# Chapters on Jewish Literature/Chapter 3

CHAPTER III
The Talmud
I (220–280) Palestine—Jochanan, Simon, Joshua, Simlai; Babylonia—Rab and Samuel.
II (280–320) Palestine—Ami, Assi, Abbahu, Chiya; Babylonia—Huna and Zeira.
III (320–380) Babylonia—Rabba, Abayi, Rava.
IV (380–430) Babylonia—Ashi (first compilation of the Babylonian Talmud).
V and VI (430–500) Babylonia—Rabina (completion of the Babylonian Talmud).
The Talmud, or Gemara (“Doctrine,” or “Completion”), was a natural development of the Mishnah. The Talmud contains, indeed, many elements as old as the Mishnah, some even older. But, considered as a whole, the Talmud is a commentary on the work of the Tannaim. It is written, not in Hebrew, as the Mishnah is, ​but in a popular Aramaic. There are two distinct works to which the title Talmud is applied; the one is the Jerusalem Talmud (completed about the year 370 C. E.), the other the Babylonian (completed a century later). At first, as we have seen, the Rabbinical schools were founded on Jewish soil. But Palestine did not continue to offer a friendly welcome. Under the more tolerant rulers of Babylonia or Persia, Jewish learning found a refuge from the harshness experienced under those of the Holy Land. The Babylonian Jewish schools in Nehardea, Sura, and Pumbeditha rapidly surpassed the Palestinian in reputation, and in the year 350 C. E., owing to natural decay, the Palestinian schools closed.
The Talmud is accordingly not one work, but two, the one the literary product of the Palestinian, the other, of the Babylonian Amoraim. The latter is the larger, the more studied, the better preserved, and to it attention will here be ​mainly confined. The Talmud is not a book, it is a literature. It contains a legal code, a system of ethics. a body of ritual customs, poetical passages, prayers, histories, facts of science and medicine, and fancies of folk-lore.
The Amoraim were what their name implies, “Expounders,” or “Discoursers”; but their expositions were often original contributions to literature. Their work extends over the long interval between 200 and 500 C. E. The Amoraim naturally were men of various character and condition. Some were possessed of much material wealth, others were excessively poor. But few of them were professional men of letters. Like the Tannaim, the Amoraim were often artisans, field-laborers, or physicians, whose heart was certainly in literature, but whose hand was turned to the practical affairs of life. The men who stood highest socially, the Princes of the Captivity in Babylonia and the Patriarchs ​in Palestine, were not always those vested with the highest authority. Some of the Amoraim, again, were merely receptive, the medium through which tradition was handed on; others were creative as well. To put the same fact in Rabbinical metaphor, some were Sinais of learning, others tore up mountains, and ground them together in keen and critical dialectics.
The oldest of the Amoraim, Chanina, the son of Chama, of Sepphoris (180–260), was such a firm mountain of ancient learning. On the other hand, Jochanan, the son of Napacha (199–279), of dazzling physical beauty, had a more original mind. His personal charms conveyed to him perhaps a sense of the artistic; to him the Greek language was a delight, “an ornament of women.” Simon, the son of Lakish (200–275), hardy of muscle and of intellect, started life as a professional athlete. A later Rabbi, Zeira, was equally noted for his feeble, unprepossessing figure ​and his nimble, ingenious mind. Another contemporary of Jochanan, Joshua, the son of Levi, is the hero of many legends. He was so tender to the poor that he declared his conviction that the Messiah would arise among the beggars and cripples of Rome. Simlai, who was born in Palestine, and migrated to Nehardea in Babylonia, was more of a poet than a lawyer. His love was for the ethical and poetic elements of the Talmud, the Hagadah, as this aspect of the Rabbinical literature was called in contradistinction to the Halachah, or legal elements. Simlai entered into frequent discussions with the Christian Fathers on subjects of Biblical exegesis.
The centre of interest now changes to Babylonia. Here, in the year 219, Abba Areka, or Rab (175–247), founded the Sura academy, which continued to flourish for nearly eight centuries. He and his great contemporary Samuel (180–257) enjoy with Jochanan the honor of supplying the ​leading materials of which the Talmud consists. Samuel laid down a rule which, based on an utterance of the prophet Jeremiah, enabled Jews to live and serve in non-Jewish countries. “The law of the land is law,” said Samuel. But he lived in the realms of the stars as well as in the streets of his city. Samuel was an astronomer, and he is reported to have boasted with truth, that “he was as familiar with the paths of the stars as with the streets of Nehardea.” He arranged the Jewish Calendar, his work in this direction being perfected by Hillet II in the fourth century. Like Simlai, Rab and Samuel had heathen and Christian friends. Origen and Jerome read the Scriptures under the guidance of Jews. The heathen philosopher Porphyry wrote a commentary on the Book of Daniel. So, too, Abbahu, who lived in Palestine a little later on, frequented the society of cultivated Romans, and had his family taught Greek. Abbahu ​was a manufacturer of veils for women’s wear, for, like many Amoraim, he scorned to make learning a means of living. Abbahu’s modesty with regard to his own merits shows that a Rabbi was not necessarily arrogant in pride of knowledge! Once Abbahu’s lecture was besieged by a great crowd, but the audience of his colleague Chiya was scanty. “Thy teaching,” said Abbahu to Chiva, “is a rare jewel, of which only an expert can judge; mine is tinsel, which attracts every ignorant eye.”
It was Rab, however, who was the real popularizer of Jewish learning. He arranged courses of lectures for the people as well as for scholars. Rab’s successor as head of the Sura school, Huna (212–297), completed Rab’s work in making Babylonia the chief centre of Jewish learning. Huna tilled his own fields for a living, and might often be met going home with his spade over his shoulder. It was men like ​this who built up the Jewish tradition. Huna’s predecessor, however, had wider experience of life, for Rab had been a student in Palestine, and was in touch with the Jews of many parts. From Rab’s time onwards, learning became the property of the whole people, and the Talmud, besides being the literature of the Jewish universities, nay be called the book of the masses. It contains, not only the legal and ethical results of the investigations of the learned, but also the wisdom and superstition of the masses. The Talmud is not exactly a national literature, but it was a unique bond between the scattered Jews, an unparallelled spiritual and literary instrument for maintaining the identity of Judaism amid the many tribulations to which the Jews were subjected.
The Talmud owed much to many minds. Externally it was influenced by the nations with which the Jews came into contact. From the inside, the influences at ​work were equally various. Jochanan, Rab, and Samuel in the third century prepared the material out of which the Talmud was finally built. The actual building was done by scholars in the fourth century. Rabba, the son of Nachmani (270–330), Abavi (280–338), and Rava (299–352) gave the finishing touches to the method of the Talmud. Rabba was a man of the people; he was a clear thinker, and loved to attract all comers by an apt anecdote. Raya had a superior sense of his own dignity, and rather neglected the needs of the ordinary man of his day. Abayi was more of the type of the average Rabbi, acute, genial, self-denying. Under the impulse of men of the most various gifts of mind and heart, the Talmud was gradually constructed, but two names are prominently associated with its actual compilation. These were Ashi (352–427) and Rabina (died 499). Ashi combined massive learning with keen logical ingenuity. ​He needed both for the task to which he devoted half a century of his life. He possessed a vast memory, in which the accumulated tradition of six centuries was stored, and he was gifted with the mental orderliness which empowered him to deal with this bewildering mass of materials.
It is hardly possible that after the compilation of the Talmud it remained an oral book, though it must be remembered that memory played a much greater part in earlier centuries than it does now. At all events, Ashi, and after him Rabina, performed the great work of systematizing the Rabbinical literature at a turning-point in the world’s history. The Mishnah had been begun at a moment when the Roman empire was at its greatest vigor and glory; the Talmud was completed at the time when the Roman empire was in its decay. That the Jews were saved from similar disintegration, was due very largely to the Talmud. The Talnud is thus one of the ​great books of the world. Despite its faults, its excessive casuistry, its lack of style and form, its stupendous mass of detailed laws and restrictions, it is nevertheless a great book in and for itself. It is impossible to consider it further here in its religions aspects. But something must be said in the next chapter of that side of the Rabbinical literature known as the Midrash.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
The Talmud.
    Essays by E. Deutsch and A, Darmesteter Jewish Publication Society of America).
    Graetz.—II, 18–22 (character of the Talmud, end of ch. 22).
    Karpeles.—Jewish Literature and other Essays, p. 52.
    Steinschneider.—Jewish Literature, p. 20.
    Schiller-Szinessy.—Encycl. Brit., Vol. XXIII, p. 35.
    M. Mielziner.—Introduction to the Talmud (Cincinnati, 1894).
    S. Schechter.—Some Aspects of Rabbinic Theology, J. Q. R., VI, p. 405. etc.
    ——— Studies in Judaism (Jewish Publication Society of America, 1896), pp. 155, 182, 213, 233 [189, 222, 259, 283].
    B. Spiers.—School System of the Talmud (London, 1898) (with appendix on Baba Kama); the Three-​fold Cord (1893) on Sanhedrin, Baba Metsia, and Baba Bathra.
    M. Jastrow.—History and Future of the Text of the Talmud (Publications of the Gratz College, Philadelphia, 1897, Vol. I).
    P. B. Benny.—Criminal Code of the Jews according to the Talmud (London, 1880).
    S. Mendelsohn.—The Criminal Jurisprudence of the Ancient Hebrews (Baltimore. 1891).
    D. Castelli—Future Life in Rabbinical Literature, J. Q. R., I, p. 314.
    M. Güdemann.—Spirit and Letter in Judaism and Christianity, ibid.. IV. p. 345.
    I. Harris.—Rise and Development of the Massorah, ibid., I, pp. 128, etc.
    H. Polano.—The Talmud (Philadelphia, 1876).
    I. Myers.—Gems from the Talmud (London, 1894).
    D.W. Amram.—The Jewish Law of Divorce according to Bible and Talmud (Philadelphia, 1896).