OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2010/Title IV
## TITLE IV — BUDGET PROCESS

    Subtitle A — Senate Provisions
       Part I — Budget Enforcement
          Sec. 401. Discretionary Spending Limits, Program Integrity Initiatives, and Other Adjustments.
          Sec. 402. Point of Order Against Advance Appropriations.
          Sec. 403. Emergency Legislation.
          Sec. 404. Point of Order Against Legislation Increasing Short-Term Deficit.
          Sec. 405. Point of Order Against Certain Legislation Related to Surface Transportation Funding.
       Part II — Other Provisions
          Sec. 411. Oversight of Government Performance.
          Sec. 412. Budgetary Treatment of Certain Discretionary Administrative Expenses.
          Sec. 413. Application and Effect of Changes in Allocations and Aggregates.
          Sec. 414. Adjustments to Reflect Changes in Concepts and Definitions.
          Sec. 415. Exercise of Rulemaking Powers.
    Subtitle B — House Enforcement Provisions
       Sec. 421. Adjustments for Direct Spending and Revenues.
       Sec. 422. Adjustments to Discretionary Spending Limits.
       Sec. 423. Costs of Overseas Deployments and Emergency Needs.
       Sec. 424. Point of Order Against Advance Appropriations.
       Sec. 425. Oversight of Government Performance.
       Sec. 426. Budgetary Treatment of Certain Discretionary Administrative Expenses.
       Sec. 427. Application and Effect of Changes in Allocations and Aggregates.
       Sec. 428. Adjustments to Reflect Changes in Concepts and Definitions.
       Sec. 429. Exercise of Rulemaking Powers.
# Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2010/Title IV/Subtitle A
## SUBTITLE A — SENATE PROVISIONS

    Part I — Budget Enforcement
       Sec. 401. Discretionary Spending Limits, Program Integrity Initiatives, and Other Adjustments.
       Sec. 402. Point of Order Against Advance Appropriations.
       Sec. 403. Emergency Legislation.
       Sec. 404. Point of Order Against Legislation Increasing Short-Term Deficit.
       Sec. 405. Point of Order Against Certain Legislation Related to Surface Transportation Funding.
    Part II — Other Provisions
       Sec. 411. Oversight of Government Performance.
       Sec. 412. Budgetary Treatment of Certain Discretionary Administrative Expenses.
       Sec. 413. Application and Effect of Changes in Allocations and Aggregates.
       Sec. 414. Adjustments to Reflect Changes in Concepts and Definitions.
       Sec. 415. Exercise of Rulemaking Powers.
# Dictionary of Christian Biography and Literature to the End of the Sixth Century/Alexander, St., bishop of Byzantium

​Alexander, St., bp. of Byzantium, as the city was then called (Theod. Hist. i. 19) for about 23 years, his consecration being variously dated from A.D. 313 to 317. He was already 73 years old at the time (Socr. Hist. ii. 6; Soz. Hist. iii. 3). He is highly praised by Gregory of Nazianzum (Or. 27), and by Epiphanius (adv. Haer. lxix. 10). Theodoret calls him an "apostolic" bishop (Hist. i. 3, cf. Phil. 12). In the commencement of the Arian troubles the co-operation of Alexander was specially requested by his namesake of Alexandria (Theod. i. 4); and he was present at the council of Nicaea (Soz. ii. 29). When Constantine, induced by the Eusebians (Athan. Ep. ad Serap.; Rufinus, Hist. i.), and deceived by the equivocations of Arius (Socr. i. 37), commanded that Arius should be received to communion, Alexander, though threatened by the Eusebians with deposition and banishment, persisted in his refusal to admit the archheretic to communion, and shut himself up in the church of Irene for prayer in this extremity. Alexander did not long survive Arius (Socr. ii. 6; Theod. i. 19). On his death-bed he is said to have designated Paulus as his successor, and warned his clergy against the speciousness of Macedonius.
[I.G.S.]
# Dictionary of Christian Biography and Literature to the End of the Sixth Century/Alexander, bishop of Jerusalem

​Alexander, bp. of Jerusalem, was an early friend and fellow scholar of Origen at Alexandria, where they studied together under Pantaenus and Clemens Alex. (Eus. H. E. vi. 14). He was bishop of a city in Cappadocia (ib. vi. 11); or, according to Valesius (Not. ad Euseb.) and Tillemont (Mém. eccl. iii. p. 183), of Flaviopolis in Cilicia. He became a confessor in the persecution of Severus, A.D. 204, and was thrown into prison, where he continued some years. He was still a prisoner at the commencement of Caracalla's reign, A.D. 211, when he sent a letter by the hand of Clemens to congratulate the church of Antioch on the appointment of Asclepiades as their bishop in the room of Serapion (Eus. vi. 11). The next year he was released from prison, and, in fulfilment of a vow, visited Jerusalem, where he was chosen coadjutor to the aged bp. Narcissus. This being the first occasion of the translation of a bishop, as well as of the appointment of a coadjutor bishop, and in apparent violation of the canons of the church, it was deemed essential to obtain the sanction of the whole episcopate of Palestine. A synod was summoned at Jerusalem, and the assembled bishops gave their unanimous consent to the step, A.D. 213 (Hieron. de Script. Eccl.; Vales. Not. in Euseb. vi. 11; Socr. vii. 36; Bingham, Origines, bk. ii. § 4). On the death of Narcissus, Alexander succeeded as sole bishop. His chief claim to celebrity rests on the library he formed at Jerusalem, and on the boldness with which he supported Origen against his bishop, Demetrius of Alexandria. [ Origen.] The friendship of Alexander and Origen was warm and lasting; and the latter bears testimony to the remarkable gentleness and sweetness of character manifested in all Alexander's public instructions (Orig. Homil. I. in Lib. Reg. No. 1). Alexander was again thrown into prison at Caesarea in the Decian persecution, where he died A.D. 251 (Eus. H. E. vi. 46; Hieron. Script. Eccl.). Eusebius has preserved some fragments of Alexander's letters: to the Antinoites, H. E. vi. 11, to the church of Antioch, ib.; to Origen, H. E. vi. 14, and to Demetrius, H. E. vi. 19. These have been published by Galland, Biblioth. Vet. Patrum, vol. ii. pp. 201 seq. Clemens Alex. dedicated his Canon Ecclesiasticus to him (Eus. vi. 13).
[E.V.]
# Dictionary of Christian Biography and Literature to the End of the Sixth Century/Alexander I., bishop of Rome

​Alexander I., bp. of Rome, is stated by all the authorities to have been the successor of Evaristus. Eusebius (H. E. iv. 4) makes him succeed in A.D. 109, in his Chronicle, A. D. 111 (f. 89). He assigns him in both works a reign of ten years. He has been confused with a martyr of the same name, who is mentioned in a fragment of an inscription.
[G.H.M.]
# Dictionary of Christian Biography and Literature to the End of the Sixth Century/Alogians, or Alogi

​Alogians, or Alogi (from ἀ privative and Λόγος, deniers of the Logos, or at least of the strongest witness for the Logos; not from ἄλογοι, unreasonable), a heretical sect of ​disputed existence in the latter half of 2nd cent. (c. 170). Epiphanius invented the term (Haeres. 1. I, adv. Al. c. 3), to characterize their rejection of the Divine Word preached by John (ἐπεὶ οὖν τὸν Λόγον οὐ δέχονται τὸν παρὰ Ἰωάννου κεκηρυγμένον, Ἄλογοι κληθήσονται). He traces their origin to Theodotus of Byzantium (Haer. liv. c. 1). According to his representation they denied, in ardent opposition to the Gnosticism of Cerinthus on the one hand, and to the Montanists on the other, that Jesus Christ was the eternal Logos, as taught in John i. 1‒14.; and rejected the Fourth Gospel and the Apocalypse as productions of Cerinthus. Heinichen supposes that the Alogi rejected only the Apocalypse and not the Fourth Gospel; but this is directly contradicted by Epiphanius (l. c. 3; cf. Haer. l. iv. 1). That they attributed these books to Cerinthus, the Docetist and enemy of St. John, shows their utter want of critical judgment. They tried to refute the Gospel of St. John by the Synoptic Gospels, but with very poor arguments. In opposition to the Montanists, they also denied the continuance of the spiritual gifts in the church. It is not clear from Epiphanius whether the Alogi rejected only St. John's doctrines of the Logos, or also the divinity of Christ in any form. He calls them in his violent way (l. c. 3) ἀλλότριοι παντάπασιν τοῦ κηρύγματος τῆς ἀληθείας; and says of their heresy (Haer. liv. c. 1) that it denied the Gospel of St. John and the God-Word taught therein (τὸν ἐν αὐτῷ ἐν ἀρχῆ ὄντα θεὸν λόγον). Yet he clearly distinguishes them from the Ebionites; and their opposition to Cerinthus implies that they believed in the real humanity of Christ. Dorner (Hist. of Christology, i. p. 503, German ed.) thinks it probable that they allowed no distinctions in the Godhead, and thought that the divinity of the Father dwelt in the man Jesus. But this would identify them with the Patripassians. Lardner (Works, iv. 190, viii. 627) doubts the existence of this sect, because of the absence of other data, and the tendency of Epiphanius to multiply and exaggerate heresies. But the testimony of Epiphanius is essentially sustained by Irenaeus, who mentions persons who rejected both the Gospel of St. John and the prophetic Spirit (simul et evangelium et propheticum repellunt Spiritum: adv. Haer. iii. c. ii. § 9).
Epiphanius, Haer. 50, and esp. 54; M. Merkel, Historisch-kritische Aufklärung der Streitigkeit der Aloger über die Apokalypsis (Frankf. and Leipz. 1782); F. A. Heinichen, de Alogis, Theodotianis atque Artemonitis (Leipz. 1829); Neander, Kirchengesch. i. ii. pp. 906, 1003; Dorner, op. cit. vol. ii. pp. 500‒503; Harnack, Literatur, ii. 1; Zahn, Neutest. Kanon. i. 220, ii. 967.
[P.S.]
# Dictionary of Christian Biography and Literature to the End of the Sixth Century/Ambrosius (1) of Alexandria

​Ambrosius (1) (Ἀμβρόσιος) of Alexandria, a deacon according to Jerome (de Vir. Ill. 56), the disciple and friend of Origen, died c. 250.
It is not certain whether Ambrose was a Christian by birth; but he was of a noble and wealthy family (Orig. Exhort. ad. Mart. 14 f. 49; Hieron. l.c.), and probably occupied some office under the Imperial Government (Epiph. Haer. 64, 3: cf. Orig. ib. c. 36). Endowed with an active and critical mind, he at first neglected the simple teaching of the Gospel for the more philosophic systems of heresy (Orig. in Johann. tom. v.). However, when he met Origen he recognized his true teacher, and embraced the orthodox faith (Epiph. l.c.). From that time to his death Ambrose devoted his whole energy to encouraging his great master in his labours on Holy Scripture, and used his fortune to further them (Eus. H. E. vi. 23).
Ambrose left no writings of his own except some letters, but it is evident that he exercised a powerful influence upon Origen, who called him his "taskmaster," ἐργοδιώκτης (in Johann. tom. v.), and it may have been through his zeal in "collation" (Orig. Ep. 1.) that Origen undertook his critical labours. Through mistaken devotion, Ambrose indiscreetly permitted the publication of some unrevised treatises of Origen which were intended only for his own use (Hieron. Ep. 84, 10).
[B.F.W.]
# Dictionary of Christian Biography and Literature to the End of the Sixth Century/Ambrosius (2)

​Ambrosius (2), "a chief man of Greece," and a "senator," "who became a Christian," and, according to the title of the Syriac translation, wrote the "Address to the Greeks" (Λόγος πρὸς Ἕλληνας), which is published with the works of Justin Martyr (Cureton, Spicil. Syr. pp. xi. 61). There is no other trace of this tradition, nor ground for identifying him with Ambrose of Alexandria.
[B.F.W.]
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/University of Aberdeen

From volume 1 of the work.
​Aberdeen, The University of.—The founder of this, one of the three universities established in Scotland in Catholic times, was William Elphinstone, who was Bishop of Aberdeen from 1483 to 1514. Early in his episcopate a petition had been sent to Rome in the name of King James IV, but probably framed by Elphinstone himself, representing the ignorance which prevailed in the greater part of his diocese, and in the northern districts of the kingdom generally. The Papal Bull for the erection of Aberdeen University was issued 24 February, 1491 (1495 according to our modern way of reckoning). Bishop Elphinstone had been a professor at Paris and at Orleans for nine years, and it was on the University of Paris, both as to form and organization, and also in its wide scope of general mental training, that the new establishment was modelled by its founder. In 1495 Elphinstone procured a royal charter assigning to academic purposes certain ecclesiastical revenues and conceding to the new university all the privileges enjoyed by the universities of Paris, St. Andrews, and Glasgow. Hector Boece, professor of philosophy at Paris, was appointed first principal of the university, which was established in what is now known as Old Aberdeen, near the ancient Cathedral of St. Machar. In 1593, George Keith, fifth Earl Marshal of Scotland, founded a second university (hence called Marischal College) in the new town of Aberdeen, and granted to it the buildings of the dispossessed Black (Dominican), Grey (Franciscan), and White (Carmelite) Friars as endowment. The two universities were united for a time (from 1640 until after the Restoration), and many schemes for their permanent reunion were promulgated in the 18th century; but it was not until 1859 that their fusion was finally affected, after much local opposition. New professorships and lectureships have been recently founded, and at Marischal College, now the seat of the faculties of science, law, and medicine, a scheme of building extension on a great scale is at present (1905) being carried out. The number of students is about 700, and the number of professors 24.
Rashdall, History of Universities, (1805) II, 309; Innes, Sketches of Early Scotch History (Edinburgh, 1871), 254.
D. O. Hunter-Blair.
# Dennis v. United States (384 U.S. 855)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
384 U.S. 855
Dennis v. United States (384 U.S. 855)
Argued: April 20, 1966. --- Decided: June 20, 1966
Telford Taylor, New York City, for petitioners.
Nathan Lewin, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice FORTAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Dennis v. United States (341 U.S. 494)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 (1951), was a United States Supreme Court case involving Eugene Dennis, general secretary of the Communist Party, USA and dealing with citizens' rights under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Concurring Opinions

    Frankfurter
    Jackson

## Dissenting Opinions

    Black
    Douglas
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
341 U.S. 494
Dennis v. United States
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
1. As construed and applied in this case, §§ 2(a)(1), 2(a)(3) and 3 of the Smith Act, 54 Stat. 671, making it a crime for any person knowingly or willfully to advocate the overthrow or destruction of the Government of the United States by force or violence, to organize or help to organize any group which does so, or to conspire to do so, do not violate the First Amendment or other provisions of the Bill of Rights and do not violate the First or Fifth Amendments because of indefiniteness. Pp. 495-499, 517.
2. Petitioners, leaders of the Communist Party in this country, were indicted in a federal district court under § 3 of the Smith Act for willfully and knowingly conspiring (1) to organize as the Communist Party a group of persons to teach and advocate the overthrow and destruction of the Government of the United States by force and violence, and (2) knowingly and willfully to advocate and teach the duty and necessity of overthrowing and destroying the Government of the United States by force and violence. The trial judge instructed the jury that they could not convict unless they found that petitioners intended to overthrow the Government "as speedily as circumstances would permit," but that, if they so found, then, as a matter of law, there was sufficient danger of a substantive evil that Congress has a right to prevent to justify application of the statute under the First Amendment. Petitioners were convicted, and the convictions were sustained by the Court of Appeals. This Court granted certiorari, limited to the questions: (1) Whether either § 2 or § 3 of the Smith Act, inherently or as construed and applied in the instant case, violates the First Amendment and other provisions of the Bill of Rights, and (2) whether either § 2 or § 3, inherently or as construed and applied in the instant case, violates the First and Fifth Amendments because of indefiniteness.
Held: The convictions are affirmed. Pp. 495-499, 511-512, 517.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Dennis v. United States (382 U.S. 915)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
382 U.S. 915
Dennis v. United States (382 U.S. 915)
Nathan Witt, George J. Francis and Telford Taylor, for petitioners.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Dennis v. United States (382 U.S. 915)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
382 U.S. 915
Dennis v. United States (382 U.S. 915)
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley and George B. Searls, for the United States.
Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Charles F. Brannan, John F. O'Donnell, Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., Eugene Cotton Melvin L. Wulf, Jacob Sheinkman, Joseph M. Jacobs, and John Ligtenberg, for the American Civil Liberties Union and others.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted limited to Questions 1, 2, and 3 presented by the petition, which read as follows:
'1. Whether the indictment states the offense of conspiracy to defraud the United States;
'2. Whether, in the comparative light of American Communications Ass'n v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382 [70 S.Ct. 674, 94 L.Ed. 925], and United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437 [85 S.Ct. 1707, 14 L.Ed.2d 484], Section 9(h) of the Taft-Hartley Act is constitutional;
'3. Whether the trial court erred in denying petitioners' motions for the production, to the defense or the Court, of grand jury testimony of prosecution witnesses.'

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Daphnaïda/Dedication

To the right Hono- rable and vertuous Lady Helena Marqueße of North-hampton.
Haue the rather preſumed humbly to offer vnto your Honor the dedication of this little Poëme, for that the noble and vertuous Gentlewoman of whom it is written, was by match neere alied, and in affection greatly deuoted vnto your Ladiſhip. The occaſion why I wrote the ſame, was aſ well the great good fame which I heard of her deceaſſed, as the particular good will which I beare vnto her huſband Maſter Arthure Gorges, a louer of learning and verture, whoſe houſe as your Ladiſhip by marriage hath honoured, ſo doo I finde the name of them by many notable records, to be of great antiquitie in this Realm; and ſuch as haue ever borne themſelves with honorable ​reputation to the world, and unſpotted loyaltie to their Prince and Countrey: beſides ſo linially are they deſcended from the Howards, as that the Lady Anne Howard, eldeſt daughter to Iohn Duke of Norfolke, was wife to Sir Edmund, mother to Sir Edward, and grandmother to Sir William and Sir Thomas Gorges Knights. And therefore I doo aſſure my ſelfe that no due honour done to the white Lyon, but will be moſt gratefull to your Ladiſhip, whoſe huſband and children doo ſo neerely participate with the bloud of that noble familie. So in all duetie, I recommend this Pamphlet, & the good acceptance thereof to your honorable fauour and protection. London this firſt of January, 1591.
Your Honors humbly euer.
E. Sp.
# Daphnaïda

Daphnaïda.
An Elegie vpon the death of the noble and vertuous Douglas Howard, Daughter and heire of Henry Lord Howard, Viſ- count Byndon, and wife of Ar- thure Gorges Eſquier.
Dedicated to the Right honorable the Lady Helena, Marqueſſe of Northampton.
By Ed. Sp.
At London Printed for William Ponſonby, dwelling in Paules Churchyard at the ſigne of the Biſhops head 1591.
* Dedication
* Daphnaïda
Layout 2
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Daphne, an Autumn Pastoral

DAPHNE
AN AUTUMN PASTORAL
DAPHNE
AN AUTUMN PASTORAL
BY
MARGARET SHERWOOD
BOSTON AND NEW YORK
HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN & COMPANY
MDCCCCIV
COPYRIGHT 1903 BY MARGARET SHERWOOD ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Published October, 1903
DAPHNE
AN AUTUMN PASTORAL
Chapter XVII
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1955, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 68 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Daphne

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Daphne."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Daphne", a poem by Thomas Henry Kendall
* Daphne: an Autumn Pastoral, a novel by Margaret Sherwood
* "Daphne", a poem by Jonathan Swift
* Daphne, 1891 poem by Frederick Tennyson
* Daphne, 1909 novel by Mary Augusta Ward