OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Muller v. Dows/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
94 U.S. 277
Muller v. Dows
Stipulations between counsel relative to the course of proceeding in a cause pending in this court cannot be withdrawn by one party without the consent of the other, except by leave of the court upon cause shown. The counsel in this case stipulated in writing, on or before July 5, 1876, to submit the cause on printed arguments, under rule 20, during the first ninety days of this term. This stipulation was filed here July 5; but, Oct. 21, the counsel for the appellants notified the counsel for the appellees that he withdrew his agreement.
The counsel for the appellees having filed a printed argument within the ninety days, now asks that the cause be taken up and considered by the court as submitted under the rule.
This we might with propriety do, as, if the desired withdrawal is not assented to, application for the vacation of the stipulation ought to be made here in time to have it disposed of before the expiration of the ninety days. But as we have never before been called upon to settle the practice applicable to this class of cases, it is now ordered that the appellants cause a printed argument to be filed in their behalf on or before March 6, next, or show good cause why the stipulation for submission made by their counsel should not be enforced against them; and, in default, that the cause be taken up and considered as submitted under the rule, without argument by the appellants.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Muller v. Dows

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
94 U.S. 277
Muller v. Dows
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Iowa.
On motion of Mr. Thomas F. Withrow, for the appellees, to take up and consider the appeal as submitted under the twentieth rule.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Muller v. Oregon

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908), was a landmark decision in United States Supreme Court history, as it justifies both sex discrimination and usage of labor laws during the time period. The case upheld Oregon state restrictions on the working hours of women as justified by the special state interest in protecting women's health.
United States Supreme Court
208 U.S. 412
Muller v. Oregon
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon
No. 107 Argued: January 15, 1908 --- Decided: February 24, 1908
Messrs. William D. Fenton and Henry H. Gilfry for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 413-415 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. H. B. Adams, Louis Brandeis, John Manning, A. M. Crawford, and B. E. Haney for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 415-416 intentionally omitted]

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Muller v. Ehlers

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
91 U.S. 249
Muller v. Ehlers
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
The parties to this suit, by stipulation in writing filed with the clerk, waived a jury, and submitted to a trial by the court, which was had at the October Term, A. D. 1872, when the case was taken under advisement. At the next term, and on the 28th April, 1873, the court found generally for the plaintiff: whereupon defendants moved for a new trial. This motion was continued until the next term; when, on the 15th July, it was overruled, and judgment entered on the finding.
On the 25th July, 1873, this writ of error, returnable on the second Monday of October then next ensuing, was sued out and served, and on the same day a supersedeas bond was approved and filed. The citation was filed Aug. 4, 1873.
Down to this date, as appears by the record, a bill of exceptions had not been signed or allowed, nor time given, either by consent of the parties or by order of the court, to prepare one. In this condition of the case, the court adjourned for the term.
At the next term, on the 27th October, 1873, and after the return day of the writ of error, a bill of exceptions was signed and filed by order of the court, as of the 28th April, 1873. It nowhere appears from the record that this was done with the consent of the plaintiff, or even with his knowledge. It is for errors appearing in this bill of exceptions alone that a reversal of the judgment is asked.
Mr. Matt. H. Carpenter for the plaintiff in error, and Mr. F. W. Cotzhausen for the defendant in error.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Native Flowers of New Zealand/Plate 26

ARISTOTELIA RACEMOSA, Hook. fil.
New Zealand Ribes?
Native Name:—Mako-Mako.
This is a very beautiful shrub or small tree, which springs up on the edge of clearings and at the side of roads after the trees in the forest are felled. It is curious that it is not seen before, but as soon as light and air are let in, it covers the ground. It is found in great quantities throughout the Islands, but especially at the side of the coach roads in the South. The head of flowers of all shades from crimson to white, and the pink under the leaves give it a very handsome appearance. Flowers from October to January. Wai-wera.
| Aristotelia racemosa | Leighton Brothers Lith |
| PLATE 26 ||
# Native Flowers of New Zealand/Plate 33

QUINTINIA SERRATA.
A small Australian and New Zealand genus. The only New Zealand species are shrubs or small trees, with lepidote scales, that secrete a visced exudation. Hook. fil. Q. Serrata is a tall tree, and when I saw it on the Thames Ranges, Auckland, New Zealand, it looked very beautiful covered with long racemes of white flowers. It grows in the North and also in the Middle Island, Aorere Valley. Altitude, 1,400 ft. It flowers in December.
| Quintina serrata | Leighton Brothers Lith |
| PLATE 33 ||
# Native Flowers of New Zealand/Plate 3

Epacris microphylla, Br.
This well known Australian plant is only known in a single locality in New Zealand, on the southern shore of the Manukau Harbour, and may possibly be introduced and not a true native. It has a pretty and graceful mode of growth, harmonizing very well with the Leptospermum and Pomaderris scrub with which it is usually associated. It flowers in November.
| Epacris microphylla | Leighton Brothers Lith |
| PLATE 3 ||
# Native Flowers of New Zealand/Plate 34

PLAGIANTHUS LYALLII, Hook. fil.
Lace-Bark Tree.
Native Name:—Whau-whau.
A small tree, 15 to 25 ft. high, common in the mountain forests of the South Island, especially by the sides of streams. It has a graceful, spreading mode of growth, fine bold foliage, and exceedingly handsome large white flowers, and is altogether one of the most handsome and noteworthy trees found in the Colony. The bark is remarkably tough, and is often used by the bushman as a substitute for rope. (Cheeseman). It flowers in January. Otira Gerge.
| Plagianthus Lyallii | Leighton Brothers Lith |
| PLATE 34 ||
# Native Flowers of New Zealand/Plate 28

EARINA MUCRONATA.
A small genus, confined as at present known to New Zealand. Hook. fil. There are two species—E. Mucronata and E. Autumnalis. They are found in both the Northern and Middle Islands, growing on trees. The roots of E. Mucronata often completely encase the branch on which it grows. The whole plant can be scaled off, when it forms a lovely object to hang up in a fernery, with its numerous heads of pale yellow flowers, hanging on their slender stalks, amidst the long, narrow, grass-like leaves. It flowers in December and January. Waiwara.
| Earina mucronata | Leighton Brothers Lith |
| PLATE 28 ||
# Native Flowers of New Zealand/Plate 32

PHEBALIUM NUDUM, Hook. fil.
Native Name:—Maire-Hau.
One of the most charming little shrubs in the New Zealand Flora. It is usually from 6 to 12 ft. in height, and has a singularly neat and graceful habit of growth. The flowers are white, or white tinged with pink, and are arranged in many-flowered corymbs terminating the branches. Both foliage and flowers have a strong, but pleasant, aromatic smell, and would probably yield an essential oil valuable for perfumery purposes. It is confined to the northern portions of the Auckland Provincial District. (Cheeseman). It flowers in November. Whangarei.
| Phebalium nudum | Leighton Brothers Lith |
| PLATE 32 ||
# Native Flowers of New Zealand/Plate 30

LORANTHUS COLENSOI, Hook. fil.
Scarlet Mistletoe.
Native Name:—Pirita.
This is a most beautiful plant, growing principally in the forests near Nelson in Spring, when it blossoms. The Beech or Fagus woods are red with it; it hangs in large bunches from the trees and covers the ground with the flowers which have dropt. It also grows on Metrosideros tomentosa, near Lake Waikara (Colenso). On Lake Station and on the banks of lovely Lake Roto-iti it is very abundant. The shape of the flower is very peculiar, and differs very much from Loranthus Adamsii, which is already figured in this book. It flowers in January. Roto-iti.
| Loranthus Colensoi | Leighton Brothers Lith |
| PLATE 30 ||
# Native Flowers of New Zealand/Plate 31

GNAPHALIUM (HELICHRYSUM) GRANDICEPS.
This lovely little flower closely resembles the Swiss Edelweiss, with the difference of the brown spots on its disc. It grows on mountains in the Middle Island. Altitude, 4,000 to 6,000 ft. It flowers in January. Arthur's Pass.
GNAPHALIUM BELLIDIOIDES.
The whole plant is silvery with white wool and shining oppressed tomentum on the foliage, the bright green on the upper part of which make it very lovely. Abundant in Alpine districts in Northern and Middle Islands. Altitude, 4,000 ft. Mount Egmont. Flowers in January.
WAHLENBERGIA SAXICOLA.
A small perennial, perfectly glabrous herb, not uncommon in hilly and sub-alpine districts, ascending to nearly 6,000 ft. The Blue Bell of Otago. It flowers in January. Roto-iti, Nelson.
SENECIO GLASTIFOLIUS, Hook. fil.
Native Name:—Kakika.
A small tree, 6 to 10 ft. high, everywhere perfectly smooth. This fine plant has nothing of the habit of any other New Zealand species of Senecio, though it is one of the most beautiful. Hab. Northern Island as far south as Taranaki. It flowers in December. Waikomiti.
| Gnaphalium bellidiodies Gnaphalium grandiceps Senecio Glastifolius Wahlenbergia saxicola | Leighton Brothers Lith |
| PLATE 31 ||
# Native Flowers of New Zealand/Plate 27

CALCEOLARIA SINCLAIRII, Hook. fil.
All the species of Calceolaria are confined to South America, with the exception of two native to New Zealand—the present one and C. repens—which thus afford a good illustration of the affinity existing between the floras of the two countries. C. Sinclairii is, however, of very local distribution, being confined to the district between the East Cape and Napier. The flowers, though pretty, are very small compared with those of many of the American species. (Cheeseman). It flowers in March.
EUPHRASIA MONROI, Hook. fil.
Eyebright.
There are probably only about a score of members of this genus, which really deserve specific rank, although a large number have been described as distinct. The Eyebrights are found in temperate regions of both hemispheres, about five being represented in the flora of New Zealand, and these are distinct enough from those which occur in Arctic Europe, &c. The generic name is derived from the Greek euphraino to delight, the plants being supposed to possess the power of curing blindness. In rustic practice in Britain E. officinalis is still used as an eye medicine. (Nicholson). It flowers in January. Mount Egmont.
| Calceolaria Sinclairii and Euphrasia Monroi | Leighton Brothers Lith |
| PLATE 27 ||
# Native Flowers of New Zealand/Plate 29

METROSIDEROS TOMENTOSA.
Native Name:—Pohotukawa.
This large, beautiful tree grows in the north of the Northern Island, on the coast from Auckland to the North Cape. It may often be seen with its roots spreading in different directions against the cliff, and it is marvellous how such a large tree can retain its position during heavy gales of wind. The larger blossom of a deeper crimson and the white tomentum under the leaves, distinguish it from the other Metrosideros. It is called Christmas tree in Auckland, because it flowers at that season. It has been introduced further south, where it grows freely. The description of this tree, signed J. S. in Vol. 26, Bot. Mag., seems to apply to M. Florida and not to M. Tomentosa. G. B. H.
| Pohutuka Metrosideros tomentosa | Leighton Brothers Lith |
| PLATE 29 ||
# Montgomery Building & Construction Trades Council v. Ledbetter Erection Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
344 U.S. 178
Montgomery Building & Construction Trades Council v. Ledbetter Erection Company
Argued: Nov. 13, 1952. --- Decided: Dec 8, 1952
Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., for petitioners.
Mr. Jack Crenshaw, Montgomery, Ala., for respondent.
Mr. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B., amicus curiae by special leave of Court.
Mr. Justice MINTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Montgomery Bell v. Taylor

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
26 U.S. 351
Montgomery Bell v. Taylor
[Syllabus intentionally omitted]
THIS was a writ of error to the seventh Circuit Court of the United States, for the district of Kentucky, sued out by the plaintiff below; and the case was presented for the consideration of this Court, upon a bill of exceptions, taken by the plaintiff in error.
An action of assumpsit was instituted against Charles Wilkins, Jonathan Taylor, James Morrison, Anthony Butler, and Isaac White, in 1823. The defendants, on the first of March 1810, by articles of agreement, under their respective hands and seals, entered into a partnership, for the purpose of manufacturing and vending salt, at Saline, near the Wabash, in the then Illinois Territory, under the firm of Jonathan Taylor & Co.; and the object of this suit is the recovery of about twenty thousand dollars, claimed to be due on the sale and delivery of castings, to that value or amount. The evidence of the sale and delivery of the articles, and of their value, was complete; and the questions which were presented to the Court, by the record, were:-1st. Upon the decision of the Circuit Court, against the admission of a deposition, which had been intended to be taken in conformity with the provisions of the Act of Congress of the 24th September 1789, ch. 20, and in reference to the taking of which were was in all respects a compliance with the directions of the Act, with the exception, that the deposition was not certified to have been reduced to writing by the magistrate, or by the deponent in his presence; and,
2d. On the exclusion of certain testimony, and the validity of the plea of the statute of limitations, upon which plea the decision of the Court having been in favour of the defendants, a verdict and judgment was rendered for them.
All the facts considered as proved in the case, and also the written and documentary testimony essential to a full understanding of the case are stated at length in the opinion of the Court, delivered by Mr. Justice Story.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Montgomery v. Anderson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
62 U.S. 386
Montgomery v. Anderson
THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States, sitting in admiralty, for the district of Missouri.
The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
It was argued by Mr. Polk for the appellants, and Mr. Rankin for the appellees.
Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Montgomery Ward & Company v. Duncan

United States Supreme Court
311 U.S. 243
Montgomery Ward & Company v. Duncan
Argued: Nov. 12, 1940. --- Decided: Dec 9, 1940
Messrs. John A. Barr, of Chicago, Ill., and J. Merrick Moore, of Little Rock, Ark., for petitioner.
Mr. Edward H. Coulter, of Little Rock, Ark., for respondent.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# My God! till I received thy stroke

This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
EPHRAIM repenting by William Cowper
    My God! till I received thy stroke,
    How like a beast was I!
    So unaccustomed to the yoke,
    So backward to comply.
    With grief my just reproach I bear,
    Shame fills me at the thought;
    How frequent my rebellions were!
    What wickedness I wrought!
    Thy merciful restraint I scorned
    And left the pleasant road;
    Yet turn me, and I shall be turned,
    Thou art the Lord my God.
    Is Ephraim banished from my thoughts,
    Or vile in my esteem?
    No, saith the LORD, with all his faults,
    I shall remember him.
    Is he a dear and pleasant child?
    Yes, dear and pleasant still;
    Though sin his foolish heart beguiled,
    And he withstood my will.
    My sharp rebuke has laid him low,
    He seeks my face again;
    My pity kindles at his woe,
    He shall not seek in vain.
# My Heart Is Fixed, O God

My heart is fixed, O God, my heart Is fixed to triumph in thy grace: (Awake, my lute, and bear a part) My glory is to sing thy praise, Till all thy nature I partake, And bright in all thine image wake.
Thee will I praise among thine own; Thee will I to the world extol, And make thy truth and goodness known: Thy goodness, Lord, is over all; Thy truth and grace the heavens transcend; Thy faithful mercies never end.
Be thou exalted, Lord, above The highest name in earth or heaven; Let angels sing thy glorious love, And bless the name to sinners given; All earth and heaven their King proclaim! Bow every knee to Jesus' name!
# My Heart Leaps Up

* "'My heart leaps up when I behold' in Poems, in Two Volumes, Volume II (1807)
* "My heart leaps up" in Poems, Volume I (1815)
* As "The Rainbow" in Poems That Every Child Should Know (1904)
* "My heart leaps up when I behold" in The Hundred Best Poems (lyrical) in the English language - second series (1904), edited by Adam Luke Gowans
# My God, I Am Thine

My God, I am Thine What a Comfort divine, What a Blessing to know that my Jesus is mine!
In the Heavenly Lamb Thrice happy I am; My Heart it doth dance to the Sound of thy Name.
True Pleasures abound In the rapturous Sound; And whoever hath found it hath Paradise found.
My Jesus to know, And feel his Blood flow, 'Tis Life Everlasting, 'tis Heaven below.
Yet onward I haste To the Heavenly Feast; That, that is the Fulness: but This is the Taste.
And this I shall prove, 'Till with Joy I remove To the Heaven of Heavens of Jesus's Love.
# My God, I Know, I Feel Thee Mine

My God! I know, I feel thee mine, And will not quit my claim, Till all I have be lost in thine, And all renew'd I am.
I hold thee with a trembling hand, But will not let thee go, Till stedfastly by faith I stand, And all thy goodness know.
When shall I see the welcome hour That plants my God in me! Spirit of health, and life, and power, And perfect liberty!
Jesus, thine all-victorious love Shed in my heart abroad; Then shall my feet no longer rove Rooted and fixt in God.
Love only can the conquest win, The strength of sin subdue, (My own unconquerable sin) And form my soul anew.
Love can bow down the stubborn neck, The stone to flesh convert, Soften, and melt, and pierce, and break An adamantine heart.
O that in me the sacred fire Might now begin to glow, Burn up the dross of base desire, And make the mountains flow!
O that it now from heaven might fall, And all my sins consume! Come, Holy Ghost, for thee I call, Spirit of burning come!
Refining fire, go through my heart, Illuminate my soul, Scatter thy life through every part, And sanctify the whole.
Sorrow and self shall then expire, While entered into rest, I only live my God t' admire, My God forever blest.
No longer then my heart shall mourn, While purified by grace, I only for his glory burn, And always see his face.
My steadfast soul, from falling free, Can now no longer move; Jesus is all the world to me, And all my heart is love.