OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Reports/Volume 421

* 421 U.S. 1 (1975) Vella v. Ford Motor Company
* 421 U.S. 7 (1975) Stanton v. Stanton
* 421 U.S. 21 (1975) McLucas v. DeChamplain
* 421 U.S. 35 (1975) Withrow v. Larkin
* 421 U.S. 60 (1975) Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council
* 421 U.S. 100 (1975) Colonial Pipeline Company v. Traigle
* 421 U.S. 117 (1975) Kugler v. Helfant
* 421 U.S. 132 (1975) National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
* 421 U.S. 168 (1975) Renegotiation Board v. Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation
* 421 U.S. 193 (1975) Costarelli v. Massachusetts
* 421 U.S. 200 (1975) Gurley v. Rhoden
* 421 U.S. 213 (1975) Johnson v. Mississippi
* 421 U.S. 240 (1975) Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society
* 421 U.S. 289 (1975) Hill v. Stone
* 421 U.S. 309 (1975) United States v. Wilson (421 U.S. 309)
* 421 U.S. 330 (1975) Phelps v. United States (421 U.S. 330)
* 421 U.S. 338 (1975) Van Lare v. Hurley Taylor
* 421 U.S. 349 (1975) Meek v. Pittenger
* 421 U.S. 397 (1975) United States v. Reliable Transfer Company, Inc.
* 421 U.S. 426 (1975) Ellis v. Dyson
* 421 U.S. 454 (1975) Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.
* 421 U.S. 477 (1975) Dallas County Alabama v. Reese
* 421 U.S. 482 (1975) Pitchess v. Davis
* 421 U.S. 491 (1975) Eastland v. United States Servicemen's Fund
* 421 U.S. 519 (1975) Breed v. Jones
* 421 U.S. 542 (1975) Fry v. United States
* 421 U.S. 560 (1975) Dunlop v. Bachowski
* 421 U.S. 599 (1975) United States v. State Tax Commission of Mississippi
* 421 U.S. 616 (1975) Connell Construction Company, Inc. v. Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union No. 100
* 421 U.S. 656 (1975) Connor v. Waller
* 421 U.S. 658 (1975) United States v. Park
* 421 U.S. 684 (1975) Mullaney v. Wilbur
* 421 U.S. 707 (1975) Philbrook v. Glodgett
* 421 U.S. 723 (1975) Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores
* 421 U.S. 772 (1975) Edwards v. Healy
* 421 U.S. 773 (1975) Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar
* 421 U.S. 794 (1975) Murphy v. Florida
* 421 U.S. 809 (1975) Bigelow v. Virginia
* 421 U.S. 837 (1975) United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. Forman
* 421 U.S. 923 (1975) Art Theater Guild, Inc. v. Ewing
* 421 U.S. 925 (1975) S.S. & W., Inc. v. City of Kansas City, Missouri
* 421 U.S. 934 (1975) Demarrias v. Poitra
* 421 U.S. 937 (1975) Alligator Company, Inc. v. La Chemise Lacoste
* 421 U.S. 940 (1975) Marks v. Leis
* 421 U.S. 952 (1975) Dyke v. Georgia
* 421 U.S. 954 (1975) Dachsteiner v. United States
* 421 U.S. 993 (1975) Ridens v. Illinois
* 421 U.S. 1004 (1975) Friedman v. United States (421 U.S. 1004)
# United States Reports/Volume 427

* 427 U.S. 1 (1976) Aldinger v. Howard
* 427 U.S. 38 (1976) United States v. Santana
* 427 U.S. 50 (1976) Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.
* 427 U.S. 97 (1976) United States v. Agurs
* 427 U.S. 123 (1976) United States v. Hopkins
* 427 U.S. 132 (1976) Lodge 76, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
* 427 U.S. 160 (1976) Runyon v. McCrary
* 427 U.S. 215 (1976) Meachum v. Fano
* 427 U.S. 236 (1976) Montanye v. Haymes
* 427 U.S. 246 (1976) Union Electric Company v. Environmental Protection Agency
* 427 U.S. 273 (1976) McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Company
* 427 U.S. 297 (1976) City of New Orleans v. Dukes
* 427 U.S. 307 (1976) Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia
* 427 U.S. 328 (1976) North v. Russell
* 427 U.S. 347 (1976) Elrod v. Burns
* 427 U.S. 390 (1976) Kleppe v. Sierra Club
* 427 U.S. 424 (1976) Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler
* 427 U.S. 445 (1976) Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer
* 427 U.S. 461 (1976) Utah v. United States (427 U.S. 461)
* 427 U.S. 463 (1976) Andresen v. Maryland
* 427 U.S. 495 (1976) Mathews v. Lucas
* 427 U.S. 524 (1976) Norton v. Mathews
* 427 U.S. 539 (1976) Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart
* 427 U.S. 618 (1976) Ludwig v. Massachusetts
* 427 U.S. 639 (1976) National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/4th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 49

Chap. ⅩⅬⅨ.—An Act limiting the time for the allowance of Drawback on the Exportation of Domestic distilled Spirits, and allowing a Drawback upon such Spirits exported in vessels of less than thirty tons, by the Mississippi.
Drawbacks in what cases allowed.Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the first day of July next, no drawback shall be allowed on any of the spirits distilled in the United States, which shall not be exported, pursuant to regulations heretofore enacted, and in force, within twelve months from the time when such spirits were distilled, to be ascertained by the dates of the certificates which may and ought to accompany the said spirits, at the time of exportation.
56 section of certain act suspended with regard to the Ohio and Mississippi. 1791, ch. 15. Repealed 1802, ch. 19.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the restriction in the fifty-sixth section of the act, intituled “An act, repealing after the last day of June next, the duties heretofore laid upon distilled spirits imported from abroad, and laying others in their stead; and also, upon spirits distilled in the United States, and for appropriating the same,” shall, from and after the first day of July next, be suspended, and cease to operate for the space of one year, so far as the said restriction respects any distilled spirits which may be exported from the district of Louisville, in the state of Kentucky, or from any district which may be hereafter established on the rivers Mississippi or Ohio, or the branches thereof.
Approved, June 1, 1796.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/4th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 45

Chap. ⅩⅬⅤ.—An Act providing Passports for the ships and vessels of the United States.
Act of March 22, 1803, ch. 16. Passport formed by Secretary of State to be approved by the President.Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That it shall be the duty of the Secretary of State, to prepare a form, which, when approved by the President, shall be deemed the form of a passport for ships and vessels of the United States.
Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That every ship and vessel of the United States, going to any foreign country, shall, before she departs from the United States, at the request of the master, be furnished by ​Vessels to be furnished therewith.the collector for the district, where such ship or vessel may be, with a passport of the form prescribed and established, pursuant to the foregoing section; for which passport, the master of such ship or vessel, shall pay to the said collector, ten dollars, to be accounted for by him; and in order to be entitled to such passport, the master of every such ship or vessel shall be bound with sufficient sureties, to the Treasurer of the United States, in the penalty of two thousand dollars, conditioned, that the said passport shall not be applied to the use or protection of any other ship or vessel, than the one described in the same; On sale or loss of the ship, passport to be delivered up.and that, in case of the loss or sale of any ship or vessel having such passport, the same shall, within three months, be delivered up to the collector from whom it was received, if the loss or sale take place within the United States; or within six months, if the same shall happen at any place nearer than the Cape of Good Hope; and within eighteen months, if at a more distant place.
Vessels to pay collectors certain sums every voyage.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That there shall be paid on every ship and vessel of the United States sailing or trading to any foreign country, other than some port or place in America, for each and every voyage, the sum of four dollars, to be received and accounted for, by the collector, at the time of clearing outward, if such vessel be bound direct to such foreign country, from any port of the United States, or at the time of entry in the United States, if such ship or vessel shall have sailed to such foreign country, from any port or place in America, other than of the United States.
Penalty on sailing without passport after first September.Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That if any ship or vessel of the United States, shall depart therefrom, after the first day of September next, and shall be bound to any foreign country, other than to some port or place in America, without such passport, the master of such ship or vessel shall forfeit and pay the sum of two hundred dollars for every such offence.
Approved, June 1, 1796.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/4th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 48

Chap. ⅩⅬⅧ.—An Act making an appropriation to satisfy certain Demands attending the late Insurrection; and to increase the compensation to Jurors and Witnesses in the Courts of the United States.
Appropriation for defraying expenses on trial of persons concerned in the late insurrection.Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That a sum, not exceeding twenty thousand dollars, out of any monies not otherwise appropriated, be, and the same is hereby appropriated to the discharge of certain incidental demands, occasioned by the trial of persons for crimes and offences during the late insurrection, for the payment of which no special provision has been made by law.
Additional compensation to jurors, &c. 1792, ch. 36.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That in addition to the compensation now allowed by law to jurors and witnesses, attending in the courts of the United States, there shall be allowed and paid to each grand and petit juror, for his attendance, fifty cents per day; and to each witness, for like attendance, fifty cents per day.
Appropriation for clerks of courts and jurors.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That the sum of ten thousand dollars, out of any monies not otherwise appropriated, be, and the same is hereby appropriated, for defraying the expense of clerks of courts, jurors and witnesses, for the year one thousand seven hundred and ninety-six, in aid of the fund arising from fines, forfeitures and penalties, and of the appropriations already made for that purpose.
Approved, June 1, 1796.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/4th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 5

Chap. Ⅴ.—An Act providing relief, for a limited lime, in certain cases of invalid Registers.
Secretary of Treasury to allow certain privileges in cases of invalid registers on certain conditions. Ante, p. 287.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of the Treasury be, and he is hereby empowered, to allow to such vessels and their cargoes, whose registers have already, or that may, before the close of the present session of Congress, become invalid, by reason of a noncompliance with the terms of the fifth section of the act “concerning the registering and recording of ships or vessels,” the same privileges and benefits, they would have been entitled to, if no such invalidity had taken place: Provided, it shall appear to him, that such non-compliance did not proceed from wilful negligence or an intention of fraud: And provided also, that a new register shall be obtained, in the manner ​prescribed by law, for such vessels respectively, as may now be within the United States, within ninety days from the passing of this act; and for others, within the same time after their first arrival within the United States.
Approved, March 10, 1796.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/4th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 40

Chap. ⅩⅬ.—An Act to regulate the Compensation of Clerks.
Heads of Departments to vary compensations to clerks.Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of the department of State, and the Secretary of the department of War, be authorized to vary for the present year the compensations heretofore established for clerks in their respective departments, in such manner as the services to be performed shall in their judgment require.
Addition to the appropriations of 1794.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That to the aggregate of compensations for clerks, in the year one thousand seven hundred and ninety-four, there shall, during the present year, be farther allowed,
In the Treasury Department, the sum of four thousand dollars, including one thousand eight hundred dollars to three additional clerks.
In the Department of State, the sum of two hundred dollars.
In the Department of War, the sum of two hundred dollars. And that the accountant of the war department may employ a principal clerk at the salary allowed to principal clerks in the other departments.
And to the Director of the Mint, for one clerk to be employed by him the additional sum of two hundred dollars.
Allowance to certain commissioners of loans.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That there be allowed for the present year to the commissioners of loans in the states of Massachusetts and New York, respectively, not exceeding five clerks, at the rate of five hundred dollars each; to the commissioner of loans in the state of Connecticut, not exceeding two clerks, at the rate of four hundred dollars each; and to the commissioners of loans in the states of Pennsylvania, Virginia and South Carolina, respectively, not exceeding two clerks, at the rate of five hundred dollars each. The aggregate of the compensations for the clerks employed by either of the said ​commissioners to be apportioned among them at his discretion. That there be allowed for the year aforesaid, in lieu of clerk hire to the commissioner of loans in the state of New Hampshire, three hundred and fifty dollars; to the commissioner of loans, in the state of Rhode Island, four hundred dollars; to the commissioner of loans, in the state of New Jersey,See p. 730, post. three hundred dollars; and to the commissioner of loans, in the state of Maryland, two hundred and fifty dollars.
Approved, May 30, 1796.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/4th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 43

Chap. ⅩⅬⅢ.—An Act to continue in force, for a limited time, the acts therein mentioned.
Acts for support of lighthouses and for mitigating and remitting forfeitures continued for two years. Ante, p. 339. Ante, p. 122.Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the act, entitled “An act supplementary to the act for the establishment and support of lighthouses, beacons, buoys and public piers,” so far as the same provides for defraying the necessary expense of supporting lighthouses, beacons, buoys, and public piers, and the stakeage of channels on the sea coast. And also, the act, entitled “An act to provide for mitigating or remitting the forfeitures and penalties accruing under the revenue laws in certain cases therein mentioned,” be, and the same are hereby continued in force for the term of two years.
Also 13th section of act for collecting duties on foreign and domestic distilled spirits, &c. for one year. Ante, p. 378. Ante, p. 390.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the thirteenth section of the act, intituled “An act making further provision for securing and collecting the duties on foreign and domestic distilled spirits, stills, wines and teas,” which section will expire at the end of the present session of Congress, shall be, and the same is hereby further continued in force, for the term of one year from the passing of this act, and from thence to the end of the next session of Congress thereafter, and no longer.
Approved, May 30, l796.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/4th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 47

Chap. ⅩⅬⅦ.—An Act for the admission of the State of Tennessee into the Union.
Ante, p. 106.Whereas by the acceptance of the deed of cession of the state of North Carolina, Congress are bound to lay out into one or more states, the territory thereby ceded to the United States:
Certain territory declared to be one state under the name of Tennessee.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the whole of the territory ceded to the United States by the state of North Carolina, shall be one state, and the same is hereby declared to be one of the United States of America, on an equal footing with the original states, in all respects ​whatever, by the name and title of the State of Tennessee. That until the next general census, the said state of Tennessee shall be entitled to one Representative in the House of Representatives of the United States; and in all other respects, as far as they may be applicable, the laws of the United States shall extend to,1802, ch. 1. and have force in the state of Tennessee, in the same manner, as if that state had originally been one of the United States.
Approved, June 1, 1796.
# United States v. Axman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
234 U.S. 36
United States v. Axman
Argued: March 9, 1914. --- Decided: May 25, 1914
Solicitor General Davis for the United States.
Death of Rudolph Axman, one of the defendents in error herein, suggested, and appearance of Julia A. Axman filed and entered March 9, 1914, as a party defendant in error herein.
Messrs. Frank W. Aitken and John R. Aitken for Julia Axman.
[Argument of Counsel from page 37 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Edward Duffy and Jesse W. Lilienthal for the American Bonding Company.
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Averill

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
130 U.S. 335
United States v. Averill
Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for appellant.
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Avery

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
80 U.S. 251
United States v. Avery

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Ayres

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
76 U.S. 608
United States v. Ayres
THIS case was an appeal from the Court of Claims, and the matter here reported presents the case of two motions, made at two different times, for the defendant in error to dismiss it; made the first time under one state of facts, and the second time under another and new state; and also a motion on the other side, under the new state of facts, for a special action by this court hereinafter stated. The case in its whole history was thus:
One Ayres brought suit against the United States in the Court of Claims, and obtained a judgment for the amount claimed by him. An appeal was taken by the government and was now pending here. While the appeal was thus pending, the counsel for the United States made a motion in that court for a new trial. This motion for the new trial was made under an act of June 25th, 1868, in these words:
'That said Court of Claims, at any time, while any suit or claim is pending before or on appeal from said court, or within two years next after the final disposition of any such suit or claim, may, on motion, on behalf of the United States, grant a new trial on any such suit or claim, and stay the payment of any judgment therein, upon such evidence (although the same may be cumulative or other) as shall reasonably satisfy said court that any fraud, wrong, or injustice in the premises has been done to the United States. But until an order is made staying the payment of the judgment, the same shall be payable, and paid as now provided by law.'
While the motion for a new trial was thus pending in the court below, and before any action upon it by that court, Mr. Hughes, in this court, for the defendant in error, Ayres, moved to dismiss the appeal, insisting on the part of the claimant that the two proceedings, the one of appeal, and the other of motion for a new trial, were inconsistent, and not in accordance with a reasonable interpretation of the act; that the counsel of the United States was bound to elect which of the two remedies he would adopt, and having, in this instance, elected the motion for a new trial, the appeal should be dismissed.
Mr. J. S. Hale, special counsel for the United States, opposed the motion, contending that the act allowed both proceedings at the same time.
And now, in this condition of the case,
Mr. Justice NELSON delivered the first opinion of the court in the matter.

## Notes

* 15 Stat. at Large, 75, § 2.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Babbit

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
66 U.S. 55
United States v. Babbit
Writ of error to the District Court of the United States for the district of Iowa.
The United States brought debt against Lysander W. Babbit and his sureties on his official bond as register of the land office at Kanesville, Iowa. Babbit was commissioned on the 6th of April, 1853, and held his office until the 20th of October, 1856, to which time his accounts were adjusted by the accounting officers of the treasury, showing a balance against him of $9,816 24. This amount consisted of fees received by him for locating military bounty land warrants under the acts of February 11, 1847, September 25, 1850, March 22, 1852, and March 3, 1855. The accounts credited him with commissions to the full amount of $3,000, and the balance of the fees received by him being in excess of the maximum allowed by law, the United States brought this suit to recover them. The defence was, that the fees rightfully belonged to the officer himself, and he was not bound to account for them to the United States. The question of law raised in the cause was, whether a register of the land office who has received fees for locating military bounty lands can retain them, whatever may be their amount, or whether he is bound to account for them, and pay over to the treasury all he receives beyond three thousand dollars of such fees, as of others. The District Court decided the point in favor of the defendants, and the United States brought the case into the Supreme Court on writ of error.
The Attorney General (Mr. Bates) for the United States.
Mr. Reverdy Johnson, of Maryland, and r. Gillet, of Washington city, for defendant.
Mr. Justice SWAYNE.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse