OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Executive Order 10020

more info.
See the Notes section for a listing of Executive Orders affected by or related to the issuance of this Executive Order.
Signed by President Harry S. Truman Tuesday, December 7, 1948
Federal Register page & date: 13 FR 7519, Wednesday, December 8, 1948
By virtue of the authority vested in me by Chapter II of the act of Congress entitled ‘‘An Act to amend an act entitled ‘An Act for making further and more effectual provision for the national defense, and for other purposes,’ approved June 3, 1916, and to establish military justice,’’ approved June 4, 1920 (41 Stat. 787), as amended by Title II of the act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for the common defense by increasing the strength of the armed forces of the United States, including the reserve components thereof, and for other purposes,’’ approved June 24, 1948 (62 Stat. 627), and as President of the United States, I hereby prescribe the following Manual for Courts-martial to be designated as ‘‘Manual for Courts-Martial, U.S. Army, 1949’’.
This manual shall be in force and effect in the Army of the United States on and after February 1, 1949 with respect to all court-martial processes taken on or after February 1, 1949:
    Provided, that nothing contained in this manual shall be construed to invalidate any investigation, trial in which arraignment has been had, or other action begun prior to February 1, 1949; and any such investigation, trial, or action so begun may be completed in accordance with the provisions of the Manual for Courts-Martial, 1928:
    Provided further, that nothing contained in this manual shall be construed to make punishable any act done or omitted prior to the effective date of this manual which was not punishable when done or omitted:
    And provided further, that the maximum punishment for an offense committed prior to February 1, 1949, shall not exceed the applicable limit in effect at the time of the commission of such offense.

## Notes
### EDITOR's NOTE

* The 450+ pages that accompanies EO 10020 and makes up most of the MCM of 1949 can be found HERE, (PDF)

### Supersedes

* Executive Order 4773, November 29, 1927

### Amended by

* Executive Order 10026, January 4, 1949;
* Executive Order 10149, August 8, 1950

### Superseded by

* Executive Order 10214, February 8, 1951
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 1004

more info.
Amends Executive Order 209, March 20, 1903. Restored a provision which was contained in the civil service rules from May 27, 1889, to April 15, 1903.
Signed by President Theodore Roosevelt Saturday, January 9, 1909
Rule X is hereby amended by the addition of a paragraph to be numbered 11, to read as follows:
The White House
       January 9, 1909.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Executive Order 1003

more info.
Signed by President Theodore Roosevelt Thursday, January 7, 1909
General Orders, No. 7, War Dept., January 16, 1909
Enlisted men of the Navy and Marine Corps, while being transported on an Army transport, shall be subject to and obey the United States Army Transport Service Regulations, and shall be liable to their proportionate share of police and guard duty whenever the commanding officer of troops on board the transport shall deem it advisable to divide those duties between the enlisted men of the Army and those of the Navy or Marine Corps on board. Enlisted men of the Navy and Marine Corps may also be called upon, but only when, in the judgment of said commanding officer, there is an emergency, to perform such duty as their special knowledge and skill may enable them to perform.
Enlisted men of the Army, while being transported on a naval vessel, shall be subject to and obey the regulations of the ship, and shall be liable to their proportionate share of police and guard duty whenever the commanding officer of the ship shall deem it advisable to divide those duties between the enlisted men of the Navy and those of the Army on board. Enlisted men of the Army may also be called upon, but only when, in the judgment of said commanding officer, there is an emergency, to perform such duties as their special knowledge and skill may enable them to perform.
All orders to enlisted men of the Navy or Marine Corps on board an Army transport, or to enlisted men of the Army on board a naval vessel, shall, as far as practicable, be given through their respective officers, noncommissioned or petty officers.
The White House
       January 7, 1909.
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Company/Dissent Douglas

* Court Documents
* Case Syllabus
* Opinion of the Court
* Dissenting Opinions Black Douglas
United States Supreme Court
344 U.S. 206
Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Company
Argued: Oct. 15 and 16, 1952. --- Decided: Dec 22, 1952
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, dissenting.
While I do not believe the merits of the case are as clear as Mr. Justice BLACK indicates, I join in the parts of his opinion which deal with the question whether the petition for certiorari was timely under 28 U.S.C. § 2101(c), 28 U.S.C.A. § 2101(c).

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.

## Dissenting Opinion

    Jackson
United States Supreme Court
334 U.S. 37
Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Company
Argued: March 10, 1948. --- Decided: May 3, 1948
[Syllabus from pages 37-39 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Robert L. Stern, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. Lloyd M. McBride, of Chicago, Ill., for respondent.
Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Trade Commission v. National Casualty Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
357 U.S. 560
Federal Trade Commission v. National Casualty Company
Argued: April 9, 10, 1958. --- Decided: June 30, 1958
[Syllabus from 560 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Ralph S. Spritzer, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. John F. Langs, Detroit, Mich., for respondent National Casualty co.
Mr. J. D. Wheeler, for respondent American Hospital and Life Ins. Co.
[Amicus Curiae from pages 560-561 intentionally omitted.]
PER CURIAM.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Trade Commission v. National Lead Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, news, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
352 U.S. 419
Federal Trade Commission v. National Lead Company
Argued: Dec. 12, 1956. --- Decided: Feb 25, 1957
Mr. Earl W. Kintner, Washington, D.C., for the petitioner.
Mr. Eugene Z. Du Bose, New York City, for the respondent.
Mr. Justice CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Federal Trade Commission v. Motion Picture Advertising Service Company

* related portals: Supreme Court of the United States.
* sister projects: Wikipedia article, Wikidata item.
United States Supreme Court
344 U.S. 392
Federal Trade Commission v. Motion Picture Advertising Service Company
Argued: Dec. 8, 1952. --- Decided: Feb 2, 1953
See 345 U.S. 914, 73 S.Ct. 638.
Mr. James L. Morrisson, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.
Mr. Louis L. Rosen, New Orleans, La., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

## Notes

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse
# Folk-lore of the Telugus/The Tiger and its Council

XXXI.
THE TIGER AND ITS COUNCIL.
At Grannavara lived a very poor Brahman, Divasarma, who eked out a livelihood as a beggar. One day, when he chanced to go to the adjacent wood for fuel for his sacrifice, he saw a huge tiger under a spreading banyan tree. Shaking with fear, he bethought him how best he could go home. There were a few lambs near the tiger at the time, who saw the shivering Brahman and that he had come in innocence of his danger; so they wished to devise means for saving him. The lambs therefore approached the tiger and said:—"O King Tiger your charity knows no bounds. Your fame extends over the four corners of the world. A Brahman has been here for a, very long time, eagerly longing to see you." The tiger thereupon was overjoyed and told the lambs to fetch the Brahman to his presence. Then the lambs went to the Brahman, told him not to be afraid, and took him along with them to the tiger. ​Whereupon the tiger was exceedingly pleased with the Brahman, and presented him with some of the ornaments of those whom he had slain on previous occasions. The Brahman thereupon was filled with joy, took the jewels home, sold some of them and lived comfortably out of the proceeds of the sale.
Some time after, a neighbouring Brahman, feeling jealous of the former's situation, thought he could also make a fortune by going to the forest, and on going there saw the tiger surrounded by a number of foxes and dogs. These animals, thinking they might share the spoil, reported the coming of the Brahman to the tiger, and had him slain.
Moral:—People will assuredly come to grief if they approach a king when he is surrounded by evil councillors.
# Folk-lore of the Telugus/The inevitability of the Law of Karma

VIII.
THE INEVITABILITY OF THE LAW OF KARMA.
There was a weaver in the Karnataka, Haimantaka by name, who wove both coarse cloth and fine linen. Bat as his profits in the calling were very meagre, he was not able to make both ends meet. Adjacent to his abode was another of the same profession, Dhimanta who lived happily on the large income he derived by weaving coarse rough fabric. Once upon a time Haimantaka approached his wife and represented his grievances to her, told her how, despite his intelligence in his art, he was not able to eke out a livelihood, and how much better placed his brother-weaver was, though weaving only a coarse stuff.
"My talents are unknown to any one in the place," said he, and determined to quit his home for another place with the object of amassing as much wealth as possible.
His wife rejoined:— "Of what avail is your going to a distant quarter? You will get only as much as it has fallen to your lot to earn." ​ Despite her remonstrances, he quit his abode, went and settled for a time in a far-off country, wove such clothes as were in consonance with the requirements of the place, made considerable money by the transaction, and wended his way home. On the way he stayed at an inn, and securing his treasure in a corner went to rest for the night. While he was enjoying 'the honey heavy dew' of slumber, thieves rushed into the inn and purloined every item of property, so that when he rose up the next morning, he found to his utter disappointment and distress that he had nothing left. He thus learnt, very dearly, indeed, the truth of his wife's statements, from the school of experience. And, feeling very despondent, lived upon such small gains as he could make at home. The moral of this is: unlucky anywhere, unlucky everywhere !
# Folk-lore of the Telugus/The Path to Fame

XXII.
THE PATH TO FAME.
King Jayathratha of Panchala had a son who was gifted with much sense from infancy. One day, beholding the king, he asked him what the sure road to reputation was. The king replied:—"When you rule the kingdom, without oppressing the people, you must find out who are rich and who are poor, and protect the latter by giving them food and clothing from time to time. Thus will you obtain an extended reputation. But, however much you may bestow on the rich, no fame will accrue to you. To give you an example, if rain falls while the crops are withering for want of water, the cloud will obtain fame, but however much it rains in the ocean, no reputation can result to the cloud." Thus speaking and considering how clever the boy was, the king made over half his kingdom to him. The youth assumed the sceptre, confirmed the leases that had been given to the people, and finding out ​the poor caused food and clothing to be given to them, and cherished them much. He thus obtained great celebrity.
# Folk-lore of the Telugus/The Swan and the Crow

XX.
THE SWAN AND THE CROW.
A crow perched on a banyan tree near the sea-shore, saw a swan passing by and asked where it was going, to which the latter replied that it was going to the Manasasaras. The crow thereupon was extremely anxious to accompany the swan, and requested the latter to take it along with it. The swan, hearing these words, said, "O crow, where is the Manasasaras and where are you ? How great is the distance between you and the saras?" The crow was very much enraged at the reply, and said, "You speak without knowing what you are about. If you examine the real truth, you will find that I can fly quicker than yourself. I will exemplify this at once—do you set out and come with me?" So saying, it soared up the skies and went a short distance along with the swan. Afterwards it flew ten yards in advance, and again coming back to the swan said jocosely. "Why, you said ​something about flying quicker than I, and yet you don't accompany me; the fact of the matter is that you, without looking into your own powers, had trifled with me." By the time that the crow had gone a little further, it became tired and unable to fly along and was in sore distress. The swan thereupon laughing placed it on its own wings and prevented it from falling into the waters below, brought it to the shore and left it there.
Thus an impotent fool, who begins by despising the strong and the good, will, in the end, come to degradation.
# Folk-lore of the Telugus/The Washerman of Benares

XIV.
THE WASHERMAN OF BENARES.
At Benares lived a washerman, who had an ass and a dog. One night some burglars made a chink in the wall, and waited till he should go to bed to break in and rob all his property. The dog was then absent from the spot; but the ass, seeing the robbers enter the master's house, divined what would happen, and how the house would be rid of all its valuables in no time, and thought that, if the dog were here, he would bark loudly, awake the master, and prevent the household property from being robbed. But he did not know when the dog would come; and thought that nobody ought to be indifferent to his master's affairs, especially in a time of sore distress. He ought, therefore, to bray and thus awake the master—so he brayed to the top of his voice. The washerman hearing the ass bray, and thinking that he was unnecessarily awakened by it, lost his temper, took a stick, ​beat it well, lay down, and was enjoying sound sleep once again, when the robbers broke in and began plundering the house. At this juncture the dog returned. The ass, seeing the dog, narrated to him what had happened; how the thieves broke into the house and earned off the greater part of the property; how he had brayed, wishing to prevent the occurrence; how it was misunderstood by their master; what a severe drubbing he had received, and so on. He requested the dog at any rate to bark and let the master know the fact. Thereupon the dog began to bark loudly. The washerman hearing it and thinking that the house was being broken open by robbers, rose immediately and searching into every corner of the house,found that the thieves had carried everything off, and was very much grieved.
Moral:—Let the shoemaker stick to his last.
# Folk-lore of the Telugus/To Escape Scot-free

XV.
TO ESCAPE SCOT-FREE.
A certain King of the Karnatak had a flower-garden, in which he spent most of his leisure hours. He had a minister, whose son was in the habit of going daily to the garden and purloining the flowers. The king, missing a number of them day after day, told the gardeners in charge to be on the alert to apprehend the rogue and bring, him before him. They accordingly kept watch, caught the minister's son red-handed, put him into a conveyance and took him to the king's palace. The minister was at the time standing at the gate. Those who were near him told him what had happened, how his son had stolen the flowers, how he was caught by the gardeners in the very act of stealing, how he was being conveyed before the king, and wanted the minister to save his son from the infamy. The minister thereupon loudly answered, "It is of no consequence, if he has a mouth, he will live." The son, hearing this, ​quickly perceived the exact import of his father's words, and immediately ate all the flowers. When they brought him before the king, he asked the boy why he had stolen the flowers. To which the boy said that they brought him there unjustly, for he only went to see the garden, but did not steal anything; As there were no flowers found upon him, the king believed this, and having punished the gardeners sent them away.
Thus, a ready person may always get him self out of a scrape.
# Folk-lore of the Telugus/The Three Fish

XXXVII.
THE THREE FISH.
Three fish lived in the bed of a river. One of these perceived that the water would dry up in the ensuing summer, informed its other companions of the same, and said, further, how they would run the risk of being carried off by the fishermen at the time, and that they should therefore seek a habitation elsewhere. It wanted, therefore, that all of them should go into the current and settle in the sea or in the bed of another river. The other two laughed at the words of their companion. The clever fish, therefore, went and settled in another quarter unaccompanied. Not long after, summer set in, and the waters of the river dried up. A fisherman threw his net into the bed, caught the two fish and put them on the bank. One of them was possessed of some sense and appeared to be dead, remaining motionless, while the other began to jump. The latter therefore was dashed to the ground ​and smashed to pieces. The former, perceiving the fisherman going away with his net, crawled unperceived and jumped into the waters and lived comfortably.
Moral:—Whoever perceives coming events and tries to avert danger shall surely be happy; and the person who tries to extricate himself from difficulties, even after they happen, may also consider himself lucky, but the man who remains idle will surely come to grief.
# Folk-lore of the Telugus/The Washerman Minister

IX.
THE WASHERMAN MINISTER.
The King of Kalinga had a washerman who used to wash his cloths exceedingly well and bring and give them to Trim daily. One day, the king was exceedingly pleased with the scrupulously clean manner in which the clothes were brought to him and promised the washerman to grant any one prayer he might make. The washerman looked at the king and said that he was most anxious to become the king's minister, and requested the king to bestow the post on him. The king did so, dispensing with the services of his old minister, who had served him for a very long time.
It came to pass that, not long afterwards, a certain other king having heard of the weakness of the washerman minister, raised a huge army and gave battle. His master having heard of what had come to pass, called upon the new minister to muster his forces, to which he replied that as he had already made the ​necessary preparations, there was no cause to fear the enemy. The king fully believed in this statement, but was sorely disappointed, for not long afterwards the city was bombarded by the hostile armies. The king sent at once to the minister, told him of what had happened and enquired of him as to the arrangements he had made.
The minister responded:—"There is nothing to fear in what has come to pass. But I find that the task of ruling a kingdom is a big affair, and while I was thinking of how best to rid ourselves of this difficulty, the enemy chanced to enter and blockade the city. Let them, therefore, undergo the perils of governing the kingdom. As for me, I used to wash the cloths of about a hundred families in this city but since my elevation to the ministership I have had to give up my calling. I will now' therefore, resume it, and give you one-half the work and reserve the other half for myself; the calling being no trouble to me. On these considerations I have made no preparations for war." ​ The king was very much grieved when he heard this, but thought the result to be the natural punishment of linking himself to a fool.
# Folk-lore of the Telugus/The Sagacious Minister

V.
THE SAGACIOUS MINISTER.
Sultan Mahmud* used to wage war on foreign countries and to oppress his people at home. His whole dominions lay consequently desolate. Upon this his minister thought that it was imperative to contrive some stratagem by which the king would turn out a good ruler. Accordingly, whenever he spoke to the king he used to relate how he had once been a pupil of a certain Sannyasin and had learnt the language of birds.
One day, as the king and the minister were returning from the hunt, two owls were sitting screaming upon a tree by the road-side. The king, hearing the noises, called upon his minister to tell him what the birds were conversing about. The premier listened for a short time, as though he really understood the conversation, and then ​told the king that they were not words fit for him to hear. The king, however, insisted upon hearing the words.
The vizier, therefore, represented the conversation to be as follows:—"One of the owls had a son and the other a daughter, and the two parent-birds are negotiating a marriage between their children. The former parent said to the latter:—'Then, you will give your daughter to my son, but will you give him fifty ruined villages'? To which the latter parent replied:— 'While our Sultan Mahmud by the grace of the Almighty rules so happily, can there be a dearth of ruined villages? You only asked me for a paltry fifty, I will give you five hundred."
When the Sultan heard this, he was very much grieved at heart. So he at once ordered the rebuilding of all the ruined villages in the realm, and made his subjects happy and prosperous.