# Critique of the 1776 Commission Report/Guide for Contributors/Style Guide
## History Content Analysis

Classification Labels
* Error
* Omission
* Exaggeration
* Understatement
* Misstatement
* Faulty Analysis

## Memory Content Analysis

Classification Labels
* Error
* Omission
* Exaggeration
* Understatement
* Misstatement
* Faulty Analysis

## Rhetoric Analysis

The goal of rhetorical analysis is primarily to classify and label the rhetoric in the original text, and not to identify or correct errors, omissions, or flaws in the author's rhetoric. The only exception to this is labeling Flaws in Reasoning or Logic (see below).
Rhetorical classification has the following structure:
* Rhetorical Goal & Pattern
* Rhetorical Strategy
* Reasoning and Informal Logic
** Forms
** Statements about Evidence
** Flaws in Reasoning and Logic
** Statements about Truth and Knowledge (Epistemology)
Any given paragraph or section in the original text will have two or three types of labels: 1) a Rhetorical Goal or Pattern, 2) a Rhetorical Strategy, and (optional) 3) Reasoning and Informal Logic -- if that paragraph or section has a goal of being persuasive through reasoning or argument.
       Note: Any paragraph where this doesn't apply should not have any Rhetoric Analysis. Hypothetical example: "The authors on this project really enjoyed the process of writing and editing this report." This statement would outside the scope of the this book, and therefore should not have any Rhetoric labels or tags.
To this end, a fairly elaborate system of classifications and labels are provided below. Contributors can use Templates for each, as shown in the "What you type" column.
When you enter your analysis of Rhetoric for each paragraph in the original, use the non-verbose template in the "Summary" while the verbose template should be used in your explanatory paragraph(s).
[TODO: Add example ]

### Goal & Pattern

Rhetorical Goal & Pattern :
| Class | Definition | What you type | What you see |
| Persuasion (or Argument) | Series of statements aimed to convince the reader of the rightness or correctness of the author's claims, assertions, evaluations, or conclusions | {{persuasion | First few words ... }} {{persuasion | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Persuasion - [hover mouse for tooltip] Template:Persuasion |
| Framing | Defining the scope of argument or debate, defining what is or is not important, defining the criteria for evaluating arguments, or defining whose viewpoint matters | {{label1 | First few words ... }} {{label1 | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Label1 - [hover mouse for tooltip] Template:Label1 |
| Narration | [description] | {{label1 | First few words ... }} {{label1 | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Label1 - [hover mouse for tooltip] Template:Label1 |
| Description | [description] | {{label1 | First few words ... }} {{label1 | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Label1 - [hover mouse for tooltip] Template:Label1 |
| Process | [description] | {{label1 | First few words of ... }} {{label1 | First few words ... | verbose}} | Template:Label1 - [hover mouse for tooltip] Template:Label1 |
| Exemplification | [description] | {{label1 | First few words ... }} {{label1 | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Label1 - [hover mouse for tooltip] Template:Label1 |
| Abstraction | To assign phenomena or claims to a general or abstract frame or system of knowledge, in order to make sense of it or highlight what is important in the general case or bigger picture. | {{label1 | First few words ... }} {{label1 | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Label1 - [hover mouse for tooltip] Template:Label1 |
| Classification | [description] | {{label1 | First few words ... }} {{label1 | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Label1 - [hover mouse for tooltip] Template:Label1 |
| Comparison and Contrast | [description] | {{label1 | First few words ... }} {{label1 | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Label1 - [hover mouse for tooltip] Template:Label1 |

### Strategy

Rhetorical Strategy :
| Class | Definition | What you type | What you see |
| Reasoning | A statement of claims followed by reasoning/logic and evidence to support those claims, and perhaps comment on counter-arguments or objections. Often presents and analyzes objective facts or data, often by means of explaining causes and effects. Aristotle called it logos. | {{reasoning | First few words ... }} {{reasoning | First few words ...| verbose}} | Reasoning - [hover mouse for tooltip] Strategy - Reasoning: " First few words ... " |
| Authority | Asserting authority, credentials, reputation, or credibility, either for the author or people being quoted or cited. Aristotle grouped this under ethos. | {{authority | First few words ... }} {{authority | First few words ...| verbose}} | Authority - [hover mouse for tooltip] Strategy - Authority: " First few words ... " |
| Values | Asserting moral or ethical values, or justifying a claim based on moral or ethical values. Aristotle grouped this under ethos. | {{values | First few words ... }} {{values | First few words ...| verbose}} | Values - [hover mouse for tooltip] Strategy - Values: " First few words ... " |
| Emotional Appeal | An appeal to emotions or passions. Aristotle called this pathos. | {{emotional appeal | First few words of emotional appeal... }} {{emotional appeal | First few words ...| verbose}} | Emotional Appeal - [hover mouse for tooltip] Strategy - Emotional Appeal: " First few words ... " |
| Affiliation Appeal | An appeal to group or class affiliation. Example: "Every military combat veteran knows that war is not romantic and noble". The group is "military combat veterans", and the claim is "war is not romantic and noble". The implication of this appeal is that people in that group or class would have experiences that lead them to believe this claim. | {{affiliation | First few words ... }} {{affiliation | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Affiliation - [hover mouse for tooltip] Template:Affiliation |

### Forms of Reasoning and Informal Logic

Forms of Reasoning and Informal Logic :
| Class | Definition | What you type | What you see |
| Induction | description | {{label1 | First few words ... }} {{label1 | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Label1 - [hover mouse for tooltip] Template:Label1 |
| Deduction | description | {{label1 | First few words ... }} {{label1 | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Label1 - [hover mouse for tooltip] Template:Label1 |
| Cause and Effect | description | {{label1 | First few words ... }} {{label1 | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Label1 - [hover mouse for tooltip] Template:Label1 |
| label1 | description | {{label1 | First few words ... }} {{label1 | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Label1 - [hover mouse for tooltip] Template:Label1 |
| label1 | description | {{label1 | First few words ... }} {{label1 | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Label1 - [hover mouse for tooltip] Template:Label1 |

### Statements about Evidence

Statements about Evidence :
| Class | Definition | What you type | What you see |

### Flaws in Reasoning or Logic

Flaws in Reasoning or Logic :
| Class | Definition | What you type | What you see |

### Statements About Truth and Knowledge (Epistemology)

Epistemology is a very big topic in philosophy and we aren't doing full analysis in this book. For purposes of rhetoric analysis, we are only concerned with labeling the original text when it includes explicit and specific statements about truth and knowledge. Examples: "Everybody knows...", "Nobody will ever know...", "People who have lived and worked on farms will know...", "It is a universal truth that...", "As humans, we must believe [i.e. have faith that]...", "As revealed to us by our Creator...", and so on.
For our purposes, "truth" includes two definitions/categories: "justifiable true belief" (factual or realist truth) and also "beliefs one is willing to act on, in the court of one's highest interests" (pragmatist truth). This includes "sincere truths" and excludes so-called "truths" that are ironic, satiric, for-the-sake-of-argument, deceitful, or aimed to defeat or undermine the process of argumentation or debate itself. These latter statements have an underlying truth that is at odds with their face value or meaning. The implication of these two definitions of "truth" is that we assume the authors of the original text are trying — in good faith — to convince the reader to take meaningful action in the world, and not merely to entertain, stimulate imagination, provoke controversy, for literary or aesthetic effect, or to subvert debate or action.
Statements About Truth and Knowledge (Epistemology) :
| Class | Definition | What you type | What you see |
| Given | Asserting something is true because it is given, necessarily true, self-evidently true, axiomatic, undisputed or unquestionably true, etc. | {{given | First few words of self-evident truths... }} {{given | First few words of ...| verbose}} | Template:Given - [hover mouse for tooltip] Template:Given |
| Assumption | Asserting something is assumed to be true, including for the sake of argument | {{assumption | First few words ... }} {{assumption | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Assumption Template:Assumption |
| Unknowable | Asserting something is cannot be known, and thus is beyond the reach of reasoning, evidence, etc. | {{unknowable | First few words ... }} {{unknowable | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Unknowable Template:Unknowable |
| Faith | Asserting something can only be known through faith, i.e. "a light within", as in "...a leap of faith" and "...beyond reason". | {{faith | First few words ... }} {{faith | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Faith Template:Faith |
| Intuition | Asserting something is known through intuition -- presumably an intuition developed and refined by experience in the world -- and not through any explicit reasoning process. | {{intuition | First few words ... }} {{intuition | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Intuition Template:Intuition |
| Unsolved | Asserting something is as yet an unsolved puzzle or mystery or problem. Does not apply to debates and matters of agreement. | {{unsolved | First few words ... }} {{unsolved | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Unsolved Template:Unsolved |
| Contested | Asserting something is a matter of unresolved debate among people with well-founded arguments. | {{contested | First few words ... }} {{contested | First few words ...| verbose}} | Template:Contested Template:Contested |

## Viewpoints Analysis

When you enter your analysis of Viewpoints for each paragraph in the original, use the non-verbose template in the "Summary" while the verbose template should be used in your explanatory paragraph(s).
[TODO: Add example ]
| Classification Label | Definition | What you type | What you see |
| Overly general | The viewpoint expressed is overly general and is not an accurate characterization of all important viewpoints. | {{overly general | First few words ... }} {{overly general | First few words ... | verbose}} | Overly general - [hover mouse for tooltip] Viewpoints - Overly general: " First few words ... " |
| Viewpoints Omitted | One or more important viewpoints are omitted | {{viewpoints omitted | A, B, C,... }} {{viewpoints omitted | A, B, C,... | verbose}} | Viewpoints Omitted - [hover mouse for tooltip] Viewpoints Omitted: " A, B, C,... " |
| Omniscient | The viewpoint expressed is omniscient, i.e. God's-eye view, a.k.a. "eternal truths", "the wisdom of the ages", etc. | {{omniscient | First few words ... }} {{omniscient | First few words ... | verbose}} | Template:Omniscient - [hover mouse for tooltip] Template:Omniscient |
| Unspecified | The viewpoint expressed is not specified, and therefore likely confuses the reader | {{unspecified | First few words ... }} {{unspecified | First few words ... | verbose}} | Template:Unspecified - [hover mouse for tooltip] Template:Unspecified |

## Authorship Analysis

When you enter your analysis of Authorship for each paragraph in the original, use the non-verbose template in the "Summary" while the verbose template should be used in your explanatory paragraph(s).
[TODO: Add example ]
| Classification Label | Definition | What you type | What you see |
| Plagiarism | Text that was taken from another published source without attribution, and therefore would likely be mistaken as original text. | {{plagiarism | this text was plagiarized... | Wikipedia}} {{plagiarism | this text was plagiarized... | Wikipedia | verbose}} | Plagiarism - [hover mouse for tooltip] Plagiarism: " this text was plagiarized " was taken without attribution from Wikipedia |
| Attribution Error | An error or mistake in attribution or source — usually for a quotation | {{attribution error | original attribution | corrected attribution}} {{attribution error | original attribution | corrected attribution | verbose}} | Attribution Error - [hover mouse for tooltip] Attribution Error: " original attribution " should be " corrected attribution " |