OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Laches

is a Socratic dialogue written by Plato. Participants in the discourse present competing definitions of the concept of courage.
English-language translations of el:Λάχης include:
* Laches, trans. by Thomas Taylor (1804) (transcription project)
* Laches, trans. by George Burges (1851) (transcription project)
* Laches, trans. by William Whewell (1859) (transcription project)
* Laches, trans. by William Whewell (2nd ed.) (1860) (transcription project)
* Laches, trans. by Benjamin Jowett (1871)
* Laches, trans. by Ellen Francis Mason (1891) (transcription project)
* The Laches of Plato, trans. by A. Lloyd (1891) (transcription project)
* Laches, trans. by Josiah Wright (189-) (transcription project)
* Laches, trans. by John Gibson (1892)
* Laches, trans. by B. Newhall (1900) (transcription project)
# Lachesis

Over a slow-dying fire,  Dreaming old dreams, I am sitting; The flames leap up and expire;  A woman sits opposite knitting.
I've taken a Fate to wife;  She knits with a half-smile mocking Me, and my dreams, and my life,  All into a worsted stocking.
This work is in the public domain in Australia because it was created in Australia and the term of copyright has expired. According to Australian Copyright Council - Duration of Copyright, the following works are public domain:
* published non-government works whose author died before January 1, 1955,
* anonymous or pseudonymous works and photographs published before January 1, 1955, and
* government works published more than 50 years ago (before January 1, 1974).
This work is also in the public domain in the United States because it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days), and it was first published before 1989 without complying with U.S. copyright formalities (renewal and/or copyright notice) and it was in the public domain in Australia on the URAA date (January 1, 1996). This is the combined effect of Australia having joined the Berne Convention in 1928, and of 17 USC 104A with its critical date of January 1, 1996.
Because the Australian copyright term in 1996 was 50 years, the critical date for copyright in the United States under the URAA is January 1, 1946.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lachin y Gair

Poem that became a popular Scottish folk song. Also known as Lochnagar, Loch na Gar, Loch na Garr, Loch-na-gar or Dark Lochnagar.

### Poem

* "Lachin y Gair" in The Works of Lord Byron, by George Gordon Byron (1903)

### Song

* "Loch na Gar" in Ten Favourite Songs (1830-1837(?))
* "Loch-na-gar" in The Book of Scottish Song (1843)
# Julian Messner, Inc. v. Spahn/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
387 U.S. 239
Julian Messner, Inc. v. Spahn
The motion of the Authors League of America, Inc., for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of New York for further consideration in light of Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374, 87 S.Ct. 534, 17 L.Ed.2d 456.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice FORTAS would dismiss the appeal for want of a substantial federal question.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Julian Messner, Inc. v. Spahn

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
387 U.S. 239
Julian Messner, Inc. v. Spahn
Selig J. Levitan, for appellants.
Arthur K. Radin, for appellee.
Irwin Karp, for Authors League of America, Inc., amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Julius Caesar

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Julius Caesar."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a play by William Shakespeare.
* Julius Cæsar by William Alexander from Monarchicke Tragedies
* "Julius Cæsar," by William Hazlitt in Characters of Shakespear's Plays (1817)
* "Cæsar, Julius (1558-1636)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
* "Cæsar, Julius (1656?-1712?)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
* "Caesar, Gaius Julius," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Caesar, Sir Julius," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Cæsar, Gaius Julius," in The New Student's Reference Work, Chicago: F.E. Compton and Co. (1914)

## See also

* Julius Caesar (100 BCE–44 BCE), the Roman military commander, ruler, and author.
# Juliana Horatia Ewing

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Juliana Horatia Ewing."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Ewing, Juliana Horatia," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
* "Ewing, Mrs. Juliana Horatia," in A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature, by John William Cousin, London: J. M. Dent & Sons (1910)

### See also

* Author:Juliana Horatia Ewing
# Julius Caesar (1919) Yale

* related portals: The Yale Shakespeare.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, quotes, Wikidata item.
Part of The Yale Shakespeare series
Layout 2
∵ The Yale Shakespeare ∵
THE TRAGEDY OF JULIUS CÆSAR
EDITED BY LAWRENCE MASON
NEW HAVEN • YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON • HUMPHREY MILFORD OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS • MCMXIX
Copyright, 1919 By Yale University Press
First published, May, 1919
TABLE OF CONTENTS :
| | PAGE |
| The Text | 1 |
| Act I | 1 |
| Act II | 22 |
| Act III | 43 |
| Act IV | 66 |
| Act V | 83 |
| Notes | 99 |
| Appendix A. Sources of the Play | 112 |
| Appendix B. The History of the Play | 115 |
| Appendix C. The Text of the Present Edition | 118 |
| Appendix D. Suggestions for Collateral Reading | 119 |
| Index of Words Glossed | 121 |
The facsimile opposite represents page two in Mr. William A. White's copy of the fifth quarto edition. Three copies of this edition are known to survive.
THE YALE SHAKESPEARE
Edited by
Wilbur L. CrossTucker Brooke
Willard Higley Durham
Published under the Direction
of the
Department of English, Yale University,
on the Fund
Given to the Yale University Press in 1917
by the Members of the
Kingsley Trust Association
To Commemorate the Seventy-Fifth Anniversary
of the Founding of the Society
PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1939, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 84 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Irish Free State accepts invitation to participate in Kellogg-Briand Pact

* related portals: Ireland.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
text is reproduced from The Times of June 6, 1928 and is the text of the Irish Free State Government's acceptance of the United States Government's invitation to participate in the proposed Kellogg-Briand Pact.
Excellency, I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your Excellency's Note of 22nd May referring to, the draft Treaty for the renunciation of war and extending an invitation from your Government to the Government of the Irish Free State to become one of the original parties to the proposed Treaty. The Government of the Irish Free State warmly welcome the action of the United States Government in initiating this further advance towards the maintenanice of general peace. They are in cordial agreerment with the general principle of the draft Treaty, which they confidently hope will ensure the peacful settlement of future international disputes.
Sharing the view expressed by the Secretary of State of the United States in his speech before the American Society of International Law that nothing in the draft Treatvy is inconsistent with the Covenant of the League of Nations, the Government of the Irish Free State accept unreservedly the invitation of the United States Government to become a party to the Treaty jointly with the other State similarly invited. The Governmnent of the Irish Free State will be glad, therefore, to participate in and to further by every possible means the negotiations which may be necessary for the conclusion of the Pact.
Accept, Excellency, the renewed assurances of my highest esteem. McGrath, Minister for External Affairs.
# Joseph P. Hoge's Sine die Address of March 3, 1879

Gentlemen: I am now about to perform the last official act of my position, and before doing so I wish to express my thanks for the confidence which you have reposed in me, and for the manner in which you have assisted me in performing its arduous duties. I can say to you, because you have said it, that I have endeavored to perform the duties impartially, with the sole view of aiding you in your deliberations, and bringing them to a happy termination. I will leave these halls without a single unkind feeling towards any member of this body. The duties assigned to you by the people of this State, were certainly of the greatest importance, more so, perhaps, than any which devolve upon the citizen—the framing of a new Constitution for the government of a great State, perhaps for a long term of years. That you have performed your duties most faithfully, most honestly, I can bear testimony. [Applausei] Whatever else may be said, the truth of that assertion cannot be denied. You have done your work, and it remains now to be submitted to the people, and whatever may be the result—if it be the judgment that your work is good, or that it is ill, we must be satisfied. Gentlemen, my last duty now is to declare this Constitutional Convention adjourned sine die. [Applause.]
Debates and proceedings of the Constitutional convention of the state of California, convened at the city of Sacramento, Saturday, September 28, 1878 March 3, 1879
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Joseph Mandeville v. George Holey/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
The Court are satisfied in this case, that under the law of Virginia, a confession of judgment by the plaintiff in error, in the original suit, is a release of errors.
Judgment affirmed, with costs and damages, at the rate of six per centum per annum.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Joseph Priestley

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Joseph Priestley."
* related authors: Joseph Priestley (1733-1804).
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Joseph Priestley" in Popular Science Monthly, 6 (November 1874)
* "Priestley, Joseph," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
* "Priestley, Joseph," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Priestley," in Biographies of Scientific Men (1912)
* "Priestley, Joseph," in The Encyclopedia Americana, New York: The Encyclopedia Americana Corporation (1920)

### Author pages

* Joseph Priestley (1733–1804), English theologian and philosopher
* Joseph Priestley (1767–1852), English canal manager
# Joseph Schlitz Brewing Company v. Houston Ice & Brewing Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
250 U.S. 28
Joseph Schlitz Brewing Company v. Houston Ice & Brewing Company
Argued: April 24, 1919. --- Decided: May 19, 1919
Mr. Russell Jackson, of Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioner.
Mr. H. M. Garwood, of Houston, Tex., for respondents.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Joseph Schlitz Brewing Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
181 U.S. 584
Joseph Schlitz Brewing Company v. United States
Argued: April 11, 1901. --- Decided: May 20, 1901
This was a petition for a drawback upon hops and barley to the amount of $2,371.35, and upon bottles and corks to the amount of $9,817.97, used in the manufacture of bottled beer for export.
The court of claims made a finding of facts, the substance of which is set forth in the margin, and gave judgment for the first item, but rejected the second, and the claimant appealed.
Findings of Fact.
The following are the facts of the case as found by the court:
I. The claimant is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Wisconsin.
II. Between the 1st day of February, 1893, and the 26th day of October, 1894, the claimant exported from the port of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, bottled beer. The hops, barley, bottles, and corks used in the manufacture of this bottled beer had been imported into the United States from foreign countries, and duties had been paid thereon upon importation. The bottled beer was manufactured by the claimant at Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The imported materials used in the manufacture, when exported, were identified, the quantity of the materials used and the amount of duties paid thereon ascertained, and the fact of the manufacture of the articles in the United States and their exportation were determined under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. The total amount of the duties paid on the materials mentioned so used and exported was $12,189.32, divided as follows: Upon the bottles and corks, $9,817.97; upon the hops and barley, $2,371.35.
III. The Treasury Department has not refused to pay the drawback upon the hops and barley, but such drawback could be paid under the regulaMessrs. Wm. B. King and George A. King for appellant.
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Pradt for appellee
Statement by Mr. Justice Brown:
Mr. Justice Brown delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Joseph Nesbitt v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
186 U.S. 153
JOSEPH A. NESBITT and Charles A. Moore, Appts., v. UNITED STATES and the Sioux Indians.
Argued: April 18, 1902. --- Decided: May 19, 1902
Mrs. Belva A. Lockwood and Mr. W. H. Robeson for appellants.
Assistant Attorney General Thompson and Mr. Lincoln B. Smith for appellees.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Joseph Ritson

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Joseph Ritson."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Ritson, Joseph," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
* "Ritson, Joseph," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Ritson, Joseph," in A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature, by John William Cousin, London: J. M. Dent & Sons (1910)

### See also

* Author:Joseph Ritson
# Kemp v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
369 U.S. 661
Kemp v. United States
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 82 S.Ct. 917.
Mr. Justice CLARK and Mr. Justice HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in the Coppedge case.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kempner v. Churchill/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
75 U.S. 362
Kempner v. Churchill
It has been frequently held that fraud ought not to be presumed, but must be proved. But the evidence of it is almost always circumstantial. Nevertheless, though circumstantial, it produces conviction in the mind often of more force than direct testimony.
It would be a troublesome, as well as an unprofitable task, to examine all the very astute arguments, founded on the large mass of testimony contained in the record, to show that the court below have come to a wrong conclusion. It suffices to say that it sufficiently appears that the evidence before the court fully justified their conclusion.
It is true that mere inadequacy of consideration, unless extremely gross, does not per se prove fraud. But the direct testimony here confirms the fact that Kempner urged the acceptance of his offer to purchase with arguments such as this: 'There is some pretty rough talk in town about you. You had better not delay this matter. You had better let me have the goods and put the money in your pocket, and let the creditors go to the devil.'
The circumstantial evidence amply confirms this direct evidence of fraud.
1st. The false receipts given for full value on Saturday.
2d. The account of stock made out on Sunday.
3d. The removal of the goods into a cellar on Monday.
The defendant's endeavor to prove by experts, that the price given was sufficient, tends only to confirm the correctness of the decree of the Circuit Court, which is
AFFIRMED WITH COSTS.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kendal and Windermere Railway: two letters re-printed from the Morning Post

KENDAL AND WINDERMERE RAILWAY.
TWO LETTERS
RE-PRINTED FROM THE MORNING POST.
REVISED, WITH ADDITIONS.
KENDAL: PRINTED BY R. BRANTHWAITE AND SON.
page
* Sonnet: On the Projected Kendal and Windermere Railway
* Letter 1
* Letter 2
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kemp v. Hults/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
385 U.S. 17
Kemp v. Hults
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kemp v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
369 U.S. 661
Kemp v. United States
A. Kenneth Pye, for petitioner.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack, for the United States.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lavengro/Chapter 61

   the banks of a river—the arid downs—a prospect
Leaving the shepherd, I bent my way in the direction pointed out by him as that in which the most remarkable of the strange remains of which he had spoken lay. I proceeded rapidly, making my way over the downs covered with coarse grass and fern; with respect to the river of which he had spoken, I reflected that, either by wading or swimming, I could easily transfer myself and what I bore to the opposite side. On arriving at its banks, I found it a beautiful stream, but shallow, with here and there a deep place where the water ran dark and still.
Always fond of the pure lymph, I undressed, and plunged into one of these gulfs, from which I emerged, my whole frame in a glow, and tingling with delicious sensations. After conveying my clothes and scanty baggage to the farther side, I dressed, and then with hurried steps bent my course in the direction of some lofty ground; I at length found myself on a high-road, leading over wide and arid downs; following the road for some miles without seeing anything remarkable, I supposed at length that I had taken the wrong path, and wended on slowly and disconsolately for some time, till, having nearly surmounted a steep hill, I knew at once, from certain appearances, that I was near the object of my search. Turning to the right near the brow of the hill, I proceeded along a path which brought me to a causeway leading over a deep ravine, and connecting the hill with another which had once formed part of it, for the ravine was evidently the work of art. I passed over the causeway, and found myself in a kind of gateway which admitted me into a square space of many acres, surrounded on all sides by mounds or ramparts of earth. Though I had never been in such a place before, I knew that I stood within the precincts of what had been a Roman encampment, and one probably of the largest size, for many thousand warriors might have found room to perform their evolutions in that space, in which corn was now growing, the green ears waving in the morning wind.
After I had gazed about the space for a time, standing in the gateway formed by the mounds, I clambered up the mound to the left hand, and on the top of that mound I found myself at a great altitude; beneath, at the distance of a mile, was a fair old city, situated amongst verdant meadows, watered with streams, and from the heart of that old city, from amidst mighty trees, I beheld towering to the sky the finest spire in the world.
And after I had looked from the Roman rampart for a long time, I hurried away, and, retracing my steps along the causeway, regained the road, and, passing over the brow of the hill, descended to the city of the spire.
# Jude the Obscure/Part 4

Part Fourth
AT SHASTON
    "Whoso prefers either Matrimony or other Ordinance before the Good of Man and the plain Exigence of Charity, let him profess Papist, or Protestant, or what he will, he is no better than a Pharisee."—J. Milton.
* Chapter 1
* Chapter 2
* Chapter 3
* Chapter 4
* Chapter 5
* Chapter 6