# Historic Highways of America/Volume 1/Chapter 4

CHAPTER IV
HIGHLAND LOCATION OF ARCHÆOLOGICAL REMAINS
IN examining the standard work on the exploration of the American mounds, the Twelfth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology of the Smithsonian Institution, by Dr. Cyrus Thomas, it is plain that the mound-building Indians were well acquainted with the watersheds and high lands in the regions which they occupied. As a general rule it can be said that they cultivated the lowlands and built their forts and mounds upon the adjacent heights; but, so widespread are their works over the counties which they occupied, that it seems evident that they were at least well acquainted with all the surrounding territory. Whatever may have been the significance of their works, it is reasonable to believe that they were erected to be seen and visited; it is sane to believe that they ​were erected near the highways traveled, as has been the case with all other races of history. It is now in point to show that their mounds and effigies were not only on high ground, but often on the ranges of hills.
Examining Crawford county, Wisconsin, we find the mound-builders' works "on the main road from Prairie du Chien to Eastman," which "follows chiefly the old trail along the crest of the divide between the drainage of the Kickapoo and Mississippi rivers. . . The group is, in fact, a series or chain of low, small, circular tumuli extending in a nearly straight line northwest and southeast, connected together by embankments. . . They are on the top of the ridge."
"About 2 miles from Eastman, . . . just east of the Black River Road, . . . are three effigy mounds and one long mound. . . They are situated in a little strip of woods near the crest, but on the western slope of the watershed and near the head of a coulee or ravine."
​"In the same section . . . are the remains of two bird-shaped mounds, both on top of the watershed."
"The next group surveyed . . . are on the crest of the ridge heretofore mentioned and on both sides of the Black River Road."
"Mound No. 23 . . . is also in the form of a bird with outstretched wings. It lies . . . on top of the ridge, with the head lying crosswise of the highest point."
"Mound No. 24 is close to the right or east, on the high part of the ridge, extending in the same direction as 23."
"Northward of this group some 400 yards, there is a mound in the form of a quadruped, probably a fox, . . . partly in the woods and partly in the field on the west side of the road. It is built on the crest of the ridge with the head to the south."
​"About a mile southward of Hazen Corners . . . is a group. . . . They are all situated on the northern slope of the ridge not far from the top."
" . . . A small group . . . situated west of the Black River Road, . . . on the top of the ridge in the woods. The ridge slopes from them to the east and west."
“Some 10 or 12 miles southwest of the battle-field of Belmont [Missouri] is one of the peculiar sand ridges of this swampy region, called Pin Hook ridge. This extends 5 or 6 miles north and south, and is less than a mile in width. . . There is abundant evidence here that the entire ridge was long inhabited by a somewhat agricultural people, with stationary houses, who constructed numerous and high mounds, which are now the only place of refuge for the present inhabitants and their stock from the frequent overflows of the Mississippi."
​"These . . . are situated on the county road from Cairo, Illinois. . . . They are the highest ground in that immediate section" (Missouri).
Crowley's Ridge, running through Green, Craighead, Poinsett, and St. Francis counties (Arkansas) forms the divide between the waters of White and St. Francis rivers, and terminates in Phillips county just below the city of Helena. Most of the bottom lands are overflowed during high water. There are some evidences of archæological remains throughout the length of this ridge.
"The works . . . one mile northeast of Dublin [Franklin county, Ohio] . . . are on a nearly level area of the higher lands of the section."
"The group shown . . . is on a high hill near the Arnheim pike, Brown county [Ohio]."
"On nearly every prominent hill in the ​neighborhood of Ripley [Brown county, Ohio] are stone graves."
"Just east of Col. Metham's residence, on a high point overlooking the valley . . . was a mound."
" . . . A group . . . located 2 miles southwest of the village of Brownsville [Licking county, Ohio] and half a mile south of the National Road, on a high hill, from which the surrounding country is in view for several miles."
In the Catalogue of Prehistoric Works issued by the Bureau of Ethnology almost every page gives proof that the mound-builders were occupants of the highlands. Some quotations will be in place:
"Inclosures, hut-rings, and mounds on a sandy ridge between the Mississippi River and Old Town Lake at the point where they make their nearest approach to each other, and near the ancient outlet of Old Town Lake" (Phillips county, Arkansas).
​" . . . Remains of an Indian fort on the summit of a precipitous ridge near Lake Simcoe."
"Stone cairn . . . on ridge between Anawaka and Sweetwater creeks" (Douglass county, Georgia).
"Stone cairn on a ridge" (Habersham county, Georgia).
"Stone mound on a ridge" (Hancock county, Georgia).
"Deposit . . . on a ridge half a mile south of Clear Creek" (Cass county, Illinois).
"Mounds on the spur of a ridge, midway between the Welsh group [Brown county] and Chambersburg, in the extreme north-eastern part of the county" (Pike county, Illinois).
"Group of mounds on a ridge in Skillet Fork bottom" (Wayne county, Illinois).
​"Mounds on several high hills" (Franklin county, Indiana).
"Four mounds on top of a ridge near Sparksville" (Jackson county, Indiana).
"Stone enclosure known as Fort Ridge" (Caldwell county, Kentucky).
"Indian mounds . . . on 'Indian Hill'" (Hancock county, Kentucky).
"A group of circular mounds scattered along a ridge between Fox river and Sugar Creek" (Clark county, Missouri).
"Two parallel embankments stretching across a hog-back between two ravines" (Livingston county, New York).
"Embankments on Ridge road . . . along the edge of the bluff overlooking the Ridge road" (Niagara county, New York).
"Cairns on ridges" (Caldwell county, North Carolina).
​"Stone cairns . . . on trail crossing ridge between Tuckasegee river and Alarka Creek" (Swain county, North Carolina).
Flint Ridge in Coshocton and Licking counties, Ohio, contained stone and earth mounds and quarries; "Indian trail from Grave Creek mound, West Virginia, to the lakes, passing over Flint Ridge."
Early Highways on the Watersheds of Ohio
​Indians, among whom the building of mounds was a lost art, is exceedingly hard to draw.
These quotations give some evidence that the builders of our earliest archæological works were well acquainted with the high grounds. It is not apparent now that in any signal instance there exists evidence of a reliable character that any watershed was a highway; all we are seeking to show now is the very general fact that these people lived and moved and had their being often far inland on the heads of the little streams which never in historic times have served the purpose of navigation, and that here many of their works are found on the high grounds where it is sure all previous races have made their roads.
Now, it has been suggested already that lines of land travel have varied little since the time the buffalo and Indian marked out the best general courses across the continent. Mr. Benton said that the buffalo blazed the way for the railroad to the Pacific. In a general way this has been the rule throughout our history; the first routes chosen have often proved the best the tripod ​could find. Now it would be significant if it could be proved that there are numerous archæological remains along these strategic lines of travel. This, probably, cannot be shown. There is, however, strong evidence that is worthy of consideration. Many of the early routes of travel converged on certain well-worn, strategic gaps in our mountain ranges. It is interesting to notice how many archæological remains are found at these points. A few quotations from the Catalogue of Prehistoric Works will be in point:
"Stone cairns in Rabun Gap" (Rabun county, Georgia).
"Pictographs on large bowlders in Track Rock Gap" (Union county, Georgia).
"Ancient fire-bed and refuse heap at Buffalo Gap (bones and pottery found here)" (Union county, Illinois).
"Mound near Cumberland Gap" (Bell county, Kentucky).
​"Cairn at Indian Grave Gap on Green Mountain . . . in the trail" (Caldwell county, North Carolina).
"Mound . . . said to be . . . toward Grandmother Gap" (Caldwell county, North Carolina).
"Mound . . . one mile southwest of Paint Gap post-office. . . . Cairn at Indian Grave Gap, in Walnut Mountain . . . on south side of road from Marshall to Burnsville" (Madison county, North Carolina).
"Cairn at Boone's Gap on Boone's Fork of Warriors Creek" (Wilkes county, North Carolina).
"Cairns at Indian Grave Gap" (Blount county, Tennessee).
"Cairns in the gap on the state line at Slick Rock trail" (Monroe county, Tennessee).
"Mound 500 feet long, 250 feet wide, ​and 40 feet high . . . 2¼ miles west of Rockfish Gap Tunnel" (Augusta county, Virginia).
Some of these cairns do not, in all probability, date back to the mound-building era, but the mounds and other archæological works probably do, giving the best reasons for believing that the earliest of Americans found the strategic paths of least resistance across our great divides.
But not only in the mountain passes have our tripods placed their stern stamp of approval upon the ingenuity of the earliest pathfinders of America. In a host of instances our highways and railroads follow for many miles the general line of the routes of the buffalo and Indian on the high ground. This is particularly true of our roads of secondary importance, county roads, which in hundreds of instances follow the alignment of a pioneer road which was laid out on an Indian trail.
No one can examine the maps and diagrams of the archæological works of central North America with this truth in mind ​without noticing how largely these works are found near to some present-day thoroughfare. This is of significance. While it is true that works near such highways are perhaps more quickly discovered and easily approached, it is at the same time doubtful if any of importance have been ignored because they are at a distance from highways of approach. The relation of these works to neighboring roads has also been accidentally emphasized by the necessity of describing their position, which is often most easily done by a reference to adjacent roads. For all this due allowance must be made. At the same time this does not explain the fact that a significant fraction of these works lie along the general alignment of our present routes of travel and are in numerous instances touched by them. It need hardly be added that these roads were laid out with as much reference to the stars above them as to the ancient works near which they accidentally pass.
The following instances have a bearing on the question:
Two miles from Madison, Wisconsin, a line of mounds is found beside a highway ​to the city. The road passes through one of the group and the remainder follow the road on high ground almost parallel with it.
The road from Prairie du Chien (Wisconsin) to Eastman is paralleled by a long line of works. As previously noted (p. 69) this road follows the alignment of an old Indian trail.
There are mounds on both sides of the Black River road near Hazen Corners, Wisconsin.
In the archæological map of Hazen Corners, Wisconsin, the works bear a significant relation to the junction of the three roads which meet there. Supposing the roads to be the prehistoric route of travel, it is seen that all the mounds lie just beside them, many even touching them, but in only one instance does a mound cross any of the three present roads. True, the roads may have destroyed some of the works, but of the effigy mounds, at least, ​it is sure that the figures are complete, or nearly so.
It is to be noticed with reference to the effigy mounds that, to a person standing on the present highway the figures are "right side up." In the case of the animal figures, if the road runs to the left of a figure that figure is found to be lying on its right side; if the road runs on the right the figure is found to be lying on its left side; the feet are toward the road. In the case of birds, either the head or the tail is toward the present highway.
A line of mounds lies on high ground on the northeast bank of the Mississippi river, near Battle Island, Vernon county, Wisconsin. The road to De Soto is on the same bank and lies parallel with them throughout their length.
A remarkable line of mounds and effigies lies near Cassville, Grant county, Wisconsin. A road runs exactly parallel with them. The mounds lie on the west and the effigies ​on the east. The animals lie in a correct position to be viewed from the road.
Between the Round Pond mounds (Union county, Illinois), which are so near together that "one appears partially to overlap the other," runs a roadway.
A roadway cuts through the ancient works on the Boulware place, Clark county, Missouri; the alignment of the road and the series of works is nearly the same.
The Rich Woods works, Stoddard county, Missouri, lie on a long, sandy ridge; "the general course is almost directly north and south." The road to Dexter runs near them, touching one, in the same north and south direction the entire length.
The Knapp mounds, Pulaski county, Arkansas, "the most interesting group in the state," are surrounded by a wall of earth. A roadway passes through the entire semicircle formed by this surrounding wall, ​and passes between or at the base of the mounds contained within it.
A road runs through the entire length of the ancient stone work near Bourneville, Ross county, Ohio.
A state road (Lebanon to Chillicothe) crosses over Fort Ancient. At the spot where this road ascends to the fort, the embankments of the latter are found to be increased in height and solidity, showing that this point was most easy of ascent—probably the very spot where the ancient road was made.
A road passes through the entire length of the North Fork works (Ross county, Ohio).
A road passes through the entire length of ancient work, Ross county, Ohio.
Two roads cut ancient work in Fayette county, Kentucky.
​Ancient work is cut in two by road from Chillicothe to Richmondale, Liberty township, Ross county, Ohio.
The state road passes through the great Graded Way in Pike county, Ohio, one of the most famous works in the United States. It is surely significant that a modern road should pass so near the very track which evidently was a highway in prehistoric times.
Such are the conspicuous examples of ancient works that are now found to be on the alignment of modern routes of travel. In two singularly significant instances—in the Graded Way in Pike county, Ohio, and at Fort Ancient, Warren county, Ohio—there is no doubt that the modern road passes over the very track of the road used by the mound-builders. These two famous works, with the exception of the Serpent Mound probably the most famous in all the Central West, are near no stream of water which is not frozen in the winter and nearly dry in the summer. There can be ​no reasonable doubt that their builders used the routes on the watersheds.
As was said at the beginning, it does not seem wise to attempt to speculate on the probable routes by which these early tribes found their way to and fro between their works within the interior of the country. That they did so pass it seems difficult to doubt. That those early ways were along the watersheds, higher or lower, we may well believe, since for the races that have occupied the land since their time these watersheds have been the routes of travel—and will be until aërial navigation is assured.
That these earliest Americans had roads of one description or another, there is sufficient evidence. About their great works there were graded ways of ascent, up which the materials used in construction were hauled or borne. Now and then we find mention of some sort of roads which may seem to have been of a less local nature, but so far as highways of war and commerce are concerned there is no evidence which can be admitted into this treatise.
It will not be of disadvantage, however, ​to give a brief catalogue of such roads and ways as seem of most importance in the Catalogue of Prehistoric Works previously quoted:
Manitoba, Dominion of Canada: "Calf Mountain" (Tête de Bœuf), a mound 95 feet in diameter and 15 feet high, with a graded roadway 2 feet high, running southwest from it 154 feet; about 60 miles north of Pembina.
Jefferson County, Georgia: Remains of large cemeteries and a broad trail leading to Old Town, 8 miles from Louisville, on the eastern side of the Ogeechee.
Lowndes County, Georgia: Ruins of an "old town" within a few miles of Troupville, "with roads discernible, which are wide and straight."
Fayette County, Indiana: Camping grounds and traces of old trails in Secs. 34 and 36, T. 13 N., R. 13 E.
Franklin County, Indiana: Traces of camp sites and old trails are observable on ​Sec. 31, T. 10 N., R. 1 W.; Sec. 33, T. 10 N., R. 2 W.; Sec. 10, T. 12 N., R. 13 E.
Union County, Indiana: Traces of camp sites and old trails are observable on Secs. 8 and 11, T. 11 N., R. 2 W.; Secs. 34 and 36, T. 13 N., R. 13 E.; and Sec. 7, T. 14 N., R. 14 E.
Madison County, Louisiana: Group of earthworks, consisting of seven large and regular mounds and an elevated roadway, half a mile in length, on the right bank of Walnut Bayou, 7 miles from the Mississippi river.
Baltimore County, Massachusetts: Old Indian trail in same county, leading from the rocks of Deer Creek (Hartford county) to an ancient settlement near Sweet Air.
Licking County, Ohio: Work on Colton's place on Newark and Flint Ridge road—a conical hill which has had a roadway "cut entirely around it; the dirt is thrown up the hill, leaving a level track ​with a wall on the upper side." Two miles and a half northeast of Amsterdam.
West Virginia: Indian trail from Grave Creek mound to the lakes, passing over Flint Ridge.
Pike County, Ohio: Ancient works at Piketon, consisting of parallel walls, graded way and mounds.
It is not, however, on this slight evidence of local roadways that one would wish to base belief that the early Indians opened the first land highways in America. It is possible that they had great, graded roads near their towns and no roads elsewhere, but it is hardly conceivable.
We have seen that the mound-building Indians occupied, in many instances, the heads of the lesser streams, and the argument in favor of their having opened the ​first land highways has been based on this interior situation which, unless the lesson of history in this case tends to false reasoning, necessitated landward routes of travel.
There is, fortunately, one last piece of evidence which will more than make up for any lack of conclusiveness which may be laid to the charge of the preceding arguments.
* ↑ Twelfth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, p. 52.
* ↑ Id., pp. 54–55.
* ↑ Twelfth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, p. 54.
* ↑ Id., p. 56.
* ↑ Id., p. 58.
* ↑ Id., p. 58.
* ↑ Id., p. 59.
* ↑ Twelfth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, p. 60.
* ↑ Id., p. 62.
* ↑ Id., p. 184.
* ↑ Twelfth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, p. 192.
* ↑ Id., pp. 198–215.
* ↑ Id., p. 449.
* ↑ Id., p. 451.
* ↑ Twelfth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, p. 452.
* ↑ Id., p. 458.
* ↑ Id., p. 458.
* ↑ Catalogue of Prehistoric Works East of the Rocky Mountains, p. 22.
* ↑ Catalogue of Prehistoric Works East of the Rocky Mountains, p. 26.
* ↑ Id., p. 48.
* ↑ Id., p. 50.
* ↑ Id., p. 51.
* ↑ Id., p. 57.
* ↑ Id., p. 63.
* ↑ Id., p. 69.
* ↑ Catalogue of Prehistoric Works East of the Rocky Mountains, p. 74.
* ↑ Id., p. 75.
* ↑ Id., p. 91.
* ↑ Id., p. 94.
* ↑ Id., p. 128.
* ↑ Id., p. 144.
* ↑ Id., p. 146.
* ↑ Id., p. 152–153.
* ↑ Catalogue of Prehistoric Works East of the Rocky Mountains, p. 157.
* ↑ Id., pp. 169, 177.
* ↑ Catalogue of Prehistoric Works East of the Rocky Mountains, p. 52.
* ↑ Id., pp. 53, 54.
* ↑ Id., p. 68.
* ↑ Id., p. 90.
* ↑ Catalogue of Prehistoric Works East of the Rocky Mountains, p. 153.
* ↑ Id., p. 152.
* ↑ Id., p. 156.
* ↑ Id., p. 158.
* ↑ Id., p. 200.
* ↑ Id., p. 209.
* ↑ Catalogue of Prehistoric Works East of the Rocky Mountains, p. 218.
* ↑ Twelfth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, pp. 46, 47.
* ↑ Id., p. 52.
* ↑ Id., p. 56.
* ↑ Twelfth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, p. 55.
* ↑ Id., pp. 54, 55, 56, 59.
* ↑ Id., p. 78.
* ↑ Twelfth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, p. 85.
* ↑ Id., p. 160.
* ↑ Id., plate viii.
* ↑ Id., p. 175.
* ↑ Twelfth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, p. 243, plate opp. p. 244.
* ↑ Squier and Davis's Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley, plate iv.
* ↑ Id., plate vii.
* ↑ Id., plate x.
* ↑ Id., plate xii., No. 4.
* ↑ Id., plate xiv., No. 4.
* ↑ Squier and Davis's Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley, plate xx.
* ↑ Id., plate xxxi., No. 1.
* ↑ American Antiquarian, vol. viii., pp. 369, 370.
* ↑ Smithsonian Report, 1879, p. 443.
* ↑ White's Historical Collections of Georgia, p. 541.
* ↑ Smithsonian Report, 1882, pp. 737–749.
* ↑ Smithsonian Report, 1882, pp. 730–749.
* ↑ Id., pp. 728–749.
* ↑ Squier and Davis's Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley, pp. 115, 116, plate xxxix.
* ↑ Smithsonian Report, 1881, p. 682.
* ↑ Catalogue of Prehistoric Works East of the Rocky Mountains, p. 177.
* ↑ Atwater, Transactions of the American Antiquarian Society, vol. i. (1820), pp. 193, 194; Howe's Historical Collections of Ohio (1847), p. 413; Squier and Davis's Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley, pp. 88–90, fig. 20 and plate xxxi., No. 1, and p. 171, fig. 57, No. 3; MacLean's Mound Builders, pp. 37–38, fig. 4; Shepherd's Antiquities of the State of Ohio, p. 61.
Layout 2