OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Browne, Lt.-Col. Andrew Duncan Montague

​BROWNE, Lt.-Col. Andrew Duncan Montague, D.S.O. (1917); served in S. African War, 1899-1902; D.A.A. and Q.M.G., 1914-16; A.A. and Q.M.G., 1916; Major (Brevet Lt.-Col., 1918), King's Own Lane. Regt. from 1915: son of late Major-Gen. Andrew Smythe Montague Browne, D.L., J.P., of St. John's Point, Co. Down: b. 1878: m. 1915, Violet E. Garrard. Res.: St. John's Point, Killough, Co. Down.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Browne, Major Dominick Sidney

​BROWNE, Major Dominick Sidney, Educ.: Eton and Oxford; D.L., J.P., Co. Mayo (High Sheriff, 1896); late Capt. and Hon. Major 3rd Batt. Royal Scots Fusiliers; served in S. African War, 1900-02, 1st with 2nd/1st Scots Fusiliers, and then with 12th (Scottish) M.T.; in Great War, 1914-18, as District Purchaser Remounts 8th Batt. Royal Scots Fusiliers, and Asst. Embarkation Staff Officer; son of late Dominick Andrew Browne, D.L., J.P., of Breaghwv, Co. Mayo; b. 1st March, 1866; m. 1895, Naomi, eldest dau. of Hon. R. R. Dobell, P.C, M.P., of Beauvoir Manor, Quebec, and has issue three daus. and a son, Dominick Andrew Sidney, b. 29th Feb., 1904. Recns.: shooting and fishing. Res.: Breaghwy, Castlebar, Co. Mayo. Kildare Street Club, Dublin: Carlton, Orleans and Royal Automobile Club, London.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Browne-Clayton, Lieut.-Col. Robert Clayton

​BROWNE-CLAYTON, Lieut.-Col. Robert Clayton, D.L., J.P., Co. Carlow; served in S. African War, 1899-1902; European War, 1914-16: Major, 5th Lancers, 1907-9, ret. p. 1909; Major (Brevet Lieut.-Col., 1917), S. Irish Horse (special res.), from 1909: eldest son of late Wm. Clayton Browne-Clayton, J.P., D.L., of Browne's Hill, Co, Carlow; b. 1870; m. 1905, Magdalene, dau. of E. Wienholt, of Jondaryan, Queensland, Res.: Browne's Hill, Carlow.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Browning, Lieut.-Col. Winthropp Benjamin

​BROWNING, Lieut.-Col. Winthropp Benjamin, C.I.E. (1898), L.R.C.P. & S.I.; entered Indian Med. Ser., 1880; Surg.-Maj., 1892; Lt.-Col., 1900; retired, 1910; has been Asst. Physician and first Physician to Madras Gen. Hospital, 2nd Surg. and first Surg. there, Surg. to Royapettah Hospital; Professor of Hygiene, Materia Medica, Medical Jurisprudence, and Surgery at Madras Med. College: Surg. to three successive Govts. of Madras; Principal of Madras Med. Coll.; Pres. of Board of Examiners thereof, and Senior Med. Officer Madras Gen. Hospital; son of late Benjamin Winthrop Browning, of Baggotstown, Co. Limerick; b. 1855; m. 1887, Annie Georgina, eldest dau. of Col. Kenlis F. Stevenson. Res.: Cregg House, Fermov, Co. Cork.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Bruce, Sir Hervey Ronald

​BRUCE, Sir Hervey Ronald, Baronet (Unit. Kgd., 1804); J.P., D.L., Co. Londonderry; late Capt. Irish Gds.; Major. Roy. Irish R.; served in S. Africa, 1899-1902; eldest son of Sir Hervey Juckes Lloyd, 4th Bart., and Ellen Maud (O.B.E.), youngest dau. of Percy Ricardo, of Bramley Park, Guildford; b. 9th Dec, 1872; s. his father, 8th May, 1919; m. 1st, 1903, Ruth Isabel (d. 1915). dau of H. C. Okeover; 2nd, 1916. Margaret Florence, dau. of Rev. Robert Jack.son, Rector of Little Thurlow, Newmarket; issue, two sons and a dau. Res.: Downhill, Co. Londonderry; Clifton Hall, Nottingham.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Bruen, Henry

​BRUEN, Henry, son of late Right Hon. Henry Bruen, of Oak Park, Carlow, D.L.. Co. Carlow; m. 1886, Agnes M., dau. of late Right Hon. Arthur McMurrough Kavanagh, of Borris House, Co. Carlow; late Lieut. R. A.: educated at Harrow and R.M.A., Woolwich. Recns.: golfing, shooting. Res.: Oak Park, Carlow. Clubs: Naval and Military, London, and Kildare Street, Dublin.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Browne, Sir John Walton

​BROWNE, Sir John Walton, Knt. (1921), M.D., LL.D., Hon. M.R.C.S., Eng.; D.L. for Belfast; Consulting Surgeon, Royal Hospital, Belfast; Surgeon Ophthalmic Hospital, Belfast; Senator. Queen's University of Belfast; Ex-President, Ulster Medical Society: Ex-President, North of Ireland Branch, B.M.A.; Medical Referee, Workman's Compensation Act: eldest son of late Dr. S. Brownie, R. N.; b. 1845; m. 1st, Fanny (d.——), dau. of David Anderson, of Strandtown, Belfast; 2nd, Matilda, dau. of Rev. Francis B. Grant, M.A., of Barbados. Res.: Lismore, Windsor Avenue, Belfast.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Browne, Nassau Blair

​BROWNE, Nassau Blair, R.H.A., Secretary and Trustee, Royal Hibernian Academy of Arts; Governor and Trustee, National Gallery of Ireland. Res,: 31 Victoria Road, Rathgar, Dublin.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Browne, Hon. John Francis Archibald

​BROWNE, Hon. John Francis Archibald; elder son and heir of 5th Baron Kilmaine; b. 22nd Sept., 1902.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Brownlow, Major Guy James

​BROWNLOW, Major Guy James, D.S.O. (1917), Capt. and Brevet-Major Rifle Brigade; served in European War, 1914-18; son of late Claud Brownlow, of Coolderry, Carrickmacross, Co. Monaghan; b. 1883; m. 1920, Elinor, widow of Major M. Campbell, M.C., Connaught Rangers. Army and Navy Club, London.
# Thomas v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
261 U.S. 481
Thomas v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Argued: March 9-12, 1923. --- Decided: April 9, 1923
Messrs. James D. Head, of Texarkana, Ark., Otis Wing, of De Queen, Ark., and Henry Moore, Jr., of Texarkana, Ark., for appellants.
Messrs. S. W. Moore, of New York City, and James B. McDonough, of Ft. Smith, Ark., for appellees.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Thomas v. Hempt Bros.

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
345 U.S. 19
Thomas v. Hempt Bros.
Argued: Feb. 3, 1953. --- Decided: March 9, 1953
Mr. Henry C. Kessler, Jr., York, Pa., for petitioner.
Mr. James H. Booser, Harrisburg, Pa., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Thomas v. Iowa

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
209 U.S. 258
Thomas v. Iowa
Argued: February 26, 1908. --- Decided: March 23, 1908
Messrs. Chester C. Cole and John T. Mulvaney for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 259 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Charles W. Lyon, H. W. Byers, and E. B. Evans for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 260 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Moody delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Thomas v. Hempt Bros./Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
345 U.S. 19
Thomas v. Hempt Bros.
Argued: Feb. 3, 1953. --- Decided: March 9, 1953
The petitioner Thomas sued the respondent Hempt Brothers in a Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas to recover overtime wages, liquidated damages, and counsel fees under the provisions of §§ 6, 7 and 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The complaint alleged these facts: Hempt Brothers operate a stone quarry in Pennsylvania, use the stone in manufacturing cement mixtures, and then haul these mixtures in trucks to customers. Their customers were the Pennsylvania Turnpike, the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, an airport, an army depot, and a navy depot, all located within the state of Pennsylvania. The concrete was processed for use by these customers on Pennsylvania projects. The Railroad used its concrete for repair and maintenance of its roadbeds over which were operated interstate passenger and freight trains. The Turnpike used its concrete for laying and building 'a highway which handles the flow of commerce between the states.' The airport used concrete to build and erect landing fields to accommodate the flow of airplanes in interstate commerce. Other purchasers used their concrete on 'projects which aided the flow of commerce, as will be proven by Plaintiff when he has his day in Court.' Thomas was employed in producing and handling the quarry and concrete products.
On these allegations the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania sustained the trial court's judgment for Hempt Brothers entered on the ground that the complaint failed to show a recoverable cause of action under the Fair Labor Standards Act. 371 Pa. 383, 89 A.2d 776. And see 1948, 62 Pa.Dist. & Co. 618, 626; and 1950, 74 Pa.Dist. & Co. 213, 218. In sustaining dismissal of the complaint the State Supreme Court recognized that its holding was in conflict with that of the Third Circuit in Tobin v. Alstate Construction Co., 195 F.2d 577. We granted certiorari because of this conflict. 344 U.S. 895, 73 S.Ct. 276.
We have today affirmed the Court of Appeals' judgment in the Alstate case. The reasons we gave for affirming that case require that this case be reversed because the state courts erred in holding that the complaint failed to set out a good cause of action under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Accordingly the judgment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is reversed and the cause remanded to that court for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Reversed and remanded.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER and Mr. Justice DOUGLAS dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in No. 296, Alstate Construction Co. v. Durkin, 345 U.S. 13, 73 S.Ct. 565.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Treadwell Construction Company v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 772
Treadwell Construction Company v. United States
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania for further consideration in light of Weyerhaeuser Steamship Company v. United States, 372 U.S. 597, 83 S.Ct. 926.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tray

Layout 2
Sing me a hero! Quench my thirst
Of soul, ye bards!
 Quoth Bard the first:
"Sir Olaf, the good knight, did don
His helm and eke his habergeon . . ." Sir Olaf and his bard——!
"That sin-scathed brow" (quoth Bard the second)
"That eye wide ope as though Fate beckoned
My hero to some steep, beneath
Which precipice smiled tempting death . . ."
You too without your host have reckoned!
"A beggar-child" (let's hear this third!)
"Sat on a quay's edge: like a bird
Sang to herself at careless play,
And fell into the stream. 'Dismay!
Help, you the standers-by!' None stirred.
"Bystanders reason, think of wives
And children ere they risk their lives.
Over the balustrade has bounced
A mere instinctive dog, and pounced
Plumb on the prize. 'How well he dives!
" 'Up he comes with the child, see, tight
In mouth, alive too, clutched from quite
A depth of ten feet—twelve, I bet!
Good dog! What, off again? There's yet
Another child to save? All right!
" 'How strange we saw no other fall!
It's instinct in the animal.
Good dog! But he's a long while under:
If he got drowned I should not wonder—
Strong current, that against the wall!
" 'Here he comes, holds in mouth this time
—What may the thing be? Well, that's prime!
Now, did you ever? Reason reigns
In man alone, since all Tray's pains
Have fished—the child's doll from the slime!'
"And so, amid the laughter gay,
Trotted my hero off,—old Tray,—
Till somebody, prerogatived
With reason, reasoned: 'Why he dived,
His brain would show us, I should say.
" 'John, go and catch—or, if needs be,
Purchase—that animal for me!
By vivisection, at expense
Of half-an-hour and eighteenpence,
How brain secretes dog's soul, we'll see!' "
# Trbovich v. United Mine Workers of America

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
404 U.S. 528
Trbovich v. United Mine Workers of America et al.
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
No. 71-119 Argued: November 18, 1971 --- Decided: January 17, 1972
Petitioner union member fought unsuccessfully to intervene pursuant to Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 24 (a) in litigation brought by the Secretary of Labor under Title IV of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act to set aside an election of union officers for violations of the Act. Petitioner, who initiated the entire enforcement proceeding with his complaint to the Secretary, sought to present evidence and argument in support of the Secretary's election challenge, and to urge additional grounds for setting the election aside.
Held:
    1. There is nothing in the language of Title IV of the Act or its legislative history to bar intervention by a union member in a post-election enforcement suit, so long as that intervention is limited to claims of illegality presented by the Secretary's complaint. Pp. 530-537.
    2. Intervention under Rule 24 (a) is warranted for this petitioner, as he may have a valid complaint about the performance of the Secretary, who protects not only the rights of individual union members but also the public interest in free and democratic union elections, two functions that may always dictate the same approach to the conduct of the litigation. Pp. 537-539.
Reversed and case remanded to the District Court with directions to allow limited intervention.
MARSHALL, J., delivered the opinion of the Court in which BURGER, C.J., and BRENNAN, STEWART, WHITE, and BLACKMUN, JJ., joined. DOUGLAS, J., filed an opinion dissenting in part, post, p. 539. POWELL and REHNQUIST, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were John Silard, Elliott C. Lichtman, Joseph A. Yablonski, and Clarice R. Feldman.
Solicitor General Griswold argued the case for respondent Secretary of Labor. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Gray, Harry R. Sachse, Walter H. Fleischer, Raymond D. Battocchi, Richard F. Schubert, George T. Avery, and Beate Bloch. Edward L. Carey, Harrison Combs, Willard P. Owens, Charles L. Widman, and M.E. Boiarsky filed a brief for respondent United Mine Workers of America.
Melvin L. Wulf and Sanford Jay Rosen filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union as amicus curiae urging reversal.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Treachery Act

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Treachery Act."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Treachery Act 1940 (United Kingdom)
* Treachery Act 1940 (Canada)

## See also

* Treason Act
* Section 80.1AC of the Criminal Code (Cth.), as inserted by the National Security Legislation Amendment (Espionage and Foreign Interference) Act 2018 (Cth.)
# Treadwell Construction Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 772
Treadwell Construction Company v. United States
Harold E. McCamey and Frederick T. M. Crowley, for petitioner.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick and Alan S. Rosenthal, for the United States.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Trbovich v. United Mine Workers of America/Dissent Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Douglas
United States Supreme Court
404 U.S. 528
TRBOVICH, Petitioner, v. UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA et al.
Argued: Nov. 18, 1971. --- Decided: Jan 17, 1972
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, dissenting in part.
I join the opinion of the Court to the extent that it holds that Title IV of the Landrum-Griffin Act does not bar intervention by union members, pursuant to Fed.Rule Civ.Proc. 24(a), in suits initiated by the Secretary of Labor challenging union elections. I differ from the majority, however, in that I would also permit the union members in this case to raise their additional grounds for setting aside the disputed election. In my view, the limited intervention granted by the majority serves neither the purpose of the liberalizing 1966 amendments to Rule 24, nor the twin purposes of Title IV-to preserve unions from a multiplicity of frivolous election challenges, and also to centralize in a single proceeding such litigation as might be warranted with respect to a single election.
Here, the Secretary has served his screening function. He has decided that petitioner's election challenge is meritorious. The Court concedes, moreover, that the burden on the union to defend against the additional claims would not be particularly burdensome, compared to the onus of an independent action. Ante, at 537. These claims relate squarely to the election whose legality the union must defend. I would permit them to be heard.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# True lover's garland (1)

The True Lover’s Garland, CONTAINING, Will’s Courtship, and Katie’s Victory. The Laughing Song. Shannon's Flowery Banks. AND The Lass at the Mill.
Falkirk: Printed by T. Johnston, 1817.
* Will's Courtship, and Katie's Victory
* The Laughing Song
* Shannon's Flowery Banks
* The Lass at the Mill
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# To Nancy F——

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
From Notebook c.1808-1811 p.27. See also: Satiric verses and epigrams.

#### Edited text:

To Nancy F[laxman]
How can I help thy Husband's copying Me?
Should that make difference 'twixt me & Thee?
________________________________________

#### The original text:

To Nancy F——
How can I help thy Husbands copying Me
Should that make difference twixt me & Thee
________________________________________

## Notes

* ↑ "Blake Complete Writings", ed. Geoffrey Keynes, pub. OUP 1966/85, p. 539.
* ↑ "The Complete Poetry & Prose of William Blake", ed. by David V. Erdman, Anchor Books, 1988, p. 507.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# To Nature

1820 (not published in his lifetime)
It may indeed be phantasy, when I Essay to draw from all created things Deep, heartfelt, inward joy that closely clings ; And trace in leaves and flowers that round me lie Lessons of love and earnest piety. So let it be ; and if the wide world rings In mock of this belief, it brings Nor fear, nor grief, nor vain perplexity. So will I build my altar in the fields, And the blue sky my fretted dome shall be, And the sweet fragrance that the wild flower yields Shall be the incense I will yield to Thee, Thee only God ! and thou shalt not despise Even me, the priest of this poor sacrifice.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# To One in Hospital Pent

"Little sister, everywhere"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "To One in Hospital Pent" in Harper's Magazine (July 1916).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "To One in Hospital Pent" in Poems I.

## References

* ↑ View this version at Google Books.
# To Our Mocking-Bird

Sidney Lanier composed this poem in 1878 while he was living in Baltimore, Maryland. See also Lanier’s poem The Mockingbird.
I.
Trillets of humor,—shrewdest whistle-wit,—  Contralto cadences of grave desire  Such as from off the passionate Indian pyre Drift down through sandal-odored flames that split About the slim young widow who doth sit  And sing above,—midnights of tone entire,—  Tissues of moonlight shot with songs of fire;— Bright drops of tune, from oceans infinite Of melody, sipped off the thin-edged wave And trickling down the beak,—discourses brave  Of serious matter that no man may guess,—  Good-fellow greetings, cries of light distress—  All these but now within the house we heard:  O Death, wast thou too deaf to hear the bird?
II.
Ah me, though never an ear for song, thou hast  A tireless tooth for songsters: thus of late  Thou camest, Death, thou Cat! and leap’st my gate, And, long ere Love could follow, thou hadst passed Within and snatched away, how fast, how fast,  My bird—wit, songs, and all—thy richest freight  Since that fell time when in some wink of fate Thy yellow claws unsheathed and stretched, and cast Sharp hold on Keats, and dragged him slow away, And harried him with hope and horrid play—  Ay, him, the world’s best wood-bird, wise with song—  Till thou hadst wrought thine own last mortal wrong.  ’Twas wrong! ’twas wrong! I care not, wrong’s the word—  To munch our Keats and crunch our mocking-bird.
III.
Nay, Bird; my grief gainsays the Lord’s best right.  The Lord was fain, at some late festal time,  That Keats should set all Heaven’s woods in rhyme, And thou in bird-notes. Lo, this tearful night, Methinks I see thee, fresh from death’s despite,  Perched in a palm-grove, wild with pantomime,  O’er blissful companies couched in shady thyme, —Methinks I hear thy silver whistlings bright Mix with the mighty discourse of the wise,  Till broad Beethoven, deaf no more, and Keats, ’Midst of much talk, uplift their smiling eyes,  And mark the music of thy wood-conceits,  And halfway pause on some large, courteous word,  And call thee “Brother”, O thou heavenly Bird!
# To Myself

       Let nothing make thee sad or fretful,
       Or too regretful;
       Be still;
       What God hath ordered must be right;
       Then find in it thine own delight,
       My will.
       Why shouldst thou fill today with sorrow
       About tomorrow.
       My heart?
       One watches all with care most true;
       Doubt not that he will give thee too
       Thy part.
       Only be steadfast; never waver,
       Nor seek earth's favor,
       But rest:
       Thou knowest what God's will must be
       For all his creatures, so for thee,
       The best.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# To Nobodaddy

From Notebook, p. 109, reversed. See also Songs and Ballads
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# To One Unknown

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "To One Unknown."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "To One Unknown", a poem by Mary Caroline Denver and Jane Campbell Denver
* "To One Unknown", a poem by Hattie Howard