OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Wieman v. Updegraff
## Concurring Opinions

    Burton
    Black
    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
344 U.S. 183
Wieman v. Updegraff
Argued: Oct. 16, 1952. --- Decided: Dec 15, 1952
Mr. Don Emery, Oklahoma City, Okl., Mr. Robert J. Emery, Oklahoma City, Okl., on the brief, for appellants.
Messrs. Paul W. Updegraff, Norman, Okl., Fred Hansen, Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellees.
Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Wieman v. Updegraff/Concurrence Burton

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Burton Black Douglas
* Wikipedia article
United States Supreme Court
344 U.S. 183
Wieman v. Updegraff
Argued: Oct. 16, 1952. --- Decided: Dec 15, 1952
Mr. Justice BURTON concurs in the result.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Vizagapatam/Gazetteer/Pottangi Taluk

POTTANGI TALUK.
Pottangi taluk stands in the centre of the 3,000 feet plateau. In general appearance it much resembles its next neighbour Koraput, already referred to above, consisting (except along the edge of the plateau, which is fairly wooded and comprises a line of fine hills running up to 5,000 feet) of an almost totally bare, red soil, table-land dotted with small, bare, red hills, both of which are cultivated with dry crops and a little paddy in their damper hollows. It is traversed from east to west by the important road which runs from Salur on the plains, up the 'Pottangi ghat' (see p. 139), past Pottangi, the taluk head-quarters, to Koraput, and thence down to Jeypore. Two places in it may be mentioned : —
Nandapuram, once (see p. 280) the head-quarters of a taluk, about 15 miles west of Pottangi as the crow flies and is reached by a track taking off at Sembliguda from the Pottangi-Koraput road. As has been stated above (p. 264), this village, which now contains only 1,051 inhabitants, was formerly the capital of the Jeypore estate. In old records the property is always called the Nandapuram zamindari. It still contains relics of its former importance. Remains may be seen of a mud fort which apparently surrounded the whole place; in the northern part of the village are two boulders on one of which are sculptured two figures in relief while the other has been fashioned into an elephant; near the cutcherry of the amin of the Jeypore estate is a stone bearing an inscription; about a mile to the south-east is a stone Ganapati some six feet high; the same distance to the north is the shrine of Sarvesvara, in which are more inscriptions (inscriptions are rarities in the hills); and in the village itself are the ruins of the famous 'throne of thirty-two steps' — a flight of this number of stone steps which leads to a roughly circular granite slab on which, it is said, the early chiefs of Jeypore were always installed. About three miles along the track to Sembliguda is a still more ancient and curious relic, namely, a small shrine in which are three stone images of nude individuals sitting cross-legged, which appear to belong either to Buddhist or Jain times.
Pottangi, the head-quarters of the taluk, is a small village of 726 inhabitants built at the foot of the great Damuku hill and containing the deputy tahsildar's office and a pleasant travellers' bungalow surrounded with good trees. It gives its name to the ghat road from Salur at the head of which it stands, and the Tadivalasa (or Turner's) ghat from the plains also ends there.
# Vocabulary of Menander (1913)

* related portals: Ancient Greek drama.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, quotes, definition, textbook, Wikidata item.
This work contains many abbreviations involving lowercase L (l) and capital I (I) that can be difficult to distinguish in a font without serifs. See Help:Layout or Help:Fonts for possible assistance in selecting a serif font for reading.
Layout 2
THE
VOCABULARY OF MENANDER
CONSIDERED IN ITS RELATION TO THE KOINE
A DISSERTATION
PRESENTED TO THE
Faculty of Princeton University in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
BY
DONALD BLYTHE DURHAM
1913
Accepted by the Department of Classics
June, 1911
PREFACE
Since the acceptance of this dissertation a great deal of work has been done upon the word-list in chapter III, and this has delayed publication. It is hoped that the list is fairly complete, and that it may be of permanent value to students of Greek lexicography.
When the work was well advanced, Bruhn's treatise "Ueber den Wortschatz des Menander" (Kieler diss., Jena, 1910) appeared, which seemed to cover the same ground. But since his method and arrangement were very different from mine, and since the canon of Attic writers adopted by him was not identical with mine, I continued my investigation and have endeavored to show by clearer evidence Menander's position in the history of the Greek language.
I wish to express my indebtedness to the professors of the Department of Classics of Princeton University for their help in all my work and particularly during the preparation of this thesis. I am under especial obligations to Professor Edward Capps, who suggested the subject, for advice and stimulating criticism. He has also read all the proof; and if, as I hope, the number of errors is not large, it is due in a great measure to his care.
Donald Blythe Durham
Princeton University August 16, 1913.
CONTENTS
PAGE
Method employed 7— Limits set 8— Writers accepted as good Attic 9.
Standards of the Grammatical Schools 12— Classification of Words of Menander attacked by the Grammarians 16— Words defined by ἀντί τινος 19— Words approved by the Grammarians 20.
Comic Compounds 22— Diminutives 23— Variations in Accent and Gender 23— Compounds with ἀ-privative 24— Compounds with δυσ- 24— Words in -ώδης 24— Types characteristic of the Koine 26— Words in -μα 26— in -μός 28— in -ικός 29— in -τος 30— in -ίζω 30— Double Compounds 31— All Groups combined 34— Conclusion 34.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1950, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 73 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Words for the Chisel (collection)/Eruption in Utopia

A Note on the Type in Which This Book Is Set
This book is set (on the Linotype) in Elzevir No. 3, a French Old Style. For the modern revival of this excellent face we are indebted to Gustave Mayeur of Paris, who reproduced it in 1878, basing his designs, he says, on types used in a book which was printed by the Elzevirs at Leyden in 1634. The Elzevir family held a distinguished position as printers and publishers for more than a century, their best work appearing between about 1590 and 1680. Although the Elzevirs were not themselves type founders, they utilized the services of the best type designers of their time, notably Van Dijk, Garamond, and Sanlecque. Many of their books were small, or, as we should say now, "pocket" editions, of the classics, and for these volumes the developed a type face which is open and readab but relatively narrow in body, although in no sense condensed, thus permitting a large amount of copy to be set in limited space without impairing legibility.
Set up, electrotyped, printed and bound by the Vail-Baillou Press, Inc., Binghamton, N. Y. · Paper manufactured by S. D. Warren & Co., Boston, Mass.
# Woolley v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.

* related portals: New Jersey case law.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
99 N.J. 284; 491 A.2d 1257
RICHARD M. WOOLLEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division.
No. A-98 Argued: March 21, 1983 --- Decided: May 9, 1985
Timothy G. Hagan, a member of the Michigan bar, argued the cause for appellant (Rabner & Allcorn, attorneys; Thomas Tucker, on the briefs).
Frederick C. Kentz, III, argued the cause for respondent (Crummy, Del Deo, Dolan & Purcell, attorneys).
For reversal and remandment — Chief Justice Wilentz and Justices Clifford, Schreiber, Handler, Pollock, O'Hern and Garibaldi. Opposed — None. The opinion of the Court was delivered by Wilentz, C.J.
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Woolsey v. Best

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
299 U.S. 1
Woolsey v. Best
Argued: Oct. 12, 1936. ---
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Colorado.
Mr. Thomas H. Gibson, of Denver, Colo., for appellant.
Mr. Charles Roach, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Woolsey v. Best/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
299 U.S. 1
Woolsey v. Best
Argued: Oct. 12, 1936. ---
Appellant brought this proceeding in the Supreme Court of Colorado to obtain a writ of habeas corpus. His petition was denied without opinion. It appears that appellant was held pursuant to conviction for violation of section 2676, C.L.1921, being section 40, c. 44, Sess.Laws 1913, of the laws of Colorado (see, also, section 2740, C.L.1921, being section 85, chapter 44 of Session Laws of 1913), the judgment of conviction having been affirmed by the Supreme Court of the state. Woolsey v. People, 98 Colo. 62, 53 P.(2d) 596.
It is well established that the writ of habeas corpus cannot be used as a writ of error. This is the rule in Colorado as well as in this Court. The judgment of conviction was not subject to collateral attack. People ex rel. Burchinell v. District Court, 22 Colo. 422, 45 P. 402; Martin v. District Court, 37 Colo. 110, 115, 86 P. 82, 119 Am.St.Rep. 262; Chemgas v. Tynan, 51 Colo. 35, 116 P. 1045; In re Arakawa, 78 Colo. 193, 196, 240 P. 940; In re Nottingham, 84 Colo. 123, 128, 268 P. 587. Compare Harlan v. McGourin, 218 U.S. 442, 31 S.Ct. 44, 54 L.Ed. 1101, 21 Ann.Cas. 849; Riddle v. Dyche, 262 U.S. 333, 43 S.Ct. 555, 67 L.Ed. 1009; Craig v. Hecht, 263 U.S. 255, 277, 44 S.Ct. 103, 106, 68 L.Ed. 293; Knewel v. Egan, 268 U.S. 442, 445, 446, 45 S.Ct. 522, 524, 69 L.Ed. 1036; Cox v. People of State of Colorado, 282 U.S. 807, 51 S.Ct. 103, 75 L.Ed. 724. It is apparent from the record submitted that the state court had jurisdiction to try the appellant for violation of the statute in question and that any federal question properly raised as to the validity of the statute could have been heard and determined on appeal to this Court from the final judgment in that action. The Supreme Court of the state was not required by the Federal Constitution to entertain such questions on the subsequent petition for habeas corpus, and it does not appear that its denial of the petition did not rest upon an adequate nonfederal ground. Lynch v. State of New York, 293 U.S. 52, 55 S.Ct. 16, 79 L.Ed. 191, and cases there cited. The appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction.
Dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Woolworth Company v. Contemporary Arts

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Black
United States Supreme Court
344 U.S. 228
Woolworth Company v. Contemporary Arts
Argued: Nov. 17, 1952. --- Decided: Dec 22, 1952
Mr. Kenneth W. Greenawalt, New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Cedric W. Porter, Boston, Mass., for respondent.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Worcester County Trust Company v. Riley

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 292
Worcester County Trust Company v. Riley
Argued: Nov. 15, 16, 1937. --- Decided: Dec 6, 1937
Messrs. Merrill S. June and Bradley B. Gilman, both of Worcester, Mass., for petitioner.
Mr. James J. Ronan, of Salem, Mass., for Henry F. Long, Commissioner of Corporations and Taxation of Massachusetts, intervener by special leave of court.
Mr. George S. Fuller, of Boston, Mass., for respondent.
[Amicus Curiae Information from page 293 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Woolford Realty Company v. Rose

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
286 U.S. 319
Woolford Realty Company v. Rose
Argued: April 19, 1932. --- Decided: May 16, 1932
Mr. William A. Sutherland, of Atlanta, Ga. (Messrs. Elbert P. Tuttle and Joseph B. Brennan, both of Atlanta, Ga., on the brief), for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 320-322 intentionally omitted]
The Attorney General and Mr. Whitney North Seymour, of Washington, D. C. (Messrs. Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key, John H. McEvers, and Wilbur H. Friedman, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.
Messrs. Frederick L. Pearce, George M. Morris, Louis Titus, and Henry M. Ward, all of Washington, D. C., amici curiae.
Mr. Justice CARDOZO delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Völsunga Saga/Chapter 20

Layout 2
London: Walter Scott, 24 Warwick Lane, pages 68–75
CHAP. XX.
Of Sigurd’s Meeting with Brynhild on the Mountain.
BY long roads rides Sigurd, till he comes at the last up on to Hindfell, and wends his way south to the land of the Franks; and he sees before him on the fell a great light, as of fire burning, and flaming up even unto the heavens; and when he came thereto, lo, a shield-hung castle before him, and a banner on the topmost thereof: into the castle went Sigurd, and saw one lying there asleep, and all-armed. Therewith he takes the helm from off the head of him, and sees that it is no man, but a woman; and she was clad in a byrny as closely set on her as though it had grown to her flesh; so he rent it from the collar downwards; and then the sleeves thereof, and ever the sword bit on it as if it were cloth. Then said Sigurd that over-long had she lain asleep; but she asked—
“What thing of great might is it that has prevailed to rend my byrny, and draw me from my sleep?”
Even as sings the song—
“Ah, is it so, that here is come Sigurd Sigmundson, bearing Fafnir’s helm on his head and Fafnir’s bane in his hand?”
Then answered Sigurd—
“Of the Volsung’s kin is he who has done the deed; but now I have heard that thou art daughter of a mighty king, and folk have told us that thou wert lovely and full of lore, and now I will try the same.”
Then Brynhild sang—
Then Brynhild speaks again and says, “Two kings fought, one hight Helm Gunnar, an old man, and the greatest of warriors, and Odin had promised the victory unto him; but his foe was Agnar, or Audi’s brother: and so I smote down Helm Gunnar in the fight; and Odin, in vengeance for that deed, stuck the sleep-thorn into me, and said that I should never again have the victory, but should be given away in marriage; but thereagainst I vowed a vow, that never would I wed one who knew the name of fear.”
Then said Sigurd, “Teach us the lore of mighty matters!”
She said, “Belike thou cannest more skill in all than I; yet will I teach thee; yea, and with thanks, if there be aught of my cunning that will in anywise pleasure thee, either of runes or of other matters that are the root of things; but now let us drink together, and may the Gods give to us twain a good day, that thou mayst win good help and fame from my wisdom, and that thou mayst hereafter mind thee of that which we twain speak together.”
Then Brynhild filled a beaker and bore it to Sigurd, and gave him the drink of love, and spake—
Then answered Sigurd—
* ↑ The stanzas on the two following pages were inserted here from Sigdrifasmál by the translators.
* ↑ Goddesses.
Footnotes
# Völsunga Saga/Chapter 22

Layout 2
London: Walter Scott, 24 Warwick Lane, pages 78–79
CHAP. XXII.
Of the Semblance and Array of Sigurd Fafnir’s-bane.
NOW Sigurd rides away; many-folded is his shield, and blazing with red gold, and the image of a dragon is drawn thereon; and this same was dark brown above, and bright red below; and with even such-like image was adorned helm, and saddle, and coat-armour; and he was clad in the golden byrny, and all his weapons were gold-wrought.
Now for this cause was the drake drawn on all his weapons, that when he was seen of men, all folk might know who went there; yea, all those who had heard of his slaying of that great dragon, that the Vœrings call Fafnir; and for that cause are his weapons gold-wrought, and brown of hue, and that he was by far above other men in courtesy and goodly manners, and well-nigh in all things else; and whenas folk tell of all the mightiest champions, and the noblest chiefs, then ever is he named the foremost, and his name goes wide about on all tongues north of the sea of the Greek-lands, and even so shall it be while the world endures.
Now the hair of this Sigurd was golden-red of hue, fair of ​fashion, and falling down in great locks; thick and short was his beard, and of no other colour; high-nosed he was, broad and high-boned of face; so keen were his eyes, that few durst gaze up under the brows of him; his shoulders were as broad to look on as the shoulders of two; most duly was his body fashioned betwixt height and breadth, and in such wise as was seemliest; and this is the sign told of his height, that when he was girt with his sword Gram, which same was seven spans long, as he went through the full-grown rye-fields, the dew-shoe of the said sword smote the ears of the standing corn; and, for all that, greater was his strength than his growth: well could he wield sword, and cast forth spear, shoot shaft, and hold shield, bend bow, back horse, and do all the goodly deeds that he learned in his youth’s days.
Wise he was to know things yet undone; and the voice of all fowls he knew, wherefore few things fell on him unawares.
Of many words he was, and so fair of speech withal, that whensoever he made it his business to speak, he never left speaking before that to all men it seemed full sure, that no otherwise must the matter be than as he said.
His sport and pleasure it was to give aid to his own folk, and to prove himself in mighty matters, to take wealth from his unfriends, and give the same to his friends.
Never did he lose heart, and of naught was he adrad.
Footnotes
# Æsop's Fables (V. S. Vernon-Jones)/The Miser

* related authors: Arthur Rackham.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
THE MISER
A MISER sold everything he had, and melted down his hoard of gold into a single lump, which he buried secretly in a field. Every day he went to look at it, and would sometimes spend long hours gloating over his treasure. One of his men noticed his frequent visits to the spot, and one day watched him and discovered his secret. Waiting his opportunity, he went one night and dug up the gold and stole it. Next day the Miser visited the place as usual, and, finding his treasure gone, fell to tearing his hair and groaning over his loss. In this condition he was seen by one of his neighbours, who asked him what his trouble was. The Miser told him of his misfortune; but the other replied, “Don’t take it so much to heart, my friend; put a brick into the hole, and take a look at it every day: you won’t be any worse off than before, for even when you had your gold it was of no earthly use to you.”
THE MISER
# Æsop's Fables (V. S. Vernon-Jones)/The Mistress And Her Servants

THE MISTRESS AND HER SERVANTS
A WIDOW, thrifty and industrious, had two servants, whom she kept pretty hard at work. They were not allowed to lie long abed in the mornings, but the old lady had them up and doing as soon as the cock crew. They disliked intensely having to get up at such an hour, especially in winter-time: and they thought that if it ​were not for the cock waking up their Mistress so horribly early, they could sleep longer. So they caught it and wrung its neck. But they weren't prepared for the consequences. For what happened was that their Mistress, not hearing the cock crow as usual, waked them up earlier than ever, and set them to work in the middle of the night.
# Æsop's Fables (V. S. Vernon-Jones)/The Mice and the Weasels

THE MICE AND THE WEASELS
THERE was war between the Mice and the Weasels, in which the Mice always got the worst of it, numbers of them being killed and eaten by the Weasels. So they called a council of war, in which an old Mouse got up and said, “It’s no wonder we are always beaten, for we have no generals to plan our battles and direct our movements in the field.” Acting on his advice, they chose the biggest Mice to be their leaders, and these, in order to be distinguished from the rank and file, provided themselves with helmets bearing large plumes of straw. They then led out the Mice to battle, confident of victory: but they were defeated as usual, and were ​soon scampering as fast as they could to their holes. All made their way to safety without difficulty except the leaders, who were so hampered by the badges of their rank that they could not get into their holes, and fell easy victims to their pursuers.
Greatness carries its own penalties.