OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/18th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 96

Chap. XCVI.—An Act to establish the city of Hudson and the city of Troy, in the state of New York, Bowdoinham, in the state of Maine, and Fairport, in the state of Ohio, ports of delivery, and to abolish Topsham as a port of delivery.
The cities of Hudson and Troy, in New York, &c. made ports of delivery.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the city of Hudson and the city of Troy, in the state of New York, Bowdoinham, in the district of Bath, in the state of Maine, and Fairport, in the district of Cuyahoga, in the state of Ohio, be, and the same are hereby, severally, made, a port of delivery.
The port of delivery at Topsham, in Maine, abolished.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the port of delivery established at Topsham, in the state of Maine, be, and the same is hereby, abolished.
Approved, March 3, 1825.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/19th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 1

Chapter I.—An Act making appropriation for compensation to the members and officers, and for the contingent expenses, of the two houses of Congress.
Compensation to the Senators and members of the House of Representatives, &c., for fuel, &c. 1826, ch. 13.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the sum of four hundred and fifty-five thousand dollars be, and the same is hereby, appropriated, for compensation to the Senators and members of the House of Representatives, and delgates of territories, their officers and attendants; and the further sum of eighty thousand dollars, for fuel, stationery, and all other contingent expenses of the two Houses of Congress, and that the said sums be paid out of any money in the treasury not otherwise appropriated.
Approved, December 23, 1825.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/19th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 10

Chap. X.—An Act to extend the limits of Georgetown, in the District of Columbia.
Act of March 3, 1809, ch. 30. Limits of Georgetown extended, westwardly, &c.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in addition to the limits prescribed by an act supplementary to an act, entitled “An act to amend the charter of Georgetown,” approved third of March, eighteen hundred and nine, the said limits between Seventh and Eighth streets shall be further extended, so as to extend westwardly, from Fayette street, three hundred feet.
Approved, March 3, 1826.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/18th Congress/2nd Session/Chapter 99

Chap. XCIX.—An Act to authorize the register or enrolment and license to be issued in the name of the president or secretary of any incorporated company owning a steamboat or vessel.
Enrolments and licenses for steamboats, &c. owned by any incorporated company.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That enrolments and licenses for steamboats or vessels, owned by any incorporated company, may be issued in the name of the president or secretary of such company; and that such enrolments and licenses shall not be vacated or affected by a sale of any share or shares of any stockholder, or stockholders, in such company.
Register for steamboats.Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That registers for steamboats or vessels, owned by any incorporated company, may be issued in the name of the president or secretary of such company; and that such register shall not be vacated or affected by a sale of any share or shares of any stockholder or stockholders in such company.
Upon the death, &c. of the president, a new license shall be taken out.Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That, upon the death, removal, or resignation, of the president or secretary of any incorporated company, owning any steamboat or vessel, a new register, or enrolment and license, as the case may be, shall be taken out for such steamboat or vessel.
That previously to granting a register, the oath as to the ownership of the steamboat, to be taken.Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That, previously to granting a register, or enrolment and license, for any steamboat or vessel, owned by any company, the president or secretary of such company shall swear, or affirm, as to the ownership or such steamboat or vessel, by such company, without designating the names of the persons composing such company; which oath, or affirmation, shall be deemed sufficient, without requiring the oath or affirmation of any other person interested or concerned in such steamboat or vessel.
Before granting a register, oath that no part of such steamboat, &c. is owned by any foreigner.Sec. 5. And be it further enacted, That, before granting a register for any steamboat or vessel, so owned by any incorporated company, the president or secretary thereof shall swear, or affirm, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, no part of such steamboat or vessel has been, or is then, owned by any foreigner or foreigners.
Approved, March 3, 1825.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/18th Congress/2nd Session/Resolution 1

I. Resolution authorizing the public documents, printed by order of Congress, to be furnished to the Gardiner Lyceum.
One copy of Seybert’s Statistical Annals, &c., to be furnished the Gardiner Lyceum.Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That one copy of Seybert’s Statistical Annals, and of Pitkin’s Statistical View, and also one copy of the public journals of the Senate and House of Representatives, and of the documents published under the orders of the Senate and House of Representatives, respectively, which have been, or shall be, published, by virtue of a resolution passed December twenty-seventh, one thousand eight hundred and thirteen, be transmitted to the executive of the state of Maine, for the use and benefit of the Gardiner Lyceum, in said state.
Approved, March 3, 1825.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/19th Congress/1st Session/Chapter 109

Chap. CIX.—An Act to extend the width of the Washington canal.
Washington Canal Company authorized to increase the width of the Washington canal.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Washington Canal Company be, and are hereby, authorized to increase the width of the Washington Canal, from Seventh street west, to its western ​extremity, by removing its southern boundary to a distance not exceeding one hundred and fifty feet from its northern boundary; and also to form a basin on the canal between Sixth and Seventh streets west, according to such plan as shall be approved by the President of the United States.
Approved, May 20, 1826.
# United States Statutes at Large/Volume 4/18th Congress/2nd Session/Resolution 2

II. Resolution directing an inventory of the furniture in the President’s house to be taken.
An inventory of the furniture of the President’s house to be taken.Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the commissioner of the public buildings be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to take an inventory of the furniture of the President’s house, at such time as may be convenient to the President, and to deliver a copy thereof to the President elect, and one copy to each House of Congress.
Approved, March 3, 1825.
# United States Code/Title 11/Chapter 3/Section 308

§ 308. Debtor reporting requirements
    (a) For purposes of this section, the term “profitability” means, with respect to a debtor, the amount of money that the debtor has earned or lost during current and recent fiscal periods.
    (b) A small business debtor shall file periodic financial and other reports containing information including—
       (1) the debtor’s profitability;
       (2) reasonable approximations of the debtor’s projected cash receipts and cash disbursements over a reasonable period;
       (3) comparisons of actual cash receipts and disbursements with projections in prior reports;
       (4)
          (A) whether the debtor is—
             (i) in compliance in all material respects with postpetition requirements imposed by this title and the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure; and
             (ii) timely filing tax returns and other required government filings and paying taxes and other administrative expenses when due;
          (B) if the debtor is not in compliance with the requirements referred to in subparagraph (A)(i) or filing tax returns and other required government filings and making the payments referred to in subparagraph (A)(ii), what the failures are and how, at what cost, and when the debtor intends to remedy such failures; and
          (C) such other matters as are in the best interests of the debtor and creditors, and in the public interest in fair and efficient procedures under chapter 11 of this title.
# United States Code/Title 11/Chapter 3/Section 323

§ 323. Role and capacity of trustee
    (a) The trustee in a case under this title is the representative of the estate.
    (b) The trustee in a case under this title has capacity to sue and be sued.
# United States Code/Title 11/Chapter 3/Section 306

§ 306. Limited appearance
An appearance in a bankruptcy court by a foreign representative in connection with a petition or request under section 303 or 305 of this title does not submit such foreign representative to the jurisdiction of any court in the United States for any other purpose, but the bankruptcy court may condition any order under section 303 or 305 of this title on compliance by such foreign representative with the orders of such bankruptcy court.
# United States Code/Title 11/Chapter 3/Section 307

§ 307. United States trustee
The United States trustee may raise and may appear and be heard on any issue in any case or proceeding under this title but may not file a plan pursuant to section 1121 (c) of this title.
# United States Code/Title 11/Chapter 3/Section 321

§ 321. Eligibility to serve as trustee
    (a) A person may serve as trustee in a case under this title only if such person is—
       (1) an individual that is competent to perform the duties of trustee and, in a case under chapter 7, 12, or 13 of this title, resides or has an office in the judicial district within which the case is pending, or in any judicial district adjacent to such district; or
       (2) a corporation authorized by such corporation’s charter or bylaws to act as trustee, and, in a case under chapter 7, 12, or 13 of this title, having an office in at least one of such districts.
    (b) A person that has served as an examiner in the case may not serve as trustee in the case.
    (c) The United States trustee for the judicial district in which the case is pending is eligible to serve as trustee in the case if necessary.
# United States Code/Title 11/Chapter 3/Section 325

§ 325. Effect of vacancy
A vacancy in the office of trustee during a case does not abate any pending action or proceeding, and the successor trustee shall be substituted as a party in such action or proceeding.
# United States Code/Title 11/Chapter 3/Section 305

§ 305. Abstention
(a) The court, after notice and a hearing, may dismiss a case under this title, or may suspend all proceedings in a case under this title, at any time if— (1) the interests of creditors and the debtor would be better served by such dismissal or suspension; or (2) (A) a petition under section 1515 for recognition of a foreign proceeding has been granted; and (B) the purposes of chapter 15 of this title would be best served by such dismissal or suspension. (b) A foreign representative may seek dismissal or suspension under subsection (a)(2) of this section. (c) An order under subsection (a) of this section dismissing a case or suspending all proceedings in a case, or a decision not so to dismiss or suspend, is not reviewable by appeal or otherwise by the court of appeals under section 158 (d), 1291, or 1292 of title 28 or by the Supreme Court of the United States under section 1254 of title 28.
# United States Code/Title 11/Chapter 3/Section 322

§ 322. Qualification of trustee
    (a) Except as provided in subsection (b)(1), a person selected under section 701, 702, 703, 1104, 1163, 1202, or 1302 of this title to serve as trustee in a case under this title qualifies if before seven days after such selection, and before beginning official duties, such person has filed with the court a bond in favor of the United States conditioned on the faithful performance of such official duties.
    (b)
       (1) The United States trustee qualifies wherever such trustee serves as trustee in a case under this title.
       (2) The United States trustee shall determine—
          (A) the amount of a bond required to be filed under subsection (a) of this section; and
          (B) the sufficiency of the surety on such bond.
    (c) A trustee is not liable personally or on such trustee’s bond in favor of the United States for any penalty or forfeiture incurred by the debtor.
    (d) A proceeding on a trustee’s bond may not be commenced after two years after the date on which such trustee was discharged.
# United States Code/Title 11/Chapter 3/Section 324

§ 324. Removal of trustee or examiner
    (a) The court, after notice and a hearing, may remove a trustee, other than the United States trustee, or an examiner, for cause.
    (b) Whenever the court removes a trustee or examiner under subsection (a) in a case under this title, such trustee or examiner shall thereby be removed in all other cases under this title in which such trustee or examiner is then serving unless the court orders otherwise.
# United States patent X2339A

* related portals: Patents.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
# United States patent X1820

* related portals: Patents.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
# United States patent X246

* related portals: Patents.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
# United States patent X306

* related portals: Patents.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
# United States patent X2339B

* related portals: Patents.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
# United States patent X51

* related portals: Patents.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
January 29th 1793, w:Samuel Morey
# United States patent X1

* related portals: Patents.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons category, Wikidata item.
* The United States
* To all to whom these Presents shall come, Greeting.
City of New York July 31st. 1790.
Attorney General for the United States.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Arnold Schwinn & Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
388 U.S. 365
United States v. Arnold Schwinn & Company
Argued: April 20, 1967. --- Decided: June 12, 1967
[Syllabus from pages 365-366 intentionally omitted]
Richard A. Posner, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Robert C. Keck, Chicago, Ill., and Earl E. Pollock, Washington, D.C., for appellees.
Mr. Justice FORTAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Arwo/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
86 U.S. 486
United States v. Arwo
Instead of answering separately the questions certified here, I am instructed to say, that the court, upon the facts alleged in the plea, is of the opinion, that the Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York had jurisdiction in this case, and that the court directs that this statement be certified to the Circuit Court as the only answer required to the several questions presented on the record.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Arnulfo Chavez

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
228 U.S. 525
United States v. Arnulfo Chavez
Argued: April 11, 1913. --- Decided: May 5, 1913
Assistant Attorney General Adkins and Mr. Karl W. Kirchwey for plaintiff in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 525-527 intentionally omitted]
No appearance for defendant in error.
Mr. Chief Justice White delivered the opinion of the court:

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Code/Title 9

From the Cornell Law School U.S. Code Collection
* Chapter 1. General Provisions
* Chapter 2. Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
* Chapter 3. Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration
# United States Coy v. United States

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
316 U.S. 342
United States Coy v. United States
Argued: May 4, 5, 1942. --- Decided: May 25, 1942
Mr. James E. Fahey and Mr. A. Shelby Winstead, both of Louisville, Ky., for petitioner.
Mr. H. G. Ingraham, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States Constitution

* related portals: Constitution of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Commons gallery, Commons category, quotes, textbook, Wikidata item.
The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the United States. The Constitution, originally comprising seven articles, delineates the national frame of government. Its first three articles embody the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress; the executive, consisting of the President; and the judicial, consisting of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. Articles Four, Five and Six embody concepts of federalism, describing the rights and responsibilities of state governments and of the states in relationship to the federal government. Article Seven establishes the procedure subsequently used by the thirteen States to ratify it. It is regarded as the oldest written and codified constitution in force of the world.
* Constitution of the United States of America, the original version
* United States Constitution, broadside printed by John Carter (1745–1814) of Providence, Rhode Island
* Constitution of the United States, in the United States Statutes at Large
* Constitution of the United States as prefixed to the Statutes of California, 1850.
* “Constitution of the United States,” in the American Pocket Library of Useful Knowledge (1841), by Thomas Curtis Clarke
# United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304 (1936), was a United States Supreme Court case involving principles of both governmental regulation of business and the supremacy of the executive branch of the federal government to conduct foreign affairs. Warning: template has been deprecated.
United States Supreme Court
299 U.S. 304
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation
Argued: Nov. 19, 20, 1936. --- Decided: Dec 21, 1936
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
[Syllabus from pages 304-306 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Homer S.C.ummings, Atty. Gen., and Martin Conboy, of New York City (Messrs. Stanley F. Reed, Sol. Gen., Brien McMahon, Asst. Atty. Gen., and William W. Barron and Charles A. Horsky, both of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for the United States.
Messrs. George Z. Medalie, J. Edward Lumbard, Jr., and Theodore S. Hope, Jr., all of New York City, for appellee Samuel J. Abelow.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# United States v. Curtis Curtis/Opinion of the Court

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
United States Supreme Court
100 U.S. 119
United States v. Curtis Curtis
To the error assigned by the defendants it is sufficient to say that, having been served with the writ, and appeared by counsel, and having thereafter suffered a voluntary default, that default was a confession of indebtedness on account of the breach of the bond assigned; namely, the failure of Holman, their principal, to pay over the moneys in his hands when thereunto required, and of such demand as imposed upon his sureties the obligation to pay. There remained only the question of the amount due from him on account of moneys in his hands, and of this the auditor's statement of account was evidence which was uncontradicted. There is, therefore, no error of which they can complain.
The United States, however, asserted a right to interest on the amount found due by the auditor from the date at which Holman ceased to be paymaster, namely, Nov. 30, 1865.
Without attempting to decide any other case but this, we are of opinion that the breach of the bond on which the defendants were sued did not occur until Holman, his legal representatives, or his sureties, were required to refund moneys in his hands; that is, until some notice was given that a definite sum in his hands had by the proper accounting officer been found to be due to the United States. Of course, until there was a breach of the condition of the bond, which rendered him or his sureties liable, there could be no right to interest on account of such breach.
The agreed statement shows that no such statement was made or rendered to Holman in his lifetime, or any demand to refund. Nor does it appear that any such statement was rendered to his executors, or a demand made of them or of the sureties, except by the service of the writ.
We are, therefore, of opinion that the earliest moment at which any one became liable on account of the breach of the condition of the bond now sued on was the service of the writ on the defendants, and that such service was a sufficient demand. The court properly allowed interest on that basis.
Judgment affirmed.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse