OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography/Shindler, Mary Stanley Bunce Palmer

Edition of 1900.
​SHINDLER, Mary Stanley Bunce Palmer, author, b. in Beaufort, S. C., 15 Feb., 1810. Her father, the Rev. B. M. Palmer, was pastor of a Congregational church at Beaufort, and when she was three years old he removed with her to Charleston, S. C., where she was educated. In June, 1835, Miss Palmer married Charles E. Dana, and removed with him first to New York, and in 1837 to Bloomington, Iowa. On his death, soon afterward, she returned to her family in Charleston. Here she began to write, and became well known as a poet. In May, 1848, she married the Rev. Robert D. Shindler, a clergyman of the Episcopal church, who was for a time professor in Shelby college, Kentucky. She removed with her husband in 1850 to Upper Marlborough, Md., and in 1869 to Nacogdoches, Tex. She has published “The Southern Harp” (Boston, 1840); “The Northern Harp” (New York, 1841); “The Parted Family, and other Poems” (1842); “The Temperance Lyre” (1842); “Charles Morton, or the Young Patriot” (1843); “The Young Sailor” (1844); “Forecastle Tour” (1844); and “Letters to Relatives and Friends on the Trinity” (1845). She had, before her death in 1883, been a frequent contributor to popular periodicals.
# Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography/Shaubena

Edition of 1900.
​SHAUBENA, Ottawa chief, b. near Maumee river, Ohio, about 1775: d. near Morris, Ill., 27 July, 1859. His name is also spelled Shabonee, Chab-o-neh, Shab-eh-ney, Chamblee, and in other ways. He served under Tecumseh from 1807 till the battle of the Thames in 1813. In 1810 he accompanied Tecumseh and Capt. Billy Caldwell (see Sauganash) to the homes of the Pottawattamies and other tribes residing in what are now Illinois and Wisconsin, with the hope of securing the coöperation of Indian braves in driving the white settlers out of the country. At the battle of the Thames he was by the side of Tecumseh when he fell, and at the death of their leader Shaubena and Caldwell both lost faith in their British allies, and never again took sides with them. They soon afterward met Gen. Lewis Cass at Detroit, and agreed to submit to the United States. In the effort made by Black Hawk in February, 1832, to incite the Pottawattamies and Ottawas to make war against the whites, Shaubena frustrated his plans, and thus incurred the hatred of the Sac chief. In early manhood Shaubena married the daughter of a Pottawattamie chief, whose village was on the Illinois river east of the present city of Ottawa. Here he lived a few years, but removed about twenty-five miles north, to what is known as Shaubena's grove, in DeKalb county. There he and his family resided till 1837, when he was removed to western Missouri. Unfortunately, his tribe and that of Black Hawk had reservations near each ether. War began between them. His eldest son and a nephew were killed, and Shaubena went back to his old home in Illinois. After spending three years in Kansas on a new reservation, he returned again to Illinois, but found his land occupied by strangers, who rudely drove him from the grove that bore his name. The Washington officials had decided that he forfeited his title when he moved from his land. Some of his friends subsequently bought twenty acres for him on Mazon creek, near Morris, Ill., where he died. He was a superb specimen of an Indian, See “Life of Shaubena,” by N. Matson (Chicago, 1878).
# Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography/Shea, John Dawson Gilmary

Edition of 1900. The 1892 edition notes that he studied law after leaving grammar school.
​SHEA, John Dawson Gilmary, author, b. in New York city, 22 July, 1824; d. in Elizabeth, N. J., 22 Feb., 1892. He was educated at the grammar-school of Columbia college, of which his father was principal, was admitted to the bar, but devoted himself to literature. He edited the “Historical Magazine” from 1859 till 1865, was one of the founders and first president of the United States Catholic historical society, was a member or corresponding member of the principal historical societies in this country and Canada, and corresponding member of the Royal academy of history, Madrid. He had received the degree of LL. D. from St. Francis Xavier college, New York, and St. John's college, Fordham. His writings include “The Discovery and Exploration of the Mississippi Valley” (New York, 1853); “History of the Catholic Missions among the Indian Tribes of the United States” (1854; German translation, Würzburg, 1856); “The Fallen Brave” (1861); “Early Voyages up and down the Mississippi” (Albany, 1862); “Novum Belgium, an ​Account of the New Netherlands in 1643-'4” (New York, 1862); “The Operations of the French Fleet under Count de Grasse” (1864); “The Lincoln Memorial” (1865); translations of Charlevoix's “History and General Description of New France” (6 vols., 1866-'72); Hennepin's “Description of Louisiana” (1880); Le Clercq's “Establishment of the Faith” (1881); and Penalosa's “Expedition” (1882); “Catholic Church in Colonial Days” (1886); “Catholic Hierarchy of the United States” (1886); and “Life and Times of Archbishop Carroll” (1888). He also translated De Courcy's “Catholic Church in the United States” (1856); and edited the Cramoisy series of narratives and documents bearing on the early history of the French-American colonies (26 vols., 1857-'68); “Washington's Private Diary” (1861); Cadwallader Colden's “History of the Five Indian Nations,” edition of 1727 (1866); Alsop's “Maryland” (1869); a series of grammars and dictionaries of the Indian languages (15 vols., 1860-'74); and “Life of Pius IX.” (1875). He had also published “Bibliography of American Catholic Bibles and Testaments” (1859), corrected several of the very erroneous Catholic Bibles, and revised by the Vulgate Challoner's original Bible of 1750 (1871), and had issued several prayer-books, school histories, Bible dictionaries, and translations.
# Arceneaux v. Louisiana

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
376 U.S. 336
Arceneaux v. Louisiana
Argued: Jan. 15, 1964. --- Decided: March 9, 1964
J. Minos Simon, Lafayette, La., for petitioner.
Bertrand DeBlanc, Lafayette, La., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Archaeologia

Archaeologia is a periodical, published from 1770 onwards by the Society of Antiquaries of London.
* Volume 13 (transcription project)
* Volume 38 (transcription volumes: 1, 2)
# Arch of Claudius

inscribed on arches on the Aqua Virgo in Rome, at Boulogne, France, and at Cysicus, Turkey, AD 51 or 52
The Roman Senate and People to Tiberius Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, son of Drusus, Pontifex Maximus, Tribunician power eleven times, Consul five times, Imperator 22 times, Censor, Father of the Fatherland, because he received the surrender of eleven kings of the Britons defeated without any loss, and first brought barbarian peoples across the Ocean into the dominion of the Roman people.

## User annotations

* ↑ Claudius's fifth consulship was in 51. (Wikisource contributor note)
* ↑ The Cyzicus inscription ends here. (Wikisource contributor note)
# Aspasia

O, ye Athenians, drunken with self-praise
* "Aspasia" in The New Penelope (1877)
* "Aspasia" in Poems (1900)
# Aspden v. Nixon

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
45 U.S. 467
Aspden v. Nixon

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barnes v. The Railroads

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Strong
United States Supreme Court
84 U.S. 294
Barnes v. The Railroads

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barnes v. Texas/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
380 U.S. 253
Barnes v. Texas
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Giordenello v. United States, 357 U.S. 480, 78 S.Ct. 1245, 2 L.Ed.2d 1053; Aguilar v. State of Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed.2d 723.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barnes v. Williams

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
24 U.S. 415
Barnes v. Williams

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barnes v. Williams/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
THIS case was argued by Mr. Wickliffe and Mr. Talbot, for the plaintiffs, and by Mr. White and Mr. Isaacks, for the defendant.
Mr. Chief Justice MARSHALL stated, that, upon inspecting the record, it had been discovered, that the special verdict found in the case was too imperfect to enable the Court to render a judgment upon it.
The claim of the plaintiffs being founded upon a bequest of certain slaves, it was essential to a recovery at law, that the assent of the executor to the legacy should be proved. Although, in the opinion of the Court, there was sufficient evidence in the special verdict from which the jury might have found the fact, yet they have not found it, and the Court could not, upon a special verdict, intend it. The special verdict was defective in stating the evidence of the fact, instead of the fact itself. It was impossible, therefore, that a judgment could be pronounced for the plaintiff. So, as to the defendant's defence under the statute of limitations, the special verdict did not find any facts by which the Court could ascertain at that time the right of action accrued. It was not stated that the plaintiff and defendant were ever resident in the same State at the same time. Although it was found, that E. D. Barnes, one of the plaintiffs, came into the State of Tennessee after he arrived at the age of twenty-one years, and more than three years before the suit was brought, yet it was not found, that during any part of that time, the defendant, Williams, was resident in that State. The case was, therefore, too imperfectly stated to enable the Court to decide the questions upon which the opinions of the Judges of the Circuit Court were opposed, and the cause was remanded to that Court, with directions to award a venire facias de novo.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barnet v. National Bank

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
98 U.S. 555
Barnet v. National Bank
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Submitted on printed arguments by Mr. R. B. Wilson, Mr. Samuel Shellabarger, and Mr. Jeremiah M. Wilson, for the plaintiffs in error, and by Mr. M. B. Hagans for the defendant in error.
MR. JUSTICE SWAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barnes v. Texas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
380 U.S. 253
Barnes v. Texas
Clyde W. Woody, for petitioner.
Waggoner Carr, Atty. Gen. of Texas, and Howard M. Fender, Charles B. Swanner, Gilbert J. Pena and Allo B. Crow, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Barnes v. North Carolina/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
375 U.S. 28
Barnes v. North Carolina
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, 375 U.S. 2, at p. 3, 84 S.Ct. 80, at p. 81, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Around the World in Seventy-Two Days

* related portals: Travel writing.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category.
This is a true account by American woman journalist who, in 1889, set out to see whether she could beat the fictional journey in Jules Verne’s 1873 novel, Around the World in Eighty Days. Wearing one dress and carrying one handbag, Elizabeth Cochrane Seaman (pen name "Nellie Bly"), reported her travels back to avid readers in America. one or more chapters are available in a spoken word format.
* Chapter I: A Proposal to Girdle the Earth
* Chapter II: The Start
* Chapter III: Southampton to Jules Verne's
* Chapter IV: Jules Verne at Home
* Chapter V: On to Brindisi
* Chapter VI: An American Heiress
* Chapter VII: "Two Beautiful Black Eyes"
* Chapter VIII: Aden to Colombo
* Chapter IX: Delayed Five Days
* Chapter X: In the Pirate Seas
* Chapter XI: Against the Monsoon
* Chapter XII: British China
* Chapter XIII: Christmas in Canton
* Chapter XIV: To the land of the Mikado
* Chapter XV: One hundred and twenty hours in Japan
* Chapter XVI: Across the Pacific
* Chapter XVII: Across the Continent
* Chapter XVIII: The Record
* L'Envoi
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ascent of Mount Carmel/Book 2/Chapter X

CHAPTER X
Wherein distinction is made between all apprehensions and types of knowledge which can be comprehended by the understanding.
In order to treat in detail of the profit and the harm which may come to the soul, with respect to this means to Divine union which we have described — namely, faith — through the ideas and apprehensions of the understanding, it is necessary here to make a distinction between all the apprehensions, whether natural or supernatural, that the soul may receive, so that then, with regard to each of them in order, we may direct the understanding with greater clearness into the night and obscurity of faith. This will be done with all possible brevity.
2. It must be known, then, that the understanding can receive knowledge and intelligence by two channels: the one natural and the other supernatural. By the natural channel is meant all that the understanding can understand, whether by means of the bodily senses or by its own power. The supernatural channel is all that is given to the understanding over and above its natural ability and capacity.
3. Of these kinds of supernatural knowledge, some are corporeal and some are spiritual. The corporeal are two in number: some are received by means of the outward bodily senses; others, by means of the inward bodily senses, wherein is comprehended all that the imagination can comprehend, form and conceive.
4. The spiritual supernatural knowledge is likewise of two kinds: that which is distinct and special in its nature, and that which is confused, general and dark. Of the distinct and special kind there are four manners of apprehension which are communicated to the spirit without the aid of any bodily sense: these are visions, revelations, locutions and spiritual feelings. The obscure and general type of knowledge is of one kind alone, which is contemplation that is given in faith. To this we have to lead the soul by bringing it thereto through all these other means, beginning with the first and detaching it from them.

## Footnotes

* ↑ [Lit., ‘by itself.’]
# Atlantic City Electric Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
288 U.S. 152
Atlantic City Electric Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Argued: Dec. 13, 1932. --- Decided: Feb 6, 1933
Mr. Graham Summer, of New York City for petitioner.
The Attorney General and Mr. G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic City Railroad Company v. Parker

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
242 U.S. 56
Atlantic City Railroad Company v. Parker
Argued: November 16, 1916. --- Decided: December 4, 1916
Messrs. Thomas E. French, Samuel H. Richards, and Charles Heebner for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 57 intentionally omitted]
Mr. David O. Watkins for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic Cleaners Dyers v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
286 U.S. 427
Atlantic Cleaners Dyers v. United States
Argued: April 28, 1932. --- Decided: May 23, 1932
Messrs. Dale D. Drain and Alvin L. Newmyer, both of Washington, D. C., for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 428-429 intentionally omitted]
Mr. John LordO'Brian, Asst. to Atty. Gen., for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from page 430 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic Coast Line Company v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers

United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 1201
Atlantic Coast Line Company v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers
Dennis G. Lyons, Frank X. Friedmann, Jr., David M. Foster, John W. Weldon, and John S.C.ox, on the application.
Allan Milledge and Richard L. Horn, in opposition.
Mr. Justice BLACK, Circuit Justice.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic Coast Line Company v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen

United States Supreme Court
385 U.S. 20
Atlantic Coast Line Company v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen
Paul A. Porter and Dennis G. Lyons (Abe Krash and Daniel A. Bezneck, on the briefs), for petitioners.
Neal Rutledge and Allan Milledge (Lester P. Schoene, on the brief), for respondents.
On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic Coast Line Company v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
385 U.S. 20
Atlantic Coast Line Company v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic City Railroad Company v. Parker/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
242 U.S. 56
Atlantic City Railroad Company v. Parker
Argued: November 16, 1916. --- Decided: December 4, 1916
This is an action brought by the defendant in error to recover for the loss of an arm crushed while he was coupling a tender to a car. There is no dispute that the case is governed by the acts of Congress-the Safety Appliance Act of March 2, 1893, chap. 196, §§ 2, 8, 27 Stat. at L. 531, Comp. Stat. 1913, §§ 8606, 8612, and the Employers' Liability Act of April 22, 1908, chap. 149, §§ 3, 4, 35 Stat. at L. 65, Comp. Stat. 1913, §§ 8659, 8660. The facts material here are few. The engine had backed for the purpose of coupling with the car and had failed to couple automatically by impact. Thereupon the plaintiff, noticing that the drawhead was not in line with the one on the engine, put in his arm for the purpose of straightening it and thus making the coupling possible, and was caught. An exception was taken to the refusal of a ruling that no negligence was shown on the part of the railroad company, but the court of errors and appeals affirmed the judgment of the court below. 87 N. J. L. 148, 93 Atl. 574.
If there was evidence that the railroad failed to furnish such 'couplers coupling automatically by impact' as the statute requires (Johnson v. Southern P. Co. 196 U.S. 1, 18, 19, 49 L. ed. 363, 369, 370, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 158, 17 Am. Neg. Rep. 412), nothing else needs to be considered. We are of opinion that there was enough evidence to go to the jury upon that point. No doubt there are arguments that the jury should have decided the other way. Some lateral play must be allowed to drawheads, and, further, the car was on a curve, which, of course, would tend to throw the coupler out of line. But the jury were warranted in finding that the curve was so slight as not to affect the case, and in regarding the track as, for this purpose, a straight line. If couplers failed to couple automatically upon a straight track, it at least may be said that a jury would be werranted in finding that a lateral play so great as to prevent coupling was not needed, and that, in the absence of any explanation believed by them, the failure indicated that the railroad had not fully complied with the law. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. United States, 220 U.S. 559, 571, 55 L. ed. 582, 586, 31 Sup. Ct. Rep. 612; Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Brown, 229 U.S. 317, 320, 321, 57 L. ed. 1204-1206, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 840, 3 N. C. C. A. 826; San Antonio & A. Pass R. Co. v. Wagner, 241 U.S. 476, 484, 60 L. ed. 1110, 1117, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 626.
Judgment affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse