OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# For the Term of His Natural Life/Epilogue
### Epilogue

At day-dawn the morning after the storm, the rays of the rising sun fell upon an object which floated on the surface of the water not far from where the schooner had foundered.
This object was a portion of the mainmast head of the Lady Franklin, and entangled in the rigging were two corpses—a man and a woman. The arms of the man were clasped round the body of the woman, and her head lay on his breast.
The Prison Island appeared but as a long low line on the distant horizon. The tempest was over. As the sun rose higher the air grew balmy, the ocean placid; and, golden in the rays of the new risen morning, the wreck and its burden drifted out to sea.
# Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus (First Edition, 1818)/Volume 1/Letter 3

LETTER III.
To Mrs. Saville, England.
July 7th, 17—.
MY DEAR SISTER,
I write a few lines in haste, to say that I am safe, and well advanced on my voyage. This letter will reach England by a merchant-man now on its homeward voyage from Archangel; more fortunate than I, who may not see my native land, perhaps, for many years. I am, however, in good spirits: my men are bold, and apparently firm of purpose; nor do the floating sheets of ice that continually pass us, ​indicating the dangers of the region towards which we are advancing, appear to dismay them. We have already reached a very high latitude; but it is the height of summer, and although not so warm as in England, the southern gales, which blow us speedily towards those shores which I so ardently desire to attain, breathe a degree of renovating warmth which I had not expected.
No incidents have hitherto befallen us, that would make a figure in a letter. One or two stiff gales, and the breaking of a mast, are accidents which experienced navigators scarcely remember to record; and I shall be well content, if nothing worse happen to us during our voyage.
Adieu, my dear Margaret. Be assured, that for my own sake, as well as your's, I will not rashly encounter ​danger. I will be cool, persevering, and prudent.
Remember me to all my English friends.
Most affectionately yours,
R. W.
# Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus (First Edition, 1818)/Volume 2

FRANKENSTEIN;
OR,
THE MODERN PROMETHEUS.
IN THREE VOLUMES.
Did I request thee, Maker, from my clay To mould me man? Did I solicit thee From darkness to promote me?—— Paradise Lost.
VOL. II.
London: PRINTED FOR LACKINGTON, HUGHES, HARDING, MAVOR, & JONES, FINSBURY SQUARE.
1818.
Printed by Macdonald and Son, Cloth Fair, London.
* Volume I
* Volume II
    Chapter I
    Chapter II
    Chapter III
    Chapter IV
    Chapter V
    Chapter VI
    Chapter VII
    Chapter VIII
    Chapter IX
* Volume III
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Familiar Colloquies/Editorial Note

EDITORIAL NOTE.
Published in 1733, and the performance of an eminent philologist, this Translation of the famous Familiar Colloquies still remains the only one which embraces the whole work, although small portions have been rendered into English by various writers both of the present and preceding centuries. The present Edition is printed almost exactly as it came from the Translator, and thus necessarily the phraseology bears in various respects features of another period than the present, but this drawback may be compensated for to some extent in the closeness of the rendering.
Regarding the book itself, it is unnecessary here to make any comment. Its very great popularity everywhere that the Latin language has been spoken or read, is sufficient evidence of the great interest attaching to the work. Either as descriptive of manners and opinions of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, or as a guide to the student of Colloquial Latin, there are few works that may be compared with it.
# Freedmen's Bureau

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Freedmen's Bureau."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Samuel Thomas, Mississippi Freedmen's Bureau Circular no. 2, 1866.
* The Freedmen's Bureau by W.E.B. DuBois, 1901.
* "Freedmen's Bureau," in The New International Encyclopædia, New York: Dodd, Mead and Co. (1906)
* "Freedmen's Bureau," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
# Freedman's Saving Trust Company v. Shepherd

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
127 U.S. 494
Freedman's Saving Trust Company v. Shepherd
[Statement of Case from pages 494-500 intentionally omitted]
Enoch Totten, for appellant, Freedman's Savings & Trust company.
M. F. Morris and H. H. Wells, for appellee John W. Thompson.
Wm. F. Mattingly and A. C. Bradley, for Alexander R. Shepherd.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Freedman v. Maryland

Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51 (1965), is a United States Supreme Court case that ended government-operated rating boards with a decision that a rating board could only approve a film and had no power to ban a film. The ruling also concluded that a rating board must either approve a film within a reasonable time, or go to court to stop a film from being shown in theatres. Other court cases determined that television stations are federally licensed, so local rating boards have no jurisdiction over films shown on television. When the movie industry set up its own rating system—the Motion Picture Association of America—most state and local boards ceased operating. Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Concurring Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
380 U.S. 51
Freedman v. Maryland
Argued: Nov. 19, 1964. --- Decided: March 1, 1965
Felix J. Bilgrey, New York City, for appellant.
Thomas B. Finan, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Freedman v. Maryland/Concurrence Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Douglas
* Wikipedia article
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, whom Mr. Justice BLACK joins, concurring.
On several occasions I have indicated my view that movies are entitled to the same degree and kind of protection under the First Amendment as other forms of expression. Superior Films v. Department of Education, 346 U.S. 587, 588, 74 S.Ct. 286, 98 L.Ed. 329; Kingsley International Pictures Corp. v. Regents, 360 U.S. 684, 697, 79 S.Ct. 1362, 1369, 3 L.Ed.2d 1512; Times Film Corp. v. City of Chicago, 365 U.S. 43, 78, 81 S.Ct. 391, 410, 5 L.Ed.2d 406. For the reasons there stated, I do not believe any form of censorship-no matter how speedy or prolonged it may be-is permissible. As I see it, a pictorial presentation occupies as preferred a position as any other form of expression. If censors are banned from the publishing business, from the pulpit, from the public platform-as they are-they should be banned from the theatre. I would not admit the censor even for the limited role accorded him in Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown, 354 U.S. 436, 77 S.Ct. 1325, 1 L.Ed.2d 1469. I adhere to my dissent in that case. Id., at 466-447, 77 S.Ct., at 1330-1331. Any authority to obtain a temporary injunction gives the State 'the paralyzing power of a censor.' Id., at 446, 77 S.Ct., at 1330. The regime of Kingsley Books 'substitutes punishment by contempt for punishment by jury trial.' Id., at 477, 77 S.Ct., at 1331. I would put an end to all forms and types of censorship and give full literal meaning to the command of the First Amendment.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Freedom

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Freedom."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, travel guide, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Freedom", a poem by John Barbour
* "Freedom", a poem by Ralph Waldo Emerson
* "Sonnet—Freedom," by Ferdinand de Gramont in A Sheaf Gleaned in French Fields, London: C. Kegan Paul & Co. (1876)
* "Freedom", a poem by Helen Hunt Jackson
* "FREEDOM!", by Adam Charles Kokesh
* “Freedom", by Nella Larsen
* "Freedom", a poem by Albert Libertad
* "Freedom", a poem by Lola Ridge
* "Freedom", a poem by Alfred Tennyson
# Fay v. Noia (372 U.S. 391)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Clark
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 391
Fay v. Noia
Argued: Jan. 7 and 8, 1963. --- Decided: March 18, 1963
[Syllabus from pages 391-394 intentionally omitted]
William I. Siegel, Brooklyn, N.Y., for petitioners.
Leon B. Polsky, New York City, for respondent.
Joseph J. Rose, Albany, N.Y., for State of New York, as amicus curiae.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fayolle v. Texas Pacific Railway Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
124 U.S. 519
Fayolle v. Texas Pacific Railway Company
This motion is granted. The decree was rendered November 12, 1883. An appeal was taken at the same time in open court, returnable to our October term, 1884, which ended May 4, 1885, but it was not docketed here until January 17, 1886. That was too late, as the appeal had become inoperative through the failure of the appellants to docket the case here at the return-term. Grigsby v. Purcell, 99 U.S. 505, and cases there cited; Killian v. Clark, 111 U.S. 784, 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 700; Caillot v. Deetken, 113 U.S.; 215, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 432. The excuse presented for the failure to docket in time is not sufficient to give the appellants the benefit of any exception to this rule, which was recognized in Grigsby v. Purcell, 507. Neither does the case come within that of Edwards U.S., 102 U.S. 575, because the transcript of the record was not lodged in the office of the clerk of this court until after the return-term of the appeal, and no attempt was made to get it upon the docket until another term had passed and still another had begun. Dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fear

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Fear."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Fear, a poem by Sara Teasdale.
* Fear, a short story by Achmed Abdullah.
* Fear, Collection of short stories by Edith Nesbit
# Fear No More the Heat o' the Sun

Song from Cymbeline, Act 4, scene 2.

### Versions in Cymbeline

See Cymbeline for list of editions.

### Other versions

* "Poem XL: Fidele" in the Golden Treasury of English Songs and Lyrics (ed.) by Francis Turner Palgrave (1861).
* "Fear No More the Heat o' th' Sun" in Shakespeare's Songs, (ed.) by Arthur Henry Bullen (1907).
* "Fidele" in the Oxford Book of English Verse 1250-1900 (ed.) by Arthur Quiller-Couch (1931).
* "Fidele" in the Oxford Book of English Verse 1250-1918 (ed.) by Arthur Quiller-Couch (1940).
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fayolle v. Texas Pacific Railway Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
124 U.S. 519
Fayolle v. Texas Pacific Railway Company
[Statement of Case from pages 519-522 intentionally omitted]
W. D. Davidge and William H. Trescott, for motion.
W. D. Shipman, opposed.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fayerweather v. Ritch

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
195 U.S. 276
Fayerweather v. Ritch
Argued: October 12, 13, 1904. --- Decided: November 28, 1904

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Guthrie v. White

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Guthrie Aſſignee verſus White.
A Certiorari was iſſued to John Culbertſon Eſq; one of the Juſtices for the county of Cheſter, to remove the proceedings in this cauſe; and the record being accordingly returned, it appeared that one Irwin, having maintained the Defendant's daughter for ſeveral weeks made out an account againſt him, and, after ſwearing to the truth and juſtice of its contents, he aſſigned all his right, title and intereſt therein to the Plaintiff. The debt being under ten pounds, the Plaintiff, in his own name, ſued the father before the Juſtice upon this aſſignment, and obtained a judgment and execution againſt him; although, as it was ſtated in the Defendant's depoſition, his daughter was of full age at the time of contracting the debt, and no aſſumption, upon his part, had been proved or ſuggeſted.
Bradford moved to reverſe the Judgment; 1ſt, on account of the general irregularity of the proceedings; and 2dly, becauſe an action could not be maintained, by the aſſignee of a ſimple contract debt, in his own name.
The Court conſidered the whole proceedings to have been irregular; but ſaid, that there could be no doubt of the ſufficiency of the ſecond reaſon alone, as a ground for ſetting them aſide. And the Judgment was accordingly reverſed.
# Gut v. The State

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
76 U.S. 35
Gut v. The State
ERROR to the Supreme Court of Minnesota. The case was thus:
A statute of Minnesota, in force in 1866, required that criminal causes should be tried in the county where the offences were committed. The offence charged against the defendant was committed in December of that year, in the county of Brown, in that State. At that time four other counties, which were unorganized, were attached to Brown County for judicial purposes. On the 9th of March, 1867, a statute was passed by the legislature of the State authorizing the judge of the District Court, in cases where one or more counties were attached to another county for judicial purposes, to order, whenever he should consider it to be in furtherance of justice, or for the public convenience, that the place of holding the court should be changed from the county then designated by law to one of the other counties thus attached.
Under this act the judge of the district embracing Brown County ordered that the place of holding the court should be changed from that county to the county of Redwood, within the same district, and the change was accordingly made. The court subsequently held its sessions in Redwood County, where the defendant, in September, 1867, was indicted for murder in the first degree. The plea of not guilty having been interposed the case was transferred, on his motion, to Nicollet County, in an adjoining district, where he was tried, convicted, and sentenced. On appeal to the Supreme Court of the State the judgment was affirmed, and the case was now brought to this court under the 25th section of the Judiciary Act.
Mr. E. M. Wilson, for the plaintiff in error, contended in this court, as it was also contended in the court below, that the act of Minnesota, under which the court was held in Redwood County, and the grand jury were summoned, was unconstitutional so far as it authorized an indictment or trial there of an offence previously committed in Brown County; that it was in effect an ex post facto law, and, therefore, within the inhibition of the Federal Constitution.
Mr. F. R. E. Cornell, Attorney-General of Minnesota, contra.
Mr. Justice FIELD, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court, as follows:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
353 U.S. 1
Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board
[Syllabus intentionally omitted]
Mr. Peter W. Billings, Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellant.
Mr. E. R. Callister, Atty. Gen., of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellee.
Mr. Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First and Last (Coates)

"Hope smiles a welcome, if no other smiles"
* "First and Last" from The Cosmopolitan (July 1894).
* "First and Last" from Poems (1898).
# From The Zenana and Minor Poems. A Memoir of L. E. L. By Emma Roberts

From
The Zenana
and Minor Poems
A Memoir of L. E. L.
by Emma Roberts
# From Us She wandered now a Year

From Us She wandered now a Year, Her tarrying, unknown, If Wilderness prevent her feet Or that Ethereal Zone
No eye hath seen and lived We ignorant must be — We only know what time of Year We took the Mystery.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Shut Out

SHUT OUT.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Sleep at Sea

SLEEP AT SEA.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Song ("She sat and sang alway")

SONG.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Sound Sleep

SOUND SLEEP.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Sister Maude

SISTER MAUDE.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Song ("When I am dead, my dearest")

SONG.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Rest

REST.
SONNET.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Remember

REMEMBER.
Sonnet.
# Goblin Market and Other Poems (1862)/Song ("Two doves upon the selfsame branch")

SONG.
# Gypsy Sorcery and Fortune Telling

* related portals: History of the Romanies.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
1891 book on the ritualistic practices of the Roma.
* The Origin of Witchcraft, Shamanism and Sorcery
* Charms and Conjurations to Cure the Disorders of Grown People
* Gypsy Conjurations and Exorcisms
* South Slavonian and other Gypsy Witch-lore
* Charms or Conjurations to Cure or Protect Animals
* Of Pregnancy and Charms
* The Recovery of Stolen Property, Love Charms
* Roumanian and Transylvanian Sorceries and Superstitions
* The Meetings of Witches
* Of the Haunts, Homes and Habits of Witches in the South Slavic Lands
* Gypsy Witchcraft--Magical Power and Fortune-telling
* Fortune-Telling (continued)
* Proverbs Referring to Witches, Gypsies and Fairies
* A Gypsy Magic Spell--The Great Secret
* Gypsy Amulets
* Gypsies, Toads and Toad-lore
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# George Nidiver

This traditional ballad was included in a collection by Ralph Waldo Emerson. He introduced it as follows: I am permitted to enrich my chapter by addition of an anecdote of pure courage from real life, as narrated in a ballad by a lady to whom all the particulars of the facts are exactly known.
    Men have done brave deeds,
    And bards have sung them well:
    I of good George Nidiver
    Now the tale will tell.
    In Californian mountains
    A hunter bold was he:
    Keen his eye and sure his aim
    As any you should see.
    A little Indian boy
    Followed him everywhere,
    Eager to share the hunter's joy,
    The hunter's meal to share.
    And when the bird or deer
    Fell by the hunter's skill,
    The boy was always near
    To help with right good will.
    One day as through the cleft
    Between two mountains steep,
    Shut in both right and left,
    Their questing way they keep,
    They see two grizzly bears
    With hunger fierce and fell
    Rush at them unawares
    Right down the narrow dell.
    The boy turned round with screams,
    And ran with terror wild;
    One of the pair of savage beasts
    Pursued the shrieking child.
    The hunter raised his gun, -
    He knew one charge was all, -
    And through the boy's pursuing foe
    He sent his only ball.
    The other on George Nidiver
    Came on with dreadful pace:
    The hunter stood unarmed,
    And met him face to face.
    I say unarmed he stood.
    Against those frightful paws
    The rifle butt, or club of wood,
    Could stand no more than straws.
    George Nidiver stood still
    And looked him in the face;
    The wild beast stopped amazed,
    Then came with slackening pace.
    Still firm the hunter stood,
    Although his heart beat high;
    Again the creature stopped,
    And gazed with wondering eye.
    The hunter met his gaze,
    Nor yet an inch gave way;
    The bear turned slowly round,
    And slowly moved away.
    What thoughts were in his mind
    It would be hard to spell:
    What thoughts were in George Nidiver
    I rather guess than tell.
    But sure that rifle's aim,
    Swift choice of generous part,
    Showed in its passing gleam
    The depths of a brave heart.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse