OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Ven. Thomas Pormort

From volume 12 of the work.
English martyr, b. at Hull about 1559; d. at St. Paul's Churchyard, 20 Feb., 1592. He was probably related to the family of Pormort of Great Grimsby and Saltfletby, Lincoln shire. George Pormort, Mayor of Grimsby in 1565, had a second son Thomas baptized, 7 February, 1566, but this can hardly be the martyr. After receiving some education at Cambridge, he went to Rheims, 15 January, 1581, and thence, 20 March following, to Rome, where he was ordained priest in 1587. He entered the household of Owen Lewis, Bishop of Cassano, 6 March, 1587. On 25 April, 1590, Pormort became prefect of studies in the Swiss college at Milan. He was relieved of this office, and started for England, 15 September, without waiting for his faculties. Crossing the St. Gotthard Pass, he reached Brussels before 29 November. There he became man servant to Mrs. Geoffrey Pole, under the name of Whitgift, the Protestant archbishop being his godfather. With her he went to Antwerp, intending to proceed to Flushing, and thence to England. He was arrested in London on St. James's Day (25 July), 1591, but he managed to escape. In August or September, 1591, he was again taken, and committed to Bridewell, whence he was removed to Topcliffe's house. He was repeatedly racked and sustained a rupture in consequence. On 8 February following he was convicted of high treason for being a seminary priest, and for reconciling John Barwys, or Burrows, haberdasher. He pleaded that he had no faculties; but he was found guilty. At the bar he accused Topcliffe of having boasted to him of indecent familiarities with the queen. Hence Topcliffe obtained a mandamus to the sheriff to proceed with the execution, though Archbishop Whitgift endeavoured to delay it and make his godson conform, and though (it is said) Pormort would have admitted conference with Protestant ministers. The gibbet was erected over against the haberdasher's shop, and the martyr was kept standing two hours in his shirt upon the ladder on a very cold day, while Topcliffe vainly urged him to withdraw his accusation.
POLLEN, English Martyrs 1584-1603 (London, 1908), 187-190, 200-2, 208-10, 292; Acts of the English Martyrs (London, 1891), 118-20; CHALLONER, Missionary Priests, I, no. 95; GILLOW, Bibl. Dict. Eng. Cath., s. v.; Harleian Society Publications, LII (London, 1904), 790; KNOX, Douay Diaries (London, 1878), 174-7.
John B. Wainewright.
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Ven. Thomas Tunstall

From volume 15 of the work.
Martyred at Norwich, 13 July, 1616. He was descended from the Tunstalls of Thurland, an ancient Lancashire family who afterwards settled in Yorkshire. In the Douay Diaries he is called by the alias of Helmes and is described as Carleolensis, that is, born within the ancient Diocese of Carlisle. He took the College oath at Douay on 24 May, 1607; received minor orders at Arras, 13 June, 1609, and the subdiaconate at Douay on 24 June following. The diary does not record his ordination to the diaconate or priesthood, but he left the college as a priest on 17 August, 1610. On reaching England he was almost immediately apprehended and spent four or five years in various prisons till he succeeded in escaping from Wisbech Castle. He made his way to a friend's house near Lynn, where is was recaptured and committed to Norwich Gaol. At the next assizes he was tried and condemned (12 July, 1616). The saintliness of his demeanor on the scaffold produced a profound impression on the people. There is a contemporary portrait of the martyr at Stonyhurst, showing him as a man still young with abundant black hair and dark moustache.
CHALLONER, Memoirs of Missionary Priests, II (London, 1742); Third Douay Diary, X, XI (Catholic Record Society, London, 1911); FOLEY, Records Eng. Prov. S.J., XII (London, 1879).
Edwin Burton.
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Ven. Thomas Holland

From volume 7 of the work.
An English martyr, b. 1600 at Sutton, Lancashire; martyred at Tyburn, 12 December, 1642. He was probably son of Richard Holland, gentleman, was educated at St.Omer's and subsequently in August, 1621, went to Valladolid, where he took the missionary oath 29 December, 1633. When the abortive negotiations for the spanish match were taking place in 1623, Holland was sent to Madrid to assure Prince Charles of the loyalty of the seminarists of Valladolid, which he did in a Latin oration. In 1624 he entered the novitiate of the Society of Jesus at Watten in Flanders and not long after was ordained priest at Liège. After serving as minister at Ghent and prefect at St. Omer's he was made a spiritual coadjutor at Ghent (28 May, 1634) and sent on the English mission the following year. He was an adept in disguising himself, and could speak French, Spanish, and Flemish to perfection but was eventually arrested on suspicion in a London street 4 Oct., 1642, and committed to the New Prison. He was afterwards transferred to Newgate, and arraigned at the Old Bailey, 7 December, for being a priest. There was no conclusive evidence as to this; but as he refused to swear he was not, the jury found him guilty, to the indignation of the Lord Mayor, Sir Isaac Pennington, and another member of the bench named Garroway. On Saturday, 10 December, Sergeant Peter Phesant, presumably acting for the recorder, reluctantly passed sentence on him. On his return to prison great multitudes resorted to him, and he heard many confessions. On Sunday and Monday he was able to say Mass in prison, and soon after his last Mass was taken off to execution. There he was allowed to make a considerable speech and to say many prayers, and when the cart was turned away, he was left to hang till he was dead. His brethren called him bibliotheca pietatis.
POLLEN, Acts of the English Martyrs (London, 1891), 358-367; CHALLONER, Missionary Priests, II, no. 174; GILLOW, Bibl. Dict. Eng. Cath. (London and New York, 1885-1902), III, 353-6; COOPER in Dict. Nat. Biog.
J. B. Wainewright.
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Ven. Thomas Pilchard

From volume 12 of the work.
(Or PILCHER).
Martyr, born at Battle, Sussex, 1557; died at Dorchester, 21 March 1586-7. He became a Fellow of Balliol College, Oxford, in 1576, and took the degree of M.A., in 1579, resigning his fellowship the following year. He arrived at Reims 20 November, 1581, and was ordained priest at Laon, March, 1583, and was sent on the mission. He was arrested soon after, and banished; but returned almost immediately. He was again arrested early in March, 1586-7, and imprisoned in Dorchester Gaol, and in the fortnight between committal to prison and condemnation converted thirty persons. He was so cruelly drawn upon the hurdle that he was fainting when he came to the place of execution. When the rope was cut, being still alive he stood erect under the scaffold. The executioner, a cook, carried out the sentence so clumsily that the victim, turning to the sheriff, exclaimed "Is this then your justice, Mr. Sheriff?" According to another account "the priest raised himself and putting out his hands cast forward his own bowels, crying 'Miserere mei'". Father Warford says: "There was not a priest in the whole West of England, who, to my knowledge, was his equal in virtue."
John B. Wainewright.
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Ven. Thomas Sprott

From volume 14 of the work.
(Spratt)
English martyr, b. at Skelsmergh, near Kendal, Westmoreland; suffered at Lincoln with [the Venerable] Thomas Hunt, 11 July, 1600. Sprott was ordained priest from the English College, Douai, in 1596, was sent on the mission that same year, and signed the letter to the pope, dated 8 November, 1598, in favour of the institution in England of the archpriest. Hunt, a native of Norfolk, was a priest of the English College of Seville, and had been imprisoned at Wisbech, where he had escaped with five others, some months previously. They were arrested at the Saracen's Head, Lincoln, upon the discovery of the holy oils and two Breviaries in their mails. When brought to trial, though their being priests was neither proved nor confessed, nor was any evidence produced, the judge, Sir John Glanville, directed the jury to find them guilty, which was done. The judge died sixteen days afterwards under unusual circumstances, as Dr. Worthington (quoted by Bishop Challoner) records.
CHALLONER, Missionary Priests, I (Edinburgh, 1877), nos. 118 and 119; KNOX, Douay Diaries (London, 1878), 16, 32; POLLEN, English Martyrs 1584-1683 in Cath. Rec. Soc. (London, 1908), 384.
John B. Wainewright.
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Ven. Thomas Tichborne

From volume 14 of the work.
Born at Hartley, Hampshire, 1567; martyred at Tyburn, London, 20 April, 1602. He was educated at Rheims (1584-87) and Rome, where he was ordained on Ascension Day, 17 May, 1592. Returning to England on 10 March, 1594, he laboured in his native county, where he escaped apprehension till the early part of 1597. He was sent a prisoner to the Gatehouse in London, but in the autumn of 1598 was helped to escape by his brother, Ven. Nicholas Tichborne, and Ven. Thomas Hackshot, who were both martyred shortly afterwards. Betrayed by Atkinson, an apostate priest, he was re-arrested and on 17 April, 1602, was brought to trial with Ven. Robert Watkinson (a young Yorkshire man who had been educated at Rome and ordained priest at Douai a month before) and Ven. James Duckett, a London bookseller. On 20 April he was executed with Ven. Robert Watkinson and Ven. Francis Page, S.J. The last named was a convert, of a Middlesex family though born in Antwerp. He had been ordained at Douai in 1600 and received into the Society of Jesus while a prisoner in Newgate. Ven. Thomas Tichborne was in the last stages of consumption when he was martyred.
Challoner, Memoris of Missionary Priests (London, 1741-2); Foley, Records Eng. Prov. S.J., I (London, 1877); Pollen, Acts of the English Martyrs (London, 1901); Idem, Unpublished documents relating to the English Martyrs in Cath. Rec. Soc., V (London, 1908); Dasent, Acts of the Privy Council, 1695-7 (London, 1902); Douay Diaries, 1st and 2nd (London, 1878), 3rd (London, 1911).
EDWIN BURTON
# Constitution Act, 1867 (annotated)/Schedule 3
## Contents

The Third Schedule: Provincial Public Works and Property to be the Property of Canada
| | The Third Schedule Provincial Public Works and Property to be the Property of Canada |
| 1. | Canals, with Lands and Water Power connected therewith. |
| 2. | Public Harbours. |
| 3. | Lighthouses and Piers, and Sable Island. |
| 4. | Steamboats, Dredges, and public Vessels. |
| 5. | Rivers and Lake Improvements. |
| 6. | Railways and Railway Stocks, Mortgages, and other Debts due by Railway Companies. |
| 7. | Military Roads. |
| 8. | Custom Houses, Post Offices, and all other Public Buildings, except such as the Government of Canada appropriate for the Use of the Provincial Legislatures and Governments. |
| 9. | Property transferred by the Imperial Government, and known as Ordnance Property. |
| 10. | Armouries, Drill Sheds, Military Clothing, and Munitions of War, and Lands set apart for general Public Purposes. |
# Constitution Act, 1867 (annotated)/Schedule 4
## Contents

The Fourth Schedule: Assets to be the Property of Ontario and Quebec conjointly
* The Fourth Schedule Assets to be the Property of Ontario and Quebec conjointly
* Upper Canada Building Fund.
* Lunatic Asylums.
* Normal School.
* Court Houses in Aylmer. Montreal. Kamouraska. (Lower Canada.)
* Law Society, Upper Canada.
* Montreal Turnpike Trust.
* University Permanent Fund.
* Royal Institution.
* Consolidated Municipal Loan Fund, Upper Canada.
* Consolidated Municipal Loan Fund, Lower Canada.
* Agricultural Society, Upper Canada.
* Lower Canada Legislative Grant.
* Quebec Fire Loan.
* Temiscouata Advance Account.
* Quebec Turnpike Trust.
* Education - East.
* Building and Jury Fund, Lower Canada.
* Municipalities Fund.
* Lower Canada Superior Education Income Fund.
# Constitution Act, 1867 (annotated)/Schedule 2
## Contents

The Second Schedule: Electoral Districts of Quebec specially fixed
* The Second Schedule Electoral Districts of Quebec specially fixed
* Pontiac.Missisquoi.Compton.
* Ottawa.Brome.Wolfe and Richmond.
* Argenteuil.Shefford.Megantic.
* Huntingdon.Stanstead.Town of Sherbrooke.
# Constitution Act, 1867 (annotated)/Schedule 5
## Contents

The Fifth Schedule: Oath of Allegiance and Declaration of Qualification
    Oath of Allegiance
    Declaration of Qualification
* The Fifth Schedule Oath of Allegiance and Declaration of Qualification
* Oath of Allegiance
* I A.B. do swear, That I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria.
* Note. The Name of the King or Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland for the Time being is to be substituted from Time to Time, with proper Terms of Reference thereto.
* Declaration of Qualification
* I A.B. do declare and testify, That I am by Law duly qualified to be appointed a Member of the Senate of Canada [or as the Case may be], and that I am legally or equitably seised as of Freehold for my own Use and Benefit of Lands or Tenements held in Free and Common Socage [or seised or possessed for my own Use and Benefit of Lands or Tenements held in Franc-alleu or in Roture (as the Case may be),] in the Province of Nova Scotia [or as the Case may be] of the Value of Four thousand Dollars over and above all Rents, Dues, Debts, Mortgages, Charges, and Incumbrances due or payable out of or charged on or affecting the same, and that I have not collusively or colourably obtained a Title to or become possessed of the said Lands and Tenements or any Part thereof for the Purpose of enabling me to become a Member of the Senate of Canada [or as the Case may be], and that my Real and Personal Property are together worth Four thousand Dollars over and above my Debts and Liabilities.
# Constitution Act, 1867 (annotated)/Schedule 6
## Contents

The Sixth Schedule: Primary Production from Non-Renewable Natural Resources and Forestry Resources
| | The Sixth Schedule Primary Production from Non-Renewable Natural Resources and Forestry Resources |
| 1. | For the purposes of section 92A of this Act, (a) production from a non-renewable natural resource is primary production therefrom if (i) it is in the form in which it exists upon its recovery or severance from its natural state, or (ii) it is a product resulting from processing or refining the resource, and is not a manufactured product or a product resulting from refining crude oil, refining upgraded heavy crude oil, refining gases or liquids derived from coal or refining a synthetic equivalent of crude oil; and (b) production from a forestry resource is primary production therefrom if it consists of sawlogs, poles, lumber, wood chips, sawdust or any other primary wood product, or wood pulp, and is not a product manufactured from wood. |

## Notes

* ↑ As enacted by the Constitution Act, 1982.
* ↑ As enacted by the Constitution Act, 1982.
# Corbett v. Stergios

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
381 U.S. 124
Corbett v. Stergios
Robert R. Eidsmoe, Sioux City, Iowa, for appellant.
Phillip S. Dandos, Sioux City, Iowa, for appellee.
Opinion on remand, 137 N.W.2d 266.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Corbett v. Stergios/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
381 U.S. 124
Corbett v. Stergios
In light of our construction of the Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation between the United States and the Kingdom of Greece, signed August 3, 1951, effective October 13, 1954, a construction confirmed by representations of the signatories whose views were not available to the Supreme Court of Iowa, the judgment is reversed. Clark v. Allen, 331 U.S. 503, 67 S.Ct. 1431, 91 L.Ed. 633.

## Notes

* ↑ 5 U.S. Treaties and Other International Agreements 1829; T.I.A.S. No. 3057.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Corbin Cabinet Lock Company v. Eagle Lock Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
150 U.S. 38
Corbin Cabinet Lock Company v. Eagle Lock Company
Chas. E. Mitchell and John P. Bartlett, for appellant.
Benj. Price and W. H. Thurston, for appellee.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Corbin v. County of Black Hawk

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
105 U.S. 659
Corbin v. County of Black Hawk
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Iowa.
The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. James D. Campbell for the appellant.
Mr. Galusha Parsons for the appellee.
MR. JUSTICE BLATCHFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Corbett v. Craven/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
215 U.S. 125
Corbett v. Craven
Argued: November 12, 1909. --- Decided: November 29, 1909
The assertion that this court has jurisdiction is based upon the contention of the plaintiff in error that he specially set up in his replication, filed below, a title acquired foregoing statement, delivered the opinion United States,-that is, a purchase of property from a trustee in bankruptcy under the sanction of the bankruptcy court, and that such title was denied by the decision of the state court. We are not called upon to consider these propositions from a purely abstract point of view, since, of course, we are only required to determine their import in so far as they are involved in the decision of the question arising on the record. Confining our contemplation to that subject, it, we think, becomes clear that the contentions are wholly irrelevant to the question of jurisdiction concerning which they are advanced and relied on. We say this, because it is obvious on the face of the record that the court below rested its decision solely on the ground that the plaintiff, as a purchaser pendente lite for the trustee, was bound by the decree renderd against the trustee in the equity cause, and that, giving to that decree the effect which it was entitled to have as the thing adjudged, under general principles of law it operated to estop the trustee and the plaintiff, his privy, from asserting title to the property. As, therefore, the court below did not, as an original question, consider and pass upon the nature and character of the rights of the parties arising from the transaction of purchase and sale, but its judgment was solely based upon the operation and effect of the prior judgment between the parties or their privies, it follows that the decision of the case was placed upon no Federal ground, but involved solely the decision of a question of general law,-that is, the effect and scope of the thing adjudged as arising from the prior judgment of the state court. Chouteau v. Gibson, 111 U.S. 200, 28 L. ed. 400, 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 340; San Francisco v. Itsell, 133 U.S. 65, 33 L. ed. 570, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 241; Covington v. First Nat. Bank, 198 U.S. 100, 107, 49 L. ed. 963, 967, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 562. Indeed, the fallacy underlying all the contentions urged in favor of our jurisdiction, and the arguments of inconvenience by which those propositions are sought to be maintained, in their ultimate conception involve the assumption either that the correctness of the state decree, which was held to be res judicata, is open for consideration on this record, or assail the conclusively settled doctrine that the scope and effect of a state judgment is peculiarly a question of state law, and therefore a decision relating only to such subject involves no Federal question.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Constitution of India (2020)/Part IVA

[PART IVA
FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES
51A. Fundamental duties.—It shall be the duty of every citizen of India—
    (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;
    (b) to cherish and follow the noble ideals which inspired our national struggle for freedom;
    (c) to uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India;
    (d) to defend the country and render national service when called upon to do so;
    (e) to promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of India transcending religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities; to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women;
    (f) to value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture;
    (g) to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life, and to have compassion for living creatures;
    (h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform; ​
    (i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;
    (j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement;
    [(k) who is a parent or guardian to provide opportunities for education to his child or, as the case may be, ward between the age of six and fourteen years.]
* ↑ Ins. by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 11 (w.e.f. 3-1-1977).
* ↑ Ins. by the Constitution (Eighty-sixth Amendment) Act, 2002, s. 4 (w.e.f. 1-4-2010).
# Credit Company v. Arkansas Cent Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
128 U.S. 258
Credit Company v. Arkansas Cent Railway Company
Matt. G. Reynolds, Geo. W. Caruth, J. B. Henderson, and James M. Lewis, for appellant.
J. J. Hornor, for appellees.
BRADLEY, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Creede Cripple Creek Mining Milling Company v. Uinta Tunnel Mining Transportation Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
196 U.S. 337
Creede Cripple Creek Mining Milling Company v. Uinta Tunnel Mining Transportation Company
Argued: April 15, 18, 1904. --- Decided: for reargument October 31, 1904
Messrs.Charles S. Thomas, A. T. Gunnell, William H. Bryant, H. H. Lee, T. M. Patterson, E. F. Richardson, and H. N. Hawkins for petitioner.
Messrs. Charles J. Hughes, Jr., Scott Ashton, and Gerald Hughes for respondent.
Mr. J. C. Helm as Amicus curioe, by special leave.
Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse