OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Man: King of Mind, Body, and Circumstance/Man's Spiritual Dominion

Man’s Spiritual Dominion
The kingdom over which man is destined to rule with undisputed sway is that of his own mind and life; but this kingdom, as already shown, is not separate from the universe, is not confined to itself alone; it is intimately related to entire humanity, to nature, to the current of events in which it is, for the time being, involved, and to the vast universe. Thus the mastery of this kingdom embraces the mastery of the knowledge of life; it lifts a man into the supremacy of wisdom, bestowing upon him the gift of insight into human hearts, giving him the power to distinguish between good and evil, also to comprehend that which is above both good and evil, and to know the nature and consequences of deeds.
At present men are more or less under the sway of rebellious thoughts, and the conquest of these is the supreme conquest of life. The unwise think that everything ​can be mastered but oneself, and they seek for happiness for themselves and others by modifying external things. The transposing of outward effects cannot bring permanent happiness, or bestow wisdom; the patching and coddling of a sin-laden body cannot produce health and well-being. The wise know that there is no real mastery until self is subdued, that when oneself is conquered, the subjugation of externals is finally assured, and they find happiness for ever springing up within them, in the calm strength of divine virtue. They put away sin, and purify and strengthen the body by rising superior to the sway of its passions.
Man can reign over his own mind; can be lord over himself. Until he does so reign, his life is unsatisfactory and imperfect. His spiritual dominion is the empire of the mental forces of which his nature is composed. The body has no causative power. The ruling of the body—that is, of appetite and passion—is the discipline of mental ​forces. The subduing, modifying, redirecting, and transmuting of the antagonizing spiritual elements within, is the wonderful and mighty work which all men must, sooner or later, undertake. For a long time man regards himself as the slave of external forces, but there comes a day when his spiritual eyes open, and he sees that he has been a slave this long time to none and nothing but his own ungoverned, unpurified self. In that day, he rises up, and, ascending his spiritual throne, he no longer obeys his desires, appetites, and passions as their slave, but henceforth rules them as his subjects. The mental kingdom through which he has been wont to wander as a puling beggar and a whipped serf, he now discovers is his by right of lordly self-control—his to set in order, to organize and harmonize, to abolish its dissensions and painful contradictions, and bring it to a state of peace.
Thus rising up and exercising his right​ful spiritual authority, he enters the company of those kingly ones who in all ages have conquered and attained, who have overcome ignorance, darkness, and mental suffering, and have ascended into Truth.
Layout 2
# McMillen v. Ferrum Mining Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
197 U.S. 343
McMillen v. Ferrum Mining Company
Argued: March 15, 16, 1905. --- Decided: April 3, 1905
By this writ of error it is sought to review a judgment of the supreme court of Colorado, affirming a judgment of the district court of Lake county in favor of the Ferrum Mining Company in a proceeding brought by the plaintiffs in error under Rev. Stat. § 2326 (U.S.C.omp. Stat. 1901, p. 1430), to determine the right of possession to certain mining grounds, plaintiffs claiming title as owners of the Eulalia Lode Mining claim, and the defendants claiming title to the same ground as the Golden Rod Lode Mining claim.
The case was tried before the court and a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendants, which was affirmed by the supreme court upon the ground that plaintiffs had not complied with either the Federal or the state statutes, in showing a valid discovery of mineral in their location.
Mr. George R. Elder for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Charles Cavender and John A. Ewing for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Brown delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McMonagle v. Northeast Women's Center Inc.

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    White
United States Supreme Court
493 U.S. 901
McMonagle v. Northeast Women's Center Inc.
No. 88-2137
Leave to File Petition for Rehearing Denied March 19, 1990.
See 494 U.S. 1050, 110 S.Ct. 1515.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McMonagle v. Northeast Women's Center Inc./Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion White
Denied.
Justice WHITE, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McMorran v. Tuscarora Nation of Indians

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
362 U.S. 608
McMorran v. Tuscarora Nation of Indians
Messrs. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Paxton Blair, Sol. Gen., and Julius L. Sackman, for appellant.
Messrs. Arthur Lazarus, Jr. and Eugene Gressman, for appellee.
Mr. Thomas F. Moore, Jr., for Power Authority of State of New York, as amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McMillan Contracting Company v. Abernathy

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
263 U.S. 438
McMillan Contracting Company v. Abernathy
Submitted on Motion to Remand Oct. 18, 1923.
Decided Jan. 7, 1924.
Messrs. Justin D. Bowersock and Arthur Miller, both of Kansas City, Mo., for appellants.
Messrs. O. H. Dean, H. M. Langworthy, Roy B. Thomson, M. W. Borders, and Albert S. Marley, all of Kansas City, Mo., for appellees.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McGrath v. Rhay/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
364 U.S. 279
McGrath v. Rhay
The respondent's motion to dismiss the writ of certiorari is denied. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington is vacated and the case is remanded for determination of the following questions of Washington law now involved in the case: (1) whether the case is moot as a habeas corpus proceeding; and (2) if it is, whether, to avoid mootness, it can properly be treated as an application for some other form of appropriate relief.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McGuffey's Eclectic Spelling Book

To the reader: This is an online version of a 19th century spelling textbook, and therefore any copyright reference is used to serve for historical purposes only.

## McGUFFEY'S ECLECTIC SPELLING-BOOK

Revised Edition
McGuffey Editions and Colophon are Trademarks of
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
NEW YORK-CHICHESTER-WEINHEIM-BRISBANE-SINGAPORE-TORONTO
Preface
# McGrath v. Rhay

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
364 U.S. 279
McGrath v. Rhay
Petitioners pro se.
Messrs. John J. O'Connell, Atty. Gen. of Washington, and Stephen C. Way, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McGuffey's Eclectic Spelling Book/The English Alphabet

THE ENGLISH ALPHABET.
The English Alphabet consists of twenty-six letters, viz.: a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m,n,o,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,x,y,z.
Letters are divided into VOWELS and CONSONANTS.
The Vowels are those letters which can be perfectly sounded without the aid of any other letter. The vowels are a, e, i, o, u, w, and y.
The vowel sounds of w and y are the same as those of u and i. A, e, and o are always vowels. I, u, w, and y are sometimes consonants.
A Diphthong is the union of two vowels in one sound. When both vowels are sounded, the diphthong is called PROPER, because then it is really a DIPHTHONG, or double sound; that is, the sounds of the vowels unite; as, oi in oil; ou in sound.
When only one of the vowels is sounded, the diphthong is called IMPROPER, because then, as one of the vowels is silent, it is not properly a DIPHTHONG, though it takes that name; as, oa in boat, ui in suit, where a and i are silent.
The following diphthongs are in common use, viz.: oi, oy, ou, ow, ae, ai, au, aw, ay, ea, ei, eo, eu, ew, ey, ia, ie, oa, oe, ua, ue, ui; as in toil, boy, round, plow, seal, coal, head, sail, say, aught, yeoman. Of these, oi, oy, ou, and ow are generally proper diphthongs; though sometimes ou and ow are improper, as in famous, where o is silent, and in slow, where w is silent.
A Triphthong is the union of three vowels in one syllable; as, eau in beau, iew in view. The triphthong is properly a union of letters, not sounds.
# McGuire v. Blount

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
199 U.S. 142
McGuire v. Blount
Argued: January 18, 1905. --- Decided: for oral argument January 30, 1905
Messrs. Hilary A. Herbert, Benjamin Micou, E. T. Davis, and Samuel S. Belden for petitioners.
Messrs. William A. Blount and A. C. Blount for respondents.
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McGregor v. Hogan

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
263 U.S. 234
McGregor v. Hogan
Argued: Oct. 9, 1923. --- Decided: Nov 12, 1923
Mr. L. D. McGregor, of Warrenton, Ga., for plaintiff in error.
Mr. E. P. Davis, of Warrenton, Ga., for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice SANFORD delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McGuffey's Eclectic Spelling Book/Preface

In revising this book, care has been taken to preserve all the excellences that have so long and so favorably distinguished McGUFFEY'S ECLECTIC SPELLING-BOOK: and the chief changes that have been made, have been suggested by the evident plan of the original work.
The old system of indicating the pronunciation by numerals, called "superiors," has been abandoned, and the diacritical marks used by Webster have been adopted. The Revised Speller conforms in orthography, pronunciation, and syllabication to the latest edition of Webster's Unabridged Dictionary. Exercises have been given on each of the distinctive marks used in the book, as will be seen by reference to Lessons 36-57.
A number of lessons have been added in the department of prefixes and suffixes, and now nearly all the more common of these etymological principles have been explained. (See Lessons 136-167.) In arranging the text of the several lessons, the object has been not to appeal merely to arbitrary memory, but to associate each lesson with some principle of sound, meaning, or accent, which would tend to aid the pupil in acquiring a knowledge of our language. Several distinct lessons on pronunciation are given, and towards the close of the book numerous lessons of difficult words in orthography have been introduced.
Instead of indicating silent letters by italics, as has hitherto been done, a new type has been made in which such letters are canceled, thus enabling the pupil to discover their status at a glance.
The pages have been enlivened, as in the other books of this Series, by attractive engravings.
The publishers take pleasure in acknowledging the valuable services of W. B. Watkins, D. D., who planned and executed this revision. DECEMBER, 1879.
16
Copyright, 1879, by Van Antwerp, Bragg & Co.
# Logan Banner 125 Year Anniversary

Source: 2013 Congressional Record, Vol. 159, Page E413 www.gpo.gov
LOGAN BANNER 125 YEAR ANNIVERSARY
HON. SILVESTRE REYES
OF WEST VIRGINIA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 10, 2013
Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor the work of a local newspaper in the heart of the coalfields of southern West Virginia. This year, the Logan Banner celebrates 125 years of excellence in journalism and service to the greater Logan County area and beyond.
For a century and a quarter, the Logan Banner has made banner headlines out of local and regional news stories that inform its readers on matters most important to them, what is happening in their own backyards.
In a world awash in news and information services, there is still no substitute for homegrown news coverage on the important events and happenings that only a local community paper can provide. From the city crime report to the latest little league scores, the Banner is the face of the community.
Through thick and thin, the Banner has operated as a reliable news source for Southern West Virginia's coal counties, and today, through subscription and on-line edition, the newspaper knows no geographic bounds around the globe.
Our Founders were quick to add in the first amendment to our Constitution, declaring Congress shall make no law to abridge the freedom of the press. Our Republic has been buoyed over the centuries by dedicated journalists doing a yeoman's task of reporting the news of the day regardless of whose ox is being gored. As a recent Banner editorial proclaimed, within its pages, the reader gets the good, the bad, and the ugly of insightful news impacting their lives.
Every member of the Logan Banner's team can take due pride in knowing that with every edition of the Banner they publish, they strengthen the bulwark of our Republic, a more informed citizen. Mr. Speaker, fellow colleagues, in recognition of its lasting contribution to our Nation, please join me in wishing Godspeed to the Logan Banner in its next 125 years of publishing.
____________________
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Logan County National Bank v. Townsend

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
139 U.S. 67
Logan County National Bank v. Townsend
W. F. Browder, for plaintiff in error.
John Feland, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Loewers Gambrinus Brewery Company v. Anderson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
282 U.S. 638
Loewers Gambrinus Brewery Company v. Anderson
Argued: Jan. 22, 1931. --- Decided: Feb 24, 1931
Messrs. Arthur B. Hyman, of New York City, and Karl D. Loos, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Mr. Claude R. Branch, of Providence, R. I., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Loftus v. Illinois

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
334 U.S. 804
Loftus v. Illinois
Argued: 26, 1948. --- Decided: June 14, 1948
Mr. Henry H. Fowler, of Knoxville, Tenn., for petitioner.
Mr. William C. Wines, of Chicago, Ill., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Logan Water

Burns' lyrics to the old tune of "Logan Water" were written in 1793 and published in George Thomson's A Select Collection of Original Scottish Airs in 1806. His version takes some inspiration from John Mayne's 1789 poem "Logan Braes".
* "Logan Water" in The Black-Bird Songster (1840s)
* "Logan Water" in Seven sentimental songs (1840s)
* "Logan Water" in The Book of Scottish Song (1843)
# Men-at-the-Bar/Brown, Edward Balcombe

​Brown, Edward Balcombe, B.A. Queen's Coll., Oxon, solicitor of the supreme court of Wellington, a student of Lincoln's Inn 4 May, 1877, went to the Inner Temple 20 Jan., 1880 (then aged 22), where he was called to the bar 17 Nov., 1880 (eldest son of William Robert Edward Brown, of Wellington, New Zealand, registrar-general of that colony); born , 1858.
    Wellington, New Zealand.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Brown, George Samuel

​Brown, George Samuel, M.A. Trin. Coll., Camb., matric. London Univ. 1861 from City of London School, a student of the Inner Temple 10 Nov., 1882 (then aged 40), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1883 (eldest son of late George Brown, of London, solicitor); born , 1842.
    9, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Brown, Henry Carnac

​Brown, Henry Carnac, B.A., LL.B., Trin. Hall, Camb., 1884, a student of Lincoln's Inn 12 Jan., 1880 (then aged 19), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1883 (2nd son of Francis Carnac Brown, Esq., late of Tellicherry, Madras, dec.); born , 1861.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Brown, Henry Clerke

​Brown, Henry Clerke, B.A. Christ Church, Oxon, a member of the Oxford circuit, a student of Lincoln's Inn 20 Nov., 1874, called to the bar 15 May, 1878 (eldest son of Arthur Henry Clerke, Esq., of Kingston Blount, Oxon); born 8 May, 1852.
    1, Temple Gardens, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Brown, James (?John) Crommelin

​Brown, James (?John) Crommelin, M.A. Edinburgh Univ., assistant commissioner Ferozepore, Punjab, a student of the Middle Temple 6 May, 1869, called to the bar 7 June, 1873 (only son of Sir John Campbell Brown, K.C.B., surgeon-general Bengal 1870–5); born , .
    16, Carlton Street, Edinburgh.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Brown, Charles Herbert

​Brown, Charles Herbert, equity draftsman and conveyancer, practises in Lancaster Chancery Court, a student of the Inner Temple 30 Oct., 1880 (then aged 27), called to the bar 6 June, 1883 (elder son of Rev. William Lawson Brown, late of Lytham, Lancashire, dec.); born 9 June, 1853.
    4, Stone Buildings, Lincoln's Inn; Farrar's Buildings, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Brown, Henry Rowland

​Brown, Henry Rowland, a student of Lincoln's Inn 14 Nov., 1863 (then aged 26), called to the bar 6 June, 1866 (3rd son of Edward Brown, of Lyme Regis, Dorset, gentleman); born , 1837.
    56, Lincoln's Inn Fields, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Brown, Archibald

​Brown, Archibald, M.A., B.C.L. Christ Church, Oxon, M.A. Edinburgh Univ., Pitt scholar, etc., editor of Snell's Principles of Equity, 7th edn., of Scriven on Copyholds, 6th edn., of Bainbridge's Law of Mines and Minerals, 4th edn., of Hunt's Law of Boundaries and Fences, 3rd edn., author of A New Law Dictionary, The Law of Fixtures, An Analysis of Savigny on Obligations, a student of the Middle Temple 2 Jan., 1868, certificate of honour Trin., 1870, called to the bar 17 Nov., 1870 (eldest son of James Brown, of Galashiels, co. Selkirk); born 8 May, 1841; married 20 Oct., 1879, Clara Marion Whitehouse.
    5, Chandos Square, Broadstairs; 21, Lansdowne Road, Notting Hill, W.; 8, New Square, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Brown, Douglas

​Brown, Douglas, Q.C., F.S.A., M.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1846, recorder of King's Lynn 1869–1885, J.P., D.L., Yorkshire North Riding, educated at Edinburgh Academy, a student of Lincoln's Inn 4 Nov., 1843 (then aged 23), called to the bar 6 May, 1847, Q.C. 23 June, 1869, bencher 2 Nov., 1869 (7th son of late Jonathan Brown, of Jamaica, merchant); born 9 April, 1820; married 13 Sept., 1853, Georgina Helen, dau. of William Mauleverer, Esq., of Arncliffe, Yorks, and has issue.
    Arncliffe Hall, Northallerton; Athenæeum Club.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Brown, Frederick

​Brown, Frederick, practises before the supreme court of Victoria, a student of Lincoln's Inn 18 April, 1861 (then aged 30), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1864 (2nd son of Benjamin Brown, Esq., late of Brighton, dec.); born , 1831.
    Beechworth. Victoria.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Amphlett, John

​Amphlett, John, M.A. Worcester Coll., Oxon, a member of the Oxford circuit, a student of the Inner Temple 29 Jan., 1867 (then aged 21), called to the bar 26 Jan., 1870 (only son of late John Amphlett, Esq., of Clent House, co. Staff.); born 22 March, 1845; married 18 Aug., 1869, Eliza Anne, only child of Edward Biven Baylie, Esq., of Clent Cottage, and has issue.
    Clent House, Stourbridge.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Amphlett, Richard Holmden

​Amphlett, Richard Holmden, M.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1873, a member of the Oxford circuit, a student of Lincoln's Inn 18 Nov., 1868 (then aged 21), called to the bar 6 June, 1871 (eldest son of Samuel Holmden Amphlett, of Birmingham, surgeon); born 24 April, 1847; married 14 July, 1877, Sophia Emily, younger dau. of John Shapter, Esq., Q.C., and has issue.
    8, Cleveland Road, Castle Hill, Ealing; 1, Tanfield Court, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Anderson, Andrew

​Anderson, Andrew, B.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1863, equity draftsman and conveyancer, a student of Lincoln's Inn 27 Jan., 1862 (then aged 22), called to the bar 9 June, 1865 (2nd son of Alexander Anderson, of Aberdeen, advocate); born , 1840.
    21, Old Buildings, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Anderson, Charles Henry

​Anderson, Charles Henry, a member of the South-eastern circuit, author of Examination Questions and Answers, a student of the Inner Temple 4 Nov., 1864 (then aged 26), exhibitioner Michaelmas, 1866, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1867 (youngest son of Rev. Richard Anderson, of the Grange, Bedale, Yorks); born , 1838.
    9, King's Bench Walk, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Amos, Sheldon

​Amos, Sheldon, M.A., Clare Hall, Camb., 1862, professor of jurisprudence Univ. Coll., London, 1869-79, also to Council of Legal Education Dec, 1872, to Dec., 1875, examiner in constitutional law and history of England for LL.B. in London Univ. 1872-7, author of Fifty Years of the English Constitution 1830-80, Remedies for War, Science of Law, Systematic View of Science of Jurisprudence, Law of Fixtures, Lectures on International Law, etc., a student of the Inner Temple 2 June, 1859 (then aged 24), called to the bar 11 June, 1862, certificate of honour 1862 (4th son of late Andrew Amos, Esq., of St. Ibbs, Hitchin, Herts); born 1 June, 1835; married 24 Dec, 1870, Sarah Maclardie, dau. of Thomas Perceval Bunting, Esq., of Manchester, and has issue.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Anderson, James (b.1839)

​Anderson, James, M.A. Edinburgh Univ., magistrate and collector Furreedpur, entered Bengal civil service 1861, a student of Lincoln's Inn 8 Nov., 1870 (then aged 31), called to the bar 6 June, 1872 (2nd son of late James Anderson, of Bleaton, Perth); born , 1839.
    Furreedpur, Bengal.