# Same-sex marriage in Alaska

"none" is preferred when the title is sufficiently descriptive; see [[WP:SDNONE]]
Part of the LGBTQ rights series :
Legal status of same-sex unions :
Marriage
Andorra
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Denmark
Ecuador
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Malta
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Portugal
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Thailand
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Recognized
Israel
United States:
 • American Samoa :
Civil unions or registered partnerships but not marriage
Bolivia
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Hungary
Italy
Latvia
Monaco
Montenegro
San Marino
United Kingdom:
 • Bermuda
 • Cayman Islands :
Minimal recognition
Bulgaria
Cambodia
China
 • Hong Kong
India
Japan
Lithuania
Namibia
Nepal
Netherlands:
 • Sint Maarten
Poland
Romania
Slovakia :
See also
Same-sex union legislation
Same-sex union court cases
Timeline of same-sex marriage
Recognition of same-sex unions in Africa
Recognition of same-sex unions in Asia
Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe
Recognition of same-sex unions in the Americas
Recognition of same-sex unions in Oceania
Marriage privatization
Divorce of same-sex couples
Domestic partnership
Military policy
Adoption
Listings by country
LGBTQ rights by country or territory :
Notes
1 2 Performed in the Netherlands proper (including the Caribbean Netherlands), as well as in Aruba and Curaçao. May be registered in Sint Maarten in such cases, but the rights of marriage are not guaranteed.
↑ Neither performed nor recognized in Niue, Tokelau, or the Cook Islands.
↑ Neither performed nor recognized in six British Overseas Territories.
1 2 Neither performed nor recognized in some tribal nations of the US. Recognized but not performed in several other tribal nations and American Samoa.
↑ Registered foreign marriages confer all marriage rights in Israel. Domestic common-law marriages confer most rights of marriage. Domestic civil marriage recognized by some cities.
1 2 3 4 5 The Coman v. Romania ruling of the European Court of Justice obliges the state to provide residency rights for the foreign spouses of EU citizens. Some member states, including Romania, do not follow the ruling.
↑ A "declaration of family relationship" is available in several of Cambodia's communes which may be useful in matters such as housing, but is not legally binding.
↑ Guardianship agreements confer some limited legal benefits in China, including decisions about medical and personal care.
↑ Hong Kong provides inheritance, guardianship rights, and residency rights for foreign spouses of legal residents.
↑ Indian courts have recognised guru–shishya, nata pratha or maitri karar–type contractual relationships, but they are not legally binding.
↑ Most Japanese cities and prefectures issue partnership certificates, but they are not legally binding.
↑ Marriages conducted abroad between a Namibian national and a foreign spouse provide residency rights in Namibia.
↑ Romania provides hospital visitation rights through a "legal representative" status. :
LGBTQ portal :
vte :
Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in Alaska since October 12, 2014, with an interruption from October 15 to 17 while state officials sought without success to delay the implementation of a federal court ruling. The U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska held on October 12 in Hamby v. Parnell that Alaska's statutory and constitutional bans on same-sex marriage violated the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the U.S. Constitution. On October 15, state officials obtained a two-day stay from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which the U.S. Supreme Court refused to extend on October 17. Although Alaska is one of a few states which enforces a three-day waiting period between requesting a marriage license and conducting a marriage ceremony, at least three same-sex couples had the waiting period waived immediately after the district court's ruling. They married in Utqiagvik and Ketchikan on October 13 and were the first same-sex couples to marry in Alaska.

## Legal history
### Statutes

After the Hawaii Supreme Court seemed poised to legalize same-sex marriage in Hawaii in Baehr v. Miike in 1993, Representative Norm Rokeberg introduced legislation (House Bill 227) to the Alaska House of Representatives in March 1995 to add language restricting marriage to "the union of one man and one woman" in state statutes. The bill passed the House in February 1996. In March 1996, Senator Lynda Green introduced Senate Bill 30 to the Alaska Senate, which restricted marriage to "a civil contract between one man and one woman" and forbade the recognition of same-sex marriages performed elsewhere. It passed the Senate and the House shortly thereafter. Governor Tony Knowles did not veto the bill, but allowed it to become law without his signature on May 6, 1996.
In February 2016, a bill to codify same-sex marriage in state statutes was introduced to the Alaska Legislature. It would have replaced all references to "husband and wife" across state statutes with the gender-neutral term "spouses". Representative Andy Josephson said that Obergefell v. Hodges, the U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide, was "not reflected in state laws". The bill died without a vote. A similar bill was introduced in January 2017, but also died without a vote.

### Constitution

In 1998, the Alaska Legislature passed Ballot Measure 2, a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, which was approved in a popular referendum on November 3, 1998. The amendment passed with 68% in favor and 32% opposed. The Alaska Civil Liberties Union attempted to prevent the referendum from proceeding, but in August 1998 the Alaska Superior Court held that the proposed referendum and accompanying ballot description were legally permissible.
Representative Andy Josephson filed a bill to repeal the ban in January 2023, which if approved would have been presented to voters in November 2024. Citing the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade, in June 2022, Josephson said, "The Supreme Court for the first time in history, has removed civil rights. And we would be foolish to just watch them do it and not intervene to protect the civil liberties of our own citizens." The bill failed to pass before the end of the legislative session.

### Lawsuits
#### Brause v. Alaska

In August 1994, Jay Brause and Gene Dugan, a same-sex couple from Anchorage, filed an application for a marriage license, which was denied by the Alaska Office of Vital Statistics. They filed suit in the Alaska Superior Court, arguing that their rights to privacy and equal protection—both of which are referenced in the Alaska Constitution—were violated by the office's refusal to allow them to marry. Superior Court Judge Peter Michalski ruled in February 1998 that "marriage, i.e., the recognition of one's choice of a life partner, is a fundamental right" and that "the state must...have a compelling interest that supports its decision to refuse to recognize the exercise of this fundamental right by those who choose same-sex partners rather than opposite-sex partners." Although the decision favored a right to same-sex marriage, it did not legalize the practice in the state or abolish Alaska's statutory ban on same-sex marriage. Rather, Judge Michalski directed the parties to set further hearings to determine whether a compelling state interest could be shown for Alaska's ban on same-sex marriage. Following the passage of Measure 2 in November 1998, the Alaska Supreme Court invalidated Brause and Dugan's claims, overturned the Superior Court's ruling in Brause, and dismissed the suit.
Brause and Dugan were married in Alaska 21 years later, on September 19, 2015, after the state's same-sex marriage ban was struck down in federal district court. Their wedding was held at the Pioneer School House in Anchorage. The couple married in Portland, Oregon in 2004 after Multnomah County began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, but the marriage was later annulled by the Oregon Supreme Court. They also held marriage ceremonies in South Africa in 2006 and in Yukon in 2007.

#### Schmidt and Schuh v. Alaska

On April 25, 2014, the Alaska Supreme Court ruled that the state must provide property tax exemptions to same-sex couples just as to married opposite-sex couples. The decision said: "For purposes of analyzing the effects of the exemption program, we hold that committed same-sex domestic partners who would enter into marriages recognized in Alaska if they could are similarly situated to those opposite-sex couples who, by marrying, have entered into domestic partnerships formally recognized in Alaska". On July 25, it ruled that denying survivor benefits to a deceased person's same-sex partner violated the survivor's right to equal protection.

#### Hamby v. Parnell

On May 12, 2014, five same-sex couples filed a lawsuit in federal district court, challenging the state's same-sex marriage ban. The suit named Governor Sean Parnell as the primary defendant. The state's brief, filed on June 19, said that the questions the plaintiffs raised were political, not legal. It said that under the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution "Alaska has the right as a sovereign state to define and regulate marriage" and "Alaska voters had a fundamental right to decide the important public policy issue of whether to alter the traditional definition of marriage as between one man and one woman." District Court Judge Timothy Burgess heard oral arguments on October 10.
On October 12, 2014, less than a week after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review similar cases from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Latta v. Otter and Sevcik v. Sandoval, Judge Burgess ruled for the plaintiffs and declared Alaska's statutory and constitutional bans on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. He issued an injunction effective immediately. The same day, Governor Parnell announced that he would appeal the ruling and "defend our constitution". The head of the state Bureau of Vital Statistics commented: "The license application begins the three-day waiting period before the license can be issued. All marriages in Alaska must have the marriage license issued before the ceremony is performed. We expect our office will be busy tomorrow [October 13] but we will make every effort to help customers as quickly as possible." In Utqiagvik, Magistrate Mary Treiber waived the state's three-day waiting period and married Kristine Hilderbrand and Sarah Ellis on October 13. They were the first same-sex couple to marry in Alaska. Another couple, Kelly Cahoon and Bernice Oyagak, were married in the same town later that day. A couple in Ketchikan, Chad Valadez and Jay Hochberg, also had the waiting period waived and were issued a license that day.
On October 13, the state asked the district court to issue a stay pending appeal, which was denied. On October 15, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the state's request for an indefinite stay, granting instead a temporary stay until October 17 to allow Alaska to attempt to obtain a longer stay from the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court denied a stay and same-sex couples resumed obtaining marriage licenses following the dissolution of the Ninth Circuit's temporary stay on October 17. On October 22, the appellants asked the Ninth Circuit for an initial hearing en banc. This request was denied on November 18, when no circuit judge called for a vote on the motion within the time period set by circuit rules.
On December 4, Attorney General Craig W. Richards was reported to be reviewing the case. Governor Bill Walker, who took office on December 1, said in a statement that he opposed spending on litigation with little chance of success. On February 9, 2015, the state asked the Ninth Circuit to stay proceedings pending action by the U.S. Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges. The court did so on February 27. Following the ruling in Obergefell legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide in the United States on June 26, 2015, the Ninth Circuit accepted on July 1 a joint notice to dismiss the appeal, filed by the state and the plaintiffs.

#### Smith v. Dunleavy et al

In 2019, Denali Nicole Smith filed suit in federal district court, alleging that the state was unlawfully enforcing statutes barring the recognition of same-sex marriages. Attorneys for Smith said she had been denied application for a state oil-wealth fund check, the Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD), because of her same-sex marriage. The lawsuit named Governor Mike Dunleavy and Attorney General Kevin Clarkson as defendants. In response, Governor Dunleavy said that "despite recent media reports to the contrary, neither the State of Alaska nor the Department of Revenue have a policy of denying PFDs based on same-sex marital status. The State's policy is that the unconstitutional statute currently on the books is not enforced, and if an individual is eligible under all the lawful criteria, he or she will receive a PFD." Attorney General Clarkson similarly stated that Smith should be eligible for a PFD, and the Department of Law opened an investigation into the case. Nicole Smith settled with the state, and the case was dismissed with prejudice by Judge H. Russel Holland on April 15, 2021.

## Alaska Native tribal entities

The Central Council of the Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska became the first tribal government in Alaska to legalize same-sex marriage, when its governing board voted unanimously in February 2015 to legalize same-sex marriage on their sovereign lands. The Council will also be responsible for any related divorces that may arise. While there are no records of same-sex marriages as understood from a Western perspective being performed among Alaska's indigenous peoples, there is evidence for identities and behaviours that may be placed on the LGBT spectrum. Many of these cultures recognized two-spirit individuals who were born male but wore women's clothing and performed everyday household work and artistic handiwork which were regarded as belonging to the feminine sphere. This two-spirit status allowed for marriages between two biological males or two biological females to be performed in some of these tribes. On the Pacific Northwest Coast, many indigenous peoples recognize such two-spirit individuals. The Tlingit refer to them as ḵʼatx̱áan (pronounced), the Haida people as ḵʼadx̱áan (pronounced), and the Tsimshian as ma̱hana̱ʼa̱x (pronounced).
Among the Aleut, an indigenous people living on the Aleutian Islands, two-spirit individuals wore women's clothing and "copied all aspects of the feminine role", with such authenticity that "strangers to the tribe were not able to distinguish them from biological women". They are known in their language as ayagigux̂ (pronounced). Marriages between ayagigux̂ and cisgender men, often a tribal chief, were commonplace, suggesting that such marriages had prestige value, "The husband regarded his ayagigux̂ as a major social accomplishment, and the family profited from association with their new wealthy in-law." Wealthy Aleut men usually maintained polygynous marriages, and so it is likely that the ayagigux̂ were not exclusive wives, but rather part of a polygynous marital relationship. Among the Yup'ik, male-bodied two-spirit people are known as arnaruaq (pronounced, while female-bodied two-spirit people are known as angutnguaq (pronounced). On St. Lawrence Island, two-spirit individuals, known as aghnaasiq (pronounced), wore women's clothing and occupied a cultural position as shamans, and were "regarded as especially powerful". The aghnaasiq could marry either men or women. The Alutiiq living on Kodiak Island believed that two-spirit individuals, known as arnauciq (pronounced), were "two persons united in one", that they were more gifted than ordinary people and more skilled "at the respective tasks of both sexes than either men or women". The arnauciq probably did not wear women's clothing, but rather men's clothing.

## Demographics and marriage statistics

Data from the 2000 U.S. census showed that 1,180 same-sex couples were living in Alaska. By 2005, this had increased to 1,644 couples, likely attributed to same-sex couples' growing willingness to disclose their partnerships on government surveys. Same-sex couples lived in all boroughs and census areas of the state, and constituted 0.9% of coupled households and 0.5% of all households in the state. Most couples lived in Anchorage, Fairbanks North Star and Matanuska-Susitna boroughs, but the regions with the highest percentage of same-sex couples were Denali (0.9% of all county households) and Bethel (0.8%). Same-sex partners in Alaska were on average younger than opposite-sex partners, and more likely to be employed. However, the average and median household incomes of same-sex couples were lower than different-sex couples, and same-sex couples were also far less likely to own a home than opposite-sex partners. More than 44% of same-sex couples in Alaska were raising children under the age of 18, with an estimated 1,335 children living in households headed by same-sex couples in 2005.
At least 716 same-sex marriages had been conducted in Alaska by the end of 2023. The 2020 U.S. census, which asked residents whether they were living with a "same-sex husband/wife/spouse", showed that there were 1,236 married same-sex couple households (466 male couples and 770 female couples) and 788 unmarried same-sex couple households in Alaska.
Number of marriages performed in Alaska :
| Year | Same-sex marriages | Opposite-sex marriages | Unspecified | Total marriages | % same-sex |
| 2014 | 31 | 5,469 | 72 | 5,572 | 0.56% |
| 2015 | 88 | 5,239 | 171 | 5,498 | 1.60% |
| 2016 | 81 | 5,045 | 156 | 5,282 | 1.53% |
| 2017 | 78 | 4,924 | 130 | 5,132 | 1.52% |
| 2018 | 78 | 4,756 | 115 | 4,949 | 1.58% |
| 2019 | 71 | 4,529 | 174 | 4,774 | 1.49% |
| 2020 | 61 | 3,884 | 232 | 4,177 | 1.46% |
| 2021 | 74 | 4,305 | 256 | 4,635 | 1.60% |
| 2022 | 81 | 4,425 | 299 | 4,805 | 1.69% |
| 2023 | 73 | 4,264 | 331 | 4,668 | 1.56% |

## State employee benefits and partnerships
### Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. Alaska

On October 28, 2005, the Supreme Court of Alaska ruled in Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. Alaska that state and local government programs violated the Alaska Constitution's equal protection provision by extending benefits to public employees' spouses but denying these same benefits to employees' domestic partners. The court held the programs unconstitutional because they denied benefits to people who are precluded, under Alaska's marriage laws, from becoming eligible to receive them.
On November 17, 2006, the Alaska House of Representatives voted 24–10 in favor of legislation ordering a non-binding referendum for a constitutional amendment to deny benefits to the same-sex partners of state employees. On November 20, the Alaska Senate passed the bill in a 12–3 vote, and Governor Sarah Palin signed it into law on December 20. On April 3, 2007, Alaska voters, with 52.8% in favor and 48.8% opposed, directed the Alaska Legislature to put a constitutional amendment denying benefits to the same-sex partners of state employees on the ballot. A bill to place such an amendment on the November 2008 ballot stalled, and was eventually never voted on.
Since January 1, 2007, Alaska has provided some limited benefits to the same-sex partners of state employees.

### Domestic partnerships

The city of Juneau provides domestic partnership benefits to same-sex couples.

## Public opinion

Public opinion for same-sex marriage in Alaska :
| Poll source | Dates administered | Sample size | Margin of error | Support | Opposition | Do not know / refused |
| Public Religion Research Institute | March 9 – December 7, 2023 | 155 adults | ? | 75% | 25% | <0.5% |
| Public Religion Research Institute | March 11 – December 14, 2022 | ? | ? | 70% | 30% | <0.5% |
| Public Religion Research Institute | March 8 – November 9, 2021 | ? | ? | 72% | 28% | <0.5% |
| Public Religion Research Institute | January 7 – December 20, 2020 | 186 adults | ? | 93% | 3% | 4% |
| Public Religion Research Institute | April 5 – December 23, 2017 | 287 adults | ? | 57% | 34% | 9% |
| Public Religion Research Institute | May 18, 2016 – January 10, 2017 | 573 adults | ? | 54% | 36% | 10% |
| Alaska Survey Research/Alaska Dispatch News | December 2016 | 750 adults | ± 3.6% | 69% | 23.5% | 7.5% |
| Public Religion Research Institute | April 29, 2015 – January 7, 2016 | 710 adults | ? | 60% | 34% | 6% |
| Public Religion Research Institute | April 2, 2014 – January 4, 2015 | 338 adults | ? | 54% | 35% | 11% |
| Edison Research | November 4, 2014 | ? | ? | 56% | 41% | 3% |
| New York Times/CBS News/YouGov | September 20 – October 1, 2014 | 593 likely voters | ± 5.0% | 50% | 36% | 14% |
| Public Policy Polling | July 31 – August 3, 2014 | 673 voters | ± 3.8% | 49% | 45% | 6% |
| Public Policy Polling | May 8–11, 2014 | 582 registered voters | ± 4.1% | 52% | 43% | 5% |
| Public Policy Polling | January 30 – February 1, 2014 | 850 registered voters | ± 3.4% | 47% | 46% | 7% |
| Public Policy Polling | February 4–5, 2013 | 1,129 voters | ± 2.9% | 43% | 51% | 6% |
The December 2016 survey conducted by the Alaska Survey Research for the Anchorage Dispatch News showed that 69% of Alaska adults supported same-sex marriage, while 23.5% were opposed and 7.5% were undecided. Support was strongest in Southeast Alaska at 76.3%, and in Anchorage at 75.8%. 85% of Democrats supported same-sex marriage, while 13% were opposed, and 50% of Republicans supported it, with 41% opposed.