OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Meshwerks, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.

* related portals: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
528 F.3d 1258 (10th Cir. 2008)
In this copyright law opinion, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's opinion that 3D models of physical objects, if faithfully and accurately representing the original, are not original enough to warrant copyright protection.
* 528 F.3d 1258
* Meshwerks, Inc.
* v.
* Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc., et al.
* No. 06-4222
* United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit
June 17, 2008
Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court
PUBLISH
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
TENTH CIRCUIT
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Utah (D.C. No. 2:06-CV-97-TC)
Lewis M. Francis (Jerome Romero with him on the briefs) of Jones Waldo Holbrook & McDonough PC, Salt Lake City, Utah, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Brian D. Wassom of Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP, Detroit, Michigan (Michael A. Lisi of Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP, Detroit, Michigan and Arthur B. Berger of Ray Quinney & Nebeker P.C ., Salt Lake City, Utah, with him on the brief), for Defendants-Appellees Toyota Motor Sales, Inc., Grace & Wild, Inc. and Saatchi & Saatchi North America, Inc.
Stephen Quesenberry and J. Bryan Quesenberry of Hill, Johnson & Schmutz, Provo, Utah, for Defendant-Appellee 3D Recon, LLC.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Andrews, Charles Alfred

​Andrews, Charles Alfred, M.A. St. John's Coll., Camb., practises before the High Court of Calcutta, a student of the Inner Temple 10 May, 1870 (then aged 23), called to the bar 25 April, 1877 (youngest son of Henry Andrews, Esq., of Calcutta, late registrar of public works dept. govt. of India); born , 1847.
    Calcutta.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Andrews, John Richard

​Andrews, John Richard, a student of the Middle Temple 30 April, 1853, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1856 (2nd son of Richard Andrews, Esq., of Wolverhampton); born , .
    4, Cornwall Terrace, Regent's Park, N.W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Andrew, Richard Hambley

​Andrew, Richard Hambley, a student of Gray's Inn 6 Jan., 1852, went to the Inner Temple 21 Nov., 1855, where he was called to the bar 26 Jan., 1856 (eldest son of Christopher Thomas Andrew, Esq., of Menkee, Cornwall); born , .
    Tredineck St. Mabyn, Bodmin, Cornwall.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Andrew, William Raeburn St. Clair

​Andrew, William Raeburn St. Clair, M.A., Exeter Coll., Oxon, 1879, B.A. (second class in jurisprudence) 1876, from Harrow, joint author of Conybeare and Andrew's Married Women's Property Acts, a student of the Inner Temple 15 Oct., 1874 (then aged 20), called to the bar 18 Nov., 1878 (2nd son of Sir William Patrick Andrew, Knt., C.I.E., of London); born 22 Oct., 1853; married 28 June, 1877, Frances Gardiner Ramsay, youngest dau. of Henry David Inglis, Esq., of Torsonce, Midlothian.
    17, Carlyle Square, Chelsea, S.W.; 40, Chancery Lane, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Andrew, Alfred Andrew

​Andrew, Alfred Andrew, M.A. Corpus Christi Coll., Camb., a student of Lincoln's Inn 11 Nov., 1867 (then aged 23), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1871 (2nd son of Rev. William Wayte Andrew, M.A., of Wood Hall, Norfolk); born 13 Aug., 1844.
    Cambrian House, St. Lawrence Road, North Kensington, W.; 116, Chancery Lane, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Andrews, John Luckham Williams

​Andrews, John Luckham Williams, undergrad. Hertford Coll., Oxon, a student of Lincoln's Inn 8 Nov., 1873 (then aged 19), called to the bar 25 June, 1879 (4th son of George James Andrews, of Dorchester, solicitor); born , 1854.
    Dorchester.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Andrews, Robert

​Andrews, Robert, a student of the Middle Temple 4 Feb., 1820, called to the bar 20 June, 1828 (only son of Robert Andrews, Esq., of Kibworth, co. Cork, dec.); probably dead.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Andrews, Robert William

​Andrews, Robert William, B.A. Trin. Coll., Dublin, a member of the South-eastern circuit, joint author of Andrews and Stoneys Judicature Acts, a student of the Middle Temple 5 May, 1869, called to the bar 18 Nov., 1872 (son of Robert Andrews, Esq., Q.C. dec., late of Mountjoy Square, Dublin); born 4 Oct., 1846.
    4, Brick Court, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/André, Auguste

​André, Auguste, a student of the Middle Temple 14 April, 1868, called to the bar 10 June, 1870 (2nd son of Jean François Aristide André, of Amelie Cantin, Port Louis, Mauritius, dec.); born , .
    Port Louis, Mauritius.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Andrew, Henry Whitworth

​Andrew, Henry Whitworth, B.A. Christ Coll., Camb., conveyancer and equity draftsman, a student of Lincoln's Inn 25 April, 1876, called to the bar 27 Jan., 1879 (only son of Henry Andrew, late of Truro, Cornwall, surgeon, dec.); born , .
    Hardingstone, Northampton; 4, New Square, W.C.
# Morgan v. Curtenius (60 U.S. 8)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
60 U.S. 8
Morgan v. Curtenius
Upon examining the transcript of the record filed in this case, we find that it is imperfect, and that a paper has been omitted which may be important to the decision of the matter in controversy between the parties.
The bill of exceptions upon which the cause is brought before this court, after stating that the defendants read in evidence the deed from Bogardas, to Underhill, under which they claim title, proceeds in the following words:
'The defendants next offered in evidence to the jury a certificate of the register of the land office at Quincy, dated _____, which is in the words and figures following, to wit.'
But the certificate thus referred to is not inserted in the exception, nor its contents stated in any part of the transcript. And as this paper was offered in evidence by the defendants, it must have been deemed material to their defence; and the court think it would not be just to them to proceed to final judgment, without having this paper before us.
And as the defendants have no counsel appearing in their behalf in this court, the court of its own motion order the case to be continued, and a certiorari issued in the usual form to the Circuit Court, directing it to supply the omission above mentioned, and return a full and correct transcript to this court, on or before the first day of the next term.
Upon an inspection of the record of this cause, it appearing to the court here that the bill of exceptions states that 'the defendants offered in evidence to the jury a certificate of the register of the land office at Quincy, dated _____, which is in the words and figures following, to wit;' and that the said certificate, thus referred to, is not inserted in the exception, nor its contents stated in any part of the transcript, on consideration whereof, it is now here ordered by this court, that a writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby awarded, to be issued forthwith, and to be directed to the judges of the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Illinois, commanding them to supply the omission above mentioned, and return a full and correct transcript to this court, with this writ, on or before the first day of the next term of this court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Morgan v. Commissioner Of Internal Revenue

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
309 U.S. 626
MORGAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
Argued: Jan. 4, 5, 1940. --- Decided: Jan 29, 1940
As Amended on Denial of Rehearing Feb. 26, 1940.
Mr. Brode B. Davis, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.
Mr. Richard H. Demuth, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS, delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Morgan v. Curtenius

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Morgan v. Curtenius."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Morgan v. Curtenius (60 U.S. 8)
* Morgan v. Curtenius (61 U.S. 1)
# Morgan v. Curtenius (60 U.S. 8)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
60 U.S. 8
Morgan v. Curtenius
THIS case stood upon the trial docket, coming from the State of Illinois. It was submitted on a printed argument by Mr. Washburne for the plaintiff in error, no counsel appearing for the defendant.
Whereupon, upon an inspection of the record, the court expressed the following opinion:
Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Morgan v. Curtenius (61 U.S. 1)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
61 U.S. 1
Morgan v. Curtenius
THIS case was brough up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Illinois.
It was the same case which was before the court at the preceding term, as noticed in 19 Howard, 8.
The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
It was argued by Mr. Washburne for the plaintiff in error, and Mr. Ballance for the defendant, upon printed arguments.
Mr. Washburne referred to the cases of Frisby v. Ballance 2 Gilman, 141, and Frink v. Davit, 14 Illinois Reports, 304; and contended that the last decision had declared the law of the State, by which the deed of Bogardus to Underhill did not, by the subsequently-acquired title of Bogardus, pass the title in fee. The decision of the Circuit Court should be reversed, as being contradictory to the established law of the State.
Mr. Ballance admitted that the United States courts could follow the State courts in the construction of their own statutes, and, when a new construction was adopted, could change and decide cases as they might arise, according to the new construction. But he denied that the Supreme Court could gather up all the old cases which had been settled under the law as it then stood, and make them conform to the new law.
Mr. Justice GRIER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Morgan v. Devine

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
237 U.S. 632
Morgan v. Devine
Argued: April 7, 1915. --- Decided: June 1, 1915
Assistant Attorney General Wallace for appellant.
Messrs. A. E. Dempsey, Turner W. Bell, and Robert B. Troutman for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 633-635 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mold Web Course/Chapter 4/Lesson 2

​Lesson 2Assess Mold Problem
Before planning a remediation effort, the size and extent of the mold problem and any continuing moisture problems should be assessed. Remediations generally can be divided into small (less than 10 square feet of mold), medium (10-100 square feet of mold), and large jobs (more than 100 square feet of mold). A remediation manager should be selected for medium or large jobs. You may choose to involve an experienced health and safety professional in remediation projects, particularly on large or complex jobs.
Questions to consider before starting remediation include:
* Are there existing moisture problems in the building?
* Have building materials been wet more than 48 hours?
* Are there hidden sources of water, or is the humidity high enough to cause condensation?
* Are the building occupants reporting musty or moldy odors?
* Are the building occupants reporting health problems?
* Are building materials or furnishings visibly damaged?
* Has maintenance been delayed or has the maintenance plan been altered?
* Has the building been remodeled recently, or has its use changed?
* Are consultations with health professionals indicated?
Remediating mold and moisture problems may be complex, and it may increase workers' exposure to mold unless personal protective equipment (PPE) is used.
| | Avoid Mold Exposure |
| ● | Do not touch mold or moldy items with your bare hands. | click to enlarge |
| ● | Do not get mold or mold spores in your eyes. | click to enlarge |
| ● | Avoid breathing in mold or mold spores. | click to enlarge |
| ● | Consider using PPE if distributing mold during a building inspection, assessment, or walkthrough, for example. The minimum PPE is an N-95 respirator (available at most hardware stores), gloves, and goggles. | click to enlarge |
| ● | Review guidelines for using containment and PPE before starting remediation. (see Table 2) | click to enlarge |
Remediation workers, especially if they have health concerns, may want to check with their doctors before working on a mold investigation or remediation project. Anyone who has any doubts or questions should consult a healthcare professional before beginning work on a remediation project. See Chapter 6, Lesson 4, for more information on PPE.
# Mold Web Course/Chapter 4/Lesson 3

​Lesson 3Remediation Plan
The highest priority in a remediation is to protect the health and safety of the building occupants and the remediation workers. Remediation plans vary according to the size and complexity of the job. They may require updating if circumstances change or more extensive contamination is discovered.
The remediation plan should include:
* Whether containment will be required.
* What level of PPE will be used.
* How the water or moisture problem will be fixed so the mold problem does not recur.
* How the moldy building materials will be removed to avoid spreading mold.
# Mold Web Course/Chapter 5/Lesson 2

​Lesson 2Mold Remediation in Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Systems
Mold remediation involving a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system should be done only by professionals experienced in working with HVAC systems. Professionals may have several different methods and techniques for approaching HVAC remediation. As with the rest of a mold remediation project, professional judgment is required when working with HVAC systems, and professionals may use materials, methods, and techniques not mentioned in this course.
An HVAC system found to be contaminated with mold should be turned off and not used until the system has been remediated; using a mold-contaminated HVAC system may spread mold throughout the building and increase the exposure of building occupants. (There may be some exceptions or instances when all or part or the HVAC system can be run, based on professional judgment, if there is no risk of increasing occupant or worker exposure). If possible, the HVAC system should be remediated during off hours when the building is not in use.
Effective containment of the area served by the ventilation system is important to avoid the spread of mold and mold-contaminated materials. All intakes and supply vents should be sealed with plastic and tape, and negative air pressure should be maintained in work areas. (A fan can be used.) Contaminated porous materials in the HVAC system should be bagged and removed. Materials that can be cleaned should be vacuumed with a HEPA vacuum or cleaned with a moist cloth and detergent solution. All items should be dried promptly.
If you consider duct cleaning, first consult EPA's guide Should You Have the Air Ducts in Your Home Cleaned? (See the Resource List.)
# Mold Web Course/Chapter 4/Lesson 4

​Lesson 4Mold Remediation Procedures
A variety of methods are available to remediate damage to buildings and furnishings caused by moisture-control problems and mold. The procedures selected depend on the size of the moldy area and the type of contaminated materials. Budget may also be a concern. The methods presented in this section outline one approach; some professionals may prefer to use other methods. If possible, remediation activities should be scheduled during off-hours, when building occupants are less likely to be affected.
Cleanup methods may include:
Wet Vacuum Wet, or water-extraction, vacuums are designed to collect water. They can be used to remove water that has accumulated on floors, carpets, and hard surfaces. Wet vacuums should be used only when materials are still wet, otherwise they may spread mold spores. Wet vacuums alone will not dry carpets. Wet carpets must be pulled up and dried, then reinstalled. The carpet padding also must be dried. The tanks, hoses, and attachments of wet vacuums should be thoroughly cleaned and dried after use because mold and mold spores may stick to their surfaces.
Damp Wipe Mold can generally be removed from hard surfaces by wiping or scrubbing with water and detergent. Always follow the cleaning instructions on product labels. Surfaces cleaned by damp wiping should be dried quickly and thoroughly to discourage further mold growth. Porous materials that are wet and have mold growing on them may have to be discarded. Because mold will infiltrate porous substances and grow on or fill in empty spaces or crevices, completely removing mold can be difficult, if not impossible. Mold can also cause staining and other cosmetic damage.
HEPA Vacuum High-Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) vacuums are recommended for the final clean up of remediation areas after materials have been thoroughly dried and contaminated materials have been removed. HEPA vacuums are also recommended for cleaning up dust that has settled outside the remediation area. When changing the vacuum filter, workers should wear PPE to prevent exposure to mold that has been captured in the vacuum. (See Lesson 4 in Chapter 6 of this course.) The filter and contents of the HEPA vacuum must be disposed of in well-sealed plastic bags. Care must be taken to ensure that the new filter is properly seated on the vacuum so there are no leaks.
Throw Away Damaged Materials Mold-contaminated building materials that cannot be salvaged should be double-bagged in 6-mil or thicker polyethylene bags. The bagged materials usually can be discarded as ordinary construction waste. Packaging mold-contaminated materials in sealed bags before removing them from the containment area is important to minimize the spread of mold spores throughout the building. Large items that have heavy mold growth should be covered with polyethylene sheeting and sealed with duct tape before being removed from the containment area.
# Mold Web Course/Chapter 5/Knowledge Test

​CHAPTER 5: LARGE AREAS AND OTHER SPECIAL CONCERNS Knowledge Test Lesson 1 Remediating Large Areas of Mold Contamination Question 1: Full containment requires:
    A.Double‐layer polyethylene sheeting
    B.A decontamination chamber
    C.Respirators to be worn inside the containment area
    D.All of the above
Lesson 2 Mold Remediation in Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning (HVAC) Systems Question 2: Mold‐contaminated HVAC systems should be assessed by professionals.
    A.True
    B.False
Lesson 3 Confined Spaces Question 3: Remediation projects in confined spaces require increased worker training to prevent problems due to poor lighting, communication, and mobility in the space.
    A.True
B.False
​Answer Key
1: Answer: “D” All of the above
Containment should be designed to prevent the movement of mold spores from one area of the building to another. www.epa.gov/mold/moldcourse/chapter5.html#5.1
Question 2: Answer: “A” TRUE
Mold remediation involving a heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system should be done only by professionals experienced in working with HVAC systems. www.epa.gov/mold/moldcourse/chapter5.html#5.2
Question 3: Answer: “A” TRUE
In general, work in confined spaces should be conducted only by trained professionals who have the equipment required by OSHA to deal with the inherent dangers in this type of environment. www.epa.gov/mold/moldcourse/chapter5.html#5.3
# Mold Web Course/Chapter 5/Lesson 1

​Lesson 1Remediating Large Areas of Mold Contamination
For large or complex mold remediation jobs, you may consider hiring professionals who have experience working on large mold remediation projects, particularly since extensive containment and PPE may be needed. Be sure to check references and ensure that the professional has experience working in mold remediation situations. Remediators should follow EPA mold remediation guidance or other government or professional remediation guidance. Building occupants need to be informed about what is going to happen, when it will happen, and how they may be affected.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Hewetson, Joseph Hyacinth

​Hewetson, Joseph Hyacinth, B.A. Caius Coll., Camb., a student of the Inner Temple 22 April, 1872 (then aged 20), called to the bar 30 April, 1875 (elder son of William Hewetson, Esq., of Port Louis, Mauritius); born , 1852.
    Port Louis, Mauritius.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Hewitt, Edgar Percy

​Hewitt, Edgar Percy, undergrad. St. John's Coll., Oxon, matric. London Univ. 1882, goes the Midland circuit, a student of Lincoln's Inn 7 Aug., 1878 (then aged 19), called to the bar 6 June, 1883 (2nd son of William Henry Hewitt, Esq., of London); born , 1859.
    2, Mitre Court Buildings, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Hewitt, Henry Marmaduke

​Hewitt, Henry Marmaduke, M.A., LL.M., St. John's Coll., Camb., 1869, 1st class classical tripos 1866, 1st class moral science tripos 1866, theological honours 1867, qualified for gold medal in classics, M.A. London Univ 1869 and a member of Convocation, assistant classical examiner London Univ. 1877–82, a student of Gray's Inn 5 Nov., 1875, went to the Inner Temple 11 Oct., 1876 (then aged 34), where he was called to the bar 3 July, 1878 (eldest son of Cornelius Hewitt, of Kingston-upon-Hull, gentleman); born 18 July, 1842; married 19 July, 1884, Agnes Helen, only surviving child of late George Liddon, Esq., of Clifton, Bristol.
    3, Pump Court, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Hewlett, Richard

​Hewlett, Richard, a member of Civil Service Commission since 31 March, 1862, undergrad. Corpus Christi Coll., Camb., from King's Coll., London, editor of some volumes in series of Chronicles and Memorials of Great Britain, published under the direction of the master of the rolls, a student of the Middle Temple 10 Aug., 1863, called to the bar 6 June, 1871 (2nd son of Samuel Burt Howlett, chief draftsman in the War Office, London); born 17 Aug., 1841; married 5 Oct., 1871, Alice, 3rd dau. of late James Holderness Featherstone, Esq., of Reading.
    30, Widmore Road, Bromley, Kent; Civil Service Commission, Whitehall, S.W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Hervey, Robert Kibble

​Hervey, Robert Kibble, B.A. London Univ. 1851 and a member of Convocation, equity draftsman and conveyancer, a student of the Inner Temple 14 Jan., 1852 (then aged 22), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1855 (eldest son of Robert Hervey, Esq., of Lee Hall, Cheshire); born , 1830; married 26 March, 1864, Mary Clayton, eldest dau. of J. H. Law, Esq., of Bowdon, Cheshire.
    143, Holland Road, Kensington, W.; 11, Old Square, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Hewick, John Edwin

​Hewick, John Edwin, a student of the Middle Temple 14 Nov., 1877, called to the bar 9 June, 1880 (only son of John Anson Hewick, of Ripley, Yorks, gentleman, dec.); born , .
    3, Middle Temple Lane, E.C.