OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Texas v. New Mexico (344 U.S. 906)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
344 U.S. 906
STATE OF TEXAS, plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEW MEXICO et al.
No. 9, Original.
Messrs. Price Daniel, Attorney General of Texas, Jesse P. Luton, Jr. and K. B. Watson, Assistant Attorneys General, and Eugene T. Edwards, for plaintiff.
Messrs. Joe L. Martinez, Attorney General, and Fred E. Wilson, Special Assistant Attorney General, for the State of New Mexico.
Messrs. Martin A. Threet, D. A. Macpherson, Jr. and Jean S. Breitenstein, for defendants Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District et al.
It is ordered that John Raeburn Green, Esquire, of St. Louis, Missouri, be, and he is hereby, appointed special master in this cause, with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The master is directed to hold hearings, take such evidence as may be necessary and, with all convenient speed, to submit a report with recommendations relative to the disposition of the questions raised by the pleadings.
The order entered herein on April 28, 1952, 343 U.S. 932, 72 S.Ct. 767, left open the question of the indispensability of the United States as a party for decision after evidence. In hearing the evidence, the master is directed, so far as is practicable, to hear first evidence bearing on the indispensability of the United States, if the United States does not enter its appearance in the case. He is requested to examine and report on that point, if practicable, separately and prior to his report on the other issues, determining particularly whether effective relief could be granted petitioner without affecting the interest of the United States. The master shall give like consideration to any other allegation of indispensability made by any party defendant.
The master shall be allowed his actual expenses and a reasonable compensation for his services to be fixed hereafter by the Court. The allowances to him, the compensation paid to his stenographic and clerical assistants, and the cost of printing his report shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court hereafter may direct. If the appointment herein made of a master is not accepted, or if the place becomes vacant during the recess of the Court, the Chief Justice shall have authority to make a new designation which shall have the same effect as if originally made by the Court herein.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Texas v. New Mexico (344 U.S. 906)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
344 U.S. 906
STATE OF TEXAS, plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEW MEXICO et al.
No. 9, Original.
The CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice BLACK are of the opinion that the present record establishes the indispensability of the United States and requires the dismissal of the complaint.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Texas v. Pennsylvania et al.

FRIDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2020
ORDER IN PENDING CASE
| 155, ORIG. | Texas v. Pennsylvania, et al. The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot. Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins: In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___ (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue. |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Texas v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Texas v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Texas v. United States (292 U.S. 522)
* Texas v. United States (384 U.S. 155)
See also United States v. Texas.
# Texas v. United States (384 U.S. 155)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
384 U.S. 155
Texas v. United States (384 U.S. 155)
Waggoner Carr, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and Mary K. Wall, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Solicitor General Marshall, for the United States.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Texas v. United States (292 U.S. 522)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
292 U.S. 522
Texas v. United States
Argued: May 9, 1934. --- Decided: June 4, 1934
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri.
[Syllabus from 523 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. A. R. Stout and James V. Allred, both of Austin, Tex., for appellants.
The Attorney General and Harold M. Stephens, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
Mr. Samuel W. Moore, of New York City, for appellees Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. and Texarkana & F.S. Ry. Co.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Texas Company v. Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
281 U.S. 548
Texas Company v. Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks
Argued: May 1, 2, 1930. --- Decided: May 26, 1930
[Syllabus from pages 548-550 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. J. H. Tallichet and H. M. Garwood, both of Houston, Tex., for petitioners.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 551-553 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. John H. Crooker, of Houston, Tex., and Donald R. Richberg, of Chicago, Ill., for respondents.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Texas Company v. Northside Belt Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
276 U.S. 475
Texas Company v. Northside Belt Railway Company
Argued: Feb. 28, 1928. --- Decided: April 9, 1928
Messrs. J. H. Tallichet and H. M. Garwood, both of Houston, Tex., for petitioner.
Mr. John Walsh, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from page 476 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Texas Consolidated Theatres v. Pittman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
305 U.S. 3
Texas Consolidated Theatres v. Pittman
Argued: Oct. 19, 1938. --- Decided: Nov 7, 1938
Messrs. W. B. Handley and Jos. W. Bailey, Jr., both of Dallas, Tex., for petitioner.
No appearance or brief for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Texas Consolidated Theatres v. Pittman/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
305 U.S. 3
Texas Consolidated Theatres v. Pittman
Argued: Oct. 19, 1938. --- Decided: Nov 7, 1938
Respondent recovered judgment for damages in an action for injuries suffered by his wife. After appeal had been argued and while it was under advisement in the Circuit Court of Appeals, the parties entered into a stipulation for settlement on payment of a sum less than the judgment and providing that the judgment should be reversed and judgment entered in the District Court for costs only. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment. 5 Cir., 93 F.2d 21. Alleging that the court had been informed of the compromise and stipulation, petitioner sought a rehearing, which was denied. 5 Cir., 94 F.2d 203. We granted certiorari. 304 U.S. 556, 58 S.Ct. 1046, 82 L.Ed. 1524, May 23, 1938.
Upon the case being called for argument in this Court, respondent did not appear. Petitioner submitted a statement showing that, since the issue of the writ, an order upon hearing had been entered in the District Court whereby the judgment involved was decreed to be satisfied and discharged in full and the issue of execution thereon was prohibited; that respondent excepted to the order and gave notice of appeal but that the appeal had not been prosecuted.
Petitioner submitted the case for such order as the Court may deem proper and suggested that the costs of this proceeding may be taxed against it.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed with costs against petitioner. It is so ordered.
Certiorari dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Texas Company v. Hogarth Shipping Corporation

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
256 U.S. 619
Texas Company v. Hogarth Shipping Corporation
Argued: Jan. 26 and 27, 1921. --- Decided: June 6, 1921
Mr. John W. Griffin, of New York City, for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 620-625 intentionally omitted]
Mr. John M. Woolsey, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Texas Company v. Brown

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
258 U.S. 466
Texas Company v. Brown
Argued: October 13 and 14, 1921. --- Decided: April 17, 1922
Messrs. John M. Slaton, of Atlanta, Ga., and Harry T. Klein, of New York City, for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 467-469 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Mark Bolding, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellees.
Mr. Justice PITNEY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# The Alabama and the Game-Cock

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
92 U.S. 695
The Alabama and the Game-Cock
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
The case was argued by Mr. Edwards Pierrepont for the 'Alabama,' by Mr. W. R. Beebe for the 'Game-cock,' and by Mr. John E. Parsons for the libellant.
MR JUSTICE BRADLEY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# The Airman's Creed

Introduced on 18 April 2007. Replaces all existing Air Force-related creeds.
* I am an American Airman.
* I am a warrior.
* I have answered my nation’s call.
* I am an American Airman.
* My mission is to fly, fight, and win.
* I am faithful to a proud heritage,
* A tradition of honor,
* And a legacy of valor.
* I am an American Airman,
* Guardian of freedom and justice,
* My nation’s sword and shield,
* Its sentry and avenger.
* I defend my country with my life.
* I am an American Airman:
* Wingman, leader, warrior.
* I will never leave an Airman behind,
* I will never falter,
* And I will not fail.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tales from Shakspeare

* related portals: Elizabethan drama.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, quotes, Wikidata item.
A children's book, first published in 1807. It retells, in language accessible to children, the stories of twenty of Shakespeare's plays. Mary Lamb was not acknowledged as co-author until the 7th edition.
* Tales from Shakspeare, 5th ed. (1831) (transcription project)
* Tales from Shakspere (1844) in two volumes (external scans (multiple parts): 1, 2)
* Tales from Shakspeare (1901) (start transcription)
* Tales from Shakespeare (1908), illustrated by Arthur Rackham (transcription project)
* Tales from Shakespeare, (~1910s) (external scan)
# The Adventure of the Copper Beeches

* related portals: Mystery.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
* "The Adventure of the Copper Beeches", as originally published in The Strand Magazine (1891)
* "The Adventure of the Copper Beeches", as collected in The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes (1892)
# The Adventure of the Creeping Man

* related portals: Mystery.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
* "The Adventure of the Creeping Man" in The Strand Magazine with illustrations by Howard Elcock (March 1923)
* "The Adventure of the Creeping Man" in The Case Book of Sherlock Holmes (1927)
# The Adventure of the Engineer's Thumb

* related portals: Mystery.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
* "The Adventure of the Engineer's Thumb", as originally published in The Strand Magazine (1891)
* "The Adventure of the Engineer's Thumb", as collected in The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes (1892)
# The Adventure of the Crooked Man

* "The Adventure of the Crooked Man", as originally published in The Strand Magazine (July 1893)
* "The Crooked Man" in Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes
# The Adventure of the Empty House

* "The Adventure of the Empty House" in The Strand Magazine with illustrations by Sidney Paget (1903)
* "The Adventure of the Empty House" in The Return of Sherlock Holmes (1905)
# The Adventure of the Final Problem

* "The Adventure of the Final Problem", as originally published in The Strand Magazine (December 1893)
* "The Final Problem" in Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes
# The Annotated "Ulysses"/Page 078

to have hats modelled on our heads. They were about him here and there, with heads still bowed in their crimson halters, waiting for it to melt in their stomachs. Something like those mazzoth : it’s that sort of bread : unleavened shewbread. Look at them. Now I bet it makes them feel happy. Lollipop. It does. Yes, bread of angels it’s called. There’s a big idea behind it, kind of kingdom of God is within you feel. First communicants. Hokypoky penny a lump. Then feel all like one family party, same in the theatre, all in the same swim. They do. I’m sure of that. Not so lonely. In our confraternity. Then come out a bit spreeish. Let off steam. Thing is if you really believe in it. Lourdes cure, waters of oblivion, and the Knock apparition, statues bleeding. Old fellow asleep near that confession box. Hence those snores. Blind faith. Safe in the arms of kingdom come. Lulls all pain. Wake this time next year.
He saw the priest stow the communion cup away, well in, and kneel an instant before it, showing a large grey bootsole from under the lace affair he had on. Suppose he lost the pin of his. He wouldn’t know what to do to. Bald spot behind. Letters on his back I. N. R. I.? No : I. H. S. Molly told me one time I asked her. I have sinned : or no : I have suffered, it is. And the other one? Iron nails ran in.
Meet one Sunday after the rosary. Do not deny my request. Turn up with a veil and black bag. Dusk and the light behind her. She might be here with a ribbon round her neck and do the other thing all the same on the sly. Their character. That fellow that turned queen’s evidence on the invincibles he used to receive the, Carey was his name, the communion every morning. This very church. Peter Carey. No, Peter Claver I am thinking of. Denis Carey. And just imagine that. Wife and six children at home. And plotting that murder all the time. Those crawthumpers, now that’s a good name for them, there’s always something shiftylooking about them. They’re not straight men of business either. O no she’s not here : the flower : no, no. By the way did I tear up that envelope? Yes : under the bridge.
The priest was rinsing out the chalice : then he tossed off the dregs smartly. Wine. Makes it more aristocratic than for example if he drank what they are used to Guinness’s porter or some temperance beverage Wheatley’s Dublin hop bitters or Cantrell and Cochrane’s ginger ale (aromatic). Doesn’t give them any of it : show wine : only the other. Cold comfort. Pious fraud but quite right : otherwise they’d have one old booser worse than another coming along, cadging for a drink. Queer the whole atmosphere of the. Quite right. Perfectly right that is.
# The Annotated "Ulysses"/Page 079

Mr Bloom looked back towards the choir. Not going to be any music. Pity. Who has the organ here I wonder? Old Glynn he knew how to make that instrument talk, the vibrato : fifty pounds a year they say he had in Gar- diner street. Molly was in fine voice that day, the Stabat Mater of Rossini. Father Bernard Vaughan’s sermon first. Christ or Pilate? Christ, but don’t keep us all night over it. Music they wanted. Footdrill stopped. Could hear a pin drop. I told her to pitch her voice against that corner. I could feel the thrill in the air, the full, the people looking up :
Quis est homo!
Some of that old sacred music is splendid. Mercadante : seven last words. Mozart’s twelfth mass : the Gloria in that. Those old popes were keen on music, on art and statues and pictures of all kinds. Palestrina for example too. They had a gay old time while it lasted. Healthy too chanting, regular hours, then brew liqueurs. Benedictine. Green Chartreuse. Still, having eunuchs in their choir that was coming it a bit thick. What kind of voice is it? Must be curious to hear after their own strong basses. Connoisseurs. Suppose they wouldn’t feel anything after. Kind of a placid. No worry. Fall into flesh don’t they? Gluttons, tall, long legs. Who knows? Eunuch. One way out of it.
He saw the priest bend down and kiss the altar and then face about and bless all the people. All crossed themselves and stood up. Mr Bloom glanced about him and then stood up, looking over the risen hats. Stand up at the gospel of course. Then all settled down on their knees again and he sat back quietly in his bench. The priest came down from the altar, holding the thing out from him, and he and the massboy answered each other in Latin. Then the priest knelt down and began to read off a card :
— O God, our refuge and our strength…
Mr Bloom put his face forward to catch the words. English. Throw them the bone. I remember slightly. How long since your last mass? Gloria and immaculate virgin Joseph her spouse. Peter and Paul. More interesting if you understood what it was all about. Wonderful organisation certainly, goes like clockwork. Confession. Everyone wants to. Then I will tell you all. Penance. Punish me, please. Great weapon in their hands. More than doctor or solicitor. Woman dying to. And I schschschschschsch. And did you chachachachacha? And why did you? Look down at her ring to find an excuse. Whispering gallery walls have ears. Husband learn to his surprise. God’s little joke. Then out she comes. Repentance skindeep. Lovely shame. Pray at an altar.
# The Annotated "Ulysses"/Page 085

Other hoofs and creaking wheels started behind. The blinds of the avenue passed and number ten with its craped knocker, door ajar. At walking pace.
They waited still, their knees jogging, till they had turned and were passing along the tramtracks. Tritonville road. Quicker. The wheels rattled rolling over the cobbled causeway and the crazy glasses shook rattling in the doorframes.
— What way is he taking us? Mr Power asked through both windows.
— Irishtown, Martin Cunningham said. Ringsend. Brunswick street.
Mr Dedalus nodded, looking out.
— That’s a fine old custom, he said. I am glad to see it has not died out.
All watched awhile through their windows caps and hats lifted by passers. Respect. The carriage swerved from the tramtrack to the smoother road past Watery lane. Mr Bloom at gaze saw a lithe young man, clad in mourning, a wide hat.
— There’s a friend of yours gone by, Dedalus, he said.
— Who is that?
— Your son and heir.
— Where is he? Mr Dedalus said, stretching over, across.
The carriage, passing the open drains and mounds of rippedup roadway before the tenement houses, lurched round the corner and, swerving back to the tramtrack, rolled on noisily with chattering wheels. Mr Dedalus fell back, saying :
— Was that Mulligan cad with him? His fidus Achates!
— No, Mr Bloom said. He was alone.
— Down with his aunt Sally, I suppose, Mr Dedalus said, the Goulding faction, the drunken little costdrawer and Crissie, papa’s little lump of dung, the wise child that knows her own father.
Mr Bloom smiled joylessly on Ringsend road. Wallace Bros the bottle- works. Dodder bridge.
Richie Goulding and the legal bag. Goulding, Collis and Ward he calls the firm. His jokes are getting a bit damp. Great card he was. Waltzing in Stamer street with Ignatius Gallaher on a Sunday morning, the landlady’s two hats pinned on his head. Out on the rampage all night. Beginning to tell on him now : that backache of his, I fear. Wife ironing his back. Thinks he’ll cure it with pills. All breadcrumbs they are. About six hundred per cent profit.
— He’s in with a lowdown crowd, Mr Dedalus snarled. That Mulligan is a contaminated bloody doubledyed ruffian by all accounts. His name stinks all