OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Regulations on Reporting Activities in China by Foreign Journalists During the Beijing Olympic Games and the Preparatory Period

2006/12/01
Article 1
These Regulations are formulated to facilitate reporting activities carried out in accordance with the laws of the People's Republic of China by foreign journalists in China to advance and promote the Olympic Spirit during the Beijing Olympic Games and the preparatory period.
Article 2
These Regulations apply to reporting activities carried out by foreign journalists covering the Beijing Olympic Games and related matters in China during the Beijing Olympic Games and the preparatory period.
The Beijing Olympic Games mentioned in the Regulations refer to the 29th Olympic Games and the 13th Paralympic Games.
Article 3
Foreign journalists who intend to come to China for reporting should apply for visas at Chinese embassies, consulates or other visa-issuing institutions authorized by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China.
Foreign journalists who hold valid Olympic Identity and Accreditation Cards and Paralympic Identity and Accreditation Cards are entitled to multiple entries into the territory of the People's Republic of China with visa exemption by presenting Olympic Identity and Accreditation Cards, together with valid passports or other travel documents.
Article 4
Foreign journalists may bring a reasonable quantity of reporting equipments into China duty free for their own use. The aforementioned equipments should be shipped out of China's territory at the end of their reporting activities.
To bring into China reporting equipment duty free for their own use, foreign journalists should apply for the Equipment Confirmation Letter at Chinese embassies or consulates and present the Equipment Confirmation Letter together with a J-2 visa when going through customs inspection. Foreign journalists who hold Olympic Identity and Accreditation Cards and Paralympic Identity and Accreditation Cards may present the Equipment Confirmation Letter issued by the Organizing Committee of the 29th Olympic Games when going through customs inspection.
Article 5
For reporting needs, foreign journalists may, on a temporary basis, bring in, install and use radio communication equipment after completing the required application and approval procedures.
Article 6
To interview organizations or individuals in China, foreign journalists need only to obtain their prior consent.
Article 7
Foreign journalists may, through organizations providing services to foreign nationals, hire Chinese citizens to assist them in their reporting activities.
Article 8
The media guide for foreign journalists of the Beijing Olympic Games shall be formulated by the Organizing Committee of the 29th Olympic Games in accordance with these Regulations.
Article 9
These Regulations shall come into force as of 1 January 2007 and expire on 17 October 2008.
# Schaffer v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
362 U.S. 511
Schaffer v. United States
Argued: March 24, 1960. --- Decided: May 16, 1960
See 363 U.S. 858, 80 S.Ct. 1605.
Mr. Jacob Kossman, Philadelphia, Pa., for Max Schaffer and Norman Schaffer, petitioners.
Mr. Harris B. Steinberg, New York City, for Hyman Karp and Benjamin T. Marco, petitioners.
Mr. John F. Davis, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Schaffer Transportation Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
355 U.S. 83
Schaffer Transportation Company v. United States
Argued: Nov. 13, 1957. --- Decided: Dec 9, 1957
Mr. Peter T. Beardsley, Washington, D.C., for appellants.
Mr. Charles H. Weston, for appellee United States.
Mr. H. Neil Garson, Washington, D.C., for appellee Interstate Commerce Commission.
Mr. Amos M. Mathews, Chicago, Ill., for appellees intervening rail carriers.
Mr. Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Schaff v. J C Famechon Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
258 U.S. 76
Schaff v. J C Famechon Company
Argued: Jan. 16, 1922. --- Decided: Feb 27, 1922
Mr. C. W. Bunn, of St. Paul, Minn., for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Charles Burke Elliott, of Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 77-78 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice DAY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Schafer v. Helvering

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
299 U.S. 171
Schafer v. Helvering
Argued: Nov. 17, 1936. --- Decided: Dec 7, 1936
Mr. Eugene Untermyer, of New York City, for petitioners.
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Shakespeare's Songs/Take, O Take Those Lips Away

From Measure for Measure.
TAKE, O TAKE THOSE LIPS AWAY
Take, O take those lips away,
That so sweetly were forsworn;
And those eyes, the break of day.
Lights that do mislead the morn:
But my kisses bring again, bring again;
Seals of love, but seal'd in vain, seal'd in vain.
# Shakespeare's Songs/Who Is Silvia?

From The Two Gentlemen of Verona.
WHO IS SILVIA?
Who is Silvia? what is she, That all our swains commend her? Holy, fair, and wise is she; The heaven such grace did lend her, That she might admired be.
Is she kind as she is fair,— For beauty lives with kindness? Love doth to her eyes repair To help him of his blindness; And, being helped, inhabits there.
Then to Silvia let us sing That Silvia is excelling; She excels each mortal thing Upon the dull earth dwelling: To her let us garlands bring.
# Shakespeare's Songs/Where the Bee Sucks

From The Tempest.
WHERE THE BEE SUCKS
Where the bee sucks, there suck I:
In a cowslip's bell I lie;
There I couch when owls do cry.
On the bat's back I do fly
After summer merrily.
Merrily, merrily, shall I live now
Under the blossom that hangs on the bough.
# Shakespeare's Songs/Spring

From Love's Labour's Lost.
SPRING
When daisies pied and violets blue, And lady-smocks all silver-white, And cuckoo-buds of yellow hue Do paint the meadows with delight, The cuckoo then on every tree Mocks married men; for thus sings he, Cuckoo; Cuckoo, cuckoo: O word of fear, Unpleasing to a married ear!
When shepherds pipe on oaten straws And merry larks are ploughmen's clocks, When turtles tread, and rooks, and daws, And maidens bleach their summer smocks, The cuckoo then on every tree Mocks married men; for thus sings he, Cuckoo; Cuckoo, cuckoo: O word of fear, Unpleasing to a married ear!
# Shakespeare's Songs/Tell Me Where Is Fancy Bred

From The Merchant of Venice.
TELL ME WHERE IS FANCY BRED
Tell me where is fancy bred, Or in the heart or in the head? How begot, how nourished? Reply, reply.
It is engender'd in the eyes, With gazing fed; and fancy dies In the cradle where it lies. Let us all ring fancy's knell; I'll begin it,—Ding, dong, bell.
All. Ding, dong, bell.
# Shakespeare's Songs/What Shall He Have That Kill'd the Deer?

From As You Like It.
WHAT SHALL HE HAVE THAT KILL'D THE DEER
What shall he have that kill'd the deer? His leather skin and horns to wear. Then sing him home! [The rest shall bear this burthen. Take thou no scorn to wear the horn; It was a crest ere thou wast born: Thy father's father wore it, And thy father bore it: The horn, the horn, the lusty horn Is not a thing to laugh to scorn.
# Shakespeare's Songs/Under the Greenwood Tree

From As You Like It.
UNDER THE GREENWOOD TREE
Under the greenwood tree Who loves to lie with me, And turn his merry note Unto the sweet bird's throat, Come hither, come hither, come hither: Here shall he see No enemy But winter and rough weather.
Who doth ambition shun [All together here And loves to live i'th'sun, here. Seeking the food he eats And pleased with what he gets, Come hither, come hither, come hither: Here shall he see No enemy But winter and rough weather.
# Shakespeare's Songs/Will You Buy Any Tape?

From The Winter's Tale.
WILL YOU BUY ANY TAPE?
Will you buy any tape, Or lace for your cape, My dainty duck, my dear-a? Any silk, any thread. Any toys for your head Of the new'st and fin'st, fin'st wear-a? Come to the pedler; Money's a meddler, That doth utter all men's ware-a.
# Shakespeare's Songs/When Daffodils Begin to Peer

From The Winter's Tale.
WHEN DAFFODILS BEGIN TO PEER
When daffodils begin to peer, With hey! the doxy over the dale, Why, then comes in the sweet o' the year; For the red blood reigns in the winter's pale.
The white sheet bleaching on the hedge, With hey! the sweet birds, O, how they sing! Doth set my pugging tooth on edge; For a quart of ale is a dish for a king.
The lark, that tirra-lirra chants, With hey! with hey! the thrush and the jay, Are summer songs for me and my aunts, While we lie tumbling in the hay.
# Shakespeare's Songs/When That I Was and a Little Tiny Boy

From Twelfth Night.
When That I Was and a Little Tiny Boy
# Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Morrow Valley Land Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas
2012 Ark. 247
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MORROW LAND VALLEY COMPANY, LLC, AND BEN CAIN
Appeal from Washington County Circuit Court
No. 11-905 --- Opinion delivered: May 31, 2012
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Goodson
Appeal from Washington County Circuit Court, No. CIV2009-4076-4, Mary Anne Gunn, Judge; affirmed on direct appeal; dismissed without prejudice on cross-appeal.
Opinion of the Court by Justice KAREN R. BAKER. Concurring opinion by Justice COURTNEY HUDSON GOODSON, joined by Justices DONALD L. CORBIN and PAUL E. DANIELSON.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sawyer v. Prickett

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
86 U.S. 146
Sawyer v. Prickett

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Second Epistle

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Second Epistle."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.

## See also

Various epistles (i.e. letters) which are generally known as "second":
* Second Epistle of Clement to the Corinthians
* Second Epistle of Ignatius to John
* Second Epistle of John
* Second Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians
* Second Epistle of Paul to the Thessalonians
* Second Epistle of Paul to Timothy
* Second Epistle of Peter
# Second Epistle of Clement

* related portals: Christianity.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Clement of Rome An early Christian homily, traditionally ascribed to Clement, but anonymous. From 130 to 160 CE.
English-language translations of Κλήμεντος ἐπιστολὴ πρὸς Κορινθίους Βʹ include:
* Second Epistle of Clement translated by William Wake, first published in The suppressed Gospels and Epistles, 18th century
* Second Epistle of Clement translated by Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson, first published in Ante-Nicene Christian Library, 19th century
* Second Epistle of Clement translated by John Keith, first published in Ante-Nicene Fathers, 19th century
* Second Epistle of Clement translated by Joseph Barber Lightfoot, 19th century
* Second Epistle of Clement translated by Charles H. Hoole, 1885
* 2 Clement from The Apostolic Fathers by Kirsopp Lake, 1912

## Works about 2 Clement

* Introductory Notice to the Homily Known as the Second Epistle of Clement by Arthur Cleveland Coxe in Ante-Nicene Fathers
* Introduction to the Second Epistle of Clement by M. B. Riddle, ibid.

## See also

* 1 Clement, an unrelated 1st century work

## External link

* Early Christian Writings: 2 Clement
Old Testament
* Genesis
* Exodus
* Leviticus
* Numbers
* Deuteronomy
* Joshua
* Judges
* Ruth
* 1 Samuel
* 2 Samuel
* 1 Kings
* 2 Kings
* 1 Chronicles
* 2 Chronicles
* Ezra
* Nehemiah
* Esther
* Job
* Psalms
* Proverbs
* Ecclesiastes
* Song of Solomon
* Isaiah
* Jeremiah
* Lamentations
* Ezekiel
* Daniel
* Hosea
* Joel
* Amos
* Obadiah
* Jonah
* Micah
* Nahum
* Habakkuk
* Zephaniah
* Haggai
* Zechariah
* Malachi
Deuterocanon/Apocrypha
* 1 Esdras
* 2 Esdras
* Tobit
* Judith
* Additions to Esther
* Wisdom of Solomon
* Susanna
* Syrach
* Baruch
* Letter of Jeremiah
* Additions to Daniel
* Prayer of Manasses
* 1 Maccabees
* 2 Maccabees
* 3 Maccabees
* 4 Maccabees
* 5 Maccabees
* 6 Maccabees
* 7 Maccabees
* 8 Maccabees
* Psalms of Solomon
* Odes
* Enoch
* Jubilees
* 1 Meqabyan
* 2 Meqabyan
* 3 Meqabyan
* Additions to Baruch
* 1 Clement
* 2 Clement
* Acts of Philip
* Acts of Pilate
* Laodiceans
* Apocalypse of Peter
New Testament
* Matthew
* Mark
* Luke
* John
* Acts
* Romans
* 1 Corinthians
* 2 Corinthians
* Galatians
* Ephesians
* Philippians
* Colossians
* 1 Thessalonians
* 2 Thessalonians
* 1 Timothy
* 2 Timothy
* Titus
* Philemon
* Hebrews
* James
* 1 Peter
* 2 Peter
* 1 John
* 2 John
* 3 John
* Jude
* Revelation
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Second Federal Savings and Loan Association of Cleveland v. Bowers

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
358 U.S. 305
Second Federal Savings and Loan Association of Cleveland v. Bowers
See 359 U.S. 932, 79 S.Ct. 605.
Mr. Robert G. Day, for appellant.
Messrs. William Saxbe, Atty. Gen. of Ohio and John M. Tobin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. Opinion per curiam.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Second Federal Savings and Loan Association of Cleveland v. Bowers/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
358 U.S. 305
Second Federal Savings and Loan Association of Cleveland v. Bowers
Mr. Justice HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Second Deed of Gift

THE “SECOND” DEED of GIFT of the AMERICA'S CUP
2nd February, 1882.
Any organized Yacht Club of a foreign country, incorporated, patented or licensed by the legislature, admiralty or other executive' department, having for its annual regatta an ocean water course on the sea or on an arm of the sea (or one which combines both), practicable for vessels of 300 tons, shall always be entitled, through one or more of its members, to the right of sailing a match for this Cup, with a yacht or other vessel propelled by sails only, and constructed in the country to which the Challenging Club belongs, against any one yacht or vessel as aforesaid, constructed in the country of the club holding the Cup.
The yacht or vessel to be of not less than 30 nor more than 300 tons, measured by the Custom House rule in use by the country of the challenging party.
The challenging party shall give six months' notice in writing, naming the day for the proposed race, which day shall not be later than seven months from the date of the notice.
The parties intending to sail for the Cup may, by mutual consent, make any arrangement satisfactory to both as to the date, course, time allowance, number of trials, rules and sailing regula­tions, and any and all other conditions of the match, in which case also the six-months' notice may be waived.
In case the parties cannot mutually agree upon the terms of a match, then the challenging party shall have the right to contest for the Cup in one trial, sailed over the usual course for the Annual Regatta of the club holding the Cup, subject to its rules and sailing regulations, the challenged party not being required to name its representative until the time agreed upon for the start.
Accompanying the six-months' notice, there must be a Custom House certificate of the measurement, and a statement of the dimensions, rig and name of the vessel.
No vessel which has been defeated in a match for this Cup can again be selected by any club for its representative until after a contest for it by some other vessel has intervened, or until after the expiration of two years from the time such contest has taken place.
Vessels intending to compete for this Cup must proceed under sail on their own bottoms to the port where the contest is to take place.
Should the Club holding the Cup be for any cause dissolved, the Cup shall be handed over to any club of the same nationality it may select which comes under the foregoing rules.
It is to be distinctly understood that the Cup is to be the property of the club and not of the owners of the vessel winning it in a match, and that the conditions of keeping it open to be sailed for by organized yacht clubs of all foreign countries, upon the terms above laid down, shall forever attach to it, thus making it perpetually a Challenge Cup for friendly competition between foreign countries.
Signed, George L. Schuyler

## See also

First Deed of Gift Deed of Gift
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Second Generation

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Second Generation."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* The Second Generation, a short story by Algernon Blackwood
* The Second Generation, a short story by Stephen Crane
# Science (journal)/Volume 5

* No. 100 (January 2)
* No. 101 (January 9)
* No. 102 (January 16)
* No. 103 (January 23)
* No. 104 (January 30)
* No. 105 (February 6)
* No. 106 (February 13)
* No. 107 (February 20)
* No. 108 (February 27)
* No. 109 (March 6)
* No. 110 (March 13)
* No. 111 (March 20)
* No. 112 (March 27)
* No. 113 (April 3)
* No. 114 (April 10)
* No. 115 (April 17)
* No. 116 (April 24)
* No. 117 (May 1)
* No. 118 (May 8)
* No. 119 (May 15)
* No. 120 (May 22)
* No. 121 (May 29)
* No. 122 (June 5)
* No. 123 (June 12)
* No. 124 (June 19)
* No. 125 (June 26)
# Science (journal)/Volume 5/No. 100/Military Cetology

DOI: 10.1126/science.ns-5.100.2-b, page 2-3
Military cetology.
In the exhaustive essay upon brush-making, by Capt. A, L. Varney, in the last report of the secretary of war (vol. iii. p. 190), I find, in connection with much information of interest to the zoölogist, some remarks upon cetaceans which are unique in their way, and show how dangerous it is for one unacquainted with a subject to attempt to instruct others therein. After stating that "whalebone, or baleen, is a horny substance, consisting of fibrous laminae laid laid lengthwise along the upper jaw of the whale," our author proceeds to give the following information about the order Cetacea in general: —
"Zoölogically, whales, or mammallia of the cetacean order, are divided into two great families, — 'blowing' cetacea, so called from the habit of spouting water through the nasal openings or spiracles in the top of the head; and 'herbivorous' cetacea (Manati). The family of 'blowing' cetacea is divided into two tribes, — the tribe of whales (Balaena); and the dolphin tribe, distinguished mainly by the size and shape of the head. ​“The whale tribe (Balaenidae) is divded into the genus whale and the genus cachalot (sperm whale). The genus whale produces the baleen,” etc.
This travesty of truth was evidently compiled from text books, of fifty years ago, and, although somewhat amusing from its complete erroneousness, cannot be too severely criticised. Cetology is certainly not in so advanced a condition as could be wished; but there are numerous recent works in which the outlines of the subject are correctly laid down, and from which our author might have gathered facts, and not fictions, with which to preface his chapter upon whalebone.
U.S. national museum.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Science (journal)/Volume 5/No. 100/Why is Water Considered Ghost-Proof?

DOI: 10.1126/science.ns-5.100.2, page 2
Why is water considered ghost-proof?
As a possible partial explanation of the fact referred to by Dr. Edward B. Tylor, in his address before the Anthropological society of Washington {see Science, iv. 548, col. 2), of the wide-spread belief among savages 'that water is impassable to spirits,'the obstacle which it presents to dogs in pursuing their prey by scent may be suggested. This latter fact must be well known to most uncivilized races; and the mystery of tracking by scent must furnish a fertile theme for the exercise of the savage imagination, while the scent itself of a human being would be readily attributed to his spirit. Can anthropologists show any 'historical connection' between the fact and the belief? Lester F. Ward
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse