OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Generals of the British Army/Allenby, General Sir E. H.

GENERAL SIR EDMUND ALLENBY
V
GENERAL SIR EDMUND HENRY
ALLENBY, K.C.B.
SIR EDMUND ALLENBY was born on April 23rd, 1861, and was educated at Haileybury. He entered the Inniskilling Dragoons, with whom he served in the Bechuanaland Expedition of 1884-5. He fought in Zululand in 1888, and in the South African War was a dashing and successful Column Commander. He was one of those who harried General Delarey in the difficult Magaliesberg region.
In 1910 he was promoted to the command of the 4th Cavalry Brigade, was subsequently Inspector of Cavalry, and, when the European War broke out, he was given the Cavalry Division. He fought through the Retreat from Mons and the Battle of the Marne, and after the Battle of the Aisne was promoted to the command of the Cavalry Corps. During the First Battle of Ypres he held the Messines ridge, filling the gap in the line between Sir Henry Rawlinson's yth Division and General Smith-Dorrien's II Corps.
In May, 1915, he succeeded Sir Herbert Plumer in command of the V Infantry Corps. When General Monro went to India he followed him in command of the new Third Army on the Somme.
In the spring of 1916, when Sir Henry Rawlinson's Fourth Army was formed, the Third Army was moved further north to take over the ground around Arras vacated by the French Tenth Army under D'Urbal. Only a small part of the right wing of Sir Edmund Allenby's Army was engaged during the Battle of the Somme, and that only on the first day.
During the winter of 1916-17, apart from many brilliant trench raids, there was no action upon the Third Army front. Its chance came ​on Easter Monday, 1917, when Sir Edmund Allenby commanded the right wing of the British forces in the great Battle of Arras one of the most successful actions as yet fought by British troops. It was his men who carried the intricate network of trenches east of Arras, fighting their way along the valley of the Scarpe towards Douai.
In June Sir Edmund Allenby was transferred to the command of the British forces in Egypt.
In the European War some of the most brilliant infantry leaders have come from the Cavalry—Haig, Gough, Kavanagh, Allenby. Sir Edmund is a personification of the traditional qualities of an English soldier patient, tenacious, resolute; and his record in many fields has shown that he possesses admirable military judgment and wide military knowledge.
# Generals of the British Army/Plumer, General Sir H. C. O.

GENERAL SIR HERBERT PLUMER
II
GENERAL SIR HERBERT CHARLES
ONSLOW PLUMER,
G.C.M.G., G.C.V.O., K.C.B., A.D.C.
SIR HERBERT PLUMER was born in Devon on March i3th, 1857. In 1876 he entered the York and Lancaster Regiment and served with it in the Soudan War of 1884. In South Africa, in 1896, he raised and commanded a corps of mounted rifles for service in the Matabele rebellion, being mentioned in despatches and receiving the brevet of Lieut.-Colonel. In the South African War of 1899-1902 he won his first great reputation in the field. He commanded the Rhodesian Field Force and was the first British soldier to cross the enemy frontier.
For months he attempted to reach Mafeking from the north, and, after the happy relief of that historic town, he was one of the most active and resolute of column commanders in the Transvaal. This "small, quiet, resolute man," as a historian describes him, had the power of enforcing discipline and inspiring confidence in the diverse elements under him.
In 1902 he became Major-General, and 1908 Lieut.-General. In 1904-5 he was Q.M.G. to the Forces and Third Military Member of the Army Council. In 1911-14 he was G.O.C. Northern Command.
Sir Herbert Plumer did not appear in the field in the European War till January, 1915, when he was given command of the new V Corps, holding the southern side of the Ypres Salient. When General Smith-Dorrien retired in April of that year from the command of the Second Army, Sir Herbert succeeded him. It was that Army which fought the ​Second Battle of Ypres, and has since remained on the left flank of the British front in the West. It has seen severe fighting, such as the Hooge battle of August, 1915, the advance at Hooge during the Battle of Loos in September, 1915, the struggle at the Bluff in the spring of 1916, and the action of the Canadians at Ypres in June of the same year. The Ypres Salient has become historic as the most critical part of the British line.
The Second Army was not engaged during the Battle of the Somme or the first stages of the Battle of Arras, but on Thursday, June 7th, 1917, attacking on the whole front from the Ypres salient to Ploegsteert Wood, it carried all its objectives, with the vital Wytschaete-Messines Ridge, put an end to the embarrassment of the Ypres salient, took over 7,000 prisoners, and accounted for at least 30,000 of the enemy, the whole at a small expense of British lives. The action was probably the most perfectly planned and executed in the history of the campaign.
Sir Herbert Plumer is the best type of British regular officer, an enthusiast for the historic traditions of the army, a soldier with wide experience in many lands and many different forms of campaign. His patience and stamina and perfect judgment have made him for many months a brilliant Warden of the Flanders Marches.
# Generals of the British Army

Generals of the British Army
Portraits in Colours
By FRANCIS DODD
With Introduction and Biographical Notes
PUBLISHED FROM THE OFFICES OF "COUNTRY LIFE" LTD., 20, TAVISTOCK STREET, COVENT GARDEN, LONDON AND GEORGE NEWNES, LTD., 8-11, SOUTHAMPTON STREET, STRAND, LONDON, W.C.
GENERALS
OF THE
BRITISH ARMY
Portraits in Colours by
FRANCIS DODD
With Introduction and Biographical Notes
PUBLISHED FROM THE OFFICES OF "COUNTRY LIFE," LTD.,
20, TAVISTOCK STREET, COVENT GARDEN, LONDON
MCMXVII
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
I. HAIG, FIELD MARSHAL SIR DOUGLAS, K.T., G.C.B., G.C.V.O., K.C.I.E., A.D.C.
II. PLUMER, GENERAL SIR H. C. O., G.C.M.G., G.C.V.O., K.C.B., A.D.C.
III. RAWLINSON, GENERAL SIR H. S., BART., G.C.V.O., K.C.B., K.C.V.O.
IV. GOUGH, SIR H. DE LA POER, K.C.B., K.C.V.O.
V. ALLENBY, GENERAL SIR E. H., K.C.B.
VI. HORNE, GENERAL SIR H. S., K.C.B.
VII. BIRDWOOD, LIEUT.-GEN. SIR W. R., K.C.B., K.C.S.I., K.C.M.G., C.I.E., D.S.O.
VIII. BYNG, GENERAL THE HON. SIR J. H. G., K.C.B., K.C.M.G., M.V.O.
IX. CONGREVE, LIEUT.-GEN. SIR W. N., W.C., K.C.B., M.V.O.
X. HALDANE, LIEUT.-GEN. J. A. L., C.B., D.S.O.
XI. WATTS, LIEUT.-GEN. H. E., C.B., C.M.G.
XII. SMUTS, LIEUT.-GEN. THE RT. HON. JAN C., P.C., K.C., M.L.A.
Uniform with this publication.
Admirals of the British Navy PORTRAITS BY FRANCIS DODD INTRODUCTION I. JELLICOE, ADMIRAL SIR JOHN R., G.C.B., O.M., G.C.V.O. II. ADMIRAL SIR CECIL BURNEY, G.C.M.G., K.C.B. III. MADDEN, VICE-ADMIRAL SIR C. E., K.C.B., K.C.M.G., c.v.o. IV. STURDEE, VICE-ADMIRAL SIR F. C. D., K.C.B, K.C.M.G., c.v.o. V.-BACON, VICE-ADMIRAL SIR R. H. S., K.C.B., K.C.V.O., D.S.O. VI. DE ROBECK, REAR-ADMIRAL SIR J. M., K.C.B. VII. NAPIER, VICE-ADMIRAL T. D. W., C.B., M.V.O. VIII. BROCK, REAR-ADMIRAL SIR OSMOND DE B., K.C.V.O., C.B., C.M.G. IX. HALSEY, REAR-ADMIRAL LIONEL, C.B., C.M.G. X. PAKENHAM, REAR-ADMIRAL SIR W. C., K.C.B., K.C.V.O. XL PAINE, COMMODORE GODFREY M., C.B., M.V.O. XII. TYRWHITT, COMMODORE SIR R. Y., K.C.B., D.S.O. IM A KWABM
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hail the Day That Sees Him Rise

Hail the day that sees Him rise, Alleluia! To His throne above the skies, Alleluia! Christ, awhile to mortals given, Alleluia! Reascends His native heaven, Alleluia!
There the glorious triumph waits, Alleluia! Lift your heads, eternal gates, Alleluia! Christ hath conquered death and sin, Alleluia! Take the King of glory in, Alleluia!
Circled round with angel powers, Alleluia! Their triumphant Lord, and ours, Alleluia! Conqueror over death and sin, Alleluia! “Take the King of glory in! Alleluia!”
Him though highest Heav’n receives, Alleluia! Still He loves the earth He leaves, Alleluia! Though returning to His throne, Alleluia! Still He calls mankind His own, Alleluia!
See! He lifts His hands above, Alleluia! See! He shows the prints of love, Alleluia! Hark! His gracious lips bestow, Alleluia! Blessings on His church below, Alleluia!
Still for us His death He pleads, Alleluia! Prevalent He intercedes, Alleluia! Near Himself prepares our place, Alleluia! Harbinger of human race, Alleluia!
Master, (will we ever say), Alleluia! Taken from our head to day, Alleluia! See Thy faithful servants, see, Alleluia! Ever gazing up to Thee, Alleluia!
Grant, though parted from our sight, Alleluia! Far above yon azure height, Alleluia! Grant our hearts may thither rise, Alleluia! Seeking Thee beyond the skies, Alleluia!
Ever upward let us move, Alleluia! Wafted on the wings of love, Alleluia! Looking when our Lord shall come, Alleluia! Longing, gasping after home, Alleluia!
There we shall with Thee remain, Alleluia! Partners of Thy endless reign, Alleluia! There Thy face unclouded see, Alleluia! Find our heaven of heavens in Thee, Alleluia!
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hail Virgin of Virgins

Published 1860 in Songs for Catholic Schools; this edition from here. An anonymous author revised it in 1952 into a version of the Lourdes Hymn, beginning "Immaculate Mary, thy praises we sing".
Hail, Virgin of Virgins, thy praises we sing, Thy throne is in Heaven, thy Son is its King; The Saints and the Angels thy glory proclaim, All nations devoutly bow down at thy name.
Let all sing of Mary, the Mystical Rod, The Mirror of Justice, the Handmaid of God; Let valley and mountain unite in her praise, The sea with its waters, the sun with its rays.
Let souls that are holy still holier be, To sing with the Angels, dear Mary, of thee; Let all who are sinners to virtue return, That hearts without number with thy love may burn.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hail Glorious Saint Patrick (unsourced)

Written in 1920
Hail, glorious St. Patrick, dear saint of our isle, On us thy poor children bestow a sweet smile; And now thou art high in the mansions above, On Erin's green valleys look down in thy love.
(optional repeat) On Erin's green valleys, on Erin's green valleys, On Erin's green valleys look down in thy love.
Hail, glorious St. Patrick, thy words were once strong Against Satan's wiles and a heretic throng; Not less is thy might where in Heaven thou art; Oh, come to our aid, in our battle take part!
In a war against sin, in the fight for the faith, Dear Saint, may thy children resist to the death; May their strength be in meekness, in penance, and prayer, Their banner the Cross, which they glory to bear.
Thy people, now exiles on many a shore, Shall love and revere thee till time be no more; And the fire thou hast kindled shall ever burn bright, Its warmth undiminished, undying its light.
Ever bless and defend the sweet land of our birth, Where the shamrock still blooms as when thou wert on earth, And our hearts shall yet burn, wherever we roam, For God and St. Patrick, and our native home.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hail Mary

* related portals: Christianity.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
The Hail Mary, also called Ave Maria or The Angelic Salutation, is a traditional Catholic prayer calling for the intercession of Mary, the mother of Jesus. The prayer is rooted in Biblical texts, and developed into its modern form during the Middle Ages.
See also Hail Mary on the multilingual Wikisource.
English-language translations of Ave Maria include:
* "Ave Maria" in The Little Book of the Most Holy Child Jesus, 1876.
* "The Angelic Salutation" in The Catholic Prayer Book and Manual of Meditations, 1883.
* "The Hail Mary" in A Manual of Prayers for the Use of the Catholic Laity, 1889.
* "The Angelical Salutation" in The Army and Navy Hymnal, 1920.
* "The Hail Mary" in The Rosary: Its History and How to Say It by Michael Davitt Forrest, 1926.
* "The Hail Mary" in How to Say the Rosary, 1937.
# Hail the Sign, the Sign of Jesus

Words by Sa­bine Bar­ing-Gould, first published in the Church Times, 1866. Music is called "Groom­bridge" by W. J. Whitwhell, first published in The Eng­lish Hymn­al (Lon­don: Ox­ford Un­i­ver­si­ty Press, 1906), num­ber 592.
Hail the Sign, the Sign of Jesus, Bright and royal Tree! Standard of the Monarch, planted First on Calvary!
 Refrain  Hail the Sign all signs excelling,  Hail the Sign all ills dispelling,  Hail the Sign hell’s power quelling,  Cross of Christ, all hail!
Sign the martyrs’ strength and refuge, Sign to saints so dear! Sign of evil men abhorrèd, Sign which devils fear:
 Refrain
Sign which, when the Lord returneth, In the heavens shall be; Sinners quail, while saints with rapture Shall the vision see:
 Refrain
Lo, I sign the Cross of Jesus Meekly on my breast; May it guard my heart when living, Dying be its rest:
 Refrain
In the name of God the Father, Name of God the Son, Name of God the blessèd Spirit, Ever Three in One:
 Refrain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1924, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 99 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar/149. Sentences which express an Oath or Asseveration

Layout 2
a The particle אִם, in the sense of certainly not, and אִם־לֹא (rarely כִּי Gn 22) in the sense of certainly, are used to introduce promises or threats confirmed by an oath (especially after such formulae as חַי־יְהֹוָה, ​חֵֽי־נַפְשְׁךָ, חַי אָ֫נִי, בִּי נִשְׁבַּ֫עְתִּי, &c., as well as after imprecations, see below), and also simple asseverations, e.g. 1 S 2, 2 S 20, Jb 27 after חָלִ֫ילָה לִי far be it from me, but mostly without any introductory formula.
b Rem. No certain explanation of these particles has yet been given. According to the usual view, phrases expressing an oath depend on the suppression of an imprecation upon oneself, e.g. the Lord do so unto me, if I do it equivalent to I certainly will not do it; then naturally אִם־לֹא properly if I do it not equivalent to I certainly will do it. It is indeed difficult to understand such self-imprecations, put into the mouth of God, as in Dt 1 f., Is 14, 22, Jer 22, Ez 3, 35, ψ 95. Possibly, however, the consciousness of the real meaning of the formula was lost at an early period, and אִם־לֹא simply came to express verily, אִם verily not.—In 1 S 25, where, instead of a self-imprecation, a curse is pronounced upon others, read לְדָוִד with the Lxx for לְאֹֽיְבֵי דָוִד.
Examples:—
c (a) The particles אִם and אִם־לֹא used after the utterance of an oath and after formulae of swearing, e.g. 2 S 11 (see note on $^a$) חַי־יְהֹוָה וְחֵי נַפְשֶׁ֫ךָ אִם־אִֽעֱשֶׂה אֶת־הַדָּבָר הַזֶּה as the Lord liveth, and as thy soul liveth, I will not do this thing; 1 S 14, 2 K 5 (after חַי יְהֹוָה; in 1 S 14 and 29:6 חַי־י׳ is followed by a simple כִּי); Ct 2, 3 (after הִשְׁבַּ֫עְתִּי I adjure you); cf. also Gn 14, 21, 26; spoken by God, Dt 1 f., 1 S 3, ψ 95; similarly אִם־לֹא Gn 24 f.; spoken by God, Is 14, where אִם־לֹא occurs first with the perfect in the sense of a prophetic perfect, § 106 n, but in the parallel clause with the imperfect; Jer 22$_6$; in Gn 31 the negative oath introduced by אִם־אָ֫נִי, אִם־אַתָּה is immediately afterwards continued by לֹא with the imperfect.—In Ez 34 the threat introduced in verse 8 by אִם־לֹא is, after a long parenthesis, resumed with הִנְנִי.
d (b) אִם and אִם־לֹא after formulae of cursing, e.g. 1 S 3 כֹּה יַֽעֲשֶׂה־לְּךָ אֱלֹהִים וְכֹה יוֹסִיף אִם־תְּכַחֵד מִמֶּ֫נִּי דָבָר וג׳ God do so to thee, and more also! thou shalt not hide anything from me, &c.; cf. 1 S 25. On the other hand, כִּי follows the curse, in 1 S 14, 1 K 2 (here with a perfect), and in 2 S 3 כִּי אִם; in 1 S 25 the preceding כִּי is repeated before אִם; in 1 S 20 the purport of the asseveration is repeated (after the insertion of a conditional sentence) in the perfect consecutive.
e (c) אִם and אִם־לֹא as simple particles of asseveration, e.g. Ju 5 מָגֵן אִם־ֵי֥רָאֶה וָרֹמַח וג׳ truly, there was not a shield and spear seen, &c., Is 22, Jb 6 (in the middle of the sentence); after חָלִ֫ילָה חָלִ֫ילָה absit, 2 S 20; אִם־לֹא with the imperf. Is 5, with the perfect, Jb 22.
# Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar/148. Exclamations

Layout 2
II. Special Kinds of Sentences.
a The originally interrogative מָה is used to introduce exclamations of wonder or indignation = O how! or ridicule, why! how! sometimes strengthened by זֶה or זֹאת according to § 136 c.—Astonishment or indignation at something which has happened is introduced by אֵיךְ how (likewise originally interrogative) with the perfect; the indignant refusal of a demand by אֵיךְ (but also by מָה Jb 31) with the imperfect; an exclamation of lamentation by אֵיכָה, less frequently אֵיךְ how!; in Jo 1 by מָה.
Examples:—
b מָה (or מַה־ with a following Dagĕš, see § 37) expressing admiration (or astonishment) before verbal-clauses, e.g. Gn 27 (מַה־זֶּה); 38:29, Nu 24 (how goodly are...!); ψ 21, Ct 7; before the predicate of noun-clauses, e.g. Gn 28, ψ 8; mockingly before the verb, 2 S 6 (how glorious was...!); Jer 22, Jb 26 f.; indignantly, Gn 3 מַה־וֹּאת; 4:10, 20:9, 31:26 what hast thou done!
אֵיךְ with the perfect, e.g. Gn 26, ψ 73; in scornful exclamation, Is 14, 12; in a lament (usually אֵיכָה), 2 S 1, 27; with the imperfect, in a reproachful question, Gn 39, 44, ψ 11, 137; in a mocking imitation of lament, Mi 2.
אֵיכָה with the perfect, Is 1, La 1; with the imperfect, La 2, 4.
c Rem. 1. The close relation between a question and an exclamation appears also in the interrogative personal pronoun מִי in such cases as Mi 7 מִי־אֵל כָּמ֫וֹךָ who is a God like unto thee? and so in general in rhetorical questions as the expression of a forcible denial; similarly in the use of an interrogative sentence to express a wish, see § 150 d, 151 a.
d 2. A weaker form of exclamation is sometimes produced by the insertion of a corroborative כִּי verily, surely, before the predicate, Gn 18; cf. 33:11, Is 7, and the analogous cases in the apodoses of conditional sentences, § 159 ee.
# Hardin v. Kentucky Utilities Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
390 U.S. 1
Hardin, Mayor of Tazewell, et al. v. Kentucky Utilities Co.
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
No. 40. Argued: December 13, 1967 --- Decided: January 16, 1968
Respondent, a private utility company, sued to enjoin the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) from supplying TVA power in alleged violation of § 15d of the TVA Act for use in two small Tennessee towns where, as of July 1, 1957, respondent had supplied 94% of the electric power and TVA 6%. At that time TVA supplied 62% of the power used in all Claiborne County. It supplied most of the county's rural areas, and on a relatively unprofitable basis. Respondent's retail rates in the two towns were about 2½ times those of TVA. Section 15d of the Act bars TVA from expanding sales outside "the area for which [it] or its distributors were the primary source of power on July 1, 1957." The District Court upheld the determination of the TVA Board of Directors that Claiborne County as a whole constituted TVA's primary service "area" and dismissed the action. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the towns and a narrow corridor between them and respondent's main service area in nearby Kentucky constituted the "area." Both courts ruled against petitioner's contention that the respondent lacked standing to sue.
Held:
    1. Respondent, being within the class of private utilities which § 15d, is designed to protect from TVA competition, has standing to maintain this suit. Pp. 5-7.
    2. TVA's determination that Claiborne County constituted the primary service "area" within the meaning of § 15d should be upheld since it was within the range of permissible choices contemplated by the Act and had reasonable economic and technical support in relation to the statutory purpose of controlling but not altogether prohibiting TVA's territorial expansion. Pp. 8-13.
375 F. 2d 403, reversed.
William R. Stanifer argued the cause for petitioners in Nos. 40 and 50. With him on the brief for petitioners in No. 40 was Philip P. Ardery. Clyde Y. Cridlin was on the brief for petitioner in No. 50. Robert H. Marquis argued the cause for petitioner in No. 51. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Richard A. Posner, Charles J. McCarthy and Thomas A. Pedersen.
Malcolm Y. Marshall argued the cause for respondent in all three cases. With him on the brief were Squire R. Ogden and James S. Welch.

## Notes

* ↑ Together with No. 50, Powell Valley Electric Cooperative v. Kentucky Utilities Co., and No. 51, Tennessee Valley Authority v. Kentucky Utilities Co., also on certiorari to the same court.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hardenbergh v. Ray

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
151 U.S. 112
Hardenbergh v. Ray
Henry B. B. Staples and Henry W. Smith, for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 113-116 intentionally omitted]
John H. Mitchell and J. K. Kelly, for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hardin-Wyandot Lighting Company v. Village of Upper Sandusky

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
251 U.S. 173
Hardin-Wyandot Lighting Company v. Village of Upper Sandusky
Argued: Oct. 13, 1919. --- Decided: Dec 15, 1919
Messrs. H. T. Mathers and Andrew Squire, both of Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. W. R. Hare, of Upper Sandusky, Ohio, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice CLARKE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Harden worksheet

Sent to the San Francisco Chronicle, San Francisco Examiner and Vallejo Times, the cipher was eventually cracked by Donald and Bettye Harden who read it in the papers. Although his next letter said this cipher contained his name, it actually included the phrase "I will not give you my name".
The following cipher translation is transcribed from the Hardens' deciphering worksheet.
HARDEN worksheet
I LIKE KILLING PEOPLE BECAUSE IT IS SO MUCH FUN IT IS MORE FUN THAN KILLING WILD GAME IN THE FORREST BECAUSE MAN IS THE MOST DANGEROUE ANAMAL OF ALL TO KILL SOMETHING ​GIVES ME THE MOST THRILLING EXPERENCE IT IS EVEN BETTER THAN GETTING YOUR ROCKS OFF WITH A GIRL THE BEST PART OF IT IS THAT WHEN I DIE I WILL BE REBORN IN PARADISE AND ALL ​THE I HAVE KILLED WILL BECOME MY SLAVES I WILL NOT GIVE YOU MY NAME BECAUSE YOU WILL TRY TO SLOW DOWN OR STOP MY COLLECTING OF SLAVS FOR MY AFTER LIFE. EBEORIETEMETHHPITI
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.