OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Atlantis Arisen

A revised edition of Fuller's 1872 book All Over Oregon and Washington, per this obituary.
Atlantis Arisen
FRANCES FULLER VICTOR
Page 55.
ATLANTIS ARISEN;
OR,
TALKS OF A TOURIST
ABOUT
OREGON AND WASHINGTON.
BY
MRS. FRANCES FULLER VICTOR.
ILLUSTRATED.
PHILADELPHIA.
J. B. LIPPINCOTT COMPANY.
1891.
Copyright 1891, by Frances Fuller Victor
Printed by J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia.
PREFACE.
Whoever reads my book will discover that the author is no hasty observer. In fact, I have been up and down the coast a good deal, and have studied it from many points of view, from Mexico to British Columbia. I have, during different periods of residence in the East, had occasion to notice and to regret the want of knowledge of this northwest corner of the United States, and some years ago published "All over Oregon and Washington," which is now not only out of print, but out of date, owing to the immense strides in improvement made by these two commonwealths since the era of railroads.
It was frequently suggested to me to revise and republish that book, but upon devoting a summer of travel to the acquisition of new facts, I found that practically a new book would have to be written. This is here presented. If readers of the former detect some familiar passages, they are those I found necessary to preserve, because I did not see how they could be omitted without injustice to my subject. To the majority I have little doubt that the whole will be what I have meant it to be,—instructive.
CONTENTS.
PAGE
CHAPTER I.
CHAPTER II.
CHAPTER III.
CHAPTER IV.
CHAPTER V.
CHAPTER VI.
CHAPTER VII.
CHAPTER VIII.
CHAPTER IX.
CHAPTER X.
CHAPTER XI.
CHAPTER XII.
CHAPTER XIII.
CHAPTER XIV.
CHAPTER XV.
CHAPTER XVI.
CHAPTER XVII.
CHAPTER XVIII.
CHAPTER XIX.
CHAPTER XX.
CHAPTER XXI.
CHAPTER XXII.
CHAPTER XXIII.
CHAPTER XXIV.
CHAPTER XXV.
CHAPTER XXVI.
CHAPTER XXVII.
CHAPTER XXVIII.
CHAPTER XXIX.
CHAPTER XXX.
CHAPTER XXXI.
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
PAGE
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantis (Smith)

Above its domes the gulfs accumulate. Far up, the sea-gales blare their bitter screed: But here the buried waters take no heed— Deaf, and with welded lips pressed down by weight Of the upper ocean. Dim, interminate, In cities over-webbed with somber weed, Where galleons crumble and the krakens breed, The slow tide coils through sunken court and gate.
From out the ocean's phosphor-starry dome, A ghostly light is dubitably shed On altars of a goddess garlanded With blossoms of some weird and hueless vine; And, wingéd, fleet, through skies beneath the foam, Like silent birds the sea-things dart and shine.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1961, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 62 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Arndt v. Griggs

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
134 U.S. 316
Arndt v. Griggs
W. J. Lamb and Ricketts & Wilson, for plaintiffs in error. [317]
N. K. Griggs, for defendant in error.
BREWER, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Arnett v. Reade

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
220 U.S. 311
Arnett v. Reade
Argued: March 13 and 14, 1911. --- Decided: April 3, 1911
Messrs. N. C. Frenger and Clifford S. Walton for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 311-314 intentionally omitted]
Mr. J. H. Paxton for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 314-318 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Army releases new interrogation manual

The first published article on the website of the United States Army. Article No. 1. (source)
Army releases new interrogation manual
By ARNEWSSeptember 8, 2006
WASHINGTON (Army News Service, Sept. 6, 2006) - The Army announced today the publication of Field Manual 2-22.3, "Human Intelligence Collector Operations."
The new manual replaces Field Manual 34-52, which was published in 1992 and focused entirely on interrogation operations. The new FM 2-22.3 is broader in scope and provides plainly worded doctrinal guidance across the full range of human intelligence collection operations.
"FM 2-22.3 is an important part of the Army's commitment to improve human intelligence (HUMINT) operations, including interrogation operations. It broadens the functions and capabilities of our HUMINT Soldiers and incorporates lessons learned into our doctrine," said Lt. Gen. John F. Kimmons, the Army's Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence. "This FM represents the result of a very extensive coordination process throughout the Department of Defense involving our most senior leaders and combatant commanders."
The new manual clarifies military intelligence and military police roles and responsibilities; specifies requirements for non-DoD access to detainees under DoD control; specifies that commanders are responsible and accountable for compliance with provisions of FM 2-22.3 and for ensuring humane detainee treatment; and notes that all military personnel are responsible and accountable for immediately reporting suspected detainee abuse.
The new manual, in accordance with Geneva Conventions, explicitly prohibits torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, and is in complete compliance with the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005.
"The new FM builds upon previous doctrine, incorporates lessons learned, and provides clear and specific guidance to commanders and Soldiers in the field on the conduct of HUMINT operations," said Thomas Gandy, director of Counterintelligence, Human Intelligence, Foreign Disclosure and Security.
Effective human intelligence and interrogation operations are more important than ever to meet the intelligence requirements of our forces operating for extended periods in complex, irregular warfare environments, he added.
The U.S. Army has published this Field Manual in the interest of full transparency. The "FOUO" markings are no longer operative.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Arndstein v. McCarthy

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
254 U.S. 71
Arndstein v. McCarthy
Argued: Oct. 21, 22, 1920. --- Decided: Nov 8, 1920
Messrs. Rufus S. Day, of Washington, D. C., and William J. Fallon, of White Plains, N. Y., for appellant.
Mr. Solicitor General Frierson, for appellee.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Army of the East, General Orders II

Orders given August 1, 1799. As published in C.H. Gifford's 1817 book History of the Wars occasioned by the French Revolution.
The name of Aboukir was fatal to all Frenchmen. The 25th of July has rendered it glorious. The victory which the army has gained accelerates its return to Europe.
We have conquered Mentz, and the limits of the Rhine, by invading a part of Germany. We have now re-conquered our establishments in India, and those of our allies, by a single operation. We have put into the hands of government the power to force England, notwithstanding its maritime triumphs, to a peace glorious for the republic.
We have suffered much; we have had to fight enemies of every kind; we have them still to conquer; but, at length, the result will be worthy of you, and we shall merit the thanks of our country.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Arkansas Southern Railroad Company v. German National Bank

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
207 U.S. 270
Arkansas Southern Railroad Company v. German National Bank
Argued: November 14, 15, 1907. --- Decided: December 2, 1907
Mr. Edward B. Peirce for plaintiffs in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 271 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. John Fletcher, W. C. Ratcliffe, Moore, Smith, & Moore, and Smead & Powell for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 272 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Arkansas Railroad Commission v. Chicago, Rock Island, & Pacific Railroad Company

Supreme Court of the United States
274 U.S. 597
ARKANSAS RAILROAD COMMISSION ET AL. v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
No. 549. Argued: April 20 1927. --- Decided: May 31, 1927.
1. Failure to set forth the reasons for issuing an injunction, as required by § 19 of the Act of October 15, 1914, is improper but does not invalidate the decree. P. 598.
2. A decree of the District Court setting aside an order of a state railroad commission concerning rates should be supported by an opinion stating fully the reasons. P. 603.
3. An order of the Interstate Commerce Commission requiring that certain intrastate rates should not be lower than corresponding interstate rates thereby established is not authority for further increasing the intrastate rates to meet higher interstate rates prescribed in subsequent proceedings wherein the commission considered the propriety of ordering such increase but refused to do so, the commission having, in effect, construed the earlier order as confined to the rates established in the earlier case. P. 602.
4. Where there is a serious doubt whether an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission extends to intrastate rates, the doubt should be resolved in favor of the state power. P. 603.
Reversed.
Appeal from a final decree of the District Court enjoining an order of the Arkansas Railroad Commission which suspended an intrastate commodity tariff filed by the Railroad. The suit was by the Railroad against the Commission and a state prosecuting attorney.
Mr. Edward A. Haid, with whom Messrs. H. W. Applegate, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Brooks Hays, Assistant Attorney General, were on the brief, for appellant.
Mr. Thomas S. Buzbee, with whom Messrs. Marcus L. Bell and William F. Dickinson were on the brief, for appellee.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Arkansas Valley Land Cattle Company v. Mann

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
130 U.S. 69
Arkansas Valley Land Cattle Company v. Mann
Hugh Butler and Wm. A. Maury, for plaintiff in error.
E. T. Wells and R. T. McNeal, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Arkansas Valley Smelting Company v. Belden Mining Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
127 U.S. 379
Arkansas Valley Smelting Company v. Belden Mining Company
[Statement of Case from pages 379-381 intentionally omitted]
R. S. Morrison, T. M. Patterson, and C. S. Thomas, for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 381-387 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice GRAY, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Arkansas Public Service Commission v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
355 U.S. 4
Arkansas Public Service Commission v. United States
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice WHITTAKER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Arkansas Southern Railway Company v. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
218 U.S. 431
Arkansas Southern Railway Company v. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Company
Argued: November 4, 1910. --- Decided: November 28, 1910
Messrs. A. A. Gunby and Allan Sholars for plaintiffs in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 432-434 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Henry Moore, Jr., H. H. White, Henry Moore, and Samuel Herrick for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 434 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bayou Folk/Old Aunt Peggy

When the war was over, old Aunt Peggy went to Monsieur, and said:-
“Massa, I ain’t never gwine to quit yer. I’m gittin’ ole an’ feeble, an’ my days is few in dis heah lan’ o’ sorrow an’ sin. All I axes is a li’le co’ner whar I kin set down an’ wait peaceful fu de en’.”
Monsieur and Madame were very much touched at this mark of affection and fidelity from Aunt Peggy. So, in the general reconstruction of the plantation which immediately followed the surrender, a nice cabin, pleasantly appointed, was set apart for the old woman. Madame did not even forget the very comfortable rocking-chair in which Aunt Peggy might “set down,” as she herself feelingly expressed it, “an’ wait fu de en’.”
She has been rocking ever since.
At intervals of about two years Aunt Peggy hobbles up to the house, and delivers the stereotyped address which had become more than familiar:-
“Mist’ess, I’s come to take a las’ look at you all. Le’ me look at you good. Le’ me look at de picters an’ photygraphs an’ de pianny, an’ evey’thing ‘fo’ it’s too late. One eye is done gone, an’ de udder’s a-gwine fas’. Any mo’nin’ yo’ po’ ole Aunt Peggy gwine wake up an’ fin’ herse’f stone bline.”
After such a visit Aunt Peggy invariably returns to her cabin with a generously filled apron.
The scruple which Monsieur one time felt in supporting a woman for so many years in idleness has entirely disappeared. Of late his attitude towards Aunt Peggy is simply one of profound astonishment, - wonder at the surprising age which an old black woman may attain when she sets her mind to it, for Aunt Peggy is a hundred and twenty-five, so she says.
It may not be true, however. Possibly she is older.
# Bayside Fish Flour Company v. Gentry

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
297 U.S. 422
Bayside Fish Flour Company v. Gentry
Argued: Feb. 12, 1936. --- Decided: March 2, 1936
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
Messrs. Walter Slack and Roy Daily, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Mr. Darwin Bryan, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Aviation Accident Report: American Airlines Flight 9

REPORT OF THE CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD
Of the investigation of an accident involving civil aircraft of the United States NC 16015 which occurred near St. Louis, Missouri, on December 11, 1940.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Aviation Accident Report: American Airlines Flight 383/Recommendations

3. RECOMMENDATIONS
The Board is aware of industry studies now under consideration pertaining to altitude reference instrumentation and cockpit instrument display. Included in these programs is the development of aural and visual low altitude warning features that can be incorporated into the aircraft altimetry system. Although no deficiencies have been found in the instrumentation presently employed in commercial ​transport operation; the Board believes that continued developments and improvements along these lines will certainly add to a greater margin of aviation safety.
It is also recognized that high performance aircraft operations are becoming increasingly complex especially in the critical flight regimes such as takeoff, approach, and landing. The Board therefore encourages acceleration of the program designed to improve data presentation.
| /s/ | CHARLES S. MURPHY Chairman |
| /s/ | ROBERT T. MURPHY Vice Chairman |
| /s/ | G. JOSEPH MINETTI Member |
| /s/ | WHITNEY GILLILLAND Member |
| /s/ | JOHN G. ADAMS Member |
# Aviation Accident Report: American Airlines Flight 383/Synopsis and Probable Cause

CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD
AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. BOEING 727, N1996 NEAR THE GREATER CINCINNATI AIRPORT CONSTANCE, KENTUCKY NOVEMBER 8, 1965
SYNOPSIS
American Airlines Flight 383, Boeing 727, N1996, a regularly scheduled passenger flight nonstop from LaGuardia Airport, New York to Cincinnati, Ohio, crashed and burned near the Greater Cincinnati Airport on November 8, 1965, at approximately 1902 e.s.t. Fifty-eight of the 62 persons on board were fatally injured in the accident.
The flight was conducting a visual landing approach to runway 18 when it crashed into a wooded hillside approximately two miles north of the runway. Initial impact occurred at an altitude 225 feet below the published airport elevation of 890 feet m.s.l.
At the time of the approach a line of rain showers and thunderstorms was moving into the Cincinnati area from the northwest. Rain was reported at the field shortly before the accident.
The last communication from the flight, five seconds before impact, indicated no awareness by the crew of the aircraft's low altitude.
The Board determines that the probable cause of this accident was the failure of the crew to properly monitor the altimeters during the visual approach into deteriorating visibility conditions.
# Back to the Republic/Chapter10

Chapter X
CONCLUSION
I HAVE striven to make clear the meaning of the words "autocracy," "democracy" and "republic," and have urged the importance of avoiding the extremes of either autocracy or democracy and the vital need of adhering strictly and literally to the republic.
If you have read this book carefully and are still in doubt as to the meaning of those three words, I beg of you to read the works of Alexander Hamilton, the words of George Washington, the teachings of James Madison, the decisions of John Marshall, the debates of Daniel Webster, the utterances of Abraham Lincoln, the addresses of William McKinley, and the Constitution of the United States, and study the laws of nature. You will then reach the conclusions set forth in this book.
When you understand clearly the meaning of the words "autocracy," "democracy" and "republic," you will favor the republic as the best form of government. It should then be your solemn ​duty as well as your high privilege to exert every effort and utilize every legitimate influence to assure a republic as the form of government under which you live.
If you live in the United States of America, you can do this most effectively by working for the election of executives and members of the legislative bodies, in nation, State, county and city, who understand the meaning of a republic and who will conduct the government in accordance with the plan of a republic.
If you live in some other country, you should work for the adoption of a constitution that will provide for the four elements which make possible the founding of a republic in lieu of the form of government which now prevails.
"Back to the republic" should be the watch-word of every patriot in this country, and "Forward to the republic" should be the keynote of every patriot in each of the other countries of the world.
The people of this country for their own good should get "back to the republic" as soon as possible, and the people of each of the other countries, for their own good, should move forward to a republic as rapidly as possible.
The sooner we get "back to the republic" in this country and the people of each of the other ​countries move forward to a republic, the sooner retrogression will end and progress begin.
The world conflagration makes this the supreme hour when all true patriots should examine their political compass, get their bearings, know where they stand and anchor to the republic.
The republic is the key to the solution of this awful, this tragic international crisis.
"In medio tutissimus ibis." "You will go safest in a middle course."
"Αριστον μἐτρον." "The medium is best."
# Back to Rest

* "Back to Rest" in Soldier poets, songs of the fighting men (1916)
* "Back to Rest" in A treasury of war poetry, British and American poems of the world war, 1914-1919 (1917)
# Aunt Caroline's Dixieland Recipes/Pickles, Relishes/English Chopped Pickle

ENGLISH CHOPPED PICKLE
One large head of cabbage, One gallon of green tomatoes, One small bottle of sliced cucumber pickle (store pickle), Fifteen large onions.
Chop all fine and let stand over night, sprinkling them with salt. Do not put cabbage with onions and tomatoes. Next morning squeeze out the cabbage, onions and tomatoes, and put on in kettle. Add three quarts of vinegar, four pounds of brown sugar, one package of seedless raisins, one-half ounce of ground red pepper, eight tablespoonsful of white mustard seed, four tablespoonsful each of celery seed, one tablespoonful each of allspice, ginger, cloves and tumeric. Mix well together and cook about one hour.
# Aunt Caroline's Dixieland Recipes/Pickles, Relishes/Mount Vernon Pickle

MOUNT VERNON PICKLE
One peck of green peppers, One string six inches long of red peppers, One large cabbage or two small ones, Four large onions, Four tablespoonsful of celery seed, One-fourth pound of black and white mustard seeds each, Two tablespoonful of tumeric.
Chop peppers, onions and cabbage fine and soak in one and a half cups of salt all night. Then cover well with vinegar and put equal parts of sugar. Add seasoning and cook about two and one-half hours.
# Aunt Caroline's Dixieland Recipes/Pickles, Relishes/Green Tomato Pickle

GREEN TOMATO PICKLE
Two quarts of green tomatoes, Six large onions, Three red peppers, Four quarts of cabbage, all chopped fine, Two ounces of white mustard seed, One-half ounce of celery seeds, Two and one-half pounds of sugar, One-half ounce of tumeric, One gill of salt, Two quarts of vinegar.
Soak tomatoes, onions and cabbage in salt water one-half hour, wash and drain, add other ingredients and boil twenty minutes.