OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography/Gross, John Daniel

Edition of 1892.
​GROSS, John Daniel, clergyman, b. in Germany in 1737; d. in Canajoharie, N. Y., 25 May, 1812. During the Revolution he was exposed to many perils as pastor of a church on the frontier. At its close he removed to New York city. He was professor of German in Columbia in 1784-'95, and professor of moral philosophy in 1787-'95. He was a regent of the University of New York in 1784, and a trustee of Columbia in 1787. He became wealthy by buying soldiers' land-warrants. The last ten years of his life were spent on a farm. The degree of S. T. D. was conferred on him by Columbia in 1789. He published “Natural Principles of Rectitude” (New York, 1795).
# Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography/Grinnell, Josiah Bushnell

​GRINNELL, Josiah Bushnell, congressman, b. in New Haven, Vt., 22 Dec., 1821. He was graduated at Oneida institute in 1843 and at Auburn theological seminary in 1847, entered the ministry of the Presbyterian church, and preached seven years in Union Village, N. Y., Washington, D. C., and New York city. He founded the Congregational church at Grinnell, Iowa, in 1854, and preached there gratuitously for several years, but afterward retired from the ministry and became an extensive wool-grower. He was a member of the state senate in 1856-’60, special agent of the post-office department in 1861-’3, and in 1863-’7 was a representative in congress, having been elected as a Republican. He was a special agent of the treasury department in 1868, and in 1884 was appointed commissioner of the U. S. bureau of animal industries. When in the Iowa senate Mr. Grinnell took an active part in the formation of the state free-school system, and was also the correspondent and confidant of John Brown, entertaining him and his company. “In my library,” says Mr. Grinnell in a recent letter, “secretly, in the gleam of bayonets, and near a miniature arsenal for the ​protection of a score of ex-slaves, he wrote a part of his Virginia proclamation.” Mr. Grinnell was active in aiding the escape of fugitive slaves, and at one time a reward was offered for his head. He has been connected with the building of six railroads, and has laid out five towns, including that of Grinnell, Iowa, which was named for him. He gave the proceeds of the sale of building-lots in that town to Grinnell university, now merged in Iowa college, and was for some time its president. He has published “Home of the Badgers” (Milwaukee, Wis., 1845); “Cattle Industries of the United States” (New York, 1884); and numerous pamphlets and addresses.
# Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography/Green, Francis

Edition of 1900.
​GREEN, Francis, merchant, b. in Boston, 1 Sept., 1743; d. in Medford, Mass., 31 April, 1809. His father, Benjamin, was president of the council and commander-in-chief of Nova Scotia. Francis was graduated at Harvard in 1760; joined the array as an ensign after the beginning of the French war, was present at the siege of Louisburg in 1758, at that of Martinique, and in 1763 at the capture of Havana. In 1765 he went to England, and on his return sold his commission and settled in business in Boston. At the beginning of the Revolution, although he declared that he was the friend of liberty, he adhered to the crown. In 1776 he went to Halifax, where he was appointed a magistrate, returned to New York in 1777, and the next year was proscribed and banished. He remained in England till 1784, when he returned to Nova Scotia, and was sheriff of the county of Halifax and senior judge of the court of common pleas. He returned to Massachusetts in 1797, and settled in Medford. He published "The Art of Impairing Speech" (London, 1783). and a translation of the "Letters of Abbé de l'Epée" (Boston, 1803).
# Bofinger v. Tuyes

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
120 U.S. 198
Bofinger v. Tuyes
O. B. Sansum, for plaintiffs in error.
R. H. Browne, C. B. Singleton, and Chas. E. Schmidt, for defendants in error.
MATTHEWS, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bogard v. Sweet

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
209 U.S. 464
Bogard v. Sweet
Argued: March 6, 1908. --- Decided: April 27, 1908
Messrs. John W. Shartel, James R. Keaton, and Frank Wells for appellants.
Mr. Charles M. Thacker for appellees.
Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bogardus v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Bogardus v. Commissioner, 302 U.S. 34 (1937), was a case before the U.S. Supreme Court discussing, under United States tax law, how to distinguish compensation from tax-exempt gifts under §102(a).Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Brandeis
United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 34
Bogardus v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Argued: Oct. 18, 1937. --- Decided: Nov 8, 1937
Mr. Wm. D. Whitney, of New York City, for petitioner.
Homer S.C.ummings, Attorney General, and Mr. A. F. Prescott, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bogardus v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue/Dissent Brandeis

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Brandeis
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS, Mr. Justice STONE, Mr. Justice CARDOZO, and Mr. Justice BLACK (dissenting).
A payment received as compensation for services is taxable as income, though made without consideration, and hence for many purposes a gift. Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 279 U.S. 716, 730, 49 S.Ct. 499, 504, 73 L.Ed. 918. To hold, as the prevailing opinion seems to do, that every payment which in any aspect is a gift is perforce not compensation and hence relieved of any tax, is to work havoc with the law. A large body of decisions, whose provenance is Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner, would be annulled by such a test. See e.g. Weagant v. Bowers (C.C.A.) 57 F.(2d) 679; Fisher v. Commissioner (C.C.A.) 59 F. (2d) 192; Bass v. Hawley (C.C.A.) 62 F.(2d) 721; United States v. McCormick (C.C.A.) 67 F.(2d) 867; Botchford v. Commissioner (C.C.A.) 81 F.(2d) 914, 110 A.L.R. 281; Schumacher v. United States (Ct.Cl.) 55 F.(2d) 1007. Cf. Lucas v. Ox Fibre Brush Co., 281 U.S. 115, 50 S.Ct. 273, 74 L.Ed. 733. Their teaching makes it plain that the categories of 'gift' and 'compensation' are not always mutually exclusive, but at times can overlap. What controls is not the presence or absence of consideration. What controls is the intention with which payment, however voluntary, has been made. Has it been made with the intention that services rendered in the past shall be requited more completely, though full acquittance has been given? If so, it bears a tax. Has it been made to show good will, esteem, or kindliness toward persons who happen to have served, but who are paid without thought to make requital for the service? If so, it is exempt.
We think there was a question of fact whether payment to this petitioner was made with one intention or the other. A finding either in his favor or against him would have had a fair basis in the evidence. It was for the triers of the facts to seek among competing aims or motives the ones that dominated conduct. Perhaps, if such a function had been ours, we would have drawn the inference favoring a gift. That is not enough. If there was opportunity for opposing inferences, the judgment of the Board controls. Elmhurst Cemetery Co. v. Commissioner, 300 U.S. 37, 57 S.Ct. 324, 81 L.Ed. 491; Helvering v. Tex-Penn Oil Co., 300 U.S. 481, 57 S.Ct. 569, 81 L.Ed. 755.
# Book of Common Prayer (ECUSA)/Proper Liturgies for Special Days/Holy Saturday

​Holy Saturday
There is no celebration of the Eucharist on this day.
When there is a Liturgy of the Word, the Celebrant begins with the Collect of the Day
O God, Creator of heaven and earth: Grant that, as the crucified body of your dear Son was laid in the tomb and rested on this holy Sabbath, so we may await with him the coming of the third day, and rise with him to newness of life; who now lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.
Old TestamentJob 14:1‑14
Psalm 130,or 31:1‑5
Epistle1 Peter 4:1‑8
GospelMatthew 27:57‑66,or John 19:38‑42
After the Gospel (and homily), in place of the Prayers of the People, the Anthem “In the midst of life” (page 484 or 492) is sung or said.
The service then concludes with the Lord’s Prayer and the Grace.
# Book of Common Prayer (ECUSA)/Tables for Finding Holy Days/A Table to Find Easter Day

​A Table to Find Easter Day
| ​ Golden Number Year Easter Day Year Easter Day Year Easter Day 01 1900 April 15 1938 April 17 1976* April 18 02 1901 April 7 1939 April 9 1977 April 10 03 1902 March 30 1940* March 24 1978 March 25 04 1903 April 12 1941 April 13 1979 April 15 05 1904* April 3 1942 April 5 1980* April 5 06 1905 April 23 1943 April 25 1981 April 19 07 1906 April 15 1944* April 9 1982 April 11 08 1907 Marrh 31 1945 April 1 1983 April 3 09 1908* April 19 1945 April 21 1984* April 22 10 1909 April 11 1947 April 5 1985 April 7 11 1910 March 27 1948* March 28 1985 March 30 12 1911 April 15 1949 April 17 1987 April 19 13 1912* April 7 1950 April 9 1988* April 3 14 1913 March 23 1951 March 25 1989 March 25 15 1914 April 12 1952* April 13 1990 April 15 16 1915 April 4 1953 April 5 1991 March 31 17 1915* April 23 1954 April 18 1992* April 19 18 1917 April 8 1955 April 10 1993 April 11 19 1918 March 31 1955* April 1 1994 April 3 01 1919 April 20 1957 April 21 1995 April 15 02 1920* April 4 1958 April 5 1995* April 7 03 1921 March 27 1959 March 29 1997 March 30 04 1922 April 15 1950* April 17 1998 April 12 05 1923 April 1 1951 April 2 1999 April 4 06 1924* April 20 1952 April 22 2000* April 23 07 1925 April 12 1953 April 14 2001 April 15 08 1925 April 4 1954* March 29 2002 March 31 09 1927 April 17 1955 April 18 2003 April 20 10 1928* April 8 1955 April 10 2004* April 11 11 1929 March 31 1957 March 25 2005 March 27 12 1930 April 20 1958* April 14 2005 April 15 13 1931 April 5 1959 April 5 2007 April 8 14 1932* March 27 1970 March 29 2008* March 23 15 1933 April 15 1971 April 11 2009 April 12 16 1934 April 1 1972* April 2 2010 April 4 17 1935 April 21 1973 April 22 2011 April 24 18 1936* April 12 1974 April 14 2011* April 8 19 1937 March 28 1975 March 30 2013 March 31 | ​ Year Easter Day Year Easter Day 2014 April 20 2052* April 21 2015 April 5 2053 April 6 2016* March 27 2054 March 29 2017 April 16 2055 April 18 2018 April 1 2056* April 2 2019 April 21 2057 April 22 2020* April 12 2058 April 14 2021 April 4 2059 March 30 2022 April 17 2060* April 18 2023 April 9 2061 April 10 2024* March 31 2062 March 26 2025 April 20 2063 April 15 2026 April 5 2064* April 6 2027 March 28 2065 March 29 2028* April 16 2066 April 11 2029 April 1 2067 April 3 2030 April 21 2068* April 22 2031 April 13 2069 April 14 2032 March 28 2070 March 30 2033 April 17 2071 April 19 2034 April 9 2072* April 10 2035 March 25 2073 March 26 2036* April 13 2074 April 15 2037 April 5 2075 April 7 2038 April 25 2076* April 19 2039 April 10 2077 April 11 2040* April 1 2078 April 3 2041 April 21 2079 April 23 2042 April 6 2080* April 7 2043 March 29 2081 March 30 2044* April 17 2082 April 19 2045 April 9 2083 April 4 2046 March 25 2084* March 26 2047 April 14 2085 April 15 2048* April 5 2086 March 31 2049 April 18 2087 April 20 2050 April 10 2088 April 11 2051 April 2 2089 April 3 |
​* The years marked with an asterisk are Leap Years.
# Book of Common Prayer (ECUSA)/Proper Liturgies for Special Days

Proper Liturgies for Special Days
Ash Wednesday 264 Palm Sunday 270 Maundy Thursday 274 Good Friday 276 Holy Saturday 283 The Great Vigil of Easter 285
# Book of Common Prayer (ECUSA)/Tables for Finding Holy Days/A Table to Find Movable Feasts and Holy Days

​A Table to Find Movable Feasts and Holy Days
| Easter Day | Sundays after Epiphany | Ash Wednesday | Ascension Day | Pentecost | Numbered Proper of 2 Pentecost | Advent Sunday |
| March 22 | 4 | Feb. 4 | April 30 | May 10 | #3 | November 29 |
| March 23 | 4 | Feb. 5 | May 1 | May 11 | #3 | November 30 |
| March 24 | 4 | Feb. 6 | May 2 | May 12 | #3 | December 1 |
| March 25 | 5 | Feb. 7 | May 3 | May 13 | #3 | December 2 |
| March 26 | 5 | Feb. 8 | May 4 | May 14 | #3 | December 3 |
| March 27 | 5 | Feb. 9 | May 5 | May 15 | #4 | November 27 |
| March 28 | 5 | Feb. 10 | May 6 | May 16 | #4 | November 28 |
| March 29 | 5 | Feb. 11 | May 7 | May 17 | #4 | November 29 |
| March 30 | 5 | Feb. 12 | May 8 | May 18 | #4 | November 30 |
| March 31 | 5 | Feb. 13 | May 9 | May 19 | #4 | December 1 |
| April 1 | 6 | Feb. 14 | May 10 | May 20 | #4 | December 2 |
| April 2 | 6 | Feb. 15 | May 11 | May 21 | #4 | December 3 |
| April 3 | 6 | Feb. 16 | May 12 | May 22 | #5 | November 27 |
| April 4 | 6 | Feb. 17 | May 13 | May 23 | #5 | November 28 |
| April 5 | 6 | Feb. 18 | May 14 | May 24 | #5 | November 29 |
| April 6 | 6 | Feb. 19 | May 15 | May 25 | #5 | November 30 |
| April 7 | 6 | Feb. 20 | May 16 | May 26 | #5 | December 1 ​ |
| April 8 | 7 | Feb. 21 | May 17 | May 27 | #5 | December 2 |
| April 9 | 7 | Feb. 22 | May 18 | May 28 | #5 | December 3 |
| April 10 | 7 | Feb. 23 | May 19 | May 29 | #6 | November 27 |
| April 11 | 7 | Feb. 24 | May 20 | May 30 | #6 | November 28 |
| April 12 | 7 | Feb. 25 | May 21 | May 31 | #6 | November 29 |
| April 13 | 7 | Feb. 26 | May 22 | June 1 | #6 | November 30 |
| April 14 | 7 | Feb. 27 | May 23 | June 2 | #6 | December 1 |
| April 15 | 8 | Feb. 28 | May 24 | June 3 | #6 | December 2 |
| April 16 | 8 | March 1 | May 25 | June 4 | #6 | December 3 |
| April 17 | 8 | March 2 | May 26 | June 5 | #7 | November 27 |
| April 18 | 8 | March 3 | May 27 | June 6 | #7 | November 28 |
| April 19 | 8 | March 4 | May 28 | June 7 | #7 | November 29 |
| April 20 | 8 | March 5 | May 29 | June 8 | #7 | November 30 |
| April 21 | 8 | March 6 | May 30 | June 9 | #7 | December 1 |
| April 22 | 9 | March 7 | May 31 | June 10 | #7 | December 2 |
| April 23 | 9 | March 8 | June 1 | June 11 | #7 | December 3 |
| April 24 | 9 | March 9 | June 2 | June 12 | #8 | November 27 |
| April 25 | 9 | March 10 | June 3 | June 13 | #8 | November 28 |
* ↑ In Leap Years, the number of Sundays after the Epiphany will be the same as if Easter Day were one day later than in the above Table.
* ↑ In Leap Years, the date of Ash Wednesday will be one day later in the month of February than in the above Table.
* ↑ Indicates the numbered Proper to be used on the Sunday after Trinity Sunday. Subsequently, the Propers are used consecutively.
# Book of Common Prayer (ECUSA)/Proper Liturgies for Special Days/Maundy Thursday

​Maundy Thursday
The Eucharist begins in the usual manner, using the following Collect, Psalm, and Lessons
Almighty Father, whose dear Son, on the night before he suffered, instituted the Sacrament of his Body and Blood: Mercifully grant that we may receive it thankfully in remembrance of Jesus Christ our Lord, who in these holy mysteries gives us a pledge of eternal life; and who now lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.
Old TestamentExodus 12:1‑14a
Psalm78:14‑20, 23‑25
Epistle1 Corinthians 11:23‑26(27‑32)
GospelJohn 13:1‑15, or Luke 22:14‑30
When observed, the ceremony of the washing of feet appropriately follows the Gospel and homily.
During the ceremony, the following or other suitable anthems may be sung or said
The Lord Jesus, after he had supped with his disciples and had washed their feet, said to them, “Do you know what I, your Lord and Master, have done to you? I have given you an example, that you should do as I have done.”
​Peace is my last gift to you, my own peace I now leave with you; peace which the world cannot give, I give to you.
I give you a new commandment: Love one another as I have loved you.
Peace is my last gift to you, my own peace I now leave with you; peace which the world cannot give, I give to you.
By this shall the world know that you are my disciples: That you have love for one another.
The service continues with the Prayers of the People.
Where it is desired to administer Holy Communion from the reserved Sacrament on Good Friday, the Sacrament for that purpose is consecrated at this service.
Preface of Holy Week
# Book of Common Prayer (ECUSA)/Tables for Finding Holy Days

Tables for Finding Holy Days
Tables and Rules for Finding the Date of Easter Day 880 A Table to Find Easter Day 882 A Table to Find Movable Feasts and Holy Days 884
# Atlantic Trust Company v. Chapman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
208 U.S. 360
Atlantic Trust Company v. Chapman
Argued: January 15, 16, 1908. --- Decided: February 24, 1908
Messrs. Stanley W. Dexter and Edward B. Whitney for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 360-362 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Edgar C. Chapman in propria persona for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 362-364 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantio Railway Company v. Laird

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
164 U.S. 393
Atlantio Railway Company v. Laird
[Syllabus from pages 393-395 intentionally omitted]
A. T. Britton and A. B. Browne, for plaintiff in error.
George H. Smith, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice WHITE, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic and Pacific Railroad Company v. Hopkins

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
94 U.S. 11
Atlantic and Pacific Railroad Company v. Hopkins
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas.
On the 30th of November, 1872, Hopkins obtained, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas, a judgment against the St. Louis, Lawrence, and Denver Railroad Company for $6,385, with interest anc costs of suit. Upon this judgment two executions were issued, and returned unsatisfied.
The attorney for Hopkins filed in the clerk's office, June 19, 1873, his affidavits, setting forth that he had good reason to and did believe that the Pacific Railroad, and the Atlantic and Pacific Railroad Company, were indebted to the St. Louis, Lawrence, and Denver Railroad Company. Garnishee summons with interrogatories attached were thereupon issued. The companies answered, denying their indebtedness; but the court, on the 4th of December, 1873, having, upon consideration of said answers and the argument of counsel thereon, found that the sum of $7,500 would be due from the garnishees to the defendant on the first day of January then next ensuing, passed the following order:--
'It is, therefore, now by the court here considered, ordered, and adjudged that said garnishees, the Pacific Railroad and the Atlantic and Pacific Railroad Company aforesaid, as garnishees herein, pay into this court, to the clerk thereof, on the first day of January next, so much of said sum of $7,500 as it will require to pay and discharge the judgment heretofore, and on the thirtieth day of November, A.D. 1872, rendered herein in favor of said plaintiff against said defendant, that is, the sum of $6,385, with interest thereon at the rate of seven per cent per annum from the said thirtieth day of November, A.D. 1872, and the costs by said plaintiff in this action expended, and that execution issue therefor if they neglect to make such payment on that first day of January, A.D. 1873; and that on scuh payment being made herein to said clerk by said garnishees, or either of them, the said garnishees are to both stand and be discharged herefrom without costs against them or either of them; but if they fail to make such payment on said first day of January next, then such execution is to be issued and enforced against said garnishees and their and each of their property, as their costs.'
To this order and judgment said garnishees excepted, and sued out this writ of error.
Argued by Mr. C. E. Bretherton for the plaintiff in error.
Submitted on printed arguments by Messrs Clough & Wheat, for the defendant in error.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic Transport Company of West Virginia v. Maryland ex rel Szczesek

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
234 U.S. 63
Atlantic Transport Company of West Virginia v. Maryland ex rel Szczesek
Argued: January 29 and 30, 1914. --- Decided: May 25, 1914
Messrs. Edward Duffy, Nicholas P. Bond, and Ralph Robinson for petitioner.
Messrs.
W. H. Price, Jr., John E. Semmes, John E. Semmes, Jr., Jesse N. Bowen, and Matthew Gault for respondent.
Mr. Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic Transport Company of West Virginia v. Maryland ex rel Szczesek/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
234 U.S. 63
Atlantic Transport Company of West Virginia v. Maryland ex rel Szczesek
Argued: January 29 and 30, 1914. --- Decided: May 25, 1914
This is a libel filed on behalf of the widow and infant children of Martin Szczesek to recover damages for injuries resulting in his death. Szczesek was a stevedore in the employ of the Atlantic Transport
Company, the petitioner, and was engaged in loading the ship Pretoria. The district court allowed a recovery against the petitioner (190 Fed. 240), which the circuit court of appeals affirmed. 113 C. C. A. 408, 193 Fed. 1019.
The questions presented are the same as those which were considered in Atlantic Transport Co. v. Imbrovek, decided this day [[[233 U.S. 52]], 58 L. ed. --, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 733], and, for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the decree is affirmed.
Affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Atlantic and Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines Ltd

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
369 U.S. 355
Atlantic and Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines Ltd
Argued: Feb. 20, 1962. --- Decided: April 2, 1962
See 369 U.S. 882, 82 S.Ct. 1137. Francis E. Marshall, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.
Martin J. McHugh, New York City, for National Ass'n of Stevedores, amicus curiae.
Thomas E. Byrne, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., for respondents.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse