OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures (1898)

* related portals: Christian Science.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
* Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
* John viii. 32.
* There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.
* Shakespeare.
* I, I, I, I itself, I,
* The inside and outside, the what and the why,
* The when and the where, the low and the high,
* All I, I, I, I itself, I.
* Anonymous.
CONTENTS.
| Chapter | Chapter | Page |
| I. | Science, Theology, Medicine | 1 |
| II. | Physiology | 58 |
| III. | Footsteps of Truth | 97 |
| IV. | Creation | 151 |
| V. | Science of Being | 164 |
| VI. | Christian Science and Spiritualism | 236 |
| VII. | Marriage | 266 |
| VIII. | Animal Magnetism | 280 |
| IX. | Some Objections Answered | 287 |
| X. | Prayer | 307 |
| XI. | Atonement and Eucharist | 323 |
| XII. | Christian Science Practice | 361 |
| XIII. | Teaching Christian Science | 440 |
| XIV. | Recapitulation | 461 |
| KEY TO THE SCRIPTURES. |||
| XV. | Genesis | 495 |
| XVI. | Apocalypse | 550 |
| XVII. | Glossary | 570 |
| Index | Index | 593 |
SCIENCE AND HEALTH
WITH
KEY TO THE SCRIPTURES.
BY
MARY BAKER G. EDDY,
PRESIDENT OF MASSACHUSETTS METAPHYSICAL COLLEGE.
ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY-SIXTH EDITION.
BOSTON: PUBLISHED BY JOSEPH ARMSTRONG, C. S. D. 95 Falmouth Street. 1898.
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1875, by
Mary Baker Glover,
(now Mrs. Eddy,)
In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1885, by
Mary Baker G. Eddy,
In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.
Copyright, 1890,
By Mary Baker G. Eddy.
All rights reserved.
Copyright, 1894,
By Mary Baker G. Eddy.
All rights reserved.
University Press;
John Wilson and Son, Cambridge
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Royal Naval Biography/Popham, William

Layout 2
WILLIAM POPHAM, Esq. [Post-Captain of 1819.]
Eldest son of the late Rear-Admiral Sir Home Riggs Popham, K.C.B. who died at Cheltenham, Sept. 11, 1820.
This officer passed his examination in June, 1811; was made lieutenant, Feb. 14, 1812; advanced to the rank of commander, Dec. 23, 1814; and appointed acting captain of the Sybille frigate, bearing his father’s flag, on the Jamaica station, Feb. 2, 1819. This appointment was confirmed by the Admiralty, May 19th following.
Captain Popham commanded the Hecla bomb, at the battle of Algiers.
Agent.– T. Collier, Esq.
# Royal Naval Biography/Powell, Herbert Brace

Layout 2
HERBERT BRACE POWELL, Esq. [Post-Captain of 1822.]
Is a native of Leominster, co. Hereford; and nephew to Captain Edward Brace, C.B. under whose protection he entered the navy, as midshipman on board the Kangaroo brig, in 1797. The actions in which he participated while his uncle commanded that vessel, have been described at pp. 254–257 of Vol. II. Part I.
After passing his examination for lieutenant, Mr. Powell was ordered out to Jamaica, on promotion; but on his way thither, he had the misfortune to be wrecked in the Apollo frigate. Captain John W. T. Dixon, April 2, 1804. The particulars of that melancholy event are detailed at pp. 362–365 of Suppl. Part II. His first commission bears date Jan. 26, 1805.
We next find this officer serving under Captain Brace in la Virginie of 46 guns, on the Irish station, where he assisted at the capture of the Dutch 36-gun frigate Guelderland and two Spanish privateers; also at the recapture of various British merchantmen, and in defending the Louisa hired tender, of four 3-pounders, against the French privateer Marsouin, of fourteen 6-pounders, for which latter service he received the thanks of the Admiralty.
About Oct. 1810, Mr. Powell was appointed with Captain Brace to the St. Albans 64, in which ship he soon afterwards sailed for the defence of Cadiz, where he continued as first lieutenant of her, distinguishing himself on many occasions, until the enemy abandoned their lines before that city and ​l’Isla de Leon, in, Aug. 1812. His promotion to the rank of commander took place June 15, 1814.
From this period we lose sight of Captain Powell until July 1816, when he embarked as a volunteer on board the Impregnable 104, which ship bore the flag of Rear-Admiral (now Sir David) Milne, and was commanded by Captain Brace, at the memorable battle of Algiers; on which occasion, her loss was infinitely greater than that sustained by any other ship belonging to the combined squadrons. In the midst of the sanguinary conflict. Captain Powell went with a message to Lord Exmouth, informing him how severely she was suffering, and requesting he would, if possible, send a frigate to divert some of the enemy’s fire from her. On his return, he was ordered by the rear-admiral to superintend the placing of an explosion-vessel close under the semicircular battery to the northward of the light-house, where she blew up, and, having been charged with 143 barrels of powder, must have operated very successfully as a diversion in favor of the dreadfully cut-up Impregnable.
Captain Powell was soon afterwards appointed to the Heron sloop, which vessel he commanded, chiefly on the Milford station, till Feb. 1819. His post commission bears date Dec. 26, 1822.
This officer lost a brother in the Hero 74, Captain James N. Newman, under whom he was serving as midshipman, when that ship perished on the Haak Sand, near the Texel, Dec. 25, 1811.
Agents.– Messrs. Atkins and Son.
* ↑ See Vol. II. Part I. p. 257.
* ↑ See Commander Joseph Hoy.
* ↑ See Vol. I. Part I. p. 227, and Vol. II. Part I. p. 260.
* ↑ >See Suppl. Part III. note * at p. 13.
# Royal Naval Biography/Poulett, George

Layout 2
HON. GEORGE POULETT. Receiver-General of the Land and Assessed Taxes in Somersetshire. [Post-Captain of 1806.]
Second son of John, 4th Earl Poulett, K.T. by Sophia, only daughter of the late Admiral Sir George Pocock, K.B., and brother to the present Earl.
This officer was born May 13, 1786; made a Lieutenant, April 3, 1804; advanced to the rank of Commander Oct. 12, 1805; and posted July 31, 1806. He subsequently commanded the Quebec frigate on the North Sea station.
Captain Poulett married, Dec. 9, 1811, Catherine Sophia, eldest daughter of Sir George Dallas, Bart.
# Royal Naval Biography/Popplewell, Matthew James

Layout 2
MATTHEW JAMES POPPLEWELL, Esq. [Commander.]
Son of the late Mr. Thomas Popplewell, a master in the royal navy. This officer was made a lieutenant on the 22d Jan. 1806; and advanced to his present rank Nov. 6th, 1813.
# Royal Naval Biography/Porter, Thomas

Layout 2
THOMAS PORTER, Esq. [Commander.]
Was made a lieutenant on the 27th July 1814; appointed to the Andromache 44, Captain William Henry Shirreff, fitting out for South America, Sept. 5th, 1817; removed to the Superb 78, bearing the broad pendant of Sir Thomas M. Hardy, commander-in-chief on that station. May 10th, 1821; and promoted to the command of the Alacrity sloop, Aug. 26th, 1822. He returned from Brazil to Portsmouth, bringing home 1,000,000 dollars, July 19th, 1823.
# Royal Naval Biography/Poulden, Richard

Layout 2
RICHARD POULDEN, Esq [Post-Captain of 1802.]
This officer was made a Lieutenant, Feb. 12, 1783, and obtained post rank, April 29, 1802. He has been principally employed in the Transport and Impress services.
# Royal Naval Biography/Porteous, John

Layout 2
JOHN PORTEOUS, Esq. [Post-Captain of 1814.]
A son of the late Mr. James Porteous, many years master of a royal yacht; and brother to Captain James Porteous, of H.M. packet Magnet.
This officer was made lieutenant, Jan. 22, 1806; and commander Mar. 3, 1808; successively appointed to the Gannet and Satellite, brigs, in 1812; and advanced to post rank, June 7, 1814.
Agent.– John Chippendale, Esq.
# Royal Naval Biography/Poyntz, Newdigate

Layout 2
NEWDIGATE POYNTZ, Esq. [Commander.]
Was made a lieutenant in Sept. 1807; and commander on the 19th Sept. 1815.
# Scribner's Magazine/Volume 27

Content exists for this periodical, though at this stage it is not specifically organised beyond a basic hierarchy.
The pages listed below are an automatically generated listing.
Special:PrefixIndex/Scribner's Magazine/Volume 27/
# San Juan Light Transit Company v. Requena

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
224 U.S. 89
San Juan Light Transit Company v. Requena
Argued: December 13, 1911. --- Decided: March 18, 1912
Messrs. Hugo Kohlmann, H. P. Leake, H. H. Scoville, and F. Kingsbury Curtis for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 90-93 intentionally omitted]
The court declined to hear Messrs. Willis Sweet and George H. Lamar for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Van Devanter delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# San Kuo

SAN KUO, OR ROMANCE OF THE THREE KINGDOMS
* Volume 1
* Volume 2
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Rhett v. Poe

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
43 U.S. 457
Rhett v. Poe

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rhode Island Hospital Trust Company v. Doughton

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
270 U.S. 69
Rhode Island Hospital Trust Company v. Doughton
Argued: Jan. 11, 1926. --- Decided: March 1, 1926
Messrs. John M. Robinson, of Charlotte, N. C., and W. R. Tillinghast and James C. Collins, both of Providence, R. I., for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 70-72 intentionally omitted]
Mr. D. G. Brummitt, of Oxford, N. C., for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 73-77 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rhine Song of the German Soldiers

* Rhine Song of the German Soldiers after Victory, in The Winter's Wreath, 1831.
* Rhine Song of the German Soldiers, in National Lyrics, and Songs for Music, 1834.
# Rhetoric (Freese)

1924 Loeb Classical Library

## Table of Contents

* Book I
* Book II
* Book III
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Rhetoric

English-language translations of Ῥητορική include:
* A Dissertation Upon Rhetoric - 1811 translation by Daniel Michael Crimmin
* Aristotle's teatrise on rhetoric - 1850 translation by Theodore Alois Buckley (1825–1856)
* Rhetoric - 1924 translation by W. Rhys Roberts (1858–1929) in the Works of Aristotle
* Rhetoric - 1924 translation by John Henry Freese (1852–1930)
# Smith v. Bennett

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Smith v. Bennett."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Smith v. Bennett (365 U.S. 708)
* Smith v. Bennett (369 U.S. 425)
# Smith v. Bennett (365 U.S. 708)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
365 U.S. 708
Smith v. Bennett
Argued: March 28, 1961. --- Decided: April 17, 1961
Mr. Luther L. Hill, Jr., Des Moines, Iowa, for petitioner in each case.
Mr. Evan Hultman, Waterloo, Iowa, for respondent in both cases.
Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Smith v. Ayer Smith

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
101 U.S. 320
Smith v. Ayer Smith
APPEALS from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
The first case was argued by Mr. H. G. Miller and Mr. T. G. Frost for the appellants, and by Mr. W. C. Goudy for the appellees.
The second case was argued by Mr. H. G. Miller, Mr. T. G. Frost, and Mr. P. C. Smith for the appellants, and by Mr C. C. Bonney for the appellees.
MR. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Smith v. Barry

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Scalia
United States Supreme Court
502 U.S. 244
Smith v. Barry
No. 90-7477 Argued: Dec. 2, 1991. --- Decided: Jan 14, 1992
Syllabus
Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure conditions federal appellate jurisdiction on the filing of a timely notice of appeal. In response to petitioner Smith's filing of a premature, and therefore invalid, notice of appeal in his action for damages against state officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Fourth Circuit's Clerk sent the parties copies of the "informal brief" that that court uses in pro se appeals and an explanatory order. Smith returned his informal brief within the deadline for filing a notice of appeal, but the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction, concluding, inter alia, that a brief can never be considered a notice of appeal.
Held: A document intended to serve as an appellate brief may qualify as the notice of appeal required by Rule 3. So long as such a document is filed within the time allowed by Rule 4 for a notice of appeal and satisfies Rule 3(c)'s requirements as to the content of such a notice, it may be treated as the "functional equivalent" of the formal notice demanded by Rule 3. Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co., 487 U.S. 312, 317, 108 S.Ct. 2405, 2409, 101 L.Ed.2d 285. The fact that Smith filed his informal brief in response to a briefing order is irrelevant, since it is the notice afforded by a document, not the litigant's motivation in filing it, that determines the document's sufficiency as a notice of appeal. Moreover, the fact that the Rules envision that the notice of appeal and the appellant's brief will be two separate filings does not preclude an appellate court from treating the brief as a notice of appeal in the appropriate circumstances. Rule 3(c) requires that an appeal not be dismissed for informality of form or title of the notice of appeal, and proper briefing is not a jurisdictional requirement under the Rules. The fact that Smith filed his brief with the Court of Appeals, rather than the District Court as required by Rule 3(a), is also irrelevant, since Rule 4(a)(1) sets out procedures to be followed when the notice of appeal is mistakenly filed with an appellate court. On remand, the Court of Appeals should determine whether Smith's brief contains the information required for a notice of appeal by Rule 3(c). Pp. 247-250.
919 F.2d 893 (CA4 1990), reversed and remanded.
O'CONNOR, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which REHNQUIST, C.J., and WHITE, BLACKMUN, STEVENS, KENNEDY, SOUTER, and THOMAS, JJ., joined. SCALIA, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment.
Steven H. Goldblatt, for petitioner.
David H. Bamberger, for respondents.
Justice O'CONNOR delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Smith v. Barry/Concurrence Scalia

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Scalia
Justice SCALIA, concurring in the judgment.
I agree with the judgment because Fed.Rule App.Proc. 3(c) provides that "[a]n appeal shall not be dismissed for informality of form or title of the notice of appeal." I do not rely on the theory that petitioner's brief was the "functional equivalent" of a notice of appeal under a "liberal construction" of Rule 3. Ante, at 248. "[W]e should seek to interpret the rules neither liberally nor stingily, but only, as best we can, according to their apparent intent." Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co., 487 U.S. 312, 319, 108 S.Ct. 2405, 2410, 101 L.Ed.2d 285 (1988) (SCALIA, J., concurring in the judgment).

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Richard Nixon Presidential Daily Diary/1969/June

* June 1, 1969
* June 2, 1969
* June 3, 1969
* June 4, 1969
* June 5, 1969
* June 6, 1969
* June 7, 1969
* June 8, 1969
* June 9, 1969
* June 10, 1969
* June 11, 1969
* June 12, 1969
* June 13, 1969
* June 14, 1969
* June 15, 1969
* June 16, 1969
* June 17, 1969
* June 18, 1969
* June 19, 1969
* June 20, 1969
* June 21, 1969
* June 22, 1969
* June 23, 1969
* June 24, 1969
* June 25, 1969
* June 26, 1969
* June 27, 1969
* June 28, 1969
* June 29, 1969
* June 30, 1969
# Richard Nixon Presidential Daily Diary/1969/March

* March 1, 1969
* March 2, 1969
* March 3, 1969
* March 4, 1969
* March 5, 1969
* March 6, 1969
* March 7, 1969
* March 8, 1969
* March 9, 1969
* March 10, 1969
* March 11, 1969
* March 12, 1969
* March 13, 1969
* March 14, 1969
* March 15, 1969
* March 16, 1969
* March 17, 1969
* March 18, 1969
* March 19, 1969
* March 20, 1969
* March 21, 1969
* March 22, 1969
* March 23, 1969
* March 24, 1969
* March 25, 1969
* March 26, 1969
* March 27, 1969
* March 28, 1969
* March 29, 1969
* March 30, 1969
* March 31, 1969
# Richard Nixon Presidential Daily Diary/1969/July

* July 1, 1969
* July 2, 1969
* July 3, 1969
* July 4, 1969
* July 5, 1969
* July 6, 1969
* July 7, 1969
* July 8, 1969
* July 9, 1969
* July 10, 1969
* July 11, 1969
* July 12, 1969
* July 13, 1969
* July 14, 1969
* July 15, 1969
* July 16, 1969
* July 17, 1969
* July 18, 1969
* July 19, 1969
* July 20, 1969
* July 21, 1969
* July 22, 1969
* July 23, 1969
* July 24, 1969
* July 25, 1969
* July 26, 1969
* July 27, 1969
* July 28, 1969
* July 29, 1969
* July 30, 1969
* July 31, 1969
# Sefer Ha-yashar, or, the Book of Jasher (1840)/Chapter 69

$^1$ And the king of Edom died in those days, in the eighteenth year of his reign, and was buried in his temple which he had built for himself as his royal residence in the land of Edom.
$^2$ And the children of Esau sent to Pethor, which is upon the river, and they fetched from there a young man of beautiful eyes and comely aspect, whose name was Saul, and they made him king over them in the place of Samlah.
$^3$ And Saul reigned over all the children of Esau in the land of Edom for forty years.
$^4$ And when Pharaoh king of Egypt saw that the counsel which Balaam had advised respecting the children of Israel did not succeed, but that still they were fruitful, multiplied and increased throughout the land of Egypt,
$^5$ Then Pharaoh commanded in those days that a proclamation should be issued throughout Egypt to the children of Israel, saying, No man shall diminish any thing of his daily labor.
$^6$ And the man who shall be found deficient in his labor which he performs daily, whether in mortar or in bricks, then his youngest son shall be put in their place.
$^7$ And the labor of Egypt strengthened upon the children of Israel in those days, and behold if one brick was deficient in any man's daily labor, the Egyptians took his youngest boy by force from his mother, and put him into the building in the place of the brick which his father had left wanting.
$^8$ And the men of Egypt did so to all the children of Israel day by day, all the days for a long period.
$^9$ But the tribe of Levi did not at that time work with the Israelites their brethren, from the beginning, for the children of Levi knew the cunning of the Egyptians which they exercised at first toward the Israelites.
# Selections from the Writings of Lord Dunsany/The Sphinx at Gizeh

THE SPHINX AT GIZEH
I saw the other day the Sphinx's painted face.
She had painted her face in order to ogle Time.
And he has spared no other painted face in all the world but hers.
Delilah was younger than she, and Delilah is dust.
Time hath loved nothing but this worthless painted face.
I do not care that she is ugly, nor that she has painted her face, so that she only lure his secret from Time.
Time dallies like a fool at her feet when he should be smiting cities.
Time never wearies of her silly smile.
There are temples all about her that he has forgotten to spoil.
I saw an old man go by and Time never touched him.
Time that has carried away the seven gates of Thebes!
She has tried to bind him with ropes of eternal sand, she had hoped to oppress him with the Pyramids.
​He lies there in the sun with his foolish hair all spread about her paws.
If she ever learns his secret we will put out his eyes, so that he shall find no more our beautiful things—there are lovely gates in Florence that I fear he will carry away.
We have tried to bind him with song and with old customs, but they only held him for a little while, and he has always smitten us and mocked us.
When he is blind he shall dance to us and make sport.
Great clumsy Time shall stumble and dance, who liked to kill little children and can hurt even the daisies no longer.
Then shall our children laugh at him who slew Babylon's winged bulls and smote great numbers of the elves and fairies, when he is shorn of his hours and his years.
We will shut him up in the Pyramid of Cheops, in the great chamber where the sarcophagus is. Thence we will lead him out when we give our feasts. He shall ripen our corn for us and do menial work.
We will kiss thy painted face, O Sphinx, if thou wilt betray to us Time.
And yet I fear that in his ultimate anguish he may take hold blindly of the world and the moon and slowly pull down upon him the House of Man.
# Selections from the Writings of Lord Dunsany/A Miracle

A MIRACLE
There is a road in Rome that runs through an ancient temple that once the gods had loved; it runs along the top of a great wall, and the floor of the temple lies far down beneath it, of marble, pink and white.
Upon the temple floor I counted to the number of thirteen hungry cats.
'Sometimes,' they said among themselves, 'it was the gods that lived here, sometimes it was men, and now it's cats. So let us enjoy the sun on the hot marble before another people comes.'
For it was at that hour of a warm afternoon when my fancy is able to hear the silent voices.
And the fearful leanness of all those thirteen cats moved me to go into a neighbouring fish shop, and there to buy a quantity of fishes. Then I returned and threw them all over the railing at the top of the great wall, and they fell for thirty feet, and hit the sacred marble with a smack.
Now, in any other town but Rome, or in the minds of any other cats, the sight of fishes falling out of heaven had surely excited wonder. They rose slowly, and all stretched themselves; then they came leisurely towards the fishes. 'It is only a miracle,' they said in their hearts.