OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Notes on New Zealand (1892)

* related portals: New Zealand.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
NOTES ON NEW ZEALAND
BY
W E SWANTON
LONDON EDEN, REMINGTON & CO PUBLISHERS
15 KING STREET, COVENT GARDEN
1892
[All Rights Reserved]
PREFACE.
These notes are intended to embody, in the smallest possible compass, a description of some of the more important features of the country, trade, and productions of New Zealand. I have also ventured to express some of the conclusions at which I have arrived after several years of varied experience in the Colonies, conclusions which, it will be observed, are generally favourable to New Zealand as a field of enterprise and ​emigration in preference to the other divisions of Australasia.
I am fully sensible that this work, brief as it is, is not without its shortcomings and defects, but the main object of its pages will be accomplished if it succeeds in correcting some of the mistaken impressions brought home and disseminated by tourists, and in conveying to the intending emigrant some useful hints concerning one of Great Britain's most valuable possessions.
W. E. S.
Cheltenham, December, 1891.
* The Country
* Agriculture
* Mining and Minerals
* Manufactures
* Social and Political
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Notes on Nursing: What It Is, and What It Is Not/Appendix

APPENDIX.
NOTE AS TO THE NUMBER OF WOMEN EMPLOYED AS
NURSES IN GREAT BRITAIN.
25,466 were returned, at the census of 1851, as nurses by profession, 39,139 nurses in domestic service, and 2,822 midwives. The numbers of different ages are shown in table A, and in table B their distribution over Great Britain.
To increase the efficiency of this class, and to make as many of them as possible the disciples of the true doctrines of health, would be a great national work.
For there the material exists, and will be used for nursing, whether the real "conclusion of the matter " be to nurse or poison the sick. A man, who stands perhaps at the head of our medical profession, once said to me, "I send a nurse into a private family to nurse the sick, but I know that is only to do them harm."
Now a nurse means any person in charge of the personal health of another. And, in the preceding notes, the term nurse is used indiscriminately for amateur and professional nurses. For, besides nurses of the sick and nurses of children, the numbers of whom are here given, there are friends or relations who take temporary charge of a sick person, there are mothers of families. It appears as if these unprofessional nurses were just as much in want of knowledge of the laws of health as professional ones.
Then there are the schoolmistresses of all national and other schools throughout the kingdom. How many of children's epidemics originate in these! Then the proportion of girls in these schools who become mothers or members among the 64,000 nurses recorded above, or schoolmistresses in their turn. If the laws of health, as far as regards fresh air, cleanliness, light, &c., were taught to these, would this not prevent some
Table A.
GREAT BRITAIN.
ages.
| Nurses. | All Ages. | Under 5 Years. | 5- | 10- | 15- | 20- | 25- | 30- | 35- | 40- | 45- | 50- | 55- | 60- | 65- | 70- | 75- | 80- | 85 and Upwards |
| Nurse (not Domestic Servant) | 25,466 | . . . . . | . . . | . . . . | . . . . . | 624 | 817 | 1,118 | 1,359 | 2,223 | 2,748 | 3,982 | 3,456 | 3,825 | 2,542 | 1,568 | 746 | 311 | 147 |
| Nurse (Domestic Servant) | 39,139 | . . . . . | 508 | 7,259 | 10,355 | 6,537 | 4,174 | 2,495 | 1,681 | 1,468 | 1,206 | 1,196 | 833 | 712 | 369 | 204 | 101 | 25 | 16 |
Table B.
AGED 20 YEARS, AND AND UPWARDS.
| Nurses | Nurse (not Domestic Servant) | Nurse (Domestic Servant) |
| Great Britain and Islands in the British Seas. | 25,466 | 21,017 |
| England and Wales. | 23,751 | 18,945 |
| Scotland. | 1,543 | 1,922 |
| Islands in the British Seas. | 172 | 150 |
| 1st Division. London. | 7,807 | 5,061 |
| 2nd Division. South Eastern. | 2,878 | 2,514 |
| 3rd Division. South Midland. | 2,286 | 1,252 |
| 4th Division. Eastern Counties. | 2,408 | 959 |
| 5th Division. South Western Counties. | 3,055 | 1,737 |
| 6th Division. West Midland Counties. | 1,225 | 2,283 |
| 7th Division. North Midland Counties. | 1,003 | 957 |
| 8th Division. North Western Counties. | 970 | 2,135 |
| 9th Division. Yorkshire. | 1,074 | 1,023 |
| 10th Division. Northern Counties. | 402 | 410 |
| 11th Division. Monmouth and Wales. | 343 | 614 |
# Notes on Nursing: What It Is, and What It Is Not

* information about this edition.
* related portals: Nursing.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
(transcription project)
NOTES ON NURSING:
WHAT IT IS, AND WHAT IT IS NOT.
BY
FLORENCE NIGHTINGALE.
WITH SOME ACCOUNT OF HER LIFE.
BOSTON:
WILLIAM CARTER, 5 WATER STREET
1860.
| Preface | iii |
| Biography | i |
| Florence Nightingale | 1 |
| Index | 5 |
| Introduction | 7 |
| Ventilation and Warming | 11 |
| Health of Houses | 19 |
| Petty Management | 27 |
| Noise | 34 |
| Variety | 44 |
| Taking Food | 48 |
| What Food? | 53 |
| Bed and Bedding | 60 |
| Light | 64 |
| Cleanliness of Rooms and Walls | 66 |
| Personal Cleanliness | 70 |
| Chattering Hopes and Advices | 72 |
| Observation of the Sick | 79 |
| Conclusion | 95 |
| Appendix | 103 |
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Notes on National Security Council Meeting, July 20, 1961

TOP SECRET
EYES ONLY
Notes on National Security Council Meeting
July 20, 1961
General Hickey, Chairman of the Net Evaluation Subcommittee, presented the annual report of his group. General Lemnitzer stated that the assumption of this year's study was a surprise attack in late 1963, preceded by a period of heightened tensions.
After the presentation by General Hickey and by the various members of the Subcommittee, the President asked if there had ever been made an assessment of damage results to the U.S.S.R which would be incurred by a preemptive attack. General Lemnitzer stated that such studies had been made and that he would bring them over and discuss them personally with the President. In recalling General Hickey's opening statement that these studies have been made since 1957, the President asked for an appraisal of the trend in the effectiveness of the attack. General Lemnitzer replied that he would also discuss this with the President.
Since the basic assumption of this year's presentation was an attack in late 1963, the President asked about probable effects in the winter of 1962. Mr. Dulles observed that the attack would be much less effective since there would be considerably fewer missiles involved. General Lemnitzer added a word of caution about accepting the precise findings of the Committee since these findings were based upon certain assumptions which themselves might not be valid.
The President posed the question as to the period of time necessary for citizens to remain in shelters following an attack. A member of the Subcommittee replied that no specific period of time could be cited due to the variables involved, but generally speaking, a period of two weeks should be expected.
The President directed that no member in attendance at the meeting disclose even the subject of the meeting.
Declassified: June, 1993

## Source

* James K. Galbraith and Heather A. Purcell (Fall 1994). "Did the U.S. Military Plan a Nuclear First Strike for 1963?". The American Prospect. Cite uses deprecated parameter |month= (help)
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# North Dakota Law Review/Volume 1/Number 7/Is There Not More to It?

IS THERE NOT MORE TO IT?
Elsewhere in this issue we reprint an editorial from the Fargo Forum of June 4th. It is a readable article, but is it constructive? If nothing more were said or done, would it do more than discredit the legal profession?
Suppose we agree, first, that intelligence and ability to weigh evidence, rather than lack of intelligence or disinterestedness, should govern in the selection of juries. That does not argue that intelligence and ability to weigh evidence, together with disinterestedness, would not be better.
Who would want to trust the lives of individuals or the rights of society to those who have previously formed opinions? Who having formed an opinion, can judge matters brought before him with due regard for the rights of all parties concerned? And who, having read the mass of “stuff” that has been printed about the particular case referred to in the editorial, could have kept his mind free from a prejudicial opinion for or against?
The problem confronting the Bar and the public isn’t solved by saying that the fault lies in “the way in which attorneys make use of the jury system.” All the fault does not lie there. Some of it may lie in “many peculiarities of the system.” Some of it may lie in the ready catering to an apparent desire for salacious and sensational news. Some of it may even lie in the unwillingness of legislators to listen to the lawyers.
The Bar would appreciate the aid of any outside agency in solving the problem. It has been and is giving earnest and vigorous attention to it. It is not asleep, nor has it given up.
Suppose the writer of the editorial had been charged with a similar crime, what would he have said then?
—Seck.
# North Dakota Law Review/Volume 1/Number 8

BAR BRIEFS
PUBLISHED MONTHLY AT BISMARCK
——By——
STATE BAR ASSOCIATION OF NORTH DAKOTA
Entered as Second Class Matter Jan. 15, 1925, at the Postoffice at Bismarck, North Dakota, Under the Act of August 24, 1912
* A Challenge to the Legal Profession
* Lawyers and Legal Procedure
* Review of Important Decisions
* U.S. Supreme Court Decisions
* Report of H. C. Young
* Attention, Committee Chairmen!
* Lest Ye Forget
* On Convention Program
* Powers of Appointment
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# North Dakota Reports/Volume 1/Baker v. Marsh

​Edward L. Baker et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Lucius D. Marsh et al., Defendants and Respondents.
1. Mortgages—Foreclosure—Sale.
Where a debt is secured by mortgage on several parcels of lands, and the court finds that the mortgagee is entitled to a sale thereof, it has no authority to except any part thereof from the decree of sale, though the value of the remainder is greater than the amount of the debt.
(Opinion Filed February 5, 1890.)
APPEAL from district court, Barnes county; Hon. William H. Francis, Judge.
Action by Edward L. Baker and others, trustees of the estate of Robert H. Baker, deceased, against Lucius D. Marsh, as administrator of John Marsh, deceased, John Kurtz, Phebe Marsh, and others, to foreclose a mortgage on three parcels of land executed by John Marsh and John Kurtz to Robert H. Baker. One of these parcels of land had been conveyed to Phebe Marsh subsequent to the mortgage, and improvements had been made thereon by her. The case was referred, for the taking of testimony and ascertaining the value of the premises. The value of the two parcels was found to be greater than the mortgage debt. The court found that plaintiffs were entitled to the sale of all the premises, but decreed that the two parcels be sold, and the other be excepted from the sale; and plaintiffs appeal.
​A. C. Labrie, (Stone, Newman & Resser, of counsel,) for appellants. Herman Winterer, for respondents.
Per Curiam. This action was brought to foreclose a mortgage. Judgment in the court below was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, decreeing the foreclosure of the mortgage, and the sale of only a portion of the mortgaged premises. On what theory the trial court discharged a portion of the mortgaged property from the lien of the mortgage, we fail to understand. The creditor has a right to resort to his entire security in a legal manner, and to deprive him of that right is judicial confiscation. The judgment of the district court is reversed, and that court is directed to enter judgment of foreclosure and sale, as prayed for in the complaint. All the judges concur.
# North Dakota Law Review/Volume 1/Number 7/Request for Action from Committee on Fees

REQUEST FOR ACTION FROM COMMITTEE ON FEES
It appears that there are some few members of the Bar violating the schedule of fees, particularly with respect to mortgage foreclosures.
I feel that this is regrettable and deplorable if we cannot do for the Bar of North Dakota what is being done in other States. I, therefore, suggest, and use Bar Briefs as a medium of transmitting this request, that in each county in the State the President of the County Bar Association, or, if there be none, the State’s Atorney, or, if he refuses to act, a member of the Bar, call a meeting of the Bar and discuss the situation and report to me as Chairman of the Committee on Compensation and Fees.
This is important and I trust the Bar will act.
F. T. CUTHBERT, Chairman Devils Lake, N. D.
# North Dakota Reports

* Volume 1
* Volume 2
* Volume 3
* Volume 4
* Volume 5
* Volume 6
* Volume 7
* Volume 8
* Volume 9
* Volume 10
* Volume 11
* Volume 12
* Volume 13
* Volume 14
* Volume 15
* Volume 16
* Volume 17
* Volume 18
* Volume 19
* Volume 20
* Volume 21
* Volume 22
* Volume 23
* Volume 24
* Volume 25
* Volume 26
* Volume 27
* Volume 28
* Volume 29
* Volume 30
* Volume 31
* Volume 32
* Volume 33
* Volume 34
* Volume 35
* Volume 36
* Volume 37
* Volume 38
* Volume 39
* Volume 40
* Volume 41
* Volume 42
* Volume 43
* Volume 44
* Volume 45
* Volume 46
* Volume 47
* Volume 48
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# North Dakota Reports/Volume 1

REPORTS OF CASE
DECIDED IN THE
SUPREME COURT
OF THE
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA,
EDITED BY
EDGAR W. CAMP, Reporter.
VOLUME 1
BISMARCK:
TRIBUNE CO., STATE PRINTERS,
1891
Entered, according to act of Congress, in the year A. D., eighteen hundred and ninety-one,
By EDGAR W. CAMP,
In the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D.C.
OFFICERS OF THE COURT DURING THE PERIOD OF THESE REPORTS.
Hon. Guy C. H. Corliss, of Grand Forks, Chief Justice.
Hon. J. M. Bartholomew, of Bismarck, and
Hon. Alfred Wallin, of Fargo, Judges.
R. D. Hoskins, Bismarck, Clerk.
Edgar W. Camp, Jamestown, Reporter.
CONSTITUTION OF NORTH DAKOTA.
Sec. 101. When a judgment or decree is reversed or confirmed by the supreme court, every point fairly arising upon the record of the case shall be considered and decided, and the reasons therefor shall be concisely stated in writing, signed by the judges concurring, filed in the office of the clerk of the supreme court and preserved with a record of the case. Any judge dissenting therefrom, may give the reasons of his dissent in writing over his signature.
Sec. 102. It shall be the duty of the court to prepare a syllabus of the points adjudicated in each case, which shall be concurred in by a majority of the judges thereof, and it shall be prefixed to the published reports of the case.
TABLE OF CASES REPORTED IN THIS VOLUME.
# Not Sickness stains the Brave

Not Sickness stains the Brave, Nor any Dart, Nor Doubt of Scene to come, But an adjourning Heart —
# Not They Who Soar

* "Not They who Soar", published in Lyrics of Lowly Life (1896)
* "Not They Who Soar", published in The Complete Poems of Paul Laurence Dunbar (1913)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Not Understanding

From Smart Set, 1902
NOT UNDERSTANDING
Because you do not understand,
I open all my heart to you;
Tell all the things I hope to do,
And all the dreams my heart has planned.
With eyes serene you wisely nod— Because you do not understand.
Because you do not understand,
I tell you of my love and hate,
My sorrow and my fear of fate;
That which I crave and know is banned.
You smile with wise, unseeing eyes— Because you do not understand.
Because you do not understand,
I tell you of my grief and care.
It adds no jot to what you bear;
You are too simply, singly planned.
I ease my whole sick soul to you— Because—you cannot understand!
Ethel Watts Mumford.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1940, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 83 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Not One by Heaven defrauded stay—

Not One by Heaven defrauded stay — Although he seem to steal He restitutes in some sweet way Secreted in his will —
# Not Understood and Other Poems/An Exile’s Reverie

AN EXILE’S REVERIE.
# Not Understood and Other Poems/A Paper from Home

A PAPER FROM HOME.
# Not Understood and Other Poems/A Winter Lyric

A WINTER LYRIC.
# Not Understood and Other Poems/Annihilation

ANNIHILATION.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume III/Theodoret/Letters/Letter 153

CLIII. Report of the same to the Empresses Pulcheria and Eudoxia.
We had expected to be able to report to your pious majesties in different terms, but we are now compelled to make known to you the following facts, forced as we are by the irregular exercise of despotic power by Cyril of Alexandria and Memnon of Ephesus. The proper course to have been pursued, in accordance with the laws of the Church, and the command of your pious majesties, would have been to wait for the arrival of the godly bishops on the road, and in common with them to examine into the questions at issue concerning the true faith, and investigate the point offered for discussion, and, after exact enquiry, to confirm the doctrines of the apostles. They had written to me that they would wait for our arrival. They heard that we were only three stages off. Then they assembled an unconstitutional council by themselves, and have ventured on proceedings iniquitous, irregular, and bristling with absurdities. And this they have done though the most honourable count Candidianus, sent by your pious and Christian majesties for good order’s sake, expressly charged them, alike in writing and by word of mouth, to wait for the arrival of the godly bishops who had been convened, and to attempt no innovation on the true faith, but to take their stand on the directions of our godly-minded sovereigns. Now in spite of their having heard the imperial letter and the advice of the most honourable count Candidianus, they have nevertheless made naught of due order. As the prophet says “They hatch cockatrice’ eggs, and weave the spider’s web; and he that would eat of their eggs when he breaks them findeth rottenness, and therein is a viper,” Wherefore we confidently cry “Their webs shall not become garments, neither shall they cover themselves with their works.”
They have shut the churches and the martyrs’ shrines; they have forbidden the celebration of the holy feast of Pentecost; besides this they have sent the minions of their disorderly despotism into bishops’ private houses, uttering shocking threats, and forcing them to affix their signatures to illegal acts. We therefore considering all their preposterous conduct, have deposed the aforenamed Cyril and Memnon, and deprived them of their episcopate. Their associates in irregularity, whether influenced by sycophancy or by fear, we have excommunicated, until, coming to a knowledge of their own wounds, they shall heartily repent, shall anathematize the heretical Chapters of Cyril, which are tainted with the heresy of Apollinarius, Arius, and Eunomius, shall recover the faith of the Fathers in Council at Nicæa, and, in obedience to the pious commands of our Christian sovereigns, shall, peacefully and without any tumult, assemble in synod, be willing to examine with care the questions submitted to them, and honestly protect the purity of the faith of the Gospel.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Is. lix. 5, lxx.
* ↑ Is. lix. 6
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume III/Theodoret/Letters/Letter 15

XV. To Silvanus the Primate.
I know that in my words of consolation I am somewhat late, but it is not without reason that I have delayed to send them, for I have thought it worth while to let the violence of your grief take its course. The cleverest physicians will never apply their remedies when a fever is at its height, but wait for a favourable opportunity for using the appliances of their skill. So after reckoning how sharp your anguish must be, I have let these few days go by, for if I myself was so distressed and filled with such sorrow by the news, what must not have been the sufferings of a husband and yoke-fellow, made, as the Scripture says, one flesh, at the violent sundering of the union cemented both by time and love? Such pangs are only natural; but let reason devise consolation by reminding you that humanity is frail and sorrow universal, and also of the hope of the resurrection and the will of Him who orders our lives wisely. We must needs accept the decrees of inestimable wisdom, and own them to be for our good; for they who reflect thus piously shall reap piety’s rewards, and so delivered from immoderate lamentations shall pass their lives in peace. On the other hand they whom sorrow makes its slaves will gain nothing by their wailing, but will at once live weary lives and grieve the Guardian of us all. Receive then, my most honoured friend, a fatherly exhortation “The Lord gave and the Lord hath taken away. He hath done whatsoever pleased Him. Blessed be the name of the Lord.”

## Footnotes

* ↑ cf. note on p. 261. Nothing is known of this Silvanus.
* ↑ Gen. ii. 24
* ↑ Job i. 21
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume III/Theodoret/Letters/Letter 148

CXLVIII in the Edition of Garnerius.
Is “the minute of the most holy bishop Cyril, delivered to Posidonius, when sent by him to Rome, in the matter of Nestorius.” (Cyrill. Ep. XI. tom. lxxvii. 85.)
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume III/Theodoret/Letters/Letter 149

CXLIX is “Copy of the Letter written by John, Bishop of Antioch, to Nestorius.”
This letter has sometimes been supposed to have been really composed by Theodoret.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Vide Migne Pat. lxxvii. 1449. “A letter so admirable in tone and feeling, so happy in its expression, that it has been attributed to the practised pen of Theodoret.” (Canon Venables, Dict. Christ. Biog. iii. 350.) Tillemont describes it as “très belle, très bien faite et très digne de la réputation qu’avait ce prèlat.”