OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Book of Common Prayer (ECUSA)/Daily Office Lectionary

Daily Office Lectionary
​Concerning the Daily Office Lectionary
The Daily Office Lectionary is arranged in a two-year cycle. Year One begins on the First Sunday of Advent preceding odd-numbered years, and Year Two begins on the First Sunday of Advent preceding even-numbered years. (Thus, on the First Sunday of Advent, 1976, the Lectionary for Year One is begun.)
Three Readings are provided for each Sunday and weekday in each of the two years. Two of the Readings may be used in the morning and one in the evening; or, if the Office is read only once in the day, all three Readings may be used. When the Office is read twice in the day, it is suggested that the Gospel Reading be used in the evening in Year One, and in the morning in Year Two. If two Readings are desired at both Offices, the Old Testament Reading for the alternate year is used as the First Reading at Evening Prayer.
When more than one Reading is used at an Office, the first is always from the Old Testament (or the Apocrypha).
When a Major Feast interrupts the sequence of Readings, they may be re-ordered by lengthening, combining, or omitting some of them, to secure continuity or avoid repetition.
Any Reading may be lengthened at discretion. Suggested lengthenings are shown in parentheses.
In this Lectionary (except in the weeks from 4 Advent to 1 Epiphany, and Palm Sunday to 2 Easter), the Psalms are arranged in a seven-week pattern which recurs throughout the year, except for appropriate variations in Lent and Easter Season.
In the citation of the Psalms, those for the morning are given first, and then those for the evening. At the discretion of the officiant, however, any of the Psalms appointed for a given day may be used in the morning or in the evening. Likewise, Psalms appointed for any day may be used on any other day in the same week, except on major Holy Days.
​Brackets and parentheses are used (brackets in the case of whole Psalms, parentheses in the case of verses) to indicate Psalms and verses of Psalms which may be omitted. In some instances, the entire portion of the Psalter assigned to a given Office has been bracketed, and alternative Psalmody provided. Those who desire to recite the Psalter in its entirety should, in each instance, use the bracketed Psalms rather than the alternatives.
Antiphons drawn from the Psalms themselves, or from the opening sentences given in the Offices, or from other passages of Scripture, may be used with the Psalms and biblical Canticles. The antiphons may be sung or said at the beginning and end of each Psalm or Canticle, or may be used as refrains after each verse or group of verses.
On Special Occasions, the officiant may select suitable Psalms and Readings.
Year One 936 Year Two 937 Holy Days 996 Special Occasions 1000
# Book of Common Prayer (ECUSA)

* related portals: Book of Common Prayer.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, quotes, Wikidata item.
This is a 2007 printing of the 1979 Book of Common Prayer used by The Episcopal Church. The 2007 revision includes a few additions to the Calendar as well as a revised Common Lectionary for Sunday Services.
​The Book of Common Prayer
and Administration of the Sacraments and Other Rites and Ceremonies of the Church
Together with The Psalter or Psalms of David
According to the use of The Episcopal Church
Church Publishing Incorporated, New York
​Table of Contents
The Ratification of the Book of Common Prayer 8 The Preface 9 Concerning the Service of the Church 13 The Calendar of the Church Year 15
The Daily Office Daily Morning Prayer: Rite One 37 Daily Evening Prayer: Rite One 61 Daily Morning Prayer: Rite Two 75 Noonday Prayer 103 Order of Worship for the Evening 108 Daily Evening Prayer: Rite Two 115 Compline 127 Daily Devotions for Individuals and Families 137 Table of Suggested Canticles 144
The Great Litany 148
The Collects: Traditional Seasons of the Year 159 Holy Days 185 Common of Saints 195 Various Occasions 199
​The Collects: Contemporary Seasons of the Year 211 Holy Days 237 Common of Saints 246 Various Occasions 251
Proper Liturgies for Special Days Ash Wednesday 264 Palm Sunday 270 Maundy Thursday 274 Good Friday 276 Holy Saturday 283 The Great Vigil of Easter 285
Holy Baptism 299
The Holy Eucharist An Exhortation 316 A Penitential Order: Rite One 319 The Holy Eucharist: Rite One 323 A Penitential Order: Rite Two 351 The Holy Eucharist: Rite Two 355 Prayers of the People 383 Communion under Special Circumstances 396 An Order for Celebrating the Holy Eucharist 400
Pastoral Offices Confirmation 413 A Form of Commitment to Christian Service 420 Celebration and Blessing of a Marriage 423 The Blessing of a Civil Marriage 433 An Order for Marriage 435 Thanksgiving for the Birth or Adoption of a Child 439 Reconciliation of a Penitent 447 Ministration to the Sick 453 Ministration at the Time of Death 462 ​Burial of the Dead: Rite One 469 Burial of the Dead: Rite Two 491 An Order for Burial 506
Episcopal Services Ordination of a Bishop 511 Ordination of a Priest 525 Ordination of a Deacon 537 Litany for Ordinations 548 Celebration of a New Ministry 557 Consecration of a Church or Chapel 567
The Psalter, or Psalms of David 585
Prayers and Thanksgivings 810
An Outline of the Faith, or Catechism 845
Historical Documents of the Church 864 (including the Articles of Religion)
Tables for Finding the Date of Easter and other Holy Days 880
The Lectionary 888 Year A 889 Year B 900 Year C 911 Holy Days 921 Common of Saints 925 Various Occasions 927
Daily Office Lectionary 934 Seasons of the Year 936 Holy Days 996 Special Occasions 1000
This work is in the public domain worldwide because it has been so released by the copyright holder.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Arabian Poetry for English Readers

ARABIAN POETRY
FOR
ENGLISH READERS.
EDITED, WITH INTRODUCTION AND NOTES,
BY
W. A. CLOUSTON.
The Arabian Poets were the historians and moralists of the age; and if they sympathised with the prejudices, they inspired and crowned the virtues of their countrymen: the indissoluble union of generosity and valour was the darling theme of their song.—Gibbon.
GLASGOW: PRIVATELY PRINTED. MDCCCLXXXI.
Edition:
M$^c$LAREN AND SON, PRINTERS, 50 WELLINGTON STREET, GLASGOW.
CONTENTS.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Arabian Poetry for English Readers/The Moallakát

THE
MOALLAKÁT,
OR
Seven Arabian Poems,
WHICH WERE SUSPENDED ON
THE TEMPLE AT MECCA.
TRANSLATED, WITH ARGUMENTS,
BY
SIR WILLIAM JONES.
The Poems entitled Almoällakât exhibit an exact picture of their virtues and their vices, their wisdom and their folly; and show what may be constantly expected from men of open hearts and boiling passions, with no law to control, and little religion to restrain them.—Sir W. Jones: Discourse on The Arabs.
* The Poem of Amriolkais
* The Poem of Tarafa
* The Poem of Zohair
* The Poem of Lebeid
* The Poem of Antara
* The Poem of Amru
* The Poem of Hareth
# Arabian Poetry for English Readers/Shorter Poems/On the Capture of Jerusalem in the First Crusade

* related portals: Islamic poetry, Crusades.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Translated in 1881.
FROM our distended eyeballs flow A mingled stream of tears and blood; Nor care we feel, nor wish we know, But who shall pour the largest flood.
But what defence can tears afford? What aid supply in this dread hour? When, kindled by the sparkling sword, War's raging flames the land devour!
No more let sleep's seductive charms Upon your torpid souls be shed: A crash like this, such dire alarms, Might burst the slumbers of the dead.
Think where your dear companions lie— Survey their fate, and hear their woes: How some through trackless deserts fly, Some in the vulture's maw repose;
While some, more wretched still, must bear The tauntings of a Christian's tongue;— Hear this—and blush ye not to wear The silken robe of peace so long?
Remember what ensanguined showers The Syrian plains with crimson dyed; And think how many blooming flowers In Syrian forts their beauties hide.
Arabian youths! in such a cause Can ye the voice of glory slight? Warriors of Persia! Can ye pause, Or fear to mingle in the fight?
If neither piety nor shame Your breasts can warm, your souls can move, Let emulation's bursting flame Wake you to Vengeance and to Love!
# Ballance v. Forsyth (62 U.S. 389)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
62 U.S. 389
Ballance v. Forsyth
This case was dismissed on the 20th of December last, because it did not appear that an appeal had been taken in the District Court. A motion has now been made to reinstate the case, and, in support of that motion, a written agreement, signed by the counsel for the appellant and appellee, has been filed, consenting to reinstate the case, to waive all irregularities, and to try to the case on the merits.
But the consent of parties cannot give jurisdiction to this court, where the law does not give it. And, without an appeal taken in the District Court, this court has no jurisdiction, and the consent of parties cannot cure the defect. The motion is therefore overruled.
But if the plaintiff in error desires to supply the omission, and take an appeal in the District Court, and bring his case legally before us, he has leave, in order to save expense, to withdraw the transcript now filed, and to use it upon his appeal, leaving a receipt for it with the clerk of this court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ballance v. Papin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
60 U.S. 342
Ballance v. Papin
THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the northern district of Illinois.
It was similar in most of its features to the preceding case, and was argued by Mr. Ballance for the plaintiff in error, and submitted on printed arguments by Mr. Williams and Mr. Gamble for the defendants.
Mr. Justice CATRON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ballarat

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Ballarat."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Ballarat," in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
* "Ballarat," in The New Student's Reference Work, Chicago: F.E. Compton and Co. (1914)
* "Ballarat and Ballarat East," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
# Ballance v. Forsyth (62 U.S. 389)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
62 U.S. 389
Ballance v. Forsyth
THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the northern district of Illinois.
It was dismissed, and a motion made to reinstate it, under the circumstances stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ballanden

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Ballanden."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Bellenden, Adam, Bishop of Dunblane and Aberdeen, 2nd son of John (d.1577)
* Bellenden, John (fl.1533-1587), Scottish poet
* Bellenden, John (d.1577), Lord Auchinoul, Scottish lawyer
* Bellenden, Lewis, Lord Auchinoul, Scottish lawyer, 1st son of John
* Bellenden, William (d.1633?), Scottish professor
* Bellenden, William (d.1671), Lord Bellenden, treasurer-depute of Scotland
# Ballance v. Papin/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
60 U.S. 342
Ballance v. Papin
In the case of Charles Ballance against Papin and Atchison, the same title was relied on by the defendant below (Ballance) that was set up in defence in the preceding case of Forsyth v. Brien and Rouse. The plaintiff sued to recover a village lot in Peoria, No. 42, confirmed to Fontaine, in right of his wife, Josette Cassarau, dit Fontaine. A plat of lot No. 42 was given in evidence, and is found in the record, but no certificate of the surveyor accompanies this plat, and without such certificate there is no evidence that lot No. 42 was lawfully surveyed. The act of 1823 (sec. 2) required that a survey should be made of each lot confirmed to the claimant, and a plat thereof forwarded to the Secretary. The evidence of a legal United States survey is not a mere plat, without any written description of the land by metes and bounds; neither the plat, nor less proof than a written description, will make a record on which a patent can issue. That most accurate evidence of separate surveys of the village lots of Peoria exists, we know; but as none is found in this record of lot No. 42, it follows, from the reasons given in the previous case, that no title was adduced in the Circuit Court that authorized it to reject the instructions demanded by the defendant; that, comparing the titles of the parties by their face, the defendant's was the better one. But as the same question of the application of the act of limitations arises in this case as it did in the former one, it must of course have been reversed, had the certificate of survey been found in the record. We therefore order that the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded for another trial to be had therein.
Mr. Justice McLEAN dissented.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ballance v. Forsyth (65 U.S. 183)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
65 U.S. 183
Ballance v. Forsyth
THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the northern district of Illinois.
It was a sequel to the case of Ballance v. Forsyth, reported in 13 Howard, 18. After the mandate went down from this court, Ballance filed a bill on the equity side of the court, setting forth the same titles that were involved in the suit at law, and praying relief upon certain special grounds, which it is not necessary to enumerate.
It was argued by the same counsel as the two preceding cases.
Mr. Justice CAMPBELL delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Botanical Gazette/V10

Volumes 9 & 10 were bound together. Volume 10 runs from pages 203-430.
EDITOR: JOHN M. COULTER, Wabash College, Crawfordsville, Ind. ASSOCIATE EDITORS:
* C. R. BARNES, Perdue University, La Fayette, Ind.
* J. C. ARTHUR, N. Y. Agric. Exper. Station, Geneva, N. Y.
CONTENTS
# Botanical Gazette/V11

* THE
* Botanical Gazette
* EDITORS:
* JOHN M. COULTER, Wabash College, Crawfordsville, Ind.
* CHARLES R. BARNES, Purdue University, Lafayette, Ind.
* J. C. ARTHUR, N. Y. Agric. Exp. Sta., Geneva, N. Y.
* Volume XI
* 1886
* CRAWFORDSVILLE. INDIANA
* PUBLISHED BY THE EDITORS
* TABLE OF CONTENTS.
| Asa Gray (portrait) | Charles R. Barnes. | 1 |
| Birthday Congratulations | .   .   .   .   . | 6 |
| Pollen-spores of Tradescantia Virginica (plate I) | J. M. Coulter and J. N. Rose. | 10 |
| A new larval Entomophthora (plate II) | J. C. Arthur. | 14 |
# Botanical Gazette/V49

EDITORS: JOHN MERLE COULTER AND CHARLES REID BARNES
DATES OF PUBLICATION
* No. 1, January 22;
* No. 2, February 16;
* No. 3, March 15;
* No. 4, April 19;
* No. 5, May 17;
** Charles Reid Barnes (with portrait)
* No. 6, June 23.
# Botanical Miscellany

* Volume 1 (1830)
* Volume 2 (1831)
* Volume 3 (1833)
This work is in the public domain in Australia because it was created in Australia and the term of copyright has expired. According to Australian Copyright Council - Duration of Copyright, the following works are public domain:
* published non-government works whose author died before January 1, 1955,
* anonymous or pseudonymous works and photographs published before January 1, 1955, and
* government works published more than 50 years ago (before January 1, 1974).
This work is also in the public domain in the United States because it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days), and it was first published before 1989 without complying with U.S. copyright formalities (renewal and/or copyright notice) and it was in the public domain in Australia on the URAA date (January 1, 1996). This is the combined effect of Australia having joined the Berne Convention in 1928, and of 17 USC 104A with its critical date of January 1, 1996.
Because the Australian copyright term in 1996 was 50 years, the critical date for copyright in the United States under the URAA is January 1, 1946.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Botanical Gazette/V09/Schweinitz and American Hepaticea

Published in the Botanical Gazette, Vol. 9 (1884), p. 63.
Schweinitz and American Hepaticæ.— The paper which Schweinitz as a mycolologist, in the February Gazette, suggests his relation to the study of American Hepaticæ.   Michaux was the earliest writer on this group, describing 13 species, five of which were new (Flora II, 276-280), but Schweinitz published the first work devoted entirely to the hepatics.  The work is now rarely seen, having been printed at Raleigh in 1821.  Its full title is as follows: "Specimen Floræ Americæ Septentrionalis Cryptogamicæ sistens Muscos hue usque in Am. Sept. observatos."  As its title indicates, the work is entirely in Latin, and contains in its 27 pages descriptions of 77 species of which 12 are regarded as new, if we include Targionia orbicularis,$^1$ which had been partially described by Michaux as Jungermannia orbicularis.  Of thes, 58 belonged to the single genus Jungermannia, not broken up then as now, into so many genera.  Of the eleven described as new, one, Riccia lutescens, has remained unchanged; one Jungermannia clypeata, remains as Phragmicoma clypeata, Sulliv., while the remainder, viz., Jungermannia ciliifera, J. ditans, J. bipinnata, J. platyphylloidea, J. transversalis, J. oblonga, J. sinuata, Anthoceros lacinatus and A. jungermanioides are consigned to the fellowship of other synonyms which so sadly mar(k) American botany, representing, as they do, an over ardent ambition unaccompanied by sufficient patient investigation. — Lucien M. Underwood, Syracuse University.
[Note. — In this connection it seems appropriate to say that Mr. Eugene Rau writes that Schwinitz was born in 1780, not 1794, as the February Gazette has it. — Ed.]
# Botanical Gazette/V40

EDITORS: JOHN MERLE COULTER AND CHARLES REID BARNES
* No. 1, July
* No. 2, August
* No. 3, September
* No. 4, October
* No. 5, November
* No. 6, December
** A New Genus of Ophioglossaceae, p. 455
# Brazil

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Brazil."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Brazil," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Brazil," in The World Factbook, (ed.) by CIA (1982)
* "Brazil," in CIA World Fact Book, (ed.) by CIA (2004)

## See also

* Portal:Brazil
# Blood of the Eagle

Extracted from Munsey's magazine, May 1922, pp. 740-768
Blood of the Eagle
A COMPLETE NOVELETTE—HOW A MAN OF MYSTERY CAME TO ROYAL POWER IN A HIDDEN KINGDOM OF THE FAR EAST
By H. Bedford-Jones

### CONTENTS

* Chapter 1
* Chapter 2
* Chapter 3
* Chapter 4
* Chapter 5
* Chapter 6
* Chapter 7
* Chapter 8
* Chapter 9
* Chapter 10
* Chapter 11
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1941, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 82 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Burr v. Duryee

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Burr v. Duryee."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Burr v. Duryee (68 U.S. 531)
* Burr v. Duryee (68 U.S. 579)
* Burr v. Duryee (68 U.S. 581)
# Burrell v. Montana

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
194 U.S. 572
Burrell v. Montana
Argued: April 13, 1904. --- Decided: May 31, 1904
Mr. E. C. Day for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 572-574 intentionally omitted]
Mr. James Donovan for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Burr v. City of Columbus Ohio/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
249 U.S. 415
Burr v. City of Columbus Ohio
Argued: Jan. 10, 1919. ---
This case was argued and submitted with No. 715, just decided. 249 U.S. 399, 39 Sup. Ct. 349, 63 L. Ed. 669. It was brought by owners and holders of more than $200,000 of certain mortgage bonds of the street railway company. The bill alleged diversity of citizenship, and also rights alleged to arise under the Constitution. The case was heard upon motion for a temporary injunction and upon defendant's motion to dismiss the bill. The injunction was refused, the motion to dismiss was granted and a decree entered accordingly. To all intents the case is controlled by the decision in No. 715. The decree of the District Court is
Affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Burr v. Duryee (68 U.S. 531)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
68 U.S. 531
Burr v. Duryee

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse