OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 30

Chap. XXX.—An Act in addition to an act, intituled “An act, in addition to an act regulating the grants of land appropriated for military services, and for the society of the United Brethren, for propagating the gospel among the Heathen.”
Act of March 1, 1800, ch. 13. Act of March 3, 1803, ch. 30. How the holders of certain warrants for military services, or register’s certificates, may register or locate the same.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the passing of this act, and until the first day of January next, it shall be lawful for the holders or proprietors of warrants heretofore granted in consideration of military services, or register’s certificates of fifty acres, or more, granted, or hereafter to be granted agreeable to the third section of an act intituled “An act in addition to an act, intituled An act regulating the grants of land appropriated for military services; and for the society of the United Brethren for propagating the gospel among the Heathen,” approved the first day of March one thousand eight hundred, to register and locate the same, in the same manner, and under the same restrictions, as might have been done before the first day of January last: Provided,Provision with respect to certain register’s certificates. that persons holding register’s certificates for a less quantity than one hundred acres, may locate the same on such parts of fractional townships, as shall, for that purpose, be divided by the Secretary of the Treasury into lots of fifty acres each.
​Secretary of War to receive claims to lands, and for duplicates of warrants, suggested to have been lost. To report the same to Congress, with his opinion.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That it shall be the duty of the Secretary of War to receive claims to lands for military services, and claims for duplicates of warrants issued from his office, or from the land office of Virginia, or of plats and certificates of surveys founded on such warrants, suggested to have been lost or destroyed, until the first day of January next, and no longer; and immediately thereafter, to report the same to Congress, designating the numbers of claims of each description, with his opinion thereon.
Approved, April 26, 1802.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 35

Chap. XXXV.—An Act to regulate and fix the compensations of the officers of the Senate and House of Representatives.
Salaries of the Secretary of the Senate, Clerk of the House of Representatives, &c. 1806, ch. 23.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the officers of the Senate and House of Representatives herein after mentioned, shall be, and hereby are entitled to receive in lieu of their compensations as fixed by law, the following sums; that is to say: the secretary of the senate, and clerk of the House of Representatives, two thousand dollars, each; their principal clerks one thousand three hundred dollars, each; and each of their engrossing clerks, one thousand dollars per annum.
Of the sergeant-at-arms of the Senate.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the sergeant-at-arms of the Senate, who also performs the duty of doorkeeper, and the sergeant-at-arms of the House of Representatives, ​shall be, and hereby are entitled to receive eight hundred dollars per annum, each.
Of the doorkeeper and assistant doorkeeper of the House of Representatives.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That the doorkeeper of the House of Representatives shall be, and hereby is entitled to receive five hundred dollars per annum, and two dollars per day, during each session of Congress; and the assistant doorkeeper of the Senate and House of Representatives, four hundred and fifty dollars per annum, each, and two dollars each, per day, during each session of Congress.
Commencement of the salaries.Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That the compensations to the secretary of the Senate and clerk of the House of Representatives, and to their clerks, and to the other officers herein named, shall commence with the present year.
Approved, April 29, 1802.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 37

Chap. XXXVII.—An Act to amend “An act to establish the compensations of the officers employed in the collection of the duties on imports and tonnage; and for other purposes.”
Act of March 2, 1799, ch. 22. Additional compensation to the collector at Richmond. Discontinued 1804, ch. 58.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the thirtieth day of June, in the present year, there shall be paid, annually, to the collector of the customs for the district of Richmond, in addition to the fees and emoluments otherwise allowed by law, the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars.
Salary to the collector at Petersburg discontinued.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That from and after the said thirtieth day of June, the salary heretofore allowed by law to the collector of the customs for the district of Petersburg be, and the same is hereby is discontinued.
Emoluments of custom-houses limited.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That from and after the said thirtieth day of June, whenever the annual emoluments of any collector of the customs, after deducting therefrom the expenditures incident to his office, shall amount to more than five thousand dollars; or those of a naval officer, after like deduction, to more than three thousand five ​hundred dollars, or those of a surveyor, after a like deduction, to more than three thousand dollars, the surplus shall be accounted for, and be paid by them, respectively, to the treasury of the United States: Provided always, that nothingBut the provisions of this act not to extend to fines, &c. in this act contained shall be construed to extend to fines, forfeitures and penalties, under the revenue laws of the United States.
Approved, April 30, 1802.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 38

Chap. XXXVIII.—An Act to suspend, in part, the act intituled “An act regulating foreign coins; and for other purposes.”
Part of the act for regulating foreign coins, &c. Act of August 4, 1790, ch. 35. Act of Feb. 9, 1793, ch. 5. Act of April 10, 1806, ch. 22.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That so much of the act, intituled “An act for regulating foreign coins, and for other purposes,” as is contained within the second section thereof, be and the same hereby is suspended, for and during the space of three years, from and after the end of the present session of Congress.
Approved, April 30, 1802.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 26

Chap. XXVI.—An Act to amend an act, intituled “An act to retain a further sum on drawbacks, for the expenses incident to the allowance and payment thereof, and in lieu of stamp duties on debentures.”
1800, ch. 64. Part of a former law not to operate upon unregistered ships, &c. In certain cases.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the second section of the act, intituled “An act to retain a further sum on drawbacks, for the expenses incident to the allowance and payment thereof, and in lieu of stamp duties on debentures,” shall not be deemed to operate upon unregistered ships or vessels owned by the citizens of the United States, at the time of passing the said act, in those cases where such ship or vessel, at that time, possessed a sea letter, or other regular document issued from a custom-house of the United States, proving such ship or vessel to be American property.
Upon proof, the Secretary of the Treasury to cause a certificate to be issued to an unregistered ship or vessel, entitling her to certain privileges.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That whenever satisfactory proof shall be made to the Secretary of the Treasury, that any unregistered ship or vessel was, in fact, the property, in whole, of a citizen or citizens of the United States, on the thirteenth day of May, in the year one thousand eight hundred, that the Secretary of the Treasury be, and he is hereby authorized and directed to cause to be issued to such ship or vessel, a certificate, which shall entitle such unregistered ship or vessel to the same privileges which are herein before granted to unregistered ships or vessels owned by citizens of the United States, and carrying a sea letter, or other regular document issued from a custom-house of the United States, before the passing of the said act, intituled “An act to retain a further sum on drawbacks, for the expenses incident to the allowance and payment thereof, and in lieu of stamp duties on debentures.”
Approved, April 14, 1802.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/7th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 33

Chap. XXXIII.—An Act for the relief of the widows and orphans of certain persons who have died in the naval service of the United States.
Appropriation for the children of officers, seamen and marines lost in the ship Insurgent, and brigantine Pickering.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the widows, if any such there be, and in case there be no widow, the child or children of the officers, seamen and marines, who were in the service of the United States, and lost in the ship Insurgent and brigantine Pickering, shall be entitled to, and receive out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated, a sum equal to four months pay of their respective husbands or fathers, as aforesaid.
Approved, April 29, 1802.
# United States Gypsum Co v. National Gypsum Cet Al

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
352 U.S. 457
UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO. v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. ET AL.,

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Gypsum Company v. National Gypsum Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, news, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
352 U.S. 457
United States Gypsum Company v. National Gypsum Company
Argued: Nov. 5 and 6, 1956. --- Decided: Feb 25, 1957
See 353 U.S. 932, 77 S.Ct. 716.
[Syllabus from pages 457-458 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Bruce Bromley, New York, City, for appellant.
Mr. Samuel I Rosenman, New York City, for appellee National Gypsum Company.
Mr.Norman A. Miller, Chicago, Ill., for appellee Certain-Teed Products Corporation.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Gypsum Co v. National Gypsum Cet Al/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
352 U.S. 457
UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO. v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. ET AL.,
The motion of appellant for recall and modification of the judgment is denied without prejudice to the Solicitor General moving to dissolve the three-judge district court. MR. JUSTICE CLARK took no part in the consideration of decision of this motion. Bruce Bromley, Cranston Spray, Robert C. Keck, John D. Calhoun and Hugh Lynch, Jr. for appellant-movant. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Charles H. Weston and Edward Knuff for the United States, and Samuel I. Rosenman, Elmer E. Finck, Seymour D. Lewis, Malcolm A. Hoffmann and Seymour Krieger for the National Gypsum Co., appellees.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Hall v. Payne

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
254 U.S. 343
United States Hall v. Payne
Argued: Nov. 17, 1920. --- Decided: Dec 13, 1920
Mr. Patrick H. Loughran, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error.
The Attorney General and Assistant Attorney General Nebeker, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McKENNA delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Handler v. Hill

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 736
United States Handler v. Hill
Mr. Lewis Landes, of New York City, for petitioner.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Handler v. Hill/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 736
United States Handler v. Hill
For opinion below, see 90 F.(2d) 573.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied for the reason that the application for writ of certiorari was not made within the time provided by law. Section 8(a), Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 940 [[[28 U.S.C.A. § 350]]]).

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Patryas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
303 U.S. 341
United States v. Patryas
Argued: Feb. 11, 1938. --- Decided: Feb 28, 1938
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Wilbur C. Pickett, of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
Mr. Warren E. Miller, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Patrick

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 53
United States v. Patrick
Argued: Dec. 6, 1962. --- Decided: Feb 18, 1963
Wayne G. Barnett, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Robert M. Ward, Rock Hill, S.C., for respondents.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Patten

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
226 U.S. 525
United States v. Patten
Argued: November 9 and 10, 1911. ---
Ordered for reargument before full bench April 29. 1912.
Reargued October 23 and 24, 1912.
Decided January 6, 1913.
[Syllabus from pages 525-527 intentionally omitted]
Former Solicitor General Lehmann and Solicitor General Bullitt for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 527-531 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. George P. Merrick, Henry Wollman, William E. Church for defendant in error.
Messrs. John C. Spooner, Joseph P. Colton, Jr., and George Rublee for defendants in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 532-534 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Van Devanter delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Patterson

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Patterson."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Patterson (56 U.S. 10)
* United States v. Patterson (150 U.S. 65)
See also Patterson v. United States.
# United States v. Citroen

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
223 U.S. 407
United States v. Citroen
Argued: November 1, 1911. --- Decided: February 19, 1912
Assistant to the Attorney General Fowler for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 408-410 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. W. Wickham Smith and John K. Maxwell for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 410-413 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Christian Echoes National Ministry Inc

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
404 U.S. 561
United States v. Christian Echoes National Ministry, Inc.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
No. 71-565
Appellee, a nonprofit religious corporation, brought this refund suit, claiming that it was entitled to tax-exempt status under § 501 (c)(3) of the 1954 Internal Revenue Code. The District Court held that under the facts adduced at trial appellee qualified for exemption. It went on, however, to conclude that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in revoking that exemption violated (1) free exercise requirements by analyzing each activity of appellee and classifying it as "religious" or "political," and (2) due process requirements by singling appellee out, among all other religious organizations, for investigation and exemption revocation without supporting evidence.
Held: This Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the direct appeal that the Government seeks to take under 28 U.S.C. § 1252 from the District Court's decision, which did not hold § 501 (c)(3) unconstitutional as a whole or as applied, but was merely directed at the method and means by which the IRS enforced § 501 (c)(3) in this case.
Vacated and remanded.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Citizens Loan & Trust Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
316 U.S. 209
United States v. Citizens Loan & Trust Company
Argued: April 6, 1942. --- Decided: May 4, 1942
Mr. Wilbur C. Pickett, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Camden R. McAtee, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BYRNES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Circuit Judges

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Johnson Field
United States Supreme Court
70 U.S. 673
United States v. Circuit Judges
THE fourth section of an act of Congress of July 1, 1864, 'To expedite the settlement of titles to lands in the State of California,' provides as follows:
'That whenever the district judge of any one of the District Courts of the United States for California is interested in any land the claim to which, under the said act of March 3, 1851, is pending before him on appeal from the Board of Commissioners created by said act, the said District Court shall order the case to be transferred to the Circuit Court of the United States for California, which court shall thereupon take jurisdiction and determine the same. The said District Courts may also order a transfer, to the said Circuit Court, of any other cases arising under said act pending before them affecting the title to lands within the corporate limits of any city or town; and in such cases both the district and circuit judges may sit.'
An appeal pending in the District Court for the Northern District of California from a decree of the Board of Commissioners,-the United States being a party on one side and the City of San Francisco party on the other-was transferred from the District Court to the Circuit under the above section. It was there heard and decided in favor of the city; and the United States, represented by the attorney-general, considering itself aggrieved by the decree, applied in due form to the Circuit Court for an appeal to this court. The application, after full consideration, was denied, on the ground that upon a true construction of the section above quoted no appeal had been provided for.
The section itself, it will be seen, provides for no appeal.
On a petition by the United States for a mandamus to the judges of the Circuit Court to allow one, the question accordingly was whether under the Constitution and different statutes of the United States any appeal lay.
Mr. Assistant Attorney-General Ashton and Mr. Black, for the relators and in support of the motion; Mr. W. W. Cope, contra.
Mr. Justice NELSON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

* ↑ 13 Id. 333.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/25th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 170

Chap. CLXX.—An Act to provide for the settlement of the claim of the State of New York for the services of her militia.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Sec. War to cause New York to be paid such amount as the Paymaster Gen’l. and account’g officers of the Treasury shall certify, &c. That the Secretary of War be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to cause to be reimbursed and paid to the State of New York, on the order of the Governor of said State, out of the appropriation for the prevention of hostilities on the northern frontier, such amount as the Paymaster General of the United States army and the accounting officers of the Treasury shall ascertain and certify would have been due from the United States to the volunteers and militia called into the service of the State, in the latter part of the year eighteen hundred and thirty-seven and the first part of the year eighteen hundred and thirty-eight, for the protection of said frontier, by the Governor, if said volunteers had been duly called into the service of the United States and regularly received and mustered by officers of the United States army, according to the laws and regulations which have governed in the payment of the volunteers and militia of other States:Proviso. Provided, That the accounts of the agent employed by the State of New York to make said payments, be submitted to the Paymaster General and the accounting officers for their inspection: And provided also,Proviso. That no reimbursement shall be made on account of the payment of any volunteers or militia who refused to be received and mustered into the service of the United States or to serve under the officers of the United States army appointed by the President to command on the northern frontier.
Approved, July 7, 1838.