OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Mother Goose for Grownups/The Quixotic Quest of Three Blind Mice

This poem was published in Carryl’s 1900 anthology Mother Goose for Grownups, of poems that are parodies of Mother Goose nursery rhymes.
A maiden mouse of an arrogant mind Had three little swains and all were blind. The reason for this I do not know, But I think it was love that made them so, For without demur they bowed to her, Though she treated them all with a high hauteur. She ruled them, schooled them, frequently fooled them, Snubbed, tormented, and ridiculed them: Mice as a rule are much like men, So they swallowed their pride and called again.
The maiden mouse of an arrogant mind To morbid romance was much inclined. The reason for this I have not learned, But I think by novels her head was turned. She said that the chap who dared to nap One hour inside of the farmer’s trap Might gain her, reign her, wholly enchain her, Woo her, win her, and thence retain her! Hope ran high in each suitor’s breast, And all determined to stand the test.
The maiden mouse of an arrogant mind Laughed when she saw them thus confined. The reason for this I can’t proclaim, But I know some girls who’d have done the same! As thus they kept to their word, and slept, The farmer’s wife to the pantry stept: She sought them, caught them, carefully brought them Out to the light, and there she taught them How that chivalry often fails, By calmly cutting off all their tails!
The maiden mouse of an arrogant mind Treated her swains in a way unkind. The reason for this is not complex: That’s always the way with the tender sex. With impudent hails she cried: “What ails You all, and where are your splendid tails?” She jeered so, sneered so, flouted and fleered so, Giggled, and altogether appeared so Lacking in heart, that her slaves grew bored, And threw up the sponge of their own accord.
The maiden mouse of an arrogant mind Watched and waited, and peaked and pined. The reason for this, I beg to state, Is summed up in the words Too Late! The moral intwined is: Love is blind, But he never leaves all his wits behind, You may beat him, cheat him, often defeat him, Though he be true with torture treat him: One of these days you’ll be bereft, You think you’re right, but you’ll find you’re left.
# National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
308 U.S. 413
National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Argued: Dec. 8, 1939. --- Decided: Jan 2, 1940
Messrs. Frank Murphy, Atty. Gen., and Charles Fahy, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Messrs. Taft, Slettinius & Hollister, and John B. Hollister, all of Cincinnati, Ohio, and Isaac Lobe Straus, and Sigmund Levin, both of Baltimore, Md., for respondents.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Labor Relations Board v. Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America/Concurrence Harlan

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Harlan
United States Supreme Court
391 U.S. 418
National Labor Relations Board v. Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America
Argued: April 30, 1968. --- Decided: May 27, 1968
Mr. Justice HARLAN, concurring.
I am persuaded by the legislative history, summarized in part by the Court, that the proviso to § 101(a)(4) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, 29 U.S.C. § 411(a)(4), was intended simply to permit a court or agency to require a union member to exhaust internal union remedies of less than four months' duration before invoking outside assistance. See generally Detroy v. American Guild of Variety Artists, 2 Cir., 286 F.2d 75, 78. I cannot, however, agree that a union may punish a member for his invocation of his remedies before a court or agency 'where the complaint or grievance * * * concern(s) an internal union matter,' and thus does not touch any 'part of the public domain covered by the Act * * *.' Ante, at 428. Assuming arguendo that there are member-union grievances untouched by the various federal labor statutes, this dichotomy has, it seems to me, precisely the disadvantage that the Court has found in the Third Circuit's construction of the proviso: it compels a member to gamble his union membership, and often his employment, on the accuracy of his understanding of the federal labor laws.
Finally, it is appropriate to emphasize that courts and agencies will frustrate an important purpose of the 1959 legislation if they do not, in fact, regularly compel union members 'to exhaust reasonable hearing procedures' within the union organization. Responsible union self-government demands, among other prerequisites, a fair opportunity to function. See Detroy v. American Guild of Variety Artists, supra, at 79.
With these modifications, I concur in the opinion and judgment of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Labor Relations Board v. Insurance Agents' International Union

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
361 U.S. 477
National Labor Relations Board v. Insurance Agents' International Union
Argued: Dec. 7, 8, 1959. --- Decided: Feb 23, 1960
Mr. Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Isaac N. Groner, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Labor Relations Board v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
318 U.S. 9
National Labor Relations Board v. Indiana & Michigan Electric Company
Argued: Nov. 13-16, 1942. --- Decided: Jan 18, 1943
Mr. Ernest A. Gross, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Messrs. Eli F. Seebirt, of South Bend, Ind., and Murray Seasongood, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondents.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Anthem of the Soviet Union

* related portals: National anthems.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, quotes, Wikidata item.
The National Anthem of the Soviet Union (or Hymn, Russian: Гимн Советского Союза, Gimn Sovetskogo Soyuza) replaced the Internationale as the national anthem on March 15, 1944. The lyrics were written by Sergey Mikhalkov (born 1913) in collaboration with G. El-Registan (1899-1945) and the music was composed by Alexander Alexandrov (1883-1946). It was believed that Soviet soldiers would respond more to an anthem that was dedicated only to the Soviet Union rather than to a worldwide movement.Warning: template has been deprecated.
See also Hymn of the Soviet Union on Multilingual Wikisource.
English-language translations of Государственный гимн СССР include:
* State Anthem of the Soviet Union, 1977 version, free translation by Wikisource
* State Anthem of the Soviet Union, 1977 version, literal translation by Wikisource
* State Anthem of the Soviet Union, 1977 version, alternate translation by Wikisource
# National Anthem of South Africa

This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
* related portals: National anthems, South Africa.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
The following is the English version of the South African national anthem that was used during the apartheid years in South Africa. It is essentially a translation of the Afrikaans anthem, Die Stem.

## The Call of South Africa

   Ringing out from our blue heavens, from our deep seas breaking round; Over everlasting mountains where the echoing crags resound; From our plains where creaking wagons cut their trails into the earth— Calls the spirit of our Country, of the land that gave us birth.
   At thy call we shall not falter, firm and steadfast we shall stand, At thy will to live or perish, O South Africa, dear land.
   In our body and our spirit, in our inmost heart held fast; in the promise of our future and the glory of our past; In our will, our work, our striving, from the cradle to the grave— There's no land that shares our loving, and no bond that can enslave.
   Thou hast borne us and we know thee. May our deeds to all proclaim Our enduring love and service to thy honour and thy name.
   In the golden warmth of summer, in the chill of winter's air, in the surging life of springtime, in the autumn of despair; When the wedding bells are chiming or when those we love do depart; Thou dost know us for thy children and dost take us to thy heart.
   Loudly peals the answering chorus; We are thine, and we shall stand, Be it life or death, to answer to thy call, beloved land.
   In thy power, Almighty, trusting, did our fathers build of old; Strengthen then, O Lord, their children to defend, to love, to hold— That the heritage they gave us for our children yet may be; Bondsmen only of the Highest and before the whole world free.
   As our fathers trusted humbly, teach us, Lord, to trust Thee still; Guard our land and guide our people in Thy way to do Thy will.
# National Anthem of Zimbabwe

This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Anthem of the Sakha Republic

* information about this edition.
* related portals: National anthems.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
The National Anthem of the Sakha Republic or National Anthem of Yakutia is the regional national anthem of the Sakha Republic, a federal subject of Russia. It was originally written in the Sakha language by Savva Tarasov and later translated into Russian by Michael Timofeyev. The music was composed by Kirill Gerasimov. The anthem was officially adopted on 15 July 2004.Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Translation of original lyrics in English (unofficial)

Yakutia, thou art the light of the dawn! To goodness and happiness thou callest us. Thou shinest bright as a rainbow of diamond And lead us on to future victory
Chorus: Shine and grow stronger, native land! Grow and exult, Yakutia! Thou art the beauty and pride of all Russia Thou art free, and liberal in thy gifts.
Freely our Lena flows with living water to thy wide borders. It carries harmony and strength. It grants all peoples peace.
Chorus
Land of Sakha, thy sacred places From peaks of ages direct us. We continue the journey of our ancestors and with honour fulfil their mandate.
Chorus
# National Asphalt Pavement Association v. Train

* related portals: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
* 539 F.2d 775
* NATIONAL ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASSOCIATION, A MARYLAND NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION, PETITIONER, WARREN BROTHERS COMPANY, A DIVISION OF ASHLAND OIL, INC. and ASHLAND OIL INC., PETITIONER,
* v.
* RUSSELL E. TRAIN, ADMINISTRATOR, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT
* No. 74-1332, 74-1388
* United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
* October 22, 1975, Argued
* July 21, 1976, Decided
Petition for Review of an Order of the Environmental Protection Agency.
T. Neal Combs, with whom George D. Webster and William I. Althen were on the brief, for Petitioner in No. 74-1332.
Theodore L. Garrett, with whom H. Edward Dunkelberger, Jr. and John P. Rupp, were on the brief, for Petitioner in No. 74-1388.
William L. Want, Attorney, Department of Justice, and Jeffrey O. Cerar, Attorney, Environmental Protection Agency, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice by special leave of court, with whom Wallace H. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, Robert V. Zener, General Counsel, Environmental Protection Agency, Edmund B. Clark, Martin Green and James R. Walpole, Attorneys, Department of Justice, were on the brief, for Respondents.
McGowan and MacKinnon, Circuit Judges and James B. McMillan, United States District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge McGowan.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Sitting by designation pursuant to Title 28, U.S. Code, Section 292(d).
# National Anthem of the Kyrgyz Republic

* information about this edition.
* related portals: National anthems, Kyrgyzstan.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
The National Anthem of the Kyrgyz Republic was composed by Nasyr Davlesov and Kalyi Moldobasanov, and the words were written by Djamil Sadykov and Eshmambet Kuluev. Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Translation of original Kyrgyz lyrics in English

White-capped rocky cliffs and steppes Are equal to the soul of our people. For countless centuries, our fathers Have lived in and kept the Ala-Too.
Chorus: March forward, Kyrgyz people, On the way to freedom! Prosperity and progress, Your own fate is in your hands!
Long ago, our friendly people Completed and gave us the clasp to nature. We acquired an accord of harmony And peace over the Kyrgyz land.
Chorus
Our hopes and aspirations have been fulfilled, Our people wave the flag of freedom. The tradition of our fathers came to us, Let generations keep our holy heritage.
Chorus
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# National Archives request to State Department to explain Hillary Clinton emails

* related authors: Hillary Rodham Clinton.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons gallery, quotes, news, Wikidata item.
National Archives and Records Administration formal request to United States Department of State to explain Hillary Clinton email practices and chain of record-keeping while she was United States Secretary of State. Source: politico.com (archived by the Internet Archive), further info at Archives wants explanation for Hillary Clinton email practices (archived by the Internet Archive). March 3, 2015.
MAR 03 2015
Margaret P. Grafeld Deputy Assistant Secretary for Global Information Services Bureau of Administration U.S. Department of State SA-2, Suite 8000 515 22nd Street, NW Washington, DC 20522-0208
Dear Ms. Grafeld:
The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is concerned with the events outlined in the March 2, 2015, New York Times article by Michael S. Schmidt regarding the potential alienation of Federal email records created or received by former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. The article also suggests potential issues with the Federal email record created or received by former Secretaries of State dating back to Secretary Madeleine K. Albright.
Based on this article and other news reports, NARA is concerned that Federal records may have been alienated from the Department of State's official recordkeeping systems.
Pursuant to your Department's responsibilities under 44 U.S.C. Chapter 31 and NARA's authorities in 44 U.S.C. Chapter 29, we request that the Department of State explore this matter and provide NARA a report of how these records were managed and the current status of these records.
We request that you provide us with a report as required and described in 36 CFR 1230.14 within 30 days of the date of this letter.
If Federal records have been alienated, please describe all measures the Department has taken, or expects to take, to retrieve the alienated records. Please also include a description of all safeguards established to prevent records alienation incidents from happening in the future. Please also provide NARA all guidance and directives disseminated within the Department that address the management of email records, including those records created using personal email accounts.
If you are unable to provide a report within 30 days, please provide us with an interim report indicating what actions you have taken and when you expect to submit a final report.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
[signature]
PAUL M. WESTER, JR. Chief Records Officer for the U.S. Government
| cc: | Ambassador Patrick F. Kennedy Under Secretary for Management Senior Agency Official for Records Management U.S. Department of State Washington, DC 20520 |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume III/Doctrinal Treatises of St. Augustin/On the Catechising of the Uninstructed/Introductory Notice

Introductory Notice.
In the fourteenth chapter of the second book of his Retractations, Augustin makes the following statement: “There is also a book of ours on the subject of the Catechising of the Uninstructed, [or, for Instructing the Unlearned, De Catechizandis Rudibus], that being, indeed, the express title by which it is designated. In this book, where I have said, ‘Neither did the angel, who, in company with other spirits who were his satellites, forsook in pride the obedience of God, and became the devil, do any hurt to God, but to himself; for God knoweth how to dispose of souls that leave Him:’ it would be more appropriate to say, ‘spirits that leave Him,’ inasmuch as the question dealt with angels. This book commences in these terms: ‘You have requested me, brother Deogratias.’ ”
The composition so described in the passage cited is reviewed by Augustin in connection with other works which he had in hand about the year 400 A.D., and may therefore be taken to belong to that date. It has been conjectured that the person to whom it is addressed may perhaps be the same with the presbyter Deogratias, to whom, as we read in the epistle which now ranks as the hundred and second, Augustin wrote about the year 406, in reply to some questions of the pagans which were forwarded to him from Carthage.
The Benedictine editors introduce the treatise in the following terms: “At the request of a deacon of Carthage, Augustin undertakes the task of teaching the art of catechising; and in the first place, he gives certain injunctions, to the effect that this kind of duty may be discharged not only in a settled method and an apt order, but also without tediousness, and in a spirit of cheerfulness. Thereafter reducing his injunctions to practical use, he gives an example of what he means by delivering two set discourses, presenting parallels to each other, the one being somewhat lengthened and the other very brief, but both suitable for the instruction of any individual whose desire is to be a Christian.”
[This treatise shows what was thought in the age of Saint Augustin to be the most needful instruction in religion. The Latin text: De Cactechizandis Rudibus, is in the sixth vol. of the Benedictine edition, and in the handy ed. of C. Marriott: S. Augustini Opuscula quædam, Oxford and London (Parker & Co.) 4th ed. 1885. An earlier and closer English Version by Rev. C. L. Cornish, M. A., of Exeter College, Oxford, appeared in the Oxford “Library of the Fathers” (1847, pp. 187 sqq.,) under the title On Instructing the Unlearned. H. De Romestin reproduces the Oxford translation in the English version of Marriott’s ed. of five treatises of St. Augustin, Oxford and London, 1885, pp. 1–71.—P.S.]
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume III/Doctrinal Treatises of St. Augustin/The Enchiridion/Chapter 22

Chapter 22.—A Lie is Not Allowable, Even to Save Another from Injury.
But every lie must be called a sin, because not only when a man knows the truth, but even when, as a man may be, he is mistaken and deceived, it is his duty to say what he thinks in his heart, whether it be true, or whether he only think it to be true. But every liar says the opposite of what he thinks in his heart, with purpose to deceive. Now it is evident that speech was given to man, not that men might therewith deceive one another, but that one man might make known his thoughts to another. To use speech, then, for the purpose of deception, and not for its appointed end, is a sin. Nor are we to suppose that there is any lie that is not a sin, because it is sometimes possible, by telling a lie, to do service to another. For it is possible to do this by theft also, as when we steal from a rich man who never feels the loss, to give to a poor man who is sensibly benefited by what he gets. And the same can be said of adultery also, when, for instance, some woman appears likely to die of love unless we consent to her wishes, while if she lived she might purify herself by repentance; but yet no one will assert that on this account such an adultery is not a sin. And if we justly place so high a value upon chastity, what offense have we taken at truth, that, while no prospect of advantage to another will lead us to violate the former by adultery, we should be ready to violate the latter by lying? It cannot be denied that they have attained a very high standard of goodness who never lie except to save a man from injury; but in the case of men who have reached this standard, it is not the deceit, but their good intention, that is justly praised, and sometimes even rewarded. It is quite enough that the deception should be pardoned, without its being made an object of laudation, especially among the heirs of the new covenant, to whom it is said: “Let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.” And it is on account of this evil, which never ceases to creep in while we retain this mortal vesture, that the co-heirs of Christ themselves say, “Forgive us our debts.”

## Footnotes

* ↑ Matt. v. 37
* ↑ Matt. vi. 12