OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume III/Moral Treatises of St. Augustin/Of the Work of Monks/Section 7

7. But lest any should fancy that this was granted only to the twelve, see also what Luke relateth: “After these things,” saith he, “the Lord chose also other seventy and two, and sent them by two and two before His face into every city and place whither He was about to come. And He said unto them, The harvest indeed is plentiful, but the laborers few: ask ye therefore the Lord of the harvest, that He would send forth laborers into His harvest. Go your ways: behold, I send you as lambs in the midst of wolves. Carry neither purse nor scrip nor shoes, and salute no man by the way. Into whatsoever house ye shall enter, first say, Peace be to this house. And if the son of peace be there, your peace shall rest upon him: if not, it shall return to you. And in the same house remain, eating and drinking such things as are with them: for the workman is worthy of his hire.” Here it appears that these things were not commanded, but permitted, that whoso should choose to use, might use that which was lawful unto him by the Lord’s appointment; but if any should not choose to use it, he would not do contrary to a thing commanded, but would be yielding up his own right, by demeaning himself more mercifully and laboriously in the Gospel in the which he would not accept even the hire which was his due. Otherwise the Apostle did contrary to a command of the Lord: for, after he had shown it to be lawful unto him, he hath straightway subjoined, “But yet have I not used this power.”

## Footnotes

* ↑ Luke x. 1–7
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume III/Moral Treatises of St. Augustin/On Care to Be Had for the Dead/Section 10

10. This affection the Martyrs of Christ contending for the truth did overcome: and it is no marvel that they despised that whereof they should, when death was overpast, have no feeling, when they could not by those tortures, which while alive they did feel, be overcome. God was able, no doubt, (even as He permitted not the lion when it had slain the Prophet, to touch his body further, and of a slayer made it to be a keeper): He was able, I say, to have kept the slain bodies of His own from the dogs to which they had been flung; He was able in innumerable ways to have deterred the rage of the men themselves, that to burn the carcases, to scatter the ashes, they should not dare: but it was fit that this experience also should not be lacking to manifold variety of temptations, lest the fortitude of confession which would not for the saving of the life of the body give way to the savageness of persecution, should be tremblingly anxious for the honor of a sepulchre: in a word, lest faith of resurrection should dread the consuming of the body. It was fit then, that even these things should be permitted, in order that, even after these examples of so great horror, the Martyrs, fervent in confession of Christ, should become witnesses of this truth also, in which they had learned that they by whom their bodies should be slain had after that no more that they could do. Because, whatever they should do to dead bodies, they would after all do nothing, seeing that in flesh devoid of all life, neither was it possible for him to feel aught who had thence departed, nor for Him to lose aught thereof, Who created the same. But while these things were doing to the bodies of the slain, albeit the Martyrs, not frightened by them, did with great fortitude suffer, yet among the brethren was there exceeding sorrow, because there was given them no means of paying the last honors to the remains of the Saints, neither secretly to withdraw any part thereof, (as the same history testifies,) did the watchings of cruel sentinels permit. So, while those which had been slain, in the tearing asunder of their limbs, in the burning up of their bones, in the dispersion of their ashes, could feel no misery; yet these who had nothing of them that they could bury, did suffer torture of exceeding grief in pitying them; because what those did in no sort feel, these in some sort did feel for them, and where was henceforth for those no more suffering, yet these did in woful compassion suffer for them.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Matt. x. 28
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume III/Moral Treatises of St. Augustin/Of the Work of Monks/Translator's Preface

From the Retractations, ii. 21.
To write the Book on the Work of Monks, the need which compelled me was this. When at Carthage there had begun to be monasteries, some maintained themselves by their own hands, obeying the Apostle; but others wished so to live on the oblations of the faithful, that doing no work whence they might either have or supply the necessaries of life, they thought and boasted that they did rather fulfill the precept of the Gospel, where the Lord saith, Behold the fowls of heaven, and the lilies of the field, (Matt. vi. 26). Whence also among laics of inferior purpose, but yet fervent in zeal, there had begun to arise tumultuous contests, whereby the Church was troubled, some defending the one, others the other part. Add to this, that some of them who were for not working, wore their hair long. Whence contentions between those who reprehended and those who justified the practice, were, according to their party affections, increased. On these accounts the venerable old Aurelius, Bishop of the Church of the same city, desired me to write somewhat of this matter; and I did so. This Book begins, “Jussioni tuæ, sancte frater Aureli.”
This work is placed in the Retractations next after that “On the Good of Marriage” which belongs to the year 401.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume III/Moral Treatises of St. Augustin/On Care to Be Had for the Dead/Section 11

11. In regard to that woful compassion which I have mentioned, are those praised, and by king David blessed, who to the dry bones of Saul and Jonathan afforded mercy of sepulture. But yet what mercy is that, which is afforded to them that have feeling of nothing? Or haply is this to be challenged back to that conceit of an infernal river which men unburied were not able to pass over? Far be this from the faith of Christians: else hath it gone most ill with so great a multitude of Martyrs, for whom there could be no burying of their bodies, and Truth did cheat them when It said, “Fear not them which kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do,” if these have been able to do to them so great evils, by which they were hindered to pass over to the places which they longed for. But, because this without all doubt is most false, and it neither any whit hurts the faithful to have their bodies denied sepulture, nor any whit the giving of sepulture unto infidels advantageth them; why then are those who buried Saul and his son said to have done mercy, and for this are blessed by that godly king, but because it is a good affection with which the hearts of the pitiful are touched, when they grieve for that in the dead bodies of other men, which, by that affection through which no man ever hateth his own flesh, they would not have done after their own death to their own bodies; and what they would have done by them when they shall have no more feeling, that they take care to do by others now having no feeling while themselves have yet feeling?

## Footnotes

* ↑ 2 Sam. ii. 5
* ↑ Luke xii. 4
# Industrial Association of San Francisco v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
268 U.S. 64
Industrial Association of San Francisco v. United States
Argued: March 10, 1925. --- Decided: April 13, 1925
Mr. H. H. Phleger, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 65-67 intentionally omitted]
The Attorney General and Mr. A. T. Seymour, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 68-70 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Industrial Commission of Wisconsin v. McCartin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
330 U.S. 622
Industrial Commission of Wisconsin v. McCartin
Argued: Jan. 17, 1947 --- Decided: March 31, 1947
Mr. Mortimer Levitan, of Madison, Wis., for petitioner.
Mr. Lawrence E. Hart, of Madison, Wis., for respondents.
Mr. Justice MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Industrial Hemp Farming Act

Annual proposal introduced by Rep. Ron Paul reguarding the (re)classification of hemp. Language remains the same year to year - only the year changes in Section 1. See More.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 2, 2009 Mr. PAUL (for himself, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. CLAY, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. STARK, and Ms. WOOLSEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
HR 1866 IH 111th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1866 To amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from the definition of marihuana, and for other purposes.
A BILL To amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from the definition of marihuana, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

#### SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ‘Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2009’.

#### SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF INDUSTRIAL HEMP FROM DEFINITION OF MARIHUANA.

    Paragraph (16) of section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802(16)) is amended--
          (1) by striking ‘(16)’ at the beginning and inserting ‘(16)(A)’; and
          (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                ‘(B) The term ‘marihuana’ does not include industrial hemp. As used in the preceding sentence, the term ‘industrial hemp’ means the plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of such plant, whether growing or not, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration that does not exceed 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis.’.

#### SEC. 3. INDUSTRIAL HEMP DETERMINATION TO BE MADE BY STATES.

    Section 201 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 811) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
          ‘(i) Industrial Hemp Determination To Be Made by States- In any criminal action, civil action, or administrative proceeding, a State regulating the growing and processing of industrial hemp under State law shall have exclusive authority to determine whether any such plant meets the concentration limitation set forth in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (16) of section 102 and such determination shall be conclusive and binding.’.

## Legislative History
### Current

* H.R. 1866

### Previous

* H.R. 1009
* H.R. 3037
# Industrial Housing

Layout 2
THE BAYONNE
HOUSING CORPORATION
BAYONNE • NEW JERSEY
INDUSTRIAL
HOUSING
INDUSTRIAL
HOUSING
By
Andrew J. Thomas
THE BAYONNE
HOUSING CORPORATION
BAYONNE • NEW JERSEY
COPYRIGHT, I925, BY
THE BAYONNE HOUSING CORPORATION
First Edition, December, 1925
CURRIER & HARFORD LTD • NEW YORK
CONTENTS
PAGE
CHAPTER I
CHAPTER II
CHAPTER III
General plan
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1965, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 58 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Isobel Lenman v. Thomas Railroad Jones

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
222 U.S. 51
Isobel Lenman v. Thomas Railroad Jones
Argued: October 27, 1911. --- Decided: November 13, 1911
Mr. A. S. Worthington for appellant.
Messrs. J. J. Darlington and Hugh H. Obear for appellee.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Johnson v. Keith/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
117 U.S. 199
Johnson v. Keith
Argued: March 8, 1886. ---
This motion is granted. A judgment of reversal, accompanied by an order remanding the cause for a retrial, is not a final judgment for the purposes of a writ of error to this court. Houston v. Moore, 3 Wheat. 433; Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff, 106 U.S. 4, S.C.. 1 Sup. Ct. Rep. 15, and cases there cited.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Johnson v. Louisiana/Concurrence Blackmun

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Blackmun Powell
* Dissenting Opinions Douglas Brennan Stewart Marshall
[p365] MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN, concurring.
I join the Court's opinion and judgment in each of these cases. I add only this comment, which should be [p366] obvious and should not need saying, that in so doing I do not imply that I regard a State's split-verdict system as a wise one. My vote means only that I cannot conclude that the system is constitutionally offensive. Were I a legislator, I would disfavor it as a matter of policy. Our task here, however, is not to pursue and strike down what happens to impress us as undesirable legislative policy.
I do not hesitate to say, either, that a system employing a 7-5 standard, rather than a 9-3 or 75% minimum, would afford me great difficulty. As MR. JUSTICE WHITE points out, ante, at 362, "a substantial majority of the jury" are to be convinced. That is all that is before us in each of these cases.

## Notes

* ↑ [This opinion applies also to No. 69-5046, Apodaca et al. v. Oregon, post, p. 404.]
# Jersey Journal/1944/Norton Fighting With 90th Division

* related portals: Vincent Gerard Norton.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, travel guide, Wikidata item.
Vincent Gerard Norton (1923-2005) in The Jersey Journal on November 29, 1944.
Norton Fighting With 90th Division. P.F.C. Vincent G. Norton is now fighting in France with the famous 90th Division, one of the first divisions to land in the invasion of the continent. His regiment, commanded by Col. Christian H. Clarke Jr., and his division, have received much praise for magnificent contributions to the battle of France. The 90th Division gained its fame in combat among the hedgerows of Normandy in the early days of the invasion and later the famous battle of Foret de Mont Castre. The same outfit figured in the capture of the important city of Le Mans and was instrumental in the closing of the bloody Falaise Gap and the resulting capture of several thousand German prisoners. P.F.C. Norton joined the Division July 3, 1944, and has participated in some of this Division's many big battles across France. This soldier is a crack rifleman in a rifle squad of the well known K. Co. Kraut Killers, and wears the combat infantryman's badge awarded only to combat infantryman fighters.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works could have had their copyright renewed between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st of the 29th year.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jersey Journal/1945/Sgt. George Steurer Takes California Girl for Bride

Adelma Marie Tandberg and George Robert Steurer (1924-1995) in the Jersey Journal on June 7, 1945.
Sgt. George Steurer Takes California Girl for Bride. Gunner Holds Air Medal, Presidential Citation. Miss Adelma Tandbergh, daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Ralph Tandbergh of Long Beach, California, formerly of Union City, became the bride of Sgt. George Steurer, U. S. Army Air Force, son of Mr. and Mrs. G. A. Steurer, 10 50th street, Weehawken last Friday in St. Olav's Lutheran Church, Weehawken. Rev. T. J. Alvestad, pastor, performed the ceremony. The bride wore a while crepe street-length dress with matching accessories and had a corsage of red roses and lily-of-the-valley. Miss Kay Caparello of Long Beach, maid of honor, was attired in blue crepe and had a corsage of pink roses. Staff Sgt. James H. McKee of Weehawken, who recently returned with the bridegroom from England, was best man. After a reception at the Steurer home, the couple left on a short trip. Both will return to Atlantic City, where the bridegroom is stationed. The bride attended Union City schools and is a graduate of a Detroit, Michigan high school. Sgt. Steurer, a graduate of Weehawken High School, has been in service 2 years, 9 months of which were spent with the Eighth Air Force as an aerial gunner in European theater of war. He has received the Air Medal with 2 Oak Leaf Clusters and the Presidential Citation with 1 Cluster.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works could have had their copyright renewed between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st of the 29th year.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jersey Journal/1944/Wounded Second Time

Owen J. Burke (1915-1984) in The Jersey Journal on November 18, 1944.
Wounded Second Time. P.F.C. Owen J. Burke, of the infantry, was wounded the second time August 31 in southern France. This information was received recently by his mother, Mrs. Josephine Burke, of 740 Grand Street. P.F.C. Burke, who is 28, and a native of Jersey City, was first struck by enemy fire on March 13 in the Italian fighting. Since his last injury, he has finished a period of hospitalization and returned to active duty. He is a graduate of St. Patrick's School and was an employee of the Air Reduction Sales Co.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works could have had their copyright renewed between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st of the 29th year.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jersey Journal/1948/Miss Putz to Be Bride of V. G. Norton

* related portals: Vincent Gerard Norton.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Vincent Gerard Norton (1923-2005) and Florence Emily Putz (1925-1994) marriage in The Jersey Journal on October 8, 1948.
Miss Putz to Be Bride of V. G. Norton. The marriage of Miss Florence E. Putz, daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Frank J. Putz, 118 Stegman Street, to Mr. Vincent G. Norton, Garfield Avenue, will take place tomorrow at 11 in Sacred Heart Roman Catholic Church, Miss Kathryn Hanly will he maid of honor and Misses Beverly Clark and Margaret Kinlin will be bridesmaids. Mr. James Norton will be best man and the ushers will be Messrs. Robert Putz and Joseph Kinlin.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works could have had their copyright renewed between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st of the 29th year.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse