OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Code/Title 47/Chapter 5/Subchapter II/Part I

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Title 47—Telegraphs, Telephones, and Radiotelegraphs Chapter 5—Wire or Radio Communication Subchapter III—Special Provisions Relating to Radio Part I—Common Carrier Regulation
* Section 201—Service and charges
* Section 202—Discriminations and preferences
* Section 203—Schedules of charges
* Section 204—Hearings on new charges; suspension pending hearing; refunds; duration of hearing; appeal of order concluding hearing
* Section 205—Commission authorized to prescribe just and reasonable charges; penalties for violations
* Section 206—Carriers' liability for damages
* Section 207—Recovery of damages
* Section 208—Complaints to Commission; investigations; duration of investigation; appeal of order concluding investigation
* Section 209—Orders for payment of money
* Section 210—Franks and passes; free service to governmental agencies in connection with national defense
* Section 211—Contracts of carriers; filing with Commission
* Section 212—Interlocking directorates; officials dealing in securities
* Section 213—Valuation of property of carrier
* Section 214—Extension of lines or discontinuance of service; certificate of public convenience and necessity
* Section 215—Examination of transactions relating to furnishing of services, equipment, etc.; reports to Congress
* Section 216—Receivers and trustees; application of chapter
* Section 217—Agents' acts and omissions; liability of carrier
* Section 218—Management of business; inquiries by Commission
* Section 219—Reports by carriers; contents and requirements generally
* Section 220—Accounts, records, and memoranda
* Section 221—Consolidations and mergers of telephone companies
* Section 222—Privacy of customer information
* Section 223—Obscene or harassing telephone calls in the District of Columbia or in interstate or foreign communications
* Section 224—Pole attachments
* Section 225—Telecommunications services for hearing-impaired and speech-impaired individuals
* Section 226—Telephone operator services
* Section 227—Restrictions on use of telephone equipment
* Section 227a—Consumer education materials on how to avoid scams that rely upon misleading or inaccurate caller identification information
* Section 227b—Call authentication
* Section 227b-1—Access to number resources
* Section 227b-2—Provision of evidence of certain robocall violations to Attorney General
* Section 228—Regulation of carrier offering of pay-per-call services
* Section 229—Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act compliance
* Section 230—Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material
* Section 231—Restriction of access by minors to materials commercially distributed by means of World Wide Web that are harmful to minors
# United States Code/Title 47/Chapter 12/Section 1303

§ 1303. Improving Federal data on broadband
(a) [Omitted]
(b) International comparison.
* In general. As part of the assessment and report required by section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. 157), the Federal Communications Commission shall include information comparing the extent of broadband service capability (including data transmission speeds and price for broadband service capability) in a total of 75 communities in at least 25 countries abroad for each of the data rate benchmarks for broadband service utilized by the Commission to reflect different speed tiers.
* Contents. The Commission shall choose communities for the comparison under this subsection in a manner that will offer, to the extent possible, communities of a population size, population density, topography, and demographic profile that are comparable to the population size, population density, topography, and demographic profile of various communities within the United States. The Commission shall include in the comparison under this subsection--
* Similarities and differences. The Commission shall identify relevant similarities and differences in each community, including their market structures, the number of competitors, the number of facilities-based providers, the types of technologies deployed by such providers, the applications and services those technologies enable, the regulatory model under which broadband service capability is provided, the types of applications and services used, business and residential use of such services, and other media available to consumers.
(c) Consumer survey of broadband service capability.
* In general. For the purpose of evaluating, on a statistically significant basis, the national characteristics of the use of broadband service capability, the Commission shall conduct and make public periodic surveys of consumers in urban, suburban, and rural areas in the large business, small business, and residential consumer markets to determine--
* Public availability. The Commission shall make publicly available the results of surveys conducted under this subsection at least once per year.
(d) Improving census data on broadband. The Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Federal Communications Commission, shall expand the American Community Survey conducted by the Bureau of the Census to elicit information for residential households, including those located on native lands, to determine whether persons at such households own or use a computer at that address, whether persons at that address subscribe to Internet service and, if so, whether such persons subscribe to dial-up or broadband Internet service at that address.
(e) Proprietary information. Nothing in this title shall reduce or remove any obligation the Commission has to protect proprietary information, nor shall this title be construed to compel the Commission to make publicly available any proprietary information.
# United States Code/Title 47/Chapter 5/Subchapter II

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Title 47—Telegraphs, Telephones, and Radiotelegraphs Chapter 5—Wire or Radio Communication Subchapter II—Common Carriers
* Part I—Common Carrier Regulation
* Part II—Development of Competitive Markets
* Part III—Special Provisions Concerning Bell Operating Companies
# United States v. Moore

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Moore."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. More (7 U.S. 159), ( 2 L.Ed. 397 ), ( 3 Cranch, 159 )
* United States v. Moore (53 U.S. 209), ( 13 L.Ed. 958 ), ( 12 How. 209 )
* United States v. Moore (95 U.S. 760), ( 24 L.Ed. 588 )
* United States v. Moore (340 U.S. 616), ( 95 L.Ed. 582 ), ( 71 S.Ct. 524 )
# United States v. Montgomery County Board of Education

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
395 U.S. 225
UNITED STATES, Petitioner, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al. Arlam CARR, Jr., by Arlam Carr and Johnnie Carr, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al.
No. 798, 997. Argued: April 28, 1969. --- Decided: June 2, 1969.
Sol. Gen. Erwin N. Griswold and Jack Greenberg, New York City, for petitioners.
Joseph D. Phelps, Montgomery, Ala., for respondents.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Moore (340 U.S. 616)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
340 U.S. 616
United States v. Moore
Argued and Submitted Feb. 28-
March 1, 1951.
Decided March 26, 1951.
Rehearing Denied April 30, 1951.
See 341 U.S. 923, 71 S.Ct. 740.
Mr. James L. Morrisson, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Frank Cusack, Dallas, Tex., for respondents.
Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Moore (53 U.S. 209)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
53 U.S. 209
The United States v. Michael Moore
Argued: December 29, 1851 --- Decided: January 15, 1852

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Mooney

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
116 U.S. 104
United States v. Mooney
Argued: December 14, 1885. ---
This was an action at law brought in the circuit court to recover of the defendant $20,000, the value of certain merchandise imported by him, which it was alleged he had forfeited to the United States, because he had knowingly, and with intent to defraud the revenue, made an entry of the same by means of false and fraudulent invoices. The defendant moved the court to dismiss the suit for want of jurisdiction to entertain it. The court sustained the motion, and the plaintiffs brought this writ of error.
Sol. Gen. Goode, for the United States.
Chas. Levi Woodbury, for defendant in error, John H. Mooney.
WOODS, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 1654

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 5360th meeting, on 31 January 2006
The Security Council,
Recalling its previous resolutions concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in particular resolutions 1616 of 29 July 2005 and 1649 of 21 December 2005,
Declaring its determination to closely monitor compliance with the arms embargo imposed by resolution 1493 and expanded by resolution 1596, and to enforce the measures provided for in paragraphs 13 and 15 of resolution 1596 against persons and entities acting in violation of this embargo,
Noting that the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo continues to constitute a threat to international peace and security in the region,
Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations,
1. Requests the Secretary-General, in consultation with the Committee established in accordance with paragraph 8 of resolution 1533, to re-establish the Group of Experts referred to in paragraph 10 of resolution 1533 and paragraph 21 of resolution 1596, within thirty days from the date of adoption of this resolution and for a period expiring on 31 July 2006;
2. Requests the Group of Experts to continue fulfilling its mandate as defined in resolutions 1533, 1596 and 1649, to update the Committee on its work by 10 April 2006, and to report to the Council in writing, through the Committee, before 10 July 2006;
3. Reaffirms its demand that all parties and all States cooperate fully with the work of the Group of Experts, and that they ensure:
    – the safety of their members;
    – unhindered and immediate access, in particular to persons, documents and sites the Group of Experts deems relevant to the execution of its mandate;
4. Decides to remain seized of the matter.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 1657

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 5366th meeting, on 6 February 2006
The Security Council,
Recalling its previous resolutions and statements of its President relating to the situation in Côte d’Ivoire and in the subregion, in particular its resolutions 1609 (2005) of 24 June 2005, 1626 (2005) of 19 September 2005 and 1652 (2006) of 24 January 2006,
Reaffirming its strong commitment to the sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity and unity of Côte d’Ivoire, and recalling the importance of the principles of good-neighbourliness, non-interference and regional cooperation,
Taking note of the letter of the Secretary-General addressed to the President of the Security Council dated 1 February 2006 (S/2006/71),
Recalling that the current mandate of the United Nations Mission in Liberia (UNMIL) will expire on 31 March 2006,
Expressing its serious concern at the persistence of the crisis in Côte d’Ivoire and of obstacles to the peace and national reconciliation process from all sides,
Determining that the situation in Côte d’Ivoire continues to pose a threat to international peace and security in the region,
Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations,
1. Decides to authorize the Secretary-General to redeploy immediately a maximum of one infantry company from UNMIL to the United Nations Operation in Côte d’Ivoire (UNOCI), until 31 March 2006, in order to provide extra security coverage for United Nations personnel and property, and to perform other tasks mandated to UNOCI, without prejudice to any future decision by the Security Council concerning the renewal of the mandate and level of troops of UNMIL and a further extension of the redeployment mentioned above;
2. Expresses its intention to review the provisions of paragraph 1 above in 30 days and by 31 March 2006, in light of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire and in Liberia;
3. Expresses its intention to keep under review possible additional redeployments of troops between UNMIL and UNOCI;
4. Decides to remain actively seized of the matter.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 1656

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 5363rd meeting, on 31 January 2006
The Security Council,
Recalling its relevant resolutions on the issue and in particular resolution 1615 (2005) of 29 July 2005,
Taking note of the scheduled meeting of the Group of Friends of the Secretary- General on Georgia in Geneva on 2 and 3 February 2006,
1. Decides to extend the mandate of the United Nations Observer Mission in Georgia (UNOMIG) until 31 March 2006;
2. Decides to remain actively seized of the matter.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 166

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 971th meeting, by 9 votes to none, with 1 abstention (United States of America), on 25 October 1961
The Security Council,
Having examined the application of the Mongolian People's Republic for admission to membership in the United Nations,
Recommends to the General Assembly that the Mongolian People's Republic be admitted to membership in the United Nations.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 1661

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 5384th meeting, on 14 March 2006
The Security Council,
Reaffirming all its previous resolutions and statements pertaining to the situation between Ethiopia and Eritrea, and the requirements contained therein, including in particular resolutions 1622 (2005) of 13 September 2005 and 1640 (2005) of 23 November 2005, as well as the statement of its President of 24 February 2006 (S/PRST/2006/10),
Stressing its unwavering commitment to the peace process, and to the full and expeditious implementation of the Algiers Agreements,
Stressing further that lasting peace between Ethiopia and Eritrea (hereinafter referred to as “the parties”) as well as in the region cannot be achieved without the full demarcation of the border between the two parties, and recalling that both parties have agreed to accept the delimitation and demarcation decisions of the Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission (EEBC) as final and binding,
Reaffirming its strong commitment to ensure that the two parties permit the United Nations Mission in Ethiopia and Eritrea (UNMEE) to perform its duties without restrictions and provide UNMEE with the necessary access, assistance, support and protection required for the performance of these duties, and in this regard stressing that demarcation of the border cannot proceed effectively unless UNMEE is allowed full freedom of movement throughout its area of operations,
Welcoming the successful convening of the meeting of the Witnesses to the Algiers Agreements on 22 February 2006 in New York, as well as the convening of the EEBC meeting on 10 March 2006 in London,
Bearing in mind the reports of the Secretary-General of 3 January 2006 (S/2006/1) and of 6 March 2006 (S/2006/140) and the options on the future of UNMEE contained therein,
Decides to extend the mandate of UNMEE for a period of one month until 15 April 2006;
Demands that the two parties fully comply with resolution 1640 (2005), in particular paragraphs 1 and 5;
Decides to remain actively seized of the matter.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. California Co-Operative Canneries

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
279 U.S. 553
United States v. California Co-Operative Canneries
Argued: April 16, 1929. --- Decided: May 20, 1929
Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, of Washington, D. C., for the United states.
Mr. Nelson T. Hartson, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 553-555 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. California Eastern Line

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
348 U.S. 351
United States v. California Eastern Line
Argued: Feb. 10, 1955. --- Decided: March 7, 1955
Mr.
Oscar H. Davis, Washington, for petitioners.
Mr. Harold B. Finn, New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Callahan Walker Construction Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
317 U.S. 56
United States v. Callahan Walker Construction Company
Argued: Oct. 23, 1942. --- Decided: Nov 9, 1942
See 317 U.S. 710, 63 mS.Ct. 203, 87 L.Ed. --.
Messrs. Francis Biddle, Atty. Gen., and Richard S. Salant, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Robert A. Littleton, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Caltex

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
344 U.S. 149
United States v. Caltex
Argued: Oct. 20, 1952. --- Decided: Dec 8, 1952
See 344 U.S. 919, 73 S.Ct. 345.
Mr. Holmes Baldridge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Albert R. Connelly, New York City, for respondents Shell Co. of Philippine Islands, Ltd., and Standard-Vacuum Oil Co.
Mr. Leo T. Kissam, New York City, for respondent Caltex (Philippines), Inc.
Mr. Chief Justice VINSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse