OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Two songs entitled Yankee Doodle/Yankee Doodle

YANKEE DOODLE.
Father and I went down to camp, along with Captain Goodwin, And there we saw the men and boys as thick as hasty pudding.
Yankee Doodle keep it up, Yankee Doodle dandy, Mind the music and the step, and with the girls be handy.
And there was Captain Washington, upon a slapping stallion,
A-giving orders to his men—I guess there was a million.
Yankee Doodle, &c.
And there they had a swamping gun, as big as a log of maple, On a deuced little cart—a load for father's cattle.
Yankee Doodle, &c.
But I can't tell you half I see, they kept up such a smother: So I took my hat off, made a bow, and scampered home to mother.
Yankee Doodle, &c.
# Two songs entitled Yankee Doodle/Yankee Doodle No. 2

YANKEE DOODLE, NO. 2
Ye gallant sons of Liberty, Who bravely have defended Your country's right, by land or sea, And to her cause attended. Yankee Doodle is the tune The Americans delight in. It will do to whistle, sing and play, And just the thing for fighting.
Upon the ocean's wide domain Our tars are firm and true, sirs, And Freedom's cause they will maintain, With Yankee Doodle doo, sirs. Yankee Doodle, &c.
The Fourth day of July, 'tis said, That day did Britain rue, sirs, When an independent tune we play'd, Call'd Yankee Doodle doo, sirs. Yankee Doodle, &c.
Columbia's sons did then declare They would be independent, And for King George they would not care, Nor yet for his descendant. Yankee Doodle, &c.
British tars think that they can Whip Yankees one to two, sirs, But only give us man to man, They'll see what we can do, sirs. Yankee Doodle, &c.
Yankee Doodle, boys, huzza! Down outside up the middle. Yankee Doodle, fa so la, Trunpet, drum and fiddle. Yankee Doodle, &c.
# Two speeches of Robert R. Torrens, Esq., M.P., on emigration, and the colonies

* related portals: Emigration, Colonies and colonization.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, quotes, Wikidata item.
TWO SPEECHES
OF
ROBERT R. TORRENS, Esq., M.P.,
ON
EMIGRATION,
AND
THE COLONIES.
IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS
MARCH 1, AND APRIL 26, 1870.
EXTRACTED FROM
"HANSARD'S PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES,"
VOLS. CXCIX.-CC.
LONDON: CORNELIUS BUCK, 23, PATERNOSTER ROW, E.C.
LONDON: CORNELIUS BUCK, 23, PATERNOSTER ROW, E.C.
* Emigration
* The Colonies
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Two swimmers wrestled on the spar—

* "Two swimmers wrestled on the spar" in Poems (1890)
* "Two swimmers wrestled on the spar" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# Tyranny Unmasked

John Taylor (1753-1824) was a Jeffersonian Democrat and author of several works on politics, including Tyranny Unmasked, a work decrying the protective tariff put in place by the federal government.
* Preface
* Section I
* Section II
* Section III
# Tyrell's Heirs v. Rountree

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
32 U.S. 464
Tyrell's Heirs v. Rountree

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tyranny

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Tyranny."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Tyranny (Lanier)
* Tyranny (Gibran)
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/6th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 44

Chap. XLIV.—An Act to authorize the allowance of a credit to William Tarewell.
Allowance to William Tazewell.Be it enacted, &c., That in settling the accounts of William Tazewell, secretary of Elbridge Gerry, late envoy extraordinary from the United States of America to the French Republic, the Secretary of State ​be, and he is hereby authorized to allow the reasonable expenses incurred by the said William Tazewell, in consequence of his being captured on his return to the United States.
Approved, May 7, 1800.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/6th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 2

Chap. II.—An Act for the relief of Solomon Boston.
Solomon Boston to be discharged from jail.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That Solomon Boston, now confined in the public gaol of Kent county in the State of Delaware, be released and discharged, and he hereby is released and discharged from all claim and demand of the United States, to a certain judgment, for a penalty of one thousand dollars, recovered at their suit in the District Court of the District of Delaware; saving and reserving, nevertheless, the right and interest which belongs to any third person, if any such exist.
Approved, January 30, 1801.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/6th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 18

Chap. XVIII.—An Act to extend the privilege of franking letters and packages to Martha Washington.
Privilege of franking letters &c. extended to Martha Washington.Be it enacted, &c., That all letters and packages to and from Martha Washington relict of the late General George Washington, shall be received and conveyed by post free of postage, for and during her life.
Approved, April 3, 1800.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/6th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 71

Chap. LXXI.—An Act to make further provision for the children of Colonel John Harding, and Major Alexander Trueman, deceased.
Act of Feb. 22, 1793 ch. 14. Further provision for the children of Colonel Harding and Major Trueman.Be it enacted, &c., That there shall be annually paid to the guardians respectively of the sons and daughters of the late Colonel John Harding, deceased, and to the guardian of the daughter of the late Major Alexander Trueman, deceased, for each son and daughter aforesaid, the sum of one hundred dollars, until they shall have respectively attained the age of twenty-one years, to be applied by the said several guardians to the suitable education of the said sons, and to the use of the said daughters.
Approved, May 14, 1800.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/6th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 10

Chap. X.—An Act for the relief of Nathaniel Holmes.
Account of Major Nathaniel Holmes to be settled.Be it enacted, &c., That the accounting officers of the Treasury be, and they are hereby authorized and directed to settle the account of Major Nathaniel Holmes, and allow him such sums of money, as shall appear to have been paid by him for transporting and victualling a detachment of troops, from his battalion, in the winter of one thousand seven hundred and ninety-four, and of one thousand seven hundred and ninety-five, from Cape May to Trenton.
Approved, February 25, 1801.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/6th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 20

Chap. XX.—An Act to discharge Robert Sturgeon from imprisonment.
Robert Sturgeon to be discharged from imprisonment.Be it enacted, &c., That the keeper of the prison in Lewistown, county of Mifflin, and State of Pennsylvania, be, and he is hereby authorized and directed to release Robert Sturgeon from imprisonment, on a process in favor of the United States, by virtue of which he is now imprisoned:Proviso. Provided, he obtains and produces to him, the said keeper, a certificate from the Secretary of the Treasury, that he the said Robert has assigned and conveyed all his estate, real and personal, in his possession, or to which he is entitled, to some person or persons, for the use of the United States, under the direction and to the satisfaction of the Secretary of the Treasury, which certificate shall be sufficient authority for the keeper of said prison to release said Robert, so far as he is holden, by virtue of said process, in favour of the United States.Proviso. And provided also, That the judgment obtained, or to be obtained on said process, shall remain in full force against any estate the said Robert may hereafter acquire.
Approved, April 5, 1800.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/6th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 7

Chap. VII.—An Act for the relief of John Vaughan.
Allowance to John Vaughan.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the accounting officers of the treasury be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to settle the account of John Vaughan, and to allow him the amount of the difference in his favor, which would result from calculating the silver bullion by him deposited, previous to the month of December, in the year one thousand seven hundred and ninety-five, in the mint of the United States, for coinage, at the rate of one thousand four hundred and eighty-five parts fine to one hundred and seventy-nine parts alloy, instead of the rate of nine parts fine to one part alloy, and that the same be paid out of any moneys in the treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, February 11, 1800.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/6th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 24

Chap. XXIV.—An Act for the relief of the corporation of Rhode Island college.
Compensation for injuries to Rhode Island College.Be it enacted, &c., That the accounting officers of the treasury be, and they are hereby authorized and directed to liquidate and settle the claims of the corporation of Rhode Island college, for compensation for the use and occupation of the edifice of the said college, and for injuries done to the same, from the tenth day of December, one thousand seven hundred and seventy-six, to the twentieth day of April, one thousand seven hundred and eighty, by the troops of the United States; and that the sum which may be found due to the said corporation, for damages done to and occupation of the said edifice, as aforesaid, be paid them out of any moneys in the treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, April 16, 1800.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/6th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 52

Chap. LII.—An Act for the relief of Ithamar Canfield.
Three land warrants to be issued to Ithamar Canfield, assignee, &c.Be it enacted, &c., That the proper officer be, and he is hereby authorized and directed to issue three land warrants, of one hundred acres each, to Ithamar Canfield, assignee to Eliphalet Tomlinson, Jabez Tomlinson, and Abraham Shelly, who served the United States as soldiers during the revolutionary war, and became entitled to the said lands by virtue of a resolution of Congress: Provided, the transfers and powers of attorney are made out pursuant to the rules in such cases established at the war office.
Approved, May 10, 1800.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/6th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 14

Chap. XIV.—An Act for the relief of Arnold Henry Dorhman, or his legal representatives.
Patent for land to be issuedBe it enacted, &c., That the President of the United States be, and he is hereby authorized to issue a patent for the thirteenth township, in the seventh range, to Arnold Henry Dorhman, or his legal ​representatives agreeably to a resolution of Congress of the first day of October, in the year one thousand seven hundred and eighty-seven.
Approved, February 27, 1801
# United States v. Babbitt

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Babbitt."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Babbitt (95 U.S. 334)
* United States v. Babbitt (104 U.S. 767)
# United States v. Babbitt (104 U.S. 767)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
104 U.S. 767
United States v. Babbitt
APPEAL from the Court of Claims.
Lawrence S. Babbitt reported at the Military Academy at West Point as a candidate for admission, June 11, 1857, and was admitted as a conditional cadet on the first day of the following month. He received his warrant as a cadet, Feb. 6, 1858. He was graduated from that institution July 1, 1861, and commissioned a second lieutenant of artillery June 24 of that year. He has served continuously in the army ever since. The accounting officers, in computing his longevity pay, held that his period of service commenced from the date of his commission as such second lieutenant, while he claimed that he should be credited also with the time he remained at the academy. He brought suit against the United States to recover the difference in his pay between the sum which they allowed and that to which he would have been entitled had they adopted his manner of stating the account.
The seventh section of the act of June 18, 1878, c. 263 (20 Stat. 145), is as follows: 'That on and after the passage of this act, all officers of the army of the United States who have served as officers in the volunteer forces during the war of the rebellion, or as enlisted men in the armies of the United States, regular or volunteer, shall be, and are hereby, credited with the full time they may have served as such officers and as such enlisted men, in computing their service for longevity pay and retirement.'
The Court of Claims announced a decision adverse to the claimant; but for the reasons stated in the opinion of this court judgment was rendered in his favor. The United States appealed, and assign for error that the court erred in computing the plaintiff's service, and should have excluded therefrom the time he was a cadet at West Point.
The Solictor-General for the United States.
Mr. William Penn Clarke for the appellee.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Babbitt (104 U.S. 767)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
104 U.S. 767
United States v. Babbitt
The question presented to the court below on the trial of this case was, whether in the computation of longevity pay for an officer of the army of the United States, under the provisions of sect. 7 of the act of June 18, 1878, c. 263 (20 Stat. 145), his period of service as a cadet at West Point was to be taken into account. The court decided it was not, and an elaborate opinion to that effect was filed; but the record shows that, after the decision was announced, a pro forma judgment was rendered, with the consent of the Attorney-General, in favor of the claimant. This is stated in the judgment to have been done because the case was one of a class, and the claimant, if judgment should be given against him, could not appeal. In Pacific Railroad v. Ketchum (101 U.S. 289), we decided that when a decree was rendered by consent, no errors would be considered here on an appeal which were in law waived by such a consent. In our opinion, this case comes within that rule. The consent to the judgment below was in law a waiver of the error now complained of. For this reason the judgment below must be affirmed; and it is
So ordered.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Babcock Same

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
250 U.S. 328
United States v. Babcock Same
Argued: April 15, 1919. --- Decided: June 2, 1919
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Frierson, for the United States.
Mr. George A. King, of Washington, D. C., for appellees.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Babbitt (95 U.S. 334)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
95 U.S. 334
United States v. Babbitt
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Iowa.
This is an action of debt upon a bond given by Lysander W. Babbitt and the other defendants to the United States, on the ninth day of May, 1853, to recover the sum of $10,000 alleged to have been charged and received by him, during his term of office, as fees for the location of military bounty-land warrants under the provisions of the acts of Congress approved the 11th of February, 1847, the 28th of September, 1850, the 22d of March, 1852, and the 3d of March, 1855, over and above the maximum compensation of $3,000 which he, as such register, was authorized to retain. The bond was conditioned as follows:--
'Whereas the President of the United States hath, pursuant to law, appointed the said Lysander W. Babbitt register of the land-office for the district of land subject to sell at Kanesville, in the State of Iowa, for the term of four years from the sixth day of April, 1853, by commission dated the eighth day of April, 1853: Now, therefore, if the said Lysander W. Babbitt has truly and faithfully executed and discharged, and shall continue truly and faithfully to execute and discharge, all the duties of the said office, according to law, then the above obligation to be void and of none effect; otherwise it shall abide and remain in full force and virtue.'
The defendants, Hall and Burnett, as the sureties on the bond, among other pleas, pleaded separately for themselves that it was no part of the official duties of Babbitt, as such register, to receive the said fees, and that he was not required, by the obligations of said bond, to pay the same to the United States.
Babbitt, for himself alone, among other pleas, pleaded the same defence.
To each of these several pleas the United States demurred.
The court overruled the demurrers, and rendered final judgment in favor of all the defendants.
On the hearing of the demurrers and in the rendition of said judgment, the judges were opposed in opinion upon two questions, which are set forth in the opinion of the court. The United States sued out this writ of error.
Mr. Assistant Attorney-General Smith for the plaintiff in error.
No counsel appeared for the defendants in error.
MR. JUSTICE SWAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Babbitt (95 U.S. 334)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
95 U.S. 334
United States v. Babbitt
This case comes before us upon a certificate of a division of opinion of the judges by whom the case was tried in the Circuit Court.
The questions certified are:--
1. Whether it was the duty of the defendant Babbitt, as register of the land-office, to receive the register's fees from the locators of military bounty-land warrants, upon their being located on the public lands, subject to private entry by such warrants, under the acts of Feb. 11, 1847, Sept. 28, 1850, March 22, 1852, and March 3, 1855.
2. Whether, if such fees were charged and received by Babbitt, as such register, his neglect and refusal to account for and pay over to the United States the surplus, over and above the maximum compensation authorized to be by him received, as determined in this case by the Supreme Court of the United States, in United States v. Babbit, 1 Black, 55, constitutes a breach of the conditions of the official bond of Babbitt, as register, as respects himself alone, and also as respects the sureties in the bond, and whether in such case the remedy is not by an action against Babbitt for money had and received.
The reported case, to which reference is made, contains a careful analysis of the acts of Congress mentioned in the first question, and of several others r lating to the subject. It is unnecessary to go over the same ground again, or to reproduce any thing there said.
It was held in that case that $3,000 per annum was the maximum compensation allowed to the register by law, and that he was not entitled to hold in addition the fees in question in his own right.
The act of March 3, 1853, requires that 'the surplus which shall remain' of such fees, beyond the compensation to which the register is entitled, 'shall be paid into the Treasury of the United States as other moneys.'
There could be no paying without previous receiving. The latter duty is explicitly declared. The prior one is as clearly to be inferred. Both would be alike implied in the absence of the provision as to paying over.
What is implied in a statute, will, deed, or contract is as much a part of it as what is expressed. United States v. Babbit, supra.
The first question certified must, therefore, be answered in the affirmative.
To the second it must be answered, that, if the register received such fees, the neglect and refusal to pay over to the United States the surplus beyond the compensation to which he was entitled by law was a breach of the condition of his official bond, both as respects himself and the sureties in the bond, and that the United States is under no necessity to proceed against the principal in the bond by an action on the case for money had and received.
The judgment will be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in conformity to this opinion; and it is
So ordered.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/18th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 111

Chap. CXI.—An Act to extend the time of issuing and locating military land warrants to officers and soldiers of the revolutionary army.
The time limited by the act of Feb. 24th, 1819, ch. 41, for issuing military land warrants, extended.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the time limited by the second section of the act approved the twenty-fourth day of February, one thousand eight hundred and nineteen, for issuing military land warrants to the officers and soldiers of the revolutionary army, shall be extended till the fourth of March, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-seven, and the time for locating the unlocated warrants shall be extended till the first day of October thereafter.
Approved, March 3, 1825.