OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/5th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 1

Chapter Ⅰ.—An Act to prevent citizens of the United States from Privateering against nations in amity with, or against citizens of the United States.
Repealed by Act of April 20, 1818, ch. 83, sec. 12.Citizens fitting out ships, or concerned therein, how pnnished and fined. 1794, ch. 50.Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That if any citizen or citizens of the United States shall, without the limits of the same, fit out and arm, or attempt to fit out and arm, or procure to be fitted out and armed, or shall knowingly aid or be concerned in the furnishing, fitting out or arming any private ship or vessel of war, with intent that such ship or vessel shall be employed to cruise or commit hostilities, upon the subjects, citizens or property of any prince or state with whom the United States are at peace, or upon the citizens of the United States, or their property, or shall take the command of, or enter on board of any such ship or vessel for the intent aforesaid, or shall purchase an interest in any vessel so fitted out and armed, with a view to share in the profits thereof, such person or persons so offending shall, on conviction thereof, be adjudged guilty of a high misdemeanor, and shall be punished by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars, and imprisonment not exceeding ten years: And the trial for such offence, if committed without the limits of the United States, shall be in the district where the offender shall be apprehended or first brought.
Construction of this act.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That nothing in the foregoing act shall be construed to prevent the prosecution or punishment of treason, or any piracy defined by a treaty or other law of the United States.
Approved, June 14, 1797.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/5th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 10

Chap. Ⅹ.—An Act to continue in force to the end of the next session, certain acts, and parts of acts, of limited duration.
Certain laws declared in force till the end of next session.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That all laws of the United States, and parts of laws now in force, and which, by the terms of their limitation, will expire with the end of this session of Congress, shall be, and hereby are continued in force, until the end of the next session.
Approved, July 5, 1797.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/4th Congress/2nd Session/Resolution 1

Ⅰ. Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,President to call on certain states respecting an amendment to the Constitution. That the President be requested to adopt some speedy and effectual means of obtaining information from the states of Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee and South Carolina, whether they have ratified the amendment proposed by Congress to the Constitution concerning the suability of states; if they have, to obtain the proper evidences thereof.
Approved, March 2, 1797.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/5th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 12

Chap. Ⅻ.—An Act in addition to the law of the United States, concerning Consuls and Vice Consuls.
Consul at Algiers. Act of April 14, 1792.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That in case it be found necessary, for the interest of the United States that a Consul be appointed to reside at Algiers; the President be authorized to allow him an annual salary not exceeding four thousand dollars.
Approved, July 6, 1797.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/5th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 13

Chap. ⅩⅢ.—An Act for allowing full mileage to the members of the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That at the present extraordinary meeting and session of Congress, the respective members Ante, p. 448. of the Senate and of the House of Representatives shall be entitled to receive a full allowance of mileage, any law to the contrary notwithstanding.
Approved, July 6, 1797.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/4th Congress/2nd Session/Resolution 2

Ⅱ. Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Mode of distributing laws of United States. That the five hundred copies of the laws of the United States, directed to be printed by the act, intituled “An act for the more general promulgation of the laws of the United States,” and which were, by the said act, reserved for the future disposition of Congress, shall be distributed by the Secretary of State, in the manner following: One set shall be delivered to George Washington, now President of the United States; to the President of the United States; to the Vice President of the United States, and to each of the members of the Senate and House of Representatives; six sets shall be delivered to the Secretary of the Senate, and twelve sets to the clerk of the House of Representatives; one set shall be delivered to each of the Judges of the Supreme Court; to each of the Judges of the District Courts; and to each of the Marshals and Attornies of each district; one set shall be delivered to the Secretary of State; to the Secretary of the Treasury; to the Secretary of War; to the Attorney General; to the Director of the Mint; to the Comptroller of the Treasury; to the Commissioner of the Revenue; to the Register; to the Auditor; to the Accountant of the War Department, and to the Postmaster General, and the Purveyor of Public Supplies; one set shall be delivered to the Governor and to the Secretary of the Territory northwest of the Ohio, and to each of the Judges thereof; one set shall be delivered to each Collector, Naval Officer and Surveyor, and to each Supervisor and Inspector of the Revenue, in the United States.
Sec 1. And be it further resolved, That in case of the death, resignation, or dismission from office, of either of the officers before mentioned, excepting the President and Vice President of the United States, the members of the Senate and House of Representatives, and the Judges of the Supreme and District Courts, the said copies of the laws of the United States, delivered to them as aforesaid, shall belong to their respective successors in the said offices.
Approved, March 3, 1797.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/5th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 14

Chap. ⅩⅣ.—An Act to revive and continue in force, for a limited time, an act, intituled “An act authorizing the transfer of stock standing to the credit of certain States.”
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the several provisions of the act, intituled “An act authorizing the transfer of the stock standing to the credit of certain states,”1795, ch. 10. passed the second day of January one thousand seven hundred and ninety-five, be and they are hereby revived and continued in force until the fourth day of March, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-nine, and no longer.
Approved, July 6, 1797.
# United States v. Chana/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
65 U.S. 131
United States v. Chana
The appellees presented their claim before the board of commissioners for the settlement of land claims in California for a tract of land, consisting of four leagues, on the south side of Bear creek, in Yuba county, under a grant to Theodore Sicard by Micheltorena, Governor of the Department of California.
The testimony to sustain the claim is similar to that offered in the cases of United States v. Nye, 21 How., 408, and United States v. Rose, 23 How., 262. In these cases it was determined that the testimony was not sufficient to support the claims. This case must follow the same course that was assumed in those.
Judgment of the District Court reversed, and petition dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water & Power Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
209 U.S. 447
United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water & Power Company
Argued: April 6, 7, 8, 1908. --- Decided: April 20, 1908
Attorney General Bonaparte, Solicitor General Hoyt, and Duane E. Fox for appellant.
Messrs. Arch. B. Eldredge, John H. Goff, and Moses Hooper for appellee.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc.

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, news, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
404 U.S. 548
United States v. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., et al.
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
No. 70-72 Argued: January 12, 1972 --- Decided: January 24, 1972
426 F. 2d 32, affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Deputy Solicitor General Friedman argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Harry R. Sachse, Howard E. Shapiro, and Harry G. Sklarsky.
John E.F. Wood argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief for Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., were Judson A. Parsons, Jr., J. Paul McGrath, Paul Sherman, and Arthur G. Connolly. Roy W. McDonald, Ralstone R. Irvine, and Richard Y. Holcomb filed a brief for respondent American Cyanamid Co. Merrell E. Clark, Jr., and Henry J. Zafian filed a brief for respondent Bristol-Myers Co.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Chana

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
65 U.S. 131
United States v. Chana
THIS was an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the northern district of California.
The claim was based upon Sutter's general title, which has been explained in some of the preceding volumes of these Reports.
It was submitted on printed argument by Mr. Black (Attorney General) for the United States, no counsel appearing for the appellees. It appears to have been confirmed by the court below before they knew the decision of this court with regard to Sutter's general title.
Mr. Justice CAMPBELL delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Chapfizer & Co/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
404 U.S. 548
UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. CHAS. PFIZER & CO., Inc., et al.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice STEWART, Mr. Justice WHITE, and Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Champlin Refining Company/Dissent Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Douglas Black
United States Supreme Court
341 U.S. 290
United States v. Champlin Refining Company
Argued: March 8, 9, 1951. --- Decided: May 7, 1951
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, with whom Mr. Justice REED and Mr. Justice BURTON concur, concurring in part and dissenting in part.
The term 'common carrier' has but one meaning in the Act-the meaning given it by § 1. That definition was held in Champlin Refining Co. v. United States, 329 U.S. 29, 67 S.Ct. 1, 91 L.Ed. 22, sufficiently broad to include appellee. Section 19a was involved there and § 6 is involved here. That may make a constitutional difference; but there can be none so far as the statute is concerned. Since § 6, like § 19a, can reach appellee only through § 1, if § 1 is broad enough for the one section it is broad enough for the other. As the Court in its several decisions has not been consistent in its interpretation of the scope of the Act as applied to private pipe lines, I feel free to follow the precedent of the Pipe-Line Cases, 234 U.S. 548, 561 562, 34 S.Ct. 956, 58 L.Ed. 1459, and the view expressed in the dissent in Champlin Refining Co. v. United States, 329 U.S. 29, 67 S.Ct. 1, 91 L.Ed. 22, that pipe lines carrying only the commodities of their owners from the owners' refineries to the owners' storage tanks for marketing have not been made by Congress subject to the Act. Consequently, I agree that § 1 is not broad enough to bring appellee under the regulatory power of the Interstate Commerce Commission. Therefore, neither § 6 nor § 20 applies.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Buffalo Natural Gas Fuel Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
172 U.S. 339
United States v. Buffalo Natural Gas Fuel Company
Asst. Atty. Gen. Hoyt, for the United States.
H. P. Bissell, for respondent.
Mr. Justice PECKHAM delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Buffalo Pitts Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
234 U.S. 228
United States v. Buffalo Pitts Company
Argued: May 15, 1914. --- Decided: June 8, 1914
Assistant Attorney General Underwood for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Edward Payson White for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Buchanan (232 U.S. 72)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
232 U.S. 72
United States v. Buchanan (232 U.S. 72)
Argued: December 3, 1913. --- Decided: January 5, 1914
The grand jury for the district of Colorado indicted Buchanan for a violation of the act 'to prevent unlawful occupancy of the public land.' The indictment charged that in February, 1907, one Edward Scott made a homestead entry, at the proper office, of a quarter section of land in Colorado, and died, March 28, 1910, leaving the homestead entry in full force and effect; that thereafter 'his heirs were in lawful possession of and were engaged in cultivating the said homestead land for the purpose of protecting their right as heirs to the same, until May 9, 1911, when the defendant, Buchanan, wilfully, wickedly, unlawfully, and feloniously did prevent and obstruct said heirs from peaceably entering upon and establishing a settlement and residence on the said homesteaded land of the United States subject to settlement and entry under the public land laws.' The defendant demurred on the ground that the facts charged did not constitute an offense punishable under § 3 of the act of February 25, 1885 (23 Stat. at L. 322, chap. 149, U.S.C.omp. Stat. 1901, p. 1525), which provides: 'Sec. 3. That no person, by force, threats, intimidation, or by any fencing or inclosing, or any other unlawful means, shall prevent or obstruct, . . . any person from peaceably entering upon or establishing a settlement or residence on any tract of public land subject to settlement or entry under the public land laws of the United States.'
The defendant's demurrer was sustained and the government brought the case here under the criminal appeals act.
Assistant Attorney General Knaebel and Mr. S. W. Williams for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. S. E. Naugle and C. W. Waterman for defendant in error.
Statement by Mr. Justice Lamar: Mr. Justice Lamar, after making the foregoing statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Buchanan (49 U.S. 83)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
49 U.S. 83
United States v. Buchanan

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/11th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 1

Chapter I.—An Act to authorize the transportation of certain Documents free of postage.
Certain documents to be free of postage.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the members of Congress, the secretary of the Senate, and the clerk of the House of Representatives, be, and they are hereby respectively authorized to transmit free of postage, the message of the President of the United States, of the twenty-ninth of November, one thousand eight hundred and nine, and the documents accompanying the same, printed by order of the Senate, and by order of the House of Representatives, to any post-office within the United States, and territories thereof, to which they may direct; any law to the contrary notwithstanding.
Approved, December 9, 1809.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/11th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 14

Chap. XIV.—An Act making appropriations for the support of the Navy of the United States, for the year one thousand eight hundred and ten.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That for defraying the expenses of the navy of the United States, during the year one thousand eight hundred and ten, the following sums be, and the same are hereby respectively appropriated, that is to say:
Specific appropriations.For the pay and subsistence of the officers, and pay of the seamen, seven hundred and eighteen thousand one hundred and fifteen dollars.
For provisions, three hundred and fifty-three thousand six hundred and ten dollars and eighty-four cents.
For medicines, instruments and hospital stores, sixteen thousand dollars.
For repairs of vessels, one hundred and fifty thousand dollars.
For freight, store rent, commissions to agents and other contingent expenses, seventy-five thousand dollars.
For pay and subsistence of the marine corps, including provisions for those on shore and forage for the staff, one hundred and forty thousand one hundred and twenty-one dollars and forty cents.
For clothing for the same, thirty-eight thousand three hundred and ninety-four dollars and seventy cents.
For military stores for the same, one thousand three hundred and ninety-eight dollars and seventy-five cents.
For medicines, medical services, hospital stores and all other expenses on account of the sick belonging to the marine corps, two thousand dollars.
For quartermasters and barrack-masters’ stores, officers’ travelling expenses, armorers and carpenters’ bills, fuel, premiums for enlisting, musical instruments, bounty to music, and other contingent expenses of the marine corps, fifteen thousand dollars.
​For the expenses of navy yards, comprising dock and other improvements, pay of superintendents, storekeepers, clerks and labourers, seventy-five thousand dollars.
For ordnance and small arms, seventy-five thousand dollars.
Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the several sums specifically appropriated by this act, shall be paid out of any monies in the treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, March 2, 1810.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/11th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 7

Chap. VII.—An Act to fix the time for the next meeting of Congress.
Congress to meet on the fourth Monday in Nov. 1809.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That after the adjournment of the present session, the next meeting of Congress shall be on the fourth Monday of November next.
Approved, June 24, 1809.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/11th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 5

Chap. V.—An Act to continue in force “An act declaring the assent of Congress to a certain acts of the state of South Carolina, passed the twenty-first of December, one thousand eight hundred and four.”
Act of March 28, 1806, ch. 17, continued in force for five years.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the act of the twenty-eighth of March, one thousand eight hundred and six, entituled “An act declaring the consent of Congress to an act of the state of South Carolina, passed on the twenty-first day of December, one thousand eight hundred and four, so far as the same relates to authorizing the city council of Charleston to impose and collect a duty on the tonnage of vessels from foreign ports,” be and the same is hereby continued in force from the passage of this act for five years, and thence to the end of the next session of Congress thereafter, and no longer.
Approved, June 15, 1809.