OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Italian Hours/Two Old Houses and Three Young Women, introduction

There are times and places that come back yet again, but that, when the brooding tourist puts out his hand to them, meet it a little slowly, or even seem to recede a step, as if in slight fear of some liberty he may take. Surely they should know by this time that he is capable of taking none. He has his own way--he makes it all right. It now becomes just a part of the charming solicitation that it presents precisely a problem--that of giving the particular thing as much as possible without at the same time giving it, as we say, away. There are considerations, proprieties, a necessary indirectness--he must use, in short, a little art. No necessity, however, more than this, makes him warm to his work, and thus it is that, after all, he hangs his three pictures.
# Italian Hours/Venice, introduction

It is a great pleasure to write the word; but I am not sure there is not a certain impudence in pretending to add anything to it. Venice has been painted and described many thousands of times, and of all the cities of the world is the easiest to visit without going there. Open the first book and you will find a rhapsody about it; step into the first picture-dealer's and you will find three or four high-coloured "views" of it. There is notoriously nothing more to be said on the subject. Every one has been there, and every one has brought back a collection of photographs. There is as little mystery about the Grand Canal as about our local thoroughfare, and the name of St. Mark is as familiar as the postman's ring. It is not forbidden, however, to speak of familiar things, and I hold that for the true Venice- lover Venice is always in order. There is nothing new to be said about her certainly, but the old is better than any novelty. It would be a sad day indeed when there should be something new to say. I write these lines with the full consciousness of having no information whatever to offer. I do not pretend to enlighten the reader; I pretend only to give a fillip to his memory; and I hold any writer sufficiently justified who is himself in love with his theme.
# In re Groban

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
352 U.S. 330
In re Groban
Argued: Nov. 6, 1956. --- Decided: Feb 25, 1957
Mr. James F. Graham, Zanesville, Ohio, for the appellants.
Messrs. Earl W. Allison, Jr. and J. Ralston Werum, Columbus, for the appellee.
Mr. Justice REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re Grossmayer

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
177 U.S. 48
In re Grossmayer
Argued: February 26, 1900. --- Decided: March 26, 1900
Messrs. Thomas H. Clark and L. E. Trezevant for petitioner.
Mr. William W. MacFarland for respondent.
Mr. Justice Gray delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re Haberman Manufacturing Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
147 U.S. 525
In re Haberman Manufacturing Company
W. H. Kenyon and C. E.
Mitchell, for petitioner.
Mr. Justice BLATCHFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re Hall

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
167 U.S. 38
In re Hall
Edwin Forrest, for petitioner.
Ass't Atty. Gen. Dodge, for respondent.
Mr. Justice PECKHAM delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In re Harris

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
221 U.S. 274
In re Harris
Argued: April 28, 1911. --- Decided: May 15, 1911
Messrs. Louis J. Vorhaus and Moses H. Grossman for Harris.
[Argument of Counsel from page 275 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Abram I. Elkus and Carlisle J. Gleason for the receiver.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 276-278 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# King John and the Bishop

English folk-song dating back at least to the 16th century. It is catalogued in Child Ballads as number 45 and Roud Folk Song Index 302. The narrative is part of a larger group of folklore narratives, classified as ATU 922 (The Shepherd Substituting for the Priest Answers the King's Questions (The King and the Abbot)).

## See also

* "King John and the Abbot of Canterbury", prose instance of the King and Abbot narrative, in More English Fairy Tales by Joseph Jacobs
* For more information on folk tales of type ATU 922, see King John and the Bishop on Wikipedia.
# King Lear (1917) Yale

* related portals: The Yale Shakespeare.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons gallery, Commons category, quotes, Wikidata item.
Part of The Yale Shakespeare series.
Layout 2
The Yale Shakespeare
THE CHRONICLE HISTORY OF THE LIFE AND DEATH OF
KING LEAR
AND HIS THREE DAUGHTERS
EDITED BY WILLIAM LYON PHELPS
NEW HAVEN · YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON · HUMPHREY MILFORD OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS · MCMXVII
Copyright, 1917 By Yale University Press
First published, October, 1917
Here Love the slain with Love the slayer lies; Deep drown'd are both in the same sunless pool. Up from its depths that mirror thundering skies Bubbles the wan mirth of the mirthless Fool.
—William Watson
TABLE OF CONTENTS :
| | PAGE |
| The Text | 1 |
| Act I | 1 |
| Act II | 36 |
| Act III | 61 |
| Act IV | 85 |
| Act V | 113 |
| Notes | 131 |
| Appendix A. Sources of the Play | 138 |
| Appendix B. History of the Play | 143 |
| Appendix C. Text of the Present Edition | 146 |
| Appendix D. Suggestions for Collateral Reading | 147 |
| Index of Words Glossed | 148 |
The facsimile opposite represents the title-page of the Elizabethan Club copy of the spurious "1608" quarto. Though purporting to belong to that year, this edition is now known to be an interesting forgery, executed about 1619. A discussion of the relation between this and the genuine 1608 quarto, together with the imprint of the latter, will be found on p. 143. Of the spurious edition, some twenty-eight copies, are known to survive; of the genuine, ten.
THE YALE SHAKESPEARE
Edited by
Wilbur L. CrossTucker Brooke
Willard Higley Durham
Published under the Direction
of the
Department of English, Yale University,
on the Fund
Given to the Yale University Press in 1917
by the Members of the
Kingsley Trust Association
To Commemorate the Seventy-Fifth Anniversary
of the Founding of the Society
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1943, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 80 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# King James Version

   The King James Version (KJV), also known as the Authorized Version (AV) or King James Bible (KJB), is an English translation of the Christian Bible for the Church of England that began in 1604 and was completed in 1611. [...] The translation was done by 47 scholars, all of whom were members of the Church of England. [...] With the development of stereotype printing at the beginning of the 19th century, this version of the Bible became the most widely printed book in history, almost all such printings presenting the standard text of 1769 extensively re-edited by Benjamin Blayney at Oxford; and nearly always omitting the books of the Apocrypha. Today the unqualified title 'King James Version' commonly identifies this Oxford standard text.
   —Excerpted from King James Version on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
* The Holy Bible, first published edition, 1611. (incomplete)
* The King James Bible, Oxford standard text, ed. Benjamin Blayney, 1769. Transcluded. Full text added except index. Not proofread. Includes inter-testament books.
* The Holy Bible, tercentenary printing with illustrations but without chapter and verse numbering, 1911. (incomplete)

## See also

* Webster's Revision of the King James Version, 1833.
# King John

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "King John."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* The Life and Death of King John, a play by William Shakespeare (1590s)
* The Troublesome Reign of King John, a play by an unknown author (1591)
* "King John," by William Hazlitt in Characters of Shakespear's Plays (1817)
* King John, a poem by Lydia Huntley Sigourney (1834)

## See also

* John of England (1166–1216)
* John
* King John and the Bishop
# King John (Shakespeare)

* related portals: Elizabethan drama.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, quotes, Wikidata item.
A historical play, believed to have been written in the 1590s.
* The life and death of King Iohn, from a facsimile copy of the First Folio (1623) (transcription project)
* The Life and Death of King John, from The Plays of William Shakespeare, in eight volumes, vol. III, with notes by Samuel Johnson (1765) IA
* King John, edited by G. C. Moore Smith, The Warwick Shakespeare (1900) IA
* The Life and Death of King John, in The Complete Works of William Shakespeare, Vol. IV, Oxford edition (1911) IA
* The Life and Death of King John, edited by Ivor B. John, The Works of Shakespeare, The Arden Shakespeare, 1st ser. (1907) IA
* The Life and Death of King John, edited by Stanley T. Williams, The Yale Shakespeare (1927)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago. Translations or editions published later may be copyrighted.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# King Lear

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "King Lear."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* The Tragedy of King Lear, a play by William Shakespeare
* The History of King Lear, an adaptation of Shakespeare's play by Nahum Tate (1681)
* "King Lear," in Tales from Shakspeare, by Charles and Mary Lamb
* "Lear," by William Hazlitt in Characters of Shakespear's Plays (1817)
* "King Lear," in The New Student's Reference Work, Chicago: F.E. Compton and Co. (1914)
# King Lear (1917) Yale/Appendix C

Layout 2
APPENDIX C
The Text of This Edition
In accordance with the plan of this series, and by permission of the Oxford Press, this text of King Lear is a reprint of Craig's Oxford Shakespeare, with the following changes, made after a comparison of Craig's text with the First Folio and Quarto texts:
(a) Extensive additions to the First Folio text are indicated by brackets.
(b) I have followed the stage directions of the First Folio, wherever practicable, necessary additional directions being enclosed in brackets.
(c) Minor changes have been made as follows:
II. ii. 36 whoreson, cullionly barber-monger instead of whoreson, cullionly, barber-monger
III. ii. 14 Spit fire! spout rain! instead of Spit, fire! spout, rain!
III. v. 22 fully.— I instead of fully.I
IV. i. 77 bear instead of bear;
IV. v. 25 œillades instead of œilliades
IV. vi. 139 naught instead of nought
V. iii. 24 good years instead of goujeres
V. iii. 184 burst! instead of burst,
Villainy, villainous instead of villany, villanous (passim)
# International Terminal Operating Company v. Nv Nederl Amerik Stoomv Maats/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 74
International Terminal Operating Company v. Nv Nederl Amerik Stoomv Maats
Argued: Oct. 21, 1968. ---
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
The respondent, a shipowner, sought indemnity from the petitioner, a stevedoring company, for damages the shipowner had paid to an employee of the stevedore who was injured while working aboard the respondent's ship. See Albanese v. N.V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats., 382 U.S. 283, 86 S.Ct. 429, 15 L.Ed.2d 327 (1965). A jury found that the stevedoring company had fulfilled its duty of workmanlike service and, accordingly, that no indemnity was due. See Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic S.S.C.orp., 350 U.S. 124, 76 S.Ct. 232, 100 L.Ed. 133 (1956). The Court of Appeals reversed this verdict and held, as a matter of law, that the stevedore had not taken reasonable action to avert the injury. 392 F.2d 763 (1968).
The cause of the longshoreman's injury was carbon monoxide inhalation that occurred as he and other longshoremen were using gasoline-powered vehicles to move cargo in the ship's lower hold. The shipowner contends that the stevedore's hatch boss acted unreasonably. When longshoremen complained about the lack of ventilation in the hold, the hatch boss informed one of the ship's officers that his men would walk off the job unless the officer turned on the ship's ventilating system. The officer told the men to continue working and promised to activate the ventilating system, which was within the shipowner's exclusive control and which was concededly adequate to ventilate the hold. When, less than 10 minutes later, the hatch boss realized that the ventilating system had not been turned on, he ordered the men from the hold. The injured longshoreman collapsed as he was ascending a ladder to leave.
The Court of Appeals said that the hatch boss should have ceased work when he first learned that the ship's ventilating system was not operating, despite the officer's promise to turn on the system. Alternatively, he should have used the stevedore's blowers, which had been left on the pier, to ventilate the hold. The jury, however, in response to a special interrogatory, found that the stevedore had acted reasonably in continuing to work for a brief period in reliance on the officer's promise. We cannot agree with the Court of Appeals that the stevedore acted unreasonably as a matter of law. Under the Seventh Amendment, that issue should have been left to the jury's determination. Any other ruling would be inconsistent with this Court's decision in Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd., 369 U.S. 355, 82 S.Ct. 780, 7 L.Ed.2d 798 (1962).
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
Reversed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# International Stevedoring Company v. Haverty

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
272 U.S. 50
International Stevedoring Company v. Haverty
Argued: Oct. 5, 6, 1926. --- Decided: Oct 18, 1926
Mr. Stephen V. Carey, of Seattle, Wash., for petitioner.
Messrs. Mark M. Litchman and John F. Dore, both of Seattle, Wash., for respondent.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# International Text-Book Company v. Carl Peterson International Text-Book Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
218 U.S. 664
International Text-Book Company v. Carl Peterson International Text-Book Company
Mr. David C. Harrington for plaintiff in error.
No briefs filed for defendants in error.
Per Curiam: Substantially the same question of Federal law involved in these two cases arose under a Kansas statute in International Text-Book Co. v. Pigg, 217 U.S. 91, 54 L. ed. 678, 27 L.R.A.(N.S.) 493, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 481; and the Federal right asserted in that case was sustained. There is no difference in principle between the two cases last named and the Pigg Case, although the Federal question involved in them arises under the statutes, respectively, of other states,-Wisconsin and Vermont. In view of the pleadings and the conceded facts in these cases, the judgment in each of them must be reversed on the authority of the Pigg Case, and the cases are severally remanded for such further proceedings as is required by, and is not inconsistent with, this opinion. It is so ordered.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# International Text-Book Company v. Carl Peterson International Text-Book Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
218 U.S. 664
International Text-Book Company v. Carl Peterson International Text-Book Company

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# International Text-Book Company v. Pigg

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
217 U.S. 91
International Text-Book Company v. Pigg
Argued: April 21, 1909. --- Decided: April 4, 1910
Messrs. James M. Beck, Seth T. McCormick, and David C. Harrington for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 92-99 intentionally omitted]
No appearance for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Journal of Discourses/Volume 25

Journal of Discourses Volume 25
BY: PRESIDENT JOHN TAYLOR,
HIS COUNSELLORS, THE TWELVE APOSTLES, AND OTHERS
Reported By GEO. F. GIBBS, JOHN IRVINE AND OTHERS.
Respectfully Dedicated to the Latter-Day Saints in All the World
VOL. XXV.
ENTERED AT STATIONERS' HALL. LIVERPOOL:
PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY JOHN HENRY SMITH, 42, ISLINGTON. LONDON:
LATTER-DAY SAINTS' BOOK DEPOT, 19, SUTHERLAND STREET PIMLIGO LONDON, S. W.
1884.
Preface
In presenting this TWENTY-FIFTH Volume of the Journal of Discourses to our readers, we express the hope that they may be inspired by the same spirit in perusing those discourses, that our brethren enjoyed in delivering them, and that the fruits may be seen in increased diligence and faith in the lives of the Latter-day Saints.
THE PUBLISHER.
# Lancashire Legends, Traditions, Pageants, Sports, &c./Part 2/Rushbearings

Part II: Pageants, Maskings, and Mummings; Rushbearings.
RUSH-BEARINGS.
The ancient custom of strewing church-floors with rushes, which were renewed every year on the day of the dedication of the church, seems to have been practised in times before the floors were flagged, to cover the soil or mud of the floors, and to give warmth in winter, and a sort of cleanliness in summer. In the parish register of Kirkham are entries to this effect:—"1604. Rushes to strew the church cost this year 9s. 6d." "1631. Paid for carrying the rushes out of the church in the sickness time, 5s." In Thomas Newton's "Herbal to the Bible," 1587, it is stated that "with sedge and rushes many in the country do use in summer-time to strew their parlours and churches, as well for coolness as for pleasant smell." Brand adds—"As our ancestors rarely washed their floors, disguises of uncleanliness became very necessary." It may be noted that disbursements for ​rushes never appear in the Kirkham register after 1634, when the church was flagged for the first time. The custom was, however, observed till of late years in Penwortham Church. The festival of rush-bearing does not always, however, coincide with the feast of the dedication. At Altcar the church is dedicated to St Michael (Sept. 29), yet the rush-bearing is celebrated in July. Mr Roby speaks of it as an unmeaning pageant still practised in the northern and eastern parts of Lancashire, for the purpose of levying contributions. The rush-cart, preceded by a large silk banner, and decorated with flowers, ribbons, &c., is drawn round to the dwellings of the principal inhabitants by morrice-dancers, who perform an uncouth dance, one of the mummers being a man in motley attire, a sort of compound of the ancient fool and of Maid Marion; who jingles a horse-collar hung with bells, and makes jokes with the bystanders. The rush-bearing is still kept up with much ceremony at Ambleside.
# Lancashire Legends, Traditions, Pageants, Sports, &c./Part 2/Whalley Rushbearing

Part II: Pageants, Maskings, and Mummings; Whalley Rushbearing.
WHALLEY RUSH-BEARING.
Dr Whitaker, in his history of the parish, says this was a high festival at Whalley. In the old churchwardens' accounts there are annual charges for dressing and cleaning the church, churchyard, &c., for this occasion. It is curious, however, to observe that even in 1617 the old festivals were beginning to decline. The ​"Journal" says "much less solemnity than formerly." Canon Raines adds:—It was specially provided in the "Book of Sports" that women should have leave to carry rushes to the church for the decoration of the same according to their ancient custom. The old churchwardens' accounts have entirely perished from carelessness; but in those after 1700 laudable attention appears to have been paid to the cleansing of the church, and there are regular entries every year as follows:—"Paid for dressing the church against St James's Day, five shillings." The rushes were brought on the rush-cart by the north gate into the church free of expense. Garlands were suspended in the church and on the top of the steeple. It is about seventy years since the floor of Whalley Church was strewed with rushes; and after the occasion for its use ceased, the rush-cart door disappeared, though the festival itself was kept up, and the morris-dancers played their parts in it for more than seventy years afterwards. For fifty years, on the 5th August, the village was crowded like a fair, booths were erected, and horse-races and other rustic sports attracted numbers of people from the surrounding country. But the festival gradually declined, and within the last two years [before 1848] St James's Day, the rush-cart, and the festival, have altogether ceased in Whalley. St James's Day, old style, would be on the 6th August, and the rush-bearing day, the 5th August, would therefore be the Eve of St James'.