OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Missouri v. Illinois (200 U.S. 496)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
200 U.S. 496
Missouri v. Illinois
Argued: January 2, 3, 4, 1906. --- Decided: February 19, 1906
Messrs. Sam B. Jeffries, Charles W. Bates, Herbert S. Hadley, N. T. Gentry, and W. F. Woerner for complainant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 497-510 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. H. J. Hamlin and W. H. Stead for the state of Illinois.
Messrs. James Todd and John G. Drennan for sanitary district of Chicago.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 510-517 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri v. Iowa

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Missouri v. Iowa."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Missouri v. Iowa (48 U.S. 660)
* Missouri v. Iowa (160 U.S. 688)
* Missouri v. Iowa (51 U.S. 1)
# Missouri v. Illinois (202 U.S. 598)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
202 U.S. 598
Missouri v. Illinois
Argued: May 14, 1906. --- Decided: May 28, 1906
Mr. Erasmus C. Lindley for the sanitary district of Chicago.
Messrs. Herbert S. Hadley, Charles W. Bates, and Sam B. Jeffries for Missouri.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Missouri v. Iowa (51 U.S. 1)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
51 U.S. 1
Missouri v. Iowa

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Monks v. New Jersey

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Marshall
United States Supreme Court
398 U.S. 71
Monks v. New Jersey
Argued: Feb. 26, 1970. --- Decided: May 25, 1970
Anthony G. Amsterdam, Stanford, Cal., for petitioner.
Archibald Kreiger, Paterson, N.J., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Monks v. New Jersey/Dissent Marshall

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Marshall
United States Supreme Court
398 U.S. 71
Monks v. New Jersey
Argued: Feb. 26, 1970. --- Decided: May 25, 1970
Mr. Justice MARSHALL, with whom Mr. Justice DOUGLAS joins, dissenting.
Petitioner, a 15-year-old boy, was arrested at 1 o'clock in the morning of February 16, 1957, removed to the police station, and questioned by detectives for several hours about two purse-snatching incidents. He was then held in confinement in the Children's Shelter for 10 days during which time he was questioned at least three times by two detectives in the presence of a juvenile probation officer. Further questioning began on other crimes including two murders in the same area as the purse snatchings.
During the entire 10-day period this 15-year-old boy was without advice of his parents, lawyer, or friends. Indeed, his mother first learned he was in custody after he confessed to the two murders. During the entire 10-day period petitioner was never told he had a right to remain silent, or to refuse to answer the questions by the two detectives.
The end came on February 26, 1957. Petitioner arose at 7 o'clock in the morning, questioning began at 10 o'clock and continued off and on for 15 hours before the confession was typed. During this period he was moved from the Children's Shelter to the courthouse, the grand jury room, and an adjacent room. He was given several lie-detector tests and confronted with alleged witnesses. He had no sleep. He was given sandwiches for his lunch and dinner.
Certainly, such treatment so clearly violates the holdings of Haley v Ohio, 332 U.S. 596, 68 S.Ct. 302, 92 L.Ed. 224 (1948); Culombe v. Connecticut, 367 U.S. 568, 81 S.Ct. 1860, 6 L.Ed.2d 1037 (1961); Haynes v. Washington, 373 U.S. 503, 83 S.Ct. 1336, 10 L.Ed.2d 513 (1963); and Greenwald v. Wisconsin, 390 U.S. 519, 88 S.Ct. 1152, 20 L.Ed.2d 77 (1968), as to require a reversal in this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Monks v. New Jersey/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Marshall
United States Supreme Court
398 U.S. 71
Monks v. New Jersey
Argued: Feb. 26, 1970. --- Decided: May 25, 1970
Having scrutinized the record and considered the briefs and oral arguments submitted on both sides, we are satisfied that petitioner's claim of coercion respecting his confession, given by him over 12 years ago upon his apprehension as an alleged juvenile delinquent, does not merit the plenary review that we thought it might deserve at the time petitioner's pro se petition for certiorari was granted. 395 U.S. 903, 89 S.Ct. 1754, 23 L.Ed.2d 216. The other claims tendered in such petition fare no better.
The further claim advanced by petitioner's appointed counsel in this Court respecting the alleged unconstitutional application of N.J.Stat.Ann. § 2A:4-37(b) has been raised for the first time upon this writ and the state courts have had no opportunity to pass upon it.
Accordingly we conclude that the writ of certiorari should be dismissed as improvidently granted, without prejudice to any further appropriate proceedings below.
Writ dismissed.
Mr. Justice MARSHALL, with whom Mr. Justice DOUGLAS joins, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Monna Innominata

This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
    I wish I could remember that first day,
    First hour, first moment of your meeting me,
    If bright or dim the season, it might be
    Summer or Winter for aught I can say;
    So unrecorded did it slip away,
    So blind was I to see and to foresee,
    So dull to mark the budding of my tree
    That would not blossom for many a May.
    If only I could recollect it, such
    A day of days! I let it come and go
    As traceless as a thaw of bygone snow;
    It seemed to mean so little, meant so much;
    If only now I could recall that touch,
    First touch of hand in hand – Did one but know!
# Monica

“Pardon give to Monica…”
* Shorter, Dora Sigerson (1893), "Monica" in Verses
* Shorter, Dora Sigerson (1907), "Monica" in The Collected Poems of Dora Sigerson Shorter
# Monitor Patriot Company v. Roy/Dissent Black

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Black
United States Supreme Court
401 U.S. 265
Monitor Patriot Company v. Roy
Argued: Dec. 17, 1970. --- Decided: Feb 24, 1971
Separate opinion of Mr. Justice BLACK, with whom Mr. Justice DOUGLAS joins.
I concur in the judgments of the Court in this case and in No. 109 and No. 118, for the reasons set out in my concurring opinion in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 293, 84 S.Ct. 710, 733, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964), in my concurring and dissenting opinion in Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130, 170, 87 S.Ct. 1975, 1999, 18 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1967), and in Mr. Justice Douglas' concurring opinion in Garrison v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 80, 85 S.Ct. 209, 218-219, 13 L.Ed.2d 125 (1964). However, I dissent from those portions of the opinions in this case and No. 118 which would permit these libel cases to be tried again under a different set of jury instructions. As I have stated before, '(I)t is time for this Court to abandon New York Times Co. v. Sullivan and adopt the rule to the effect that the First Amendment was intended to leave the press free from the harassment of libel judgments.' Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, supra, 388 U.S. at 172, 87 S.Ct. at 2000. (separate opinion of Black, J.).

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Monna Lisa

She gave me all that woman can, Nor her soul's nunnery forego, A confidence that man to man Without remorse can never show.
Rare art, that can sense refine Till not a pulse rebellious stirs, And, since she never can be mine, Makes it seem sweeter to be hers!
# Modern English Biography

This work was published in three volumes from 1892 to 1901. There are also three supplements, the last of which was published in 1921. These are in the public domain in the United States.
* Volume 1 (A - H) (1892) (external scan)
* Volume 2 (I - Q) (1897) (transcription project)
* Volume 3 (R - Z) (1901) (external scan)
* Volume 4 (1908 supplement, A - C) (external scan)
* Volume 5 (1912 supplement, D - K) (external scan)
* Volume 6 (1921 supplement, L - Z) (external scans (multiple parts): 1, 2)
# Modern English Biography/Volume 6 (1921 supplement)

UDNY, GEORGE (2 son of Robert George Udny, member of council of governor-general of India 1801–7, died 24 Oct. 1830 aged 69). b. 1803; educ. Haileybury coll. 1818–20; writer Bengal civil service 30 April 1819; acting magistrate of Jessore 1823; acting import warehouse keeper 1826–7; went home 1827; returned to India 2 Oct. 1830; sec. and treasurer of Bank of Bengal 17 Sept. 1833 to 1840; on furlough 1840–3; sub-treasurer general treasury Bengal 1843, retired on annuity fund 1851; barrister L.I. 6 June 1855; author of A word on "the currency" 1845, A word on law in general, and on the law of England, and the study of it in particular 1855, Executory interests of the law of England 1857, Harmony of laws; or, examination of the principles of the laws of civilized nations 1858. d. 142 Adelaide road, Hampstead, 7 April 1879. The records of the honourable society of Lincoln's Inn, 1896, ii 257.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Modern English Prose

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Modern English Prose."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Modern English Prose (Boas)
* Littell's Living Age/Volume 128/Issue 1658/Modern English Prose
# Modern English Biography/Volume 5 (1912 supplement)

GOOLD, FREDERICK FALKENER (2 son of Thomas Goold, a master in court of chancery Ireland, d. 16 July 1846). b. May 1808; educ. Trin. coll. Dublin, B.A. 1831, M.A. 1853; R. of Raymochy, Donegal 1852-68; archdeacon of Raphoe 13 Dec. 1852 to death, installed 6 May 1853. d. Bath 27 Jan. 1877. Cotton's Fasti ecclesiae Hibernicae, Supplement 1878 p. 111.
DISNEY, BRABAZON WILLIAM. b. 1797 ; scholar Trin. coll Dublin 1817, B.A. 1821, M.A. and B.D. 1842 ; R. of Stackallan near Navan co. Meath to Dec. 1851 ; archdeacon of Raphoe 25 Aug. 1835 to Sept. 1845 ; dean of Emly 20 Sept. 1845 to Dec. 1851 and of Armagh and Clogher 23 Dec. 1851 to death, instituted and installed 2 Jan. 1852 ; author of Sermons practical and occasional 1847. d. Summerland, Monkstown near Cork 20 Dec. 1874. Cotton's Fasti ecclesiae Hibernicae supplement 1878 p. 87 ; Times 28 Dec. 1874 p. 1.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Modern English Prose (Boas)

A collection of excerpts and essays by other authors

## History and Biography

* The Gentle Shakespeare
* The Sack of Rome
* Napoleon
* The Duke of Wellington
* Gladstone
* The Storm
* The Lusitania
* Lenin
* War Guilt
* Lord Oxford and Asquith
* The Patriotism of Britain
# Moses v. Wooster

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
115 U.S. 285
Moses v. Wooster
Argued: November 2, 1885. ---
The suit below was in equity and brought by George H. Wooster, the appellee, against Solomon Moses, Gotcho Blum, and Solomon Weil, partners under the name of Moses, Blum & Weil, for an infringement of letters patent. A final decree for an injunction and damages was rendered against the defendants, May 23, 1883. From this decree all the defendants appealed, and the appeal was docketed here October 12, 1883. Blum died January 2, 1884. On the eleventh of April, 1885, Wooster appeared in this court and suggested his death; whereupon the usual order under rule 15, § 1, was entered, that unless his representatives should become parties within the first 10 days of this term, the appeal would be dismissed. Proof of the due publication of a copy of this order has been made, but the representatives of the deceased appellant have not appeared. The surviving appellants now move that the action abate as to the decedent, but that it proceed at their suit as survivors.
W. F. Mattingly, for appellants.
J. E. Hyndon Hyde, for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 285-287 intentionally omitted]
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mosher v. City of Phoenix

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
287 U.S. 29
Mosher v. City of Phoenix
Argued: Oct. 17, 1932. --- Decided: Nov 7, 1932
Mr. John W. Ray, of Phoenix, Ariz., for petitioner.
Mr. Sidman I. Barber, of Boise, Idaho, for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mosher v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
127 U.S. 390
Mosher v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Railway Company
[Statement of Case from pages 390-393 intentionally omitted]
Clinton Rowell, for plaintiff in error.
John F. Dillon and Winslow S. Pierce, Jr., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice GRAY, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mosheuvel v. District of Columbia

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
191 U.S. 247
Mosheuvel v. District of Columbia
Argued: October 20, 1902. --- Decided: by Divided Court November 3, 1902
Messrs. Charles Cowles Tucker and Henry E. Davis for plaintiffs in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 248-250 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Andrew B. Duvall and Edward H. Thomas for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Moses v. Washington/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 428
Moses v. Washington
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mr. Verdant Green Married and Done for

Part III of The Adventures of Mr. Verdant Green. Arguably a cult college classic; not the least of it's charms being the excellent illustrations by the author—a contributor to Punch (magazine), among others, and highly regarded as an illustrator by such contemporaries as George Cruikshank.
Layout 4
MR. VERDANT GREEN
MARRIED AND DONE FOR:
BEING
THE THIRD AND CONCLUDING PART
OF THE
ADVENTURES OF Mr. VERDANT GEEEN,
An Oxford Graduate
BY CUTHBERT BEDE, B.A.
LONDON:
JAMES BLACKWOOD, PATERNOSTER ROW.
1857.
CONTENTS OF PART III.
CHAPTER I.
CHAPTER II.
CHAPTER III.
CHAPTER IV.
CHAPTER V.
CHAPTER VI.
CHAPTER VII.
CHAPTER VIII.
CHAPTER IX.
CHAPTER X.
CHAPTER XI.
CHAPTER XII.
CHAPTER THE LAST.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mr. Tesla on Thermo Electricity

In a letter to the editor of the Buffalo Enquirer, Mr. Nikola Tesla replies as follows in regard to an inquiry on the subject of the future of electricity: "The transmission of power has interested me not only as a technical problem, but far more in its bearing upon the welfare of mankind. In this sense I have expressed myself in a lecture, delivered some time ago. "Since electrical transmission of energy is a process much more economical than any other we know of, it necessarily must play an important part in the future, no matter how the primary energy is derived from the sun. Of all the ways the utilization of a waterfall seems to be the simplest and least wasteful. Even if we could, by combining carbon in a battery, convert the work of the chemical combination into electrical energy with very high economy, such mode of obtaining power would, in my opinion, be no more than a mere makeshift, bound to be replaced sooner or later by a more perfect method, which implies no consumption of any material whatever."
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Muses no more but mazes

A poem existing in four known manuscripts, attributed to Essex. The poem is an attack on Sir Walter Raleigh, who is satirised as a crow, parrot, cuckoo and ass. The poem appears to refer to some literary device ("conceit") in which Raleigh has put Essex in the shade in the eyes of the queen. May theorises that it was written in response to Raleigh's flattery of the queen in his 1590 dedicatory poem attached to The Faery Queen, and possibly to Raleigh's involvement in court intrigue against Essex's marriage in the same year.
Notes
Muses no more, but mazes be your names When discord’s sound shall mar your concord sweet Unkindly now your careful fancy frames, When fortune treads your favours under feet; But foul befall that cursed cuckoo’s throat That so hath crossed sweet Philomela’s note.
And all unhappy hatched was that bird, That parrot-like can never cease to prate; But most untimely spoken was that word, That brought the world in such a woeful state That love and liking quite are overthrown And in their place are grief and sorrows grown.
Is this the honour of a haughty thought, For honour’s hate to have all spite at love? Hath wretched skill this reason taught, In this conceit such discontent to move, That beauty is so of herself bereft, That no good hope of aught good hap is left?
Oh let no phoenix look upon a crow, Nor dainty hills bow down to dirty dales; Let never heaven an hellish humour know, Nor firm affect give ear to foolish tales; For this in fine will fall to be the troth, That filthy water makes unwholesome broth.
Woe to the world, the sun is in a cloud, And darksome mists do overrun the day; In high conceit, is not content allowed; Favour must die and fancies wear away. O heavens, what hell! The bands of love are broken, Nor must a thought of such a thing be spoken.
Mars must become a coward of his mind, Whiles Vulcan stands to prate of Venus’ toys. Beauty must seem to go against her kind, In crossing nature in her sweetest joys; But oh, no more, it is too much to think, So pure a mouth should puddle-water drink.
But since the world is at this woeful pass, Let love’s submission honour’s wrath appease. Let not a horse be mated with an ass, Nor hateful tongue an happy heart disease; So shall the world commend a sweet conceit, And humble faith on heavenly favour wait.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Music (Owen)

This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
I have been urged by earnest violins And drunk their mellow sorrows to the slake Of all my sorrows and my thirsting sins. My heart has beaten for a brave drum's sake. Huge chords have wrought me mighty: I have hurled Thuds of gods' thunder. And with old winds pondered Over the curse of this chaotic world,- With low lost winds that maundered as they wandered.
I have been gay with trivial fifes that laugh; And songs more sweet than possible things are sweet; And gongs, and oboes. Yet I guessed not half Life's symphony till I had made hearts beat, And touched Love's body into trembling cries, And blown my love's lips into laughs and sighs.
# Music I Heard

Music I heard with you was more than music, And bread I broke with you was more than bread. Now that I am without you, all is desolate, All that was once so beautiful is dead.
  Your hands once touched this table and this silver,
And I have seen your fingers hold this glass.
These things do not remember you, beloved:
And yet your touch upon them will not pass.
  For it was in my heart you moved among them,
And blessed them with your hands and with your eyes.
And in my heart they will remember always:
They knew you once, O beautiful and wise!
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1973, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 50 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Music (Coates)

"The might of music, and its mystic fire"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1898), "Music" in Poems.
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "Music" in Poems I.

## Notes

Sometime between the 1898 and 1916 versions, the word "thrill" in the third line was replaced with "infuse".
# Music (Emerson)

Let me go where'er I will
* "The Poet" in The Riverside song book, 1893.
* "Music" in Poems (Household Edition), 1904.