OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Henry VI Part 1 (1918) Yale/Appendix E

Layout 2
APPENDIX E
Suggestions for Collateral Reading
George Lockhart Rives: An Essay on the First, Second, and Third Parts of Henry the Sixth; Commonly attributed to Shakespeare. 1874. (Harness Prize Essay. Largely based on Grant White's earlier monograph on the same subject.)
F. G. Fleay: Who Wrote 'Henry VI'? Macmillan's Magazine, November, 1875.
Life and Work of Shakspere, 1886, 255–263.
W. H. Egerton: Talbot's Tomb in the Parish Church of St. Alkmund's, Whitchurch. In Transactions of the Shropshire Archæological and Natural History Society, viii. 413–440, 1885. (An interesting article dealing with the exhumation of Talbot's bones and the evidence derived from them concerning the manner of his death.)
W. G. Boswell-Stone: Shakspere's Holinshed, ix. 205–242, 1896.
​J. B. Henneman: The Episodes in Shakespeare's I. Henry VI. In Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, xv. 290–320, 1900. (An admirable article.)
Sir A. T. Quiller-Couch: Historical Tales from Shakespeare, 257-276, 1912.
H. D. Gray: The Purport of Shakespeare's Contribution to 1 Henry VI. In Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, xxxii. 367-382, 1917.
The most elaborate edition of the play is that of H. C. Hart (Arden Shakespeare, Methuen, 1909. Considerable philological erudition is here vitiated by unsound judgment). Other helpful editions are W. J. Rolfe's (1882); Frank A. Marshall's in vol. i of the Henry Irving Shakespeare (1888), containing important introduction and notes; and that in the New Grant White Shakespeare, vol. vi (Little, Brown & Co., 1912).
Students of the play will find it interesting to compare the treatment of Joan of Arc and Talbot with the presentation of the same figures in Voltaire's travesty, La Pucelle d'Orléans (first authorized edition, 1762), and in Schiller's ultra-romantic Jungfrau von Orleans (1801).
Much important information regarding Sir John Fastolfe and a number of letters written by him will be found in the first volume of Gairdner's edition of the Paston Letters (1872). See also Gairdner, The Historical Element in Shakespeare's Falstaff in Studies in English History, 55-77, 1881; and L. W. Vernon Harcourt, The Two Sir John Fastolfs in Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 1910, 47-62. The latter attempts, on interesting but not very convincing evidence, to identify Falstaff with a somewhat older and obscurer namesake of the Fastolfe of 1 Henry VI.
# Henry VI Part 1 (1918) Yale/Text

Layout 2
The First Part of Henry the Sixth
* Act I
* Act II
* Act III
* Act IV
* Act V
[DRAMATIS PERSONÆ
King Henry the Sixth
Duke of Bedford, Uncle to the King, Regent of France
Duke of Gloucester, Uncle to the King, and Protector
| Duke of Exeter, | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | Great-Uncles to the King |
| Bishop of Winchester, | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | Great-Uncles to the King |
Richard Plantagenet, Son of Richard, late Earl of Cambridge; afterwards Duke of York
Duke of Somerset
Earl of Warwick
Earl of Salisbury
Earl of Suffolk
Lord Talbot, afterwards Earl of Shrewsbury
John Talbot, his Son
Edmund Mortimer, Earl of March
Sir John Fastolfe
Sir William Glansdale
Sir Thomas Gargrave
Sir William Lucy
Vernon, of the White-Rose, or York, Faction
Basset, of the Red-Rose, or Lancaster, Faction
Woodvile, Lieutenant of the Tower
Mayor of London
A Lawyer of the Temple
Lords, Warders of the Tower ' Mortimer's Keepers, Heralds, Officers, Soldiers, Messengers, and Attendants
Charles, Dauphin of France (legitimately, King Charles VII)
Reignier, Duke of Anjou, and titular King of Naples
Duke of Alençon
Bastard of Orleans
Governor of Paris
General of the French Forces in Bordeaux
Master-Gunner of Orleans, and his Son
An old Shepherd, Father to Joan la Pucelle
Margaret, Daughter to Reignier
Countess of Auvergne
Joan la Pucelle, Commonly called Joan of Arc
French Herald, Sergeant, and Sentinels; Porter to the Countess of Auvergne; Fiends appearing to La Pucelle
Scene: London and Westminster; various parts of France.]
# Hockey: Canada's Royal Winter Game/The Victoria Hockey Club of Winnipeg

VICTORIA HOCKEY CLUB, WINNIPEG, 1899.
VICTORIA HOCKEY CLUB, WINNIPEG.
THIS club was organized in 1889 and has a unique record, for it has held the championship of its respective league,—Manitoba and N. W. T.—ever since its formation. In 1895–6, the Winnipeg Victorias won the Stanley Cup in Montreal, defeating the Victorias of that City, but lost it to the same team, in Winnipeg, the following season. They are a well balanced aggregation, and are perhaps the best stick handlers and combination players in the world. Their appearance in Montreal draws ten thousand spectators to the Arena Hockey Rink.
# Hockey: Canada's Royal Winter Game/The Wanderers Hockey Club of Halifax

THE WANDERERS OF HALIFAX
WERE organized into a club in 1882. They have twice won the handsome trophy donated by the Starr Mfg. Co., of Dartmouth, N. S., representing the championship of Halifax. Last year they won the championship of the Maritime Provinces.
Their rivals in the east are the Crescents, of Halifax, whose scientific play deserves special mention.
These two teams would do much to further spread the popularity of hockey by competing away from home with the western sevens.
# Hockey: Canada's Royal Winter Game/The Toronto Varsity Hockey Club of Toronto

TORONTO 'VARSITY HOCKEY CLUB, 1899.
TORONTO 'VARSITY CLUB
HAS the strongest team in the Queen City. Last year the college boys won the city championship, which redounds greatly to their credit as Toronto is the hockey centre of Ontario and has several very strong teams.
# Hockey: Canada's Royal Winter Game/The Victorias of Montreal in 1881

VICTORIAS OF MONTREAL
TAKEN IN QUEBEC IN 1881.
# Hockey: Canada's Royal Winter Game/The Victoria Hockey Club of Montreal

THE VICTORIAS OF MONTREAL.
THE Victorias, with the McGill College team, are the pioneers of hockey, and to them is due much of the credit of developing the game into a science, because it was they who were instrumental in drawing up the first Code of Rules.
They held the championship of the A.H.A. of C. from 1894 to 1899, and the "Stanley" Cup for four years out of the seven during which it was offered for competition.
They have traveled more and are perhaps better known throughout Canada and the United States than any other team.
# Hodge Drive-It-Yourself Company v. City of Cincinnati

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
284 U.S. 335
Hodge Drive-It-Yourself Company v. City of Cincinnati
Argued: Nov. 30, 1931. --- Decided: Jan 4, 1932
Mr. Julius R. Samuels, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for
appellants.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Harper's Weekly/Mr. Schurz in Germany

From Harper's Weekly, May 12, 1888, p. 331.
MR. SCHURZ IN GERMANY.
The banquet to Mr. Schurz in Berlin was an honorable tribute to a distinguished American citizen of German birth, who, as true now as ever to the republican principles which he brought to his chosen country, is perfectly just to the greatness and to the modern progress of his native land. His speeeh upon the late German Emperor showed the generous catholicity of his political view, as his speeches always show a wise and comprehensive grasp of great principles, and try men and parties by their fidelity to such principles.
Mr. Schurz's career in this country has illustrated both the power and the penalty of political independence. There is no man who has been more bitterly denounced by party spirit. But there are few men in either of the great parties who rival him in sound political thinking, or who exercise so deep and strong an influence upon the political action of intelligent and patriotic young Americans. Mr. Schurz is peculiarly a public man, however his resolute independence may interfere with party relations, and that a man thrown out of such relations, yet with unabated interest in public affairs, still maintains his moral ascendancy in politics, is one of the happy signs of the times.
Perhaps the best illustration of Mr. Schurz's political perception and sense of justice as well as of his signal ability, is his biography of Henry Clay, which seems to us to be the best of our political biographies, as it is by far the best general and brief manual of American politics for the first half of this century. Its breadth, candor, acuteness, and intelligence are delightful, and the work, like all such works when well done, is a public service. There is probably many an old Henry Clay Whig, now become a Republican, who heartily dislikes Mr. Schurz, but who would find in his story of Clay a more sympathetic and complete comprehension of him than has yet been shown.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Harper's Weekly/Mr. Schurz in Ohio

From Harper's Weekly, October 4, 1884, p. 649.
MR. SCHURZ IN OHIO.
Mr. Schurz's speeches in the West have been heard by thousands of persons, and every speech has been a calm, earnest, and convincing presentation of the true issue of the campaign. He does not attack or defend either the Republican or the Democratic party. He simply shows, and with masterly clearness, that to vote for Mr. Blaine is to vote for a trafficker in official influence, and to vote for Mr. Cleveland is to support a brave and incorruptible public officer for the Presidency. Mr. Schurz speaks both in English and German, and the impression and effect of his strong and temperate appeals to the intelligence and patriotism of the West are very great.
He is assailed, of course, with the most reckless falsehoods. Among them is the assertion that he is largely paid for his speeches by Democratic committee. There is no more reason that a political speaker should give his time and services gratuitously than a political editor, and very generous offers of remuneration are often made. But Mr. Schurz is not paid. A correspondent of the New York Times says:
   “Mr. Schurz was asked if he had seen the statement that he is receiving $250 a speech from the Democratic managers. ‘Yes,’ was his reply; ‘I have noticed that such a story is being circulated. The Springfield Republican says the story was invented by McCullogh, of the St. Louis Globe-Democrat. The facts are that I am not receiving one cent from any source for my speeches in the contest, and that I am paying all my own travelling expenses. I am simply doing what I consider my imperative duty — warning the people against turning over the administration of the national government to a self-convicted corrupt man. I can not think they will do it.’”
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Harper's Weekly/Mr. Schurz's Speech 3

From Harper's Weekly, November 1, 1890, p. 843. See also Carl Schurz's speech, The Tariff Question.
MR. SCHURZ'S SPEECH.
Mr. Schurz's late speech before the Massachusetts Reform Club on the present aspects of public affairs, especially the question of the tariff, was one of those masterly generalizations which sum up whole debates and fix attention upon the essential points of controversy. The lucidity of the orator's perception, his comprehensive intelligence, his condor of statement, intellectual rectitude, and moral force, make one of his important speeches a public event. This campaign has been peculiarly interesting and prolific in addresses by eminent public men, but there has been none which appeals to the public mind with more incisive ability, directness, and fairness than this of Mr. Schurz.
In another way, also, the speech is very interesting. It expresses characteristically and satisfactorily the general view of a very large body of American citizens who are profoundly interested in public affairs, but who are not dragged at the wheels of party. They are, in fact, the tribunal to which all party orators appeal. When members of Congress and party orators speak of appealing to the country and invoking the verdict of the people, they do not mean people who vote according to the label of the package, but according to its contents. They mean those who do not vote as a party bids, but as their own judgment approves.
Mr. Schurz's audience is very large, because there are a great many such Americans. They are in parties, indeed, as well as out of them, and they ultimately decide elections. Even if they do not always agree with every view expressed by the orator, they agree wholly with the patriotism, the essential democracy, the wise, practical Americanism of his tone. But agreement with this speech will be very general. No recent address seems to us to present so well the true American view of the questions which it treats. It is a speech to affect opinion, and when Mr. Schurz had taken his seat, the Reform Club instantly and unanimously resolved to print it for the widest popular circulation.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Harper's Weekly/Mr. Schurz Commended

From Harper's Weekly, October 20, 1900, p. 980.
WE have had so much to say of late in criticism of Mr. Schurz and his recent conduct that it is a pleasure to set down a word of commendation for an act of positive self-sacrifice in behalf of the public weal. Mr. Schurz's resignation of the Presidency of the National Civil Service Reform Mr. Schurz commended League is the best evidence, if any were needed, of his interest in the welfare of that organization, as well as of the principles for which it stands. Any one who supposes that it was an easy thing for Mr. Schurz to do when he wrote his letter of resignation would better study the story of Brutus, who condemned his own son to death, and draw a parallel. If there has been one thing in the universe beside his temperament to which Mr. Schurz has been consistently true it is the principle of Civil Service Reform. Whether allied to the Republican party or to the Democratic, whether on the crest of the wave of success or struggling in the undertow of defeat, in the face of scorn, contempt, ridicule, in fair weather as well as in foul, he has been its ardent champion, suffering such slings and arrows of outrageous fortune in its behalf as would have overwhelmed most other men, never for once yielding up a jot of his devotion to it. He has lived it, dreamed it, breathed it — it has been the very soul of his political soul, and now be bows his head in sorrow and bids it farewell. It must be said that the nation owes a great debt to Mr. Schurz for his insistence upon its principles. It must not be forgotten in summing up the substance of Mr. Schurz's career that he, with the late Dorman B. Eaton and George William Curtis, of cherished memory, more than any other men, forced its principles into the warp and woof of our public life, and the deep gratitude which is owed to him, as well as to them, must not be withheld because in his latter days he has chosen to abandon the field in which he has shone conspicuously as a patriot, in behalf of an issue which in the days of his intellectual vigor he would have been the first to make mock of.
It is an encouraging sign to those of us who have despaired over the case of this good man gone wrong that he so fully realizes the enormity of his present course that be withdraws himself from active contact with an association which his new alliance would cover with real shame and contempt. It does not mean the complete abandonment of righteous principles by Mr. Schurz, as some are unkind enough to suggest. We prefer to believe it the first step of the late President of the League toward that reformation for which his best friends have been praying, the initial point of which is the realization by the offender of his own unworthiness.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Harper's Weekly/Mr. Schurz Upon the Emperor William

From Harper's Weekly, March 31, 1888, p. 223. See also the translation of Carl Schurz's eulogy, Kaiser Wilhelm I.
MR. SCHURZ UPON THE EMPEROR WILLIAM.
The career of the late Emperor of Germany will be nowhere more impressively and wisely interpreted than by Carl Schurz at the great memorial meeting of Germans in New York. Among distinguished men of German birth no one represents more signally than Mr. Schurz the political sympathies and views which are radically opposed to those of the Emperor William. His fidelity to them as a youth brought him in danger of his life in Germany, and led him to adopt America as his home, and as William was the genius of the German despotism of forty years ago, no tribute to him could have the peculiar interest which attended that of Mr. Schurz.
His address is an admirable illustration of his keen political insight, his judicial mind, his candor, his historic instinct, and his comprehensive intelligence. He said that the audience had assembled as American citizens, but with a natural pride and tender interest in the land of their birth. They were of all political views which sympathies, and he himself was among those whom the Emperor had driven from their native country. Mr. Schurz pointed out at once the secret of the universal German feeling for the Emperor in the fact that under his reign, fulfilling the ardent hope of heroic generations, Germany had ceased to be a name, and had become a nation. The figure of William therefore will stand “in dim mythical splendor” with that of Barbarossa. Already before his death he was a national hero and his past was forgotten in the fond pride of Germans in a united Germany.
Mr. Schurz felicitously characterized Wilhelm, not as a man of genius, but of supreme tact to perceive and to turn to the best account the genius of others. As a youth William saw Prussia overwhelmed by a state which was the product of revolutionary ideas. The only national salvation lay in the army under unlimited royal power as the adversary of the revolution. He accepted a Constitution only as the guarantee of absolute royal power, but power not for tyranny or self-indulgence, but for the benefit of the people. To this use of power, as he conceived it, he devoted himself like a day-laborer. His army was immense. It was a people in arms, and for that reason Germany is the peace-watch of Europe. The orator's allusion's to the present Emperor were full of feeling and hope. No sketch of his address can do it any justice. But it was another illustration of the very great ability of a man who, amid the passions of our politics, as in those of an earlier day in Germany, maintains the independence and courage and fidelity to conscience which are the real bulwarks of the republic.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# History of Oregon (Bancroft)/Volume 2

or Volume XXX of History of the Pacific States of North America
This volume and several others from the Pacific States series was originally attributed to Hubert Howe Bancroft, but were in fact written Frances Fuller Victor. See "The Origin and Authorship of the Bancroft Pacific States Publications" from the Oregon Historical Quarterly, Vol. 4.
THE WORKS
OF
HUBERT HOWE BANCROFT
THE WORKS
OF
HUBERT HOWE BANCROFT
VOLUME XXX
HISTORY OF OREGON
Vol. II. 1848–1888
SAN FRANCISCO
THE HISTORY COMPANY, PUBLISHERS
1888
Entered according to Act of Congress in the Year 1888, by
HUBERT H. BANCROFT,
In the Office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington.
All Rights Reserved.
CONTENTS OF THIS VOLUME.
CHAPTER I.
CONDITION OF AFFAIRS.
1848.
CHAPTER II.
EFFECT OF THE CALIFORNIA GOLD DISCOVERY.
1848–1849.
CHAPTER III.
LANE'S ADMINISTRATION.
1849–1850.
CHAPTER IV.
A DELEGATE TO CONGRESS.
1849–1850.
CHAPTER V.
ADMINISTRATION OF GAINES.
1850–1852.
CHAPTER VI.
DISCOVERY OF GOLD IN OREGON.
1850–1852.
CHAPTER VII.
INDIAN AFFAIRS.
1851.
CHAPTER VIII.
PLAUSIBLE PACIFICATION.
1851–1852.
CHAPTER IX.
SURVEYS AND TOWN-MAKING.
1851–1853.
CHAPTER X.
LAND LAWS AND LAND TITLES.
1851–1855.
CHAPTER XI.
POLITICS AND PROGRESS.
1853.
CHAPTER XII.
ROGUE RIVER WAR.
1853–1854.
CHAPTER XIII.
LEGISLATION, MINING, AND SETTLEMENT.
1853–1854.
CHAPTER XIV.
GOVERNMENT AND GENERAL DEVELOPMENT.
1854–1855.
CHAPTER XV.
FURTHER INDIAN WARS.
1855–1856.
CHAPTER XVI.
EXTERMINATION OF THE INDIANS.
1856–1857.
CHAPTER XVII.
OREGON BECOMES A STATE.
1856–1859.
CHAPTER XVIII.
POLITICS AND PATRIOTISM.
1859–1861.
CHAPTER XIX.
WAR AND DEVELOPMENT.
1858–1862.
CHAPTER XX.
MILITARY ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS.
1861–1865.
CHAPTER XXI.
THE SHOSHONE WAR.
1866–1868.
CHAPTER XXII.
THE MODOC WAR.
1864–1873.
CHAPTER XXIII.
POLITICAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL.
1862–1887.
CHAPTER XXIV.
LATER EVENTS.
1887–1888.
# Hobomok

A Tale of Early Times — The story of the interracial marriage of the Puritan Mary Conant and the Native American Hobomok. Published in 1824.
   * Title page
   * Preface
   * Chapter I
   * Chapter II
   * Chapter III
   * Chapter IV
   * Chapter V
   * Chapter VI
   * Chapter VII
   * Chapter VIII
   * Chapter IX
   * Chapter X
   * Chapter XI
   * Chapter XII
   * Chapter XIII
   * Chapter XIV
   * Chapter XV
   * Chapter XVI
   * Chapter XVII
   * Chapter XVIII
   * Chapter XIX
   * Chapter XX
# Hahn v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
107 U.S. 402
Hahn v. United States
H. E. Paine, for appellant.
Sol. Gen. Phillips, for appellee.
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hahn v. Ross Island Sand & Gravel Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
358 U.S. 272
Hahn v. Ross Island Sand & Gravel Company
Argued: Dec. 11, 1958. --- Decided: Jan 12, 1959
See 359 U.S. 921, 79 S.Ct. 577.
Mr. Dwight L. Schwab, Portland Or., for the petitioner.
Mr. Ray H. Lafky, Salem, Or., for the State of Oregon, as amicus curiae.
Mr. Arno H. Denecke, Portland, Or., for the respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# History of Iowa From the Earliest Times to the Beginning of the Twentieth Century/3

* Title page
* Copyright notice
* Table of Contents
* List of Illustrations
* Preface
* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
* Chapter VII
* Chapter VIII
* Chapter IX
* Chapter X
* Chapter XI
* Chapter XII
* Chapter XIII
* Chapter XIV
* Chapter XV
* Chapter XVI
* Early History of Iowa Counties
* Directory of Public Officials