OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Gwinn v. Buchanan/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
45 U.S. 1
Gwinn v. Buchanan
As a general principle, it is undoubtedly true, that the marshal is responsible for the acts of his deputy in the execution of process; and if the deputy had taken the funds mentioned in the testimony without any orders from the plaintiffs, or their attorney, and returned the execution satisfied, the plaintiffs would not have been bound to accept these funds in discharge of their judgment, and might have insisted on the full amount from the marshal in gold and silver.
But it is clear, that the plaintiffs had a right to accept in payment of their execution whatever they thought proper. The deputy-marshal was bound to obey their directions upon that subject; and neither the deputy nor the marshal can be held responsible to the plaintiffs for any loss they may sustain by reason of an act done in pursuance of their own instructions.
But the plaintiffs seem to suppose that the authority given to the deputy was not pursued, and that the payment of the money to them without delay was a condition annexed to the authority, which had been disregarded by the deputy. But however this may be, as between him and the plaintiffs, the act or omission of the deputy in that respect cannot make the marshal himself liable. Gwinn knew nothing of the directions given by the plaintiffs' attorney. So far as Ferguson was acting as deputy-marshal, he had no right to receive, in payment of the debt, any thing but gold and silver. He had no authority from the marshal to take any thing else. But when the plaintiffs interfered, and directed him to receive the funds above mentioned, he was, in receiving such funds, not acting under the authority of the marshal as his deputy, but as agent of the plaintiffs. And if, in executing the power they gave him, he disobeyed their instructions, they must look to him, and not to the marshal, who knew nothing of these instructions, had no concern with them, and who cannot, therefore, upon principles of law or equity, be held responsible for the manner in which they were executed.
The judgment of the Circuit Court must, therefore, be reversed, with costs.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# History of New South Wales from the records

* Volume 1 (1889, by George Burnett Barton) (page scan index)
* Volume 2 (1894, by Alexander Britton) (page scan index)
# History of Norfolk

Written c. 1736; published 1805-10.

## Instructions for use

Each volume (with the exception of volumes 3 and 4) contains details about three or four hundreds, which each contain information on ~ a dozen villages in that hundred. If you don't know which hundred you want, the volume pages list the villages contained in each.

## Contents

* Introduction.
* Volume 1: Diss. Giltcross. Shropham.
* Volume 2: Thetford. Grimeshou. Wayland. Forehoe.
* Volume 3: The History of the City and County of Norwich, part I.
* Volume 4: The History of the City and County of Norwich, part II.
* Volume 5: Humble-yard. Depewade. Earsham. Henstede.
* Volume 6: South Greenhow. South Erpingham.
* Volume 7: Gallow and Brothercross. Blofield. Clackclose.
* Volume 8: Clavering. North Erpingham. Eynford. Freebridge.
* Volume 9: Freebridge (concluded). North Greenhow. Happing. Holt. Launditch.
* Volume 10: Launditch (concluded). Loddon. Mitford. Smethdon. Taverham.
* Volume 11: Tunstede. Walsham. West and East Flegg. Great Yarmouth. Indexes.
# History of Norfolk/Volume 1

British History online's transcription of the volume. Footnotes removed. Formating automatic, there may be some errors.
Including the hundreds (administrative areas) of:
* Diss, including the villages and towns of:
** Diss
** Roydon
** Brisingham (now Bressingham)
** Fersfield
** Shelfhanger (now Shelfanger)
** Burston
** Osmundeston, or Scole (now Scole)
** Thorp-parva, or Little Thorp (now merged into Thorpe Abbotts)
** Frense (now Frenze)
** Thelton (now Thelveton)
** Shimpling
** Gissing
** Winfarthing
** Dickleburgh
** Titshall (now Tivetshall)
* Giltcross, including the villages and towns of:
** Giltcross
** Lopham
** Norton
** Gatesthorp (now Gasthorpe)
** Garboldesham
** Ridlesworth (now Riddlesworth)
** Rushworth (now Rushford)
** Snarehill-House (now Snarehill)
** West-Herling (now West Harling)
** Little-Herling, now called Middle-Herling (now Harling)
** Market-Herling, or East-Herling (now East Harling)
** Quidenham
** Banham
* Shropham, including the villages and towns of:
** Old-Bukenham (now Old Buckenham)
** New-Bukenham (now New Buckenham)
** Eccles
** Harpham (now Hargham)
** Snetterton
** Lerling (now Larling)
** Rowdham (now Roudham)
** Bridgham
** Bretenham (now Brettenham)
** Illington
** Shropham
** Hocham (now largely Great Hockham)
** Little Hocham (now Little Hockham)
** East, or Great Wrotham (now merged into Wretham)
** West, or North Wrotham (now merged into Wretham)
** Wrotham-Thorp, or Little Wrotham, now Thorp-House (now merged into Wretham)
** Rockland-Toft (now Rocklands / Rockland All Saints; Rockland St Peter is covered in Volume 2)
** Great Elingham (now Great Ellingham)
** Besthorp (now Besthorpe)
** Atleburgh (now Attleborough)
** Kilverstone
All other place names ostensibly remained unchanged from 1736 to the present day (2009).
# EXERCISE 20

O söl pelestimöl ! Elilädöl vobuki ola nitedik, e no kanöl kapälön dilis anik, penob ole penedi at al säkön va vilol seplanön obe setis suköl.
Honored Sir : Having received your letter and not having and time to write to you this week, I hope that you will excuse the unavoidable (not-to-be-avoided) delay.
# EXERCISE 22

Älöfoböv mani at, if äbinom-la gudikum. If ägolobs-la vädelo al spatön, äbinosöv saunlik. If ägolols-la adelo al spatön, blinolsos buki nulik, keli äbonedob, de bukatedam. Binosöv gälod gletik obe, getön penedi lonedik de ol. If no äbinos-la so vamik, älöfoböv visitön flenis obsik in zif.
If I should see the teacher to-day I would give him the book which he wishes to see. This book would be useful to you if you should wish to study the French language. If you had seen this man in the garden he would have spoken to you. If you should travel in Europe you would hear many languages.
# EXERCISE 17

Put the following words into all the tenses, giving the meaning or each :
Kömob. Golol. Getom. Nägof. Lömibos. Sagon. Labobs. Binols. Sumoms.
O flen divikün ! egetob penedi ola blefik e pidob das ebinol malädik. Spelob das uvedol suno saunikum e das ovisitol obis omulo.
Dear friend : the long letter, which you wrote to me, has pleased me (kimefal) very much. I hope that I shall soon have got better, and that I shall see you again next year.
# EXERCISE 19

Löfob fidön fluki. No vilob liladön bukis mödik, sod gudikis. Eseilön binos ofen gudikum ka epükön. Men nonik kanom nolön valikosi. Kim okanom numön stelis sila u tofis mela ? Binob in jul al studön, no al pledön. Olemob bukis al lenadön volapüki. Sötol studön volapüki al kanön pükön ko nets valik.
I like to read good books. I wish to see the stars. To read is better than to play. We ought to buy a house if we can buy it cheap. This man can read six languages and speak three; he likes to study and he has time to study. It is better to have loved and lost than not to have loved.
# EXERCISE 14

Hereafter, many of the words used in the exercises will have to be looked for in the vocabulary at the end of the book.
Si, yes. No, no or not; when it means not, it is placed next before the verb which is denied.
Lesi, yes indeed. Leno, not at all, by no means.
God no löfom menis badik. Mens badik no löfoms Godi.---Subsats in volapük no binoms neudik; laboms genis te tel, no kil. Dins nelifik binoms gena manik. ---Tedels, kels sevoms volapüki spodoms ko vol lölik. Kims sevoms volapüki ? Valiks mens estudik in vol lölik.
I do not see my three books. Which book [book which] is good ? This book is not bad. I have not many good books. How many genders are there in Volapük ? ["Genders how many are in Volapük ?" Omit "there" in "there is," "there are."] There are two genders [two genders are] in Volapük and in French ; there are three genders in English and in German. One (not bal, 1) studies Volapük in all countries of the whole world.
# EXERCISE 15

Fidobs kilna in del, telsebalna in vig. Buk at tidom volapüki obe balidna. Man et, kel binom deutel, pükom nelijapüki badiko, ab sevom volapüki gudiko. Dels goloms vifix, e no labobs timi mödik.
The dog eats fast. You write well [goodly]. We speak Volapük badly. I write three letters twice in a week. We buy books cheaply ["cheaply" after "buy"]. we buy cheap boks. The merchant buys cheap and sells dear.
# EXERCISE 16

Ka, than. äs, as. Suno, soon.
Binob bäledikum ka om. Buk at binom gudikum ka et. Dom obsik no binom so gletik äs olsik : binom smalikum. Penol gudikumo ka ob. Binob flen ola divodikün. Spelob das binol in saun gudik, o flen divikük ! Volapük binom pük nefikulikün in vol lölik.
I am more healthy than you. I have larger hands than you. The dog has larget than the cat. What book is the best in the whole world ? I have not so many books as you, but I read more [books]. What is the easiest languain the whole world ? I do not know a language which is easier than Volapük.
# EXERCISE 2
#### DECLINING

To decline a noun is to give all its cases in regular order. Thus fat is declined :
| fat | fata | fate | fati |
| fats | fatas | fates | fatis |
Decline all the nouns in the vocabulary of Exercise 1. (Remember to accent the last syllable.) Express the following in Volapük : Of the fathers, to the boys, of a man, to the dog, the geese.

#### VOCABULARY

| Givom, gives. | Logom, sees. |
| Blinom, brings. | Labom, has. |
{[font-old|size="-1"|(Why these words end in om will be understood hereafter)}}
| Nam, hand. | Fut, foot. | Fat, father. |
| Düp, hour. | Mon, money. | Log, eye. |
Read in Volapük and translate into English :
Man labom dogi. Man labom dogis tel. Pul labom dogis tel e jipi bal. Dog logom gani. Pul logom dogi. Man givom dogi pule. Pul givom gani mane. Man givom doabis kil pule. Dog labom futis fol. Gan labom futis tel. Man labom futis tel e namis tel. Dog mana labom futis fol. Fat mana givom doabis kil pule. O fat ! man givom doab bal pule. Kim blinom dogis mane ? Pul blinom dogis mane. Kim labom moni ? Fat labom moni.
Answer in Volapük the following questions :
Kim labom dogi ? Kim logom gani ? Kim givom dogi pule ? Kimi man givom pule ? Kime man givom dogi ?
The last three questions may be answered by the same words differently emphasized.
Caution.--In translating into Volapük do not overlook the distinction between the subject and the object of the sentence. Put the subject in the kimal and the object in the kimifal. In the above exercises there is one error in this respect, purposely left uncorrected. Did you notice it ?
Express the following sentences in Volapük. In each sentence there is at least one word which ought to be put in the kimifal.
Who has the dog ? The boy has two dogs [dogs 2]. The man has three dogs. The dog has four feet. The boy has two feet. Who has two hands ? The man gives money. The man gives money to the boy (or, the man gives the boy some money; some would not be translated). The boy's father [father of boy] gives a dollar to the man. The year has twelve months. The month has thirty days. The week has seven days. The day has 24 hours. Who brings the goose ? Who sees the dog ? Who sees the two sheep ? To whom does the man give money ? (Literally, to whom man gives money ? "Does" is untranslatable.) To whom does the boy bring money ? The boy brings five dollars to the father.
# EXERCISE 18
#### Fa, by.

'Nelijapük papükom in Nelij, Pebaltats, Kanadän, Talop e läns votik. Volapük potidom in juls valik. Volapük pädatuvom fa söl Schleyer. Fluks poseloms delido ayelo; päseloms nedelido äyelo. Dom gletik pabumom in süt telsekilid.
Many children are educated in the schools or America; many have been educated and many will be educated. Books are sold by the merchant, whose store is in 42nd street. These books are not mine; they are sold. [Is this patüp ?] What language is spoken in America ?
# EXERCISE 21

Give four dollars to this poor boy. Please excuse the liberty which I take. Please visit us in our new house. Please answer this letter soon. Kill that snake! Remain in the house. Please mail me three copies of your new book. Accept my cordial salutations. Let each boy take his book and read.
Givolöd bodi mane pöfik. Kömolsös al visitön obis in dom obas nulik. Sekusadolös obe no egepükön penede olik sunumo. Gololöz se dom! Potolös obe samadis fol vödasbuka nelijik. Pul alik sumomöd peni okik e penomöd. Blibolös in gad.
# Housing and Community Development Act of 1992/Title X/Subtitle E

SEC. 1061. REPORTS OF THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT.
(a) Annual Report. The Secretary shall transmit to the Congress an annual report that --
made in implementing the various programs authorized by this title;
studies on childhood lead poisoning, including studies that analyze the relationship between interim control and abatement activities and the incidence of lead poisoning in resident children;
that may improve the performance by the Department of Housing and Urban Development in combating lead hazards through the expansion of lead hazard evaluation and reduction activities;
accordance with subtitle D; and
expended on lead hazard evaluation and reduction activities.
(b) Biennial Report. --
this Act, and at the end of every 24-month period thereafter, the Secretary shall report to the Congress on the progress of the Department of Housing and Urban Development in implementing expanded lead-based paint hazard evaluation and reduction activities.
the public aware of lead-based paint hazards;
hazard evaluation and reduction activities are being conducted in the various categories of housing;
paint hazard evaluation and reduction for programs within the jurisdiction of the Department of Housing and Urban Development;
lead-based paint hazards in all housing as expeditiously as possible, including cost-effective technology, standards and regulations, trained and certified contractors, certified laboratories, liability insurance, private financing techniques, and appropriate Government subsidies;
described in subparagraph (D) exists, make recommendations to correct shortcomings, and provide estimates of the costs of measures needed to build an adequate infrastructure; and
Secretary deems appropriate.
# Housing and Community Development Act of 1992/Title XI
## TITLE XI — NEW TOWNS DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF OF LOS ANGELES
### Sec. 1108. Reports.

===Sec. 1109. Definitions.===
# Housing and Community Development Act of 1992/Title XIII/Subtitle A
## SUBTITLE A—SUPERVISION AND REGULATION OF ENTERPRISES

    PART 1—FINANCIAL SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS REGULATOR
       Sec. 1311. Establishment of Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight.
       Sec. 1312. Director.
       Sec. 1313. Duty and Authority of Director.
       Sec. 1314. Authority to Require Reports by Enterprises.
       Sec. 1315. Personnel.
       Sec. 1316. Funding.
       Sec. 1317. Examinations.
       Sec. 1318. Prohibition of Excessive Compensation.
       Sec. 1319. Authority to Provide for Review of Enterprises by Rating Organization.
       Sec. 1319A. Equal Opportunity in Solicitation of Contracts.
       Sec. 1319B. Annual Reports by Director.
       Sec. 1319C. Public Disclosure of Final Orders and Agreements.
       Sec. 1319D. Limitation on Subsequent Employment.
       Sec. 1319E. Audits by GAO.
       Sec. 1319F. Information, Records, and Meetings.
       Sec. 1319G. Regulations and Orders.
    PART 2—AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY
       SUBPART A—GENERAL AUTHORITY
       SUBPART B—HOUSING GOALS
       SUBPART C—ENFORCEMENT OF HOUSING GOALS
    PART 3—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
       Sec. 1351. Amendments to Title 5, United States Code.
       Sec. 1352. Prohibition of Merger of Office.
       Sec. 1353. Protection of Confidential Information.
       Sec. 1354. Review of Underwriting Guidelines.
       Sec. 1355. Studies of Effects of Privatization of FNMA and FHLMC.
       Sec. 1356. Transition.
# Housing and Community Development Act of 1992/Title XIII/Subtitle A/Part 2
## PART 2—AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY

    SUBPART A—GENERAL AUTHORITY
       Sec. 1321. Regulatory Authority.
       Sec. 1322. Prior Approval Authority for New Programs.
       Sec. 1323. Public Access to Mortgage Information.
       Sec. 1324. Annual Housing Report.
       Sec. 1325. Fair Housing.
       Sec. 1326. Prohibition of Public Disclosure of Proprietary Information.
       Sec. 1327. Authority to Require Reports by Enterprises.
       Sec. 1328. Reports by Secretary.
    SUBPART B—HOUSING GOALS
       Sec. 1331. Establishment.
       Sec. 1332. Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Goal.
       Sec. 1333. Special Affordable Housing Goal.
       Sec. 1334. Central Cities, Rural Areas, and Other Underserved Areas Housing Goal.
       Sec. 1335. Other Requirements.
       Sec. 1336. Monitoring and Enforcing Compliance with Housing Goals.
       Sec. 1337. Reports During Transition.
       Sec. 1338. Effective Date of Transition Goals.
    SUBPART C—ENFORCEMENT OF HOUSING GOALS
       Sec. 1341. Cease-and-Desist Proceedings.
       Sec. 1342. Hearings.
       Sec. 1343. Judicial Review.
       Sec. 1344. Enforcement and Jurisdiction.
       Sec. 1345. Civil Money Penalties.
       Sec. 1346. Public Disclosure of Final Orders and Agreements.
       Sec. 1347. Notice of Service.
       Sec. 1348. Subpoena Authority.
       Sec. 1349. Regulations.
# Hoeper v. Tax Commission of Wisconsin

United States Supreme Court
284 U.S. 206
Hoeper v. Tax Commission of Wisconsin
Argued: Oct. 15, 1931. --- Decided: Nov 30, 1931
Mr. Claire B. Bird, of Wausau, Wis., for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from page 207 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. John W. Reynolds, Atty. Gen., and Harold M. Wilkie, of Madison, Wis., for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 208-211 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hoff v. County of Jasper State

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
110 U.S. 53
Hoff v. County of Jasper State

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# History of Norfolk/Volume 3/Chapter 33
## CHAPTER XXXIII

Of The City In The Time Of Queen Of Mary The Second And King William The Third.
William and Mary, King and Queen of England, began their reign Feb. 13, 1688, and were solemnly crowned April 11, 1689, by the Archbishop of York.
In 1691, four boys of the name of Crowe were bound apprentices, by the gift of Mr. Roger Crowe, and another boy
In 1692; in which year a soldier was shot to death for desertion, in Chapel Field.
Mr. John Larwood, an independent, was nominated sheriff, by the court, but would neither fine nor serve; upon which he appeared at the board of privy council, and declared that he had never received the sacrament according to the church of England, and would not, and therefore insisted that he was not qualified by law, so that they were ordered to sue out a mandamus to choose another sheriff, and Gamaliel Sugden was chosen thereupon.
Sept. 8, at two in the afternoon, an earthquake was sensibly felt all over London and many miles round, it was perceived at Norwich and in that neighbourhood, but not much.
In 1693, coals were sold in Norwich at 3l. a chaldron.
The court chose Mr. Wasey, and the commons Mr. Pinder, (both dissenters,) for sheriffs, who refused to serve as Mr. Larwood did, so that there were no sheriffs till Nov. 9, when by a mandamus, Christ. Stalham and Rob. Bene were chosen, but after Christmas, Mr. Wasey and Bene were willing to fine, and paid 60l. apiece, and Mr. Larwood was fined by the judges 5 marks, and left to be fined again by the court at Norwich, if he refused serving, on being chosen again.
Oct. 25, a conveyance was made by Mr. Stevenson, heir to alderman Tooley, of all his interest in the two closes without (St. Giles'sgates) of the gift of Sir John Pettus, to the 12 youngest aldermen, which closes were then leased at 20l. per annum.
In 1694, Queen Mary died of the small-pox at Kensington, Dec. 28; her funeral was on March 5, when by command the great bell of every parish throughout all England was tolled three several hours, viz. from 9 in the morning to 10, from 2 to 3, and from 5 to 6 in the evening.
On the 24th of August, the court acquainted the executors of Mr. Rich. Ireland, clerk, that they had resolved to sue him for the money given to the city and hospitals by his will.

### Burgesses In Parliament

* 1688, Convention at Westm. Thomas Blofield, Esq. Sir Nevile Catlyn, Knt. dissolved Feb. 6.
* 1689, Parliament at Westm. Thomas Blofield, Esq. Hugh Bokenham, alderman, sat on March 20.
* Dec. 1694, John Ward, Esq. mayor, chosen to serve in parliament in the room of Hugh Bokenham, Esq. deceased.