OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Notes on the churches in the counties of Kent, Sussex, and Surrey/Kent/Explanation of arrangement

EXPLANATION.
The first column of the List contains the Modern Names of places; the second the corresponding names, extracted from Domesday Book; and when any place appears among the latter only, the reason is, not that in every case no modern appellation is known; though in some instances that may be the fact; but that the church, formerly standing there, has been desecrated, and the site is no longer, if indeed it ever was, recognised as a distinct parish or chapelry. In the third column are given the churches mentioned in Domesday Book. The fourth, headed (A.D. 1291,) refers to the Taxation of Pope Nicholas the Fourth, ("Taxatio Eccles$^a$. Angliæ et Walliæ, auctoritate P. Nicolai 4, circa A.D. 1291"), and the asterisk in this column opposite to any name, indicates the church of that place to be noticed in the Taxation; which is conclusive evidence of the existence there of a church or chapel at that period, though the omission of such notice does not necessarily prove that no such building had yet been erected at the spot. Sometimes the church is not actually specified, but a vicar is; which last however always implies the presence of a church, the office having originated from the appropriation of churches and their emoluments to the support of monasteries; after which proceeding the latter were bound to find persons to perform the religious services of those churches, which persons were in consequence termed "Vicarii," or "substitutes" for the extinct rectors.
In describing the architectural characters of the buildings noticed, the terms employed are those suggested by the late Mr. Rickman; according to which definitions the Norman style ​may be stated generally to have prevailed till about A.D. 1200; the Early English may be called the style of the thirteenth century; the Decorated to have been adopted during the larger portion of the fourteenth; the last style, namely, the Perpendicular, having been introduced toward the conclusion of the fourteenth century, became that of the fifteenth, but, though practised so late as A.D. 1640, and even subsequently, it had already greatly declined from its perfection. (Gloss. of Architect.)
In the following Notes,
| The abbreviation . . | Norm., stands for | Norm., stands for | Norman. |
| " | Tr. Norm. | " | Transition Norman, intermediate between the first and second styles. |
| " | E. E. | " | Early English. |
| " | Dec. | " | Decorated. |
| " | Perp. | " | Perpendicular. |
For the same reason, namely, the sake of brevity, the references to Domesday Book are not given at full length, but short, as (D.B.) A similar rule is observed with regard to other works, which are frequently cited, the entire titles being named on the first occasion, but contractions afterwards employed. All works cited are invariably placed between parentheses.
# Notes on the churches in the counties of Kent, Sussex, and Surrey/Kent/Comparative List of the Churches

See Explanation of arrangement
LIST OF CHURCHES IN KENT.
# Notes on the churches in the counties of Kent, Sussex, and Surrey

* related portals: England.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
N O T E S
ON
T H E C H U R C H E S
IN THE COUNTIES OF
Kent, Sussex, and Surrey,
MENTIONED IN DOMESDAY BOOK,
AND THOSE OF MORE RECENT DATE.
INCLUDING
COMPARATIVE LISTS OF THE CHURCHES,
AND SOME ACCOUNT OF
The Sepulchral Memorials and other Antiquities.
BY
THE REV. ARTHUR HUSSEY, M.A.
LONDON:
JOHN RUSSELL SMITH,
36, SOHO SQUARE.
MDCCCLII.
LONDON: PRINTED BY E. Tucker, Frith Street, Soho.
CONTENTS. :
| | page |
| Preface | iii |
| KENT. ||
| Introduction | 1 |
| Explanation of the arrangement in the Comparative List, Abbreviations, &c. | 5 |
| Comparative List of the Churches | 7 |
| Notes on the Churches | 19 |
| Addenda | 170 |
| SUSSEX. ||
| Introduction | 171 |
| Comparative List of the Churches | 174 |
| Notes on the Churches | 183 |
| Addenda | 310 |
| SURREY. ||
| Introduction | 313 |
| Comparative List of the Churches | 313 |
| Notes on the Churches | 318 |
| Addenda | |
| General Index | 347 |
| Supplement | 365 |
| Kent | 365 |
| Sussex | 372 |
| Surrey | 380 |
| Index to Supplement | 381 |
| List of Subscribers | 383 |
LIST OF ENGRAVINGS. :
| | page |
| Allington Church | 20 |
| Boughton Malherb Church | 36 |
| East Farleigh Church | 67 |
| Hawkhurst Church | 76 |
| Niche in Leybourne Church | 92 |
| Font in Rolvenden Church | 143 |
| Seal of the Grammar School, Sevenoaks | 148 |
| Roman Altar at Stone in the Isle of Oxney | 154 |
| Tenterden Church | 158 |
| Woldham Church | 166 |
| Bodiam Church | 201 |
| Piscina in West Bourne Church | 205 |
| Font in Brighton Church | 206 |
| Chidingly Church | 213 |
| Doorway, Etchingham Church | 224 |
| East Hoathly Church — Remains of West Blatchington Church | 239 |
| Northiam Church | 261 |
| Wigsell, Salehurst | 282 |
| Compton Church | 324 |
| Brass in Cranley Church | 325 |
| Reredos in St Mary's Church, Guildford — North Transept of the Old Church, Dorking | 331 |
| Font in Shere Church | 341 |
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Notes on the churches in the counties of Kent, Sussex, and Surrey/Kent/Addenda

ADDENDA TO KENT.
A charter of 12 of K. Richard II names the churches of Leuche, Gore, and Parroke in Kent. (Monast. V, 717, 719.) What places may be signified I cannot imagine, except that I should conjecture Leuche to mean Lee; and that Parroke possibly refers to some spot in or adjoining the small portion of Kent lying on the Essex side of the Thames.
The rectory of Salmyston in the Isle of Thanet is mentioned as belonging to St. Augustin's, Canterbury, temp. K. Henry VIII. (Monast. I, 149.) This name I am unable to identify.
# Notes on the churches in the counties of Kent, Sussex, and Surrey/General Index

Some references on this page use a superscript $^1$, this is due to a duplication of page numbering 347 to 349 within the work, and the references are to the former set of pages in the Addenda.
* Top
* A
* B
* C
* D
* E
* F
* G
* H
* I
* J
* K
* L
* M
* N
* O
* P
* Q
* R
* S
* T
* U
* V
* W
* X
* Y
* Z
INDEX.
Arliss and Tucker, Printers, 15, Frith Street, Soho Square.
# O'Malley v. Woodrough

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
307 U.S. 277
O'Malley v. Woodrough
Argued: April 28, 1939. ---
Messrs. Frank Murphy, Atty. Gen., and Robert H. Jackson, Sol. Gen., for appellant.
Messrs. J. A. C. Kennedy and George L. DeLacy, both of Omaha, Neb., for appellees.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon/Dissent Minton

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Minton
United States Supreme Court
340 U.S. 504
O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon
Argued: Dec. 7, 1950. --- Decided: Feb 26, 1951
Mr. Justice MINTON, with whom Mr. Justice JACKSON and Mr. Justice BURTON join, dissenting.
Liability accrues in the instant case only if the death arose out of and in the course of the employment. This is a statutory provision common to all Workmen's Compensation Acts. There must be more than death and the relationship of employee and employer. There must be some connection between the death and the employment. Not in any common-law sense of causal connection but in the common-sense, everyday, realistic view. The Deputy Commissioner knew that, so he found as a fact that 'at the time of his drowning and death the deceased was using the recreational facilities sponsored and made available by the employer for the use of its employees and such participation by the deceased was an incident of his employment * * *.' This finding is false and has no scintilla of evidence or inference to support it.
I am unable to understand how this Court can say this is a fact based upon evidence. It is undisputed upon this record that the deceased, at the time he met his death, was outside the recreational area in the performance of a voluntary act of attempted rescue of someone unknown to the record. There can be no inference of liability here unless liability follows from the mere relationship of employer and employee. The attempt to rescue was an isolated, voluntary act of bravery of the deceased in no manner arising out of or in the course of his employment. The only relation his employment had with the attempted rescue and the following death was that his employment put him on the Island of Guam.
I suppose the way to avoid what we said today in Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra, is to find facts where there are no facts, on the whole record or any piece of it. It sounds a bit hollow to me for the Court, as it does, to quote from the New York case of Matter of Waters v. William J. Taylor Co., 218 N.Y. 248, 252, 112 N.E. 727, 728, L.R.A.1917A, 347, 'where an employee, even with the laudable purpose of helping another, might go so far from his employment and become so thoroughly disconnected from the service of his employer that it would be entirely unreasonable to say that injuries suffered by him arose out of and in the course of his employment.' This would seem to indicate that we are leaving some place for voluntary acts of the employees outside the course of their employment for which the employer may not be liable. There surely are such areas, but this case does not recognize them. The employer is liable in this case because he is an employer.
I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# O'Leary v. Kentucky

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 40
O'Leary v. Kentucky
Robert Allen Sedler, for appellants.
John B. Breckinridge, Atty. Gen. of Kentucky, and George F. Rabe, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# O'Leary v. Kentucky/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 40
O'Leary v. Kentucky
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# O'Neal v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
190 U.S. 36
O'Neal v. United States
Argued: May 4, 1903. --- Decided: June 1903
Mr. W. A. Blount for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Benjamin C. Tunison for defendant in error.
Mr. Chief Justice Fuller delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume III/Theodoret/Ecclesiastical History/Book II/Chapter 21

Chapter XXI.—Of the Second Council of Nicæa.
On receipt of these despatches Constantius wrote to the Antiochenes denying that he had committed the see of Antioch to Eudoxius, as Eudoxius had publicly announced. He ordered that Eudoxius be banished, and be punished for the course he had taken at the Bithynian Nicæa, where he had ordered the synod to assemble. Eudoxius himself had persuaded the officers entrusted with authority in the imperial household to fix Nicæa for the Council. But the Supreme Ruler and Governor, who knows the future like the past, stopped the assembly by a mighty earthquake, whereby the greater part of the city was overthrown, and most of the inhabitants destroyed. On learning this the assembled bishops were seized with panic, and returned to their own churches. But I regard this as a contrivance of the divine wisdom, for in that city the doctrine of the faith of the apostles had been defined by the holy Fathers. In that same city the bishops who were assembling on this later occasion were intending to lay down the contrary. The sameness of name would have been sure to furnish a means of deception to the Arian crew, and trick unsophisticated souls. They meant to call the council “the Nicene,” and identify it with the famous council of old. But He who has care for the churches disbanded the synod.
# Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series II/Volume III/Theodoret/Ecclesiastical History/Book II/Chapter 20

Chapter XX.—Concerning the innovations of Eudoxius, of Germanicia, and the zeal of Basilius of Ancyra, and of Eustathius of Sebasteia against him.
Germanicia is a city on the coasts of Cilicia, Syria, and Cappadocia, and belongs to the province called Euphratisia. Eudoxius, the head of its church, directly he heard of the death of Leontius, betook himself to Antioch and clutched the see, where he ravaged the vineyard of the Lord like a wild boar. He did not even attempt to hide his evil ways, like Leontius, but raged in direct attack upon the apostolic decrees, and involved in various troubles all who had the hardihood to gainsay him. Now at this time Basilius had succeeded Marcellus, and held the helm of the church of Ancyra, the capital of Galatia, and Sebastia, the chief city of Armenia, was under the guidance of Eustathius. No sooner had these bishops heard of the iniquity and madness of Eudoxius, than they wrote to inform the Emperor Constantius of his audacity. Constantius was now still tarrying in the west, and, after the death of the tyrants, was endeavouring to heal the harm they had caused. Both bishops were well known to the Emperor and had great influence with him on account of the high character they bore.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Eudoxius, eighth bishop of Constantinople, and formerly of Germanicia (Γερμανικεια, now Marash, or Banicia), was one of the most violent of the Arians. He was originally refused ordination by St. Eustathius, but on the deposition of that bishop in 331 the Eusebians pushed him forward. After ruling at Germanicia for some seventeen years he intruded himself on the see of Antioch. Under the patronage of the Acacians he became patriarch of Constantinople in 360, and died in 370.
* ↑ Basilius, a learned physician, a Semiarian of Ancyra, was made bishop of that see on the deposition of Marcellus, in 336, and excommunicated at Sardica in 347. In 350 he was reinstated at the command of Constantius. He was again exiled under Acacian influence, failed to get restitution from Jovian, and probably died in exile. (Soc. ii, 20, 26, iv, 24.) Vide also Theod. ii, 23. His works are lost. Athanasius praises him as among those who were (de Synod. 603 ed. Migne) “not far from accepting the Homousion.”
* ↑ Eustathius was bishop of Sebasteia or Sebaste (Siwas) on the Halys, from 357 to 380. Basil, Ep. 244, §9, says that he was a heretic “black who could not turn white”; but he exhibited many shades of theological colour, preserving through all vicissitudes a high personal character, and a something “more than human.” Basil Ep. 212, §2. Ordained by Eulalius, he was degraded because he insisted on wearing very unclerical costume. (Soc. ii, 43.) The question of the identity of this Eustathius with the Eustathius condemned at the Council of Ancyra is discussed in the Dict. Christ. Ant. i, 709.
# O Leeze me on my Spinning Wheel

* "O Leeze Me On My Spinning Wheel", in The Irish Wedding (n.d.), a chapbook printed in Edinburgh
* "Bess and her Wheel", in The Book of Scottish Song (1843), edited by Alexander Whitelaw
# O Lady of the Dazzling Flowers

First published in The Bookfellow, 15 February 1914
O, lady of the dazzling flowers, And the frock so white and fine, How hopeless is thy prettiness, And that cool heart of thine!
Thou hast not been to the rude field Where men and women war; Thou hast not found what a woman's mouth And a man's full heart are for.
Thy speech is all of a thin calm, Of sleep and slow sunshine; Oh, hopeless is thy happiness, And that pale heart of thine.
Through the love-feud and the love-thirst Thou hast not fought and smiled; Thou hast not heard the strings that speak In the crying of a child.
Thou hast not been where tears lie hot, And words can only run, Thou hast not cried to the bare night, Nor prayed for the white sun.
This work is in the public domain in Australia because it was created in Australia and the term of copyright has expired. According to Australian Copyright Council - Duration of Copyright, the following works are public domain:
* published non-government works whose author died before January 1, 1955,
* anonymous or pseudonymous works and photographs published before January 1, 1955, and
* government works published more than 50 years ago (before January 1, 1974).
This work is also in the public domain in the United States because it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days), and it was first published before 1989 without complying with U.S. copyright formalities (renewal and/or copyright notice) and it was in the public domain in Australia on the URAA date (January 1, 1996). This is the combined effect of Australia having joined the Berne Convention in 1928, and of 17 USC 104A with its critical date of January 1, 1996.
Because the Australian copyright term in 1996 was 50 years, the critical date for copyright in the United States under the URAA is January 1, 1946.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1942, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 81 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# O Love Divine, What Hast Thou Done

O Love divine, what has thou done! The immortal God hath died for me! The Father's coeternal Son bore all my sins upon the tree. Th' immortal God for me hath died: My Lord, my Love, is crucified!
Is crucified for me and you, to bring us rebels back to God. Believe, believe the record true, ye all are bought with Jesus' blood. Pardon for all flows from his side: My Lord, my Love, is crucified!
Behold him, all ye that pass by, the bleeding Prince of life and peace! Come, sinners, see your Savior die, and say, "Was ever grief like his?" Come, feel with me his blood applied: My Lord, my Love, is crucified!
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# O Little Town of Bethlehem

* related portals: Hymns, Christmas.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
In the United States, this hymn is commonly sung to the original tune "St. Louis" by Lewis Henry Redner; in the UK the preferred tune is "Forest Green" by Ralph Vaughan Williams, adapted from the English folk song "The Ploughboy's Dream".
* "O Little Town of Bethlehem" in The Army and Navy Hymnal, 1920
* "O Little Town of Bethlehem" in Our American Holidays - Christmas, 1949
# O Lord of perfect purity

Also known as Evening Hymn, this translation of the Latin hymn Coeli Deus sanctissime was first published in Caswall's Lyra Catholica, 1849.
* "Evening Hymn" in Catholic Hymns (1st ed.), 1853.
* "Evening Hymn" in Catholic Hymns (2nd ed.), 1860.
# O Lord, our languid souls inspire

On opening a place for social prayer by John Newton
    O Lord, our languid souls inspire,
    For here, we trust, thou art!
    Send down a coal of heav’nly fire,
    To warm each waiting heart.
    Dear Shepherd of Thy people, hear;
    Thy presence now display;
    As Thou hast given a place for prayer,
    So give us hearts to pray.
    Show us some token of Thy love,
    Our fainting hope to raise;
    And pour Thy blessings from above,
    That we may render praise.
    Within these walls let holy peace
    And love and concord dwell;
    Here give the troubled conscience ease,
    The wounded spirit heal.
    The feeling heart, the melting eye,
    The humble mind bestow;
    And shine upon us from on high,
    To make our graces grow!
    May we in faith receive Thy Word,
    In faith present our prayers;
    And, in the presence of our Lord,
    Unbosom all our cares.
    And may the Gospel’s joyful sound
    Enforced by mighty grace,
    Awaken many sinners round,
    To come and fill the place.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# O Lord, thou lovèdst me, ere shone the light

As published in Issue 1677 of Littell's Living Age (July 29, 1876)
(FROM THE FRENCH OF FRED. CHAVANNES.) "Tu m'as aimé, seigneur, avant que la lumiere."
* O Lord, thou lovèdst me, ere shone the light
* Upon the worlds thy voice had called to be;
* Ere yet the sun, rejoicing in his might,
* Shed life in floods athwart their orbits bright;
* My God, thou lovèdst me.
* Thou lovèdst me, when hung the lifeless frame
* Of Jesus Christ upon th' accursèd tree;
* When to redeem me from th' eternal flame
* Thy holy Son endured my sin and blame;
* My God, thou lovèdst me.
* Thou lovèdst me, when fires of love divine,
* Lit in my heart by Thy good Spirit free;
* Opened new heavens upon my soul to shine;
* When peaceful fruits of righteousness were mine;
* My God, thou lovèdst me.
* And thou wilt love me, — whom thy love hath crowned
* Nor sin, nor earth, nor hell shall pluck from thee;
* Where sin abounded, grace doth more abound;
* Only my love to thine be answering found,
* O thou, who lovèdst me!
# O Love That Will Not Let Me Go

"Dr. Matheson says this hymn was 'written in the Manse of my former parish (Innellan, Argyleshire) one summer evening in 1882. It was composed with extreme rapidity; it seemed to me that its construction occupied only a few minutes, and I felt myself rather in the position of one who was being dictated to than of an original artist I was suffering from extreme mental distress, and the hymn was the fruit of pain.' [L. MSS.] This hymn first appeared in the Church of Scotland magazine, Life and Work, in 1883. From thence it passed into the Scottish Hymnal 1884; and there set to special music by Dr. A. L. Peace. It is a beautiful and tender hymn and worthy of extensive use." —"O Love that wilt not let me go," in A Dictionary of Hymnology, (ed.) by John Julian (1892).
* "O, Love That Will Not Let Me Go" in The Canadian Soldiers' Song Book (1918).
* "O Love That Will Not Let Me Go" in The Army and Navy Hymnal (ed.) by Henry Augustine Smith (1920).
# O Lapwing, thou fliest around the heath

From Blake’s Notebook (c.1793), p. 113 reversed. See also: Songs and Ballads.
O Lapwing, thou fliest around the heath Nor seest the net that is spread beneath. Why dost thou not fly among the corn fields? They cannot spread nets where a harvest yields.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse