OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# A Neglected Type of Relativity

* related portals: Relativity.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Physical Review, February 1910, 30 (2): 267, Online
Abstract of a paper presented at the Princeton meeting of the Physical Society, October 23, 1909.
A NEGLECTED TYPE OF RELATIVITY.
THE negative result of all experiments to detect the earth's motion through space by its effect on terrestrial phenomena positively requires explanation, and the modern principle of relativity is generally conceded to be the most successful attempt to explain so far made. The principle has, however, led to great complexity in detail and its implications have not yet been completely worked out.
It does not seem to have been generally noticed in this connection that if the velocity of light is assumed to depend on the velocity of the source, in the same way in which the velocity of a bullet depends upon the velocity of the gun, then we have a simple type of relativity which in many ways presents a striking contrast to the principle now in vogue.
Such a light-velocity is not obviously consistent with the conception of light as a wave motion in a semi-material medium, but if there is anything that modern discoveries in fundamental physics have shown, it is that we must not reason too much from analogy or expect to find the most fundamental of all transformations of energy to resemble those transformations which we are familiar with in complex material systems.
The assumption that the velocity of light depends on that of the source has, so far as the author is aware, never been properly examined. This is strange, but is probably explainable as a natural result of the complete trust which has been put for years in the conception of an ether.
In the paper of which this is an abstract, the astronomical consequences of the assumption that the velocity of light depends on the source-velocity, in the same way that the velocity of a bullet depends on that of the gun, has been partially developed. It is found that a change in the line-of-sight-component of a star's velocity causes the time interval between any two events which happen on the star to be different from the apparent time interval between the same events as observed from the earth. If the star is very distant and changes its velocity as in the case of a binary star, it is even possible that two events may appear to happen in their reverse order.
In the case of spectroscopic binaries certain characteristic peculiarities should appear in the spectrum, peculiarities which apparently do not exist. The investigation is only just begun but so far the indications are rather against the existence of the effect.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1970, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 53 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# A Naval Biographical Dictionary/Yule, Charles Bampfield

Layout 4
​YULE. (Lieutenant, 1842.)
Charles Bampfield Yule entered the Navy 11 May, 1830; passed his examination 6 Sept. 1837; and since 2 April, 1842, the date of his promotion to the rank of Lieutenant, has been employed in command of the Bramble schooner of 10 guns, tender to the Fly and Rattlesnake, on the East India station.
# Akron, Canton, & Youngstown Railway Company v. Hagenbuch/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
318 U.S. 794
Akron, Canton, & Youngstown Railway Company v. Hagenbuch
Denied.
Mr. Justice RUTLEDGE took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Akins v. Texas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
325 U.S. 398
Akins v. Texas
Argued: April 30, May 1, 1945. --- Decided: June 4, 1945
See 66 S.Ct. 86.
Messrs. A. S. Baskett and W. J. Durham, both of Dallas, Tex., for petitioner.
Mr. Benjamin T. Woodall, of Austin, Tex., for respondent.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Akron, Canton, & Youngstown Railway Company v. Hagenbuch

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
318 U.S. 794
Akron, Canton, & Youngstown Railway Company v. Hagenbuch
Wm. H. CHAMBERLAIN, holder of record of all the common
stock of the Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railway Company, etc., et al., petitioners,
v.
George E. HAGENBUCH and H. B. Stewart, Jr.,
Trustees, etc., et al.
No. 355. Supreme Court of the United States
April 19, 1943
Rehearing Denied May 24, 1943.
See 319 U.S. 782, 63 S.Ct. 1169, 87 L.Ed. --.
Messrs. Paul D. Miller and John Wallis, for petitioner.
Messrs. Andrew P. Martin and H. L. Chapman, for trustees of Akron, C. & Y. Ry Co. and another.
Mr. Shelton Pitney, for Bondholders' Protective Committee for Northern Ohio Ry. Co. First Mortgage Bonds.
Mr. George C. Sharp, for Bondholders' Committee for Akron, C. & Y. Ry. Co. General & Refunding Mortgage Gold Bonds.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Akron Railway Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
261 U.S. 184
Akron Railway Company v. United States
Argued: Jan. 9, 10, 1923. --- Decided: Feb 19, 1923
[Syllabus on pages 184-185 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Walter C. Noyes and H. T. Newcomb, both of New York City, for appellants.
Mr. H. A. Taylor, of New York City, for Erie R. Co. and others.
Mr. Alexander H. Elder, of New York City, for Central R. Co. of New Jersey.
Mr. Charles F. Choate, Jr., of Boston, Mass., for Boston & M. R. R.
Mr. Blackburn Esterline, of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
Mr. Walker D. Hines, of New York City, for Interstate Commerce Commission.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Aktieselskabet Cuzco v. The Sucarseco

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
294 U.S. 394
Aktieselskabet Cuzco v. The Sucarseco
Argued: Feb. 14, 1935. --- Decided: March 4, 1935
Mr. Wm. H. McGrann, of New York City, for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 395-397 intentionally omitted]
Mr. D. Roger Englar, of New York City, for respondents.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Roswell, John (2)

From volume 3 of the work.
​Ros(e)well, John, of Somerset, pleb. Magdalen Hall, matric. 26 Oct., 1599, aged 19; B.A. 16 May, 1607, M.A. 22 June, 1610, vicar of Doulting, Somerset, 1610. See Foster's Index Eccl.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Ryan, Donald

From volume 3 of the work.
​Ryan, Donald (Rian), B.Can.L. 12 Aug., 1556, as Daniel. See Fasti, i. 95, 150.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Rycks, John

From volume 3 of the work.
​Rycks, John, Minorite; died 1536. See Ath. i. 101. ]
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Rosse, Thomas (1)

From volume 3 of the work.
​Rosse, Thomas, s. G. (? "Gul."), of London, gent. Christ Church, matric. 3 Dec. 1669, aged 16.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Roswell, Walter

From volume 3 of the work.
​Ros(e)well, Walter, B.A. from Queen's Coll. 20 Nov., 1629, M.A. 26 June, 1632; incorporated at Cambridge 1633, vicar of Doulting, Somerset, 1639. See Foster's Index Eccl. & Add. MS. 15,671, p. 87.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Rycrofte, Thomas

From volume 3 of the work.
​Rycrofte, Thomas, of Cheshire, pleb. Brasenose Coll., matric. 20 Jan., 1597-8, aged 16; subscribes Roycrofte.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Rycrofte, John

From volume 3 of the work.
​Rycrofte, John, of co. Lancaster, pleb. All Souls Coll., matric. — Feb., 1596-7 aged 15.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Roswell, John (1)

From volume 3 of the work.
​Ros(e)well, John, B.A. 31 March, 1522; perhaps vicar of Marston Magna 1519, rector of Sparkford 1522, died rector of Thorne Falcon, Somerset, about 1569. See Foster's Index Eccl.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Ryan, Donatus

From volume 3 of the work.
​Ryan, Donatus (Ream, Ryam), public reader in canon law in New Inn Hall, regular canon, B.Can.L. supd. Feb., 1532-3.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Ryan, John

From volume 3 of the work.
​Ryan, John, B.A. supl. 10 April, 1548, as Reanus.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Morgan, John (12)

From volume 3 of the work.
​Morgan, John, s. J., of Worcester (city), pleb. Magdalen Hall 16 Feb., 1713-14, aged 17; B.A. 1717, M.A. 1727.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Meyricke, Morgan

From volume 3 of the work.
​Meyricke, Morgan (Mirryke), of co. Monmouth, pleb. St. Mary Hall, matric. 14 Oct., 1596, aged 19.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Morgan, (Sir) John

From volume 3 of the work.
​Morgan, (Sir) John, 1s. Thomas, of Chenstone, co. Hereford, bart. Lincoln Coll., matric. 21 June, 1667; 2nd bart., of Kinnersley Castle, co. Hereford, governor of Chester, M.P. New Radnor 1681, co. Hereford, 1685-7, and 1689, until his death in 1692; brother of Cholmondeley. See Foster's Parliamentary Dictionary.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Meyricke, Maurice

From volume 3 of the work.
​Meyricke, Maurice (Mericke), of co. Anglesey, pleb. New Coll., matric. 11 May, 1582, aged 19; scholar 1582, B.A. 27 Oct., 1585, fellow, M.A. 2 June, 1589, registrar of the university 1600-8; died 1640. See Gutch, i. 217.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Morgan, John (11)

From volume 3 of the work.
​Morgan, John, s. Ed., of Llangelynin, co. Merioneth, cler. Jesus Coll., matric. 16 March, 1704-5, aged 16, B.A. 1708; M.A. from Catherine Hall, Cambridge, 1713.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Morgan, John (5)

From volume 3 of the work.
​Morgan, John, B.A. from St. Mary Hall 19 Oct., 1614, M.A. 1617 and in orders; one of these names vicar of Nannerch 1617, and of Tremeirchion, Flints, 1629. See Foster's Index Eccl.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Morgan, John (6)

From volume 3 of the work.
​Morgan, John, gent. Magdalen Coll., matric. 1 April, 1656.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Meyricke, Richard (1)

From volume 3 of the work.
​Meyricke, Richard (Mericke) of Oxon, gent. Trinity Coll., matric. 11 Dec., 1584, aged 20; student of Middle Temple 1587, as son and heir of Rowland, of Banbury, Oxon, gent. See Foster's Inns of Court Reg.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Meyricke, Richard (2)

From volume 3 of the work.
​Meyricke, Richard s. William, of Bodorgan, co. Anglesea, arm. Jesus Coll., matric. 27 Feb., 1693-4, aged 17; student of Gray's Inn 1694. See Foster's Gray's Inn Reg.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Morgan, John (10)

From volume 3 of the work.
​Morgan, John, s. Tho., of Wrexham, co. Denbigh, p.p. St. Alban Hall, matric. 1 April, 1699, aged 20.
# Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
315 U.S. 740
Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board
Argued: March 2, 1942. --- Decided: March 30, 1942
Messrs. Max E. Geline, of Milwaukee, Wis., Eugene Cotton, of New York City, and Lee Pressman, of Washington, D.C., for appellants.
Messrs. N. S. Boardman, of Madison, Wis., and Leo Mann, of Milwaukee, Wis., for appellees.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Allen Calculators v. National Cash Register Company

United States Supreme Court
322 U.S. 137
Allen Calculators v. National Cash Register Company
Argued: and Submitted March 28, 1944. --- Decided: May 1, 1944
See 322 U.S. 771, 64 S.Ct. 1257.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio.
Mr. Murray Seasongood, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.
Mr. Hugh McD. Ritchey, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellee National Cash Register Co.
Messrs. Chas. Fahy, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., Wendell Berge, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Charles H. Weston, Elliott H. Moyer, and Robert L. Stern, all of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Alleluia! Sing to Jesus!

Written in 1869
    Alleluia! sing to Jesus! His the scepter, His the throne.
    Alleluia! His the triumph, His the victory alone.
    Hark! the songs of peaceful Zion thunder like a mighty flood.
    Jesus out of every nation has redeemed us by His blood.
    Alleluia! not as orphans are we left in sorrow now;
    Alleluia! He is near us, faith believes, nor questions how;
    Though the cloud from sight received Him when the forty days were o’er
    Shall our hearts forget His promise, “I am with you evermore”?
    Alleluia! bread of angels, Thou on earth our food, our stay;
    Alleluia! here the sinful flee to Thee from day to day:
    Intercessor, Friend of sinners, Earth’s Redeemer, plead for me,
    Where the songs of all the sinless sweep across the crystal sea.
    Alleluia! King eternal, Thee the Lord of lords we own;
    Alleluia! born of Mary, Earth Thy footstool, heav’n Thy throne:
    Thou within the veil hast entered, robed in flesh our great High Priest;
    Thou on earth both priest and victim in the Eucharistic feast.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Allen Bradley Company v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
325 U.S. 797
ALLEN BRADLEY CO. et al. v. LOCAL UNION NO. 3, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS et al.
Argued: March 8, 9, 1945. --- Decided: June 18, 1945
See 66 S.Ct. 11.
Mr. Walter Gordon Merritt, of New York City, for petitioners.
Mr. Harold Stern, of New York City, for respondents.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Aldrich v. Aldrich

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Aldrich v. Aldrich."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Aldrich v. Aldrich (375 U.S. 75)
* Aldrich v. Aldrich (375 U.S. 249)
* Aldrich v. Aldrich (378 U.S. 540)
# Alderman v. United States (562 U.S. —)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
(slip opinion - see disclaimer)

## Dissenting Opinion

    Thomas
Cite as: 562 U. S. ____ (2011)
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
CEDRICK B. ALDERMAN v. UNITED STATES
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 09–1555. Decided January 10, 2011
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
| | The current edition of this document derives from the electronic version of the "slip opinion" posted online by the Supreme Court of the United States the day the decision was handed down. It is not the final or most authoritative version. It is subject to further revision by the Court and should be replaced with the final edition when it is published in a print volume of the United States Reports. The Court's full disclaimer regarding slip opinions follows: |
| The "slip" opinion is the second version of an opinion. It is sent to the printer later in the day on which the "bench" opinion is released by the Court. Each slip opinion has the same elements as the bench opinion—majority or plurality opinion, concurrences or dissents, and a prefatory syllabus—but may contain corrections not appearing in the bench opinion. Caution: These electronic opinions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official printed slip opinion pamphlets. Moreover, a slip opinion is replaced within a few months by a paginated version of the case in the preliminary print, and—one year after the issuance of that print—by the final version of the case in a U. S. Reports bound volume. In case of discrepancies between the print and electronic versions of a slip opinion, the print version controls. In case of discrepancies between the slip opinion and any later official version of the opinion, the later version controls. (source: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinions.aspx) ||
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Aldrich v. Aldrich (375 U.S. 75)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
375 U.S. 75
Marguerite Loretta ALDRICH, Petitioner, v. William T. ALDRICH et al.
certiorari to the supreme court of appeals of west virginia
No. 55. Argued: October 24, 1963. --- Decided: November 12, 1963.
Herman D. Rollins, Charleston, W. Va., for petitioner.
Charles M. Love, Charleston, W. Va., for respondents.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

* For subsequent certification of such questions, see post, p. 249.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Aldrich v. Aldrich (375 U.S. 249)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
375 U.S. 249
Marguerite Loretta ALDRICH, Petitioner, v. William T. ALDRICH et al.
certiorari to the supreme court of appeals of west virginia
No. 55. Argued: October 24, 1963. --- Decided: November 12, 1963. --- Certified: December 16, 1963.
Herman D. Rollins, Charleston, W. Va., for petitioner.
Charles M. Love, Charleston, W. Va., for respondents.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Aldrich v. Aldrich (375 U.S. 75)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
375 U.S. 75
Marguerite Loretta ALDRICH, Petitioner, v. William T. ALDRICH et al.
certiorari to the supreme court of appeals of west virginia
No. 55. Argued: October 24, 1963. --- Decided: November 12, 1963.
It appearing that there are questions of Florida law that are determinative of this cause, with respect to which questions there seem to be no clear controlling precedents in the decisions of the Supreme Court of Florida, this Court desires to certify to the Supreme Court of Florida, pursuant to Rule 4.61 of the Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A., the following questions:
1. Is a decree of alimony that purports to bind the estate of a deceased husband permissible, in the absence of an express prior agreement between the two spouses authorizing or contemplating such a decree?
2. If such a decree is not permissible, does the error of the court entering it render that court without subject matter jurisdiction with regard to that aspect of the cause?
3. If subject matter jurisdiction is thus lacking, may that defect be challenged in Florida, after the time for appellate review has expired, (i) by the representatives of the estate of the deceased husband or (ii) by persons to whom the deceased husband has allegedly transferred part of his property without consideration?
4. If the decree is impermissible but not subject to such attack in Florida for lack of subject matter jurisdiction by those mentioned in subparagraph 3, may an attack be successfully based o this error of law in the rendition of the decree?
The petitioner, within 20 days of the date of this opinion, is directed to file with the Clerk of this Court a proposed certificate consistent with this opinion and conforming to the requirements of Rule 4.61, supra, with proof of service of a copy thereof on counsel for the respondents. Within 10 days thereafter the respondents may file with the Clerk of this Court proposed amendments. When the certificate has been settled it will be transmitted by the Clerk of this Court to the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Florida for appropriate action.
It is so ordered.

## Notes

* For subsequent certification of such questions, see post, p. 249.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Hodges, John (12)

From volume 2 of the work.
​Hodges, John, s. Moses, of Sulgrave, Northants, cler. St. John's Coll., matric. 8 July, 1678, aged 16; student of Gray's Inn 1677; died 8 Feb., 1723-4; brother of Moses 1679. See Foster's Gray's Inn Register.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Hodges, James

From volume 2 of the work.
​Hodges, James, B.A. from Trinity Coll., Cambridge, 1649, incorporated as M.A. 12 July, 1653.*
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Hodges, John (1)

From volume 2 of the work.
​Hodges, John, fellow of All Souls' Coll. 1542, B.A. 16 Dec., 1542.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Hodges, John (11)

From volume 2 of the work.
​Hodges, John, "ser." Wadham Coll., matric. 2 July, 1658; B.A. from Magdalen Hall 7 Feb., 1661-2.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Hodges, John (2)

From volume 2 of the work.
​Hodges, John (Hodgis or Hoggis), at Corpus Christi Coll. 1549-50, from Gloucester, B.C.L. 29 June, 1557.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Hodges, Hugh (1)

From volume 2 of the work.
​Hodges, Hugh, gent. Queen's Coll., matric. 2 July, 1658; bar.-at-law, of Lincoln's Inn, 1666, bencher 1685 (as 2nd son of Hugh, of Sherborne, Dorset, gent.), serjeant-at-law 1686, recorder and M.P. Bridport 1685-7; father of the next-named. See Foster's Judges and Barristers.