OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays

BERTRAND RUSSELL
MYSTICISM AND LOGIC
AND OTHER ESSAYS
LONDON
GEORGE ALLEN & UNWIN LTD
RUSKIN HOUSE MUSEUM STREET
* Preface
* Index
| First published as "Philosophical Essays" | October 1910 |
| Second Edition as "Mysticism and Logic | December 1917 |
| Third Impression | April 1918 |
| Fourth Impression | February 1919 |
| Fifth Impression | October 1921 |
| Sixth Impression | August 1925 |
| Seventh Impression | January 1932 |
| Eighth Impression | 1949 |
| Ninth Impression | 1950 |
| Tenth Impression | 1951 |
| Eleventh Impression | 1959 |
| This book is copyright under the Berne Convention. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, 1956, no portion may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Enquiry should be made to the publisher. ||
| PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN ||
| by Taylor Garnett Evans & Co. Ltd., Watford, Herts. ||
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1970, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 53 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Milwaukee Journal

* related portals: Newspapers.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
Daily newspaper based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, published between 1882 and 1995, when it was consolidated with the Milwaukee Sentinel.
Content exists for this periodical, though at this stage it is not specifically organised beyond a basic hierarchy.
The pages listed below are an automatically generated listing.
Special:PrefixIndex/Milwaukee Journal/
# Milwaukee Railroad v. Soutter and Knapp/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
72 U.S. 660
Milwaukee Railroad v. Soutter and Knapp
The decision of this question must depend upon the construction of the act of March 3d, 1863; for without that act it is very clear that the jurisdiction belonged to the Circuit Court. We have, on a former occasion, given a construction of that act from which we see no reason to depart. In the case, Bronson v. La Crosse Railroad Co., we held that the powers conferred by this act on the District Courts, were only such as were necessary to control the ministerial duties of officers in the execution of final powers; and that if other powers became necessary, recourse must be had to the Circuit Court.
The act of confirming or setting aside a sale made by a commissioner in chancery, often involves the exercise of judgment and discretion as delicate as that called for by any function which belongs to the court. In the case before us, over forty exceptions were taken to the marshal's report of the sale, by three different parties, who resisted its confirmation; and the court delivered an elaborate opinion on the matter involved in these exceptions, when they were under consideration on the first sale. This strongly illustrates the fact, that judicial judgment may be called into exercise by the action of the court.
In the case of Blossom v. The Railroad Co., we held that the confirmation or rejection of a sale under a chancery decree, required the exercise of such judicial discretion; and therefore an appeal could be taken to this court from such an order.
These principles must control the case before us. They lead to the conclusion that the action of the District Court complained of by appellants was without authority, and must be set aside; and that this case must be remanded to the Circuit Court, with directions to enter a rule against the marshal who made the sale, to report it to that court for further proceedings, not inconsistent with this opinion.
ORDER ACCORDINGLY.
At the same time with this appeal was heard an appeal, on the same record, by the opposite party, Soutter & Knapp, who were complainants in the court below. They had appealed from the original decree of foreclosure, on the ground that it did not include certain property which they were entitled to have sold under the mortgage. Upon the questions involved in that appeal, the members of the court who heard the argument-which was by the same counsel as the appeal by the other side, their positions only as respected appellant and appellee being reversed-were equally divided in opinion, and the decree and orders complained of were therefore affirmed.

## Notes

* ↑ The language of which is given above, in the statement of the case.-REP.
* ↑ 1 Wallace, 405.
* ↑ 1 Wallace, 655.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Milwaukee Electric Railway Light Company v. Railroad Commission of Wisconsin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
238 U.S. 174
Milwaukee Electric Railway Light Company v. Railroad Commission of Wisconsin
Argued: April 20 and 21, 1915. --- Decided: June 14, 1915
Messrs. Henry H. Pierce, Edwin S. Mack, William J. Curtis, George P. Miller, and Arthur W. Fairchild for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Walter Drew and Lester C. Manson, and Mr. W. C. Owen, Attorney General of Wisconsin, for defendant in error.
Mr. Daniel W. Hoan as amicus curioe.
[Amicus Curiae Information from page 175 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Milwaukee Railroad v. Soutter and Knapp

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
72 U.S. 660
Milwaukee Railroad v. Soutter and Knapp
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Wisconsin.
This was an appeal by the Milwaukee and Minnesota Railroad Company from an order of court confirming a sale made by the marshal under a decree of foreclosure of a mortgage on the western division of the La Crosse and Milwaukee Railroad.
The facts out of which the appeal grew were these: The original decree of foreclosure was rendered by the District Court of Wisconsin, then possessing full Circuit-Court powers, on the 13th of January, 1862; and on the 2d of October, 1862, the marshal made a sale under that decree. In the meantime, to wit, on the 15th July, 1862, Congress, by an act of that date, had established a Circuit Court for the district of Wisconsin, whereby all causes then pending in the District Court, which might have been brought, or which could have been originally cognizable in a Circuit Court, were transferred to the Circuit Court; and the District Court was deprived of all Circuit-Court powers. The marshal therefore returned the report of his sale into the Circuit Court. This was on the 6th day of October, 1862.
After several orders partially confirming the sale, the Circuit Court, January 17th, 1863, set it aside, and ordered the marshal to sell again according to the original decree. On the 25th of April, thereafter, the marshal made another sale.
Congress, however, on the 3d March, 1863, had passed a statute authorizing the District Courts where they had rendered final judgments or decrees, prior to the act of July 15th, 1862, in cases which might have been brought, and could have been originally cognizable in a Circuit Court, 'to issue writs of execution or other final process, or to use such other powers and proceedings as might be in accordance with law, to enforce the judgments and decrees aforesaid.' Acting under this law, the marshal reported this sale to the District Court, and that court made an order of confirmation. The appellants here, applied to the Circuit Court for a rule on the marshal to make a report of his sale to that court, which application was refused.
They now appealed from these orders of the Circuit and District Courts, and sought their reversal, on the ground that the District Court had no power to act in the matter of the confirmation of the sale, and that it properly belonged to the Circuit Court.
Messrs. Cram and Cushing, for the appellants; Messrs. Cary and Carlisle, contra.
Mr. Justice MILLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Milwaukee Railway Company v. Brooks Locomotive Works

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
121 U.S. 430
Milwaukee Railway Company v. Brooks Locomotive Works
[E. Mariner, for plaintiff in error.
F. C. Winkler and J. G. Jenkins, for defendant in error.
MATTHEWS, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company v. Wisconsin ex rel Milwaukee

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
252 U.S. 100
Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Company v. Wisconsin ex rel Milwaukee
Argued: Nov. 10, 1919. --- Decided: March 1, 1920
Mr. Edward S. Mach, of Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Clifton Williams, of Milwaukee, Wis., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Milwaukee Journal/1937/Flier Is Questioned on Enlistment for Spanish War Duty

* related portals: Associated Press.
* related authors: Eddie August Schneider.
Eddie August Schneider as the subject of an article written by the Associated Press and published in the Milwaukee Journal of Milwaukee, Wisconsin on January 16, 1937.
Flier Is Questioned on Enlistment for Spanish War Duty. New York City, New York; January 16, 1937 (Associated Press) Back from a month of dropping bombs on behalf of the Spanish loyalist government. Eddie Schneider, Jersey City aviator, said Friday he was signed up by a New York lawyer to serve in the war at $1,500 a month. Schneider was questioned by John F. Dailey, Jr., assistant United States attorney, who announced he would seek indictments from the federal grand jury next week against several New Yorkers in connection with the enlistment of American aviators for Spanish service. The flier said he quit the war to comply with President Roosevelt's neutrality policy end that the Spanish embassy in Paris advanced him his fare home pending payment of his salary. Schneider said he participated in daily bombing raids in Spain for three weeks, flying remodeled sport planes and dropping bombs through a hole in the cockpit floor.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works could have had their copyright renewed between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st of the 29th year.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mother (Coates)

"At twilight here I sit alone"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1908), "Mother" in The Century Magazine (August 1908).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1909), "Mother" in Lyrics of Life (1909).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "Mother" in Poems II.

## References

* ↑ View this version at Google Books.
# Mother! Oh! sing me to rest

* Mother, oh! sing me to rest, in National Lyrics, and Songs for Music (Songs of Spain), 1834.
* Mother! Oh, sing me to rest, originally published in A Collection of Peninsular Melodies in 1830 but taken here from The Poems of Felicia Hemans, 1872 edition.
# Mother's Day Proclamation

Written in 1870 by Julia Ward Howe.
Arise then...women of this day! Arise, all women who have hearts! Whether your baptism be of water or of tears! Say firmly: "We will not have questions answered by irrelevant agencies, Our husbands will not come to us, reeking with carnage, For caresses and applause. Our sons shall not be taken from us to unlearn All that we have been able to teach them of charity, mercy and patience. We, the women of one country, Will be too tender of those of another country To allow our sons to be trained to injure theirs."
From the bosum of a devastated Earth a voice goes up with Our own. It says: "Disarm! Disarm! The sword of murder is not the balance of justice." Blood does not wipe our dishonor, Nor violence indicate possession. As men have often forsaken the plough and the anvil at the summons of war, Let women now leave all that may be left of home For a great and earnest day of counsel. Let them meet first, as women, to bewail and commemorate the dead. Let them solemnly take counsel with each other as to the means Whereby the great human family can live in peace... Each bearing after his own time the sacred impress, not of Caesar, But of God - In the name of womanhood and humanity, I earnestly ask That a general congress of women without limit of nationality, May be appointed and held at someplace deemed most convenient And the earliest period consistent with its objects, To promote the alliance of the different nationalities, The amicable settlement of international questions, The great and general interests of peace.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mother-Love

"Think not of love as of a debt"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1909), "Mother-Love" in The Cosmopolitan (December 1909).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1909), "Mother-Love" in Lyrics of Life (1909).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "Mother-Love" in Poems II.

## References

* ↑ View this version at Google Books.
# Missa pro Defunctis

Commonly known as the Requiem Mass. "Requiem Masses are masses that are offered for the dead. They derive their name from the first word of the Introit, which may be traced to the Fourth Book of Esdras" —"Masses of Requiem," in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
English-language translations of Missa pro Defunctis include:
* The Service of High Mass for the Dead on the Day of Burial (1911) (transcription project)
* The Mass and Funeral Service of the late Rt. Hon Sir Wilfrid Laurier (1919) (external scan)
# Missing

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Missing."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Missing", a poem by Eleanor Cecilia Donnelly
* "Missing", a poem by Beatrice Witte Ravenel
# Mosser v. Darrow/Dissent Black

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Black
United States Supreme Court
341 U.S. 267
Mosser v. Darrow
Argued: April 10-11, 1951. --- Decided: May 7, 1951
Mr. Justice BLACK, dissenting.
The Special Master, District Court, Court of Appeals and this Court all seem to agree that the respondent trustee, Darrow, has been guilty of no act of bad faith. As a result of his administration, large profits accrued to the estate. Nevertheless, the Court now holds that respondent must be surcharged $43,000 solely because two of the trust's employees profited to that extent from trading in trust securities with his knowledge. This rule of trustee liability did not exist before today, as is shown by the fact that no statute or case is cited in support of the Court's decision.
Despite its novelty, there is much to be said in favor of such a rule for cases arising in the future. It seems to me, however, that there is no reason why the rule should be retroactively applied to this respondent when to do so is grossly unfair. Admittedly, the most that can be said against respondent is that he made an honest mistake which before today would not have subjected him to the heavy financial penalty. Under these circumstances, if the new rule is to be announced by the Court, I think it should be given prospective application only. See Great Northern R. Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co., 287 U.S. 358, 53 S.Ct. 145, 77 L.Ed. 360 and cases cited, 85 A.L.R. 262.
I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mosses from an Old Manse

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
short story collection, named for the Hawthorne's old manse where he and his wife lived for the first three years of their marriage. The first edition was published in 1846, and the second edition in 1854. one or more chapters are available in a spoken word format.

## Contents

* The Old Manse (1846)
* The Birth-mark (1843)
* A Select Party (1844)
* Young Goodman Brown (1835)
* Rappaccini's Daughter (1844)
* Mrs. Bullfrog (1837)
* Fire Worship (1843)
* Buds and Bird Voices (1843)
* Monsieur du Miroir (1837)
* The Hall of Fantasy (1843)
* The Celestial Rail-road (1843)
* The Procession of Life (1843)
* Feathertop (1852)
* The New Adam and Eve (1843)
* Egotism; or, The Bosom-Serpent (1843)
* The Christmas Banquet (1844)
* Drowne's Wooden Image (1844)
* The Intelligence Office (1844)
* Roger Malvin's Burial (1832)
* P.'s Correspondence (1845)
* Earth's Holocaust (1844)
* Passages from a Relinquished Work (1834)
* Sketches from Memory (1835)
* The Old Apple-Dealer (1843)
* The Artist of the Beautiful (1844)
* A Virtuoso's Collection (1842)
* 1 2 3 Added for the 1854 edition.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mosser v. Darrow

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
341 U.S. 267
Mosser v. Darrow
Argued: April 10-11, 1951. --- Decided: May 7, 1951
Messrs. Roger S. Foster, Washington, D.C., Stanley A. Kaplan, Chicago, Ill., for petitioners.
Messrs. Irving Herriott, Urban A. Lavery, Chicago, Ill., for respondents.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# NOAA – Critical Weather Day Declaration on April 17, 2024

A publication by the United States National Centers for Environmental Prediction, a branch of the United States National Weather Service
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# NOAA Storm Events Database – 2023 Pasadena–Deer Park tornado

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Centers for Environmental Information finalized report in the Storm Events Database for the 2023 Pasadena–Deer Park tornado. This report includes the finalized damage survey (Event Narrative) and statistics for the tornado as well as a meteorological synopsis (Episode Narrative) for the day and storm.
Event Details: :
| Event | Tornado |
| -- Scale | EF3 |
| -- Length | 23.66 Miles |
| -- Width | 1000 Yards |
| State | TEXAS |
| County/Area | HARRIS |
| WFO | HGX |
| Report Source | NWS Storm Survey |
| NCEI Data Source | CSV |
| Begin Date | 2023-01-24 14:15 CST-6 |
| Begin Location | 2SSE EAST HAVEN |
| Begin Lat/Lon | 29.6/-95.25 |
| End Date | 2023-01-24 14:50 CST-6 |
| End Location | 2N BAYTOWN HUMPHREY ARP |
| End Lat/Lon | 29.81/-94.95 |
| Deaths Direct/Indirect | 0/0 (fatality details below, when available...) |
| Injuries Direct/Indirect | 0/0 |
| Property Damage | 6.60M |
| Crop Damage | |
| Episode Narrative | Several tornadoes occurred across the area in the afternoon. |
| Event Narrative | This EF3 tornado touched down near El Franco Lee Park east of Brookside Village. A near-continuous path of damage extended east northeast, then northeast from there, across portions of Southeast Houston, Pasadena, Deer Park and Baytown. Most of the damage was rated EF0 and EF1 with damage to trees, fences and minor roof damage, but there were some spots with more severe damage, rated EF2. These included the Beamer apartments in Southeast Houston, a few homes in Pasadena, a church in Deer Park near Center Street and East P Street, and a single family home with roof and some walls removed near the intersection of East X Street and Luella. From an aerial survey, there were three high tension electrical towers flattened northeast of Deer Park near the Houston Ship Channel with EF3 damage. From there, the damage path entered Baytown, north of the Ship Channel. In Baytown there was a mobile home and a single family home destroyed along Weaver Street near Bayway. Damage became more spotty and less intense northeast from there with spotty damage as far north as TX 330 Spur. Aerial surveys indicated some minor roof damage to the Exxon building south of West Baker Street. Damage continued up to Interstate 10 where down power lines were observed. No damage was indicated north of Interstate 10. |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse