# States and federal territories of Malaysia

"none" is preferred when the title is sufficiently descriptive; see [[WP:SDNONE]]
The states and federal territories of Malaysia are the primary administrative divisions of the country. Malaysia comprises a federation of 13 states (Negeri) and 3 federal territories (Wilayah Persekutuan).

## States and federal territories

Eleven states and two federal territories are located on the Malay Peninsula, collectively called Peninsular Malaysia or West Malaysia. Two states and one federal territory lie on the island of Borneo; they are collectively referred to as East Malaysia.$^{:2}$ Of the 13 states in Malaysia, 9 are monarchies.$^{:175}$
* Perlis
* Kedah
* Penang
* Kelantan
* Terengganu
* Perak
* Selangor
* Negeri Sembilan
* Malacca
* Johor
* Pahang
* Sarawak
* Sabah
* Labuan
* Kuala Lumpur
* Putrajaya
* West Malaysia
* East Malaysia
* (Blue) States
* (Red) Federal Territories
* South China Sea
* Strait of Malacca
* Gulf of Thailand
* Sulu Sea
* Celebes Sea
* Brunei
* Indonesia
* Indonesia
* Indonesia
* Philippines
* Singapore
* Thailand

### States

| State | Capital | Royal capital | Pop. | Area (km$^2$) | Licence plate | Area code | ISO | HDI | Head of state | Head of government |
| Johor Darul Ta'zim | Johor Bahru | Muar | 4,186,300 | 19,210 | J | 07, 06 (Muar & Tangkak) | MY-01 | 0.821 | Sultan | Menteri Besar |
| Kedah Darul Aman | Alor Setar | Anak Bukit | 2,217,500 | 9,500 | K | 04 | MY-02 | 0.804 | Sultan | Menteri Besar |
| Kelantan Darul Naim | Kota Bharu | Kubang Kerian | 1,888,500 | 15,099 | D | 09 | MY-03 | 0.774 | Sultan | Menteri Besar |
| Malacca | Malacca City | — | 1,047,100 | 1,664 | M | 06 | MY-04 | 0.831 | Yang di-Pertua Negeri (Governor) | Chief Minister |
| Negeri Sembilan Darul Khusus | Seremban | Seri Menanti | 1,240,100 | 6,686 | N | 06 | MY-05 | 0.825 | Yang di-Pertuan Besar (Grand Ruler) | Menteri Besar |
| Pahang Darul Makmur | Kuantan | Pekan | 1,668,200 | 36,137 | C | 09, 03 (Genting Highlands), 05 (Cameron) | MY-06 | 0.801 | Sultan | Menteri Besar |
| Penang | George Town | — | 1,800,400 | 1,048 | P | 04 | MY-07 | 0.841 | Yang di-Pertua Negeri (Governor) | Chief Minister |
| Perak Darul Ridzuan | Ipoh | Kuala Kangsar | 2,569,600 | 21,035 | A | 05 | MY-08 | 0.812 | Sultan | Menteri Besar |
| Perlis | Kangar | Arau | 296,800 | 821 | R | 04 | MY-09 | 0.801 | Raja | Menteri Besar |
| Sabah | Kota Kinabalu | — | 3,742,200 | 73,631 | S | 087–089 | MY-12 | 0.772 | Yang di-Pertua Negeri (Governor) | Chief Minister |
| Sarawak | Kuching | — | 2,518,100 | 124,450 | Q | 081–086 | MY-13 | 0.824 | Yang di-Pertua Negeri (Governor) | Premier |
| Selangor Darul Ehsan | Shah Alam | Klang | 7,363,400 | 8,104 | B | 03 | MY-10 | 0.859 | Sultan | Menteri Besar |
| Terengganu Darul Iman | Kuala Terengganu | Kuala Terengganu | 1,232,100 | 13,035 | T | 09 | MY-11 | 0.796 | Sultan | Menteri Besar |

### Federal Territories

| Federal Territory | Capital | Pop. | Area (km$^2$) | License plate | Area code | ISO | HDI | Head of state | Head of government |
| Kuala Lumpur | Kuala Lumpur | 2,067,500 | 243 | W / V | 03 | MY-14 | 0.863 | Yang di-Pertuan Agong | Mayor |
| Labuan | Victoria | 100,800 | 91 | L | 087 | MY-15 | 0.782 | Yang di-Pertuan Agong | President of Labuan Corporation |
| Putrajaya | Putrajaya | 120,300 | 49 | F | 03 | MY-16 | N/A | Yang di-Pertuan Agong | President of Putrajaya Corporation |

## History
### Creation of the federation

Malaysia's federal system arose due the preservation of existing sultanates on the Malay Peninsula who came under British control. The initial British possessions in the region, Penang in 1786, Singapore in 1819, and Malacca in 1825, were directly controlled by the UK. However, later expansion was carried out through the establishment of protectorates.$^{:225}$ The 1826 Burney Treaty between Siam and the United Kingdom saw Thailand relinquish its claims over Pahang, Perak, and all territory to their south, although the United Kingdom did not claim this territory.$^{:231}$ In 1873, policy changes under John Wodehouse, 1st Earl of Kimberley, led to British intervention in the Larut Wars in Perak, the Klang War in Selangor, and in Sungei Ujong (now part of Negeri Sembilan). Beginning in 1874, Andrew Clarke forced the rulers of these sultanates to accept British oversight, establishing the residency system and creating the first formal protectorates. A resident was installed in Pahang in 1888, while the Anglo-Siamese Treaty of 1909 brought Kedah, Kelantan, Perlis, and Terengganu under British control. A protectorate over Johor was established in 1914, bringing all territory south of Siam under British control.$^{:232–233,235}$ The establishment of such residences brought the Sultans under indirect rule, however it also strengthened their domestic control by developing new administrative structures under them.$^{:210}$ The Sultans who had moved from Thai to British sovereignty, along with Johor, resisted a full Resident, instead accepting less powerful Advisors.$^{:211}$
In 1895, the Federated Malay States was created, bringing together Negeri Sembilan, Pahang, Perak, and Selangor into a shared governmental structure. The power of this new body over the individual sultanates was kept limited, to ensure the United Kingdom remained on good terms with the Sultans, setting a precedent for later attempts at unification.$^{:3–5}$ The remaining five sultanates became known as the Unfederated Malay States, while the directly ruled Penang, Malacca, and Singapore became knows as the Straits Settlements. The demographics and economies of these groups diverged, with the Straits Settlements turning into cosmopolitan cities, while the Federated Malay States saw Chinese and Indian immigration to urban areas. In rural areas, and among the Unfederated Malay States, the population remained mostly Malay, and economies grew slower.$^{:211}$ The civil services of each of the Federated Malay States were merged with those of Penang and Malacca. Other services, including police, health, education, and law, also saw consolidation across borders.$^{:9}$ On the island of Borneo, North Borneo and Sarawak became British protectorates in 1888. Brunei also became a British protectorate around this time.$^{:211}$
Movement towards bringing these disparately ruled territories together was resisted until the Second World War led to a Japanese invasion in 1942.$^{:211}$ In 1946, shortly following the end of Japanese occupation, the nine sultanates under British protection were joined together with Malacca and Penang to form the Malayan Union. This had a strong central government, removing most power from the Sultans. This, alongside other issues, made the union greatly unpopular,$^{:225}$$^{:146}$ and in 1948 it was replaced with the 11-state Federation of Malaya. This union was structured to preserve the identity of the component states, and included consultation mechanisms for when there was disagreement between state and central government. The agreement of the Sultans (who formed the Conference of Rulers) was needed for any constitutional change, forcing the ruling Alliance Party to negotiate with the Sultans as it established governmental structures.$^{:5–6}$
Malaya became independent with a new constitution drafted by the Reid Commission in 1957,$^{:147}$ with its federal system inspired by the Constitution of India,$^{:66}$ overcoming independence movements in Johor, Kelantan, and Penang.$^{:6}$$^{:86}$ This constitution gave the central government significant power, in part influenced by a desire to grow the economy and an ongoing insurgency. While the governing coalition was led by the Malay UMNO, it incorporated Chinese and Indian parties whose members were less concerned with preserving the power of the Sultans.$^{:490–491}$ Alliance convincingly won the first post-independence election in 1959, winning 9 of the then-11 states.$^{:213}$
In Borneo, North Borneo and Sarawak came under direct British control as crown colonies in 1946, following the Second World War. The political interests of leaders in Malaya and Singapore, which aligned with British strategic interests, led to discussions to expand the federation to encompass other British territories in Southeast Asia, namely Brunei, North Borneo, Sarawak, and Singapore. While Brunei pulled out of negotiations,$^{:4–6}$ in 1963 Malaya was joined with three new states: Sabah, Sarawak, and Singapore, becoming Malaysia. This expansion, sometimes also described as the creation of a new federation, was created through the Malaysia Agreement, under which the new states had greater autonomy than the 11 existing states. Singapore became independent in 1965, leaving the current 13 states. Local parties in Sabah and Sarawak soon aligned themselves with Alliance.$^{:213}$ It is not known if the Conference of Rulers gave its approval for the expansion of the country, indicating the early dominance of the central government.$^{:6}$ Objections to the expansion by Kelantan, which argued the expansion effectively abolished the previous federation and thus that it should not bind Kelantan, were dismissed by the courts.$^{:7}$$^{:83}$

### Dominant party rule

The Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition, led by the UMNO party, controlled the national government from independence until 2018. In particular, control of government gradually consolidated under UMNO party leadership and the Prime Minister's Department (PMD).$^{:492}$ The continuous rule of BN facilitated the shift of power towards the central government. Party loyalists were appointed to federal and state positions. Institutional checks, such as the veto power of the Senate, were weakened. New national laws and institutions circumvented the formal powers of the states. This control could allow for quite granular interventions, for example through the Commercial Vehicles Licensing Board, the federal government could manage local-level bus routes.$^{:492–493}$ The National Council for Local Government was formed in 1960, formalising federal influence at the local level.$^{:493}$ Local council elections were suspended in 1965.$^{:8}$ In 1964, the Senate was expanded to include 32 appointees of the central government, increasing from 22 and meaning central government appointees outnumber the sum of all senators appointed by states (two from each state).$^{:4}$
Following independence, two main opposition groups arose. The Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS) gained support in the northeast, especially Kelantan and Terengganu, while opposition non-Malay groups gained support in parts of the west coast: Penang, Perak, and Selangor. PAS won in Kelantan and Terengganu in 1959, although in 1961 defections in the Terengganu parliament gave control to UMNO. The national government arrested some PAS leaders, charging them with supporting Indonesia in the Indonesia–Malaysia confrontation. However, it was unable to win Kelantan in the 1964 or 1969 elections. The 1969 Malaysian general election also saw UMNO lose Penang to Parti Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia, and hung parliaments emerge in Perak and Selangor.$^{:218}$ While PAS did not win another state, it won almost 24% of the popular vote nationally.$^{:219}$ The disruptive political results were followed by race riots. The national government suspended the constitution and parliament as a response. While emergency rule was ended after 20 months, BN gained a consistent two-thirds parliamentary majority afterwards.$^{:428}$ Gerakan, PAS, and other opposition parties made agreements with UMNO, and Alliance was reformed into the broader Barisan Nasional (BN).$^{:219}$
Control over the economy was centralised through the 1971 New Economic Policy.$^{:8}$ The Petroleum Development Act 1974 shifted control of oil and natural gas production in Sabah, Sarawak, and Teregganu to the national government, in exchange for 5% of profit.$^{:163}$ The Local Government Act 1976 conferred some powers over local government to the national government.$^{:493}$ 1976 also saw the national constitution amended to symbolically declare Sabah and Sarawak equivalent to the other states.$^{:496}$ State Economic Development Corporations became effectively controlled by the federal government in the mid-1970s, despite being initially established by states.$^{:493}$$^{:431}$ Privitisation efforts in the 1980s and 1990s saw control of public services removed from states in favour of private companies. The central government imposed bureaucratic barriers to give it control over some state decisions, and withheld funding from state governments that disagreed with it,$^{:8}$ such as halting general subsidies to Kelantan during periods when it was governed by the opposition, and halting oil proceeds to Terengganu in a similar situation.$^{:163}$
The constitution was amended to make tourism a federal responsibility in 1994 without consulting the states, although in practice states still promote their own tourism. It was also amended to make water management a concurrent responsibility rather than a state one in 2006.$^{:96}$ Over time, the Senate has slowly become more dominated by appointments by the central government, reducing the power of those appointed by states.$^{:7–8}$ National government control of Islam has also grown. The creation of Malaysia Economic Corridors, which operate under the PMD, brought three quarters of land under a parallel structure of government control to that of the states.$^{:494}$
The proportion of revenue that went to the national government became even more lopsided, increasing from 80.5% after the formation of Malaysia to 90.7% in the late 2000s.$^{:426}$$^{:13}$ The national government began to fund states more through loans than through grants.$^{:431–432}$ With state funding dependent not only on their own revenue but on federal government favour, there was unequal development, with the public sector growing in some states and decreasing in others. Relative to GDP, the public sector was consistently small in Sabah and Sarawak.$^{:446}$ Kedah saw high relative growth in the late 20th century, coinciding with the long rule of Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, who was from that state.$^{:453}$
Due to this control, state governments were heavily influenced by the national government, reducing the theoretical impact of the federal system. The national government was effectively able to select the Chief Ministers of each state. Until 2008, UMNO also led almost all of the state governments, never losing control of more than 2 at a time.$^{:208}$ In Sabah and Sarawak, local parties often aligned themselves with BN, and the central government intervened to shape the development of the politics of its new states.$^{:6}$ The expulsion of Singapore from Malaysia in 1965 was an early example of central government power. The Chief Ministers of Sabah and Sarawak, Fuad Stephens and Stephen Kalong Ningkan respectively, were not consulted on the expulsion by Malaysian Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman.$^{:5–6}$ In 1966, the federal government engineered the removal of Stephen Kalong Ningkan as Chief Minister of Sarawak, eventually declaring a state of emergency to resolve the constitutional crisis that had emerged in its favour. Both the federal and Sarawak constitutions were amended to enable the dismissals of chief ministers.$^{:429–430}$ In 1970, an UMNO-friendly government was elected in Sarawak.$^{:221}$
The Chief Minister of Kelantan was effectively removed by the federal government in 1978.$^{:96}$ This crisis, precipitated by a split in PAS between those who supported and opposed an alliance with the federal government, led to UMNO expelling PAS from BN. A February 1978 snap election in which campaigning was banned saw PAS lose the state to UMNO and its allies, being reduced to two of the 36 seats in the Kelantan parliament. PAS recovered only in 1988, when a member of the Kelantan royal family left UMNO after losing a leadership election, and formed an electoral alliance with PAS which won the state's 1990 election.$^{:219–220}$ In 1991, when two Kelantan lawmakers defected to UMNO, Kelantan amended its constitution to require a by-election. This change would remove the ability of UMNO to entice defectors, which it had done in several states before. The amendment was however struck down by the Supreme Court.$^{:221}$ In 1993, the constitution was amended to strip state royalty of legal immunity, with the central government stripping all support from the monarchies it legally could and engaging in a public relations campaign in order to obtain royal consent for the amendment.
The autonomy of Sabah and Sarawak gradually diminished in practice, despite the assurances of the Malaysia Agreement, although their indigenous populations were granted bumiputera status in 1971. Upon forming Malaysia the constitution was changed to list the new states separately from the existing ones, however a later amendment combined this into one list. The federal government facilitated the spread of Islam in the new states, and it became the official religion of Sabah in 1973. The civil service in Sabah and Sarawak is dominated by individuals from West Malaysia, and both states received only 5% of the royalties derived from natural resource exploitation in their territory. The national Electoral Commission controlled state constituency boundaries.$^{:8}$ The independence of East Pakistan led to the use of "Peninsular Malaysia" becoming officially preferred to "West Malaysia", and "Sabah and Sarawak" replacing "East Malaysia", to reduce links between the two Bornean states.$^{:442}$ Overall, the federal government clashed more with the Sabahan government than the Sarawakian one.$^{:449}$$^{:223–225}$ Development grants allocated to both states lessened over time.$^{:449}$ While they were higher per capita than those given to other states, the relative underdevelopment of those two states has persisted since federation,$^{:453}$ with a net transfer of wealth away from the two states.$^{:225}$
Kelantan elected the opposition Malaysian Islamic Party in 1959, and they governed until 1978.$^{:499}$ Kelantan returned to opposition control in 1990. However, outside of this state opposition parties did not see much electoral success. Notable periods of opposition rule occurred in Sabah (1985-1994) and Terengganu (1999-2004).$^{:194}$ When the opposition held Sabah, development funding was shifted to other states, and timber exports, which were a source of state funding, were banned. The central government worked directly with local authorities, bypassing the state government, and encouraged voting for BN as a way to receive investments.$^{:494}$ In the 1990s some Sabahan politicians calling for autonomy were accused of fostering secession and detained.$^{:199}$ The 1990s also saw UMNO officially start operating in Sabah. Its activities there sought to undermine local parties, and its Sabahan branch even accepted non-Muslims as party members. After taking control in 1994, UMNO instituted a system of rotating chief ministers, meaning none served a full term.$^{:451}$
From 1990, development funding to Kelantan was also reduced, with the state receiving the second-smallest allocation.$^{:500}$ The federal government also stopped providing oil royalties. to Kelantan.$^{:432}$ In 2000, the national government shifted petroleum royalties paid by Petronas from Terengganu to the federal government, replacing it with a smaller direct transfer from the federal to state government. In 2015, Petronas ceased all payments to the state government.$^{:500}$ The tensions created by these changes exacerbated existing inequality, with Kelantan and Terengganu being relatively poor states.$^{:446}$ The general strength of the Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS) in these northeastern states and their neighbours was a result of both rising political Islam and continued poverty.$^{:451–453}$
The 1997 Asian financial crisis led to the national government to take on further control of public services.$^{:494}$ Some companies that had taken over utilities from states were nationalised under the federal government. Some that were not became supervised by federal commissions, which lacked state representatives.$^{:432–433}$
After independence, the concept of federal territories directly administered by the federal government arose. In 1973, Kuala Lumpur was separated from Selangor to become a separate territory, partly as a response to the a race riot that occurred in the city in 1969. Labuan, a British territory since 1847 that was joined to North Borneo in 1946, was split from Sabah in 1984 to become an offshore financial centre. A third, Putrajaya, was split from Selangor in 2001 to serve as the administrative capital.$^{:7,11}$$^{:491}$

### Revival of federalism

The elections in 2008 saw BN lose its two-thirds majority in the national parliament,$^{:146}$ It also saw Penang, Perak, Kedah, and Selangor elect opposition governments, while the government of the opposition-led Kelantan increased its majority. The opposition wins in the relatively wealthier west coast states limited the tools BN had previously used in poorer states.$^{:226}$ The opposition formed the broad Pakatan Rakyat alliance to contest the election, united primarily by opposition to BN rather than by ideology.$^{:502}$
The loss of economically important states provided a new political platform for the opposition, and created a visible alternative to BN rule. The national government responded to the loss of these states by further strengthening central power. The budget of the PMD was expanded, and by 2012 was by itself 10 times larger than the budget of Selangor, and 15 times the budget of Penang. New agencies within the PMD gained increased control over economic planning, with the PMD controlling 25% of economic planning by 2015.$^{:489–490}$ The Ministry of Tourism ended cooperation with opposition-led states, and shifted Tourist Action Councils in those states under federal control. Civil servants and workers for federal ministries in opposition-run states were instructed not to attend state government functions,$^{:10}$ and Village Development and Safety Committees and Residents' Representation Committees began reporting directly to the federal government, as opposed to BN-run states where they reported to state governments.$^{:11}$
In Perak, the BN induced three state legislators to defect, creating a constitutional crisis when the Sultan then appointed an UMNO-led government. While this was initially reversed by the Malaya High court, it was endorsed by the Court of Appeal.$^{:495}$
The 2011 Tenth Malaysia Plan dropped all mention of cooperating with the states regarding economic development, contrasting with previous plans.$^{:496}$ The federally-run State development offices of Penang and Selangor began operating from outside of those states, and stopped sending reports to the state governments.$^{:432}$ New economic growth corridors were set up, extending federal control over the 76% of the country they covered.$^{:437–438}$
Penang and Selangor went on to join Kelantan in becoming opposition strongholds.$^{:2–3}$ In 2010, Selangor and Penang appealed to the Electoral Commission for the reinstatement of local elections. This was denied, with the Commission stating that approval was needed from the National Council for Local Government.$^{:9}$ In 2012, Penang tried again to reintroduce local elections, however this was ignored by the Electoral Commission and blocked by the courts.$^{:501}$ Selangor unsuccessfully tried to regain control of water infrastructure privatised by the previous state government,$^{:434}$ and both states tried to regain control of waste management.$^{:2}$ It also sought to amend its constitution to gain control of its civil service, which did not reach the two-thirds majority required.$^{:427}$ The persistence of such opposition governments influenced changes in BN rule. UMNO committed to running more female candidates following opposition commitments to do so. Efforts by the Selangor government to improve bus services and subsidise housing were imitated by the federal government.$^{:502–503}$
Disputes with the national government also emerged in BN-led states. Oil revenue distribution was raised by Kelantan, Sabah, Sarawak, and Terengganu.$^{:2}$ Sarawak used its importance to the small BN majority in parliament to extract concessions from Petronas, and set up its own oil company.$^{:14}$ In 2016 Mukhriz Mahathir was removed from his position as Chief Minister of Kedah after criticising the Prime Minister, despite Mahathir being an UMNO member.$^{:494}$ In 2017 the Minister of the Federal Territories proposed converting Penang, Langkawi (part of Kedah), and parts of Malacca into federal territories, a symbolic assertion of national government power.$^{:501}$
The rise of the opposition, and thus the weakening of BN, also provided political space for the Sultans to reassert their influence.$^{:209}$ In 2015 the Crown Prince of Johor asserted Johor had the right to secede if its autonomy was infringed upon.$^{:501}$
State government changes following the 2018 election$^{:26}$ :
| State | Government change (E=election, C=other change) | Coalition in government |
| Johor | May 2018 (E) March 2020 (C) March 2022 (E) | PH BN-PN BN |
| Kedah | May 2018 (E) February 2020 (C) May 2020 (C) August 2023 (E) | PH PH-Bersatu PN-BN PN |
| Kelantan | May 2018 (E) March 2020 (C) August 2023 (E) | PAS PN PN |
| Malacca | May 2018 (E) March 2020 (C) November 2021 (E) April 2023 (C) | PH BN-PN BN BN-PH |
| Negeri Sembilan | May 2018 (E) August 2023 (E) | PH PH-BN |
| Pahang | May 2018 (E) November 2022 (E) | BN BN-PH |
| Penang | May 2018 (E) August 2023 (E) | PH PH-BN |
| Perak | May 2018 (E) March 2020 (C) November 2022 (E) | PH BN-PN BN-PH |
| Perlis | May 2018 (E) November 2022 (E) | BN PN |
| Sabah | May 2018 (E) May 2018 (C) September 2020 (E) | BN Warisan-PH-UPKO GRS |
| Sarawak | December 2021 (E) | GPS |
| Selangor | May 2018 (E) August 2023 (E) | PH PH-BN |
| Terengganu | May 2018 (E) March 2020 (C) August 2023 (E) | PAS PN PN |
In 2014, the federal government softened its longstanding opposition to the introduction of Hudud punishments in Kelantan. This may have been politically influenced, to split the Islamist Malaysian Islamic Party from others in Pakatan Rakyat, and to shore up support among rural Malays. Pakatan Rakyat dissolved in 2015.$^{:502}$ The Pakatan Harapan (PH) opposition alliance was formed to contest the 2018 Malaysian general election. Its election manifesto explicitly called for a revival of "the true spirit of federalism", as well as the promise to restore the autonomy of Sabah and Sarawak.$^{:2}$
The 2018 election saw BN lose power at the national level for the first time. BN also lost power in 8 of the 10 states it governed prior to that election.$^{:1}$ State governments saw a period of shifting coalitions and much more complex party politics,$^{:2}$$^{:6}$ and discussions about state power, including the status of Sabah and Sarawak, became active political topics. The PH government formed a Parliamentary Select Committee to discuss Federal-State relations.$^{:2}$
After the 2022 Malaysian general election formed a national coalition form between UMNO and Pakatan Harapan, most state governments led by those alliances brought the other into government. In Johor, the concept of an official opposition was replaced by the idea of a "balancing force", and the PH-affiliated former opposition adopted this role instead of joining the UMNO government. In Terengganu, the Perikatan Nasional coalition won all seats, leading to there being no opposition.$^{:2–3}$ During this administration, states including Sabah and Terengganu sought to gain greater control over oil revenue.$^{:21}$

### Restoration of Sabah and Sarawak status

In conjunction with the celebration of Malaysia Day in 2018 under the new Pakatan Harapan (PH) government, Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad promised to restore Sabah and Sarawak status in the Malaysian federation in accordance with the Malaysia Agreement, restoring "their status from merely a state to an equal partner of the Malayan states". Although the status of both entities were clearly defined in Article I, Malaysia Agreement 1963 as 'states' which shall be federated with the existing states of the Federation of Malaya. However, through the process of the amendment, the bill failed to pass following the failure to reach two-thirds majority support (148 votes) in the Parliament with only 138 agreed with the move while 59 abstained from the voting. Nevertheless, the Malaysian federal government agreed to review the 1963 agreement to remedy breaches of the treaty with the "Special Cabinet Committee To Review the Malaysia Agreement" and directed a Special Task Force Team (Taskforce MA63) to prepare a final report on the 1963 agreement before 31 August 2019.
Two years after the failed attempt, on 16 September 2021, Prime Minister Ismail Sabri Yaakob pledged to look into issues relating to Sabah and Sarawak via the Special Council on Malaysia Agreement 1963, with negotiations being chaired by the Prime Minister, joined by the Chief Ministers of Sabah and Sarawak, as well as eight federal ministers. On 19 October 2021, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Sabah and Sarawak Affairs) Maximus Ongkili announced a Bill to be tabled in the coming Parliament sitting after the Special Council on Malaysia Agreement 1963 agreed to Articles 1(2) and 160(2) of the Federal Constitution to restore Sabah and Sarawak as equal partners to Peninsular Malaysia. The proposed law differs from the 2019 proposed amendments by the then Pakatan Harapan government, being tabled by Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Parliament) Wan Junaidi. Discussions on restoring Sabahans and Sarawakians' rights will continue in the meantime. The same meeting also saw the council agree to empower both the Sabah and Sarawah governments to issue deep fishing licences as opposed to the federal government currently. The amendments were tabled on 3 November 2021, consisting of four changes, being restoring Sabah and Sarawak as "partners", defining Malaysia Day as the day when Sabah and Sarawak joined and changes to the definition of the Federation, and defining who are natives of Sabah and Sarawak. On 14 December 2021, the proposed amendment was passed in the Parliament unanimously with 199 votes in favour, and 21 MPs absent from the 6-hour long debate. On 6 January 2022, Minister Ongkili announced the setting up of a joint technical committee to study Sabah's proposal for increased annual grants in addition to a counteroffer from the Federal Government.

## Federal-state relations

The Ninth Schedule of the Constitution of Malaysia divides powers into three lists: exclusively federal competencies, exclusively state competencies, and a concurrent list where both have input. The federal list includes trade, industry and development, foreign affairs, law, internal security and policing, and education.$^{:6}$ Malaysian states have control of Islamic law, native administration, local government, and land and natural resource use. Through the concurrent list, states also have a role in managing welfare, water and irrigation, planning, culture, sports, and health. Control of land is key to the funding of state governments, although many take on debt from the central government.$^{:6}$$^{:8}$
States have no power over the federal constitution, and the central government can amend state constitutions. Where laws conflict, federal law takes precedence, although the constitution does contain provisions for judicial review upon a conflict arising between state and federal government, or between states.$^{:7}$ The Federal Court of Malaysia adjudicates such conflicts. Both the Prime Minister and the Conference of Rulers (made up of the heads of all states) advise the King on the appointment of judges. The approval of the Conference of Rulers is needed for any changes affecting royalty, or any changes to state borders. Aside from that, their role, and that of the King, is mostly symbolic and ceremonial.$^{:148–149}$
While the population of Malaysia is ethnically and religiously diverse, such diversity is spread throughout the country and not inherently reflected by the borders of the states. (There is a significant distinction however between the peninsular states and the two states of East Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak, which have large indigenous populations.) Instead, the establishment of a federal system reflected a compromise to preserve the power of the Malay sultanates. In practice, the system allowed enough power to be exercised by the central government that it has been described as "quasi-federal".$^{:92}$ It is through their role in the states, and their representation in the Conference of Rulers, that the Sultans are able to wield informal influence.$^{:103}$ Differences between states are prominent in the governance of Islam, and in the functioning of the monarchy.$^{:93}$ (In states without Sultans, the King fills their role for Islam.)$^{:175}$
The Malaysian constitution provides less autonomy to its states than might be expected in a federal system, creating a relatively centralised country. Furthermore, while the formal powers of states have remained mostly the same since independence, and while states retain similar administrative bodies, their power and capacity has been informally curtailed through various direct efforts of the national government, as well as being practically constrained by fiscal limitations.$^{:489,494,497}$ Overlapping institutions, such as the National Council of Local Government, and the presence of economic corridors under federal control, provide mechanisms for federal control of competencies formally assigned to states.$^{:493–494}$ Historically, most state elections have occurred alongside national elections, strengthening the electoral influence of the national government campaign.$^{:498–499}$ State electoral boundaries tend not to cross national parliamentary boundaries, creating a direct geographical hierarchy between state and national parliament.$^{:215}$
Much central government control falls directly under the Prime Minister's Department (PMD), which controls the Election Commission of Malaysia, the Petronas company, and the Federal Land Development Authority, among other departments.$^{:496}$ In multiple administrations, the Prime Minister has also held the position as Minister of Finance, strengthening their fiscal control.$^{:495}$ States have very limited revenue generating powers,$^{:12}$ and thus limited funding. With most taxes, customs, and licensing controlled by the federal government, states mostly rely on natural resource revenue, and returns from entertainment and religious institutions. These funding streams are highly dependent on geography, creating significant inter-state inequality, although even rich states remain limited. All states combined raised a tenth of what the federal government raised in 2016, and state expenditures amount to perhaps only 7% of overall government expenditure (another 3% comes from local government). This leaves states unable to provide many services. (The federally funded Universiti Sains Malaysia, based in Penang, has double the budget of the entire Penang government.)$^{:500}$ Federal grants are distributed to states to allow them to provide services, and are usually given with very specific purposes$^{:13,15}$ approved by the federal government. Federal approval is also needed for state governments to borrow money, and is only allowed for capital expenditure.$^{:500}$ Federal control over economic development further increases control over the large infrastructure projects such expenditure would fund.$^{:426}$ Overall, states fund about 80% of their activities.$^{:13}$
In some states, especially smaller ones, state government composition is influenced by the composition of the national government. This may help secure funding for the state.$^{:3}$ During the period of BN dominance, state branches of UMNO were often controlled by the central government, effectively meaning states could be controlled through party management.$^{:492,499}$ Many states have ceded some authority in order to balance their budgets, and the provision of subsidies as decided by the National Finance Council provides another method for the national government to influence state policy.$^{:163}$ While states appoint one representative each to the council, the federal government appoints others to the council, and council decisions are not binding on the Prime Minister.$^{:11}$
While the civil services of the former Unfederated Malay States (Johor, Perlis, Kedah, Kelantan, and Terengganu) are controlled by those states, those of other states are led by central government appointees.$^{:7–8}$ Despite the state's paying these civil servant salaries, they have no veto over appointments, and their activities can be directed by the federal government.$^{:10}$ This has meant the civil service has sometimes been uncooperative with opposition governments.$^{:499}$ The federal government also appoints local council mayors, and can directly fund local activities, bypassing state governments.$^{:10}$
Theoretically, any matter not set out in the Ninth Schedule can be legislated on by the individual states. However, legal scholars generally view this as a "pauper's bequest" because of the large scope of the matters listed in the Ninth Schedule. The courts themselves have generally favoured a broad interpretation of the language of the Ninth Schedule, thus limiting the number of possible subjects not covered. The Parliament of Malaysia is permitted to legislate on issues of land, Islamic religion and local government to provide for a uniform law between different states, or on the request of the state assembly concerned. The law in question must also be passed by the state assembly as well, except in the case of certain land law-related subjects. Non-Islamic issues that fall under the purview of the state may also be legislated on at the federal level for the purpose of conforming with Malaysian treaty obligations.
In some past federal-state disputes, such as in the 1966 Sarawak constitutional crisis and the 1977 Kelantan Emergency, the national government has seized control of state administration. The Internal Security Act 1960 and its replacement, the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012, provide broad power to the national government to make detentions in the name of security, which has been used to target political opponents.$^{:495}$ State rights can be suspended by the central government through the use of an Emergency Ordinance, and the central government can make state law.$^{:7}$
Through the creation of new institutions that duplicate state government services, the federal government has created a system of formal control over what are constitutionally state competencies.$^{:430–431,436}$ The National Council for Local Government provides a mechanism through which the central government controls local governments.$^{:7–8}$$^{:101}$ Local government is thus quite similar across the country,$^{:93}$ outside of Sabah and Sarawak, which each have distinct systems.$^{:98}$ State law can also be overridden by the national government if needed to implement an international agreement, except in matters relating to Islam and Malay customs.$^{:96}$ State control over oil and natural gas has been appropriated by the federal government.$^{:163}$ The federal government also has direct control over six local authorities designated as "development authorities". While some were turned into federal territory (Labuan and Putrajaya), two remain in Johor, one in Pahang, and one in Kedah.$^{:105–106}$ Overall, the power of the national government compared to the states, especially during the decades of BN rule, led the country to be sometimes described as effectively unitary with "federal features",$^{:194–195}$ or a country with "minimalist" federalism.$^{:163}$ This diminishment of state power reflected similar losses of power elsewhere, such as in the national legislature, the judiciary, the media, and civil society, as the power of the executive government grew.$^{:194–195}$
State parliaments can also request the national parliament to legislate for it, as has been done for the National Land Code 1966 and the Local Government Act 1976, which were requested by all states (although they do not apply to Sabah and Sarawak).$^{:95–96}$ Similarly, the national government can request that a state government exercise executive or administrative powers. Federalism is thus often a cooperative exercise between the central and state governments.$^{:96}$$^{:163}$

### Sabah and Sarawak

Sabah and Sarawak did not have strong historical, cultural, or demographic links to Malaya at the time of federation. They also had vastly different economic needs. Their admittance to the federation came with agreements that they would retain a larger ability to managed their own affairs to reflect this.$^{:491}$ Sabah and Sarawak have greater control of their land, development, immigration, native customs, religious affairs, historical sites, and ports and harbours.$^{:496,499}$ The relatively greater autonomy of Sabah and Sarawak means that Malaysian federalism is asymmetric.$^{:92}$ The states of Sabah and Sarawak merged with the existing states of the Federation of Malaya and Singapore pursuant to the Malaysia Agreement in 1963 to form the independent state of Malaysia. Representatives from Sabah and Sarawak demanded a higher degree of autonomy as part of the bargain which were included in the 20-point agreement and 18-point agreement respectively. While both states arguably joined the federation as equals to Malaya, the Malayan government and constitution became the Malaysian government and constitution. The constitutional amendment codifying the enlarged federation initially listed Sabah and Sarawak separately to the other states, however it was later amended again to list both these entities together with the other states, suggesting a status equal to the original states of Malaya. Sabah and Sarawak still retained a higher degree of autonomy than the peninsular states in areas such as immigration, state revenue, and legislative power over land and local government. However, federal influence over their politics increased over time, including direct interference in the state assemblies.
The East Malaysian states of Sabah and Sarawak have greater autonomy that those on the peninsula, including additional powers over their immigration controls as part of the 20-point agreement and 18-point agreement drawn up by the respective states when they formed Malaysia. Sabah and Sarawak have separate immigration policies and controls and a unique residency status. Passports are required even for Peninsular Malaysians for travelling between either state and Peninsular Malaysia, or between the two states, however those who are on social/business visits up to three months are allowed to produce a MyKad or birth certificate and obtain a special printout form in lieu of a passport. Sabah and Sarawak also have greater fiscal powers, their own legal systems, and vetos on constitutional changes. They are not required to have Islam as an official religion, and can determine their own official language.$^{:217}$
Sabah and Sarawak control immigration through the Immigration Act 1959/63.$^{:96}$ Their Governors have vetos over constitutional changes that affect their states, namely changes to the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak, to their state legislation, and to the rights of their indigenous people.$^{:148}$
Political relations between the Bornean states and the central government are often fraught, with the state governments fearing West Malaysian dominance, while the national government fears separatism.$^{:221}$ The historical erosion of autonomy has been linked to occasional calls for secession in both East Malaysian states, where such discussion is more common than it is in West Malaysian states. This is linked to the demographic and cultural differences already distinguishing these states from the others. While this discontent has sometimes been used by leaders in both states to extract concessions from the federal government, concessions have often been directly associated with particular East Malaysian politicians, rather than producing structural improvements.$^{:501–502}$

## State governance

The governance of the states is divided between the federal government and the state governments, while the federal territories are directly administered by the federal government.
Nine of the peninsular states, based on historical Malay kingdoms, are known as the Malay states. Each Malay state has a hereditary ruler as titular head of state The rulers of Johor, Kedah, Kelantan, Pahang, Perak, Selangor and Terengganu are styled Sultans. Negeri Sembilan's elective ruler holds the title of Yamtuan Besar, whereas the ruler of Perlis is titled Raja. Malacca, Penang, Sabah, and Sarawak have Governors$^{:93,105}$ (styled Yang di-Pertua Negeri)$^{:175}$ appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong. The federal head of state, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (commonly referred to as "King" in English), is elected (de facto rotated) among the nine hereditary rulers to serve a 5-year term.$^{:94}$ Despite being constitutional monarchs, the rulers have significant informal influence, and are associated with both the Malay ethnicity and Islam.$^{:215}$
States have an executive Chief Minister as politically responsible head of government.$^{:93}$ (In the Malay states chief ministers are known as Menteri Besar, while in Malacca, Penang, and Sabah they are referred to as ketua menteri. In Sarawak, the title "Premier" has been used since 2022).$^{:208}$$^{:106}$$^{:497}$
Each state has its own constitution, which must conform with the principles of the national constitution. Each state also has a Westminster-style unicameral legislature$^{:93}$ called the Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN), which vary in size between states from 15 members (Perlis) to 82 members (Sarawak). As with the federal parliament, members of DUN are elected through first-past-the-post voting in single-member constituencies$^{:497}$ drawn based on population. The state leader of the majority party in DUN is usually appointed Chief Minister by the Ruler or Governor. The term of DUN members is five years unless the assembly is dissolved earlier by the Ruler or Governor on the advice of the Chief Minister. Usually, DUN of the states in Peninsular Malaysia are dissolved in conjunction with the dissolution of the federal parliament, to have state elections running concurrently with the parliamentary election. However, Rulers and Governors hold discretionary powers in withholding consent to dissolve the DUN. Each state sends two senators elected by the DUN to the Dewan Negara (Senate), the upper house of the federal parliament. While the main court system is national, each state has its own Syariah Court system.$^{:215}$
Each state is divided into districts, which are then divided into mukim. In Sabah and Sarawak districts are grouped into "Divisions".

## Federal territory governance

The 3 federal territories were formed for different purposes: Kuala Lumpur is the national capital, Putrajaya is the administrative centre of the federal government, and Labuan serves as an offshore financial centre. Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya were carved out of Selangor, while Labuan was ceded by Sabah. The territories fall under the purview of the Ministry of the Federal Territories, and the Parliament of Malaysia legislates on all matters concerning the territories. Each federal territory elects representatives from single-member constituencies drawn based on population to the Dewan Rakyat (House of Representatives) of the Parliament. The Yang di-Pertuan Agong appoints senators to represent the territories in the Dewan Negara; Kuala Lumpur has two senators, while Putrajaya and Labuan each has one.
There are no subnational elections in the federal territories, even in Kuala Lumpur, whose governmental budget exceeds that of most states.$^{:501}$ The local governments for the territories varies: Kuala Lumpur is administered by the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur), headed by an appointed mayor (Datuk Bandar), while Putrajaya is administered by the Putrajaya Corporation (Perbadanan Putrajaya) and Labuan by the Labuan Corporation (Perbadanan Labuan); each corporation is headed by a chairman.

## Singapore and Brunei

Singapore was a Malaysian state from the formation of Malaysia on 16 September 1963 until it was expelled from the Federation on 9 August 1965. During its time as a state of Malaysia, Singapore had autonomy in the areas of education and labour and was the smallest state in Malaysia by land area, but the largest by population.
After the Second World War the United Kingdom sought to integrate Brunei with North Borneo and Sarawak, but the Bruneian Sultan was reluctant to cede political control or share oil revenues.$^{:17}$ When discussions took place about a larger union in the 1960s, Brunei invited to join the Federation but decided not to in the end due to several issues, such as the status of the Sultan within Malaysia, division of Bruneian oil royalties, and pressure from opposition groups which amounted to the Brunei Revolt.