OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 6/Representative men: Men of letters - Abelard, Petrarch, the Scaligers, Herder, Gibbon

The people discussed in this article are Peter Abelard (1079–1142), Petrarch (1304–1374), Julius Caesar Scaliger (1484–1558), Joseph Justus Scaliger (1540–1609), Johann Gottfried Herder (1744–1803), and Edward Gibbon (1737–1794).
​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/113 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/114 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/115 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/116 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/117 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/118 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/119 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1861 to June 1862.pdf/120
# Northcross v. Board of Education of the Memphis, Tennessee City Schools

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Burger
United States Supreme Court
397 U.S. 232
Northcross v. Board of Education of the Memphis, Tennessee City Schools
Jack Greenberg and James M. Nabrit III, for petitioners.
Jack Petree, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Northcross v. Board of Education of the Memphis, Tennessee City Schools/Concurrence Burger

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Burger
United States Supreme Court
397 U.S. 232
Northcross v. Board of Education of the Memphis, Tennessee City Schools
Mr. Chief Justice BURGER, concurring in the result.
Save for one factor, I would grant the petition and set the case for expedited argument at a special sitting, if necessary. The factor which is a barrier to taking this step now in this particular case is that one Justice would not be able to participate, thus limiting the Court to seven justices. I would do this on the basis that the time has come to clear up what seems to be a confusion, genuine or simulated, concering this Court's prior mandates. By the time of No. 944, Carter v. West Feliciana Parish School Board, 396 U.S. 290, 90 S.Ct. 608, 24 L.Ed.2d 477 (1970), Mr. Justice Stewart and I indicated we preferred not to reach decision without first hearing oral argument.
These school cases present widely varying factors: some records reveal plans for desegregating schools, others have no plans or only partial plans; some records reflect rezoning of school districts, others do not; some use traditional bus transportation such as began with consolidated schools where such transportation was imperative, others use school bus transportation for a different purpose and unrelated to the availability of a school as to which such transportation is not required.
The suggestion that the Court has not defined a unitary school system is not supportable. In Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, 396 U.S. 19, 90 S.Ct. 29, 24 L.Ed.2d 19 (1969), we stated, albeit perhaps too cryptically, that a unitary system was one 'within which no person is to be effectively excluded from any school because of race or color.' From what is now before us in this case it is not clear what issues might be raised or developed on argument. As soon as possible, however, we ought to resolve some of the basic practical problems when they are appropriately presented including whether, as a constitutional matter, any particular racial balance must be achieved in the schools; to what extent school districts and zones may or must be altered as a constitutional matter; and to what extent transportation may or must be provided to achieve the ends sought by prior holdings of the Court. Other related issues may emerge.
However, for the reasons stated, namely that the Court is already disabled by one vacancy of long standing and further disabled in the particular case, I join in the result reached by the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Notes on equitation and horse training/Preface

War Department,
Office of the Chief of Staff,
Washington, July 16, 1910.
Authority having been obtained for the use of the Notes on Equitation and Horse Training, School of Application for Cavalry at Saumur, France, translated by Maj. George H. Cameron, Fourteenth Cavalry, assistant commandant, Mounted Service School, Fort Riley, Kans., and approved by a board of officers convened at the Mounted Service School, they are herewith published for the information of the Regular Army and the Organized Militia.
By order of the Secretary of War:
* Wm. H. Carter,
* Major-General, Acting Chief of Staff
# Notes on equitation and horse training/Question 13

See also the original scanned version (page images with accompanying text)

## XIII.

When and how should the gallop be exacted in the first part of horse training?—Almost invariably the gallop lesson should be begun early. There is then available an additional means of suppling the horse, of strengthening him, extending him, and pushing him straight ahead. But a fixed rule can not be laid down with horses and especially in this matter; the time to take up first work at a gallop depends upon the conformation of the horse, his condition, his leg development, and the kind of ground available. It would be stupidity to gallop frequently on a colt that drags his legs and is disunited at a trot and that has difficulty in holding up the part essential to training. On the other hand it is proper to gallop repeatedly on a vigorous horse that has been worked before purchase, on the horse with good strong legs, and particularly after he has been thoroughly confirmed in the correct trot.
This is a matter of common sense and experience; a horseman will promptly decide at what moment he can profitably begin gallop work with the horse he is riding or with the squad he is instructing.
The gallop by increase of gait—Utility of work on a circle.—Passing from the walk to the gallop may be considered as a test of advanced training; it will therefore be entirely out of place at this stage, and we must take up the gallop only by increasing the gait from the trot. Moreover, it is essential that the horse shall work equally well on both sides, and since, on the circle, the horse is set to lead on the inside leg we have an opportunity to insure the gallop lead on either foot.
Increasing the gait from a trot on a circle furnishes therefore the means of fulfilling the two essential conditions just cited.
The aids to be used are both legs and the outside rein. The two legs, by steadily forcing an increased gait, push the horse into the gallop. A slight tension on the outside rein prevents the horse from swinging the haunches out, and consequently precludes a false lead or a disunited gallop.
The circle is the best means to give the gallop lesson when the squad to be drilled is rather large in numbers.
Besides the advantages already enumerated, troopers are enabled to work without interfering with each other, in spite of the difference in speed which manifests itself in the gallop of young horses. But if the number of troopers working in the hall is limited it is possible to secure the lead on the desired foot by increasing the gait from the trot at the corner, or on the completion of a flank movement, or at the end of a movement to change hands.
The gallop must be attained at the moment the horse begins the change of direction; for if he does not relinquish the trot until the change of direction is completed his haunches can easily swing out and the favorable opportunity is lost.
# Notes on equitation and horse training

* related portals: Horsemanship.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
See also the original scanned version (page images with accompanying text)
Notes on Equitation and Horse Training
In answer to the examination questions at the
School of Application for Cavalry
Washington Government Printing Office 1910
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Oregon Historical Quarterly/Volume 13/Notes number 2

NOTES
The sixty-ninth anniversary of the organization of the first American civil government west of the Rocky Mountains was celebrated at Champoeg, thirty-three miles south of Portland, on May 2, 1912, for the twelfth time. Ex-Governor T. T. Geer, a native son of Oregon, whose father came across the plains in 1847, was president of the day. The principal address was made by Mr. Frederick V. Holman, President of the Oregon Historical Society, and a well known lawyer of Portland. His subject was "A Brief History of the Oregon Provisional Government and What Caused Its Formation." Mr. Holman is also a native son of Oregon of the year 1852. His grandfather came to Oregon in 1843 and his father and mother in 1846. The sole survivor of the one hundred and two persons who were present on May 2, 1842 Mr. Francois Xavier Matthieu was on the platform. He passed his ninety- fourth birthday on April 2nd. With the exception of his eyesight, he is an unusually vigorous man, both mentally and physically. Following Mr. Holman, short addresses in the nature of greetings to the assembled pioneers, their descendants and friends, were made by Mrs. La Reine Helen Baker and Mr. Samuel Hill. Upwards of one thousand persons were in attendance.
Through the initiative of Mr. Joseph Buchtel, a pioneer of 1852, and a number of other pioneers, fifteen acres of land adjacent to the site of Champoeg where the historic meeting of May 2, 1843, was held, and the spot now marked by a small monument, has been secured, and an effort will be made to secure state aid in the near future and convert it into a state park, one feature of which will be a suitable auditorium in which to hold annual celebrations.
The fortieth annual reunion of the Oregon Pioneer Association was held in Portland at the Masonic Temple on June 20th. Robert A. Miller, President, presided. The annual address was delivered by Hon. Robert G. Smith, Mayor of Grants Pass, Josephine County. The annual banquet, provided by the Pioneer Woman's Auxiliary, was laid in the Multnomah County ​Armory. Twelve hundred sat at the tables. No one can be a member of the Oregon Pioneer Association except those who came to, or was born in, some part of the original "Oregon Country" prior to January; 1, 1860. Only one exception is made, and that is in connection with California. Any one who came to, or were born in, that State prior to January 1, 1860, now residing in Oregon, are eligible to membership upon the same terms as if they had always been residents of Oregon. The average age of the twelve hundred pioneers present at the reunion was sixty-nine years. It was not an uncommon experience for persons attending this reunion to meet old acquaintances whom they had not seen for periods of twenty to fifty years, and in one case sixty-four years.
# Oregon Historical Quarterly/Volume 14
## Number 1 (March)

* Report of Lieutenant Neil M. Howison on Oregon, 1846: A Reprint
* Oregon in 1863. by Thomas W. Prosch
* An Indian Agent's Experience in the War of 1886. by Henry C. Coe
* "Documents": Cost of Improvements Made by Dr. John McLoughlin at Willamette Falls to Jan. 1, 1951
* "Review": Economic Beginnings of the Far West, by Katharine Coman. by essay by F. G. Young

## Number 2 (June)

* Harvey W. Scott, Editor--Review of His Half-Century Career and Estimate of His Work. by Alfred Holman
* Mr. Scott's Extensive Library As a Gauge of His Broad Scholarship and Literary Activity. by Charles H. Chapman
* Review of Mr. Scott's Writings on His Favorite and Most Important Subjects. by Leslie M. Scott
* Harvey W. Scott [verse]. by William P. Perkins
* Tributes to Mr. Scott's Achievements in Journalism

## Number 3 (September)

* Letter by Daniel H. Lownsdale to Samuel R. Thurston, First Territorial Delegate from Oregon to Congress. by intro. by Clarence B. Bagley
* Journal of E. Willard Smith while with the Fur Traders, Vasquez and Sublette, in the Rocky Mountain Region, 1839-1840. by edit. notes by J. Neilson Barry
* Journal of John Work's Snake Country Expedition of 1830-31. by edit. notes by T. C. Elliott
* Why Not a Folk Festival in the Rose Festival?. by F. G. Young

## Number 4 (December)

* Reminiscences of Captain William P. Gray. by Fred Lockley
* Letters by Burr Osborn, Survivor of the Howison Expedition to Oregon, 1846. by edited by George H. Himes
* Journal of Alexander Ross--Snake Country Expedition, 1824. by edit. notes by T. C. Elliott

## Index

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# On Friendship

* "Friendship's a Jewel", in The Old Man Outwitted, or, The Fortunate Lovers (1804), a chapbook printed in Glasgow
* "On Friendship", in The Ewie wi' the Crooked Horn (1828), a chapbook printed in Glasgow
# On Friendship and XXIX Sonnets

Layout 2
MONTAIGNE'S ESSAY ON FRIENDSHIP AND XXIX SONNETS BY Estienne de La Boetie ❦
MONTAIGNE'S ESSAY ON FRIENDSHIP & XXIX SONNETS By Estienne de La Boetie Translated into English by Louis How
Houghton Mifflin Company Boston and New York
Copyright, 1915, by Louis How All rights reserved Published October 1915
TO CAROLINE RUUTZ-REES
CONTENTS
# On First Looking into Chapman's Homer

* "On First Looking into Chapman's Homer", in The Poetical Works of John Keats (1884)
* "On First Looking into Chapman's Homer", in The Complete Poetical Works and Letters of John Keats (1899), edited by Horace Elisha Scudder
* "On First Looking Into Chapman's Homer", in Poems That Every Child Should Know (1904), edited by Mary Elizabeth Burt
* "On First Looking into Chapman's Homer" in the Oxford Book of English Verse 1250-1900 (1931), edited by Arthur Quiller-Couch
* "On First Looking into Chapman's Homer" in the Oxford Book of English Verse 1250-1918 (1940), edited by Arthur Quiller-Couch
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 4/The silver cord - Part 23

←Part 22Part 24→
​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/432 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/433 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/434 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/435 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/436 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/437 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/438
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 4/The silver cord - Part 22

←Part 21Part 23→
​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/404 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/405 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/406 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/407 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/408 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/409 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/410
# Pastorals Epistles Odes (1748)/To the Memory of the late Earl of Halifax

To the Memory of the late
EARL of HALIFAX.
June 30, 1718.
# Pastorals Epistles Odes (1748)/To the Right Honourable Robert Walpole Esq

To the Right Honourable
ROBERT WALPOLE Esq;
June 15, 1724.
# Pat-a-cake

* related portals: Nursery rhymes.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
Also Patty-cake: one of the oldest and most widely known surviving English nursery rhymes. It has a Roud Folk Song Index number of 6486. The rhyme is often accompanied by a hand-clapping game.
The earliest recorded version of the rhyme appears in Thomas D'Urfey's play The Campaigners (1698), where a nurse says to her charges: "pat a cake Bakers man, so I will master as I can, and prick it, and prick it, and prick it, and prick it, and prick it, and throw't into the Oven." The next appearance is in Mother Goose's Melody (c. 1765).
* "Patty Cake" in Tommy Thumb's Song Book by Nurse Lovechild (1815 edition).
* "Pat a cëake, pat a cëake, bëaker's man" in Dorsetshire Children's Games, &c by John Symonds Udal (The Folk-Lore Journal, 1889)
* "Pat-a-cake! Pat-a-cake! Baker's man" in A Book of Nursery Songs and Rhymes by Sabine Baring-Gould (1895).
* "Pat-a-cake" in A Book of Nursery Rhymes by Charles Welsh (1901).
* "Pat-a-Cake" in The Real Mother Goose by Blanche Fisher Wright (1916)
# Pastorals Epistles Odes (1748)/To the Right Honourable William Pulteney Esq

To the Right Honourable William Pulteney Esq;
May 1, 1723.
# Patapsco Guano Company v. Board of Agriculture of North Carolina

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
171 U.S. 345
Patapsco Guano Company v. Board of Agriculture of North Carolina
Thomas N. Hill and John W. Hinsdale, for appellant.
R. H. Battle, F. H. Busbee, and J. C. L. Harris, for appellees.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pastorals Epistles Odes (1748)/To the Right Honourable Charles Lord Halifax

1714.
# Pastyme With Good Company

a song preserved in a manuscript now in the collection of the British Museum (BM Addl. MSS. 31,922; Addl. MSS. 5,665; MSS. Reg. Appendix 58). In the opinion of some, both words and music were almost certainly written by Henry VIII of England.
In the 1548 work The Complaynt of Scotland, the author mentions "Pastance with gude companye" as being among the popular songs within the kingdom of Scotland in the early part of the 16th century.
    Passetyme with good companye
    I love, and shall until I dye;
    Grugge who wyll, but none deny,
    So God be pleeyd, this lyfe wyll I:
    For my pastaunce,
    Hunt, syng, and daunce,
    My hert ys sett;
    All godely sport,
    To my comfort,
    Who shall me lett?
    Youth wyll have nedes dalyaunce,
    Of good or yll some pastaunce,
    Companye me thynketh them best,
    All thouts and fantasyes to dygest.
    For ydleness,
    Ys chef mastres
    Of vices all:
    Than who can say,
    But passe the day
    Ys best of all.
    Company with honeste,
    Ys vertu and vyce to flee;
    Company ys gode or yll,
    But ev'ry man hath hys frewylle;
    The best I sew,
    The worst eschew,
    My mynd shall be:
    Vertue to use,
    Vyce to refuse,
    I shall use me.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Patapan

Originally titled "Guillô, Pran Ton Tamborin": carol from the collection Noei borguignon (1720), written under the pseudonym "Gui Barozai".
English-language translations of Patapan include:
Untranslated editions in the original Burgundian French include:
# Philosophical Works of the Late James Frederick Ferrier/Institutes of Metaphysic (1875)/Section 2/Proposition 6

The Institutes of Metaphysic, Philosophical Works of the Late James Frederick Ferrier (1875 ed., Vol. 1). (E. L. Lushington, & A. Grant, Eds.) Edinburgh: William Blackwood and Sons. pp. 428-429.
PROPOSITION VI.
IGNORANCE OF THE UNIVERSAL AND PARTICULAR.
DEMONSTRATION.
We cannot be ignorant of the universal element apart from the particular element, or of the particular element apart from the universal element of cognition, because (by Prop. VI. Epistemology) there can be no knowledge of the universal apart from the particular, or of the particular apart from the universal. But what there can be no knowledge of; there can be no ignorance of (Prop. III. Agnoiology). Therefore we cannot be ignorant of the universal element of cognition per se, or of the particular element of cognition per se.
OBSERVATIONS AND EXPLANATIONS.
1. Just as the preceding propositions (IV. and V.) are the obverse of the second and fourth of the ​Effect of this proposition.epistemology; so this proposition is the obverse of the sixth of the epistemology. It excludes from our ignorance the universal and the particular elements of cognition, when unaccompanied by each other—just as Proposition VI. of the epistemology excluded them from our knowledge.
Sixth counter-proposition.2. Sixth Counter-proposition.—"We can be ignorant of the universal element of cognition per se, and also of the particular element per se."
The error which it involves.3. Like Counter-proposition VI. of the epistemology, this counter-proposition makes no distinction between elements of cognition and kinds of cognition; or rather it mistakes elements for kinds, and hence it falls into a contradiction. If the particular and the universal were kinds of cognition, it would be quite possible for us to be ignorant of either without being ignorant of the other; because, in that case, it would be possible for either to be known without the other being known. But, since the particular and the universal are not kinds, but are mere elements of cognition, it is not possible for us to be ignorant of either without being ignorant of the other, because it is not possible for either to be known without the other being known.
# Philosophical Works of the Late James Frederick Ferrier/Institutes of Metaphysic (1875)/Section 2/Proposition 4

The Institutes of Metaphysic, Philosophical Works of the Late James Frederick Ferrier (1875 ed., Vol. 1). (E. L. Lushington, & A. Grant, Eds.) Edinburgh: William Blackwood and Sons. pp. 417-418.
PROPOSITION IV.
IGNORANCE OF OBJECTS PER SE.
DEMONSTRATION.
We can be ignorant only of what can possibly be known (Prop. III Agnoiology). But objects without a subject cannot possibly be known (Props. I. and II. Epistemology.) Therefore we cannot be ignorant of objects without a subject; and thus there can be no ignorance of objects per se.
OBSERVATIONS AND EXPLANATIONS.
The truths now pour down fast.1. The truths of the agnoiology now come down in a torrent. The epistemology has unlocked all the sluices. The opening propositions of the ​agnoiology have cleared away all obstructions which might remain; and we have now little more to do than to look on while the waters take their own unimpeded course. The counter-propositions will be rapidly swept away before the irresistible flood.
Fourth counter-proposition—is swept away.2. Fourth Counter-proposition.—"We can be ignorant of objects without a subject; in other words, we can be, and we are, ignorant of objects per se, or out of relation to a mind." This counter-proposition goes down in an instant. There can be no ignorance, in any quarter, of an object without a subject or mind, simply because there can be no knowledge in any quarter, of an object without a subject or mind.