OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# History of Iowa From the Earliest Times to the Beginning of the Twentieth Century/4/Hoyt Sherman

[Hoyt Sherman]
​ HOYT SHERMAN, son of Charles R. Sherman, Judge of the Supreme Court of Ohio, was born in Lancaster County, November 1, 1827, and is the younger brother of John Sherman, the distinguished Ohio statesman, and of General William T. Sherman of Civil War fame. Until eighteen years of age, Hoyt's time was divided between school and the printing office. In the spring of 1848 he came to Fort Des Moines, Iowa, then far out on the western frontier. In 1849 he was admitted to the bar and began to practice law, and also engaged in real estate business. In March of that year he was appointed by President Taylor postmaster of Des Moines, holding that position until the inauguration of President Pierce, when he resigned and was elected clerk of the District Court. In 1854 he was the senior member of the banking house of Hoyt Sherman & Co., and upon the establishment of the State Bank of Iowa he became cashier of the Des Moines branch and was one of the directors on part of the State to supervise the system and guard the public interests. When the Civil War began Mr. Sherman was appointed by President Lincoln paymaster in the Union army with the rank of major, holding the position for three years. He was one of the organizers of the Equitable Life Insurance Company of Iowa and for many years its general manager. That institution ​owes much of its stability and high standing to the fine executive ability and unquestioned integrity of Major Sherman. In 1866, Major Sherman was a member of the House of the Eleventh General Assembly where he was chairman of the committee on railroads and a member of the committee of ways and means. In 1886 he was one of the founders of the Pioneer Lawmakers' Association and has always been one of its most influential members, serving as president and long a member of the executive committee. He has contributed valuable historical articles to the Annals of Iowa on “Early Banking in Iowa,” and on the “State Bank of Iowa.” For many years he was the executive officer of the Associated Charities of Des Moines.
# Helena

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Helena."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, travel guide, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Helena, ~412 BCE Greek drama by Euripides
* Helena, 1910 poem by Ella Wheeler Wilcox
# Helena's Path

Helena's Path has an outward framework of actuality, the atmosphere of present-day English country life; yet into this he has infused a certain spirit of old-time chivalry and homage that gives to his whole picture something of the grace and charm of a Watteau landscape. The whole theme of the volume, which is scarcely more than a novelette, concerns itself with a right of way. The hero's estates lie somewhere on the east coast of England; but between his land and the strip of beach where he and his fathers before him have for generations been in the habit of bathing lies the property which the heroine has recently purchased; and, unaware of any right of way, she closes up the gate through "Helena's Path" which it is his habit to pass for his daily swim. … —Extracted from a review by Frederic Taber Cooper: "The Convention of Romance and Some Recent Books" in The Bookman Nov. 1907
HELENA'S PATH.
By ANTHONY HOPE.
"Flew over her head."
* I. Ambrose, Lord Lynborough
* II. Largely Topographical
* III. Of Law and Natural Rights
* IV. The Message of a Padlock
* V. The Beginning of War
* VI. Exercise Before Breakfast
* VII. Another Wedge!
* VIII. The Marchesa Moves
* IX. Lynborough Drops a Catch
* X. In the Last Resort!
* XI. An Armistice
* XII. An Embassage
* XIII. The Feast of St. John Baptist
Copyright, 1907, by A. H. Hawkins, in the United States of America. Acting rights reserved and protected as required by law.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1933, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 90 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# I know not how to find the Spring

"I know not how to find the Spring"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1904), "I know not how to find the Spring" in Scribner's Magazine (March 1904).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1904), "I know not how to find the Spring" in Mine and Thine (1904).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "I know not how to find the Spring" in Poems II.

## References

* ↑ View this version at Google Books.
# I laid me down upon a bank

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
From Notebook p. 115, reversed. See also: Songs and Ballads.

#### 1st reading:

(Edited text)
I laid me down upon a bank
Where love lay sleeping.
I heard among the rushes dank
Weeping, Weeping.
5Then I went to the heath & the wild To the thistles & thorns of the waste
And they told me how they were beguil'd
Driven out, & compeld to be chaste.
________________________________________

#### 2nd reading:

(The original text)
I laid me down upon a bank
Where love lay sleeping
I heard among the rushes dank
Weeping Weeping
5Then I went to the heath & the wild To the thistles & thorns of the waste
And they told me how they were beguild
Driven out & compeld to be chaste
________________________________________

## Notes

* ↑ "Blake Complete Writings", ed. Geoffrey Keynes, pub. OUP 1966/85, p. 162.
* ↑ "The Complete Poetry & Prose of William Blake", ed. by David V. Erdman, Anchor Books, 1988, p. 468.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# I know my soul hath power to know all things

I know my soul hath power to know all things, Yet she is blind and ignorant in all: I know I'm one of Nature's little kings, Yet to the least and vilest things am thrall.   I know my life's a pain and but a span; I know my sense is mock'd in ev'rything; And, to conclude, I know myself a Man, Which is a proud and yet a wretched thing.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# I know of people in the Grave

I know of people in the Grave Who would be very glad To know the news I know tonight If they the chance had had.
'Tis this expands the least event And swells the scantest deed — My right to walk upon the Earth If they this moment had.
# I know some lonely Houses off the Road

* "The Lonely House" in Poems (1890)
* "I know some lonely houses off the road" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# I know that He exists

* "I know that he exists" in Poems: Second Series (1891)
* "I know that he exists" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# I like to see it lap the Miles—

* "The Railway Train" in Poems: Second Series (1891)
* "I like to see it lap the miles" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# I know a youth

Song from the operetta Ruddigore
* "He and She" in Songs of a Savoyard (1890)
* Duet (I know a youth) in Ruddigore (reprint, 1912)
# I like a look of Agony

* "Real" in Poems (1890)
* "I like a look of agony" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# Hill v. State

The deadline to bring a claim against an estate is two years after the probate court issued letters testamentary. This is called the "statute of non-claim." In Hill's Executrix v. State, 23 Ark. 604 (1861), the State of Arkansas waited five years to bring its claim against Hill's estate by suing his executrix.
The chancery court ruled in favor of the State and let the claim go forward. On appeal, the Arkansas Supreme Court (English, C.J.) held this was error because the State was not exempt from the statute of non-claim.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
23 Ark. 604
Hill Ex. v. The STATE
Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court.
Hon. H. F. FAIRCHILD, Chancellor.
​WATKINS & GALLAGHER, for appellant.
HEMPSTEAD, for appellee.
[Opinion of the court by Chief Justice ELBERT H. ENGLISH. Justice HULBERT F. FAIRCHILD not participating.]
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hill v. Smith (260 U.S. 592)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
260 U.S. 592
Hill v. Smith (260 U.S. 592)
Argued: Jan. 3, 1923. --- Decided: Jan 15, 1923
Messrs. Geo. S. Fuller and Edward E. Blodgett, both of Boston, Mass., for petitioners.
Mr. Edward F. McClennen, of Boston, Mass., for respondent.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hill v. Sumner

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
132 U.S. 118
Hill v. Sumner
T. M. Patterson and C. S. Thomas, for plaintiff in error.
L. C. Rockwell, for defendant in error.
MILLER, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hill v. Texas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
316 U.S. 400
Hill v. Texas
Argued: and Submitted May 11, 1942. --- Decided: June 1, 1942
Mr. J. F. McCutcheon, of Dallas, Tex., for petitioner.
Messrs. Pat Coon, Jr., and Spurgeon E. Bell, both of Austin, Tex., for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# History of the Down Survey (Petty 1851)/1

HISTORY OF THE SURVEY OF IRELAND.
CHAPTER I.
Dr. Petty's going to Ireland, 1652.
# Illinois Central Railroad Company of the State of Illinois v. Henderson Elevator Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
226 U.S. 441
Illinois Central Railroad Company of the State of Illinois v. Henderson Elevator Company
Argued: and submitted December 19, 1912. --- Decided: January 6, 1913
The Henderson Elevator Company, defendant in error, as plaintiff below, brought this action to recover damages from the railroad company, the plaintiff in error, because of a loss alleged to have been sustained by an erroneous quotation by the agent of the railroad company of the freight rate on corn shipped in interstate commerce from the station of the railroad company at Henderson, Kentucky. A rate of 10 cents per hundred pounds was quoted by the agent when in fact, the rate as fixed by the published tariff on file with the Interstate Commerce Commission, and effective at the time, was 13 1/2 cents per hundred pounds. On the trial before a jury the court instructed that if the loss sustained by the plaintiff 'was occasioned and brought about by defendant's failure to have posted or on file in its office in Henderson, Kentucky, its freight tariff rate in question, and by reason of any erroneous quotation of defendant of its freight rate from and to the points in question, of which plaintiff complains,' there should be a verdict for the plaintiff. A verdict having been rendered for the plaintiff in accordance with this instruction, and the judgment entered thereon having been subsequently affirmed by the court of appeals of Kentucky (138 Ky. 220, 127 S. W. 779), this writ of error was sued out.
It is to us clear that the action of the court below in affirming the judgment of the trial court, and the reasons upon which that action was based, were in conflict with the rulings of this court, interpreting and applying the act to regulate commerce. New York C. & H. R. R. Co. v. United States, 212 U.S. 504, 53 L. ed. 627, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 309; Texas & P. R. Co. v. Mugg, 202 U.S. 242, 50 L. ed. 1011, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 628; Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. Hefley, 158 U.S. 98, 39 L. ed. 910, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 802. That the failure to post does not prevent the case from being controlled by the settled rule established by the cases referred to is now beyond question. Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. Albers Commission Co. 223 U.S. 594 (a), 56 L. ed. 567, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 316.
Reversed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Illinois Central Railroad Company of the State of Illinois v. Henderson Elevator Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
226 U.S. 441
Illinois Central Railroad Company of the State of Illinois v. Henderson Elevator Company
Argued: and submitted December 19, 1912. --- Decided: January 6, 1913
Messrs. Edmund F. Trabue and Blewett Lee for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 441-444 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. James W. Clay, J. F. Clay, and A. Y. Clay for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 444-446 intentionally omitted]
Memorandum opinion, by direction of the court, by Mr. Chief Justice white:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Illinois Central Company v. Crail

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
281 U.S. 57
Illinois Central Company v. Crail
Argued: Jan. 10, 1930. --- Decided: Feb 24, 1930
Messrs. Edward C. Craig, of Chicago, Ill. and Edwin C. Brown, of Minneapolis, Minn., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from page 58 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Stanley B. Houck, of Minneapolis, Minn., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 59-61 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Illinois Central Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
385 U.S. 457
Illinois Central Company v. United States
ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RY. CO.
v.
UNITED STATES et al.
No. 688.
MONON RAILROAD
v.
UNITED STATES et al.
No. 689. Supreme Court of the United States
January 9, 1967
Hugh B. Cox, William H. Allen, Robert Mitten and William J. O'Brien, Jr., for Illinois Central R. Co.
Nuel D. Belnap, Richard M. Freeman and Daniel J. Sweeney, for St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co.
John B. Goodrich, for Monon Railroad.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn, for the United States and others.
James W. Hoeland, W. L. Grubbs and Joseph L. Lenihan, for Louisville & Nashville R. Co.
W. McNeil Kennedy, for Chicago & Eastern Illinois R. Co.
Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Samuel W. Block, Thomas P. Sullivan and John C. Tucker, for Missouri Pac. R. Co.
Leon Leighton, pro se.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Illinois Central Company v. Minnesota

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
309 U.S. 157
Illinois Central Company v. Minnesota
Argued: Jan. 8, 1940. --- Decided: Jan 29, 1940
See 309 U.S. 695, 60 S.Ct. 585, 84 L.Ed. --.
Mr. Charles A. Helsell, of Fort Dodge, Iowa, for appellant.
Mr. John A. Weeks, of Minneapolis, Minn., for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from page 158 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Illinois Central Company v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
385 U.S. 457
Illinois Central Company v. United States
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hobart v. Hobart

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
355 U.S. 21
Hobart v. Hobart
Messrs. Baird Broomhall, William M. Harrelson and Richard Wilson, for appellant.
C. V. Diedel and Mr. Frank E. Bazler, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hobart v. Hobart/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
355 U.S. 21
Hobart v. Hobart
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hobbs v. Beach (175 U.S. 725)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
175 U.S. 725
Hobbs v. Beach

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hobbs v. Beach (175 U.S. 725)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
175 U.S. 725
Hobbs v. Beach

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hobbs v. Beach

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Hobbs v. Beach."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Hobbs v. Beach (175 U.S. 725)
* Hobbs v. Beach (180 U.S. 383)
# Immigration and Crime

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Immigration and Crime."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Immigration and Crime" by Sydney George Fisher in Popular Science Monthly, 49 (September 1896)
* "Immigration and Crime" by H. H. Hart in The American Journal of Sociology, 02 (3) (November, 1896)
# Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias
## Dissenting Opinion

    Stevens
United States Supreme Court
502 U.S. 478
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias
No. 90-1342 Argued: Nov. 4, 1991. --- Decided: Jan 22, 1992
Syllabus
Respondent, a native of Guatemala, was apprehended for entering the United States without inspection. In his deportation proceedings, the Board of Immigration Appeals determined that he was ineligible for a discretionary grant of asylum. In reversing that determination, the Court of Appeals ruled that a guerrilla organization's acts of conscription constitute persecution on account of political opinion and that respondent therefore had a well-founded fear of such persecution.
Held: A guerrilla organization's attempt to coerce a person into performing military service does not necessarily constitute "persecution on account of . . . political opinion" under § 101(a)(42) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42). Even one who supports the political aims of a guerrilla movement might resist military combat and thus become the object of such coercion. Moreover, persecution on account of political opinion is not established by the fact that the coercing guerrillas had "political" motives. In order to satisfy § 101(a)(42), the persecution must be on account of the victim's political opinion, not the persecutor's. Since respondent did not produce evidence so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution on account of political opinion, the Court of Appeals had no proper basis to set aside the BIA's determination. See 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(4); NLRB v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co., 306 U.S. 292, 300, 59 S.Ct. 501, 505, 83 L.Ed. 660. Pp. 481-484.
921 F.2d 844, reversed.
SCALIA, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which REHNQUIST, C.J., and WHITE, KENNEDY, SOUTER, and THOMAS, JJ., joined.
STEVENS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which BLACKMUN and O'CONNOR, JJ., joined.
Maureen E. Mahoney, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
James Robertson, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Justice SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Immaculate Mary

* related portals: Hymns.
* related authors: Mary of Nazareth.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
also called Lourdes Hymn or Ave Maria of Lourdes: Popular Catholic Marian hymn, particularly associated with pilgrimage to the Sanctuary of Our Lady of Lourdes. It was originally written in 1873 by Jean Gaignet to a traditional French tune.
Many original versions have since been written in many languages, and unrelated hymns have also been modified to fit the Lourdes Hymn tune and refrain.
* "Immaculate Mother, we come at thy call", anon., published in Antoine Police's Parochial Hymn Book (1879)
* "O Mother, dear Mother, we flock to thy throne", anon., published in Antoine Police's Parochial Hymn Book (1879)
* "Immaculate Mary, our hearts are on fire", anon., published in Augustus Edmonds Tozer's Catholic Church Hymns (1898).
* "Immaculate Mary, thy praises we sing", anon., revision of "Hail Virgin of Virgins" by Jeremiah Cummings (1952).
# Imitation

First published in Tamerlane and other poems (1827). See also: To — — and A Dream within a Dream
* Imitation, Orig. ed., 1827 Tamerlane and Other Poems, pp. 27-28
* Imitation, R H Shepherd, ed., 1884 Tamerlane and Other Poems, (1827 reprint) p. 45. London: George Redway