OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Diary of the times of Charles II/Volume 1/Sir Gabriel Sylvius to Mr. Sidney, February 24

SIR GABRIEL SYLVIUS TO MR. SIDNEY.
De Londre, 24me de Fevrier.
Je ne me suis pas donné I'honneur, Monsieur, de vous écrire depuis mon arrivée ici, à cause
​que j'etois assuré que my Lord Sunderlandt tous donnoit connoissance tous les ordinaires des progrés que nous faissions auprés du Roy. My Lord Sunderlandt, par son addresse et industrie, a mis les choses à présent dans la perfection, et le Roy a fait de point en point tout ce que Monsieur Le Prince auroit pu souhaiter. Je crois que ce que je leur ay dit sur les affaires y a un pu contribué, leur ayant remontré le succès que vous aviez eu, vous apprenant que le Roy et les Ministres et genéralement tout le monde est extraordinairement satisfait de votre conduite.
My Lord Sunderlant m'a dit aujourdhui que de Roy m'avoit nommé pour m'énvoyer au Prince de Luxembourg. Et que luy et Monsieur Godolphin avoient écrit aujourdhui a Monsieur Le Prince esperant qu'il l'approuveroit, ne doutant point que cela ne fit un très bon effet auprès de Messrs. les Etats, lors qu'ils verront que Sa Majesté employe une personne qui est au service de Monsieur Le Prince. Si Son Altesse ne vous en parle pas, je vous prie de ne luy rien dire, n'y même à personne, car la chose est encore icy secrette et personne n'en sait rien, et elle ne sera pas divulguée jusques a ce que le Roy l'aye declarée au Conseil.
Je croy que vous savez par d^autres voyes l'arrivée ​de Monsieur Le Due, qui a produit beaucoup de bruit de canon et des cloches lesquelles sonnent éncores à présent: tout le monde en général a temoigné assez de joye de son venue, et plus même que je n'avois crue. La Poste va partir et je n'ay que ce moment pour vous assurer que personne n'est plus veritablement votre très humble et très affectioné serviteur,
Gabriel Sylvius.
# Diary of the times of Charles II/Volume 1/Mr. Sidney to the Prince of Orange, November 4

MR. SIDNEY TO THE PRINCE OF ORANGE.
November 4.
Sir,
I had writ to you by the last post, but that I was kept a Friday so long at the Council about the examination of the person I told you of at Soesdyke, that I could not have time to write to you, which otherwise I should not have failed of, though I could not hope to have informed you of any ​thing pleasing. The best news I can tell you is, the King shows great concern for you in every particular, and would be very glad to have you approve the measures he does intend to take, which are not to be written, and, therefore, I am to make haste over, that you may be fully acquainted with every thing.
You will find great changes since I waited upon you at Dieren, and I doubt you will not say they are for the better. I can scarcely forbear writing freely my whole mind, but I must consider the uncertainty of a letter, and defer it till I have the honour to see you, which I hope to do the latter end of the next week; for the present, I will only tell you that the chief business which we apprehended, I am satisfied, is not so bad as we imagined, and I hope never will. The King, I think, is as well in his health as he hath been these many years: he is much abroad, and these last days hath been taken up in the examination of a new plot, which now makes as much noise as the former did. The principal person concerned is one Mr. Willoughby, who saith that my Lord Arundel and my Lord Powys have hired him to kill the King, which he refused; then they offered him £500 to kill my Lord Shaftesbury, and that he undertook: ​this is believed by a great many, but others will give no credit to it, he being known to be as great a rogue as any in England.
# Diary of the times of Charles II/Volume 1/Preface

PREFACE.
Henry Sidney, Earl of Romney, who died in 1704, appointed his nephews, Thomas Pelham, Henry Pelham, and John Sidney, his executors; and, among other things, he bequeathed to Thomas Pelham his cabinets and his papers.
Thomas Pelham, who was the eldest son of Sir John Pelham, married, for his first wife, Elizabeth, the daughter of Sir William Jones. His second wife was Grace, the daughter of Gilbert, Earl of Clare, sister of John Holles, Duke of Newcastle, who died in 1700. Their eldest son was Thomas Pelham, Duke of Newcastle, the minister. He was created Baron Pelham, of Laughton, and died in 1712. Henry Pelham, the second brother, married Frances, daughter and coheir of John Bynde, Esq. He died in 1712; and from him the present Earl of Chichester, the possessor of the Sidney and the Pelham Manuscripts, is directly descended.
In selecting and preparing these papers for publication, and in searching for cotemporary notices illustrative of facts and persons, I have met with that assistance from my friends which I take this opportunity gratefully to acknowledge. From the ​Rev. Philip Stanhope Dodd, the rector of Penshurst, who, eighteen years ago, aided and encouraged me in a kindred pursuit, and whose offices of kindness and friendship have never been relaxed, I have again received much valuable information; and to him, to Mr. Serjeant D'Oyly, Mr. Markland, and Mr. Herman Merivale, I feel grateful, not only for encouragement to proceed, but for matter which has much improved the work.
To Mr. Upcott I beg to offer my best thanks for the liberal manner in which, upon my application to him, he opened to me all those valuable stores of manuscripts from which I have drawn so largely. Nor should I do justice to my feelings, if I did not take this opportunity of testifying my obligation to Lord Stanley of Alderley, Sir Henry Ellis, Mr. Ormerod, and Mr. Brooke, for the trouble they have taken to assist me in my inquiries. For the portrait of the Honourable Henry Sidney prefixed to the first volume of this work, I am indebted to the courtesy of Lord de Lisle, who kindly permitted a copy to be made from the original picture in his possession.
R. W. B.
12, Hereford Street, May 20, 1843.
* ↑ See Pedigree.
* ↑ The reader will judge how greatly I have been assisted by my friend, Mr. Markland, when I state that I am obliged to him entirely for the valuable note, vol. ii. p. 281, in reference to the Divines recommended by Burnet to William for promotion.
# Diary of the times of Charles II/Volume 1/Mr. Spencer to Mr. Sidney, January 10

MR. SPENCER TO MR. SIDNEY.
London, January 10.
Most Honoured Sir,
As bad news comes not too late, so good news cannot be sent too soon or too often; wherefore, lest mine of the last post miscarry, I thought it my part to tell you in this that you had the good day on Thursday last; the business was so clear on your side, and the cause so good and conscientious, ​hat, as soon as I had given in my evidence, all the judges stood up for yon, and the jury gave a verdict at the bar for you without stirring, though Lord Leycester's councel thought to suppress my evidence upon my annuity, but I had released that—this was what they relied on most, and to make my Lord's answer and my oath disagree, and to prove me a knave, but, thank God! I had a better character from the judges and all the court and the jury. We are now continuing to bring on your business for the further and quicker despatch in Chancery. I dare assure you, sir, you need not be afraid of that cruel tyrant, who may shew his teeth but cannot bite. I hear he storms and swears like mad; calls me a hundred rogues, which I am glad to hear, because it is for discharging a good conscience and securing you. He is so hampered now that he knows not where to be.
I have received yours of the 9th, and will enquire for Palma wine, but doubt 'tis not a good time for that, but will get you a pure Canary if you please to signify your will in it; however, I will adventure to send a hamper by the first ship. This night Sir John Felham intends to send for the horse, and it will be Saturday ere it can be here. The groom has been to enquire after him and the ​dogs. Your friends here, and they are many, rejoice at your good success in this afiair; not so my Lord of Leycester, and in the country my poor wife writes that all are startled, some are glad, and some are afraid; let them tremble still, whilst I with a thousand more rejoice at your prosperity.
I am, Sir,
Your most obliged, most faithful,
Most humble servant,
G. Spencer.
# Diary of the times of Charles II/Volume 1/Sir Henry Capel to Mr. Sidney, February 7

SIR HENRY CAPEL TO MR. SIDNEY.
February 7th.
Sir,
I received the kind favour of yours with great
​satisfaction, as nothing that comes from you shall ever find other from me.
I have now sent you the estimates of the four ​first rates of ships, calculated by as able an hand as any in the Navy.
Sir, before this comes to your hands, I doubt not but your news-letter may have told you of my having resigned my place in the Council, and consequently my employment in the same. It is possible I may be under the hard censure of many, but, to obtain a favourable construction from the Prince, I honestly ask your assistance. Be pleased to assure his Highness of my loyalty on all occasions to serve the King; but, since the practice in affairs has been contrary to the measures declared, when first I had the honour to sit there, ​and that the dark hopes of a Parliament sitting makes men under my circumstances to lend little support to the Government. I thought it most modesty with those fellow Commissioners who came in together, humbly to beg leave to retire. In short, I preserve the same principles as when last we parted, and 'tis neither honour nor profit can make me desert them.
To be in a station where exercised, they prove ill-timed, and if forborne, a reproach to my honour and conscience suits not with my temper. Pardon this long scribble from him who truly is
Yours for ever,
Hen. Capel.
# Detroit Mackinac Railway Company v. Michigan Railroad Commission (235 U.S. 402)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
235 U.S. 402
Detroit Mackinac Railway Company v. Michigan Railroad Commission
Argued: December 2, 1914. --- Decided: December 14, 1914
Messrs. Fred A. Baker and James McNamara for appellant.
Mr. Edward S.C.lark and Mr. Grant Fellows, Attorney General of Michigan, for appellees.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Detroit International Bridge Company v. Corporation Tax Appeal Board of Michigan (294 U.S. 83)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
294 U.S. 83
Detroit International Bridge Company v. Corporation Tax Appeal Board of Michigan
Argued: Dec. 14, 1934. --- Decided: Jan 14, 1935
Messrs. Victor Klein, of Detroit, Mich., Alfred A. Cook, of New York City, and Thomas G. Long, of Detroit, Mich., for appellant.
Messrs. Patrick H. O'Brien and Alice E. Alexander, both of Lansing, Mich., for respondent.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Detroit Mackinac Railway Company v. Michigan Railroad Commission (240 U.S. 564)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
240 U.S. 564
Detroit Mackinac Railway Company v. Michigan Railroad Commission
Argued: and submitted November 10, 1915. --- Decided: April 3, 1916
Messrs. James McNamara and Fred A. Baker for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 564-566 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. David H. Crowley and I. S.C.anfleld, and Mr. Grant Fellows, Attorney General of Michigan, for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice Van Devanter delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Detroit International Bridge Company v. Corporation Tax Appeal Board of Michigan

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Detroit International Bridge Company v. Corporation Tax Appeal Board of Michigan."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Detroit International Bridge Company v. Corporation Tax Appeal Board of Michigan (287 U.S. 295)
* Detroit International Bridge Company v. Corporation Tax Appeal Board of Michigan (294 U.S. 83)
# Detroit International Bridge Company v. Corporation Tax Appeal Board of Michigan (287 U.S. 295)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
287 U.S. 295
Detroit International Bridge Company v. Corporation Tax Appeal Board of Michigan
Argued: Nov. 11, 1932. --- Decided: Dec 5, 1932
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the State of Michigan.
Messrs. Victor W. Klein, of Detroit, Mich., Alfred A. Cook, of New York City, and Thomas G. Long, of Detroit, Mich., for appellant.
Alice E. Alexander and Mr. Paul W. Voorhies, both of Lansing, Mich., for appellee.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Detroit Mackinac Railway Company v. Michigan Railroad Commission

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Detroit Mackinac Railway Company v. Michigan Railroad Commission."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Detroit Mackinac Railway Company v. Michigan Railroad Commission (235 U.S. 402)
* Detroit Mackinac Railway Company v. Michigan Railroad Commission (240 U.S. 564)
# Constitutional Imperialism in Japan/Preface

Preface
This pamphlet is an attempt to give a bird's-eye view of the progress and position of constitutional government and representative institutions in Japan. It does not pretend to enter into a detailed discussion of the various questions which naturally arise; and yet it may serve as an introduction to a more thorough study. The Appendix contains the principal documents necessary for such a study. It may, indeed, seem that the Appendix is disproportionately large and that an operation should have been performed. But the material there reproduced is of such importance that it could not well have been omitted or abridged. If any desire a more detailed study of the subject of this pamphlet, they are referred to Uyehara's Political Development of Japan, from which we have often quoted. We only hope that the brief study of this pamphlet may arouse a deep interest in more profound investigation.
Ernest Wilson Clement.
Tokyo, Japan, December 30, 1915.
# Constitutional Imperialism in Japan/Bibliography

Bibliography.
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Ariarathes II.

​II. Son of Holophernes, fled into Armenia after the death of Ariarathes I. After the death of Eumenes, b. c. 315, he recovered Cappadocia with the assistance of Ardoates, the Armenian king, and killed Amyntas, the Macedonian governor. He was succeeded by Ariamnes II., the eldest of his three sons. (Diod. xxxi. Ecl. 3.)
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Aristonidas

​ARISTONIDAS, a statuary, one of whose productions is mentioned by Pliny (H. N. xxxiv. 14. s. 40) as extant at Thebes in his time. It was a statue of Athamas, in which bronze and iron had been mixed together, that the rust of the latter, showing through the brightness of the bronze, might have the appearance of a blush, and so might indicate the remorse of Athamas. [C. P. M.]
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Ariarathes I.

​I. The son of Ariamnes I., was distinguished for his love of his brother Holophernes, whom he sent to assist Ochus in the recovery of Egypt, b. c. 350. After the death of Alexander, Perdiccas appointed Eumenes governor of Cappadocia; but upon Ariarathes refusing to submit to Eumenes, Perdiccas made war upon him. Ariarathes was defeated, taken prisoner, and crucified, together with many of his relations, b. c. 322. Eumenes then obtained possession of Cappadocia. Ariarathes was 82 years of age at the time of his death: he had adopted as his son, Ariarathes, the eldest son of his brother Holophernes. (Diod. xxxi. Ecl. 3, where it is stated that he fell in battle; Diod. xviii. 16; Arrian, ap. Phot. Cod. 92, p. 69, b. 26. ed. Bekker; Appian, Mithr. 8; Lucian, Macrob. 13; Plut. Eumen. 3; Justin, xiii. 6, whose account is quite erroneous.)
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Ariarathes III.

​III. Son of Ariamnes II., and grandson of the preceding, married Stratonice, a daughter of Antiochus II., king of Syria, and obtained a share in the government during the life-time of his father. (Diod. l. c.)
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Aristonides

​ARISTONIDES, a painter of some distinction, mentioned by Pliny (xxxv. 11. s. 40), was the father and instructor of Mnasitimus. [C. P. M.]
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Aristonous 1.

​ARISTO′NOUS (Ἀριστόνοος). 1. Of Gela in Syracuse, one of the founders of the colony of Agrigentum, B. C. 582. (Thuc. vi. 4.)
2. Of Pella, son of Peisaeus, one of the bodyguard of Alexander the Great, distinguished himself greatly on one occasion in India. On the death of Alexander, he was one of the first to propose that the supreme power should be entrusted to Perdiccas. He was subsequently the general of Olympias in the war with Cassander; and when she was taken prisoner in B. C. 316, he was put to death by order of Cassander. (Arrian, Anab. vi. 28, ap. Phot. Cod. 92, p. 69, a. 14. ed. Bekker; Curt. ix. 5, x. 6; Diod. xix. 35, 50, 51.)
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Aristonous 2.

​ARISTO′NOUS (Ἀριστόνοος), a statuary, a native of Aegina, made a statue of Zeus, which was dedicated by the Metapontines at Olympia. (Paus. V. 22. §5; Müller, Aegin. p. 107.) [C. P. M, ]
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Ariarathes IV.

​IV. Son of the preceding, was a child at his accession, and reigned b. c. 220–163, about 57 years. (Diod. l. c.; Justin. xxix. 1; Polyb. iv. 2.) He married Antiochis, the daughter of Antiochus III., king of Syria, and, in consequence of this alliance, assisted Antiochus in his war against the Romans. After the defeat of Antiochus by the Romans, b. c. 190, Ariarathes sued for peace in 188, which he obtained on favourable terms, as his daughter was about that time betrothed to Eumenes, the ally of the Romans. In b. c. 183–179, he assisted Eumenes in his war against Pharnaces. Polybius mentions that a Roman embassy was sent to Ariarathes after the death of Antiochus IV., who died b. c. 164. Antiochis, the wife of Ariarathes, at first bore him no children, and accordingly introduced two supposititious ones, who were called Ariarathes and Holophernes. Subsequently, however, she bore her husband two daughters and a son, Mithridates, afterwards Ariarathes V., and then informed Ariarathes of the deceit she had practised upon him. The other two were in consequence sent away from Cappadocia, one to Rome, the other to Ionia. (Liv. xxxvii. 31, xxxviii. 38, 39; Polyb. xxii. 24, xxv. 2, 4, xxvi. 6, xxxi 12, 13; Appian, Syr. 5, 32, 42; Diod. l. c.)
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Ariarathes V.

​V. Son of the preceding, previously called Mithridates, reigned 33 years, b. c. 163–130. He was surnamed Philopator, and was distinguished by the excellence of his character and his cultivation of philosophy and the liberal arts. According to Livy (xlii. 19), he was educated at Rome; but this account may perhaps refer to the other Ariarathes, one of the supposititious sons of the late king. In consequence of rejecting, at the wish of the Romans, a marriage with the sister of Demetrius Soter, the latter made war upon him, and brought forward Holophernes, one of the supposititious sons of the late king, as a claimant of the throne. Ariarathes was deprived of his kingdom, and fled to Rome about b. c. 158. He was restored by the Romans, who, however, appear to have allowed Holophernes to reign jointly with him, as is expressly stated by Appian (Syr. 47), and implied by Polybius (xxxii. 20). The joint government, however, did not last long; for we find Ariarathes shortly afterwards named as sole king. In b. c. 154, Ariarathes assisted Attalus in his war against Prusias, and sent his son Demetrius in command of his forces. He fell in b. c. 130, in the war of the Romans against Aristonicus of Pergamus. In return for the succours which he had brought the Romans on that occasion, Lycaonia and Cilicia were added to the dominions of his family. By his wife Laodice he had six children; but they were all, with the exception of the youngest, killed by their mother, that she might obtain the government of the kingdom. After she
​had been put to death by the people on account of her cruelty, her youngest son succeeded to the crown. (Diod. l. c., Exc. xxiv. p. 626, ed. Wess.; Polyb. iii. 5, xxxii. 20, 23, xxxiii. 12; Justin, xxxv. 1, xxxvii. 1.)
# Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology/Aristonymus

​ARISTO′NYMUS (Ἀριστώνυμος), a comic poet and contemporary of Aristophanes and Ameipsias. (Anonym. in Vit. Aristoph.; Schol. ad Platon. p. 331, Bekker.) We know the titles of only two of his comedies, viz. Theseus (Athen. iii. p. 87), and Ἥλιος ῥιγῶν (Athen. vii. pp. 284, 287), of which only a few fragments are extant. Schweighäuser and Fabricius place this poet in the reign of Ptolemy Philadelphus, an error into which both were led by Suidas (s.v.Ἀριστώνυμος), who, if the reading is correct, evidently confounds the poet with some grammarian. If there had ever existed a grammarian of this name, and if he had written the works attributed to him by Suidas, he would assuredly have been mentioned by other writers also. This is not the case; and as we know that Aristophanes of Byzantium was the successor of Apollonius as chief librarian at Alexandria (which Suidas says of Aristonymus), Meineke conjectures with great probability, that the name of Aristophanes has dropped out in our text of Suidas. (Meineke, Hist. Crit. Com. Gr. p. 196, &c.)
An Athenian, of the name of Aristonymus, who was a contemporary of Alexander the Great, but not a grammarian, is mentioned by Athenaeus. (x. p. 452, xii. p. 538.) There were also two writers of this name, but neither of them appears to have been a grammarian, (Plut. de Flum. p. 1165; Stobaeus, passim.) [L. S.]