# Anarchist FAQ/What is Anarchism?
## Section A - What is Anarchism? (Introduction)

Modern civilisation faces three potentially catastrophic crises:
* social breakdown, a shorthand term for rising rates of poverty, homelessness, crime, violence, alienation, drug and alcohol abuse, social isolation, political apathy, dehumanisation, the deterioration of community structures of self-help and mutual aid, etc.
* destruction of the planet's delicate ecosystems on which all complex forms of life depend.
* the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, particularly nuclear weapons.
Orthodox opinion, including that of Establishment experts, mainstream media, and politicians, generally regards these crises as separable, each having its own causes and therefore capable of being dealt with on a piecemeal basis, in isolation from the other two. Obviously, however, this orthodox approach isn't working, since the problems in question are getting worse. Unless some better approach is taken soon, we are clearly headed for disaster, either from catastrophic war, ecological Armageddon, or a descent into urban savagery - or all of the above.
Anarchism offers a unified and coherent way of making sense of these crises, by tracing them to a common source. This source is the principle of hierarchical authority, which underlies the major institutions of all civilised societies, whether capitalist or communist. Anarchist analysis therefore starts from the fact that all of our major institutions are in the form of hierarchies, i.e. organisations that concentrate power at the top of a pyramidal structure, such as corporations, government bureaucracies, armies, political parties, religious organisations, universities, etc. It then goes on to show how the authoritarian relations inherent in such hierarchies negatively affect individuals, their society, and culture. In the first part of this FAQ (sections A to E) we will present the anarchist analysis of hierarchical authority and its negative effects in greater detail.
It should not be thought, however, that anarchism is just a critique of modern civilisation, just negative or destructive. Because it is much more than that. For one thing, it is also a proposal for a free society. Emma Goldman expressed what might be called the "anarchist question" as follows: "The problem that confronts us today ... is how to be one's self and yet in oneness with others, to feel deeply with all human beings and still retain one's own characteristic qualities." In other words, how can we create a society in which the potential for each individual is realised but not at the expense of others? In order to achieve this, anarchists envision a society in which, instead of being controlled from the top down through hierarchical structures of centralised power, the affairs of humanity will, to quote Benjamin Tucker, "be managed by individuals or voluntary associations." While later sections of the FAQ (sections I and J) will describe anarchism's positive proposals for organising society in this way, from the bottom up, some of the constructive core of anarchism will be seen even in the earlier sections. The positive core of anarchism can even be seen in the anarchist critique of such flawed solutions to the social question as Marxism and right-wing libertarianism (sections F and H, respectively).
As Clifford Harper elegantly puts it, "[l]ike all great ideas, anarchism is pretty simple when you get down to it - human beings are at their best when they are living free of authority, deciding things among themselves rather than being ordered about." Due to their desire to maximise individual and therefore social freedom, anarchists wish to dismantle all institutions that repress people:
   "Common to all Anarchists is the desire to free society of all political and social coercive institutions which stand in the way of the development of a free humanity."
As we'll see, all such institutions are hierarchies, and their repressive nature stems directly from their hierarchical form.
Anarchism is a socio-economic and political theory, but not an ideology. The difference is very important. Basically, theory means you have ideas; an ideology means ideas have you. Anarchism is a body of ideas, but they are flexible, in a constant state of evolution and flux, and open to modification in light of new data. As society changes and develops, so does anarchism. An ideology, in contrast, is a set of fixed ideas which people believe dogmatically, usually ignoring reality or changing it so as to fit with the ideology, which is by definition correct. All such fixed ideas are the source of tyranny and contradiction, leading to attempts to make everyone fit onto a Procrustean Bed. This will be true regardless of the ideology in question - Leninism, Objectivism, Libertarianism, or whatever - all will all have the same effect: the destruction of real individuals in the name of a doctrine, a doctrine that usually serves the interest of some ruling elite. Or, as Michael Bakunin puts it:
   "Until now all human history has been only a perpetual and bloody immolation of millions of poor human beings in honour of some pitiless abstraction - God, country, power of state, national honour, historical rights, judicial rights, political liberty, public welfare."
Dogmas are static and deathlike in their rigidity, often the work of some dead prophet, religious or secular, whose followers erect his or her ideas into an idol, immutable as stone. Anarchists want the living to bury the dead so that the living can get on with their lives. The living should rule the dead, not vice versa. Ideologies are the nemesis of critical thinking and consequently of freedom, providing a book of rules and answers which relieve us of the burden of thinking for ourselves.
In producing this FAQ on anarchism it is not our intention to give you the correct answers or a new rule book. We will explain a bit about what anarchism has been in the past, but we will focus more on its modern forms and why we are anarchists today. The FAQ is an attempt to provoke thought and analysis on your part. If you are looking for a new ideology, then sorry, anarchism is not for you.
While anarchists try to be realistic and practical, we are not reasonable people. Reasonable people uncritically accept what the experts and authorities tell them is true, and so they will always remain slaves. Anarchists know that, as Bakunin wrote:
   "[a] person is strong only when he stands upon his own truth, when he speaks and acts from his deepest convictions. Then, whatever the situation he may be in, he always knows what he must say and do. He may fall, but he cannot bring shame upon himself or his causes."
What Bakunin describes is the power of independent thought, which is the power of freedom. We encourage you not to be reasonable, not to accept what others tell you, but to think and act for yourself.
One last point: to state the obvious, this is not the final word on anarchism. Many anarchists will disagree with much that is written here, but this is to be expected when people think for themselves. All we wish to do is indicate the basic ideas of anarchism and give our analysis of certain topics based on how we understand and apply these ideas. We are sure, however, that all anarchists will agree with the core ideas we present, even if they may disagree with our application of them here and there.

## References

* ↑ Goldman, Emma, Red Emma Speaks: An Emma Goldman Reader, 3rd Edition, Alix Kates Shulman (Ed.), Humanity Books, New York, 1998. pp. 158-159
* ↑ Woodcock, George (ed.), The Anarchist Reader, Fontana, Glasgow, 1987. pp. 149
* ↑ Harper, Clifford, Anarchy: A Graphic Guide, Camden Press, London, 1987. p. vii
* ↑ Rocker, Rudolf, Anarcho-Syndicalism: Theory and Practice, AK Press, Edinburgh/Oakland, 2004. p. 9
* ↑ God and the State, Dover, New York, 1970. p. 59
* ↑ Meltzer, Albert, I Couldn't Paint Golden Angels, AK Press, Edinburgh, 1996. p. 2