OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# NPPC v. Ross/Opinion of Justice Barrett

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 21–468
NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCIL, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. KAREN ROSS, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD & AGRICULTURE, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT [May 11, 2023]
Justice Barrett, concurring in part.
A state law that burdens interstate commerce in clear excess of its putative local benefits flunks Pike balancing. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc., 397 U. S. 137, 142 (1970). In most cases, Pike’s “general rule” reflects a commonsense principle: Where there’s smoke, there’s fire. Ibid. Under our dormant Commerce Clause jurisprudence, one State may not discriminate against another’s producers or consumers. A law whose burdens fall incommensurately and inexplicably on out-of-state interests may be doing just that.
But to weigh benefits and burdens, it is axiomatic that both must be judicially cognizable and comparable. See Department of Revenue of Ky. v. Davis, 553 U. S. 328, 354–355 (2008). I agree with Justice Gorsuch that the benefits and burdens of Proposition 12 are incommensurable. California’s interest in eliminating allegedly inhumane products from its markets cannot be weighed on a scale opposite dollars and cents—at least not without second-guessing the moral judgments of California voters or making the kind of policy decisions reserved for politicians. Ante, at 18–21; Davis, 553 U. S., at 360 (Scalia, J., concurring in part). None ​of our Pike precedents requires us to attempt such a feat.
That said, I disagree with my colleagues who would hold that petitioners have failed to allege a substantial burden on interstate commerce. Ante, at 21–25; ante, at 3 (Sotomayor, J., concurring in part). The complaint plausibly alleges that Proposition 12’s costs are pervasive, burdensome, and will be felt primarily (but not exclusively) outside California. See post, at 6–7 (Roberts, C. J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). For this reason, I do not join Part IV–C of Justice Gorsuch’s opinion. If the burdens and benefits were capable of judicial balancing, I would permit petitioners to proceed with their Pike claim.
# Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible/Volume 6/First Corinthians
## Table of contents

* Preface
* Chapter 1
* Chapter 2
* Chapter 3
* Chapter 4
* Chapter 5
* Chapter 6
* Chapter 7
* Chapter 8
* Chapter 9
* Chapter 10
* Chapter 11
* Chapter 12
* Chapter 13
* Chapter 14
* Chapter 15
* Chapter 16
# Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible/Volume 6

* Preface to Volume 6
* Acts Chap. 1-15
* Acts Chap. 15-27
* Romans
* First Corinthians
* Second Corinthians
* Galatians
* Ephesians
* Philippians
* Colossians
* First Thessalonians
* Second Thessalonians
* First Timothy
* Second Timothy
* Titus
* Philemon
* Hebrews
* James
* First Peter
* Second Peter
* First John
* Second John
* Third John
* Jude
* Revelation
# Native Flowers of New Zealand/Plate 36

FREYCINETIA BANKSII.
Native Name:—Tawhara.
A very remarkable genus of chiefly Tropical Asiatic, Malayan, and Polynesian climbing plants, with long, rather grassy leaves. F. Banksii climbs the loftiest trees, rooting as it ascends, and branching copiously. Hook. fil. The inner leaves and spike are of a thick, white, juicy substance, which is said to make a good preserve; the young Colonists are fond of eating it, a taste shared by the rats, so much so, that it is difficult to obtain a perfect specimen. The leaves are used for basket making. Hab. Northern and Middle Islands. It flowers in November.
| Freycinetia Banksii | Leighton Brothers Lith |
| PLATE 36 ||
# Native Flowers of New Zealand/Plate 4

Senecio perdicioides, Hook, fil.
A compact close-growing little shrub, 6–12 ft. in height, apparently confined to a very limited district near the East Cape (North Island) where it was first collected, over a hundred years ago, by Banks and Solander, the distinguished naturalists who accompanied Cook in his first voyage to New Zealand. It is not closely allied to any of the other species native to the country, and can be easily recognized by its small oblong waved and crenate leaves, nearly smooth habit, and rather small flower heads. It flowers in December.
| Senecio perdiciodes | Leighton Brothers Lith |
| PLATE 4 ||
# Native Flowers of New Zealand/Plate 7

Pimelea longifolia, Banks and Sol.
A most charmingly handsome little shrub, seldom more than 6 ft. high. In mode of growth, foliage, and inflorescence, it closely resembles some of the Daphnes now so frequently cultivated in gardens. It is found throughout the North Island, and in the northern parts of the South Island. It flowers in March.
| Pimelea longifolia | Leighton Brothers Lith |
| PLATE 7 ||
# Native Flowers of New Zealand/Plate 8

Native Name:—NIKAU.
Areca Sapida,
Nikau Palm.
This is a very beautiful Palm, growing sometimes to a great height. The lovely lilac flower in its different stages from when it is packed into its sheath until the stage in which it is represented in plate 8, when it is commonly called a "hand," and afterwards when the same "hand" is covered with bright scarlet berries makes it a very beautiful object in the forest. The young infloresence is eaten and has an agreeable nut like flavour. It has simple ringed trunks, flowers very numerous and crowded, males and females mixed. It grows abundantly in the North Island and part of the Middle Island. It flowers in March.
| Areca sapida | Leighton Brothers Lith |
| PLATE 8 ||
# Native Flowers of New Zealand/Plate 35

OLEARIA INSIGNIS.
Mountain Daisy.
A very robust and remarkable species, the stems and leaves are densely covered with thick tomentum or hairs. This plate was drawn from a specimen sent by post; the leaves are therefore too close together and the flowers not sufficiently upright, but I was not able to obtain another specimen. It grows very large in the Awatere Valley and banks of the Waihopai. It approaches some Australian species in habit, size, and other respects. It flowers in November. Awatere.
| Olearia insignis | Leighton Brothers Lith |
| PLATE 35 ||
# Native Flowers of New Zealand/Plate 5

Celmisia Monroi, Hook, fil.
One of the most beautiful species of a very beautiful genus. The numerous stiff, pointed, furrowed and wrinkled leaves, and the large Aster-like flowers, which are placed on stalks covered with shaggy white wool, give the plant a very singular and remarkable appearance. It is a native of the mountains of Canterbury and Marlborough, usually growing at altitudes of from 2500 to 4000 ft. It is particularly abundant on Arthur's Pass, on the coach road from Christchurch to Hokitika, and is there one of the chief ornaments of a varied and handsome sub-alpine vegetation. It flowers in January and February.
Professor Oliver says:—
"The plant figured differs from the typical Celmisia Monroi in its much larger leaves, and heads nearly or quite destitute of cotton."
| Celemisia Monroi | Leighton Brothers Lith |
| PLATE 5 ||
# Native Flowers of New Zealand/Plate 6

MOUNTAIN RATA or IRONBARK.
Metrosideros lucida, Menzies.
A handsome tree, 30 to 50 ft. in height, not uncommon in hilly situations from the Thames river southwards. It is particularly abundant in the sounds on the South West Coast of Otago, and presents a magnificent sight when covered with its bright scarlet blossoms, which are often so abundantly produced as to clothe the whole forest with colour for miles together. The flowers are smaller than those of the true Rata (M. robusta) or Pohutukawa (M. tomentosa) but are very similar in structure. It flowers in January and February.
| Metrosideros lucida | Leighton Brothers Lith |
| PLATE 6 ||
# Native Flowers of New Zealand/Plate 9

Native Name:—KOHE-KOHE.
Dysoxylum spectabile, Hook, fil.
A large tree, forty to fifty feet high or more, with spreading branches and large dark green and glossy pinnate leaves. The flowers are waxy white, and are remarkable for being placed in long pendulous panicles springing from the branches considerably below the leaves. The leaves are very bitter; and an infusion of them is said to possess valuable tonic properties. It is confined to the North Island. It flowers in July and August.
| Kohe-Kohe Dysoxylum Spectabile | Leighton Brothers Lith |
| PLATE 9 ||
# National Labor Relations Board v. P. Lorillard Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
314 U.S. 512
National Labor Relations Board v. P. Lorillard Company
Argued: Dec. 18-19, 1941. --- Decided: Jan 5, 1942
Messrs. Francis Biddle, Atty. Gen., and Richard H. Demuth, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Homer Cummings, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Labor Relations Board v. Pacific Greyhound Lines

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
303 U.S. 272
National Labor Relations Board v. Pacific Greyhound Lines
Argued: Feb. 4, 1938. --- Decided: Feb 28, 1938
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Charles Fahy, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Ivan Bowen, of Minneapolis, Minn., for respondents.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Labor Relations Board v. News Syndicate Company/Dissent Clark

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Clark
United States Supreme Court
365 U.S. 695
National Labor Relations Board v. News Syndicate Company
Argued: March 1, 1961. --- Decided: April 17, 1961
Mr. Justice CLARK, dissenting.
I agree with the Court's disposition of that part of the Board's order requiring respondents to reimburse union members for dues and assessments. However, for the reasons stated in my dissent in Nos. 64 and 85, Local 357, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 365 U.S. 685, 81 S.Ct. 845, I believe that the inclusion in the agreement of the 'General Laws' and 'Foreman' clauses violated § 8(b)(1)(A) and (2) and § 8(a)(1) and (3). I, therefore, dissent from those portions of the Court's opinion.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Labor Relations Board v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corporation

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
368 U.S. 318
National Labor Relations Board v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corporation
Argued: Nov. 16, 1961. --- Decided: Dec 18, 1961
Archibald Cox, Sol. Gen., Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B.
No appearance for the respondents.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
303 U.S. 261
National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines
Argued: Feb. 4, 1938. --- Decided: Feb 28, 1938
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Charles Fahy, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Ivan Bowen, of Minneapolis, Minn., for respondents.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Labor Relations Board v. P. Lorillard Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
314 U.S. 512
National Labor Relations Board v. P. Lorillard Company
Argued: Dec. 18-19, 1941. --- Decided: Jan 5, 1942
The Board found that the respondent, P. Lorillard Company, had committed an unfair labor practice within the meaning of Section 8(5) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, 453, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(5), by refusing to bargain collectively with Pioneer Tobacco Workers' Local Industrial Union No. 55, which was at the time the duly selected bargaining representative of a majority of Lorillard's employees. The Board affirmatively ordered Lorillard to bargain collectively with Local No. 55. On the Board's petition for enforcement the court below sustained the Board's finding, but expressing the belief that because of lapse of time and changed conditions the Local might no longer represent the majority of employees, modified the Board's order so as to require it to conduct an election to determine whether the Local had lost its majority due to a shift of employees to a rival independent association. The Board had considered the effect of a possible shift in membership, alleged to have occurred subsequent to Lorillard's unfair labor practice. But it had reached the conclusion that in order to effectuate the policies of the Act, Lorillard must remedy the effect of its prior unlawful refusal to bargain by bargaining with the union shown to have had a majority on the date of Lorillard's refusal to bargain. This was for the Board to determine, and the court below was in error in modifying the Board's order in this respect. National Labor Relations Board v. Bradford Dyeing Ass'n, 310 U.S. 318, 339, 340, 60 S.Ct. 918, 929, 84 L.Ed. 1226; International Association of M., T. and D.M.L. v. Labor Board, 311 U.S. 72, 82, 61 S.Ct. 82, 89, 85 L.Ed. 50. See also National Labor Relations Board v. Falk Corp., 308 U.S. 453, 458, 459, 60 S.Ct. 307, 310, 84 L.Ed. 396. The judgment of the court below is reversed with directions to enforce the order of the Board.
Reversed.
The CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice ROBERTS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Union of Marine Cooks and Stewards v. Arnold

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
348 U.S. 37
National Union of Marine Cooks and Stewards v. Arnold
Argued: Oct. 15, 1954. --- Decided: Nov 22, 1954
It took the following course:
1949-In the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County, Amend. 14.
Mr.Norman Leonard, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
Mr. John Geisness, Seattle, Wash., for respondents.
Mr. Justice BURTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Trailer Convoy v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
394 U.S. 849
National Trailer Convoy v. United States
The motions to affirm and granted and the judgment is affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Union Fire Insurance Company v. Wanberg

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
260 U.S. 71
National Union Fire Insurance Company v. Wanberg
Argued: Oct. 6, 1922. --- Decided: Nov 13, 1922
Messrs. Nathan H. Chase, of Minneapolis, Minn., and Wm. H. Barnett, of Fargo, N. D., for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. W. B. Overson and Wm. G. Owens, both of Williston, N. D., for defendant in error.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# National Health Expenditures 2017 Highlights

National Health Expenditures 2017 Highlights
U.S. health care spending increased 3.9 percent to reach $3.5 trillion, or $10,739 per person in 2017. Health care spending growth in 2017 was similar to average growth from 2008 to 2013, which preceded the faster growth experienced during the 2014-15 period that was marked by insurance coverage expansion and high rates of growth in retail prescription drug spending. The overall share of gross domestic product (GDP) related to health care spending was 17.9 percent in 2017, similar to that in 2016 (18.0 percent).
Health Spending by Type of Service or Product:
Health Spending by Major Sources of Funds:
Health Spending by Type of Sponsor1:
1Type of sponsor is defined as the entity that is ultimately responsible for financing the health care bill, such as private businesses, households, and governments. These sponsors pay health insurance premiums and out-of-pocket costs, or finance health care through dedicated taxes and/or general revenues.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McClure's Magazine/Volume 29/Number 4/Evening Song

from August 1907, p. 365; it has not been compared with the original version from the collection April Twilights
    Dear love, what thing of all things that be
    Is ever worth one thought from you or me,
       Save only Love,
       Save only Love?
    The days so short, the nights so quick to flee,
    The world so wide, so deep and dark the sea,
       So dark the sea;
    So far the sun and every listless star,
    Beyond their light — Ah! dear, who knows how far,
       Who knows how far?
    One thing of all dim things I know is true,
    The heart within me knows, and tells it you,
       And tells it you.
    So blind is life, so lond at last is sleep,
    And none but Love to bid us laugh or weep,
       And none but Love,
       And none but Love.
# New Jersey P.L.1988, c.57

* information about this edition.
* related portals: New Jersey Legislature.
CHAPTER 57, LAWS OF 1988
AN ACT prohibiting the ocean disposal of sewage sludge, and supplementing P.L.1977, c.74.
BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:
C.58:10A-44 Short title.
    1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Ocean Sludge Dumping Elimination Act."
C.58:10A-45 Findings.
    2. The Legislature finds that 2.8 million wet tons (1 million dry pounds) of sewage sludge generated by six New Jersey municipal treatment works each day are ocean disposed at the federally designated 106-mile dump site; that these sludges are ocean rather than land disposed in recognition of the threat posed by the presence of contaminants; that the United States Environmental Protection Agency has officially affirmed a termination of ocean dumping as its adopted policy, a goal undermined by continuing at-sea disposal of sewage sludge; and that experts in deepwater ocean ecosystems have attested to the deleterious effects of waste disposal on the ocean environment.
C.58:10A-46 Ocean disposal prohibited.
    3. The provisions of any other law, rule or regulation to the contrary notwithstanding, municipal treatment works are prohibited from disposing of sludge in ocean waters by March 17, 1991.
    4. This act shall take effect immediately. Approved July 11, 1988.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Coventry, Millis

​Coventry, Millis, B.A., Trin. Hall, Camb., 1862, a member of the Northern circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 18 Jan., 1861 (then aged 23), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1864 (4th son of Millis Coventry, sen., Esq., of Wandsworth Common, Surrey); born 1838.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Coward, John Charles Lewis

​Coward, John Charles Lewis, B.A., Corpus Christi Coll., Camb., 1874, exhibitioner 1870, Manson scholar 1871, prizeman 1872, junior counsel for the defendant in Belt v. Lawes, registrar of court for trial of parliamentary election petitions 1880 and of court for trial of municipal election petitions 1879, ensign and lieut. Camb. Univ. volunteer corps 1872-3, a member of the South-eastern circuit, a student of Gray's Inn 9 Nov., 1874, called to the bar 13 June, 1877 (eldest son of Rev. John Henry Coward, rector of St. Peter le Poer, London); born 19 April, 1852; married 15 April, 1879, Millicent Horatia, 2nd dau. of Sir Clinton Murdoch, K.C.M.G.
    72, Claverton Street, Pimlico, S.W.; 3, Pump Court, Temple, E.C.; United University and Whitehall Clubs.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Courtney, Leonard Henry

​Courtney, Leonard Henry, M.A., M.P. Liskeard since 1876, financial secretary to the Treasury 1882-4, professor of political economy at Univ. Coll. 1872-5, under-secretary of state for home department 1880-1 and for colonial affairs 1881-2, B.A. (second wrangler and fellow), St. John's Coll., Camb., 1855, M.A. 1858, examiner to Inns of Court 186–, a student of Lincoln's Inn 23 Nov., 1855 (then aged 23), called to the bar 7 June, 1858 (eldest son of John Sampson Courtney, of Penzance); born 1832; married 1883 Catherine, dau. of Richard Potter, Esq., of Standish House, Stonehouse, co. Glouc.
    15, Cheyne Walk, Chelsea, S.W.; Treasury, Whitehall, S.W.; Chapel Stairs, Lincoln's Inn, W.C.; Reform Club.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Coward, Thomas Holford

​Coward, Thomas Holford, LL.M., Queen's Coll., Camb., 1877, B.A. 1873, a student of the Inner Temple 18 Nov., 1872 (then aged 18), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1876 (eldest son of Thomas Coward, Esq., M.A, Queen's Coll., Camb.); born , 1854.
    Cambridge; 7, New Square, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Coveny, Christopher John

​Coveny, Christopher John, matric. London Univ. 1865, a student of the Middle Temple 9 Nov., 1865, called to the bar 7 June, 1869 (2nd son of Robert Coveny, sometime of Kinsale, co. Cork, and then of Australia); born , .
# Men-at-the-Bar/Courthope, William John

​Courthope, William John, B.A. New Coll., Oxon, examiner in education department since 1871, a student of Lincoln's Inn 3 Nov., 1866 (then aged 25), called to the bar 30 April, 1870 (eldest son of Rev. William Courthope, late of Mailing, Sussex, clerk, dec.); born 1841; married 2 Nov., 1870, Mary, dau. of John Scott, Esq., inspr.-genl. hospitals Bombay.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Coutts, James

​Coutts, James, practises before the supreme court at Sydney, a student of the Middle Temple 3 Nov., 1870, called to the bar 7 June, 1873 (2nd son of John Coutts, of Rosewood Queensland, gent.); born , .
    Sydney, New South Wales.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Cove-Jones, James

​Cove-Jones, James, J.P., D.L. co. Warwick, high sheriff 1878, educated at Eton, a student of the Middle Temple 9 Nov., 1841, called to the bar 8 May, 1846 (only son of James Cove-Jones, of Leamington, co. Warwick, M.D.); born , 1823; married , 1852, Charlotte Emma, dau. of John Bulkeley, Esq., and has issue.
    Loxley Hall, near Uttoxeter.