OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Message to the Senate of January 11, 1790

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
UNITED STATES, January 11, 1790.
Gentlemen of the Senate.
Having advised with you upon the terms of a treaty to be offered to the Creek Nation of Indians, I think it proper you should be informed of the result of that business previous to its coming before you in your legislative capacity. I have therefore directed the Secretary for the Department of War to lay before you my instructions to the commissioners and their report in consequence thereof.
The apparently critical state of the Southern frontier will render it expedient for me to communicate to both Houses of Congress, with other papers, the whole of the transactions relative to the Creeks, in order that they may be enabled to form a judgment of the measures which the case may require.
G$^o$ WASHINGTON.
# Morning—is the place for Dew—

Morning — is the place for Dew — Corn — is made at Noon — After dinner light — for flowers — Dukes — for Setting Sun!
# Morns like these—we parted—

* "Morns like these we parted" in Poems: Second Series (1891)
* "Morns like these we parted" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# Morphy's Games/Anderssen

MATCH BETWEEN MR. MORPHY AND HERR
ANDERSSEN.
THIS match, like that with Herr Harrwitz, was played at the Cafe de la Regence, in Paris. It was commenced on the 20th December, 1858, and brought to a conclusion in the short space of eight days. The winner of the first seven games was to be the victor. At the termination of the match Mr, Morphy has scored sever, Anderssen two — two had been drawn. This contest excited intense interest throughout the continent of Europe. Herr Anderssen exjoyed the reputation in France, German and elsewhere of being the first player in Europe. It will be remembered that he successfully competed for the highest honors and defeated Mr. Staunton at the Internation Tournament, held in the British Metropolis, during the Great Exhibition of 1851.
    Game I—Evan's Gambit
    Game II—Ruy Lopez Knight's Game
    Game III—Ruy Lopez Knight's Game
    Game IV—Ruy Lopez Knight's Game
    Game V—Irregular Opening
    Game VI—Irregular Opening
    Game VII—Irregular Opening
    Game VIII—Sicilian Opening
    Game IX—Sicilian Opening
    Game X—French Opening
# Morphy's Games/Anderssen/Game I

(GAME I.—EVANS' GAMBIT.)
| White. | —MR MORPHY. | Black. | —MR ANDERSSEN. |
| | P K 4 Kt K B 3 B B 4 P Q Kt 4 P Q B 3 P Q 4 Castles P K 5 (c) B Q Kt 5 PxP BXKt Q Q R 4 QxB P B Kt 2 PxB Kt Q 2 (d) K R (f) P K B 4 QxQ P K Kt (g) B Q B 3 Q K B 3 K R Q Kt 2 R K Kt Q R K B (h) Q Q B 6 (k) Q K Kt 2 BxB Kt K B 3 P K R 4 Q Kt 4 R Kt 2 Q B 5 Q B 6 (l) Q B 5 RxR K R 2 R K B 2 Kt Q 2 QxB P ch Kt K 4 KtxR Kt Kt 4 K Kt 3 K R 2 K Kt 3 K R 2 P R 5 Kt B 6 (n) QxP ch Q Kt 6 ch QxP ch Q Kt 6 ch P R 6 P R 7 K Kt P R 8 (becoming a Q.) QxKt | | P K 4 Kt Q B 3 B B 4 BxP B R 4 (a) PxP Kt B 3 (b) P Q 4 Kt K 5 Castles PxB B Kt 3 B Kt 5 BxKt Kt Kt 4 R K (e) Kt R 6 Q K R 5 KtxP ch Kt Q 6 KtxB P Kt R 6 ch Kt Kt 4 Q R Q P K R 3 Q R 6 (i) Q Q 2 BxP QxB Q Q 4 Kt K 3 Q Q B 3 R Q 6 K R Q Q Q 4 R Q 8 QxR ch R Q 6 R K 6 R K 7 K R RxR ch Q Q 4 QxR P ch Q Kt 6 ch Q B 7 ch Q B 6 ch Q Q B 3 (m) P R 4 PxKt K Kt K B K K K Q 2 Q Q 4 (o) QxP 2 ch Kt Kt 4 QxQ Q Q 5 ch, and the |
| game after being prolonged for upwards of seventy moves, was eventually won by Black. ||||

## Notes

(a) Since Mr. Waller's analysis of this opening, (C.P.C. vol 9, page 280,) an opinion has gained ground, that of the two defences B R 4 and B B 4 the latter at this point is the better, and the following moves are given in proof of the weakness of the former, namely:
| Castles P Q 4 Q Q Kt 8 P X Q P P K 5 P + P Kt Kt 5 | B R 4 P Q 8 P X P Q K B 3 B Q Kt 3 P X P Q K Kt 3 Kt K R 3 |
Mr W. continues his analysis to the 17th move, and quits it, expressing his belief that White has the better game. The author of "Popular Introduction of Chess," coincides with this opinion, but it appears to us that an important defence has remained unnoticed by both, namely, Q Kt Q, which seems not only to ward of the attack, but actually to give Black a strong defensive position, thus:
| | P K 6 R K R K 2 | Q Kt Q B x K P Q K B 4 K Kt K 2 and white's attack |
| seems parried ||||
       * This appears to be White's best move; if R K, Black would reply B K 8, speedily developing his forces and remaining with a Pawn ahead.
       †This move was suggested to us by Herr Harrwitz, who concurs with us in our opinion of the goodness of Black;s 12th move, Kt Q.
(b) Mr. Morphy considers this the best move here, and Mr. Anderssen seems to agree with him; though some time ago, in an elaborate analysis, the latter went far to prove that it was a weak defence. The other lines of play available are P x P and P Q 6, and as no analysis of these has ever appeared in any English work on Chess, we refer out readers for it to the Berlin Schachzeitung of 1951, page 54.
(c) B R 3 is the more preferable move; its efficacy was but lately discovered by Mr. Morphy, who thinks the game should be continued by
| | P K 5 etc, | P Q 3 |
| with a strong attack ||||
In the table above, the last line should flow on from "etc," (Wikisource contributor note)
(d) We here give the position of the forces on a diagram, as it is very instructive:
BLACK.
WHITE.
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(l)
(m)
(n)
(o)
# Morrill Act

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Morrill Act."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Morrill Act (1862)
* Morrill Act (1890)
# Nation of Islam: Cult of the Black Muslims/Chapter 1

CONFIDENTIAL
I. ROLE OF FBI
One of the FBI's many responsibilities is that of investigating members of "basic revolutionary organizations or groups" who are dangerous or potentially dangerous to the internal security of the United States.
Persons included under this responsibility are leading functionaries and active, militant members of the Nation of Islam (NOI), who because of their fanatical antiwhite and anti-United States Government teachings and beliefs would be potentially dangerous and likely to seize upon the opportunity presented by a national emergency to endanger the public safety and welfare.
Therefore, the FBI must determine the identities, whereabouts, and activities of these individuals constituting a threat to the internal security, and must develop sufficient information and evidence to sustain appropriate action against such individuals or to control their movements and activities in the event of a national emergency.
# Nation of Islam: Cult of the Black Muslims

THIS DOCUMENT IS LOANED TO YOU BY THE FBI AND NEITHER IT NOR ITS CONTENTS ARE TO BE DISTRIBUTED OUTSIDE THE AGENCY TO WHICH LOANED
* FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
* UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
* JOHN EDGAR HOOVER, DIRECTOR
MONOGRAPH DATA
| 1. | Title of monograph and date: | "Nation of Islam," May, 1965 |
| 2. | Monograph recommended by: | R. W. Smith (25-330971-6686) |
| 3. | Monograph approved by: | Mr. Tolson (25-330971-7333) |
| 4. | Purpose of monograph: | To clarify the distorted image of this organization and to reveal its true consequence. |
| 5. | Monograph is part of a series. | Monograph is part of a series. |
| 6. | Monograph will have current value as a reference work after a lapse of six months or a year. | Monograph will have current value as a reference work after a lapse of six months or a year. |
NATION OF ISLAM
Cult of the Black Muslims
May, 1965
Federal Bureau of Investigation
United States Department of Justice
John Edgar Hoover, Director
65 D
TABLE OF CONTENTS
# Nathanson v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
290 U.S. 41
Nathanson v. United States
Argued: Oct. 9, 1933. --- Decided: Nov 6, 1933
Mr. Frederic M. P. Pearse, of Newark, N.J. (Mr. Max Mehler, of Newark, N.J., on the brief), for petitioner.
The Attorney General and Mr. Angus D. MacLean, Asst. Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 42-44 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Nation of Islam: Cult of the Black Muslims/Chapter 2

II. BACKGROUND OF NOI
A previous monograph explained how the Nation of Islam originated as one of many militant and cultist groups which had arisen in the northern industrial cities of the United States following World War I.
Briefly, the NOI, known at various times as Allah's Temple of Islam and the Muslim Cult of Islam, developed in Detroit, Michigan, out of the teachings of one W. D. Fard. Fard was a door-to-door peddler in the Negro neighborhoods of that city. To stimulate his sales, he told his customers that his products came from their home country from which he also had come. His rather mystic personality apparently entranced his customers, and before long he was instructing small gatherings with tales of their "true origin." In this way, the tenets of the cult were developed. Little factual data was ever learned concerning Fard; and after May, 1933, when ordered by local authorities to leave Detroit, he dropped out of sight and no trace of him has ever been found.
Following Fard's disappearance, one of his followers, a Georgia-born Negro named Elijah Poole, assumed leadership of the cult. Poole explained that Fard had been Allah himself, had renamed him "Elijah Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah," and had ordered him to continue teaching "the lost-found black people in the wilderness of North America."
Elijah was active in Detroit until late in 1934, when, because of trouble with local authorities over the operation of the cult school, he moved to Chicago. There, he established Temple No. 2, which became and remains the national headquarters of the NOI.
During the succeeding 30 years, Elijah Muhammad's teachings aroused the interest of many persons who joined the NOI. But Elijah's unorthodox approach and his demands for absolute control over the cult and its members disenchanted many after only short periods of membership. Still, the cult has a certain influence and a considerable following. There are now 38 numbered temples or mosques, one of which is inactive, and 31 unnumbered groups in the United States. Most are centered in the Midwest and the East, with a few groups in the South and a few in the Far West.
# Memoir and Poems of Phillis Wheatley/On Death

ON DEATH.
Deceitful worm, that undermines the clay,
Which slyly steals the thoughtless soul away,
Pervading neighborhoods with sad surprise,
Like sudden storms of wind and thunder rise.
The sounding death-watch lurks within the wall,
Away some unsuspecting soul to call;
The pendant willow droops her waving head.
And sighing zephyrs whisper of the dead.
Methinks I hear the doleful midnight knell—
Some parting spirit bids the world farewell;
The taper burns as conscious of distress,
And seems to show the living number less.
Must a lov'd daughter from her father part,
And grieve for one who lies so near her heart? ​And must she for the fatal loss bemoan,
Or faint to hear his last departing groan.
Methinks I see him speechless gaze awhile,
And on her drop his last paternal smile;
With gushing tears closing his humid eyes,
The last pulse beats, and in her arms he dies.
With pallid cheeks she lingers round his bier,
And heaves a farewell sigh with every tear;
With sorrow she consigns him to the dust,
And silent owns the fatal sentence just.
Still her sequestered mother seems to weep,
And spurns the balm which constitutes her sleep;
Her plaintive murmurs float upon the gale,
And almost make the stubborn rocks bewail.
O what is like the awful breach of death,
Whose fatal stroke invades the creature's breath!
It bids the voice of desolation roll,
And strikes the deepest awe within the bravest soul.
# Memoir and Poems of Phillis Wheatley/Hymn to the Morning

HYMN TO THE MORNING
Attend my lays, ye ever honored Nine,
Assist my labors, and my strains refine;
In smoothest numbers pour the notes along.
For bright Aurora now demands my song.
Aurora hail! and all the thousand dies
Which deck thy progress through the vaulted skies ​ The morn awakes, and wide extends her rays,
On ev'ry leaf the gentle zephyr plays;
Harmonious lays the feathered race resume,
Dart the bright eye, and shake the painted plume.
Ye shady groves, your verdant bloom display,
To shield your poet from the burning day:
Calliope, awake the sacred lyre,
While thy fair sisters fan the pleasing fire.
The bowers, the gales, the variegated skies,
In all their pleasures in my bosom rise.
See in the east, the illustrious king of day!
His rising radiance drives the shades away—
But oh! I feel his fervid beams too strong,
And scarce begun, concludes the abortive song.
# Memoir and Poems of Phillis Wheatley/Lines

LINES,
On hearing of the intention of a gentleman to purchase the Poet's freedom.
When on life's ocean first I spread my sail,
I then implored a mild auspicious gale;
And from the slippery strand I took my flight,
And sought the peaceful haven of delight.
Tyrranic storms arose upon my soul,
And dreadful did their mad'ning thunders roll;
The pensive muse was shaken from her sphere,
And hope, it vanished in the clouds of fear.
At length a golden sun broke through the gloom,
And from his smiles arose a sweet perfume—
A calm ensued, and birds began to sing,
And lo! the sacred muse resumed her wing.
With frantic joy she chaunted as she flew,
And kiss'd the clement hand that bore her through;
Her envious foes did from her sight retreat,
Or prostrate fall beneath her burning feet.
'T was like a proselyte, allied to Heaven—
Or rising spirits' boast of sins forgiven,
Whose shout dissolves the adamant away,
Whose melting voice the stubborn rocks obey. ​ 'Twas like the salutation of the dove,
Borne on the zephyr through some lonesome grove,
When Spring returns, and Winter's chill is past,
And vegetation smiles above the blast.
'T was like the evening of a nuptial pair,
When love pervades the hour of sad despair—
'Twas like fair Helen's sweet return to Troy,
When every Grecian bosom swell'd with joy.
The silent harp which on the osiers hung,
Was then attuned, and manumission sung;
Away by hope the clouds of fear were driven,
And music breathed my gratitude to Heaven.
Hard was the race to reach the distant goal,
The needle oft was shaken from the pole;
In such distress who could forbear to weep?
Toss'd by the headlong billows of the deep!
The tantalizing beams which shone so plain,
Which turned my former pleasures into pain—
Which falsely promised all the joys of fame,
Gave way, and to a more substantial flame.
Some philanthropic souls as from afar,
With pity strove to break the slavish bar;
To whom my floods of gratitude shall roll,
And yield with pleasure to their soft control.
And sure of Providence this work begun—
He shod my feet this rugged race to run; ​And in despite or all the swelling tide,
Along the dismal path will prove my guide.
Thus on the dusky verge of deep despair,
Eternal Providence was with me there;
When pleasure seemed to fade on life's gay dawn,
And the last beam of hope was almost gone.
# Memoir and Poems of Phillis Wheatley/Isaiah

ISAIAH, 63d Chap. 1st and 8th verses.
Say, heavenly Muse, what king, or mighty God,
That moves sublime from Idumea's road?
In Bozrah's dyes, with martial glories joined,
His purple vesture waves upon the wind.
Why thus enrobed delights he to appear
In the dread image of the Power of war?
Compressed in wrath, the swelling wine-press groaned;
It bled, and poured the gushing purple round.
"Mine was the art," the Almighty Saviour said,
And shook the dazzling glories of his head;
"When all forsook, I trod the press alone,
"And conquered by omnipotence my own; ​ "For man's release sustained the ponderous load,
"For man the wrath of an immortal God; "To execute the Eternal's dread command,
"My soul I sacrificed with willing hand;
"Sinless I stood before the avenging frown,
"Atoning thus, for vices not my own."
His eye the ample field of battle round
Surveyed, but no created succors found;
His own omnipotence sustained the fight,
His vengeance sunk the haughty foes in night,
Beneath his feet the prostrate troops were spread,
And round him lay the dying and the dead.
Great God, what lightning flashes from thine eyes!
What power withstands if thou indignant rise?
Against thy Zion though her foes may rage,
And all their cunning, all their strength engage,
Yet she serenely on thy bosom lies,
Smiles at their arts, and all their force defies.
# Memoir and Poems of Phillis Wheatley/Ode to Neptune

ODE TO NEPTUNE,
On Mrs. W———'s Voyage to England.
While raging tempests shake the shore,
While Æolas' thunders round us roar,
And sweep impetuous o'er the plain,
Be still, O tyrant of the main;
Nor let thy brow contracted frowns betray,
While my Susannah skims the watery way.
The Power propitious hears the lay,
The blue-eyed daughters of the sea
With sweeter cadence glide along,
And Thames responsive joins the song.
Pleased with their note, Sol sheds benign his ray,
And double radiance decks the face of day.
To court thee to Britannia's arms,
Serene the clime and mild the sky,
Her region boasts unnumbered charms;
Thy welcome smiles in ev'ry eye.
Thy promise, Neptune, keep; record my prayer,
Nor give my wishes to the empty air.
Boston, October 10, 1772.
# Memoir and Poems of Phillis Wheatley/On Imagination

ON IMAGINATION.
Thy various works, imperial queen, we see
How bright their forms! how decked with pomp by thee!
Thy wond'rous acts in beauteous order stand,
And all attest how potent is thine hand. ​ From Helicon's refulgent heights attend,
Ye sacred choir, and my attempts befriend:
To tell her glories with a faithful tongue,
Ye blooming graces, triumph in my song.
Now here, now there, the roving Fancy flies,
Till some loved object strikes her wand'ring eyes,
Whose silken fetters all the senses bind,
And soft captivity involves the mind.
Imagination! who can sing thy force?
Or who describe the swiftness of thy course?
Soaring through air to find the bright abode,
The empyreal palace of the thundering God,
We on thy pinions can surpass the wind,
And leave the rolling universe behind:
From star to star the mental optics rove,
Measure the skies, and range the realms above.
There in one view we grasp the mighty whole,
Or with new worlds amaze the unbounded soul.
Though Winter frowns, to Fancy's raptured eyes
The fields may flourish, and gay scenes arise;
The frozen deeps may burst their iron bands,
And bid their waters murmur o'er the sands.
Fair Flora may resume her fragrant reign,
And with her flowery riches deck the plain;
Sylvanus may diffuse his honors round,
And all the forests may with leaves be crowned;
Showers may descend, and dews their gems disclose,
And nectar sparkle on the blooming rose.
Such is thy power, nor are thine orders vain.
O thou, the leader of the mental train: ​In full perfection all thy works are wrought,
And thine the sceptre o'er the realms of thought;
Before thy throne the subject passions bow,
Of subject-passions sov'reign ruler Thou;
At thy command joy rushes on the heart,
And through the glowing veins the spirits dart.
Fancy might now her silken pinions try
To rise from earth, and sweep the expanse on high;
From Tithon's bed now might Aurora rise,
Her cheeks all glowing with celestial dyes,
While a pure stream of light o'erflows the skies.
The monarch of the day I might behold,
And all the mountains tipt with radiant gold,
But I reluctant leave the pleasing views,
Which Fancy dresses to delight the Muse;
Winter austere forbids me to aspire,
And northern tempests damp the rising fire;
They chill the tides of Fancy's flowing sea,—
Cease then my song, cease then the unequal lay.
# Mitchell v. United States (368 U.S. 439)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Clark
United States Supreme Court
368 U.S. 439
Mitchell v. United States (368 U.S. 439)
Argued: Jan. 22, 1962. ---
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari, which presents the question whether materially false testimony was used against petitioner at the trial, are granted, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the District Court for a hearing upon petitioner's motion, treated as a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Cf. Mesarosh v. United States, 352 U.S. 1, 77 S.Ct. 1, 1 L.Ed.2d 1. We, of course, intimate no view upon the merits of the motion.
Motion granted.
Mr. Justice CLARK, with whom Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice STEWART join, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Mitchell v. United States (386 U.S. 972)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
386 U.S. 972
Mitchell v. United States (386 U.S. 972)
Denied.
Petitioner did not report for induction as ordered, was indicted, convicted, and sentenced to five years imprisonment and his conviction was affirmed. 369 F.2d 323. His defense was that the 'war' in Vietnam was being conducted in violation of various treaties to which we were a signatory especially the Treaty of London of August 8, 1945, 59 Stat. 1544, which in Article 6(a) declares that 'waging of a war of aggression' is a 'crime against peace' imposing 'individual responsibility.' Article 8 provides:
'The fact that the Defendant acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior shall not free him from responsibility, but may be considered in mitigation of punishment if the Tribunal determines that justice so requires.' Petitioner claimed that the 'war' in Vietnam was a 'war of aggression' within the meaning of the Treaty of London and that Article 8 makes him responsible for participating in it even though he is ordered to do so.
Mr. Justice Jackson, the United States prosecutor at Nuremberg, stated: 'If certain acts in violation of treaties are crimes, they are crimes whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them, and we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us.' (International Conference on Military Trials, Dept. State Pub. No. 3880, p. 330.)
Article VI, cl. 2 of the Constitution states that 'treaties' are a part of 'the supreme law of the land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby.'
There is a considerable body of opinion that our actions in Vietnam constitute the waging of an aggressive 'war.'
(1) whether the Treaty of London is a treaty within the meaning of Art. VI, cl. 2;
(2) whether the question as to the waging of an aggressive 'war' is in the context of this criminal prosecution a justiciable question;
(3) whether the Vietnam episode is a 'war' in the sense of the Treaty;
(4) whether petitioner has standing to raise the question;
(5) whether, if he has, it may be tendered as a defense in this criminal case or in amelioration of the punishment.
These are extremely sensitive and delicate questions. But they should, I think, be answered. Even those who think that the Nuremberg judgments were unconstitutional by our guarantee relating to ex post facto laws would have to take a different view of the Treaty of London that purports to lay down a standard of future conduct for all the signatories.
I intimate no opinion on the merits. But I think the petition for certiorari should be granted. We have here a recurring question in present-day Selective Service cases.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse