OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Mogall v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
333 U.S. 424
Mogall v. United States
Argued: Oct. 16, 1947. --- Decided: March 8, 1948
Petitioner and his employee, one Perniciaro, were jointly indicted and tried on the charges contained in an eight-count indictment. The defendants were acquitted under Counts 1 to 7, the first of which charged petitioner and Perniciaro with conspiring for the purpose of enabling Perniciaro to evade military service by failing to make known to the draft board facts which might have resulted in Perniciaro being placed in a different draft classification. The defendants were convicted under Count 8, however, which charged petitioner and Perniciaro with failing to report facts in writing to the local draft board which might have resulted in Perniciaro being placed in a different draft classification, contrary to § 11 of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 54 Stat. 894, 50 U.S.C.Appendix, § 311, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 311, and § 626.1(b) of the Selective Service Regulations.
The Government now concedes that the Selective Service Regulations imposed no legal obligation upon petitioner, as an employer of a registrant under the Selective Training and Service Act, to make such reports to the local board. It is also conceded that petitioner was tried and convicted upon the assumption that he was under such a legal obligation. We agree that the plain language of the Regulation and the record of this case support these conclusions.
The Government urges that although the judgment of conviction against petitioner should be reversed, the indictment should not be dismissed since the prosecution may wish to try petitioner a second time on the charges contained in Count 8, as an aider and abettor.
There is no showing of facts sufficient for us to pass judgment on the question. Accordingly, we intimate no opinion on the propriety of this procedure or the issues which it might present. See Sealfon v. United States, 1948, 332 U.S. 575, 68 S.Ct. 237. Those questions will be open in the District Court on our remand of the cause.
Reversed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mogall v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
333 U.S. 424
Mogall v. United States
Argued: Oct. 16, 1947. --- Decided: March 8, 1948
Mr. Rudolph F. Becker, Jr., of New Orleans, La., for petitioner.
Mr. W. Marvin Smith, of New Orleans, La., for the United States.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Modern Russian Poetry/Z. Shishova

Z. Shishova
This is one of the more gifted of the woman poets in the youngest choir.
# Modern Russian Poetry/Zinaida Hippius

Zinaida Hippius
(Mme. Dmitry Merezhkovsky; born 1869)
Poetry is not woman's work in Russia. Zinaida Hippius, the wife of Dmitry Merezhkovsky, is one of the few who carry it on. She has written a great deal of bad fiction, some partisan criticism, rather indifferent dramas, and her poetry is not unexceptionable. Soon after her literary marriage she joined the Petersburg symbolists, and with her husband was one of the founders of the Religious Philosophical Society. A weakness for religious discussion and a theosophic bias have done much damage to both her prose and her verse. Her later poetry, however, is interesting as the expression of her difficult and distinctive personality. She has the quality of burning ice, hiding under contemptuous ennui her passion for the impossible. In any event, she is a virtuoso of verse, whose mastery of tone-color and metric pattern is wholly admirable.
She is at present engaged, together with her husband, in writing hymns of hate against the Bolsheviki, from the bitter security of the Diaspora.
# Modern Russian Poetry/Yevgeny Baratynsky

Yevgeny Baratynsky
(1800-1844)
"It is a little cup, but it is nay own," thus might Baratynsky sum up the small perfection of his art. He belonged to Pushkin's school, but was not eclipsed by the master. His oeuvre consists of one slender volume of lyrics. These are marked by the originality of the discriminating eclectic, by a strong conscience for form, and by the obtruding intellection of a born pessimist.
Like most of the Russian littérateurs of the first half of the nineteenth century, with which he was born, Baratynsky belonged to the kept classes. An infringement of the eighth commandment while he was at school (the Corps of Pages) reduced this son of a senator to a mere private. The experience may have accented his gloomy temperament. Aside from this, the outward circumstances of his life, including his marriage, were happy, and therefore have no history. His last years, however, were saddened by the consciousness of estrangement from the rising generation.
# Modern Russian Poetry/end matter

THE EUROPEAN LIBRARY
Edited by J. E. SPINGARN
This series is intended to keep Americans in touch with the intellectual and spiritual ferment of the continent of Europe to-day, by means of translations that partake in some measure of the vigor and charm of the originals. No attempt will be made to give what Americans miscall "the best books," if by this is meant conformity to some high and illusory standard of past greatness; any twentieth-century book which displays creative power or a new outlook or more than ordinary interest will be eligible for inclusion. Nor will the attempt be made to select books that merely confirm American standards of taste or morals, since the series is intended to serve as a mirror of European culture and not as a glass through which it may be seen darkly. All forms of literature will be represented, including fiction, belles lettres, poetry, philosophy, social and economic discussion, history, biography, etc.; and special attention will be paid to authors whose works have not hitherto been accessible in English.
"The first organized effort to bring into English a series of the really significant figures in contemporary European literature. . . .An undertaking as creditable and as ambitious as any of its kind on the other side of the Atlantic."—New York Evening Post.
One of the most remarkable creative works of our time, revolving about the experiences of a man who sums up the wealth and culture of our age yet finds them wanting.
PEOPLE. By Pierre Hamp. Translated by James Whitall. With Introduction by Elizabeth Shepley Sergeant.
Introducing one of the most significant writers of France, himself a working man, in whom is incarnated the new self-consciousness of the worker's world.
The critical work of one of the great æsthetic thinkers of France, for the first time made accessible in an authorized English version.
A new interpretation of the meaning of history, and a survey of the great historians, by one of the leaders of European thought.
One of Germany's most influential thinkers and men of action presents his vision of the new society emerging out of the War.
A German "Main Street," describing the career of a typical product of militarism, in school, university, business, patriotism, and love.
Covers the whole field of Russian verse since Pushkin, with the emphasis on contemporary poets.
The first biography of Christ by a great man of letters since Renan's.
A new interpretation of the meaning of education, by one who shares with Croce the leadership of Italian thought to-day.
HARCOURT, BRACE AND COMPANY
PublishersNew York
# Modern Russian Poetry/Yurgis Baltrushaitis

Yurgis Baltrushaitis
(Born 1873)
Born into a peasant family of Lithuanian Catholics, this member of the symbolists' younger generation began by herding cows in his native village. He tutored his way through high school, and reached the University of Moscow, where he soon veered from science to letters. He became both a linguist and a traveler, going west as far as Chicago.
Although Baltrushaitis may be claimed by the Lithuanian as well as the Russian literature, this reticent poet does not often avail himself of either tongue. He carries on the philosophical tradition of Russian poetry. His disciplined and concentrated art moves on a plane of abstractions. His is a mystical austerity and a Buddhistic aloofness from things personal.
# Modern Science and Anarchism

Written in Russian as Современная наука и анархия in 1901 in four sections: Modern Science and Anarchism, Communism and Anarchy (Коммунизм и анархия), The State, Its Historic Role (Государство, его роль в истории), and The Modern State (Cовременное государство). Only the first section is translated here; the chapters were published in French in Les Temps Nouveaux in 1902-1903 and 1911. The Glossary is from the 1904 German edition.
Freedom Library
Modern Science
and
Anarchism
BY PETER KROPOTKIN
WITH GLOSSARY
LONDON FREEDOM PRESS
page
MODERN SCIENCE
AND
ANARCHISM
By P. KROPOTKIN
London: Freedom Press, 127 Ossulston Street, N.W. 1912
page
​It gives an added pleasure in publishing this important and interesting work, to know that it appears on the seventieth birthday of its author, our devoted friend and comrade, Peter Kropotkin.
FREEDOM GROUP.
December 9, 1912.
* I. The Origin of Anarchism
* II. The Intellectual Movement of the Eighteenth Century
* III. The Reaction at the Beginning of the Nineteenth Century
* IV. Comte's Positive Philosophy
* V. The Awakening in the Years 1856–1862
* VI. Herbert Spencer's Synthetic Philosophy
* VII. The Function of Law in Society
* VIII. Place of Anarchism in Modern Science
* IX. The Anarchist Ideal and the Preceding Revolutions
* X. Anarchism
* XI. Anarchism—(Continued)
* XII. Anarchism—(Continued)
* XIII. A Few Conclusions of Anarchism
* XIV. The Means of Action
* XV. Conclusion
* Glossary
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Washington (Ohio)

See also Washington Court House, Ohio on Wikipedia; and our 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica disclaimer.
​WASHINGTON (or Washington Court House), a city and the county-seat of Fayette county, Ohio, U.S.A., on Paint Creek, 35 m. S.E. of Springfield. Pop. (1880) 3798, (1890) 5742, (1900) 5751 (708 negroes); (1910) 7277. It is served by the Baltimore & Ohio, the Cincinnati & Muskingum Valley (Pennsylvania Lines), the Detroit, Toledo & Ironton, and the Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton railways. It is in a rich farming and stock and poultry-raising region, has a large poultry-packing house and various manufactures. Washington, or Washington Court House as it is often called to distinguish it from the ​village of Washington in Guernsey county, Ohio, was laid out in 1810 and was chartered as a city in 1888.
# 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Washington (Indiana)

See also Washington, Indiana on Wikipedia; and our 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica disclaimer.
​WASHINGTON, a city and county-seat of Daviess county, Indiana, U.S.A., about 50 m. N.E. of Evansville. Pop. (1890) 6064, (1900) 8551, of whom 391 were foreign born and 255 negroes, (1910 census) 11,404, It is served by the Baltimore & Ohio South Western (which has repair shops here) and the Evansville & Indianapolis railways. The city has a public library and a city park of 45 acres. It is the shipping point of the surrounding farming, stock-raising and coal-mining region, and there are deposits of kaolin and fireclay in the vicinity. The total value of the factory product in 1905 was $1,166,749 (48.6% more than in 1900). The municipality owns and operates the electric lighting plant. Washington was settled in 1816 and chartered as a city in 1870.
# 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Wassail

See also Wassail on Wikipedia; wassail on Wiktionary; and our 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica disclaimer.
​WASSAIL (O. Eng. was hál, “be whole,” “be well”), primarily the ancient form of “toasting,” the term being applied later to the Christmas feasting and revelries and particularly to the bowl of spiced ale or wine which was a feature of the medieval Christmas. One of the earliest references to the wassail-bowl in English history is in the description of the reception of King Vortigern by Hengist, when Rowena “came into the king's presence, with a cup of gold filled with wine in her hand, and making a low reverence unto the king said, ‘Waes hael hlaford Cyning,’ which is ‘Be of health, Lord King.’” In a collection of ordinances for the regulations of the royal household in Henry VII.'s reign, the steward on Twelfth Night was to cry “wassail” three times on entering with the bowl, the royal chaplain responding with a song. Wassailing was as much a custom in the monasteries as in laymen's houses, the bowl being known as poculum Caritatis. What was popularly known as wassailing was the custom of trimming with ribbons and sprigs of rosemary a bowl which was carried round the streets by young girls singing carols at Christmas and the New Year. This ancient custom still survives here and there, especially in Yorkshire, where the bowl is known as “the vessel cup,” and is made of holly and evergreens, inside which are placed one or two dolls trimmed with ribbons. This cup is borne on a stick by children who go from house to house singing Christmas carols. In Devonshire and elsewhere it was the custom to wassail the orchards on Christmas and New Year's eve. Pitchers of ale or cider were poured over the roots of the trees to the accompaniment of a rhyming toast to their healths.
# Marin v. Lalley/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
84 U.S. 14
Marin v. Lalley
As the Code of Practice requires that three days' notice be given to the debtor, and the judge is required to examine and decide whether the instrument unites all the requisites of the law necessary to authorize this summary proceeding, his decision is a judgment or decree, and an appeal lies from it; for it may be erroneously made on evidence not warranting the issuing of the executory process. It is in substance a decree of foreclosure and sale, which has repeatedly been held to be a final decree.
In the case before us it seems there was an appearance by the defendants, who filed their objections, which were overruled. Some further proceedings were had, and an appeal was allowed by this court to operate as a supersedeas.
If there were any doubt as to the finality of the original order, there can be none that it became final when the answer and objections were overruled. That order seems to have been made contradictorily with the debtors. Their opposition was overruled and their property decreed to be seized and sold to pay their debts. This case is quite distinguishable from that of Levy v. Fitzpatrick. In that case there was an order for executory process upon a mortgage where the debtors resided in different States, but having signed and acknowledged the mortgage, were presumed, according to the law of Louisiana, to be before the judge. This court would not entertain an appeal from a judgment rendered by the Circuit Court against any defendant who had not been actually served with process and had entered no appearance.
Incidentally, it is true, the court held the order not to be a final judgment according to the laws of Louisiana. But this was said of the original order, without the three days' notice and without any act on the part of the debtors.
In the present case the debtors appeared by their opposition, which was overruled and the original order made final. In such a case, the opinion of the court shows that the writ of error would have been sustained, apart from the objections growing out of the want of service of parties. We have held, however, in the case of Walker v. Dreville, that no writ of error lies, where the proceeding below, in its essential nature, is a foreclosure of a mortgage in chancery. If this case had been brought here by writ of error, as the case of Levy v. Fitzpatrick was, it must have been dismissed. The only proper mode of bringing it here was by appeal.
From what has been said it follows that the motion in the present case must be
DENIED.

## Notes

* ↑ Harrod v. Voorhies's Administratrix, 16 Louisiana, 256.
* ↑ Ray v. Law, 3 Cranch, 180; Whiting v. Bank of the United States, 13 Peters, 15; Bronson v. Railroad Co., 2 Black, 524.
* ↑ Martin, J., dissenting, in Grant v. Walden, 6 Louisiana, 635.
* ↑ 15 Peters, 170.
* ↑ 12 Wallace, 440.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Marin v. Augedahl

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
247 U.S. 142
Marin v. Augedahl
Argued: March 18, 1918. --- Decided: May 20, 1918
[Syllabus intentionally omitted]
Mr. Edward Engerud, of Fargo, N. D., and Mr. Arthur A. Miller, of Crookston, Minn., for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Emerson H. Smith, of Fargo. N. D., for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Moon v. Maryland

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Black

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
398 U.S. 319
Moon v. Maryland
Argued: April 22, 1970. --- Decided: June 8, 1970
Robert Anthony Jacques, Rockville, Md., for petitioner.
Edward F. Borgerding, Baltimore, Md., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Moon v. Maryland/Concurrence Black

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Black
* Dissenting Opinion Douglas
United States Supreme Court
398 U.S. 319
Moon v. Maryland
Argued: April 22, 1970. --- Decided: June 8, 1970
Mr. Justice BLACK concurs in the result.
Mr. Justice HARLAN would reverse the judgment below based on his separate opinions in Desist v. United States, 394 U.S. 244, 256, 89 S.Ct. 1030, 1037, and in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 744, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 2085.
Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the decision of this case.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Moonfleet

* related portals: Children's literature.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
[Advertisements]
UNIFORM WITH THIS VOLUME
And Many Other Equally Popular Copyright Novels.
NELSON'S LIBRARY.
Elzevir’s answer was to cock the pistol, and prime the powder in the pan.
Moonfleet
J. MEADE FALKNER
Thomas Nelson and Sons, London, Edinburgh, and New York
CONTENTS.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1932, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 91 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mooney v. Holohan

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
294 U.S. 103
Mooney v. Holohan
Argued: Jan. 21, 1935. ---
Messrs. Frank P. Walsh, of New York City, John F. Finerty, of Washington, D.C., and George T. Davis, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
Mr. U.S. Webb, Atty. Gen., of California, for the State of California.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 104-108 intentionally omitted]
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Ustyug Velikiy

See also Ustyug Velikiy on Wikipedia; and our 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica disclaimer.
​USTYUG VELIKIY, a town of Russia, in the government of Vologda, 216 m. N.E. from the city of Vologda, on the navigable Sukhona river, near its confluence with the Yug. Pop. (1885) 8119; (1897) 11,309. It manufactures hosiery, woollens and linens, has sawmills, and carries on an active trade in corn, hemp, flax, bristles and butter, which it exports. It has two important yearly fairs. Its artisans are famous for their jewelry, for engraving upon silver and the fabrication of boxes with secret locks.
# 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Usk (river)

See also River Usk on Wikipedia; and our 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica disclaimer.
​USK, a river of Wales and England, rising on the borders of Carmarthenshire and Brecknockshire, and flowing to the Bristol Channel with a course of 70 m., and a drainage area of 540 sq. m. The source lies at an elevation of 1700 ft. on the north flank of Carmarthen Van, a summit of the Brecon Beacons; and the course is at first northerly, but soon turns east through a beautiful valley closely beset with lofty hills. The river passes the finely situated town of Brecon, and then turns south-east past Crickhowell and south past Abergavenny. Between these towns it forms a short stretch of the Welsh boundary before entering England (Monmouthshire). The valley now broadens, and the course of the river becomes sinuous as it flows by the ancient towns of Usk and Caerleon. The scenery throughout is most beautiful. Not far from the mouth lies Newport, with its extensive docks, to which the estuary gives access. Except in this part, the Usk is not used for navigation, but the Monmouthshire and Brecon and Abergavenny canals, in part following the valley, carry a small trade up to Brecon. The Usk is noted for its salmon and trout fishing.
# 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Usküb

See also Skopje on Wikipedia; and our 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica disclaimer.
​USKÜB, Uscup, or Skopia (anc. Scupi, Turk. Üshküb, Slav. Skoplye), the capital of the vilayet of Kossovo, European Turkey; on the left bank of the river Vardar, and at the junction of the railways from Nish and Mitrovitza to Salonica. Pop. (1905) about 32,000, consisting chiefly of Slavs (Serbs and Bulgars), Turks, Albanians and a few gipsies. Usküb occupies a picturesque and strategically important position at the foot of a valley which severs two mountain ranges, the Shar Planina and Kara Dagh. Main roads radiate N.W. to Prizren, W. to Gostivar, an important centre of distribution, E.N.E. to Kumanovo, and thence into Bulgaria, and S. to Koprülü and Monastir. The city is the headquarters of an army corps, and the see of an Orthodox Greek archbishop, of the archbishop of the Roman Catholic Albanians and of a Bulgarian bishop. Its principal buildings are the citadel, the palace of the vali or provincial governor, the Greek and Bulgarian schools, numerous churches and mosques and a Roman aqueduct. The industries include dyeing, weaving, tanning and the manufacture of metal-work, wine and flour, but Usküb is chiefly important as the commercial centre of the whole vilayet of Kossovo (q.v.). The Imperial Ottoman Bank and the Banque de Salonique have branches in the city, and French is to a remarkable extent the language of commerce. Usküb retains in a modified form the name of Scupi, one of the chief cities of northern Macedonia. A few unimportant ruins mark the ancient site, about 11/2 m. N.W. Scupi was destroyed by an earthquake in A.D. 518, but was rebuilt by Justinian under the name of Justiniana Prima. Up to the 14th century it was at times the capital of the Servian tsars.