OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Taylor, John

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Taylor, John."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* articles in the Dictionary of National Biography:
** "Taylor, John (1503?-1554)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
** "Taylor, John (d.1534)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
** "Taylor, John (1580-1653)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
** "Taylor, John (1600?-1655)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
** "Taylor, John (1694-1761)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
** "Taylor, John (1703-1772)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
** "Taylor, John (1704-1766)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
** "Taylor, John (1711-1788)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
** "Taylor, John (1739-1838)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
** "Taylor, John (1750-1826)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
** "Taylor, John (1757-1832)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
** "Taylor, John (1771-1843)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
** "Taylor, John (1781-1864)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
** "Taylor, John (d.1808)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
** "Taylor, John (1829-1893)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
* articles in A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature:
** "Taylor, John," in A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature, by John William Cousin, London: J. M. Dent & Sons (1910)
For works by or about people named John Taylor, see Author:John Taylor.
# Taylor v. Alabama

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Murphy
United States Supreme Court
335 U.S. 252
Taylor v. Alabama
Argued: April 30, May 3, 1948. --- Decided: June 21, 1948
[Syllabus from pages 252-254 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Nesbitt Elmore, of Montgomery, Ala., and Thurgood Marshall, of New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Bernard F. Sykes, of Montgomery, Ala., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BURTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Taylor Company v. Anderson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
275 U.S. 431
Taylor Company v. Anderson
Argued: Dec. 5, 1927. --- Decided: Jan 3, 1928
Mr. Henry S. Drinker, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from Pages 432 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Hobart P. Young, of Chicago, Ill., for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from Page 434 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Starr v. Long

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
227 U.S. 613
Starr v. Long
Argued: January 28, 1913. --- Decided: February 24, 1913
Mr. R. W. Starr, pro se, and Mr. Frank Reeves for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. A. G. Avery and F. T. Post for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice Pitney delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Starr v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Starr v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Starr v. United States (153 U.S. 614)
* Starr v. United States (164 U.S. 627)
# Starr v. Campbell

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
208 U.S. 527
Starr v. Campbell
Argued: January 24, 1908. --- Decided: February 24, 1908
Mr. W. M. Tomkins for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 527-528 intentionally omitted]
Solicitor General Hoyt for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 528-529 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Charles Quarles and Francis H. De Groat as amici curice.
Mr. Justice Mckenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Starrett’s Case

* related portals: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
STARRETT's Cafe.
H
Yeates and C. Smith opposed the motion, and contended, that there was a distinction between an arrest on mesne and on judicial, process; for, though, in the former case, the Court would discharge a sutor, witness,&c. from an arrest made during an attendance upon them, yet, in the latter, they would not, becaufe the party would afterwards be remediless. Wood's lest. 503. 600. 4. Com. Dig. 475. 11 Mod. 234. 252. There is, likewise, another reason: the Capias on mesne process might be taken out merely on a suggestion ; but on judicial process, the debt is certain, and fixed by the judgment of the Court.
Chambers and Hartley, in reply. The protection, of suitors &c. is established to promote an equal administration of justice, and to prevent the oppression of a rich and powerful man, over a poor one who is soliciting justice. There is no express authority that extends the doctrine to this case; but in 4 Cum. 575. tit. Priv. it is laid down, that an execution shall not be discharge, he shall himself be committed. The books cited in Comyms, Crompton and Wood's Inst. are of little authority. ​ M‘KEAN, Chieƒ Justice.– Wood is a writer of great authority, and frequently cited with respect in Westminister-Hall. In the case before us, the execution has regularly issued, upon a judgment regularly obtained; and although we should certainly protect suitors, witnesses, and jurors, from an arrest on mesne process, during their attendance upon the Court, and for a reasonable time in coming and going, yet no cafe has been shewn, which will justify our interference, to discharge a man taken in execution on the ground of such a protection. It is,indeed, the privilege of the Court that is infringed ; and, it is discretionary, to grant it on some occasions, and to refuse it upon others.
by the court:–The prisoner must be remanded.
# Talmud (Rodkinson)/Seder Moed/Tractate Shabbat 2 b

Why is this teaching here specified as two respectively four on the inside, and two respectively four on the outside, and there no such specification was made? Said R. Papa: Here the special subject of treatment is the Sabbath, and the Mishna enumerated the cases which involve guilt and those which do not involve guilt; while there the principal subject of treatment is a different one, and he mentions only the cases that involve guilt, leaving the cases that do not involve guilt untouched. But the cases that involve guilt are those by which acts of transfer are committed, and such are only two? Nay, there are two acts of transfer from within and two from without. But the Mishna says, "Yetziath" (which in a literal sense means transfer from within)? Said R. Ashi: The Tana calls transfer from without by the same term. And for what reason? Because every act of removing a thing from its place is called Yetziah. Said Rabbina: The Mishna also bears out this sense; for it speaks of Yetziath and immediately illustrates its remark by citing a case from without. This bears it out. Rabha, however, says: He (the Tana) speaks about divided premises (whose line of division is crossed), and in this case there are only two (in each of which there may be four acts of transfer).
Said R. Mathna to Abayi: Are there not eight, even twelve (instances of transfer over the line of division)?$^3$
# Talty v. Freedman's Savings and Trust Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
93 U.S. 321
Talty v. Freedman's Savings and Trust Company
ERROR to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.
This was replevin by the plaintiff to recover a collateral security pledged to one Kendig, a broker, and by him sold to the defendant. Under the instructions of the court below, the jury found a verdict for the defendant; judgment was rendered thereon, and the plaintiff sued out this writ of error. The facts are fully set forth in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Joseph H. Bradley for the plaintiff in error.
The chattel replevied was a mere chose in action, and was not assigned by the owner. His indorsement in blank did not, at law, transfer any title to it.
Kendig had merely the option to purchase the collateral if the note was not paid.
If the plaintiff's testimony was true, no tender or offer of payment to the defendant was necessary. Wilson v. Little et al., 2 Comst. 443.
Mr. Enoch Totten for the defendant in error.
The rule of exemption as to tender does not apply in a suit against a bona fide purchaser to recover possession of the pledge. Tender to the defendant of the amount due by the plaintiff on his note was necessary to enable him to recover. Demainbray v. Metcalf, 2 Vern. 691; Little v. Baker, Hoff. Ch. 487; Jarvis's Adm. v. Rodgers, 15 Mass. 408; Baldwin v. Ely, 9 How. 580; 3 Pars. on Contr. 274; Story on Bailm., sect. 327; Lewis v. Mott, 36 N. Y. 395; Donald v. Suckling, Law Rep. 1 Q. B. 585; Johnson v. Stear, 15 C. B. N. S. 330.
MR. JUSTICE SWAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Talmud (Rodkinson)/Seder Moed/Tractate Shabbat 3 a

And he rejoined: Such transfers as involve the obligation of a sin-offering are counted; but those that do not involve such an obligation are not counted.
"They are both free." Was not the act (of transfer) committed by both? Said R. Hyya bar Gamda: The act of removing the thing was committed by the joint efforts of both, and they (the rabbis) said: "It is written in the law, when a person did it"4--i.e., when one person commits the act he is culpable, but when an act is committed by the joint efforts of two persons, they are both free.
Rabh questioned Rabbi: If one were laden by his friend with eatables and beverages and carried them outside (of the house), how is the law? Is the removing of his body tantamount to the removing of a thing from its place, and therefore he is culpable, or is it not so?
# Tam Glen (1)

TAM GLEN.
YOUNG DUNOIS.
Merrily Oh!
The Soldier’s Dream.
Go where Glory waits thee.
GLASGOW:
PRINTED FOR THE BOOKSELLERS,
1823.
* Tam Glen
* Young Dunois
* Merrily oh!
* The soldier's dream
* Go where glory waits thee
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tam Glen (1)/Merrily oh!

MERRILY OH!
Merrily every bosom boundeth, Merrily oh! merrily oh! ​Where the song of freedom soundeth, Merrily oh! merrily oh! There the warrior's arms Shed more splendour, There the maidens chains Shine more tender, Every joy the land surroundeth, Merrily oh! merrily oh!
Wearily every bosom pineth, Wearily oh! wearily oh! Where the bond of slavery twineth, Wearily oh wearily oh! There the warrior's dart Hath no fleetness, There the maiden's heart Hath no sweetness,
Every flower of life declineth, Wearily oh! wearily oh!
Cheerily then from hill and valley, Cheerily oh! cheerily oh! From your native mountains sally, Cheerily oh! cheerily oh! If a glorious death Won by bravery, Sweeter be than breath Sigh'd in slavery, ​Round the flag of freedom rally, Cheerily oh! cheerily oh!
# Tam Glen (1)/Go where glory waits thee

GO WHERE GLORY WAITS THEE.
Go where glory waits thee, But while fame elates thee, ⟨Oh!⟩ still remember me. Where the praise thou meetest, To thine ear is sweetest, Oh! then remember me. Other arms may press thee, Dearer friend caress thee, All the joys that bless thee, Sweet as far may be; But when friends are nearest, And, when joys are dearest, Children remember me.
​When at eve thou rovest, By the star thou lovest, Oh! then remember me. Think when home returning, Bright we've seen it burning, Oh! then remember me. Of as summer closes, When thine eye reposes On ts ling ring roses, Once so lov'd by thee: Think on her who wove them, Her who made thee love them, Oh! then remember me.
When around the dying, Autumn leaves are lying, Oh! then remember me. And at night, when gazing On the gay hearth blazing, O ! then remember me. Then should music stealing All the soul of feeling. To thy heart appealing, Draw one tear from thee; Then let memory bring thee, Strains I us'd to sing thee. Oh! then remember me.
FINIS.
# Statutes at Large

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Statutes at Large."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* The Statutes at Large (1763-1765), collection of British legislation by Owen Ruffhead
* The Statutes at Large (1762-1766), collection of British legislation by Danby Pickering
* United States Statutes at Large (1845-present), official record of the United States Congress
# Statutes in Force/Guide to the Edition

Guide to the Edition:
* 1 June 1972
* 1 August 1981
Additional notes:
* 1 September 1983
* 1 January 1983
* 1 November 1984
List of commencement orders
This work is licensed under the United Kingdom Open Government Licence v3.0.
    You are free to:
   * copy, publish, distribute and transmit the Information;
   * adapt the Information;
   * exploit the Information commercially and non-commercially for example, by combining it with other Information, or by including it in your own product or application.
    You must, where you do any of the above:
   * acknowledge the source of the Information in your product or application by including or linking to any attribution statement specified by the Information Provider(s) and, where possible, provide a link to this licence.
   * If the Information Provider does not provide a specific attribution statement, you must use the following:
    Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
    This license does NOT cover:
   * personal data in the Information;
   * Information that has not been accessed by way of publication or disclosure under information access legislation (including the Freedom of Information Acts for the UK and Scotland) by or with the consent of the Information Provider;
   * departmental or public sector organisation logos, crests and the Royal Arms except where they form an integral part of a document or dataset;
   * military insignia;
   * third party rights the Information Provider is not authorised to license;
   * other intellectual property rights, including patents, trade marks, and design rights; and
   * identity documents such as the British Passport.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Statutes in Force/Guide to the Edition/1 January 1983

STATUTES IN FORCE
GUIDE TO THE EDITION
dated 1st August 1981
ADDITIONAL NOTE
1st January 1983
(to be filed immediately following the Guide)
NEWLY ENACTED ACTS.
The Editorial Board have decided that whenever practicable newly enacted Acts should, when first published in Statutes in Force, be issued in their complete text form as it stands at the date of Royal Assent. This departure from the former practice is being made in order to improve the speed of publication of newly enacted Acts in the Edition and to provide users with the full statutory wording relating to textual amendments made to other enactments. These amendments will of course also continue to be carried through to the affected enactments in cumulative supplements and in revised re-issues of extensively amended Acts in the normal way. This new practice applies to newly enacted Acts passed after 1st December, 1982, and additionally to the Criminal Justice Act 1982 (c.48).
CHANGE OF ADDRESS
The Statutory Publications Office has moved from Buckingham Gate and communications to the Editor should now be addressed as follows:-
    The Editor
    Statutory Publications Office
    Queen Anne's Chambers
    28 Broadway
    London SW1H 9JS
MARCH 1983
LONDON: HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE.
This work is licensed under the United Kingdom Open Government Licence v3.0.
    You are free to:
   * copy, publish, distribute and transmit the Information;
   * adapt the Information;
   * exploit the Information commercially and non-commercially for example, by combining it with other Information, or by including it in your own product or application.
    You must, where you do any of the above:
   * acknowledge the source of the Information in your product or application by including or linking to any attribution statement specified by the Information Provider(s) and, where possible, provide a link to this licence.
   * If the Information Provider does not provide a specific attribution statement, you must use the following:
    Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
    This license does NOT cover:
   * personal data in the Information;
   * Information that has not been accessed by way of publication or disclosure under information access legislation (including the Freedom of Information Acts for the UK and Scotland) by or with the consent of the Information Provider;
   * departmental or public sector organisation logos, crests and the Royal Arms except where they form an integral part of a document or dataset;
   * military insignia;
   * third party rights the Information Provider is not authorised to license;
   * other intellectual property rights, including patents, trade marks, and design rights; and
   * identity documents such as the British Passport.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Statutes concerning forcible entries and riots confirmed

* information about this edition.
* related portals: England, Law.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
This Act is written in the Anglo-Norman language.

## Original text

Item accordez est & assentuz q lestatuz & ordeinances faitz & nient repellez de ceux q font entrees a forte mayn en tres & tentz ou auts possessions qconqes & lour teignent einz ove force, & auxint de ceux q font insurreccions ou gantz chivaches riotes routes ou assemblees en destourbance de la pees ou de la coe lay ou en affray du poeple, soient tenuz & gardez & pleynement executz; ajouste ycelles a toutz les foitz q tielx forcibles entrees soient faitz, & pleint en veigne a Justices de la pees ou a ascun de eux q mesmes les Justices ou Justice pignent ou pigne poair sufficeant du Conte, & voisent ou voise al lieu ou tiel force soit fait, & sils troevent ou troeve ascuns q teignent tiel lieu forciblement, aps tiel entree faitz, soient pris & mys en pscheine gaole a y demrer convict p record des mesmes les Justices ou Justice tanqils eient fait fyn & ranceon au Roy; & q toutz gentz du Conte sibn Viscont come auts soient entendantz as ditz Justices pur aler & enforcier mesmes les Justices pur arester tielx malfesours sur peine demprisonement & de faire fyn au Roy. Et en mesmes le mane soit fait de ceux q font tielx forcibles entrees en benefices ou offices de seinte Esglise.

## Translation into English

Item, it is accorded and assented, that the ordinances and statutes, made and not repealed, of them that make entries with strong hand into lands and tenements, or other possessions whatsoever, and hold them with force, and also of those that make insurrections, or great ridings, riots, routs, or assemblies, in disturbance of the peace, or of the common law, or in affray of the people, shall be holden and kept, and fully executed; joined to the same, that at all times that such forcible entry shall be made, and complaint thereof cometh to the justices of the peace, or to any of them, that the same justices or justice take sufficient power of the county, and go to the place where such force is made; and if they find any that hold such place forcibly after such entry made, they shall be taken and put in the next gaol, there to abide convict of the record of the same justices or justice, until they have made fine and ransom to the king: and that all the people of the county, as well as the sheriffs as other, shall be attendant upon the same justices to go and assist the same justices to arrest such offenders, upon pain of imprisonment, and to make fine to the King. And in the same manner it shall be done of them that make such forcible entries in benefices or offices of Holy Church.
This work is in the public domain worldwide because it was created by a public body of the United Kingdom with Crown Status and commercially published before 1974.
See Crown copyright artistic works, Crown copyright non-artistic works and List of Public Bodies with Crown Status.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Statutes in Force

* related portals: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
This work was published by Her Majesty's Stationery Office from 1972 onwards.
Statutes in Force was a series of booklets or pamphlets that were collected in ring binders.
* Binder
* Guide to the Edition
* Lists of Groups and Acts and Measures
This work is licensed under the United Kingdom Open Government Licence v3.0.
    You are free to:
   * copy, publish, distribute and transmit the Information;
   * adapt the Information;
   * exploit the Information commercially and non-commercially for example, by combining it with other Information, or by including it in your own product or application.
    You must, where you do any of the above:
   * acknowledge the source of the Information in your product or application by including or linking to any attribution statement specified by the Information Provider(s) and, where possible, provide a link to this licence.
   * If the Information Provider does not provide a specific attribution statement, you must use the following:
    Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
    This license does NOT cover:
   * personal data in the Information;
   * Information that has not been accessed by way of publication or disclosure under information access legislation (including the Freedom of Information Acts for the UK and Scotland) by or with the consent of the Information Provider;
   * departmental or public sector organisation logos, crests and the Royal Arms except where they form an integral part of a document or dataset;
   * military insignia;
   * third party rights the Information Provider is not authorised to license;
   * other intellectual property rights, including patents, trade marks, and design rights; and
   * identity documents such as the British Passport.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse