OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Ben King's Verse/Evolution

We seem to exist in a hazardous time,  Driftin' along here through space; Nobody knows just when we begun  Or how fur we've gone in the race. Scientists argy we're shot from the sun,  While others we're goin' right back, An' some say we've allers been here more or less,  An' seem to establish the fact. O' course 'at's somepin' 'at nobody knows,  As far as I've read or cun see; An' them as does know all about the hull scheme,  Why, none of 'em never agree.
Now, why I think it's a perilous time,--  What do we know 'bout them spots Up there on that glorious orb of the day?  Smart men has argyed an' lots Of the brainiest folks has been cypherin' out,  An' all sorts of stories has riz 'Bout what the sun's made of or how it's composed,  An' lots of 'em think that it is. O' course 'at's somepin' 'at nobody knows--  Nobody under the sun; Nary a body or bein', I s'pose;  Nary a bein but One.
Take Eva Lution, an' what does she say  'Bout how we all sprung from a ape? An' there's the goriller and big chimpanzee,  Patterned exactly our shape. An' I've seen some folks, an' I guess so have you,  An' it ain't non of our bizness neither, That actually looked like they sprung from a ape,  And didn't have fur to spring either. Course 'at's somepin 'at every one knows;  I don't see how you folks can doubt it; S'posin' they have some resemblance to us,  No use in a-writin' about it.
If a feller'll take a geology book  An' not go a rushin' long through it, But jes' sort o' figger the thing out hisself--  What I mean is: 'ply hisself to it-- He'll see we've dug up folks ten thousand years old,  Built on a ponderous plan; Somehow this knocks Mr. Moses all out,  An' Adam, the biblical man. O' course 'at's somepin' 'at nobody knows,  Nobody under the sun; Nary a body or bein' I s'pose,  Nary a bein' but One.
# Ben King's Verse/Gettin' Inter Shape

Reckon de angel what rolled 'way de stone,  An' let de good shepherd escape, Some day 'll fly down to dis prison ob sin An lib'rate all dat's prepahed to come in;  So I'se gittin' my soul inter shape, Gittin' my soul inter shape, fo' yo' see Hit's a mighty big stone dat's layin' on me,  Mighty big stone! Yes, indeedy!
I hope de good angel will hab heaps o' strength,  Or else bring old Samson along, Kase the sin on my soul's mo' 'en fo'ty foot deep; Yo' see, I bin one ob dese wanderin' sheep,  An' hit's gwine ter need somebody strong, Gwine ter need somebody strong, doan yo' see; Hit's a mighty big weight dat's a restin' on me.  Pow'ful big weight! Yes, indeedy!
I'se gittin' my soul inter shape fo' de day  When Peter 'gins takin' 'is toll; Ready ter lay down my burden an' rest, Ready ter take up de cross ob de blest,  Ready ter entah de fol'. Gittin' my soul inter shape, doan yo' see; Dar's a big load ob sin bin restin' on me,  Big load ob sin! Yes, indeedy!  Yes, indeedy!
# Ben King's Verse/Gord Only Knows

I saw an old beggar dis mawnin', Lucindy,
De weathaw was col' an' bleak an' windy,
 An' de fros' took hold
 Ob de end ob his nose.
 Whar wus he goin'?
 Gord only knows, chile,
 Gord only knows.
All he had on was an ole woolen jacket.
An' pants dat had done seed a mighty ha'd racket,
 His shoes war all out,
 Kase I saw his toes.
 Whar wus he goin'?
 Gord only knows, chile,
 Gord only knows.
He said his gran'chillun had turned him away,
Wid nuffin' to eat on las' Thanksgibin' Day.
 Wid no ovahcoat,
 He looked about froze.
 Whar was he goin'?
 Gord only knows, chile,
 Gord only knows.
He lifted his han's, day was bony an' blue, An' axed me was dis hyar de main avenue,  Den walked ovah dar  To dose ten'ment rows.  Had he friends in dar?  Gord only knows, chile,  Gord only knows.
I doan bleb in treatin' a gran'fader so, Kase some day it's comin' right squar back yer know.  An, when we grow ole  An' come to de snows,  Den who'll keer fo' us?  Gord only knows, chile,  Gord only knows.
Gord keeps account ob de sparrers dat fall, We stan' a-waitin' we soon hyar him call.  Gord brings de wintah,  De rain an' de snows,  Gord makes de win' blow,  But jes' whar it goes,  Gord only knows, chile,  Gord only knows.
# Ben King's Verse/Ec-a-lec-tic Fits

I'm only jes' a little chap,
 An' my ma says I'm frail;
I got ec-a-lec-tic fits, '  At's why I'm lookin' pale.
Once I had a ague chill,
 An', oh, how I did shake ' 'Cause aunty wouldn't give me any
 Jelly tarts an' cake!
Once when it was summer
 Once, an' nice an' warm, nen me
An' Jennie went in our back yard  'Nd climbed a cherry tree.
An' she ate all the cherries, too,
 An' fed me all the pits,
An' my ma said 'at's jes' what give
 Me ec-a-lec-tic fits.
When bad girls comes to our house
 They mustn't scare me, too,
An' romp up quick against me
 Like they's playin' peek-a-boo, 'Cause ma she'll say right out to 'em:  "See here, now, children, quit!
I guess you'll have to run right home  'Fore Wadsworth has a fit."
Sometime I'll be strong 'nd well
 An' big like Uncle Dan,
An' he'll be little jes' like me,
 When I'm a grown-up man,
'Nd nen I won't be scarin' people  Almost out their wits, 'Cause 'en I won't go 'round a-havin'  Ec-a-lec-tic fits.
When you see me turnin' blue  An' when my hands gits cold,
Don't you git afraid o' that;  But jes' you git a hold Of me, an' rub my hands,  'Nd rub my neck 'nd head Till I "come out"—-'cause if you don't  I'm li'ble to git dead.
I wouldn't care if I should die  'Nd go up there, would you, Where the sun is peekin' 'round  The clouds, up where it's blue? 'Cause there they ain't no worry,  An' they's lots o' little bits Of fellers, an' they's none of 'em  Got ec-a-lec-tic fits.
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Archdiocese of Durango (Durangum)

From volume 5 of the work.
(DURANGUM)
Archdiocese located in north-western Mexico. The see was created 28 Sept., 1620, seventy-two years after the Friars Diego de la Cadena and Gerónimo de Mendoza had established the San Juan Bautista de Analco mission in the valley of the Sierra Madre. The city of Durango was founded in 1554 by the Spanish captain Ibarra, and served at once as a centre for numerous missionaries, whose efforts to convert the natives were so successful that under Philip III the Diocese of Guadalajara was divided by Paul V, and Durango was raised to episcopal rank. The first bishop, Gonzalo Hernandez y Hermosillo, devoted much time to the evangelization and spiritual welfare of the Indians. In the beginning the Diocese of Durango included New Mexico (Santa Fe), Chihuahua, and Sonora; eventually these were made independent sees. Durango was made an archdiocese by Leo XIII (23 June, 1891), and now includes all the State of Durango and part of Zacatecas, with Sonora, Chihuahua, and Sinaloa for suffragans. The first archbishop was Vicente Salinas. Among the remarkable bishops of the see were the scholarly Gorospe, to whom the city owes its canal; the famous writer Legaspi, who began the cathedral that was finished and consecrated by Antonio Zubiría y Escalante, and lately decorated anew by Archbishop Santiago Zubiría y Manzanera. The Catholic press is represented by "El Domingo", and the "Boletin Eclesiastico". Besides the Escuelas Guadalaupanas there are two colleges, the Colegio Guadalupano and a college of the Brothers of Mary. The territory of the diocese is quite mountainous and is watered only by a few streams, but is well adapted for grazing. There are many rich mines of gold, silver, and iron. In 1900 the population of the State of Durango was 307,274, that of the city 31,092. The latter, known also as Guadiana and Ciudad de Victoria, stands picturesquely at 6700 feet above sea-level, and has several important industries and a large trade in cattle and leather.
REGINALDO GUERECA.
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Archdiocese of Fermo

From volume 6 of the work.
(FIRMANA).
In the province of Ascoli Piceno (Central Italy). The great antiquity of the episcopal city is attested by the remains of its cyclopean walls. It was the site of a Roman colony, established in 264 B.C., consisting of 6000 men. With the Pentapolis it passed in the eighth century under the authority of the Holy See and underwent thenceforth the vicissitudes of the March of Ancona. Under the predecessors of Honorius III the bishops of city became the counts, and later princes, of Fermo. In the contest between the Hohenstaufen and the papacy, Fermo was several times besieged and captured; in 1176 by Archbishop Christian of Mainz, in 1192 by Henry Vl, in 1208 by Marcuald, Duke of Ravenna, in 1241 by Frederick 11, in 1245 by Manfred. After this it was governed by different lords, who ruled as more or less legitimate vassals of the Holy See, e.g. the Monteverdi, Giovanni Visconti, and Francesco Storza (banished 1446), Oliverotto Uffreducci (murdered in 1503 by Caesar Borgia), who was succeeded by his son Ludovico, killed at the battle of Monto Giorgio in 1520, when Fermo became again directly subjected to the Holy See. Boniface VIII (1204-1303) established a university there. Fermo is the birth place of the celebrated poet, Annibale Caro.
Local legend attributes the first preaching of the Gospel at Fermo to Sts. Apollinarius and Maro. The martyrdom of the bishop, St. Alexander, with seventy companions, is placed in the persecution of Decius (250), and the martyrdom of St. Philip under Aurelian (270-75). Among the noteworthy bishops are: Passinus, the recipient of four letters from Gregory III; Cardinal Domenico Caspranica (1426): Sigismondo Zanettini (1584), under whom Fermo was made the seat of an archdiocese; Giambattista Rinuccini, nuncio in Ireland; and Alessandro Borgia. The suffragans of Fermo are Macerata-Tolentino, Montalto, Ripatransone, and San Severino. The archdiocese has (1908) a population of 18,000; 117 parishes; 368 secular priests and 86 regular; 2 male and 5 female educational institutions; 6 religious houses of men and 50 of women; and a Catholic weekly, the "Voce delle Marche".
U. BENIGNI
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Archdiocese of Fogaras

From volume 6 of the work.
ARCHDIOCESE OF FOGARAS (FOGARASIENSIS).
Archdiocese in Hungary, of the Greek-Rumanian Rite. It has three suffragan sees, Grosswardein (Nagy Várad), Lugos, and Szamos Ujvár (Armenopolis). Since 1733 the residence has been at Balászfalva (Blaj, Blasendorf). The Diocese of Fogaras was erected in 1721, suffragan to the Primate of Hungary (the Latin Archbishop of Gran). In 1853 Pius IX re-established the archbishopric of Alba Julia (Weissenburg, Karlsburg), an ancient metropolitan title, and united it with the See of Fogaras. Since that time the head of the Greek-Rumanian Church bears the title of Archbishop of Fogaras and Alba Julia. Since 1697 (Synod of Karlsburg), when these Rumanians returned to Catholic unity, there have been eleven Catholic titulars of Alba Julia or Fogaras.
The city of Fogaras (6000 inhabitants) (in German Fagreschmarkt) is built on the Aluta. Its fortress played an important part in all the wars with the Turks. In 1849 the Hungarians were defeated here by the Russians. Balászfalva, the residence of the archbishop, has also about 6000 inhabitants. Here, in 1848, the Rumanians protested against political union with Hungary. The archdiocese numbers 440,000 Rumanian Catholics. There are 720 priests, nearly all married, 705 parishes, as many churches, and several chapels. The preparatory and theological seminaries are at Blaj, also a college and a printing establishment, where the weekly journal "Unirea" has been published since 1890. The diocesan schools for boys and girls are attended by 60,000 pupils. There are 3 gymnasia for boys or girls, and several convents.
S. VAILHÉ
# Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Archdiocese of Evora

From volume 5 of the work.
Evora, Archdiocese of, in Portugal, raised to archiepiscopal rank in 1544, at which time it was given as suffragans Leiria and Portalegre; in 1570 and later were added Sylves, Ceuta, Congo, Santo Thome, Funchal, Cabo Verde, and Angra. In the Roman period Julius Caesar gave it the name of Liberalitas Julia; inscriptions and coins remain to prove its high rank among the municipalities of Roman Spain. Its bishop, Quintianus, was present at the Council of Elvira early in the fourth century. There exists no complete list of his successors for the next two centuries, though some are known from ancient diptychs. In 584 the Visigothic king, Leovirgild, incorporated with his state the Kingdom of the Suevi, to which Evora had hitherto belonged. From the sixth and seventh centuries there remain a few Christian inscriptions pertaining to Evora. In one of them has been interpolated the name of a Bishop Julian (December 1, 566); he is, however, inadmissible. Thenceforth the episcopal list is known from the reign of Reccared (586) to the Arab invasion (714), after which the succession is quite unknown for four centuries and a half, with the exception of the epitaph of a Bishop Daniel (January, 1100). Until the reconquest (1166) by Alfonso I of Portugal, Evora was suffragan to Merida. Under this king it became suffragan to Braga, despite the protests of the Archbishops of Compostella, administrators of Merida. In 1274, however, the latter succeeded in bringing Evora within their jurisdiction. Finally, it became suffragan to Lisbon from 1394 to 1544, when it was made an archbishopric. Its large and splendid cathedral has undergone many architectural changes. Among its illustrious prelates may be mentioned Enrique (1540-64, 1578-80), the founder of its university and King of Portugal (1578-80); Teutonio de Braganza (1570-1602); and the scholarly writers Alfonso de Portugal (1486-522) and Father Manuel de Cenaculo Villasboas (1802-14). Portuguese writers have maintained that the first bishop of Evora was St. Mantius, a Roman, and a disciple of Jesus Christ, sent by the Apostles into Spain as a missionary of the Gospel; from his genuine acts it appears that he was a devout Christian, put to death by the Jews after the fourth century. Spanish Jews, it is known, are mentioned in the fourth-century Council of Elvira (can. 49).
F. FITA
# Camp v. Gress

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
250 U.S. 308
Camp v. Gress
Argued: March 24 and 25, 1919. --- Decided: June 2, 1919
[Syllabus from 308-309 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. T. D. Savage and Thomas H. Willcox, both of Norfolk, Va., for petitioners.
Messrs. D. Lawrence Groner, of Norfolk, Va., W. M. Toomer, of Jacksonville, Fla., and Alexander Akerman, of Macon, Ga., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Camp v. Arkansas

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
404 U.S. 69
Camp v. Arkansas
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas
No. 70-353
Certiorari granted; 249 Ark. 1075, 467 S.W. 2d 707, reversed and remanded.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Camp v. Arkansas/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Per Curiam Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
404 U.S. 69
Camp v. Arkansas
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. Petitioner's alleged procedural default does not bar consideration of his constitutional claim in the circumstances of this case. See Henry v. Mississippi, 379 U.S. 443, 447-449, 85 S.Ct. 564, 567-568, 13 L.Ed.2d 408 (1965). The judgment of the Supreme Court of Arkansas is reversed. Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609, 85 S.Ct. 1229, 14 L.Ed.2d 106 (1965). The case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Camp v. Boyd

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
229 U.S. 530
Camp v. Boyd
Argued: March 3 and 5, 1913. --- Decided: June 9, 1913
Messrs. Hugh T. Taggart and William E. Ambrose for appellant.
Messrs. R. Ross Perry, William F. Mattingly, John B. Larner, and R. Ross Perry, Jr., for appellees.
Mr. Justice Pitney delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Blakey v. Brinson

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
286 U.S. 254
Blakey v. Brinson
Argued: April 21, 1932. --- Decided: May 16, 1932
Messrs. Henry Eastman Hackney, of Uniontown, Pa., and George P. Barse, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 255-256 intentionally omitted]
Mr. L. I. Moore, of New Bern, N. C., for respondent.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 255-256 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. George P. Barse and F. G. Awalt, both of Washington, D. C., amicus curiae.
Mr. Justice STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Blame not my lute

Blame not my lute, for he must sound Of this or that as liketh me: For lack of wit the lute is bound To give such tunes as pleaseth me. Though my songs be somewhat strange, And speaks such words as touch thy change,  Blame not my lute.
My lute, alas, doth not offend, Though that perforce he must agree To sound such tunes as I intend To sing to them that heareth me. Then though my songs he somewhat plain, And toucheth some that use to feign,  Blame not my lute.
My lute and strings may not deny, But as I strike they must obey: Break not them then so wrongfully, But wreak thyself some wiser way. And though the songs which I indite Do quit thy change with rightful spite,  Blame not my lute.
Spite asketh spite, and changing change, And falsèd faith must needs be known; The fault so great, the case so strange, Of right it must abroad be blown. Then since that by thine own desert My songs do tell how true thou art,  Blame not my lute.
Blame but thyself, that hast misdone And well deservèd to have blame; Change thou thy way so evil begun, And then my lute shall sound that same. But if till then my fingers play By thy desert their wonted way,  Blame not my lute.
Farewell, unknown, for though thou break My strings in spite with great disdain, Yet have I found out for thy sake Strings for to string my lute again. And if perchance this foolish rhyme Do make thee blush at any time,  Blame not my lute.
This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Blake v. William Openhym & Sons

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
216 U.S. 322
Blake v. William Openhym & Sons
Argued: January 12, 1910. --- Decided: February 21, 1910
Messrs. Edwin A. Krauthoff, Alexander New, Samuel Feller, Arthur Miller, and J. V. C. Karnes for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from Page 323 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Benjamin N. Cardozo, I. J. Ringolsky, Morris J. Hirsch, and David I. White for appellees.
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Blamberg Bros. v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
260 U.S. 452
Blamberg Bros. v. United States
Argued: Dec. 5, 1922. --- Decided: Jan 2, 1923
Messrs. D. Roger Englar and Harold V. Amberg, both of New York City, for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 453-456 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Solicitor General Beck, of Washington, D. C., for the United states.
Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Breedlove v. Nicolet

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
32 U.S. 413
Breedlove v. Nicolet

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Breen v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Concurring Opinions

    Harlan
    Brennan
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 460
Breen v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16
Argued: Nov. 19, 1969. --- Decided: Jan 26, 1970
Emanuel Margolis, Stamford, Conn., for petitioner.
William Ruckelshaus, Washington, D.C., for respondents.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Breen v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16/Concurrence Brennan

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Concurring Opinions Harlan Brennan
United States Supreme Court
396 U.S. 460
Breen v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16
Argued: Nov. 19, 1969. --- Decided: Jan 26, 1970
Mr. Justice BRENNAN, concurring.
In Oestereich v. Selective Service Board, 393 U.S. 233, 89 S.Ct. 414 21 L.Ed.2d 402 (1968), I joined Mr. Justice Stewart's dissent expressing the view that § 10(b)(3) was designed to permit judicial review of draft classifications only in connection with criminal prosecutions or habeas corpus proceedings. 393 U.S., at 245, 89 S.Ct., at 420-421. But continued adherence to that construction is foreclosed by the Court's holding in that case that § 10(b)(3) did not preclude pre-induction judicial review of the case of a registrant entitled to a statutory exemption. Therefore, because I too 'fail to see any relevant practical or legal differences between exemptions and deferments,' I join the opinion of the Court.
Mr. Justice STEWART, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE joins, concurring in part.
For the reasons expressed by Mr. Justice BRENNAN, I join the opinion of the Court insofar as it holds that the District Court had jurisdiction to entertain the petitioner's suit and should have granted him the injunction he sought. I do not, however, join the Court's opinion insofar as it holds that the delinquency regulations have not been authorized by Congress. See Gutknecht v. United States, ante, 396 U.S., p. 314, 90 S.Ct., p. 515 (concurring in judgment).

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Breedlove v. Suttles

United States Supreme Court
302 U.S. 277
Breedlove v. Suttles
Argued: Nov. 16, 17, 1937. --- Decided: Dec 6, 1937
[Syllabus from pages 277-279 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. J. Ira Harrelson, of Atlanta, Ga., Henry G. Van Veen and Arthur Garfield Hays, both of New York City, for appellant.
Messrs. W. § Northcutt and E. Harold Sheats, both of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.
Mr. Justice BUTLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse