OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Hudson Mr Company v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
313 U.S. 98
Hudson Mr Company v. United States
Argued: April 7, 8, 1941. --- Decided: April 28, 1941
On July 31, 1937, appellant filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission a passenger tariff establishing a fare of 10 cents for interstate transportation on its downtown line in lieu of the existing fare of 6 cents. The Commission suspended the tariff and after full hearing found that the revenue results to appellant would be more favorable under an 8-cent fare than under a 10-cent fare and further determined that the proposed 10-cent fare would be unreasonable under Sections 1 and 15a of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-15a and that an 8-cent fare had been justified.
The Commission directed the cancellation of the schedule filed, without prejudice to the establishment of an 8-cent fare, and accordingly, in July, 1938, appellant canceled its proposed tariff and put into effect a fare of 8 cents. The Commission refused a rehearing.
In June, 1939, appellant brought this suit to set aside the Com ission's order. The case was heard in the District Court by three judges upon the record made before the Commission, and the court rendered its decision in June, 1940, 33 F.Supp. 495, holding that the findings of the Commission were based upon substantial evidence and that the order was within the Commission's authority, was not confiscatory, and did not deprive appellant of its property without due process of law.
As this Court has observed, 'The raising of rates does not necessarily increase revenue. It may in particular localities reduce revenue instead of increasing it, by discouraging patronage'. Florida v. United States, 282 U.S. 194, 214, 51 S.Ct. 119, 124, 125, 75 L.Ed. 291. The effect of an increased rate of 10 cents as compared with one of 8 cents, with respect to resulting revenues, was necessarily one of judgment upon evidence and the Commission had evidence before it with respect to traffic conditions in the area in question and the extent of probable diversion of traffic if the fare were increased to 10 cents. We conclude that in this relation there was evidence to support the Commission's findings and its findings supported its order.
The decree of the District Court is affirmed. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co., 227 U.S. 88, 98, 33 S.Ct. 185, 57 L.Ed. 431; Virginian Railway Co. v. United States, 272 U.S. 658, 665, 666, 47 S.Ct. 222, 225, 71 L.Ed. 463; Florida v. United States, 292 U.S. 1, 9, 54 S.Ct. 603, 606, 78 L.Ed. 1077; Ohio v. United States, 292 U.S. 498, 506, 54 S.Ct. 792, 795, 78 L.Ed. 1388; United States v. American Tin Plate Co., 301 U.S. 402, 411, 57 S.Ct. 804, 808, 81 L.Ed. 1186.
Affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hudson County News Company v. Sills/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
378 U.S. 583
Hudson County News Company v. Sills
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hudson Distributors, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
377 U.S. 386
Hudson Distributors, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Company
Argued: April 29, 30, 1964. --- Decided: June 1, 1964
Myron N. Krotinger, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.
Ralph M. Carson, New York City, for appellee Upjohn Co.
Everett I. Willis, New York City, for appellee Eli Lilly & Co.
Mr. Justice GOLDBERG delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hudson Mr Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
313 U.S. 98
Hudson Mr Company v. United States
Argued: April 7, 8, 1941. --- Decided: April 28, 1941
Mr. John F. Finerty, of New York City, for appellant.
Mr. Edward M. Reidy, of Washington, D.C., for appellees United States and Interstate Commerce Commission.
Mr. Charles Hershenstein, of Jersey City, N.J., for appellee, City of Jersey City.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hudson County News Company v. Sills

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
378 U.S. 583
Hudson County News Company v. Sills
Julius Kass, for appellant.
Arthur J. Sills, Atty. Gen. of New Jersey, Evan William Jahos, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John W. Hayden, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellees.
Morris B. Abram, for Council for Periodical Distributors Associations, Inc., as amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gully v. First National Bank in Meridian

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
299 U.S. 109
Gully v. First National Bank in Meridian
Argued: Oct. 19, 1936. --- Decided: Nov 9, 1936
[Syllabus from pages 109-111 intentionally omitted]
Mr. J. C. Floyd, of Meridian, Miss., for petitioner.
Messrs. R. E. Wilbourn and Albert S. Bozeman, both of Meridian, Miss., for respondent.
Mr. Justice CARDOZO delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gumbasia

* related portals: Cartoons.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Cast and Crew :
| Crew ||
| Director | Art Clokey (d. 2010) |
| Screenwriter | Art Clokey |
| Cinematographer | Art Clokey |
| Editor | Art Clokey |
| Based on available information, the latest crew member that is relevant to international copyright laws died in 2010, meaning that this film may be in the public domain in countries and jurisdictions with 13 years p.m.a. or less, as well as in the United States. ||
GUMBASIA
BY ART CLOKEY
THE END
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works published in 1955 could have had their copyright renewed in 1982 or 1983, i.e. between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st, 1984.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gumaer v. Colorado Oil Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
152 U.S. 88
Gumaer v. Colorado Oil Company
Statement by Mr. Justice SHIRAS.
The Colorado Oil Company, describing itself as a corporation organized and existing under the laws of New York, brought its bill in equity in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Colorado, on June 15, 1887, against Augustus R. Gumaer, a citizen of Colorado, and the Florence Oil Company, of that state, praying for an injunction to restrain the defendant Gumaer from assigning or incumbering a certain leasehold estate, with certain rights and privileges thereto annexed, and to restrain the defendants, and each of them, from consuming any oil, gas, metal, or mineral from the leasehold premises, or disturbing the complainant's possession thereof, or destroying its property thereon. The court entered an order on the following day restraining the defendants from doing any of the acts which the complainant sought to have enjoined until the 27th of the same month,-the day set for a hearing of the cause. On that day it was ordered, in accordance with the stipulation of counsel, that the restraining order should remain in force until the final hearing, and that the defendants should answer to the merits on or before September 15, 1887. On the 12th of that month the defendant Gumaer filed his answer, and on the 3d of the following month the company filed a formal replication thereto.
A judgment pro confesso against the Florence Oil Company was entered on February 6, 1888. The cause, as against Gumaer, was heard in the said court upon bill, answer, and evidence, and on December 22, 1888, the court entered a final decree embodying the relief by injunction prayed for in the bill, and ordering that a lease from Stephen J. Tanner to Gumaer, dated October 6, 1886, be surrendered and delivered, for the use of the complainant, into the office of the clerk of the court, and that two other leases, dated, respectively, October 12, 1886, and December 20, 1886, by which it appeared that Gumaer had granted and demised certain parts of the property to the company, be canceled and annulled, and all parties thereto be relieved from the conditions thereof. The defendants appealed from that decree to this court.
T. M. Patterson, for appellants.
E. T. Wells and R. T. McNeal, for respondent.
Mr. Justice SHIRAS, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gully v. Interstate Natural Gas Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
292 U.S. 16
Gully v. Interstate Natural Gas Company
Argued: March 15, 1934. --- Decided: April 2, 1934
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Mississippi.
Messrs. Edward W. Smith, of Clarksdale, Miss., and W. E. Gore and J. A. Lauderdale, both of Jackson, Miss., for appellants.
Messrs. David Clay Bramlette, of Woodville, Miss., and Garner W. Green, of Jackson, Miss., for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Indian Medicinal Plants/Natural Order Droseraceæ

​ The juice is used externally in bruises and burns, also to cure superficial ulcers. As a styptic it is used on fresh cuts and abrasions (Thornton in Watt's Dictionary).
Malic acid from Crassulaceœ.— The acid was prepared chiefly from Echeveria secunda glauca and Sedum purpurescens (Bryophyllum calycinum yields more, namely, about 0.23 per cent, of the leaves, but is less easily obtainable) by extraction with boiling water, precipitation of the lead salt and decomposition of this with hydrogen sulphide. The residue left on evaporation of the aqueous solution, when dried at 110° until constant in weight, has the composition C$_8$H$_8$G$_8$; it represents an anhydride of the acid, for the salts prepared from it are derived from a dibasic acid, C$_4$H$_6$O$_5$ . The calcium hydrogen salt is usually amorphous, but was once obtained in regular octahedra with 6 H$_2$O; the corresponding salt of ordinary malic acid crystallises in rhombic octahedra. The barium salt is anhydrous, whereas ordinary barium malate crystallises with 1 H$_2$ O. The silver salt is anhydrous, whereas ordinary silver malate contains 5 H$_2$O. The lead salt crystallises with 3 H$_2$O. No ammonium hydrogen salt could be prepared, whereas ordinary malic acid forms a well crystallised salt of this composition. The dimethylic salt was prepared from the anhydride and methylic alcohol by Anschiitz's method ; it distils at 162° under 25m m. pressure : after this has passed over, a second product was obtained, to which reference will be made later.— J. Ch. S. 1898 A.I., p. 513 et seq.
N. 0. DROSERACEÆ.
485. Drosera peltata, Sm. h.f.b.l, i. 424.
Vern. :-Mukha-jali (H.); Chitra (Pb.)
Habitat: — Throughout India.
A perennial herb. Stem erect, leafy, 3-12in. high, simple or corymbose upward. Leaves alternate, long-petioled, lunate-peltate. Racemes subterminal. Pedicels ⅓-½in. long. Flowers white, sepals ovate, glabrous, erose or fimbriate. Styles 3, fim briate. Seeds obovoid. Testa prominently reticuluted.
Part used : — The leaf.
Use : —The leaves of this curious and insectivorous plant, bruised and mixed with salt, are used as a blister in Kumaon. This same practice prevails, however, in Kanáwar, without the use of salt. All the members of this family have a bitter, acrid and caustic flavor. If placed in milk they rapidly curdle it (Watt).
(Improve this image)
# Indian Medicinal Plants/Natural Order Dipsaceæ

N. 0. DIPSACEÆ.
624. Morina persica, Linn, h.f.b.i.,iii. 216.
Vern. : — Bekh ahmar (H.)
Habitat : — Western Himalaya, from Kashmir to Kumaon.
Glabrous or softly pubescent herbs. Stems tall, 1½-4ft. Leaves 6 by lin., sessile, up to 9in., doubtly spinous-toothed hard, pubescent or glabrous. Flowers in axillary clusters ; white or faintly tinged with pink. Spikes elongate. Bracts free or nearly so, and involucels hairy or villous. Calyx-lobes subequal, obovate, oblong, entire or emarginate. 1/6-⅓in., by ⅛-¼in. Corolla-tube 1-1½in. Stamens 2 perfect, 2 rudimentary. Filaments longer that the Corolla-lobes. Stigma broad, disk-like. Achenes free within the involucel. In Kerner's Natural History of Plants 11,352. Oliver's English Translation, 1895, London, the flower of Morina persica is cited as instance of Autogamy " by ​the bending of the style to bring the stigmas into direct contact with the anthers belonging to the same flower or to place them in such a position beneath the anthers as to ensure their catching any pollen that may fall out of the loculi " (K. R. Kirtikar).
Use :— Mentioned in the ' Punjab Products ' amongst drugs, but no medicinal properties are given. Dr. Dymock, in a letter to Dr. Watt, states that he suspects the same species may prove the source of the Red Behen or Bahman of the Persians (Watt).
(Improve this image)
# In the Trenches

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "In the Trenches."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "In the Trenches", a two-part poem by Richard Aldington (Not that we are weary)
* "In the Trenches", a poem by Maurice Hewlett (As I lay in the trenches)
# In the Valley

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "In the Valley."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* In the Valley (1890), a novel by Harold Frederic
* In the Valley (1928), a play by Paul Green
* "In the Valley" (1929), a poem by Bertrande Harry Snell
* In the Valley (1922), a children's book by Katherine Merritte Snyder Yates

## See also

* Valley
# In the Valley (Yates)

* related portals: Marjorie and the Dream.
* sister projects: Commons category, Wikidata item.
Books By Katherine M. Yates
"Chet." With six illustrations. 12 mo, cloth, $1.75.
What the Pine Tree Heard. Boards, 65 cents.
The Grey Story Book. Octavo, boards, net 65 cents.
On the Way There. Octavo, boards, net 65 cents.
At the Door. Octavo, boards, net 65 cents.
Through the Woods. Octavo, boards, net 65 cents.
By the Roadside. Octavo, boards, net 65 cents.
Cheery and the Chum. Octavo, cloth, colored illustrations, net 60 cents.
Along the Trail. Octavo, boards, net 65 cents.
Up the Sunbeams. Octavo, boards, 65 cents.
On the Hill-top. Octavo, boards, 65 cents.
Harmony Shop Boston
A book hath more of the reader than of the writer between its covers. See that thou dost find good within thy books.
In which Marjorie finds out what was the matter in the valley,—and in the world.
In the Valley
By Katherine M. Yates
Author of On the Way There, At the Door, By the Roadside, Chet, Up the Sunbeams, etc.
The Harmony Shop 38 West St., Boston
Copyright, 1922, by Katherine M. Yates
To the gardenia lady, my first friend in Aloha Land
* Foreword
* In the Valley
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1951, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 72 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In the Valley of the Shadow

* "In the Valley of the Shadow" in The Smart Set (1903)
* "In the Valley of the Shadow" in Middle Aged Love Stories (1903)
# In the Town a Wild Bird singing

"Hark! Do I dream? Nay, even now I heard"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1912), "In the Town a Wild Bird singing" in Harper's Monthly Magazine (October 1912).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1912), "In the Town a Wild Bird singing" in The Unconquered Air, and Other Poems (1912).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "In the Town a Wild Bird singing" in Poems I.

## References

* ↑ View this version at Google Books.
# In the Valley (Yates)/Foreword

The little books of the "Marjorie and the Dream" series are not written primarily for children in years; but are for the little girl or boy within, who never has grown up, and never will grow up. Those who would find the kernel of these bits of allegory, have but to know that Marjorie is this ever-young child within; and the Dream, beside his dream character, is the prosecuting attorney, self-analysis, who asks us questions—questions which we all must answer either now or sometime in the years to come.
K. M. Y.
    Honolulu.
# Heiner v. Donnan

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
285 U.S. 312
Heiner v. Donnan
Argued: Feb. 26, 1932. --- Decided: March 21, 1932
The Attorney General and Mr. G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., for heiner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 313-317 intentionally omitted]
Mr. William G. Heiner, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for Donnan and others.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 317-319 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Heiner v. Mellon

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
304 U.S. 271
Heiner v. Mellon
Argued: March 8, 1938. --- Decided: May 16, 1938
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Golden W. Bell, Asst. Sol. Gen., for petitioner.
Mr. John G. Frazer, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondents.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Heiner v. Diamond Alkali Company

United States Supreme Court
288 U.S. 502
Heiner v. Diamond Alkali Company
Argued: Feb. 10, 1933. --- Decided: March 13, 1933
The Attorney General, and Mr. G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioners.
Mr. John W. Davis, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Heinemann v. Rollins

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
120 U.S. 82
Heinemann v. Rollins
Patrick A. Collins, for plaintiffs in error.
Sol. Gen. Jenks, for defendants in error.
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Heiner v. Colonial Trust Company Lewellyn

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
275 U.S. 232
Heiner v. Colonial Trust Company Lewellyn
Argued: Oct. 7, 1927. --- Decided: Nov 21, 1927
The Attorney General and Mr. Wm. D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for petitioners.
Messers. R. C. Allen and I. J. Underwood, both of Tulsa, Okl., and Charles Alvin Jones and M. W. Acheson, Jr., both of Pittsburgh, Pa., and John W. Davis, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# International Boxing Club of New York v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
358 U.S. 242
International Boxing Club of New York v. United States
Argued: Nov. 13, 1958. --- Decided: Jan 12, 1959
[Syllabus from pages 242-243 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Kenneth C. Royall, New York City, for appellants.
Mr. Philip Elman, Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# International Bridge Company v. New York

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
254 U.S. 126
International Bridge Company v. New York
Argued: Dec. 16, 1919. ---
Restored to the Docket for Reargument, Jan. 26, 1920.
Reargued Oct. 11, 12, 1920.
Decided Nov. 22, 1920.
Mr. Adelbert Moot and Mrs. Helen Z. M. Rodgers, both of Buffalo, N. Y., for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. James S. G. Ivins, of Albany, N. Y., and Ralph Averill Kellogg, of Buffalo, N. Y., for the People of the State of New York.
[Argument of Counsel from page 127 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse