OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Hull Daily Mail/1926/Well known journalist. Death of Mr Lovat Fraser

Source: Hull Daily Mail, Tuesday, April 20, 1926; pg. 5; Issue 12648
Layout 2
Well known journalist. Death of Mr Lovat Fraser.
LONDON, Tuesday—The Press Association says that Mr Lovat Fraser, the well-known journalist, died at Slough this afternoon.
Deceased, who was for a number of years editor of the "Times of India," afterwards travelled round the work on various special missions for the "Times" of London. His articles, which regularly appeared in the Sunday Press and other publications, were very widely read and commented upon.
He was born in 1871.
Mr Fraser had been ill for about 12 months.
Some of Mr Fraser's early journalistic work attracted the favourable notice of Mr P. A. Graham, of "Country Life" (whose death occurred recently), and later, Mr Fraser joined the "Cheltenham Echo." He next became attached to the "Somerset County Herald" at Taunton, then joined the "Western Daily Press" at Bristol, and from there took the step which more than any other influenced his later career. He went to Bombay, where he became assistant editor, and subsequently editor, or the "Times of India." He became an acknowledged expert on Indian and Imperial politics.
This work was published in 1926 and is anonymous or pseudonymous due to unknown authorship. It is in the public domain in the United States as well as countries and areas where the copyright terms of anonymous or pseudonymous works are 97 years or less since publication.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hull Daily Mail/1933/Dr Norman Penny …

Source: Hull Daily Mail Monday, October 09, 1933, p. 9
Layout 2 Dr Norman Penny, for many years librarian of the Society of Friends, has died at Bournemouth, aged 75. He was born at Darlington, and for many years worked for the Friends Home Mission Committee in Wensleydale, Gloucester and Melksham. In 1900 he became librarian of the society, and organised and built up the reference library, which is one of the most comprehensive possessed by any religious body.
This work is anonymous or pseudonymous, and is in the public domain in the United States because it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days), and it was first published before 1989 without complying with U.S. copyright formalities (renewal and/or copyright notice) and it was in the public domain in its home country on the URAA date (January 1, 1996 for most countries). It is also in the public domain in other countries and areas where the copyright terms of anonymous or pseudonymous works are 90 years or less since publication.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hull v. Burr

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
234 U.S. 712
Hull v. Burr
Argued: March 3, 1914. --- Decided: June 22, 1914
Messrs. George C. Bedell and H. Bisbee for appellants.
Messrs. Frank L. Simpson, E. R. Gunby, and James F. Glen for appellees.
Mr. Justice Pitney delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hull Daily Mail

Content exists for this periodical, though at this stage it is not specifically organised beyond a basic hierarchy.
The pages listed below are an automatically generated listing.
Special:PrefixIndex/Hull Daily Mail/
# Hoadley v. San Francisco

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
94 U.S. 4
Hoadley v. San Francisco
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of California.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. S. W. Holladay for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. Delos Lake, contra.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hoard v. Chesapeake O. Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
123 U.S. 222
Hoard v. Chesapeake O. Railway Company
Enoch Totten, for appellant.
Wm. J. Robertson, for appellee.
MILLER, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hixson v. Oakes

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 254
Hixson v. Oakes
Argued: April 24, 1924. --- Decided: May 26, 1924
Mr. Ray E. Nimmo, of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. J. M. Friedlander and S. W. Odell, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hoag v. New Jersey

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinions

    Warren
    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
356 U.S. 464
Hoag v. New Jersey
Argued: Nov. 19, 1957. --- Decided: May 19, 1958
Mr. Robert E. Knowlton, Camden, for the petitioner.
Mr. David D. Furman, Trenton, for the respondent.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hixson v. Oakes/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 254
Hixson v. Oakes
Argued: April 24, 1924. --- Decided: May 26, 1924
Plaintiff in error, a regularly licensed pharmacist, was convicted of violating, September 8, 1921, an ordinance of Los Angeles construed to forbid the filling of a prescription which called for more than eight ounces of alcoholic liquor.
After sentence, under permitted practice, he challenged the validity of the ordinance by a habeas corpus proceeding commenced in the District Court of Appeal, upon the ground that it 'is unconstitutional and void, because it is in violation of the terms of the Eighteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and in violation of the terms of the National Prohibition Act.' 41 Stat. 305, c. 85 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138 1/4 et seq.).
Having declared, 'The single question presented for decision is whether the ordinance, in so far as it relates to the filling of prescriptions by licensed pharmacists, is valid and enforceable since the adoption of the Eighteenth Amendment and the enactment of the National Prohibition Law, commonly known as the Volstead Act,' the District Court of Appeal affirmed the validity of the ordinance and remanded plaintiff in error. Thereupon he sued out this writ of error. The assignment of errors alleges a conflict between the ordinance and the Fourteenth as well as the Eighteenth Amendment.
The petition for habeas corpus did not mention the Fourteenth Amendment. The opinion of the court below indicates it was there maintained that Congress by the Volstead Act granted some right or privilege which is protected by the Fourteenth Amendment and may not be abridged by state or municipality.
We do not stop to decide whether, considering plaintiff in error's clear right through a new petition to secure from the Supreme Court of California an unembarrassed determination of the question presented below (Matter of Zany, 164 Cal. 724, 130 Pac. 710), the assailed judgment is one 'in the highest court of a state in which a decision in the suit court be had,' within section 237, Judicial Code (Comp. St. § 1214). It is enough now to say that he has failed to raise any substantial federal question, and for that reason the writ of error must be dismissed. Neither the Eighteenth Amendment nor the Volstead Act grants the right to sell intoxicating liquors within a state. And certainly nothing in that act lends color to the suggestion that it endows a pharmacist with the right to dispense liquors for which he may claim the protection of the Fourteenth Amendment.
We go no further than to consider the points definitely raised upon the record and dispose of the present writ.
Dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hortsman v. Henshaw

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
52 U.S. 177
Hortsman v. Henshaw

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hortus Kewensis (1st edition)/Volume 1

HORTUS KEWENSIS;
OR, A
CATALOGUE
OF THE
PLANTS
CULTIVATED IN THE
ROYAL BOTANIC GARDEN AT KEW.
BY WILLIAM AITON, GARDENER TO HIS MAJESTY,
IN THREE VOLUMES.
VOL. I. MONANDRIA – HEPTANDRIA.
LONDON: PRINTED FOR GEORGE NICOL, BOOKSELLER TO HIS MAJESTY, PALL MALL.
M.DCC.LXXXIX.
Dedication Preface Books quoted Abbreviations
Monandria ...
# Hosea

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Hosea."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* A book of the Hebrew Bible; for versions, see Hosea (Bible).
* Biblical commentary and analysis
** "Hosea," in Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897)
** "Hosea, Prophecies of," in Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897)
** "Hosea" in Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible 4
# Hosea (Bible)

Hosea, formerly transliterated Osee, is a book of the Hebrew Bible. It is universally accepted across all Jewish and Christian biblical canons, but in the Jewish canon it is often included in the book of Minor Prophets, rather than as a distinct book.
    For commentaries and encyclopedia articles, see Hosea.
English-language translations of Hoshea include:
* "Osee" in the Wycliffe version of the Bible (1380s)
* "Osee" in the Bishops' version (1568)
* "Osee" in the Douay-Rheims version (1610)
* "Hosea" in the Authorized Version (1611)
* "Hosea" in the King James version (1769)
* "Hosea" in the American Standard version (1901)
* "Hosea" in the Jewish Publication Society version (1917)
* "Hosea" in the World English version (in progress since 1997)
* "Hosea" in the Wikisource edition (in progress since 2006)
* "Hosea" in the Literal Standard Version of the Bible (2020)
# Hortus Kewensis

Hortus Kewensis (Latin for "Kew Garden") was a catalogue of the plants at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. The first two editions were published by J. Hill in Latin. The third ("1st") edition was published in English by J. Banks's librarians under the name of W. Aiton, whose notes they used in the compilation of the work. The fourth ("2nd") edition was published under W. Aiton's name with its expansion and correction mostly done by his son W.T. Aiton.
* Hortus Kewensis (1768), by John Hill
* Hortus Kewensis, 2nd ed. (1769), by John Hill
* Hortus Kewensis, "1st" ed. (1789, 3 volumes), by William Aiton
* Hortus Kewensis, "2nd" ed. (1810–1813, 5 volumes), by William Townsend Aiton
# Hortus Kewensis (1st edition)

* Volume 1
* Volume 2
* Volume 3
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hortus Kewensis (1st edition)/Volume 1/Dedication

TO THE
KING.
Permit, Sir, a servant rendered happy by Your Majesty's benevolence, to obey the impulse of gratitude, which urges him to lay at Your Majesty's feet, this attempt to make public the present state of the Royal Botanic Garden at Kew.
Small as the book appears, the composition of it has cost him a large portion of the leisure allowed by the daily duties of his station, during more than fifteen years: in all that time it has been thought worthy the assistance of men more learned than himself; a circumstance, which flatters him with the hope, that it may not be found utterly unworthy of Your Majesty's inspection.
As throughout his life he has unremittingly attended to the studies of Horticulture ​and Botany, he may, without presumption, expect to have the fruits of his labours received with candour, by the cultivators of those valuable sciences; should they be approved, his gratification will be extreme; but his ambition has still a higher aim: the approbation of a Royal Master, to whom he is attached by every tie that gratitude, as well as duty, can impose, is what he seeks to deserve; and, should Your Majesty be graciously pleased to crown his labours by a single sentiment of applause, it will satisfy, to the utmost, the most elevated wishes of his heart; who is,
       with unfeigned humility,
          and uninterrupted attachment,
    Your Majesty's most devoted servant,
WILLIAM AITON.
# Hosford v. Germania Fire Insurance Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
127 U.S. 399
Hosford v. Germania Fire Insurance Company
[Statement of Case from pages 399-402 intentionally omitted]
T. M. Marquett and Isham Reavis, for plaintiffs in error.
S. Shellabarger and I. M. Wilson, for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice GRAY, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In Memory of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

In Memory of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Congressional Record: January 12, 2007 (Extensions of Remarks) Page E99. DOCID:cr12ja07-40.
IN MEMORY OF REV. DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.
______
HON. KENDRICK B. MEEK
OF FLORIDA
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Friday, January 12, 2007
Mr. MEEK of Florida. Madam Speaker, Dr. King brought the civil rights movement to every living room in this country. He marched for freedom in the face of unspeakable racial prejudice, yet preached a message of nonviolence, civility and tolerance. It took Dr. King's forceful movement and powerful words to bring about real and lasting change to this country.
This will be the first Martin Luther King, Jr. Day since the passing of Dr. King's wife, Mrs. Coretta Scott King, a legendary civil rights advocate who's memory we honored at a community wide march last year in Miami. During a time of national grief and unrest following Dr. King's assassination, she became a symbol of her husband's struggle for peace and unity. On this day, we also honor this wonderful matriarchal figure, a role model who helped lead the struggle for equality.
Minority communities face obstacles every day--poverty, unemployment, lack of healthcare, and access to housing. It is a tragic waste that 1 in 5 children live in poverty, including more than one-third of African American children.
Dr. King paved the way for so many people, including me, to assume roles of influence in this country. And for all this work, he created a more just society and made this country an even better place to live. On this day, let us work even harder toward fulfilling Dr. King's legacy of public service.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In My Merry Oldsmobile

Young Johnnie Steele has an Oldsmobile, He loves a dear little girl, She is the queen of his gas machine, She has his heart in a whirl.
Now, when they go for a spin, you know, She tries to learn the auto, so He lets her steer while he gets her ear, And whispers soft and low;
Come away with me Lucile In my merry Oldsmobile, Down the road of life we'll fly Automobubbling you and I.
To the church we'll swiftly steal, Then our wedding bells will peal, You can go as far as you like with me, In my merry Oldsmobile.
They love to spark in the dark old park, As they go flying along, She says she knows why the motor goes; The sparker's awfully strong.
Each day they spoon to the engine's tune, Their honeymoon will happen soon, He'll win Lucile with his Oldsmobile And then he'll fondly croon;
Come away with me Lucile In my merry Oldsmobile, Down the road of life we'll fly Automobubbling you and I.
To the church we'll swiftly steal, Then our wedding bells will peal, You can go as far as you like with me, In my merry Oldsmobile.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1945, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 78 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In Obitum M S, X° Maij, 1614

An epitaph for Browne's first wife, Timothy Eversfield, on her death in 1614.
* "In Obitum M S, X° Maij, 1614" in Pastoral Poems by Nicholas Breton, Selected Poetry by George Wither, and Pastoral Poetry by William Browne (1909).
* "In Obitum M.S. X° Maij, 1614" in the Oxford Book of English Verse 1250-1900 (1931).
* "In Obitum M.S. X° Maij, 1614" in the Oxford Book of English Verse 1250-1918 (1940).
# In Memory of an American Soldier

As rendered in The North American Review (June 1919):
IN MEMORY OF AN AMERICAN
SOLDIER
FALLEN IN FRANCE IN THE GLORIOUS YEAR 1918 BY FLORENCE EARLE COATES
He went singing down to death;  And the high Gods, who heard him, Gave something of their breath  To the melodies that stirred him; Lending some accents to his dying song That only to abiding things belong.
His boyish heart had laughed  For joy of life's completeness— Life had so brimmed the draught  It held for him with sweetness; But when, unlooked for, came the suppliant cry From tortured Lands, he put the full cup by.
Happy whose soul has wings  And has the strength to spread them! Happy whose heart still brings  Its dreams where truth first led them! Though he give all, his fellow men to save, He has a tryst with Life, beyond the grave!
Blithely he took the path  Appointed him by Duty, Whose face, viewed nearer, hath  Such deeps undreamed of beauty,— Love, hope, ambition—he put all aside, And for the things that do not perish, died.  ········ Soul, was it tragedy to fall like this? Oh, lovely, lovely, lovely, courage is!  And death itself may be most sweet, Though the lips thirst, and empty be the cup, If won in climbing—climbing up—and up,  To heights where vision and fulfilment meet: If won at last, by deeds that glorify Our lowly dust, where 'neath an alien sky, Their service unforgot, They sleep who, loving greatly, faltered not,—  The happy brave, who never knew defeat!
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1927, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 96 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In Nature

A collection of 177 poems.
English-language translations of V přírodě include:
Translations of poems that originally appeared in this work include:
* XXXI
* XLIV
* LXIII
# Howell v. Western Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
94 U.S. 463
Howell v. Western Railroad Company
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of North Carolina.
Mr. A. S. Merrimon for the appellant.
Mr. W. N. H. Smith, contra.
MR. JUSTICE MILLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Howitt v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
328 U.S. 189
Howitt v. United States
Argued: and Submitted Jan. 4, 1946. --- Decided: May 6, 1946
Mr. Bart A. Riley, of Miami, Fla., for petitioners.
Mr. Walter J. Cummings, Jr., of Washing, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Howland v. Blake

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
97 U.S. 624
Howland v. Blake
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
The case was argued by Mr. D. G. Hooker for the appellant, and by Mr. John T. Fish for the appellee.
MR. JUSTICE HUNT delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Howland v. Greenway

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
63 U.S. 491
Howland v. Greenway

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Howell Chevrolet Company v. National Labor Relations Board

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
346 U.S. 482
Howell Chevrolet Company v. National Labor Relations Board
Argued: Nov. 12, 1953. --- Decided: Dec 14, 1953
Mr. Erwin Lerten, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.
Mr. Marvin E. Frankel, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Opinion of the Court by Mr. Justice BLACK, announced by Mr. Justice REED.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ion

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Ion."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Ion, by Euripides, an ancient Greek tragedy.
* "Ion", by Plato, a dialogue on the nature of poetic performance.
* Ion, by Thomas Noon Talfourd, a five act play set in ancient Argos.
* "Ion," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
# Ion (Euripides)

* related portals: Ancient Greek drama.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Ἴων (Iōn, Latin: Ion), is a tragedy by Euripides, written between 414 and 412 BCE. It follows the orphan Ion as he discovers his origins.
English-language translations of Ἴων include:
* Ion, translated by Robert Potter (1781, 1783) 1st ed.
* Ion, translated by T. A. Buckley (1858)
* Ion, translated from the Paley text by E. P. Coleridge in The Plays of Euripides (1891) 1910 printing
* Ion, translated by Arthur S. Way in The Tragedies of Euripides, in English verse (1894)
This work is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago. Translations of this work may be copyrighted.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse