OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Rules of Sheffield United Mechanics (1865)

Laws of Sheffield United Mechanics Cricket and Athletic Club for the 1865-6 season, as reproduced in the Nottingham Evening Post, 22 February 1935.

## Rules (selected)

* Kick-off from middle must be a place kick.
* Kick out must not be more than ten yards out of goal.
* Fair catch is a catch from any player, provided the ball has not touched the ground or been thrown direct from touch and entitles to a free-kick.
* Charging is fair in case of a place kick (with the exception of a kick-off) as soon as the player offers to kick; but he may always draw back, unless he has actually touched the ball with his foot.
* Pushing with the hands is allowed, but no hacking or tripping up is fair under any circumstances whatsoever.
* No player may be held or pulled over.
* It is not lawful to take the ball off the ground (except in touch) for any purpose.
* Holding the ball (except in the case of a free kick) or knocking, or pushing it on with the hand or arm is altogether disallowed. The side breaking this rule forfeits a free kick to the opposing side.
* A goal cannot be obtained by free kick from a catch.
* When the ball is in touch, the side that first touches it must bring it to the edge of the touch at the place where it went in, and throw it straight out at least six yards, and it must touch the ground before coming in contact with any player, except it be kicked out at the goal-sides, then it must be taken to the corner-flag and thrown in.

## Paraphrase of other rules

* A goal outweighted any number of rouges, but in the event of no goals being scored, matches were decided by rouges.
* A rouge was obtained by the player who first touched the ball after it had been kicked between the rouge flags, and when a rouge had been obtained, one of the defending side had to "stand two yards in front of the centre of the goal sticks."
* A curious rule was that if no goals were scored in the first half of a match the sides should change goals, but there was no mention of what should be done if a goal was scored.
* A footnote stated that the above laws were not intended to define all the Rules of the Game, but only such as were peculiar to the club. It concluded: "There are certain fundamental rules which are observed in all Football Games."

## Notes

* ↑ Compare with Sheffield Rules (1862)
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1924, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 99 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rules of The Foot-Ball Club (1833)

Rules of the Foot-Ball Club of Edinburgh dating from 1833, found in handwritten notes by the club's founder John Hope. Compare Rules of the Public Playground at Stockbridge (1854).
1. Single-soled shoes, no iron
2. No tripping
3. Ball to pass imaginary line
4. A free kick if ball out of bounds
5. Pushing is allowed. Holding not illegal
6. Allow the ball to be lifted between fields
Aff[irmative] Fun, air, exercise
Neg[ative] — No tripping —

## Notes

* ↑ Compare Rules of the Public Playground at Stockbridge (1854). According to one source, this rule "appears to mean that the only time the ball could be lifted, i.e. picked up or handled, was when it was out of play 'between fields'": see "Playing the game in 1833 - the world's earliest known rules of football". Scottish Sport History. 2018-05-05. Retrieved 2019-07-07. (Wikisource contributor note)
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1924, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 99 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rules of football, Trinity College, Hartford (1858)

Published rules for a "game of foot-ball, between twenty students at Trinity and twenty 'town boys'", played November 6th, 1858.
1st. Each side shall choose two umpires, whose decision, under the following rules shall be final.
2d. A line shall be drawn at 50 feet from either bound, over which lines the sides shall not pass before the ball has been canted.
3d There shall be no carrying of the ball.
4th. A clear space of at least ten feet shall be given in front of the ball after it has been caught.
5th. Fifteen minutes shall be allowed between each game
6th. Players shall, under no circumstances, be allowed to hold on to one of the opposite party.
7th. Each side must keep on their own side of the ball.
8th If the ball goes over the side bounds, it shall be kicked through the middle by the player who gets it.

## Notes

* ↑ James A. H. Murray (ed.) (1893). A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles ii. Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. 78. [Entry "cant" (v.2) 2.b.]: To turn over completely, turn upside down (Wikisource contributor note)
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1924, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 99 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rules of football for the Eton-Harrow Match (1862)

Rules drawn up for an Eton-Harrow match played at Cambridge in November 1862
Rules drawn up for a Match at Football, to be played between Etonian and Harrovian Resident Members of the University.
(i) That there be eleven a-side; also that a Captain and Umpire be chosen on each side; the Captain to manage his side, and all appeals to the Umpire to be made through the Captain only. The Captains and Umpires shall appoint a neutral person as referee, whose decision upon appeal from the Umpires in every case shall be final.
(ii) The choice of Bases or Goals, and kick off shall be determined by tossing; the Captains shall also toss for choice of ball; provided that if two matches are played, the side losing the toss in the first match, shall play with their own ball in the second match.
(iii) The Bases shall be twelve feet between the poles, the poles themselves not exceeding Twenty feet in height and being joined at the top by a string.
The length of the ground shall be one hundred and fifty yards and the breadth one hundred yards.
(iv) The Game shall last for an hour and a quarter; at the expiration of half the time the Umpires shall call "change", and the sides shall change their Bases.
(v) The Ball shall be kicked off from the middle of the ground, half-way between the two Bases, at the beginning and change of the Game, and after a Base obtained by either side; the "kick-off" being always in the same direction.
(vi) All charging is fair; but holding, pushing with the hands, tripping up, shinning and back-shinning are forbidden. No nails are allowed in boots unless even with the sole.
(vii) If the ball shall go beyond the prescribed limits of the Game, whether behind the line of bases, or at the side, it shall be out of play, and must be kicked straight in again to the Game. No player shall intentionally kick the ball behind the line of his own base.
(viii) The Ball when in play may be stopped by any part of the body, but may not be held or hit by the hands, arms, or shoulders.
(ix) A base is obtained when the Ball being in play shall pass between the base-poles.
(x) When there are three or less than three of the opposite side between any player and his opponents' base, and the Ball is kicked to him from the direction of his own base, he shall be considered sneaking or behind, and is out of play, until another has touched the ball.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1924, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 99 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Santobello v. New York
## Concurring Opinion

    Douglas

## Dissenting Opinion

    Marshall
United States Supreme Court
404 U.S. 257
Santobello v. New York
Certiorari to Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department
No. 70-98 Argued: November 15, 1971 --- Decided: December 20, 1971
After negotiations with the prosecutor, petitioner withdrew his previous not-guilty plea to two felony counts and pleaded guilty to a lesser-included offense, the prosecutor having agreed to make no recommendation as to sentence. At petitioner's appearance for sentencing many months later a new prosecutor recommended the maximum sentence, which the judge (who stated that he was uninfluenced by that recommendation) imposed. Petitioner attempted unsuccessfully to withdraw his guilty plea, and his conviction was affirmed on appeal.
Held: The interests of justice and proper recognition of the prosecution's duties in relation to promises made in connection with "plea bargaining" require that the judgment be vacated and that the case be remanded to the state courts for further consideration as to whether the circumstances require only that there be specific performance of the agreement on the plea (in which case petitioner should be re-sentenced by a different judge), or petitioner should be afforded the relief he seeks of withdrawing his guilty plea. Pp. 260-263.
35 App. Div. 2d 1084, 316 N.Y.S. 2d 194, vacated and remanded.
BURGER, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which DOUGLAS, WHITE, and BLACKMUN, JJ., joined. DOUGLAS, J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 263. MARSHALL, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which BRENNAN and STEWART, JJ., joined, post, p. 267.
Irving Anolik argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Daniel J. Sullivan argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Burton B. Roberts.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Santos-Zacaria v. Garland/Opinion of Justice Alito

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 21–1436
LEON SANTOS-ZACARIA AKA LEON SANTOS-SACARIAS, PETITIONER v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT [May 11, 2023]
Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins, concurring in judgment.
I agree with the Court that 8 U. S. C. §1252(d)(1) does not require the filing of a motion for reconsideration under the circumstances presented here. That provision requires the exhaustion of those administrative remedies that are “available to [an] alien as of right,” but the decision to grant reconsideration is discretionary. 8 CFR §1003.2(a) (2022). Because that determination disposes of this case, I would not decide whether §1252(d)(1) is jurisdictional with respect to the administrative remedies to which it does apply.
# Santos v. Holy Roman Catholic and Apostolic Church

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
212 U.S. 463
Santos v. Holy Roman Catholic and Apostolic Church
Argued: January 9, 1909. --- Decided: February 23, 1909
Messrs. Charles F. Consaul, George F. Pollock, and Frank B. Ingersoll for plaintiffs in error.
No appearance for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Scarface

* related portals: American literature.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
SCARFACE
SCARFACE
BY ARMITAGE TRAIL
EDWARD J. CLODE, Inc. NEW YORK
COPYRIGHT, 1930, BY EDWARD J. CLODE, INC.
All rights reserved
Printed in the United States of America
To
LEO MARGULIES
SCARFACE
All the characters in this story are imaginary
* Chapter 1
* Chapter 2
* Chapter 3
* Chapter 4
* Chapter 5
* Chapter 6
* Chapter 7
* Chapter 8
* Chapter 9
* Chapter 10
* Chapter 11
* Chapter 12
* Chapter 13
* Chapter 14
* Chapter 15
* Chapter 16
* Chapter 17
* Chapter 18
* Chapter 19
* Chapter 20
* Chapter 21
* Chapter 22
* Chapter 23
* Chapter 24
* Chapter 25
* Chapter 26
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works published in 1930 could have had their copyright renewed in 1957 or 1958, i.e. between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st, 1959.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1930, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 93 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Scarborough v. Pargoud/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
108 U.S. 567
Scarborough v. Pargoud
The final decree in this case was rendered on the thirteenth of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the chief justice of the supreme court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the fifth of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the fourteenth, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the sixteenth, of that month. No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev. St. § 1008; Cummings v. Jones, 104 U.S. 419. In Brooks v. Norris, 11 How. 207, it was decided (Chief Justice TANEY, speaking for the court) that 'the writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly.' This case is cited with approval in Mussina v. Cavazos, 6 Wall. 360.
It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason the writ is dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Scarborough v. Pargoud

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
108 U.S. 567
Scarborough v. Pargoud
John W. Scarborough, for himself.
No counsel for defendant in error.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Scher v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
305 U.S. 251
Scher v. United States
Argued: Nov. 9, 1938. --- Decided: Dec 5, 1938
Messrs. Gerald A. Doyle and A. L. Greenspun, both of Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner.
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Alexander Holtzoff, of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Schenebeck v. McCrary/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
298 U.S. 36
Schenebeck v. McCrary
Prior to its insolvency, the Lonoke County Bank was he duly designated depository for the public funds of Lonoke County, Ark. In November, 1934, the county court entered an order compromising the liability of the sureties on the depository bond. In December, 1934, appellant, a taxpayer of the county, brought this action, in the first count, against the county treasurer and her bondsmen, and in the second count, against the bondsmen for the depository, seeking to recover the amount of public funds on deposit in the bank when it closed.
The defense relied upon Acts No. 16, page 37, and No. 325, page 949, of the Acts of Arkansas of 1935. Act No. 16 released county treasurers and their bondsmen from liability where deposited funds had been lost by reason of the insolvency of the bank and not through defalcation of the county treasurer. By Act No. 325, similar relief was given to the bondsmen for a county depository. Appellant contended that the legislation impaired the obligation of contracts in violation of article 1, section 10, of the Constitution of the United States.
The trial court sustained the plea of the county treasurer and her bondsmen, under Act No. 16, and overruled the plea of the bondsmen for the depository, and rendered judgment accordingly. On appeal and cross-appeal, the Supreme Court of the State affirmed the judgment with respect to the county treasurer and her bondsmen, and reversed the judgment and dismissed the cause with respect to the bondsmen for the depository, construing and sustaining the legislation invoked. The Supreme Court of the State decided that the individual taxpayers had no vested interest in the public funds in question and hence that there was no impairment of the obligation of contracts. The state court drew a distinction between the case of such taxpayers in relation to general public funds, and those who have a vested interest in the funds of an improvement district, citing Bauer v. North Arkansas Highway Improvement District No. 1, 168 Ark. 220, 224, 270 S.W. 533, 38 A.L.R. 1507.
While this Court, when a question under the contract clause is raised, may examine the alleged contract in order to determine the obligations which inhere in it, we find no ground for disturbing the ruling of the state court as to petitioner's lack of a vested interest in the funds deposited. Compare Violet Trapping Company, Inc. v. Grace, 297 U.S. 119, 56 S.Ct. 386, 80 L.Ed. 518, decided February 3, 1936; Ingraham v. Hanson, 297 U.S. 378, 56 S.Ct. 511, 80 L.Ed. 728, decided March 2, 1936.
The judgment is affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Schenley Distillers Corporation v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
326 U.S. 432
Schenley Distillers Corporation v. United States
On Jurisdictional Statement Distributed
Nov. 17, 1945.
Decided Jan. 2, 1946.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Delaware.
Mr. Charles Edmond Cotterill, of New York City, for appellants.
Messrs. Sol. Gen., Hugh J. McGrath, and J. Stanley Payne, both of Washington, D.C., for appellees.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Schenebeck v. McCrary

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
298 U.S. 36
Schenebeck v. McCrary
mS.CT673m-
Mr. John R. Thompson, of Little Rock, Ark., for appellant.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Schiavo ex rel. Schindler v. Schiavo

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Schiavo ex rel. Schindler v. Schiavo."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Schiavo ex rel. Schindler v. Schiavo (357 F. Supp. 2d 1378)
* Schiavo ex rel. Schindler v. Schiavo (403 F.3d 1223)