OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Heald v. District of Columbia (254 U.S. 20)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
254 U.S. 20
Heald v. District of Columbia
Argued: Oct. 18, 1920. --- Decided: Nov 8, 1920
Messrs. A. S. Worthington and Vernon E. West, both of Washington, D. C., for petitioners.
Mr. F. H. Stephens, of Washington, D. C., for the District of Columbia.
Mr. Chief Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Heald v. Rice

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
104 U.S. 737
Heald v. Rice
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of California.
The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. George Hardig and Mr. John H. Boalt for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. Milton A. Wheaton for the defendant in error.
MR. JUSTICE MATTHEWS delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Heald v. District of Columbia (259 U.S. 114)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
259 U.S. 114
Heald v. District of Columbia (259 U.S. 114)
Argued: April 13, 1922. --- Decided: May 15, 1922
Messrs. Vernon E. West and A. S. Worthington, both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 115-120 intentionally omitted]
Mr. F. H. Stephens, of Washington, D. C., for the District of columbia.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# History of the Down Survey (Petty 1851)/Contents

CONTENTS.
PREFATORY REMARKS.
HISTORY OF THE SURVEY.
CHAPTER I.
CHAPTER II.
CHAPTER III.
CHAPTER IV.
CHAPTER V.
CHAPTER VI.
CHAPTER VII.
CHAPTER VIII.
CHAPTER IX.
CHAPTER X.
CHAPTER XI.
CHAPTER XII.
CHAPTER XIII.
CHAPTER XIV.
CHAPTER XV.
CHAPTER XVI.
CHAPTER XVII.
CHAPTER XVIII.
APPENDIX.
# I'm a Soldier in the Army of the Lord

* related portals: Hymns.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
(Transcribed from Library of Congress Archive of Folk Culture AFS 6637 A1, 1942, available on Negro Blues and Hollers, Library of Congress Archive of Folk Culture AFS L59, 1962).
Army of the Lord, In the army, in the army, Just a soldier, just a soldier, In the army of the Lord. Just a soldier, In the Army, Just a soldier, In the Army of the Lord, Just a soldier, In the army.
I'm gonna keep on the top In the army of the Lord. I'm gonna keep on the top In the army. I'm gonna keep on the top In the army of the Lord. I'm gonna keep on the top In the army. I'm gonna keep on the top In the army of the Lord. I'm gonna keep on the top In the army.
In the army, army of the Lord, In the army Just a soldier, Just a soldier, In the army of the Lord Just a soldier, In the army.
# I'm sorry for the Dead—Today—

I'm sorry for the Dead — Today — It's such congenial times Old Neighbors have at fences — It's time o' year for Hay.
And Broad — Sunburned Acquaintance Discourse between the Toil — And laugh, a homely species That makes the Fences smile —
It seems so straight to lie away From all of the noise of Fields — The Busy Carts — the fragrant Cocks — The Mower's Metre — Steals —
A Trouble lest they're homesick — Those Farmers — and their Wives — Set separate from the Farming — And all the Neighbors' lives —
A Wonder if the Sepulchre Don't feel a lonesome way — When Men — and Boys — and Carts — and June, Go down the Fields to "Hay" —
# I've seen a Dying Eye

* "I've seen a dying eye" in Poems (1890)
* "I've seen a dying eye" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# I'm Sitting on Top of the World

* "I'm Sitting on Top of the World" (1925), the original sheet music
* "I'm Sitting on Top of the World" (1928), a rendition performed by Al Jolson in the part-talkie musical film The Singing Fool
# I'm contented you should stay

I’m Contented You Should Stay  For ever and aye If you can take yourself away  Any day.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# I've got an arrow here

I've got an arrow here. Loving the hand that sent it I the dart revere.
Fell, they will say, in "skirmish"! Vanquished, my soul will know By but a simple arrow Sped by an archer's bow.
# I'm ceded—I've stopped being Theirs—

* "Love's Baptism" in Poems (1890)
* "I'm ceded, I've stopped being theirs" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# I've Taken Such a Fancy to You

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Song from the musical The Girl from Montmartre.
[Verse]
    We always meet on busy street,
    Or, somewhere in a crowd,
    We meet on dates when tete-a-tetes,
    Are really not allowed,
    I'd like to get acquainted yet,
    We've really not you see;
    Although somehow I seen to know,
    We'd be good company.
[Chorus]
    I'd like to meet you somewhere in a quiet spot,
    I'd like to tell you what a great idea I've got,
    I'd like to gaze into your pretty eyes;
    I'd like to well, I'll leave you to surmise;
    I fancy you and I would get a long so well
    I'd like to perhaps it isn't wise to tell,
    But I should like to do just what you'd like me to,
    For I've taken such a fancy to you.
[Verse]
    We meet and chat on this and that,
    The kind of talk that's small,
    For all we know it's just as though,
    We haven't met at all,
    When we discuss the fatest fuss,
    I feel it's not worth while;
    The only treat, I have that's sweet
    Is just to see you smile.
[Chorus]
    I'd like to meet you somewhere in a quiet spot,
    I'd like to tell you what a great idea I've got,
    I'd like to gaze into your pretty eyes;
    I'd like to well, I'll leave you to surmise;
    I fancy you and I would get a long so well
    I'd like to perhaps it isn't wise to tell,
    But I should like to do just what you'd like me to,
    For I've taken such a fancy to you.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1949, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 74 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# I've Been Working on the Railroad

* related portals: Song lyrics.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
"American folk song. The first published version appeared as 'Levee Song' in Carmina Princetonia, a book of Princeton University songs published in 1894.
"The 'Someone's in the kitchen with Dinah' section, with its noticeably different melody, is actually an older song that has been absorbed by 'I've Been Working on the Railroad'. It was published as 'Old Joe, or Somebody in the House with Dinah' in London in the 1830s or '40s, with music credited to J. H. Cave. The melody for this section of the song may have been adapted from 'Goodnight, Ladies', written (as 'Farewell Ladies') in 1847 by E. P. Christy. The 'Dinah won't you blow' section is a more modern addition." Warning: template has been deprecated.
* "Levee Song" in Carmina Princetonia (1894).
* "I've Been Working on the Railroad" in English for Teachers by Daniel D. Holt (1974).
# Goldsmith v. George G. Prendergast Construction Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
252 U.S. 12
Goldsmith v. George G. Prendergast Construction Company
Argued: Jan. 13 and 14, 1920. --- Decided: March 1, 1920
Mr. David Goldsmith, of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiffs in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 12-14 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Hickman P. Rodgers, of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice DAY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Goldsmith v. United States Board of Tax Appeals

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
270 U.S. 117
Goldsmith v. United States Board of Tax Appeals
Argued: Nov. 30, 1925. --- Decided: March 1, 1926
Mr. H. Ely Goldsmity, of New York City, pro se.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Goldsmith Jr-Grant Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
254 U.S. 505
Goldsmith Jr-Grant Company v. United States
Argued: Dec. 8, 1920. --- Decided: Jan 17, 1921
Messrs. L. C. Hopkins and C. T. Hopkins, both of Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs in error.
Assistant Attorney General Adams, for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 506-507 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McKENNA delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Goldstein v. Cox

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Goldstein v. Cox."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Goldstein v. Cox (389 U.S. 581)
* Goldstein v. Cox (396 U.S. 471)
# Goldstein v. Cox (389 U.S. 581)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
389 U.S. 581
Goldstein v. Cox
John R. Vintilla, Emauel Eschwege and Novak N. Marku, for petitioners.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, and Daniel M. Cohen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Holidays Ordinance

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Holidays Ordinance."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Holidays Ordinance, 1947 (1 of 1947), an ordinance enacted by the Legislative Council of Hong Kong to define the general holidays. Currently General Holidays Ordinance (Cap. 149).
* Holidays Ordinance, 1951 [F.M. Ordinance 55/1951], an ordinance enacted by the Federal Legislative Council of Malaya relating to similar issues. Currently the Holidays Act 1951 [Act 369].
# Holidays (Emerson)

From fall to spring, the russet acorn
* Holidays in Poems (1847)
* Holidays in Poems (Household Edition, 1904)
# In re Woods/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
143 U.S. 202
In re Woods
In Lau Ow Bew, Petitioner, 141 U.S. 583, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 43, it was held that the power of this court to require a case, in which the judgment and decree of the circuit court of appeals is made final, to be certified for review and determination, as if it had been brought here on appeal or writ of error, could only be properly invoked under section 6 of the act of congress entitled 'An act to establish circuit courts of appeals, and to define and regulate, in certain cases, the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States, and for other purposes,' approved March 3, 1891, (26 St. pp. 826, 828, c. 517,) when questions of gravity and importance were involved.
This must necessarily be so in any view, and especially when it is considered that the circuit courts of appeals were created for the purpose of relieving this court of the oppressive burden of general litigation, which impeded the examination and disposition of cases of public concern, and delayed suitors in the pursuit of justice.
But in the interest of jurisprudence and uniformity of decision, to use the the language of the eminent jurist and statesman who had charge of the bill, provision was made under section 6 for such supervision on our part as would tend to avert diversity of judgments, and guard against inadvertence of conclusion in controversies involving weighty and serious matters.
In the matter of Lau Ow Bew the construciton of acts of congress in the light of treaties with a foreign government, and the status of domicile in respect of natives of one country domiciled in another, a matter of international concern, were brought under consideration upon the record, and we were of opinion that the grounds of the application were sufficient to call for our interposition.
But we do not regard the inquiry as to whether it was settled law in the state of Minnesota that a judgment of dismissal in a former sult, such as pleaded here, was not a bar to a second suit upon the same cause of action, or whether the law in respect of recovery by a servant against his master for injuries received in the course of his employment was properly applied on the trial of this case, as falling within the category of questions of such gravity and general importance as to require the review of the conclusions of the circuit court of appeals in reference to them. The writ of certiorari is denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re Winship

In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970), was a United States Supreme Court decision that held that when a juvenile is charged with an act which would be a crime if committed by an adult, every element of the offense must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, changing the previous standard of preponderance of the evidence. The case has come to stand for a broader proposition, however, which is that in any criminal prosecution, every essential element of the offense must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Concurring Opinion

    Harlan

## Dissenting Opinions

    Burger
    Black
United States Supreme Court
397 U.S. 358
In re Winship
Argued: Jan. 20, 1970. --- Decided: March 31, 1970
Rena K. Uviller, New York City, for appellant.
Stanley Buchsbaum, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellee.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re Winship/Dissent Burger

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Harlan
* Dissenting Opinions Burger Black
* Wikipedia article
Mr. Chief Justice BURGER, with whom Mr. Justice STEWART joins, dissenting.
The Court's opinion today rests entirely on the assumption that all juvenile proceedings are 'criminal prosecutions,' hence subject to constitutional limitations. This derives from earlier holdings, which, like today's holding, were steps eroding the differences between juvenile courts and traditional criminal courts. The original concept of the juvenile court system was to provide a benevolent and less formal means than criminal courts could provide for dealing with the special and often sensitive problems of youthful offenders. Since I see no constitutional requirement of due process sufficient to overcome the legislative judgment of the States in this area, I dissent from further straitjacketing of an already overly restricted system. What the juvenile court system needs is not more but less of the trappings of legal procedure and judicial formalism; the juvenile court system requires breathing room and flexibility in order to survive, if it can survive the repeated assaults from this Court.
Much of the judicial attitude manifested by the Court's opinion today and earlier holdings in this field is really a protest against inadequate juvenile court staffs and facilities; we 'burn down the stable to get rid of the mice.' The lack of support and the distressing growth of juvenile crime have combined to make for a literal breakdown in many if not most juvenile courts. Constitutional problems were not seen while those courts functioned in an atmosphere where juvenile judges were not crushed with an avalanche of cases.
My hope is that today's decision will not spell the end of a generously conceived program of compassionate treatment intended to mitigate the rigors and trauma of exposing youthful offenders to a traditional criminal court; each step we take turns the clock back to the pre-juvenile-court era. I cannot regard it as a manifestation of progress to transform juvenile courts into criminal courts, which is what we are well on the way to accomplishing. We can only hope the legislative response will not reflect our own by having these courts abolished.
# In re a Gentleman, One

We see it each day in the paper, And know that there's mischief in store; That some unprofessional caper Has landed a shark on the shore. We know there'll be plenty of trouble Before they get through with the fun, Because he's been coming the double On clients, has "Gentleman, One".
Alas for the gallant attorney, Intent upon cutting a dash! He starts on life's perilous journey With rather more cunning than cash. And fortune at first is inviting -- He struts his brief hour in the sun -- But, lo! on the wall is the writing Of Nemesis, "Gentleman, One".
For soon he runs short of the dollars, He fears he must go to the wall; So Peters' trust-money he collars To pay off his creditor, Paul; Then robs right and left -- for he goes it In earnest when once he's begun. Descensus Averni -- he knows it; It's easy for "Gentleman, One".
The crash comes as soon as the seasons, He loses his coin in a mine, Or booming in land, or for reasons Connected with women and wine. Or maybe the cards or the horses A share of the damage have done -- No matter, the end of the course is The same: "Re a Gentleman, One."
He struggles awhile to keep going, To stave off detection and shame; But creditors, clamorous growing, Ere long put an end to the game. At length the poor soldier of Satan His course to a finish has run -- And just think of Windeyer waiting To deal with "A Gentleman, One"!
And some face it boldly, and brazen The shame and the utter disgrace; While others, more sensitive, hasten Their names and their deeds to efface. They snap the frail thread which the Furies And Fates have so cruelly spun. May the great Final Judge and His juries Have mercy on "Gentleman, One"!
This work is in the public domain in Australia because it was created in Australia and the term of copyright has expired. According to Australian Copyright Council - Duration of Copyright, the following works are public domain:
* published non-government works whose author died before January 1, 1955,
* anonymous or pseudonymous works and photographs published before January 1, 1955, and
* government works published more than 50 years ago (before January 1, 1974).
This work is also in the public domain in the United States because it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days), and it was first published before 1989 without complying with U.S. copyright formalities (renewal and/or copyright notice) and it was in the public domain in Australia on the URAA date (January 1, 1996). This is the combined effect of Australia having joined the Berne Convention in 1928, and of 17 USC 104A with its critical date of January 1, 1996.
Because the Australian copyright term in 1996 was 50 years, the critical date for copyright in the United States under the URAA is January 1, 1946.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In snow thou comest—

In snow thou comest — Thou shalt go with the resuming ground, The sweet derision of the crow, And Glee's advancing sound.
In fear thou comest — Thou shalt go at such a gait of joy That man anew embark to live Upon the depth of thee.
# I Ain't Got Nobody

[Verse]
    There's a saying going 'round,
    And I begin to think it's true;
    It's awful hard to love someone,
    When they don't care 'bout you;
    Once I had a lovin' man,
    As good as any in this town,
    But now I'm sad and lonely,
    For he's gone and turned me down:
[Chorus]
    I ain't got nobody,
    And nobody cares for me;
    (I got the blues)
    (The weary blues)
    And I'm sad and lonely,
    Won't somebody come and take a chance with me?
    I'll sing sweet love songs, honey, all the time,
    If you'll come and be my sweet baby mine;
    Cause I ain't got nobody,
    And nobody cares for me.
[Verse]
    Won't somebody go and find,
    My man and bring him back to me;
    It's awful hard to be alone,
    And without sympathy;
    Once I was a lovin' gal,
    As good as any in this town,
    But since my daddy left me,
    I'm a gal with heart bowed-down:
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# I Am (Voltairine de Cleyre)

I am! The ages on the ages roll: And what I am, I was, and I shall be: by slow growth filling higher Destiny, And Widening, ever, to the widening Goal. I am the Stone that slept; down deep in me That old, old sleep has left its centurine trace; I am the plant that dreamed; and lo! still see That dream-life dwelling on the Human Face. I slept, I dreamed, I wakened: I am Man! The hut grows Palaces; the depths breed light; Still on! Forms pass; but Form yields kinglier Might! The singer, dying where his song began, In Me yet lives; and yet again shall he Unseal the lips of greater songs To Be; For mine the thousand tongues of Immortality.
# I Am Trusting Thee (Unsourced)

* related portals: Hymns.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
I am trusting Thee, Lord, Jesus, Trusting only Thee; Trusting Thee for full salvation, Great and free.
I am trusting Thee for pardon; At Thy feet I bow; For Thy grace and tender mercy, Trusting now.
I am trusting Thee for cleansing In the crimson flood; Trusting Thee to make me holy By Thy blood.
I am trusting Thee to guide me; Thou alone shalt lead; Every day and hour supplying All my need.
I am trusting Thee for power, Thine can never fail; Words which Thou Thyself shalt give me Must prevail.
I am trusting Thee, Lord Jesus; Never let me fall; I am trusting Thee forever, And for all.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse