OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Intelligence and Security Committee Russia report/Annex

* related portals: Government of the United Kingdom.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
Layout 2
# Intelligence and Security Committee Russia report/Classified Oral and Written Evidence

* related portals: Government of the United Kingdom.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
CCS1019402408 978-1-5286-1686-7
Layout 2
# Within my reach!

* "Almost!" in Poems (1890)
* "Within my reach!" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# Withnell v. Ruecking Construction Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
249 U.S. 63
Withnell v. Ruecking Construction Company
Argued: and Submitted Jan. 16, 1919. --- Decided: March 3, 1919
Messrs. E. T. Allen and C. B. Allen, both of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 64-65 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Frank B. Coleman and George M. Block, both of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 65-66 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice DAY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Withnell v. William R. Bush Construction Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
216 U.S. 603
Withnell v. William R. Bush Construction Company
Decree affirmed with costs by a divided court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Withnell v. William R. Bush Construction Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
216 U.S. 603
Withnell v. William R. Bush Construction Company
Messrs. Edmund T. Allen and Clifford B. Allen for appellant.
Mr. E. C. Kehr for respondents.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Within that little Hive

Within that little Hive Such Hints of Honey lay As made Reality a Dream And Dreams, Reality —
# Within the Tides

THE PLANTER OF MALATA
* CHAPTER I
* CHAPTER II
* CHAPTER III
* CHAPTER IV
* CHAPTER V
* CHAPTER VI
* CHAPTER VII
* CHAPTER VIII
* CHAPTER IX
* CHAPTER X
* CHAPTER XI
* CHAPTER XII
THE PARTNER
THE INN OF THE TWO WITCHES--A FIND
BECAUSE OF THE DOLLARS
* CHAPTER I
* CHAPTER II
Footnotes:
{1} The gallows, supposed to be widowed of the last executed criminal and waiting for another.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1924, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 99 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ives v. Sargent

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
119 U.S. 652
Ives v. Sargent
H. T. Blake, for appellant, Ives.
J. S. Beach and John K. Beach, for appellee, Sargent.
MATTHEWS, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ivey v. Texas/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
344 U.S. 801
Grady IVEY, appellant, v. STATE OF TEXAS.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ivey v. Texas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
344 U.S. 801
Grady IVEY, appellant, v. STATE OF TEXAS.
Mr. L. N. D. Wells, Jr., for appellant.
Messrs. Price Daniel, Attorney General of Texas, and Willis E. Gresham and Calvin B. Garwood, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ivinson v. Hutton

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Ivinson v. Hutton."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Ivinson v. Hutton (98 U.S. 79)
* Ivinson v. Hutton (119 U.S. 604)
# Ivinson v. Hutton (119 U.S. 604)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
119 U.S. 604
Ivinson v. Hutton
S. Shellabarger and J. B. Wilson, for appellant, Edward ivinson.
W. W. Corlett, for appellees, Hutton and others.
MILLER, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# JSC News Release Log 1990/90-004

Distributed Earth Model Orbiter Simulation Used During STS-32
A new graphic display first used in Mission Control during the space shuttle Atlantis' October 1989 flight will again provide three-dimensional views of the Shuttle and Earth during shuttle mission STS-32, Columbia's flight scheduled for launch this month.
The Distributed Earth Model Orbiter Simulation (DEMOS) is a joint project between the Mission Operations Directorate and the Mission Support Directorate. The display is based on live position and attitude data from the shuttle and provides a color view of the way the shuttle looks as it orbits the Earth. The view is presented as if seen from a variety of imaginary points, ranging from a look at the whole planet with an exaggerated shuttle orbiter circling it to a rear-position view of the orbiter as it reenters the atmosphere, barking as it slows for approach and landing.
Although it is based on live data, the display is driven by predicted simulations of the Orbiter's position during times when such data is not available. In addition to showing the Earth and the shuttle, the display will include the Sun, the Moon, 100 of the brightest navigational stars, and payloads, including the Long Duration Exposure facility (LDEF) scheduled to be brought back to Earth on STS-32. The groundtrack of the shuttle also will be displayed as part of the new graphic.
The new display will be projected on one of the four large screens that flank the 10-foot by 20-foot global tracking map at the front of the Flight Control Room. DEMOS is not a replacement graphic for the global tracking map, nor a graphic that has been certified for use in makirg operational mission decisions. For STS-32, DEMOS will be used only during periods of high activity and interest, including the rendezvous with LDEF and landing.
DEMOS has been developed by a small team in the Mission Operations Systems Lab at JSC. Its development is part of a continuing effort to upgrade the graphics and information displayed for flight controllers to aid them in visualizing the Orbiter's positions.
# JSC News Release Log 1990/90-008

Proposals Sought for Satellite Servicer Flight Demonstration
NASA's Johnson Space Center, Houston, has issued a call for proposals for requirement definition studies and preliminary design for a Satellite Servicer System flight demonstration.
The Satellite Servicer System flight demonstration will show the ability to maintain satellites in locations not readily accessible to humans (e.g., polar and high inclination orbits), to permit hazardous servicing, to reduce Space Transportation System extravehicular activity dependency and to improve cost efficiencies.
The system will be used in a three-phase, on-orbit flight demonstration launched from the Space Shuttle orbiter. The demonstration will exercise autonomous rendezvous and docking, orbital replacement unit exchange and fluid transfer capabilities, and will use existing technologies, including the Orbital Manuevering Vehicle and elements of the flight Telerobotic Servicer, to minimize costs and reduce technical risks.
The flight demonstration Phase B studies, estimated at $1.3 million each, will include the design and definition of the servicer system, a target vehicle, and ground and on-orbit control stations. Two firm, fixed-price, Phase B contracts, with a 12-month period of performance, are expected to be awarded this summer. Responses to the request for proposals, released Jan. 19, are due March 5.
Phase B project managment resides at JSC's New Initiatives office, Satellite Servicing Project Office.
# JSC News Release Log 1990/90-009

Science Payload Commanders Named; Carter Replaces Cleave on IML-1
In a move to provide long range leadership in the development and planning of payload crew science activities, four Space Shuttle mission specialists currently assigned to STS missions have been designated as payload commanders.
The payload commanders will have overall crew responsibility for the planning, integration and on orbit coordination of payload/Space Shuttle activities on their mission. The crew commander will retain overall responsibility for mission success and safety of flight.
Named as payload commander for STS-42, the first flight of the International Microgravity Laboratory (IML-01) set for late 1990, is mission specialist Norman E. Thagard, M.D. In addition, Navy Capt. Manley L. "Sonny" Carter, M.D., has been named as a mission specialist on the IML crew, replacing Mary L. Cleave, Ph.D., who has resigned her flight assignment for personal reasons.
Kathryn D. Sullivan, Ph.D., will serve as payload commander for STS-45, the first flight of the Atmospheric Laboratory for Applications and Science (ATLAS-01), slated for launch in 1991.
Payload commander for STS-46 is Jeffrey A. Hoffman, Ph.D. The STS-46 mission, set for 1991, will feature the first flights of the European Retrievable Carrier (EURECA), developed by the European Space Agency, and the Tethered Satellite System, a joint project between NASA and the Italian space agency, Agenzia Spaziale Italiana.
Air Force Lt. Col. Mark Lee will be the payload commander on mission STS-47 for Spacelab-J, a joint science venture between NASA and the Japanese National Space Development Agency, NASDA, also in 1991.
​Future assignments of payload commanders normally will be made in advance of the remainder of the flight crew in order to help identity and resolve training issues and operational constraints prior to crew training.
The role of the payload commander also is expected to serve as a foundation for the development of a space station mission commander concept.
-end-
# JSC News Release Log 1990/90-011

Hernandez Engineering Awarded Information Support Contract
NASA's Johnson Space Center (JSC), Houston, has awarded a contract to Hernandez Engineering, Inc., Houston, for technical information and public affairs support. The basic period of performance began Jan. 1, 1990.
The cost-plus-fixed-fee contract is for a basic year effort plus four l-year options. Estimated cost and fee for the basic year is valued at $7.7 million. If the options are exercised, the contract value will increase by $8.1 million for the first option, $8.5 million for the second option, $9.1 million for the third option and $9.7 million for the last option.
The effort involves approximately 205 employees, both at JSC and in other designated locations. The contract includes providing public affairs support services, correspondence and communications management, security support services, information resource management, documentation management, technical information support services and duplication, reproduction, microforms and distribution management.
The new contract was awarded under the 8(a) Small Business Administration program. The previous contractor, Omniplan, Inc., had provided these services to JSC since 1981 and is no longer under the 8(a) program.
- end -
# JSC News Release Log 1990/90-007

Note to Editors: STS-32 Post Flight Crew Press Conference
The astronaut crew of Shuttle mission STS-32 will meet with news media next week to discuss their recent flight which featured the deployment of a SYNCOM-IV satellite and the retrieval of the Long Duration Exposure Facility (LDEF).
The news conference will be held at 1 pm central time on Tuesday, January 30, at the Johnson Space Center and will be broadcast live on NASA Select television. Accredited media who wish to participate may do so in the building 2 briefing room at JSC, or via support audio from other NASA field centers.
NASA Select programming is carried on RCA SATCOM F2R, transponder 13, located at 72 degrees West Longitude.
# JSC News Release Log 1990/90-005

Revised
Note to Editors: STS-32 Inflight Crew Press Conference
A press conference with the STS-32 astronauts aboard the Space Shuttle Columbia will be conducted at 8:02 a.m. CST Saturday, January 13. Duration will be approximately 20 minutes.
Accredited news media who wish to participate must be located in room 135, building 2 at the Johnson Space Center in Houston. Participants should be in place by 7:50 a.m. CST.
The news conference will be broadcast live on NASA Select television and available for live use and rebroadcast. NASA Select programming is carried on RCA SATCOM F2R, transponder 13, located at 72 degrees West Longitude. Media may also monitor the event live from various NASA field centers.
# JSC News Release Log 1990/90-010

Fluor-Daniel Services, Inc. Awarded Construction Contract
NASA's Johnson Space Center (JSC), Houston, has selected Flour-Daniel Services, Inc., Greenville, S.C., for negotiations leading to award of a cost-plus-award-fee contract for construction support services. The first contract year will begin on or about Feb. 1, 1990.
The contract covers a planned 5-year performance period which includes a 1-year basic period plus four 1-year options. Proposed cost and fee for the 5-year program, including yearly options, is approximately $27.5 million.
Services to be provided by Flour-Daniel include management, planning and execution of a broad variety of construction tasks at JSC, including the alteration of an existing physical plant.
- end -
# JSC News Release Log 1990/90-012

EPA, NASA White Sands Test Facility Enter Consent Agreement
NASA has entered into a formal consent agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding assessment of groundwater contamination at the White Sands Test Facility (WSTF). The agreement recognizes contamination assessment work accomplished by NASA at WSTF since 1986, and it identifies the additional steps needed at WSTF to complete the assessment and determine whether remedial action is necessary.
NASA has confirmed that the groundwater beneath WSTF has been contaminated with low levels of hazardous constituents, principally trichloroethylene and Freon. The major source of the contamination appears to have resulted from the original construction of WSTF in the mid-1960s when organic solvents were used to precision clean piping. In addition, the on-site cleaning facility has used various solvents and degreasing agents to meet operational and testing requirements.
WSTF has established operating procedures for the management of hazardous wastes that comply with both the EPA and New Mexico environmental regulations. These safeguards are preventing the introduction of additional contaminants into the groundwater.
While test results have indicated that contamination has migrated beyond the facility boundaries, no hazardous chemicals have been detected in drinking water supplies, including the NASA/WSTF water supplies located 3.5 and 4 miles from the facility boundary.
The agreement language reflects a cooperative working relationship between NASA and the EPA which permits an efficient and effective approach to assuring protection of human health and the environment. NASA is continuing its assessment efforts under the agreement and will keep the public fully informed of the results.
​WSTF operates as an organizational element of the Johnson Space Center. Facilities at WSTF include spacecraft propulsion system test facilities and materials test laboratories. Established in 1963, the facility actively supported the Apollo, Skylab, Viking and other NASA programs. WSTF presently performs development, evaluation and qualification testing of Space Shuttle propulsion systems, materials and components. Materials testing in support of the Space Station Freedom Program was initiated in 1989, and propulsion testing will begin in 1991.
-end-
# JSC News Release Log 1990/90-003

Note to Editors: STS-32 Inflight Crew Press Conference
A press conference with the STS-32 astronauts aboard the Space Shuttle Columbia will be conducted at 9:12 a.m. CST Saturday, January 13. Duration will be approximately 17 minutes.
Accredited news media who wish to participate must be located in room 135, building 2 at the Johnson Space Center in Houston. Participants should be in place by 9 a.m. CST.
The news conference will be broadcast live on NASA Select television and available for live use and rebroadcast. NASA Select programming is carried on RCA SATCOM FR, transponder 13, located at 72 degrees West Longitude. Media may also monitor the event live from various NASA field centers.
# Wyoming ex rel. Wyoming Agricultural College v. Irvine

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
206 U.S. 278
Wyoming ex rel. Wyoming Agricultural College v. Irvine
Argued: April 19, 22, 1907. --- Decided: May 13, 1907
The plaintiff in error the state of Wyoming, on the relation of the Wyoming Agricultural College and its officers, filed a petition in the supreme court of that state for a writ of mandamus against the defendant in error, the state treasurer. The object of the proceeding was to compel the state treasurer to pay to the treasurer of the college certain funds in his hands, being the proceeds of land grants and the amount of appropriations made by Congress for the promotion of education in agricultural and mechanical arts. An alternative writ issued, and the respondent appeared and demurred to the petition. The cause was then heard by the supreme court of Wyoming, and by that court the demurrer, which was regarded by court and counsel as sufficiently raising the merits of the controversy, was sustained and judgment rendered for the respondent. The case comes here upon writ of error, with allegations of violations of Federal rights, which, so far as material to the decision, are stated in the opinion.
Messrs. Porter B. Coolidge, Fenimore Chatterton Samuel T. Corn, and A. E. L. Leckie for plaintiffs in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 279-280 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Timothy F. Burke, W. E. Mullen, Nellis Corthell, Charles W. Burdick, and John W. Lacey for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 280-281 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Moody delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wyoming Valley

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Wyoming Valley."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Wyoming Valley," in The American Cyclopædia (1879)
* "Wyoming Valley," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Wyoming Valley," in The New Student's Reference Work, Chicago: F.E. Compton and Co. (1914)
* "Wyoming Valley," in The Encyclopedia Americana, New York: The Encyclopedia Americana Corporation (1920)
* "Wyoming Valley," in Collier's New Encyclopedia, New York: P. F. Collier & Son Co. (1921)
# Wyoming v. Colorado

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Wyoming v. Colorado."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Wyoming v. Colorado (243 U.S. 622)
* Wyoming v. Colorado (259 U.S. 419)
* Wyoming v. Colorado (260 U.S. 1)
* Wyoming v. Colorado (286 U.S. 494)
* Wyoming v. Colorado (309 U.S. 572)
* Wyoming v. Colorado (353 U.S. 953)
# Wyoming v. Colorado (243 U.S. 622)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
243 U.S. 622
Wyoming v. Colorado
Argued: December 6, 7, and 8, 1916. ---

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wynn v. Morris

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
61 U.S. 3
Wynn v. Morris
THIS case was brought up from the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas, by a writ of error issued under the 25th section of the judiciary act.
The case is fully stated in the opinion of the court.
It was submitted on printed arguments, by Mr. Pike for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. Watkins and Mr. Bradley for the defendant.
The arguments upon both sides were directed almost entirely to the merits of the case; the question of jurisdiction was made by the counsel for the defendant in this manner:
If the decision of the court below had been against the right claimed by Mrs. Taylor, under the act of Congress of the 29th of May, 1830, she would have had a right of appeal, but Wynn would not; although the case might be said to involve the construction of that act, because, confessendly, he does not claim any right under it.
The decision being in favor of the right, there is no ground left for the appellate jurisdiction of this court to rest upon, unless the plaintiff can make it appear that the decision of the court below involved the construction of the act of September 4th, 1841, and was against a right claimed under that act for granting lands to the State of Arkansas.
But, according to the case made by the bill, the State does not and cannot claim any title to this land under the act of 1841. Whether the plaintiff ever acquired any right to it from the State or under the selection, is purely a question of contract, or of private grievance, as between him and the State. True, he must trace his title back to the act of 1841. But in that sense, every disputed land case might come up to this court, as all titles are more or less remotely derived from the United States.
Mr. Justice CATRON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse