OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Notable South Australians/John Gardiner

Layout 2
John Gardiner,
WHO was for many years secretary of the Mount Gambler Institute, was a man who had passed through the most varied experiences. He was in the 9th Royal Lancers for a long time, and subsequently in the German Legion. Served fifteen years in India in the Punjaub, at Chillianwallah, and Sobraon, and received for services rendered numerous decorations. He was an able taxidermist. At the time of his death, which took place at Mount Gambler on June 28, 1869, he was in his 49th year of age.
# Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009/Division G
## DIVISION G — Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2009

    Title I — Legislative Branch Appropriations
    Title II — General Provisions
This division may be cited as the ``Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2009´´.
# Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009/Division H
## DIVISION H — Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2009

    Title I — Department of State and Related Agency
    Title II — United States Agency for International Development
    Title III — Bilateral Economic Assistance
    Title IV — International Security Assistance
    Title V — Multilateral Assistance
    Title VI — Export and Investment Assistance
    Title VII — General Provisions
This division may be cited as the ``Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2009´´.
# Notes on the folk-lore of the northern counties of England and the borders/Index

INDEX.
ERRATUM.
In page 4, note $^1$, line 2, for Dæmonium, read Dæmonum.
Westminster: Printed by Nichols and Sons, 25, Parliament Street.
# Notes upon Russia

* Volume 1 (scan)
* Volume 2 (scan)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Notes upon Russia/Volume 1

WORKS ISSUED BY
The Hakluyt Society
NOTES UPON RUSSIA.
VOL. I.
M.DCCC.LI
THE BARON SIGISMUND VON HERBERSTEIN
In his State Dress, as Ambassador from the Emperor Maximilian to the Grand Duke Vasiley Ivanovich.
From an Original Drawing in the Grenville Library.
NOTES UPON RUSSIA:
BEING A TRANSLATION OF THE
Earliest Account of that Country,
ENTITLED
RERUM MOSCOVITICARUM COMMENTARII,
BY THE BARON
SIGISMUND VON HERBERSTEIN,
AMBASSADOR FROM THE COURT OF GERMANY TO THE GRAND PRINCE VASILEY IVANOVICH, IN THE YEARS 1517 AND 1526.
TRANSLATED AND EDITED,
With Notes and an Introduction,
BY
R. H. MAJOR,
OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM
VOL. I
"—if thou list to know the Russes well.
To Sigismundus booke repayre, who all the trueth can tell."
Turbervile. 1568.
LONDON:
PRINTED FOR THE HAKLUYT SOCIETY.
M.DCCC.LI.
LONDON:
RICHARDS, 37, GREAT QUEEN STREET, LINCOLN'S INN.
ERRATA.
| Introduction, | page vi, | line 8, | for “1599-60”, read “1599-1600”. |
| Introduction,„ | ix, | 30, | for “Royal”, read “Royale”. |
| Introduction,„ | xxi, | 14, | for “Aut.”, read “Ant.” |
| Introduction,„ | xxviii, | Note, | for “Humbolt”, read “Humboldt”. |
| Introduction,„ | lxxi, | 12, | for “Weid”, read “Wied”. |
| Introduction,„ | lxxxviii, | 3, | for “Polschaftn”, read “Potschaftn”. |
THE HAKLUYT SOCIETY.
SIR RODERICK IMPEY MURCHISON, G.C.St.S., F.R.S., Corr. Mem. Inst. Fr., Hon. Mem. Imp. Acad. Sc. St. Petersburg, &c., &c., President.
| The EARL OF ELLESMERE. | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | Vice-Presidents. |
| Capt. C. R. DRINKWATER BETHUNE, R.N., C.B. | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | Vice-Presidents. |
| Rear-Admiral Sir FRANCIS BEAUFORT, K.C.B. | | |
| CHARLES T. BEKE, Esq., Phil. D., F.S.A. | | |
| The LORD ALFRED S. CHURCHILL. | | |
| WILLIAM DESBOROUGH COOLEY, Esq. | | |
| BOLTON CORNEY, Esq., M.R.S.L. | | |
| The Right Rev. LORD BISHOP OF ST. DAVID'S. | | |
| The Viscount EASTNOR. | | |
| Sir HENRY ELLIS, K.H., F.R.S. | | |
| RICHARD FORD, Esq. | | |
| JOHN FORSTER, Esq. | | |
| R. W. GREY, Esq., M.P. | | |
| THOMAS HODGKIN, ESQ., M.D. | | |
| JOHN WINTER JONES, Esq. | | |
| Sir CHARLES LEMON, Bart., M.P. | | |
| P. LEVESQUE, Esq. | | |
| THOMAS RUNDALL, Esq. | | |
| The Hon. HENRY E. J. STANLEY. | | |
R. H. MAJOR, Esq., F.R.G.S., Honorary Secretary.
TO
SIR HENRY ELLIS, K.H.
ETC. ETC. ETC.
AS TO HIS EARLIEST SURVIVING FRIEND,
AND THE SUGGESTER OF THIS TRANSLATION,
THE FOLLOWING PAGES ARE INSCRIBED,
WITH EVERY SENTIMENT OF
GRATEFUL AFFECTION AND RESPECT,
BY
THE EDITOR.
* Preface
* Introduction
* Certaine Letters in Verse
* Dedication
* To the Reader
* Notes upon Russia
# On the Eve/XXVII

XXVII
Bersenyev's words turned out only partly true; the danger was over, but Insarov gained strength slowly, and the doctor talked of a complete undermining of the whole system. The patient left his bed for all that, and began to walk about the room; Bersenyev went home to his own lodging, but he came every day to his still feeble friend; and every day as before he informed Elena of the state of his health. Insarov did not dare to write to her, and only indirectly in his conversations with Bersenyev referred to her; but Bersenyev, with assumed carelessness, told him about his visits to the Stahovs, trying, however, to give him to understand that Elena had been deeply distressed, and that now she was calmer. Elena too did not write to Insarov; she had a plan in her head.
One day Bersenyev had just informed her with a cheerful face that the doctor had already allowed Insarov to eat a cutlet, and that he would probably soon go out; she seemed absorbed, dropped her eyes.
'Guess, what I want to say to you,' she said. Bersenyev was confused. He understood her.
'I suppose,' he answered, looking away, 'you want to say that you wish to see him.'
Elena crimsoned, and scarcely audibly, she breathed, 'Yes.'
'Well, what then? That, I imagine, you can easily do.'—'Ugh!' he thought, 'what a loath-some feeling there is in my heart!'
'You mean that I have already before . . .' said Elena. 'But I am afraid—now he is, you say, seldom alone.'
'That's not difficult to get over,' replied Bersenyev, still not looking at her. 'I, of course, cannot prepare him; but give me a note. Who can hinder your writing to him as a good friend, in whom you take an interest? There's no harm in that. Appoint—I mean, write to him when you will come.
'I am ashamed,' whispered Elena.
'Give me the note, I will take it.'
'There's no need of that, but I wanted to ask you—don't be angry with me, Andrei Petrovitch—don't go to him to-morrow!'
Bersenyev bit his lip.
'Ah! yes, I understand; very well, very well,' and, adding two or three words more, he quickly took leave.
'So much the better, so much the better,' he thought, as he hurried home. 'I have learnt nothing new, but so much the better. What possessed me to go hanging on to the edge of another man's happiness? I regret nothing; I have done what my conscience told me; but now it is over. Let them be! My father was right when he used to say to me: "You and I, my dear boy, are not Sybarites, we are not aristocrats, we're not the spoilt darlings of fortune and nature, we are not even martyrs—we are workmen and nothing more. Put on your leather apron, workman, and take your place at your workman's bench, in your dark workshop, and let the sun shine on other men! Even our dull life has its own pride, its own happiness!"'
The next morning Insarov got a brief note by the post. 'Expect me,' Elena wrote to him, 'and give orders for no one to see you. A. P. will not come.'
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIII/Gregory the Great/Book IX/Letter 44

Epistle CV.
To Serenus Bishop of Massilia (Marseilles).
Gregory to Serenus, &c.
That we have been so long in sending a letter to your Fraternity attribute not to sluggishness, but to press of business. We now commend to you in all respects the bearer of these presents, our most beloved son Cyriacus, the Father of our Monastery, that no delay may detain him in the city of Massilia, but that he may proceed under God’s protection to our brother and fellow-bishop Syagrius with the succour of your Holiness.
Furthermore we notify to you that it has come to our ears that your Fraternity, seeing certain adorers of images, broke and threw down these same images in Churches. And we commend you indeed for your zeal against anything made with hands being an object of adoration; but we signify to you that you ought not to have broken these images. For pictorial representation is made use of in Churches for this reason; that such as are ignorant of letters may at least read by looking at the walls what they cannot read in books. Your Fraternity therefore should have both preserved the images and prohibited the people from adoration of them, to the end that both those who are ignorant of letters might have wherewith to gather a knowledge of the history, and that the people might by no means sin by adoration of a pictorial representation.

## Footnotes

* ↑ It appears from Epistle CIX. below that Cyriacus was being now sent to the bishop of Autun with the special view of getting a synod called by queen Brunechild for restraining the simony and other ecclesiastical irregularities which were prevalent in Gaul. Cf. also above, IX. II, to Brunechild.
* ↑ Cf. XI. 13.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIII/Gregory the Great/Book IX/Letter 5

Epistle V.
To Marcellus, Pro-Consul of Dalmatia.
Gregory to Marcellus, &c.
We have received the letter of your Greatness, in which you speak of having incurred our displeasure, and of your wish to be in favour with us through direct satisfaction. And indeed we have heard such things of your Greatness as ought never to have been committed by a faithful man. For all assert that you are the author of all that great mischief in the case of Maximus, and that the spoiling of that Church, and the perdition of so many souls, and the audacity of that unheard-of presumption, had their beginning through you. And indeed, with regard to your seeking to be in favour with us, it is fitting that with your whole heart and soul, and with tears, as becomes you, you should satisfy our Redeemer for such things as these: for, unless satisfaction is made to Him, what certain good can our forgiveness or favour do thee? But while we observe thee to be still implicated in the ruinous conduct of pretenders, or in the advocacy of those who have gone astray, we see not of what sort your satisfaction is either to God or men. For then your Greatness may know that you openly and evidently satisfy God and men, when you bring back both what is devious to rectitude and what is presumptuous to the rule of humility. If this is done, you may know that you will thus be in favour both with God and men.

## Footnotes

* ↑ See III. 47, note 2.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIII/Gregory the Great/Book IX/Letter 50

Epistle CXI.
To Virgilius, Bishop of Arelate (Arles).
Gregory to Virgilius, &c.
Inasmuch as the desire of a pious purpose and the bent of a laudable devotion ought always to be aided by the earnest endeavours of priests, anxious care should be taken that neither remissness, neglect nor presumption disturb whatever has been ordained for the quiet of monks and of religious conversation. But, as it was right that what reason required should be profitably prescribed, so what has been prescribed ought not to be violated. Now Childebert of glorious memory, King of the Franks, inflamed by love of the Catholic religion, in founding for his own reward a monastery for men within the walls of the city of Arelate, as we find set down in writing, granted certain things there for the sustentation of its inmates. And, lest his purpose should ever be frustrated, and what had been arranged for the quiet of the monks be disturbed, he prayed in his letters that whatever rights he conceded to the said monastery might be confirmed by apostolical authority; adding this also to his petition, that certain privileges might at the same time be accorded to the same monastery, as well in the management of its affairs as in the ordination of its abbot.  This he did as knowing such reverence to be paid by the faithful to the Apostolic See that what had been settled by its decree no molestation of unlawful usurpation would thereafter shake. Hence, since the royal purpose as well as the thing desired, urgently demanded effect to be given to it, letters were sent by our predecessor Vigilius, bishop of the Roman See, to your predecessor Aurelius, wherein all things that a desire to embrace that purpose demanded were willingly confirmed by the support of apostolical authority, inasmuch as a thing of this kind, when requested, could not be allowed to encounter difficulty.  But, that your Fraternity may know what was decreed at that time, we have seen to the written orders of our aforesaid predecessor being added to this letter. These having been perused, we exhort thee to keep them all inviolate with priestly earnestness, as becomes thee, and to allow nothing undue or unlawful to be imposed on that monastery, or the said orders to be infringed by any usurpation. For, though what has once been sanctioned by the authority of the Apostolic See has no lack of validity, yet we do, over and above, once more corroborate by our authority in all respects all things that were ordained by our predecessor for quiet in this matter. Let your Fraternity, then, so acquit yourself in observing them as both to shut out all occasion of disturbance, and also to persuade others to carry these things out, while you shew yourself careful and devoted, as becomes you, in observing the most pious will of the departed one.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume XIII/Gregory the Great/Book IX/Letter 52

Epistle CXV.
To Syagrius, Bishop of Augustodunum (Autun).
Gregory to Syagrius, &c.
If in secular affairs every man should have his right and his proper rank preserved to him, how much more in ecclesiastical arrangements ought no confusion to be let in; lest discord should find place there, whence the blessings of peace should proceed. And this will in this way be secured, if nothing is yielded to power but all to equity.
Now it has been reported to us that our most beloved brother Ursicinus, bishop of the city of Taurini, after the captivity and plunder which he endured, has suffered serious prejudice in his parishes, which are said to be situated within the boundaries of the Franks, even to the extent of another person being constituted bishop there in contravention of ecclesiastical ordinances, no crime of his demanding it. And, lest this prejudicial proceeding should perchance seem to be a light matter, there has been also some hardship added in the taking from him of the property of his Church which he might have held. Now, if these things are really so, seeing that it is a very cruel thing and opposed to the sacred canons, that the ambition of any should remove from his own altar an innocent priest who does not deserve to be superseded on account of crime, let all regard his cause as their own, and strive against the imposition on others of what they would be unwilling to endure themselves. For if the entrance for an evil thing is not closed before it has been long open, it grows wider by use; and what is evidently forbidden by reason will be allowed by custom. But, beyond all others, let the solicitude of your Fraternity, in consideration of our commendation and your own sense of what you owe to God, devote itself earnestly to his defence, and not allow him to be any longer removed against reason from his parishes. But, as well in your own person as by making supplication to the most excellent kings, whom we believe to cause you no sadness in any respect, do you bring it about that this thing which has been done amiss may be corrected, and that what has been taken away by force may under the patronage of truth be restored; for, seeing that it is written, A brother helping a brother shall be exalted (Prov. xviii. 19), your Charity may know that it will receive by so much the more from Almighty God as His precepts shall have been gladly and constantly executed in helping a brother.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Augusta Taurinarum, the modern Turin.
* ↑ In parochiis suis Though the term παροικία meant originally what we should now call a bishop’s whole diocese, it came after the third century to be applied to parishes within such diocese. Hence here parochiis in the plural. Cf. Bingham, Bk. IX., ch. ii., sect. 1; Ch. viii., Sect. 1.
* ↑ Viz. Theoderic and Theodebert (see VI. 58, note 1), to whom a letter on the same subject was sent at the same time, viz., Ep. CXVI., which follows. The former would be in this year (a.d. 598–9) about ten, and the latter about thirteen years of age.
# On the Will in Nature/Editor's Preface to the Third Edition

​Schopenhauer has left an interleaved copy of his work "On the Will in Nature," as well as of his other writings, and has inserted in it those Corrections and additions which he intended to use for the Third Edition. I have therefore included them in this Third Edition.
The Corrections chiefly concern the style, here and there an expression being changed, and a word inserted or omitted. The additions, on the contrary, concern the matter of the book; they amplify it more or less considerably, and are tolerably numerous.
The Corrections are incorporated by Schopenhauer with the text; whereas the additions are designated by him as "Notes" (Anmerkungen) to be placed at the foot of the pages with the words, "added to the third edition." They will therefore be found at the places indicated by him for them, as foot-notes; and thus the reader will be enabled easily to discern how much has been added in this edition.
As to the value of the present work, Schopenhauer has expressed himself as follows in the "World as Will and Representation:"
"It would be a great mistake to consider the statements of other people, with which I have connected my own exposition there (in the work "On the Will in Nature"), as the real substance and argument of that work which, though ​small in size, is weighty in import. The statements of other people are rather a mere occasion which I take as my starting-point in order to expound the fundamental truth of my doctrine more clearly there than has been done anywhere else, and to apply it all the way down even to the empirical knowledge of Nature. This I have done most exhaustively and stringently under the heading "Physical Astronomy," nor can I ever hope to find a more correct or accurate expression for the kernel of my doctrine than the one given there."
I have nothing to add to testimony thus given by Schopenhauer himself.
             Julius Frauenstädt.
Berlin, March, 1867.
# On the Will in Nature/Editor's Preface to the Fourth Edition

​The present Fourth Edition is an identical reprint of the Third: it therefore contains the same corrections and additions which I had already inserted in the Third Edition from Schopenhauer's own manuscript.
             Julius Frauenstädt.
Berlin, September, 1877.
# Notes of my Captivity in Russia

Layout 2
NOTES
OF
MY CATIVITY IN RUSSIA,
in the years 1794, 1795, and 1796.
NOTES
OF
MY CAPTIVITY IN RUSSIA,
IN THE YEARS 1794, 1795, AND 1796.
BY
J. U. NIEMCEWICZ,
SENATOR-CASTELLAN OF THE KINGDOM OF POLAND,
PRESIDENT OF THE ROYAL SCIENTIFIC AND
LITERARY SOCIETY OF WARSAW, &c.
TRANSLATED FROM THE ORIGINAL,
BY
ALEXANDER LASKI,
CAPTAIN IN THE LATE POLISH ARMY.
EDINBURGH:
WILLIAM TAIT, 107, PRINCE'S STREET;
SIMPKIN, MARSHALL, & CO., LONDON.
MDCCCXLIV.
CONTENTS.
| | Page |
| CHAPTER I. ||
| THE BATTLE OF MACIEIOWICE, | 1 |
| CHAPTER II. ||
| ITINERARY OF THE PRISONERS, | 40 |
| CHAPTER III. ||
| EXAMINATION OF THE PRISONERS, | 103 |
| CHAPTER IV. ||
| COMPANIONS IN CAPTIVITY, | 141 |
| CHAPTER V. ||
| PRISON LIFE, | 168 |
| CHAPTER VI. ||
| THE RELEASE, | 196 |
# Notes on equitation and horse training/Question 7

See also the original scanned version (page images with accompanying text)

## VII.

The halt—How to halt a young horse.—To halt, lean back slightly and pull on the reins with gradually increasing force, in order to slow and then stop movement.
When the trooper pulls on the reins the horse should neither raise nor lower the head. The muzzle should remain to the front and the whole mass of the neck should flow back toward the withers. In other words, under the action of the reins the horse should neither throw his nose up in the air nor bring it down against his chest, closing up on the hand. This latter fault is particularly to be avoided. It is more difficult to raise the muzzle than to lower it, and any horse that at the beginning of training withdraws from neck control becomes especially difficult to instruct.
Should halts be frequent?—The halt should not be frequently practiced on horses inclined to fret nor on those with hind legs set under and thus liable to sit down on the haunches. On the contrary, it should be often used in cases where the conformation throws too much weight on the shoulders. Training is nothing more than the quest of balance, and the halt will be a well-chosen suppling exercise for a horse with a high, powerful croup that makes him difficult to slow up.
The change of direction—Aids to use.—To change direction to the right, open gently the right rein by carrying the wrist to the front and right, without moving the elbow and without twisting the hand.
The effect of opening must be produced laterally and as little as possible from front to rear. It induces a movement of the haunches and furnishes, therefore, a
​preliminary means of accustoming the horse to yield to the pressure of one leg.
To change direction to the right, then, the aids to be used are the right rein and the right leg.
In the first lesson the turning movement will not be executed with precision, but this is of small importance.
It is not a question of bending the horse on a quarter circle as should be done with a trained horse; all that is necessary is to make the horse understand what action results from the opening of one rein and the closing of one leg.
* ↑ When the leg and rein on the same side are used as aids, they are called lateral aids; thus, also, lateral effects and lateral equitation.—The Board.
# Notes on the Anti-Corn Law Struggle

* related portals: Corn Laws.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
NOTES
ON THE
ANTI-CORN LAW STRUGGLE.
BY
ANDREW BISSET.
WILLIAMS AND NORGATE, 14, HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN, LONDON; AND 20, SOUTH FREDERICK STREET, EDINBURGH. 1884.
LONDON: G. NORMAN AND SON, PRINTERS, HART STREET, COVENT GARDEN.
CONTENTS. :
| | page |
| Introduction | 1 |
| CHAPTER I. ||
| Was the Repeal of the Corn Laws the Effect of Oratory? | 14 |
| CHAPTER II. ||
| Thomas Perronet Thompson | 36 |
| CHAPTER III. ||
| Charles Pelham Villiers | 86 |
| CHAPTER IV. ||
| The Landlords | 178 |
| CHAPTER V. ||
| Section 1.—Peasant Life | 211 |
| Section 2.—An English Village in 1844-5 | 223 |
| Section 3.—A Scottish Village in 1855 | 239 |
| CHAPTER VI. ||
| Free Trade and the Channel Tunnel | 257 |
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Once a Week (magazine)/Series 1/Volume 7/Heimkehr (The return)

Translation of “Heimkehr.”
HEIMKEHR (THE RETURN).
FROM THE GERMAN OF EMMANUEL GEIBEL.
That was a day of bitter smart, The day that witnessed our farewell,
When thou didst turn thee from a heart Thine own, and passing rich as well.
I know too well my fault was great,
Yet less than that thy memory kept,
And I have borne its woeful weight,
And tears of blood my sin hath wept.
And years have passed, and now my star
Conducts me near thy paths once more,
I feel anew my bosom’s war,
The joy and pain well known of yore.
Methinks from thee I would not sever,
And I would speak the word “Forgive!” For, though the world would part us ever,
Thou’rt loved and lovely, and I live.
  If to new aims I turned away,
Through joy and sorrow struggling free,
Yet through life’s various hazard-play
My thought would still come home to thee.
I strove for pleasure, honour, truth,
Prizes I won, and wear them now; Yet boon is none so rich as youth—
The boon of youth to me wert thou.
G. C. Swayne.