OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Tristram of Lyonesse and Other Poems/On Lamb’s Specimens of Dramatic Poets

ON LAMB'S SPECIMENS OF DRAMATIC POETS.
I.
By wonder-working summer were made one, Its fragrance were not sweeter in the sun, Its treasure-house of leaves were not more worth Than those wherefrom thy light of musing mirth Shone, till each leaf whereon thy pen would run Breathed life, and all its breath was benison. Beloved beyond all names of English birth, More dear than mightier memories; gentlest name That ever clothed itself with flower-sweet fame, Or linked itself with loftiest names of old By right and might of loving; I, that am Less than the least of those within thy fold, Give only thanks for them to thee, Charles Lamb.
II.
And slain them since thy honey-bees were hived, John Day, in cells of flower-sweet verse contrived So well with craft of moulding melodies, Thy soul perchance in amaranth fields at ease Thought not to hear the sound on earth revived Of summer music from the spring derived When thy song sucked the flower of flowering trees But thine was not the chance of every day: Time, after many a darkling hour, grew sunny, And light between the clouds ere sunset swam, Laughing, and kissed their darkness all away, When, touched and tasted and approved, thy honey Took subtler sweetness from the lips of Lamb.
# Tristram of Lyonesse and Other Poems/On the Russian Persecution of the Jews

Previously printed in The Daily Telegraph, January 25th, 1882.
ON THE RUSSIAN PERSECUTION OF THE JEWS.
O son of man, by lying tongues adored, By slaughterous hands of slaves with feet red-shod In carnage deep as ever Christian trod Profaned with prayer and sacrifice abhorred And incense from the trembling tyrant’s horde, Brute worshippers or wielders of the rod, Most murderous even of all that call thee God, Most treacherous even that ever called thee Lord; Face loved of little children long ago, Head hated of the priests and rulers then, If thou see this, or hear these hounds of thine Run ravening as the Gadarean swine, Say, was not this thy Passion, to foreknow In death’s worst hour the works of Christian men?
Jan. 23, 1882.
# Tristram of Lyonesse and Other Poems/Quia Nominor Leo

Previously printed in The Fortnightly Review, February 1882, p. 155.
QUIA NOMINOR LEO.
I.
Which hadst the world for pasture, and for scope And compass of thine homicidal hope The kingdom of the spirit of man, the feast Of souls subdued from west to sunless east, From blackening north to bloodred south aslope, All servile; earth for footcloth of the pope, And heaven for chancel-ceiling of the priest; Thou that hadst earth by right of rack and rod, Thou that hadst Rome because thy name was God, And by thy creed’s gift heaven wherein to dwell; Heaven laughs with all his light and might above That earth has cast thee out of faith and love; Thy part is but the hollow dream of hell.
II.
High priest of heaven and hell and purgatory: Thy lips are loud with strains of oldworld story, But the red prey was rent out of thy paws Long since: and they that dying brake down thy laws Have with the fires of death-enkindled glory Put out the flame that faltered on thy hoary High altars, waning with the world’s applause. This Italy was Dante’s: Bruno died Here: Campanella, too sublime for pride, Endured thy God’s worst here, and hence went home. And what art thou, that time’s full tide should shrink For thy sake downward? What art thou, to think Thy God shall give thee back for birthright Rome?
January, 1882.
# Tristram of Lyonesse and Other Poems/Sir William Gomm

Previously printed in The Athenæum, January 7th, 1882, p. 16.
SIR WILLIAM GOMM.
I.
To rule in India, forth a soldier went On whose bright-fronted youth fierce war had spent Its iron stress of storm, till glory grew Full as the red sun waned on Waterloo. Landing, he met the word from England sent Which bade him yield up rule: and he, content, Resigned it, as a mightier warrior’s due; And wrote as one rejoicing to record That ‘from the first’ his royal heart was lord Of its own pride or pain; that thought was none Therein save this, that in her perilous strait England, whose womb brings forth her sons so great, Should choose to serve her first her mightiest son.
II.
Go with the warrior’s memory who preferred To praise of men whereby men’s hearts are stirred, And acclamation of his own proud name With blare of trumpet-blasts and sound and flame Of pageant honour, and the titular word That only wins men worship of the herd, His country’s sovereign good: who overcame Pride, wrath, and hope of all high chance on earth, For this land’s love that gave his great heart birth. O nursling of the sea-winds and the sea, Immortal England, goddess ocean-born, What shall thy children fear, what strengths not scorn, While children of such mould are born to thee?
# Tristram of Lyonesse and Other Poems/John Webster

No. 7 of the 'Sonnets on English Dramatic Poets (1590-1650)' series
VII.
JOHN WEBSTER.
Thunder: the flesh quails, and the soul bows down. Night: east, west, south, and northward, very night Star upon struggling star strives into sight, Star after shuddering star the deep storms drown. The very throne of night, her very crown, A man lays hand on, and usurps her right Song from the highest of heaven’s imperious height Shoots, as a fire to smite some towering town. Rage, anguish, harrowing fear, heart-crazing crime, Make monstrous all the murderous face of Time Shown in the spheral orbit of a glass Revolving. Earth cries out from all her graves. Frail, on frail rafts, across wide-wallowing waves, Shapes here and there of child and mother pass.
# Tristram of Lyonesse and Other Poems/Philip Massinger

No. 5 of the 'Sonnets on English Dramatic Poets (1590-1650)' series
V.
PHILIP MASSINGER.
Clouds here and there arisen an hour past noon Chequered our English heaven with lengthening bars And shadow and sound of wheel-winged thunder-cars Assembling strength to put forth tempest soon, When the clear still warm concord of thy tune Rose under skies unscared by reddening Mars Yet, like a sound of silver speech of stars, With full mild flame as of the mellowing moon. Grave and great-hearted Massinger, thy face High melancholy lights with loftier grace Than gilds the brows of revel: sad and wise, The spirit of thought that moved thy deeper song, Sorrow serene in soft calm scorn of wrong, Speaks patience yet from thy majestic eyes.
# United States Kennedy v. Tyler

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
269 U.S. 13
United States Kennedy v. Tyler
Argued: April 21 and 22, 1925. --- Decided: Oct 12, 1925
Mr. George P. Decker, Atty. Gen., for appellants.
Messrs. Albert Ottinger, Atty. Gen., and Edward G. Griffin, Deputy Atty. Gen., for the State of New York.
Messrs. James M. Beck, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., Ira K. Wells, Asst. Atty. Gen., and W. W. Dyar, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.
Mr. Edward G. Griffin, of New York City, for respondent Alice Estella Spring.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Johnson v. Payne/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
253 U.S. 209
United States Johnson v. Payne
Argued: April 29, 1920. --- Decided: June 1, 1920
This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to require the Secretary of the Interior to place the names of the petitioners upon the rolls of the members of the Creek Nation. The petition was dismissed by the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia and the judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. We are not called upon to consider the antecedent facts of the petitioners' case as all that is material can be stated in a few words. Rights as a member of the Nation depend upon the approved rolls. March 4, 1907, was fixed by statute as the time when the rolls were to be completed by the Secretary of the Interior and his previously existing jurisdiction to approve enrollment then ceased. Act of April 26, 1906, c. 1876, § 2, 34 Stat. 137, 138. Before that date the petitioners had on file an application for enrollment, hearings had been had before the proper tribunal, a favorable report had been made to the Secretary and the Secretary had written a letter to the Commissioner to the Five Civilized Tribes, saying, 'Your decision is hereby affirmed.' But on the last day, March 4, 1907, the Secretary addressed another communication to the same official rescinding the former letter to him, and reversing his decision. It was ordered that if the petitioners' names were on the rolls they should be stricken off. The Secretary gave no reasons for his action but it is suggested that he acted under mistakes of law and fact, and it is argued that when the first letter was written the petitioners' rights were fixed.
The last is the only point in the case and with regard to that it is argued that this reversal of the first decision without a hearing was a denial of due process of law. It is not denied that the Secretary might have declined to affirm the decision below in the first instance, and that having been his power, the only question is when it came to an end. While the case was before him he was free to change his mind, and he might do so none the less that he had stated an opinion in favor of one side or the other. He did not lose his power to do the conclusive act, ordering and approving an enrollment, Garfield v. Goldsby, 211 U.S. 249, 29 Sup. Ct. 62, 53 L. Ed. 168, until the act was done. New Orleans v. Paine, 147 U.S. 261, 266, 13 Sup. Ct. 303, 37 L. Ed. 162; Kirk v. Olson, 245 U.S. 225, 228, 38 Sup. Ct. 114, 62 L. Ed. 256. The petitioners' names never were on the rolls. The Secretary was the final judge whether they should be, and they cannot be ordered to be put on now, upon a suggestion that the Secretary made a mistake or that he came very near to giving the petitioners the rights they claim.
Judgment affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Johnson v. Payne

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
253 U.S. 209
United States Johnson v. Payne
Argued: April 29, 1920. --- Decided: June 1, 1920
Mr. Charles H. Merillat, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Assistant Attorney General Nebeker, Charles D. Mahaffie, and C. Edward Wright, all of Washington, D. C., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Johnson v. Shaughnessy

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Reed
United States Supreme Court
336 U.S. 806
United States Johnson v. Shaughnessy
Argued: April 19, 20, 1949. --- Decided: May 9, 1949
Mr. Gunther Jacobson, of New York City, for petitioner.
Patricia H. Collins, for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Knauff v. Shaughnessy

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
338 U.S. 537
United States Knauff v. Shaughnessy
Argued: Dec. 5, 1949. --- Decided: Jan 16, 1950
Mr. Gunther Jacobson, New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Philip R. Monahan, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from page 538 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice MINTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Kansascity Southern Railway Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
252 U.S. 178
United States Kansascity Southern Railway Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Argued: December 10, 1919. --- Decided: March 8, 1920
Messrs. Louis Marshall, of New York City, Samuel W. Moore, of Kansas City, Mo., and Frank W. Swacker, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Patrick J. Farrell, of Washington, D. C., for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 179-182 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
381 U.S. 657
United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington
Argued: Jan. 27, 1965. --- Decided: June 7, 1965
[Syllabus from pages 657-658 intentionally omitted]
Harrison Combs, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
John A. Rowntree, Knoxville, Tenn., for respondents.
Theodore J. St. Antoine, Washington, D.C., for American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, as amicus curiae.
Mr. Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Act

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United Nations Act."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.

## 1946

* United Nations Act, 1946 (United Kingdom), an UK Act of Parliament provides for the implementation of Article 41 of the Charter of the United Nations.
* United Nations Act, 1946 (New Zealand), a New Zealand Act of Parliament that provides for similar measures.

## See also

* United Nations Participation Act of 1945 (PL 108-333, 59 Stat. 619)
* United Nations (Security Council) Act, 1947 (Act 43 of 1947) (India)
# United Mine Workers of America v. Railing

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
401 U.S. 486
United Mine Workers of America v. Railing, et al., DBA C & P Coal Co.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
No. 1059 Argued: N/A --- Decided: March 22, 1971
Case remanded for further consideration, in light of Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, ante, p. 321, of questions involving accrual of causes of action under § 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act and § 4 of the Clayton Act.
Certiorari granted; 429 F. 2d 780, vacated and remanded.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Mine Workers of America v. Railing/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
401 U.S. 486
United Mine Workers of America v. Railing
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., 401 U.S. 321, 91 S.Ct. 795, 28 L.Ed.2d 77. Both § 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, 61 Stat. 158, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 187, and § 4 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 15, give a cause of action for injury to business or property. Whether suits under the two statutes are distinguishable for purposes of determining the time at which a cause of action accrues warrants further exploration by the Court of Appeals. Further attention should also be given to the question of why a § 303 cause of action has sufficiently accrued to bring suit as soon as the plaintiff suffers damage but has not sufficiently accrued to start the running of the statute of limitations on the damages already suffered and for which suit may be but is not brought.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice HARLAN would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari and set the case for argument on the merits.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Under the Shadow of Kiley's Hill

This is the place where they all were bred; Some of the rafters are standing still; Now they are scattered and lost and dead, Every one from the old nest fled, Out of the shadow of Kiley's Hill.
Better it is that they ne'er came back -- Changes and chances are quickly rung; Now the old homestead is gone to rack, Green is the grass on the well-worn track Down by the gate where the roses clung.
Gone is the garden they kept with care; Left to decay at its own sweet will, Fruit trees and flower-beds eaten bare, Cattle and sheep where the roses were, Under the shadow of Kiley's Hill.
Where are the children that strove and grew In the old homestead in days gone by? One is away on the far Barcoo Watching his cattle the long year through, Watching them starve in the droughts and die.
One, in the town where all cares are rife, Weary with troubles that cramp and kill, Fain would be done with the restless strife, Fain would go back to the old bush life, Back to the shadow of Kiley's Hill.
One is away on the roving quest, Seeking his share of the golden spoil; Out in the wastes of the trackless west, Wandering ever he gives the best Of his years and strength to the hopeless toil.
What of the parents? That unkempt mound Shows where they slumber united still; Rough is their grave, but they sleep as sound Out on the range as in holy ground, Under the shadow of Kiley's Hill.
This work is in the public domain in Australia because it was created in Australia and the term of copyright has expired. According to Australian Copyright Council - Duration of Copyright, the following works are public domain:
* published non-government works whose author died before January 1, 1955,
* anonymous or pseudonymous works and photographs published before January 1, 1955, and
* government works published more than 50 years ago (before January 1, 1974).
This work is also in the public domain in the United States because it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days), and it was first published before 1989 without complying with U.S. copyright formalities (renewal and/or copyright notice) and it was in the public domain in Australia on the URAA date (January 1, 1996). This is the combined effect of Australia having joined the Berne Convention in 1928, and of 17 USC 104A with its critical date of January 1, 1996.
Because the Australian copyright term in 1996 was 50 years, the critical date for copyright in the United States under the URAA is January 1, 1946.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 1774

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 5741st meeting, on 14 September 2007
The Security Council,
Recalling its resolution 1505 (2003) of 4 September 2003,
Having regard to Article 15 (4) of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) as adopted by the Council in its resolution 1503 (2003),
Having considered the nomination by the Secretary-General of Mr. Hassan Bubacar Jallow for reappointment as Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (S/2007/539),
Recalling that resolution 1503 (2003) of 28 August 2003 called upon the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda to take all possible measures to complete all trial activities at first instance by the end of 2008, and to complete all work in 2010 (ICTR completion strategy),
Recalling also its resolution 1534 (2004) of 26 March 2004 which emphasized the importance of fully implementing the International Tribunal’s completion strategy and urges the Tribunal to plan and act accordingly,
Decides to reappoint Mr. Hassan Bubacar Jallow as Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda with effect from 15 September 2007 for a four-year term, which is subject to an earlier termination by the Security Council upon completion of the work of the International Tribunal.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 178

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 1033rd meeting, unanimously, on 24 April 1963
The Security Council,
Having heard the statements of the representatives of Senegal and Portugal concerning violations of Senegalese territory by the Portuguese military forces,
Deploring the incidents that have occurred near the frontier between Senegal and Portuguese Guinea,
Noting with concern that the state of relations in this area between the two parties concerned may lead to tension on the occasion of any incident, and expressing the hope that such tension will be eliminated in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations,
Taking note of the declared intention of the Portuguese Government scrupulously to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Senegal,
1. Deplores any incursion by Portuguese military forces into Senegalese territory as well as the incident which occurred at Bouniak on 8 April 1963;
2. Requests the Government of Portugal, in accordance with its declared intentions, to take whatever action may be necessary to prevent any violation of Senegal's sovereignty and territorial integrity;
3. Requests the Secretary-General to keep the development of the situation under review.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse