OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Amon, j

Amon, j. See AMMON, J.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Amodei, Cataldus

Amodei, Cataldus, composer and chapel-master at Naples, died in 1695. He published some cantatas, &c.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Ammerbacher, J. G

Ammerbacher, J. G. Singer at Nordlingen, published in 1717 a short method for singing.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Ammon, J

Ammon, J. Director of the music at Heiltronn. He went to nixie about the year 1790, and has published there many instrumental works.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Amorevolemente

Amorevolemente. (I.) With extreme affection.
# Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Somalia, 2017

Notice published at Whitehouse.gov on April 6, 2017. Notice filed on April 6, 2017 at 11:15 A.M. and published at the Federal Registar on April 7, 2017. Scan: File:Presidential Notice Regarding the Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Somalia, 2017.pdf.
Administration of Donald J. Trump , 2017
April 6, 2017
By the President of the United States of America
A Notice
Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Somalia
The Archivist of the United States
On April 12, 2010, by Executive Order 13536, the President declared a national emergency to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the deterioration of the security situation and the persistence of violence in Somalia, acts of piracy and armed robbery at sea off the coast of Somalia, which have repeatedly been the subject of United Nations Security Council resolutions, and violations of the arms embargo imposed by the United Nations Security Council.
On July 20, 2012, the President issued Executive Order 13620 to take additional steps to deal with the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13536 in view of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2036 of February 22, 2012, and Resolution 2002 of July 29, 2011, and to address: exports of charcoal from Somalia, which generate significant revenue for al-Shabaab; the misappropriation of Somali public assets; and certain acts of violence committed against civilians in Somalia ‑‑ all of which contribute to the deterioration of the security situation and the persistence of violence in Somalia.
The situation with respect to Somalia continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on April 12, 2010, and the measures adopted on that date and on July 20, 2012, to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond April 12, 2017. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13536.
This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress.
    Donald J. Trump
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Stabilization of Iraq, 2017

Notice published at Whitehouse.gov on May 16, 2017. Notice filed on May 17, 2017 at 11:15 A.M. and published at the Federal Registar on May 18, 2017. Scan: File:Presidential Notice Regarding the Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Stabilization of Iraq, 2017.pdf.
Administration of Donald J. Trump , 2017
May 16, 2017
By the President of the United States of America
A Notice
Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Stabilization of Iraq
The Archivist of the United States
On May 22, 2003, by Executive Order 13303, the President declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by obstacles to the orderly reconstruction of Iraq, the restoration and maintenance of peace and security in the country, and the development of political, administrative, and economic institutions in Iraq.
The obstacles to the orderly reconstruction of Iraq, the restoration and maintenance of peace and security in the country, and the development of political, administrative, and economic institutions in Iraq continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303, as modified in scope and relied upon for additional steps taken in Executive Order 13315 of August 28, 2003, Executive Order 13350 of July 29, 2004, Executive Order 13364 of November 29, 2004, Executive Order 13438 of July 17, 2007, and Executive Order 13668 of May 27, 2014, must continue in effect beyond May 22, 2017. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to the stabilization of Iraq declared in Executive Order 13303.
This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress.
    Donald J. Trump
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities, 2017

Notice published at Whitehouse.gov on March 29, 2017. Notice filed on March 30, 2017 at 11:15 A.M. and published at the Federal Registar on March 31, 2017. Scan: File:Presidential Notice Regarding the Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities, 2017.pdf.
Administration of Donald J. Trump , 2017
March 29, 2017
By the President of the United States of America
A Notice
Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities, 2017
The Archivist of the United States
On April 1, 2015, by Executive Order 13694, the President declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by the increasing prevalence and severity of malicious cyber enabled activities originating from, or directed by persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States. On December 28, 2016, the President issued Executive Order 13757 to take additional steps to address the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13694.
These significant malicious cyber-enabled activities continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on April 1, 2015, must continue in effect beyond April 1, 2017. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13694.
This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress.
    Donald J. Trump
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks, 2017

Memorandum published at whitehouse.gov on September 11, 2017. Notice published at Whitehouse.gov on September 11, 2017. Notice filed on September 12, 2017 at 11:15 A.M. and published at the Federal Registar on September 13, 2017. Scan: File:Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks, 2017.pdf.
Administration of Donald J. Trump , 2017
September 11, 2017
By the President of the United States of America
A Notice
Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks
The Archivist of the United States

## Letter to Congress

Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)) provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, within 90 days of the anniversary date of its declaration, the President publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to the Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the anniversary date. Consistent with this provision, I have sent to the Federal Register the enclosed notice, stating that the emergency declared in Proclamation 7463 of September 14, 2001, "National Emergency by Reason of Certain Terrorist Attacks," is to continue in effect beyond September 14, 2017.
The threat of terrorism that resulted in the declaration of a national emergency on September 14, 2001, continues. The authorities that have been invoked under that declaration of a national emergency continue to be critical to the ability of the Armed Forces of the United States to perform essential missions in the United States and around the world to address the continuing threat of terrorism. For these reasons, I have determined that it is necessary to continue in effect the national emergency declared on September 14, 2001, in response to certain terrorist attacks.

## Notice

Consistent with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 1622(d), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency previously declared on September 14, 2001, in Proclamation 7463, with respect to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on the United States.
Because the terrorist threat continues, the national emergency declared on September 14, 2001, and the powers and authorities adopted to deal with that emergency must continue in effect beyond September 14, 2017. Therefore, I am continuing in effect for an additional year the national emergency declared on September 14, 2001, in response to certain terrorist attacks.This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress.
    Donald J. Trump
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Iran, 2017

Memorandum published at whitehouse.gov on November 6., 2017. Notice published at Whitehouse.gov on November 6, 2017. Notice filed on November 7, 2017 at 11:15 A.M. and published at the Federal Register on November 8, 2017. Scan: File:Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Iran, 2017.pdf. Cf. Notice on the Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Iran.
Administration of Donald J. Trump , 2017
November 6, 2017
By the President of the United States of America
A Notice
Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Iran, 2017
The Archivist of the United States

## Letter to Congress

Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)) provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, within 90 days of the anniversary date of its declaration, the President publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to the Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the anniversary date. In accordance with this provision, I have sent to the Federal Register for publication the enclosed notice stating that the national emergency with respect to Iran that was declared in Executive Order 12170 of November 14, 1979, is to continue in effect beyond November 14, 2017.
Our relations with Iran have not yet normalized, and the process of implementing the agreements with Iran, dated January 19, 1981, is ongoing. For this reason, I have determined that it is necessary to continue the national emergency declared in Executive Order 12170 with respect to Iran.

## Notice

On November 14, 1979, in Executive Order 12170, the President declared a national emergency with respect to Iran pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-50 U.S.C. 1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States.
Our relations with Iran have not yet normalized, and the process of implementing the agreements with Iran, dated January 19, 1981, is ongoing. For this reason, the national emergency declared on November 14, 1979, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond November 14, 2017. In accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to Iran declared in Executive Order 12170.
The emergency declared in Executive Order 12170 is distinct from the emergency declared in Executive Order 12957 on March 15, 1995. This renewal, therefore, is distinct from the emergency renewal of January 13, 2017.
This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress.
    Donald J. Trump
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Daniel Deronda (First Edition)/Volume 2

DANIEL DERONDA
BY
GEORGE ELIOT
VOL. II.
WILLIAM BLACKWOOD AND SONS EDINBURGH AND LONDON MDCCCLXXVI
Book III.
* Chapter XIX.
* Chapter XX.
* Chapter XXI.
* Chapter XXII.
* Chapter XXIII.
* Chapter XXIV.
* Chapter XXV.
* Chapter XXVI.
* Chapter XXVII.
Book IV.
* Chapter XXVIII.
* Chapter XXIX.
* Chapter XXX.
* Chapter XXXI.
* Chapter XXXII.
* Chapter XXXIII.
* Chapter XXXIV.
# Contempt of Court Act

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Contempt of Court Act."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Contempt of Court Act 1981 (c. 49), an UK Act of Parliament that defined strict liability contempt of court, criminalized some conducts as contempt of court, and prescribed the penalties to be awarded by different levels of courts.
* Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act 70 of 1971), an Indian Act that codified the law on contempt of court.
* Contempt of Court Act 2019 (2019 No 44), a New Zealand Act that codified the law on contempt of court.
# Contentment (Holmes)

"Man wants but little here below"
Little I ask; my wants are few;  I only wish a hut of stone, (A very plain brown stone will do,)  That I may call my own;— And close at hand is such a one, In yonder street that fronts the sun.
Plain food is quite enough for me;  Three courses are as good as ten;— If Nature can subsist on three,  Thank Heaven for three. Amen! I always thought cold victual nice;— My choice would be vanilla-ice.
I care not much for gold or land;—  Give me a mortgage here and there,— Some good bank-stock, some note of hand,  Or trifling railroad share,— I only ask that Fortune send A little more than I shall spend.
Honors are silly toys, I know,  And titles are but empty names; I would, perhaps, be Plenipo,—  But only near St. James; I'm very sure I should not care To fill our Gubernator's chair.
Jewels are baubles; 't is a sin  To care for such unfruitful things;— One good-sized diamond in a pin,—  Some, not so large, in rings,— A ruby, and a pearl, or so, Will do for me;—I laugh at show.
My dame should dress in cheap attire;  (Good, heavy silks are never dear;)— I own perhaps I might desire  Some shawls of true Cashmere,— Some marrowy crapes of China silk, Like wrinkled skins on scalded milk.
I would not have the horse I drive  So fast that folks must stop and stare; An easy gait—two forty-five—  Suits me; I do not care;— Perhaps, for just a single spurt, Some seconds less would do no hurt.
Of pictures, I should like to own  Titians and Raphaels three or four,— I love so much their style and tone,  One Turner, and no more, (A landscape,—foreground golden dirt,— The sunshine painted with a squirt.)
Of books but few,—some fifty score  For daily use, and bound for wear; The rest upon an upper floor;—  Some little luxury there Of red morocco's gilded gleam And vellum rich as country cream.
Busts, cameos, gems,—such things as these,  Which others often show for pride, I value for their power to please,  And selfish churls deride;— One Stradivarius, I confess, Two Meerschaums, I would fain possess.
Wealth's wasteful tricks I will not learn,  Nor ape the glittering upstart fool;— Shall not carved tables serve my turn,  But all must be of buhl? Give grasping pomp its double share,— I ask but one recumbent chair.
Thus humble let me live and die,  Nor long for Midas' golden touch; If Heaven more generous gifts deny,  I shall not miss them much,— Too grateful for the blessing lent Of simple tastes and mind content!
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Contentment Rag

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Davis v. Brown

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
94 U.S. 423
Davis v. Brown
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
This action was against the defendants, as second indorsers of certain promissory notes, transferred by them to the Ocean National Bank of the city of New York. The bank having failed, the notes came into the possession of the plaintiff, as its receiver. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court. The defendants obtained judgment, and the plaintiff brought the case here.
Argued by Mr. H. G. Miller for the plaintiff in error, and submitted by Mr. U. P. Smith and Mr. Stephen Sibley for the defendants in error.
Mr. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Davis v. Bilsland/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
85 U.S. 659
Davis v. Bilsland
First. That the action is a joinder in one suit of an action of assumpsit for work and labor, with a chancery proceeding to foreclose the equity of redemption.
This ground of objection having been already fully considered in the case of Hornbuckle v. Toombs, needs no further discussion.
Secondly. That the claim of a mechanic for a statutory lien cannot be enforced by an assignee by a suit in his own name.
In answer to this objection it is sufficient to refer to the fourth section of the Civil Practice Act of Montana, which provides that actions shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest. McKillican had completed his claim by filing his lien before assigning it to the plaintiff. It was perfectly lawful for him to assign his claim. It was not against any principle of public policy to do so. When assigned, the claim really belonged to the plaintiff, and according to the code he was the proper person to bring suit upon it.
Thirdly. That the mortgage of the defendant was entitled to priority over the claims of the plaintiff, which were not filed till November, 1869, and Bilsland did not commence work until after the mortgage was given.
The language of the eighth section of the mechanic's lien law of Montana is unambiguous. The liens secured to the mechanics and material-men have precedence over all other incumbrances put upon the property after the commencement of the building. And this is just. Why should a purchaser or lender have the benefit of the labor and materials which go into the property and give it its existence and value? At all events the law is clear, and the decree was right.
DECREE AFFIRMED.
Dissenting, Justices CLIFFORD, DAVIS, and STRONG.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Davis v. Burke

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
179 U.S. 399
Davis v. Burke
Argued: December 3, 1900. --- Decided: December 17, 1900
This was an appeal from an order denying a writ of habeas corpus to the appellant Davis, who was, on April 15, 1897, found guilty of murder in the district court of Cassia County, Idaho, and sentenced to be hanged June 4, 1897.
Motion for a new trial was denied, an appeal taken to the supreme court of Idaho, and on May 6, 1898, the judgment of the lower court was affirmed. 53 Pac. 678.
His execution having been postponed, an application for pardon was presented to the State Board of Pardons, and was denied January 23, 1899. Thereupon a petition for a writ of habeas corpus was presented to the United States District Judge for Idaho, which was denied January 30; and an appeal taken from this order was on October 16, 1899, dismissed by the circuit court of appeals (Davis v. Burke, 38 C. C. A. 299, 97 Fed. Rep. 501), upon the ground that, as the appeal involved a construction of the Federal Constitution, that court was without jurisdiction.
Section 8021 of the Revised Statutes of Idaho provides that executions of defendants convicted of murder in the first degree shall take place at the county jail under the direction of the sheriff; but while this case was pending before the circuit court of appeals this section of the statute was amended (Laws 1899, p. 340), so as to provide for the execution of criminals at the state penitentiary under the direction of the warden. After the passage of this act, February 18, 1899, Davis was removed from the jail of Cassia county to the state penitentiary.
Upon being advised that this proceeding was erroneous, Burke, the sheriff of Cassia county, applied to the supreme court of Idaho for a writ of habeas corpus. That court decided that the act of February 18, 1899, above mentioned, regulating the time, place, and manner of inflicting a death penalty, was not applicable to past offenses, and that Davis should be executed in accordance with the law as it stood at the time of the commission of the offense, the trial, and original sentence. 59 Pac. 544. In accordance with that decision appellant was returned to the custody of the sheriff.
After the decision in the circuit court of appeals, and while awaiting a resentence by the state court, appellant presented this petition for a writ of habeas corpus to the circuit court of the United States for the district of Idaho, and upon the denial of such petition appealed to this court.
[Messrs. James H. Hawley and George Ainslie for appellant.
Messrs. Samuel H. Hays and W. E. Borah for appellee.
Mr. Justice Brown delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# County of Schuyler v. Thomas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
98 U.S. 169
County of Schuyler v. Thomas
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. George W. McCrary for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. A. J. Baker and Mr. F. T. Hughes, contra.
MR. JUSTICE HUNT delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse