OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Southworth v. United States (161 U.S. 639)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
161 U.S. 639
Southworth v. United States
Geo. A. King and Lewis Abraham, for appellant.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Dodge, for the United States.
Mr. Justice BREWER delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Souvenir

You ask me, "Do you think of me?"
* "Souvenir" in The New Penelope (1877)
* "Souvenir" in Poems (1900)
# Stow v. Chicago

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
104 U.S. 547
Stow v. Chicago
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
The facts are stae d in the opinion of the court.
Submitted on printed arguments by Mr. L. Hill for the appellant, and by Mr. Lester L. Bond for the appellee.
MR. JUSTICE WOODS delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Stovall v. Denno
## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
388 U.S. 293
Stovall v. Denno
Argued: Feb. 16, 1967. --- Decided: June 12, 1967
Leon B. Polsky, New York City, for petitioner.
William Cahn, Mineola, N.Y., for respondent.
H. Richard Uviller, New York City, for New York State District Attorney's Ass'n, as amicus curiae.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Stowe letter to Horace Mann

Letter sent to congressman Horace Mann, dealing with her new book, Uncle Tom's Cabin

## March 2, 1852

Hon. Horace Mann
Dear Sir
Some months ago you addressed me a note for which I was at the time exceedingly grateful & to which I intended to reply when time should enable me to test the advice you were kind enough to send me.
To day I have taken my pen from the last chapter of "Uncle Tom's Cabin" & I think you will understand me when I say that I feel as if I had written some of it almost with my hearts blood—I look upon it almost as a despairing appeal to civilized humanity - in the close of it I think you may trace the result of some of your suggestions.
It has been the most cheering thing about the whole endeavor to me, that men like you, would feel it -for so deeply has the cause I speak for enwoven itself with my life, that sympathy for that, seems to me almost a personal favor.
May I now ask you to favor me with your advice on another head—It is my wish to present copies to several distinguished persons in England—among others T.B. McAule, the Earl of Carlysle whose very sensible remarks on slavery I remember with pleasure, to Charles Dickens & lastly to Prince Albert.
Were the subject any other I should think this impertinent & Egotistical — as it is, I have thus settled it with myself—it may be that they will read it - & if they read it, they must think & feel somewhat—& if they are too busy to read it there is no harm done & its no matter at all to me, what they think—The very oddity of the fact that an American woman has sent them a book may inspire some curiosity to see what a native can do & thus ensure a reading.
Can you give me any advice as to the best mode of forwarding &c—perhaps your diplomatic life in Washington may enable you to enlighten my rusticity a little on these points—I have just been reading your volume of speeches—It is with a sad feeling that I think that things like what are there recorded have been said in the legislative bodies & men have heard them & gone on—just as before—"ceace ye from man" 3.
Were it not for my faith in the Ever living—whose hour is certainly coming—I could see no use in living—as it is I have this comfort that every blow on the right side is telling & the final victory is certain
Yours very truly,
       HB Stowe
My direction is in Brunswick Maine
# Struthers v. Drexel

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
122 U.S. 487
Struthers v. Drexel

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Stroud v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
251 U.S. 380
Stroud v. United States
Petition for Rehearing Received Jan. 5, 1920.
Decided Jan. 19, 1920.
Messrs. Isaac B. Kimbrell and Martin J. O'Donnell, both of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff in error on petition for rehearing.
Memorandum opinion by direction of the Court, by Mr. Justice DAY.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Struggle

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Struggle."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "The Struggle" (1942, "Life is a struggle for peace"), a poem by Edgar A. Guest
* "Struggle" ("My soul is like the oar that momently"), a poem by Sidney Lanier
* "The Struggle" (1915, "I have been down in a dark valley"), a poem by Don Marquis
# Struggle (Lanier)

My soul is like the oar that momently  Dies in a desperate stress beneath the wave, Then glitters out again and sweeps the sea:  Each second I’m new-born from some new grave.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Story v. Black/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
119 U.S. 235
Story v. Black
This is a writ of error to the supreme court of the territory of Montana, to bring up for review the judgment in a suit where there was not a trial by jury. Under the act of April 7, 1874, c. 80, § 2, (18 St. pt. 8, p. 27,) the case should have been brought up by appeal, and the writ of error is therefore dismissed. Hecht v. Boughton, 105 U.S. 235; U.S. v. Railroad Co., Id. 263; Woolf v. Hamilton, 108 U.S. 15; S.C.. 1 Sup. Ct. Rep. 139. The question is no longer open in this court. The statutory rule is jurisdictional.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Story v. Black

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
119 U.S. 235
Story v. Black
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Storys of The bewitched fiddler (1)

The date is estimated
STORYS OF
the
BEWITCHED FIDDLER,
PERILOUS SITUATION,
and
JOHN HETHERINGTON'S DREAM.
GLASGOW: printed for the booksellers.
* The Bewitched Fiddler
* A Perilous Situation
* John Hetherington's Dream
* Anecdote
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Story v. Strettell

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Story and Wharton versus Amos Strettell.
Sur Policy of Insurance. The Captain’s Protest in Jamaica under the Seal of a Notary Publick there, given in Evidence to prove the Capture, and not opposed.
Instructions from the Plaintiffs (Owners of the Vessel insured) to the Captain af the Time of his sailing, sworn by the Captain to be the only Instructions he had, were given in Evidence by the Plaintiffs, to prove they had given the Captain no Orders to buy the Vessel on their account in case of a capture and re-capture, slightly opposed by Defendants Council, and given up without debate.
The Defendant in this case underwrote an open Policy on the Vessel from Philadelphia to Jamaica, she was taken by the Enemy and ret ken, and carried into Jamaica, where by Agreement between the Captain and Re-captors, without going into the Court of Admiralty, she was sold at public Sale for about one fourth of the Sum insured, and brought by the Captain for the former Owners, who afterwards acquiesced in the purchase, and now sued for the whole Sum insured as a total loss. The Sale was proved to be fair, and the Plaintiff’s Council insisted that from the moment of the Capture, there was a tot l loss, and cited divers cases to shew, that if there be a Capture, though it be not such a one as by the Law of Nations would change the Property, yet it would be sufficient to charge Underwriters with a total Loss, and the Assured may abandon.–Beaws Lex Mer. 268. Conyngham 225. 259. 300. 340.
​ On the Part of the Defendant, it was insisted that he ought to pay no more on this Policy then the actual loss sutained by the Payment of Salvage and other Charges. That the Captain having set up the Vessel to sale without any Orders of the Court of Admiralty, and purchased her himself in behalf of the Owners, for about one fourth of the Sum insured, and this being acquiesced in by the Plaintiffs, there was no abandonment, and therefore but an average loss.
The Court gave a charge in Favour of Defendant; and the Jury accordingly gave the Plaintiffs a Verdict for so much only as they judged a compensation for Salvage, charges, and Loss of Time, on account of the capture.
# Socialism and Art

Foreword by Walter Crane
| Socialism and . . . . . Art . . . . | By Jack C. Squire |
| With . . . . . Introduction . By . . . . . . Walter Crane. ||
| XXth Century Press, Ltd., (Trade Union and 48 Hours), 37a & 38, Clerkenwell Green, London, E.C. 10,000/9/27. | ONE PENNY. |
SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC FEDERATION.
Central Office:
21a, Maiden Lane, Charing Cross, London, W.C.
Telephone No.; Central 13877.
The S.D.F. consists of Socialists. The land, the means of producing and distributing wealth are now owned by private persons, who take to themselves the greater part of the wealth created by labour of the workers who sell brain and labour power for wages.
The poverty, degradation, and misery in which millions of our fellow citizens exist is the result of private possession of the means for producing wealth required by all.
The people should own what the people need. That is to say, the land, factories, railways, and all things essential to wealth production, should be owned by the community, and used for the common good. This done, and the socially-produced wealth distributed in accord with the needs of the people, poverty would cease, and equal opportunity bring comfort and culture to all.
This great change in Society demands the organisation of the working-class into a political party having Socialism as its aim. The S.D.F. is that party, and endeavours to spread a knowledge of its principles by every means available.
If you desire to know more about the S.D.F., and if you agree with its principles and desire to join, application may be made to the local branch Secretary or to the Secretary of the S.D.F., H. W. LEE, 21a, Maiden Lane, Charing Cross, London, W.C. A full list of the local Branch Secretaries and their Addresses is published in "Justice."
Foreword Art and Socialism Advertising
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1958, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 65 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Socialism Made Easy

Socialism Made Easy
James Connolly
Socialism Made Easy
In Two Sections
Section I Workshop Talks
Section II Political Action of Labor
By James Connolly (Editor of The Harp)
Chicago Charles H. Kerr & Company 1909
Copyright 1909 By Charles H. Kerr & Company.
80
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Socialism Made Easy/Foreword

Foreword
In this work the author presents his own views in his own manner. Hence he employs the first person singular in preference to the impersonal “we” of journalism or of official production. The articles have been written at various times in Ireland and America and have already attained a wide circulation through being reprinted in various Socialist journals in both countries. Constant requests to the author to have them collected and published in a more permanent and accessible form have induced him to make this selection in the hope that they may be thought not unworthy of a place in at least the fugitive literature of the Socialist movement.
A word as to the plan of the work may not be amiss here. Section 1 is light, satirical, jesting and serious by turns, and follows the usual form of attack and defense, argument and rebuttal, experienced by a Socialist workman in factory, workshop or mine before he has destroyed the prejudices and won the serious consideration of his fellow workers. Section 2 is serious throughout, and is an an attempt to deduce from actual every-day experiences and from historical facts the probable correct answer to the question put by the worker when he realizes the necessity of a change, viz: How must we act? How are we going to do it?
# Socialism Made Easy/Advertisements

Are you interested in the views expressed in this book?
Then Read
The Harp
Journal of the Irish Socialist Federation
edited by James Connolly
The Harp advocates the Industrial and Political Organization of Labor, and makes a specialty of dealing with the Irish Question from the Socialist standpoint, the Socialist position from the Irish standpoint, and all questions from the standpoint of the Working Class.
Unique and unapproachable. A high-class literary magazine.
Monthly, five cents; per annum, fifty cents.
7 to 9 Third Avenue : : : New York City
Out of the Dump A Story by Mary E. Marcy
Price 50 Cents, postpaid Charles H. Kerr & Co. Publishers 153 Kinzie St. Chicago
– OUT OF THE DUMP.
# Socialism and Art/Advertising

"KNOWLEDGE IS POWER."
All Socialists and persons wishing to keep in touch with the views of the Social-Democratic Party on current events, and those desirous of becoming acquainted with the aims and objects of Socialism, should subscribe to the premier Socialist Journal of this country,
"JUSTICE,"
Published Weekly, 1d.To be obtained of all Newsagents.
Amongst others the following well-known public men and writers are frequent contributors to the columns of this fearless champion of the rights of the working-class:—H. M. Hyndman, E. Belfort Bax, R. B. Cunninghame Graham, Countess of Warwick, H. Quelch, J. B. Askew, Herbert Burrows, Walter Crane, Geo. Lansbury, F. Victor Fisher, Fred Knee, Dora H. Montifiore, J. Hunter Watts, J. Sketchley, A. P, Hazell, E. R. Hartley, and H. W. Hobart.
THE SOCIALIST REVIEW.
For academic and classic articles and discussions on Socialism and its ramifications,
Read "The Social-Democrat," 6d. Monthly
The above periodicals or any other literature dealing with Socialism or the Socialist movement can be obtained at the
Twentieth Century Press, Limited
(Trade Union and 48 hours),
37a & 38. Clerkenwell Green, London, E.C.
Catalogues Post Free on application.
| The. . . Twentieth Century. . Press, . . Ltd. . . . 37a and 38, Clerkenwell Green, London, E.C. | The Twentieth Century Press is in the front rank of employers. It pays above the full union rate of wages for a 48-hour week as against the union week of 52½ hours. Whilst specially catering for Trade Unions and other working-class organisations, the Press undertakes all kinds of Commercial and General Printing, which is executed with neatness and dispatch. |
| The. . . Twentieth Century. . Press, . . Ltd. . . . 37a and 38, Clerkenwell Green, London, E.C. | Commercial & General Printers |
| The. . . Twentieth Century. . Press, . . Ltd. . . . 37a and 38, Clerkenwell Green, London, E.C. | Special attention given to Election Work: Posters, Handbills, Cartoons, Election Addresses, Poll Cards, &c., &c. Trade Union Journals, Annual Reports and Balance Sheets, Ledgers, Contribution Cards, Receipt Forms, and Stationery of every description. WRITE OR CALL FOR ESTIMATES. 48 Hours and Trade Union Conditions in all Departments. |
# Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc. (392 U.S. 657)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
392 U.S. 657
Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for further consideration in light of Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409, 88 S.Ct. 2186, 20 L.Ed.2d 1189.
Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Harlan's dissenting opinion in Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409, 449, 88 S.Ct. 2186, 2208, 20 L.Ed.2d 1189.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sullivan v. Portland and Kennebec Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
94 U.S. 806
Sullivan v. Portland and Kennebec Railroad Company
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maine.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Submitted on printed arguments by Mr. A. G. Stinchfield for the appellant, and by Mr. James W. Bradbury for the appellee.
MR. JUSTICE SWAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc. (396 U.S. 229)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 229
Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc.
Argued: Oct. 13, 1969. --- Decided: Dec 15, 1969
[Syllabus from pages 229-230 intentionally omitted]
Allison W. Brown, Jr., Washington, D.C., for petitioners.
John Charles Harris, Alexandria, Va., for respondents.
Opinion of the Court by Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, announced by Mr. Justice BLACK.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc.

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc.."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc. (392 U.S. 657)
* Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc. (396 U.S. 229)
# Taylor v. Savage (43 U.S. 395)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
43 U.S. 395
Taylor v. Savage
THIS case came before the court at the last term, and is reported in 1 How., 282.
It was brought up again on a motion to dismiss the appeal.
Morehead, who made the motion, referred to the decision at the last term, and said that notwithstanding that decision, the case was still here. He considered the opinion of the court as covering the whole ground.
Crittenden, contra.
Both parties appealed from the decision of the court below; but Savage did not perfect his appeal. There is a difficulty in making proper parties, if the case is sent back. The law of Alabama says that administration of the estate shall be attached to the office of sheriff, but his official term will soon expire, and we shall have to litigate with temporary administrators.
Berrien, on the same side, thought there was still a case before the court upon which it could act. It is true that the decree below was rendered on the same day that the administrator was removed; but notwithstanding this, it was well rendered. If a party dies, the court will direct a judgment to be entered as on the first day of the term. 2 Peters, 481.
There is no difference between a party dying and one in a representative character being removed. This must have been the view of the court; the validity of the decree must have been recognized when they said that the voluntary appearance of Benham would cure all defects. The decree could not have been considered null. If the decree was well rendered, the appeal was well taken, because it was taken at the same term whilst the proceedings were within the power of the court. The appeal was prayed and allowed in open court. This court can now proceed either,
1. By Benham's voluntary appearance, or
2. By issuing process to bring him in.
1. This was decided at the last term.
2. Benham's will cannot give the court jurisdiction. The 28th rule provides for the death of a party and summoning another to take his place. The same power that adopted this rule can modify it and say that the successor to an executor can be summoned. The power to establish a general rule involves the power to make a special one to suit a particular case; general rules are made only to prevent specific orders.
Sergeant, in reply and conclusion, argued at some length that the decision at the last term covered the case as it now stood. The party on the other side must go into the court below and have the record put into a correct form.
Mr. Justice STORY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Taylor v. Savage

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Taylor v. Savage."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Taylor v. Savage (42 U.S. 282)
* Taylor v. Savage (43 U.S. 395)