OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Collier's New Encyclopedia (1921)/Natal

Edition of 1921; disclaimer.
​NATAL, a British colony on the S. E. coast of Africa, one of the original provinces of the Union of South Africa. It is bounded by the Transvaal province, Portuguese East Africa, the Indian Ocean, Cape of Good Hope province, Basutoland, and the Orange Free State province; area, est. 35,019 square miles; pop. about 1,250,000. The only spot where sheltered anchorage can be obtained is at Port Natal, a fine circular bay near the center of the coast (see Durban). The surface is finely diversified, rising by successive terraces from the shore toward the lofty mountains on its W. frontiers. The chief summits are Champagne Castle, 10,357 feet; Mont aux Sources, about 10,000 feet; and Giant's Castle, 9,657. The mineral productions are principally coal, ironstone, limestone, and marble; gold has also been found in various localities. The province is well watered, but none of its rivers are navigable. The most important rivers are the Tugela, Umvoti, Umgeni, Umkomaas, and Umzimkulu. The climate on the whole is extremely salubrious. There are large forests on the W. and N. frontiers. The soil is generally rich and strong. On the higher forest and table-land cattle thrive well; and in the interior wheat, corn, barley, oats, maize, beans, and vegetables of almost every description have been largely and successfully grown. Corn is the chief agricultural product. There is a considerable trade. The exports and imports are valued at about $100,000,000. In some regions tobacco, indigo, sugarcane, and coffee grow well. The hippopotamus still has his haunts in several of the rivers, and there are numbers of small crocodiles. The birds comprise the vulture, several varieties of eagle, the secretary-bird, wild turkey, etc. Natal was discovered on Christmas Day, 1497, by Vasco da Gama, a Portuguese, and named by him “Terra Natalis.” The first settlers were the Dutch Boers, who left Cape Colony in 1836, and in 1839 removed to Port Natal and proclaimed themselves an independent republic. The establishment of a hostile settlement at the only port between Algoa and Delagoa Bays was incompatible with British interests, and in 1845 Natal, after a formidable resistance by the Boers, was proclaimed a British possession. In 1856 it was separated from Cape Colony and made a separate colony.
The province of Zululand was annexed to Natal, Dec. 30, 1897, and in 1903 several districts formerly belonging to the Transvaal were also annexed. In 1910 it became the original province of the Union of South Africa. There is a governor appointed by the British crown, a Ministry of five members, a legislative council of 25 members. Religion is well provided for by denominational bodies. Provision is made for education for both whites and natives. The capital is Pietermaritzburg; pop. (1918) 34,645.
# Collier's New Encyclopedia (1921)/Mérimée, Prosper

Edition of 1921; disclaimer.
​MÉRIMÉE, PROSPER (mā-rē-mā′), a French author; born in Paris, France, Sept, 28, 1803. He studied law, but never practiced; was senator in 1853. His best known works were the two novels, "Colomba" (1830), treating of the Corsican vendetta; and "Carmen" (1840), which furnished the plot of Bizet's opera of the same name. He wrote besides: "Plays of Clara Gazul" (1825); "Historic Monuments" (1843); "Historic and Literary Medleys" (1855), a collection of comedies in the style of the Spanish "intermezzo"; "Guzla" (1827), a collection of Illyrian lyrics; "Mateo Falconne," a novel; "Letters to an Unknown" ("Letters à Une Inconnue"; 1873); etc. He died in Cannes, France, Sept. 23, 1870.
# Collier's New Encyclopedia (1921)/Mühlhausen

Edition of 1921; disclaimer.
MÜHLHAUSEN (mül'hou-zen), a town of Prussian Saxony, on the Unstrut, 25 miles N. N. W. of Gotha; is an active center of commerce, and has manufactures of woolen and cotton goods, hosiery, etc. An important imperial free city even in the 13th century, it came to Prussia in 1802, to Westphalia in 1807, and again to Prussia in 1815. Pop. about 35,000.
# Chamberlain Mach Works v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
270 U.S. 347
Chamberlain Mach Works v. United States
Argued: Jan. 12 and 13, 1926. --- Decided: March 1, 1926
Mr. Raymond M. Hudson, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Donovan, for the United States.
Mr. Justice SANFORD delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chamberlin v. Dade County Board of Public Instruction

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
377 U.S. 402
Chamberlin v. Dade County Board of Public Instruction
Argued: June 1, 1964. --- Decided: Oct 12, 1964
See 85 S.Ct. 18.
Leo Pfeffer and Howard W. Dixon, for appellants.
George C. Bolles, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chamberlain Mach Works v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
270 U.S. 347
Chamberlain Mach Works v. United States
Argued: Jan. 12 and 13, 1926. --- Decided: March 1, 1926
The Chamberlain Machine Works filed its petition in the Court of Claims to recover compensation for the partial performance of a war contract for the machining of steel shells, which had been canceled by the United States before completion, pursuant to the terms of the contract. The petition was dismissed on demurrer, without opinion. 59 Ct. Cl. 972. The appeal was allowed in June, 1924.
The petition and an exhibit thereto disclosed that the claim was originally prosecuted in the War Department under the Dent Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 3115 14/15 a-3115 14/15 e), in various proceedings before the Ordinance Section of the Claims Board, the Board of Contract Adjustment, and the Appeal Section of the Claims Board, and that the Secretary of War made an award to the petitioner of $41,300.05, 'in full adjustment, payment, and discharge' of the contract, which was accepted by the petitioner, in writing, in 'full satisfaction of any and all claims or demands' which it had or might have pertaining to, growing out of, or incident to the contract.
The petition sought to recover on the original contract, despite the settlement made more than three years before. It alleged, broadly, that this settlement was iniquitous and unjust, and not the voluntary act of the petitioner, but was secured by 'fraud' of the officers of the War Department in the handling of the claim, by 'continued brow-beating,' and by 'coercion' through which they 'literally forced' the petitioner to take the sum offered.
The general allegations of 'fraud' and 'coercion' were mere conclusions of the pleader, and were not admitted by the demurrer. Fogg v. Blair, 11 S.C.t. 476, 139 U.S. 118, 127, 35 L. Ed. 104. To show a cause of action it was necessary that the petition state distinctly the particular acts of fraud and coercion relied on, specifying by whom and in what manner they were perpetrated, with such definiteness and reasonable certainty that the court might see that, if proved, they would warrant the setting aside of the settlement. See Stearns v. Page, 7 How. 819, 829, 12 L. Ed. 928; Perkins-Campbell Co. v. United States, 44 S.C.t. 237, 264 U.S. 213, 218, 68 L. Ed. 643; Cairo Railroad v. United States, 45 S.C.t. 247, 267 U.S. 350, 352, 69 L. Ed. 651. The petition contained no such specific allegations, and since its vague and general averments did not overcome the effect of the release, the demurrer was properly sustained. See St. Louis Railroad v. United States, 45 S.C.t. 245, 267 U.S. 346, 350, 69 L. Ed. 649.
Affirmed.

## Notes

* ↑ 6 Dec. War Dept. 242.
* ↑ 8 Dec. War Dept. 298.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Clarke v. Haberle Crystal Springs Brewing Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
280 U.S. 384
Clarke v. Haberle Crystal Springs Brewing Company
Argued: Jan. 9, 1930. --- Decided: Jan 27, 1930
The Attorney General and Mr. G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Mr. Arthur A. Ballantine, of New York City, for respondent.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Clark v. Williard (294 U.S. 211)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
294 U.S. 211
Clark v. Williard
Argued: Jan. 11, 1935. --- Decided: Feb 4, 1935
Messrs. Edmond M. Cook and Reuel B. Cook, both of Davenport, Iowa, for petitioner.
Mr. H. Leonard De Kalb, of Lewistown, Mont., for respondent.
Mr. Justice CARDOZO delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Clarke v. American Commerce National Bank (977 F.2d 1533)

1
Robert L. CLARKE, Comptroller of the Currency, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
AMERICAN COMMERCE NATIONAL BANK, Defendant-Appellent.
No. 91-56327.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 28, 1992.
Before: PREGERSON, D.W. NELSON, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
In light of the petition for rehearing filed by American Commerce National Bank (ACNB), we have reconsidered twelve attorney billing statements to determine whether they fall within the attorney-client privilege as outlined in our previous decision in this case. See Clarke v. American Commerce National Bank, 974 F.2d 127 (9th Cir.1992). We agree with ACNB that these bills contain information which, if disclosed, would reveal litigation strategy.
Accordingly, it is ordered that specific portions of these bills, as indicated by ACNB, are to be redacted before they are handed over to the Comptroller of the Currency. For this purpose, we have indicated on copies of the bills that will be returned to the district court those items to be redacted. The bills to be redacted are numbered: B000092–98, B000109–11, B000152, B000164.
With this order, the petition for rehearing is denied.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Clarke v. Boorman's Executors/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
85 U.S. 493
Clarke v. Boorman's Executors

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Chronological Table and Index of the Statutes/Chronological Table/Hen3

CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE, ARRANGED IN THE ORDER OF THE STATUTES OF THE REALM.
* ↑ The chapters from 7 to 11 follow the numbering of the translation.
* ↑ 14 Hen. 3., Ruff.
* ↑ 38 Hen. 3., Ruff.
* ↑ 21 Hen. 3., Ruff.
* ↑ Not in Ruff
* ↑ 51 Hen. 3., Ruff. (App.)
* ↑ In this order in the Statues of the Realm
# Chronological Table and Index of the Statutes/Chronological Table/Hen6

* ↑ In Ruff., the titles of these three chapters are placed in succession, without any number, between cc. 9 & 10., Ruff.
* ↑ c. 10., Ruff.
* ↑ c. 11., Ruff.
* ↑ c. 12., Ruff.
* ↑ c. 13., Ruff.
* ↑ c. 14., Ruff.
* ↑ In Ruff. the title of this chapter is placed without a number between cc. 14 & 15., Ruff.
* ↑ c. 15., Ruff.
* ↑ c. 16., Ruff.
* ↑ c. 17., Ruff.
* ↑ There is no c. 28. in the Statutes of the Realm; see note there, vol 2. p. 261
# Chronological Table and Index of the Statutes/Chronological Table/Hen7

* ↑ To the end of Titulus Regis. This part not in Ruff.
* ↑ In this order in the Statutes of the Realm ; the chapters follow the numbering of the translation
* ↑ In this order in the Statutes of the Realm ; the chapters follow the numbering of the translation
* ↑ The numbers and order of the chapters of this year follow the translation.
* ↑ First par. of c. 1., Ruff.
* ↑ Second par. of c. 1., Ruff.
* ↑ c. 17., private, Ruff.
* ↑ The numbers of the chapters of this year follow the translation.
* ↑ Inclusive of the enactments placed under the heading : "An Acte for the passing and tensumatacon of lande without fyne."
* ↑ cc 2.,3., Ruff
* ↑ c. 4., Ruff
* ↑ c. 5., Ruff
* ↑ c. 6., Ruff
* ↑ c. 7., Ruff
* ↑ c. 8., Ruff
* ↑ c. 1.,private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 2.,private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 3.,private, Ruff.
* ↑ c 4.,private, Ruff.
* ↑ cc. 5–16., private, Ruff.
* ↑ Not in Ruff.
* ↑ cc. 1–38., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 39.,private, Ruff.
* ↑ cc. 1–4.,private, Ruff.
* ↑ cc. 7,8.,private,Ruff
* ↑ cc. 1, 2. ,private, Ruff.
* ↑ c.3.,private,Ruff.
* ↑ c. 4–7., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 8., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 9., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 10–17., private,Ruff.
# Chronological Table and Index of the Statutes/Chronological Table/Hen8

* ↑ c. 2., private, Ruff
* ↑ c. 5., private, Ruff.
* ↑ cc. 1–6., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 7., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 8., private, Ruff.
* ↑ cc. 1–8., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 9., private,Ruff.
* ↑ Not in Ruff
* ↑ c. 10., private,Ruff.
* ↑ c. 11., private,Ruff.
* ↑ cc. 1–8., private, ruff.
* ↑ c. 9,private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 10,11., private, Ruff.
* ↑ cc. 1–5, private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 6., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 7., private, Ruff.
* ↑ Not in Ruff
* ↑ c. 3., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 1., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 2., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 4., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 5., private,Ruff.
* ↑ cc. 5, 6., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 1., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 2., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 3., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 4., private, Ruff.
* ↑ cc. 7–22.,private, Ruff
* ↑ cc. 1, 2., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 3., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 4,5.,private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 1., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 2., private, Ruff.
* ↑ cc. 3–7., private, Ruff
* ↑ In Ruff., in the Appendix of obselete and curious Acts.
* ↑ cc. 1–14., private, Ruff.
* ↑ cc. 1–3., private. Ruff.
* ↑ cc. 1–7., private. Ruff.
* ↑ cc. 1–7., private. Ruff.
* ↑ cc. 35 (or 1), 2–13., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 14., private, Ruff.
* ↑ cc. 15–31., private, Ruff
* ↑ Not in Ruff.
* ↑ c. 32., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 33., private, Ruff.
* ↑ c. 34., private, Ruff.
* ↑ cc. 1–35., private. Ruff.
* ↑ c. 12., private. Ruff.
* ↑ Not in Ruff
# Chronological Table and Index of the Statutes/Chronological Table/Edw3

* ↑ Sts. 2,3., Ruff.
* ↑ St. 5., Ruff.
* ↑ This chapter in Ruff. includes the last par. of this Statute.
* ↑ 18 Edw. 3. St. 4.,Ruff.
* ↑ 18 Edw. 3. St. 5. Ruff
* ↑ St. 2., Ruff
* ↑ St. 1., Ruff
* ↑ St. 4., Ruff
* ↑ St. 3., Ruff
* ↑ St. 3., Ruff
* ↑ This follows 25 Edw. 3. St. 3., Ruff.
* ↑ The repeals effected by ss. 1,3, of this Act, and by the various subsequent Acts, except the Stat. Law Rev. Act. seem inoperative.
* ↑ Part of 46 Edw. 3., Ruff. (App.)
# Chronological Table and Index of the Statutes/Chronological Table/Hen5

* ↑ 3 Hen 5. St. 2., Ruff
* ↑ 4 Hen. 5, Ruff.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Animuccia, Giovanni

Animuccia, Giovanni, born at Florence, was an eminent composer of motets and madrigals in tour parts, printed at Venice, before the year 1558. He also published a set of masses at Rome, dedicated to the canons of the Vatican. He was chapel-master of St. Peter's, at Rome, and died in 1571. Animuccia is named as one of the companions of San Filippo Neri, who first applied music to the purpose of attracting company to the Chiesa Nuova, or New Chinch, at Rome, on Sunday evenings ; whence sacred dramas, or mysteries, or moralities, in music, were afterwards called oratorios.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Anjos, Dionisio Dos

Anjos, Dionisio Dos. A good composer and harpist ; he likewise performed on the viol da gamba. He died at Lisbon in 1709. He wrote some church music and motets.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Anleitung

Anleitung. (G.) An introduction. This term often occurs in the titles to German publications.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Anna, D. G. D'

Anna, D. G. D', an Italian, printed some trios for two violins and a bass, at Naples, in 1793.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Anna Amelia

Anna Amelia, of Prussia, sister to Frederic the Great, was born in 1723. She was a pupil in composition of Kirnberger, and composed a sacred cantata of extraordinary merit, and several other musical works. She died at Berlin in 1787, and bequeathed her very valuable collection of music to the Gymnasium at Berlin.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Anima, animo, animoso

Anima, animo, animoso, and ANIMATO. (I.) These words have all a similar meaning. The sound box of an instrument is the anima, the soul, the spirit of it. Animato, animated, is a term by which the Italians indicate that a movement is to be performed with boldness and spirit.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Anlage

Anlage. (G.) The plan or outline of a composition.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Annelli

Annelli. An Italian vocal composer towards the end of the last century.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Annibal

Annibal, of Padua. A renowned master on the organ at the end of the sixteenth century. Re composed motets, madrigals, and other works.
# Complete Encyclopaedia of Music/A/Annibali, Dominico

Annibali, Dominico. An Italian singer at the court of Saxony. He was engaged by Handel for his operas, in 1736.
# City of Englewood v. Denver & S. P. Railway Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
248 U.S. 294
City of Englewood v. Denver & S. P. Railway Company
Argued: Dec. 19, 1918. --- Decided: Jan 7, 1919
This is a bill to compel the defendant to arrange for passengers on its road to be transported without extra fare over the line of the Denver City Tramway Company from a point of connection and in like manner for passengers on that company's line to be carried over the defendant's line without additional charge. The defendant operates a street railway under a franchise granted by the plaintiff while a town. By section 6 of the ordinance making the grant the grantees were allowed to charge certain fares provided that they should make the arrangement stated above. The defence pleaded against being required to comply with these terms is that the Denver City Tramway Company charges five cents, the maximum fare allowed, for its part of the service, so that the defendant gets nothing, and that the defendant filed a schedule of rates with the State Public Utilities Commission which now are the defendant's established rates and charges. On demurrer the Supreme Court of the State held that this town, at least, deriving its powers from legislative grant, could make no contract of this sort that was not subject to control by the legislature, that the Public Utilities Commission had been authorized by the legislature to regulate the matter in controversy, that it had done so, and that this proceeding should be dismissed.
Of course we do not go behind the decision of the Court that the matter in controversy was subject to regulation by the Commission and was regulated by it in due form if the State could confer that power. The plaintiff says that the State could not conter it since to do so would impair the obligation of a contract. Upon that point we agree with the Court below that clearer language than can be found in the State laws and this ordinance must be used before a public service is withdrawn from public control. Milwaukee Electric Ry. & Light Co. v. Railroad Commission of Wisconsin, 238 U.S. 174, 180, 35 Sup. Ct. 820, 59 L. Ed. 1254. The cases generally are cases where the railroad or other company sets up contract rights against the city. Whether when the railroad consents a legislature would not have all the power that the city could have to modify even a constitutionally protected contract need not be considered here. If we deal with the present case on the merits there seems to be no sufficient reason why the writ of error should not be dismissed. It is giving the plaintiff the benefit of a very great doubt if we assume that the question on the merits was saved.
Writ of error dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# City of Fort Scott v. Hickman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
112 U.S. 150
City of Fort Scott v. Hickman
J. D. McCleverty, for plaintiff in error.
S. E. Brown, for defendant in error.
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# City of Englewood v. Denver & S. P. Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
248 U.S. 294
City of Englewood v. Denver & S. P. Railway Company
Argued: Dec. 19, 1918. --- Decided: Jan 7, 1919
Mr. L. F. Twitchell, of Denver, Colo., for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Fred Farrar, of Denver, Colo., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Collier's New Encyclopedia (1921)/Ohio, University of

Edition of 1921; disclaimer.
​OHIO, UNIVERSITY OF, a coeducational non-sectarian institution in Athens, O.; founded in 1804; reported at the close of 1900: Professors and instructors, 96; students, 3,957; president, Alston Ellis, Ph.D.
# Collier's New Encyclopedia (1921)/Ohio (river)

Edition of 1921; disclaimer.
​OHIO, a river of the United States, called by the French explorers, after its Indian name, la Belle Rivière (The Beautiful River), next to the Missouri the largest affluent of the Mississippi. It is formed by the union of the Allegheny and Monongahela at Pittsburgh, Pa., and flows W. S. W. 950 miles, with a breadth of 400 to 1,400 yards, draining, with its tributaries, an area of 214,000 square miles. In its course it separates the States of Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois from the States of West Virginia and Kentucky. The principal towns on its banks are Pittsburgh, Wheeling, Cincinnati, Louisville (where there are rapids of 22 feet in a mile, with a steamboat canal), Evansville, New Albany, Madison, Portsmouth, Covington, and Cairo. The river's principal affluents are the Tennessee, Cumberland, Wabash, Kentucky, Great Kanawha, Green, Muskingum and Scioto. It is usually navigable from Pittsburgh.
# Collier's New Encyclopedia (1921)/Ohm's Law

Edition of 1921; disclaimer.
​OHM'S LAW, in electricity, a law enunciated by Professor Ohm, in 1827, for determining the quantity of electromotive force in a voltaic battery. It is that the intensity of the current in a voltaic current is equal to the electromotive force divided by the resistance.
# Collier's New Encyclopedia (1921)/Ohio, Army of the

Edition of 1921; disclaimer.
​OHIO, ARMY OF THE, a division of the Federal army in the Civil War; organized in 1861-1862 by General Buell; afterward came under the command of General Rosecrans and was called the Army of the Cumberland. A second department of the Ohio was formed, and was also in 1865 incorporated in the Army of the Cumberland.