OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Blythsome bridal/The Blythsome Bridal

FY let us a’ to the Bridal, For there will be lilting there, For Jock’s to be marry’d to Maggy, The lass wi’ the gouden hair. And there will be lang kail and pottage. And bannocks o’ barley meal: And there will be good sa’t herrings. To relish a cog o’ good ale.
Fy let us a’ to the Bridal, &c.
And there will be Sandy the souter, And Will wi’ the meikle mou’ And there will be Tam the butler, With Andrew the Tinker I trow, ​And there will be bow’d legged Robbie, With thumbless Katty’s goodman: ⟨And⟩ there will be blue cheeked Dowbie, And Lourie the laird of the land.
And there will be sow libber Patie. Plucky fac’d Wat i' the mill, apper-nos’d Patie and Gibbie, That wins in the how o’ the hill ; And there will be Alaster Sibbie, Wha in wi’ black Bessy did mooll, With snivelling Lilly and Tibby, The lass that stands aft on the stool.
And Madge that was buckled Steenie And coft him grey breeks to his arse Wha after was hangit for stealing Great mercy it happen’d na warse; And there will be gleed Geordy Janners, And Kirst wi' the lily white leg, Wha gade to the south for manners, And bang'd up her wame in Mona Meg.
​And there will be Judan Maclawrie, And blinking daft Barbra Macleg, Wi’ flae lugged sharney fac’d Lawrie, And shangy mou’d haluket Meg, And there will be happer ars’d Nancy, And fairie fac’d Flowrie by name, With Madie, and fat hippet Girsy, The lass wi’ the gouden wame.
And there will be girn again Gibbie, Wi’ his glaiket wife Jenny Bell, And misle shin’d Mango Macapie, The lad that was skipper himsel. There lads and lasses in pearling. Will feast in the heart of the ha’, On sybows, and rifarts and carlings, That are baith sodden and raw,
And there will be sadings brochan, Wi' fouth o’ gude gabbocks o’ skate. Powsoddy, and drummock, and crowdy And caller nowt feet in a plate. And there will be partans aad buckies, And whytens and speldens enew, ​With sing’d sheep-heads and a haggies, And scadlips to sup till ye spew.
And there will be lapper’d milk kebbucks, And sowens, and farls, and baps, With swats and scraped paunches, And brandy in stoups and in caps, And there will be meal kail and custocks, With skink to sup till we rive, And roasts to roast on a brander, Of fleuks that were taken alive.
Scrapt haddocks, wilks, dulse, and tangle, And a mill of good snishing to prie ; When weary with eatinT and drinking, We’ll rise up and dance till we die. Then fy let us a’ to the bridal, For there will be lilting there, For Jock’s to be married to Maggy, The lass wi’ the gouden hair.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Blücher's letter to Davoust, 1 July 1815

* related portals: Hundred Days.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
A reply to Davous's letter to Wellington and Blücher, 30 June 1815
Prince Blücher, who entertained a great contempt for diplomacy, attributing as he did the cause of the renewal of the war to the ill concocted schemes to which that war had given birth, had hitherto refrained from either receiving in person, or noticing in writing, any communication addressed to him by the French authorities. He applied himself solely to the military solution to the defeat of Napoleon and the restoration of the Louis VIII.
Upon this occasion, however, tempted probably by the opportunity which was offered to him of sharply retorting upon the Marshal, under whose government of Hamburg the greatest excesses had been committed upon his countrymen; he was induced to reply, in his native German, as if to evince both his disdain of the usual diplomatic mode of communication (French being the lingua franca of the day), and his dislike of even the very language of the country he so thoroughly detested.
To the French General Davoust,
Headquarters, July 1, 1816.
Marshal,
It is not conformable to truth that, because Napoleon has abdicated the throne, there exists no further motive for War between the Allied Powers and France. His abdication is conditional; that is, in favour of his son: but a Decree of the Allied Powers excludes not only Napoleon, but every member of his Family, from the Throne.
If General Frimont has considered himself authorised to conclude an Armistice with your General opposed to him, that is no motive for us to do the same. We shall pursue our victory. God has given us strength and resolution to do so. Beware, Marshal, of what you do; and forbear devoting another city to destruction! for you know what liberties the exasperated soldiers would take, should your capital be carried by storm. Do you solicit the maledictions of Paris, in addition to those of Hamburg?
We shall enter Paris to protect the respectable inhabitants against the mob, by whom they are threatened with pillage. An Armistice can be made with security nowhere but in Paris. This, our relative position towards your Nation, be pleased. Marshal, not to mistake!
Let me finally observe to you, Marshal, if you mean to negotiate with us, it is matter of surprise that, in defiance of the Law of Nations, you detain our Officers dispatched with Letters and Orders.
In the usual form of conventional civility, I have the honour to be,
    Marshal,
    Your obedient servant,
    Blücher.
# Beowulf (Wyatt)/Beowulf 37

XXXVII.
Ðā ic æt þearfe [gefrægn] þeod-cyninges 2695andlongne eorl ellen cȳðan, cræft ond cēnðu, swā him gecynde wæs; ne hēdde hē þæs heafolan (ac sīo hand gebarn mōdiges mannes, þǣr hē his mǣges healp), ​þæt hē þone nīð-gæst nioðor hwēne slōh, 2700secg on searwum, þæt ðæt sweord gedēaf fāh ond fǣted, þæt ðæt fȳr ongon sweðrian syððan. Þā gēn sylf cyning gewēold his gewitte, wæll-seaxe gebrǣd biter ond beadu-scearp, þæt hē on byrnan wæg; 2705forwrāt Wedra *helm wyrm on middan.Fol. 189a. Fēond gefyldan, ferh ellen wræc, ond hī hyne þā bēgen ābroten hæfdon, sib-æðelingas; swylc sceolde secg wesan, þegn æt ðearfe. Þæt ðām þēodne wæs 2710sīðas[t] sige-hwīle sylfes dǣdum, worlde geweorces.̌ Ðā sīo wund ongon, þe him se eorð-draca ǣr geworhte, swēlan ond swellan; hē þæt sōna onfand, þæt him on brēostum bealo-nīð wēoll, 2715āttor on innan. Ðā se æðeling gīong, þæt hē bī wealle wīs-hycgende gesæt on sesse, seah on enta geweorc, hū ðā stān-bogan stapulum fæste ēce eorð-reced innan healde. 2720Hyne þā mid handa heoro-drēorigne, þēoden mǣrne, þegn ungemete till, wine-dryhten his, wætere gelafede hilde-sædne, ond his hel[m] onspēon. Bīowulf maþelode: hē ofer benne spræc, 2725wunde wæl-blēate; wisse hē gearwe, ​þæt hē dæg-hwīla gedrogen hæfde eorðan wynn[e]; ðā wæs eall sceacen dōgor-gerīmes, dēatð ungemete nēah: “Nū ic suna mīnum syllan wolde 2730gūð-gewǣdu, þǣr mē gifeðe swā ǣnig yrfe-*weard æfter wurdeFol. 189b. līce gelenge. Ic ðās lēode hēold fīftig wintra; næs se folc-cyning ymbe-sittendra ǣnig ðāra, 2735þe mec gūð-winum grētan dorste, egesan ðēon. Ic on earde bād mǣl-gesceafta, hēold mīn tela, ne sōhte searo-nīðas, ne mē swōr fela āða on unriht. Ic ðæs ealles mæg 2740feorh-bennum sēoc gefēan habban; forðam mē wītan ne ðearf Waldend fīra morðor-bealo māga, þonne mīn sceaceð līf of līce. Nū ðū lungre geong hord scēawian under hārne stān, 2745Wīglāf lēofa, nū se wyrm ligeð, swefeð sāre wund, since berēafod. Bīo nū on ofoste, þæt ic ǣr-welan, gold-ǣht ongite, gearo scēawige swegle searo-gimmas, þæt ic ðȳ sēft mæge 2750æfter māððum-welan mīn ālǣtan līf ond lēod-scipe, þone ic longe hēold.”
* ↑ 2694. No gap in MS. Kemble’s emendation. See ll. 2484, 2752, etc.
* ↑ 2698. MS. ‘mægenes’ (so Wülcker); cf. l. 2628 and foot-note. See also l. 2879.
* ↑ 2710. Grundtvig’s emendation. Kemble ‘sīðes sige-hwīl’; Grein ‘sīðast sige-hwīla.’
* ↑ 2719. Heyne ‘hēoldon.’ For the tense of. ll. 1923, 1928, 2486; and for the sing. verb with pl. subject in a subordinate clause cf. l. 2164, and see the note on l. 2035.
* ↑ 2723. MS. defective at edge, here and in l. 2727.
# Bound to Succeed

Volume Three in the Boys of Business series
BOUND TO
SUCCEED
Or
Mail Order Frank's Chances
BY
ALLEN CHAPMAN
AUTHOR OF "THE HEROES OF THE SCHOOL," "NED WILDING'S DISAPPEARANCE," "FRANK ROSCOE'S SECRET," "FENN MASTERTON'S DISCOVERY," "BART KEENE'S HUNTING DAYS," ETC., ETC.
The
GOLDSMITH
Publishing Co.
CLEVELANDOHIO
MADE IN U.S.A.
Copyright, 1907, by Cupples & Leon Company
CONTENTS
| CHAPTER | CHAPTER | PAGE |
| I. | Waking Up | 1 |
| II. | A Five-Dollar Job | 11 |
| III. | A Business Call | 19 |
| IV. | A Break for Liberty | 28 |
| V. | The Balloonist's Rescue | 37 |
| VI. | "Mail Order Frank" | 51 |
| VII. | Strictly Business | 57 |
| VIII. | A Step Forward | 67 |
| IX. | Sense and System | 76 |
| X. | A Visit to the City | 87 |
| XI. | A Friend in Need | 99 |
| XII. | A Boy with a Mystery | 109 |
| XIII. | A Good Start | 117 |
| XIV. | A Mean Enemy | 126 |
| XV. | A Piece of Chalk | 133 |
| XVI. | "Frank's Mail Order House" | 143 |
| XVII. | A Nest Egg | 153 |
| XVIII. | A Suspicious Visitor | 162 |
| XIX. | Missing | 169 |
| XX. | A Bad Business | 176 |
| XXI. | An Unexpected Meeting | 185 ​ |
| XXII. | Good News | 194 |
| XXIII. | A Rival Concern | 200 |
| XXIV. | An Unwelcome Visitor | 206 |
| XXV. | Trouble Brewing | 213 |
| XXVI. | Mysterious Stet | 219 |
| XXVII. | The Post-Office Inspector | 225 |
| XXVIII. | A Heart of Gold | 232 |
| XXIX. | Conclusion | 237 |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bullock v. South Carolina/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
365 U.S. 292
Bullock v. South Carolina
After hearing oral argument and fully examining the record which was only partially set forth in the petition for certiorari, we conclude that the totality of circumstances as the record makes them manifest did not warrant bringing the case here. Accordingly, the writ is dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bullocky Bill and His Old Red Team

From a river siding, the railway town, Or the dull new port there three days down, Forward and back on the up-hill track, With a creak of the jinker, a ringing crack, Slow as a funeral, sure as steam, Bullocky Bill and his old red team.
Ploughing around by the ti-tree scrub, Four wheels down to the creeping hub, Swaying they go, with their heads all low, Bally, and Splodger, and Spot, and Jo. Men in the ranges much esteem Bullocky Bill and his old red team.
Worming about where the tall trees spring, Surging ahead when the clay bogs cling; A rattle of lash and of language rash On the narrow edge of immortal smash. He'd thread a bead or walk a beam, Bullocky Bill with his old red team.
Climbing a ridge where the red stars ride; Straddling down on the other side, With a whistle and grind, and a scramble blind, And a thundering gum-tree slung behind. But they always get there, hill or stream, Bullocky Bill and his old red team.
Engines or stamps for the mines about, Tools for the men who are leading out; Tucker, and boose, and the latest news Back where the bunyip stirs the ooze. Pioneers with the best we deem Bullocky Bill and his old red team.
This work is in the public domain in Australia because it was created in Australia and the term of copyright has expired. According to Australian Copyright Council - Duration of Copyright, the following works are public domain:
* published non-government works whose author died before January 1, 1955,
* anonymous or pseudonymous works and photographs published before January 1, 1955, and
* government works published more than 50 years ago (before January 1, 1974).
This work is also in the public domain in the United States because it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days), and it was first published before 1989 without complying with U.S. copyright formalities (renewal and/or copyright notice) and it was in the public domain in Australia on the URAA date (January 1, 1996). This is the combined effect of Australia having joined the Berne Convention in 1928, and of 17 USC 104A with its critical date of January 1, 1996.
Because the Australian copyright term in 1996 was 50 years, the critical date for copyright in the United States under the URAA is January 1, 1946.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1931, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 92 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bumper v. North Carolina

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Harlan

## Dissenting Opinions

    Black
    White
United States Supreme Court
391 U.S. 543
Bumper v. North Carolina
Certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina
No. 1016. Argued: April 24-25, 1968 --- Decided: June 3, 1968
Petitioner was tried for rape in North Carolina, an offense punishable by death unless the jury recommends life imprisonment. The prosecution was permitted to challenge for cause all prospective jurors who stated that they were opposed to capital punishment or had conscientious scruples against imposing the death penalty. A rifle which was introduced at the trial was obtained by a search of petitioner's grandmother's house, where he resided. Four officers appeared at the home, announced that they had a warrant to search it, and were told by the owner to "[g]o ahead." At the hearing on a motion to suppress, which was denied, the prosecutor stated that he did not rely on a warrant to justify the search, but on consent. The jury found petitioner guilty, but recommended life imprisonment, and the State Supreme Court affirmed.
Held:
    1. Petitioner has adduced no evidence to support his claim that a jury from which those who are opposed to capital punishment or have conscientious scruples against imposing the death penalty are excluded for cause is necessarily "prosecution prone," warranting reversal of his conviction for denial of his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to an impartial jury. Witherspoon v. Illinois, ante, p. 510. P. 545.
    2. A search cannot be justified as lawful on the basis of consent when that "consent" has been given only after the official conducting the search has asserted that he possesses a warrant; there is no consent under such circumstances. Pp. 546-550.
    3. Because the rifle, which was erroneously admitted into evidence, was plainly damaging against petitioner, its admission was not harmless error. Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18. P. 550.
270 N.C. 521, 155 S.E. 2d 173, reversed and remanded.
Norman B. Smith argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner, pro hac vice.
Harry W. McGalliard, Deputy Attorney General of North Carolina, argued the cause for respondent, With him on the brief was T.W. Bruton, Attorney General.
Briefs of amici curiae were filed by Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Michael Meltsner, Leroy D. Clark, Norman C. Amaker, and Charles S. Ralston for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., et al., and by F. Lee Bailey, pro se.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bulova Watch Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
365 U.S. 753
Bulova Watch Company v. United States
Argued: March 27, 1961. --- Decided: April 17, 1961
Mr. Bernard Weiss, New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Oscar H. Davis, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice WHITTAKER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bumper v. North Carolina/Dissent White

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Harlan
* Dissenting Opinions Black White
United States Supreme Court
391 U.S. 543
Bumper v. North Carolina
Argued: April 24 and 25, 1968. --- Decided: June 3, 1968
Mr. Justice WHITE, dissenting.
When 'consent' to a search is given after the occupant has been told by police officers that they have a warrant for the search, it seems reasonable to me for Fourth Amendment purposes to view the consent as conditioned on there being a valid warrant, absent clear proof that the consent was actually unconditional. The evidence in this record does not show unconditional consent with sufficient clarity, and perhaps this would be the result in most cases. But this does not mean that every search following conditional consent is invalid. If upon a motion to suppress or upon an objection to evidence offered at the trial, the State produces a valid warrant for the search, there is no good reason to exclude the evidence simply because police at the time of the search relied on the consent and neither served nor returned the warrant. In the case before us the State represented in this Court that there was a warrant for the challenged search. Unlike the Court and Mr. Justice HARLAN, I would not brush this matter aside. Since the existence and validity of the warrant have not been determined in the state courts, the case is not ripe for reversal or affirmance. I would therefore not reverse, but vacate, this conviction, returning the case to the state courts for a determination of the validity of the warrant. If because of the absence of probable cause, or for some other reason, the warrant would not have been a proper predicate for the search, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), would require reversal of the conviction unless it is saved under the harmless-error rule of Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967).

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bullock v. South Carolina

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
365 U.S. 292
Bullock v. South Carolina
Mr. Matthew J. Perry, Spartanburg, S.C.., for petitioner.
Mr. Robert L. Kilgo, Darlington, S.C.., for respondent.
On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Battle of Philiphaugh

THE
BATTLE OF
PHILIPHAUGH;
TOGETHER WITH THE
BATTLE OF LOUDON-HILL,
AND
AUCHINDOWN.
GLASGOW:
PRINTED FOR THE BOOKSELLERS.
80.
* The Battle of Philiphaugh
* The Battle of Loudon-Hill
* Auchindown
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Battle of Chippawa, New York Pension Roll

Pension Grante[e] New-York Roll.
By command of Brig$^r$. Gen$^l$. Henry Burbeck.
TO ALL WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
KNOW YE, That John Conley, Private of captain D. Ketchum's company in the twenty fifth regiment of U. States Infantry who was enlisted the twenty first day of March eighteen hundred and fourteen for the period of During the War is hereby honorably discharged from the army of the United States, on the surgeon's certificate, as being disqualified to perform the duties of a soldier by reason of a Wound by the bursting of a Bomb which fractured the bones in his left Foot in the battle with the Enemy at Chippewa.
Said John Conley was born in the Town of Norwalk in the State of Connecticut is about Eighteen years of age, five feet six & ½ inches high, light complexion, black eyes, brown hair and by occupation, when enlisted, a Cordwainer.
Given at Greenbush cantonment, this Twenty Sixth day of February 1815.
[Signatures]
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Battle of Philiphaugh/The Battle of Loudon-Hill

THE BATTLE OF LOUDON-HILL.
You'l marvel when I tell ye o’ Our noble Burly, and his train; When last he march’d up thro’ the land, Wi’ sax-and-twenty westland men.
Than they I ne’er o’ braver heard, For they had a’ baith wit and skill; They proved right well, as I heard tell, As they cam’ up o’er Loudon-hill.
Weel prosper a’ the gospel lads, That are into the west countrie; Ay wicked Claver’se to demean, And ay an ill dead may he die!
For he’s drawn up i’battle rank. An’ that baith soon and hastilie; But they wha live till simmer come,
​But up spak’ cruel Claver’se then, Wi’ hastie wit, an’ wicked skill; “Gi’e fire on yon westlan’ men; I think it is my sov’reign’s will."
But up bespake his cornet, then, “It’s be wi’ nae consent o’ me! I ken I’ll ne’er come back again, An’ mony mae as weel as me.
“There is not ane of a’ yon men, But wha is worthy other three; There is na ane amang them a’, That in his cause will stap to die.
“An’ as for Burly, him I knaw; He’s a man of honour, birth, an’ fame; Gi’e him a sword into his hand, He’ll fight thysel’ an’ other ten."
But up spake wicked Claver’se then, I wat his heart it raise fu’ hie! And he has cry’d that a’ might hear, “ Man, ye ha’e sair deceived me.
“I never ken’d the like afore, Na, never since I came frae hame, That you sae cowardly here suld prove, An’ yet come of a noble Graeme.”
But up bespake his cornet, then, “Since that it is your honour’s will, Mysel’ shall be the foremost man,
​“At your command I’ll lead them on, But yet wi’ nae consent o’ me; For weel I ken I’ll ne’er return, And mony mae as weel as me.”
Then up he drew in battle rank; I wat he had a bonnie train! But the first time that bullets flew, Ay he lost twenty o’ his men.
Then back he came the way he gaed, I wat right soon and suddenly! He gave command amang his men, And sent them back, and bade them flee.
Then up came Burly, bauld an’ stout, Wi’s little train o’ Westland men; Wha mair than either aince or twice In Edinburgh confined had been.
They ha’e been up to London sent, An’ yet they’re a’ come safely down; Sax troop o’ horsemen they ha’e beat, And chased them into Glasgow town.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Battle of Prestonpans Speech

* related portals: Speeches, Scotland.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
The speech given by Sir John Cope, commander of the Hanoverian government forces at the Battle of Prestonpans, Scotland, just before his defeat in that battle. Given during the Jacobite Rebellion on 21 September 1745.
Gentlemen, You are just now to Engage with a parcel of Rable; a Parcel of Brutes, Being a small number of Scots Highlands, You can expect no Booty from such a poor despicable Pack. I have Authority to Declare, That you shall have Eight Full Hour's liberty to Plunder and Pillage the City of Edinburgh, Leith, and Suburbs, - the Place's which harbour'd and succour'd Them - at your Discretion, with Impunity.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse