OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 1/The belle of the season

​Page:Once a Week Jul - Dec 1859.pdf/160 ​Page:Once a Week Jul - Dec 1859.pdf/161
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 1/The sprig of lavender

THE SPRIG OF LAVENDER.
I.
is a faded sprig of Lavender, in nowise worth the keeping,
Yet I prize it above other things, though valueless it be;
For she’s far off that gave it me, where clouds are calmly sleeping
All summer through, above the hills so very dear to me.
II.
The little hand that gave it, with the tiny faiiy fingers,
With touches imperceptible has stolen all my heart;
Oh! frankly does she offer it, and oftentimes it lingers
Right lovingly within my own, where’er we meet or part.
III.
Yes, she is fair and gentle, and her voice is low and tender
As the whisper of a summer wind, or distant streams at play;
And may good angels guard her well, and sunniest moments send her,
Will ever be my prayer for her, when I am far away.
IV.
And thoughts of her bring thoughts of home, and all I’ve left behind me;
And then my thoughts go wandering in the mansions of tbe Past,
And little is the Lavender then needed to remind me
How happy hours, like summer flowers, must fade and perish fast.
V.
And yet I keep the Lavender, and when again I meet her,
I’ll show her how I’ve kept it, and she'll turn away her head;
And blushing, say I’m foolish; but can anything be sweeter
Than to see the blushes rising o’er her cheek so rosy-red?
Memor.
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 1/The mistletoe bough; or, The romance of the rose

THE MISTLETOE BOUGH; or, THE ROMANCE OF THE ROSE.
With “sweets for the sweet” is the Christmas tree laden,
With mottoes and trinkets for youth and for maiden:
Oh, how bright are the smiles of those ladies so fair,
As they gather the fruits that are clustering there.
The firs and the laurels their branches entwine,
The glistening leaves of the green holly shine,
Its numberless berries, so brilliantly red,
Are seen all around us, while, high over head,
The delicate mistletoe trembles! — but now
Its spell is forgotten! — The mistletoe bough
No longer can call the quick flush to the face,
Its province no more is the “dangerous place.”
Yet where is the change? Its green leaves are as bright,
Its form is as graceful, its berries as white,
As when held so sacred, in temples of old,
By our Druid forefathers, as I have been told;
Or witness’d the timid or boisterous kiss
Once claim’d for its sake at such seasons as this.
I have heard that young ladies are oftener now
Kiss’d under the rose than the mistletoe bough:
For the kiss is more sweet given under its shade;
More earnest and true are the vows that are made
By the rose-tree so sweet that in fancy grows, And ’tis fair summer weather still under that rose: These mystical roses throughout all the year The-u. delicate buds and sweet blossoms uprear, With a lovelier tint and more exquisite hue Than yet ever in ﬁeld or in garden grew: And I'm told that young ladies would rather be now Kiss’d under the rose than the mistletoe bough.
M. E.
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 2/What one year brought

WHAT ONE YEAR BROUGHT.
If they had told me a year ago, As I lay, all love, at my darling’s feet, That our hearts would become more cold than snow, And our eyes never meet when we meet—
If they had told me the treasured tress
Would be shrivell’d and shrunk in the heedless flames; That love, and devotion, and tenderness Would become but idle names—
If they had told me the ring you wore (Well chosen, the opal’s changing hue) Would be lying crush’d at my feet on the floor For its crime that it bound me to you—
If they had told me your love was a lie, That your faith was faithless, and false your heart; That you would change sweetness to scorn, and I Should give scorn for your scorn, and depart—
I should have said, with a laugh, that the sun
Would be dark, the hills tottering, and shallow the sea: One short year through its snows and its roses has run, Yet you are wedded, and I am free.
W. W. M.
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 4/What?

WHAT?
She was working a slipper; but she didn’t like that; She sang a little melody, that wouldn’t do; She tried to read a little, then she played with the cat, And then commenced a note—“Dearest, Why didn’t you—?” And then she tore it up, and then tried to keep still And watch the spent sun till he dropped behind the hill.
He was reading a novel, but he didn’t like that, So he took down his fishing rod, that wouldn’t do; Then he whistled to his dog, then he put on his hat, And then commenced a note—“Dearest, Why didn’t you—?” And then he tore it up, and then tried to keep still And watch the spent sun till he dropped behind the hill.
The sun dropped out of sight, and she walked up the lane; He too, quite by chance, of course, came along; So they met, and they stopped: not a look would either deign: Then he said—nothing, and naught had she to say. At last he look’d up at her, and she look’d up too— “Why didn’t you—Dearest?”—“Dearest, why didn’t you—?”
W. H. Boughton.
# Four songs (1)/Crazy Jean

Crazy Jean.
Why, fair maid, in every feature, are ſuch ſigns of fear expreſs’d? Can a wandering wretched creature, with ſuch terror fill thy breaſt? Do my frenzied looks alarm thee? truſt me, ſweet, thy fears are vain; Not for kingdoms would I harm thee, ſhun not then poor crazy Jean.
Doſt thou weep to ſee my anguiſh? mark me and avoid my woe; When men flatter, ſigh and languiſh, think them falſe—I found them ſo. For I lov’d—oh! ſo ſincerely, none could ever love again! But the youth I lov’d ſo dearly ſtole the heart of crazy Jean.
Fondly my young heart receiv’d him, which was doom’d to love but one; He ſigh’d—he vow’d,—and I believ’d him, he was falſe, and I undone. From that hour has reaſon never held her empire o’er my brain; Henry fled—with him for ever, fled the wits of crazy Jean.
Now forlorn and broken hearted, and with frenzied thoughts beſet,
On the ſpot where once we parted, on the ſpot where firſt we met. Still I ſing my love born ditty, ſtill I ſlowly pace the plain; Whilſt each paſſer-by, in pity, cries, “God help thee, crazy Jean!”
# Californians for an Alternative in November v. California

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States
* sister projects: Wikidata item
United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 1
Californians for an Alternative in November et al. v. California et al.
Appeal from the Supreme Court of California
No. 605. Argued: N/A --- Decided: October 7, 1968
Appeal dismissed.
Doris Brian Walker for appellants.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Charles A. Barrett, Assistant Attorney General, and Clayton P. Roche, Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McConnell v. Rhay

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States
* sister projects: Wikidata item
United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 2
McConnell v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington
No. 87, Misc. Argued: N/A --- Decided: October 14, 1968
The decision in Mempa v. Rhay, 389 U.S. 128, holding that the Sixth Amendment, as applied through the Fourteenth Amendment, requires that counsel be afforded felony defendants in a proceeding for revocation of probation and imposition of deferred sentencing, should be applied retroactively.
Certiorari granted; judgments reversed and remanded.
Michael H. Rosen for petitioner in No. 458, Misc.
John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Stephen C. Way, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent in both cases.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

* ↑ Together with No. 458, Misc., Stiltner v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Arsenault v. Massachusetts

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States
* sister projects: Wikidata item
United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 5
Arsenault v. Massachusetts
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
No. 187, Misc. Argued: N/A --- Decided: October 14, 1968
Petitioner pleaded guilty to murder at a probable-cause hearing when he had no counsel. He testified at his trial (when he had counsel), and denied guilt. On cross-examination his prior plea was introduced. Petitioner was convicted and the State's highest court affirmed over his contention that admission of the prior plea was error. Based on White v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 59, decided after petitioner's trial, petitioner sought post-conviction relief, which that court denied on the ground that White was not retroactive.
Held: White v. Maryland, which is indistinguishable in principle from the present case, applies retroactively.
Certiorari granted; 353 Mass. 575, 233 N.E. 2d 730, reversed.
F. Lee Bailey for petitioner.
Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, Howard M. Miller, Assistant Attorney General, and Richard L. Levine, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Power Commission v. United Gas Pipe Line Company (393 U.S. 71)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item
United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 71
Federal Power Commission v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
No. 247. Argued: N/A --- Decided: October 21, 1968
This Court previously sustained the formula of the Federal Power Commission (FPC) for determining the tax component of respondent's cost of service but remanded the cases (386 U.S. 237) with respect to whether it was significant in applying the formula that respondent had both jurisdictional and nonjurisdictional income. The Court of Appeals held that the issue had been sufficiently raised by respondent's petition for rehearing before the FPC and that the formula required that consolidated tax savings be first allocated to respondent's nonjurisdictional income.
Held: Since the FPC did not disclose the basis for its order and did not "give clear indication that it has exercised the discretion with which Congress has empowered it," Phelps Dodge Corp. v. NLRB, 313 U.S. 177, 197, the cases were not in the proper posture for judicial review and should have been remanded to the FPC for further consideration.
Certiorari granted; 388 F.2d 385, reversed and remanded.
Solicitor General Griswold, Harris Weinstein, Richard A. Solomon, and Peter H. Schiff for petitioner in No. 247. Reuben Goldberg and George E. Morrow for petitioner in No. 248.
David T. Searls and Vernon W. Woods for respondent in both cases.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

* ↑ Together with No. 248, Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. United Gas Pipe Line Co., also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jersey Journal/1927/"Joe The Wop" Faces Murder Trial March 30

Felix Szczesny (1888-1926) in Jersey Journal on April 22, 1927.
"Joe The Wop" Faces Murder Trial March 30.
Postpone Trial of Alleged "Speak-Easy" Killer Scheduled for March 28.
Because he became embroiled in an argument as to who should buy the next drink in a Steuben Street "speakeasy," Ralph Grimaldi, known in police circles as "Joe the Wop," will stand trial March 30 for murder, following the death of Felix Szczesny, 39, of 160 Steuben Street. The Prosecutor's office originally set Grimaldi's murder trial for March 14, but because former Congressman James A. Hamill was engaged elsewhere, the case was put over until March 25 and again deferred until the 30th. Grimaldi was employed as a car repairer for the Hudson & Manhattan Railroad. After he stabbed his drinking companions the morning last October, he fled from the scene of the crime at 160 Steuben Street, but through the sleuthing of Charles Ballerine and Detective John O'Neill was traced to a small town in upper New York State, where he was nabbed and extradited to this State. The accused man with some of his companions was in the speak-easy and an argument arose over whose turn it was to buy a drink. When the words became heated they were ejected from the place. They continued the argument on the sidewalk, where Grimaldi was supposed to have pulled a knife from his pocket and with it stabbed Szczesny, who died in the City Hospital the following day. Assistant Prosecutor Aloysius McMahon, with Assistant Prosecutors Lewis G. Hansen and Eric Jentz, will present the State's case of murder against Grimaldi in Oyer & Terminer.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works could have had their copyright renewed between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st of the 29th year.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# International Terminal Operating Company v. Nv Nederl Amerik Stoomv Maats

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States
* sister projects: Wikidata item
United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 74
International Terminal Operating Co., Inc. v. N.V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
No. 379. Argued: N/A --- Decided: October 21, 1968
Respondent, a shipowner, sought indemnity from petitioner, a stevedoring company, for damages respondent had paid petitioner's employee, who had been injured while working on respondent's ship. The Court of Appeals reversed the jury's verdict for petitioner on the ground that as a matter of law petitioner had not taken reasonable action to avoid the injury.
Held: Under the Seventh Amendment the issue as to the reasonableness of petitioner's conduct should have been left to the jury. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd., 369 U.S. 355 (1962).
Certiorari granted; 392 F.2d 763, reversed.
Sidney A. Schwartz for petitioner.
Edmund F. Lamb for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chemical Tank Lines, Inc. v. Holstine

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States
* sister projects: Wikidata item
United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 78
Chemical Tank Lines, Inc. v. Holstine
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
No. 195. Argued: N/A --- Decided: October 21, 1968
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
J. Campbell Palmer III and Albert L. Bases for appellant.
Robert H.C. Kay and Stanley E. Preiser for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Continental Oil Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States
* sister projects: Wikidata item
United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 79
Continental Oil Co. v. United States
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico
No. 206. Argued: N/A --- Decided: October 21, 1968
Affirmed.
David T. Searls, Harry M. Reasoner, and Lloyd F. Thanhouser for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, and Lawrence W. Somerville for the United States.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# George W. Bush's remarks at the Islamic Center of Washington

Remarks at the Islamic Center of Washington, delivered six days after the September 11, 2001 attacks.
Thank you all very much for your hospitality. We've just had a—wide-ranging discussions on the matter at hand. Like the good folks standing with me, the American people were appalled and outraged at last Tuesday's attacks. And so were Muslims all across the world. Both Americans, our Muslim friends and citizens, taxpaying citizens, and Muslims in nations were just appalled and could not believe what we saw on our TV screens.
These acts of violence against innocents violate the fundamental tenets of the Islamic faith. And it's important for my fellow Americans to understand that.
The English translation is not as eloquent as the original Arabic, but let me quote from the Koran itself: "In the long run, evil in the extreme will be the end of those who do evil. For that they rejected the signs of Allah and held them up to ridicule."
The face of terror is not the true faith of Islam. That's not what Islam is all about. Islam is peace. These terrorists don't represent peace. They represent evil and war.
When we think of Islam, we think of a faith that brings comfort to a billion people around the world—billions of people find comfort and solace and peace—and that's made brothers and sisters out of every race—out of every race.
America counts millions of Muslims amongst our citizens, and Muslims make an incredibly valuable contribution to our country. Muslims are doctors, lawyers, law professors, members of the military, entrepreneurs, shopkeepers, moms, and dads. And they need to be treated with respect. In our anger and emotion, our fellow Americans must treat each other with respect.
Women who cover their heads in this country must feel comfortable going outside their homes. Moms who wear cover must not be intimidated in America. That's not the America I know. That's not the America I value.
I've been told that some fear to leave; some don't want to go shopping for their families; some don't want to go about their ordinary daily routines because, by wearing cover, they're afraid they'll be intimidated. That should not and that will not stand in America.
Those who feel like they can intimidate our fellow citizens to take out their anger don't represent the best of America. They represent the worst of humankind, and they should be ashamed of that kind of behavior.
This is a great country. It's a great country because we share the same values of respect and dignity and human worth. And it is my honor to be meeting with leaders who feel just the same way I do. They're outraged; they're sad. They love America just as much as I do.
I want to thank you all for giving me a chance to come by. And may God bless us all. Thank you.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fuller v. Alaska

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States
* sister projects: Wikidata item
United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 80
Fuller v. Alaska
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alaska
No. 249 Argued: N/A --- Decided: October 28, 1968
Lee v. Florida, 392 U.S. 378, which held inadmissible in state criminal trials evidence violative of § 605 of the Federal Communications Act, is to be applied only to trials in which such evidence is sought to be introduced after the date of that decision.
Certiorari granted; 437 P.2d 772, affirmed.
George Kaufmann for petitioner.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mengelkoch v. Industrial Welfare Commission

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States
* sister projects: Wikidata item
United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 83
Mengelkoch et al. v. Industrial Welfare Commission et al.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California
No. 375. Argued: N/A --- Decided: October 28, 1968
A three-judge federal court dissolved itself for want of jurisdiction. A single district judge then dismissed the case on the ground of abstention and incorporated the three-judge court's dissolution order in his opinion by reference. In this appeal from both judgments held that the Court of Appeals, and not this Court, has jurisdiction over the appeal from the dissolution order and from the abstention decision.
284 F.Supp. 950, vacated and remanded; 284 F.Supp. 956, dismissed.
Marguerite Rawalt for appellants.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Edward M. Belasco, Jay L. Linderman and William L. Zessar, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Overton v. New York

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States
* sister projects: Wikidata item
United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 85
Overton v. New York
On Petition for writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York
No. 212. Argued: N/A --- Decided: October 28, 1968
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
Melvin L. Wulf and David C. Gilberg for petitioner.
Carl A. Vergari and James J. Duggan for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lichten v. Texas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States
* sister projects: Wikidata item
United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 86
Lichten et al. v. Texas
Appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
No. 414. Argued: N/A --- Decided: October 28, 1968
434 S.W.2d 128, appeal dismissed.
Chris Dixie for appellants.
Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, A.J. Carubbi, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Hawthorne Phillips, Gilbert J. Pena, and Allo B. Crow, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse