OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Men of the Time, eleventh edition/Blades, William

Layout 2
​BLADES, William, born at Clapham, Surrey, in 1824, was educated at Clapham Grammar School, under the Rev. C. Pritchard, F.R.S., Savilian Professor at Oxford, and succeeded his father as a printer in London. He has edited "The Gouvernayle of Helthe," and other early-printed books; has contributed numerous articles to the current literature of the day upon the History of Printing and Palæotypography; but is best known by his works "The Life of William Caxton," 2 vols., 1863, and "The Enemies of Books," 1881; the former of which for the first time placed the study of early printing in England upon a sure basis.
# Men of the Time, eleventh edition/Blackwell, Elizabeth

Layout 2
​BLACKWELL, Elizabeth, born in Bristol, England, Feb. 3, 1821. Her father, in 1832, removed to the United States, where he died in 1838, leaving his widow and nine children almost penniless. Miss Blackwell aided in their support by teaching, at the same time studying medicine at Charleston, South Carolina, and at Philadelphia. She applied for admission to a number of medical schools, but was refused by all, except those of Castleton, Vermont, and Geneva, New York, and at the latter she was matriculated in 1847, and in 1849 received the first medical degree conferred upon a woman in the United States. After her graduation she spent a year and a half in the Maternité Hospital of Paris, and that of St. Bartholomew in London, and in 1851 established herself as a physician, mainly in the treatment of women and children, at New York, where, in 1857, she founded an infirmary for women and children, having also a large private practice. She has published "The Laws of Life," 1852; "Counsel to Parents on the Moral Education of their Children," 1879; and other professional works. In 1859 she again visited England, and delivered a course of medical lectures. Her younger sister, Emily Blackwell, took her degree of M.D. in 1854, completed her studies in the hospitals of New York, Edinburgh, Paris, and London, and is connected with the New York Infirmary for Women and Children.
# Men of the Time, eleventh edition/Blackley, William Lewery

Layout 2
​BLACKLEY, The Rev. William Lewery, M.A., is the second son of the late Travers R. Blackley, Esq., of Ashtown Lodge, Phoenix Park, Dublin. He was born at Dundalk, Ireland, Dec. 30, 1830, and received part of his early education on the Continent. Having entered Trinity College, Dublin, in his sixteenth year, he obtained his B.A. degree in 1850, and his M.A. in 1854, in which year he was ordained to the curacy of St. Peter's, Southwark; on leaving which charge shortly after, he became curate of Frensham, where, having remained thirteen years, he was promoted by Bishop Sumner in 1867 to the rectory of North Waltham, Hants, which he still holds. In 1857 he published his metrical translation from the Swedish, of Bishop Tegner's famous poem, "The Frithjof Saga." This was followed by the publication of his "Practical German Dictionary," which, in its original and abridged forms, has passed through many editions. In 1867 he published his "Critical English New Testament," and his volume on "Word Gossip" followed in 1869. He also wrote for the National Society the Teacher's Manual, "How to Teach Domestic Economy," 1879; and "The Social Economy Reading Book," 1881. It was not, however, till the end of 1878 that the essay was published destined to bring his name into such prominence in public notice as it now occupies. It appeared in the November issue for that year of the Nineteenth Century, under the title of "National Insurance, a cheap, practical and popular way of preventing Pauperism," and immediately attracted an extraordinary share of public attention. A remarkable sermon, preached by Mr. Blackley in Westminster Abbey, in Sept. 1879, on "Our National Improvidence," also attracted much notice. The National Providence League was formed in 1880, for the purpose of educating public opinion on the subject of National Insurance; and a great number of public meetings have been held, in which the proposals have been discussed. Mr. Blackley's proposals have reached far beyond this country, with the result that movements more or less upon his lines have been started in France, Switzerland, Italy, Germany, and New Zealand.
# Men of the Time, eleventh edition/Blackmore, Richard Doddridge

Layout 2
​BLACKMORE, Richard Doddridge, son of the Rev. John Blackmore, was born at Longworth, Berkshire, in 1825. His maternal grandmother was a grand-daughter of Dr. Doddridge. He was educated at Tiverton School, and Exeter College, Oxford, where he obtained a scholarship and graduated B.A. in 1847, taking a second class in classics. He was called to the bar at the Middle Temple in 1852, and afterwards practised as a conveyancer. He is the author of "Eric and Karine," "Epullia," "The ​Bugle of the Black Sea," and the following novels:—"Clara Vaughan," 1864; "Cradock Nowel: a Tale of the New Forest," 1866; "Lorna Doone: a Romance of Exmoor," 1869; "The Maid of Sker," 1872; "Alice Lorraine: a Tale of the South Downs," 1875; "Cripps the Carrier: a Woodland Tale," 1876; "Eréma; or, My Father's Sin," 1877; "Mary Anerley," 1880; and "Christowell: a Dartmoor tale," 1882. Mr. Blackmore has also published "The Fate of Franklin," a poem, 1860; "The Farm and Fruit of Old," a translation of the first and second Georgics of Virgil, 1862; and a translation of "The Georgics of Virgil," 1871.
# Men of the Time, eleventh edition/Blaine, James Gillespie

Layout 2
​BLAINE, James Gillespie, born in Washington County, Pennsylvania, Jan. 31, 1830. He entered the preparatory department of Washington College in his thirteenth year, and graduated in 1847 at the head of his class. He then went to Kentucky, where he was Professor of Mathematics in a military institute. Here he met his wife, who was from Maine, and at her persuasion removed to Augusta, Maine, where he has since resided. Adopting journalism as a profession, he became part owner and editor of the Kennebec Journal in 1854, and editor of the Portland Daily Advertiser in 1857. He was one of the organizers of the Republican party in Maine, and served in the State Legislature from 1858 to 1862, the last two years being Speaker. In 1862 he was elected a Representative in Congress, and was re-elected for each successive term until 1876. He was Speaker of the House of Representatives from 1869 to 1874, and was again the Republican ​candidate in 1875, but was defeated, the Democrats then having a majority in that body. In 1876 and in 1880 he was a candidate for the Republican nomination for President, but was defeated by Mr. Hayes in the one case and by Mr. Garfield in the other. In 1876 Mr. Blaine was appointed U.S. Senator from Maine to fill a vacancy, and was subsequently elected for the term expiring in 1883. This position he resigned in March, 1881, to accept the Secretaryship of State offered him by Mr. Garfield. The assassination of the latter caused Mr. Blaine to tender his resignation to Mr. Arthur, which was accepted, Dec., 1881. Since that date he has filled no office.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Cruickshank, George Edwin

​Cruickshank, George Edwin, M.A. (late scholar), St. John's Coll., Camb., 1874, equity draftsman and conveyancer, educated at Sydney Coll., Bath, a student of Lincoln's Inn 12 Nov., 1870 (then aged 22), called to the bar 7 June, 1873 (eldest son of George Cruickshank, Esq., of Combe Down, Somerset); born 22 Feb., 1848; married 29 Sept., 1880, Sarah Maria, 2nd dau. of late Joseph Savory Tylor, M.D.
    6, Lorton Terrace, Ladbroke Road, W.; 5, Stone Buildings, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Crump, Frederick Octavius

​Crump, Frederick Octavius, a member of the South-eastern circuit, author of Practice in the Supreme Court of Judicature, The Law of Marine Insurance, a student of the Middle Temple 11 June, 1864, called to the bar 30 April, 1867 (youngest son of Henry John Crump, late of Mil! Hill, Middlesex, chaplain to Dissenters' Grammar School); born , ; married 5 Sept., 1865, Isabel Teresa, youngest dau. of Rev. Charles Woodward, B.C.L.
    15, Stanley Crescent, Notting Hill, W.; 4, Elm Court, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Cuddon, James

​Cuddon, James, author of A Succinct Treatise on the Copyhold Acts, a student of the Middle Temple 6 June, 1834, called to the bar 30 April, 1862 (eldest son of James Cuddon, of Norwich, gentleman); born , 1816; married , 1842, Mary Anne Dorothy, dau. of late George Gardiner, Esq., of Thorpe, Norfolk, and has a son, Bernard James Cuddon-Fletcher (see Fletcher).
    7, Stone Buildings, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Cruickshank, Alexander Walmesley

​Cruickshank, Alexander Walmesley, joint magistrate and deputy collector North-west Provinces India, a student of the Middle Temple 14 Nov., 1870, called to the bar 17 Nov., 1883 (youngest son of James John Farquharson Cruickshank, late major H.E.I.C.S. engineers); born , .
    Aligarh. North-west Provinces India.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Crump, Charles Ashbrook Wright

​Crump, Charles Ashbrook Wright, B.A. Trin. Coll., Oxon, a student of the Inner Temple 15 April, 1853 (then aged 23), called to the bar 5 June, 1856 (eldest son of George Crump, Esq., of Great Field House, Kidderminster, co. Worcester); born , 1830.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Cruttwell, Charles James

​Cruttwell, Charles James, a student of the Inner Temple 10 Jan., 1833 (then aged 21), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1837 (eldest son of Clement Wilson Cruttwell, late of Bath, surgeon, dec.); born , 1812; married 2 Sept., 1846, Elizabeth Anne, eldest dau. of Capt. Sandars, R.N., of Devonport.
    15, Thistle Grove, South Kensington, S.W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Crowe, William Henry

​Crowe, William Henry, judge and sessions judge Satara, Bombay, a student of Lincoln's Inn 13 Nov., 1865 (then aged 21), called to the bar 7 June, 1875 (2nd son of Edward Frederick Crowe, of Hammersmith, mercer); born , 1844.
    Satara, Bombay.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Croxton, George

​Croxton, George, a member of the Western circuit, a student of the Middle Temple 22 Jan., 1825, called to the bar 7 May, 1847 (eldest son of William Croxton, Esq., of the East Indies); born , ; married 1st, 30 Jan., 1850, Jane, eldest surviving dau. of late John Hives, of Gledhow Grove, Yorks; he married 2ndly, 30 April, 1861, Mary Susanna, only surviving dau. of late W. B. May, Esq., of Hadlow Castle, Kent (and granddau. and sole heir of late J. Porter, Esq., of Fish Hall, Kent).
# Men-at-the-Bar/Cuddon-Fletcher, Bernard James

​Cuddon-Fletcher, Bernard James, J.P. Norfolk and Argyll, assumed the additional surname of Fletcher 1870, a student of the Middle Temple 2 Jan., 1862, called to the bar 18 Nov., 1867 (only son of James Cuddon, of London, conveyancer); born , 1846; married , 1869, Harriet, only surviving child and heir of late Angus Fletcher, of Dunans, N.B., and has issue.
    Somerton Hall, near Great Yarmouth; Dunans House, Colentraive, N.B.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Cuffe, Hon. Hamilton John Agmondesham

​Cuffe, Hon. Hamilton John Agmondesham, B.A. Trin. Coll., Camb., an assistant solicitor to the treasury since 1878, secretary to Judicature Acts Commission 1877, a student of the Inner Temple 10 Nov., 1869 (then aged 21), called to the bar 18 Nov., 1872 (2nd son of John Otway, 3rd earl of Desart); born 30 Aug., 1848; married 19 July, 1876, Lady Margaret Joan Lascelles, 2nd dau. of Henry Thynne, 4th earl of Harewood, and has issue (see Foster's Peerage).
    2, Rutland Gardens, S.W.
# Marshall v. United States (124 U.S. 391)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
124 U.S. 391
Marshall v. United States
R. B. Warden, for appellants.
Atty. Gen. Garland, Asst. Atty. Gen. Howard, and F. P. Dewees, for appellee.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court: The contention in behalf of the appellants is that, under section 1274, a colonel, upon being retired, should receive 75 per centum of the pay of his rank or grade on the active list, and, in addition thereto, such longevity increase pay as length of service shall entitle him to under section 1262, without regard to what his current pay might have been had he remained on the active list. It is insisted that Col. Marshall was entitled to receive, after 5 years service from July 1, 1870, $2,887.50,-that is, $2,625, or 75 per centum of the colonels' grade pay of $3,500, and $262.50, or 10 per centum of his current yearly pay during that period; and, upon the same basis, $3,176.25 after 10 years of service; $3,493.87, after 15 years of service; and $3,675, after 20 years of service-the increase stopping at the last sum, by reason of the provision in section 1263, that the total amount of longevity increase shall not exceed 40 per cent. of the yearly pay of the grade.
The construction of the statutes which this view would require cannot be sustained. When it is provided, in respect to officers in active service, that in no case shall be 'pay of a colonel exceed four thousand five hundred dollars a year,' and that 'officers retired from active service shall receive seventy-five per centum of the pay of the rank upon which they are retired,' there is no room left for construction. Col. Marshall was retired upon the rank of colonel. The annual maximum pay of that rank was and is $4,500. He received 75 per centum of that maximum pay, and, therefore, received all that congress authorized to be paid to him as a colonel on the retired list. Judgment affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Marshall v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Marshall v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Marshall v. United States (124 U.S. 391)
* Marshall v. United States (131 U.S. 391)
* Marshall v. United States (360 U.S. 310)
See also United States v. Marshall.
# Marshall v. Pletz
## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
317 U.S. 383
Marshall v. Pletz
Argued: Nov. 19, 1942. --- Decided: Jan 4, 1943
Mr. Robert T. Mautz, of Portland, Or., for petitioners.
Mr. William P. Lord, of Portland, Or., for respondent.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Marshall v. The Adriatio

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
107 U.S. 512
Marshall v. The Adriatio
Wm. Allen Butler, Thos. E. Stillman, and Thos. H. Hubbard, for appellants.
E. P. Wheeler and Joe. H. Choate, for appellee.
FIELD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Marshall v. United States (124 U.S. 391)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
124 U.S. 391
Marshall v. United States

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Marshall v. United States (131 U.S. 391)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
131 U.S. 391
Marshall v. United States
Asst. Atty. Gen. Howard, for the United States.
W. D. Davidge, for appellants.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER, on the 19th of November, 1888, announced that a majority of the court adhered to the views expressed by Mr. Justice HARLAN in the opinion of the court in this case delivered at the last term, affirming the judgment of the court of claims.
Affirmed.
Mr. Justice HARLAN stated that he now believed that that opinion was wrong, and that he dissented from the judgment of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mills v. Scott

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
99 U.S. 25
Mills v. Scott
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Walter S.C.hisholm for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. A. T. Akerman for the defendant in error.
MR. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mills v. Smith/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
75 U.S. 27
Mills v. Smith
The counsel, in their arguments in this case, seem to have forgotten that this court have no right to order a new trial because they may believe that the jury may have erred in their verdict on the facts. If the court below have given proper instructions on the questions of law, and submitted the facts to the jury, there is no further remedy in this court for any supposed mistake of the jury.
On examining the charge of the court below, we find a clear exposition of the legal questions arising in the case.
The jury were properly instructed that the deed of Parmely, the patentee, to Edwin Lacy, in 1837, would confer a good legal title on the plaintiff independently of the recording laws. But as this deed was not recorded, the question to be determined was, whether the defendant, who claimed title under the same patentee, through a deed dated 14th of August, 1855, and recorded, was a bon a fide purchaser without notice, and had paid value for the land. It was contended that a recital in a deed from Parmely to one Andrew Lacy, after the deed to James Lombard was recorded, and under which the defendant claims, would operate as constructive notice to a third party. But the court instructed the jury that it was necessary that the purchaser should have actual notice of the previous deed, or of some fact which would satisfy a prudent man that there had been a transfer of the land. In conclusion, after various propositions for specific instructions, amounting substantially to the instructions already given, the court summed up by telling the jury, that they would see that the question turned entirely on the view which they might take from the evidence, upon the fact whether Benjamin Lombard, Jr., and the defendant were purchasers in good faith, without notice. 'If either of them is a purchaser in good faith,' said the court, 'then the defendant is protected. You must find that they both had knowledge before you can find a verdict for the plaintiff. If they both had knowledge of this pre-existing title, then, as a matter of course, the plaintiff's title stands good, otherwise not.'
We see no error in these instructions.
After having thus correctly submitted the case to the consideration of the jury, the court were not bound to answer a catechism of questions which could only confuse their minds and lead to erroneous conclusions.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mills v. Stoddard

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
49 U.S. 345
Mills v. Stoddard

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mills v. The Bank of the United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
24 U.S. 431
Mills v. The Bank of the United States
March 8th.
THIS cause war argued by Mr. Wright for the plaintiff in error and by Mr. Webster for the defendants in error. March 13th.
Mr. Justice STORY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Hay, James

​Hay, James, B.A., LL.B. Trin. Hall, Camb., a student of the Inner Temple 7 Nov., 1877 (then aged 22), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1881 (eldest son of Alex. Hay, member of Legislative Council South Australia); born 1855.
    South Australia.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Hawkshaw, Henry Paul

​Hawkshaw, Henry Paul, M.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1872, a student of Lincoln's Inn 18 Jan., 1868 (then aged 25), called to the bar 6 June, 1871 (2nd son of Sir John Hawkshaw, of London, civil engineer); born , 1843.
    58, Jermyn Street, S.W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Hawkins, Anthony Nicholl

​Hawkins, Anthony Nicholl, a student of the Middle Temple 30 Jan., 1829, called to the bar 31 Jan., 1834 (2nd son of Antony Montonier Hawkins, of London, M.D.); born 14 April, 1809.
    10, Montagu Place, Montagu Square, W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Hawkins, Charles Edward

​Hawkins, Charles Edward, equity draftsman and conveyancer, a student of the Middle Temple 10 Jan., 1846, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1849 (3rd son of John Hawkins, of Hitchin, Herts, gentleman); born .
    5, New Square, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Hawkins, Francis Vaughan

​Hawkins, Francis Vaughan, M.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1857, equity draftsman and conveyancer, author of A Concise Treatise on the Construction of Wills, a student of Lincoln's Inn 5 Dec., 1850 (then aged 17), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1856 (eldest son of Francis Hawkins, of London, M.D.); born , 1833 (see Foster's Baronetage).
    5, Lancaster Street, Hyde Park, W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Hawkins, Henry Charlton

​Hawkins, Henry Charlton, M.A., B.C.L. New Coll., Oxon, 1884, equity draftsman and conveyancer, a student of Lincoln's Inn 16 Nov., 1877 (then aged 21), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1882 (only son of John William Hawkins, late chief clerk to the master of the rolls); born 2 June, 1856.
    7, New Square, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Hawkins, Christopher Stuart

​Hawkins, Christopher Stuart, J.P. Devon, a student of Lincoln's Inn 12 Nov., 1846 (then aged 23), called to the bar 14 Nov., 1851 (only son of Abraham Mills Hawkins, of Dodbrooke, Devon, capt. R.N.); born 1823.
    Alston House, Plympton St. Mary, Devon.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Hawkins, Sidney Barrington Robson

​Hawkins, Sidney Barrington Robson, a student of the Inner Temple 10 Nov., 1873 (then aged 25), called to the bar 9 May, 1882 (3rd son of Charles Sidney Hawkins, Esq., of Cheltenham and Cantlowes, Middlesex, J.P., D.L.); born , 1848.
    2, Essex Court, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Haworth-Booth, Col. Benjamin Blaydes

​Haworth-Booth, Col. Benjamin Blaydes, M.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1849, twenty-fifth wrangler 1846, was a member of the Northern circuit, It.-col. 1st brigade Yorkshire artillery volunteers since 1861, assumed the additional surname of Booth by royal licence , 1869, J.P., D.L. Yorkshire East Riding, a student of Lincoln's Inn 20 April, 1846, went to the Inner Temple 26 May, 1849, where he was called to the bar 8 June, 1849 (eldest son of Benjamin Haworth, Esq., of Hull Bank House, Yorks); born at Rowlston 7 June, 1823; married 28 July, 1853, Cordelia, 2nd dau. of late Rev. FitzGerald Wintour, prebendary of Southwell (by his wife Jane Dayrell, niece of 1st Lord Wenlock), and has issue.
    Hull Bank House, Hull; Brooks' and University Clubs.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Haycraft, Thomas Wagstaffe

​Haycraft, Thomas Wagstaffe, B.A. St. John's Coll., Oxon, a student of the Inner Temple 19 April, 1882 (then aged 23), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1885 (2nd son of John Bury Haycraft, of Surbiton, Surrey); born , 1859.
    Surbiton, Surrey.