OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Strassheim v. Daily

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
221 U.S. 280
Strassheim v. Daily
Argued: April 3 and 4, 1911. --- Decided: May 15, 1911
Messrs. Thomas E. Barkworth. Ferdinand L. Barnett, Charles W. McGill, and Franz C. Kuhn for appellant.
Mr. William S. Forrest for appellee.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Strange fits of passion I have known

* "Strange fits of passion I have known" in Lyrical Ballads Volume II (1800)
* "Strange fits of passion" in Poems Volume I (1815)
# Strange stories from a Chinese studio

STRANGE STORIES
FROM A
CHINESE STUDIO
TRANSLATED AND ANNOTATED
BY
HERBERT A. GILES
HON. M.A. (CANTAB.),
HON. LL.D. (ABERD.), PROFESSOR OF CHINESE IN THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE AND SOME
TIME H.B.M. CONSUL AT NINGPO
THIRD EDITION REVISED
KELLY & WALSH, LIMITED
SHANGHAI, HONGKONG, SINGAPORE
AND YOKOHAMA
1916
TO MY GRANDCHILDREN
PENELOPE ESBELL LAURENCE
MARGARET VALÉRIE ST. GILES
SYLVIA SARAH GILES
ROSAMOND ST. GILES
AUSTIN LOUDON VALENTINE ST. GILES
JOHN ALLEN LAURENCE
AUDREY LAURENCE
CONTENTS
STORIES
# Strange stories from a Chinese studio/The She-wolf and the Herd-boys

CLIV. THE SHE-WOLF AND THE HERD-BOYS
Two herd-boys went up among the hills and found a wolf's lair with two little wolves in it. Seizing each of them one, they forthwith climbed two trees which stood there, at a distance of forty or fifty paces apart. Before long the old wolf came back, and, finding her cubs gone, was in a great state of distress. Just then, one of the herd-boys pinched his cub and made it squeak; whereupon the mother ran angrily towards the tree whence the sound proceeded, and tried to climb up it. At this juncture, the boy in the other tree pinched the other cub, and thereby diverted the wolf's attention in that direction. But no sooner had she reached the foot of the second tree, than the boy who had first pinched his cub did so again, and away ran the old wolf back to the tree in which her other young one was. Thus they went on time after time, until the mother was dead tired, and lay down exhausted on the ground. Then, when after some time she showed no signs of moving, the herd-boys crept stealthily down, and found that the wolf was already stiff and cold. And truly, it is better to meet a blustering foe with his hand upon his sword-hilt, by retiring within doors, and leaving him to fret his violence away unopposed; for such is but the behaviour of brute beasts, of which men thus take advantage.
# The Acts and Monuments of John Foxe/Volume 3/Supplication of the Barons to the Emperor Sigismund for John Huss

Layout 2
Supplication of the Barons to the Emperor Sigismund for John Huss.
Unto the most high and mighty prince, the lord Sigismund, king of the Romans, always Augustus, king of Hungary, Croatia and Dalmatia, our most gracious lord, faithful and true service in all things, and at all times. Most noble prince, and gracious lord, we signify unto your worthiness, that we all together, with one mind, consent, and accord, have delivered up unto the reverend fathers and lords, the deputies of the four nations, and to the whole sacred council of Constance, this our supplication hereunder written, as reasonable, just, and worthy of consideration; the tenor whereof here followeth word by word, and is this.
The king forced by the importunity of the cardinals to break promise.But what answer the emperor made hereunto, we could never understand or know; but by the process of the matter a man may easily judge, that this good emperor was brought and led even unto this point, through the obstinate mischief of the cardinals and bishops, to break and falsify his promise and faith which he had made and promised: and this was their reason whereby he was driven thereunto, that no defence could or might be given either by safe-conduct, or by any other means unto him, who was suspected or judged to be a ​heretic. But by the epistles and letters of John Huss, a man may easily judge what the king's mind was. Now we will proceed in the history.
# Southern Railway Company v. Railroad Commission of Indiana

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
236 U.S. 439
Southern Railway Company v. Railroad Commission of Indiana
Argued: December 9, 1914. --- Decided: February 23, 1915
Messrs. John D. Welman, Alexander P. Humphrey, and Edward P. Humphrey for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Frank H. Hatifield, John R. Brill, John W. Brady, and T. P. Littlepage for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 440-444 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Lamar delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Southern Railway Company v. United States (222 U.S. 20)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
222 U.S. 20
Southern Railway Company v. United States
Argued: and submitted March 9 and 10, 1911. --- Decided: October 30, 1911
Mr. Alfred P. Thom for plaintiff in error.
Assistant Attorney General Fowler and Mr. Henry E. Colton for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 21-23 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Van Devanter delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Southern Railway Company v. Tift

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
206 U.S. 428
Southern Railway Company v. Tift
Argued: April 22, 23, 1907. --- Decided: May 27, 1907
Mr. Ed. Baxter for appellants.
Messrs. William A. Wimbish, William Hepburn Russell, W. D. Ellis, and Ellis, Wimbish, & Ellis for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 428-433 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Southern Railway Company v. St. Louis Hay & Grain Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
214 U.S. 297
Southern Railway Company v. St. Louis Hay & Grain Company
Argued: March 8, 9, 1909. --- Decided: June 1, 1909
This was an action brought by the defendant in error on an award of the Interstate Commerce Commission. In a general way, the facts are as follows: The St. Louis Hay & Grain Company is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Illinois, with its principal office at St. Louis, Missouri, a dealer in hay, in the course of which business it operates two warehouses in East St. Louis, Illinois. The railway company is the owner and operating a line of railway extending from East St. Louis through the eastern district of Illinois to points in Southern states, to which the hay an grain company is engaged in shipping hay. The company buys some hay at its warehouses, brought in from the adjacent country, but a large portion of it is bought at points to the north and west. Some of the hay thus purchased is sent directly through East St. Louis in the cars in which it was originally loaded, but much of it is taken to its warehouses, there unloaded, inspected, and reloaded for the Southern markets. This is called a reconsignment. Taking these cars which are to be reconsigned to the hay and grain company's warehouses, and taking the reloaded cars therefrom, involves the use of the cars for a longer time, and there is some expense in hauling the cars. For this the railway company had been in the habit of charging $4 or $5 a car, equivalent on the average loading to 2 cents per hundred pounds. On an application by the company to the Interstate Commerce Commission it was held, on May 15, 1905 (11 Inters. Com. Rep. 90), that such charge was an excessive and unreasonable charge, and that one half thereof was sufficient. Upon that basis it awarded to the hay and grain company the sum of $1,572.08, one half the sum paid theretofore by it to the railway company. This sum not being paid, the hay and grain company, on January 23, 1906, filed its petition in the United States circuit court for the eastern district of Illinois to recover the amount thus awarded, with interest, and also for an attorney's fee. A trial resulted on June 25, 1906, in a judgment in favor of the hay and grain company for the amount awarded by the Commission, with interest thereon, and also for $350 as an attorney's fee. 149 Fed. 609. On error to the United States circuit court of appeals for the seventh circuit the judgment of the circuit court was, on April 16, 1907, affirmed (82 C. C. A. 614, 153 Fed. 728), whereupon the case was brought here on error.
Messrs. Claudian B. Northrop and Edward C. Kramer for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. P. J. Farrell and L. O. Whitnel for defendant in error.
Statement by Mr. Justice Brewer:
Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Southern Railway Company v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Southern Railway Company v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Southern Railway Company v. United States (222 U.S. 20)
* Southern Railway Company v. United States (322 U.S. 72)
* Southern Railway Company v. United States (355 U.S. 283)
* Southern Railway Company v. United States (355 U.S. 370)
# Strictly Business

Layout 2
STRICTLY BUSINESS
“Major (by misplaced courtesy) Wentworth Caswell.”
STRICTLY BUSINESS
MORE STORIES OF THE FOUR MILLION
BY
O. HENRY
Author of “The Four Million,” “The Voice of the City,” “The Trimmed Lamp,” “Sixes and Sevens,” “Whirligigs,” Etc.
PUBLISHED BY DOUBLEDAY, PAGE & COMPANY FOR REVIEW OF REVIEWS CO.
COPYRIGHT, 1910, BY DOUBLEDAY, PAGE & COMPANY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, INCLUDING THAT OF TRANSLATION INTO FOREIGN LANGUAGES, INCLUDING THE SCANDINAVIAN
PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CONTENTS
STRICTLY BUSINESS
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Strickland’s Lessee v. Poole

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
September Term, 1765.
Present William Allen, Chief Justice, :
| William Coleman, | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ Justices. |
| Alexander Stedman. | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ Justices. |
The Lessee of Strickland, versus Rebecca Poole.
To prove Pedigree, evidence permitted to be given of Hearsay a great while ago, before any Dispute stirred.
# Strickley v. Highland Boy Gold Mining Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
200 U.S. 527
Strickley v. Highland Boy Gold Mining Company
Argued: and submitted January 25, 1906. --- Decided: February 19, 1906
Messrs. Arthur Brown and Frank Hoffman for plaintiffs in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 527-528 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. George Sutherland, Waldemar Van Cott, and E. M. Allison, Jr., for defendant in error.
in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 528-529 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Strengthening Fishing Communities and Increasing Flexibility in Fisheries Management Act (H.R. 59; 117th Congress)

117th congress (2021-2022)
117th CONGRESS 1st Session
H.R. 59
To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to provide flexibility for fishery managers and stability for fishermen, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 4, 2021
Mr. Young introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources
A BILL
To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to provide flexibility for fishery managers and stability for fishermen, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

### SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Strengthening Fishing Communities and Increasing Flexibility in Fisheries Management Act”.

### SEC. 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS.

The table of contents for this Act is as follows:
    Sec. 3. Definitions.
    Sec. 4. References.
       TITLE I—MAGNUSON-STEVENS ACT FINDINGS AND DEFINITIONS AMENDMENTS AND REAUTHORIZATION
       TITLE II—FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FLEXIBILITY AND MODERNIZATION
       HEALTHY FISHERIES THROUGH BETTER SCIENCE
       TITLE IV—STRENGTHENING FISHING COMMUNITIES
       TITLE V—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
       TITLE VI—REEF ASSASSIN ACT
# Standard Oil Company v. Van Etten

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
107 U.S. 325
Standard Oil Company v. Van Etten
D. M. Dickinson and L. T. Griffin, for plaintiff in error.
W. H. Smith, Harrison Greer, and M. E. Crofoot, for defendant in error.
MATTHEWS, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Standard Oil Company v. P McLaughlin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
292 U.S. 631
Standard Oil Company v. P McLaughlin
Messrs. F. D. Madison and Alfred Sutro, both of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Standard Oil Company v. Peck

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Minton
United States Supreme Court
342 U.S. 382
Standard Oil Company v. Peck
Argued: Jan. 3, 4, 1952. --- Decided: Feb 4, 1952
Messrs. Isador Grossman, Rufus S. Day, Jr., Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.
Mr. Isadore Topper, Columbus, Ohio, for appellees.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Standard Oil Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
283 U.S. 163
Standard Oil Company v. United States
Argued: April 13, 1931. ---
[Syllabus from pages 163-165 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. C. B. Ames, of Oklahoma City, Okl., Charles Neave, of New York City, and Louis L. Stephens, of Chicago, Ill, for primary appellants.
Mr. G. H. Dorr, of New York City, for secondary appellants.
The Attorney General and Mr. Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Standard Oil Company v. P McLaughlin/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
292 U.S. 631
Standard Oil Company v. P McLaughlin
The Attorney General, for Collector of Internal Revenue.
For opinion below, see 67 F.(2d) 111.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# The American Cyclopædia (1879)/Pittsburgh Landing, Battle of

Edition of 1879. See also the disclaimer.
PITTSBURGH LANDING, Battle of. See Shiloh.
# The American Cyclopædia (1879)/Pittsylvania

Edition of 1879. See also Pittsylvania County, Virginia on Wikipedia; and the disclaimer.
PITTSYLVANIA, a S. county of Virginia, bordering on North Carolina, bounded N. by the Staunton, intersected by the Banister through the middle, and drained by the Dan river on the south; area, about 900 sq. m.; pop. in 1870, 31,343, of whom 16,084 were colored. It has a diversified surface and fertile soil. The Richmond, Danville, and Piedmont railroad passes through it. The chief productions in 1870 were 125,359 bushels of wheat, 307,657 of Indian corn, 252,787 of oats, 20,332 of Irish and 9,145 of sweet potatoes, and 4,282,511 lbs. of tobacco. There were 2,926 horses, 1,310 mules and asses, 5,031 milch cows, 1,175 working oxen, 6,584 other cattle, 5,664 sheep, and 21,197 swine. Capital, Pittsylvania Court House.
# The American Cyclopædia (1879)/Pittston

Edition of 1879. See also Pittston, Pennsylvania on Wikipedia; and the disclaimer.
PITTSTON, a borough of Luzerne co., Pennsylvania, on the E. bank of the Susquehanna, just below the mouth of the Lackawanna, and on the Lackawanna and Bloomsburg, the Lehigh and Susquehanna, and the Lehigh Valley railroads, 7 m. N. E. of Wilkesbarre, 10 m. S. W. of Scranton, and 105 N. by W. of Philadelphia; pop. in 1870, 6,760; in 1875, about 15,000, including West Pittston and immediate vicinity. It is in the heart of the Wyoming anthracite region, and is the seat of the Pennsylvania coal company's operations, the shipments amounting to from 2,500,000 to 3,000,000 tons a year. It has an important trade, and the abundance and cheapness of coal give it admirable facilities for manufactures. The
principal establishments are a knitting mill, a foundery and machine shop, two planing mills, pottery and terra cotta works, water works, gas works, and extensive stove works. The borough is connected with West Pittston, on the opposite bank, by two fine bridges, and has a street railroad, an opera house, three banks with an aggregate capital of $900,000, good schools, two weekly newspapers, a public library, and 12 churches, embracing nearly all denominations.
# The American Cyclopædia (1879)/Pixis, Theodor Ludwig August

Edition of 1879. See also Theodor Pixis on Wikipedia; and the disclaimer.
PIXIS, Theodor Ludwig August, a German painter, born in Kaiserslautern, July 1, 1831. He studied in Munich, and exhibited in 1855 “Coriolanus and his Mother” and “Frederick II. of Hohenstaufen and Peter de Vineis,” and in 1856 “Huss taking leave of his Friends at Constance.” Subsequently he spent several years in Italy, and from 1858 to 1863 he executed frescoes illustrative of the history of Charles X. and XI. of Sweden, for the Bavarian national museum. The most celebrated of his later cartoons illustrate early and modern German poetry. He has also produced a fine picture of Calvin's last conversation with Servetus in his prison at Geneva.
# The American Cyclopædia (1879)/Pocahontas (county)

Edition of 1879. See also Pocahontas County, West Virginia and Pocahontas County, Iowa on Wikipedia; and the disclaimer.
POCAHONTAS. I. An E. county of West Virginia, intersected by Greenbrier river; area, 710 sq. m.; pop. in 1870, 4,069, of whom 259 were colored. It has an elevated and mountainous surface, being traversed by the Greenbrier range toward the west, and bounded S. E. by a main range of the Alleghanies, which separates it from Virginia. A large portion of the land is infertile. The chief productions
in 1870 were 14,901 bushels of wheat, 6,334 of rye, 46,512 of Indian corn, 22,343 of oats 65,740 lbs. of butter, 24,137 of wool, and 4,797 tons of hay. There were 1,815 horses, 2,440 milch cows, 5,742 other cattle, 10,824 sheep, and 2,789 swine. Capital, Huntersville. II. A N. W. county of Iowa, drained by Lizard and other small rivers; area, 625 sq. m.; pop. in 1870, 1,446. Its surface is rolling, and the soil fertile. It is traversed in the S. part by the Iowa division of the Illinois Central railroad. The chief productions in 1870 were 18,413 bushels of wheat, 32,860 of Indian corn, 11,015 of oats, 39,265 lbs. of butter, and 4,864 tons of hay. There were 374 horses, 596 milch cows, 1,280 other cattle, and 803 swine. Capital, Rolfe.
# The American Cyclopædia (1879)/Piura

Edition of 1879. See also Piura on Wikipedia; and the disclaimer.
PIURA, an inland city of Peru, capital of the department, province, and district, and on the river of the same name, 523 m. N. W. of Lima; pop. about 15,000. Situated in the midst of a sandy plain, it has pretty good streets, and houses more remarkable for solid construction than architectural symmetry. The climate is very mild and exceedingly dry, Piura being comprised within the rainless zone of the republic. Sulphur, iron, lead, magnesia, lime, and sulphate of soda abound in the province, and petroleum likewise occurs. The cultivated products comprise maize, tobacco, cacao, cotton, and the sugar cane; plantations of the two last of which are fast multiplying in the vicinity of the city, which will be connected by a railway 63 m. in length, to be completed in 1876, with its port, Payta, on the Pacific. The mules of Piura are the best in the republic.—This city, founded by Pizarro in 1531 near its present site, under the name of San Miguel, is the oldest European settlement in Peru.
# The American Cyclopædia (1879)/Pittsfield

Edition of 1879. See also Pittsfield, Massachusetts on Wikipedia; and the disclaimer.
PITTSFIELD, the shire town of Berkshire co., Massachusetts, on the Boston and Albany railroad, and at the terminus of the Housatonic and the Pittsfield and North Adams railroads, 130 m. N. N. E. of New York, and 151 m. by rail W. of Boston; pop. in 1860, 8,045; in 1870, 11,112. It is beautifully situated in an elevated valley surrounded by mountains, and is regularly laid out, with houses generally of wood and very neatly built. In the centre of the town is a green, called the park, in which is a handsome monument in memory of the citizens of Pittsfield who fell in the civil war. Around the park are several fine buildings, including the elegant white marble court house, the Congregational church of stone, the building of the Berkshire life insurance company, St. Stephen's Episcopal church, and the building of the Berkshire Athenæum, containing a fine library and collections of local curiosities. On the main street are the handsome marble church of St. Joseph (Roman Catholic) and the fine buildings and grounds of the Maplewood institute for young ladies. The jail is also a fine building. The town is extensively engaged in the manufacture of cotton and woollen goods, paper, silk, machinery, &c. It contains two national banks, with a joint capital of $700,000; a savings bank, with about $2,000,000 deposits; a high school and public schools of inferior grades, with an average attendance of about 2,000 pupils; two weekly newspapers; and nine churches.—Pittsfield was incorporated in 1761, and named in honor of William Pitt. It is soon to be organized as a city (1875). The Berkshire medical institution, founded here in 1822, was discontinued in 1869.