OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book XIX/Hymn 67

67. For long life and prosperity.
[Brahman.—aṣṭāu. sāuryam. prājāpatyā gāyatrī.]
Not found in Pāipp. According to the comm., it is used in the same manner as the two preceding hymns. ⌊Cf. khila to RV. i. 50.⌋
Translated: Griffith, ii. 319.
1. May we see a hundred autumns.
2. May we live a hundred autumns.
3. May we wake a hundred autumns.
​4. May we ascend (ruh) a hundred autumns.
5. May we prosper a hundred autumns.
6. May we be a hundred autumns.
7. May we adorn a hundred autumns.
8. More autumns than a hundred.
The comm.* reckons the hymn as only one verse; the Anukr. and all the mss. ⌊see SPP's ed., p. 543, note 1⌋ count eight verses, and SPP. also adopts this. The first two verses are the last two pādas of RV. vii. 66. 16; they are found also in GGS. iii. 8. 5; a third verse, with çṛṇuyāma, is added in PGS. i. 6. 3; ⌊MS., at iv. 9. 20, has four pādas, with çṛṇuyā́ma pushed to the fourth place by the insertion of prábravāma (ed. prábruv-) in the third;⌋ and the series is carried further in VS. xxxvi. 24, which, beginning as does PGS., has five pādas, ⌊with prábravāma in the fourth, and ádīnāḥ syāma in the fifth, and⌋ with the added ending bhū́yaç ca çarádaḥ çatā́t, which needs emendation. ⌊MGS., at i. 22. 11, agrees with VS.⌋ In TA. iv. 42. 5 and in HGS. i. 7. 10 ⌊the series is carried to eight pādas⌋: these agree from 1 to 7 ⌊with páçyema, jī́vema, nándāma, módāma, bhávāma, çṛṇávāma, prábravāma⌋, and differ only in the eighth, where TA. has ájītāḥ syāma against ajitāḥ syāma of HGS.; and both have the added ending jyók ca sū́ryaṁ dṛçé. In none of the other versions is there anything to help us with the doubtful forms in the Atharvan. In vs. 3, most of the mss. read búddhema (some búdhema); our emendation búdhyema is given also by the comm., and SPP. adopts it. In vs. 5, on the other hand, the mss., the comm., and SPP., give the wholly anomalous pū́ṣema (= puṣṭim labhemahi, comm.); SPP. ought to have emended to púṣyema, as we had done. Bhū́yema (= bhūyāsma, comm.) in vs. 7 is another impossibility retained by SPP. In vs. 8 all the mss. have bhū́yasī ⌊or -āsī⌋; but the comm. has -sīs, and so SPP. has the courage to adopt and read it, as we had done before. *⌊At p. 543$^9$.⌋
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book XIX/Hymn 72

72. For the favor of the gods.
[Bhṛvan̄giras Brahman.—ekarcam. paramātmadāivatam. trāiṣṭubham.]
Follows in Pāipp. directly after hymn 68. It is given in full* in the Kāuç. text (139. 26), at the end of the ceremony of commencement of Vedic study; ⌊and the pratīka is cited at 139. 25;⌋ and the scholiasts add its use at the end of the parvan ceremonies (Keç. to section 6; p. 310, l. 5), and of the piṇḍapitṛyajña (Keç. to 89. 17; p. 371, l. 12), and to the snānavrata (note to 42. 18). *⌊As to the citation in sakalapāṭha, cf. p. 897, ¶3.⌋
Translated: Griffith, ii. 320.
1. Out of what receptacle we bore up the Veda, within that do we set it down; what is performed [and] sacrificed by the heroic might of the bráhman, with that fervor, O gods, favor ye me here.
Some of the mss. accent variously abharāma and vedam; ⌊Griffith renders by 'bunch of grass,' again (as at 68. 1) implying the accent vedám: but this accent is given only by SPP's S$^m$.;⌋ two or three of SPP's have ṛtám instead of kṛtám in c; the version in Kāuç. 139. 26 gives in place of either adhītam. Ppp. reads in a, b udbharāmi veda tasminn antar va dudhmay enam.
⌊Here ends the seventh and last anuvāka, with 18 hymns (or 14 or 13: see introd. to hymn 60, above); and with 55 verses, if we count them as they are numbered in the Berlin text. They are summed up as 55 verses by certain mss.—No mention of the ending of a prapāṭhaka is made in the colophon.⌋
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book XIX/Hymn 69

69. To the waters: for long life.
[Brahman.—catasraḥ. mantroktādevatyāḥ. 1. āsury anuṣṭubh; 2. sāmny anuṣṭubh; 3. āsurī gāyatrī; 4. sāmny uṣṇih (1-4. 1-av.).]
⌊Prose.⌋ Found also in Pāipp. xix. The four verses of this hymn are called in Kāuç. and Vāit. jivās, and are prescribed to accompany the rinsing of the mouth with water in the parvan ceremony (Kāuç. 3. 4; Vāit. 1. 19, misunderstood by the editor), in a rite for long life at the reception of a Vedic student (Kāuç. 58. 7), and in the madhuparka ceremony (Kāuç. 90. 22); of these the comm. takes notice only of Kāuç. 58. 7. With this use is doubtless connected the attribution of the hymn in the Anukr. to the waters as divinity. ⌊As to the citation by technical designation, and especially as to the ritual uses, see p. 897, ¶2.⌋
Translated: Griffith, ii. 320.
1. Living are ye; may I live; may I live my whole life-time.
2. Living on are ye; may I live on; may I live my whole life-time.
3. Living together are ye; may I live together; may I live my whole life-time.
4. Lively are ye; may I live; may I live my whole life-time.
# Atharva-Veda Samhita/Book XIX/Hymn 71

71. For various blessings.
[Brahman.—ekarcam. gāyatrīdāivalam. 3-av. 5-f. atijagatī.]
Wanting in Pāipp. The comm. is unable to quote any authority as to its use; but he declares it to belong to the worship of the Veda that one has studied, or of the gāyatrī.
Translated: Zimmer, p. 204; Griffith, ii. 320.
1. Praised by me [is] the boon-giving Veda-mother. Let them urge on the soma-hymn of the twice-born. Having given to me life-time, breath, progeny, cattle, fame, property, Vedic splendor, go ye to the brahma-world.
A corresponding verse is found in the supplement (p. 915 of the Calc. ed.) ⌊p. 855 of the Poona ed.⌋ to TA. x. 36, reading thus: stuto mayā varadā vedamātā pracodayantī pavane dvijātā: āyuḥ pṛthivyāṁ draviṇam brahmavarcasam mahyaṁ datvā prajātum brahmalokam (the accentuation is only partial, and worthless); its variants hardly help the interpretation of our verse. The translation given above makes no pretense to being an intelligent one; it merely endeavors to make what sense it can, with least divergence from the manuscript readings. For a it implies stutā́ máyā varadā́ vedamātā́, which agrees throughout with the mss., save that they accent vedamātā in several different ways; the pada-mss. give varadā without division. For b is implied prá codayantām pāvamānī́ṁ dvijā́nām (with our edition); the mss. accent pracodáyantām; and ⌊excepting W's P.M.W., which give pāvamānī́m⌋ they read pāvamānī́, which SPP. adopts. In the second division, SPP. reads paçúm, with ⌊about⌋ half the authorities, and with the comm.; the remaining authorities favor our paçū́n, giving that or paçū́ṁ. The comm. explains varadā by iṣṭakāmapradātrī, and vedamātā by vedasya rgādirūpasya mātā, signifying the sāvitrī, and standing as subject to pra codayantām, which is pluralis majestaticus, as is also vrajata. ⌊Weber discusses varadā and the TA. passage at Ind. Stud. ii. 194 (as Whitney notes in the margin), and resolves stuto into stutā u.⌋
# Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Leach/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinion Clarke
United States Supreme Court
249 U.S. 217
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Leach
Argued: January 15 & 16, 1919. --- Decided: March 10, 1919.
Respondent Leach sued the petitioners for damages sustained en route by cattle delivered at East St. Louis, Ill., October 1, 1914, for shipment to Georgetown, Ky. In defense the carriers set up non-compliance with the following provision contained in bill of lading issued as required by act of Congress.
'That no claim for damages which may accrue to the said shipper under this contract shall be allowed or paid by the said carrier, or sued for in any court by the said shipper, unless a claim for loss or damages shall be made in writing verified by the affidavit of the shipper or his agent, and delivered to the general freight agent of said carrier at his office in Cincinnati, Ohio, within five days from the time said stock is removed from said car or cars, and that if any loss or damage occurs upon the line of connecting carrier, then such carrier shall not be liable unless a claim shall be made in like manner and delivered in like time, to some proper officer or agent of the carrier on whose line the loss or injury occurs.'
This averment was not denied; but the shipper replied that he promptly advised the railroad's agent at Georgetown of all essential facts and maintained that requirement in respect of written notice to general freight agent had been waived.
The point involved has been discussed in our recent opinions and we can find nothing which takes this case out of the rule requiring compliance with a provision in a bill of lading like the one above quoted. St. L., I. Mt. & So. Ry. Co. v. Starbird, 243 U.S. 592, 37 Sup. Ct. 462, 61 L. Ed. 917; Southern Pacific Co. v. Stewart, 248 U.S. 446, 39 Sup. Ct. 139, 63 L. Ed. 350, decided January 13, 1919.
The judgment below is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Reversed and remanded.
Mr. Justice PITNEY and Mr. Justice BRANDEIS concur in the result.
Mr. Justice CLARKE dissenting.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Settle

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
260 U.S. 166
Baltimore Company v. Settle
Argued: and Submitted Oct. 20, 1922. --- Decided: Nov 13, 1922
Mr. Geo. Hoadley, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Harry C. Barnes, of Chicago, Ill., for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Leach
## Dissenting Opinion

    Clarke
United States Supreme Court
249 U.S. 217
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Leach
Argued: January 15 & 16, 1919. --- Decided: March 10, 1919.
Messrs. Wm. W. Crawford and Charles H. Gibson, both of Louisville, Ky., for petitioners.
Messrs. Frank W. Hackett and John S. Blair, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. United States (260 U.S. 565)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 592 (1923), is a US Supreme Court case on contract law. The Supreme Court held that an implied in fact contract exists as, “an agreement … founded upon a meeting of minds, which, although not embodied in an express contract, is inferred, as a fact, from conduct of the parties showing, in the light of the surrounding circumstances, their tacit understanding.”
United States Supreme Court
260 U.S. 565
Baltimore Company v. United States
Argued: Nov. 16, 1922. --- Decided: Jan 2, 1923
Messrs. Geo. E. Hamilton and John F. McCarron, both of Washington, D. C., and R. Marsden Smith, of Baltimore, Md., for appellant.
Messrs. Solicitor General Beck, of Washington, D. C., and Alfred A. Wheat, of New York City, for the United States.
Mr. Justice SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. United States

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. United States."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. United States (260 U.S. 565), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
* Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. United States (261 U.S. 385), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
* Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. United States (261 U.S. 592), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
* Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. United States (277 U.S. 291), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
* Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. United States (279 U.S. 781), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
* Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. United States (298 U.S. 349), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
* Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. United States (304 U.S. 58), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
* Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. United States (305 U.S. 507), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
* Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. United States (345 U.S. 146), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
* Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. United States (386 U.S. 372), ( ?? L.Ed. ??? ), ( ?? S.Ct. ??? )
   * listing incomplete
# Book of Mormon (1981)

* related portals: Mormonism.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, quotes, definition, Wikidata item.
The text of this version is from the 1981 edition published by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
* Introduction
* 1 Nephi
* 2 Nephi
* Jacob
* Enos
* Jarom
* Omni
* Words of Mormon
* Mosiah
* Alma
* Helaman
* 3 Nephi
* 4 Nephi
* Mormon
* Ether
* Moroni
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Book of Mormon (1830)/Preface

PREFACE.
To the Reader—
As many false reports have been circulated respecting the following work, and also many unlawful measures taken by evil designing persons to destroy me, and also the work, I would inform you that I translated, by the gift and power of God, and caused to be written, one hundred and sixteen pages, the which I took from the Book of Lehi, which was an account abridged from the plates of Lehi, by the hand of Mormon; which said account, some person or persons have stolen and kept form me, notwithstanding my utmost exertions to recover it again—and being commanded of the Lord that I should not translate the same over again, for Satan had put it into their hearts to tempt the Lord their God, by altering the words, that they did rear contrary from that which I translated and caused to be written; and if I should bring forth the same words again, or, in other words, if I should translate the same over again, they would publish that which they had stolen, and Satan would stir up the hearts of this generation, that they might not receive this work: but behold, the Lord said unto me, I will not suffer that Satan shall accomplish his evil design in this thing: therefore thou shalt translate from the plates of Nephi, until ye come to that which ye have translated, which ye have retained; and ​behold ye shall publish it as the record of Nephi; and thus I will confound those who have altered my words. I will not suffer that they shall destroy my work; yea, I will shew unto them that my wisdom is greater than the cunning of the Devil. Wherefore, to be obedient unto the commandments of God, I have, through his grace and mercy, accomplished that which he hath commanded me respecting this thing. I would also inform you that the plates of which hath been spoken, were found in the township of Manchester, Ontario county, New-York.
The Author.
# Book of Mormon (1830)/Three Witnesses

THE TESTIMONY OF THREE WITNESSES.
Be it known unto all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people, unto whom this work shall come, that we, through the grace of God the Father, and our Lord Jesus Christ, have seen the plates which contain this record, which is a record of the people of Nephi, and also of the Lamanites, his brethren, and also of the people of Jared, which came from the tower of which hath been spoken; and we also know that they have been translated by the gift and power of God, for his voice hath declared it unto us; wherefore we know of a surety, that the work is true. And we also testify that we have seen the engravings which are upon the plates; and they have been shewn unto us by the power of God, and not of man. And we declare with words of soberness, that an Angel of God came down from heaven, and he brought and laid before our eyes, that we beheld and saw the plates, and the engravings thereon; and we know that it is by the grace of God the Father, and our Lord Jesus Christ, that we beheld and bear record that these things are true; and it is marvellous in our eyes: Nevertheless, the voice of the Lord commanded us that we should bear record of it; wherefore, to be obedient unto the commandments of God, we bear testimony of these things.—And we know that if we are faithful in Christ, we shall rid our garments of the blood of all men, and be found spotless before the judgement seat of Christ, and shall dwell with him eternally in the heavens. And the honor be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost, which is one God. Amen.
OLIVER COWDERY,
DAVID WHITMER,
MARTIN HARRIS.
# Bird-Lore

Volumes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

## Volumes

* Volume I (transcription project), No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4, No. 5, No. 6
* Volume II transcription project, No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4, No. 5, No. 6
* Volume III (transcription project), No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4, No. 5, No. 6
* Volume IV (transcription project), No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4, No. 5, No. 6
* Volume V (transcription project), No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4, No. 5, No. 6
* Volume VI (transcription project), No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4, No. 5, No. 6
* Volume VII (transcription project), No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4, No. 5, No. 6
* Volume VIII (transcription project), No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4, No. 5, No. 6
* Volume IX (start transcription), No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 4, No. 5, No. 6

## Audubon Society Educational Leaflets

* Educational Leaflet No. 6 Passenger Pigeon
* Educational Leaflet No. 7 Snowy Heron

## Illustrative Plates

Plates of Bird-Lore
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Bird-Lore/Volume 01/Ixobrychus exilis

* related portals: Birds, Ornithology, National Association of Audubon Societies.
* sister projects: Commons category, taxonomy.
LEAST BITTERN ON NEST
Photographed from life by E. G. Tabor. (See page 39)
BY E. G. TABOR
On the morning of May 27, 1897, equipped with an extra supply of patience and a 5 x 7 ‘Premo B’ camera fitted with rapid rectilinear lens, my plate-holders filled with unexposed plates, and accompanied by my wife, who has been a partner in all of my successful trips, I started for Otter Lake, Cayuga County. N. Y.
It was a beautiful morning, with not a breath of air stirring (by the way, this is the hardest of all things to control, and is an absolute necessity if you are to make fine, clear-cut negatives of birds and their natural surroundings), and the lake looked like a mirror. It took but a minute to get the large, flat-bottomed row-boat ready for the start, and we were soon gliding along, an oar’s-length from shore, scanning every tree, bush, and bunch of rushes, in search of nests, those of the Red-winged Blackbird being very plenty and placed both in bushes or rushes in about equal numbers. A pair of Kingbirds had selected as the place for their summer home, a large, low willow limb which projected over the water; a peep into the nest revealed three eggs, common, yet so beautiful in their bed of wool and feathers.
Our next finds were several nests of a pair of Long-billed Marsh Wrens, which looked more like mouse-nests than anything else I have in mind. As we could return to these later, if unable to find anything better, we had not yet exposed a single plate, reserving them for a rare or unusual find.
We were in search of nests of the Least Bittern, and as we were passing that part of the shore where they always nested, we soon located a nest, but as it only contained one egg, another nest must be found. A male Least Bittern flew up a short distance ahead of us and ‘dropped in’ back of the bushes. We rowed down to the place from which he flushed, and standing up in the boat looked around, and not more than a boat’s-length ahead, we espied a female sitting on a nest. I pushed the boat very carefully to within a couple of feet of the nest, and prepared to make an exposure. The camera was set to focus on an object 34 inches from cap of lens, and I moved it back and forth until the focus was perfect, the diaphragm was closed to ƒ16, and an instantaneous exposure with speed at $^1$⁄$_{25}$ was made.
As most of my operations, preparatory to making the exposure, were of necessity carried on within three feet of the bird on the nest, ​ she at several times started to leave it ; but when the bird moved I kept still, and when she kept still I worked; in this way I finally completed my preparations. The peep I got of the eggs as she partly raised off from them, just as I finished, made me squeeze the bulb before I intended to ; but the result I obtained fully satisfied me, for in no other way could I describe the results of this trip, and what I saw and learned of the habits and home-life of the Least Bittern.
# Bird-Lore/Volume 01/No. 1/A Cover Design

A Cover Design
This interesting sketch was contributed by a prominent ornithologist as an appropriate cover design for this magazine at a time when it was proposed to call it “The Bird World.” The appearance of a book bearing this title renders it necessary for
us to abandon its use, but we do not, for the same reason, feel justified in depriving the world of this remarkably artistic effort, and therefore present it for the edification of our readers, and we trust, to the delight of its author!
# Bird-Lore/Volume 01/No. 1/A Prize Offered

A Prize Offered
WE want the boys and girls who read Bird-Lore to feel that they have a share in making the journal interesting. Young eyes are keen and eager when their owner's attention is aroused: so we ask the attention of every reader of Bird-Lore of fourteen years or under to the following offer: To the one ending us the best account of a February walk we will give a year’s subscription to this journal. The account should contain 250 to 300 words, and should describe the experiences of a walk in the country or some large park, with particular reference to the birds observed.
# Bird-Lore/Plates
## Volume I

* John Burroughs at ‘Slab Sides’
* A Least Bittern Portrait

## Volume VI

* Hooded Warbler and Yellow-breasted Chat
* Pine and Red-faced Warblers
* Wilson’s and Canadian Warblers