# Neethi Padmanabhan

Neethi Padmanabhan is a Senior Lecturer at the School of Development, Azim Premji University, Bangalore, India.

## Quotes

* Questioning global stereotypes on economic responses to globalisation, I argue that labour becomes actively involved in the very process of globalisation and the expansion of capital. [...] Although it would seem a simple proposition to suggest that working class people and their organisations affect the ways in which the landscapes of capitalism are made, until recently, there has been little work, even within economic geography, addressing this issue.
** Globalisation Lived Locally: A Labour Geography Perspective on Control, Conflict and Response among Workers in Kerala, 2012, at ResearchGate
* Low labour cost, along with ﬂexibility in labour use, has become a key source of competitive advantage for ﬁrms. As external competition intensiﬁes, the domestic industry has come under great pressure to restructure itself, to become more competitive and to adopt ﬂexible policies with regard to production and labour. With a view to increasing global competitiveness, investors are moving more towards countries that either have low labour costs, or are shifting to informal employment arrangements. These changes create an entirely different political-economic environment for workers around the world. Greater international mobility of capital relative to labour puts workers from a given location at an immediate disadvantage, both in terms of bargaining power with the owners of capital (whose threat to move gains greater credibility) and with respect to the State. Thus the removal of domestic entry barriers and movement of capital to areas of cheap labour have caused intensiﬁcation of domestic competition in many developing countries— especially those with surplus labour supply and those where labour is a major factor of production. This has been accentuated by potential investors citing the lack of ﬂexibility in hiring and laying off workers as a concern, while targeting a developing country in which to invest.
** Globalisation Lived Locally: A Labour Geography Perspective on Control, Conflict and Response among Workers in Kerala, 2012, at ResearchGate
* Optimism with regard to labour as an agency of social progress has been replaced by pessimism that sees little prospect of workers acting on their own behalf.
** Globalisation Lived Locally: A Labour Geography Perspective on Control, Conflict and Response among Workers in Kerala, 2012, at ResearchGate
* Trade unions do not consider workers from smaller units as workers in the formal sense, or they often cannot access workers inside special industrial zones, behind walls of security. Workers too sometimes do not accept the unions even as they find themselves vulnerable. But if they find their existence is under threat, they will come out and protest. [...] Workers' issues get space if things turn violent. Here, for instance, if the women workers had simply come out of the factories and sat on a dharna, they would not have got so much television coverage.
** On the Bengaluru protests of 2016, as quoted in Bengaluru protests represent a new wave of militant worker expression, say union leaders (April 22, 2016) by Anumeha Yadav, Scroll.in
* On November 20, the Karnataka government issued a notification allowing women to work night shifts (7 p.m. to 6 a.m.) in all factories registered under the Factories Act, 1948. [...] In principle, this is a welcome move. However, several concerns have been voiced by women garment workers who are estimated to constitute over 90% of the five lakh garment workers in Karnataka (according to data by Asia Floor Wage Alliance, a global coalition of trade unions). The amendment suggests that night shifts for women will only be allowed if the employer ensures adequate safeguards concerning occupational safety and health, protection of dignity and honour, and transportation from the factory premises to points nearest to the worker’s residence. The amendment stipulates 24 points related to occupational rules and regulations, most of which have been in existence for years. Yet, women workers fear that when there is no safety or dignity in the workplace even during daytime, how will employers ensure all this during night shifts?
** New rules, old problems (December 25, 2019), co-written with Nandita Shivakumar, The Hindu
* In a sector where there is systemic failure and worker-management relations are turbulent, putting the onus of worker safety and security in the hands of the management alone can be risky. Moreover, it is well-known that in supply chains the brands call the shots. Involving them in discussions on worker dignity and equality is important. Omitting workers and trade unions from discussions about the amendment is also seen by the workers as a short-sighted measure. Women garment workers are concerned that while the amendment has stipulated many ‘new’ guidelines amidst the plethora of unaddressed concerns, allowing night shifts would only extend daytime exploitation.
** New rules, old problems (December 25, 2019), co-written with Nandita Shivakumar, The Hindu
* Clearly, the disparity between the prospects of win-alls and lose-alls maps perfectly with their respective general socio-economic conditions as determined by class, caste and gender identities. The current pandemic can significantly worsen the existing and expanding inequalities in Indian economy and society. Inequalities of health, income and employment even within the informal workforce can expand, with some informal workers at lower risk and others at higher on the three counts. This is as much a socio-economic inequality issue as much as a public health dilemma. After the dust settles and restrictions are relaxed, the win-alls as well as others lying towards the more privileged end of the means spectrum should be able to hop straight back to their routines with their health, wealth and job security intact. The lose-alls and those proximate to that extreme will be more susceptible to illnesses, loss of income and job insecurity – and quite likely all three together. The latter group is trapped in an adverse equilibrium with the unjust choices of risking their health if they go to work, risking their income if they don’t go to work, and risking their employment if the COVID-19 lockdown continues.
** How the Coronavirus Outbreak Is Also a Socio-Economic Inequality Issue, 23 March 2020, co-written with Anant Kamath, The Wire
* Today, a pandemic. Tomorrow, a natural disaster, a chemical spill or some socio-political unrest. There’s always some disruption around the corner. So for as long as informal jobs are the norm in our economy and as long as we cannot practically lockdown the entire country, the way ahead is to install measures to improve social security. State and society cannot throw up their hands in helplessness or stay blind to variations in vulnerability among informal workers. It must facilitate structural changes through dialogues in policy, academia and other spheres. There is no single solution, especially not just direct monetary transfers. [...] The government’s advisories about restricting social contact are indeed important but such measures are economically risky for so many who face a choice between the devil and the deep-sea. Social distancing is impractical for the tens of millions without social security.
** How the Coronavirus Outbreak Is Also a Socio-Economic Inequality Issue, 23 March 2020, co-written with Anant Kamath, The Wire

## External links

* Neethi Padmanabhan's profile at Indian Institute for Human Settlements
* Neethi Padmanabhan at Google Scholar
* Neethi Padmanabhan at ResearchGate
* Neethi Padmanabhan at Academia.edu
* George, Sobin; Sinha, Shalini (2017). Redefined Labour Spaces: Organising Workers in Post-Liberalised India. Taylor & Francis. p. 70. ISBN 978-1-351-60248-8.
* Nowak, Jörg (2019). Mass Strikes and Social Movements in Brazil and India: Popular Mobilisation in the Long Depression. Springer Publishing. p. 74. ISBN 978-3-030-05375-8.
* Dey, Ishita (1 December 2018)"P. Neethi: Globalization Lived Locally. A Labour Geography Perspective". The Indian Journal of Labour Economics 61 (4): 719–720. ISSN 0019-5308. DOI:10.1007/s41027-018-0147-y.
* Sodhi, J.S. (2016)"Review of Globalization Lived Locally-A Labor Geography Perspective". Indian Journal of Industrial Relations 52 (2): 350–352. ISSN 0019-5286.
* Dutta, Madhumita (30 January 2020)"Review of: Neethi P. (2016) Globalization Lived Locally: A Labour Geography Perspective". Global Labour Journal 11 (1). DOI:10.15173/glj.v11i1.4189.
* Cumbers, Andrew; Featherstone, David; MacKinnon, Danny; Ince, Anthony; Strauss, Kendra (January 2016)"Intervening in globalization: the spatial possibilities and institutional barriers to labour’s collective agency". Journal of Economic Geography 16 (1): 93–108. DOI:10.1093/jeg/lbu039.
* 'Treat Sanitation Workers Like Health Workers, Pay Them At Least Rs 20,000 Per Month', 22 April 2020, The Wire
* Authority control: WorldCat search