OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Argosy All-Story Weekly/1925
### April 18

Internet Archive identifier: argosy-v-168-n-02-1925-04-18

### June 13

Internet Archive identifier: argosy-v-169n-04-1925-06-13

### June 27

Internet Archive identifier: argosy-v-169n-06-1925-06-27-virtualnewsstand

### July 4

Internet Archive identifier: argosy-all-story-weekly-v-170-n-01-1925-07-04

### July 11

Internet Archive identifier: argosy-all-story-weekly-v-170-n-02-1925-07-11

### October 24

Internet Archive identifier: argosy-v-172n-05-1925-10-24

### October 31

Internet Archive identifier: argosy-v-172-n-06-1925-10-31

### November 7

Internet Archive identifier: argosy-v-173-n-01-1925-11-07

### November 28

Internet Archive identifier: argosy-v-173-n-04-1925-11-28

### December 19

Internet Archive identifier: argosy-v-174n-01-1925-12-19-ibc-bc-damaged
# Argosy All-Story Weekly/1927
### February 12

Internet Archive identifier: argosy-all-story-weekly-v-184-n-01-1927-02-12-missing-ibc-bc
* Thundering Dawns [Part 1 of 3] · Will McMorrow · sl
* The Bad Part of a Good Thing · Pat Costello · pm
* The Parasite · Beatrice Ashton Vandegrift · pm
* The Meanest Man · John D. Swain · nv
* A Venetian Tragedy · Strickland Gillilan · pm
* The Crucible [Part 2 of 5] · Sinclair Murray · sl
* St. Valentine’s Eve · Amanda B. Hall · pm The Cavalier February 14 1914
* The Masked Enchantress · A. T. Locke · ss
* The Mark of the Moccasin [Part 3 of 4] · Kenneth Perkins · sl
* An 800 to 1 Shot · Gordon Stiles · ss
* The Winding Road · Lester R. Cash · pm
* Alkali [Part 5 of 5] · Charles Francis Coe · sl
* All the Year Round for Him! · S. Omar Barker · pm
* In the Saddle of Bronco King · Garret Smith · ss
* Mettle · Jane Burr · pm All-Story Weekly October 30 1915
* When a Turkey’s an Elephant · John H. Thompson · ss
* Sea Voices · Edgar Daniel Kramer · pm
* Ten Minutes for Tea · Helen A. Holden · ss
* The Reader’s Viewpoint · [The Readers] · lc

### June 4

(transcription project)
* Far Gold [Part 1 of 6] · Arthur Hunt Chute · sl
* Poppy-Time · Pat Costello · pm
* The Drowned Captain · George Jay Smith · pm
* El Perro’s Report · Kenneth Perkins · nv
* The Mysterious Stranger [Part 2 of 4] · The Author of “The Seal of Satan” (by Fred MacIsaac) · sl
* Recognition · John Hopper · ss
* My Dog · Steve Hogan · pm
* Harlequinade [Part 5 of 6] · Elizabeth York Miller · sl
* One Man’s Meat— · Ben Conlon · ss
* Double Indemnity [Part 3 of 3] · C. C. Waddell · sl
* Cinemagic · Robert Leslie Bellem · pm
* For a Rainy Day · F. St. Mars · ss
* The Polecat · Laurance M. Hare · ss
* The Reader’s Viewpoint · [The Readers] · lc
# Argosy All-Story Weekly

A fiction serial formed from the merger of Argosy and All-Story Weekly in 1920, being renamed Argosy in 1929
Argosy All-Story Weekly by Year :
| 1920s | 1920 | 1921 | 1922 | 1923 | 1924 | 1925 | 1926 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Argosy All-Story Weekly/1923
### January 13

Internet Archive identifier: argosy-v-148-n-04-1923-01-13-missing-ifc-ibc-bc

### September 8

Internet Archive identifier: ArgosyAllStoryWeeklyV154n0219230908

### October 6

Internet Archive identifier: argosy-v-154n-06-1923-10-06-jvh-beb
# Anti-Slavery and Reform Papers

ANTI-SLAVERY AND REFORM PAPERS
BY HENRY D. THOREAU
Selected and Edited BY H. S. SALT.
LONDON: SWAN SONNENSCHEIN & CO., PATERNOSTER SQUARE. 1890.
Butler & Tanner, The Selwood Printing Works, Frome, and London.
CONTENTS.
* PAGE
* Introductory Note................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................1
* Civil Disobedience................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................21
* A Plea for Captain John Brown................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................51
* The Last Days of John Brown................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................82
* Paradise (to be) Regained................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................91
* Life without Principle................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................115
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Anti-Syllabus and Tom Strang Killed

No. 1 in the Labor Library
LABOR LIBRARY.
Anti-Syllabus
AND
Tom Strang Killed.
Two thrilling facts for wage-slaves.
If Socialism were the law in America, every worker would get at least four times his present wages for half his present work. Don't you call that practical politics?—"Justice."
Entered at the Post Office, New York city, as second-class matter.
New York. JULIUS BORDOLLO AND COMPANY, 705 Broadway.
1886.
page
MEN OF LABOR.
—The Poet Shelley's Address to the Men of England.
Wage-Laborers of all Countries, Unite!
Not until the laborers control the political as well as the economical forces can they enjoy the fruits of their labor.
You must support the labor press, start free labor reading-rooms and libraries, read labor literature, educate yourselves, study the labor problem, hear both sides, think and Judge for yourselves, look at the capitalistic press with a critical and distrusting eye, emancipate yourselves from both the old corrupt and decayed political parties, freely discuss the wage-system in labor lyceums, and you will convince yourselves that the
SOCIALISTIC LABOR PARTY
will be the future party in all civilized countries, having as its only opponent the capitalists and their satellites.
JOIN THE SOCIALISTIC LABOR PARTY.
For more particulars, address or call at the
National Executive Committee, S. L. P.,
56 EAST FOURTH STREET,
New York City.
Platform and constitution mailed free to any address, on application.
* Anti-Syllabus
* Tom Strang Killed
* End Matter
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Avendano v. Gay/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
75 U.S. 376
Avendano v. Gay
In order to show error in the proceedings in the Circuit Court, the counsel of the plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff below, has referred to a bill of exceptions taken by the defendant to the ruling of the court admitting evidence, offered by plaintiff against defendant's objection. If there was error in the ruling, it was at plaintiff's request, and to the prejudice of defendant, and can form no ground of reversing the judgment, which, notwithstanding this testimony, was for the defendant.
Counsel also attempts to impugn the judgment, as not being supported by the facts of the case, and relies on what purports to be a statement of the facts found by the court. But the statement is filed in the court several days after the issue and service of the writ of error in this case, and is, therefore, a nullity, as we decided in the case of Generes v. Bonnemer.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Avent v. North Carolina/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
373 U.S. 375
Avent v. North Carolina
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for consideration in the light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244, 83 S.Ct. 1119. Patterson v. Alabama, 294 U.S. 600, 55 S.Ct. 575, 79 L.Ed. 1082.
[For opinion of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, see 373 U.S. 248, 83 S.Ct. 1133.]

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Avent v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
266 U.S. 127
Avent v. United States
Argued: Oct. 9, 1924. --- Decided: Nov 17, 1924
Mr. Frank E. Wood, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 127-129 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Blackburn Esterline, of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Averted Malefice

1912.
Where mandrakes, crying from the moonless fen, Told how a witch, with eyes of owl or bat, Found, and each root maleficently fat Pulled for her waiting cauldron, on my ken Upstole, escaping to the world of men, A vapor as of some infernal vat; Across the stars it clomb, and caught thereat As if their bright regard to veil again.
Despite the web, methought they knew, appalled, The stealthier weft in which all sound was still. . . . Then sprang, as if the night found breath anew A wind whereby the stars were disenthralled. . . . Far off, I heard the cry of frustrate ill, A witch that wailed above her curdled brew.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1961, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 62 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Avendano v. Gay

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
75 U.S. 376
Avendano v. Gay
ERROR to the Circuit Court of Louisiana.
Avendano brought suit in the court below against Gay; and, in the course of the trial, offered certain evidence, which was objected to by the defendant, but which was admitted, notwithstanding, by the court. The defendant excepted, and a bill of exceptions was sealed. A verdict was given against the plaintiffs, who brought the case here on error. The writ of error was allowed on the 9th of July, 1867. The citation was issued on the 10th, and served on the 11th. On the 16th of July, a 'statement of facts,' by the judge who heard the case, was filed, and the cause in this state was here.
Mr. Durant, for the plaintiff in error, referring to the action of the court below in admitting the evidence, contended, that upon the case, as found by the court below, the judgment ought to be reversed.
Mr. Janin, contra, observing that the admission of the evidence was on the plaintiff's own offer, relied on Generes v. Bonnemer, as disposing of the case; quoting the following passage: 'To permit the judge to make a statement of facts, on which the case shall be heard here, after the case is removed to this court by the service of the writ of error, or even after it is issued, would place the rights of parties, who have judgments of record, entirely in the power of the judge, without hearing and without remedy. The statement of facts, filed without consent of the parties, must be treated as a nullity; and, as there is nothing of which error of the court below can be predicated, the judgment must be affirmed.'
Mr. Justice MILLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

* ↑ 7 Wallace, 564.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Avent v. North Carolina

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
373 U.S. 375
Avent v. North Carolina
Jack Greenberg, New York City, for petitioners.
Ralph Moody, Raleigh, N. C., for respondent.
Solicitor General Archibald Cox, for the United States, as amicus curiae, by special leave of Court.
On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Avery v. Midland County/Dissent Stewart

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Harlan Fortas Stewart
* Wikipedia article
United States Supreme Court
390 U.S. 474
Avery v. Midland County
Argued: Nov. 14, 1967. --- Decided: April 1, 1968
Mr. Justice STEWART, dissenting.
I would dismiss the writ as improvidently granted for the reasons stated by Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice FORTAS.
Since the Court does reach the merits, however, I add that I agree with most of what is said in the thorough dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice FORTAS. Indeed, I would join that opinion were it not for the author's unquestioning endorsement of the doctrine of Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 84 S.Ct. 1362, 12 L.Ed.2d 506. I continue to believe that the Court's opinion in that case misapplied the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment that the apportionment of the legislative body of a sovereign State, no less than the apportionment of a county government, is far too subtle and complicated a business to be resolved as a matter of constitutional law in terms of sixth-grade arithmetic. My views on that score, set out at length elsewhere, closely parallel those expressed by Mr. Justice FORTAS in the present case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region/Chapter VIII

​Chapter VIII: Interpretation and Amendment of the Basic Law
Article 158
The power of interpretation of this Law shall be vested in the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress.
The Standing Committee of the National People's Congress shall authorize the courts of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region to interpret on their own, in adjudicating cases, the provisions of this Law which are within the limits of the autonomy of the Region.
The courts of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region may also interpret other provisions of this Law in adjudicating cases. However, if the courts of the Region, in adjudicating cases, need to interpret the provisions of this Law concerning affairs which are the responsibility of the Central People's Government, or concerning the relationship between the Central Authorities and the Region, and if such interpretation will affect the judgments on the cases, the courts of the Region shall, before making their final judgments which are not appealable, seek an interpretation of the relevant provisions from the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress through the Court of Final Appeal of the Region. When the Standing Committee makes an interpretation of the provisions concerned, the courts of the Region, in applying those provisions, shall follow the interpretation of the Standing Committee. However, judgments previously rendered shall not be affected.
The Standing Committee of the National People's Congress shall consult its Committee for the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region before giving an interpretation of this Law.
Article 159
The power of amendment of this Law shall be vested in the National People's Congress.
​The power to propose bills for amendments to this Law shall be vested in the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, the State Council and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Amendment bills from the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be submitted to the National People's Congress by the delegation of the Region to the National People's Congress after obtaining the consent of two-thirds of the deputies of the Region to the National People's Congress, two-thirds of all the members of the Legislative Council of the Region, and the Chief Executive of the Region.
Before a bill for amendment to this Law is put on the agenda of the National People's Congress, the Committee for the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall study it and submit its views.
No amendment to this Law shall contravene the established basic policies of the People's Republic of China regarding Hong Kong.
# Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region/Chapter IV/Section 5

​Section 5: District Organizations
Article 97
District organizations which are not organs of political power may be established in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, to be consulted by the government of the Region on district administration and other affairs, or to be responsible for providing services in such fields as culture, recreation and environmental sanitation.
Article 98
The powers and functions of the district organizations and the method for their formation shall be prescribed by law.
# Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region/Chapter IX

​Chapter IX: Supplementary Provisions
Article 160
Upon the establishment of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the laws previously in force in Hong Kong shall be adopted as laws of the Region except for those which the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress declares to be in contravention of this Law. If any laws are later discovered to be in contravention of this Law, they shall be amended or cease to have force in accordance with the procedure as prescribed by this Law.
Documents, certificates, contracts, and rights and obligations valid under the laws previously in force in Hong Kong shall continue to be valid and be recognized and protected by the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, provided that they do not contravene this Law.
# Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region/Chapter V/Section 2

​Section 2: Land Leases
Article 120
All leases of land granted, decided upon or renewed before the establishment of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region which extend beyond 30 June 1997. and all rights in relation to such leases, shall continue to be recognized and protected under the law of the Region.
​Article 121
As regards all leases of land granted or renewed where the original leases contain no right of renewal, during the period from 27 May 1985 to 30 June 1997, which extend beyond 30 June 1997 and expire not later than 30 June 2047, the lessee is not required to pay an additional premium as from 1 July 1997, but an annual rent equivalent to 3 per cent of the rateable value of the property at that date, adjusted in step with any changes in the rateable value thereafter, shall be charged.
Article 122
In the case of old schedule lots, village lots, small houses and similar rural holdings, where the property was on 30 June 1984 held by, or, in the case of small houses granted after that date, where the property is granted to, a lessee descended through the male line from a person who was in 1898 a resident of an established village in Hong Kong, the previous rent shall remain unchanged so long as the property is held by that lessee or by one of his lawful successors in the male line.
Article 123
Where leases of land without a right of renewal expire after the establishment of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, they shall be dealt with in accordance with laws and policies formulated by the Region on its own.
# Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region/Chapter V/Section 3

​Section 3: Shipping
Article 124
The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall maintain Hong Kong's previous systems of shipping management and shipping regulation, including the system for regulating conditions of seamen.
The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall, on its own, define its specific functions and responsibilities in respect of shipping.
​Article 125
The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be authorized by the Central People's Government to continue to maintain a shipping register and issue related certificates under its legislation, using the name "Hong Kong, China".
Article 126
With the exception of foreign warships, access for which requires the special permission of the Central People's Government, ships shall enjoy access to the ports of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in accordance with the laws of the Region.
Article 127
Private shipping businesses and shipping-related businesses and private container terminals in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region may continue to operate freely.