OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Burbank v. Ernst

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
232 U.S. 162
Burbank v. Ernst
Argued: January 15 and 16, 1914. --- Decided: January 26, 1914
Messrs. Charles S. Rice, Sam Streetman, and Richard B. Montgomery for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Henry P. Dart for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Burbank v. Conrad

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Clifford
United States Supreme Court
96 U.S. 291
Burbank v. Conrad
ERROR to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana.
This was a suit for partition of certain real property in New Orleans, and was brought in a district court of Louisiana. The defendants had judgment, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the State, and the plaintiff brought the case here on writ of error. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Thomas J. Durant and Mr. J. Q. A. Fellows for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. L. L. Conrad, contra.
MR. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Burbank v. Semmes

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
99 U.S. 138
Burbank v. Semmes
ERROR to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana.
This was an action brought in the Fourth District Court of the Parish of New Orleans by Thomas J. Semmes, against Edward W. Burbank, for the recovery of one-half of lot No. 15, fronting on Edward Street, in the city of New Orleans, in the Square bounded by Annunciation, Benjamin, St. Thomas, and Edward Streets.
Semmes prayed that he be adjudged the lawful owner of the lot, and entitled to the possession thereof.
Burbank claimed title as the purchaser under a venditioni exponas, directed to the marshal of the United States for the then Eastern District of Louisiana, issued by the District Court for that district in United States v. Six Lots of Ground, property of Thomas J. Semmes. The suit was brought under the act of Congress of July 17, 1862, 12 Stat. 589. The marshal conveyed the lot to Burbank, by deed bearing date June 15, 1865. Semmes was the owner of several lots in that square; and by the decree of condemnation rendered in that suit his title in and to lots 14, 16, 17, and part of 18 was divested. Neither in the libel, the monition, the decree of condemnation, nor the writ, was lot 15 mentioned.
A judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the State, and Burbank then sued out this writ of error.
Mr. Thomas J. Durant for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. Thomas J. Semmes, contra.
MR. JUSTICE CLIFFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bible (World English)

The World English Bible (also known as WEB) is a public domain translation of the Bible. It is based on the 1901 American Standard Version, the Greek Majority Text, and the Hebrew Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia. The New Testament is considered complete and is available in print.Warning: template has been deprecated.

## The Old Testament

* Genesis
* Exodus
* Leviticus
* Numbers
* Deuteronomy
* Joshua
* Judges
* Ruth
* 1 Samuel
* 2 Samuel
* 1 Kings
* 2 Kings
* 1 Chronicles
* 2 Chronicles
* Ezra
* Nehemiah
* Esther
* Job
* Psalms
* Proverbs
* Ecclesiastes
* Song of Solomon
* Isaiah
* Jeremiah
* Lamentations
* Ezekiel
* Daniel
* Hosea
* Joel
* Amos
* Obadiah
* Jonah
* Micah
* Nahum
* Habakkuk
* Zephaniah
* Haggai
* Zechariah
* Malachi

## The Deuterocanonical Literature

See Deuterocanonical books, on Wikipedia for a discussion on these books and passages of the Christian Old Testament that are not part of the Hebrew Bible
* Enoch
* 1 Esdras
* 2 Esdras
* Tobit
* Judith
* Esther (Greek)
* Wisdom
* Sirach
* Baruch
* Daniel (Greek)
* Prayer of Manasseh
* 1 Maccabees
* 2 Maccabees
* Jeremiah's Letter
* Psalm 151

## The New Testament

* Matthew
* Mark
* Luke
* John
* Acts
* Romans
* 1 Corinthians
* 2 Corinthians
* Galatians
* Ephesians
* Philippians
* Colossians
* 1 Thessalonians
* 2 Thessalonians
* 1 Timothy
* 2 Timothy
* Titus
* Philemon
* Hebrews
* James
* 1 Peter
* 2 Peter
* 1 John
* 2 John
* 3 John
* Jude
* Revelation
Old Testament
* Genesis
* Exodus
* Leviticus
* Numbers
* Deuteronomy
* Joshua
* Judges
* Ruth
* 1 Samuel
* 2 Samuel
* 1 Kings
* 2 Kings
* 1 Chronicles
* 2 Chronicles
* Ezra
* Nehemiah
* Esther
* Job
* Psalms
* Proverbs
* Ecclesiastes
* Song of Solomon
* Isaiah
* Jeremiah
* Lamentations
* Ezekiel
* Daniel
* Hosea
* Joel
* Amos
* Obadiah
* Jonah
* Micah
* Nahum
* Habakkuk
* Zephaniah
* Haggai
* Zechariah
* Malachi
Deuterocanon/Apocrypha
* Enoch
* 1 Esdras
* 2 Esdras
* Tobit
* Judith
* Esther (Greek)
* Wisdom
* Sirach
* Baruch
* Daniel (Greek)
* Prayer of Manasseh
* 1 Maccabees
* 2 Maccabees
* Jeremiah's Letter
* Psalm 151
New Testament
* Matthew
* Mark
* Luke
* John
* Acts
* Romans
* 1 Corinthians
* 2 Corinthians
* Galatians
* Ephesians
* Philippians
* Colossians
* 1 Thessalonians
* 2 Thessalonians
* 1 Timothy
* 2 Timothy
* Titus
* Philemon
* Hebrews
* James
* 1 Peter
* 2 Peter
* 1 John
* 2 John
* 3 John
* Jude
* Revelation
This work is in the public domain worldwide because it has been so released by the copyright holder.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Busey v. District of Columbia

United States Supreme Court
319 U.S. 579
Busey v. District of Columbia
Argued: June 1, 1943. --- Decided: June 14, 1943
Mr. Hayden C. Covington, of Brooklyn, N.Y., for petitioners.
Mr. Vernon E. West, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Busell Trimmer Company v. Stevens

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
137 U.S. 423
Busell Trimmer Company v. Stevens
J. E. Maynadier, for appellants.
T. W. Porter, for appellees.
LAMAR, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bush Studies

BARBARA BAYNTON
BUSH STUDIES
BY
BARBARA BAYNTON
LONDON DUCKWORTH & CO., 3, HENRIETTA STREET, W.C.
MDCCCCII.
PRINTED BY R. FOLKARD AND SON, 33, DEVONSHIRE STREET, QUEEN SQUARE, BLOOMSBURY, LONDON, W.C.
TO HELEN McMILLEN OF SYDNEY NEW SOUTH WALES
CONTENTS.
| | PAGE |
| A Dreamer | 1 |
| Squeaker's Mate | 15 |
| Scrammy 'And | 44 |
| Billy Skywonkie | 79 |
| Bush Church | 106 |
| The Chosen Vessel | 142 |
NOTE.
Scrammy 'And. "Scrammy" indicates malformation of either hand or foot.
Billy Skywonkie. "Skywonkie" signifies weather-prophet.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1929, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 94 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Busey v. District of Columbia/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Wikipedia article
United States Supreme Court
319 U.S. 579
Busey v. District of Columbia
Argued: June 1, 1943. --- Decided: June 14, 1943
In this case petitioners, who are Jehovah's Witnesses, were convicted of selling on the streets of the District of Columbia, magazines whih expound their religious views, without first procuring the license and paying the license tax required by § 47 2336 of the District of Columbia Code (1940). In affirming the conviction the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia below had two questions before it: Whether the statute was applicable to petitioners, and if so whether its application as to them infringed the First Amendment. The court construed the statute as applicable and sustained its constitutionality (75 U.S.App.D.C. 352, 129 F.2d 24), following the decision in Cole v. City of Fort Smith, 202 Ark. 614, 151 S.W.2d 1000, the judgment in which was affirmed by this Court in Bowden v. Fort Smith, 316 U.S. 584, 62 S.Ct. 1231, 86 L.Ed. 1691, 141 A.L.R. 514, one of the cases argued together with Jones v. City of Opelika, 316 U.S. 584, 62 S.Ct. 1231, 86 L.Ed. 1691, 141 A.L.R. 514. Since the decision below, and after hearing reargument in the Opelika case, we have vacated our earlier judgment and held the license tax imposed in that case to be unconstitutional. Jones v. Opelika, 319 U.S. 103, 63 S.Ct. 890, 87 L.Ed. --; Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105, 63 S.Ct. 870, 87 L.Ed. --. Petitioners urge us to construe the District of Columbia statute as inapplicable in order to avoid the constitutional infirmity which might otherwise exist-an infirmity conceded by respondent on the oral argument before us. In view of our decisions in the Opelika and Murdock cases, we vacate the judgment in this case and remand the cause to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to enable it to reexamine its rulings on the construction and validity of the District ordinance in the light of those decisions. Cf. People ex rel. Whitman v. Wilson, 318 U.S. 688, 63 S.Ct. 840, 87 L.Ed. --, and cases cited.
So ordered.
Judgment vacated and cause remanded with directions.
Mr. Justice RUTLEDGE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bardelys the Magnificent

   One of the best of recent Sabatini thrillers, in Languedoc in the year of the rebellion —The Bookman, Sept 1924
BARDELYS THE MAGNIFICENT
BARDELYS THE MAGNIFICENT
Being an Account of the Strange Wooing pursued by the Sieur Marcel de Saint-Pol; Marquis of Bardelys, and of the things that in the course of it befell him in Languedoc, in the year of the Rebellion
BY RAFAEL SABATINI
TORONTO THOMAS ALLEN BOSTON AND NEW YORK HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY
COPYRIGHT, 1905, BY C. ARTHUR PEARSON, LTD.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
The Knickerbocker Press
CAMBRIDGE • MASSACHUSETTS
PRINTED IN THE U.S.A.
AI MIEI GENITORI

### CONTENTS

* I. The Wager 3
* II. The King's Wishes 17
* III. René de Lesperon 23
* IV. A Maid in the Moonlight 32
* V. The Vicomte de Lavédan 45
* VI. In Convalescence 57
* VII. The Hostility of Saint-Eustache 71
* VIII. The Portrait 96
* IX. A Night Alarm 106
* X. The Risen Dead 121
* XI. The King's Commissioner 134
* XII. The Tribunal of Toulouse 145
* XIII. The Eleventh Hour 163
* XIV. Eavesdropping 174
* XV. Monsieur de Chatellerault is Angry 186
* XVI. Swords! 197
* XVII. The Babbling of Ganymède 209
* XVIII. Saint-Eustache is Obstinate 222
* XIX. The Flint and the Steel 236
* XX. The “Bravi” At Blagnac 255
* XXI. Louis the Just 270
* XXII. We Unsaddle 281
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1950, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 73 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barclay Company v. Edwards

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
267 U.S. 442
Barclay Company v. Edwards
Argued: Nov. 24, 1924. --- Decided: March 9, 1925
Messrs. Porter J. McCumber, of Washington, D. C., and Franklin Grady, of New York City, for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 442-446 intentionally omitted]
Mr. James M. Beck, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for defendant in error.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Biographical Sketches of Dekkan Poets/Kapilar

KAPILAR.
This was one of the brothers of the before-mentioned poetess. Teruvallor is mentioned as his birth place, which was in the Chola country, he was brought up by a braman, and was educated in the TamuI language, which he very soon became master of. He composed a work, called Aghavar, which is a relation in verse of all the events of his own life, and that of his brothers and sisters, mentioning the places of their births and so forth.
# Biographical Sketches of Dekkan Poets/Keladi Basavappa Naik

KELADI BASAVAPPA NAICK.
Was a ruler of Keladi in the Bednore country, he lived in the sixteenth century of the Salivahana aera. There is a work in existence called Seva Tatva Ratna Kara, or the ocean of preeminence of Seva, of which he is the ostensible author, but it is well known that the work was composed by the pundits of his Court—it treats on several Arts and Sciences, and seems to have been executed with much labor.
# Biographical Sketches of Dekkan Poets/Kshira Swami

KSHIRA SWAMI.
This poet was a bramin and flourished during the reign of Pratapa Rudra. He wrote a Sanscrit Dictionary which he entitled "Kshira Swami Nighanti," consisting of about two thousand verses in addition to which he wrote a commentary on the "Amra cosha." Kshira Swami is ​said to have attained to a good old age without being afflicted with any sickness owing principally to his regular and temperate mode of life.
# Biographical Sketches of Dekkan Poets/Jagannath

JAGANNATH.
Was a native of the northern provinces, and was descended from a pure tribe: at an early age, he studied Telugu grammar, and in course of time, composed a work on the conduct of sovereigns, which treatise procured for him the patronage of the Telugu Rajahs. His reading in Sanscrit works was very extensive, and he translated from that language into the vernacular, the "Raja Niti—or the duties of monarchs a poem in four books.
# Biographical Sketches of Dekkan Poets/Kalyana Mala

KALYANA MALA.
This was a bramin and native of the Kalinga country, he flourished during the reign of Ananga Bhima, king of Kalinga, who built the temple of Jagarnath in the year 1119 of the Silivabahan aera, which is proved by inscription, he composed a work on sexual intercourse, and called it Ananga Ranga, after his royal master.
# Biographical Sketches of Dekkan Poets/Kristna Royulu

KRISTNA ROYULU.
Was a king of Vidyanagar or Anagondi, and father to the princess just mentioned, he was enstalled to the throne at the death of his father ​Nrisimha Roya, and became renowned, both for his conquests and encouragement of literature. He was instructed in the art of Govenment by Appagi or Timmarasu, who was tutor to him during his minority. He was likewise a great conqueror, and invaded the Telugu and other countries, which he subdued by his armies. This monarch was very partial to Telugu poetry. Allasani Peddana dedicated to this sovereign, his poem named Swarochisha Manu Charitra: on this work Kristna Royalu made a commentary, which he called Amukta Mala, or necklace of pearls: in this effusion was comprised rules on public administration of affairs, and the duties of a sovereign. After this the king translated the Rasa Manjari, a treatise on amatory subjects; the Madalasa Charitra, a history of a celebrated king: the Sakala Katha Sara Sangraham, an abridgement of several popular tales. This prince was a great encourager of learning, and a munificent patron; he died in the fortieth year of his age, in the year of Salivahana 1446.
# Biographical Sketches of Dekkan Poets/Lakshmana Kavi

LAKSHMANA KAVI.
This poet was a native of the Telugu country, after he left school, he read over many Telugu ​books on grammar, and by practice became acquainted with all the Telugu nouns. He compiled a compendious vocabulary in four books called Andhra-nama Sangraha, which was a treatise on the different pronunciations of the Telugu tongue; this is a Work of great utility, as it gives the meanings of various Telugu words, being a complete digest of synonimes. When this treatise was finished, he composed another work, called "Subhashita Ratnakara," or the ocean of polite phrases, which is intended as a sequel to the former work. The princes of Telugu highly encouraged Lakshmana Kavi, and by their liberality, he was enabled to live in comparative affluence; he ended his days in his native country.
# Biographical Sketches of Dekkan Poets/Kadamba

KADAMBA.
This illustrious individual was the prime-minister to Gazapati Pretapa Rudra, he was a native cf Kolinga and was a man of great power and influence. He was an excellent Astronomer and showed a predeliction for that Science from his very infancy. He composed a work which he called "Jotisha Arnava," or the Ocean of Astronomy and in the preface to that book it is related that he was born in the year 1384 of the Salevaha aera.—This work is in mach repute and very useful to Hindu Almanack compilers.
# Biographical Sketches of Dekkan Poets/Hemanda Pant

HEMANDA PANT.
This poet was a Maharata bramin, and an inhabitant of Dowlatbad according to tradition. He was employed in the service of Rama Rajah, as a dewan for some time, and afterwards on account of some accident he went to Lanka, and received some kind of rare grain, for curing the King of that place, from the effects of the evil eye. This poet introduced the mode character into the Maharata country, he died in the sixtieth year of his age, at his own residence.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kalāl

​Kalāl.— A Hindustani synonym of Gamalla.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kalāsi

​Kalāsi.— A name given to Vāda fishermen by Oriya people.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kamadi

​Kamadi (tortoise). — A gōtra of Kurni.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kambalam

​Kambalam.— The name Kambalam is applied to a group of nine castes (Tottiyan, Annappan, Kāppiliyan, Chakkiliyan, etc.), because at their council meetings a blanket (kambli) is spread, on which is placed a brass vessel (kalasam) filled with water, and decorated with flowers. (See Tottiyan.)
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kambalattān

​Kambalattān.___A synonym of Tottiyan.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kalyānakulam

​Kalyānakulam (marriage people). — A fanciful name returned by some Mangalas at times of census, as they officiate as musicians at marriages.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kambha

​Kambha.— Kambha or Kambhāpu, meaning a pillar or post, has been recorded as an exogamous sept of Mādiga and Kōmati.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kamma (ear ornament)

​Kamma (ear ornament). — An exogamous sept of Motāti Kāpu.
# Castes and Tribes of Southern India/Kamban

​Kamban.— A title of the Ōcchans, to which caste the great Tamil epic poet Kamban is reputed to have belonged.
# CIA World Fact Book, 2004/Austria

This page was last updated on 1 January 2003
This is a snapshot of the CIA World Fact Book as it existed on 26 March 2005
# CIA World Fact Book, 2004/Bahrain

This page was last updated on 1 January 2003
This is a snapshot of the CIA World Fact Book as it existed on 26 March 2005
# CIA World Fact Book, 2004/Aruba

This page was last updated on 1 January 2003
This is a snapshot of the CIA World Fact Book as it existed on 26 March 2005
# CIA World Fact Book, 2004/Bahamas, The

This page was last updated on 1 January 2003
This is a snapshot of the CIA World Fact Book as it existed on 26 March 2005
# CIA World Fact Book, 2004/Atlantic Ocean

This page was last updated on 1 January 2003
This is a snapshot of the CIA World Fact Book as it existed on 26 March 2005
# CIA World Fact Book, 2004/Australia

This page was last updated on 1 January 2003
This is a snapshot of the CIA World Fact Book as it existed on 26 March 2005
# CIA World Fact Book, 2004/Azerbaijan

This page was last updated on 1 January 2003
This is a snapshot of the CIA World Fact Book as it existed on 26 March 2005
# CIA World Fact Book, 2004/Argentina

This page was last updated on 1 January 2003
This is a snapshot of the CIA World Fact Book as it existed on 26 March 2005
# CIA World Fact Book, 2004/Armenia

This page was last updated on 1 January 2003
This is a snapshot of the CIA World Fact Book as it existed on 26 March 2005
# CIA World Fact Book, 2004/Ashmore and Cartier Islands

This page was last updated on 1 January 2003
This is a snapshot of the CIA World Fact Book as it existed on 26 March 2005
# Carpenter v. Washington G. Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
121 U.S. 474
Carpenter v. Washington G. Railroad Company
[C. C. Cole, for plaintiff in error.
W. D. Davidge and Enoch Totten, for defendant in error.
MILLER, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Carpenter v. Williams

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
76 U.S. 785
Carpenter v. Williams
ERROR to the Supreme Court of Missouri.
Williams filed a petition, afterwards amended, in the St. Louis Land Court, against Carpenter, to determine the title to a lot of ground, once belonging to the common field lots of St. Louis.
The amended petition stated in substance that the land in dispute was proved (confirmed) in the name of Louis Lacroix, when in fact Joseph Lacroix was the person intended; that the recorder of land titles at St. Louis took proof of Joseph's right, and made a mistake in the name of the claimant, or by accident wrote Louis instead of Joseph. The object of the suit as amended was to reform this confirmation, correct this supposed mistake, and and obtain a decree in favor of the persons claiming under Joseph Lacroix for the title which the defendant, Carpenter, had procured from the heirs of Louis Lacroix. The St. Louis Land Court gave judgment in favor of the plaintiff; and the Supreme Court of Missouri having affirmed the judgment, the other side brought the case here.
Mr. Britton Hill moved to dismiss the case for want of jurisdiction, assuming, as the defendant claimed under the government of the United States, and as his title had been decided against, that the case came within the twenty-fifth section of the Judiciary Act.
Messrs. Glover and Shepley opposed the motion.
Mr. Justice MILLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse