OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Unlawful Marriage

* related portals: Marriage.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
UNLAWFUL MARRIAGE:
AN ANSWER
TO
"THE PURITAN" AND "OMICRON,"
WHO HALE ADVOCATED, IN A PAMPHLET,
THE LAWFULNESS OF THE MARRIAGE OF A MAN WITH HIS DECEASED WIFE'S SISTER.
BY J. J. JANEWAY, D. D.
NEW-YORK: ROBERT CARTER, 58 CANAL ST. 1844.
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1844, By ROBERT CARTER, in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the Southern District of New-York.
NEW-YORK: JOHN F. TROW & CO., PRINTERS, No. 33 Ann-street.
ADVERTISEMENT.
In writing this reply the author has sincerely sought the truth. He wishes the truth to be established, whatever may be the result of his labor.
That the reader may test his fairness, he has carefully noted the pages where may be found the passages on which he animadverts, and generally the paragraphs too. This will greatly facilitate the trouble of finding the passages.
With the same view, he has endeavored to mark accurately the book and chapter, and sometimes the page of the authorities to which he refers, or from which he quotes.
The author has no fondness for controversy; but ​having, for his own satisfaction, examined the question, he felt it to be his duty to do what might be in his power to defend the truth, and set forth the claims of what he believes to be a command of God.
    New Brunswick, Nov. 29, 1843.
ERRATA.
Page  64, line  6, read no law, for the law. Page„  78, line„  6, read„ no law,nieces, for„ wives. Page„ 114, line„ 17, read„ no law,seu for„ sue. Page„ 117, line„  2, read„ no law,110 for„ 118.
CONTENTS.
CHAPTER I.
CHAPTER II.
CHAPTER III.
CHAPTER IV.
CHAPTER V.
CHAPTER VI.
CHAPTER VII.
CHAPTER VIII.
CHAPTER IX.
CHAPTER X.
CHAPTER XI.
CHAPTER XII.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Unknown Female Head

* Unknown Female Head, a poem from the series Medallion Wafers in the Literary Gazette, 8th February 1823.
* Unknown Female Head, the poem republished in The Vow of the Peacock, and Other Poems, 1835.
# Unknown to Harry Hopkins (October 11, 1941)

* related portals: World War II.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Office of Foreign Agricultural Relations
Washington, D.C.
Oct. 11, 1941.
Mr. Hopkins:
Attached is a suggested reply to the cablegram received through Ambassador Winant. This reply has been prepared after consulting with Paul Appleby, who recently discussed the wheat agreement with British officials in London, and with Harry Hawkins of the State Department.
LAWheeler
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walden v. Knevals

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
114 U.S. 373
Walden v. Knevals
D. A. Walden, for himself.
J. M. Woolworth, for appellee.
FIELD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walden Denn v. Craig/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
1. Ought the Circuit Court to have granted leave to the plaintiff to extend the term laid in his declaration?
2. Does a writ of error lie to the refusal to grant this amendment?
It has been truly said in argument, by the counsel for the plaintiff in error, that the power of amendment is extended at least as far in the 32d section of the judiciary act, as in any of the British statutes; and that there is no species of action to which the discretion of the Court in this respect ought to be more liberally applied than to the action of ejectment. The proceedings are all fictitious, fabricated for the mere purposes of justice, and there is every reason for allowing amendments in matters of mere form. There is peculiar reason in this case, where the cause has been protracted, and the plaintiff kept out of possession beyond the term laid in the declaration, by the excessive delays practised by the opposite party. The cases cited by the plaintiff's counsel in argument are, we think, full authority for the amendment which was asked in the Circuit Court, and we think the motion ought to have prevailed. But the course of this Court has not been in favour of the idea that a writ of error will lie to the opinion of a Circuit Court, granting or refusing a motion like this. No judgment in the cause is brought up by the writ, but merely a decision on a collateral motion, which may be renewed. For this reason, the writ of error must be dismissed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walden v. Bodley's

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
50 U.S. 34
Walden v. Bodley's
THESE two cases were brought up by appeal, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kentucky.
The caues were exceedingly complicated, and cannot be understood without a reference to the following plat.
The history and facts of the case are given so much in detail in the opinion of the court, that it is unnecessary to do more than refer the reader to that opinion, as delivered by Mr. Justice Catron.
It was argued by Mr. Underwood for the appellants, and Mr. C. S. Morehead for the appellees. The only question was, whether or not the Circuit Court had properly executed the mandate of this court, and the arguments of the counsel are noticed with sufficient clearness in the opinion of the court, as well as the facts in the case.
Mr. Justice CATRON delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walden v. Skinner

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
101 U.S. 577
Walden v. Skinner
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia.
The facts are stated in th opinion of the court.
Mr. Benjamin H. Hill for the appellant.
Mr. A. R. Lawton, contra.
MR. JUSTICE CLIFFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walden v. Bodley

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
39 U.S. 156
Walden v. Bodley
ON appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kentucky.
This case was submitted to the Court by Mr. Underwood, for the appellants; and by Mr. Crittenden, for the appellees, on the argument in the preceding case of Walden vs. Craig's heirs et al.
Mr. Justice M'LEAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Walden v. The Heirs of Gratz

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
14 U.S. 292
Walden v. The Heirs of Gratz

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# William Cramp Sons Ship Engine Bldg Company v. International Curtis Marine Turbine Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
246 U.S. 28
William Cramp Sons Ship Engine Bldg Company v. International Curtis Marine Turbine Company
Argued: January 29 & 30, 1918. --- Decided: March 4, 1918
[Syllabus from pages 28-29 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Clifton V. Edwards, of New York City, and Abraham M. Beitler, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.
[Argument of Council on pages 29-33 intentionally omitted.]
Messrs. Frederick P. Fish, Charles Neave, and William G. McKnight, all of New York City, for respondents.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 33-34 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# William Danzer Company v. Gulf & S I Railroad Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
268 U.S. 633
William Danzer Company v. Gulf & S I Railroad Company
Argued: April 28, 1925. --- Decided: June 8, 1925
Mr. Brenton K. Fisk, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error.
Mr. B. E. Eaton, of Gulfport, Miss., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# William Cramp Sons Ship Engine Building Company v. International Curtis Marine Turbine Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
228 U.S. 645
William Cramp Sons Ship Engine Building Company v. International Curtis Marine Turbine Company
Argued: April 14, 1913. --- Decided: May 26, 1913
Messrs. James R. Sheffield, Clifton V. Edwards, and Samuel Dickson for petitioner.
Messrs. Frederick P. Fish and Richard N. Dyer for respondents.
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Van Der Weyde v. Ocean Transport Company the Taigen Maru

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
297 U.S. 114
Van Der Weyde v. Ocean Transport Company the Taigen Maru
Argued: Jan. 15, 1936. --- Decided: Feb 3, 1936
Messrs. John P. Hannon and William P. Lord, both of Portland Or., and Andrew G. Haley, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Messrs. Lane Summers, F. T. Merritt, and W. H. Hayden, all of Seattle, Wash., for respondents.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Van Buren v. Digges

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
52 U.S. 461
Van Buren v. Digges

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Weeds v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
255 U.S. 109
Weeds v. United States
Argued: Oct. 18, 19, and 20, 1920. --- Decided: Feb 28, 1921
Mr. Charles E. Hughes, of New Work City, for plaintiffs in erro.
Mr. Chief Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Weekly Cincinnati Law Bulletin

The Weekly Cincinnati Law Bulletin is a periodical, published in 66 volumes from 1876 to 1921, when it merged with the Ohio Law Reporter. From 1883 it is called the 'Weekly Law Bulletin'. From 1885 to 1901 it is called the 'Weekly Law Bulletin and Ohio Law Journal'. From 1902 onwards it is called the 'Ohio Law Bulletin'. In 1885 it merged with the Ohio Law Journal and in 1902 it merged with the Ohio Legal News.
For further commentary on this periodical, see (1951) 24(1) Ohio Bar 503.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Weekly Dispatch
## Issues

* 9 March 1856
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Victory Carriers, Inc. v. Law

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
404 U.S. 202
Victory Carriers, Inc., et al. v. Law
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
No. 70-54 Argued: October 18-19, 1971. --- Decided: December 13, 1971
State law and not federal maritime law held to govern suit by respondent longshoreman who was injured by alleged defect in his stevedore employer's pier-based forklift truck which respondent was operating on the dock to transfer cargo to a point alongside a vessel where it was to be hoisted aboard by the ship's own gear. Seas Shipping Co. v. Sieracki, 328 U.S. 85, and Gutierrez v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 373 U.S. 206, distinguished. Pp. 204-216.
432 F. 2d 376, reversed.
WHITE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and STEWART, MARSHALL, and BLACKMUN, JJ., joined. DOUGLAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which BRENNAN, J., joined, post, p. 216.
W. Boyd Reeves argued the case for petitioners. With him on the briefs were George F. Wood and T.K. Jackson, Jr.
Ross Diamond, Jr., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was J. Cecil Gardner.
E.D. Vickery, Dennis Lindsay, Francis A. Scanlan, and J. Stewart Harrison filed a brief for the National Maritime Compensation Committee as amicus curiae urging reversal.
David B. Kaplan filed a brief for the American Trial Lawyers Association as amicus curiae urging affirmance.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Victory comes late—

* "Victory comes late" in Poems: Second Series (1891)
* "Victory comes late" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# Vida's Art of Poetry/end matter

Layout 2
BOOKS Printed for A. Bettesworth, at the Red Lion in Pater-noster-row.
The Art of Poetry, in 4 Canto's. Price 1s.
The Lutrin: An Heroic-Comical Poem, in 6 Canto's. To which is prefix'd, some Account of the Author's Writings, and this Translation. By N. Rowe, Esq; 3d Edition. Pr. 1s. 6d. Both by Mons. Boileau.
Esther, Queen of Persia: An Historical Poem in four Books; by John Henley, B.A. of St. John's College, Cambridge. Pr. 1s. 6d.
A Poem on the Last Day; by Edward Young, L.L.D. Fellow of All-Souls-College, Oxon. 3d Edit. corrected. With Cuts. Pr. 1s.
The Force of Religion; or, Vanquish'd Love: A Poem, in two Books; by the same Author. Pr. 1s.
Poetical Miscellanies, on several Occasions; by Sam. Jones, Gent. Pr. 1s.
Ovid's Metamorphoses, in 15 Books; made English by several Hands; adorn'd with Cuts. 2d Edition, with great Improvements. 2 Vols. By Dr. Sewell. Pr. 6s.
Nuptial Dialogues and Debates; or, An useful Prospećt of the Felicities and Discomforts of a Marry'd Life, incident to all Degrees from the Throne to the Cottage; digested into serious, merry, and satyrical Poems, wherein Both Sexes, in all Stations, are reminded of their Duty, and taught how to be happy in a Matrimonial State; in two neat Pocket-Volumes; by the Author of the London Spy. Pr. 6s. Adorn'd with Cuts.
New Miscellaneous Poems, with five Love Letters from a Nun to a Cavalier; with the Cavalier's Answers. Pr. 1s. 6d.
# Vittoria Colonna

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Vittoria Colonna."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Vittoria Colonna, a poem by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow published in Birds of Passage.
* Vittoria Colonna, a play by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow published in Michael Angelo.
* Vittoria Colonna, a novel by Eyre Evans Crowe

## Encyclopaedic

* "Vittoria Colonna," in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
* "Colonna, Vittoria," in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
# Vivekachudamani (Swami Madhavananda)

1921. Index
Vivekachudamani of Sri Sankaracharya
Text with English Translation, Notes and an Index.
By Swami Madhavananda.
The Advaita Ashrama, Mayavati, Dt. Almora, Himalayas
1921
Published by Swaml Madhavananda, President, Advaita Ashrama, Mayavati.
Printed by Mohan Lal Sah Chowdhary
at the Prabuddha Bharata Press, Mayavati,
Dt. Almora.

## Index

* Part 1: Sloka 1 to 10

## prev

   सर्ववेदान्तसिद्धान्तगोचरं तमगोचरम् | गोविन्दं परमानन्दं सद्गुरुं प्रणतोऽस्म्यहम् || १ ||
1. I bow to Govinda, whose nature is Bliss Supreme, who is the Sadguru,$^1$ who can be known only from the import of all Vedānta, and who is beyond the reach of speech and mind.
[‘Viveka’ means discrimination, ‘cūḍā’ is crest, and ‘maṇi’, jewel. Hence the title means 'Crest-jewel of discrimination'. Just as the jewel on the crest of a diadem is the most conspicuous ornament on a person's body, so the present treatise is a masterpiece among works treating of discrimination between the Real and the unreal.
In this opening stanza salutation made to God (Govinda), or to the Guru, in his absolute aspect. It may be interesting to note that the name of Śaṅkara's Guru was Govindapāda, and the śloka is ingeniously composed so as to admit of both interpretations.
$^1$Sadguru—lit. the highly qualified preceptor, and may refer either to Śaṅkara's own Guru or to God Himself, who is the Guru of Gurus.]
   जन्तूनां नरजन्म दुर्लभमतः पुंस्त्वं ततो विप्रता तस्माद्वैदिकधर्ममार्गपरता विद्वत्त्वमस्मात्परम् | आत्मानात्मविवेचनं स्वनुभवो ब्रह्मात्मना संस्थितिः मुक्तिर्नो शतजन्मकोटिसुकृतैः पुण्यैर्विना लभ्यते || २ ||
2. For all beings a human birth is difficult to obtain, more so is a male body; rarer than that is Brāhmanahood; rarer still is the attachment to the path of Vedic religion; higher than this is erudition in the scriptures; discrimination between the Self and not-Self, Realization, and continuing in a state of identity with Brahman--these come next in order. (This kind of) mukti (liberation) is not to be attained except through the well-earned merits of hundred crore of births.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Vivekachudamani (Swami Madhavananda)/2
## Sloka #11
#### Translation

Work is for the purification of the mind, not for the perception of the reality. The realisation of Truth is brought about by discrimination and not in the least by ten millions of acts.

## Sloka #12
#### Translation

12. By adequate reasoning the conviction of the reality about the rope is gained, which puts an end to the great fear and misery caused by the snake worked up in the deluded mind.
[ Reality of the rope — realisation that it is a rope and not a snake, for which it was mistaken. ]

## Sloka #13
#### Translation

13. The conviction of the Truth is seen to proceed from reasoning upon the salutary counsel of the wise, and not by bathing in the sacred waters, nor by Daan, nor by hundreds of Pranayamas,

#### Glossary

* The wise — men of realisation
* Daan — Gift, Donation
* Pranayam — Breathing exercises

## Sloka #14
#### Translation

Success depends essentially on a qualified aspirant, and time, place and such other means are but auxiliaries in this regard.
[The qualifications will be enumerated in stanzas 1 6 and 17.]

## Sloka #12
#### Translation

Hence the seeker after the Reality of the Atman should take to reasoning, after duly approaching the Guru — who should be the best of the knowers of Brahman, aod an ocean of mercy„
16. The intelligent and learned man skilled in arguing in favour of the Scriptures and refuting counter-arguments against them, — one who has got the above characteristics is the fit recipient of the knowledge of the Atman.
17. The man of discrimination between the Real and the unreal, whose mind is turned away from the unreal, who possesses calmness and the allied virtues, and Is longing for Liberation, is alone considered qualified to inquire after Brahman.
18. Regarding this, sages have spoken of four means of attainment, which alone being present, the devotion to Brahman succeeds, and in the absence of which, it fails.
# Viva! Viva! Gesu

   The author of this Italian hymn is unknown. In the Index to the People's Hyl. 1867, it is attributed to "S. Alfonso" (Liguori), but we know of no authority for the ascription. The hymn is found in the Raccolta di Orazioni e Pie Opere colle Indulgenze, and is one of the "Aspirazioni Divote" therein. It is usually regarded as being of the 18th cent., but we have failed to trace it beyond this work.
   —"Viva! viva! Gesu, Che per mio bene," in A Dictionary of Hymnology, (ed.) by John Julian (1892)
English-language translations of Viva! Viva! Gesù! include:
* Hail, Jesus, Hail by Frederick W. Faber, 1849.
* Glory be to Jesus by Edward Caswall, 1857.

## See also

* "Viva! viva! Gesu, Che per mio bene," in A Dictionary of Hymnology, (ed.) by John Julian (1892)
# Vive La Martiniere

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Vive La Martiniere is the school song for the three schools founded by Major General Claude Martin in Calcutta and Lucknow in India and in Lyon, France. The song was written in the late 1860s by Frederick James Rowe while he was an English teacher at La Martiniere Boys' College in Calcutta, India. The song is now an inseparable part of the ceremonies at all seven schools, and is sung in honour of the school's founder Claude Martin. Two recordings of the song are available online. The first version is complete with words, while the second version is a recording of the music only.
Hail! Hail! the name we own Frederick James Rowe
    Hail! Hail! the name we own;
    Hail! to the giver;
    Blessing and bright renown;
    Be his forever!
Verse 1:
    All his martial deeds may die,
    Lasting still his charity;
    This his laurel blooms for aye,
    Dead he lives in us today.
    This then our song shall be,
    As we chant his eulogy -
    "May our Founder's name endure;
    Ever spotless, ever pure."
Chorus
Verse 2:
    Faithful may we ever be
    Followers of his constancy;
    Firm of hand against the foe
    Soft of heart to succour woe.
    This then our song shall be,
    As we chant his eulogy -
    "May our Founder's name endure
    Ever spotless ever pure!"
Chorus
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse