OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States v. Morgan (313 U.S. 409)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
313 U.S. 409
United States v. Morgan (313 U.S. 409)
Argued: April 10, 1941. --- Decided: May 26, 1941
Mr. Robert H. Jackson, Atty. Gen., for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 410-411 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Frederick H. Wood, of New York City, and John B. Gage, of Kansas City, Mo., for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from Page 412 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/12th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 37

Chap. XXXVII.—An Act making a further appropriation for the defence of our Maritime Frontier.
Appropriation of five hundred thousand dollars in addition to former appropriations.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the sum of five hundred thousand dollars be, and the same is hereby appropriated, in addition to the sums already appropriated, for the purposes of fortifying and defending the maritime frontier of the United States; and that the same be paid out of any monies in the treasury, not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, March 10, 1812.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/12th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 40

Chap. XL.—An Act respecting the enrolling and licensing of Steamboats.
Steamboats belonging to aliens, to be enrolled and licensed. Act of Feb. 18, 1793, ch. 8.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the passing of this act, a steamboat employed, or intended to be employed only in a river or bay of the United States, owned wholly or in part by an alien, resident within the United States, may, and shall be enrolled and licensed, as if the same belonged to a citizen of the United States, according to, and subject to all the conditions, limitations and provisions contained in the act, entituled “An act for enrolling and licensing ships or vessels to be employed in the coasting trade and fisheries, and for regulating the same,” except that, in such case, no oath or affirmation shall be required that the said boat belongs to a citizen or citizens of the United States.
Owners of such boats to give bonds, &c.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the owner or owners of such steamboat, upon application for enrolment or license, shall give bond to the collector of the district, to and for the use of the United States, in the penalty of one thousand dollars, with sufficient surety, conditioned, that the said boat shall not be employed in other waters than the rivers and bays of the United States.
Approved, March 12, 1812.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/12th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 34

Chap. XXXIV.—An Act to authorize the Secretary of the Treasury, under the direction of the President of the United States, to purchase of Winslow Lewis, his patent right to the new and improved method of lighting Lighthouses, and for other purposes.
Secretary of the Treasury authorized to purchase Winslow Lewis’ patent right for lighting lighthouses.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of the Treasury be, and he is hereby authorized and empowered, under the directions of the President of the United States, to purchase of Winslow Lewis, his patent right to the plan of lighting lighthouses, by reflecting and magnifying lanterns, if the same shall be proved to be a discovery made by him; and to contract with the said Winslow Lewis, for fitting up and keeping in repair, any or all the lighthouses in the United States or the territories thereof, upon the new and improved plan of the reflecting and magnifying lanterns; or to contract with the said Winslow Lewis, for such sum as he may think for the interest of the United States:The sum to be allowed for lighting not to exceed the annual appropriation for the last seven years. Provided, the sum to be allowed, shall not in any case annually exceed the appropriation made for supplying the lighthouse establishment with oil in any given year, which has passed for a term not exceeding seven years, the said Lewis covenanting, with sufficient sureties, to fit up and keep in repair all the lighthouses in the United States or territories thereof, on the new and improved plan of lighting lighthouses by reflecting and magnifying lanterns; and the same to furnish and keep in repair for a term of years not less than seven, at the sole expense of the said Winslow Lewis, and to deliver over at the expiration of the term aforesaid, all the lighthouses fitted up according to the new and improved plan, to the United States in good repair, he, the said Winslow Lewis, warranting the same to remain in good repair for seven years more, from and after the expiration of the said contract.
Appropriation.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That a sum not exceeding sixty thousand dollars be, and the same is hereby appropriated, out of any monies in the treasury not otherwise appropriated, to carry this law into effect.
Approved, March 2, 1812.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/12th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 35

Chap. XXXV.—An Act supplementary to “An act providing for the accommodation of the General Post-Office and Patent Office, and for other purposes.”
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Postmaster-General, under the direction of the President of the United States, be authorized ​Act of April 28, 1810, ch. 34. Postmaster-General, under direction of the President, authorize to repair and finish the Great Hotel for the accommodation of the post-office department and patent office. When these offices are to be removed.to repair and finish, in a suitable manner for the accommodation of the post-office department and the patent office, the two stories of building purchased for the government, by authority of the aforesaid act, being the first and second stories, including also sundry repairs on the outside and in the garret of said building, upon the principles stated in the report of the Postmaster-General, dated January fifteenth, one thousand eight hundred and twelve.
Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That as soon as the repairs can be properly made, and before the commencement of the next annual session of Congress, the general post-office and the city post-office shall be removed to said public building.
Appropriation.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That for the purposes of completing the aforesaid work, there be appropriated, from any monies in the treasury not otherwise appropriated, the sum of thirteen thousand two hundred and forty-seven dollars and sixty-one cents, including the sum of two thousand three hundred dollars, now in the treasury, and also the sum of one thousand three hundred and ninety-three dollars and seventy cents, now in the hands of Thomas Monroe, superintendent of the city of Washington, being unexpended balances of the sum of twenty thousand dollars, authorized by the act of April twenty-eighth, one thousand eight hundred and ten, to which this act is a supplement.
Approved, March 7, 1812.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/12th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 4

Chap. IV.—An Act extending the time for opening the several Land-offices established in the territory of Orleans.
Further time allowed for opening land-offices. Act of Feb. 15, 1811, ch. 14.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That so much of the sixth section of an act, entituled “An act providing for the final adjustment of claims to lands and for the sale of the public lands in the territories of Orleans and Louisiana, and to repeal the act passed for the same purpose and approved February sixteenth, one thousand eight hundred and eleven,” as directs that the several land-offices established in the territory of Orleans shall be opened on the first day of January and on the first day of February, one thousand eight hundred and twelve, be, and the same is hereby repealed.
Lands-offices to be opened on such days as may be designated by the President.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the said land-offices shall, respectively, be opened on such day or days as the President of the United States shall, by proclamation, designate for that purpose; and the public land shall, in every other respect, be offered for sale at the said offices in the same manner as is directed by the aforesaid act.
Approved, December 12, 1811.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/12th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 36

Chap. XXXVI.—An Act for the relief of the Board of Commissioners west of Pearl river.
Board of commissioners’, west of Pearl river, accounts to be settled and paid.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the proper accounting officers at the treasury be, and they are hereby directed to audit and settle the accounts of the board of commissioners west of Pearl river, in the Mississippi territory, and to allow each of them the sum of six dollars per day for every day’s actual attendance on the board, subsequent to the first day of April, one thousand eight hundred and six, except for the eighty-four days, already provided for.
Approved, March 10, 1812.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 2/12th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 39

Chap. XXXIX.—An Act to alter the time of holding the Circuit Courts of the United States at Knoxville, in the District of East Tennessee, in the state of Tennessee.
Act of March 22, 1808, ch. 38. Sessions of the circuit court changed to the second Monday in October, at Knoxville, in East Tennessee. 1807, ch. 16. 1831, ch. 1. Process, &c. returnable, &c. &c. accordingly.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That so much of the first section of an act, entituled “An act to amend an act entituled An act establishing circuit courts, and abridging the jurisdiction of the district courts of the districts of Kentucky, Tennessee, and Ohio,” passed on the twenty-second day of March, eighteen hundred and eight, as provides that the sessions of the said circuit courts shall be held at Knoxville, in East Tennessee, on the third Monday of October annually, shall be and is hereby repealed; and from and after the passing of this act, the said circuit courts shall be held at Knoxville, in the district of East Tennessee, on the second Monday in October, annually, and continue until all the business therein depending be disposed of; and that all actions, causes, pleas, processes and other proceedings relative to any cause, civil or criminal, which shall be returnable to, or depending in the said circuit court of the United States, to be held at Knoxville, on the third Monday of October next, shall be returned, and held, continued to, and be proceeded upon on the second Monday in October next, in the same manner they would have been if this change had not been made.
Approved, March 10, 1812.
# Vizagapatam/Gazetteer/Koraput Taluk

KORAPUT TALUK.
Koraput taluk forms the portion of the 3,000 feet plateau just above, and east of, the town of Jeypore. It is perhaps the barest of vegetation of any part of that plateau, there being no forest anywhere in it except along the edge of the ghát to Jeypore. The landscape consists of an undulating expanse of red and brown earth, with laterite cropping out here and there and coarse grass growing in the hollows, thickly dotted with small red hills covered to their very tops with permanent dry cultivation, between which meander small rivulets the beds of which have been levelled and planted with paddy. Three-quarters of the people speak Uriya and a fifth talk Khond. After Vizagapatam, the taluk contains more Christians than any other. The head-quarters is —
Koraput, the residence of the Divisional Officer, the Superintendent of Police, and his Assistant (who live together in one large bungalow begun in 1873) and of the deputy tahsildar. The place contains the lines and hospital of a body of reserve police and a large sub-jail capable of holding 87 persons, and is a station of the Schleswig-Holstein Lutheran Mission. It is a neatly-kept village with a population of 1,560 persons, and lies on the main road which runs from Jeypore to the plains by the Pottangi ghát (see p. 139). The head-quarters of the officers in charge of Jeypore was transferred hither from Jeypore town in 1870, as it was fondly hoped that a place standing so high and so clear of jungle would be free from the malaria which infested Jeypore. Curiously enough, these expectations have by no means been fulfilled and the station is not healthy, the south-west monsoon driving through it with great violence and malaria (even the black-water variety) attacking residents. The latter is usually ascribed to the breeding ground for mosquitoes which is afforded by a nullah fed from springs which runs through the place, and in 1904-05, in the hope of removing this superfluous moisture, eucalyptus trees were planted round about the nullah and the latter was revetted throughout with stone. The trees all died, and so far no noticeable improvement has resulted from the revetment.
# United Zinc Chemical Company v. Britt

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
258 U.S. 268
United Zinc Chemical Company v. Britt
Argued: March 13, 1922. --- Decided: March 27, 1922
Messrs. Henry D. Ashley and Wm. S. Gilbert, both of Kansas City, Mo., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 268-272 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. F. J. Oyler, of Iola, Kan., and Fred Robertson, of Kansas City, Kan., for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 272-274 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Transportation Union v. State Bar of Michigan/Dissent White

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Harlan
* Dissenting Opinion White
United States Supreme Court
401 U.S. 576
United Transportation Union v. State Bar of Michigan
Argued: Jan. 20, 1971. --- Decided: April 5, 1971
Mr. Justice WHITE, with whom Mr. Justice BLACKMUN joins, concurring in part and dissenting in part.
The first provision in the decree prohibiting the union from giving or furnishing legal advice to its members or their families is overbroad in light of United Mine Workers v. Illinois Bar Assn., 389 U.S. 217, 88 S.Ct. 353, 19 L.Ed.2d 426 (1967), and should be narrowed to prohibit only legal advice by nonlawyers. Also, I agree with the Court that the portion of the decree forbidding the setting of fees by unionlawyer agreement cannot stand. Otherwise, however, I do not read the decree as being inconsistent with our prior cases and I would not now extend them to set aside this decree in its entirety.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United Surety Company v. American Fruit Product Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
238 U.S. 140
United Surety Company v. American Fruit Product Company
Argued: May 12, 1915. --- Decided: June 14, 1915
Messrs. Wade H. Ellis, R. Golden Donaldson, Charles Cowles Tucher, and Abner H. Ferguson for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. George E. Hamilton, John W. Yerkes, and John J. Hamilton for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Company

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Company."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Company (242 U.S. 190)
* United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Company (254 U.S. 251)
* United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Company (256 U.S. 51)
* United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Company (288 U.S. 490)
* United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Company (311 U.S. 317)
See also Northern Pacific Railway Company v. United States.
# United States v. Northern Pacific Railroad Company (193 U.S. 1)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States, Northern Pacific Railway.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
193 U.S. 1
United States v. Northern Pacific Railroad Company
Argued: January 5, 1904. --- Decided: February 23, 1904
Mr. Charles W. Russell for petitioner.
This was a suit brought by the United States against the Northern Pacific Railroad Company and the Northern Pacific Railway Company to cancel patents issued in May, 1895, by the United States to the railroad company, to whose rights the railway company had succeeded. The lands are situated in the state of Washington, north of Portland, in the state of Oregon. The case was heard in the circuit court on facts stipulated, and the bill dismissed, whereupon it was carried to the circuit court of appeals for the ninth circuit, and that court certified to this court certain questions on which it desired instructions. The whole record and cause were then required to be sent up for consideration.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 2-4 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. C. W. Bunn and James B. Kerr for respondents.
Statement by Mr. Chief Justice Fuller:
Mr. Chief Justice Fuller delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Northern Pacific Railroad Company (177 U.S. 435)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States, Northern Pacific Railway.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
177 U.S. 435
United States v. Northern Pacific Railroad Company
Argued: January 26, 29, 1900. --- Decided: April 16, 1900
Messrs.C. W. Russell, M. C. Bright, and Crownhart & Foley for appellant.
Messrs. J. B. Kerr and C. W. Bunn for appellees.
Statement by Mr. Justice Shiras: of the United States for the district of Minnesota
In July, 1898, the United States, by the Attorney General, filed in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Minnesota Pacific Railroad Company and others. The object of the suit was to procure the cancelation and annulment of a certain patent granted to the Northern Pacific Railroad Company by the United States on April 22, 1895, for a tract of land lying and being more than 10 miles east of Duluth, in the state of Minnesota, and which patent was alleged by the bill to have been inadvertently and mistakenly issued. The case was disposed of on bill, answer, and a stipulation of facts. The circuit court dismissed the case for want of equity, and the cause was taken on appeal to the circuit court of appeals for the eighth circuit, where the decree of the circuit court was, on July 10, 1899, affirmed. An appeal was thereupon allowed to this court.
Mr. Justice Shiras delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Northern Pacific Railroad Company (152 U.S. 284)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States, Northern Pacific Railway.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
152 U.S. 284
United States v. Northern Pacific Railroad Company
This was an action brought by the United States against the Northern Pacific Railroad Company, the Willamette Steam Mills Lumbering & Manufacturing Company, Julius Ordway, George W. Weidler, and Aaron Kinney, to recover the value of lumber alleged to have been unlawfully cut from public lands. The judgment below was for defendants on the ground that the lands in question had ceased to be public lands, (41 Fed. 842,) and the United States sued out this writ of error.
Sol. Gen. Maxwell, for the United States.
James McNaught and F. M. Dudley, for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Company (254 U.S. 251)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
254 U.S. 251
United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Company (254 U.S. 251)
Argued: Nov. 11 and 12, 1920. --- Decided: Dec 6, 1920
Assistant Attorney General Adams, for the United States.
Messrs. D. F. Lyons and Charles W. Bunn, both of St. Paul, Minn., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Views in Suffolk, Norfolk, and Northamptonshire

Illustrated by James Sargant Storer and John Greig
The Triangular Tower, Shooters Hill.
This far seen monumental tow'r Records th' achievements of the brave. And Angrias subjugate pow'r Who plunder'd on the eastern wave
Views in Norfolk, Suffolk and Northamptonshire. ILLUSTRATIVE of the Works of ROBERT BLOOMFIELD
The fields his Study, Nature was his Book. LONDON Published by Verner, Hood, and Sharpe, Poultry: & J. Stoner & J. Greig, Chapel Street; Pentonville
H. Brougham. Esq. M.P. Published by Geo. Smeeton, 17, S$^{t.}$ Martin's Lane
VIEWS
IN
SUFFOLK, NORFOLK,
AND
NORTHAMPTONSHIRE;
ILLUSTRATIVE OF
The Works
OF
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD;
ACCOMPANIED WITH
DESCRIPTIONS:
TO WHICH IS ANNEXED,
A MEMOIR OF THE POET'S LIFE,
BY
E. W. BRAYLEY.
LONDON:
PUBLISHED BY VERNOR, HOOD, AND SHARPE, POULTRY; DARTON AND HARVEY, GRACECHURCH STREET; AND J. STORER AND J. GREIG, ENGRAVERS, CHAPEL STREET, PENTONVILLE.
1818.
Printed by W. CLOWES, Northumberland-court, Strand.
ADVERTISEMENT.
THE very flattering reception which the Illustrations of Cowper and Burns have experienced from the Public, encourages a hope that the same liberal patronage will be extended to the present undertaking; and though we are aware that it is a maxim generally received, that living authors are of comparatively small consideration, we are happy to know that the world have, in the instance of "The Farmer's Boy," conferred on its author that generous countenance and support which perhaps equal merit has in former times sighed for in vain.
To Capel Lofft, Esq., of Troston Hall, we are much indebted for his useful communications. Mrs. Lathbury, of Levermere Magna; the Rev. Robert Fellowes, of Fakenham; and Mr. Robert Bloomfield; have equal claims upon our gratitude.
J. Storer and J. Greig.