# 2023 Wisconsin Supreme Court election

"none" is preferred when the title is already sufficiently detailed; see [[WP:SDNONE]]
Elections in Wisconsin :
Federal government
Presidential elections
1848
1852
1856
1860
1864
1868
1872
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Presidential primaries
Democratic
2000
2004
2008
2016
2020
2024
Republican
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
U.S. Senate elections
Class 1
1848
1851
1857
1863
1869
1875
1881
1887
1893
1899
1905
1911
1916
1922
1925 sp
1928
1934
1940
1946
1952
1957 sp
1958
1964
1970
1976
1982
1988
1994
2000
2006
2012
2018
2024
Class 3
1848
1849
1855
1861
1867
1872
1879
1881 sp
1885
1890
1891
1897
1903
1907 sp
1909
1914
1918 sp
1920
1926
1932
1938
1944
1950
1956
1962
1968
1974
1980
1982
1986
1992
1998
2004
2010
2016
2022
2028
U.S. House of Representatives elections
1848
1850
1852
1854
1856
1858
1860
1862
1863
2nd sp
1864
1866
1868
1870
2nd sp
1872
1874
1876
1878
1880
1882
1884
1886
5th sp
1887
8th sp
1888
1890
1892
1893
4th sp
1894
7th sp
1896
1898
1900
1902
1904
1906
2nd sp
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
6th sp
11th sp
1920
1922
1924
1926
1928
1930
6th sp
1931
1st sp
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
1941
1st sp
1942
1944
1946
1947
2nd sp
1948
1950
1952
1953
9th sp
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1969
7th sp
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1979
6th sp
1980
1982
1984
4th sp
1986
1988
1990
1992
1993
1st sp
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
7th sp
2022
2024
8th sp
2026 :
State government
General elections
1995
2000
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Gubernatorial elections
1848
1849
1851
1853
1855
1857
1859
1861
1863
1865
1867
1869
1871
1873
1875
1877
1879
1881
1884
1886
1888
1890
1892
1894
1896
1898
1900
1902
1904
1906
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
1920
1922
1924
1926
1928
1930
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
1942
1944
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2012 (recall)
2014
2018
2022
2026
Lieutenant Gubernatorial elections
1942
1968
2012 (recall)
Secretary of State elections
1978
2014
2018
2022
2026
Attorney General elections
2014
2018
2022
Treasurer elections
2014
2022
Superintendent elections
2013
2017
2021
2025
State Senate elections
1934
1996
2008
2010
2011 (recall)
2012 (recall)
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
2026
State Assembly elections
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
2026
Supreme Court elections
2008
2009
2011
2013
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2023
2025 :
Ballot measures
2006Referendum 1
2025Question 1 :
Green Bay
Mayoral elections
1995
1999
2003
2007
2011
2015
2019
2023 :
Madison
Mayoral elections
1997 sp
1999
2003
2007
2011
2015
2019
2023 :
Milwaukee
Mayoral elections
1910
1912
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2022 sp
2024 :
Kenosha
Mayoral elections
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024 :
vte :
The 2023 Wisconsin Supreme Court election was held on Tuesday, April 4, 2023, to elect a justice to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for a ten-year term. Milwaukee County circuit judge Janet Protasiewicz defeated former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice Daniel Kelly, effectively flipping the ideological balance of the court from a conservative to liberal majority.
Incumbent justice Patience D. Roggensack chose to retire after 20 years on the court; she had identified as a conservative and voted consistently with the conservative 4–3 majority on the court. Protasiewicz and Kelly advanced from the February 21 nonpartisan primary, receiving 46% and 24% of the votes, respectively. Although Wisconsin Supreme Court justices are officially nonpartisan, Kelly was identified as being the Republican-aligned candidate and Protasiewicz the Democratic-aligned candidate. Other candidates in the 2023 primary included conservative Waukesha County circuit judge Jennifer Dorow and liberal Dane County circuit judge Everett Mitchell.
The race was widely considered to be a de facto referendum on legal abortion access in Wisconsin, but election coverage also often focused on how the court would rule on future cases involving politically charged issues of voting rights and redistricting. This election also took place in the aftermath of Donald Trump's false claims of fraud in the 2020 presidential election, with some national journalism focusing on how the outcome of the election could decide how the court would rule if a similar attempt were made to overturn the 2024 election. The election was described as the most important 2023 U.S. election; it became the most expensive judicial race to that point in history, with over $45 million ultimately spent. Wisconsin Democratic Party chair Ben Wikler called it "the most important election nobody's ever heard of."
Protasiewicz won the election by 11.02 percentage points, which flipped the court to a liberal majority. Kelly lost by a slightly wider margin than his own defeat three years prior. Protasiewicz took office on August 1, 2023.

## Primary election
### Candidates
#### Advanced

* Daniel Kelly, former justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court (2016–2020)
* Janet Protasiewicz, judge of the Milwaukee County Circuit Court (Branch 24)

#### Eliminated in primary

* Jennifer Dorow, judge of the Waukesha County Circuit Court (Branch 2)
* Everett Mitchell, judge of the Dane County Circuit Court (Branch 4)

### Fundraising

Campaign finance reports as of February 13, 2023 :
| Candidate | Raised | Spent | Cash on hand |
| Jennifer Dorow | $756,000 | $405,056 | $267,133 |
| Daniel Kelly | $467,000 | $229,000 | $202,000 |
| Everett Mitchell | $223,000 | $103,000 | $121,000 |
| Janet Protasiewicz | $2,200,000 | $735,000 | $277,000 |

### Advertising

On January 20, 2023, Janet Protasiewicz became the first candidate to announce a purchase of TV ads, allocating $700,000 for ads to air in the three weeks leading up to the February 21 primary. The ads, which began airing on January 26, highlight Protasiewicz's support for abortion rights and feature women warning “extremists want to ban abortion. Even in cases of rape and health of the mother.” Fair Courts America, a conservative advocacy group funded by megadonors Richard and Elizabeth Uihlein, simultaneously spent $250,000 on radio ads in support of Daniel Kelly. Fair Courts America then launched a $500,000 TV ad campaign in support of Kelly on February 2. The ads warn “Madison liberals are trying to take over the Wisconsin Supreme Court. That’s why we need to elect conservative Justice Dan Kelly.” Fair Courts America later increased their advertising budget for Kelly to $2.4 million.
Also in early February, the progressive group A Better Wisconsin Together announced a purchase of ads opposing Jennifer Dorow, including $720,000 for TV ads and $110,000 for digital ads. They later increased their ad budget to $1.9 million. The ads accuse Dorow of having "a long history of keeping criminals, even sexual predators, out of prison." Daily Kos theorized that A Better Wisconsin Together, which is affiliated with the national group ProgressNow, believed that Dorow would be more difficult to defeat and was trying to prevent her from reaching the April general election. On the same day, Dorow announced her first TV ad campaign, a $60,000 buy highlighting her service in the trial of Darrell Brooks. Dorow later increased her ad spending to $400,000, and the advocacy group Conservative Action for America followed up with a $246,000 buy in support of her.
Protasiewicz released two additional ads on February 7 which stressed her support for fairness and public safety and poked fun at the difficulty of pronouncing her surname. Two conservative groups, Wisconsin Alliance for Reform and Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce, simultaneously spent a combined $770,000 on a commercial portraying Protasiewicz as weak on crime. Protasiewicz hit back on February 10 with an ad defending her history as a prosecutor and accusing Dorow and Kelly of representing child predators during their time as defense attorneys. This brought her total ad spending to $1.25 million. Protasiewicz's fundraising advantage allowed her to run an ad during the 2023 Super Bowl, the only candidate in the race to do so.
On February 14, Women Speak Out PAC, which is affiliated with Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, announced it would spend "six figures" on pro-Kelly ads highlighting his opposition to abortion. Kelly and Everett Mitchell did not air any ads themselves, and no outside groups ran ads in support of Mitchell. In total, over $9 million was spent in the primary.

### Endorsements
#### State officials

* Patience Roggensack, incumbent justice
* Jon Wilcox, former justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court (1992–2007)

#### State legislators

* Devin LeMahieu, majority leader of the Wisconsin Senate

#### Organizations

* Wisconsin Right to Life PAC (co-endorsement with Kelly)

#### Federal officials

* Glenn Grothman, U.S. representative for Wisconsin's 6th congressional district (2014–present)

#### State officials

* Rebecca Bradley, Wisconsin Supreme Court justice
* Shelley Grogan, Wisconsin appeals court judge

#### Organizations

* Wisconsin Right to Life PAC (co-endorsement with Dorow)

#### State officials

* Louis Butler, former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice (2004–2008)
* Jim Doyle, former governor of Wisconsin (2003–2011)

#### Organizations

* Citizen Action (co-endorsement with Protasiewicz)

#### Labor unions

* Communications Workers of America (co-endorsement with Protasiewicz)

#### Federal officials

* Herb Kohl, former U.S. senator from Wisconsin (1989–2013)

#### State officials

* Ann Walsh Bradley, Wisconsin Supreme Court justice
* Rebecca Dallet, Wisconsin Supreme Court justice

#### Organizations

* Citizen Action (co-endorsement with Mitchell)
* EMILY's List

#### Labor unions

* AFSCME
* American Federation of Teachers
* Brotherhood of Carpenters
* Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
* Communications Workers of America (co-endorsement with Mitchell)
* Laborers' Union
* United Auto Workers

### Forums

2023 Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate forums :
| No. | Date | Host | Moderator | Link | Candidates | Candidates | Candidates | Candidates |
| Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | | | | |
| Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | Jennifer Dorow | Daniel Kelly | Everett Mitchell | Janet Protasiewicz |
| 1 | January 9, 2023 | State Bar of Wisconsin Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty | JR Ross Emilee Fannon | YouTube | P | P | P | P |

### Primary results

Observers saw the February 21 primary as a contest between Kelly and Dorow, as Protasiewicz was widely expected to win a plurality. Kelly won second place over Dorow through his commanding victories in Wisconsin's rural areas. Dorow was strongest in the vote-rich Milwaukee suburbs, but found little support outside of southeast Wisconsin. The two more liberal candidates won a combined 54% of the vote, while the two more conservative candidates won a combined 46% of the vote.
2023 Wisconsin Supreme Court primary election :
| Candidate | Candidate | Votes | % |
| Janet Protasiewicz | Janet Protasiewicz | 446,403 | 46.42% |
| Daniel Kelly | Daniel Kelly | 232,751 | 24.20% |
| Jennifer Dorow | Jennifer Dorow | 210,100 | 21.85% |
| Everett Mitchell | Everett Mitchell | 71,895 | 7.48% |
| Write-in | Write-in | 516 | 0.05% |
| Total votes | Total votes | 961,665 | 100.0% |

## General election
### Advertising

Campaign spending was greater than any judiciary race in United States history, with outside political action committees accounting for more than two thirds of total expenditures. The Protasiewicz campaign raised $12 million and received $11.3 million in outside spending; her opponent raised $2.2 million and received $15.4 million in outside spending. Early and large donations to Protasiewicz via the Democratic Party enabled her campaign to start airing ads weeks before Kelly. Her opponent received the bulk of his support through dark money PACs, including $5.3 million in spending by PACs controlled by conservative billionaires Richard and Elizabeth Uihlein, and $5.2 million in spending by PACs controlled by the business lobby Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce.
Two days after the primary election, Janet Protasiewicz spent at least $135,000 on two new ads. The first continued her previous criticism of Daniel Kelly for representing child predators as a defense attorney, while the second claims he would uphold Wisconsin's abortion ban if elected to the Supreme Court. A Better Wisconsin Together simultaneously booked an additional $500,000 worth of ads in support of Protasiewicz. Protasiewicz's ad spending quickly swelled; by February 27, it had reached $5.4 million. A Better Wisconsin later increased their ad budget to $1.3 million, with one ad hitting Kelly for a past comment he made comparing social security to slavery.
On February 27, Fair Courts America booked close to $1 million worth of ads labeling Protasiewicz as soft on crime. Fair Courts America booked another $550,000 worth of ads on March 6. Meanwhile, the conservative group Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce spent $3.2 million in its opening buy, running ads accusing Protasiewicz of issuing low sentences in sexual assault cases. On March 6, Protasiewicz spent an additional $460,000 on ads. One of her ads claimed that Kelly had taken a bribe to un-recuse himself from a case, an accusation that Kelly denied. Another ad accused him of participating in plans to appoint fake electors in 2020 due to Donald Trump's false claims of fraud in the presidential election.
As of March 7, liberal groups had spent nearly twice as much as conservative groups in the general election. Protasiewicz had spent over $7 million, buoyed by an additional $1.7 million from A Better Wisconsin Together; Kelly had not aired any ads himself, instead relying on $3.2 million from Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce and $1.7 million from Fair Courts America. By March 15, Protasiewicz had spent $9.1 million and A Better Wisconsin Together had spent $2 million while Kelly still had yet to purchase any ads, though Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce had spent $3.4 million and Fair Courts America had spent $2.3 million. There were three times as many Protasiewicz ads on TV compared to Kelly ads, as ad rates are significantly cheaper for candidates than they are for PACs.
In mid-March, Kelly made a $150,000 ad buy, his first of the entire campaign, while Everytown for Gun Safety made a $425,000 purchase in support of Protasiewicz on March 20.

### Post-primary endorsements
#### Federal officials

* Ron Johnson, U.S. senator from Wisconsin (2011–present)
* Glenn Grothman, U.S. Representative for Wisconsin's 6th congressional district (2015–present)

#### State executive officials

* Scott Walker, 45th governor of Wisconsin (2011–2019)

#### State judicial officials

* Jennifer Dorow, Waukesha County circuit court judge and 3rd-place finisher in the primary election
* Greg Gill, Wisconsin Court of Appeals District III
* Mark Gundrum, Wisconsin Court of Appeals District II
* Thomas Hruz, Wisconsin Court of Appeals District III
* Maria S. Lazar, Wisconsin Court of Appeals District II
* Pat Roggensack, Wisconsin Supreme Court justice
* Annette Ziegler, Chief Justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court

#### Organizations

* Milwaukee Police Association
* NRA Political Victory Fund
* Wisconsin Farm Bureau
* Wisconsin Fraternal Order of Police
* Wisconsin Republican Party

#### U.S. executive branch officials

* Hillary Clinton, former U.S. Secretary of State, former U.S. senator from New York, and former First Lady of the United States
* Eric Holder, former United States Attorney General

#### Federal officials

* Tammy Baldwin, U.S. senator from Wisconsin (2013–present)
* Herb Kohl, former U.S. senator from Wisconsin (1989–2013)
* Gwen Moore, U.S. representative from Wisconsin's 4th congressional district (2005–present)
* Mark Pocan, U.S. representative from Wisconsin's 2nd congressional district (2013–present)

#### State officials

* Ellen R. Brostrom, Wisconsin circuit court judge and daughter of the outgoing justice Patience Roggensack
* Louis Butler, former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice (2004–2008)
* Jill Karofsky, Wisconsin Supreme Court justice

#### Organizations

* End Citizens United
* Human Rights Campaign
* Jewish Democratic Council of America
* NARAL Pro-Choice America
* National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare
* People for the American Way
* Planned Parenthood Wisconsin
* Wisconsin Democratic Party

#### Labor unions

* Wisconsin Building Trades Council

#### Newspapers

* Wisconsin State Journal

### Debates

2023 Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate debates :
| No. | Date | Host | Moderator | Link | Candidates | Candidates |
| Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | | |
| Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Not invited  I Invited W Withdrawn | Daniel Kelly | Janet Protasiewicz |
| 1 | March 21, 2023 | State Bar of Wisconsin WISC-TV WisPolitics.com | JR Ross Susan Siman Emilee Fannon Will Kenneally | YouTube | P | P |

### Results

2023 Wisconsin Supreme Court general election :
| Candidate | Candidate | Votes | % | ± |
| Janet Protasiewicz | Janet Protasiewicz | 1,021,822 | 55.43% | N/A |
| Daniel Kelly | Daniel Kelly | 818,391 | 44.39% | −0.31pp |
| Write-in | Write-in | 3,267 | 0.18% | +0.11pp |
| Majority | Majority | 203,431 | 11.04% | +0.55pp |
| Total votes | Total votes | 1,843,480 | 100.0% | +18.96pp |

#### By congressional district

Protasiewicz won four of eight congressional districts, including two that were represented by Republicans.
| District | Kelly | Protasiewicz | Representative |
| 1st | 47% | 53% | Bryan Steil |
| 2nd | 23% | 77% | Mark Pocan |
| 3rd | 45% | 55% | Derrick Van Orden |
| 4th | 21% | 79% | Gwen Moore |
| 5th | 59% | 41% | Scott L. Fitzgerald |
| 6th | 53% | 47% | Glenn Grothman |
| 7th | 55% | 45% | Tom Tiffany |
| 8th | 52% | 48% | Mike Gallagher |

## Aftermath
### Analysis

The result, percentage-wise, repeated much of Kelly's performance in his unsuccessful 2020 bid for the Court. Protasiewicz won by 11 percentage points. Protasiewicz became the first Democratic-endorsed candidate to win the city of Waukesha in several election cycles, with Kelly underperforming his 2020 performance in Waukesha County, a historic GOP suburban stronghold. The Democratic Party of Wisconsin and other liberal groups invested heavily in organizing voters in Dane County as well as the WOW counties (Waukesha, Ozaukee, and Washington). In Ozaukee, Kelly won by five percentage points, compared to Mitt Romney's 30-point win of the county in his 2012 campaign for president.
Statewide turnout in the second round, despite being higher than usual for a spring election in an odd-numbered year, was lower than in the 2016 second round. However, turnout rose in 10 counties, including Dane, which recorded 23,000 more votes than in 2016, while Milwaukee County had the largest decline, casting 45,000 fewer votes than in 2016.
Analysts believed that Protasiewciz's victory challenged long-held traditions among judicial candidates. Instead of presenting herself as nonpartisan, Protasiewicz made her support for abortion rights and her opposition to gerrymandering a centerpiece of her campaign, even calling the Republican-drawn state legislative maps "rigged" and "unfair." In contrast, Kelly gave less specifics about his political positions during the campaign, but had a record of anti-abortion and anti-LGBTQ statements, in addition to working for the Wisconsin Republican Party in 2020 as a part of the attempt to overturn the presidential election. Kelly had heavily criticized Protasiewicz during the campaign for running on political issues, calling her a "politician in a black robe". Protasiewicz argued that judicial candidates should be open about their political beliefs, saying that "rather than reading between the lines and having to do your sleuthing around...I would rather just let people know what my values are."

### Impact

Protasiewicz won a decisive victory, flipping the ideological balance of the court to a liberal majority. The court is expected to rule on abortion rights and gerrymandering in Wisconsin. Kelly acknowledged his defeat, but he refused to concede to Protasiewicz by name, stating that he had an "unworthy" opponent.
The election was also seen as a culmination of a series of partisan involvements in Wisconsin Supreme Court elections going back to Michael Gableman's 2008 defeat of incumbent justice Louis B. Butler, which was the first defeat of an incumbent justice since 1967. Gableman's win, which flipped the balance to the right, began a series of high-profile conservative wins for the court in 2011, 2015 and 2019, which defended many of the policies of Governor Scott Walker's Republican trifecta (including 2011 Wisconsin Act 10) and later served as a foil for the policies of Tony Evers. The string of conservative victories was interrupted by the 2018 election of liberal candidate Rebecca Dallet and again by the 2020 election of liberal candidate Jill Karofsky, who defeated then-incumbent conservative justice Kelly and narrowed the conservative majority to one seat.
Protasiewicz joined the court on August 1, 2023. The new liberal-majority court was expected to address the state's abortion ban quickly. A lawsuit against the ban filed by Democratic Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul will be heard in a Dane County circuit court in May 2023 and was expected to be appealed to the state supreme court later in the year. Additionally, Law Forward president Jeffrey Mandell pledged to file a lawsuit against the state's legislative and congressional maps the day after Protasiewicz was seated. Mandell followed through on his promise, filing a lawsuit on August 2 that challenged Wisconsin's maps. Protasiewicz sided with the other three liberals on the court in a December 2023 decision striking down the legislative district maps on technical grounds. New maps were adopted for the 2024 election.