OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# An Examen of Witches/Chapter 2

Layout 2
Chapter II.
The Means by which the Truth was drawn from Françoise Secretain.
For three days of her imprisonment Françoise Secretain refused to confess anything, saying that she was innocent of the crime of which she was accused and that they did her great wrong to detain her. To look at her, you would have thought she was the best woman in the world; for she was always talking of God, of the Virgin Mary, and of the Holy Saints of Paradise, and she had in her hand a long rosary which she pretended to say without interruption. But the truth is that the Cross of this rosary was defective, and it will be seen that this fact furnished evidence against her.
Further, it was observed that during her examination, although she strove her utmost to do so, she could not shed a single tear. For this reason she was more closely imprisoned, and certain threats were used to her. The following day she was pressed to tell the truth, but without success. Accordingly it was decided to shave off her hair and change her garments, and to search her to see if she were marked in any way. She was therefore stripped, but no mark was found; and when they came to cut the hair of her head she submitted with the utmost confidence. But no sooner was her hair cut than she grew perturbed and trembled all over her body, and at once confessed, adding to her first ​confessions from day to day. I shall set down only the principal points of her confession, following my undertaking to be brief.
# An Examen of Witches/Chapter 3

Layout 2
Chapter III.
The Principal Points in the Confession of Françoise Secretain.
First, that she had wished five devils on Loyse Maillat.
Second, that she had long since given herself to the Devil, who at that time had the likeness of a big black man.
Third, that the Devil had four or five times known her carnally, in the form sometimes of a dog, sometimes of a cat, and sometimes of a fowl; and that his semen was very cold.
Fourth, that she had countless times been to the Sabbat and assembly of witches near the village of Coyrieres in a place called Combes by the water; and that she went there on a white staff which she placed between her legs.
Fifth, that at the Sabbat she had danced, and had beaten water to cause hail.
Sixth, that she and Groz-Jacques Bocquet had caused Loys Monneret to die by making her eat a piece of bread which they had dusted with a powder given to them by the Devil.
Seventh, that she had caused several cows to die, and that she did so by touching them with her hand or with a wand while saying certain words.
# An Examen of Witches/Chapter 6

Layout 2
Chapter VI.
Whether One Witch can Harm Another.
We have said that Groz-Jacques sent two devils into the body of the witch Rollande; and out of this arises the question whether one witch can harm another, to which I propose to devote a few words. It appears that the answer must be in the affirmative for several reasons, chiefly because, just as there are grades in the angelic Hierarchy, so among devils there is a sort ​of disordered order, which I would rather call a Cacarchy, whereby some are more potent than others. v. Peter Lombard, Sent. II., distinc. 6. Thyr. Job 41. Matth. 12. Mark 5. Luke 11. Matth. 12.This may be verified by several passages of Holy Scripture; for in Job, speaking of Behemoth, it is said; “He is a king over all the children of pride.” And in another place Beelzebub is called the Prince of the Devils; for the Jews reproached Jesus Christ because he cast out devils by Beelzebub the Prince of the Devils. But, more than this, our Lord clearly shows in St. Matthew that all devils have not the same power or might, in these words: “If Satan cast out Satan, he is divided against himself.”
v. Flagell. Dæmon. Docum., 4.Our exorcists are well aware of this; for they sometimes command Lucifer and the other more potent devils to torment those which are inferior to them, when the latter prove stubborn in refusing to come out of the bodies of those whom they have possessed.
St. August., Cass., St. Thomas., Perer., Binsfeld. de confession. malefic., dub. princip., conclusio 10.If, then, it be true that one devil is more potent than another, as we have just shown, and as the Theologians are agreed, it follows that it will be easy for one witch to harm another, provided that he has control over a more powerful devil than that other; for a witch’s power is governed by that of the devil which is his familiar.
Let us take some examples to confirm this statement. Mall. Malefic. II. 2.Sprenger tells that an old witch caused a younger witch to die, that she might heal a Bishop who had been stricken sick by the young witch. Formic. 3.Nider writes that in Germany when a man is bewitched, he goes to an old witch, who pours molten lead into water until, with the help of the Devil, an image is formed of the lead; on which the old woman asks the sick man in which part of the body he wishes her to torture the ​witch who has cast the spell on him; and if he agrees to her harming the witch, she takes a knife and strikes the image with it; and at the same instant the witch receives as many blows as were given to the image. I remember also that, when Antoine Tornier was confronted with Jaquema Paget, Jaquema accused her of having threatened her several times, and even of having often said that she would prevent her cows from yielding milk, although her own cows should yield abundantly. In this manner, therefore, it appears that one witch can harm another.
# The Art of Preserving Health - A Poem in Four Books

THE
ART
OF PRESERVING
HEALTH:
A.
POEM.
LONDON:
Printed for A. Millar, opposite to Katharine-Street in the Strand.
MDCCXLIV.
[Price Four Shillings sewed.]
* Air
* Diet
* Exercise
* The Passions
This work was published before January 1, 1930, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chicago Tribune/1938/01/25/Jensen

Lena Olsen (1861-1930) funeral notice in the Chicago Tribune on January 25, 1938. She was born as "Hanne Eline Olsdatter".
Jensen — Lena Jensen of 48 North Menard avenue and Williams Bay, Wisconsin, January 23, 1938, wife of the late Andrew Jensen, fond mother of Mrs. Mary Marie Hemwall, Mrs. Dolly Gogerty, Mrs. Daisy Woods, Mrs. Goldie Holm, Mrs. Eleanor Shanahan, Leif, Leonard, Alvin Jensen, and the late Mrs. Thea Caro; twenty-two grandchildren and two great-grandchildren. Resting at funeral home, 318-320 N. Central avenue, Austin, until Wednesday noon. Funeral Wednesday, 2 p.m., at Moreland Lutheran church, corner Lotus avenue and Huron street. Interment Mount Olive.
This work is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# The Philadelphia Inquirer/1907/Trying to Find Mother

* related portals: Blanche Kingsmore
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, quotes, Wikidata item
Blanche Kingsmore in the Philadelphia Inquirer on October 24, 1907
Trying to Find Mother
After endeavoring through every available channel to learn the whereabouts of his mother, from whom he has been separated for fifteen years, John J. Patterson, 22 years, of 117 North Tenth street, has asked The Inquirer to try, through its columns, to locate the missing parent. Mother and son became separated in New York city in 1892 as the result of a family quarrel. Since that time the young man has been trying to find his mother and thereby reestablish the old home. Mrs. Patterson would now be forty years of age. Her maiden name was Blanche Kingsmore.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1930.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chicago Tribune/1936/04/26/Olson

Hannah Amundsen (1864-1936) funeral notice in the Chicago Tribune on April 26, 1936.
Olson — Hannah Olson, nee Amundsen, wife of the late Otto, beloved mother of the late Mrs. Tillie Wintrone, Harry, Mrs. Mabel Clay, Norman, Helen, and Hazel Wintrone. Funeral services Monday, 1 p.m., at chapel, 2906 Madison-street. Interment Mount Olive.
This work is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rope (US 1929)/Act II

Layout 2
ACT II
The Scene is the same as before, and no time has elapsed.
Brandon (in same attitude). Talk about rotting bones in chests, Rupert?
Rupert. Yes.
Brandon. What about them? (Turns round and begins poking fire again.)
Rupert. Do you remember when you were an infant, Brandon?
Brandon. M’m . . . (Finishes poking fire, puts poker back and commences to wipe his hands on his handkerchief.)
Rupert. And how you used to tell me stories round the fire?
Brandon. Yes. Rather. I remember.
Rupert. Do you remember your chest complex, Brandon?
Brandon. My chest complex?
Rupert. Yes. Whatever the story was—piratical, dective, murder, adventure or ghost—it always con- ed a marvellous dénouement with a bloody chest containing corpses. You had a perfect mania for it, don’t you remember?
Brandon (suddenly a trifle serious, forgetting himself). Yes, I’d forgotten that.
Rupert (looking at him. Pause). Why should you have remembered it?
Brandon (putting handkerchief away and walking over to sideboard for whisky). Yes, it’s quite true. I remember now. What about it, though?
Rupert (lightly). Oh, nothing. Just queer, that’s all. You were a morbid child.
​Page:Rope.pdf/44 ​Page:Rope.pdf/45 ​Page:Rope.pdf/46 ​Page:Rope.pdf/47 ​Page:Rope.pdf/48 ​Page:Rope.pdf/49 ​Page:Rope.pdf/50 ​Page:Rope.pdf/51 ​Page:Rope.pdf/52 ​Page:Rope.pdf/53 ​Page:Rope.pdf/54 ​Page:Rope.pdf/55 ​Page:Rope.pdf/56 ​Page:Rope.pdf/57 ​Page:Rope.pdf/58 ​Page:Rope.pdf/59 ​Page:Rope.pdf/60 ​Page:Rope.pdf/61 ​Page:Rope.pdf/62 ​Page:Rope.pdf/63 ​Page:Rope.pdf/64 ​Page:Rope.pdf/65 ​Page:Rope.pdf/66 ​Page:Rope.pdf/67 ​Page:Rope.pdf/68
# Robinson v. Neil
## Separate Opinion

    Brennan
Supreme Court of the United States
409 U.S. 505
Robinson v. Neil, Warden
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
No. 71-6272. Argued: December 6, 1972 --- Decided: January 16, 1973
Waller v. Florida, 397 U.S. 387, which bars on the ground of double jeopardy two prosecutions, state and municipal, based on the same act or offense, is fully retroactive. Pp. 506-511.
452 F.2d 370, vacated and remanded.
REHNQUIST, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. BRENNAN, J., filed a separate opinion, in which DOUGLAS and MARSHALL, JJ., joined, post, p. 511.
James D. Robinson argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Jerry H. Summers.
Bart C. Durham III, Assistant Attorney General of Tennessee, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were David M. Pack, Attorney General, and William C. Koch, Jr., Assistant Attorney General.
# Constitution of Georgia

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Constitution of Georgia"
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
   * Constitution of Georgia (1921)
   * Constitution of Georgia (1995)
   * Constitution of Georgia (2018)
   * Charter of Georgia
   * Georgia State Constitution (1777)
   * Georgia State Constitution (1789)
   * Georgia State Constitution (1798)
   * Georgia State Constitution (1976)
# Practical Pointers for Shorthand Students

Layout 2
(Upload an image to replace this placeholder.)
PRACTICAL POINTERS
for
SHORTHAND STUDENTS
by
FRANK RUTHERFORD
CHICAGO Gregg Publishing Company 1904
Copyright, 1904 by JOHN R. GREGG
The Publishers' Foreword
We hope and believe that this book will prove of value to every ambitious student into whose hands it may come. It would be difficult to find anyone better qualified than the author to write a book of this kind. Mr. Rutherford can speak of almost every phase of shorthand and typewriting work from actual experience, for he has been a stenographer, a private secretary, a reporter, a teacher of shorthand, and an exponent of modern methods of typewriting. This broad, comprehensive experience has enabled him to write a book full of practical, up-to-date suggestions.
In speaking of Mr. Rutherford as a teacher, the Typewriter and Phonographic World said: "He is one of the very few teachers whom we know that every pupil he ever had recommends unqualifiedly and always mentions in terms of unstinted praise. He is a careful and painstaking teacher and conscientious, tireless worker."
This book was written by Mr. Rutherford in his leisure moments, as opportunity offered, and the copy sent to us from time to time. We desire to express our indebtedness to Miss Alice G. Rosenfels and Mr. Rupert P. SoRelle for their valued assistance in arranging and editing the manuscript.
The Gregg Publishing Company.
Chicago, February, 1904.
[Advertisements]
GREGG SHORTHAND PUBLICATIONS
THE GREGG PUBLISHING COMPANY CHICAGO
CONTENTS
This work was published before January 1, 1930, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Robinson v. Neil/Separate Brennan

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Separate Opinion Brennan
[p511] MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, with whom MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL concur.
Although I otherwise join the opinion of the Court, I would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals outright. I adhere to my view that, regardless of the similarity of the offenses, the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment, which is applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784 (1969), requires the prosecution, except in most limited circumstances not present here, "to join at one trial all the charges against a defendant that grow out of a single criminal act, occurrence, episode, or transaction." Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 453-454 (1970) (BRENNAN, J., concurring); see Grubb v. Oklahoma, post, p. 1017 (1972) (BRENNAN, J., dissenting); Miller v. Oregon, 405 U.S. 1047 (1972) (BRENNAN, J., dissenting); Harris v. Washington, 404 U.S. 55, 57 (1971) (separate statement of DOUGLAS, BRENNAN, and MARSHALL, JJ.). Under this "same transaction" test, all charges against petitioner should have been brought in a single prosecution.
# Sarah Frances Mudd’s June 16, 1865 Affidavit

* related portals: Samuel Mudd Documents
* sister projects: Wikidata item
The law at the time of the Lincoln conspiracy trial prohibited a wife from testifying in her husband’s behalf. Anticipating an unfavorable outcome of the trial, Dr. Mudd’s attorney, General Thomas Ewing, had Mrs. Mudd prepare an affidavit describing Booth’s visit to the Mudd farm. When Dr. Mudd’s guilty verdict was announced, Ewing submitted the affidavit, dated June 16, 1865, directly to President Johnson in a long shot hope that Johnson would abrogate the verdict. Johnson didn’t do that, and Dr. Mudd was sent to prison.
Three weeks after her June 16th affidavit, Mrs. Mudd prepared a second affidavit, dated July 6, 1865, which expanded upon her first affidavit.
Source: Thomas Ewing Papers, Library of Congress
I, Sarah F. Mudd, wife of Dr. Samuel A. Mudd, do hereby certify that when my husband returned from Bryantown on Saturday evening the 15th of April, the two men since ascertained to be Booth and Harald, were leaving the house.
I was standing in the passage when they came downstairs and noticed that the whiskers of the lame man were false from their becoming partially detached on one side. And that about night Dr. and I were speaking about those men, I then told him about the whiskers becoming detached. He then told me he did not like the actions of those men who had been at the house, that the lame man had shaved off his moustache and they both seemed to be under more excitement than the breaking of a leg would cause. He then remarked he would return immediately to Bryantown and give this information to the authorities of the fact of those parties having been there. I became alarmed and earnestly entreated him not to go. I recalled the fate of Capt. Watkins and reminded him of the report that Boyle and his associates were infesting the neighborhood and begged him not to expose his life by openly giving information on the parties who had left his house. He warned me of the danger he would be incurring by deferring to give the information. I told him it would be as well to wait until morning as it was then quite dark and give the information indirectly. I suggested to him to tell Dr. Mudd or someone living in the village of Bryantown and let them tell the authorities. He seemed unwilling to yield but finally gave up to my fears and entreaties.
I know that my husband had no knowledge or suspicion that the man with a broken leg was Booth until after the man had gone, that since his arrest I have never ceased to regret my interposing in his purpose of that evening and have openly blamed myself as the cause of his trouble. He has suffered on account of not having given immediate information and that I dissuaded him from giving information purely in consideration of his personal danger and in the belief, it would be as well to get someone to do it for him.
Sarah F. Mudd
This work was published before January 1, 1930, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Goosby v. Osser

Supreme Court of the United States
409 U.S. 512
Goosby et al. v. Osser et al.
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
No. 71-6316. Argued: December 6-7, 1972 --- Decided: January 17, 1973
Philadelphia County prisoners unable to make bail or being held on nonbailable offenses brought this class action, asserting the unconstitutionality of Pennsylvania Election Code provisions denying them the right to vote. When the Commonwealth (but not the municipal) officials who were named as defendants conceded the Code provisions' unconstitutionality, the District Judge (deeming the Commonwealth officials the principal defendants) ruled the case nonjusticiable as not involving an Art. III case or controversy, and dismissed the complaint. The Court of Appeals, though differing as to justiciability, affirmed on the ground that petitioners' constitutional claims were wholly insubstantial under McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs, 394 U.S. 802, and ruled that a three-judge district court was therefore not required under 28 U.S.C. § 2281.
Held:
    1. The Commonwealth officials' concession did not foreclose the existence of an Art. III case or controversy since the municipal officials continue to assert the right to enforce the challenged Code provisions. Pp. 516-517.
    2. McDonald, supra, unlike the situation alleged here, did not deal with an absolute prohibition against voters by the prisoners there involved, and that decision does not "foreclose the subject" of petitioners' challenge to the Pennsylvania statutory scheme. The case may, if appropriate, therefore be heard by a three-judge district curt. Pp. 518-523.
452 F.2d 39, reversed and remanded.
BRENNAN, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Ann S. Torregrossa argued the cause for petitioners pro hac vice. With her on the briefs was Elliot B. Platt.
Peter W. Brown, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al. With him on the brief were J. Shane Creamer, Attorney General, and Thomas J. Oravetz and Edward J. Weintraub, Deputy Attorneys General. John Mattioni argued the cause and filed a brief for municipal respondents.
Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed by Jack Greenberg and Stanley A. Bass for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., et al., and by Samuel Rabinove, Michael von Moschzisker, Wilbur Bourne Ruthrauff, A. Harry Levitan, and Carolyn Temin for the American Jewish Committee et al.
# 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Pinnock, William

See also William Pinnock on Wikipedia; and our 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica disclaimer.
​PINNOCK, WILLIAM (1782–1843), English publisher and educational writer, was born at Alton, Hampshire, on the 3rd of February 1782, and was at first a schoolmaster, then a bookseller. In 1817 he went to London and, in partnership with Samuel Mander, began to publish cheap educational works. The firm’s first productions were a series of Catechisms, planned by Pinnock, consisting of short popular manuals, arranged in the form of question and answer, of the different departments of knowledge. They were followed by abridged editions of Goldsmith’s histories of England, Greece and Rome, and a series of county histories which were no less profitable. Pinnock lost nearly all his money in outside speculation, and died in London on the 21st of October 1843. His son, William Henry Pinnock (1813–1885), a clergyman, was the editor and author of several elementary textbooks and scriptural manuals, and of various works on ecclesiastical law and usage.
# Asbury Park Press/1926/Two States Watch For a Murderer

Felix Szczesny (1888-1926) in Asbury Park Press on October 11, 1926.
Two States Watch For a Murderer
Jersey City, New Jersey; October 11, 1926. (Associated Press) While detectives kept vigil today at a certain room in a sordid section of Brooklyn, New York, hoping a murderer would come home, Hudson county was also scoured for "Joe," sometimes known as "Tony." Joe stabbed Felix Szczesny fatally last night and then plunged his knife into Andrew Zuilkowski. Whereupon he fled, and the few frightened men and women police questioned could not even give his full name. The three men drank together in a Steuben street speakeasy. Joe refused to pay for his "round," police were informed. Mrs. Sophia Rodztewlcz, tending bar threw them out. Then the stabbing took place. Felix lived nine hours, Andrew probably will recover. Police raided the place a few hours later and arrested Sophia's husband, John, on a charge of selling liquor. They also seized a varied assortment of the beverages the men had been quaffing.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works could have had their copyright renewed between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st of the 29th year.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# The Linnet (1819, Falkirk)/The Sorrowful Mother

The Sorrowful Mother.