OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# H.R. 3200/Division B/Title I/Subtitle B
## SUBTITLE B — PROVISIONS RELATED TO PART B

    Part 1—Physicians' Services
       Sec. 1121. Sustainable Growth Rate Reform.
       Sec. 1122. Misvalued Codes Under the Physician Fee Schedule.
       Sec. 1123. Payments for Efficient Areas.
       Sec. 1124. Modifications to the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI).
       Sec. 1125. Adjustment to Medicare Payment Localities.
    Part 2—Market Basket Updates
       Sec. 1131. Incorporating Productivity Improvements Into Market Basket Updates That Do Not Already Incorporate Such Improvements.
    Part 3—Other Provisions
       Sec. 1141. Rental and Purchase of Power-Driven Wheelchairs.
       Sec. 1142. Extension of Payment Rule for Brachytherapy.
       Sec. 1143. Home Infusion Therapy Report to Ccongress.
       Sec. 1144. Require Ambulatory Surgical Centers (ASCs) to Submit Cost Data and Other Data.
       Sec. 1145. Treatment of Certain Cancer Hospitals.
       Sec. 1146. Medicare Improvement Fund.
       Sec. 1147. Payment for Imaging Services.
       Sec. 1148. Durable Medical Equipment Program Improvements.
       Sec. 1149. MedPAC Study and Report on Bone Mass Measurement.
# Hodge v. Iowa/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
368 U.S. 402
Hodge v. Iowa
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is of the opinion certiorari should be granted.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hodge v. Kentucky

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Sotomayor
Cite as: 568 U. S. ____ (2012)
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
BENNY LEE HODGE v. KENTUCKY
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
| | The current edition of this document derives from the electronic version of the "slip opinion" posted online by the Supreme Court of the United States the day the decision was handed down. It is not the final or most authoritative version. It is subject to further revision by the Court and should be replaced with the final edition when it is published in a print volume of the United States Reports. The Court's full disclaimer regarding slip opinions follows: |
| The "slip" opinion is the second version of an opinion. It is sent to the printer later in the day on which the "bench" opinion is released by the Court. Each slip opinion has the same elements as the bench opinion—majority or plurality opinion, concurrences or dissents, and a prefatory syllabus—but may contain corrections not appearing in the bench opinion. Caution: These electronic opinions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official printed slip opinion pamphlets. Moreover, a slip opinion is replaced within a few months by a paginated version of the case in the preliminary print, and—one year after the issuance of that print—by the final version of the case in a U. S. Reports bound volume. In case of discrepancies between the print and electronic versions of a slip opinion, the print version controls. In case of discrepancies between the slip opinion and any later official version of the opinion, the later version controls. (source: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinions.aspx) ||
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hodges v. Colcord

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
193 U.S. 192
Hodges v. Colcord
Argued: February 23, 1904. --- Decided: March 7, 1904
Mr. J. S. Jenkins for appellants.
Messrs. John W. Shartel, James R. Keaton, and Frank Wells for appellees.
Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hodges v. Snyder

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
261 U.S. 600
Hodges v. Snyder
Submitted on Motion to Dismiss or Affirm Feb. 26, 1923.
Decided April 9, 1923.
Mr. Samuel Herrick, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Max Royhl and T. H. Null, both of Huron, S. D., for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice SANFORD delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hodge v. Muscatine County

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
196 U.S. 276
Hodge v. Muscatine County
Argued: December 9, 12, 1904. --- Decided: January 16, 1905
This was a petition in the district court by the owner and tenant of certain real estate in Muscatine, used for a tobacconist's shop, to enjoin the defendants from assessing, and collecting a tax of $240, upon the ground of the unconstitutionality of the law.
Demurrers were interposed to the petition and to certain amendments thereto, which were sustained, the bill dismissed, and an appeal taken to the supreme court of Iowa, which affirmed the judgment of the court below. 121 Iowa, 482, 96 N. W. 968.
Messrs. Junius Parker, W. W. Fuller, and Frank S. Dunshee for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Ed. P. Ingham and Henry Jayne for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice Brown delivered the opinion of the Court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Independent Wireless Telegraph Company v. Radio Corporation of America (270 U.S. 84)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
270 U.S. 84
Independent Wireless Telegraph Company v. Radio Corporation of America
Argued: March 1, 1926. ---
Mr. Wm. H. Davis, of New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In Other Words/Craving Your Attention

New York: Doubleday, Page & Company page vii
Layout 2
Craving Your Attention
Horace: Book I, Ode 32. “Poscimur. Si quid vacui sub umbra—” AD LYRAM
# Historic Highways of America/Volume 14/Title

The Great American Canals
Volume II
The Erie Canal
Layout 2
# Historic Highways of America/Volume 14/Preface

PREFACE
THIS second monograph on the great American canals which played the part of important highways westward, is devoted to an outline of the Erie Canal. In the comparatively short space at our disposal for so great a theme, it has been possible only to sketch some of the leading features of our subject, namely, the early history of the Mohawk Valley route, the origin of the canal idea, its building, the celebration of its completion, a catalogue of its finances and enlargements, and its effect.
Our sources have been the state Reports, Sweet's Documentary History, Hawley's Origin of the Erie Canal, and the various state and local histories which treat of the subject. A monograph, in the form of a thesis, by Julius Winden, has been of great advantage, as will be indicated, in presenting the influence of the Erie Canal upon the population along its course.
​The author is under a debt of gratitude to Hon. A. R. Spofford of the Congressional Library, Hon. John S. Billings of the New York Public Library, and T. M. Ripley of Marietta, Ohio, for advice and assistance.
A. B. H.
Marietta, Ohio, March 4, 1904.
Layout 2
# Historic Highways of America/Volume 15

HISTORIC HIGHWAYS OF AMERICA
VOLUME 15
General Roy Stone
[Father of the good-roads movement in the United States]
HISTORIC HIGHWAYS OF AMERICA VOLUME 15
The Future of Road-making in America
A Symposium
BY Archer Butler Hulbert
and others
With Illustrations
THE ARTHUR H. CLARK COMPANY CLEVELAND, OHIO 1905
COPYRIGHT, 1905 BY The Arthur H. Clark Company
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1933, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 90 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# How Chopin came to Remsen

Extracted from Smart Set magazine, 1901 December, pp. 1-27. For those who may be interested, there's more about Chopin's Opus 47 at Wikipedia
HOW CHOPIN CAME TO REMSEN
By Edward S. Van Zile
* I. Chopin's Opus 47
* II. Remsen Confronts a Mystery
* III. Biographical Data
* IV. Signorina Molatti
* V. A Polish Fantasia
* VI. Consulting a Specialist
* VII. A Preliminary Canter
* VIII. The Chopin Society
* IX. An Unrecorded Opus
* X. Tom's Recovery
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1931, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 92 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# How Can We Sinners Know

How can we sinners know our sins on earth forgiven? How can my gracious Savior show my name inscribed in heaven?
What we have felt and seen, with confidence we tell, and publish to the ends of earth the signs infallible.
We who in Christ believe that he for us hath died, we all his unknown peace receive and feel his blood applied.
We by his Spirit prove and know the things of God, the things which freely doth impart and signs us with his cross.
The meek and lowly heart that in our Savior was, to us that Spirit doth impart and signs us with his cross.
Our nature's turned, our mind transformed in all its powers, and both the witnesses are joined, the Spirit of God with ours.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Inspection

This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
'You! What d'you mean by this?' I rapped. 'You dare come on parade like this?' 'Please, sir, it's-' 'Old yer mouth,' the sergeant snapped. 'I takes 'is name, sir?'-'Please, and then dismiss.'
Some days 'confined to camp' he got, For being 'dirty on parade'. He told me, afterwards, the damnèd spot Was blood, his own. 'Well, blood is dirt,' I said.
'Blood's dirt,' he laughed, looking away, Far off to where his wound had bled And almost merged for ever into clay. 'The world is washing out its stains,' he said. 'It doesn't like our cheeks so red: Young blood's its great objection. But when we're duly white-washed, being dead, The race will bear Field-Marshal God's inspection.'
# Inspiration

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Inspiration."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Inspiration", a poem by Paul Laurence Dunbar (At the golden gate of song)
* "Inspiration", a poem by Hilda Mary Hooke (A moment when the world is sunk in space)
* "Inspiration", a poem by Henry David Thoreau (If thou wilt but stand by my ear)
* "Inspiration", a poem by Henry David Thoreau (Whate'er we leave to God, God does)
* "Inspiration", a poem by H. P. Lovecraft (One fragrant morn, when Spring was young)
# In re Gregory

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
219 U.S. 210
In re Gregory
Argued: December 5, 1910. --- Decided: January 3, 1911
Messrs. John Hall Jones and W. Benton Crisp for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from page 211 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Edward H. Thomas, William Henry White, and Francis H. Stephens for respondent.
Mr. Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re Green (369 U.S. 689)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
369 U.S. 689
In re Green (369 U.S. 689)
Argued: April 9, 1962. --- Decided: May 21, 1962
Merritt W. Green, Toledo, Ohio, for petitioner.
Ben Neidlinger, Toledo, Ohio, for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re Gilbert (276 U.S. 6)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
276 U.S. 6
In re Gilbert
Argued: Jan. 16, 1928. --- Decided: Jan 23, 1928
Mr. James M. Beck, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT announced the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re Grand Jury (US 2023)

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 21–1397
IN RE GRAND JURY ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT [January 23, 2023]
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re Green

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
141 U.S. 325
In re Green
B. W. Perkins, for the motion.
FIELD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# History of England

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "History of England."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* The History of England, a work by Jane Austen
* Cassell's Illustrated History of England, by John Cassell
* A Short History of England, by G. K. Chesterton
* Every Child's History of England from the Earliest Period to the Present Time by Julia Corner
* History of England, by Laurence Echard
* History of England, by Charles Robert Leslie Fletcher, with poems composed by Rudyard Kipling
* History of England from the Fall of Wolsey to the Defeat of the Spanish Armada by James Anthony Froude
* History of England, by Samuel Rawson Gardiner
* An History of England, in a Series of Letters from a Nobleman to His Son by Oliver Goldsmith
* History of England, by Robert Henry
* The History of England, by David Hume
* The History of England from the Accession of James II by Thomas Babington Macaulay
* History of England, by Lord Mahon
* The History of Britain, that Part especially now called England; from the first traditional Beginning, continued to the Norman Conquest. Collected out of the antientest and best Authours thereof, by John Milton
* History of England, by Paul de Rapin-Thoyras
* History of England, by Tobias George Smollett
* History of England, by Philip Henry Stanhope
* History of England, by Sharon Turner
# History of England (Froude)

* related portals: Tudor England.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
12 volumes
HISTORY OF ENGLAND
FROM
THE FALL OF WOLSEY
TO
THE DEFEAT OF THE SPANISH ARMADA.
BY
JAMES ANTHONY FROUDE, M.A.
REGIUS PROFESSOR OF MODERN HISTORY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD.
VOLUME I. HENRY THE EIGHTH.
New Edition
LONDON:
LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO.
1893.
Preface Table of Contents
Volume I. Chapter I. Social condition of England in the Sixteenth Century Chapter II. The Last Years of the Administration of Wolsey Chapter III. The Parliament of 1529 Chapter IV. Church and State Chapter V. Marriage of Henry and Anne Boleyn Chapter VI. The Protestants
Volume II. Chapter VII. The Last Efforts of Diplomacy Chapter VIII. The Irish Rebellion Chapter IX. The Catholic Martyrs Chapter X. The Visitation of the Monasteries Chapter XI. The Trial and Death of Anne Boleyn. Chapter XII. Foreign and Domestic Aspects of the Reformation in England Chapter XIII. The Pilgrimage of Grace
Volume III. Chapter XIV. The Commission of Cardinal Pole Chapter XV. The Exeter Conspiracy Chapter XVI. The Six Articles Chapter XVII. Anne of Cleves and the Fall of Cromwell Chapter XVIII. Scotland and Ireland Chapter XIX. Solway Moss Chapter XX. The French War
Volume IV. Chapter XXI. The Peace of Crepy Chapter XXII. The Invasion Chapter XXIII. The Death of Henry VIII. Chapter XXIV. The Protectorate Chapter XXV. The Protectorate Chapter XXVI. The Fall of the Protector Chapter XXVII. The Reformed Administration
Volume V. Chapter XXVIII. Execution of the Duke of Somerset Chapter XXIX. Northumberland's Conspiracy Chapter XXX. Queen Jane and Queen Mary Chapter XXXI. The Spanish Marriage Chapter XXXII. Reconciliation with Rome Chapter XXXIII. The Martyrs
Volume VI.
Volume VII. Chapter XLI. The English at Havre Chapter XLII. Shan O'Neil Chapter XLIII. The Embassy of de Silva Chapter XLIV. The Darnley Marriage Chapter XLV. The Murder of Darnley Chapter XLVI. The Death of O'Neill
Volume VIII. Chapter XLVII. England on the Sea Chapter XLVIII. Carberry Hill Chapter XLIX. Lochleven Castle Chapter L. Flight of Mary Stuart to England Chapter LI. The Casket Letters
Volume IX. Chapter LII. English Parties Chapter LIII. The Rising of the North Chapter LIV. Excommunication of Elizabeth Chapter LV. The Ridolfi Conspiracy Chapter LVI. The Ridolfi Conspiracy
Volume X. Chapter LVII. The Duke of Norfolk Chapter LVIII. The Massacre of St Bartholomew Chapter LIX. State of Ireland Chapter LX. The Spanish Treaty Chapter LXI. The Alençon Marriage Chapter LXII. The Desmond Rebellion
Volume XI. Chapter LXIII. The Jesuit Invasion Chapter LXV. The Jesuits in Scotland Chapter LXVI. The Expulsion of Mendoza Chapter LXVII. The Bond of Association
Volume XII.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# History of Mexico (Bancroft)/Volume 3

HISTORY
OF
MEXICO
BY
HUBERT HOWE BANCROFT
VOLUME III.
NEW YORK THE BANCROFT COMPANY
# In Re Michael Sindram

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinions

    Marshall
    Blackmun
United States Supreme Court
498 U.S. 177
In Re Michael Sindram
No. 90-6051
See 498 U.S. 1116, 111 S.Ct. 1029.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In Re Michael Sindram/Dissent Blackmun

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Marshall Blackmun
Justice BLACKMUN, with whom Justice MARSHALL joins, dissenting.
I join Justice MARSHALL's dissent. I write separately simply to emphasize what seems to me to be the inappropriateness of the Court's action in this particular case. Even if one believes, as I do not, that this Court has the authority prospectively to deny leave for a litigant to proceed in forma pauperis, and in some instances may be justified in doing so, I cannot conclude that such action is warranted in this case. Jessie McDonald, the first pro se litigant to whom this Court has barred its doors prospectively, had filed 19 petitions for extraordinary relief when the Court concluded that he had abused the privilege of filing in forma pauperis. See In re McDonald, 489 U.S. 180, 181, and n. 3, 109 S.Ct. 993, 994, and n. 3, 103 L.Ed.2d 158 (1989). See also Wrenn v. Benson, 490 U.S. 89, 109 S.Ct. 1629, 104 L.Ed.2d 80 (1989). As the Court today acknowledges, however, Michael Sindram has filed only two petitions for extraordinary relief since 1987: a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in 1988 and the pending petition for mandamus. Ante, at 178, and n. 1.
While it may well be true that each of Sindram's petitions for extraordinary relief lacked merit, it cannot be, as the Court asserts, that these two petitions have "compromise[d]" the "goal of fairly dispensing justice," or "disrupt[ed] the fair allocation of judicial resources." Ante, at 179-180. Rather, the Court's order in this case appears to be nothing more than an alternative for punishing Sindram for the frequency with which he has filed petitions for certiorari and petitions for rehearing. Ante, at 177-178. Accordingly, I dissent.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In Re James Blodgett

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Stevens
United States Supreme Court
502 U.S. 236
In Re James Blodgett
No. 91-716
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re Louisville Underwriters

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
134 U.S. 488
In re Louisville Underwriters
J. R. Beckwith, for petitioner.
O. B. Sansum, for respondent.
GRAY, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse