# P-adically closed field

In mathematics, a p-adically closed field is a field that enjoys a closure property that is a close analogue for p-adic fields to what real closure is to the real field. They were introduced by James Ax and Simon B. Kochen in 1965.

## Definition

Let $K$ be the field $\mathbb {Q}$ of rational numbers and $v$ be its usual $p$-adic valuation (with $v(p)=1$). If $F$ is a (not necessarily algebraic) extension field of $K$, itself equipped with a valuation $w$, we say that $(F,w)$ is formally p-adic when the following conditions are satisfied:
* $w$ extends $v$ (that is, $w(x)=v(x)$ for all $x\in K$),
* the residue field of $w$ coincides with the residue field of $v$ (the residue field being the quotient of the valuation ring $\{x\in F:w(x)\geq 0\}$ by its maximal ideal $\{x\in F:w(x)>0\}$),
* the smallest positive value of $w$ coincides with the smallest positive value of $v$ (namely 1, since v was assumed to be normalized): in other words, a uniformizer for $K$ remains a uniformizer for $F$.
(Note that the value group of K may be larger than that of F since it may contain infinitely large elements over the latter.)
The formally p-adic fields can be viewed as an analogue of the formally real fields.
For example, the field $\mathbb {Q}$(i) of Gaussian rationals, if equipped with the valuation w given by $w(2+i)=1$ (and $w(2-i)=0$) is formally 5-adic (the place v=5 of the rationals splits in two places of the Gaussian rationals since $X^{2}+1$ factors over the residue field with 5 elements, and w is one of these places). The field of 5-adic numbers (which contains both the rationals and the Gaussian rationals embedded as per the place w) is also formally 5-adic. On the other hand, the field of Gaussian rationals is not formally 3-adic for any valuation, because the only valuation w on it which extends the 3-adic valuation is given by $w(3)=1$ and its residue field has 9 elements.
When F is formally p-adic but that there does not exist any proper algebraic formally p-adic extension of F, then F is said to be p-adically closed. For example, the field of p-adic numbers is p-adically closed, and so is the algebraic closure of the rationals inside it (the field of p-adic algebraic numbers).
If F is p-adically closed, then:
* there is a unique valuation w on F which makes F p-adically closed (so it is legitimate to say that F, rather than the pair $(F,w)$, is p-adically closed),
* F is Henselian with respect to this place (that is, its valuation ring is so),
* the valuation ring of F is exactly the image of the Kochen operator (see below),
* the value group of F is an extension by $\mathbb {Z}$ (the value group of K) of a divisible group, with the lexicographical order.
The first statement is an analogue of the fact that the order of a real-closed field is uniquely determined by the algebraic structure.
The definitions given above can be copied to a more general context: if K is a field equipped with a valuation v such that
* the residue field of K is finite (call q its cardinal and p its characteristic),
* the value group of v admits a smallest positive element (call it 1, and say π is a uniformizer, i.e. $v(\pi )=1$),
* K has finite absolute ramification, i.e., $v(p)$ is finite (that is, a finite multiple of $v(\pi )=1$),
(these hypotheses are satisfied for the field of rationals, with q=π=p the prime number having valuation 1) then we can speak of formally v-adic fields (or ${\mathfrak {p}}$-adic if ${\mathfrak {p}}$ is the ideal corresponding to v) and v-adically complete fields.

## The Kochen operator

If K is a field equipped with a valuation v satisfying the hypothesis and with the notations introduced in the previous paragraph, define the Kochen operator by:
    $\gamma (z)={\frac {1}{\pi }}\,{\frac {z^{q}-z}{(z^{q}-z)^{2}-1}}$
(when $z^{q}-z\neq \pm 1$). It is easy to check that $\gamma (z)$ always has non-negative valuation. The Kochen operator can be thought of as a p-adic (or v-adic) analogue of the square function in the real case.
An extension field F of K is formally v-adic if and only if ${\frac {1}{\pi }}$ does not belong to the subring generated over the value ring of K by the image of the Kochen operator on F. This is an analogue of the statement (or definition) that a field is formally real when $-1$ is not a sum of squares.

## First-order theory

The first-order theory of p-adically closed fields (here we are restricting ourselves to the p-adic case, i.e., K is the field of rationals and v is the p-adic valuation) is complete and model complete, and if we slightly enrich the language it admits quantifier elimination. Thus, one can define p-adically closed fields as those whose first-order theory is elementarily equivalent to that of $\mathbb {Q} _{p}$.