# Hague I (1899)

Pacific Settlement of International Disputes (Hague I); 29 July 1899. Entry into Force: 4 September 1900. This is the official United States government translation published in the first volume of the United States Treaty Series (Bevans).
PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES (HAGUE, I)
* Convention signed at The Hague July 29, 1899
* Senate advice and consent to ratification February 5, 1900
* Ratified by the President of the United States, with a reservation, April 7, 1900
* Procès-verbal of first deposit of ratifications (including that of the United States) at The Hague dated September 4, 1900
* Entered into force September 4, 1900
* Proclaimed by the President of the United States November 1, 1901
* Replaced by convention of October 18, 1907, on the same subject, as between contracting parties to the later convention
32 Stat. 1779; Treaty Series 392
[TRANSLATION]
Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes
His Majesty the Emperor of Germany, King of Prussia; His Majesty the Emperor of Austria, King of Bohemia etc. and Apostolic King of Hungary; His Majesty the King of the Belgians; His Majesty the Emperor of China; His Majesty the King of Denmark; His Majesty the King of Spain and in His Name Her Majesty the Queen-Regent of the Kingdom; the President of the United States of America; the President of the United Mexican States; the President of the French Republic; Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, Empress of India; His Majesty the King of the Hellenes; His Majesty the King of Italy; His Majesty the Emperor of Japan; His Royal Highness the Grand Duke of Luxemburg, Duke of Nassau; His Highness the Prince of Montenegro; Her Majesty the Queen of the Netherlands; His Imperial Majesty the Shah of Persia; His Majesty the King of Portugal and of the Algarves etc.; His Majesty the King of Roumania; His Majesty the Emperor of all the Russias; His Majesty the King of Servia; His Majesty the King of Siam; His Majesty the King of Sweden and Norway; the Swiss Federal Council; His Majesty the Emperor of the Ottomans and His Royal Highness the Prince of Bulgaria
​Animated by a strong desire to concert for the maintenance of the general peace;
Resolved to second by their best efforts the friendly settlement of international disputes;
Recognizing the solidarity which unites the members of the society of civilized nations;
Desirous of extending the empire of law, and of strengthening the appreciation of international justice;
Convinced that the permanent institution of a Court of Arbitration, accessible to all, in the midst of the independent Powers, will contribute effectively to this result;
Having regard to the advantages attending the general and regular organization of arbitral procedure;
Sharing the opinion of the august Initiator of the International Peace Conference that it is expedient to record in an international Agreement the principles of equity and right on which are based the security of States and the welfare of peoples;
Being desirous of concluding a Convention to this effect, have appointed as their plenipotentiaries, to wit:
His Majesty the Emperor of Germany, King of Prussia:
His Excellency Count de Münster, Prince of Derneburg, His Ambassador at Paris.
His Majesty the Emperor of Austria, King of Bohemia etc., and Apostolic King of Hungary:
His Excellency Count R. de Welsersheimb, His Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary.
Mr. Alexander Okolicsanyi d'Okolicsna, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at The Hague.
His Majesty the King of the Belgians:
His Excellency Mr. Auguste Beernaert, His Minister of State, President of the Chamber of Representatives.
Count De Grelle Rogier, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at The Hague.
The Chevalier Descamps, Senator.
His Majesty the Emperor of China:
Mr. Yang Yü, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at St. Petersburg.
His Majesty the King of Denmark:
His Chamberlain Fr. E. de Bille, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at London.
​His Majesty the King of Spain and in His Name, Her Majesty the Queen-Regent of the Kingdom:
His Excellency the Duke of Tetuan, formerly Minister of Foreign Affairs.
Mr. W. Ramirez de Villa Urrutia, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at Brussels.
Mr. Arthur de Baguer, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at The Hague.
The President of the United States of America:
His Excellency Mr. Andrew D. White, Ambassador of the United States at Berlin.
Mr. Seth Low, President of Columbia University, New York.
Mr. Stanford Newel, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at The Hague.
Captain Alfred T. Mahan.
Captain William Crozier.
The President of the United Mexican States:
Mr. de Mier, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at Paris.
Mr. Zenil, Minister Resident at Brussels.
The President of the French Republic:
Mr. Léon Bourgeois, formerly President of the Council, formerly Minister of Foreign Affairs, Member of the Chamber of Deputies.
Mr. Georges Bihourd, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at The Hague.
The Baron d'Estournelles de Constant, Minister Plenipotentiary, Member of the Chamber of Deputies.
Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, Empress of India:
His Excellency the Right Honorable Baron Pauncefote of Preston, Member of Her Majesty's Privy Council, Her Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary at Washington.
Sir Henry Howard, Her Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at The Hague.
His Majesty the King of the Hellenes:
Mr. N. Delyanni, formerly President of the Council, formerly Minister of Foreign Affairs, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at Paris.
His Majesty the King of Italy:
His Excellency Count Nigra, His Ambassador at Vienna, Senator of the Kingdom.
Count A. Zannini, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at The Hague.
Commander Guido Pompilj, Deputy in the Italian Parliament.
​His Majesty the Emperor of Japan:
Mr. I. Motono, His Envoy Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary at Brussels.
His Royal Highness the Grand Duke of Luxemburg, Duke of Nassau:
His Excellency Mr. Eyschen, His Minister of State, President of the Grand Ducal Government.
His Highness the Prince of Montenegro:
His Excellency the present Privy Councillor De Staal, Ambassador of Russia at London.
Her Majesty the Queen of the Netherlands:
Jonkheer A. P. C. van Karnebeek, formerly Minister of Foreign Affairs, Member of the Second Chamber of the States-General.
General J. C. C. den Beer Poortugael, formerly Minister of War, Member of the Council of State.
Mr. T. M. C. Asser, Member of the Council of State.
Mr. E. N. Rahusen, Member of the First Chamber of the States-General.
His Imperial Majesty the Shah of Persia:
His Aid-de-Camp General Mirza Riza Khan, Arfa-ud-Dovleh, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at St. Petersburg and at Stockholm.
His Majesty the King of Portugal and of the Algarves, etc.:
Count de Macedo, Peer of the Kingdom, formerly Minister of the Navy and of the Colonies, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at Madrid.
Mr. d'Ornellas de Vasconcellos, Peer of the Kingdom, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at St. Petersburg.
Count de Selir, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at The Hague.
His Majesty the King of Roumania:
Mr. Alexander Beldiman, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at Berlin.
Mr. Jean N. Papiniu, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at The Hague.
His Majesty the Emperor of All the Russias:
His Excellency the present Privy Councillor De Staal, His Ambassador at London.
Mr. de Martens, Permanent Member of the Council of the Imperial Ministry of Foreign Affairs, His Privy Councillor.
His present Councillor of State De Basily, Chamberlain, Director of the First Department of the Imperial Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
​His Majesty the King of Servia:
Mr. Miyatovitch, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at London and at The Hague.
His Majesty the King of Siam:
Phya Suriya Nuvatr, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at St. Petersburg and at Paris.
Phya Visuddha Suriyasakti, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at The Hague and at London.
His Majesty the King of Sweden and Norway:
Baron de Bildt, His Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at Rome.
The Swiss Federal Council:
Dr. Arnold Roth, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary at Berlin.
His Majesty the Emperor of the Ottomans:
His Excellency Turkhan Pacha, Formerly Minister of Foreign Affairs, Member of His Council of State.
Noury Bey, Secretary-General at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
His Royal Highness the Prince of Bulgaria:
Dr. Dimitri Stancioff, Diplomatic Agent at St. Petersburg.
Major Christo Hessaptchieff, Military Attaché at Belgrade.
Who, after communication of their full powers, found in good and due form, have agreed on the following provisions:
Title I. On the Maintenance of the General Peace
Article 1
With a view to obviating, as far as possible, recourse to force in the relations between States, the Signatory Powers agree to use their best efforts to insure the pacific settlement of international differences.
Title II. On Good Offices and Mediation
Article 2
In case of serious disagreement or conflict, before an appeal to arms, the Signatory Powers agree to have recourse, as far as circumstances allow, to the good offices or mediation of one or more friendly Powers.
Article 3
Independently of this recourse, the Signatory Powers recommend that one or more Powers, strangers to the dispute, should, on their own initiative, and ​as far as circumstances may allow, offer their good offices or mediation to the States at variance.
Powers, strangers to the dispute, have the right to offer good offices or mediation, even during the course of hostilities.
The exercise of this right can never be regarded by one or the other of the parties in conflict as an unfriendly act.
Article 4
The part of the mediator consists in reconciling the opposing claims and appeasing the feelings of resentment which may have arisen between the States at variance.
Article 5
The functions of the mediator are at an end when once it is declared, either by one of the parties to the dispute, or by the mediator himself, that the means of reconciliation proposed by him are not accepted.
Article 6
Good offices and mediation, either at the request of the parties at variance, or on the initiative of Powers strangers to the dispute, have exclusively the character of advice and never have binding force.
Article 7
The acceptance of mediation can not, unless there be an agreement to the contrary, have the effect of interrupting, delaying, or hindering mobilization or other measures of preparation for war.
If mediation occurs after the commencement of hostilities it causes no interruption to the military operations in progress, unless there be an agreement to the contrary.
Article 8
The Signatory Powers are agreed in recommending the application, when circumstances allow, of special mediation in the following form:
In case of a serious difference endangering the peace, the States at variance choose respectively a Power, to whom they intrust the mission of entering into direct communication with the Power chosen on the other side, with the object of preventing the rupture of pacific relations.
For the period of this mandate, the term of which, unless otherwise stipulated, cannot exceed thirty days, the States in conflict cease from all direct communication on the subject of the dispute, which is regarded as referred exclusively to the mediating Powers, who must use their best efforts to settle it.
In case of a definite rupture of pacific relations, these Powers are charged with the joint task of taking advantage of any opportunity to restore peace.
TITLE III. On International Commissions of Inquiry
Article 9
In differences of an international nature involving neither honour nor vital interests, and arising from a difference of opinion on points of fact, the Signatory Powers recommend that the parties, who have not been able to come to an agreement by means of diplomacy, should as far as circumstances allow, institute an International Commission of Inquiry, to facilitate a solution of these differences by elucidating the facts by means of an impartial and conscientious investigation.
Article 10
The International Commissions of Inquiry are constituted by special agreement between the parties in conflict.
The Convention for an inquiry defines the facts to be examined and the extent of the Commissioners' powers.
It settles the procedure.
On the inquiry both sides must be heard.
The form and the periods to be observed, if not stated in the inquiry Convention, are decided by the Commission itself.
Article 11
The International Commissions of Inquiry are formed, unless otherwise stipulated, in the manner fixed by Article 32 of the present convention.
Article 12
The powers in dispute engage to supply the International Commission of Inquiry, as fully as they may think possible, with all means and facilities necessary to enable it to be completely acquainted with and to accurately understand the facts in question.
Article 13
The International Commission of Inquiry communicates its Report to the conflicting Powers, signed by all the members of the Commission.
Article 14
The report of the International Commission of Inquiry is limited to a statement of facts, and has in no way the character of an Arbitral Award. It leaves the conflicting Powers entire freedom as to the effect to be given to this statement.
TITLE IV. On International Arbitration
Chapter I. On the System of Arbitration
Article 15
International arbitration has for its object the settlement of differences between States by judges of their own choice, and on the basis of respect for law.
Article 16
In questions of a legal nature, and especially in the interpretation or application of International Conventions, arbitration is recognized by the Signatory Powers as the most effective, and at the same time the most equitable, means of settling disputes which diplomacy has failed to settle.
Article 17
The Arbitration Convention is concluded for questions already existing or for questions which may arise eventually.
It may embrace any dispute or only disputes of a certain category.
Article 18
The Arbitration Convention implies the engagement to submit loyally to the Award.
Article 19
Independently of general or private Treaties expressly stipulating recourse to arbitration as obligatory on the Signatory Powers, these Powers reserve to themselves the right of concluding, either before the ratification of the present Act or later, new Agreements, general or private, with a view to extending obligatory arbitration to all cases which they may consider it possible to submit to it.
Chapter II. On the Permanent Court of Arbitration
Article 20
With the object of facilitating an immediate recourse to arbitration for international differences, which it has not been possible to settle by diplomacy, the Signatory Powers undertake to organize a permanent Court of Arbitration, accessible at all times and operating, unless otherwise stipulated by the parties, in accordance with the Rules of Procedure inserted in the present Convention.
Article 21
The Permanent Court shall be competent for all arbitration cases, unless the parties agree to institute a special Tribunal.
Article 22
An International Bureau, established at The Hague, serves as record office for the Court.
This Bureau is the channel for communications relative to the meetings of the Court.
It has the custody of the archives and conducts all the administrative business.
The Signatory Powers undertake to communicate to the International Bureau at The Hague a duly certified copy of any conditions of arbitration ​arrived at between them, and of any award concerning them delivered by special Tribunals.
They undertake also to communicate to the Bureau the Laws, Regulations, and documents eventually showing the execution of the awards given by the Court.
Article 23
Within the three months following its ratification of the present Act, each Signatory Power shall select four persons at the most, of known competency in questions of international law, of the highest moral reputation, and disposed to accept the duties of Arbitrators.
The persons thus selected shall be inscribed, as members of the Court, in a list which shall be notified by the Bureau to all the Signatory Powers.
Any alteration in the list of Arbitrators is brought by the Bureau to the knowledge of the Signatory Powers.
Two or more Powers may agree on the selection in common of one or more Members.
The same person can be selected by different Powers.
The Members of the Court are appointed for a term of six years. Their appointments can be renewed.
In case of the death or retirement of a member of the Court, his place shall be filled in accordance with the method of his appointment.
Article 24
When the Signatory Powers desire to have recourse to the Permanent Court for the settlement of a difference that has arisen between them, the Arbitrators called upon to form the competent Tribunal to decide this difference, must be chosen from the general list of members of the Court.
Failing the direct agreement of the parties on the composition of the Arbitration Tribunal, the following course shall be pursued:
Each party appoints two Arbitrators, and these together choose an Umpire.
If the votes are equal, the choice of the Umpire is intrusted to a third Power, selected by the parties by common accord.
If an agreement is not arrived at on this subject, each party selects a different Power, and the choice of the Umpire is made in concert by the Powers thus selected.
The Tribunal being thus composed, the parties notify to the Bureau their determination to have recourse to the Court and the names of the Arbitrators.
The Tribunal of Arbitration assembles on the date fixed by the parties.
The Members of the Court, in the discharge of their duties and out of their own country, enjoy diplomatic privileges and immunities.
Article 25
The Tribunal of Arbitration has its ordinary seat at The Hague.
Except in cases of necessity, the place of session can only be altered by the Tribunal with the assent of the parties.
Article 26
The International Bureau at The Hague is authorized to place its premises and its staff at the disposal of the Signatory Powers for the operations of any special Board of Arbitration.
The jurisdiction of the Permanent Court, may, within the conditions laid down in the Regulations, be extended to disputes between non-Signatory Powers, or between Signatory Powers and non-Signatory Powers, if the parties are agreed on recourse to this Tribunal.
Article 27
The Signatory Powers consider it their duty, if a serious dispute threatens to break out between two or more of them, to remind these latter that the Permanent Court is open to them.
Consequently, they declare that the fact of reminding the conflicting parties of the provisions of the present Convention, and the advice given to them, in the highest interests of peace, to have recourse to the Permanent Court, can only be regarded as friendly actions.
Article 28
A Permanent Administrative Council, composed of the Diplomatic Representatives of the Signatory Powers accredited to The Hague and of the Netherland Minister for Foreign Affairs, who will act as President, shall be instituted in this town as soon as possible after the ratification of the present Act by at least nine Powers.
This Council will be charged with the establishment and organization of the International Bureau, which will be under its direction and control.
It will notify to the Powers the constitution of the Court and will provide for its installation.
It will settle its Rules of Procedure and all other necessary Regulations.
It will decide all questions of administration which may arise with regard to the operations of the Court.
It will have entire control over the appointment, suspension or dismissal of the officials and employés of the Bureau.
It will fix the payments and salaries, and control the general expenditure.
At meetings duly summoned the presence of five members is sufficient to render valid the discussions of the Council. The decisions are taken by a majority of votes.
The Council communicates to the Signatory Powers without delay the Regulations adopted by it. It furnishes them with an annual Report on the labours of the Court, the working of the administration, and the expenses.
Article 29
The expenses of the Bureau shall be borne by the Signatory Powers in the proportion fixed for the International Bureau of the Universal Postal Union.
Chapter III. On Arbitral Procedure
Article 30
With a view to encourage the development of arbitration, the Signatory Powers have agreed on the following Rules which shall be applicable to arbitral procedure, unless other rules have been agreed on by the parties.
Article 31
The Powers who have recourse to arbitration sign a special Act (compromis), in which the subject of the difference is clearly defined, as well as the extent of the Arbitrators' powers. This Act implies the undertaking of the parties to submit loyally to the award.
Article 32
The duties of Arbitrator may be conferred on one Arbitrator alone or on several Arbitrators selected by the parties as they please, or chosen by them from the members of the permanent Court of Arbitration established by the present Act.
Failing the constitution of the Tribunal by direct agreement between the parties, the following course shall be pursued:
Each party appoints two arbitrators, and these latter together choose an Umpire.
In case of equal voting, the choice of the Umpire is intrusted to a third Power, selected by the parties by common accord.
If no agreement is arrived at on this subject, each party selects a different Power, and the choice of the Umpire is made in concert by the Powers thus selected.
Article 33
When a Sovereign or the Chief of a State is chosen as Arbitrator, the arbitral procedure is settled by him.
Article 34
The Umpire is by right President of the Tribunal.
When the Tribunal does not include an Umpire it appoints its own President.
Article 35
In case of the death, retirement, or disability from any cause of one of the Arbitrators, his place shall be filled in accordance with the method of his appointment.
Article 36
The Tribunal's place of session is selected by the parties. Failing this selection the Tribunal sits at The Hague.
The place thus fixed cannot, except in case of necessity, be changed by the Tribunal without the assent of the parties.
Article 37
The parties have the right to appoint delegates or special agents to attend the Tribunal, for the purpose of serving as intermediaries between them and the Tribunal.
They are further authorized to retain, for the defense of their rights and interests before the Tribunal, counsel or advocates appointed by them for this purpose.
Article 38
The Tribunal decides on the choice of languages to be used by itself, and to be authorized for use before it.
Article 39
As a general rule the arbitral procedure comprises two distinct phases: preliminary examination and discussion.
Preliminary examination consists in the communication by the respective agents to the members of the Tribunal and to the opposite party of all printed or written Acts and of all documents containing the arguments invoked in the case. This communication shall be made in the form and within the periods fixed by the Tribunal in accordance with Article 49.
Discussion consists in the oral development before the Tribunal of the arguments of the parties.
Article 40
Every document produced by one party must be communicated to the other party.
Article 41
The discussions are under the direction of the President.
They are only public if it be so decided by the Tribunal, with the assent of the parties.
They are recorded in the procès-verbaux drawn up by the Secretaries appointed by the President. These procès-verbaux alone have an authentic character.
Article 42
When the preliminary examination is concluded, the Tribunal has the right to refuse discussion of all fresh Acts or documents which one party may desire to submit to it without the consent of the other party.
Article 43
The Tribunal is free to take into consideration fresh Acts or documents to which its attention may be drawn by the agents or counsel of the parties.
In this case, the Tribunal has the right to require the production of these Acts or documents, but is obliged to make them known to the opposite party.
Article 44
The Tribunal can, besides, require from the agents of the parties the production of all Acts, and can demand all necessary explanations. In case of refusal, the Tribunal takes note of it.
Article 45
The agents and counsel of the parties are authorized to present orally to the Tribunal all the arguments they may think expedient in defence of their case.
Article 46
They have the right to raise objections and points. The decisions of the Tribunal on those points are final, and can not form the subject of any subsequent discussion.
Article 47
The members of the Tribunal have the right to put questions to the agents and counsel of the parties, and to demand explanations from them on doubtful points.
Neither the questions put nor the remarks made by members of the Tribunal during the discussions can be regarded as an expression of opinion by the Tribunal in general, or by its members in particular.
Article 48
The Tribunal is authorized to declare its competence in interpreting the compromis as well as the other Treaties which may be invoked in the case, and in applying the principles of international law.
Article 49
The Tribunal has the right to issue Rules of Procedure for the conduct of the case, to decide the forms and periods within which each party must conclude its arguments, and to arrange all the formalities required for dealing with the evidence.
Article 50
When the agents and counsel of the parties have submitted all explanations and evidence in support of their case, the President pronounces the discussion closed.
Article 51
The deliberations of the Tribunal take place in private. Every decision is taken by a majority of members of the Tribunal.
The refusal of a member to vote must be recorded in the procès-verbal.
Article 52
The award, given by a majority of votes, is accompanied by a statement of reasons. It is drawn up in writing and signed by each member of the Tribunal.
Those members who are in the minority may record their dissent when signing.
Article 53
The award is read out at a public meeting of the Tribunal, the agents and counsel of the parties being present, or duly summoned to attend.
Article 54
The award, duly pronounced and notified to the agents of the parties at variance, puts an end to the dispute definitively and without appeal.
Article 55
The parties can reserve in the compromis the right to demand the revision of the award.
In this case, and unless there be an agreement to the contrary, the demand must be addressed to the Tribunal which pronounced the award. It can only be made on the ground of the discovery of some new fact calculated to exercise a decisive influence on the award, and which, at the time the discussion was closed, was unknown to the Tribunal and to the party demanding the revision.
Proceedings for revision can only be instituted by a decision of the Tribunal expressly recording the existence of the new fact, recognizing in it the character described in the foregoing paragraph, and declaring the demand admissible on this ground.
The compromis fixes the period within which the demand for revision must be made.
Article 56
The award is only binding on the parties who concluded the compromis.
When there is a question of interpreting a Convention to which Powers other than those concerned in the dispute are parties, the latter notify to the former the compromis they have concluded. Each of these Powers has the right to intervene in the case. If one or more of them avail themselves of this right, the interpretation contained in the award is equally binding on them.
Article 57
Each party pays its own expenses and an equal share of those of the Tribunal.
General provisions
Article 58
The present Convention shall be ratified as speedily as possible.
The ratifications shall be deposited at The Hague.
A procès-verbal shall be drawn up recording the receipt of each ratification, and a copy duly certified shall be sent, through the diplomatic channel, to all the Powers who were represented at the International Peace Conference at The Hague.
Article 59
The non-Signatory Powers who were represented at the International Peace Conference can adhere to the present Convention. For this purpose they must make known their adhesion to the Contracting Powers by a written notification addressed to the Netherlands Government, and communicated by it to all the other Contracting Powers.
Article 60
The conditions on which the Powers who were not represented at the International Peace Conference can adhere to the present Convention shall form the subject of a subsequent Agreement among the Contracting Powers.
Article 61
In the event of one of the High Contracting Parties denouncing the present Convention, this denunciation would not take effect until a year after its notification made in writing to the Netherlands Government, and by it communicated at once to all the other Contracting Powers.
This denunciation shall only affect the notifying Power.
In faith of which the Plenipotentiaries have signed the present Convention and affixed their seals to it.
Done at The Hague, the 29th July, 1899, in a single copy, which shall remain in the archives of the Netherlands Government, and copies of it, duly certified, be sent through the diplomatic channel to the Contracting Powers.
* For Germany:
** Munster Derneburg[seal]
* For Austria-Hungary:
** Welsersmeimb[seal]
** Okoligsanyi[seal]
* For Belgium:
** A. Beernaert[seal]
** Cte. de Grelle Rogier[seal]
** Chr. Descamps[seal]
* For China:
** Yang Yu[seal]
* For Denmark:
** F. Bille[seal]
* For Spain:
** Ei. Duque de Tetuan[seal]
** W. R. de Villa Urrutia[seal]
** Arturo de Baguer[seal]
* For the United States of America:
** Andrew D. White[seal]
** Seth Low[seal]
** Stanford Newel[seal]
** A. T. Mahan[seal]
** William Crozier[seal]
* Under reserve of the declaration made at the plenary sitting of the Conference on the 25th of July, 1899.
* For the United Mexican States:
** A. de Mier[seal]
** J. Zenil[seal]
* For France:
** Léon Bourgeois[seal]
** G. Bihourd[seal]
** d'Estournelles de Constant[seal]
* For Great Britain and Ireland:
** Pauncefote[seal]
** Henry Howard[seal]
* For Greece
** N. Delyanni[seal]
* For Italy:
** Nigra[seal]
** A. Zannini[seal]
** G. Pompilj[seal]
* For Japan:
** I. Motono[seal]
* For Luxemburg:
** Eyschen[seal]
* For Montenegro:
** Staal[seal]
* For the Netherlands:
** v. Karnebeek[seal]
** den Beer Poortugael[seal]
** T. M. C. Asser[seal]
** E. N. Rahusen[seal]
* For Persia:
** Mirza Riza Khan, Arfa-ud-Dovleh[seal]
* For Portugal:
** Conde de Macedo[seal]
** Agostinho d'Ornellas de Vasconcellos[seal]
** Conde de Selir[seal]
* For Roumania:
** A. Beldiman[seal]
** J. N. Papiniu[seal]
* Under the reserves formulated in Articles 16, 17 and 19 of the present Convention (15, 16 and 18 of the project presented by the Committee on Examination) and recorded in the procès-verbal of the sitting of the Third Commission of July 20, 1899.
* For Russia:
** Staal[seal]
** Martens[seal]
** A. Basily[seal]
* For Servia:
** Chedo Miyatovitch[seal]
* Under the reserves recorded in the procès-verbal of the Third Commission of July 20, 1899.
* For Siam:
** Phya Suriya Nuvatr[seal]
** Visuddha[seal]
* For the United Kingdoms of Sweden and Norway:
** Bildt[seal]
* For Switzerland:
** Roth[seal]
* For Turkey:
** Turkhan[seal]
** Mehemed Noury[seal]
* Under reserve of the declaration made in the plenary sitting of the Conference of July 25, 1899.
* For Bulgaria:
** D. Stancioff[seal]
** Major Hessaptchieff[seal]
* ↑ For text of U.S. reservation, made at time of signature and maintained in the President's ratification, see footnote 4, p. 245.
* ↑ TS 536, post, p. 577.
* ↑ For arrangement enabling states not represented at the First Peace Conference of 1899 to adhere to the present convention, see protocol of June 14, 1907, post, p. 575. The Administrative Council of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, at its meeting on Mar. 3, 1960, having consulted all parties to the Hague conventions on pacific settlement of international disputes, in conformity with provisions of article 60, decided that after Mar. 15, 1960, the Netherlands Government would invite members of the United Nations which did not participate in the activities of the Permanent Court of Arbitration to declare (1) whether they considered themselves as contracting parties to the 1899 or 1907 Hague conventions on pacific settlement, or, if this were not the case, (2) whether they were willing to adhere to these conventions or to one of them. Several members of the United Nations responded to the invitation.
* ↑ Text of U.S. reservation (maintained at ratification): "Nothing contained in this convention shall be so construed as to require the United States of America to depart from its traditional policy of not intruding upon, interfering with, or entangling itself in the political questions of policy or internal administration of any foreign state; nor shall anything contained in the said convention be construed to imply a relinquishment by the United States of America of its traditional attitude toward purely American questions."
* ↑ Text (translation) of Romanian reservations (maintained at ratification): "The Royal Government of Roumania, being completely in favor of the principle of facultative arbitration, of which it appreciates the great importance in international relations, nevertheless does not intend to undertake, by Article 15 [art. 16 of convention], an engagement to accept arbitration in every case there provided for, and it believes it ought to form express reservations in that respect. "It can not therefore vote for this article, except under that reservation. "The Royal Government of Roumania declares that it can not adhere to Article 16 [art. 17 of convention] except with the express reservation, entered in the procès-verbal, that it has decided not to accept, in any case, an international arbitration for disagreements or disputes previous to the conclusion of the present Convention. "The Royal Government of Roumania declares that in adhering to Article 18 [art. 19] of the Convention, it makes no engagement in regard to obligatory arbitration."
* ↑ Text (translation) of Serbian reservations (maintained at ratification): "In the name of the Royal Government of Servia, we have the honor to declare that our adoption of the principle of good offices and mediation does not imply a recognition of the right of third States to use these means except with the extreme reserve which proceedings of this delicate nature require. "We do not admit good offices and mediation except on condition that their character of purely friendly counsel is maintained fully and completely, and we never could accept them in forms and circumstances such as to impress upon them the character of intervention."
* ↑ Text (translation) of Turkish reservation (does not appear in instrument of ratification): "The Turkish delegation, considering that the work of this Conference has been a work of high loyalty and humanity, destined solely to assure general peace by safeguarding the interests and the rights of each one, declares, in the name of its Government, that it adheres to the project just adopted, on the following conditions: "1. It is formally understood that recourse to good offices and mediation, to commissions of inquiry and arbitration is purely facultative and could not in any case assume an obligatory character or degenerate into intervention; "2. The Imperial Government itself will be the judge of the cases where its interests would permit it to admit these methods without its abstention or refusal to have recourse to them being considered by the signatory States as an unfriendly act. "It goes without saying that in no case could the means in question be applied to questions concerning interior regulation."
Footnotes
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse