OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States v. Weissman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
266 U.S. 377
United States v. Weissman
Argued: and Submitted Dec. 5, 1924. --- Decided: Dec 15, 1924
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Donovan, for the United States.
Mr. Benjamin Slade, of New York City, for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Welden

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinions

    Black
    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
377 U.S. 95
United States v. Welden
Argued: Feb. 27, 1964. --- Decided: April 20, 1964
Irwin A. Seibel, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
George H. Lewald, Boston, Mass., for appellee.
Mr. Justice GOLDBERG delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Buchanan

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Buchanan."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Buchanan (49 U.S. 83)
* United States v. Buchanan (232 U.S. 72)
See also Buchanan v. United States.
# United States v. Bryan and Woodcock/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
The United States claim a priority in payment out of the estate of Hendrickson in the hands of the Defendants. Hendrickson, it appears, was one of the sureties of George Bush, late collector at Wilmington, who died on the 2d of February, 1797, in debt to the United States, as appears by a subsequent adjustment of his accounts at the treasury in the sum of 3,453 dollars and 6 cents. By the 5th section of the act of the 3d of March, 1797, under which this priority is claimed, it is declared that where any revenue officer, or other person, hereafter becoming indebted to the United States by bond or otherwise, shall become insolvent, &c. the debt due to the United States shall be first satisfied.
The Court is of opinion that Hendrickson was indebted to the United States before this act passed, that is, at the time of the death of the collector, although the accounts of the latter were not settled until after its passage; and that, therefore, the law which secures a priority against the estates of persons who shall thereafter become indebted, does not apply to this case. The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Bryan

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Jackson

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
339 U.S. 323
United States v. Bryan
Argued: Dec. 15, 1949. --- Decided: May 8, 1950
See 339 U.S. 991, 70 S.Ct. 1018.
Mr. Philip B. Perlman, Sol. Gen., Washington, D.C., for the United states.
Messrs. O. John Rogge, Washington, D.C., and Benedict Wolf, New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Chief Justice VINSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Bryant

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
111 U.S. 499
United States v. Bryant
Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for plaintiff in error.
No appearance for defendants in error.
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hill v. Harding (130 U.S. 699)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
130 U.S. 699
Hill v. Harding
[Statement of Case from pages 699-701 intentionally omitted]
George W. Brandt, for plaintiff in error.
John M. Glover, for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice GRAY, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hill v. Martin Dorrance

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
296 U.S. 393
Hill v. Martin Dorrance
Argued: Nov. 11, 12, 1935. --- Decided: Dec 16, 1935
Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.
Mr. Wm. A. Schnader, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.
Messrs. Duane E. Minard and Geo. S. Hobart, both of Newark, N.J., for appellee.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hill v. Hawes

United States Supreme Court
320 U.S. 520
Hill v. Hawes
Argued: Dec. 6, 1943. --- Decided: Jan 3, 1944
See 321 U.S. 801, 64 S.Ct. 515.
Mr. Henry L. Johnson, Jr., of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. John B. Gunion, of Washington, D.C., for respondents.
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ft. Smith Spelter Company v. Clear Creek Oil & Gas Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
267 U.S. 231
Ft. Smith Spelter Company v. Clear Creek Oil & Gas Company
Argued: Jan. 28, 1925. --- Decided: March 2, 1925
Messrs. Tom M. Mehaffy and J. W. Mehaffy, both of Little Rock, Ark., and James S. Holt, of Ft. Smith, Ark., for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. J. M. Hill and H. L. Fitzhugh, both of Ft. Smith, Ark., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fuentes v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
63 U.S. 443
Fuentes v. United States

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hammer v. Garfield Mining Milling Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
130 U.S. 291
Hammer v. Garfield Mining Milling Company
E. W. Toole and J. K. Toole, for plaintiff in error.
Eppa Hunton, for defendant in error.
FIELD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hammer v. Dagenhart

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Hammer v. Dagenhart, 247 U.S. 251 (1918), was a United States Supreme Court decision involving the power of Congress to enact child labor laws. Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Holmes

## Linked case(s)

312 U.S. 100
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
247 U.S. 251
Hammer v. Dagenhart
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
The Act of September 1, 1916, c. 432, 39 Stat. 675, prohibits transportation in interstate commerce of goods made at a factory in which, within thirty days prior to their removal therefrom, children under the age of 14 years have been employed or permitted to work, or children between the ages of 14 and 16 years have been employed or permitted to work more than eight hours in any day, or more than six days in any week, or after the hour of 7 P.M. or before the hour of 6 A.M. Held, unconstitutional as exceeding the commerce power of Congress and invading the powers reserved to the States.
The power to regulate interstate commerce is the power to prescribe the rule by which the commerce is to be governed; in other words, to control the means by which it is carried on.
The court has never sustained a right to exclude save in cases where the character of the particular things excluded was such as to bring them peculiarly within the governmental authority of the State or Nation and render their exclusion, in effect, but a regulation of interstate transportation, necessary to prevent the accomplishment through that means of the evils inherent in them.
The manufacture of goods is not commerce, nor do the facts that they are intended for, and are afterwards shipped in, interstate commerce make their production a part of that commerce subject to the control of Congress.
The power to regulate interstate commerce was not intended as a means of enabling Congress to equalize the economic conditions in the States for the prevention of unfair competition among them by forbidding the interstate transportation of goods made under conditions which Congress deems productive of unfairness.
It was not intended as an authority to Congress to control the States in the exercise of their police power over local trade and manufacture, always existing and expressly reserved to them by the Tenth Amendment. [p252]
The case is stated in the opinion. [p268]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hammer v. Township of Livingston

* related portals: New Jersey case law.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLATE DIVISION
318 N.J. Super. 298; 723 A.2d 988
SUSAN HAMMER AND ALAN HAMMER, HER HUSBAND, PLAIN-TIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON AND CRAIG D. DUFFORD, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County.
No. A-3593-97T1 Argued: December 8, 1998 --- Decided: February 18, 1999 --- Approved for Publication February 18, 1999.
Stephen S. Weinstein, argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Weinstein, attorney; Gail S. Boertzel, of counsel and on the brief).
Thomas D. Robertson, argued the cause for respondents (McCarter & English, attorneys; James H. Keale, of counsel; Christopher R. Carton, on the brief).
Before Judges MUIR, Jr., EICHEN and COBURN. The opinion of the court was delivered by EICHEN, J.A.D.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hammer v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
271 U.S. 620
Hammer v. United States
Argued: May 5, 1926. --- Decided: June 7, 1926
Mr. Robert H. Elder, of New York City, for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 620-622 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Gardner P. Lloyd, of New York City, for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from page 623 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hammerschmidt v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
265 U.S. 182
Hammerschmidt v. United States
Argued: April 29 and 30, 1924. --- Decided: May 26, 1924
Messrs. Ed. F. Alexander, of Cincinnati, Ohio, and Joseph W. Sharts, of Dayton, Ohio, for petitioners.
The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Davis, for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 183-184 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Holger Danske

English-language translations of Holger Danske include:
* "Holger Danske" in Hans Andersen's Fairy Tales (1888), translated by Mrs. Henry H. B. Paull
* "Holger Danske" in The Fairy Tales of Hans Christian Andersen (1899), translated by Mary Howitt, illustrated by Helen Stratton
# Holgate v. Eaton

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
116 U.S. 33
Holgate v. Eaton
Argued: December 14, 1885. ---
W. C. Holgate and H. Newton, for appellants, William C. Holgate and another.
Jas. S. Hoyt and H. S. Sherman, for appellee, Rufus J. Eaton, Adm'r, etc.
MILLER, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Holiday Magic, Inc. v. Warren

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Holiday Magic, Inc. v. Warren."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Holiday Magic, Inc. v. Warren (357 F.Supp. 20)
* Holiday Magic, Inc. v. Warren (497 F.2d 687)
# Holding v. Blankenship/Concurrence Harlan

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Harlan
United States Supreme Court
387 U.S. 94
Holding v. Blankenship
Mr. Justice HARLAN concurs in the denial of certiorari as to Question 2, but would affirm the judgment of the District Court as to Question 1.
Mr. Justice WHITE would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Holding v. Blankenship/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Harlan
United States Supreme Court
387 U.S. 94
Holding v. Blankenship
Probable jurisdiction noted as to question 1. The judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma entered November 4, 1966, is reversed insofar as it adjudged provisions of §§ 1040.1 to 1040.10 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes to be constitutional. Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58, 83 S.Ct. 631, 9 L.Ed.2d 584. Treating the nonappealable issue presented by Question 2 as if contained in a petition for a writ of certiorari, the petition is denied. See Mishkin v. State of New York, 383 U.S. 502, 512, 86 S.Ct. 958, 965, 16 L.Ed.2d 56.
Reversed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Honoring the Jenkintown Library on its 200th Anniversary

Source: 2003 Congressional Record, Vol. 149, Page E631
Honoring the Jenkintown Library on its 200th Anniversary
HON. JOSEPH M. HOEFFEL
OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Tuesday, April 1, 2003
Mr. HOEFFEL. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize and honor the Jenkintown Library on its 200th anniversary.
Established in 1803, the Jenkintown Library is now the third oldest library in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. For two centuries it has been a center for community learning and is still satisfying the changing needs of the area. The library's vast collection contains books, periodicals, DVD's, and other forms of multimedia. The library also offers programs that reflect the diverse interests of the community it serves.
It is fitting that the Jenkintown Library is celebrating its bicentennial next week, as it corresponds with National Library week. National Library week is a time to recognize and highlight the contributions of both libraries and librarians for connecting people with the resources that they need to live and to learn. It also recognizes libraries as a place for education, self-help, and opportunity, something that the Jenkintown Library exemplifies.
Two hundred years after its founding, the Jenkintown Library still retains its architectural beauty and has been on the National Register of Historic Places since 1979. Throughout its long history, the library has been able to keep up with the needs of the community, and I am confident that the library will continue to contribute for many years to come. I am grateful for the service that the library has provided to not only the citizens of Jenkintown but to all Montgomery Countians.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Honoring the Life and Legacy of Ronald Rogers

Delivered on the floor of the United States House of Representatives on December 9, 2020
Mr. Speaker, I rise today to celebrate the life and legacy of Mr. Ronald Rogers. Ron dedicated his life to public service and to creating opportunities for young people.
Ron was a proud member of the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc. and a graduate of Florida A&M University. But above all, he was a proud graduate of Jones High School, and he loved the students with all of his heart and soul.
As founder and president of the Orlando chapter of 100 Black Men of America, he worked hard to mentor students and provide scholarships and other resources to help them during their college years.
Ron also served in numerous leadership roles, including as city administrator for the historic town of Eatonville, where his vision for Eatonville helped pave the way for the town's success today.
Ron never stopped, paused, or exhaled. He had an unwavering sense of urgency about serving his community, about making his community better.
Ron Rogers truly made a difference in the lives of others, and we are so grateful for a life well-lived.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Honoring the Life of Colonel Owen A. Heeter of Rochester, Indiana

Honoring the Life of Colonel Owen A. Heeter of Rochester, Indiana. Congressional Record. June 11, 2007. Extensions of Remarks. Page E1254-E1255. DOCID:cr11jn07-97. (available online)
Mr. DONNELLY. Madam Speaker, today I rise to honor the life of COL Owen A. Heeter, who faithfully served our country in the United States Air Force for 30 years. Colonel Heeter passed away on February 17, 2007.
Colonel Heeter was born in Athens, Indiana in 1936. He graduated from Rochester High School in 1954 as an accomplished athlete and went on to attend DePauw University in Greencastle, Indiana. At DePauw, Colonel Heeter played baseball and was a member of Phi Gamma Delta Fraternity. However, it was his experiences in the Reserve Officers Training Corps that led him to a career dedicated to serving our country.
After graduation in 1958, Colonel Heeter joined the United States Air Force, becoming one of our country's most successful pilots. He was stationed at various bases within the United States and overseas, including Spain, Thailand, and Panama. Some of his most notable accomplishments include becoming the first pilot to fly an HH-53 helicopter across the Pacific Ocean, flying rescue missions over Vietnam, and recovering bodies from the mass suicide in Jonestown, Guyana.
Colonel Heeter received numerous awards in recognition of his outstanding service during his tours of duty. Included in these are the Bronze Star, the Silver Star, the Legion of Merit, the Distinguished Flying Cross, the Defense Meritorious Service Medal, the Meritorious Service Medal with Four Oak Leaf Clusters, the Air Medal with Four Oak Leaf Clusters, and the Air Force Commendation Medal.
After retiring from the Air Force, Colonel Heeter was a member of the international sales department at Bell Helicopter in Fort Worth, Texas. After retiring 10 years later, he returned to Rochester, Indiana, eventually marrying his high school sweetheart. In the last decade of his life, Colonel Heeter was an active member of Grace United Methodist Church, the Kiwanis Club, the LeRoy Shelton American Legion Post #36, and many other organizations. He enjoyed working on his golf game and spending time with his grandchildren.
Colonel Heeter represented the best that this country has to offer. His selfless dedication to the United States, to his community and to his family will always be remembered. It is with great pride that I celebrate the life and service of COL Owen A. Heeter.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Honoring the National Guard's Service in Winning the War on Terror

2004 Congressional Record, Vol. 150, Page E1636{{{3}}} : September 15, 2004 (Extensions of Remarks) From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:cr15se04-60]
HONORING THE NATIONAL GUARD'S SERVICE IN WINNING THE WAR ON TERROR
 ______  
 HON. JOE WILSON
 of south carolina
 in the house of representatives
 Wednesday, September 15, 2004
 Mr. WILSON of South Carolina. Mr. Speaker, yesterday President George
W. Bush praised the valor of guardsmen and reservists fighting to win
the War on Terror. President Bush is the 19th former guardsman to be
president and he rightly pointed out that the National Guard is
America's oldest fighting force. The Guard has played a vital role in
all of our major conflicts, and especially in recent decades fighting
in Vietnam, the Gulf War, and the War on Terror.  The Guard is also called on in times of national emergency to provide
invaluable support to local authorities. After the attacks of September
11th, thousands of Guardsmen across the country voluntarily stepped
forward to help. When hurricanes strike our shores, it is the Guard
that provides necessary communications and rescue services.  As a proud 31-year veteran of the South Carolina Army National Guard,
with two sons in the Guard one of whom is serving in Iraq, I ask all of
my colleagues to join me in thanking all of the men and women serving
in the Guard and Reserves today for protecting American families in the
War on Terror.  In conclusion, may God bless our troops and we will never forget
September 11th.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse