OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# The Indian Biographical Dictionary (1915)/Mysore, Maharaja of, Krishna Raja Wadiyar IV

Find main topic
Layout 2
​Mysore, Maharaja of; H.H. Maharaja Sir Krishna Raja Woodiar Bahadur, G.C.S.I., (1907); e.s. of late Maharaja Sir Chamaraja Woodiar Bahadur, G.C.S.I.; b.Mysore, 1884; ​succeeded to gaddi as a minor, 1895; claims descent from the race of Yadavas; the administration of the State during the minority of His Highness, was conducted by a Council of Regency composed of Her Highness the Maharani Vani Vilasa Sannidhana, C.I. (mother of the Maharaja) with the help of a Diwan and three Councillors; educ: first, under the guidance of Mr. P. Raghavender Rao, B.A., B.L., and afterwards under the guidance of Mr. Stuart Milford Fraser, C.I.E., I.C.S.; m. Pratap Kumari Bai, d. of the Rana Sahib of Vana, Kathiawar, 1900; assumed direct control of the State, 1901; opened the ' Industrial and Arts Exhibition, Madras,' 1903; invited to the Delhi Durbar 1903; entertained in his capital Their Royal Highnesses the Prince and the Princess of Wales (the present Emperor and Empress), 1906; visited the Indian Industrial Exhibition, Calcutta, the same year; sanctioned the formation of a Legislative Council in his State, which has been doing satisfactory work; placed all the resources of his State, even including his personal services, at the disposal of the Government of India, owing to the present European War; maintains a Military force of about 2,722, composed of 2 regiments of Silladar Cavalry and 3 Battalions of Barr Infantry; one of the Cavalry regiments is the well known ‘Mysore Imperial Service Lancers’, with which is kept up an Imperial Transport Corps; entitled to a salute of 21 guns; area of the State, 29,433 square miles; population, nearly six millions; revenue, nearly 2½ crores; military expenditure of the State, nearly 9½ lakhs. Recreations: Hunting, Driving, Motoring, Polo, Racquets and Music. Address: ‘The Palace’, Mysore; ‘Fern Hill’, Ootacamund, Madras Presidency, India.
# The Indian Biographical Dictionary (1915)/Murza, Muhammad Ali Beg Khan

Find main topic
Layout 2
​Murza, Muhammad Ali Beg Khan, Nawab Bahadur; s. of Mirza Wilayut Ali Beg; Risaldar, 3rd Lancers, Hyderabad Contingent; Afghan War, 1879-80; Black Mountain Expedition, 1900; raised and commanded the 1st and 2nd Lancers, Hyderabad Imperial Service Troops; ​Commandant of H.H. the Nizam’s Regular Forces, since 1897. Address: Hyderabad (D), India.
# The Indian Biographical Dictionary (1915)/Muttannah, Mr. P.

Find main topic
Layout 2
​Muttannah, Mr. P., Rao Bahadur, (1839); Conservator of Forests (retired), Mysore State; b. 1855; educ: Mercara, Coorg; and Bangalore; joined service in the Forest Department as Probationer, Coorg, 1878; served in the Central Provinces, 1886-98; transferred to Madras Service and posted as Extra Deputy Conservator, 1899; services lent to Mysore where he rose to the position of Conservator of Forests, and Secretary to Mysore Government (Forest Branch), 1901; retired, 1914. Address: Mercara, Coorg, India.
# The Indian Biographical Dictionary (1915)/Muttunayagam Pillai, Michael A.

Find main topic
Layout 2
​Muttunayagam Pillai, Michael A., B.A., B.L., Judge, High Court, Travancore, since 1913; passed B.A., 1882; B.L., 1885. Address: Trivandrum, Travancore State, S. India.
# The Indian Biographical Dictionary (1915)/Mysore, Dowager Maharani of; H.H. Maharani Vani Vilasa Sannidhana

Find main topic
Layout 2
​Mysore, Dowager Maharani of; H.H. Maharani Vani Vilasa Sannidhana, C.I. mother of the present Maharaja; conducted the administration of the State with the help of a Diwan and a Council of three Members during the minority of the Maharaja; is greatly loved and esteemed by all her subjects. Address: The ‘Palace’, Mysore, India.
# COVID-19 Vaccination Record Card

* related portals: Coronavirus disease 2019.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
Please note that this transcription of the card may not be legally valid as a substitute for an official copy.
​ COVID-19 Vaccination Record Card
Please keep this record card, which includes medical information about the vaccines you have received.
Por favor, guarde esta tarjeta de registro, que incluye información médica sobre las vacunas que ha recibido.
| Last Name | Last Name | First Name | MI |
| Date of birth | Date of birth | Patient number (medical record or IIS record number) | Patient number (medical record or IIS record number) |
| Vaccine | Product name/Manufacturer | Date | Healthcare Professional or Clinic Site |
| Vaccine | Lot number | Date | Healthcare Professional or Clinic Site |
| 1st Dose COVID-19 | | ____/____/____ ____mm ____dd ____yy | |
| 2nd Dose COVID-19 | | ____/____/____ ____mm ____dd ____yy | |
| Other | | ____/____/____ ____mm ____dd ____yy | |
| Other | | ____/____/____ ____mm ____dd ____yy | |
Reminder! Return for a second dose!
¡Recordatorio! ¡Regrese para la segunda dosis!
For more information about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccine, visit cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/index.html.
Lleve este registro de vacunación a cada cita médica o de vacunación. Consulte con su proveedor de atención médica para asegurarse de que no le falte ninguna dosis de las vacunas recomendadas.
Para obtener más información sobre el COVID-19 y la vacuna contra el COVID-19, visite espanol.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/index.html.
Puede notificar las posibles reacciones adversas después de la vacunación contra el COVID-19 al Sistema de Notificación de Reacciones Adversas a las Vacunas (VAERS) en vaers.hhs.gov.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# CSRT Record of Proceedings ICO ISN 590

From page 9 of http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_arb/publicly_filed_CSRT_records_3190-3290.pdf
HEADQUARTERS, OARDEC FORWARD
GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA
APOA E0 9360
| | 11 October 2004 |
| MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, CSRT |
| FROM:OARDEC FORWARD Commander SUBJECT:CSRT Record of Proceedings ICO ISN # |
* Pursuant to Enclosure (1), paragraph/0(5) of "Implementation of Combatant Status Review Tribunal Procedures for Enemy Combatants detained at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba" dated 29 July 2004, I am forwarding the Combatant Status Review Tribunal Decision Report for. the above mentioned ISN for review and action.
* If there are any questions regarding this package, point of contact on this matter is the undersigned at DSN
* DAVID L. TAYLOR
* Colonel, USAF
# CSRT Summary of Evidence memo for Abbas Habid Rumi Al Naely

Wikified from page 65 of http://www.dod.mil/pubs/foi/detainees/csrt_mar05.pdf, on April 20, 2007.
758 UNCLASSIFIED COMBATANT STATUS REVIEW BOARD
| To: | Personal Representative |
| From: | OIC, CSRT (25 October 2004) |
| Subject: | Summary of Evidence for Combatant Status Review Tribunal [ (b)(6) ] |
| 1. | Under the provisions of the Secretary of the Navy Memorandum, dated 29 July 2004, Implementation of Combatant Status Review Tribunal Procedures for Enemy Combatants Detained at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base Cuba, a Tribunal has been appointed to review the detainee's designation as an enemy combatant. |
| 2. | An enemy combatant has been defined as "an individual who was part of or supporting the Taliban or al Qaida forces, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. This included any person who committed a belligerent act or has directly supported hostilities in aid of enemy armed forces." |
| 3. | The United States Government has previously determined that the detainee is an enemy combatant. This determination is based on information possessed by the United States that indicates that he is associated with al Qaida and the Taliban. |
| | a. The detainee is associated with al Qaida and the Taliban: 1. From 1987 to 1989, the detainee served as an infantryman in the Iraqi Army, and received training on the mortar and rocket propelled grenades. 2. A Taliban recruiter in Baghdad convinced the detainee to travel to Afghanistan to join the Taliban in 1994. 3. The detainee admitted he was a member of the Taliban. 4. The detainee pledged allegiance to the supreme leader of the Taliban to help them take over all of Afghanistan. 5. The Taliban issued the detainee a Kalishnikov rifle in November 2000. 6. The detainee worked in a Taliban ammo and arms storage arsenal in Mazar-Es-Sharif organizing weapons and ammunition. 7. The detainee willingly associated with al Qaida members. 8. The detainee was a member of al Qaida. 9. An assistant to Usama Bin Ladin paid the detainee on three separate occasions between 1995 and 1997. 10. The detainee stayed at the Al Farouq camp in Darwanta, Afghanistan, where he received 1,000 Rupees to continue his travels. 11. From 1997 to 1998, the detainee acted as a trusted agent for Usama Bin Ladin , executing three separate reconnaissance missions for the al Qaida leader in Oman, Iraq, and Afghanistan. 12. In August 1998, the detainee traveled to Pakistan with a member of Iraqi Intelligence for the purpose of blowing up the Pakistan , United States and British embassies with chemical mortars. 13. Detainee was arrested by Pakistani authorities in Khudzar, Pakistan in July 2002. |
| 4. | The detainee has the opportunity to contest his designation as an enemy combatant. The Tribunal will endeavor to arrange for the presence of any reasonably available witnesses or evidence that the detainee desires to call or introduce to prove that he is not an enemy combatant. The Tribunal President will determine the reasonable availability of availability of evidence or witnesses. |
263 UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-1
# California v. Central Pacific Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
127 U.S. 1
California v. Central Pacific Railroad Company
SAME
v.
SOUTHERN PAC. R. CO.
No. 661.
SAME
v.
NORTHERN RY. CO.
No. 662.
SAME
v.
CALIFORNIA PAC. R. CO.
No. 663.
SAME
v.
CENTRAL PAC. R. CO.
No. 664.
SAME
v.
SAME.
No. 1,157.
April 30, 1888.
[Statement of Case from pages 2-12 intentionally omitted]
Mr. J. M. Wilson for plaintiffs in error.
[Argument of Counsel on pages 12-26 intentionally omitted]
Geo. A. Johnson, Atty. Gen., Saml, Shellabarger, and J. M. Wilson, for the State of California.
Creed Haymond, H. S. Brown, Geo. F. Edmunds, and Wm. M. Evarts, for the railroads.
BRADLEY, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# California v. Deseret Water Oil & Irrigation Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
243 U.S. 415
California v. Deseret Water Oil & Irrigation Company
Argued: January 29, 1917. --- Decided: March 26, 1917
Mr. John T. Nourse and Mr. U.S. Webb, Attorney General of California, for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Charles F. Consaul and A. H. Rickets for defendant in error.
Messrs. Charles D. Mahaffie, C. Edward Wright, and Oscar W. Lange as amici curiae.
Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Blankenship v. Holding

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
387 U.S. 95
Blankenship v. Holding
Charles Nesbitt, Atty. Gen. of Oklahoma, and Jeff Hartmann, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellants.
Samuel W. Block, Thomas P. Sullivan and Paul C. Duncan, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Blankenship v. Holding/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
387 U.S. 95
Blankenship v. Holding
Probable jurisdiction noted. The judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma entered November 4, 1966, is affirmed insofar as it adjudged provisions of §§ 1040.1 to 1040.10 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes to be unconstitutional.
Affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Blanchi v. Morales

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
262 U.S. 170
Blanchi v. Morales
Submitted on Motion to Affirm April 16, 1923.
Decided May 7, 1923.
Mr. Phelan Beale, of New York City, for appellant.
Mr. Carroll G. Walter, of New York City, for appellee.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Blanco v. Hubbard

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
220 U.S. 233
Blanco v. Hubbard
Argued: and submitted March 17, 1911. --- Decided: April 3, 1911
Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney, John Spalding Flannery, William Hitz, and Thomas D. Mott, Jr., for appellant.
Messrs. N. B. K. Pettingill and F. L. Cornwell for appellees.
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Blanchi v. Morales/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
262 U.S. 170
Blanchi v. Morales
This is a bill in equity filed in the District Court to restrain proceedings under the mortgage law of Porto Rico to foreclose a mortgage. That law gives a summary suit in which, speaking broadly, no defence is open except payment, Mortgage Law Regulations, Art. 175; and it is contended that this deprives the plaintiffs, appellants,) of their property without due process of law. The statutes give a separate action to annul the mortgage in which any defense to it may be set up, and also provided for a cautionary notice, Mortgage Law, Art. 42; Mortgage Law Regulations, Art. 91, which the Supreme Court of Porto Rico regards as a sufficient substitute for an injunction. American Trading Co. v. Monserrat, 18 Porto Rico, 268. See Romeu v. Todd, 206 U.S. 358, 27 Sup. Ct. 724, 51 L. Ed. 1093. The bill was dismissed by the District Court for want of jurisdiction. The appellees move that the decree be affirmed.
The facts stated and admitted in the motion papers make it so plain that the bill cannot be maintained that we shall affirm the decree below without putting the parties to the expense of printing the full record. Apart from other matters urged by the appellees the constitutional objection is simply another form of the objection to the separation between possessory and petitory suits familiar to countries that inherit Roman law and not wholly unfamiliar in our own. The United States, the States, and equally Porto Rico, may exclude all claims of ultimate right from possessory actions, consistently with due process of law. Grant Timber & Manufacturing Co. v. Gray, 236 U.S. 133, 35 Sup. Ct. 279, 59 L. Ed. 501; Central Union Trust Co. v. Garvan, 254 U.S. 554, 41 Sup. Ct. 214, 65 L. Ed. 403. Before these decisions it had been strongly intimated by Chief Justice White that the foreclosure by summary process allowed by the law of Porto Rico was valid, Torres v. Lothrop, 231 U.S. 171, 177, 34 Sup. Ct. 108, 58 L. Ed. 172, and a decision to the same effect was rendered by the Supreme Court of the Island. Gimenez v. Brenes, 10 Porto Rico, 124. In view of these decisions we are of opinion that the constitutional question raised was only colorable and that the decree dismissing the bill was right.
Decree affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Blanco v. Hubbard/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
220 U.S. 233
Blanco v. Hubbard
Argued: and submitted March 17, 1911. --- Decided: April 3, 1911
This record involves the bill filed by Perfecto Blanco in the lower court to enjoin the sale of the property under execution in the case of Fernandez and Perez. It concerns, therefore, the proceedings in the equity cause and the right to reopen the decree entered in the same, which we have just disposed of. As stated in that case, the application for injunction pendente lite in this case was considered by the court along with the request to be allowed to appear and defend in the equity cause, made by Perez and Ochoa. When the court temporarily stayed the execution of the judgment, a suggestion was made to counsel by the court that in this case a demurrer be filed to the bill pending the delay which must transpire in considering the subject of the right to enjoin along with, or in connection p*416 with, the right of Perez and Ochoa to appear and defend. When it was concluded that the two latter persons had no such right, and the right to an injunction pendente lite in this case was refused, the reason which controlled the court in refusing to reopen and allow a defense in the equity cause were filed as its reasons for sustaining the demurrer and finally dismissing the bill in this case. As those reasons, however, did not at all concern themselves with the grounds of demurrer separately stated, but solely related to the right to stay, by the process of injunction, the execution of the unsatisfied judgment and the enforcement of the equity decree, we think it plainly results that the decree ren dered in this case must be reversed, because the two dases in the mind of the court were so inseparably united that the error which led the court below to refuse in the other case the right to reopen the cause controlled its action in this.
The decree is therefore reversed and the cause remanded for furthur proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# The Golden Threshold/Folk Songs/Wandering Singers

WANDERING SINGERS
(Written to one of their Tunes)
Where the voice of the wind calls our wandering feet, Through echoing forest and echoing street, With lutes in our hands ever-singing we roam, All men are our kindred, the world is our home.
Our lays are of cities whose lustre is shed, The laughter and beauty of women long dead; The sword of old battles, the crown of old kings, And happy and simple and sorrowful things.
​What hope shall we gather, what dreams shall we sow? Where the wind calls our wandering footsteps we go. No love bids us tarry, no joy bids us wait: The voice of the wind is the voice of our fate.
# The Golden Threshold/Poems/Damayante to Nala in the Hour of Exile

DAMAYANTE TO NALA IN THE HOUR OF EXILE
(A fragment)
Shalt thou be conquered of a human fate, My liege, my lover, whose imperial head Hath never bent in sorrow of defeat? Shalt thou be vanquished, whose imperial feet Have shattered armies and stamped empires dead? Who shall unking thee, husband of a queen? Wear thou thy majesty inviolate. Earth's glories flee of human eyes unseen, Earth's kingdoms fade to a remembered dream, But thine henceforth shall be a power supreme, ​Dazzling command and rich dominion, The winds thy heralds and thy vassals all The silver-belted planets and the sun. Where'er the radiance of thy coming fall, Shall dawn for thee her saffron footcloths spread, Sunset her purple canopies and red, In serried splendour, and the night unfold Her velvet darkness wrought with starry gold For kingly raiment, soft as cygnet-down. My hair shall braid thy temples like a crown Of sapphires, and my kiss upon thy brows Like çithar-music lull thee to repose, Till the sun yield thee homage of his light.
O king, thy kingdom who from thee can wrest? What fate shall dare uncrown thee from this breast, O god-born lover, whom my love doth gird And armour with impregnable delight Of Hope's triumphant keen flame-carven sword?
# The Golden Threshold/Poems/In the Forest

IN THE FOREST
Here, O my heart, let us burn the dear dreams that are dead, Here in this wood let us fashion a funeral pyre Of fallen white petals and leaves that are mellow and red, Here let us burn them in noon's flaming torches of fire.
We are weary, my heart, we are weary, so long we have borne The heavy loved burden of dreams that are dead, let us rest, Let us scatter their ashes away, for a while let us mourn; We will rest, O my heart, till the shadows are gray in the west.
​But soon we must rise, O my heart, we must wander again Into the war of the world and the strife of the throng; Let us rise, O my heart, let us gather the dreams that remain, We will conquer the sorrow of life with the sorrow of song.
# The Golden Threshold/Poems/My Dead Dream

MY DEAD DREAM
Have you found me, at last, O my Dream? Seven seons ago You died and I buried you deep under forests of snow. Why have you come hither? Who bade you awake from your sleep And track me beyond the cerulean foam of the deep?
Would you tear from my lintels these sacred green garlands of leaves? Would you scare the white, nested, wild pigeons of joy from my eaves? Would you touch and defile with dead fingers the robes of my priest? Would you weave your dim moan with the chantings of love at my feast?
​Go back to your grave, O my Dream, under forests of snow, Where a heart-riven child hid you once, seven aeons ago. Who bade you arise from your darkness? I bid you depart! Profane not the shrines I have raised in the clefts of my heart.
# The Golden Threshold/Poems

POEMS
# The Golden Threshold/Poems/Leili

LEILI
The serpents are asleep among the poppies, The fireflies light the soundless panther's way To tangled paths where shy gazelles are straying, And parrot-plumes outshine the dying day. O soft! the lotus-buds upon the stream Are stirring like sweet maidens when they dream.
A caste-mark on the azure brows of Heaven, The golden moon burns sacred, solemn, bright, The winds are dancing in the forest-temple, And swooning at the holy feet of Night. Hush! in the silence mystic voices sing And make the gods their incense-offering.
# The Golden Threshold/Poems/Life

LIFE
Children, ye have not lived, to you it seems Life is a lovely stalactite of dreams, Or carnival of careless joys that leap About your hearts like billows on the deep In flames of amber and of amethyst.
Children, ye have not lived, ye but exist Till some resistless hour shall rise and move Your hearts to wake and hunger after love, And thirst with passionate longing for the things That burn your brows with blood-red sufferings.
Till ye have battled with great grief and fears, And borne the conflict of dream-shattering years, Wounded with fierce desire and worn with strife, Children, ye have not lived: for this is life.