OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Handbook of the Swatow Vernacular/Garden
## lesson XV. garden.
### 花園

    Hue-hn̂g
       A flower garden.

### 草埔

    Tshaú-pou
       A lawn. ​

### 花

    Hue
       Plants or flowers.

### 蕊

    Lúi
       A bud.

### 月記

    Guéh-kì
       Rose.

### 香葉

    Phang-hiéh
       Geranium or scented leaves.

### 茉莉

    Bák-lĩ
       Jasmine.

### 菊花

    Kek-hue
       Chrysanthemum.

### 茶花

    Tê-hue
       Camellia.

### 蓮花

    Nôiⁿ-hue
       Lotus.

### ⿱艹麾

    Moⁿ
       Ferns.

### 莿

    Chhì
       Thorns.

### 草

    Tsháu
       Grass.

### 松樹

    Sêng-chhiū
       Banian.

### 樹枝

    Chhiū-ki
       A branch.

### 園離

    Hn̂g-lî
       Hedge.

### 地界

    Tī-kài
       Boundary.

### 鋤頭

    Tṳ̂-thâu
       A hoe.

### 糞耙

    Pùn-pê
       A garden-rake.

### 糞箕

    Pùn-ki
       Baskets for removing rubbish.

### 塗糞

    Tôu-pùn
       Refuse.

### 滑

    Kút
       To hoe. ​

### 種

    Chèng
       To plant.

### 扭

    Liú
       To dig.

### 白發

    Péh-huat
       Weeds.

### 欉

    Tsâng
       A classifier of a tree.

### 摘

    Tiah
       To pluck.

### 沃花個人在何處

    Ak-hue--kâi-nâng tõ tî-ko?
       Where is the gardener?

### 呌伊速速來沃花

    Hàm i méⁿ-méⁿ lâi ak-hue
       Tell him to look sharp and come and water the plants.

### 花俱皆饒饒

    Hue lóng-tsóng jiôu-jîou
       The plants are all dried up.

### 好多日無沃

    Hoh-tsōi jít bô-ak
       They have not been watered for several days.

### 有個要死了

    Ũ-kâi àiⁿ-sí--lō
       Some of them are withering.

### 此欉死了。扭丢

    Chí--tsâng sí lō, liú-tiòu
       This one is withered, dig it out.

### 在彼有䓶。着去掘丢

    Tõ-hié ũ chhì, tiéh khṳ̀ kút-tiòu
       There are thorns there, you must go and hoe them away.

### 掘了携糞箕携丢

    Kút-lióu khiéh pùn-ki put-tiòu
       After hoing them get baskets and remove them.

### 此欉花何人種個

    Chí-tsâng hue tî-tiâng chèng--kâi?
       Who has planted this plant here?

### 是我種個

    Sĩ uá chèng--kâi.
       I planted it.

### 彼欉是白發個

    Hṳ́--tsâng sĩ péh-huat--kâi
       That one is a weed.

### 白發個勿。挽丢

    Péh-huat--kâi màiⁿ, mán-tiòu
       I don't want any weeds, pull it up. ​

### 草埔俱皆是樹葉

    Tsháu-pou lóng-tsóng sĩ chhiū-hiéh
       Leaves are all over the lawn.

### 携糞耙去耙清潔

    Khiéh pùn-pê khṳ̀ pê chheng-khih
       Get the garden-rake and rake it clean.

### 茶花有開花或未

    Tê-hue ũ khui-hue a-būe?
       Have the camellias begun to blossom?

### 未。有蕊而已

    Būe, ũ lúi tiāⁿ-tiāⁿ
       No, there are only buds.

### 若是開伊個花是雅在

    Nāⁿ-sĩ khui i kâi hue sĩ ngiá-tsãi
       If the flowers blow they will be very pretty.

### 每明早要食着摘花擺放床頂

    Pâi-mêng-khí àiⁿ-chiáh tiéh tiah-hue pái pàng tshn̂g-téng
       Every morning at breakfast you must pluck some flowers and place them on the table.
# Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar/56. Quadriliterals

Layout 2
On the origin of these altogether secondary formations cf. § 30 p. While quadriliteral nouns are tolerably numerous, only the following examples of the verb occur: ​(a) On the analogy of Piʿēl: כִּרְסֵם imperfect, יְכַרְסְמֶ֫נָּה, ψ 80 from כָּסַם, cf. גָּזַם. Passive רֻֽטֲפַשׁ, Jb 33. Participle מְכֻרְבָּל (cf. Aramaic כְּבַל), 1 Ch 15. It is usual also to include among the quadriliterals פַּרְשֵׁז Jb 26, as a perfect of Aramaic form with Pathaḥ not attenuated. It is more correctly, however, regarded, with Delitzsch, as the infinitive absolute of a Piʿlel formation, from פָּרַשׂ, with euphonic change of the first שׂ to שׁ, and the second to ז. Moreover, the reading פַּרְשֵׂז also is very well attested, and is adopted by Baer in the text of Job; cf. the Rem. on p. 48 of his edition.
(b) On the analogy of Hiphʿîl: הִשְׂמְאִיל, by syncope הִשְׂמִאיל and הִשְׂמִיל to turn to the left (denom. from שְׂמֹאל) Gn 13, Is 30, &c. On הֶֽאֶזְנִ֫יחוּ cf. § 53 p.
# Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar/57. Strong Verb with Pronominal Suffixes

Layout 2
C. Strong Verb with Pronominal Suffixes.
The accusative of the personal pronoun, depending on an active verb, may be expressed (1) by a separate word, אֵת the accusative sign (before a suffix אֶת, אֹת) with the pronominal suffix, e.g. קָטַל אֹתוֹ he has killed him; or (2) by a mere suffix, קְטָלָ֫הוּ or קְטָלוֹ he has killed him. The latter is the usual method (§ 33), and we are here concerned with it alone. Neither of these methods, however, is employed when the accusative of the pronoun is reflexive. In that case a reflexive verb is used, viz. Niphʿal or Hithpaʿēl (§§ 51 and 54), e.g. הִתְקַדֵּשׁ he sanctified himself, not קִדְּשׁוֹ, which could only mean he sanctified him.
Two points must be specially considered here: the form of the suffix itself (§ 58), and the form which the verb takes when suffixes are added to it (§§ 59–61).
* ↑ This subject of the verbal suffixes is treated here in connexion with the strong verb, in order that both the forms of the suffixes and the general laws which regulate their union with verbal forms may be clearly seen. The rules which relate to the union of the suffixes with weak verbs will be given under the several classes of those verbs.
* ↑ An accusative suffix occurs with Niphʿal in ψ 109 (since נִלְחַם is used in the sense of to attack), and according to some, in Is 44; with Hithpaʿēl Is 14 (הִתְנַחֵל to appropriate somebody to oneself as a possession); cf. above, § 54 f, and § 117 w.
* ↑ On the cases where אֵת is necessary, see § 117 e.
* ↑ The exceptions in Jer 7, Ez 34 are only apparent. In all these instances the sharp antithesis between אֹתָם (themselves) and another object could only be expressed by retaining the same verb; also in Ex 5 אֹתָם after an active verb serves to emphasize the idea of themselves.
# Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar/62. Verbs with Gutturals

Layout 2
Brockelmann, Grundriss, p. 584 ff.
Verbs which have a guttural for one of the three radicals differ in their inflexion from the ordinary strong verb, according to the general rules in § 22. These differences do not affect the consonantal part of the stem, and it is, therefore, more correct to regard the guttural verbs as a subdivision of the strong verb. At the most, only the entire omission of the strengthening in some of the verbs middle guttural (as well as in the imperfect Niphʿal of verbs first guttural) can be regarded as a real weakness (§§ 63 h, 64 e). On the other hand, some original elements have been preserved in guttural stems, which have degenerated in the ordinary strong verb; e.g. the ă of the initial syllable in the imperfect Qal, as in יַחְמֹד, which elsewhere is attenuated to ĭ, יִקְטֹל.—In guttural verbs א and ה are only taken into consideration when they are actual consonants, and not vowel-letters like the א in some verbs פ״א (§ 68), in a few ע״א (§ 73 g), and in most ל״א (§ 74). In all these cases, however, the א was at least originally a full consonant, while the ה in verbs ל״ה was never anything but a vowel letter, cf. § 75. The really consonantal ה at the end of the word is marked by Mappîq.—Verbs containing a ר also, according to § 22 q, r, share some of the peculiarities of the guttural verbs. For more convenient treatment, the cases will be distinguished, according as the guttural is the first, second, or third radical. (Cf. the Paradigms D, E, F, in which only those conjugations are omitted which are wholly regular.)
# Herman v. Phalen

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
55 U.S. 79
Herman v. Phalen
THESE two cases were brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana, and were argued together by Mr. Allen and Mr. Ovid F. Johnson for the defendant in error. No counsel appeared for the plaintiff in error.
The points in the case were argued in the case of League v. De Young, 11 Howard, 188, to which the reporter refers.
Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hermione

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Hermione."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Hermione, a poem by Ralph Waldo Emerson
* Hermione (and Her Little Group of Serious Thinkers), a book by Marquis
# Hermione (Emerson)

On a mound an Arab lay
* Hermione in Poems (1847)
* Hermione in Poems (Household Edition, 1904)
# Herman v. Phalen/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
55 U.S. 79
Herman v. Phalen
These two cases have been argued together and depend upon the same principles. They were decided in the Circuit Court, before the opinion of this court was pronounced in the case of League v. De Young and Brown, reported in 11 Howard, 185. In that case, all of the questions which arise in the cases before us were fully considered and decided; and that decision is adverse to the doctrines now contended for by the defendant in error. Upon reviewing the opinion in League v. De Young and Brown, we see no reason for changing it in any respect; and these two cases must therefore be reversed, and a mandate issued to the Circuit Court, directing the judgment in each of them to be reversed, and the judgment entered for the plaintiff in error.
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Circuit Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, reversed, with costs, and that this cause be, and the same is hereby, remanded to the said Circuit Court, with directions to enter judgment for David B. Herman, the plaintiff in error.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hermeneutics

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Hermeneutics."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Hermeneutics," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Hermeneutics," in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
# Hermes

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Hermes."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Hermes" in the Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology (1870)
* "Hermes" in the Encyclopædia Britannica, 11th ed. (1911), Vol. 13
* Hermes, or, A Philosophical Inquiry Concerning Language and Universal Grammar (1751), by James Harris
* Hermes (1866–Present), a journal for Greco-Roman studies

## See also

* "St. Hermes," in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
* "Ode to Hermes" in Hesiod, the Homeric Hymns and Homerica
* "Phoebus and Hermes", a poem by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
* Mercury, the Roman equivalent
# Hamilton v. California

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Fortas
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 921
Hamilton v. California
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, and Edsel W. Haws and Daniel J. Kremer, Deputy Attys. Gen., for respondent.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hamilton v. Alabama (376 U.S. 650)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Black
United States Supreme Court
376 U.S. 650
Hamilton v. Alabama
PER CRIAM.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is reversed. Johnson v. Virginia, 373 U.S. 61, 83 S.Ct. 1053, 10 L.Ed.2d 195.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hamilton v. California/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Fortas
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 921
Hamilton v. California
Denied.
Mr. Justice FORTAS, with whom Mr. Justice DOUGLAS and Mr. Justice MARSHALL join, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hamilton v. Alabama (376 U.S. 650)/Concurrence Black

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Black
United States Supreme Court
376 U.S. 650
Hamilton v. Alabama
Mr. Justice BLACK concurs in rever al of the judgment of contempt for reasons discussed in In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, 75 S.Ct. 623, 99 L.Ed. 942; In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682, and Thompson v. City of Louisville, 362 U.S. 199, 80 S.Ct. 624, 4 L.Ed.2d 654. Cf. Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 75 S.Ct. 11, 99 L.Ed. 11.
Mr. Justice CLARK, Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice WHITE are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hamilton v. Dillin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
88 U.S. 73
Hamilton v. Dillin

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Glitter (A. L. Burt Company)

Glitter
By Katharine Brush
A. L. BURT COMPANY
Publishers New York
Published by arrangement with Minton, Balch & Company Printed in U. S. A.
FOR MY MOTHER AND FATHER
CONTENTS
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1952, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 71 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Glitter

* Glitter (1925), the original serialized version in College Humor magazine
* Glitter (1926), the original novelized version
* Glitter, a reprint by A. L. Burt Company, specific date unknown

## Film adaptations

* The Drop Kick (1927), directed by Millard Webb
# Hays v. Gauley Mountain Coal Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
247 U.S. 189
Hays v. Gauley Mountain Coal Company
Argued: March 4, 5, and 6, 1918. --- Decided: May 20, 1918
Mr. Solicitor General Davis, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Mr. Henry B. Closson, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice PITNEY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hays v. Pacific Mail Steam-Ship Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
58 U.S. 596
Hays v. Pacific Mail Steam-Ship Company
THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the district court of the United States for the northern district of California.
The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
It was argued by Mr. Brent and Mr. May, for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. Davidge and Mr. Vinton, for the defendants.
Mr. Justice NELSON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hays v. Port of Seattle

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
251 U.S. 233
Hays v. Port of Seattle
Argued: Nov. 12, 1919. --- Decided: Jan 5, 1920
Mr. William F. Hays, of Seattle, Wash., pro se.
Messrs. L. T. Turner, C. E. Claypool, and Harold Preston, all of Seattle, Wash., for appellees.
Mr. Justice PITNEY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gnerich v. Rutter

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 388
Gnerich v. Rutter
Argued: March 10, 1924. --- Decided: June 2, 1924
Messrs. H. G. McKannay and Louis V. Crowley, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.
Mrs. Mabel W. Willebrandt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Go Big Red

Go Big Red is the fight song of Lamar University. It was written by Dr. Ted Skinner, dean of fine arts in 1962. The fight song was composed in 1962. The music for the song was composed by Dr. Charles A. Wiley director of bands at Lamar University the same year.
Fight! Lamar U. Cardinals,
For alma mater fight.
Glory in the triumph
for the red and the white.
Faithful to our colors
we will ever be, fighting ever fighting for Lamar U. victory.
B-I-G (pause for one beat) R-E-D,> Big Red, Big Red, Big Red, Let’s Go Big Red.
Repeat first two sections once more.

## References

* ↑ http://www.lamarcardinals.com/trads/song.html
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works published in 1962 could have had their copyright renewed in 1989 or 1990, i.e. between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st, 1991.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Go-Bart Importing Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
282 U.S. 344
Go-Bart Importing Company v. United States
Argued: Nov. 25, 1930. --- Decided: Jan 5, 1931
[Syllabus from pages 344-346 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Edward F. Colladay, of Washington, D. C. (Messrs. Benjamin B. Pettus and Joseph C. McGarraghy, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for petitioners.
The Attorney General and Mr. Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from page 347 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Go Not Too Far

"Go not too far—too far beyond my gaze"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1903), "Go Not Too Far" in The Atlantic Monthly (December 1903).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1904), "Go Not Too Far" in Mine and Thine (1904).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "Go Not Too Far" in Poems I.

## References

* ↑ View this version at Google Books.
# Hartzel v. United States/Separate Roberts

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Reed
* Separate Opinion Roberts
United States Supreme Court
322 U.S. 680
HARTZEL v. UNITED STATES.
No. 531. Argued: April 25, 1944. --- Decided: June 12, 1944.
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS.
Without discussing the evidence in detail or characterizing the petitioner's conduct, I deem it sufficient to say that I concur in the view that there was not sufficient evidence in the case to warrant submission to the jury. The conviction of violation of the statute should, therefore, be reversed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Harvard Law Review/Volume 1/Issue 1

Layout 4
HARVARD
LAW REVIEW.
Vol. I.APRIL 15, 1887.No. 1. :
| J. B. Ames, Purchase for Value Without Notice | 1 |
| Joseph H. Beale, Jr., Tickets | 17 |
| Notes | 35 |
| The Law School | 38 |
| Correspondence | 43 |
| Recent Cases | 47 |
| Reviews | 50 |
# Harvard

Read after Holmes received an honorary degree (Doctor of Laws) at a Commencement Dinner, July 1, 1880.
Changeless in beauty, rose-hues on her cheek, Old walls, old trees, old memories all around Lend her unfading youth their charm antique And fill with mystic light her holy ground. Here the lost dove her leaf of promise found While the new morning showed its blushing streak Far o'er the waters she had crossed to seek The bleak, wild shore in billowy forests drowned. Mother of scholars! on thy rising throne Thine elder sisters look benignant down; England's proud twins, and they whose cloisters own The fame of Abelard, the scarlet gown That laughing Rabelais wore, not yet outgrown— And on thy forehead place the New World's crown.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Harvard Law Review/Volume 1

Volume 1 of the Harvard Law Review was published in eight issues between April 15, 1887 and March 15, 1888.
HARVARD
LAW REVIEW
Vol. I
1887–88
CAMBRIDGE, MASS.
Published by the Harvard Law Review Publishing Association
# Hieroglyphics

Hieroglyphics
By Arthur Machen Author of "The Great God Pan," etc.
London Grant Richards 1902
* Note
* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
* Appendix
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1947, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 76 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse