OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Federal Housing Administration v. Darlington

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
358 U.S. 84
Federal Housing Administration v. Darlington
Argued: Oct. 13, 1958. --- Decided: Nov 24, 1958
See 358 U.S. 937, 79 S.Ct. 310.
Mr. Alan S. Rosenthal, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Mr. J. C. Long, Charleston, S.C., for appellee.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Crop Insurance Corporation v. Merrill

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
332 U.S. 380
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation v. Merrill
Argued: Oct. 16, 1947. --- Decided: Nov 10, 1947
Mr. Harry I. Rand, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
A. A. Merrill, of Idaho Falls, Idaho, for respondents.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
Note: This is the original legislation as it was initially enacted. Any subsequent amendments hosted on Wikisource may be listed using What Links Here.
An Act To prohibit the movement in interstate commerce of adulterated and misbranded food, drugs, devices, and cosmetics, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

### SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act´´.
Approved June 25, 1938.

## Legislative History

This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Housing Administration v. Burr

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
309 U.S. 242
Federal Housing Administration v. Burr
Argued: Jan. 31, 1940. --- Decided: Feb 12, 1940
Messrs. Robert H. Jackson, Atty. Gen., and Sidney J. Kaplan, of New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Gus O. Nations, of St. Louis, Mo., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Maritime Board v. Isbrandtsen Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinions

    Frankfurter
    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
356 U.S. 481
Federal Maritime Board v. Isbrandtsen Company
Argued: Dec. 11, 1957. --- Decided: May 19, 1958
Mr. Warner W. Gardner, Washington, D.C., for the Federal Maritime board.
Mr. Elkan Turk, New York City, for petitioners Japan-Atlantic and Gulf Freight Conference and others.
Mr. John J. O'Connor, Washington, D.C., for respondent Isbrandtsen Company, Inc.
Mr. Philip Elman, Washington, D.C., for respondents United States and Secretary of Agriculture.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Land Bank of Wichita v. Board of County Commissioners of Kiowa County, Kansas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
368 U.S. 146
Federal Land Bank of Wichita v. Board of County Commissioners of Kiowa County, Kansas
Argued: Oct. 16, 1961. --- Decided: Dec 11, 1961
J. William Doolittle, for the petitioner.
Robert C. Londerholm, Kansas City, Mo., for the respondents.
Mr. Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
314 U.S. 95
Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Company
Argued: Oct. 23, 1941. --- Decided: Nov 10, 1941
Messrs. Francis Biddle, Atty. Gen., and Warner W. Gardner, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. P. O. Sathre, of Bismarck, N.D., for respondents.
Mr. Justice MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Land Bank of Wichita v. Board of County Commissioners of Kiowa County, Kansas/Concurrence Black

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Black
United States Supreme Court
368 U.S. 146
Federal Land Bank of Wichita v. Board of County Commissioners of Kiowa County, Kansas
Argued: Oct. 16, 1961. --- Decided: Dec 11, 1961
Mr. Justice BLACK concurs in the result.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Land Bank of St. Louis v. Briddy

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
295 U.S. 229
Federal Land Bank of St. Louis v. Briddy
Argued: April 5, 1935. --- Decided: April 29, 1935
Messrs. Peyton R. Evans of Washington, D.C., and Scott W. Hovey, of Kansas City, Mo., for petitioner.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Joins

United States Supreme Court
191 U.S. 93
Ex parte Joins
No. 12, Original - Argued: and submitted October 19, 1903. --- Decided: November 9, 1903.
Messrs. Calvin L. Herbert and William I. Cruce for petitioner.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Kumezo Kawato

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
317 U.S. 69
Ex parte Kumezo Kawato
Argued: and Submitted Oct. 12, 1942. --- Decided: Nov 9, 1942
Mr. Kumezo Kawato, pro se.
Mr. Lasher B. Gallagher, of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Karstendick

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
93 U.S. 396
Ex parte Karstendick
PETITION for habeas corpus.
Mr. David C. Labatt for the petitioner.
Mr. Solicitor-General Phillips, contra.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Jordan/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
94 U.S. 248
Ex parte Jordan
We think that an appeal should have been allowed in this case. The petitioners were defendants in the suit when the final decree was rendered. They were directly interested in what was then decided. The allowance of an appeal under sect. 692, Rev. Stat., follows of course, if prayed for by one who has the right to it. The language of the statute is, 'shall be allowed,' which means 'must be allowed,' when asked for by one who stands in such relation to the cause that he can demand it. The question upon such an application is not what will be gained by an appeal, but whether the party asking it can appeal at all.
It is true that the petitioners were not parties to the suit until after the bill was taken as confessed; but it is clear that a decree pro confesso did not end the case, because before the final decree was rendered it was found necessary to have a reference to a master, 'to compute, ascertain, and report.' Before the master could comply with this order proof had to be taken; and the original time given him to report was extended for that purpose. When this reference was made, the petitioners were defendants and actors in respect to the litigation. They certainly had the right to contend before the master, and to except to his report. This they did; and their exceptions were overruled. Even the report of the master did not put the case in a condition for a final decree. The amount due upon the bonds and coupons had still to be ascertained. That was done by the court, and stated in the decree. Against these findings, certainly, the petitioners were in a condition to contend, and, if to contend below, to appeal here. It will be time enough to consider what relief they can have under their appeal when the case comes up.
While complaint is made of interlocutory orders entered in the progress of the cause, the appeal lies and was asked only from the final decree. Whatever comes here comes through such an appeal. When the case gets here, the petitioners may not be allowed to go behind orders actually made by the court as to the administration of the property before they were admitted to defend, but the case was certainly open to them, when they came in, as to all other matters involved.
The exceptions of the petitioners were not filed until after the expiration of one month from the time of filing the master's report. Under equity rule 83 the complainants could have insisted upon a confirmation of the report by reason of this default at the next rule-day after it occurred. But they did not see fit to do so. The exceptions were received out of time without objection, and acted upon by the court. This was a waiver of the default.
A writ of mandamus will be issued directing the Circuit Court to allow the appeal asked for, as of Oct. 2, 1876, and it is so Ordered.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Giovanni Animuccia

See also Giovanni Animuccia on Wikipedia, Giovanni Animuccia in the 11th Edition; and the disclaimer.
​ANIMUCCIA, Giovanni, musical composer, was born at Florence in the last years of the 15th century. At the request of St Filippo Neri he composed a number of Laudi, or hymns of praise, to be sung after sermon, which are noteworthy as furnishing the rudimentary form out of which the Oratorio was developed. In 1555 he was appointed “maestro di capello” at St Peter's, an office which he held until his death in 1571. He was succeeded by the more celebrated Palestrina, who had been his friend and probably his pupil. It is impossible to say to what stage Animuccia brought the oratorio form, as no specimens of his laudi are now extant. The manuscript of many of his other compositions is still preserved in the Vatican Library. His chief published works were Madrigali e Motetti a quattro e cinque voci (Ven. 1548) and Il primo Libra di Messe (Rom. 1567). From the latter Padre Martini has taken two specimens for his Saggio di Contrapunto. Paolo Animuccia, a brother of Giovanni, was also celebrated as a composer.
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Gough

See also Gough (disambiguation) on Wikipedia; and the disclaimer.
In the 9th edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica, Gough may refer to:
* Hugh Gough, Viscount Gough, a British marshal, or
* Richard Gough, an English antiquary.
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Giovanni Vincenzo Gravina

See also Giovanni Vincenzo Gravina on Wikipedia; Giovanni Vincenzo Gravina on Wikipedia, Gravina in the 11th edition; and the disclaimer.
GRAVINA, Giovanni Vincenzo (1664-1718), an Italian litterateur and jurisconsult, was born at Roggiano, a small town near Cosenza in Calabria, January 20, 1664. He was descended from a distinguished family, and under the direction of his maternal uncle, Gregorio Caloprese, who possessed some reputation as a poet and philosopher, received a learned education, after which he studied at Naples civil and canon law. In 1689 he came to Rome, where in 1695 he united with several others of literary tastes in forming the Academy of Arcadians. A schism occurred in the academy in 1711, and Gravina and his followers founded in opposition to it the Academy of Quirina. From Innocent XII. Gravina received the offer of various ecclesiastical honours, but declined them from a, disinclination to enter the clerical profession. In 1699 he was appointed to the chair of civil law in the college of La Sapienza, and in 1703 he was transferred to the chair of canon law. He died at Rome January 6, 1718. He was the adoptive father of Metastasio.
Gravina is the author of a number of works of great erudition, the principal being his Origines Juris Civilis, completed in 3 vols. in 1713, and his De Romano Imperio, 1712. A French translation of the former appeared in 1775, of which a second edition was published in 1822. His collected works were published at Leipsic in 1737, and at Naples, with notes by Mascovius, in 1756.
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Giulio Clovio

See also Giulio Clovio on Wikipedia; Giulio Clovio at Wikipedia; Giorgio Giulio Clovio in the 11th Edition; and the disclaimer.
CLOVIO, Giulio (1498-1578), by birth a Croat and by profession a priest, is said to have learned the elements of design in his own country, and to have studied after wards with intense diligence at Rome under Giulio Romano, and at Verona under Girolamo de Libri. He excelled in historical pieces and portraits, painting as for microscopical examination, and yet contriving to handle his subjects with great force and precision. In the Vatican library is preserved a MS. life of Frederick, duke of Urbino, superbly illustrated by Clovio, who is facile princeps among Italian miniaturists.
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Gottschalk

See also Gottschalk of Orbais on Wikipedia; Gottschalk of Orbais on Wikipedia; Gottschalk in the 11th Edition; and the disclaimer.
The story of Gottschalk has been told with great fulness by Neander and Gieseler. See also Gfrörer's Untersuchung über Alter, Ursprung, und Zweck der Dekretalen des falschen Isidorus, 1848.
# Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition/Giovanni Rinaldo, Count of Carli

See also Gian Rinaldo Carli on Wikipedia; Gian Rinaldo Carli at Wikipedia; Giovanni Rinaldo, Count of Carli-Rubbi, in the 11th Edition; and the disclaimer.
and economics, was born at Capo d'Istria, in 1720. He was early distinguished for the extent and variety of his acquirements, and at the age of twenty-four was ap pointed by the senate of Venice to the newly-established professorship of astronomy and navigation in the University of Padua, and intrusted with the superintendence of the Venetian marine. After filling these offices for seven years with great credit, he resigned them, in order to devote himself to the study of antiquities and political economy. His principal economic works are his Delle Alonete, e della Instituzione delle Zecche d Italia ; his Ragionamento sopra i Bilanci economid delle Nazioni (1759), in which he main tained that what is termed the balance of trade between two nations is no criterion of the prosperity of either, since both may be gainers by their reciprocal transactions ; and his Sul libei-o Commercio dei Grani (1771), in which he argues that free trade in corn is not always advisable.
# Ferishtah's Fancies/Epilogue

EPILOGUE.
Palazzo Giustinian-Recanati, Venice:
December 1, 1883.
Spottiswoode & Co., Printers, New-street Square, London.
# Ferishtah's Fancies/Prologue

PROLOGUE.
Maison Delapierre,
Gressoney St. Jean, Val d' Aosta.
September 12, '83.
# Ferishtah's Fancies/The Family

4. THE FAMILY.
# Ferishtah's Fancies/Mihrab Shah

6. MIHRAB SHAH.
# Ferishtah's Fancies/Plot-Culture

10. PLOT-CULTURE.
# Ferishtah's Fancies/Shah Abbas

3. SHAH ABBAS.
# Ferishtah's Fancies/The Melon-Seller

2. THE MELON-SELLER.
# Ferishtah's Fancies/The Sun

5. THE SUN.
# Ferishtah's Fancies/Two Camels

8. TWO CAMELS.
# Farmers' Loan Trust v. Waterman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
106 U.S. 265
Farmers' Loan Trust v. Waterman
J. D. Campbell, for the purchasers.
John M. Butler, for appellees.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Farmers' Merchants' Bank of Monroe v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Va

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
262 U.S. 649
Farmers' Merchants' Bank of Monroe v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Va
Argued: April 30 and May 1, 1923. --- Decided: June 11, 1923
[Syllabus from pages 649-651 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. A. W. Smith, of Atlanta, Ga., and John J. Parker, of Charlotte, N. C., for petitioners.
Mr. Henry W. Anderson, of Richmond, Va., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Farmers' Mechanics' National Bank v. Wilkinson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
266 U.S. 503
Farmers' Mechanics' National Bank v. Wilkinson
Submitted on Motion to Dismiss Oct. 6, 1924.
Decided Jan. 5, 1925.
Mr. Mark McMahon, of Fort Worth, Tex., for appellee.
Mr. Charles A. Boynton, of Waco, Tex., for appellant.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Farmers' Loan Trust Company v. Minnesota

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
280 U.S. 204
Farmers' Loan Trust Company v. Minnesota
Argued: Oct. 30, 1929. --- Decided: Jan 6, 1930
Messrs. Cleon Headly and George W. Morgan, both of St. Paul, Minn., for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from page 205 intentionally omitted]
Mr. G. A. Youngquist, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 206-207 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Flirt

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Flirt."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* The Flirt (19th century), a novel by Mrs. Grey
* "The Flirt" (1873), a song by Jean Paul
* The Flirt (1913), a novel by Booth Tarkington
# Floating City (1904)/Blockade Runners 10

CHAPTER X.
ST. MUNGO.
The next day at sunrise the American coast had disappeared; not a ship was visible on the horizon, and the "Dolphin," moderating the frightful rapidity of her speed, made quietly towards the Bermudas.
It is useless to recount the passage across the Atlantic, which was marked by no accidents, and ten days after the departure from Queenstown the French coast was hailed.
What passed between the Captain and the young girl may be imagined even by the least observant individuals. How could Mr. Halliburtt acknowledge the devotion and courage of his deliverer, if it was not by making him the happiest of men? James Playfair did not wait for English seas to declare to the father and daughter the sentiments which overflowed his heart, and, if Crockston is to be believed, Miss Jenny received his confession with a happiness she did not try to conceal.
​Thus it happened that on the 14th of February, 18—, a numerous crowd was collected in the dim aisles of St. Mungo, the old cathedral of Glasgow. There were seamen, merchants, manufacturers, magistrates, and some of every denomination, gathered here. There was Miss Jenny in bridal array, and beside her the worthy Crockston, resplendent in apple-green clothes, with gold buttons, whilst Uncle Vincent stood proudly by his nephew.
In short, they were celebrating the marriage of James Playfair, of the firm of Vincent Playfair and Co., of Glasgow, with Miss Jenny Halliburtt, of Boston.
The ceremony was accomplished amidst great pomp. Every one knew the history of the "Dolphin," and every one thought the young Captain well recompensed for his devotion. He alone said that his reward was greater than he deserved.
In the evening there was a grand ball and banquet at Uncle Vincent's house, with a large distribution of shillings to the crowd collected in Gordon Street. Crockston did ample justice to this memorable feast, while keeping himself perfectly within bounds.
Every one was happy at this wedding; some at their own happiness, and others at the happiness around them, which is not always the case at ceremonies of this kind.
Late in the evening, when the guests had retired, James Playfair took his uncle's hand.
​"Well, Uncle Vincent," said he to him.
"Well, Nephew James?"
"Are you pleased with the charming cargo I brought you on board the 'Dolphin'?" continued Captain Playfair, showing him his brave young wife.
"I am quite satisfied," replied the worthy merchant; "I have sold my cotton at three hundred and seventy-five per cent. profit."
THE END.
"WELL, UNCLE VINCENT."
Page 286.