Act 2018 (Version 56)/Section 18

18General limitation on receiving more than 1 benefit
A person is not entitled to receive at the same time, in his or her own right,—
(a)more than 1 main benefit under this Act; or
(b)a main benefit under this Act and New Zealand superannuation; or
(c)a main benefit under this Act and a veteran’s pension.
Compare: 1964 No 136 s 72(a)
# Social Security Act 2018 (Version 56)/Section 2

2Commencement
(1)This Act comes into force on 26 November 2018.
(2)However, the following specified provisions come into force on the day after the date on which this act receives the Royal assent:
(a)section 7 (directions):
(b)sections 99 to 102 (notices):
(c)section 372 (directions):
(d)section 380 (directions):
(e)sections 418 to 454 (regulations, directions, notices, and orders):
(f)clause 54 of Schedule 1 (orders):
(g)clause 68 of Schedule 1 (regulations):
(h)clauses 15 and 17 of Schedule 3 (rules):
(i)clauses 10(3) and 18 of Schedule 6 (regulations and orders):
(3)A power that is conferred by those specified provisions, and that is exercised on or after the day after the date on which this Act receives the Royal assent and before 26 November 2018, may be exercised only with effect on or after 26 November 2018.
(4)If subsections (2) and (3) are to be, or have been, relied on to exercise a power,–
(a)all other enactments relevant to the power’s exercise, and that have not yet commenced, must be treated as if they had commenced; and
(b)a legal position that would be conferred or imposed by an enactment relevant to the power’s exercise, and that has not yet commenced, must be treated as if it has accrued or been imposed.
(5)This section does not affect the application of the Interpretation Act 1999 to this Act.
(6)However, the following specified provisions (which relate to 2016 youth services amendments) come into force on a date that is, or is after, 26 November 2018, and is appointed by the Governor-General by Order in Council:
(a)sections 109(2)(h) and (j), 165, 168, 275, and 276:
(b)the cross-heading above section 165:
(c)paragraph (c) of the definition of young person obligation in section 268:
(d)section 431(1)(e)(v):
(e)clauses 69 to 76 of Schedule 1.
(7)One or more orders may be made under subsection (6) bringing different provisions into force on different dates.
Compare: 1999 No 85 s 11
# Social Security Act 2018 (Version 56)/Section 24

24Jobseeker support: no or minimum income
(1)In this subpart, a person (P) has no or minimum income if P has—
(a)no income; or
(b)income of less than the amount that would reduce the applicable rate of jobseeker support to zero.
(2)If, during a temporary period, P has enough income to reduce the applicable rate of jobseeker support to zero, but P otherwise meets the requirements for jobseeker support, P’s entitlement to jobseeker support is not affected by that income.
Compare: 1964 No 136 s 88B(4), (5)
# Social Security Act 2018 (Version 56)/Section 21

21What is work gap
(1)A person (P) has a work gap if—
(a)P is not in full-time employment; or
(b)P is in employment but is losing earnings through a health condition or injury (for example, is not working at all or is working reduced hours).
(2)For the purposes of subsection (1)(b), P may treat as a loss of P’s earnings a payment made to any other person who acts as P’s substitute during the period of P’s health condition or injury.
(3)Despite subsection (1)(a), P still has a work gap if—
(a)P is receiving jobseeker support at the rate in clause 1(c), (e), or (f) of Part 1 of Schedule 4; and
(c)the income from that employment and P’s other income (if any) when calculated over a 52 week period is less than the amount that would, under the appropriate income test, reduce the applicable rate of jobseeker support to zero.
Compare: 1964 No 136 s 88B(1), (6), (7)
# Social Security Act 2018 (Version 56)/Section 25

25Jobseeker support: discretionary grant on ground of hardship
(1)MSD may grant jobseeker support to a person (P) who is eligible under subsection (2), (3), or (4) if P—
(a)is in hardship; and
(b)is not entitled or eligible to receive any other main benefit under this Act or New Zealand superannuation or a veteran’s pension; and
(c)is unable to earn enough income to support P and P’s spouse or partner (if any) and dependent children (if any).
(2)P is eligible under this subsection if P meets the requirements in section 20(a), (b), and (c).
(3)P is eligible under this subsection, during the period between the end of one academic year and the start of the next, if P is a full-time student and meets the requirements in section 20(c) and (d).
(4)P is eligible under this subsection, during the period between the end of one academic year and the start of the next, if P is a full-time student who is aged 16 or 17 years and MSD is satisfied that—
(a)P has a parental support gap (as defined in section 52(1)(a), (b), or (c), but not as defined in section 52(1)(d)); or
(b)P is in a relationship.
Compare: 1964 No 136 s 88C
# States of Christian Life and Vocation, According to the Doctors and Theologians of the Church/Part 1/Section 1

We shall include in this state every one who is not in the perfect state, specially so called; that is, all who are not in the religious state, or have not been raised to the episcopate. Indeed the common state of life contains many classes of human beings who, although in conditions otherwise differing, are in the same state with respect to the Christian life. Above all, we must declare that it does not enter into our purpose to judge of or compare the interior state of the souls that are in divers positions, "for man seeth the things that appear, but the Lord beholds the heart." (i Kings xvi, 7.) Suarez, following St. Thomas, says: "There is nothing to hinder a man from being perfect, even though he has not embraced a state of perfection. It may also happen that one who is in a state of perfection is not perfect. These two propositions are beyond doubt, and supported by experience. All religious are in a perfect state, and still not all are perfect; some of them may not be even in a state of grace. On the other hand, many seculars and married people may be perfect, though, for all that, not in a state of perfection. The reason or proof of the first proposition is, that we can contract an obligation and not comply with it; have an employment and neglect it.... Even when in a perfect state, man always remains free to acquire, or not to acquire, perfection."
"The proof of the second proposition is, that, though the state of perfection facilitates the acquirement of perfection, nevertheless it is not a necessary means to acquire it. To reach perfection, the soul need not keep all the counsels: it is enough to keep some of them; and we can, even when not in a state of perfection, perform works of counsel, and thus spontaneously arrive at perfection."
It were, then, imprudent and rash to measure the interior perfection of souls by the state in which they live. Following the great theologians and doctors, we can study and compare the exterior states of life that are in the Church, and whose variety is one of the many beauties of the Spouse of Christ. But, in this study and comparison, we must be careful not to swerve from the doctrine of those who are our guides and our masters. To act otherwise would be to expose ourselves to go astray and fall into error. Do we not hear too often, alas! Christians, who, without knowing it, talk of the various states of Christian life, just as do heretics upon whom the Church has set her anathema?

## Footnotes

* ↑ We shall speak on vocation to the priesthood when we come to treat of the state of perfection in exercise.
* ↑ Suarez, De statu perfectionis, c. v, n. I. S. Th., ii, 2, q. 184, a. 4.
* ↑ 4 Ibid., c. v t n. 2.
# Staten Island Rapid Transit Company v. Transit Commission Of The State Of New York Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
276 U.S. 632
The STATEN ISLAND RAPID TRANSIT COMPANY, plaintiff in error, v. The TRANSIT COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, The STATEN ISLAND RAPID TRANSIT RAILWAY COMPANY and The Staten Island Railway Company, plaintiffs in error,
The writs of error are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction in that the writs herein are not directed to a court, but to an administrative commission. Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS, Mr. Justice SANFORD, and Mr. Justice STONE entertain a different view.
The motions to amend the writs of error, or for other appropriate relief in the premises, or that the writs of error be treated as petitions for certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the State of New York, are denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Company v. Phoenix Indemnity Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
281 U.S. 98
Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Company v. Phoenix Indemnity Company
Argued: March 7, 1930. --- Decided: March 17, 1930
[Syllabus from pages 98-100 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Frederick H. Wood, of New York City, for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 100-102 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# States of Christian Life and Vocation, According to the Doctors and Theologians of the Church/Part 1/Section 1/Article 1
## Article 1: Marriage

Let us open this subject with the grave and remarkable words of the catechism of the Council of Trent, whose high authority no one will call into question: "Since the pastors of souls ought always to have in view the happy and perfect life of Christians, they should wish, above all, what the apostle wished for himself. Writing to the Corinthians, he says to them : I wish that all men were like myself: namely: that all should practise continence, or perfect chastity. Indeed, the most blessed thing for a Christian in this life is, to have his mind free from all the distractions and solicitudes of the world, to reign over his passions, subdued, and almost extinct, through virtue, and to repose blissfully in the practice of piety arid in holy thoughts of heaven.
"But, as marriage has been enriched by God with a multitude of gifts, ... it is clear that the faithful should be instructed in what relates to that state." This is what we are about to do. Marriage is the conjugal, legitimate, and indissoluble union of man and woman, raised by our Lord to the dignity of a sacrament.
"Jesus Christ himself merited for us, by his passion, the grace which sanctifies spouses, perfects their mutual love, and strengthens the indissolubility of their union." "If any one says that marriage is not, truly and properly, one of the seven sacraments of the New Law, and that it does not confer grace, let him be anathema." Thus the Church speaks through the holy Council of Trent.
On the subject of marriage, we shall answer only the following questions, which appear to us best to suit our purpose : 1. Is marriage a holy state? 2. Is it obligatory? 3. Is it counselled ? 4. What ends should be had in view by those who enter it? 5. What are the chief cases in which marriage is unlawful or invalid ?

## Footnotes

* ↑ Catechismus adparockos, de matrimonio, n. I.
* ↑ Council of Trent, sess. 24.
* ↑ Ibid., sess. 24, can. I.
# Springfield Gas Electric Company v. City of Springfield

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
257 U.S. 66
Springfield Gas Electric Company v. City of Springfield
Argued: Oct. 19, 1921. --- Decided: Nov 7, 1921
Messrs. Philip Barton Warren, of Springfield, Ill., Joseph S.C.lark, of Philadelphia, Pa., and William L. Patton, of Springfield, Ill., for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 67-68 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Bayard Lacey Catron and A. D. Stevens, both of Springfield, Ill., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Springstead v. Crawfordsville State Bank

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
231 U.S. 541
Springstead v. Crawfordsville State Bank
Argued: December 4, 1913. --- Decided: December 22, 1913
Mr. J. C. Davant for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Peter O. Knight and C. Fred Thompson for defendant in error.
Memorandum opinion by Mr. Chief Justice White, by direction of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Springfield v. Quick

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
63 U.S. 56
Springfield v. Quick

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse