OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Caulfeild, Algernon Thomas St. George

​CAULFEILD, Algernon Thomas St. George, J.P., Co. Galway, and D.L., J.P., Roscommon (High Sheriff, 1900); eldest son of late St. George Fras. Robt. Caulfeild and grandson of St. George Francis Caulfeild, J.P., of Donamon Castle, Co. Roscommon; b. 1869. Res.: Donamon Castle, Roscommon: Vicars Hill, Lymington, Hants. Carlton, Travellers', and Royal Yacht Squadron Clubs.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Castlestuart, Earl of

​CASTLESTUART, Earl of, 1800; Viscount Stuart, 1793; Baron Castlestuart, 1610 (Irld.); and a Bart. (Nova Scotia, 1637), Arthur Stuart, 7th Earl, M.C., late Major, Machine Gun Corps; third but eldest surviving son of Andrew John, 6th Earl, and Georgina, dau. of Gen. Arthur Stevens, 26th Madras N.I.; b. 6th Aug., 1889: s. his father, 7th Nov., 1921; m. 16th Dec, 1920, Eleanor May, eldest dau. of S. R. Juddenheim, of New York, and has issue a son. Res.: Stuart Hall, Stewardstown, Co. Tyrone, and Old Lodge, Belfield, Sussex.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Castletown of Upper Ossory, Baron

​CASTLETOWN OF UPPER OSSORY, Baron (Unit. Kgd., 1869, Bernard Edward Barnaby Fitzpatrick, 2nd Baron, B.A. (Oxon.); K.P. (1907), P.C. (1908), C.M.G. (1902); South African Campaign (Medal and four clasps); is a J.P., D.L. for Queen's Co.; served in 1st Life Guards, 1871-5, and again in Egyptian Campaign, 1882 (Medal and Clasp, "Telel-Kebir"); was M.P. for Portarlington, 1880-83; was Chancellor of the Royal University of Ireland 1906-09; only son of 1st Baron Castletown, and Augusta (d. 1899), dau. of the Rev. Archibald Douglas and Lady Susan Murray; b. 29th July, 1848: s. his father, 22nd Jan., 1883; m. 23rd April, 1874, Hon. Clara Ursula St. Leger, only surviving child of 4th Viscount Doneraile. Res.: Doneraile Court, Doneraile, Co. Cork; Granston Manor, Abbeyleix, Queen's Co. Clubs: Brooks's, Travellers', London; Kildare Street, Dublin.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Chadwick, Rt. Rev. George Alexander

​CHADWICK, Rt. Rev. George Alexander, D.D. Educ.: Trinity College, Dublin. Ordained, 1863: Rector of Armagh, 1872-96; Dean of Armagh, 1886-96; Bishop of Derry and Raphoe, 1896-1915. Pubns.: Christ bearing Witness to Himself (Donnellan Lectures), 1879; As He that Serveth. 1880; My Devotional Life, 1882; Exodus and St. Mark in the Expositor's Bible; Pilate's Gift and other Sermons, 1899; Poems, chiefly Sacred, 1900; The Intellect and the Heart and other Sermons, 1905: b. 10th Oct., 1840; m. 1st, 1864, Emma, dau. of J. F. Browning, Ealing: 2nd. 1911, Helen, sister of Rev. Canon E. T. Crozier. Res.: 37 St, Mary's Road, Dublin.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Cavan, Earl of

​CAVAN, Earl of, Viscount Kilcoursie and Lord Lambart, 1647; Baron Cavan, 1618 (Irld.), Frederick Rudolph Lambart, 10th Earl, K.P. (1916). G.C.M.G. (1919), K C.B. (1918), C.B. Mil. (1915), M.V.O., 4th Class (1910); Hon. LL.D. (Cantab.); elected a Representative Peer for Ireland, 1915; A.D.C. to Gov.-Gen. of Canada, 1891-3; served in S. Africa (mentioned in despatches); Brig.-Gen. Commanding 4th Guards' Brig., 1914; Guards' Division, 1915; XIV. Corps, 1916-17; Commander-in-Chief, British Forces in Italy, 1918; Lieutenant-General, 1917: Lieutenant of the Tower of London, 1920; G.O.C.-in-Chief, Aldershot Command, 1920: eldest son of Frederick Edward, 9th Earl of Cavan, and Mary (d. 1905), dau. of the late Rev. John Olive, M.A.: b. 16th Oct., 1865; s. his father, 14th July, 1900; m. 1893, Caroline Inez (d. 1920), dau. of late George Baden Crawley. Res.: Wheathampstead, Herts. Clubs: Guards' and Turf.
# Thom's Irish Who's Who/Chambers, Sir Newman Pitt

​CHAMBERS, Sir Newman Pitt, Knt. (1897), knighted in recognition of his long and valuable services in Londonderry during his official career; J.P., D.L., Co. Donegal; High Sheriff of Co. Donegal and Grand Juror of Cos. Tyrone and Donegal; second son of late Thomas Chambers, of Aberfoyle, and his wife, Mary Anna, dau. of Capt. Newman, 56th ​Regt.; m. April 6th, 1880, Inez (d. 1914), youngest dau. of late Alexander Young, of Coolkeragh House, Co. Londonderry, and has issue a son, Brooke (m. 1917, Marie, dau. of Newman Pitt-Chambers), and a dau., Muriel (m. 1904, C. A. Munro, son of Col. Munro, of Hill Crest, Devon). Res.: Carrig Cape, Co. Donegal. Clubs: Constitutional, W.C.; Northern Counties, Londonderry.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/16th Congress/1st Session/Resolution 2

II. Resolution for the further distribution of the journal of the convention which formed the Constitution of the United States.
The Secretary of State to furnish each member of Congress, not entitled by resolution of 27th March, 1818, the President, Vice President, &c. with copies of the journal, &c. of the Federal convention.Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of State be instructed to furnish to each member of the present Congress and the delegates from territories, (who may not be entitled to the same, under the resolution of Congress of the twenty-seventh of March, one thousand eight hundred and eighteen,) the President and Vice President of the United States, the executive of each state and territory, the attorney general and judges of the courts of the United States, and the colleges and universities in the United States, each one copy; for the use of each of the departments, viz: State, Treasury, War, and Navy, two copies each; for the use of the Senate, five copies; and for the use of the House of Representatives, ten copies of the volumes containing the journal, acts and proceedings of the convention which formed the present Constitution of the United States; and that the residue of the copies of said journal be deposited in the library of Congress, for the use of the members.
Approved, January 19, 1820.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/16th Congress/1st Session/Resolution 4

IV. Resolution for the distribution of certain copies of the journal of the convention which formed the Constitution.
The Secretary of State to transmit a copy of the Journal to each of the surviving members of the Convention.Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of State be, and he is hereby, directed to transmit one copy of the journal of the Federal convention at Philadelphia, in one thousand seven hundred and eighty-seven, which formed the Constitution of the United States, to each of the members, now alive, of the said convention.
Approved, May 8, 1820.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/16th Congress/1st Session/Resolution 5

V. Resolution giving the consent of Congress to a compact concluded between the states of Kentucky and Tennessee, for the settlement of their boundary line.
The consent of Congress given to the compact between Kentucky and Tennessee.Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the consent of Congress be, and the same is hereby, given to a compact or agreement, made and concluded, by and between the states of Kentucky and Tennessee, at Frankfort, in Kentucky, on the second day of February, one thousand eight hundred and twenty, to adjust and establish the boundary line between them, and for other purposes.
Approved, May 12, 1820.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/16th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 1

Chapter I.—An Act to alter the terms of the district court in Alabama.
First session to be holden at Mobile, 3d Monday of Feb. 1821. Stated sessions at Mobile and Cahawba.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the first session of the district court for the district of Alabama, shall be holden at Mobile, on the third Monday of February, eighteen hundred and twenty-one; and thereafter, the stated sessions of said court, instead of the times heretofore appointed, shall be holden, annually, as follows: At Mobile, on the first Mondays of January and June; and at Cahawba, on the first Mondays of April and November; any law to the contrary notwithstanding.
Process returnable accordingly.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That all process which may have issued, or may hereafter issue, returnable to the next succeeding terms, as heretofore established, shall be held returnable, and be returned, to those terms to which they are severally changed by this act.
But one clerk and one act of records.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That there shall be but one clerk for the district, who shall keep only one set of records, any law to the contrary notwithstanding.
Approved, November 27, 1820.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/16th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 15

Chap. XV.—An Act extending the time for issuing and locating military land warrants to officers and soldiers of the revolutionary army.
Act of March 3, 1823, ch. 36. Act of May 26, 1824, ch. 177. Act of May 20, 1826, ch. 138. Act of March 2, 1827, ch. 35. Act of Feb. 24, 1819, ch. 41.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the time limited, by the second section of the act approved on the twenty-fourth day of February, one thousand eight hundred and nineteen, for issuing military land warrants to the officers and soldiers of the revolutionary army, shall be extended to the fourth day of March, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-three; and the time for locating the unlocated warrants shall be extended to the first day of October thereafter.
Approved, March 2, 1821.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/16th Congress/1st Session/Resolution 3

III. Resolution to authorize the publication of part of the secret journal of Congress, under the articles of confederation.
The secret journal, papers, &c. of the old Congress, heretofore considered confidential, from the year 1783 to the year 1789, to be published, under the direction of the President, and 1000 copies printed, &c.Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the secret journal, together with all the papers and documents connected with that journal, and all other papers and documents heretofore considered confidential, of the old Congress, from the date of the ratification of the definitive treaty of peace between the United States and Great Britain, in the year one thousand seven hundred and eighty-three, to the formation of the present government, not remaining in the office of the Secretary of State, be published under the direction of the President of the United States, and that a thousand copies thereof be printed and deposited in the library, subject to the disposition of Congress.
Approved, April 21, 1820.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 3/16th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 11

Chap. XI.—An Act to extend the time for locating Virginia military land warrants, and returning surveys thereon to the general land office.
Time allowed until 4th Jan., 1823, to obtain warrants and complete locations; and until 4th Jan., 1826, to reutrn surveys and warrants to procure patents.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the officers and soldiers of the Virginia line on continental establishment, their heirs or assigns, entitled to bounty lands within the tract of country reserved by the State of Virginia, between the little Miami and Sciota rivers, shall be allowed a further time of two years, from the fourth day of January, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-one, to obtain warrants and complete their locations, and the further time of four years, from the fourth day of January, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-two, to return their surveys and warrants, or certified copies of warrants, to the general land office, to obtain patents.
Act of March 3, 1807, ch. 31. The provisions of the act of 3d March, 1807, revived, with limitation, as to time, as in the preceding section, &c. Proviso; no location on tracts previously patented or surveyed.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the provisions of the act, entitled “An act authorizing patents to issue for lands located and surveyed by virtue of certain Virginia resolution warrants,” passed the third day of March, one thousand eight hundred and seven, shall be revived and in force, with all its restrictions, except that the respective times allowed for making locations, and returning surveys thereon, shall be limited to the terms prescribed by the first section of this act, for the location and return of surveys on other warrants, and that the surveys shall be returned to the general land office: Provided, That no locations as aforesaid, in virtue of this or the preceding section of this act, shall be made on tracts of land for which patents had previously been issued, or which had been previously surveyed; and any patent which may, nevertheless, be obtained for land located contrary to the provisions of this act, shall be considered null and void.
Approved, February 9, 1821.
# Tom Swift and His Airship

* related portals: Children's literature.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article.
Third book in the Tom Swift series.
TOM SWIFT AND
HIS AIRSHIP
BY
VICTOR APPLETON
AUTHOR OF "TOM SWIFT AND HIS MOTOR-CYCLE," "TOM SWIFT AND HIS MOTOR BOAT," "TOM SWIFT AND HIS SUBMARINE BOAT," ETC.
ILLUSTRATED
NEW YORK
GROSSET & DUNLAP
PUBLISHERS
Made in the United States of America
STRAIGHT AT THE TOWER RUSHED THE RED CLOUD, AND HIT IT A GLANCING BLOW.
Tom Swift and His AirshipPage 53.
CONTENTS
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Grant/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
110 U.S. 225
United States v. Grant
Grant & Co. sued the United States in the court of claims on the second of December, 1868, and on the sixth of December, 1869, recovered a judgment for $34,225.14. On the fifth of January, 1883, the following act was passed by congress:
'Be it enacted * * * that the court of claims be and it is hereby directed to reopen and readjudicate the case of Albert Grant and Darius Jackson * * * upon the evidence heretofore submitted to the said court in said cause, * * * and if said court, in such readjudication, shall find from such evidence that the court gave judgment for a different sum than the evidence sustains, or the court intended, it shall correct such error, and adjudge to the said Albert Grant such additional sum, in said cause, as the evidence shall justify, not to exceed fourteen thousand and sixteen dollars and twenty-nine cents; and the amount by readjudication in favor of the said Albert Grant shall be a part of the original judgment in the cause recorded in the fifth court of claims report, page eighty.'
Under this act Grant, on the thirteenth of January, 1883, applied to the court to re-examine the case and to render a judgment nunc pro tunc for the additional sum of $14,016.29. Upon this application the court, on due consideration, found that the original judgment was given for a different sum than was intended, and that, 'in order to correct such error and adjudge to said Albert Grant such additional sum in this cause as the evidence justifies, he should receive a further sum of $14,016.29;' and on the eleventh of June, 1883, a judgment for that amount was rendered. From this judgment the United States took an appeal, which Grant now moves to dismiss on the ground that no appeal lies from an order or judgment entertained in such a proceeding. In our opinion this motion should be granted. The act of congress, in its legal effect, is nothing more than a direction to the court of claims to entertain an application to correct an error in the entry of one of its former judgments. The readjudication ordered is to be upon the old evidence, and, if an error is found, the correction is to be made, not by rendering a new judgment, but by amending the old one. The language is, 'and the amount by readjudication in favor of the said Albert Grant shall be a part of the original judgment.' As, when the act was passed, an appeal from the original judgment was barred by lapse of time, we are satisfied it was the intention of congress to make the action of the court of claims upon this readjudication final. Certainly, the old judgment is not opened to an appeal by the readjudication, and there is nothing to indicate that the new part of the judgment can be separated from the old for the purposes of review here. By the correction the new judgment was merged in the old.
The motion to dismiss is granted.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Great Northern Railway Company (287 U.S. 144)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
287 U.S. 144
United States v. Great Northern Railway Company
Argued: Oct. 11, 1932. --- Decided: Nov 7, 1932
The Attorney General and Mr. Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for the United States.
Messrs. F. G. Dorety and R. J. Hagman, both of St. Paul, Minn., and W. W. Millan, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from page 145 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice CARDOZO delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Grant

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
110 U.S. 225
United States v. Grant
Sol. Gen. Phillips and Thomas Simons, for appellant.
P. Phillips, W. Hallen Phillips, and R. P. Lowe, for appellees.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Great Northern Railway Company

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "United States v. Great Northern Railway Company."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* United States v. Great Northern Railway Company (287 U.S. 144)
* United States v. Great Northern Railway Company (343 U.S. 562)
See also Great Northern Railway Company v. United States.
# United States White v. Knox

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
111 U.S. 784
United States White v. Knox
S. V. White, for plaintiff in error.
Nath. Wilson for defendant in error.
WAITE, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Wilhelm v. Chain

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
300 U.S. 31
United States Wilhelm v. Chain
Argued: and Submitted Jan. 8, 1937. --- Decided: Feb 1, 1937
Mr. F. E. Parrack, of Kingwood, W. Va., for petitioners.
Messrs. P. J. Crogan, of Kingwood, W. Va., and Frank Cox, of Morgantown, W. Va., for respondent.
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Willoughby v. Howard

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 445
United States Willoughby v. Howard
Argued: Nov. 10, 1937. --- Decided: Jan 3, 1938
Mr. Walter E. Beebe, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioners.
Messrs. Lloyd Heth and Julius Moses, both of Chicago, Ill., for respondents.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Volpe v. Smith

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
289 U.S. 422
United States Volpe v. Smith
Argued: May 10, 1933. --- Decided: May 22, 1933
Messrs. John E. Byrne and Frank R. Reid, both of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.
The Attorney General and Mr. Whitney North Seymour, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Vajtauer v. Commissioner of Immigration at Port of New York

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
273 U.S. 103
United States Vajtauer v. Commissioner of Immigration at Port of New York
Argued: Nov. 24-29, 1926. --- Decided: Jan 3, 1927
Messrs. Walter H. Pollak and Isaac Shorr and Mrs. Carol Weiss King, all of New York City. for appellant.
The Attorney General and Mr. W. D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Unto my Books—so good to turn—

* "Unto my books so good to turn" in Poems: Second Series (1891)
* "Unto my books so good to turn" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# Unto a broken heart

Unto a broken heart No other one may go Without the high prerogative Itself hath suffered too.
# Unto the Third and Fourth Generation

First published as a serial in Munsey's Magazine in June, July and August 1895 and then in The Windsor Magazine in December 1901 and January 1902. It was renamed Drink: A Love Story on a Great Question when published in book form in 1906 by Newnes.
Layout 2
Unto the Third and Fourth Generation.
By Hall Caine,
Author of "The Manxman," "The Deemster," "The Scapegoat," etc.
* Chapter I
* Chapter II
* Chapter III
* Chapter IV
* Chapter V
* Chapter VI
* Chapter VII
* Chapter VIII
* Chapter IX
* Chapter X
* Chapter XI
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1931, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 92 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Unto This Last

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Unto This Last."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Unto This Last - M. K. Gandhi
* Unto This Last (Ruskin)
# Transactions of the Geological Society
## First series (1811–1821)

* Volume 1 (1811)
* Volume 2 (1814)
* Volume 3 (1816)
* Volume 4 (1817)
* Volume 5 (1821)

## Second series (1822–1824)

* Volume 1 Part 1 (1822)
* Volume 1 Part 2 (1823)
* Volume 1 Part 3 (1824)
Continued under the title Transactions of the Geological Society of London