OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Battle of Philiphaugh/Auchindown

AUCHINDOWN.
At Auchindown, the tenth of June, Sae merry, blythe, and gay, Sir, Each lad and lass did fill a glass,
​We drank a health, and nae by stealth, ’Mang kimmers bright and lordly: “King James the Eighth! for him we’ll fight, And down wi’ cuckold Geordie!”
We took a spring, and danc’d a fling, And wow but we were vogie! We didna fear, though we lay near The Campbells, in Stra’bogie;
Nor yet the loons, the black dragoons, At Fochabers a-raising: If they durst come, we’d pack them home, And send them to their grazing.
We fear’d no harm, and no alarm, No word was spoke of dangers; We join’d the dance, and kiss’d the lance, And swore us foes to strangers,
To ilka name that dar’d disclaim Our Jamie and his Charlie. “King James the Eighth! for him we’ll fight, And down the cuckold carlie!”
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Battle of Philiphaugh/The Battle of Philiphaugh

THE BATTLE OF PHILIPHAUGH.
ON Philiphaugh a fray began, At Hairhead wood it ended
The Scots out o’er the Graemes they ran, Sae merrily they bended.
Sir David frae the border came, Wi’ heart an’ hand came he; Wi’ him three thousand bonnie Scots, To bear him company.
Wi’ him three thousand valiant men, A noble sight to see! A cloud o’ mist them weel concealed, As close as e’er might be.
When they came to the Shaw burn, Said he, “Sae weel we frame, I think it is convenient, That we should sing a psalm.”
When they came to the Lingly burn. As day-light did appear. They spy’d an aged father,
​ “Come hither, aged father!” Sir David he did cry, “And tell me where Montrose lies, With all his great army.
“But, first, you must come tell to me, If friends or foes you be; I fear you are Montrose’s men, Come frae the north country.”
“No, we are nane o’ Montrose’s men, Nor e’er intend to be; I am Sir David Lesly, That’s speaking unto thee.”
“If you’re Sir David Lesly, As I think weel ye be, I’m sorry ye ha’e brought so few Into your company.
“There’s fifteen thousand armed men, Encamped on yon lee; Ye’ll never be a bite to them, For aught that I can see.
“But, halve your men in equal parts, Your purpose to fulfil; Let ae half keep the water side, The rest gae round the hill.
“Your nether party fire must, Then beat a flying drum; And then they’ll think the day’s their ain,
​“Then, those that are behind them maun Gi’e shot, baith grit and sma’; And so, between your armies twa, Ye may make them to fa’.”
“O were ye ever a soldier?” Sir David Lesly said; “O yes; I was at Solway flow, Where we were all betray’d.
“Again I was curst at Dunbar, And was a pris’ner ta’en: And many a weary night and day, In prison I ha’e lien.”
“If ye will lead these men aright, Rewarded shall ye be; But, if that ye a traitor prove, I’ll hang thee on a tree.”
“Sir, I will not a traitor prove; Montrose has plundered me; I’ll do my best to banish him Away frae this country.”
He halv’d his men in equal parts, His purpose to fulfil; The one part kept the water side, The other gaed round the hill.
The nether party fired brisk, Then turn’d and seem’d to rin; And then they a’ came frae the trench,
​The rest then ran into the trench, And loos’d their cannons a’; And thus, betweeen his armies twa, He made them fast to fa’.
Now, let us a* for Lesly pray, And his brave company! For they ha’e vanquish’d great Montrose, Our cruel enemy.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Balzac/Preface

Excusing himself for not undertaking to write a life of Balzac, Monsieur Brunetiere, in his study of the novelist published shortly before his death, refused somewhat disdainfully to admit that acquaintance with a celebrated man's biography has necessarily any value. "What do we know of the life of Shakespeare?" he says, "and of the circumstances in which Hamlet or Othello was produced? If these circumstances were better known to us, is it to be believed and will it be seriously asserted that our admiration for one or the other play would be augmented?" In penning this quirk, the eminent critic would seem to have wilfully overlooked the fact that a writer's life may have much or may have little to do with his works. In the case of Shakespeare it was comparatively little—and yet we should be glad to learn more of this little. In the case of Balzac it was much. His novels are literally his life; and his life is quite as full as his books of all that makes the good novel at once profitable and agreeable to read. It is not too much to affirm that any one who is acquainted with what is known to-day of the strangely chequered career of the author of the Comedie Humaine is in a better position to understand and appreciate the different parts which constitute it. Moreover, the steady rise of Balzac's reputation, during the last fifty years, has been in some degree owing to the various patient investigators who have gathered information about him whom Taine pronounced to be, with Shakespeare and Saint-Simon, the greatest storehouse of documents we possess concerning human nature.
The following chapters are an attempt to put this information into sequence and shape, and to insert such notice of the novels as their relative importance requires. The author wishes here to thank certain French publishers who have facilitated his task by placing books for reference at his disposal, Messrs. Calmann-Levy, Armand Colin, and Hetzel, in particular, and also the Curator of the Musee Balzac, Monsieur de Royaumont who has rendered him service on several occasions.
# Balzac v. Porto Rico

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Balzac v. Porto Rico, 258 U.S. 298 (1922), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that certain provisions of the U.S. Constitution did not apply to territories not incorporated into the union. It originated when Jesús M. Balzac was prosecuted for criminal libel in a district court of Puerto Rico. Balzac declared that his rights had been violated under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution as he was denied a trial by jury, since the code of criminal procedure of Puerto Rico did not grant a jury trial in misdemeanor cases. In the appeal, the Supreme Court affirmed the judgments of the lower courts on the island in deciding that the provisions of the Constitution did not apply to a territory that belonged to the United States but was not incorporated into the Union. It has become known as one of the "Insular Cases".
United States Supreme Court
258 U.S. 298
Balzac v. People of Porto Rico
Argued: March 20, 1922. --- Decided: April 10, 1922
Mr. Jackson H. Ralston, of Washington, D. C. for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Grant T. Trent, of Washington, D. C., for the People of Porto Rico.
[Argument of Counsel from page 299 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Buy Defence Bonds

buy
DEFENCE BONDS
£5 AND UPWARDS
3% INTEREST
LEND
TO DEFEND
THE RIGHT TO
BE FREE
FROM BANKS AND POST OFFICES
This work is in the public domain worldwide because it was created by a public body of the United Kingdom with Crown Status and commercially published before 1974.
See Crown copyright artistic works, Crown copyright non-artistic works and List of Public Bodies with Crown Status.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Buxton v. Traver

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
130 U.S. 232
Buxton v. Traver
Wm. Craig and Douglas Dyrenforth, for plaintiffs in error.
A. L. Rhodes and W. J. Curtis, for defendants in error.
FIELD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Buy National Savings Certificates

| buy | NATIONAL SAVINGS CERTIFICATES |
| 15’-each · worth 17’6 in 5 years 20’6 in 10 years ||
| FROM POST OFFICES BANKS & NATIONAL SAVINGS GROUPS | SAVE your way to VICTORY |
This work is in the public domain worldwide because it was created by a public body of the United Kingdom with Crown Status and commercially published before 1974.
See Crown copyright artistic works, Crown copyright non-artistic works and List of Public Bodies with Crown Status.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Beasts in Cassocks: The Crimes of the Heads of the Russian Greek Catholic Orthodox Church in America/Chapter 2

CHAPTER II.
I Come to America
Having obtained letters of introduction to Platon, Greek-Orthodox Bishop of North America, from Stefan, Archbishop of Moghi-
Father J. Slunin, Archpresbyter
lev; Flavian, the Metropolitan of Kiev, and from Ivan Ivanoyitch Barnatny, Government Supervisor of Schools, I left, in June, 1913, for America. I was one of the forty-eight members of the so-called ​Moscow Excursion, consisting of educators, lawyers and men of other learned professions who came here to make a study of this country. Among the most well known members of the "Excursion" were Professor Lapinsky of St. Vladimir University of Kiev, Professor Maximeiko of the University of Kharkov, Professor Yurchik of the University of Kazan, and others. We sailed from the port of Libau, and arrived in New York on July 4th.
On July 5th, 1913, two Russian clergymen came to meet me on board of our steamer "Czar." They had been informed by those who had given me the letters to Archbishop Platon, that I had left
Father John Dudikoff
for America. These two clergymen, Father John Chepelev and Father John Slunin, took me off the boat and escorted me to the Russian Ecclesiastical Consistory. They introduced me to His Eminence the Rt. Rev. Archbishop Platon. The Archbishop read my three letters of introduction in my presence, gave me his blessing, and told Father John Slunin, who was connected with the Consistory, to find an apartment for me.
# Beasts in Cassocks: The Crimes of the Heads of the Russian Greek Catholic Orthodox Church in America/Chapter 19

CHAPTER XIX.
Platon Repays Me With "Interest"
On my return to Petrograd, I found out in the office of the Holy Synod that Platon Rozhdesvensky was appointed Archbishop in Kishinev. At the suggestion of a Synod official, I sent a petition ​to Archbishop Platon of Kishinev, in which I asked for money. No reply came. I wrote several times with the same result. I came to Russia on May 15, 1915, and after having petitioned Platon in vain about the refund of my money which he had taken for safekeeping in the American Mission Bank I returned to my native town, and sent Platon my home address. Soon after I came to my relatives in the town of Cherikov, in the Government of Moghilov. Four Gendarmes came to my house and made a most
Gregory Kuneshewsky, "Czar’s Spy" for United States.
thorough search from within and without, but found nothing compromising. Yet, their colonel declared that I was to be placed under arrest. I replied that I had not come to Russia to be arrested, and added that I had declared my intention to become a American citizen and, taking out my first papers, I showed them to the infuriated Colonel. He glanced at the papers and in his ​rage tore it to pieces, shouting: "I don't give a damn for your American citizenship, while you are a Russian subject we have the right to treat you in accordance with our Russian law." Seeing an infuriated crowd of Gendarmes about me who in their rage were wielding their swords and revolvers, shouting that I was a spy sent to destroy the Monarchy, I told them that I had come on account of very important personal matters, which pertained to the Holy Synod. To this the colonel of the Gendarmes replied: "We know why you came back." and he enjoined me not to divulge any of their inhuman behaviour. Thus, although I was wholly innocent, I was arrested and incarcerated in the Fortress of Peter and Paul, in the underground cell No. 16, where I stayed from June 29 to August 16. During this period I was frequently called for examination. I was shown photographs of Russians who had been in America. The photographs were inscribed with comments about the individual concerned. If one had returned to Russia, his photograph was marked "returned"; if he was under arrest, his photo was marked "returned—taken," exactly as mine, which I was shown at the examination. I also noticed confidential reports by Gregory Kunashexsky who runs a steamship office in New York, and also by Victor Hartz. Information against me as well as against others who had been in America was signed by these two men, who apparently were informers, employed by the Russian General Consulate in New York.
# Beasts in Cassocks: The Crimes of the Heads of the Russian Greek Catholic Orthodox Church in America/Chapter 20

CHAPTER XX.
I Meet The Czar
On August 16, 1915, I was commandeered to the Reserve Officers' Corps in Moscow, and attached to the Second Grenadiers' Regiment of His Imperial Highness, Grand Duke Michael Alexandrowitch. I was appointed Captain of the Sixth Company. A week later I was sent to the Nortwest Front. After three months I was wounded and taken to the hospital in Wilno. While there I wrote twice to Platon in Kishiniev, requesting him to return my money. I received no answer. After having recuperated from my wound, ​I was again sent to the front. After a short period I was ordered by the Corps Commander to go to General Headquarters in the city of Moghilev, under the command of General Alexyev. On May 17, 1916, I was appointed Adjutant at the High Commander in Chief's quarters, where I succeeded in obtaining an audience with His Imperial Majesty, Emperor Nicholas Alexandrowitch, to whom I presented my complaint against Platon, recently appointed Exarch of Georgia, in the Caucasus. The Emperor said to me'
Nicholas II—Last Czar of Russia.
"I'm sorry, I can't see him immediately. According to rumors that have been reaching me since 1905 he is a very degraded person, indeed. Yes," he added: "All this is true, and Peter Arkadyevitch (Stolypin) was right. The edifice is large, its pillars are strong, but it will not stand the strain and must collapse. Evidently, German espionage is in full swing." There were present at this ​conversation, which lasted a whole hour, Constantine, the Archbishop of Moghilev, and the Generals, Alexeyev, Scherbachev and Nicholas Nicholayevitch Duchonin. When I was about to take my leave, His Majesty addressed these parting words to me:
"Do not worry, my son. … Everything will be done to
The First Revolution.
cleanse the Orthodox Russian Church from its foulness." I thanked the Emperor and departed. Two days later, I was again summoned to the Czar, quite unexpectedly, by General Duchonin. During ​this second brief audience of mine with the Emperor, General Duchonin said to me: "Try to see Platon personally, don't pay much atttention to the money question, but instead try to sound him on his political views." I was given leave of absence and went to Platon, the Exarch of Georgia, in the City of Tiflis, and carried out this secret mission in detail.
# Beasts in Cassocks: The Crimes of the Heads of the Russian Greek Catholic Orthodox Church in America/Chapter 22

CHAPTER XXII.
Platon Instigates the Beiliss Blood Accusation
The murder just described was not the final chapter in Platon's "exploits." He planned another crime, and if he had been successful, he would have stigmatized the entire Jewish people. He got in touch with the notorious hangman Silberman, whose specialty it was to put to death political offenders, many of whom were entirely innocent of any wrong doing. With the help of Silberman, Platon birbed Vera Cheberiak. This Vera Cheberiak, a woman of the Kiev underworld, first killed her own children in order to avoid suspicion. A few days later the same fate befell the young boy Andrey Yushchinsky who was lured to one of the sheds of Zaitzev's brick factory and murdered. It was Vera Cheberiak who killed him. After the murder, Vera Cheberiak, together with Silberman, who was present at the murder of Yushchinsky, lay in ambush for Mendel Beiliss, foreman of the factory, who, they knew, had to pass the shed on his way to work. He passed that memorable morning as usual and came across Yushchinsky's dead body. Very much frightened, he was about to run away, but the detectives, who lay in wait for him, egged on by the accusations of Vera Cheberiak and Silberman, took him into custody. The Beiliss affair, it will be remembreed, caused a world-wide sensation. Prosecutors and defenders flocked from all ends of the world. My father, in spite of the warnings on the part of a few very important statesmen, asked Feodor Plevako, the well-known barrister, to take upon ​himself the defense of the innocently accused Beiliss. Plevako together with Karabchevsky and other eminent members of the Russian legal profession, undertook the case. Beiliss was acquitted, and Silberman committed suicide on the spot. Vera Cheberiak was sentenced to hard labor and on the way to Siberia also committed suicide.
It was only on the fourth day I succeeded in seeing Platon and that too, owing to the solicitation of Mr. Popov, Procurator of the Tiflis Synod office. To my request to refund my money, Platon replied: "I'll let you know in a week. I'll probably pay you in dollars, but first I must make inquiries." This was the only time I saw him in Tiflis.
# Callender v. Florida

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Callender v. Florida."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Callender v. Florida (380 U.S. 519)
* Callender v. Florida (383 U.S. 270)
# Callender v. Florida (380 U.S. 519)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
380 U.S. 519
Callender v. Florida
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgments are reversed. Boynton v. Com. of Virginia, 364 U.S. 454, 81 S.Ct. 182, 5 L.Ed.2d 206, Abernathy v. State of Alabama, 380 U.S. 447, 85 S.Ct. 1101.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Callender v. Florida (383 U.S. 270)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
383 U.S. 270
Herbert E. CALLENDER et al. v. FLORIDA.
The mandate of this Court in this case issued on the 21st day of May, 1965, is hereby recalled and the judgment heretofore entered on the 26th day of April, 1965, is hereby vacated. The order of the Court dated the 26th day of April, 1965, granting the writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida is vacated.
Treating the papers submitted as a petition for a writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgments are reversed. Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454, 81 S.Ct. 182, 5 L.Ed.2d 206; Abernathy v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 447, 85 S.Ct. 1101, 14 L.Ed.2d 151.
Mr. Justice FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Callender v. United States

Callender v. United States, Hempst. 334, 4 F. Cas. 1074 (D. Ark. 1846) (No. 2321), before the Hon. Benjamin Johnson, District Judge
United States District Court for the District of Arkansas
Hempst. 334
ANN M. CALLENDER ET AL. v. THE UNITED STATES
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
September 8, 1846.—Petition to confirm a Spanish grant under the act of 1824 (4 Stat. 52), determined in the District Court of Arkansas, before the Hon. Benjamin Johnson, district judge.
S. Janin and S. L. Johnson, for petitioners.
S. H. Hempstead, district attorney, for the United States.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Callen v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
332 U.S. 625
Callen v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company
Argued: Dec. 18, 1947. --- Decided: Jan 12, 1948
Mr. B. Nathaniel Richter, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner pro hac vice by special leave of Court.
Mr. Philip Price, of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Callender v. Florida (380 U.S. 519)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
380 U.S. 519
Callender v. Florida
Carl Rachlin and Floyd McKissick, for petitioners.
James W. Kynes, Atty. Gen. of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Callender v. Florida (383 U.S. 270)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
383 U.S. 270
Herbert E. CALLENDER et al. v. FLORIDA.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Callender v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
​JOHNSON, J., held, that as this petition was to confirm the grant to the Baron de Bastrop, lying principally, as it appeared from the record, in the State of Louisiana, the court there was the proper tribunal to entertain jurisdiction over the claim, and that this court should not do so; and that the objection to the jurisdiction of this court urged by the district attorney was well taken, and that the petition ought to be dismissed.
Petition dismissed.
# Bank of the Metropolis v. New England Bank

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Bank of the Metropolis v. New England Bank."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Bank of the Metropolis v. New England Bank (42 U.S. 234)
* Bank of the Metropolis v. New England Bank (47 U.S. 212)
# Bank of West Tennessee v. Citizens' Bank of Louisiana

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
81 U.S. 9
Bank of West Tennessee v. Citizens' Bank of Louisiana
MOTION by Mr. Edward Janin (Mr. T. J. Durant opposing) to dismiss, for want of jurisdiction, a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, taken under an assumption that the case fell within the 25th section of the Judiciary Act, quoted supra, pp. 5, 6.
Mr. Justice SWAYNE stated the case, and delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse