OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Reports/Volume 507

* 507 U.S. 1 (1993) United States v. Nachtigal
* 507 U.S. 7 (1993) United States v. Louisiana (507 U.S. 7)
* 507 U.S. 25 (1993) Growe v. Emison
* 507 U.S. 43 (1993) Fex v. Michigan
* 507 U.S. 60 (1993) Itel Containers International Corporation v. Huddleston
* 507 U.S. 87 (1993) United States v. Dunnigan
* 507 U.S. 99 (1993) Negonsott v. Samuels
* 507 U.S. 111 (1993) United States v. A Parcel of Land, Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements Known As 92 Buena Vista Avenue, Rumson, New Jersey
* 507 U.S. 146 (1993) Voinovich v. Quilter
* 507 U.S. 163 (1993) Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit
* 507 U.S. 170 (1993) Reves v. Ernst & Young (507 U.S. 170)
* 507 U.S. 197 (1993) Smith v. United States (507 U.S. 197)
* 507 U.S. 218 (1993) Building & Construction Trades Council v. Associated Builders & Contractors of Massachusetts/Rhode Island, Inc.
* 507 U.S. 234 (1993) Ortega-Rodriguez v. United States
* 507 U.S. 258 (1993) Reiter v. Cooper
* 507 U.S. 272 (1993) Delo v. Lashley
* 507 U.S. 290 (1993) Demos v. Storrie
* 507 U.S. 292 (1993) Reno v. Flores
* 507 U.S. 349 (1993) Saudi Arabia v. Nelson
* 507 U.S. 380 (1993) Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership
* 507 U.S. 410 (1993) City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc.
* 507 U.S. 448 (1993) United States Internal Revenue Service v. McDermott
* 507 U.S. 463 (1993) Arave v. Creech
* 507 U.S. 490 (1993) Delaware v. New York
* 507 U.S. 511 (1993) Conroy v. Aniskoff
* 507 U.S. 529 (1993) United States v. Texas (507 U.S. 529)
* 507 U.S. 546 (1993) Newark Morning Ledger Company v. United States
* 507 U.S. 584 (1993) Nebraska v. Wyoming (507 U.S. 584)
* 507 U.S. 604 (1993) Hazen Paper Company v. Biggins
* 507 U.S. 619 (1993) Brecht v. Abrahamson
* 507 U.S. 658 (1993) Csx Transportation, Inc. v. Easterwood Easterwood
* 507 U.S. 680 (1993) Withrow v. Williams
* 507 U.S. 725 (1993) United States v. Olano
* 507 U.S. 746 (1993) United States v. California (507 U.S. 746)
* 507 U.S. 761 (1993) Edenfield v. Fane
# United States Reports/Volume 509

* 509 U.S. 1 (1993) Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District
* 509 U.S. 25 (1993) Helling v. McKinney
* 509 U.S. 43 (1993) Reno v. Catholic Social Services, Inc.
* 509 U.S. 86 (1993) Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation
* 509 U.S. 137 (1993) Darby v. Cisneros
* 509 U.S. 155 (1993) Sale v. Haitian Centers Council, Inc.
* 509 U.S. 209 (1993) Brooke Group, Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation
* 509 U.S. 259 (1993) Buckley v. Fitzsimmons
* 509 U.S. 292 (1993) Shalala v. Schaefer
* 509 U.S. 312 (1993) Heller v. Doe
* 509 U.S. 350 (1993) Johnson v. Texas
* 509 U.S. 389 (1993) Godinez v. Moran
* 509 U.S. 418 (1993) United States v. Edge Broadcasting Company, t/a Power 94
* 509 U.S. 443 (1993) TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.
* 509 U.S. 502 (1993) St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks
* 509 U.S. 544 (1993) Alexander v. United States (509 U.S. 544)
* 509 U.S. 579 (1993) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
* 509 U.S. 602 (1993) Austin v. United States (509 U.S. 602)
* 509 U.S. 630 (1993) Shaw v. Reno
* 509 U.S. 688 (1993) United States v. Dixon (509 U.S. 688)
* 509 U.S. 764 (1993) Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. California
# United States Reports/Volume 503

* 503 U.S. 1 (1992) Hudson v. McMillian
* 503 U.S. 30 (1992) United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.
* 503 U.S. 47 (1992) Holywell Corporation v. Smith
* 503 U.S. 60 (1992) Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools
* 503 U.S. 79 (1992) INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
* 503 U.S. 91 (1992) Arkansas v. Oklahoma
* 503 U.S. 115 (1992) Collins v. City of Harker Heights
* 503 U.S. 131 (1992) Willy v. Coastal Corporation
* 503 U.S. 140 (1992) McCarthy v. Madigan
* 503 U.S. 159 (1992) Dawson v. Delaware
* 503 U.S. 181 (1992) General Motors Corporation v. Romein
* 503 U.S. 193 (1992) Williams v. United States (503 U.S. 193)
* 503 U.S. 222 (1992) Stringer v. Black
* 503 U.S. 249 (1992) Connecticut National Bank v. Germain
* 503 U.S. 257 (1992) Pfz Properties, Inc. v. Rodriguez
* 503 U.S. 258 (1992) Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation
* 503 U.S. 291 (1992) United States v. R. L. C.
* 503 U.S. 318 (1992) Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Darden
* 503 U.S. 329 (1992) United States v. Wilson (503 U.S. 329)
* 503 U.S. 347 (1992) Suter v. Artist M.
* 503 U.S. 378 (1992) United States v. Felix
* 503 U.S. 393 (1992) Barnhill v. Johnson
* 503 U.S. 407 (1992) National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Boston & Maine Corporation
* 503 U.S. 429 (1992) Robertson v. Seattle Audubon Society
* 503 U.S. 442 (1992) United States Department of Commerce v. Montana
* 503 U.S. 467 (1992) Freeman v. Pitts
* 503 U.S. 519 (1992) Yee v. City of Escondido
* 503 U.S. 540 (1992) Jacobson v. United States
* 503 U.S. 562 (1992) Trevino v. Texas
* 503 U.S. 569 (1992) United States v. Alaska (503 U.S. 569)
* 503 U.S. 594 (1992) Barker v. Kansas
* 503 U.S. 607 (1992) United States Department of Energy v. Ohio
* 503 U.S. 638 (1992) Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz
* 503 U.S. 653 (1992) Gomez v. United States District Court for Northern District of California
* 503 U.S. 923 (1992) Hiersche v. United States
# United States Reports/Volume 504

* 504 U.S. 1 (1992) Keeney v. Tamayo-Reyes
* 504 U.S. 25 (1992) Denton v. Hernandez
* 504 U.S. 36 (1992) United States v. Williams (504 U.S. 36)
* 504 U.S. 71 (1992) Foucha v. Louisiana
* 504 U.S. 127 (1992) Riggins v. Nevada
* 504 U.S. 158 (1992) Wyatt v. Cole
* 504 U.S. 181 (1992) Wade v. United States
* 504 U.S. 188 (1992) Coleman v. Thompson (504 U.S. 188)
* 504 U.S. 191 (1992) Burson v. Freeman
* 504 U.S. 229 (1992) United States v. Burke
* 504 U.S. 255 (1992) Evans v. United States (504 U.S. 255)
* 504 U.S. 298 (1992) Quill Corporation v. North Dakota
* 504 U.S. 334 (1992) Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt
* 504 U.S. 353 (1992) Fort Gratiot Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Michigan Department of Natural Resources
* 504 U.S. 374 (1992) Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
* 504 U.S. 428 (1992) Burdick v. Takushi
* 504 U.S. 451 (1992) Eastman Kodak Company v. Image Technical Services, Inc.
* 504 U.S. 505 (1992) United States v. Thompson-Center Arms Company
* 504 U.S. 527 (1992) Sochor v. Florida
* 504 U.S. 555 (1992) Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife
* 504 U.S. 607 (1992) Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc.
* 504 U.S. 621 (1992) Federal Trade Commission v. Ticor Title Insurance Company
* 504 U.S. 648 (1992) Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Ford
* 504 U.S. 655 (1992) United States v. Alvarez-Machain
* 504 U.S. 689 (1992) Ankenbrandt v. Richards
* 504 U.S. 719 (1992) Morgan v. Illinois
* 504 U.S. 753 (1992) Patterson v. Shumate
* 504 U.S. 768 (1992) Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation
* 504 U.S. 905 (1992) Nebraska v. Wyoming (504 U.S. 905)
* 504 U.S. 932 (1992) Tomala v. United States
* 504 U.S. 933 (1992) Fowner v. United States
* 504 U.S. 946 (1992) Kinder v. United States
* 504 U.S. 962 (1992) Waller v. United States
* 504 U.S. 965 (1992) Campbell v. Brummett
* 504 U.S. 966 (1992) McCleary v. Navarro
# United States Reports/Volume 505

* 505 U.S. 1 (1992) Nordlinger v. Hahn
* 505 U.S. 42 (1992) Georgia v. McCollum
* 505 U.S. 71 (1992) Kraft General Foods, Inc. v. Iowa Department of Revenue and Finance
* 505 U.S. 88 (1992) Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Association
* 505 U.S. 123 (1992) Forsyth County, Georgia v. Nationalist Movement
* 505 U.S. 144 (1992) New York v. United States (505 U.S. 144)
* 505 U.S. 214 (1992) Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. William Wrigley, Jr. Company
* 505 U.S. 247 (1992) American National Red Cross v. S. G.
* 505 U.S. 277 (1992) Wright v. West
* 505 U.S. 317 (1992) United States v. Salerno
* 505 U.S. 333 (1992) Sawyer v. Whitley
* 505 U.S. 377 (1992) R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul
* 505 U.S. 437 (1992) Medina v. California
* 505 U.S. 469 (1992) Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Company
* 505 U.S. 504 (1992) Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
* 505 U.S. 557 (1992) City of Burlington v. Dague
* 505 U.S. 577 (1992) Lee v. Weisman
* 505 U.S. 647 (1992) Doggett v. United States
* 505 U.S. 672 (1992) International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee
* 505 U.S. 717 (1992) United States v. Fordice
* 505 U.S. 763 (1992) Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.
* 505 U.S. 788 (1992) Franklin v. Massachusetts
* 505 U.S. 830 (1992) Lee v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.
* 505 U.S. 833 (1992) Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
* 505 U.S. 1003 (1992) Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council
* 505 U.S. 1079 (1992) Espinosa v. Florida
* 505 U.S. 1301 (1992) Reynolds v. International Amateur Athletic Federation
# United States Reports/Volume 508

* 508 U.S. 1 (1993) United States v. Idaho ex rel Director, Idaho Department of Water Resources
* 508 U.S. 10 (1993) Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group
* 508 U.S. 22 (1993) Moreau v. Klevenhagen
* 508 U.S. 36 (1993) Stinson v. United States
* 508 U.S. 49 (1993) Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.
* 508 U.S. 77 (1993) United States v. Padilla
* 508 U.S. 83 (1993) Cardinal Chemical Company v. Morton International, Inc.
* 508 U.S. 106 (1993) McNeil v. United States (508 U.S. 106)
* 508 U.S. 114 (1993) Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Sac and Fox Nation
* 508 U.S. 129 (1993) Deal v. United States (508 U.S. 129)
* 508 U.S. 147 (1993) El Vocero de Puerto Rico v. Puerto Rico
* 508 U.S. 152 (1993) Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc.
* 508 U.S. 165 (1993) United States Department of Justice v. Landano
* 508 U.S. 182 (1993) Lincoln v. Vigil
* 508 U.S. 200 (1993) Keene Corporation v. United States
* 508 U.S. 223 (1993) Smith v. United States (508 U.S. 223)
* 508 U.S. 248 (1993) Mertens v. Hewitt Associates
* 508 U.S. 275 (1993) Sullivan v. Louisiana
* 508 U.S. 286 (1993) Musick, Peeler & Garrett v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
* 508 U.S. 307 (1993) Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.
* 508 U.S. 324 (1993) Nobelman v. American Savings Bank
* 508 U.S. 333 (1993) Gilmore v. Taylor
* 508 U.S. 366 (1993) Minnesota v. Dickerson
* 508 U.S. 385 (1993) Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District
* 508 U.S. 402 (1993) Good Samaritan Hospital v. Shalala
* 508 U.S. 429 (1993) Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, Inc.
* 508 U.S. 439 (1993) United States National Bank of Oregon v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.
* 508 U.S. 464 (1993) Rake v. Wade
* 508 U.S. 476 (1993) Wisconsin v. Mitchell
* 508 U.S. 491 (1993) United States Department of Treasury v. Fabe
* 508 U.S. 520 (1993) Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah
* 508 U.S. 581 (1993) Local 144 Nursing Home Pension Fund v. Demisay
* 508 U.S. 602 (1993) Concrete Pipe and Products of California, Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California
* 508 U.S. 656 (1993) Northeastern Florida Chapter of Associated General Contractors of America v. City of Jacksonville
* 508 U.S. 679 (1993) South Dakota v. Bourland
* 508 U.S. 949 (1993) In re Atlantic Richfield Company
# United States Reports/Volume 601/Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer

CASES ADJUDGED
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
AT
OCTOBER TERM, 2023
ACHESON HOTELS, LLC v. LAUFER
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 22–429. Argued October 4, 2023—Decided December 5, 2023
The Court granted review in this case to consider whether Deborah Laufer has Article III standing to sue hotels whose websites failed to state whether they have accessible rooms for the disabled as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, even if Laufer had no thought of staying at the hotels, much less booking a room. After a lower court sanctioned her lawyer, Laufer voluntarily dismissed her pending suits, including her case against Acheson Hotels, LLC, and fled a suggestion of mootness in this Court. Though Laufer’s case is moot, the circuit split on the issue briefed and argued in this Court is very much alive.
Held: This case is vacated as moot. The Court has the authority to address jurisdictional issues of mootness and standing in any order it chooses. See Sinochem Int’l Co. v. Malaysia Int’l Shipping Corp., 549 U. S. 422, 431. And while the Court is sensitive to Acheson’s concern about litigants manipulating this Court’s jurisdiction, the Court is not convinced that Laufer abandoned her case in an effort to evade the Court’s review. Pp. 4–6.
50 F. 4th 259, vacated and remanded.
Adam G. Unikowsky argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Lindsay C. Harrison, Sally A. Morris, and Andrianna D. Kastanek.
Erica L. Ross argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Prelogar, Assistant Attorney General Clarke, Deputy Solicitor General Fletcher, Bonnie I. Robin-Vergeer, and Yael Bortnick.
Kelsi Brown Corkran argued the cause for respondent. With her on the briefs were Rupa Bhattacharyya, Amy L. Marshak, and Joseph W. Mead. ​
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 131

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 842nd meeting, on 9 December 1958
The Security Council,
Having examined the application of the Republic of Guinea for membership in the United Nations, [1]
Recommends to the General Assembly that the Republic of Guinea be admitted to membership in the United Nations.
[1] Document S/4122.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 1317

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 4193rd meeting, on 5 September 2000
The Security Council,
Recalling its resolutions 1270 (1999) of 22 October 1999, 1289 (2000) of 7 February 2000 and 1313 (2000) of 4 August 2000 and all other relevant resolutions and the statements of its President concerning the situation in Sierra Leone,
1. Decides to extend the present mandate of the United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone until 20 September 2000;
2. Decides to remain actively seized of the matter.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 1318

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 4194th meeting, on 7 September 2000
The Security Council,
Decides to adopt the attached declaration on ensuring an effective role for the Security Council in the maintenance of international peace and security, particularly in Africa.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/2nd Congress/1st Session/Chapter 23

Chap. XXIII.—An Act for apportioning Representatives among the several States, according to the first enumeration.
Apportionment of representatives to Congress according to first enumeration. 1791, ch. 9. 1802, ch. 1. 1811, ch. 9. 1820, ch. 37. 1832, ch. 91. 1842, ch. 25.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the third day of March one thousand seven hundred and ninety-three, the House of Representatives shall be composed of members elected agreeably to a ratio of one member for every thirty-three thousand persons in each state, computed according to the rule prescribed by the constitution; that is to say: Within the state of New Hampshire, four; within the state of Massachussetts, fourteen; within the state of Vermont, two; within the state of Rhode Island, two; within the state of Connecticut, seven; within the state of New York, ten; within the state of New Jersey, five; within the state of Pennsylvania, thirteen; within the state of Delaware, one; within the state of Maryland, eight; within the state of Virginia, nineteen; within the state of Kentucky, two; within the state of North Carolina, ten; within the state of South Carolina, six; and within the state of Georgia, two members.
Approved, April 14, 1792.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/2nd Congress/1st Session/Chapter 18

Chap. XVIII.—An Act to erect a Lighthouse on Montok Point in the state of New York.
Lighthouse on certain conditions to be built on Montok Point in State of N. Y.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That as soon as the jurisdiction of such land on Montok Point in the state of New York as the President of the United States shall deem sufficient and most proper for the convenience and accommodation of a lighthouse shall have been ceded to the United States it shall be the duty of the secretary of the treasury, to provide by contract which shall be approved by the President of the United States, for building a lighthouse thereon, and for furnishing the same with all necessary supplies, and also to agree for the salaries or wages of the person or persons who may be appointed by the President for the superintendence and care of the same; and the President is hereby authorized to make the said appointments. That the number and disposition of the lights in the said lighthouse shall be such as may tend to distinguish it from others, and as far as is practicable, prevent mistakes.
Approved, April 12, 1792.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/2nd Congress/1st Session/Chapter 20

Chap. XX.—An Act for fixing the compensations of the Doorkeepers of the Senate and House of Representatives in Congress.
Salary of doorkeepers of Congress after present session.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the termination of the present session of Congress, the doorkeepers of the Senate and House of Representatives, shall each be allowed a salary of five hundred dollars per annum, in full compensation for their services in the said offices; and that the assistant doorkeeper to each house shall be allowed in full compensation for all his services, the sum of four hundred and fifty dollars per annum.1802, ch. 35. And it shall be the duty of the said doorkeepers to do the usual services pertaining to their respective offices during the session of Congress, and in the recess, under the direction of the secretary of the Senate and clerk of the House of Representatives, to take care of the apartments occupied by the respective houses,1789, ch. 17, sec. 5, 6. and provide fuel and other accommodations for their subsequent session. And the said compensations shall be certified and paid in like manner as is provided by law, for the other officers of the Senate and House of Representatives.
Approved, April 12, 1792.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/2nd Congress/1st Session/Chapter 26

This act was printed twice in the Statutes at Large. The duplicate is at United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/2nd Congress/1st Session/Chapter 26.
Chap. XXVI.—An Act to indemnify the Estate of the late Major General Nathaniel Green, for a certain bond entered into by him during the late war.
Estate of the late General Green indemnified for amount of a certain bond,Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the United States shall and will indemnify the estate of the late General Green, for the sum of eight thousand six hundred and eighty-eight pounds six shillings sterling money, being the amount due on the first day of May, one thousand seven hundred and eighty-six, on a certain bond executed to Messieurs Newcomen and Collet, by the said General Green, as surety for John Banks and Company, and the interest thereon; excepting therefrom a certain conditional bond given in June one thousand seven hundred and eighty-six, for about one thousand six hundred pounds sterling, (be the same more or less) being part of the aforesaid sum of eight thousand six hundred and eighty-eight pounds six shillings, which was to be paid, on certain conditions,only in case the said General Green should recover from the said Banks, or Banks and Company, a sum sufficient for his indemnity; Provided it shall appear upon due investigation, by the officers of the treasury, that the said General Green, in his lifetime, or his executors, since his decease, have not been already indemnified, or compensated for the said sum of eight thousand six hundred and eighty-eight pounds six shillings, except as aforesaid: And also provided, That the said executors shall account for a sum being about two thousand pounds sterling, (be the same more or less) recovered of John Ferrie, one of the partners of the said Banks and Company, by the said executors, to be in part of the indemnification aforesaid; and also shall make over to the Comptroller of the Treasury and his successors, for the United States, all mortgages, bonds, covenants, or other counter securities whatsoever, now due, which were obtained by the said General Green, in his lifetime, from the said Banks and Company, on account of his being surety for them as aforesaid, to be sued for in the name of the said executors for the use of the United States. duty of the officers of the Treasury herein.And the officers of the treasury are hereby authorized to liquidate and settle the sum due to the estate of the said General Green, to indemnify the same, as aforesaid, according to the true intent and meaning of this act, and to pay the same, out of the treasury of the United States, to the said executors, to be accounted for by them, as part of the said estate.
Approved, April 27, 1792.