OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Kay v. Ehrler

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
499 U.S. 432
Kay v. Ehrler
No. 90-79 Argued: Feb. 25, 1991. --- Decided: April 16, 1991
Timothy B. Dyk, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Ann M. Sheadel, Frankfort, Ky., for respondents.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kawakita v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
Kawakita v. United States, 343 U.S. 717 (1952), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court reviewed a treason accusation against the defendant Tomoya Kawakita, a dual U.S./Japanese citizen. Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Vinson
United States Supreme Court
343 U.S. 717
Kawakita v. United States
Argued: April 3, 1952. --- Decided: June 2, 1952
See 73 S.Ct. 5.
[Syllabus from pages 717-719 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Morris Lavine, A. L. Wiren, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.
Mr. Oscar H Davis, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kawananakoa v. Polyblank

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
205 U.S. 349
Kawananakoa v. Polyblank
Argued: and submitted March 21, 1907. --- Decided: April 8, 1907
Mr. Sidney M. Ballou for appellants.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 349-351 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Aldis B. Browne, Alexander Britton, and E. A. Douthitt for appellees.
Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kay v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
303 U.S. 1
Kay v. United States
Argued: Dec. 10, 13, 1037. --- Decided: Jan 31, 1938
Messrs. Frank R. Serri, of Brooklyn, N.Y., and Wm. S.C.ulbertson, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Golden W. Bell, Asst. Sol. Gen., for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from page 2 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Late Lyrics and Earlier, With Many Other Verses/A Young Man's Exhortation

A YOUNG MAN'S EXHORTATION
CALL off your eyes from care By some determined deftness; put forth joys Dear as excess without the core that cloys, And charm Life's lourings fair.
Exalt and crown the hour That girdles us, and fill it full with glee, Blind glee, excelling aught could ever be Were heedfulness in power.
Send up such touching strains That limitless recruits from Fancy's pack Shall rush upon your tongue, and tender back All that your soul contains.
For what do we know best? That a fresh love-leaf crumpled soon will dry, And that men moment after moment die, Of all scope dispossest.
If I have seen one thing It is the passing preciousness of dreams; That aspects are within us; and who seems Most kingly is the King.
1867: Westbourne Park Villas.
# Late Lyrics and Earlier, With Many Other Verses/An Experience

AN EXPERIENCE
WIT, weight, or wealth there was not In anything that was said, In anything that was done; All was of scope to cause not A triumph, dazzle, or dread To even the subtlest one, My friend, To even the subtlest one.
But there was a new afflation— An aura zephyring round, That care infected not: It came as a salutation, And, in my sweet astound, I scarcely witted what Might pend, I scarcely witted what.
The hills in samewise to me Spoke, as they grayly gazed, —First hills to speak so yet!
The thin-edged breezes blew me What I, though cobwebbed, crazed, Was never to forget, My friend, Was never to forget!
# Late Lyrics and Earlier, With Many Other Verses/A Woman's Fancy

A WOMAN'S FANCY
"AH, Madam; you've indeed come bach here? 'Twas sad—your husband's so swift death, And you away! You shouldn't have left him: It hastened his last breath."
"Dame, I am not the lady you think me; I know not her, nor know her name; I've come to lodge here—a friendless woman; My health my only aim."
She came; she lodged. Wherever she rambled They held her as no other than The lady named; and told how her husband Had died a forsaken man.
So often did they call her thuswise Mistakenly, by that man's name, So much did they declare about him, That his past form and fame
Grew on her, till she pitied his sorrow As if she truly had been the cause— Yea, his deserter; and came to wonder What mould of man he was.
"Tell me my history!" would exclaim she; "Our history," she said mournfully. "But you know, surely, Ma'am?” they would answer, Much in perplexity.
Curious, she crept to his grave one evening, And a second time in the dusk of the morrow; Then a third time, with crescent emotion Like a bereaved wife's sorrow.
No gravestone rose by the rounded hillock; —"I marvel why this is?" she said. —"He had no kindred, Ma'am, but you near." —She set a stone at his head.
She learnt to dream of him, and told them: “In slumber often uprises he, And says: 'I am joyed that, after all, Dear, You've not deserted me!'"
At length died too this kinless woman, As he had died she had grown to crave; And at her dying she besought them To bury her in his grave.
Such said, she had paused; until she added: "Call me by his name on the stone, As I were, first to last, his dearest, Not she who left him lone!"
And this they did. And so it became there That, by the strength of a tender whim, The stranger was she who bore his name there, Not she who wedded him.
# Late Lyrics and Earlier, With Many Other Verses/After the War

AFTER THE WAR
LAST Post sounded Across the mead To where he loitered With absent heed. Five years before In the evening there Had flown that call To him and his Dear. "You'll never come back; Good-bye!" she had said; "Here I'll be living, And my Love dead!"
Those closing minims Had been as shafts darting Through him and her pressed In that last parting; They thrilled him not now, In the selfsame place With the selfsame sun
On his war-seamed face. "Lurks a god's laughter In this?" he said. "That I am the living And she the dead!"
# Late Lyrics and Earlier, With Many Other Verses/An Autumn Rain-scene

AN AUTUMN RAIN-SCENE
THERE trudges one to a merry-making With a sturdy swing, On whom the rain comes down.
To fetch the saving medicament Is another bent, On whom the rain comes down.
One slowly drives his herd to the stall Ere ill befall, On whom the rain comes down.
This bears his missives of life and death With quickening breath, On whom the rain comes down.
One watches for signals of wreck or war From the hill afar, On whom the rain comes down.
No care if he gain a shelter or none, Unhired moves one, On whom the rain comes down.
And another knows nought of its chilling fall Upon him at all, On whom the rain comes down.
October 1904.
# Late Lyrics and Earlier, With Many Other Verses/At Lulworth Cove a Century back

AT LULWORTH COVE A CENTURY BACK
HAD I but lived a hundred years ago I might have gone, as I have gone this year, By Warmwell Cross on to a Cove I know, And Time have placed his finger on me there:
"You see that man?"—I might have looked, and said, "O yes: I see him. One that boat has brought Which dropped down Channel round Saint Alban's Head. So commonplace a youth calls not my thought."
"You see that man?"—"Why yes; I told you; yes: Of an idling town-sort; thin; hair brown in hue;
And as the evening light scants less and less He looks up at a star, as many do."
"You see that man?"—"Nay, leave me!" then I plead, "I have fifteen miles to vamp across the lea, And it grows dark, and I am weary-kneed: I have said the third time; yes, that man I see!"
"Good. That man goes to Rome—to death, despair; And no one notes him now but you and I: A hundred years, and the world will follow him there, And bend with reverence where his ashes lie."
September 1920.
Note.—In September 1820 Keats, on his way to Rome, landed one day on the Dorset coast, and composed the sonnet, "Bright star! would I were steadfast as thou art." The spot of his landing is judged to have been Lulworth Cove.
# Late Lyrics and Earlier, With Many Other Verses/A Wife comes back

A WIFE COMES BACK
THIS is the story a man told me Of his life's one day of dreamery.
A woman came into his room Between the dawn and the creeping day: She was the years-wed wife from whom He had parted, and who lived far away, As if strangers they.
He wondered, and as she stood She put on youth in her look and air, And more was he wonderstruck as he viewed Her form and flesh bloom yet more fair While he watched her there;
Till she freshed to the pink and brown That were hers on the night when first they met,
When she was the charm of the idle town, And he the pick of the club-fire set. . . . His eyes grew wet,
And he stretched his arms: "Stay—rest!—" He cried. “Abide with me so, my own!" But his arms closed in on his hard bare breast; She had vanished with all he had looked upon Of her beauty: gone.
He clothed, and drew downstairs, But she was not in the house, he found; And he passed out under the leafy pairs Of the avenue elms, and searched around To the park-pale bound.
He mounted, and rode till night To the city to which she had long withdrawn, The vision he bore all day in his sight Being her young self as pondered on In the dim of dawn.
"—The lady here long ago— Is she now here?—young—or such age as she is?"
"—She is still here,"—"Thank God. Let her know; She'll pardon a comer so late as this Whom she'd fain not miss."
She received him—an ancient dame, Who hemmed, with features frozen and numb, "How strange!—I'd almost forgotten your name!— A call just now—is troublesome; Why did you come?”
# Late Lyrics and Earlier, With Many Other Verses/A Wet August

A WET AUGUST
NINE drops of water bead the jessamine, And nine-and-ninety smear the stones and tiles: —'Twas not so in that August—full-rayed, fine— When we lived out-of-doors, sang songs, strode miles.
Or was there then no noted radiancy Of summer? Were dun clouds, a dribbling bough, Gilt over by the light I bore in me, And was the waste world just the same as now?
It can have been so: yea, that threatenings Of coming down-drip on the sunless gray, By the then possibilities in things Were wrought more bright than brightest skies to-day.
1920.
# Late Lyrics and Earlier, With Many Other Verses/After a Romantic Day

AFTER A ROMANTIC DAY
THE railway bore him through An earthen cutting out from a city: There was no scope for view, Though the frail light shed by a slim young moon Fell like a friendly tune.
Fell like a liquid ditty, And the blank lack of any charm Of landscape did no harm. The bald steep cutting, rigid, rough, And moon-lit, was enough For poetry of place: its weathered face Formed a convenient sheet whereon The visions of his mind were drawn.
# Kaye v. Co-Ordinating Committee on Discipline of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
386 U.S. 17
Kaye v. Co-Ordinating Committee on Discipline of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York
Morton Liftin, for petitioner.
Angelo T. Cometa, for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kaye v. Co-Ordinating Committee on Discipline of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
386 U.S. 17
Kaye v. Co-Ordinating Committee on Discipline of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511, 87 S.Ct. 625.
Mr. Justice CLARK, Mr. Justice HARLAN, and Mr. Justice STEWART would affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions of Mr. Justice Harlan in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S., at 520, 87 S.Ct., at 631, and Garrity v. State of New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493, 500, 87 S.Ct. 616, 636.
Mr. Justice WHITE dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. State of New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S., at 530, 87 S.Ct., at 636.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kde domov můj

* related portals: National anthems, Czech lands, Czech literature.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
For the first time performed on December 21, 1834. Soon after Czechoslovakia was formed in 1918, the first strophe of the song became the Czech part of the national anthem. The split of Czechoslovakia in 1992 also divided the Czechoslovak anthem. The Czech Republic's national anthem has been legally adopted unextended, in its single-strophe version.Warning: template has been deprecated.
English-language translations of Kde domov můj include:
* The Bohemian National Hymn, My Fatherland, uncredited translation in Charities, vol. 13, no. 10 (1904)
* My Homeland, in Slavs on Southern Farms (1914), translated by Vincent Písek
* Bohemian National Hymn, uncredited translation in The Czechs of Cleveland (1919)
* Where is my home?, in the The Story of Prague, chapter 3 (1920), translated by Johann Georg Kohl
# Kellogg v. Forsyth (65 U.S. 186)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
65 U.S. 186
Kellogg v. Forsyth
The defendant in error recovered a judgment in ejectment in the Circuit Court of the United States for the northern district of Illinois against William Kellogg, deceased, as tenant in possession of a parcel of land in that district. After the judgment, the defendant died. The attorney of the decedent, who was also his landlord, and who had conducted the suit on behalf and in the name of the tenant, with his consent, sued out a writ of error to this court in the name of the heirs of said Kellogg. The bond for the prosecution of the writ, and the stipulation for costs in this court, have been supplied by the said attorney. One of the heirs of Kellogg objects to the prosecution of the writ of error, and alleges, on behalf of himself and his coheirs, that it is prosecuted without authority, and that they have no desire that it should be maintained, and authorize the attorney of the defendant in error to move for its dismissal. It appears to the court that the attorney of the deceased defendant is a bona fide claimant of the land, and that he is prosecuting the writ of error in good faith. That he is responsible for the costs and damages that may arise from the use of the names of the plaintiffs in error. The statutes of Illinois require that the declaration in ejectment shall be served upon the actual occupant, and the practice of the courts of that State authorizes the appearance of the landlord, and his defence of the suit, either in his own name or that of the tenant, with his consent. Williams v. Brunton, 3 Gilman R., 600.
And when a landlord has undertaken the defence of a suit in the name of the tenant, with his consent, the tenant cannot interfere with the cause to his prejudice. Doe v. Franklin, 7 Taun., 9. We think it was competent to the landlord to use the names of the plaintiffs to prosecute his writ of error upon his engagement to bear all the costs and expenses of the suit. Should the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded to the Circuit Court for further proceedings, he may apply in that court for leave to become defendant, instead of the heirs of the tenant.
Motion to dismiss overruled.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kellogg v. Forsyth (67 U.S. 571)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
67 U.S. 571
Kellogg v. Forsyth
Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
Mr. Ballance, of Illinois, for Plaintiffs in Error.
Mr. Williams, of Illinois, for Defendants.
Mr. Justice CLIFFORD.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kellogg Company v. National Biscuit Company (302 U.S. 777)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co., 305 U.S. 111 (1938), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the Kellogg Company was not violating any trademark or unfair competition laws when it manufactured its own Shredded Wheat breakfast cereal, which had originally been invented by the National Biscuit Company (later called Nabisco). Kellogg's version of the product was of an essentially identical shape, and was also marketed as "Shredded Wheat"; but Nabisco's patents had expired, and its trademark application for the term "Shredded Wheat" had been turned down as a descriptive, non-trademarkable term. Warning: template has been deprecated.

## Dissenting Opinion

    McReynolds
United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 777
Kellogg Company v. National Biscuit Company
Messrs. W. H. Crichton Clarke and Edward S. Rogers, both of New York City, and Robert T. McCracken, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.
Messrs. Thomas C. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., David A. Reed, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Drury W. Cooper and Charles A. Vilas, both of New York City, for respondent.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kellogg v. Forsyth

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Kellogg v. Forsyth."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Kellogg v. Forsyth (65 U.S. 186)
* Kellogg v. Forsyth (67 U.S. 571)
# Kellogg Company v. National Biscuit Company (302 U.S. 777)/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 777
Kellogg Company v. National Biscuit Company
For opinion below, see (C.C.A.) 91 F.(2d) 150.
Petition for rehearing denied.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kellogg Company v. National Biscuit Company (305 U.S. 111)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
305 U.S. 111
Kellogg Company v. National Biscuit Company
Argued: Oct. 10, 1938. --- Decided: Nov 14, 1938
See 305 U.S. 674, 59 S.Ct. 246, 83 L.Ed. --.
[Syllabus from pages 111-113 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Thomas D. Thacher and W. H. Crichton Clarke, both of New York City, for petitioner.
Mr. David A. Reed, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Kellogg Company v. National Biscuit Company

* Search for titles containing or beginning with: "Kellogg Company v. National Biscuit Company."
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
This is a disambiguation page. It lists works that share the same title. If an article link referred you here, please consider editing it to point directly to the intended page.
* Kellogg Company v. National Biscuit Company (302 U.S. 777)
* Kellogg Company v. National Biscuit Company (305 U.S. 111)
# Kellogg v. Forsyth (65 U.S. 186)

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
65 U.S. 186
Kellogg v. Forsyth
THIS was a branch of the three preceding cases, coming up from the same court.
Mr. Williams, counsel for the defendant in error, moved to dismiss the writ for the following reasons, viz:
That it is manifest by the record filed in this court in the said cause that the said writ of error was issued on the 15th day of July, 1859.
That the clerk's return thereto was filed with the clerk of this court on the 3d day of October, 1859.
That said return contains nothing but affidavits of the death, &c., of the original defendant, the writ of error, a bond to prosecute the same, a citation and acknowledgment of the service thereof.
That the detached record filed by the plaintiff, with the said return, was certified by the clerk of the Circuit Court on the 25th day of October, 1856, and is not attached to said return, or in any way referred to therein.
And therefore, he says, for said irregularities in the said proceedings patent on the face of the record of said cause, the said writ of error ought to be dismissed.
See Rules, Nos. 8 and 9.
Mr. Justice CAMPBELL delivered the opinion of the court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse