# Stephanie Zacharek

Stephanie Zacharek (born 13. August 1963) is an American film and music critic. She is the film critic at Time magazine, based in New York City. From 2013 to 2015 she was the principal film critic for The Village Voice.

## Quotes

* Women's desire is a mysterious, feral thing, and if you think you've got it figured out because you've looked at a few Georgia O'Keeffe paintings, you're not even close.
** "Fifty Shades Freed Is a Pleasure. Just Don’t Call It a Guilty One". Time.com. 2018-02-09. Retrieved on 2018-02-09.
* We've moved away from being a culture of people who think about movies to one made up of people who believe that spouting a list of preferences is the same as registering an opinion.
** "Unintelligent Agent". Salon.com. 1997-01-17. Retrieved on 2006-08-25.
* You can talk film theory till you're blue in the face, but in the end, the thing that may haunt you most about a movie is a pair of eyes.
** "Seduced and Abandoned". Salon.com. 1997-05-09. Retrieved on 2006-08-25.
* Everything about Pee-Wee's Big Adventure, from its toy-box colors to its superb, hyper-animated Danny Elfman score to the butch-waxed hairdo and wooden-puppet walk of its star and mastermind is pure pleasure.
** Review of Pee-Wee's Big Adventure (1985)
* It would be destined for the trash heap of Shakespeare adaptations, if not for its female lead, and its heart, 17-year-old Claire Danes.
** Review of William Shakespeare's Romeo + Juliet (1996)
* [Director James] Cameron manhandles the real story, scavenging it for his own puny narrative purposes. It's a film made with boorish confidence and zero sensitivity, big and dumb and hulking.
** Review of Titanic (1997)
* It's mournful and troubling in a way that goes beyond ordinary movie manipulation. It burns clean.
** Review of Cast Away (2000)
* It's a movie barely fit for a cretin, much less a King. ... If you hear a door slam in the theater, you'll know that Elvis has left the building -- in disgust.
** Review of 3000 Miles to Graceland (2001)
* Who would have thought that [director] Cameron Crowe had a movie as bad as Vanilla Sky in him? It's a punishing picture, a betrayal of everything that Crowe has proved he knows how to do right.
** Review of Vanilla Sky (2001)
* I can't remember ever feeling so glad that a movie was finally over. [Director George] Lucas may have held my imagination hostage for two hours, but reclaiming it afterward wasn't hard at all.
** Review of Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones (2002)
* Monster is a compassionate picture without any obvious agenda. And it's effective precisely because it's not a polemic.
** Review of Monster (2003)
* Oldboy makes us feel a part of something bigger than ourselves. It's a grand, gritty, indelible experience, the sort of picture that mimics great literature in the way it envelops you in a well-told story while also evoking subtle but strong gradations of emotion.
** Review of Oldboy (2003)
* This film Phantom takes everything that's wrong with Broadway and puts it on the big screen in a gaudy splat.
** Review of Andrew Lloyd Webber's The Phantom of the Opera (2004)
* While 9 Songs is sexually explicit in the basic sense, its directness is what's most fascinating, and ultimately most moving, about it.
** Review of 9 Songs (2005)
* Batman Begins leaks existential phoniness from the first frame.
** Review of Batman Begins (2005)
* I suspect this picture is pretty close to what fans were hoping for, and for their sake, I'm glad it's markedly better than the two that preceded it. But Revenge of the Sith is still crap.
** Review of Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith (2005)
* Extravagant in movie terms but stingy in emotional ones, it embodies all of [director Steven] Spielberg's bad impulses and almost none of his good ones: It's a grand display of how well he knows how to work us over, and yet the desperation with which he tries to get to us is repulsive.
** Review of War of the Worlds (2005)
* This is a sturdy little cop thriller, and even when it stretches the bounds of plausibility, you go with it, partly because you believe -- almost against your better judgment -- in what the characters are doing.
** Review of 16 Blocks (2006)
* Children of Men is a solemn, haunting picture, but it's also a thrilling one, partly because of the sheer bravado with which it's made. It left me feeling more fortified than drained. [Director Alfonso] Cuarón, the most openhearted of directors, prefers to give rather than take away.
** Review of Children of Men (2006)
* [I]t's guilty of the very thing that makes kids hate history as a subject when it's taught badly: The Da Vinci Code makes the past feel like a dull, grainy, faraway thing, instead of something vibrant and alive.
** Review of The Da Vinci Code (2006)
* Pan's Labyrinth works on so many levels that it seems to change shape even as you watch it. It is, at times, a joyless picture, and its pall of sadness can begin to weigh you down.
** Review of Pan's Labyrinth (2006)
* The bigger question to ask about 300 is why, for a supposedly rousing tale of heroism, it's so curiously unaffecting.
** Review of 300 (2007)
* The scariest thing in it may be the way the clock radio has a way of turning itself on, loudly, of its own accord. The song is always the Carpenters' "We've Only Just Begun." Now that's horror.
** Review of 1408 (2007)
* The most interesting character here is an animal, a sturdy-looking white and black bulldog, who appears throughout the movie, angel style, to speak the truth -- silently. In this load of mind-bendy bushwa, he's the only thing worth watching, or listening to.
** Review of The Number 23 (2007)
* There are epic impulses everywhere you look in There Will Be Blood; what's missing is character development, focused storytelling and, most significantly (apart from that terrific opening sequence), any sense of raw, intuitive drama.
** Review of There Will Be Blood (2007)
* This sprawling epic is as lively as a natural history museum diorama.
** Review of 10,000 BC (2008)
* [I]t pretends to examine how self-absorbed we are as a culture, only to be consumed by its own self-absorption. It's also badly constructed, humorless and emotionally sadistic.
** Review of Cloverfield (2008)
* [Director Christopher] Nolan ... gives us enough multilayered subplots to at least fool us into thinking this is a work of intellectual and moral complexity. But as a piece of visual storytelling, from shot to shot, The Dark Knight is a mess. Characters disappear from one locale and show up inexplicably in another, thanks to the magic of editing. At one point, we learn two characters have been abducted, but Nolan doesn't bother to show us who did it or how. (Later, he explains the "who did it" with dialogue -- the lazy way.) At the end, a major character is left hanging, literally, as we are figuratively. If this is genius, give me hackery.
** Review of The Dark Knight (2008)
* It's impossible to tell what's going on at any given moment in Tomb of the Dragon Emperor; it's even harder to care about being able to tell.
** Review of The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor (2008)
* This isn't a picture filled with wonder and a sense of fun; it's so jaded and crass that I almost wonder if it's a highly unscientific experiment designed to gauge how little audiences will settle for these days. Manic and multicolored, Speed Racer is an excess of nothingness.
** Review of Speed Racer (2008)
* Despite the bare butts and crude sex jokes -- or because of them -- this Adam Sandler vehicle addresses some of the biggest political problems of our time. ... At the very least, it's got to be the first picture to use smelly-feet jokes as a means of parsing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But more than that, it's a mainstream movie that dares to make jokes about the kinds of complex political realities that most of us don't dare bring up at dinner parties.
** Review of You Don't Mess with the Zohan (2008)
* It's time to start recognizing that not all escapist entertainment is created equal. And that some of it isn't even entertainment. Miss March is, to use the vernacular of the escapist moviegoer, the biggest pile of crap I've seen in ages.
** Review of Miss March (2009)
* It's possible [director Jody] Hill has a style, of sorts. But he doesn't work from the heart, or from the gut, as a good comedy director generally needs to. He operates from one guiding question: "How disturbing can we make this shit?"
** Review of Observe and Report (2009)