OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Sullivan v. Kidd

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
254 U.S. 433
Sullivan v. Kidd
Argued: and Submitted April 27, 1920. ---
Restored to Docket for Reargument May 17, 1920.
Reargued Dec. 10, 1920.
Decided Jan. 3, 1921.
Messrs. George F. Beatty and B. I. Litowich, both of Salina, Kan., for appellants.
Messrs. H. M. Langworthy, O. H. Dean, and Roy B. Thomson, all of Kansas City, Mo., and J. H. Ralston, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from page 434 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Solicitor General Frierson, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for the United States (by special leave of court).
Mr. Justice DAY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tangled Hair/A Garment

A Garment
If it were a matter of two garments, To take off one would be simple. Do not preach such obvious reasoning.
Now what I have is one, Only one garment to be shared with ten. After all what am I to do?
# Tangled Hair/A Mouse

A Mouse
In the attic of my house dwells a mouse. The creaking noise he makes Reminds me of a sculptor who carves An image all night long.
Again when he dances about with his wife, He whirls around with the vigor of a race horse. Though the dirt and dust of the attic flutter down On the paper as I write, How should he know?
But I stop to think: I am living with mice. Let there be good food And a cozy nest for them. In the ceiling, let them, from time to time, Drill a hole and peep down on me.
# Tangled Hair

The second volume of the Modern Japanese Poets Series.
Modern Japanese Poets Series
Volume Two
Tangled Hair
Akiko Yosano
1912
translated from the works of the poet
Akiko Yosano
by
Shio Sakanishi, Ph.D.
Marshall Jones Company
Boston
Copyright, 1935 by Marshall Jones Company
First Edition
December, 1935
Printed in the United States of America
To
Pauli Lyman
Modern Japanese Poets Series
Already Published
I • Takuboku Ishikawa: A Handful of Sand
II • Akiko Yosano: Tangled Hair
In Preparation
III • Sachio Ito
IV • Akahiko Shimaki
V • Hakushu Kitahara
VI • Mokichi Saito
Preface
Western students of Japanese literature know little of the renaissance of poetic inspiration which originated during the closing years of the nineteenth century. It produced such significant writers as Takuboku Ishikawa, Sachio Ito, and Akahiko Shimaki, and among the living poets Mrs. Akiko Yosano, Hakushu Kitahara, and Dr. Mokichi Saito who are the leaders of their own schools. The purpose of the Modern Japanese Poets Series is to introduce them.
The present volume, the second of the series, includes a small but significant portion of Akiko Yosano’s work. The only poetess in the series represents the romantic school of modern Japanese poetry, and is not a stranger in the West. The first one hundred twenty-two poems are in the classical form of thirty-one syllables, while the last fifteen are in the longer modern mode, which actually is formless. I have aimed at ​a scrupulously exact and literal translation, and tried to retain as far as possible the rhythm of the original. I have refrained from the use of rhyme, a restriction which necessarily hampers literalness and gives an air of artificiality.
To Lilian E. Knowles for many valuable suggestions, to Miss Agnes DeLano and Donald Goodchild for assisting me in the revision of the manuscript, and to Miss Suzanne Webb for the pencil sketch of Akiko Yosano after the Miroir, I wish to express my deep indebtedness.
S. S.
       November, 1935
       Library of Congress
Contents
Portraits in Clay
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Tangled Hair/A Man at the Back Door

A Man at the Back Door
A drunken gentleman in tattered clothes Settled himself down at my kitchen door.
Do not disturb him: let him alone. To call him a beggar is unkind. The dishevelled hair and the blue eyes— He is the exact image of Baudelaire.
# Tangled Hair/Birth and Death

Birth and Death
As, ailing, I moan helplessly, The primrose beside me Trembles.
Here in the white hospital room I seem to be lying in the snow Or to be buried alive in a cave.
Stranger than the two suns In the heavens are The three hearts Beating in my body.
When the speechless devil, Like a dark shadow, Shakes its fist, The infants in my womb Bite their mother.
Fighting with its mother and twin sister, A frail infant has exhausted its strength And, alas, perishes in my womb.
My last child Clad in his garments Of pale pink and lavender Sleeps deep in his coffin.
For my child Let there be a happier land Than the little death bed Encircled by the four panels of a screen.
# Tangled Hair/Cool Evening

Cool Evening
On all sides of the balcony Stars are gleaming. Tonight’s moon is a Chinese actor. In the rôle of gentle Shanshi He hides his face with a white silk fan, And sings serenely “Autumn.”
# Tang Tun v. Edsell

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
223 U.S. 673
Tang Tun v. Edsell
Argued: and submitted November 7, 1911. --- Decided: March 11, 1912
Mr. James A. Kerr for petitioners.
Assistant Attorney General Harr for respondent.
Mr. Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tangled Hair/A Lotus Barge

A Lotus Barge
O sir priests, rowing back In your barge in the evening late! Pray, of which lotus flowers have you more, The red or the white?
A barge shoots down the stream! The shrine on whose wall the night before I scribbled a poem by the light of the moon, Swiftly disappears.
In essay I touched with my young lips The dewdrops on the lotus flowers. How cool they were!
As to good and evil, Ask those behind me on the bank. I, for one, ride and play On a hurricane.
Picking up the Holy Scriptures Which I had cast into the depths, Again I look up to the sky and wail. I am a bewildered child.
If today be full And today be abundant, I am glad to die today. Tomorrow and yesterday Are names I know not.
I talk not of the way, Think not of the future, And ask nothing of fame. Here we meet face to face, My love and I.
For your sake and for mine own, And for days of youth together we spent, I let fall hot tears of gladness And cold tears of sadness.
How pleasing is The crumbling sound of the castle Which my foolish heart had built!
Let me fade As the spring day fades, Or fall like the peacock’s feathers Of green and gold.
Swifter than a hail-storm, Lighter than a feather, A gentle melancholy Passes over my soul.
# Tangled Hair/Dream-Flowers

Dream-Flowers
Amidst the dark Of my past life There glows a crimson light Out of my twentieth year.
Lovely was the shooting star As my love and I Walked across the plain Where the crickets sang.
The sting of death lies in this: We may not take with us A golden casket Filled with memories of love.
“Do not lose yourself At the forked way of life, O young man!” So saying, I closed one path with a stone.
Every time my love Hears the ridicule of the world, He lays down his pen And broods.
I am never more forlorn Than when I watch the wavering Of the heart of the man I love— Though my eyes see it not.
When I take up my pen to write to him, A woman out of her mind Shrieks and wails In the world upon the paper.
Ink has stained my weary fingers. I shall now stop writing My resentful thoughts And go to sleep.
Strange that you should divide Our love into two halves, When I make one perfect whole.
I shall snatch the thunder And throw it at the man. He deems me weak and helpless.
I say to you not a word. Know that you are facing a mountain. ’Tis the punishment I lay upon you this half-day.
At last I made my love confess That two women share his heart. With that knowledge gained, alas, I now repent my foolish art.
An ice cold wind Passed between you and me, And the distance of a foot Became a thousand miles.
O this dreary struggle That lurks in our home! You beat yourself And I myself.
Though we watch the ship-wreck Between us two, You raise not your hand in rescue, Nor I mine.
Had I not fulfilled this love, What then would have been my fate? Though such wondering is vain and foolish, Still—
Although this self denies life In a world yet to come, It still creates a dream-world That could never exist in this.
When I bemoan the agony of living, Sweet is the taste of tears That stream down my cheeks.
# Southern Railway Company v. City of Durham

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
266 U.S. 178
Southern Railway Company v. City of Durham
Argued: Oct. 14, 1924. --- Decided: Nov 17, 1924
Messrs. W. M. Hendren, of Winston-Salem, N. C., F. M. Rivinus and Theodore W. Reath, both of Philadelphia, Pa., James F. Wright, of Norfolk, Va., and L. E. Jeffries, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. James S. Manning, of Raleigh, N. C., and S.C.. Chambers, of Durham, N. C., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Southern Railway Company v. City of Durham/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
266 U.S. 178
Southern Railway Company v. City of Durham
Argued: Oct. 14, 1924. --- Decided: Nov 17, 1924
By ordinance the city council of Durham declared a certain grade crossing dangerous and ordered plaintiffs in error to eliminate it by constructing an underpass with proper approaches, etc. They failed to comply; the city instituted a mandamus proceeding to compel obedience.
The petition, after setting out the facts and circumstances, asked an appropriate decree. Answering, plaintiffs in error attacked the ordinance as arbitrary, unreasonable and subdiversive of rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment; also because it conflicted with the federal Act to Regulate Commerce (Comp. St. § 8563 et seq.) by imposing undue expense upon them. The facts relied upon to support these claims were specified.
Having heard the cause upon complaint, answers and argument of counsel the trial court, 'being of the opinion that no issue of fact for trial by jury is raised upon the pleadings,' made findings of fact, declared the ordinance valid and directed compliance therewith. The railroads offered no evidence, but asked continuation of the cause until the next term and that no further proceedings should be taken until the issues of fact raised by the answers could be decided by a jury. This was denied and they appealed. The Supreme Court held refusal to continue the hearing and transfer the cause to the civil docket for trial by jury was not erroneous, and said that 'the judge was ready to hear and determine the action but the railroads failed to offer testimony or evidence of any kind whatever.'
We are unable to find that plaintiffs in error have been deprived of any federal right. They had full opportunity to present evidence to support their contentions in the trial court, but offered none. Neither federal laws nor Constitution gave them the right to demand trial by jury when the local statutes and practice prescribed otherwise. The ordinary rule applies, and we accept the ruling of the Supreme Court as to the local law. First National Bank v. Weld County, 264 U.S. 450, 454, 44 S.C.t. 385, 68 L. Ed. 784.
Affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Southern Railway Company v. Carson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
194 U.S. 136
Southern Railway Company v. Carson
Argued: April 4, 1904. --- Decided: April 18, 1904
Carson, a resident of Greenville county, South Carolina, brought this suit in the court of common pleas of that county against the Southern Railway Company, a corporation chartered under the laws of the state of Virginia, and engaged in running trains through several states as a common carrier, and J. C. Arwood and J. D. Miller, residents of Greenville county, to recover damages for personal injuries, which, he charged in his complaint, 'were due to the joint and concurrent negligence, carelessness, and fault of the defendants, and to their joint and concurrent recklessness, carelessness, wilfulness, and wanton disregard of the plaintiff's rights and safety, in the following manner, to wit:'-setting forth the circumstances of his cause of action. Among other things, plaintiff alleged that he was a flagman in the employment of the Southern Railway Company, and on the day of the accident was ordered by Arwood, the conductor in charge of a certain freight train, on which Miller was engineer, to do the work of brakeman, and to couple some of the cars in the train; that these cars were provided with automatic couplers, but one of them was not in proper condition, which rendered it necessary for plaintiff to go between the cars to effect the coupling; and that the accident thereupon happened by reason of defendants' 'joint and concurrent carelessness, negligence, recklessness,' etc., in particulars detailed.
Defendants severally demurred, the demurrers were overruled, and defendants excepted. Defendants then answered severally, in identical terms, denying all negligence on the part of defendant, and asserting 'that the plaintiff's alleged injury was the result of his own negligence.' Trial was had and the jury found for plaintiff, against the railway company, judgment was entered, and the railway company appealed to the supreme court of the state. That court affirmed the judgment (46 S. E. 525), and thereupon this writ of error was allowed.
Messrs. W. A. Henderson and T. P. Cothran for plaintiff in error.
Mr. J. Altheus Johnson for defendant in error.
Statement by Mr. Chief Justice Fuller:
Mr. Chief Justice Fuller delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Southern Railway Company v. Burlington Lumber Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
225 U.S. 99
Southern Railway Company v. Burlington Lumber Company
Argued: and submitted May 3, 1912. --- Decided: May 27, 1912
Messrs. John K. Graves and Alfred P. Thom for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Lee S. Overman and W. H. Carroll for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Southern Railway Company v. Burlington Lumber Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
225 U.S. 99
Southern Railway Company v. Burlington Lumber Company
Argued: and submitted May 3, 1912. --- Decided: May 27, 1912
This is an action to recover penalties under a statute of North Carolina for refusal to receive goods for shipment. As the statute is the same that was held bad, so far as it concerns commerce among the states, in Southern R. Co. v. Reid, 222 U.S. 424, 56 L. ed. 257, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 140, and Southern R. Co. v. Reid, 222 U.S. 444, 56 L. ed. 263, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 145, a short statement will be enough. On January 26, 1907, the Burlington Lumber Company tendered to the railway company at Burlington, North Carolina, certain machinery for shipment to Saginaw, Michigan, on a through bill of lading. Saginaw was not on the railway company's line, the company had no rates to Saginaw, and the agent had to delay in order to inquire of his superiors. The result was that the through bill of lading was not issued until April 3. The suit, as we have said, is for the penalty, and nothing else. The supreme court of the state decided against the railway on the same ground that it did in the decisions already reversed. In the circumstances it seems unnecessary to discuss the case more at length.
Judgment reversed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Southern Railway Company v. Campbell

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
239 U.S. 99
Southern Railway Company v. Campbell
Argued: November 4, 1915. --- Decided: November 15, 1915
Messrs. John K. Graves and L. E. Jeffries for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. John G. Capers and William G. Sirrine for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 100 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# The Acts and Monuments of John Foxe/Volume 3/Answer of the Bishop of Luthonis, to the last Part of the Supplication which the Nobles of Bohemia presented unto the Council

Layout 2
Moreover, by the report and fame which goeth here abroad, and by the writings which were sent over unto me, I have propounded that it came to my knowledge, that the blood of Christ is carried about in vessels not consecrated, approving the aforesaid erroneous assertion of the Wiclevists, who affirm it necessary for salvation, that the people should communicate under both kinds of bread and wine; and that it is necessary, as the body of Christ is carried in the pix or box, so the blood of Christ should be carried in bottles, or other necessary vessels, from place to place, and especially about the ministration of the sick. Also I declared not of myself, but I heard it to be declared by others, both great and credible persons, that there was a certain woman, a follower of that sect, who, taking by violence the body of Christ out of a priest's hands, did communicate unto herself, and affirmed that all men ought to do so, if the priests should deny them the communion. And the same woman, amongst many other errors of the which she was convicted, did affirm that a good lay-woman might better consecrate and give absolution, than an evil priest; affirming that an evil priest can neither consecrate nor absolve. But I know that neither I, nor any of my assistants in this matter, have brought this at any time unto your ears, that cobblers in the said kingdom do hear confession, or minister the sacrament of the body of Christ, as is alleged by the said Peter, in behalf of the said supplicants. Notwithstanding that, we did fear, if means were not found to recounter or stop the offences before named, that this would immediately follow upon it. Wherefore, most reverend fathers! lest that the kingdom might be defamed any more by such pestiferous sects, and that the christian faith might happen to be endangered, with all reverence and charity, I do desire you, even by the bowels of mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ, that this most sacred council would provide some speedy remedy for this kingdom, as touching the premises.
Answer of the bishop confuted.The day before Whitsuntide, the nobles of Bohemia did confute this answer, made two days before in the council to their former writing, as here followeth.
# The Acts and Monuments of John Foxe/Volume 3/Another right godly Letter of John Huss to a certain Priest, admonishing him of his Office, and exhorting him to be faithful; worthy to be read of all Ministers

Layout 2
# The Acts and Monuments of John Foxe/Volume 3/Another Letter of John Huss to his Friends of Bohemia

Layout 2
Another Letter of John Huss to his Friends of Bohemia.
O how comfortable was the giving of the hand of lord John de Clum unto me, who was not ashamed to reach forth his hand to me a wretch, and such an abject heretic, lying in fetters of iron, and cried out upon of all men! Now peradventure, I shall not speak much hereafter with you: therefore salute in time, as you shall see them all, the faithful of Bohemia.
Paletz came to me in prison. His salutation in my vehement infirmity was this, before the commissaries: that there hath not risen a more perilous heretic since Christ was born, than were Wickliff and I. Also he said, that all such as came to hear my talk were infected with this heresy, to think that the substance of bread remained in the sacrament of the altar. To whom I answered and said: 'O master! what a grievous salutation have you given me, and how greatly do you sin! Behold I shall die, or peradventure to-morrow shall be burnt; and what reward shall be recompensed to you in Bohemia for your labour.'
This thing, peradventure, I should not have written, lest I might seem to hate ​him. I have always had this in my heart: 'Trust not in princes,' &c. And again: 'Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh to be his arm.' For God's sake be you circumspect how you stand and how you return. Carry no letters with you. Direct your books not all by one, but diversely by divers friends.
The visions of John Huss by dreams.Know this for certain, that I have had great conflicts by dreams, in such sort, as I had much ado to refrain from crying out. For I dreamed of the pope's escape before he went. And after the lord John had told me thereof, immediately in the night it was told me, that the pope should return to you again. And afterwards also I dreamed of the apprehending of Master Jerome, although not in full manner as it was done. All the imprisonments, whither and how I am carried, were opened to me before, although not fully after the same form and circumstance. Many serpents oftentimes appeared unto me, having heads also in their tail; but none of them could bite me, and many other things more.
And shortly after the writing hereof, he sendeth also unto them another prophetical vision of his, to be expounded, touching the reformation of the church, written in his forty-fourth epistle, the contents whereof be these.