OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Kelley v. Gordon

The U.S. Supreme Court held in Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 489 (2012), that the Eighth Amendment forbade mandatory sentences of life without parole for juvenile offenders. In Kelley v. Gordon, 2015 Ark. 277, the Arkansas Supreme Court held that Miller applied retroactively to juvenile offenders who had already been sentenced to life without parole.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
2015 Ark. 277
WENDY KELLEY, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION v. ULONZO GORDON
Appeal from the Lee County Circuit Court
No. CV-14-1082. --- Delivered: June 18, 2015.
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
Leslie Rutledge, Att'y Gen., by: Christian Harris, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellant.
Jeff Rosenzweig, for appellee.
Opinion of the court by Justice ROBIN F. WYNNE.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kelley v. Everglades Drainage Dist

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
319 U.S. 415
Kelley v. Everglades Drainage Dist
Argued: June 1, 1943. --- Decided: June 21, 1943
See 320 U.S. 214, 63 S.Ct. 1444, 87 L.Ed. --.
Mr. Miller Walton, of Miami, Fla., for petitioner.
Messrs. M. Lewis Hall and Alfred E. Sapp, both of Miami, Fla., and John D. McCall, of Dallas, Tex., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from page 416 intentionally omitted]
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kelley v. City of Atlantic City

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 722
Kelley v. City of Atlantic City
Messrs. Martin Conboy, of New York City, and Harold E. Stonebraker, of Rochester, N. Y., for petitioners.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kelley v. City of Atlantic City/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 722
Kelley v. City of Atlantic City
For opinion below, see 89 F.(2d) 659.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kelley v. Gill

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
245 U.S. 116
Kelley v. Gill
Argued: Oct. 2, 1917. --- Decided: Nov 5, 1917
[Syllabus from 116-117 intentionally omitted]
Mr. William B. Ogden, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Mr. William Ona Morton, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS, delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Journal of Discourses/Volume 4

(Online document scan of Journal of Discourses, Volume 4)
Journal of Discourses Volume 4
BY: BRIGHAM YOUNG President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
HIS TWO COUNSELLORS, AND THE TWELVE APOSTLES
REPORTED BY G. D. WATT,
AND HUMBLY DEDICATED TO THE LATTER-DAY SAINTS IN ALL THE WORLD
VOL. IV.
LIVERPOOL
EDITED AND PUBLISHED BY S. W. RICHARDS, 42, ISLINGTON.
LONDON:
LATTER-DAY SAINTS' BOOK DEPOT, 35 JEWIN STREET, CITY.
1857
Preface
We have the satisfaction of offering to the Saints and the public the Fourth Volume of the Journal of Discourses.
It would be altogether gratuitous and uncalled-for, on our part, to write a commendatory preface to the Discourses of the First Presidency and Twelve Apostles of this Church. To the Saints their words are as the words of God, their teachings fraught with heavenly wisdom, and their directions leading to salvation and eternal lives.
We believe that the present Volume is the most important of any yet placed in the hands of the Saints. It contains Discourses, Remarks, and Exhortations, delivered at the time of the great Reformation among the Saints in Zion. It shows the noble and mighty efforts of the authorities to purify the children of Zion, and prepare them for the great day of redemption. It is the written embodiment of the fire of the Almighty that burned in His Prophets and Apostles at that momentous epoch in the history of the Latter-day Church. The influence of that Reformation was felt by heaven, earth, and hell. It called down power and blessings from the celestial world to rest upon the Anointed Ones. It strengthened the union of the Saints, and added brightness to their faith. It made Satan and his hosts rage and tremble.
Besides those delivered at the Reformation, the Fourth Volume contains Discourses and Remarks full of new ideas, improved schemes relative to emigration and other matters, and counsel and instructions suitable to the advanced and peculiar conditon of the people, and the development of the work of the last days. Moreover, throughout the whole Volume, we see signs that the day of God's power is at hand, and that the fire of the Almighty is proceeding forth from the leaders of Israel.
To complete the present Volume, we have been under the necessity of introducing Discourses reported by J. V. Long, which are distinguished in the Index by an asterisk (*).
THE PUBLISHER.
* Application of the Words of Helaman to the Condition of the Latter-day Saints by Heber C. Kimball (45-49)
* Rebuking Iniquity by Jedediah M. Grant (49-51)
# King v. Mullins

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
171 U.S. 404
King v. Mullins
Maynard F. Stiles, for plaintiff in error.
J. H. Ferguson, W. E. Chilton, Z. T. Vinson, and Holmes Conrad, for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
333 U.S. 153
King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America
Argued: Dec. 10, 11, 1947. --- Decided: March 8, 1948
Messrs. Harvey W. Johnson and Jesse W. Boyd, both of Spartanburg, S.C., for petitioner.
Messrs. C. F. Haynsworth, of Greenville, S.C., and E. W. Dillon, of Columbus, Ohio, for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice VINSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# King v. Portland

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
184 U.S. 61
King v. Portland
Argued: November 18, 19, 1901. --- Decided: January 27, 1902
Messrs. Martin L. Pipes and Arthur P. Tifft for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Joel M. Long, Fred A. Mulkey, and R. S. Duniway for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# King v. Pardee

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
96 U.S. 90
King v. Pardee
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. George W. Biddle for the defendant in error.
No counsel appeared for the plaintiffs in error.
MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# King v. Panther Lumber Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
171 U.S. 437
King v. Panther Lumber Company
Maynard F. Stiles, for appellant.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# King v. Panther Lumber Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
171 U.S. 437
King v. Panther Lumber Company
This was a suit in equity by the appellant, a citizen of New York, against the appellee, a corporation of West Virginia, and one Kroll, a citizen of the latter state. Its object was to obtain a decree enjoining the defendant from cutting and removing timber from a certain tract of land in West Virginia, of which the plaintiff, King, claimed to be the owner.
The defendant corporation denied the plaintiff's ownership of the land, and asserted title in itself.
The land in dispute is a part of a tract purporting to contain 500,000 acres, and which was patented in 1793 by the commonwealth of Virginia to Robert Morris, assignee of Wilson Cary Nicholas. It is the same patent which is referred to in the opinion in King v. Mullins (just decided) 18 Sup. Ct. 925.
It appeared from the pleadings and exhibits in the cause that the lands in controversy were not entered upon the proper land books for taxation, or charged with taxes, for any year from 1883 to 1895, inclusive.
The final order in the cause was in these words: 'It having been held by this court in the case of H. C. King v. M. B. Mullins et als., recently tried in this court, the honorable circuit judge presiding, that such omission of said land from the land books operated to forfeit and devest the title to said tract of land, and vests the same absolutely in the state of West Virginia, under the provisions of the constitution of said state, before the purchase of the same by complainant, and that, thr efore, complainant has no title to said land, the court is of the opinion to dissolve said injunction, reserving the right to render and file herein an opinion in writing upon said motion. It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the said injunction be, and the same is hereby, dissolved, and that the said bills be dismissed, and that the defendants recover of the complainant their costs.'
The controlling questions in this case are the same as those decided in the case of King v. Mullins. For the reasons therein given, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Knight v. Paxton

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
124 U.S. 552
Knight v. Paxton
Geo. L. Paddock, for appellant.
L. H. Boutell, for appellee.
FIELD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Knight of St. John

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Knight of St. John."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* The Knight of St. John, a novel by Anna Maria Porter
* "The Knight of St. John", a poem by John Greenleaf Whittier
# Knight of Elle

* Knight of Elle (1)
* Knight of Elle (2)
* Knight of Elle (3)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kosrae State Code/Title 18

* Chapter 1: General Provisions
* Chapter 2: Administration
* Chapter 3: Hiring and Promotion of Employees
* Chapter 4: Employee Rights
* Chapter 5: Discipline
* Chapter 6: Compensation
* Chapter 7: Early Retirement Program
# Kosrae State Code/Title 16

* Part I: Family
** Chapter 1: Marriage
** Chapter 2: Wills
** Chapter 3: Support
* Part II: Minors
** Chapter 11: Provisions of General Applicability
** Chapter 12: Child Abuse
# Kosrae State Code/Title 2/Chapter 3

* Section 2.301: Petition.
* Section 2.302: Subsequent petition.
* Section 2.303: Amendment.
* Section 2.304: Convening of Legislature.
* Section 2.305: Probability; notification.
* Section 2.306: Impeached official's status.
* Section 2.307: Prosecutor.
* Section 2.308: Impeached official's counsel.
* Section 2.309: Trial.
* Section 2.310: Vote.
# Kosrae State Code/Title 2/Chapter 1

* Section 2.101: Oath of office.
* Section 2.102: Administration of oath.
* Section 2.103: Oath ceremony.
* Section 2.104: Affirmation.
* Section 2.105: Irregularity.
# Kosrae State Code/Title 2

* Chapter 1: Oath of Office
* Chapter 2: Seat of Government
* Chapter 3: Impeachment
* Chapter 4: Regulations
* Chapter 5: Holidays
* Chapter 6: Permits and Licenses
* Chapter 7: State Anthem
* Chapter 8: State Bird
# Kosrae State Code/Title 2/Chapter 4

* Section 2.401: Effect of law.
* Section 2.402: Power to regulate.
* Section 2.403: Effectiveness.
* Section 2.404: Former regulations.
* Section 2.405: Compilation, inspection and reproduction of regulations.
* Section 2.406: Adoption; amendment; repeal.
* Section 2.407: Declaratory ruling.
# Kosrae State Code/Title 17

* Part I: Vehicles and Road Safety
** Chapter 1: Provisions of General Applicability
** Chapter 2: Registration of Motor Vehicles
** Chapter 3: Licensing
** Chapter 4: Equipment
* Part II: Law Enforcement
** Chapter 11: Arrest, Search, and Seizure
** Chapter 12: Extradition
** Chapter 13: Office of the Attorney General
** Chapter 14: Inter-government Enforcement
# Kosrae State Code/Title 19

* Chapter 1: General Provisions
* Chapter 2: Permits
* Chapter 3: Registration & Required Equipment
* Chapter 4: Prohibited Acts
* Chapter 5: Monitoring, Control and Surveillance
* Chapter 6: Administrative Enforcement Proceedings
* Chapter 7: Civil Remedies
* Chapter 8: Forfeiture of Property
# Landon in The Literary Gazette 1820

This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
This work is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.
The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of their rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law. You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
Landon in The Literary Gazette 1820
Poems in The London Literary Gazette during the year 1820 by Letitia Elizabeth Landon (as L.)
compiled by Peter J. Bolton
| 11th March 1820 | Rome |
| 18th March 1820 | The Michaelmas Daisy |
| 29th July 1820 | Acknowledgement |
| 5th August 1820 | Jeu d'esprit - A West Indian Anecdote |
| 26th August 1820 | Fragment (Is not this grove) |
| 21st October 1820 | Vaucluse |
| 21st October 1820 | Untitled - The bee, when varying flowers are nigh |
# Landon in The Literary Gazette 1820/Fragment—Is not this grove

William Jerdan called this the germ of the future L. E. L., a highly artificial construct that represents one of the earliest examples of Post-Romantic poetry.
Literary Gazette, 26th August, 1820, Pages 556-557
[by Correspondents.]
FRAGMENT.
Is not this grove
A scene of pensive loveliness—the gleam
Of Dian's gentle ray falls on the trees,
And piercing thro’ the gloom, seems like the smile
That pity gives to cheer the brow of grief:
The turf has caught a silvery hue of light
Broken by shadows, where'er the branching oak
Rears its dark shade, or where the aspen waves
Its trembling leaves. The breeze is murmuring by
Fraught with sweet sighs of flowers and the song
Of sorrow, that the nightingale pours forth,
Like the soft dirge of love.
There is oft told
A melancholy record of this grove—
It was time once the haunt of young affection—
And now seems hallowed by the tender vows
That erst were breathed here.
Sad is the tale
That tells of blighted feelings, hopes destroyed;
But love is like the rose, so many ills
Assail it in the bud—the cankering blast,
The frost of winter and the summer storm,
All bow it down; rarely the blossom comes To full maturity; but there is nought
Sinks with so chill a breath as Faithlessness,—
As she could tell whose loveliness yet lives
In village legends. Often, at this hour
Of lonely beauty, would she list the tale
Of tenderness, and hearken to the vows
Of one more dear than life unto her soul:
He twined him round a heart which beat with all
The deep devotedness of early love—
Then left her, careless of the passion which
He had awakened into wretchedness:
The blight which withered all the blossoms love
Had fondly cherish'd, wither'd to the heart
Which gave them birth. Her sorrow had no voice,
Save in her faded beauty; for she looked
A melancholy broken-hearted girl.
She was so changed, the soft carnation cloud
Once mantling o'er her cheek like that which eve
Hangs o'er the sky, glowing with roseate hue
Had faded into paleness, broken by
Bright burning blushes, torches of the tomb.
There was such sadness, even in her smiles,
And such a look of utter hopelessness
Dwelt in her soft blue eye—a form so frail,
So delicate, scarce like a thing of earth—
‘Twas sad to gaze upon a brow so fair,
And see it traced with such a tale of woe—
To think that one so young and beautiful
Was wasting to the grave. ​ Within yon bower,
Of honey suckle and the snowy wealth
The mountain ash puts forth to welcome spring,
Her form was found reclined upon a bank,
Where nature's sweet unnurtur'd children bloom.
One white arm lay beneath her drooping head,
While her bright tresses twin‘d their sunny wreath
Around the polish’d ivory; there was not
A tinge of colour mantling o’er her lovely face;
’Twas like to marble, where the sculptor's skill
Has traced each charm of beauty but the blush.
Serenity so sweet sat on her brow;
So soft a smile yet hover'd on her lips,
At first they thought 'twas sleep—and sleep it was—
The cold long rest of death.
L.
# Landon in The Literary Gazette 1820/Rome

Landon's first published poem
Literary Gazette, 11th March, 1820, Page 173
[By Correspondents.]
ROME.
Oh! how thou art changed, thou proud daughter of fame,
Since that hour of ripe glory, when empire was thine,
When earth's purple rulers, kings, quailed at thy name,
And thy capitol worshipped as Liberty's shrine.
In the day of thy pride, when thy crest was untamed,
And the red star of conquest was bright on thy path.
When the meteor of death thy stern falchion's edge flamed,
And earth trembled when burst the dark storm of thy wrath.
But Rome thou art fallen! the memory of yore,
Only serves to reproach thee with what thou art now:
The joy of thy triumph for ever is o'er,
And sorrow and shame set their seal on thy brow.
Like the wind shaken reed, thy degenerate race,
The children of those once the brave and the free—
Ah, who can the page of thy history trace,
Nor blush, thou lost city, blush deeply for thee!
Could the graves yield their dead, and thy warriors arise,
And see thy blades rusted, thy war banners furl’d, Would they know the proud eagle that soared thro' the skies,
Whose glance lightened over a terror struck world?
Yet e'en in disgrace, in thy sadness and gloom,
An halo of splendour is over thee cast:
It is but the death-light that reddens the tomb,
And calls to remembrance the glories long past.
L.
# Landon in The Improvisatrice; and Other Poems/Violet

THE VIOLET.
Violets!—deep-blue Violets! April's loveliest coronets! There are no flowers grow in the vale, Kiss'd by the dew, wooed by the gale,— None by the dew of the twilight wet, So sweet as the deep-blue Violet! I do remember how sweet a breath Came with the azure light of a wreath That hung round the wild harp's golden chords, Which rang to my dark-eyed lover's words.
I have seen that dear harp rolled With gems of the East and bands of gold; But it never was sweeter than when set With leaves of the deep-blue Violet! And when the grave shall open for me,— I care not how soon that time may be,— Never a rose shall grow on that tomb, It breathes too much of hope and of bloom;— But there be that flower's meek regret, The bending and deep-blue Violet!
# Landon in The Literary Gazette 1820/Contents

​Contents:
| 1 | 11th March 1820 | Rome |
| 2 | 18th March 1820 | The Michaelmas Daisy |
| 3 | 29th July 1820 | Jeu d'esprit |
| 4 | 26th August 1820 | Fragment (Is not this grove) |
| 6 | 21st October 1820 | Vaucluse |
| 7 | 21st October 1820 | Untitled - The bee, when varying flowers are nigh |
# Landon in The Literary Gazette 1820/Header

Poems in The London Literary Gazette during the year 1820 by Letitia Elizabeth Landon (as L.) compiled by Peter J. Bolton
Revised edition
# Landon in The Literary Gazette 1820/Jeu d'esprit

​In his autobiography, William Jerdan, writing of the beginnings of Letitia Landon’s writing career, comments 'A temporary absence afforded the muse a season to reflect on friendly criticism and dogmatic rules, till August furnished a passing jeu d’esprit at its commencement' (in the week before a short acknowledgement of his coaching assistance was included)—
Literary Gazette, 29th July, 1820, Page 492 Acknowledgement
On a certain Lecturer on Poetry.
Both kinds of style our lecturer is engrossing; Verse is his matter, and his manner prosing.
Literary Gazette, 5th August, 1820, Page 507 Jeu-d'Esprit
A West Indian Anecdote, versified.
A West Indian dandy (not Bond Street alone
Can claim the dear exquisite thing as its own)
Stood fix'd by the glass, while the new suit displays
All its charms of stiff collars, short waists, and tight stays.—
"Don't I look very well?" (here the mirror was eyed)—
"Massa look like a lion," a Negro replied.
"Where have you seen a lion?"—"Oh me see it each day—
Ah! there's its long ears—it is coming this way."
One moment the beau turn'd away from the glass,
Look'd back—and beheld his resemblance an Ass.
L.
# Landon in The Literary Gazette 1820/The Bee

This poem appears at the end of The Fate of Adelaide and other Poems as 'Addressed to —'
Literary Gazette, 21st October, 1820, Page 685
Untitled
The bee, when varying flowers are nigh,
On many a sweet will careless dwell;
Just sips their dew, and then will fly
Again to its own fragrant cell:—
Thus tho’ my heart, by fancy led,
A wanderer for a while may be,
Yet soon returning whence it fled,
It comes more fondly back to thee. L.