OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Scales v. United States (355 U.S. 1)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
355 U.S. 1
Scales v. United States
Mr. Telford Taylor, for petitioner.
Solicitor General Rankin (Assistant Attorney General Tompkins, Messrs. Harold D. Koffsky, Kevin T. Maroney, William F. O'Donnell and Philip T. White, on the brief) for the United States.
Mr. Barent Ten Eyck, for American Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae.
On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Scales v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Scales v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Scales v. United States (355 U.S. 1)
* Scales v. United States (360 U.S. 924)
* Scales v. United States (361 U.S. 952)
* Scales v. United States (367 U.S. 203)
# Scaggs v. Larsen

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 1206
Scaggs v. Larsen
Lloyd E. McMurray, on the motion.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, Circuit Justice.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Scaife Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
314 U.S. 459
Scaife Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Argued: Dec. 11, 1941. --- Decided: Dec 22, 1941
Mr. Samuel Kaufman, of Newark, N.J., for petitioner.
Mr. Richard H. Demuth, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Book Introduction - 2 John

Read first chapter of 2 John WRITER: The Apostle John. DATE: Probably A.D. 90. THEME: Second John gives the essentials of the personal walk of the believer in a day when "many deceivers are entered into the world" (2 John 1:7). The key phrase is "the truth," by which John means the body of revealed truth, the Scriptures. The Bible as the only authority for doctrine and life, is the believer's resource in a time of declension and apostasy. The Epistle in three divisions:
* The pathway of truth and love, vs. 1-6
* The peril of unscriptural ways, vs. 7-11
* Superscription, vs. 12,13

# CHAPTER 1
## Verse 5

that we love one another Law (of Christ), Summary: The new "law of Christ" is the divine love, as wrought into the renewed heart by the Holy Spirit Romans 5:5; Hebrews 10:16 and outflowing in the energy of the Spirit, unforced and spontaneous, toward the objects of the divine love ; 2 Corinthians 5:14-20; 1 Thessalonians 2:7,8. It is, therefore, " the law of liberty" ; James 1:25; 2:12 in contrast with the external law of Moses. Moses' law demands love, ; Leviticus 19:18; Deuteronomy 6:5; Luke 10:27 Christ's law is love ; Romans 5:5; 1 John 4:7,19,20 and so takes the place of the external law by fulfilling it ; Romans 13:10; Galatians 5:14. It is the "law written in the heart" under the New Covenant. (See Scofield "Hebrews 8:8").

## Verse 7

world kosmos = mankind. (See Scofield "Matthew 4:8").

## Verse 9

transgresseth Sin. (See Scofield "Romans 3:23").
# Book Introduction - 2 Thessalonians

Read first chapter of 2 Thessalonians WRITER: The Apostle Paul (2 Thessalonians 1:1) DATE: Second Thessalonians was evidently written very soon after Paul's first letter to that church. The occasion may well have been the return of the bearer of the former Epistle and his report. THEME: The theme of Second Thessalonians is, unfortunately, obscured by a mistranslation in the A.V. of 2 Thessalonians 2:2 where "day of Christ is at hand" (See Scofield "1 Corinthians 1:8") should be, "day of the Lord is now present" (See Scofield "Is 2:12"). The Thessalonian converts were "shaken in mind" and "troubled," supposing, perhaps on the authority of a forged letter as from Paul, that the persecutions from which they were suffering were those of the "great and terrible day of the Lord," from which they had been taught to expect deliverance by "the day of Christ, and out gathering together unto him" (2 Thessalonians 2:1) The present letter, then, was written to instruct the Thessalonians concerning the day of Christ, "and our gathering together unto him" 1 Thessalonians 4:14-17 and the relation of the "day of Christ" to the "day of the Lord." First Thessalonians had more in view the "day of Christ"; the present Epistle the "day of the Lord." The Epistle is in five divisions:
* Salutation, 1:1-4
* Comfort, 1:5-12
* Instruction concerning the day of the Lord and the man of sin, 2:1-12
* Exhortations and apostolic commands, 2:13-3:15
* Benediction and authentication, 3:16-18

# CHAPTER 1
## Verse 7

angels (See Scofield "Hebrews 1:4").

# CHAPTER 2
## Verse 2

day of (See Scofield "Isaiah 2:12").

## Verse 3

for that day The order of events is:
* (1) The working of the mystery of lawlessness under divine restraint which had already begun in the apostle's time 2 Thessalonians 2:7
* (2) the apostasy of the professing church 2 Thessalonians 1:3; Luke 18:8; 2 Timothy 3:1-8.
* (3) the removal of that which restrains the mystery of lawlessness 2 Thessalonians 2:6,7. The restrainer is a person--"he," and since a "mystery" always implies a supernatural element (See Scofield "Matthew 13:11") this Person can be none other than the Holy Spirit in the church, to be "taken out of the way" ; 2 Thessalonians 2:7; 1 Thessalonians 4:14-17.
* (4) the manifestation of the lawless one 2 Thessalonians 2:8-10; Daniel 7:8; 9:27; Matthew 24:15; Revelation 13:2-10
* (5) the coming of Christ in glory and the destruction of the lawless one 2 Thessalonians 2:8; Revelation 19:11-21
* (6) the day of Jehovah 2 Thessalonians 2:9-12; Isaiah 2:12

## Verse 7

mystery (See Scofield "Matthew 13:11").

## Verse 10

saved (See Scofield "Romans 1:16").

## Verse 13

salvation (See Scofield "Romans 1:16").

## Verse 16

through grace Grace (in salvation). vs. 1 Timothy 1:14,15; Romans 3:24. (See Scofield "John 1:17").
# Book Introduction - 3 John

Read first chapter of 3 John WRITER: The Apostle John. DATE: Probably about A.D. 90. THEME: The aged Apostle had written to a church which allowed one Diotrephes to exercise an authority common enough in later ages, but wholly new in the primitive churches. Diotrephes had rejected the apostolic letters and authority. It appears also that he had refused the ministry of the visiting brethren (3 John 1:10), and cast out those that had received them. Historically, this letter marks the beginning of that clerical and priestly assumption over the churches in which the primitive church order disappeared. This Epistle reveals, as well, the believer's resource in such a day. No longer writing as an apostle, but as an elder, John addresses this letter, not to the church as such, but to a faithful man in the church for the comfort and encouragement of those who were standing fast in the primitive simplicity. Second John conditions the personal walk of the Christian in a day of apostasy; Third John the personal responsibility in such a day of the believer as a member of the local church. The key-phrase is "the truth" (see 2 John, Introduction). There are three divisions:
* Personal greetings, vs. 1-4
* Instructions concerning ministering brethren, vs. 5-8
* The apostate leader and the good Demetrius, vs. 9-14
# Book Introduction - Amos

Read first chapter of Amos Amos, a Jew, but prophesying (B.C. 776-763) in the northern kingdom (Amos 1:1; 7:14,15) exercised his ministry during the reign of Jeroboam II, an able but idolatrous king who brought his kingdom to the zenith of its power. Nothing could seem more improbable than the fulfilment of Amos' warnings; yet within fifty years the kingdom was utterly destroyed. The vision of Amos is, however, wider than the northern kingdom, including the whole "house of Jacob." Amos is in four parts:
* Judgments on the cities surrounding Palestine, 1:1-2:3.
* Judgements on Judah and Israel, 2:4-16.
* Jehovah's controversy with "the whole family" of Jacob, 3:1-9:10.
* The future glory of the Davidic kingdom, 9:11-15.

# CHAPTER 1
## Verse 2

roar "Roar," etc. Cf. Isaiah 42:13; Jeremiah 25:30-33; Hosea 11:10,11; Joel 3:16. It will be found that wherever the phrase occurs it is connected with the destruction of Gentile dominion (see "Times of the Gentiles," Luke 21:24. (See Scofield "Revelation 16:19") and the blessing of Israel in the kingdom. Without a doubt a near fulfilment upon Syria occurred 2 Kings 14:28 but the expression, "the Lord will roar," looks forward to a vaster fulfilment. See Scofield "Joel 1:4".

# CHAPTER 2
## Verse 4

For three The judgments on Judah and Israel were fulfilled as to Judah in the 70 years' captivity; as to Israel (the northern kingdom) in the world-wide dispersion which still continues.

# CHAPTER 3
## Verse 1

whole family The language here, and the expression "house of Jacob," Amos 3:13 evidently gives the prophecy a wider application than to "Israel," the ten-tribe northern kingdom, though the judgment was, in the event, executed first upon the northern kingdom. 2 Kings 17:18-23.

## Verse 2

therefore It is noteworthy that Jehovah's controversy with the Gentile cities which hated Israel is brief: "I will send a fire." But Israel had been brought into the place of privilege and so of responsibility, and the Lord's indictment is detailed and unsparing. Cf. Matthew 11:23; Luke 12:47,48.

# CHAPTER 4
## Verse 4

Beth-el Cf. 1 Kings 12:25-33. Any altar at Beth-el, after the establishment of Jehovah's worship at Jerusalem was of necessity divisive and schismatic. Deuteronomy 12:4-14. Cf. ; John 4:21-24; Matthew 18:20; Hebrews 13:10-14.

## Verse 5

thanksgiving (See Scofield "Leviticus 7:13").

# CHAPTER 5
## Verse 15

remnant (See Scofield "Jeremiah 15:21").

# CHAPTER 6
## Verse 1

trust (See Scofield "Psalms 2:12").

# CHAPTER 7
## Verse 3

repented (See Scofield "Zechariah 8:14").

## Verse 8

plumbline Symbol of judgment according to righteousness.

## Verse 9

raise As prophesied and fulfilled, 2 Kings 15:10.

# CHAPTER 9
## Verse 1

standing The position of the Lord (Adonai) is significant. The altar speaks properly of mercy because of judgement executed upon an interposed sacrifice, but when altar and sacrifice are despised the altar becomes a place of judgment. Cf. John 12:31.

## Verse 2

hell Heb. "Sheol," (See Scofield "Habakkuk 2:5").

## Verse 9

sift (See Scofield "Psalms 72:1").
# Proletarian Dictatorship and Terrorism

German publication: Proletarische Diktatur und Terrorismus, Hamburg, 1920
Proletarian Dictatorship and Terrorism
by Karl Radek
THE MARXIAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY 5941 JOS. CAMPAU AVE., DETROIT, MICH.
page
Proletarian Dictatorship and Terrorism
by Karl Radek
Translated by P. Lavin
The Marxian Educational Society 5941 Jos. Campau Ave., Detroit, Mich.
page
COPYRIGHT APPLIED FOR MARXIAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY
All rights reserved.
page
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
This work is a translation and has a separate copyright status to the applicable copyright protections of the original content.
# Rosen v. United States (161 U.S. 29)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
161 U.S. 29
Rosen v. United States
Mr. Justice WHITE, with whom concurs Mr. Justice SHIRAS, dissenting.
William N. Cohen, for plaintiff in error.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Whitney, for the United States.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rosen v. United States (245 U.S. 467)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
245 U.S. 467
Rosen v. United States (245 U.S. 467)
Argued: Dec. 12, 1917. --- Decided: Jan 7, 1918
No. 438:Mr. Terence J. McManus, of New York City, for petitioner Pakas.
No. 365:Mr. Assistant Attorney General Fitts, for the United States.
Mr. Meier Steinbrink, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for petitioners.
The Attorney General, for the United States.
Mr. Justice CLARKE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rosemary and Pansies/Written after Reading a Memoir of Clough

WRITTEN AFTER READING A MEMOIR OF CLOUGH
# Rosenbaum v. Bauer

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
120 U.S. 450
Rosenbaum v. Bauer
A. L. Rhodes, for plaintiff in error.
P. G. Galpin, for defendants in error.
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Rosen v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Rosen v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Rosen v. United States (161 U.S. 29)
* Rosen v. United States (245 U.S. 467)
# Rosenberg Bros. Company v. Curtis Brown Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
260 U.S. 516
Rosenberg Bros. Company v. Curtis Brown Company
Argued: Nov. 16, 1922. --- Decided: Jan 2, 1923
Messrs. G. H. Harris, of Rochester, N. Y., and Manton M. Wyvell, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error.
Mr. J. H. Corn, of New York City, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Roskam Statement on Clinton Press Conference

* related authors: Hillary Rodham Clinton.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons gallery, quotes, news.
Roskam Statement on Clinton Press Conference. March 10, 2015. Congressman Peter James Roskam. United States House of Representatives. see also archived by Internet Archive.
Roskam Statement on Clinton Press Conference
United States House of Representatives
March 10, 2015
Roskam Statement on Clinton Press Conference
Mar 10, 2015 Press Release
WASHINGTON, DC—Today, Congressman Peter Roskam (IL-06), a member of the Select Committee on Benghazi, released the following statement after a press conference held by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton:
“Secretary Clinton’s remarks failed to assuage my concerns over her exclusive use of a personal email account during her time as Secretary of State. We have no reason to believe that every relevant email has been turned over to State Department and our Committee. In fact, there are significant gaps in her email activity covering consequential time periods related to Benghazi that remain unaccounted for. At this point, we need an independent arbiter to analyze Secretary Clinton's personal server to ensure that the Committee receives all documents germane to our investigation. The Secretary needs to once and for all be forthcoming with these important records, which belong not to her but the American people."
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Roskam - Benghazi Committee Will Follow The Facts

* related authors: Hillary Rodham Clinton.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons gallery, quotes, news.
Roskam - Benghazi Committee Will Follow The Facts. Peter James Roskam. March 5, 2015. house.gov.
Roskam - Benghazi Committee Will Follow The Facts
United States House of Representatives
March 5, 2015
Roskam: Benghazi Committee Will Follow The Facts
Mar 5, 2015 Press Release
WASHINGTON, DC—Today, Congressman Peter Roskam (IL-06), a member of the Select Committee on Benghazi, released the following statement regarding the Committee's decision to subpoena all communications of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
"For months the Select Committee has pressed the State Department for access to all communications from key officials on watch during the Benghazi terrorist attacks. Yet until last week the Administration failed to mention that countless e-mails from Secretary Clinton have been missing from this search because she exclusively used private accounts during her tenure. This disturbing revelation raises serious questions regarding whether Secretary Clinton complied with federal record keeping requirements and the Obama administration’s record policies. The last time we saw a high government official seeking to edit their own responses was President Nixon, and at least then he enjoyed the benefit of executive privilege. We have said from the beginning that our investigation would follow the facts wherever they lead us—and we intend to keep that promise by reviewing all of the relevant facts and documents in order to issue the definitive report on what happened before, during, and after the terrorist attacks in Benghazi.”
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ross v. Aguirre

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
191 U.S. 60
Ross v. Aguirre
Argued: and submitted October 14, 1903. --- Decided: November 2, 1903
Appeal from an order denying a writ of habeas corpus. The respondent is the warden of the state prison of the state of California, at San Quentin, and holds the petitioner in custody under a judgment of the superior court of San Luis Obispo county, state of California, in which court he had been indicted, tried, and found guilty of the crime of murder, and sentenced to be hanged.
The petition under review is the second presented to the circuit court. The first was denied on the ground 'that application for relief on behalf of said Burt Ross should first be made to the courts of the state.' Thereupon a petition was presented to the supreme court of the state of California, and denied. A writ of error to this court was also denied. The ground of the petition is that the grand jury by which the indictment was found was not selected in accordance with law, and that, therefore, his conviction, sentence, and commitment do not constitute due process of law, and that he is deprived of his liberty in violation of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.
Messrs. W. C. Van Fleet and W. B. Treadwell for appellant.
Messrs. U.S. Webb, E. B. Power, and C. N. Post for appellee.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Roses of Picardy

"British popular song with lyrics by Frederick Weatherly and music by Haydn Wood. Published in London in 1916 by Chappell & Co, it was one of the most famous songs of the First World War and has been recorded frequently up to the present day." Warning: template has been deprecated.
* "Roses of Picardy" in The Canadian Soldiers' Song Book (1917).
* "Roses of Picardy", unidentified version.
# Roses laughed in her pretty hair

Roses laughed in her pretty hair, Shading her eyes from the sun’s rude stare A little hand was prettily raised, Nor ever though it might be praised. Five little fingers, soft and white, A dimple, a sheer kiss of delight. But, miss, a hand that I held in mine, Some nights ago was e’en more fine. A hand that I must grant more praise, Three aces and a pair of treys.
This work is from the United States and in the public domain because it was not legally published with the permission of the copyright holder before January 1, 2003 and the author died more than 70 years ago. This is a posthumous work and its copyright in certain countries and areas may depend on years since posthumous publication, rather than years since the author's death. Translations or editions published later may be copyrighted.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Roses of Picardy (no source)

She is watching by the poplars Colinette with the sea blue eyes She is watching and longing and waiting Where the long white roadway lies And a song stirs in the silence As the wind in the boughs above She listens and starts and trembles 'Tis the first little song of love
Roses are shining in Picardy In the hush of the silver dew Roses are flowering in Picardy But there's never a rose like you And the roses will die with the summer time And our roads may be far apart But there's one rose that dies not in Picardy 'Tis the rose that I keep in my heart
And the years fly on forever Til the shadows veil their sighs But he loves to hold her little hand And look in her sea blue eyes. And he sees the rose by the poplars Where they met in the bygone years For the first little song of the roses Is the last little song she hears
She is watching by the poplars Colinette with the sea blue eyes She is watching and longing and waiting Where the long white roadway lies And a song stirs in the silence As the wind in the boughs above She listens and starts and trembles 'Tis the first little song of love.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
The longest-living author of this work died in 1929, so this work is in the public domain in countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 94 years or less. This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ross v. Bernhard

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Stewart
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 531
Ross v. Bernhard
Argued: Nov. 10, 1969. --- Decided: Feb 2, 1970
William E. Haudek, New York City, for pertitioners.
Marvin Schwartz, New York City, for respondents.
Mr. Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse