OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIV/Additional Canons 2/Canons/Canon XCVI

Canon XCVI.
Those who by baptism have put on Christ have professed that they will copy his manner of life which he led in the flesh. Those therefore who adorn and arrange their hair to the detriment of those who see them, that is by cunningly devised intertwinings, and by this means put a bait in the way of unstable souls, we take in hand to cure paternally with a suitable punishment: training them and teaching them to live soberly, in order that having laid aside the deceit and vanity of material things, they may give their minds continually to a life which is blessed and free from mischief, and have their conversation in fear, pure, [and holy]; and thus come as near as possible to God through their purity of life; and adorn the inner man rather than the outer, and that with virtues, and good and blameless manners, so that they leave in themselves no remains of the left-handedness of the adversary. But if any shall act contrary to the present canon let him be cut off.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon XCVI.
Whoever twist up their hair into artistic plaits for the destruction of the beholders are to be cut off.
For the intricate manner of dressing the hair used in the East, and for a description of the golden dye, see the scholion of Zonaras. Van Espen remarks that the curious care for somebody else’s hair in the form of wigs, so prevalent with many laymen and ecclesiastics of his day, is the same vice condemned by the canon in another shape.

## Footnotes

* ↑ These words only in the Latin.
* ↑ It is curious to note that so great was the care of the clergy for their wigs that the very shape of the vestments was changed so as not to disturb them, and the surplices were slit all the way down the front, as they continue in some places even down to our own days, after the original cause had long passed away.
# Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
388 U.S. 455
Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen v. United States
See 88 S.Ct. 15.
Harry Wilmarth, for appellants.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian, for the United States and others.
Robert H. Bierma and David L. Wilson, for appellee Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Order of Railway Conductors of America v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company

United States Supreme Court
323 U.S. 166
Order of Railway Conductors of America v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company
Argued: Nov. 15, 1944. --- Decided: Dec 11, 1944
Mr. Rufus G. Poole, of Washington, D.C., for petitioners.
Mr. John B. Prizer, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent, Pennsylvania R. Co.
Mr. Bernard M. Savage, of Baltimore, Md., for respondent Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Order of Railway Conductors of America v. Southern Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
339 U.S. 255
Order of Railway Conductors of America v. Southern Railway Company
Argued: Feb. 8-9, 1950. --- Decided: April 10, 1950
Mr. V. C. Shuttleworth, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for petitioner.
Mr. W. Scott Mcagill, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Order of Railway Conductors of America v. Swan

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
329 U.S. 520
Order of Railway Conductors of America v. Swan
Argued: Dec. 10, 11, 1946. --- Decided: Jan 13, 1947
Mr.V. C. Shuttleworth, of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for petitioners.
Mr. Anan Raymond, of Chicago, Ill., for respondent Railroad Yardmasters of America.
Mr. Douglas F. Smith, of Chicago, Ill., for respondents Carrier Members of the First and Fourth Divisions et al.
Mr. Justice MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen and Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Clinchfield Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
395 U.S. 841
ORDER OF RAILWAY CONDUCTORS AND BRAKEMEN AND BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN, petitioners, v. CLINCHFIELD RAILROAD COMPANY.
Herbert S. Thatcher, for petitioners.
Dennis G. Lyons, for respondent.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen and Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Clinchfield Railroad Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
395 U.S. 841
ORDER OF RAILWAY CONDUCTORS AND BRAKEMEN AND BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN, petitioners, v. CLINCHFIELD RAILROAD COMPANY.
Denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
388 U.S. 455
Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen v. United States
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 9/Recent shocks of earthquakes

Contributor unknown.
RECENT SHOCKS OF EARTHQUAKES.
Since the occurrence of the great earthquakes at Manilla, on the 3rd of June last, the following have been recorded:—
On the 19th of June, at noon, and an hour after, two shocks were felt at Anatolai, and the surrounding country, east of Constantinople; and on the 25th, at Rhodes, a slight shock, accompanied by subterraneous bellowings (mugissements).
At Jamaica and Spanish Town, two strong shocks are reported to have occurred recently, but no precise date is given.
On the 21st of August, at 5h. 15m. a.m., at Setif in Algeria, the earth was slightly agitated during a period of about ten seconds. On the same day at 11 p.m., a shock was felt at Palmi and at Gerace, in Calabria; and a slighter one in the same locality at 9 o’clock on the following evening.
At Mont Dore (Puy de Dôme), between September 18, 6h. 20m., p.m., and September 19, 3h. 5m., p.m., eighteen shocks were felt, five of them so strong as to terrify the population, who in consequence passed a part of the night in the streets; and between 7h. 15m., p.m. on the 19th, and 5h. 8m., p.m. on the 20th, seventeen fresh oscillations, some of which, especially those that occurred during the night of the 19th, again compelled the inhabitants to quit their houses and bivouac in the street. These phenomena were accompanied by a noise resembling the roll of distant thunder.
Concerning the slight shock we in England have lately experienced, enough—perhaps too much—has been already said. The editor of a French scientific journal remarks, “Aucun incident qui mérite d’être relevé n’est cité dans les longues correspondances des journaux anglais.”
J. C.
# Nineteen Articles (1911)

* related portals: Constitutional documents, China.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Source: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-94-015-1011-0%2F1.pdf

## Article 1

The Grand Qing Dynasty shall reign forever.

## Article 2

The person of the Emperor shall be inviolable.

## Article 3

The power of the Emperor shall be limited by the Constitution.

## Article 4

The order of succession shall be prescribed in the Constitution.

## Article 5

The Constitution shall be drawn up and adopted by the National Legislative Council and promulgated by the Emperor.

## Article 6

The power of amending the Constitution shall belong to the National Assembly.

## Article 7

The members of the Upper House shall be elected by the people from among those eligible for the position.

## Article 8

The National Assembly shall elect the Premier, whom the Emperor will then appoint. The other Cabinet ministers shall be recommended by the Premier and appointed by the Emperor. Members of the Imperial Family shall be ineligible to serve as Premier, Cabinet ministers and administrative heads of the provinces.

## Article 9

If the Premier, on being impeached by the National Assembly, does not dissolve the National Assembly, he shall resign; but one Cabinet shall not be allowed to dissolve the National Assembly more than once.

## Article 10

The Emperor shall assume direct control of the army and navy; but, when this power is used with regard to internal affairs, he must observe special conditions to be prescribed by the National Assembly.

## Article 11

Imperial decrees shall not be made to replace law; except in the event of emergency, decrees shall be issued only for the execution of law and under the authorization of law.

## Article 12

International treaties shall not be concluded without the consent of the National Assembly; but, when the National Assembly is not in session, the declaration of war and conclusion of peace may be made by the Emperor and approved by it afterwards.

## Article 13

Ordinances in connection with government administration shall be prescribed by law.

## Article 14

In case the Budget fails to receive the approval of the National Assembly, the Government shall not act upon the previous year's Budget nor may items of expenditures not provided for in the Budget be appended to it. The Government shall not be allowed to adopt extraordinary financial measures outside the Budget.

## Article 15

The National Assembly shall fix the expenses of the Imperial Household and any increase or decrease therein.

## Article 16

The grand ceremonies of the Imperial Family shall not be in conflict with the Constitution.

## Article 17

The agency for the adjudication of state affairs shall be established by the two houses.

## Article 18

The Emperor shall promulgate the decisions of the National Assembly.

## Article 19

The National Legislative Council shall act upon Articles 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 18 until the opening of the National Assembly.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Nineteen Impressions/End matter

ending two pages.
THE NOVELS OF J. D. BERESFORD
Crown 8vo, 6s. each.
THE EARLY HISTORY OF JACOB STAHL
Second Impression.
"A very remarkable book … 'Jacob Stahl' should place its writer at once in the forefront of modern novelists. … We congratulate Mr. Beresford on one of the most convincing studies of character we have read for a very long time."—Morning Post.
"A work of rare promise."—Westminster Gazette.
"Brilliantly clever."—Manchester Guardian.
A CANDIDATE FOR TRUTH
Second Impression
A continuation of the history of Jacob Stahl.
"'A Candidate for Truth' raises its author quite definitely to the front rank of living novelists."—Standard.
"Mr. Beresford has unmistakably arrived. If we were to consider Mr. Arnold Bennett as a safe first-class, we should have to place Mr. Beresford not very far below in the same class."—Morning Leader.
"The book is an excellent piece of work, well designed and well fashioned, full of observation of life."—Times.
THE INVISIBLE EVENT
The conclusion of the history of Jacob Stahl.
"The 'Invisible Event' is the story of the marriage of true minds."—Manchester Guardian.
"The morality of the whole book is at once brave and shining". … I defy anyone to read this book without feeling honester for it."—New Statesman.
"As usual Mr. Beresford has mixed brains with his writing; and the result is an admirable story."—The Globe.
"Mr. Beresford has brought his long and singularly sincere record to an end that is worthy of its beginnings, and … the trilogy forms as fine an achievement as any our modern school has produced."—The Times.
THE HAMPDENSHIRE WONDER
This book is a striking tour de force in philosophical fiction, the narrative of the short life of the "Wonder"—a boy of humble parentage—carrying the reader along through his remarkable career, and subtly propounding the question: what would life be without mystery?
"A novel which in point of originality, both of conception and execution, is the most remarkable that has been published for some time."—Morning Post.
# Nineteen Impressions/Flaws in the Time Scheme

p. 39.

### FLAWS IN THE TIME SCHEME

"There is neither time nor even succession in space."
Time and Free-will, by Henri Bergson.
* I. An Effect of Reincarnation
* II. A Case of Prevision
* III. The Late Occupier
# Nineteen Impressions

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
London: Sidgwick & Jackson, Ltd., 1918.
NINETEEN IMPRESSIONS
BY
J. D. BERESFORD
LONDON SIDGWICK & JACKSON, LTD. 1918
All rights reserved
BY THE SAME AUTHOR
NOVELS
* THE EARLY HISTORY OF JACOB STAHL )
* A CANDIDATE FOR TRUTH ) A Trilogy
* THE INVISIBLE EVENT )
* THE HOUSE IN DEMETRIUS ROAD
* THE MOUNTAINS OF THE MOON
* THESE LYNNEKERS
* HOUSEMATES
FANTASIES
THE HAMPDENSHIRE WONDER
GOSLINGS
CRITICISM
H. G. WELLS
TO MY WIFE
Contents
* page
* Introduction ix
* Cut-Throat Farm 1
* The Power o' Money 11
* The Criminal 23
* Flaws In The Time Scheme—
* I. An Effect of Reincarnation 41
* II. A Case of Prevision 51
* III. The Late Occupier 65
* The Little Town 71
* The Lost Suburb 85
* The Great Tradition 107
* The Escape 113
* Force Majeure 125
* The Contemporaries 137
* The Empty Theatre 145
* The Ashes of Last Night's Fire 157
* The Misanthrope 165
* Powers of The Air 183
* The Instrument of Destiny 195
* The Man in the Machine 207
* Lost in the Fog 215
          Advertisements
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1947, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 76 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# North American Cement Corporation v. Graves/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
299 U.S. 517
North American Cement Corporation v. Graves
Judgment affirmed upon the ground that the statute (Section 214, Article 9-A, of the Tax Law of the State of New York) is valid upon its face and it has not been shown to have been so applied as to violate appellants' constitutional rights. Bass, Ratcliff & Gretton, Ltd., v. State Tax Commission, 266 U.S. 271, 45 S.Ct. 82, 69 L.Ed. 282.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Norris v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
257 U.S. 77
Norris v. United States
No. 11 Argued: Oct. 5, 1921. --- Decided: Nov 7, 1921
NORRIS v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS.
Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims in a suit to recover the emoluments of an office accruing after appellant's removal from it. See also ante, 71, post, 82.
Mr. William E. Russell, with whom Mr. L. T. Michener and Mr. P. G. Michener were on the briefs, for appellant.
​Mr. Assistant Attorney General Riter, with whom Mr. Assistant Attorney General Davis and Mr. William D. Harris were on the brief, for the United States.
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# North America in the Ice Period

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "North America in the Ice Period."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "North America in the Ice Period" by Charles Henry Hitchcock in Popular Science Monthly, 20 (December 1881)
* "North America in the Ice Period" by John Strong Newberry in Popular Science Monthly, 30 (November 1886)
# North American Cement Corporation v. Graves

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
299 U.S. 517
North American Cement Corporation v. Graves
Mr. Charles J. Tobin, of Albany, N. Y., for appellant.
For decisions below, see 269 N.Y. 507, 199 N.E. 510; 243 App.Div. 834, 278 N.Y.S. 920.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Oregon Exchanges/Volume 7

* Number 1
* Number 2
* Number 3
* Number 4
* Number 5
* Number 6
# Oregon Exchanges/Volume 8

* Number 1
* Number 2
* Number 3
* Number 4
* Number 5
* Number 6
# Oregon Geographic Names

covers the origins of geographic names in the U.S. state of Oregon. Many component articles were published in the Oregon Historical Quarterly prior to the first book edition. Work has been carried forward by others since McArthur's death.

## Oregon Historical Quarterly entries

* (The Lakes of Oregon, vol. 26 no. 1)
* Volume 26 (1925)
** Part I
* Volume 27
** Part II
** Part III
** Part IV
** Part V
* Volume 28
** Part VI
** Part VII
** Part VIII
* (Item in vol. 37 on The Oregon State Boundary)
* Entry in vol. 43 no. 4
* Entry in vol. 44 no. 1, no. 2, no. 3, no. 4
* Entry in vol. 45 no. 1
* Entries in vol. 47 no. 1, no. 2, no. 3, no. 4
* Vol. 48
* Vol. 49
* Vol. 50
* Continued in vol. 85 no. 4 by Lewis L. McArthur (still under copyright)

## Book editions

* Oregon Geographic Names (self-published, 1928) no copyright renewal
* Oregon Geographic Names (second edition, 1944) no copyright renewal
* Oregon Geographic Names (third edition, 1952) Binfords & Mort. (transcription project)
# Oregon Historical Quarterly/Volume 7/Jason Lee memorial address by J. C. Moreland

ADDRESS
By Hon. J. C. Moreland.
In accordance with the directions of the Oregon Pioneer Society, expressed at its meeting a year ago, we have met here in the city that he founded to pay tribute to the memory of Oregon's first and greatest American pioneer, Jason Lee. He came solely as a missionary to the Indians. He soon saw the possibilities and the vast resources and the great value of this country.
He soon saw that when the final settlement of the ownership of this country between this Nation and Great Britain then held under the treaty of joint occupation should come, that ownership would largely be determined by the citizenship of its settlers.
The work that he did to colonize the country with American citizens under the trying difficulties of the situation proved of incalculable value. In arousing the authorities at Washington to the value of the Oregon Country his work and the information that he gave contributed in a large measure to the final happy result.
Jason Lee was a remarkable man—of great determination and wonderful foresight, but like others of the great benefactors of his race, he was not understood in his time. Through ignorance of the situation, his church dismissed him from the control of its affairs here, most unjustly and cruelly. But he could safely trust his appeal to that unerring tribunal—truth and time.
His vindication has come—the church has acknowledged its mistake, and to-day his bones will be laid in final sepulture in the cemetery he selected seventy years ago, with all the honors that the church can bestow, and all people in this great Oregon Country pay homage to his memory.
​In the time that tried men's souls he was true and faithful, and the impartial verdict of history will be that of all those who lie buried in this fair land "none had greater glory though there be many dead and much glory."
# Penn General Casualty Company v. Pennsylvania ex rel. Schnader

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
294 U.S. 189
Penn General Casualty Company v. Pennsylvania ex rel. Schnader
Argued: Jan. 11-14, 1935. --- Decided: Feb 4, 1935
Messrs. Joseph W. Henderson and Thomas F. Mount, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.
Mr. Wm. A. Schnader, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Lederer

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
252 U.S. 523
Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Lederer
Argued: March 22 and 23, 1920. --- Decided: April 19, 1920
Mr. George Wharton Pepper, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Frierson, for respondent.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Penn National Bank v. Furness

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
114 U.S. 376
Penn National Bank v. Furness
N. H. Sharpless, for appellant.
Charles Hart and Samuel Dickson, for appellees.
FIELD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Penn Dairies v. Milk Control Commission of Pennsylvania

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    O. Douglas
United States Supreme Court
318 U.S. 261
Penn Dairies v. Milk Control Commission of Pennsylvania
Argued: Jan. 13, 1943. --- Decided: March 1, 1943
Mr. Harris C. Arnold, of Lancaster, Pa., for appellant Penn Dairies, inc.
Mr. Charles Fahy, of Washington, D.C., Sol. Gen., for appellant the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 262-264 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Frank E. Coho, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from Page 265 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse