OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Jerusalem 1500

* related portals: United States#United States Department of State, Non-fiction, Modern, Titles#J.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Jerusalem 1500 is a cable message that was sent in May 1978 from the United States Consulate General in Jerusalem to the United States Department of State in Washington, D.C. reporting abusive methods allegedly used systematically by Israeli authorities to interrogate Palestinian detainees in Jerusalem and the West Bank. Along with a subsequent cable, Jerusalem 3239, Jerusalem 1500 became the subject of controversy when its contents became public in February 1979. Originally classified "confidential," the cable was declassified in 2008 and released in full in 2009 pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act request.

## Contents

* Section 1
* Section 2
* Section 3
* Section 4

## Notes

* ↑ T.R. Reid and Edward Cody, "U.S. Reports Indicate Israeli Abuse of Palestinians," The Washington Post, February 7, 1979, p. A1.
* ↑ United States Department of State Review Authority: Sharon E. Ahmad, Date/Case ID: 28 Aug 2009/200901506; Facsimile available on Wikimedia Commons at .
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jerusalem. The Emanation of the Giant Albion/To the Jews

Published 1804.
[ Plate 27 ]
To the Jews
Jerusalem the Emanation of the Giant Albion! Can it be? Is it a Truth that the Learned have explored? Was Britain the Primitive Seat of the Patriarchal Religion? If it is true: my title-page is also True, that Jerusalem was & is the Emanation of the Giant Albion. It is True, and cannot be controverted. Ye are united O ye Inhabitants of Earth in One Religion. The Religion of Jesus: the most Ancient, the Eternal: & the Everlasting Gospel—The Wicked will turn it to Wickedness, the Righteous to Righteousness. Amen! Huzza! Selah!
“All things Begin & End in Albions Ancient Druid Rocky Shore.”
Your Ancestors derived their origin from Abraham, Heber, Shem and Noah, who were Druids: as the Druid Temples (which are the Patriarchal Pillars & Oak Groves) over the whole Earth witness to this day.
You have a tradition, that Man anciently containd in his mighty limbs all things in Heaven & Earth: this you recieved from the Druids.
“But now the Starry Heavens are fled from the mighty limbs of Albion”
Albion was the Parent of the Druids; & in his Chaotic State of Sleep Satan & Adam & the whole World was Created by the Elohim.
If Humility is Christianity; you O Jews are the true Christians; If your tradition that Man contained in his Limbs, all Animals, is True & they were separated from him by cruel Sacrifices: and when compulsory cruel Sacrifices had brought Humanity into a Feminine Tabernacle, in the loins of Abraham & David: the Lamb of God, the Saviour became apparent on Earth as the Prophets had foretold? The Return of Israel is a Return to Mental Sacrifice & War. Take up the Cross O Israel & follow Jesus.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Long v. Rockwood

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
277 U.S. 142
Long v. Rockwood
Argued: Jan. 20, 1928. --- Decided: May 14, 1928
Mr. F. Delano Putnam, of Boston, Mass., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 142-144 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Merrill S. June and Thomas H. Gage, both of Worcester, Mass., for respondent.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Long v. Parker

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
384 U.S. 32
Long v. Parker
James X. C. Long, pro se.
Solicitor General Marshall, for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Long v. Parker/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
384 U.S. 32
Long v. Parker
Upon consideration of the suggestion of the Solicitor General and an examination of all of the papers submitted, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Long v. O'Fallon

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
60 U.S. 116
Long v. O'Fallon

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Letter from Anne Warren Weston to Deborah Weston, 1837

* related portals: Letters.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
38, Boylston St.
Monday nearly 4.
Dear Debora,
In great haste I write, for Abby Begood has only just gone from hence. She came just after dinner & has only just gone. She is looking well & is coming here on Wednesday morning next to get you if possible, to go over to Charlestown & pass the day with her. Elizabeth Doubleday is going to be there. Miss D, Abby says has called here but it was while the house was shut up. I told Abby I could not answer for you. The invited are to come, but I told her I thought I should go to Commencement. We had no scholars at all, but one little girl who came to say she was was going out of town for a week or two but should come when she came back. Maryanne called here this morning. Her father is busy looking up a school for her. She seemed a stronger abolitionist than ever. Mary Lincoln is coming here to board. I could not help blowing one blast against her, but I don't mean to open my mouth again. Mary Procter is here & I am all pulled back about routing her, at least for the present, as she has just lost a good place to come back here. Caroline had a letter from Sarah Ann the other day in which she says Mrs B is not materially better. Her mother is tho' very much as might be expected with Mrs B gone. Maria is going to ride out to Brookline to see the Grimkés next Thursday. May comes in town on Wed. Little Henry seems as good as pie. Mrs Park is gone, went last night. Women have got on quite well I believe. We went to meeting with C all day Sunday & we design to take him to the Monthly Concert this evening. John Coffin is out of town. W appears very docile & I hope for the best. The Grimkés are going to Concord to lecture & from there back to Groton ​& then up to Ashburn Lane. Maria approves my pastoral letter & I shall call a Board meeting on Wednesday next or another Thursday. Strengthen if possible, Aunt Priscilla to come in town. There never could be so good a time. Tell her no one is here & we would make her as cosy as could be. She could sleep with me & all would go on briskly.
There is no need of Lucia & Emma's coming immediately. Has Emma had the hooping cough? It is about now & Caroline wants E in formed of the same & see if she must be kept out of the way. Caroline says that E. Sampson is not at Cambridge. Garrison has come in town. Mary Ann has just come in she is going out to Cambridge to pass the week. Annie Hunter has got more than 200 names in Kingham. Give my love to all the folks. Boston does seem rather pleasant.
Ever yours
Anne.
* Mrs Debora Weston
* Weymouth
* Mrs Lifield
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Letter from Alexander Henry Haliday to Hermann Loew February 9, 1862

Paris, Hotel de I'Empire, February 9, 1862)
I left London with my friends on Tuesday morning, reached Amiens that evening, spent the next day with Dr. Dours and reached Paris by 11 p.m. The next day I called on Dr. Sichel , then of course to the Museum.The next day at Dr. Sichel's (Hymenoptera), Saturday again at the Museum. In the parts of Meigen's collection to which I confined my attention (Muscidae Acalypt.)the species represented are few beyond all my previous suppositions. It is evident that he derived more from v. Winthem's and Wiedemann's collections than from his own ; or that the duplicates of which his heirs disposed to Mr.Winnertz included a material part of the whole. Yet even the little remaining I found to take much time to muster and survey ; the more so from their imperfect condition. I first went through Helomyza-Heteromyza with your tables ; then Ephydra and Hydrellia hastily. The results I have copied out for you (vide postscript), expecting to set out to-morrow.At present, however, the aspect of the weather, snow and frost . . . induces us to pause for one or for two days, before we prepare to encounter Mont Cenis . I shall therefore, I expect, have one more morning at the Museum. ... I have not had a sight of Mr. Bigot till this afternoon. Bigot has got from Corsica the most remarkable Nemocerous Dipteron I have ever seen." [the Blepharocerid Apistomyia Bigot, published in the same year]. I feel much obliged hy the effort you made, under the instant pressure of business, to write to me.I am glad to know the Discomyza arrived safe. Finding that the volume of Curtis's 'Farm Insects' might go more safely through my booksellers, I have entrusted it to them and hope it will reach you speedily. I shall receive with real gratification the present you propose for me of your ' South African Diptera.' ... I expect to find his [Bellardi's] collection of Piedmontese Diptera very interesting. . . . He has been collecting long enough to furnish a good provincial collection. There I must conclude. Ever yours sincerely,A.H.H
# Letter from Alexander Henry Haliday to John Curtis undated

* related authors: John Curtis.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
"I have enclosed for you
Clypeaster Dejean 1821 Cat. Coléopt., 129 [n.n.]; Berthold 1827, in Latreille, Fam. Nat. Thierr., 392.
cassidoides Mar. - lateralis Meg . - Orthoperus Ste.- Punctum Marsham- piceus Ste.- picatus Mar.- truncatus Ste.- nigrescens Ste.-Atomos K
# Letter from Anne Warren Weston to Deborah Weston

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Letter from Anne Warren Weston to Deborah Weston."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Letter from Anne Warren Weston to Deborah Weston, 1837
* Letter from Anne Warren Weston to Deborah Weston, May 1, 1838
* Letter from Anne Warren Weston to Deborah Weston, July 30, 1838
# Letter from Terry Henry to CCR, regarding suicides, (2006-06-10)

* related portals: Guantanamo.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Wikified from page 22 of http://law.shu.edu/news/guantanamo_report_june_suicides_8_21_06.pdf on October 17th 2007
| From: | Terry.Henry@usdoj.gov |
| Date: | Sat, 10 Jun 2006 16:28:19 |
| To: | bjo@ccr-ny.org |
| Cc: | jmason@paulweiss.com, jeffdavis@mvalaw.com, ggutierrez@ccr-ny.org |
| Subject: | GTMO |
Barbara,
Would you be so kind to post the following on yuor listserv for habeas counsel or otherwise forward the following to habeas counsel? I have also cc'd (sic) two counsel who have sent separate inquiries to us. Thanks.
The Department of Defense issued a press release earlier today explaining that three Guantanamo detainees in Camp 1 died last night as a result of apparent suicide. This is to inform you that only one of the three detains was identified as possibly being a habeas petitioner, but counsel in that case informed us previously that the identification was not correct and he did not represent the detainee, even though the detainee's name closely matches the name in the petition he filed as counsel. The military commission proceedings scheduled to begin next week will be postponed until further notice.
Sincerely,
Terry Henry
# Letter from Sir Thomas Rainsborough to Henry Washington Governor of Worcester

This was a reply by Sir Thomas Rainsborough to Henry Washington Governor of Worcester who had requested that a delegation should go to Thomas Fairfax to request that Sir William Russell should not be exempted from the "Articles of agreement for the surrender of the garrison of Worcester"
Sir,
I shall no ways remit any civility to you, but can by no means admit the gentlemen to go the general [Thomas Fairfax] with your message desired; yet, if you please to send them, or any other persons, to see the general sign the articles accepted by you they shall receive such safe conduct. In the meantime I shall, in the presence of whom you shall appoint, sign the articles myself with engagement for the general's confirmation thereof; and I do (together with such hostages as you please to send me) eitpect the like from you, and for that you desire a pass for Colonel Bridges and Colonel'Kay.
I remain, your humble servant,
Thos. Rainsborough.
# Letter from Terry Henry to Barbara, regarding suicide, (2006 mid June)

* related portals: Guantanamo.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Wikified from page 23 of http://law.shu.edu/news/guantanamo_report_june_suicides_8_21_06.pdf on October 17th 2007
Subject: GTMO Suicides
Dear Barbara:
My previous e-mail to you over the weekend informed you, based on information supplied to me, that only one of the three detainees who died as a result of apparent suicide this weekend was a possible habeas petitioner. In fact, two of the detainees were associated with habeas cases. The two detainees are:
(1) Mani Shaman Turki al-Harbardi Al-Utaybi (ISN 588), case: Al Harbi v. Bush, 05-CV-1857. This is the Saudi individual referred to in my prior e-mail to you with respect to whom counsel had informed us previously that the identification was not correct and he (Mr. Daly) did not represent the detainee. We previously identified this detainee as petitiioner (sic) because the detainee's name closely matches the name in the filings by counsel ("Mane Shaman Al-Habardi");
(2) Saleh Ali Abdullah Al Salami, (ISN 693) case: Al Salami v. Bush, 05-CV-2452. This individual is of Yemeni nationality.
I sincerely regret the inadvertent error contained in my prior e-mail to you. We will be filing later today notices informing the court of these regrettable deaths. Also I am cc'ing (sic) counsel for the two detainees on this e-mail. Again, my regrets for the prior erroneous information. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Terry M. Henry
Senior Trial Counsel
Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
U.S. Department of Justice
Tel. 202.514.4107
# Kothe v. R. C. Taylor Trust

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
280 U.S. 224
Kothe v. R. C. Taylor Trust
Argued: Dec. 4, 1929. --- Decided: Jan 6, 1930
Mr. Frank H. Pardee, of Boston, Mass., for petitioner.
Messrs. George S. Taft and Thomas Hovey Gage, both of Worcester, Mass., for respondent.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Commissioners for Port of New Orleans

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
330 U.S. 552
Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Commissioners for Port of New Orleans
Argued: Feb. 5, 6, 1947. --- Decided: March 31, 1947
See 331 U.S. 864, 67 S.Ct. 1196.
Messrs. Charles A. O'Niell, Jr., and M. A. Grace, both of New Orleans, La., for appellants.
Mr. Arthur A. Moreno, of New Orleans, La., for appellees.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kotteakos v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
328 U.S. 750
Kotteakos v. United States
Argued: Feb. 28, 1946. --- Decided: June 10, 1946
Mr. Henry G. Singer, of Brooklyn, N.Y., for petitioners.
Mr. W. Marvin Smith, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from page 751 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice RUTLEDGE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kouba v. Allstate Insurance Co.

* related portals: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
* 691 F.2d 873
* LOLA KOUBA, a/k/a LOLA HOGAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff in Intervention-Appellee,
* v.
* ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant
* No. 81-4536, 81-4566
* United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
* May 14, 1982, Argued and Submitted
* October 29, 1982, Decided
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Lawrence W. Karlton, District Judge, Presiding.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Kalvin M. Grove, Esq., Fox & Grove, Chicago, Illinois, for Allstate Ins. Co.
Jella M. Fink, EEOC, Washington, District of Columbia, Judith E. Kurtz, San Francisco, California, for EEOC & Kouba.
Merrill, Choy and Hug, Circuit Judges.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Koster v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
330 U.S. 518
Koster v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company
Argued: Dec. 19, 1946. --- Decided: March 10, 1947
Mr. Julius Levy, of New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Stuart N. Updike, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice JACKSON, delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Louisiana National Bank v. Whitney Board of Liquidation of the City Debt

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
121 U.S. 284
Louisiana National Bank v. Whitney Board of Liquidation of the City Debt
Thos. J. Semmes and A. Goldthwaite, for the motion.
H. C. Miller, in opposition.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Louisiana National Bank v. Whitney Board of Liquidation of the City Debt/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
121 U.S. 284
Louisiana National Bank v. Whitney Board of Liquidation of the City Debt
This is a proceeding begun May 22, 1883, by Mrs. Myra Clark Gaines, then in life, to subject a certain sum of $40,000 on deposit in the Louisiana National Ban to the payment of a judgment in her favor against the city of New Orleans. There is no dispute about the fact that the money in question was on deposit when the proceeding was begun and the bank served with process, but the Board of Liquidation of the City Debt has made claim to it as part of the fund appropriated by act No. 133 of 1880 to the payment and liquidation of the bonded debt of the city. Pending the determination of the questions involved, the court, March 15, 1886, ordered the money paid into the registry of the court. From this order the bank has appealed, and also sued out a writ of error, and the board of liquidation has likewise appealed. The representatives of Mrs. Gaines, who were made parties to the proceeding after her death, now move to dismiss both the writ of error and the appeals, because the order to be brought under review is not a final judgment or decree within the meaning of that term as used in the acts of congress giving this court jurisdiction on appeals and writs of error.
We have no hesitation in granting the motion. The court has not adjudicated the rights of the parties concerned. It has only ordered the fund into the registry of the court for preservation during the pendency of the litigation as to its ownership. Such an order, it has always been held, is interlocutory only, and not a final decree. Forgay v. Conrad, 6 How. 204; Grant v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 106 U.S. 431, 1 Sup. Ct. Rep. 414. If in the end it shall be found that the fund belongs to the board of liquidation, it can be paid from the registry accordingly, notwithstanding the order that has been made. The money, when paid into the registry, will be in the hands of the court for the benefit of whomsoever it shall in the end be found to belong.
Both the appeals and the writ of error are dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Louisiana Power & Light Company v. City of Thibodaux/Concurrence Stewart

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Stewart
* Dissenting Opinion Brennan
United States Supreme Court
360 U.S. 25
Louisiana Power & Light Company v. City of Thibodaux
Argued: April 2, 1959. --- Decided: June 8, 1959
Mr. Justice STEWART, concurring.
In a conscientious effort to do justice the District Court deferred immediate adjudication of this controversy pending authoritative clarification of a controlling state statute of highly doubtful meaning. Under the circumstances presented, I think the course pursued was clearly within the District Court's allowable discretion. For that reason I concur in the judgment.
This case is totally unlike County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co., 360 U.S. 185, 79 S.Ct. 1060, except for the coincidence that both cases involve eminent domain proceedings. In Mashuda the Court holds that it was error for the District Court to dismiss the complaint. The Court further holds in that case that, since the controlling state law is clear and only factual issues need be resolved, there is no occasion in the interest of justice to refrain from prompt adjudication.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN, with whom The CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice DOUGLAS join, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse