# Islamophobia in Bangladesh

Islam in Bangladesh :
History
Muslim conquest
Islamic rule
Bengal Sultanate
Bengal Subah
Anjuman-i-Ulama-i-Bangala :
Culture
Architecture
Bangladeshi
Bengali
Indo-Islamic
Indo-Saracenic
Mughal
Literature
Arabic
Bengali
Dobhashi
Jangnama
Kissa
Marsiya
Puthi
Persian
Urdu
Music
Ghazal
Hamd
Nashid
Naat
Qawwali
Zari
Zikir :
Major figures
Bakhtiyar Khalji
Shah Jalal
Khan Jahan Ali
Shah Makhdum
Titumir
Shariatullah
Karamat Ali Jaunpuri
Sher-e-Bangla
Siraji
Nazrul
Bhashani :
Communities
Bengali Muslims
Deshi
Dhakaiyas
Kan
Mahifarash
Mahimal
Nashya Shaikh
Shershabadia
Sylhetis
Rohingyas
Bihari Muslims
Pangals :
Ideology/schools of thought
Ahl-i Hadith
Barelvi/Rezvi
Deobandi/Qawmi
Fultali
Maizbhandari
Shia :
Educational organizations
Alia Madrasa
Qawmi madrasa
Bangladesh Madrasah Education Board
Islamic University, Bangladesh
International Islamic University Chittagong :
Political parties
Bangladesh Khelafat Majlish
Bangladesh Khilafat Andolan
Islami Andolan
Islami Front
Islami Oikya Jote
Jamaat-e-Islami
Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam
Khelafat Majlish
Muslim League
Nizam-e-Islam Party
Tariqat Federation
National Revolutionary Council :
Influential bodies
Anjuman Mufidul Islam
Hefazat-e-Islam
Islamic Foundation Bangladesh
Tablighi Jamaat
Tamaddun Majlish :
Other topics
Bishwa Ijtema
Waz Mahfil
Mosques in Bangladesh (Baitul Mukarram)
Muslim nationalism in South Asia
Muslim chronicles for Bangladeshi history
Sufism in Bangladesh :
vte :
Islamophobia in Bangladesh refers to discrimination, prejudice, or hostility directed towards Islam and Muslims within Bangladesh. While Bangladesh is a Muslim-majority country, incidents of anti-Islamic sentiment, attacks on religious institutions, and legal or political actions perceived as discriminatory have occurred. Tensions between secularism and religious identity continue to shape discussions on Islamophobia. The extent of anti-Islamic sentiment varies, often influenced by political, social, and global factors.

## History
### 2013 Shahbag vs Shapla

The Shahbag movement, which began in early 2013, demanded the death penalty for 1971 war criminals, particularly leaders of Jamaat-e-Islami. While framed as a call for justice, the movement displayed Islamophobic tendencies through its rhetoric and actions against Islamic groups. Protesters widely labeled Islamic scholars and organisations as extremists, calling for the banning of Jamaat-e-Islami and Qawmi madrasa reforms. Many activists and bloggers associated with the movement made derogatory remarks about Islamic beliefs, fueling religious tensions.
In contrast, when Hefazat-e-Islam, a madrasa-based group, held a protest at Shapla Chattar on 5–6 May 2013, demanding the protection of Islamic values, the government responded with a violent crackdown, resulting in numerous deaths and arrests. This stark difference in treatment between Shahbagh protesters and Islamic activists highlighted institutional bias. Additionally, mainstream media glorified Shahbagh while portraying Hefazat as extremist, reinforcing negative stereotypes about Islamic movements. These events deepened societal divisions and fueled long-term grievances among religious groups in Bangladesh.

### Controversy Over the New Curriculum

In 2023, Bangladesh government introduced a new curriculum for students in grades six and seven, which was met with widespread controversy and protests from various religious and cultural groups. Critics argue that the revised textbooks deliberately omit Islamic history, heritage, and contributions while promoting non-Islamic traditions disproportionately.
One of the primary concerns raised is the alleged Islamophobic nature of the curriculum. Observers note that textbooks extensively discuss Hindu and Buddhist heritage, including detailed descriptions of deities, temples, religious practices, and historical contributions. In contrast, Islamic heritage appears to be marginalised, with minimal references to Muslim rulers, scholars, and cultural contributions to Bengal. The history textbooks reportedly categorise Muslim rule in Bengal alongside British and Mauryan rule, labeling them as "foreign dominations" without recognising the socio-political and cultural impact of Islamic governance. Additionally, figures like Bakhtiyar Khilji are described as invaders rather than contributors to Bengal's historical transformation.
Further concerns have been raised regarding depictions of religious practices and beliefs. Critics argue that while the books contain multiple references and images of Hindu and Buddhist religious sites, Islamic landmarks such as mosques are largely excluded or relegated to minor mentions. Some scholars have pointed out that references to Islamic movements, including the role of Muslim scholars in anti-colonial resistance, have been either minimised or omitted entirely.
Beyond historical content, concerns extend to scientific and social subjects. The new science curriculum presents the theory of evolution in a way that some Islamic scholars claim contradicts Islamic teachings, particularly regarding human origins. The presence of cultural themes perceived as promoting liberal Western values, such as music and dance, has also been a source of contention. Some conservative groups argued that these elements indirectly promote secularism over Islamic principles.
In response to these controversies, religious organisations, teachers, and Islamic scholars staged protests, demanding a revision of the curriculum to better reflect Bangladesh's Muslim majority identity. Some groups have accused the government of intentionally fostering an anti-Islamic sentiment through the education system. Meanwhile, the government and curriculum developers maintain that the revisions were made to create an inclusive and modern education framework.
The debate over the curriculum reflects broader tensions regarding secularism, religious identity, and education policy in Bangladesh. While supporters argue that the curriculum aims to foster inclusivity and historical accuracy, detractors claim it represents a systemic effort to dilute Islamic heritage and identity within the national education framework. The controversy continues to spark discussions on religious representation in Bangladesh's academic discourse and the role of Islam in shaping national identity.

## Instances
### Political and legal context

While the state officially recognises Islam, there have been political and legal measures that some Islamist groups perceive as Islamophobic. For example, calls to remove Islam as the state religion have sparked debates on religious identity. In 2016, a legal petition challenging Islam's status as the state religion was dismissed by the Supreme Court, but discussions on secularism versus religious identity remain ongoing.

### Religious and cultural tensions

Certain secularist groups have been accused of promoting anti-Islamic rhetoric, particularly in the aftermath of violent attacks on bloggers and activists. In 2013, protests erupted over the demand for the death penalty for Islamist leaders accused of war crimes, leading to accusations that government policies were targeting religious figures.

### Anti-Islamic attacks and hate speech

There have been isolated incidents of attacks on mosques and religious scholars. In some cases, Islamic educational institutions (madrassas) have faced scrutiny, with allegations of radicalisation leading to restrictive policies. Hate speech against conservative Islamic practices has also been documented, especially on social media platforms.

## Media and social perceptions

Islamist groups have often criticized sections of the media for allegedly promoting Islamophobic narratives. Satirical content, controversial artworks, or statements perceived as disrespectful to Islamic beliefs have led to protests and legal action. The role of Western influence in shaping anti-Islamic discourse is also debated.

## Government and public response

The Bangladeshi government has largely denounced acts of Islamophobia while maintaining a stance on secular governance. Public opinion is divided, with some advocating for stricter religious policies and others supporting a more secular approach to governance.