OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Frow v. De La Vega/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
82 U.S. 552
Frow v. De La Vega
If the court in such a case as this can lawfully make a final decree against one defendant separately, on the merits, while the cause was proceeding undetermined against the others, then this absurdity might follow: there might be one decree of the court sustaining the charge of joint fraud committed by the defendants; and another decree disaffirming the said charge, and declaring it to be entirely unfounded, and dismissing the complainant's bill. And such an incongruity, it seems, did actually occur in this case. Such a state of things is unseemly and absurd, as well as unauthorized by law.
The true mode of proceeding where a bill makes a joint charge against several defendants, and one of them makes default, is simply to enter a default and a formal decree pro confesso against him, and proceed with the cause upon the answers of the other defendants. The defaulting defendant has merely lost his standing in court. He will not be entitled to service of notices in the cause, nor to appear in it in any way. He can adduce no evidence, he cannot be heard at the final hearing. But if the suit should be decided against the complainant on the merits, the bill will be dismissed as to all the defendants alike-the defaulter as well as the others. If it be decided in the complainant's favor, he will then be entitled to a final decree against all. But a final decree on the merits against the defaulting defendant alone, pending the continuance of the cause, would be incongruous and illegal. This was so expressly decided by the New York Court of Errors, in the case of Clason v. Morris. Spencer, J., says: 'It would be unreasonable to hold, that because one defendant had made default, the plaintiff should have a decree even against him, where the court is satisfied from the proofs offered by the other, that in fact the plaintiff is not entitled to a decree.'
Irregularities, if any occurred in the proceedings after the decree complained of, are not now before us for adjudication.
DECREE REVERSED with costs, and the cause remanded for further proceedings,
IN CONFORMITY WITH THIS OPINION.

## Notes

* ↑ 10 Johnson, 524.
* ↑ See 1 Hoffman's Chancery Practice. 554.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fruit Heights Land Conveyance Act (H.R. 993; 113th Congress)

* related portals: United States Congress.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
H.R. 993 as introduced
113th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 993
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
March 6, 2013
Mr. Bishop of Utah (for himself and Mr. Stewart) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources
A BILL
To provide for the conveyance of certain parcels of National Forest System land to the city of w:Fruit Heights, Utah.

# Section 1. Short title

This Act may be cited as the “Fruit Heights Land Conveyance Act”.

# Sec. 2. Definitions

In this Act:

## (1) City–

The term City means the city of Fruit Heights, Utah.

## (2) Map–

The term map means the map entitled Proposed Fruit Heights City Conveyance and dated September 13, 2012.

## (3) National Forest System land–

The term National Forest System land means the approximately 100 acres of National Forest System land, as depicted on the map.

## (4) Secretary–

The term Secretary means the Secretary of Agriculture.

# Sec. 3. Conveyance of certain land to the city of Fruit Heights, Utah
## (a) In general–

The Secretary shall convey to the City, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the National Forest System land.

## (b) Survey–
### (1) In general–

If determined by the Secretary to be necessary, the exact acreage and legal description of the National Forest System land shall be determined by a survey approved by the Secretary.

### (2) Costs–

The City shall pay the reasonable survey and other administrative costs associated with a survey conducted under paragraph (1).

## (c) Easement–

As a condition of the conveyance under subsection (a), the Secretary shall reserve an easement to the National Forest System land for the Bonneville Shoreline Trail.

## (d) Use of national forest system land–

As a condition of the conveyance under subsection (a), the City shall use the National Forest System land only for public purposes.

## (e) Reversionary Interest–

In the quitclaim deed to the City for the National Forest System land, the Secretary shall provide that the National Forest System land shall revert to the Secretary , at the election of the Secretary, if the National Forest System land is used for other than a public purpose.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Frozen Food Express v. Interstate Commerce Commission

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Harlan
United States Supreme Court
351 U.S. 40
Frozen Food Express v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Argued: and Submitted March 7, 1956. --- Decided: April 23, 1956
Mr.Robert W. Ginnane, Washington, D.C., for I.C.C.
Mr. David G. Macdonald, Washington, .d.C., for East Texas Motor Freight Lines, et al.
Mr. Carl L. Phinney, Dallas, Tex., for Frozen Food Express.
Messrs. Charles P. Reynolds, Washington, d.C., and Carl Helmetag, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant Railroads.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Folk-lore of the Holy Land/A Mohammedan Legend

A MOHAMMEDAN LEGEND
INTRODUCTORY AND APOLOGETIC
“Tainting the air, on a scirocco day, the carcase of a hound, all loathsome, lay in Nazareth’s narrow street. Wayfarers hurried past covering mouth and nostrils, and at last, when purer air they reached, in Eastern style they cursed the dog, and the dog’s owners’ ancestors, and theirs who, bound to care for public cleanliness yet left the nuisance there to poison all around. Then, that same way, there came ’Isa, the son of Mary, of great fame for mighty deeds performed in Allah’s Name. He said, ‘How lovely are its teeth, so sharp, and white as pearls’: then went his way.”
Be the lot, Reader, thine, ’midst many faults to note some beauty shine: some lesson new in Eastern legends old: and, ’mid much dross, to find some grains of gold.
J. E. H.
# Folk-lore of the Holy Land/Dedication/Introduction

​TO MY DEAR WIFE,
WITHOUT WHOSE ENCOURAGEMENT THIS BOOK WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN WRITTEN AND WITHOUT WHOSE HELP ITS MATERIALS COULD NEVER HAVE BEEN COLLECTED, IT IS NOW MOST AFFECTIONATELY DEDICATED. J.E.H.
# Folk-lore of the Holy Land/Dedication

​TO MY DEAR WIFE,
WITHOUT WHOSE ENCOURAGEMENT THIS BOOK WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN WRITTEN AND WITHOUT WHOSE HELP ITS MATERIALS COULD NEVER HAVE BEEN COLLECTED, IT IS NOW MOST AFFECTIONATELY DEDICATED. J.E.H.
# Hague v. CIO/Dissent Butler

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Hughes
* Dissenting Opinions McReynolds Butler
* Separate Opinion Stone
* Wikipedia article
Mr. Justice BUTLER.
I am of opinion that the challenged ordinance is not void on its face; that in principle it does not differ from the Boston ordinance, as applied and upheld by this Court, speaking through Mr. Justice White, in Davis v. Massachusetts, 167 U.S. 43, 17 S.Ct. 731, 42 L.Ed. 71, affirming the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, speaking through Mr. Justice Holmes, in Commonwealth v. Davis, 162 Mass. 510, 39 N.E. 113, 26 L.R.A. 712, 44 Am.St.Rep. 389, and that the decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals should be reversed.
# Hague v. CIO/Dissent McReynolds

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Hughes
* Dissenting Opinions McReynolds Butler
* Separate Opinion Stone
* Wikipedia article
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS.
I am of opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals should be reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the bill. In the circumstances disclosed, I conclude that the District Court should have refused to interfere by injunction with the essential rights of the municipality to control its own parks and streets. Wise management of such intimate local affairs, generally, at least, is beyond the competency of federal courts, and essays in that direction should be avoided.
There was ample opportunity for respondents to assert their claims through an orderly proceeding in courts of the state empowered authoritatively to interpret her laws with final review here in respect of federal questions.
# Hague v. CIO/Concurrence Hughes

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Hughes
* Dissenting Opinions McReynolds Butler
* Separate Opinion Stone
* Wikipedia article
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE HUGHES, concurring:
With respect to the merits I agree with the opinion of Mr. Justice ROBERTS and in the affirmance of the judgment as modified. With respect to the point as to jurisdiction I agree with what is said in the opinion of Mr. Justice ROBERTS as to the right to discuss the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., being a privilege of a citizen of the United States, but I am not satisfied that the record adequately supports the resting of jurisdiction upon that ground. As to that matter, I concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice STONE.
# Hague v. CIO

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization, 307 U.S. 496 (1939), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court. The case involved Jersey City, New Jersey Mayor Frank "Boss" Hague who had in 1937 used a city ordinance to prevent labor meetings in public places and stop the distribution of literature pertaining to the CIO's cause. He referred to them as "communist." Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Concurring Opinion

    Hughes

## Dissenting Opinions

    McReynolds
    Butler

## Separate Opinion

    Stone
United States Supreme Court
307 U.S. 496
Hague v. CIO
Argued: Feb. 27, 28, 1939. --- Decided: June 5, 1939
[Syllabus from pages 496-500 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Charles Hershenstein, Edward J. O'Mara, and James A. Hamill, all of Jersey City, N.J., for petitioners.
Messrs. Morris L. Ernst. of New York City, and Spaulding Frazer, of Newark, N.J., for respondents.
Mr. Justice BUTLER:
The judgment of the court in this case is that the decree is modified and as modified affirmed. Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER and Mr. Justice DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Mr. Justice ROBERTS has an opinion in which Mr. Justice BLACK concurs, and Mr. Justice STONE an opinion in which Mr. Justice REED concurs. The CHIEF JUSTICE concurs in an opinion. Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS and Mr. Justice BUTLER dissent for reasons stated in opinions by them respectively.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered an opinion in which Mr. Justice BLACK concurred.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia, Florida, & Alabama Railway Company v. Blish Milling Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Georgia, Florida, & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co., 241 U.S. 190 (1916), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
241 U.S. 190
Georgia, Florida, & Alabama Railway Company v. Blish Milling Company
Argued: and Submitted March 15, 1916. --- Decided: May 8, 1916
Messrs. T. S. Hawes, Alexander Akerman, and Charles Akerman for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. A. L. Miller and E. M. Donalson for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from page 191 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Georgia: A Social-Democratic Peasant Republic

Original title: Georgien, eine Sozialdemokratische Bauernrepublik (1921)
GEORGIA
A SOCIAL-DEMOCRATIC PEASANT REPUBLIC
IMPRESSIONS AND OBSERVATIONS
BY
KARL KAUTSKY
(Translated by H. J. Stenning.)
INTERNATIONAL BOOKSHOPS, LIMITED LONDON: 10 JOHNSON’S COURT, FLEET STREET, E.C.4 BRADFORD: 103 KIRKGATE MANCHESTER: 24/26 NEW BROWN STREET
TWO SHILLINGS NET
page
GEORGIA
page
GEORGIA
A SOCIAL-DEMOCRATIC PEASANT REPUBLIC
IMPRESSIONS AND OBSERVATIONS
BY
KARL KAUTSKY
(Translated by H. J. Stenning and revised by the Author)
INTERNATIONAL BOOKSHOPS, LIMITED LONDON: 10 JOHNSON'S COURT, FLEET STREET, E.C.4 BRADFORD: 103 KIRKGATE MANCHESTER: 24/26 NEW BROWN STREET
page
CONTENTS
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Histories (Herodotus)

The Histories (also known as The History) of Herodotus, is now considered the founding work of history in Western literature. Written in the 450s BC in the Ionic dialect of classical Greek, The Histories serves as a record of the ancient traditions, politics, geography, and clashes of various cultures that were known in Western Asia, Northern Africa and Greece at that time. Although not a fully impartial record, it remains one of the West's most important sources regarding these affairs. Moreover, it established the genre and study of history in the Western world (despite the existence of historical records and chronicles beforehand).
English-language translations of Ιστορίαι include:
* The Persian Wars, translated by A. D. Godley
* The History of Herodotus, translated by George Rawlinson
* The History of Herodotus, translated by G. C. Macaulay
# History

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "History."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* The History, a history book by Herodotus
* History (1912), an article by Bernadotte Perrin
* "History" (1917, "A wind might blow a lotus petal"), a poem by William Carlos Williams

## See also

* Story
* Histories
* Ancient History
# Histories

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Histories."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Histories, by Tacitus
* Histories, by Herodotus
* The Histories, by Polybius

## See also

* History
# Histories (Godley translation)/Book 8
### 27

[4] So after the watch of the Thessalians saw them first, they were overcome with fear, because they thought it to be a sign of sorts, and after the watch the army itself was overcome with fear in the same way, so that the Phocians got possession of four thousand dead and shields; they dedicated half of which in Abae, and half in Delphi: [5] and a tenth of their loot from battle became the statues surrounding the tripod in front of the Delphian temple, and other such statues in Abae.

### 33

And going there from the river Cephisus, they kept on destroying everything, and they set fire to the city of Drymus, as well as Charadra, Erochus, Tethronius, Amphicaea, Neon, Pediae, Triteae, Elateia, Hyampolis, Parapotamioi and Abae, where the rich oracle of Apollo was, equipped with both treasures and a wealth of gifts; both then and now still there is an oracle there. And after they plundered it, they burnt it: and, chasing, they captured several of the Phocians, near the mountains, and killed some of the women because they violated them with many.

### 134

[1] This Mys, apparently, went to Lebadea, and bribed one of the men of the local people to go down to the oracle of Trophonius, and he went to Abae in Phocis, to the oracle; though first of all he went to Thebes, where he consulted with Apollo Ismenius - doing so there is exactly like in Olympia, which is by sacrifice - and after he bribed a stranger (and not a Theban) with money, this stranger laid down to sleep at the oracle of Amphiraus.
# Histories (Godley translation)/Book 7
#### 135

¹ Worthy of admiration was these men's deed of daring, and so also were their sayings. On their way to Susa, they came to Hydarnes, a Persian, who was general of the coast of Asia. He entertained and feasted them as his guests, and as they sat at his board, he asked: ² "Lacedaemonians, why do you shun the king's friendship? You can judge from what you see of me and my condition how well the king can honor men of worth. So might it be with you if you would but put yourselves in the king's hands, being as you are of proven worth in his eyes, and every one of you might by his commission be a ruler of Hellas." ³ To this the Spartans answered: "Your advice to u, Hydarnes, is not completely sound; one half of it rests on knowledge, but the other on ignorance. You know well how to be a slave, but you, who have never tasted freedom, do not know whether it is sweet or not. Were you to taste of it, not with spears you would counsel us to fight for it, no, but with axes."
# Histories (Tacitus)

"Histories" (Historiae) is a history, written c. 100–110, which originally covered the Year of Four Emperors in Rome following the downfall of Nero, the rise of Vespasian, and the rule of the Flavian Dynasty (69–96) up to the death of Domitian. In June 68, the emperor Nero was deposed in favour of the elderly general Galba, and committed suicide. Beginning in January 69, Tacitus tells the story of the Year of Four Emperors, as Galba was overthrown by Otho, Otho by Vitellius, and finally, Vitellius by Vespasian.
Of the approximately fourteen books originally included in the work, only five books survive. The later books, which originally covered the majority of Vespasian's reign and those of his sons Titus and Domitian, have not survived.
English-language translations of Historiae include:
* The Histories, translated (1876) by Alfred John Church and William Jackson Brodribb
* Tacitus, The Histories, translated (1912) by William Hamilton Fyfe
# From the Founding of the City/Book 20

translated by Daniel Spillan and Cyrus Edmonds, 1868
A colony settled at Spoletum. [Y.R. 512. B.C. 240.] An army sent against the Ligurians; being the first war with that state. The Sardinians and Corsicans rebel, and are subdued. [Y.R. 514. B.C. 238.] Tuccia, a vestal, found guilty of incest. War declared against the Illyrians, who had slain an ambassador; they are subdued and brought to submission. [Y.R. 515. B.C. 237.] The number of praetors increased to four. The Transalpine Gauls make an irruption into Italy: are conquered and put to the sword. [Y.R. 516. B.C. 236.] The Roman army, in conjunction with the Latins, is said to have amounted to no less than three hundred thousand men. [Y.R. 517. B.C. 235.] The Roman army for the first time crosses the Po; fights with and subdues the Insubrian Gauls. [Y.R. 530. B.C. 222.] Claudius Marcellus, consul, having slain Viridomarus, the general of the Insubrian Gauls, carries off the spolia opima. [Y.R. 531. B.C. 221.] The Istrians subdued; also the Illyrians, who had rebelled. [Y.R. 532. B.C. 220.] The censors hold a lustrum, in which the number of the citizens is found to be two hundred and seventy thousand two hundred and thirteen. The sons of freed-men formed into four tribes; the Esquiline, Palatine, Suburran, and Colline. [Y.R. 533. B.C. 219.] Caius Flaminius, censor, constructs the Flaminian road, and builds the Flaminian circus.
# Heal us, EMMANUEL, here we are

This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
JEHOVAH-ROPHI, I am the Lord that healeth thee by William Cowper
    Heal us, EMMANUEL, here we are,
    Waiting to feel thy touch;
    Deep wounded souls to thee repair,
    And, Savior we are such.
    Our faith is feeble we confess,
    We faintly trust thy word;
    But wilt thou pity us the less?
    Be that far from thee, Lord!
    Remember him who once applied
    With trembling for relief;
    "Lord, I believe, with tears he cried,
    O help my unbelief."
    She too, who touched thee in the press,
    And healing virtue stole;
    Was answered, "Daughter, go in peace,
    Thy faith hath made thee whole."
    Concealed amid the gath'ring throng,
    She would have shunned thy view;
    And if her faith was firm and strong,
    Had strong misgivings too.
    Like her, with hopes and fears, we come,
    To touch thee if we may;
    O! send us not despairing home,
    Send none unhealed away.
# Heald v. District of Columbia

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Heald v. District of Columbia."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Heald v. District of Columbia (254 U.S. 20)
* Heald v. District of Columbia (259 U.S. 114)
# Headquarters Dobb's Farm, 11th June, 1862

Robert E. Lee's order to JEB Stuart. Was written June 11, 1862.
   Headquarters Dobb's Farm, llth June, 1862
   General J. E. B. Stuart,
   Commanding Cavalry.
   General, — You are desired to make a scout movement to the rear of the enemy now posted on the Chickahominy, with a view of gaining intelligence of his operations, communications, etc., and of driving in his foraging parties and securing such grain, cattle, etc., for ourselves as you can make arrangements to have driven in. Another object is to destroy his wagon trains, said to be daily passing from the Piping-Tree Road to his camp on the Chickahominy. The utmost vigilance on your part will be necessary to prevent any surprise to yourself, and the greatest caution must be practised in keeping well in your front and flanks reliable scouts to give you information. You will return as soon as the object of your expedition is accomplished ; and you must bear constantly in mind, while endeavoring to execute the general purpose of your mission, not to hazard unnecessarily your command, or to attempt what your judgment may not approve; but be content to accomplish all the good you can, without feeling it necessary to obtain all that might be desired.
   I recommend that you take only such men and horses as can stand the expedition, and that you use every means in your power to save and cherish those you do take. You must leave sufficient cavalry here for the service of this army, and remember that one of the chief objects of your expedition is to gain intelligence for the guidance of future movements.
   Information received last evening, the points of which I sent you, leads me to infer that there is a stronger force on the enemy's right than was previously reported. A large body of infantry, as well as cavalry, was reported near the Central Railroad.
   Should you find, upon investigation, that the enemy is moving to his right, or is so strongly posted as to make your ex- pedition inopportune, you will, after gaining all the information you can, resume your former position.
   I am, with great respect, your obedient servant,
   R. E. Lee, General.

## References

* The life and campaigns of Major-General J.E.B. Stuart: commander of the cavalry of the Army of northern Virginia by McClellan, H. B. (Henry Brainerd), 1840-1904 P. 52