OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Green v. Custard

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
64 U.S. 484
Green v. Custard
THIS case was brought up by writ of error from the District Court of the United States for the western district of Texas.
The facts and history of the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
It was argued by Mr. Frederick P. Stanton for the plaintiff in error, no counsel appearing for the defendant.
Upon the principal point involved in the case, Mr. Stanton said:
The court below properly acquired jurisdiction of the case as made by the original petition, which alleged that Custard was a citizen of Texas, and Green a citizen of Massachusetts.
Act of 1789, ch. 20, sec. 12.
But it had no authority to remand the case to the State court; the only alternative was, to dismiss it altogether.
The right to have his case tried in the Federal court, in a proper case for removal, is an absolute legal right in the party so removing it.
Ward v. Arredondo, Paine's C. C. R., 410.
Beardsley v. Torre, 4 Wash., 286.
Gibson v. Johnson, Peters C. C. R., 44.
Gordon v. Longest, 16 Pet., 97.
It is only causes improperly removed which will be remanded.
Laws U.S.C.ourts, 147, which quotes Pollard v. Dwight, 4 Cranch, 421.
Wright v. Wells, 1 Pet. C. C. R., 220, is an authority to show that a party, after a removal of the cause, cannot amend so as to oust the jurisdiction of the Federal court. And the rule is just; for otherwise a party would only have to exercise his ingenuity to suggest matters of amendment, either true or false, in order to send the case back to the State court. Of these amendments, the Federal court, having no jurisdiction, could not inquire at all.
Mr. Justice GRIER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Green v. Cleveland Cincinnati Chicago St. Louis Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
294 U.S. 715
Green v. Cleveland Cincinnati Chicago St. Louis Railway Company

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Green v. City of Stuart/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 744
Green v. City of Stuart
For opinion below, see 91 F.(2d) 603.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Green v. City of Stuart

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 744
Green v. City of Stuart
Mr. T. T. Oughterson, of Stuart, Fla., for petitioner.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Green v. Cleveland Cincinnati Chicago St. Louis Railway Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
294 U.S. 715
Green v. Cleveland Cincinnati Chicago St. Louis Railway Company
Mr. Carl Green, pro se.
For opinion below, see 126 Ohio St. 512, 186 N. E. 365, 87 A. L. R. 1268.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio. The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds no ground upon which a writ of certiorari should be issued. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Grimm's Household Tales, Volume 2/The Twelve Apostles

Legend 2. Notes
2.—THE TWELVE APOSTLES.
Three hundred years before the birth of the Lord Christ, there lived a mother who had twelve sons, but was so poor and needy that she no longer knew how she was to keep them alive at all. She prayed to God daily that he would grant that all her sons might be on the earth with the Redeemer who was promised. When her necessity became still greater she sent one of them after the other out into the world to seek bread for her. The eldest was called Peter, and he went out and had already walked a long way, a whole day's journey, when he came into a great forest. He sought for a way out, but could find none, and went farther and farther astray, and at the same time felt such great hunger that he could scarcely stand. At length he became so weak that he was forced to lie down, and he believed death to be at hand. Suddenly there stood beside him a small boy who shone with brightness, and was as beautiful and kind as an angel. The child smote his little hands together, until Peter was forced to look up and saw him. Then the child said, "Why art thou sitting there in such trouble?" "Alas!" answered Peter, "I am going about the world seeking bread, that I may yet see the dear Saviour who is promised, that is my greatest desire." The child said, "Come with me, and thy wish shall be fulfilled." He took poor Peter by the hand, and led him between some cliffs to a great cavern. When they entered it, everything was shining with gold, silver, and crystal, and in the midst of it twelve cradles were standing side by side. Then said the little angel, "Lie down in the first, and sleep a while, I will rock thee." Peter did so, and the angel sang to him and rocked him until he was asleep. And when he was asleep, the second brother came also, guided thither by his guardian angel, and he was rocked to sleep like the first, and thus came the others, one after the other, until all twelve lay there sleeping in the golden cradles. They slept, however, three hundred years, until the night when the Saviour of the world was born. Then they awoke, and were with him on earth, and were called the twelve apostles.
# Grimm's Household Tales, Volume 2/The Wilful Child

117.—THE WILFUL CHILD.
Once upon a time there was a child who was wilful, and would not do what her mother wished. For this reason God had no pleasure in her, and let her become ill, and no doctor could do her any good, and in a short time she lay on her death-bed. When she had been lowered into her grave, and the earth was spread over her, all at once her arm came out again, and stretched upwards, and when they had put it in and spread fresh earth over it, it was all to no purpose, for the arm always came out again. Then the mother herself was obliged to go to the grave, and strike the arm with a rod, and when she had done that, it was drawn in, and then at last the child had rest beneath the ground.
# Grimm's Household Tales, Volume 2/The Ungrateful Son

Other versions: The Ungrateful Son
145.—THE UNGRATEFUL SON.
A man and his wife were once sitting by the door of their house, and they had a roasted chicken set before them, and were about to eat it together. Then the man saw that his aged father was coming, and hastily took the chicken and hid it, for he would not permit him to have any of it. The old man came, took a drink, and went away. Now the son wanted to put the roasted chicken on the table again, but when he took it up, it had become a great toad, which jumped into his face and sat there and never went away again, and if any one wanted to take it off, it looked venomously at him as if it would jump in his face, so that no one would venture to touch it. And the ungrateful son was forced to feed the toad every day, or else it fed itself on his face; and thus he went about the world without knowing rest.
# Hall v. Jordan

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Hall v. Jordan."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Hall v. Jordan (82 U.S. 393)
* Hall v. Jordan (86 U.S. 271)
# Hall v. Jordan (82 U.S. 393)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
82 U.S. 393
Hall v. Jordan

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hall v. Jordan (86 U.S. 271)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
86 U.S. 271
Hall v. Jordan
AND TEN PER CENT. DAMAGES.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hall v. First National Bank of Bridgeport/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
193 U.S. 676
Hall v. First National Bank of Bridgeport
Mr. Daniel Davenport for appellant.
Mr. George P. Carroll for appellees.
Dismissed, per stipulation.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Goss v. Board of Education of Knoxville

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
373 U.S. 683
Goss v. Board of Education of Knoxville
Argued: March 20 and 21, 1963. --- Decided: June 3, 1963
Jack Greenberg, New York City, for petitioners.
Harlan Dodson, Nashville, Tenn., and S. Frank Fowler, Knoxville, Tenn., for respondents.
Burke Marshall, Washington, D.C., for the United States, as amicus curiae.
Jack Petree, Memphis, Tenn., for Board of Education of Memphis City Schools, as amicus curiae.
Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gossamer

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Gossamer."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* The Gossamer, a poem by Charlotte Smith
* "Gossamer," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Gossamer," in The New International Encyclopædia, New York: Dodd, Mead and Co. (1905)
* Gossamer (1915) a novel by George A. Birmingham
# Gossamer (Birmingham)

Gossamer is witty enough, in all conscience, but under its brilliant surface a big idea floats, a big emotion flows.... Canon Hannay presents a very different conception of the financier and his function. He sees organised finance not as an octopus, but as a gossamer, a delicate protective web thrown over the fields of human endeavour. "Ascher and men like him," he says, "have spun fine threads, covering every civilised land with a web of credit, infinitely complex, so delicate that a child's hand could tear it. . . . —H. W. Boynton in The Bookman.
GOSSAMER
BY G. A. BIRMINGHAM
Author of “General John Regan,” “Spanish Gold,” “The Lost Tribes,” “The Search Party,” etc., etc.
NEW YORK GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY
Copyright, 1915, By George H. Doran Company
BY G. A. BIRMINGHAM
Minnie's Bishop and Other Stories General John Regan The Lost Tribes Spanish Gold Lalage's Lovers The Search Party The Simpkins Plot The Major's Niece Priscilla's Spies The Red Hand of Ulster The Adventures of Dr. Whitty The Seething Pot The Bad Times Hyacinth From Dublin To Chicago
GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY
NEW YORK

### Contents

Chapter XIX
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1950, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 73 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hammond v. Johnston/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
142 U.S. 73
Hammond v. Johnston
It is well settled that where the supreme court of a state decides a federal question in rendering a judgment, and also decides against the plaintiff in error upon an independent ground not involving a federal question, and broad enough to maintain the judgment, the writ of error will be dismissed without considering the federal question. Hopkins v. McLure, 133 U.S. 380, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 407; Hale v. Akers, 132 U.S. 554, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 171; Bridge Co. v. Ctiy of Henderson, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 114. Tested by this rule, the writ of error must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hammond Packing Company v. Montana

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
233 U.S. 331
Hammond Packing Company v. Montana
Argued: March 11, 1914. --- Decided: April 13, 1914
Mr. M. S. Gunn for plaintiff in error.
[Syllabus from pages 331-333 intentionally omitted]
Mr. D. M. Kelly, Attorney General of Montana, and Mr. J. H. Alvord for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hammond v. Hopkins

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
143 U.S. 224
Hammond v. Hopkins

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hammond Packing Company v. Montana/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
233 U.S. 331
Hammond Packing Company v. Montana
Argued: March 11, 1914. --- Decided: April 13, 1914
This is an action to recover a license tax of 1 cent per pound sold for carrying on the business of selling oleomargarin. The answer, with some allegations not now material, admitted the facts and set up that § 4064 of the Political Code of Montana, as amended, by which the tax was imposed, violates the 14th Amendment. That is the only question raised here, so that other incidental or preliminary matters need not be mentioned. Judgment was entered for the state on the pleadings and the judgment was affirmed by the supreme court of the state.
The argument for the plaintiff in error is that, the tax being pronounced or assumed by the state courts to be a tax for revenue, it is unjustifiable to put oleomargarin in a class by itself and to discriminate, for instance, between it and butted. But we see no obstacle to doing so in the Constitution of the United States. Apart from interference with commerce among the states, a state may restrict the manufacture of oleomargarin in a way in which it does not hamper that of butter. Capital City Dairy Co. v. Ohio, 183 U.S. 238, 245, 246, 46 L. ed. 171, 175, 176, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 120. It even may forbid the manufacture altogether. Powell v. Pennsylvania, 127 U.S. 678, 32 L. ed. 253, 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 992, 1257. It may express and carry out its policy as well in a revenue as in a police law. Quong Wing v. Kirkendall, 223 U.S. 59, 62, 56 L. ed. 350, 351, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 192. The case really has been disposed of by previous decisions of this court. McCray v. United States, 195 U.S. 27, 62, 63, 49 L. ed. 78, 98, 99, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 769, 1 Ann. Cas. 561.
Judgment affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hammond v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
150 U.S. 633
Hammond v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hammond v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
150 U.S. 633
Hammond v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company
[Statement of Case from pages 633-636 intentionally omitted]
John B. Henderson, for the motion.
Daniel T. Jewett and Leverett Bell, opposed.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE.
The writs of error are dismissed, upon the authority of Hammond v. Johnston, 142 U.S. 73, 12 Sup. Ct. 141.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# History of Gardner, Massachusetts

History
of
Gardner,
Massachusetts,
from Its Earliest Settlement to 1860.
by
Lewis Glazier.
Worcester: Printed by Chas. Hamilton, Central Exchange. 1860.

## Contents

* To the Reader
* Introduction
* Table of Contents
* Incorporation of the Town
* Situation and Extent
* Family History
* Town History
* Notice of Daniel Shays
* Power and Duty of the Overseers of the Poor
* Power and Duty of the Master of the Work-house
* Duty of the Inmates
* List of Town Officers
* Valuation, etc.
* Roads
* Military
* Music
* Fire Department
* Fires and Injuries by Lightning
* Hail Storm
* Casualties
* Cemeteries
* Justices of the Peace
* Medical Practitioners
* Schools
* Business
* Libraries
* Ecclesiastical History
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# History of Gardner, Massachusetts/Cemeteries

Cemeteries.
The burying-ground, lying north of the common, is owned by the town; the land was bought of Seth Heywood, in 1785; some years after, ​an addition was made to it on the west side. In 1847, a tomb was built at the east end, for the use of the town.
In November, 1849, several of the inhabitants of South Gardner, made application to Asaph Wood, Esq., to issue a warrant to some one of the persons named in the said application, to meet at the office of Dr. H, C. Harriman, to organize into a company, to be called the South Gardner Green Bower Cemetery Company.
The persons met agreeably to notice, and voted to organize, according to the law made and provided for in such cases, into a company with the above name; and made choice of S. W. A. Stevens, for Clerk, and H. C. Harriman, Moderator.
The officers of the company are, five Directors, or Trustees, one of whom shall be President, a Treasurer and Clerk.
A code of by-laws was adopted for the regulation of the company; and a piece of land was purchased for the cemetery, south of the village, of Mr. John Sawin, which was fenced, and prepared, and laid out into lots for burial purposes, and has since been occupied as such. In 1858, the town voted to build a tomb in said cemetery, which has been completed.
​August 7th, 1858, the Town voted to purchase some land, near the west village, for a new cemetery, and chose Elisha S. Jackson, John W. Hill, and Francis Richardson, a committee for that purpose; they bought ten acres of land: seven or eight acres of Dea. Asa Perley, and two of S. W. Bancroft. The land lies west of Crystal Lake, and is called Crystal Lake Cemetery.
Considerable labor and expense is now being bestowed upon it, and it has the appearance of being a beautiful place (when completed) for the reception of the dead.
# History of Gardner, Massachusetts/Duty of the Inmates

Duty of the Inmates.
"All persons who are maintained in the work-house, shall be under the immediate care and control of the Master and Mistress of the house, ​and shall not absent themselves from the premises without their consent; and such as are able to labor, shall labor according to the directions of the Master. There shall be no ardent spirits used on the premises, except by the special direction of the Physician.
The above rules and regulations shall be laid before the town at a regular meeting, and when accepted by them, shall be the Rules and By-laws of the Gardner work-house; and shall be read in the work-house in the presence of the Master and Inmates, at the commencement of each year, by one of the Overseers.
These Rules and Regulations may be altered or amended at any legal meeting of the town."
At the annual meeting in March, 1849,
Voted, to give Levi Heywood, Charles W. Bush, Francis Richardson and others, leave to fence off a portion of the common, and set out ornamental trees on the same.
At the annual meeting in March, 1859,
Voted, to raise $4,500, to defray town charges the present year.
Voted, to raise $2,000, for the support of schools; voted to leave $300 of the school money in the hands of the Committee to expend in the ​several districts at their discretion, so as to make the schools as near equal as possible; and to give district No. 4, $50. No. 5, $50. No. 6, $75, and the remainder divided equally in proportion to the number of scholars.
Voted, that the tax on polls and personal property, &c., be paid to the Town Treasurer, on or before the 20th of July next, and there shall be allowed on the same, and also all who shall voluntarily pay their tax on real estate at that time, a discount of six per cent.; and all taxes on polls and personal property not paid at that time, be placed in the hands of a constable for collection; and all who shall voluntarily pay their tax on real estate, on or before the 1st of October next, a discount of four per cent., after which, all taxes not paid on the 1st of December, to be put in the hands of a constable for collection.
In accordance with a vote of the town, a building is being erected at a probable cost of $14,000 or $15,000, which is designed for a town hall, stores and other purposes.
There have been 648 legal town meetings held in Gardner since its incorporation as a town.
The amount of money granted, assessed and collected by the town, is $319,341.
# Guardian Savings Trust Company v. Road District

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
267 U.S. 1
Guardian Savings Trust Company v. Road District
Argued: Jan. 8, 1925. --- Decided: Jan 19, 1925
Messrs. George B. Rose, D. H. Cantrell, J. F. Loughborough, and A. W. Dobyns, all of Little Rock, Ark., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from page 2 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Henry D. Ashley, of Kansas City, Mo., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from page 3 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse