OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Rosemary and Pansies/A Jealous Lover

A JEALOUS LOVER
My dearest, do you really, truly love me,
Or do you but allow me to love you?
And can you, since you shine so far above me,
Remain, when time reveals my filings, true?
By jealousies and fears my soul's tormented,
I see a thousand rivals at your feet;
Most sure assurance leaves me discontented,
Some gall I find in every cup of sweet.
Oh! pardon me these doubts, misgivings, fancies,—
Who would not fear to lose a Koh-i-noor?
In you my heart, my soul, life's whole romance is,
Without you all my life's bare, bleak, and poor.
Yet if you love me not, ah! still deceive me,
And feign the tenderness you do not feel:
Despise me, scorn me, but ah! do not leave me;
Indifferent, strive indifference to conceal.
But oh how vain to ask you to dissemble!
Your white soul never could a falsehood stain;
Spite of yourself the very truth would tremble
On those sweet lips, howe'er they sought to feign.
Forgive me, dear! my doubts and fears I'll banish,
And wholly in your love and truth confide;
Here in your noble presence needs must vanish
All thoughts save those from evil purified.
1898
# Rosemary and Pansies/"Beauty and the Beast"

"BEAUTY AND THE BEAST"
AN IMPRESSION
(Alhambra, January 20, 1898)
# Smith v. Gale (137 U.S. 577)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
137 U.S. 577
Smith v. Gale
In computing the two years after the entry of a final
judgment, decree, or order sought to be reviewed in this court,
within which the writ of error must be brought or the appeal
taken, the day of the entry of such judgment, decree, or order
should be excluded. Credit Co. v. Arkansas Cent. Ry. Co., 128 U.
S. 258, 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 107. The motion to dismiss the appeal in
this cause is therefore denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Smith v. Gale (137 U.S. 577)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
137 U.S. 577
Smith v. Gale
Park Davis and A. G. Safford, for appellees.
[578] Enoch Totten, for appellant.
djQ FULLER, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Company/Dissent Bradley

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Bradley
United States Supreme Court
93 U.S. 486
Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Company
MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY, with whom concurred MR. JUSTICE MILLER and MR. JUSTICE FIELD, dissenting.
I dissent from the judgment of the court in this case, on the ground that the patentee, having duly made his application for a patent in 1855, and the same having been three times rejected, must be considered as having abandoned the same, inasmuch as no further effort was made to obtain a patent until either years afterwards, without any pretence that the patentee was engaged in perfecting his invention, and in the mean time the invention which he claims as his had come into general public use. The application for a patent made in 1864 was a new and independent application, and should be treated as such. As the public had enjoyed the use of the invention for more than two years prior to this application, the patent should be declared invalid Great injustice will, in my judgment, be done to the public to allow a patent obtained under such circumstances to stand. The public had a right to suppose that no further application would be made. The levy of a tribute now on all the dentists of the country who have brought the plate into public notice and use seems to me a species of injustice. The delay of the patentee, in fact, is made to operate to his benefit instead of his prejudice, his patent being made to run eight years longer than it would have done had it been granted when first applied for; so that the public is still further injured by sustaining the patent as finally granted. It is too common a case that associated companies, in order to maintain some valuable monopoly, look about to see what abandoned invention or rejected application, or ineffective patent, can be picked up, revamped, and carried through the Patent Office, and by the aid of ingenious experts and skilful counsel succeed in getting the desired protection. I think that the courts ought to be strict in maintaining the rights of the public in such cases. And the present case seems to me to be one in which we ought to hold the patent invalid as against those rights.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Smith v. Greenhow

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
109 U.S. 669
Smith v. Greenhow
Wm. L. Royall and Wager Swayne, for plaintiff in error.
F. S. Blair, for defendant, in error.
MATTHEWS, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Smith v. Gale

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Smith v. Gale."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Smith v. Gale (137 U.S. 577)
* Smith v. Gale (144 U.S. 509)
# Scientific Papers of Josiah Willard Gibbs, Volume 2/Chapter XIX

XIX.
FOURIER'S SERIES.
[Nature, vol. lix, p. 200, Dec. 29, 1898.]
I should like to add a few words concerning the subject of Prof. Michelson's letter in Nature of October 6. In the only reply which I have seen (Nature, October 13), the point of view of Prof. Michelson is hardly considered.
Let us write $f_{n}(x)$ for the sum of the first $n$ terms of the series
* $\sin x-{\tfrac {1}{2}}\sin {2x}+{\tfrac {1}{3}}\sin {3x}-{\tfrac {1}{4}}\sin {4x}+{\text{etc.}}$
* $y=2f_{n}(x).$
${\text{C}}_{n}.$
$n$
$\pi ,\pi$
$\pi ,-\pi$
$3\pi ,\pi$
$d$
$n'$
$n$
$n',$
${\text{C}}_{n}$
${\text{C}}_{n}$
$d$
But this limiting line is not the same as that expressed by the equation
* $y={\text{limit}}_{n=\infty }2f_{n}(x).$
$n$
${\text{C}}_{n}$
It should be observed that if we take the equation
* $y=2f_{n}(x),$
$n=\infty ,$
$y=0$
$x=\pi .$
$x=\pi ,$
$y=1,x=\pi ,$
$y=1,$
$x$
$y$
J. Willard Gibbs.
New Haven, Conn., November 29 [1898].
[Nature, vol. lix, p. 606, April 27, 1899.]
I should like to correct a careless error which I made (Nature, December 29, 1898) in describing the limiting form of the family of curves represented by the equation
| $y=2\left(\sin x-{\frac {1}{2}}\sin 2x...\pm {\frac {1}{n}}\sin nx\right)$ | (1) |
${\text{X,}}$
* $\int _{0}^{\pi }{\frac {\sin u}{u}}du.$
${\text{C,}}$
${\text{C}}_{n},$
$d$
$n$
$100\div d^{2},$
${\text{C}}_{n}$
${\text{C}}$
$d,$
${\text{C}}$
${\text{C}}_{n}$
$d.$
${\text{C}}$
${\text{C}}_{n}$
​I think this distinction important, for (with exception of what relates to my unfortunate blunder described above) whatever differences of opinion have been expressed on this subject seem due, for the most part, to the fact that some writers have had in mind the limit of the graphs, and others the graph of the limit of the sum. A misunderstanding on this point is a natural consequence of the usage which allows us to omit the word limit in certain connections, as when we speak of the sum of an infinite series. In terms thus abbreviated, either of the things which I have sought to distinguish may be called the graph of the sum of the infinite series.
J. Willard Gibbs.
New Haven, April 12 [1899].
# Scientific Philanthropy

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Scientific Philanthropy."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Scientific Philanthropy" by Lee J. Vance in Popular Science Monthly, 25 (August 1884)
* Fouillée, Alfred Jules Émile (1883) Scientific Philanthropy. Published in two parts, see:
** "Scientific Philanthropy I" by Alfred Jules Émile Fouillée in Popular Science Monthly, 22 (January 1883)
** "Scientific Philanthropy II" by Alfred Jules Émile Fouillée in Popular Science Monthly, 22 (February 1883)
# Scientific Sprague

This volume continues the history of the inter-mountain railway which played title rôle in the "Taming of Red Butte Western." Re-christened the Nevada Short Line, that indispensable and now thoroughly regenerate branch of the Pacific Southwestern might have enjoyed deserved prosperity had not its ancient enemy, the avid Transcontinental, marked it for its prey. [...] it is doubtful whether Sprague as a personality will strongly impress himself upon the popular mind. [...] The "appeal" of the tale lies neither in the mysteries of crime nor the ingenuities of the sleuth, but in an abundance of situations boldly designed to raise the reader's hair with apprehension. —extracted from the review in the Bookman, 1912 December.
Scientific Sprague
BY
FRANCIS LYNDE
ILLUSTRATED BY
B. ROSCOE SHRADER
CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS
Copyright, 1912, by CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS
Published October, 1912

### CONTENTS

CHAPTER
* The Wire Devil, 3
* High Finance in Cromarty Gulch, 57
* The Electrocution of Tunnel Number Three, 120
* The Mystery of thb Black Blight, 193
* The Cloud-Bursters, 253
* The High Kibosh, 328
ILLUSTRATIONS
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1930, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 93 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Scientific Papers of Josiah Willard Gibbs, Volume 2/Chapter XVII

XVII.
ON THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT AS DETERMINED BY FOUCAULT'S REVOLVING MIRROR.
[Nature, vol. xxxiii. p. 582, April 22, 1886.]
It has been shown by Lord Rayleigh and others that the velocity ($U$) with which a group of waves is propagated in any mediam may be calculated by the formula
* $U=V\left(1-{\frac {d\log V}{d\log \lambda }}\right),$
$V$
$\lambda$
* ${\frac {dV}{d\lambda }}\alpha ,$
$\alpha$
$dV/d\lambda$
$U$
$\lambda /(V-U)$
$d\lambda /dV$
$\alpha dV/d\lambda$
$\alpha$
​This consideration greatly simplifies the theory of Foucanlt's experiment, and makes it evident, I think, that the results of all such experiments depend upon the value of $U,$ and not upon that of $V.$
The discussion of the experiment by following a single wave, and taking account of its rotation, is a complicated process, and one in which it is very easy to leave out of account some of the elements of the problem. The principal objection to it, however, is its unreality. If the dispersion is considerable, no wave which leaves the revolving mirror will return to it. The individual disappears, only the group has permanence. Prof. Schuster, in his communication of March 11 (p. 439), has nevertheless obtained by this method, as the quantity determined by "the experiments hitherto performed," $V^{2}/(2V-U),$ which, as he observes, is nearly equal to $U.$ He would, I think, have obtained $U$ precisely, if for the angle between two successive wave-planes of similar phase, instead of $2\omega \lambda /V,$ he had used the more exact value $2\omega \lambda /U.$
By the kindness of Prof. Michelson, I am informed with respect to his recent experiments on the velocity of light in bisulphide of carbon that he would be inclined to place the maximum brilliancy of the light between the spectral lines ${\text{D}}$ and ${\text{E}},$ but nearer to ${\text{D}}.$ If we take the mean between ${\text{D}}$ and ${\text{E}},$ we have
* ${\frac {K}{U}}=1.745,$${\frac {K(2V-U)}{V^{2}}}=1.737,$
$K$
${\text{D}}.$
J. Willard Gibbs.
New Haven, Connecticut, April 1. [1886.]
# Satyagraha in South Africa

Satyagraha in South Africa
M. K. Gandhi
Translated from the Gujarati by Valji Govindji Desai
Navajivan Publishing House Ahmedabad 14
First Edition, 1928 Revised Second Edition, December 1950 Third Impression, August 1961, Fourteenth Thousand
Rupees Four
© The Navajivan Trust, 1928
Printed and Published by Jivanji Dahyabhai Desai at Navajivan Press, Ahmedabad 14
To Maganlal K. Gandhi
CONTENTS
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Shells from the Sands of Time/On the Gratitude we owe our Enemies

IT was a pithy saying that of Lorenzo de' Medici, and true as pithy, that we are enjoined to forgive our enemies, but nowhere are we told that we should forgive our friends. One thing is certain, that even our most inverterate and most influential enemies could prevail but little against us (so invariably does unscrupulous malice defeat itself), but for the treachery, collusion, cowardice, weakness, or imbecility of our nominal friends! Therefore we owe this debt of gratitude to our enemies (and it is not a small one), that they have been the means of our discovering the vipers that we have unconsciously been warming at our hearths, or worse still, it may be, in our bosoms, before they had the power of injuring us further. Appeal to any one's experience, and he will tell you that he has largely (that is, with so few exceptions as to establish the rule), proved the truth of Rochefoucault's maxim, "Faire un bienfait, faire un ingrat$^1$;" and yet, as in the vegetable and mineral kingdoms there grows an antidote near every poison, so in the moral world are there innumerable antidotes to this most deadly of all poisons, ingratitude, even in the immensity of unsuspected, gratuitous, unalloyed, and therefore almost sublime goodness, that exists up and down and round about the world. For seldom does any flagrant instance of baseness or ingratitude befall us, but the reaction of the blow strikes at other hearts that we ignored till then, and sets the unsealed fountains of their sympathy and sense of outraged justice gushing towards us in a thousand acts of kindness and devotion. For no tittle of God's word ever fails, and thus is His promise fulfilled, that if we cast our bread upon the waters, after many days it shall return to us. But to convince us of our own weakness and His strength, it generally does return to us at times and places where we could have least hoped for it, or rather where we most despaired of it. When the necessity is at the greatest and the spirit at the faintest, then comes the miraculous bread in the wilderness, WHICH, OUT OF HUMAN IMPOSSIBILITIES, NOT ONLY SUPPLIES OUR WANTS, BUT EXCEEDS THEM.
Shells from the Sands of Time

## Endnote

* Faire un bienfait, faire un ingrat: kindess begets ingratitude
# Shelton v. McKinley

The district court's decision in Shelton v. McKinley, 174 F. Supp. 351 (E.D. Ark. 1959), was reversed upon appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. See 364 U.S. 479 (1960).
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
174 F. Supp. 351
B. T. SHELTON et al. v. Ed. I. McKINLEY, Jr., et al.
No. Civ. 3708.—Decided: June 8, 1959.
* Court Documents
* Per Curiam Decision
* Linked cases: 231 Ark. 641 174 F. Supp. 351 364 U.S. 479
[p353] J. R. Booker, Christopher C. Mercer, Jr., Harold B. Anderson and Thad D. Williams, Little Rock, Ark., for plaintiffs.
Herschel H. Friday, of Mehaffy, Smith & Williams, Little Rock, Ark., and Louis L. Ramsay, Jr., of Coleman, Gantt & Ramsay, Pine Bluff, Ark., for defendants.
Before SANBORN, Circuit Judge, and MILLER and HENLEY, District Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Shelton v. King

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
229 U.S. 90
Shelton v. King
Argued: March 11 and 12, 1913. --- Decided: May 26, 1913
Messrs. Henry F. Woodard and Arthur A. Birney for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from page 91 intentionally omitted]
Mrs. Ellen S. Mussey and Mr. J. J. Darlington for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from page 92 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Lurton delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Shelton v. Platt

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
139 U.S. 591
Shelton v. Platt
G. W. Pickle and W. G. M. Thomas, for appellants.
W. W. MacFarland and Wm. Parkin, for appellee.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Shakespeare - First Folio facsimile (1910)/Measure, for Measure/Dramatis Personae

The Scene Vienna.
The names of all the Actors.
Vincentio: the Duke. Angelo, the Deputie. Escalus, an ancient Lord. Claudio, a yong Gentleman. Lucio, a fantastique. 2. Other like Gentlemen. Prouost. Thomas. } 2. Friers. Peter. Elbow, a simple Constable. Froth, a foolish Gentleman. Clowne. Abhorson, an Executioner. Barnardine, a dissolute prisoner. Isabella, sister to Claudio. Mariana, betrothed to Angelo. Iuliet, beloued of Claudio. Francisca, a Nun. Mistris Ouer-don, a Bawd.
FINIS.
Layout 2
# Shakespeare - First Folio facsimile (1910)/Much adoe about Nothing

* Act I
* Act II
* Act III
* Act IV
* Act V
# Shakespeare - First Folio facsimile (1910)/The Comedy of Errors

* Act I
* Act II
* Act III
* Act IV
* Act V
# Signs and Wonders God Wrought in the Ministry for Forty Years/Chapter 17

CHAPTER XVII
AT ANDERSON, IND. AND HANNIBAL, MO.
After attending the eldership at Indianapolis, we went to Anderson, Indiana, to attend the dedication of the new church, which was built by the church I organized there one year before. It is a large, comfortable house.
From Anderson we went to Urbana, Ill., to visit the Daniel’s Band. The Band met in Busly's hall, which was crowded, all the standing room being taken, and hundreds were turned away. There were a number of ministers present who took part, and spoke of the great work that had been done while we were there before, and still being done by the Band. Many testified that they had been healed four months and were still well. Some had better health than ever before. Three had been healed of cancer. We saw that the converts were strong men and women in the Lord.
We next went to Hannibal, Mo., and stopped at the Park hotel. We rented the rink, paying the rent ourselves. We had one of the hardest battles we ever fought. There was a band of false professors there. No one had confidence in them or their religion, They rushed into our meeting and tried to run away with it. We knew nothing about them, but I saw it was counterfeit. The people of the city saw them taking such an active part, and supposed we were just like them. This had the effect of keeping people away. I bore with them as long as I could, hoping that they would see that they were wrong, and would walk in the light. But none are so blind as those who will not see. I told them they must fall into line with us or fall out. They would not do either, but did everything that could be done to break up the meeting.
When the people saw that we did not approve of such work the interest increased till the largest building in the city was crowded and hundreds were turned away. The first convert was an old man, a saloon-keeper seventy years old. Many people followed, among whom were many of the best citizens. The long altar was filled day and night. Sometimes the altar was cleared in a few minutes, all converted or healed, and filled the second ​time, and sometimes the third. They were not only stricken down as dead in the meeting, but many miles away. One man was struck down in a trance at his home and lay in that condition for three days. Several doctors went to see him, but could not tell what was the matter with him. He came out praising God, and came to the meeting to tell his experience.
A woman asked the Lord to show her if we were teaching the doctrine of Christ. The Lord showed her in a vision. The plat- form we used for a pulpit, and the altar or mourners’ bench, that reached nearly across the rink, were pure white. She saw me and those who were with me clothed in pure white. On the platform she saw some earthen vessels, white as snow, and over all these was a soft cloud of glory, whiter than the driven snow. Over all the vessels she saw in shining letters: “These are my chosen vessels bearing the pure gospel of Christ in power.” Everything you see is pure white, the symbol of purity. She told the vision to the congregation.
CROWNING OF THE SAINTS
# Shakespeare - First Folio facsimile (1910)/The Second Part of King Henry the Fourth/Act 2 Scene 3

Scena Tertia.
Layout 2
# Shakespeare - First Folio facsimile (1910)/The Second Part of King Henry the Fourth/Act 3 Scene 1

Actus Tertius. Scena Prima.
Layout 2
# Shakespeare - First Folio facsimile (1910)/The Second Part of King Henry the Fourth/Act 4 Scene 1

Actus Quartus. Scena Prima.
Layout 2
# Shakespeare - First Folio facsimile (1910)/The Second Part of King Henry the Fourth/Act 5 Scene 3

Scena Tertia.
Layout 2
# Shakespeare - First Folio facsimile (1910)/The Second Part of King Henry the Fourth/Act 2 Scene 4

Scæna Quarta.
Layout 2
# Shakespeare - First Folio facsimile (1910)/The Second Part of King Henry the Fourth/Act 4 Scene 2

Scena Secunda.
Layout 2
# Shakespeare - First Folio facsimile (1910)/The Second Part of King Henry the Fourth/Act 5 Scene 1

Actus Quintus. Scœna Prima.
Layout 2
# Shakespeare - First Folio facsimile (1910)/The Second Part of King Henry the Fourth/Act 5 Scene 2

Scena Secunda.
Layout 2
# Shakespeare - First Folio facsimile (1910)/The Second Part of King Henry the Fourth/Act 2 Scene 2

Scena Secunda.
Layout 2
# Shakespeare - First Folio facsimile (1910)/The Second Part of King Henry the Fourth/Act 3 Scene 2

Scena Secunda.
Layout 2