OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Report of a Tour through the Bengal Provinces/Baragaon 2

BARAGAON.
I cannot take leave of Baragaon and its vicinity without alluding to Mr. Broadley's excavations at, and his account of, Nâlanda. While giving him credit for zeal and exertion, I cannot but feel that the excavation of this temple, which General Cunningham assigns to the 1st century A. D., was not a work which Mr. Broadley should have undertaken ​without professional assistance. From a perusal of his account, it is impossible to make out with any degree of certainty, or even lucidity, the details of the temple which he has excavated and destroyed, for the pillars, doorway, &c., have long ago been by him removed to Bihár. He has indeed ventured to give a restored elevation of the great temple; but though this makes a very effective plate, and his description is good enough for a "popular account," they are next to worthless for all scientific purposes; and in the interest of true archæology, I venture to enter a strong protest against acts which destroy such interesting ruins without preserving detailed and minute measurements of what is thus destroyed. In exposing ancient ruins buried under ground, destruction of parts, and often wholesale destruction, is sometimes inevitable; but there is no reason why careful and detailed measurements should not be preserved before the work of destruction is proceeded with. These measurements should in fact be made with even more than ordinary care and in most minute detail, for the simple reason that future reference and verification is impossible. I trust my feeble voice will have some effect in adding that discretion to the laudable zeal of explorers, without which they risk destroying for ever that which is of solid and enduring interest.
# Report of a Tour through the Bengal Provinces/Barat

BARAT.
Barat is a largish village on the north of, and close to, the road; this place is said to have been the residence of the Saint Valmiki when Sita was sent into exile. At his orders ​Viswakarman constructed the rock cave noticed above for Sita's residence. At present the only object of notice here is an old mud fort standing on a high mound; the fort is said to have been the garh of Durinarayan Chaudhari Hartakya Brahman; it is 300 feet long by 250 feet wide, rectangular; its interior is about 20 feet above the level of the fields adjacent; above this the earthen parapets tower another 20 feet or so; the parapets are built entirely of mud, precisely like the mud walls of the large huts of the present day; but these walls appear to have been baked or in some way submitted superficially to the action of fire after being built; the fort is a plain oblong with a round tower at each corner.
# Sefer Ha-yashar, or, the Book of Jasher (1840)/Chapter 91

$^1$At that time, after the death of Joshua, the children of the Canaanites were still in the land, and the Israelites resolved to drive them out.
$^2$And the children of Israel asked of the Lord, saying, Who shall first go up for us to the Canaanites to fight against them? and the Lord said, Judah shall go up.
$^3$And the children of Judah said to Simeon, Go up with us into our lot, and we will fight against the Canaanites and we likewise will go up with you, in your lot, so the children of Simeon went with the children of Judah.
$^4$And the children of Judah went up and fought against the Canaanites, so the Lord delivered the Canaanites into the hands of the children of Judah, and they smote them in Bezek, ten thousand men.
$^5$And they fought with Adonibezek in Bezek, and he fled from before them, and they pursued him and caught him, and they took hold of him and cut off his thumbs and great toes.
$^6$And Adonibezek said, Three score and ten kings having their thumbs and great toes cut off, gathered their meat under my table, as I have done, so God has requited me, and they brought him to Jerusalem and he died there.
$^7$And the children of Simeon went with the children of Judah, and they smote the Canaanites with the edge of the sword.
$^8$And the Lord was with the children of Judah, and they possessed the mountain, and the children of Joseph went up to Bethel, the same is Luz, and the Lord was with them.
$^9$And the children of Joseph spied out Bethel, and the watchmen saw a man going forth from the city, and they caught him and said unto him, Show us now the entrance of the city and we will show kindness to thee.
$^{10}$And that man showed them the entrance of the city, and the children of Joseph came and smote the City with the edge of the sword.
$^{11}$And the man with his family they sent away, and he went to the Hittites and he built a city, and he called the name thereof Luz, so all the Israelites dwelt in their cities, and the children at Israel dwelt in their cities, and the children of Israel served the Lord all the days of Joshua, and all the days of the elders, who had lengthened their days after Joshua, and saw the great work of the Lord, which he had performed for Israel.
$^{12}$And the elders judged Israel after the death of Joshua for seventeen years.
$^{13}$And all the elders also fought the battles of Israel against the Canaanites and the Lord drove the Canaanites from before the children of Israel, in order to place the Israelites in their land.
$^{14}$And he accomplished all the words which he had spoken to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and the oath which he had sworn, to give to them and to their children, the land of the Canaanites.
$^{15}$And the Lord gave to the children of Israel the whole land of Canaan, as he had sworn to their ancestors, and the Lord gave them rest from those around them, and the children of Israel dwelt securely in their cities.
$^{16}$Blessed be the Lord for ever, amen, and amen.
$^{17}$Strengthen yourselves, and let the hearts of all you that trust in the Lord be of good courage.
THE END
# S.S. Bremen

Hymn: words and illustration by G. Howell-Baker, music by E. Edgar Evans.
S.S. Bremen
Words by G. Howell-Baker Music by E. Edgar Evans
Amen
The God of Day, Thy sunshine send, Thy starry night, and hush to sleep Each rising storm, that peace may be Upon the deep.
No warring clouds or ruthless gale Disturb the calm of summer seas No warrior billow crowned with foam Defy the breeze.
No bank or rock they passage bar, No misty hand efface the light That shines upon the heaving deep Each day and night.
For He, who slept amid the storm Upon the sea of Gallillee Awoke & poured His own sweet sleep Upon The Sea.
Thy Presence, Lord upon the deep! Grant us this prayer to be Thy will, And breathe these words upon the winds O peace, be still!
The End.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# S. H.

* S. H. in May-day and other pieces (1867)
* S. H. in Poems (Household Edition, 1904)
# Republic Natural Gas Company v. Oklahoma

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Douglas

## Dissenting Opinion

    Rutledge
United States Supreme Court
334 U.S. 62
Republic Natural Gas Company v. Oklahoma
Argued: Jan. 6, 1948. --- Decided: May 3, 1948
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma.
Messrs. Robert M. Rainey, of Oklahoma City, Okl., and John F. Eberhardt, of Wichita, Kan., for appellant.
Mr. Earl Pruet, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellees.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Republic Natural Gas Company v. Oklahoma/Concurrence Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Douglas
* Dissenting Opinion Rutledge
United States Supreme Court
334 U.S. 62
Republic Natural Gas Company v. Oklahoma
Argued: Jan. 6, 1948. --- Decided: May 3, 1948
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring.
The judgment of the Oklahoma court is not 'final' merely because it establishes that Republic has no right to drain away the Peerless gas without paying for it. I think it would be conceded that, even so, the judgment would not be 'final' if it offered appellant three alternative ways to comply and there were doubts as to the constitutionality of any one of them. Then we would wait to see which of the alternatives was ultimately selected or imposed before reviewing the constitutionality of any of them. But there would be no more reason to defer decision on the merits in that case than in this. For the constitutional questions would be isolated in each and we woud be as uncertain in one as in the other which of the alternatives would actually apply to appellant. And the principle seems to me to be the same even when a majority of us would sustain the order whatever alternative was chosen as its sanction.
There is, of course, in the one case the chance of saving the order only if one remedy rather than another is chosen, while in the other the order would survive whichever was chosen. But in each we would be giving needless constitutional dissertations on some points. That is nontheless true in a case where the constitutional questions seem to a majority of us simple, uncomplicated and of no great dignity. For the single constitutional question necessary for decision will not be isolated until the precise pinch of the order on the appellant is known. It will not be known in the present case at least until appellant elects or is required (1) to shut down, (2) to become a carrier of the Peerless gas, or (3) to purchase it.
The legal, as well as the economic, relationship which Republic will bear to Peerless will vary as one or another choice is made. To make Republic a 'carrier' is to submit it to different business risks than to make it a 'purchaser.' The fact that each would raise only questions of 'due process' under the Fourteenth Amendment does not mean that the questions are identical. Even when reasonableness is the test, judges have developed great contrariety of opinions. The point is that today the variables are presented only in the abstract. Tomorrow the facts will be known, when the precise impact of the order on appellant will be determined. Thus to me the policy against premature constitutional adjudication precludes us from saying the judgment in the present case is 'final.'
Mr. Justice RUTLEDGE, with whom Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice MURPHY, and Mr. Justice BURTON join, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Republic Steel Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
311 U.S. 7
Republic Steel Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
Argued: Oct. 17, 1940. --- Decided: Nov 11, 12, 1940
Messrs. Luther Day and Thomas F. Patton, both of Cleveland, Ohio, Joseph W. Henderson, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Mortimer S. Gordon, of New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Robert H. Jackson, Atty. Gen., and Thomas E. Harris, of Washington D.C., for respondent, National Labor Relations Board.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Republic Steel Corporation v. Maddox

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
379 U.S. 650
Republic Steel Corporation v. Maddox
Argued: Nov. 18, 1964. --- Decided: Jan 25, 1965
Samuel H. Burr, Birmingham, Ala., for petitioner.
Richard L. Jones, Birmingham, Ala., for respondent.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 52

LII.
So am I as the rich, whose blessed key
Can bring him to his sweet up-locked treasure,
The which he will not every hour survey,
For blunting the fine point of seldom pleasure.
Therefore are feasts so solemn and so rare,
Since, seldom coming, in that long year set,
Like stones of worth they thinly placed are,
Or captain jewels in the carcanet.
So is the time that keeps you as my chest,
Or as the wardrobe which the robe doth hide,
To make some special instant special blest,
By new unfolding his imprison'd pride. Blessed are you, whose worthiness gives scope, Being had, to triumph, being lack'd, to hope.
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 53

LIII.
What is your substance, whereof are you made,
That millions of strange shadows on you tend?
Since every one hath, every one, one shade,
And you, but one, can every shadow lend.
Describe Adonis, and the counterfeit
Is poorly imitated after you;
On Helen's cheek all art of beauty set,
And you in Grecian tires are painted new:
Speak of the spring and foison of the year,
The one doth shadow of your beauty show,
The other as your bounty doth appear;
And you in every blessed shape we know. In all external grace you have some part, But you like none, none you, for constant heart.
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 6

VI.
Then let not winter's ragged hand deface In thee thy summer, ere thou be distill'd: Make sweet some vial; treasure thou some place With beauty's treasure, ere it be self-kill'd. That use is not forbidden usury Which happies those that pay the willing loan; That's for thy self to breed another thee, Or ten times happier, be it ten for one; Ten times thy self were happier than thou art, If ten of thine ten times refigur'd thee: Then what could death do if thou shouldst depart, Leaving thee living in posterity? Be not self-will'd, for thou art much too fair To be death's conquest and make worms thine heir.
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 54

LIV.
O! how much more doth beauty beauteous seem
By that sweet ornament which truth doth give.
The rose looks fair, but fairer we it deem
For that sweet odour, which doth in it live.
The canker blooms have full as deep a dye
As the perfumed tincture of the roses.
Hang on such thorns, and play as wantonly
When summer's breath their masked buds discloses:
But, for their virtue only is their show,
They live unwoo'd, and unrespected fade;
Die to themselves. Sweet roses do not so;
Of their sweet deaths, are sweetest odours made:
    And so of you, beauteous and lovely youth,
    When that shall vade, by verse distills your truth.
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 55

LV.
Not marble, nor the gilded monuments
Of princes, shall outlive this powerful rhyme;
But you shall shine more bright in these contents
Than unswept stone, besmear'd with sluttish time.
When wasteful war shall statues overturn,
And broils root out the work of masonry,
Nor Mars his sword, nor war's quick fire shall burn
The living record of your memory.
'Gainst death, and all-oblivious enmity
Shall you pace forth; your praise shall still find room
Even in the eyes of all posterity
That wear this world out to the ending doom.
    So, till the judgment that yourself arise,
    You live in this, and dwell in lovers' eyes.
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 58

LVIII.
That god forbid, that made me first your slave,
I should in thought control your times of pleasure,
Or at your hand the account of hours to crave,
Being your vassal, bound to stay your leisure!
O, let me suffer, being at your beck,
The imprison'd absence of your liberty;
And patience, tame to sufferance, bide each check,
Without accusing you of injury.
Be where you list, your charter is so strong
That you yourself may privilege your time
To what you will; to you it doth belong
Yourself to pardon of self-doing crime.
    I am to wait, though waiting so be hell,
    Not blame your pleasure be it ill or well.
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 56

LVI.
Sweet love, renew thy force; be it not said
Thy edge should blunter be than appetite,
Which but to-day by feeding is allay'd,
To-morrow sharpened in his former might:
So, love, be thou, although to-day thou fill
Thy hungry eyes, even till they wink with fulness,
To-morrow see again, and do not kill
The spirit of love, with a perpetual dulness.
Let this sad interim like the ocean be
Which parts the shore, where two contracted new
Come daily to the banks, that when they see
Return of love, more blest may be the view;
    Or call it winter, which being full of care,
    Makes summer's welcome, thrice more wished, more rare.
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 57

LVII.
Being your slave what should I do but tend,
Upon the hours, and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend;
Nor services to do, till you require.
Nor dare I chide the world-without-end hour,
Whilst I, my sovereign, watch the clock for you,
Nor think the bitterness of absence sour,
When you have bid your servant once adieu;
Nor dare I question with my jealous thought
Where you may be, or your affairs suppose,
But, like a sad slave, stay and think of nought
Save, where you are, how happy you make those.
    So true a fool is love, that in your will,
    Though you do anything, he thinks no ill.
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 59

LIX.
If there be nothing new, but that which is
Hath been before, how are our brains beguil'd,
Which labouring for invention bear amiss
The second burthen of a former child!
O, that record could with a backward look,
Even of five hundred courses of the sun,
Show me your image in some antique book,
Since mind at first in character was done!
That I might see what the old world could say
To this composed wonder of your frame;
Whether we are mended, or wh'r better they,
Or whether revolution be the same.
    O! sure I am the wits of former days,
    To subjects worse have given admiring praise.
# Shakespeare's Sonnets (1883)/Sonnet 60

LX.
Like as the waves make towards the pebbled shore,
So do our minutes hasten to their end;
Each changing place with that which goes before,
In sequent toil all forwards do contend.
Nativity, once in the main of light,
Crawls to maturity, wherewith being crown'd,
Crooked eclipses 'gainst his glory fight,
And Time that gave doth now his gift confound.
Time doth transfix the flourish set on youth
And delves the parallels in beauty's brow,
Feeds on the rarities of nature's truth,
And nothing stands but for his scythe to mow; And yet to times in hope my verse shall stand, Praising thy worth, despite his cruel hand.
# Royal Naval Biography/Mudie, David

Layout 2
DAVID MUDIE, Esq. [Commander.]
Was made a lieutenant in 1782; and employed in raising seamen at Dundee, on the breaking out of the French revolutionary war. He served as first lieutenant at the battle of Copenhagen; obtained the rank of commander in April 1801; and died on the 3d April 1831, aged 76 years.
# Royal Naval Biography/Murray, James Hamilton

Layout 2
JAMES HAMILTON MURRAY, Esq. [Commander.]
Passed his examination, at Portsmouth, in May 1812; obtained his first commission on the 12th Dec. following; and was appointed to the Menelaus frigate. Captain Sir Peter Parker, Jan. 23d, 1813. He assisted in re-capturing a richly laden Spanish ship, mounting 20 guns, and having on board 600,000 dollars in specie, near l’Orient, Feb. 14th, 1814; and was left in command of the Menelaus when his gallant captain and the two senior lieutenants landed to attack an American encampment at Bellair, in the month of Aug. following. He was advanced to his present rank on the 2d Sept. 1828.
​This officer married, in 1834, Frances, youngest daughter of the Hon. Mrs. Pelham, of North Place, Cheltenham.
# Royal Naval Biography/Muston, Thomas Goldwire

Layout 2
THOMAS GOLDWIRE MUSTON, Esq. [Commander.]
Obtained his first commission in July 1804; served as lieutenant under Sir James Saumarez and Lord Gambier, in the Victory and Caledonia, first rates, on the Baltic and Channel stations, and was promoted to the rank of commander, for conducting an explosion vessel into the road of Isle d’Aix, April 11th, 1809. He married, in 1816, Susanna Eliza, daughter of Nathaniel Godbold, of London, Esq.
# Royal Naval Biography/Murley, William

Layout 2
WILLIAM MURLEY, Esq. [Commander.]
Passed his examination in May 1808; and was made a lieutenant on the 29th of the ensuing month. His promotion to the rank of commander took place Oct. 29th, 1813.
# Royal Naval Biography/Murray, James Arthur

Layout 2
JAMES ARTHUR MURRAY, Esq. [Post-Captain of 1816.]
Son of the late Right Hon. Lord William Murray, and nephew to the present Duke of Athol. Was made lieutenant, Sept. 25, 1809; and subsequently appointed to the Unicorn 32, the surgeon of which frigate was sentenced, by a court-martial, to imprisonment in the Marshalsea, for assaulting him at the officers’ mess table. He afterwards joined the America 74, Captain Josias Rowley; and was promoted to the rank of commander, Dec. 6, 1813. His subsequent appointments were. May 14, 1816, to the Griffin brig; Nov. 16 following, as post-captain, to the Spey, of 20 guns, on the St. Helena station; and, Aug. 14, 1824, to the Athol 28, in which ship he returned home, after a three years’ service on the coast of Africa, in the East Indies, and in the Persian Gulph, Sept. 30, 1827.
In March 1818, Captain Murray was tried by a court-martial, at the instance of Rear-Admiral Plampin, for neglecting to supply the island of Ascension, and H.M. late sloop Julia, with necessary stores. The charges against him were not proved, and he was consequently acquitted. He married, in Dec. 1821, Harriett, youngest daughter of the late William Coupland, of St. Mary’s, Shrewsbury, Esq.
Agent.– J. P. Muspratt, Esq.
# Royal Naval Biography/Murray, Robert

Layout 2
ROBERT MURRAY, Esq Admiral of the Blue.
This officer entered the naval service under the auspices of his near relative, the late Hon. Admiral Digby, who was the first nautical tutor of the present illustrious Admiral of the Fleet. He obtained the rank of Post-Captain, Dec. 15, 1782; commanded the Blonde, of 32 guns, during the Spanish armament; and subsequently the Blanche and Triton frigates. At the commencement of the war with the French republic, he was appointed to l’Oiseau of 36 guns; and on the 18th May, 1794, sailed from Plymouth for Halifax, in company with a squadron under the orders of Rear-Admiral Murray.
We next find Captain Murray in the Asia, of 64 guns, bearing the flag of Admiral Vandeput, Commander-in-Chief on the coast of America, where he continued until the demise of that officer in 1800, and then returned to England. He was advanced to the rank of Rear-Admiral, April 23, 1804; became a Vice-Admiral Oct. 25, 1809; and in the summer of 1811 was appointed Commander-in-Chief at North Yarmouth, where he continued during the remainder of the war. His promotion to the rank he now holds took place Aug. 12, 1819.
​On the 12th Sept. 1821, Admiral Murray presided at a meeting held in the Town-Hall, Liverpool, for the purpose of forming an Institution for the promotion of the religious and moral improvement of Seamen, and other persons connected with shipping; and the establishment of a floating chapel.
Residence.– Liverpool .
# Royal Naval Biography/Mundy, George Rodney

Layout 2
GEORGE RODNEY MUNDY, Esq. [Commander.]
A son of Lieutenant-General Godfrey Basil Mundy, by the Hon. Sarah Brydges, youngest daughter of the late Admiral Lord Rodney.
This officer was made a lieutenant in Feb. 1826; advanced to the rank of commander on the 25th Aug. 1828; and appointed to the Favorite sloop, fitting out for the Mediterranean station, Aug. 29th, 1833.