OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Anderson, Major-General Louis Edward

​ANDERSON, Major-General Louis Edward, C.B. (1913), L.R.C.P.I., L.M., and L.R.C.S.I.; entered Royal Army Medical Corps, 1884; became Major, 1896, Lieut.-Col., 1900: Col., 1908; and Surg.-Gen. and Major-Gen., 1912; retired 1920; served with Nile and Suakin Expeditions 1884-5 (medal with two clasps, bronze star): N.W. Frontier of India, 1897-8 (medal with clasp); S. Africa, 1899-1902, as Special Service Officer, and Principal Medical Officer, present at Defence of Mafeking and operations in Transvaal and Cape Colonies (Queen's medal with two clasps, King's medal with two clasps, promoted): was Assistant Director Medical Services; Allahabad and Fyzabad Brigades, 1908-11; Bareilly, Garhwal, and Dehra Dun Brigs., 1911-12; appointed Dep. Director of Medical Services (Lucknow Division), 1912, and Irish Command, 1913; eldest son of late Louis John Anderson, D.I., R.I.C.; b. 1861; m. 1888, Emily, only dau. of the late Henry Fisher, of Liverpool. Junior Army and Navy Club, London.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Anderson, Alexander

​ANDERSON, Alexander, M.A., LL.D., D.Sc.; President of, since 1899, and Professor of Natural Philosophy in, since 1885, Queen's, now University, College, Galway; b. 12th May, 1858; son of Daniel Anderson, Camus, Coleraine; m. Emily, dau. of Wm. J. Binns, National Bank, Galway. Educ.; Queen's College, Galway; Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge. First Science Scholar and first Peel Prizeman in geometry, Queen's College, Galway, 1876; second Peel Exhibitioner at first University Examination in Arts, 1879, and prizeman as the best answerer in mathematics; Gold Medal at B.A. Examination, 1880, and at M.A. Examination, 1881; open scholarship, Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge, 1881 (first place); Goldsmith's Exhibitioner, 1882; Sixth Wrangler, 1884; Fellowship in Royal University of Ireland, 1886; Fellowship in Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge, 1891; Hon. LL.D., Glasgow University, 1901; Senator of Royal University of Ireland; Senator of National University of Ireland; Member of Dublin Commission (Irish Universities Act, 1908): Vice-chancellor of National University of Ireland, 1915. Pubns.; several papers in Messenger of Mathematics, Philosophical Magazine, Proceedings of Physical Society of London, and Proceedings of Cambridge Philosophical Society. Recns.: various, including cycling, croquet, modern languages, and mountain climbing. Address: University College, Galway. Clubs: County Galway, Galway; University, Dublin.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Anderson, Lieut.-Col. Henry Stewart

​ANDERSON, Lieut.-Col. Henry Stewart, C.M.G. (1918); son of Rev. Samuel Anderson, of Dunmurry, Ireland; b. 1872; is Lieut.-Col. R.A.M.C.; served during S. African War, 1899-1902 (Queen's medal with four clasps. King's medal with two clasps); m. 1910 Cicely Mary, dau. of the Rev. Otho Steele, of Lichfield, Staffordshire. Res.: Dunmurry, Co. Antrim.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Algie, Allan John James

​ALGIE, Allan John James. Educ.: Oakbrook School, Derby; Dublin University (B.A.); J.P., Co. Galway, 1890. Co. Mayo, 1890; Land Agent, de Clifford Estates, 1892-1915; Area Organiser Irish Recruiting Council, 1918; R.A.S.C. (Forage Department), 1918-1919; b. 1866; m. 1891, Beatrice Maria, youngest dau. of the late John Young Ruttledge, F.T.C.D. Recns.; Hunting, shooting, fishing, cricket, lawn tennis. Res.: Togher House, Hollymount, Co. Mayo.
# Town of Coloma v. Eaves/Concurrence Bradley

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Bradley
United States Supreme Court
92 U.S. 484
Town of Coloma v. Eaves
MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY delivered the following concurring opinion:--
I dissent from the opinion of the court in this case, so far as it may be construed to reaffirm the first point asserted in the case of Knox County v. Aspinwall; to wit, that the mere execution of a bond by officers charged with the duty of ascertaining whether a condition precedent has been performed is conclusive proof of its performance. If, when the law requires a vote of tax-payers, before bonds can be issued, the supervisor of a township, or the judge of probate of a county, or other officer or magistrate, is the officer designated to ascertain whether such vote has been given, and is also the proper officer to execute, and who does execute, the bonds, and if the bonds themselves contain a statement or recital that such vote has been given, then the bona fide purchaser of the bonds need go back no farther. He has a right to rely on the statement as a determination of the question. But a mere execution and issue of the bonds without such recital is not, in my judgment, conclusive. It may be prima facie sufficient; but the contrary may be shown. This seems to me to be the true distinction to be taken on this subject; and I do not think that the contrary has ever been decided by this court. There have been various dicta to the contrary; but the cases, when carefully examined, will be found to have had all the prerequisites necessary to sustain the bonds, according to my view of the case. This view was distinctly announced by this court in the case of Lynde v. The County of Winnebago, 16 Wall. 13. In the case now under consideration, there is a sufficient recital in the bond to show that the proper election was held and the proper vote given; and the bond was executed by the officers whose duty it was to ascertain these facts. On this ground, and this alone, I concur in the judgment of the court.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tower v. Water Hammer Arrester Corporation/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
330 U.S. 853
Tower v. Water Hammer Arrester Corporation
The petition for rehearing is denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Town of Coloma v. Eaves

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Bradley
United States Supreme Court
92 U.S. 484
Town of Coloma v. Eaves
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
Assumpsit brought by the plaintiff below to recover the amount due on the coupons attached to certain bonds, purporting to have been issued by the town of Coloma, through its proper officers, to the Chicago and Rock River Railroad Company, in payment of a subscription of $50,000 by the town to said company. The form of the bond is as follows:--
'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
[$1,000.
'COUNTY OF WHITESIDE,
'State of Illinois, Town of Coloma:--
'Know all men by these presents, That the township of Coloma, in the county of Whiteside, and State of Illinois, acknowledges itself to own and be indebted to the Chicago and Rock River Railroad Company, or bearer, in the sum of $1,000, lawful money of the United States; which sum the said town of Coloma promises to pay to the Chicago and Rock River Railroad Company, or the bearer hereof, on the first day of July, 1881, at the office of the treasurer of the county of Whiteside aforesaid, in the State of Illinois, on the presentation of this bond, with interest thereon from the first day of January, 1872, at the rate of ten per centum per annum, payable annually at the office of the treasurer of the county of Whiteside aforesaid, on the presentation and surrender or the annexed coupons.
'[U.S. $5 revenue-stamp.]
'This bond is issued under and by virtue of a law of the State of Illinois entitled 'An Act to incorporate the Chicago and Rock River Railroad Company,' approved March 24, 1869, and in accordance with a vote of the electors of said township of Coloma, at a regular election held July 28, 1869, in accordance with said law, and under a law of the State of Illinois entitled 'An Act to fund and provide for the paying of the railroad debts of counties, townships, cities, and towns,' in force April 16, 1869; and, when this bond is registered in the State auditor's office of the State of Illinois, the principal and interest will be paid by the State treasurer, as provided by said last-mentioned law.
'In witness whereof, the supervisor and town-clerk of said town have hereunto set their hands and seals this first day of January, A.D. 1872.
'(Signed) M. R. ADAMS, Supervisor. [SEAL.]
'(Signed) J. D. DAVIS, Town-Clerk. [SEAL.]'
Recovery was resisted by the town, mainly upon the alleged ground of a want of power in the officers of the town to issue the bonds, because the legal voters of the town had not been notified to vote upon the question of the town's making the subscription in question.
On the trial of the case, judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for the amount of the coupons, and interest after they were due.
Mr. C. M. Osborn for plaintiff.
Mr. J. Grant, contra.
MR. JUSTICE STRONG delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tower v. Water Hammer Arrester Corporation

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
330 U.S. 853
Tower v. Water Hammer Arrester Corporation
Mr. Harold Olsen, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.
Messrs. Bertram Wm. Coltman, Ralph E. Brown and Sidney Neuman, of Chicago, Ill., for respondent.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tower v. Fletcher/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
114 U.S. 127
Tower v. Fletcher
These motions are made on the ground that the judgments for the review of which the writs of error were sued out are not final judgments. The judgment in each case is that the judgment of the state district court 'be, and the same is hereby, reversed, with costs, with directions to the superior court of Los Angeles county to enter judgment upon the findings for the plaintiff as prayed for in his complaint.' That judgment is final for the purposes of a writ of error to this court, which terminates the litigation between the parties on the merits of the case, so that, if there should be an affirmance here, the court below would have nothing to do but to execute the judgment it had already rendered. Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff, 106 U.S. 3; S.C.. 1 SUP. CT. REP. 15, and the numerous cases there cited. The judgments in these cases are of that character. The litigation is ended, and the rights of the parties on the merits have been fully determined. Nothing remains to be done but to require the inferior court to perform the ministerial act of entering the judgments in that court which have been ordered. This is but carrying the judgment of the supreme court which has been rendered into execution. Nothing is left to the judicial discretion of the court below. The cases relied on in support of the motions to dismiss were all judgments or decrees of reversal, with leave for further proceedings in the inferior court. Such judgments are not final, because something yet remains to be done to complete the litigation. The motion, in each of the cases, is overruled.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# The Zoo Revisited

Extracted from the English Illustrated magazine (London) serial: V 11, Dec 1893 - Aug 1894, pp. 297-300, etc. Accompanying illustrations by Cecil Aldin, and photographs, may be omitted. The Zoo Revisited is a collection of short stories (the first six) and chatty, informative articles—much like BBC's wildlife series—of some of the animals in the London Zoo then.
THE ZOO REVISITED.
By PHIL ROBINSON.
* I.—A Chat with the Queen's Lion (short story)
* II.—A Chat with the Sacred Ibis (short story)
* III. A Chat with the American Bison (short story)
* IV.—A Chat with Roaring Alligators (short story)
* V.—A Chat with a Common Monkey (short story)
* VI.—A Chat with Jingo (short story)
* VII.—The Small Cats' House (article)
* VIII.—An Evening Stroll (article)
* IX.—The Clever Boy at the Zoo (article)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Gas Pipe Line Company v. Federal Power Commission

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
385 U.S. 83
United Gas Pipe Line Company v. Federal Power Commission
Argued: Oct. 19 and 20, 1966. --- Decided: Nov 14, 1966
Vernon W. Woods, Shereveport, La., for petitioner.
Peter Schiff, Washington, D.C., and Bruce R. Merrill, Houston, Tex., for respondents.
Mr. Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Gas Improvement Company v. Callery Properties, Inc. (380 U.S. 931)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
380 U.S. 931
United Gas Improvement Company v. Callery Properties, Inc.
Solicitor General Cox, Frank Goodman, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock and Josephine H. Klein for the Federal Power Commission, petitioner in No. 756.
Solicitor General Cox, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock and Josephine H. Klein, for the Federal Power Commission, respondent in No. 714.
Richard F. Generelly, for Callery Properties, Inc.
Robert W. Henderson, Thomas G. Crouch and Paul W. Hicks, for Sands and others.
Herbert W. Verner, Murray Christian and Roland B. Voight, for Superior Oil Co.
Chauncey P. Williams, Jr., Edward S. Kirby, James R. Lacey, Edwin F. Russell, Harry G. Hill, Jr., and Barbara M. Suchow, for Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. and others, as amici curiae.
March 8, 1965.
The motion of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Incorporated, et al., for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, in No. 671, is granted. Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted. Cases consolidated and a total of four hours allotted for oral argument.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Gas Improvement Company v. Callery Properties, Inc. (382 U.S. 223)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
382 U.S. 223
United Gas Improvement Company v. Callery Properties, Inc.
Argued: Oct. 18, 19, 1965. --- Decided: Dec 7, 1965
See 382 U.S. 1001, 86 S.Ct. 526.
[Syllabus from pages 223-224 intentionally omitted]
Richard A. Solomon, Washington, D.C., for Federal Power commission.
William T. Coleman, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., for United Gas Improvement Co. and others.
Kent H. Brown, Albany, N.Y., for Public Service Comm'n of New York.
J. Evans Attwell, Houston, Tex., for Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co.
Herbert W. Varner, Houston, Tex., for Superior Oil Co. and others.
Richard F. Generelly, Washington, D.C., for Callery Properties, Inc. and others.
Paul W. Hicks, Dallas, Tex., for Placid Oil Co. and others.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Gas Improvement Company v. Continental Oil Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
381 U.S. 392
United Gas Improvement Company v. Continental Oil Company
Argued: April 28, 1965. --- Decided: June 1, 1965
[Syllabus from pages 392-394 intentionally omitted]
Sol. Gen. Archibald Cox and William T. Coleman, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioners.
David T. Searls, Houston, Tex., for respondents.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Gas Improvement Company v. Continental Oil Company/Dissent Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Douglas
United States Supreme Court
381 U.S. 392
United Gas Improvement Company v. Continental Oil Company
Argued: April 28, 1965. --- Decided: June 1, 1965
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, dissenting.
While I dissented in Federal Power Comm. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., 337 U.S. 498, 69 S.Ct. 1251, 93 L.Ed. 1499, it is not conceivable to me that the majority that made up the Court in that case would adhere to what is done today. That would be irrelevant if we dealt with a constitutional matter, as issues of that magnitude are always open for re-examination. But since we deal with the vagaries of a statute with no constitutional overtones, I think the matter should be left where Panhandle Eastern Peipe Line left it, saving for the Congress, of course, the power to expand the regime of the federal bureaucracy if it desires. It is sometimes customary for a court to distinguish precedents to the vanishing point, creating an illusion of certainty in the law while leaving only a shadow of an ancient landmark. That is within the judicial competence and has been done before. But where the issue has been so hotly contested as it was in Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line and when the Court has been so explicit in bringing traffic in gas leases under the 'production or gathering of natural gas' which Congress left to the States, I would adhere to that result until Congress changes it.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Gas Improvement Company v. Callery Properties, Inc.

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United Gas Improvement Company v. Callery Properties, Inc.."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United Gas Improvement Company v. Callery Properties, Inc. (380 U.S. 931)
* United Gas Improvement Company v. Callery Properties, Inc. (382 U.S. 223)
# United Gas Improvement Company v. Callery Properties, Inc. (380 U.S. 931)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
380 U.S. 931
United Gas Improvement Company v. Callery Properties, Inc.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF the STATE OF NEW
YORK, petitioner,
v. CALLERY PROPERTIES, INC., et al.
No. 678.
OCEAN DRILLING & EXPLORATION COMPANY, petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION et al.
No. 714. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, petitioner,
v. CALLERY PROPERTIES, Inc., et al.
No. 756. Supreme Court of the United States
March 8, 1965
William T. Coleman, Jr., Samuel Graff Miller, Richardson Dilworth, Harold E. Kohn, Bertram D. Moll and Vincent P. McDevitt, for United Gas Improvement Co. and others.
Kent H. Brown and Morton L. Simons, for Public Service Commission of New York.
J. Evans Attwell, J. A. O'Connor, Jr., and H. Y. Rowe, for Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Davin, William

​DAVIN, William (M.P. for Leix and Offaly from 1922); b. February, 1890, in parish of Rathdowney, Queen's County. Educ. in Rathdowney National School, St. Kiernan's College, Kilkenny, and Hughes' Academy, Stephen's Green, Dublin; entered clerical staff of London and North Western Railway at North Wall, April, 1907; promoted Assistant Stationmaster Dun Laoghaire Pier, November, 1920. Representative of Irish Railway Agents, Stationmasters, and Clerks on Executive Committee of Railway Clerks Association for three years, also occupied position of Council Secretary, Branch Secretary, Dublin Branch Chairman, and various other Offices in R.C.A. from 1909; elected with highest average vote (15,167) of any member of the Dail at June, 1922, Elections.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Dargan, William J.

​DARGAN, William J., M.D. (R.U.I.); F.R.C.P.I.; Physician to St. Vincent's Hospital, Dublin; son of James Dargan, C.E., and Teresa Johnson; m. 1903, Tessie Ronayne; issue, five sons, one dau. Educ.: St. Vincent's College, Castleknock. Pubns.: Secretary Diseases of the Stomach (Med. Press and Circ). Recn.: golf. Res.: 47 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin. Club: Stephen's Green.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Davey, Rev. Professor J. Ernest

​DAVEY, Rev. Professor J. Ernest, M.A. (Cantab.), B.D. (Edinburgh). Educ.: Campbell College, Belfast. First Scholar in Classics (R.U.I.), 1908; Minor Scholar, King's College, Cambridge, 1909-1911. Foundation Scholar, 1911-1916; elected Fellow, 1916. 1st class Classical Tripos, Part I., Cambridge University, 1912; 1st Class Theological Tripos, Part II., 1913, Edinburgh University, B.D. 1917. Appointed Professor of Church History, Assembly's College, Belfast, 1917, and Professor of Biblical Literature and Hellenistic Greek, 1922, after union of the Presbyterian Faculties in Belfast and Derry; b. 24th June, 1890; son of Rev. Charles Davey, D.D., of Fisherwick Church, Belfast, Pubns.: The Church and the Gospel; Renunciation and Consecration—the two ways, 1918; Charles Davey, D.D., a memoir, 1921; Our faith in God through Jesus Christ, 1922. Recns.: golfing, fencing, music. Res.: College Park, Belfast.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Dane, Sir Louis William

​DANE, Sir Louis William, G.C.I.E. (1911), K.C.I.E. (1905), C.S.I. (1904); Sirdar-i-, Afghanistan, 1905; Knight of Grace Order of St. John of Jerusalem, 1915; entered I.C.S. 1876; was Private Secretary to Lieut.-Gov. of Punjab, 1879-82; Settlement Collector, 1887: Dep. Commr. and Settlement Collector, 1892-6; Chief Secretary to Government of Punjab, 1896-1900; Resident Magistrate in Ireland, 1900-1901; and Resident in Kashmir, 1901-2: carried out Land Revenue Settlements, Gurdapur District, 1887-92; and at Peshawar, 1892-6; was chief of the Mission to Kabul, 1904-05, and concluded the treaty there with the Amir, 21st March, 1905; Secretary to Government of India, Foreign Dept., 1903-08; Lieut.-Governor of the Punjab, 1908-13; b. 1856; fifth son of late Richard Martin Dane, C.B., I.G. of Hospitals, of Killyhevlin, Co. Fermanagh; m. 1882, Edith (Lady of Grace Order of St. John of Jerusalem, 1918; Gold Medal of the Kaiseri-Hind, 1913; Medaille de la Reine Elizabeth avec Croix Rouge, 1919); dau. of late Lieut.-Gen. Sir Francis Booth Norman, K.C.B. Res.: The King's House, Lyndhurst, Hants. British Empire Club.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Daunt, Achilles Thomas

​DAUNT, Achilles Thomas, J.P., Co. Cork; only son of late Wm. J, O'Neill Daunt, of Kilcascan Castle, Co. Cork, M.P. Mallow, 1832-3: b. 1849; m. 1877, Anna, dau. of late B. Corballis, of Berwick. Res.: Kilcascan Castle, Ballyneen, Co. Cork.