# 2016 Maine Question 1

Elections in Maine :
Federal offices
U.S. President
1820
1824
1828
1832
1836
1840
1844
1848
1852
1856
1860
1864
1868
1872
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
Dem
1988
1992
1996
2000
Dem
2004
Dem
2008
Dem
Rep
2012
Rep
2016
Dem
Rep
2020
Dem
Rep
2024
Dem
Rep
U.S. Senate
1820
1821
1823
1823
1827
1829 sp
1835
1835 sp
1837 sp
1839
1840
1843 sp
1846
1848 sp
1851
1854 sp
1857
1857 sp
1859
1861 sp
1863
1865 sp
1869
1870 sp
1875
1877
1877 sp
1880
1881
1881 sp
1883
1887
1889
1893
1895
1899
1901
1905
1907
1911
1912 sp
1913
1916
1916 sp
1918
1922
1924
1926 sp
1928
1930
1934
1936
1940
1942
1946
1948
1952
1954
1958
1960
1964
1966
1970
1972
1976
1978
1982
1984
1988
1990
1994
1996
2000
2002
2006
2008
2012
2014
2018
2020
2024
U.S. House of Representatives
1820–1821
1822 sp 2nd
1823
1824–1825
1826–1827
1826 sp 5th
1827 sp 1st
1828–1830
1830
1833
1834
1836
1838
1840
1843
1844
1846
1848
1850
1852
1854
1856
1858
1860
1860 sp 5th
1862
1864
1866
1868
1870
1872
1874
1876
1878
1880
1881 sp 2nd
1882
1884
1886
1888
1890
1892
1894
1896
1897 sp 3rd
1898
1899 sp 1st
1899 sp 2nd
1900
1901 sp 4th
1902
1904
1906
1908
1908 sp 2nd
1908 sp 4th
1910
1912
1913 sp 3rd
1914
1916
1918
1920
1922
1924
1926
1928
1930
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
1940 sp 2nd
1942
1944
1946
1948
1950
1951 sp 3rd
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024 :
State government
Gubernatorial elections
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1860
1861
1862
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
1876
1877
1878
1879
1880
1882
1884
1886
1888
1890
1892
1894
1896
1898
1900
1902
1904
1906
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
1920
1922
1924
1926
1928
1930
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
1942
1944
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1966
1970
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
State Senate elections
2016
2018
2020
2022
State House elections
2016
2018
2020
2022 :
Ballot measures
People's vetoes
2009Question 1
2011Question 1
2018Question 1 (Jun)
2020Question 1
Citizen initiated referendums
2012Question 1
2014Question 1
2015Question 1
2016
Question 1
Question 2
Question 3
Question 4
Question 5
2017
Question 1
Question 2
2018
Question 1 (Nov)
2021
Question 1
2023
Question 1
Constitutional amendments
2021
Question 3
Legislatively referred referendums
2024
Question 5 :
City of Portland
Mayoral elections
2011
2015
2019
2023 :
vte :
Maine Question 1, formally An Act to Legalize Marijuana, is a citizen-initiated referendum question that qualified for the Maine November 8, 2016 statewide ballot. It was qualified for the ballot after a Maine Superior Court judge ordered that petitions rejected by the Maine Secretary of State be reconsidered. The proposal sought to legalize the recreational use of marijuana in Maine for those over the age of 21, and institute a 10 percent tax on its sale. As the Maine Legislature and Governor Paul LePage declined to enact the proposal as written, it appeared on the ballot along with elections for President of the United States, Maine's two U.S. House seats, the Legislature, other statewide ballot questions, and various local elections.
According to uncertified results, the referendum passed by 50.3% to 49.7%, a margin of under 5,000 votes. On November 10, two days after the election, the Associated Press called the result in favor of the "Yes" vote. However, opponents of the measure requested a recount and then withdrew their request on December 17.
After the partially completed recount, the results were certified as 381,768 in favor and 377,773 opposed. As of 2024, Question 1's results remain the narrowest margin of victory for any successful marijuana legalization measure in U.S. history.

## Background

The passage of ballot measures in Colorado and Washington in 2012 which legalize marijuana has led to efforts across the United States to do so. The use of marijuana for medical purposes has been legal in Maine since 1999. Attempts by the Maine Legislature to legalize recreational marijuana have not succeeded, including one effort to put the question directly onto the ballot. Some success in legalization has been seen at the local level, with Portland legalizing recreational use in 2013 by a wide margin. It has also been legalized in South Portland but a legalization effort in Lewiston failed.
Petitions for two separate groups to collect signatures to place a ballot measure on the 2016 ballot were issued by the Maine Secretary of State's Office, one on April 28, 2015 to a group called Legalize Maine, and another on June 3, 2016 to the Campaign to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol, which is affiliated with the Marijuana Policy Project. The two proposals were similar but Legalize Maine's was more permissible, legalizing up to 2.5 oz. for use by those 21 and older, as opposed to only 1 oz. under the MPP's proposal. It also called for a 10 percent tax on marijuana. Legalize Maine promoted their proposal as "home grown". The two groups agreed to combine their efforts on October 26, 2015 and coalesce behind Legalize Maine's proposal, so that there would only be one legalization effort. An effort by State Rep. Mark Dion (D-Portland) to pass a bill legalizing marijuana failed on June 22, 2015, largely because legislators did not want to undercut the petition gathering effort. Dion had felt that the Legislature should get out in front on this issue to avoid having to fix a poorly written referendum proposal later.
Supporters of legalization turned in 99,929 signatures to Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap on February 1, 2016. A small group protested those delivering the signatures outside the Secretary's Office, objecting to out of state groups being involved in the legalization effort.

### Status of petitions

Dunlap announced on March 2, 2016 that the petition gathering effort had failed and the issue did not qualify for the ballot. He stated that his office could only validate 51,543 signatures, well below the 61,123 required to get to the ballot. 13,525 signatures were rejected as not belonging to registered Maine voters, and a smaller number was rejected for various other errors. The largest number of signatures rejected, 31,338, was due to signatures of a notary public and petition circulators who signed the oaths on the petitions not matching those on file with the Secretary of State's Office. Dunlap stated that "We’re not saying any malfeasance was or wasn’t done, that’s not up to us to determine. Our goal isn’t to invalidate signatures. The goal is to make sure they are valid." Supporters immediately announced that they would appeal the decision to Maine Superior Court, stating that "we sincerely hope that 17,000-plus Maine citizens will not be disenfranchised due to a handwriting technicality."
One of the notaries in question, Stavros Mendros, publicly stated that he had signed the petitions but that given the sheer volume of papers he had to sign in a short amount of time, which he claimed was almost 15,000 papers, it would be almost impossible for him to write his signature exactly the same each time. The Portland Press Herald obtained copies of petitions and sent them to independent handwriting experts who stated that in their opinion the signatures were all within natural variations in handwriting and were likely from the same person. Supporters also criticized Dunlap's office for not using handwriting experts or discussing their concerns with supporters to validate the signatures.
Judge Michaela Murphy ruled on April 8, 2016 that the rejected petitions should be reinstated for consideration. In her opinion, Murphy stated that Dunlap had committed an error of law by applying an "overly burdensome" interpretation of the law. Murphy explained that signatures gathering and oath administration are often done under less than ideal conditions and that requiring perfect signature reproduction on each form signed was unreasonable. Dunlap announced on April 13 that he had declined to appeal the decision and would begin re-reviewing the previously rejected petitions.
Dunlap announced on April 27 that about 11,000 previously invalidated signatures were found to be valid, which meant that the referendum qualified for the ballot. The proposal went to the Legislature for consideration, but they declined to approve it and sent it to the ballot. The question will appear on the ballot as "Do you want to allow the possession and use of marijuana under state law by persons who are at least 21 years of age, and allow the cultivation, manufacture, distribution, testing, and sale of marijuana and marijuana products subject to state regulation, taxation and local ordinance?"

## Campaign

Maine Attorney General Janet Mills expressed concern that the law as written would legalize marijuana use for all ages, calling the language of the bill "troublesome".

### Notable endorsements
#### Supporters

* ACLU of Maine
* Marijuana Policy Project
* Eric Brakey, Republican State Senator
* Mark Dion, State Representative (D-Portland), former Cumberland County Sheriff
* David Miramant, Democratic State Senator
* Diane Russell, State Representative (D-Portland)
* Ryan Fecteau, State Representative (D-Biddeford)
* Brian Hubbell, State Representative (D-Bar Harbor)
* Larry Dunphy, State Representative (I-Embden)
* Matt Moonen, State Representative (D-Portland)
* Deane Rykerson, State Representative (D-Kittery)
* Scott Hamman, State Representative (D-South Portland)
* Peter Stucky, State Representative (D-Portland)
* MaineToday Media newspapers; Portland Press Herald, Kennebec Journal, Morning Sentinel

#### Opponents

* American Automobile Association
* Paul LePage, Governor of Maine
* Walt Whitcomb, Commissioner of the Maine Department of Agriculture
* Smart Approaches to Marijuana
* Maine Public Health Association
* Maine Hospital Association
* Maine Medical Association
* Maine Association of School Nurses
* Maine State Chamber of Commerce
* Alliance for Addiction and Mental Health Services, Maine
* National Alliance on Mental Illness Maine
* Maine Chiefs of Police Association
* Bangor Region Chamber of Commerce
* Maine State Police
* Aroostook Substance Abuse Prevention
* Cumberland County Sheriffs Office
* Yarmouth Police Department
* Cumberland Police Department
* Concerned Women for America of Maine
* Falmouth Police Department
* Christian Civic League of Maine
* Dixfield Police Department
* Bangor Daily News
* Ellsworth American

## Public opinion

Public opinion on the legalization of recreational marijuana in Maine :
| Poll source | Date(s) administered | Sample size | Margin of error | % support | % opposition | % Undecided/Don't Know |
| Portland Press Herald/UNH Survey Center | October 20–25, 2016 | 663 LV | ± 3.8% | 50% | 41% | 9% |
| Portland Press Herald/UNH Survey Center | September 15–20, 2016 | 505 LV | ± 4.3% | 53% | 38% | 9% |
| Maine People's Resource Center | March 5–8, 2016 | 557 LV | ± 4.15% | 54% | 42% | 4% |
| Critical Insights | March 4–10, 2016 | 610 AV | N/A | 55% | 41% | 4% |

## Recount

On 5 December 2016 the state of Maine called for an official recount of the ballots regarding Question 1, a process expected to take a month or more and cost up to $500,000. The International Business Times reported that governor Paul LePage said:
   ... he would be taking up the issue with president-elect Donald Trump to find out if the incoming administration would enforce federal laws prohibiting legal marijuana use. However, if Trump decides to keep cannabis laws at the state level, LePage said he would accept the law.
By December 16, around 30% of all ballots cast had been recounted, including those from Maine's largest city of Portland without any notable change in the results. The recount was ordered suspended until after January 1, and the No on 1 campaign filled out the requisite paperwork to formally cancel the recount one day later.

## Results
### Election night

Question 1 Election Night Results :
| Choice | Votes | % |
| Yes | 381,692 | 50.27 |
| No | 377,619 | 49.73 |
| Total votes | 759,311 | 100.00 |
| Registered voters/turnout | 1,058,444 | 71.74 |

### After recount

Question 1 Results after Partial Recount :
| County | Yes | Votes | No | Votes |
| Androscoggin | 48.37% | 27,374 | 51.63% | 29,217 |
| Aroostook | 36.72% | 13,015 | 63.28% | 22,433 |
| Cumberland | 55.21% | 96,146 | 44.79% | 78,014 |
| Franklin | 50.46% | 8,523 | 49.54% | 8,366 |
| Hancock | 50.59% | 16,476 | 49.41% | 16,090 |
| Kennebec | 46.45% | 31,186 | 53.55% | 35,960 |
| Knox | 51.88% | 12,162 | 48.12% | 11,281 |
| Lincoln | 49.68% | 10,870 | 50.32% | 11,009 |
| Oxford | 50.21% | 16,028 | 49.79% | 15,897 |
| Penobscot | 45.64% | 37,330 | 54.36% | 44,466 |
| Piscataquis | 44.26% | 4,150 | 55.74% | 5,226 |
| Sagadahoc | 52.82% | 11,660 | 47.18% | 10,413 |
| Somerset | 45.80% | 12,120 | 54.20% | 14,345 |
| Waldo | 48.35% | 11,129 | 51.65% | 11,889 |
| Washington | 47.80% | 8,003 | 52.20% | 8,739 |
| York | 54.04% | 62,824 | 45.96% | 53,438 |
| UOCAVA | 73.68% | 2,772 | 26.32% | 990 |
| Total | 50.26% | 381,768 | 49.74% | 377,773 |