OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Modern Czech Poetry/Spake my heart…

[44] [45]
2. ŘEKLO MÉ SRDCE . . .
Reklo mé srdce vůli mojí: Proč mučíš mne v stálém nepokoji? Proč lámeš můj růst? Proč trháš můj list? Proč v koruně ničíš píseň hnízd?
2. SPAKE MY HEART . . .
Spake my heart unto my will: Why rackest thou me, that I ne'er am still? Why snappest my growth? And my leafage wrest? Why marrest the song in each topmost nest?
[46] [47]
Chci sladký vzduch jarní v závrati jmout, chci větve své k letu rozepnout, chci vonět, chci vábit, chci šumět, chci kvést, chci zlato slunce, chci stříbro hvězd.
Rekla má vůle srdci mému: Dobře se děje zhýčkanému! Léta jsi těkalo ze slasti v slast; mne nebýt, neznáš trpět ni vlást.
Jsme zrozeni k činům, či zrozeni k snům? Jsme voda a pára, či blesk a chlum? Já paní, ty rab jsi, já ruka, ty věc, mý rozkazům klaň se, jak větru svit svěc.
„Všemu na vzdory“ (1916).
I desire to clutch dizzily sweet breath of spring, I desire unto summer my branches to fling, I desire to be fragrant, to lure, rustle, flower, I desire a sun-gold, a star-silver dower,
Spake my will unto my heart: It betides thee well, pampered thing that thou art! Yearlong from bliss to bliss didst thou stray; But for me, thou wouldst know nor sorrow, nor sway.
Are we born for struggle, or born for dream? Are we water and vapour, or hill-top and gleam? I am mistress, thou'rt slave, hand am I, thing art thou, At my bidding, as taper in tempest, to bow.
“In spite of all” (1916).
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1970, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 53 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Modern Czech Poetry/The first concert

[30] [31]
ANTONÍN SOVA.
1. PRVNÍ KONCERT.
Již vystoup' v černém šatě bledý a slech' jak hovor pod ním stichal, vzduch parfumy a horkem dýchal, sál světly hořel tmavohnědý. —
A dole před ním jako v pýří v hedvábí, krajkách, musselinu, půl ve světle a zpola v stínu, dam řad se v polokruhu šíří.
Vlas tmavý, zlatý, vše to splývá; ty žhavé oči, rudé rety! Hle černých fraků silhouetty hle, lorgnetů skla žádostivá!
Vznes' housle a již tóny spijí vzduch stišený svou hloubkou plnou, v klavíru akkord měkkou vlnou vpad' jásavě a s energií. —
Však mistr jeho, kdysi slavný se rozechvěn kams v chodby ztratil, jej pocit strachu náhle schvátil, vzpomínal na svůj debut dávný.
Ctěl uniknouti kritik hlasu, i potlesku i hanobení, i závisti, jež zub svůj cení, a chce-li, do prachu rve krásu.
ANTONÍN SOVA.
1. THE FIRST CONCERT.
Pallid, in black array he strode And marked the hush beneath his feet, The air breathed perfume out and heat, The hall with russet lustre glowed. —
Gossamer-like before him shed. In muslin, silk and lace arrayed, Half in the light and half in shade, Ladies in semi-circle spread.
Billows of dark and golden hair; These scarlet lips, these eyes on fire! See, silhouettes of black attire, See, the lorgnettes with gloating stare!
His violin with dazing spell Grips the hushed air in deep refrains, From the piano gentle strains In waves of joy and potence fell. —
His master, whose renown is o'er Astray within some passage quakes, In sudden dread within him wakes His debut in the days of yore.
Critics to shun was his desire, Their infamy and their applause, Their hatred with its gaping jaws, Whose will drags beauty in the mire.
[32] [33]
A zas jej v sál to pudí, žene; jak třesou se ty ruce svadlé! — Zda při tom někdo na zapadlé se jméno jeho rozpomene?
„Realistické sloky“ (1890).
Constrained afresh, he seeks the hall; His shrivelled fingers, how they quiver! — Perchance that someone will deliver His name this evening from its fall?
“Realistic Strophes” (1890).
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1970, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 53 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Modern Czech Poetry/The brotherhood of the believers

[12] [13]
4.BRATRSTVÍ VĚŘÍCÍCH.
Myšlenky naše koupaly se v ohnivých vlnách svatého léta, jež rozpaluje blankyty duší žárem všech srpnů a zráním všech hvězd. A když smyly svá bolestná znamení země, povstaly v čistotě prvotních světel, a poznaly silné rozkoše času: dech jeho byl sladký nadějí mrtvých a tajemnou vichřicí vřelo v něm rašení pupenců všech budoucích zahrad.
Dni, které neměly jiter, z dálky nám hodily světla jak echa staleté touhy, šílili jsme šílenstvím lásky, jež byla modlitbou k Nejvyššímu. Ze rtů našich sladkost její se tryskla a přece hořely posvátnou žízní. Zraky naše ji pily z bratrských zraků a pohledům bratří jí dávaly píti a v rozechvění neznámé blízkosti krví nám zvonila hudbami tajemství.
4. THE BROTHERHOOD OF THE BELIEVERS.
[14] [15]
Sny naše se spojily v jediné snění a šuměly tisíci stromů jednoho hvozdu, když třesením větší podávají si poselství jednoho větru z neznámých moří. Na našich loukách ležela vůně všech květů, sladěné v jeden složitý akkord, a světla našich duší, nalitá v jidiný plápol, oděla barvami neviditelné a hlasem všech našich spojených vůlí nám v zázračné zahrady rozkvetly síly.
I trhali jsme svá opojení, jak zrna na jediném, mystickém hroznu, jež dotknutím pukala výtryskem jednoho vína: jablka jednoho stromu, jež rozříznuta společnou, naší krví se zardí, polibky jediné noci, v nichž duše zpívají o smrti a budoucích žitích, v jediném rozplání retů, na věky nemocných rozkoší jednoho blesku.
„Větry od Pólů“ (1897).
“Polar Winds” (1897).
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1970, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 53 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Modern Czech Poetry/The hazel path

[62] [63]
8. CESTA OREŠÍM.
Tak úzká byla, že dva motýli jen těsně letět mohli vedle sebe, že paprsky jen po ní tančily, hlemýžď, jda přes ni, přepažil ji celou. Sem tam se kmital modrý kousek nebe; my spolu šli tou její klenbou ztmělou, a zázrak: ač to přece pravda jistá, vždy oba na ní dost jsme měli místa.
„Poutí k Eldoradu“ (1882).
8. THE HAZEL PATH.
It was so narrow, that two butterflies Upon it, side by side, could scarcely flit. And sunbeams darted there in stealthy wise:
The snail that crawled there filled its whole extent. A morsel of blue sky shone over it We 'neath its darkened vault together went. And wonderful! Yet sooth it is to say, We two found room enough upon the way.
“On the Pilgrimage to Eldorado” (1882).
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1970, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 53 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri ex rel. St. Louis Railway Company v. Taylor

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
266 U.S. 200
Missouri ex rel. St. Louis Railway Company v. Taylor
Argued: Oct. 17, 1924. --- Decided: Nov 17, 1924
Messrs. M. U. Hayden, Edward J. White, and James F. Green, all of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 201-202 intentionally omitted]
Mr. J. L. London, of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsels from pages 203-205 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri ex rel. Woods v. Sevier

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
296 U.S. 626
Missouri ex rel. Woods v. Sevier
Mr. George A. Edwards, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri ex rel. Washington University v. Public Service Commission of Missouri/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
275 U.S. 537
STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, plaintiff in error, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI and Union Electric Light & Power Company; STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, plaintiff in error,
The writs of error are dismissed on the authority of Section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937 (28 USCA § 344; Comp. St. § 1214)), for lack of jurisdiction. Treating the writs of error as applications for certiorari, the applications are denied for want of a substantial Federal question on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U.S. 561, 569, 32 S.C.t. 704, 56 L. Ed. 1205; Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712, 720, 34 S.C.t. 892, 58 L. Ed. 1557; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S. 144, 147, 36 S.C.t. 97, 60 L. Ed. 186.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri ex rel. Woods v. Sevier/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
296 U.S. 626
Missouri ex rel. Woods v. Sevier
No opinion filed in court below.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri v. Chicago, Burlington, & Quincy Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
241 U.S. 533
Missouri v. Chicago, Burlington, & Quincy Railroad Company
Argued: May 3 and 4, 1916. --- Decided: June 12, 1916
Mr. John T. Barker, Attorney General of Missouri, and Messrs. Lee B. Ewing, W. T. Rutherford, and Kenneth C. Sears for complainant.
Messrs. O. M. Spencer, Frank Hagerman, and Chester M. Dawes for defendant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 534-535 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. F. W. Paschal, Clifford B. Allen, W. T. Alden, Ernest E. Watson, and Herbert A. Abernethy as amici curioe.
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri ex rel. Wabash Railway Company v. Public Service Commission of Missouri

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
273 U.S. 126
Missouri ex rel. Wabash Railway Company v. Public Service Commission of Missouri
Argued: Dec. 10, 1926. --- Decided: Jan 10, 1927
Messrs. Homer Hall, of St. Louis, Mo., Frederic D. McKenney, of Washington, D. C., and Nat. S. Brown, of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff in error Wabash Ry. Co.
Messrs. Marcus L. Bell, of New York City, W. F. Dickinson, of Chicago, Ill., and Luther Burns, of Topeka, Kan., for plaintiff in error Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
Messrs. Julius T. Muench, City Counselor, and Oliver Senti, Asst. City Counselor, both of St. Louis, Mo., for defendants in error mayor and city of St. Louis, Mo.
Mr. Marion Early, of St. Louis, Mo., for defendants in error Frank H. Gerhart and others.
Mr. David W. Peters, of Jefferson City, Mo., for Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen.
Messrs. Marion C. Early, of St. Louis, Mo., L. H. Breuer, of Rolla, Mo., Oliver Senti, of St. Louis, Mo., and John E. Benton, of Washington, D. C., for Public Service Commission of Missouri.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri ex rel. Washington University v. Public Service Commission of Missouri

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
275 U.S. 537
STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, plaintiff in error, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MISSOURI and Union Electric Light & Power Company; STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, plaintiff in error,
and
Messrs. Charles Nagel, Charles M. Polk and Marion C. Early, all of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. J. P. Painter, of Jefferson City, Mo., for defendant in error Public Service Commission of Missouri.
Mr. Theodore Rassieur, of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant in error Union Electric Light & Power Co.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Morris v. McMillin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
112 U.S. 244
Morris v. McMillin
Rowland Cox, for appellant.
W. Bakewell and Geo. H. Christy, for appellees.
WOODS, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Morris v. Jones

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
329 U.S. 545
Morris v. Jones
Argued: Dec. 9, 10, 1946. --- Decided: Jan 20, 1947
See 330 U.S. 854, 67 S.Ct. 858.
Messrs. Ford W. Thompson and J. L. London, both of St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.
Mr. Ferre C. Watkins, of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Morris v. McComb

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Murphy
United States Supreme Court
332 U.S. 422
Morris v. McComb
Argued: Oct. 13, 1947. --- Decided: Nov 17, 1947
Mr. George S. Dixon, of Detroit, Mich., for petitioner.
Mr. Harold Nystrom, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice BURTON, delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# My Dream (Coates)

"Though full of care"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1902), as "The Dream Beautiful" in The Smart Set (November 1902).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1904), "My Dream" in Mine and Thine (1904).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "My Dream" in Poems II.

## References

* ↑ View this version at Google Books.
# My Father's Chair

First published in A School History of England (1911) by Kipling and C. R. L. Fletcher.
* "My Father’s Chair" in A School History of England (1911)
* "My Father's Chair" in Rudyard Kipling's Verse, Inclusive Edition, 1885-1918 (1919)
# My Experiences in Parma with a Theodolite and a "Dumpy"

Serialized article, as published in Once a Week.
* Part 1
* Part 2
# Montaigne's Essays/Book I/Chapter XXVI

It is not peradventure without reason, that we ascribe the facilitie of beleeving and easines of perswasion us to simplicitie and ignorance: For me seemeth to have learnt heretofore, that beliefe was, as it were an impression conceived in our minde, and according as the same was found either more soft, or of lesse resistance, it was easier to imprint anything therein. Ut necesse est lancem in libra ponderibus impositis deprimi: sic animum perspicuis cedereAcad. Qu. iv.). 'As it is necessarie a scale must go down the ballance when weights are put into it, so must a minde yeeld to things that are manifest.' (Cic. Forasmuch, therefore, as the minde being most emptie and without counterpoize, so much the more easily doth it yeeld under the burden of the first perswasion. And that's the reason why children, those of the common sort, women, and sickefolks, are so subject to be mis-led, and so easie to swallow gudgeons. On the other side it is a sottish presumption to disdaine and condemne that for false, which unto us seemeth to beare no show of likelihood or truth which is an ordinarie fault in those who perswade themselves to be of more sufficiency than the vulgar sort. So was I sometimes wont to doe, and if I heard any body speake, either of ghosts walking, of foretelling future things, of enchantments, of witchcrafts, or any other thing reported, which I could not well conceive, or that was beyond my reach.
si nunc primum mortalibus adsint
Ex improviso, ceu sint objecta repente, Nil magis his rebus paterat mirabile dici, Aut minus ante quod auderent fore credere gentes. -- 1042.
If now first on a sudden they were here Mongst mortall men, object to eie or eare, Nothing than these things would more wondrous bee, Or that, men durst lesse thinke, ever to see.
# Montaigne's Essays/Book I/Chapter XXVIII

Madame, I present you with nothing that is mine, either because it is already yours, or because I finde nothing therein worthy of you. But wheresoever these verses shall be seene, for the honour which thereby shall redound to them, by having this glorious Corisanda of Andoins for their guide, I thought it good to adorne them with your worthy name. I have deemed this present fit for your Ladiship, forsomuch as there are few Ladies in France, that either can better judge of Poesie, or fitter apply the use of it, than your worthy selfe: and since in these her drooping daies, none can give it more life, or vigorous spirit, than you, by those rich and high-tuned accords, wherewith amongst a million of other rare beauties Nature hath richly graced you. Madame, these verses deserve to be cherished by you: and I am perswaded you will be of mine opinion; which is that none have come out of Gaskonie, that either had more wit or better invention and that witnesse to have proceeded from a richer veine. And let no jealousie possesse you, inasmuch as you have but the remainder of that which whilome I caused to be printed under the name of my Lord of Foix, your worthy, noble and deare kinsman: For truly, these have a kinde of livelinesse, and more piercing Emphasis than any other, and which I cannot well expresse: as hee that made them in his Aprile youth, and when he was enflamed with a noble glorious flame, as I will one day tell your honour in your eare. The other were afterward made by him in favour of his wife, at what time he wooed and solicited her for marriage, and began to feele I wot not what martiall chilnesse and husbands coldnesse. And I am one of those whose opinion is, that divine Poesie doth no where fadge so well, and so effectually applaudeth, as in a youthfull, wanton, and unbridled subject. The above mentioned nine and twentie Sonnets of Boetie, and that in the former impressions of this booke were here set downe, have since beene printed with his other works.
# New Orleans v. United States (131 U.S. 220)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
131 U.S. 220
New Orleans v. United States
BRADLEY, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# New Orleans v. United States (30 U.S. 449)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
30 U.S. 449
New Orleans v. United States

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# New Orleans v. Warner

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "New Orleans v. Warner."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* New Orleans v. Warner (175 U.S. 120)
* New Orleans v. Warner (176 U.S. 92)
* New Orleans v. Warner (180 U.S. 199)
See also Warner v. New Orleans.
# New Orleans v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "New Orleans v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* New Orleans v. United States (30 U.S. 449)
* New Orleans v. United States (35 U.S. 662)
* New Orleans v. United States (131 U.S. 220)
See also United States v. New Orleans.
# New Orleans v. United States (131 U.S. 220)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
131 U.S. 220
New Orleans v. United States
The decision just made in the case of City of New Orleans v. Myra Clark Gaines, ante, 745, renders it necessary that the judgment or decree in this case should be reversed, and it is reversed accordingly, and the cause remanded, with instructions to dismiss the petition.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume II/City of God/Book VIII/Chapter 7

Chapter 7.—How Much the Platonists are to Be Held as Excelling Other Philosophers in Logic, i.e. Rational Philosophy.
Then, again, as far as regards the doctrine which treats of that which they call logic, that is, rational philosophy, far be it from us to compare them with those who attributed to the bodily senses the faculty of discriminating truth, and thought, that all we learn is to be measured by their untrustworthy and fallacious rules. Such were the Epicureans, and all of the same school. Such also were the Stoics, who ascribed to the bodily senses that expertness in disputation which they so ardently love, called by them dialectic, asserting that from the senses the mind conceives the notions (ἒννοιαι) of those things which they explicate by definition. And hence is developed the whole plan and connection of their learning and teaching. I often wonder, with respect to this, how they can say that none are beautiful but the wise; for by what bodily sense have they perceived that beauty, by what eyes of the flesh have they seen wisdom’s comeliness of form? Those, however, whom we justly rank before all others, have distinguished those things which are conceived by the mind from those which are perceived by the senses, neither taking away from the senses anything to which they are competent, nor attributing to them anything beyond their competency. And the light of our understandings, by which all things are learned by us, they have affirmed to be that selfsame God by whom all things were made.