OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Codlin v. Kohlhausen/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
181 U.S. 151
Codlin v. Kohlhausen
Argued: and Submitted April 11, 1901. --- Decided: April 15, 1901
Mr. R. E. Twitchell submitted the case for appellants.
Mr. Andrieus A. Jones for appellees.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE: This was a petition filed by appellees in the district court for Colfax county, New Mexico, praying for a writ of mandamus directed to Codlin, chairman, and Salazar, clerk, of the board of county commissioners of the county of Colfax, commanding them to officially sign and execute certain bonds and deliver them to the designated agent of the county for sale, for the construction of a courthouse and jail.
The alternative writ of mandamus was issued and due return made, whereupon, and after hearing, the district court ordered the peremptory writ to issue, which was done, and the writ served, October 23, 1897.
The case was carried on error to the supreme court of the territory in June, 1898, and it appears from an affidavit in that court that the mandate of the district court was obeyed and the bonds issued and sold; and from an affidavit in this court, that the proceeds were used in the construction of the courthouse and jail, which were completed on or about January 1, 1899. That affidavit also states that Codlin ceased to be chairman or a member of the board of county commissioners in January, 1899, and that Salazar ceased to be cherk during or prior to March, 1899.
The territorial supreme court affirmed the judgment of the district court August 28, 1899. 9 N. M. 565, 58 Pac. 499. An appeal from the judgment of affirmance to this court was allowed January 2, 1900, and the record filed here March 28.
We think the cause comes within the rule applied in Mills v. Green, 159 U.S. 653, 40 L. ed. 293, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 132, and cases cited, and the order must be—
Appeal dismissed without costs to either party.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Coffee v. Groover

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
123 U.S. 1
Coffee v. Groover
Page 2 Angus Paterson, for plaintiff in error.
C. W. Stevens, for defendant in error.
BRADLEY, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Compania General De Tabacos De Filipinas v. Collector of Internal Revenue (279 U.S. 306)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
279 U.S. 306
Compania General De Tabacos De Filipinas v. Collector of Internal Revenue (279 U.S. 306)
Argued: March 1, 1929. --- Decided: April 8, 1929
Messrs. Lawrence H. Cake, of Washington, D. C., and Clyde A. De Witt, and E. Arthur Perkins, both of Manila, Philippine Islands, for petitioner.
Mr. Wm. Cattron Rigby, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Compania General De Tabacos De Filipinas v. Collector of Internal Revenue (275 U.S. 87)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
275 U.S. 87
Compania General De Tabacos De Filipinas v. Collector of Internal Revenue
Argued: and Submitted Oct. 18, 1927. --- Decided: Nov 21, 1927
Messrs. W. F. Williamson and B. M. Aikins, both of San Francisco, Cal., and Barry Mohun, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Mr. Wm. Cattron Rigby, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Company De Navegacion v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
275 U.S. 518
Company De Navegacion v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
and
Mr. John D. Grace, of New Orleans, La., for petitioner.
Mr. T. Catesby Jones, of New York City, for respondents.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Company De Navegacion v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
275 U.S. 518
Company De Navegacion v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
Petition for writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Compania General De Tabacos De Filipinas v. Alhambra Cigar & Cigarette Manufacturing Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
249 U.S. 72
Compania General De Tabacos De Filipinas v. Alhambra Cigar & Cigarette Manufacturing Company
Argued: Jan. 22, 1919. --- Decided: March 3, 1919
Mr. F. C. Fisher, of Manila, P. I., for appellant.
Mr. H. W. Van Dyke, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Mr. Justice DAY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Companion

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Companion."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "The Companion", a fairy tale by Hans Christian Anderson
* "The Companion", fairy tale by Peter Christen Asbjørnsen
* "The Companion", poem by Edwin Arlington Robinson
* "Companions", a poem by Alfred Percevel Graves
* "The Companions", a poem by Letitia Elizabeth Landon
* "Companion," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
periodicals using that name, including one started by James Henry Leigh Hunt

### See also

* Travelling Companion with its various forms
# Compania General De Tabacos De Filipinas v. Collector of Internal Revenue

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Compania General De Tabacos De Filipinas v. Collector of Internal Revenue."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Compania General De Tabacos De Filipinas v. Collector of Internal Revenue (275 U.S. 87)
* Compania General De Tabacos De Filipinas v. Collector of Internal Revenue (279 U.S. 306)
# Conall Yellowclaw

Also called Conall Cra Bhuidhe: Scottish fairy tale
* "Conall Cra Bhuidhe", in Joseph Campbell's Popular Tales of the West Highlands (1860).
* "Conall Yellowclaw", in Joseph Jacobs' Celtic Fairy Tales (1892).
# Conard v. The Atlantic Insurance Company New York

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
26 U.S. 386
Conard v. The Atlantic Insurance Company New York

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Conboy v. First National Bank of Jersey City

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
203 U.S. 141
Conboy v. First National Bank of Jersey City
Argued: October 23, 1906. --- Decided: November 19, 1906
Mr. Martin Conboy for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from page 142 intentionally omitted]
Mr. William G. Wilson for appellee.
Mr. Chief Justice Fuller delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Conard v. Nicoll

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
29 U.S. 291
Conard v. Nicoll

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Conard v. Pacific Insurance Company of New York

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
31 U.S. 262
Conard v. Pacific Insurance Company of New York

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Copyright Act 1968/Part 12

Layout 2
Part XII.—Regulations.
Regulations. 249. The Governor-General may make regulations, not inconsistent with this Act, prescribing all matters that are required or permitted by this Act to be prescribed or are necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to this Act and, in particular, prescribing penalties not exceeding a fine of One hundred dollars for offences against the regulations.
# Compendious Syriac Grammar/Translator's Prefatory Note

TRANSLATOR'S PREFATORY NOTE.
It appears desirable that the leading modern grammars of the four best-known Semitic languages, in their classical forms, should be readily accessible to English-speaking students. And in this connection, probably few competent judges will dispute the claims of the following treatises to be regarded as authoritative and leading, viz:—Wright's Arabic Grammar (as revised by Robertson Smith and De Goeje); Kautzsch's Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar; Nöldeke's Syriac Grammar; and Dillmann's Ethiopic Grammar. Of these the first two already exist in English, Wright's work having been in that form from the outset, at least under his own name, and Kautzsch's Gesenius' having been presented in a similar form a few years ago, in Collins and Cowley's excellent translation. The grammars of Nöldeke and Dillmann, however, have not hitherto appeared in English, although their pre-eminent position in their respective departments of Semitic philology is perhaps even less open to challenge, than that of the other two. It is to supply this want in the educational apparatus available for English students, so far at least as Noldeke's Grammar is concerned, that the present translation has been attempted.
Of course it may be said, that students of Syriac will in all liklihood be sufficiently well acquainted with German, to be able to consult the original for themselves. I trust that such is the case; but those students and scholars amongst us, who are most familiar with German, will probably be the first to welcome a translation of such a work, if only it has been executed with reasonable fidelity and care. There are obvious advantages in an English version for an English eye, however accomplished ​a linguist its owner may be. At all events it is in that belief, and with no other desire than to do something for this branch of study, that I have ventured upon the present edition.
No attempt has been made to alter in any way either the substance or the arrangement of the Grammar. Citations, it is true, have been again verified, and slight errors here and there have been tacitly corrected. To facilitate reference, not only has the very full Table of Contents been set in its usual place, but its items have also been applied throughout the book, in the form of rubrics to the several sections. With a similar design an Index of Passages, wanting in the original, has been drawn up and placed at the end of the volume.
Among other friends who have been helpful towards the preparation of this version, I have specially to thank Professor Robertson of Glasgow University, for much kindly encouragement and wise counsel. Above all I must express my deep indebtedness to the distinguished author himself, Professor Nöldeke, for the unfailing courtesy and unwearied patience with which he lent his invaluable guidance and assistance, as the proof-sheets passed through his hands. Thanks are also due to Herr W. Drugulin and his staff, for again encountering, with a very considerable measure of success, the typographical difficulties, which a work of this nature must present.
James A. Crichton.
# Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices

* Compendium I (1973)
* Compendium II (1984)
* Compendium III (2014):
** Compendium III (2014) (transcription project)
** Compendium III (2017) (start transcription)
** Compendium III (2021) (transcription project)
# Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices (3d ed. 2014)

​ United States Copyright Office
Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices
Third Edition
December 22, 2014
​ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
In releasing the Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices, Third Edition, the Register of Copyrights is indebted to the team of attorneys, registration specialists, and design experts who worked relentlessly and collaboratively with the Office of the Register to make it possible. Read more.
​Compendium
Table of Contents
| Introduction |
| Chapter 100 | U.S. Copyright Office and the Copyright Law: General Background |
| Chapter 200 | Overview of the Registration Process |
| Chapter 300 | Copyrightable Authorship: What Can be Registered |
| Chapter 400 | Who May File an Application |
| Chapter 500 | Identifying the Work(s) Covered by a Registration |
| Chapter 600 | Examination Practices |
| Chapter 700 | Literary Works |
| Chapter 800 | Works of the Performing Arts |
| Chapter 900 | Visual Art Works |
| Chapter 1000 | Websites and Website Content |
| Chapter 1100 | Registration for Multiple Works |
| Chapter 1200 | Mask Works |
| Chapter 1300 | Vessel Designs |
| Chapter 1400 | Applications and Filing Fees |
| Chapter 1500 | Deposits |
| Chapter 1600 | Preregistration |
| Chapter 1700 | Administrative Appeals |
| Chapter 1800 | Post-Registration Procedures |
| Chapter 1900 | Publication |
| Chapter 2000 | Foreign Works: Eligibility and GATT Registration |
| Chapter 2100 | Renewal Registration |
| Chapter 2200 | Notice of Copyright |
| Chapter 2300 | Recordation |
| Chapter 2400 | U.S. Copyright Office Services |
| Glossary |
| Table of Authorities |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Dictionary of Christian Biography and Literature to the End of the Sixth Century/Eusebius (126), eunuch under Constantius II

Eusebius (126), eunuch, and grand chamberlain under Constantius II. Socrates (ii. 2, 16) relates that, after the death of Constantine in 337, Eusebius of Nicomedia and Theognis of Nicaea, bestirring themselves on behalf of the Arians, made use of a certain presbyter in high favour with Constantius, who had before been instrumental in recalling Arius from exile. He persuaded Eusebius the head chamberlain to adopt Arian opinions, and the rest of the chamberlains followed, and prevailed on the empress also. In 359 Eusebius was the mainspring of the plan of Eudoxius and others for dividing the council to be held on the subject of Arianism, making the Western bishops sit at Rimini, the Eastern at Seleucia; part of those in the secret were to sit at each council, and try to gain over their opponents to Arian views. Laymen of influence favoured the plan in order to please the chamberlain (Soz. H. E. iv. 16). On the death of Constantius in 361 Eusebius tried to curry favour with Julian by assuring him of the loyalty of the East (Amm. xxi. 15, § 4); but was unable to avert what Ammianus and Philostorgius represent as the just reward of his deeds. One of the first acts of Julian was to condemn him to death (ib. xxii. 3, § 12). Ammianus describes him as the prime mover of all the court intrigues of his day, and sarcastically calls the emperor one of his favourites (ib. xviii. 4, § 33).
[W.M.S. AND M.F.A.]
# Dictionary of Christian Biography and Literature to the End of the Sixth Century/Eusebius (48), bp. of Laodicea

Eusebius (48), bp. of Laodicea, in Syria Prima; a native and deacon of Alexandria. In the persecution under Valerian, a.d. 257, when the venerable bp. Dionysius had been banished from Alexandria, Eusebius remained, ministering to those in prison and burying the martyrs, a faithful service gratefully commemorated in a letter of Dionysius (apud Eus: H. E. vii. 11). During the civil strife at the death of Valerian, when Alexandria was in revolt, a.d. 262, Aemilianus, who had assumed the purple, was driven into the strong quarter of the city called Bruchium, and besieged. Eusebius without, and his friend Anatolius within, the besieged quarter secured escape for all useless hands, including a large number of Christians, whom Eusebius received kindly, supplying them with food and medicine, and carefully tending the sick. To the synod of Antioch, a.d. 264, summoned to deal with Paul of Samosata, Dionysius bp. of Alexandria, being unable to be present through age, sent Eusebius as his representative. The see of Laodicea was then vacant, and the Laodiceans demanded Eusebius for their bishop, taking no refusal. As bp. of Laodicea he sat at the synod when Paul of Samosata was deposed, a.d. 270. He was succeeded by his old friend Anatolius. Eus. H. E. vii. 11, 32; Tillem. Mém. Eccl. iv. 304; Le Quien, Or. Christ. ii. 792; Neale, Patriarchate of Alex. i.77.
[E.V.]
# Dictionary of Christian Biography and Literature to the End of the Sixth Century/Eusebius (24), bp. of Caesarea

Eusebius (24), bp. of Caesarea in Cappadocia, by whom Basil the Great was ordained to the presbyterate. Eusebius was a layman, and unbaptized at the time of his elevation to the episcopate, A.D. 362. On the death of Dianius, the church of Caesarea was divided into two nearly equal factions, and the choice of a layman universally known and respected was the readiest way out of the dilemma. Military force had to be employed to overcome his reluctance and to compel the prelates to consecrate. No sooner were they free than the bishops endeavoured to declare their consecration of Eusebius void. But the counsels of the elder Gregory of Nazianzus prevailed (Greg. Naz. Orat. xix. 36, pp. 308, 309). Eusebius proved a very respectable prelate, but quite unequal to the circumstances of severe trial in which he soon found himself. One of the earliest acts of his episcopate was to ordain Basil priest. A coldness grew up between Eusebius and Basil, leading to Basil's three years' retirement to Pontus. [Basilius of Caesarea.] (Greg Naz. Orat. xx. §§ 51-53; Ep. 19, 20, 169, 170.) In 366 Basil returned to Caesarea. Each had learnt wisdom from the past (Greg. Naz. Orat. xx. §§ 57-59), and harmonious relations existed unbroken to the death of Eusebius, a.d. 370.
Fleury states that Eusebius is reckoned by some as a martyr (Fleury, xv. 13, 14; xvi. 9, 14, 17), but Usuard probably confounds Eusebius of Cappadocia with Eusebius the historian. See Papebrochius in AA. SS. Boll. Jun. iv. 75; and on the other side, Tillem. Mém. vii. 39. [Eusebius of Caesarea.]
[E.V.]
# Curtis's Botanical Magazine/Volume 73/4333

Tab. 4333.
EUCALYPTUS macrocarpa
Large-fruited Eucalyptus, or Gum-Tree.
Nat. Ord. Myrtaceæ. Icosandria monogynia.
Gen. Char. Calycis tubus persistens obovatus aut globosus cupulæformis, limbus operculiformis integer basi circumscisse et regulariter dehiscens deciduus. Petala nulla. Stamina: filamenta numerosa libera. Capsula 4-locularis aut abortiv. 3-locularis apice dehiscens polysperma.-Arbores (Novæ Hollandiæ) excelsæ. Folia itegerrima coriacea sepius alterna, rarius opposita, interdum in iisdem individuis varia, paucis exceptis glaberrima. Pedunculi axillares breves umbellam 3-15-floram 1 gerentes. Operculum in nonnullis, ex cl. Brown, duplex, exterius calycinum, interius corollinum. DC.
Eucalyptus macrocarpa ; tota pulverulento-glauca, foliis oppositis elliptico-cordatis coriaceis acuminulatis, peduinculis axillaribus solitariis brevissimis unfloris, calycis magni crassissimi operculo conico-hemisplærico acuminato, capsula mnax iia depresso-hemisphærica marginata liguosa 4–5-valvi.
Eucalyptus macrocarpa. Hook. Ic. PI. v. 5. tab. 405, 406, 407. Lel. Pl. Preiss. p. 132.
It is truly said in the 'Icones Plantarum' above quoted, that "one of the finest among the many fine plants lately sent by Mr. Jas. Drummond from the Swan River Colony, is the present new species of Eucalyptus." That was spoken of the dried specimen: with still greater truth does the remark apply to the living individual. Our specimen is about five feet high; and the large and copious foliage, covered everywhere with glaucous white powder, and the bright red flowers nestled among the leaves, form a very striking object. The colour of the flowers is due to the stamens alone; for petals (as in the genus) there are none, and the calyx falls off like the lid of a box. Drummond found it at "Guangan," an open sandy desert, commencing about eighty miles E.S.E of Freemantle and continuing for two hundred miles. This barren country is bordered by a considerable forest, consisting principally of two species of Eucalyptus, called by the aborigines "Urac" and "Morral": the latter is the plant now before us. The seed was raised at Kew in 1842,
​and our plant, when five feet high, in the summer of 1847, blossomed in great perfection.
Descr. A shrub, everywhere covered with a glaucous-white, pulverulent substance; young branches four-sided. Leaves numerous, opposite, large, three to four inches long, elliptical-ovate or cordate, sessile and half embracing the stem, coriaceous, acuminulate, margined, penninerved, the nerves very patent, rather crowded, parallel. Flowers axillary, solitary, nearly sessile. Calyx-tube subhemispherical, but tapering: the free portion united into a hemispherical acuminate lid, which separates transversely from the very thick tube. Stamens exceedingly numerous. Filaments long, subulate, rich deep red; the central ones spreading. Anthers yellow. Style subulate. Fruit (see Ic. Pl. f. 407) very large, orbicular, a depressed hemisphere, very woody, opening in the middle by four to five valves.
Fig. 1. Calyx-tube adherent with the ovary. 2. Operculum:–natural size.
​NOVEMBER 1ST, 1847.