OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Fourco Glass Company v. Transmirra Products Corporation

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
353 U.S. 222
Fourco Glass Company v. Transmirra Products Corporation
Argued: April 2, 1957. --- Decided: April 29, 1957
Mr.
Edward S. Irons, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. W. R. Hulbert, Boston, Mass., for respondents.
Mr. Justice WHITTAKER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fourie and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Another

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Fourie and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Another."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Fourie and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Another (High Court, 2002)
* Fourie and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Another (Constitutional Court, 2003)
* Fourie and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Another (Supreme Court of Appeal, 2004)
* Minister of Home Affairs and Another v Fourie and Another (Constitutional Court, 2005)
# Fourche River Lumber Company v. Bryant Lumber Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
230 U.S. 316
Fourche River Lumber Company v. Bryant Lumber Company
Argued: May 6, 1913. --- Decided: June 9, 1913
Messrs. Luther M. Walter, W. E. Hemingway, M. W. Borders, J. E. Louthborough, D. H. Cantrell, G. B. Rose, and U. M. Rose for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Charles C. Reid and T. M. Mehaffy for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 317 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Lamar delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Neustadt

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
366 U.S. 696
United States v. Neustadt
Argued: May 2, 1961. --- Decided: May 29, 1961
Mr. William H. Orrick, Jr., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.
Mr. Lawrence J. Latto, Washington, D.C., for respondents.
Mr. Justice WHITTAKER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Nevada

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Nevada."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Nevada (409 U.S. 921), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
* United States v. Nevada (412 U.S. ???), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
   * listing incomplete
# United States v. Ness

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
245 U.S. 319
United States v. Ness
Argued: Nov. 5, 1917. --- Decided: Dec 10, 1917
Mr. Solicitor General Davis, of Washington, D. C., for the United states.
Mr. Denis M. Kelleher, of Ft. Dodge, Iowa, for respondent.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. White (322 U.S. 694)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
322 U.S. 694
United States v. White (322 U.S. 694)
Argued: March 6, 1944. --- Decided: June 12, 1944
Tom C. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Mr. Robert J. Fitzsimmons, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice MURPHY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. White (401 U.S. 745)/Concurrence Brennan

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Brennan
* Dissenting Opinions Douglas Brennan Harlan
United States Supreme Court
401 U.S. 745
United States v. White (401 U.S. 745)
Argued: Nov. 10, 1969. --- Decided: Oct 20, 1970
Mr. Justice BRENNAN, concurring in the result.
I agree that Desist v. United States, 394 U.S. 244, 89 S.Ct. 1030, 22 L.Ed.2d 248 (1969), requires reversal of the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Therefore, a majority of the Court supports disposition of this case on that ground. However, my Brothers DOUGLAS, HARLAN, and WHITE also debate the question whether On Lee v. United States, 343 U.S. 747, 72 S.Ct. 967, 96 L.Ed. 1270 (1952), may any longer be regarded as sound law. My Brother WHITE argues that On Lee is still sound law. My Brothers DOUGLAS and HARLAN argue that it is not. Neither position commands the support of a majority of the Court. For myself, I agree with my Brothers DOUGLAS and HARLAN. But I go further. It is my view that the reasoning of both my Brothers DOUGLAS and HARLAN compels the conclusion that Lopez v. United States, 373 U.S. 427, 83 S.Ct. 1381, 10 L.Ed.2d 462 (1963), is also no longer sound law. In other words, it is my view that current Fourth Amendment jurisprudence interposes a warrant requirement not only in cases of third-party electronic monitoring (the situation in On Lee and in this case) but also in cases of electronic recording by a government agent of a face-to-face conversation with a criminal suspect, which was the situation in Lopez. For I adhere to the dissent in Lopez, 373 U.S., at 446-471, 83 S.Ct., at 1392-1405, in which, to quote my Brother HARLAN, post, at 778 n. 12, 'the doctrinal basis of our subsequent Fourteenth Amendment decisions may be said to have had its genesis.' Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967), adopted that 'doctrinal basis' and thus, it seems to me, agreed with the argument in the Lopez dissent that 'subsequent decisions and subsequent experience have sapped whatever vitality (On Lee) may once have had; that it should now be regarded as overruled' and that the situation in Lopez 'is rationally indistinguishable.' 373 U.S., at 447, 83 S.Ct., at 1392. The reasons in support of those conclusions are set forth fully in the Lopez dissent and need not be repeated here. It suffices to say that for those reasons I remain of the view that the Fourth Amendment imposes the warrant requirement in both the On Lee and Lopez situations.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. White

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. White."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. White (64 U.S. 249), ( 15 L.Ed. 560 ), ( 23 How. 249 )
* United States v. White (322 U.S. 694), ( 88 L.Ed. 1542 ), ( 64 S.Ct. 1248 )
* United States v. White (401 U.S. 745), ( 28 L.Ed.2d 453 ), ( 91 S.Ct. 1122 )
* United States v. White (??? U.S. ???), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
* United States v. White (??? U.S. ???), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
   * listing incomplete
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/26th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 49

Chap. XLIX.—An Act to annex a certain tract of land to the Coosa land district, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Certain land annexed to the Coosa land district. That such part of township twenty-two, of range two, east, northern survey, State of Alabama, as lies east of the Coosa river, and was ceded to the United States by the Creek nation of Indians, by a treaty concluded on the ninth day of August, eighteen hundred and fourteen, be, and the same is hereby annexed to the Coosa land district;Surveys, sales, &c. valid, how far. and all surveys, sales, and other proceedings heretofore had in reference to said tract hereby annexed as aforesaid, shall be as valid as they would have been had the same, at the time such proceedings were had, formed a part of said district, and no farther.
Approved, July 20, 1840.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/26th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 50

Chap. L.—An Act to provide for the support of the Military Academy for the year eighteen hundred and forty.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the following sums be, and the same are hereby, appropriated, to be paid out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the support of the Military Academy for the year one thousand eight hundred and forty, viz.:
Pay.For pay of officers, cadets, and musicians, fifty-nine thousand two hundred and twenty-eight dollars;
​Subsistence.For subsistence of officers and cadets, forty thousand and four dollars;
Forage of officers’ horses.For forage of officers’ horses, three thousand nine hundred and thirty-six dollars;
Clothing of officers’ servants.For clothing of officers’ servants, three hundred and ninety dollars;
Board of visiters.For defraying the expenses of the Board of Visiters at West Point, two thousand dollars;
Fuel, &c.For fuel, forage, stationery, printing, transportation and postage, twelve thousand nine hundred and thirty-one dollars and forty-five cents;
Repairs, &c.For repairs, improvements, and expenses of buildings, grounds, roads, wharves, boats, and fences, seven thousand seven hundred and fifty-seven dollars and fifty cents;
Clerks.For pay of adjutants and disbursing officer’s clerks, nine hundred and fifty dollars;
Library.For increase and expenses of the library, one thousand dollars;
Binding books.For binding books, injured at the fire in February, eighteen hundred and thirty-eight, and imported stitched, three hundred dollars;
Miscellaneous.For miscellaneous items and incidental expenses, seven hundred and twenty-six dollars and twenty-five cents;
Engineering.For the department of engineering, five hundred dollars;
Philosophy.For the department of philosophy, seven hundred and fifteen dollars and twenty-five cents;
Chemistry.For the department of chemistry, seven hundred and twenty-four dollars and seventy-five cents;
Drawing.For the department of drawing, three hundred and thirty-eight dollars and seventy-five cents;
Tactics.For the department of tactics, two hundred and forty dollars;
Artillery.For the department of artillery, three hundred and ten dollars;
Commander of cadets to be instructor of infantry tactics, or, &c.—his pay.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the commander of the Corps of Cadets at the Military Academy, shall be either the instructor of infantry tactics, of cavalry and artillery tactics, or of practical engineering, and that his pay and emoluments shall in no case be less than the compensation allowed by law to the professor of mathematics; and that the pay and emoluments of the instructors in these branches shall in no case be less than is allowed by law to the assistant professor of mathematics.
Compensation of assistant professors of ethics.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That the assistant professors of ethics shall be allowed the same compensation as is now allowed by law to the other asisstant professors in the institution.
Approved, July 20, 1840.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/26th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 47

Chap. XLVII.—An Act to amend the act, approved May thirteenth, eighteen hundred, entitled “An act to amend an act entitled ‘An act to establish the judicial courts of the United States.’”
Act of May 13, 1800, ch. 61. Jurors of U.S. courts in each State to have like qualifications, &c. 1841, ch. 38.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That jurors to serve in the courts of the United States, in each State respectively, shall have the like qualifications, and be entitled to the like exemptions, as jurors of the highest court of law of such State now have and are entitled to, and shall hereafter from time to time have and be entitled to, and shall be designated by ballot, lot, or otherwise, according to the mode of forming such juries now practised and hereafter to be practised therein, in so far as such mode may be practicable by the courts of the United States, or the officers thereof; and further, shall have power, by rule or order, from time to time, to conform the same to any change in these respects which may be hereafter adopted by the Legislatures of the respective States for the State courts.
Approved, July 20, 1840.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/26th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 44

Chap. XLIV.—An Act to remove the land office from Chocchuma to Grenada, in the State of Mississippi.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,The registers and receivers to remove the books, &c. within sixty days. That the land office at Chocchuma, in the county of Tallahatchie, State of Mississippi, shall be removed to and located in the town of Grenada, in Yalabusha county, in said State; and it shall be the duty of the registers and the receivers of public money for said land office, within sixty days from and after the passage of this act, to remove the books, records, and whatever else belongs to said office, to the place of location, as herein provided for.
Approved, July 4, 1840.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/26th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 42

Chap. XLII.—An Act to amend an act approved the eighteenth of January eighteen hundred and thirty-nine, entitled “An act to amend an act entitled ‘An act to require the judge of the district of East and West Tennessee to hold a court at Jackson in said State,’ approved June the eighteenth, eighteen hundred and thirty-eight,” and for other purposes.
Act of Jan. 18, 1839, ch. 3. Act of June 18, 1838, ch. 118. Two terms to be held annually. Rule days.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the first Monday in April, eighteen hundred and forty, there shall be two terms of said court held annually by the district judge at Jackson, on the second Monday in December next, and the second Monday in June then following; and the rule days of said court for the return of process and filing of pleadings shall be held on the second Monday of September and March, in each and every year.
7th sec. act of 18th Jan. 1839, ch. 3, repealed.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the seventh section of the act which this is intended to amend, be, and the same is hereby, repealed.
An additional term of the circuit court to be held in Knoxville.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That an additional term of the circuit court of the United States shall be holden in Knoxville, in East Tennessee, on the third Monday in April in each and every year, which said term shall be held by the district judge; and should any difficult point of law arise, at said April term, in any cause or matter of controversy in said court, the said district judge may,The judge may adjourn a cause to next term. at his discretion, adjourn the same over to the next term.
Approved, July 4, 1840.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/26th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 5

Chap. V.—An Act additional to the act on the subject of Treasury Notes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Act of 12th Oct. 1837, ch. 2, &c. renewed. That the regulations and provisions contained in the act passed the twelfth day of October, in the year one thousand eight hundred and thirty-seven, entitled “An act to authorize the issuing of Treasury Notes,” and in the subsequent acts in addition thereto, be, and the same are hereby, renewed, and made in full force, excepting the limitations concerning the times within which such notes may be issued, and restricting the amount thereof as hereafter provided.
Treasury notes may be issued in lieu of others redeemed.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That under the regulations and provisions contained in said act, Treasury Notes may be issued in lieu of others hereafter or heretofore redeemed, but not to exceed in the amount of notes outstanding at any one time, the aggregate of five millions of dollars; and to be redeemed sooner than one year, if the means of the Treasury will permit, by giving notice sixty days of those notes which the Department is ready to redeem; no interest to be allowed thereon after the expiration of said sixty days.
Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That this act shall continue in force one year and no longer.
Approved, March 31, 1840.
# Gospel of Buddha (1917)/Māra, the Evil One

XI.
MĀRA THE EVIL ONE.
The Holy One directed his steps to that blessed Bodhi-tree beneath whose shade he was to accomplish his search.1
As he walked, the earth shook and a brilliant light transfigured the world.2
When he sat down the heavens resounded with joy and all living beings were filled with good cheer.3
Māra alone, lord of the five desires, bringer of death and enemy of truth, was grieved and rejoiced not. With his three daughters, Tanhā, Ragā and Arati, the tempters, and with his host of evil demons, he went to the place where the great samana sat. But Sakyamuni heeded him not.4
Māra uttered fear-inspiring threats and raised a whirlwind so that the skies were darkened and the ocean roared and trembled. But the Blessed One under the Bodhi-tree remained calm and feared not. The Enlightened One knew that no harm could befall him.5
The three daughters of Māra tempted the Bodhisatta, but he paid no attention to them, and when Māra saw that he could kindle no desire in the heart of the victorious samana, he ordered all the evil spirits at his command to attack him and overawe the great muni.6
But the Blessed One watched them as one would watch the harmless games of children. All the fierce hatred of the evil spirits was of no avail. The flames of hell became
​wholesome breezes of perfume, and the angry thunderbolts were changed into lotus-blossoms.7
When Māra saw this, he fled away with his army from the Bodhi-tree, whilst from above a rain of heavenly flowers fell, and voices of good spirits were heard:8
"Behold the great muni! his heart unmoved by hatred. The wicked Māra's host 'gainst him did not prevail. Pure is he and wise, loving and full of mercy.9
"As the rays of the sun drown the darkness of the world, so he who perseveres in his search will find the truth and the truth will enlighten him."10
# Gudewife, Count the Lawin

* Gudewife, Count The Lawin
* Gane is the day, and mirk's the night,
* But we'll ne'er stray for faut o' light;
* Gude ale and bratdy's stars and moon,
* And blue-red wine's the risin' sun.
* Chorus.-Then gudewife, count the lawin,
* The lawin, the lawin,
* Then gudewife, count the lawin,
* And bring a coggie mair.
* There's wealth and ease for gentlemen,
* And simple folk maun fecht and fen';
* But here we're a' in ae accord,
* For ilka man that's drunk's a lord.
* Then gudewife, &c.
* My coggie is a haly pool
* That heals the wounds o' care and dool;
* And Pleasure is a wanton trout,
* An ye drink it a', ye'll find him out.
* Then gudewife, &c.
* 1790
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Guendolen

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Guendolen."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Guendolen", a poem by Edith May
* "Guendolen", a poem by Celia Thaxter
# Watts v. Seward School Board

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Watts v. Seward School Board."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Watts v. Seward School Board (381 U.S. 126)
* Watts v. Seward School Board (391 U.S. 592)
# Watts v. Lindsey's

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
20 U.S. 158
Watts v. Lindsey's
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Ohio.
This cause was argued by Mr. Doddridge for the appellant, and by Mr. Brush for the respondents.
Mr. Justice TODD delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Watts v. Seward School Board (381 U.S. 126)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
381 U.S. 126
Watts v. Seward School Board
George Kaufmann, for petitioners.
George N. Hayes, for respondent Seward School Board.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Watts v. Indiana ex rel. Harris/Concurrence Black

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Black Douglas Jackson
United States Supreme Court
338 U.S. 49
Watts v. Indiana ex rel. Harris
Mr. Justice BLACK concurs in the judgment of the Court on the authority of Chambers v. State of Florida, 309 U.S. 227, 60 S.Ct. 472, 84 L.Ed. 716; Ashcraft v. State of Tennessee, 322 U.S. 143, 64 S.Ct. 921, 88 L.Ed. 1192.
On the records before us and in view of the consideration given to the evidence by the state courts and the conclusion reached, THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Mr. Justice REED and Mr. Justice BURTON believe that the judgments should be affirmed in all three cases.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Watts v. Indiana ex rel. Harris

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinions

    Black
    Douglas
    Jackson
United States Supreme Court
338 U.S. 49
Watts v. Indiana ex rel. Harris
On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana.
On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the State of South Carolina.
On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Messrs. Thurgood Marshall, Franklin H. Williams, New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Frank E. Coughlin, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER announced the judgment of the Court and an opinion in which Mr. Justice MURPHY and Mr. Justice RUTLEDGE join.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse