OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/11th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 4

Chap. IV.—An Act supplementary to an act, entituled “An act making appropriations for carrying into effect a treaty between the United States and the Chickasaw tribe of Indians; and to establish a land-office in the Mississippi territory.”
Act of March 3, 1807, ch. 35. Lands ceded by the Cherokees, &c. &c. to be offered for sale. Reservations, &c.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That so much of the lands ceded to the United States by the Cherokee and Chickasaw Indians, as lies within the Mississippi territory, and for which a land-office was directed to be established, by the second section of the act to which this act is a supplement, shall, with the exception of section number sixteen in each township, which shall be reserved for the use of schools within the same, and with the exception of the salt springs and lands contiguous thereto, which, by the direction of the President of the United States, may be reserved for the future disposal of the said United States, be offered for sale to the highest bidder, under the direction of the register of the land-office and of the receiver of public monies, at the place where the land-office is established; and on the day or days which shall have been designated by proclamation of the President of the United States for that purpose, the sales shall remain open for six weeks, and no longer; the lands shall not be sold for less than two dollars an acre, and shall be sold in tracts of the same size, and in all respects on the same terms and conditions as have been or may be by law provided for the sale of the other public lands in the Mississippi territory. All theThe sales to remain open for six weeks, after which the lands may be sold at private sale. Act of March 3, 1803. lands of the United States in the said district, with the exceptions above mentioned, remaining unsold at the close of the public sales, may be disposed of at private sale, by the register of the land-office, in the same manner, under the same regulations, for the same price, and on the same terms and conditions as are or may be provided by law, for the sale of the lands of the United States in the Mississippi territory; and patents shall be obtained for lands sold in said district, in the same manner, and on the same terms as are provided by law for other public lands sold in the Mississippi territory.
Compensation to superintendents of sales.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the superintendents of the public sales, directed by this act, shall each receive six dollars a day, for every day’s attendance on the said sales.
Approved, June 15, 1809.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/11th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 11

Chap. XI.—An Act to prescribe the mode in which application shall be made for the purchase of land at the several land-offices; and for the relief of Joab Garret.
Mode prescribed for the purchase at private sale of the public lands after June 1, 1810.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That, from and after the first day of June next, every person making application at any of the land-offices of the United States, for the purchase at private sale of a tract of land, shall produce to the register a memorandum in writing, describing the tract, which he shall enter by the proper number of the section, half section, or quarter, (as the case may be,) and of the township and range, subscribing his name thereto, which memorandum the register shall file and preserve in his office.
Joab Garret may withdraw his entry.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That Joab Garret shall be permitted to withdraw his entry, made on the second day of September, one thousand eight hundred and seven, at the land-office at Vincennes, from the northwest quarter section, number two, township number seven, south range number seven west; and the money paid by him on the said entry, shall be placed to his credit, on any purchase he shall or may have made of public land in the same district.
Approved, February 24, 1810.
# United States v. Hathaway/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
71 U.S. 404
United States v. Hathaway
The construction given to the clause of the treaty by the government excluded the article in question from the free list, and subjected it to the duty of the existing tariff law, which was in the present instance the act of 1862. The regulations of the Secretary of the Treasury declared, that articles of wood entered under the designations of the treaty remained liable to the duty, if manufactured, in whole or in part, by planing, shaving, turning, splitting, or riving, or any process of manufacture, other than rough-hewing or sawing. #fn-s-s
We think this a sound construction of the words of the clause. The treaty admits free of duty, 'timber and lumber of all kinds,' with certain specified limitations, 'round, hewed, and sawed;' which limitations, as respects this branch of the clause, are determined either by the form, or by the work bestowed on the article,-the timber or lumber must be round, hewed, or sawed; if neither, then the article is not brought within the description, and if otherwise brought within it, there is still a further limitation,-'unmanufactured, in whole or in part.' The article may be round, hewn, or sawed, but if it has undergone the process of manufacture, even in part, it is taken out of the free list.
In the present case the article is prepared by splitting for the hand of the cooper, in the manufacture of the pipe or hogshead, a process which has the effect to relieve him from much of the labor that would otherwise be required in adapting it to the use intended. It has been already reduced to the proper form and size-a work which, in the first stages of the manufacture of the hogshead, must be done, and by which a considerable advance is made in fitting and finishing it for the market.
As this treaty has been annulled, the question is no longer of any general importance; and as we concur in the interpretation given to it by the Secretary of the Treasury, it is unnecessary to extend this opinion.
IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.
At the same time with the preceding case was disposed of another, coming, like it, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan, on a division of opinion of the judges. It was thus—
# United States v. Healey

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
160 U.S. 136
United States v. Healey
Asst. Atty. Gen. Dodge, for the United States.
Harvey Spalding, for appellee.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Hastings

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
296 U.S. 188
United States v. Hastings
Argued: Nov. 12, 1935. --- Decided: Dec 9, 1935
[Syllabus from pages 188-190 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Joseph B. Keenan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.
Mr. James M. Beck, of Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Hayman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
342 U.S. 205
United States v. Hayman
Argued: Oct. 15, 1951. --- Decided: Jan 7, 1952
[Syllabus from pages 205-206 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Robert L. Stern, Washington, D.C., for the United States.
Mr. Paul A. Freund, Cambridge, Mass., for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice VINSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Haynes

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
130 U.S. 653
United States v. Haynes
This was an action brought by the United States against the principal and sureties on the official bond of a collector of customs, to recover the sum of $634.60, which he had refused to pay over, and claimed the right to retain as part of the emoluments of his office. The circuit court gave judgment for the defendants, and the United States sued out this writ of error, which the defendants in error now move to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
Sol. Gen. Jenks, for plaintiff in error.
Chas. W. Ogden, for defendants in error.
GRAY, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Haynes/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
130 U.S. 653
United States v. Haynes
The motion to dismiss must be granted. The amount in dispute is less than $5,000; and the case does not come within any of the classes specified in section 699 of the Revised Statutes, in which this court has appellate jurisdiction without regard to the sum or value in dispute. The only subdivisions which could possibly be supposed to cover this case are the second and third. The second subdivision relates to judgments 'in any civil action brought by the United States for the enforcement of any revenue law thereof;' and, as was directly adjudged in the recent case of U.S. v Hill, 123 U.S. 681, 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 308, a suit upon an official bond is not an action for the enforcement of a revenue law of the United States. The third subdivision relates to judgments 'in any civil action against any officer of the revenue, for any act done by him in the performance of his official duty, or for the recovery of any money exacted by or paid to him which shall have been paid into the treasury.' This applies only to suits, whether sounding in tort or in contract, brought by individuals or corporations against officers of the revenue acting on behalf of the United States, and does not include any suit brought by the United States against one of those officers. It has regard to actions in which the interest of the United States is as defendant, not as plaintiff. Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Dalles Military Road Company (140 U.S. 599)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
140 U.S. 599
United States v. Dalles Military Road Company
SAME
v. OREGON CENT MILITARY ROAD CO. et al.
No. 1,219.
SAME
v. WILLAMETTE VALLEY & C. M. WAGON ROAD CO. et al.
No. 1,248.
SAME
v.
KELLY.
No. 1,444.
SAME
v.
COOPER.
No. 1,445.
SAME
v.
ROGERS.
No. 1,446.
SAME
v.
GRANT.
No. 1,447.
SAME
v.
FLOYD.
No. 1,448.
May 25, 1891.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Parker, for the United States.
Jas. K. Kelly and Rufus Mallory, for Dalles Military Road Co.
C. A. Dolph and C. B. Bellinger, for Oregon Cent. Military Road Co.
C. S. Wood and John E. Parsons, for Willamette Valley & C. M. Wagon road co.
Jas. K. Kelly, for appellee in 1,444-1,448.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 600-606 intentionally omitted]
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Dalles Military Road Company

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Dalles Military Road Company."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Dalles Military Road Company (140 U.S. 599)
* United States v. Dalles Military Road Company (148 U.S. 49)
# United States v. Dalles Military Road Company (148 U.S. 49)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
148 U.S. 49
United States v. Dalles Military Road Company

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Dalles Military Road Company (148 U.S. 49)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
148 U.S. 49
United States v. Dalles Military Road Company
In equity. Bill by the United States against the Dalles Military Road Company and others to forfeit a land grant. The United States appeals from a decree of the circuit court of appeals (2 C. C. A. 419, 51 Fed. Rep. 629) affirming a decree of the circuit court dismissing the bill.
For other opinions rendered in the course of this litigation, see 40 Fed. Rep. 114; 41 Fed. Rep. 493; 140 U.S. 599, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 988.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Parker. for the United States.
John F. Dillon, A. T. Britton, and A. B. Browne, for California & Oregon Land Co. Jas. K. Kelly, for Dalles Military Road Co.
BREWER, Circuit Justice.
The questions in this case are substantially the same as those in No. 1,073,-U.S. v. California & Oregon Land Co., 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 458. It is unnecessary, therefore, to state the facts in detail, and it is sufficient to say that the same decree of affirmance will be entered.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Dalcour

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
203 U.S. 408
United States v. Dalcour
Argued: October 30 and 31, 1906. --- Decided: December 3, 1906
Solicitor General Hoyt and Mr. Robert A. Howard for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 409-411 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. William A. Blount, Henry R. Hatfield, William W. Dewhurst, and A. C. Blount, Jr., for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 412-420 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Henry R. Hatfield for heirs of John Forbes, appellees.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wallenstein/The Piccolomini/A4S6

SCENE VI.
# Wallenstein/The Piccolomini/A5S1

ACT V.
# Wallenstein/The Piccolomini/A3S3

SCENE III.
Octavio and Max. Piccolomini.
OCTAVIO.
For all, I'm certain, went thro' that Sesina.
MAX.
has been in a violent and visible struggle of feelings, at length starts as one resolved) I will procure me light a shorter way. Farewell.
OCTAVIO.
MAX.
OCTAVIO (alarmed)
MAX.(returning)
A part in this thy play, ——— Thou hast miscalculated on me grievously. My way must be straight on. True with the tongue, False with the heart—I may not, cannot be: Nor can I suffer that a man should trust me— As his friend trust me—and then lull my conscience With such low pleas as these:—"I ask'd him not— He did it all at his own hazard—and My mouth has never lied to him."—No, no! What a friend takes me for, that I must be. —I'll to the Duke; ere yet this day is ended Will I demand of him that he do save His good name from the world, and with one stride Break through and rend this fine-spun web of your's. He can, he will!—I still am his believer, Yet I'll not pledge myself, but that those letters May furnish you, perchance, with proofs against him. How far may not this Tertsky have proceeded— What may not he himself too have permitted Himself to do, to snare the enemy, The laws of war excusing? Nothing, save His own mouth shall convict him—nothing less! And face to face will I go question him.
OCTAVIO.
MAX.
OCTAVIO.
I calculated on a prudent son, Who would have blessed the hand beneficent That pluck'd him back from the abyss—and lo! A fascinated being I discover, Whom his two eyes befool, whom passion wilders, Whom not the broadest light of noon can heal. Go, question him!—Be mad enough, I pray thee. The purpose of thy father, of thy Emperor, Go, give it up free booty!—Force me, drive me To an open breach before the time. And now, Now that a miracle of heaven had guarded My secret purpose even to this hour, And laid to sleep Suspicion's piercing eyes, Let me have liv'd to see that mine own son, With frantic enterprise, annihilates My toilsome labours and state-policy.
MAX.
You will some time, with your state-policy, Compel him to the measure: it may happen, Because ye are determin'd that he is guilty, Guilty ye'll make him. All retreat cut off, You close up every outlet, hem him in Narrower and narrower, till at length ye force him— Yes, ye,—ye force him, in his desperation, To set fire to his prison.—Father! father! That never can end well—it cannot—will not!
And let it be decided as it may, I see with boding heart the near approach Of an ill-starr'd, unblest catastrophe. For this great Monarch-spirit, if he fall, Will drag a world into the ruin with him. And as a ship (that midway on the ocean Takes fire) at once, and with a thunder-burst Explodes, and with itself shoots out its crew In smoke and ruin betwixt sea and heaven; So will he, falling, draw down in his fall All us, who're fix'd and mortic'd to his fortune. Deem of it what thou wilt; but pardon me, That I must bear me on in my own way. All must remain pure betwixt him and me; And, ere the day-light dawns, it must be known Which I must lose—my father or my friend.
(During his exit the curtain drops.)
end of act iii.
# Wallenstein/The Piccolomini/A4S1

ACT IV.
SCENE I.
Wallenstein at a black Table, on which a Speculum Astrologicum is described with Chalk. Seni is taking Observations through a Window.
WALLENSTEIN.
The dawn commences, and Mars rules the hour.
We must give o'er the operation. Come, We know enough.
SENI.
Just to contemplate Venus. She's now rising: Like as a sun, so shines she in the east.
WALLENSTEIN.
And (hoots down now her strongest influences.
(Contemplating the figure on the table.)
At length the mighty three corradiate; And the two stars of blessing, Jupiter And Venus, take between them the malignant Slily-malicious Mars, and thus compel Into my service that old mischief-founder: For long he view'd me hostilely, and ever With beam oblique, or perpendicular, Now in the Quartile, now in the Secundan, Shot his red lightnings at my stars, disturbing Their blessed influences and sweet aspects. Now they have conquer'd the old enemy, And bring him in the heavens a prisoner to me.
SENI. (who has come down from the window)
That makes each influence of double strength.
WALLENSTEIN.
The soft light with the veh'ment—so I love it.
Sol is the heart, Luna the head of heaven. Bold be the plan, fiery the execution.
SENI.
Maleficus affronted. Lo! Saturnus, Innocuous, powerless, in cadente Domo.
WALLENSTEIN.
Lord of the secret birth of things is he; Within the lap of earth, and in the depths Of the imagination dominates; And his are all things that eschew the light. The time is o'er of brooding and contrivance; For Jupiter, the lustrous, lordeth now, And the dark work, complete of preparation, He draws by force into the realm of light. Now must we hasten on to action, ere The scheme, and most auspicious positure Parts o'er my head, and takes once more its flight; For the heavens journey still, and sojourn not.
(There are knocks at the door)
TERTSKY. (from without)
WALLENSTEIN.
What is there of such urgence? We are busy.
TERTSKY. (from without)
It suffers no delaying.
WALLENSTEIN.
(While Seni opens the door for Tertsky, Wallenstein draws the curtain over the figures.
TERTSKY. (enters)
Galas has giv'n him up to the Emperor.
[Seni draws off the black table, and exit.
# Wallenstein/The Piccolomini/A4S2

SCENE II.
WALLENSTEIN.COUNT TERTSKY.
WALLENSTEIN. (to Tertsky)
TERTSKY.
Negociation with the Swede and Saxon, Thro' whose hands all and every thing has pass'd—
WALLENSTEIN. (drawing back)
TERTSKY.
He was plung'd down upon by Galas' agent, Who had been long in ambush, lurking for him. There must have been found on him my whole packet To Thur, to Kinsky, to Oxenstirn, to Arnheim: All this is in their hands; they have now an insight Into the whole—our measures, and our motives.
# Wallenstein/The Piccolomini/A4S4

SCENE IV.
# Wallenstein/The Piccolomini/A4S7

SCENE VII.
END OF ACT IV.
* ↑ Could I have hazarded such a Germanism, as the use of the word after-world, for posterity.—"Es spreche Welt und Nachwelt meinen Nahmen"—might have been rendered with more literal fidelity:—Let world and after-world speak out my name, &c.
* ↑ I have not ventured to affront the fastidious delicacy of our age with a literal translation of this line."werth "Die Eingeweide schaudernd aufzuregen."
# Wallenstein/The Piccolomini/A5S2

SCENE II.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/8th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 54

Chap. LIV.—An Act supplementary to an act, intituled “An Act concerning the City of Washington.””
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the several ​Act of March 3, 1803, ch. 29. Commencement of the compensations and allowances established by an act of Congress, concerning the city of Washington.compensations and allowances established by the act, intituled “An act concerning the city of Washington,” shall be computed from the first day of June, one thousand eight hundred and two, being from the time when the services, so compensated and allowed, commenced under the authority of the President of the United States.
Allowance to the surveyor.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the surveyor of the said city shall receive as a compensation for his services an allowance of three dollars per day.
Superintendent authorized to pay the compensations and to defray other expenses:Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That the superintendent of the city of Washington be, and he hereby is authorized to pay the said compensations and allowances, from the said first day of June, one thousand eight hundred and two, in conformity with the provision of the said recited act, until Congress shall otherwise direct; and also to pay and discharge all expenses of an incidental nature, which have been or may be incurred in the discharge of the functions of his office and the office of surveyor, which shall be approved by the President of the United States.
And to settle with P. C. L’Enfant.Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That the said superintendent be, and he hereby is authorized and directed to settle and pay the claim of Peter Charles L’Enfant, for his services whilst employed by the late board of commissioners, in the manner, and on the terms heretofore proposed by the said commissioners.
Out of what fund these compensations, &c. are to be paid.Sec. 5. And be it further enacted, That the several expenses authorized by this act, shall be paid and discharged out of any funds of the city of Washington, in possession of the superintendent, which are not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, March 27, 1804.