OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Day/Dissent Stewart

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Black
* Dissenting Opinions Black Brennan Stewart
United States Supreme Court
360 U.S. 548
Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Day
Argued: March 26, 1959. --- Decided: June 29, 1959
Mr. Justice STEWART, dissenting.
My brother HARLAN'S opinion contains, it seems to me, a lucid and persuasive analysis of the principles that should guide decision in this troublesome area of law. Where I part company is in the application of these principles to the facts of the present case.
I cannot agree that the issuance by the petitioner of this press release was 'action in the line of duty.' The statement to the press (set out in note 5 of Mr. Justice HARLAN'S opinion) did not serve to further any agency function. Instead, it represented a personally motivated effort on the petitioner's part to disassociate himself from the alleged chicanery with which the agency had been charged.
By publicizing the action which he intended to take when he became permanent Acting Director, and his past attitude as a lesser functionary, the petitioner was seeking only to defend his own individual reputation. This was not within, but beyond 'the outer perimeter of petitioner's line of duty.'
For dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice BRENNAN, see 360 U.S. 564, 79 S.Ct. 1347.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Mitchell Coal & Coke Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
238 U.S. 251
Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Mitchell Coal & Coke Company
Argued: May 14, 1915. --- Decided: June 14, 1915
Messrs.
Francis I. Gowen, F. D. McKenney, and John G. Johnson for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Joseph Gilfillan and George S. Graham for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Van Devnter delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Old French Fairy Tales/Princess Rosette/Family Council

FAMILY COUNCIL
WHILE Rosette was only occupied with smiling and pleasant thoughts, the king, the queen and the princesses Orangine and Roussette were choking with rage. They had all assembled in the queen's apartment.
"This is too horrible," said the princesses. "Why did you send for this Rosette, who has such dazzling jewels and makes herself admired and sought after by all these foolish kings and princes? Was it to humiliate us, my father, that you called us to the court at this time?"
"I swear to you, my beautiful darlings," said the king, "that it was by the order of the fairy Puissante I was compelled to write for her to come. Besides, I did not know that she was so beautiful and that———"
"So beautiful!" interrupted the princesses. "Where do you find her so beautiful? She is indeed ugly and coarse. ​It is her magnificent attire alone which makes her admired. Why have you not given to us your most superb jewels and your richest robes? We have the air of young slovens by the side of this proud princess."
"And where could I possibly have found jewels as magnificent as hers? I have none which would compare with them. It is her godmother, the fairy Puissante, who has lent her these jewels."
"Why, then, did you summon a fairy to be the godmother of Rosette, when you gave to us only queens for our godmothers?"
"It was not your father who called her," cried the queen. "The fairy Puissante herself, without being called, appeared to us and signified that she would be Rosette's godmother."
"It is not worth while to spend the time in disputing and quarrelling," said the king. "It is better to occupy ourselves in finding some means of getting rid of Rosette and preventing Prince Charmant from seeing her again."
"Nothing more easy than that," said the queen. "I will have her despoiled to-morrow of her rare jewels and her beautiful robes. I will order my servants to seize her and carry her back to the farm which she shall never leave again."
The queen had scarcely uttered these words, when the fairy Puissante appeared with an angry and threatening air. "If you dare to touch Rosette," said she, with a thundering voice, "if you do not keep her at the palace, if she is not ​present at all the parties, you shall feel the terrible effects of my anger. You unworthy king and you heartless queen, you shall be changed into toads and you, odious daughters and sisters, shall become vipers. Dare now to touch Rosette!"
Saying these words, she disappeared.
The king, the queen and princesses were horribly frightened and separated without saying a single word but their hearts were filled with rage. The princesses slept but little and were yet more furious in the morning when they saw their eyes heavy and their features convulsed by evil passions. In vain they used rouge and powder and beat their maids. They had no longer a vestige of beauty. The king and queen were as unhappy and as despairing as the princesses and indeed they saw no remedy for their grief and disappointment.
# Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Company v. Long Island Loan & Trust Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
172 U.S. 493
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Company v. Long Island Loan & Trust Company
Charles E. Burr and Lawrence Maxwell, Jr., for plaintiff in error.
E. W. Kittredge and Joseph Wilby, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pittsburgh Gazette/Editorial on the Dred Scott case

published 7 March 1857
We do not know how other persons may feel in view of the recent dicta of the Supreme Court in the case of Dred Scott, an abstract of which was published in our telegraphic column on Saturday morning, but it appears to us that the almost diabolical spirit it evinces in going out of the way to Freedom at the expense of Slavery, ought to be sufficient to arouse to indignation the coolest and most torpid of northern men. The decision is a fitting crown to the aborted tyranny which has just submerged with Pierce; an iron clasp, well forged to link the dead with the living administration. It comes pat upon the recent inaugural, "rounds and caps it to the tyrant's eye" and just fills up the cup of inequity.
What matter is it that this decision upsets those we have on record? New lights have arisen with the progress of revolving years, and Story and Marshall, Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe hide their twinkling lights before the full-orbed glory of Douglas, Pierce and Davis. The Supreme Court has aimed a blow at State Sovereignty which is baser and more iniquitous than any thing we had before conceived of. The State of Illinois for example, under this decision in her legislative capacity, has no power to enact such a law as can make a slave coming there with the consent of his master a freeman! The decision that the Court has no jurisdiction in this case make all the other remarks from the bench touching the ordinance of 1787, and the compromise of 1820, mere obiter dicta, it is true, but the fact that the Court has gone out of its way to say what it has, shows its animus, and trumpets to the four corners of the earth the eager alacrity with which it echoes the mouthings of demagogues like Pierce and Douglas. We may henceforth throw to the winds the reasoning of Story and the decisions of Marshall, so far as this court is concerned, and submit to seeing the government surrendered, bound hand and foot to the same power which has given Kansas over to blood and desolation, elevated a weak old man to the executive chair, given the Treasury, the Post Office, the Army, the Navy and the Department of the Interior to be its willing servants and exhilarated and energized by its success, pressed on to the Supreme Court, made that the echo of its will and left no place for hope to rest upon, but the virtue of the masses of the people, to which we must henceforth appeal. Let them come in their might and at the ballot box root up the rotten fabric to its foundations which four years of misrule has served so much to weaken, and which the four years to come will doubtless not improve or strengthen.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corporation/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Marshall
United States Supreme Court
400 U.S. 542
Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corporation
Argued: Dec. 9, 1970. --- Decided: Jan 25, 1971
Petitioner Mrs. Ida Phillips commenced an action in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 alleging that she had been denied employment because of her sex. The District Court granted summary judgment for Martin Marietta Corp. (Martin) on the basis of the following showing: (1) in 1966 Martin informed Mrs. Phillips that it was not accepting job applications from women with pre-school-age children; (2) as of the time of the motion for summary judgment, Martin employed men with pre-school-age children; (3) at the time Mrs. Phillips applied, 70-75% of the applicants for the position she sought were women; 75-80% of those hired for the position, assembly trainee, were women, hence no question of bias against women as such was presented.
The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed, 411 F.2d 1, and denied a rehearing en banc, 416 F.2d 1257 (1969). We granted certiorari. 397 U.S. 960, 90 S.Ct. 994, 25 L.Ed.2d 252 (1970).
Section 703(a) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires that persons of like qualifications be given employment opportunities irrespective of their sex. The Court of Appeals therefore erred in reading this section as permitting one hiring policy for women and another for men-each having pre-school-age children. The existence of such conflicting family obligations, if demonstrably more relevant to job performance for a woman than for a man, could arguably be a basis for distinction under § 703(e) of the Act. But that is a matter of evidence tending to show that the condition in question 'is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business or enterprise.' The record before us, however, is not adequate for resolution of these important issues. See Kennedy v. Silas Mason Co., 334 U.S. 249, 256-257, 68 S.Ct. 1031, 1034, 92 L.Ed. 1347 (1948). Summary judgment was therefore improper and we remand for fuller development of the record and for further consideration.
Vacated and remanded.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corporation

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Marshall
United States Supreme Court
400 U.S. 542
Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corporation
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
No. 73. Argued: December 9, 1970 --- Decided: January 25, 1971
Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, an employer may not, in the absence of business necessity, refuse to hire women with pre-school-age children while hiring men with such children.
411 F. 2d 1, vacated and remanded.
William L. Robinson argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Norman C. Amaker, and Earl M. Johnson.
Donald T. Senterfitt argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were William Y. Akerman, Paul A. Porter, Victor H. Kramer, Dennis G. Lyons, James A. Dobkin, Clark C. Vogel, James T. Ellison, J. Thomas Cardwell, and George T. Edison, Jr.
Lawrence G. Wallace argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Leonard, Robert T. Moore, and Stanley P. Hebert.
Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed by Dorothy Kenyan, Norman Dorsen, Pauli Murray, and Melvin L. Wulf for the American Civil Liberties Union; by Gilbert Feldman for the Air Line Stewards and Stewardesses Association, Local 550, Transport Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO; by Jacob D. Hyman, Faith A. Seidenberg, Marguerite Rawalt, and Phineas Indritz for NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc.; and by Sylvia Ellison for Human Rights for Women, Inc.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Phillips v. Moore

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
100 U.S. 208
Phillips v. Moore
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Texas.
This was an action by Moore against Phillips and Hancock to recover possession of a tract of land in Texas. There was a finding and judgment against the defendants, who thereupon sued out this writ of error.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Submitted on printed arguments by Mr. W. P. Ballinger for the plaintiffs in error, and by Mr. D. D. Atchison for the defendant in error.
MR. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# On the Coromandel Coast/front matter

ON THE COROMANDEL COAST
WORKS BY THE SAME AUTHOR.
HISTORY OF FORT ST. GEORGE, MADRAS.
THE NAUTCH GIRL.
THE FOREST OFFICER.
A MIXED MARRIAGE.
THE SANYÂSI.
DILYS.
CASTE AND CREED.
THE TEA PLANTER.
THE INEVITABLE LAW.
# On the Death of Anne Brontë

There's little joy in life for me, And little terror in the grave; I've lived the parting hour to see Of one I would have died to save.
Calmly to watch the failing breath, Wishing each sigh might be the last; Longing to see the shade of death O'er those beloved features cast.
The cloud, the stillness that must part The darling of my life from me; And then to thank God from my heart, To thank Him well and fervently;
Although I knew that we had lost The hope and glory of our life; And now, benighted, tempest-tossed, Must bear alone the weary strife.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# On the Death of Joseph Rodman Drake

See also Joseph Rodman Drake
Green be the turf above thee,  Friend of my better days! None knew thee but to love thee,  Nor named thee but to praise.
Tears fell when thou wert dying,  From eyes unused to weep, And long, where thou art lying,  Will tears the cold turf steep.
When hearts, whose truth was proven,  Like thine, are laid in earth, There should a wreath be woven  To tell the world their worth;
And I who woke each morrow  To clasp thy hand in mine, Who shared thy joy and sorrow,  Whose weal and woe were thine;
It should be mine to braid it  Around thy faded brow, But I've in vain essayed it,  And feel I cannot now.
While memory bids me weep thee,  Nor thoughts nor words are free,-- The grief is fixed too deeply  That mourns a man like thee.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# On the Countess Dowager of Pembroke

* related authors: Mary Sidney.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Epitaph, published 1660, composed in tribute to Mary, Countess of Pembroke, after her death in 1621. The poem has in the past been ascribed to Ben Jonson due to being of higher caliber than much of Browne's other work.
* "On the Countess Dowager of Pembroke" in Pastoral Poems by Nicholas Breton, Selected Poetry by George Wither, and Pastoral Poetry by William Browne (1906)
* "On the Countess Dowager of Pembroke" in the Oxford Book of English Verse 1250-1900 (ed.) by Arthur Quiller-Couch (1931).
* "On the Countess Dowager of Pembroke" in the Oxford Book of English Verse 1250-1918 (ed.) by Arthur Quiller-Couch (1940)
# Poems (Blake)/The Master's Hand

POEMS.
# Poems (Blake)/The Last Bulletin

FOR SPECIAL OCCASIONS.
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 11/Mary Canavan

​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/738 ​Page:Once a Week Jun to Dec 1864.pdf/739
# Patriotic pieces from the Great War/The Cost

THE COST
Permission of Everybody's Magazine, New York
Six o'clock when the homeward traffic of a city is heaviest from shops and offices. The street was crowded with people who, in their rush, bumped heedlessly against each other. Some smiled. Some went with fixed faces like masks. Motor-horns and car-bells blared and clanged in a medley of impatient sound. Through it all I wove my way—a little shuttle trailing my one frail thread through the pattern of the whole.
Then I heard him bawling of the wares he sold.
"Here you are!" he cried, his mouth incredibly big and twisted. "Here you are! Buy the American colors! Red! White! Blue! The colors that never run! Be a patriot! Buy your little Service-pin! Here you are!"
I stopped before him.
"How much are the Service-pins?" I asked.
"How many stars do you want on it?" said he, plunging his hand into the bag of them strung round his neck with a strap.
"Three," I told him proudly.
He held out the pin to me—a white square rimmed with red, three blue stars on its field; ​each star for one man of my blood who risks his life for America.
"It costs fifteen cents," said he; "a nickel a star."
Through a sort of haze I stared at him. "Fifteen cents!" he had said. "A nickel a star."
And suddenly I seemed to see the oldest of the three: a desk-bound man with straight and pleasant lips and the comfortable ways of one who is happy among simple things. There had been no yearning for adventure, no restlessness. Yet how quickly he had gone just the same. Like a child, who hears a loved one calling him, he had closed his books and risen to answer—at once. One long look into steady eyes very like his own. Only one question: "You want me to go. Mother?" And the cry in answer: "My boy!"
And the other one—the second; he who is so gentle that babies nod wisely at him, as though there were some secret between them. I remember the winter's night he brought the stray kitten home and fed it with warm milk, drop by drop. Already his comrades in the Signal Corps complain because his horse follows him inside their tent. A man so generous that his touch holds a kind of healing. Yet he too has gone—to kill! Gone with the ​warmth of his heart blazing white hot from his eyes. When last I saw him, it seemed to me he was an arrow strung back on the bow to the head. The change in him!
Then the last to go—the youngest, the tallest, the straightest; his brows a little knit—puzzled—not wholly understanding this thing that told him to put his boyhood behind him and become, too soon, a man. Still, eager, frightened, and very brave—he went.
These stars of mine "A nickel a piece; The three of them for fifteen cents!" I thought I laughed. But maybe not, for through the dusk the vender peered at me strangely. Then—
"Can't pay?" he asked. "Too much?"
I fastened my Service-pin to my breast.
"No," I said. "I can pay. It costs a lot, but—not too much."
—Ethel Lloyd Patterson
# Patriotic pieces from the Great War/The Drums

THE DRUMS
Permission of the Evening Bulletin, Philadelphia
Ere we wonder at his absence, let us tell a little truth Of the healthy, careless fellow who epitomizes Youth. We will miss him from the gridiron when the foot ball season comes For he left his spirit moving to the music of the drums; For he knows that all the knowledge He can make his own at college Will not compensate him wholly for the absence of the drums; For the rat-tat-tat of drums! You will miss him from the diamond, the links and tennis court, Miss the sport. He's been summoned by the drums! By the thrilling call of bugles, by the echoing report Of a cannon fired by Rumor where grim Death is doing sums; Doing sums with grim precision— Hell's subtraction and division— With an abacus of drums; Not the tiny kettle drums; Not the snare, or tenor drums; ​But the drum fire of the cannon that perpetually strums With insistent shot and shell On the tympanum of Hell. But there's music in the drums! There is magic in the drums! There is music, there is magic, There is fascination tragic In the drums!
For the drums are telling patriots of wrongs that must be righted; The drums are droning dirges of the lives the Hun has blighted; Of the blood that he has spilled; Of the babies he has killed; Of the retribution awful that a righteous Lord has willed. "Boy, we need you!" Cry the drums. "Though we bleed you," Cry the drums. "Free the world as we have freed you!" Cry the drums. "Boy, you're wanted!" Cry the drums! And, undaunted Here he comes!
​Hail Columbia's sons are marching! Rich and poor alike are chums! They've been welded fast together by the magic of the drums! By the drums! By the rat-tat-tat Of drums! By the fiat flat Of drums! By the glory that's surrounding Every deed of dogged pounding! Of the roll of honor sounding! Of the drums!
—Grif Alexander
# Patriotic pieces from the Great War/Squaring Ourselves

SQUARING OURSELVES
How many howled about Josephus every time a sailor man Found an unresponsive barkeep when he went to rush the can! How they growled about Josephus when commanders got the news That the Admiral had orders for a dry and boozeless cruise! Even such a wild teetotaller as the temperate T. R. Shouted from a thousand housetops that Josephus went too far. From all quarters of the Nation excellent, well-meaning folk, Said in letters to the papers that Josephus was a joke.
Poets chuckled (we among them) in all sorts of jibing verse When Josephus said that seamen might be brave, and still not curse. Never on the rolling ocean had men navigated ships Be the weather fine or dirty, without oaths upon their lips. Even Dr. Lyman Abbott had to pause and breathe a prayer ​For a man who said that sailors had not simply got to swear! And there swept across the Nation, North and South and East and West The unanimous conclusion that Josephus was a jest.
But when Congress started peering into things that had to do With the arming of the warship and the comfort of the crew, When grave statesmen asked him questions as to this and as to that It was noticed that Josephus answered right straight off the bat. For his drinkless, curseless navy—every unit—thanks to him, From the dreadnoughts to the cutters, is in first-class fighting trim. Now at last the pitying jesters (we among them) see a light, For the fact has dawned upon us that Josephus is all right!
—James Montague