OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# East European Quarterly/Volume 15/Number 1

* related portals: Periodicals, Czech lands.
* related authors: František Palacký.
(ISSN 0012-8449USPS 164-620)
Volume XV
Spring 1981
No. 1
František Palacký (1798–1876): Centennial AppreciationJoseph Frederick Zacek
František Palacký and the Development of Modern Czech NationalismFrantišek Kutnar
Palacký at the Slav Congress of 1848Lawrence D. Orton
Palacký and Havlíček: Their Political RelationshipThomas G. Pesek
Palacký and Czech Politics After 1876Bruce M. Garver
Palacký and Czech Culture in the First Half of the Nineteenth CenturyJosef Hanzal
The Relationship Between the German and Czech Versions of Palacký’s History of the Czech NationOlga Sveljkovská
František Palacký and the National MuseumAleš Chalupa
František Palacký and the Beginning of the Austrian Academy of Arts and SciencesAnna M. Drabek
František Palacký and His Wife TerezieJaroslava Hoffmanová
Mr. PalackýAlena Šubrtová
Reviews
BOARD OF EDITORS :
| NORTH AMERICA | Adam Bromke (McMaster University) Zbigniew K. Brzezinski (Columbia University) Dimitrije Djordjevic (University of California) John V.A. Fine, Jr. (University of Michigan) William E. Griffith (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Andrew Gyorgy (George Washington University) George W. Hoffman (University of Texas) Halil Inalcik (University of Chicago) Andrew C. Janos (University of California) Bela K. Kiraly (City University of New York) Radomir V. Luza (Tulane University) John M. Montias (Yale University) Irwin T. Sanders (Boston University) Jan R. Triska (Stanford University) |
| EUROPE | Georges Castellan (France) Manuel B. Garcia Alvarez (Spain) Herman Gross (Germany) Mirjana Gross (Yugoslavia) George Handlery (Switzerland) Louise Laourdas (Greece) Walter Leitsch (Austria) Roger Portal (France) Hugh Seton-Watson (England) Angelo Tamborra (Italy) Bela Vago (Israel) Dragan R. Zivojinovic (Yugoslavia) |
| EDITOR | Stephen Fischer-Galati (University of Colorado) |
The editors assume no responsibility for statements of fact or opinion made by contributors.
The East European Quarterly is published quarterly. Yearly subscriptions (four numbers) $12.00 for institutions; $10.00 for faculty and research scholars; $8.00 for students. Single issues, $3.00.
East European Quarterly, 1200 University Avenue, Boulder, Colorado, 80309. Published four times per year (March, June, September, January) at the University of Colorado. Second class postage paid at Boulder, Colorado.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) between 1978 and March 1, 1989 (inclusive) without a copyright notice, and without subsequent copyright registration with the U.S. Copyright Office within 5 years.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Wagner

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
249 U.S. 465
Ex parte Wagner
Argued: March 17, 1919. --- Decided: April 14, 1919
Messrs.
H. A. Toulmin and H. A. Toulmin, Jr., both of Dayton, Ohio, for petitioners.
Mr. Reeve Lewis, of Washington, D. C., for respondents.
Mr. Justice CLARKE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Wall
## Dissenting Opinion

    Field
United States Supreme Court
107 U.S. 265
J. B. Wall
Chas. W. Jones and Wilkinson Call, for petitioner.
Jas. W. Locke, U.S. Judge, for himself.
BRADLEY, J.
A petition was filed in this case by J. B. Wall for an alternate writ of mandamus to be directed to James W. LOCKE, district judge of the United States for the southern district of Florida, to show cause why a peremptory writ should not issue to compel him to vacate an order made by him as such district judge, prohibiting said Wall from practicing at the bar of said court, and to restore said Wall to the rights, privileges, and immunities of an attorney and proctor thereof. The petition set forth the proceedings complained of, and an order was made by this court requiring the judge to show cause why the prayer of the petition should not be granted. The rule to show cause has been answered, and we are now called upon to decide whether the writ ought to be granted.
The proceedings of the court below for disbarring the petitioner were substantially as follows:
On the seventh of March, 1882, during a term of the said court, held at Tampa, Hillsborough County, Florida, the same court exercising both Circuit and District Court jurisdiction, J. W. LOCKE, the judge then holding said court, issued, and caused to be served upon the petitioner, the following order:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ex parte Uppercu

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
239 U.S. 435
Ex parte Uppercu
Argued: December 6, 1915. --- Decided: December 20, 1915
Mr. Alvin Cushing Cass for petitioner.
Messrs. Frank W. Knowlton, Charles F. Choate, Jr., and James Garfield for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 436-438 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Elijah E. Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act (H.R. 3; 117th Congress)/Title V

117th congress (2021-2022)
       Subtitle A — Biomedical Innovation Expansion
       Subtitle B — Investing In Safety And Innovation
       Subtitle C — Overdose Epidemic Response
# Elijah

Elijah is an oratorio written by Felix Mendelssohn in 1846 for the Birmingham Festival. It depicts various events in the life of the Biblical prophet Elijah, taken from the books 1 Kings and 2 Kings in the Old Testament.Warning: template has been deprecated.
See also: The history of Mendelssohn's oratorio 'Elijah'.
As God the Lord of Israel liveth
Felix Mendelssohn Elijah arranged for duet 1.jpg
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Elijah's Wagon knew no thill

Elijah's Wagon knew no thill Was innocent of Wheel Elijah's horses as unique As was his vehicle —
Elijah's journey to portray Expire with him the skill Who justified Elijah In feats inscrutable —
# Elijah E. Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act (H.R. 3; 117th Congress)

117th congress (2021-2022)
117th CONGRESS 1st Session
H.R. 3
To establish a fair price negotiation program, protect the Medicare program from excessive price increases, and establish an out-of-pocket maximum for Medicare part D enrollees, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 22, 2021
Mr. Pallone (for himself, Mr. Neal, and Mr. Scott of Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Education and Labor, Oversight and Reform, and Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To establish a fair price negotiation program, protect the Medicare program from excessive price increases, and establish an out-of-pocket maximum for Medicare part D enrollees, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

### SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.—This Act may be cited as the “Elijah E. Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act”.
    (b) Table Of Contents.—The table of contents is as follows:
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
       TITLE I − LOWERING PRICES THROUGH FAIR DRUG PRICE NEGOTIATION
       TITLE II − PRESCRIPTION DRUG INFLATION REBATES
       TITLE III − PART D IMPROVEMENTS AND MAXIMUM OUT-OF-POCKET CAP FOR MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES
       TITLE IV − DRUG PRICE TRANSPARENCY
       TITLE V − NIH, FDA, AND OVERDOSE EPIDEMIC FUNDING
          Subtitle A — Biomedical Innovation Expansion
          Subtitle B — Investing In Safety And Innovation
          Subtitle C — Overdose Epidemic Response
# Elijah's example declares

ELIJAH fed by ravens(s) by John Newton
    Elijah's example declares,
    Whatever distress may betide;
    The saints may commit all their cares
    To him who will surely provide:
    When rain long withheld from the earth
    Occasioned a famine of bread;
    The prophet, secure from the dearth,
    By ravens was constantly fed.
    More likely to rob than to feed,
    Were ravens who live upon prey;
    But when the Lord's people have need,
    His goodness will find out a way:
    This instance to those may seem strange,
    Who know not how faith can prevail;
    But sooner all nature shall change,
    Than one of God's promises fail.
    Nor is it a singular case,
    The wonder is often renewed;
    And many can say, to his praise,
    He sends them by ravens their food:
    Thus worldlings, though ravens indeed,
    Though greedy and selfish their mind,
    If God has a servant to feed,
    Against their own wills can be kind.
    Thus Satan, that raven unclean,
    Who croaks in the ears of the saints;
    Compelled by a power unseen,
    Administers oft to their wants:
    God teaches them how to find food
    From all the temptations they feel;
    This raven, who thirsts for my blood,
    Has helped me to many a meal.
    How safe and how happy are they
    Who on the good Shepherd rely!
    He gives them out strength for their day,
    Their wants he will surely supply:
    He ravens and lions can tame,
    All creatures obey his command;
    Then let me rejoice in his name,
    And leave all my cares in his hand.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Edwards's Botanical Register/Appendix to the first twenty-three volumes/A sketch of the vegetation of the Swan River Colony/Epacridaceae

Epacridaceæ.
These are numerous, but of little interest. The genera are all found in other parts of the continent, with the solitary exception of Conostephium,$^{101}$ of which two species are known, both rather pretty shrubs, with one-sided spikes of flowers, whose pallid calyx strikingly contrasts with their conical corolla. The greater number of species belong to Leucopogon, but none of them deserve particular record. Of Lissanthe$^{102}$ there is a noble form, already introduced and known in the gardens by the false name of Leucopogon verticillatus; it has fascicles of small flowers, but its quasi-verticillated leaves, with long intervals between them, give it a singular and handsome aspect. There are several Andersonias, among which A. aristata,$^{103}$ with dense heads of bearded flowers surrounded by an aristate calyx, is the most deserving notice. To these have to be added a small red-flowered Stenanthera,$^{104}$ a long-flowered rather handsome Styphelia,$^{105}$ and two very beautiful Lysinemas.$^{106}$
$^{(101)}$ Conostephium pendulum, Benth. and Conostephium minus; foliis linearibus margine revolutis apice sphacelatis, calycibus leviter pubescentibus.—Flowers not more than half the size of C. pendulum.
$^{(102)}$ Lissanthe verticillata; foliis glaberrimis oblongo-lanceolatis striatis subtus pallidis verticillatim approximatis internodiis subæqualibus, spicis axillaribus quasi fasciculatis laxis foliis brevioribus.
$^{(103)}$ Andersonia aristata; foliis linearibus appressis acutis apice incurvis glabris, floribus capitatis, corollæ laciniis revolutis barbatis calyce aristato brevioribus.
$^{(104)}$ Stenanthera ciliata; foliis linearibus pungentibus ciliatis, bracteolis 4 striatis sepalisque apiculatis corolla brevioribus.
$^{(105)}$ Styphelia tenuifolia; foliis ovatis concavis aristatis serrulatis, tubo corollæ tenui longissimo intus nudo, ramulis subpubescentibus.
$^{(106)}$ Lysinema curvatum; ramulis tomentosis, foliis ovato-linearibus carinatis imbricatis leviter ciliatis apice incurvis, corollis arcuatis pentapetalis: unguibus apice cohærentibus intùs lanatis calyce longioribus, bracteis 25-30 margine lanatis.
$^{(107)}$ Lysinema spicatum; ramulis foliisque ovatis imbricatis carinatis glabris, floribus spicatis, bracteis foliaceis, corollis pentapetalis: unguibus longitudinaliter distinctis extus tomentosis.
# Edward Rutledge Timber Company v. Farrell/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
255 U.S. 268
Edward Rutledge Timber Company v. Farrell
Argued: Jan. 21, 1921. --- Decided: Feb 28, 1921
Claiming equitable title thereto under the homestead laws, appellee's predecessor. Delany, instituted this proceeding in the United States District Court for Idaho to compel the appellants to hold certain lands, patented to the railway company, as trustee for him. The insistence is that patent should not have issued to the company, notwithstanding the attempt to make selection under the Act of March 2, 1899 (chapter 377, 30 Stat. 993 [Comp. St. §§ 5223-5226]), prior to initiation of any homestead right in the land, because (1) it was then unsurveyed and not designated with reasonable certainty, and (2) it was within a district survey of which had been applied for by the state of Idaho under Act of August 18, 1894 (chapter 301, 28 Stat. 372, 394).
The District Court decided both points in favor of appellants and dismissed the bill; the Circuit Court of Appeals held against them on the first but did not consider the second point. Farrell v. Edward Rutledge Timber Co., 258 Fed. 161, 169 C. C. A. 229.
The facts pertinent to the first point are substantially the same as those presented by the record in West v. Rutledge Timber Co., 244 U.S. 90, 37 Sup. Ct. 587, 61 L. Ed. 1010, except that here the land was 7 1/2 miles from any known survey while there the distance was 3 1/2 miles. The Land Department found the description sufficient for reasonable certainty and we see no adequate ground for disregarding that conclusion.
As the district designated by Idaho for survey contained very much more land than the state was entitled to select, the Land Department refused to consider the application. No appeal was taken. Upon an analysis of pertinent statutes, opinions of the Land Department and of this court, the District Court held that the mere filing of application for survey did not so far withdraw the land from the public domain as to make the railway's selection wholly ineffective; and further, that if valid for any purpose, the application merely gave an option to select, never exercised in respect of the land now in dispute. We agree with the conclusion reached; and in view of the careful supporting opinion further discussion seems unnecessary.
The decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals must be reversed and the decree of the District Court affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Edwards' Lessee v. Darby

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
25 U.S. 206
Edwards' Lessee v. Darby
Jan. 24th.
THIS cause was argued by Mr. Talbot, for the plaintiff, and by Mr. Eaton, for the defendant. Jan. 29th.
Mr. Justice TRIMBLE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Edwards's Botanical Register/Appendix to the first twenty-three volumes

A sketch of the vegetation of the Swan River Colony A systematical index to the first twenty-three volumes of The Botanical Register An alphabetical index to the first twenty-three volumes of The Botanical Register Plates
# Edwards's Botanical Register

The Botanical Register, subsequently known as Edwards's Botanical Register, was an illustrated horticultural magazine that ran from 1815 to 1847. It was started by the botanical illustrator Sydenham Edwards. Edwards edited five volumes in five years before his death in 1819. After Edwards' death, editorial duties passed to the publisher, James Ridgeway, who issued a further nine volumes between 1820 and 1828. In 1829, John Lindley was appointed editor, and he adopted the title Edwards's Botanical Register. A further nineteen volumes were issued before the magazine was discontinued in 1847. Warning: template has been deprecated.
For Volumes 1 to 14, see The Botanical Register.
Volumes 15 to 23 are given two volume numbers: one for Edward's Botanical Register, and one for the entire Botanical Register series. For example, Volume 15 is presented as "Volume 1, or Volume 15 of the whole series". The latter number is adopted here.
* Volume 15 (1829, containing Plates 1217 to 1305) IA
* Volume 16 (1830, containing Plates 1306 to 1391) IA
* Volume 17 (1831, containing Plates 1392 to 1446) IA
* Volume 18 (1832, containing Plates 1447 to 1564) IA
* Volume 19 (1833, containing Plates 1565 to 1652) IA
* Volume 20 (1835, containing Plates 1653 to 1741) IA
* Volume 21 (1836, containing Plates 1742 to 1828) IA
* Volume 22 (1836, containing Plates 1829 to 1919) IA
* Volume 23 (1837, containing Plates 1920 to 2014) IA
* Appendix to the First Twenty-three Volumes (1839)
Volumes 24 to 33 are presented as a new series, with volume numbers starting from one. For example, Volume 24 is presented as "New Series, Volume 1". It is common practice, however, to refer to these as Volumes 24 to 33, so as to avoid confusion with previous volumes. Plate numbers begin at 1 in each volume.
* Volume 24 (1838, 68 plates) IA
* Volume 25 (1839, 69 plates) IA
* Volume 26 (1840, 71 plates) IA
* Volume 27 (1841, 70 plates) IA
* Volume 28 (1842, 69 plates) IA
* Volume 29 (1843, 66 plates) IA
* Volume 30 (1844, 67 plates) IA
* Volume 31 (1845, 69 plates) IA
* Volume 32 (1846, 69 plates) IA
* Volume 33 (1847, 70 plates) IA
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Elliot v. Lombard

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
292 U.S. 139
Elliot v. Lombard
Argued: March 6, 1934. --- Decided: April 9, 1934
Messrs. Wm. H. McClendon, Jr., and J. Zach Spearing, both of New Orleans, La., for petitioner.
Mr. P. M. Milner, of New Orleans, La., for respondent.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Elliot v. Elliot

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
ELLIOT verſus ELLIOT.
T
After report, Sergeant moved to amend the rule by the agreement filed: and leave was according given.
# Elliott

Ebenezer Elliott was to the artisans of England what Burns was to the peasantry of Scotland. His Corn-law Rhymes contributed not a little to that overwhelming tide of popular opinion and feeling which resulted in the repeal of the tax on bread. Well has the eloquent author of The Reforms and Reformers of Great Britain said of him, "Not corn-law repealers alone, but all Britons who moisten their scanty bread with the sweat of the brow, are largely indebted to his inspiring lay, for the mighty bound which the laboring mind of England has taken in our day."
Hands off! thou tithe-fat plunderer! play No trick of priestcraft here! Back, puny lordling! darest thou lay A hand on Elliott's bier? Alive, your rank and pomp, as dust, Beneath his feet he trod.
He knew the locust swarm that cursed The harvest-fields of God. On these pale lips, the smothered thought Which England's millions feel, A fierce and fearful splendor caught, As from his forge the steel. Strong-armed as Thor, a shower of fire His smitten anvil flung; God's curse, Earth's wrong, dumb Hunger's ire, He gave them all a tongue!
Then let the poor man's horny hands Bear up the mighty dead, And labor's swart and stalwart bands Behind as mourners tread. Leave cant and craft their baptized bounds, Leave rank its minster floor; Give England's green and daisied grounds The poet of the poor!
Lay down upon his Sheaf's green verge That brave old heart of oak, With fitting dirge from sounding forge, And pall of furnace smoke! Where whirls the stone its dizzy rounds, And axe and sledge are swung, And, timing to their stormy sounds, His stormy lays are sung.
There let the peasant's step be heard, The grinder chant his rhyme, Nor patron's praise nor dainty word Befits the man or time. No soft lament nor dreamer's sigh For him whose words were bread; The Runic rhyme and spell whereby The foodless poor were fed!
Pile up the tombs of rank and pride, O England, as thou wilt! With pomp to nameless worth denied, Emblazon titled guilt! No part or lot in these we claim; But, o'er the sounding wave, A common right to Elliott's name, A freehold in his grave!
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Elliott v. Chicago M St. P Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
150 U.S. 245
Elliott v. Chicago M St. P Railway Company
Statement by Mr. Justice BREWER.
This case was commenced in the district court of Clay county, Dakota territory, on August 31, 1886, by the plaintiff in error, Biddena Elliott, widow of John Elliott, deceased, against the railway company, to recover damages on account of the death of John Elliott, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant and its employes.
The defendant answered, a trial was had at the September term, 1886, and the plaintiff recovered a verdict for $7,000. Judgment having been entered thereon, the defendant appealed to the supreme court of the territory, which reversed the judgment and remanded the case for a new trial. 5 Dak. 523, 41 N. W. Rep. 758.
The case was again tried, though apparently in the district court of Minnehaha county, at the April term, 1889, upon the same evidence that was presented on the first trial. A verdict was directed in favor of the defendant, and judgment entered thereon. Plaintiff appealed to the supreme court, which, on May 31, 1889, affirmed the judgment. Thereupon a writ of error was sued out from this court.
Melvin Grigsby, for plaintiff in error.
H. H. Field and John W. Cary, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice BREWER, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ellicott v. Pearl

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
35 U.S. 412
Ellicott v. Pearl

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse