OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Men-at-the-Bar/James, James Henry

​James, James Henry, special pleader, a student of the Middle Temple 3 Nov., 1851, called to the bar 9 June, 1854 (3rd son of William James, of Hereford, gent., dec.); born , .
    3, Greville Street, Brunswick Square, W.C
# Men-at-the-Bar/James, Edmond

​James, Edmond, a student of Lincoln's Inn 7 May, 1847 (then aged 20), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1852 (4th son of John James, of London, gent.); born , 1827.
# Men-at-the-Bar/James, Edmund

​James, Edmund, B.A. London Univ. 1855, matric. 1852 from King's Coll., London, a student of the Middle Temple 3 Nov., 1853, called to the bar 6 June, 1856 (2nd son of Richard James, Esq., of London); born .
    22, Old Buildings, W.C., or 3, Temple Gardens, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/James, William Price

​James, William Price, B.A., Univ. Coll., Oxon, 1878 (scholar 1874), from Uppingham, goes the South Wales circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 22 Nov., 1877 (then aged 23), called to the bar 11 May, 1881 (eldest son of William Parry James, of Cardiff, architect); born 9 Aug., 1854.
    The Lindens, Cardiff.
# Men-at-the-Bar/James, Gavin Fullarton

​James, Gavin Fullarton, B.A., LL.M., Caius Coll., Camb., 1881, goes the South-eastern circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 10 Jan., 1881 (then aged 21), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1883 (2nd son of Francis Edward James, Esq., of Dublin); born , 1860.
    Dublin.
# Men-at-the-Bar/James, Henry

​James, Sir Henry, Q.C., M.P., attorney-general 1873–4 and since 1880, president (ex-officio) of Bar Committee since Jan., 1884, member (ex-officio) of Incorporated Council of Law Reporting, "postman" in the court of exchequer 1867–9, solicitor-general Sept. to Nov., 1873, M.P. Taunton since 1869, educated at Cheltenham Coll. and member of council, knighted 12 Dec., 1873, a student of the Middle Temple 12 Jan., 1849, lecturer's prizeman 1850–1, called to the bar 16 Jan., 1852, Q.C. 23 June, 1869, bencher 27 Jan., 1870 (youngest son of Philip Turner James, of Hereford, surgeon); born 30 Oct., 1828.
    28, Wilton Place, S.W.; 1, New Court, Temple, E.C.; Devonshire, Reform, Brooks', Garrick, National Liberal, and St. James' Clubs.
# Men-at-the-Bar/James, John Herbert

​James, John Herbert, undergrad. Exeter Coll., Oxon, a. student of Lincoln's Inn 6 Nov., 1880 (then aged 22), called to the bar 7 May, 1884 (6th son of Charles Herbert James, Esq., of Merthyr Tydvil, co. Glamorgan, M.P.); born , 1858.
    Brynteg, Merthyr Tydvil.
# Men-at-the-Bar/James, Francis

​James, Francis, J.P. co. Gloucester, a student of the Middle Temple 3 June, 1856, called to the bar 10 June, 1859 (3rd son of Rev. John James, D.D., canon of Peterborough); born , 1815; married , 1856, Ann, dau. of William Green, Esq., of Londonderry, and has issue.
    109, Cromwell Road, S.W.; Edgeworth Manor, near Cirencester; Burlington Fine Arts Club, W.; National Club, S.W
# Men-at-the-Bar/James, William John

​James, William John, B.A., Jesus Coll., Camb., 1870, a student of the Inner Temple 10 Nov., 1866 (then aged 20), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1871 (eldest son of William James, late of Adelaide, South Australia, gent., dec.); born , 1846.
    Adelaide, South Australia.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Leek, David Calder

​Leek, David Calder, M.A., LL.B. Glasgow Univ., a student of the Middle Temple 25 April, 1881, studentship Trin., 1882, Barstow law scholar 1883, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1884 (2nd son of Rev. Alexander Leek, late of Kilmalcolm, co. Renfrew, dec.); born 22 Oct., 1857.
    1. Paper Buildings, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Lees, James Arthur

​Lees, James Arthur, B.A. Univ. Coll., Oxon, from Eton, J.P. co. Lanc., a student of the Inner Temple 21 Nov., 1873 (aged 21) called to the bar 11 May, 1881 (eldest son of James Lees, J.P., of Alkrington Hall, co. Lanc., gent.); born 14 July, 1852; married 5 Sept., 1882, Lucy Jane, 2nd dau. of Rev. Charles John Martyn, M.A., rector of Long Melford, Suffolk.
    Alkrington Hall, Middleton; 1, St. James' Sq. Manchester.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Leese, Joseph Francis

​Leese, Joseph Francis, B.A. London Univ. 1864 and a member of Convocation, a member of the Northern circuit, J.P. Lancashire, a student of the Inner Temple 11 Nov., 1864 (then aged 19), called to the bar 30 April, 1868 (2nd son of Joseph Leese, Esq., of Altrincham, Cheshire); born , 1845.
    Sendholme, near Wokingham; Winkley Square, Preston; 3, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Lees, Thomas Orde Hastings

​Lees, Thomas Orde Hastings, B.A. Trin. Coll., Dublin, chief constable Northamptonshire constabulary, formerly sub-inspector royal Irish constabulary, went the Midland circuit, a student of the Middle Temple 24 Jan., 1871, called to the bar 9 June, 1880 (only son of Rev. John Lees, M.A., rector of Annadown, co. Galway, dec.); born 22 Feb., 1846; married 24 Aug., 1871, Grace, only child and sole heir of Joshua Wigley Bateman, Esq., of Thornely Hall, Northants, secretary to duchy of Cornwall (see Foster's Baronetage).
    St. Giles' Square, Northampton; 40, Hans Place, Sloane Street, S.W.; 1, Elm Court, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Leeson, Hubert Seymour

​Leeson, Hubert Seymour, a student of the Inner Temple 10 June, 1859 (aged 17), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1862, admitted a barrister of Lincoln's Inn ad eundem 5 Feb., 1874 (eldest son of John Leeson, of Chiswick, Middlesex); born , 1842; mar. 7 May, 1878, Mary Elizabeth, dau. of late Richard Randall, Esq., of Abbey Wood, Kent, and has issue.
    Chiswick, Middlesex.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Lefroy, Alfred Henry

​Lefroy, Alfred Henry, LL.B. Trin. Coll., Camb., a student of Lincoln's Inn 18 Jan., 1878 (then aged 21), called to the bar 29 June, 1881 (5th son of Thomas Paul Lefroy, Q.C., of Ardmore, Bray, co. Wicklow, a judge of county courts Ireland); born , 1857.
    1, Mitre Court Buildings, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Leech, George Crampton

​Leech, George Crampton, B.A. Trin. Coll., Dublin, practises before the supreme court of Victoria, a student of Lincoln's Inn 17 Nov., 1849 (then aged 25), went to the Inner Temple 2 June, 1852, where he was called to the bar 9 June, 1854 (youngest son of John Leech, of Ennis, co. Clare); born , 1824.
    Castlemaine, Victoria.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Leeke, Samuel

​Leeke, Samuel, B.A. (honours), Trin. Coll., Camb., 1870, joint lord of the manors of Portsea, Copnor, and Milton in island of Portsea, Hants, a student of the Inner Temple 11 Nov., 1869 (then aged 21), called to the bar 30 April, 1873, admitted a barrister of Lincoln's Inn ad eundem Nov., 1883 (4th son of Rev. William Leeke, of Holbrooke Hall, co. Derby); born 22 March, 1848; married 7 May, 1875, Constance Jane, eldest dau. of Abel Chapman, Esq., of Woodford, Essex.
    Porlock, Somerset; Sunfield Terrace, Blackheath; 3, Stone Buildings, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Leech, William Ansdell

​Leech, William Ansdell, B.A., Emanuel Coll., Camb., 1868, a student of Lincoln's Inn 16 Nov., 1866 (then aged 24), called to the bar 10 June, 1870 (eldest son of Rev. John Leech, of Mitchelstown, co. Cork); born 30 Sept., 1842; married 20 April, 1867, Florence Bothwell, youngest dau. of William Whitehead, Esq., of Coggeshall, Essex.
    25, Old Buildings, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Leeming, Richard Brettargh

​Leeming, Richard Brettargh, a student of the Middle Temple 7 Jan., 1882, went to the Inner Temple 20 Oct., 1884, where he was called to the bar 17 Nov., 1884 (eldest son of Richard Leeming, of Greaves House, Scotforth, co. Lanc., merchant); born
    Greaves House, Scotforth, co. Lancaster.
# Missouri Railway Company v. Roberts

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
152 U.S. 114
Missouri Railway Company v. Roberts
James Hagerman and T. N. Sedgwick, for plaintiff.
Nelson Case, for defendant.
Mr. Justice FIELD stated the case and delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri Railway Company v. Sealy/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
248 U.S. 363
Missouri Railway Company v. Sealy
Argued: and Submitted Dec. 18, 1918. --- Decided: Jan 7, 1919
In June, 1900, the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company issued bills of lading to shipper's order covering 27 carloads of grain to be shipped from Kansas City, Missouri, to Galveston, Texas. No grain was in fact delivered to it for shipment; but before the fraud was discovered, the alleged shipper transferred the bills of lading to Hutchings, Sealy & Co., who made advances thereon. The advances were not fully repaid, and in 1905 they brought suit against the railroad in a state district court of Kansas. The railroad defended on the ground that since the bills of lading had been delivered in Missouri, the transaction was governed by the Missouri law and that under the law of that state, the railroad was not liable. For more than eight years the record contained no suggestion of a federal question, the case having meanwhile been passed upon twice by the Supreme Court of Kansas. Railway Co. v. Hutchings, 78 Kan. 758, 99 Pac. 230; Hutchings v. Railway Co., 84 Kan. 479, 114 Pac. 1077, 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 500. Thereafter, in 1913, the railroad presented the claim that the transaction was governed by the federal law, and that, by it, the defendant was not liable. The Supreme Court of Kansas, apparently as a matter of state practice, declared that the contention came too late to be considered, and entered judgment for the plaintiff. Hutchings, Sealy & Co. v. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co., 98 Kan. 225, 158 Pac. 62. The case comes here on writ of error under section 237 of the Judicial Code (Act March 3, 1911, c. 231, 36 Stat. 1156 [Comp. St. 1916, § 1214]).
The federal question was not seasonably raised. Bonner v. Gorman, 213 U.S. 86, 91, 29 Sup. Ct. 483, 53 L. Ed. 709; Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Woodford, 234 U.S. 46, 51, 34 Sup. Ct. 739, 58 L. Ed. 1202. But it is also unsubstantial. Prior to the Carmack Amendment (Act June 29, 1906, c. 3591, § 7, pars. 11, 12, 34 Stat. 584, 595 [Comp. St. 1916, §§ 8604a, 8604aa]) the rights of the parties were governed by state law (Boston & Maine Railroad v. Hooker, 233 U.S. 97, 109-110, 34 Sup. Ct. 526, 58 L. Ed. 868, L. R. A. 1915B, 450, Ann. Cas. 1915D, 593; Pennsylvania R. R. Co. v. Hughes, 191 U.S. 477, 24 Sup. Ct. 132, 48 L. Ed. 268; Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. Solan, 169 U.S. 133, 18 Sup. Ct. 289, 42 L. Ed. 688), and the Carmack Amendment does not apply, as the cause of action, if any, arose six years before the passage of that act.
The writ of error is dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri Railway Company v. Sealy

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
248 U.S. 363
Missouri Railway Company v. Sealy
Argued: and Submitted Dec. 18, 1918. --- Decided: Jan 7, 1919
Mr. Joseph M. Bryson, of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Maurice H. Winger and Arthur Miller, both of Kansas City, Mo., for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri Railway Company v. McCann

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
174 U.S. 580
Missouri Railway Company v. McCann
Geo. P. B. Jackson, for plaintiff in error.
J. H. Rodes, for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri Railway Company v. Oklahoma

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
271 U.S. 303
Missouri Railway Company v. Oklahoma
Argued: March 5, 1926. --- Decided: May 24, 1926
Messrs. Jeseph M. Bryson and Charles S. Burg, both of St. Louis, Mo., Maurice D. Green, of Muskogee, Okl., and Howard L. Smith, of Tulsa, Okl., for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Wm. J. Horton, of McAlester, Okl., E. S. Ratiff, of Oklahoma City, Okl., and Jackman A. Gill, of McAlester, Okl., for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mortals! around your destin'd heads

Mortals! around your destin'd heads
 Thick fly the shafts of death,
And lo! the savage spoiler spreads
 A thousand toils beneath.
In vain we trifle with our fate,
 Try every art in vain;
At best we but prolong the date,
 And lengthen out our pain.
Fondly we think all danger fled,
 For death is ever nigh;
Outstrips our unavailing speed,
 Or meets us as we fly.
Thus the wreck'd mariner may strive
 Some desert shore to gain,
Secure of life, if he survive
 The fury of the main.
But there, to famine doom'd a prey,
 Finds the mistaken wretch!
He but escap'd the troubled sea,
 To perish on the beach.
Since then in vain we strive to guard
 Our frailty from the foe;
Lord, let me live not unprepar'd
 To meet the fatal blow!
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Morte d'Arthur

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Morte d'Arthur."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Le Morte d'Arthur, a historical romance by Thomas Malory
* Morte d'Arthur, a poem by Alfred Tennyson
* "Morte d'Arthur," in The Encyclopedia Americana, New York: The Encyclopedia Americana Corporation (1920)
# Mortensen v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
322 U.S. 369
Mortensen v. United States
Argued: March 9, 10, 1944. --- Decided: May 15, 1944
Mr. Eugene D. O'Sullivan, of Omaha, Neb., for petitioners.
Mr. Robert L. Stern, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mortmain

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Mortmain."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Mortmain, a poem by John Cowper Powys
* "Mortmain," in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
* Mortmain (1907), a novel by Arthur Train
# Mortality

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Mortality."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Mortality", a poem by Dinah Maria Craik
* "Mortality", a poem by Paul Laurence Dunbar
* "Mortality", a poem by William Dean Howells
* "Mortality", a poem by William Knox
* "Mortality", a poem by Elizabeth Sherwin
# Morton Salt Company v. G. S. Suppiger Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
314 U.S. 488
Morton Salt Company v. G. S. Suppiger Company
Argued: Dec. 10, 1941. --- Decided: Jan 5, 1942
See 315 U.S. 826, 62 S.Ct. 620, 86 L.Ed. --.
As Amended March 30, 1942.
Mr. Clarence E. Mehlhope, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.
Messrs. Estill E. Ezell and Lawrence C. Kingsland, both of St. Louis, Mo., for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Morton Salt Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
382 U.S. 44
Morton Salt Company v. United States
,DIAMOND CRYSTAL SALT CO.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 276.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.
L. M. McBride and John P. Ryan, Jr., for appellant Morton Salt Co.
R. Willaim Rogers, for appellant Diamond Crystal Salt Co.
Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Turner and Robert B. Hummel, for the United States.
Oct. 25, 1965.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Murray, Rev. John

​Murray, Rev. John, B.A., Sidney Sussex Coll., Camb., 1833, curate of Wickhambrook, Suffolk, 1855-9, of Moulton, co. Camb., 1859-81, a student of the Middle Temple 25 Jan., 1834, called to the bar 19 April, 1839 (only son of Joshua Murray, of Dalham, Suffolk); born , .
    Moulton, Newmarket.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Musgrave, Henry Musgrave

​Musgrave, Henry Musgrave, a student of Lincoln's Inn 21 Nov., 1820 (then aged 20), called to the bar 10 June, 1836 (2nd son of George Musgrave, of 48, Devonshire Street, Portland Place, London); born , 1800; married 21 Dec., 1841, Sarah Popplewell, youngest dau. of late Richard Pullen, Esq., of Harewood, Yorks.
    45, Holland Park, W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Murray, William

​Murray, William, a member of the South-eastern circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 10 Jan., 1848 (then aged 21), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1855 (eldest son of late William Murray, of London, solicitor); born , 1827.
    37, Leinster Square, W.; 1, Pump Court, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Murray, Robert Hay

​Murray, Robert Hay, B.A. Christ Church, Oxon, from Eton, J.P., D.L., high sheriff Surrey 1869, J.P. Kent, a student of Lincoln's Inn 13 Nov., 1848 (then aged 22), called to the bar 30 April, 1853 (3rd son of Rt. Rev. George Murray, D.D., bishop of Rochester); born 26 Sept., 1826; married 8 May, 1849, Elizabeth, only dau. of late Samuel Gregson, Esq., M.P., of Moorlands, co. Lancaster, and has issue (see Foster's Peerage, D. Athole).
    Godinton Park, Ashford, Kent; Arthur's Club.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Murray, William Powell

​Murray, William Powell, M.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1842, a registrar of Bankruptcy Court, a student of Lincoln's Inn 8 Nov., 1836 (then aged 19), called to the bar 23 Nov., 1841 (7th son of Charles Murray, Esq., of Petworth, Sussex); born , 1817; married 27 July, 1854, Georgina Charlotte Daysh, only dau. of Commander the Hon. Arthur Richard Turnour; she died 29 Feb., 1884, leaving issue (see Foster's Peerage, E. Winterton).
    New Grove, Upper Norwood, S.E.; Oxford and Cambridge Club, S.W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Musgrave, George

​Musgrave, George (? M.A. St. John's Coll., Camb.), a student of the Inner Temple 23 July, 1878 (then aged 23), called to the bar 29 June, 1881 (3rd son of John Musgrave, of Wasdale Hall, Cumberland); born , 1855.
    Wasdale Hall, Camforth.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Musgrave, Henry Yorke

​Musgrave, Henry Yorke, a member of the North Wales and Chester circuit, undergrad. Trin. Hall, Camb., a student of Lincoln's Inn 9 April, 1874 (then aged 20), called to the bar 25 April, 1877 (only son of Thomas Oliver Musgrave, Esq., late of Kendal, dec.); born , 1854.
    4, Elm Court, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Murray, John Edwards

​Murray, John Edwards, equity draftsman and conveyancer, a student of Gray's Inn 28 May, 1833, called to the bar 21 Nov., 1838 (eldest son of Adam Murray, Esq., of Briton Ferry, co. Glamorgan); born , .
# Men-at-the-Bar/Murray, John Rigby

​Murray, John Rigby, B.A., Trin. Coll., Oxon, 1883, a student of the Inner Temple 20 Jan., 1881 (then aged 23), called to the bar 25 June, 1884 (2nd son of Benjamin Rigby Murray, Esq., of Parton, co. Kirkcudbright); born , 1858.
    Parton, co. Kirkcudbright.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Murray, Thomas Douglas

​Murray, Thomas Douglas, undergrad. Exeter Coll., Oxon, a student of Lincoln's Inn 29 Jan., 1863 (then aged 21), called to the bar 6 June, 1866 ( son of Rev. Thomas Boyles Murray, late rector of St. Dunstan's-in-the-East, London, dec.); born , 1842.
    34, Portland Place, W.
# Motif-Index of Folk-Literature/Volume 1/A/800

A800.—A899. The earth.
# Motif-Index of Folk-Literature/Volume 1/B

B. ANIMALS
DETAILED SYNOPSIS
* B000—B99. Mythical animals
* B10. Mythical beasts and hybrids
* B20. Beast-men
* B30. Mythical birds
* B40. Bird-beasts
* B50. Bird-men
* B60. Mythical fish
* B70. Fish-beasts
* B80. Fish-men
* B90. Other mythical animals
* B100—B199. Magic animals
* B100—B119. Treasure animals
* B100. Treasure animals — general
* B110. Treasure-producing parts of animals
* B120—B169. Animals with magic wisdom
* B120. Wise animals
* B130. Truth-telling animals
* B140. Prophetic animals
* B150. Oracular animals
* B160. Wisdom-giving animals
* B170—B189. Other magic animals
* B170. Magic birds, fish, reptiles, etc.
* B180. Magic quadrupeds
* B190. Magic animals: miscellaneous motifs
* B200—B299. Animals with human traits
* B210. Speaking animals
* B220. Animal kingdom (community)
* B230. Parliament of animals
* B240. King of animals
* B250. Religious animals
* B260. Animal warfare
* B270. Animals in legal relations
* B280. Animal weddings
* B290. Other animals with human traits
B300—B599. FRIENDLY ANIMALS
* B300—B349. Helpful animals — general
* B310. Acquisition of helpful animal
* B320. Reward of helpful animal
* B330. Death of helpful animal
* B340. Treatment of helpful animal — miscellaneous
* B350—B399. Grateful animals
* B360. Animals grateful for rescue from peril of death
* B370. Animals grateful to captor for release
* B380. Animals grateful for relief from pain
* B390. Animals grateful for other kind acts ​
* B400—B499. Kinds of helpful animals
* B400—B449. Helpful beasts
* B400. Helpful domestic beasts
* B430. Helpful wild beasts
* B450. Helpful birds
* B470. Helpful fish
* B480. Helpful insects
* B490. Other helpful animals
* B500—B599. Services of helpful animals
* B500. Magic power from animal
* B510. Healing by animal
* B520. Animals save person's life
* B530. Animals nourish men
* B540. Animal rescuer or retriever
* B550. Animals carry men
* B560. Animals advise men
* B570. Animals serve men
* B580. Animals help men to wealth and greatness
* B590. Miscellaneous services of helpful animals
* B600—B699. Marriage of person to animal
* B610. Animal paramour
* B620. Animal suitor
* B630. Offspring of marriage to animal
* B640. Marriage to person in animal form
* B650. Marriage to animal in human form
* B700—B799. Fanciful traits of animals
* B710. Fanciful origin of animals
* B720—B749. Fanciful physical qualities of animals
* B720. Fanciful bodily members of animals
* B730. Fanciful color, smell, etc. of animals
* B740. Fanciful marvelous strength of animals
* B750. Fanciful habits of animals
* B770. Other fanciful traits of animals
* B800—B899. Miscellaneous animal motifs
* B870. Giant animals
# Motif-Index of Folk-Literature/Volume 1/B/0

B. ANIMALS
B0—B99. Mythical animals.
# Motif-Index of Folk-Literature/Volume 1/A/500

A500—A599. Demigods and culture heroes.
# Motif-Index of Folk-Literature/Volume 1/A/900

A900—A999. Topographical features of the earth.
A910—A949. WATER FEATURES
# Motif-Index of Folk-Literature/Volume 1/A/600

A600—A899. COSMOGONY AND COSMOLOGY
A600—A699. The universe.
A600—A649. CREATION OF THE UNIVERSE
A650—A699. NATURE OF THE UNIVERSE