OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# American Rescue Plan Fact Sheet: Impact on Idaho

Published March 2021
The American Rescue Plan: Impacts on Idaho
The Need for Action in Idaho
The pandemic and the associated economic crisis have had a severe impact on Idaho. The need for action is clear:
* Since the pandemic began, more than 172,000 people have been infected with COVID-19 and more than 1,800 people have died.
* The unemployment rate is 3.8%, up from 2.6% before the pandemic.
* Since February 2020, more than 853 fewer people are employed.
* 99,000 adults – 8% of all adults in the state – report not having enough food to eat. This includes 48,000 adults living with children, or 11% of all adults living with children, who report that the children in their household do not have enough to eat.
* An estimated 42,000 renters or 13% of renters are not caught up on rent.
* An estimated 389,000 adults or 30% of all adults statewide report having difficulty covering normal household expenses.
The Effect of the American Rescue Plan on Idaho
President Biden’s American Rescue Plan will provide Idaho with:
* $1.3 billion in state fiscal relief
* $600 million in local fiscal relief
* More than $455 million in relief for K-12 schools
* Economic impact payments of up to $1,400 per person (above the $600 per person provided in December) for more than 1.1 million adults and 521,000 children. This is 91% of all adults in the state and 90% of all children in the state.
* Additional relief of up to $1,600 per child through the Child Tax Credit to the families of 410,000 children, lifting 17,000 children out of poverty
* Additional relief of up to nearly $1,000 through the Earned Income Tax Credit to 109,000 childless workers, including many in frontline jobs
* Marketplace health insurance premiums that are $1,571 lower per month for a 60-year old couple earning $75,000 per year
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# American Rescue Plan Fact Sheet: Impact on Indiana

Published March 2021
The American Rescue Plan: Impacts on Indiana
The Need for Action in Indiana
The pandemic and the associated economic crisis have had a severe impact on Indiana. The need for action is clear:
* Since the pandemic began, more than 667,000 people have been infected with COVID-19 and more than 12,700 people have died.
* The unemployment rate is 4.6%, up from 3.2% before the pandemic.
* Since February 2020, more than 60,500 fewer people are employed.
* 493,000 adults – 11% of all adults in the state – report not having enough food to eat. This includes 225,000 adults living with children, or 14% of all adults living with children, who report that the children in their household do not have enough to eat.
* An estimated 237,000 renters or 19% of renters are not caught up on rent.
* An estimated 1.7 million adults or 36% of all adults statewide report having difficulty covering normal household expenses.
The Effect of the American Rescue Plan on Indiana
President Biden’s American Rescue Plan will provide Indiana with:
* $3.2 billion in state fiscal relief
* $2.5 billion in local fiscal relief
* More than $2 billion in relief for K-12 schools
* Economic impact payments of up to $1,400 per person (above the $600 per person provided in December) for more than 4.3 million adults and 1.7 million children. This is 91% of all adults in the state and 89% of all children in the state.
* Additional relief of up to $1,600 per child through the Child Tax Credit to the families of 1.5 million children, lifting 80,000 children out of poverty
* Additional relief of up to nearly $1,000 through the Earned Income Tax Credit to 383,000 childless workers, including many in frontline jobs
* Marketplace health insurance premiums that are $1,260 lower per month for a 60-year old couple earning $75,000 per year
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# American Rescue Plan Fact Sheet: Impact on Kansas

Published March 2021
The American Rescue Plan: Impacts on Kansas
The Need for Action in Kansas
The pandemic and the associated economic crisis have had a severe impact on Kansas. The need for action is clear:
* Since the pandemic began, more than 295,800 people have been infected with COVID-19 and more than 4,800 people have died.
* The unemployment rate is 4.7%, up from 3.2% before the pandemic.
* 158,000 adults – 9% of all adults in the state – report not having enough food to eat. This includes 84,000 adults living with children, or 12% of all adults living with children, who report that the children in their household do not have enough to eat.
* An estimated 109,000 renters or 18% of renters are not caught up on rent.
* An estimated 609,000 adults or 31% of all adults statewide report having difficulty covering normal household expenses.
The Effect of the American Rescue Plan on Kansas
President Biden’s American Rescue Plan will provide Kansas with:
* $1.7 billion in state fiscal relief
* $1 billion in local fiscal relief
* More than $860 million in relief for K-12 schools
Economic impact payments of up to $1,400 per person (above the $600 per person provided in December) for more than 1.8 million adults and 740,000 children. This is 89% of all adults in the state and 86% of all children in the state.
* Additional relief of up to $1,600 per child through the Child Tax Credit to the families of 652,000 children, lifting 29,000 children out of poverty
* Additional relief of up to nearly $1,000 through the Earned Income Tax Credit to 169,000 childless workers, including many in frontline jobs
* Marketplace health insurance premiums that are $1,550 lower per month for a 60-year old couple earning $75,000 per year
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# American Rescue Plan Fact Sheet: Impact on Connecticut

Published March 2021
The American Rescue Plan: Impacts on Connecticut
The Need for Action in Connecticut
The pandemic and the associated economic crisis have had a severe impact on Connecticut. The need for action is clear:
* Since the pandemic began, more than 285,000 people have been infected with COVID-19 and more than 7,000 people have died.
* The unemployment rate is 8.2%, up from 3.7% before the pandemic.
* Since February 2020, more than 155,000 fewer people are employed.
* 181,000 adults – 9% of all adults in the state – report not having enough food to eat. This includes 170,000 adults living with children, or 12% of all adults living with children, who report that the children in their household do not have enough to eat.
* An estimated 91,000 renters or 11% of renters are not caught up on rent.
* An estimated 815,000 adults or 32% of all adults statewide report having difficulty covering normal household expenses.
The Effect of the American Rescue Plan on Connecticut
President Biden’s American Rescue Plan will provide Connecticut with:
* $2.9 billion in state fiscal relief
* $1.36 billion in local fiscal relief
* More than $1.1 billion in relief for K-12 schools
* Economic impact payments of up to $1,400 per person (above the $600 per person provided in December) for more than 2 million adults and 739,000 children. This is 80% of all adults in the state and 77% of all children in the state.
* Additional relief of up to $1,600 per child through the Child Tax Credit to the families of 608,000 children, lifting 29,000 children out of poverty
* Additional relief of up to nearly $1,000 through the Earned Income Tax Credit to 154,000 childless workers, including many in frontline jobs
* Marketplace health insurance premiums that are $1,930 lower per month for a 60-year old couple earning $75,000 per year
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# American Rescue Plan Fact Sheet: Impact on Hawaii

Published March 2021
The American Rescue Plan: Impacts on Hawaii
The Need for Action in Hawaii
The pandemic and the associated economic crisis have had a severe impact on Hawaii. The need for action is clear:
* Since the pandemic began, more than 27,000 people have been infected with COVID-19 and more than 400 people have died.
* The unemployment rate is 10.3%, up from 2.1% before the pandemic.
* Since February 2020, more than 69,000 fewer people are employed.
* 94,000 adults – 10% of all adults in the state – report not having enough food to eat. This includes 49,000 adults living with children, or 13% of all adults living with children, who report that the children in their household do not have enough to eat.
* An estimated 54,000 renters or 15% of renters are not caught up on rent.
* An estimated 361,000 adults or 35% of all adults statewide report having difficulty covering normal household expenses.
The Effect of the American Rescue Plan on Hawaii
President Biden’s American Rescue Plan will provide Hawaii with:
* $1.9 billion in state fiscal relief
* $600 million in local fiscal relief
* More than $423 million in relief for K-12 schools
* Economic impact payments of up to $1,400 per person (above the $600 per person provided in December) for more than 903,000 adults and 332,00 children. This is 88% of all adults in the state and 88% of all children in the state.
* Additional relief of up to $1,600 per child through the Child Tax Credit to the families of 278,000 million children, lifting 14,000 children out of poverty
* Additional relief of up to nearly $1,000 through the Earned Income Tax Credit to 69,000 childless workers, including many in frontline jobs
* Marketplace health insurance premiums that are $1,499 lower per month for a 60-year old couple earning $75,000 per year
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# American Rescue Plan Fact Sheet: Impact on Illinois

Published March 2021
The American Rescue Plan: Impacts on Illinois
The Need for Action in Illinois
The pandemic and the associated economic crisis have had a severe impact on Illinois. The need for action is clear:
* Since the pandemic began, more than 1.1 million people have been infected with COVID-19 and more than 23,000 people have died.
* The unemployment rate is 8%, up from 3.6% before the pandemic.
* Since February 2020, more than 468,000 fewer people are employed.
* 860,000 adults – 11% of all adults in the state – report not having enough food to eat. This includes 536,000 adults living with children, or 17% of all adults living with children, who report that the children in their household do not have enough to eat.
* An estimated 525,000 renters or 20% of renters are not caught up on rent.
* An estimated 3.1 million adults or 35% of all adults statewide report having difficulty covering normal household expenses.
The Effect of the American Rescue Plan on Illinois
President Biden’s American Rescue Plan will provide Illinois with:
* $8.2 billion in state fiscal relief
* $5.2 billion in local fiscal relief
* More than $5.2 billion in relief for K-12 schools
* Economic impact payments of up to $1,400 per person (above the $600 per person provided in December) for more than 7.5 million adults and 3 million children. This is 85% of all adults in the state and 83% of all children in the state.
* Additional relief of up to $1,600 per child through the Child Tax Credit to the families of 2.5 million children, lifting 153,000 children out of poverty
* Additional relief of up to nearly $1,000 through the Earned Income Tax Credit to 620,000 childless workers, including many in frontline jobs
* Marketplace health insurance premiums that are $1,266 lower per month for a 60-year old couple earning $75,000 per year
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# American Rescue Plan Fact Sheet: Impact on Georgia

Published March 2021
The American Rescue Plan: Impacts on Georgia
The Need for Action in Georgia
The pandemic and the associated economic crisis have had a severe impact on Georgia. The need for action is clear:
* Since the pandemic began, more than 1,023,487 people have been infected with COVID-19 and more than 17,906 people have died.
* The unemployment rate is 5.3%, up from 3.5% before the pandemic.
* Since February 2020, more than 192,477 fewer people are employed.
* 960,000 adults – 14% of all adults in the state – report not having enough food to eat. This includes 421,000 adults living with children, or 15% of all adults living with children, who report that the children in their household do not have enough to eat.
* An estimated 548,000 renters or 23% of renters are not caught up on rent.
* An estimated 2,779,000 adults or 37% of all adults statewide report having difficulty covering normal household expenses.
The Effect of the American Rescue Plan on Georgia
President Biden’s American Rescue Plan will provide Georgia with:
* $5.073 billion in state fiscal relief
* $3.559 billion in local fiscal relief
* More than $4.345 billion in relief for K-12 schools
* Economic impact payments of up to $1,400 per person (above the $600 per person provided in December) for more than 6,255,700 adults and 2,919,400 children. This is 88% of all adults in the state and 88% of all children in the state.
* Additional relief of up to $1,600 per child through the Child Tax Credit to the families of 2,274,000 children, lifting 171,000 children out of poverty
* Additional relief of up to nearly $1,000 through the Earned Income Tax Credit to 572,000 childless workers, including many in frontline jobs
* Marketplace health insurance premiums that are $1,406 lower per month for a 60-year old couple earning $75,000 per year
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Bengel

| Expand abbreviations An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Annotated/Bengel | Random word Special:RandomInCategory/Kluge's Etymological Dictionary of the German Language |
​ Bengel, m., ‘cudgel,’ then in a figurative sense ‘rude person, blackguard,’ from MidHG. bengel, m., ‘cudgel.’ Comp. E. bangle (club), from the verb to bang, OIc. banga, ‘to strike, beat,’ LG. bangen. The Teut. stem bang-, ‘to strike,’ seems to have been nasalised from the root bâg, mentioned under baren.
# An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Benne

| Expand abbreviations An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Annotated/Benne | Random word Special:RandomInCategory/Kluge's Etymological Dictionary of the German Language |
​ Benne, f., ‘wicker cart,’ MidHG. only; an old Alem. and perhaps orig. Kelt. word which Festus records as old Gallic benna. Comp. Fr. benne, ‘dosser,’ AS. binn, E. bin.
# An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Belche

| Expand abbreviations An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Annotated/Belche | Random word Special:RandomInCategory/Kluge's Etymological Dictionary of the German Language |
​ Belche (1.), f., ‘a kind of salmon’; of obscure origin. See Bolche.
Belche (2.), f., ‘coot,’ from MidHG. bęlche, OHG. bęlihha; Lat. fulica seems allied to it, although OHG. hh implies a Lat. g; the Germ. guttural suffix is the same as in Goth. ā̆haks, ‘pigeon.’ See also Habicht, Kranich.
# An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Berg

| Expand abbreviations An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Annotated/Berg | Random word Special:RandomInCategory/Kluge's Etymological Dictionary of the German Language |
​ Berg, m., ‘mountain,’ inherited from the OTeut. vocabulary; OHG. bërg, MidHG. bërc(g), m. Comp. AS. beorh(g), especially ‘barrow’ (called byrgels also), E. only in the deriv. ‘to bury’ (AS. byrgan), from *burgian; the Goth. form *bairga- is deduced from the deriv. bairgahei, ‘mountain range.’ The rules for the permutation of consonants demand a pre-Teut. bhérgho-; with this is connected Sans. bṛhant, ‘high’ (b from bh, because the aspiration at the beginning of the root was, on account of the following aspirate, necessarily lost); h is gh; Zend barezanh, ‘height,’ berezant, ‘high’; OIr. brigh, ‘mountain’ (ri, Sans. ṛ, might be compared with the ur of Burg), Armen. berj, ‘height,’ barjr, ‘high,’ W. and Armor. bre, ‘mountain, hill,’ W. bry, ‘high.’ Also the Kelt. proper names Brigiani and Brigantes, like the Teut. Burgunden, Burgundiones (lit. ‘monticulae’), and the name of the town Brigantia (Bregenz). Hence to the root bhergh belong the primary meanings ‘high, rising ground’ (OSlov. brěgŭ, ‘bank (of a river),’ is borrowed from G.); perhaps Burg is derived from this root, if it does not come from bergen. The attempt to connect Berg with Goth. fairguni and Hercynia, identical with the latter, must be abandoned. With zu Berge, ‘up, on end,’ comp. MidHG. ze tal, ‘down.’
# An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Bericht

| Expand abbreviations An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Annotated/Bericht | Random word Special:RandomInCategory/Kluge's Etymological Dictionary of the German Language |
​ Bericht, m., ‘intelligence, report,’ from MidHG. beriht, ‘report, instruction, reconciliation.’ Akin to recht.
# An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Beißker

| Expand abbreviations An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Annotated/Beißker | Random word Special:RandomInCategory/Kluge's Etymological Dictionary of the German Language |
​ Beißker, m., ‘loach,’ adopted from Slav. (Bohem. piskoŕ, Russ. piskárĭ), and based by popular etymology on beißen (the fish is also called Steinbeißer, ‘river-loach,’ Schlammbeißer, ‘pond-loach’).
# An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Bellhammel

| Expand abbreviations An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Annotated/Bellhammel | Random word Special:RandomInCategory/Kluge's Etymological Dictionary of the German Language |
​ Bellhammel, m., ‘bell-wether,’ ModHG. only; a LG. word (UpG. herma, equiv. to Herdmann, ‘herdsman’), corresponding exactly to Du. bel-hamel, E. bell-wether. Fr. clocheman, clocman (of Germ. origin), also Fr. mouton à la sonnette, make the connection of Bellhammel with Du. bel, MidDu. and AS. belle, E. bell, indubitable. In Fr. animal fables the bell-wether has the proper name Belin (akin to Fr. belier, ‘ram’), from the Du. bel, ‘little bell,’ whence also Fr. bélière, ‘ring of a bell-clapper.’
# An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Belt

| Expand abbreviations An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Annotated/Belt | Random word Special:RandomInCategory/Kluge's Etymological Dictionary of the German Language |
​ Belt, m., ‘straits,’ akin to OIc. belte, AS. and E. belt, baldrick (OHG. balz), ‘girdle, shoulder-belt’?. Belt is thus a ‘zone of land’?. The cognate Lat. balteus is, according to Varro, a Tuscan word.
# An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Bemme

| Expand abbreviations An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Annotated/Bemme | Random word Special:RandomInCategory/Kluge's Etymological Dictionary of the German Language |
​ Bemme, f., ‘slice of bread,’ first occurs in ModHG.; a LG. and MidG. word, a deriv. of the dial. bammen, ‘to eat,’ which may have been *bazmôn in Goth., and is perhaps primit. allied to the Sans. root bhas, ‘to chew.’
# An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Bendel

| Expand abbreviations An Etymological Dictionary of the German Language/Annotated/Bendel | Random word Special:RandomInCategory/Kluge's Etymological Dictionary of the German Language |
​ Bendel, m., from the equiv. MidHG. bendel, OHG. bentil; comp. MidE. bendel, OIc. bendell; akin to binden.
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume IV/Origen/Origen Against Celsus/Book VI/Chapter LXXV

Chapter LXXV.
To the preceding remarks he adds the following: “Since a divine Spirit inhabited the body (of Jesus), it must certainly have been different from that of other beings, in respect of grandeur, or beauty, or strength, or voice, or impressiveness, or persuasiveness. For it is impossible that He, to whom was imparted some divine quality beyond other beings, should not differ from others; whereas this person did not differ in any respect from another, but was, as they report, little, and ill-favoured, and ignoble.” Now it is evident by these words, that when Celsus wishes to bring a charge against Jesus, he adduces the sacred writings, as one who believed them to be writings apparently fitted to afford a handle for a charge against Him; but wherever, in the same writings, statements would appear to be made opposed to those charges which are adduced, he pretends not even to know them! There are, indeed, admitted to be recorded some statements respecting the body of Jesus having been “ill-favoured;” not, however, “ignoble,” as has been stated, nor is there any certain evidence that he was “little.” The language of Isaiah runs as follows, who prophesied regarding Him that He would come and visit the multitude, not in comeliness of form, nor in any surpassing beauty:  “Lord, who hath believed our report, and to whom was the arm of the Lord revealed? He made announcement before Him, as a child, as a root in a thirsty ground. He has no form nor glory, and we beheld Him, and He had no form nor beauty; but His form was without honour, and inferior to that of the sons of men.” These passages, then, Celsus listened to, because he thought they were of use to him in bringing a charge against Jesus; but he paid no attention to the words of the forty-fifth Psalm, and why it is then said, “Gird Thy sword upon Thy thigh, O most mighty, with Thy comeliness and beauty; and continue, and prosper, and reign.”
* ↑ κατάπληξιν.
* ↑ ἀγενές.
* ↑ Cf. Isa. liii. 1–3 (LXX.). [See Bishop Pearson’s Exposition of the Creed, Art. II., note.  S.]
* ↑ Cf. Ps. xlv. 3, 4 (LXX.).
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume IV/Origen/Origen Against Celsus/Book VI/Chapter LXXVI

Chapter LXXVI.
Let it be supposed, however, that he had not read the prophecy, or that he had read it, but had been drawn away by those who misinterpreted it as not being spoken of Jesus Christ.  What has he to say of the Gospel, in the narratives of which Jesus ascended up into a high mountain, and was transfigured before the disciples, and was seen in glory, when both Moses and Elias, “being seen in glory, spake of the decease which He was about to accomplish at Jerusalem?” or when the prophet says, “We beheld Him, and He had no form nor beauty,” etc.? and Celsus accepts this prophecy as referring to Jesus, being blinded in so accepting it, and not seeing that it is a great proof that the Jesus who appeared to be “without form” was the Son of God, that His very appearance should have been made the subject of prophecy many years before His birth.  But if another prophet speak of His comeliness and beauty, he will no longer accept the prophecy as referring to Christ! And if it were to be clearly ascertained from the Gospels that “He had no form nor beauty, but that His appearance was without honour, and inferior to that of the sons of men,” it might be said that it was not with reference to the prophetic writings, but to the Gospels, that Celsus made his remarks. But now, as neither the Gospels nor the apostolic writings indicate that “He had no form nor beauty,” it is evident that we must accept the declaration of the prophets as true of Christ, and this will prevent the charge against Jesus from being advanced.
* ↑ [Luke ix. 31. S.]
* ↑ προβαινειν.