OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States v. Ballard

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Ballard."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Ballard (81 U.S. 457)
* United States v. Ballard (322 U.S. 78)
See also Ballard v. United States.
# United States v. Balint

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
258 U.S. 250
United States v. Balint
Argued: March 7, 1922. --- Decided: March 27, 1922
Mr. Wm. C. Herron, of Washington, D. C., for the United states.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Ballard (322 U.S. 78)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States v. Ballard, 322 U.S. 78 (1944), was an appeal of the conviction of two leaders of the new religious "I AM" Activity movement for fraudulently seeking and collecting donations on the basis of religious claims that the defendants themselves did not believe. The United States Supreme Court held that the question of whether the defendants believed their religious claims should not have been submitted to a jury. The Court arrived at this conclusion in part because the "freedom of religious belief... embraces the right to maintain theories of life and of death and of the hereafter which are rank heresy to followers of the orthodox faiths." Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Dissenting Opinions

    Stone
    Jackson
United States Supreme Court
322 U.S. 78
United States v. Ballard (322 U.S. 78)
Argued: March 3 and 6, 1944. --- Decided: April 24, 1944
Mr. Charles Fahy, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Messrs. Roland Rich Woolley and Joseph F. Rank, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. California (381 U.S. 139)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
381 U.S. 139
United States v. California (381 U.S. 139)
Argued: Dec. 7 and 8, 1964. --- Decided: May 17, 1965
[Syllabus from pages 139-141 intentionally omitted]
Archibald Cox, Sol. Gen., for plaintiff.
Richard H. Keatinge, San Marino, Cal., for defendant.
George N. Hayes, Anchorage, Alaska, for State of Alaska, as amicus curiae, by special leave of Court.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. California (342 U.S. 891)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
342 U.S. 891
United States v. California (342 U.S. 891)
Attorney General McGrath, Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Vanech, Messrs. Oscar H. Davis, John F. Davis and Robert M. Vaughan, for the United States.
Messrs. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, and Everett W. Mattoon, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant.
The order of February 12, 1949, appointing William H. Davis, Esquire, of New York City, Special Master herein, is continued and he is directed to conduct hearings and to submit to this Court with all convenient speed his recommended answers to the following questions, with a view to securing from this Court an order for his further guidance in applying the proper principles of law to the seven coastal segments enumerated in Groups I and II of the Master's Report of May 31, 1949, ordered filed June 27, 1949, pp. 1 and 2 of said Report:
Question 1.-What is the status (inland waters or open sea) of particular channels and other water areas between the mainland and offshore islands, and, if inland waters, then by what criteria are the inland water limits of any such channel or other water area to be determined?
Question 2.-Are particular segments in fact bays or harbors constituting inland waters and from what landmarks are the lines marking the seaward limits of bays, harbors, rivers, and other inland waters to be drawn?
Question 3.-By what criteria is the ordinary low water mark on the coast of California to be ascertained?
In holding hearings, the master is authorized to exclude such evidence as he may deem immaterial or unduly cumulative in arriving at his recommendations. Each party may make proffer or any part of such excluded evidence in written form to this Court. Excluded evidence so proffered shall accompany the record of proceedings upon which the Master acted, but shall not be a part of that record.
Mr. Justice JACKSON and Mr. Justice CLARK took no part in the consideration or decision of this question.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. California (342 U.S. 891)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
342 U.S. 891
United States v. California (342 U.S. 891)
Mr. Justice BLACK is of the opinion that the case should be set for argument with a view to narrowing and making more precise the issues upon which evidence is to be heard.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. California (332 U.S. 804)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
332 U.S. 804
United States v. California (332 U.S. 804)
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. California Bridge & Construction Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
245 U.S. 337
United States v. California Bridge & Construction Company
Argued: Nov. 9 and 12, 1917. --- Decided: Dec 10, 1917
Mr. George A. King, of Washington, D. C., for Bridge Co.
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Thompson, for the United States.
Mr. Justice CLARKE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. California (382 U.S. 448)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
382 U.S. 448
United States v. California (382 U.S. 448)
Solicitor General Marshall, Louis F. Claiborne and George S. Swarth, for the United States.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, Jay L. Shavelson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richard H. Keatinge, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., and Warren J. Abbott and N. Gregory Taylor, Deputy Attys. Gen., for the State of California.
Supplemental Decree.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walling v. Reuter

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
321 U.S. 671
Walling v. Reuter
Argued: March 10, 1944. --- Decided: April 10, 1944
Mr. Douglas B. Maggs, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Frank S. Normann, of New Orleans, La., for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
317 U.S. 564
Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Company
Argued: Nov. 19, 20, 1942. --- Decided: Jan 18, 1943
Mr. Robert L. Stern, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Louis Kurz, of Jacksonville, Fla., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walling v. United States (330 U.S. 148)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
330 U.S. 148
Walling v. United States
Argued: Jan. 17, 1947. --- Decided: Feb 17, 1947
Mr. William S. Tyson of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. E. Spencer Miller, of Portland, Mc., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walling v. United States (330 U.S. 158)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
330 U.S. 158
Walling v. United States (330 U.S. 158)
Argued: Jan. 17, 1947. --- Decided: Feb 17, 1947
Mr. William S. Tyson, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Walton Whitwell, of Nashville, Tenn., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walling v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Walling v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Walling v. United States (330 U.S. 148)
* Walling v. United States (330 U.S. 158)
* Walling v. United States (331 U.S. 17)
# United States Reports/Volume 26

1 Pet.[ers], ( 7 L.Ed. )
* 26 U.S. 1 (1828) Clement Hunt v. Christopher Rhodes
* 26 U.S. 18 (1828) Carroll v. Peake
* 26 U.S. 25 (1828) The President and Directors of the Bank of Washington v. Triplett & Neale
* 26 U.S. 37 (1828) Gaither v. The Farmers and Mechanics Bank of Georgetown
* 26 U.S. 46 (1828) Minor v. The Mechanics Bank of Alexandria
* 26 U.S. 89 (1828) Brent v. The Bank of the Metropolis
* 26 U.S. 94 (1828) Hickie v. Starke
* 26 U.S. 100 (1828) United States v. The Saline Bank of Virginia
* 26 U.S. 105 (1828) Rhea v. Rhenner
* 26 U.S. 110 (1828) The Governor of Georgia v. Juan Mardazo
* 26 U.S. 136 (1828) Joseph Mandeville v. George Holey
* 26 U.S. 138 (1828) Greenleaf v. Queen
* 26 U.S. 151 (1828) Hedrick v. The Chesapeake Insurance Company
* 26 U.S. 165 (1828) Robertson v. The Lessee of Levi Hollingsworth and John Kaighn
* 26 U.S. 170 (1828) Coiron v. The Universal Insurance Company
* 26 U.S. 193 (1828) Pettit v. Vasse
* 26 U.S. 222 (1828) Karthaus v. Yllas
* 26 U.S. 232 (1828) Horsburg v. Baker
* 26 U.S. 238 (1828) Shultz v. The Bank of the State of Georgia
* 26 U.S. 241 (1828) Findlay v. Hinde
* 26 U.S. 248 (1828) Meredith v. M'Kee
* 26 U.S. 250 (1828) Konig v. Bayard
* 26 U.S. 264 (1828) Gerrit Schimmelpennich and Jan Adrian Toe Lear Who Are Aliens v. William Bayard
* 26 U.S. 293 (1828) Parker v. United States
* 26 U.S. 299 (1828) The Mechanics Bank of Alexandria v. Seton
* 26 U.S. 311 (1828) Barry v. Foyles
* 26 U.S. 318 (1828) Dox v. The Postmaster-General of the United States
* 26 U.S. 328 (1828) Ellott v. The Lessee of Peirsol
* 26 U.S. 343 (1828) Lessee of Spratt v. Spratt
* 26 U.S. 351 (1828) Montgomery Bell v. Taylor
* 26 U.S. 376 (1828) The Mechanics Bank of Alexandria v. Lynn
* 26 U.S. 386 (1828) Conard v. The Atlantic Insurance Company New York
* 26 U.S. 455 (1828) The President Directors and Company of the Bank of Columbia v. Hagner
* 26 U.S. 469 (1828) Doe on the Demise of John Elmore v. Beatie
* 26 U.S. 476 (1828) D'Wole v. Jacques
* 26 U.S. 503 (1828) Davis v. Mason
* 26 U.S. 511 (1828) The American Insurance Company and the Ocean Insurance Company v. 356 Bales of Cotton
* 26 U.S. 547 (1828) United States v. 422 Casks of Wine
* 26 U.S. 552 (1828) Steele's Lessee v. Spencer
* 26 U.S. 562 (1828) Nicholls v. Hodges
* 26 U.S. 567 (1828) The Bank of Columbia v. Sweeny
* 26 U.S. 570 (1828) Waring v. Medcef Eden
* 26 U.S. 573 (1828) United States v. Morgan
* 26 U.S. 578 (1828) The Bank of Columbia Use of the Bank of the United States v. Lawrence
* 26 U.S. 585 (1828) Archer v. Deneale
* 26 U.S. 591 (1828) Tayloe v. Riggs
* 26 U.S. 604 (1828) Waddle v. The President Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States
* 26 U.S. 620 (1828) M'Donald v. Smalley
* 26 U.S. 626 (1828) McArthur v. Porter's Lessee
* 26 U.S. 628 (1828) Anderson v. Clark
* 26 U.S. 640 (1828) Barry v. Coombe
* 26 U.S. 655 (1828) Ross v. Doe
* 26 U.S. 670 (1828) Executors of Pray v. Heath
* 26 U.S. 683 (1828) Swann v. Brown
* 26 U.S. 686 (1828) Wilkins v. Wilkins
# United States Reports/Volume 259

* 259 U.S. 1 (1922) British Columbia Mills Tug Barge Company v. Mylroie
* 259 U.S. 13 (1922) Atherton Mills v. Johnston
* 259 U.S. 16 (1922) Bailey v. George
* 259 U.S. 20 (1922) Child Labor Tax Case
* 259 U.S. 44 (1922) Hill v. Wallace
* 259 U.S. 75 (1922) American Smelting Refining Company v. United States
* 259 U.S. 80 (1922) Grogan v. Hiram Walker & Sons Anchor Line
* 259 U.S. 97 (1922) South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Company v. City of Newport
* 259 U.S. 101 (1922) Newton v. Consolidated Gas Company of New York
* 259 U.S. 107 (1922) Union Tool Company v. Wilson
* 259 U.S. 114 (1922) Heald v. District of Columbia
* 259 U.S. 125 (1922) Pierce Oil Corporation v. Phoenix Refining Company
* 259 U.S. 129 (1922) Ewert v. Bluejacket
* 259 U.S. 139 (1922) Kendall v. Ewert
* 259 U.S. 156 (1922) Continental Insurance Company v. United States
* 259 U.S. 182 (1922) Industrial Accident Commission of California v. Payne
* 259 U.S. 188 (1922) Morrisdale Coal Company v. United States
* 259 U.S. 191 (1922) Pine Hill Coal Company v. United States
* 259 U.S. 197 (1922) Santa Fe Pacific Company v. Payne
* 259 U.S. 200 (1922) Federal Base Ball Club of Baltimore v. National League of Professional Base Ball Clubs
* 259 U.S. 209 (1922) Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York v. Liebing
* 259 U.S. 214 (1922) United States v. Southern Pacific Company
* 259 U.S. 247 (1922) Miles v. Safe Deposit & Trust Company of Baltimore
* 259 U.S. 255 (1922) Carlisle Packing Company v. Sandanger
* 259 U.S. 260 (1922) Olin v. Kitzmiller
* 259 U.S. 263 (1922) State Industrial Commission of New York v. Nordenholt Corporation
* 259 U.S. 276 (1922) Ng Fung Ho v. White
* 259 U.S. 285 (1922) Great Northern Railway Company v. Merchants' Elevator Company
* 259 U.S. 296 (1922) Fidelity Deposit Company of Maryland v. United States
* 259 U.S. 304 (1922) Fidelity Title Trust Company Pittsburgh v. United States
* 259 U.S. 309 (1922) Collins v. Loisel
* 259 U.S. 318 (1922) City of Houston v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
* 259 U.S. 326 (1922) United States ex rel. French v. Weeks
* 259 U.S. 336 (1922) United States ex rel. Creary v. Weeks
* 259 U.S. 344 (1922) United Mine Workers of America v. Coronado Coal Company
* 259 U.S. 414 (1922) Harley-Davidson Motor Company v. Buffington
* 259 U.S. 419 (1922) Wyoming v. Colorado
* 259 U.S. 498 (1922) Weiland v. Pioneer Irrigation Company
* 259 U.S. 503 (1922) Ward Gow v. Krinsky
* 259 U.S. 530 (1922) Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Cheek
* 259 U.S. 548 (1922) Chicago Railway Company v. Perry
* 259 U.S. 557 (1922) Lipke v. Lederer
* 259 U.S. 565 (1922) Oklahoma v. Texas
* 259 U.S. 572 (1922) Georgia v. South Carolina
# Verses (Shorter)/Monica

From Verses (1893).
MONICA.
Pardon give to Monica, She is so very fair— Though soft eyes give promises Rosy lips forswear. From the shy droop of her head, You a hope might take; In the hiding cheek, beware, The dainty dimples wake. Pardon give to Monica.
Pardon give to Monica, The havoc of her eyes, Yours they will not shun or seek,— There the mischief lies. If the flirting lashes thus Make your day and night, Would the loosing of your bonds Give your heart respite? Pardon give to Monica.
Pardon give to Monica, She is so very fair. What those cruel lips may say, Roguish eyes forswear. What knight's heart amid ye all Were not glad to break. That the lips with pity droop, While eyes their laughter take? Pardon give to Monica.
# Verses (Shorter)/Love in My Arms Lies Sleeping

From Verses (1893).
LOVE IN MY ARMS LIES SLEEPING.
Roses red for the fair young head to weave a crown, Let them be half blown, For a rose in June it will fade too soon to gold and brown. For thee my own The fairest blossoms in all love's land, for that small hot and, And a bird to sing all the sweet day through, Lest fear should wake in the heart of you, And I hear my own heart's beating; Wild roses red for the fair gold head. Love in my arms lies sleeping.
Lilies fair for the wind-blown hair, It were better so Than a blossom dead. And a rose's thorn; but the fresh glad morn brings breath of snow. Hath summer fled?
Hath winter come when I dreamt it spring? Is my sweet bird dead that he does not sing? I hear but my heart's sad weeping. Loose and cold is thy soft hands' hold; Love in my arms lies sleeping.
# Verses (Shorter)/One Who Is Dead

From Verses (1893).
ONE WHO IS DEAD.
Never again, my darling, never again, Till the gates of God are open for me to pass, May we join our parted hands that loosed their hold, Ere Death's cold fingers closed on thine. Alas! Feeling palm from palm was slipping in finger's hold, Had you but spoken or I shed a tear. This had not been, but now you have forgot, And I remember only I held you dear.
# Verses (Shorter)/Little White Rose

From Verses (1893).
LITTLE WHITE ROSE.
Little white rose that I loved, I loved, Roisin ban, Roisin ban! Fair my bud as the morning's dawn. I kissed my beautiful flower to bloom, My heart grew glad for its rich perfume— Little white rose that I loved.
Little white rose that I loved grew red, Roisin ruad, Roisin ruad! Passionate tears I wept for you. Love is more sweet than the world's fame— I dream you back in my heart the same, Little white rose that I loved!
Little white rose that I loved grew black, Roisin dub, Roisin dub! So I knew not the heart of you. Lost in the world's alluring fire, I cry in the night for my heart's desire, Little white rose that I loved!
# Verses (Shorter)/My Darling

From Verses (1893).
MY DARLING.
My darling laughed in the dawning, And the birds perched low to hear. The quick sprung anew from dead ashes That Spring's passing feet had flung clear. Oh, Life came over the meadows, And the song of her coming was sweet; The streams leaped joy-mad down the mountains, Flowers bloomed 'neath her dawning feet. The trees bent their branches fruit-laden, So low as her soft hands' hold; And the harvest rose up like an army Of kings in their harness of gold. Oh, Life came over the meadows From her home behind the sun; No mind could guess whence her being. Where she went when her work was done. As she danced, danced Death the cold shadow That was cast by her body so fair.
My darling laughed in the dawning, Lifers hand on her sunny hair.
My darling slept in the dawning, Then came to my heart a fear; For peace may be lost in the darkness. And joy be drowned in a tear. I whispered : ‘Sleep in the singing, When the buds are breaking to bloom. Each branch with its load low-swinging, Each flower with its faint perfume; When the world is young with laughter, Mankind on his throne a king. When the soul sings of a Hereafter, And is not ashamed to sing.’ Then Life faded into her shadow. And Death took her form and was fair. My darling smiled in her sleeping, Death's hand on her sunny hair.
# Verses (Shorter)/One Day in December

From Verses (1893).
ONE DAY IN DECEMBER.
‘Every dog has his day.’ Well, dear, do you remember. How you and I found a golden day In the midst of a bleak December?
You smiled at the chance of our meeting, I blushed as I turned away, While our little world stood by in amaze, With hands upheld in dismay.
We loosed the chain of our little boat, And each took an oar in hand. You spoke no word, but you looked at me, And we rowed for love's sweet land.
You said, ‘All earth's beauties I see in your face.’ I said, ‘All earth's music you're speaking.’ And the keel of our little craft grated the while On the silvery strand of our seeking.
You looked at me and I smiled on you— (O sweet! it was golden weather)— Then we laughed as the boat glided back from the shore And we pulled from the land together.
For you thought, perhaps, of another face, And I—let pass, you remember, Not half we said on that summer's day We found in a bleak December.
# Verses (Shorter)/Lady Kathleen

From Verses (1893).
LADY KATHLEEN.
Fair Lady Kathleen in her tower
Bowed her head like a wounded flower;
Wept she the weary night away;
‘Here I spin for a year and a day,
But ’tis for love’s sweet sake,’ she said,
‘My heart must break and I were dead.
The nettle I’ve pulled when the moon was bright
And brought it home in the dark of night —
I’ve trod it soft ’neath my naked feet
To make a cloak for thy rescue, Sweet!’ The Lady Kathleen wept full sore:
‘Oh, misery mine for a year and more!’
Day after day, and a promised spring
Bloomed into a summer of blossoming.
A thrush was carolling, mad with glee.
On the topmost bough of the elm-tree;
He sang to fair Kathleen in her tower,
But the maiden heeded nor bird nor flower.
The daisies white and the sweet wild rose
Clad mead and hedge in their summer snows.
Fair Lady Kathleen wept alway:
‘Oh, misery mine for a year and a day!’
A ghostly moon in a steel cold sky,
A dance of leaves by the wind swept by,
Like the mirthless rushing of phantom feet.
But the Lady Kathleen murmured: ‘Sweet!
Love keeps a woman’s summer young.’ She sped without fear in the awe of night,
Though the shuddering shadows would stay her flight
With the thought of a horror unknown,
Or a streamlet would laugh ’neath the hedge unshown; But Lady Kathleen wept no more:
‘Oh, joy is mine, for my trial’s o’er!’
To the white thorn-tree on the fairy rath
The Lady Kathleen quick took her path,
Till she stood in the midst of the elfin host.
Like a lily pale or a fair white ghost.
Loud the fairies laughed in their mad retreat.
As she found her love with a whispered ‘Sweet!
It were no sorrow to lose for you
Youth’s golden days or weep long nights through.’
But he said: ‘My love she had golden hair —
Her hands, her feet, they were lily-fair:
So you can never be love of mine.’
‘O Love!’ she cried, ‘if I am not thine,
My hands grew hard as they wove for thee
The magic cloak that hath set thee free.
My face grew sad, and my hair grew white,
In the silent horror of many a night.
And what shall I now that hope’s beacon-glow
Is quenched, and my heart sinks with gloom and woe?
Thy love,’ she cried, ‘be she lily- fair
As the fruit-tree’s bloom that may never bear,
Thou hungeredst — to fruit the blossom came:
Thus youth was lost and thus beauty slain.
Thy Sweet was fair as the page unwrit
Till Love’s strong hand traced his name on it.
Then, O my dear, if thou canst not see
This sorrow cometh from love of thee,
Be blind awhile with a rising tear.
And thou wilt find that thy love is here.’
But ah for woman whose heart is strong
To weary never and love too long!
And what is life to a heart denied?
Fair Lady Kathleen drooped and died.