# Conductance (graph theory)

Part of a series on :
Network science :
Theory :
Graph
Complex network
Contagion
Small-world
Scale-free
Community structure
Percolation
Evolution
Controllability
Graph drawing
Social capital
Link analysis
Optimization
Reciprocity
Closure
Homophily
Transitivity
Preferential attachment
Balance theory
Network effect
Social influence :
Network types :
Informational (computing)
Telecommunication
Transport
Social
Scientific collaboration
Biological
Artificial neural
Interdependent
Semantic
Spatial
Dependency
Flow
on-Chip :
Graphs :
MetricsAlgorithms :
Centrality
Degree
Motif
Clustering
Degree distribution
Assortativity
Distance
Modularity
Efficiency :
Models :
ListsCategories :
Topics
Software
Network scientists
Category:Network theory
Category:Graph theory :
vte :
In theoretical computer science, graph theory, and mathematics, the conductance is a parameter of a Markov chain that is closely tied to its mixing time, that is, how rapidly the chain converges to its stationary distribution, should it exist. Equivalently, the conductance can be viewed as a parameter of a directed graph, in which case it can be used to analyze how quickly random walks in the graph converge.
The conductance of a graph is closely related to the Cheeger constant of the graph, which is also known as the edge expansion or the isoperimetic number. However, due to subtly different definitions, the conductance and the edge expansion do not generally coincide if the graphs are not regular. On the other hand, the notion of electrical conductance that appears in electrical networks is unrelated to the conductance of a graph.

## History

The conductance was first defined by Mark Jerrum and Alistair Sinclair in 1988 to prove that the permanent of a matrix with entries from {0,1} has a polynomial-time approximation scheme. In the proof, Jerrum and Sinclair studied the Markov chain that switches between perfect and near-perfect matchings in bipartite graphs by adding or removing individual edges. They defined and used the conductance to prove that this Markov chain is rapidly mixing. This means that, after running the Markov chain for a polynomial number of steps, the resulting distribution is guaranteed to be close to the stationary distribution, which in this case is the uniform distribution on the set of all perfect and near-perfect matchings. This rapidly mixing Markov chain makes it possible in polynomial time to draw approximately uniform random samples from the set of all perfect matchings in the bipartite graph, which in turn gives rise to the polynomial-time approximation scheme for computing the permanent.

## Definition

For undirected d-regular graphs $G$ without edge weights, the conductance $\varphi (G)$ is equal to the Cheeger constant $h(G)$ divided by d, that is, we have $\varphi (G)=h(G)/d$.
More generally, let $G$ be a directed graph with $n$ vertices, vertex set $V$, edge set $E$, and real weights $a_{ij}\geq 0$ on each edge $ij\in E$. Let $S\subseteq V$ be any vertex subset. The conductance $\varphi (S)$ of the cut $(S,{\bar {S}})$ is defined via$\varphi (S)={\frac {\displaystyle a(S,{\bar {S}})}{\min(\mathrm {vol} (S),\mathrm {vol} ({\bar {S}}))}}\,,$where$a(S,T)=\sum _{i\in S}\sum _{j\in T}a_{ij}\,,$and so $a(S,{\bar {S}})$ is the total weight of all edges that are crossing the cut from $S$ to ${\bar {S}}$ and$\mathrm {vol} (S)=a(S,V)=\sum _{i\in S}\sum _{j\in V}a_{ij}$is the volume of $S$, that is, the total weight of all edges that start at $S$. If $\mathrm {vol} (S)$ equals $0$, then $a(S,{\bar {S}})$ also equals $0$ and $\varphi (S)$ is defined as $1$.
The conductance $\varphi (G)$ of the graph $G$ is now defined as the minimum conductance over all possible cuts:$\varphi (G)=\min _{S\subseteq V}\varphi (S).$Equivalently, the conductance satisfies$\varphi (G)=\min \left\{{\frac {a(S,{\bar {S}})}{\mathrm {vol} (S)}}\;\colon \;{\mathrm {vol} (S)\leq {\frac {\mathrm {vol} (V)}{2}}}\right\}\,.$

## Generalizations and applications

In practical applications, one often considers the conductance only over a cut. A common generalization of conductance is to handle the case of weights assigned to the edges: then the weights are added; if the weight is in the form of a resistance, then the reciprocal weights are added.
The notion of conductance underpins the study of percolation in physics and other applied areas; thus, for example, the permeability of petroleum through porous rock can be modeled in terms of the conductance of a graph, with weights given by pore sizes.
Conductance also helps measure the quality of a Spectral clustering. The maximum among the conductance of clusters provides a bound which can be used, along with inter-cluster edge weight, to define a measure on the quality of clustering. Intuitively, the conductance of a cluster (which can be seen as a set of vertices in a graph) should be low. Apart from this, the conductance of the subgraph induced by a cluster (called "internal conductance") can be used as well.

## Markov chains

For an ergodic reversible Markov chain with an underlying graph G, the conductance is a way to measure how hard it is to leave a small set of nodes. Formally, the conductance of a graph is defined as the minimum over all sets $S$ of the capacity of $S$ divided by the ergodic flow out of $S$. Alistair Sinclair showed that conductance is closely tied to mixing time in ergodic reversible Markov chains. We can also view conductance in a more probabilistic way, as the probability of leaving a set of nodes given that we started in that set to begin with. This may also be written as
    $\Phi =\min _{S\subseteq V,0<\pi (S)\leq {\frac {1}{2}}}\Phi _{S}=\min _{S\subseteq V,0<\pi (S)\leq {\frac {1}{2}}}{\frac {\sum _{x\in S,y\in {\bar {S}}}\pi (x)P(x,y)}{\pi (S)}},$
where $\pi$ is the stationary distribution of the chain. In some literature, this quantity is also called the bottleneck ratio of G.
Conductance is related to Markov chain mixing time in the reversible setting. Precisely, for any irreducible, reversible Markov Chain with self loop probabilities $P(y,y)\geq 1/2$ for all states $y$ and an initial state $x\in \Omega$,
    ${\frac {1}{4\Phi }}\leq \tau _{x}(\delta )\leq {\frac {2}{\Phi ^{2}}}{\big\ln \pi (x)^{-1}+\ln \delta ^{-1}{\big )}$.