OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/4th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 21

Chap. XXI.—An Act to authorize the adjustment and payment at the treasury, of the expenses of George Smith and John Robertson, for their ransom from captivity at Algiers.
Accounts of Smith and Robertson to be settled.Be it enacted, &c., That the accounting officers of the Treasury shall be, and they hereby are authorized to examine the claims and vouchers of George Smith and John Robertson, respectively, for the sums severally paid and expended by them, for their ransoms from captivity among the Algerines, and after deducting from the amount of such payments and expenditures, any sum or sums heretofore paid to the said George Smith or John Robertson, on the account of the United States, towards his respective claim, to allow the balance thereof, not exceeding eight hundred and seventy-four dollars to George Smith, and not exceeding two thousand two hundred and seventy-one dollars to the said John Robertson; and which balances shall be paid at the Treasury, out of any money not already appropriated.
Approved, March 3, 1797.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/5th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 19

Chap. XIX.—An Act for the relief of Silvanus Crowell.
Be it enacted, &c.,Allowance to Silvanus Crowell. That if it shall be proved to the satisfaction of the collector of the port of Barnstable, in the State of Massachusetts, that agreements were made according to the direction of the act, entitledAct of Feb. 16, 1792, ch. 6. “An Act concerning certain fisheries of the United States, and for the regulation and government of the fishermen employed therein,” between the masters and fishermen employed on board the schooners Jerusha, Phœbe, and Ruth, belonging to Yarmouth, in the State aforesaid, countersigned by the owners, or their agent, for a fishing voyage, in the year one thousand seven hundred and ninety-six; and that the said agreements were casually destroyed by fire; then, and in such case, the ​said collector is authorized and directed to make and pay to the said Silvanus Crowell, or other agent of the owners of the said schooners, such allowance as they would have been entitled to, under the act aforesaid, provided the said agreements had been produced to said collector.
Approved, March 19, 1798.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/4th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 6

Chap. VI.—An Act for the relief of Israel Loring.
Be it enacted, &c.,Certain drawback to be allowed to Israel Loring. That the collector of the district of New York be, and he is hereby authorized, at any time within sixty days after the passing of this act, to allow the drawback upon such a quantity of indigo, as was imported into New York from New Orleans, on the tenth day of July, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-four, by Israel Loring, in the brigantine Diana, Allen Hill, master, and which was, on the nineteenth of August following, entered for exportation on board the brig Lydia, John H. Shackerly, master, for Amsterdam; notwithstanding bonds were not given, and an oath was not taken, at the time of exportation: Provided, That every other requisite has been complied with relative thereto, which, by law, is required to entitle him to the same.
Approved, March 10, 1796.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/4th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 9

Chap. IX.—An Act for the relief of Joze Roiz Silva.
Be it enacted, &c.,J.R. Silva refunded a surplus of duties, on producing certain proofs. That the collector of the district of New York be, and he is hereby authorized, at any time within sixty days after the passing of this act, to receive from Joze Roiz Silva, of the city of New York, merchant, invoices and other proofs respecting the value of a cargo of wines imported by him into the said district, in or about the month of June, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-three, in the brig Mary, William Hopper, master, from the island of Graciosa; and if it shall appear to the satisfaction of the said collector, that the said ​cargo, or any part thereof, was subject to a less duty than that charged to, and paid by the said Joze Roiz Silva therefor, then, and in such case, the said collector is hereby required to allow or refund to the said Joze Roiz Silva such excess or sum as shall appear to have been overcharged and paid on the same, in like manner, as if such invoices and proofs had been produced in due time.
Approved, March 23, 1796.
# Hebrews (Bible)

Hebrews is a book in the Bible.
English-language translations of Pros Ebraious include:
* Bible (Wycliffe)/Hebrews (1380s)
* Bible (Tyndale)/Hebrews (1526)
* Bible (King James)/Hebrews (1611)
* Bible (American Standard)/Hebrews (1901)
* Bible (World English)/Hebrews (in progress since 1997)
* Bible (Wikisource)/Hebrews (in progress since 2006)
* Bible (Literal Standard Version)/Hebrews (2020)

## About

* "Hebrews, Epistle to the," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
# Hecht Company v. Bowles

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
321 U.S. 321
Hecht Company v. Bowles
Argued: Feb. 3, 4, 1944. --- Decided: Feb 28, 1944
Mr. Charles A. Horsky, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Chester T. Lane, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hebrews

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Hebrews."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Hebrews, book of the Bible.
* "Hebrews", poem by James Oppenheim
* "Hebrews, Epistle to the," in Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897)
* "Hebrews," in Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897)
* Gospel of the Hebrews, a lost text
# What Will He Do With It? (Belford)/Book 5

* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
* Chapter VII
* Chapter VIII
* Chapter IX
* Chapter X
# What Will He Do With It? (Belford)/Book 5/Chapter 6

CHAPTER VI.
Being a chapter that comes to an untimely end.
Winter was far advanced when Montfort Court was again brightened by the presence of its lady. A polite letter from Mr. Carr Vipont had reached her before leaving Windsor, suggesting how much it would be for the advantage of the Vipont interest if she would consent to visit for a month or two the seat in Ireland, which had been too long neglected, and at which my lord would join her on his departure from his Highland moors. So to Ireland went Lady Montfort. My lord did not join her there; but Mr. Carr Vipont deemed it desirable for the Vipont interest that the wedded pair should reunite at Montfort Court, where all the Vipont family were invited to witness their felicity or mitigate their ennui.
But, before proceeding another stage in this history, it becomes a just tribute of respect to the great House of Vipont to pause and place its past records and present grandeur in fuller display before the reverential reader. The House of Vipont! What am I about? The House of Vipont requires a chapter to itself.
# What Will He Do With It? (Belford)/Book 5/Chapter 3

CHAPTER III.
At the end of the very first lesson George Morley saw, that all the elocution-masters to whose skill he had been consigned were blunderers in comparison to the basket-maker.
Waife did not puzzle him with scientific theories. All that the great comedian required of him was to observe and to imitate. Observation, imitation, lo! the ground-work of all art! the primal element of all genius! Not there, indeed, to halt, but there ever to commence. What remains to carry on the ​intellect to mastery? Two steps—to reflect, to reproduce. Observation, imitation, reflection, reproduction. In these stands a mind complete and consummate, fit to cope with all labor, achieve all success.
At the end of the first lesson George Morley felt that his cure was possible. Making an appointment for the next day at the same place, he came thither stealthily, and so on day by day. At the end of a week he felt that the cure was nearly sure; at the end of a month the cure was self-evident. He should live to preach the Word. True, that he practised incessantly in private. Not a moment in his waking hours that the one thought, one object, were absent from his mind; true, that with all his patience, all his toil, the obstacle was yet serious, might never be entirely overcome. Nervous hurry—rapidity of action—vehemence of feeling brought back, might, at unguarded moments, always bring back the gasping breath—the emptied lungs—the struggling utterance. But the relapse—rarer and rarer now with each trial—would be at last scarce a drawback. " Nay," quoth Waife, " instead of a drawback, become but an orator, and you will convert a defect into a beauty."
Thus justly sanguine of the accomplishment of his life's chosen object, the scholar's gratitude to Waife was unspeakable. And seeing the man daily at least in his own cottage—Sophy's health restored to her cheeks, smiles to her lip, and cheered at her light fancy-work beside her grandsire's elbow-chair, with fairy legends instilling perhaps golden truths—seeing Waife thus, the scholar mingled with gratitude a strange tenderness of respect. He knew naught of the vagrant's past—his reason might admit that in a position of life so at variance with the gifts natural and acquired of the singular basket-maker, there was something mysterious and suspicious. But he blushed to think that he had ever ascribed to a flawed or wandering intellect the eccentricities of glorious Humor—abetted an attempt to separate an old age so innocent and genial from a childhood so fostered and so fostering. And sure I am that if the whole world had risen up to point the finger of scorn at the one-eyed cripple, George Morley, the well-born gentleman—the refined scholar—the spotless Churchman—would have given him his arm, to lean upon, and walked by his side unashamed.
# Gramachree Molly

Date is estimated.
Gramachree Molly,
WITH THE
ANSWER
To which are added,
SCORNFU' NANSY,
A N D
The POWER of LOVE.
Entered according to Order
* Gramachree Molly
* Scornfu' Nansy
* The power of love
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gramachree Molly/Scornfu' Nansy

Date is estimated.
SCORNFU' NANSY.
NAnsy's to the Green Wood gane, to hear the gowdſpink chatt'ring, And Willie he has follow'd her, to gain her love by flatt'ring:
​But a' that he cou'd ſay or do, she geck'd and ſcorned at him; And ay when he began to woo, she bade bim mind wha gat him.
What ails thee at my dad, quoth he, my minnie, or my aunty! With crowdy mowdy they fed me, lang-kail and ranty-tanty:
With bannocks of good barley-meal, of thae they were right plenty, With chapped ſtocks butter'd fu' weel, and was nae that right dainty.
Although my father was nae laird, 'tis daffin to be vaunty, He keepet ay a good kail-yard, a ha' houſe and a pantry:
A good blue bonnet on his head, an o'erlay 'bout his craigy; And ay unto the day he dy'd, he rade on good shanks naggy.
Now wae and wander on your ſnout, wad ye hae bonay Nanſy! Wad ye compare ye'er fell to me, a docken to a tansie!
I hae a wooer of my ain, they ca' him souple Sandy, And weel I wat his bonny mou' is ſweet like fugar-candy. ​Wow, Nansy, what needs a' this din? do l not ken this Sandy? I’m sure the chief of a' his kin was Rab' the beggar randy:
His minnie Meg upo' her back bare baith him and his billy; Will ye compare a nasty pack, to me your winsome Willie?
My Gutcher left a good braid sword, though it be auld and rusty. Yet ye may tak it on my word, it is baith true and trusty;
And if I can but get it draws, which will be right uneasy, I shall lay baith my lugs in pawn, that he stiall get a heezy.
Then Nansy turn’d her round about, and said, Did Sandy hear ye, Ye wadna miss to get a clout, I ken he difna fear ye.
Sae ha’d your tongue, and say nae mair, set some where else your fancy. For as lang as Sandy’s to the fore, ye never shall get Nansy.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Grame v. Mutual Assurance Society of Virginia Goddin

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
112 U.S. 273
Grame v. Mutual Assurance Society of Virginia Goddin
Wm. B. Webb, Enoch Totten, and John Howard, for plaintiffs in error.
Geo. F. Edmunds, W. A. Maury, Wm. W. Crump, and W. Hallett Phillips, for defendants in error.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gramachree Molly/The power of love

Date is estimated.
THE POWER OF LOVE.
AH! Gods, what can be stranger, sure none but Love, or you. ​Cou'd e'er so fix a Ranger, as I am fixed now.
My mind till now in ranging, like bees from flow'r to flow'r, Was only pleas'd when changing, but now can change no more.
For Bella, handſome Bella, my dear I'm only thine, Thy wit admits no fellow, thy beauty is divine.
Ye powers, be kind, attend her, and ard her from all harms, From other men defend her, conduct her to my arms.
If heaven grant me my honey, a fig for all besides; What care I for your money, was Bella but my bride.
I'd range the world all over, then in the golden ſhower, Like Jove or Diana's lover, in Bella's lap I'd pour,
The wealth of both the Indies, and bleſs my dearest life, With store of richeſt dainties, becoming ſuch a wife.
FINIS.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hinckley v. Gilman Clinton and Springfield Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
94 U.S. 467
Hinckley v. Gilman Clinton and Springfield Railroad Company
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois.
In the progress of a suit for the foreclosure of a mortgage executed by the Gilman, Clinton, and Springfield Railroad Company, Francis E. Hinckley was appointed receiver. On the 8th of April, 1876, a final decree was rendered, under which, on the 10th of June, the mortgaged property was sold, and subsequently conveyed to the purchasers. Upon a settlement of the accounts of the receiver, a balance was found due from him of $18,776.25, for which a decree was entered Sept. 27, directing its payment into court on or before Oct. 10. On the 9th of October he prayed this appeal 'from the decree against him,' which was granted. The complainants now move to dismiss, for the reason that he was not a party to the suit.
Mr. R. Biddle Roberts in support of the motion.
The appellant is not a party to the suit, and cannot be. Being merely the officer or representative of the court, without any personal interest whatever in the litigation, the right to discharge him rests with the court, at any stage of the controversy; and from the exercise of this right he cannot appeal. High on Receivers, 536; In re Colvin, 3 Md. Ch. 300; Ellicott v. Warford, 4 Md. 80. Only those who are parties to the record can sue out a writ of error. Phillips's Practice, p. 64, and cases there cited. The same rule applies to appeals. Id. p. 65. On the eighth day of April, the final decree was entered, from which an appeal was not prayed, nor could it, in the ollowing October, be taken, much more than sixty days having then elapsed. Kitchen v. Randolph, 93 U.S. 86. The decree of Sept. 27, requiring the payment of money into court, was merely interlocutory, transferring the possession of property in litigation. The rule of finality cannot apply to it. Forgay v. Conrad, 6 How. 201. This doctrine is sustained by Thomson v. Dean, 7 Wall. 342; Railroad Company v. Bradley, 7 id. 577; Stowall v. Banks, 10 id. 583; and it would seem to be the settled law in this court.
Mr. H. Crawford and Mr. S. P. McConnell, contra.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hinchman v. Lincoln

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
124 U.S. 38
Hinchman v. Lincoln
Theo. F. H. Meyer and Wayne McVeagh, for plaintiff in error.
A. C. Brown, for defendant in error.
MATTHEWS, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hinckley v. Gilman Clinton and Springfield Railroad Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
94 U.S. 467
Hinckley v. Gilman Clinton and Springfield Railroad Company
The motion to dismiss cannot be sustained.
In Blossom v. Railroad Company, 1 Wall. 655, a bidder at a foreclosure sale was allowed to appeal, and in delivering the opinion of the court Mr. Justice Miller said:--
'It is certainly true that he cannot appeal from the original decree of foreclosure, nor from any other order or decree of the court made prior to his bid. It, however, seems to be well settled, that, after a decree adjudicating certain rights between the parties to a suit, other persons having no previous interest in the litigation may become connected with the case in the course of the subsequent proceedings, in such a manner as to subject them to the jurisdiction of the court, and render them liable to its orders; and that they may in like manner acquire rights in regard to the subject-matter of the litigation, which the court is bound to protect.' This seems to us to be decisive of this motion. The receiver cannot and does not attempt to appeal from the decree of foreclosure, or from any order or decree of the court, except such as relates to the settlement of his accounts. To that extent he has been subjected to the jurisdiction of the court, and made liable to its orders and decrees. He has, therefore, the corresponding right to contend against all claims made against him. For this purpose he occupies the position of a party to the suit, although an officer of the court, and after the final decree below has the right to his appeal here. In this case, the final decree has been given, and the case is properly here upon the appeal as prayed and allowed. This will not keep any thing in litigation but the receiver's accounts. The title to the property and the possession under the sale cannot be in any manner affected. Every thing can be closed up in the court below, in accordance with the decree which has been entered in the cause, except the distribution of the money claimed from the receiver.
It will be time enough to consider whether more of the record has been brought here than is necessary to the hearing of the questions presented by the appeal when the cause is reached, or when application is made to us in that behalf.
Motion to dismiss denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hinckley v. Morton

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
103 U.S. 764
Hinckley v. Morton
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois, with which is united a motion to affirm.
Mr. R. Biddle Roberts in support of the motions.
Mr. Leonard Swett and Mr. Philip Phillips, contra.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Himno Nacional Argentino

* related portals: National anthems, Argentina.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
Himno Nacional Argentino is the national anthem of Argentina. Its lyrics were written by Vicente López y Planes, and the music was composed by Blas Parera. This song was adopted as the national anthem on 1813-05-11, three years after the "May Revolution" (Revolución de Mayo); May 11 is therefore Anthem Day in Argentina.Warning: template has been deprecated.
English-language translations of Himno Nacional Argentino include:
* "Marcha Patriótica", original version adopted in 1813.
* "Himno Nacional Argentino", abbreviated version adopted in 1924.
# Weird Tales/Volume 30/Issue 6/The Old House on the Hill

$^{The}$Old House on the Hill
By WINONA MONTGOMERY GILLILAND
From the wide valley, I looked up and saw
The house upon the hill, that I had seen
So many times before. By every law
It should have seemed, just what it long had been,
An old house that someone, with loving care,
Had painted white; at doors and windows hung
Green-painted shutters. But it had an air
Of difference, today. The wind had flung,
Or some hand closed, the shutters on the doors,
French-doors, with windows over them; the trim
Between shone white, through pines and sycamores,
To form two crosses, and my eyes grew dim.
I thought, "There is no home without its cross
Hidden about it somewhere; pain—or loss."
# Weird Tales/Volume 31/Issue 2/Ally of Stars

From Weird Tales, Volume 31, Issue 2
Ally of Stars
By IRENE WILDE
From Time's disintegrating wall I watched the regiments of moons March down the avenue of night, The flying columns and platoons Of suns receding disappear Beyond horizons of sound and sight; I heard the systems, world on world, Down battlements of darkness hurled, And saw the spheres in bright parade Demolished by the cavalcade Of doom, the nebulas undone, The constellations' slow retreat, The meteors swift oblivion… I watched from Time's low crumbling wall; I know their passwords and their signs– In uniform of yielding breath, Ally of stars, I write these lines Above the signature of Death!
# Weird Tales/Volume 31/Issue 2/Haunting Columns

From Weird Tales, Volume 31, Issue 2
Haunting Columns
By ROBERT E. HOWARD
# United States v. Weld

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
127 U.S. 51
United States v. Weld
Atty. Gen. Garland and Asst. Atty. Gen. Howard, for appellant.
S. Shellabarger and J. M. Wilson, for appellees.
LAMAR, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Weitzel

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
246 U.S. 533
United States v. Weitzel
Argued: March 7, 1918. --- Decided: April 15, 1918
[Syllabus on page 533 intentionally omitted.]
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Warren, for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 533-540 intentionally omitted]
Mr. A. E. Stricklett, of Covington, Ky., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse