# Open defecation

Part of a series on :
Pollution :
Air pollution from a factory :
Air
Acid rain
Air quality index
Atmospheric dispersion modeling
Chlorofluorocarbon
Combustion
Exhaust gas
Haze
Global dimming
Global distillation
Indoor air quality
Non-exhaust emissions
Ozone depletion
Particulates
Persistent organic pollutant
Smog
Soot
Volatile organic compound :
Biological
Biological hazard
Genetic
Illegal logging
Introduced species
Invasive species :
Digital
Information :
Electromagnetic
Light
Ecological
Overillumination
Radio spectrum :
Natural
Ozone
Radium and radon in the environment
Volcanic ash
Wildfire :
Noise
Transportation
Health effects from noise
Marine mammals and sonar
Noise barrier
Noise control
Soundproofing :
Radiation
Actinides
Bioremediation
Depleted uranium
Nuclear fission
Nuclear fallout
Plutonium
Poisoning
Radioactivity
Uranium
Radioactive waste :
Soil
Agricultural
Land degradation
Bioremediation
Defecation
Electrical resistance heating
Illegal mining
Soil guideline values
Phytoremediation :
Solid waste
Advertising mail
Biodegradable waste
Brown waste
Electronic waste
Foam food container
Food waste
Green waste
Hazardous waste
Industrial waste
Litter
Mining
Municipal solid waste
Nanomaterials
Plastic
Packaging waste
Post-consumer waste
Waste management :
Space
Space debris :
Thermal
Urban heat island :
Visual
Air travel
Advertising clutter
Overhead power lines
Traffic signs
Urban blight
Vandalism :
War
Chemical warfare
Herbicidal warfare
Agent Orange
Nuclear holocaust
Nuclear fallout
Nuclear famine
Nuclear winter
Scorched earth
Unexploded ordnance
War and environmental law :
Water
Agricultural wastewater
Biosolids
Diseases
Eutrophication
Firewater
Freshwater
Groundwater
Hypoxia
Industrial wastewater
Marine
Monitoring
Nonpoint source
Nutrient
Ocean acidification
Oil spill
Pharmaceuticals
Freshwater salinization
Septic tanks
Sewage
Shipping
Sludge
Stagnation
Sulfur water
Surface runoff
Turbidity
Urban runoff
Water quality
Wastewater :
Topics
History
Pollutants
Heavy metals
Paint :
Misc
Area source
Brain health and pollution
Debris
Dust
Garbology
Legacy
Midden
Point source
Waste
Toxic
Lists
Diseases
Law by country
Most polluted cities
Least polluted cities by PM2.5
Treaties
Most polluted rivers
Categories
By country :
Environment portal
Ecology portal :
vte :
Open defecation is the human practice of defecating outside ("in the open") rather than into a toilet. People may choose fields, bushes, forests, ditches, streets, canals, or other open spaces for defecation. They do so either because they do not have a toilet readily accessible or due to archaic traditional cultural practices. The practice is common where sanitation infrastructure and services are not available. Even if toilets are available, behavior change efforts may still be needed to promote the use of toilets. 'Open defecation free' (ODF) is a term used to describe communities that have shifted to using toilets instead of open defecation. This can happen, for example, after community-led total sanitation programs have been implemented.
Open defecation can pollute the environment and cause health problems and diseases. High levels of open defecation are linked to high child mortality, poor nutrition, poverty, and large disparities between rich and poor. Ending open defecation is an indicator being used to measure progress towards the Sustainable Development Goal Number 6. Extreme poverty and lack of sanitation are statistically linked. Therefore, eliminating open defecation is thought to be an important part of the effort to eliminate poverty.
In 2022, 420 million people (5.25% of the global population) were practicing open defecation, a significant decline from about 1.31 billion (21.42%) in 2000, representing a reduction of 890 million people or 16.17% points over 22 years. Of those practicing open defecation, 275 million (65.6%) were living in just seven countries. In India, for example, the number had decreased by 62%, (73%) in 2000 to (11%) in 2022, showcasing the country’s significant efforts to achieve Sustainable Development Goals by 2030.

## Overview

In ancient times, there were more open spaces and less population pressure on land, open defecation was a common practice which brought fewer health and hygiene problems. With development and urbanization, open defecating started becoming a challenge and thereby an important public health issue, and an issue of human dignity. With the increase in population in smaller areas, such as cities and towns, more attention was given to hygiene and health. As a result, there was an increase in global attention towards reducing the practice of open defecation.
Open defecation perpetuates the vicious cycle of disease and poverty and is widely regarded as an affront to personal dignity. The countries where open defecation is most widely practiced have the highest numbers of deaths of children under the age of five, as well as high levels of undernutrition, high levels of poverty, and large disparities between people of means and the poor.
* Indiscriminate waste dumping and open defecation (from animals), Shadda, Cap-Haitien, Haiti
* Evidence of open defecation along a riverbank in Bujumbura, Burundi
* Child defecating in the open in a canal in the slum of Gege in the city of Ibadan, Nigeria
* Open defecation, Tirin Kowt bazaar, Afghanistan

## Terminology

The term "open defecation" became widely used in the water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) sector from about 2008 onwards. This was due to the publications by the Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation (JMP) and the UN International Year of Sanitation. The JMP is a joint program by WHO and UNICEF that was earlier tasked to monitor the water and sanitation targets of the Millennium development goals (MDGs); it is now tasked to monitor Sustainable Development Goal Number 6.
For monitoring of the MDG Number 7, two categories were created: 1) improved sanitation and (2) unimproved sanitation. Open defecation falls into the category of unimproved sanitation. This means that people who practice open defecation do not have access to improved sanitation.
In 2013, World Toilet Day was celebrated as an official UN day for the first time. The term "open defecation" was used in high-level speeches, that helped to draw global attention to this issue (for example, in the "call to action" on sanitation issued by the Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations in March 2013).

### Open defecation free

"Open defecation free" (ODF) is a phrase first used in community-led total sanitation (CLTS) programs. ODF has now entered use in other contexts. The original meaning of ODF stated that all community members are using sanitation facilities (such as toilets) instead of going to the open for defecation. This definition was improved and more criteria were added in some countries that have adopted the CLTS approach in their programs to stop the practice of open defecation.
The Indian Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation in mid-2015 defined ODF as "the termination of fecal–oral transmission, defined by:
* No visible feces found in the environment or village and
* Every household as well as public/community institutions using safe technology option for disposal of feces".
Here, a "safe technology option" means a toilet that contains feces so that there is no contamination of surface soil, groundwater or surface water; flies or animals do not come in contact with the open feces; no one handles excreta; there is no smell and there are no visible feces around in the environment. This definition is part of the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan (Clean India Campaign).

## Reasons

The reasons for open defecation are varied. It can be a voluntary, semi-voluntary or involuntary choice. Most of the time, a lack of access to a toilet is the reason. However, in some places even people with toilets in their houses prefer to defecate in the open.
A few broad factors that result in the practice of open defecation are listed below.

### No toilet

Open defecation frequently occurs when people lack toilets in their houses, or in the areas where they live. Lack of toilets in places away from people's houses, such as in schools or on farms, also leads people to defecate in the open. Another example is a lack of public toilets in cities, whether by a reluctance among businesses to allow patrons to use their toilets or limited hours (e.g. if there are no 24-hour businesses in town and someone needs to use the toilet after regular business hours), which can be a big problem for homeless people.
In some rural communities, toilets are used for other purposes, such as storing household items, animals, or farm products or use as kitchens. In such cases, people go outside to defecate.

### Uncomfortable or unsafe toilet

Sometimes people have access to a toilet, but the toilet might be broken, or of poor quality – outdoor toilets (pit latrines in particular) typically are devoid of any type of cleaning and have strong unpleasant odors. Some toilets are not well lit at all times, especially in areas that lack electricity. Others lack doors or may not have water. Toilets with maggots or cockroaches are also disliked by people, so they go outside to defecate.
Some toilets are risky to access. There may be a risk to personal safety due to lack of lights at night, criminals around them, or the presence of animals such as snakes and dogs. Women and children who do not have toilets inside their houses are often found to be scared to access shared or public toilets, especially at night. Accessing toilets that are not located in the house might be a problem for disabled people, especially at night. In some parts of the world, Zambia for example, very young children are discouraged from using pit latrines due to the risk of them falling through the open drop-hole. In such cases when there is no other available sanitation facility, children are encouraged to practice open defecation. Some toilets do not have a real door, but have a cloth hung as a door. In some communities, toilets are located in places where women are shy to access them due to the presence of men.
Absence of supply of water inside or next to toilets cause people to get water from a distance before using the toilet. This is an additional task and needs extra time.
If too many people want to use a toilet at the same time, then some people may go outside to defecate instead of waiting. In some cases, people might not be able to wait due to diarrhea (or the result of an Inflammatory Bowel Disease emergency). In the case of home pit latrines, some people fear that their toilet pits will get filled very fast if all family members use them every day, so they continue to go outside to delay the toilet pit filling up.

### Unrelated to toilet infrastructure

Some communities have safe and accessible toilets, yet people prefer to defecate in the open. In some cases, these toilets are provided by the government or other organizations and people do not like them, do not value them, or do not know the benefits of using them. They continue to defecate in the open. Older people are often found to defecate in the open and are hesitant to change their behavior and go inside a closed toilet.
Some people prefer being in nature while defecating, as opposed to an enclosed space. This happens mostly in less populated or rural areas, where people walk outside early in the morning and go to defecate in the fields or bushes. In some cases there may be a cultural or habitual preference for open defecation. Some consider it a social activity, especially women who like to take some time to go out of their homes. While on their way to the fields for open defecation they can talk to other women and take care of their animals.
Open defecation is a part of people's life and daily habits in some regions. For instance, a 2011 survey in rural East Java, Indonesia, found that many men considered the practice 'normal', and having distinct benefits such as social interaction and physical comfort. In some cultures, there may be social taboos, such as a father-in-law may not use the same toilet as a daughter-in-law in the same household. Open defecation is a preferred practice in some parts of the world, with many respondents in a survey from 2015 stating that "open defecation was more pleasurable and desirable than latrine use". In some societies, open defecation is an intentional and widely used means of fertilization.
People with fecal incontinence can have abrupt 'emergencies' and not enough time to access a toilet, which can make open defecation their only option in such scenarios.

### Public defecation for other reasons

In developed countries, open defecation can be due to homelessness. Open defecation in developed areas is also considered to be a part of recreational outdoor activities such as camping in remote areas. It is difficult to estimate how many people practice open defecation in these communities.

## Prevalence and trends
### Countries with high numbers

The practice of open defecation is strongly related to poverty and exclusion particularly, in the case of rural areas and informal urban settlements in developing countries. The Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation (JMP) of UNICEF and WHO has been collecting data regarding open defecation prevalence worldwide. The figures are segregated by rural and urban areas and by levels of poverty. This program is tasked to monitor progress towards the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) relating to drinking water and sanitation. As open defecation is one example of unimproved sanitation, it is being monitored by JMP for each country, and results are published on a regular basis. The figures on open defecation used to be lumped together with other figures on unimproved sanitation but are collected separately since 2010.
The number of people practicing open defecation fell from 20% in 2000 to 12% in 2015.$^{:34}$ In 2016, the estimate was for 892 million people with no sanitation facility whatsoever and therefore practicing open defecation (in gutters, behind bushes, in open water bodies, etc.). Most people (9 of 10) who practice open defecation live in rural areas, but the vast majority lives in two regions (Central Africa and South Asia). In 2016, 76% (678 million) of the 892 million people practicing open defecation in the world lived in just seven countries.
Countries with Over 1 Million People Who Defecate openly are listed in the table below, based on available data from different years. :
| Year | Country | Total population as per respective year | Percentage and Number of people who defecate in the open |
| 2022 | Afghanistan | 40,578,842 | 9% or 3.6 million |
| 2022 | Angola | 35,635,029 | 17% or 6.1 million |
| 2022 | Benin | 13,759,501 | 49% or 6.4 million |
| 2022 | Bolivia | 12,077,154 | 9% or 1 million |
| 2022 | Burkina Faso | 22,509,038 | 34% or 7.6 million |
| 2022 | Cambodia | 17,201,724 | 12% or 2 million |
| 2022 | Cameroon | 27,632,771 | 4% or 1.1 million |
| 2022 | Central African Republic | 5,098,039 | 25% or 1.3 million |
| 2022 | Chad | 16,244,513 | 62.6% or 11 million |
| 2022 | China | 1,425,179,569 | 0.10% or 1.5 million |
| 2022 | Colombia | 51,737,944 | 2% or 1.2 million |
| 2022 | Democratic Republic of the Congo | 102,396,968 | 12% or 11.7 million |
| 2016 | Eritrea | 3,124,698 | 67% or 2.2 million |
| 2022 | Ethiopia | 125,384,287 | 17.6%–18% or 21.7 million |
| 2022 | Ghana | 33,149,152 | 17% or 5.7 million |
| 2022 | Haiti | 11,503,606 | 18% or 2 million |
| 2022 | India | 1,425,423,212 | 11% or 157 million |
| 2022 | Indonesia | 278,830,529 | 4.1% or 11.5 million |
| 2022 | Kenya | 54,252,461 | 6% or 3.4 million |
| 2022 | Laos | 7,559,007 | 16% or 1.2 million |
| 2022 | Liberia | 5,373,294 | 35% or 1.8 million |
| 2022 | Ivory Coast | 30,395,002 | 22% or 5.9 million |
| 2022 | Madagascar | 30,437,261 | 34% or 9.9 million |
| 2022 | Mali | 23,072,640 | 5% or 1 million |
| 2022 | Mauritania | 4,875,637 | 27% or 1.2 million |
| 2022 | Mozambique | 32,656,246 | 20% or 6.4 million |
| 2022 | Myanmar | 53,756,787 | 7% or 3.6 million |
| 2022 | Nepal | 29,715,436 | 7% or 2.1 million |
| 2022 | Niger | 25,311,973 | 64.9% or 17 million |
| 2022 | Nigeria | 223,150,896 | 18.4% or 40.3 million |
| 2022 | Pakistan | 243,700,667 | 6.7%–7% or 15.9 million |
| 2022 | Papua New Guinea | 10,203,169 | 16% or 1.6 million |
| 2022 | Philippines | 113,964,338 | 3% or 3.4 million |
| 2022 | Senegal | 17,651,103 | 8% or 1.3 million |
| 2022 | Sierra Leone | 8,276,807 | 16% or 1.4 million |
| 2022 | Somalia | 17,801,897 | 21% or 3.7 million |
| 2022 | South Sudan | 11,021,177 | 59.7% or 6.5 million |
| 2020 | Sudan | 46,789,231 | 17.3% or 7.6 million |
| 2022 | Tanzania | 64,711,821 | 6% or 4.1 million |
| 2022 | Togo | 9,089,738 | 39% or 3.4 million |
| 2022 | Uganda | 47,312,719 | 4% or 1.8 million |
| 2022 | Yemen | 38,222,876 | 8.5% or 2.8 million |
| 2022 | Zambia | 20,152,938 | 6% or 1.2 million |
| 2022 | Zimbabwe | 16,069,056 | 17% or 2.8 million |

### India

A report published by WaterAid stated that India had the highest number of people without access to basic sanitation despite efforts made by the Government of India under the Swachh Bharat Mission. About 433 million people, or approximately 33.14% of the population, practiced open defecation in India in 2014, despite having access to a toilet. Many factors contributed to this, ranging from poverty to government corruption.
Since then, through Swachh Bharat, a two-phase program managed by the Indian government, India has constructed around 100 million additional household toilets which would benefit 500 million people in India according to the statistics provided by Indian government (Phase 1: 2014–2019, Phase 2: 2020 to 2025). A campaign to build toilets in urban and rural areas achieved a significant reduction in open defecation between 2014 and 2019. In September 2019, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation honored Indian leader Narendra Modi for his efforts in improving sanitation in the country. According to UNICEF, the number of people without a toilet was reduced from 550 million to 50 million. There have also been reports of people not using the toilets despite having one, although according to the World Bank, 96% of Indians used the toilets they had. In October 2019, Modi declared India to be "open defecation free", though this announcement was met with skepticism by experts who cited slowly changing behaviors, maintenance issues, and water access issues as obstacles that continued to block India's goal of being 100% open defecation free. With the success of the Swachh Bharat Mission, Modi launched Phase 2 from 2020 to 2025. During Phase 2, the government is to focus on segregation of waste and further eliminating open defecation.

### Pakistan

In Pakistan, sanitation facilities are available to only about 42% of the population, 65% in urban areas and 30% in rural settlements in 2009. In 2017, WaterAid reported that 79 million people in Pakistan lacked access to a decent toilet. In 2018, 12% or 26 million people in Pakistan practiced open defecation, according to UNICEF. As of 2022, 7% or 15.92 million people in Pakistan practice open defecation, UNICEF reported.

### United States

In recent decades, a combination of factors has led to a dramatic decline in the availability of public restrooms in the United States. Once ubiquitous pay toilets, which charged a small fee per user, fell out of favor in the 1970s and were in most cases not replaced by free public restrooms. Public restrooms in American cities developed a reputation for unsanitary conditions, drug use, and vandalism, leading to many cities closing or restricting access to them.
The increase in homelessness nationwide has increased the need for public toilets, but many cities have closed public toilets due to concerns that homeless people would vandalize or use drugs in them. As a result, open defecation has been increasing in American cities.
In San Francisco, open defecation complaints for street feces increased fivefold from 2011 to 2018, with 28,084 cases reported. This was mainly due to the rising amount of homelessness in the city. San Francisco formed the Poop Patrol to deal with the problem. Similar problems were reported in Los Angeles and Miami.
The Mad Pooper was the name given to an unidentified woman who regularly defecated in public places while jogging during summer 2017 in the U.S. city of Colorado Springs.

## Impacts
### Public health

The negative public health impacts of open defecation are the same as those described when there is no access to sanitation at all. Open defecation—and lack of sanitation and hygiene in general—is an important cause of various diseases. The most common are diarrhea and intestinal worm infections, also including typhoid, cholera, hepatitis, polio, trachoma, and others.
Adverse health effects of open defecation occur because open defecation results in fecal contamination of the local environment. Open defecators are repeatedly exposed to many kinds of fecal bacteria like gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus and other fecal pathogens. This is particularly serious for young children whose immune systems and brains are not yet fully developed.
Certain diseases are grouped together under the name of waterborne diseases, which are diseases transmitted via fecal pathogens in water. Open defecation can lead to water pollution when rain flushes feces that are dispersed in the environment into surface water or unprotected wells.
Open defecation was found by the WHO in 2014 to be a leading cause of diarrheal death. In 2013, about 2,000 children under the age of five died every day from diarrhea.
Young children are particularly vulnerable to ingesting feces of other people that are lying around after open defecation, because young children crawl on the ground, walk barefoot, and put things in their mouths without washing their hands. Feces of farm animals are equally a cause of concern when children are playing in the yard.
Those countries where open defecation is most widely practiced have the highest numbers of deaths of children under the age of five, as well as high levels of malnourishment (leading to stunted growth in children), high levels of poverty, and large disparities between rich and poor.
Research from India has shown that detrimental health impacts (particularly for early life health) are even more significant from open defecation when the population density is high: "The same amount of open defecation is twice as bad in a place with a high population density average like India versus a low population density average like sub-Saharan Africa."
Open defecation badly harms health of children and their quality of life, including psychological issues.

### Safety of women

There are strong gender impacts connected with a lack of adequate sanitation. In addition to the universal problems associated with open defecation, having to urinate in the open can also be problematic for females. The lack of safe, private toilets makes women and girls vulnerable to violence and is an impediment to girls' education. Women are at risk of sexual molestation and rape as they search for places to urinate or defecate that are secluded and private, often during hours of darkness.
Lack of privacy has an especially large effect on the safety and sense of dignity of women and girls in developing countries. Facing the shame of having to urinate or defecate in public, they often wait until nightfall to relieve themselves. They risk being attacked after dark, meaning painfully holding their bladder and bowels all day. Women in developing countries increasingly express fear of assault or rape when having to leave the house after dark. Reports of attacks or harassment near or in toilet facilities, as well as near or in areas where women urinate or defecate openly, are common.

## Prevention

Strategies that can enable communities, both rural and peri-urban, to become completely open defecation free and remain so include: sanitation marketing, behavior change communication, and 'enhanced' community-led total sanitation ('CLTS + '), supplemented by "nudging".
Several drivers are used to eradicate open defecation, one of which is behavior change. SaniFOAM (Focus on Opportunity, Ability, and Motivation) is a conceptual framework that was developed specifically to address issues of sanitation and hygiene. Using focus, opportunity, ability and motivation as categories of determinants, the SaniFOAM model identifies barriers to latrine adoption while simultaneously serving as a tool for designing, monitoring and evaluating sanitation interventions. The following are some of the key drivers used to fight against open defecation in addition to behavior change:
* Political will
* Sanitation solutions that offer a better value than open defecation
* Stronger public sector local service delivery systems
* Creation of the right incentive structures

### Integrated initiatives

Efforts to reduce open defecation are more or less the same as those to achieve the MDG target on access to sanitation. A key aspect is awareness-raising (for example via the UN World Toilet Day at a global level), behavior change campaigns, and increasing political will and demand for sanitation. Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) campaigns have placed a particular focus on ending open defecation by "triggering" the communities themselves into action.

### Simple sanitation technology options

Simple sanitation technology options are available to reduce open defecation prevalence if the behavior is due to not having toilets in the household and shared toilets being too far or too dangerous to reach, e.g., at night.

#### Toilet bags

People might already use plastic bags (also called flying toilets) at night to contain their feces. However, a more advanced solution of the plastic toilet bag has been provided by the Swedish company People, which produces the "Peepoo bag", a "personal, single-use, self-sanitizing, fully biodegradable toilet that prevents feces from contaminating the immediate area as well as the surrounding ecosystem". This bag is being used in humanitarian responses, schools, and urban slums in developing countries.

#### Bucket toilets and urine diversion

Bucket toilets are a simple portable toilet option. They can be upgraded in various ways, one of them being urine diversion, which can make them similar to urine-diverting dry toilets. Urine diversion can significantly reduce odors from dry toilets. Examples of using this type of toilet to reduce open defecation are the "MoSan" toilet (used in Kenya) or the urine-diverting dry toilet promoted by SOIL in Haiti.

## Society and culture
### Media

The mainstream media in some affected countries, including India and Pakistan, have recently been publicizing the issue of open defecation.

### Legal status

In certain jurisdictions, open or public defecation is a criminal offense that can be punished with a fine or even imprisonment.

### In popular culture

David Sedaris' essay "Adventures at Poo Corner" dealt with people who openly defecate in commercial businesses.

### Open defecation during outdoor activities

Some national parks prohibit open defecation in some areas. If defecating openly, the general advice is to defecate into a dug hole, and cover with soil.