OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/6th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 25

Chap. XXV.—An Act to amend the act altering the district of Bermuda Hundred and City Point.
Alterations in the districts. 1800, ch. 49.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the passing of this act, the master or commander of any ship or vessel arriving within the districts of Petersburg or Richmond, laden with goods, wares and merchandise, belonging or consigned to persons resident within both ​the said districts, shall make entry of such ship or vessel, in manner already prescribed by law, with the collector of that district wherein the owner or consignee, or the husband or acting manager of such ship or vessel, shall actually reside: and the said master or commander shall, at the time of making the entry aforesaid, deliver a duplicate manifest of the cargo as now required by law, to the said collector, whose duty it shall then be, to certify the same as a true copy, and to transmit it to the collector of the other district, and the delivery of such goods, wares or merchandise, shall be authorized by permits from the collector of each district respectively, in which the same shall have been duly entered according to law: Provided, that no bona fide importer, owner or consignee of goods, wares or merchandise, residing in either district, shall be admitted to make an entry of such goods, wares or merchandise with the collector of the district, in which such an importer, owner or consignee shall not reside: And provided also, that all entries for goods, wares or merchandise, made by agents, for persons residing in other districts, shall be made with the collector of the district in which such ship or vessel may discharge.
Approved, March 3, 1801.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/6th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 26

Chap. XXVI.—An Act authorizing the remission of duties on certain Teas destroyed by fire, while under the care of the officers of the customs, in Providence, Rhode Island.
Duties on goods destroyed by fire remitted.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the collector of the district of Providence, in the state of Rhode Island, be, and he is hereby authorized and directed to remit the duties on such part of a certain quantity of teas, imported into the port of Providence, in the ship called the Resource, on the twenty-ninth day of July, one thousand eight hundred, by Thomas Lloyd Halsey, John Corlis, William F. Megee, and Henry Smith, of the town of Providence, merchants, and on such part of a certain quantity of teas, imported into the said port, in the ship called the Ann and Hope, on the twenty-second day of August, in the same year, by John Innes Clark, of the said town, merchant, as remained deposited to secure the payment of duties, under the care of the officers of the customs, on the twenty-first day of January last, in the aforesaid town of Providence, and shall be proved, to the satisfaction of the said collector, to have been burned and destroyed.
Approved, March 3, 1801.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/6th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 21

Chap. XXI.—An Act concerning the Mint.
To remain at Philadelphia. Act of March 3, 1803, ch. 36. Act of April 1, 1808, ch. 41.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the mint shall remain in the city of Philadelphia, until the fourth day of March, in the year one thousand eight hundred and three.
Act of Dec. 2, 1812, ch. 2. Act of March 3, 1823, ch. 42. Certain duties to be performed by the district judge and attorney of Pennsylvania and the commissioner of loans.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That during the continuance of the mint at the city of Philadelphia, the duties now enjoined on the Chief Justice of the United States, the Secretary and Comptroller of the Treasury, the Secretary for the Department of State, and the Attorney General of the United States, by the eighteenth section of the act, intituled “An Act establishing a mint, and regulating the coins of the United States,” passed the second day of April, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-two, shall be performed by the district judge of Pennsylvania, the attorney for the United States in the district of Pennsylvania, and the commissioner of loans for the state of Pennsylvania.
Approved, March 3, 1801.
# Trent's Trust and Other Stories

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
1903
* Trent's Trust
* Mr. Macglowrie's Widow
* A Ward of Colonel Starbottle
* Prosper's "Old Mother"
* The Convalescence of Jack Hamlin
* A Pupil of Chestnut Ridge
* Dick Boyle's Business Card
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Trevor

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Trevor."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Trevor, John Hampden-
* Trevor, Robert Hampden-
# Tri-City Broadcasting Company v. Bowers

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
361 U.S. 97
Tri-City Broadcasting Company v. Bowers
Messrs. Carlton S. Dargusch, Carlton S. Dargusch, Jr., and Jack H. Bertsch, for appellant.
Messrs. Mark McElroy, Atty. Gen. of Ohio, and Joseph D. Karam, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Trenton Evening Times

* related portals: Newspapers.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
newspaper in Trenton, New Jersey
* Aviator Walsh falls 2,000 feet at Fair Grounds, October 3, 1912
* Aviator Walsh in Buried: Honored by Many Friends, ??
# Trespassers in Parks Act 1235

* related portals: England.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Part of the Statute of Merton
PROVISIONES DE MERTON. Statutes made at Merton in Crastino Sancti Vincentii (scil. 23. Jan.) Anno 20 HEN. III. and Ann. Dom. 1235.
Trespassers in Parks Act 1235
1235 (20 Hen. 3) C A P. XI.
IT was provided in the Court of our Lord the King, holden at Merton on Wednesday the morrow after the Feast of St. Vincent, the 20th Year of the Reign of King HENRY the Son of King JOHN, before William * Archbishop of Canterbury, and other his Bishops and Suffragans, and before the greater part of the Earls and Barons of England, there being assembled for the Coronation of the said King, and Hellianor the Queen, about which they were all called, where it was treated for the Commonwealth of the Realm upon the Articles underwritten, thus it was provided and granted, as well of the foresaid Archbishops, Bishops, Earls, and Barons, as of the King himself and others."
Lords shall not imprison Offenders at their own Wills for Trespasses in their Parks and Ponds.
Concerning Trespasses in Parks and Ponds it is not yet discussed; for the Lords demanded the proper Imprisonment of such as they should take in their Parks and Ponds, which the King denied; whereof it was deferred.'
2 Inst. 100.
By 3 Ed. 1. c. 20. Malefactors in Parks and Ponds may be punished by three Years Imprisonment. By 21 Ed. 1. stat. 2. Malefactors in Forests, Parks, &c. may be killed, if they will not stand to the King's Peace. By 1 H. 7. c. 7. bunting in disguise in Parks is Felony. 3 W. & M. c. 10. § 5. extends the Law against Deer-stealers to inclosed Grounds where Deer are kept. And 4 & 5 W.& M. c. 28. § 4. to Lords of Manors and Game-keepers, who may appose Persons in the Night.
Note : this act is listed in the Chronological Table of Statutes as the Trespassers in Parks Act, 1235
This work is in the public domain worldwide because it was created by a public body of the United Kingdom with Crown Status and commercially published before 1974.
See Crown copyright artistic works, Crown copyright non-artistic works and List of Public Bodies with Crown Status.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Trezza v. Brush

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
142 U.S. 160
Trezza v. Brush
J. D. Bell, for appellant.
Chas. F. Tabor, Atty. Gen. of New York, for appellee.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Trezza v. Brush/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
142 U.S. 160
Trezza v. Brush
Trezza was convicted of murder in the first degree in the court of sessions of Kings county, N. Y., June 6, 1890, and sentenced to death. The warrant for the execution of the judgment and sentence was duly issued to the agent and warden of the state-prison at Sing Sing, and under it Trezza was committed to his custody. An appeal was taken to the court of appeals, and the judgment affirmed, (125 N. Y. 740, 26 N. E. Rep. 933;) whereupon, March 6, 1891, the court of sessions ordered the judgment of conviction and sentence of death to be executed and enforced in the manner provided by law, and issued a second warrant to the warden. Trezza then presented his petition for a writ of habeas corpus to the judge of the circuit court of the United States for the southern district of New York, and brings the order of that court denying its prayer to this court on appeal. Petitioner claimed that by his imprisonment under the first warrant he had been once punished for the offense for which he had been convicted, and that solitary confinement amounted to cruel and unusual punishment, and hence that he was restrained in violation of the fifth and eighth amendments to the constitution of the United States; and he objected, also, that the warrant was not sufficiently definite and specific. The record has not been printed, nor have briefs been filed on either side, and appellant was not represented by counsel when the cause came on for hearing. We have, however, carefully examined the transcript, and find no ground upon which to arrive at a different conclusion from that just announced in the Case of McElvaine, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 156. The judgment is affirmed, and the mandate ordered to issue at once.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Trenton Evening Times/Aviator Walsh is Buried: Honored by Many Friends

Trenton Evening Times; Trenton, New Jersey
In a grave at the Catholic cemetery, beside that of his mother, sleeps Charles F. Walsh, aviator. Funeral services were held yesterday at Our Lady of the Angels church. Boyhood friends of the dead birdman were there to pay their respects to his memory. Noted aviators from far and near sent floral offerings and messages of sympathy. It was fitting that Aviator Walsh should be buried here. It was in San Diego that much of his life was passed, it was here that he made his first flight in an aeroplane. So when he was crushed to death, after a terrible 2000-foot fall at Trenton, New Jersey, last week, they picked him up tenderly and sent him home to rest. Walsh's career was a short as it was eventful. Not until 1909 did he become interested in aviation. His first practice flights were watched with interest by his San Diego friends. And when he became one of the greatest birdmen the world has so far known, San Diego was proud of him. But there were those in San Diego who also feared for him. One of the great pilots of sky craft, and realized that Walsh, as daring as the best, might soon join the ranks of those who had gone before. It came at last. His life went out with one last, great flight in far away New Jersey.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen Ocean Lodge No. 76

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
323 U.S. 210
Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen Ocean Lodge No. 76
Argued: Nov. 14, 1944. --- Decided: Dec 18, 1944
Mr. Charles H. Houston, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. James G. Martin, of Norfolk, Va., for respondent Norfolk Southern ry. co.
Mr. Harold C. Heiss, of Cleveland, Ohio, for respondents Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen et al.
Mr. Chief Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tumbleweeds

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Tumbleweeds."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Tumbleweeds (1901), a poetry collection by William Reed Hopper Dunroy
* Tumbleweeds (1925), a silent Western film by King Baggot, starring William S. Hart
* Tumbleweeds (1926), a poetry collection by Margarette Ball Dickson

## See also

* Tumbleweed
# Tumey v. Ohio

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
273 U.S. 510
Tumey v. Ohio
Argued: Nov. 29, 30, 1926. --- Decided: March 7, 1927
Messrs. Edward P. Moulinier, James L. Magrish, and Harry H. Shafer, all of Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 511-512 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Wayne B. Wheeler and Edward Dunford, both of Washington, D. C., for the State of Ohio.
[Argument of Counsel from page 513 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tupahn--the Thunderstorm

Extracted from Adventure Magazine, May 1922, pp. 03-47. Accompanying illustrations may be omitted. [A "Pedro and Lourenço" adventure story]
TUPAHN—the THUNDERSTORM
A Complete Novelette
by Arthur O. Friel
Author of “The Jararaca,” “Black Hawk,” etc.
* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
* Chapter VII
* Chapter VIII
* Chapter IX
* Chapter X
* Chapter XI
* Chapter XII
* Chapter XIII
* Chapter XIV
“Tupahn—The Thunderstorm,” copyright, 1922, by Arthur O. Friel.
    Copyright, 1922, by the Ridgway Company in the United States and Great Britain. All rights reserved.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1959, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 64 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Jeffers

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
342 U.S. 48
United States v. Jeffers
Argued: Oct. 15, 1951. --- Decided: Nov 13, 1951
Beatrice Rosenberg, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. T. Emmett McKenzie, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
291 U.S. 386
United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Company
Argued: Dec. 15, 1933. --- Decided: Feb 12, 1934
[Syllabus from pages 386-388 intentionally omitted]
The Attorney General and Mr. Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States, Robert O. Eaton, and C. F. Routzahn.
Messrs. David S. Day, of Bridgeport, Conn., Chester I. Long, of Wichita, Kan., and Peter Q. Nyce, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner American Chain Co.
Mr. Newton K. Fox, of Washington, D.C., for respondent Jefferson Electric Mfg. Co.
Mr. Charles C. Norris, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent Willard Storage Battery Co.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. John Barth Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
279 U.S. 370
United States v. John Barth Company
Argued: April 18, 1929. --- Decided: May 13, 1929
The Attorney General and Mrs. Mabel Walker Willebrandt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.
Messrs. Louis Quarles, of Milwaukee, Wis., and Walter H. Moses, of Chicago, Ill., for respondents.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Jin Fuey Moy

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
241 U.S. 394
United States v. Jin Fuey Moy
Argued: December 7, 1915. --- Decided: June 5, 1916
Assistant Attorney General Wallace and Mr. W. C. Herron for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 395-396 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. H. Ralph Burton, Levi Cooke, George X. McLanahan, and William Strite McDowell for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 397-399 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Joe Freeman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
239 U.S. 117
United States v. Joe Freeman
Argued: October 21, 1915. --- Decided: November 15, 1915
Assistant Attorney General Warren for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 117-119 intentionally omitted]
No appearance for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Van Devanter delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States ex rel. Kassin v. Mulligan

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
295 U.S. 396
United States ex rel. Kassin v. Mulligan
Argued: April 2, 1935. --- Decided: May 13, 1935
Mr. David P. Siegel, of New York City, for petitioner.
The Attorney General and Angus D. MacLean, Asst. Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for respondents.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States ex rel. Jennings v. Ragen

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
358 U.S. 276
United States ex rel. Jennings v. Ragen
Talbot Jennings, pro se.
Mr. Latham Castle, Atty. Gen. of Illinois, for respondent.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States ex rel. Holzendorf v. Hay

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
194 U.S. 373
United States ex rel. Holzendorf v. Hay
Argued: and submitted April 12, 13, 1904. --- Decided: May 16, 1904
The relator, plaintiff in error, filed his petition in the Supreme Court of the District ofColumbia, praying a writ of mandamus directed to the then and present Secretary of State of the United States. In substance it was averred that Holzendorf, prior to and since May, 1898, had been a naturalized citizen of the United States, and while on a visit to Germany, his native country, he was wrongfully imprisoned in an asylum for the insane at Dalldorf, near Berlin, from May 11, 1898, to July 8, 1899, when he was released by the judgment of a German court, as being 'perfectly sound in mind and body.' The grievance complained of was alleged to have been the act of the German Empire, and it was averred that said grievance 'was manifestly in contempt of his rights as a citizen of the United States,' which 'oppressively deprived him of liberty, reputation, and time, greatly to his cost, loss, damage, and injury.' Alleging a refusal by the defendant in mandamus 'to proceed, on the part of the United States, to seek to obtain redress of grievance in behalf of your petitioner,' it was prayed that a writ of mandamus issue, 'addressed to said defendant, John Hay, the Secretary aforesaid, commanding and requiring him forthwith to institute vigorous and proper proceedings against the Empire of Germany, or Kingdom of Prussia, or both, that is to say, against the Emperor, for the recovery of $500,000 damages, in behalf of your petitioner.'
The matter was heard, and an order was entered, dismissing the petition. An appeal was allowed, and the court of appeals of the District affirmed the judgment. 20 App. D. C. 576. By writ of error the cause was then brought to this court.
Messrs. R. S. Tharin and A. E. L. Leckie for plaintiff in error.
Assistant Attorney General McReynolds for defendant in error.
Statement by Mr. Justice White:
Mr. Justice White, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse