OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Executive Order 9952

more info.
See the Notes section for a list of Executive Orders affected by or related to the issuance of this Executive Order.
Signed by President Harry S. Truman Thursday, April 22, 1948
Federal Register page & date: 13 FR 2214, Saturday, April 24, 1948
By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Civil Service Act (22 Stat. 403) and by section 1753 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:
* All existing reemployment rights to positions in the Federal service acquired under authority of Executive Order No. 8973 of December 12, 1941, Executive Order No. 9067 of February 20, 1942, or Directive No. X as amended by Directive No. XVI of the War Manpower Commission (7 F.R. 7298, 11050), or under regulations of the Civil Service Commission issued pursuant thereto, shall expire at the end of the six months' period following the date of this order unless application for reemployment under such rights shall have been made before the end of such six months' period.
* This order shall not affect reemployment rights heretofore or hereafter acquired under Executive Order No. 9711 of April 11, 1946, No. 9721 of May 10, 1946, No. 9862 of May 31, 1947, or No. 9932 of February 27, 1948.
* The Civil Service Commission is authorized to prescribe such rules and regulations and to establish such procedures as may be necessary for the administration of this order.

## Notes

Shortcut: WS:USEO

### Amended by

* Executive Order 9994, September 1, 1948

### See Related

* Executive Order 8973, December 12, 1941;
* Executive Order 9067, February 20, 1942;
* Executive Order 9711, April 11, 1946;
* Executive Order 9721, May 10, 1946;
* Executive Order 9862, May 31, 1947;
* Executive Order 9932, February 27, 1948
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 9955

more info.
See the Notes section for a list of Executive Orders affected by or related to the issuance of this Executive Order.
Signed by President Harry S. Truman Thursday, May 6, 1948
Federal Register page & date: 13 FR 2442, Friday, May 7, 1948
By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 210(b) of the Public Health Service Act (58 Stat. 687) as amended by Public Law 425, 80th Congress, approved February 28, 1948, it is hereby ordered as follows:
    Commissioned officers of the Regular Corps of the Public Health Service in the nurse, dietitian, and therapist categories shall be permanently promoted to the full and senior grades only if vacancies exist in such grades, and commissioned officers of the Regular Corps of the Public Health Service in the pharmacist and sanitarian categories shall be permanently promoted to the senior grade only if vacancies exist in such grade.

## Notes

Shortcut: WS:USEO

### Revoked by

* Executive Order 9993, August 31, 1948
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 9951

more info.
See the Notes section for a list of Executive Orders affected by or related to the issuance of this Executive Order.
Signed by President Harry S. Truman Wednesday, April 21, 1948
Federal Register page & date: 13 FR 2191, Friday, April 23, 1948
Whereas such land is no longer needed by the United States for military purposes, and it is deemed advisable and in the public interest that it be restored to the use of the Territory of Hawaii:
       Beginning at the west corner of this parcel of land and on the south side of Prison Road, the coordinates of said point of beginning referred to Government Survey triangulation station ‘‘Kawa’’ being 163.20 feet south and 305.44 feet west, as shown on Government Survey Registered Map 2669, and running by azimuths measured clockwise from true south:
* 241° 53' 55.00 feet along the south side of Prison Road;
* 331° 53' 98.57 feet along Kuwili Park and Playground (Executive Order No. 422 of July 23, 1930);
* 50° 33' 56.65 feet along Grant 8564 to Oahu Railway and Land Company;
* 152° 10' 109.70 feet along L. C. Award 81 F.L. to Kahawaiolaa to the pint of beginning.
       The area of this parcel is 5,755 square feet, more or less.

## Notes

Shortcut: WS:USEO

### See Related

* None Available
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Echo

ECHO.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/From House to Home

FROM HOUSE TO HOME.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Goblin Market

GOBLIN MARKET.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Fata Morgana

FATA MORGANA.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Christian and Jew

CHRISTIAN AND JEW.
A DIALOGUE.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Cousin Kate

COUSIN KATE.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Dead Before Death

DEAD BEFORE DEATH.
SONNET.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Bitter for Sweet

BITTER FOR SWEET.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Dream Land

DREAM LAND
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/In the Round Tower at Jhansi, June 8, 1857

IN THE ROUND TOWER AT JHANSI,
June 8, 1857
# Gehazi

Whence comest thou, Gehazi,  So reverend to behold, In scarlet and in ermines  And chain of England's gold? 'From following after Naaman  To tell him all is well, Whereby my zeal hath made me  A judge in Israel.'
Well done, well done, Gehazi!  Stretch forth thy ready hand. Thou barely 'scaped from judgment,  Take oath to judge the land Unswayed by gift of money  Or privy bribe, more base, Of knowledge which is profit  In any market-place.
Search out and probe, Gehazi,  As thou of all canst try, The truthful, well-weighed answer  That tells the blacker lie— The loud, uneasy virtue,  The anger feigned at will, To overbear a witness  And make the Court keep still.
Take order now, Gehazi,  That no man talk aside In secret with his judges  The while his case is tried Lest he should show them—reason  To keep a matter hid, And subtly lead the questions  Away from that he did.
Thou mirror of uprightness,  What ails thee at thy vows? What means the risen whiteness  Of the skin between thy brows? The boils that shine and burrow,  The sores that slough and bleed— The leprosy of Naaman  On thee and all thy seed?  Stand up, stand up, Gehazi,  Draw close thy robe and go,  Gehazi, Judge in Israel,  A leper white as snow!
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1936, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 87 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gelbard v. United States/Concurrence White

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Douglas White
* Dissenting Opinion Rehnquist
[p69] MR. JUSTICE WHITE, concurring.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1826 (a) a witness who refuses to testify "without just cause" may be held in contempt of court. Here, grand jury witnesses are involved, and the just cause claimed to excuse them is that the testimony demanded involves the disclosures and use of communications [p70] allegedly intercepted in violation of the controlling federal statute and hence inadmissible under 18 U.S.C. § 2515.
The United States asserts that § 2515 affords no excuse to grand jury witnesses under any circumstances. Reliance is placed on § 2518 (10)(a) and the legislative history of the statute. I agree with the Court, however, that at least where the United States has intercepted communications without a warrant in circumstances where court approval was required, it is appropriate in constructing and applying 28 U.S.C. § 1826 not to require the grand jury witness to answer and hence further the plain policy of the wiretap statute. This unquestionably works a change in the law with respect to the rights of grand jury witnesses, but it is a change rooted in a complex statute, the meaning of which is not immediately obvious as the opinions filed today so tellingly demonstrate.
Where the Government produces a court order for the interception, however, and the witness nevertheless demands a full-blown suppression hearing to determine the legality of the order, there may be room for striking a different accommodation between the due functioning of the grand jury system and the federal wiretap statute. Suppression hearings in these circumstances would result in protracted interruption of grand jury proceedings. At the same time, prosecutors and other officers who have been granted and relied on a court order for the interception would be subject to no liability under the statute, whether the order is valid or not; and, in any event, the deterrent value of excluding the evidence will be marginal at best. It is well, therefore, that the Court has left this issue open for consideration by the District Court on remand. See ante, at 61 n. 22.
[p71] Of course, where the Government officially denies the fact of electronic surveillance of the witness, the matter is at an end and the witness must answer.
# Gelbard v. United States
## Concurring Opinions

    Douglas
    White

## Dissenting Opinion

    Rehnquist
Supreme Court of the United States
408 U.S. 41
Gelbard et al. v. United States
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
No. 71-110. Argued: March 27, 1972 --- Decided: June 26, 1972
Where a grand jury witness is adjudicated in civil contempt under 28 U.S.C. § 1826 (a) for refusing "without just cause shown to comply with an order of the court to testify," the witness may invoke as a defense 18 U.S.C. § 2515, which directs that "[w]henever any wire or oral communication has been intercepted, no part of the contents of such communication and no evidence derived therefrom may be received in evidence in any... proceeding in or before any... grand jury...," since a showing that the interrogation would be based upon the illegal interception of the witness' communications would constitute the "just cause" that precludes a finding of contempt. Pp. 46-61.
No. 71-110, 443 F. 2d 837, reversed and remanded;
No. 71-263, 450 F. 2d 199 and 450 F. 2d 231, affirmed.
BRENNAN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which DOUGLAS, STEWART, WHITE, and MARSHALL, JJ., joined. DOUGLAS, J., post, p. 62, and WHITE, J., post, p. 69, filed concurring opinions. REHNQUIST, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which BURGER, C. J., and BLACKMUN and POWELL, JJ., joined, post, p. 71.
Michael E. Tigar argued the cause for petitioners in No. 71-110. With him on the brief was Burton Marks. Mr. Marks filed a brief for petitioner Gelbard in No. 71-110.
Deputy Solicitor General Friedman argued the cause for the United States in both cases. On the brief in No. 71-110 were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Petersen, Allan A. Tuttle, and Beatrice Rosenberg. On the brief in No. 71-263 were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Mardian, Mr. Tuttle, and Robert L. Keuch.
Jack J. Levine argued the cause pro hac vice for respondent Egan in No. 71-263. With him on the brief was Charles R. Nesson. Bernard L. Segal filed a brief for respondent Walsh in No. 71-263.
Melvin L. Wulf, Sanford Jay Rosen, Thomas Harvey, and Laurence R. Sperber filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union as amicus curiae urging reversal in No. 71-110 and affirmance in No. 71-263. Frank G. Carrington, Jr., and Alan S. Ganz filed a brief for Americans for Effective Law Enforcement, Inc., as amicus curiae urging reversal in No. 71-263.

## Notes

* ↑ Together with No. 71-263, United States v. Egan et al. on certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
# Gegiow v. Uhl

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
239 U.S. 3
Gegiow v. Uhl
Argued: October 13 and 14, 1915. --- Decided: October 25, 1915
Messrs. Max J. Kohler, Morris Jablow, Ralph Barnett, and Abram I. Elkus for petitioners.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 4-5 intentionally omitted]
Solicitor General Davis and Assistant Attorney General Wallace for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 6-8 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Guide through Carlsbad and its environs/The Natural Sprudel-Salt and "Quellsalz"

IV.—THE NATURAL SPRUDEL-SALT AND “QUELLSALZ”.
This natural salt contains in 100 parts—sulphate of soda, 37.69; chloride of sodium, 0.39; carbonate of soda, 5.99; traces of sulphate of potash, and 55.52 parts of water. It is principally used to in​crease the purgative action of the mineral waters, for which from one to two drachms of it should be added to the first tumbler; it may also be used independently, or after having taken the waters at Carlsbad in the dose of from one to four drachms daily, dissolved in hot water, and mixed with from two to four tumblersful of soda, selters, or imported Carlsbad water. The price (at Carlsbad) of one pound of the salt is 3 florins (6 Mark = 6 shillings).
# Guide through Carlsbad and its environs/The Tepid and Cold Mineral Springs

III—THE TEPID AND COLD MINERAL SPRINGS.
1. The Sprudelsäuerling is close to the Sprudel, and has a temperature varying from 19° R. (75° F.) to 24° R. (86° F.); it contains 16 grs, solid constituents in 1 lb. of the water; the constituents are the same as are contained in the warm springs, and vary only with regard to their quantities, i. e., sulphate of soda, 6.62 grains; carbonate of soda, 3.70; muriate of soda, 2.89; carbonate of lime, 1.17; sulphate of potash, 0.66; carbonate of magnesia, 0.14; siliceous earth, 0.15; and free carbonic acid, 8.69. This spring agrees best with persons suffering from chronic catarrhal affections of the chest, and is taken pure, or with the addition of one-third of milk or whey, in the dose of from three to six tumblersful.
2. The Sauerbrunn, at the back of the Dorotheenau, may rather be called a gas-spring than a water-spring, as the influx of water is very small. The temperature varies between 7° and 12° R. (48 and 59° F.); it contains very few mineral constituents, only 2 grains in 1 lb. of the water, principally siliceous earth, and somewhat over 20 cubic ​inches of carbonic acid gas. The water of this spring forms an agreeable and refreshing beverage during the afternoon in warm weather; it is often used for bathing purposes on account of the quantity of carbonic acid gas it contains (there are four bathing tubs in the building); iron is frequently added to the water for the use of nervous patients suffering from debility and poorness of blood.
3. The Eisenquelle (Chalybeate spring) at the upper part of the Wiesenthal, has a temperature of 8° R. (50° F.); it contains scarcely 2 grains of solid constituents in 1 lb. of the water, and the principal part of these is oxide and biphosphite of iron. It does not contain any carbonic acid gas, and is a pretty strong and pure chalybeate water, used principally for bathing by people suffering from poorness of blood and muscular atrophy. For internal use it is advisable to add about one-third of Giesshübler Sauerbrunn, because if taken pure, it easily causes cardialgic pains.
# Guide through Carlsbad and its environs/The Sprudel-Soap

V.—THE SPRUDEL-SOAP.
This soap is made from the alkaline salt of the water of the Sprudel, and contains some iodine and bromine; it is principally used in chronic diseases of the skin, and as a poultice, either pure or mixed with mud, for the so-called cold abscess. The price of one pound of soap is 1 fl. 20 kr.; the $^1$⁄$_4$ lb. cake is sold at 35 kr.
# Guide to the Current Periodicals and Serials of the United States and Canada

This work was published in five editions, with a number of supplements, from 1907 to 1931. Certain parts of this work are in the public domain in the United States because they were published before 1929.
* A Guide to the Current Periodicals and Serials of the United States and Canada 1907 (1907) External scan External scan External scan
* A Guide to the Current Periodicals and Serials of the United States and Canada 1909 (1908) External scan External scan
* Supplement: Sept 1, 1910 (1910) External scan External scan External scan
* Third Edition (1914) External scan External scan
* Fourth Edition (1920) External scan External scan External scan
* Supplement December 1920 to January 1923 (1923)
# Guide through Carlsbad and its environs/The Mineral Waters for Exportation

VI.—THE MINERAL WATERS FOR EXPORTATION.
Although the waters from all the hot mineral springs are used for exportation, the cooler ones are best suited for this purpose, because they contain more carbonic acid gas, and consequently their water, put into bottles well corked, will keep its strength for several years. This water may be ​used preliminary to the visit to Carlsbad, or after the return from it; it may also be taken by people who are unable to visit Carlsbad, especially by transatlantic patients, and eventually it may be used as a trial in doubtful cases. It is either used cold, or better, each tumblerful is artificially warmed by putting it into hot water, and testing it with a glass thermometer till it has acquired the necessary temperature, that is about 40° R. (122° F.). This is the best way of raising the water to a proper and equal temperature.
To obtain the mineral water direct from Carlsbad, patients should apply to Herrn Lobel Schottländer, at the office for the exportation of the Carlsbad mineral waters. The prices are for cases containing 20 bottles of four tumblers each, 6 fl. or 12 Mk.=12 sh.; 30 bottles, 9 fl. or 18 Mk.=18 sh.; 50 bottles, 13 fl. or 26 Mk.=26 sh.
# Fields v. City of Fairfield

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
375 U.S. 248
Fields v. City of Fairfield
Melvin L. Wulf for appellants.
Burke Marshall for the United States, as amicus curiae, by special leave of Court.
Frank B. Parsons for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fields v. City of Fairfield/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
375 U.S. 248
Fields v. City of Fairfield
The udgment of the Supreme Court of Alabama is reversed. Thompson v. City of Louisville, 362 U.S. 199, 80 S.Ct. 624, 4 L.Ed.2d 654; Garner v. Louisiana, 368 U.S. 157, 82 S.Ct. 248, 7 L.Ed.2d 207.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fields v. South Carolina

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 522
Fields v. South Carolina
Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Matthew J. Perry and Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr., for petitioners.
Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen. of South Carolina, Everett N. Brandon, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Julian S. Wolfe, for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fields v. South Carolina/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 522
Fields v. South Carolina
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of South Carolina is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229, 83 S.Ct. 680.
Mr. Justice CLARK dissents for the reasons expressed in his dissenting opinion in Edwards v. South Carolina, supra.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Freedom to Travel to Cuba Act

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Freedom to Travel to Cuba Act."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Freedom to Travel to Cuba Act - a 2002 bill of US Congress which was not passed
* Freedom to Travel to Cuba Act - a 2009 bill of US Congress which was not passed-
* Freedom to Travel to Cuba Act - a 2015 bill of US Congress which was not passed
# Freeland v. Williams

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
131 U.S. 405
Freeland v. Williams
Chas. C. Cole and W. L. Cole, for plaintiff in error.
Robert White and Chas. J. Faulkner, for defendant in error.
MILLER, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Freeman's Journal

* related portals: periodicals.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
Content exists for this periodical, though at this stage it is not specifically organised beyond a basic hierarchy.
The pages listed below are an automatically generated listing.
Special:PrefixIndex/Freeman's Journal/