OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Myths and Legends of Our Own Land/Volume 1/Mark of the Spirit Hand

Layout 2
MARK OF THE SPIRIT HAND
A{{larger|NDOVER New Jersey, was quaint and quiet in the days before the Revolution—it is not a roaring metropolis, even yet—and as it offered few social advantages there was more gathering in tap-rooms and more drinking of flip than there should have been. Among those who were not averse to a cheering cup were three boon companions, Bailey, Hill, and Evans, farmers of the neighborhood. They loved the tavern better than the church, and in truth the church folk did not love them well, for they were suspected of entertaining heresies of the most forbidden character. It was while they were discussing matters of belief over their glasses that one of them proposed, in a spirit of bravado, that which-ever of the trio might be first to die should come back from the grave and reveal himself to the others—if he could—thus settling the question as to whether there was a future.
Not long after this agreement—for consent was unanimous—Hill departed this life. His friends lamented his absence, especially at the tavern, but they anticipated no attempt on his part to express the distinguished consideration that he had felt for his old chums. Some weeks passed, yet there was no sign, and the two survivors of the party, as they jogged homeward to the house where both lived, had begun to think and speak less frequently of the absent one. But one night the household was ​alarmed by a terrible cry. Bailey got a light and hurried to the bedside of his friend, whom he found deathly white and holding his chest as if in pain. "He has been here!" gasped Evans. "He stood here just now."
"Who?" asked Bailey, a creep passing down his spine.
"Hill! He stood there, where you are now, and touched me with a hand that was so cold—cold———" and Evans shivered violently. On turning back the collar of his shirt the impression of a hand appeared on the flesh near the shoulder a hand in white, with one finger missing. Hill had lost a finger. There was less of taverns after that night, for Evans carried the token of that ghostly visit on his person until he, too, had gone to solve the great secret.
# Myths and Legends of Our Own Land/Volume 1/Delaware Water Gap

Layout 2
DELAWARE WATER GAP
THE Indian name of this beautiful region, Minisink, "the water is gone," agrees with the belief of geologists that a lake once existed behind the Blue Ridge, and that it burst its way through the hills at this point. Similar results were produced by a cataclysm on the Connecticut at Mount Holyoke, on the Lehigh at Mauch Chunk, and Runaway Pond, New Hampshire, got its name by a like performance. The aborigines, whatever may be said against them, enjoyed natural beauty, and their habitations were often made in this delightful region, their councils being attended by chief Tamanend, or Tammany, a Delaware, whose wisdom and virtues were such as to raise him to the place of patron saint of America. The notorious Tammany Society of New York is named for him. When this chief became old and feeble his tribe abandoned him in a hut at New Britain, Pennsylvania, and there he tried to kill himself by stabbing, but failing in that, he flung burning leaves over himself, and so perished. He was buried where he died. It was a princess of his tribe that gave the name of Lover's Leap to a cliff on Mount Tammany, by leaping from it to her death, because her love for a young European was not reciprocated.
There is a silver-mine somewhere on the opposite mountain of Minsi, the knowledge of its location having perished with the death of a recluse, who ​coined the metal he took from it into valuable though illegal dollars, going townward every winter to squander his earnings. During the Revolution "Oran the Hawk," a Tory and renegade, was vexatious to the people of Delaware Valley, and a detachment of colonial troops was sent in pursuit of him. They overtook him at the Gap and chased him up the slopes of Tammany, though he checked their progress by rolling stones among them. One rock struck a trooper, crushed him, and bore him down to the base of a cliff, his blood smearing it in his descent. But though he seemed to have eluded his pursuers, Oran was shot in several places during his flight, and when at last he cast himself into a thicket, to rest and get breath, it was never to rise again. His bones, cracked by bullets and gnawed by beasts, were found there when the leaves fell.
# Myths and Legends of Our Own Land/Volume 1/The Missing Soldier of Valley Forge

Layout 2
THE MISSING SOLDIER OF VALLEY FORGE
DURING the dreadful winter of the American encampment at Valley Forge six or eight soldiers went out to forage for provisions. Knowing that little was to be hoped for near the camp of their starving comrades, they set off in the direction of French Creek. At this stream the party separated, and a little later two of the men were attacked by Tory farmers. Flying along the creek for some distance they came to a small cave in a ​bluff, and one of them, a young Southerner named Carrington, scrambled into it. His companion was not far behind, and was hurrying toward the cave, when he was arrested by a rumble and a crash: a block of granite, tons in weight, that had hung poised overhead, slid from its place and completely blocked the entrance. The stifled cry of despair from the living occupant of the tomb struck to his heart. He hid in a neighboring wood until the Tories had dispersed, then, returning to the cave, he strove with might and main to stir the boulder from its place, but without avail.
When he reached camp, as he did next day, he told of this disaster, but the time for rescue was believed to be past, or the work was thought to be too exhausting and dangerous for a body of men who had much ado to keep life in their own weak frames. It was a double tragedy, for the young man's sweetheart never recovered from the shock that the news occasioned, and on her tomb, near Richmond, Virginia, these words are chiselled: "Died, of a broken heart, on the 1st of March, 1780, Virginia Randolph, aged 21 years, 9 days. Faithful unto death." In the summer of 1889 some workmen, blasting rock near the falls on French Creek, uncovered the long-concealed cavern and found there a skeleton with a few rags of a Continental uniform. In a bottle beside it was an account, signed by Arthur L. Carrington, of the accident that had befallen him, and a letter declaring undying love for his sweetheart. ​He had starved to death. The bones were neatly coffined, and were sent to Richmond to be buried beside those of the faithful Miss Randolph.
# The Atlantic Monthly/Volume 1/Number 6

First volume, sixth number of The Atlantic Monthly. Published April 1858.

### Articles and stories

* The Hundred Days, by George Robert Russell
* My Journal to my Cousin Mary
* The Catacombs of Rome, by Charles Eliot Norton
* The Pure Pearl of Diver's Bay, by Caroline Chesebro'
* The Abbé de l'Épée, by Linus Pierpont Brockett
* Who is the Thief?, by Shirley Brooks
* Persian Poetry, by Ralph Waldo Emerson
* The Autocrat of the Breakfast-Table, by Oliver Wendell Holmes
* Mr. Buchanan's Administration, by James Russell Lowell
* Literary Notices

### Poems

* "Amours de Voyage", by Arthur Hugh Clough
* "Happiness", by James Russell Lowell
* "Sandalphon", by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow
* "The Story of Karin", by John Greenleaf Whittier
* "Telling the Bees", by John Greenleaf Whittier
# Myths and Legends of Our Own Land/Volume 1/Heartbreak Hill

Layout 2
HEARTBREAK HILL
THE name of Heartbreak Hill pertains, in the earliest records of Ipswich, to an eminence in the middle of that town on which there was a large Indian settlement, called Agawam, before the white men settled there and drove the inhabitants out. Ere the English colony had been firmly ​planted a sailor straying ashore came among the simple natives of Agawam, and finding their ways full of novelty he lived with them for a time. When he found means to return to England he took with him the love of a maiden of the tribe, but the girl herself he left behind, comforting her on his departure with an assurance that before many moons he would return. Months went by and extended into years, and every day the girl climbed Heartbreak Hill to look seaward for some token of her lover. At last a ship was seen trying to make harbor, with a furious gale running her close to shore, where breakers were lashing the rocks and sand. The girl kept her station until the vessel, becoming unmanageable, was hurled against the shore and smashed into a thousand pieces. As its timbers went tossing away on the frothing billows a white, despairing face was lifted to hers for an instant; then it sank and was seen nevermore her lover's face. The "dusky Ariadne" wasted fast from that day, and she lies buried beside the ledge that was her watch-tower.
# Poems: New and Old (Newbolt)/Seringapatam

Seringapatam
# Poems: New and Old (Newbolt)/A Ballad of John Nicholson

A Ballad of John Nicholson
# Poems: New and Old (Newbolt)/The Guides at Cabul, 1879

The Guides at Cabul
(1879)
# Japanese Homes and Their Surroundings

JAPANESE HOMES
AND
THEIR SURROUNDINGS
BY
EDWARD S. MORSE
DIRECTOR OF THE PEABODY ACADEMY OF SCIENCE;
LATE PROFESSOR OF ZOÖLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF TOKIO, JAPAN; MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE; FELLOW OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ETC.
WITH ILLUSTRATIONS
BY THE AUTHOR
NEW YORK HARPER & BROTHERS, FRANKLIN SQUARE 1889
page
# Myths and Legends of Our Own Land/Volume 1/A Blow in the Dark

Layout 2
A BLOW IN THE DARK
THE Tory Manheim sits brooding in his farmhouse near Valley Forge, and his daughter, with a hectic flush on her cheek, looks out into the twilight at the falling snow. She is worn and ill; ​she has brought on a fever by exposure incurred that very day in a secret journey to the American camp, made to warn her lover of another attempt on the life of Washington, who must pass her father's house on his return from a distant settlement. The Tory knows nothing of this; but he starts whenever the men in the next room rattle the dice or break into a ribald song, and a frown of apprehension crosses his face as the foragers crunch by, half-barefoot, through the snow. The hours go on, and the noise in the next room increases; but it hushes suddenly when a knock at the door is heard. The Tory opens it, and trembles as a tall, grave man, with the figure of an athlete, steps into the fire-light and calmly removes his gloves. "I have been riding far," said he. Can you give me some food and the chance to sleep for an hour, until the storm clears up?"
Manheim says that he can, and shuffling into the next room, he whispers, "Washington!" The girl is sent out to get refreshments. It is in vain that she seeks to sign or speak to the man who sits there so calmly before the fire, for her father is never out of sight or hearing. After Washington has finished his modest repast he asks to be left to himself for a while, but the girl is told to conduct him to the room on the left of the landing on the next floor.
Her father holds the candle at the foot of the stairs until he sees his guest enter; then he bids his ​daughter go to her own bed, which is in the chamber on the right of the landing. There is busy whispering in the room below after that, and the dice box is shaken to see to whose lot it shall fall to steal up those stairs and stab Washington in his sleep. An hour passes and all in the house appear to be at rest, but the stairs creak slightly as Manheim creeps upon his prey. He blows his candle out and softly enters the chamber on the left. The men, who listen in the dark at the foot of the stair, hear a moan, and the Tory hurries back with a shout of gladness, for the rebel chief is no more and Howe's reward will enrich them for life.
Glasses are filled, and in the midst of the rejoicing a step is heard on the stair. Washington stands before them. In calm, deep tones he thanks the farmer for his shelter, and asks that his horse be brought to the door and his reckoning be made out. The Tory stares as one bereft. Then he rushes aloft, flings open the door of the room on the left, and gazes at the face that rests on the pillow, a pillow that is dabbled with red. The face is that of his daughter. The name of father is one that he will never hear again in this world. The candle falls from his hand; he sinks to the floor; be his sin forgiven! Outside is heard the tramp of a horse. It is that of Washington, who rides away, ignorant of the peril he has passed and the sacrifice that averted it.
# Myths and Legends of Our Own Land/Volume 1

Layout 2
Myths and Legends of Our Own Land
Third Edition
Sleepy Hollow Bridge
See page 48
Myths & Legends of Our Own Land
By Charles M. Skinner
Vol. I.
Philadelphia & London J. B. Lippincott Company 1896
Copyright, 1896, by J. B. Lippinott Company.
Printed by J. B. Lippinott Company, Philadelphia, U.S.A.
THESE VOLUMES,
BEING CONCERNED WITH AMERICA AND AMERICANS,
I Dedicate
TO THOSE STERLING PATRIOTS,
MY CHILDREN.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Work-a-day Warriors/The Willow Tree

THE WILLOW TREE
# Work-a-day Warriors/Verse Vindictive

VERSE VINDICTIVE
3668 PRIVATE WILLIAM WARLEY TO KAISER WILHELM II
# Work-a-day Warriors/Trench Thoughts: Christmas 1916

ONE LOVED COT I KNOW
TRENCH THOUGHTS
CHRISTMAS 1916
# Work-a-day Warriors/The Song of the Sock

THE SONG OF THE SOCK
DEDICATED TO LADY BAXTER OF INVEREIGHTY
# United States v. Google/Conclusions of Law/Section 2

Layout 2
​II. MONOPOLY POWER: GENERAL SEARCH SERVICES
The Supreme Court has defined “monopoly power” to mean “the power to control prices or exclude competition.” United States v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 351 U.S. 377, 391 (1956). “More precisely, a firm is a monopolist if it can profitably raise prices substantially above the competitive level.” Microsoft, 253 F.3d at 51. Direct evidence of such pricing power is “rarely available[.]” Id. So, “courts more typically examine market structure in search of circumstantial evidence of monopoly power.” Id. Applying this “structural approach,” a court may infer monopoly power “from a firm’s possession of a dominant share of a relevant market that is protected by entry barriers.” Id. Entry barriers are factors “that prevent new rivals from timely responding to an increase in price above the competitive level.” Id.
Plaintiffs maintain that Google has monopoly power in the product market for general search services in the United States. According to Plaintiffs, Google has a dominant and durable share in that market, and that share is protected by high barriers to entry. Google counters that there is no such thing as a product market for general search services. What exists instead, Google insists, is a broader market for query responses, in which there is vigorous competition. Google’s Post-Trial Br., ECF No. 908 [hereinafter GTB], at 8–15. That market includes a host of other firms that fall outside of Plaintiffs’ proposed market, including (1) SVPs like Amazon, Booking.com, and Yelp, (2) social media companies like Meta (which owns Facebook and Instagram) and TikTok, and (3) prominent stand-alone websites, like ​Wikipedia. Id. These firms answer queries and therefore compete with Google. Secondarily, even if there is a product market for general search services, Google argues that it lacks monopoly power in it. The emergence of other search competitors, Google says, proves that barriers to entry are not as high as Plaintiffs claim.
# United States v. Google/Conclusions of Law/Section 3

Layout 2
​III. MONOPOLY POWER: ADVERTISING MARKETS
The court now moves from search to advertising. Plaintiffs collectively assert that Google has monopoly power in three overlapping advertising markets. These markets and their relationships are illustrated below. U.S. Plaintiffs allege the broadest proposed market, search advertising, which includes all advertisements served in response to a query, regardless of the digital platform. Within the search ads market, Plaintiff States define a general search advertising market that includes only ads served on GSEs. Finally, both sets of Plaintiffs propose a general search text advertising market, limited to text ads appearing on a GSE’s SERP. Google counters that Plaintiffs’ proposed markets do not comport with business realities. There is, according to Google, one omnibus market for digital advertising, and the markets as alleged exclude various digital ad types that are effective substitutes for Google’s text and shopping ads.
The court considers each of Plaintiffs’ proposed markets under the Brown Shoe factors, and, to the extent that it recognizes a market, determines whether Google has monopoly power within it. The court addresses the broadest market first (search advertising), followed by the narrowest (general search text advertising), and then concludes with the one in between (general search advertising). It finds as follows. First, although there is a relevant product market for search advertising, Google does not monopolize it. Second, general search text advertising is a relevant product market in which Google has monopoly power. Finally, a relevant product market for general search advertising does not exist.
# Orlando Evening Star/1941/Mr. Jarvis A. Lattin

* related portals: Jarvis Andrew Lattin.
* sister projects: quotes, Wikidata item.
Jarvis Andrew Lattin (1853-1941) obituary in the Orlando Evening Star on February 22, 1941.
Mr. Jarvis A. Lattin.
Deland, Florida; February 22, 1941. (Special) Mr. Jarvis A. Lattin, 87-year-old Lake Helen resident, died in his home there at 5 o'clock Friday morning, having been in poor health for several years. Born May 29, 1853 in Farmingdale, Long Island, New York, where he spent most of his life as a pickle manufacturer, he retired and moved to West Volusia County 15 years ago. Accompanied by Mrs. Alice Fletcher of Lake Helen, the body was forwarded to Farmingdale for the funeral and burial this afternoon. The Allen-Summerhill Company had charge of local arrangements.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works could have had their copyright renewed between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st of the 29th year.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Google/Conclusions of Law/Section 4

Layout 2
​IV. EXCLUSIVE DEALING
Before moving forward, it is worthwhile to pause and summarize where we are. The court has found that Plaintiffs have proven that Google has monopoly power in two relevant product markets: general search services and general search text advertising. On the other hand, although the court recognized a separate market for search ads, it found that Google did not have monopoly power in that market. It also rejected a separate general search ads market. As to the latter two markets, the court’s Section 2 inquiry proceeds no further.
Because “having a monopoly does not by itself violate § 2,” Microsoft, 253 F.3d at 58, the next step in the analysis is to determine whether Google has engaged in exclusionary conduct with respect to general search services and general search text advertising. Plaintiffs must prove a second element, which is “the willful acquisition or maintenance of [monopoly] power as distinguished from growth or development as a consequence of a superior product, business acumen, or historic accident.” Id. at 50 (internal quotation marks omitted). The bulk of Plaintiffs’ case focuses on the search distribution contracts—the browser agreements (primarily with Apple and Mozilla) and the Android agreements (the MADAs and RSAs)—which Google allegedly uses to maintain its monopoly in the relevant markets.
According to Plaintiffs, the challenged contracts are unlawful exclusive agreements. They effectively block Google’s rivals from the most effective channels of search distribution, namely, the out-of-the-box default search settings. Google is the exclusive default search engine on the Safari and Firefox browsers. Likewise, on all Android devices, the Google Search Widget appears on the home screen and, on all except Samsung devices, Chrome is preloaded as the exclusive ​browser. Plaintiffs say that these distribution contracts effectively “lock up” half of the market for search and, by extension, nearly half of the market for general search text ads. These exclusive deals protect Google’s dominant position and shield it from meaningful competition. Plaintiffs also specify certain contractual provisions that they claim thwart competition. The ISA, for example, contains provisions arguably restricting Apple’s ability to divert queries away from Google and serve search ads, and the RSAs prohibit partners from preloading “alternative search services” on Android devices.
Before turning to the merits of Plaintiffs’ arguments, the court considers two threshold matters. First, Google contends that it is not subject to Section 2 liability because its positions as the default GSE are the product of “competition for the contract” and thus are not exclusionary. Second, Plaintiffs maintain that the court should eschew Microsoft’s exclusive dealing framework in favor of a broader “general Section 2 standard.” UPCL at 14. The court rejects both arguments.
# United States v. Google/Conclusions of Law/Section 4B

Layout 2
    B. The Microsoft Exclusive Dealing Framework Is Applicable.
Before turning to a more detailed discussion of the market effects, the court addresses the proper analytical framework within which to view the challenged distribution agreements. From the outset, Plaintiffs have framed this case as one about exclusive dealing. See, e.g., Am. Compl. ¶¶ 78–79 (Android agreements), 118–119 (Apple), 156 (browser agreements). Unexpectedly, for the first time post-trial, Plaintiffs contend that the court should eschew considering the agreements through the lens of exclusivity, which they now deem “too narrow,” but instead should “opt for the general Section 2 standard, even when harm resulted from agreements blocking access to distribution.” UPCL at 13–16.
The court declines to ratify what Google rightly calls a “dramatic post-trial shift[.]” GRCL at 1. Microsoft compels application of the exclusive dealing framework. See 253 F.3d at 69–70. That framework requires the court to consider, at the threshold, the degree to which the agreements foreclose the relevant markets. Id. But because foreclosure is only a “useful screening function,” the court also must identify real-world anticompetitive effects that arise from such agreements. Id. at 69; McWane, 783 F.3d at 835 (describing foreclosure as a “proxy for ​anticompetitive harm”). Perhaps that is what Plaintiffs mean by the “general Section 2 standard.” UPCL at 14. In any event, the court’s analysis follows Microsoft.