OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Tongues of Flame

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Tongues of Flame."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Tongues of Flame (1924), a novel by Peter Clark MacFarlane
* Tongues of Flame (1934), a novel by Ernest Lawton Thurston

## See also

* Tongues of Fire
# Tongues of Flame (MacFarlane)

Tongues of Flame
By Peter Clark MacFarlane Author of "Man's Country", etc.
Illustrations by Walt Louderback
Cosmopolitan Book Corporation New YorkMCMXXIV
Copyright, 1923, 1924, by Cosmopolitan Book Corporation, New York. All rights reserved, including that of translation into foreign languages, including the Scandinavian.
Printed in the United States of America
The Illustrations By Walt Louderback
* Chapter 1
* Chapter 2
* Chapter 3
* Chapter 4
* Chapter 5
* Chapter 6
* Chapter 7
* Chapter 8
* Chapter 9
* Chapter 10
* Chapter 11
* Chapter 12
* Chapter 13
* Chapter 14
* Chapter 15
* Chapter 16
* Chapter 17
* Chapter 18
* Chapter 19
* Chapter 20
* Chapter 21
* Chapter 22
* Chapter 23
* Chapter 24
* Chapter 25
* Chapter 26
* Chapter 27
* Chapter 28
* Chapter 29
* Chapter 30
* Chapter 31
* Chapter 32
* Chapter 33
* Chapter 34
* Chapter 35
* Chapter 36
* Chapter 37
* Chapter 38
* Chapter 39
* Chapter 40
* Chapter 41
* Chapter 42
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1924, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 99 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Unfortunate

* "Unfortunate" from 1914 and other poems (1915)
* "Unfortunate" from The Collected Poems of Rupert Brooke (1915)
# Ungar v. Sarafite/Dissent Goldberg

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Harlan
* Dissenting Opinions Douglas Goldberg
United States Supreme Court
376 U.S. 575
Ungar v. Sarafite
Argued: Feb. 24, 1964. --- Decided: March 30, 1964
Mr. Justice GOLDBERG, with whom Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice DOUGLAS join, dissenting.
I agree with my Brother DOUGLAS that due process of law requires that this contempt be tried before a different judge.
This Court has recognized that the power of a judge to impose punishment for criminal contempt without notice or hearing is:
'capable of grave abuses, and for that reason (the Court has never given any) encouragement to its expansion beyond the suppression and punishment of the court-disrupting misconduct which alone justified its exercise.' In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 274, 68 S.Ct. 499, 508, 92 L.Ed. 682.
The Court has also 'marked the limits of contempt authority in general as being 'the least possible power adequate to the end proposed." Ibid., quoting Anderson v. Dunn, 6 Wheat. 204, 231, 5 L.Ed. 242.
I would hold, therefore, that the Constitution forbids a judge to impose punishment for such contempt without notice or hearing, except when (1) the contempt creates such "an open threat to the orderly procedure of the court * * * (that if) not instantly suppressed and punished, demoralization of the court's authority will follow," In re Oliver, supra, at 275 of 333 U.S., at 508 of 68 S.Ct., 92 L.Ed. 682, quoting Cooke v. United States, 267 U.S. 517, 536, 45 S.Ct. 390, 394, 69 L.Ed. 767, and when (2) 'no explanation could mitigate (contemner's) offence, or disprove the fact that he had committed such contempt of (the court's) authority and dignity as deserved instant punishment.' Ex parte Terry, 128 U.S. 289, 310, 9 S.Ct. 77, 81, 32 L.Ed. 405.
The power to punish in so summary a fashion is, as the New York Court of Appeals recognized, fraught with danger, particularly when the alleged contempt consists of a charge of wrongdoing against the very person sitting in judgment of the contempt.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS has convincingly demonstrated that the contempt charged here was not such an open threat to the orderly procedure of the court as to necessitate instant punishment, that an explanation or the introduction of evidence could have mitigated or disproved the offense, and that it consisted essentially of a charge of wrongdoing against the very person sitting in judgment of the contempt.
I conclude, therefore, that this contempt could not constitutionally have been tried summarily, and that it should have been tried before a different judge.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ungar v. Sarafite/Concurrence Harlan

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Harlan
* Dissenting Opinions Douglas Goldberg
United States Supreme Court
376 U.S. 575
Ungar v. Sarafite
Argued: Feb. 24, 1964. --- Decided: March 30, 1964
Mr. Justice HARLAN, concurring.
I agree with and join the opinion of the Court, but wish to add that the contempt procedure employed by Judge Sarafite accorded Ungar more than his due under Sacher v. United States, 343 U.S. 1, 72 ,S.Ct. 451, 96 L.Ed. 717. In light of that case it is clear that Judge Sarafite, so far as the Federal Constitution is concerned, could have proceeded at the close of the main trial to hold Ungar in contempt without any hearing at all. The fact that the contempt adjudication followed a five-day notice given Ungar two days after the close of the trial cannot, as a constitutional matter, well be deemed to have extinguished the judge's power to proceed summarily.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, with whom Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice GOLDBERG concur, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ungar v. Sarafite

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Harlan

## Dissenting Opinions

    Douglas
    Goldberg
United States Supreme Court
376 U.S. 575
Ungar v. Sarafite
Argued: Feb. 24, 1964. --- Decided: March 30, 1964
See 377 U.S. 925, 84 S.Ct. 1218.
Osmond K. Fraenkel and Emanuel Redfield, New York City, for appellant.
H. Richard Uviller, New York City, for appellee.
Mr. Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Theses Presented to the Second World Congress of the Communist International

THESES
PRESENTED TO THE SECOND WORLD CONGRESS OF THE COMMUNIST INTERNATIONAL
(Petrograd—Moscow July 1920).
EDITIONS of the Communist International Petrograd, Smolny, 1920
page
THESES
PRESENTED TO THE SECOND WORLD CONGRESS OF THE COMMUNIST INTERNATIONAL
(Petrograd—Moscow July 1920).
EDITIONS
of the Communist International Petrograd, Smolny, 1920
page
First State Printing Office
page
INDEX
page
50 r.
This work was published in 1920 and is anonymous or pseudonymous due to unknown authorship. It is in the public domain in the United States as well as countries and areas where the copyright terms of anonymous or pseudonymous works are 103 years or less since publication.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Underwood v. Gerber

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
149 U.S. 224
Underwood v. Gerber
James A. Hudson and Livingston Gifford, for appellants.
A. v. Briesen, for appellees.
Mr. Justice BLATCHFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Undertaking Given by Certain German Emissaries to the Allied High Commands

This is an agreement, signed by Generaloberst Alfred Jodl, for the highest ranking German commanders to arrive at a designated time and place in order to ratify the act of unconditional surrender.
UNDERTAKING
GIVEN BY CERTAIN GERMAN EMISSARIES
TO THE ALLIED HIGH COMMANDS
It is agreed by the German emissaries undersigned that the following German officers will arrive at a place and time designated by the Supreme Commander, Allied Expeditionary Force, and the Soviet High Command prepared, with plenary powers, to execute a formal ratification on behalf of the German High Command of this act of Unconditional Surrender of the German armed forces.
Chief of the High Command
Commander-in-Chief of the Army
Commander-in-Chief of the Navy
Commander-in-Chief of the Air Forces.
SIGNED
Jodl
Representing the German High Command.
DATED 0241 7th May 1945
Rheims, France
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Underwood Typewriter Company v. Chamberlain

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
254 U.S. 113
Underwood Typewriter Company v. Chamberlain
Argued: Oct. 13 and 14, 1920. --- Decided: Nov 15, 1920
Messrs. Arthur M. Marsh, of Bridgeport, Conn., and Arthur L. Shipman, of Hartford, Conn., for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 114-116 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. James E. Cooper, of New Britain, Conn., and Hugh M. Alcorn, of Hartford, Conn., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Underwood v. Dugan

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
139 U.S. 380
Underwood v. Dugan
W. Hallett Phillips, for appellants.
Sawnie Robertson and W. O. Davis, for appellees.
BREWER, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Reports/Volume 48

7 How.[ard], ( 12 L.Ed. )
* 48 U.S. 1 (1841) Luther v. Borden
* 48 U.S. 89 (1800) Charles Wilkes v. Samuel Dinsman
* 48 U.S. 132 (1819) Hugh Patton v. James Taylor
* 48 U.S. 160 Edward Fourniquet and Harriet Jane Fourniquet His Wife v. John Perkins
* 48 U.S. 172 James Erwin v. Alfred J Lowry Curator of Alexander McNeill Deceased
* 48 U.S. 185 The United Statess v. The City of Chicago
* 48 U.S. 198 Jennet Smith Calvin Powe and Thomas Powe v. Joseph Kernochen
* 48 U.S. 220 Bridget McLaughlin v. The Bank of Potomac
* 48 U.S. 234 (1805) Peter Wagner v. John Baird
* 48 U.S. 260 Maria Matheson John Darrington Robert James Billups Gayle John Gayle and Edward Ware v. The Branch of the Bank of the State of Alabama at Mobile
* 48 U.S. 262 Duncan McArthur's Heirss v. Walter Dun's Heirs
* 48 U.S. 272 Timothy Mace v. Jared Wells
* 48 U.S. 276 William Bodley and Thomas Robbins v. William M Goodrich
* 48 U.S. 279 William Crawford and David Files v. The Branch Bank of Alabama at Mobile
* 48 U.S. 283 (1809) George Smith v. William Turner Health-Commissioner of the Port of New York James Norris
* 48 U.S. 573 John Tyler
* 48 U.S. 586 (1796) Joshua Kennedy's Executors et al. v. Lessee of Jonathan Hunt John Hagan et al.
* 48 U.S. 595 Jacob Hugg and John Bandel v. The Augusta Insurance and Banking Company of the City of Augusta
* 48 U.S. 612 (1841) Philip Peck v. John S Jenness
* 48 U.S. 626 Abraham Colby v. James Ledden
* 48 U.S. 627 John Shawhan Daniel Shawhan George Perrin Benjamin Berry Catharine Snodgrass and Isaac Miller v. Perry Wherritt Assignee of the Estate of Benjamin Brandon
* 48 U.S. 646 William and Francis Sadlers v. Thomas B Hoover Sylvanus Chambers and Samuel H Dinkins Partners by the Style of Thomas B Hoover and Company
* 48 U.S. 650 Frederick and Samuel Barnard and Henry Hawley v. John Gibson
* 48 U.S. 658 (1844) The United States v. The Heirs of Louis Boisdor E
* 48 U.S. 660 (1820) The State of Missouri v. The State of Iowa
* 48 U.S. 681 (1836) Thomas Ap Catesby Jones v. The United States
* 48 U.S. 693 (1843) Benjamin Harris v. James D Wall
* 48 U.S. 706 Thomas Townsends v. Robert Jemison
* 48 U.S. 729 Pliny Cutler v. William a Rae
* 48 U.S. 738 Hezekiah Smith v. William Hunter Treasurer of Butler County James B Cameron Auditor of Butler County and the President and Trustees of the Miami University
* 48 U.S. 745 (1830) William McDonald Administrator of Duncan McArthur Deceased v. Matthew Hobson
* 48 U.S. 760 (1839) And Massingill v. A C Downs
* 48 U.S. 769 Grant Udell and Jacob Miller v. Alexander B Davidson
* 48 U.S. 772 Hall Neilson v. Wilson Lagow
* 48 U.S. 776 (1837) William Liews Who Sues for the Use of Nicholas Longworth v. Thomas Lewis Administrator De Bonis Non of Moses Broadwell Deceased
* 48 U.S. 784 Jeremiah Van Rensselaer v. John Watts's Executors
* 48 U.S. 785 (1842) Cornelius Lawrence v. Gilbert Allen and Samuel C Paxton
* 48 U.S. 798 (1831) Eleazer Backus v. William Gould
* 48 U.S. 812 Jonathan Nesmith v. Thomas C Sheldon
* 48 U.S. 819 George Stearns Administrator De Bonis Non of John Page v. Rufus R Page
* 48 U.S. 833 (1795) The United States v. Richard King and Daniel W Coxe
# United States Reports/Volume 487

* 487 U.S. 1 (1988) New York State Club Association, Inc. v. City of New York
* 487 U.S. 22 (1988) Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corporation
* 487 U.S. 42 (1988) West v. Atkins
* 487 U.S. 59 (1988) Supreme Court of Virginia v. Friedman
* 487 U.S. 72 (1988) United States Catholic Conference v. Abortion Rights Mobilization, Inc.
* 487 U.S. 81 (1988) Ross v. Oklahoma
* 487 U.S. 99 (1988) Braswell v. United States
* 487 U.S. 131 (1988) Felder v. Casey
* 487 U.S. 164 (1988) Franklin v. Lynaugh
* 487 U.S. 201 (1988) Doe v. United States
* 487 U.S. 223 (1988) Florida v. Long
* 487 U.S. 250 (1988) Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States
* 487 U.S. 266 (1988) Houston v. Lack
* 487 U.S. 285 (1988) Patterson v. Illinois
* 487 U.S. 312 (1988) Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Company
* 487 U.S. 326 (1988) United States v. Taylor
* 487 U.S. 354 (1988) Mississippi Power & Light Company v. Mississippi ex rel. Moore
* 487 U.S. 392 (1988) Sheridan v. United States
* 487 U.S. 412 (1988) Schweiker v. Chilicky
* 487 U.S. 450 (1988) Kadrmas v. Dickinson Public Schools
* 487 U.S. 474 (1988) Frisby v. Schultz
* 487 U.S. 500 (1988) Boyle v. United Technologies Corporation
* 487 U.S. 533 (1988) Murray v. United States (487 U.S. 533)
* 487 U.S. 552 (1988) Pierce v. Underwood
* 487 U.S. 589 (1988) Bowen v. Kendrick
* 487 U.S. 654 (1988) Morrison v. Olson
* 487 U.S. 735 (1988) Communications Workers of America v. Beck
* 487 U.S. 781 (1988) Riley v. National Federation of the Blind of North Carolina, Inc.
* 487 U.S. 815 (1988) Thompson v. Oklahoma
* 487 U.S. 879 (1988) Bowen v. Massachusetts Massachusetts
* 487 U.S. 931 (1988) United States v. Kozminski
* 487 U.S. 977 (1988) Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust
* 487 U.S. 1012 (1988) Coy v. Iowa
* 487 U.S. 1224 (1988) Spangler v. United States
* 487 U.S. 1225 (1988) Reed v. Collyer
* 487 U.S. 1241 (1988) Nicks v. Alabama
* 487 U.S. 1251 (1988) Spallone v. United States (487 U.S. 1251)
# United States Reports/Volume 488

* 488 U.S. 1 (1988) Rhodes v. Stewart
* 488 U.S. 9 (1988) Pennsylvania v. Bruder
* 488 U.S. 15 (1989) Town of Huntington v. Huntington Branch, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
* 488 U.S. 19 (1988) Shell Oil Company v. Iowa Department of Revenue
* 488 U.S. 33 (1988) Lockhart v. Nelson
* 488 U.S. 51 (1988) Arizona v. Youngblood
* 488 U.S. 75 (1988) Penson v. Ohio
* 488 U.S. 93 (1988) Carlucci v. Doe
* 488 U.S. 105 (1988) Pittston Coal Group v. Sebben
* 488 U.S. 152 (1988) McNamara v. County of San Diego Department of Social Services
* 488 U.S. 153 (1988) Beech Aircraft Corporation v. Rainey Beech Aerospace Services, Inc.
* 488 U.S. 179 (1988) National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Tarkanian
* 488 U.S. 204 (1988) Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital
* 488 U.S. 226 (1988) Harbison-Walker Refractories Division of Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Brieck
* 488 U.S. 227 (1988) Olden v. Kentucky
* 488 U.S. 235 (1989) Owens v. Okure
* 488 U.S. 252 (1989) Goldberg v. Sweet
* 488 U.S. 272 (1989) Perry v. Leeke
* 488 U.S. 299 (1989) Duquesne Light Company v. Barasch
* 488 U.S. 319 (1989) Reed v. United Transportation Union
* 488 U.S. 336 (1989) Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Company v. County Commission of Webster County, West Virginia
* 488 U.S. 347 (1989) Sheet Metal Workers' International Association v. Lynn
* 488 U.S. 361 (1989) Mistretta v. United States
* 488 U.S. 428 (1989) Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corporation
* 488 U.S. 445 (1989) Florida v. Riley
* 488 U.S. 469 (1989) City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Company
* 488 U.S. 563 (1989) United States v. Broce
* 488 U.S. 590 (1989) Oring v. State Bar of California
* 488 U.S. 873 (1988) Lipham v. Georgia
* 488 U.S. 876 (1988) Johnson v. Alabama
* 488 U.S. 877 (1988) Mann v. Oklahoma
* 488 U.S. 878 (1988) Hale v. Oklahoma
* 488 U.S. 902 (1988) Lego v. Illinois
* 488 U.S. 913 (1988) Metheny v. Hamby
* 488 U.S. 936 (1988) Daugherty v. Florida
* 488 U.S. 946 (1988) Dow Jones Company, Inc. v. Simon
* 488 U.S. 1020 (1989) Neelley v. Alabama
* 488 U.S. 1036 (1989) Bundy v. Dugger
* 488 U.S. 1047 (1989) Hamilton v. California (488 U.S. 1047)
* 488 U.S. 1301 (1988) Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. Bouknight (488 U.S. 1301)
* 488 U.S. 1306 (1989) John Doe v. John Doe (488 U.S. 1306)
* 488 U.S. 1311 (1989) California v. Freeman
# United States Reports/Volume 482

* 482 U.S. 1 (1987) Fort Halifax Packing Company, Inc. v. Coyne
* 482 U.S. 27 (1987) Fall River Dyeing Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
* 482 U.S. 64 (1987) United States v. Hohri
* 482 U.S. 78 (1987) Turner v. Safley
* 482 U.S. 117 (1987) Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Asphalt Products Company, Inc.
* 482 U.S. 124 (1987) Texas v. New Mexico (482 U.S. 124)
* 482 U.S. 137 (1987) Bowen v. Yuckert
* 482 U.S. 182 (1987) Rockford Life Insurance Company v. Illinois Department of Revenue
* 482 U.S. 193 (1987) Utah Division of State Lands v. United States
* 482 U.S. 220 (1987) Shearson/American Express, Inc. v. McMahon
* 482 U.S. 270 (1987) Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers
* 482 U.S. 304 (1987) First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles, California
* 482 U.S. 342 (1987) O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz
* 482 U.S. 369 (1987) Board of Pardons v. Allen
* 482 U.S. 386 (1987) Caterpillar, Inc. v. Williams
* 482 U.S. 400 (1987) California v. Superior Court of California, San Bernardino County
* 482 U.S. 423 (1987) Miller v. Florida
* 482 U.S. 437 (1987) Crawford Fitting Company v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.
* 482 U.S. 451 (1987) City of Houston v. Hill
* 482 U.S. 483 (1987) Perry v. Thomas
* 482 U.S. 496 (1987) Booth v. Maryland
* 482 U.S. 522 (1987) Societe Nationale Industrielle Aerospatiale v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
* 482 U.S. 569 (1987) Board of Airport Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc.
* 482 U.S. 578 (1987) Edwards v. Aguillard
* 482 U.S. 641 (1987) Frazier v. Heebe
* 482 U.S. 656 (1987) Goodman v. Lukens Steel Company
* 482 U.S. 691 (1987) New York v. Burger
* 482 U.S. 730 (1987) Kentucky v. Stincer
* 482 U.S. 755 (1987) Hewitt v. Helms
* 482 U.S. 919 (1987) Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Bell
# United States Reports/Volume 484

* 484 U.S. 1 (1987) Reagan v. Abourezk
* 484 U.S. 3 (1987) Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. McCoy
* 484 U.S. 9 (1987) Church of Scientology of California v. Internal Revenue Service
* 484 U.S. 19 (1987) Carpenter v. United States (484 U.S. 19)
* 484 U.S. 29 (1987) United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.
* 484 U.S. 49 (1987) Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.
* 484 U.S. 72 (1987) Karcher v. May
* 484 U.S. 86 (1987) Langley v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
* 484 U.S. 97 (1987) Omni Capital International v. Rudolf Wolff & Company, Ltd.
* 484 U.S. 112 (1987) National Labor Relations Board v. United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 23
* 484 U.S. 135 (1987) Mullins Coal Company, Inc. of Virginia v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
* 484 U.S. 171 (1988) Hartigan v. Zbaraz
* 484 U.S. 173 (1987) Vermont v. Cox
* 484 U.S. 174 (1988) Thompson v. Thompson (484 U.S. 174)
* 484 U.S. 193 (1988) Deakins v. Monaghan
* 484 U.S. 211 (1988) Yates v. Aiken
* 484 U.S. 219 (1988) Forrester v. White
* 484 U.S. 231 (1988) Lowenfield v. Phelps
* 484 U.S. 260 (1988) Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier
* 484 U.S. 292 (1988) Westfall v. Erwin
* 484 U.S. 301 (1988) Marino v. Ortiz
* 484 U.S. 305 (1988) Honig v. Doe
* 484 U.S. 343 (1988) Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill
* 484 U.S. 365 (1988) United Savings Association of Texas v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.
* 484 U.S. 383 (1988) Virginia v. American Booksellers Association, Inc.
* 484 U.S. 400 (1988) Taylor v. Illinois
* 484 U.S. 439 (1988) United States v. Fausto
* 484 U.S. 469 (1988) Phillips Petroleum Company v. Mississippi
* 484 U.S. 495 (1988) Etsi Pipeline Project v. Missouri
* 484 U.S. 518 (1988) Department of Navy v. Egan
* 484 U.S. 539 (1988) Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Company, Inc.
* 484 U.S. 554 (1988) United States v. Owens
* 484 U.S. 874 (1987) Brown v. Dodd
* 484 U.S. 878 (1987) Johnson v. Oklahoma
* 484 U.S. 882 (1987) Muehleman v. Florida
* 484 U.S. 887 (1987) Craig v. North Carolina
* 484 U.S. 904 (1987) Moore v. Georgia
* 484 U.S. 906 (1987) Morey v. Barrington Press, Inc.
* 484 U.S. 907 (1987) St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees
* 484 U.S. 934 (1987) Lindsey v. United States
* 484 U.S. 935 (1987) Williams v. Lynaugh
* 484 U.S. 980 (1988) McDowell v. United States (484 U.S. 980)
* 484 U.S. 990 (1987) Webb v. Maldonado
* 484 U.S. 992 (1988) Streetman v. Lynaugh
* 484 U.S. 1032 (1988) Kay v. David Douglas School District No. 40
* 484 U.S. 1034 (1988) Ford v. United States (484 U.S. 1034)
* 484 U.S. 1035 (1988) Hoo v. United States
* 484 U.S. 1079 (1988) Post v. Ohio