# Economy of the Mughal Empire

The economy in the Indian Subcontinent during the Mughal Empire era performed just as it did in ancient times, though now it would face the stress of extensive regional tensions.

## Quotes

* May 12th, on Saturday the 29th of Rajab the examination and distribution of the treasure were begun. To Humāyūn were given 70 lakhs from the Treasury, and, over and above this, a treasure house was bestowed on him just as it was, without ascertaining and writing down its contents. To some begs 10 lakhs were given, 8, 7, or 6 to others. Suitable money-gifts were bestowed from the Treasury on the whole army, to every tribe there was, Afghān, Hazāra, ‘Arab, Bīlūch, etc. to each according to its position. Every trader and student, indeed every man who had come with the army, took ample portion and share of bounteous gift and largess. To those not with the army went a mass of treasure in gift and largess, as for instance, 17 lakhs to Kāmran, 15 lakhs to Muḥammad-i-zamān Mīrzā, while to ‘Askarī, Hindāl and indeed to the whole various train of relations and younger children went masses of red and white (gold and silver), of plenishing, jewels, and slaves. Many gifts went to the begs and soldiery on that side (Tramontana). Valuable gifts (saughāt) were sent for the various relations in Samarkand, Khurāsān, Kāshghar and ‘Irāq. To holy men belonging to Samarkand and Khurāsān went offerings vowed to God (nuẕūr); so too to Makka and Madīna. We gave one shāhrukhi for every soul in the country of Kābul and the valley-side of Varsak, man and woman, bond and free, of age or non-age.
** Ghāzī, ahiru’d-dīn Muḥammad Bābur Pādshāh, The Babur-nama in English (Memoirs of Babur), translated from the original Turki Text of ahiru’d-dīn Muḥammad Bābur Pādshāh Ghāzī. (ed.) Annette Susannah Beveridge. (trans.) Annette Susannah Beveridge. London: Luzac and Co, 1922. pp. 522-525.
* When I knew of this unsteadiness amongst (my) people, I summoned all the begs and took counsel. Said I, “There is no supremacy and grip on the world without means and resources; without lands and retainers’ sovereignty and command (Padishahlīq u amīrlīq) are impossible. By the labors of several years, by encountering hardship, by long travel, by flinging myself and the army into battle, and by deadly slaughter, we, through Allah’s grace, beat these masses of enemies so that we might take their broad lands. And now what force compels us, what necessity has arisen that we should, without cause, abandon countries taken at such risk of life? Was it for us to remain in Kābul, the sport of harsh poverty? Henceforth, let no well-wisher of mine speak of such things! But let not those turn back from going who, weak in strong persistence, have set their faces to depart!” By these words, which recalled just and reasonable views to their minds, I made them, willy-nilly, quit their fears.
** Ghāzī, ahiru’d-dīn Muḥammad Bābur Pādshāh, The Babur-nama in English (Memoirs of Babur), translated from the original Turki Text of ahiru’d-dīn Muḥammad Bābur Pādshāh Ghāzī. (ed.) Annette Susannah Beveridge. (trans.) Annette Susannah Beveridge. London: Luzac and Co, 1922. pp. 522-525.
* There was no middle state. A man must be of the highest rank or live miserably.
** François Bernier. Travels in the Mogul Empire. Quoted from Lal, K. S. (1992). The legacy of Muslim rule in India. New Delhi: Aditya Prakashan. Chapter 6
* Most towns in Hindustan are made up of earth, mud, and other wretched material; that there is no city or town (that) does not bear evident marks of approaching decay. (...) In eastern countries, the weak and the injured are without any refuge whatever; and the only law that decides all controversies is the cane and the caprice of a governor.
** François Bernier. Travels in the Mogul Empire. Quoted from Lal, K. S. (1992). The legacy of Muslim rule in India. New Delhi: Aditya Prakashan.
* As the ground is seldom tilled otherwise than by compulsion… the whole country is badly cultivated, and a great part rendered unproductive… The peasant cannot avoid asking himself this question: Why should I toil for a tyrant who may come tomorrow and lay his rapacious hands upon all I possess and value… without leaving me the means (even) to drag my own miserable existence? - The Timariots (Timurids), Governors and Revenue contractors, on their part reason in this manner: Why should the neglected state of this land create uneasiness in our minds, and why should we expend our own money and time to render it fruitful? We may be deprived of it in a single moment… Let us draw from the soil all the money we can, though the peasant should starve or abscond…
** François Bernier. Travels in the Mogul Empire. Quoted from Lal, K. S. (1992). The legacy of Muslim rule in India. New Delhi: Aditya Prakashan.
* [The Mughals maintained] “a large army for the purpose of keeping people in subjection… No adequate idea can be conveyed of the sufferings of the people. The cudgel and the whip compel them to incessant labour… their revolt or their flight is only prevented by the presence of a military force.”
** François Bernier. Travels in the Mogul Empire. Quoted from Lal, K. S. (1992). The legacy of Muslim rule in India. New Delhi: Aditya Prakashan. Chapter 4
* No artisan can be expected to give his mind to his calling in the midst of a people who are either wretchedly poor, or who, if rich, assume an appearance of poverty, and who regard not the beauty and excellence but the cheapness of an article; a people whose grandeess pay for a work of art considerably under its value and according to their own caprice… For it should not be inferred that the workman is held in esteem, or arrives at a stage of independence. Nothing but sheer necessity or blows from a cudgel keeps him employed; he never can become rich, and he feels it no trifling matter if he have the means of satisfying the cravings of hunger and of covering his body with the coarsest garment. If money be gained it does not in any measure go into his pocket, but only serves to increase the wealth of the merchant.
** François Bernier. Travels in the Mogul Empire. Quoted from Lal, K. S. (1992). The legacy of Muslim rule in India. New Delhi: Aditya Prakashan.
* …grandees pay for a work of art considerably under its value, and according to their own caprice. … When an Omrah or Mansabdar requires the services of an artisan, he sends to the bazar for him, employing force, if necessary, to make the poor man work; and after the task is finished, the unfeeling lord pays, not according to the value- of the labour, but agreeably to his own standard of fair remuneration; the artisan having reason to congratulate himself if the Korrah has not been given in part payment.
** François Bernier, quoted from Lal, K. S. (1992). The legacy of Muslim rule in India. New Delhi: Aditya Prakashan. Chapter 7
* Gold and silver are not in greater plenty here than elsewhere; on the contrary, the inhabitants have less the appearance of a moneyed people than those of many other parts of the globe.
** François Bernier, Travels in the Mogul Empire, AD 1656–1668, (ed.) Archibald Constable and Vincent A Smith, (trans.) Archibald Constable, London, Edinburgh, Glasgow, New York, Toronto, Melbourne, Bombay: Humphrey Milford, Oxford University Press, 1891. pp. 223 in Aabhas Maldahiyar - Babur_ The Chessboard King-Vintage Books (2024)
* Labourers perish due to bad treatment from Governors. Children of poor are carried away as slaves. Peasantry abandon the country driven by despair. As the land throughout the whole empire is considered the property of the sovereign, there can be no earldoms, marquisates, or duchies. The royal grants consist only of pensions, either in land or money, which the king gives, augments, retrenches or takes away at pleasure. The artisans who manufactured the luxury goods for the Mughal aristocracy were almost always on starvation wages.
** François Bernier, Travels in the Mogul Empire, AD 1656–1668, (ed.) Archibald Constable and Vincent A Smith, (trans.) Archibald Constable, London, Edinburgh, Glasgow, New York, Toronto, Melbourne, Bombay: Humphrey Milford, Oxford University Press, 1891. pp. 205 in Aabhas Maldahiyar - Babur_ The Chessboard King-Vintage Books (2024)
* Of the vast tracts of country constituting the empire of Hindoustan, many are little more than sand, or barren mountains, badly cultivated and thinly peopled; and even a considerable portion of the good land remains untilled from want of labourers; many of whom perish in consequence of the bad treatment they experience from the Governors. These poor people, when incapable of discharging the demands of their rapacious lords, are not only often deprived of the means of subsistence, but are bereft of their children, who are carried away as slaves. Thus it happens that many of the peasantry, driven to despair by so execrable a tyranny, abandon the country, and seek a more tolerable mode of existence, either in the towns, or camps; as bearers of burdens, carriers of water, or servants to horsemen. Sometimes they fly to the territories of a Raja, because there they find less oppression, and are allowed a greater degree of comfort.
** François Bernier, Travels in the Mogul Empire, AD 1656–1668, (ed.) Archibald Constable and Vincent A Smith, (trans.) Archibald Constable, London, Edinburgh, Glasgow, New York, Toronto, Melbourne, Bombay: Humphrey Milford, Oxford University Press, 1891. in Aabhas Maldahiyar - Babur_ The Chessboard King-Vintage Books (2024)
* During the reign of my father, the ministers of religion and students of law and literature, to the number of two and three thousand, in the principal cities of the empire, were already allowed pensions from the state; and to these, in conformity with the regulations established by my father, I directed Miran Sadr Jahan one of the noblest among the Seyeds of Herat, to allot a subsistence corresponding with their situation; and this is not only to the subjects of my own realms, but to foreigners – to natives of Persia, Roum, Bokhara, and Azerbaijan, with strict charge that this class of men should not be permitted either want or inconvenience of any type.
** Jahangir, Tarikh-i Salim Shahi, s.l.: Sushil Gupta, 1952. in Aabhas Maldahiyar - Babur_ The Chessboard King-Vintage Books (2024)
* His policy was to dazzle the eyes of these princes by lavish gift of presents to them and to their envoys, and thus induce the outer Muslim world to forget his treatment of his father and brothers. The fame of India as a soft milch cow spread throughout the middle and near East, and the minor embassies were merely begging expeditions.
** About Aurangzeb. Lt Colonel Sir Wolseley Haig, The Cambridge History of India, (ed.) Sir Richard Burn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1937. Vol. IV, p. 229 in Aabhas Maldahiyar - Babur_ The Chessboard King-Vintage Books (2024)
* ‘As far as the economy was concerned, the Moghūl state apparatus was parasitic.’ According to him, the state was a regime of warlord predators which was lesser efficient than European feudalism. He further writes, ‘The Moghūl state and aristocracy put their income were largely unproductive. Their investments were made in two main forms: hoarding precious metals and jewels.’
** Angus Maddison, The World Economy, A Millenial Perspective. s.l.: OECD. p. 109. in Aabhas Maldahiyar - Babur_ The Chessboard King-Vintage Books (2024)
* The Mughal dynasty’s wealth and power was based upon its ability to tap directly into the agrarian productivity of the Indian sub-continent. Trade, manufacture and other taxes were much less important to the imperial revenues than agriculture, most estimates putting them at less than 10% of the total.
** J.F.Richards, Fiscal States in Mughal and British India, Francisco Comín Comín, (ed.) Francisco Comín Comín, Patrick K. O’Brien Bartolomé Yun-Casalilla, The Rise of Fiscal States, A Global History, 1500–1914, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo, Delhi, Mexico City: Cambridge University Press, 2012, 17, p. 410. in Aabhas Maldahiyar - Babur_ The Chessboard King-Vintage Books (2024)
* The Mughal state was an insatiable Leviathan.
** Tapan Raychaudhuri, The State and the Economy, The Mughal Empire; (ed.) Irfan Habib Tapan Raychaudhuri, The Cambridge Economic History of India, Cambridge, New York, New Rochelle, Melbourne, Sydney: Cambridge University Press, 1987, Vol. 1, VII.1, p. 173. in Aabhas Maldahiyar - Babur_ The Chessboard King-Vintage Books (2024)