OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# HKSAR v. Xu Shengqi/Judgement

Layout 2
HCCC90/2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CRIMINAL CASE NO. 90 OF 2010
HKSAR
v
Xu Shengqi
| Before: | Hon D Pang J |
| Date: | 23 November 2010 at 4.43 pm |
| Present: | Mr P S Chapman, on fiat, and Ms Lily Wong, PP of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR Mr Chan Fei-nai, Finny, instructed by Messrs Lo, Wong & Tsui, assigned by the Director of Legal Aid, for the Accused |
| Offence: | (1)–(4) Murder (謀殺) |
Transcript of the Audio Recording of the Sentence in the above Case
COURT: Xu Shenggqi, stand up.
Defendant, within a short time, a whole family was wiped out by you: a couple in their 40s and 30s, and their two daughters, aged 10 and 7.
The ways in which they met their deaths were brutal and deliberate, the details of which have been repeated time and again during the trial.
Be that as it may, you have advanced the most ridiculous of defences, at least in relation to the woman and her two children. You said they had died of accident.
No qualified plea of guilty was ever given to any of the four charges of murder before or during these proceedings, which only goes to show that you have not the slightest hint of remorse for what you had done to your victims, who happened to be your cousin and your cousin’s family.
For Count 1, Count 2 and Count 4, three guilty verdicts of murder, you are sentenced to three concurrent terms of life imprisonment. That is mandatory under law.
​For Count 3, one guilty verdict of manslaughter by unlawful act, you are sentenced to 9 years’ imprisonment.
All sentences are to be served concurrently.
# Grayson v. Harris

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Grayson v. Harris."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Grayson v. Harris (267 U.S. 352)
* Grayson v. Harris (279 U.S. 300)
# Grayson v. Harris (279 U.S. 300)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
279 U.S. 300
Grayson v. Harris (279 U.S. 300)
Argued: Jan. 10, 1929. --- Decided: April 8, 1929
Messrs. Streeter B. Flynn and Robert M. Rainey, both of Oklahoma City, Okl., for petitioners.
Mr. Robert F. Blair, of Tulsa, Okl., for respondents.
Mr. Justice SANFORD delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Grayned v. City of Rockford
## Concurrence/Dissent

    Douglas
Supreme Court of the United States
408 U.S. 104
Grayned v. City of Rockford
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Illinois
No. 70-5106. Argued: January 19, 1972 --- Decided: June 26, 1972
1. Antipicketing ordinance, virtually identical with one invalidated as violative of equal protection in Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley, ante, p. 92, is likewise invalid. P. 107.
2. Antinoise ordinance prohibiting a person while on grounds adjacent to a building in which a school is in session from willfully making a noise or diversion that disturbs or tends to disturb the peace or good order of the school session is not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad. The ordinance is not vague since, with fair warning, it prohibits only actual or imminent, and willful, interference with normal school activity, and is not a broad invitation to discriminatory enforcement. Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 536; Coates v. Cincinnati, 402 U.S. 611, distinguished. The ordinance is not overbroad as unduly interfering with First Amendment rights since expressive activity is prohibited only if it "materially disrupts classwork." Tinker v. Des Moines School District, 393 U.S. 503; 513. Pp. 107-121.
46 Ill. 2d 492, 263 N.E. 2d 866, affirmed in part and reversed in part.
MARSHALL, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and BRENNAN, STEWART, WHITE, POWELL, and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined. BLACKMUN, J., filed a statement joining in the judgment and in Part I of the Court's opinion and concurring in the result as to Part II of the opinion, post, p. 121. DOUGLAS, J., filed an opinion dissenting in part and joining in Part I of the Court's opinion, post, p. 121.
Sophia H. Hall argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs were William R. Ming, Jr., and Aldus S. Mitchell.
William E. Collins argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were A. Curtis Washburn and Charles F. Thomas.
# Grayson v. Harris (267 U.S. 352)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
267 U.S. 352
Grayson v. Harris
Argued: Jan. 16, 1925. --- Decided: March 2, 1925
Messrs. Robert M. Rainey and Streeter B. Flynn, both of Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Robert F. Blair, of Tulsa, Okl., and George S. Ramsey, of Muskogee, Okl., for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hans and his Wife Grettel (Grimm/Taylor)

Collection of three Brothers Grimm stories: "Clever Grethel", "Clever Hans", and "The Lazy Spinner"
* "Hans and his Wife Grettel" in German Popular Stories (1826) (transcription project)
* "Hans and his Wife Grettel" in Grimm's Goblins (1876)
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Hans Rees' Sons v. North Carolina ex rel. Maxwell

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
283 U.S. 123
Hans Rees' Sons v. North Carolina ex rel. Maxwell
Argued: March 18, 1931. --- Decided: April 13, 1931
[Syllabus from pages 123-124 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Louis H. Porter and F. Carroll Taylor, both of New York City, for appellant.
Mr. Dennis G. Brummitt, of Raleigh, N. C., for appellee.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Green v. Watkins

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
19 U.S. 260
Green v. Watkins
March 1st.
Mr. B. Hardin, for the defendant in error, moved to dismiss the writ of error in this case, which was a real action, upon a suggestion of the death of the demandant and plaintiff in error, pending the proceedings in this Court. He insisted that, at common law, the death of either party, any time before final judgment, would have abated the suit; (Tidd's Pr. 1024; Bac. Abr. tit. Abatement); that the judiciary act of 1789, c. 20. s. 31. made no provision for this case, since it merely extended to the case of the death of parties, in personal actions, before judgment; and that the statute 17 Car. II. c. 8. and the act of Kentucky, showed the sense of Parliament and the local legislature, that real actions abated by the death of the parties, before judgment, upon writ of error on judgments already rendered.
Mr. Justice STORY delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Green v. Virginia

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
378 U.S. 550
Green v. Virginia
Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and Roland D. Ealey, for petitioners.
Reno S. Harp III, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Virginia, for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Green v. Virginia/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
378 U.S. 550
Green v. Virginia
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgments are vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for consideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244, 83 S.Ct. 1119, 10 L.Ed.2d 323, and Robinson v. Florida, 378 U.S. 153, 84 S.Ct. 1693.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS would reverse outright on the basis of the views expressed in his opinion in Bell v. Maryland, 378 U.S. 242, 84 S.Ct. 1823.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Harper's Magazine

Harper's Magazine is a monthly magazine of literature, politics, culture, finance, and the arts. Launched in New York City in June 1850 as Harper's New Monthly Magazine, it is the oldest continuously published monthly magazine in the United States.
* Harper's Magazine/"A Morris for May-Day"
* Harper's Magazine/"The City of Beautiful Towers"
* Harper's Magazine/'Who Laughs Last'
* Harper's Magazine/A Californian
* Harper's Magazine/A Chance Samaritan
* Harper's Magazine/A Conflict Ended
* Harper's Magazine/A Rural Telephone
* Harper's Magazine/Michel and Angele
* Harper's Magazine/Michel and Angele/Chapter 1
* Harper's Magazine/Michel and Angele/Chapter 10
* Harper's Magazine/Michel and Angele/Chapter 11
* Harper's Magazine/Michel and Angele/Chapter 12
* Harper's Magazine/Michel and Angele/Chapter 13
* Harper's Magazine/Michel and Angele/Chapter 2
* Harper's Magazine/Michel and Angele/Chapter 3
* Harper's Magazine/Michel and Angele/Chapter 4
* Harper's Magazine/Michel and Angele/Chapter 5
* Harper's Magazine/Michel and Angele/Chapter 6
* Harper's Magazine/Michel and Angele/Chapter 7
* Harper's Magazine/Michel and Angele/Chapter 8
* Harper's Magazine/Michel and Angele/Chapter 9
* Harper's Magazine/The Apple of Venus
* Harper's Magazine/The Mysterious Envelope
* Harper's Magazine/The Ultimate Master
* Harper's Magazine/Vol. XLIV/No. 260/January 1872/Holland and the Hollanders
* Harper's Magazine/Vol. XLIV/No. 261/February 1872/Editor's Scientific Record/Acridine, a New Anthracene Derivative
* Harper's Magazine/Vol. XLIV/No. 261/February 1872/Editor's Scientific Record/Cure of Flatulence
* Harper's Magazine/Vol. XLIV/No. 261/February 1872/Editor's Scientific Record/Explosion of Gun-Cotton at Stowmarket
* Harper's Magazine/Vol. XLVI/No. 272/January 1873/Christmas Throughout Christendom
* Harper's Magazine/Volume 101/Issue 601/The Singing of a Bird
* Harper's Magazine/Volume 107/Issue 641/A Town Guest
* Harper's Magazine/Volume 108/A Dog's Tale
* Harper's Magazine/Volume 108/Peire Vidal—Troubadour
* Harper's Magazine/Volume 81/Issue 482/A Poetess
* Harper's Magazine/Volume 81/Issue 484/The Revolt of 'Mother'
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Harper's Bazaar/Young People's Pride

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Commons category, Wikidata item.
As serialized in Harper's Bazar, 1922 June to September.
“You really want a story?” Elinor's voice was reticently mocking.
{{bc|max-width=500px|
YOUNG PEOPLE'S PRIDE
By STEPHEN VINCENT BENÉT
Illustrated by Henry Raleigh
“... For there groweth in great abundance in this land a small flower, much blown about by winds, named 'Young People's Pride'....”—Dycer's Herbal.
* Part I
* Part II
* Part III
* Part IV
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1943, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 80 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hark Hark

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Hark Hark."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Hark Hark (the dogs do bark)", traditional nursery rhyme
* "Hark! Hark!", a poem by Leonora Speyer
# Hark, Hark! The Dogs Do Bark

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Hark, Hark! The Dogs Do Bark."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Hark, Hark! The Dogs Do Bark", traditional nursery rhyme
* "Hark! Hark! The Dogs Do Bark!", satirical poster by Walter Emanuel
# Hark, Hark! The Dogs Do Bark (nursery rhyme)

"Hark, Hark! The Dogs Do Bark" is an English nursery rhyme. Its origins are uncertain and researchers have attributed it to various dates ranging from the late 11th century to the early 18th century. The rhyme appears in the Roud Folk Song Index as entry 19,689
* "Hark! hark! the dogs do bark" in The Crooked Man And Other Rhymes (1851)
* "Hark! hark! the dogs do bark" in A Book of Nursery Songs and Rhymes by Sabine Baring-Gould (1895)
* "Hark, hark! The dogs do bark" in A Book of Nursery Rhymes by Charles Welsh (1901)
* "Hark, hark, The dogs do bark" in The Nursery Rhymes of Mother Goose by Arthur Rackham (St. Nicholas, 1913)

### See also

* "Last Night the Dogs Did Bark", a related song
# Harkin v. Brundage

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
276 U.S. 36
Harkin v. Brundage
Argued: Dec. 5 and 6, 1927. --- Decided: Feb 20, 1928
[Syllabus from pages 36-38 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Lioyd C. Whitman and Bernhardt Frank, both of Chicago, Ill., for petitioners.
Messrs. Edward R. Johnston, Ralph F. Potter, and Henry Jackson Darby, all of Chicago, Ill., for respondents.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hark! The Herald Angels Sing

* related portals: Hymns, Christmas.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
"Hark! The Herald Angels Sing", originally titled "Hymn for Christmas-Day", is a Christmas carol by Charles Wesley. It was first published in Hymns and Sacred Poems in 1739, and was subsequently altered slightly by several authors including George Whitefield.
Wesley originally intended the hymn to be sung to the anonymous tune Easter Hymn (often credited to John Worgan), but it is nearly always sung instead to the tune Mendelssohn. This latter was written by Felix Mendelssohn for the cantata Festgesang, and was adapted to fit the hymn lyrics by William H. Cummings.
* "Hymn for Christmas Day", original text by Charles Wesley (1739).
* "Emanuel", broadside printing (19th century).
* "Herald Angels", broadside printing (19th century).
* "Christmas Day" in Our American Holidays - Christmas (1907).
* "Hark! the Herald Angels Sing" in The Army and Navy Hymnal (1920).
* "Hark! the Herald Angels Sing" in The Child's Own Music Book, (1918).
# Hark! the Vesper Hymn is Stealing

from The works of Thomas Moore vol. 4 - National Airs
I. Hark ! the vesper hymn is stealing, O’er the waters soft and clear; Nearer yet and nearer pealing, Jubilate, Amen. Farther now, now farther stealing, Soft it fades upon the ear, Jubilate, Amen.
II. Now, like moonlight waves retreating To the shore, it dies along; Now, like angry surges meeting, Breaks the mingled tide of song. Jubilate, Amen. Hush ! again, like waves, retreating To the shore, it dies along, Jubilate, Amen.
# Hark, Hark! The Lark

Song from Cymbeline, Act 2, scene 3.

### Versions in Cymbeline

See Cymbeline for list of editions.

### Other versions

* "Hark, Hark! The Lark" in Shakespeare's Songs, (ed.) by Arthur Henry Bullen (1907).
* "Aubade" in the Oxford Book of English Verse 1250-1900 (ed.) by Arthur Quiller-Couch (1931).
* "Aubade" in the Oxford Book of English Verse 1250-1918 (ed.) by Arthur Quiller-Couch (1940).
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Harkness v. Hyde

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
98 U.S. 476
Harkness v. Hyde
ERROR to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Idaho.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. George H. Williams for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. R. P. Lowe for the defendant in error.
MR. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Halsell v. Renfrow Railroad J

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
202 U.S. 287
Halsell v. Renfrow Railroad J
Argued: April 20, 1906. --- Decided: May 14, 1906

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Halsted v. Buster

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Halsted v. Buster."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Halsted v. Buster (119 U.S. 341)
* Halsted v. Buster (140 U.S. 273)
# History of Mexico (Bancroft)/Volume 5

Table of Contents
THE WORKS
OF
HUBERT HOWE BANCROFT
VOLUME XIII.
HISTORY OF MEXICO.
Vol. V. 1824-1861.
SAN FRANCISCO: A. L. BANCROFT & COMPANY PUBLISHERS 1885
Entered according to Act of Congress in the Year 1885, by
HUBERT H. BANCROFT,
In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.
All Rights Reserved.
# History of Mexico (Bancroft)/Volume 4/List of Authorities

Contents
LIST OF AUTHORITIES
# He is a Cock would

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
From Notebook c.1808-1811 p.29. See also: Satiric verses and epigrams.

#### Edited text:

He is a Cock would… And would be a Cock if he could…
________________________________________

#### The original text:

He is a Cock would And would be a Cock if he could
________________________________________

## Notes

Written sideways on page 29 in the Notebook, probably between 1803 and 1804 (however G. Keynes placed it into the section 1808-1811). In August 1803 Private Cock (trooper) supported the John Scoffield's (Capt. Leathes's troop of 1st or Royal Dragoons) accusation and charge of sedition against Blake, however after the Sussex Assizes in January 1804 (in Chichester) Blake was acquitted. G. Keynes thought that the couplet is not completed and added suspension points at the ends of the both lines.
* ↑ "Blake Complete Writings", ed. Geoffrey Keynes, pub. OUP 1966/85, p. 540.
* ↑ "The Complete Poetry & Prose of William Blake", ed. by David V. Erdman, Anchor Books, 1988, p. 503.
* ↑ [wont del.]
* ↑ [Crow del.]
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# He never smiled again

* He Never Smil'd Again, in The Literary Gazette, 1824.
* He never smiled again, in The Forest Sanctuary, and Other Poems (Lays of Many Lands), 1825.
# He and She

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "He and She."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "He and She", song from Ruddigore by Arthur S. Sullivan and W. S. Gilbert
* "He and She", poem by Frances Fuller Victor
# He ate and drank the precious Words—

* "A Book" in Poems (1890)
* "He ate and drank the precious words" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# He fumbles at your Soul

He fumbles at your Soul As Players at the Keys Before they drop full Music on — He stuns you by degrees — Prepares your brittle Nature For the Ethereal Blow By fainter Hammers — further heard — Then nearer — Then so slow Your Breath has time to straighten — Your Brain — to bubble Cool — Deals — One — imperial — Thunderbolt — That scalps your naked Soul —
When Winds take Forests in the Paws — The Universe — is still —
# He preached upon "Breadth" till it argued him narrow—

* "The Preacher" in Poems: Second Series (1891)
* "He preached upon "breadth" till it argued him narrow" in The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson (1924)
# He and She (Victor)

Under the pines sat a young man and maiden
* "He and She" in The New Penelope (1877)
* "He and She" in Poems (1900)
# He has observd the Golden Rule

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
From Notebook c.1808-1811 p.30. See also: Satiric verses and epigrams.

#### Edited text:

He has observ'd the Golden Rule Till he's become the Golden Fool.
________________________________________

#### The original text:

He has observd the Golden Rule Till hes become the Golden Fool
________________________________________

## Notes

* ↑ "Blake Complete Writings", ed. Geoffrey Keynes, pub. OUP 1966/85, p. 540.
* ↑ "The Complete Poetry & Prose of William Blake", ed. by David V. Erdman, Anchor Books, 1988, p. 508.
* ↑ “He has observd the Golden Rule...” This epigram is written above of the heavily erased title and four subsequent lines that could be read as: The Golden Rule. ?Sporting with ?golden ?Fortune ?Blithe & gay Like to the Lion sporting with his prey With Fortune sporting Merry Blithe & gay Like to the Lion sporting with his prey a Sparrow — Ed. of Wikisource.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# He is alive, this morning—

He is alive, this morning — He is alive — and awake — Birds are resuming for Him — Blossoms — dress for His Sake. Bees — to their Loaves of Honey Add an Amber Crumb Him — to regale — Me — Only — Motion, and am dumb.