OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Vorhees v. John T. Noye Manufacturing Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
151 U.S. 135
Vorhees v. John T. Noye Manufacturing Company

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Voris v. Eikel

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
346 U.S. 328
Voris v. Eikel
Argued: Oct. 14, 1953. --- Decided: Nov 9, 1953
Mr. Murray L. Schwartz, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. John R. Brown, Houston, Tex., for respondents.
Mr. Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Vortigern and Rowena

Vortigern and Rowena is one of the most famous Shakespeare forgeries. Written by William Henry Ireland, it was quickly found to be a fake. Its first performance was on the 2nd of April 1796, and it was played again 2008 and 2013, the former portraying it in a comedic way. The titular characters are real British historical people.
    Warning: template has been deprecated.
DRAMATIS PERSONAE (Persons Represented):
    CONSTANTIUS.
    AURELIUS.
    UTER.
    VORTIGERN.
    WORTIMERUS.
    CATAGRINUS.
    PASCENTIUS.
    HENGIST.
    HORSUS.
    FOOL.
    SERVANT.
    PAGE.
    Barons, Officers, Guards, &c., &c.
    EDMUNDA.
    FLAVIA.
    ROWENA.
    Attendants on Edmunda
SCENE: Various locations in Britain.
* Act I
* Act II
* Act III
* Act IV
* Act V
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Valdes v. Altagracia

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
225 U.S. 58
Valdes v. Altagracia
Argued: March 6, 1912. --- Decided: May 27, 1912
Messrs. F. Kingsbury Curtis, Hugo Kohlmann, and Martin Travieso, Jr., for Valdes.
Messrs. N. B. K. Pettingill and Frederick L. Cornwell for Central Altagracia.
Mr. Francis H. Dexter for Nevers & Callaghan.
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Valdes v. Larrinaga

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
233 U.S. 705
Valdes v. Larrinaga
Argued: May 4, 1914. --- Decided: May 25, 1914
Death of Ramon Valdes, appellant herein, suggested, and appearance of Ramon Valdes Cobian filed and entered February 24, 1914, as party appellant herein.
Messrs. Hugo Kohlmann, F. Kingsbury Curtis, and Martin Tracieso, Jr., for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 706-708 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney and Edward S. Paine for appellee.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walker v. Randolph

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 773
Walker v. Randolph
Walker, pro se.
William G. Clark, Atty. Gen. of Illinois, for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Willamson County, Illinois.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walker v. Reister

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
102 U.S. 467
Walker v. Reister
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Nathaniel Myers for the appellant.
Mr. James O. Broadhead, contra.
MR. JUSTICE MILLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walker v. Pennsylvania

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
127 U.S. 699
Walker v. Pennsylvania
D. T. Watson, for plaintiffs in error.
Wayne MacVeagh and W. S. Kirkpatrick, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.
HARLAN, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walker v. Pennsylvania/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
127 U.S. 699
Walker v. Pennsylvania
The questions presented in this case do not differ, in any material respect, from those determined in Powell v. Com., ante, 992, (just decided.) The principles announced in that case necessarily require an affirmance of the judgment below. It is so ordered.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walker v. Powers

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
104 U.S. 245
Walker v. Powers
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
The case was argued by Mr. Joseph P. Wittemore for the appellants, and by Mr. William F. Cogswell for the appellees.
MR. JUSTICE MILLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walker v. Randolph/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 773
Walker v. Randolph
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walker v. Robbins

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
55 U.S. 584
Walker v. Robbins
THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Mississippi, sitting as a Court of Equity.
The facts in the case are set forth in the opinion of the court.
It was argued by Mr. Freeman, for the appellants, and Mr. Crittenden, (Attorney-General,) for the appellees.
Mr. Justice CATRON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wallace v. Anderson/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
ERROR to the Circuit Court of Ohio.
This was an information for a quo warranto, brought to try the title of the defendant to the office of principal surveyor of the Virginia military bounty lands north of the river Ohio, and between the rivers Scioto and Little Miami. The defendant had been appointed to the office by the State of Virginia, and continued to exercise its duties until the year 1818, during all which time his official acts were recognised by the United States. In that year he was removed by the Governor and Council of Virginia, and the plaintiff appointed in his place. The writ was brought, by consent of parties, to try the title to the office, waiving all questions of form, and of jurisdiction. Judgment was given in the Court below for the defendant, and the cause was brought by writ of error to this Court.
The cause was argued by Mr. Hardin, for the plaintiff, and by the Attorney-General and Mr. Scott, for the defendant. But as the cause was dismissed for want of jurisdiction, it is deemed unnecessary to insert the argument.
Mr. Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court, that a writ of quo warranto could not be maintained except at the instance of the Government, and as this writ was issued by a private individual, without the authority of the Government, it could not be sustained, whatever might be the right of the prosecutor, or of the person claiming to exercise the office in question.
The formation must, therefore, be dismissed.
Judgment reversed.
JUDGMENT. This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record of the Circuit Court for the district of Ohio, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, this Court is of opinion, that no writ of quo warranto can be maintained, but at the instance of the Government; and as this is a writ issued by an individual without the authority of Government, it is the opinion of this Court, that the same cannot be sustained, whatever may be the right of that individual, or of the person who claims to exercise the office, to try the title to which, the writ is brought. It is, therefore, the opinion of this Court, that the judgment of the Circuit Court ought to be reversed, and the cause remanded to that Court, with directions to dismiss the information because it is not filed at the instance of the United States.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wallace v. Cutten

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Wallace v. Cutten, 298 U.S. 229 (1936), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the authority of the United States Secretary of Agriculture under the Grain Futures Act (298 U.S. 229, 235) was limited to prevent continued violation of the act, not past violations. Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
298 U.S. 229
Wallace v. Cutten
Argued: April 27, 1936. --- Decided: May 18, 1936
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Wendell Berge, of Washington, D.C., for petitioners.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 230-233 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wallace v. Anderson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
18 U.S. 291
Wallace v. Anderson

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wallace v. Hines

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
253 U.S. 66
Wallace v. Hines
Argued: April 21, 1920. --- Decided: May 3, 1920
Mr. F. E. Packard, of Bismarck, N. D., for appellants.
Mr. E. Marvin Underwood, of Washington, D.C., for appellee Hines.
Mr. Charles W. Bunn, of St. Paul, Minn., for appellees railway companies.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wallace v. Jaffree

Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38 (1985), was a United States Supreme Court case deciding on the issue of silent school prayer. Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Concurring Opinions

    Powell
    O'Connor

## Dissenting Opinions

    Rehnquist
    Burger
    White
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
472 U.S. 38
Wallace v. Jaffree
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ‘ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

## Footnotes

* ↑ Together with No. 83-929, Smith et al. v. Jaffree et al., also on appeal from the same court.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wallace v. Child

Thomas Wallace versus Child and Styles.
Suit on a Policy of Insurance. It was set forth in the Declaration that the Vessel sprung a Leak at Sea, and put into Providence, through Necessity.—The Master of the Ship was produced by the Plaintiff as a Witness to prove the Bill of Lading, and to give a general Account of the Transactions on board the Vessel and at Providence. His admission was opposed, because the Captain himself had Goods on board which were insured, and the Money was refused to be paid by the Underwriters on his Policy till this Suit was determined, and therefore he was interested.—But it was answered, that the Master of the Ship was the only Person who can be supposed capable of giving a full Account of the Matter; and part of the Defence in this Case being, that the Goods insured were innumerated Commodities and therefore not lawful to be shipt from Carolina to Madeira; and the Captain’s Goods insured, were not to be landed at Madeira, but at London, therefore the Captain’s Insurace could not be affected by an Determination in this Case.
The Court ruled, that he should be examined on the Voire dire, and if he said he was disinterested, he should be sworn in chief; which was done, and he was admitted a Witness.
# War is Kind & Other Lines/Each small gleam was a voice

Each small gleam was a voice, A lantern voice -- In little songs of carmine, violet, green, gold. A chorus of colours came over the water; The wondrous leaf-shadow no longer wavered, No pines crooned on the hills, The blue night was elsewhere a silence, When the chorus of colours came over the water, Little songs of carmine, violet, green, gold.
Small glowing pebbles Thrown on the dark plane of evening Sing good ballads of God And eternity, with soul's rest. Little priests, little holy fathers, None can doubt the truth of your hymning, When the marvellous chorus comes over the water, Songs of carmine, violet, green, gold.
# War is Kind & Other Lines/I explain the silvered passing of a ship at night

I explain the silvered passing of a ship at night, The sweep of each sad lost wave The dwindling boom of the steel thing's striving The little cry of a man to a man A shadow falling across the greyer night And the sinking of the small star.
Then the waste, the far waste of waters And the soft lashing of black waves For long and in loneliness.
Remember, thou, O ship of love, Thou leavest a far waste of waters And the soft lashing of black waves For long and in loneliness.
# War is Kind & Other Lines/On the desert

On the desert A silence from the moon's deepest valley. Fire rays fall athwart the robes Of hooded men, squat and dumb. Before them, a woman Moves to the blowing of shrill whistles And distant thunder of drums, While mystic things, sinuous, dull with terrible colour, Sleepily fondle her body Or move at her will, swishing stealthily over the sand. The snakes whisper softly; The whispering, whispering snakes, Dreaming and swaying and staring, But always whispering, softly whispering. The wind streams from the lone reaches Of Arabia, solemn with night, And the wild fire makes shimmer of blood Over the robes of the hooded men Squat and dumb. Bands of moving bronze, emerald, yellow, Circle the throat and the arms of her, And over the sands serpents move warily Slow, menacing and submissive, Swinging to the whistles and drums, The whispering, whispering snakes, Dreaming and swaying and staring, But always whispering, softly whispering. The dignity of the accursed; The glory of slavery, despair, death, Is in the dance of the whispering snakes.
# War is Kind & Other Lines/Fast rode the knight

Fast rode the knight With spurs, hot and reeking, Ever waving an eager sword, "To save my lady!" Fast rode the knIght, And leaped from saddle to war. Men of steel flickered and gleamed Like riot of silver lights, And the gold of the knight's good banner Still waved on a castle wall. . . . . . A horse, Blowing, staggering, bloody thing, Forgotten at foot of castle wall. A horse Dead at foot of castle wall.
# War is Kind & Other Lines/In the Night

In the night Grey heavy clouds muffled the valleys, And the peaks looked toward God alone. "O Master that movest the wind with a finger, Humble, idle, futile peaks are we. Grant that we may run swiftly across the world To huddle in worship at Thy feet."
In the morning A noise of men at work came the clear blue miles, And the little black cities were apparent. "O Master that knowest the meaning of raindrops, Humble, idle, futile peaks are we. Give voice to us, we pray, O Lord, That we may sing Thy goodness to the sun."
In the evening The far valleys were sprinkled with tiny lights. "O Master, Thou that knowest the value of kings and birds, Thou hast made us humble, idle futile peaks. Thou only needest eternal patience; We bow to Thy wisdom, O Lord -- Humble, idle, futile peaks."
In the night Grey heavy clouds muffled the valleys, And the peaks looked toward God alone.
# War is Kind & Other Lines/Forth went the candid man

Forth went the candid man And spoke freely to the wind -- When he looked about him he was in a far strange country.
Forth went the candid man And spoke freely to the stars -- Yellow light tore sight from his eyes.
"My good fool," said a learned bystander, "Your operations are mad."
"You are too candid," cried the candid man, And when his stick left the head of the learned bystander It was two sticks.
# War is Kind & Other Lines/Ay, workman, make me a dream

Ay, workman, make me a dream, A dream for my love. Cunningly weave sunlight, Breezes, and flowers. Let it be of the cloth of meadows. And -- good workman -- And let there be a man walking thereon.
# War is Kind & Other Lines/Do Not Weep, Maiden, For War Is Kind

Do not weep, maiden, for war is kind. Because the lover threw wild hands toward the sky And the affrighted steed ran on alone, Do not weep. War is kind.
Hoarse, booming drums of the regiment, Little souls who thirst for fight, These men were born to drill and die. The unexplained glory flies above them, Great is the Battle-God, great, and his Kingdom - A field where a thousand corpses lie.
Do not weep, babe, for war is kind. Because your father tumbled in the yellow trenches, Raged at his breast, gulped and died, Do not weep. War is kind.
Swift blazing flag of the regiment, Eagle with crest of red and gold, These men were born to drill and die. Point for them the virtue of slaughter, Make plain to them the excellence of killing And a field where a thousand corpses lie.
Mother whose heart hung humble as a button On the bright splendid shroud of your son, Do not weep. War is kind.
# War is Kind & Other Lines/Once a man clambering to the housetops

Once a man clambering to the housetops Appealed to the heavens. With strong voice he called to the deaf spheres; A warrior's shout he raised to the suns. Lo, at last, there was a dot on the clouds, And -- at last and at last -- -- God -- the sky was filled with armies.
# War is Kind & Other Lines/The Wayfarer

    The wayfarer,
    Perceiving the pathway to truth,
    Was struck with astonishment.
    It was thickly grown with weeds.
    "Ha," he said,
    "I see that none has passed here
    In a long time."
    Later he saw that each weed
    Was a singular knife.
    "Well," he mumbled at last,
    "Doubtless there are other roads."
# United States v. American Chicle Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
256 U.S. 446
United States v. American Chicle Company
Argued: Jan. 24, 1921. --- Decided: June 1, 1921
Mr. Solicitor General Frierson, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for the United states.
Mr. Charles P. Spooner, of New York City, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice HOLMESdelivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. American Can Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
280 U.S. 412
United States v. American Can Company
Argued: Jan. 21, 1930. --- Decided: Feb 24, 1930
The Attorney General and Mr. Charles E. Hughes, Jr., Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from page 413 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Graham Sumner, of New York City, for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from page 414 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. American Bell Telephone Company (159 U.S. 548)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
159 U.S. 548
United States v. American Bell Telephone Company
Causten Browne and R. S. Taylor, for the United States.
James J. Storrow and Frederic P. Fish, for appellees.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse