OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Jones v. City of Opelika (319 U.S. 103)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
319 U.S. 103
Jones v. City of Opelika (319 U.S. 103)
Argued: March 10, 11, 1943. --- Decided: May 3, 1943
The judgments in these cases were affirmed at the October Term, 1941. 316 U.S. 584, 62 S.Ct. 1231, 86 L.Ed. 1691, 141 A.L.R. 514. Because the issues in all three cases were of the same character as those brought before us in other cases by applications for certiorari at the present term, we ordered a reargument and heard these cases together with Nos. 480-487, Murdock et al. v. Pennsylvania. For the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court in Nos. 480-487, 319 U.S. 105, 63 S.Ct. 870, 87 L.Ed. --, decided this day, and in the dissenting opinions filed in the present cases after the argument last term, the Court is of opinion that the judgment in each case should be reversed. The judgments of this Court heretofore entered in these cases are therefore vacated, and the judgments of the state courts are reversed. So ordered.
Reversed.
For dissenting opinions of Mr. Justice REED, and Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER, see 319 U.S. 105, 63 S.Ct. 891.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In the Depths

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
It is not sweet content, be sure, That moves the nobler Muse to song, Yet when could truth come whole and pure From hearts that inly writhe with wrong?
’Tis not the calm and peaceful breast That sees or reads the problem true; They only know on whom it has prest Too hard to hope to solve it too.
Our ills are worse than at their ease These blameless happy souls suspect, They only study the disease, Alas, who live not to detect.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In the Dusk (Sanborn)

From The Harvard Lampoon
I do not know if she Were dark or fair; Nor if her cheeks were red, Or pale with care.
I know her lips were warm, Her eyes were bright With laughter as I kissed Her grief from sight.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In the Dozy Hours

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "In the Dozy Hours."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
# In the Dusk

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "In the Dusk."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* In the Dusk, a poem by Francis Ledwidge
* In the Dusk, a poem by Thomas Parker Sanborn
# Journal of the Royal Geographical Society of London

* Volume I (1831)
* Volume II (1832)
* Volume III (1833) IA
* Volume IV (1834) IA
* Volume V (1835) IA
* Volume VI (1836) IA
* Volume VII (1837) IA
* Volume VIII (1838) IA
* Volume IX (1839) IA
* Volume X (1840)
* Volume XI (1841) IA
* Volume XII (1842) IA
* Volume XIII (1843)
* Volume XIV (1844) IA
* Volume XV (1845) IA
* Volume XVI (1846) IA
* Volume XVII (1847) IA
* Volume XVIII (1848) IA
* Volume XIX (1849) IA
* Volume XX (1850) IA
* Volume XXI (1851) IA
* Volume XXII (1852)
* Volume XXIII (1853) IA
* Volume XXIV (1854)
* Volume XXV (1855)
* Volume XXVI (1856)
* Volume XXVII (1857)
* Volume XXVIII (1858)
* Volume XXIX (1859)
* Volume XXX (1860)
* Volume XXXI (1861)
* Volume XXXII (1862)
* Volume XXXIII (1863)
* Volume XXXIV (1864) (transcription project)
* Volume XXXV (1865) IA
* Volume XXXVI (1866)
* Volume XXXVII (1867) IA
* Volume XXXVIII (1868) IA
* Volume XXXIX (1869) IA
* Volume XL (1870) IA
* Volume XLI (1871)
* Volume XLII (1872)
* Volume XLIII (1873) IAIAIA
* Volume XLIV (1874)
* Volume XLV (1875)
* Volume XLVI (1876) IA
* Volume XLVII (1877) IA
* Volume XLVIII (1878) IA
* Volume XLIX (1879) IA
* Volume L (1880)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Journal of the Right Hon. Sir Joseph Banks/End matter

MACMILLAN & CO.'S BOOKS ON TRAVEL.
    TIMES.—"A bright and entertaining record of personal experiences."
    DAILY NEWS.—"General Molyneux’s clear, rapid, fresh, and good-humoured manner."
    DAILY NEWS.—"Valuable and interesting."
    TIMES.—"The book fills up an important blank between the explorations to the south of Mount Kenia and those in the Lake Rudolf region by Count Teleki and Mr. Chanler's countryman, Dr. Donaldson Smith."
# Journal of the Right Hon. Sir Joseph Banks/List of Officers

OFFICERS OF THE "ENDEAVOUR"
James Cook, Lieutenant in Command.
Zachary Hicks, Lieutenant, died 25th May 1771.
John Gore, Lieutenant.
Robert Molineux, Master, died 17th April 1771.
Richard Pickersgill, Master's Mate (Master, 16th April 1771).
Chester Clerke, Master's Mate.
Francis Wilkinson, A.B. (Master's Mate, 20th August 1768).
John Bootie, Midshipman, died 4th February 1771.
Jonathan Monkhouse, Midshipman, died 6th February 1771.
Patrick Saunders, Midshipman.
Isaac Smith, A.B. (Midshipman, 24th May 1770; Master's Mate, 27th May 1771).
Jos. Magra, A.B. (Midshipman, 27th May 1771).
Isaac Manley, Master's Servant (Midshipman, 5th February 1771).
William B. Monkhouse, Surgeon, died 5th November 1770.
William Perry, Surgeon's Mate (Surgeon, 6th November 1770).
Richard Orton, Clerk.
Charles Green, Astronomer, died 27th January 1771.
MR. BANKS'S STAFF
Daniel Carl Solander, Naturalist.
John Reynolds, Artist, died 18th December 1770.
Sydney Parkinson, Artist, died 26th January 1771.
Alexander Buchan, Artist, died 17th April 1769.
Herman Sporing, died 24th January 1771.
James Roberts, Servant.
Peter Briscoe, Servant.
| Thomas Richmond, Negro Servant George Dollin, Negro Servant | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | Frozen to death, 16th February 1769. |
The total on board (including a seaman pressed at Madeira) was 95; of these, 38 were lost by death during the voyage.
# Journal of the Optical Society of America

published 1917-1983
    Volume 1
    Volume 2
    Volume 3
    Volume 4
    Volume 5
    Volume 6
    Volume 7
    Volume 8
    Volume 9
    Volume 10
    Volume 11
    Volume 12
    Volume 13
    Volume 14
    Volume 15
    Volume 16
    Volume 17
    Volume 18
    Volume 19
    Volume 20
    Volume 21
    Volume 22
    Volume 23
    Volume 24
    Volume 25
    Volume 26
    Volume 27
    Volume 28
    Volume 29
    Volume 30
    Volume 31
    Volume 32
    Volume 33
    Volume 34
    Volume 35
    Volume 36
    Volume 37
    Volume 38
    Volume 39
    Volume 40
    Volume 41 (copyright)
    Volume 83
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Journal of the Indian Archipelago and Eastern Asia/Series 2/Volume 1/The Gamboge Tree

Describes several species of trees from the genus Garcinia in the plant family Guttiferae whose latex is used to produce the pigment gamboge.
THE GAMBOGE TREE.
The Gamboge plant or tree is woody, with thick ovate leaves, and the natives say that it sometimes grows to be 18 inches in diameter, though generally less, reaching a great height. The plant is not cultivated, but grows wild like the sugar maple in the forests of America. At the commencement of the rainy season parties of the natives go out in search of the trees, and finding one of the proper size they make a spiral incision in the bark on two sides of the tree, at the base of which they place joints of bambu, into which the sap percolates, day by day, for months. It is at first a yellowish fluid, hardening gradually into a viscous and then into a solid state. In the viscous state its fracture is glistening like crystal. In this consists the whole process of its preparation when pure, and on the spot where it is gathered it sells for only 4, 5 to 6 ticals per picul. It hardens in the bambu.
The common means of adulteration is rice flour or the bark of the tree pulverized, but this last is apt to impart a greenish tinge. Sand is also added.
The flowers are said to resemble those of the "egg-plant" and the fruit to be small and globular. Accounts differ as to the season of gathering the gum. Some persons say they have been accustomed to gather it in the rainy season while others say they collect it in the dry season. A good tree generally yields enough of sap to fill three joints of bambu, 18 to 20 inches long and 1½ inches in diameter. The trees are said to grow on both high and low land. If the trees are tapped every year it shortens their lives, but when the gum is only drawn every alternate year they do not appear to suffer injury and last for many years. There are several kinds of trees which produce substances resembling gamboge, but they differ essentially from it.
Although Kamboja is the appropriate locality of the plant, there are at present large forests of it in the province of Chantibun in Siam. It does not grow in Kamboja so far north as Matabong. The name is unquestionably derived from the native name of the place of its original discovery, which should be written in accordance with both Kambojan and Siamese usage—Kambuja. Hence the Portuguese "Gutta Kambuja" "Kambuja drops." The Siamese call it Rŏng, sounding the o as in cone but shorter.
# Journal of the Optical Society of America/Volume 30/Issue 12/Editorial Comment

Journal of the
Optical Society
of America
Editorial Comment
Cooperation Among Color Experts
THE papers on the Munsell Color System which appear in this issue will appeal on their own merits to all workers in the field of colorimetry. To others, the plan of simultaneous publication will be of interest as an example of an earnest effort, initiated by the authors, to advance scientific knowledge in an orderly manner. Colorimetry has always been a controversial subject. It is of importance to chemists, physicists, physiologists, and psychologists, each group having its own background and habits of thought. To confound the confusion, a term may connote different concepts in the different fields, or several terms may refer to the same concept.
Impartial evaluation of the Munsell Color System is especially difficult because the writings of A. H. Munsell include a discussion of two systems whose underlying concepts are fundamentally different. One set of concepts appeals to the instincts of the physicist, while the other seems more natural to the psychologist. As a practical matter the two systems may be much alike, and no useful purpose would be served if the importance of one system were exaggerated at the expense of the other. Realizing that this might occur if the papers in this series were published separately as individual contributions, the several authors have undertaken to forestall such a result by a free interchange of data, and by correspondence and conferences aimed at a reconciliation of opposing points of view. When a unified plan of publication had been evolved, the manuscripts were submitted to an associate editor of the Journal who was empowered by the authors to make such additional changes as were found necessary to present an impartial description of the work of A. H. Munsell in a language which is consistent throughout the series.
It is probable that the field of colorimetry will soon supply another example of cooperation among scientists on an even larger scale. In 1920, the Optical Society appointed a Committee on Colorimetry which published its report in the Journal two years later. This report was widely accepted and the supply of reprints was soon exhausted. As the subject of colorimetry became of greater importance and better data became available, a new committee was appointed which has been engaged for several years on the preparation of a report that will present the composite thoughts of a large group of experts who have often discussed the same phenomena in a variety of languages. In size and subject matter, this report is assuming the aspect of a treatise, and the care that is being taken in its preparation should endow it with a long and useful life. It is greatly to the credit of the individuals on this committee who have worked so assiduously, that they are willing and eager, purely for the sake of advancing the art, to relinquish the prestige that attaches to the publication of individual contributions, and to cooperate in an endeavor where the status of an individual member of the committee approaches complete anonymity.
# In the Matter of Alois Muhlbauer

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
336 U.S. 964
In the Matter of Alois Muhlbauer
Treating the application in each of these cases as a motion for leave to file a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus, leave to file is denied.
The CHIEF JUSTICE, Mr. Justice REED, Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER, and Mr. Justice BURTON are of the opinion that there is want of jurisdiction. U.S.C.onstitution, Article III, Sec. 2, Clause 2; see Ex parte Betz and companion cases, 1946, all 329 U.S. 672, 67 S.Ct. 39, 91 L.Ed. 593; Milch v. United States, 1947, 332 U.S. 789, 68 S.Ct. 92, 92 L.Ed. 371; Brandt v. United States, 1948, 333 U.S. 836, 68 S.Ct. 603, 92 L.Ed. 1119; In re Eichel, 1948, 333 U.S. 865, 68 S.Ct. 787, 92 L.Ed. 1144; Everett v. Truman, 1948, 334 U.S. 824, 68 S.Ct. 1081, 92 L.Ed. 1753.
Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, Mr. Justice MURPHY, and Mr. Justice RUTLEDGE are of the opinion that argument should be heard on the motions for leave to file the petitions in order to settle what remedy, if any, the petitioners have.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In the Matter of Electric Power & Light Corporation Electric Bond and Share Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
337 U.S. 903
In the Matter of Electric Power & Light Corporation Electric Bond and Share Company
The petitions for a stay are denied.
Messrs. Samuel Becker and Nathan B. Kogan, for petitioners.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In the Matter of Alois Muhlbauer/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
336 U.S. 964
In the Matter of Alois Muhlbauer
Mr. Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
108 U.S. 1
In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Industrial Trust Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
296 U.S. 220
Industrial Trust Company v. United States
Argued: Nov. 22, 1935. --- Decided: Dec 9, 1935
Mr. Charles P. Taft, 2nd., of Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioners.
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and David E. Hudson, of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Industrial Trust Company v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
296 U.S. 220
Industrial Trust Company v. United States
Argued: Nov. 22, 1935. --- Decided: Dec 9, 1935
Petitioners, as executors of the estate of William M. Greene, who died in 1930, filed an estate tax return and paid the amount of the federal estate tax disclosed thereby. A paid-up life insurance policy of $42,000 was omitted from the return. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue declared a deficiency and included the amount of this policy in the gross estate. Petitioners filed a claim for refund, which was rejected by the Commissioner. Thereupon, this proceeding was brought in the Court of Claims to recover the amount of the claim. That court held against the right to recover and dismissed the petition.
The policy, issued in 1892, promised to make payment to the wife of the decedent, as sole beneficiary if living; and, if not living, to the surviving children of the decedent; and, in the event of none surviving, then to the executors, administrators, or assigns of the decedent. In 1912, the policy became a paid-up policy requiring no futher payment of premiums. No power was reserved to change beneficiaries, borrow on the policy, or surrender it. The wife of the decedent predeceased him; but he was survived by three children, to whom the proceeds of the policy were paid upon his death.
The case of Lewellyn v. Frick, 268 U.S. 238, 45 S.Ct. 487, 69 L.Ed. 934, arose under the Revenue Act of 1918. This case arises under the Act of 1926, § 302(g), 26 USCA § 411(g), which is the same as section 402(f) of the former act (40 Stat. 1097). Subdivision (h) of the 1926 act, 26 USCA § 411(h), however, provides that subdivisions (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), and (g) shall apply to 'transfers, trusts, estates, interests, rights, powers, and relinquishment of powers, as severally enumerated and described therein, whether made, created, arising, existing, exercised, or relinquished before or after the enactment of this Act (February 26, 1926).' Whether any of these terms apply to an amount receivable by a beneficiary, under a policy such as we have here, is fairly debatable. See Wyeth v. Crooks (D.C.) 33 F.(2d) 1018, 1019. If any of them do apply, the provision is open to grave doubt as to its constitutionality, and the rule of the Frick Case controls.
The foregoing facts bring the case clearly within our decision just announced in Bingham v. United States, 296 U.S. 211, 56 S.Ct. 180, 80 L.Ed. 160; and the judgment of the court below is accordingly
Reversed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Industrial Unionism

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Industrial Unionism."
* related portals: Industries.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.

## Leaflets and pamphlets

* Industrial Unionism (1908), by William Ernst Trautmann
* "Industrial Unionism" (also known as "Industrial Union Methods"?) (c. 1909), by Eugene Victor Debs
* Industrial Unionism and the I.W.W. (also known as " I.W.W. Industrial Unionism"?) (c. 1910), by Vincent Saint John
* Industrial Unionism: the Hope of the Workers (c. 1913), by William Ernst Trautmann
* Industrial Unionism: the Road to Freedom (c. 1913), by Joseph James Ettor
* Industrial Union Methods (c. 1912), by William Ernst Trautmann

## Newspapers and journals

* Industrial Union Bulletin (1906–1909), published by the "Detroit IWW"
* Industrial Union News (1912–1924), published by the "Detroit IWW" and later the Workers' International Industrial Union
# James v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "James v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* James v. United States (202 U.S. 401)
* James v. United States (366 U.S. 213)
# James v. Todd/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
358 U.S. 206
James v. Todd
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# James v. United States (202 U.S. 401)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
202 U.S. 401
James v. United States
Argued: April 6, 9, 1906. --- Decided: May 21, 1906
Messrs. Morgan H. Beach and A. A. Hoehling, Jr., for appellant.
Assistant Attorney General Van Orsdel and Mr. Felix Brannigan for appellee.
Mr. Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# James v. United States (366 U.S. 213)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
James v. United States, 366 U.S. 213 (1961), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that money obtained by a taxpayer illegally was taxable income, even though the law might require the taxpayer to repay the ill-gotten gains to the person from whom they had been taken. Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Concurrence/Dissents

    Black
    Clark
    Harlan
    Whittaker
United States Supreme Court
366 U.S. 213
James v. United States (366 U.S. 213)
Argued: Nov. 17, 1960. --- Decided: May 15, 1961
Mr. Richard E. Gorman, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.
Mr. Howard A. Heffron, New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice WARREN announced the judgment of the Court and an opinion in which Mr. Justice BRENNAN, and Mr. Justice STEWART concur.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# James v. United Artists Corporation

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
305 U.S. 410
James v. United Artists Corporation
Argued: Dec. 8-9, 1938. --- Decided: Jan 3, 1939
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of West Virginia.
Messrs. W. Holt Wooddell and Clarence W. Meadows, both of Charleston, W.Va., for appellant.
Mr. Robert G. Kelly, of Charleston, W.Va., for appellee.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse