OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Grimes v. Raymond Concrete Pile Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
356 U.S. 252
Grimes v. Raymond Concrete Pile Company
Argued: March 10, 1958. --- Decided: April 7, 1958
Mr. Harry Kisloff, Boston, Mass., for the petitioner.
Mr. Frank L. Kozol, Boston, Mass., for the respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Grimm's Goblins (1876)

Grimm's Goblins German Popular Stories Translated from the Kinder und Haus Marchen Collected by M. M. Grimm from oral tradition
With 24 illustrations after George Cruikshank Published by R. Meek & C$^o$ 15, Wine Office Court. Fleet S$^t$ London 1877.
GRIMM'S GOBLINS.
GRIMM'S HOUSEHOLD STORIES,
translated from the
Kinder und Haus Marchen
by
E. TAYLOR.
TWENTY-FOUR ILLUSTRATIONS AFTER
GEORGE CRUIKSHANK.
With Original Notes by E. Taylor,
&c., &c.
LONDON:
R. MEEK & CO., 15, WINE OFFICE COURT, FLEET STREET.
1876.
London: Clayton and Co., Temple Printing Works, Bouverie Street, Whitefriars.
CONTENTS.
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Gassies v. Ballon

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
31 U.S. 761
Gassies v. Ballon
ERROR to the district court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana.
This case came before the district court of the eastern district of Louisiana, on a petition filed in November 1829, by Jean Gassies Ballon, for the recovery of the proceeds of certain goods, left in the hands of his son Pierre Gassies for sale, and for a balance of an account arising out of the sale of the said goods, and other transactions between them.
The petitioner described himself in the petition as a resident of the city of Barsac, and a French citizen of the kingdom of France, and now in the parish of Baton Rouge, intending to return to France as soon as the settlement of his affairs would permit.
The defendant appeared to his son, was described 'as now residing in the parish of West Baton Rouge, where the said Pierre Gassies caused himself to be naturalized an American citizen.'
The defendant Appeared to the suit, and after a plea of no cause of action, which was overruled by the court, the cause was tried by a jury, and in February 1830, a verdict was rendered for the petitioner for three thousand one hundred dollars, for which sum the district court entered judgment in his favour.
The defendant prosecuted this writ of error.
The case was argued by Mr Taney for the plaintiff in error; and by Mr Key for the defendant.
For the plaintiff it was contended, that there was not a sufficient averment in the pleadings, that Pierre Gassies was a citizen of Louisiana, so as to sustain the jurisdiction of the district court of the United States.
The averment is, that the plaintiff in error, the defendant below, 'is now residing in the parish of West Baton Rouge, where the said Pierre Gassies caused himself to be naturalized an American citizen.' To show that this was not a sufficient description of the defendant to give the courts of the United States jurisdiction, the following cases were cited. Coxe's Digest, 434. 3 Dall. 382. 4 Dall. 11. 1 Cranch, 343. 2 Cranch, 9, 126. 5 Cranch, 303. 6 Wheat. 450.
Mr Key, for the defendant in error. The averment is, that the defendant in the district court resides in the parish of West Baton Rouge, where he has caused himself to be naturalized as an American citizen. He is then a citizen of the United States, made so by naturalization, and residing in Louisiana. This makes him a citizen of Louisiana; he became so by residing in that state. Cited, 3 Wash. C. C. R. 546. 1 Paine, 580. Gordon's Digest, 270.
Mr Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gassies v. Ballon/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
31 U.S. 761
Gassies v. Ballon
In this case the court is of opinion that the jurisdiction can be sustained. The defendant in error is alleged in the proceedings to be a citizen of the United States, naturalized in Louisiana, and residing there. This is equivalent to an averment that he is a citizen of that state. A citizen of the United States, residing in any state of the union, is a citizen of that state.
The authorities on this question have gone far enough; and this court is not disposed to narrow any more the limitations which have been imposed by the decided cases. They have gone as far as it would be reasonable and proper to go. The judgment of the district court of Louisiana is affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gast Realty Investment Company v. Schneider Granite Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
240 U.S. 55
Gast Realty Investment Company v. Schneider Granite Company
Argued: January 21, 1916. --- Decided: January 31, 1916
Messrs. Thomas G. Rutledge, Robert A. Holland, Jr., Jacob M. Lashley, and David Goldsmith for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Hickman P. Rodgers and William K. Koerner for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 56 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gastelum-Quinones v. Kennedy

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
374 U.S. 469
Gastelum-Quinones v. Kennedy
Argued: March 19, 1963. --- Decided: June 17, 1963
David Rein, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Bruce J. Terris, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice GOLDBERG delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gaskins v. McKellar/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 231, 96 S.Ct. 2909, 2973, 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976), I would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case.
Justice BLACKMUN would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari, vacate the judgment and remand the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of Yates v. Evatt, 500 U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 1884, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (1991).

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gasoline Products Company v. Champlin Refining Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
283 U.S. 494
Gasoline Products Company v. Champlin Refining Company
Argued: April 17, 1931. --- Decided: May 18, 1931
Messrs. John B. Marsh, of New York City, and Robert
Hale, of Portland, Me., for petitioner.
Mr. Horace G. McKeever, of Enid, Okl., for respondent.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gasquet v. Fenner

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
247 U.S. 16
Gasquet v. Fenner
Argued: April 24, 1918. --- Decided: May 6, 1918
Messrs. Williams Winans Wall, of New Orleans, La., G. T. Fitzhugh, of Memphis, Tenn., and Thomas Gilmore, of New Orleans, La., for appellant.
Mr. George Denegre, of New Orleans, La., for appellees.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Grimm's Goblins (1876)/The Three Sluggards

Notes
THE THREE SLUGGARDS.
The king of a country a long way off had three sons. He liked one as well as another, and did not know which to leave his kingdom to after his death: so when he was dying he called them all to him, and said, "Dear children, the laziest sluggard of the three shall be king after me." "Then," said the eldest, "the kingdom is mine; for I am so lazy that when I lie down to sleep, if anything were to fall into my eyes so that I could not shut them, I should still go on sleeping." The second said, "Father, the kingdom belongs to me; for I am so lazy that when I sit by the fire to warm myself, I would sooner have my toes burnt than take the trouble to draw my legs back." The third said, "Father, the kingdom is mine; for I am so lazy that if I were going to be hanged, with the rope round my neck, and somebody were to put a sharp knife into my hands to cut it, I had rather be hanged than raise my hand to do it." When the father heard this, he said, "You shall be the king; for you are the fittest man."
# Henry V (1918) Yale/Text

Layout 2
The Life of Henry the Fifth
* Prologue
* Act I
* Act II
* Act III
* Act IV
* Act V
[DRAMATIS PERSONÆ
King Henry the Fifth
| Duke of Gloucester, | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | Brothers to the King |
| Duke of Bedford, | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | Brothers to the King |
| Duke of Clarence, | $\scriptstyle {\left.{\begin{matrix}\ \\\\\ \\\ \ \end{matrix}}\right\}\,$ | Brothers to the King |
Duke of Exeter, Uncle to the King
Duke of York, Cousin to the King
Earls of Salisbury, Westmoreland, and Warwick
Archbishop of Canterbury
Bishop of Ely
Earl of Cambridge
Lord Scroop of Masham
Sir Thomas Grey
Bates, Court, Williams, Soldiers in the Same
Pistol, Nym, Bardolph
Boy
A Herald
Charles the Sixth, King of France
Lewis, the Dauphin
Dukes of Burgundy, Orleans, and Bourbon
The Constable of France
Rambures and Grandpré, French Lords
Montjoy, a French Herald
Governor of Harfleur
Ambassadors to the King of England
Isabel, Queen of France
Katharine, Daughter to Charles and Isabel
Alice, a Lady attending on the Princess Katharine
Chorus
Scene: England to the close of Act II. Sc. iii; afterwards France]
# Henry V (Shakespeare)

* related portals: Elizabethan drama.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, quotes, Wikidata item.
A historical play, believed to have been written circa 1599, and which is the final part of a tetralogy, referred to by some scholars as the Henriad. It is preceded by three plays concerning Henry's forbears and his youth: Richard II; Henry IV, Part 1; and Part 2.
* The Life of Henry the Fift, from a facsimile copy of the First Folio (1623) (transcription project)
* The Life of King Henry the Fifth, from The Plays of William Shakespeare, in eight volumes, vol. IV, with notes by Samuel Johnson (1765) IA
* The Life of Henry the Fifth, edited by G. C. Moore Smiith, The Warwick Shakespeare (1896) (HathiTrust)
* The Life of King Henry the Fifth, edited by Herbert Arthur Evans, The Works of Shakespeare, The Arden Shakespeare, 1st ser. (1904) IA
* The Life of King Henry the Fifth, in The Complete Works of William Shakespeare, Vol. V, Oxford edition (1911) IA
* The Life of Henry the Fifth, edited by Robert D. French, The Yale Shakespeare (1918)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago. Translations or editions published later may be copyrighted.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Henry V (1918) Yale/Text/Prologue

Layout 2
Enter Prologue.
O! for a Muse of fire, that would ascend The brightest heaven of invention; A kingdom for a stage, princes to act And monarchs to behold the swelling scene. 4 Then should the warlike Harry, like himself, Assume the port of Mars; and at his heels, Leash'd in like hounds, should famine, sword, and fire Crouch for employment. But pardon, gentles all, The flat unraised spirits that hath dar'd 9 On this unworthy scaffold to bring forth So great an object: can this cockpit hold The vasty fields of France? or may we cram 12 Within this wooden O the very casques That did affright the air at Agincourt? O, pardon! since a crooked figure may Attest in little place a million; 16 And let us, ciphers to this great accompt, On your imaginary forces work. Suppose within the girdle of these walls Are now confin'd two mighty monarchies, 20 Whose high upreared and abutting fronts The perilous narrow ocean parts asunder: Piece out our imperfections with your thoughts: Into a thousand parts divide one man, 24 And make imaginary puissance; Think when we talk of horses that you see them ​
Footnotes to the Prologue
Prologue
​6 port: bearing 9 unraised: unaspiring 10 scaffold: stage 11 cockpit; cf. n. 12 vasty: vast 13 the very casques: even the helmets 16 Attest: stand for; cf. n. 17 accompt: account 18 imaginary: imaginative 21 abutting: adjacent ​29 jumping o'er times; cf. n. 31 for . . . supply: for which service 32 Chorus; cf. n.
# Henry V (Coates)

"When Nature takes away the things we prize"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1912), as "Ode on the Coronation of King George V" in The Unconquered Air, and Other Poems (1912).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "Henry V" in Poems II.
# Henry Wadsworth Longfellow (Coates)

"If tasting Heliconian springs"
* Coates, Florence Earle (1907), "Henry Wadsworth Longfellow" in Harper's Weekly (2 March 1907).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1909), "Henry Wadsworth Longfellow" in Lyrics of Life (1909).
* Coates, Florence Earle (1916), "Henry Wadsworth Longfellow" in Poems II.
# Gladesmuir (Letitia Elizabeth Landon)

* From The Literary Gazette, September 1822
* From The Improvisatrice; and Other Poems (1824)
# Gladson v. Minnesota

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
166 U.S. 427
Gladson v. Minnesota
Emerson Hadley, for plaintiff in error.
H. W. Childs, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice GRAY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Gladiolus Rag

Middle-period classic rag by Joplin, considered by many to be his best.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Glacier Northwest v. Teamsters/Opinion of Justice Alito

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 21–1449
GLACIER NORTHWEST, INC., DBA CALPORTLAND, PETITIONER v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 174 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON [June 1, 2023]
Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas and Justice Gorsuch join, concurring in the judgment.
I agree with the Court that the Washington Supreme Court erred in holding that Glacier Northwest’s complaint is preempted under San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U. S. 236 (1959). The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects the right to strike, but that right is subject to certain limitations and qualifications, see 29 U. S. C. §163, and this Court’s decisions make clear that the Act does not protect striking employees who engage in the type of conduct alleged here.
This Court has long recognized that the Act does not “invest those who go on strike with an immunity from discharge for acts of trespass or violence against the employer’s property.” NLRB v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp., 306 U. S. 240, 255 (1939). To justify “despoiling [an employer’s] property” or “the seizure and conversion of its goods,” we have reasoned, “would be to put a premium on resort to force instead of legal remedies.” Id., at 253. It follows that Garmon preemption does not prevent States from imposing liability on employees who intentionally destroy their employer’s property. See, e.g., Machinists v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Comm’n, 427 U. S. 132, 136 (1976) (“Policing … destruction of property has been ​held most clearly a matter for the States”); Construction Workers v. Laburnum Constr. Corp., 347 U. S. 656, 669 (1954) (The NLRA does not allow employees to “destroy property without liability for the damage done”); Electrical Workers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Bd., 315 U. S. 740, 748 (1942) (The NLRA “was not designed to preclude a State” from regulating threats of property damage); see also Linn v. Plant Guard Workers, 383 U. S. 53, 61–62 (1966) (“ ‘[T]here is no ground for concluding that existing criminal penalties or liabilities for tortious conduct have been eliminated’ ” by the NLRA); Bill Johnson’s Restaurants, Inc. v. NLRB, 461 U. S. 731, 741–742 (1983) (“It has … repeatedly been held that an employer has the right to seek local judicial protection from tortious conduct during a labor dispute”).
Nothing more is needed to resolve this case. Glacier’s complaint alleges that the Union and its members acted “with the improper purpose to harm Glacier by causing [its] batched concrete to be destroyed.” App. 10; accord, id., at 14, 19–20. As the Court recognizes, they succeeded by “prompt[ing] the creation of the perishable product” and then ceasing work when the concrete was in a vulnerable state. Ante, at 10 (emphasis deleted); see App. 10–13. Because this Court has long rejected the Union’s claim that this kind of conduct is protected, Garmon preemption does not apply. See Longshoremen v. Davis, 476 U. S. 380, 395 (1986).
# Fitzgerald v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
374 U.S. 16
Fitzgerald v. United States
Argued: April 18, 1963. --- Decided: June 10, 1963
Theodore H. Friedman, New York City, for petitioner.
Matthew L. Danahar, New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fitzgerald Construction Company v. Pedersen

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
324 U.S. 720
Fitzgerald Construction Company v. Pedersen
Argued: Feb. 5, 1945. --- Decided: April 9, 1945
Mr. Henry E. Foley, of Boston, Mass., for petitioner.
Mr. Wm. E. J. Connor, of Hudson, N.Y., for respondent.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fitzgerald v. Green

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
134 U.S. 377
Fitzgerald v. Green
R. A. Ayers and J. Randolph Tucker, for appellant.
Mr. Justice GRAY, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fitzgerald v. United States/Dissent Harlan

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Harlan
United States Supreme Court
374 U.S. 16
Fitzgerald v. United States
Argued: April 18, 1963. --- Decided: June 10, 1963
Mr. Justice HARLAN (dissenting).
I am wholly in sympathy with the result reached by the Court. It is, I believe, a result that is consistent with sound judicial administration and that will greatly simplify the conduct of suits in which a claim for maintenance and cure is joined with a Jones Act claim arising out of the same set of facts.
But the rule that the Court announces is in my view entirely procedural in character, and the manner in which such rules must be promulgated has been specified by Congress in 28 U.S.C. § 2073. This statute provides that rules of procedure in admiralty
'shall not take effect until they have been reported to Congress by the Chief Justice at or after the beginning of a regular session thereof * * * and until the expiration of ninety days after they have been thus reported.'
Believing that we are governed by this provision, and that the method there prescribed for the declaration of procedural rules, which are to be applicable in all Federal District Courts, is exclusive, I am unable to subscribe to the opinion of the Court. I think the appropriate way to achieve what in this instance is obviously a desirable procedural reform is to deal with the matter through the Judicial Conference of the United States. Cf. Miner v. Atlass, 363 U.S. 641, 80 S.Ct. 1300, 4 L.Ed.2d 1462. Meanwhile, substantially for the reasons given in Judge Friendly's opinion, I consider that the judgment below must be affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hellas (1822)/Written on Hearing the News of the Death of Napoleon

WRITTEN ON HEARING THE NEWS OF THE DEATH OF NAPOLEON.
# Hellas (Shelley)

* "Hellas: A Lyrical Drama" (1822)
* "Hellas", in The Complete Poetical Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley (1914)
* "Hellas" in the Oxford Book of English Verse 1250-1900 (1931), edited by Arthur Quiller-Couch
* "Hellas" in the Oxford Book of English Verse 1250-1918 (1940), edited by Arthur Quiller-Couch
# Hellas (1822)

HELLAS
A LYRICAL DRAMA
BY
PERCY B. SHELLEY
LONDON
CHARLES AND JAMES OLLIER VERE STREET
BOND STREET
MDCCCXXΙΙ
Pisa, November 1st, 1821.
* Preface
* Dramatis Personæ
* Hellas: A Lyrical Drama
* Notes
* Written on Hearing the News of the Death of Napoleon
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hellas (1822)/Dramatis Personæ

HELLAS.
# Hellenic Lines Limited v. Rhoditis

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    II
United States Supreme Court
398 U.S. 306
Hellenic Lines Limited v. Rhoditis
Argued: April 21, 1970. --- Decided: June 8, 1970
See 91 S.Ct. 23.
James M. Estabrook, New York City, for petitioners.
Joseph B. Stahl, New Orleans, La., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hellas

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Hellas."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
Hellas is a transliteration of Greek Ἡλλας "Greece".
* Hellas, a lyrical drama by Percy Bysshe Shelley (1822)
* Hellas, a cultural survey by Friedrich Jacobs, transl. by John Oxenford (1855) (external scan)
* Hellas: her Monuments and Scenery, by Thomas Chase (1863) (external scan)
* “Hellas”, in Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, 1870

## See also

* Greece