OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Marlborough and other poems/Peace

XVI
PEACE
There is silence in the evening when the long days cease, And a million men are praying for an ultimate release From strife and sweat and sorrow—they are praying for peace. But God is marching on.
Peace for a people that is striving to be free! Peace for the children of the wild wet sea! Peace for the seekers of the promised land—do we Want peace when God has none?
We pray for rest and beauty that we know we cannot earn, And ever are we asking for a honey-sweet return; But God will make it bitter, make it bitter, till we learn That with tears the race is run.
​And did not Jesus perish to bring to men, not peace, But a sword, a sword for battle and a sword that should not cease? Two thousand years have passed us. Do we still want peace Where the sword of Christ has shone?
Yes, Christ perished to present us with a sword, That strife should be our portion and more strife our reward, For toil and tribulation and the glory of the Lord And the sword of Christ are one.
If you want to know the beauty of the thing called rest, Go, get it from the poets, who will tell you it is best (And their words are sweet as honey) to lie flat upon your chest And sleep till life is gone.
I know that there is beauty where the low streams run, And the weeping of the willows and the big sunk sun, But I know my work is doing and it never shall be done, Though I march for ages on. ​Wild is the tumult of the long grey street, O, is it never silent from the tramping of their feet? Here, Jesus, is Thy triumph, and here the world's defeat, For from here all peace has gone.
There's a stranger thing than beauty in the ceaseless city's breast, In the throbbing of its fever—and the wind is in the west, And the rain is driving forward where there is no rest, For the Lord is marching on.
December 1912
# Marlborough and other poems/Return

V
RETURN
Still stand the downs so wise and wide? Still shake the trees their tresses grey? I thought their beauty might have died Since I had been away.
I might have known the things I love, The winds, the flocking birds' full cry, The trees that toss, the downs that move, Were longer things than I.
Lo, earth that bows before the wind, With wild green children overgrown, And all her bosoms, many-whinned, Receive me as their own.
The birds are hushed and fled: the cows Have ceased at last to make long moan. They only think to browse and browse Until the night is grown.
​The wind is stiller than it was, And dumbness holds the closing day. The earth says not a word, because It has no word to say.
The dear soft grasses under foot Are silent to the listening ear. Yet beauty never can be mute, And some will always hear.
18 September 1913
# Marlborough and other poems/Rooks 2

XX
ROOKS (II)
There is such cry in all these birds, More than can ever be express'd; If I should put it into words, You would agree it were not best To wake such wonder from its rest.
But since to-night the world is still And only they and I astir, We are united, will to will, By bondage tighter, tenderer Than any lovers ever were.
And if, of too much labouring, All that I see around should die (There is such sleep in each green thing, Such weariness in all the sky), We would live on, these birds and I.
Yet how? since everything must pass At evening with the sinking sun, And Christ is gone, and Barabbas, Judas and Jesus, gone, clean gone, Then how shall I live on?
​Yet surely Judas must have heard Amidst his torments the long cry Of some lone Israelitish bird, And on it, ere he went to die, Thrown all his spirit's agony.
And that immortal cry which welled For Judas, ever afterwards Passion on passion still has swelled And sweetened, till to-night these birds Will take my words, will take my words,
And wrapping them in music meet Will sing their spirit through the sky, Strange and unsatisfied and sweet— That, when stock-dead am I, am I, O, these will never die!
July 1913
# Maney v. Porter/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
45 U.S. 55
Maney v. Porter
Upon examining the bill in this case, it is not easy to determine, from the loose manner in which it is drawn, whether the complainant claimed the relief he asked for on the ground that the representations made to him by the defendant were false and fraudulent; or on the ground that the consideration for which the note was given had failed, because the defendant was unable to convey him a title to the Indian reservations.
It is evident, however, that the suit was not brought to uphold any title or right which the complainant claimed under the Choctaw treaty, or under the law of Congress which he states to have been passed upon the subject. For he does not ask for a conveyance of the reservations, nor of the Indian title to them. And he does not even aver that these claims are valid, or that he has any title to them; but, on the contrary, charges that none of the claims had been secured, and states that he did not think it probable that they would be obtained by the assignees of the Indians. And as the case has been removed here from the decision of a state court, we have no right to review it unless the complainant claimed some right under the treaty with the Choctaws or the act of Congress, and the decision of the state court had been against the right, title, or privilege specially set up by him; and even in that case, the power of revision given to this court extends no further than to the particular question thus raised and decided against the party. In the case before us, no such title, right, or privilege was claimed by the bill, and of course no decision was made against it in the state court. We therefore can exercise no jurisdiction in the case, and are not authorized to examine any questions of fraud or failure of consideration, or breach of contract, which the bill may be supposed to present, and upon which the court of the State of Tennessee may now decide.
Upon referring to the reports of this court, it will be seen that the 25th section of the act of Congress of 1789, under which this writ of error is brought, has been often the subject of examination and comment in this court, and the construction of the section and the practice under it well settled by many decisions. It is unnecessary to repeat here what the court have said upon former occasions. It is very clear, that this case is not within the provisions of the section, and the writ of error must therefore be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Manfred

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Manfred."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Manfred, by George Byron
* "Manfred," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
# Maney v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
278 U.S. 17
Maney v. United States
Argued: Oct. 11, 1928. --- Decided: Oct 22, 1928
Messrs. Bruno V. Bitker, of Milwaukee, Wis., Louis Marshall, of New York City, and Edwin S. Mack, of Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from page 18 intentionally omitted]
The Attorney General and Mr. W. D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 19-20 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Manfred, a dramatic poem

Manfred is a dramatic poem written in 1816–1817 by Lord Byron. It contains supernatural elements, in keeping with the popularity of the ghost story in England at the time. It is a typical example of a Romantic closet drama. Manfred was adapted musically by Robert Schumann in 1852, in a composition entitled Manfred: Dramatic Poem with music in Three Parts, and later by Pyotr Tchaikovsky in his Manfred Symphony, Op. 58, as well as by Carl Reinecke. Friedrich Nietzsche was impressed by the poem's depiction of a super-human being, and wrote some music for it.
    Warning: template has been deprecated.This transcription is of the first edition. The published work contains a small 'Notes' section; individual notes have been linked to the relevant lines in the text.
MANFRED.
T. DAVISON, LOMBARD-STREET, WHITEFRIARS, LONDON.
MANFRED,
A
DRAMATIC POEM.
BY LORD BYRON.
LONDON:
JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE-STREET.
1817.
DRAMATIS PERSONÆ.
Act I
* Act I, Scene I
* Act I, Scene II
Act II
* Act II, Scene I
* Act II, Scene II
* Act II, Scene III
* Act II, Scene IV
Act III
* Act III, Scene I
* Act III, Scene II
* Act III, Scene III
* Act III, Scene IV
* Notes
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Maurice Guest

* information about this edition.
* related portals: Australian literature.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
published 1908, was the author's first novel

## Part I

* Part I, Chapter I
* Part I, Chapter II
* Part I, Chapter III
* Part I, Chapter IV
* Part I, Chapter V
* Part I, Chapter VI
* Part I, Chapter VII
* Part I, Chapter VIII
* Part I, Chapter IX
* Part I, Chapter X
* Part I, Chapter XI
* Part I, Chapter XII
* Part I, Chapter XIII
* Part I, Chapter XIV

## Part II

* Part II, Chapter I
* Part II, Chapter II
* Part II, Chapter III
* Part II, Chapter IV
* Part II, Chapter V
* Part II, Chapter VI
* Part II, Chapter VII
* Part II, Chapter VIII
* Part II, Chapter IX
* Part II, Chapter X
* Part II, Chapter XI
* Part II, Chapter XII
* Part II, Chapter XIII

## Part III

* Part III, Chapter I
* Part III, Chapter II
* Part III, Chapter III
* Part III, Chapter IV
* Part III, Chapter V
* Part III, Chapter VI
* Part III, Chapter VII
* Part III, Chapter VIII
* Part III, Chapter IX
* Part III, Chapter X
* Part III, Chapter XI
* Part III, Chapter XII
* Part III, Chapter XIII
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1946, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 77 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
This work is in the public domain in Australia because it was created in Australia and the term of copyright has expired. According to Australian Copyright Council - Duration of Copyright, the following works are public domain:
* published non-government works whose author died before January 1, 1955,
* anonymous or pseudonymous works and photographs published before January 1, 1955, and
* government works published more than 50 years ago (before January 1, 1974).
This work is also in the public domain in the United States because it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days), and it was first published before 1989 without complying with U.S. copyright formalities (renewal and/or copyright notice) and it was in the public domain in Australia on the URAA date (January 1, 1996). This is the combined effect of Australia having joined the Berne Convention in 1928, and of 17 USC 104A with its critical date of January 1, 1996.
Because the Australian copyright term in 1996 was 50 years, the critical date for copyright in the United States under the URAA is January 1, 1946.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Maurer v. Hamilton

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
309 U.S. 598
MAURER et al. v. HAMILTON, Sec. of Revenue of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al.
Argued: March 27, 28, 1940. --- Decided: April 22, 1940
Messrs. Sterling G. McNees, Edmund M. Brady, and Gilbert Nurick, all of Harrisburg, Pa., for appellants.
Mr. George W. Keitel, of Harrisburg, Pa., for appellees.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Maurice Guest/Part I

S’amor non e che dunque e quel ch’io sento? Ma s’egli e amor, per Dio, che cosa e quale?
* Part I, Chapter I
* Part I, Chapter II
* Part I, Chapter III
* Part I, Chapter IV
* Part I, Chapter V
* Part I, Chapter VI
* Part I, Chapter VII
* Part I, Chapter VIII
* Part I, Chapter IX
* Part I, Chapter X
* Part I, Chapter XI
* Part I, Chapter XII
* Part I, Chapter XIII
* Part I, Chapter XIV
# Maurice Guest/Part III

. . . dove il Sol tace.
* Part III, Chapter I
* Part III, Chapter II
* Part III, Chapter III
* Part III, Chapter IV
* Part III, Chapter V
* Part III, Chapter VI
* Part III, Chapter VII
* Part III, Chapter VIII
* Part III, Chapter IX
* Part III, Chapter X
* Part III, Chapter XI
* Part III, Chapter XII
* Part III, Chapter XIII
# Men-at-the-Bar/Banerjei, Chunder Nath

​Banerjei, Chunder Nath, of St. Paul's Univ. of Calcutta, deputy magistrate and deputy collector Bengal civil service, a student of Lincoln's Inn 31 May, 1880 (then aged 38), called to the bar 6 June, 1883 (eldest son of late Banerjei (sic), a deputy magistrate and deputy collector Bengal civil service); born , 1842.
    Calcutta.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Balmer, John Percival

​Balmer, John Percival, M.A., B.C.L. Oriel Coll., Oxon, H.M.'s inspector of schools since 1873, assistant education commissioner in Ireland 1868-71, a student of Lincoln's Inn 6 Nov., 1863 (then aged 24), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1866 (eldest son of John Balmer, Esq., of London); born 4 Nov., 1839; married 19 Oct., 1871, Carrie, 2nd dau. of Henry Turner, Esq., of St. Briavel's, Southsea.
    5, Pittville Lawn, Cheltenham.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Banks, Andrew Rae

​Banks, Andrew Rae, LL.D., St. John's Coll., Camb., 1884, equity draftsman and conveyancer, practises in Lancaster Chancery Court, a student of Lincoln's Inn 18 April, 1877 (then aged 25), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1880 (eldest son of Henry Banks, of Liverpool, merchant); born , 1852.
    Rice House, West Derby, Liverpool; 5, Eldon Road, Kensington, S.W.; 7, New Square, W,C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bankes, Wynne Albert

​Bankes, Wynne Albert, B.A., Trin. Hall, Camb., 1864, midshipman R.N., served in Baltic and Black Seas 1854-5 (two medals and a clasp), J.P., D.L. Dorset, a student of the Inner Temple 8 Nov., 1864 (then aged 24), called to the bar 11 June, 1867 (6th son of late Rt. Hon. George Bankes, late of Kingston Lacy, Wimborne, Dorset, dec.); born 31 May, 1840; married 10 Sept., 1873, Florence Mary Anna, 2nd dau. of Rev. Frederick Fane, of Moyles Court, Hants (see Foster's Peerage, E. Westmorland).
    Wolfeton House, Dorchester; Arthur's and St. James' Clubs.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Ballantine, William

​Ballantine, William, author of Experiences of a Barrister's Life, From the Old World to the New, a revising barrister on the Home circuit 1839-43, a student of the Inner Temple 28 May, 1829 (then aged 17), called to the bar 6 June, 1834, serjeant-at-law 3 Nov., 1856, with patent of precedence 12 Jan., 1863, an honorary bencher of his Inn, 22 Nov., 1878 (eldest son of William Ballantine, Esq., bar.-at-law, of the Inner Temple); born , 1812; married 4 Dec, 1841, Eliza, dau. of Henry Gyles, Esq., of London.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Ballantine, William Henry Walter

​Ballantine, William Henry Walter, LL.B., Trin. Hall, Camb., 1870, a member of the South-eastern circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 15 April, 1867 (then aged 20), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1871 (eldest son of Mr. Serjeant Ballantine, of London); born , 1847; married 6 April, 1876, Eleanor Mitchell, widow, dau. of Richard Brasier, gent.
    117, Piccadilly, W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Ballou, George Michael

​Ballou, George Michael, a student of the Middle Temple 1 Nov., 1878, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1883 (5th son of Michael Ballou, of Gibraltar, merchant); born , .
    Gibraltar.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Balston, Thomas

​Balston, Thomas, M.A., Brasenose Coll., Oxon, 1847, a student of the Inner Temple 15 April, 1845 (then aged 23), called to the bar 9 June, 1848 (7th son of William Balston, Esq., of Springfield, Maidstone, Kent); born , 1822; married 24 Oct., 1861, Ellen Frances, only surviving dau. of Rev. W. M. Oliver, rector of Bovinger, Essex.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Banerjea, Jitendra Nath

​Banerjea, Jitendra Nath (changed his name), a student of the Middle Temple 25 Oct., 1880, called to the bar 6 June, 1883 (5th son of late Dr. Duego Ch. Bandyohadlayay, of Calcutta, medical practitioner); born 1858.
    Calcutta.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Bankes, John Eldon

​Bankes, John Eldon, B.A., Univ. Coll., Oxon, 1876, a member of the North Wales and Chester circuit, J.P. Flintshire, educated at Eton, a student of the Inner Temple 16 Nov., 1874 (then aged 20), called to the bar 18 Nov., 1878 (eldest son of John Scott Bankes, Esq., J.P., D.L., of Soughton Hall, Flintshire); born 17 April, 1854; married 10 Aug., 1882, Edith, eldest dau. of Robert Peel Ethelston, Esq., of Hinton, Whitchurch, Salop (see Foster's Peerage, E. Eldon).
    3, Durham Place, Tedworth Square, Chelsea, S.W.; 4, Elm Court, Temple, E.C.
# McCaughn v. Real Estate Land Title & Trust Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
297 U.S. 606
McCaughn v. Real Estate Land Title & Trust Company
Argued: March 13, 1936. --- Decided: March 30, 1936
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and J. P. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Mr. Franklin S. Edmonds, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondents.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McCaughn v. Hershey Chocolate Company (282 U.S. 827)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
282 U.S. 827
McCaughn v. Hershey Chocolate Company

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McCaughn v. Hershey Chocolate Company (282 U.S. 827)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
282 U.S. 827
McCaughn v. Hershey Chocolate Company
and
The Attorney General and Claude R. Branch, of Providence, R. I., Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for the Collectors.
Oct. 20, 1930.
Petition for writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McCaughn v. Hershey Chocolate Company (283 U.S. 488)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
283 U.S. 488
McCaughn v. Hershey Chocolate Company
Argued: April 21, 22, 1931. --- Decided: May 18, 1931
The Attorney General and Mr. Claude R. Branch, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., of Providence, R. I., for petitioners.
Mr. Wm. Clarke Mason, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondents.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McCaughn v. Ludington

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
268 U.S. 106
McCaughn v. Ludington
Argued: Jan. 12, 1925. --- Decided: April 13, 1925
Mr. Solicitor General Beck, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Mr. Wm. D. Guthrie, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice SANFORD delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Clayton, Henry Reginald

​Clayton, Henry Reginald, M.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1882, LL.B. 1877, a student of the Inner Temple 23 Jan., 1879 (then aged 23), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1881 (2nd son of John Richard Clayton, artist, of London); born 1856.
    4, New Square, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Cleaver, Arnold Jeffries

​Cleaver, Arnold Jeffries, matric. London Univ. 1869 from Liverpool Coll., a member of the Northern circuit, a student of the Middle Temple 13 Nov., 1869, called to the bar 17 Nov., 1874 (4th son of William Cleaver, of Sandfield Park, West Derby, Liverpool, clerk to West Derby Union and superintendent registrar of West Derby and Toxteth Park district); born , .
    1, Cook Street, Liverpool.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Cleaver, William Edward

​Cleaver, William Edward, L.L.B., St. John's Coll., Camb., 1884 (B.A. 1883), matric. London Univ. 1878 from Queen's Royal Coll., Trinidad, a student of the Middle Temple 8 Oct., 1880, called to the bar 17 Nov., 1883 (2nd son of Charles Cleaver, of Trinidad, gent.).
    1, Staple Inn, Holborn, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Clementson, Wilfred Kendall

​Clementson, Wilfred Kendall, B.A. (scholar), Pembroke Coll., Camb., 1853, J.P. for Behar and Orissa, Bengal uncovenanted civil service, formerly assistant deputy commissioner of Cachar, a student of Lincoln's Inn 25 Jan., 1865 (then aged 35), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1866 (eldest son of Joseph Clementson, Esq., late of Cockermouth, dec.); born , 1830.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Cleave, John Jones

​Cleave, John Jones, a member of the Oxford circuit, J.P. Monmouthshire, a student of the Inner Temple 14 Nov., 1844 (then aged 22), called to the bar 7 June, 1850 (only son of John Cleave, Esq., of Hereford, clerk of the peace for Herefordshire); born , 1822; married 16 Aug., 1860, Matilda Henrietta Hamilton, only dau. of late Capt. W. J. Phillott, of the Bengal army.
    Buckhurst Hill.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Clementi, Montagu

​Clementi, Montagu, lt.-col. Bengal staff corps 1884, deputy judge advocate 1876, 4th class Osmanieh, a student of Lincoln's Inn 18 Nov., 1872 (then aged 33), called to the bar 6 June, 1874 (4th son of Rev. John Clementi-Smith, M.A., late of Buckhurst Hill, Essex, dec.); born 25 April, 1839.
    Calcutta.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Clerk, John

​Clerk, John, Q.C., J.P. co. Leicester, author of Practical Treatise on the Law of Elections, a student of the Inner Temple 16 April, 1883 (then aged 22), called to the bar 11 June, 1841, Q.C. 22 Feb., 1868, bencher 28 April, 1868, treasurer 1884–5 (3rd son of Sir George Clerk, Bart., of Penicuik, Midlothian); born 16 April, 1816; married 9 Dec., 1845, Rose Alice Clothilde, 2nd dau. of Thomas Greene, Esq., of Whittington Hall, co. Lancaster, and has issue (see Foster's Baronetage and Foster's Our Noble and Gentle Families).
    Rolleston Hall, Billesden, Leicester; 10, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.; 38, Parliament Street, S.W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Clayton, William Clayton

​Clayton, William Clayton, M.A. (late fellow), Jesus Coll., Camb., 1825, D.L. co. Durham, assumed the surname of Clayton in lieu of his patronymic Walters 1849, a student of Lincoln's Inn 5 Nov., 1821 (then aged 22), called to the bar 13 May, 1825 (2nd son of Robert Walters, Esq., of Newcastle-upon-Tyne); born 13 Aug., 1799; married 6 Nov., 1834, Elizabeth, dau. of Edward Chapman, Esq., of Whitby, and has issue (see Foster's Yorkshire Collection).
    Bishop's Down House, Tunbridge Wells; Bradford Abbas, Sherborne, Dorset.