OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# EverQuest II/Crafting Reference/Recipes/Tin Bar
## Description

A bar made of tin.

## Recipe

* Primary Component: tin cluster
* Secondary Component: Fossil Temper
* Fuel: coal(1)

## Produces

* crude tin bar
* shaped tin bar
* tin bar
* pristine tin bar

## Used in the following recipes

* Tin Spike
# EverQuest II/Crafting Reference/Recipes/Tin Spike
## Description

A spike made from tin.

## Recipe

Primary Component: Tin Bar Secondary Component: Fossil Temper Fuel: coal(1)

## Produces

* crude tin spike
* shaped tin spike
* tin spike
* pristine tin spike
# EverQuest II/Crafting Reference/Recipes/Roasted Barley
## Description

Brewing various materials together to make roasted barley.

## Produces

* low grade roasted barley
* medium grade roasted barley
* roasted barley
* high grade roasted barley

## Used in the following recipes

* Dark Barley Malt
# EverQuest II/Crafting Reference/Recipes/Turtle Steak
## Produces

* bland turtle steak
* savory turtle steak
* baked turtle steak
* delectable turtle steak

## Used in the following recipes

* Turtle Soup
# EverQuest II/Crafting Reference/Recipes/Weaving Essentials Volume 1

This book contains the following recipes.

## Refine

* Burlap Thread
* Burlap Yarn
* Stretch Of Tanned Leather

## Interim

* Burlap Bowstring
* Burlap Cloth
* Burlap Fletching
* Burlap Padding
* Generic Burlap Pattern
* Tanned Leather Binding
* Tanned Leather Cord
* Tanned Leather Harness
* Tanned Leather Strap
* Tanned Hide Plate
* Tanned Hilt

## Finish

None.
# EverQuest II/Crafting Reference/Recipes/White Tea
## Description

Brewing various materials together to make white tea.

## Produces

* watery white tea
* chilled white tea
* white tea
* refreshing white tea

## Used in the following recipes

* Hot Toddy
* Jumjum Tea
# St. George Defence

Among the three legal moves, two lead to quick checkmate :
    4...Kf6 5. Qf5#
    4...Ke6 5. Qd5+ Kf6 6. Qf5#
So, Black will play 4...g6.

## Theory table

For explanation of theory tables, see theory table and for notation, see algebraic notation. .
'1.e4 a6 2.Bc4 b5 3.Bxf7+ Kxf7 4.Qh5+'
| 4 |
| ... g6 | +/- |
When contributing to this Wikibook, please follow the Conventions for organization.
# St. George Defence
### 2. c4

At first sight, it looks like a refutation of St Georges Defence. But Black keeps the powerful ability to play 2...e5, transposing into an open game where White have a misplaced pawn on c4.
2...b5 looks compromised as Black will lose one of the main benefit of the St Georges : the power at the queen side.

## Theory table

For explanation of theory tables, see theory table and for notation, see algebraic notation. .
'1.e4 a6 2.c4'
| 2 |
| ... e5 | =/+ |
| ... b5 | +/= |
When contributing to this Wikibook, please follow the Conventions for organization.

## References

* Kasparov, Garry, & Keene, Raymond 1989 Batsford chess openings 2. ISBN 0-8050-3409-9.
# St. George Defence
### 3.Bxf7+

One legal move available : 3...Kxf7

## Theory table

For explanation of theory tables, see theory table and for notation, see algebraic notation. .
'1.e4 a6 2.Bc4 b5 3.Bxf7+'
| 3 |
| ... Kxf7 | +/- |
When contributing to this Wikibook, please follow the Conventions for organization.

## References

* This Chess related article is a stub. Please assist Wikibooks by expanding it.
# St. George Defense
### 2. ... e6

A common defense in St. George's Defense.
When contributing to this Wikibook, please follow the Conventions for organization.
# St. George Defence

Development keeps going. Black should now play 3...Bb7, putting pressure on the e pawn (remember that White cannot play Nc3 to protect the pawn !). 3...e6 can also be played (and will anyway be played at some point in the opening), but why giving White more liberty when it's possible to force the following moves ?

## Theory table

For explanation of theory tables, see theory table and for notation, see algebraic notation. .
'1.e4 a6 2.d4 b5 3.Nf3'
| 3 |
| ... Bb7 | = |
| ... e6 | = |
When contributing to this Wikibook, please follow the Conventions for organization.
# St. George Defence

To get back the material, White must play 4. Qh5+

## Theory table

For explanation of theory tables, see theory table and for notation, see algebraic notation. .
'1.e4 a6 2.Bc4 b5 3.Bxf7+ Kxf7'
| 4 |
| Qh5+ - | +/- |
When contributing to this Wikibook, please follow the Conventions for organization.
# St. George Defence
### 4...g6

White's next move is 5. Qd5+

## Theory table

For explanation of theory tables, see theory table and for notation, see algebraic notation. .
'1.e4 a6 2.Bc4 b5 3.Bxf7+ Kxf7 4.Qh5+ g6'
| 5 |
| Qd5+ - | +/- |
When contributing to this Wikibook, please follow the Conventions for organization.
# St. George Defence
### 5.Qd5+

This move is a fork, winning the rook on a8. White has now won the exchange.
When contributing to this Wikibook, please follow the Conventions for organization.
# St. George Defence
### 2.d4

Logically, Black should now play 2...b5. He may eventually delay it and play 2...e6.

## Theory table

For explanation of theory tables, see theory table and for notation, see algebraic notation.
'1.e4 a6 2.d4'
| | 2 |
| Main line | ... b5 | = |
| | ... e6 | = |
When contributing to this Wikibook, please follow the Conventions for organization.

## References

* Kasparov, Garry, & Keene, Raymond 1989 Batsford chess openings 2. ISBN 0-8050-3409-9.
* This Chess related article is a stub. Please assist Wikibooks by expanding it.
# Economic Sophisms/225

<pagequality level="3" user="Zoeannl" />style="background: #ececec; text-align: left; padding-left: 0.5em; font-weight: bold;" class="table-rh"evening four baskets of game, if you would give me in exchange two baskets of vegetables.'
"At these words Robinson and Friday retired to consult, and the argument that passed is too interesting not to be reported in extenso.
"FRIDAY: What do you think of it? "ROBINSON: If we close with the proposal, we are ruined. "F.: Are you sure of that? Let us consider.
"R.: The case is clear. Crushed by competition, our hunting as a branch of industry is annihilated.
"F.: What matters it, if we have the game?
"R.: Theory! it will no longer be the product of our labour.
"F.: I beg your pardon, sir; for in order to have game we must part with vegetables.
"R.: Then, what shall we gain?
"F.: The four baskets of game cost us six hours' work. The foreigner gives us them in exchange for two baskets of vegetables, which cost us only three hours' work. This places three hours at our disposal.
"R.: Say, rather, which aRe Template:SIC from our exertions. In this will consist our loss. Lahour is wealth, and if we lose a fourth part of our time, we shall be less rich by a fourth.
"F.: You are greatly mistaken, my good friend. We shall have as much game, and the same quantity of vegetables, and three hours at our disposal into the bargain. This is progress, or there is no such thing in the world.
"R.: You lose yourself in generalities! What should we make of these three hours? "F.: We would do something else.
"R.: Ah! I understand you. You cannot come to particulars. Something else, something else—this is easily said.
"F.: We can fish, we can ornament our cottage, we can read the Bible.
"R.: Utopia ! Is there any certainty that we should do either the one or the other?
"F.: Very well, if we have no wants to satisfy we can rest. Is repose nothing?
"R.: But while we repose we may die of hunger.
"F.: My dear friend, you have got into a vicious circle. I
# Economic Sophisms/23

<pagequality level="4" user="Zoeannl" />style="background: #ececec; text-align: left; padding-left: 0.5em; font-weight: bold;" class="table-rh"the air which we breathe; and yet the realization of his desires would not be at variance with the good of society.
It may be said that if these wishes were granted, the work of the producer would become more and more limited, and would end with being stopped for want of aliment. But why? Because, on this extreme supposition, all imaginable wants and desires would be fully satisfied. Man, like Omnipotence, would create all things by a simple act of volition. Well, on this hypotheses, what reason should we have to regret the stoppage of industrial production?
I made the supposition, not long ago, of the existence of an assembly composed of workmen, each member of which, in his capacity of producer, should have the power of passing a law embodying his secret wish, and I said that the code which would emanate from that assembly would be monopoly systematized, the theory of scarcity reduced to practice.
In the same way, a chamber in which each should consult exclusively his own immediate interest as a consumer, would tend to systematize liberty, to suppress all restrictive measures, to overthrow all artificial barriers—in a word, to realize the theory of plenty.
Hence it follows:
That to consult exclusively the immediate interest of the producer, is to consult an interest which is anti-social;
That to take for basis exclusively the immediate interest of the consumer, would be to take for basis the general interest.
Let me enlarge on this view of the subject a little, at the risk of being prolix.
A radical antagonism exists between seller and buyer.
The former desires that the subject of the bargain should be scarce, its supply limited, and its price high.
The latter desires that it should be abundant, its supply large, and its price low.
The laws, which should be at least neutral, take the part of the seller against the buyer, of the producer against the consumer, of dearness against cheapness, of scarcity against abundance.
* ↑ The author has modified somewhat the terms of this proposition in a posterior work.—See Harmonies Économiques, chaper xi.—EDITOR.
* ↑ We have not in French a substantive to express the idea opposed to
# Economic Sophisms/231

IF anyone tells you that there are no absolute principles, no inflexible rules; that prohibition may be bad and yet that restriction may be good,
Reply: "Restriction prohibits all that it hinders from being imported."
If anyone says that agriculture is the nursing-mother of the country,
Reply: "What nourishes the country is not exactly agriculture, but corn."
If anyone tells you that the basis of the food of the people is agriculture,
Reply: "The basis of the people's food is com. This is the reason why a law which gives us, by agricultural labour, two quarters of corn, when we could have obtained four quarters without such labour, and by means of labour applied to manufactures, is a law not for feeding, but for starving the people."
If any one remarks that restriction upon the importation of foreign corn gives rise to a more extensive culture, and consequently to increased home production,
Reply: "It induces men to sow grain on comparatively barren and ungrateful soils. To milk a cow and go on milking her, puts a little more into the pail, for it is difficult to say when you will come to the last drop. But that drop costs dear."
If any one tells you that when bread is dear, the agriculturist, having become rich, enriches the manufacturer,
Reply: "Bread is dear when it is scarce, and then men are poor, or, if you like it better, they become rich starvelings."
If you are further told that when bread gets dearer, wages rise,
Reply by pointing out that, in April 1847, five-sixths of our workmen were receiving charity.
If you are told that the wages of labour should rise with the increased price of provisions,
Reply: "This is as much as to say that in a ship without provisions, everybody will have as much biscuit as if the vessel were fully victualled."
If you are told that it is necessary to secure a good price to the man who sells corn,
Reply: "That in that case it is also necessary to secure good wages to the man who buys it."
If it is said that the proprietors, who make the laws, have raised the price of bread, without taking thought about wages, because they know that when bread rises, wages naturally rise,
Reply: "Upon the same principle, when the workmen come to make the laws, don't blame them if they fix a high rate of wages without busying themselves about protecting com, because they know that when wages rise, provisions naturally rise also."
If you are asked what, then, is to be done?
Reply: "Be just to everybody."
If you are told that it is essential that every great country should produce iron.
Reply: "What is essential is, that every great country should have iron."
If you are told that it is indispensable that every great country should produce cloth.
# Economic Sophisms/224

<pagequality level="3" user="Zoeannl" />style="background: #ececec; text-align: left; padding-left: 0.5em; font-weight: bold;" class="table-rh"Template:Hwe labour; and, now that I think of it, I can even increase that labour by throwing back the other plank into the sea.'"
"But this reasoning was absurd."
"No doubt. It is nevertheless the reasoning of every nation which protects itself by prohibition. It throws back the plank which is offered it in exchange for a small amount of labour in order to exert a greater amount of labour. It is not in the labour of the Customhouse officials that it discovers a gain. That gain is represented by the pains which Robinson takes to render back to the waves the gift which they had offered him. Consider the nation as a collective being, and you will not find between its reasoning and that of Robinson an atom of difference."
"Did Robinson not see that he could devote the time saved to something else?"
"What else?"
"As long as a man has wants to satisfy and time at his disposal, there is always something to be done. I am not bound to specify the kind of labour he would in such a case undertake."
"I see clearly what labour he could have escaped."
"And I maintain that Robinson, with incredible blindness, confounded the labour with its result, the end with the means, and I am going to prove to you …"
"There is no need. Here we have the system of restriction or prohibition in its simplest form. If it appear to you absurd when so put, it is because the two capacities of producer and consumer are in this case mixed up in the same individual."
"Let us pass on, therefore, to a more complicated example."
"With all my heart. Some time afterwards, Robinson having met with Friday, they united their labour in a common work. In the morning they hunted for six hours, and brought home four baskets of game. In the evening they worked in the garden for six hours, and obtained four baskets of vegetables.
"One day a canoe touched at the island. A good-looking foreigner landed, and was admitted to the table of our two recluses. He tasted and commended very much the produce of the garden, and before taking leave of his entertainers, spoke as follows:—
"'Generous islanders, I inhabit a country where game is much more plentiful than here, but where horticulture is quite unknown. It would be an easy matter to bring you every
# Economic Sophisms/226

<pagequality level="3" user="Zoeannl" />style="background: #ececec; text-align: left; padding-left: 0.5em; font-weight: bold;" class="table-rh"speak of a repose which will subtract nothing from our supply of game and vegetables. You always forget that by means of our foreign trade nine hours' labour will give us the same quantity of provisions that we obtain at present with twelve.
"R: It is very evident, Friday, that you have not been educated in Europe, and that you have never read the Moniteur Industriel. If you had, it would have taught you this: that all time saved is sheer loss. The important thing is not to eat or consume, but to work. All that we consume, if it is not the direct produce of our labour, goes for nothing. Do you want to know whether you are rich? Never consider the satisfactions you enjoy, but the labour you undergo. This is what the Moniteur Industriel would teach you. For myself, who have no pretensions to be a theorist, the only thing I look at is the loss of our hunting.
"F.: What a strange conglomeration of ideas! but …
"R.: I will have no buts. Moreover, there are political reasons for rejecting the interested offers of the perfidious foreigner.
"F.: Political reasons!
"R.: Yes, he only makes us these offers because they are advantageous to him.
"F.: So much the better, since they are for our advantage likewise.
"R.: Then by this traffic we should place ourselves in a situation of dependence upon him.
"F.: And he would place himself in dependence on us. We should have need of his game, and he of our vegetables, and we should live on terms of friendship.
"R.: System! Do you want me to shut your mouth?
"F.: We shall see about that. I have as yet heard no good reason.
"R.: Suppose the foreigner learns to cultivate a garden, and that his island should prove more fertile than ours. Do you see the consequence?
"F.: Yes; our relations with the foreigner would cease. He would send us no more vegetables, since he could have them at home with less labour. He would take no more game from us, since we should have nothing to give him in exchange, and we
should then be in precisely the situation that you wish us in now.
# Economic Sophisms/228

<pagequality level="3" user="Zoeannl" />style="background: #ececec; text-align: left; padding-left: 0.5em; font-weight: bold;" class="table-rh"its own nature identical with commerce, just as labour on a small scale is identical with labour on a great scale, or as the law of gravitation which moves an atom is identical with that same law of gravitation which moves a world."
"So, according to you, these arguments, which are so untenable in the mouth of Robinson, are equally untenable when urged by our protectionists."
"Yes; only the error is better concealed under a complication of circumstances."
"Then, pray, let us have an example taken from the present order of things."
"With pleasure. In France, owing to the exigencies of climate and habits, cloth is a useful thing. Is the essential thing to make it, or to get it?"
"A very sensible question, truly ! In order to have it, you must make it."
"Not necessarily. To have it, some one must make it, that is certain; but it is not at all necessary that the same person or the same country which consumes it should also produce it. You have not made that stuff which clothes you so well. France does not produce the coffee on which our citizens breakfast"
"But I buy my cloth, and France her coffee."
"Exactly so; and with what?"
"With money."
"But neither you nor France produce the material of money."
"We buy it"
"With what?"
"With our products, which are sent to Peru."
"It is then, in fact, your labour which you exchange for cloth, and French labour which is exchanged for coffee."
"Undoubtedly."
"It is not absolutely necessary, therefore, to manufacture what you consume."
"No; if we manufacture something else which we give in exchange."
"In other words, France has two means of procuring a given quantity of cloth. The first is to make it; the second is to make something else, and to exchange this something else with the foreigner for cloth. Of these two means, which is the best?"
# Economic Sophisms/232

<pagequality level="3" user="Zoeannl" />style="background: #ececec; text-align: left; padding-left: 0.5em; font-weight: bold;" class="table-rh"Reply: "The indispensable thing is, that the citizens of every great country should have cloth."
If it be said that labour is wealth,
Reply: "This is not true."
And, by way of improvement, add: "Phlebotomy is not health, and the proof of it is that bleeding is resorted to for the purpose of restoring health."
If it is said: "To force men to cultivate rocks, and extract an ounce of iron from a hundredweight of ore, is to increase their labour and consequently their wealth,"
Reply: "To force men to dig wells by prohibiting them from taking water from the brook, is to increase their useless labour, but not their wealth."
If you are told that the sun gives you his heat and light without remuneration,
Reply: "So much the better for me, for it costs me nothing to see clearly."
And if you are answered that industry in general loses what would have been paid for artificial light,
Rejoin: "No; for having paid nothing to the sun, what he saves me enables me to buy clothes, furniture, and candles."
In the same way, if you are told that these rascally English possess capital which is dormant,
Reply :"So much the better for us; they will not make us pay interest for it."
If it is said : " These perfidious English find coal and iron in the same pit,"
Reply: "So much the better for us; they will charge us nothing for bringing them together."
If you are told that the Swiss have rich pasturages, which cost little:
Reply: "The advantage is ours, for they will demand a smaller amount of our labour in return for giving an impetus to our agriculture, and supplying us with provisions."
If they tell you that the lands of the Crimea have no value, and pay no taxes,
Reply: "The profit is ours, who buy corn free from such charges."
If they tell you that the serfs of Poland work without wages,
# Economic Sophisms/227

<pagequality level="3" user="Zoeannl" />style="background: #ececec; text-align: left; padding-left: 0.5em; font-weight: bold;" class="table-rh""R.: Improvident savage! You don't see that after having annihilated our hunting by inundating us with game, he would annihilate our gardening by inundating us with vegetables.
"F: But this would only last till we were in a situation to give him something else; that is to say, until we found something else which we could produce with economy of labour for ourselves.
"R: Something else, something else! You always come back to that. You are at sea, my good friend Friday; there is nothing practical in your views.
"The debate was long prolonged, and, as often happens, each remained wedded to his own opinion. But Robinson possessing a great ascendant over Friday, his opinion prevailed, and when the foreigner arrived to demand a reply, Robinson said to him—
"'Stranger, in order to induce us to accept your proposal, we must be assured of two things:
"'The first is, that your island is no better stocked with game than ours, for we want to fight only with equal weapons.
"'The second is, that you will lose by the bargain. For, as in every exchange there is necessarily a gaining and a losing party, we should be dupes, if you were not the loser. What have you got to say?'
"'Nothing,' replied the foreigner; and, bursting out a-laughing, he regained his canoe."
"The story would not be amiss, if Robinson were not made to argue so very absurdly."
"He does not argue more absurdly than the committee of the rue Hauteville."
"Oh! the case is very different Sometimes you suppose one man, and sometimes (which comes to the same thing) two men working in company. That does not tally with the actual state of things. The division of labour and the intervention of merchants and money change the state of the question very much."
"That may complicate transactions, but does not change their nature."
"What ! you want to compare modern commerce with a system of barter."
"Trade is nothing but a multiplicity of barters. Barter is in