OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Flint and Feather (1914)/Part 1/Fasting

FASTING
'Tis morning now, yet silently I stand, Uplift the curtain with a weary hand, Look out while darkness overspreads the way, And long for day.
Calm peace is frighted with my mood to-night, Nor visits my dull chamber with her light, To guide my senses into her sweet rest And leave me blest.
Long hours since the city rocked and sung Itself to slumber: only the stars swung Aloft their torches in the midnight skies With watchful eyes.
No sound awakes; I, even, breathe no sigh, Nor hear a single footstep passing by; Yet I am not alone, for now I feel A presence steal
Within my chamber walls; I turn to see The sweetest guest that courts humanity; With subtle, slow enchantment draws she near, And Sleep is here.
What care I for the olive branch of Peace? Kind Sleep will bring a thrice-distilled release, Nepenthes, that alone her mystic hand Can understand.
And so she bends, this welcome sorceress, To crown my fasting with her light caress. Ah, sure my pain will vanish at the bliss Of her warm kiss.
But still my duty lies in self-denial; I must refuse sweet Sleep, although the trial Will reawaken all my depth of pain. So once again
I lift the curtain with a weary hand, With more than sorrow, silently I stand, Look out while darkness overspreads the way, And long for day.
"Go, Sleep," I say, "before the darkness die, To one who needs you even more than I, For I can bear my part alone, but he Has need of thee.
"His poor tired eyes in vain have sought relief, His heart more tired still, with all its grief; His pain is deep, while mine is vague and dim, Go thou to him.
"When thou hast fanned him with thy drowsy wings, And laid thy lips upon the pulsing strings
That in his soul with fret and fever burn, To me return."
She goes. The air within the quiet street Reverberates to the passing of her feet; I watch her take her passage through the gloom To your dear home.
Belovéd, would you knew how sweet to me Is this denial, and how fervently I pray that Sleep may lift you to her breast, And give you rest—
A privilege that she alone can claim. Would that my heart could comfort you the same, But in the censer Sleep is swinging high, All sorrows die.
She comes not back, yet all my miseries Wane at the thought of your calm sleeping eyes— Wane, as I hear the early matin bell The dawn foretell.
And so, dear heart, still silently I stand, Uplift the curtain with a weary hand, The long, long night has bitter been and lone, But now 'tis gone.
Dawn lights her candles in the East once more, And darkness flees her chariot before; The Lenten morning breaks with holy ray, And it is day!
# Flint and Feather (1914)/Part 1/In the Shadows

IN THE SHADOWS
I am sailing to the leeward, Where the current runs to seaward Soft and slow, Where the sleeping river grasses Brush my paddle as it passes To and fro.
On the shore the heat is shaking All the golden sands awaking In the cove; And the quaint sand-piper, winging O'er the shallows, ceases singing When I move.
On the water's idle pillow Sleeps the overhanging willow, Green and cool; Where the rushes lift their burnished Oval heads from out the tarnished Emerald pool.
Where the very silence slumbers, Water lilies grow in numbers, Pure and pale; All the morning they have rested, Amber crowned, and pearly crested, Fair and frail.
Here, impossible romances, Indefinable sweet fancies, Cluster round; But they do not mar the sweetness Of this still September fleetness With a sound.
I can scarce discern the meeting Of the shore and stream retreating, So remote; For the laggard river, dozing, Only wakes from its reposing Where I float.
Where the river mists are rising, All the foliage baptizing With their spray; There the sun gleams far and faintly, With a shadow soft and saintly, In its ray.
And the perfume of some burning Far-off brushwood, ever turning To exhale All its smoky fragrance dying, In the arms of evening lying, Where I sail.
My canoe is growing lazy, In the atmosphere so hazy, While I dream; Half in slumber I am guiding, Eastward indistinctly gliding Down the stream.
# Flint and Feather (1914)/Part 1/Close By

CLOSE BY
So near at hand (our eyes o'erlooked its nearness In search of distant things) A dear dream lay—perchance to grow in dearness Had we but felt its wings Astir. The air our very breathing fanned It was so near at hand.
Once, many days ago, we almost held it, The love we so desired; But our shut eyes saw not, and fate dispelled it Before our pulses fired To flame, and errant fortune bade us stand Hand almost touching hand.
I sometimes think had we two been discerning, The by-path hid away From others' eyes had then revealed its turning To us, nor led astray Our footsteps, guiding us into love's land That lay so near at hand.
So near at hand, dear heart, could we have known it! Throughout those dreamy hours, Had either loved, or loving had we shown it, Response had sure been ours;
We did not know that heart could heart command, And love so near at hand!
What then availed the red wine's subtle glisten? We passed it blindly by, And now what profit that we wait and listen Each for the other's heart beat? Ah! the cry Of love o'erlooked still lingers, you and I Sought heaven afar, we did not understand 'Twas—once so near at hand.
# Flint and Feather (1914)/Part 1/Marshlands

MARSHLANDS
A thin wet sky, that yellows at the rim, And meets with sun-lost lip the marsh's brim.
The pools low lying, dank with moss and mould, Glint through their mildews like large cups of gold.
Among the wild rice in the still lagoon, In monotone the lizard shrills his tune.
The wild goose, homing, seeks a sheltering, Where rushes grow, and oozing lichens cling.
Late cranes with heavy wing, and lazy flight, Sail up the silence with the nearing night.
And like a spirit, swathed in some soft veil, Steals twilight and its shadows o'er the swale.
Hushed lie the sedges, and the vapours creep, Thick, grey and humid, while the marshes sleep.
# First Methodist Church of San Leandro v. Horstmann/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
357 U.S. 568
First Methodist Church of San Leandro v. Horstmann
The judgment is reversed. First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. County of Los Angeles et al., (Valley Unitarian-Universalist Church, Inc., v. County of Los Angeles et al.), 357 U.S. 545, 78 S.Ct. 1350; Speiser v. Randall (Prince v. City and County of San Francisco), 357 U.S. 513, 78 S.Ct. 1332, decided this day.
Mr. Justice CLARK dissents for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in 357 U.S. 545, 78 S.Ct. 1350, decided this day.
The CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First Methodist Church of San Leandro v. Horstmann

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
357 U.S. 568
First Methodist Church of San Leandro v. Horstmann
Messrs.Stanley A. Weigel, Lawrence Speiser and Frank B. Frederick, for appellants.
Mr. J. F. Coakley, for appellees.
Mr. Arthur M. Carden, for appellee City of San Leandro.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First Nat Bank v. Stewart

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
107 U.S. 676
First Nat Bank v. Stewart
John Little, for plaintiff in error.
Geo. Hoadly, E. M. Johnson, and Edwd. Colston, for defendants in error.
FIELD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First National Bank Of Denver Colorado & v. John Klug

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
186 U.S. 202
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF DENVER, COLORADO, First National Bank of York, Nebraska, and Harris & Company, Appts., v. JOHN P. KLUG and Charles H. Wheeler.
Argued: May 5, 1902. --- Decided: June 2, 1902
Messrs. Charles J. Greene, Ralph W. Breckenridge, and George L. Hodges for appellants.
Mr. John F. Shafroth for appellees.
Mr. Chief Justice Fuller delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First National Bank Trust Company of Bridgeport v. Beach

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
301 U.S. 435
First National Bank Trust Company of Bridgeport v. Beach
Argued: April 27, 28, 1937. --- Decided: May 17, 1937
Mr. Arthur B. Weiss, of Bridgeport, Conn., for petitioner.
Mr. Sydney P. Simons, of Bridgeport, Conn., for respondent.
Mr. Justice CARDOZO delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First National Bank in Plant City v. Dickinson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinions

    Douglas
    Stewart
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 122
First National Bank in Plant City v. Dickinson
Argued: Oct. 16, 1969. --- Decided: Dec 9, 1969
See 396 U.S. 1047, 90 S.Ct. 677.
[Syllabus from pages 122-123 intentionally omitted]
James van R. Springer, Washington, D.C., and Robert S. Edwards, Plant City, Fla., for petitioners.
William Reece Smith, Jr., Tampa, Fla., and V. Carroll Webb, Tallahassee, Fla., for respondents.
James F. Bell, Washington, D.C., for National Association of Supervisors of State Banks, as amicus curiae, by special leave of Court.
Mr. Chief Justice BURGER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# First Nat Bank v. Stewart/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
107 U.S. 676
First Nat Bank v. Stewart
Section 5201 of the Revised Statutes declares that 'no association shall make any loan or discount on the security of the shares of its own capital stock, nor be the purchaser or holder of any such shares, unless such security or purchase shall be necessary to prevent loss upon a debt previously contracted in good faith, and stock so purchased or acquired shall, within six months from the time of its purchase, be sold or disposed of at public or private sale; or, in default thereof, a receiver may be appointed to close up the business of the association.' While this section in terms prohibits a banking association from making a loan upon the security of shares of its own stock, it imposes no penalty, either upon the bank or borrower, if a loan upon such security be made. If, therefore, the prohibition can be urged against the validity of the transaction by any one except the government, it can only be done before the contract is executed, while the security is still subsisting in the hands of the bank. It can then, if at all, be invoked to restrain or defeat the enforcement of the security. When the contract has been executed, the security sold, and the proceeds applied to the payment of the debt, the courts will not interfere with the matter. Both bank and borrower are in such case equally the subjects of legal censure, and they will be left by the courts where they have placed themselves. There is another view of this case. The deceased authorized the bank, in a certain contingency, to sell his shares. Supposing it was unlawful for the bank to take those shares as security for a loan, it was not unlawful to authorize the bank to sell them when the contingency occurred. The shares being sold pursuant to the authority, the proceeds would be in the bank as his property. Ths administrators, indeed, affirm the validity of that sale by suing for the proceeds. As against the deceased, however, the money loaned was an offset to the proceeds. In either view the administrators cannot recover.
The judgment of the court, therefore, must be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial; and it is so ordered.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Fogg v. Blair

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Fogg v. Blair."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Fogg v. Blair (133 U.S. 534)
* Fogg v. Blair (139 U.S. 118)
# Foggerty's Fairy and Other Tales

Foggerty's Fairy
AND OTHER TALES
BY
W. S. GILBERT
LONDON
GEORGE ROUTLEDGE AND SONS
BROADWAY, LUDGATE HILL
GLASGOW MANCHESTER, AND NEW YORK
1890
LONDON:
BRADBURY, AGNEW, & CO., PRINTERS, WHITEFRIARS.
NOTE.
This Book contains several Tales upon which the Author subsequently founded plays, which achieved more or less success. "Foggerty's Fairy" is the groundwork of a play of that name, which was produced six years since at the Criterion Theatre. "An Elixir of Love" is the basis of "The Sorcerer." "Creatures of Impulse," "The Wicked World," and "Comedy and Tragedy," in their original forms, will also be found in this book. None of the Tales, except "Comedy and Tragedy," were written with a view to subsequent dramatization.
W. S. GILBERT.
CONTENTS.
PAGE
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Forever honored by the Tree

Forever honored by the Tree Whose Apple Winterworn Enticed to Breakfast from the Sky Two Gabriels Yestermorn.
They registered in Nature's Book As Robins — Sire and Son — But Angels have that modest way To screen them from Renown.
# Forged Steel Wheel Company v. Lewellyn

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
251 U.S. 511
Forged Steel Wheel Company v. Lewellyn
Argued: Jan. 8 and 9, 1920. --- Decided: March 1, 1920
Messrs.
George B. Gordon, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and George Sutherland, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for petitioner.
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Frierson, for respondent.
Mr. Justice McKENNA delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Forester

* Forester in May-day and other pieces (1867)
* Forester in Poems (Household Edition, 1904)
# Forever Here My Rest Shall Be

Forever here my rest shall be, Close to Thy bleeding side; This all my hope, and all my plea, For me the Savior died!
My dying Savior, and my God, Fountain for guilt and sin, Sprinkle me ever with Thy blood, And cleanse, and keep me clean.
Wash me, and make me thus Thine own, Wash me, and mine Thou art, Wash me, but not my feet alone, My hands, my head, my heart.
The atonement of Thy blood apply, Till faith to sight improve, Till hope in full fruition die, And all my soul be love.
I do believe, I now believe, That Jesus died for me; And through His blood, His precious blood, I shall from sin be free.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Forgay v. Conrad

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
47 U.S. 201
Forgay v. Conrad
THIS was an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana.
The facts in the case are set forth in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Sergeant moved to dismiss the appeal, because the decree of the court below was not final, and because the appeal was not regularly brought up. On the second point, he said that there were several defendants, one only of whom had appealed. But all the parties must join. 7 Peters, 399. He referred the court, however, upon this point, to Todd v. Daniel, 16 Peters, 521. A case must not come up in fragments. 3 Peters, 307; 3 Dall. 188.
To show that the decree was not final, he referred to The Palmyra, 10 Wheat. 502; Chace v. Vasquez, 11 Wheat. 429; Brown v. Swann, 9 Peters, 1; Young v. Grundy, 6 Cranch, 51; Rutherford v. Fisher, 4 Dall. 22; Lea v. Kelly, 1 Peters, 213; Young v. Smith, 12 Peters, 287.
Mr. May, contra.
Against the motion to dismiss, it is submitted,--
1st. There are proper parties to this appeal.
The appellants have separate and distinct interests, and the decree is several. Todd v. Daniel, 16 Peters, 523; McDonough v. Dannery, 3 Dallas, 188, 193, 198.
On order of court. The petition for an appeal by appellants alone is found in the record, p. 198. This was notice to the other defendants below of the appeal.
2d. The decree is final.
It decides the title of all the property in dispute, decrees that it be delivered up to the complainant, and that execution issue, &c. Wilson v. Daniel, 3 Dallas, 404. The whole law of the case, so far as the appellants are concerned, is settled by the decree; nothing is left to be done but the ministerial duty of stating an account, which in this case is in the nature of an execution to carry out the decree; the principles of the account are prescribed. It is like the case of Ray v. Law, 3 Cranch, 179 (explained in 10 Wheaton, 503). Whiting v. Bank of the United States, 13 Peters, 15.
Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Flanders v. Tweed (82 U.S. 450)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
82 U.S. 450
Flanders v. Tweed
ERROR to the Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana, in which court Tweed sued Flanders, deputy general agent of the Treasury Department of the United States, to recover damages caused by an alleged unlawful seizure and detention of certain cotton of his, Tweed's. Judgment being given for the plaintiff the treasury agent appealed.
Mr. S. F. Phillips, Solicitor-General, for the plaintiff in error; Mr. T. D. Lincoln, contra.
Mr. Justice CLIFFORD stated the case, and delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Flanigan v. Sierra

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
196 U.S. 553
Flanigan v. Sierra
Argued: January 12, 1905. --- Decided: February 20, 1905
Messrs.
C. C. Cole, Joseph C. Campbell, and Thomas H. Breeze for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 553-555 intentionally omitted]
Messrs.Frank R. Wehe, C. N. Post, and W. J. Redding for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 555-557 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Flanigan v. Turner

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
66 U.S. 491
Flanigan v. Turner
This was an admiralty suit in personam, commenced by the libel of Andrew Flanigan, John S. Beacham, George P. Beacham, Lenox Beacham, and Samuel Beacham, partners trading as A. Flanigan & Co., against Robert Turner, owner of the steamboat Susquehannah, in the District Court of the United States for the district of Maryland. The libellants claimed $2,762 for work done and materials furnished in repairs to the Susquehannah at the request of Turner, who was either owner or agent for the owner. Turner answered that Flanigan & Co. were joint owners of the boat with him and others, and, therefore, had no right to recover against him for the work. He also alleged and showed that a bill was pending in a State court, brought by himself against these libellants and others, to dissolve the partnership, sell the vessel, and after paying expenses, &c., divide the proceeds ratably among the several owners. This cause was then suspended until that in the State court should be decided. The last mentioned proceeding went on, the vessel was sold under it, and Turner claimed the proceeds as sole owner; the other parties consented, and the court so ordered. The present cause was then pressed in the District Court, and a decree made there in favor of the libellants for the amount found to be due for their work and materials-$2,665 73, with interest from 1st July, 1857, and costs. Turner, the respondent, appealed to the Circuit Court, where the decree was changed to $2,827 88. Turner appealed to the Supreme Court, and attempted to reverse the decree of the Circuit Court upon the grounds which will be found stated in the opinion of Judge Nelson.
Mr. Barrol, of Maryland, for respondent.
Mr. Perrine, of Maryland, for libellants.
Mr. Justice NELSON.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Flannelly v. Delaware & Hudson Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
225 U.S. 597
Flannelly v. Delaware & Hudson Company
Argued: December 19 and 20, 1911. --- Decided: June 10, 1912
Messrs. Frank W. Hackett and Paul J. Sherwood for petitioners.
[Argument of Counsel from page 598 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. James H. Torrey, W. S. Opdyke, and Lewis E. Carr for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 599-601 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice Van Devanter delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckler

* related portals: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion MacKinnon
* 756 F.2d 143
* FOUNDATION ON ECONOMIC TRENDS, et al.
* v.
* Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, et al., Regents of the University of California, a Corporation, Appellant
* No. 84-5314, 84-5419
* United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
* December 5, 1984, Argued
* February 27, 1985, Decided
J. Carol Williams, Dept. of Justice, Washington, District of Columbia, Joseph E. diGenova, U.S. Atty., Judith Bartnoff, Asst. U.S. Atty., and Martin W. Matzen, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, District of Columbia, for federal Appellants.
William A. Anderson, III, Washington, District of Columbia, Darci L. Rock, Washington, District of Columbia, for Appellant Regents of the University of California.
Edward Lee Rogers, New York, New York, for Appellees Foundation on Economic Trends et al.
Sheldon E. Steinbach, Washington, District of Columbia, for Amici Curiae American Council on Education et al., urging reversal.
Wright and Mikva, Circuit Judges, and MacKinnon, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge J. Skelly Wright. Concurring opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge MacKinnon.