OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Gila Bend Reservoir Irrigation Company v. Gila Water Company (202 U.S. 270)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
202 U.S. 270
Gila Bend Reservoir Irrigation Company v. Gila Water Company
Argued: and submitted April 12, 16, 1906. --- Decided: May 14, 1906
Messrs. William C. Prentiss and Joseph K. McCammon for appellant.
Mr. C. F. Ainsworth for appellee.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gila Bend Reservoir Irrigation Company v. Gila Water Company (205 U.S. 279)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
205 U.S. 279
Gila Bend Reservoir Irrigation Company v. Gila Water Company
Petition for rehearing filed January 7, 1907.
Decided April 8, 1907.
Messrs. Hugh T. Taggart and William C. Prentiss for appellant.
Mr. C. F. Ainsworth for appellee.
Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gila Bend Reservoir Irrigation Company v. Gila Water Company

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Gila Bend Reservoir Irrigation Company v. Gila Water Company."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Gila Bend Reservoir Irrigation Company v. Gila Water Company (202 U.S. 270)
* Gila Bend Reservoir Irrigation Company v. Gila Water Company (205 U.S. 279)
# Gila Valley, Globe, & Northern Railway Company v. Hall

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
232 U.S. 94
Gila Valley, Globe, & Northern Railway Company v. Hall
Argued: November 13, 1913. --- Decided: January 5, 1914
Mr. Eugene S. Ives for plaintiffs in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 95-97 intentionally omitted]
Mr. E. H. Thomas for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Pitney delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Stokes/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
296 U.S. 551
Helvering v. Stokes
Decree reversed. Douglas v. Willcuts, 296 U.S. 1, 56 S.Ct. 59, 80 L.Ed. 3, decided November 11, 1935.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Stokes

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
296 U.S. 551
Helvering v. Stokes
The Attorney General, for petitioner.
For opinion below, see Schweitzer v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C.C.A.) 75 F.(2d) 702.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Taylor

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
293 U.S. 507
Helvering v. Taylor
No. 289 Argued: Dec. 7, 1934. --- Decided: Jan 7, 1935
The Attorney General and Mr. Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for Petitioner.
Mr. Truman Henson, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Stuart

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
317 U.S. 154
Helvering v. Stuart
Argued: Oct. 22, 23, 1942. --- Decided: Nov 16, 1942
As Modified on Denial of Rehearing Dec. 14, 1942.
[Syllabus from pages 154-156 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Francis Biddle, Atty. Gen., and Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Messrs. Herbert Pope and George I. Haight, both of Chicago, Ill., for respondent R. Douglas Stuart.
Mr. Herbert Pope, of Chicago, Ill., for respondent John Stuart.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Tex-Penn Oil Company Same

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
300 U.S. 481
Helvering v. Tex-Penn Oil Company Same
Argued: Feb. 1, 2, 1937. --- Decided: March 29, 1937
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Thurman Arnold, of New Haven, Conn., for petitioner.
Mr. John W. Davis, of New York City, for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from page 482 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda Bank

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
293 U.S. 84
Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda Bank
No. 10 Argued: Oct. 10, 11, 1934. --- Decided: Nov 5, 1934
The Attorney General and Mr. Angus D. MacLean, Asst. Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Truman Henson, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# General Prologue (Chaucer)

part of The Canterbury Tales
* Prologue (1900) from The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer
* The Prologue from The Canterbury Tales and Faerie Queene (1870) (transcription project)
* The Prologue from The Canterbury tales of Geoffrey Chaucer (1914) (transcription project)
* General Prologue from (unsourced)
# General Railway Signal Company v. Virginia State Corporation Commission

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
246 U.S. 500
General Railway Signal Company v. Virginia State Corporation Commission
Argued: March 11, 1918. --- Decided: April 15, 1918
[Syllabus from page 500 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Hugh Satterlee and McGuire & Wood, all of Rochester, N. Y., for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Council on pages 501-508 intentionally omitted]
Mr. J. D. Hank, Jr., Atty. Gen., of Richmond, Va., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# General Product Safety Regulations

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "General Product Safety Regulations."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* General Product Safety Regulations 1994 (S.I. 1994/2328), an United Kingdom Statutory Instrument that implements the European Union's General Product Safety Directive of 92/59/EEC. Revoked by the General Product Safety Regulations 2005.
* General Product Safety Regulations 2005 (S.I. 2005/1803), an United Kingdom Statutory Instrument that implements the European Union's General Product Safety Directive of 2001/95/EC.
# General Report on Public Instruction in the Lower Provinces of the Bengal Presidency (1844-45)

​Page:General report on the public instruction in the lower provinces of the Bengal Presidency (1844-45).djvu/1
​Page:General report on the public instruction in the lower provinces of the Bengal Presidency (1844-45).djvu/5
​Page:General report on the public instruction in the lower provinces of the Bengal Presidency (1844-45).djvu/7 ​Page:General report on the public instruction in the lower provinces of the Bengal Presidency (1844-45).djvu/8 ​Page:General report on the public instruction in the lower provinces of the Bengal Presidency (1844-45).djvu/9
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# General Putnam

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This poem is about General Israel Putnam.
Printed in Putnam Phalanx. Excursion of the Putnam Phalanx to Boston, Charlestown and Providence, October 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th in the Year of Our Lord, 1859. Hartford: The Phalanx, 1859. Page 5.
GREAT Soul, and brave, 'tis good to think of thee,
And with a filial reverence raise the veil
From patriot valor, that ne'er sought of Fame
Her clarion-payment.
 See we not again,
The unfinished furrow, the forsaken home,
The flying steed, urg'd by thy sleepless heart
That throbb'd indignant o'er a smother'd found, The cry of Lexington?
 That echoed cry
Rous'd a young nation from its lingering sleep
To rush against the force of tyrant power,
Time-consecrated, and with fling and stone
Defy the giant.
 Bunker Hill records
Thy stern o'ermastery of the battle-storm,
The deep memorial of thy dauntless deeds
That bore the spirit of a trampled land,
Through this red preface of her liberty.
Hark!—from the heaving of yon burial sods
Where sleep our Country's champions, comes a
Demanding for thy name its just reward
Too long withheld.—Of History it demands
That lingering truth should light her lettered scroll,
And summons tardy man to set thy fame
In sculptured marble, that recording stars
May read it clearly from their silver thrones,
And lisping children from its tablet learn
What patriot virtue means.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# General Protective Committee for Holders of Option Warrants of United Corp. v. Securities & Exchange Commission

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
346 U.S. 521
General Protective Committee for Holders of Option Warrants of United Corp. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Argued: Dec. 2, 1953. --- Decided: Jan 4, 1954
See 347 U.S. 911, 74 S.Ct. 474.
Mr. John Mulford, Philadelphis, Pa., for petitioner.
Messrs. William H. Timbers, Richard Joyce Smith, New York City, Randolph Phillips, for respondents.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Grimaldi

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Grimaldi."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, taxonomy, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
In the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica:
* Giovanni Francesco Grimaldi, an architect and painter
* Joseph Grimaldi, a clown
# Grimes Dry-Goods Company v. Malcolm

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
164 U.S. 483
Grimes Dry-Goods Company v. Malcolm
G. B. Denison, for plaintiff in error.
Arthur G. Moseley, for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Grim Tales/end matter

UNIFORM WITH THIS VOLUME.
SPORT ROYAL.
By ANTHONY HOPE, AUTHOR OF "MR. WITT'S WIDOW." 1s.
TWO POPULAR 3s. 6d. NOVELS.
MR. WITT'S WIDOW. By Anthony Hope.
AMETHYST. By C. R. Coleridge.
NEW NOVELS IN PREPARATION.
WAYNFLETE. By C. R. Coleridge, author of "Amethyst." 2 vols. Crown 8vo, £1 1s.
THE VOICE OF A FLOWER. By Emily Gerard. 1 vol. Crown 8vo, 6s.
# Hampton v. Rouse (80 U.S. 187)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
80 U.S. 187
Hampton v. Rouse

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hampton v. Rouse

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Hampton v. Rouse."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Hampton v. Rouse (80 U.S. 187)
* Hampton v. Rouse (89 U.S. 263)
# Hampton v. Rouse (80 U.S. 187)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
80 U.S. 187
Hampton v. Rouse
THIS was a motion to dismiss a writ of error to the Circuit Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.
It appeared from the record that Wade Hampton, Wade Hampton, Jr., and J. M. Howell, were defendants in the court below to an action of ejectment, and that the bill of exceptions, on which the writ of error was sued out, was tendered by them jointly. The judgment was against the defendant in the singular, but, as the verdict was joint, this court considered it obvious that this was a mere clerical error, and that the judgment, doubtless, followed the verdict.
Wade Hampton alone prosecuted the writ of error, and there appeared to have been no summons and severance or other equivalent proceeding.
Mr. P. Phillips, in support of the motion; Mr. W. W. Boyce, contra.
It has often been held that in a writ of error to a joint judgment against several, all must join; and that the omission of one or more, without such proceeding, is an irregularity for which the writ will be dismissed. The motion in the present case must, therefore, be
GRANTED.

## Notes

* ↑ See Masterson v. Herndon, 10 Wallace, 416.
* ↑ Williams v. Bank of the United States, 11 Wheaton, 414; Owings v. Kincannon, 7 Peters, 399; The Protector, 11 Wallace, 82.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Grimm's Household Tales, Volume 2/Knoist and his Three Sons

Other versions: Knoist and his Three Sons
138.—KNOIST AND HIS THREE SONS.
Between Werrel and Soist there lived a man whose name was Knoist, and he had three sons. One was blind, the other lame, and the third stark-naked. Once on a time they went into a field, and there they saw a hare. The blind one shot it, the lame one caught it, the naked one put it in his pocket. Then they came to a mighty big lake, on which there were three boats, one sailed, one sank, the third had no bottom to it. They all three got into the one with no bottom to it. Then they came to a mighty big forest in which there was a mighty big tree; in the tree was a mighty big chapel—in the chapel was a sexton made of beech-wood and a box-wood parson, who dealt out holy-water with cudgels.
"How truly happy is that one  Who can from holy water run!"
# Grimm's Household Tales, Volume 2/Lean Lisa

168.—LEAN LISA.
Lean Lisa was of a very different way of thinking from lazy Harry and fat Trina, who never let anything disturb their peace. She scoured everything with ashes, from morning till evening, and burdened her husband, Long Laurence, with so much work that he had heavier weights to carry than an ass with three sacks. It was, however, all to no purpose, they had nothing and came to nothing. One night as she lay in bed, and could hardly move one limb for weariness, she still did not allow her thoughts to go to sleep. She thrust her elbows into her husband's side, and said, "Listen Lenz, to what I have been thinking: if I were to find one florin and one was given to me, I would borrow another to put to them, and thou too shouldst give me another, and then as soon as I had got the four florins together, I would buy a young cow." This pleased the husband right well. "It is true," said he, "that I do not know where I am to get the florin which thou wan test as a gift from me; but, if thou canst get the money together, and canst buy a cow with it, thou wilt do well to carry out thy project. I shall be glad," he added, "if the cow has a calf, and then I shall often get a drink of milk to refresh me." "The milk is not for thee," said the woman, "we must let the calf suck that it may become big and fat, and we may be able to sell it well." "Certainly," replied the man, "but still we will take a little milk; that will do no harm." "Who has taught thee to manage cows?" said the woman; "Whether it does harm or not, I will not allow it, and even if thou wert to stand on thy head for it, thou shouldst not have a drop of the milk! Dost thou think, because there is no satisfying thee, Long Laurence, that thou art to eat up what I earn with so much difficulty?" "Wife," said the man, "be quiet, or I will give thee a blow on thy mouth!" "What!" cried she, "thou threatenest me, thou glutton, thou rascal, thou lazy Harry!" She was just laying hold of his hair, but long Laurence got up, seized both Lean Lisa's withered arms in one hand, and with the other he pressed down her head ​into the pillow, let her scold, and held her until she fell asleep for very weariness. Whether she continued to wrangle when she awoke next morning, or whether she went out to look for the florin which she wanted to find, that I know not.
# Grimm's Household Tales, Volume 2/Odds and Ends

156.—ODDS AND ENDS.
There was once on a time a maiden who was pretty, but idle and negligent. When she had to spin she was so out of temper that if there was a little knot in the flax, she at once pulled out a whole heap of it, and strewed it about on the ground beside her. Now she had a servant who was industrious, and gathered together the bits of flax which were thrown away, cleaned them, span them fine, and had a beautiful gown made out of them for herself. A young man had wooed the lazy girl, and the wedding was to take place. On the eve of the wedding, the industrious one was dancing merrily about in her pretty dress, and the bride said,—
"Ah, how that girl does jump about, dressed in my odds and ends."
The bridegroom heard that, and asked the bride what she meant by it? Then she told him that the girl was wearing a dress make of the flax which she had thrown away. When the bridegroom heard that, and saw how idle she was, and how industrious the poor girl was, he gave her up and went to the other, and chose her as his wife.
# Henry IV Part 2 (1921) Yale/Appendix C

Layout 2
APPENDIX C
The Text of the Present Edition
The text of the present edition is, in the main, by permission of the Oxford University Press, that of the Oxford Shakespeare, edited by the late W. J. Craig. Stage directions, when not bracketed, are from either the First Quarto or the First Folio or both; bracketed stage directions are modern. The title of the play is from the First Quarto. The Dramatis Personæ are as given in the First Folio under the caption 'The Actors' Names.'
In II. ii. 131-149 the present editor has substituted the original assignment of speeches, in ll. 131, 135, as found in both Quarto and Folio, for Craig's assignment, as there seems to be no sufficient reason for emendations. He has also assigned ll. 139-148 to the Prince. Craig divides as follows:
131–133Poins. Sir John . . . certificate. 134 Prince. Peace. 135–149 Poins. I will . . . eat it.
Many minor departures from the Oxford text have been made in this edition in an attempt to arrive at a consistent text. The Oxford editor has in the majority of cases followed the readings of the First Quarto, but in about fifty instances he has adopted the slightly different expressions used in the more formal and less colloquial Folio text. For example, in the scenes of low comedy, he in the Folio is almost invariably a' in the Quarto; is it is is 't; it is is 'tis; etc. The Oxford editor has used sometimes the formal, sometimes the informal expression. He sometimes follows the Folio in correcting the grammar and the mispronunciations of Mistress Quickly and Justice Shallow, and sometimes does not; he ​frequently omits the oaths found in the Quarto and expurgated in the Folio, but more frequently includes them. The present editor has not thought it wise to burden his pages with a long list of the minor changes he has made in the Oxford text. His policy has been to follow, in general, the more colloquial Quarto text.
In the following list of other variants the readings of the present edition precede the colon, Craig's readings follow it, and the Quarto or Folio authority is given wherever involved:
Ind. 35 hole QF: hold
I. i. 33 comes QF: come
ii. 5 moe Q: more F
44 through QF: thorough
132 it QF: its
II. i. 2 action QF: exion
6 Sirrah!—: Sirrah, QF
82 all I have Q: all, all I have F
184 my lord Q: my good lord F
ii. 21 another Q: one other F
66 an QF: a
75 those QF: these
82 Poins QF: Bard.
123 kin QF: akin
137 he sure Q: sure he F
iii. 63 his QF: its
iv. 42 a pox damn you Q : omit F
51 Yea, joy Q: Ay, marry F
91 debuty Q: deputy F
93 Wedesday Q: Wednesday F
142 but I will Q: I will (passage omitted in F)
171 faitors (faters Q): fates F
194 fortune Q: fortuna F
298 shalt have Q: thou shalt have F
428-9 Come! (She comes blubbered.) Yea, will you come, Doll? Q: omit F
III. ii. 210 field QF: fields
339 invisible: invincible QF
IV. ii. 14 mischiefs QF: mischief
v. 146 inward, true, and Q: true and inward F
V. iii. 141 Blessed Q: Happy F
142 to Q: unto F
​iv. 2 that I might die Q : I might die F
11 wert Q: hadst F
v. 25 best, Q: most F
# Henry IV Part 2 (1921) Yale/Appendix D

Layout 2
APPENDIX D
Suggestions for Collateral Reading
A. C. Bradley: The Rejection of Falstaff in Oxford Lectures on Poetry. London, 1909.
George Brandes: William Shakespeare, a Critical Study. London, 1880.
Stopford Brooke: Ten More Plays of Shakespeare. London, 1913.
Beverley E. Warner: English History in Shakespeare's Plays. New York, 1894.
See also the corresponding appendix to Henry IV, Part I, in this edition.