OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Liber Resh vel Helios

* information about this edition.
* related portals: Religion.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

# Liber Resh vel Helios sub figurâ CC
## Publication in class D

0. These are the adorations to be performed by all aspirants to the A.·. A.·..
1. Let him greet the Sun at dawn, facing East, giving the sign of his grade. And let him say in a loud voice: Hail unto Thee who art Ra in Thy rising, even unto Thee who art Ra in Thy strength, who travellest over the Heavens in Thy bark at the Uprising of the Sun. Tahuti standeth in His splendour at the prow, and Ra-Hoor abideth at the helm. Hail unto Thee from the Abodes of Night!
2. Also at Noon, let him greet the Sun, facing South, giving the sign of his grade. And let him say in a loud voice: Hail unto Thee who art Ahathoor in Thy triumphing, even unto Thee who art Ahathoor in Thy beauty, who travellest over the heavens in thy bark at the Mid-course of the Sun. Tahuti standeth in His splendour at the prow, and Ra-Hoor abideth at the helm. Hail unto Thee from the Abodes of Morning!
3. Also, at Sunset, let him greet the Sun, facing West, giving the sign of his grade. And let him say in a loud voice: Hail unto Thee who art Tum in Thy setting, even unto Thee who art Tum in Thy joy, who travellest over the Heavens in Thy bark at the Down-going of the Sun. Tahuti standeth in His splendour at the prow, and Ra-Hoor abideth at the helm. Hail unto Thee from the Abodes of Day!
4. Lastly, at Midnight, let him greet the Sun, facing North, giving the sign of his grade, and let him say in a loud voice: Hail unto thee who art Khephra in Thy hiding, even unto Thee who art Khephra in Thy silence, who travellest over the heavens in Thy bark at the Midnight Hour of the Sun. Tahuti standeth in His splendour at the prow, and Ra-Hoor abideth at the helm. Hail unto Thee from the Abodes of Evening.
5. And after each of these invocations thou shalt give the sign of silence, and afterward thou shalt perform the adoration that is taught thee by thy Superior. And then do thou compose Thyself to holy meditation.
6. Also it is better if in these adorations thou assume the God-form of Whom thou adorest, as if thou didst unite with Him in the adoration of That which is beyond Him.
7. Thus shalt thou ever be mindful of the Great Work which thou hast undertaken to perform, and thus shalt thou be strengthened to pursue it unto the attainment of the Stone of the Wise, the summum bonum, True Wisdom and Perfect Happiness.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1947, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 76 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Love's Usury

FOR every hour that thou wilt spare me now, I will allow, Usurious god of love, twenty to thee, When with my brown my gray hairs equal be. Till then, Love, let my body range, and let Me travel, sojourn, snatch, plot, have, forget, Resume my last year's relict; think that yet We'd never met.
Let me think any rival's letter mine, And at next nine Keep midnight's promise; mistake by the way The maid, and tell the lady of that delay; Only let me love none; no, not the sport From country grass to confitures of court, Or city's quelque-choses; let not report My mind transport.
This bargain's good; if when I'm old, I be Inflamed by thee, If thine own honour, or my shame and pain, Thou covet most, at that age thou shalt gain. Do thy will then; then subject and degree And fruit of love, Love, I submit to thee. Spare me till then; I'll bear it, though she be One that love me.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Love's Trilogy

Layout 2
LOVE'S TRILOGY
Julie's Diary, Marie, God's Peace
FROM THE DANISH OF
PETER NANSEN
BY
JULIA LE GALLIENNE
BOSTON JOHN W. LUCE AND COMPANY 1908
PRINTED IN ENGLAND
CONTENTS
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1942, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 81 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Love's mystery

COPYRIGHT, 1888.
D R. Niver Pub. Co.
"It was Mary Magdalene, and Joanna, and Mary the mother of James, and other women that were with them, which told these things."
THEY trusted it was He who should redeem
His people from their bondage, yet they saw
Him bound by cruel foes. What could it mean?
And they believed, if He but prayed, that more
Than hosts of shining angels would attend;
Yet all alone He neared the dreadful end.
"I am the Life," the gracious words He said.
Can it be possible the Life is dead?
Now that they do not understand, yet love
Is stronger for its trial, and they seek,
As soon as morning dawns, that love to prove,
By bearing spices to anoint their dead.
In the new tomb, in Joseph's garden laid.
They do not dream what love's reward shall be,
Nor think that they a risen Lord shall see.
​BUT LO! an angel at the break of day,
Had rolled away the great stone from the door:
And Christ had burst the bands of death away.
Behold He is alive for evermore!
And to the wondering women angels said.
Why seek the living here among the dead?
Then, even while they wonder at the words,
Turning about, their eyes behold their Lord!
​SOUL, learn thy lesson well: God's ways are deep.
Past comprehension, full of mystery;
Yet all His unknown providences keep
This one sweet thought, His wondrous love for thee.
Let hope be strong, and let love keep thee near.
And when thou thinkest not He shall appear!
Then, in His presence, thou shalt fully prove
The mysteries of everlasting love.
Beulah.
# Love's stricken "why"

Love's stricken "why" Is all that love can speak — Built of but just a syllable The hugest hearts that break.
# Love, Dost Thou Smile?

"Love, dost thou smile, believing thou shalt cheat"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1905), "Love, Dost Thou Smile?" in Harper's Monthly Magazine (October 1905).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1909), "Love, Dost Thou Smile?" in Lyrics of Life (1909).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "Love, Dost Thou Smile?" in Poems II.

## References

* ↑ View this version at Google Books.
# Love, Reproachful

"Then Love, reproachful, sighed: 'Art thou become'"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1904), "Love, Reproachful" in Mine and Thine (1904).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "Love Reproachful" in Poems II.
# Love's Wisdom

Now on the summit of Love's topmost peak Kiss we and part; no further can we go: And better death than we from high to low Should dwindle or decline from strong to weak. We have found all, there is no more to seek; All have we proved, no more is there to know; And time could only tutor us to eke Out rapture's warmth with custom's afterglow. We cannot keep at such a height as this; For even straining souls like ours inhale But once in life so rarefied a bliss. What if we lingered till love's breath should fail! Heaven of my Earth! one more celestial kiss, Then down by separate pathways to the vale.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Madame de Treymes

one or more chapters are available in a spoken word format.
MADAME DE TREYMES
BY
EDITH WHARTON
WITH ILLUSTRATIONS
NEW YORK
CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS
1907
She was simply one particular facet of the solid, glittering impenetrable body (Page 60)
* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
* Chapter VII
* Chapter VIII
* Chapter IX
* Chapter X
COPYRIGHT, 1906, 1907, BY CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS
PUBLISHED FEBRUARY, 1907
D. B. UPDIKE, THE MERRYMOUNT PRESS, BOSTON
BOOKS BY EDITH WHARTON
PUBLISHED BY CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS
The House of Mirth. Illustrated $1.50
The Descent of Man 1.50
Sanctuary. Illustrated 1.25
The Valley of Decision 1.50
Crucial Instances 1.50
The Touchstone 1.25
The Greater Inclination 1.50
Italian Backgrounds. Illustrated net 2.50
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1937, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 86 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lordi v. Epstein

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 29
Lordi v. Epstein
Arthur J. Sills, Atty. Gen. of New Jersey, and Joseph A. Hoffman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Charles H. Tuttle, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lordi v. Epstein/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 29
Lordi v. Epstein
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Cf. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U.S. 324, 84 S.Ct. 1293, 12 L.Ed.2d 350.
Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice HARLAN would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Liggett Myers Tobacco Company v. United States (274 U.S. 215)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
274 U.S. 215
Liggett Myers Tobacco Company v. United States
Argued: March 3, 1927. --- Decided: May 2, 1927
Mr. Chester A. Gwinn, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from page 216 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Herman J. Galloway, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from page 217 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Light-hearted, thoughtless, shall I take my way

* "Light-hearted, thoughtless, shall I take my way" in Autumn: From the Journal of Henry D. Thoreau (1892)
* As "Farewell" in The Writings of Henry David Thoreau (1906) Vol. 7
# Light after Darkness

"Once more the Night, like some great dark drop-scene"
* "Light after Darkness" in The Muse in Arms (1917)
* "Light after Darkness" in A treasury of war poetry, British and American poems of the world war, 1914-1919 (1917)
# Liggett Myers Tobacco Company v. United States (299 U.S. 383)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
299 U.S. 383
Liggett Myers Tobacco Company v. United States
Argued: Dec. 11-14, 1936. ---
Mr. Henry F. Long, of Boston, Mass., for petitioners.
Mr. J. P. Jackson, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Light (Bourdillon)

The Night has a thousand eyes, And the Day but one; Yet the light of the bright world dies With the dying sun.
The mind has a thousand eyes, And the heart but one; Yet the light of a whole life dies When love is done.
# Light Locomotives (Ireland) Bill

* related portals: Parliament of the United Kingdom.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Act of Parliament passed to allow the running of the 1903 Gordon Bennett Cup motor race by allowing public roads in Ireland (then a part of the United Kingdom) to be closed to regular traffic, and for laws regarding speed limits and furious driving not to apply to drivers taking part in a race.
A
B I L L
TO
A.D. 1903. —— Provide for the Authorisation of Races with Light Locomotives in Ireland.
BE it enacted by the King’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:——
Authorisation of races with light locomotives.1.—(1) The Council of any administrative county may, on the application of any persons or club by order declare that any roads
within the county may be used for races with light locomotives during the whole or part of any days specified in order, not exceeding three days in the year.
    (2) The order may contain such provisions as the county council may think fit for the temporary suspension and regulation of other traffic for the safety of the public, for the restriction of speed in populous places, and for other purposes incident to the proper conduct of such races.
    (3) Public notice shall be given of the provisions of the order by placards on the roads so authorised to be used.
    (4) No provisions of any Act, byelaw, or regulation, restricting the speed of locomotives or imposing any penalty for furious driving shall apply to any light locomotive, or the driver thereof, engaged in such races save so far as the same may be incorporated with the order.
Expenses of the county council.2. The expenses incurred by a county council in carrying any order under this Act into effect shall be defrayed by the applicants, and the county council may before granting the order require the applicants to make such deposit as may in their opinion be necessary to defray such expenses.
​Definition.3. In this Act the expression "light locomotives" shall have the same meaning as in the Locomotives on Highways Act, 1896, and all other expressions shall have the same meaning as in the Local Government (Ireland) Act, 1898.
Extent and citation.4.—(1) This Act shall extend to Ireland only and may be cited as the Light Locomotives (Ireland) Act, 1903.
    (2.) This Act shall only remain in force until the thirty-first day of December one thousand nine hundred and three.
This work is in the public domain worldwide because it is a Bill or proposed Measure of one of the following legislatures in the United Kingdom and was either granted Royal Assent or is otherwise no longer proceeding through the legislative process:
* Parliament of the United Kingdom
* Scottish Parliament
* Senedd Cymru (formerly known as the National Assembly for Wales)
* Northern Ireland Assembly
See sections 166, 166A, 166B, 166C and 166D of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Light's Decalogue

This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
March 1899
He is atheist who serves
God that falters, Truth that swerves.
Graven images they make
Who their idols do not break.
They keep holy sabbath days
Only who are right always.
Honor to their parents give
They who teach a child to live.
They are murderers who will
In the cause of life not kill,
And a loveless marriage is
Greatest of adulteries.
He’s a thief who does not dare
Tale what tyrants ought to spare,
And false witness who’d deny
Truth the weapons of the lie,
While they covet not who are
In the dark, yet grasp the star.
# McMahon v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
342 U.S. 25
McMahon v. United States
Argued: Oct. 17, 1951. --- Decided: Nov 5, 1951
See 342 U.S. 899, 72 S.Ct. 228.
Mr. Paul M. Goldstein, for Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.
Mr. Leavenworth Colby, Washington, D.C., for respondents.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McMann v. Ross

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 118
McMann v. Ross
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lillion Z. Cohen and Brenda Soloff, Asst. Attys. Gen., for petitioners.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McLoughlin v. Raphael Tuck & Sons Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
191 U.S. 267
McLoughlin v. Raphael Tuck & Sons Company
Argued: November 11, 12, 1903. --- Decided: November 30, 1903
Mr. A. Bell Malcomson for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Harold Binney, Louis C. Raegener, and S. L. Moody for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McMann v. Richardson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Brennan
United States Supreme Court
397 U.S. 759
McMann v. Richardson
Argued: Feb. 24, 1970. --- Decided: May 4, 1970
Brenda Soloff, New York City, for petitioners.
Michael R. Juviler, New York City, for the District Attorney of New York County, as amicus curiae, by special leave of Court.
Gretchen White Oberman, New York City, for respondents.
Mr. Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McMicken v. Perin (61 U.S. 133)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
61 U.S. 133
McMicken v. Perin
THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana.
It was before this court at a preceding term, and is reported in 18th Howard, 508.
When the mandate of this court went down, the money therein mentioned was tendered to McMicken, who refused to accept it; whereupon, an order was obtained to attach him for contempt, in refusing to make the conveyance required by the decree. Whilst in custody of the marshal, he executed the conveyance, and at the same time took an appeal from the order to attach.
Mr. Taylor moved to dismiss the appeal, which motion was opposed by Mr. Gillet.
Mr. Taylor referred to the cases of Watson v. Thomas, Littell's Select Cases, (6 Lit.,) 248; Carr v. Hoxie, 13 Pet., 462; and Lovelace v. Taylor, 6 Rob. R., 93.
Mr. Justice McLEAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McMicken v. Carey

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
65 U.S. 465
McMicken v. Carey

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McMicken v. Perin (59 U.S. 507)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
59 U.S. 507
McMicken v. Perin
This was an appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana.
The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
It was argued by Mr. Henderson, for the appellant, and Mr. Smiley, for the appellee.
Mr. Henderson made the following points:--
1. That the decree validates a void purchase of a litigious right.
2. That the complainant's alleged title was void by the Louisiana statute of champerty.
3. That no loan of money and no resulting trust is shown.
4. There is no express trust in writing shown, though such trust is averred.
5. That the amount admitted by the bill and exhibits to be due to the defendant on the purchase was not allowed him in the decree.
6. That Mary Perin was not made a party to the bill, though her interest in one half of the property in controversy was shown.
Mr. Justice CAMPBELL delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McMicken's Executors v. Perin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
63 U.S. 282
McMicken's Executors v. Perin
THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana.
The case was twice before this court, and is reported in 18 Howard, 507, and 20 Howard, 133.
The facts of the present case are stated in the opinion of the court.
It was submitted on printed briefs by Mr. Benjamin for the appellants, and by Mr. Day and Mr. Perin for the appellee.
Mr. Benjamin said:
The appellant has died since taking his appeal, and the executors who represent him in this cause have not deemed themselves authorized to abandon the appeal, but have instructed the undersigned to submit it for the decision of the court.
The undersigned counsel therefore respectfully submits the cause for decision, but, on examination of the record, does not deem it his duty to attempt by argument to show the existence of any error in the decree appealed from, confident that if such exist, it will be corrected by the decision of this court.
The arguments on behalf of the appellee need not be reported.
Mr. Justice NELSON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McMicken v. Perin

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "McMicken v. Perin."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* McMicken v. Perin (59 U.S. 507)
* McMicken v. Perin (61 U.S. 133)
# McNerlin v. Denno

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
378 U.S. 575
McNerlin v. Denno
Richard J. Medalie, for petitioner.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, first Asst. Atty. Gen., and Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse