OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Luka Filipov

LUKA FILIPOV
(an incident of the montenegrin war of 1876-78)
One more hero to be part  Of the Servians' glory! Lute to lute and heart to heart  Tell the homely story; Let the Moslem hide for shame, Trembling like the falcon's game, Thinking on the falcon's name—  Luka Filipov.
When he fought with sword and gun  Doughty was he reckoned; When he was the foremost, none  Blushed to be the second. But he tired of the taint Of the Turk's blood, learned restraint From his sated sword—the quaint  Luka Filipov.
Thus he reasoned: Though they fall  Like the grass in mowing, Yet the dead Turks, after all,  Make a sorry showing. Foes that die remember not How our [[w:Montenegrins|]] bought Our unbroken freedom—thought  Luka Filipov.
So, in last year's battle-storm  Swooped our Servian falcon, Chose the sleekest of the swarm  From beyond the Balkan: Plucked a pacha from his horse, Carried him away by force, While we cheered along his course:  “Luka!” “Filipov!”
To the Prince his prize he bore  Just as he had won him— Laid him at the Prince's door,  Not a scratch upon him. “Prince, a present! And for fear He should find it lonely here, I will fetch his mate,” said queer  Luka Filipov.
Back into the fight he rushed  Where the Turks were flying, Past his kinsmen boldly brushed,  Leaping dead and dying: Seized a stalwart infidel, Wrenched his gun and, like a spell, Marched him back—him heeding well  Luka Filipov.
But the Moslems, catching breath  Mid their helter-skelter, Poured upon him hail of death  From a rocky shelter, Till a devil-guided ball Striking one yet wounded all: For there staggered, nigh to fall,  Luka Filipov!
Paused the conflict—all intent  On the two before us; And the Turkish regiment  Cheered in hideous chorus As the prisoner, half afraid, Turned and started up the glade, Thinking—dullard!—to evade  Luka Filipov.
We'd have fired but Luka's hand  Rose in protestation, While his pistol's mute command  Needed no translation; For the Turk retraced his track, Knelt and took upon his back (As a peddler shifts his pack)  Luka Filipov!
How we cheered him as he passed  Through the line, a-swinging Gun and pistol—bleeding fast—  Grim—but loudly singing: “Lucky me to find a steed Fit to give the Prince for speed! Rein or saddle ne'er shall need  Luka Filipov!”
So he urged him to the tent  Where the Prince was resting— Brought his captive, shamed and spent,  To make true his jesting. And as couriers came to say That our friends had won the day, Who should up and faint away?  Luka Filipov.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Luke (Bible)

Luke is a book of the Bible.
English-language translations of Kata Loukan include:
* "Lucas" (Old English translation)
* "Luke" in the Wycliffe version (first printing, c. 1384)
* "Luke" in the Wycliffe version (revised by Purvey et al., c. 1394)
* "Luke" in the Tyndale version (1526)
* "Luke" in the Coverdale version (1535)
* "Luke" in the Geneva version (1560)
* "Luke" in the Bishops' version (1568)
* "Luke" in the Douay–Rheims version (first printing, 1582–1610)
* "Luke" in the King James version (first printing, 1611)
* "Luke" in the Douay–Rheims version (illustrated version, 1633–1635)
* "Luke" in the Douay–Rheims version (Challoner's revision, 1749–1952)
* "Luke" in the King James version (Oxford text, 1769)
* "Luke" in the Thomson version (1808)
* "Luke" in the Webster's version (1833)
* "Luke" in the English Revised version (1885)
* "Luke" in the Young's Literal Translation version (1898)
* "Luke" in the American Standard version (1901)
* "Luke" in the King James version (tercentenary printing, 1911)
* "Luke" in the Emphasised Bible version (1916)
* "Luke" in the Basic English version (1941–1949)
* "Luke" in the World English version (in progress since 1997)
* "Luke" in the Wikisource edition (in progress since 2006)
* "Luke" in the Literal Standard Version (2020)

## See also

* Magnificat (Luke)
# Madrigal (Custance)

"Rare garden where my heart goes gathering"
* "Madrigal", in The Blue Bird (1905)
* "Madrigal", in The Inn of Dreams (1911)
# Madrigal à Ophélie

Young Ophelia fair, believe me; Whate'er the world may say, your glass may sing, Be satisfied to hear our praises ring; Always keep your modesty!
Fear the power of your charm; Seek not to abuse it; You will but be loved the more If you fear to lose it.
# Madruga v. Superior Court of California ex rel. San Diego County

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Reed
United States Supreme Court
346 U.S. 556
Madruga v. Superior Court of California ex rel. San Diego County
Argued: Oct. 19, 20, 1953. --- Decided: Jan 18, 1954
Mr. Eli H. Levenson, San Diego, Cal., for petitioner.
Mr. Northcutt Ely, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Madsen v. Kinsella

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
343 U.S. 341
Madsen v. Kinsella
Argued: Jan. 8, 1952. ---
[Syllabus from pages 341-342 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Joseph S. Robinson, New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Robert W. Ginnane, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BURTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Madsen v. Kinsella/Dissent Black

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Black
United States Supreme Court
343 U.S. 341
Madsen v. Kinsella
Argued: Jan. 8, 1952. ---
Mr. Justice BLACK, dissenting.
Petitioner, a United States citizen, is now serving a fifteen-year sentence for murdering her husband. At the time of the alleged crime, she was living in the United States Area of Control in Germany with her husband who was an Air Force lieutenant on active duty in Germany. It appears that the court that tried her and the law she was judged by were not established or authorized by the Congress. Executive officers acting under presidential authority created the system of courts that tried her, promulgated the edicts she was convicted of violating, and appointed the judges who took away her liberty.
The very first Article of the Constitution begins by saying that 'All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress' and no part of the Constitution contains a provision specifically authorizing the President to create courts to try American citizens. Whatever may be the scope of the President's power as Commander in Chief of the Fighting armed forces, I think that if American citizens in present-day Germany are to be tried by the American Government, they should be tried under laws passed by Congress and in courts created by Congress under its constitutional authority.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Maguire v. Reardon/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
255 U.S. 271
Maguire v. Reardon
Argued: Jan. 28, 1921. --- Decided: Feb 28, 1921
Defendants in error, officers and agents of the City of San Francisco, purporting to act under an ordinance approved May 8, 1917, gave notice of their intention to demolish and remove a wooden building on Van Ness avenue, the property of plaintiffs in error. Thereupon the latter instituted this proceeding for an injunction upon the ground, among others, that as the building was lawfully erected the ordinance violated the federal Constitution.
The court below, following Bancroft v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co., 166 Cal. 416, 137 Pac. 18, held that the building was erected in 1906 within the fire limits theretofore prescribed in violation of valid local regulations duly enacted under the charter, and consequently there could be no reasonable doubt of the municipality's power to direct its removal.
The meaning and effect of the charter and ordinances thereunder are questions of local law determination of which by the state courts we commonly accept as conclusive. It is admitted that the building was constructed within defined fire limits, and the Supreme Court of the state has said this was contrary to valid regulations then in force. The challenged ordinance must therefore be treated as affecting an unlawful structure, and as so applied we can find no plausible ground for holding it in conflict with the federal Constitution.
Affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Maguire v. Trefry

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Clark McReynolds
United States Supreme Court
253 U.S. 12
Maguire v. Trefry
Argued: March 24, 1920. --- Decided: April 26, 1920
Mr. Richard W. Hale, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Wm. Harold Hitchcock, of Boston, Mass., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice DAY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Maguire v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
313 U.S. 1
Maguire v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Argued: March 5, 6, 1941. --- Decided: March 31, 1941
See 313 U.S. 598, 61 S.Ct. 936, 85 L.Ed. --.
Messrs. Francis E. Baldwin and Albert H. Veeder, both of Chicago, Ill., for petitioners.
Helen R. Carloss, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Maguire v. Trefry/Dissent Clark McReynolds

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Clark McReynolds
United States Supreme Court
253 U.S. 12
Maguire v. Trefry
Argued: March 24, 1920. --- Decided: April 26, 1920
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Maguire v. Reardon

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
255 U.S. 271
Maguire v. Reardon
Argued: Jan. 28, 1921. --- Decided: Feb 28, 1921
Mr. J. F. Riley, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Maurice T. Dooling, Jr., and George Lull, both of San Francisco, Cal., for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Maguire v. Card

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
62 U.S. 248
Maguire v. Card
THIS case was brought up by appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of California.
It was a case in admiralty, which arose in this way:
C. K. & William Garrison supplied the steamer Goliah with coal, and then assigned the claim to Card. The lien held by the Garrisons was created by the local law of California, (sec. 317, p. 576, Compiled Laws.) The claimant excepted to the libel, on the ground that the libellant was but the assignee of those with whom the contract was made by the master of the vessel, and that he had no lien. The District Court overruled this exception, and gave judgment in favor of the libellant; and this judgment was affirmed by the Circuit Court, on appeal. The vessel was engaged in trade exclusively within the State of California.
It was argued in this court by Mr. Blair for the appellant, and Mr. Doyle for the appellee.
Mr. Blair contended that an assignee had no right to sue under the statute, and that the court below had no jurisdiction, because the assignee had no maritime contract with the ship.
Mr. Doyle stated the questions to be—
1. Had Garrison & Co. a lien, or jus in re, on the boat?
2. Was that a lien capable of being assigned?
The precise question of jurisdiction, as decided by this court, was not argued by the counsel on either side.
Mr. Justice NELSON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/(Jung) Ahsgar, Ali (Nawab Syad)

​(Jung) Ahsgar, Ali (Nawab Syad), Khan Bahadoor, C.S.I., practises before the High Court of Calcutta, a student of the Middle Temple 1 May, 1866, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1869 (eldest son of Nawab Tuhower Jung, of Calcutta); born , .
    Calcutta.
# Men-at-the-Bar/(Wadia), Cursetjee Rustomjee

​(Wadia), Cursetjee Rustomjee, matric. London Univ. 1872, assistant collector and magistrate at Gorakhpur, Allahabad, a student of the Middle Temple 13 Nov., 1874, called to the bar 17 Nov., 1882 [eldest son of Rustomjee Ardaseer (Wadia), of Bombay, shipbuilder]; born , 1855.
    Gorakhpur, Allahabad, North-west Provinces India.
# Men-at-the-Bar/(Venkatachelliah), Meenacshaya (Cumbhumpati)

​(Venkatachelliah), Meenacshaya (Cumbhumpati), of the Univ. of Madras, a student of Lincoln's Inn 19 May, 1873 (then aged 30), called to the bar 10 May, 1876 (eldest son of Cumbhumpati Venkatachelliah, late native judge Tinnevelly district, Madras, dec.); born , 1843.
# Men-at-the-Bar/(Venkatachelliah), Sabapathi lyah (Cumbhumpati)

​(Venkatachelliah), Sabapathi lyah (Cumbhumpati), matric. Madras Univ., a pleader in civil and sessions court of Caddappuh, a student of Lincoln's Inn 11 June, 1872 (then aged 28), called to the bar 6 June, 1874 (2nd son of Cumbhumpati Venkatachelliah, latenative judge of Tinnevelly); born , .
# Men-at-the-Bar/(Furhut), Abdul Haleem

​(Furhut), Abdul Haleem, matric, Calcutta Univ. and High School, Benares, practises before the High Court at Calcutta, a student of the Middle Temple 18 May, 1877, called to the bar 21 April, 1880 (7th son of Syad Furhut, Ali, of Mirzapore, landholder); born , 1855.
    Calcutta.
# Men-at-the-Bar/(Venkatachelliah), Akilandaiya (Cumbhumpati)

​(Venkatachelliah), Akilandaiya (Cumbhumpati), B.A. Madras, practises before the High Court of Madras, a student of the Inner Temple 22 Jan., 1880 (then aged 36), lecture prize Dec, 1881, called to the bar 17 Nov., 1882 (3rd son of late Judge Cumbhumpati Venkatachelliah, of Madras); born , 1844.
    Madras.
# Men-at-the-Bar/(Furhut), Mahomed Serajuddin

​(Furhut), Mahomed Serajuddin, late of Calcutta Univ., practises before the High Court at Calcutta, a student of the Middle Temple 18 May, 1877, called to the bar 21 April, 1880 (8th son of Syad Furhut Ali, of Mirzapore, East Indies, landowner); born , 1857.
    Calcutta.
# Men-at-the-Bar/(Jung) Ahmud, Ali (Nawab Syad)

​(Jung) Ahmud, Ali (Nawab Syad), a student of the Middle Temple 1 May, 1866, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1869 (2nd son of Nawab Tuhower Jung, of Calcutta); born , .
    Calcutta.
# Magdalen

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Magdalen."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Magdalen, a novel by Josef Svatopluk Machar (1916)
* The Magdalen, anonymous tracts
# Magdalen (Machar)

* related portals: Czech literature.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Czech original Magdalena is a verse novel, this translation is a pure prose
MAGDALEN
AUTHORIZED TRANSLATION FROM THE BOHEMIAN OF J· S· MACHAR
BY LEO WIENER
PROFESSOR OF SLAVIC LANGUAGES AND LITERATURES AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY
NEW YORK MITCHELL KENNERLEY 1916
* Introductory note
* Chapter 1
* Chapter 2
* Chapter 3
* Chapter 4
* Chapter 5
* Chapter 6
* Chapter 7
* Chapter 8
* Chapter 9
* Chapter 10
* Chapter 11
* Chapter 12
copyright 1916 by mitchell kennerley
printed in america
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# McCormick v. Gray

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
54 U.S. 26
McCormick v. Gray

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McCormick v. Burnet/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
283 U.S. 784
McCormick v. Burnet
The question in this case is that of the construction of section 402(c) of the revenue act of 1921, c. 136, 42 Stat. 227, 278, a provision similar to that of section 402(c) of the Revenue Act of 1918, c. 18, 40 Stat. 1057, 1097, which has already been construed by this Court, and, in this view, there being no question of the constitutional anthority of the Congress to impose prospectively a tax with respect to transfers or trusts of the sort here involved, the judgment of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (43 F.(2d) 277) is reversed upon the authority of May v. Heiner, 281 U.S. 238, 50 S.C.t. 286, 74 L. Ed. 826, 67 A. L. R. 1244.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McCormick Company v. Brown

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
286 U.S. 131
McCormick Company v. Brown
Argued: April 22, 1932. --- Decided: May 16, 1932
[Syllabus from pages 131-133 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Philip C. Friese, of Baltimore, Md., and H. D. Rummel, of Charleston, W. Va., for appellants.
Messrs. W. G. Brown, of Summersville, W. Va., and R. Dennis Steed, of Charleston, W. Va., for appellees.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McCormick Harvesting Machine Company v. Walthers

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
134 U.S. 41
McCormick Harvesting Machine Company v. Walthers
Walter J. Lam and Ricketts & Wilson, for plaintiff in error.
Nathan S. Harwood and John H. Ames, for defendant in error.
FULLER, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# McCormick v. Burnet

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
283 U.S. 784
McCormick v. Burnet
Mr. Robert N. Miller, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
The Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Men-at-the-Bar/Denniss, Edmund Robert Hartley

​Denniss, Edmund Robert Hartley, a member of the Northern circuit, undergrad. Hertford Coll., Oxon, sometime of the legacy duty office Somerset House, a student of the Middle Temple 16 Jan., 1877, called to the bar 17 Nov., 1879 (eldest son of Edmund Pinnock Denniss, of London); born , .
    Holmdale, Hendon, N.; 1, Essex Court, Temple, E.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Dent, John Coucher

​Dent, John Coucher, F.S.A., J.P. cos. Worcester and Gloucester (sheriff 1859), undergrad. Magdalen Coll., Oxon, from Eton, a student of the Inner Temple 27 Jan., 1841 (then aged 21), called to the bar 20 Nov., 1846 (eldest son of Thomas Dent, Esq., of Worcester); born , 1819; married 16 Sept., 1847, Emma, eldest dau. of late John Brocklehurst, of Hurdsfield, Cheshire, M.P.
    Sudeley Castle, Winchcomb; Conpervative Club, S.W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Dent, John Dent

​Dent, John Dent, M.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1851, from Eton, chairman of Northeastern Railway Company since 1880, M.P. Knaresborough 1852-7, Scarborough 1857-74, late capt. Yorkshire hussars, J.P., D.L. Yorks West Riding, a student of Lincoln's Inn 19 April, 1844 (then aged 17), called to the bar 14 Nov., 1851 (son of Joseph Dent, of Ribston Park, Yorks, J.P., D.L.); born 11 June, 1826; married 10 July, 1855, Mary Hebden, dau. of John Woodall, Esq., of Scarborough, and has issue.
    Ribston Hall, Wetherby, Yorks; Winterton, Brigg, co. Lincoln.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Derbishire, Thomas Henry

​Derbishire, Thomas Henry, a student of the Middle Temple 15 Nov., 1851, called to the bar 26 Jan., 1856 (youngest son of Stewart Derbishire, Esq., of Gray's Inn); born , .
    Care of 51, St. George's Road, S.W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Dent, Francis

​Dent, Francis, B.A., Balliol Coll., Oxon, 1883, a student of the Inner Temple 25 Oct., 1881 (then aged 21), called to the bar 17 June, 1885 (2nd son of John Dent Dent, Esq., of Ribston Hall, Yorks); born 11 Aug., 1860.
    Ribston Hall, Wetherby.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Dent, Henry William

​Dent, Henry William, a member of the South-eastern circuit, a student of Gray's Inn 25 Oct., 1866, of the Inner Temple 9 Nov., 1868 (then aged 34), called to the bar at the Inner Temple 11 June, 1869 (3rd son of late Robert Dent. Esq., of London, dec.); born 1834.
    47, Bernard Street, Russell Square, W.C.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Dering, George Edwardes

​Dering, George Edwardes, B.A., Magdalen Coll., Oxon, 1863, recorder of Faversham since 1872, assessor of Romney, a member of the South-eastern circuit, educated at Winchester, a student of the Middle Temple 11 Nov., 1861, called to the bar 9 June, 1865 (3rd son of Sir Edward Dering, of Surrenden Dering, Kent, Bart.); born 12 Jan., 1841; married 1st, , 1868, Jane Alice, dau. of late Thomas Taylor, Esq.; she died 13 June, 1874; he married 2ndly, 12 Jan., 1882, Pauline, eldest dau. of late Rev. William Lewis Mason, chaplain in Mauritius, etc., and has issue (see Foster's Baronetage).
    103, Edith Road West, Kensington, W.; 1, Brick Court, Temple, E.C.; United University Club, S.W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Dennis, Alfred Hull

​Dennis, Alfred Hull, B.A., Exeter Coll., Oxon, 1882, a student of the Inner Temple 17 June, 1882 (then aged 23), equity pupil scholarship Feb., 1884, called to the bar 29 April, 1885 (eldest son of John Dennis, Esq., of Hampstead, Middlesex); born , 1857.
    Gardnor House, Gardnor Road, Hampstead, N.W.
# Men-at-the-Bar/Dent, Thomas Wilkinson John

​Dent, Thomas Wilkinson John, M.A., Trin. Coll., Camb., 1856, a student of Lincoln's Inn 13 April, 1853 (then aged 22), called to the bar 17 Nov., 1860 (eldest son of Robert Dent, Esq., late of London, dec.); born , 1831; married 3 Sept., 1861, Sophia Amelia, eldest dau. of Rev. George John Collinson, incumbent of St. James', Clapham.
    Manor House, Limpsfield, Godstone, Surrey.