OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Folk-lore of the Telugus/The Crane and the Swan

XXXVIII.
THE CRANE AND THE SWAN.
In days long gone by there lived on the banks of the Krishna, a crane on a silk-cotton tree. Once upon a time it beckoned a swan passing by and said:—"Your body resembles mine in colour, but your beak and legs are red. I have not come across a bird of your kind till now. Who are you? What is your errand?"
Whereupon the swan gave the following answer:—"I am a swan, I am an inhabitant of Brahma's Manasasaras. I am coming thence."
The crane then asked what things were procurable there and what formed the chief article of its food. To which the swan replied:—"As these things are made by angelic hands, it is beyond my comprehension to describe the grandeur of the place; but you may hear some of the important things procurable. In and around that region are found golden earth, ambrosia, gold lotuses, heaps of pearls, clouds of perfumes, and the tree of paradise. Every object thereof is a wonder." ​ When the swan informed the crape that it partook of the buds of such lotuses, the latter impatiently asked the former if any oysters were procurable there. On receiving a reply in the negative, the latter burst into a fit of laughter and said;—"Why prattle of the excellences of a place void of oysters? It is a pity you do not know the excellences of oysters." Thus the crane put the swan to shame.
Moral:—People will talk big about the meanest things if they like them, and disparagingly of the best things if they do not like them.
# Folk-lore of the Telugus/The Hare and the Elephants

XXXV.
THE HARE AND THE ELEPHANTS.
A famine, in days long gone by, once devastated the whole of the southern country, and there was not a drop of water visible in pond, lake, well or tank. The elephants, very much troubled by thirst, went in search of a place where they could satisfy it to their heart's content, and found a tank called Chandrapushkarani. As the tank was full to the brim, they rested there and quenched their thirst, and also found a habitation in the woods adjacent, till the whole country was again green with verdure. But the track of these elephants was full of hares, and they were smashed to pieces under their heavy footsteps. The hares, seeing the calamity that had befallen them, and how they were greatly reduced in numbers, met at a certain spot to devise means for sending the elephants away to a distant spot. One of them said:—Why fear the elephants? I have devised means to get rid of them." ​ On a certain moon-light night, it climbed and sat on an adjacent mountain-top, and said to the elephants who came by, as usual, to drink from the tank:—"O, ye elephants, I have been deputed by Chandra (the moon), whose tank it is, to inform you that this tank has been dug under Ids orders. That is the reason way it goes under the name of Chandrapushkarani (lit., the moon's tank). He comes here every night and dallies with his wives. For some time past he has been interrupted in his pastime by your advent and meddling with the waters. He is, therefore, very angry with you. Quit the tank instantly, or otherwise, he told me, he would smash you up ere dawn. If you want to see whether he is angry or not, just look into this tank and you will be satisfied."
The elephants were wonder-struck, and seeing the reflection of the moon, agitated by the wind in the waters, mistook it for his wrath with them, bowed to the moon, requested him to excuse them as they had come there in innocence, and desired the hare to intercede ​with the moon on their behalf. The elephants thereupon, quitted the place instantly, and the hares from that time forward lived comfortably.
# Folk-lore of the Telugus/The Mussalman and the Robber

XIX.
THE MUSSALMAN AND THE ROBBER.
There lived at Rajahmundry a Mussalman whose house was robbed one night. After careful search he traced some of the lost articles to the house of a person, whom he suspected for more reasons than one to be the rogue, and took him therefore before the Judge. The Judge asked the Mussalman if he had any positive proof that the prisoner was the person who had robbed his house. He answered in the negative; whereupon the Judge told him that he must dismiss the case, as he was strictly forbidden by the law to enquire into cases, where there were no eye-witnesses to the fact. On hearing this, the Mussalman removed one of his slipppers and began to beat the rogue. The Judge, in a great passion, asked him what the matter was. He told him that it was because he had not communicated to him beforehand his intention of robbing his house, in order that he ​might have witnesses ready to prove his villany. The Judge was very much troubled at this reply and remained silent.
# Goldstein v. Cox (396 U.S. 471)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 471
Goldstein v. Cox
Argued: Nov. 17, 1969. --- Decided: Jan 26, 1970
John R. Vintilla, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellants.
Daniel M. Cohen, New York City, for appellees.
Mr. Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Goldwater v. Federal Communications Commission

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
379 U.S. 893
Goldwater v. Federal Communications Commission
Gerald D. Morgan, Arthur H. Schroeder, John B. Kenkel and John P. Bankson, Jr., for petitioner.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.
Dissenting opinion by Mr. Justice Goldberg from the denial of certiorari and application for expedited consideration, with whom Mr. Justice Black joins:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Goldstein v. Cox (389 U.S. 581)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 581
Goldstein v. Cox
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Zschernig v. Miller, 389 U.S. 429, 88 S.Ct. 664, 19 L.Ed.2d 683, decided this date.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Goldstone v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
325 U.S. 687
GOLDSTONE et al. v. UNITED STATES.
Argued: April 26, 1945. --- Decided: June 11, 1945
Mr. Eugene L. Bondy, of New York City, for petitioners.
Mr. Loring W. Post, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Goldstein v. Cox (396 U.S. 471)/Dissent Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Douglas
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 471
Goldstein v. Cox
Argued: Nov. 17, 1969. --- Decided: Jan 26, 1970
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, with whom Mr. Justice BLACK concurs, dissenting.
If summary judgment had been granted to appellant, there would be no question but that this Court would have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1253 over an appeal from that judgment, as it would constitute an 'order granting * * * an interlocutory or permanent injunction.' Similarly, there seems little room for argument that the denial of summary judgment to appellants constitutes an order 'denying * * * an interlocutory or permanent injunction,' since such injunctive relief was requested in appellants' complaint. The majority opinion relies on Switzerland Cheese Ass'n v. Horne's Market, 385 U.S. 23, 87 S.Ct. 193, 17 L.Ed.2d 23, as authority for dismissing this appeal for want of jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1253. In that case, however, the denial of summary judgment was based solely on the existence of a triable issue of fact; the summary judgment did not concern in any way the merits of the case. This case involves more. Appellants claimed that § 2218 of the New York Surrogate's Court Procedure Act was unconstitutional on its face. The denial of summary judgment constituted a rejection of this claim on the merits, as well as a denial of injunctive relief based on that claim. On this basis, I would find jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1253 to decide this appeal on the merits.

## Notes

* ↑ The appellants' motion for summary judgment was as follows:
* ↑ The 'relief demanded in the complaint' included:
* ↑ Switzerland Cheese Ass'n. involved an action for unfair competition under the federal trademark laws, 60 Stat. 427, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq. The sole claim was that defendant's actions in selling cheese labeled as 'imported Swiss cheese' which had been imported into the United States from a country other than Switzerland were illegal under the trademark laws. The defense was that 'imported Swiss cheese' had come to have an accepted meaning in the trade of Swiss cheese that had been imported from any country. The District Court found that the meaning in the trade of 'imported Swiss cheese' was an issue of fact as to which there was a genuine dispute, and therefore denied the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment.
The request for injunctive relief therefore had to await a jury trial on the facts.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Goldstein v. United States

United States Supreme Court
316 U.S. 114
Goldstein v. United States
Argued: and Submitted Feb. 6, 1942. --- Decided: April 27, 1942
Mr. Theodore Kiendl, of New York City, for petitioner Maximillian goldstein.
Mr. Osmond K. Fraenkel, of New York City, for petitioner Benjamin Schwartz.
Charles Fahy, Sol. Gen., for respondent.
Messrs. Herman Rubin and Irving Elentuch, pro se.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Frolic of the Bears

From the opera Treemonisha
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Frogs (Murray 1912)/Characters

Layout 2
CHARACTERS OF THE PLAY
The God Dionysus.
Xanthias, his slave.
Aeschylus.
Euripides.
Heracles.
Pluto.
Charon.
Aeacus, house porter to Pluto.
A Corpse.
A Maidservant of Persephone.
A Landlady in Hades
Plathane, her servant.
A Chorus of Frogs.
A Chorus of Initiated Persons.
Attendants at a Funeral; Women worshipping Iacchus, Servants of Pluto, &c.
"The play was first produced in Athens at the Feast of the Lenaea in the year 405 B.C. It obtained the first prize. Phrynichus was second with 'The Muses,' Plato third with 'The Cleophon.'"
# Frohwerk v. United States

United States Supreme Court
249 U.S. 204
Frohwerk v. United States
Argued: Jan. 27, 1919. --- Decided: March 10, 1919
Messrs. Joseph D. Shewalter, of Independence, Mo., and Frans E. Lindquist, of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff in error.
Mr. John Lord O'Brian, of Buffalo, N. Y., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 9567

more info.
See the Notes section for a listing of Executive Orders affected by or related to the issuance of this Executive Order.
Signed by President Harry S. Truman Friday, June 8, 1945
Federal Register page & date: 10 FR 6917, Tuesday, June 12, 1945
By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution, by the First War Powers Act, 1941 (50 U.S.C. App., Sup. 601 et seq.), by the Trading with the Enemy Act of October 6, 1917, as amended (50 U.S.C. App., Sup. 1 et seq.), and as President of the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:
    Section 2 (c) of Executive Order No. 9095 of March 11, 1942, as amended by Executive Order No. 9193 of July 6, 1942 (3 CFR Cum. Supp.), is amend to read as follows:
   "(c) any other property or interest within the United States of any nature whatsoever owned or controlled by, payable or deliverable to, held on behalf of or on account of, or owing to, or which is evidence of ownership or control by, a designated enemy country or national thereof:
       Provided, however, That with respect to any such property or interest shall not include cash, bullion, moneys, currencies, deposits, credits, credit instruments, foreign exchange, and securities except to the extent that the Alien Property Custodian determines that such cash, bullion, moneys, currencies, deposits, credits, credit instruments, foreign exchange, and securities are necessary for the maintenance or safeguarding of other property belonging to the same designated enemy country or the same national thereof and subject to vesting pursuant to section 2 hereof;"

## Notes

Shortcut: WS:USEO

### Amends

* Executive Order 9095, March 11, 1942

### Revoked by

* Executive Order 12553, February 25, 1986

### See Related

* Executive Order 9193, July 6, 1942
* Executive Order 9788, October 15, 1946
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 9566

more info.
See the Notes section for a listing of Executive Orders affected by or related to the issuance of this Executive Order.
Signed by President Harry S. Truman Tuesday, June 5, 1945
Federal Register page & date: 10 FR 6793, Thursday, June 7, 1945
By virtue of and pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 4 of the Air Commerce Act of 1926 (44 Stat. 570), as amended, Executive Order 9090 of March 6, 1942, establishing an airspace reservation over portions of Ulster and Dutchess Counties, New York, is hereby revoked.

## Notes

Shortcut: WS:USEO

### Revokes

* Executive Order 9090, March 6, 1942
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 956

more info.
Signed by President Theodore Roosevelt Wednesday, October 21, 1908
1908 CSR 138
Mr. Frederick Koch may be appointed disciplinarian at the Carlisle, Pa., Indian School, upon noncompetitive examination showing him to be qualified by experience for the position.
The White House,
    October 21, 1908.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 9561

more info.
See the Notes section for a listing of Executive Orders affected by or related to the issuance of this Executive Order.
Signed by President Harry S. Truman Friday, June 1, 1945
Federal Register page & date: 10 FR 6547, Tuesday, June 5, 1945
By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 10 of the act of June 16, 1942, as amended, 56 Stat. 363 (37 U.S.C. Sup. 110), it is ordered as follows:
    1. Paragraph "A. General" and Exception No. 1 of paragraph "B. Special" of Section I of Executive Order No. 9386, dated October 15, 1943, prescribing allowances for quarters and subsistence to enlisted men not furnished quarters or rations in kind, are hereby amended to provide that the daily subsistence allowance therein authorized where no Government messing facilities are furnished shall be $2.25 instead of $1.80.
    2. This order shall be effective from June 1, 1945, until June 30, 1946, unless sooner modified or revoked.

## Notes

Shortcut: WS:USEO

### Amends

* Executive Order 9386, October 15, 1943

### Amended by

* Executive Order 9744-C, June 29, 1946

### See Related

* Executive Order 9871, July 8, 1947
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 9563

more info.
See the Notes section for a listing of Executive Orders affected by or related to the issuance of this Executive Order.
Signed by President Harry S. Truman Monday, June 4, 1945
Federal Register page & date: 10 FR 6639, Wednesday, June 6, 1945
By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 9 of title 2 of the Canal Zone Code, approved June 19, 1934, Rule 46 of Executive Order No. 4314 of September 25, 1925 (35 CFR 4.48), establishing rules governing the navigation of the Panama Canal and adjacent waters, is hereby amended to read as follows:
   RULE 46. Meals to be furnished by vessel in certain cases. Pilots, extra deck hands, and other Panama Canal personnel on duty aboard a vessel during regular meal hours while the vessel is transiting the Canal, and pilots and extra deck hands on duty aboard a vessel during regular meal hours while the vessel is being shifted from one dock or berth to another, shall be furnished means by the vessel without charge:
       Provided, That if the vessel is unable to furnish such meals they may be furnished by The Panama Canal at the expense of the vessel.

## Notes

Shortcut: WS:USEO

### Amends

* Executive Order 4314, September 25, 1925
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Four Popular Songs (8)/A Cobler There Was

A COBBLER THERE WAS.
# Four Popular Songs (8)/Easter Monday

EASTER MONDAY.
# Four Popular Songs (7)/Kenmure's On and Awa

Kenmure's on AND awa;
# Four Popular Songs (7)/The German Lairdie

THE GERMAN LAIRDIE,
# Four Popular Songs (7)/What Murrian Now

What Murrian now.
# Four Popular Songs (8)/When I've Money

WHEN I'VE MONEY.
# Four Riddles

A series of four riddles in poem form.
* "A Double Acrostic" in Phantasmagoria and Other Poems (1869), only includes the first riddle
* "Four Riddles" in Rhyme? and Reason? (1883)
* "Four Riddles" in The Complete Works of Lewis Carroll (1920)
# Four Popular Songs (7)/The Miller

THE MILLER.
# Four Popular Songs (8)

FOUR POPULAR
Songs:
Viz.
EASTER MONDAY.
WHEN I'VE MONEY.
WHAT'S A WOMAN LIKE?
AND
A COBLER THERE WAS.
Falkirk—Printed by Mrs. Taylor, 1826.
* Easter Monday
* When I've Money
* What's a Woman Like?
* A Cobler There Was
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Four Popular Songs (8)/What's a Woman Like?

WHAT’S A WOMAN LIKE?
# Gabriel's Message

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Gabriel's Message."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "The angel Gabriel from heaven came": traditional Basque, tr. Sabine Baring-Gould, 18th–19th century.
* "Gabriel's message does away": lyrics by John Mason Neale, 1853; music anonymous, 13th century, harmonized by Thomas Helmore, 1853.
# Gable v. Jenkins

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
397 U.S. 592
Gable v. Jenkins
Wesley R. Asinof, for appellant.
Henry L. Bowden, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gable v. Jenkins/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
397 U.S. 592
Gable v. Jenkins
The judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gabrielle de Bergerac

* "Gabrielle de Bergerac" in The Atlantic Monthly 24 (141–143) (July-September 1869)
** "Gabrielle de Bergerac" in The Atlantic Monthly 24 (141) (July 1869): 55–71.
** "Gabrielle de Bergerac" in The Atlantic Monthly 24 (142) (August 1869): 231–241.
** "Gabrielle de Bergerac" in The Atlantic Monthly 24 (143) (September 1869): 352–361.
    — First publication in any form.
* Gabrielle de Bergerac (New York: Boni and Liveright, 1918)
    — First American book edition; published posthumously.
* "Gabrielle de Bergerac" in Eight Uncollected Tales of Henry James (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1950): ?–?.
    — Published posthumously; copyright status to be determined.
# Gabrielle de Bergerac (New York: Boni and Liveright, 1918)

GABRIELLE De BERGERAC
GABRIELLE De BERGERAC
BY HENRY JAMES
NEW YORK
BONI AND LIVERIGHT
1918
Copyright, 1918, By BONI & LIVERIGHT, Inc.
GABRIELLE De BERGERAC
* Part 1
* Part 2
* Part 3
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse