OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Port Chester Daily Item/1942/John Wahl, 45, Tree Expert, Dies Suddenly

* related portals: John Wahl II.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
John Wahl (1895-1942) in the Port Chester Daily Item on December 5, 1942.
John Wahl, 45, Tree Expert, Dies Suddenly. John Wahl, of 21 Oakwood Avenue, well known Rye resident for 20 years and until a few years ago ahead of the firm of Wahl & Ferguson, landscapes gardeners, died Thursday night at the Veterans Hospital Kingsbridge Road Bronx. He was 45 years old. Stricken suddenly Mr. Wahl was taken to the hospital at 6:30 P.M. and died at 11:20. Ill health forced Mr. Wahl to retire as head of the nursery firm a few years ago. Formerly he was tree warden for the Village of Rye, and he was responsible tee the planting of the community's tree nursery in Milton. Mr. Wahl saw active service abroad in the Meuse-Argonne sector and later with the Army of Occupation as a member of the First Division A.E.F. He is survived by his widow Blanche, three children, Cadet John Wahl, United States Military Academy; Marjorie and William, students at Rye High School.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works could have had their copyright renewed between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st of the 29th year.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Port Gardner Investment Company v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
272 U.S. 564
Port Gardner Investment Company v. United States
Argued: Nov. 23, 1926. ---
Messrs. Duane R. Dills, of New York City, and Loren Grinstead, of Seattle, Wash., for Port Gardner Inv. Co.
The Attorney General and Mr. Wm. D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Port Chester Daily Item/1956/Mrs. Ira Lowe

* related portals: Anna Lillian Lindauer.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, quotes, Wikidata item.
Anna Lillian Lindauer (1872-1956) in the Port Chester Daily Item on June 16, 1956. Her official birth date is 20 October 1872, the date comes from her Manhattan birth record.
Mrs. Ira Lowe. 60-Year Resident of Rye. Mrs. Anna Lowe seventy-five of 21 Oakwood Avenue, Rye died suddenly this morning in the United Hospital. A resident of Rye for over years she was a member of the Rye Methodist Church. Her husband was the late Ira Lowe. Mrs. Lowe was born in New York City, October 20, 1881 [sic], daughter of the late Charles and Anna Augustus Kershaw Lindauer. She is survived by a daughter, Mrs. Blanche Testerman of the home address; a son Joseph Lowe, of Rye; three grandchildren, U.S. Army Capt. John Wahl of Fort Benning, Georgia; Mrs. W. F. Spaulding of San Antonio, Texas; and William Joseph Wahl of Rye, and seven great-grandchildren.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works could have had their copyright renewed between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st of the 29th year.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pope v. United States (392 U.S. 651)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
392 U.S. 651
Pope v. United States (392 U.S. 651)
The petitioner was convicted by a jury and sentenced to death under the Federal Bank Robbery Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(e). The Solicitor General has filed a memorandum for the United States conceding that this death penalty provision 'suffers from the same constitutional infirmity' as that found in the Federal Kidnapping Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a). United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed.2d 138. Accordingly, the Solicitor General concedes that the petitioner's 'sentence must be vacated and the cause remanded * * * for resentencing.' In light of this concession and upon an independent examination of the record, but without reaching any of the petitioner's other claims, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice WHITE in United States v. Jackson, supra, 390 U.S. 570, 591, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 1222.
Mr. Justice BLACK dissents for the further reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Lopinson v. Pennsylvania, 392 U.S. 647, 648, 88 S.Ct. 2277, 20 L.Ed.2d 1344.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Poppe v. Langford/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
104 U.S. 770
Poppe v. Langford
It is clear we have no jurisdiction in this case. All the court below decided was, that in California the title of the true owner of lands is extinguished by an adverse possession under color of right for the length of time which would be a bar to a recovery in ejectment. This is not a Federal question. All that was said about sect. 1007 of the Civil Code of California was unnecessary and not required in the determination of the cause.
Motion granted.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Popular Astronomy/Volume 30/General Notes

Popular Astronomy, Vol. 30, 1922. p.381-384
GENERAL NOTES.
The 10-Foot Telescope for the Frye Observatory.- A clipping was sent us this month from the Seattle Times, in which it was stated that the great disc of glass, weighing ten tons, for the 10-foot reflector of the Frye Observatory had been successfully cast and annealed and is ready for grinding and polishing. A letter of inquiry to Mr. T. S. H. Shearman, who is directing the work on the mirror, brings the following statement:
"In reply to your letter of the 13th I would say that I shall be pleased to give Popular Astronomy particulars from time to time regarding the progress of the work on the 10-ft telescope.
"You will be pleased to know that the speculum will be ready for use in a few weeks. Circular No. 1 of the Frye Observatory will shortly be issued and mailed to you. This will give a full history of the undertaking."
A Gift to the Royal Astronomical Society.-At the meeting of the Royal Astronomical Society (England) April 12,1922, the president, Professor A. S. Eddington, announced a most generous gift of £2500, 5 per cent War Loan, made to the Society by Sir Charles Parsons, K. C. B., F. R. S., to enable it to carry on its work without hindrance in these times of financial stress.
The Astronomische Nachrichten.-This, one of the oldest of astronomical publications, has recently gone through serious crises on account of the heavy expense of printing. It is reported that the Astronomische Gesellschaft has come to the rescue, and that it seems as though the worst difficulties are now past.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published before January 1, 1929.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Poppies

These are the flowers of sleep That nod in the heavy noon, Ere the brown shades eastward creep To a drowsy and dreamful tune — These are the flowers of sleep.
Love's lilies are passion-pale, But these on the sun-kissed flood Of the corn, that rolls breast deep, Burn redder than drops of blood On a dead king's golden mail.
Heart's dearest, I would that we These blooms of forgetfulness Might bind on our brows, and steep Our love in Lethe ere less Grow its flame with thee or me.
When Time with his evil eye The beautiful Love has slain, There is nought to gain or keep Thereafter, and all is vain. Should we wait to see Love die?
Sweetheart, of the joys men reap We have reaped; 'tis time to rest. Why should we wake but to weep? Sleep and forgetting is best — These are the flowers of sleep.
This work is in the public domain in Australia because it was created in Australia and the term of copyright has expired. According to Australian Copyright Council - Duration of Copyright, the following works are public domain:
* published non-government works whose author died before January 1, 1955,
* anonymous or pseudonymous works and photographs published before January 1, 1955, and
* government works published more than 50 years ago (before January 1, 1974).
This work is also in the public domain in the United States because it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days), and it was first published before 1989 without complying with U.S. copyright formalities (renewal and/or copyright notice) and it was in the public domain in Australia on the URAA date (January 1, 1996). This is the combined effect of Australia having joined the Berne Convention in 1928, and of 17 USC 104A with its critical date of January 1, 1996.
Because the Australian copyright term in 1996 was 50 years, the critical date for copyright in the United States under the URAA is January 1, 1946.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Poppe v. Langford

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
104 U.S. 770
Poppe v. Langford
MOTION to dismiss a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the State of California.
Langford, the substituted plaintiff in an action of ejectment, against Poppe, in the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District of California, for the County of San Joaquin, recovered judgment for a tract of land in that county. The only real question involved in the case, and passed upon by the SupremeCourt of the State to which an appeal was taken, is stated in the opinion of this court.
Mr. C. T. Botts and Mr. James D. Coleman in support of the motion.
Mr. C. R. Greathouse and Mr. A. Chester, contra.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Pope v. Williams

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
193 U.S. 621
Pope v. Williams
Argued: March 8, 9, 1904. --- Decided: April 4, 1904

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Popular Astronomy: A Series of Lectures Delivered at Ipswich

See the scan index for this work.
Contents :
| Chapter | page |
| Title Page | iii |
| Preface | v |
| Introduction | vii |
| Lecture 1 | 1 |
| Lecture 2 | 38 |
| Lecture 3 | 80 |
| Lecture 4 | 117 |
| Lecture 5 | 161 |
| Lecture 6 | 199 |
| Appendix | 277 |
| Index | 298 |
# Post v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
161 U.S. 583
Post v. United States
At June term, 1894, of the district court for the district of Minnesota, held at St. Paul, in the Third division of the district, the grand jury for the district presented, on July 20, 1894, two indictments against George W. Post, under section 5493 of the Revised Statutes, for subornation of perjury on February 3, 1894, at Duluth, in the Fifth division.
To each indictment the defendant pleaded not guilty, with leave to withdraw his plea at October term, 1894, held at St. Paul, to which the cases were continued. At that term he withdrew his plea, and demurred to each indictment for want of jurisdiction in the court to take cognizance of the matters and things therein set forth, because the offenses were alleged to have been committed in the Fifth division of the district, and the indictment was found and presented at a term held at St. Paul, in the district and outside of that division. The demurrer was overruled, the defendant pleaded not guilty to each indictment, the two cases were consolidated by order of the court for trial, the jury returned verdicts or guilty; the defendant moved in arrest of judgment for want of jurisdiction in the court to try him upon the indictments, the motion was overruled, and the defendant was sentenced to be imprisoned three years in the penitentiary and to pay a fine of $2,000, and sued out this writ of error.
By stipulation in writing of counsel, it was agreed that there should be added to the record, as if in obedience to a writ of certiorari for diminution thereof, an order of the district court directing the record to be amended by setting forth the following facts: The grand jury for the district of Minnesota at June term, 1894, was duly impaneled, July 5, 1894, and then entered upon the discharge of its duties for the entire district of Minnesota, and was continuously in session from that day to and including July 20, 1894, and on this last day returned these two indictments, and made its final report, and was discharged by the court. All the persons whose names were indorsed upon the indictments were duly summoned in these cases before the grand jury prior to July 5, 1894, and obedience to such summons were in actual attendance upon the court prior to July 12, 1894.
James K. Redington, for plaintiff in error.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Dickinson, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice GRAY, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Postal Steamship Corporation v. The El Isleo Same

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
308 U.S. 378
Postal Steamship Corporation v. The El Isleo Same
Argued: Dec. 12, 1939. --- Decided: Jan 2, 1940
See 112 F.2d 297.
Messrs. John C. Crawley and Earle Farwell, both of New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. Chauncey I. Clark, of New York City, for respondents.
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Postal Telegraph-Cable Company v. City of Fremont

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
255 U.S. 124
Postal Telegraph-Cable Company v. City of Fremont
Argued: Jan. 18, 1921. --- Decided: Feb 28, 1921
Mr. John N. Sebrell, Jr., of Norfolk, Va., for plaintiff in error.
Mr. R. E. Evans, of Dakota City, Neb., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice McKENNA delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Postal Telegraph-Cable Company v. City of Richmond

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
249 U.S. 252
Postal Telegraph-Cable Company v. City of Richmond
Argued: Jan. 22, 1919. --- Decided: March 17, 1919
Messrs. John N. Sebrell, Jr., of Norfolk, Va., and Bynum E. Hinton, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 253-255 intentionally omitted]
Mr. H. R. Pollard, of Richmond, Va., for appellee.
Mr. Justice CLARKE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Posthumous Works of Mary Wollstonecraft/Volume 4/Letter 94

LETTER XV.
My dear sir, I send you a chapter which I am pleased with, now I see it in one point of view—and, as I have made free with the author, I hope you will not have often to say—what does this mean?
You forgot you were to make out ​my account—I am, of course, over head and ears in debt; but I have not that kind of pride, which makes some dislike to be obliged to those they respect.—On the contrary, when I involuntarily lament that I have not a father or brother, I thankfully recollect that I have received unexpected kindness from you and a few others.—So reason allows, what nature impels me to—for I cannot live without loving my fellow-creatures—nor can I love them, without discovering some virtue.
Mary.
Layout 2
# Postscript of Letter to The Rev. H. F. Cary, 6 February 1818

Little Hampton, Arundel, Sussex
Highate, February 6, 1818
PS. I have this morning been reading a strange publication — viz. Poems with very wild and interesting pictures, as the swathing — etched (I suppose) but it is said — printed and painted by the Author, W. Blake. He is a man of Genius — and I apprehend, a Swedenborgian — certainly, a mystic emphatically. You perhaps smile at my calling another Poet, a Mystic; but verily I am in the very mire of common-place common-sense compared with Mr Blake, apo- or rather ana-calyptic Poet, and Painter!
# Postmaster-General United States v. Trigg

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
36 U.S. 173
Postmaster-General United States v. Trigg
Butler, Attorney-General, moved the court for a rule on the district judge of the United States for the district of Missouri, to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not be issued, commanding him to order an execution to issue on the judgment of the said district court in this case.
TANEY, Ch. J., delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Postum Cereal Company v. California Fig Nut Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
272 U.S. 693
Postum Cereal Company v. California Fig Nut Company
Argued: Nov. 29, 1926. --- Decided: Jan 3, 1927
Messrs. Edward S. Rogers and Frank F. Reed, both of Chicago, Ill., and Wm. J. Hughes, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 693-695 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Posthumous Works of Mary Wollstonecraft/Volume 4/Letter 95

LETTER XVI.
Paris, December 26, 1792.
I should immediately on the receipt of your letter, my dear friend, have thanked you for your punctuality, for it highly gratified me, had I not wished to wait till I could tell you that this day was not stained with blood. Indeed the prudent precautions taken by the National Convention to prevent a tumult, made me suppose that the dogs of faction would not dare to bark, much less to bite, however true to their scent; and I was not mistaken; for the citizens, who were all called out, are returning home with composed counte​nances, shouldering their arms. About nine o'clock this morning, the king passed by my window, moving silently along (excepting now and then a few strokes on the drum, which rendered the stillness more awful) through empty streets, surrounded by the national guards, who, clustering round the carriage, seemed to deserve their name. The inhabitants flocked to their windows, but the casements were all shut, not a voice was heard, nor did I see any thing like an insulting gesture.—For the first time since I entered France, I bowed to the majesty of the people, and respected the propriety of behaviour so perfectly in unison with my own feelings. I can scarcely tell you why, but an association of ideas made the tears flow insensibly from my eyes, when I saw Louis sitting, with more ​dignity than I expected from his character, in a hackney coach, going to meet death, where so many of his race have triumphed. My fancy instantly brought Louis XIV before me, entering the capital with all his pomp, after one of the victories most flattering to his pride, only to see the sunshine of prosperity overshadowed by the sublime gloom of misery. I have been alone ever since; and, though my mind is calm, I cannot dismiss the lively images that have filled my imagination all the day.—Nay, do not smile, but pity me; for, once or twice, lifting my eyes from the paper, I have seen eyes glare through a glass-door opposite my chair and bloody hands shook at me. Not the distant sound of a footstep can I hear.—My apartments are remote from those of the servants, the only persons ​who sleep with me in an immense hotel, one folding door opening after another.—I wish I had even kept the cat with me!—I want to see something alive; death in so many frightful shapes has taken hold of my fancy.—I am going to bed—and, for the first time in my life, I cannot put out the candle.
M. W.
Layout 2
# Postponement

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Postponement."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* "Postponement", a poem by Helena Jane Coleman
* "Postponement", a poem by Thomas Hardy
* "Postponement" a short story by J. C. Snaith in Everybody's Magazine