OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Pieces People Ask For/When Greek met Greek

WHEN GREEK MET GREEK.
Stranger here? Yes, come from Varmount,
Rutland County. You've hearn tell,
Mebbe, of the town of Granville?
You born there? No! Sho! Well, well!
You was born at Granville, was you?
Then you know Elisha Brown,
Him as runs the old meat-market
At the lower end of town?
Well, well, well! Born down in Granville,
And out here, so far away!
Stranger, I'm homesick already,
Though it's but a week to-day
Since I left my good wife standin'
Out there at the kitchen-door,
Sayin' she'd ask God to keep me,
And her eyes were runnin' o'er.
You must know old Albert Withers,
Henry Bull, and Ambrose Cole?
Know them all! And born in Granville?
Well, well, well! God bless my soul!
Sho! You're not old Isaac's nephew,
Isaac Green, down on the flat,
Isaac's oldest nephew,—Henry?
Well, I'd never thought of that!
Have I got a hundred dollars
I could loan you for a minute,
Till you buy a horse at Marcy's?
There's my wallet,—just that in it.
Hold on, though! You have ten, mebbe,
You could let me keep; you see,
I might chance to need a little
Betwixt now and half-past three.
Ten. That's it; you'll owe me ninety;
Bring it round to the hotel.
So you're old friend Isaac's nephew?
Born in Granville! Sho! Well, well!
—What! Policeman! Did you call me?
That a rascal going there?
Well, sir, do you know, I thought so,
And I played him pretty fair;
Hundred-dollar bill I gave him,—
Counterfeit,—and got his ten!
Ten ahead! No! You don't tell me!
This bad too? Sho! Sold again!
# Pieces People Ask For/The Story of Sir Arnulph

THE STORY OF SIR ARNULPH.
[Matt. xxii. 37-39.—"Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself."]
An earnest man, in long-forgotten years,
Relieved the maladies and stanched the tears
Of pining multitudes, who sought his aid
When death their homesteads threatened to invade.   Blest with one only son (a gentle youth,
Trained in the fear of God, and love of truth),
He fondly hoped that Arnulph might aspire
Disease and death to baffle, like his sire.   But the boy, musing gloomily apart,
Avowed at length the impulse of his heart:
"To some calm cloister, father, I would go,
And there serve God." His father answered, "No.   "Thou doest well to wish to serve the Lord,
By thine whole life imperfectly adored;
But choose thy work amid the world, and then
Thou canst serve God, and bless thy fellow-men."   The boy, still yearning to achieve his plan,
Spake: "It were better to serve God than man."
"Pray God for help," the father said, "and he
Will solve the riddle of thy doubt to thee."
So Arnulph to his chamber went, and prayed
That in his doubts the Lord would send him aid.
And, in a vision of the silent night,
A phantom stood before him, clothed in white,—
A form for earth too beautiful and grand,
With crimson roses blooming in each hand.   And Arnulph asked the angel, "Are these flowers
Fresh culled from Eden's amaranthine bowers?"
He answered, "Nay: these offerings are from all
Whom God the doers of his will doth call."
"And can I offer nothing?" sighed the boy.
"May I not also serve the Lord with joy?"
"Surely thou mayest," replied that seraph fair,—
"In my left hand, behold, thy gift I bear."   Then Arnulph said, "I pray thee, tell me why,
In thy left hand the flowers all scentless lie,
But in the right they breathe a gracious smell,
Which long within the haunted sense doth dwell?"   The angel answered with pathetic tone,—
"In my left hand I bear the gifts alone
Of those who worship God the Sire above,
But for his children testify no love;
While these sweet roses, which ne'er grow wan,
Come from the lovers of both God and man."   The vision faded. Arnulph cried, "Alas!
My soul was blind!" And so it came to pass,
That the changed boy a cloister entered not,
But with God's working-men took part and lot.
Gerald Massey.
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 4/The nervous system of the metropolis - Part 1

Part 2→
​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/286 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/287 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/288
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 4/The minister's stratagem

See also the author's follow-up article about the same person, "The fate of Wong-Wan."
​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/618 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/619 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/620 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/621 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/622 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/623 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/624
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 4/The nervous system of the metropolis - Part 2

←Part 1
​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/330 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/331 ​Page:Once a Week Dec 1860 to June 61.pdf/332
# Pindar in English Verse (Way 1922)

* related portals: Odes of Pindar.
* sister projects: Commons category, Wikidata item.
Arthur S. Way's translation of Pindar's Victory Odes into English verse.
Layout 2
PINDAR
IN ENGLISH VERSE.
BY
ARTHUR S. WAY, D.Lit.
AUTHOR OF TRANSLATIONS INTO ENGLISH VERSE OF HOMER'S ILIAD AND ODYSSEY, THE GREEK DRAMATISTS, VIRGIL, LUCRETIUS, HESIOD, SAPPHO, ETC.
London
MACMILLAN & CO., LIMITED
NEW YORK : THE MACMILLAN CO.
1922
Introduction The Olympian Odes Olympian I Olympian II Olympian III Olympian IV Olympian V Olympian VI Olympian VII Olympian VIII Olympian IX Olympian X Olympian XI Olympian XII Olympian XIII Olympian XIV The Pythian Odes Pythian I Pythian II Pythian III Pythian IV Pythian V Pythian VI Pythian VII Pythian VIII Pythian IX Pythian X Pythian XI Pythian XII The Nemean Odes Nemean I Nemean II Nemean III Nemean IV Nemean V Nemean VI Nemean VII Nemean VIII Nemean IX Nemean X Nemean XI The Isthmian Odes Isthmian I Isthmian II Isthmian III Isthmian IV Isthmian V Isthmian VI Isthmian VII
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Pindell v. Mullikin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
66 U.S. 585
Pindell v. Mullikin
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Missouri.
This was a bill in equity brought in the Circuit Court of the United States for the district Missouri, by Richard Pindell, of Kentucky, against Napoleon B. Mullikin, Jerome B. Mullikin, Charles B. Wiggins, and Virginia, his wife, John R. Shepley, William H. McPherson, P. Dexter Tiffany, Samuel Willi, James Clements, jr., and David H. Armstrong, citizens of the State of Missouri.
The complainant prayed to have decre d to him fifty arpents of land in the neighborhood of St. Louis, and deduced his title from John R. Sloan, the sole heir and legal representative of one John Sloan, to whom the land claimed was alleged to have been conveyed by David Musick. The defendants had been in possession of it for more than twenty years before the filing of the bill.
John Sloan, the father of the plaintiff's grantor, died in 1818, without having recorded any deed from the previous owner to himself. It was supposed to have been lost as early as the death of Sloan. No steps were taken for forty years to assert any claim under it. According to the allegations of the bill, the representatives of Sloan knew all the time of his title to the land, yet-they commenced no suit at all, and their assignee only after a lapse of forty years. J. R. Sloan, the son under whom appellant claimed title, came of age in 1834, and knew as early as 1838 that Mullikin claimed portions of the tract in controversy. It was alleged that he took professional advice on the subject in 1838, but it was not until twenty years after that time, and twenty-four years after he came of age, that any suit was instituted.
No counsel appeared for appellant.
Mr. Shepley, of Missouri, for appellees. Laches, much less flagrant than this, will prevent a court of equity from granting relief even in a clear case. 2 Story Eq. Jur., (7th ed.,) Sec. 1520, p. 889, note 4, and cases there cited; Holt vs. Rogers, (8 Peters, 420 et al.;) Patte vs. Carroll, (8 Cranch, 471;) Moore vs. Blake, (1 Ball & P., 69;) Boone vs. Missouri Iron Co., (17 How., 340.)
Mr. Justice CATRON.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pindell v. Mullikin/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
66 U.S. 585
Pindell v. Mullikin
Pindell filed his bill against the respondents and others, to have decreed to him, as assignee of John R. Sloan, fifty acres of land adjoining the city of St. Louis. The respondents rely on the act of limitations as a defence, (among others,) alleging that they have been in adverse possession of the land for which they are used for more than twenty years before the suit was brought.
John R. Sloan became of age in 1834; the bill so alleges. The land was confirmed to the father of the respondents, under whom they claim as heirs, by the act of Congress of July 4th, 1836, and the bill was filed in January, 1857, more than twenty years after the legal title was vested by the confirmation.
The bill admits that Mullikin's heirs hold the legal title, and they prove that a division of the land confirmed took place among various owners, and that about ten arpents of it were allotted to Mullikin, the ancestor. This occurred in 1836; that immediately after the partition, Mullikin took possession of the land allotted to him, and he and his heirs have held it in possession ever since.
The claim set up by the bill is barred by twenty years' adverse possession. If, however, this defence was not conclusive of the controversy, our opinion is, that no sufficient evidence that the contract alleged to have once existed is proved; and that the decree below dismissing the bill was also proper for want of proof to sustain its allegations.
Decree of the Circuit Court affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pine Hill Coal Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
259 U.S. 191
Pine Hill Coal Company v. United States
Argued: Jan. 20, 1922. --- Decided: May 29, 1922
Mr. Henry S. Drinker, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 191-193 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Riter, for the United States.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pine Needles

1912.
O little lances, dipt in grey, And set in order straight and clean, How exquisitely clear and keen Your points against the cobalt day !
Attesting what consummate art Ye fringe the limpid firmament, O little lances, keenly sent To pierce with beauty to the heart.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1961, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 62 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
Supreme Court of the United States
405 U.S. 156
Papachristou et al. v. City of Jacksonville
Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
No. 70-5030 Argued: December 8, 1971 --- Decided: February 24, 1972
The Jacksonville vagrancy ordinance, under which petitioners were convicted, is void for vagueness, in that it "fails to give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice that his contemplated conduct is forbidden by the statute," it encourages arbitrary and erratic arrests and convictions, it makes criminal activities that by modern standards are normally innocent, and it places almost unfettered discretion in the hands of the police. Pp. 161-171.
236 So. 2d 141, reversed.
DOUGLAS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which all Members joined except POWELL and REHNQUIST, JJ., who took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Samuel S. Jacobson argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners.
T. Edward Austin Jr., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were James C. Rinaman, Jr., and J. Edward Wall.
# Papa above!

Papa above! Regard a Mouse O'erpowered by the Cat! Reserve within thy kingdom A "Mansion" for the Rat!
Snug in seraphic Cupboards To nibble all the day While unsuspecting Cycles Wheel solemnly away!
# Papal Jurisdiction Act 1560

Concerning the jurisdictioun and autoritie of the bischope of Rome callit the Paip
In the Parliament haldin at edinburgh the tent day of Julij the yeir of God JmVc&lx yeiris and thairefter continewit to the first day of august nixt thaireftir following with continewatioune of dayis vpoun the tuenty foir day of the said monethe of august The thre estaitis then being present vnderstanding that the Jurisdictioune and autoritie of the bischope of Rome callit the paip vsit within this realme in tymes bipast hes bene verray hurtful and preiudiciall to our soueranis autoritie and commone weill of this realme Thairfoir hes statute and ordanit that the bischope of Rome haif na Jurisdictioun nor autoritie within this realme in tymes cuming And that nane of our saidis soueranis subiectis of this realme sute or desire in ony tyme heireftir title or rycht be the said bischope of Rome or his sait to ony thing within this realme vnder the panis of barratrye That is to say proscriptioune banischement and neuir to bruke honour office nor dignitie within this realme And the controvenaris heirof tobe callit befoir the Justice or his deputis or befoir the lordis of sessioun and pvnist thairfoir conforme to the Lawis of this realme And the furnissaris of thame with fynance of money and purchessaris of thair title of rycht or manteanaris or defendaris of thame sall incur the same panis And that na bischop nor vther prelat of this realme vse ony Jurisdictioun in tymes to cum be the said bischop of Romeis autoritie vnder the pane foirsaid

## Wikisource footnotes

* ↑ The short title given by the Statute Law Revision (Scotland) Act 1964 (c. 80), Sch. 2

## Source

* The text from statute law database
This work is in the public domain worldwide because it is one of the following types of legislation in the United Kingdom or its predecessor states, and received Royal Assent or the approval of HM in Council (as applicable) before 1974:
* Act of Parliament
* Act of the Scottish Parliament
* Measure of the National Assembly for Wales
* Act of Senedd Cymru (formerly known as an Act of the National Assembly for Wales)
* Act of the Northern Ireland Assembly
* Measure of the General Synod of the Church of England
See section 164 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Paper-Bag Cases

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
105 U.S. 766
Paper-Bag Machine Company v. Nixon
APPEALS from the Circuit Court of the United States of the Southern District of Ohio.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. George Harding and Mr. John R. Bennett for the Paper-Bag Machine Company.
Mr. James Morse and Mr. E. W. Kittredge, contra.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pirate Gold

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
"Although the story is a study of character rather than a chronicle of adventures, there is stirring incident to quicken the pulse, and one catches charming glimpses of the Boston of 1854 and thereabouts, when Wendell Phillips fired the abolitionists, and it took "the whole State militia" to accomplish the return of one runaway slave to his master. The humour, which abounds, is of the wholesome, full-blooded kind." —From a review in The Bookman, July 1896
PIRATE GOLD
BY
F. J. STIMSON (J. S. OF DALE)
BOSTON AND NEW YORK HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY The Riverside Press, Cambridge 1896
Copyright, 1895 and 1896, By HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN & CO.
Copyright, 1896 By F. J. STIMSON.
All rights reserved.
The Riverside Press, Cambridge, Mass., U. S. A. Electrotyped and Printed by H. O. Houghton & Co.
CONTENTS.
* PAGE
* PART ONE: DISCOVERY1
* PART TWO: ROBBERY75
* PART THREE: RECOVERY137
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1942, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 81 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pirate Gold/Part 1/Chapter 2
#### II.

A very real pirate was De Soto. None of your Captain Kidds, who make one voyage or so before they are hanged, and even then find time to bury kegs of gold in every marshy and uncomfortable spot from Maine to Florida. No, no. De Soto had better uses for his gold than that. Commonly he traveled with it; and thus he even brought it to Boston with him on that unlucky voyage in 1829, when Mr. James Bowdoin was kind enough to take charge of it for him. One wonders what he meant to do with a bag of gold in Boston in 1829.
This happened on Thursday, the 24th of June. It was the day after Mr. James Bowdoin's (or Mr. James's, as Jamie McMurtagh and others in the bank always called him; it was his father who was properly Mr. James Bowdoin, and his grandfather who was Mr. Bowdoin)—after Mr. James's Commencement Day; and it was the day after Mr. James's engagement as junior clerk in the counting-room; and it was the day after Mr. James's engagement to be married; and it was the day but one after Mr. James's class's supper at ​Mr. Porter's tavern in North Cambridge. Ah, they did things quickly in those days; ils savoient vivre.
They had made him a Bachelor of Arts, and a Master of Arts he had made himself by paying for that dignity, and all this while the class punch was fresher in his memory than Latin quantities; for these parchment honors were a bit overwhelming to one who had gone through his college course non clam, sed vi et precario, as his tutor courteously phrased it. And then he had gotten out of his college gown into a beautiful blue frock coat and white duck trousers, and driven into town and sought for other favors, more of flesh and blood, carried his other degree with a rush—and Miss Abigail Dowse off to drive with him. And that evening Mr. James Bowdoin had said to him, "James!"
"Yes, sir," said Mr. James.
"Now you've had your four years at college, and I think it's time you should be learning something."
"Yes, sir," said Mr. James.
"So I wish you to come down to the counting-room at nine o'clock and sort the letters."
​"Yes, sir," said Mr. James.
Mr. James Bowdoin looked at him suspiciously over his spectacles. "At eight o'clock; do you hear?"
"I hear, sir," said Mr. James.
Mr. James Bowdoin lost his temper at once. "Oh, you do, do you?" said he. "You don't want to go to Paris, to Rome,—to make the grand tour like a gentleman, in short, as I did long before I was your age?"
"No, sir," said Mr. James.
"Then, sir, by gad," said Mr. James Bowdoin, "you may come down at half past seven—and—and—sweep out the office!"
# Pirate Gold/Part 1

Page not included in physical book. Added here for convenience in navigating.
PART I: DISCOVERY
* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
* Chapter VII
* Chapter VIII
* Chapter IX
* Chapter X
* Chapter XI
* Chapter XII
# Pirate Gold/Part 1/Chapter 1

PIRATE GOLD

### PART ONE: DISCOVERY.
#### I.

It consisted of a few hundred new American eagles and a few times as many Spanish doubloons; for pirates like good broad pieces, fit to skim flat-spun across the waves, or play pitch-and-toss with for men's lives or women's loves; they give five-dollar pieces or thin British guineas to the boy who brings them drink, and silver to their bootblacks, priests, or beggars.
It was contained—the gold—in an old canvas bag, a little rotten and very brown and mouldy, but tied at the neck by a piece of stout and tarnished braid of gold. It had no name or card upon it nor letters on its side, and it lay for nearly thirty years high on a shelf, in an old chest, behind three tiers of tins of papers, in the deepest corner of the ​vault of the old building of the Old Colony Bank.
Yet this money was passed to no one's credit on the bank's books, nor was it carried as part of the bank's reserve. When the old concern took out its national charter, in 1863, it did not venture or did not remember to claim this specie as part of the reality behind its greenback circulation. It was never merged in other funds, nor converted, nor put at interest. The bag lay there intact, with one brown stain of blood upon it, where Romolo de Soto had grasped it while a cutlass gash was fresh across his hand. And so it was carried, in specie, in its original package: "Four hundred and twenty-three American eagles, and fifteen hundred and fifty-six Spanish doubloons; deposited by —— De Soto, June twenty-fourth, eighteen hundred and twenty-nine; for the benefit of whom it may concern."
And it concerned very much two people with whom our narration has to do,—one, James McMurtagh, our hero; the other, Mr. James Bowdoin, then called Mr. James, member of the firm of James Bowdoin's Sons. For De Soto, having escaped with his neck, took good pains never to call for his money.
# Poems (Eckley)/A Martyr's Grave

"AMANTO FILIO DVLCISSIMO QVI VIXIT ANNIS DVOBVS. ET. D. X.V. N PACE."
Rome, 1861.
* ↑ An inscription in the Catacombs of St. Agnese, on the slab of a child's grave; a martyr of two years old.
* ↑ In the year 1716, the body of a holy martyr, named Martiria, was discovered in the Catacombs of St. Calisto. The Ampulla which once contained her blood still remained, and the inscription to the Roman lady was well preserved. These bones retained for a long period the same wonderful fragrance as had been observed before by eminent savants, on opening fresh tombs in the Catacombs of Rome. Among many eminent archæologists who were witnesses of this extraordinary phenomenon, were Signori Canonica, Raimondo, Binetti, and Romani. The same odour was also perceived by many persons in a street near the same cemetery, as they were stopping to pray near some tombs of saints. But laying aside all that might be attributed to a miraculous and supernatural fragrance, it might in some cases be produced by aromatic anointments used in embalming the martyred dead, even as they anointed the body of the Redeemer: though more frequently the bodies of Martyrs were hurried into their last resting places before there was time for the expensive rite of embalming.—Translated from "Boldetti's Roma Sotteranea."—[S. M. E.]
# Poems (Eckley)/A Welcome

October, 1858.
# Poems (Eckley)/A Voice

1861.
# Poems (Eckley)/A Wish

Courmajeur, 1861,
# Poems (Eckley)/A Walk in the Cascine

(FLORENCE.) To H. B. S.