OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Adams v. Conner/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
133 U.S. 296
Adams v. Conner
The regularity of the proceedings of the state court is not challenged. They were all subsequent to the proceedings in the bankrupt court, and were not commenced until after the title had passed away from the assignee in bankruptcy. The general jurisdiction of the state court is conceded. The purchaser, the plaintiff in error, was a party to that suit; and the claim of the plaintiff in error can only be sustained upon the theory that by reason of the bankrupt proceedings the state court was prevented from taking jurisdiction. But the truth is, the question is one of error, nd not of jurisdiction. The state court had jurisdiction of the parties; and they were served with process, and appeared. It had jurisdiction of the foreclosure liens; and it had a right to hear and determine whether the alleged liens still existed, and whether there was any valid defense to their enforcement. The property upon which the liens were claimed was not in the possession of the bankrupt court, but only in the possession of the party purchasing from it. So, whether it erred in deciding that the lienholders had a claim upon the land, rather than upon the fund in the hands of the assignee in bankruptcy, is immaterial. It presented simply a matter of error. An error in its ruling did not oust it of jurisdiction. The error, if error it was, could be corrected only by appeal. The failure of the party to exhaust his remedy in that direction does not now entitle him to disregard the entire proceeding as without jurisdiction. Winchester v. Heiskell, 119 U.S. 450, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 281. We see no error in the ruling of the circuit court, and its judgment is affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Adams v. Crittenden/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
106 U.S. 576
Adams v. Crittenden
This case was submitted under rule 20, but on looking into the record we find that we have no jurisdiction. The suit was begun in equity by an assignee in bankruptcy, and a purchaser of certain lands sold under an order of the bankrupt court, to restrain the defendant Crittenden from enforcing a decree in his favor against the property for $1,828.93, and the defendant Weaver from enforcing another decree in her favor for $2,348.10. The decrees to be enjoined were entirely separate and distinct from each other, one having been rendered in a suit instituted by the defendant Crittenden alone, and the other in a suit by the defendant Weaver. The two suits presented substantially the same questions for adjudication, but they were in all other respects distinct. The two decrees were rendered on the same day, and draw interest from March 6, 1879. The circuit court, in the present suit, on the twenty-fourth of October, 1881, dismissed the bill, and from a decree to that effect this appeal was taken.
The case comes clearly within the rule stated at the present term in Ex parte Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. ante, 35, to the effect that distinct decrees in favor of or against distinct parties cannot be joined to give this court jurisdiction; but if they could, these appellants would be in no better condition, because the aggregate of the two decrees, with interest, added to the date of the dismissal of the bill, is less than $5,000. The mere fact that the matter in dispute arises under the constitution or laws of the United States, or treaties made, does not give us jurisdiction for the review of the judgments or decrees of the circuit or district courts. If the value of the matter in dispute in such cases does not exceed $5,000 we cannot consider them any more than others in which the amount in value is less than our jurisdictional limit.
Dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Adams v. Conner

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
133 U.S. 296
Adams v. Conner
This was an action of ejectment, and was submitted to the trial court upon an agreed statement of facts, which appears in he record. The contest is between a purchaser from an assignee in bankruptcy and a purchaser at subsequent foreclosure proceedings in a state court. The land was incumbered with liens at the time the bankruptcy proceedings were commenced. The title was not in the bankrupt, nor was the property surrendered by him to the assignee. Subsequently, however, the essignee sued the party in whose name the title stood, and recovered the land. Thereafter it was sold by the assignee, and the plaintiff in error became the purchaser. Such sale was for one-third cash, the balance on time; a lien being retained for the deferred payments. Upon this sale a deed was made, and the purchaser put in possession. The lienholders were not made parties to any proceedings in the bankrupt court. They never proved their claims there. After the conveyance by the assignee to the plaintiff in error, these lien owners commenced proceedings in the chancery court of the state to foreclose their liens, making the bankrupt, the assignee in bankruptcy, and the purchaser, among others, parties defendant. The assignee and the purchaser defended on the ground that the state court had no jurisdiction to ascertain and enforce liens upon property of a bankrupt which had passed into the jurisdiction of the bankrupt court, and by it been disposed of; but this defense was overruled, the liens declared, and the land ordered to be sold. An appeal was taken to the supreme court of the state, but it affirmed the decree. Pending the proceedings in the state chancery court, a bill was filed in the United States circuit court to enjoin those proceedings, but, after hearing, that bill was dismissed. After the affirmance by the supreme court of the decree of the chancery court the land was sold, and the defendants in error became the purchasers. Upon such purchase they received the ordinary deed, and were put in possession. Thereupon this action of ejectment was brought.
S. Watson, for plaintiff in error.
Milton Humes, for defendants in error.
BREWER, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Adams v. Crittenden

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
106 U.S. 576
Adams v. Crittenden
James L. Pugh and W. K. McAllister, Jr., for appellants.
David P. Lewis, for appellees.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Adolf Hitler's Proclamation to the Soldiers of the Western Front (10 May 1940)

The hour of the most decisive battle for the future of the German nation has come.
For over 300 years it has been the ambition of British and French rulers to prevent a real consolidation of Europe and, in particular, to keep Germany weak and impotent. To this end, France alone has declared war on Germany thirty-one times in the course of two centuries.
For decades it has also been the ambition of the British rulers of the world to prevent Germany, under all circumstances, from attaining unity while denying the Reich those vital goods necessary to sustain a people of eighty million. England and France have pursued this policy regardless of which regime reigned in Germany at any point in time. Their target was always the German Volk. Men of responsibility in those countries proclaimed this ambition openly.
Germany was to be shattered and dissolved into many small states. Then the Reich would lose its political power and hence its means of securing for the German Volk its vital rights upon this earth. For this reason, all my offers of peace were rejected and war was declared on us on September 3 of last year.
The German Volk harbors neither hatred nor animosity toward either the English or the French people. Today, however, it faces the question whether it desires to live or rather to perish.
Within a few weeks, the valiant troops of our armies have defeated the Polish enemy sent up to the front by Britain and France. Thereby they have eliminated the danger in the East. Consequently, Britain and France determined to assault Germany in the North. Ever since April 9, the Wehrmacht has quelled this attempt from its very beginnings.
Now has come to pass what we have envisioned as a threatening danger throughout the past months. Britain and France aim to push for the Ruhr territory through Holland and Belgium while undertaking a gigantic effort at diversion in southeast Europe.
Soldiers of the Western Front! Your hour has come. The battle beginning on this day will determine the fate of the German nation for the next one thousand years. Now do your duty. The German Volk is with you in its desire for victory.
Adolf Hitler
# Adolf Hitler's Proclamation to the German People (3 September 1939)

Great Britain has for centuries pursued the aim of rendering the peoples of Europe defenceless against the British policy of world conquest by proclaiming a balance of power, in which Great Britain claimed the right to attack on threadbare pretexts and destroy that European State which at the moment seemed most dangerous. Thus, at one time, she fought the world power of Spain, later the Dutch, then the French, and, since 1871, the German.
We ourselves have been witnesses of the policy of encirclement which has been carried on by Great Britain against Germany since before the war. Just as the German nation had begun, under its National Socialist leadership, to recover from the frightful consequences of the Diktat of Versailles, and threatened to survive the crisis, the British encirclement immediately began once more.
The British war inciters spread the lie before the War that the battle was only against the House of Hohenzollern or German militarism; that they had no designs on German colonies; that they had no intention of taking the German mercantile fleet. They then oppressed the German people under the Versailles Diktat the faithful fulfillment of which would have sooner or later exterminated 20 million Germans.
I undertook to mobilize the resistance of the German nation against this, and to assure work and bread for them. But as the peaceful revision of the Versailles Diktat of force seemed to be succeeding, and the German people again began to live, the new British encirclement policy was resumed. The same lying inciters appeared as in 1914. I have many times offered Great Britain and the British people the understanding and friendship of the German people. My whole policy was based on the idea of this understanding. I have always been repelled. I had for years been aware that the aim of these war inciters had for long been to take Germany by surprise at a favourable opportunity.
I am more firmly determined than ever to beat back this attack. Germany shall not again capitulate. There is no sense in sacrificing one life after another and submitting to an even worse Versailles Diktat. We have never been a nation of slaves and will not be one in the future. Whatever Germans in the past had to sacrifice for the existence of our realm, they shall not be greater than those which we are today prepared to make.
This resolve is an inexorable one. It necessitates the most thorough measures, and imposes on us one law above all others: If the soldier is fighting at the front, no one shall profit by the war. If the soldier falls at the front no one at home shall evade his duty.
As long as the German people was united it has never been conquered. It was the lack of unity in 1918 that led to collapse. Whoever offends against this unity need expect nothing else than annihilation as an enemy of the nation. If our people fulfills its highest duty in this sense, that God will help us who has always bestowed His mercy on him who was determined to help himself.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Anderson, Thomas (1)

From volume 1 of the work.
​Anderson, Thomas, 'wheelwright,' privilegiatus, 8 Feb., 1762.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Anderson, William Cliffe Foley

From volume 1 of the work.
​Anderson, William Cliffe Foley, 1s. Samuel, of Upper Falls, co. Antrim, cler. Non-Coll., matric. 28 Jan., 1884, aged 22.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Anderton, John

From volume 1 of the work.
​Anderton, John, s. William, of King's Norton, co. Worcester, gent. Wadham Coll., matric. 20 March, 1807, aged 17, B.A. 1810, M.A. 1813.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Andrew, James (1)

From volume 1 of the work.
​Andrew, James, s. James, of Probus, Cornwall, pleb. Exeter Coll., matric. 23 March, 1737-8, aged 20, B.A. 1741, M.A. 1745, B. & D.D., 1766. Coll. Reg. 101.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Anderson, William

From volume 1 of the work.
​Anderson, William, s. John, of Philpott Lane, London, arm. Exeter Coll., matric. 25 Oct., 1813, aged 16, B.A. St. Mary Hall, 1817, M.A. 1821.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Anderson, William John (2)

From volume 1 of the work.
​Anderson, William John, 2s. George Campbell, of Nassau, Isle of Bahama, arm. (after a knight). Pembroke Coll., matric. 14 Oct., 1865, aged 18, chief justice Turks and Caicos islands, Feb. 1874, called to the bar, Lincoln's Inn, 17 Nov., 1869. See Foster's Men at the Bar.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Andrew, George Frederick

From volume 1 of the work.
​Andrew, George Frederick, 2s. John, of Ashton-upon-Mersey, Cheshire, arm. Brasenose Coll., matric. 12 June, 1855, aged 19.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Anderson, Thomas (2)

From volume 1 of the work.
​Anderson, Thomas, s. John, of Woodford, Essex, arm. Exeter Coll., matric. 6 Nov., 1812, aged 17, B.A. 1816, M.A. 1819, rector of Felsham, Suffolk, 1822, until his death 4 Dec., 1872.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Anderson, Thomas Conyngham

From volume 1 of the work.
​Anderson, Thomas Conyngham, 1s. Thomas, of Dublin (city), gent. Alban Hall, matric. 10 Dec., 1818, aged 24.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Anderson, William John (1)

From volume 1 of the work.
​Anderson, William John, o.s. William, of Paddington, Middlesex, arm. Christ Church, matric. 16 Oct., 1839, aged 18.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Alderson, Sir Edward Hall

From volume 1 of the work.
​Alderson, Sir Edward Hall, created D.C.L. 12 June, 1850, then a baron of the Court of Exchequer 1834-57, B.A. (fellow) Caius Coll., Cambridge, 1809, M.A. 1812 (son of Robert Alderson, recorder of Norwich, etc.).
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Alderson, Edward Hall

From volume 1 of the work.
​Alderson, Edward Hall, 1s. Francis John, of Dunedin, New Zealand, gent. Charsley Hall, matric. 25 Jan., 1884, aged 19.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Alderson, Edward Pakenham

From volume 1 of the work.
​Alderson, Edward Pakenham, 1s. Edward Hall, of London, equitis. Balliol Coll., matric. 19 May, 1847, aged 18, B.A. 1850; died s.p. 1 Dec. 1876.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Alderson, Sir James

From volume 1 of the work.
​Alderson, Sir James, M.A. Pembroke Hall, Cambridge, 1825, 4s. John, of Hull, co. York, doctor, incorp. 3 April, 1826, aged 31, Magdalen Hall, M.B. 1826, M.D. 1829, created D.C.L. 21 June, 1870, then a knight (created 11 Nov., 1869), and president Royal College of Physicians 1867-70, physician extraordinary to the Queen 1874; died 1882.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Alderson, Joseph

From volume 1 of the work.
​Alderson, Joseph, s. Joseph, of Lynn, Norfolk, gent. Brasenose Coll., matric. 6 March, 1779, aged 17, B.A. 1782, M.A. 1785.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Alderson, Richard

From volume 1 of the work.
​Alderson, Richard, M.A. St. John's Coll., Cambridge (B.A. 1708), incorp. 15 July, 1727. Richard Alderson, son of John A., of Selby, bred under Mr. Tomlinson at York School, admitted sizar for Mr. Read 28 May, 1705, aged 17, tutors Messrs. Edmundson and Lambert. St. John's Coll. Reg.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Alderson, Charles Henry

From volume 1 of the work.
​Alderson, Charles Henry, 2s. Edward Hall, of Marylebone, London, eq. aur. Balliol Coll., matric. 13 June, 1849, aged 17, scholar Trinity Coll., 1851, B.A. 1854, M.A. 1856, fellow All Soul's Coll. 1857, second charity commissioner for England and Wales, July, 1885, bar.-at-law Inner Temple, 4 Nov., 1850. See Foster's Men at the Bar.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Alderson, Robert Jervis Coke

From volume 1 of the work.
​Alderson, Robert Jervis Coke, 3s. Robert, of Bungay, Suffolk, arm. Exeter Coll., matric. 27 Nov., 1820, aged 18, B.A. 1825, M.A. 1827, rector of Wetherden, 1844, until his death, 19 Aug., 1868.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Alderson, Christopher

From volume 1 of the work.
​Alderson, Christopher, 2s. Jonathan, of Eckington, co. Derby, cler. Magdalen Hall, matric. 9 July, 1824, aged 21, B.A. 1829, M.A. 1836, rector of Kirkheaton, Yorks, 1836, until his death 11 Sept., 1880.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715-1886/Aldham, Harcourt

From volume 1 of the work.
​Aldham, Harcourt, 2s. George, of Plymouth, Devon, arm. Worcester Coll., matric. 26 April, 1827, aged 18, B.A. 1831, vicar of Stoke Prior, 1842.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Richerd, Roger

From volume 3 of the work.
​Richerd, Roger, s. John, of Langford, Somerset, pleb. Lincoln Coll., matric. 24 Nov., 1637, aged 18; B.A. 3 July, 1641.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Rogers, John (30)

From volume 3 of the work.
​Rogers, John, s. Rich., of Dowdeswell, co. Gloucester, gent. Queen's Coll., matric. 24 Oct., 1707, aged 17; B.A. 1711; the rector of Dowdeswell 1713-68 is said to have been the son of John, of Dowdeswell, in Metcalfe's Gloucestershire Visitation, 1682, p. 146. See also Antony 1706 and Robert 1685.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Richerdsone, Augustine

From volume 3 of the work.
​Richerdsone, Augustine, of Kent, pleb. Magdalen Hall, matric. 8 Nov., 1594, aged 24; B.A. 4 May, 1598.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Rogers, John (28)

From volume 3 of the work.
​Rogers, John, s. Geor., of London, doctoris. St. John's Coll., matric. 14 March, 1703-4, aged 17; student of Gray's Inn 1704; brother of George 1692. See Foster's Gray's Inn Reg.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Richardson, Edward (1)

From volume 3 of the work.
​Richardson, Edward (Rychardson), of Sussex, pleb. Brasenose Coll., matric. 13 Oct., 1598, aged 16; B.A. 9 Feb., 1601-2.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Rogers, John (29)

From volume 3 of the work.
​Rogers, John, s. John, of Atcham, Salop, pleb. Christ Church, matric. 17 Feb., 1704-5, aged 17; B.A. 1709, M.A. 1711; perhaps vicar of Long Staunton, Salop, 1717-34. See Foster's Index Eccl.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Rogers, John (26)

From volume 3 of the work.
​Rogers, John, s. Thom., of Gloucester (city), pleb. Christ Church, matric. 23 April, 1695, aged 17; B.A. 28 Feb., 1698-9, M.A. 1701.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Rogers, John (27)

From volume 3 of the work.
​Rogers, John, s. J(ohn), of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, arm. St. Edmund Hall, matric. 7 Dec., 1702, aged 17; student of Middle Temple 1702. See Foster's Inns of Court Reg.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Richardson, Conyers

From volume 3 of the work.
​Richardson, Conyers, s. William, of Witton, co. Durham, pleb. St. Edmund Hall, matric. 14 Nov., 1661, aged 17, B.A. 1665, M.A. 28 Jan., 1667-8; vicar of West Dean 1679, of Leominster 1688, of Climping 1696, and rector of Ford, all Sussex, 1696. See Foster's Index Eccl.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Rogers, John (25)

From volume 3 of the work.
​Rogers, John, s. Joh., of Eynsham, Oxon, cler. Corpus Christi Coll., matric. 7 Feb., 1693-4, aged 15; B.A. 1697, M.A. 13 March, 1700-1, fellow 1706-16, B.D. 1710, D.D. (by diploma) 7 July, 1721, rector of Wrington, Somerset, 1716, canon of Wells 1719, sub-dean 1721, chaplain in ordinary to George II. 1727 (when Prince of Wales 1726), vicar of St. Giles, Cripplegate, 1728, until his death 1 May, 1729, buried 13th at Eynsham; his father vicar of Eynsham 1665, brother of Robert 1701. See Rawl. i. 132, and xxi. 86; & Foster's Index Eccl.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Hutton, William (Hotton)

From volume 2 of the work.
​Hutton, William (Hotton); B.A. (sup. 20 May), 1508.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Huttonne, William

From volume 2 of the work.
​Huttonne, William; subscribed 15 Oct., 1613; B.A. from St. John's Coll. 15 Dec., 1614; one of these names vicar of Beoley, co. Worcester, 1622. See Foster's Index Eccl.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Huxley, John (2)

From volume 2 of the work.
​Huxley, John, s. J(ohn), of Astley, Salop, gent. Jesus Coll., matric. 1 July, 1689, aged 18; student of Lincoln's Inn 1692. See Foster's Inns of Court# Reg.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Huxley, Thomas (1)

From volume 2 of the work.
​Huxley, Thomas, s. Francis, (subs.) of Brosely, Salop, pleb. Jesus Coll., matric. 22 May, 1663, aged 17; B.A. 1666, M.A. 1669, proctor 1674, B.D. 1677; rector of Blunsdon St. Andrew, Wilts, 1677, of Woodchurch, Kent, 1684; brother of John 1658. See Foster's Index Eccl.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Huxley, Thomas (2)

From volume 2 of the work.
​Huxley, Thomas, s. George, of Brindley, Cheshire, gent. Brasenose Coll., matric. 24 March, 1670-1, aged 15.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Huxley, Timothy

From volume 2 of the work.
​Huxley, Timothy, s. Fr., of Astley Abbat, Salop, pleb. Jesus Coll., matric. 12 Feb., 1674-5, aged 16; B.A. 1678, M.A. 1681, B.D. 1689; rector of Rotherfield Peppard, Oxon, 1697. See Foster's Index Eccl.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Huxtable, John

From volume 2 of the work.
​Huxtable, John, s. Daniel, of Tavistock, Devon, pleb. Broadgates Hall, matric. 23 May, 1623, aged 16; B.A. from Exeter Coll. 22 June, 1626, M.A. 3 June, 1630; rector of Marsh Baldon, Oxon, 1637. See Foster's Index Ecclesiasticus.
# Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714/Hutton, William (2)

From volume 2 of the work.
​Hutton, William, s. Thomas, of St. Kew, Cornwall, sacerd. St. John's Coll., matric. 20 Jan., 1625-6, aged 18; B.C.L. 5 June, 1630, M.A. 9 or 19 July, 1630, rector of North Lew, Devon, 1634, of Jacobstowe, Cornwall, 1640, and of Bridestowe, Devon, 1662; father of Charles 1669. See Foster's Index Eccl.