OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Glasgow Peggy (1840s)/Glasgow Peggy

GLASGOW PEGGY
A BONNIE laddie brisk and gay, A handsome youth sae brisk and gaddie; And he is on to Glasgow town, To steal awa' his bonnie Peggy.
When he came into Glasgow town, Upon her father's green sao steady; "Come forth, come forth, old man," he says, “ For I am come for bonnie Peggy."
Out it spake her father then, "Begone from me, ye Highland laddie ; There's nane in a' the west country Dare steal from me my bonnie Peggy."
"I've ten young men all at my back, That ance to me were baith true and steady; If ance I call, they'll soon be nigh, And bring to me my bonnie Peggy."
Out it spake her mother then, Dear but sho spake wond'rous saucy; Says, "Ye may steal my cow or ewe, But I'll keep sight o' my ain lassie."
​"Hold your tongue, old woman," he says, "Ye think your wit it is fu' ready; For cow nor ewe I ever stole, But I will steal your bonnie Peggy."
Then all his men they boldly came, That was to him baith true and steady; And through the ha' they quickly went, And forth they carried bonnie Peggy.
Her father gae mony shout and cry, Her mother cursed the Highland laddie; But he heard them as he heard them not, But fix'd his eye on bonnie Peggy.
He set her on his milk-white steed, And he himsel' on his grey naigie, Still along the way they rode, And he's awa' wi' bonnie Peggy.
Says, "I would gi'e baith cow and ewe, And sae would I this tartan plaidie, That I was far into the north, And alang wi' me my bonnie Peggy."
As they rode down yon pleasant glen, For trees and brambles were right mony, There they met the Earl o' Hume, And his young son, were riding bonnie.
Then out it spake the young Earl Hume, Dear but he spake wondrous gaudie; "I'm wae to see sae fair a dame Riding alang wi' a Highland laddie."
​"Hold your tongue, ye young Earl Hume, O dear but you do speak right gaudie; There's nae a lord in a' the south, Dare e'er compete wi' a Highland laddie."
Then he rade five miles through the north, Through mony hills sae rough and scroggie, Till they came down to a low glen, And ho lay down wi' bonnie Peggy.
Then he enclosed her in his arms, And row'd her in his tartan plaidie; "There are blankets and sheets in my father's house, How havo I lien down wi'a Highland laddie!"
Says he, "There are sheep in my father's fauld, And every year their wool is ready; By the same our debts we pay, Although I be but a Highland laddie.
"Thero are fifty cows in my father's byre, That all are tyed to the stakes, and ready; Five thousand pounds I ha'e ilk year, Although I be but a Highland laddie.
"My father has fifty well shod horse, Besides your steed and my grey naigie; I'm Donald o' the Isle o' Sky, Why may not you be ca'd a lady?
"See ye not yon fino castle, On yonder hill that stands sae gaudie; And there we'll win this very night, Where ye'll enjoy your Highland laddie."
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Glasgow Peggy

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Glasgow Peggy."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Glasgow Peggy, Scottish chapbook
* Glasgow Peggy, Scottish folk song
# Glanzman v. Schaffer/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
357 U.S. 347
Glanzman v. Schaffer
The motion to dispense with the printing of the petition is granted. The motion to substitute Robert K. Christenberry, Acting Postmaster, New York, New York, as the party respondent in the place and stead of Robert H. Schaffer, resigned, is denied as untimely. Snyder v. Buck, 340 U.S. 15, 71 S.Ct. 93, 95 L.Ed. 15. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the complaint as abated.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Glasgow Advertiser

Content exists for this periodical, though at this stage it is not specifically organised beyond a basic hierarchy.
The pages listed below are an automatically generated listing.
Special:PrefixIndex/Glasgow Advertiser/
# Glasgow Advertiser/1792-08-13 - Richard Arkwright

Citation: Glasgow Advertiser (Glasgow, United Kingdom), 13 August 1792, available at the Scissors and Paste Database, http://www.scissorsandpaste.net/402.
On Friday died, at his seat at Cromford, the celebrated Sir Richard Arkwright, who introduced the spinning of cotton on Jennies. This gentleman was once a barber that shaved at a penny, but, by this abilities, raised himself to the state of immense opulence, and established the cotton manufacture, for which this country owes him the greatest obligation. It is said, that the profits of his works, for several years past, have amounted to forty thousand pounds a year.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Glasgow Herald/1899/John Ferguson Nisbet

Source: Glasgow Herald (Glasgow, Scotland), Saturday, April 1, 1899; p. 5; `Issue 78. — Our London Correspondence
LITERATURE
Mr John Ferguson Nisbet, the well-known author and journalist, died this afternoon in London. He had been in failing health for several months, and recently went to Malaga in Spain in the hope of getting rid of affection of the lungs; but the change did him little if any good. Mr Nisbet was a native of Lanarkshire, and received part of his education at Glasgow University. but he continued to be a student long after he left the north. During his journalistic and literary career in the Metropolis he acquired a thorough mastery of several European languages. In 1882 he became dramatic critic of the "Times", and displayed in this department of his work a somewhat rare independence of judgment, as well as full information on the various branches of the modern drama, for some years he was editor of the "Morning," and he wrote for the weekly newspapers, where again he gave evidence of extensive stores of information on subjects as wide as the Poles. In the midst of such an active life Mr Nisbet contrived by, by careful husbanding of his time, to devote perhaps his best energies to two or three graves works in literature; and it is no disparagement of his characteristic modesty and natural reserve to say that he hoped these compositions would prove to have some permanent value. I refer specially to the books entitled "Marriage and Heredity" and the "Insanity of Genius." To the later volume he gave countless unwearying hours, and if its leading conceptions cannot be universally accepted, no one will venture to deny the amazing detail disclosed in the book, and the enormous industry it must have cost its author. Mr Nisbet, I may add had another work ready. which is now in the press. He possessed a vigorous and compact style, that was frequently touched by the elegance and grace that come of a close acquaintance with the masters of French, Italian, and Spanish literature.
This work was published in 1899 and is anonymous or pseudonymous due to unknown authorship. It is in the public domain in the United States as well as countries and areas where the copyright terms of anonymous or pseudonymous works are 124 years or less since publication.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# From Poverty to Power/Part 1

The Path of Prosperity is Part I of From Poverty to Power.
Layout 2
# Green v. United States (356 U.S. 165)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Frankfurter

## Dissenting Opinions

    Black
    Brennan
United States Supreme Court
356 U.S. 165
Green v. United States (356 U.S. 165)
Argued: Oct. 21, 1957. --- Decided: March 31, 1958
[Syllabus from pages 165-166 intentionally omitted]
Mr. John J. Abt, New York City, for petitioners.
Mr. Ralph S. Spritzer, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Green v. Menominee Tribe of Indians in Wisconsin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
233 U.S. 558
Green v. Menominee Tribe of Indians in Wisconsin
Argued: March 13 and 16, 1914. --- Decided: May 11, 1914
Messrs. L. T. Michener, P. G. Michener, and C. F. Dillett for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from page 559 intentionally omitted]
Assistant Attorney General Thompson for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 560-562 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Green v. United States (355 U.S. 184)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
355 U.S. 184
Green v. United States (355 U.S. 184)
Argued: Oct. 16, 1957. --- Decided: Dec 16, 1957
Messrs. George Blow and George Rublee II, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Leonard B. Sand, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Opinion of the Court by Mr. Justice BLACK announced by Mr. Justice DOUGLAS.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Green v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Green v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Green v. United States (76 U.S. 655)
* Green v. United States (355 U.S. 184)
* Green v. United States (356 U.S. 165)
* Green v. United States (365 U.S. 301)
See also United States v. Green.
# Global War on Terrorism

Can be found at: GlobalSecurity.org
DATE: October 16, 2003
TO: Gen. Dick Myers; Paul Wolfowitz; Gen. Pete Pace; Doug Feith
FROM: Donald Rumsfeld
SUBJECT: Global War on Terrorism
The questions I posed to combatant commanders this week were: Are we winning or losing the Global War on Terror? Is DoD changing fast enough to deal with the new 21st century security environment? Can a big institution change fast enough? Is the USG changing fast enough?
DoD has been organized, trained and equipped to fight big armies, navies and air forces. It is not possible to change DoD fast enough to successfully fight the global war on terror; an alternative might be to try to fashion a new institution, either within DoD or elsewhere — one that seamlessly focuses the capabilities of several departments and agencies on this key problem.
With respect to global terrorism, the record since Septermber 11th seems to be:
    We are having mixed results with Al Qaida, although we have put considerable pressure on them — nonetheless, a great many remain at large.
    USG has made reasonable progress in capturing or killing the top 55 Iraqis.
    USG has made somewhat slower progress tracking down the Taliban — Omar, Hekmatyar, etc.
    With respect to the Ansar Al-Islam, we are just getting started.
Have we fashioned the right mix of rewards, amnesty, protection and confidence in the US?
Does DoD need to think through new ways to organize, train, equip and focus to deal with the global war on terror?
Are the changes we have and are making too modest and incremental? My impression is that we have not yet made truly bold moves, although we have have made many sensible, logical moves in the right direction, but are they enough?
Today, we lack metrics to know if we are winning or losing the global war on terror. Are we capturing, killing or deterring and dissuading more terrorists every day than the madrassas and the radical clerics are recruiting, training and deploying against us?
Does the US need to fashion a broad, integrated plan to stop the next generation of terrorists? The US is putting relatively little effort into a long-range plan, but we are putting a great deal of effort into trying to stop terrorists. The cost-benefit ratio is against us! Our cost is billions against the terrorists' costs of millions.
    Do we need a new organization?
    How do we stop those who are financing the radical madrassa schools?
    Is our current situation such that "the harder we work, the behinder we get"?
It is pretty clear that the coalition can win in Afghanistan and Iraq in one way or another, but it will be a long, hard slog.
Does CIA need a new finding?
Should we create a private foundation to entice radical madradssas to a more moderate course?
What else should we be considering?
Please be prepared to discuss this at our meeting on Saturday or Monday.
Thanks.
# Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act

Memorandum published at Whitehouse.gov on April 20, 2017. Scan: File:Presidential Memorandum on the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act.pdf.
Administration of Donald J. Trump , 2017
April 20, 2017
By the President of the United States of America
A Memorandum
Memorandum on the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act
The Archivist of the United States
Subject: The Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act
Memorandum for Certain Congressional Committee Chairs
Dear Mr. Chairman:
In accordance with section 1264 of the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (Subtitle F, Public Law 114-328)(the "Act") I have enclosed the initial report on its implementation. This report, compiled by the Departments of State, the Treasury, and other relevant executive departments and agencies (agencies), outlines my Administration's support for this important legislation and makes clear our commitment to its robust and thorough enforcement.
As noted in the report, my Administration is actively identifying persons and entities to whom the Act may apply and are collecting the evidence necessary to apply it. Over the coming weeks and months, agencies will undertake thorough interagency vetting to ensure we fulfill our commitment to hold perpetrators of human rights abuses and corruption accountable.
As we implement this legislation, the United States will continue its leadership role in championing fundamental human rights and sound, transparent governance.
Sincerely,
    Donald J. Trump
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Global Information Society Watch 2016 - Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Internet

GISWatch site
The 47 country reports gathered here illustrate the link between the internet and economic, social and cultural rights (ESCRs). Some of the topics will be familiar to information and communications technology for development (ICT4D) activists: the right to health, education and culture; the socioeconomic empowerment of women using the internet; the inclusion of rural and indigenous communities in the information society; and the use of ICT to combat the marginalisation of local languages. Others deal with relatively new areas of exploration, such as using 3D printing technology to preserve cultural heritage, creating participatory community networks to capture an “inventory of things” that enables socioeconomic rights, crowdfunding to realise rights, or the negative impact of algorithms on calculating social benefits. Workers' rights receive some attention, as does the use of the internet during natural disasters.
Ten thematic reports frame the country reports. These deal both with overarching concerns when it comes to ESCRs and the internet – such as institutional frameworks and policy considerations – as well as more specific issues that impact on our rights: the legal justification for online education resources, the plight of migrant domestic workers, the use of digital databases to protect traditional knowledge from biopiracy, digital archiving, and the impact of multilateral trade deals on the international human rights framework.
The reports highlight the institutional and country-level possibilities and challenges that civil society faces in using the internet to enable ESCRs. They also suggest that in a number of instances, individuals, groups and communities are using the internet to enact their socioeconomic and cultural rights in the face of disinterest, inaction or censure by the state.
# Global Businesswomen's Day

Source: 1999 Congressional Record, Vol. 145, Page E2140{{{3}}}
Global Businesswomen's Day
HON. JENNIFER DUNN
OF WASHINGTON IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Tuesday, October 19, 1999
Ms. DUNN. Mr. Speaker, since I was first elected in 1992, I have had great pleasure in witnessing the tremendous growth of women in business. Women now are starting businesses at twice the rate of men and employing more than all of the Fortune 500 companies worldwide.
In my home State of Washington, there are 188,400 women-owned businesses, including part-time firms, employing 509,800 people and generating $61.6 billion in sales.
As Co-Chair with Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez for the Congressional Circle for the Foundation for Women Legislators, I am pleased to designate Tuesday, October 19th as Global Businesswomen's Day. We are proud to make this proclamation on the historic occasion of the Business Women's Network Global Summit in Washington, DC. It is an honor to salute the 1,500 delegates who have come from 97 countries around the globe and 47 states spanning the United States. Thanks to the Business Women's Network for focusing on diversity; the theme of the summit on October 19th is One America, One World.
Recognizing the importance of businesswomen and the BWN Global Summit, we are honored to show congressional recognition of the Global Business Women's Summit. How fitting it is that it is also National Business Women's Week. This proclamation salutes these women from across the globe who are symbols of hard work, dedication, and success in the new millennium.
In partnership, the Businesswomen's Network and the National Foundation for Women Legislators have created a strategic alliance: 2000 by 2000. The goal is to connect 2,000 elected women to work in partnership with 2,000 business leaders by the year 2000. Such a partnership between women legislators and women business owners has never been established. Yet businesswomen are the engines that empower women legislators. Think of the synergy--businesswomen and women legislators working hand-in-hand toward the common goal of empowering women everywhere.
Another major thrust of the summit is using cutting-edge technology to create more business for more women across more borders. By connecting globally, women can grow their businesses in new markets regardless of the size of their company. Fostering free and fair trading practices worldwide is particularly important in my home State of Washington, where nearly one in three jobs are trade dependent.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Global Information Society Watch 2015 - Sexual Rights and the Internet

GISWatch site
This edition of GISWatch presents stories from around the world on how the politics of sex and sexual rights activism takes place online. We want to research how generally accepted sexual identities, as well as marginalised sexualities, are expressed, regulated and moralised on the internet. We also want to show how this relates to the threats of surveillance, censorship and online violence.
The eight thematic reports introduce the theme from different perspectives, including the global policy landscape for sexual rights and the internet, the privatisation of spaces for free expression and engagement, the need to create a feminist internet, how to think about children and their vulnerabilities online, and consent and pornography online.
These thematic reports frame the 57 country reports that follow. The topics of the country reports are diverse, ranging from the challenges and possibilities that the internet offers lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LBGTI communities, to the active role of religious, cultural and patriarchal establishments in suppressing sexual rights, including same-sex marriage, to the rights of sex workers, violence against women online, and sex education in schools.
Each country report includes a list of action steps for future advocacy.
The timing of this publication is critical: many across the globe are denied their sexual rights, some facing direct persecution for their sexuality (in several countries, homosexuality is a crime). While these reports seem to indicate that the internet does help in the expression and defence of sexual rights, they also show that in some contexts this potential is under threat – whether through the active use of the internet by conservative and reactionary groups, or through threats of harassment and violence. The reports suggest that a radical revisiting of policy, legislation and practice is needed in many contexts to ensure that the possibilities of the internet for guaranteeing sexual rights are realised all over the world.
# Hints towards the formation of a more comprehensive theory of life

HINTS
TOWARDS THE
FORMATION OF A MORE COMPREHENSIVE
THEORY OF LIFE.
BY
S. T. COLERIDGE.
EDITED BY
SETH B. WATSON, M.D.
OF ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE, AND FORMERLY ONE OF THE PHYSICIANS TO THE HOSPITAL AT OXFORD.
"Magna sunt opera Domini exquisita in omnes voluntates ejus."
LONDON: JOHN CHURCHILL, PRINCES STREET, SOHO,
MDCCCXLVIII.
* Advertisement
* Preface
* Physiology of Life
* The Nature of Life
** Part 1
** Part 2
** Part 3
** Part 4
** Part 5
** Part 6
* Postscript
* Catalogue
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hints towards the formation of a more comprehensive theory of life/Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT.
The Editor takes this opportunity of returning his best acknowledgments to Sir John Stoddart, LL.D., to the Rev. James Gillman, Incumbent of Trinity, Lambeth, and to Henry Lee, Esq., Assistant Surgeon to King's College Hospital, for their great kindness, in regard to this publication.
16, Norfolk Street, Park Lane.
# Hints towards the formation of a more comprehensive theory of life/Postscript

POSTSCRIPT.
The Editor deems it right to state that the contents of the foregoing pages were, amongst other Papers, placed at his disposal by an intimate friend of the late S. T. Coleridge; and from internal evidence he was induced to attribute to that gentleman the entire authorship. After, however, the present edition had passed through the press, and was on the eve of publication, circumstances arose which led to the belief that the work might with more propriety be considered as the joint production of Mr. Coleridge and the late Mr. James Gillman, of Highgate.
16, Norfolk Street, Park Lane; October 17, 1848.