OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Beaupleader Act 1275

* related portals: England.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Part of the First Statute of Westminster
STATUTUM WEST' PRIMUM. The Statute of WESTMINSTER, the First, Made at Westminster 25 die Aprilis, Anno 3 EDWARDI I. and Anno Dom. 1275.
Beaupleader Act 1275
1275 (3 Edw. 1) C A P. VIII.
THESE be the Acts of King EDWARD, Son to King HENRY, made at Westminster at his first Parliament general after his Coronation, on the Mondayof Easter Utas, the third Year of his Reign, by his Council, and the Assent of Archbishops, Bishops, Abbots, Priors, Earls, Barons, and all the Commonalty of the Realm being thither summoned, because our Lord the King had great Zeal and Desire to redress the State of the Realm in such Things as required Amendment, for the common Profit of holy Church, and of the Realm: And because the State of the holy Church had been evil kept, and the Prelates and religious Persons of the Land grieved many ways, and the People otherwise intreated than they ought to be, and the Peace less kept, and the Laws less used, and the Offenders less punished than they ought to be, by reason where of the People of the Land feared the less to offend; the King hath ordained and established these Acts underwritten, which he intendeth to be necessary and profitable unto the whole Realm.
Nothing shall be taken for Beaupleader.
2 Inst. 171. 52 H. 3. c. 11.
Enforced by 1 Ed. 3. stat. 2. c. 8. Regist. 179.
AND that nothing be taken for Fair Pleading, as hath been prohibited heretofore in the Time of King HENRY, Father to our Lord the King that now is.
Note : this act is listed in the Chronological Table of Statutes as the Beaupleader Act, 1275
This work is in the public domain worldwide because it was created by a public body of the United Kingdom with Crown Status and commercially published before 1974.
See Crown copyright artistic works, Crown copyright non-artistic works and List of Public Bodies with Crown Status.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Beaupre v. Noyes (138 U.S. 397)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
138 U.S. 402
BEAUPRE et al. v. NOYES et al., (two cases.)
The contention of the plaintiffs in error is that by the statutes of the territory of Montana, above quoted, the alleged assignment by Young to Winchester was conclusively fraudulent as to them for the want of the immediate delivery, followed by an actual and continued change of possession of the goods assigned; that their right to so treat the assignment, although such right was specially set up and claimed, was denied; and that, consequently, they were denied a right arising under an authority exercised under the United States. Whether the state court so interpreted the territorial statute as to deny such right to the plaintiffs in error we need not inquire, for it proceeded, in part, upon another and distinct ground, not involving any federal question, and sufficient, in itself, to maintain the judgment, without reference to that question. That ground is that there was evidence tending to show that the defendants acquiesced it and assented to all that was done, and waived any irregularity in the mode in which the assignee conducted the business; and that the question whether the defendants so acquiesced and assented with knowledge of all the facts, and thereby waived their right to treat the assignment as frauduient, was properly submitted to the jury. The state court evidently intended to hold that, even if the assignment was originally fraudulent, as against the creditors, by reason of Young remaining in the store as clerk for Winchester, and assisting the latter in carrying on the business, it was competent for the plain tiffs in error to waive the fraud and treat the assignment as valid for all the purposes specified in it. That view does not involve a federal question. Whether sound or not, we do not inquire. It is broad enough, in itself, to support the final judgment, without reference to the federal question, and for that reason the judgment must be affirmed.
The case of Beaupre v. Noyes, No. 159, is the same case, in respect to the issues and facts, as the above case. It is a writ of error to review the udg ment of the supreme court of the state affirming the order of the court of original jurisdiction refusing a new trial in the above action. This writ was sued out upon the theory that the donial of a new trial might be regarded as a final judgment of the state court within the meaning of the act of congress. But, clearly, this court has no jurisdiction to review such an order. The writ of error in case 159 must therefore be dismissed.
I. V. D. Heard, for plaintiffs in error.
C. K. Davis, for defendants in error.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Beauregard v. City of New Orleans

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
59 U.S. 497
Beauregard v. City of New Orleans
THIS was an appeal from the circuit court of the United States, for the eastern district of Louisiana.
It was a bill filed by Madame Emilie Poultney, in her lifetime, against the city of New Olreans, and about eight hundred and fifty other parties, some of whom included a number of persons, such as the Presbyterian Church, Bank of the United States, &c. &c.
The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
In November, 1854, the circuit court dismissed the bill, and the complainant appealed to this court.
It was argued by Mr. Henderson, for the appellants, and Mr. Taylor, for the appellees.
Mr. Justice CAMPBELL delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Beauties of Glasgow

The date is estimated. The probable date of printing is given as 1804-1819 in the catalogue of the National Library of Scotland.
Beauties of Glasgow;
To which are added, BONNY JESSIE,
AND
FY GAR RUB HER O'ER WI' STRAE.
GLASGOW: Published and Sold Wholesale and Retail, by
R. Hutchison, 10 Saltmarket.
* Beauties of Glasgow
* Bonny Jessie
* Fy gar rub her o'er wi' strae
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Beauregard at Manassas

Beauregard
at
Manassas.
Now glory to the Lord of Hosts, oh, bless and praise His name, That hath battled in our cause, and brought out foes to shame; And honor to our Beauregard, who conquered in His might, And for our children’s children, won Manassas’ bloody fight. Oh, let our thankful prayers ascend, our joyous praise resound, For God, the god of victory, our untried flag hath crowned,
They brought a mighty army to crush us with a blow, And in their pride they laughed to scorn the men they did not know; Fair women came to triumph with the heroes of the day, When the boasting Southern Rebels should be scattered in dismay; And for their conquering Generals lordly feasts were spread; But the wine in which we pledged them was all of ruby red.
The feast was like Belshazzar’s—in terror and dismay— Before our conquering heroes their Generals ran away; God hath weighed them in the balance, and his hand upon the wall At the taking of Fort Sumter, hath foredoomed them in their fall; But they would not heed the warning; and scoffed in unbelief, Till their scorn was turned to wailing, and their laughter into grief.
All day the fight was raging, and amid the cannon’s peal, Rang the crack of our rifles, and the clashing of our steel; But once our spirits faltered, Bee and Bartow both were down, And our gallant Col. Hampton lay wounded on the ground; But Beauregard—God bless him! led the legion in his stead, And Johnston seized the colors, and waved them o’er his head; E’en a coward must have followed, when such heroes led the way, And no dastard blood was flowing in Southern veins that day.
Every arm was strengthened and every heart was stirred, When shouts of Davis! Davis! along our lines were heard; As he rode into the battle, the joyous news flew fast; And the dying raised their voices and cheered him as he passed; Oh! with such glorious leaders in Cabinet and in field, The gallant Southern chivalry will die, but never yield!
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# CSRT Summary of Evidence memo for Fadil Husayn Salih Hintif

Wikified from page 67 of http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_mar05.pdf, on April 21, 2007.
259 UNCLASSIFIED COMBATANT STATUS REVIEW BOARD
| To: | Personal Representative |
| From: | OIC, CSRT (25 October 2004) |
| Subject: | Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal [ (b)(6) ] |
| 1. | Under the provisions of the Secretary of the Navy Memorandum, dated 29 July 2004, Implementation of Combatant Status Review Tribunal Procedures for Enemy Combatants Detained at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base Cuba, a Tribunal has been appointed to review the detainee's designation as an enemy combatant. |
| 2. | An enemy combatant has been defined as "an individual who was part of or supporting the Taliban or al Qaida forces, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. This included any person who committed a belligerent act or has directly supported hostilities in aid of enemy armed forces." |
| 3. | The United States Government has previously determined that the detainee is an enemy combatant. This determination is based on information possessed by the United States that indicates that he is associated with the Taliban and al Qaida: |
| | a. The detainee is associated with the Taliban and al Qaida: 1. The detainee arrived in Afghanistan from Yemen, via Pakistan. 2. The detainee claims to be Red Crescent volunteer, but cannot provide much information on city layout or known associates. 3. The detainee was captured near the border of Pakistan while crossing from Afghanistan. 4. The detainee was captured while in possession of a Casio watch model that has been used in bombings linked to al Qaida and radical Islamic terrorist groups with improvised explosive devices. 5. The detainee stayed at several Taliban safehouses. 6. The detainee's name appears on a list recovered from an al Qaida safehouse. |
| 4. | The detainee has the opportunity to contest his designation as an enemy combatant. The Tribunal will endeavor to arrange for the presence of any reasonably available witnesses or evidence that the detainee desires to call or introduce to prove that he is not an enemy combatant. The Tribunal President will determine the reasonable availability of availability of evidence or witnesses. |
265 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-1
# CSRT Summary of Evidence memo for Hisham Bin Ali Bin Amor Sliti

* related portals: Guantanamo.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Wikified from page 62 of http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_mar05.pdf#62, and page 78 of http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/000101-000200.pdf#78
174 UNCLASSIFIED COMBATANT STATUS REVIEW BOARD
| To: | Personal Representative |
| From: | OIC, CSRT (19 November 2004) |
| Subject: | Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal - Hisham Bin Ali Bin Amor Sliti |
| 1. | Under the provisions of the Secretary of the Navy Memorandum, dated 29 July 2004, Implementation of Combatant Status Review Tribunal Procedures for Enemy Combatants Detained at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base Cuba, a Tribunal has been appointed to review the detainee's designation as an enemy combatant. |
| 2. | An enemy combatant has been defined as "an individual who was part of or supporting the Taliban or al Qaida forces, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. This included any person who committed a belligerent act or has directly supported hostilities in aid of enemy armed forces." |
| 3. | The United States Government has previously determined that the detainee is an enemy combatant. This determination is based on information possessed by the United States that indicates that he is a member of the Taliban. |
| | a. The detainee is associated with the Taliban and al Qaida: Originally from Hamam Lif, Tunisia, the detainee traveled to Jalalabad, Afghanistan via Italy; Belgium; Paris, France; London, England; Islamabad, Pakistan; and Peshawar, Pakistan. The detainee was aided in his travels from Belgium to Afghanistan by a known Belgian-based Islamic facilitator. The detainee received training on the use of light arms at the Khaldan Camp near the Khowst Province, and the Derunta Camp in Jalalabad. The detainee is associated with the Tunisian Combat Group. The Tunisian Combat Group is a terrorist organization with links to al Qaida. The detainee was associated with a group involved in providing false passports/visas to senior terrorist members as well as having promoted and facilitated their travels through several western countries. The detainee lived in a Tunisian guesthouse in Jalalabad. The Tunisian guesthouse in Jalalabad consisted of Tunisian immigrants that formed a network to train and fight against the Tunisian government. In December 2001, the detainee was arrested at the Afghanistan border, while attempting to cross into Pakistan. |
| 4. | The detainee has the opportunity to contest his designation as an enemy combatant. The Tribunal will endeavor to arrange for the presence of any reasonably available witnesses or evidence that the detainee desires to call or introduce to prove that he is not an enemy combatant. The Tribunal President will determine the reasonable availability of availability of evidence or witnesses. |
260 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-1

## Footnotes

* ↑ When this document was first released, in March 2005, the location "Hamam Lif, Tunisia", was redacted.
# CSRT Summary of Evidence memo for Ibrahim Muhammed Ibrahim Al Nasir

Wikified from page 57 of http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_mar05.pdf, on April 19, 2007.
271 UNCLASSIFIED COMBATANT STATUS REVIEW BOARD
| To: | Personal Representative |
| From: | OIC, CSRT (16 November 2004) |
| Subject: | Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal [ (b)(6) ] |
| 1. | Under the provisions of the Secretary of the Navy Memorandum, dated 29 July 2004, Implementation of Combatant Status Review Tribunal Procedures for Enemy Combatants Detained at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base Cuba, a Tribunal has been appointed to review the detainee's designation as an enemy combatant. |
| 2. | An enemy combatant has been defined as "an individual who was part of or supporting the Taliban or al Qaida forces, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. This included any person who committed a belligerent act or has directly supported hostilities in aid of enemy armed forces." |
| 3. | The United States Government has previously determined that the detainee is an enemy combatant. This determination is based on information possessed by the United States that indicates that he is a member of the Taliban. |
| | a. The detainee is associated with the Taliban: 1. The detainee, his younger brother and cousin were given 2,500 Saudi Riyals, by their recruiter, to pay for their trip to Afghanistan. 2. The detainee, after a several day stay at an al Qaida safe house, traveled with six other Arabs and a Yemeni from Jalalabad to Taloqan, Afghanistan in July 2001. 3. The detainee flew with his brother and cousin to Syria and then to Tehran, Iran then proceeded to another city in Iran in July/August 2001. 4. The detainee visited the Al Wafa director in Kabul, Afghanistan in 2001. 5. The detainee's name appears on a hand-written letter associated with al Qaida, recoverd in raids in Pakistan. 6. The detainee's name appears on a typed e-mail on al Qaida associated computer media recovered during raids in Pakistan. 7. The detainee's name and alias were found on a document listing mujahideen fighters captured in Pakistan. 8. The detainee's name, along with other personal information, was found on a list contained in a captured hard drive associated with a senior al Qaeda member. b. The detainee participated in military operations against the United States and its coalition partners. 1. The detainee was a Mujahadin fighter at Tora Bora. 2. The detainee left Kabul, Afghanistan because of the United States air bombardment, traveling to Khost and then to Jalalabad, Afghanistan. 3. The detainee was arrested by the Pakistani Police after leaving Afghanistan. |
| 4. | The detainee has the opportunity to contest his designation as an enemy combatant. The Tribunal will endeavor to arrange for the presence of any reasonably available witnesses or evidence that the detainee desires to call or introduce to prove that he is not an enemy combatant. The Tribunal President will determine the reasonable availability of availability of evidence or witnesses. |
254 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-1
# CSRT Summary of Evidence memo for Dawut Abdurehim

Wikified from page 44 of http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_mar05.pdf, on April 19, 2007.
257 UNCLASSIFIED COMBATANT STATUS REVIEW BOARD
| To: | Personal Representative |
| From: | OIC, CSRT (03 November 2004) |
| Subject: | Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal - Dawut Abdurehim |
| 1. | Under the provisions of the Secretary of the Navy Memorandum, dated 29 July 2004, Implementation of Combatant Status Review Tribunal Procedures for Enemy Combatants Detained at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base Cuba, a Tribunal has been appointed to review the detainee's designation as an enemy combatant. |
| 2. | An enemy combatant has been defined as "an individual who was part of or supporting the Taliban or al Qaida forces, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. This included any person who committed a belligerent act or has directly supported hostilities in aid of enemy armed forces." |
| 3. | The United States Government has previously determined that the detainee is an enemy combatant. This determination is based on information possessed by the United States that indicates that he is a member of the Taliban. |
| | a.The detainee is associated with al Qaida and the Taliban: 1. The detainee is ############# who traveled to Afghanistan, via Kyrgyzstan and Pakistan, to receive military training at a military training camp in the Tora Bora mountains. 2. The detainee lived at the Uighur training camp from June to October 2001. 3. The training camp was provided to the Uighers by the Taliban. 4. The East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM} operated facilities in the Tora Bora region of Afghanistan in which Uighur expatriates underwent small arms training. These camps were funded by bin Laden and the Taliban 5. ETIM is listed on the state departments terrorist exclusion list. 6. While at the camp, the detainee received training on the Kalashnikov rifle, handguns, and other weapons. 7. Following the destruction of the training camp by the United States bombing campaign, the detainee traveled to a village in Pakistan where he was captured. |
| 4. | The detainee has the opportunity to contest his designation as an enemy combatant. The Tribunal will endeavor to arrange for the presence of any reasonably available witnesses or evidence that the detainee desires to call or introduce to prove that he is not an enemy combatant. The Tribunal President will determine the reasonable availability of availability of evidence or witnesses. |
241 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-1
# CSRT Summary of Evidence memo for Bostan Karim

Wikified from page 59 of http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_mar05.pdf, on April 19, 2007.
975 UNCLASSIFIED COMBATANT STATUS REVIEW BOARD
| To: | Personal Representative |
| From: | OIC, CSRT (21 November 2004) |
| Subject: | Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal [ (b)(6) ] |
| 1. | Under the provisions of the Secretary of the Navy Memorandum, dated 29 July 2004, Implementation of Combatant Status Review Tribunal Procedures for Enemy Combatants Detained at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base Cuba, a Tribunal has been appointed to review the detainee's designation as an enemy combatant. |
| 2. | An enemy combatant has been defined as "an individual who was part of or supporting the Taliban or al Qaida forces, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. This included any person who committed a belligerent act or has directly supported hostilities in aid of enemy armed forces." |
| 3. | The United States Government has previously determined that the detainee is an enemy combatant. This determination is based on information possessed by the United States that indicates that he is a member of the Taliban and al Qaida: |
| | a. The detainee is a member of the Taliban and al Qaida: 1. Detainee was possibly identified as an al Qaida associate, planning landmine attacks in Khowst, Afghanistan. 2. Detainee was possibly identified as a person likely to have communicated with Arab al Qaida members operating in Peshawar, Afghanistan, and working directly for Arab al Qaida in the Knowst province. 3. The detainee recruited others to lay mines that would harm American and Afghan forces. 4. The detainee offered to pay others to lay mines that would harm American and Afghan forces. 5. The detainee was arrested by the Pakistani Police authorities on 13 August 2002 at the Khurgi, Pakistan checkpoint. In the detainee's possession was a Thuraya Satellite telephone, 2,700 United States Dollars, 3,600 Pakistan Rupees, and 70,000 Afghan Rupees. 6. The detainee's name appears on a typed e-mail on al Qaida associated computer media recovered during raids in Pakistan. |
| 4. | The detainee has the opportunity to contest his designation as an enemy combatant. The Tribunal will endeavor to arrange for the presence of any reasonably available witnesses or evidence that the detainee desires to call or introduce to prove that he is not an enemy combatant. The Tribunal President will determine the reasonable availability of availability of evidence or witnesses. |
256 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-1