OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Proclamation 6941

Delivered on 14 October 1996.
By the President of the United States of America A Proclamation
In the summer of 1996, the remarkable display of athletic excellence at the Tenth Paralympic Games in Atlanta, Georgia, inspired viewers around the world. Athletes from across our country, including many who are blind or visually impaired, participated in these games. The tenacity and commitment to excellence that these athletes showed in Atlanta are rich resources for our Nation. From their performance in the Paralympics, and indeed from their many contributions throughout our Nation's history, blind and visually impaired Americans have demonstrated how much they have to contribute.
Individuals with disabilities, like all people, use many tools in their everyday lives, some simple and some technologically sophisticated. The tool most commonly used by blind and visually impaired people is the white cane. This basic instrument enables them to detect obstacles, steps, drop-offs, and changes in surface textures. The independence that blind and visually impaired people gain through the use of the white cane enriches their lives-and those of all Americans-by allowing them to participate fully in and contribute generously to our society.
Blind and visually impaired individuals make valuable contributions to our society and our economy. But they need more than the white cane to achieve their full potential; they also need equal opportunity and protection from discrimination. That is why we must continue to vigorously enforce the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibits discrimination against blind and visually impaired people and those with other disabilities, and ensures them access to services that all other Americans take for granted.
To honor the numerous achievements of blind and visually impaired individuals, and to recognize the significance of the white cane as a symbol of their freedom and independence in our society, the Congress of the United States, by joint resolution approved October 6, 1964, has designated October 15 of each year as "White Cane Safety Day," and authorized the President to issue a proclamation in observance of this commemoration.
Now, Therefore, I, William J. Clinton, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim October 15, 1996, as White Cane Safety Day. I call upon the people of the United States, government officials, educators, and business leaders to observe this day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this fourteenth day of October, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-first.
William J. Clinton
[Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 8:45 a.m., October 16, 1996]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Quebec Bank of Toronto v. Hellman

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
110 U.S. 178
Quebec Bank of Toronto v. Hellman
An act passed by the legislature of the State of Ohio, respecting the administration of assignments by insolvent debtors, provides as follows: 'Creditors shall present their claims * * * to the assignee for allowance, and the assignee shall indorse his allowance or rejection thereon, and claimants whose claims are rejected shall be required to bring suit against the assignee to enforce such claims, * * * in which, if he recover, the judgment shall be against the assignee that he allow the same in the settlement of his trusts: provided, however, that the assignee may make any defense to such action that the assignor might have made to a suit instituted against him before the assignment for the same cause of action.' 1 Swan & C. St. p. 710, § 74. The bill in this case was filed in pursuance of this statute. It was brought by the appellant, the Quebec Bank of Toronto, against Max Hellman, assignee of P. Weyand and D. Jung, partners as Weyand & Jung. The bill alleges an assignment by Weyand & Jung under the insolvent laws of the state, and the qualification of the assignee, and that Weyand & Jung, at the time of the assignment, were indebted to the Quebec Bank of Toronto upon a promissory note of which the following is a copy:
'CINCINNATI, February 7, 1870.
'Sixty days after date we promise to pay to the order of Geo. M. Bacon & Co. five thousand dollars at Merchants' National Bank. Value received.
'$5,000.
P. WEYAND and D. JUNG.' The note was indorsed as follows:
'GEO. M. BACON & CO.
'JOHN HUGHES.'
The bill further alleged that the note was indorsed and delivered to the plaintiff, before maturity, for value; that the plaintiff was the owner thereof; that a claim based on the note had been presented to the assignee for allowance against the estate of Weyand & Jung, and disallowed. The prayer of the bill was that the assignee be required to allow the claim of the plaintiff for the amount due on said note, to-wit, $5,000, with interest, in the settlement of his trust as assignee of Weyand & Jung. Two defenses were set up in the answer-First, that the appellant was not the owner of the note; and, second, that the note was without consideration and void. Upon final hearing the circuit court made a decree dismissing the bill. That decree is brought up for review by this appeal.
J. B. Stallo, E. W. Kittredge, and Joseph Wilby, for appellant.
John F. Follett and A. A. Kramer, for appellee.
WOODS, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Quebec Company v. Merchant

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
133 U.S. 375
Quebec Company v. Merchant
Wm. Allen Buter and W. Mynderse, for plaintiff in error.
A. J. Dittenhoefer, for defendant in error.
BLATCHFORD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Queen's Court Manuscript

* related portals: Czech literature.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
Queen's Court Manuscript, also called Manuscript of Dvůr Králové, is an alleged medieval manuscript of Old Czech poetry, which was proved to be a 19th-century literary hoax. Suspected authors of the included poems are Václav Hanka and Josef Linda. See also Zelená Hora Manuscript.
English-language translations of Rukopis královédvorský include:
* Manuscript of the Queen's Court (1843), translated by John Bowring, part of the multilingual publication Rukopis kralodvorský.
* The Queen's Court Manuscript with Other Ancient Bohemian Poems (1852), translated by Albert Henry Wratislaw.

## Individual translated poems of the manuscript

* Oldrich and Boleslaw
* Beneš Hermanow
* Jaroslaw
* Czestmir and Vlaslaw
* Ludisa and Lubor
* Zaboi and Slavoi
* Zbyhon
* The Nosegay
* The Strawberries
* The Stag
* The Rose
* The Cuckoo
* The Forsaken
* The Lark
# Quebec (James)

* "Quebec" in The Nation (28 September–5 October 1871)
    — First publication in any form.
* "Quebec" in Portraits of Places (London: Macmillan & Co., 1883): 350–363.
    — First English book edition.
* "Quebec" in Portraits of Places (Boston: James R. Hopgood & Co., 1884): 350–363.
    — First American book edition.
# Queen Elizabeth

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Queen Elizabeth."
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Queen Elizabeth (1876), by Jacob Abbott
* Queen Elizabeth (1892), a work by Edward Spencer Beesly
* Queen Elizabeth (1912)
Author pages
* Elizabeth I, Queen of England
* Elizabeth II, Queen of England
# Real Actions Act 1267 (c.26)

* related portals: England.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Statutes made at Marlborough, alias Marleberge, 18 Novemb. Anno 52 HEN. III. and Anno Dom. 1267.
Real Actions Act 1267 (c.26)
1267 (52 Hen. 3) C A P. XXVI.
IN the Year of Grace, One thousand two hundred sixty seven, the two and fiftieth Year of the Reign of King HENRY, Son of King JOHN, in the Utas of St. Martin, the said King our Lord providing for the better Estate of his Realm of England, and for the more speedy Ministration of Justice, as belongeth to the Office of a King, the more discreet Men of the Realm being called together, as well of the higher as of the lower Estate: It was provided, agreed, and ordained, that whereas the Realm of England of late had been disquieted with manifold Troubles and Dissensions; for Reformation whereof Statutes and Laws be right necessary, whereby the Peace and Tranquillity of the People must be observed:Wherein the King, intending to devise convenient Remedy, hath made these Acts, Ordinances, and Statutes underwritten, which he willeth to be observed for ever firmly and inviolably of all his Subjects, as well high as low.
What Day shall be given to him that is vouched to Warranty.
IT is provided, That none, being vouched to Warranty before our Justices in Eyre, in Plea of Land or Tenement, shall be amerced from henceforth because he was not present when he was vouched to Warranty, except the first Day of the coming of the Justices: But if the Party vouched be within the Shire, then the Sheriff shall be commanded to cause him to come within the third or fourth Day, according to the Distance of the Place, as it was wont to be done in the Circuit of the Justices. And if he dwell without the Shire, then he shall have reasonable Summons of fifteen Days at the least, after the Discretion of the Justices, and the Common Law.
Note : this act is listed in the Chronological Table of Statutes as the Real Actions Act, 1267
This work is in the public domain worldwide because it was created by a public body of the United Kingdom with Crown Status and commercially published before 1974.
See Crown copyright artistic works, Crown copyright non-artistic works and List of Public Bodies with Crown Status.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Reagan v. United States (182 U.S. 419)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
182 U.S. 419
Reagan v. United States
Argued: April 15, 1901. --- Decided: May 27, 1901
Appellant filed his petition in the court of claims October 13, 1897, and an amended petition October 27, 1899, seeking to recover salary as United States commissioner in the Indian territory, at the rate of $1,500 per annum, from February 1, 1896, to September 30, 1899, aggregating $5,375.
The findings of fact and conclusion of law were as follows:
1. The claimant was, on the 25th day of April, 1893, appointed by the United States court for the Indian territory United States commissioner within said territory, under the provisions of § 39 of an act of Congress approved May 2, 1890, chapter 182 (1st Supp. Rev. Stat. 737), and upon the 1st day of March, 1895, the claimant was one of the present commissioners, then holding office under an existing appointment. On April 17, 1895, the following order was entered of record in the United States court in the Indian territory, southern district:
'It appearing from the records of this court that the said William R. Reagan was a duly appointed, qualified, and acting commissioner for the United States court for the third judicial division of the Indian territory, located at Chickasha, on the 1st day of March, 1895, it is hereby ordered that in accordance with the act of Congress approved March 1, 1895, the said William R. Reagan be, and he is hereby, continued in office, and the bond hereinbefore recited be, and the same is, in all things approved and confirmed.
C. B. Kilgore, Judge.'

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Real Actions Act 1267 (c.29)

* related portals: England.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Statutes made at Marlborough, alias Marleberge, 18 Novemb. Anno 52 HEN. III. and Anno Dom. 1267.
Real Actions Act 1267 (c.29)
1267 (52 Hen. 3) C A P. XXVI.
IN the Year of Grace, One thousand two hundred sixty seven, the two and fiftieth Year of the Reign of King HENRY, Son of King JOHN, in the Utas of St. Martin, the said King our Lord providing for the better Estate of his Realm of England, and for the more speedy Ministration of Justice, as belongeth to the Office of a King, the more discreet Men of the Realm being called together, as well of the higher as of the lower Estate: It was provided, agreed, and ordained, that whereas the Realm of England of late had been disquieted with manifold Troubles and Dissensions; for Reformation whereof Statutes and Laws be right necessary, whereby the Peace and Tranquillity of the People must be observed:Wherein the King, intending to devise convenient Remedy, hath made these Acts, Ordinances, and Statutes underwritten, which he willeth to be observed for ever firmly and inviolably of all his Subjects, as well high as low.
In what Case a Writ of Entrie sur disseisin in the Post doth lie.
IT is provided also, That if those Alienations (whereupon a Writ of Entry was wont to be granted) hap to be made in so many Degrees, that by reason thereof the same Writ cannot be made in the Form beforetimes used, the Plaintiffs shall have a Writ to recover their Seisin, without making mention of the Degrees, into whose Hands soever the same shall happen to come by such Alienations, and that by an original Writ to be provided therefore by the Council of our Lord the King.
Fitz. Cui in vita, 23.
Fitz. Entre, 9, 11, 49, 56.
Fitz. Brief, 438, 469, 693, 812.
Co. Lit. 238. b. 239. a.
2 Inst. 253. Regist. 228.
F. N. B. 191. D. K. 192, 201, 203.
Rast. 283.
Note : this act is listed in the Chronological Table of Statutes as the Real Actions Act, 1267
This work is in the public domain worldwide because it was created by a public body of the United Kingdom with Crown Status and commercially published before 1974.
See Crown copyright artistic works, Crown copyright non-artistic works and List of Public Bodies with Crown Status.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Real De Dolores Del Oro v. United States/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
175 U.S. 71
Real De Dolores Del Oro v. United States
Argued: and Submitted January 12, 1899. --- Decided: October 30, 1899
As it appears in this case that these lands were within the limits of the Ortiz Mine grant-which had been confirmed by Congress, and a patent therefor issued to the principal defendant-it follows, without adverting to other defenses, that under the opinion in United States v. Conway, just decided (20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 13, 44 L. ed. --), the claim was properly rejected.
Nor can the petition be sustained for an indemnity under section 14 of the private land claim act, as no such claim is made by the petition. We are also of opinion that section 14 (printed in full in margin ), which provides for a personal judgment against the United States in cases where the land decreed to any claimant, under the provisions of the act, shall have been sold or granted by the United States, applies only to cases where such lands have been sold or granted as public lands, for a consideration which equitably belongs to the owner of the land, and not to cases where the government has merely released its interest to one apparently holding a good title under a Spanish or Mexican grant, which subsequently turns out to be invalid by reason of an older or better title. In the one case there is a moral obligation on the part of the government to protect the real owner. In the other, there is a mere quitclaim of its rights to one who apparently has a better title thereto. There is no warranty, direct or indirect, that the title is a valid one, and no reason why the government should be called upon to protect it. This was the ruling of the court of private land claims in a prior case, and we think it is correct.
The decree of the court below is therefore affirmed.
Mr. Justice Shiras and Mr. Justice White dissented.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Proclamation 7335

Delivered on 27 August 2000.
By the President of the United States of America A Proclamation
1. Pursuant to sections 501 and 502 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (the "1974 Act") (19 U.S.C. 2461 and 2462), the President is authorized to designate countries as beneficiary developing countries for purposes of the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP).
2. Pursuant to sections 501 and 502 of the 1974 Act, and having due regard for the eligibility criteria set forth therein, I have determined that it is appropriate to designate Nigeria as a beneficiary developing country for purposes of the GSP.
3. Section 604 of the 1974 Act (19 U.S.C. 2483) authorizes the President to embody in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS) the substance of the relevant provisions of that Act, and of other acts affecting import treatment, and actions thereunder, including the removal, modification, continuance, or imposition of any rate of duty or other import restriction.
Now, Therefore, I, William J. Clinton, President of the United States of America, acting under the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including but not limited to title V and section 604 of the 1974 Act, do proclaim that:
(1) In order to reflect in the HTS the addition of Nigeria as a beneficiary country under the GSP, general note 4(a) to the HTS is modified by adding "Nigeria" to the list of independent countries, effective with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the date of signature of this proclamation.
(2) Any provisions of previous proclamations and Executive Orders that are inconsistent with the actions taken in this proclamation are superseded to the extent of such inconsistency.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-seventh day of August, in the year of our Lord two thousand, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fifth.
William J. Clinton
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Proclamation 7326

Delivered on 29 June 2000.
By the President of the United States of America A Proclamation
1. Albania has made progress, since its emergence from communism, toward democratic rule and the creation of a market economy. Further, I have found Albania to be in full compliance with the freedom of emigration requirements under title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 (the "Trade Act") (19 U.S.C. 2431, et seq.). In 1998, Albania concluded a bilateral investment treaty with the United States. Albania is in the process of acceding to the World Trade Organization (WTO). The extension of unconditional normal trade relations treatment to the products of Albania will permit the United States to avail itself of all rights under the WTO with respect to Albania when that country becomes a member of the WTO.
2. Pursuant to section 301(b) of Public Law 106-200, 114 Stat. 289, and having due regard for the findings of the Congress in section 301(a) of that law, I hereby determine that title IV of the Trade Act should no longer apply to Albania.
3. Since 1991, Kyrgyzstan has made great progress toward democratic rule and toward creating a free-market economic system. Further, I have found Kyrgyzstan to be in full compliance with the freedom of emigration requirements under title IV of the Trade Act. In 1994, Kyrgyzstan concluded a bilateral investment treaty with the United States, and in 1999 Kyrgyzstan became a member of the WTO. The extension of unconditional normal trade relations treatment to the products of Kyrgyzstan will permit the United States to avail itself of all rights under the WTO with respect to Kyrgyzstan.
4. Pursuant to section 302(b) of Public Law 106-200, 114 Stat. 289- 90, and having due regard for the findings of the Congress in section 302(a) of that law, I hereby determine that title IV of the Trade Act should no longer apply to Kyrgyzstan.
Now, Therefore, I William J. Clinton, President of the United States of America, acting under the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including but not limited to sections 301(b)(1)(B) and 302(b)(1)(B) of Public Law 106-200, do hereby proclaim that:
(1) Nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade relations treatment) shall be extended to the products of Albania;
(2) The extension of nondiscriminatory treatment to the products of Albania shall be effective as of the date of signature of this proclamation;
(3) Nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade relations treatment) shall be extended to the products of Kyrgyzstan;
(4) The extension of nondiscriminatory treatment to the products of Kyrgyzstan shall be effective as of the date of signature of this proclamation.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-ninth day of June, in the year of our Lord two thousand, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-fourth.
William J. Clinton
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Quran (Progressive Muslims Organization)/109
## 1-6

| | In the name of God, the Almighty, the Most Merciful. | Bismi Allahi alrrahmani alrraheemi |
| 109:001 | Say: "O rejecters," | Qul ya ayyuha alkafiroona |
| 109:002 | "I do not serve what you serve," | La aAAbudu ma taAAbudoona |
| 109:003 | "Nor do you serve what I serve," | Wala antum AAabidoona ma aAAbudu |
| 109:004 | "Nor will I serve what you serve," | Wala ana AAabidun ma AAabadtum |
| 109:005 | "Nor will you serve what I serve," | Wala antum AAabidoona ma aAAbudu |
| 109:006 | "To you is your system, and to me is mine." | Lakum deenukum waliya deeni |
# Quran (Progressive Muslims Organization)/111
## 1-5

| | In the name of God, the Almighty, the Most Merciful. | Bismi Allahi alrrahmani alrraheemi |
| 111:001 | Condemned is the hand of Abu-Lahab; condemned indeed. | Tabbat yada abee lahabin watabba |
| 111:002 | His money will not avail him, nor what he has earned. | Ma aghna AAanhu maluhu wama kasaba |
| 111:003 | He will be sent to a flaming Fire. | Sayasla naran thata lahabin |
| 111:004 | And his wife who carries the logs. | Waimraatuhu hammalata alhatabi |
| 111:005 | On her neck will be a rope of thorns. | Fee jeediha hablun min masadin |
# Quran (Progressive Muslims Organization)/112
## 1-4

| | In the name of God, the Almighty, the Most Merciful. | Bismi Allahi alrrahmani alrraheemi |
| 112:001 | Say: "He is God, the One," | Qul huwa Allahu ahadun |
| 112:002 | "God, the Absolute," | Allahu alssamadu |
| 112:003 | "He does not beget, nor was He begotten," | Lam yalid walam yooladu |
| 112:004 | "And there is none who are His equal." | Walam yakun lahu kufuwan ahadun |
# Quran (Progressive Muslims Organization)/113
## 1-5

| | In the name of God, the Almighty, the Most Merciful. | Bismi Allahi alrrahmani alrraheemi |
| 113:001 | Say: "I seek refuge with the Lord of the dawn," | Qul aAAoothu birabbi alfalaqi |
| 113:002 | "From the evils among His creation," | Min sharri ma khalaqa |
| 113:003 | "And from the evil of darkness as it falls," | Wamin sharri ghasiqin itha waqaba |
| 113:004 | "And from the evil of those who practice sorcery," | Wamin sharri alnnaffathati fee alAAuqadi |
| 113:005 | "And from the evil of the envious when they envy." | Wamin sharri hasidin itha hasada |