OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# The Times/1918/Obituary/Edward John Long Scott

Source: The Times (London, England), Monday, May 20, 1918; pg. 3; Issue 41794 — Death Of An Archaeologist.
DEATH OF AN ARCHÆOLOGIST
Dr. Edward John Long Scott, formerly Keeper of Manuscripts ad Egerton Librarian at the British Museum and Keeper of Muniments at Westminster Abbey, was seized with sudden illness during the morning service in Westminster Abbey yesterday morning, He was conveyed to the Westminster Hospital, where he died in the afternoon.
The second son of the late George H. C. Scott, Rector of Rhôs-Crowther, Pembrokeshire, Dr. Scott was born at Bridgwater in April, 1840, and was therefore in his 79th year. He was educated at Marlborough and Lincoln College, Oxford, where he gained a classical scholarship in 1859, and a Goldmsith's Company exhibition two years later. In 1862 he won the Boden Sanskrit Scholarship, taking his degree in the same year. Wtih all this, he found time also to take part in college rowing and cricket, and was a member of both the eight and the eleven. A year after he took his degree he was appointed assistant in the M.S.S. Department of the British Museum, being promoted to Assistant Keeper in 1870 and Keeper in 1888. He took the degree of D.Litt. at Oxford in 1902. Dr. Scott wrote in 1880 the Introduction to the Reprint of the Eikon Basilike, and published the Eclogues of Virgil in English verse, and edited the Letter-Book of Gabriel Harvey for the Camden Society in 1884. These were followed in later years by other works, including "Records of Harrow," published in 1886.
This work was published in 1918 and is anonymous or pseudonymous due to unknown authorship. It is in the public domain in the United States as well as countries and areas where the copyright terms of anonymous or pseudonymous works are 105 years or less since publication.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# The Times/1918/Letter to the Editor/The Late Mr. J. S. Cotton

* related authors: James Sutherland Cotton.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Source: The Times, Monday, Jul 15, 1918; pg. 9; Issue 41842 — The Late Mr. J. S. Cotton
The Late Mr. J. S. Cotton
An "Old Friend" writes of Mr. J. S. Cotton, who death was announced in "The Times" of Thursday:—
Since Cotton's retirement from the editorship of the "Academy", to which he succeed on the death of his friend Charles Appleton in 1879, he had lived somewhat the life of a recluse who found satisfaction in the continuance of studies which were the ruling passion of his days. Those who were on the reviewing staff of that journal—a dwindling remnant—will bear in memory the impartiality, almost to the point of severity, which he brought to his duties, and how in his hands there failed not upholding of the high conceptions of his office which characterized the rule of his predecessor, whereby the "Academy" remained the medium of inter-communication between scholars of the East and West, its columns unsullied by any intrusion of 'ad captandum vulgus' elements.
Avoiding the public eye, he was happy in the fellowship of those who care for the things of the mind, who profited by his scholarship and his sanity of judgment. To these he unbosomed himself in warmth of friendship and geniality of soul, in an eagerness which received as gladly as it imparted. Although his birth was in India, his tastes and training gave him supreme interest in subjects which have attraction only for the few, subjects in which he was an admitted master, he was free from the defects of specialism, and those who met him were impressed by the proofs of wide knowledge never obtruded, but supplied in enrichment of the matter in hand. His estimate of the value of archaeological research in India, Central Asia, and Egypt did not less from him the significance of the spade work at Knossos and Nippur; in fact, not long before his death he expressed the belief that the discoveries in these last name might prove of greater importance in the history of culture. There remains for those who knew and loved James Sutherland Cotton the regret that his incisive talk had no record, and that his published works, from their necessary limitations of subject, can only imperfectly convey the erudition of a gifted man, memory of who is not 'writ in water'.
This work was published in 1918 and is anonymous or pseudonymous due to unknown authorship. It is in the public domain in the United States as well as countries and areas where the copyright terms of anonymous or pseudonymous works are 105 years or less since publication.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# The Sarah Hazard/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
21 U.S. 391
The Sarah Hazard
By the act constituting the judicial system of the United States, the District Courts are Courts both of common law and admiralty jurisdiction. In the trial of all cases of seizure, on land, the Court sits as a Court of common law. In cases of seizure made on waters navigable by vessels of ten tons burthen and upwards, the Court sits as a Court of Admiralty. In all cases at common law, the trial must be by jury. In cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, it has been settled, in the cases of the Vengeance, (reported in 3 Dallas' Rep. 297.) the Sally, (in 2 Cranch's Rep. 406.) and the Betsy and Charlotte, (in 4 Cranch's Rep. 443.) that the trial is to be by the Court.
Although the two jurisdictions are vested in the same tribunal, they are as distinct from each other as if they were vested in different tribunals, and can no more be blended, than a Court of Chancery with a Court of Common law.
The Court for the Louisiana District, was sitting as a Court of Admiralty; and when it was shown that the seizure was made on land, its jurisdiction ceased. The libel ought to have been dismissed, or amended, by charging that the seizure was made on land.
The direction of a jury, in a case where the libel charged a seizure on water, was irregular; and any proceeding of the Court, as a Court of Admiralty, after the fact that the seizure was made on land appeared, would have been a proceeding without jurisdiction.
The Court felt some disposition to consider this empannelling of a jury, at the instance of the claimants, as amounting to a consent that the libel should stand amended; but, on reflection, that idea was rejected.
If this is considered as a case at common law, it would be necessary to dismiss this appeal, because the judgment could not be brought before this Court but by writ of error. If it be considered as a case of admiralty jurisdiction, the sentence ought to be reversed, because it could not be pronounced by a Court of Admiralty, on a seizure made on land.
As the libel charges a seizure on water, it is thought most advisable to reverse all the proceedings to the libel, and to remand the cause to the District Court, for farther proceedings, with directions to permit the libel to be amended.
DECREE. This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record of the District Court of Louisiana, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is DECREED and ORDERED, that the sentence of the District Court for the District of Louisiana, condemning the said 422 casks of wine as forfeited to the United States, be, and the same hereby is reversed and annulled. And it is further DECREED and ORDERED, that the cause be remanded to the said District Court of Louisiana, with directions to allow the libel in this case to be amended, and to take such farther proceedings in the said cause as law and justice may require. #fnc

## Notes

* ↑ c
# The Truth about Marriage/Chapter21

CHAPTER XXI
IS LOVE ALONE ENOUGH
Now here is another question, and one that is often asked, "Is love alone enough for a happy mating?"
No. That is my answer, and I answer as I do because the word love is capable of so many different interpretations.
Two young people may have what is called calf love. This often occurs when people are very young. It is not a discriminating love, but simply sex sentiment, based upon superficial conditions such as the pink cheeks and bright eyes of the girl and the manly ways of the boy. They are just boy and girl out in the world in quest of love and seeking to enjoy the romance of life, dreaming dreams, and fastening the affections on the first desirable one of the other sex that appears.
Have you ever looked back on your early loves and smiled over them? Of course, there have been boys and girls who have fallen in love as children ​and have never outgrown it, but they are rare. Our judgment in early youth is apt to be without discrimination.
Then there is the case of the woman who loves a man who does not command her complete respect, possibly because of slipshod ways or language or lack of education or good-breeding, or because of weakness of will or lack of intellect. Love alone is certainly not enough in such a case.
Then there is the question of money, Will love alone suffice? It depends upon the man and also upon the woman. If the man is able to make money later on, love plus character will suffice. If the woman is able to bear hardships of poverty until the man comes into his own, love is enough. But often both the man and woman find that when the wolf knocks at the door love flies out at the window.
Yet some of the happiest marriages have been entered into when the man was as poor as a church mouse. The capacity of the man to provide seems to be highly useful, even when love is deep and strong. Otherwise the woman may lose her patience.
# The Truth about Marriage/Chapter23

CHAPTER XXIII
WHERE CAN I FIND MY MATE?
Any kind of social gathering is a good place to meet those of the opposite sex. The social side of church life is a good place to see and be seen. We think that one ought to go to church for the sake of religion, and so one ought, but it is in just such places that one is apt to meet the right kind of a person to marry. And I am sure the Lord will not hold it against any young woman or young man if one thinks of the charms of those of the other sex, even though it be in a place of religion.
In fact, I feel certain that the ruler of universal human life is deeply interested in the right kind of young people meeting each other with a view to a happy marriage.
Many young people go to public dance halls for the sake of meeting interesting people of the opposite sex. The trouble about such places is the danger of meeting people whom one would not want to ​admit to one's home, still less into one's more intimate life.
One has to be on one's guard all the time against people that do not measure up to proper standards of conduct and character. Young people are often easily deceived by appearances.
But in general, young people of both sexes ought to go where they can meet those of the opposite sex, the better the place the better the chance of meeting the right kind of people.
Do not be too exclusive in your attitude and manner, and yet do not hold yourself cheaply, so that you will not be appreciated in the right way. Always have in mind that the girl who shuts herself away from the crowds is not apt to be seen. And one must be seen to be appreciated.
# The Truth about Marriage/Chapter29

CHAPTER XXIX
SHALL WE TELL THEIR FAULTS TO OUR MATES
"To what extent should a married pair inform each other of their faults." I would say that as a rule they actually do inform each other of the faults they find. In fact, they learn to throw verbal brickbats at each other too often. They are not apt to mince matters, and be overcareful in statement.
But it is not useful to throw brickbats at each other, literal brickbats or verbal ones. Politeness is indispensable between married partners if the marriage is to continue a happy one. Marriage ought not to give anyone the privilege of throwing brickbats. It does not.
Wives and husbands should be kinder to each other than to anyone else. Fault-finding may be a greater fault than the faults it is intended to correct.
# The Truth about Marriage/Chapter24

CHAPTER XXIV
PERFECTION IN ONE'S MATE
Now here is another question that young people ought to ask themselves, "How much perfection should you look for in your mate?"
Well, marriage is marriage. It is a day and night affair, one that continues week in and week out, year in and year out, and sometimes as long as one lives, and I believe that our married partner ought to be very nearly perfect in every way to stand the test.
Of course, no one is perfect, and yet the nearer your sweetheart or lover appears to you as perfect the better it is for your happiness. Love glosses over defects. The love in your heart ought to be so strong that your wife ought to appear to you to be just about right, day in and day out, and your husband ought to have so many virtues that you can afford to overlook his faults.
Now one may be too critical and always looking ​out for the defects. That is not the right spirit. One must be just and kindly in one's attitude.
The very best time to demand relative perfection is before you are married, when there is time to change your mind about getting married.
It is indispensable for married happiness that one shall choose wisely, use common sense, good judgment in making one's choice, know what one likes and does not like, and what the married partner must have as a basis for pleasing you.
Then one must not say, as some young folks nowadays say, "Oh, I guess it doesn't much matter if he is not perfect. We can get divorced if we do not find ourselves congenial." It is too big a price to pay, to enter into the intimacies of married life in order to find out if the other party is congenial. Find out beforehand.
You will never find absolute perfection, but you can find qualities that you know will suit and will stand the test.
Don't throw yourself away into the arms of one who is unworthy and who will not appreciate you nor understand you. Get as near perfection as you can, and then, if you really love deeply, you will see perfection where others see imperfection. It takes genuine love to see the good points in another.
# The Truth about Marriage/Chapter25

CHAPTER XXV
THE BEST REASON FOR MARRIAGE
What do you think of this question? "What is the best reason for getting married?"
I think the very best reason is because you love another and are yourself beloved; in other words, because of mutual love.
You may want a home, like other people, you may want children, because you love them, you may want companionship, you may want to be taken care of by someone who regards your happiness as the greatest joy of life. You may have many selfish reasons for being married; but a great unselfish love of another, which is returned by an unselfish soul adapted to you in every way, will bring you happiness.
# The Truth about Marriage/Chapter28

CHAPTER XXVIII
SHALL A SWEETHEART'S CONFESSION PREVENT MARRIAGE
Our question is followed by another: "Should a man let his sweetheart's confession concerning her past indiscretions prevent his marriage to her?"
The answer to that is easy so far as we are concerned: It depends wholly upon the man. It may not be so easy for the man to answer. If he insists that a woman should be better than a man, and he cannot overlook her indiscretions, he will be happier to find a woman with a happier past.
# The Southwest Wave/1939/Winblad Rites

Eva Ariel Lattin (1892-1939) in The Southwest Wave on 30 June 1939. Anton Julius Winblad (1886-1975) is incorrectly referred to as "H. A. Winblad" instead of the correct "A. J. Winblad", and Anthony LeRoy Winblad (1912-1970) is referred to as "Ray" instead of the correct "Roy" in the original text.
Winblad Rites. Funeral services for Mrs. Eva Winblad, 417 West Seventy-seventh street, were held at the Allen Reed mortuary. Interment followed in Inglewood Park cemetery. Mrs. Winblad, 47, was a native of Farmingdale, New York. She leaves her husband, H. A. Winblad [sic]; three sons Norman, Earl, and Ray [sic]; her father, Jarvis Lattin of Florida; a sister, Mrs. Myrtle Williams of Los Angeles; three sisters in New York and one sister in New Jersey..
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was legally published within the United States (or the United Nations Headquarters in New York subject to Section 7 of the United States Headquarters Agreement) before 1964, and copyright was not renewed.
* For Class A renewal records (books only) published between 1923 and 1963, check the Stanford University Copyright Renewal Database.
* For other renewal records of publications between 1922–1950, see the University of Pennsylvania copyright records.
* For all records since 1978, search the U.S. Copyright Office records.
Works could have had their copyright renewed between January 1st of the 27th year after publication or registration and December 31st of the 28th year. As this work's copyright was not renewed, it entered the public domain on January 1st of the 29th year.
This work may be in the public domain in countries and areas with longer native copyright terms that apply the rule of the shorter term to foreign works.
It is imperative that contributors ascertain that there is no evidence of a copyright renewal before using this license. Failure to do so will result in the deletion of the work as a copyright violation.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# The Southerner's Departure

The Southerner’s Departure.
When the bright sunny South was in peace and content, The years of my boyhood were carelessly spent, And the broad spreading plains and the deep flowing streams That were dear to my memory and seen in my dreams. Chorus:—And it’s home, boys, home, and it’s home we ought to be. Chorus:—Home, boys, home in our own country; Chorus:—Where the sugar and the cotton and the old orange tree, Chorus:—They are all growing green in the Southern country.
The days of my boyhood have glided away, While those of my manhood have bloomed into day; And now the Yankees my freedom deny, I for one will repulse them or fight till I die. Chorus:—And it’s home, boys, home, &c.
I left the refinements and comforts of life, Through dangers of bloodshed, privations of life I have counted the cost, I have plighted my word, I have shouldered my musket and belted my sword. Chorus:—And it’s home, boys, home, &c.
My father looked sad, though he bade me depart, And my mother embraced me in anguish of heart; And my beautiful sisters looked pale in their woe, Though they kissed me and blessed me and told me to go. Chorus:—And it’s home, boys, home, &c.
I have left a fair maiden, my heart’s polar star— More beautiful than others, more precious by far; Though she wept when we parted, I asked not to stay, But I gave her my hand, then I hastened away. Chorus:—And it’s home, boys, home, &c.
Oh! father, dear father, for me do not weep, For in some rugged mountain I ever may sleep; Of the dangers of war I am fully aware, And for sickness and death I will try to prepare. Chorus:—And it’s home, boys, home, &c.
Oh! mother, dear mother, for me do not weep, Your kind good advice I forever shall keep; You taught me to be brave from a boy to a man, And I am going to fight for my own native land. Chorus:—And it’s home, boys, home, &c.
Oh! sister, dear sister, for me do not weep, Your tears and sorrow pierce my heart deep; Oh! now I must go, for here I cannot stand, I am going in defence of my own native land. Chorus:—And it’s home, boys, home, &c.
From my sister and my parents I once had to part, Though my dearest loved one was dearest to my heart; Oh! I never can forget when I took her by the hand, When I started in defence of my own native land. Chorus:—And it’s home, boys, home, &c.
The time will soon come—oh! how long will it be?— When from Yankee invaders our country will be free, The war will be over and the fighting will be done, Then how happy the meeting with loved ones at home. Chorus:—And it’s home, boys, home, &c.
This work was published before January 1, 1929 and is anonymous or pseudonymous due to unknown authorship. It is in the public domain in the United States as well as countries and areas where the copyright terms of anonymous or pseudonymous works are 95 years or less since publication.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# The Souvenir of Western Women/A Brave Life and a Useful One

A Brave Life and a Useful One
THE LATE MRS. JOHN MINTO
The announcement of the death of Martha Morrison, wife of Hon. John Minto, will be heard with regret by those who have known, loved and honored her from the early settlement of Oregon down to the present time.
Martha Morrison came to the Pacific Coast with her parents in 1844, by the slow and primitive means of conveyance in those times. She was then a girl of but 13 years, and three years later became the wife of John Minto, from whom, after fifty-seven years of happy and helpful wifehood, she has now been separated by death. An exemplary housewife, a wise and kind mother, a helpful neighbor, a sympathetic friend, she left no duty unfulfilled.
Martha Morrison represented an intelligent, capable womanhood in its truest, because its most helpful and tenderest sense is honored by such life. In circles which for many years she has stood for the typical pioneer woman — fearless, cheerful, capable, willing, resourceful—she will be greatly missed. As for the rest, it may be told in the words of the wise man: "Her children rise up and call her blessed; her husband also, and he praiseth her."
# The Yellow Book/Volume 3/The Ballad of a Nun

A Ballad of a Nun
By John Davidson
# The Yellow Book/Volume 3/Three Pictures

Three Pictures
By Walter Sickert
page
page
# The Yellow Book/Volume 3/To a Bunch of Lilac

To a Bunch of Lilac
By Theo Marzials
# The Yellow Book/Volume 3/Twilight

Twilight
By Olive Custance
# The Yellow Book/Volume 3/Study of a Head

Study of a Head
By an Unknown Artist
# The Yellow Book/Volume 3/To Salomé at St. James's

To Salomé at St. James's
By Theodore Wratislaw
# The Spirit of the Nation/A Voice from America

A VOICE FROM AMERICA.
I.
From the far West, o'er wide Atlantic's wave, With giant accent Freedom's tidings sweep. Columbia's roused. Let Peel and Graham rave. Let Stanley "on," and hoary Wellesley keep His counsel as he lists. We reck not, and we care not, How much he dare to do. We guess how much he dare not.
II.
We know ourselves unconquerably firm— We're temperate, cool, determined to be free— We feel that vassalage must reach its term— We've had our centuries of slavery. And now, oh, God! with thy strong arm around us, Shall power abuse, or despotism wound us?
III.
Is it for nought the humble friar came, Missioned of heav'n, to banish from our shore The curs'd ingredient in our cup of shame— The canker worm that ate into the core— The serpent vice that coiled around the soul, And gave but grief's worst remedy, "the bowl?"
IV.
Is it for nought that He, our Leader rules Our peaceful millions with sagacious sway?— A sway more potent than the minion tools Of Tory rule could beg or buy. The day Of our deliverance dawns—we know it, and we feel it— The Union's fetters fall. Ho! Feel, we say, repeal it!
# The Spirit of the Nation/A Health

A HEALTH.
Hurra! our feuds are drowned at last; Hurra! let tyrants tremble; The fronted foemen of the past In brotherhood assemble. Fill up—and with a lofty tongue As ever spoke from steeple, From shore to shore his health be rung— The leader of the people.
In mighty triumphs, singly won, The nation has a token That mightier deeds will yet be done— The last strong fetter broken; Since hearts of nerve and hands of strength, Once banded to resist him, Unfurl his flag, and share at length The glory to assist him.
Up with the wine from boss to brim, And be his voice the loudest, Who rears, at risk of life or limb, Our country's flag the proudest. "The leader of the people"—grand, Yet simple wisdom guide him! And glory to the men who stand, Like sheathed swords, beside him!