OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# History of Iowa From the Earliest Times to the Beginning of the Twentieth Century/3/Counties/Floyd

​ FLOYD COUNTY lies in the second tier south of the Minnesota line, and in the fourth west of the Mississippi River. It contains an area of five hundred four square miles and was named for William Floyd, one of the ​signers of the Declaration of Independence from the State of New York. Floyd was at one time included in the old county of Fayette, but was made a separate county in 1851. When first established the north line was three miles north of the present northern boundary which was fixed July 1, 1855.
In 1850 Joseph Kelley ascended the Cedar valley to the old village of the Winnebago Indians, which had stood in a large forest. Here Kelley staked out a claim where Charles City now stands. Jerome Watson the same year took a claim farther down the river. Soon after C. P. Burroughs, Joseph Hewett and H. M. Brown took claims six miles above Kelley’s near the river. In the summer of 1853 Mr. Kelley platted a town on his land and named it St. Charles for his eldest son. In 1854 he built a log house on the town plat and also constructed a dam across the river and erected a saw mill. Soon after he changed the name to Charles City.
The county was organized in August, 1854, by the election of the following officers: John M. Hunt, judge; S. C. Goddard, clerk; David Wiltse, prosecuting attorney; William Montgomery, sheriff; C. M. Burroughs, school fund commissioner, and D. B. Mead, superintendent of schools. Charles City was made the county-seat as soon as the organization was completed and several attempts were made to secure its removal which were not successful.
The first newspaper established was the Charles City Intelligencer, the first number of which was issued on the 31st of July, 1856, by A. B. F. Hildreth and D. D. W. Carver. In July, 1855, the town of Floyd was laid out about six miles north of Charles City by James Griffith and Henry Tatum. Here the first bridge across the Cedar River was built. The town of Rockford was laid out on the banks of the Shellrock River in the western part of the county in June, 1856, by men from Rockford, Illinois.
GRANITE BOWLDER AT NORA SPRINGS, Floyd County. Thirty Feet Wide by Forty Long.
​The first railroad built through the county was the Milwaukee and St. Paul, running from east to west.
# History of Iowa From the Earliest Times to the Beginning of the Twentieth Century/3/Counties/Davis

​ DAVIS COUNTY is in the third tier west of the Mississippi River on the south line of the State and embraces an area of five hundred three square miles, as the southern tier of townships is divided by the State line. It was formerly included in the original county of Demoine and afterwards in Van Buren but was created with its present boundaries in 1844 and named for Garret Davis a Kentucky statesman.
As early as 1837 hunters and trappers built cabins in the southern part of the county long before the Sac and Fox Indians had been removed. In 1837 James H. Jordon established a trading post among these Indians on the banks of the Des Moines River in the northeast corner of the county, Van Caldwell and others located near him in 1839-40. In 1842 a post-office was established in the county on the extreme western limits of the Black Hawk Purchase, at a point called Fox, with S. A. Evans as postmaster.
​The county was organized in 1844 by the election of the following officers: S. W. McAtee, W. D. Evans and Abraham Weaver, commissioners; Calvin Taylor, treasurer; Israel Kister, recorder; F. C. Humble, sheriff, and Franklin Street, clerk. The county-seat was located at Bloomfield and the first term of court was held in September, 1844, with Judge Charles Mason presiding. James H. Cowles had, in 1846, entered the land upon which Bloomfield was located and conveyed it to the commissioners who had there established the county-seat. The town was platted the same summer and a post-office secured. The first merchant in the new town was John Lucas who had taken a claim adjoining it in 1844, upon which he had built a log cabin occupied by his family and used also for his store. Hosea B. Horn built the first frame house in Bloomfield in 1849. In 1854 the first newspaper was started by George Johnson named the Western Gazette.
# History of Iowa From the Earliest Times to the Beginning of the Twentieth Century/3/Counties/Dickinson

​ DICKINSON COUNTY lies along the Minnesota line in the third tier east of the western boundary of the State. It is one of the smallest of counties containing but four hundred five square miles, was originally a part of Fayette but in 1851 was created with its present boundaries and first attached to Polk. The county was named for Daniel S. Dickinson, a distinguished New York statesman and contains several of the most beautiful lakes in the west, among which are East and West Okoboji, Spirit Lake, Silver Lake and Swan Lake. It is estimated that the lakes in the county cover an area of about fifty square miles. A history of the first settlements and their extermination by the Sioux Indians is given in another place.
In the year 1857, after the massacre, other settlers came to the county and made homes about the lakes. Among them were R. A. Smith, Dr. J. S. Prescott, B. F. Parmenter, R. U. Wheelock, O. C. Howe, Henry Barkman, Morris Markham and George E. Spencer. In 1857 a town was laid out on the peninsula, formed by Spirit Lake and East Okoboji, by George E. Spencer, O. C. Howe and B. F. Parmenter and named Spirit Lake; this became the county-seat. The first officers of the county were elected in 1857, as follows: Judge, O. C. Howe; recorder and treasurer, M. A. Blanchard; clerk of District Court, R. A. Smith; sheriff, C. F. Hill; prosecuting attorney, B. F. Parmenter. In August, 1870, Orson Rice established the Spirit Lake Beacon, the first newspaper in the county, at the county-seat. The editor was A. W. Osborne and the
WEST OKOBOJI LAKE, In Dickinson County
​paper was printed the first year at the office of the Northern Vindicator, at Estherville in Emmet County.
The beauty of the lakes and groves of Dickinson County annually attracts thousands of tourists from a distance during the summer. Hotels, cottages, scores of boats of all classes and other accommodations have made Okoboji and Spirit Lake most delightful summer resorts.
# Inglis v. Trustees of the Sailor's Snug Harbour in the City of New York

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinions

    Johnson
    Story
United States Supreme Court
28 U.S. 99
Inglis v. Trustees of the Sailor's Snug Harbour in the City of New York

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ingraham v. Hanson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
297 U.S. 378
Ingraham v. Hanson
Argued: Feb. 14, 1936. --- Decided: March 2, 1936
Messrs. Orson P. Soule, of Salt Lake City, Utah, and Horace L. Lohnes, of Washington, D.C., for appellants.
Messrs. Charles D. Moore, of Salt Lake City, Utah, and O. A. Tangren, of Delta, Utah, for appellee.
Mr. Grover A. Giles, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for State Tax Commission of State of Utah, amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Ingraham v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
155 U.S. 434
Ingraham v. United States
Charles H. Page, for plaintiff in error.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Whitney, for the United States.
Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# International Harvester Co. v. Ruckelshaus

* related portals: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
* Court Documents
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinion Bazelon
* 478 F.2d 615
* INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, CHRYSLER CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, PETITIONERS
* v.
* WILLIAM D. RUCKELSHAUS, ADMINISTRATOR, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT
* No. 72-1517, 72-1525, 72-1529, 72-1537
* United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
* February 10, 1973, Decided
Petition for Review of An order Of the Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency.
Reuben L. Hedlund, of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Illinois, pro hac vice, by special leave of the Court, with whom Lawrence Gunnels was on the brief, for Petitioner in No. 72-1517.
Frederick M. Rowe with whom Edward W. Warren, F. F. Hilder, William L. Weber, Jr., and Hammond E. Chaffetz were on the brief, for Petitioner in No. 72-1525.
John E. Nolan, Jr., with whom Robert E. Jordan, III, William G. Christopher, Michael J. Malley, Richard H. Porter, Scott R. Schoenfeld and Victor C. Tomlinson were on the brief, for Petitioner in No. 72-1529.
Howard P. Willens, with whom Jay F. Lapin, William P. Hoffman, Jr., Gerald Goldman, were on the brief, for Petitioner in No. 72-1537.
James A. Glasgow, Attorney, Department of Justice, with whom Kent Frizzell, Assistant Attorney General, Edmund B. Clark and Raymond N. Zagone, Attorneys, Department of Justice, were on the brief, for Appellee.
Jerome Maskowski was on the brief, for State of Michigan, Amicus Curiae.
Bazelon, Chief Judge, Tamm and Leventhal, Circuit Judges. Bazelon, Chief Judge, (concurring in result).
# International Copyright

In vain we call old notions fudge,  And bend our conscience to our dealing; The Ten Commandments will not budge,  And stealing will continue stealing.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# International Criminal Court Act

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "International Criminal Court Act."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* International Criminal Court Act 2001 (c. 17), an UK Act of Parliament that gives effect to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and to criminalize genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes under domestic law.
* International Criminal Court Act 2002 (Cth.), an Australian Act providing for similar issues but not the domestic crimes (which are codified in Chapter 8 of the Criminal Code (Cth.))
* International Criminal Court Act 2006 (No. 30 of 2006), a Irish Act providing for similar issues.
* International Criminal Court Act, 2010 (Act 11 of 2010), an Ugandan Act providing for similar issues.

## See also

* International Crimes and International Criminal Court Act 2000 (2000 No 26) (New Zealand)
* Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act (S.C. 2000, c. 24) (Canada)
# Hoyle's Games Modernized/Blind Hookey

BLIND HOOKEY.
The players, of whom there may be any number, cut for deal, the lowest having the preference. The pack is then shuffled by the player on the dealer's right hand, and afterwards, if he so please, by the dealer himself, after which it is cut by the right-hand player. The two halves are then re-united, and the pack is passed to the player on the left of the dealer, who cuts from the top a small quantity of cards (not less than four, nor more than his due proportion of the pack). The pack is then passed to the next player, who cuts a similar portion, and so on round the circle, the cards left belonging to the dealer. No one looks at his cards, but makes his stake on pure speculation; hence the name "blind" hookey. The dealer then turns up his cards, and shows the bottom one; the other players do the same. Each player holding a higher card than that of the dealer receives the amount of his stake; all below or equal pay the dealer. This is repeated until a hand occurs in which the dealer is a loser all round, when the deal is at an end, and the next player deals.
A second method is as under: The cards having been shuffled and cut, the dealer cuts them into three portions. Two of these are for the company, the third for himself. The other players place their stakes on whichever two packets they please, the rejected packet being taken by the dealer. The stakes having been made, the cards are turned up, and the players receive or pay as the bottom cards of their packets prove to be higher or lower than that of the dealer.
    13 ↑ As a matter of fact, this arrangement is no guarantee whatever against pre-arranged fraud. For the methods employed by card-sharpers at this game, see Les Filouteries du Jeu (Cavaillé). Tit. "Les Petits Paquets."
# Jaehne v. New York

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
128 U.S. 189
Jaehne v. New York
Roger M. Sherman, for the People.
McKenzie Semple, for appellant.
FULLER, C. J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jaffke v. Dunham/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
352 U.S. 280
Jaffke v. Dunham
Argued: Dec. 12, 1956. --- Decided: Jan 14, 1957
We granted certiorari in this case to review a judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 229 F.2d 232, reversing an order of the District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, sitting in bankruptcy, which required respondent as trustee of a bankrupt's estate to pay $27,400 to petitioner. 351 U.S. 949, 76 S.Ct. 847. The District Court's order was based on a finding that, subsequent to the date of the adjudication of bankruptcy, the bankrupt had obtained money by fraud from the petitioner and had turned over $27,400 of that money to respondent. At the hearing before the District Court, petitioner had sought to introduce into evidence an affidavit in which the bankrupt stated that he had paid $36,000 of the money he had received from petitioner to the respondent. At the conclusion of the hearing, the District Court sustained respondent's motion to strike the affidavit.
On appeal, the Court of Appeals held that petitioner had failed to prove that any specific portion of the money that he had given the bankrupt became a part of the funds in the hands of respondent. Because petitioner had not cross-appealed, the Court of Appeals held that it could not consider the action of the District Court in striking the bankrupt's affidavit from the record.
A successful party in the District Court may sustain its judgment on any ground that finds support in the record. If the District Court was in error in striking an admissible affidavit, a cross-appeal was not a prerequisite for the Court of Appeals to rule on the admissibility of the affidavit, and finding it admissible, to find that it afforded evidence in support of the District Court judgment. United States v. American Railway Express Co., 265 U.S. 425, 435-436, 44 S.Ct. 560, 563-564, 68 L.Ed. 1087; Langnes v. Green, 282 U.S. 531, 538-539, 51 S.Ct. 243, 246, 75 L.Ed. 520. Since the Court of Appeals did not consider the admissibility and weight of the affidavit, we remand to the Court of Appeals for its consideration of those issues.
The claim in this case is that relevant, admissible evidence established a constructive trust. Whether it did so or not is a question of Illinois law. The Court of Appeals, in the view it took of the case before it, did not reach this local question. On remand, that question too must be considered by the Court of Appeals.
Reversed and remanded.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jaffke v. Dunham

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
352 U.S. 280
Jaffke v. Dunham
Argued: Dec. 12, 1956. --- Decided: Jan 14, 1957
Mr. Herbert J. Miller, Jr., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. G. William Horsley, Springfield, Ill., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jaliya Sutta

Footnotes need to be incorporated into the text
JĀLIYA SUTTA. [IS THE SOUL DISTINCT FROM THE BODY?]
[This Sutta having been incorporated, word for word, as Sections 15-19, inclusive, in the last Sutta, the reader is referred to the translation given there.
The Mahāli Sutta must have already included, when the Dīgha was put together, this Jāliya episode. For there would otherwise be no reason for the Mahāli Sutta being put into the Sīlakkhanda Vagga, the Sīlas being contained only in that episode.
Why then should the episode appear also again, in full, as a separate Sutta? Is it merely because of the importance of the question? We have another instance of a similar kind, where the episode of Nigrodha’s question, only referred to at Section 23 of the Kassapa-Sīhanāda Sutta, is set out afterwards, in full, in the Udumbarīka Sīhanāda Sutta (No. 25 in the Dīgha). But there the whole episode is not given twice in full. Such cross-references are fairly frequent in the Piṭakas, and are of importance for the history of the literature. One of the most striking cases is where the Saṃyutta quotes a Sutta, now contained in the Dīgha, by name. (Sakkapañha Sutta, S. III, 13; compare Sum. I, 51; Mil. 350.)]
# Jakob Nimmernüchtern

Published in Otmar's Volcks-Sagen (1800)
English-language translations of Jakob Nimmernüchtern include:
* "Jacob Nimmernuchtern, or Jacob of the Bowl" translated by Thomas Roscoe (1826) (transcription project)
* "Jacob Nimmernuchtern" translated by William John Thoms (1834) (transcription project)
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hoyt v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
51 U.S. 109
Hoyt v. United States

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hoyt v. Sprague Francklyn

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
103 U.S. 613
Hoyt v. Sprague Francklyn
APPEALS from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Rhode Island.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Mr. William Allen Butler and Mr. George F. Comstock for the appellants.
Mr. Charles Thurston and Mr. Benjamin F. Thurston, contra.
MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hoyt v. Russell

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
117 U.S. 401
Hoyt v. Russell
Argued: March 22, 1886. ---
Wm. Chumasero, for plaintiff in error.
FIELD, J.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hozey v. Buchanan

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
41 U.S. 215
Hozey v. Buchanan

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Hoyt v. Minnesota/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Blackmun
United States Supreme Court
399 U.S. 524
Melvin Lee HOYT et al. v. MINNESOTA.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed, Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767, 87 S.Ct. 1414, 18 L.Ed.2d 515.
Mr. Justice BLACKMUN, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice HARLAN join, dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Jesus Christ

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Jesus Christ."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.

## Encyclopedic articles

* "Jesus Christ," in The American Cyclopædia (1879)
* "Jesus Christ," by Frederic William Farrar in Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition (13) (1881)
* "Jesus Christ," by Melancthon Williams Jacobus in The New International Encyclopædia, New York: Dodd, Mead and Co. (1905)
* "Jesus Christ," by Joseph Armitage Robinson in Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed., 1911)
* "Jesus Christ," by Anthony John Maas in Catholic Encyclopedia, (ed.) by Charles G. Herbermann and others, New York: The Encyclopaedia Press (1913)
* “Jesus Christ”, by David Foster Estes in The Encyclopedia Americana, New York, 1920

## Poems

* "Jesus Christ, the Lord's anointed", poem by John Newton
* "Jesus Christ the Apple Tree", 18th century anonymous poem
* "Jesus Christ", 1915 poem by Covington Hall

## Other

* Jesus the Christ, 1922 study by James Edward Talmage
* "Jesus - Christ", a chapter in the 1975 book A Course in Miracles by Helen Schucman

## See also

* Christ
* Author:Jesus of Nazareth