OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Franklin Lane v. Watts

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
235 U.S. 17
Franklin Lane v. Watts
Argued: November 2, 1914. ---
Assistant Attorney General West and Mr. C. Edward Wright for petition.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 18-20 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. G. H. Brevillier, James W. Vroom, and Herbert Noble, opposed.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Reports/Volume 131

* 131 U.S. 1 (1889) United States v. Jones
* 131 U.S. 21 (1889) United States v. Drew
* 131 U.S. 22 (1889) Kennon v. Gilmer
* 131 U.S. 31 (1889) Allman v. United States
* 131 U.S. 36 (1889) United States v. Davis
* 131 U.S. 40 (1889) Terry v. Sharon
* 131 U.S. 50 (1889) United States v. Hall
* 131 U.S. 55 (1889) United States v. Perrin
* 131 U.S. 58 (1889) United States v. Reilly
* 131 U.S. 60 (1889) Palmer v. Arthur
* 131 U.S. 65 (1889) Spalding v. Manasse
* 131 U.S. 66 (1889) Abendroth v. Van Dolsen
* 131 U.S. 75 (1889) Douglass v. Lewis
* 131 U.S. 88 (1889) Fowle v. Park
* 131 U.S. 100 (1889) United States Mutual Accident Association v. Barry
* 131 U.S. 123 (1889) Thompson v. Hubbard
* 131 U.S. 151 (1889) Stewart v. Masterson
* 131 U.S. 159 (1889) Cornely v. Marckwald
* 131 U.S. 162 (1889) Coler v. City of Cleburne
* 131 U.S. 176 (1889) Ex parte Nielsen
* 131 U.S. 191 (1889) City of New Orleans v. Christmas
* 131 U.S. 220 (1889) City of New Orleans v. United States
* 131 U.S. 221 (1889) Parker
* 131 U.S. 227 (1889) Stickney v. Stickney
* 131 U.S. 240 (1889) Crehore v. Ohio M. Railway Company
* 131 U.S. 246 (1889) Morgan v. Struthers
* 131 U.S. 258 (1889) Bacon v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
* 131 U.S. 267 (1889) Savin
* 131 U.S. 280 (1889) Cuddy
* 131 U.S. 287 (1889) Segrist v. Crabtree
* 131 U.S. 293 (1889) Veach v. Rice
* 131 U.S. 319 (1889) Hawkins v. Glenn
* 131 U.S. 336 (1889) Embrey v. Jemison
* 131 U.S. 352 (1889) Mellen v. Moline Malleable Iron Works
* 131 U.S. 371 (1889) Pittsburgh, C. & St. Louis Railway Company v. Keokuk H. Bridge Company
* 131 U.S. 390 (1888) Williams v. Conger
* 131 U.S. 391 (1888) Marshall v. United States
* 131 U.S. 392 (1888) Radford v. Folsom
* 131 U.S. 394 (1888) Pacific Exp. Company v. Malin
* 131 U.S. 396 (1888) List v. State of Pennsylvania
* 131 U.S. 397 (1889) Dent v. Ferguson
* 131 U.S. 401 (1889) Nichols Shepard Company v. Marsh
* 131 U.S. 403 (1889) Hunt v. Blackburn
* 131 U.S. 405 (1889) Freeland v. Williams
* 131 U.S. 427 (1888) American Diamond Rock-Boring Company v. Sheldon
* 131 U.S. 448 (1888) Union Tubing Company v. Patterson Company
# United States Reports/Volume 136

* 136 U.S. 1 (1890) Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States
* 136 U.S. 68 (1890) Ryan v. United States
* 136 U.S. 89 (1890) Kneeland v. American Loan Trust Company Same Ballou
* 136 U.S. 104 (1890) McCall v. People of the State of California
* 136 U.S. 114 (1890) Norfolk v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
* 136 U.S. 121 (1890) Hot Springs Company v. Williamson
* 136 U.S. 130 (1890) Lovell v. Cragin
* 136 U.S. 152 (1890) Cornell University v. Fiske
* 136 U.S. 211 (1890) United States v. State of North Carolina
* 136 U.S. 223 (1890) Union National Bank v. Bank of Kansas City
* 136 U.S. 237 (1890) George Smith Middlings Purifier Company v. McGroarty
* 136 U.S. 242 (1890) Hamilton v. Liverpool London Globe Insurance Company
* 136 U.S. 257 (1890) Palliser v. United States
* 136 U.S. 268 (1890) Chicago Railway Equipment Company v. Merchants' National Bank
* 136 U.S. 287 (1890) Thompson v. Phenix Insurance Company
* 136 U.S. 300 (1890) Allen v. Hanks
* 136 U.S. 313 (1890) State of Minnesota v. Barber
* 136 U.S. 330 (1890) Oteiza v. Jacobus
* 136 U.S. 338 (1890) Saloy v. Bloch
* 136 U.S. 348 (1890) Reynolds v. Adden
* 136 U.S. 356 (1890) Nashua Corp v. Boston L. Railroad Corp
* 136 U.S. 386 (1890) Norris v. Haggin
* 136 U.S. 393 (1890) Texas Ry Company City of Marshall City of Marshall v. Texas P Ry Company
* 136 U.S. 408 (1890) Richelieu Navigation Company v. Boston Marine Insurance Company
* 136 U.S. 436 (1890) In re Kemmler
* 136 U.S. 450 (1890) District of Columbia v. Woodbury
* 136 U.S. 468 (1890) Stevens v. Fuller
* 136 U.S. 479 (1890) State of Indiana v. State of Kentucky
* 136 U.S. 519 (1890) Thaw v. Falls
* 136 U.S. 549 (1890) Gibbons v. Mahon
* 136 U.S. 570 (1889) Sherman v. Robertson
* 136 U.S. 572 (1890) Inland Coasting Company v. Tolson
* 136 U.S. 578 (1890) Irwin v. San Francisco Savings Union
* 136 U.S. 580 (1890) Davenport v. Paris
* 136 U.S. 581 (1890) Mason v. United States
* 136 U.S. 586 (1890) Ex parte Burrus
# United States Reports/Volume 13

9 Cranch, ( 3 L.Ed. )
* 13 U.S. 9 (1815) Mandeville v. Union Bank of Georgetown
* 13 U.S. 11 (1815) Meigs v. M'Clung's Lessee
* 13 U.S. 19 (1815) Simms v. Guthrie
* 13 U.S. 28 (1815) Speake v. United States
* 13 U.S. 39 (1815) Taber v. Perrott and Lee
* 13 U.S. 43 (1815) Terrett v. Taylor
* 13 U.S. 55 (1815) The Brig Short Staple and Cargo v. United States
* 13 U.S. 64 (1815) Parker v. Rule's Lessee
* 13 U.S. 71 (1815) Brig Struggle v. United States
* 13 U.S. 76 (1815) Randolph v. Donaldson
* 13 U.S. 87 (1815) Polk's Lessee v. Wendal
* 13 U.S. 102 (1815) The Ship Richmond v. United States
* 13 U.S. 104 (1815) Arnold v. United States
* 13 U.S. 120 (1815) The St Lawrence Webb Master
* 13 U.S. 122 (1815) Drummond's Administrators v. Magruder Co's Trustees
* 13 U.S. 126 (1815) The Mary Stafford Master
* 13 U.S. 151 (1815) Doe Lessee of Lewis and Wife v. McFarland
* 13 U.S. 153 (1815) Clark's Executors v. Van Riemsdyk
* 13 U.S. 164 (1815) Finley v. Williams
* 13 U.S. 173 (1815) McIver's Lessee v. Walker and Another
* 13 U.S. 180 (1815) Owens v. Hanney
* 13 U.S. 181 (1815) United States v. The Cargo of the Ship Fanny Jennings Master
* 13 U.S. 183 (1815) The Frances Boyer Master
* 13 U.S. 191 (1815) Thirty Hogsheads of Sugar v. Boyle
* 13 U.S. 199 (1815) Evans v. Jordan and Morehead
* 13 U.S. 205 (1815) Cargo of the Ship Hazard v. Campbell
* 13 U.S. 209 (1815) Ship Societe Martinson Master
* 13 U.S. 212 (1815) United States v. Giles
* 13 U.S. 243 (1815) United States v. Job L Barber
* 13 U.S. 244 (1815) The Schooner Andeline and Cargo
* 13 U.S. 289 (1815) the Brig Ann McClain Master
* 13 U.S. 292 (1815) The Town of Pawlet v. Daniel Clark
* 13 U.S. 339 (1815) Otis v. Watkins
* 13 U.S. 359 (1815) The Brig Alerta and Cargo v. Blas Moran
* 13 U.S. 368 (1815) The Grotius Sheafe Master
* 13 U.S. 372 (1815) Gettings v. Burch's Administratix
* 13 U.S. 374 (1815) United States v. Bryan and Woodcock
* 13 U.S. 387 (1815) The Brig Concord Taylor Master
* 13 U.S. 388 (1815) The Nereide Bennett Master
* 13 U.S. 456 (1815) Pratt v. Thomas Law
# United States Reports/Volume 133

* 133 U.S. 1 (1890) United States v. Stowell
* 133 U.S. 21 (1890) Case v. Kelly
* 133 U.S. 30 (1890) Washburn v. Green
* 133 U.S. 49 (1890) Washburn v. Green
* 133 U.S. 50 (1890) Mason v. Pewabic Mining Company Pewabic Mining Company
* 133 U.S. 65 (1890) City and County of San Francisco v. Itsell
* 133 U.S. 67 (1890) Schrader v. Manufacturers' National Bank
* 133 U.S. 78 (1890) Stuart v. Boulware
* 133 U.S. 83 (1890) Ohio Cent Company v. Central Trust Company
* 133 U.S. 92 (1890) Illinois Company v. Bosworth
* 133 U.S. 107 (1890) Cole v. Cunningham
* 133 U.S. 138 (1890) Keyser v. Hitz
* 133 U.S. 152 (1890) Knox County v. Harshman
* 133 U.S. 156 (1890) Farmers' Loan Trust Company v. City of Galesburg
* 133 U.S. 180 (1890) Wallace v. United States
* 133 U.S. 186 (1890) Manning v. French
* 133 U.S. 193 (1890) United States v. Hancock
* 133 U.S. 198 (1890) Board of County Commissioners v. Lewis
* 133 U.S. 208 (1890) United States v. Waters
* 133 U.S. 216 (1890) Coulam v. Doull
* 133 U.S. 233 (1890) Christian v. Atlantic & N. C. Railroad
* 133 U.S. 246 (1890) Geilinger v. Philippi
* 133 U.S. 258 (1890) De Geofroy v. Riggs
* 133 U.S. 273 (1890) United States v. Mosby
* 133 U.S. 290 (1890) Beals v. Illinois, M. & T. Railroad Company
* 133 U.S. 296 (1890) Adams v. Conner
* 133 U.S. 299 (1890) Street v. United States
* 133 U.S. 308 (1890) Corbin v. Gould
* 133 U.S. 315 (1890) Smith v. Lyon
* 133 U.S. 320 (1890) Buford v. Houtz
* 133 U.S. 333 (1890) Davis v. Beason
* 133 U.S. 349 (1890) Burt v. Evory
* 133 U.S. 360 (1890) Phoenix Caster Company v. Spiegel
* 133 U.S. 370 (1890) Coyne v. Union Pacific Railway Company
* 133 U.S. 375 (1890) Quebec Company v. Merchant
* 133 U.S. 380 (1890) Hopkins v. McLure
* 133 U.S. 387 (1890) California Insurance Company v. Union Compress Company
* 133 U.S. 423 (1890) Mills v. Allen
* 133 U.S. 433 (1890) Armstrong v. American Exchange National Bank
* 133 U.S. 471 (1890) Gage v. Kaufman
* 133 U.S. 473 (1890) Board of Commissioners v. Diebold Safe Lock Company
* 133 U.S. 496 (1890) Wisconsin Central Company v. Price County
* 133 U.S. 514 (1890) Burthe v. Denis
* 133 U.S. 523 (1890) Inhabitants of the Township of Bernards v. Morrison
* 133 U.S. 529 (1890) Lincoln County v. Luning
* 133 U.S. 534 (1890) Fogg v. Blair
* 133 U.S. 541 (1890) Sturr v. Beck
* 133 U.S. 553 (1890) Searl v. School-Dist. No. 2
* 133 U.S. 566 (1890) St. Louis Railway Company v. Johnston
* 133 U.S. 579 (1890) Gregory v. Stetson
* 133 U.S. 587 (1890) Louisville v. State of Mississippi
* 133 U.S. 595 (1890) Aspinwall v. Butler
* 133 U.S. 610 (1890) Keller v. Ashford
* 133 U.S. 626 (1890) Shepherd v. Pepper
* 133 U.S. 655 (1890) Culver v. Uthe
* 133 U.S. 660 (1890) Palmer v. McMahon
* 133 U.S. 670 (1890) Peters v. Bain
* 133 U.S. 697 (1890) Boesch v. Graff
# United States Reports/Volume 135

* 135 U.S. 1 (1890) Cunningham v. Neagle
* 135 U.S. 100 (1890) Leisy v. Hardin
* 135 U.S. 161 (1890) Lyng v. State of Michigan
* 135 U.S. 167 (1890) Mackall v. Mackall
* 135 U.S. 176 (1890) Commercial Manufacturing Company Consolidated v. Fairbank Canning Company
* 135 U.S. 195 (1890) Vicksburg Company v. Smith
* 135 U.S. 200 (1890) United States ex rel. Miller v. Raum
* 135 U.S. 207 (1890) Central Trust Company v. Grant Locomotive Works
* 135 U.S. 227 (1890) St. Germain v. Brunswick
* 135 U.S. 232 (1890) Lodge v. Twell
* 135 U.S. 237 (1890) Hartranft v. Meyer
* 135 U.S. 244 (1890) Beatty v. Benton
* 135 U.S. 255 (1890) United States v. Chase
* 135 U.S. 263 (1890) In re Mills
* 135 U.S. 271 (1890) Sanborn v. United States
* 135 U.S. 286 (1890) Iron Silver Mining Company v. Campbell
* 135 U.S. 304 (1890) Societe Fonciere et Agricole Des Etats Unis v. Milliken
* 135 U.S. 309 (1890) Willard v. Wood
* 135 U.S. 315 (1890) Northern Pacific Company v. Austin
* 135 U.S. 319 (1890) Royer v. Schultz Belting Company
* 135 U.S. 326 (1890) Mansfield v. Excelsior Refinery Company
* 135 U.S. 342 (1890) Yale Lock Manufacturing Company v. Berkshire National Bank
* 135 U.S. 403 (1890) In re Baiz
* 135 U.S. 432 (1890) New York El. Company v. Fifth National Bank
* 135 U.S. 443 (1890) Lane
* 135 U.S. 449 (1890) Burns v. Rosenstein
* 135 U.S. 457 (1890) Jencks v. Quidnick Company
* 135 U.S. 467 (1890) Upshur County v. Rich
* 135 U.S. 478 (1890) Freiburg v. Dreyfus
* 135 U.S. 483 (1890) Anderson v. Carkins
* 135 U.S. 492 (1890) City of Detroit v. Osborne
* 135 U.S. 500 (1890) Norman v. Buckner
* 135 U.S. 507 (1890) West v. Camden
* 135 U.S. 522 (1890) Robinson v. Iron Railway Company
* 135 U.S. 533 (1890) Glenn v. Liggett
* 135 U.S. 550 (1890) United States v. Voorhees
* 135 U.S. 554 (1890) Washington Company v. McDade
* 135 U.S. 576 (1890) Des Moines Ft. Company v. Wabash, St. Louis & P. Railroad Company
* 135 U.S. 584 (1890) Haines v. McLaughlin
* 135 U.S. 599 (1890) Rea v. The Eclipse
* 135 U.S. 609 (1890) Farrar v. Churchill Churchill
* 135 U.S. 621 (1890) Riddle v. Whitehill
* 135 U.S. 641 (1890) Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas Railway Co.
* 135 U.S. 662 (1890) McGahey v. State of Virginia
* 135 U.S. 685 (1890) McGahey v. State of Virginia
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/27th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 3

Chap. III.—An Act to amend the act establishing a district court of the United States at Wheeling, Virginia.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Hereafter two annual terms to be held. That hereafter two annual terms of the district court for the western district of Virginia be holden at the city of Wheeling, commencing on the twenty-fifth March and the twenty-fifth of October, in lieu of the one term of the said district court now directed to be held at Wheeling.
Approved, January 20, 1843.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/27th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 20

Chap. XX.—An Act to re-enact and continue in operation the several acts now in force for the relief of insolvent debtors of the United States.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Acts continued for 3 years, &c. Act of May 27, 1840, ch. 26. That the act entitled, “An act to extend for a longer period the several acts now in force for the relief of insolvent debtors of the United States,” approved the twenty-seventh May, eighteen hundred and forty, and the several acts therein mentioned, shall be, and the same are hereby, re-enacted and continued in force for three years from and after the expiration of the said first-mentioned act, and until the cases which may be depending ​when such first-mentioned act shall expire shall be determined, for the purpose of finally disposing of such cases, and for no other purpose.
Approved, January 28, 1843.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/27th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 26

Chap. XXVI.—An Act for the payment of seven companies of Georgia militia, for services rendered in the years eighteen hundred and forty and eighteen hundred and forty one.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Secretary of War to cause them to be paid. That the Secretary of War cause to be paid the companies of Captains Johnson, Henderson, Knight, Jones, and North, for services rendered in the year eighteen hundred and forty, according to the muster-rolls of said companies, now on file in the War Department, made out and verified by Captain J. Brown, of the United States army; and that he cause to be paid, also, the companies of Captains Jernigan and Sweat, for services rendered in the year eighteen hundred and forty-one, according to the muster-rolls of said companies, now on file in the War Department, as verified by Assistant Adjutant General W. W. S. Bliss, of the United States army; and that the laws and regulations applicable to the payment of the volunteers and militia of the United States govern in the payment of these companies;Appropriation. and that the sum of nineteen thousand three hundred and ninety-nine dollars and eighty-seven cents be, and hereby is, appropriated for the purpose of making said payments, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, February 4, 1843.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/27th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 103

Chap. CIII.—An Act further to continue in force the act for the payment of horses and other property lost in the military service of the United States.
Act of Jan. 18, 1837, ch. 5. Act of Aug. 23, 1842, ch. 185. Act of 18th Jan. 1837, continued for two years. Proviso.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the act entitled “An act to provide for the payment of horses and other property lost in the military service of the United States,” approved on the eighteenth day of January, eighteen hundred and thirty-seven, and which has been continued in force until the end of the present session of Congress, be, and the same is hereby, continued in force for two years from and after the end of the present session of Congress: Provided, That at the end of the last aforesaid term of two years, all claims intended to be provided for by said act, shall be forever barred and irrecoverable before any tribunal whatever:Proviso. Provided further, That in making proof of the loss of a horse, under the provisions of the aforesaid act, for want of forage, the additional proof of hard service connected therewith, shall not be construed to invalidate the proof of such loss by reason of the failure of the Government to furnish forage, the proof or want of forage being satisfactory.
Approved, March 3, 1843.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/27th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 27

Chap. XXVII.—An Act making appropriations for pensions for the half calendar year beginning the first day of January and ending the thirtieth day of June, one thousand eight hundred and forty-three; and for the fiscal year beginning the first day of July, one thousand eight hundred and forty-three, and ending the thirtieth day of June, one thousand eight hundred and forty four.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the following sums be, and the same are hereby, appropriated, out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the payment of pensions for the half calendar year beginning on the first day of January and ending on the thirtieth day of June, one thousand eight hundred and forty-three; and for the fiscal year beginning on the first day of July, one thousand eight hundred and forty-three, and ending on the thirtieth day of June, one thousand eight hundred and forty-four:
Invalid pensions.For invalid pensions for the said half calendar year, eighty-six thousand two hundred and forty dollars; and for the said fiscal year, one hundred and fifty-eight thousand four hundred dollars.
Revolutionary pensions. 1818, ch. 19.For revolutionary pensions under the act of the eighteenth March, one thousand eight hundred and eighteen, for the said half calendar year, seventeen thousand six hundred dollars; and for the said fiscal year, one hundred and ninety-two thousand dollars.
Pensions to widows and orphans. 1836, ch. 362.For pensions to widows and orphans, under the act of fourth of July, one thousand eight hundred and thirty-six, for the said half calendar year, four thousand five hundred dollars; and for the said fiscal year two hundred and twenty-two thousand two hundred and fifty dollars.
Five years’ pensions to widows. 1838, ch. 189.For five years’ pensions to widows, under the act of seventh of July, one thousand eight hundred and thirty-eight, for the said half calendar year, ten thousand dollars; and for the said fiscal year, one hundred and twenty thousand dollars.
​Arrearages and half-pay pensions.For arrearages prior to July, one thousand eight hundred and fifteen, payable through the Third Auditor, for the said half calendar year, one thousand dollars; and for the said fiscal year, two thousand dollars.
For arrearages and half pay pensions, through the Second Auditor, for the said fiscal year, five hundred dollars.
For half pay pensions, payable through the Third Auditor, for the said fiscal year, three thousand dollars.
Approved, February 14, 1843.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 5/27th Congress/3rd Session/Chapter 102

Chap. CII.—An Act granting a pension to certain revolutionary soldiers.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,Pensions to certain widows continued for one year. 1832, ch. 126. 1838, ch. 189. 1842, ch. 191. Resolution of April 16, 1842. That the widow of any person who served in the war of the Revolution in the manner set forth in the act approved the seventh day of June, eighteen hundred and thirty-two, entitled “An act supplementary to the act for the relief of certain surviving officers and soldiers of the Revolution,” and whose widow, in virtue of an act approved the seventh day of July, eighteen hundred and thirty-eight, entitled “An act granting half pay and pensions to certain widows,” and an act approved the sixteenth day of August, eighteen hundred and forty-two, amendatory thereof, and a resolution approved the sixteenth day of August, eighteen hundred and forty-two, entitled “A resolution declarative of the pension act of July seventh, eighteen hundred and thirty-eight,” received, or is entitled to an annuity or pension for the term of five years from the fourth of March, eighteen hundred and thirty-six, shall be entitled to receive the same annuity or pension which she received, or is entitled to receive, under said acts or said resolution, or either of them, for and during the further term of one year from the fourth day of March, eighteen hundred and forty-three, or during such portion of said term as said widow shall survive, subject in all respects, however, to the rules, limitations, and conditions, in and by said acts and resolution made and provided.
Appropriation therefor.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the sum of three hundred and eighty thousand dollars, be, and the same is hereby appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to pay the annuities or pensions in and by this act granted.
Approved, March 3, 1843.
# Fellom v. Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
358 U.S. 56
Fellom v. Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Felix v. Scharnweber

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
125 U.S. 54
Felix v. Scharnweber
B. C. Cook, for plaintiff in error.
Henry Decker, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice GRAY, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fellom v. Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
358 U.S. 56
Fellom v. Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco
Appellants pro se.
Messrs. Dion R. Holm and George E. Baglin, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Denver & R. G. R. Company (150 U.S. 1)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
150 U.S. 1
United States v. Denver & R. G. R. Company
Page 2 Sol. Gen. Maxwell, for the United States.
E. O. Wolcott, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Denver & R. G. R. Company (150 U.S. 16)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
150 U.S. 16
United States v. Denver & R. G. R. Company (150 U.S. 16)
Sol. Gen. Maxwell, for the United States.
E. O. Wolcott, for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse