OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Rockefeller v. Orans/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
382 U.S. 10
Rockefeller v. Orans
On April 14, 1965, the New York Court of Appeals ruled that the New York Laws of 1964, cc. 976, 977, 978, 979, 981, were invalid under the New York Constitution, Art. III, § 2. On July 13, 1965, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York enjoined interference with an election of members of the New York Legislature to be held on November 2, 1965, based on 'the scheme set forth' in the New York Laws of 1964, c. 976. Insofar as the decision of the Court of Appeals has been superseded by the order of the District Court, the appeal is dismissed. In all other respects, the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
[For concurring opinion of Mr. Justice HARLAN, see WMCA, Inc., et al. v. Lomenzo, 86 S.Ct. 24.]

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rockefeller v. Wells

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 421
Rockefeller v. Wells
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and George D. Zuckerman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellants.
Isidore Levine, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc.

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
397 U.S. 820
Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and George D. Zuckerman and Lloyd G. Milliken, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants.
James M. Hartman and Richard L. Epstein, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc./Concurrence Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Douglas
United States Supreme Court
397 U.S. 820
Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS concurs in the result.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc./Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Douglas
United States Supreme Court
397 U.S. 820
Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc.
The judgment appealed from does not include an order granting or denying an interlocutory or permanent injunction and is therefore not appealable to this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1253. See Goldstein v. Cox, 396 U.S. 471, 90 S.Ct. 671, 24 L.Ed.2d 663. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded to that court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which timely appeal may be taken to the Court of Appeals. See Stamler v. Willis, 393 U.S. 407, 89 S.Ct. 677, 21 L.Ed.2d 627.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Selected letters of Mendelssohn/Letter 17

TO HIS MOTHER.
Düsseldorf, 4th November, 1834.
Dear Mother,—At last I have a chance of thanking you for your dear letter. You know how much your lines rejoice me, and I hope you do not find writing troublesome, for your hand is as small and clear and classical at the end as at the beginning, and as it always was; so I beg you, let me have the joy of seeing it often; you know how grateful I am. You take me home so completely; I am there while I read your letter, enjoying the summer in our garden, visit the exhibition, tease Ganz about his satisfaction at an invitation from Metternich, and almost renew my flirtations with the fair Russian ladies. These flittings home are better than ever these last weeks, during which I have been absorbed in thunderings and disputations about Düsseldorf, art, the rising glory of the Rhineland, and other new marvels. This place has brought me into a fearful state of heat and confusion, and things go harder than in my busiest time in London. When I set to work in the morning there comes a pull at the bell at every bar; a procession of singers with grievances to assail me, or incompetent singers whom I have to instruct, or else they are ​shabby players whom I have to engage; and when that has gone on all day, and I say to myself, it is all for the Düsseldorf theatre and its salvation, my temper becomes terribly bad. At the day before yesterday I made up my mind, shook myself free of the whole business, and now I am a man again. It was, indeed, a difficult matter to inform our theatrical autocrat, alias stage-mufti, of this resolution. He bit his lip at me as if he was going to devour me whole, but I delivered him a short, impressive speech, and informed him that my own work concerned me more than the future of the Düsseldorf theatre, so in spite of the utmost desire, etc. etc. In short, they let me go under the sole condition that I should, from time to time, act as conductor, and this I promised and will observe. •••••• With “St. Paul” I have now reached a point at which I should like to play it to someone, only I can’t find the right person. My friends here are quite delighted with it, but that does not prove very much. I miss the cantor with her thick eyebrows and her critical sense. I have almost got the second part into shape in my mind up to the place where they imagine St. Paul to be Jupiter, and want to sacrifice to him; several great choruses will have to come in here, but I have no notion of them yet—it is hard. You ask if I have made any arrangements for publishing at Leipsic. Breitkopf and Hartel, however, give me to understand ​they are ready to publish everything, and this for the sake of a future issue of my collected works (doesn’t that sound vastly imposing?). They say they feel much injured at the production of anything of mine by another publisher. The good people shall be saved such troubles in future. But apart from them I have had letters from six musical publishers in different places asking for things to bring out. This sounds rather like vain-glory, but I know you will be glad to hear it, and will excuse me.
# Selected letters of Mendelssohn/Letter 18

TO SECRETARY HIRTE AT COLOGNE.
Düsseldorf, 18th May, 1835.
Honored Sir,—Accept my thanks for your friendly lines which have given me great pleasure. The idea which you communicate in them does me honour, but I must admit that I have a certain shyness about it, which I have been unable to get rid of for a considerable time. It is now so much the vogue for unknown or ordinary people to have their likenesses published so as to become a little better known, or else they do it to get a reputation without earning one, that I have always hesitated to do this too early myself. I should like to avoid it till I had accomplished something which I could be persuaded really deserved this honour. That is, however, not the case at present, and I should be happy to see such a recognition postponed till, in my own conviction, I am worthier of it. But I owe you many thanks for the friendship and kindness which prompted your proposal.I am, etc., etc.,
Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy.
# Selected letters of Mendelssohn/Letter 13

TO HIS FAMILY.
London, 11th May, 1832.
I must just describe to you one very delightful morning last week. It was the pleasantest and most touching instance of public recognition that has ever yet happened to me, and I perpetually recur to it with satisfaction. On Saturday morning there was a rehearsal at the Philharmonic, at which, however, nothing of my own was performed, for my overture was not yet completed. I was in a box during Beethoven’s Pastoral Symphony and then went down to the floor of the hall to speak to some old acquaintances. Just as I got down, some one in the orchestra exclaimed: “There is Mendelssohn!” and on that they all began to shout and clap with such vehemence that for a time I was at a loss what to do; then as they were leaving off, some one else cried out: “Welcome to him!” and then the uproar began over again, and I was obliged to make my way down the hall and climb up into the orchestra, whence I conveyed my thanks to them. I shall never forget it, for that pleased me more than any distinction. It shows that the musical people like me, and are glad of my coming; altogether, it was a greater joy than I can tell you.
Felix.
# Selected letters of Mendelssohn/Letter 14

TO PASTOR JULIUS SCHUBRING, DESSAU.
Coblentz, 6th September, 1833.
Dear Schubring,—Your letter with the enclosed contribution came to hand while I was beginning to arrange the sheets of my oratorio, and thinking much at the same time of the music I am going to write next winter. It struck me so much that I have copied out the whole text, as far as it has got, and now send it, hoping that you will do what you did before, and give me the benefit of all your comments and suggestions. You will see in the margin some notes of things that are still wanting, and of places which I want to fill with passages from the Bible and hymn book. But what I chiefly want is your opinion (1) about the form of the whole work, particularly of the narrative parts. Do you think it can be left as it is, with the narrative and the dramatic elements side by side? I can’t venture on Bach’s method of personified narrative, and this combination strikes me as the most natural thing, and only laborious at certain places, as the “Ananias,” where the lengthy inter-connected recitals make it so.
​(2) Do you think there are any leading features of the story, or of the character and teaching of Paul, either omitted or set in a false light?
(3) Where would you make the divisions of the first and second parts?
(4) Do you think I could bring in the chorale. Some people have objected to it very strongly, and yet I cannot bring myself to give it up altogether, for it seems to me it must have a natural place in every oratorio taken from the New Testament. If you agree to this, please let me hear what chorales you would put in, and where. You see I ask a great deal, but then I shall have to work hard enough when I begin the music, and, besides, I know you take an interest in the matter.
If you can oblige me in all this, just send a few words to Berlin, where I must be for two or three days after to-morrow; it is to take care of my father, who was with me in England, and became seriously ill there. He is well again now, thank God! but I have had so much anxiety all this time that I want to do everything possible till I can feel he is safe at home. Then off again, and back to Düsseldorf. You know that I was director of the musical festival there, and have opportunely got settled there for two or three years to manage the church music and the singing association, and probably a new theatre that is to be founded there as well; my private reason, however, is to get an opportunity of composing in peace and for myself. I find the country and the people charming, and the “St. Paul” is to be brought ​out in the winter. I also had my new symphony produced in England, and people were pleased with it. It will be printed after “The Hebrides,” which is now in hand. That is all very good, but I am thinking one’s real work should come first, and so I hope it will turn out. It is very wrong of me to write you a dull, impersonal, and entirely serious letter like this, but things have gone that way with me lately, and so I am becoming more serious myself,—Yours,
Felix M. B.
# Selected letters of Mendelssohn/Letter 15

TO J. MOSCHELES IN LONDON.
Düsseldorf, 7th February, 1834.
——My special weakness in new passages for the piano has again struck me forcibly in the “rondo brillant” which I want to adapt to your style. It is at these points that I always stick fast and get in distress; I fear you cannot but remark it. Otherwise, there is much in it that I like, and certain passages please me decidedly, but how I am to set about composing something quiet and uneccentric (I remember well that was your advice last spring), is more than I can tell. All that I have in my head for the piano is about as quiet as Cheapside, and when I sit down quite calmly to improvise, that sort of thing always comes gradually in again. On the other hand, the piece which I am now writing for the Philharmonic I am afraid will be far too tame. However, I must not criticise myself so much. I am hard at work, which is as good as saying that I am well and contented.
But when you, my dear Madame Moscheles, order me to take no account of public or critics, I must beg to state that my business is to write music in despite of the public, and in despite of the critics as well. ​What’s Hecuba to me, or criticism besides, the printed sort I mean? So if an overture to “Lord Eldon” in the form of a reversible canon should happen to occur to me, or a double fugue with a canto fermo, I will write them, though they would be sure to be unpopular. Still more a beautiful Melusine, though that is another matter. It would be horrible if one could never get a chance of having one’s things performed; still, as you think that there is no reason to fear it, I say long live the public and the critics, only I mean to live myself, and, if possible, come to England next year……
# Scientific American/Series 1/Volume 1/Issue 1/Attraction

Attraction
Attraction is a curious power,  That none can understand: Its influence is every where—  In water, air and land; It keeps the earth compact and tight,  As though strong bolts were through it; And, what is more mysterious yet,  It binds us mortals to it.
You throw a stone up in the air,  And down it comes—ker-whack! The centrifugal casts it up—  The centripetal—back. My eyes! I can't discover how  One object 'tracts another; Unless they love each other, like  A sister and a brother.
I know the compass always points  Directly at the pole; Some say the north star causes this,  And some say—Symm's Hole! Prehaps it does—prehaps it don't;  Prehaps some other cause; Keep on prehapsing—who can solve  Attraction's hidden laws?
A fly lights on a 'lasses cup—  Attraction bids him woo it; And, when he's in, attraction keeps  The chap from paddling through it. Attraction lures the sot to drink,  To all his troubles drown; But when his legs give way, he falls,  And "traction keeps him down.
Attraction is a curious power,  That none can understand; Its influence is everywhere—  In water, air and land. It operates on every thing—  The sea, the tides, the weather; And sometimes draws the sexes up,  And binds them fast together.
# Scientific American/Series 1/Volume 1/Issue 1/Every Subscriber an Agent

EVERY SUBSCRIBER AN AGENT.--We have often observed in sectarian papers, a general request that all clergymen of the same denomination, should act as agents for the paper; and by such means, some papers have attained to an immense circulation. Not having any similar available advantage, we would solicit the favour of every honest mechanic who may receive this paper, to use his influence in our favour, and induce as many more as possible to subscribe for it. All favours of this kind will be duly appreciated.
# Scientific American/Series 1/Volume 1/Issue 1/Cause of Sound in Thunder

​Cause of Sound in Thunder.—Thunder is one of the consequences resulting from lightning, and lightning appears to be occasioned by the combustion of some of the inflammable particles of air; or according to more recent opinions, of a condensation of aerial matter conducing to electricity, by which in either case, a vacuum is created. The surrounding atoms which remain uninfluenced by this change, being forced together, by the whole weight of the atmosphere, greatly constrict each other; but their elastic nature causes them immediately to expand, and by this enlargement their sonorous property is acquired. A centrifugal force being thus established, it acts in all directions alike; but as the circle extends, its propulsive power becomes gradually diminished, till at last its pressure is no longer felt, nor sound created. The fumbling noise of thunder is produced by that portion of the sonorous circle which strikes upon the earth, whence it becomes condensed; and, being intercepted in its upward course by dense masses of vapor, it is again reflected, and this alternate motion and reverberation continue, until the interruption ceases, or the original force is exhausted. Echo is occasioned also by reverbration from one cloud to another.—Webster's Principles of Sound.
# Scientific American/Series 1/Volume 1/Issue 1/A Sensible Horse

​A Sensible Horse.—One of the truck horses of Mr. Hinds was unloosed for a minute or two from the trucks, a few days since, in this city, when, he the driver looking around for him, behold he was missing. It was an hour or two, before the driver could discover his whereabout. It was very mysterious, he being a steady beast, and not subject to flights of fancy. However, he was at last found in the smith's shop, where he was wont to have his shoes repaired. The smith said the horse entered and took the usual stand for shoeing. Upon examining his feet he found one shoe off, which he supplied. That horse is a sensible beast.
# Scientific American/Series 1/Volume 1/Issue 1/A Specimen of Vegetable Silk

​A Specimen of Vegetable Silk, raised from seeds received from Italy, which came originally from Syria, has been presented to the National Institute. Some of the seeds have been forwarded to Florida to the Hon. D. Levy, for the purpose of being cultivated.
# Scientific American/Series 1/Volume 1/Issue 1/Burning Well

​Burning Well.—A correspondent of the Cleveland Plain Dealer, gives an account of a burning well that may be seen at Southington Centre, in Trumbull county, Ohio. The well is 91 feet deep, all but 24 feet through sand-stone, quick sand and hard rock, which the augur used for boring could not penetrate. When it was withdrawn, a peculiar odor accompanied by a rushing sound, was perceived. Suspecting the presence of inflammable gas, Mr. Wannemaker, the owner of the well, lowered a lamp into it. A violent explosion, that did some injury to the by-standers, was the consequence, and the gas still continues to burn. It is doubtless carburetted hydrogen.
# Scientific American/Series 1/Volume 1/Issue 1/Extraordinary Phenomenon

​Extraordinary Phenomenon.—The inhabitants of the village of Moulton were greatly astonished on Saturday last, at observing a considerable quantity of hay (from a field where it was in cocks for stacking) rise rapidly into the air. There was not the slightest breeze of wind perceptible at the time; however the hay continued to ascend until it apparently passed through the clouds, which were sailing high at the time. After the lapse of a few minutes it again appeared like a small black streak in the cloudy vapour, where it continued to form a most novel and extraordinary sight for ten or fifteen minutes, when it gradually descended again to the earth.—Linconsure Chronicle.
# Scientific American/Series 1/Volume 1/Issue 1/A Smoke Filter for Locomotives

​A Smoke Filter for Locomotives.—An invention, which promises to be one of great utility, has been recently made by Mr. J. P. Dempfil, a French gentleman, of much scientific talent.—The invention consists of "an attachment" to the chimney of a locomotive, dividing it by a partition in two parts or passages, upward and downward, with a flywheel at the bottom of the downward draft, and a layer of gravel or sand underneath the wheel. The top of the chimney is closed, and the smoke and cinders pass upward through one passage to the top, then descending through the other, (a strong draught being made by the revolution of the flywheel, which is put in motion by the steam,) and all the refuse of the smoke pipe is retained by the grand filter, and the heated air again passes into the furnaces.
# Scientific American/Series 1/Volume 1/Issue 1/Editors and Publishers

Editors and Publishers.
We shall send copies of our first number to several of our most respected cotemporaries, and would solicit their aid in notifying the mechanics of their vicinities, of the existence of the S. American. Those who will give our advertisement (head of our first page,) an insertion in their columns, shall be entitled to two copies of our paper, by which they will each have one copy to preserve and another to clip, as occasion may require; or, if they prefer it, we will send a dollar in cash for the insertion. Those who may volunteer to act as agents for this paper, may retain of the money received, 25 cents as commission, for each subscriber obtained.
# Rosemary and Pansies/A Poet's Grievance

A POET'S GRIEVANCE
# Rosemary and Pansies/A Prayer for Light

A PRAYER FOR LIGHT
# Rosemary and Pansies

The copy of this book used for this transcription includes an autograph dedication to 'J. C. L. Clark' from the author. Part of this dedication is a short poem called 'The Test of Love.' Although it is not part of the original work, it has been included in the transcription.
ROSEMARY AND PANSIES
ROSEMARY AND PANSIES
BY
BERTRAM DOBELL.
LONDON PUBLISHED BY THE AUTHOR 77 CHARING CROSS ROAD, W.C MDCCCCIV
TO
ARTHUR H. BULLEN
CONTENTS
SONNETS
[Note.—Early in 1901 I printed, for private circulation, an edition of seventy-five copies only of a volume of poems with the same title as that of the present book. Many of the poems which were printed in that volume are included in this; but a few which appeared there have not been reprinted. On the other hand, the present volume contains a good many pieces which were not included in the issue of 1901. These new poems are distinguished in the above list by having a * prefixed to them.]
Printed by Ballantyne, Hanson & Co. London & Edinburgh
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rosemary and Pansies/A Poet's Optimism

A POET'S OPTIMISM
# Rosemary

published in: The New England Magazine / Volume 23, Issue 3. November 1897.
THERE was a long path through the fern,—  O Rosemary, dost thou not know? A silver maple at the turn,  A little gate below. There was a youth, there was a maid, She in the light, he in the shade, When all the world was fair to see,—  O Rosemary, O Rosemary!
There was a briar by the wall,—  O Rosemary, hast thou forgot? A slender, tender hand and small,  Stained with a crimson spot. There was a little cry of pain, Two heads bent low, then raised again; And all the sun seemed poured on me,—  O Rosemary, O Rosemary!
There came a sail upon the bay,—  O Rosemary, didst thou foreknow? Two blue eyes wandered far away,  Two cheeks were all aglow:— A sail which neared and grew until It cast a heart in shadow chill; When someone's ship came in from sea,—  O Rosemary, O Rosemary!
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1927, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 96 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rosemary and Pansies/A Bookworm's Confession

A BOOKWORM'S CONFESSION