OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Keller v. Potomac Electric Power Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
261 U.S. 428
Keller v. Potomac Electric Power Company
Argued: Feb. 26, 27, 1923. --- Decided: April 9, 1923
Messrs. Frank H. Stephens, of Chicago, Ill., and Conrad H. Syme, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 429-431 intentionally omitted]
Mr. John A. Garver, of New York City, for appellee.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 431-436 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kelley v. Arizona

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
399 U.S. 525
Stanley Edward KELLEY v. ARIZONA.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona.
For opinion after remand 480 P.2d 658.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kelley v. Arizona/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
399 U.S. 525
Stanley Edward KELLEY v. ARIZONA.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Arizona for further consideration in light of Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 90 S.Ct. 1975, 26 L.Ed.2d 419.
Mr. Justice HARLAN would vacate the judgment and remand the case to the Supreme Court of Arizona for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 55, 90 S.Ct. 1983.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Johnson v. United States (333 U.S. 10)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
333 U.S. 10
Johnson v. United States (333 U.S. 10)
Argued: Dec. 18, 1947. ---
Mr. James Skelly Wright, for petitioner.
Mr. Robert Erdahl, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Johnson v. United States (333 U.S. 46)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Frankfurter
United States Supreme Court
333 U.S. 46
Johnson v. United States (333 U.S. 46)
Argued: Dec. 10, 1947. --- Decided: Feb 9, 1948
Motion to Recall Mandate Denied April 5, 1948.
See 333 U.S. 865, 68 S.Ct. 788.
Messrs. Silas B. Axtell, of New York City, and David A. Fall, of San Pedro, Cal., for petitioner.
Mr. Samuel D. Slade, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Johnson v. United States (228 U.S. 457)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
228 U.S. 457
Johnson v. United States (228 U.S. 457)
Argued: April 11, 1913. --- Decided: April 28, 1913
Messrs. Edward J. Fox, Robert A. Stotz, and James W. Fox for plaintiff in error.
Assistant Attorney General Harr for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Johnson v. United States (318 U.S. 189)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
318 U.S. 189
Johnson v. United States (318 U.S. 189)
Argued: Jan. 15, 1943. --- Decided: Feb 15, 1943
See 318 U.S. 801, 63 S.Ct. 826, 87 L.Ed. --.
Mr. William A. Gray, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.
Mr. Charles Fahy, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kohlsaat v. Murphy

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
96 U.S. 153
Kohlsaat v. Murphy
ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. Freeman J. Fithian for the plaintiffs in error.
The Solicitor-General, contra.
MR. JUSTICE CLIFFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kohn v. Central Distributing Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
306 U.S. 531
KOHN et al., ADMINISTRATORS, v. CENTRAL DISTRIBUTING CO., Inc., et al.
No. 177. Argued: March 1, 2, 1939. --- Decided: April 17, 1939.
Mr. Harvey H. Smith, of Hindman, Ky., for appellants.
Mr. J. J. Leary, of Frankfort, Ky., for appellees.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kohn v. McNulta

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
147 U.S. 238
Kohn v. McNulta
Statement by Mr. Justice BREWER:
On April 29, 1887, appellant entered into the employ of the defendant, the receiver of the Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Company, as a switchman in the yards of the company at Toledo, Ohio. He coutinued in such employ until the 11th of July, 1887, on which day, in attempting to couple two freight cars, his arm was caught between the deadwoods and crushed. Thereafter he filed his petition of intervention in the circuit court of the United States for the northern district of Ohio, the court which had appointed McNulta receiver, and in which the foreclosure proceedings were still pending. At first his intervening petition was referred to a master, but afterwards, on his motion, the order of reference was set aside, and a jury called and impaneled. The testimony having all been received, the court left to the jury the single question of the amount of damages which the intervener should recover, if entitled to recover anything, and the jury in response thereto found that his damages were $10,000. The court, however, on an examination of the testimony, held that no cause of action was made out against the receiver, set aside the verdict of the jury, and dismissed the petition; from which decision the intervener brought his appeal to this court.
J. K. Hamilton, for appellant.
Wells H. Blodgett, for appellee.
Mr. Justice BREWER, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kim (headings)

* information about this edition.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Unto whose use the pregnant suns are poised, With idiot moons and stars retracting stars? Creep thou between -- thy coming's all unnoised. Heaven hath her high, as Earth her baser, wars. Heir to these tumults, this affright, that fray (By Adam's, fathers', own, sin bound alway); Peer up, draw out thy horoscope and say Which planet mends thy threadbare fate, or mars.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1936, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 87 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kimball Laundry Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinion

    Rutledge

## Dissenting Opinion

    Douglas
United States Supreme Court
338 U.S. 1
Kimball Laundry Company v. United States
Argued: Dec. 7, 8, 1948. --- Decided: June 27, 1949
[Syllabus from pages 1-3 intentionally omitted]
Mr. William J. Hotz, Omaha, Neb., for petitioner.
Mr. George T. Washington, Asst. Sol. Gen., Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Incognita (Congreve)
## Contents

* Preface to Katharine Leveson
* Preface to the reader
* Incognita; or, Love and Duty Reconcil'd
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Incognita

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Incognita."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Incognita, a short story by William Congreve
* Incognita, a poem by Clark Ashton Smith
# Lancashire Legends, Traditions, Pageants, Sports, &c./Part 1/Towneley Hall Tradition

Part I: Legends and Traditions; Towneley Hall Tradition.
TOWNELEY HALL.
The license for enclosing the old park of Towneley, which lay west from the house, is dated 6th Henry VII. ​1490-91. The malice and the superstition of the common people have doomed the spirit of some former and hitherto forgotten possessor of this estate to wander in restless and long unappeased solicitude, crying—
"Lay out, lay out Horelaw and Hollinhey Clough."
"Lay out" means the reverse of "take in,"—i.e., to throw open, or disappropriate land previously enclosed. To show at once the foundation and the antiquity of this story, as well as to illustrate a remark that traditions, when stripped of the marvellous, have generally their basis in truth, Dr Whitaker quotes the following record:— "By letters patent dated February 28, i James I. (1604), the said King grants unto Charles, Lord Mountjoy, Earl of Devon, in consideration of the good services done by him in the time of Queen Elizabeth and since, inter alia, all that parcel of land called Horelaw Pasture, containing by estimation 194 acres, of 24 feet to every perch, abutting on the north upon a pasture called Hollinhey, parcel of the possession of the Duchy of Lancashire, and formerly enclosed in severalty by John Towneley, knight." This was evidently an encroachment, which had been seized by the officers of the Duchy, and granted out afresh. But the offence was remembered long after it had been redressed, and even when the name of the offending party was forgotten. Enclosures were always unpopular among the common people, who uniformly inflicted upon enclosers that punishment after death which they were unable to do in their lifetime. It is also said that this spirit requires one life every seven years, and that some fatal accident happens at the end of each period.
# Lancashire Legends, Traditions, Pageants, Sports, &c./Part 1/Tradition of the Worsley Giant

Part I: Legends and Traditions; Tradition of the Worsley Giant.
THE GIANT OF WORSLEY.
Worsley Hall and manor are said to date their foundation from about the time of the Conquest. At that time the owner was an eminent hero, whose deeds are recorded in ancient romance. Eliseus de Workesley or Worsley was one of the first Norman barons who raised his vassals and joined in the first crusade. His personal acquaintance with Robert, Duke of Normandy, is said to have induced him to accompany his friend and patron in attempting to rescue the Holy Land from the hands of the Saracens. It was for this too that Robert relinquished his claims to the English crown, and mortgaged the revenues of his Norman duchy. Eliseus de Worsley met with numerous enemies in the forms of giants, Saracens, and dragons, all of which he conquered and slew. On arriving at Rhodes, he emulated "More of More Hall," by encountering a venomous serpent which was devastating the district. In this combat, however, he was unsuccessful; for the serpent is said to have stung him so severely that he died and was buried on the spot. In Hopkinson's MS. "Pedigrees of the North Riding of Yorkshire" (fol. 483), is a notice of him which states that "he was of such strength and valour that he was a reputed giant, and in old scrips [writings,] is often called 'Elias Gigas.' He fought many duels, combats, &c., for the love of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, and obtained many victories." These undoubtedly gave rise to the legend; the serpent being probably selected to typify the crafty dealings by which some rapacious landowner sought to enrich himself at the expense of others.
# Lancashire Legends, Traditions, Pageants, Sports, &c./Part 1/Ormskirk Church

Part I: Legends and Traditions; Ormskirk Church.
ORMSKIRK CHURCH.
This church is a large massive structure, on a slightly rising ground, north-west of the town, and has a tower commanding a fine view of the Irish Sea, Liverpool, Preston, &c., and also a spire at the south-east corner, which is ​partly modern, but resting on an ancient octagonal base. The church was probably built soon after the Conquest by Orm, the proprietor of Hatton. A local tradition, of no well-ascertained authority, represents it as having been erected at the cost of two maiden ladies [? sisters] named Orm, who, being unable to decide whether it should have a tower or a spire, accommodated their differences by giving it both. A more probable tradition states that the spire was attached to the original edifice, and that, on the suppression of Burscough Priory, the tower was built for the reception of eight of the bells taken thence, the remainder of the priory bells being removed to Croston Church. The tenor bell at Ormskirk, which is said to have been the third at Burscough, has a Latin inscription in old English letters, "J. S. de Burscough, Esq., and E. my wife, made [this bell] in honour of the Trinity. R.B. 1497."
Roby observes that this tradition is an idle and impertinent invention, as the old ladies might each have had her way by building a tower and surmounting it by a spire. But who can say whether, in self-will, one lady would like to see her tower capped, surmounted, and so to speak, extinguished, by the spire of her sister? He suggests as a more probable solution that at the dissolution of the Priory of Burscough, temp. Henry VIII., the bells of its conventual church were removed to Ormskirk; and, as the small tower beneath the spire was not sufficiently capacious to receive them, the present square steeple was added. This suggestion receives some confirmation in the fact that the tenor bell of Ormskirk church, said to have been previously the third bell at Burscough Priory, bears some apparent proof of its translation. Round the circle below the ear is the following inscription, all, except the founder's initials, in black ​letter —"J. S. * de Burscough, * Armig. * et * E. * vr. me fecerunt in honoris Trinitatis. * R.B. 1497." That is, "J. S. of Burscough, Esq., and E. his wife, made me in honour of the Trinity." Where each asterisk is marked are the rose, portcullis, and fleur-de-lis. The Lancashire rose and the portcullis (borne by the Countess of Richmond and Derby, as a daughter of the Duke of Somerset) were favourite badges of Henry VII., who, besides the fleur-de-lis of France, being usually quartered at that time in the royal arms of England, had some claim to that bearing as the grandson of Sir Owen Tudor and Catherine of France, relict of Henry V. Henry VII. visited the neighbourhood, at Lathom House, the year before this bell was cast; and hence it was probably presented to the Priory in honour of his visit.
# Lancashire Legends, Traditions, Pageants, Sports, &c./Part 1/Rochdale Church, St Chad's

Part I: Legends and Traditions; Rochdale Church, St Chad's.
THE SITE OF ST CHAD'S CHURCH, ROCHDALE.
Towards the close of the reign of William the Conqueror, Gamel, the Saxon thane, Lord of Recedham or Rochdale, being left in the quiet possession of his lands and privileges, was "minded, for the fear of God and the salvation of his immortal soul, to build a chapel unto St Chadde," nigh to the banks of the Rache or Roach. According to Mr Roby, in his "Traditions," a place was set apart on the north bank of the river, in a low and sheltered spot now called "The Newgate." Piles of timber and huge stones were gathered in profusion; the foundations were laid; stakes having been driven, and several courses of rubble stone laid ready to receive the grouting or cement. In one night, the whole mass was conveyed, without the loss of a single stone, to the summit of a steep hill on the opposite bank, and apparently without any visible signs of the mode of removal. The Saxon thane was greatly incensed at what he supposed to be a trick of some of his own vassals, and threatened punishment; to obviate which, a number of the villeins and bordarii with great difficulty and labour conveyed the building materials back to the site for the church; but again were they all removed in the night to the top of the hill. Gamel having learned the truth, sought counsel from Holy Church, and it was thereon resolved ​that the chapel should be built on the hill-top, as the unknown persons would not permit it to be erected on the site originally selected. This explains the chapel or church of St Chadde, still standing on a hill so high that one hundred and twenty-four steps were cut to accomplish the ascent, and enable the good people to go to prayers. Such are the outlines of the tradition as dramatically told by Roby in his popular work under the title of "The Goblin Builders." We find no vestige of the tradition in Haines's "Lancashire" or Dr Whitaker's "Whalley." There is a belief and a saying in Rochdale, which Roby connects with his tradition, but which seems to have no natural relation to it, that "in Rochdale strangers prosper and natives fail."
# Lancashire Legends, Traditions, Pageants, Sports, &c./Part 1/The "Written Stone" in Dilworth

Part I: Legends and Traditions; Dilworth Written Stone.
THE "WRITTEN STONE" IN DILWORTH.
The anonymous author of "The New Clock" mentions, in his "Curious Corners round Preston," that, having heard of a farm called "Written Stone," from an ancient stone bearing an inscription which stands near it, and that the place was reputed to be the haunt of boggarts, he determined to visit it. It is in the township of Dilworth, and parish of Ribchester, about two miles from the village of Longridge, and seven miles N.E. of Preston. Turning down a narrow lane, or old bridle-road, it soon plunged the searcher into a deep ravine, with a rapid mountain rivulet coursing through it, and a tall hedge of holly and hazel making the place a grove. For half a mile he walked and waded through mud and water, and on emerging from this long and tedious lane, turning to his right into a neat farmyard, he espied in a corner the object of his search. He describes it as a huge stone, a foot thick, nine feet long, two feet wide, and ​apparently from the adjacent rocks, placed like a gravestone on the cop. The inscription is on the side facing the road:—Ravffe : Radcliffe : laide : this : stone : to : lye : for : ever : a.d. 1655."
The characters (he adds) are not the raised letters so prevalent in the seventeenth century, but deeply cut in the stone. He found the farmhouse tenanted by a young woman of very respectable appearance, the daughter of the owner of the estate, who, in this romantic spot, leads almost the life of a recluse. She had no dread of supernatural visitants, having never been disturbed by ghost or hobgoblin; and her theory on the subject was pithily summed up in the declaration, "that if folks only did what was right in this world, they would have nothing to fear." The date on the stone speaks of the days of sorcery and witchcraft, and of the troubled times of Cromwell's protectorate. Tradition declares this spot to have been the scene of a cruel and barbarous murder, and it is stated that this stone was put down in order to appease the restless spirit of the deceased, which played its nightly gambols long after the body had been "hearsed in earth." A story is told of one of the former occupants of Written Stone farm, who, thinking that the stone would make a capital "buttery stone," removed it into the house and applied it to that use. The result was, that the indignant or liberated spirit would never suffer his family to rest. Whatever pots, pans, kettles, or articles of crockery were placed on the stone, were tilted ​over, their contents spilled, and the vessels themselves kept up a clattering dance the live-long night, at the beck of the unseen spirit. Thus worried out of his night's rest, the farmer soon found himself compelled to have the stone carefully conveyed back to its original resting-place, where it has remained ever since, and the good man's family have not again been disturbed by inexplicable nocturnal noises. Well may they say with Hamlet, "Rest, perturbed spirit!"
# Landon in The Literary Gazette 1822/Song - Are other eyes beguiling, Love?

Literary Gazette, 5th January, 1822, Page 12
ORIGINAL POETRY.
SONG.
Are other eyes beguiling, Love?
Are other rose-lips smiling, Love?
Ah, heed them not; you will not find
Lips more true, or eyes more kind,
Than mine, Love.
Are other white arms wreathing, Love?
Are other fond sighs breathing, Love?
Ah, heed them not; but call to mind
The arms, the sighs, you leave behind—
All thine, Love.
Then gaze not on other eyes, Love;
Breathe not other sighs, Love;
You may find many a brighter one
Than your own rose, but there are none
So true to thee, Love.
All thine own, mid gladness, Love;
Fonder still, mid sadness, Love;
Tho’ changed from all that now thou art,
In shame, in sorrow, still thy heart
Would be the world to me, Love.—L. E. L.