# 1900 United States presidential election in North Carolina

Elections in North Carolina :
Federal government
U.S. President
1792
1796
1800
1804
1808
1812
1816
1820
1824
1828
1832
1836
1840
1844
1848
1852
1856
1860
1868
1872
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
Dem
Rep
2012
2016
Dem
2020
Dem
Rep
2024
Dem
Rep
U.S. Senate
1789
1792
1795
1798
1799
1800
1804
1805 (sp)
1806
1810
1812
1814 (sp)
1815 (sp)
1816
1816 (sp)
1818
1822
1825
1846 (sp)
1828
1828 (sp)
1829
1829 (sp)
1830
1835
1836
1836 (sp)
1840 (sp)
1841
1843
1847
1849
1854 (sp)
1855
1858 (sp)
1861
1868
1872
1872 (sp)
1876
1879
1883
1884
1889
1890
1894
1894 (sp)
1897
1901
1903
1907
1909
1913
1914
1918
1920
1924
1926
1930
1932
1932 (sp)
1936
1938
1942
1944
1948
1948 (sp)
1950
1950 (sp)
1954
1954 (sp)
1956
1958 (sp)
1960
1966
1968
1972
1974
1978
1980
1984
1986
1986 (sp)
1990
1992
1996
1998
2002
2004
2008
2010
2014
2016
2020
2022
2026
U.S. House of Representatives
1790
1791
1793
1795
sp:4
1796
sp:4
1798
sp:10
1800
1801
sp:8
1802
sp:8
1803
1804
1805
sp:5
1806
sp:10
1808
sp:7
1810
1813
sp:3
1815
1816
sp:6
sp:8
1817
1818
sp:7
sp:11
1819
1821
sp:4
1823
1825
sp:2
1826
sp:8
1827
1829
sp:5
sp:10
1831
1833
1835
1837
1839
1841
1843
1845
1847
1849
1851
1853
1855
1857
1858
sp:8
1859
1865
1868
1870
1872
1874
1876
1878
1880
1882
1884
1886
1888
1890
1892
1894
1896
1898
1900
1902
1904
1906
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
1920
1928
1930
1934
1938
1940
1942
1946
1948
1950
1952
1956
1958
1960
sp:12
1968
1972
1980
1984
1986
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
sp:1
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
sp:12
2016
2018
9
2019
sp:3
sp:9
2020
2022
2024 :
State executive
Gubernatorial elections
1803
1804
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1810
1812
1813
1814
1815
1816
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
1836
1838
1840
1842
1844
1846
1848
1850
1852
1854
1856
1858
1860
1862
1864
1865
1866
1868
1872
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Lieutenant Governor elections
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Attorney General elections
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Council of State elections
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Secretary of State elections
1940
1944
2024 :
State legislature
State Senate elections
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
State House elections
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024 :
State judiciary
Judicial elections
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024 :
Ballot measures
2012Amendment 1 :
Mayoral elections
Charlotte mayoral elections
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
2022
Cary mayoral elections
2011
2015
2019
2023
Durham mayoral elections
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
2021
2023
Fayetteville mayoral elections
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
2022
Greensboro mayoral elections
2011
2013
2015
2017
2022
Raleigh mayoral elections
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
2022
2024
Winston-Salem mayoral elections
1997
2001
2005
2009
2013
2016
2020 :
vte :
The 1900 United States presidential election in North Carolina took place on November 6, 1900. All contemporary 45 states were part of the 1900 United States presidential election. Voters chose 11 electors to the Electoral College, which selected the president and vice president.
In the period between this election and that of 1896, North Carolina had seen the overthrow of its Populist/Republican fusion government by white Democrats in the 1898 Wilmington coup d'état. Following this momentous event, the state would see a radical restructuring of its politics due to the disenfranchisement of its large African-American population, who had provided a substantial – but unlike many Deep South states not overwhelming – proportion of Republican Party support ever since that party first appeared in the state following Reconstruction.
At the same time, the state's Republican Party, now confined to the mountain and northwestern Piedmont areas that had resisted secession and viewed the Democratic Party as a “war party”, would turn almost overnight towards a “lily-white” strategy based on attempting to appeal to businessmen who found the Democratic Party too anti-business and too favorable to using of low-cost black labor instead of whites. The GOP had to some extent followed this strategy in the years before black disenfranchisement because it wanted to appeal to the state's budding industrialists, who were critical of Democratic policies favoring free trade over high tariffs.
Despite the radical changes in the electorate over this and the following election, there was relatively little change in the overall statewide vote in a rematch between Democrat William Jennings Bryan and incumbent Republican President McKinley. Although McKinley lost almost all the GOP's black belt support as its black voters could no longer vote (such as Northampton County, a majority black county which has not voted for a Republican presidential candidate since the 1896 election), he did make extensive gains in majority-white and formerly Democratic regions of the Piedmont and secessionist parts of the mountains. Consequently, thirty-four of the state's ninety-seven counties switched parties despite a minimal statewide vote share change. McKinley was the first Republican to carry Alexander County, Caldwell County, Graham County, Lincoln County, Macon County, Swain County and Yancey County in historically secessionist parts of the mountains and northwestern Piedmont, and also Orange County in the eastern Piedmont.
In addition, Republicans made strong and persistent gains in historically secessionist Sampson County, home of Populist Senator Marion Butler, a key architect of both the Populist-Republican fusion at the state level in North Carolina and the Populist-Democratic fusion at the national level in 1896 with Bryan's nomination. In 1896 Sampson County overwhelmingly voted for Bryan as the Populist fusion candidate, but with the backlash to the overthrow of the Populist-Republican fusion state government, Sampson County swung heavily to the Republican McKinley, as a 67.63%-30.82% Bryan lead over McKinley in 1896 became a 58.64%-36.82% victory for McKinley over Bryan in 1900. Sampson County would remain an isolated island of Republican support down east for decades.
Along with having defeated McKinley in North Carolina four years earlier, Bryan would later win the state again in 1908 against William Howard Taft.

## Results

1900 United States presidential election in North Carolina :
| Party | Party | Candidate | Votes | Percentage | Electoral votes |
| | Democratic | William Jennings Bryan | 157,733 | 53.92% | 11 |
| | Republican | William McKinley (incumbent) | 132,997 | 45.47% | 0 |
| | Prohibition | John G. Woolley | 990 | 0.34% | 0 |
| | Populist | Wharton Barker | 798 | 0.27% | 0 |
| Totals | Totals | Totals | 292,518 | 100.00% | 11 |
| Voter turnout | Voter turnout | Voter turnout | | | — |

### Results by county

1900 United States presidential election in North Carolina by county :
| County | William Jennings Bryan Democratic | William Jennings Bryan Democratic | William McKinley Republican | William McKinley Republican | John Granville Woolley Prohibition | John Granville Woolley Prohibition | Wharton Barker Populist | Wharton Barker Populist | Margin | Margin |
| County | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # |
| New Hanover | 97.40% | 2,247 | 2.60% | 60 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 94.80% | 2,187 |
| Scotland | 95.26% | 925 | 4.53% | 44 | 0.21% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 90.73% | 881 |
| Robeson | 74.14% | 3,280 | 25.86% | 1,144 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 48.28% | 2,136 |
| Anson | 73.24% | 1,856 | 26.56% | 673 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.20% | 5 | 46.69% | 1,183 |
| Richmond | 71.29% | 1,264 | 28.43% | 504 | 0.28% | 5 | 0.00% | 0 | 42.87% | 760 |
| Wilson | 70.19% | 2,816 | 29.76% | 1,194 | 0.05% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 40.43% | 1,622 |
| Bertie | 69.40% | 2,420 | 30.60% | 1,067 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 38.80% | 1,353 |
| Onslow | 68.14% | 1,322 | 31.86% | 618 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 36.29% | 704 |
| Currituck | 68.06% | 927 | 31.94% | 435 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 36.12% | 492 |
| Pender | 67.40% | 1,137 | 32.19% | 543 | 0.30% | 5 | 0.12% | 2 | 35.21% | 594 |
| Union | 66.89% | 1,790 | 32.29% | 864 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.82% | 22 | 34.60% | 926 |
| Gates | 66.61% | 1,125 | 33.39% | 564 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 33.21% | 561 |
| Nash | 66.04% | 2,600 | 33.96% | 1,337 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 32.08% | 1,263 |
| Edgecombe | 64.78% | 3,009 | 35.20% | 1,635 | 0.02% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 29.58% | 1,374 |
| Halifax | 64.73% | 3,990 | 35.27% | 2,174 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 29.46% | 1,816 |
| Hertford | 64.62% | 1,337 | 35.38% | 732 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 29.24% | 605 |
| Duplin | 63.05% | 1,879 | 36.28% | 1,081 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.67% | 20 | 26.78% | 798 |
| Franklin | 62.45% | 2,781 | 35.98% | 1,602 | 0.29% | 13 | 1.28% | 57 | 26.48% | 1,179 |
| Cleveland | 62.25% | 2,228 | 36.63% | 1,311 | 0.59% | 21 | 0.53% | 19 | 25.62% | 917 |
| Greene | 62.61% | 1,385 | 37.07% | 820 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.32% | 7 | 25.54% | 565 |
| Mecklenburg | 62.09% | 3,786 | 36.63% | 2,234 | 0.77% | 47 | 0.51% | 31 | 25.45% | 1,552 |
| Martin | 62.57% | 1,819 | 37.43% | 1,088 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 25.15% | 731 |
| Stanly | 61.50% | 1,265 | 38.50% | 792 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 22.99% | 473 |
| Lenoir | 61.34% | 1,942 | 38.66% | 1,224 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 22.68% | 718 |
| Johnston | 61.03% | 3,154 | 38.64% | 1,997 | 0.02% | 1 | 0.31% | 16 | 22.39% | 1,157 |
| Wayne | 60.79% | 3,104 | 38.48% | 1,965 | 0.72% | 37 | 0.00% | 0 | 22.31% | 1,139 |
| Rowan | 57.34% | 2,460 | 36.25% | 1,555 | 6.06% | 260 | 0.35% | 15 | 21.10% | 905 |
| Pitt | 59.82% | 3,264 | 39.52% | 2,156 | 0.27% | 15 | 0.38% | 21 | 20.31% | 1,108 |
| Granville | 58.80% | 2,288 | 40.79% | 1,587 | 0.05% | 2 | 0.36% | 14 | 18.02% | 701 |
| Vance | 56.98% | 1,233 | 40.71% | 881 | 0.09% | 2 | 2.22% | 48 | 16.27% | 352 |
| Haywood | 57.62% | 1,735 | 41.75% | 1,257 | 0.43% | 13 | 0.20% | 6 | 15.88% | 478 |
| Carteret | 57.57% | 1,046 | 42.21% | 767 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.22% | 4 | 15.35% | 279 |
| Craven | 57.45% | 2,028 | 42.55% | 1,502 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 14.90% | 526 |
| Cabarrus | 56.29% | 1,485 | 42.15% | 1,112 | 0.61% | 16 | 0.95% | 25 | 14.14% | 373 |
| Columbus | 56.75% | 1,623 | 43.25% | 1,237 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 13.50% | 386 |
| Beaufort | 56.28% | 2,316 | 43.72% | 1,799 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 12.56% | 517 |
| Northampton | 55.66% | 1,992 | 44.34% | 1,587 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 11.32% | 405 |
| Burke | 55.25% | 1,389 | 44.15% | 1,110 | 0.28% | 7 | 0.32% | 8 | 11.10% | 279 |
| Iredell | 54.32% | 2,523 | 44.00% | 2,044 | 0.37% | 17 | 1.31% | 61 | 10.31% | 479 |
| Dare | 54.97% | 404 | 45.03% | 331 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 9.93% | 73 |
| Tyrrell | 54.89% | 466 | 45.11% | 383 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 9.78% | 83 |
| Wake | 54.65% | 4,774 | 45.18% | 3,947 | 0.17% | 15 | 0.00% | 0 | 9.47% | 827 |
| Montgomery | 54.43% | 1,100 | 45.52% | 920 | 0.05% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 8.91% | 180 |
| Jones | 54.26% | 714 | 45.74% | 602 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 8.51% | 112 |
| Gaston | 53.42% | 1,931 | 44.98% | 1,626 | 1.38% | 50 | 0.22% | 8 | 8.44% | 305 |
| Rockingham | 54.05% | 2,652 | 45.89% | 2,252 | 0.06% | 3 | 0.00% | 0 | 8.15% | 400 |
| Warren | 54.05% | 1,573 | 45.95% | 1,337 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 8.11% | 236 |
| Durham | 53.71% | 2,373 | 45.86% | 2,026 | 0.32% | 14 | 0.11% | 5 | 7.85% | 347 |
| Person | 53.37% | 1,466 | 46.38% | 1,274 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.25% | 7 | 6.99% | 192 |
| Harnett | 52.79% | 1,342 | 47.17% | 1,199 | 0.04% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 5.63% | 143 |
| Hyde | 52.01% | 867 | 47.87% | 798 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.12% | 2 | 4.14% | 69 |
| Alleghany | 51.71% | 709 | 48.29% | 662 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 3.43% | 47 |
| Washington | 51.55% | 834 | 48.45% | 784 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 3.09% | 50 |
| Catawba | 48.97% | 1,612 | 46.23% | 1,522 | 1.91% | 63 | 2.89% | 95 | 2.73% | 90 |
| Caswell | 51.20% | 1,342 | 48.72% | 1,277 | 0.08% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 2.48% | 65 |
| Rutherford | 51.22% | 2,081 | 48.76% | 1,981 | 0.02% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 2.46% | 100 |
| Jackson | 50.30% | 1,080 | 48.77% | 1,047 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.93% | 20 | 1.54% | 33 |
| Clay | 50.63% | 404 | 49.37% | 394 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 1.25% | 10 |
| Guilford | 49.96% | 3,335 | 49.37% | 3,296 | 0.67% | 45 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.58% | 39 |
| Orange | 49.71% | 1,275 | 49.90% | 1,280 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.39% | 10 | -0.19% | -5 |
| McDowell | 49.34% | 1,014 | 49.83% | 1,024 | 0.44% | 9 | 0.39% | 8 | -0.49% | -10 |
| Perquimans | 49.52% | 830 | 50.48% | 846 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | -0.95% | -16 |
| Chowan | 49.07% | 898 | 50.93% | 932 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | -1.86% | -34 |
| Forsyth | 48.70% | 2,482 | 50.77% | 2,588 | 0.53% | 27 | 0.00% | 0 | -2.08% | -106 |
| Macon | 48.46% | 977 | 51.34% | 1,035 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.20% | 4 | -2.88% | -58 |
| Pasquotank | 48.26% | 1,196 | 51.74% | 1,282 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | -3.47% | -86 |
| Camden | 48.21% | 498 | 51.79% | 535 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | -3.58% | -37 |
| Bladen | 47.62% | 1,102 | 51.51% | 1,192 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.86% | 20 | -3.89% | -90 |
| Graham | 48.05% | 358 | 51.95% | 387 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | -3.89% | -29 |
| Cumberland | 47.75% | 1,964 | 51.98% | 2,138 | 0.24% | 10 | 0.02% | 1 | -4.23% | -174 |
| Randolph | 47.37% | 2,264 | 52.04% | 2,487 | 0.59% | 28 | 0.00% | 0 | -4.67% | -223 |
| Buncombe | 47.15% | 3,724 | 52.41% | 4,140 | 0.42% | 33 | 0.03% | 2 | -5.27% | -416 |
| Yancey | 46.86% | 954 | 53.14% | 1,082 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | -6.29% | -128 |
| Alamance | 45.60% | 1,923 | 53.50% | 2,256 | 0.76% | 32 | 0.14% | 6 | -7.90% | -333 |
| Transylvania | 45.84% | 529 | 53.90% | 622 | 0.26% | 3 | 0.00% | 0 | -8.06% | -93 |
| Caldwell | 45.11% | 1,111 | 53.47% | 1,317 | 1.14% | 28 | 0.28% | 7 | -8.36% | -206 |
| Alexander | 44.53% | 774 | 53.97% | 938 | 1.50% | 26 | 0.00% | 0 | -9.44% | -164 |
| Brunswick | 43.97% | 525 | 53.85% | 643 | 0.00% | 0 | 2.18% | 26 | -9.88% | -118 |
| Pamlico | 45.02% | 597 | 54.98% | 729 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | -9.95% | -132 |
| Stokes | 44.52% | 1,443 | 55.48% | 1,798 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | -10.95% | -355 |
| Moore | 44.04% | 1,606 | 55.63% | 2,029 | 0.05% | 2 | 0.27% | 10 | -11.60% | -423 |
| Lincoln | 43.58% | 892 | 55.35% | 1,133 | 0.15% | 3 | 0.93% | 19 | -11.77% | -241 |
| Davidson | 43.44% | 1,823 | 55.49% | 2,329 | 0.45% | 19 | 0.62% | 26 | -12.06% | -506 |
| Ashe | 43.83% | 1,513 | 56.11% | 1,937 | 0.06% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | -12.28% | -424 |
| Surry | 43.64% | 1,898 | 56.36% | 2,451 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | -12.72% | -553 |
| Swain | 43.00% | 590 | 57.00% | 782 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | -13.99% | -192 |
| Polk | 42.34% | 484 | 57.04% | 652 | 0.61% | 7 | 0.00% | 0 | -14.70% | -168 |
| Davie | 39.11% | 831 | 58.87% | 1,251 | 1.74% | 37 | 0.28% | 6 | -19.76% | -420 |
| Cherokee | 39.96% | 774 | 59.73% | 1,157 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.31% | 6 | -19.77% | -383 |
| Chatham | 39.65% | 1,489 | 59.65% | 2,240 | 0.05% | 2 | 0.64% | 24 | -20.00% | -751 |
| Henderson | 39.63% | 973 | 60.37% | 1,482 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | -20.73% | -509 |
| Sampson | 36.82% | 1,257 | 58.64% | 2,002 | 1.46% | 50 | 3.08% | 105 | -21.82% | -745 |
| Watauga | 39.04% | 923 | 60.87% | 1,439 | 0.08% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | -21.83% | -516 |
| Wilkes | 37.48% | 1,704 | 62.47% | 2,840 | 0.04% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | -24.99% | -1,136 |
| Yadkin | 35.32% | 950 | 64.42% | 1,733 | 0.26% | 7 | 0.00% | 0 | -29.11% | -783 |
| Madison | 34.79% | 1,268 | 65.21% | 2,377 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | -30.43% | -1,109 |
| Mitchell | 20.05% | 491 | 79.95% | 1,958 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | -59.90% | -1,467 |