OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Reavis v. Fianza

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
215 U.S. 16
Reavis v. Fianza
Argued: April 26, 27, 1909. --- Decided: November 1, 1909
Messrs. Frederic R. Coudert, Howard Thayer Kingsbury, and Paul Fuller for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 16-19 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Henry E. Davis for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 19-21 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rebecca

This work is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of their rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law. You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
Rebecca by Letitia Elizabeth Landon (L. E. L.)
From Heath’s Book of Beauty, 1833 Compiled by Peter J. Bolton
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rebecca Snyder email on USA v. Khadr -- date redacted -- 1

From pages 172-173 of http://www3.thestar.com/static/PDF/080502_child_soldier_motion_release.pdf
The first page of this email has been entirely redacted.
ument on the child soldier motion, DOJ attorney Mr. Oldham stated that trial counsel's team could not find the reference to the JDA in the Operational Law Handbook. Trial counsel was referring to page 13, para. 5(d)(5) of the Motion to Dismiss which stated that "Within the military, the JDA is understood as applying to the prosecution of anyone under eighteen who is not a member of U.S. forces and commits a criminal act overseas," and to page 14, para. 2(g)(1)(B)(i)(c) of the Defense Reply to the Government's Response, which stated the same proposition. The citation in our briefs is correct and appears as follows: International and Operational Law Department, The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School, Operational Law Handbook, JA 422, 139 (2006). 2. Attached please find a copy of page 139, confirming the citation in the Defense briefing as to the applicability of the JDA at para. 5. It states in relevant part, "Juveniles are subject to the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 5031-5042." 3. At the following link, the text of the Handbook can be found in full: http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/law/oplaw_hdbk.pdf. V/r Ms. Snyder         CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachments may constitute confidential, attorney-client information and work product that is legally privileged. This information is the property of the individual attorney and respective client. If you are not the intended recipient of this information, any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by calling the above-numbers.
# Reasons for not eating Animal Food

First appearing in his own publication Monthly Magazine, Phillips' sixteen "Reasons for not eating animal food" expanded to twenty two for inclusion in his 1826 work, entitled Golden Rules for Social Philosophy. For a comparison of the text, see information on the talk page.
* "The Writer's Reasons for not Eating Animal Food" (1811) appearing in The Medical and Physical Journal
* "Reasons for not eating animal food" (1814) original pamphlet
* "The Author's Reasons for not Eating Animal Food" (1826) from Golden Rules of Social Philosophy
# Punch/Volume 147/Issue 3818/India for the King

​ INDIA FOR THE KING!
# Punch/Volume 147/Issue 3818/His First Victory

HIS FIRST VICTORY.
"Yes, I like the kit," she said, "and I'm glad you came to show yourself, because I've got a little present for you." He winced.
"I ought to say," he remarked, "that I have already received five barbed-wirecutters, three vacuum flasks, eleven comforters, six writing blocks———"
"Oh, but this won't take up any room," and she held out a woollen helmet of the popular colour.
"Thanks awfully," he replied, drawing back, "but I never wear them."
"Of course you don't," she said; "they're not meant for tennis tournaments or the opera, but for the campaigner whose lodging is on the cold bare ground. In fact when once he gets it on he never wants to take it off again."
"From the look of it," he remarked, "it will be a case of Hobson's choice. You've underrated the size."
"I took your measurements last week," she said coldly.
"But that was before I joined the colours. You forgot to allow for subsequent developments."
"In any case the wool stretches," she observed. Are you going to try it on?"
"It will play the very deuce with my hair," he objected.
"Very well," she said. "Dick shall have it."
"Never," he exclaimed, and snatching up the woollen object, began to ram his sleek head into the small aperture at the bottom.
Halfway through, apparently yielding to panic, he sought to return to fresh air and the light of day, but her hands ruthlessly seized the elaborate crochet edging, and pulled and tugged it down mercilessly towards his shoulders until his distorted features appeared at the hold in front with a pop, and she clapped her hands in delight.
"It fits you like a glove," she cried, and though your nose is a bit red you look quite handsome."
"I'm being strangled," he gasped, clutching at his throat; "take it off!"
"In time of war," she observed, "we all have to put up with a little inconvenience. I shall soon be living on turnips, for instance, and you know how I hate them."
With a strange gurgling in his throat, he collapsed on the Chesterfield. His face grew purple, his eyes bulged and rolled, his veins swelled, his head dropped forward. She grew alarmed.
"Are you really choking?" she exclaimed. "Here, take your hands away. Let me help! Good gracious Darling! Oh! Whatever shall I do?" She sprang for her scissors, and in a moment the helmet lay on the carpet hopelessly mutilated.
"Thanks," he replied, smoothing his ruffled hair. "In another minute the Germans would have missed their billet."
"Neither you nor Dick will be able to wear it now," she said, and her lip trembled.
"Dick won't," he said, "and as a matter of fact I'm going to."
"How can you?" And there was a catch in her voice.
"Not on my head perhaps, but on my heart—or rather," he added, slipping a khaki arm round her, "on the place where my heart used to be."
Next morning, on parade, his chest measurement was the object of universal envy.
# Punch/Volume 147/Issue 3818/Infantry

INFANTRY.
# Punch/Volume 147/Issue 3818/How Will You Take It?

HOW WILL YOU TAKE IT?
I sometimes doubt whether my bank takes me really seriously. Not that it isn't businesslike. They let me know to the minute when I have overdrawn my account by five and elevenpence; but they cash my cheques with a certain air of patronage, whereas, if you look at things properly, the patronage is all on my side.
Every Saturday morning a man comes to my bank to cash a cheque for a hundred and fifty pounds (How he gets through all that money in a week I have never had the courage to ask him.) Every Saturday morning I come to my bank to cash a cheque for—well, whatever it happens to be, you know.
The trouble is that we nearly always coincide; only the other man always seems to coincide first. And, as he takes his hundred and fifty on a selective principle, I am beginning to know from bitter experience what he will ask for and how long he will take to get served. He begins with a note for fifty and going on with fifty in fivers. Then he has twenty sovereigns, and so on, down to the pound in copper. He and the cashier chat airily the while of cabbages and kaisers. Then at last goes away full, and the cashier turns to me.
The Saturday before last I ventured to ask whether, if the hundred-and-fifty pounder always insisted on arriving two seconds before me, it wouldn't be possible to cash my cheque, which is a simple little thing, in one of the intervals during which, after sending to the cellars for more gold, they relapse into easy conversation; or, alternatively, if it was really necessary to pay a customer exactly the complicated bunches of monies he demanded; and, if so, whether it couldn't be done any quicker.
The answer proving unsatisfactory I determined to arrive earlier last Saturday. I made no mistake. I hung about the door of the bank for a quarter of an hour till I saw my rival approach. I came in just ahead of him, and presented my cheque. The cashier received it with his usual little smile and turned it over. Then his usual little smile left him and he set sadly to work.
The hundred-and-fifty pound man chafed and stamped his feet behind me for ten minutes, while I gloated. It was my day—my Tag.
I think you may like to know just in what shape I demanded the payment of my modest fifty shillings:—
| £ | s. | d. |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | in one pound notes. |
| 0 | 10 | 0 | in ten shilling notes. |
| 0 | 10 | 0 | in gold. |
| 0 | 5 | 0 | in shilling postal orders. |
| 0 | 2 | 0 | in threepenny bits. |
| 0 | 0 | 9 1/2 | in halfpennies. |
| 0 | 1 | 10 1/4 | in farthings. |
| 0 | 0 | 4 | in silver, if possible (otherwise stamps). |
| 0 | 0 | 0 1/4 | in pins. |
| 2 | 10 | 0 |
# Punch/Volume 147/Issue 3818/Our Overburdened Heroes

OUR OVERBURDENED HEROES.
"The K. of K."
SMOKER'S COMPANION
Comprising two pipes, cigar holder, cigarette holder, pipe cleaner, patent lighter, smoker's knife, pouch with silver plate for monogram, match box, and burning glass. All compactly contained in crocodile leather case.
Price Three Guineas.
Should be in every officer's kit.
HAMMERSTEIN AND PUMMELOFF.
Genuine Offer to all Soldiers on Foreign Service.
Superb Boudoir Grand Pianos
At 25 per cent. reduction.
Will just fit into a Bell tent. With removable legs.
Can be also used as a bed or a billiard table.
The Combined REVOLVER, FLASK & TIN-OPENER.
Occupies no room. Invaluable in Camp and Action.
Price £10.
Should be in every knapsack.
GNU-BOOT-EASE.
The invaluable Remedy on Long Marches.
One Shilling per packet.
Should be in every Soldier's knapsack.
To all who are going to the Front.
Don't start without one of
DIPPER'S PANDEMONIUM GRAMOSCOPES.
Enlivens the Bivouac. Promotes Optimism.
Price, during continuance of hostilities, 50 gns.; with special truck, 250 gns.
THE A1 PORTABLE KITCHENER.
With this compact and serviceable rango a delicious hot meal can be cooked in a few minutes in whatever way is wished—by roasting, boiling, baking or grilling.
Total weight, 8 lbs.
Price Four Guineas.
Should be in every Soldier's knapsack.
THE "ROBERTS" TOILET SET.
Comprising 1 bottle refreshing dentifrice, 1 cake scented soap, 1 bottle Eau de Cologne (warranted made in England), 1 tube face-cream. Neatly packed in art case.
One Guinea.
A Charming Present for our Brave Lads or the French.
The "IAN HAMILTON" SHOULDER BALM.
For bruises caused by recoiling rifles.
5s. Tins at half price to every bonâ-fide soldier.
No knapsack should be without it.
Important Notice.
Messrs. PUDELHEIMER and JOSKINS, the Famous Art Dealers,
Offer their Entire Stock of Horrifying Post-Impressionist and Futurist Pictures and Sculpture
To Officers serving Abroad or on Home Defence.
No reasonable offer refused.
No enemy can stand against them.
The Gorey Gallery, Bond Street.
# Punch/Volume 147/Issue 3818/God (and the Women) our Shield

GOD (AND THE WOMEN) OUR SHIELD! STUDY OF A GERMAN GENTLEMAN GOING INTO ACTION.
# Roberts v. LaVallee/Dissent Harlan

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Harlan
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 40
Roberts v. LaVallee
Mr. Justice HARLAN, dissenting.
As the Court states, petitioner was told that if he wished a transcript of his preliminary hearing he would have to pay for it. The Court fails to add, however, that petitioner and his counsel were both present at the preliminary hearing, that they were furnished a free transcript of the grand jury testimony of the state witness in question but made no use of this transcript at trial, and that at no time has petitioner suggested any use to which the preliminary hearing transcript could have been put, although he is in a position to know what it contains.
The decisions cited in the majority opinion fall far short of declaring that any document related to the criminal process, no matter how demonstrably trivial its significance, must be supplied free to indigents simply because the State is willing to make it available to others able to pay for it. Rather than formulate such an undiscriminating rule, a rule that predictably may lead to a narrowing of the availability of documents that a State is not constitutionally required to furnish to any criminal defendant, I would at least undertake to examine the importance of the particular document in question.
This examination is not necessary in the present case, however, for, as the Court's opinion recognizes, there exists an adequate basis under state law for affording petitioner the relief that he seeks here. Believing, as did the Court of Appeals, that federal courts should not unnecessarily interfere with the administration of justice in state courts, particularly when this involves reaching federal constitutional questions unnecessarily, see Harrison v. NAACP, 360 U.S. 167, 79 S.Ct. 1025, 3 L.Ed.2d 1152, I would affirm the decision below.
In addition, in the circumstances depicted by this record, I consider the Court's disposition of this case improvident even under the postulates of its opinion. I understand the Court to require the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus, and hence the setting aside of the state conviction, without any further investigation of whether the constitutional error now found to have been committed by the state courts actually prejudiced this defendant. Since there appears every likelihood that further examination would reveal that the denial of a preliminary hearing transcript to this petitioner was 'harmless beyond a reasonable doubt,' Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, at 24, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705, the case should have been sent back to the Court of Appeals with instruction to remand to the District Court for a hearing to determine the possibility of prejudice. Cf. Roberts v. United States, 389 U.S. 18, 88 S.Ct. 1, 19 L.Ed.2d 18. Due respect for state criminal processes requires at least this much.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Roberts v. Reilly

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
116 U.S. 80
Roberts v. Reilly
Argued: December 14, 1885. --- Decided: his petition to the judge of the district court for the Southern district of Georgia, and filed the same in the office of the clerk, alleging that he was illegally restrained of his liberty by the appellee, Reilly, who claimed to be acting as an agent of the state of New York, and as such to hold the petitioner, under color of the authority of the United States, by virtue of an arrest made in pursuance of an executive warrant issued by the governor of Georgia, on a requisition from the governor of New York, reciting that the petitioner had been indicted in the state of New York, and was a fugitive from the justice of the latter state He averred that the custody by which he was restrained of his liberty was illegal, for various reasons assigned, and prayed for the writ of habeas corpus The writ was issued as prayed for, and duly served, and thereupon an amendment to the petition was filed, as follows: 'And now comes the said William S Roberts, and, by leave of the court first had, amends said petition, and says that he is restrained of his liberty, in violation of a law of the United States, viz, the act of February 12, 1793, (section 5178 of the Revised Statutes of the United States,) in this: that it appears from the record, now here to your honor shown, upon which the executive warrant under which he is now restrained issued, that the crime with which he is charged was committed in the state of Georgia; that the papers accompanying the demand of the governor of New York are not authenticated, as required by that act; that it nowhere appears that the relator was personally within the limits of the state of New York at the time when said alleged crime is stated to have been committed; that it nowhere appears that any evidence was before the governor of New York, at the time he issued his demand, that relator was personally within the limits of New York state when the crime is alleged to have been committed'

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Roberts v. Lewis

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Roberts v. Lewis."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Roberts v. Lewis (144 U.S. 653)
* Roberts v. Lewis (153 U.S. 367)
See also Lewis v. Roberts.
# Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Moore

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
231 U.S. 560
Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Moore
Argued: November 6, 1913. --- Decided: December 22, 1913
Messrs. Eugene R. Black, Sanders McDaniel, and Edward D. Duffield for petitioner.
Messrs. Minter Wimberly, Alexander Akerman, and Jesse Harris for respondent.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Prudential Insurance Company v. Benjamin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
328 U.S. 408
Prudential Insurance Company v. Benjamin
Argued: March 8-11, 1946. --- Decided: June 3, 1946
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the State of South Carolina.
Mr. Joseph W. Henderson, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from page 409 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. T. C. Callison and David W. Robinson, both of Columbia, S.C., for appellee.
Mr. C. H. Foust, of Columbia City, Ind., for the State of Indiana and other States, as amici curiae, by special leave of Court.
Mr. Justice RUTLEDGE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Royal Naval Biography/Parry, Howard Lewis

Layout 2
HOWARD LEWIS PARRY, Esq. [Commander.]
Passed his examination, at Portsmouth, in June 1814; obtained his first commission on the 10th Mar. 1815; and was advanced to his present rank, Feb. 10th, 1832, “for gallant conduct and severe wounds received in the coastguard service.”
This officer has a pension of five shillings per diem for his wounds. In 1834, King Louis Phillipe sent him a gold medal, for his exertions in saving the crew of a French fishing vessel, wrecked off Rye in 1831.
# Royal Naval Biography/Parson, John

Layout 2
JOHN PARSON, Esq. [Commander.]
Was made a lieutenant on the 1st Nov. 1807. During the latter part of the late French war, he served under Captain Sir E. T. Troubridge, in the Armide frigate. He was senior lieutenant of the Granicus, Captain William F. Wise, at the battle of Algiers; and, for his conduct on that occasion, promoted to the rank of commander, Sept, 16th, 1816.
# Royal Naval Biography/Parrey, Edward Iggulden

Layout 2
EDWARD IGGULDEN PARREY, Esq. [Commander.]
Was made a lieutenant into the Liverpool 50, Captain (now Sir Francis A.) Collier, on the East India station, Nov. 28th, 1820; and appointed to the Primrose sloop. Commander T. S. Griffinhoofe, fitting out for the African station, Aug. 9th, 1827. The following is taken from the “Hampshire Telegraph:”
“Letters from Sierra Leone, dated Mar. 2d, 1829, state that his ​Majesty’s ship Primrose was then lying there, waiting the event of the trial of a galliot (formerly the yacht of Alderman Sir William Curtis), which a pinnace under the command of Lieut. Parrey, first of the Primrose, had captured in the River Cachan, with thirty-eight slaves on board. This active officer had, on the previous day to the capture of the galliot, taken a Portuguese vessel of four guns and forty men, with two hundred and twenty-five slaves, by boarding. This vessel was formerly the Saucy Jack, American privateer. Lieut. Parrey proceeded up the River Noonaz, where he found two schooners, one French and one Spanish, quite ready for slaves. He also found there an English brig, the Lochiel, of Liverpool, and what is remarkable, without a living soul on board, the captain, mate, and all her crew having been discovered below dead. He consequently, with much praiseworthy exertions, brought her down the river, which is a dangerous one, and without a pilot, to the Primrose, which ship carried her to Sierra Leone, where her agent had allotted to the Primrose a salvage of 190l.”
Lieutenant Parrey was advanced to the rank of commander Feb. 10th, 1830.
# Royal Naval Biography/Parsons, Robert White

Layout 2
ROBERT WHITE PARSONS, Esq. [Captain of 1828.]
Was made a lieutenant on the 11th April 1806; and commanded the boarders of the Diana frigate, Captain William Ferris, at the capture of the French national brig Teaser, near the mouth of the Gironde, Aug. 25th, 1811. He subsequently served in the Armada 74, Captain Charles Grant, and Boyne 98, bearing the flag of Lord Exmouth. On the 7th Nov. 1810, he was promoted to the rank of commander; and in July 1825, appointed to the Dispatch sloop, fitting out for the Irish station, where he captured a smuggling lugger, under French colours, with 400 bales of tobacco on board. His commission as captain bears date Nov. 11th, 1828.
Agent.– J. Copland, Esq.
# Royal Naval Biography/Parrey, Robert

Layout 2
ROBERT PARREY, Esq. [Commander.]
Was made a lieutenant on the 2d Nov. 1790, and promoted to his present rank in Aug. 1806.
# Royal Naval Biography/Pasco, John

Layout 2
JOHN PASCO, Esq. [Post-Captain of 1811.]
Obtained a lieutenant’s commission in 1795; and was badly wounded when serving on board Nelson’s flag-ship, at the ever memorable battle of Trafalgar. His promotion to the rank of commander took place Dec. 24, 1805.
Towards the close of 1808, Captain Pasco was appointed ​to the Hindostan 50, armed en flûte, in which ship he sailed for New South Wales, about May, 1809. He subsequently commanded the Tartarus 20, and continued in her after his advancement to post rank, April 3, 1811. In 1815, he was successively appointed to the Rota 38, and Lee 20 ; the latter ship he paid off at Plymouth, in Sept. 1818.
Captain Pasco enjoys a pension of 250l. per annum for his wounds.
Agent.– Sir Francis M. Ommanney.