OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Reports/Volume 378

* 378 U.S. 1 (1964) Malloy v. Hogan
* 378 U.S. 39 (1964) United States v. Boyd
* 378 U.S. 52 (1964) Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
* 378 U.S. 108 (1964) Aguilar v. Texas
* 378 U.S. 123 (1964) Viking Theatre Corp. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.
* 378 U.S. 124 (1964) Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control for California v. Ammex Warehouse Company of San Ysidro, Inc.
* 378 U.S. 126 (1964) Benko v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
* 378 U.S. 127 (1964) Elfbrandt v. Russell
* 378 U.S. 128 (1964) Curtis, Inc. v. United States
* 378 U.S. 129 (1964) Zoumah v. United States
* 378 U.S. 130 (1964) Griffin v. Maryland
* 378 U.S. 139 (1964) Fallen v. United States
* 378 U.S. 146 (1964) Barr v. City of Columbia
* 378 U.S. 153 (1964) Robinson v. Florida
* 378 U.S. 158 (1964) United States v. Penn-Olin Chemical Company
* 378 U.S. 184 (1964) Jacobellis v. Ohio
* 378 U.S. 205 (1964) A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas
* 378 U.S. 226 (1964) Bell v. Maryland
* 378 U.S. 347 (1964) Bouie v. City of Columbia
* 378 U.S. 368 (1964) Jackson v. Denno
* 378 U.S. 441 (1964) United States v. Continental Can Company
* 378 U.S. 478 (1964) Escobedo v. Illinois
* 378 U.S. 500 (1964) Aptheker v. Secretary of State
* 378 U.S. 530 (1964) Berman v. United States
* 378 U.S. 539 (1964) Dresner v. City of Tallahassee
* 378 U.S. 540 (1964) Aldrich v. Aldrich
* 378 U.S. 544 (1964) Leonard v. United States
* 378 U.S. 546 (1964) Cooper v. Pate
* 378 U.S. 547 (1964) Drews v. Maryland
* 378 U.S. 548 (1964) Williams v. North Carolina
* 378 U.S. 549 (1964) Rogers v. United States
* 378 U.S. 550 (1964) Green v. Virginia
* 378 U.S. 551 (1964) Mitchell v. City of Charleston
* 378 U.S. 553 (1964) Swann v. Adams
* 378 U.S. 554 (1964) Meyers v. Thigpen
* 378 U.S. 555 (1964) Lucas v. Adams
* 378 U.S. 557 (1964) West v. Carr
* 378 U.S. 566 (1964) Lathan v. New York
* 378 U.S. 567 (1964) Lopez v. Texas
* 378 U.S. 568 (1964) Oister v. Pennsylvania
* 378 U.S. 569 (1964) Muschette v. United States
* 378 U.S. 570 (1964) Del Hoyo v. New York
* 378 U.S. 571 (1964) Pea v. United States
* 378 U.S. 572 (1964) Harris v. Texas
* 378 U.S. 573 (1964) Catanzaro v. New York
* 378 U.S. 574 (1964) Owen v. Arizona
* 378 U.S. 575 (1964) McNerlin v. Denno
* 378 U.S. 576 (1964) Tralins v. Gerstein
* 378 U.S. 577 (1964) Grove Press, Inc. v. Gerstein
* 378 U.S. 578 (1964) Fried v. New York
* 378 U.S. 579 (1964) Mayer v. Rusk
* 378 U.S. 580 (1964) Inland Empire Builders, Inc. v. Washington
* 378 U.S. 583 (1964) Hudson County News Company v. Sills
* 378 U.S. 584 (1964) Smith v. Crouse
* 378 U.S. 585 (1964) Ruark v. Colorado
* 378 U.S. 586 (1964) Peoples v. United States
* 378 U.S. 588 (1964) Copeland v. Secretary of State
* 378 U.S. 589 (1964) Etchieson v. Texas
* 378 U.S. 904 (1964) Henry v. Mississippi
* 378 U.S. 929 (1964) Oppenheimer v. California
# United States Reports/Volume 38

13 Pet.[ers], ( 10 L.Ed. )
* 38 U.S. 1 (1839) Woodward v. Brown
* 38 U.S. 6 (1839) Whiting v. Bank of the United States
* 38 U.S. 17 (1839) Van Ness v. Bank of the United States
* 38 U.S. 23 (1839) Rhode Island v. Massachusetts
* 38 U.S. 26 (1839) Smith v. Richards
* 38 U.S. 45 (1839) Ross v. Duval
* 38 U.S. 65 (1839) Andrews v. Pond
* 38 U.S. 81 (1839) United States v. Levy
* 38 U.S. 84 (1839) United States v. Drummond
* 38 U.S. 85 (1839) United States v. Burgevin
* 38 U.S. 88 (1839) United States v. Heirs of Arredondo
* 38 U.S. 89 (1839) William Bradley v. Washington Alexandria and Georgetown Steam Packet Company
* 38 U.S. 107 (1839) Bank of the United States v. Lee
* 38 U.S. 123 (1839) Bank of the United States v. Peter
* 38 U.S. 128 (1839) King v. Thompson
* 38 U.S. 133 (1839) United States v. Heirs of Arredondo
* 38 U.S. 136 (1839) Wallace v. M'Connell
* 38 U.S. 153 (1839) Lessee of Reed v. Marsh
* 38 U.S. 157 (1839) Ocean Insurance Company v. Polleys
* 38 U.S. 166 (1839) Walker v. Parker
* 38 U.S. 176 (1839) United States v. Hardyman
* 38 U.S. 181 (1839) Stokes v. Saltonstall
* 38 U.S. 195 (1839) Clark v. Smith
* 38 U.S. 205 (1839) Downes v. Church
* 38 U.S. 209 (1839) Stein v. Bowman
* 38 U.S. 225 (1839) Ex Parte in the matter of Hennen
* 38 U.S. 263 (1839) Bend v. Hoyt
* 38 U.S. 279 (1839) Ex Parte Hoyt
* 38 U.S. 292 (1839) Hardy v. Hoyt
* 38 U.S. 294 (1839) Van Ness v. Hyatt
* 38 U.S. 302 (1839) Moore v. Bank of the Metropolis
* 38 U.S. 312 (1839) M'Elmoyle v. Cohen Administrator of Florence
* 38 U.S. 331 (1839) Columbian Insurance Company of Alexandria v. Ashby
* 38 U.S. 345 (1839) Moncure v. Dermott
* 38 U.S. 359 (1839) Story v. Livingston Executrix of Livingston
* 38 U.S. 378 (1839) Wilcox v. Hunt
* 38 U.S. 381 (1839) Lupton v. Janney Executor of Lupton
* 38 U.S. 387 (1839) New England Insurance Company v. Brig Sarah Ann Woodbury
* 38 U.S. 404 (1839) Ex parte Whitney
* 38 U.S. 409 (1839) Heirs of Emerson v. Hall
* 38 U.S. 415 (1839) Williams v. Suffolk Insurance Company
* 38 U.S. 423 (1839) Anthony v. Butler
* 38 U.S. 436 (1839) Bagnell v. Broderick
* 38 U.S. 459 (1839) Keene v. Whittaker
* 38 U.S. 460 (1839) Carr v. Hoxie
* 38 U.S. 464 (1839) Burton v. Smith
* 38 U.S. 486 (1839) Meredith v. United States
* 38 U.S. 498 (1839) Wilcox v. Jackson
* 38 U.S. 519 (1839) Bank of Augusta v. Earle
# United States Reports/Volume 381

* 381 U.S. 1 (1965) Zemel v. Rusk
* 381 U.S. 41 (1965) Maryland ex rel. Levin v. United States
* 381 U.S. 54 (1965) United States v. Midland-Ross Corporation
* 381 U.S. 68 (1965) Dixon v. Unied States
* 381 U.S. 81 (1965) Simons v. Miami Beach First National Bank
* 381 U.S. 90 (1965) Federal Power Commission v. Union Electric Company
* 381 U.S. 124 (1965) Corbett v. Stergios
* 381 U.S. 125 (1965) Susser v. Carvel Corporation
* 381 U.S. 126 (1965) Watts v. Seward School Board
* 381 U.S. 129 (1965) Parrot v. City of Tallahassee
* 381 U.S. 130 (1965) McClellan v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company
* 381 U.S. 131 (1965) Holt v. Virginia
* 381 U.S. 139 (1965) United States v. California
* 381 U.S. 214 (1965) Jaben v. United States
* 381 U.S. 233 (1965) United States v. Atlas Life Insurance Company
* 381 U.S. 252 (1965) Waterman Steamship Corp. v. United States
* 381 U.S. 277 (1965) O'Connell v. Manning
* 381 U.S. 278 (1965) Killgore v. Blackwell
* 381 U.S. 279 (1965) Federal Communications Commission v. Schreiber
* 381 U.S. 301 (1965) Lamont v. Postmaster General
* 381 U.S. 311 (1965) Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company v. New Jersey Wood Finishing Company
* 381 U.S. 336 (1965) Case v. Nebraska
* 381 U.S. 348 (1965) Columbia Artists Management, Inc. v. United States
* 381 U.S. 353 (1965) Baxa v. United States
* 381 U.S. 355 (1965) Walker v. Georgia
* 381 U.S. 356 (1965) McLeod v. Ohio
* 381 U.S. 357 (1965) Atlantic Refining Company v. Federal Trade Commission
* 381 U.S. 392 (1965) United Gas Improvement Company v. Continental Oil Company
* 381 U.S. 407 (1965) Scott v. Germano
* 381 U.S. 412 (1965) Air Dispatch, Inc. v. United States
* 381 U.S. 413 (1965) United States v. Leiter Minerals, Inc.
* 381 U.S. 414 (1965) Kennecott Copper Corp. v. United States
* 381 U.S. 415 (1965) Jordan v. Silver
* 381 U.S. 420 (1965) Hearne v. Smylie
* 381 U.S. 421 (1965) Drews v. Maryland
* 381 U.S. 431 (1965) Travia v. Lomenzo
* 381 U.S. 437 (1965) United States v. Brown
* 381 U.S. 479 (1965) Griswold v. Connecticut
* 381 U.S. 532 (1965) Estes v. Texas
* 381 U.S. 618 (1965) Linkletter v. Walker
* 381 U.S. 654 (1965) Angelet v. Fay
* 381 U.S. 657 (1965) United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington
* 381 U.S. 676 (1965) Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America v. Jewel Tea Company, Inc.
* 381 U.S. 739 (1965) Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc.
* 381 U.S. 741 (1965) Cameron v. Johnson
* 381 U.S. 761 (1965) Associated Food Retailers of Greater Chicago, Inc. v. Jewell Tea Company
* 381 U.S. 762 (1965) Federal Power Commission v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.
* 381 U.S. 763 (1965) Knowles v. Florida
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/5th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 35

Chap. XXXV.—An Act for the relief of Comfort Sands and others.
Be it enacted, &c.,Examination and settlement of the claim of Comfort Sands. That the accounting officers of the treasury be, and they are hereby, authorized and empowered, upon application of the parties, to examine and decide upon the validity of a certain award or report, made on the twenty-fifth day of October, one thousand seven hundred and eighty-seven, by Isaac Roosevelt, William Malcom, Elbridge Gerry, and Henry Remsen, (four of the referees nominated for the purpose,) between the United States and Comfort Sands and others, his copartners, (contractors for furnishing supplies to the troops during the late war,) and that in making their decision upon the said award or report, the said officers of the treasury shall be governed by principles similar to those which would prevail in a controversy concerning it at law: and if, in the opinion of the accounting officers aforesaid, the said award or report ought to be binding and obligatory against the United States, then, and in such case, but not otherwise, the said Comfort Sands and others, his said copartners, shall be entitled to have their said claim against the United States, as on the said award, allowed and settled at the treasury, in the usual manner, and shall be paid the amount of the claim so to be allowed, out of any moneys which may be in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated: Provided, That if, on examination by the officers of the treasury, it shall be found that the said Comfort Sands, or either of his copartners, are indebted to the United States, they shall charge the amount in which they may be so indebted, against the sums which may be allowed on account of said award.
Approved, March 2, 1799.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/5th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 87

Chap. LXXXVIII.—An Act authorizing the grant and conveyance of a certain lot of ground to Elie Williams.
Sec. Treasury authorized to sell a certain lot of ground.Be it enacted, &c., That the Secretary of the Treasury be, and he hereby is authorized to contract with Elie Williams, for the sale of a certain lot of ground, twenty perches in length, and sixteen perches in breadth, situate in the town of Cincinnati, in the territory northwest of the Ohio, it being the same lot on which certain buildings were erected by the said Elie Williams and Robert Elliot, deceased, when contractors for supplying the western army with provisions.
Patent to be granted.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That on payment into the Treasury of the United States of such sum or sums of money as shall have been agreed upon between the said Elie Williams and the Secretary of the Treasury, as the price of the above mentioned lot, the President of the United States be, and he is hereby authorized to grant a patent for the same, to the said Elie Williams, his heirs or assigns.
Approved, July 16, 1798.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/5th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 9

Chap. IX.—An Act providing for the payment of the interest on a certificate due to General Kosciusko.
Be it enacted, &c.,Interest to be paid to General Kosciusko. That the Secretary of the Treasury be authorized and directed to pay to General Kosciusko, out of any moneys in the Treasury, not otherwise appropriated, an interest at the rate of six per cent. per annum, on the sum of twelve thousand two hundred and eighty dollars and fifty-four cents, the amount of a certificate due to him from the United States, from the first day of January, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-three, to the thirty-first of December, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-seven.
Approved, January 23, 1798.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/5th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 14

Chap. XIV.—An Act allowing James Mathers compensation for services done for the United States, and expenses incurred in rendering said services, as sergeant-at-arms to the Senate.
Allowance to James Mathers.Be it enacted, &c., That the sum of five hundred and one dollars be, and the same is hereby, allowed to James Mathers, for his services and expenses, during the recess of Congress, as sergeant-at-arms to the Senate of the United States, which services were done, and expenses incurred, by order of the Senate; to be paid out of any unappropriated money in the treasury of the United States.
Approved, February 25, 1799.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/5th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 4

Chap. IV.—An Act for the relief of Thomas Lewis.
Allowance to Thomas Lewis.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the proper accounting officers of the treasury be, and they are hereby directed to settle the accounts of Thomas Lewis, a captain in the army of the United States, and to allow him a sum not exceeding eleven hundred and fifty-seven dollars, in full for his extra services and expenses during the time he acted as additional aid-de-camp to the late Major-General Wayne.
Approved, February 15, 1799.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/5th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 7

Chap. VII.—An Act for the relief of Gazzam, Taylor, and Jones, and of Samuel Watt, of the city of Philadelphia.
Be it enacted, &c.,Payment of drawback to Gazzam and others. That the collector of the port of Philadelphia be authorized to pay to Gazzam, Taylor, and Jones, and to Samuel Watt, of the city of Philadelphia, merchants, the amount of the drawback of duties on so much of the cargo of the schooner Eagle, belonging to them, as was shipped, in the year one thousand seven hundred and ninety-six, on board the said vessel, for St. Thomas’s, and reladen in the river Delaware on board the brig Fame, for St. Croix: Provided, it shall appear to the satisfaction of the said collector, that every requisite of the law has been complied with by the said Gazzam, Taylor, and Jones, and of Samuel Watt, to entitle them to the said drawback of duties, in case the said goods had not been re-shipped, as aforesaid.
Approved, February 19, 1799.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/5th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 5

Chap. V.—An Act for the relief of Jonathan Haskill.
Be it enacted, &c.,Allowance to Jonathan Haskill. That the accounting officers of the treasury be, and they are hereby directed to credit and allow to Jonathan Haskill, the sum of two hundred and fifty-eight dollars and twenty-five cents, placed in his hands for the use of a detachment of troops under his command, and by him lost, in the month of September, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-one.
Approved, February 19, 1799.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/6th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 11

Chap. XI.—An Act for the relief of James Yard.
Further time allowed for export of merchandise.Be it enacted, &c., That the term of six months, from and after the passing of this act, shall be, and is hereby, allowed, as a further time for the exportation, with the benefit of drawback, of one hundred and six pipes, eight hogsheads, and five quarter casks, of Madeira wine, which were duly shipped, and with the benefit of drawback, in the months of March and April, of the year one thousand seven hundred and ninety-eight, by James Yard, on board the ship Ganges, then bound to India, but afterwards relanded in consequence of the purchase of that ship by the United States; and any drawback which shall accrue on any parcel of the said wine, which, being first duly identified, shall be exported within the term aforesaid, shall be payable in fifteen days after such exportation, and a debenture or debentures may issue for such drawback, upon the like security, conditions, and proofs, as are required in other cases, and to be paid in a similar manner.
Approved, February 27, 1800.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/6th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 17

Chap. XVII.—An Act for the relief of Campbell Smith.
Settlement of account of C. Smith as Judge AdvocateBe it enacted, &c., That the proper accounting officers of the treasury liquidate and settle the account of Campbell Smith, for his services as judge advocate to the legion of the United States, while he acted in that capacity, under an appointment made by General Wayne, on the sixteenth of July, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-four; and that he be allowed such pay and emoluments for said services, in addition to his pay in the line, as are allowed by law to officers acting in that capacity.
Approved, March 29, 1800.
# United States v. Bank of New York & Trust Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
296 U.S. 463
United States v. Bank of New York & Trust Company
Argued: Dec. 18, 1935. --- Decided: Jan 6, 1936
[Syllabus from pages 463-465 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and David E. Hudson, of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 466-469 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Frederick B. Campbell and Samson Selig, both of New York City, for respondent Bank of New York and Trust Co.
Mr. Hartwell Cabell, of New York City, for intervener respondent Assecuranz Union von 1865.
Mr. Robert J. Sykes, of New York City, for respondent President and Directors of the Manhattan Co.
Mr. John M. Downes, of New York City, for respondent Pink.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Bank of the United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
46 U.S. 382
United States v. Bank of the United States

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Company (222 U.S. 8)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
222 U.S. 8
United States v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Company
Argued: October 19, 1911. --- Decided: October 30, 1911
Solicitor General Lehmann for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. George Hoadly, A. W. Goldsmith, Edward Colston, and Judson Harmon for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 9-11 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Baltimore Post/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
268 U.S. 388
United States v. Baltimore Post
Argued: April 16 and 17, 1925. ---
This case comes here from a judgment of the lower court dismissing the indictment (D. C.) 2 F. (2d) 761, and is the same in all respects as No. 768, United States v. Dickey et al., 268 U.S. 378, 45 S.C.t. 558, 69 L. Ed. --, just decided.
Upon that authority the judgment below is affirmed.
Mr. Justice STONE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Baltimore Post

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
268 U.S. 388
United States v. Baltimore Post
Argued: April 16 and 17, 1925. ---
Mr. James M. Beck, Asst. Atty. Gen., and
The Attorney General, for the United States.
Mr. Newton D. Baker, of Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 16

Chap. XVI.—An Act making appropriation for defraying the expense of a negotiation with the British government, to ascertain the boundary line between the United States and Upper Canada.
Specific appropriation for the expenses of establishing the boundary line between the U. States and Upper Canada.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That a sum not exceeding ten thousand dollars be, and the same is hereby appropriated, payable out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated, to defray the expense which shall be incurred in negotiating with the government of Great Britain, for ascertaining and establishing the boundary line between the United States and the British province of Upper Canada; when the President of the United States shall deem it expedient to commence such negotiation.
Approved, April 3, 1802.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 21

Chap. XXI.—An Act for the relief of the Marshals of certain districts therein mentioned.
Compensation for taking the census to be apportioned. 1800, ch. 12.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of the Treasury be, and he hereby is authorized and directed to apportion to the several marshals of the districts of Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania, respectively, who have been employed or concerned in taking the late census, the compensation allowed by the “Act providing for the second census or enumeration of the inhabitants of the United States,” according to the service each may have performed.
Approved, April 14, 1802.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 22

Chap. XXII.—An Act to authorize an advance of money to Samuel Dexter.
Specific appropriation.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of the Treasury be, and he is hereby authorized and directed to advance out of any money in the treasury, not otherwise appropriated, the sum of five hundred dollars to Samuel Dexter, for the purpose of assisting him in defraying the expenses of the suit of Joseph Hodgson against him in the circuit court of the district of Columbia, he, the said Dexter, to be accountable for the same.
Approved, April 14, 1802.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 23

Chap. XXIII.—An Act declaring the assent of Congress to an act of the General Assembly of Virginia therein mentioned.
Act relative to the improvement of the Appomatox, assented to.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the assent of Congress is hereby given and declared to an act of the general assembly of Virginia, intituled “An act to amend and reduce into one, the several acts of assembly for improving the navigation of Appomatox river, from Broadway to Pocahontas bridge.”
Approved, April 14, 1802.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 15

Chap. XV.—An Act making a partial appropriation for the support of government, during the year one thousand eight hundred and two.
Appropriation.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the sum of one hundred thousand dollars, to be paid out of any monies in the treasury, not otherwise appropriated, shall be, and the same hereby is appropriated towards defraying the expenditure of the civil list, including the contingent expenses of the several departments, during the year one thousand eight hundred and two.
Approved, April 2, 1802.