OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# How Long Until the Y2K Computer Problem?

How Long Until the Y2K Computer Problem? Congressional Record: October 15, 1998 (Extensions of Remarks) Page E2185. DOCID:cr15oc98-17.
HOW LONG UNTIL THE Y2K COMPUTER PROBLEM?
______
HON. JOHN LINDER
OF GEORGIA
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Thursday, October 15, 1998
Mr. LINDER. Mr. Speaker, there is approximately 1 Year, 2 Months, 16 Days, 10 Hours, 56 Minutes, and 43 Seconds until the Year 2000 computer problem affects computers and computer chips worldwide on the morning of January 1, 2000.
As we know, many computers will be unable to process dates beyond December 31, 1999, making the year 2000 indistinguishable from the year 1900. The potential technological turmoil could cause computers to generate incorrect data or stop running. Credit cards, ATM cards, security systems, hospital equipment, telephone service, electricity, and paycheck systems could be affected. I don't think anyone is sure what will happen.
Fortunately, in the year 2000, we have a few days to recover after the Y2K problem hits because January 1 falls on Saturday. However, we lose one potential additional day because the New Year's Day holiday-- by law--must be observed on the previous Friday, December 31, 1999.
I have introduced legislation that will provide the public and technology professionals with an additional day, prior to the start of the first workweek in January 2000, to work on repairs on failed computer systems caused by the Year 2000 computer problem. H.J. Res. 130 will move the New Year's Day holiday in the year 2000 to Monday, January 3, 2000.
Mr. Speaker, congressional committees have been successfully working to prepare the nation for Y2K, and this is just another proposal that may help ease the difficulties we face. It is not a silver bullet to solve the problem. It is vital that all businesses and government agencies continue to mobilize and work to repair computers in the remaining 442 days before the Y2K problem strikes. H.J. Res. 130 simply ensures that businesses, the public and computer experts have an additional 24 hours to respond to problems that may arise.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# How M'Ginnis Went Missing

Let us cease our idle chatter, Let the tears bedew our cheek, For a man from Tallangatta Has been missing for a week.
Where the roaring flooded Murray Covered all the lower land, There he started in a hurry With a bottle in his hand.
And his fate is bid for ever, But the public seem to think That he slumbered by the river, 'Neath the influence of drink.
And they scarcely seem to wonder That the river, wide and deep, Never woke him with its thunder, Never stirred him in his sleep.
And the crashing logs came sweeping And their tumult filled the air, Then M'Ginnis murmured, sleeping, "'Tis a wake in ould Kildare."
So the river rose and found him Sleeping softly by the stream. And the cruel waters drowned him Ere he wakened from his dream.
And the blossom-tufted wattle, Blooming brightly on the lea, Saw M'Ginnis and the bottle Going drifting out to sea.
This work is in the public domain in Australia because it was created in Australia and the term of copyright has expired. According to Australian Copyright Council - Duration of Copyright, the following works are public domain:
* published non-government works whose author died before January 1, 1955,
* anonymous or pseudonymous works and photographs published before January 1, 1955, and
* government works published more than 50 years ago (before January 1, 1974).
This work is also in the public domain in the United States because it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days), and it was first published before 1989 without complying with U.S. copyright formalities (renewal and/or copyright notice) and it was in the public domain in Australia on the URAA date (January 1, 1996). This is the combined effect of Australia having joined the Berne Convention in 1928, and of 17 USC 104A with its critical date of January 1, 1996.
Because the Australian copyright term in 1996 was 50 years, the critical date for copyright in the United States under the URAA is January 1, 1946.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# How Many Cards?

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
   Million-a-Month Creveling was found dead under very peculiar circumstances. If it was suicide, why? If it was murder, who?
HOW MANY CARDS?
A MURDER MYSTERY
by
ISABEL OSTRANDER
HOW MANY CARDS?
By Isabel Ostrander
Million-a-Month Creveling was found dead under very peculiar circumstances. If it was suicide, why? If it was murder, who? Ex-Roundsman McCarty found the answer and Isabel Ostrander makes a thrilling story
$2.00
HOW MANY CARDS?
BY ISABEL OSTRANDER
Author of "The Island of Intrigue," "Suspense,"
"Ashes to Ashes," Etc.
NEW YORK
ROBERT M. McBRIDE & CO,
1920
Copyright, 1920, by
Robert M. McBride & Co.
Printed in the
United States of America
Published, 1920

### CONTENTS

* chapterpage
* I. Ex-Roundsman McCarty Mixes in 1
* II. The Voice on the Wire 12
* III. Inquiries 25
* IV. The Torn Card 36
* V. "Who Killed Him?" 50
* VI. The Cigarette Case 64
* VII. The Shadow on the Stairs 78
* VIII. From the Long Ago 92
* IX. "Done For!" 106
* X. Ilsa 121
* XI. Birds of Different Feather 136
* XII. Bolted Doors 150
* XIII. The Curse of Scotland 166
* XIV. The Lure of Chance 183
* XV. Wade Terhune Experiments 199
* XVI. Into Their Hands 216
* XVII. The Letter 230
* XVIII. The Name in the Book 241
* XIX. Green Fire 254
* XX. Mice and Men—and Trixie Burns 266
* XXI. McCarty Opens the Pot 279
* XXII. The Turn of a Card 293
* XXIII. The Last Hand 310
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1924, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 99 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hellmich v. Hellman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
276 U.S. 233
Hellmich v. Hellman
Argued: Jan. 4, 5, 1928. --- Decided: Feb 20, 1928
The Attorney General and Mrs. Mabel Walker Willebrandt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Mr. Henry H. Furth, of St. Louis, Mo., for respondent.
Mr. Justice SANFORD delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Heller v. Connecticut

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Fortas
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 902
Heller v. Connecticut
See 389 U.S. 997, 88 S.Ct. 458.
David M. Reilly, for petitioner.
William I. Mark, for respondent.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Connecticut.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Heller v. Connecticut/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Fortas
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 902
Heller v. Connecticut
Denied.
Mr. Justice FORTAS, with whom Mr. Justice DOUGLAS joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hellmich v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
273 U.S. 242
Hellmich v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
Argued: Jan. 18, 1927. --- Decided: Feb 21, 1927
The Attorney General and Mrs. Mabel Walker Willebrandt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from page 243 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Edward J. White, of St. Louis, Mo., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from page 244 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hello! Hello! Who's Your Lady Friend?

This Song may be Sung in Public without fee nr Licence Except at Theatres & Music Halls.
The British troops go into battle singing either
“It’s a Long, Long Way to Tipperary” or “Hello! Hello! Who’s Your Lady Friend?”
Hello! Hello! Who’s Your Lady Friend?
Sung By The Soldiers of the King.
Copyright
London. B. Feldman & Cᴼ 2 & 3, Arthur Street, New Oxford Street, W.C. Copyright MCMXIII in America by B. Feldman & Cᴼ
* Score
* Lyrics
* Advertisements
Copyright, 1913, by B. Feldman & Co.
For the United States of America and Canada by B. Feldman & Co. For all other Countries B. Feldman & Co., London, England.
All Rights Reserved. All Mechanical and Performing Rights Strictly Reserved.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published in 1913, before the cutoff of January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Heroines of Freethought

CONTENTS.
# Howard at Atlanta

RIGHT in the track where Sherman Ploughed his red furrow, Out of the narrow cabin, Up from the cellar's burrow, Gathered the little black people, With freedom newly dowered, Where, beside their Northern teacher, Stood the soldier, Howard.
He listened and heard the children Of the poor and long-enslaved Reading the words of Jesus, Singing the songs of David. Behold!--the dumb lips speaking, The blind eyes seeing! Bones of the Prophet's vision Warmed into being!
Transformed he saw them passing Their new life's portal Almost it seemed the mortal Put on the immortal. No more with the beasts of burden, No more with stone and clod, But crowned with glory and honor In the image of God!
There was the human chattel Its manhood taking; There, in each dark, bronze statue, A soul was waking! The man of many battles, With tears his eyelids pressing, Stretched over those dusky foreheads His one-armed blessing.
And he said: "Who hears can never Fear for or doubt you; What shall I tell the children Up North about you?" Then ran round a whisper, a murmur, Some answer devising: And a little boy stood up: "General, Tell 'em we're rising!"
O black boy of Atlanta! But half was spoken The slave's chain and the master's Alike are broken. The one curse of the races Held both in tether They are rising,--all are rising, The black and white together!
O brave men and fair women! Ill comes of hate and scorning Shall the dark faces only Be turned to mourning?-- Make Time your sole avenger, All-healing, all-redressing; Meet Fate half-way, and make it A joy and blessing!
# Howard v. Bugbee/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
65 U.S. 461
Howard v. Bugbee
This is a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the State of Alabama.
Enoch Parsons executed a mortgage of the premises in controversy, on the 9th December, 1836, to Sarah Tait, to secure the payment of $13,246.66. The last instalment fell due in January, 1841. In March, 1846, proceedings were instituted in the court of chancery to foreclose the mortgage for default in payment; and in September, 1848, Howard, the appellant, became the purchaser of the premises, under the decree of foreclosure, and held a deed of the same duly executed by the proper officer.
In January, 1842, the Legislature of the State of Alabama passed an act authorizing a judgment creditor of the mortgator, or of his estate, at any time within two years after the sale under a mortgage, to redeem the land from the purchase on paying the purchase money, with a certain per cent. interest, besides charges.
Bugbee, the appellee, and plaintiff in the court below, having recovered a judgment against the estate of Parsons in 1843, tendered within the two years the purchase money, interest, and charges, to Howard, and also a deed of the premises to be executed; and of which were refused. This bill was filed in the court of chancery in Alabama by Bugbee to compel Howard to receive the money in redemption of the sale and execute the deed.
The main ground of the defence in that suit was, that the mortgage from Parsons, under which the defendant derived title, having been executed before the passage of the act providing for the redemption, the act as respected this debt was inoperative and void, as impairing the obligation of the contract.
The court of chancery so held and dismissed the bill. But on appeal to the Supreme Court, that court reversed the decree below, and entered a decree for the complainant. The case is now here on a writ of error to the Supreme Court.
The only question involved in this case was decided in Bronson v. Kinzie, 1 How., 311. It was there held, after a very careful and extended examination by the court, through the Chief Justice, that the State law impaired the obligation of the mortgage contract, and was forbidden by the Constitution. This decision has since been repeatedly affirmed. 2 How., 612; 3 Ib., 716.
It is due to the judges of the court below to say that they felt bound by a decision of their predecessors, which they admitted to be direct conflict with the case of Bronson v. Kinzie, and that the two decisions could not be reconciled.
We are entirely satisfied with the soundness of the decision in the above case, and with the grounds and reasons upon which it is placed, and shall simply refer to them as governing the present case.
Decree below reversed. Case remitted with directions to enter decree for the plaintiff in error.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Herrin Transportation Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
366 U.S. 419
Herrin Transportation Company v. United States
Carl L. Phinney, for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and James Y. Piper, for the United States.
Edwell H. Muse, Jr., for appellee Stickland Transportation Co.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Herrin Transportation Company v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
366 U.S. 419
Herrin Transportation Company v. United States
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Herrick v. Boquillas Land Cattle Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
200 U.S. 96
Herrick v. Boquillas Land Cattle Company
Argued: December 7, 1905. --- Decided: January 2, 1906
Mr. Ben Goodrich for appellants.
Mr. Francis J. Henley for appellee.
Mr. Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Herrera v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
222 U.S. 558
Herrera v. United States
Argued: December 11 and 12, 1911. --- Decided: January 15, 1912
Messrs. Howard Thayer Kingsbury, Crammond Kennedy, and Frank D. Pavey for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 559-562 intentionally omitted]
Assistant Attorney General Thompson and Mr. Franklin W. Collins for appellee.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hurrah for the Bonnets of Blue (Glasgow, 1829)/I'd be a Butterfly

I’D BE A BUTTERFLY.
# Hurrah for the Bonnets of Blue (Glasgow, 1829)/Oh Say Not Woman's Love is Bought

Although not credited, the words are from an operatic piece called 'The Heir of Vironi' written by Isaac Pocock and set to music by John Whitaker
OH SAY NOT WOMAN’S LOVE IS BOUGHT.
# Hurrah for the Bonnets of Blue (Glasgow, 1829)/The Cypress Wreath

Although not credited, these words are by Walter Scott from his poem "Rokeby" Canto V, Stanza XII.
THE CYPRESS WREATH. A Glee for 3 voices.
# Hurricane Milton max intensity

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Hurricane Center’s 00z Hurricane Advisory issued on 07 Oct 2024. This included the max intensity of Hurricane Milton
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hurrah for the Bonnets of Blue (Glasgow, 1829)/Pray Goody

This verse appears in Act I. of Midas: an English Burletta, by Kane O'Hara
PRAY GOODY
# Hurrah for the Bonnets of Blue (Glasgow, 1829)/The Captive Maniac

Although not credited, this song is by Walter Scott and appears in The Lady of the Lake, Canto 4, Stanza XXII
THE CAPTIVE MANIAC.
# Hurricane Katrina state of emergency declaration

* related portals: New Orleans.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary August 27, 2005

## Statement on Federal Emergency Assistance for Louisiana

The President today declared an emergency exists in the State of Louisiana and ordered Federal aid to supplement state and local response efforts in d in the path of Hurricane Katrina beginning on August 26, 2005, and continuing.
The President's action authorizes the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), to coordinate all disaster relief efforts which have the purpose of alleviating the hardship and suffering caused by the emergency on the local population, and to provide appropriate assistance for required emergency measures, authorized under Title V of the Stafford Act, to save lives, protect property and public health and safety, or to lessen or avert the threat of a catastrophe in the parishes of Allen, Avoyelles, Beauregard, Bienville, Bossier, Caddo, Caldwell, Claiborne, Catahoula, Concordia, De Soto, East Baton Rouge, East Carroll, East Feliciana, Evangeline, Franklin, Grant, Jackson, LaSalle, Lincoln, Livingston, Madison, Morehouse, Natchitoches, Pointe Coupee, Ouachita, Rapides, Red River, Richland, Sabine, St. Helena, St. Landry, Tensas, Union, Vernon, Webster, West Carroll, West Feliciana, and Winn.
Specifically, FEMA is authorized to identify, mobilize, and provide at its discretion, equipment and resources necessary to alleviate the impacts of the emergency. Debris removal and emergency protective measures, including direct Federal assistance, will be provided at 75 percent Federal funding.
Representing FEMA, Michael D. Brown, Under Secretary for Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security, named William Lokey as the Federal Coordinating Officer for Federal recovery operations in the affected area.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FEMA (202) 646-4600.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hurricane Sandy relief bill (H.R. 41; 113th Congress)

* related portals: United States Congress.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
H.R. 41 as introduced
113th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 41
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 3, 2013
Mr. Garrett (for himself, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Frelinghuysen, Mr. Lance, Mr. Grimm, Mr. Hanna, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Meeks, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Andrews, Mr. Runyan, Mr. LoBiondo, Ms. Meng, Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Tonko, and Mr. Bishop of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To temporarily increase the borrowing authority of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the National Flood Insurance Program.

# Section 1. Temporary increase in borrowing authority for National Flood Insurance Program

    (a) Section 1309(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking “$20,725,000,000” and inserting “$30,425,000,000”.
    (b) The amount provided by this section is designated by the Congress as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 403(a) of S. Con. Res. 13 (111th Congress), the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2010, and as an emergency pursuant to section 4(g) of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010(2 U.S.C. 933(g)).
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Maxwell v. Dow

United States Supreme Court
176 U.S. 581
Maxwell v. Dow
Argued: December 4, 1899. --- Decided: February 26, 1900
Mr. J. W. N. Whitecotton for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Alexander C. Bishop and William A. Lee for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Peckham delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Maxwell v. Good Samaritan Hospital Association, Inc./Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
392 U.S. 656
Maxwell v. Good Samaritan Hospital Association, Inc.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.
Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, and Mr. Justice FORTAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Clark, James William

​Clark, James William, M.A., Trin. Hall, Camb., 1877, B.A. (fellow) 1874, lecturer of Trin. Hall 1874–6, joint author of Interpretation of Deeds, a student of Lincoln's Inn 5 June, 1874 (then aged 23), called to the bar 7 May, 1879 (eldest son of James Clark, Esq., late of Brighton, secretary to Colonial Bank London); born 30 May, 1851.
    11, Old Square, W.C.; Reform Club.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Clarence, Lovell Burchett

​Clarence, (Hon.) Lovell Burchett, B.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1861, puisne judge of Ceylon since 1876, deputy Queen's advocate there 1873–6, a student of the Inner Temple 20 Jan., 1862 (then aged 23), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1864 (only son of George O. Clarence, Esq., of Charmouth, Devon); born , 1839; married 29 Aug., 1867, Blanche, dau. of late John Gunter, of Fulham, Middlesex.
    Colombo.