OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Mrs. Wiggs of the Cabbage Patch

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons gallery, Commons category, Wikidata item.
The book was highly popular on its release, and has been adapted to a play and to several films. Warning: template has been deprecated.
MRS. WIGGS OF THE
CABBAGE PATCH
BY
ALICE CALDWELL HEGAN
PUBLISHED BY THE CENTURY CO.
NEW YORK .. MCMIII
Copyright, 1901, by The Century Co.
Printed July, October, November, and Decem-
ber, 1901, January (twice), February (twice),
March, April, June, July (twice), August
(twice), September, October, November, Decem-
ber (twice). 1902, January. February(twice), March
(twice), April, August, September (twice), 1903.
THE DEVINNE PRESS.
THIS LITTLE STORY IS
LOVINGLY DEDICATED
TO MY MOTHER, WHO
FOR YEARS HAS BEEN
THE GOOD ANGEL OF
"THE CABBAGE PATCH"
CONTENTS
* chapterpage
* iMrs. Wiggs's Philosophy3
* iiWays and Means16
* iiiThe "Christmas Lady"31
* ivThe Annexation of Cuby45
* vA Reminiscence54
* viA Theater Party67
* vii"Mr. Bob"84
* viiiMrs. Wiggs at Home98
* ixHow Spring came to the Cabbage Patch112
* xAustralia's Mishap128
* xiThe Benefit Dance139
MRS. WIGGS OF THE CABBAGE PATCH
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1942, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 81 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Names V

(1885)
* Vaizey, John Robert
* Vaizey, John Savill
* Valdez, Pedro d'Alcantara Fravassos
* Vale, Martindale Edwin
* Vale, William Mountford Kinsey
* Valentine, William Christopher
* Vallings, Frederick Ross
* Valpy, Robert Arthur
* Vane, Henry de Vere
* Vane, Henry Morgan
* Vansittart, Henry
* Vaudagne, Emile
* Vaughan, Gerald Osmond
* Vaughan, Harry Cleveland
* Vaughan, Henry Halford
* Vaughan, James
* Vaughan, Jonas Daniel
* Vawdrey, Daniel
* Velge, Charles Eugene
* Vels, Henry Bernard Isaac
* Venables, George Stovin
* Venables, Rowland George
* Chella Vencatanarasiah
* (Venkatachelliah), Akilandaiya (Cumbhumpati)
* (Venkatachelliah), Meenacshaya (Cumbhumpati)
* (Venkatachelliah), Sabapathi lyah (Cumbhumpati)
* Vennell, George Alexander
* Venning, William Marshall
* Verey, Henry William
* Verity, Richard Henry Manners
* Verney, Frederick William
* Vernon, George Frederic
* Verrall, Arthur Woollgar
* Vertue, Charles Erskine
* Vicajee, Framjee Rustamjee
* Vickers, Edward
* Vickers, Henry George
* Vickers, James Muschamp
* Vidal, George William
* Stonhouse-Vigor, Alfred Henry
* Villiers, Rt. Hon. Charles Pelham
* Villiers, Hon. Edward Reginald Clement
* De Villiers, Sir John Henry
* Vincent, Charles Edward Howard
* Vincent, James Edmund
* Vincent, John
* Vincent, Spencer
* Vintcent, Joseph
* Vipan, Frederick John
* Vivian, Charles Edwards Ennis
* Vivian, Hon. Claud Hamilton
* Vivian, John Henry Brougham
* De Vos, Frederick Henry
* Vredenburgh, Watson
* De Vries, Klaas Fritzes
* Vye, Nathaniel
# Men-at-the-Bar/Names U

(1885)
* Udal, John Symonds
* Udall, Thomas Bertram
* Ullah, Habib (Syed Mohamed)
* Underdown, Emanuel Maguire
* Underhay, Samuel Sydney
* Underhill, Arthur
* Underhill, Joseph
* Underwood, Thomas Neilson
* Upjohn, William Henry
* Uppleby, George Charles
* Upton, Charles William
* Urlin, Richard Denny
* Urmson, George Harold
* Urquhart, Walter Charles
# Men-at-the-Bar/Napier, Hon. Mark Francis

​Napier, Hon. Mark Francis, B.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1874, a member of the South-eastern circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 30 Jan., 1873 (then aged 21), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1876 (4th son of Francis, Lord Napier and Ettrick, K.T.); born 21 Jan., 1852; married 30 May, 1878, Miss Emily Jones, youngest dau. of Thomas, 7th Viscount Ranelagh, and has issue (see Foster's Peerage).
    Mulgrave House, Fulham; 6, Fig Tree Court, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Napier, Thomas Bateman

​Napier, Thomas Bateman, LL.D. London Univ. 1883, 1st class honours common law and equity, etc. (LL.B.), 1881, and a member of Convocation, Incorporated Law Society's first prizeman and scholar 1876, conveyancing gold medallist, is a law tutor, hon. secretary Law Students' Debating Society 1879, author of Leading Decisions and Prmcipal Statutes 1881, 1882, 1883, and 1884, of concise practice of the Queen's bench and chancery divisions, a student of the Inner Temple 7 Nov., 1879 (then aged 25), first senior studentship in Roman law and jurisprudence Hilary, 1882, certificate of honour Trin., 1882, called to the bar 17 Nov., 1883 (eldest son of late Richard Clay Napier, of Knutsford, Cheshire); born 11 July, 1854.
    6, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.; 2, New Court, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Names Q

(1885)
* Quick, Frederick James
* Quicke, Arthur Philip
* Quilter, Harry
* Quin, Richard James
# Men-at-the-Bar/Names Y

(1885)
* Yale, John Edward Ivor
* Yale, William Corbet
* Yarde, Walter Broad Stocker
* Yardley, Edward
* Yardley, Robert Blake
* Yardley, William
* Yates, Arthur
* Yates, James Stuart
* Yates, John Lowndes
* Yates, Joseph Maghull
* Yates, Joseph St. John
* Yates, Walter Baldwyn
* Yates, William
* Yates, William Flood
* Yatman, William Hamilton
* Yearsley, James Fletcher
* Yeates, John
* Yeatman, John Pym
* Yelverton, Roger Yelverton Dawson
* Yeoman, Thomas Lawrence
* Yerburgh, Robert Armstrong
* Yool, George Valentine
* Yoshiyama, Goronoske
* Young, Alexander
* Young, Alfred
* Young, Aretas William Charles
* Young, Charles Edward Baring
* Young, Sir Charles Lawrence, Bart.
* Young, Francis
* Young, Rt. Hon. George
* Young, Sir George, Bart.
* Young, Gerald Henry Baird
* Young, Goodwin
* Young, Henry Robert
* Young, Rev. Henry Saville
* Young, Herbert
* Young, Hugo Joseph
* Young, John Kirkpatrick
* Young, Murdo
* Young, William
* Young, William Eaton
* Younger, Robert
* Younghusband, Romer Edward
# Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
378 U.S. 52
Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
Argued: March 5, 1964. --- Decided: June 15, 1964
Harold Krieger, New York City, for petitioners.
William P. Sirignano, New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice GOLDBERG delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Murray's v. Baker/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
This is an action of ejectment. The defence set up is the act of limitations of the state of Georgia. The only question which the case presents is, whether the plaintiff, who resided in Virginia, comes within the exception in the act in favour of persons 'beyond seas.'
On this question, the court are unanimously of opinion, that to give a sensible construction to that act, the words 'beyond seas' must be held to he equivalent to 'without the limits of the state,' and order this opinion to be certified to the circuit court of the district of Georgia.
Certificate for the plaintiff.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Murray v. City of Pocatello

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
226 U.S. 318
Murray v. City of Pocatello
Argued: December 3 and 4, 1912. --- Decided: December 16, 1912
Messrs. William V. Hodges, Gerald Hughes, Clayton C. Dorsey, A. A. Hoehling, Jr., and N. M. Ruick for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 318-322 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. D. Worth Clark, Jesse R. S. Budge, Aldis B. Browne, Alexander Britton, and Evans Browne for defendant in error.
Memorandum opinion by direction of the court. By Mr. Justice Holmes:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Murray v. Charleston/Dissent Miller

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Miller
United States Supreme Court
96 U.S. 432
Murray v. Charleston
MR. JUSTICE MILLER, with whom concurred MR. JUSTICE HUNT, dissenting.
I am of opinion that the power of taxation found in the charter of the city of Charleston, long before the contract was made which is here sued on, entered, like all other laws, into the contract, and became a part of it. In other words, the contract was made subject to this power of taxation by the city of Charleston, as found in her charter from 1781 to the present time.
The imposition and collection of this tax cannot, therefore, impair the obligation of a contract which was made subject to her right to exercise that power. I therefore dissent.
NOTE.-In Jenkins v. Charleston, error to the Supreme Court of the State of South Carolina, which was argued by Mr. A. G. Magrath and Mr. James Lowndes for the plaintiff in error, and by the same counsel for the defendant in error as was the preceding case, MR. JUSTICE STRONG, in delivering the opinion of the court, remarked: This case is like Murray v. Charleston, and is governed by the decision there made.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of the State will be reversed, and the record remitted with instructions to proceed in accordance with this opinion; and it is
So ordered.
MR. JUSTICE MILLER and MR. JUSTICE HUNT dissented.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Ballad and Song/Volume 5/The Disappointment

* related portals: Erotica.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Layout 2
THE DISAPPOINTMENT
[c. 1697]
[By Mrs. Behn, Poems, 2nd ed., p. 70].
# National Ballad and Song/Volume 5/The Willing Mistress

* related portals: Erotica.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Layout 2
THE WILLING MISTRESS
[c. 1697]
[By Aphra Behn, Poems (1697), p. 44].
# National Bank Loan Company of Watertown v. Petrie

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
189 U.S. 423
National Bank Loan Company of Watertown v. Petrie
Argued: and submitted February 24, 1903. --- Decided: March 9, 1903
Messrs. Henry Purcell and John Lansing for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Elon R. Brown for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Bank of Athens v. Shackelford

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
239 U.S. 81
National Bank of Athens v. Shackelford
Argued: October 29, 1915. --- Decided: November 8, 1915
Messrs. John J. Strickland and Roy M. Strickland for appellant.
Messrs. Lamar C. Rucker, Horace M. Holden, Stephen C. Upson, and Howell C. Erwin for appellee.
Mr. Justice McReynolds delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Ballad and Song/Volume 5/The Old Woman's Wish

* related portals: Erotica.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Layout 2
THE OLD WOMAN’S WISH
[c. 1684]
[A Broadside Song; music in Pills to Purge Melancholy (1707), iii. 101].
# National Ballad and Song/Volume 5/Why do you Trifle

* related portals: Erotica.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Layout 2
“WHY DO YOU TRIFLE? FY UPON’T!”
[c. 1610–20]
[From Rawlinson MS., B 35, leaf 54, back].
# National Bank of Athens v. Shackelford/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
239 U.S. 81
National Bank of Athens v. Shackelford
Argued: October 29, 1915. --- Decided: November 8, 1915
This controversy arose in a bankruptcy proceeding, and was begun in the United States district court for the northern district of Georgia. Appellant claims that it holds a valid lien on certain real estate in the city of Athens, formerly the property of the bankrupt, Webb, under a mortgage deed executed by him November 6, 1911, but not recorded until non, August 14, 1912, a few hours before the petition in involuntary bankruptcy was filed. Among other things, the trustee asserts that the mortgage is void as to creditors because fraudulently withheld from record. Bankruptcy act, § 70. Georgia Code, 1910, § 3224.
Having heard the witnesses and upon the entire evidence, the district court, citing and purporting to follow Re Duggan, 106 C. C. A. 51, 183 Fed. 405 (1910), found and adjudged the deed invalid as against general creditors. Affirming this action, the circuit court of appeals for the fifth circuit declared: 'The evidence in this case tends strongly to show that, although the mortgage given by the bankrupt to the appellant was for a valid consideration and effective as between the parties thereto, the same by understanding, if not agreement, was withheld from record, so as not to affect the mortgagor's credit; and we therefore concur with the trial judge in his disposition of the case.' 125 C. C. A. 575, 576, 208 Fed. 677, 678. In the Duggan Case the same court had held fraudulent and void, both as to prior and subsequent creditors, a chattel mortgage executed by a bankrupt, but withheld from record under agreement so to do because of the effect which recordation would have on her credit.
Considering all said and adjudicated by the two courts below, we must conclude they concurred in finding, as matter of fact, that the mortgage in question was void as to creditors because executed and withheld from record for the purpose of hindering, delaying, or defrauding them. The rule is well settled that a finding of this nature will not be disturbed upon review here unless clearly shown to be erroneous. Washington Securities Co. v. United States, 234 U.S. 76, 78, 58 L. ed. 1220, 1222, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 725; Stuart v. Hayden, 169 U.S. 1, 14, 42 L. ed. 639, 643, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 274. An examination of the record reveals no clear error, and, accordingly the judgment appealed from must be affirmed.
Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 70, 30 Stat. 565 (Comp.St.1913, § 9654).

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mitchell v. Globe International Publishing, Inc. (1993)

Plaintiff Nellie Mitchell, 96, sued defendant Globe International Publishing, Inc., after the defendant's tabloid Sun published her photo above the headline, "World's oldest newspaper carrier, 101, quits because she's pregnant!" After the district court denied the publisher's motion for summary judgment, Mitchell v. Globe Int'l Pub'g, Inc., 773 F. Supp. 1235 (W.D. Ark. 1991), the case was tried to a jury.
The jury awarded compensatory damages of $650,000 and punitive damages of $850,000. The publisher then moved for a remittitur. In Peoples Bank & Trust Company of Mountain Home v. Globe International, Inc., 786 F. Supp. 791 (W.D. Ark. 1992), the district court denied the defendant's motion for remittitur. This denial was ultimately reversed on appeal. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Mountain Home v. Globe Int'l Pub'g, Inc., 978 F.2d 1065 (8th Cir. 1992).
The case was remanded for entry of a remittitur, and Mitchell v. Globe International Publishing, Inc., 817 F. Supp. 72 (W.D. Ark. 1993), is the district court's decision on remand.
U.S. District Court, Western District of Arkansas, Harrison Division
817 F. Supp. 72
NELLIE MITCHELL v. GLOBE INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING, INC., D/B/A "SUN"
No. Civ. 91-3001. --- Decided: Mar. 15, 1993.
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
Phillip H. McMath, McMath Law Firm, Little Rock, AR, Roy E. Danuser, Mountain Home, AR, for plaintiff.
Phillip S. Anderson, John E. Tull, Williams & Anderson, Little Rock, AR, for defendant.
[Memorandum opinion by Chief Judge HUGH FRANKLIN WATERS.]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mitchell v. Donovan/Dissent Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Black
* Dissenting Opinion Douglas
* Wikipedia article
United States Supreme Court
398 U.S. 427
Mitchell v. Donovan
Argued: April 21, 1970. --- Decided: June 15, 1970
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, dissenting.
I agree with the District Court that the case is too hypothetical to qualify as a 'case' or 'controversy' within the meaning of Article III and I would affirm. I do not, however, share the aversion to 28 U.S.C. § 1253 which the Court's opinion reflects. I would be hospitable to its aim and purpose as my dissent in Swift & Co. v. Wickham, 382 U.S. 111, 129, 86 S.Ct. 258, 15 L.Ed.2d 194, indicates. The declaratory judgment is, I think, 'an order granting or denying * * * an * * * injunction' within the meaning of § 1253.
Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144, 83 S.Ct. 554, 9 L.Ed.2d 644, is not to the contrary. It merely held that is some circumstances 'an action solely for declaratory relief' could be tried before a single judge where the 'relief sought and the order entered affected an Act of Congress in a totally noncoercive fashion.' Id., at 154, 155, 83 S.Ct. at 560. We indicated, however, that a different result would follow 'whenever the operation of a statutory scheme may be immediately disrupted before a final judicial determination of the validity of the trial court's order can be obtained.' Id., at 155, 83 S.Ct. at 560.
The Kennedy case, in other words, involved solely the question whether a three-judge court need always be summoned where no injunctive relief was asked or contemplated. The answer involved an analysis of 28 U.S.C. § 2281 and § 2282. We are now concerned with s 1253 and the meaning of 'an order granting or denying * * * an * * * injunction.' The declaratory judgment may well contain a 'thou shalt not' as commanding as any injunction. Or its refusal may be as definitive an adjudication as the refusal of an injunction. Ordinarily a declaratory judgment will result in precisely the same interference with and disruption of state proceedings that the long-standing policy limiting injunctions was designed to avoid.
Where, as here, the three-judge court was properly convened, I would think that any action it took, which was denying or granting an injunction or its equivalent, would be properly here under 28 U.S.C. § 1253.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mitchell v. Furman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
180 U.S. 402
Mitchell v. Furman
Argued: March, 1, 2, 1900. --- Decided: for Reargument March 26, 1900

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mitchell v. First National Bank of Chicago

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
180 U.S. 471
Mitchell v. First National Bank of Chicago
Argued: October 11, 12, 1900. --- Decided: for reargument October 29, 1900
Messrs. T. M. Maltbie and C. E. Mitchell for petitioner.
Messrs. Percy S. Bryant and Wm. C. Case for respondent.
Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mitchell v. Globe International Publishing, Inc.

Plaintiff Nellie Mitchell, 96, sued defendant Globe International Publishing, Inc., after the defendant's tabloid Sun published her photo above the headline, "World's oldest newspaper carrier, 101, quits because she's pregnant!" The publisher moved for summary judgment. In Mitchell v. Globe International Publishing, Inc., 773 F. Supp. 1235 (W.D. Ark. 1991), the district court denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment.
Subsequent history. The jury awarded compensatory damages of $650,000 and punitive damages of $850,000. The publisher then moved for a remittitur. In Peoples Bank & Trust Company of Mountain Home v. Globe International, Inc., 786 F. Supp. 791 (W.D. Ark. 1992), the district court denied the defendant's motion for remittitur. This denial was ultimately reversed on appeal. Peoples Bank & Tr. Co. of Mountain Home v. Globe Int'l Pub'g, Inc., 978 F.2d 1065 (8th Cir. 1992), on remand sub nom. Mitchell v. Globe Int'l Pub'g, Inc., 817 F. Supp. 72 (W.D. Ark. 1993).
U.S. District Court, Western District of Arkansas, Harrison Division
773 F. Supp. 1235
Nellie MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. GLOBE INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING, INC. d/b/a "Sun", Defendant.
No. Civ. 91-3001. --- Delivered: Sept. 4, 1991.
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
Phillip H. McMath, McMath Law Firm, Little Rock, Ark., Roy E. Danuser, Mountain Home, Ark., for plaintiff.
Philip S. Anderson, Williams & Anderson, Little Rock, Ark., for defendant.
[Memorandum opinion by Chief Judge H. FRANKLIN WATERS.]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Myths and Legends of British North America/Calendar (Thompson River)

CALENDAR
Thompson River
First month.—People-hunt-deer moon.
Second month.—"Going-in" moon. People go into their winter houses.
Third month.—Last "going-in" moon. Last of the people go into winter houses.
Fourth month.—"Little-coming-out" moon. Alternate cold and rain. Some people camp in lodges for a time.
Fifth month.—"Going-in-again" moon. Last cold when people go into winter houses again.
Sixth month.—"Coming-out" moon. Winter houses left for good. People catch fish in bag nets.
Seventh month.—People-go-on-short-hunts moon.
Eighth month.—People-pick-berries moon.
Ninth month.—People-begin-to-fish-for-salmon moon.
Tenth month.—People-fish-for-and-cure-salmon moon.
Eleventh month.—"To boil food a little." So called because people prepare fish oil.
Autumn.—People hunt large game and go trapping.
# Myths and Legends of British North America/Chipmunk (Thompson River)

CHIPMUNK
Thompson River
ONE day, as Grizzly Bear came along the trail, Chipmunk called her names and mocked her. Grizzly Bear rushed at Chipmunk. Chipmunk ran under a log. Grizzly Bear rushed at her again. Chipmunk did the same thing. Grizzly Bear shouted, "I'll get you!" and the fourth time almost caught her. Her claws scratched Chipmunk's back. Therefore the chipmunk has stripes on his back even today, because Grizzly scratched her in that way.
Later, Marmot met Grizzly Bear. He teased her in the same way that Chipmunk had, and the very fourth time that Grizzly rushed at him, she almost caught him, and scratched him, too. So Marmot also has stripes, even today.
From "Memoirs, American Museum of Natural History"
Indian Defensive Armor The first two designs are body armor, the third a shield
# Myths and Legends of British North America/Calendar (Cree)

CALENDAR
Cree
May.—Frog moon.
June.—Moon in which birds begin to lay eggs.
July.—Moon in which birds cast their feathers.
August.—Moon when the young birds fly.
September.—Moon when the deer cast their horns.
October.—Rutting moon.
November.—Hoar-frost moon.
December.—Ice moon.
January.—Whirlwind moon; or, extremely cold moon.
February.—Big moon.
March.—Eagle moon.
April.—Goose moon.