OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 1402

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 4503rd meeting, by a vote of 14 to 0, on 29 March 2002 [1]
The Security Council,
Reaffirming its resolutions 242 (1967) of 22 November 1967, 338 (1973) of 22 October 1973, 1397 (2002) of 12 March 2002, and the Madrid principles,
Expressing its grave concern at the further deterioration of the situation, including the recent suicide bombings in Israel and the military attack against the headquarters of the President of the Palestinian Authority,
1. Calls upon both parties to move immediately to a meaningful ceasefire; calls for the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Palestinian cities, including Ramallah; and calls upon the parties to cooperate fully with Special Envoy Zinni, and others, to implement the Tenet security work plan as a first step towards implementation of the Mitchell Committee recommendations, with the aim of resuming negotiations on a political settlement;
2. Reiterates its demand in resolution 1397 (2002) of 12 March 2002 for an immediate cessation of all acts of violence, including all acts of terror, provocation, incitement and destruction;
3. Expresses support for the efforts of the Secretary-General and the special envoys to the Middle East to assist the parties to halt the violence and to resume the peace process;
4. Decides to remain seized of the matter.
[1] Syria did not participate in the voting.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 140

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted unanimously by the Security Council at its 870th meeting, on 29 June 1960
The Security Council,
Having examined the application of the Malagasy Republic [1],
Recommends to the General Assembly that the Malagasy Republic be admitted to membership in the United Nations.
[1] Official Records of the Security Council, Fifteenth Year, Supplement for April, May, and June 1960, document S/4352/Rev.1.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 1403

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted unanimously by the Security Council at its 4506th meeting, on 4 April 2002
The Security Council,
Reaffirming its resolutions 1397 (2002) of 12 March 2002 and 1402 (2002) of 30 March 2002,
Gravely concerned at the further deterioration of the situation on the ground and noting that resolution 1402 (2002) has not yet been implemented,
1. Demands the implementation of its resolution 1402 (2002) without delay;
2. Welcomes the mission of the U.S. Secretary of State to the region, as well as efforts by others, in particular the special envoys from the United States, the Russian Federation, the European Union and the United Nations Special Coordinator, to bring about a comprehensive, just and lasting peace to the Middle East;
3. Requests the Secretary-General to follow the situation and keep the Council informed;
4. Decides to remain seized of the matter.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 1406

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted unanimously by the Security Council at its 4523rd meeting, on 30 April 2002
The Security Council,
Recalling all its previous resolutions on Western Sahara, in particular resolution 1394 (2002) of 27 February 2002,
1. Decides to extend the mandate of United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO) until 31 July 2002 in order to consider further the report of the Secretary-General of 19 February 2002 (S/2002/178);
2. Decides to remain seized of the matter.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 1405

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted unanimously by the Security Council at its 4516th meeting, on 19 April 2002
The Security Council,
Reaffirming its resolutions 242 (1967) of 22 November 1967, 338 (1973) of 22 October 1973, 1397 (2002) of 12 March 2002, 1402 (2002) of 30 March 2002, 1403 (2002) of 4 April 2002, and the Statement of its President of 10 April 2002 (S/PRST/2002/9),
Concerned by the dire humanitarian situation of the Palestinian civilian population, in particular reports from the Jenin refugee camp of an unknown number of deaths and destruction,
Calling for the lifting of restrictions imposed, in particular in Jenin, on the operations of humanitarian organizations, including the International Committee of the Red Cross and United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East,
Stressing the need for all concerned to ensure the safety of civilians, and to respect the universally accepted norms of international humanitarian law,
1. Emphasizes the urgency of access of medical and humanitarian organizations to the Palestinian civilian population;
2. Welcomes the initiative of the Secretary-General to develop accurate information regarding recent events in the Jenin refugee camp through a fact-finding team and requests him to keep the Security Council informed;
3. Decides to remain seized of the matter.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Esnault-Pelterie

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Esnault-Pelterie."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Esnault-Pelterie (299 U.S. 201)
* United States v. Esnault-Pelterie (303 U.S. 26)
# United States v. Erwin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
147 U.S. 685
United States v. Erwin
Sol. Gen. Aldrich and Felix Brannigan, for the United States.
William W. Dudley, L. T. Michener, and R. R. McMahon, for appellee.
Mr. Justice BROWN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Esnault-Pelterie (299 U.S. 201)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
299 U.S. 201
United States v. Esnault-Pelterie
Argued: Oct. 22, 1936. --- Decided: Dec 7, 1936
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Drury W. Cooper, of New York City, for the Unied States.
Mr. Eugene V. Myers, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Esnault-Pelterie (303 U.S. 26)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
303 U.S. 26
United States v. Esnault-Pelterie (303 U.S. 26)
Argued: Jan. 7, 1938. --- Decided: Jan 31, 1938
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Drury W. Cooper, of New York City, for the United States.
Messrs. George T. Bean and Eugene V. Myers, both of New York City, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Estate of Donnelly

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Harlan

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
397 U.S. 286
United States v. Estate of Donnelly
Argued: Jan. 12, 1970. --- Decided: March 23, 1970
Matthew J. Zinn, Asst. to the Solicitor Gen., for petitioner.
Daniel N. Pevos. Southfield, Mich., for respondents.
Mr. Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Erie Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
107 U.S. 1
United States v. Erie Railway Company
Sol. Gen. Phillips, for the United States, by whom petition was submitted.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Code/Title 5/Part II

From the Cornell Law School U.S. Code Collection
Title 5—Government Organization and Employees Part II—Civil Service Functions and Responsibilities
* Chapter 11—Office of Personnel Management
* Chapter 12—Merit Systems Protection Board, Office of Special Counsel, and Employee Right of Action
* Chapter 13—Special Authority
* Chapter 14—Agency Chief Human Capital Officers
* Chapter 15—Political Activity of Certain State and Local Employees
# United States Code/Title 5/Part III

From the U.S. House of Representatives
Title 5—Government Organization and Employees Part III—Employees
* Subpart A—General Provisions
** Chapter 21—Definitions
** Chapter 23—Merit System Principles
** Chapter 29—Commissions, Oaths, Records, and Reports
* Subpart B—Employment and Retention
** Chapter 31—Authority for Employment
** Chapter 33—Examination, Selection, and Placement
** Chapter 34—Part-Time Career Employment Opportunities
** Chapter 35—Retention Preference, Voluntary Separation Incentive Payments, Restoration, and Reemployment
** Chapter 37—Information Technology Exchange Program
* Subpart C—Employee Performance
** Chapter 41—Training
** Chapter 43—Performance Appraisal
** Chapter 45—Incentive Awards
** Chapter 47—Personnel Research Programs and Demonstration Projects
** Chapter 48—Agency Personnel Demonstration Project
* Subpart D—Pay and Allowances
** Chapter 51—Classification
** Chapter 53—Pay Rates and Systems
** Chapter 54—Human Capital Performance Fund
** Chapter 55—Pay Administration
** Chapter 57—Travel, Transportation, and Subsistence
** Chapter 59—Allowances
* Subpart E—Attendance and Leave
** Chapter 61—Hours of Work
** Chapter 63—Leave
* Subpart F—Labor-Management and Employee Relations
** Chapter 71—Labor-Management Relations
** Chapter 72—Antidiscrimination; Right to Petition Congress
** Chapter 73—Suitability, Security, and Conduct
** Chapter 75—Adverse Actions
** Chapter 77—Appeals
** Chapter 79—Services to Employees
* Subpart G—Insurance and Annuities
** Chapter 81—Compensation for Work Injuries
** Chapter 83—Retirement
** Chapter 84—Federal Employees' Retirement System
** Chapter 85—Unemployment Compensation
** Chapter 87—Life Insurance
** Chapter 89—Health Insurance
** Chapter 89A—Enhanced Dental Benefits
** Chapter 89B—Enhanced Vision Benefits
** Chapter 90—Long-Term Care Insurance
* Subpart H—Access to Criminal History Record Information
** Chapter 91—Access to Criminal History Records for National Security and Other Purposes
* Subpart I—Miscellaneous
** Chapter 95—Personnel flexibilities relating to the Internal Revenue Service
** Chapter 97—Department of Homeland Security
** Chapter 98—National Aeronautics and Space Administration
** Chapter 99—Department of Defense National Security Personnel System
# United States Code/Title 5/Part I/Chapter 5/Subchapter II

From the Cornell Law School U.S. Code Collection
Part I — The Agencies Generally Chapter 5 — Administrative Procedure
# War and Peace (Tolstoy)/Book 5

* Chapter 1
* Chapter 2
* Chapter 3
* Chapter 4
* Chapter 5
* Chapter 6
* Chapter 7
* Chapter 8
* Chapter 9
* Chapter 10
* Chapter 11
* Chapter 12
* Chapter 13
* Chapter 14
* Chapter 15
* Chapter 16
* Chapter 17
* Chapter 18
* Chapter 19
* Chapter 20
* Chapter 21
* Chapter 22
# United States v. Woodson/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
371 U.S. 12
United States v. Woodson
The judgment is reversed. United States v. Wise, 370 U.S. 405, 82 S.Ct. 1354, 8 L.Ed.2d 590.
Mr. Justice GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Woodson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
371 U.S. 12
United States v. Woodson
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger and Lionel Kestenbaum, for the United States.
John J. Carmody, John J. Wilson, Charles J. Steele, Francis Kelly, Lawrence J. Latto, Francis M. Shea, Richard T. Conway, Ellsworth T. Simpson, William F. Kelly, Richard H. Nicolaides and W. V. T. Justis, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Woo Jan

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
245 U.S. 552
United States v. Woo Jan
Argued: and Submitted Jan. 17, 1918. --- Decided: Jan 28, 1918
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Fitts, for the United States.
Mr. Francis R. Marvin, of Cleveland, Ohio, for Woo Jan.
Mr. Justice McKENNA delivered the opinion o the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Wood

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Wood."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Wood (39 U.S. 430)
* United States v. Wood (299 U.S. 123)
See also Wood v. United States.
# United States v. Wood (299 U.S. 123)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
299 U.S. 123
United States v. Wood
Argued: Oct. 20, 1936. --- Decided: Dec 7, 1936
[Syllabus from pages 123-125 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Paul S. McMahon, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Messrs. Wm. E. Leahy and Robert I. Miller, both of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 125-130 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Reports/Volume 186

* 186 U.S. 1 (1902) The Steamship Styria
* 186 U.S. 24 (1902) Montana Mining Company v. St. Louis Mining & Milling Company of Montana
* 186 U.S. 33 (1902) Emsheimer v. City of New Orleans
* 186 U.S. 70 (1902) Bement & Sons v. National Harrow Company
* 186 U.S. 95 (1902) Nathan Murphy v. James Utter
* 186 U.S. 114 (1902) Louis Beyer v. Caroline Le Fevre
* 186 U.S. 126 (1902) Emanuel Felsenheld 288 v. United States
* 186 U.S. 135 (1902) Bowker v. United States
* 186 U.S. 142 (1902) Henry Ward v. Edward Joslin
* 186 U.S. 153 (1902) Joseph Nesbitt v. United States
* 186 U.S. 157 (1902) Frederick Williams v. George Gaylord
* 186 U.S. 168 (1902) Lee Lung v. Patterson
* 186 U.S. 177 (1902) Gallaway v. State National Bank Of Fort Worth Texas
* 186 U.S. 178 (1902) Hatfield v. King
* 186 U.S. 181 (1902) Hanover National Bank Of The City Of New York v. Max Moyses
* 186 U.S. 193 (1902) Chin Bak Kan v. United States
* 186 U.S. 202 (1902) First National Bank Of Denver Colorado & v. John Klug
* 186 U.S. 206 (1902) Lee Clark v. Monroe Herington
* 186 U.S. 212 (1902) Bienville Water Supply Company v. City of Mobile
* 186 U.S. 224 (1902) Hardy v. United States
* 186 U.S. 230 (1902) Jenkins v. Neff
* 186 U.S. 238 (1902) Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Company v. Forrest Manning &
* 186 U.S. 257 (1902) Minneapolis & Slouis Railroad Company v. State Of Minnesota Railroad & Warehouse Commission
* 186 U.S. 269 (1902) New York Central & Hudson River Raidroad Company '' '' v. City Of New York
* 186 U.S. 273 (1902) Henrietta Hoffeld v. United States
* 186 U.S. 279 (1902) Pine River Logging & Improvement Company '' '' v. United States
* 186 U.S. 298 (1902) United States v. Austin Nicholls & Company
* 186 U.S. 304 (1902) Thomas Kennard v. State Of Nebraska
* 186 U.S. 309 (1902) United States v. Edward Freel
* 186 U.S. 320 (1902) Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company
* 186 U.S. 342 (1902) Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland v. Courtney
* 186 U.S. 365 (1902) Brainard Warner v. Lily Alys Godfrey
* 186 U.S. 380 (1902) Compagnie Francaise De Navigation A Vapeur v. State Board Of Health Louisiana
* 186 U.S. 401 (1902) Capital City Light & Fuel Company v. City Of Tallahassee
* 186 U.S. 413 (1902) Solomon Hotema v. United States
* 186 U.S. 423 (1902) Peter Hagan v. Scottish Union & National Insurance Company
* 186 U.S. 434 (1902) Farmers' Loan & Trust Company v. Penn Plate Glass Company
* 186 U.S. 458 (1902) Marcellus Lander v. Mercantile National Bank Of Cleveland Ohio
# United States Reports/Volume 19

6 Wheaton., ( 5 L.Ed. )
* 19 U.S. 1 (1821) In Re the Amiable Isabella
* 19 U.S. 102 (1821) Bussard v. Levering
* 19 U.S. 104 (1821) Lindenberger v. Beall
* 19 U.S. 106 (1821) The Mechanics' Bank of Alexandria v. Withers
* 19 U.S. 109 (1821) Hopkins v. Lee
* 19 U.S. 119 (1821) Thatcher v. Powell
* 19 U.S. 128 (1821) Randolph v. Barbour
* 19 U.S. 129 (1821) Mayhew v. Thatcher
* 19 U.S. 131 (1821) Farmers and Mechanics' Bank of Pennsylvania v. Smith
* 19 U.S. 135 (1821) United States v. Wilkins
* 19 U.S. 146 (1821) Young v. Bryan
* 19 U.S. 152 (1821) The Bello Corrunes
* 19 U.S. 176 (1821) Smith v. Universal Insurance Company
* 19 U.S. 187 (1821) The Robert Edwards
* 19 U.S. 193 (1821) In Re the Nueva Anna and Liebre
* 19 U.S. 194 (1821) The Collector
* 19 U.S. 204 (1821) Anderson v. Dunn
* 19 U.S. 235 (1821) La Conception
* 19 U.S. 240 (1821) Willinks v. Hollingsworth
* 19 U.S. 260 (1821) Green v. Watkins
* 19 U.S. 264 (1821) Cohens v. Virginia
* 19 U.S. 448 (1821) Gibbons v. Ogden
* 19 U.S. 450 (1821) Sullivan v. The Fulton Steam Boat Company
* 19 U.S. 452 (1821) The Jonquille
* 19 U.S. 453 (1821) Hughes v. Blake
* 19 U.S. 475 (1821) Bartle v. Coleman
* 19 U.S. 481 (1821) Prevost v. Gratz Gratz
* 19 U.S. 514 (1821) Bowie v. Henderson
* 19 U.S. 519 (1821) Spring v. The South Carolina Insurance Company
* 19 U.S. 520 (1821) The United States v. Six Packages of Goods
* 19 U.S. 528 (1821) Brashier v. Gratz
* 19 U.S. 542 (1821) United States v. Daniel
* 19 U.S. 550 (1821) Kerr v. Watts
* 19 U.S. 565 (1821) Leeds v. The Marine Insurance Company
* 19 U.S. 572 (1821) The Union Bank v. Hyde
* 19 U.S. 577 (1821) Clark v. Graham
* 19 U.S. 580 (1821) Preston's Heirs v. Bowmar
* 19 U.S. 583 (1821) Otis v. Walter
* 19 U.S. 593 (1821) Goszler v. The Corporation of Georgetown
* 19 U.S. 598 (1821) M'Clung v. Silliman
* 19 U.S. 606 (1821) The Mutual Assurance Society v. Faxon