OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# He and I

"He and I,—and that was all"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1898), "He and I" in Poems.
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "He and I" in Poems II.
# Helvering v. City Bank Farmers Trust Company

United States Supreme Court
296 U.S. 85
Helvering v. City Bank Farmers Trust Company
Argued: Oct. 15, 1935. --- Decided: Nov 11, 1935
The Attorney General and Mr. David E. Hudson, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Russell L. Bradford, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Coleman-Gilbert Associates

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
296 U.S. 369
Helvering v. Coleman-Gilbert Associates
Argued: Nov. 21, 1935. --- Decided: Dec 16, 1935
The Attorney General and James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Mr. Ralph E. Tibbetts, of Boston, Mass., for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Clifford

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
309 U.S. 331
Helvering v. Clifford
Argued: Feb. 5, 1940. --- Decided: Feb 26, 1940
Robert H. Jackson, Atty. Gen., and Warner W. Gardner, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Thomas P. Helmey, of Minneapolis, Minn., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Chicago Stock Yards Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
318 U.S. 693
Helvering v. Chicago Stock Yards Company
Argued: March 9, 10, 1943. --- Decided: April 12, 1943
Mr. Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Mr. George Wharton Pepper, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Combs

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
296 U.S. 365
Helvering v. Combs
Argued: Nov. 22, 1935. --- Decided: Dec 16, 1935
The Attorney General and James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Mr. Dana Latham, of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# I worked for chaff and earning Wheat

I worked for chaff and earning Wheat Was haughty and betrayed. What right had Fields to arbitrate In matters ratified?
I tasted Wheat and hated Chaff And thanked the ample friend — Wisdom is more becoming viewed At distance than at hand.
# Iamblichus on the Mysteries of the Egyptians, Chaldeans, and Assyrians (Second Edition 1895)

Iamblichus on the Mysteries.
IAMBLICHUS
ON
The Mysteries
OF THE
EGYPTIANS, CHALDEANS, AND ASSYRIANS.
TRANSLATED FROM THE GREEK
BY
THOMAS TAYLOR.
Ο δε Αρισοτελης προς Αντιπατρον περι Αλεξανδρου γραφων, εφη μη μονον εκεινῳ προσηκειν οτι πολλων κρατει μεγαφρονειν, αλλ' ουδεν ηττον ει τις ορθως γινωσκει περι θεων.
Plutarch.
Second Edition.
LONDON: BERTRAM DOBELL, 77 CHARING CROSS ROAD, W.C. AND REEVES AND TURNER, 5 WELLINGTON STREET, STRAND. MDCCCXCV.
The various translations and original works of Thomas Taylor, though still in request by the more zealous students of ancient philosophy and occult science, have now become so scarce and expensive that it is only within the power of comparatively wealthy collectors to obtain them. This is a matter for regret, inasmuch as it cannot be affirmed that his writings have been, or are likely to be superseded, or that they are without value. They can hardly be neglected without loss by those who desire to understand the systems of philosophy which satisfied the spiritual needs of the antique world. It is not possible, even for the most fervent believer in modern "progress," to dismiss the speculations of the ancient philosophers as antiquated notions which have had their day and no longer possess interest or value. The names of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle can never grow dim with age, nor is it possible to conceive a time when men shall cease to study and reverence them. As the disciple, the translator, and the expounder of ​these and of other sages of antiquity, Thomas Taylor deserves to be held in honour and remembrance, and it would be a misfortune if his labours remained unknown because of the scarcity of his books. It is for this reason that the present reprint has been undertaken; and it is hoped that it will meet with such a measure of success as may encourage the republication of various other works by the same author. It has been printed in handsome style and published at a moderate price in order that it may be regarded as a desirable addition to the scholar's library, while yet it will not tax severely the means of the not too wealthy student. For the rest it is only necessary to say that this reprint is, in size, number of pages, type, and general get-up, an almost exact facsimile of the original edition, which was first printed in 1821. No alterations or additions have been made in or to the original text, as it is thought that those who care for Taylor's writings will prefer to have them in their integrity. Should it be found possible, however, to continue the series it is intended to prefix to a future volume an essay on Taylor, which will contain a biography of him, and a critical estimate of his writings.
* Introduction
* The Epistle of Porphyry to the Egyptian Anebo.
* Iamblichus on the Mysteries of the Egyptians, Chaldeans, and Assyrians:
** Section 1
** Section 2
** Section 3
** Section 4
** Section 5
** Section 6
** Section 7
** Section 8
** Section 9
** Section 10
* Additional Notes
* end matter
# Iacurci v. Lummus Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
387 U.S. 86
Iacurci v. Lummus Company
Argued: May 15, 1967. ---
Arnold B. Elkind, for petitioner.
Raymond L. Falls, Jr., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Iamblichus

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Iamblichus."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
# I wish I was in Dixie's Land

The first authorized edition of Dixie's Land, published in New York in 1860 as "I wish I was in Dixie's Land", was most the popular version.
    I wish I was in de land ob cotton,
    Old times dar am not forgotten;
    Look away! Look away! Look away! Dixie Land.
    In Dixie Land whar I was born in,
    Early on one frosty mornin,
    Look away! Look away! Look away! Dixie Land.
    (Chorus)
    Den I wish I was in Dixie, Hooray! Hooray!
    In Dixie Land, I'll took my stand,
    To lib an die in Dixie,
    Away, Away, Away down south in Dixie,
    Away, Away, Away down south in Dixie.
    Old Missus marry "Will-de-weaber,"
    Willium was a gay deceaber;
    Look away! Look away! Look away! Dixie Land.
    But when he put his arm around'er,
    He smilled as fierce as a forty-pound'er,
    Look away! Look away! Look away! Dixie Land.
    (Chorus)
    His face was sharp as a butchers cleaber,
    But dat did not seem to greab'er;
    Look away! Look away! Look away! Dixie Land.
    Old Missus acted de foolish part,
    And died for a man dat broke her heart.
    Look away! Look away! Look away! Dixie Land.
    (Chorus)
    Now here's a health to the next old Missus,
    And all de galls dat want to kiss us;
    Look away! Look away! Look away! Dixie Land.
    But if you want to drive 'way sorrow,
    Come an hear dis song to-morrow.
    Look away! Look away! Look away! Dixie Land.
    (Chorus)
    Dar's buck-wheat cakes an 'Ingen' batter,
    Makes you fat or a little fatter;
    Look away! Look away! Look away! Dixie Land.
    Den hoe it down an scratch your grabble,
    To Dixie land I'm bound to trabble.
    Look away! Look away! Look away! Dixie Land.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Iacurci v. Lummus Company/Dissent Harlan

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Harlan
United States Supreme Court
387 U.S. 86
Iacurci v. Lummus Company
Argued: May 15, 1967. ---
Mr. Justice HARLAN (dissenting).
In Neely v. Eby Construction Co., 386 U.S. 317, 87 S.Ct. 1072, 18 L.Ed.2d 75, we held that a court of appeals might, despite denial by the trial judge of motions for a new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, appropriately instruct the district court to enter judgment against the jury-verdict winner. We also recognized in Neely, however, that there might be situations in which the necessity for a new trial would be better determined by the trial court, and that in such situations the court of appeals should return the case to the district court for such an assessment.
In joining Neely, I did not understand the opinion to require this Court to interpose in each case its own judgment of the relative competence of the court of appeals and of the district court to pass on the new trial motion. Rather, I understood Neely to place upon the cur t of appeals the responsibility for determining 'in its informed discretion,' supra, at 329, at 1080 of 87 S.Ct., which, if any, of the issues urged in support of a new trial 'should be reserved for the trial court.' Ibid. I think that sound judicial administration demands that this Court should overturn a considered judgment of a court of appeals on such issues only in situations of manifest abuse of discretion.
The Court in this instance states that it does 'not share the Court of Appeals' confidence as to the meaning, in light of the trial court's instructions, of the jury's failure to answer' subquestions included in the interrogatories. The ambiguities upon which the Court now relies were earnestly urged by petitioner in her petition for rehearing to the Court of Appeals. Petition for Rehearing 5-6, 7-8. They were, as the Court in Neely intended, before the Court of Appeals for its judgment whether the case should be returned to the District Court for determination of the necessity for a new trial. Had I been sitting on the Court of Appeals I might not have agreed with the view taken of this case by the majority there, but I cannot agree that their conclusion was a manifest abuse of their 'informed discretion.' I hope that this decision does not indicate that the Court is about to embark on a course comparable to that it set for itself in FELA cases.
I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Illinois Pneumatig Gas Company v. Berry

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
113 U.S. 322
Illinois Pneumatig Gas Company v. Berry
W. H. Smith and C. W. Holcomb, for appellant.
Erwin Palmer, for appellees.
FIELD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Illinois Surety Company v. United States ex rel Peeler

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
240 U.S. 214
Illinois Surety Company v. United States ex rel Peeler
Argued: January 14, 1916. --- Decided: February 21, 1916
Mr. Bynum E. Hinton for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Benjamin E. Pierce, D. W. Robinson, and John L. Rendleman for defendants in error.
Messrs. George P. Miller, Edwin S. Mack, and Arthur W. Fairchild, as amici curiae.
Mr. Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Illinois Steel Company v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
320 U.S. 508
Illinois Steel Company v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company
Argued: Dec. 16, 1943. --- Decided: Jan 3, 1944
Mr. Paul R. Conaghan, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.
Mr. Francis R. Cross, of Baltimore, Md., for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Illinois Surety Company v. John Davis Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
244 U.S. 376
Illinois Surety Company v. John Davis Company
Argued: April 27, 1917. --- Decided: June 4, 1917
[Syllabus from 376-377 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Albert J. Hopkins for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Worth Allen, William D. McKenzie, Newton Wyeth, Robert J. Cary, F. Harold Schmitt, and Charles S. Holt for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice Brandeis delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hudibras/Preface

PREFACE.
The edition of Hudibras now submitted to the public is intended to be more complete, though in a smaller compass, than any of its numerous predecessors. The text is that of Nash, usually accepted as the best; but in many instances—as in the very first line—the author's original readings have been preferred. In all cases the variations are shown in the foot notes, so that the reader may take his choice.
The main feature, however, of the present edition is its notes; these have been selected with considerable diligence and attention from every known source, and it is believed that no part of the text is left unexplained which was ever explained before. Grey has been the great storehouse of information, and next in degree Nash, but both have required careful sifting. Other editions, numerous as they are,—including Aikin's, the Aldine, and Gilfillan's,—have yielded nothing. Mr Bell's, which is by far the best, is edited on the same principle as the present, and had that gentleman retained the numbering of the lines, and given an Index, there would have been little left for any successor to improve.
A few of the notes in the present selection are, to a certain extent, original, arising from some historical and bibliographical knowledge of the times, or derived ​from a manuscript key, annexed to a copy of the first edition, and attributed to Butler himself.
The Biographical Sketch of our poet is a mere rifacimento of old materials, for nothing new is now to be discovered about him. Diligent researches have been made in the parish where he lived and died—Covent Garden—without eliciting any new fact, excepting that the monument erected to his memory has been destroyed.
This volume has been more than two years at press having dribbled through the editor's hands, not during his leisure hours or intervals of business, for he never had any, but by forced snatches from his legitimate pursuits. An old affection for Hudibras, acquired nearly half a century ago, at a time when its piquant couplets were still familiarly quoted, had long impressed him with the desire to publish a really popular edition;
the public therefore now have the result.
It has happened, from the want of consecutive attention, that two or three notes are all but duplicate such as that on Wicked Bibles at pages 326 and 371 Mum and Mummery, 385 and 406; and, He that fights and runs away, at pages 403 and 106. But the publisher hopes that his readers will not quarrel with him for giving too much rather than too little.
Henry G. Bohn.
    York Street, Covent Garden,
       April 28th, 1859.
# Immigration and the Commissioners of Emigration of the state of New York/Appendix/5

V. An Act
FOR THE MORE EFFECTUAL PROTECTION OF EMIGRANTS ARRIVING AT THE PORT OF NEW YORK.
Chapter 857.
[Passed June 5, 1868, three-fifths being present.]
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Sec. 1. Each Commissioner of Emigration shall have power to administer an oath to, and examine under oath, any witness respecting any complaint made by any person relative to the ship in which any passenger was brought to the United States, or the treatment of any passenger during the voyage, or the food or drink furnished to any passenger on the voyage, or the death on the voyage of any passenger; but to entitle the same to be read upon the trial of any person accused of any crime or offence, such examination shall be made in the presence of the person complained of, who shall have a right to cross-examine every such witness.
Sec. 2. Such Commissioner shall cause such testimony to be reduced to writing before him, and shall sign and certify the same, and shall deliver such depositions, so signed and certified, to the Clerk of the County of New York, who shall file the same of record in his office, and shall enter a docket or minute of such filing, on payment of a fee of one dollar.
Sec. 3. The said clerk shall deliver a certified copy of such deposition to any person applying for the same, upon payment of a fee of twenty-five cents for such certificate, and of five cents for every folio of one hundred words therein contained.
Sec. 4. Such deposition and certified copies thereof shall be evidence in any action then or thereafter pending, between any of the passengers on such voyages, and the said ship, or her owners, master or charterers, victualling, manning, and navigating her for such voyage, upon any claim involving the facts therein testified to.
Sec. 5. Before taking such testimony, such Commissioners shall cause at least six hours written notice thereof to the said vessel, her owners, master, or charterers, to be served on the owners personally, or on the master personally, or by handing a true copy thereof to the person found in charge of such vessel. The said notice, with an affidavit of service, which may be made before such Commissioner, shall be attached to the deposition; but such notice need not name the owner, master, or charterer, and such owner, master, or charterer, or their agent, may cross-examine said witness; but no examination shall be adjourned for more than twenty-four hours, unless by reason of sickness of such witness.
# Immigration and the Commissioners of Emigration of the state of New York/Appendix/7

VII. Statistical Tables.
* Table 1
* Table 2
* Table 3
* Table 4
* Table 5
* Table 6
* Table 7
* Table 8
* Table 9
* Table 10
* Table 11
# Immigration and the Commissioners of Emigration of the state of New York/Appendix

APPENDIX.
APPENDIX.
# In London, September, 1802

O FRIEND! I know not which way I must look For comfort, being, as I am, opprest, To think that now our life is only drest For show; mean handy-work of craftsman, cook, Or groom!--We must run glittering like a brook In the open sunshine, or we are unblest: The wealthiest man among us is the best: No grandeur now in nature or in book Delights us. Rapine, avarice, expense, This is idolatry; and these we adore: Plain living and high thinking are no more: The homely beauty of the good old cause Is gone; our peace, our fearful innocence, And pure religion breathing household laws.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In Loneliness

"They are at rest"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1912), "In Loneliness—Iseult of Brittany" in The Unconquered Air, and Other Poems (1912).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "In Loneliness" in Poems II.
# In Korea with Marquis Ito

IN KOREA
WITH
MARQUIS ITO
Part I
A NARRATIVE OF PERSONAL EXPERIENCES
Part II
A CRITICAL AND HISTORICAL INQUIRY
by
GEORGE TRUMBULL LADD, LL.D.
CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS
NEW YORK :: :: :: :: :: :: 1908
Copyright, 1908, by Charles Scribner's Sons, for the United States of America
Printed by the Scribner Press
New York, U. S. A.
TO THE
DEAR COMPANION
OF ITS EXPERIENCES AND THE
READY SCRIBE OF MUCH OF ITS MANUSCRIPT
THIS BOOK IS GRATEFULLY
AND AFFECTIONATELY
DEDICATED
CONTENTS
​$_{CHAPTER}$$_{PAGE}$
CONTENTS OF PART I
CONTENTS OF PART II
# In Just-

First published in The Dial, vol. LXVIII, no. 5 (May 1920). New York: The Dial Publishing Company, Inc.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse