OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume I/Church History of Eusebius/Book III/Chapter 19

Chapter XIX.—Domitian commands the Descendants of David to be slain.
But when this same Domitian had commanded that the descendants of David should be slain, an ancient tradition says that some of the heretics brought accusation against the descendants of Jude (said to have been a brother of the Saviour according to the flesh), on the ground that they were of the lineage of David and were related to Christ himself. Hegesippus relates these facts in the following words.

## Footnotes

* ↑ παλαιὸς κατέχει λόγος. It is noticeable that, although Eusebius has the written authority of Hegesippus for this account, he still speaks of it as supported by “ancient tradition.” This is different from his ordinary custom, and serves to make us careful in drawing conclusions as to the nature of Eusebius’ authority for any statement from the expression used in introducing it.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume I/Church History of Eusebius/Book III/Chapter 13

Chapter XIII.—Anencletus, the Second Bishop of Rome.
After Vespasian had reigned ten years Titus, his son, succeeded him. In the second year of his reign, Linus, who had been bishop of the church of Rome for twelve years, delivered his office to Anencletus. But Titus was succeeded by his brother Domitian after he had reigned two years and the same number of months.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Vespasian reigned from July 1 (if his reign be dated from the time he was proclaimed emperor in Egypt; if from the death of Vitellius, Dec. 20), 69, to June 24, 79 a.d.
* ↑ In his Chron. (Armenian) Eusebius gives the length of Linus’ episcopate as fourteen years, while Jerome gives it as eleven years. Both figures are about equally reliable; see above, chap. 2, note 1.
* ↑ Of Anencletus, or Cletus, as he is also called, we know nothing more than that he was one of the traditional first three bishops of Rome. Hippolytus makes two bishops, Anencletus and Cletus, out of the one man, and he is followed by the Roman Catholic Church (see above, chap. 2, note 1). According to chap. 15, Anencletus held office twelve years.
* ↑ Titus died Dec. 13, a.d. 81. He therefore reigned two years and six months, instead of two years and two months as Eusebius states.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume I/Church History of Eusebius/Book III/Chapter 17

Chapter XVII.—The Persecution under Domitian.
Domitian, having shown great cruelty toward many, and having unjustly put to death no small number of well-born and notable men at Rome, and having without cause exiled and confiscated the property of a great many other illustrious men, finally became a successor of Nero in his hatred and enmity toward God. He was in fact the second that stirred up a persecution against us, although his father Vespasian had undertaken nothing prejudicial to us.

## Footnotes

* ↑ The persecutions under Nero and Domitian were not undertaken by the state as such; they were simply personal matters, and established no precedent as to the conduct of the state toward Christianity. They were rather spasmodic outbursts of personal enmity, but were looked upon with great horror as the first to which the Church was subjected. There was no general persecution, which took in all parts of the empire, until the reign of Decius (249–251), but Domitian’s cruelty and ferocity were extreme, and many persons of the highest rank fell under his condemnation and suffered banishment and even death, not especially on account of Christianity, though there were Christians among them, but on account of his jealousy, and for political reasons of various sorts. That Domitian’s persecution of the Christians was not of long duration is testified by Tertullian, Apol. 5. Upon the persecutions of the Christians, see, among other works, Wieseler’s Die Christenverfolgungen der Cäsaren, hist. und chronolog. untersucht, 1878; Uhlhorn’s Der Kampf des Christenthums mit dem Heidenthum, English translation by Smyth and Ropes, 1879; and especially the keen essay of Overbeck, Gesetze der römischen Kaiser gegen die Christen, in his Studien zur Gesch. der alten Kirche, I. (1875).
* ↑ The fact that the Christians were not persecuted by Vespasian is abundantly confirmed by the absence of any tradition to the opposite effect. Compare Tertullian’s Apol. chap. 5, where the persecutions of Nero and Domitian are recorded.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume I/Church History of Eusebius/Book III/Chapter 15

Chapter XV.—Clement, the Third Bishop of Rome.
In the twelfth year of the same reign Clement succeeded Anencletus after the latter had been bishop of the church of Rome for twelve years. The apostle in his Epistle to the Philippians informs us that this Clement was his fellow-worker. His words are as follows: “With Clement and the rest of my fellow-laborers whose names are in the book of life.”

## Footnotes

* ↑ On Anencletus, see chap. 13, note 3.
* ↑ Phil. iv. 3. For an account of Clement, see above, chap. 4, note 19; and upon the order of succession of the Roman bishops, see chap. 2, note 1.
# Jones v. Georgia

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 24
Jones v. Georgia
Wilbur D. Owens, Jr., for petitioner.
Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen. of Georgia, G. Ernest Tidwell, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., and Marion O. Gordon, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jones v. Georgia/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 24
Jones v. Georgia
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.
Petitioner appealed his conviction for murder to the Georgia Supreme Court where he sought reversal on the ground, among others, that the evidence relevant to his claim of systematic exclusion of Negroes from the grand and petit juries drawn in the county established a prima facie case of the denial of equal protection within our decision in Whitus v. State of Georgia, 385 U.S. 545, 87 S.Ct. 643, 17 L.Ed.2d 599. The Georgia Supreme Court affirmed the conviction stating that Whitus was distinguishable because 'public officers are presumed to have discharged their sworn official duties. * * * Under the testimony in this case we cannot assume that the jury commissioners did not eliminate prospective jurors on the basis of their competency to serve, rather than because of racial discrimination.' 223 Ga. 157, 162, 154 S.E.2d 228, 232.
We hold that the burden upon the State to explain 'the disparity between the percentage of Negroes on the tax digest and those on the venires,' Whitus, supra, 385 U.S. at 552, 87 S.Ct. at 647, was not met by the Georgia Supreme Court's reliance on the stated presumptions. See Arnold v. North Carolina, 376 U.S. 773, 84 S.Ct. 1032, 12 L.Ed.2d 77; Eubanks v. State of Louisiana, 356 U.S. 584, 78 S.Ct. 970, 2 L.Ed.2d 991; Williams v. State of Georgia, 349 U.S. 375, 75 S.Ct. 814, 99 L.Ed. 1161; Avery v. State of Georgia, 345 U.S. 559, 73 S.Ct. 891, 97 L.Ed. 1244; Cassell v. State of Texas, 339 U.S. 282, 70 S.Ct. 629, 94 L.Ed. 839; Norris v. State of Alabama, 294 U.S. 587, 55 S.Ct. 579, 79 L.Ed. 1074. We therefore reverse the judgment of the Georgia Supreme Court and remand for further proceedings not inconsistent with our opinion.
It is so ordered.
Reversed and remanded.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jones v. Green

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
68 U.S. 330
Jones v. Green
APPEAL from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Nebraska, the case being thus:
In February, 1859, C. and J. Green and C. and I. Gill filed a bill in Chancery in the District Court of the Territory just mentioned, against one Jones and a certain Brown. It set forth that in March, 1858, the said Greens had obtained judgment in the District Court of the First Judicial District of Nebraska, against Brown, for $1155, and that in October of the same year, the other two complainants, G. and C. Gill, had obtained judgment against him in the same court for $450. It charged, that on the 15th of July, 1857, Brown was engaged in mercantile pursuits in the city of Omaha; that he was on that day utterly insolvent, and being about to suspend business and the payment of his debts, purchased certain real estate in the city just named; and in order to place it beyond the reach of his creditors, procured a conveyance to be made to the other defendant, Jones, who it was alleged now held the property upon a secret trust for him. The bill set forth also that executions had been issued and returned unsatisfied, and prayed that the premises might be sold and the proceeds applied to the payment of the judgments. The answer denied that executions had been issued and returned unsatisfied; and there was no sufficient proof that they had been.
The District Court rendered a decree in favor of the complainants, and the Supreme Court of the Territory affirmed it. On the argument of the appeal in this court,-which was by Messrs. Carlisle and Redick for the appellant, and by Mr. Woolworth contra,-several objections were made to the decree; but the only one considered by the court was, whether the bill would lie before the judgment creditors had attempted to collect their judgments by execution at law.
Mr. Justice FIELD delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jones v. Habersham

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
107 U.S. 174
Jones v. Habersham
W. W. Montgomery, for appellants.
W. S.C.hishom, A. R. Lawton, and Charles C. Jones, Jr., for appellees.
GRAY, J.
This a bill in equity, by the heirs at law, and next of kin of Miss Mary Telfair, of Savannah, against the executors of her will, and the devisees and legatees named therein, to have the devises and bequests adjudged void, and a resulting trust declared in favor of the plaintiffs. The will, which was executed the day before the testatrix died, and was afterwards admitted to probate in the court of appropriate jurisdiction of the state of Georgia, disposed of property amounting to more than $650,000, contained many devises and bequests to individuals and to charitable objects, and appointed the executors of the will trustees under its provisions. The defendants filed a general demurrer. The opinion delivered by Mr. Justice BRADLEY, in the circuit court, sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the bill, is reported in 3 Woods, 443.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jones v. Healing

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
373 U.S. 758
Jones v. Healing
Norman M. Littell and Frederick Bernays Wiener, for appellant.
John S. Boyden, Allen H. Tibbals and Bryant H. Croft, for Jones and others.
John S. Boyden, Allen H. Tibbals and Bryant H. Croft, for Healing.
Norman M. Littell and Frederick Bernays Wiener, for Jones.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lazarus (Andreyev)

English-language translations of Елеазар include:
* Lazarus, unknown translator (Thomas Seltzer?), 1907
* Lazarus, translated by Avrahm Yarmolinsky, 1918
* Lazarus, translated by Archibald J. Wolfe, 1919
# Lazarus, a tale of the world's great miracle/Chapter 45

CHAPTER XLV.
"SELL all that thou hast, take up thy cross, and follow Me," murmured Lazarus, while he bent over the dead body of the beauteous Magdalene, now lying on the very couch on which he himself had died.
She had been found close to Jerusalem, stabbed in the heart by some foul hand. None would ever know the quick, hot words, the madness-given strength of the proud woman who had stabbed her in her jealousy. None would ever know how Lazarus mourned his bride. He had sold all that he possessed; had this too been a possession that would have kept his soul back from the great work of testifying? If so, blessed be the Lord who giveth and taketh away; he, too, must tread the winepress alone.
A ship was waiting to take Lazarus and Mary away to where he could preach the gospel unmolested. Simon could not make up his mind to let both daughters leave him in his old age; so it had been decided that Martha should remain with him. The spirit of the Eternal One had shown Lazarus that he would not have been restored to life only to die again at once. The Lord had commanded him to testify. This he must needs do, and, to do so, ​he must leave Judæa; for, everywhere, a price was offered for his capture.
He had hoped to carry away with him the living Magdalene, but the Lord had willed it otherwise. Perhaps she had deserved a better fate, a rest for all her taunts and trials.
In the beautiful garden of Bethany, where the almond tree and pomegranate were now just putting forth their buds, where the feet of the Lord had so often stood, they buried her, and Martha and Mary combed with loving tenderness the tresses that had wiped the feet of Jesus. And on her bosom Lazarus placed a little cross of cedarwood, the first that had been made in record of the Christ's shameful death; the symbol that was to become the only staff of comfort in the valley of death, that dark, terror-beset ravine that must be traversed; the dark shadow thrown across eternal sunshine. And over the grave they planted the myrtle in token of love, and little cypress trees.
And then the two who had so loved the Lord left Bethany and Judæa for ever, and sailed forth to preach to other nations the great truth of salvation that had been rejected by the Jews.
THE END.
Layout 2
# Lazarus v. Phelps

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Lazarus v. Phelps."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Lazarus v. Phelps (152 U.S. 81)
* Lazarus v. Phelps (156 U.S. 202)
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume IV/Against the Heathen/Contra Gentes. (Against the Heathen.)/Part I/Chapter 13

§13. The folly of image worship and its dishonour to art.
Again, in worshipping things of wood and stone, they do not see that, while they tread under foot and burn what is in no way different, they call portions of these materials gods. And what they made use of a little while ago, they carve and worship in their folly, not seeing, nor at all considering that they are worshipping, not gods, but the carver’s art. 2. For so long as the stone is uncut and the wood unworked, they walk upon the one and make frequent use of the other for their own purposes, even for those which are less honourable. But when the artist has invested them with the proportions of his own skill, and impressed upon the material the form of man or woman, then, thanking the artist, they proceed to worship them as gods, having bought them from the carver at a price. Often, moreover, the image-maker, as though forgetting the work he has done himself, prays to his own productions, and calls gods what just before he was paring and chipping. 3. But it were better, if need to admire these things, to ascribe it to the art of the skilled workman, and not to honour productions in preference to their producer. For it is not the material that has adorned the art, but the art that has adorned and deified the material. Much juster were it, then, for them to worship the artist than his productions, both because his existence was prior to that of the gods produced by art, and because they have come into being in the form he pleased to give them. But as it is, setting justice aside, and dishonouring skill and art, they worship the products of skill and art, and when the man is dead that made them, they honour his works as immortal, whereas if they did not receive daily attention they would certainly in time come to a natural end. 4. Or how could one fail to pity them in this also, in that seeing, they worship them that cannot see, and hearing, pray to them that cannot hear, and born with life and reason, men as they are, call gods things which do not move at all, but have not even life, and, strangest of all, in that they serve as their masters beings whom they themselves keep under their own power? Nor imagine that this is a mere statement of mine, nor that I am maligning them; for the verification of all this meets the eyes, and whoever wishes to do so may see the like.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume IV/Against the Heathen/Contra Gentes. (Against the Heathen.)
## Contents

* Part I
* Part II
* Part III
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume IV/Against the Heathen/Contra Gentes. (Against the Heathen.)/Part I
## Contents

* Chapter 1
* Chapter 2
* Chapter 3
* Chapter 4
* Chapter 5
* Chapter 6
* Chapter 7
* Chapter 8
* Chapter 9
* Chapter 10
* Chapter 11
* Chapter 12
* Chapter 13
* Chapter 14
* Chapter 15
* Chapter 16
* Chapter 17
* Chapter 18
* Chapter 19
* Chapter 20
* Chapter 21
* Chapter 22
* Chapter 23
* Chapter 24
* Chapter 25
* Chapter 26
* Chapter 27
* Chapter 28
* Chapter 29
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume IV/Against the Heathen
## Contents

* Introduction
* Contra Gentes. (Against the Heathen.)
# New feet within my garden go—

* "New feet within my garden go" in Poems (1890)
* "New feet within my garden go" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# New detainee psych ward to open soon

* related portals: Guantanamo.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
http://www.jtfgtmo.southcom.mil/wire/wire/WirePDF/v6/TheWire-v6-i022-2SEPT2005.pdf

## New detainee psych ward to open soon

By Spc. Dave Lankford JTF-GTMO Public Affairs Office
In a never-ending effort to improve the quality of care offered to the detainees at GTMO, Camp Delta is preparing to open its new psychiatric ward before the end of the year in October.
Though the level of treatment the detainees receive has always been top quality, the new facility will be a more comfortable environment for the patients, as well as a more convenient location for the service members working there.
The new facility will be an extension of the detention hospital, and unlike the old ward, will be air conditioned throughout. The new ward will have 20 beds in segregated rooms, unlike the old ward, which was set up much the same as a standard block. This will enable the staff to provide care in a “conducive, therapeutic atmosphere,” said Navy Capt. Barney Barendse, Deputy Joint Task Force Surgeon.
“[The detainees] are patients and treated accordingly. We treat them the way we would treat any other psychological disorder. They get the same care [JTF Troopers] get, they just have quicker access to it because they live right there,” said Barendse.
Barendse also said the new ward will help in that it will bring both medical facilities together in the camp. At this point there is a distance between the two facilities. This takes time not only for the medical staff, but also for the guards who have to move the detainees from place to place.
“The thing about this new ward is we have the dedicated guard force there, we’re a tri-service staff running the place and the Navy is the executive agent. Combine all of this together and we have an excellent program,” said Barendse.
The new ward is in the final stage of construction, and should be fully operational in the near future. New detainee psych ward to open soon.
“We did the walk through about 10 days ago. We’re just waiting on furniture at the nurses’ station, doctors’ offices, conference room and in the actual segregated rooms. The previous ward was set-up much the same as a standard detention block. It’s built just like a prison psychiatric ward would be built...We used the American Corrections Association as our guide,” said Barendse.
If everything goes as planned, the new psych ward should be opened in early October.
# Landis v. North American Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
299 U.S. 248
Landis v. North American Company
Argued: Nov. 9, 1936. --- Decided: Dec 7, 1936
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., Stanley F. Reed, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., and Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioners.
Mr. John C. Higgins, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice CARDOZO delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Landon in The Improvisatrice; and Other Poems

This work caused quite a sensation when first published in 1824 and propelled its author to international fame. However, although one of the most original volumes to come out of the first half of the eighteenth century, that originality became somewhat overlooked by subsequent generations, perhaps influenced by the effects of Victorian propriety.
The title page should be noticed how it is so arranged as to form the figure of a woman.
Landon in The Improvisatrice; and Other Poems
The
THE IMPROVISATRICE;
and
Other Poems.
B Y
L. E. L.
* L o n d o n.
* PUBLISHED BY HURST, ROBINSON & CO 90, CHEAPSIDE,&8, PALL MALL. 1824
THE IMPROVISATRICE;
AND
OTHER POEMS.
BY L. E. L.
WITH EMBELLISHMENTS.
It lies not in our power to love or hate, For will in us is overruled by Fate. Marlowe.
LONDON:
PRINTED FOR HURST, ROBINSON AND CO. 90, CHEAPSIDE, AND 8, PALL-MALL; AND ARCHIBALD CONSTABLE AND CO. EDINBURGH.
1824.
INDEX.
LITERARY GAZETTE OR PAGE NUMBER
| THE IMPROVISATRICE | 1 |
TALES AND MISCELLANEOUS POEMS.
| ROSALIE | 109 |
| ROLAND'S TOWER | 129 |
| THE GUERILLA CHIEF | 143 |
| THE BAYADERE | 30TH AUGUST, 6/13TH SEPTEMBER, 1823 |
| ST.GEORGE'S HOSPTAL | 25TH MAY, 1822 |
| THE DESERTER | 8TH JUNE, 1822 |
| GLADESMUIR | 14TH SEPTEMBER, 1822 |
| THE MINSTREL OF PORTUGAL | 21ST SEPTEMBER, 1822 |
| THE BASQUE GIRL AND HENRI QUATRE | 12TH OCTOBER, 1822 |
| THE SAILOR | 20TH DECEMBER, 1823 |
| THE COVENANTERS | 22ND NOVEMBER, 1823 |
FRAGMENTS.
| THE SOLDIER'S FUNERAL | 16TH NOVEMBER, 1822 |
| LINES WRITTEN UNDER A PICTURE OF A GIRL BURNING A LOVE LETTER | 16TH NOVEMBER, 1822 ​ |
| ARION, A TALE | 23RD NOVEMBER, 1822 |
| MANMADIN, THE INDIAN CUPID, FLOATING DOWN THE GANGES | 14TH DECEMBER, 1822 |
| THE FEMALE CONVICT | 21ST DECEMBER, 1822 |
| THE PAINTER'S LOVE | 7th DECEMBER 1822 |
| INEZ | 24TH MAY, 1823 |
| THE OAK | 19TH APRIL, 1823 |
| THE VIOLET | 284 |
| CHANGE | 23RD AUGUST, 1823 |
| THE GREY CROSS | 289 |
| CRESCENTIUS | 19TH JULY. 1823 |
| ON A STAR | 295 |
| HOME | 297 |
| THE EMERALD RING, A SUPERSTITION | 28TH DECEMBER, 1822 |
| LOVE | 302 |
| LOVE, HOPE AND BEAUTY | 304 |
| THE CRUSADER | 15TH FEBRUARY, 1823 |
| THE WARRIOR, A SKETCH | 25THOCTOBER, 1823 |
| APOLOGUE | 11TH AUGUST, 1821 |
BALLADS
| THE SOLDIER'S GRAVE | 15TH FEBRUARY, 1823 |
| SONG OF THE HUNTER'S BRIDE | 15TH FEBRUARY, 1823 |
| WHEN SHOULD LOVER'S BREATHE THEIR VOWS? | 24TH NOVEMBER, 1821 |
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Landholding in England/Front matter

LANDHOLDING IN ENGLAND
BY THE SAME AUTHOR
THE CORN LAWS
A POPULAR HISTORY
168 Pages. Large Crown 8vo. 1/- nett Cloth Gilt, 2/-
London: A. C. FIFIELD, 44 Fleet Street, E.C.