OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Municipal and Official Handbook of the City of Auckland, New Zealand/Appendix D

D.
SHIPPING COMPANIES AND AGENTS.
With Offices in the City.
Aberdeen Line—Agents: Messrs. Dalgety & Co. and L. D. Nathan & Co.
American and Australian Steamship Line—Agents: New Zealand Shipping Company, Ltd.
Anchor Shipping and Foundry Co., Ltd., Nelson—Agents: Messrs. Russell & Somers.
Blackball Coal Co., Ltd.—Local Manager: T. N. Grange.
​British Imperial Oil Co.—Agents: Messrs. Gollin & Co.
British India Steam Navigation Co.—Agents: Union S.S. Co. and N.Z. Shipping: Co.
Burns, Philp Line.
Canadian and Australian R.M. Line—Agents: Union S.S. Co.
Canadian Government Merchant Marine.
Commonwealth and Dominion Line—Agents: Messrs. Heather, Roberton, Ltd., and Farmers' Co-operative Auctioneering Co., Ltd.
Compagnie Francais des Phosphates De L'Oceanie—Agents: Messrs. Henderson & Macfarlane.
Craig Line of Steamers—Agents: Messrs. J. J. Craig, Ltd.
Cunard Line (Australasian Service)—Agents: Messrs. Heather, Roberton, Ltd., and Farmers' Co-operative Auctioneering Co., Ltd.
East Coast Shipping Company—Agents: Messrs. Watkin & Wallis.
Eastern and Australian Line—Agents: Messrs. Russell & Somers.
Federal Steam Navigation Company—Agents: N.Z. Shipping Co.
General Steamship Corporation of San Francisco—Agents: Messrs. Spedding, Limited.
Holt's Blue Funnel Line—Agents: Messrs. Henderson & Macfarlane.
Huddart-Parker Line.
Kaipara Steamship Company—Agents: Northern Steamship Company.
Messageries Maritimes—Agents: Messrs. Henderson & Macfarlane.
New Zealand Shipping Company.
N.Y.K. (Nippon Yusen Kaisha)—Agents: Messrs. Burns, Philp and Co.
Northern Steamship Company.
Oceanic Steamship Company—Agents: Messrs. Russell & Somers.
​Orient Company—Agents: Union S.S. Co.
P. and O. Branch Service—Agents: Messrs. Henderson & Macfarlane.
P. and O. Steam Navigation Company—Agents: Messrs. Russell & Somers.
Piako Steamship Company—Agents: Messrs. Watkin & Wallis.
Richardson Steamship Company—Agents: Messrs. Watkin & Wallis.
Riverhead Steamship Company—Agents: Messrs. Bradney & Binns.
Royal Dutch Packet Line—Agents: Messrs. Russell & Somers.
Shaw, Savill and Albion Co., Ltd.—Agents: Messrs. L. D. Nathan & Co. Ltd., A.S. Paterson & Co. Ltd., and Dalgety & Co. Ltd.
Union Steamship Company.
United States and Australasian Line—Agents: Messrs. Dalgety & Co.
Vacuum Oil Co. Proprietary, Ltd.
Waikato Shipping Company.
White Star Line—Agents: Messrs. L. D. Nathan & Co., and Dalgety & Co.
Yamashita Kisen Kaisha—Agents: Messrs. Heather, Roberton, Ltd.
Messrs. Thomas Cook & Sons have offices in Auckland, and are Agents for all Passenger Lines.
# Motion of the American Psychological Association to Withdraw as Amicus Curiae

Court of Appeal No. A020935, San Francisco Superior Court No. 769-529
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DAVID MOLKO,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
TRACY LEAL,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
HOLY SPIRIT ASSOCIATION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF WORLD CHRISTIANITY, et al.,
Defendants and Respondents
AND RELATED ACTION.
No. SF 25038
Court of Appeal No. A020935
San Francisco Superior Court No. 769-529

### MOTION OF THE AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION TO WITHDRAW AS AMICUS CURIAE

TO: The Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of The California Supreme Court
On February 10, 1987, the American Psychological Association ("APA") joined with numerous behavioral and social scientists, as individual amici, in submitting a brief amicus curiae in the above-captioned case. Since that time, it has come to the attention of APA's Board of Directors that one of its constituent Boards had, previous to that date, established a task force to study the issues addressed in the amicus brief. That task force has not yet reached any final conclusions.
Accordingly, the Board of Directors now believes it was premature, for organizational reasons, to endorse the positions taken in the amicus brief prior to completion of the task force study. For this reason, and because the APA review process will take some time to complete, APA respectfully moves this Court to withdraw as signatory of the amicus brief rather than risk delay in the adjudication of this case.
By this action, APA does not mean to suggest endorsement of any views opposed to those set forth in the amicus brief. Nor does APA mean to suggest that it will not ultimately be able to subscribe to the views expressed in the brief.
Additionally, in this motion APA does not speak for the individual amici who are co-signers of the brief; they continue to participate as amici, and their endorsement of the positions taken in the amicus brief remains unaffected. This motion does not withdraw the brief; it merely withdraws APA's participation as an amicus.
APA regrets any inconvenience its motion may cause this Court.
Dated: March 27, 1987
Los Angeles, California
Respectfully submitted,
ROBERT H. PHILIBOSIAN
MORTON B. JACKSON MacDonald, Halsted & Laybourne 725 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 629-3000
BRUCE J. ENNIS DONALD N. BERSOFF Ennis Friedman & Bersoff 1200 17th Street, N.W., Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: (202) 775-8100
Attorneys for Amici American Psychological Association, et al.
# Motor Bus

This macaronic poem commemorates the introduction of a motorised omnibus service in the city of Oxford.
MOTOR BUS
WHAT is this that roareth thus? Can it be a Motor Bus? Yes, the smell and hideous hum Indicat Motorem Bum! Implet in the Corn and High Terror me Motoris Bi: Bo Motori clamitabo Ne Motore caedar a Bo— Dative be or Ablative So thou only let us live: Whither shall thy victims flee? Spare us, spare us, Motor Be! Thus I sang; and still anigh Came in hordes Motores Bi, Et complebat omne forum Copia Motorum Borum. How shall wretches live like us Cincti Bis Motoribus? Domine, defende nos Contra hos Motores Bos!
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1925, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 98 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Motivational Analysis of Actions of Clifford C. Sims

* related portals: NARA Collection, Clifford Sims.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
From the National Archives and Records Administration; Record Group 472: Records of the U.S. Forces in Southeast Asia, 1950 - 1976; Series: Medal of Honor Awards Case Files, 1965 - ca. 1972; File Unit: Clifford Sims, 2/21/1968 - 2/21/1968; ARC #305381
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
MOTIVATIONAL ANALYSIS
Basing the following opinion on what I know of the battlefield situation, the condition of our men, the resistance encountered, and the resultant frame of mind which most of our men were in, I would feel quite qualified to judge the motivational factors involved in Staff Sergeant Sims' action which sacrificed his life for his men. And yet, even moreso do I feel able to correctly analyze this man's motivation on the basis of a personal knowledge of him, of his accomplishments, of his dedication and loyalty.
Staff Sergeant Sims was not a man to act rashly; he made decisions with the firm belief that he was right, and he made them without counting the cost to himself. He was intensely loyal to his men, and never put his own interest above theirs. Just five days before he died he was assigned the task of securing an LZ during heavy fighting. He assured that his men were properly positioned and behind suitable cover. And he made certain that the wounded were expiditiously evacuated. Yet he never considered cover for himself during a full six hour period during which he was under a harassing sniper fire. His devotion was to his duty and to his men. And so I believe, as he never acted otherwise that I was aware of, did he consider the safety of his men on 21 February, fully aware of the sacrifice he was making, yet more poignantly concerned for the fate of his men were he to choose any other course. In simple fact, Staff Sergeant Sims knowingly and willingly laid down his life so that his comrades might live.
RICHARD J. TALLMAN LTC, Infantry Commanding (2/501)
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Motoring Magazine and Motor Life

An early periodical magazine on automobiles and their functions. Founder Marriott died in 1884.
* 1913
** October 1913 (transcription project)
** November 1913 (transcription project)
** December 1913 (transcription project)
* 1915
** January 1915 (transcription project)
** February 1915 (transcription project)
** July 1915
# Murphy v. United States (104 U.S. 464)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
104 U.S. 464
Murphy v. United States
APPEAL from the Court of Claims.
Murphy entered into a written contract with the United States for excavating a portion of the pit for a dry dock, and was paid at the contract price for all the work which he performed.
He subsequently presented to the Navy Department a claim for damages suffered by reason of certain alleged violations of the contract, and for extra work. The department adopted a basis of adjustment, to which he agreed; and there was paid to him a certain sum, which, upon full information as to the principles upon which it was awarded, he accepted, and gave a receipt in full.
He some time thereafter brought suit in the court below for the same claim, adding, however, a further item, of which there was no proof.
The court dismissed the petition, and he appealed.
Mr. James W. Denver and Mr. Luther H. Pike for the appellant.
The Solicitor-General and Mr. John S. Blair for the United States.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Murphy v. United States (369 U.S. 402)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
369 U.S. 402
Murphy v. United States (369 U.S. 402)
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the appeal. DiBella v. United States, 369 U.S. 121, 82 S.Ct. 654.
Mr. Justice BLACK dissents.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Murphy v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Murphy v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Murphy v. United States (104 U.S. 464)
* Murphy v. United States (272 U.S. 630)
* Murphy v. United States (369 U.S. 402)
See also United States v. Murphy.
# Murphy v. Victor Sewing-Machine Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
112 U.S. 688
Murphy v. Victor Sewing-Machine Company
John R. McBride and J. G. Sutherland, for appellant.
Chas. W. Bennett, for appellee.
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Murphy v. Turman Oil Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
300 U.S. 685
Murphy v. Turman Oil Company
For opinion below, see 97 S.W.(2d) 485.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals, 3d Supreme Judicial District, State of Texas. Dismissed on motion of counsel for the petitioners.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Murphy v. United States (272 U.S. 630)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
272 U.S. 630
Murphy v. United States (272 U.S. 630)
Argued: and Submitted Nov. 24, 1926. --- Decided: Dec 6, 1926
The Attorney General and Mrs. Mabel Walker Willebrandt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.
Messrs. Thomas Murphy and Vincent Murphy, pro se.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Murphy v. United States (369 U.S. 402)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
369 U.S. 402
Murphy v. United States (369 U.S. 402)
Albert A. Fiok, for petitioners.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg, for the United States.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Murphy v. Turman Oil Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
300 U.S. 685
Murphy v. Turman Oil Company
Mr. J. N. Saye, of Longview, Tex., for petitioners.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Murphy v. United States (104 U.S. 464)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
104 U.S. 464
Murphy v. United States
We are clearly of the opinion that the acceptance by the claimant, without objection, of the amount allowed by the Secretary of the Navy, in his adjustment of the account presented to him, was equivalent to a final settlement and compromise of all the items of the present claim included in that account. There is nothing in the findings of the court below to warrant a judgment in favor of the claimant upon the only item included in the petition in this case which was not mentioned specifically in the account presented to the Secretary of the Navy and passed on by him in the adjustment he made.
Judgment affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# New Jersey Statutes Annotated/Title 59/Chapter 9/Section 9-2

§ 59:9-2. Judgments, interest, limitations
    a. No interest shall accrue prior to the entry of judgment against a public entity or public employee.
    b. No judgment shall be granted against a public entity or public employee on the basis of strict liability, implied warranty or products liability.
    c. No punitive or exemplary damages shall be awarded against a public entity.
    d. No damages shall be awarded against a public entity or public employee for pain and suffering resulting from any injury; provided, however, that this limitation on the recovery of damages for pain and suffering shall not apply in cases of permanent loss of a bodily function, permanent disfigurement or dismemberment where the medical treatment expenses are in excess of $ 3,600.00. For purposes of this section medical treatment expenses are defined as the reasonable value of services rendered for necessary surgical, medical and dental treatment of the claimant for such injury, sickness or disease, including prosthetic devices and ambulance, hospital or professional nursing service.
    e. If a claimant receives or is entitled to receive benefits for the injuries allegedly incurred from a policy or policies of insurance or any other source other than a joint tortfeasor, such benefits shall be disclosed to the court and the amount thereof which duplicates any benefit contained in the award shall be deducted from any award against a public entity or public employee recovered by such claimant; provided, however, that nothing in this provision shall be construed to limit the rights of a beneficiary under a life insurance policy. No insurer or other person shall be entitled to bring an action under a subrogation provision in an insurance contract against a public entity or public employee.
# New Jersey Statutes Annotated/Title 59/Chapter 2

* § 59:2-1. Immunity of public entity generally
* § 59:2-1.1. Immunity from liability for certain civil actions arising from roadway solicitations
* § 59:2-1.2. Immunity from liability for public entities, employees for damages resulting from computer failure in ...
* § 59:2-2. Liability of public entity
* § 59:2-3. Discretionary activities
* § 59:2-4. Adoption or failure to adopt or enforce a law
* § 59:2-5. Issuance, denial, suspension or revocation of permit, license, etc
* § 59:2-6. Failure to inspect, or negligent inspection of, property
* § 59:2-7. Recreational facilities
* § 59:2-8. Public assistance programs--termination of benefits
* § 59:2-9. Slander of title
* § 59:2-10. Public employee conduct----limitation on entity liability
* § 59:2-11. Actions of public entity, employee; immunity
# New Jersey Statutes Annotated/Title 59/Chapter 3

* § 59:3-1. Liability generally
* § 59:3-2. Discretionary activities
* § 59:3-3. Execution or enforcement of laws
* § 59:3-4. Acting under unconstitutional, invalid or inapplicable laws
* § 59:3-5. Adoption or failure to adopt or enforce any law
* § 59:3-6. Issuance, denial, suspension or revocation of permit, license, etc
* § 59:3-7. Failure to inspect, or negligent inspection of, property
* § 59:3-8. Institution or prosecution of judicial or administrative proceeding
* § 59:3-9. Entry upon property
* § 59:3-10. Misrepresentation
* § 59:3-11. Recreational facilities
* § 59:3-12. Public assistance programs----termination of benefits
* § 59:3-13. Slander of title
* § 59:3-14. Public employee immunity--exception
# New Jersey Statutes Annotated/Title 59/Chapter 1

* § 59:1-1. Short title
* § 59:1-2. Legislative declaration
* § 59:1-3. Definitions
* § 59:1-4. Effect upon liability based on contract or right to relief other than damages
* § 59:1-5. Workmen's compensation laws not repealed
* § 59:1-6. Military and veterans laws not repealed
* § 59:1-7. Effect of assumption of liability by United States
# New Jersey Statutes Annotated/Title 59/Chapter 6

* § 59:6-1. Definitions
* § 59:6-2. Failure to provide medical facilities or mental institutions
* § 59:6-3. Prevention of disease or controlling communication of disease
* § 59:6-4. Failure to make physical or mental examination or to make adequate physical or mental examination
* § 59:6-5. Diagnosing or failing to diagnose mental illness or drug dependence
* § 59:6-6. Determinations in accordance with applicable enactments
* § 59:6-7. Escape of person confined; injuries between inmates
* § 59:6-8. Immunity for public entities, employees relative to certain actions for response to CBR agents
* § 59:6-9. Procedures, rules, regulations
# New Jersey Statutes Annotated/Title 59/Chapter 5

* § 59:5-1. Failure to provide prison, jail or correctional facilities
* § 59:5-2. Parole or escape of prisoner; injuries between prisoners; pursuit for law enforcement purposes
* § 59:5-3. Repealed by P.L. 1988, c. 55 § 1 effective July 8, 1988
* § 59:5-4. Failure to provide police protection
* § 59:5-5. Failure to make arrest or retain person arrested in custody
* § 59:5-6. No liability after voluntary release from police custody
# New Jersey Statutes Annotated/Title 59/Chapter 9

* § 59:9-1. . . .
* § 59:9-2. Judgments, interest, limitations
# New Jersey Statutes Annotated/Title 59

* SUBTITLE 1. NEW JERSEY TORT CLAIMS ACT
** CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
** CHAPTER 2. IMMUNITY AND LIABILITY; PUBLIC ENTITY
** CHAPTER 3. IMMUNITY AND LIABILITY; PUBLIC EMPLOYEE
** CHAPTER 4. PUBLIC PROPERTY LIABILITY OF PUBLIC ENTITY; DANGEROUS CONDITIONS
** CHAPTER 5. CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES AND POLICE ACTIVITIES
** CHAPTER 6. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTIVITIES
** CHAPTER 7. TAX LAWS
** CHAPTER 7A. COMMUNITY SERVICE
** CHAPTER 8. CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITIES
** CHAPTER 9. SUIT AND JUDGMENT
** CHAPTER 10. INDEMNIFICATION
** CHAPTER 10A. DEFENSE OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
** CHAPTER 11. SETTLING CLAIMS
** CHAPTER 12. ESTABLISHMENT OF FUND, REPEALERS AND APPLICABILITY
* SUBTITLE 2. NEW JERSEY CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY ACT
** CHAPTER 13. GENERALLY
* SUBTITLE 3. ANNUAL REPORTS, SEVERABILITY, APPROPRIATION, AND EFFECTIVE DATE
** CHAPTER 14. IN GENERAL
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# New Jersey Statutes Annotated/Title 59/Chapter 4

* § 59:4-1. Definitions
* § 59:4-2. Liability generally
* § 59:4-3. Actual notice; constructive notice
* § 59:4-4. Failure to provide emergency warning signals
* § 59:4-5. Failure to provide ordinary traffic signals----Immunity
* § 59:4-6. Plan or design immunity
* § 59:4-7. Weather conditions; effect on use of streets and highways--immunity
* § 59:4-8. Condition of unimproved public property--immunity
* § 59:4-9. Unimproved and unoccupied portions of certain lands--immunity
* § 59:4-10. Immunity from liability relative to community forestry
# New Poems (Shorter)/A Child's Song

A CHILD'S SONG
The starlings they have come to town, With polka dots on their robes of brown; They sit a crowd on the old plane tree, And sing this quaint old melody: Creak, creak, pipe, pipe, squeak, squeak, sweet! They come with winter snow and sleet— Creak, creak, pipe, pipe, squeak, squeak, sweet!
Oh, starling, starling, tell me true Of pleasant lands that have sheltered you Of running brook and woodland tree! This is the tale he told to me: Creak, creak, pipe, pipe, squeak, squeak, sweet! Above the hum of busy street— Creak, creak, pipe, pipe, squeak, squeak, sweet!
The starlings all will fly away, With ice and snow on a sunshine day, Starling, starling, do not go! I miss your pretty singing so:
Chirp, chirp, cheep, cheep, tweet, tweet, sweet! 'Tis but the sparrows in the street— Chirp, chirp, cheep, cheep, tweet, tweet, sweet!
In summer, in a woodland glade, When I shall walk all unafraid, Lured by the blossom and the bee, I'll hear this quaint old melody: Creak, creak, pipe, pipe, squeak, squeak, sweet! And echo call from her retreat— Creak, creak, pipe, pipe, squeak, squeak, sweet!
The starlings they have come from town, With polka dots on their robes of brown: Oh, starling, starling, tell me true, Of city far, now what think you? Creak, creak, pipe, pipe, squeak, squeak, sweet! This fine tale he did repeat— Creak, creak, pipe, pipe, squeak, squeak, sweet!