OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# What They Say in New England/Tea-Grounds

Tea-Grounds . .
When you find tea-grounds floating in your cup, know that you are going to have company. If the grounds are soft, it is a woman who is coming; if hard, a man, If the grounds are long, the person coming is tall; if short, the visitor will be short. When a girl or woman first sights the floating grounds in her cup, the comment is apt to be, “There, got a beau!” If the grounds are taken out and thrown under the table, the company will stay all night. If the grounds are left in the cup, the visitor will simply make a call.
After you drink the tea you can get still further enlightenment, if there are grounds in the bottom of the cup. Turn the cup around a few times. Then put it bottom upwards on your saucer, and give it a few more turns, Now turn it over. If you see paths in the grounds, it is a sign that you are ​to go on a journey. If the paths are long, the journey will be long, and vice versâ. Turn the cup up sideways, and if any tea runs out you will cry on your journey. If the grounds anywhere form a ring with a dot in the middle, that is a wish, and you must think what you most want. You may see hills, and people walking or working or on horseback. All the things you see have a meaning. But I believe you are at liberty to interpret them pretty much as you choose. It is to be noted that many people can see naught but the tea-grounds, where others see all sorts of objects in them.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/21st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 11

Chap. XI.—An Act to extend the time for entering certain donation claims to land in the territory of Arkansas.
Certain provisions continued in force for two years from May 24, 1831. Act of May 24, 1828, ch. 108. Act of Jan. 6, 1829, ch. 2. Act of Jan. 13, 1830, ch. 3.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the provisions of the eighth and ninth sections of the act of Congress, approved twenty-fourth day of May, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-eight, entitled “An act to aid the state of Ohio in extending the Miami Canal from Dayton to Lake Erie, and to grant a quantity of land to said state to aid in the construction of the canals authorized by law, and for making donations of land to certain persons in Arkansas territory;” and the provisions of the act entitled “An act restricting the location of certain land claims in the territory of Arkansas, and for other purposes,” approved sixth January, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-nine; and, also, the provisions of the act, entitled “An act to extend the time for locating certain donations in Arkansas,” approved thirteenth January, one thousand eight hundred and thirty, be, and the same are hereby, continued in force for the period of two years, from the twenty-fourth May, one thousand eight hundred and thirty-one:Proviso. Provided, That nothing in this act, ​or the foregoing acts, shall be so construed as to prevent the President of the United States from bringing the said lands in Arkansas into market under existing laws; and all claims to donations under the before-recited act, which shall not have been presented and allowed by the proper authorities on or before the day which shall be fixed on by the President for the sale of said land, are hereby declared forfeited to the United States.
Approved, January 27, 1831.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/21st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 12

Chap. XII.—An Act further supplemental to the act entitled “An act making further provision for settling the claims to land, in the territory of Missouri,” passed the thirteenth day of June, one thousand eight hundred and twelve.
Act of June 13, 1812, ch. 99. The United States to relinquish certain rights.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the United States do hereby relinquish to the inhabitants of the several towns or villages of Portage des Sioux, Saint Charles, Saint Louis, Saint Ferdinand, Villa Robert, Carondelet, Saint Genevieve, New Madrid, New Bourbon, and Little Prairie, in the state of Missouri, all the right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the town or village lots, out lots, common field lots, and commons in, adjoining and belonging to, the said towns or villages, confirmed to them respectively, by the first section of the act of Congress, entitled “An act making further provision for settling the claims to land in the territory of Missouri,” passed the thirteenth day of June, one thousand eight hundred and twelve, to be held by the inhabitants of the said towns and villages, in full property, according to their several rights therein, to be regulated or disposed of for the use of the inhabitants, according to the laws of the state of Missouri.
United States to relinquish all right, &c. in Missouri.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the United States do hereby relinquish all their right, title, and interest, in and to the town and village lots, out lots, and common field lots, in the state of Missouri, reserved for the support of schools, in the respective towns and villages aforesaid, by the second section of the above-recited act of Congress; and that the same shall be sold or disposed of, or regulated for the said purposes, in such manner, as may be directed by the legislature of said state.
Approved, January 27, 1831.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/21st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 10

Chap. X.—An Act to alter the times of holding the district courts of the United States for the districts of Maine and Illinois, and northern district of Alabama.
District court of Alabama.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the terms of the district court of the United States for the northern district of Alabama, which are now directed by law to be held on the first Mondays of March and October in each year, shall hereafter be held on the second Mondays of April and October in each year;District court of Maine. and that the term of the district court of the United States for the district of Maine, which is now directed by law to be held on the second Tuesday of September in each year, shall hereafter be held on the first Tuesday of September in each year: and all processes which may have issued, or which shall hereafter issue, returnable to the next succeeding terms of the said district courts as heretofore established, shall be held returnable, and be returned, to those terms to which they are severally changed by this act.
District court of Illinois.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the terms of the district court of the United States for the district of Illinois, which are now directed by law to be held on the third Mondays of June and November in each year, shall hereafter be held on the first Mondays of May and December in each year; and all process which may have issued, or which shall hereafter issue, returnable to the next succeeding terms of the said district court as heretofore established, shall be held returnable, and be returned, to those terms to which they are severally changed by this act.
Approved, January 27, 1831.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/21st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 114

Chap. CXIV.—An Act for the relief of John Culbertson, and to provide an interpreter for the district court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana.
Payment to John Culbertson.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the sum of three hundred and thirty-three dollars and thirty-three and one-third cents be paid by the marshal of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana to John Culbertson, for his services rendered as interpreter to the United States’ court for said district, under the provisional appointment of the judge, for each regular term of said court, from the December term of one thousand eight hundred and twenty-five, inclusively, up to the time of the passage of this act.
Interpreter created.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the judge of the district court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana be, and is hereby, authorized to appoint an interpreter to said court, and to allow him a compensation not exceeding three hundred and thirty-three dollars and thirty-three and one third cents, for his services at each regular term of said court, to be holden subsquently to the passage of this act; and the marshal is authorized to pay the same upon the order of the judge: Provided, always,Proviso. That it shall be the duty of the said interpreter, during the continuance in office, to attend all and every of the called or irregular sessions of the said court, without any additional compensation therefor;Proviso. Provided, also, That the said interpreter shall not receive, under this act, more than one thousand dollars for each year.
Approved, March 3, 1831.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/21st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 14

Chap. XIV.—An Act making provision for the compensation of witnesses, and payment of other expenses attending the trial of the impeachment of James H. Peck.
Witnesses, four dollars per diem, and twenty cents per mile.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That to every witness summoned to attend the trial of the impeachment of James H. Peck, there shall be allowed and paid, for every day’s attendance upon the said trial, the sum of four dollars; and also for mileage, at the rate of twenty cents for every mile distance coming to the city of Washington, and returning to the usual place of residence of the witnesses respectively, computing the said distance by the usual route of travel by land.
Secretary of the Senate to certify.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That it shall be the duty of the secretary of the Senate to ascertain and certify the amount due to each witness for attendance and mileage; which certificate shall be a sufficient voucher to entitle the witness to receive from the treasury of the United States, the amount certified to be due, unless otherwise ordered by the Senate. ​Marshal of the District of Columbia, five dollars per diem.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That to the marshal of the District of Columbia there shall be allowed and paid, for every day’s attendance upon the court of impeachment, during the said trial, the sum of five dollars, the amount to be ascertained and certified by the secretary of the Senate; which certificate shall be a sufficient voucher to entitle the said marshal to receive from the treasury of the United States, the amount certified to be due, unless otherwise ordered by the Senate.
Marshal of Missouri, fifty dollars. Marshal of Arkansas, five dollars.Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That there shall be paid to the marshal of the state of Missouri, the sum of fifty dollars; and to the marshal of the territory of Arkansas, the sum of five dollars, for serving and returning subpœnas for witnesses, issued by order of the said court.
13,500 dollars appropriated.Sec. 5. And be it further enacted, That the sum of thirteen thousand five hundred dollars be, and the same is hereby, appropriated to defray the expenses incurred under the provisions of this act, to be paid out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, February 3, 1831.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/21st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 1

Chapter I.—An Act to change the time of holding the rule term of the circuit court of the district of West Tennessee.
District judge of Tennessee to hold term of circuit court at Nashville, first Monday in March. Powers.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That it shall be the duty of the district judge of Tennessee, to hold a term of the circuit court at Nashville, for the district of West Tennessee, on the first Monday in March, in each year, who shall have power to make all necessary rules and orders touching any suit, action, appeal, writ of error, process, pleadings, or proceedings, that may be pending in said circuit court, or that may have issued returnable to the circuit court to be holden on the first Monday in September next, preparatory to the hearing, trial, or decision of such action, suit, appeal, writ of error, process, pleadings or proceedings; and all writs and process may hereafter be returnable to the said courts to be holden on the first Monday in March, in the same manner as to the sessions of the circuit courts directed by law to be held at Nashville on the first Monday in September of each year: and the writs and other process returnable to the said circuit court on the first Monday in September, may bear teste on the first Monday in March.
Proviso: No final judgment except by consent.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the said district judge shall have power to adjourn from day to day, or to any other period of time, more than three months before the September term of said court: Provided, That no final judgment be rendered at said term to be held by the district judge, except by the consent of both parties.
Approved, January 13, 1831.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/21st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 104

Chap. CIV.—An Act for the benefit of Percis Lovely, and for other purposes.
Certain lands secured to her.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the tract of land not exceeding one half section, including the present residence of Mrs. Percis Lovely, in Pope county, in the territory of Arkansas, shall be reserved by the President of the United States from public sale, during the lifetime of said Percis, and that she shall have the entire use and privilege of, and possession of the said half section of land, for and during her life:Proviso. Provided, That the said Percis Lovely shall not commit, or permit any other person to commit, on said land, any voluntary waste.
Value of certain improvements, &c.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the Secretary of the Treasury pay unto the said Percis Lovely, or her legal representative, out of any money in the treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, a sum equal to that for which her improvements upon the land secured to her by the treaty of Hiawassee, in one thousand eight hundred and seventeen, for life, were valued, and which improvements and land were taken from her by the treaty of Washington, of one thousand eight hundred and twenty-eight, with the Cherokee Indians.Proviso. Provided, That before the money shall be paid the said Percis Lovely, she shall produce to the Treasury Department satisfactory evidence that the said sum of money has not been heretofore paid her by the government of the United States, through the Indian Department:Proviso. and Provided, also, That the half section granted by this act, shall not interfere with, or include any lands lying within the limits of any reservation made by the last-named treaty, made at Washington as aforesaid, in the year eighteen hundred and twenty-eight.
Seneca treaty.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That, for carrying into effect the treaty concluded with the Seneca tribe of Indians at Washington, the ​twenty-eighth day of February, one thousand eight hundred and thirty-one, the sum of eleven thousand one hundred and seventy-five dollars be, and the same is hereby, appropriated, to be paid out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, March 3, 1831.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/21st Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 115

Chap. CXV.—An Act concerning vessels employed in the whale fishery.
Act of March 3, 1825, ch. 99. Vessels employed in the whale fishery.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That all the provisions of the act, entitled “An act to authorize the register or enrollment, and license, to be issued in the name of the president or secretary of any incorporated company owning a steamboat or vessel,” passed the third day of March, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-five, shall extend and be applicable to every ship or vessel owned by any incorporated company, and employed wholly in the whale fishery, so long as such ship or vessel shall be wholly employed in the whale fishery.
Approved, March 3, 1831.
# United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
311 U.S. 377
United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Company
Argued: Oct. 14, 15, 1940. --- Decided: Dec 16, 1940
See 312 U.S. 712, 61 S.Ct. 548, 85 L.Ed. --.
[Syllabus from pages 377-379 intentionally omitted]
Robert H. Jackson, Atty. Gen., and Francis B. Biddle, Sol. Gen., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 379-386 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Raymond T. Jackson, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Hugo Kohlmann, of New York City, for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from Pages 386-393 intentionally omitted]
Abram P. Staples, Atty. Gen., of Virginia, for Commonwealth of Virginia as amicus curiae, by special leave of Court.
[Argument of Counsel from Pages 394-397 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Antonio Maria Ossio

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
154 U.S. 535
United States v. Antonio Maria Ossio
The Attorney General, for the United States.
Mr. Justice CLIFFORD delivered the following order:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Arizona

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
295 U.S. 174
United States v. Arizona
Argued: on Motions March 4, 1935. --- Decided: April 29, 1935
[Syllabus from pages 174-176 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Harry W. Blair, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 176-178 intentionally omitted]
Mr. James R. Moore, of Phoenix, Ariz., for defendant.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Antonio Maria Ossio/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
154 U.S. 535
United States v. Antonio Maria Ossio
This is an appeal from a decree of the district court for the northern district of California, affirming a decree of the land commissioners.
On examination of the transcript, we find it is the same case as the preceding (23 How. 273), in which the opinion has been delivered, reversing the decree of the district court. By some mistake two transcripts of the record were taken out in the court below, and each has been docketed in this court.
Accordingly, the case is dismissed, but no procedendo will issue to the district court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Archibald McNeil & Sons Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
267 U.S. 302
United States v. Archibald McNeil & Sons Company
Argued: Jan. 9, 1925. --- Decided: March 2, 1925
Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, of New York City, and the Attorney General, for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from page 303 intentionally omitted]
Mr. George Demming, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Who's Who in the Far East/OUTREY, Ernest Amedee Antoine Georges

Layout 2
​ OUTREY, Ernest Amedee Antoine Georges (THUDAUMOT), Resident; Administrator, 1st class; b. April 11, 1863. Joined Civil Service of Indo-China, Oct. 10, 1884; Administrator, 4th class, Aug. 1, 1889; Administrator, 3rd class, Feb. 4, 1891; Administrator, 2nd class, Sept. 1, 1898; Administrator, 1st class, Feb. 4,1901. Decoration: Chevalier de la Legion d'Honneur; Officier d'Academic. Address: Thudaumot, Province de Thudaumot, Cochin-China.
# Who's Who in the Far East/OWEN, John Fortescue

Layout 2
​ OWEN, John Fortescue (KUALALIPIS), Acting District Officer; b. July 28, 1889. Entered Federated Malay States Civil Service as Junior Officer, Pahang, 1889; acting assistant Collector and Magistrate, Kuala Pahang, Oct., 1889; acting Collector and Magistrate at Rompin, Temerloh, Kuantan, Kuala Pahang, 1889-1893; Collector and Magistrate, Kuantan, Aug., 1893; Superintendent, Ulu Pahang, 1896; District Officer, Coast of Negri Sembilan, 1899; acting Secretary to Resident, Senior Magistrate, Warden of Mines, and Protector of Chinese, Pahang, 1901; acting District Officer, Kuala Lipis; Senior Magistrate, and Registrar of Titles, Pahang, since 1903. Address: Kuala Lipis, Pahang, Federated Malay States.
# Who's Who in the Far East/OUSTON, Geoffrey

Layout 2
​ OUSTON, Geoffrey (KUALA LUMPUR), Acting Assistant, Land Revenue Office; b. Jan. 1, 1878. Passed in Law and Malay; cadet, Federated Malay States Civil Service, 1900; acting assistant District Officer, Tanjong Malim, 1903; acting Financial Assistant, Krian, 1904; acting Inspector of Schools, Perak, 1905; present post, 1906. Address: Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, Federated Malay States.
# Who's Who in the Far East/P'AN'HSIAO-SU

Layout 2
​ P'AN'HSIAO-SU (KANSU), ex-Governor; native of Hunan. Prefect of Ti-hua, Kansu; Chen-ti Tao, do., 1896; Judicial Commissioner, do. spring, 1901; Financial Commissioner, New Dominion, Jan., 1901; Governor, do., Oct., 1902, degraded and sent to work on roads for peculation, Sept., 1905.
# Who's Who in the Far East/OZAKI, Baron Saburo

Layout 2
​OZAKI, Baron Saburo (TOKYO), Member of House of Peers; b. Jan., 1842, in Kyoto-fu. Formerly in Japanese Government Service; was one of the promoters of Seoul-Fusan Railway; rendered distinguished service in connection with Restoration; was created Baron, 1896. Address: Tokyo, Japan.
# Who's Who in the Far East/P'U-CHUN, Duke

Layout 2
​ P'U-CHUN, Duke (PEKING); s. of Prince Tuan; Imperial Clansman; appointed Heir Apparent with status as successor to Emperor T'ung-chih, Jan., 1900; disinherited, Nov., 1001, with rank of Imperial Duke.
# Who's Who in the Far East/OURA, Kanetake

Layout 2
​ OURA, Kanetake (TOKYO), Member of House of Peers; b. at Satsuma, May, 1850. Appointed Governor of Shimane -ken, 1893; subsequently Governor of several Prefectures; Inspector-General of Metropolitan Police, 1898-1900 and 1901-1903; Minister of Communications from Sept., 1901 to Jan., 1906. Address: Tokyo, Japan.
# Who's Who in the Far East/OYAMA, Tsunasuke

Layout 2
​OYAMA, Tsunasuke (TOKYO), Minister at Rome; b. Jan., 1853, at Kagoshima. Appointed Legation Councillor at Rome and Paris, 1878-1879; promoted Secretary of Legation at London, 1884; Private Secretary to Foreign Minister, 1886; Secretary of Legation at Paris, 1838; appointed Minister at the Hague, 1892; later at Vienna; finally at Rome, 1899. Address: Japanese Legation, Rome, Italy, and Tokyo, Japan.