OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# New York Herald/1866/The Nine Thousand Dollar Jewelry Robbery At Newark, N.J.

Charles Frederick Lindauer (1836-1921) and Lewis Julius Lindauer (1838-1915) involved in the Baldwin Jewelry Robbery in the New York Herald on January 23, 1866. Louis Julius Lindauer is Charles Frederick Lindauer's brother, not his cousin. They often gave false names at arrest, or if identified, false relationships and false job descriptions. Their relationship is properly identified in other articles on the robbery and subsequent trial.
The Nine Thousand Dollar Jewelry Robbery At Newark, N.J. Yesterday afternoon Charles and Lewis Lindauer, recently arrested in New York on a charge of being implicated in the robbery of $9,000 worth of jewelry from the safe of Baldwin & Co., at Newark, on the night of the 9th of December, were taken before Justice Sandford for examination. Charles Lindauer being sworn made general denial of any connection with the robbery. He stated that he was not at the establishment of Messrs. Baldwin & Co. on the morning eight days previous to the robbery, when it is alleged that he visited the place with his cousin Louis and inquired in relation to a diamond; and further, that on the night of the robbery be was in various places in Broadway, above Grand street, New York. The examination was not concluded at six P.M. There were quite a number of witnesses present from New York, by whom the defendants proposed to prove an alibi.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# New York Herald/1853/The Missing Pilotboat Commerce

Matthew M. Betts (1796-1853) and others in the New York Herald on 27 January 1853.
The Missing Pilotboat Commerce. We have no tidings regarding the safety of this vessel. She was seen on the 12th inst off Egg Harbor, in company with pilot boat Nettle, No 2, with the wind from ENE, and blowing a gale; she hove to while in sight of the N[ettle], which is the last account we have of her. The pilots on board were: McKnight Smith, of Brooklyn; Mathew Betts, do; Thomas Scott, and Nelson Cole, of this city; Thos. Smith, apprentice (son of the pilot of that name on board); Roger Clark, of New London, boatkeeper. cook, and three men. They are among the most skillful of our pilots. Three of the pilots and the boatkeeper have families.
# Middletown Transcript/1898/An Old Family Bible

Edward Oldrin (1802-1874) in the Middletown Transcript on 10 September 1898.
An Old Family Bible.
Mrs. Billard, the daughter of the late Reverend Edward Oldrin, who lives on Bank street, Stamford, Connecticut, owns probably the oldest Bible in existence in the state. The Bible came into her possession by inheritance from her father, who was pastor of the Methodist church there, when the Hoyt brothers, two of them, Oliver and William, famous as millionaire leather merchants in the "Swamp," New York, became members of that church. The book is in the original binding and well preserved, the Old Testament part having been printed in 1597 and the New Testament in 1596. The covers are of wood, and the book is the size of the family Bible seen in the house of almost every New England family. Inscribed on the yellow fly leaf are the words: "Edward Oulldron owns this book", and after his death to his son Edward Oulldron, given by his grandmother - 1651." Later on it appears that the spelling of the family name had been changed, for below the name "John Oldrin" is the inscription: "Edward Oldrin's book, given by his father on his deathbed in the 1827, July 28, to be kept in the family."
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Looking Backward, 2000-1887/Chapter 21

Layout 2
​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/306 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/307 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/308 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/309 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/310 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/311 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/312 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/313 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/314 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/315 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/316 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/317 ​of the species ought to follow such a change. In certain specific respects we know, indeed, that the improvement has taken place. Insanity, for instance, which in the nineteenth century was so terribly common a product of your insane mode of life, has almost disappeared, with its alternative, suicide."
# Looking Backward, 2000-1887/Chapter 22

Layout 2
​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/319 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/320 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/321 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/322 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/323 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/324 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/325 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/326 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/327 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/328 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/329 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/330 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/331 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/332 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/333 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/334 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/335 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/336 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/337 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/338 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/339 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/340 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/341 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/342 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/343 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/344 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/345 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/346 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/347 ​only science, and in industrial production, selfishness is suicide. Competition, which is the instinct of selfishness, is another word for dissipation of energy, while combination is the secret of efficient production, and not till the idea of increasing the individual hoard gives place to the idea of increasing the common stock, can industrial combination be realized, and the acquisition of wealth really begin Even if the principle of share and share alike for all men were not the only humane and rational basis for a society, we should still enforce it as economically expedient, seeing that until the disintegrating influence of self-seeking is suppressed no true concert of industry is possible."
# Looking Backward, 2000-1887/Chapter 23

Layout 2
​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/349 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/350 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/351 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/352 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/353 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/354 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/355 ​one of them. I am usually of too practical a turn to waste time on such conundrums; but the difficulty of a riddle embodied in a beautiful young girl does not detract from its fascination. In general, no doubt, maiden's blushes may be safely assumed to tell the same tale to young men in all ages and races, but to give that interpretation to Edith's crimson cheeks, would, considering my position and the length of time I had known her, and still more the fact that this mystery dated from before I had known her at all, be a piece of utter fatuity. And yet she was an angel, and I should not have been a young man if reason and common sense had been able quite to banish a roseate tinge from my dreams that night.
# Looking Backward, 2000-1887/Chapter 24

Layout 2
​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/357 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/358 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/359 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/360 ​grandeur and completeness never before conceived, not as an association of men for certain merely political functions affecting their hap- piness only remotely and superficially, but as a family, a vital union, a common life, a mighty heaven-touching tree whose leaves are its people, fed from its veins, and feeding it in turn. The most patriotic of all possible parties, it sought to justify patriotism and raise it from an instinct to a rational devotion, by making the native land truly a father land, a father who kept the people alive and was not merely an idol for which they were expected to die."
# Looking Backward, 2000-1887/Chapter 25

Layout 2
​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/362 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/363 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/364 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/365 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/366 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/367 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/368 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/369 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/370 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/371 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/372 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/373 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/374 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/375 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/376 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/377 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/378 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/379 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/380 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/381 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/382 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/383 ​ing the modern view of parental responsibility. A similar situation would almost certainly have been treated by a nineteenth century romancist so as to excite the morbid sympathy of the reader with the sentimental selfishness of the lovers, and his resentment towards the unwritten law which they outraged. I need not describe—for who has not read "Ruth Elton"?—how different is the course which Berrian takes, and with what tremendous effect he enforces the principle which he states: "Over the unborn our power is that of God, and our responsibility like his towards us. As we acquit ourselves toward them, so let Him deal with us."
# Rose v. Arkansas State Police

Cite as: Rose v. Ark. State Police, 479 U.S. 1 (1986).
Supreme Court of the United States
479 U.S. 1
ROSE v. ARKANSAS STATE POLICE ET AL.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arkansas
No. 85-1388 Argued: . --- Decided: Nov. 3, 1986
After an Arkansas State Trooper was killed in the line of duty, his widow (petitioner) received a $50,000 benefit from the Federal Government pursuant to the Public Safety Officers' Death Benefits Act. The Act provides that its benefits "shall be in addition to any other benefit that may be due from any other source," with certain exceptions not applicable here. Petitioner also applied for death benefits under the Arkansas Workers' Compensation Act, which contains a provision (enacted three years after the federal Benefits Act) stating that benefits under the State Act shall be reduced by the amount of any federal payment under "an Act of Congress providing benefits for public safety officers." State administrative proceedings instituted by petitioner ultimately resulted in the rejection of her claim that her state benefits should not be offset by the federal payment. It was held that there was no inconsistency between the state and federal laws, and thus that the state statute need not give way under the Supremacy Clause of the Federal Constitution. The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed.
Held: The Arkansas statute authorizes the precise conduct that Congress sought to prohibit and consequently is repugnant to the Supremacy Clause. The conflict between the Arkansas law and the federal Benefits Act is clear from the language of the statutes. The state court's reasoning that the federal law did not alter the States' traditional right to set the level of workers' compensation benefits misses the point. The Benefits Act does not require a State to set a particular benefit level for its [p2] citizens; it simply prohibits a State from reducing the compensation it otherwise would provide to account for the federal payment. This reading of the Benefits Act is consistent with the legislative history, that shows that Congress was concerned about the inadequacy of death benefits paid to police officers by some States. Richardson v. Belcher, 404 U.S. 78, distinguished.
Certiorari granted; 16 Ark. App. 96, 697 S.W.2d 927, reversed and remanded.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Looking Backward, 2000-1887/Chapter 27

Layout 2
CHAPTER XXVII.
I NEVER could tell just why, but Sunday afternoon during my old life had been a time when I was peculiarly subject to melancholy, when the color unaccountably faded out of all the aspects of life, and everything appeared pathetically uninteresting. The hours, which in general were wont to bear me easily on their wings, lost the power of flight and, toward the close of the day drooping quite to earth, had fairly to be dragged along by main strength. Perhaps it was partly owing to the established association of ideas that, despite the utter change in my circumstances, I fell into a state of profound depression on the afternoon of this my first Sunday in the twentieth century.
It was not, however, on the present occasion a depression without specific cause, the ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/419 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/420 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/421 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/422 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/423 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/424 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/425 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/426 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/427 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/428 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/429 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/430 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/431 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/432 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/433 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/434 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/435 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/436 ​Page:Looking Backward, 2000-1887 (Bellamy).pdf/437 ​had told me of Edith Bartlett's marriage. Even while I had been holding Edith Bartlett's great grand-daughter in my arms, I had not, till this moment, so illogical are some of our feelings, distinctly realized that but for that marriage I could not have done so. The absurdity of this frame of mind could only be equalled by the abruptness with which it dissolved as Edith's roguish query cleared the fog from my perceptions. I laughed as I kissed her.
"You may assure her of my entire forgiveness," I said, "although if it had been any man but your great-grandfather whom she married, it would have been a very different matter."
On reaching my chamber that night I did not open the musical telephone that I might be lulled to sleep with soothing tunes, as had become my habit. For once my thoughts inade better music than even twentieth century orchestras discourse, and it held me enchanted till well toward morning, when I fell asleep.
# Konigsberg v. State Bar of California (353 U.S. 252)

Cite as: Konigsberg v. State Bar of California, 353 U.S. 252 (1957).
Supreme Court of the United States
353 U.S. 252
KONIGSBERG v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
Certiorari to the Supreme Court of California
No. 5 Argued: Jan. 14, 1957 --- Decided: May 6, 1957

## Dissenting Opinion

    Frankfurter
In 1954 the Committee of Bar Examiners of California refused to certify petitioner to practice law in that State, though he had satisfactorily passed the bar examination, on the grounds that he had failed to prove (1) that he was of good moral character, and (2) that he did not advocate forcible overthrow of the Government. He sought review by the State Supreme Court, contending that the Committee's action deprived him of rights secured by the Fourteenth Amendment. The State Supreme Court denied his petition without opinion. Held:
1. This Court has jurisdiction to review the case, and the constitutional issues are properly here. Pp. 254–258.
2. The evidence in the record does not rationally support the only two grounds upon which the Committee relied in rejecting petitioner's application, and therefore the State's refusal to admit him to the bar was a denial of due process and equal protection of the laws, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Pp. 258–274.
(a) That petitioner was a member of the Communist Party in 1941, if true, does not support an inference that he did not have good moral character, absent any evidence that he ever engaged in or abetted or supported any unlawful or immoral activities. Pp. 266–268.
(b) An inference of bad moral character cannot rationally be drawn from editorials in which petitioner severely criticized, inter alia, this country's participation in the Korean War, the actions and policies of the leaders of the major political parties, the influence of "big business" in American life, racial discrimination, and this Court's decisions in Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494, and other cases. Pp. 268–269.
(c) On the record in this case, inferences of bad moral character from petitioner's refusal to answer questions about his political affiliations and opinions are unwarranted. Pp. 269–271.
(d) There is no evidence in the record which rationally justifies a finding that petitioner failed to show that he did not advocate forcible overthrow of the Government. Pp. 271–274.
Reversed and remanded.
Edward Mosk argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Samuel Rosenwein.
Frank B. Belcher argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Ralph E. Lewis.
Briefs of amici curiae in support of petitioner were filed by A. L. Wirin for the American Civil Liberties Union, Southern California Branch, and Osmond K. Fraenkel for the National Lawyers Guild.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hudspeth v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
1 Ark. 20
HUDSPETH v. THE STATE
Error to the City Court of Little Rock
No. Jan. 1837
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
A motion was made by the Attorney for the State to dismiss this case, on the ground set forth in the opinion.
HALL and TAYLOR, contra.
RINGO, Ch. J., delivered the opinion of the Court: A motion to dismiss this case having been made for the prosecuting Attorney for the State, and argued by counsel, we have examined the papers in the case and fine a writ of error issued to the City Court of the city of Little Rock, to remove into this Court the record and proceedings in a certain indictment in said City Court for keeping a gaming house, wherein the City of Little Rock was plaintiff and Charles M. Hudspeth was defendant, returned with said writ of error, and annexed thereto is a transcript of the record and proceedings on an indictment in said City Court, for keeping a gaming house, prosecuted in the name of the United States of America vs. Charles M. Hudspeth; also a summons to hear errors in the usual form, addressed to the constable of the city of Little Rock, commanding him to summon ALBERT PIKE, Solicitor for said city, to appear to answer a writ of error issued to the City Court of Little Rock in a certain indictment in said court, in behalf of the City of Little Rock against Charles M. Hudspeth.
The parties to the record returned with the writ of error appear to be different from those to the record and proceedings required by the writ of error to be removed to this Court, and there is no record between the parties named in the writ of error returned therewith into this Court. The proceedings are therefore wholly irregular, and no case is thereby brought into this court of which the Court can take cognizance. It is therefore deemed unnecessary at present to declare the effect of a failure to give the defendant in error notice, as required by law, or to whom the same ought to be given, if any. The writ of error must be dismissed.
It is therefore considered by the Court here that the State of Arkansas have and recover of the plaintiff in error all the costs in this suit expended.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# The Brooklyn Eagle

Content exists for this periodical, though at this stage it is not specifically organised beyond a basic hierarchy.
The pages listed below are an automatically generated listing.
Special:PrefixIndex/The Brooklyn Eagle/
# The Standard Union/1917/Cornelia A. Patterson

* related portals: Cornelia Augusta Betts, Richard Barnsley Patterson.
* sister projects: Commons category, Wikidata item.
Cornelia Augusta Betts (1837-1917) in The Standard Union on June 26, 1917.
Cornelia A. Patterson
Cornelia A. Patterson died on Sunday at her home, 1485 Jefferson avenue. She was the widow of Richard B. Patterson. The funeral will be held to-night at 8 o'clock.