OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# National Bank v. Warren/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
96 U.S. 539
National Bank v. Warren
This action goes upon the theory that the mere non-resistance of a debtor to judicial proceedings against him, when the debt is due and there is no valid defence to it, is the suffering and giving a preference under the Bankrupt Act. This theory is expressly repudiated in the case of Wilson v. City Bank, 17 Wall. 473. It is also held in that case that the facts that the debtor does not himself file the petition in bankruptcy under such circumstance, and that the creditor was aware of the insolvency of the debtor, do not avoid the judgment and execution. In the present case, there is not proven a single fact or circumstance tending to show a concurrence or aid on the part of the debtors in obtaining the judgment or securing the payment of the debt. Their only effort was to obtain delay, apparently in the hope of relief from the embarrassments which finally overwhelmed them.
The decree of the Circuit Court must be reversed, and that of the District Court, dismissing the bill with costs, affirmed; and it is
So ordered.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Bank v. Warren

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
96 U.S. 539
National Bank v. Warren
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
The Tenth National Bank of New York, having an undisputed debt against the firm of Sanger & Co., of about $10,000, endeavored to obtain its money by persuasion, but received only fair words in return. After pursuing this policy for several months, it brought suit against the debtors, Nov. 3, 1870. They received delay and indulgence in its prosecution, and judgment was rendered against them on the 12th of January, 1871. Execution was issued on that day, and a levy made upon their property. Yielding again to their solicitations, the bank did not press an immediate sale under the execution, and on the 24th of February, 1871, bankruptcy proceedings were commenced by their other creditors. The sale upon the execution was stayed by an injunction in the present suit, which was instituted by Warren & Rowe, assignees in bankruptcy of Sanger & Co., to set aside the judgment and execution as fraudulent and void.
This injunction was afterwards modified by allowing a sale, and directing the sheriff to hold the proceeds subject to the order of the court.
The District Court ultimately dismissed the bill with costs. That decree having, on appeal, been reversed by the Circuit Court, the bank brought the case here.
Mr. A. J. Vanderpoel for the appellant.
This case is, in substance, identical with Wilson v. City Bank, 17 Wall. 473.
There is no evidence whatever of any intent to give the bank a preference. Partridge v. Dearborn, 2 Low. 286; Hoover v. Greenbaum, 61 N. Y. 305; Sleek v. Turner, 76 Pa. St. 142; Henkelman v. Smith, 42 Md. 164.
Mr. Austen G. Fox, contra.
This case comes within the class of cases represented by Buchanan v. Smith (16 Wall. 277), and not that represented by Wilson v. City Bank (17 id. 473).
The liens obtained by the bank were a preference, and there fore void as against the assignees in bankruptcy.
MR. JUSTICE HUNT, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Bank v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
101 U.S. 1
NATIONAL BANK v. UNITED STATES.
The only question presented is as to the constitutionality of sect. 3413 of the Revised Statutes, the objection being that the tax is virtually laid upon an instrumentality of the State of Arkansas.
We think this case comes directly within the principles settled in Veazie Bank v. Fenno (8 Wall. 533), where it was distinctly held that the tax imposed by that section on national and State banks for paying out the notes of individuals or State banks used for circulation was not unconstitutional. The reason is thus stated by Mr. Chief Justice Chase: 'Having thus, in the exercise of undisputed constitutional powers, undertaken to provide a currency for the whole country, it cannot be questioned that Congress may constitutionally secure the benefit of it to the people by appropriate legislation. To this end Congress has denied the quality of legal tender to foreign coins, and has provided by law against the imposition of counterfeit and base coin on the community. To the same end Congress may restrain, by suitable enactments, the circulation as money of any notes not issued under its authority. Without this power, indeed, its attempts to secure a sound and uniform currency for the country must be futile.' p. 549.
The tax thus laid is not on the obligation, but on its use in a particular way. As against the United States, a State municipality has no right to put its notes in circulation as money. It may execute its obligations, but cannot, against the will of Congress, make them money. The tax is on the notes paid out, that is, made use of as a circulating medium. Such a use is against the policy of the United States. Therefore the banker who helps to keep up the use by paying them out, that is, employing them as the equivalent of money in discharging his obligations, is taxed for what he does. The taxation was no doubt intended to destroy the use; but that, as has just been seen, Congress had the power to do.
Judgment affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Bank v. Omaha/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
96 U.S. 737
National Bank v. Omaha
The decree is this case was rendered Nov. 13, 1874; and at the end appears the following entry:--
'Whereupon said complainant, by its solicitor, prays an appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States, which is allowed; and bond to be given on said appeal is fixed at $500.'
A bond was filed Sept. 30, 1875, which appears to have been approved by the clerk, and not by the judge. No citation has been issued or served, and there is no appearance in this court by the appellees.
We have decided at the present term, in Sage v. Railroad Company (supra, p. 712), that, even though an appeal is asked for in open court, if the security is not taken until after the term, 'a citation should be issued to bring in the parties, unless they voluntarily appear, for, until the security has been accepted, the allowance of the appeal cannot be said to have been perfected;' and, in O'Reilly v. Edrington (supra, p. 724), that 'the security upon writs of error and appeals must be taken by the judge or justice. He cannot delegate this power to the clerk.'
Appeal dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Millan-Garcia v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
382 U.S. 69
Millan-Garcia v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Antonio Hector Millan-Garcia, pro se.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Julia P. Cooper, for respondent.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mill o' Tiftie's Annie, or, Andrew Lammie, the trumpeter of Fyvie (1)

Printed by George Clark and Son, in Aberdeen.
MILL O' TIFTIE'S ANNIE:
OR,
ANDREW LAMMIE,
The Trumpeter of Fyvie.
Aberdeen: GEO. CLARK AND SON, 17, BROAD STREET,
MDCCCLXVIII.
Mill o' Tiftie's Annie.
The ill-starred loves of Tiftie's bonnie Annie, and the Trumpeter of Fyvie, have already been made familiar to the reader of Ballad poetry by Mr. Jamieson, who has published in his collection two different sets of this simple but not unpathetic ditty. Neither of these sets, however, is so complete as the present version, which is a reprint from a stall copy published at Glasgow several years ago, collated with a recited copy, which has furnished one or two verbal improvements.
"The beauty, gallantry, and aimiable qualities of Bonny Andrew Lammie,' seem," says Mr. Jamieson, "to have been proverbial wherever he went, and the good old cummer in Allan Ramsay, as the best evidence of the power of her own youthful charms, and the best apology for her having cast a leggen girth hersel, says,
"In this instanec, as in most others in the same piece, it seems most probable that Allan Ramsay forgot that he was writing of the days of the original author of 'Christis kirk on the Green,' and copied only the manners and traditions of his own times. If a woman, who could boast of having had an intrigue with the Trumpeter of Fyvie, was hale and hearty at the time when Allan wrote, we may reasonably suppose poor Tiftie's Nanny, to have died sometime about the year 1670." This conjecturc, as to the period when
is very near the truth, if the notice contained in the title of the stall copy referred to can be admitted as evidence on the point. It is this:—"Andrew Lammie: or Mill o' Tiftie's Annie. This Tragedy was acted in the year 1674."
​It has been remarked by Mr. Jamieson that "this ballad is almost entirely without rhymes, as cadence in the measure is all that seems aimed at; and the few instances of rhyme that occur, appear to be rather casual than intentional." Though the present set is not so faulty in this respect as in the copies which came under Mr. Jamieson's observation, it, as well as the others, has another peculiarity descrving attention, namely, the studied recurrence of rhyme in the middle of 1st and 3rd lines of a great many of the stanzas.
It may be stated, that the present set of the ballad agrees with any recited copy which the Editor has hitherto met with in the West Country.
W. BENNETT, PRINTER.
* ↑ Vide Popular Ballads and Songs. Edinburgh, 1806. Vol. I, p. 129, and vol. II. p. 382.
* ↑ In one printed copy, this is "Sheugh," and in a recited copy, it was called "Skew;" which is the right reading, the editor, from his ignorance of the topography of the lands of Fyvie, is unable to say. It is a received superstition in Scotland that, when friends or lovers part at a bridge, they shall never meet again.
# Millan-Garcia v. Immigration and Naturalization Service/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
382 U.S. 69
Millan-Garcia v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals upon examination of the entire record and in light of the representations of the Solicitor General that the petitioner will be afforded an opportunity to apply for citizenship and that there will be no deportation proceedings until such determination.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Navy Commendation Medal - G. T. Coker

THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON
The Secretary of the Navy takes pleasure in presenting the NAVY COMMENDATION MEDAL to
LIEUTENANT GEORGE THOMAS COKER UNITED STATES NAVAL RESERVE
for service as set forth in the following
CITATION:
    For heroic achievement while participating in aerial flight on 30 June 1966, as bombardier/navigator of a jet aircraft, serving with Attack Squadron SIXTY-FIVE, embarked in USS CONSTELLATION (CVA-64), during aerial combat operations in Southeast Asia. Lieutenant (then Lieutenant, Junior Grade) Coker participated in a daring and dangerous daylight air-wing strike involving nineteen aircraft, against the Ground-Controlled Intercept Site at Kep, North Vietnam. Although opposed by intense antiaircraft-artillery and automatic-weapons fire, and while flying through extremely adverse weather conditions in a known operating area for enemy aircraft and surface-to-air missiles, he navigated his aircraft with great precision, keeping his pilot fully advised of flak and the positions of other aircraft. Lieutenant Coker's skillful management of the aircraft's ordnance system while coaching his pilot as to dive angle, airspeed, and altitude contributed to the achievement of an accurate bombing run. The strike inflicted severe damage to the deeply-revetted and well-protected vans and radar stations. Lieutenant Coker's effective utilization of electronic countermeasures equipment throughout the flight provided valuable security for the strike group. By his superb professional skill and courageous actions under fire, he upheld the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service.
The Combat Distinguishing Device is authorized.
* Secretary of the Navy
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Navy Commendation Medal - John McCain

The Commendation Medal is a mid-level United States military award which is presented for sustained acts of heroism or meritorious service. For valorous actions in direct contact with an enemy force, but of a lesser degree than required for the award of the Bronze Star, the Valor device ("V" device) may be authorized as an attachment to the decoration.
| ​ THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON The Secretary of the Navy takes pleasure in presenting the NAVY COMMENDATION MEDAL to LIEUTENANT COMMANDER JOHN S. MC CAIN III UNITED STATES NAVY for service as set forth in the following CITATION: For meritorious achievement in aerial flight on 18 October 1967 as a pilot in Attack Squadron ONE HUNDRED SIXTY-THREE, embarked in USS ORISKANY (CVA-34). As section leader, Lieutenant Commander McCain participated in a twenty-two-plane strike against the Lac Trai shipyard and repair facility in Haiphong, North Vietnam. Although violent evasive maneuvers were required to avoid enemy surface-to–air missiles and an intense barrage of antiaircraft fire along the fight path to the target, he maintained flight integrity and expertly positioned his section for attack. In the face of heavy enemy fire, he led his section in the attack and placed his bombs directly on target, thereby inflicting major damage to his assigned area. By his aggressiveness and skillful airmanship, Lieutenant Commander McCain contributed substantially to the success of the mission and upheld the highest traditions of the United States Naval service. The Combat Distinguishing Device is authorized. Secretary of the Navy | Navy Commendation Medal |
US Navy Release of documents
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Navy Clinical Psychology Internship Program Training Manual

NAVY CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY INTERNSHIP PROGRAM TRAINING MANUAL
Revised 01 AUG 2016
MEDICAL CENTER DIRECTOR
Colonel Michael S. Heimall
Medical Service Corps, United States Army
PROGRAM DIRECTOR
Richard D. Bergthold, Psy.D.
CAPT, MSC, USN (ret)
(301) 319-2997
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Department of Behavioral Health Consultation and Education
8901 Wisconsin Avenue
Bethesda, MD 20889
# Navy Commendation Medal and a Gold Star letter - G. T. Coker

THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
WASHINGTON
The Secretary of the Navy takes pleasure in presenting the NAVY COMMENDATION MEDAL and a Gold Star in lieu of the SECOND NAVY COMMENDATION MEDAL to
LIEUTENANT (JUNIOR GRADE) GEORGE T. COKER
UNITED STATES NAVAL RESERVE
for service as set forth in the following
    CITATION:
    For meritorious achievement in aerial flight. By his skill, courage and devotion to duty, Lieutenant (jg) Coker upheld the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service.
The Combat Distinguishing Device is authorized.
/s/ Paul H. Nitze 9 DEC 1966
| Copy to: CITATION FILES PERS-16 (3) 01-430 | Secretary of the Navy |
Ref: SecNav ltr of 15 Nov 66 (Bd ser 8270 of 15 Nov 66)
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Navy Clinical Psychology Internship Program Training Manual/Preface

PREFACE
The following Manual provides a detailed description of the principles, aims, and competencies of the Navy Clinical Psychology Program at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, one of three Navy Clinical Psychology Internships. The other Navy internship sites are located at the Naval Medical Center, San Diego, CA, and the Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth, VA. Only the Internship programs at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and Naval Medical Center San Diego participate in the Association of Psychology Post-Doctoral and Internship Centers (APPIC) Match. Applicants have the option of applying to one or both sites. Applications are reviewed by a single Navy Selection Board. Matches are dependent on the rankings of applicants made by the Selection Board and by the rankings of the Navy sites made by the applicants. It is important for the applicant to acquire sufficient information about both sites so that informed rankings can be made. Any resulting APPIC Match with a Navy internship will be with one specific hiring site.
Applications for the Navy Clinical Psychology Internship Programs have two parts: 1) the standard application and supporting documents submitted for the APPIC Match, and 2) the information needed to establish the applicant's qualifications to be commissioned as a naval officer. The second part of the application MUST be completed with the assistance of a Navy Medical Programs Officer Recruiter (see Appendix A for additional information).
The Navy internship sites do not function as a formal Consortium as defined by the American Psychological Association, although their programs are similar and they work in cooperation with one another.
The Navy internship sites will make a reasonable effort to share address lists of persons who write requesting information from any particular site. However, it remains the responsibility of the applicant to seek out the information he/she needs to make informed decisions.
PROGRAM DIRECTORS
| Richard Bergthold, PsyD Psychology Program Director Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Bethesda, MD richard.d.bergthod.civ@mail.mil | CDR Michael Franks, USPHS Psychology Program Director Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, VA, 23708 michael.j.franks2.mil@mail.mil |
* David Mather, PhD., ABPP Psychology Program Director Naval Medical Center San Diego, CA david.b.mather2.civ@mail.mil
NAVY NATIONAL TRAINING DIRECTOR
Eric Getka, PhD
Navy Psychology National Training Director
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Bethesda, MD
eric.i.getka.civ@mail.mil
# Navy Commendation Medal and a Gold Star - G. T. Coker

THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
WASHINGTON
The Secretary of the Navy takes pleasure in presenting the NAVY COMMENDATION MEDAL (Gold Star in lieu of the Second Award) to
LIEUTENANT GEORGE T. COKER
UNITED STATES NAVAL RESERVE
for service as set for in the following
    CITATION:
    For heroic achievement while participating in aerial flight on 2 August 1966, as bombardier/navigator of a jet aircraft, serving with Attack Squadron SIXTY-FIVE, embarked in USS CONSTELLATION (CVA-64), during aerial combat operations in Southeast Asia. Lieutenant (then Lieutenant, Junior Grade) Coker participated in a coordinated air-wing strike involving twenty-three aircraft, against the POL (petroleum, oil and lubricants) Storage Area in the city of Haiphong, North Vietnam. Although opposed by extremely intense and accurate antiaircraft-artillery fire which actually hit his aircraft prior to the bombing run, he courageously continued to operate both the attack navigation radar system and the electronic countermeasures equipment in his aircraft while coaching his pilot in dive angle, airspeed, and altitude. These actions contributed materially to the completion of a highly accurate bombing attack under adverse weather conditions, which inflicted severe damage on the target. Post-strike photography revealed that all except one of the assigned POL storage tanks were destroyed. Lieutenant Coker's outstanding professional competence and composure under fire were in keeping with the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service.
The Combat Distinguishing Device is authorized.
* Secretary of the Navy
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Navy Commendation Medal and a second Gold Star - G. T. Coker

THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
WASHINGTON D. C. 20350
The Secretary of the Navy takes pleasure in presenting the NAVY COMMENDATION MEDAL (Gold Star in lieu of the Third Award) to
LIEUTENANT COMMANDER GEORGE T. COKER
UNITED STATES NAVAL RESERVE
for service as set forth in the following
    CITATION:
    For meritorious service while interred as a Prisoner of War in North Vietnam from 1 August 1972 to 15 January 1973. During this period, although under constant surveillance from his captors, he performed duties involving highly classified material in an exemplary and professional manner. Through his zealousness and ingenuity, he generated new ideas and improvised techniques greatly enhancing covert operations. Although in a hostile environment, he never wavered in his devotion and loyalty to the United States and his fellow prisoners. By his inspiring courage, exceptional skill, and resourcefulness, he reflected credit upon himself and upheld the highest traditions of the Naval Service and the United States Armed Forces.
The Combat Distinguishing Device is authorized.
* Secretary of the Navy
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mr. Higginbotham's Catastrophe

published in Twice-Told Tales