OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/13th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 49

Chap. XLIX.—An Act for reducing the duties payable on prize goods captured by the private armed vessels of the United States.
Reduction of duties on prize goods.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That on all goods, wares, and merchandise captured from the enemy, and made good and lawful prize of war, by any private armed ship or vessel of the United States, having a commission for making captures upon the enemy, or letters of marque and reprisal, and brought in to the United States or their territories, there shall be allowed a deduction of thirty-three and one third per cent. on the amount of duties at present imposed by law.
Approved, August 2, 1813.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/13th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 54

Chap. LIV.—An Act making additional appropriations for the support of government during the year one thousand eight hundred and thirteen.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That in addition to the sums appropriated by the act making appropriations for the support of government for the year one thousand eight hundred and thirteen, the following sums be, and they are hereby respectively appropriated, that is to say:
Specific appropriations.For expenses of intercourse with foreign nations, in addition to the heretofore appropriated, the sum of thirty-eight thousand five hundred dollars.
For the relief and protection of American seamen, in addition to the sums heretofore appropriated, the sum of forty thousand dollars.
For fitting up four rooms in the building purchased by the United States, where the general post office is held, for the use of the superintendent general of military supplies, two thousand thirty-nine dollars and twelve and a half cents.
For books, stationery, furniture, wood, and other contingent expenses, the sum of one thousand dollars.
Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the several sums hereby appropriated shall be paid out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, August 2, 1813.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/13th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 48

Chap. XLVIII.—An Act authorizing the sale of sundry lots, the property of the United States, in the borough of Pittsburg.
The President to cause lots in the borough of Pittsburg to be sold.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be, and he is hereby authorized, to cause to be sold certain lots of ground in the borough of Pittsburg, in the State of Pennsylvania, being the property of the United States, and the same on which fort Fayette now stands, the proceeds whereof are hereby appropriated, under the direction of the President, to the erection of arsenals, armories, and laboratories.
Approved, August 2, 1813.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/13th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 41

Chap. XLI.—An Act explanatory of an act, entitled “An act to raise ten additional companies of rangers.”
Act of February 25, 1813, ch. 31,Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That each of the ten companies authorized by the act, entitled “An act to raise ten additional companies of rangers,” shall consist of one captain, one first, one second, one third lieutenant, one ensign, five sergeants, six corporals, and ninety privates.
Approved, August 2, 1813.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/13th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 50

Chap. L.—An Act supplementary to the act, entitled “An Act for the better regulation of the Ordnance.”
Act of May 14, 1812, ch. 83. Deputy commissaries of ordnance to be appointed, not exceeding five.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That in addition to the present number allowed by law, as many deputy commissaries of ordnance may be appointed, not exceeding five, as the President of the United States shall deem necessary to the public service, who shall be entitled to the same rank, pay, emoluments, rations, and forage, as are provided by the act to which this is a supplement.
Approved, August 2, 1813.
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 1567

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted unanimously by the Security Council at its 5057th meeting, on 14 October 2004
The Security Council,
Recalling its resolutions 827 (1993) of 25 May 1993, 1166 (1998) of 13 May 1998, 1329 (2000) of 30 November 2000, 1411 (2002) of 17 May 2002, 1481 (2003) of 19 May 2003, 1503 (2003) of 28 August 2003 and 1534 (2004) of 26 March 2004,
Having considered the nominations for Permanent Judges of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia received by the Secretary-General,
Forwards the following nominations to the General Assembly in accordance with Article 13 bis (1) (d) of the Statute of the International Tribunal:
    Mr. Carmel A. Agius (Malta)
    Mr. Jean-Claude Antonetti (France)
    Mr. Iain Bonomy (United Kingdom)
    Mr. Liu Daqun (China)
    Mr. Mohamed Amin El-Abbassi El Mahdi (Egypt)
    Mr. Elhagi Abdulkader Emberesh (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya)
    Mr. Rigoberto Espinal Irias (Honduras)
    Mr. O-gon Kwon (Republic of Korea)
    Mr. Theodor Meron (United States of America)
    Mr. Bakone Melema Moloto (South Africa)
    Ms. Prisca Matimba Nyambe (Zambia)
    Mr. Alphonsus Martinus Maria Orie (Netherlands)
    Mr. Kevin Horace Parker (Australia)
    Mr. Fausto Pocar (Italy)
    Mr. Yenyi Olungu (Democratic Republic of the Congo)
    Mr. Sharada Prasad Pandit (Nepal)
    Ms. Vonimbolana Rasoazanany (Madagascar)
    Mr. Patrick Lipton Robinson (Jamaica)
    Mr. Wolfgang Schomburg (Germany)
    Mr. Mohamed Shahabuddeen (Guyana)
    Ms. Christine Van den Wyngaert (Belgium)
    Mr. Volodymyr A. Vassylenko (Ukraine)
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 157

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 906th meeting, by 8 votes to 2 (Poland, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics), with 1 abstention (France), on 17 September 1960
The Security Council,
Having considered the item on its agenda as contained in document S/Agenda/906, [1]
Taking into account that the lack of unanimity of its permanent members at the 906th meeting of the Security Council has prevented it from exercising its primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security,
Decides to call an emergency special session of the General Assembly, as provided in General Assembly resolution 377 A (V) of 3 November 1950, in order to make appropriate recommendations.
[1] See Official Records of the Security Council, Fifteenth Year, 906th meeting, p.1.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 1569

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted unanimously by the Security Council at its 5063rd meeting, on 26 October 2004
The Security Council,
Acting in accordance with Article 28 (3) of the Charter of the United Nations,
1. Decides to hold meetings in Nairobi starting on 18 November 2004 and ending on 19 November 2004, and that the agenda for these meetings will be “The Reports of the Secretary-General on the Sudan”;
2. Decides also to discuss Sudan with representatives of the African Union and the Intergovernmental Authority on Development at the above-mentioned meetings, and to take the opportunity of the presence of the Security Council in Nairobi to discuss other peace efforts in the region with both the African Union and the Intergovernmental Authority on Development;
3. Decides also, with respect to the meetings referred to in paragraph 1 above to waive the requirement laid down in Rule 49 of the Council’s provisional rules of procedure that the verbatim record of each meeting of the Council shall be made available on the first working day following the meeting and decides that the verbatim record will be issued in New York subsequently.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 1570

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted unanimously by the Security Council at its 5068th meeting, on 28 October 2004
The Security Council,
Recalling all its previous resolutions on Western Sahara, including resolution 1495 (2003) of 31 July 2003 and resolution 1541 (2004) of 29 April 2004,
Reaffirming its commitment to assist the parties to achieve a just, lasting and mutually acceptable political solution, which will provide for the self-determination of the people of Western Sahara in the context of arrangements consistent with the principles and purposes of the Charter of the United Nations, and noting the role and responsibilities of the parties in this respect,
Reiterating its call upon the parties and States of the region to continue to cooperate fully with the United Nations to end the current impasse and to achieve progress towards a political solution,
Having considered the report of the Secretary-General of 20 October (S/2004/827),
1. Decides to extend the mandate of the United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO) until 30 April 2005;
2. Requests that the Secretary-General provide a report on the situation before the end of the mandate period and an interim report, within three months from adoption of the resolution, on the evolution of the situation and on the mission’s size and concept of operation, with further detail on the options discussed in the Secretary-General’s report of 20 October 2004 (S/2004/827) on the possible reduction of MINURSO staff, including civilian and administrative personnel;
3. Calls on Member States to consider voluntary contributions to fund Confidence Building Measures that allow for increased person-to-person contact, in particular the exchange of family visits;
4. Decides to remain seized of the matter.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Reports/Volume 582

* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc.
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Microsoft Corp. v. Baker
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Sessions v. Morales-Santana
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Henson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Virginia v. LeBlanc
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Packingham v. North Carolina
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Ziglar v. Abbasi
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) McWilliams v. Dunn
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Matal v. Tam
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of San Francisco County
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Jenkins v. Hutton
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Weaver v. Massachusetts
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Turner v. United States
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Maslenjak v. United States
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Jae Lee v. United States
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Murr v. Wisconsin
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Board
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. ANZ Securities, Inc.
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Davila v. Davis
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Hernandez v. Mesa
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Pavan v. Smith
* 582 U.S. ___ (2017) Trump. v. International Refugee Assistance Project
# United States Reports/Volume 583

* 583 U.S. ___ (2017) Kernan v. Cuero
* 583 U.S. ___ (2017) Dunn v. Madison
* 583 U.S. ___ (2017) Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago
* 583 U.S. ___ (2017) In re United States
* 583 U.S. ___ (2018) Tharpe v. Sellers
* 583 U.S. ___ (2018) District of Columbia v. Wesby
* 583 U.S. ___ (2018) Artis v. District of Columbia
* 583 U.S. ___ (2018) National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense
* 583 U.S. ___ (2018) CNH Industrial N.V. v. Reese
* 583 U.S. ___ (2018) Montana v. Wyoming
* 583 U.S. ___ (2018) Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers
* 583 U.S. ___ (2018) Class v. United States
* 583 U.S. ___ (2018) Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran
* 583 U.S. ___ (2018) Murphy v. Smith
* 583 U.S. ___ (2018) Patchak v Zinke
* 583 U.S. ___ (2018) Jennings v. Rodriguez
* 583 U.S. ___ (2018) Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc.
* 583 U.S. ___ (2018) U.S. Bank N.A. v. Village at Lakeridge, LLC
* 583 U.S. ___ (2018) Texas v. New Mexico
* 583 U.S. ___ (2018) Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund
# United States Reports/Volume 585

* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Animal Science Products, Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co.
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Gill v. Whitford
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Lozman v. Riviera Beach
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Chavez-Meza v. United States
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Rosales-Mireles v. United States
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Benisek v. Lamone
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Pereira v. Sessions
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Lucia v. SEC
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. United States
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Carpenter v. United States
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp.
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Ortiz v. United States
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Currier v. Virginia
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Dalmazzi v. United States
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Cox v. United States
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Ohio v. American Express Co.
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Abbott v. Perez
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Trump v. Hawaii
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Florida v. Georgia
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Janus v. State, County, and Municipal Employees
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Sause v. Bauer
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) Sexton v. Beaudreaux
* 585 U.S. ___ (2018) North Carolina v. Covington
# United States Reports/Volume 586

* 586 U. S. ___ (2018) Mount Lemmon Fire Dist. v. Guido
* 586 U. S. ___ (2018) Weyerhaeuser Co. v. United States Fish and Wildlife Serv.
* 586 U. S. ___ (2018) United States v. Stitt
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Escondido v. Emmons
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Shoop v. Hill
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Culbertson v. Berryhill
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Stokeling v. United States
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Helsinn Healthcare S. A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Moore v. Texas
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Timbs v. Indiana
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Dawson v. Steager
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Yovino v. Rizo
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Nutraceutical Corp. v. Lambert
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Jam v. International Finance Corp.
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Garza v. Idaho
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Madison v. Alabama
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Fourth Estate Pub. Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) BNSF R. Co. v. Loos
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Rimini Street, Inc. v. Oracle USA, Inc.
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Washington State Dept. of Licensing v. Cougar Den, Inc.
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Nielsen v. Preap
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP
* 586 U. S. ___ (2019) Frank v. Gaos
# United States Reports/Volume 584

* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Marinello v. United States
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Ayestas v. Davis
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Hall v. Hall
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Kisela v. Hughes
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Wilson v. Sellers
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Sessions v. Dimaya
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) United States v. Microsoft Corp.
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Jesner v. Arab Bank, PLC
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) United States v. Sanchez-Gomez
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Byrd v. United States
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) McCoy v. Louisiana
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Dahda v. United States
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Upper Skagit Tribe v. Lundgren
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Lagos v. United States
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Collins v. Virginia
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) City of Hays v. Vogt
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Hughes v. United States
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Koons v. United States
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. Appling
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Azar v. Garza
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Sveen v. Melin
* 584 U.S. ___ (2018) Washington v. United States
# United States Reports/Volume 587

* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Republic of Sudan v. Harrison
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Sturgeon v. Frost
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Lorenzo v. SEC
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Biestek v. Berryhill
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Bucklew v. Precythe
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Emulex Corp. v. Varjabedian
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Thacker v. TVA
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Cochise Consultancy, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Hunt
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Apple Inc. v. Pepper
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Albrecht
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Herrera v. Wyoming
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Nieves v. Bartlett
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Home Depot USA, Inc. v. Jackson
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Smith v. Berryhill
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc.
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Mont v. United States
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Fort Bend County v. Davis
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Taggart v. Lorenzen
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Azar v. Allina Health Services
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. Newton
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Return Mail, Inc. v. Postal Service
* 587 U.S. ___ (2019) Quarles v. United States
# United States Reports/Volume 6

2 Cranch, ( 2 L.Ed. )
* 6 U.S. 10 Faw v. Marsteller
* 6 U.S. 33 Pennington v. Coxe
* 6 U.S. 64 Alexander Murray v. Charming Betsy
* 6 U.S. 126 Capron v. Van Noorden
* 6 U.S. 127 Head Amory v. Providence Insurance Company
* 6 U.S. 170 Little v. Barreme
* 6 U.S. 180 Dunlop Co v. Ball
* 6 U.S. 185 Blakeney v. Evans
* 6 U.S. 187 Church v. Hubbart
* 6 U.S. 240 William Mason v. Blaireau
* 6 U.S. 272 Ogden Cornell v. Blackledge Salter
* 6 U.S. 280 (1778) M'Ilvaine v. Coxe's Lessee
* 6 U.S. 336 Adams v. Woods
* 6 U.S. 342 Winchester v. Hackley
* 6 U.S. 344 Reily v. Lamar Beall Smith
* 6 U.S. 358 United States v. Fisher Blight
* 6 U.S. 407 Telfair Rae Somerville v. Stead's
* 6 U.S. 419 Graves Barnewall v.
* 6 U.S. 445 Hepburn Dundas v. Ellzey
# United States Code/Title 17/Chapter 8

From the U.S. Copyright Office.
* Section 801. Copyright Royalty Judges; appointment and functions
* Section 802. Copyright Royalty Judgeships; staff
* Section 803. Proceedings of Copyright Royalty Judges
* Section 804. Institution of proceedings
* Section 805. General rule for voluntarily negotiated agreements
* Section 806. Repealed
* Section 807. Repealed
* Section 808. Repealed
* Section 809. Repealed
* Section 810. Repealed
# United States Code/Title 17/Chapter 7

From the U.S. Copyright Office.
* Section 701. The Copyright Office: General responsibilities and organization
* Section 702. Copyright Office regulations
* Section 703. Effective date of actions in Copyright Office
* Section 704. Retention and disposition of articles deposited in Copyright Office
* Section 705. Copyright Office records: Preparation, maintenance, public inspection, and searching
* Section 706. Copies of Copyright Office records
* Section 707. Copyright Office forms and publications
* Section 708. Copyright Office fees
* Section 709. Delay in delivery caused by disruption of postal or other services
* Section 710. Repealed
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/18th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 93

Chap. XCIII.—An Act to authorize the sale of unserviceable ordnance, arms, and military stores.
The President of the United States to cause to be sold any ordnance, &c., damaged to such a degree, as renders them useless to the public service.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be, and he is hereby, authorized to cause to be sold any ordnance, arms, ammunition or other military stores, or subsistence, or medical supplies, which, upon proper inspection or survey, shall appear to be damaged, or otherwise unsuitable for the public service, whenever, in his opinion, the sale of such unserviceable stores will be advantageous to the public service.
The inspection or survey to be made by an inspector general.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the inspection or survey of the unserviceable stores shall be made by an inspector general, or such other officer or officers as the Secretary of War may appoint for that purpose; and the sales shall be made under such rules and regulations as may be prescribed by the Secretary of War.
Approved, March 3, 1825.