OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Coon Rapids National Bank v. Lee

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
239 U.S. 659
Coon Rapids National Bank v. Lee

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Coon v. Kennedy/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
248 U.S. 457
Coon v. Kennedy
Argued: Dec. 11, 1918. --- Decided: Jan 13, 1919
This writ of error runs to a judgment of the Court of Errors and Appeals of New Jersey filed March 4, 1918, 103 Atl. 207, denying relief to Rebecca Coon, who sued to recover under the New Jersey Workmen's Compensation Act (P. L. 1911, p. 134), on account of her husband's death by drowning in the navigable waters of that state while employed as a fireman on a tugboat.
The court held that as the accident occurred August 4, 1915, the Act of Congress approved October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L. c. 97, § 1, p. 395 [Comp. St. 1918, § 991, subd. 3]), 'saving * * * to claimants the right and remedies under the workmen's compensation law of any state,' was inapplicable, and that under the doctrine announced in Southern Pacific Company v. Jensen, 244 U.S. 205, 37 Sup. Ct. 524, 61 L. Ed. 1086, L. R. A. 1918C, 451, Ann. Cas. 1917E, 900, the rights of the parties depended upon the maritime law of the United States.
There was no decision against the validity of a treaty or statute of or an authority exercised under the United States, nor in favor of the validity of a statute of or an authority exercised under a state challenged because of repugnance to the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United States. Consequently, under the Act of September 6, 1916 (39 Stat. L. c. 448, § 2, p. 726 [Comp. St. § 1214]), the writ of error was improperly sued out and must be
Dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cooney v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
294 U.S. 384
Cooney v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Company
Argued: Feb. 7, 8, 1935. --- Decided: March 4, 1935
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Montana.
Messrs. Enor K. Matson and Raymond T. Nagle, both of Helena, Mont., for appellants.
Messrs. M. S. Gunn, of Helena, Mont., and Elmer L. Brock, of Denver, Colo., for appellee.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Coon Rapids National Bank v. Lee/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
239 U.S. 659
Coon Rapids National Bank v. Lee
No appearance for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. A. B. Cummins and Mr. O. M. Brockett for defendant in error.
Docketed and dismissed with costs, pursuant to the Ninth Rule.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Coon v. Kennedy

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
248 U.S. 457
Coon v. Kennedy
Argued: Dec. 11, 1918. --- Decided: Jan 13, 1919
Mr. James D. Carpenter, Jr., of Jersey City, N. J., for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Isidor Kalisch, of Newark, N. J., for defendant in error.
Memorandum opinion by Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Collier's New Encyclopedia (1921)/New Ulm

* related portals: Minnesota.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, travel guide, Wikidata item.
Edition of 1921; disclaimer.
​NEW ULM, a city of Minnesota, the county-seat of Brown co., 88 miles S. W. of St. Paul, on the Minnesota river and on the Chicago and Northwestern and the Minneapolis and St. Louis railroads. It is the center of an important agricultural and stock-raising region and has important trade interests. There are manufactories of flour, cigars, marble, bricks, machine products, pipe organs, etc. The city has a handsome court house, hospitals, and public schools. It is the seat of Martin Luther College. Pop. (1910) 5,648; (1920) 6,745.
# Collier's New Encyclopedia (1921)/New Orleans, Battle of

Edition of 1921; disclaimer.
​NEW ORLEANS, BATTLE OF, an engagement fought on Jan. 8, 1815, between a force of 12,000 British under Sir Edward Pakenham, and one of 6,000 Americans under Gen. Andrew Jackson. The latter were in a strongly intrenched position and awaited Pakenham's assault on their lines. The battle lasted only 25 minutes, when the British fled, leaving behind them 2,600 killed and wounded. Pakenham was among the slain. The Americans' loss was only 8 ​killed and 13 wounded. It was the last battle of the War of 1812.
# Collier's New Encyclopedia (1921)/New Orleans University

Edition of 1921; disclaimer.
​NEW ORLEANS UNIVERSITY, a coeducational institution in New Orleans, La.; founded in 1873 under the auspices of the Methodist Episcopal Church; reported at the close of 1919: professors and instructors, 17; students, 400; volumes in the library, 10,000; grounds and buildings valued at $150,000; income, $35,000; endowment, $100,000; productive funds, $93,000; president, Charles M. Melden, D. D.
# Collier's New Encyclopedia (1921)/New Philadelphia

Edition of 1921; disclaimer.
​NEW PHILADELPHIA, a city of Ohio, the county-seat of Tuscarawas co., 96 miles S. of Cleveland, on the Tuscarawas river, the Ohio canal, and the Baltimore and Ohio and the Pennsylvania railroads. It is an important mining center and has manufactories of steel, sewer pipe, flour, brick, etc. The city contains a park, a public library, several institutions and a court house. Pop. (1910) 8,542; (1920) 10,718.
# Collier's New Encyclopedia (1921)/New Providence

Edition of 1921; disclaimer.
​NEW PROVIDENCE, chief of the Bahama Islands. Though not the largest of the Bahama group, being 20 miles long, it contains Nassau, the seat of government. It is 170 miles from Florida, is flat, with lagoons and good harbor. Pop. about 15,000.
# Collier's New Encyclopedia (1921)/New Westminster

Edition of 1921; disclaimer.
​NEW WESTMINSTER, a city and former capital of British Columbia; on the Fraser river; 15 miles from its mouth, and 60 miles N. N. E. of Victoria, on the Canadian Pacific, the Great Northern, and the Canadian Northern railways. It has the residences of Episcopal and Roman Catholic bishops, a convent, Roman Catholic and Methodist colleges, the Dominion Penitentiary, Provincial Asylum for the Insane, sawmills, and great salmon-canning establishments. There are also manufactories of wire and nails, gasoline engines, etc. Pop. about 22,000.
# Collier's New Encyclopedia (1921)/New World, The

Edition of 1921; disclaimer.
​NEW WORLD, THE, the Western Hemisphere. This name is of very early origin, for Ferdinand inscribed on the tomb of Columbus, “To Castile and to Leon Columbus gave a new world.”
# Collier's New Encyclopedia (1921)/New Year's Day

Edition of 1921; disclaimer.
​NEW YEAR'S DAY, the day on which the year commences in the Gregorian calendar; the 1st of January; usually called New Year, or New Year's. The celebration of the commencement of the new year dates from high antiquity. The Jews regarded it as the anniversary of Adam's birthday, and celebrated it with splendid entertainments; a practice which they have continued down to the present time. The Romans also made this a holiday, and dedicated it to Janus with rich and numerous sacrifices; the newly elected magistrates entered upon their duties on this day; the people made each other presents of gilt dates, figs, and plums; and even the emperors received from their subjects New Year's gifts, which at a later period it became compulsory to bestow. From the Romans the custom of making presents on New Year's Day was borrowed by the Christians, by whom it was long retained; but even in those countries where it has lingered longest, it is falling rapidly into desuetude.
# Subdivision C—Offences relating to debt bondage

271.8 Offence of debt bondage
    (1) A person commits an offence of debt bondage if:
       (a) the person engages in conduct that causes another person to enter into debt bondage; and
       (b) the person intends to cause the other person to enter into debt bondage.
Penalty: Imprisonment for 12 months.
    (2) In determining, for the purposes of any proceedings for an offence against subsection (1), whether a person (the first person) has caused another person (the second person) to enter into debt bondage, a court, or if the trial is before a jury, the jury, may have regard to any of the following matters:
       (a) the economic relationship between the first person and the second person;
       (b) the terms of any written or oral contract or agreement between the second person and another person (whether or not the first person);
       (c) the personal circumstances of the second person, including but not limited to:
       (i) whether the second person is entitled to be in Australia under the Migration Act 1958; and
       (ii) the second person’s ability to speak, write and understand English or the language in which the deception or inducement occurred; and
       (iii) the extent of the second person’s social and physical dependence on the first person.
    (3) Subsection (2) does not:
       (a) prevent the leading of any other evidence in proceedings for an offence against subsection (1); or
       (b) limit the manner in which evidence may be adduced or the admissibility of evidence.
271.9 Offence of aggravated debt bondage
    (1) A person commits an offence of aggravated debt bondage if the person commits an offence of debt bondage in relation to another person (the victim) and the victim is under 18.
Penalty: Imprisonment for 2 years.
    (2) In order to prove an offence of aggravated debt bondage, the prosecution must prove that the defendant intended to commit, or was reckless as to committing, the offence against a person under that age.
    (3) If, on a trial for an offence against this section, the court, or if the trial is before a jury, the jury, is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence, but is satisfied that he or she is guilty of an offence against section 271.8, it may find the defendant not guilty of the aggravated offence but guilty of an offence against that section.
# Subdivision D—General provisions relating to offences under this Division

271.10 Jurisdictional requirement for offences other than offences related to domestic trafficking in persons
    Section 15.2 (extended geographical jurisdiction—category B) applies to an offence against section 271.2, 271.3, 271.4, 271.8 or 271.9.
271.11 Jurisdictional requirement for offences related to domestic trafficking in persons
    A person commits an offence against section 271.5, 271.6 or 271.7 only if one or more of the following paragraphs applies:
       (a) the conduct constituting the offence occurs to any extent outside Australia;
       (b) the conduct constituting the offence involves transportation across State borders, either for reward or in connection with a commercial arrangement;
       (c) the conduct constituting the offence occurs within a Territory or involves transportation to or from a Territory;
       (d) the conduct constituting the offence is engaged in by, or on behalf of, a constitutional corporation, or in circumstances where the victims of the trafficking conduct were intended to be employed by a constitutional corporation;
       (e) some of the conduct constituting the offence is engaged in by communication using a postal, telegraphic or telephonic service within the meaning of paragraph 51(v) of the Constitution;
       (f) the victim of the conduct constituting the offence is an alien for the purposes of paragraph 51(xix) of the Constitution.
271.12 Other laws not excluded
    This Division is not intended to exclude or limit the operation of any other law of the Commonwealth or any law of a State or Territory.
271.13 Double jeopardy
    If a person has been convicted or acquitted in a country outside Australia of an offence against the law of that country in respect of any conduct, the person cannot be convicted of an offence against this Division in respect of that conduct.
# Criminal Damage Act

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Criminal Damage Act."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Criminal Damage Act 1971 (c. 48), an UK Act of Parliament that criminalizes damage to property.
* Criminal Damage Act, 1991 (No. 31 of 1991), an Irish Act providing for similar issues.
# Criminal History Background Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2008

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Criminal History Background Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2008."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Public Law 110-296: Criminal History Background Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2008 (1st)
* Public Law 110-408: Criminal History Background Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2008 (2nd)
# Criminal History Background Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2008 (2nd)

Note: This is the original legislation as it was initially enacted. Any subsequent amendments hosted on Wikisource may be listed using What Links Here.
An Act To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain criminal history background checks.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

### Section 1. Short Title.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Criminal History Background Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2008´´.

### Sec. 2. Extension of Pilot Program.

    Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (42 U.S.C. 5119a note) is amended by striking ``a 66-month´´ and inserting ``a 78-month´´.
Approved October 13, 2008.

## Legislative History

* S. 3605
   * CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
   ** Sept. 26, considered and passed Senate.
   ** Sept. 27, considered and passed House.

## See also

* Criminal History Background Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2008 (1st) (Public Law 110-296)
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Criminal History Background Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2008 (1st)

This amendment was changed further during the 110th session in Public Law 110-408
Note: This is the original legislation as it was initially enacted. Any subsequent amendments hosted on Wikisource may be listed using What Links Here.
An Act To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain criminal history background checks.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

### SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Criminal History Background Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2008''.

### SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM.

    Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (42 U.S.C. 5119a note) is amended by striking ``a 60-month'' and inserting ``a 66-month''.
Approved July 30, 2008.

## LEGISLATIVE HISTORY

* S. 3218
* CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
** June 26, considered and passed Senate.
** July 14, considered and passed House.

## See also

* Criminal History Background Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2008 (2nd) (Public Law 110-408)
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Cur Deus Homo/Book Second/Chapter 15
### CHAPTER XV

How this death removes even the sins of his murderers.
Boso. This is properly so with regard to all sins not affecting the person of the Deity. But let me ask you one thing more. If it be as great an evil to slay him as his life is a good, how can his death overcome and destroy the sins of those who slew him? Or, if it destroys the sin of any one of them, how can it not also destroy any sin committed by other men? For we believe that many men will be saved, and a vast many will not be saved.
Anselm. The Apostle answers the question when he says: "Had they known it, they would never have crucified the Lord of glory." For a sin knowingly committed and a sin done ignorantly are so different that an evil which they could never do, were its full extent known, may be pardonable when done in ignorance. For no man could ever, knowingly at least, slay the Lord; and, therefore, those who did it in ignorance did not rush into that transcendental crime with which none others can be compared. For this crime, the magnitude of which we have been considering as equal to the worth of his life, we have not looked at as having been ignorantly done, but knowingly; a thing which no man ever did or could do.
Boso. You have reasonably shown that the murderers of Christ can obtain pardon for their sin.
Anselm. What more do you ask? For now you, see how reason of necessity shows that the celestial state must be made up from men, and that this can only be by the forgiveness of sins, which man can never have but by man, who must be at the same time Divine, and reconcile sinners to God by his own death. Therefore have we clearly found that Christ, whom we confess to be both God and man, died for us; and, when this is known beyond all doubt, all things which he says of himself must be acknowledged as true, for God cannot lie, and all he does must be received as wisely done, though we do not understand the reason of it.
Boso. What you say is true; and I do not for a moment doubt that his words are true, and all that he does reasonable. But I ask this in order that you may disclose to me, in their true rationality, those things in Christian faith which seem to infidels improper or impossible; and this, not to strengthen me in the faith, but to gratify one already confirmed by the knowledge of the truth itself.
# Cur Deus Homo/Book Second/Chapter 14
### CHAPTER XIV

How his death outweighs the number and greatness of our sins.
Boso. Now I ask you to tell me how his death can outweigh the number and magnitude of our sins, when the least sin we can think of you have shown to be so monstrous that, were there an infinite number of worlds as full of created existence as this, they could not stand, but would fall back into nothing, sooner than one look should be made contrary to the just will of God.
Anselm. Were that man here before you, and you knew who he was, and it were told you that, if you did not kill him, the whole universe, except God, would perish, would you do it to preserve the rest of creation?
Boso. No! not even were an infinite number of worlds displayed before me.
Anselm. But suppose you were told: "If you do not kill him, all the sins of the world will be heaped upon you."
Boso. I should answer, that I would far rather bear all other sins, not only those of this world, past and future, but also all others that can be conceived of, than this alone. And I think I ought to say this, not only with regard to killing him, but even as to the slightest injury which could be inflicted on him.
Anselm. You judge correctly; but tell me why it is that your heart recoils from one injury inflicted upon him as more heinous than all other sins that can be thought of, inasmuch as all sins whatsoever are committed against him?
Boso. A sin committed upon his person exceeds beyond comparison all the sins which can be thought of, that do not affect his person.
Anselm. What say you to this, that one often suffers freely certain evils in his person, in order not to suffer greater ones in his property?
Boso. God has no need of such patience, for all things lie in subjection to his power, as you answered a certain question of mine above.
Anselm. You say well; and hence we see that no enormity or multitude of sins, apart from the Divine person, can for a moment be compared with a bodily injury inflicted upon that man.
Boso. This is most plain.
Anselm. How great does this good seem to you, if the destruction of it is such an evil?
Boso. If its existence is as great a good as its destruction is an evil, then is it far more a good than those sins are evils which its destruction so far surpasses.
Anselm. Very true. Consider, also, that sins are as hateful as they are evil, and that life is only amiable in proportion as it is good. And, therefore, it follows that that life is more lovely than sins are odious.
Boso. I cannot help seeing this.
Anselm. And do you not think that so great a good in itself so lovely, can avail to pay what is due for the sins of the whole world?
Boso. Yes! it has even infinite value.
Anselm. Do you see, then, how this life conquers all sins, if it be given for them?
Boso. Plainly.
Anselm. If, then, to lay down life is the same as to suffer death, as the gift of his life surpasses all the sins of men, so will also the suffering of death.