OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/18th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 52

Chap. LII.—An Act confirming the act of the legislature of Virginia, entitled “An act incorporating the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company,” and “An act of the state of Maryland, confirming the same.”
The act of the legislature of Virginia incorporating the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company, ratified, &c. to a certain extent.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the act of the legislature of the state of Virginia, entitled “An act incorporating the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company,” be and the same is hereby ratified and confirmed, so far as may be necessary for the purpose of enabling any company that may hereafter be formed by the authority of said act of incorporation, to carry into effect the provisions thereof, in the District of Columbia, within the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States, and no further.
Should the state of Virginia or Maryland desire, at any time, to avail itself of the right secured to it by the twenty-first section of the act aforesaid, the President is to depute three skilful commissioners of the United States’ corps of engineers to examine the route of said canal.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That, should the state of Virginia or Maryland desire, at any time, to avail itself of the right secured to it, by the twenty-first section of the act aforesaid, to take and continue a canal, from any point of the Chesapeake and Ohio canal, to any other point within the territory of the District of Columbia, or through the same, on application of the President of the United States, by the executive of the state, the President is authorized and empowered to depute three skilful commissioners of the United States’ corps of engineers, to survey and examine so much of the route of such canal, as may effect, in any manner, the navigation of the Chesapeake and Ohio canal. The said commissioners, or a majority of them, shall ascertain, as far as practicable, whether the canal proposed to be constructed by the state aforesaid, will injure or impede the navigation of the Chesapeake ​and Ohio canal, and report to the President of the United States the facts and reasons on which they may ground their judgment thereupon; which report shall be submitted to the Congress of the United States, at their session next ensuing the date thereof for their decision thereon; and if Congress shall be of opinion that the said canal may be cut in the manner proposed, as aforesaid, without impeding or injuring the navigation of the Chesapeake and Ohio canal, the same shall be conclusive thereon.
Approved, March 3, 1825.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/18th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 57

Chap. LVII.—An Act making appropriation to satisfy certain balances due to the commissioners and secretaries of land claims in Florida.
3386 dollars five cents appropriated to satisfy certain balances due to the commissioners of land claims in Florida and their secretaries, prior to Dec. 31, 1824.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That there be and hereby is, appropriated out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated, the sum of three thousand three hundred and eighty-six dollars and five cents, to satisfy certain balances due to the commissioners of land claims in Florida, and their several secretaries, prior to the thirty-first day of December, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-four.
Approved, March 3, 1825.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/18th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 50

Chap. L.—An Act to authorize the President of the United States to cause a road to be marked out from the western frontier of Missouri, to the confines of New Mexico.
The President of the United States to appoint commissioners to mark out a road from the western frontier of Missouri to the confines of New Mexico. Proviso.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be, and he hereby is, authorized to appoint commissioners to mark out a road from the western frontier of the state of Missouri, to the boundary line of the United States, in the direction of Santa Fe, of New Mexico: Provided, That the said commissioners shall first obtain the consent of the intervening tribes of Indians, by treaty, to the marking of the said road, and to the unmolested use thereof to the citizens of the United States, and of the Mexican republic.
Continuation of said road.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the President of the United States be, and he hereby is, authorized to cause the marking of the said road to be continued from the boundary line of the United States to the frontier of New Mexico, under such regulations as may be agreed upon ​for that purpose between the executive of the United States, and the Mexican government.
10,000 dollars appropriated to defray the expenses of said road; and 20,000 dollars to treat with the Indians.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That the sum of ten thousand dollars be, and the same hereby is, appropriated, to defray the expenses of marking the said road; and the further sum of twenty thousand dollars, to defray the expenses of treating with the Indians, for their consent to the establishment and use thereof; the said sums to be paid out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, March 3, 1825.
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 189

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted by the Security Council at its 1126th meeting, unanimously, on 4 June 1964
The Security Council,
Considering the complaint by the Royal Government of Cambodia in document S/5697,
Noting the statements made in the Council in regard to this complaint,
Noting with regret the incidents which have occurred on Cambodian territory and the existing situation on the Cambodian-Viet-Namese frontier,
Taking note of the apologies and regrets tendered to the Royal Government of Cambodia in regard to these incidents and the loss of life they have entailed,
Noting also the desire of the Governments of the Kingdom of Cambodia and the Republic of Viet-Nam to succeed in restoring their relations to a peaceful and normal state,
1. Deplores the incidents caused by the penetration of units of the Army of the Republic of Viet-Nam into Cambodian territory;
2. Requests that just and fair compensation should be offered to the Royal Government of Cambodia;
3. Invites those responsible to take all appropriate measures to prevent any further violation of the Cambodian frontier;
4. Requests all States and authorities, and in particular the members o the Geneva Conference, to recognize and respect Cambodia's neutrality and territorial integrity;
5. Decides to send three of its members to the two countries and to the places where the most recent incidents have occurred, in order to consider such measures as may prevent any recurrence of such incidents: they will report to the Security Council within forty-five days.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Reports/Volume 425

* 425 U.S. 1 (1976) Abbott Laboratories v. Portland Retail Druggists Association, Inc.
* 425 U.S. 25 (1976) Middendorf v. Henry
* 425 U.S. 73 (1976) Carey v. Sugar Curtis Circulation Company
* 425 U.S. 80 (1976) Geders v. United States
* 425 U.S. 94 (1976) Goldberg v. United States
* 425 U.S. 130 (1976) Beer v. United States
* 425 U.S. 164 (1976) United States v. United Continental Tuna Corporation
* 425 U.S. 185 (1976) Ernst v. Hochfelder
* 425 U.S. 219 (1976) Dann v. Johnston
* 425 U.S. 231 (1976) Youakim v. Miller
* 425 U.S. 238 (1976) Kelley v. Johnson
* 425 U.S. 257 (1976) Ohio v. Gallagher
* 425 U.S. 262 (1976) Butler v. Dexter
* 425 U.S. 268 (1976) Diamond National Corporation v. State Board of Equalization
* 425 U.S. 273 (1976) Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc.
* 425 U.S. 284 (1976) Hills v. Gautreaux
* 425 U.S. 308 (1976) Baxter v. Palmigiano
* 425 U.S. 341 (1976) Beckwith v. United States
* 425 U.S. 352 (1976) Department of Air Force v. Rose
* 425 U.S. 391 (1976) Fisher v. United States (425 U.S. 391)
* 425 U.S. 435 (1976) United States v. Miller (425 U.S. 435)
* 425 U.S. 457 (1976) New York Civil Service Commission v. Snead
* 425 U.S. 460 (1976) National Bank of North America v. Associates of Obstetrics and Female Surgery, Inc.
* 425 U.S. 463 (1976) Moe v. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of Flathead Reservation
* 425 U.S. 484 (1976) Hampton v. United States
* 425 U.S. 501 (1976) Estelle v. Williams
* 425 U.S. 536 (1976) Francis v. Henderson
* 425 U.S. 559 (1976) Drew Municipal Separate School District v. Andrews
* 425 U.S. 560 (1976) Quinn v. Muscare
* 425 U.S. 564 (1976) United States v. Mandujano
* 425 U.S. 610 (1976) Hynes v. Mayor and Council of Borough of Oradell
* 425 U.S. 637 (1976) American Motorists Insurance Company v. Starnes
* 425 U.S. 649 (1976) Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. Hollowbreast
* 425 U.S. 662 (1976) National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. Federal Power Commission
* 425 U.S. 675 (1976) Connor v. Coleman
* 425 U.S. 682 (1976) Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba
* 425 U.S. 738 (1976) Hospital Building Company v. Trustees of Rex Hospital
* 425 U.S. 748 (1976) Virginia State Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council
* 425 U.S. 791 (1976) United States v. Florida
* 425 U.S. 794 (1976) Arizona v. New Mexico
* 425 U.S. 800 (1976) South Prairie Construction Company v. Local No. 627, International Union of Operating Engineers
* 425 U.S. 807 (1976) United States v. Orleans
* 425 U.S. 820 (1976) Brown v. General Services Administration
* 425 U.S. 840 (1976) Chandler v. Roudebush
* 425 U.S. 917 (1976) Scott v. United States (425 U.S. 917)
* 425 U.S. 963 (1976) Liles v. Oregon
* 425 U.S. 982 (1976) Matheny v. Alabama
* 425 U.S. 998 (1976) Slepicoff v. United States
# United States Reports/Volume 426

* 426 U.S. 1 (1976) Train v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc.
* 426 U.S. 26 (1976) Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization
* 426 U.S. 67 (1976) Mathews v. Diaz
* 426 U.S. 88 (1976) Hampton v. Mow Sun Wong
* 426 U.S. 128 (1976) Cappaert v. United States
* 426 U.S. 148 (1976) Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Company
* 426 U.S. 167 (1976) Hancock v. Train
* 426 U.S. 200 (1976) Environmental Protection Agency v. California State Water Resources Control Board
* 426 U.S. 229 (1976) Washington v. Davis
* 426 U.S. 271 (1976) Federal Power Commission v. Conway Corporation
* 426 U.S. 283 (1976) City of Charlotte v. Local 660, International Association of Firefighters
* 426 U.S. 290 (1976) Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.
* 426 U.S. 310 (1976) Omaha National Bank v. Nebraskans for Independent Banking, Inc.
* 426 U.S. 312 (1976) Tennessee v. Dunlap
* 426 U.S. 317 (1976) United States v. Maccollom
* 426 U.S. 341 (1976) Bishop v. Wood
* 426 U.S. 363 (1976) New Hampshire v. Maine
* 426 U.S. 373 (1976) Bryan v. Itasca County
* 426 U.S. 394 (1976) Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California
* 426 U.S. 407 (1976) Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union v. Mobil Oil Corporation
* 426 U.S. 438 (1976) TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.
* 426 U.S. 465 (1976) Texas v. Louisiana
* 426 U.S. 471 (1976) Burrell v. McCray
* 426 U.S. 476 (1976) Ralston Purina Company v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company
* 426 U.S. 479 (1976) Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Ludwig
* 426 U.S. 482 (1976) Hortonville Joint School District No. 1 v. Hortonville Education Association
* 426 U.S. 500 (1976) United States v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company (426 U.S. 500)
* 426 U.S. 529 (1976) Kleppe v. New Mexico
* 426 U.S. 548 (1976) Federal Energy Administration v. Algonquin SNG, Inc.
* 426 U.S. 572 (1976) Examining Board of Engineers, Architects and Surveyors v. Flores de Otero
* 426 U.S. 610 (1976) Doyle v. Ohio
* 426 U.S. 637 (1976) Henderson v. Morgan
* 426 U.S. 660 (1976) Pennsylvania v. New Jersey
* 426 U.S. 668 (1976) City of Eastlake v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.
* 426 U.S. 696 (1976) Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for the United States of America and Canada v. Milivojevich
* 426 U.S. 736 (1976) Roemer v. Board of Public Works of Maryland
* 426 U.S. 776 (1976) Flint Ridge Development Company v. Scenic Rivers Association of Oklahoma
* 426 U.S. 794 (1976) Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corporation
* 426 U.S. 833 (1976) National League of Cities v. Usery
* 426 U.S. 913 (1976) Film Follies, Inc. v. Haas
* 426 U.S. 925 (1976) Estelle v. Justice
* 426 U.S. 955 (1976) Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc.
# United States Reports/Volume 422

* 422 U.S. 1 (1975) Intercounty Construction Corporation v. Walter
* 422 U.S. 13 (1975) United States v. Louisiana (422 U.S. 13)
* 422 U.S. 35 (1975) Rogers v. United States (422 U.S. 35)
* 422 U.S. 49 (1975) Rondeau v. Mosinee Paper Corporation
* 422 U.S. 66 (1975) Cort v. Ash
* 422 U.S. 86 (1975) United States v. Citizens & Southern National Bank
* 422 U.S. 151 (1975) Twentieth Century Music Corporation v. Aiken
* 422 U.S. 171 (1975) United States v. Hale
* 422 U.S. 184 (1975) United States v. Alaska (422 U.S. 184)
* 422 U.S. 205 (1975) Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville
* 422 U.S. 225 (1975) United States v. Nobles
* 422 U.S. 255 (1975) Federal Aviation Administration v. Robertson
* 422 U.S. 271 (1975) United States v. American Building Maintenance Industries
* 422 U.S. 289 (1975) Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Company v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures
* 422 U.S. 332 (1975) Hicks v. Miranda
* 422 U.S. 358 (1975) City of Richmond v. United States
* 422 U.S. 395 (1975) Preiser v. Newkirk
* 422 U.S. 405 (1975) Albemarle Paper Company v. Moody
* 422 U.S. 454 (1975) Muniz v. Hoffman
* 422 U.S. 490 (1975) Warth v. Seldin
* 422 U.S. 531 (1975) United States v. Peltier
* 422 U.S. 563 (1975) O'Connor v. Donaldson
* 422 U.S. 590 (1975) Brown v. Illinois
* 422 U.S. 617 (1975) Ivan Allen Company v. United States
* 422 U.S. 659 (1975) Gordon v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
* 422 U.S. 694 (1975) United States v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
* 422 U.S. 749 (1975) Weinberger v. Salfi
* 422 U.S. 806 (1975) Faretta v. California
* 422 U.S. 853 (1975) Herring v. New York
* 422 U.S. 873 (1975) United States v. Brignoni-Ponce
* 422 U.S. 891 (1975) United States v. Ortiz (422 U.S. 891)
* 422 U.S. 916 (1975) Bowen v. United States
* 422 U.S. 922 (1975) Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc.
* 422 U.S. 935 (1975) White v. Regester
* 422 U.S. 937 (1975) Hill v. Printing Industries of Gulf Coast
* 422 U.S. 1012 (1975) Watson v. Kenlick Coal Company, Inc.
* 422 U.S. 1020 (1975) Carter v. United States
* 422 U.S. 1022 (1975) Womack v. United States
* 422 U.S. 1024 (1975) Miller v. United States (422 U.S. 1024)
* 422 U.S. 1032 (1975) Watts v. United States (422 U.S. 1032)
# United States Reports/Volume 424

* 424 U.S. 1 (1976) Buckley v. Valeo
* 424 U.S. 295 (1976) Alamo Land Cattle Company Inc. v. Arizona
* 424 U.S. 319 (1976) Mathews v. Eldridge
* 424 U.S. 351 (1976) De Canas v. Bica
* 424 U.S. 366 (1976) Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. v. Cottrell
* 424 U.S. 382 (1976) Fisher v. District Court of Sixteenth Judicial District of Montana, in and for the County of Rosebud
* 424 U.S. 392 (1976) United States v. Testan
* 424 U.S. 409 (1976) Imbler v. Pachtman
* 424 U.S. 448 (1976) Time, Inc. v. Firestone
* 424 U.S. 494 (1976) Federal Power Commission v. Moss
* 424 U.S. 507 (1976) Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board
* 424 U.S. 544 (1976) United States v. Gaddis
* 424 U.S. 554 (1976) Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.
* 424 U.S. 577 (1976) Lavine v. Milne
* 424 U.S. 589 (1976) Ristaino v. Ross
* 424 U.S. 600 (1976) United States v. Dinitz
* 424 U.S. 614 (1976) Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Shapiro
* 424 U.S. 636 (1976) East Carroll Parish School Board v. Marshall
* 424 U.S. 641 (1976) Bucolo v. Adkins
* 424 U.S. 645 (1976) McCarthy v. Philadelphia Civil Service Commission
* 424 U.S. 648 (1976) Garner v. United States
* 424 U.S. 669 (1976) McKinney v. Alabama
* 424 U.S. 693 (1976) Paul v. Davis
* 424 U.S. 737 (1976) Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Wetzel
* 424 U.S. 747 (1976) Franks v. Bowman Transportation Company, Inc.
* 424 U.S. 800 (1976) Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States
* 424 U.S. 828 (1976) Greer v. Spock
* 424 U.S. 929 (1976) Danley v. United States
* 424 U.S. 931 (1976) Sanders v. Georgia
* 424 U.S. 947 (1976) Coughlin v. Stachulak
* 424 U.S. 1301 (1976) Coleman v. Paccar, Inc.
* 424 U.S. 1309 (1976) Bradley v. Lunding
* 424 U.S. 1313 (1976) Flamm v. Real-Blt, Inc.
# United States Reports/Volume 42

1 How.[ard], ( 11 L.Ed. )
* 42 U.S. 1 Williams v. Ash
* 42 U.S. 14 Hammond v. Lewis
* 42 U.S. 24 (1816) United States v. Acosta
* 42 U.S. 28 Smith v. Condry
* 42 U.S. 37 Lessee of Mercer v. Selden
* 42 U.S. 56 (1807) Buchannon v. Upshaw
* 42 U.S. 89 Strout v. Foster
* 42 U.S. 95 (1824) City of Mobile v. Emanuel
* 42 U.S. 104 (1836) United States v. Linn (42 U.S. 104)
* 42 U.S. 118 Morris v. Nixon
* 42 U.S. 134 Bank of the United States v. Beverly
* 42 U.S. 153 Lloyd v. Hough
* 42 U.S. 161 McKnight v. Taylor's Trustee
* 42 U.S. 169 (1831) Bell v. Bruen
* 42 U.S. 188 Cartwright v. Howe
* 42 U.S. 189 Bowman v. Wathen
* 42 U.S. 197 Ellis v. Jones Administrator of Taylor
* 42 U.S. 202 McClurg v. Kingsland
* 42 U.S. 211 (1838) Connor v. Bradley
* 42 U.S. 219 Lessee of Jewell v. Jewell
* 42 U.S. 234 Bank of the Metropolis v. New England Bank
* 42 U.S. 241 McKenna v. Fisk
* 42 U.S. 250 (1817) United States v. Irving
* 42 U.S. 265 (1802) Nelson v. Carland
* 42 U.S. 281 In re Castleman
* 42 U.S. 282 Taylor v. Savage
* 42 U.S. 287 (1839) Minor v. Tillotson (42 U.S. 287)
* 42 U.S. 289 Todd v. Daniell
* 42 U.S. 290 (1823) Williams v. United States
* 42 U.S. 301 Duncan v. Darst
* 42 U.S. 311 (1841) Bronson v. Kinzie
# United States Reports/Volume 420

* 420 U.S. 1 (1975) Chapman v. Meier
* 420 U.S. 28 (1975) Test v. United States
* 420 U.S. 31 (1975) Daniel v. Louisiana
* 420 U.S. 35 (1975) Train v. City of New York
* 420 U.S. 50 (1975) Emporium Capwell Company v. Western Addition Community Organization
* 420 U.S. 77 (1975) Harris County Commissioners Court v. Moore
* 420 U.S. 92 (1975) Foster v. Dravo Corporation
* 420 U.S. 103 (1975) Gerstein v. Pugh
* 420 U.S. 128 (1975) Board of School Commissioners of the City of Indianapolis v. Jacobs
* 420 U.S. 136 (1975) Train v. Campaign Clean Water, Inc.
* 420 U.S. 139 (1975) Lee v. Thornton
* 420 U.S. 141 (1975) United States v. Bisceglia
* 420 U.S. 162 (1975) Drope v. Missouri
* 420 U.S. 184 (1975) Interstate Commerce Commission v. Oregon Pacific Industries, Inc.
* 420 U.S. 194 (1975) Antoine v. Washington
* 420 U.S. 251 (1975) National Labor Relations Board v. J. Weingarten, Inc.
* 420 U.S. 276 (1975) International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Upper South Department v. Quality Manufacturing Company
* 420 U.S. 283 (1975) Lefkowitz v. Newsome
* 420 U.S. 304 (1975) Utah v. United States (420 U.S. 304)
* 420 U.S. 307 (1975) Roe v. Doe
* 420 U.S. 308 (1975) Wood v. Strickland
* 420 U.S. 332 (1975) United States v. Wilson (420 U.S. 332)
* 420 U.S. 358 (1975) United States v. Jenkins
* 420 U.S. 371 (1975) United States v. New Jersey State Lottery Commission
* 420 U.S. 376 (1975) Williams Wilkins Company v. United States
* 420 U.S. 377 (1975) Serfass v. United States
* 420 U.S. 395 (1975) Chemehuevi Tribe of Indians v. Federal Power Commission
* 420 U.S. 425 (1975) Cheryl Spider Decoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial District
* 420 U.S. 469 (1975) Cox Broadcasting Corporation v. Cohn
* 420 U.S. 513 (1975) United States v. Guana-Sanchez
* 420 U.S. 514 (1975) Cassius v. Arizona
* 420 U.S. 515 (1975) United States v. Maine
* 420 U.S. 529 (1975) United States v. Louisiana (420 U.S. 529)
* 420 U.S. 531 (1975) United States v. Florida
* 420 U.S. 534 (1975) Estelle v. Dorrough
* 420 U.S. 546 (1975) Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad
* 420 U.S. 575 (1975) Burns v. Alcala
* 420 U.S. 592 (1975) Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.
* 420 U.S. 619 (1975) Reid v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
* 420 U.S. 636 (1975) Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld
* 420 U.S. 656 (1975) Austin v. New Hampshire
* 420 U.S. 671 (1975) United States v. Feola
* 420 U.S. 714 (1975) Oregon v. Hass
* 420 U.S. 730 (1975) Lascaris v. Shirley Lavine
* 420 U.S. 734 (1975) Cox v. Cook
* 420 U.S. 738 (1975) Schlesinger v. Councilman
* 420 U.S. 770 (1975) Iannelli v. United States
* 420 U.S. 799 (1975) Mtm, Inc. v. Baxley
* 420 U.S. 901 (1975) Virginia v. United States
* 420 U.S. 902 (1975) Gilbert v. Louisiana
* 420 U.S. 919 (1975) In re Disbarment of Tarr
* 420 U.S. 952 (1975) Hill v. United States (420 U.S. 952)
* 420 U.S. 953 (1975) Herman v. Arkansas
* 420 U.S. 1009 (1975) Orand v. United States
* 420 U.S. 1301 (1975) Patterson v. Superior Court of California In and For the County of Fresno
# United States Reports/Volume 428

* 428 U.S. 1 (1976) Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Company
* 428 U.S. 52 (1976) Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth
* 428 U.S. 106 (1976) Singleton v. Wulff
* 428 U.S. 132 (1976) Bellotti v. Baird (428 U.S. 132)
* 428 U.S. 153 (1976) Gregg v. Georgia
* 428 U.S. 242 (1976) Proffitt v. Florida
* 428 U.S. 262 (1976) Jurek v. Texas
* 428 U.S. 280 (1976) Woodson v. North Carolina
* 428 U.S. 325 (1976) Roberts v. Louisiana
* 428 U.S. 364 (1976) South Dakota v. Opperman
* 428 U.S. 397 (1976) Buffalo Forge Company v. United Steelworkers of America
* 428 U.S. 433 (1976) United States v. Janis
* 428 U.S. 465 (1976) Stone v. Powell
* 428 U.S. 543 (1976) United States v. Martinez-Fuerte
* 428 U.S. 579 (1976) Cantor v. Detroit Edison Company
* 428 U.S. 912 (1976) Alford v. Florida
* 428 U.S. 913 (1976) Colorado Springs Amusements, Ltd. v. Rizzo
* 428 U.S. 923 (1976) Alvord v. Florida