OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Jesus Christ the Apple Tree

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
also known as Christ Compared to an Apple Tree, is a commonly used title for a British poem beginning The tree of life my soul hath seen. It appeared in the September 1761 issue of The Spiritual Magazine published in London by J. Fuller and in the annual compilation Divine Moral and Historical Miscellanies in Prose and Verse, Vol. 1, in December 1761. The author is listed as R.H., believed to be Rev. Richard Hutchins, a Calvinist Baptist clergyman then at Long Buckby in Northamptonshire, England. It has been set to music by a number of composers, including Jeremiah Ingalls (1764–1838) and Elizabeth Poston (1905–1987). Because of its popularity in New England psalmody, the text has sometimes been attributed to an anonymous early American poet or to the hymn compiler Rev. Joshua Smith. The version below shows the poem as printed in the 1803 edition of Divine Hymns.
The tree of life my soul hath seen, Laden with fruit, and always green; The trees of nature fruitless be, Compar'd with Christ the Appletree.
This beauty doth all things excel, By faith I know, but ne'er can tell The glory which I now can see, In Jesus Christ the Appletree.
For happiness I long have sought, And pleasure dearly I have bought; I miss'd of all; but now I see 'Tis found in Christ the Appletree.
I'm weary'd with my former toil— Here I will sit and rest awhile, Under the shadow I will be, Of Jesus Christ the Appletree.
With great delight I'll make my stay, There's none shall fright my soul away; Among the sons of men I see There's none like Christ the Appletree.
I'll sit and eat this fruit divine, It cheers my heart like spirit'al wine; And now this fruit is sweet to me, That grows on Christ the Appletree.
This fruit doth make my soul to thrive, It keeps my dying faith alive; Which makes my soul in haste to be With Jesus Christ the Appletree.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jesus does not treat

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
From Notebook c.1808-1811 p.72.

#### Edited text:

84
Jesus does not trea[t part of leaf cut away] he makes a Wide distinction between the Sheep & the Goats; consequently he is Not Charitable.
________________________________________

#### The original text:

Jesus does not treat [?all ?alike] because he makes a Wide Distinction between the Sheep & the Goats consequently he is Not Charitable
[Paper cut away]
________________________________________

## Notes

* ↑ "Blake Complete Writings", ed. Geoffrey Keynes, pub. OUP 1966/85, p. 556.
* ↑ "The Complete Poetry & Prose of William Blake", ed. by David V. Erdman, Anchor Books, 1988, p. 695.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jesus Calls Us, O'er the Tumult

"Jesus Calls Us, O'er the Tumult" is usually sung to the tune Galilee by William Herbert Jude
* "Jesus Calls Us, O'er the Tumult" in Hymns of the Church Universal, 1885
* "Jesus Calls Us, O'er the Tumult" in The Army and Navy Hymnal, 1920
# Jesus Christ Is Risen Today

* related portals: Hymns.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
This translation first appeared in Lyra Davidica (1708) alongside the anonymous tune Easter Hymn, with which it is closely associated. A heavily edited version, with a complete rewrite of verses 2 and 3, appeared in John Arnold's The Compleat Psalmodist (1749); Arnold's revision is the text commonly used today.
Charles Wesley wrote a poem in 1739 based on this hymn called Christ the Lord Is Risen Today, which is now also a popular hymn.
* "The Resurrection" in Lyra Davidica (1708).
* "For Easter-Sunday" in Hymns for the Amusement of Children (1791).
# Jesus, whose blood so freely streamed

This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
JEHOVAM-SHALEM, The LORD send peace by William Cowper
    Jesus, whose blood so freely streamed
    To satisfy the laws demand;
    By thee from guilt and wrath redeemed,
    Before the Father's face I stand.
    To reconcile offending man,
    Make Justice drop her angry rod;
    What creature could have formed the plan,
    Or who fulfil it but a God?
    No drop remains of all the curse;
    For wretches who deserved the whole;
    No arrows dipped in wrath to pierce
    The guilty, but returning soul.
    Peace by such means co dearly bought,
    What rebel could have hoped to see?
    Peace, by his injured sovereign wrought,
    His Sovereign fastened to the tree.
    Now, LORD, thy feeble worm prepare!
    For strife with earth and hell begins;
    Confirm and gird me for the war,
    They hate the soul that hates his sins.
    Let them in horrid league agree!
    They may assault, they may distress;
    But cannot quench thy love to me,
    Nor rob me of the LORD my peace.
# Jesus Calls Us, O'er the Tumult (Rylands)

* related portals: Hymns.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Office hymn for the feast of St. Andrew
    Jesus calls us o'er the tumult
    Of our life's wild restless sea;
    Day by day his clear voice soundeth,
    Saying, "Christian, follow me."
    So of old St. Andrew heard it
    By the Galilean lake,
    Turned from home, and toil, and kindred,
    Leaving all for his dear sake.
    Jesus calls us from the worship
    Of the vain world's golden store,
    From each idol that would keep us,
    Saying, "Christian, love me more."
    In our joys and in our sorrows,
    Days of toil and hours of ease,
    Still he calls, in cares and pleasures,
    "Christian, love me more than these."
    Jesus calls us: by Thy mercies,
    Saviour, may we hear thy call!
    Give our hearts to thine obedience,
    Serve and love thee best of all.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jesus Christ, the Lord's anointed

On one throne shall be seven eyes by John Newton
    Jesus Christ, the Lord's anointed,
    Who his blood for sinners spilt;
    Is the Stone by God appointed,
    And the church is on him built:
    He delivers all who trust him from their guilt.
    Many eyes at once are fixed
    On a person so divine;
    Love, with aweful justice mixed,
    In his great redemption shine:
    Mighty JESUS! give me leave to call thee mine.
    By the Father's eye approved,
    Lo, a voice is heard from heav'n,
    "Sinners, this is my Beloved,
    For your ransom freely given:
    All offences, for his sake, shall be forgiven."
    Angels with their eyes pursued him,
    When he left his glorious throne;
    With astonishment they viewed him
    Put the form of servant on:
    Angels worshipped him who was on earth unknown.
    Satan and his host amazed,
    Saw this stone in Zion laid;
    Jesus, though to death abased,
    Bruised the subtle serpent's head:
    When to save us, on the cross his blood he shed.
    When a guilty sinner sees him,
    While he looks his soul is healed;
    Soon this sight from anguish frees him,
    And imparts a pardon sealed:
    May this Savior be to all our hearts revealed!
    With desire and admiration,
    All his blood-bought flock behold;
    Him who wrought out their salvation,
    And enclosed them in his fold:
    Yet their warmest love, and praises, are too cold.
    By the eye of carnal reason
    Many view him with disdain;
    How will they abide the season
    When he'll come with all his train:
    To escape him then they'll wish, but wish in vain.
    How their hearts will melt and tremble
    When they hear his aweful voice;
    But his saints he'll then assemble,
    As his portion and his choice;
    And receive them to his everlasting joys.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# In the Cage (London: Martin Secker, 1919)

* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
* Chapter VII
* Chapter VIII
* Chapter IX
* Chapter X
* Chapter XI
* Chapter XII
* Chapter XIII
* Chapter XIV
* Chapter XV
* Chapter XVI
* Chapter XVII
* Chapter XVIII
* Chapter XIX
* Chapter XX
* Chapter XXI
* Chapter XXII
* Chapter XXIII
* Chapter XXIV
* Chapter XXV
* Chapter XXVI
* Chapter XXVII
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jefferson v. Fink

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
247 U.S. 288
Jefferson v. Fink
Argued: March 22 and 25, 1918. --- Decided: June 3, 1918
Messrs. John T. Hays, of Hobart, Okl., James M. Hays, of Okmulgee, Okl., and Lewis C. Lawson, of Holdenville, Okl., for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. George S. Ramsey, of Muskogee, Okl., for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice VAN DE ANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jefferson v. Hackney

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
397 U.S. 821
Jefferson v. Hackney
Ed J. Polk and Carl Rachlin, for appellants.
Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Pat Bailey, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., and W. O. Shultz II, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jefferson v. Hackney/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
397 U.S. 821
Jefferson v. Hackney
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas for further consideration in light of Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397, 90 S.Ct. 1207, 25 L.Ed.2d 442.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jefferson Warehouse Cold Storage Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 525
Jefferson Warehouse Cold Storage Company v. United States
James W. Wrape, James N. Clay III and Richard A. Bishop, for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Guilfoyle, Alan S. Rosenthal and Pauline B. Heller, for the United States.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jefferson v. Driver

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
117 U.S. 272
Jefferson v. Driver
Argued: March 15, 1886. ---
John J. Hornor, J. C. Tappan, D. E. Myers, and W. M. Sneed, for appellants.
E. F. Adams, for appellee.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jefferson Warehouse Cold Storage Company v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 525
Jefferson Warehouse Cold Storage Company v. United States
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice BLACK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. Zipes

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Blackmun

## Dissenting Opinion

    Marshall
United States Supreme Court
491 U.S. 754
Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. Zipes
No. 88-608 Argued: April 25, 1989. --- Decided: June 22, 1989
Syllabus
After protracted litigation, respondents, a class of female flight attendants alleging that Trans World Airlines' policy of dismissing flight attendants who became mothers constituted sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, entered into a settlement agreement with TWA in which the airline agreed, inter alia, to credit class members with full company and union "competitive" seniority. At this point, petitioner, the collective-bargaining agent for TWA flight attendants, intervened in the lawsuit on behalf of incumbent flight attendants who would be adversely affected by the conferral of the seniority, challenging the settlement agreement on the grounds that (1) the court lacked jurisdiction to award equitable relief to one of the subclasses of respondents, and (2) the terms of the settlement would violate the existing collective-bargaining agreement. After this challenge was rejected, respondents petitioned the District Court for an award of attorney's fees against petitioner under § 706(k) of the Act. The court awarded fees against petitioner, and the Court of Appeals affirmed.
Held: District courts may award Title VII attorney's fees against those who are not charged with Title VII violations but intervene to protect their own rights only where the intervention is frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation. Assessing fees against blameless intervenors is not essential to § 706(k)'s central purpose of providing victims of wrongful discrimination an incentive to file suit. The prospect of uncompensated fees in litigation against such persons exists in any event, since they may choose to attack the decree collaterally instead of intervening-an undesirable result that the rule respondents urge would foster. While petitioner's advocacy of its members' bargained-for rights was not the specific type of conduct § 706(k) was intended to encourage, neither was it conduct that the statute aimed to deter. Pp. 758-766.
846 F.2d 434 (CA 7 1988), reve sed and remanded.
SCALIA, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which REHNQUIST, C.J., and WHITE, O'CONNOR, and KENNEDY, JJ., joined. BLACKMUN, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, post, p. 766. MARSHALL, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which BRENNAN, J., joined, post, p. 770. STEVENS, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Steven A. Fehr, for petitioner.
Aram A. Hartunian, Chicago, Ill., for respondents.
Justice SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Independent Petroleum Workers of America, Inc. v. American Oil Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
379 U.S. 130
Independent Petroleum Workers of America, Inc. v. American Oil Company
See 379 U.S. 985, 85 S.Ct. 639.
David E. Feller, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Frederic D. Anderson, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent.
On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Independent Petroleum Workers of America, Inc. v. American Oil Company/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
379 U.S. 130
Independent Petroleum Workers of America, Inc. v. American Oil Company
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Independent School-Dist Ackley Hardin County Iowa v. Hall

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
106 U.S. 428
Independent School-Dist Ackley Hardin County Iowa v. Hall
Galusha Parsons, for plaintiff in error.
A. T. Britton and Walter H. Smith, for defendant in error.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Lady Susan/Letter IX

Mrs. Johnson to Lady S. Vernon
Edward Street.
My dearest Friend,—I congratulate you on Mr. De Courcy's arrival, and I advise you by all means to marry him; his father's estate is, we know, considerable, and I believe certainly entailed. Sir Reginald is very infirm, and not likely to stand in your way long. I hear the young man well spoken of; and though no one can really deserve you, my dearest Susan, Mr. De Courcy may be worth having. Mainwaring will storm of course, but you easily pacify him; besides, the most scrupulous point of honour could not require you to wait for HIS emancipation. I have seen Sir James; he came to town for a few days last week, and called several times in Edward Street. I talked to him about you and your daughter, and he is so far from having forgotten you, that I am sure he would marry either of you with pleasure. I gave him hopes of Frederica's relenting, and told him a great deal of her improvements. I scolded him for making love to Maria Mainwaring; he protested that he had been only in joke, and we both laughed heartily at her disappointment; and, in short, were very agreeable. He is as silly as ever.
Yours faithfully,
Alicia.
# Lady Susan/Letter XI

Mrs. Vernon to Lady De Courcy
Churchhill.
I really grow quite uneasy, my dearest mother, about Reginald, from witnessing the very rapid increase of Lady Susan's influence. They are now on terms of the most particular friendship, frequently engaged in long conversations together; and she has contrived by the most artful coquetry to subdue his judgment to her own purposes. It is impossible to see the intimacy between them so very soon established without some alarm, though I can hardly suppose that Lady Susan's plans extend to marriage. I wish you could get Reginald home again on any plausible pretence; he is not at all disposed to leave us, and I have given him as many hints of my father's precarious state of health as common decency will allow me to do in my own house. Her power over him must now be boundless, as she has entirely effaced all his former ill-opinion, and persuaded him not merely to forget but to justify her conduct. Mr. Smith's account of her proceedings at Langford, where he accused her of having made Mr. Mainwaring and a young man engaged to Miss Mainwaring distractedly in love with her, which Reginald firmly believed when he came here, is now, he is persuaded, only a scandalous invention. He has told me so with a warmth of manner which spoke his regret at having believed the contrary himself. How sincerely do I grieve that she ever entered this house! I always looked forward to her coming with uneasiness; but very far was it from originating in anxiety for Reginald. I expected a most disagreeable companion for myself, but could not imagine that my brother would be in the smallest danger of being captivated by a woman with whose principles he was so well acquainted, and whose character he so heartily despised. If you can get him away it will be a good thing.
Yours, etc.,
Catherine Vernon.
# Lady Susan/Letter III

Mrs. Vernon to Lady De Courcy
Churchhill.
My dear Mother,—I am very sorry to tell you that it will not be in our power to keep our promise of spending our Christmas with you; and we are prevented that happiness by a circumstance which is not likely to make us any amends. Lady Susan, in a letter to her brother-in-law, has declared her intention of visiting us almost immediately; and as such a visit is in all probability merely an affair of convenience, it is impossible to conjecture its length. I was by no means prepared for such an event, nor can I now account for her ladyship's conduct; Langford appeared so exactly the place for her in every respect, as well from the elegant and expensive style of living there, as from her particular attachment to Mr. Mainwaring, that I was very far from expecting so speedy a distinction, though I always imagined from her increasing friendship for us since her husband's death that we should, at some future period, be obliged to receive her. Mr. Vernon, I think, was a great deal too kind to her when he was in Staffordshire; her behaviour to him, independent of her general character, has been so inexcusably artful and ungenerous since our marriage was first in agitation that no one less amiable and mild than himself could have overlooked it all; and though, as his brother's widow, and in narrow circumstances, it was proper to render her pecuniary assistance, I cannot help thinking his pressing invitation to her to visit us at Churchhill perfectly unnecessary. Disposed, however, as he always is to think the best of everyone, her display of grief, and professions of regret, and general resolutions of prudence, were sufficient to soften his heart and make him really confide in her sincerity; but, as for myself, I am still unconvinced, and plausibly as her ladyship has now written, I cannot make up my mind till I better understand her real meaning in coming to us. You may guess, therefore, my dear madam, with what feelings I look forward to her arrival. She will have occasion for all those attractive powers for which she is celebrated to gain any share of my regard; and I shall certainly endeavour to guard myself against their influence, if not accompanied by something more substantial. She expresses a most eager desire of being acquainted with me, and makes very gracious mention of my children but I am not quite weak enough to suppose a woman who has behaved with inattention, if not with unkindness, to her own child, should be attached to any of mine. Miss Vernon is to be placed at a school in London before her mother comes to us which I am glad of, for her sake and my own. It must be to her advantage to be separated from her mother, and a girl of sixteen who has received so wretched an education, could not be a very desirable companion here. Reginald has long wished, I know, to see the captivating Lady Susan, and we shall depend on his joining our party soon. I am glad to hear that my father continues so well; and am, with best love, etc.,
Catherine Vernon.