# Electoral reform in Colorado

Elections in Colorado :
Federal government
Presidential elections
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Presidential caucuses and primaries
Democratic
2000
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Republican
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
U.S. Senate elections
1876
1879
1883 sp
1885
1889
1891
1895
1897
1901
1903
1907
1909
1913
1913 sp
1914
1918
1920
1924
1924 sp
1926
1930
1932
1932 sp
1936
1938
1942
1942 sp
1944
1948
1950
1954
1956
1960
1962
1966
1968
1972
1974
1978
1980
1984
1986
1990
1992
1996
1998
2002
2004
2008
2010
2014
2016
2020
2022
2026
2028
U.S. House of Representatives elections
1876
1878
1880
1882
1884
1886
1888
1890
1892
1894
1896
1898
1900
1902
1904
1906
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
1920
1922
1924
1926
1927
1st sp
1928
1930
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
3rd sp
1941
4th sp
1942
1944
1st sp
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1983
6th sp
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
4th sp :
State government
General elections
2010
2014
2018
2020
2022
Gubernatorial elections
1876
1878
1880
1882
1884
1886
1888
1890
1894
1896
1898
1900
1902
1904
1906
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
1920
1922
1924
1926
1928
1930
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
1942
1944
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1962
1966
1970
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
2026
Secretary of State elections
2022
Attorney General elections
2014
2018
2022
Treasurer elections
2022
Colorado State Board of Regent elections
2016
Senate elections
2013 (recall)
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
House of Representatives elections
2018
2020
2022
2024 :
Ballot measures
List of Colorado ballot measures
2004
36
2006
38
41
42
43
44
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
2008
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
54
58
59
L
2010
62
2012
64
2018
A
2020
B
C
EE
113
114
2022
125
126
FF
2023
HH
II
2024
79
J
131 :
Colorado Springs
Local elections
2019
Mayoral elections
1995
1997 sp
1999
2003
2007
2011
2015
2019
2023 :
Denver
Mayoral elections
2003
2007
2011
2015
2019
2023 :
El Paso County
Local elections
2018 :
Pueblo
Mayoral elections
2023–24 :
vte :
Electoral reform in Colorado refers to efforts to change the voting laws in the Centennial State.

## National Popular Vote

In 2006, the Colorado Senate passed a bill to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact but it failed in the Colorado House of Representatives.
On 17 March 2009, the Colorado House of Representatives passed legislation to allocate Colorado's electoral votes to the winner of the nationwide popular vote. The legislation faced criticism from Republican lawmakers and never passed the state Senate.
During the 2019 Regular Session of the Colorado General Assembly, the General Assembly and Governor Jared Polis signed passed the National Popular Vote Act. This legislation added Colorado to the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. Following Governor Polis's enactment of the legislation, opponents gathered nearly 229,000 signatures to place the issue on the 2020 ballot.

## Ranked-choice voting

In response to the 2020 Democratic Primary, Democratic leaders in the Colorado General Assembly and the Colorado Secretary of State Griswold expressed interest in considering ranked-choice voting (RCV) at the state level. Secretary Griswold has also established a committee to consider new election methods. Any statewide changes to the elections process would have to be approved by the legislature or by voter approval. In response to the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries, lawmakers began discussions about RCV (specifically the instant-runoff voting method), with some academics expressing concerns about "wasted votes" for candidates who terminated their candidacy after voters began casting their ballots through early voting and mail-in voting. Colorado State Senator Julie Gonzales expressed interest in establishing RCV in Colorado through the General Assembly.
In February 2020, a potential ballot initiative was filed with the state of Colorado to establish ranked-choice voting for U.S. House of Representatives races.
In 2008, Telluride began using RCV but ceased the process after their November 2019 mayoral election due to concerns over the time-intensive hand-counting method for tallying RCV results.
In 2007, the Aspen City Council voted 5-0 to place a measure on the ballot to implement RCV in elections. Aspen voters changed their mind in 2010 and repealed the measure by a large margin.
Carbondale and Basalt both use RCV for mayoral races with three or more candidates.

### Proposition 131 (2024)

On November 5, 2024 Colorado voters will have the choice to implement ranked choice voting in the state or continue using first past the post. If the proposition is approved by voters, Colorado will join Alaska and Maine in using ranked choice voting for elections to the U.S. Senate, U.S. House of Representatives, Governor, Attorney General, Secretary of State, Treasurer, CU Board of Regents, State Board of Education, and the Colorado General Assembly.

## Amendments and Ballot Initiatives
### Amendment 36 (2004)

2004's Amendment 36, if enacted, would have theoretically allowed a third party candidate to receive an electoral vote if they received 12% of the popular vote in Colorado. Opponents harbored concerns that the amendment, if adopted, could affect the outcome of the 2004 U.S. Presidential election. Regardless, the outcome of the election would not have been affected by the adoption of the amendment since none of the third party candidates achieved even 1% of the popular vote. The amendment failed by a large margin.

### Initiative 104 (2020)

Initiative 104, which may be considered during Colorado's 2020 election, would establish approval voting for state elections in Colorado. Specifically, Initiative 104 would permit electors "to select as many choices as there are candidates" on a state ballot. This would modify existing state law, which only allows voters to select a single candidate. The initiative is currently "Approved for circulation" by the Secretary of State's office; it has not yet met the signature requirements to be on the 2020 ballot.
The ballot title for the initiative is:
   A change to the Colorado Revised Statutes adopting approval voting, a voting method in which electors may cast votes for multiple candidates in each race in all state and local elections and the winner in each race is the candidate or, in the case of a multiple-seat race, candidates, receiving the highest number of votes cast.
If passed by Colorado voters, Initiative 104 would go into effect on 1 January 2022.

## Redistricting
### Amendments Y and Z

On 6 November 2018, Colorado voters approved two ballot initiatives to establish independent commissions for redrawing districts. Amendment Y established the Colorado Independent Congressional Redistricting Commission to draw U.S. Congressional Districts. Amendment Z established the Colorado Independent Legislative Redistricting Commission to draw state legislative boundaries. The umbrella organization overseeing the two commissions is called the Colorado Independent Redistricting Commissions. Both amendments prioritize competitiveness when redistricting and both passed with 71 percent of the vote.
The commissions are made up of the following members:
* 4 members of the state's largest political party
* 4 members of the state's second largest political party
* 4 members whom are not members of any political party
8 of 12 members (two of whom must not be affiliated with a political party) are required to approve a redistricting map. A panel of retired judges and a lottery system are used to choose members of the commission, which must have representation from every congressional district in the state. The commissions drew districts for the first time after the 2020 Census.

### Colorado Reapportionment Commission

Prior to the passage of Amendments X and Y, Colorado's Reapportionment Commission drew legislative districts in the state. The Commission had 11 members with no explicit partisan makeup. The commission could have had up to 11 members of one political party.