OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# King's Gambit Accepted, 4...g4

With this move, Black reveals the full purpose of 3...g5 — not only did the g pawn protect Black's extra f pawn, it also threatened to dislodge White's sole defender of the h4 square, the knight on f3. White must now reconcile the dual threats of 5...gxf3 and 5...Qh4+.
White can safely ignore the threat with 5.O-O!, sacrificing his knight in order to move his king to safety, develop his rook to the semi-open f file, and rapidly develop his queen to f3. If White so chooses, he can sacrifice a second piece to move the Black king to the f-file, giving White excellent practical chances.
Because the Muzio and double Muzio gambits give Black an overwhelming number of problems to solve over the board, most players avoid this line completely and simply play 4...Bg7 with a good game.
White's alternative fifth moves, 5.Nc3!? and 5.Bxf7+, are relics of a bygone era and thus rarely seen in tournament play, also Ne5 allows Qh4+.

## Theory table

For explanation of theory tables, see theory table and for notation, see algebraic notation. .
1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4.Bc4 g4
| | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | |
| Muzio Gambit | O-O! gxf3 | Qxf3 Qf6 | e5!? Qxe5 | d3 Bh6 | Nc3 Ne7 | Bd2 Nbc6 | Rae1 Qf5 | Nd5 Kd8 | Qe2 Qe6 | Qf2 Qf5 | = |
| Double Muzio Gambit | ... ... | ... ... | ... ... | Bxf7+ Kxf7 | d4 Qf5 | g4 Qg6 | Bxf4 Nf6 | =+ |
| McDonnell Gambit | Nc3!? gxf3 | ∞ |
| Wild Muzio (Lolli) Gambit | Bxf7+!? Kxf7 | ∞ |
When contributing to this Wikibook, please follow the Conventions for organization.
5. Ne5

## References

* Modern Chess Openings: MCO-14. 1999. Nick de Firmian, Walter Korn. ISBN 0-8129-3084-3.
# King's Gambit Accepted, Muzio Gambit

With 5. O-O, White gambits the knight for a massive lead in development. Most of the time Black takes the Knight and plays 6...Qf6 or 6...Qe7 afterward.
Sometimes White sacrifices his light-squared bishop to draw out the Black king on the heavy f-file, and the play is often White's initiative vs. Black's material lead.
Black can also sacrifice his d-pawn to slow down White with 5...d5 (Brentano defence) and then 6...gxf3.
There is also the Kling and Horwitz counterattck 5...Qe7.

## Theory table

For explanation of theory tables, see theory table and for notation, see algebraic notation. .
| | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Sarratt Defense | ... gxf3 | Qxf3 Qf6 | e5 Qxe5 | -/= |
| From's Defense | ... ... | ... Qe7 | d4 Nc6 | -/= |
When contributing to this Wikibook, please follow the Conventions for organization.
# Chess Opening Theory/1. e4/1...e5/2. f4/2...exf4/3. Nf3/3...g5/4. h4/4...g4/5. Ne5

| | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | |
| 8 | | | | | | | | | 8 |
| 7 | | | | | | | | | 7 |
| 6 | | | | | | | | | 6 |
| 5 | | | | | | | | | 5 |
| 4 | | | | | | | | | 4 |
| 3 | | | | | | | | | 3 |
| 2 | | | | | | | | | 2 |
| 1 | | | | | | | | | 1 |
| | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | |
The Kieseritzky Gambit has been considered the main line of the King's Gambit for a long time. The continuations that follow this position have interesting strategic possibilities for both sides. It was popularized by Lionel Kieseritzky in the 1840s. It was used very successfully by Wilhelm Steinitz, and was used by Boris Spassky to beat Bobby Fischer in a famous game at Mar del Plata in 1960. This motivated Fischer into developing his own defense to the King's Gambit (the Fischer Defense). It's been out of favour at high levels for a few decades now though, as analysts with computers have found mistake after mistake in the old Victorian books.
Black's pawn on g4 is attacked, but Black is still a pawn up, so giving back one of the two pawns on f4 and g4 wouldn't be a disaster. As a secondary consideration, f7 is also attacked and White may be able to intensify the attack with Bc4 if given the chance.
* That f7 weakness is why the mechanical attempt to protect the pawn with 5...h5 doesn't work too well. 6.Bc4 would leave Black resorting to awkward defensive moves like ...Nh6 and ...Rh7.
* 5...Nf6 is the most common move, not to defend the g4-pawn (because it doesn't) but to counter-attack e4 and so deny White the necessary tempo to capture on g4. If White takes a move to defend e4, Black can then unleash the c8-bishop with ...d6, which does defend the g4-pawn and drives away the White knight.
* 5...d6 is the main alternative to 5...Nf6. After 6.Nxg4 Nf6 it looks as though Black has just played the moves in the wrong order, but the point is that after exchanging knights on f6 it will be Black who has come out of the King's Gambit with a lead in development. This is the perennial problem with playing gambits: can your opponent gain more by giving the material back than you gained by sacrificing it?
* 5...Bg7 prepares to set a dastardly trap if White takes the pawn, but an alert White player has a couple ways of dodging it.
* 5...Qe7 generally wins the pawn back but at the cost of trading off the queens, which blunts Black's attacking potential and makes the weak f-pawns into more of a factor.

## Theory table

For explanation of theory tables, see theory table and for notation, see algebraic notation. .
1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 g5 4. h4 g4 5. Ne5
| 5 | 6 |
| ... Nf6 |
| ... d6 | Nxg4 Nf6 |
When contributing to this Wikibook, please follow the Conventions for organization.

## References

* Fundamental Chess Openings (2009). Paul van der Sterren. ISBN 1-906454-13-2.
* The King's Gambit (2013). John Shaw. ISBN 978-1-906552-71-8.
* "The King's Gambit". The Gambiteer's Guild. Retrieved 25 Jul 2014.
# Biological Physics/The Third Law

So far, we have encountered the first two laws of thermodynamics, and now it is time to see the third. For an ideal gas, recall how entropy, energy, and temperature are related $dS={\frac {dU}{T}}$ where temperature is held constant. Now when volume is also held constant, work on the system $W=P\Delta V=0$, so $dS={\frac {dQ}{T}}$. By the definition of heat in terms of heat capacity $dS={\frac {CdT}{T}}$. To add up all the small incremental dSs, $\Delta S=\int _{T_{i}}^{T_{f}}{\frac {CdT}{T}}$.
Now, what happens as $T_{i}=0$? Then, $\Delta S=\int _{0}^{T_{f}}{\frac {CdT}{T}}$, where if C is not dependent on temperature, $\Delta S=C\int _{0}^{T_{f}}{\frac {dT}{T}}$. Then, $\Delta S=C*ln(T_{f})-ln(0)$. Since ln(0) approaches -∞, then this means that $\Delta S$ gets infinitely large as $T\rightarrow 0$, which is not good! So, there must be some temperature dependence in the heat capacity C.
The Third Law of Thermodynamics states that heat capacity C must go to zero faster than ln(0) goes to infinity, implying $\Delta S\rightarrow 0$. So, the multiplicity Ω where $S=k_{B}ln(\Omega )$ must be $ln(\Omega )=S(0K)=0$ which implies $\Omega =e^{0}=1$. So a more intuitive way to state the third law would be
There's only one configuration for a system at 0 K.

### Playing the Game

A fun way to remember the Three Laws of Thermodynamics is with the following way:
0th Law
- You must play the game
1st Law
- You can't win the game
2nd Law
- You can't even break even
3rd Law
- Not even on a cold day
And there you have it: the Three Laws of Thermodynamics!
# Biological Physics/Figures

Putting links to images that may still need to be properly incorporated into the text.
# Biological Physics/Stirling's Approximation

Calculating entropy directly calls for us to calculate factorials. Taking factorials of relatively small numbers is not a problem (at least with a computer). However, once you begin to work in systems that have a very large number of particles and energy packets (on the order of a mole, or $10^{23}$), it becomes clear that a direct calculation for factorials is not feasible. Rather, an approximation for the entropy must be developed. We will look more closely at what is known as Stirling's Approximation.
Recall that the multiplicity Ω for ideal solids is $\Omega ={\frac {(N+n-1)!}{n!(N-1)!}}$ and entropy is $S=k_{B}{\rm {ln}}(\Omega )$. $S=k_{B}{\rm {ln}}({\frac {(N+n-1)!}{n!(N-1)!}})$. By the rules of logarithms, ${\frac {S}{k_{B}}}=[{\rm {ln}}(N+n-1)!-{\rm {ln}}(n!)-{\rm {ln}}(N-1)!]$.
All terms are essentially logarithms of factorials, so let's study the general case.
${\rm {ln}}(x!)={\rm {ln}}((x)(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)...(2)(1))$, which implies by the rules of logarithms ${\rm {ln}}(x!)={\rm {ln}}(x)+{\rm {ln}}(x-1)+{\rm {ln}}(x-2)+...+{\rm {ln}}(2)+{\rm {ln}}(1)$, or ${\rm {ln}}(x!)=\sum \limits _{i=0}^{x}{\rm {ln}}(i)$. For very large values (think on the order of magnitude of moles), this can be approximated by ${\rm {ln}}(x!)\approx \int _{1}^{x}{\rm {ln}}(i)di$, which has a solution $\int _{1}^{x}{\rm {ln}}(i)di=i{\rm {ln}}(i)-i{\Big |}_{1}^{x}$. And by the fundamental theorem of calculus, ${\rm {ln}}(x!)\approx x{\rm {ln}}(x)-x+1$. For very large numbers, the 1 becomes negligible, so ${\rm {ln}}(x!)\approx x{\rm {ln}}(x)-x$. So this gives us the following approximations
${\rm {ln}}(N+n-1)\approx (N+n-1){\rm {ln}}(N+n-1)-(N+n-1)$
${\rm {ln}}(x!)\approx n{\rm {ln}}(n)-n$
${\rm {ln}}(N-1)\approx (N-1){\rm {ln}}(N-1)-(N-1)$
So $(N+n-1){\rm {ln}}(N+n-1)-{\rm {ln}}(n)-{\rm {ln}}(N-1)\approx (N+n-1){\rm {ln}}(N+n-1)-(N+n-1)-n{\rm {ln}}(n)+n-(N-1){\rm {ln}}(N-1)+(N-1)$.
With some simplification, $(N+n-1){\rm {ln}}(N+n-1)-n{\rm {ln}}(n)-(N-1){\rm {ln}}(N-1)$
Once again, let's make the assumption that these numbers are very large, making 1 negligible. So $(N+n){\rm {ln}}(N+n)-n{\rm {ln}}(n)-(N){\rm {ln}}(N)$
Therefore, entropy can be approximated with $S=k_{B}[(N+n){\rm {ln}}(N+n)-n{\rm {ln}}(n)-(N-1){\rm {ln}}(N-1)]$. This is Stirling's Approximation. If you recall that numbers out in front of a logarithm can be written as the power of the number inside the logarithm, so $S=k_{B}[{\rm {ln}}((N+n)^{(N+n)})-{\rm {ln}}(n^{n})-{\rm {ln}}(N^{N})]$, or $S=k_{B}{\rm {ln}}[{\frac {(N+n)^{(N+n)}}{(n^{n})(N^{N})}}]$. For calculations, the first equation would be better since it doesn't exponentiate before it takes a logarithm.
# Biological Physics/Boyles Law

This section explores Boyle’s Law and the relation between the pressure and volume of an ideal gas. In general, Boyle’s Law states that as the volume decreases, the pressure of an ideal gas increases. The opposite is also true: as the volume of an ideal gas increases, the pressure decreases as a result. In other words, these two properties are inversely related. For simplicity, we will only consider gases that are at a constant temperature.
Let us consider the isothermal process in which an ideal gas remains at a constant temperature. The formula PV = NkBT describes the state of a gas at some point. This can be rearranged so that pressure equals: $P={\frac {Nk_{B}T}{V}}$, where N is the number of particles, k$_B$ is the Boltzmann constant, T is temperature in Kelvin, and V is volume in m$^3$. To illustrate this relationship, Figure 1 shows the inverse relationship of pressure related to volume.
To calculate the work done on an ideal gas, the formula $W=-P\Delta V$ must be considered. Recall that pressure and volume are inversely related, so if pressure changes then volume will also undergo a change. Since both variables are changing, we must use the integral to consider this change: $W=-PdV=-\int _{V_{i}}^{V_{f}}{\frac {Nk_{B}T}{V}}dV$. If we then take out the constants, this formula can be rewritten as $W=-Nk_{B}T\int _{V_{i}}^{V_{f}}{\frac {1}{V}}dV$. Evaluating the integral gives us the following equation: $W=-Nk_{B}T{\Biggln(V_{f})-ln(V_{i}){\Bigg )}$, which can also be written as: $W=Nk_{B}Tln{\Bigg{\frac {V_{i}}{V_{f}}}{\Bigg )}$. This is the work done for an ideal gas with a constant temperature and a change in volume.
To illustrate Boyle's Law, you can do a simple experiment involving a syringe, weights, and a pressure meter. Figure 1 and 3 shows the setup used for this demonstration. First, measure the pressure when there are no weights placed on top of the syringe. This should be atmospheric pressure, which is around 101,325 Pascals. To measure the change in pressure and volume, begin by placing weights on top of the syringe until the plunger moves to the next milliliter mark. At this point, measure the mass, pressure, volume, and distance from one milliliter marking to the next. Continue with this procedure until the plunger reaches the 1 milliliter marking or until the pressure sensor reaches its maximum reading. Once you have collected all the data, graph the pressure versus volume. You can also calculate the work done by using the derived formula above and compare it to the formula $W=mgx$ where m is the mass in kg of the weights, g is the gravitational acceleration (9.8 m/s$^2$, and x is the distance the plunger moved in meters.
Figure 3 displays a diagram of the experimental setup where the plunger has gone down one milliliter (from 5 mL to 4 mL) due to the force of the 400 g pushing on the top of the plunger. The syringe is hooked up to a pressure meter which displays the pressure readout in kPa on the computer screen using LoggerPro.
# Biological Physics/Charles' Law

An important idea that can be directly derived from the Ideal Gas Law is known as Charles's Law. Charles's Law describes a relationship between temperature and volume of an ideal gas when other factors are held constant. It says that temperature and volume are directly proportional to each other $PV=Nk_{B}T$. That means as one increases, the other also increases.
A simple experiment can be done to illustrate Charles's Law. Take a balloon, fill it with air and tie it. Next, subject the balloon to different temperatures and measure the circumference. By assuming that the balloon is spherical, we can easily calculate the volume and determine how volume is dependent on temperature.
    $V=4\pi r^{3}$
    $C=\pi r^{2}$
    $r={\sqrt {\frac {C}{\pi }}}$
    $V=4\pi {\Bigg{\sqrt {\frac {C}{\pi }}}{\Bigg )}^{3}$
You can see below the circumferences and subsequent volumes that we obtained and calculated of our balloon at different temperatures.
| Temperature (K) | Circumference (cm) | Volume (m^3) |
| 273 | 49 | 0.00199 |
| 296 | 51 | 0.00224 |
| 313 | 51.5 | 0.00231 |
| 338 | 53.5 | 0.00259 |
A graph illustrating how the balloons volume is directly proportional to temperature is shown below.
There was one more temperature that was tested, but not formally recorded. When the balloon was submersed in liquid nitrogen (a temperature of about 77 K), it seemed to have completely deflated. What really happened was that the temperature was so low that the volume decreased dramatically. When the balloon heated back up, the volume again increased back to its prior size. This can be seen in a YouTube video.
# Biological Physics/Boyle's Law

Boyle's Law states that the volume and pressure are inversely proportional. This means that as the volume of gas in a container decreases, the pressure increases. To test Boyle's Law a syringe was attached to a pressure meter and weights were added to the plunger to show the relationship between the volume and pressure inside the syringe. Below is a table of values showing the results of the experiment. In the table to work done is calculated based on the difiniton of work, W=mgΔx, and work derived from the ideal gas law, $W=Nk_{b}Tln({\frac {V_{i}}{V_{f}}})$.
| Mass (kg) | W=mgΔx | Pressure (Pa) | Volume ($m^{3}$) | $W=Nk_{b}Tln({\frac {V_{i}}{V_{f}}})$ | Distance (m) |
| 0.0000 | 0.0000 | $1.0209*10^{5}$ | $5.0000*10^{-6}$ | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
| 0.3000 | 0.0265 | $1.2280*10^{5}$ | $4.0000*10^{-6}$ | 0.1139 | 0.0090 |
| 0.8000 | 0.0706 | $1.6130*10^{5}$ | $3.0000*10^{-6}$ | 0.1468 | 0.0180 |
| 1.5000 | 0.1323 | $2.2387*10^{5}$ | $2.0000*10^{-6}$ | 0.2070 | 0.0270 |
Below is a graph showing the relationship between the pressure and volume inside the syringe.
# Business English/Speaking and Listening

    Business English/Interviewing
# Business English/Tips for Teachers
## Link

* http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=most+common+english+words&meta= Lists of Common Vocabulary
# Business English/Phrasal Verbs/Turn

turn in, turn on, turn out, turn over, turn off
# Business English/Phrasal Verbs/Up

to bang up – maltratar (equipo); hacer algo muy bien
Be careful not to bang up my bike too much please. Great work, that was a real bang-up job!
to beat up – pegar, dar una paliza The New Cork cops beat up more than one innocent person.
to bottle up – no dejar salir a las emociones People who bottle up their feelings can develop emotional problems later on.
to box up – poner en cajas
to bring up – mencionar, traer hasta arriba
to brush up – repasar
to call up – llamar por telephono (esp. después de tiempo);
to chop up – cortar en pedazos
to clean up – limpiar
to come up with – imaginar
to crop up – aparecer de repente
to cross up – condundirse entre varias cosas
to dance up a storm – bailar mucho o con gusto
to dig up – encontrar, sacar desde el pasado
to do up – preparer
to draw up – preparer (planos)
to dream up – imaginar
to drink up – tomar
to eat up – comer, comerse to do
to feel up to – tener ganas o fuerzas para hacer algo
to flare up – empeorar de repente, llenarse de llamas
to fold up – doblar
to freeze up – congelar (maquinas); quedarse callado por miedo
to freshen up –
to hang up – colgar (ropa, el teléfono)
to hold up – detener, robar
to hook up – hacer conección
to keep up – hacer siguimiento;
to kick up – generar (usu. problemas)
to kiss up – hacer halagos inmerecidos
to laugh it up – reírse de algo
to light up – encender
to lighten up – tomar una actitud más positiva
to line up – poner en fila
to link up – hacer liga entre
to liven up – hacer más divertido
to loosen up – relajarse
to mess up – equivocarse
to own up – confesar
to pack up – preparar equipaje
to pile up – amontonar
to polish up – poner brillo
to pull up – llegar (en coche)
to roll up – enroller
to run up – gastar (una cuenta)
to screw up – confundir, hacer problemas con algo
to shoot up – injector (esp. drogas illegales)
to show up – aparecer
to snuggle up – acercarse cariñosamente
to speed up – accelerarse
to split up – divider; terminar (con novio/a)
to stir up – mezclar, causar (problemas)
to sum up – sumar
to talk up – hablar de las virtudes de
to think up – imaginar
to tighten up – apretar
to turn up – subir (volumen); aparecer
to wash up – lavarse
# Business English/Topics

    Work
    Branding
    Marketing
    Finance
    Big Business
    Home Office
    Computers and Technology
    Engineering
    Sports
    Business Books and Magazines
    Cold Calling
    Starting Your Own Business
    American Culture
    American Business Culture
    Time Management
    Bad News Letters
    Routine and Good News Letters
# Character Encodings/Code Tables/EBCDIC/EBCDIC 264

IBM code page 264 (CCSID 264) is an EBCDIC code page with full ASCII used in IBM mainframes. It is also called EBCDIC Print Train & Text Processing Extended. This code page is supported by IBM. It is a superset of code page 1002 and code page 1003.

## Codepage layout

Characters are shown with their equivalent Unicode codes.
EBCDIC 264 :
| | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | A | B | C | D | E | F |
| 0x | NUL | SOH | STX | ETX | SEL | HT | RNL | DEL | GE | SPS | RPT | VT | FF | CR | SO | SI |
| 1x | DLE | DC1 | DC2 | DC3 | RES/ ENP | NL | BS | POC | CAN | EM | UBS | CU1 | IFS | IGS | IRS | ITB |
| 2x | DS | SOS | FS | WUS | BYP/ INP | LF | ETB | ESC | SA | SFE | SM/ SW | CSP | MFA | ENQ | ACK | BEL |
| 3x | | | SYN | IR | PP | TRN | NBS | EOT | SBS | IT | RFF | CU3 | DC4 | NAK | | SUB |
| 4x | SP | NBSP | | | | | | | | | ¢ 00A2 | . 002E | < 003C | ( 0028 | + 002B | | 007C |
| 5x | & 0026 | | | | ¼ 00BC | | | | | ↓ 2193 | ! 0021 | $ 0024 | * 002A | ) 0029 | ; 003B | ¬ 00AC |
| 6x | - 002D | / 002F | ₍ 208D | ₎ 208E | ½ 00BD | ₌ 208C | ⁼ 207C | | | | | , 002C | % 0025 | _ 005F | > 003E | ? 003F |
| 7x | ₀ 2080 | ₁ 2081 | ₂ 2082 | ₃ 2083 | ₄ 2084 | ₅ 2085 | ₆ 2086 | ₇ 2087 | ₈ 2088 | ₉ 2089 | : 003A | # 0023 | @ 0040 | ' 0027 | = 003D | " 0022 |
| 8x | | a 0061 | b 0062 | c 0063 | d 0064 | e 0065 | f 0066 | g 0067 | h 0068 | i 0069 | ↑ 2191 | { 007B | ≤ 2264 | ⁽ 207D | ⁺ 207A | ┼ 253C |
| 9x | ₋ 208B | j 006A | k 006B | l 006C | m 006D | n 006E | o 006F | p 0070 | q 0071 | r 0072 | | } 007D | ⌑ 2311 | ⁾ 207E | ± 00B1 | ■ 25A0 |
| Ax | ⁻ 207B | ° 00B0 | s 0073 | t 0074 | u 0075 | v 0076 | w 0077 | x 0078 | y 0079 | z 007A | | └ 2514 | ┌ 250C | [ 005B | ≥ 2265 | • 2022 |
| Bx | ⁰ 2070 | ¹ 00B9 | ² 00B2 | ³ 00B3 | ⁴ 2074 | ⁵ 2075 | ⁶ 2076 | ⁷ 2077 | ⁸ 2078 | ⁹ 2079 | | ┘ 2518 | ┐ 2510 | ] 005D | ≠ 2260 | ─ 2500 |
| Cx | | A 0041 | B 0042 | C 0043 | D 0044 | E 0045 | F 0046 | G 0047 | H 0048 | I 0049 | SHY | ┴ 2534 | ┬ 252C | | | |
| Dx | | J 004A | K 004B | L 004C | M 004D | N 004E | O 004F | P 0050 | Q 0051 | R 0052 | | | § 00A7 | ¶ 00B6 | ← 2190 | → 2192 |
| Ex | \ 005C | ₊ 208A | S 0053 | T 0054 | U 0055 | V 0056 | W 0057 | X 0058 | Y 0059 | Z 005A | | ├ 251C | ┤ 2524 | | | |
| Fx | 0 0030 | 1 0031 | 2 0032 | 3 0033 | 4 0034 | 5 0035 | 6 0036 | 7 0037 | 8 0038 | 9 0039 | │ 2502 | | | | | EO |
| Differences from EBCDIC 037 |||||||||||||||||

## References

* ↑ "Codepages". Archived from the original on 2012-07-16.
* ↑ "Code Page 264" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-01-21.
# Character Encodings/Code Tables/EBCDIC/EBCDIC 274

IBM code page 274 (CCSID 274) is an EBCDIC code page with the full Latin-1-charset support used in IBM mainframes in Belgium.
An older version is code page 1072.

## Codepage layout

Characters are shown with their equivalent Unicode codes.
EBCDIC 274 :
| | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | A | B | C | D | E | F |
| 0x | NUL | SOH | STX | ETX | SEL | HT | RNL | DEL | GE | SPS | RPT | VT | FF | CR | SO | SI |
| 1x | DLE | DC1 | DC2 | DC3 | RES/ ENP | NL | BS | POC | CAN | EM | UBS | CU1 | IFS | IGS | IRS | ITB |
| 2x | DS | SOS | FS | WUS | BYP/ INP | LF | ETB | ESC | SA | SFE | SM/ SW | CSP | MFA | ENQ | ACK | BEL |
| 3x | | | SYN | IR | PP | TRN | NBS | EOT | SBS | IT | RFF | CU3 | DC4 | NAK | | SUB |
| 4x | SP | NBSP | â 00E2 | ä 00E4 | @ 0040 | á 00E1 | ã 00E3 | å 00E5 | \ 005C | ñ 00F1 | [ 005B | . 002E | < 003C | ( 0028 | + 002B | ! 0021 |
| 5x | & 0026 | { 007B | ê 00EA | ë 00EB | } 007D | í 00ED | î 00EE | ï 00EF | ì 00EC | ß 00DF | ] 005D | $ 0024 | * 002A | ) 0029 | ; 003B | ^ 005E |
| 6x | - 002D | / 002F | Â 00C2 | Ä 00C4 | À 00C0 | Á 00C1 | Ã 00C3 | Å 00C5 | Ç 00C7 | Ñ 00D1 | ù 00F9 | , 002C | % 0025 | _ 005F | > 003E | ? 003F |
| 7x | ø 00F8 | É 00C9 | Ê 00CA | Ë 00CB | È 00C8 | Í 00CD | Î 00CE | Ï 00CF | Ì 00CC | ` 0060 | : 003A | # 0023 | à 00E0 | ' 0027 | = 003D | " 0022 |
| 8x | Ø 00D8 | a 0061 | b 0062 | c 0063 | d 0064 | e 0065 | f 0066 | g 0067 | h 0068 | i 0069 | « 00AB | » 00BB | ð 00F0 | ý 00FD | þ 00FE | ± 00B1 |
| 9x | ° 00B0 | j 006A | k 006B | l 006C | m 006D | n 006E | o 006F | p 0070 | q 0071 | r 0072 | ª 00AA | º 00BA | æ 00E6 | ¸ 00B8 | Æ 00C6 | ¤ 00A4 |
| Ax | µ 00B5 | ¨ 00A8 | s 0073 | t 0074 | u 0075 | v 0076 | w 0077 | x 0078 | y 0079 | z 007A | ¡ 00A1 | ¿ 00BF | Ð 00D0 | Ý 00DD | Þ 00DE | ® 00AE |
| Bx | ¢ 00A2 | £ 00A3 | ¥ 00A5 | · 00B7 | © 00A9 | § 00A7 | ¶ 00B6 | ¼ 00BC | ½ 00BD | ¾ 00BE | ¬ 00AC | | 007C | ¯ 00AF | ~ 007E | ´ 00B4 | × 00D7 |
| Cx | é 00E9 | A 0041 | B 0042 | C 0043 | D 0044 | E 0045 | F 0046 | G 0047 | H 0048 | I 0049 | SHY | ô 00F4 | ö 00F6 | ò 00F2 | ó 00F3 | õ 00F5 |
| Dx | è 00E8 | J 004A | K 004B | L 004C | M 004D | N 004E | O 004F | P 0050 | Q 0051 | R 0052 | ¹ 00B9 | û 00FB | ü 00FC | ¦ 00A6 | ú 00FA | ÿ 00FF |
| Ex | ç 00E7 | ÷ 00F7 | S 0053 | T 0054 | U 0055 | V 0056 | W 0057 | X 0058 | Y 0059 | Z 005A | ² 00B2 | Ô 00D4 | Ö 00D6 | Ò 00D2 | Ó 00D3 | Õ 00D5 |
| Fx | 0 0030 | 1 0031 | 2 0032 | 3 0033 | 4 0034 | 5 0035 | 6 0036 | 7 0037 | 8 0038 | 9 0039 | ³ 00B3 | Û 00DB | Ü 00DC | Ù 00D9 | Ú 00DA | EO |
| Differences from EBCDIC 500 |||||||||||||||||

## References

* ↑ "CCSID 274 information document". Archived from the original on 2016-03-26.
* ↑ "Code page 274 information document". Archived from the original on 2016-03-17.
* ↑ Code Page CPGID 00274 (pdf) (PDF), IBM
* ↑ Code Page CPGID 00274 (txt), IBM