# The United Amateur/April 1916/Department Of Public Criticism

The United Amateur
Official Organ of the United Amateur Press Association
Department Of Public Criticism
The Brooklynite for January contains one of Rheinhart Kleiner’s characteristic poems, entitled “A Mother’s Song”. Mr. Kleiner’s command of good taste, harmony, and correctness repuires no further panegyric amongst those who know him; but to the more recent United members who have not yet read extensively in our journals, his work may well be recommended as undoubtedly the safest of all amateur poetical models for emulation. Mr. Kleiner has a sense of musical rhythm which few amateur bards have ever possessed, and his choice of words and phrases is the result of a taste both innate and cultivated, whose quality appears to rare advantage in the present degenerate age. This remarkable young poet has not yet fully displayed in verse the variety of thoughts and images of which his fertile brain and well selected reading have made him master, but has preferred to concentrate most of his powers upon delicate amatory lyrics. While some of his readers may at times regret this limitation of endeavor, and wish he might practice to a greater extent that immense versatility which he permitted the amateur public to glimpse in the September Piper; it is perhaps not amiss that he should cultivate most diligently that type of composition most natural and easy to him, for he is obviously a successor of those polished and elegant poets of gallantry whose splendour adorned the reigns of Queen Elizabeth and King James the First. *** The Conservative for January opens with Winifred Virginia Jordan’s “Song of the North Wind”, one of the most powerful poems lately seen in the amateur press. Mrs. Jorden is the newest addition to the United’s constellation of genuine poetical luminaries; shining an an artist of lively imabination, faultless taste, and graphic expression, whose work possesses touches of genius and individualism that have already brought her renown in amateur circles. In the poem under consideration, Mrs. Jordon displays a phenomenal comprehension of the sterner aspects of Nature, producing a thoroughly virile effect. Words are chosen with care end placed with remarkable force, whilst both alliteration and onomatopoeia are employed with striking success. By the same author is the shorter poem entitled “Galileo and Swammerdam”, which though vastly different in aspect and rhythm, yet retains that suggestion of mysticism so frequently encountered in Mrs. Jordon’s work.
James Tobey Pyke, a lyrical and philosophical poet of high scholastic attainments, contributes two poems; “Maia”, and “The Poet”. The latter is a stately sonnet, rich in material for reflection. Such is the quality of Mr. Pyke’s work, that his occasional contributions are ever to be acclaimed with the keenest interest and appreciation.
Rheinhart Kleiner, our Laureate, is another bard twice represented in the January Conservative. His two poems, “Consolation” and “To Celia”, though widely different in structure, are yet not unrelated in sentiment, being both devoted to the changing heart. One amateur critic has seen fit to frown upon so skilled an apotheosis of inconsistancy, but is seems almost captious thus to analyse an innocuous bit of art so daintily and tastefully arrayed. “To Celia” is perhaps slightly the better of the two, having a very commendable stateliness of cadence, and a gravity of thought greater than that of “Consolation”.
“The Horizon of dreams”, by Mrs. Renshaw, is a graphic and enthralling venture into the realm of nocturnal unreality. The free play of active imagination, the distorted and transitory conceptions and apparitions, and the strangely elusive analogies, all lend charm and color to this happy portrayal of the vague boundaries of Somnus’ domain. Mrs. Renshaw’s rank as a poet is a very high tone, most of her ​productions involving a spiritual insight and metaphysical comprehension vastly beyond that of the common mind. But this very nobility of imagination, and superiorty to the popular appeal, are only too likely to render her best work continually underestimated and unappreciated by the majority. She is not a “poet of the masses”, and her graver efforts must needs reach audiences more notable for cultured than numerical magnitude. Of Mrs. Renshaw’s liberal metrical theories, enough is said elsewhere. This Department can neither endorse principles so radical, nor refrain from remarking that want of proper rhyme and metre has relegated to obscurity many a rich and inspired poem.
“Departed”, by Maude Kingsbury Barton, is a sentimental poem of undoubted grace and sweetness, hapily cast in unbroken metre. *** The Coyote for January is adorned by no less than three of Mrs. Winifred V. Jordan’s exquisite short poems. “The Night-Wind” is a delicately beautful fragment of dreamy metaphor. There is probably a slight misprint in the last line, since the construction there becomes somewhat obscure. “My Love’s Eyes” has merit, but lacks polish. The word “azure” in the first stanza, need not be in the posessive case; whilst the use of a singular verb with a plural noun in the second stanza (smiles--beguiles) is a little less than grammatical. “Longing” exhibits the author at her best, the images and phraseology alike showing the touch of genius.
Other poetry in this issue is by Adam Dickson, a bard of pleasing manner but doubtful correctness. “Smile” needs rigorous metrical and rhetorical revision to escape puerility. “Silver Bells of Memory” is better, though marred by the ungramatical passage “thoughts doth linger”. In this passage, either the noun must be made singular, or the verb form plural.
“Prohibition in Kansas” is a well written prose article by Editor William T. Harington, wherein he exhibits a commendably favourable attitude toward the eradication of the menace of strong drink. Mr. Harrington is an able and active amateur, and takes an intelligent interest in many public questions. His style and taste are steadily improving, so that The Coyote has already become a paper of importance among us. *** The Dixie Booster for January is Mr. Raymond B. Nixon’s Capital City News, transferred to the amateur world, and continued under the new name. With this number the editor’s brother, Mr. Roy W. Nixon, assumes the position of Associate Editor. This neat little magazine is home printed throughout, and may well remind the old-time amateurs of those boyish “palmy days” whose passing they lament so frequently. By means of a cue on the third page, we are properly introduced to Editor Nixon, who at present boasts but thirteen years of existence. The gifted and versatile associate editor, Mr. Roy W. Nixon, shows marked talent in three distinct departments of literature; essay-writing, fiction, and verse. “Writing as a Means of Self-Improvement” is a pure, dignified and graceful bit of prose whose thought is as commendable as its structure. “A Bottle of Carbolic Acid” is a gruesome but clever short story of the Poe type, exhibiting considerable comprehension of abnorman pschology as treated in literature. “My Valentine” is a poem of tuneful letre and well expressed sentiment, though not completely polished throughout. The third stanza, especially, might be made less like prose in its images. *** Dowdell’s Bearcat for December is quaint and attractive in appearance. The youthful editor has provided himself with a series of cuts of the metaphorical “Bruin” in various attitudes and various employments, these clever little pictures lending a pleasing novelty to the cover and the margins. Judiciously distributed red ink, also, aids in producing a Chrismas number of truly festive quality. Mr. Dowdell’s “Growls from the Pit” is a series of editorials both timely and interesting, while his “Did you hear That” is a lively page of fresh news. This issue is notable for Mrs. Winifred V. Jordon’s poetical contributions, of which there are three. “Life’s Sunshine and Shadows” is a tuneful moral poem whose rhythm and imagery are equally excellent. “Contentment” is brief but delightful. “When the Woods Call” is a virile, graphic piece; vibrant with the thrill of the chase, and crisp with the frosty air of the Northern Woods.
The present reviewer’s lines “To Samuel Loveman” contain five misprints, as follows:
| Line | 03 | for | are | read | art |
| Line„ | 05 | for„ | Appollo | read„ | Apollo |
| Line„ | 06 | for„ | versus | read„ | versen |
| Line„ | 15 | for„ | eternal | read„ | ethereal |
| Line„ | 18 | for„ | the | read„ | thee |
“Beads from my Rosary”, by Mary M. Sisson, is a collection of well written and sensible paragraphs on amateur journalism, which ought to assist, in arousing enthusiasm amongst many members hither-to dormant. Editor Dowdell’s pithy little epigrams at the foot of each page form an entertaining feature, many of them being of considerable cleverness. Dowdell’s Bearcat will soon revert to its original newspaper form, since Mr. Dowdell intends to make newspaper work his life Profession. *** The Inspiration for November is a decidedly informal though exceedingly clever personal paper issued by Miss Edna von der Heide as a reminiscence of the Rocky Mount convention. Prose and verse of whimsically humorous levity are employed with success in recording the social side of the amateur gathering. **** The Looking Glass for January is composed wholly of biographical mutter, introducing to the association the multitude of accomplished recruits obtained through Mrs. Renshaw and others. In these forty life stories, most of them autobiographical, the student of human nature may find material for profound reflection on the variety of mankind. The more recent members of the United, as here introduced, are in the aggregate a maturer, more serious, and more scholarly element than that which once dominated the amateur world; and if they can he propertly welcomed and acclimated to the realm of amateur letters, they will be of great value indeed in building up the ideals and character of the association. For this influx of sedate, cultivated members, the Untied has Mrs. Renshaw to thank, since the present policy of recruiting was originated and is conducted largely by the Second Vice President. **** Ole Miss for December is the most important of all recent additions to amateur letters, and it is with regret that we learn of the magazine’s prospective discontinuance. The issue under consideration is largely local, most of the contributions being by Mississippi talent, and it must be said that the contributors all reflect credit upon their native or adopted State.
Mr. J. W. Renshaw’s page of editorials is distinguished equally by good sense and good English. His attitude of disapproval toward petty political activities and fruitless feuds in the United is one which every loyal member will endorse, for nearly all of the past disasters in amateur history have been caused not by serous literary differences, but by conflicting ambitious among those seeking no more than cheap notoriety.
Mrs. Renshaw is well represented both by prose and by verse, the most interesting of her pieces being possibly the essay entitled “Poetic Spontaneity”, wherein more arguments are advanced in her effort to prove the inferior importance of form and metre in poesy. According to Mrs. Renshaw, the essence of all genuine poetry is a certain spontaneous and involuntary spiritual or psychological perception and expression; incapable of rendition in any prescribed structure, and utterly destroyed by subsequent correction or alteration of any kind. That is, the bard must respond unconsciously to the noble impulse furnished by a fluttering bird, a dew-crowned flower, or a sun-blest forest glade; recording his thoughts exactly as evolved, and never revising the result, even though it be detestably cacophonous, or absolutely unintelligible to his less inspired circle of readers. To such a theory as this we must needs reply, that while compositions of the sort indicated may indeed represent poesy, they certainly represent art in its proper sense no more than do “futuristic” pictures and other modern monstrosities of a like nature. The only exact means whereby a poet may transmit his ideas to others is language, a thing both definite and intellectual. Granting that vague, chaotic, dissonant lines are the best form in which the tender suitor of the Muses may record his spiritual impressions for his own benefit and comprehension, it by no means follows that such lines are at all fitted to convey these impressions to minds other than his own. When language is used without appropriateness, harmony, or precision, it can mean but little save to the person who writes it. The soul of a poem is not in words but in meaning; and if the author have any skill at all in recording thought throught language, he will be able to refine the uncouth mass of ​spontaneous verbiage which first comes to him as representing his idea, but which in its original amorphous state may fail entirely to suggest the same idea to another brain. He will be able to preserve and perpetuate his idea in a style of language which the world may understand, and in a rhythm which may not offend the reader’s sense of propriety with conspicuous harshness, breaks, or sudden transitions.
“Flames of the Shadow”, Mrs. Renshaw’s longest poetical contribution to this issue, is a powerful piece which, despite the author’s theory, seems in no way injured by its commendably regular structure. “Immortality of Love” is likewise rather regular, though the plan of rhyming breaks down in the last stanza. “For You” and “Sacrament of Spirit” are short pieces, the former containing an “allowable” rhyming of “tongue” and “long”, which would not meet with the approval of the Kleiner type of critic, but upon which this Department forbears to frown.
James T. Pyke’s two poems, “To a Buterfly” and “Life and Time” are gems of incomparable beauty. “Ole Gardens”, by Winifred V. Jordon, is a haunting bit of semi-irregular verse which deserves warm applause for the cleverness of its imagery and the aptness of its phraseology. “The Reward of it All”, by Emilie C. Holladay, is a potent but pathetic poem of sentiment, whose development is highly commendable, but whose metrical construction might be improved by judicious care. “A Mississippi Autumn” was written as prose by Mrs. Renshaw, and set in heroic verse without change of ideas by the present critic. The metaphor is uniformly lofty and delicate, whilst the development of the sentiment is facile and pleasing. It is to be hoped that the original thoughts of the author are not impaired or obscured by the technical turns of the less inspired versifier. “My Dear, Sweet, Southern Blossom”, dedicated to Mr. and Mrs. Renshaw with Compliments of the Author, James Laurence Crowley, is a saccharine and sentimental piece of verse reminiscent of the popular ballads which flourished ten or more years ago. Triteness is the cardinal defect, for each gentle image is what our discerning private critic Mr. Moe would call a “rubberstamp” phrase. Mr. Crowley requires a rigorous course of reading among the classic poets of our language, and a careful study of their art as a guide to the development of his taste. At present his work has about it a softness bordering on effeminacy, which leads us to believe that his conconception of the poet’s art is rather imperfect. It is only in caricature that we discover the poet as a sighing, long-haired scribbler of gushing flights of infantile awe or immature adoration. Earnestness, dignity, and at times, sonorous stateliness, become a good poet; and such thoughts as are generally suggested by the confirmed use of “Oh”, “Ah”, “dear”, “little”, “pretty”, “darling”, “sweetest flow’ret of all”, “where the morning-glory twineth”, and so on, belong less to literary poetry than to the Irving Berlin song-writing industry of “Tin Pan Alley” in the Yiddish wilds of New York City. Mr. Crowley has energy of no mean sort, and if he will apply himself assiduously to the cultivation of masculine taste and technic, he can achieve a place of prominence among United bards.
W. S. Harrison deserves a word of praise for his poem of Nature, entitled “Our Milder Clime”, wherein he celebrates the charms of Mississippi, his native state. The lines contain an old-fashioned grace too often wanting in contemporary verse. Other contributions to Ole Miss’ are Mrs. Maude K. Barton’s “Something of Natchez”, a very interesting descriptive sketch in prose, and Dr. Rolfe Hunt’s two negro dialect pieces, both of which are of inimitable wit and cleverness. **** The Pipkin for February is the first number of this important high-school journal to be issued without the supervision of Mr. Moe, and its excellence well attests the substantial independent merit of the Appleton club. The city of Appleton forms the dominant theme in this number, and with the assistance of seven attractive half-tone illustrations, the publication well displays the beauty and advantages of the pleasant Wisconsin town. Miss Eleanor Halls cleverly weaves into conversational form much information concerning the remote history of Appleton, emphasizing the superior character resulting from the select quality of the settlers, and the early introduction of learning. Mr. Alfred Galpin surprises many readers when he reveals the fact that Appleton possessed the first of all telephone systems, a surprise quickly followed by Mr. Joseph Harriman’s illustrated paragraph telling of the first street car, also an Appleton innovation. Among other ​articles, that by Miss Torrey on Lawrence College is of unusual interest “The Immortalization of the Princess”, by Miss Fern Sherman, is an excellent Indian tale, whose structure and atmosphere well suggest not only the characteristic tribal legends of the red folk, but other and more classoical myths as well. Though Miss Sherman is not yet a member of the United, one of such gifts would be heartily welcomed in the ranks. *** The Plainsman for December is the most substantial number of his journal which Mr. Ira Cole has yet issued. First in order of importance among the contents is perhaps the editor’s own prose sketch entitled “Monuments”, wherein Mr. Cole reveals to particular advantage his exceptional skill in depicting and philosophizing upon the various aspects and phenomena of Nature. Mr. Cole’s style is constantly improving, though not now of perfect polish, it is none the less remarkable for its grace and fluency. “To Florence Shepphird”, also Mr. Cole, is a rather long piece of blank verse, containing many beautful passages. The author’s skill in stately and sonorous poetry is far above the common level, and his work has about it an atmosphere of the polished past which that of most amateur bards lacks; yet the present poem is not without errors. The passage (lines 10–11) reading: “calm days that knoweth not dread Boreas’ chilling breath” must be changed so that either the noun shall be singular or the verb plural. The double negative in line 23 might well be eliminated. Two lines whose metre could be improved are the 13th and 50th. The final quatrain is pleasing to the average ear, including that of the present critic; though the very exact taste of today, as represented by Mr. Kleiner, frowns upon such deviation from the dominant blank verse arrangement. “On the Cowboys of the West” is a brief bit of verse by this reviewer, accompanied by a note from the pen of Mr. Cole. The note is better than the verse, and exhibits Mr. Cole’s vivid and imaginative prose at its best. “The Sunflower” a versified composition by James Laurence Crowley, concludes the issue. There is much attractiveness in the lines; though we may discover particularly in the second stanza, that touch of excessive softness which occasionally mars Mr. Crowley’s work. No one can fail to discern the weakness of such a line as “You big giant of all the flowers”. *** The Providence Amateur for February is worthy of particular attention on account of Mr. Peter J. MacManus’ absorbing article on “The Irish and the Fairies”. Mr. MacManus firmly believes not only that fairies exist in his native Ireland, but that he has actually beheld a troop of them; facts which impart to this article a physhological as well as a literary interest. The prose style of Mr. MacManus is very good, being notable alike for fluency and freedom from slang, whilst his taste is of the best. His future work will be eagerly awaited by the amateur public. Edmund L. Shehan contributed both verse and prose to this issue. “Death” is a stately poem on a grave subject, whose sentiments are all of suitable humility and dignnity. The apparently anomalous pronoun “her”, in the tenth line, is a misprint for “he”. The piece ends with a rhyming couplet, to which Mr. Kleiner, representing correct modern taste, takes marked exception. The present reviewer, however, finds no reason to object to any part of Mr. Shehan’s poem, and attributes this concluding couplet to the influence of similar Shakespearian terminations. The prose piece by Mr. Shehan well describes a visit to a cinematograph studio, and is entitled “The Making of a Motion Picture”. In the verses entitled “A Post-Christmas Lament”, Mr. John T. Dunn combines much keenness of wit with commendable regularity of metre. Mr. Dunn is among the cleverest of the United’s humorous writers. “To Charlie of the Comics” is a harmless parody on our Laureate’s excellent poem “To Mary of the Movies”, which appeared some time ago in The Piper. In “The Bride of the Sea”, Mr. Lewis Theobald, Jr., presents a rather weird piece of romantic sentimentality of the sort afforded by bards of the early nineteenth century. The metre is regular, and no flagrant violations of gramatical or rhetorical precepts are to be discerned, yet the whole effort lacks clearness, dignity, inspiration, and poetic spontaneity. The word printed “enhanc’d” in the sixth stanza is properly, “entranc’d.” *** Tom Fool, Le Roi bears no definite date, but is a sort of pensive autumn reverie following the Rocky Mount convention of last summer. This grave and dignified journal is ​credited to the House of Tillery, and if typographical evidence may be accepted, it belongs most particularly to that branch now bearing the name of Renshaw and having its domain in Coffeeville, Mississippi. “Mother Gooseries from the Convention”, by Emile C. Holladay, is a long stanzaic and Pindaric ode, whose taste and technic are alike impeccable. The exalted images are sketched with artistic touch, whilst the deep underlying philosophy, skillfully clothed in well balanced lines, arouses a sympathetic reaction from every cultural intellect. “The Carnival” by Mrs. E. L. Whitehead, is an admirable example of stately descriptive prose mixed with aesthetic verse. The long and euphonious periodic sentences suggest the style of Gibbon or of Dr. Johnson, whilst the ocasional metrical lines remind the reviewer of Dr. Young’s solemn “Night Thoughts”. “Dummheit”, by Dora M. Hepner, is a grave discourse on Original Sin, describing the planning of Tom Fool, Le Roi. Elizabeth M. Ballou’s article entitled “Our Absent Friend” forms a notable contribution to amateur historical annals, and displays Miss Ballou as the possessor of a keen faculty for observation, and a phenomenally analytical intellect. “Banqueters from the Styx”, Mrs. Renshaw’s masterly description of the convention dinner and its honoured guests from the regions of Elysium and elsewhere, reminds the reviewer of the 11th book of the Odyssey and the 6th book of the Aeneid, wherein the fraternizing of men with the shades of men is classically delineated.
Tom Fool is a memorable publication, suggesting the old “fraternal” papers, whose passing so many amateurs regret. *** The United Amateur for November contains besides the official matter a small but select assortment of poems, prominent among which is “The Meadow Cricket”, by Jas. T. Pyke. It is impossible to over estimate the beauty of thought and expression which Mr. Pyke shows in all his verses, and the United is fortunate in being able to secure specimens of his work.
“Remorse”, by James Laurence Crowley, is one of the best samples of this gentleman’s poesy which we have yet seen, though Mr. Crowley insists that one of the punctuation marks has been wrongfully located by the reviser. Since the present critic prepared the manuscript for publication, he is willing to assume full culpability for this crime. There is genuine poetic feeling in this short piece; and it seems an undoubted fact that Mr. Crowley with a little added restraint and dignity of expression, is capable of producing excellent work, “List to the Sea”, by Winifred V. Jordon, is a delightfully musical lyric, whose dancing dactyls and facile triple rhymes captivate alike the fancy and the ear. “The Wind and the Beggar”, by Maude K. Barton, is sombre and powerful. “Ambition”, by Wiliam De Ryee, is regular in metre and commendable in sentiment, yet not exactly novel or striking in inspiration. “Choose ye”, by Ella C. Eckert, is a moral poem of clever conception and correct construction. *** The United Official Quarterly for January opens with “A Prayer for the New Year”, by Frederick R. Chenault. Mr. Chenault is a poet of the first order so far as inspiration is concerned, but his work is frequently marred by irregularity of metre, and the use of assonance in place of rhyme. The metre of this poem is correct, but the two attempted rhymes “deeper–meeker” and “supremely–sincerely” are technicly no more than assonant sounds. Pres. Fritter writes very powerfully on our publishing situation in this number; and his article should not only be perused with attention, but heeded with sincerity and industriousness.
“Behind the Canvass Wall”, by William J. Dowdell, is one of the cleverest and most ingenious bits of fiction which the amateur press has contained for some time. That it is of a nature not exactly novel but is a trivial objection. The homely, appealing plot, and the simple, sympathetic treatment, both point to Mr. Dowdell as a possible success in the realm of short story writing, should he ever care to enter it seriously. Another excellent tale is “The Good Will of a Dog”, by P. J. Campbell. The plot is of a well defined type which always pleases, whilst the incidents are graphically delineated. “The Bookstall” is a metrical monstrosity by the present reviewer. Mr. Maurice W. Moe, the distinguished Private Critic, lately gave us the following opinion of ​our vorse. “You are”, he writes, “steeped in the poetry of a certain age; an age, by the way, which cut and fit its thought with greater attention to one model than any other age before or since; and the result is that when you turn to verse as a medium of expression, it is just as if you were pressing a button liberating a perfect flood of these perfectly good but sterotyped formulae of expression. The result is very ingenious, but just because it is such a skillful mosiac of Georgian ‘rubber stamp’ phrases, it must ever fall short of true art”. Mr. Moe is correct. We have, in fact, heard this very criticism reiterated by various authorities aver since those prehistoric days when we began to lisp in numbers. Yet somehow we perversely continue to “mosaic” along in the same old way! But then, we have never claimed to possess “true art”; we are merely a metrical mechanic. “A New Point of View in Home Economics”, a clever article by Miss Eleanor Barnhart, concludes the Official Quarterly proper.
But the New Member supplement, with its profusion of brilliant credentials, yet remains to be considered. “Dutch Courage”, by Louisa E. Boutwell, is a liquorish sketch whose scene is laid in a New Jersey temple of Bacchus. Being totally unaquainted with the true saloon atmosphere, we find ourself a little embarassed as to critical procedure, yet we may justly say that the characters are all well drawn, every man in his humor.
“Ol’ Man Murdock” is a quaint, and in two senses an absorbing, figure. The rest of the issue is given over to the Muses of poesy. “The Saturday Fray” is a clever piece by Daisy Vandenbank. The rhyming is a little uneven, and in one case assonance is made to answer for true rhyme. “Cream” and “mean” cannot make an artistic couplet. “The Common Soldiers”, by John W. Frazer, is a poem of real merit; whilst “Little Boy Blue”, by W. Hume, is likewise effective. Mr. Hume’s pathetic touch is fervent and in no manner betrays that weakness bordering on the ridiculous, to which less skillful fights of pathos are prone. “The Two Springs” is a pleasant moral sermon in verse by Margaret Mien Cooper. Concluding the issue is “The Under Dog in the Fight”, a vigorous philosophical poem by Andrew Stevenson. *** The Woodbee for January is distinguished by Mrs. Winifred V. Jordan’s brilliant short poem entitled “Oh, Where is Springtime”? The sentiment of the piece is an universal one, and the pleasing lines will appeal to all. “Retribution”, by Mrs. Ida C. Haughton, is a clever story, but the present critic’s extreme fondness for cats makes it difficult to review after reading the first sentence. However, the well-approached conclusion is indeed just. The “moral” is a pathetic example of unregeneracy! Miss Edna M. Haughton’s critical article is direct and discerning; the Woodbee Club is fortunate in having among its members so capable a reviewer. Editor Fritter likewise mounts the reviewers throne in this issue, proceeding first of all to demolish our own fond dream of yesterday; The Conservative. Looking backward adown the dim vista of those bygone but memory-haunted days of October, 1915, when we perpetrated the horribly plainspoken and frightfully ungentle number whoreof Mr. Fritter treats, we are conscious of our manifold sins, and must beg the pardon of the liquor interests for shouting so rudely in the cause of total abstinence. Pres. Fritter’s critical style is a good one, and is developing from month to month. His advocacy of lukewarmness in writing is perhaps not so complete as one might judge from this article; though his use of the cautious phrase “it is rumored” in connection with a well known statement seems hardly necessary. Rigid impartiality, the critic’s greatest asset, is manifest throughout the review, and we thoroughly appreciate the favorable mention not infrequently accorded us. In passing upon the merits of Dowdell’s Bearcat, Mr. Fritter shows equal penetration and perspicuity, and we are convinced that his rank amongst amateur reviewers is very high.
H. P. Lovecraft, Chairman.