OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/25th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 181

Chap. CLXXXI.—An Act to establish a new judicial district in the Territory of Florida.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,New judicial district. That all the territory included within the present boundaries of the counties of Franklin, Washington, and Jackson, in the Territory of Florida shall constitute a new judicial district, to be called the Appalachicola district, the judge of which shall reside at the town of Appalachicola, or at the town of St. Joseph’s, in said district.
Judge, &c. to be appointed. Jurisdiction, powers, &c.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That a judge, marshal, and district attorney shall be appointed in said district, having the same jurisdiction, powers, duties, and liabilities, in all respects, as are now possessed by the judges of the superior courts, respectively, in the Territory of Florida, and the said marshal is hereby required to give the same bonds that other marshals are required to give under the laws of the United States and the Territory of Florida, to be approved of and recorded as now directed by law.
Time of holding courts. Process already issued.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That the said courts shall be holden at the times and places now established by law in said district, until changed by the Legislative Council of said Territory; and all process, executed by and returnable to said courts as a part of the district of West Florida, as heretofore organized, shall be as effectual in law as if the said district had not been changed; and it shall be the duty of ​the present marshal of the district of West Florida, to execute all process now in his hands, and he shall be responsible in like manner as if this act had not passed.
Salary, &c. of the judge, &c.Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That the judge, marshal, and district attorney shall have the same salaries, fees, and compensation as are allowed and paid to the other judges, marshals and district attorneys in said Territory under the laws of the United States, or the Territory of Florida, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, July 7, 1838.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/25th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 175

Chap. CLXXV.—An Act to establish a new collection district in the State of Mississippi.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Collection district to be established, &c. Vicksburg to be a port of entry. That all that part of the State of Mississippi north of the point where the range line strikes the Mississippi river, between townships thirteen and fourteen, of the Washington land district, is hereby created a collection district, to be called the Vicksburg district, whereof Vicksburg shall be the port of entry, subject to all the regulations and duties prescribed in regard to the district of Mississippi, by an act passed the thirtieth of June, eighteen hundred and thirty-four, entitled1834, ch. 135. Grand Gulf to be a port of delivery. “An act to establish a port of entry at Natchez, in Mississippi, and creating certain other ports of delivery, and for other purposes;” and that Grand Gulf shall be a port of delivery within said district of which Natchez is the port of entry.
Approved, July 7, 1838.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/25th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 178

Chap. CLXXVIII.—An Act exempting from duty the coal which may be on board of steamboats or vessels propelled by steam on their arrival at any port in the United States.
Captains of steamboats arriving in the U. S. with coal on board, may proceed with the same to foreign ports without paying duty thereon. Acts repealed.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the passage of this act, it shall be lawful for the captain or master of any steamboat or vessel propelled by steam, arriving at any port in the United States, to retain all the coal such boat or vessel may have on board at the time of her arrival, and may proceed with said coal to a foreign port, without being required to land the same in the United States, or to pay any duty thereon; and all acts inconsistent with the provisions of this act, shall be, and the same are hereby repealed.
Approved, July 7, 1838.
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 720

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted unanimously by the Security Council at its 3017th (closed) meeting, on 21 November 1991
The Security Council,
Having considered the question of the recommendation for the appointment of the Secretary-General of the United Nations,
Recommends to the General Assembly that Mr. Boutros Boutros-Ghali be appointed Secretary-General of the United Nations for a term of office from 1 January 1992 to 31 December 1996.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 727

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
8 January 1992 Adopted, as orally amended, by unanimous vote. Prepared in the course of the Council's consultations. The Security Council,
Reaffirming its resolutions 713 (1991) of 25 September 1991, 721 (1991) of 27 November 1991, and 724 (1991) of 15 December 1991,
Taking note of the further report of the Secretary-General of 5 January 1992 (S/23363 and Add.1) submitted pursuant to resolution 721 (1991),
Recalling its primary responsibility under the Charter of the United Nations for the maintenance of international peace and security,
Recalling also the provisions of Chapter VIII of the Charter of the United Nations, and noting the continuing role that the European Community will play in achieving a peaceful solution in Yugoslavia,
Deploring the tragic incident on 7 January 1992 which caused the death of five members of the European Community Monitoring Mission,
* Approves the report of the Secretary-General of 5 January 1992 (S/23363 and Add.1) and expresses its appreciation to the Secretary-General for it;
* Welcomes the signing, under the auspices of the Secretary-General's Personal Envoy, of an Implementing Accord at Sarajevo on 2 January 1992 concerning modalities for implementing the unconditional cease-fire agreed to by the parties at Geneva on 23 November 1991;
* Endorses the Secretary-General's intention as a follow-up to his Personal Envoy's latest mission to send immediately to Yugoslavia a group of up to 50 military liaison officers to promote maintenance of the cease-fire; in this connection, takes note in particular of the views expressed in paragraphs 24, 25, 28, 29 and 30 of the Secretary-General's report and the criteria reflected in paragraphs 3 and 4 of resolution 724 (1991);
* Urges all parties to honour the commitments made at Geneva and Sarajevo with a view to effecting a complete cessation of hostilities;
* Requests all the parties to take all the necessary measures to ensure the safety of the personnel sent by the United Nations and of the members of the European Community Monitoring Mission;
* Reaffirms the embargo applied in paragraph 6 of resolution 713 (1991) and in paragraph 5 of resolution 724 (1991), and decides that the embargo applies in accordance with paragraph 33 of the Secretary-General's report (S/23363);
* Encourages the Secretary-General to pursue his humanitarian efforts in Yugoslavia;
* Decides to remain actively seized of the matter until a peaceful solution is achieved.
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 732

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted unanimously by the Security Council at its 3034th meeting, on 23 January 1992 ([1])
The Security Council,
Having examined the application of the Republic of Kazakhstan for admission to the United Nations,
Recommends to the General Assembly that the Republic of Kazakhstan be admitted to membership in the United Nations.
[1] Adopted without vote.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 735

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted unanimously by the Security Council at its 3041st meeting, on 29 January 1992 ([1])
The Security Council,
Having examined the application of the Republic of Armenia for admission to the United Nations,
Recommends to the General Assembly that the Republic of Armenia be admitted to membership in the United Nations.
[1] Adopted without vote.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 736

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted unanimously by the Security Council at its 3042nd meeting, on 29 January 1992 ([1])
The Security Council,
Having examined the application of the Republic of Kyrgyzstan for admission to the United Nations,
Recommends to the General Assembly that the Republic of Kyrgyzstan be admitted to membership in the United Nations.
[1] Adopted without vote.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Nations Security Council Resolution 737

* related portals: United Nations Security Council Resolutions.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Adopted unanimously by the Security Council at its 3043rd meeting, on 29 January 1992 ([1])
The Security Council,
Having examined the application of the Republic of Uzbekistan for admission to the United Nations,
Recommends to the General Assembly that the Republic of Uzbekistan be admitted to membership in the United Nations.
[1] Adopted without vote.
This work is excerpted from an official document of the United Nations. The policy of this organisation is to keep most of its documents in the public domain in order to disseminate "as widely as possible the ideas (contained) in the United Nations Publications".
Pursuant to UN Administrative Instruction ST/AI/189/Add.9/Rev.2 available in English only, these documents are in the public domain worldwide:
* Official records (proceedings of conferences, verbatim and summary records, …)
* United Nations documents issued with a UN symbol
* Public information material designed primarily to inform the public about United Nations activities (not including public information material that is offered for sale).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT.
The Publishers would call the attention of all those who have occasion to consult the laws of the United States to the following characteristics of this edition, which justify them in unhesitatingly recommending it as worthy of the public approbation, in addition to high testimonials in the accompanying letters as to its merits.
It has the sanction of Congress, and is issued under their auspices. It is to be the edition supplied to the officers of government, and an interest in the copyright is reserved to the United States.
It will contain all the laws, and yet will be put at a less price than those editions which contain only a portion of those laws. The purchaser will be sure that he can find every law which he may have occasion to refer to.
It is enriched with copious notes of the decisions of the courts of the United States on the several statutes, and with references to other statutes.
It will be the only edition in which the laws are chaptered as is directed by the joint resolution of Congress of March 3, 1845, except the session acts, which are too expensive to be within the reach of but very few persons.
It can be relied upon for accuracy. It is printed with great care, from authorized editions of the laws, and then is subjected to a careful revision by the records at the seat of government. The value given to it, by so great care to secure its entire authenticity, will be at once perceived by all professional persons. The Publishers would refer those whose pursuits have not given them occasion to appreciate the importance of the entire accuracy of the text, to the letters of the Hon. Rufus Choate, and of the Hon. Robert C. Winthrop, which are printed herewith.
The superiority of the paper on which it is printed, and of its typographical execution, over all other editions, will be seen and appreciated at once by every one.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/Front pages

BY AUTHORITY OF CONGRESS.
THE
Public Statutes at Large
OF THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
FROM THE
ORGANIZATION OF THE GOVERNMENT IN 1789, TO MARCH 3, 1845.
ARRANGED IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER.
WITH
REFERENCES TO THE MATTER OF EACH ACT AND TO THE SUBSEQUENT ACTS ON THE SAME SUBJECT,
AND
COPIOUS NOTES OF THE DECISIONS
OF THE
Courts of the United States
CONSTRUING THOSE ACTS, AND UPON THE SUBJECTS OF THE LAWS.
WITH AN
INDEX TO THE CONTENTS OF EACH VOLUME,
AND A
FULL GENERAL INDEX TO THE WHOLE WORK, IN THE CONCLUDING VOLUME.
TOGETHER WITH
The Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution of the United States;
AND ALSO,
TABLES, IN THE LAST VOLUME, CONTAINING LISTS OF THE ACTS RELATING TO THE JUDICIARY, IMPOSTS AND TONNAGE, THE PUBLIC LANDS, ETC.
EDITED BY
RICHARD PETERS, ESQ., COUNSELLOR AT LAW.
The rights and interest of the United States in the stereotype plates from which this work is printed, are hereby recognised, acknowledged, and declared by the publishers, according to the provisions of the joint resolution of Congress, passed March 3, 1845.
VOL. I.
BOSTON: CHARLES C. LITTLE AND JAMES BROWN. 1845.
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1845, by Charles C. Little & James Brown, in the Clerk’s Office of the District Court of the District of Massachusetts.
* PHILADELPHIA:
* STEREOTYPED BY L. JOHNSON & CO.
* CAMBRIDGE:
* METCALF AND COMPANY,
* PRINTERS TO THE UNIVERSITY.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/Lists and Tables

TABLES,
SHOWING THE
COMPARATIVE CHAPTERING
IN VARIOUS EDITIONS OF
The Laws of the United States
AND EXHIBITING
LISTS OF THE ACTS OF CONGRESS, FROM 1789 TO 1845 INCLUSIVE,
RELATING TO THE
JUDICIARY, IMPORTS AND TONNAGE,
PUBLIC LANDS
AND
POST-OFFICE.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/Front Matter

Front Matter
| i | Front pages |
| iii | To the Honorable Joseph Story |
| v | Advertisement |
| vi | Letters Addressed to the Publishers |
| ix | Preface |
| xi | Extracts from Letters Addressed to the Editor |
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/5th Congress/3rd Session/Resolution 1

A subscription to Folwell’s edition of the Journals of Congress authorized.Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of the Senate, and the Clerk of the House of Representatives be authorized and directed to subscribe, on such terms as they may deem eligible, for the use of the Senate and House of Representatives, for four hundred copies of the Journals of Congress, which are proposed to be published by Richard Folwell; and such number of copies of deficient volumes of the sets now in print, as may be necessary to complete the same.
Approved, March 2, 1799.
# Vannevar Bush to Franklin D. Roosevelt (October 13, 1941)

* related portals: World War II.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
COPY
FROM THE OFFICE OF
V. BUSH
October 13, 1941.
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT:
Unless you instruct otherwise, I will change the code word in the letter from Maudson to Mayson. On Firday I will seal it, and deliver it to Hovde, with explicit instructions. He will leave by plane Monday or very soon thereafter.
I suggest the change because I fear that the word Maud may convey too much. Someone may know on what the Maud Committee is working.
V.B.
V. Bush
O.K.
F.D.R.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Vannevar v. Bryant

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
88 U.S. 41
Vannevar v. Bryant
ERROR to the Superior Court of Massachusetts; the case being thus:
An act of Congress of March 2d, 1867, 'to amend' a prior act 'for the removal of causes in certain cases from State courts' (the act quoted supra, pp. 36, 37), enacts as follows:
'Where a suit is pending in any State court in which there is a controversy between a citizen of the State in which the suit is brought and a citizen of another State . . . such citizen of another State, whether he be plaintiff or defendant, if he will file an affidavit, &c., . . . may at any time before the final hearing or trial of the suit, file a petition for the removal of the suit into the next Circuit Court of the United States, to be held in the district where the suit is pending, &c., . . . and it shall, thereupon, be the duty of the State court . . . to proceed no further in the suit. And copies, &c., being entered in such court of the United States, the suit shall there proceed in the same manner as if it had been brought there by original process,' &c.
This statute being in force, Bryant sued Vannevar, and seven other persons, owners of the steamboat Eastern Queen, in the Superior Court of Massachusetts, to recover damages for an unlawful assault upon him by their servants and agents while he was a passenger on their boat from Boston to Gardiner. The plaintiff and four of the defendants were citizens of Massachusetts, but three of the defendants were citizens of Maine, and one of Missouri. The defence was joint. A trial was had by a jury, which resulted in a verdict of $8000 against all the defendants. Thereupon all the defendants joined in a motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial because the damages were excessive. Pending this motion and before judgment upon the verdict, the three defendants who were citizens of Maine presented their petition for the removal of the suit to the Circuit Court of the United States, and accompanied it with the necessary affidavits and bond, under the above act of March 2d, 1867. The court refused to allow the transfer, and this refusal was now assigned for error.
Mr. R. M. Morse, Jr., for the plaintiff in error; Mr. C. R. Train, contra.
The CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Vannevar v. Bryant/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
88 U.S. 41
Vannevar v. Bryant
In the case of the Sewing Machine Companies, it was held that an action upon a contract by a plaintiff, who was a citizen of the State in which the suit was brought, against two defendants, who were citizens of other States, and a third who was a citizen of the same State as the plaintiff, was not removable to the Circuit Court under this act upon the petition of the two non-resident defendants. Without considering the question whether, in an action of tort by a resident plaintiff, a non-resident defendant can, at a proper stage of the proceedings and upon proper showing, remove the cause as against himself, to the Circuit Court, under the act of 27th July, 1866, we are clearly of the opinion that this case comes within the principle settled in that of the Sewing Machine Companies. The petition was filed under the act of 1867, for a removal of the suit, and not, under the act of 1866, for its removal as against the non-resident defendants.
The transfer was also properly refused for another reason. The act authorizes the petition for removal to be filed 'at any time before the final hearing or trial of the suit.' The hearing or trial, here referred to, is the examination of the facts in issue. Hearing applies to suits in chancery and trial to actions at law. In Insurance Company v. Dunn, it was held, that after a motion for a new trial had been granted, a removal might be had. But after one trial the right to a second must be perfected before a demand for the transfer can properly be made. Every trial of a cause is final until, in some form, it has been vacated. Causes cannot be removed to the Circuit Court for a review of the action of the State court, but only for trial. The Circuit Court cannot, after one trial in a State court, determine whether there shall be another. That is for the State court. To authorize the removal, the action must, at the time of the application, be actually pending for trial. Such was not the case here.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

## Notes

* ↑ 18 Wallace, 553.
* ↑ 14 Stat. at Large, 306. See the act, supra, p. 36.-REF.
* ↑ 19 Wallace, 214.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse