OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Sacred Books of the East/Volume 3/The Shih/Odes of the Temple and the Altar/The Sacrificial Odes of Kâu/Decade 2/Ode 10

Wǔ (武) is taken from the first line, being the posthumous name of King Wu of Zhou.
Ode 10. The Wû.
Sung in the ancestral temple to the music regulating the dance in honour of the achievements of king Wû.
This account of the piece, given in the Preface, is variously corroborated, and has not been called in question by any critic. Perhaps this brief ode was sung as a prelude to the dance, or it may be that the seven lines are only a fragment. This, indeed, is most likely, as we have several odes in the next decade, all said to have been used at the same occasion.
Oh! great wast thou, O king Wû, Displaying the utmost strength in thy work. Truly accomplished was king Wăn, Opening the path for his successors. Thou didst receive the inheritance from him. Thou didst vanquish Yin, and put a stop to its cruelties;— Effecting the firm establishment of thy merit.
# Sacred Books of the East/Volume 3/The Shih/Odes of the Temple and the Altar/The Sacrificial Odes of Kâu/Decade 2/Ode 5

Yǒu Gǔ (有瞽) doubled is the first line of the poem.
Ode 5. The Yû Kû.
The blind musicians of the court of Kâu; the instruments of music; and their harmony.
The critics agree in holding that this piece was made on occasion of the duke of Kâu's completing his instruments of music for the ancestral temple, and announcing the fact at a grand performance in the temple of king Wăn. It can hardly be regarded as a sacrificial ode.
There are the blind musicians; there are the blind musicians; In the court of (the temple of) Kâu.
​There are (the music-frames with their) face-boards and posts, The high toothed-edge (of the former), and the feathers stuck (in the latter); With the drums, large and small, suspended from them; And the hand-drums and sounding-stones, the instrument to give the signal for commencing, and the stopper. These being all complete, the music is struck up. The pan-pipe and the double flute begin at the same time.
Harmoniously blend their sounds; In solemn unison they give forth their notes. Our ancestors will give ear. Our visitors will be there;— Long to witness the complete performance.
* ↑ The blind musicians at the court of Kâu were numerous. The blindness of the eyes was supposed to make the ears more acute in hearing, and to be favourable to the powers of the voice. In the Official Book of Kâu, III, i, par. 22, the enumeration of these blind musicians gives 2 directors of the first rank, and 4 of the second; 40 performers of the first grade, 100 of the second, and 160 of the third; with 300 assistants who were possessed of vision. But it is difficult not to be somewhat incredulous as to this great collection of blind musicians about the court of Kâu.
* ↑ All the instruments here enumerated were performed on in the open court below the hall. Nothing is said of the stringed instruments which were used in the hall itself; nor is the enumeration of the instruments in the courtyard complete.
# Sacred Books of the East/Volume 3/The Shih/Odes of the Temple and the Altar/The Sacrificial Odes of Kâu/Decade 2/Ode 1

Chén Gōng (臣工) corresponds to "ministers and officers" on the first line.
The Second Decade, or that of Khăn Kung.
Ode 1. The Khăn Kung.
Instructions given to the officers of husbandry.
The place of this piece among the sacrificial odes makes us assign it to the conclusion of some sacrifice; but what the sacrifice was we cannot tell. The Preface says that it was addressed, at the conclusion of the spring sacrifice to ancestors, to the princes who had been present and taken part in the service. Kû Hsî says nothing but what I have stated in the above argument of the piece.
Ah! ah! ministers and officers, Reverently attend to your public duties. The king has given you perfect rules;— Consult about them, and consider them.
Ah! ah! ye assistants, It is now the end of ​spring; And what have ye to seek for? (Only) how to manage the new fields and those of the third year. How beautiful are the wheat and the barley! The bright and glorious God Will in them give us a good year. Order all our men To be provided with their spuds and hoes:— Anon we shall see the sickles at work.
# Sacred Books of the East/Volume 3/The Shih/Odes of the Temple and the Altar/The Sacrificial Odes of Kâu/Decade 2/Ode 2

Yī Xī (噫嘻) corresponds to "Oh! yes" on the first line.
Ode 2. The Î Hsî.
Further instructions to the officers of husbandry.
Again there is a difficulty in determining to what sacrifice this piece should be referred. The Preface says it was sung on the occasions of sacrifice by the king to God, in spring and summer, for a good year. But the note on the first two lines will show that this view cannot be accepted without modification.
Oh! yes, king Khăng Brightly brought himself near. Lead your husbandmen To sow their various kinds of grain, Going vigorously to work ​on your private fields, All over the thirty lî. Attend to your ploughing, With your ten thousand men all in pairs.
* ↑ These first two lines are all but unmanageable. The old critics held that there was no mention of king Khăng in them; but the text is definite on this point. We must suppose that a special service had been performed at his shrine, asking him to intimate the day when the sacrifice after which the instructions were given should be performed; and that a directing oracle had been received.
* ↑ The mention of 'the private fields' implies that there were also 'the public fields,' cultivated by the husbandmen in common, in behalf of the government. As the people are elsewhere introduced, wishing that the rain might first fall on 'the public fields,' to show their loyalty, so the king here mentions only 'the private fields,' to show his sympathy and consideration for the people.
* ↑ For the cultivation of the ground, the allotments of single families were separated by a small ditch; ten allotments, by a larger; a hundred, by what we may call a brook; a thousand, by a small stream; and ten thousand, by a river. The space occupied by 10,000 families formed a square of a little more than thirty-two lî. We may suppose that this space was intended by the round number of thirty lî in the text. So at least Kăng Khang-khăng explained it.
# Sage v. Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
96 U.S. 712
Sage v. Railroad Company
MOTION. 1. To dismiss the appeal. 2. To vacate the supersedeas.
Mr. H. B. Turner and Mr. J. C. Bullitt in support of the motions.
Mr. N. A. Cowdry and Mr. R. T. Merrick, contra.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sage v. Wyncoop

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
104 U.S. 319
Sage v. Wyncoop
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York.
This was a bill filed by Sage against Wyncoop, Cossitt, and Fowler, to compel the application of a fund in the custody of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York, to the payment of two judgments which he had recovered against Fowler in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, May 19 and June 2, 1875. It appears that executions, forthwith sued out upon the judgments, were by Cossitt, as sheriff, levied upon goods belonging to Fowler. On the 3d of June and after the levy, Fowler filed his petition in bankruptcy. On the 7th of that month he was adjudged a bankrupt, and on the 9th Cossitt was, by order of the District Court, restrained from proceeding to enforce by sale the collection of the judgments. Wyncoop was appointed in July, 1875, assignee in bankruptcy of Fowler. On the 17th of the following month the District Court made an order authorizing him to sell the goods and deposit the proceeds in court, and declaring that the lien of Sage and of the sheriff, by virtue of the executions and levies, if it was valid, be transferred to so much of such proceeds as would be sufficient to pay them. The sale was accordingly made and the money deposited. The bill prayed for the application of the fund above mentioned.
Wyncoop alone answered, admitting the material facts alleged in the petition, and setting up, among other things, that Fowler, being wholly insolvent, did, immediately before the filing of his petition in bankruptcy, procure or suffer his goods to be seized on the executions, and that the writs were sued out on judgments which he procured or suffered to be taken against him, with the fraudulent intent to thereby give Sage an unlawful preference, contrary to the provisions of the bankrupt law, Sage having reasonable cause to believe Fowler to be insolvent, and knowing that such seizure was made in fraud of his other creditors.
The court dismissed don final hearing the bill, and Sage appealed. The remaining facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
The case was argued by Mr. Aaron J. Vanderpoel for the appellant, and by Mr. George N. Kennedy for the appellee.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sage v. Memphis & Little Rock Railroad Co.

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Sage v. Memphis & Little Rock Railroad Co.."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Sage v. Memphis & Little Rock Railroad Co. (18 F. 571)
* Sage v. Memphis & Little Rock Railroad Co. (125 U.S. 361)
# Sage v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
250 U.S. 33
Sage v. United States
Argued: April 29, 1919. --- Decided: May 19, 1919
Mr. H. T. Newcomb, of New York City, for appellants.
Mr. Solicitor General Alex. C. King, of Atlanta, Ga., for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 33-36 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sampson v. Peaslee

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
61 U.S. 571
Sampson v. Peaslee
This case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Massachusetts.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
It was argued by Mr. Griswold and Mr. Reverdy Johnson for the plaintiffs in error, and by Mr. Black (Attorney General) for the defendant.
Mr. Justice WAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sampson v. Welsh

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
65 U.S. 207
Sampson v. Welsh
THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the eastern district of Pennsylvania, sitting in admiralty.
It was a case of libel under the circumstances which are stated in the opinion of the court, and was submitted on printed arguments by Mr. Wharton and Mr. Kane for the appellants, and Mr. Fallon and Mr. Serrill for the appellees.
The arguments of the counsel were directed to the merits of the case, which it is not necessary to state under the view taken of it by the court.
Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sampliner v. Motion Picture Patents Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
254 U.S. 233
Sampliner v. Motion Picture Patents Company
Argued: Nov. 12, 1920. --- Decided: Dec 6, 1920
Messrs. John G. White, of Cleveland, Ohio, Gustavue A. Rogers and Saul E. Rogers, both of New York City, E. C. Brandenburg, of Washington, D. C., and Austin V. Cannon, of Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Samuel Seabury, William M. Seabury, and Charles F. Kingsley, all of New York City, and Robert H. McCarter, of Newark, N. J., for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sampsell v. Imperial Paper & Color Corporation

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
313 U.S. 215
Sampsell v. Imperial Paper & Color Corporation
Argued: March 31, 1941. --- Decided: April 28, 1941
See 313 U.S. 600, 61 S.Ct. 1107, 85 L.Ed. --.
Mr. Thomas S. Tobin, of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.
Mr. iram E. Casey, of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Sampson v. Welsh/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
65 U.S. 207
Sampson v. Welsh
This case is brought up by an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the eastern district of Pennsylvania.
A libel was filed in the District Court for that district by S. & W. Welsh, the appellees, against the ship Sarah, (of which Sampson & Tappan, the appellants, are the owners,) to recover compensation for damages sustained by a cargo of coffee shipped on board the Sarah, at Rio, and consigned to the libellants; and also to recover compensation for sundry disbursements made by the libellants for the payment of wages and provisions for the ship.
The ship-owners appeared, and answered; but it is unnecessary to state more particularly the facts in controversy between the parties, because the final decree of the Circuit Court was for less than two thousand dollars, and consequently no appeal from its decree will lie to this court.
At the hearing in the District Court the libel was dismissed; but upon an appeal to the Circuit Court this decision was reversed, and a decree passed by the Circuit Court in favor of the libellants for the sum of $2,302.78, with leave to the respondents to set off the balance due them for freight, if they should elect to do so. Afterwards, the respondents appeared in court, and elected to set off this balance against the sum decreed against them, which reduced the amount to $1,071.27. But in making this election, the proctors for the respondents stated in writing, and filed in the court, that the election to set off was made without any waiver of their right to appeal from the decree. After this election was made, the court, on the 31st of August, 1858, passed its decree in favor of the libellants for the above-mentioned sum of $1,071.27, with interest from July 20, 1858. This was the final decree of the court, and the one from which the appeal is taken; and, as it is below $2,000, no appeal will lie under the act of Congress. And neither the reservation of the respondents in making their election, nor even the consent of both parties, if that had appeared, will give jurisdiction to this court where it is not given by law.
The appeal must therefore be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Samson

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Samson."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Blake, William (1868), "Samson" in Shepherd, Richard Herne (ed.), Poetical sketches by William Blake now first reprinted from the original edition of 1783.
* Claude McKay Samson (McKay)
* articles in the Dictionary of National Biography:
** "Samson (fl.550)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
** "Samson (d.1112)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
** "Samson (1135-1211)," in Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900, London: Smith, Elder, & Co. (1885–1900) in 63 vols.
* articles in the Catholic Encyclopedia (1913):
** "Samson (1)," in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
** "Samson (2)," in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
* "Samson," in The New Student's Reference Work, Chicago: F.E. Compton and Co. (1914)
* "Samson," in Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897)
# Richard Nixon Presidential Daily Diary/1969/April

* April 1, 1969
* April 2, 1969
* April 3, 1969
* April 4, 1969
* April 5, 1969
* April 6, 1969
* April 7, 1969
* April 8, 1969
* April 9, 1969
* April 10, 1969
* April 11, 1969
* April 12, 1969
* April 13, 1969
* April 14, 1969
* April 15, 1969
* April 16, 1969
* April 17, 1969
* April 18, 1969
* April 19, 1969
* April 20, 1969
* April 21, 1969
* April 22, 1969
* April 23, 1969
* April 24, 1969
* April 25, 1969
* April 26, 1969
* April 27, 1969
* April 28, 1969
* April 29, 1969
* April 30, 1969
# Richard Nixon Presidential Daily Diary/1969/December

* December 1, 1969
* December 2, 1969
* December 3, 1969
* December 4, 1969
* December 5, 1969
* December 6, 1969
* December 7, 1969
* December 8, 1969
* December 9, 1969
* December 10, 1969
* December 11, 1969
* December 12, 1969
* December 13, 1969
* December 14, 1969
* December 15, 1969
* December 16, 1969
* December 17, 1969
* December 18, 1969
* December 19, 1969
* December 20, 1969
* December 21, 1969
* December 22, 1969
* December 23, 1969
* December 24, 1969
* December 25, 1969
* December 26, 1969
* December 27, 1969
* December 28, 1969
* December 29, 1969
* December 30, 1969
* December 31, 1969
# Richard Nixon Presidential Daily Diary/1969/December/31

The White HousePresident Richard Nixon's Daily Diary (See Travel Record for Travel Activity) :
| Place Day Began | Place Day Began | Place Day Began | Place Day Began | Place Day Began | Date (Mo. Day. Yr.) DECEMBER 31, 1969 |
| SAN CLEMENTE - CALIFORNIA | SAN CLEMENTE - CALIFORNIA | SAN CLEMENTE - CALIFORNIA | SAN CLEMENTE - CALIFORNIA | SAN CLEMENTE - CALIFORNIA | TIMEDAY 9:55amWEDNESDAY |
| Time | Time | Phone P=Placed R=Received | Phone P=Placed R=Received | Activity | |
| In | Out | Lo | LD | Activity | |
| 9:55 | | | | The President went to his office. | The President went to his office. |
| | | | | The President met with: | The President met with: |
| 10:15 | 11:05 | | | H. R. Haldeman, Assistant | H. R. Haldeman, Assistant |
| 10:15 | 11:05 | | | John D. Ehrlichman, Assistant | John D. Ehrlichman, Assistant |
| 10:15 | 11:10 | | | Ronald L. Ziegler, Press Secretary | Ronald L. Ziegler, Press Secretary |
| 10:50 | 11:03 | | | Henry A. Kissinger, Assistant | Henry A. Kissinger, Assistant |
| 11:38 | 12:30 | | | The President met with his Assistant, Henry A. Kissinger. | The President met with his Assistant, Henry A. Kissinger. |
| 12:31 | 12:32 | P | | The President talked with C. G. Rebozo. | The President talked with C. G. Rebozo. |
| 1:35 | 2:01 | P | | The President talked with his Assistant, H. R. Haldeman. | The President talked with his Assistant, H. R. Haldeman. |
| 1:42 | | | | The President went to the Residence. | The President went to the Residence. |
| 2:37 | 2:46 | P | | The President talked with his brother, Donald Nixon. | The President talked with his brother, Donald Nixon. |
| 3:00 | | | | The President returned to his office accompanied by C. G. Rebozo. | The President returned to his office accompanied by C. G. Rebozo. |
| 3:25 | | | | The President went to the Residence. | The President went to the Residence. |
| 7:37 | 7:40 | P | | The President talked with his Assistant, H. R. Haldeman. | The President talked with his Assistant, H. R. Haldeman. |
| 9:15 | 9:16 | R | | The President talked with his Assistant, Henry A. Kissinger. | The President talked with his Assistant, Henry A. Kissinger. |
| 10:07 | 10:09 | | P | The President talked long distance with Guy Lombardo in New York City. | The President talked long distance with Guy Lombardo in New York City. |
| | | | | At sometime during the day the President saw the movie "Sweet Charity" accompanied by: The First Lady Patricia Nixon C. G. Rebozo | At sometime during the day the President saw the movie "Sweet Charity" accompanied by: The First Lady Patricia Nixon C. G. Rebozo |
# Richard Nixon Presidential Daily Diary/1969/February

* February 1, 1969
* February 2, 1969
* February 3, 1969
* February 4, 1969
* February 5, 1969
* February 6, 1969
* February 7, 1969
* February 8, 1969
* February 9, 1969
* February 10, 1969
* February 11, 1969
* February 12, 1969
* February 13, 1969
* February 14, 1969
* February 15, 1969
* February 16, 1969
* February 17, 1969
* February 18, 1969
* February 19, 1969
* February 20, 1969
* February 21, 1969
* February 22, 1969
* February 23, 1969
* February 24, 1969
* February 25, 1969
* February 26, 1969
* February 27, 1969
* February 28, 1969
# Richard Nixon Presidential Daily Diary/1969/February/1

The White HousePresident Richard Nixon's Daily Diary (See Travel Record for Travel Activity) :
| Place Day Began | Place Day Began | Place Day Began | Place Day Began | Place Day Began | Date (Mo. Day. Yr.) February 1, 1969 |
| WHITE HOUSE - WASHINGTON, D. C. | WHITE HOUSE - WASHINGTON, D. C. | WHITE HOUSE - WASHINGTON, D. C. | WHITE HOUSE - WASHINGTON, D. C. | WHITE HOUSE - WASHINGTON, D. C. | TIMEDAY 6:55 p.m. Saturday |
| Time | Time | Phone P=Placed R=Received | Phone P=Placed R=Received | Activity | |
| In | Out | Lo | LD | Activity | |
| 6:55 | | | | Thomas Shelton departed. | Thomas Shelton departed. |
| 7:00 | | P | | The President talked with Henry A. Kissinger. | The President talked with Henry A. Kissinger. |
| 7:19 | | P | | The President talked with Henry A. Kissinger. | The President talked with Henry A. Kissinger. |
| 8:35 | 10:55 | | | The President and the First Lady entertained dinner guests. Those present were: Robert Abplanalp James Crosby Robert A. Finch Hobart Lewis C. G . (Bebe) Rebozo H. R. Haldeman | The President and the First Lady entertained dinner guests. Those present were: Robert Abplanalp James Crosby Robert A. Finch Hobart Lewis C. G . (Bebe) Rebozo H. R. Haldeman |
| 10:20 | | | | The President telephoned long distance to Julie Eisenhower in Massachusetts. The call was not completed. | The President telephoned long distance to Julie Eisenhower in Massachusetts. The call was not completed. |
| 11:20 | | | | The President retired. | The President retired. |
# Richard Nixon Presidential Daily Diary/1969

* January
* February
* March
* April
* May
* June
* July
* August
* September
* October
* November
* December