OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Tales from the Arabic/Story of the Hawk and the Locust

Third-level story, contained in Story of the Sharper and the Merchants < King Shah Bekht and His Vizier Er Rehwan
STORY OF THE HAWK AND THE LOCUST.
‘There was once, of old time, a hawk who made himself a nest hard by that of a locust, and the latter gloried in his neighbourhood and betaking herself to him, saluted him and said, “O my lord and chief of the birds, indeed the nearness unto thee delighteth me and thou honourest me with thy neighbourhood and my soul is fortified with thee.” The hawk thanked her for this and there ensued friendship between them. One day, the locust said to the hawk, “O chief of the birds, how cometh it that I see thee alone, solitary, having with thee no friend of thy kind of the birds, to whom thou mayst incline in time of easance and of whom thou mayst seek succour in time of stress? Indeed, it is said, ‘Man goeth about seeking the ease of his body and the preservation of his strength, and in this there is nought more necessary to him than a friend who shall be the completion of his gladness and the mainstay of his life and on whom shall be his dependence in his stress and in his ease.’ Now I, albeit I ardently desire thy weal in that which beseemeth thy condition, yet am I weak [and unable] unto that which the soul craveth; but, if thou wilt give me leave, I will seek out for thee one of the birds who shall be conformable unto thee in thy body and thy strength.” And the hawk said, “I commit this to thee and rely upon thee therein.”
Therewithal, O my brother, the locust fell to going round about among the company of the birds, but saw ​nought resembling the hawk in bulk and body save the kite and deemed well of her. So she brought the hawk and the kite together and counselled the former to make friends with the latter. Now it chanced that the hawk fell sick and the kite abode with him a long while [and tended him] till he recovered and became whole and strong; wherefore he thanked her [and she departed from him]. But after awhile the hawk’s sickness returned to him and he needed the kite’s succour. So the locust went out from him and was absent from him a day, after which she returned to him with a[nother] locust, saying, “I have brought thee this one.” When the hawk saw her, he said, “God requite thee with good! Indeed, thou hast done well in the quest and hast been subtle in the choice.”
Return to Story of the Sharper and the Merchants.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Simplified Scientific Astrology

Simplified Scientific
Astrology
By Max Heindel
A COMPLETE TEXTBOOK ON THE ART OF ERECTING A HOROSCOPE
WITH
Philosophic Encyclopedia
and
TABLES OF PLANETARY HOURS
FIFTH EDITION
The Rosicrucian Fellowship
International Headquarters Mt. Ecclesia Oceanside, California
London Fowler & Co., 7 Imperial Arcade Ludgate Circus
COPYRIGHT 1919
BY
MRS. MAX HEINDEL
FELLOWSHIP PRESS OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA
Printed in the United States of America
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Pages
PART II
See Index on Following Page.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Simplified Scientific Astrology/Index

1919
TO PART I
# Simplified Grammar of the Hungarian Language/Interjections

INTERJECTIONS.
Interjections are words which signify a sudden emotion of the mind,—
For grief: O! oh! jaj! alas. For„ joy: juh! juhuhu! &c.
# Simplified Grammar of the Hungarian Language/Syntax

SYNTAX.
Syntax teaches us how to put words together so as to form sentences.
The meanings of the different forms of the noun and verb having been fully explained in the Accidence, there remains but little to say about this part of the subject. The following rules will, however, be found useful:—
The elements of the sentence are the agent, the predicate, and the object.
Nouns and verbs, having in each case a significant termination, are independent of their place in the sentence, and therefore the construction of Hungarian is very free. As a principal and leading rule it may be given, that the words follow the same order as the ideas occur.
In the sentence—János szereti Marít, John loves Mary—the words might be placed in any order without altering the meaning of the sentence.
The emphasis rests chiefly on the first word; and accordingly as we want to impress upon the hearer the person who loves, or the person (object) that is loved, or the fact that the person we speak of is in love, the respective word would be put in the first place. Thus the example given above would admit of six different arrangements: 123, 132, 213, 312, 321, 231, all of which would be equally grammatical and of the same meaning, although the emphasis would differ in each case.
​If the predicate is an adjective or a substantive, it is put after the subject without any copula; as—
A leány szép, the girl is pretty. Az épület szálloda, the building is an hotel.
But if these statements are not true at the time of speaking, but have been at some past, or presumably will be at some future period, the time is expressed by putting the appropriate tense of the verb van, "to be" after the predicate; e.g.—
A leány szép volt, the girl was pretty. As épület szálloda fog lenni, the building will be an hotel.
The verb van, when used as a copula between subject and predicate, stands always immediately after the latter. Thus, for instance, if the order of subject and predicate were reversed the above sentence would be: szép volt a leány.
There may be also parenthetical clauses in English for which no other rules need be given than those to be found in English grammars.
# South Carolina State Board of Education v. Brown/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 222
South Carolina State Board of Education v. Brown
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# South Carolina v. Bailey

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
289 U.S. 412
South Carolina v. Bailey
Argued: April 21, 1933. --- Decided: May 22, 1933
Messrs. Wm. C. Wolfe, of Orangeburg, S.C., and John M. Daniel, of Columbia, S.C., for the State of South Carolina. at* Mr. Clyde R. Hoey, of Shelby, N.C., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from page 413 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# South Carolina Legislative Manual (1917)

DIAGRAM OF SENATE CHAMBER Dimensions: 44 feet deep, 74 feet wide, 43 feet high
ALLOTMENT OF DESKS IN THE SENATE
Senate desks are not numbered. Numbers used here are for convenience.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1934, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 89 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
303 U.S. 177
South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.
Argued: Jan. 4, 1938. --- Decided: Feb 14, 1938
As Amended on Denial of Rehearing March 14, 1938.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of South Carolina.
[Syllabus from pages 177-179 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Steve C. Griffith, of Newberry, S.C., Thomas W. Davis, of Wilmington, N.C., and Eugene S. Blease, of Newberry, S.C., for appellants.
Messrs. S. King Funkhouser, and Frank Coleman, both of Roanoke, Va., for appellees.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# South Carolina ex rel Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company v. McMaster

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
237 U.S. 63
South Carolina ex rel Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company v. McMaster
Argued: March 12, 1915. --- Decided: April 5, 1915
Mr. T. Moultrie Mordecai for plaintiffs in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 64 intentionally omitted]
Mr. F. H. Dominick and Mr. Thomas H. Peeples, Attorney General of South Carolina, for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 65-66 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Southern Historical Society Papers/Volume 01/May

Volume 1, Issue 5
* Reminiscences of the Confederate Navy
* Captain Ritter's Account of the Death of Sergt. Langley
* General Wilcox on Seven Pines
* Review of Bates' Gettysburg
* Diary of Captain R. E. Park, of the 12th Ala. Regiment
* Correction of Incident in Reference to General Pickett
* Address of General D. H. Hill before the Mecklenburg, North Carolina, Historical Society
* Editorial Paragraphs
* Book Notices
# Socialism, Fascism, Capitalism, and Communism Chart

Socialism, Fascism, Capitalism, and Communism Chart Presented by the Hampton Roads Naval Museum
| | Socialism | Fascism | Capitalism | Communism |
| OWNERSHIP | Individuals may own property and small businesses. State ownership of essential services (electricity, water, internet) | Individuals may own property and small businesses. State ownership of essential services through dictator | Individuals have right to own property. Little to no government ownership of services or production | Entire elimination of property rights – no individual land ownership. No economic incentives to individually own |
| EQUALITY | Redistribution of income to create equal classes. Total freedom of religion | Nationalistic religion. Unequal redistribution of wealth to reinforce a rigid class structure | Freedom of movement and a free economy gives people equal opportunity to pursue life | All are equal under the eyes of the government except the ruling class, which is in charge of the redistribution of wealth |
| PRICES | Redistribution of wealth through government oversight. Price control on staple goods while much of economy runs unfettered | Prices set around class structure and are influenced by supply and demand. | Prices are set by consumer/corporation through supply and demand. Competition brings with it lower prices and better products. | Prices defined by government who respond and control supply and demand to artificially control pricing. |
| TAXES | High taxes focused on social services or welfare state | High taxes focused on raising military funds for national defense | Limited taxes to match limited government | High, strict tax rates focused on redistributing wealth to central power |
| HEALTHCARE | Free and accessible to all. Operated by the federal government | Accessible and free to all that meet requirements (race, nationality, citizenship are usually factors) | Determined by market – little to no government regulation. | Accessible to all but distributed unequally (less accessible to poor). Operated by the federal government |
| NOTABLE FIGURES | César Chavez, Albert Einstein, Friedrich Engels | Benito Mussolini, Adolf Hitler, Nikola Mandic | Adam Smith, Ronald Reagan, George Washington | Karl Marx, Fidel Castro, Joseph Stalin, Vladimir Lenin |
| GENERAL PHILOSOPHY | Internationalistic with idealized future based on redistribution of wealth to fund and support social programs | Nationalistic agenda usually centered around one powerful individual with an idealized past that encourages individualism | The free market will determine prices and competition will drive improvements | Capitalism has failed to help the working class because it only incentivizes individualism and therefore must be torn through force |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Social Security Act 2018 (Version 59)/Section 7

* The Minister may give MSD general or special written directions about MSD’s performing or exercising any duties, functions, or powers of MSD under enactments in, or made under, either or both of this Act and the New Zealand Superannuation and Retirement Income Act 2001.
* Directions given under this section cannot do what is done by the following kinds of directions: preferred suppliers: transitional or savings provisions directions given under section 372:debt recovery directions given under regulations made under section 444 (see section 444(1), (2)(c), and (3)).
* MSD must, in performing or exercising a duty, function, or power, comply with all relevant current directions given under this section.
* A direction given under this section— must, as soon as practicable after it is given, be— published on an Internet site administered by or on behalf of MSD; andnotified in the Gazette; andmust, each time it is amended without also being replaced, as soon as practicable after it is amended, be published— on an Internet site administered by or on behalf of MSD; andas at a stated date; andincorporating amendments up to that date; anis not a legislative instrument, but is a disallowable instrument, for the purposes of the Legislation Act 2012, and must be presented to the House of Representatives not only— as soon as practicable; but alsounder section 41 of that Act.
* A notification in the Gazette for the purpose of subsection (4)(a)(ii) does not have to include the text of the direction.
# Social Security Act 2018 (Version 59)/Section 8

Corrections have been made to subsection (1) on 10 December 2018 under section 25(1)(j)(i), (ii), (iii), and (v) of the Legislation Act 2012.
* This section applies to a decision by MSD so far as the decision does all or any of the following: determines (that is, grants, or refuses to grant, on any basis) an application for a benefit:reviews (and suspends, cancels, or varies, from a date determined by MSD) a benefit already granted:determines the rate of benefit (from a date, or dates, determined by MSD):grants, or refuses to grant, on any basis, a payment of a funeral grant (see section 90):grants or refuses to grant, on any basis, a payment under an approved special assistance programme.
* MSD may make a determination to regard as single, for the purposes of the decision, an applicant or a beneficiary who is married or in a civil union with the applicant’s or beneficiary’s spouse or partner, but— is living apart from the applicant’s or beneficiary’s spouse or partner; andis not in a de facto relationship.
* A determination under subsection (2) may include a date, determined by MSD, on which the spouses or partners must be taken for the purposes of the decision to have commenced to live apart.
* MSD may make a determination to regard as a party to a de facto relationship, for the purposes of the decision, any 2 people who, not being legally married or in a civil union, have entered into a de facto relationship.
* A determination under subsection (4), for the purposes of the decision, may include either or both of the following dates: a date, determined by MSD, on which the 2 people must be taken as having entered into the de facto relationship:a date, determined by MSD, on which the de facto relationship of the 2 people must be taken to have ended.
* Every determination under this section also applies for the purposes of every debt-recovery or offence provision in or under this Act.
# Social Workers Registration Ordinance (Amendment of Schedule 2) Notice 2022

Also see Social Workers Registration (Amendment) Ordinance 2024 (18 of 2024) for more national security provisions.
Layout 2
​L.N. 109 of 2022
Social Workers Registration Ordinance (Amendment of Schedule 2) Notice 2022
(Made by the Secretary for Labour and Welfare under section 39(2) of the Social Workers Registration Ordinance (Cap. 505))
1. Commencement
This Notice comes into operation on 22 July 2022.
2. Social Workers Registration Ordinance amended
The Social Workers Registration Ordinance (Cap. 505) is amended as set out in section
3. Schedule 2 amended (description of offences which disentitle persons from being or continuing to be registered social workers)
Schedule 2—
    Add
    “5. An offence endangering national security”.
Dr. C. K. LAW Secretary for Labour and Welfare
16 May 2022
Explanatory Note
Under section 17(4)(b) of the Social Workers Registration Ordinance (Cap. 505) (Ordinance), the Social Workers Registration Board established under section 4(1) of the Ordinance is to, unless certain exception applies, refuse to register as a registered social worker a person who has been convicted in Hong Kong of any offence coming within any of the descriptions specified in Schedule 2 to the Ordinance (Schedule 2 offence); or who has been convicted elsewhere of any offence where the act or omission constituting the offence, if the act or omission had occurred in Hong Kong, would constitute a Schedule 2 offence.
2. This Notice amends Schedule 2 to the Ordinance by adding an offence under the description of an offence endangering national security.
This work is a Hong Kong ordinance, which is copyrighted in Hong Kong for 50 years after publication pursuant to section 183(2) and paragraph 36 of Schedule 2 of the Copyright Ordinance (Cap. 528). However, as an edict of a government, it is in the public domain in the U.S.
According to Section 3 of the Interpretation and General Clauses Ordinance (Cap. 1), the term "ordinance" also includes any subsidiary legislation made under any ordinances of Hong Kong that does not contravene with the Hong Kong Basic Law.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Social Security Board v. Nierotko

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
327 U.S. 358
Social Security Board v. Nierotko
Argued: Dec. 12, 1945. --- Decided: Feb 25, 1946
Mr.Paul A. Sweeney, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Ernest Goodman, of Detroit, Mich., for responde t.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Territory of Alaska v. Troy

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
258 U.S. 101
Territory of Alaska v. Troy
Argued: Dec. 15 and 16, 1921. --- Decided: Feb 27, 1922
Mr. John Rustgard, of Juneau, Alaska, for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 102-104 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Solicitor General Beck, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 104-108 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Spouter's companion/How-d'ye-do and Good-bye

HOW-D'YE-DO AND GOOD-BYE
One day Good-bye met How-d'ye-do, Too close to shun saluting;
But soon the rival sisters flew From kissing to disputing.
"Away!" says How-d'ye-do," your mien Appals my cheerful nature;
No name so sad as yours is seen In sorrow's nomenclature.
Where'er I give one, sunshine hour, Your cloud comes in to shade it; Where'er I plant one bosom's flower, Your mildew drops to fade it.
Ere How-d'ye-do has tuned each tongue To 'hope's delightful measure,' Good-bye in friendship's ear has rung The knell of parting pleasure!
From sorrows past, my chemic skill Draws smiles of consolation; While you, from present joys, distil The tears of separation."
Good-bye replied, “Your statement's true, And well your cause you've pleaded;
But, pray, who'd think of How-d'ye-do, Unless Good-bye preceded!
Without my prior influence, Could yours have ever flourish'd; And can your land one flower dispense,
​How oft,—if at the court of love Concealment is the fashion,— When How-d'ye-do has fail'd to move, Good-bye reveals the passion?
How oft, when Cupid's fires decline, As every heart remembers, One sigh of mine, and only mine, Revives the dying embers?
Go, bid the timid lover choose, And I'll resign my charter, If he for ten kind How-d'ye-do's, One kind Good-bye would barter!
From love and friendship's kindred source We both derive existence; And they would both lose half their force Without our joint assistance.
'Tis well the world our merit knows, Since time, there's no denying, One half in How-d'ye doing goes, And t'other in Good-bying."
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Spouter's companion/Gertrude Von Der Wart

GERTRUDE VON DER WART.
Her hands were clasp'd, her dark eyes raised, The breeze threw back her hair;
Up to the fearful Wheel she gazed, All that she loved was there! The night was round her clear and cold, The holy heaven above,
Its pale stars watching to behold
​And bid me not depart, the cried, My Rudolph, say not so; This is no time to quit thy side; Peace—peace—I cannot go. Hath tho world aught for me to fear, When death is on thy brow? The world—what means it?—mine is here; I will not leave thee now!
I have been with thee in thine hour Of glory and of bliss; Doubt not its memory's living power, To strengthen me through this. And thou, mine honour'd lord and true, Bear on, bear nobly on; We have the blessed heaven in view, Whose rest shall soon he won."
And were not these high words to flow From woman's breaking heart? Through all that night of bitterest woe She bore her lofty part. But oh! with such a glazing eye, With such a curdling cheek, Love, love, of mortal agony, Thou only, thou shouldst speak!
Tho wind rose high, but with it rose Her voice that he might hear;
Perchance that dark hour brought repose To happy bosoms near. While she sat pining with despair, Beside his tortured form. And pouring her deep soul in prayer,
​She wiped the death-damps from his brow, With her pale hand and soft, Whose touch upon the late chords low, Had still'd his heart so oft. She spread her mantle o'er his breast; She bath'd his lips with dew; And on his cheek such kisses press'd, As hope and joy ne'er knew.
Oh! lovely are ye, Love and Faith, Enduring to the last! She had her meed, one smile in death, And his worn spirit pass'd, While, even as o'er a martyr's grave, She knelt on that sad spot; And, weeping, bless'd the God who gave Her strength to forsake it not!
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Spouter's companion/Parody on Lord Ullin's Daughter

PARODY ON LORD ULLIN'S DAUGHTER.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse