OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Davis v. Soja

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
374 U.S. 495
Davis v. Soja
Walter J. Rockler, for petitioner.
Solicitor General Cox, for respondent.
On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Davis v. Speiden

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
104 U.S. 83
Davis v. Speiden
APPEAL from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Job Barnard and Mr. James S. Edwards for the appellant.
Mr. William F. Mattingly, contra.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Davis v. Soja/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
374 U.S. 495
Davis v. Soja
It appearing from the joint suggestion of mootness that this case is moot, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Davis v. Texas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
139 U.S. 651
Davis v. Texas
C. A. Culberson, Henry M. Furman, and Chas. H. Armes, for motion.
S. F. Phillips and Frederic D. McKenney, in opposition.
FULLER, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Davis v. State of South Carolina

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
107 U.S. 597
Davis v. State of South Carolina
Sol. Gen. Phillips, for plaintiff in error.
Ch. Richardson Miles, Atty. Gen. of South Carolina, for defendant in error.
MATTHEWS, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan/Contents

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN
CONTENTS
# Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan

* related portals: Law of Pakistan.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, news, Wikidata item.
Layout 2
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN
[As modified upto the 31st May, 2018]
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF PAKISTAN
# Constitution of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea/Schedule 3

Constitution of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea (Consolidated to Amendment No 22)
* Navigational template to PNG Constitution
* Constitution of Papua New Guinea: Index
* PREAMBLE.
* Part I. - INTRODUCTORY.
* Part II. - THE NATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEM.
* Part III. - BASIC PRINCIPLES OF GOVERNMENT.
* Part IV. - CITIZENSHIP.
* Part V. - THE HEAD OF STATE.
* Part VI. - THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT.
* Part VIA. - PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS AND LOCAL-LEVEL GOVERNMENTS.
* Part VII. - STATE SERVICES.
* Part VIII. - SUPERVISION AND CONTROL.
* Part IX. - CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICE-HOLDERS AND CONSTITUTIONAL INSTITUTIONS.
* Part X. - EMERGENCY POWERS.
* Part XI. - MISCELLANEOUS.
* Part XII. - CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW.
* Part XIII. - IMMEDIATE AND TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS.
* SCHEDULES
* Schedule 1. - RULES FOR SHORTENING AND INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS.
* Schedule 2. - ADOPTION, ETC., OF CERTAIN LAWS.
* Schedule 3. - DECLARATION OF OFFICE.
* Schedule 4. - JUDICIAL DECLARATION.
* Schedule 5. - ADOPTED LAWS OF OTHER COUNTRIES.
* APPENDICES
* Appendix. - CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS.
INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA.
Note: The overall document (Constitution of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea) has been separated into its individual parts, each part or schedule appearing on a separate article page.
Use the navigational index template to the right to navigate between the different sections.
Contents of this page
This page contains SCHEDULE 3 of the PNG Constitution.
Text appears after the Table of Contents for this part, below.
Note: that the headings and sub-headings identified in the Table of Contents below are for navigational purposes, and do not necessarily constitute the structural subdivision recognised in the document. In particular, any numbering appearing before a header or subheader in the Table of Contents does not correspond to the part, divisional, sectional or subsectional numbering scheme applied to the Constitution. The Constitution's part, divisional, sectional or subsectional numbering scheme is preserved in the body of the text of the document.

## SCHEDULE 3. DECLARATION OF OFFICE

SCHEDULE 3.
Sec.Sch.1.2(1).
DECLARATION OF OFFICE.
I…, do promise and declare that I will well and truly serve the Independent State of Papua New Guinea and its People in the office of…

## Notes to amendments

footnotes to amendments:

## References

* full PNG constitutional text; from Pacific Law Library.
# Constitution of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea/Schedule 4

Constitution of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea (Consolidated to Amendment No 22)
* Navigational template to PNG Constitution
* Constitution of Papua New Guinea: Index
* PREAMBLE.
* Part I. - INTRODUCTORY.
* Part II. - THE NATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEM.
* Part III. - BASIC PRINCIPLES OF GOVERNMENT.
* Part IV. - CITIZENSHIP.
* Part V. - THE HEAD OF STATE.
* Part VI. - THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT.
* Part VIA. - PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS AND LOCAL-LEVEL GOVERNMENTS.
* Part VII. - STATE SERVICES.
* Part VIII. - SUPERVISION AND CONTROL.
* Part IX. - CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICE-HOLDERS AND CONSTITUTIONAL INSTITUTIONS.
* Part X. - EMERGENCY POWERS.
* Part XI. - MISCELLANEOUS.
* Part XII. - CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW.
* Part XIII. - IMMEDIATE AND TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS.
* SCHEDULES
* Schedule 1. - RULES FOR SHORTENING AND INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS.
* Schedule 2. - ADOPTION, ETC., OF CERTAIN LAWS.
* Schedule 3. - DECLARATION OF OFFICE.
* Schedule 4. - JUDICIAL DECLARATION.
* Schedule 5. - ADOPTED LAWS OF OTHER COUNTRIES.
* APPENDICES
* Appendix. - CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS.
INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA.
Note: The overall document (Constitution of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea) has been separated into its individual parts, each part or schedule appearing on a separate article page.
Use the navigational index template to the right to navigate between the different sections.
Contents of this page
This page contains SCHEDULE 4 of the PNG Constitution.
Text appears after the Table of Contents for this part, below.
Note: that the headings and sub-headings identified in the Table of Contents below are for navigational purposes, and do not necessarily constitute the structural subdivision recognised in the document. In particular, any numbering appearing before a header or subheader in the Table of Contents does not correspond to the part, divisional, sectional or subsectional numbering scheme applied to the Constitution. The Constitution's part, divisional, sectional or subsectional numbering scheme is preserved in the body of the text of the document.

## SCHEDULE 4. JUDICIAL DECLARATION

SCHEDULE 4.
Sec.Sch.1.2(1).
JUDICIAL DECLARATION.
I…, do promise and declare that I will well and truly serve the Independent State of Papua New Guinea and its People in the office of…, that I will in all things uphold the Constitution and the laws of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea, and I will do right to all manner of people in accordance therewith, without fear or favour, affection or ill-will.

## Notes to amendments

footnotes to amendments:

## References

* full PNG constitutional text; from Pacific Law Library.
# Congressional Record/Volume 167/Issue 4/Senate/Counting of Electoral Ballots/Pennsylvania Objection Debate/Collins Speech

​Ms. Collins. Mr. President, let me begin my remarks tonight by expressing my heartfelt gratitude to the members of the law enforcement community and the National Guard whose hard work and courage made it possible for us to resume our deliberations tonight.
We return to this Chamber tonight undeterred by the violence we witnessed and strengthened in our determination to fulfill our constitutional duty. The Constitution is the foundation of our American democracy, and the Constitution is what must guide our decisions on the Presidential election.
The process the Constitution sets forth for electing Presidents through the electoral college is straightforward. The people vote. Electors are chosen. The electors vote. Then Congress counts the electors’ votes.
That final step in the process is why we have convened today. Counting the votes of the electors, a function that the 12th Amendment assigns to Congress, is an administrative and largely ceremonial act. Our job is simply to count the votes certified by each State—nothing more. We should not attempt to usurp the roles of the voters, the States, or the electoral college.
The American people have done their job, turning out in record numbers to vote in the midst of a frightening pandemic. Indeed, as a percentage of the voting-eligible population, the turnout was the highest in 120 years. Similarly, in the midst of this pandemic, hundreds of election officials and volunteers have done their job, staffing polling places and faithfully counting and often recounting votes. The States have done their job by certifying the election results.
Now, I have heard the proponents of these objections raise questions about whether the various States conducted their elections properly. When disputes over elections arise, candidates are able to appeal to our legal system, not Congress, for recourse.
In the 2 months since the 2020 election, the President’s lawyers and allies have had the opportunity to make their arguments and challenge election results before the courts. Notably, every one of nearly 60 lawsuits they have brought forward have been rejected. In fact, the Supreme Court has twice refused to hear their election challenges.
We must abide by these rulings. The time has now come for Congress to do its job. We should affirm the certified results of each State by counting the votes of their electors. Altering the results of the electoral college would set a terrible precedent in which the party in control of Congress could override the will of the voters and overrule our courts to unilaterally choose the next President. One Senator attempted such a maneuver after the election in 2004, and the Senate overwhelmingly rejected that effort. The Senate has demonstrated by its vote tonight that it will follow that precedent and do so again.
Today—tonight, Mr. President, I will continue to vote to reaffirm the foundation of our democracy, the Constitution of the United States. And I will reject these challenges to the electoral college.
Thank you, Mr. President.
# Court Royal

Page scans available at Index:Court Royal.djvu.
CONTENTS.
| chapter | | page |
| I. | A Little Devil | 1 |
| II. | Pawned | 9 |
| III. | Lazarus | 16 |
| IV. | Joanna's School | 21 |
| V. | Crudge, Solicitor | 28 |
| VI. | The Ducal Family | 36 |
| VII. | Beavis | 48 |
| VIII. | The Marquess | 59 |
| IX. | Lord Ronald | 64 |
| X. | The Fifth of November | 73 |
| XI. | Who was Rachel? | 84 |
| XII. | Charlie Cheek | 91 |
| XIII. | The Ems Water | 98 |
| XIV. | The Monokeratic Principle | 105 |
| XV. | Wanted, a Housemaid | 111 |
| XVI. | Venite | 115 |
| XVII. | Stock-taking | 121 |
| XVIII. | Lady Grace | 129 |
| XIX. | Sleepy Hollow | 138 |
| XX. | Dulcina | 144 |
| XXI. | Home-thrusts | 148 |
| XXII. | A Family Council | 153 |
| XXIII. | Reflorescence | 160 |
| XXIV. | Caught Napping | 168 |
| XXV. | Without Warning | 178 |
| XXVI. | Unstable as Water | 185 ​ |
| XXVII. | Revolt | 191 |
| XXVIII. | A Playbill | 199 |
| XXIX. | Two Stage Boxes | 205 |
| XXX. | Palma | 213 |
| XXXI. | A Spoke in the Wheel | 219 |
| XXXII. | A Drop of Comfort | 226 |
| XXXIII. | Broken off | 234 |
| XXXIV. | Incurables | 239 |
| XXXV. | A Card Castle | 247 |
| XXXVI. | The Council of Court Royal | 256 |
| XXXVII. | A Sister of Mercy | 262 |
| XXXVIII. | Reformation | 269 |
| XXXIX. | Over a Snail | 276 |
| XL. | Cheek Senior | 283 |
| XLI. | An Entanglement | 291 |
| XLII. | Nibbling | 297 |
| XLIII. | 'Shares?' | 302 |
| XLIV. | A Startling Proposal | 309 |
| XLV. | Retribution | 316 |
| XLVI. | E Tenebris Lux | 323 |
| XLVII. | Leigh | 331 |
| XLVIII. | The Fall of a Pillar | 337 |
| XLIX. | An April Fool | 345 |
| L. | To the Rescue | 352 |
| LI. | The Flying-fish | 359 |
| LII. | On the Pier | 368 |
| LIII. | Another Disappointment | 375 |
| LIV. | A New Leaf | 380 |
| LV. | In Vain | 384 |
| LVI. | Preparatory | 391 |
| LVII. | Release | 393 |
| LVIII. | The Last of the Ems Water | 400 |
| LIX. | Without a Watch-dog | 406 |
| LX. | Two Pictures | 414 |

## References

This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Court Rolls of the Manor of Ingoldmells in the County of Lincoln/Corrigendum

Layout 2
NOTE. Page 164.
For ‘prolutus’ read ‘for clay.’ The scribe seems to have written pro lutus but it would be an offence to dig down for the clay under the sand bank, and thus weaken them, so probably ‘pro luto’ is the right reading.
# Court Rolls of the Manor of Ingoldmells in the County of Lincoln/Dedication

Layout 2
TO
CHARLES FRANCIS MASSINGBERD-MUNDY
LORD OF THE MANOR
OF
INGOLDMELLS-CUM-ADDLETHORPE
# Death (Coates)

"I am the key that parts the gates of Fame"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1888), "Death" from The Century Magazine (August 1888).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1898), "Death" in Poems.
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "Death" in Poems II.

## References

* ↑ View this version at Google Books (scroll down on page to view)
# Death Comes for the Archbishop

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
DEATH COMES FOR THE ARCHBISHOP
[Advertisements]
* The Works of
* WILLA CATHER
* Alexander’s Bridge
* O Pioneers!
* The Song of the Lark
* My Antonia
* One of Ours
* A Lost Lady
* The Professor’s House
* My Mortal Enemy
* Youth and the Bright Medusa
* April Twilights
* BY WILLA CATHER
* Death comes for the Archbishop
* "Auspice Maria!"
* Father Vaillant's signet-ring
* NEW YORK
* ALFRED A KNOPF · MCMXXVII
COPYRIGHT 1926, 1927, BY WILLA CATHER
MANUFACTURED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CONTENTS
| Prologue. At Rome | 1 |
| 1. The Vicar Apostolic | 14 |
| 2. Missionary Journeys | 52 |
| 3. The Mass at Ácoma | 80 |
| 4. Snake Root | 118 |
| 5. Padre Martinez | 139 |
| 6. Doña Isabella | 175 |
| 7. The Great Diocese | 198 |
| 8. Gold under Pike’s Peak | 239 |
| 9. Death Comes for the Archbishop | 265 |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1947, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 76 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Deliverance from a Fit of Fainting

* related portals: Poetry.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Worthy art Thou, O Lord, of praise,
But ah! It's not in me.
My sinking heart I pray Thee raise
So shall I give it Thee.
My life as spider's webb's cut off,
Thus fainting have I said,
And living man no more shall see
But be in silence laid.
My feeble spirit Thou didst revive,
My doubting Thou didst chide,
And though as dead mad'st me alive,
I here a while might 'bide.
Why should I live but to Thy praise?
My life is hid with Thee.
O Lord, no longer be my days
Than I may fruitful be.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Delk v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
220 U.S. 580
Delk v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company
Argued: March 9, 1911. --- Decided: May 15, 1911
Messrs. Luther M. Walter, W. A. Percy, and T. F. Kelley for petitioner.
Messrs. Edward T. Miller and W. F. Evans for respondent.
Assistant Attorney General Fowler and Mr. Barton Corneau for the United States as amicus curioe.
Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Delight in Disorder

"Delight in Disorder" was first published in Robert Herrick's collection Hesperides in 1648.
* Delight in Disorder. Alfred Pollard, ed. 1898. The Hesperides & Noble Numbers.
* Delight in Disorder. Arthur Quiller-Couch, ed. 1919. The Oxford Book of English Verse: 1250–1900.
# Delight—becomes pictorial—

* "Delight becomes pictorial" in Poems: Second Series (1891)
* "Delight becomes pictorial" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# Delilah

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Delilah."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Delilah, a poem by Florence Earle Coates ("Evermore I hear my name")
* Delilah, a poem by Rudyard Kipling ("Delilah Aberyswith was a lady—not too young")
* Delilah, a poem by Ella Wheeler Wilcox ("In the midnight of darkness and terror")
* "Delilah," in Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897)
* "Delilah," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
# Delilah (Coates)

"Evermore I hear my name"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1901), "Delilah" in The Independent (28 February 1901).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1904), "Delilah" in Mine and Thine (1904).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "Delilah" in Poems II.

## References

* ↑ View this version at Google Books.
# Delilah (Kipling)

* Kipling, Rudyard (1899, 1919), "Delilah" in Departmental Ditties and Ballads and Barrack-Room Ballads.
* Kipling, Rudyard (1919), "Delilah" in Rudyard Kipling's Verse, Inclusive Edition, 1885-1918.
# Constitution of India (2020)/Part VII

​ PART VII.—[The States in Part B of the First Schedule]. Omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch. (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).
238. [Application of provisions of Part VI to States in Part B of the First Schedule.]–Omitted by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, s. 29 and Sch. (w.e.f. 1-11-1956).
# Cotton v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Cotton v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Cotton v. United States (50 U.S. 579)
* Cotton v. United States (52 U.S. 229)
See also United States v. Cotton.
# Cotton v. United States (50 U.S. 579)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
50 U.S. 579
Cotton v. United States
IN error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Florida.
Mr. Justice NELSON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cotton v. United States (50 U.S. 579)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
50 U.S. 579
Cotton v. United States
This is a motion of the part of the Attorney-General, to dismiss the writ of error for the want of jurisdiction.
The suit was brought by the United States against the defendant in the Superior Court of the District of West Florida, in the late Territory of Florida, for a trespass on government lands.
The declaration was filed in December term, 1844; and the plea of not guilty, in the vacation thereafter, on the 26th of March, 1845.
The cause remained pending in said court, or without any further proceedings therein, until the 15th of January, 1848, when the records and papers in the same were transferred to, and filed in, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, in pursuance of the act of the 22d of February, 1847 (Sess. Laws, ch. 17, § 8), and at the January term of the court, 1848, held at Tallahassee, it was ordered that the cause be docketed and stand for trial at the next March term of the said court, to be holden at Pensacola, notice of which order was given to the defendant. At the March term, the defendant appeared, and on leave filed a demurrer to the declaration, which, after argument, was overruled, and the cause set down for trial on the plea of not guilty.
The jury found a verdict for the plaintiffs, and assessed the damages at $362.50, for which sum judgment was rendered, besides costs.
Several exceptions were taken by the counsel for the defendant to the ruling of the court at the trial, which are found in the record, and on which he relies for a reversal of the judgment on this writ of error.
We have already held, in the case of Forsyth v. The United States, just decided, that a writ of error lies to the judgments in the peculiar class of cases described and provided for in the eighth section of the act of Congress passed 22d February, 1847, already referred to, without reference to the amount in controversy, and, as this case falls within that class, it follows that the court has jurisdiction to revise the judgment, and that the motion to dismiss must be denied.
The case not having been submitted by the counsel for a decision on the merits, as in the criminal cases just disposed of, it will remain on the docket for a hearing in its order.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Coudert v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
175 U.S. 178
Coudert v. United States
Argued: October 10, 1899. --- Decided: November 20, 1899
Messrs. Frederic R. Coudert, Jr., and Charles Frederic Adams for plaintiff in error.
Assistant Attorney General Pradt for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cotton and the Cotton-Supply

Serial article published in Once a Week.
* Part 1
* Part 2