OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 31/Section 316

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 316. Certificate of patentability, unpatentability, and claim cancellation
(a) In General.—In an inter partes reexamination proceeding under this chapter, when the time for appeal has expired or any appeal proceeding has terminated, the Director shall issue and publish a certificate canceling any claim of the patent finally determined to be unpatentable, confirming any claim of the patent determined to be patentable, and incorporating in the patent any proposed amended or new claim determined to be patentable.
(b) Amended or New Claim.—Any proposed amended or new claim determined to be patentable and incorporated into a patent following an inter partes reexamination proceeding shall have the same effect as that specified in section 252 of this title for reissued patents on the right of any person who made, purchased, or used within the United States, or imported into the United States, anything patented by such proposed amended or new claim, or who made substantial preparation therefor, prior to issuance of a certificate under the provisions of subsection (a) of this section.

## Source

(Added Pub. L. 106-113, div. B, Sec. 1000(a)(9) [title IV, Sec. 4604(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A-569; amended Pub. L. 107-273, div. C, title III, Sec. 13202(c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1902.)

## Amendments
### 2002

Pub. L. 107-273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106-113, which enacted this section.
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 31/Section 317

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 317. Inter partes reexamination prohibited
(a) Order for Reexamination.—Notwithstanding any provision of this chapter, once an order for inter partes reexamination of a patent has been issued under section 313, neither the third-party requester nor its privies, may file a subsequent request for inter partes reexamination of the patent until an inter partes reexamination certificate is issued and published under section 316, unless authorized by the Director.
(b) Final Decision.—Once a final decision has been entered against a party in a civil action arising in whole or in part under section 1338 of title 28, that the party has not sustained its burden of proving the invalidity of any patent claim in suit or if a final decision in an inter partes reexamination proceeding instituted by a third-party requester is favorable to the patentability of any original or proposed amended or new claim of the patent, then neither that party nor its privies may thereafter request an inter partes reexamination of any such patent claim on the basis of issues which that party or its privies raised or could have raised in such civil action or inter partes reexamination proceeding, and an inter partes reexamination requested by that party or its privies on the basis of such issues may not thereafter be maintained by the Office, notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter. This subsection does not prevent the assertion of invalidity based on newly discovered prior art unavailable to the third-party requester and the Patent and Trademark Office at the time of the inter partes reexamination proceedings.

## Source

(Added Pub. L. 106-113, div. B, Sec. 1000(a)(9) [title IV, Sec. 4604(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A-570; amended Pub. L. 107-273, div. C, title III, Sec. 13202(a)(5), (c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1901, 1902.)

## Amendments
### 2002

Pub. L. 107-273, Sec. 13202(c)(1), made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106-113, which enacted this section.
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107-273, Sec. 13202(a)(5)(A), substituted “third-party requester nor its privies” for “patent owner nor the third-party requester, if any, nor privies of either”.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107-273, Sec. 13202(a)(5)(B), struck out “United States Code,” after “title 28,”.

## Note

* 1 2 So in original. The comma probably should not appear.
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 36

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Chapter 36. International Stage
* Section 361. Receiving Office
* Section 362. International Searching Authority and International Preliminary Examining Authority
* Section 363. International application designating the United States: Effect
* Section 364. International stage: Procedure
* Section 365. Right of priority; benefit of the filing date of a prior application
* Section 366. Withdrawn international application
* Section 367. Actions of other authorities: Review
* Section 368. Secrecy of certain inventions; filing international applications in foreign countries

## Amendments
### 1986

Pub. L. 99-616, Sec. 3, Nov. 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 3485, amended item 362 generally.
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 31/Section 312

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 312. Determination of issue by Director
(a) Reexamination.—Not later than 3 months after the filing of a request for inter partes reexamination under section 311, the Director shall determine whether a substantial new question of patentability affecting any claim of the patent concerned is raised by the request, with or without consideration of other patents or printed publications. The existence of a substantial new question of patentability is not precluded by the fact that a patent or printed publication was previously cited by or to the Office or considered by the Office.
(b) Record.—A record of the Director’s determination under subsection (a) shall be placed in the official file of the patent, and a copy shall be promptly given or mailed to the owner of record of the patent and to the third-party requester.
(c) Final Decision.—A determination by the Director under subsection (a) shall be final and non-appealable. Upon a determination that no substantial new question of patentability has been raised, the Director may refund a portion of the inter partes reexamination fee required under section 311.

## Source

(Added Pub. L. 106-113, div. B, Sec. 1000(a)(9) [title IV, Sec. 4604(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A-568; amended Pub. L. 107-273, div. C, title III, Secs. 13105(a), 13202(a)(2), (c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1900-1902.)

## Amendments
### 2002

Pub. L. 107-273, Sec. 13202(c)(1), made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106-113, which enacted this section.
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107-273, Sec. 13202(a)(2)(A), struck out second sentence which read as follows: “On the Director’s initiative, and at any time, the Director may determine whether a substantial new question of patentability is raised by patents and publications.”
Pub. L. 107-273, Sec. 13105(a), inserted at end “The existence of a substantial new question of patentability is not precluded by the fact that a patent or printed publication was previously cited by or to the Office or considered by the Office.”
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107-273, Sec. 13202(a)(2)(B), struck out “, if any” after “third-party requester”.

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by section 13105(a) of Pub. L. 107-273 applicable with respect to any determination of the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office that is made on or after Nov. 2, 2002, see section 13105(b) of Pub. L. 107-273, set out as a note under section 303 of this title.
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 31/Section 314

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 314. Conduct of inter partes reexamination proceedings
(a) In General.—Except as otherwise provided in this section, reexamination shall be conducted according to the procedures established for initial examination under the provisions of sections 132 and 133. In any inter partes reexamination proceeding under this chapter, the patent owner shall be permitted to propose any amendment to the patent and a new claim or claims, except that no proposed amended or new claim enlarging the scope of the claims of the patent shall be permitted.
(b) Response.—(1) With the exception of the inter partes reexamination request, any document filed by either the patent owner or the third-party requester shall be served on the other party. In addition, the Office shall send to the third-party requester a copy of any communication sent by the Office to the patent owner concerning the patent subject to the inter partes reexamination proceeding.
    (2) Each time that the patent owner files a response to an action on the merits from the Patent and Trademark Office, the third-party requester shall have one opportunity to file written comments addressing issues raised by the action of the Office or the patent owner’s response thereto, if those written comments are received by the Office within 30 days after the date of service of the patent owner’s response.
(c) Special Dispatch.—Unless otherwise provided by the Director for good cause, all inter partes reexamination proceedings under this section, including any appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, shall be conducted with special dispatch within the Office.

## Source

(Added Pub. L. 106-113, div. B, Sec. 1000(a)(9) [title IV, Sec. 4604(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A-568; amended Pub. L. 107-273, div. C, title III, Sec. 13202(a)(3), (c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1901, 1902.)

## Amendments
### 2002

Pub. L. 107-273, Sec. 13202(c)(1), made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106-113, which enacted this section.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107-273, Sec. 13202(a)(3), redesignated par. (2) as (1), substituted “the Office shall send to the third-party requester a copy” for “the third-party requester shall receive a copy”, redesignated par. (3) as (2), and struck out former par. (1) which read as follows: “This subsection shall apply to any inter partes reexamination proceeding in which the order for inter partes reexamination is based upon a request by a third-party requester.”
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 31/Section 318

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 318. Stay of litigation
Once an order for inter partes reexamination of a patent has been issued under section 313, the patent owner may obtain a stay of any pending litigation which involves an issue of patentability of any claims of the patent which are the subject of the inter partes reexamination order, unless the court before which such litigation is pending determines that a stay would not serve the interests of justice.

## Source

(Added Pub. L. 106-113, div. B, Sec. 1000(a)(9) [title IV, Sec. 4604(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A-570; amended Pub. L. 107-273, div. C, title III, Sec. 13202(c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1902.)

## Amendments
### 2002

Pub. L. 107-273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106-113, which enacted this section.
# United States Code/Title 35/Chapter 31/Section 313

From the U.S. House of Representatives.
Section 313. Inter partes reexamination order by Director
If, in a determination made under section 312(a), the Director finds that a substantial new question of patentability affecting a claim of a patent is raised, the determination shall include an order for inter partes reexamination of the patent for resolution of the question. The order may be accompanied by the initial action of the Patent and Trademark Office on the merits of the inter partes reexamination conducted in accordance with section 314.

## Source

(Added Pub. L. 106-113, div. B, Sec. 1000(a)(9) [title IV, Sec. 4604(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A-568; amended Pub. L. 107-273, div. C, title III, Sec. 13202(c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1902.)

## Amendments
### 2002

Pub. L. 107-273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106-113, which enacted this section.
# Treaty of Versailles

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons gallery, Commons category, quotes, Wikidata item.
Signed at Versailles (France) on 28 June 1919; came into force on 10 January 1920. Although the United States is a signatory, the treaty was never ratified by the U.S. Senate: see the Treaty of Peace between Germany and the United States of America, signed at Berlin on August 25, 1921. Official texts in English: [1919] UKTS 4 (Cmd. 153); [1920] ATS 1.
TREATY OF PEACE
BETWEEN THE
ALLIED AND ASSOCIATED POWERS AND GERMANY
AND
PROTOCOL
SIGNED AT VERSAILLES, JUNE 28, 1919
PRINTED BY ORDER OF PARLIAMENT.
OTTAWA
J. de LABROQUERIE TACHÉ PRINTER TO THE KING'S MOST EXCELLENT MAJESTY
1919
[No. 41—41e]
* Preamble
* Part I. The Covenant of the League of Nations (Arts. 1–26)
* Part II. Boundaries of Germany (Arts. 27–30)
* Part III. Political Clauses for Europe (Arts. 31–117)
* Part IV. German Rights and Interests outside Germany (Arts. 118–158)
* Part V. Military, Naval and Air Clauses (Arts. 159–213)
* Part VI. Prisoners of War and Graves (Arts. 214–226)
* Part VII. Penalties (Arts. 227–230)
* Part VIII. Reparation (Arts. 231–247)
* Part IX. Financial Clauses (Arts. 248–263)
* Part X. Economic Clauses (Arts. 264–312)
* Part XI. Aerial Navigation (Arts. 313–320)
* Part XII. Ports, Waterways and Railways (Arts. 321–386)
* Part XIII. Labour (Arts. 387–427)
* Part XIV. Guarantees (Arts. 428–433)
* Part XV. Miscellaneous Provisions (Arts. 434–440)
* Signatures
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
Sessional Paper No. 41. — Treaty of Peace between the Allied and Associated Powers and Germany, signed at Versailles, June 28, 1919.
Sessional Paper No. 41a. — Protocol signed at Versailles, June 28, 1919.
Sessional Paper No. 41b. — Agreement with regard to the Military Occupation of the Territories of the Rhine.
Sessional Paper No. 41c. — Letter to the President of the German Delegation covering the reply of the Allied and Associated Powers.
Sessional Paper No. 41d. — Reply of the Allied and Associated Powers to the observations of the German Delegation on the conditions of Peace.
Sessional Paper No. 41e. — Treaty between the United States of America, the British Empire, France, Italy, Japan and Poland, signed at Versailles, June 28, 1919.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Treaty of Utrecht

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Treaty of Utrecht."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
The Treaties of Utrecht were signed in 1713. They were a set of treaties signed between the contenders in the War of the Spanish Succession
* Netherlands and Great Britain (30 January, 1713)
* Holy Roman Empire and Prussia (2 April, 1713)
* France and Great Britain (April 11, 1713)
** Peace and Friendship
** Navigation and Commerce
* France and Portugal (April 11, 1713)
* France and Prussia (April 11, 1713)
* France and Savoy (April 11, 1713)
* France and the Netherlands (April 11, 1713)
* Spain and Great Britain (13 July, 1713)
** Peace and Friendship
** Navigation and Commerce
* Spain and Savoy (13 July, 1713)
# Treaty of Trianon/Part 7

Part VII. Penalties.
Article 157.
The Hungarian Government recognises the right of the Allied and Associated Powers to bring before military tribunals persons accused of having committed acts in violation of the laws and customs of war. Such persons shall, if found guilty, be sentenced to punishments laid down by law. This provision will apply notwithstanding any proceedings or prosecutions before a tribunal in Hungary or in the territory of her allies.
The Hungarian Government shall hand over to the Allied and Associated Powers, or to such one of them as shall so request, all persons accused of having committed an act in violation of the laws and customs of war, who are specified either by name or by the rank, office or employment which they held under the Hungarian authorities.
Article 158.
Persons guilty of criminal acts against the nationals of one of the Allied and Associated Powers will be brought before the military tribunals of that Power.
Persons guilty of criminal acts against the nationals of more than one of the Allied and Associated Powers will be brought before military tribunals composed of members of the military tribunals of the Powers concerned.
In every case the accused will be entitled to name his own counsel.
Article 159.
The Hungarian Government undertakes to furnish all documents and information of every kind the production of which may be considered necessary to ensure the full knowledge of the incriminating acts, the discovery of offenders and the just appreciation of responsibility.
Article 160.
The provisions of Articles 157 to 159 apply similarly to the Governments of the States to which territory belonging to the former Austro-Hungarian Monarchy has been assigned, in so far as concerns persons accused of having committed acts contrary to the laws and customs of war who are in the territory or at the disposal of the said States.
If the persons in question have acquired the nationality of one of the said States, the Government of such State undertakes to take, at the request of the Power concerned and in agreement with it, all the measures necessary to ensure the prosecution and punishment of such persons.
# Treaty of Trianon/Preamble

​The United States of America, The British Empire, France, Italy and Japan,
These Powers being described in the present Treaty as the Principal Allied and Associated Powers,
Belgium, China, Cuba, Greece, Nicaragua, Panama, Poland, Portugal, Roumania, The Serb-Croat-Slovene State, Siam, and Czecho-Slovakia,
These Powers constituting with the Principal Powers mentioned above the Allied and Associated Powers,
of the one part;
And Hungary,
of the other part;
Whereas on the request of the former Imperial and Royal Austro- Hungarian Government an Armistice was granted to Austria-Hungary on November 3, 1918, by the Principal Allied and Associated Powers, and completed as regards Hungary by the Military Convention of November 13, 1918, in order that a Treaty of Peace might be concluded, and
Whereas the Allied and Associated Powers are equally desirous that the war in which certain among them were successively involved, directly or indirectly, against Austria-Hungary, and which originated in the declaration of war by the former Imperial and Royal Austro-Hungarian Government on July 28, 1914, against Serbia, and in the hostilities conducted by Germany in alliance with Austria-Hungary, should be replaced by a firm, just, and durable Peace, and
Whereas the former Austro-Hungarian Monarchy has now ceased to exist, and has been replaced in Hungary by a national Hungarian Government:
For this purpose the High Contracting Parties have appointed as their Plenipotentiaries:
The President of the United States of America:
His Majesty the King of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland of the British Dominions Beyond the Seas, Emperor of India:
for the Dominion of Canada:
for the Commonwealth of Australia:
for the Dominion of New Zealand:
for the Union of South Africa:
for India:
The President of the French Republic:
His Majesty the King of Italy:
His Majesty the Emperor of Japan:
His Majesty the King of the Belgians:
The President of the Chinese Republic:
The President of the Cuban Republic:
His Majesty the King of the Hellenes:
The President of the Republic of Panama:
The President of the Polish Republic:
The President of the Portuguese Republic:
His Majesty the King of Roumania:
His Majesty the King of the Serbs, the Croats, and the Slovenes:
His Majesty the King of Siam:
The President of the Czecho-Slovak Republic:
Hungary:
Who, having communicated their full powers found in good and due form, have agreed as follows:
From the coming into force of the present Treaty the state of war will terminate.
From that moment and subject to the provisions of the present Treaty official relations will exist between the Allied and Associated Powers and Hungary.
# There It Is

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "There It Is."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "There It Is!" (1917), a poem by John Cowper Powys
* There It Is (1928), a short film directed by Harold L. Muller and Charles Raymond Bowers
# There Was a Little Girl

This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
There was a little girl,  Who had a little curl, Right in the middle of her forehead. When she was good She was very very good,  And when she was bad she was horrid.
One day she went upstairs, When her parents, unawares,  In the kitchen were occupied with meals, And she stood upon her head In her little trundle-bed,  And then began hooraying with her heels.
Her mother heard the noise, And she thought it was the boys  A-playing at a combat in the attic; But when she climbed the stair, And found Jemima there,  She took and she did spank her most emphatic.
# There Was an Old Woman Who Lived in a Shoe

"There Was an Old Woman Who Lived in a Shoe" is a popular English language nursery rhyme, with a Roud Folk Song Index number of 19132. Debates over its meaning and origin have largely centered on attempts to match the old woman with historical female figures who have had large families, although King George II (1683–1760) has also been proposed as the rhyme's subject. Warning: template has been deprecated.
* "There was an old woman who lived in a shoe" in A Book of Nursery Songs and Rhymes by Sabine Baring-Gould (1895)
* "There was an old woman who lived in a shoe" in A Book of Nursery Rhymes by Charles Welsh (1901)
* "There was an old woman who lived in a shoe" in The Nursery Rhymes of Mother Goose by Arthur Rackham (St. Nicholas, 1914)

### See also

* "You know the old woman who lived in a shoe?" in Appley Dapply's Nursery Rhymes by Beatrix Potter (1917)
# There Was a Man in Our Town

"There Was a Man in Our Town", also known as "The Wondrous Wise Man" or "There Was a Man in Thessaly" is an English nursery rhyme. Its Roud Folk Song Index number is 15749.
* "A Man so Wise" in Tommy Thumb's Pretty Song Book by Nurse Lovechild (1744)
* "There was a man in our town" in A Book of Nursery Rhymes by Charles Welsh (1901)
* "The Man in Our Town" in The Real Mother Goose by Blanche Fisher Wright (1916)
# There are sounds in the dark Roncesvalles

* There are sounds in the Dark Roncesvalles, in National Lyrics, and Songs for Music (Songs of Spain), 1834.
* There are sounds in the dark Roncesvalles, originally in A Collection of Peninsular Melodies, 1830 but taken here fron The Poems of Felicia Hemans, 1872 edition.