OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Reports/Volume 517

* 517 U.S. 1 (1996) Wisconsin v. City of New York
* 517 U.S. 25 (1996) Barnett Bank of Marion County, N. A. v. Nelson
* 517 U.S. 44 (1996) Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida
* 517 U.S. 186 (1996) Morse v. Republican Party of Virginia
* 517 U.S. 292 (1996) Rutledge v. United States
* 517 U.S. 308 (1996) O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.
* 517 U.S. 314 (1996) Lonchar v. Thomas
* 517 U.S. 343 (1996) Liang-Houh Shieh v. Kakita
* 517 U.S. 345 (1996) Bowersox v. Williams
* 517 U.S. 348 (1996) Cooper v. Oklahoma
* 517 U.S. 370 (1996) Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc.
* 517 U.S. 392 (1996) Holly Farms Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
* 517 U.S. 416 (1996) Carlisle v. United States (517 U.S. 416)
* 517 U.S. 456 (1996) United States v. Armstrong
* 517 U.S. 484 (1996) 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island
* 517 U.S. 535 (1996) United States v. Noland
* 517 U.S. 544 (1996) United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc.
* 517 U.S. 559 (1996) BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore
* 517 U.S. 620 (1996) Romer v. Evans
* 517 U.S. 654 (1996) Henderson v. United States (517 U.S. 654)
* 517 U.S. 681 (1996) Doctor's Associates Inc v. Casarotto
* 517 U.S. 690 (1996) Ornelas v. United States
* 517 U.S. 706 (1996) Quackenbush v. Allstate Insurance Company
* 517 U.S. 735 (1996) Smiley v. Citibank, N. A.
* 517 U.S. 748 (1996) Loving v. United States
* 517 U.S. 781 (1996) Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
* 517 U.S. 793 (1996) Richards v. Jefferson County, Alabama
* 517 U.S. 806 (1996) Whren v. United States
* 517 U.S. 830 (1996) Exxon Company v. Sofec, Inc.
* 517 U.S. 843 (1996) United States v. International Business Machines Corp.
* 517 U.S. 882 (1996) Lockheed Corp v. Spink
* 517 U.S. 952 (1996) Bush v. Vera
* 517 U.S. 1301 (1996) Tuggle v. Netherland
# United States Reports/Volume 518

* 518 U.S. 1 (1996) Jaffee v. Redmond
* 518 U.S. 37 (1996) Montana v. Egelhoff
* 518 U.S. 81 (1996) Koon v. United States
* 518 U.S. 120 (1996) Melendez v. United States
* 518 U.S. 137 (1996) Leavitt, Governor of Utah v. Jane L.
* 518 U.S. 149 (1996) Calderon, Warden v. Moore
* 518 U.S. 152 (1996) Gray v. Netherland, Warden
* 518 U.S. 187 (1996) Lane v. Pena, Secretary of Transportation
* 518 U.S. 213 (1996) United States v. Reorganized CF&I Fabricators of Utah, Inc.
* 518 U.S. 231 (1996) Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.
* 518 U.S. 267 (1996) United States v. Ursery
* 518 U.S. 322 (1996) Lewis v. United States (518 U.S. 322)
* 518 U.S. 343 (1996) Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey
* 518 U.S. 415 (1996) Gasperini v. Center For Humanities, Inc.
* 518 U.S. 470 (1996) Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr
* 518 U.S. 515 (1996) United States v. Virginia
* 518 U.S. 604 (1996) Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. Federal Election Commission
* 518 U.S. 651 (1996) Felker v. Turpin, Warden
* 518 U.S. 668 (1996) Board of County Commissioners, Wabaunsee County, Kansas v. Umbehr
* 518 U.S. 712 (1996) O'Hare Truck Service, Inc. v. City of Northlake
* 518 U.S. 727 (1996) Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
* 518 U.S. 839 (1996) United States v. Winstar Corp.
* 518 U.S. 938 (1996) Pennsylvania v. Labron
# United States Reports/Volume 51

10 How.[ard], ( 13 L.Ed. )
* 51 U.S. 1 The State of Missouri v. The State of Iowa the State of Iowa
* 51 U.S. 56 Isaac Shelby v. John Bacon Alexander Symington Thomas Robins James Robertson Richard H Bayard James S Newbold Herman Cope Thomas S Taylor and George Beach
* 51 U.S. 72 (1790) John McNulty v. John Batty Robert Shaw Daniel Wann and Thomas C Legate
* 51 U.S. 81 Sylvester Preston William Kendall William Nichols and William Phillips v. Charles Bracken
* 51 U.S. 82 (1798) Jacob Strader James Gorman and John Armstrong v. Christopher Graham
* 51 U.S. 99 James Wilson v. George a Sanford and Robert G Musgrove
* 51 U.S. 102 Alfred Downs v. Joseph Kissam
* 51 U.S. 109 (1802) Jesse Hoyt v. The United States
* 51 U.S. 144 Ex Parte: in the Matter of Henry Rhodes v. The Steamship Galveston
* 51 U.S. 146 (1846) Granville Oldfield v. William H Marriott
* 51 U.S. 174 William Hallett v. Sidney E. Collins
* 51 U.S. 187 (1821) Sherburne Sears v. Joseph R Eastburn
* 51 U.S. 190 (1845) William Woodruff v. Frederick W Trapnall
* 51 U.S. 218 (1850) Paup v. Drew
* 51 U.S. 224 James Trigg Richard Pryor and John Paup v. Thomas S Drew As Governor of the State of Arkansas and Successor of Archibald Yell Deceased
* 51 U.S. 225 (1849) Philip Greely Junior v. William Thompson
* 51 U.S. 242 (1798) Hugh Maxwell v. Nathaniel L Griswold George Griswold George W Gray and George Griswold Junior
* 51 U.S. 257 James Gilmer v. George Poindexter
* 51 U.S. 270 Charles Barnard Abel Adams George Barnard and Charles Larkin v. Joseph Adams Andrew H Bennet and Joseph Fletcher
* 51 U.S. 311 (1789) Thomas Henderson and Thomas Calloway v. The State of Tennessee
* 51 U.S. 329 James Stimpson v. The Baltimore and Susquehanna Railroad Company
* 51 U.S. 348 (1845) Isaac Landes v. Joshua B Brant
* 51 U.S. 376 The Philadelphia Wilmington and Baltimore Railroad Company v. The State of Maryland
* 51 U.S. 395 The Baltimore and Susquehanna Railroad Company v. Alexander Nesbit and Penelope D Goodwin
* 51 U.S. 402 John Butler Levi Reynolds Junior and William Overfield Late Board of Canal Commissioners of Pennsylvanias v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
* 51 U.S. 419 The Washington Alexandria and Georgetown Steam Packet Company v. Frederick E Sickles and Truman Cook
* 51 U.S. 442 (1839) The United States v. Jehiel Brooks
* 51 U.S. 461 The Louisville Manufacturing Company v. Michael Welch
* 51 U.S. 477 (1843) Charles Gayler and Leonard Brown v. Benjamin G Wilder
* 51 U.S. 511 The Town of East Hartford v. The Hartford Bridge Company
* 51 U.S. 541 Jos Argote Villalobos Marie Rose and Francois Felix Marquis De Fougeres v. The United States
* 51 U.S. 557 Edward St John v. Zebulon a Paine
* 51 U.S. 586 (1848) Isaac Newton v. John H Stebbins
* 51 U.S. 609 (1798) The United States v. Jean Baptiste D'Auterive
* 51 U.S. 627 (1236) Merritt Robinson v. Wm J Minor
# United States Reports/Volume 514

* 514 U.S. 1 (1995) Arizona v. Evans
* 514 U.S. 35 (1995) Swint v. Chambers County Commission
* 514 U.S. 52 (1995) Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.
* 514 U.S. 73 (1995) Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. Schoonejongen
* 514 U.S. 87 (1995) Shalala v. Guernsey Memorial Hospital
* 514 U.S. 115 (1995) Goeke v. Branch
* 514 U.S. 122 (1995) Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Department of Labor v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company
* 514 U.S. 143 (1995) Anderson v. Edwards
* 514 U.S. 159 (1995) Qualitex Company v. Jacobson Products Company, Inc.
* 514 U.S. 175 (1995) Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.
* 514 U.S. 208 (1995) Whitaker v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco County
* 514 U.S. 211 (1995) Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.
* 514 U.S. 268 (1995) Shalala v. Whitecotton
* 514 U.S. 280 (1995) Freightliner Corporation v. Myrick
* 514 U.S. 291 (1995) Heintz v. Jenkins
* 514 U.S. 300 (1995) Celotex Corporation v. Edwards
* 514 U.S. 334 (1995) McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission
* 514 U.S. 386 (1995) Stone v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
* 514 U.S. 419 (1995) Kyles v. Whitley
* 514 U.S. 476 (1995) Rubin v. Coors Brewing Company
* 514 U.S. 499 (1995) California Department of Corrections v. Morales
* 514 U.S. 527 (1995) United States v. Williams (514 U.S. 527)
* 514 U.S. 549 (1995) United States v. Lopez
* 514 U.S. 645 (1995) New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Insurance Company
* 514 U.S. 669 (1995) United States v. Robertson (514 U.S. 669)
* 514 U.S. 673 (1995) Kansas v. Colorado
* 514 U.S. 695 (1995) Hubbard v. United States
* 514 U.S. 725 (1995) City of Edmonds v. Oxford House, Inc.
* 514 U.S. 749 (1995) Reynoldsville Casket Company v. Hyde
* 514 U.S. 765 (1995) Purkett v. Elem
* 514 U.S. 779 (1995) U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton
* 514 U.S. 927 (1995) Wilson v. Arkansas
* 514 U.S. 938 (1995) First Options v. Kaplan
* 514 U.S. 1081 (2000) Arizona v. California (514 U.S. 1081)
* 514 U.S. 1094 (1995) Baby Richard, by His Guardian Ad Litem, O'Connell v. Kirchner
# United States Reports/Volume 516

* 516 U.S. 1 (1995) Wood v. Bartholomew
* 516 U.S. 10 (1995) Tuggle v. Netherland
* 516 U.S. 16 (1995) Citizens Bank of Maryland v. Strumpf
* 516 U.S. 22 (1995) Louisiana v. Mississippi (516 U.S. 22)
* 516 U.S. 29 (1995) Libretti v. United States
* 516 U.S. 59 (1995) Field v. Mans
* 516 U.S. 85 (1995) National Labor Relations Board v. Town & Country Electric, Inc.
* 516 U.S. 99 (1995) Thompson v. Keohane
* 516 U.S. 122 (1995) Louisiana v. Mississippi (516 U.S. 122)
* 516 U.S. 124 (1995) Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca
* 516 U.S. 137 (1995) Bailey v. United States (516 U.S. 137)
* 516 U.S. 152 (1996) Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Company
* 516 U.S. 163 (1996) Lawrence Lawrence v. Chater
* 516 U.S. 193 (1891) Stutson v. United States
* 516 U.S. 199 (1996) Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. v. Calhoun
* 516 U.S. 217 (1996) Zicherman v. Korean Air Lines Company, Ltd.
* 516 U.S. 233 (1996) Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland International, Inc.
* 516 U.S. 235 (1996) Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Lundy
* 516 U.S. 264 (1996) Bank One Chicago, N. A. v. Midwest Bank & Trust Company
* 516 U.S. 284 (1996) Neal v. United States
* 516 U.S. 297 (1996) Attwood v. Singletary
* 516 U.S. 299 (1996) Behrens v. Pelletier
* 516 U.S. 325 (1990) Fulton Corporation v. Faulkner
* 516 U.S. 349 (1996) Peacock v. Thomas
* 516 U.S. 363 (1996) Jones v. ABC-TV
* 516 U.S. 365 (1996) United States v. Maine
* 516 U.S. 367 (1996) Matsushita Electric Industrial Company, Ltd. v. Epstein
* 516 U.S. 400 (1996) Norfolk and Western Railway Company v. Hiles
* 516 U.S. 415 (1996) United States Federal Communications Commission v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia
* 516 U.S. 417 (1996) Hercules, Inc. v. United States
* 516 U.S. 442 (1996) Bennis v. Michigan
* 516 U.S. 474 (1996) Dalton v. Little Rock Family Planning Services
* 516 U.S. 479 (1996) Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.
* 516 U.S. 489 (1996) Varity Corporation v. Howe
* 516 U.S. 930 (1995) Erhard v. C.I.R. (Certiorari Denied)
* 516 U.S. 1301 (1996) Federal Communications Commission v. Radiofone, Inc. (Opinion in Chambers)
# United States v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation

United States Supreme Court
304 U.S. 156
United States v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation
Argued: March 29-30, 1938. --- Decided: April 25, 1938
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Texas.
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Daniel W. Knowlton, of Washington, D.C., for appellants.
Messrs. Luther M. Walter and John S. Burchmore, both of Chicago, Ill., for appellees.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Paine Lumber Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
206 U.S. 467
United States v. Paine Lumber Company
Argued: April 15, 1907. --- Decided: May 27, 1907
Solicitor General Hoyt and Mr. Henry C. Lewis for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Charles Barber and J. C. Thompson for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Tower of Ivory

Tower of Ivory
BY ARCHIBALD MACLEISH
With a Foreword by LAWRENCE MASON Assistant Professor of English in Yale College
NEW HAVEN: YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON: HUMPHREY MILFORD OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS MDCCCCXVII
Copyright, 1917 By Yale University Press
First printed, November, 1917
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Certain of the following poems have appeared in The Yale Review and Harper's Weekly. To the editors and owners of these magazines the author desires to express his appreciation of their courtesy in permitting him to reprint.
CONTENTS
PAGE
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1982, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 41 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Towards a New Central Europe

* "Towards a New Central Europe" in The New Europe, 6 (77) (4th April, 1918)
* "Towards a New Central Europe" in The Bohemian Review, 2 (5) (May, 1918)
# Tower

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Tower."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* The Tower (1928), a collection of poetry by W. B. Yeats
* "The Tower" (1928), a poem by W. B. Yeats
* "Tower," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/3rd Congress/1st Session/Chapter 16

Chap. ⅩⅥ.—An Act transferring, for a limited time, the Jurisdiction of Suits and Offences from the District to the Circuit Court of New Hampshire, and assigning certain Duties in respect to Invalid Pensioners, to the Attorney of the said District.
Actions pending in district court of New Hampshire removed to next circuit court.Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That all actions commenced or pending in the district court of New Hampshire be removed to the next circuit court to be holden in that district, there to be tried and determined, in the same manner, as if the recognizance of such actions had been originally given to the said circuit court: And the said circuit court is hereby vested with the cognizance of all actions, crimes and offences, by the laws now in force, cognizable in the said district court, and with all the powers and authorities of the said district ​court; and any judge of the supreme court of the United States, is authorized to do and perform all the duties, by any law of the United States enjoined upon the said district judge, except as is herein after provided; the fees to be the same as in the district court, in all such cases.
Claims to invalid pensions in N. Hampshire transferred to district attorney. 1793, ch. 17.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the duties enjoined the district judges, by the act “to regulate the claims to invalid pensions,” be, and the same are hereby transferred, as far as relates to the district of New Hampshire, to the attorney of the said district, whose duty it shall be to perform the same.
Limitation of this act.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That this act shall continue in force until the end of the next session of Congress, or until a new district judge be appointed in that district, and no longer.
Approved, April 3, 1794.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/3rd Congress/1st Session/Chapter 24

Chap. ⅩⅩⅣ.—An Act providing for raising and organizing a Corps of Artillerists and Engineers.
Troops to be raised for three years. 1802, ch. 9.Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the number of seven hundred and sixty-four non-commissioned officers, privates and artificers, to serve as privates and musicians, shall be engaged for the term of three years, by voluntary enlistments; and that the proper proportion of commissioned officers shall be appointed to command the same.
How incorporated with the corps of artillery. To be denominated corps of artillerists and engineers.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the aforesaid commissioned and non-commissioned officers, privates, artificers and musicians, shall be incorporated with the corps of artillery now in the service of the United States, and denominated the corps of artillerists and engineers, and that the entire number of the said corps, exclusively of the commissioned officers, shall be nine hundred and ninety-two.
Organization.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That the organization of the said corps be as herein mentioned, to wit: One lieutenant-colonel commandant, one adjutant, one surgeon; four battalions, each to consist of one major, one adjutant and paymaster, and one surgeon’s mate; and four companies, each to consist of one captain, two lieutenants, two cadets with the pay, clothing and rations of a sergeant, four sergeants, four corporals, forty-two privates, sappers and miners, and ten artificers to serve as privates, and two musicians.
Pay and allowance.Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That the additional commissioned officers, non-commissioned officers, privates, artificers and musicians, by this act directed to be raised, shall receive the same pay and allowances in all respects, as the troops already in the service of the United States; and they shall also be governed by the same rules and articles of war, which have been, or may be by law established.
President how to employ said corps.Sec. 6. And be it further enacted, That the President of the United States shall cause such proportions of the said corps to serve in the field, on the frontiers, or in the fortifications of the sea-coast, as he shall deem consistent with the public service.
Approved, May 9, 1794.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/3rd Congress/1st Session/Chapter 13

This act was printed twice in the Statutes at Large. The duplicate is at United States Statutes at Large/Volume 6/3rd Congress/1st Session/Chapter 13.
Chap. ⅩⅢ.—An Act allowing Major General La Fayette his Pay and Emoluments while in the service of the United States.
Allowance to General La Fayette.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That there be allowed to Major General La Fayette the sum of twenty-four thousand, four hundred and twenty-four dollars, being the amount of the pay and emoluments of a major-general during the time he was in the service of the United States, and that the same be paid out of any monies which may be in the treasury and not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, March 27, 1794.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/3rd Congress/1st Session/Chapter 17

Chap. ⅩⅦ.—An Act to authorize the President of the United States in certain cases to alter the place for holding a session of Congress.
President of United States in certain cases authorized to alter place for holding a session of Congress. 1799, ch. 12.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That whenever the Congress shall be about to convene, and, from the prevalence of contagious sickness, or the existence of other circumstances, it would, in the opinion of the President of the United States, be hazardous to the lives or health of the members to meet at the place to which the Congress shall then stand adjourned, or at which it shall be next by law to meet, the President shall be, and he hereby is authorized, by proclamation, to convene the Congress at such other place as he may judge proper.
Approved, April 3, 1794.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/3rd Congress/1st Session/Chapter 18

Chap. ⅩⅧ.—An Act to provide for placing buoys on certain rocks off the harbor of New London, and in Providence river, and other places.
Secretary of Treasury to place buoys off certain harbors.Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of the Treasury be authorized and directed to cause to be placed buoys on the rocks called Black Ledge, or Southwest Ledge, Goshen Reef, Bartlet’s Reef, and Race Rock, off the harbor of New London, in the state of Connecticut, at an expense, not to exceed the sum of twelve hundred dollars; and to cause to be erected a beacon, and to be placed two buoys in the harbor of Portsmouth, in the state of New Hampshire, at an expense, not to exceed the sum of three hundred dollars: And likewise, to cause to be placed in Providence river, in the state of Rhode Island, and in Savannah river, in the state of Georgia, and at the mouth of the same, buoys, not exceeding ten in number, for each river, and at an expense, not to exceed the sum of five hundred dollars, for each; the same to be placed in such parts of the said rivers, as he may judge most advantageous for the navigation thereof, respectively.
Appropriation therefor.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That there be appropriated and paid out of the monies arising from the duties on imports and tonnage, the sum of two thousand five hundred dollars for the purpose aforesaid.
Approved, April 5, 1794.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 1/3rd Congress/1st Session/Chapter 21

Chap. ⅩⅩⅠ.—An Act limiting the Time for presenting Claims for destroyed Certificates of certain Descriptions.
Limitation of claims for renewal of certain certificates.Section 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That all claims for the renewal of certificates of the unsubscribed debt of the ​United States, of the descriptions commonly called “Loan Office Certificates,” or “Final Settlements,” which may have been accidentally destroyed, shall be forever barred and precluded from settlement or allowance, unless the same shall be presented at the treasury, on or before the first day of June, in the year one thousand seven hundred and ninety-five.
Proceedings to be had for establishing claims.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That no claim shall be allowed for the renewal of loan office certificates destroyed before the fourth day of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty-nine, unless the destruction of the same was advertised, according to the resolution of Congress, of the tenth day of May, one thousand seven hundred and eighty; or before that time, was notified to the office from which the same was issued, nor shall claims be allowed for the renewal of loan office certificates destroyed on or after the said fourth day of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty-nine, nor of final settlement certificates destroyed at any time, unless the destruction of the same was so far made public, as to be known to at least two credible witnesses, soon after it happened, and shall have been before the presentation of the claim, as hereinafter provided, advertised for at least six weeks successively, in some one of the newspapers of the state in which the destruction happened; and also, in some one of the newspapers of the state in which the certificate issued, if that was another state; the advertisement or advertisements, in such ease, expressing with as much precision as possible, the number, date and amount of the certificate alleged to have been destroyed, and the name of the person to whom the same was issued, together with the time when, the place where, and the means by which the same was destroyed.
By whom and how long to be received.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That all claims for the renewal of destroyed certificates, of either of the descriptions aforesaid, not precluded by this act, shall be receivable, with the evidence in support of the same, by the Auditor of the Treasury, until the said first day of June, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-five, and shall, by the accounting officers of the treasury, be duly examined; and if satisfactorily supported, the claimants shall be entitled to receive certificates of registered debt, equal to the specie value of the loan office or final settlement certificates so proved to have been destroyed.
Approved, April 21, 1794.