OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Memphis

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Memphis."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, travel guide, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.

## Memphis, Egypt

* "Memphis (Egypt)," in The American Cyclopædia (1879)
* "Memphis (Egypt)," in Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition (15) (1883)
* "Memphis," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Memphis," in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
* "Memphis (Egypt)," in The Encyclopedia Americana, New York: The Encyclopedia Americana Corporation (1920)

## Memphis, Tennessee

* "Memphis (Tennessee)," in The American Cyclopædia (1879)
* "Memphis (Tennessee)," in Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition (15) (1883)
* "Memphis (Tennessee)," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Memphis (Tenn.)," in The Encyclopedia Americana, New York: The Encyclopedia Americana Corporation (1920)

## Memphis, Missouri

* "Memphis (Mo.)," in The Encyclopedia Americana, New York: The Encyclopedia Americana Corporation (1920)
# Memory (Coates)

"If it be true, as some aver"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1904), "Memory" in Mine and Thine (1904).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "Memory" in Poems I.
# M'Iver v. Ragan

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
15 U.S. 25
M'Iver v. Ragan

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# M'Niel v. Holbrook

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
37 U.S. 84
M'Niel v. Holbrook
ERROR to the circuit court of the United States, for the district of Georgia.
In the circuit court of the United States, for the district of Georgia, Lowell Holbrook instituted an action on four promissory notes; one of which was drawn by the plaintiff in error, in favour of Lowell Holbrook, and the three other notes were drawn in favour of other persons, who had endorsed the same over to Mr. Holbrook. An affidavit of the agent of the plaintiff, stating that the defendant, John M'Niel, was indebted to Lowell Holbrook in the amount of the said notes, was filed with the declaration. Issue being joined in the suit, the plaintiff to support the action, without having proved the handwriting of the drawer of the notes, or of those who had endorsed three of the notes to him, offered the testimony of W. W. Gordon, Esq. the counsel of the plaintiff, to prove 'that John M'Niel had repeatedly, and as late as November 1st, 1835, admitted his indebtedness upon those promissory notes; and, at the same time, offered to confess a judgment for the amount of principal and interest, upon certain terms, by which he was to be allowed time for the payment of part. The negotiation continued until November 3d, 1836; and then was only not completed, from the inability of John M'Niel to pay the cash, which he had in the first instance offered.' The defendant objected to the admission of this evidence, and insisted that the acknowledgment was only an offer by the defendant to buy his peace, by a compromise made in the course of a negotiation, for the settlement of the claim of Mr. Lowell Holbrook; which said compromise and negotiation having failed, the acknowledgment could not be given in evidence, to sustain the claim of the plaintiff. The defendant also objected to the evidence; as the plaintiff had declared against the defendant as endorser of promissory notes alleged to have been made by certain persons to him, he was bound to prove the endorsement of the notes by the said persons; and the court could not dispense with the proof of the endorsements. The court refused to give the instructions, as asked by the defendant; and instructed the jury, that the evidence offered and admitted was sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to recover against the defendant.
The jury having found a verdict for the plaintiff, according to the instructions of the court, and judgment having been entered thereon; the defendant prosecuted this writ of error.
The case was submitted to the Court by Mr. King: who also moved the Court to allow damages to the defendant in error, at the rate of ten per centum per annum, according to the 17th rule of the Court; which allows such damages, when a writ of error is sued out for delay.
Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# M'Lane v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
31 U.S. 404
M'Lane v. United States

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# M'Millan v. M'Neill

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
17 U.S. 209
M'Millan v. M'Neill

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Mackarness, Frederic Michael Coleridge

​Mackarness, Frederic Michael Coleridge, practises before the supreme court of Cape of Good Hope, undergrad. Keble Coll., Oxon, a student of the Middle Temple 26 June, 1875, called to the bar 25 June, 1879 (2nd son of Rt. Rev. John Frederic Mackarness, D.D., lord bishop of Oxford); born 31 Aug., 1854; married 11 Feb., 1882, Amy, dau. of late Rev. Richard Chermside, rector of Wilton, Wilts (see Foster's Peerage).
    Cape of Good Hope.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Mackenzie, William Dalziel

​Mackenzie, William Dalziel, M.A., Magdalen Coll., Oxon, 1865, from Harrow, late director London and North-western Railway Company, hon. major Queen's own Oxfordshire hussars since 1883, capt. 1878-83, J.P. cos. Kirkcudbright, Dumfries, Bucks, and Oxon, high sheriff 1873, a student of the Inner Temple 31 Oct., 1859 (then aged 19), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1863 (eldest son of Edward Mackenzie, Esq., of Fawley Court, Bucks); born 31 March, 1840; married 1 Dec., 1863, Mary Anna, eldest dau. of late Henry Baskerville, Esq., of Crowsley Park, Oxon, and has issue.
    Fawley Court, Henley-on-Thames; The Canons, Thetford, Glenkyllachy, Inverness, N.B.; Newbie, Dumfries-shire; Carlton, Constitutional, and Junior Carlton Clubs, S.W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Mackay, Alexander Spencer Henry

​Mackay, Alexander Spencer Henry, B.A. St. John's Coll., Oxen, an examiner of the High Court of Justice since Feb., 1884, a student of the Inner Temple 16 Oct., 1867 (then aged 23), called to the bar 30 April, 1873 (only son of Alexander Mackay, late of Uxbridge, Middlesex, dec.); born , 1844; married 30 Dec., 1879, Annie, 4th dau. of late John Bearne, of Torquay, Devon.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Mackean, Ernest

​Mackean, Ernest, M.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1880, practises at Hong Kong, a student of the Inner Temple 15 April, 1873 (then aged 19), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1876 (7th son of late Thomas William Lockwood Mackean, of London, gent.); born , 1854.
    Hong Kong.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Mackenzie, William

​Mackenzie, William, went the South-eastern circuit, a student of the Middle Temple 23 Dec., 1846, called to the bar 31 Jan., 1851 (eldest son of William Mackenzie, Esq., of Harrow-on-the-Hill, Middlesex); born , .
# Men-at-the-Bar/Mackay, Hugh William Boyd

​Mackay, Hugh William Boyd, LL.B., B.A. (first prizeman in feudal and English law) Trin. Coll., Dublin, author of An Apology for the Present System of Conveyancing 1870, A Concise Practical Treatise on the Law of Property 1882, a student of the Middle Temple 20 April, 1863, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1870, called to the bar at King's Inns, Dublin, 25 April, 1865 (eldest son of Hugh Boyde Mackay, late of Coleraine, co. Londonderry, solicitor, dec.); born 21 April, 1843; married 16 Jan., 1877, Elisabeth, dau. of late Robert Leslie Acheson, Esq., of Limerick, and has issue.
    Topsham, South Devon; Castle Chambers, Castle Street, Exeter.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Mackay, Thomas Henry

​Mackay, Thomas Henry, a student of Lincoln's Inn 25 Jan., 1838 (then aged 22), called to the bar 30 Jan., 1844 (son of Spencer Mackay, Esq., of London); born , 1816.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Mackenzie, Henry Gordon

​Mackenzie, Henry Gordon, B.A., Magdalen Coll., Oxon, 1880, a student of the Inner Temple 11 Nov., 1876 (then aged 18), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1880 (2nd son of late Gordon Mackenzie, Esq., of Montreal, Canada); born , 1858; married 7 May, 1881, Beatrice Kathleen, dau. of Alexander Donavon, Esq., of Framfield Place, Sussex.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Mackenzie, Robert

​Mackenzie, Robert, a student of the Middle Temple 18 Oct., 1851, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1855 (eldest son of Donald Mackenzie, late an officer in 42nd highlanders, dec.); born ,
# Men-at-the-Bar/Holroyd, Henry

​Holroyd, Henry, judge of county courts (circuit No. 46) since 1883, of circuit No. 26 1880-3, reporter for Incorporated Council 1865-70, a student of the Middle Temple 7 Nov., 1844, called to the bar 6 June, 1853 (2nd son of George E. Holroyd, Esq., of Exeter); born , ; married 24 Aug., 1858, Louisa Fanny, dau. of late Edward Gordon, Esq., of Madras.
    14, Kensington Gardens Terrace, W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Holmes-Forbes, Avary William

​Holmes-Forbes, Avary William, B.A. Trin. Coll., Dublin, assumed the additional surname of Forbes, a student of Lincoln's Inn 24 Jan., 1876 (then aged 23), called to the bar 7 May, 1879 (only son of Avary Holmes, of Rathgar, co. Dublin, solicitor); born , 1853.
    2, Frankfort Avenue, Rathgar, Dublin.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Holroyd, (Hon.) Edward Dundas

​Holroyd, (Hon.) Edward Dundas, M.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1854, puisne judge supreme court of Victoria since Aug., 1881, member of the bar of Victoria 1859, educated at Winchester, a student of Gray's Inn 14 Nov., 1851, called to the bar 5 June, 1855 (2nd son of Edward Holroyd, Esq., of Wimbledon, Surrey, barrister of Gray's Inn); born , 1828; married , 1862, Anna Maria Hoyles, dau. of late Henry Compton, Esq., of Totnes, Devon.
    Fernacres East, South Victoria; Melbourne, Victoria.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Home, Henry Warlters

​Home, Henry Warlters, B.A., New Coll., Oxon, 1870, equity draftsman and conveyancer, a student of the Inner Temple 15 April, 1868 (then aged 22), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1871 (eldest son of Henry Home, Esq., of Caterham, Surrey); born 5 March, 1846; married 8 April, 1874 Harriet Elizabeth, sole surviving dau. of Arthur Beecher Pollock, Esq., of the Inner Temple, bar.-at-law (see Foster's Baronetage.
    Heston Lodge, Thornton Hill, Wimbledon; 6, Stone Buildings, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Holmes, William

​Holmes, William, a student of the Inner Temple 6 Nov., 1826, called to the bar 3 May, 1833 (eldest son of Richard Holmes, late of Kentish Town, Middlesex, dec.); born , .
# Men-at-the-Bar/Holt, Robert Edward Hallett

​Holt, Robert Edward Hallett, author of A Handybook on the Registration of Title and Transfer of Land, a student of Lincoln's Inn 30 Dec., 1871 (then aged 18), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1874 (eldest son of Robert Hallett Holt, of Lincoln's Inn, bar.-at-law, and a registrar of the land registry office, Lincoln's Inn Fields); born , 1853; married 1 Oct., 1877, Lucinda Elena, only dau. of late Charles Jackson, Esq., of Calle Florida, Buenos Ayres.
    3, Devonshire Terrace, Portland Place, W.; Staple Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Home, Hon. James Archibald

​Home, Hon. James Archibald, B.A. Oriel Coll., Oxon, a student of Lincoln's Inn 9 May, 1862, went to the Inner Temple 16 and called to the bar there 26 Jan., 1866 (2nd son of Rt. Hon. Cospatrick Alexander, 11th earl of Home); born 20 Jan., 1837 (see Foster's Peerage).
    6, Grosvenor Square. W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Holt, Alfred

​Holt, Alfred, B.A., Worcester Coll., Oxon, 1882, a student of the Middle Temple 18 April, 1878, called to the bar 6 June, 1883 (3rd son of John Holt, of London, D.L. Tower Hamlets); born , .
# Men-at-the-Bar/Holt, Robert Hallett

​Holt, Robert Hallett, a registrar of the land registry office since 1862, a student of Lincoln's Inn 4 June, 1847 (then aged 21), certificate of honour Trin., 1849, called to the bar 11 June, 1850 (6th son of Thomas Littleton Holt, Esq., of Gray's Inn, of Watford, Herts, and of Edmondstown, co. Louth); born 27 March, 1827.
    3, Devonshire Terrace, Portland Place, W.; Land Registry, Staple Inn.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Hone-Goldney, George Hone

​Hone-Goldney, George Hone, M.A. Trin. Hall, Camb., goes the Oxford circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 15 Jan., 1873 (then aged 21), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1877 (eldest son of late Rev. George Hone-Goldney, of Court Garden, Tunbridge Wells, Kent); born , 1852 (see Foster's Baronetage).
    Cleveden, Wimbledon, S.W.; 4, Paper Buildings, Temple, E.C.
# Massey v. Papin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
65 U.S. 362
Massey v. Papin
THIS case was brought up from the Supreme Court of Missouri by a writ of error issued under the 25th section of the Judiciary act.
The record was very voluminous, as it traced the title to land for a number of years. It is not necessary to follow this.
Mackay was the holder of a grant of land from Spain for 30,000 arpents, prior to 1819. In that year he gave a bond, by way of mortgage, in which he promised to convey fourteen-thirtieths of the land to Delassus, who assigned his interest in it to Leduc. In 1822, Mackay died, leaving a widow and eight children. In 1836, Congress confirmed the claim to Mackay or his legal representatives. In 1842, Leduc died, devising all his property to Hypolite Papin. Afterwards, in the same year, Papin died, devising all his property to his children equally. In 1854, Joseph L. Papin, one of the children, and the defendant in error, foreclosed the mortgage against the heirs and administrators of Delassus. It was sold, and Papin became the purchaser of fourteen-thirtieths of the 30,000 arpents. Papin then claimed a partition, which was resisted by Massey and others, who claimed under the heirs of Mackay. The Supreme Court of Missouri decided in favor of Papin, and the case was brought up to this court, where it was argued by Mr. Blair for the plaintiffs in error, and Mr. Glover for the defendant.
Mr. Justice CATRON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Massacre of Glencoe (5)/The Massacre of Glencoe

THE MASSACRE OF GLENCOE.
Tune,—‘ Scots wha ha'e,’ &c.
Broad set the sun o'er wild Glencoe, Red gleam'd the heights of drifted snow, And loud and hoarse the torrent's flow Dash'd thro' the drear domain, Bright shines the hearth's domestic blaze, The dancers bound in wanton maze, And merry minstrels tune their lays Blythe o'er the mountain reign.
Yon level sun sinks down in blood, Low'ring o'er dark ingratitude; It warns the guileless and the good, Glencoe's wo-fated clan. Each smiling host salutes his guests, ‘Good night,'-that hand so kindly prest Shall plunge the dagger in thy breast, Long ere the orient dawn.
All's still!-but hark! from height to height, Come's rushing on the breeze of night, The startling shriek of wild affright, The hoarse assassin yell
​Is there no arm on high to save From foulest death the trustful brave! Each by his threshold found a grave, Or where he slumber'd fell!
Red rose the sun o'er lone Glencoe; What eye shall mark that crimson'd snow, What ear shall list the torrent's flow Dashing the dreary wild. Round sheal and hamlet's shelt'ring rock High soars destruction's volum'd smoke, But hush'd the shriek which maddening broke From mother, maiden, child.
All's still!-save round yon mountain's head, Where men of blood the snow-path tread, Startling lest voices from the dead A deed of hell proclaim. Wo for thy clan, thou wild Glencoe! Whose blood dyes deep the mountain snow But deadlier bale, and deeper wo, Glenorchy, on thy name.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Massey Motors, Inc. v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
364 U.S. 92
Massey Motors, Inc. v. United States
Mr. Edgar Bernhard, Chicago, Ill., for respondents.
Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Massey v. Papin/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
65 U.S. 362
Massey v. Papin
This case is brought here by writ of error to the Supreme Court of Missouri.
In 1806, James Mackay presented his claim before the board of commissioners, sitting at St. Louis, to have confirmed to him 30,000 arpents of land. In 1809, the board rejected the claim.
In 1819, Mackay gave a bond in the nature of a mortgage on 14,000 arpents of the land to Delassus. Papin claimed as assignee of the mortgage, which he caused to be foreclosed, and purchased in the land, and took a title from the sheriff. Massey and others claim under Mackay's heirs.
The Supreme Court of Missouri decided that Papin, claiming under the mortgage of Mackay to Delassus, had a better title than Massey, who claimed under the heirs. And to reverse this decision, this writ of error is prosecuted.
The board of land commissioners of 1809 refused to confirm the claim; they were acting on the title as between the United States and the claimant. The Government had the power to grant the land in fee, regardless of the opinion of the board. Accordingly, in 1832, an act of Congress was passed organizing another board to examine this description of Spanish claims, which had been rejected by the old board. The new board, in October, 1832, recommended the claim for confirmation 'to said James Mackay, or his legal representatives.' James Mackay had died, and his heirs presented the claim the second time; and it is insisted that the confirmation to them by the act of 1836 rejected the mortgage of Delassus, and that the heirs took the unincumbered legal title discharged of the mortgage.
An imperfect Spanish title, claimed by virtue of a concession, was, by the laws of Missouri, subject to sale and assignment, and of course subject to be mortgaged for a debt. The heirs of Mackay took the lands by descent, with the incumbrance attached, and held them in like manner that their ancestor held. The grant of the lands to the heirs by the act of 1836 carried the equities of the mortgagee with the legal title, of which he took the benefit-a consequence contemplated by the mortgage itself; and if the assignment had been in its form a legal conveyance of the lands, the grantee would have taken a legal title. And to this effect are the cases of Bissel v. Penrose, 8 How., and Landes v. Brant, 10 How.
It is ordered that the judgment be affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Massey v. Georgia

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
401 U.S. 964
Massey v. Georgia
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Supreme Court of Georgia
No. 6346.
Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 226 Ga. 703, 177 S.E. 2d 79.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Massey v. Moore

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
348 U.S. 105
Massey v. Moore
Argued: Nov. 8, 1954. --- Decided: Dec 6, 1954
Mr.Dean Acheson, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. James N. Castleberry, Jr., Austin, Tex., for respondent pro hac vice by special leave of Court.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Lloyd, Arthur Morris

​Lloyd, Arthur Morris, equity draftsman and conveyancer, a student of the Middle Temple 21 Jan., 1876, called to the bar 18 Nov., 1878 (2nd son of Morgan Lloyd, of London, Q.C., M,P.); born , 1855.
    53, Cornwall Gardens, S.W.; 4, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Lloyd, Francis Montagu

​Lloyd, Francis Montagu, B.A. Christ Church, Oxon, goes the Oxford circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 6 Nov., 1875 (then aged 22), called to the bar 3 July, 1878 (only son of Francis Lloyd, late puisne judge High Court Bombay); born 26 Oct., 1853.
    9, Stanley Gardens, W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Lloyd, Eyre

​Lloyd, Eyre, B.A., Magdalen Coll., Camb., 1853, a member of the South-eastern circuit, author of Law of Compensation, Success in Laws of Christian Countries, and The Law of Trademarks, a student of the Inner Temple 2g Jan., 1853 (then aged 22), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1859 (3rd son of Eyre Lloyd, Esq., of Prospect Connell, co. Limerick, J.P.); born , 1831.
    6, Serjeants' Inn, Fleet Street. E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Lloyd, Charles Corpe

​Lloyd, Charles Corpe, a student of the Middle Temple 25 May, 1836, called to the bar 7 June, 1839 (eldest son of William Lloyd, Esq,, of Barnet, Herts, dec.); born , .
# Men-at-the-Bar/Lloyd, Charles Dalton Clifford

​Lloyd, Charles Dalton Clifford, lately employed by Government in Egypt, late resident magistrate co. Down, and previously assistant commissioner and registrar-general British Burmah and director of public instruction and deputy commissioner, a student of Lincoln's Inn 3 June, 1872 (then aged 28), called to the bar 7 June, 1875 (eldest son of Col. Robert Clifford Lloyd, late 6th regt. infantry, dec.); born 1844.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Lloyd, Horatio

​Lloyd, Horatio, B.A., Caius Coll., Camb., 1850, judge of county courts (circuit No. 29) since 1874, recorder of Chester since 1866, editor of Leeming and Cross' Practice of Quarter Sessions and of Chitty's Practical Statutes in Administration of Justice, J.P. Cheshire, Chester, Carnarvonshire, and Flintshire, deputy chairman quarter sessions Cheshire, late counsel to Crown on North Wales and Chester circuit for Mint, Post Office, and Inland Revenue and late revising barrister on same circuit, a student of the Middle Temple 28 April, 1849, called to the bar 7 May, 1852 (eldest son of Edward Watson Lloyd, Esq., of Fort Hexwell, Cheshire); born 29 Sept., 1829; married , 1856, Harriette, dau. of late Honoratus Leigh Rigby, Esq., of Hawarden, Flintshire, and has issue.
    Sandowne Terrace, Chester; Grosvenor Club (Chester); Wanderers' Club, S.W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Lloyd, Clement Elphinstone

​Lloyd, Clement Elphinstone, B.A. St. John's Coll., Oxon, from Winchester Coll., junior counsel to the Mint and Post Office on the North Wales and Chester circuit 1884, author of Lloyd's Practice of the Supreme Court, editor of Morgan Lloyd's Law and Practice of the County Courts, 8th edition, a student of the Inner Temple 2 May, 1873 (then aged 21), called to the bar 28 June, 1876 (eldest son of Morgan Lloyd, Q.C., M.P.); born 5 Sept., 1851.
    4, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.