OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# The Dictionary of Australasian Biography/Cooper, Sir Daniel

Layout 2
​Cooper, Sir Daniel, Bart., G.C.M.G., second son of Thomas Cooper, of Richmond Cottage, Double Bay, near Sydney, N.S.W., who emigrated to Australia from Bolton-le-Moors, Lancashire, was born on July 1st, 1821. In 1843 he went to New South Wales, and was elected a member of the Legislative Council in 1849. In 1856 he was returned to the first Legislative Assembly of that colony for Sydney Hamlets, and was chosen the first Speaker of the Lower House. This position he held till 1860, ​when he resigned, and was asked to form a Ministry in succession to that of the late Mr. Forster. He, however, declined, and returned to reside in England in 1861. He married in 1846 Elizabeth, third daughter of William Hill, of Sydney, and was knighted in 1857, created a baronet in 1863, K.C.M.G. in 1880, and G.C.M.G. in 1888. Sir Daniel has on several occasions been Acting Agent-General for New South Wales, and was a member of the Royal Commission for the Colonial and Indian Exhibition in 1886. The primary honours conferred on Sir Daniel Cooper were due to his spirited action in subscribing to the relief of the sufferers during the Crimean war and the Lancashire cotton famine. Sir Daniel is a member of the Senate of Sydney University and President of the Bank of New South Wales.
# The Dictionary of Australasian Biography/Cooke, Ebenezer

Layout 2
​Cooke, Ebenezer, J. P., Commissioner of Audit, South Australia, was accountant and subsequently manager of the English and Australian Copper Company in South Australia from 1862 to 1882. From 1875 (in which year he was made J.P.) to 1882 he represented Flinders in the Legislative Assembly of South Australia. Mr. Cooke was Chairman of the Royal Commission on Finance from 1880 to 1882, and a member of the Royal Commission on Education from 1882 to 1883. In February of the latter year he was appointed First Commissioner of Audit.
# The Dictionary of Australasian Biography/Cooper, Hon. Pope Alexander

Layout 2
​Cooper, Hon. Pope Alexander, M.A., Puisne Judge, Queensland, fifth son of Francis Cooper, of Sydney, N.S.W., was educated at Sydney University, where he took the Gilchrist and several other scholarships, and graduated B.A. and M.A. He matriculated at London University, and entered as a student of the Middle Temple in Oct. 1868, being called to the bar in June 1872, when he returned to Queensland, and commenced practice in June 1874. Mr. Cooper was returned to the Assembly for Bowen, and was appointed Attorney-General and a member of the Executive Council in the McIlwraith Ministry in Dec. 1880. He resigned office in Jan. 1883 on being appointed to his present position of Judge of the Supreme Court, Northern division. Mr. Justice Cooper married, on August 19th, 1873, Alice Frener, daughter of James Cooper, of London.
# The Dictionary of Australasian Biography/Perceval, Westby Brook

Layout 2
​Perceval, Westby Brook, K.G.S., Agent-General for New Zealand, is eldest son of the late Westby Hawkshaw Perceval, of Rangiora, N.Z., and was born in Tasmania in 1854. He was educated at Christ College Grammar School, Christchurch, N.Z., and at Stonyhurst, and matriculated at the London University in 1875. He entered at the Middle Temple in April 1875, and was called to the English Bar in May 1878. Having returned to New Zealand, he practised as a barrister and solicitor in Christchurch, and was returned to the House of Representatives for that city at the general election in the year 1887, and again in Dec. 1890. On the meeting of Parliament in 1891, he was elected Chairman of Committees of the House of Representatives, but resigned the position on his appointment as Agent-General of the colony in London in succession to Sir F. Dillon Bell. Mr. Perceval left New Zealand in Oct 1891, and assumed the duties of the position in the following month. He married in May 1880 Jessie, the youngest daughter of the late Hon. John Johnston, M.L.C. (q.v.). In 1892 he was appointed to represent New Zealand on the governing body of the Imperial Institute, and Knight Commander of St. Gregory by the Pope.
# The Dictionary of Australasian Biography/Perkins, Hon. Patrick

Layout 2
​Perkins, Hon. Patrick, M.L.A., J. P. second son of Thomas Perkins, a farmer in Tipperary, was born at Cashel on Oct. 14th, 1838. He emigrated to Victoria with his father and brothers, and, after a more than usually varied experience as a miner and storekeeper on the diggings, started breweries in that colony and in Queensland, where he went permanently to reside in 1876. In the same year he was returned to the Legislative Assembly for D'Aubigny, beating the late Mr. Angus Mackay, then editor of the Queenslander, by a large majority. Mr. Perkins was Minister of Lands in the first McIlwraith Ministry from Jan. 1879 to Nov. 1883. At the general election in May 1888 he was returned for Cambooya.
# The Dictionary of Australasian Biography/Phillimore, Major William George

Find main topic
Layout 2
​Phillimore, Major William George, R.A., was born on Nov. 30th, 1851, and, having entered the army, became lieutenant R.A. in Dec. 1871 and captain in July 1881. He was appointed commandant of the local forces in Western Australia, with the local rank of major in July 1886, and major R.A., with local rank of lieut.-colonel, in Sept. 1887. He returned to England in 1890. Major Phillimore is the second son of the late Rev. George Phillimore, J.P., and Harriette Maria, his wife, daughter of William Willoughby Prescott. He married in 1889 Mabel Lee, daughter of Robert George Massie, of Sydney, N.S.W.
# The Dictionary of Australasian Biography/Piddington, Hon. William Richman

Layout 2
​Piddington, Hon. William Richman, M.L.C., was born in London in 1815, and was brought up to the book trade. He emigrated to New South Wales in 1838, and after farming on the Hunter, pursued his original vocation with great success in Sydney. He took a prominent part in opposing transportation in 1848, and when responsible government was inaugurated, in 1856, he was returned to the Legislative Assembly for the Northumberland and Hunter district. He subsequently represented the Hawkesbury, but lost his seat in 1877. He joined the first Parkes Government in May 1872, but ill-health compelled him to resign in the following December. He was Colonial Treasurer in the second Parkes Ministry, from March to August 1877, and two months later was thrown out of Parliament at the general election. He was subsequently appointed to the Legislative Council. Mr. Piddington died on Nov. 25th, 1887.
# The Dictionary of Australasian Biography/Perrin, George Samuel

Layout 2
​Perrin, George Samuel, F.L.S., was appointed Forester in the Woods and Forest Department of South Australia in 1880, Chief Forester at Wirrabura in 1885, Conservator of Forests in Tasmania in 1886, and Conservator of Forests in Victoria in June 1888.
# The Dictionary of Australasian Biography/Peterswald, William John

Find main topic
Layout 2
​Peterswald, William John, J.P., was formerly Inspector of Police in South Australia, and in May 1882 was appointed Commissioner of Police in that colony. Mr. Peterswald is of German origin, and is the only son of the late Colonel William Peterswald, of Jamaica, by his marriage with Jean, daughter of Captain Walter Gray. He was born in Jamaica in Nov. 1829, and was educated at Jersey, where he subsequently resided and became a captain of militia. Mr. Peterswald married in 1852 Emily Mary, daughter of Charles de St. Croix, and ​emigrated to South Australia in the same year.
# The Dictionary of Australasian Biography/Petherick, Edward Augustus

Layout 2
​Petherick, Edward Augustus, F.L.S., F.R.G.S., is the eldest son of Peter John Petherick and grandson of Edward Jarman Petherick, R.N., of Bridgwater, and was born on March 6th, 1847, at Burnham, Somerset He went to Australia with his parents in 1852. Ten years later he entered the bookselling and publishing house of Mr. George Robertson, of Melbourne, and in 1870 was sent to London as buyer and representative of the firm and its correspondents in Australia and New Zealand. He is the editor of the "Torch" and "Colonial Book Circular", a guide to new books, English and American, including publications relating to or issued in the British colonies. Mr. Petherick has done much bibliographical work, among which may be mentioned a "Bibliography of Australasia," now in course of publication, and a "Catalogue of the York Gate Library" (S. W. Silver), issued in 1882 and extended and reissued in 1886 as "An Index to the Literature of Geography and Travels in all Ages and Countries." He is also the author of a series of papers contributed to the Melbourne Review, treating especially of discovery in the Southern Hemisphere. He is head of the firm of E. A. Petherick & Co., booksellers, Melbourne, Sydney, Adelaide, and London, and possesses a large and valuable library of colonial works.
# The Dictionary of Australasian Biography/Philp, Robert

Layout 2
​Philp, Robert, M.L.A. for Townsville, Queensland, was born in Scotland, and is a member of the extensive mercantile firm of Burns, Philp & Co., Ld., which he established in conjunction with Mr. James Burns. He was elected a member for the new electorate of Musgrave in Jan. 1886, and in 1888 for Townsville.
# The Dictionary of Australasian Biography/Phillips, Major George B.

Find main topic
Layout 2
​Phillips, Major George B., Commandant of the Military Defence Force, Western Australia, was appointed a writer in the Colonial Secretary's office, Western Australia, in 1851; third clerk in 1852; second clerk in 1856, and was also employed in the Governor's private office; assistant district registrar of births, deaths, and marriages in 1856; acting chief clerk in 1865; chief clerk in March 1866; and also held the offices of Registrar-General, Registrar of Titles and Registrar of Deeds; acted as Colonial Secretary from Dec. 1872 to July 1873; as acting Colonial Treasurer, from July 1875 to August 1877 and Jan. 1878 to Jan. 1880, with a seat in the Executive Council; he was created a J.P. in 1878; was appointed assistant Colonial Secretary in Jan. 1880; and was acting Colonial Secretary from Jan. to Sept. 1880. He was subsequently appointed Superintendent of police, and retired from the volunteer force with the rank of major in July 1888. In 1890 Major Phillips was appointed Commandant of the volunteer force by the Governor, and the Colonial Secretary subsequently signified his approval.
# Bannon v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
156 U.S. 464
Bannon v. United States
This was a writ of error to review a conviction of the plaintiffs in error, who were jointly indicted with 25 others, for a conspiracy 'to commit an offense against the United States,' in aiding and abetting the landing in the United States of Chinese laborers in violation of the exclusion act, by furnishing such laborers false, fraudulent, and pretended evidences of identification, and by counseling, advising, and directing said laborers, and furnishing them information and advice touching the questions liable to be asked them upon their application for permission to land, and by various other means to the grand jury unknown. The times, places, manner, and means of such conspiracy are set forth in the indictment.
Most of the defendants were arrested on the day the indictment was filed, and demurred to the same for failing to set forth facts sufficient to constitute an offense against the laws of the United States. The demurrer being overruled, the trial proceeded against twenty of the defendants, and was concluded by a verdict finding the plaintiffs in error, together with one Dunbar, guilty as charged in the indictment. The others were acquitted, except two, as to whom the jury were unable to agree. The usual motions for a new trial having been made and overruled, plaintiff in error Mulkey was sentenced to pay a fine of $5,000, and to be imprisoned for one year, and Bannon was also sentenced to imprisonment for six months. Whereupon they sued out this writ of error.
B. F. Dowell, for plaintiff in error Bannon.
A. T. Britton and A. B. Browne, for plaintiff in error Mulkey.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Conrad, for the United States.
Mr. Justice BROWN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Banquet to the Honorable Carl Schurz

CONTENTS.
| | Page |
| Introductory Note | 5 |
| Speech of the Honorable Charles Francis Adams, Chairman | 17 |
| Speech of Doctor A. Jacobi | 25 |
| Speech of Professor William M. Sloane | 33 |
| Speech of General John T. Lockman | 37 |
| Speech of the Honorable William H. Fleming | 42 |
| Speech of the Honorable Moorfield Storey | 48 |
| Speech of Mr. Herbert Welsh | 53 |
| Speech of Mr. Edward M. Shepard | 59 |
| Speech of the Honorable Carl Schurz | 65 |
| Letters and Telegrams received | 73 |
| Subscribers to the Banquet | 95 |
Complimentary Banquet
to the
Honorable Carl Schurz
on the Seventieth Anniversary of his Birthday
Thursday, March the second, 1899
Given by his friends, at Delmonico's
Fifth Avenue and Forty-fourth Street, New York
BANQUET
TO THE
HONORABLE CARL SCHURZ
ON THE
Seventieth Anniversary of his Birthday
MARCH 2, 1899.
SPEECHES MADE ON THE OCCASION.
DELMONICO'S, NEW-YORK.
COMMITTEE OF ARRANGEMENTS. :
| GUSTAV H. SCHWAB, |||
| CHARLES STEWART SMITH, | HUBERT CILLIS, |
| WILLIAM BAYARD CUTTING, | WILLIAM JAY SCHIEFFELIN, |
| CHARLES C. BEAMAN, | ARTHUR VON BRIESEN, |
| GEORGE WILSON. |||
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume III/Anti-Marcion/Against Hermogenes/XLIII

Chapter XLIII.—Other Discrepancies Exposed and Refuted Respecting the Evil in Matter Being Changed to Good.
On the subject of motion I would make this further remark. Following the simile of the boiling caldron, you say that motion in Matter, before it was regulated, was confused, restless, incomprehensible by reason of excess in the commotion. Then again you go on to say, “But it waited for the regulation of God, and kept its irregular motion incomprehensible, owing to the tardiness of its irregular motion.” Just before you ascribe commotion, here tardiness, to motion. Now observe how many slips you make respecting the nature of Matter. In a former passage you say, “If Matter were naturally evil, it would not have admitted of a change for the better; nor would God have ever applied to it any attempt at arrangement, for His labour would have been in vain.” You therefore concluded your two opinions, that Matter was not by nature evil, and that its nature was incapable of being changed by God; and then, forgetting them, you afterwards drew this inference: “But when it received adjustment from God, and was reduced to order, it relinquished its nature.” Now, inasmuch as it was transformed to good, it was of course transformed from evil; and if by God’s setting it in order it relinquished the nature of evil, it follows that its nature came to an end; now its nature was evil before the adjustment, but after the transformation it might have relinquished that nature.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Concretus.
* ↑ Certaminis.
* ↑ Compositionem: “arrangement.”
* ↑ See above, ch. xxxvii. p. 498.
* ↑ Ornata.
* ↑ Cessavit a.
* ↑ Cessavit.
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume III/Anti-Marcion/Against Hermogenes/XL

Chapter XL.—Shapeless Matter an Incongruous Origin for God’s Beautiful Cosmos. Hermogenes Does Not Mend His Argument by Supposing that Only a Portion of Matter Was Used in the Creation.
You say that Matter was reformed for the better—from a worse condition, of course; and thus you would make the better a copy of the worse. Everything was in confusion, but now it is reduced to order; and would you also say, that out of order, disorder is produced? No one thing is the exact mirror of another thing; that is to say, it is not its co-equal. Nobody ever found himself in a barber’s looking-glass look like an ass instead of a man; unless it be he who supposes that unformed and shapeless Matter answers to Matter which is now arranged and beautified in the fabric of the world. What is there now that is without form in the world, what was there once that was formed in Matter, that the world is the mirror of Matter? Since the world is known among the Greeks by a term denoting ornament, how can it present the image of unadorned Matter, in such a way that you can say the whole is known by its parts? To that whole will certainly belong even the portion which has not yet become formed; and you have already declared that the whole of Matter was not used as material in the creation. It follows, then, that this rude, and confused, and unarranged portion cannot be recognized in the polished, and distinct and well-arranged parts of creation, which indeed can hardly with propriety be called parts of Matter, since they have quitted its condition, by being separated from it in the transformation they have undergone.

## Footnotes

* ↑ In melius reformatam.
* ↑ Speculum.
* ↑ Mulus.
* ↑ Speciatum: εἰδοποιηθέν, “arranged in specific forms.”
* ↑ Κόσμος.
* ↑ Inornatæ: unfurnished with forms of beauty.
* ↑ Non totam eam fabricatam.
* ↑ Recesserunt a forma ejus.
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume III/Anti-Marcion/Against Hermogenes/XLI

Chapter XLI.—Sundry Quotations from Hermogenes. Now Uncertain and Vague are His Speculations Respecting Motion in Matter, and the Material Qualities of Good and Evil.
I come back to the point of motion, that I may show how slippery you are at every step. Motion in Matter was disordered, and confused, and turbulent. This is why you apply to it the comparison of a boiler of hot water surging over. Now how is it, that in another passage another sort of motion is affirmed by you? For when you want to represent Matter as neither good nor evil, you say: “Matter, which is the substratum (of creation) possessing as it does motion in an equable impulse, tends in no very great degree either to good or to evil.” Now if it had this equable impulse, it could not be turbulent, nor be like the boiling water of the caldron; it would rather be even and regular, oscillating indeed of its own accord between good and evil, but yet not prone or tending to either side. It would swing, as the phrase is, in a just and exact balance. Now this is not unrest; this is not turbulence or inconstancy; but rather the regularity, and evenness, and exactitude of a motion, inclining to neither side. If it oscillated this way and that way, and inclined rather to one particular side, it would plainly in that case merit the reproach of unevenness, and inequality, and turbulence. Moreover, although the motion of Matter was not prone either to good or to evil, it would still, of course, oscillate between good and evil; so that from this circumstance too it is obvious that Matter is contained within certain limits, because its motion, while prone to neither good nor evil, since it had no natural bent either way, oscillated from either between both, and therefore was contained within the limits of the two. But you, in fact, place both good and evil in a local habitation, when you assert that motion in Matter inclined to neither of them. For Matter which was local, when inclining neither hither nor thither, inclined not to the places in which good and evil were. But when you assign locality to good and evil, you make them corporeal by making them local, since those things which have local space must needs first have bodily substance. In fact, incorporeal things could not have any locality of their own except in a body, when they have access to a body. But when Matter inclined not to good and evil, it was as corporeal or local essences that it did not incline to them. You err, therefore, when you will have it that good and evil are substances. For you make substances of the things to which you assign locality; but you assign locality when you keep motion in Matter poised equally distant from both sides.

## Footnotes

* ↑ From which he has digressed since ch. xxxvi., p. 497.
* ↑ Subjacens materia.
* ↑ Æqualis momenti motum.
* ↑ Passivitas.
* ↑ Determinabilem.
* ↑ In loco facis: “you localise.”
* ↑ In loco.
* ↑ Denique.
* ↑ Cum corpori accedunt: or, “when they are added to a body.”
* ↑ Loca: “places;” one to each.
* ↑ Cum ab utraque regione suspendis: equally far from good and evil.
# The Duke of Argyle's Courtship to an English Lady

Traditional Scottish song. Sometimes shortened to just The Duke of Argyle's Courtship.
* "Argyle's Courtship to a an [sic] English Lady" in Three Songs (1800s(?))
* "The Duke of Argyle's Courtship to an English Lady" in The Jolly Beggar to which is added... (1840)
* "The Duke of Argyle's Courtship to an English Lady" in The Jolly Beggar to which are added... (1850s)
# The Duke of Gordon's Daughters (1823)

There are differences between the titles given on title page and those at the head of each song. Where this is the case, the latter have been used.
THE
Duke of Gordon's Daughters;
To which are added,
Leeze me on my spinnin' wheel
STIRLING: Printed by W. Macnie.
1823.
* The Duke of Gordon's Daughters
* Leeze Me On My Spinning Wheel
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ante-Nicene Fathers/Volume III/Anti-Marcion/Against Hermogenes/XLII

Chapter XLII.—Further Exposure of Inconsistencies in the Opinions of Hermogenes Respecting the Divine Qualities of Matter.
You have thrown out all your views loosely and at random, in order that it might not be apparent, by too close a proximity, how contrary they are to one another. I, however, mean to gather them together and compare them. You allege that motion in Matter is without regularity, and you go on to say that Matter aims at a shapeless condition, and then, in another passage, that it desires to be set in order by God. Does that, then, which affects to be without form, want to be put into shape? Or does that which wants to be put into shape, affect to be without form? You are unwilling that God should seem to be equal to Matter; and then again you say that it has a common condition with God. “For it is impossible,” you say, “if it has nothing in common with God, that it can be set in order by Him.” But if it had anything in common with God, it did not want to be set in order, being, forsooth, a part of the Deity through a community of condition; or else even God was susceptible of being set in order by Matter, by His having Himself something in common with it. And now you herein subject God to necessity, since there was in Matter something on account of which He gave it form. You make it, however, a common attribute of both of them, that they set themselves in motion by themselves, and that they are ever in motion. What less do you ascribe to Matter than to God? There will be found all through a fellowship of divinity in this freedom and perpetuity of motion.
Only in God motion is regular, in Matter irregular. In both, however, there is equally the attribute of Deity—both alike having free and eternal motion. At the same time, you assign more to Matter, to which belonged the privilege of thus moving itself in a way not allowed to God.

## Footnotes

* ↑ Dispersisti omnia.
* ↑ Inconditum.
* ↑ “Communionem.”
* ↑ Ornari: “to be adorned.”
* ↑ Ornari: “to be adorned.”
* ↑ Composite.
* ↑ Incondite.