OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Constable/List of Plates

LIST OF PLATES :
| Plate | I. | On Barnes Common. From the painting in the National Gallery. |
| Plate„ | II. | A Bridge on the Stour. From the water-colour in South Kensington Museum. |
| Plate„ | III. | A View in Borrowdale. From the water-colour in South Kensington Museum. |
| Plate„ | IV. | Sunset. From a painting in the possession of the Author. |
| Plate„ | V. | Dawn. From a painting in the possession of G. A. Phillips, Esq. |
| Plate„ | VI. | The Porch of East Bergholt Church. From the painting in South Kensington Museum. |
| Plate„ | VII. | Trees and Cottages. From the painting in South Kensington Museum. |
| Plate„ | VIII. | A Cart and Horses. From the sketch in South Kensington Museum. |
| Plate„ | IX. | A Cornfield. From the sketch in the National Gallery. |
| Plate„ | X. | Study of the Stem of an Elm Tree. From the painting in South Kensington Museum. |
| Plate„ | XI. | The West End of Bergholt Church. From the painting in South Kensington Museum. |
| Plate„ | XII. | On the Stour near Dedham. From the painting in South Kensington Museum. |
| Plate„ | XIII. | Old Sarum. From the mezzotint by David Lucas. |
| Plate„ | XIV. | Salisbury Cathedral. From the painting in South Kensington Museum. |
| Plate„ | XV. | Brighton Beach, with Colliers. From the painting in South Kensington Museum. ​ |
| Plate„ | XVI. | The Leaping Horse (Sketch). From the painting in South Kensington Museum. |
| Plate„ | XVII. | Landscape with Cottage. From the painting in South Kensington Museum. |
| Plate„ | XVIII. | "The Grove," Hampstead. From the painting in South Kensington Museum. |
| Plate„ | XIX. | The Cornfield. From the painting in the National Gallery. |
| Plate„ | XX. | Study for "The Valley Farm." From the painting in South Kensington Museum. |
| Plate„ | XXI. | Study of Tree Stems. From the painting in South Kensington Museum. |
| Plate„ | XXII. | Salisbury Cathedral from the Meadows. From the mezzotint by David Lucas. |
| Plate„ | XXIII. | A Mill near Brighton. From the painting in South Kensington Museum. |
| Plate„ | XXIV. | The Cenotaph. From the painting in the National Gallery. |
# Constable/Preface

PREFACE
Leslie's admirable biography must always remain the great authority on Constable's personal history, yet no book, however accurate and sympathetic, which dates from the forties, could foresee the enormous change which has taken place in landscape painting since Constable's death. Whatever his responsibility for the artistic revolution with which his name is associated, Constable undoubtedly stands at the parting of the ways between the old masters and the moderns, for he was the first to prove that a landscape might be a good picture, and also be really like nature. The aim of his great predecessors had been to make noble compositions, with just as much resemblance to nature as was convenient. The aim of his successors has been to get a sincere likeness to nature, while pictorial quality seems too often to be regarded as a subordinate matter.
Since the excellence of Leslie's work renders any lengthy detailed biography unnecessary, the main facts of Constable's life are here dealt with in a short introduction, while the chief part of this little book has been devoted to supplementing Leslie on the technical side by tracing Constable's connection with his predecessors, by describing the development of his painting, and by giving a brief account of the evolution of Modern Landscape in England and on the Continent.
I have to thank Mr. G. A. Phillips for kindly allowing me to reproduce the charming picture in his possession, and Mr. Augustin Rischgitz, whose beautiful photographs, specially made for this work from a series of Constable's sketches at South Kensington, form the greater part of the illustrations.
Chelsea, January 1901.
# Constable/Plates

I. Barnes Common (Oil Painting: in the National Gallery).
II. A Bridge on the Stour (Water Colour: at South Kensington).
III. A View in Borrowdale (Water Colour: at South Kensington).
IV. Sunset (Oil Painting: in the possession of the Author).
V. Dawn (Oil Painting: in the possession of G. A. Phillips, Esq.).
VI. The Porch at East Bergholt Church (Oil Painting: at South Kensington).
VII. Trees and Cottages (Oil Painting: at South Kensington).
VIII. A Cart and Horses (A Sketch in Oils: at South Kensington).
IX. A Cornfield (A Sketch in Oils: in the National Gallery).
X. Study of the Stem of an Elm-Tree (Oil Painting: at South Kensington).
XI. The West-end of Bergholt Church (Oil Painting: at South Kensington).
XII. On the Stour near Dedham (Oil Painting: at South Kensington).
XIII. Old Sarum (Mezzotint: by David Lucas).
XIV. Salisbury Cathedral (Oil Painting: at South Kensington).
XV. Brighton Beach with Colliers (Oil Painting: at South Kensington).
XVI. The Leaping Horse (Full-sized Study for the Painting: at South Kensington).
XVII. Landscape with Cottage (Oil Sketch: at South Kensington).
XVIII. "The Grove", Hampstead (Oil Painting: at South Kensington).
XIX. The Cornfield (Oil Painting: in the National Gallery).
XX. Study for "The Valley Farm" (Oil Sketch: at South Kensington).
XXI. A Study of Tree Stems (Oil Sketch: at South Kensington).
XXII. Salisbury Cathedral from the Meadows (Mezzotint: by David Lucas).
XXIII. A Mill near Brighton (Oil Painting: at South Kensington).
EDINBURGH: PRINTED BY MORRISON AND GIBB LIMITED
XXIV. The Cenotaph (Oil Painting: in the National Gallery).
# Dejection: An Ode

Dejection: An Ode is a poem written by Samuel Taylor Coleridge in 1802. The poem in its original form was written to Sara Hutchinson, a woman who was not his wife, and discusses his feelings of love for her. The various versions of the poem describe Coleridge's inability to write poetry and living in a state of paralysis, but published editions remove his personal feelings and mention of Hutchinson. Warning: template has been deprecated.
* Dejection: An Ode, first published in 'Morning Post', October 4, 1802.
* Dejection: An Ode, in Sibylline Leaves (1817)
# Del Castillo v. McConnico

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
168 U.S. 674
Del Castillo v. McConnico
Wm. Winans Wall, for plaintiff in error.
J. Zach. Spearing, for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Deitrick v. Standard Surety & Casualty Company of New York

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
303 U.S. 471
Deitrick v. Standard Surety & Casualty Company of New York
Argued: March 7, 8, 1938. --- Decided: March 28, 1938
Messrs. George P. Barse, of Washington, D.C., and Robert E. Goodwin, of Boston, Mass., for petitioner.
Messrs. Frederic H. Chase and Raymond P. Baldwin, both of Boston, Mass., for respondent.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Deitsch v. Wiggins/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
82 U.S. 539
Deitsch v. Wiggins
Most of the assignments of error have been made in total disregard of the twenty-first rule of this court. That rule is necessary to the disposition of the business which presses upon us, and it is our intention hereafter to enforce strict compliance with its demands. If errors are not assigned in the manner required, the assignments will be treated as if not made at all, and we feel justified in passing without notice the greater number of those which are alleged to appear in this record. There are, however, some of the assignments which, though not made in full conformity with the rule, we think it is proper for us to consider.
The action was trespass 'de bonis asportatis,' and the plaintiffs in the court below averred 'properly' in the goods in themselves. The declaration was met by a plea of the general issue, and by a special plea alleging that the property in the goods was in O. S. Buell & Co., and that the alleged trespass consisted in a sheriff's seizure under an attachment issued out of the District Court of Gilpin County at the suit of Deitsch & Brothers. The special plea was in some respects informal, but instead of demurring, the plaintiffs traversed its averments, and the parties went to trial on the issues thus formed. It was then a material inquiry whether the ownership of the goods was in the plaintiffs when the seizure was made, or whether it was in O. S. Buell & Co., and to that inquiry the evidence offered by the defendants, that they had belonged to Buell & Co., that during the absence of the firm from the Territory, their clerk, without authority, and in fraudulent combination with the plaintiffs' agent, had made a sale of them to the plaintiffs, was undoubtedly pertinent. If there was no authority to sell, plainly the plaintiffs had acquired no title. And if the sale was a fraud upon the creditors of Buell & Co., the goods were liable to an attachment at the suit of those creditors. It was an error, therefore, to exclude the evidence.
The attachment should also have been received in connection with the proof of the unauthorized and fraudulent sale. It is no sufficient objection to it that it did not itself prove all the facts necessary to constitute a complete defence. It is said the special plea averring the attachment was bad. If so, it should have been met by a demurrer. But we think the plea contained all the averments essential to a justification, and had the facts set forth in it been established, a recovery by the plaintiffs below would have been impossible.
There are other errors apparent in the record, but as they are not properly assigned we pass them without notice.
JUDGMENT REVERSED, AND A VENIRE DE NOVO DIRECTED.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Del Arroyo v. Graham

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
227 U.S. 181
Del Arroyo v. Graham
Argued: January 21, 1913. --- Decided: February 3, 1913
Messrs. Francis H. Dexter and Frederic D. McKenney for appellants.
Mr. N. B. K. Pettingill for appellee.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Constitution of the United Arab Emirates/Part 4-1

Layout 2
CHAPTER (1) THE FEDERAL SUPREME COUNCIL
Article (34)
The Federal Supreme Council is the highest authority in the UAE. The Federal Supreme Council consists of the Rulers of all the member Emirates of the UAE; In case of a Ruler’s absence or when it is not possible for a Ruler to attend, the acting Ruler in the Emirate substitutes the Ruler in the Federal Supreme Council.
An Emirate has a single vote in the deliberations of the Council.
Article (34)
The Federal Supreme Council has the following powers: ​
    1. Draw up the general policy in all the matters vested in the UAE by the Constitution and consider anything that may achieve the goals of the UAE and the common interest of the member Emirates.
    2. Sanction the federal laws before they are promulgated including the Annual General Budget Act and the Closing Account Act.
    3. Sanction the decrees relating to the matters which, under the provisions of the Constitution, must be sanctioned or approved by the Supreme Council before these decrees are promulgated by the President of the UAE.
    4. Sanction, by decree, the international treaties and conventions.
    5. Upon a proposal by the President of the UAE, approve the appointment of the Prime Minister of the UAE, accept his resignation, and remove him from office.
    6. Approve the appointment and accept the resignation and, in the cases provided in the Constitution, the dismissal of the President and Judges of the Federal Supreme Court. In all cases, a decree is issued.
    7. Exercise high oversight over the UAE’s affairs, in general.
    8. Assume such responsibilities as may be provided in the Constitution or in the federal laws.
Article (48)
1. The Supreme Council lays down its by-law including its operating procedure and the way of voting on its decisions. The Council’s deliberations are held in camera.
    2. The Supreme Council shall establish a General Secretariat staffed by an adequate number of officers to assist the Council in performing its duties.
Article (49)
The decisions of the Supreme Council on substantive matters are taken by majority of five of its members provided that Abu Dhabi and Dubai Emirates must be among the five members. The minority shall abide by the opinion of the majority. The decisions of the Council on procedural matters are taken by majority vote. The Council’s by-law specifies these matters.
Article (50)
The sessions of the Supreme Council are held in the UAE’s capital city and may be held in such other place as may be agreed upon in advance.
# Constitution of the United Arab Emirates/Part 6

Layout 2
PART VI THE EMIRATES
Article (116)
An Emirate exercises all the powers not conferred by the Constitution upon the UAE, participates in the UAE’s structure, and benefits from its existence, services and protection.
Article (117)
The regime in an Emirate seeks, in particular, to keep security and order in its territories, provide public utilities, and raise the social and economic standards in the Emirate.
Article (118)
All the member Emirates of the UAE shall seek to harmonize their legislation in the different fields to unify that legislation as far as possible.
Two or more Emirates may, subject to the approval of the Supreme Council, gather together in a political or administrative unit, or unify all or part of their public services, or establish a single or joint administration to run any such service.
Article (119)
A federal law regulates the matters pertaining to the execution of judgments, judicial delegation, serving legal documents, and the extradition of criminals from an Emirate of the UAE to another, for the purpose of facilitating these matters.
# Constitution of the United Arab Emirates/Part 4

Layout 2
PART IV THE FEDERAL AUTHORITIES
Article (34)
The federal authorities consist of the following:
    1. The Federal Supreme Council.
    2. The UAE President and Vice President.
    3. The Federal Council of Ministers.
    4. The Federal National Council.
    5. The Federal Judiciary.
# De Beers Consol Mines v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
325 U.S. 212
De Beers Consol Mines v. United States
Argued: May 2, 1945. --- Decided: May 21, 1945
[Syllabus from pages 212-214 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Wm. D. Whitney, of New York City, for petitioners De Beers Consol. Mines and others.
Mr. John M. Harlan, of New York City, for petitioners Societe Internationale Forestiere et Miniere du Congo and another.
Mr. Herbert A. Berman, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Davenport v. Fletcher/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
57 U.S. 142
Davenport v. Fletcher
A motion has been made for a dismissal of this cause.
1. Because the judgment is not properly described in the writ of error.
2. Because the bond is given to a person who is not a party to the judgment.
3. Because the citation issued, is issued to a person who is not a party.
The objections are all founded in fact, and upon the authority of Samuel Smyth v. Strader, Perine & Co., 12 How. 327. The case is dismissed, with leave, however, to the counsel for the plaintiffs, to move for its reinstatement, during the present term.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Davenport v. Paris/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
136 U.S. 580
Davenport v. Paris
The judgment in this case is affirmed on the authority of Glenn v. Fant, 134 U.S. 398, ante, 583; Raimond v. Terrebonne Parish, 132 U.S. 192, ante, 57; Andes v. Slauson, 130 U.S. 435, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 573; and Bond v. Dustin, 112 U.S. 604, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 296, and cases cited. Affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# David

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "David."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, taxonomy, travel guide, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* David, author page for the second king of the United Kingdom of Israel, according to Hebrew bible
* "David" (2021), an episode of the US Army short film series The Calling
# Davenport v. Paris

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
136 U.S. 580
Davenport v. Paris
George A. Sanders, for plaintiff in error.
R. B. Lamon, for defendant in error.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Sulla 15.

​15. Faustus Cornelius Sulla, consul under Claudius, in a. d. 52, with L. Salvius Otho Titianus. He was the son-in-law of Claudius, having married his daughter Antonia. Soon after the accession of Nero, Paetus accused Pallas and Burrus of the design of placing Sulla upon the throne; and although the accusation was declared to be false, Nero became jealous of Sulla. One of the emperor's freedmen accordingly invented a plot which was falsely ascribed to Sulla, who was thereupon ordered by Nero to go into exile to Massilia, a. d. 59. But as Nero feared that Sulla from his proximity to the German legions might induce them to revolt, he was put to death by order of the emperor in a. d. 63. (Suet. Claud. 27 ; Tac. Ann. xii. 52, xiii. 23, 47, xiv. 57.)
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Sulla

​SULLA, the name of a patrician family of the Cornelia gens. This family was originally called Rufinus [Rufinus], and the first member of it who obtained the name of Sulla was P. Cornelius Sulla, who was flamen dialis and praetor in the second Punic war. [See below, No. 1.] This was stated by the dictator Sulla, in the second book of his Commentaries (Gell. i. 12), and is corroborated by Livy and other authorities. Plutarch therefore has made a mistake in saying that the dictator Sulla had this name given to him from a personal peculiarity. (Plut. Sull. 2.) The origin of the name is uncertain. Drumann, and most modern writers, suppose that it is a word of the same signification as Rufus or Rufinus, and refers simply to the red colour of the hair or the complexion; and Plutarch appears to have understood the word to have this meaning, since he relates (l. c.) that the dictator received the name of Sulla in consequence of his face being spotted with rough red blotches interspersed with the white. Macrobius (Sat. i. 17) gives quite a different explanation, and derives the word from Sibylla, which he says was given to P. Cornelius Rufinus, because he was the first to introduce the celebration of the Ludi Apollinares in accordance with the commands of the Sibylline books, and that this surname Sibylla was afterwards shortened into Sylla. This explanation of the word is repeated by Charisius (Inst. Gram. i. 20); but, independent of other objections, it must be rejected on the authority of Quintilian (i. 4. §25), who classes Sulla with other cognomens, which owed their origin to certain bodily peculiarities. Some modern writers, such as Cortius (ad Sall. Catil. 5), regard Sulla as a diminutive of Sura, which was a cognomen in several Roman gentes [Sura], and we are disposed to accept this as the most probable explanation of the word. It would be formed from Sura on the same analogy as puella from puera, and tenellus from tener (comp. Schneider, Elementarlehre der lateinischen Sprache, vol. i. p. 47, &c.). There is no authority for writing the word Sylla, as is done by many modern writers. On coins and inscriptions we always find Sula or Sulla, never Sylla.
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Sulla 11.

​11. P. Cornelius Sulla, the son of No. 9. Nothing is recorded respecting him. He was alive at the time of his father's death in b. c. 45. ("P. Sullam patrem mortuum habebamus," Cic. ad Fam. XV. 17., pro Sulla, 31.) Respecting the preceding Sullae see Drumann, Geschichte Roms, vol. ii. pp. 425—524.
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Sulla 14.

​14. L. Cornelius Sulla, probably son of No. 13, was consul suffectus under Claudius in a. d. 52. (Fasti.)
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Sulla 16.

​16. Cornelius Sulla, governor of Cappadocia, was put to death by Elagabalus. (Dion Cass. lxxix. 4.)
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Sulla 1.

​1. P. Cornelius (Rufinus) Sulla, the great-grandfather of the dictator Sulla, and the grandson of P. Cornelius Rufinus, who was twice consul in the Samnite wars. [Rufinus, Cornelius, No. 2.] His father is not mentioned. He was, as has been already mentioned, the first of the family who bore the surname of Sulla. He was flamen dialis, and likewise praetor urbanus and peregrinus in b. c. 212. The praetor of the preceding year, M. Attilius, had handed over to him certain sacred verses of the seer Marcius, partly referring to the past and partly to the future, and which commanded the Romans, among other things, to institute an annual festival in honour of Apollo. Upon this the senate ordered the decemviri to consult the Sibylline books, and as these gave the same command, Sulla presided over the first Ludi Apollinares, which were celebrated this year in the circus maximus. (Liv. xxv. 2, 3, 12, 15, 32, 41.)
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Sulla 10.

​10. Serv. Cornelius Sulla, also a son of No. 8, took part in both of Catiline's conspiracies. His guilt was so evident, that no one was willing to defend him; but we do not read that he was put to death along with the other conspirators. (Sall. Cat. 17, 47; Cic. pro Sull. 2.)
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Sulla 13.

​13. L. Cornelius (L. f. P. n.) Sulla Felix, son of No. 12, was consul in the reign of Tiberius, a.d. 33, with Serv. Sulpicius Galba. (Dion Cass. lviii. 20; Tac. Ann. vi. 15.) He is probably the same as the "L. Sulla, nobilis juvenis," mentioned by Tacitus, in a. d. 21 (Ann. iii. 31), and as the L. Sulla, whose advanced age in the reign of Claudius is spoken of by Dion Cassius (lx. 12).
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Sulca, Q. Baebius

​SULCA, Q. BAE'BIUS, one of the Roman ambassadors, sent to Ptolemy in Egypt, in b.c. 173. (Liv. xlii. 6.)
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Sulla 12.

​12. L. Cornelius P. f. P. n. Sulla, the son of No. 11, was consul b. c. 5 with Augustus. (Plin. H. N. vii. 11. s. 13; Dion Cass, index, lib. lv.)