OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 17

Chap. XVII.—An Act making an appropriation for defraying the expenses which may arise from carrying into effect the convention made between the United States and the French Republic.
Specific appropriation.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That for the payment of such demands as may be justly due for French vessels and property captured, and which must be restored or paid for, pursuant to the convention between the United States and the French republic, there be appropriated a sum not exceeding three hundred and eighteen thousand dollars, to be paid, under the direction of the President of the United States, out of any public money in the treasury, not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, April 3, 1802.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 25

Chap. XXV.—An Act to revive, and continue in force, an act, intituled “An act to augment the salaries of the officers therein mentioned,” passed the second day of March, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-nine.
Former act revived and continued. March 2, 1799, ch. 38. For what time.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That an act, intituled “An act to augment the salaries of the officers therein mentioned,” be, and the same is hereby revived, and continued in force, for and during the term of two years, from the commencement of the present year.
Approved, April 14, 1802.
# United States v. Bertelsen & Petersen Engineering Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
306 U.S. 276
United States v. Bertelsen & Petersen Engineering Company
Argued: Feb. 2, 3, 1939. --- Decided: Feb 27, 1939
The Attorney General, and Mr. Charles A. Horsky, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. O. Walker Taylor, of Boston, Mass., for respondent Bertelsen & Petersen Engineering Co.
Mr. Hayner N. Larson, of Minneapolis, Minn., for respondent Jaffray and others.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Bess

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
357 U.S. 51
United States v. Bess
Argued: April 7, 1958. --- Decided: June 9, 1958
Mr. John F. Davis, Washington, D.C., for the United States.
Mr. Morris J. Oppenheim, Newark, N.J., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Bethlehem Steel Company (205 U.S. 105)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
205 U.S. 105
United States v. Bethlehem Steel Company
Argued: January 28, 29, 1907. --- Decided: March 11, 1907

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Bethlehem Steel Company (389 U.S. 575)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 575
United States v. Bethlehem Steel Company (389 U.S. 575)
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Sanders, Alan S. Rosenthal and Martin Jacobs, for the United States.
David R. Owen, for respondent Bethlehem Steel Co.
William A. Grimes, for respondent Moran Towing & Transportation Co., Inc.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Bethlehem Steel Company (258 U.S. 321)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
258 U.S. 321
United States v. Bethlehem Steel Company (258 U.S. 321)
Argued: March 16, 1922. --- Decided: April 10, 1922
Mr. Daniel L. Morris, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Messrs. Geo. W. Dalzell, of Washington, D. C., Clarence P. Byrnes, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Robert C. Hayden, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from page 322-323 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McKENNA delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Bethlehem Steel Company

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Bethlehem Steel Company."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Bethlehem Steel Company (205 U.S. 105)
* United States v. Bethlehem Steel Company (258 U.S. 321)
* United States v. Bethlehem Steel Company (389 U.S. 575)
See also Bethlehem Steel Company v. United States.
# United States v. Belt

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
319 U.S. 521
United States v. Belt
Argued: June 7, 1943. ---
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.
Messrs Charles Fahy, Sol. Gen., and Alexander H. Bell, Jr., both of Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Messrs. Milton D. Campbell and Walter M. Bastian, both of Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Belmont

United States Supreme Court
301 U.S. 324
United States v. Belmont
Argued: March 4, 1937. --- Decided: May 3, 1937
Messrs. Stanley Reed, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and David E. Hudson, of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
Mr. C. W. Wickersham, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Benedict

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Benedict."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Benedict (261 U.S. 294)
* United States v. Benedict (338 U.S. 692)
See also Benedict v. United States.
# United States v. Bellingham Bay Boom Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
176 U.S. 211
United States v. Bellingham Bay Boom Company
Argued: January 18, 1899. --- Decided: for oral argument March 13, 1899
Solicitor General Richards for appellant.
No counsel for appellee.
Mr. Justice Peckham delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Benecke

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
98 U.S. 447
United States v. Benecke
CERTIFICATE of division in opinion between the judges of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Assistant Attorney-General Smith for the United States.
Mr. Louis Benecke, in propria persona, contra.
MR. JUSTICE MILLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 12

Chap. XII.—An Act for extending the external commerce of the United States.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the sum of two thousand five hundred dollars be, and the same is hereby appropriated for the purpose of extending the external commerce of the United States, to be paid out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, February 28, 1803.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 14

Chap. XIV.—An Act for continuing in force a law, intituled “An act for establishing trading houses with the Indian tribes.”
Act of April 18, 1796, ch. 13, continued for two years from 4th March, 1803.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That a law passed on the eighteenth day of April, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and ninety-six, intituled “An act for establishing trading houses within the Indian tribes,” and which law was revived and continued by another, passed on the thirtieth day of April, in the year of our Lord, one thousand eight hundred and two, shall be, and the same is hereby farther continued for the term of two years, from the fourth day of March next, and from thence until the end of the next session of Congress.
Approved, February 28, 1803.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 16

Chap. XVI.—An Act supplementary to the act intituled “An act providing passports for the ships and vessels of the United States.”
Act of June 1, 1796, ch. 45. Unregistered vessels sailing with sea letters to be furnished with passports on paying ten dollars.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That every unregistered ship or vessel owned by a citizen or citizens of the United States, and sailing with a sea-letter, going to any foreign country, shall, before she departs from the United States, at the request of the master, be furnished by the collector of the district where such vessel may be, with a passport of the form prescribed and established by the act to which this is a supplement, for which the master shall pay to the collector ten dollars, and be subject to the rules and conditions prescribed in the said act, for ships and vessels of the United States.
Unregistered vessels sailing to foreign countries to pay the same on clearing as vessels of the U. States.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That there shall be paid on every such unregistered ship or vessel, sailing or trading to any foreign country, other than some port or place in America, for each and every voyage, the sum at the time of clearing outwards, to be received and accounted for in the same manner as is by said act required in cases of ships and vessels of the United States.
Approved, March 2, 1803.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 1

Chapter Ⅰ.—An Act making a partial appropriation for the Naval Service, during the year one thousand eight hundred and three.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the sum of one hundred thousand dollars be, and the same hereby is appropriated towards defraying the expenses of the navy of the United States, during the year one thousand eight hundred and three.
Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the aforesaid sum shall be paid, first, out of any balance remaining unexpended of former appropriations for the same object; and secondly, out of any monies in the treasury, not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, January 14, 1803.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 13

Chap. XIII.—An Act in addition to an act, entituled “An act fixing the military peace establishment of the United States.”
Two teachers of music added to the artillerists. 1802, ch. 9.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That there be added to the regiment of artillerists, two teachers of music, whose pay, rations and clothing shall be the same as is by law allowed to the teachers of music in the regiments of infantry in the service of the United States.
A teacher of the French language, and a teacher of drawing appointed to the corps of engineers.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the President of the United States be, and he is hereby authorized to appoint one teacher of the French language, and one teacher of drawing, to be attached to the corps of engineers, whose compensation shall not exceed the pay and emolument of a captain in the line of the army.
​Authority to enlist one artificer and eighteen men.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That the commanding officer of the corps of engineers, be authorized to enlist for a term, not less than three years, one artificer, and eighteen men, to aid in making practical experiments and for other purposes:—to receive the same pay, rations and clothing as are allowed to the artificers and privates, in the army of the United States; and the same bounty when enlisted for five years; and to be subject to the rules and articles of war.
Clerk hire to certain officers of the army.Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That the President of the United States be, and he is hereby authorized to allow to the paymaster of the army, the adjutant and inspector of the army, and the military agent at Philadelphia, such sums, not exceeding in the whole three thousand dollars, for clerk hire, as their respective duties may, in his opinion, reasonably require.
Approved, February 28, 1803.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 11

Chap. XI.—An Act to provide an additional armament for the protection of the seamen and commerce of the United States.
President authorized to put into service four vessels of sixteen guns each.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be, and he hereby is authorized and empowered to cause to be built, or to be purchased (if the exigencies of the service shall require it) four vessels of war, to carry not exceeding sixteen guns each; to be armed, manned and fitted out for the protection of the seamen and commerce of the United States in the Mediterranean and adjacent seas, and for other purposes, as the public service may require.
Appropriation for the above.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the sum of ninety-six thousand dollars be, and hereby is, appropriated for the purpose aforesaid, out of any monies in the treasury of the United States, not otherwise appropriated.
President authorized to put into service fifteen gun boats. Appropriation for the above.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That the President of the United States be, and he is hereby authorized and empowered to cause to be built, a number not exceeding fifteen gun boats, to be armed, manned and fitted out, and employed for such purposes as in his opinion the public service may require; and that a sum not exceeding fifty thousand dollars be, and hereby is appropriated for this purpose out of any monies in the treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, February 28, 1803.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 15

Chap. XV.—An Act in addition to an act, intituled “An act more effectually to provide for the National defence, by establishing an uniform Militia throughout the United States.”
Act of May 8, 1792, ch. 33. Act of April 10, 1806, article 20. Act of April 18, 1814, ch. 76. Act of May 12, 1820, ch. 96. Act of March 2, 1821, ch. 12. Adjutant-general of the militia to make returns to the President annually. Act of April 20, 1816, ch. 64. Abstracts of the returns to be laid before Congress. Citizens enrolled in the militia to be constantly provided with arms, &c.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That it shall be the duty of the adjutant-general of the militia in each state, to make return of the militia of the state to which he belongs, with their arms, accoutrements, and ammunition, agreeably to the directions of the act, to which this is an addition, to the President of the United States annually, on or before the first Monday in January in each year: and it shall be the duty of the Secretary of War, from time to time, to give such directions to the adjutant-generals of the militia, as shall, in his opinion, be necessary to produce an uniformity in the said returns, and he shall lay an abstract of the same before Congress, on or before the first Monday of February, annually.
Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That every citizen duly enrolled in the militia, shall be constantly provided with arms, accoutrements, and ammunition, agreeably to the direction of the said act, from and after he shall be duly notified of his enrolment; and any notice or warning to the citizens so enrolled, to attend a company, battalion, or regimental muster, or training, which shall be according to the laws of the state in which it is given for that purpose, shall be deemed a legal notice of his enrolment.
Additional officers to the militia.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That in addition to the officers provided for by the said act, there shall be, to the militia of each state one quartermaster-general, to each brigade one quartermaster of brigade, and to each regiment one chaplain.
Approved, February 28, 1803.
# United States v. Maish

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
171 U.S. 242
United States v. Maish
Matt. G. Reynolds, for the United States.
Rochester Ford and George Lines, for appellees.
Mr. Justice BREWER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Malphurs

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
316 U.S. 1
United States v. Malphurs
Argued: March 5, 6, 1942. --- Decided: April 6, 1942
Messrs. Francis Biddle, Atty. Gen., and Herbert Wechsler, of Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Messrs. John L. Graham and Francis P. Whitehair, both of De Land, Fla., for appellees.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Mann

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
95 U.S. 580
United States v. Mann
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.
This is an action by the United States to recover from the defendant $500, as a forfeiture for an alleged violation of sect. 3177 of the Revised Statutes.
The complaint alleges that on the 7th of January, 1875, in the daytime, in the city of St. Paul, Minn., the defendant, Walter Mann, who was then and there the vice-president of the Merchants' National Bank of St. Paul, had the charge and superintendence of the place of business, to wit, the rooms and vaults occupied by said bank, in which said place of business were then and there kept by said bank certain articles subject to tax, to wit, certain bank-checks which had theretofore been drawn upon and paid by said bank, a more particular description whereof is to the plaintiff unknown.
That the defendant, having then and there the charge and superintendence of the said place of business of said bank in which were then and there kept the aforesaid paid bank-checks, was, by Irving Todd, who was then and there the collector of the internal revenue of the United States in and for the collection district of which the said city was then and is a part, and who had then and there entered the said place of business of sid bank for the purpose of examining, as such collector, the said paid bank-checks, then and there duly requested to suffer him, the said collector, as such, to examine the paid bank-checks aforesaid, so kept by said bank then and there in its said place of business, and that the said defendant then and there refused to suffer the said collector to examine said checks, or any one or part of the same, contrary to the statute in such case made and provided.
The defendant demurred, on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The demurrer having been sustained, and judgment rendered for the defendant, the United States brought the case here.
The Solicitor-General for the United States.
Mr. George L. Otis, contra.
MR. JUSTICE CLIFFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Malcolm/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
282 U.S. 792
United States v. Malcolm
Argued: Jan. 19, 1931. ---
The first question certified is answered: No. The second question is answered: Yes. Poe v. Seaborn, 282 U.S. 101, 51 S.C.t. 58, 75 L. Ed. 239; Goodell v. Koch, 282 U.S. 118, 51 S.C.t. 62, 75 L. Ed. 247; Hopkins v. Bacon, 282 U.S. 122, 51 S.C.t. 62, 75 L. Ed. 249, decided November 24, 1930.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Maher

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
307 U.S. 148
United States v. Maher
Argued: Feb. 6, 1939. --- Decided: April 17, 1939
See 307 U.S. --, 59 S.Ct. 831, 83 L.Ed. --.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon.
Messrs. Hugh B. Cox, of Washington, D.C., and Frank Murphy, Atty. Gen., for appellants.
Mr. William L. Harrison, of Portland, Or., for appellee.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/14th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 142

Chap. CXLII.—An Act to increase the compensation of the superintendents of the manufactories of arms at Springfield and Harper’s Ferry.
Compensation increased.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That in addition to the pay and rations, as at present fixed, or the superintendents of the manufactories of arms, at Springfield and Harper’s Ferry, they shall receive thirty dollars per months, and one ration per day.
Approved, April 29, 1816.