OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Royal Naval Biography/Spencer-Churchill, Henry John

Layout 2
RIGHT HONORABLE LORD HENRY JOHN SPENCER CHURCHILL. [Post-Captain of 1826.]
Youngest son of the present Duke of Marlborough, by Lady Susan, daughter of John, seventh Earl of Galloway.
This officer was born Sept. 22d, 1797; and we first find him serving as midshipman, on board the Glasgow frigate. Captain the Hon. Henry Duncan, C.B., in 1815. He was made a lieutenant into the Amphion 38, bearing the broad pendant ​of Commodore William Bowles, on the South American station, July 14th, 1818; appointed to the Martin sloop, Captain Christopher C. Askew, May 22d, 1821; promoted to the command of the Hind 20, on the Mediterranean station, April 25th, 1823; advanced to the rank of captain, Aug. 4th, 1826; and appointed to the Tweed 28, fitting out for the Cape of Good Hope station. May 18th, 1827.
In October following, Lord Henry touched at St Iago; and many days had not elapsed after his departure from that island before five of his midshipmen, their schoolmaster, and a servant, fell victims to brain fever, supposed to have been produced by sleeping on shore; among these unfortunate young gentlemen was a son of Captain George Aldham R.N. The Tweed returned home Jan. 21st, 1831, and was paid off, at Portsmouth, on the 9th of the ensuing month. His lordship married a daughter of John Bennet, Esq., M.P. for Wiltshire.
Agents.– Messrs. Barnett and King.
Addenda to the Captains
RIGHT HON. LORD HENRY JOHN SPENCER CHURCHILL. (Vol. III. Part I. p. 285.)
This officer entered the royal navy in April 1811, as midshipman on board the Revenge 74, Captain John Nash, under whom and his successor, Captain Charles P. B. Bateman, he served on the Cadiz station till July 9th, 1812. He then joined the Alfred 74, Captain Joshua Sydney Horton; and ​soon afterwards the Superb, third rate, in which latter ship, successively commanded by Captains the Hon. (now Sir Charles) Paget, Alexander Gordon, James Garland, and Humphrey F. Senhouse, on the Channel and North American stations, he continued until May 22d, 1815. We subsequently find him serving under the Hon. (now Sir Henry) Duncan and Captain Robert Preston, in the Glasgow and Euphrates, frigates, on the Channel and Mediterranean stations. He passed his examination for lieutenant on the 4th June, 1817; at which period he had been exactly six years and two months in constant active employment. On the 3d Nov. following, he was appointed mate of the Andromache 44, Captain W. H. Shirreff, fitting out for the South American station, where he was removed into the Amphion 38, bearing the broad pendant of Commodore Bowles, April 1st, 1818. His first commission, appointing him lieutenant of the latter ship, bears date July 14th, 1818. Although advanced to the rank of commander on the 25th April, 1823, he continued in the Martin, under Captain Henry Eden, until Sept. 19th following, from which period he commanded the Hind until Aug. 20th, 1825.
Lord Henry is still a bachelor. It was his brother who married the lady mentioned in p. 286 of Vol. III. Part I.
# Russian Folk-Tales/The Wood Sprite

THE WOOD SPRITE
One day the daughter of a pope, without asking leave of her mother or her father, went for a walk into the wood, and utterly lost her way. Three years went by. Now, in this wood, in which her mother and father lived, there was a bold hunter. On every holy day he used to go hunting with his gun and his dog in the dreamy forest.
One day he went into the wood, and the hairs of his dog bristled up. Then the hunter looked, and in front of him there was a stump on the wood path, and a Peasant stood on the stump and was cleaning his bast shoe. He went on with his shoe and was threatening the moon: "Light, give me light, clear moon." It was all very strange to the hunter. "Why does this Peasant," he thought, "live by himself? He looks so young, but his hair is quite grey."
He only thought this, but the Peasant guessed his thought and said, "Why am I grey? Because I am the Devil's grandfather."
Then the hunter understood that it was no mere peasant he saw, but the Wood Sprite, and he aimed at him with his gun, Bang! and he hit him in the belly. The Wood Sprite groaned, almost fell down from the stump, and that very instant jumped up again and crept into the thicket. After him ran the dog, and after the dog ran the hunter. So he went on and on and on, and he came up to the mountains, and on one of the mountains there was a fissure, and in the fissure stood a little hut.
​He entered the hut and looked, and there was the Wood Sprite rolling on a bench, absolutely out of breath, and beside him a maiden who was weeping bitterly.
"Who will now give me food and drink?"
"Hail, fair maiden!" said the hunter; "tell me what you are and whence."
"O doughty youth, I do not know myself: I have never seen the free world, and I have never known my father and mother."
"Well, come quickly, I will take you back to Holy Russia." So he took her with him and led her out of the wood, and he went through the villages, inquiring of all of the places. Now, this maiden had been taken away by the Wood Sprite, and had lived with him for three whole years, and she had been enclosed and cut off, and was almost entirely naked, but she had no shame. Then they came to the village, and the huntsman began to ask whether anyone had lost a maiden.
Then the pope said, "This is my daughter." And the pope's wife came: "Oh, my dear daughter, where have you been so long? I never thought I should see you any more."
Then the daughter looked at them, but was simply staggered and understood nothing, and only afterwards, little by little, came to herself. The pope and his wife gave her in marriage to the huntsman and rewarded him with all good things.
Then they went to look for the izbá in which she had lived with the Wood Sprite. They wandered far into the woods, but could not find it.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Russian Hymn

* related portals: Sheet music.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Russian Hymn, or simply Russia, is a standard hymn tune that was originally composed for the national anthem of Imperial Russia, "God Save the Tsar!".
"God Save the Tsar!"
Other hymns
* "God Save America" in The Army and Navy Hymnal, 1920
* "God Ever Glorious" in The Army and Navy Hymnal, 1920
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Russian Folk-Tales/Vazúza and Vólga

VAZÚZA AND VÓLGA
The Vólga and the Vazúza had a long argument whether who was the wiser and the stronger and the more honourable of the two. They contended and quarrelled, and could not decide it. So they resolved at last: "Let us both go to sleep at the same time, and the one which wakes up earlier and first reaches the Khvalýnsk Sea is wiser and stronger and the more honourable."
So the Vólga went to sleep, and so did the Vazúza.
But at night the Vazúza got up quietly and ran away from the Vólga; she took the next nearest way and flowed off.
When the Vólga woke up she went neither hurriedly nor lagging, but in an ordinary fashion. At Zubtsov she overtook the Vazúza, and looked so threatening that the Vazúza was frightened, and owned she was the younger daughter, and begged the Vólga to take her in her arms into the Sea of Khvalýnsk.
And, to this day, the Vazúza wakes up in the spring before the Vólga, and wakes the Vólga up out of her winter sleep.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rhode Island v. Massachusetts (36 U.S. 226)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
36 U.S. 226
Rhode Island v. Massachusetts

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rhode Island v. Massachusetts (38 U.S. 23)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
38 U.S. 23
Rhode Island v. Massachusetts
MR. SOUTHARD, for the complainants, stated that the state of Rhode Island, with the consent of the Court, obtained at last term, had amended the bill filed in this case; and he moved the Court for a rule on the state of Massachusetts to answer within a short time, so that the case might be disposed of during the term.
Mr. Webster stated, that, although not authorized to appear in the case, he thought it proper to say that the opinions of the Court delivered at the last term in this cause had been submitted to the government of Massachusetts. It was a short time before the adjournment of the legislature of the state that they were communicated to them. The subject will be again presented by the governor to the legislature, at the session now held; and it is expected that some action upon it will take place. In the posture in which the case stood at the last term of this Court, the attorney general of the state of Massachusetts has not thought it proper to do any thing. The movements of such bodies, as the defendants in this case, are slow.
Mr. Hazard had no objection to an allowance of time to the defendants to answer. He had a strong impression that he had seen some proceedings of the legislature of Massachusetts, at its last session in 1838, by which the direction of this case was left to the counsel employed by the state. He did not think that the slow movements of such bodies should be allowed, when other parties are concerned. He desired that a time for the filing of an answer, by the state of Massachusetts, should be definitely fixed.
Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the Court.--

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rhode Island v. Massachusetts

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Rhode Island v. Massachusetts."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Rhode Island v. Massachusetts (36 U.S. 226)
* Rhode Island v. Massachusetts (37 U.S. 657)
* Rhode Island v. Massachusetts (38 U.S. 23)
* Rhode Island v. Massachusetts (40 U.S. 233)
* Rhode Island v. Massachusetts (45 U.S. 591)
# Ruth Fielding at Silver Ranch

Book 5 in the Ruth Fielding series
Ruth Fielding
at Silver Ranch
OR
Schoolgirls Among The Cowboys
BY
ALICE B. EMERSON
Author of "Ruth Fielding of The Red Mill," "Ruth Fielding at Briarwood Hall," etc.
ILLUSTRATED
NEW YORK CUPPLES & LEON COMPANY PUBLISHERS
FRECKLES LEAPED UP, FRIGHTENED AND SNORTING.
Books for Girls
By ALICE B. EMERSON
RUTH FIELDING SERIES
12mo Cloth. Illustrated.
Or, Jasper Parloe's Secret.
RUTH FIELDING AT BRIARWOOD HALL Or, Solving the Campus Mystery.
RUTH FIELDING AT SNOW CAMP Or, Lost in the Backwoods.
RUTH FIELDING AT LIGHTHOUSE POINT Or, Nita, the Girl Castaway.
RUTH FIELDING AT SILVER RANCH Or, Schoolgirls Among the Cowboys.
Cupples & Leon Co., Publishers, New York.
Copyright, 1913, by Cupples & Leon Company
Ruth Fielding at Silver Ranch
Printed in U.S.A.
CONTENTS
| CHAPTER | CHAPTER | PAGE |
| I. | "Old Trouble-Maker" | 1 |
| II. | Bashful Ike | 11 |
| III. | In Which Things Happen | 18 |
| IV. | The Fire Fight | 30 |
| V. | "Old Trouble-Maker" Turned Loose | 40 |
| VI. | The Roping Contest | 51 |
| VII. | Jane Ann Turns the Trick | 57 |
| VIII. | What Was on the Records | 66 |
| IX. | The Fox Is Reckless | 75 |
| X. | Ruth Shows Her Mettle | 83 |
| XI. | An Ursine Hold-Up | 89 |
| XII. | The Man From Tintacker | 97 |
| XIII. | The Party at the Schoolhouse | 103 |
| XIV. | Bashful Ike Comes Out Strong | 112 |
| XV. | "The Night Trick" | 123 |
| XVI. | The Joke That Failed | 136 |
| XVII. | The Stampede | 143 |
| XVIII. | A Desperate Case | 150 |
| XIX. | The Man at Tintacker | 157 |
| XX. | The Wolf at the Door | 164 ​ |
| XXI. | A Plucky Fight | 171 |
| XXII. | Service Courageous | 178 |
| XXIII. | Bashful Ike Takes the Bit in his Teeth | 185 |
| XXIV. | Coals of Fire | 192 |
| XXV. | At the Old Red Mill Again | 199 |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Saperito v. Iowa

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
390 U.S. 998
Saperito v. Iowa
Richard C. Turner, Atty. Gen. of Iowa and David A. Elderkin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Iowa.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sapir v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
348 U.S. 373
Sapir v. United States
Argued: March 7, 1955. ---
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sapir v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Douglas
United States Supreme Court
348 U.S. 373
Sapir v. United States
Argued: March 7, 1955. ---
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted.
We believe that the judgment of the Court of Appeals of October 20, 1954, 216 F.2d 722, reversing and remanding this cause with instructions to dismiss the indictment was correct. It is not necessary for us to pass on the question presented under its subsequent judgment of November 17, 1954, directing a new trial. We vacate the latter judgment, which directed the new trial, and we reinstate the former one which instructed the trial court to dismiss the indictment.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Santovincenzo v. Egan

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
284 U.S. 30
Santovincenzo v. Egan
Argued: Oct. 22, 1931. --- Decided: Nov 23, 1931
[Syllabus from pages 30-32 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Carroll G. Walter, of New York City, for appellant.
Mr. Robert P. Beyer, of New York City, for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from page 33 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sapir v. United States/Concurrence Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Douglas
United States Supreme Court
348 U.S. 373
Sapir v. United States
Argued: March 7, 1955. ---
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring.
Petitioner was convicted by the jury of a conspiracy to defraud the United States. Petitioner moved for a judgment of acquittal. The District Court denied the motion. On appeal, the Court of Appeals held that that motion should have been granted, as the evidence was insufficient to convict. 216 F.2d 722. It accordingly reversed and remanded the cause with instructions to dismiss the indictment. Later, the Government moved to amend the judgment so as to grant a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The Court of Appeals granted the motion of the Government.
The granting of a new trial after a judgment of acquittal for lack of evidence violates the command of the Fifth Amendment that no person shall 'be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.'
The correct rule was stated in Kepner v. United States, 195 U.S. 100, at page 130, 24 S.Ct. 797, at page 805, 49 L.Ed. 114, 'It is, then, the settled law of this court that former jeopardy includes one who has been acquitted by a verdict duly rendered * * *.' If the jury had acquitted, there plainly would be double jeopardy to give the Government another go at this citizen. If, as in the Kepner case, the trial judge had rendered a verdict of acquittal, the guarantee against double jeopardy would prevent a new trial of the old offense. I see no difference when the appellate court orders a judgment of acquittal for lack of evidence.
If petitioner had asked for a new trial, different considerations would come into play, for then the defendant opens the whole record for such disposition as might be just. See Bryan v. United States, 338 U.S. 552, 70 S.Ct. 317, 94 L.Ed. 335. And see Trono v. United States, 199 U.S. 521, 26 S.Ct. 121, 50 L.Ed. 292; Stroud v. United States, 251 U.S. 15, 18, 40 S.Ct. 50, 51, 64 L.Ed. 103; State of Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber, 329 U.S. 459, 462, 67 S.Ct. 374, 375, 91 L.Ed. 422. Moreover, a reversal by the appellate court on grounds of error that infected the trial would also be different, as Palko v. State of Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319, 58 S.Ct. 149, 82 L.Ed. 288, shows. But and acquittal on the basis of lack of evidence concludes the controversy, as the Kepner case holds, and puts it at rest under the protection of the Double Jeopardy Clause, absent a motion by the defendant for a new trial.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sappho

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Sappho."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.

### Poetry

* "Sappho" (1890), a poem by Florence Earle Coates ("As a wan weaver in an attic dim,")
* "Sappho" (1822), a poem by Letitia Elizabeth Landon from Poetic Sketches ("She leant upon her harp, and thousands looked")
* "Sappho" (1825), a poem by Letitia Elizabeth Landon from Ideal Likenesses ("Dark, passionate, though beautiful, the eye").
* "Sappho" (1846), a poem by Christina Rossetti. ("I sigh at day-dawn, and I sigh")
* "Sappho" (1911), a poem by Sara Teasdale published in Helen of Troy and Other Poems. ("The twilight's inner flame grows blue and deep,")
* "Sappho" (1915), a poem by Sara Teasdale published in Rivers to the Sea. ("Midnight, and in the darkness not a sound,")

### Drama

* Sappho (1818), a play by Franz Grillparzer
* Sappho, a Dramatic Sketch (1824) by Catherine Grace Garnett Godwin.
* Sappho, A Tragedy in Five Acts, by Estelle Lewis.

### Encyclopedic articles

* “Sappho”, by Philip Smith in Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, 1870.
* "Sappho," in The Nuttall Encyclopædia, (ed.) by James Wood, London: Frederick Warne and Co., Ltd. (1907)
* "Sappho," by John Arthur Platt in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Sappho," in The New Student's Reference Work, Chicago: F.E. Compton and Co. (1914)
* "Sappho," in The Encyclopedia Americana, New York: The Encyclopedia Americana Corporation (1920)

### See also

* Author:Sappho
* To Sappho
# Saperito v. Iowa/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
390 U.S. 998
Saperito v. Iowa
Denied.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sappho (Coates)

As a wan weaver in an attic dim
* "Sappho" from the The Atlantic Monthly (Feb 1890).
* "Sappho" from Poems (1898)
* "Sappho" from Poems Vol. II (1916)

## References

* ↑ See this version on Google Books (scroll down page to view)
# Ricaud v. American Metal Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
246 U.S. 304
Ricaud v. American Metal Company
Argued: Jan. 3, 1918. --- Decided: March 11, 1918
Messrs. Frank E. Hunter, of El Paso, Tex., and Ernest Wilkinson, of Washington, D. C., for Ricaud and others.
Mr. U.S. Goen, of El Paso, Tex., for American Metal Co., Limited.
Mr. Justice CLARKE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rice Adams Corporation v. Lathrop

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
278 U.S. 509
Rice Adams Corporation v. Lathrop
Argued: and Submitted Jan. 11, 1929. --- Decided: Feb 18, 1929
Messrs. Charles J. Staples,, Frederick G. Mitchell, William Doran Cushman, and Wm. P. Conley, all of Buffalo, N. Y., for petitioner.
Messrs. Joshua R. H. Potts, and Eugene Vincent Clarke, both of Chicago, Ill., for respondent.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rice v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
331 U.S. 247
Rice v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago
Argued: Feb. 14, 1947. --- Decided: May 5, 1947
Lee A. Freeman, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner Rice.
William C. Wines, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner Illinois Commerce Com'n.
Howard Ellis, of Chicago, Ill., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rice

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Rice."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, taxonomy, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Rice ap Thomas
* Rice, Edmund Ignatius
* Rice, George
* Rice, James
* Rice, John ap
* Rice, Richard
* Rice, Stephen
* Rice, Thomas Spring
# Sacred Books of the East/Volume 3/The Shih/Lessons from the States/Book 2

Book II. The Odes of Shâo and the South.
The Shû and previous portions of the Shih have made us familiar with Shâo, the name of the appanage of Shih, one of the principal ministers at the court of Kâu in the first two reigns of the dynasty. The site of the city of Shâo was in the present department of Făng-khiang, Shen-hsî. The first possessor of it, along with the still more famous duke of Kâu, remained at court, to watch over the fortunes of the new dynasty. They were known as 'the highest dukes' and 'the two great chiefs,' the duke of Kâu having charge of the eastern portions of the kingdom, and the other of the western. The pieces in this Book are supposed to have been produced in Shâo, and the principalities south of it within his jurisdiction, by the duke.