OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar/40. Tenses. Moods. Flexion

Layout 2
A. Ungnad, ‘Die gegenseitigen Beziehungen der Verbalformen im Grundstamm des semit. Verbs,’ in ZDMG. 59 (1905), 766 ff., and his ‘Zum hebr. Verbalsystem’, in Beiträge zur Assyriologie ed. by Fr. Delitzsch and P. Haupt, 1907, p. 55 ff.
a 1. While the Hebrew verb, owing to these derivative forms or conjugations, possesses a certain richness and copiousness, it is, on the other hand, poor in the matter of tenses and moods. The verb has only two tense-forms (Perfect and Imperfect, see the note on § 47 a), besides an Imperative (but only in the active), two Infinitives and a Participle. All relations of time, absolute and relative, are expressed either by these forms (hence a certain diversity in their meaning, § 106 ff.) or by syntactical combinations. Of moods properly so called (besides the Imperfect Indicative and Imperative), only the Jussive and Optativeare sometimes indicated by express modifications of the Imperfect-form (§ 48).
b 2. The inflexion of the Perfect, Imperfect, and Imperative as to persons, differs from that of the Western languages in having, to a great extent, distinct forms for the two genders, which correspond to the different forms of the personal pronoun. It is from the union of the pronoun with the verbal stem that the personal inflexions of these tenses arise.
c The following table will serve for the beginner as a provisional scheme of the formative syllables (afformatives and preformatives) of the two tenses. The three stem-consonants of the strong verb are denoted by dots. Cf. § 44 ff. and the Paradigms.
Perfect :
| Singular. | Singular. | Singular. | Singular. | Singular. | Singular. | Singular. | Plural. | Plural. | Plural. | Plural. | Plural. | Plural. | Plural. |
| 3. | m. | | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | 3. | 3. | c. | וּ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | |
| 3. | f. | ־ָה | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | | | | | | | | |
| 2. | m. | תָּ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | 2. | 2. | m. | תֶּם | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | |
| 2. | f. | תְּ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | 2. | 2. | f. | תֶּן | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | |
| 1. | c. | תִּי | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | 1. | 1. | c. | נוּ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | |
| Imperfect ||||||||||||||
| Singular. | Singular. | Singular. | Singular. | Singular. | Singular. | Singular. | Plural. | Plural. | Plural. | Plural. | Plural. | Plural. | Plural. |
| 3. | m. | | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | י | 3. | m. | וּ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | י |
| 3. | f. | | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | תּ | 3. | f. | נָה | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | תּ |
| 2. | m. | | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | תּ | 2. | m. | וּ | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | תּ |
| 2. | f. | ־ִי | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | תּ | 2. | f. | נָה | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | תּ |
| 1. | c. | | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | א | 1. | c. | | ∙ | ∙ | ∙ | נ‍ |
# Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar/38. The Verb: General View

Layout 2
CHAPTER II
THE VERB
a Verbal stems are either original or derived. They are usually divided into—
(a) Verbal stems proper (primitive verbs), which exhibit the stem without any addition, e.g. מָלַךְ he has reigned.
b (b) Verbal derivatives, i.e. secondary verbal stems, derived from the pure stem (letter a), e.g. קִדַּשׁ to sanctify, הִתְקַדֵּשׁ to sanctify oneself, from קָדַשׁ to be holy. These are usually called conjugations (§ 39).
c (c) Denominatives, i.e. verbs derived from nouns (like the Latin causari, praedari, and Eng. to skin, to stone), or even from particles (see d, end) either in a primitive or derivative form, e.g. אָהַל, Qal and Piʿēl, to pitch a tent, from אֹ֫הֶל tent; הִשְׁרִישׁ and שֹׁרֵשׁ to take root, and שֵׁרֵשׁ to root out, from שֹׁרֶשׁ root (§ 52 h).
d This does not exclude the possibility that, for nouns, from which denominative verbs are derived, the corresponding (original) verbal stem may still be found either in Hebrew or in the dialects. The meaning, however, is sufficient to show that the denominatives have come from the noun, not from the verbal stem, e.g. לְבֵנָה a brick (verbal stem לבן to be white), denomin. לָבַן to make bricks; דָּג a fish (verbal stem דָּגָה to be prolific), denomin. דּוּג to fish; חָרַף to winter (from חֹ֫רֶף autumn, winter, stem חָרַף to pluck); קוּץ to pass the summer (from קַ֫יִץ summer, stem קִיץ to be hot).
On ‘Semitic verbs derived from particles’ see P. Haupt in the Amer. Journ. of Sem. Lang., xxii (1906), 257 ff.
# Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar/42. The Strong Verb

Layout 2
I. The Strong Verb.
As the formation of the strong verb is the model also for the weak verb, a statement of the general formative laws should precede the treatment of special cases.
Paradigm B, together with the Table of the personal preformatives and afformatives given in § 40 c, offers a complete survey of the normal forms. A full explanation of them is given in the following sections (§§ 43–55), where each point is elucidated on its first occurrence; thus e.g. the inflexion of the Perfect, the Imperfect and its modifications, will be found under Qal, &c.
# For the People Act of 2021 (H.R. 1; 117th Congress)/Division C/Title VII/Subtitle F

117th congress (2021-2022)

#### SEC. 7501. SEVERABILITY.

If any provision of this title or amendment made by this title, or the application of a provision or amendment to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this title and amendments made by this title, and the application of the provisions and amendment to any person or circumstance, shall not be affected by the holding.
# For the People Act of 2021 (H.R. 1; 117th Congress)/Division C/Title VIII

117th congress (2021-2022)
       Subtitle A − Executive Branch Conflict Of Interest
       Subtitle B − Presidential Conflicts Of Interest
       Subtitle C − White House Ethics Transparency
       Subtitle D − Executive Branch Ethics Enforcement
       Subtitle E − Conflicts From Political Fundraising
       Subtitle F − Transition Team Ethics
       Subtitle G − Ethics Pledge For Senior Executive Branch Employees
       Subtitle H − Travel On Private Aircraft By Senior Political Appointees
       Subtitle I − Severability
# For the People Act of 2021 (H.R. 1; 117th Congress)/Division C/Title VII/Subtitle E

117th congress (2021-2022)

#### SEC. 7401. ESTABLISHMENT OF CLEARINGHOUSE.

    (a) Establishment.—The Attorney General shall establish and operate within the Department of Justice a clearinghouse through which members of the public may obtain copies (including in electronic form) of registration statements filed under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) and the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended (22 U.S.C. 611 et seq.).
    (b) Format.—The Attorney General shall ensure that the information in the clearinghouse established under this Act is maintained in a searchable and sortable format.
    (c) Agreements With Clerk Of House And Secretary Of The Senate.—The Attorney General shall enter into such agreements with the Clerk of the House of Representatives and the Secretary of the Senate as may be necessary for the Attorney General to obtain registration statements filed with the Clerk and the Secretary under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 for inclusion in the clearinghouse.
# For the People Act of 2021 (H.R. 1; 117th Congress)/Division C/Title VIII/Subtitle C

117th congress (2021-2022)

#### SEC. 8021. SHORT TITLE.

This subtitle may be cited as the “White House Ethics Transparency Act of 2021”.

#### SEC. 8022. PROCEDURE FOR WAIVERS AND AUTHORIZATIONS RELATING TO ETHICS REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not later than 30 days after an officer or employee issues or approves a waiver or authorization pursuant to section 3 of Executive Order No. 13770 (82 6 Fed. Reg. 9333), or any subsequent similar order, such officer or employee shall—
       (1) transmit a written copy of such waiver or authorization to the Director of the Office of Government Ethics; and
       (2) make a written copy of such waiver or authorization available to the public on the website of the employing agency of the covered employee.
    (b) Retroactive Application.—In the case of a waiver or authorization described in subsection (a) issued during the period beginning on January 20, 2017, and ending on the date of enactment of this Act, the issuing officer or employee of such waiver or authorization shall comply with the requirements of paragraphs (1) and (2) of such subsection not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Office Of Government Ethics Public Availability.—Not later than 30 days after receiving a written copy of a waiver or authorization under subsection (a)(1), the Director of the Office of Government Ethics shall make such waiver or authorization available to the public on the website of the Office of Government Ethics.
    (d) Report To Congress.—Not later than 45 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Government Ethics shall submit a report to Congress on the impact of the application of subsection (b), including the name of any individual who received a waiver or authorization described in subsection (a) and who, by operation of subsection (b), submitted the information required by such subsection.
    (e) Definition Of Covered Employee.—In this section, the term “covered employee”—
       (1) means a non-career Presidential or Vice Presidential appointee, non-career appointee in the Senior Executive Service (or other SES-type system), or an appointee to a position that has been excepted from the competitive service by reason of being of a confidential or policymaking character (Schedule C and other positions excepted under comparable criteria) in an executive agency; and
       (2) does not include any individual appointed as a member of the Senior Foreign Service or solely as a uniformed service commissioned officer.
# For the People Act of 2021 (H.R. 1; 117th Congress)/Division C/Title VII/Subtitle D

117th congress (2021-2022)

#### SEC. 7301. RECUSAL OF APPOINTEES.

Section 208 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
    “(e) (1) Any officer or employee appointed by the President shall recuse himself or herself from any particular matter involving specific parties in which a party to that matter is—
          “(A) the President who appointed the officer or employee, which shall include any entity in which the President has a substantial interest; or
          “(B) the spouse of the President who appointed the officer or employee, which shall include any entity in which the spouse of the President has a substantial interest.
       “(2) (A) Subject to subparagraph (B), if an officer or employee is recused under paragraph (1), a career appointee in the agency of the officer or employee shall perform the functions and duties of the officer or employee with respect to the matter.
          “(B) (i) In this subparagraph, the term ‘Commission’ means a board, commission, or other agency for which the authority of the agency is vested in more than 1 member.
             “(ii) If the recusal of a member of a Commission from a matter under paragraph (1) would result in there not being a statutorily required quorum of members of the Commission available to participate in the matter, notwithstanding such statute or any other provision of law, the members of the Commission not recused under paragraph (1) may—
                “(I) consider the matter without regard to the quorum requirement under such statute;
                “(II) delegate the authorities and responsibilities of the Commission with respect to the matter to a subcommittee of the Commission; or
                “(III) designate an officer or employee of the Commission who was not appointed by the President who appointed the member of the Commission recused from the matter to exercise the authorities and duties of the recused member with respect to the matter.
       “(3) Any officer or employee who violates paragraph (1) shall be subject to the penalties set forth in section 216.
       “(4) For purposes of this section, the term ‘particular matter’ shall have the meaning given the term in section 207(i).”.
# For the People Act of 2021 (H.R. 1; 117th Congress)/Division C/Title VIII/Subtitle F

117th congress (2021-2022)

#### SEC. 8051. SHORT TITLE.

This subtitle may be cited as the “Transition Team Ethics Improvement Act”.

#### SEC. 8052. PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITION ETHICS PROGRAMS.

The Presidential Transition Act of 1963 (3 U.S.C. 102 note) is amended—
    (1) in section 3(f), by adding at the end the following:
    “(3) Not later than 10 days after submitting an application for a security clearance for any individual, and not later than 10 days after any such individual is granted a security clearance (including an interim clearance), each eligible candidate (as that term is described in subsection (h)(4)(A)) or the President-elect (as the case may be) shall submit a report containing the name of such individual to the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate.”; and
    (2) in section 6(b)—
       (A) in paragraph (1)—
          (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking “and” at the end;
          (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and
          (iii) by adding at the end the following:
       “(C) a list of all positions each transition team member has held outside the Federal Government for the previous 12-month period, including paid and unpaid positions;
       “(D) sources of compensation for each transition team member exceeding $5,000 a year for the previous 12-month period;
       “(E) a description of the role of each transition team member, including a list of any policy issues that the member expects to work on, and a list of agencies the member expects to interact with, while serving on the transition team;
       “(F) a list of any issues from which each transition team member will be recused while serving as a member of the transition team pursuant to the transition team ethics plan outlined in section 4(g)(3); and
       “(G) an affirmation that no transition team member has a financial conflict of interest that precludes the member from working on the matters described in subparagraph (E).”;
       (B) in paragraph (2), by inserting “not later than 2 business days” after “public”; and
       (C) by adding at the end the following:
    “(3) The head of a Federal department or agency, or their designee, shall not permit access to the Federal department or agency, or employees of such department or agency, that would not be provided to a member of the public for any transition team member who does not make the disclosures listed under paragraph (1).”.
# Executive Order 13359

more info.
See the Notes section for a list of Executive Orders affected by or related to the issuance of this Executive Order.
Signed by President George W. Bush Wednesday, October 20, 2004
Federal Register page & date: 69 FR 62391, Monday, October 25, 2004
Executive Order 13359 of October 20, 2004
Amendment to Executive Order 13173, Interagency Task Force on the Economic Development of the Central San Joaquin Valley
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to improve the operation of the Interagency Task Force on the Economic Development of the Central San Joaquin Valley, it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 13173 of October 25, 2000, is amended as follows:
Section 1.
    Section 1(b) is amended to read as follows:
       "The Task Force shall consist exclusively of the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Education, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of Labor, the Secretary of Transportation, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, the Director of National Drug Control Policy, the Administrator of General Services, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, or their designees, and such other senior executive branch officials as may be determined by the Task Force. The Chair of the Task Force shall be the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. Each of the Federal departments and agencies, as appropriate, shall designate one staff person, for the years 2004 through 2006, to work on issues of the Task Force and to ensure the participation of the staff person's department or agency in the operations of the Task Force."
Sec. 2.
    Section 1(c)(1) is amended by inserting "regulations," after "analyze".
Sec. 3.
    Section 5 is amended to read as follows:
       "Judicial Review. This order is intended only to improve the internal management of the Federal Government and is not intended to, and does not, create any right, benefit, or trust responsibility, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by a party against the United States, its agencies, entities, its officers or employees, or any other person."

## Notes

Shortcut: WS:USEO

### Amends

* Executive Order 13173, October 25, 2000
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 13362

more info.
See the Notes section for a list of Executive Orders affected by or related to the issuance of this Executive Order.
Signed by President George W. Bush Monday, November 29, 2004
Federal Register page & date: 69 FR 70173, Thursday, December 2, 2004
Executive Order 13362 of November 29, 2004
Designation of Additional Officers for the Department of Homeland Security Order of Succession
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America and pursuant to the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345 et seq., it is hereby ordered that:
Section 1.
    During any period when the Secretary of Homeland Security (Secretary), the Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security, and the officers designated to perform the functions and duties of the office of Secretary by section 88 of Executive Order 13286 of February 28, 2003 ("Amendment of Executive Orders, and Other Actions, in Connection With the Transfer of Certain Functions to the Secretary of Homeland Security"), have died, resigned, or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of Secretary, the following officers of the Department of Homeland Security, in the order listed, shall perform the functions and duties of the office of Secretary, if they are eligible to act as Secretary under the provisions of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, until such time as at least one of the officers mentioned above is able to perform the functions and duties of the office of Secretary:
       Director, Region V, Federal Emergency Management Agency;
       Director, Region VI, Federal Emergency Management Agency;
       Director, Region VII, Federal Emergency Management Agency;
       Director, Region VIII, Federal Emergency Management Agency; and
       Director, Region X, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Sec. 2. Exceptions.

   ## (a)

       No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1 in an acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, shall act as Secretary pursuant to this order.

   ## (b)

       Notwithstanding the provisions of this order, the President retains discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this order in designating an acting Secretary.

## Notes

Shortcut: WS:USEO

### See Related

* Executive Order 13286, February 28, 2003

### Revoked by

* Executive Order 13442, August 13, 2007
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia v. Brailsford (2 U.S. 402)/Separate Blair

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinions in Seriatim
* Dissenting Opinions Johnson Cushing
* Separate Opinions Iredell Blair Wilson Jay
​Blair, Justice.The State of Georgia seems to have done all that she could to obtain a hearing. An application was made to the Circuit court, in the nature of a claim to interplead; but being refused, her alternative, under all the circumstances of the case, is an appeal to the equitable jurisdiction of the Supreme ​court. It is true, perhaps, as the counsel has suggested, that the defendant below pleaded the confiscation act of Georgia in bar to the action; but it is a sufficient answer to this argument, that the State was not a party; and no right can be defeated, in law, unless the party claiming it, has himself an opportunity to support it.
If the State of Georgia was entitled to the bond, she is equally entitled to the money levied by the marshall in satisfaction of the bond, or rather of the judgment rendered upon it: And as the execution directs the marshall to pay the amount to the plaintiffs below, I can perceive no other mode of preventing a compliance, while we enquire into the right of receiving the money, than that of issuing an injunction to stay it in the hands of the officer.
It appears to me to be too early, likewise, to pronounce an opinion upon the titles in collision; since it is enough, on a motion of this kind, to shew a colorable title. The State of Georgia has set up her confiscation act, which certainly is a fair foundation for future judicial investigation; and that an injury may not be done, which it may be out of our power to repair, the injunction ought, I think, to issue, till we are enabled, by a full enquiry, to decide upon the whole merits of the case.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia v. Brailsford (2 U.S. 402)/Separate Jay

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinions in Seriatim
* Dissenting Opinions Johnson Cushing
* Separate Opinions Iredell Blair Wilson Jay
​Jay, Chief Justice.My first ideas were unfavorable to the motion; but many reasons have been urged, which operate forcibly to produce a change of opinion.
The great question turns on the property of a certain bond;—whether it belongs to Brailsford, or to Georgia? It is put in suit by Brailsford; but if Georgia, by virtue of the confiscation act, is really entitled to the debt, she is entitled to the money, though the evidence of the debt happened to be in the possession of Brailsford, and though Brailsford has, by that means, obtained a judgment for the amount.
Then the only point to be considered is—whether, under these circumstances, it is not equitable to stay the money in the ​hands of the marshall, ’till the right to it is fairly decided; and to avoid the risque of putting the true owner to a suit, for the purpose of recovering it back?
For my part, I think that the money should remain in the custody of the law, till the law has adjudged to whom it belongs; and, therefore, I am content, that the injunction issue.
An Injunction granted.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse