OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Up the Street

    At the news of his father's sudden death, which came at the end of his third year of graduate work, Hector went back to Olympus by the limited, and found that he was heir to some two hundred thousand dollars, and a sacred trust. The last words of Blanding, senior, were simple, and to the point. "Tell him," he had whispered to the Unitarian clergyman, who would understand, "tell him I don't care a darn how rich he is—I want him to be famous! Celebrated! Tell him I couldn't be. Hes' got to be. Not in underwear—academic! I want his name a household word!"
Up the Street A STORY OF COLLEGE FOOTBALL
By Holworthy Hall Author of "The Pepper McHenry Stories" Etc.
Look where the crimson banners fly; Hark to the sound of marching feet; There is a host approaching nigh- Harvard is marching up the street.
* Chapter 1
* Chapter 2
* Chapter 3
* Chapter 4
* Chapter 5
* Chapter 6
* Chapter 7
* Chapter 8
* Chapter 9
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1936, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 87 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Reports/Volume 176

* 176 U.S. 1 (1900) Louisiana v. Texas
* 176 U.S. 28 (1900) United States v. Oregon California Railroad Company
* 176 U.S. 51 (1900) Wilcox v. Eastern Oregon Land Company
* 176 U.S. 58 (1900) Messinger v. Eastern Oregon Land Company
* 176 U.S. 59 (1900) Blake v. McClung
* 176 U.S. 68 (1900) Holt v. Indiana Manufacturing Company
* 176 U.S. 73 (1900) Cruickshank v. Bidwell
* 176 U.S. 83 (1900) Bolln v. State of Nebraska
* 176 U.S. 92 (1900) City of New Orleans v. Warner
* 176 U.S. 97 (1900) The Newfoundland
* 176 U.S. 114 (1900) Clark v. City of Kansas City
* 176 U.S. 121 (1900) Robert Rae v. Homestead Loan Guaranty Company
* 176 U.S. 126 (1900) Lindsay Phelps Company v. Mullen
* 176 U.S. 156 (1899) Chew Hing Lung Company v. Wise
* 176 U.S. 167 (1900) Chicago, Milwaukee, & St. Paul Railway Company v. Tompkins
* 176 U.S. 181 (1900) Dickerman v. Northern Trust Company
* 176 U.S. 207 (1900) Glass v. Police Jury of the Parish of Concordia
* 176 U.S. 211 (1900) United States v. Bellingham Bay Boom Company
* 176 U.S. 219 (1900) Toledo, St. Louis& Kansas City Railroad Company v. Continental Trust Company of New York
* 176 U.S. 221 (1900) Ellis Roberts v. United States ex rel. Valentine
* 176 U.S. 232 (1900) Baltimore Potomac Railroad Company v. Cumberland
* 176 U.S. 242 (1900) United States v. Tennessee & Coosa Railroad Company
* 176 U.S. 257 (1900) Southern Railway Company v. Carnegie Steel Company
* 176 U.S. 298 (1900) Lackawanna Iron Coal Company v. Farmers' Loan Trust Company
* 176 U.S. 317 (1900) United States v. Mercantile Company
* 176 U.S. 321 (1900) Florida Central & Reninsular Railroad Company v. William J Bell W
* 176 U.S. 335 (1900) Adirondack Railway Company v. People of the State of New York
* 176 U.S. 350 (1900) Thormann v. Frame
* 176 U.S. 357 (1900) Benedict v. United States
* 176 U.S. 361 (1900) The Adula
* 176 U.S. 398 (1900) Roller v. Holly
* 176 U.S. 413 (1900) Moss v. Dowman
* 176 U.S. 422 (1900) United States v. Ortiz
* 176 U.S. 448 (1900) Guaranty Savings Bank v. Bladow
* 176 U.S. 459 (1900) United States v. Lim
* 176 U.S. 469 (1899) Walsh v. Columbus Hocking Valley Athens Railroad Company
* 176 U.S. 481 (1900) Wright v. Columbus Hocking Valley Athens Railroad Company
* 176 U.S. 484 (1900) Warburton v. White
* 176 U.S. 498 (1900) Baltimore Ohio Southwestern Railway Company v. Voigt
* 176 U.S. 521 (1900) Matteson v. Dent
* 176 U.S. 532 (1900) Jackson v. Emmons
* 176 U.S. 535 (1900) The Panama
* 176 U.S. 550 (1900) Weyerhaueser v. State of Minnesota
* 176 U.S. 559 (1900) Whitman v. National Bank of Oxford
* 176 U.S. 568 (1900) The Benito Estenger
* 176 U.S. 581 (1900) Maxwell v. Dow
* 176 U.S. 618 (1900) Aldrich v. Chemical National Bank
* 176 U.S. 640 (1900) Hancock National Bank v. Farnum
* 176 U.S. 646 (1900) Illinois Central Railroad Company v. City of Chicago
* 176 U.S. 668 (1900) Huntington v. Laidley
* 176 U.S. 684 (1900) International Navigation Company v. Farr Bailey Manufacturing Company
* 176 U.S. 685 (1900) McMaster v. New York Life Insurance Company
# United States Reports/Volume 178

* 178 U.S. 1 (1900) Roehm v. Horst
* 178 U.S. 22 (1900) Osborne v. San Diego Land Town Company of Maine
* 178 U.S. 41 (1900) Knowlton v. Moore
* 178 U.S. 111 (1900) High v. Coyne
* 178 U.S. 113 (1900) Fidelity Insurance Trust Safe Deposit Company v. McClain
* 178 U.S. 115 (1900) Plummer v. Coler
* 178 U.S. 139 (1900) Murdock v. Ward
* 178 U.S. 150 (1900) Sherman v. United States
* 178 U.S. 153 (1900) Chesapeake Ohio Railway Company v. Howard
* 178 U.S. 168 (1900) Castner v. Coffman
* 178 U.S. 186 (1900) Clarke v. Clarke
* 178 U.S. 196 (1900) Browning v. De Ford
* 178 U.S. 205 (1900) Moran v. Horsky
* 178 U.S. 215 (1900) Tarpey v. Andrew Madsen
* 178 U.S. 229 (1900) McDonnell v. Jordan
* 178 U.S. 239 (1900) Western Union Telegraph Company v. Ann Arbor Railroad Company
* 178 U.S. 245 (1900) Chicago Rock Island Pacific Railway Company v. Martin
* 178 U.S. 251 (1900) Rider v. United States
* 178 U.S. 262 (1900) North American Transportation Trading Company v. Donald Morrison
* 178 U.S. 270 (1900) Pittsburg Lake Angeline Iron Company v. Cleveland Iron Mining Company
* 178 U.S. 280 (1900) Corralitos Company v. United States
* 178 U.S. 289 (1900) Sully v. American National Bank
* 178 U.S. 304 (1900) Fitzpatrick v. United States
* 178 U.S. 317 (1900) Ex parte Union Steamboat Company
* 178 U.S. 321 (1900) John Wheeler v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company
* 178 U.S. 327 (1900) Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York v. Phinney
* 178 U.S. 345 (1900) Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York v. Sears
* 178 U.S. 347 (1900) Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York v. Hill
* 178 U.S. 351 (1900) Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York v. Allen
* 178 U.S. 353 (1900) Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company v. Clark
* 178 U.S. 373 (1900) Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Company v. Rochester
* 178 U.S. 389 (1900) New York Life Insurance Company v. Cravens
* 178 U.S. 402 (1900) Banholzer v. New York Life Insurance Company
* 178 U.S. 409 (1900) Deserant v. Cerillos Coal Railroad Company
* 178 U.S. 421 (1900) In re Connaway
* 178 U.S. 436 (1900) Smith v. Reeves
* 178 U.S. 449 (1900) Earle v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
* 178 U.S. 456 (1900) Earle v. Conway
* 178 U.S. 458 (1900) Columbus Winchester Motes v. United States
* 178 U.S. 476 (1900) Hawley v. Diller
* 178 U.S. 496 (1900) May Company v. City of New Orleans
* 178 U.S. 510 (1900) Dewey v. United States
* 178 U.S. 524 (1900) Bardes v. First National Bank of Hawarden Iowa
* 178 U.S. 539 (1900) Mitchell v. McClure
* 178 U.S. 541 (1900) Hicks v. Knost
* 178 U.S. 542 (1900) White v. Schloerb
* 178 U.S. 548 (1900) Taylor v. Beckham
* 178 U.S. 611 (1900) Boyle v. Sinclair
# United States Reports/Volume 180

* 180 U.S. 1 (1901) Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad Company v. Adams
* 180 U.S. 26 (1901) Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railway Company v. Adams
* 180 U.S. 28 (1901) Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Adams
* 180 U.S. 49 (1901) The Queen of the Pacific
* 180 U.S. 59 (1901) Bradshaw v. Ashley
* 180 U.S. 72 (1901) Thompson v. Los Angeles Farming Milling Company
* 180 U.S. 81 (1901) Gusman v. Marrero
* 180 U.S. 87 (1901) Turner v. Richardson
* 180 U.S. 92 (1901) District of Columbia v. Robinson
* 180 U.S. 109 (1901) Neely v. Henkel
* 180 U.S. 126 (1901) Dooley v. Pease
* 180 U.S. 132 (1901) Liverpool London Globe Insurance Company v. Kearney
* 180 U.S. 139 (1901) Hewitt v. Schultz
* 180 U.S. 167 (1901) Moore v. Cormode
* 180 U.S. 173 (1901) Powers v. Slaght
* 180 U.S. 180 (1901) Moore v. Stone
* 180 U.S. 185 (1901) City of New Orleans v. Fisher
* 180 U.S. 199 (1901) City of New Orleans v. Warner
* 180 U.S. 208 (1900) State of Missouri v. State of Illinois
* 180 U.S. 250 (1901) In re District of Columbia
* 180 U.S. 253 (1901) Ansley v. Ainsworth
* 180 U.S. 261 (1901) Montoya v. United States
* 180 U.S. 271 (1901) Conners v. United States
* 180 U.S. 276 (1901) City of Lampasas v. Bell
* 180 U.S. 284 (1901) Holly v. Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society of the Protestant Episcopal Church
* 180 U.S. 295 (1901) Robinson v. Southern National Bank of New York
* 180 U.S. 311 (1901) McDonald v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
* 180 U.S. 314 (1901) Marx v. Ebner
* 180 U.S. 320 (1901) New Orleans Debenture Redemption Company of Louisiana v. State of Louisiana
* 180 U.S. 333 (1901) Blythe v. Hinckley
* 180 U.S. 343 (1901) United States v. Beebe
* 180 U.S. 356 (1901) Bird v. United States
* 180 U.S. 362 (1901) Gardner v. Bonestell
* 180 U.S. 371 (1901) Rice v. Ames
* 180 U.S. 379 (1901) Wheless v. City of St. Louis
* 180 U.S. 383 (1901) Hobbs v. Beach
* 180 U.S. 402 (1901) Mitchell v. Furman
* 180 U.S. 440 (1901) Johns v. Wilson
* 180 U.S. 452 (1901) Cargill Company v. Minnesota Railroad Warehouse Commission
* 180 U.S. 471 (1901) Mitchell v. First National Bank of Chicago
* 180 U.S. 484 (1901) Thompson v. Ferry
* 180 U.S. 486 (1901) Sing v. United States
* 180 U.S. 496 (1901) Magruder v. Armes
* 180 U.S. 499 (1901) State of Minnesota v. Brundage
* 180 U.S. 506 (1901) Board of Commissioners of Wilkes County v. W. N. Coler & Company
* 180 U.S. 533 (1901) Mountain View Mining Milling Company v. McFadden
* 180 U.S. 536 (1901) In re McKenzie
* 180 U.S. 552 (1901) Throckmorton v. Holt
* 180 U.S. 587 (1901) Freeport Water Company v. City of Freeport
* 180 U.S. 619 (1901) Danville Water Company v. City of Danville
* 180 U.S. 624 (1901) Rogers Park Water Company v. Fergus
# United States Reports/Volume 18

5 Wheaton., ( 5 L.Ed. )
* 18 U.S. 1 (1820) Houston v. Moore (18 U.S. 1)
* 18 U.S. 76 (1820) United States v. Wiltberger
* 18 U.S. 116 (1820) McClung v. Ross
* 18 U.S. 127 (1820) The Venus Jademerowsky
* 18 U.S. 132 (1820) The London Packet
* 18 U.S. 144 (1820) United States v. Klintock
* 18 U.S. 153 (1820) United States v. Smith
* 18 U.S. 184 (1820) United States v. Furlong Hobson
* 18 U.S. 207 (1820) Stevenson's v. Sullivant
* 18 U.S. 269 (1820) Perkins v. Ramsey
* 18 U.S. 277 (1820) Mandeville v. Welch
* 18 U.S. 291 (1820) Wallace v. Anderson
* 18 U.S. 293 (1820) Polk's Lessee v. Wendell
* 18 U.S. 313 (1820) Marshall v. Beverley
* 18 U.S. 317 (1820) Loughborough v. Blake
* 18 U.S. 326 (1820) Mechanics' Bank of Alexandria v. The Bank of Columbia
* 18 U.S. 338 (1820) The Josefa Segunda
* 18 U.S. 359 (1820) Blake v. Doherty
* 18 U.S. 374 (1820) Handly's v. Anthony
* 18 U.S. 385 (1820) La Amistad De Rues
* 18 U.S. 394 (1820) Lyle v. Rodgers
* 18 U.S. 412 (1820) The United States v. Holmes
* 18 U.S. 420 (1820) Owings v. Speed
* 18 U.S. 424 (1820) Conn v. Penn
* 18 U.S. 429 (1820) Campbell v. Pratt
* 18 U.S. 433 The Atalanta
* 18 U.S. 434 (1820) United States v. Lancaster
# United States v. Langston

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
118 U.S. 389
United States v. Langston
Argued: May 10, 1886. ---
Atty. Gen. Garland and Asst. Atty. Gen. Watson, for the United States. Geo. A. King, for appellee, John M. Langston.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Lane

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
75 U.S. 185
United States v. Lane

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Lane Motor Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
344 U.S. 630
UNITED STATES v. LANE MOTOR CO.
Argued: Feb. 9, 1953. ---
Mr. Walter J. Cummings, Jr., Solicitor General of the United States, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Paul Harkey, Idabel, Okl., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Lane Motor Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
344 U.S. 630
UNITED STATES v. LANE MOTOR CO.
Argued: Feb. 9, 1953. ---
In this proceeding, the Government sought the forfeiture of an automobile and of a truck under the provisions of § 3116 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 3116, in the District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. That Section allows the seizure and forfeiture of property 'intended for use in violating' the alcohol tax laws, as well as property 'which has been so used'. The respondent, alleging an interest in the two vehicles, contested the forfeitures.
The district judge found the facts to be that the truck and automobile had each been used by the operator of an illegal distillery to drive a number of miles from his home and then parked at a point one-half mile or more from the distillery, the operator walking the rest of the way. The district judge found that the Government had not shown, as it had been alleged, that the vehicles had been used for transporting materials or utensils for use at the distillery, and ruled that the facts shown did not justify a forfeiture. The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed, 199 F.2d 495.
The Government has petitioned for a writ of certiorari showing that, while the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in United States v. One 1948 Plymouth Sedan, 1952, 198 F.2d 399, held in accord with the Tenth Circuit, the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has taken a contrary view, United States v. One 1950 Ford Half-Ton Pickup Automobile Truck, 1952, 195 F.2d 857. Certiorari is granted in order to resolve this conflict.
We think it clear that a vehicle used solely for commuting to an illegal distillery is not used in violating the revenue laws.
Certiorari granted, and the judgment affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Lane Same

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
260 U.S. 662
United States v. Lane Same
Argued: Jan. 2 and 3, 1923. --- Decided: Jan 22, 1923
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Riter, for the United States.
Mr. S. L. Herold, of Shreveport, La., for appellees in Nos. 160, 161, 162, and 163, and respondents in No. 191.
Mr. Elias Goldstein, of Shreveport, La., for appellees in No. 192.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Landram

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
118 U.S. 81
United States v. Landram
Argued: April 19, 1886. ---
Sol. Gen. Goode, for the United States.
Green B. Raum, for appellee, William J. Landram.
WOODS, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Reports/Volume 388

* 388 U.S. 1 (1967) Loving v. Virginia
* 388 U.S. 14 (1967) Washington v. Texas
* 388 U.S. 26 (1967) National Labor Relations Board v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.
* 388 U.S. 41 (1967) Berger v. New York
* 388 U.S. 130 (1967) Curtis Publishing Company v. Butts
* 388 U.S. 175 (1967) National Labor Relations Board v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company
* 388 U.S. 218 (1967) United States v. Wade
* 388 U.S. 263 (1967) Gilbert v. California
* 388 U.S. 293 (1967) Stovall v. Denno
* 388 U.S. 307 (1967) Walker v. City of Birmingham
* 388 U.S. 350 (1967) United States v. Sealy, Inc.
* 388 U.S. 365 (1967) United States v. Arnold Schwinn & Company
* 388 U.S. 395 (1967) Prima Paint Corporation v. Flood & Conklin Manufacturing Company
* 388 U.S. 426 (1967) Wisconsin v. Illinois
* 388 U.S. 431 (1967) Jacobs v. New York
* 388 U.S. 439 (1967) Tannenbaum v. New York
* 388 U.S. 440 (1967) Keney v. New York
* 388 U.S. 445 (1967) New York Central Company v. United States
* 388 U.S. 447 (1967) Aday v. United States
* 388 U.S. 448 (1967) Corinth Publications, Inc. v. Wesberry
* 388 U.S. 450 (1967) Rosenbloom v. Virginia
* 388 U.S. 451 Burkard v. New York
* 388 U.S. 452 (1967) Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas
* 388 U.S. 455 (1967) Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen v. United States
* 388 U.S. 456 (1967) Landau v. Fording
* 388 U.S. 458 (1967) Canton Poultry, Inc. v. Conner
* 388 U.S. 459 (1967) Parks v. Simpson Timber Company
* 388 U.S. 462 (1967) Stellas v. Esperdy
* 388 U.S. 463 (1967) Sandoval v. Utah
* 388 U.S. 464 (1967) Hadley v. Massachusetts
* 388 U.S. 465 (1967) Hemphill v. Illinois
* 388 U.S. 466 (1967) Fox v. Oregon
* 388 U.S. 906 (1967) Continental Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission
* 388 U.S. 908 (1967) Haynes v. United States
# United States Reports/Volume 392

* 392 U.S. 1 (1968) Terry v. Ohio
* 392 U.S. 40 (1968) Sibron v. New York
* 392 U.S. 83 (1968) Flast v. Cohen
* 392 U.S. 134 (1968) Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.
* 392 U.S. 157 (1968) United States v. Southwestern Cable Company
* 392 U.S. 183 (1968) Maryland v. Wirtz
* 392 U.S. 206 (1968) Cheng Fan Kwok v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
* 392 U.S. 219 (1968) Harrison v. United States
* 392 U.S. 236 (1968) Board of Education of Central School District No. 1 v. Allen
* 392 U.S. 273 (1968) Gardner v. Broderick
* 392 U.S. 280 (1968) Uniformed Sanitation Men Association v. Commissioner of Sanitation of the City of New York
* 392 U.S. 286 (1968) George Campbell Painting Corp. v. Reid
* 392 U.S. 293 (1968) Roberts v. Russell
* 392 U.S. 302 (1968) Jones v. Louisiana
* 392 U.S. 309 (1968) King v. Smith
* 392 U.S. 339 (1968) First Agricultural National Bank of Berkshire County v. State Tax Commission
* 392 U.S. 364 (1968) Mancusi v. DeForte
* 392 U.S. 378 (1968) Lee v. Florida
* 392 U.S. 390 (1968) Fortnightly Corporation v. United Artists Television, Inc.
* 392 U.S. 409 (1968) Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
* 392 U.S. 481 (1968) Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.
* 392 U.S. 514 (1968) Powell v. Texas
* 392 U.S. 571 (1968) American Commercial Lines, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company
* 392 U.S. 598 (1968) Wainwright v. City of New Orleans
* 392 U.S. 616 (1968) Miller v. California
* 392 U.S. 631 (1968) DeStefano v. Woods
* 392 U.S. 636 (1968) Lee Art Theatre, Inc. v. Virginia
* 392 U.S. 639 (1968) Houghton v. Shafer
* 392 U.S. 647 (1968) Lopinson v. Pennsylvania
* 392 U.S. 649 (1968) Spence v. North Carolina
* 392 U.S. 650 (1968) Streeter v. Craven
* 392 U.S. 651 (1968) Pope v. United States
* 392 U.S. 652 (1968) Wheat v. Washington
* 392 U.S. 653 (1968) Puentes v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 21
* 392 U.S. 654 (1968) Holland v. Hogan
* 392 U.S. 656 (1968) Maxwell v. Good Samaritan Hospital Association, Inc.
* 392 U.S. 657 (1968) Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc.
* 392 U.S. 658 (1968) Hopper v. Louisiana
* 392 U.S. 659 (1968) Clark Walter & Sons, Inc. v. United States
* 392 U.S. 660 (1968) Copas v. Schmidt
* 392 U.S. 661 (1968) Wade v. Yeager
* 392 U.S. 662 (1968) Toles v. Clark
* 392 U.S. 663 (1968) West v. California
* 392 U.S. 664 (1968) Carroll v. Texas
* 392 U.S. 665 (1968) McDaniel v. North Carolina
* 392 U.S. 666 (1968) Robinson v. Tennessee
* 392 U.S. 667 (1968) Taggart v. New York
* 392 U.S. 919 (1968) Alderman v. United States
* 392 U.S. 923 (1968) Ivanov v. United States
* 392 U.S. 923 (1968) Butenko v. United States
* 392 U.S. 925 (1968) Benton v. Maryland
# United States Reports/Volume 39

14 Pet.[ers], ( 10 L.Ed. )
* Evans v. Gee, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 1 (1840)
* Lessee of Lattimer v. Poteet, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 4 (1840)
* Bank of Metropolis v. Guttschlick, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 19 (1840)
* Kane v. Paul, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 33 (1840)
* Covington v. Comstock, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 43 (1840)
* Smith v. Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co., 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 45 (1840)
* Mitchell v. Lenox, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 49 (1840)
* West v. Brashear, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 51 (1840)
* Commonwealth Bank of Kentucky v. Griffith, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 56 (1840)
* Commercial & Railroad Bank of Vicksburg v. Slocomb, Richards & Co., 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 60 (1840)
* Suydam v. Broadnax, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 67 (1840)
* Carr v. Duval, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 77 (1840)
* Remington v. Linthicum, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 84 (1840)
* Frevall v. Bache, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 95 (1840)
* Peters v. Warren Ins. Co., 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 99 (1840)
* Atkins v. N. & J. Dick & Co., 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 114 (1840)
* Runyan v. Lessee of Coster, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 122 (1840)
* Preston v. Keene, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 133 (1840)
* Bank of Alexandria v. Dyer, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 141 (1840)
* Lessee of Walden v. Craig's Heirs, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 147 (1840)
* Walden v. Bodley, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 156 (1840)
* Edmonds v. Crenshaw, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 166 (1840)
* Keene v. Whitaker, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 170 (1840)
* Taylor v. Longworth, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 172 (1840)
* Lessee of Brewer v. Blougher, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 178 (1840)
* Sprigg v. Bank of Mount Pleasant, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 201 (1840)
* Rhode Island and Providence Plantations v. Massachusetts, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 210 (1840)
* De Valengin's Administrators v. Duffy, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 282 (1840)
* Irvine ex rel. Lumberman's Bank at Warren v. Lowry, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 293 (1840)
* United States v. Knight, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 301 (1840)
* Fowler v. Brantly, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 318 (1840)
* Games v. Stiles, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 322 (1840)
* United States v. Wiggins, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 334 (1840)
* Lessee of Pollard's Heirs v. Kibbe, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 353 (1840)
* United States v. Wood, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 430 (1840)
* Philadelphia and Trenton Railroad Company v. Stimpson, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 448 (1840)
* United States v. Morris, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 464 (1840)
* United States v. Heirs of Waterman, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 478 (1840)
* William & James Brown & Co. v. McGran, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 479 (1840)
* Decatur v. Paulding, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 497 (1840)
* United States v. Stone, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 524 (1840)
* United States v. Gratiot, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 526 (1840)
* Holmes v. Jennison, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 540 (1840)