OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States v. California (297 U.S. 175)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
297 U.S. 175
United States v. California
Argued: Jan. 16, 17, 1936. --- Decided: Feb 3, 1936
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Golden W. Bell, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 176-177 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Ralph Marron, of San Francisco, Cal., for the State of California.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 178-180 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. California (332 U.S. 19)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
332 U.S. 19
United States v. California (332 U.S. 19)
Argued: March 13, 14, 1947. --- Decided: June 23, 1947
Rehearing Denied Oct. 13, 1947. See 68 S.Ct. 37.
Order and Decree Oct. 27, 1947. See 68 S.Ct. 20.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 19-21 intentionally omitted]
Tom C. Clark, Atty. Gen., and Arnold Raum, of Washington, D.C., for complainant.
Fred H. Howser, of San Francisco, Cal., and William W. Clary, of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant.
Leander I. Shelley, of New York City, for American Association of Port Authorities, as amicus curiae, by special leave of Court.
Price Daniel, of Austin, Tex., for National Association of Attorneys General, as amicus curiae, by special leave of Court.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Gill

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
87 U.S. 517
United States v. Gill

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Gibson/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
33 U.S. 494
United States v. Gibson
This was a grant made by governor Grant, of East Florida, for ten thousand acres of land whilst that province was under the dominion of Great Britain, and another grant made by governor Tomyn, to Francis P. Fatio, for seven hundred and sixty acres. The first tract was conveyed by regular deeds to the ancestor of the petitioners.
The same questions are involved as in the case of the heirs of Francis P. Fatio. It is therefore considered by the court, that the decree of the superior court of East Florida be affirmed.
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the superior court for the eastern district of Florida, and was argued by counsel; on consideration whereof, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by this court, that the decree of the said superior court in this cause be, and the same is hereby affirmed in all respects.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Gilbert Associates

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
345 U.S. 361
United States v. Gilbert Associates
Argued: March 11, 1953. --- Decided: April 6, 1953
Mr. Harry Baum, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
No appearance for respondent.
Mr. Justice MINTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Giles

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Giles."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Giles (13 U.S. 212)
* United States v. Giles (300 U.S. 41)
# United States v. Giles (300 U.S. 41)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
300 U.S. 41
United States v. Giles (300 U.S. 41)
Argued: Jan. 13, 1937. --- Decided: Feb 1, 1937
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Brien McMahon, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.
Mr. Will A. Morriss, of San Antonio, Tex., for respondent.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Gibson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
33 U.S. 494
United States v. Gibson
APPEAL from the superior court of East Florida.
The case was submitted by Mr Call, for the United States; and by Mr White, for the appellees.
Mr Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Giles (13 U.S. 212)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
13 U.S. 212
United States v. Giles

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Code/Title 42/Chapter 85/Section 7423

§ 7423. Standards of performance for new stationary sources CAA § 123

## (a) Heights in excess of good engineering practice; other dispersion techniques

The degree of emission limitation required for control of any air pollutant under an applicable implementation plan under this subchapter shall not be affected in any manner by—
    (1) so much of the stack height of any source as exceeds good engineering practice (as determined under regulations promulgated by the Administrator), or
    (2) any other dispersion technique.
The preceding sentence shall not apply with respect to stack heights in existence before December 31, 1970, or dispersion techniques implemented before such date. In establishing an emission limitation for coal-fired steam electric generating units which are subject to the provisions of section 7418 of this title and which commenced operation before July 1, 1957, the effect of the entire stack height of stacks for which a construction contract was awarded before February 8, 1974, may be taken into account.

## (b) Dispersion technique

For the purpose of this section, the term “dispersion technique” includes any intermittent or supplemental control of air pollutants varying with atmospheric conditions.

## (c) Regulations; good engineering practice

Not later than six months after August 7, 1977, the Administrator, shall after notice and opportunity for public hearing, promulgate regulations to carry out this section. For purposes of this section, good engineering practice means, with respect to stack heights, the height necessary to insure that emissions from the stack do not result in excessive concentrations of any air pollutant in the immediate vicinity of the source as a result of atmospheric downwash, eddies and wakes which may be created by the source itself, nearby structures or nearby terrain obstacles (as determined by the Administrator). For purposes of this section such height shall not exceed two and a half times the height of such source unless the owner or operator of the source demonstrates, after notice and opportunity for public hearing, to the satisfaction of the Administrator, that a greater height is necessary as provided under the preceding sentence. In no event may the Administrator prohibit any increase in any stack height or restrict in any manner the stack height of any source.
# United States Code/Title 42/Chapter 85/Section 7421

§ 7421. Consultation CAA § 121
In carrying out the requirements of this chapter requiring applicable implementation plans to contain—
    (1) any transportation controls, air quality maintenance plan requirements or preconstruction review of direct sources of air pollution, or
    (2) any measure referred to—
       (A) in part D of this subchapter (pertaining to nonattainment requirements), or
       (B) in part C of this subchapter (pertaining to prevention of significant deterioration),
    and in carrying out the requirements of section 7413 (d) of this title (relating to certain enforcement orders), the State shall provide a satisfactory process of consultation with general purpose local governments, designated organizations of elected officials of local governments and any Federal land manager having authority over Federal land to which the State plan applies, effective with respect to any such requirement which is adopted more than one year after August 7, 1977, as part of such plan. Such process shall be in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Administrator to assure adequate consultation. The Administrator shall update as necessary the original regulations required and promulgated under this section (as in effect immediately before November 15, 1990) to ensure adequate consultation. Only a general purpose unit of local government, regional agency, or council of governments adversely affected by action of the Administrator approving any portion of a plan referred to in this subsection may petition for judicial review of such action on the basis of a violation of the requirements of this section.
# United States Code/Title 42/Chapter 85/Section 7424

§ 7424. Assurance of adequacy of State plans CAA § 124

## (a) State review of implementation plans which relate to major fuel burning sources

As expeditiously as practicable but not later than one year after August 7, 1977, each State shall review the provisions of its implementation plan which relate to major fuel burning sources and shall determine—
    (1) the extent to which compliance with requirements of such plan is dependent upon the use by major fuel burning stationary sources of petroleum products or natural gas,
    (2) the extent to which such plan may reasonably be anticipated to be inadequate to meet the requirements of this chapter in such State on a reliable and long-term basis by reason of its dependence upon the use of such fuels, and
    (3) the extent to which compliance with the requirements of such plan is dependent upon use of coal or coal derivatives which is not locally or regionally available.
Each State shall submit the results of its review and its determination under this paragraph to the Administrator promptly upon completion thereof.

## (b) Plan revision

    (1) Not later than eighteen months after August 7, 1977, the Administrator shall review the submissions of the States under subsection (a) of this section and shall require each State to revise its plan if, in the judgment of the Administrator, such plan revision is necessary to assure that such plan will be adequate to assure compliance with the requirements of this chapter in such State on a reliable and long-term basis, taking into account the actual or potential prohibitions on use of petroleum products or natural gas, or both, under any other authority of law.
    (2) Before requiring a plan revision under this subsection, with respect to any State the Administrator shall take into account the report of the review conducted by such State under paragraph (1) and shall consult with the Governor of the State respecting such required revision.
# United States Code/Title 42/Chapter 85/Section 7426

§ 7426. Interstate pollution abatement CAA § 126

## (a) Written notice to all nearby States

Each applicable implementation plan shall—
    (1) require each major proposed new (or modified) source—
       (A) subject to part C of this subchapter (relating to significant deterioration of air quality) or
       (B) which may significantly contribute to levels of air pollution in excess of the national ambient air quality standards in any air quality control region outside the State in which such source intends to locate (or make such modification),
    to provide written notice to all nearby States the air pollution levels of which may be affected by such source at least sixty days prior to the date on which commencement of construction is to be permitted by the State providing notice, and
    (2) identify all major existing stationary sources which may have the impact described in paragraph (1) with respect to new or modified sources and provide notice to all nearby States of the identity of such sources not later than three months after August 7, 1977.

## (b) Petition for finding that major sources emit or would emit prohibited air pollutants

Any State or political subdivision may petition the Administrator for a finding that any major source or group of stationary sources emits or would emit any air pollutant in violation of the prohibition of section 7410 (a)(2)(D)(ii) of this title or this section. Within 60 days after receipt of any petition under this subsection and after public hearing, the Administrator shall make such a finding or deny the petition.

## (c) Violations; allowable continued operation

Notwithstanding any permit which may have been granted by the State in which the source is located (or intends to locate), it shall be a violation of this section and the applicable implementation plan in such State—
    (1) for any major proposed new (or modified) source with respect to which a finding has been made under subsection (b) of this section to be constructed or to operate in violation of the prohibition of section 7410 (a)(2)(D)(ii) of this title or this section, or
    (2) for any major existing source to operate more than three months after such finding has been made with respect to it.
The Administrator may permit the continued operation of a source referred to in paragraph (2) beyond the expiration of such three-month period if such source complies with such emission limitations and compliance schedules (containing increments of progress) as may be provided by the Administrator to bring about compliance with the requirements contained in section 7410 (a)(2)(D)(ii) of this title or this section as expeditiously as practicable, but in no case later than three years after the date of such finding. Nothing in the preceding sentence shall be construed to preclude any such source from being eligible for an enforcement order under section 7413 (d) of this title after the expiration of such period during which the Administrator has permitted continuous operation.
# United States Code/Title 42/Chapter 85/Section 7417

§ 7417. Advisory committees CAA § 117

## (a) Establishment; membership

In order to obtain assistance in the development and implementation of the purposes of this chapter including air quality criteria, recommended control techniques, standards, research and development, and to encourage the continued efforts on the part of industry to improve air quality and to develop economically feasible methods for the control and abatement of air pollution, the Administrator shall from time to time establish advisory committees. Committee members shall include, but not be limited to, persons who are knowledgeable concerning air quality from the standpoint of health, welfare, economics or technology.

## (b) Compensation

The members of any other advisory committees appointed pursuant to this chapter who are not officers or employees of the United States while attending conferences or meetings or while otherwise serving at the request of the Administrator, shall be entitled to receive compensation at a rate to be fixed by the Administrator, but not exceeding $100 per diem, including traveltime, and while away from their homes or regular places of business they may be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by section 5703 of title 5 for persons in the Government service employed intermittently.

## (c)  1 Consultations by Administrator

Prior to—
    (1) issuing criteria for an air pollutant under section 7408 (a)(2) of this title,
    (2) publishing any list under section 7411 (b)(1)(A) or section 7412 (b)(1)(A) of this title,
    (3) publishing any standard under section 7411 or section 7412 of this title, or
    (4) publishing any regulation under section 7521 (a) of this title,
the Administrator shall, to the maximum extent practicable within the time provided, consult with appropriate advisory committees, independence experts, and Federal departments and agencies.
# Tragical ballad of Lord John's murder/Lord John's Murder

The date is estimated
LORD JOHN'S MURDER.
Lord John stands in his stable door, Says he, I will gae ride; His lady, in her bigly bower, Desired him to bide.
"How can I bide, how can I bide? How shall I bide wi' thee? When I ha'o kill'd your ae brother, You hae nae mair but he."
"If ye ha'e kill'd my ae brother, Alas! and wae is me; If ye be well yoursel', my love, The less matter will it be!
"Ye'll do you to yon bigly bower, And take a silent sleep, And I'll watch in my highest tower, Your fair body to keep.'
She has shut her bigly bower, All wi' a silver pin; And done her to the highest tower, To watch that nane come in.
​But as she looked round about, To see what she could see, There she saw nine armed knights Come riding o'er the lea.
"God make you safe and free, lady, God make you safe and free! Did you see a bludy knight Come riding o'er the lea?"
"O what like was his hawk, his hawk? And what like was his hound? If his steed has ridden well, He's pass'd fair Scotland's strand.
"Come in, come in, gude gentlemen, And take white bread and wine; And aye the better ye'll pursue, The lighter that ye dine."
"We thank you for your bread, lady, We thank you for your wine; And I would gi'e my lands sae broad, Your fair body were mine."
She has gane to her bigly bower, Her ain gude lord to meet; A trusty brand he quickly drew, Ga'e her a wound sae deep.
"What harm, my lord, provokes thine ire, To wreak itself on me, When thus I strove to save thy life, Yet served for sic a fee?"
​"Ohon, alas! my lady gay, To come so hastilie; I thought it was my deadly foe, Ye had trysted into me.
"O live, O live, my gay lady, The space o' ae half hour, And nae a leech in a' the land But I'se bring to your bower."
"How can I live, how shall I live? How can I live for thee? Ye see my blude rins on the ground My heart's blude by your knee!
"O take to flight, and flee, my love, O take to flight and flee! I wouldna wish your fair body For to get harm for me."
"Ae foot I winna flee, lady, Ae foot I winna flee; I've dune the crime worthy o' death, It's right that I should die.
"O deal ye well at my love's lyke, The beer, but an' the wine; For, ere the morn, at this same time, Ye'll deal the same at mine.
# Tragical ballad of Lord John's murder

The date is estimated
THE
TRAGICAL BALLAD OF
LORD JOHN'S MURDER;
TOGETHER WITH
THE CRUEL BROTHER.
GLASGOW PRINTED FOR THE BOOKSELLERS. 79.
* Lord John's Murder
* The Cruel Brother
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/16th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 126

Chap. CXXVI.—An Act to impose a new tonnage duty on French ships and vessels.
Act of March 3, 1815, ch. 76. Act of March 3, 1821, ch. 46. Act of May 6, 1822, ch. 56. Act of March 3, 1823, ch. 24. Eighteen dollars per ton on French ships or vessels, in lieu of present duty.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in lieu of the tonnage duty now paid on French ships or vessels, there shall be paid a duty of eighteen dollars per ton, on all French ships or vessels which shall be entered in the United States, any act to the contrary notwithstanding: Provided, however, That nothing contained in this act, shall be so construed as to prevent the extension of the provisions of the act, entitled “An act to repeal so much of the several acts imposing duties on the tonnage of ships and vessels, and on goods, wares, and merchandise, imported into the United States, as imposes a discriminating duty on tonnage between foreign vessels and vessels of the United States, and between the goods imported into the United States in foreign vessels, and vessels of the United States,” to French ships or vessels, and the goods imported therein, whenever the government of France shall accede to the provisions of the act above referred to.
The duty to be collected according to act of 2d March, 1799, ch. 22.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the tonnage duty laid, and directed to be paid, by this act, shall be collected and paid according to the provisions of the act, entitled “An act to regulate the collection of duties on imports and tonnage,” passed the second day of March, one thousand seven hundred and ninety-nine.
This act in force from 1st July, 1820.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That this act shall commence, and be in force, from and after the first day of July, one thousand eight hundred and twenty.
Approved, May 15, 1820.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/16th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 117

Chap. CXVII.—An Act for the relief of persons holding confirmed unlocated claims for lands in the state of Illinois.
Persons holding confirmed unlocated claims for land within the tract reserved by 3d section of act of 16th April, 1814, &c. Act of 1814, ch. 120. Claims to be receivable, &c. Act of 1816, ch. 101.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That all persons lawfully holding confirmed unlocated claims for land within the tract reserved by the third section of the act, entitled “An act confirming certain claims to land in the Illinois territory and providing for their location,” passed the sixteenth day of April, in the year one thousand eight hundred and fourteen, be allowed until the first day of November, one thousand eight hundred and twenty, to register the same: and the said claims shall be receivable in payment for public lands within the said reserved tract, conformably with the provisions of the said act, and of the act, entitled “An act making further provision for settling claims to land in the territory of Illinois,” passed the twenty-sixth day of April, one thousand eight hundred and sixteen, at any time before the first day of November, one thousand eight hundred and twenty.
Approved, May 15, 1820.