OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# National Surety Company v. Architectural Decorating Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
226 U.S. 276
National Surety Company v. Architectural Decorating Company
Argued: October 28, 1912. --- Decided: December 2, 1912
Messrs. Ded L. Washburn, W. D. Bailey, and Oscar Mitchell for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 276-278 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Arcadius L. Agatin for defendant in error.
Mr Justice Pitney delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Trailer Convoy v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
394 U.S. 849
National Trailer Convoy v. United States
William J. Lippman, Robert Joyner and Roland Rice, for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane and Raymond M. Zimmet, for appellees United States and others.
William P. Sullivan and William P. Jackson, Jr., for appellee Contract Carrier Conference of American Trucking Ass'ns, Inc.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Surety Company v. Coriell

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
289 U.S. 426
National Surety Company v. Coriell
Argued: Dec. 15, 1933. --- Decided: May 22, 1933
Messrs. Charles H. Tuttle and Saul S. Myers, both of New York City, for petitioners.
Messrs. John S. Sheppard and Charles B. McInnis, both of New York City, for respondents.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mennonite Handbook of Information/Chapter 17

CHAPTER XVII
THE WAR OF 1812 AND THE MEXICAN WAR
The United States army during these wars being made up of volunteers, people of nonresistant faith had no occasion to be disturbed. The old army records of those periods indicate, however, that persons of Mennonite parentage in Pennsylvania and Virginia were enlisted in the ranks and saw service in both these wars. As a rule these were young men not at the time holding membership with the Church.
For generations before and after the Mexican War the United States government established a general law requiring every able-bodied citizen to take no less than four days of military training every year. By paying a fine of fifty cents a day for each absence from these training-days, which were known as muster drills, Mennonites avoided doing violence to conscience.
The two war periods referred to became very unpopular with many people of the United States because the armies were marched out of their native country to places far from their homes. Thousands sickened and died during camp life and in certain instances whole battallions and regiments refused in a body to cross the borders of their country either into Canada or Mexico.
During these wars Mennonites became largely engaged in the production of foodstuffs, and owing to the advance in prices many of them became wealthy ​and were able to lay up much goods for themselves and their children. It was the first era of prosperity and sumptuous living for Mennonites in America.
# Mennonite Handbook of Information/Chapter 10

CHAPTER X
SIDE LIGHTS TO MENNONITE HISTORY
After the first permanent colonies had been established by Mennonites at Germantown, Skippach, Lancaster, and other points in Pennsylvania, as referred to in previous chapters, there came the strong inclination, in the hope of obtaining the choicest lands and freedom from molestation from neighbors of different nationality, for our people to penetrate farther into the interior of the country. William Penn's treaty with the Indians had the effect for Quakers and Mennonites to feel entirely immune from attack and readily choose to neighbor with the Indian and share with him a common hunting ground.
This venturesome spirit took many of our Mennonite people far beyond the border of regular settlements, and in fact some groups of families often located in the deeper recesses of the wilderness. In this way Mennonites found their way at very early periods into sections of the Cumberland valley of Pennsylvania and Maryland and the Shenandoah valley of Virginia, and where, for a whole generation, not a drop of Quaker or Mennonite blood was ever shed at the hands of the Indians.
At such times and with the really primitive conditions by which they were surrounded, each Mennonite home could worship the God of heaven, and earth under its own vine and forest tree.
​Where it was convenient, two or more families joined in a season of worship on Sabbath days. In such homes the large quarto-sized family Bible held first place on the center table. Still there were other books constituting the library of these pioneer homes, such as the Book of Martyrs, Psalm books and Prayer books, the Wandering Soul and others, most if not all of which were in German, and were brought along over seas from Europe.
Up until a certain period in the History of America it is evident that as a nonresistant and nonproselyting people the Mennonites are known to have more often fallen victims to persecution and disturbance from their white brethren of different customs and practices from their own, than from Indian attack.
It is evident that the six hundred Palatinates who were sent to the Carolinas as mentioned in the story of Rudolph Cronau, penetrated into the interior of the states until they came in full view of the Blue mountains in what are now Guilford, Yadkin, Watauga and Catawba counties, where the family names of Heatwole, Hildebrand, Weaver, etc., prevail that are familiar with Mennonites in other states.
This section of North Carolina, in years past, was visited by John S. Coffman, M. S. Steiner, J. F, Brunk, and C. K. Hostetler, and they found people who were religiously nonresistant in sentiment and faith, but otherwise and to all appearance have long since been swept wholly into the common mould of Americanism.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume III/Doctrinal Treatises of St. Augustin/On the Holy Trinity/Book V/Chapter 2

Chapter 2.—God the Only Unchangeable Essence.
3. He is, however, without doubt, a substance, or, if it be better so to call it, an essence, which the Greeks call οὐσία. For as wisdom is so called from the being wise, and knowledge from knowing; so from being comes that which we call essence. And who is there that is, more than He who said to His servant Moses, “I am that I am;” and, “Thus shall thou say unto the children of Israel, He who is hath sent me unto you?” But other things that are called essences or substances admit of accidents, whereby a change, whether great or small, is produced in them. But there can be no accident of this kind in respect to God; and therefore He who is God is the only unchangeable substance or essence, to whom certainly being itself, whence comes the name of essence, most especially and most truly belongs. For that which is changed does not retain its own being; and that which can be changed, although it be not actually changed, is able not to be that which it had been; and hence that which not only is not changed, but also cannot at all be changed, alone falls most truly, without difficulty or hesitation, under the category of being.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Esse
* ↑ Ex. iii. 14
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume III/Doctrinal Treatises of St. Augustin/On the Holy Trinity/Book V/Chapter 4

Chapter 4.—The Accidental Always Implies Some Change in the Thing.
5. That which is accidental commonly implies that it can be lost by some change of the thing to which it is an accident. For although some accidents are said to be inseparable, which in Greek are called ἀχώριστα, as the color black is to the feather of a raven; yet the feather loses that color, not indeed so long as it is a feather, but because the feather is not always. Wherefore the matter itself is changeable; and whenever that animal or that feather ceases to be, and the whole of that body is changed and turned into earth, it loses certainly that color also. Although the kind of accident which is called separable may likewise be lost, not by separation, but by change; as, for instance, blackness is called a separable accident to the hair of men, because hair continuing to be hair can grow white; yet, if carefully considered, it is sufficiently apparent, that it is not as if anything departed by separation away from the head when it grows white, as though blackness departed thence and went somewhere and whiteness came in its place, but that the quality of color there is turned and changed. Therefore there is nothing accidental in God, because there is nothing changeable or that may be lost. But if you choose to call that also accidental, which, although it may not be lost, yet can be decreased or increased,—as, for instance, the life of the soul: for as long as it is a soul, so long it lives, and because the soul is always, it always lives; but because it lives more when it is wise, and less when it is foolish, here, too, some change comes to pass, not such that life is absent, as wisdom is absent to the foolish, but such that it is less;—nothing of this kind, either, happens to God, because He remains altogether unchangeable.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume III/Doctrinal Treatises of St. Augustin/On the Holy Trinity/Book V/Chapter 3

Chapter 3.—The Argument of the Arians is Refuted, Which is Drawn from the Words Begotten and Unbegotten.
4. Wherefore,—to being now to answer the adversaries of our faith, respecting those things also, which are neither said as they are thought, nor thought as they really are:—among the many things which the Arians are wont to dispute against the Catholic faith, they seem chiefly to set forth this, as their most crafty device, namely, that whatsoever is said or understood of God, is said not according to accident, but according to substance, and therefore, to be unbegotten belongs to the Father according to substance, and to be begotten belongs to the Son according to substance; but to be unbegotten and to be begotten are different; therefore the substance of the Father and that of the Son are different. To whom we reply, If whatever is spoken of God is spoken according to substance, then that which is said, “I and the Father are one,” is spoken according to substance. Therefore there is one substance of the Father and the Son. Or if this is not said according to substance, then something is said of God not according to substance, and therefore we are no longer compelled to understand unbegotten and begotten according to substance. It is also said of the Son, “He thought it not robbery to be equal with God.” We ask, equal according to what? For if He is not said to be equal according to substance, then they admit that something may be said of God not according to substance. Let them admit, then, that unbegotten and begotten are not spoken according to substance. And if they do not admit this, on the ground that they will have all things to be spoken of God according to substance, then the Son is equal to the Father according to substance.

## Footnotes

* ↑ John x. 30
* ↑ Phil. ii. 6
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume III/Doctrinal Treatises of St. Augustin/On the Holy Trinity/Book V/Chapter 9

Chapter 9.—The Three Persons Not Properly So Called [in a Human Sense].
But because with us the usage has already obtained, that by essence we understand the same thing which is understood by substance; we do not dare to say one essence, three substances, but one essence or substance and three persons: as many writers in Latin, who treat of these things, and are of authority, have said, in that they could not find any other more suitable way by which to enunciate in words that which they understood without words. For, in truth, as the Father is not the Son, and the Son is not the Father, and that Holy Spirit who is also called the gift of God is neither the Father nor the Son, certainly they are three. And so it is said plurally, “I and my Father are one.” For He has not said, “is one,” as the Sabellians say; but, “are one.” Yet, when the question is asked, What three? human language labors altogether under great poverty of speech. The answer, however, is given, three “persons,” not that it might be [completely] spoken, but that it might not be left [wholly] unspoken.

## Footnotes

* ↑ John x. 30
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume III/Doctrinal Treatises of St. Augustin/On the Holy Trinity/Book VI

Book VI.
The question is proposed, how the apostle calls Christ “the power of God, and the wisdom of God.” And an argument is raised, whether the Father is not wisdom Himself, but only the Father of wisdom; or whether Wisdom begat Wisdom. But the answer to this is deferred for a little, while the unity and equality of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, are proved; and that we ought to believe in a Trinity, not in a threefold (triplicem) god. Lastly, that saying of Hilary is explained, eternity in the Father, appearance in the image, use in the gift.

## Contents

* Chapter 1
* Chapter 2
* Chapter 3
* Chapter 4
* Chapter 5
* Chapter 6
* Chapter 7
* Chapter 8
* Chapter 9
* Chapter 10
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I/Volume III/Doctrinal Treatises of St. Augustin/On the Holy Trinity/Book V/Chapter 5

Chapter 5.—Nothing is Spoken of God According to Accident, But According to Substance or According to Relation.
6. Wherefore nothing in Him is said in respect to accident, since nothing is accidental to Him, and yet all that is said is not said according to substance. For in created and changeable things, that which is not said according to substance, must, by necessary alternative, be said according to accident. For all things are accidents to them, which can be either lost or diminished, whether magnitudes or qualities; and so also is that which is said in relation to something, as friendships, relationships, services, likenesses, equalities, and anything else of the kind; so also positions and conditions, places and times, acts and passions. But in God nothing is said to be according to accident, because in Him nothing is changeable; and yet everything that is said, is not said, according to substance. For it is said in relation to something, as the Father in relation to the Son and the Son in relation to the Father, which is not accident; because both the one is always Father, and the other is always Son: yet not “always,” meaning from the time when the Son was born [natus], so that the Father ceases not to be the Father because the Son never ceases to be the Son, but because the Son was always born, and never began to be the Son. But if He had begun to be at any time, or were at any time to cease to be, the Son, then He would be called Son according to accident. But if the Father, in that He is called the Father, were so called in relation to Himself, not to the Son; and the Son, in that He is called the Son, were so called in relation to Himself, not to the Father; then both the one would be called Father, and the other Son, according to substance. But because the Father is not called the Father except in that He has a Son, and the Son is not called Son except in that He has a Father, these things are not said according to substance; because each of them is not so called in relation to Himself, but the terms are used reciprocally and in relation each to the other; nor yet according to accident, because both the being called the Father, and the being called the Son, is eternal and unchangeable to them. Wherefore, although to be the Father and to be the Son is different, yet their substance is not different; because they are so called, not according to substance, but according to relation, which relation, however, is not accident, because it is not changeable.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Habitus
# New Jersey Statutes Annotated/Title 1

* CHAPTER 1. DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL RULES OF CONSTRUCTION
* CHAPTER 2. ENACTMENT OF LAWS IN GENERAL
* CHAPTER 3. PRINTING, BINDING AND DISTRIBUTION OF LAWS, JOINT RESOLUTIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS
* CHAPTER 4. SENATE JOURNAL AND ASSEMBLY MINUTES; PRINTING, BINDING AND DISTRIBUTION; CURRENT LEGISLATIVE PRINTING
* CHAPTER 5. REFERENDUM STATUTES
* CHAPTER 6. ENACTMENT OF PRIVATE, SPECIAL AND LOCAL ACTS
* CHAPTER 7. JUDICIAL ANNULMENT OF LAWS OR JOINT RESOLUTIONS
* CHAPTER 8. UNIFORM LEGISLATION COMMISSIONERS
* CHAPTER 9. PERMANENT LAW REVISION COMMISSION [REPEALED]
* CHAPTER 10. COMMISSION TO REVISE AND CONSOLIDATE THE PUBLIC LAWS
* CHAPTER 11. ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REVISION OF STATUTES [REPEALED]
* CHAPTER 12. LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION ON STATUTE REVISION [REPEALED]
* CHAPTER 12A. LAW REVISION COMMISSION
* CHAPTER 13. COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL LAW REVISION COMMISSION
* CHAPTER 14. CORPORATION AND BUSINESS LAW COMMISSIONS
* CHAPTER 15. INSURANCE LAW REVISION COMMISSION [REPEALED]
* CHAPTER 16. EMINENT DOMAIN REVISION COMMISSION [REPEALED]
* CHAPTER 17. ELECTION LAW REVISION COMMISSION [REPEALED]
* CHAPTER 18. JUVENILE COURT LAW REVISION COMMISSION [REPEALED]
* CHAPTER 19. CRIMINAL LAW REVISION COMMISSION [REPEALED]
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# New Jersey Statutes Annotated/Title 2C

* SUBTITLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
** CHAPTER 1. PRELIMINARY
** CHAPTER 2. GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF LIABILITY
** CHAPTER 3. GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF JUSTIFICATION
** CHAPTER 4. RESPONSIBILITY
** CHAPTER 5. INCHOATE CRIMES
** CHAPTER 6. BAIL
** CHAPTER 7. REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION OF RELEASE OF CERTAIN OFFENDERS
** CHAPTER 8. [RESERVED]
** CHAPTER 10. [RESERVED]
* SUBTITLE 2. DEFINITION OF SPECIFIC OFFENSES
** PART 1. OFFENSES INVOLVING DANGER TO THE PERSON
** PART 2. OFFENSES AGAINST PROPERTY
** PART 3. OFFENSES AGAINST OTHERS
** PART 4. OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
** PART 5. OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER, HEALTH AND DECENCY
** PART 6. OFFENSES INVOLVING ORGANIZED CRIME AND ORGANIZED CRIME ACTIVITIES
* SUBTITLE 3. SENTENCING
** CHAPTER 43. AUTHORIZED DISPOSITION OF OFFENDERS
** CHAPTER 44. AUTHORITY OF COURT IN SENTENCING
** CHAPTER 45. SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE; PROBATION
** CHAPTER 46. FINES AND RESTITUTION
** CHAPTER 47. ADULT DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT CENTER
** CHAPTER 48. CRIMINAL DISPOSITION COMMISSION [REPEALED]
** CHAPTER 48A. CRIMINAL SENTENCING AND DISPOSITION COMMISSION
** CHAPTER 49. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT
** CHAPTER 50. [RESERVED]
** CHAPTER 51. LOSS AND RESTORATION OF RIGHTS INCIDENT TO CONVICTION OF AN OFFENSE
** CHAPTER 52. EXPUNGEMENT OF RECORDS
** CHAPTER 53. [RESERVED]
** CHAPTER 57. [RESERVED]
** CHAPTER 58. LICENSING AND OTHER PROVISIONS RELATING TO FIREARMS
** CHAPTER 59. [RESERVED]
** CHAPTER 61. [RESERVED]
** CHAPTER 62. WILLFUL NONSUPPORT
** CHAPTER 63. [RESERVED]
** CHAPTER 64. FORFEITURE
** CHAPTER 65. DISPOSITION OF STOLEN PROPERTY AND DOCUMENTARY EXHIBITS
** CHAPTER 66. ATTACHMENT, FREEZING OF TERRORIST FUNDS
** CHAPTER 67. [RESERVED]
** CHAPTER 97. [RESERVED]
** CHAPTER 98. REPEALERS, ALLOCATIONS AND EFFECTIVE DATE
** CHAPTER 99. [RESERVED]
** CHAPTER 103. [RESERVED]
** CHAPTER 104. MATERIAL WITNESSES
# New Jersey Rules of Court/Part 7

* RULE 7:1. SCOPE
* RULE 7:2. PROCESS
* RULE 7:3. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTING JUDGE; PRETRIAL RELEASE
* RULE 7:4. BAIL
* RULE 7:5. SEARCH WARRANTS; SUPPRESSION
* RULE 7:6. ARRAIGNMENT, PLEAS
* RULE 7:7. PRETRIAL PROCEDURES
* RULE 7:8. TRIAL
* RULE 7:9. SENTENCE AND JUDGMENT
* RULE 7:10. POST-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS
* RULE 7:11. SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS FOR COLLECTION OF STATUTORY PENALTIES [DELETED]
* RULE 7:12. TRIAL OF TRAFFIC OFFENSES
* RULE 7:13. APPEALS
* RULE 7:14. GENERAL PROVISIONS; ADMINISTRATION
* APPENDIX TO PART VII. GUIDELINES FOR OPERATION OF PLEA AGREEMENTS IN THE MUNICIPAL COURTS OF NEW JERSEY
* SECOND APPENDIX TO PART VII. GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINATION OF CONSEQUENCE OF MAGNITUDE (SEE RULE 7:3-2)
# New Jersey Statutes Annotated/Title 2A

* SUBTITLE 1. THE COURTS
* SUBTITLE 2. ATTORNEYS, COUNSELLORS AND BAR EXAMINERS
* SUBTITLE 3. LIMITATION OF CIVIL ACTIONS; ADVERSE POSSESSION
* SUBTITLE 4. CIVIL ACTIONS
* SUBTITLE 5. ASSIGNMENT FOR BENEFIT OF CREDITORS; INSOLVENT DEBTORS
* SUBTITLE 6. SPECIFIC CIVIL ACTIONS
* SUBTITLE 6A. SPECIFIC CIVIL OR CRIMINAL ACTIONS
* SUBTITLE 7. PROCEDURE IN LIEU OF PREROGATIVE WRITS AND HABEAS CORPUS
* SUBTITLE 7A. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND INVESTIGATIONS
* SUBTITLE 8. JURIES
* SUBTITLE 9. EVIDENCE, WITNESSES AND PUBLIC HEARINGS
* SUBTITLE 10. CRIMES
* SUBTITLE 11. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
* SUBTITLE 12. DISORDERLY PERSONS
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# New Jersey Statutes Annotated/Title 2C/Subtitle 2 Part 5

the possession of a hypodermic syringe or needle by a consumer who participates in or an employee or volunteer of a sterile syringe Access program established persistent 2 section 3 and 4 of p. L. 2006, c. 99 and shall not constitute an offense persistent prosecution. No court in the state of New Jersey shall thus prosecute for N.J.Stat.2c:36-6a if persons participates in or employment of the program. provision shall be extended to a hypodermic syringe or needle that contains a residual amount of controlled dangerous substance or controlled substance analogue.
History: . 2006, c. 9 9, 8, e f f DEC. 1 9, 2006
# New Jersey Rules of Court/Part 8

* RULE 8:1. SCOPE: APPLICABILITY
* RULE 8:2. REVIEW JURISDICTION
* RULE 8:3. COMMENCEMENT OF ACTION; PLEADINGS
* RULE 8:4. TIME
* RULE 8:5. PROCESS
* RULE 8:6. PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS; ASSIGNMENT TO TRACKS AND CASE MANAGEMENT
* RULE 8:7. MOTIONS
* RULE 8:8. TRIALS
* RULE 8:9. JUDGMENT
* RULE 8:10. NEW TRIALS; AMENDMENT OF FINDINGS OR JUDGMENTS
* RULE 8:11. SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION; PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
* RULE 8:12. FILING FEES