# Votes on the death of Louis XVI

A series of votes were held at the end of the trial of Louis XVI to determine his guilt and the appropriate punishment. After voting on two initial questions on Tuesday 15 January 1793, the députés considered sentencing over 37 uninterrupted hours of debate on Wednesday 16 and Thursday 17 January. Pierre Victurnien Vergniaud was president during these sessions.

## Questions

The debate on Monday 14 January was occupied with determining the wording of the resolutions to be voted on.$^{:226}$
On Tuesday 15 January 1793, at the National Convention, a roll call vote took place on the first two questions:$^{:226}$$^{:80–87}$
* 1 "Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State, yes or no?"
* 2 "Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted to the ratification of the people, yes or no?"
The members from each département were called in turn, beginning with the letter G, with each announcing their votes from the podium.
Next, from 10:30 am on Wednesday 16 January until the evening of Thursday 17 January, without interruption, a roll-call vote was conducted on the third question, starting with the département of Haute-Garonne:$^{:228}$$^{:92–110}$
* 3 "What punishment should be imposed be imposed on Louis?"
It was then that Jean-Baptiste Mailhe, the first to speak, declared:
"As a natural consequence of the opinion that I have already expressed on the first question, I vote for the death of Louis. I will make only one observation. If death has the majority, I think that it would be worthwhile for the National Convention to examine whether it would not be politic and useful to hasten, or to delay, the moment of execution. This proposition is independent of my vote. I return to the first question and I vote for death."$^{:228}$
Some members of the Convention complained that there had been irregularity in the voting in the third question. Following a debate, the Convention agreed that there would be a second roll-call vote in the third question, where each member would be asked to confirm their vote. This meant that there were a total of five votes on four substantive questions.$^{:232–3}$
Mailhe's suggestion raised the question of whether, for any reason, the death sentence ought to be stayed. At the session on Saturday 19 January, despite fierce opposition from Jean-Paul Marat, on the motion of fr:René-Pierre Choudieu, the Convention decreed that it would immediately discuss the question of a reprieve, and that the question would be put as follows:
* 4 "Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?" and that the answer was to be "yes" or "no".
The roll call vote was held in alphabetical order by département, starting with Gers.$^{:118–9}$

## Votes

The result of the votes on the four questions were as follows:

### Summary by département

Députés are listed by département in the order in which they were elected.

### Ain

6 députés and 2 substitutes$^{:44}$
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| fr:Étienne Deydier | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Antoine-François Gauthier des Orcières | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Jean-Baptiste Royer | Yes | Yes | Confinement for the duration of the war and banishment after peace is declared | Yes |
| Grégoire Jagot | en mission | en mission | en mission | en mission |
| fr:Jean Luc Anthelme Mollet | Yes | Yes | Detention, then banishment when the security situation permits | Yes |
| fr:Jean-Marie François Merlino | Yes | Yes | Death | No |

### Aisne

12 députés and 4 substitutes$^{:45}$
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| fr:Nicolas-Marie Quinette | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Jean Antoine Debry | Yes | No, justified | Death | No |
| fr:Louis Étienne Beffroy | Yes | Yes | Death | No |
| Louis Antoine Léon de Saint-Just | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Jean-François Belin | Yes | Yes | Detention until peace is declared, and death if foreign powers seek to restore him | Yes |
| fr:Michel Edme Petit | Yes | Yes | Death | No |
| Nicolas de Condorcet | Yes | No | The severest criminal penalty short of death. | Abstained |
| fr:Jean-Jacques Fiquet | Yes | Yes | Confinement during the war and deportation after peace is declared | Yes |
| fr:Marie Jean François Philibert Le Carlier d'Ardon | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Pierre Loysel | Yes | Yes | Death with a reprieve until the people accept the new constitution | Yes |
| fr:André Dupin de Beaumont | Yes | No | The severest penalty short of death | No |
| fr:Augustin Bouchereau | Yes | No | Death with a reprieve to be determined by the Convention | Yes |

### Allier

7 députés and 4 substitutes$^{:46}$
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| fr:Gilbert Chevalier | Yes | Yes | Abstained | Abstained |
| fr:Pourçain Martel | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Claude-Lazare Petitjean | Yes | Abstained | Death | No |
| fr:Pierre Jacques Forestier | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Joseph Beauchamp | en mission | en mission | en mission | en mission |
| fr: Pierre François Félix Joseph Giraud | Yes | No | Death, with a reprieve until the Convention has taken measures to ensure public security | unwell, did not vote |
| fr:Étienne Vidalin | Yes | No | Death | en mission |

### Basses-Alpes

6 députés and 2 substitutes$^{:46}$
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| fr:Jacques Verdollin | Yes | Yes | Imprisonment for the duration of the war and banishment after peace is declared | Yes |
| fr:Claude Louis Réguis | Yes | Yes | Detention throughout the war and exile following peace, on pain of death | Yes |
| fr:Pierre Jacques Dherbez-Latour | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Marius Félix Maïsse | Yes | Yes | Death | Unwell, did not vote |
| Louis François Peyre | Yes | Yes | Death, with the Mailhe amendment | No |
| fr:Marc-Antoine Savornin | Yes | No | Death, with the Mailhe amendment | No |

### Hautes-Alpes

5 députés and 4 substitutes$^{:46}$
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| fr:Pierre Barrety | Yes | Yes | Detention during the war and exile after peace is declared | Yes |
| fr:Hyacinthe-Marcelin Borel du Bez | Yes | Yes | Detention during the war and exile after peace is declared | Yex |
| fr:Jean-François Izoard | Yes | Abstained, but declared that if the king was condemned to death he would vote "yes" | Detention for the time being, taking such measures as new circumstances might require. | Yes |
| Jean-Joseph Serres | Yes | Yes | Detention during the war and exile after peace is declared | Yes |
| Ignace Caseneuve | As a legislator, yes, but not as a judge | Yes | Detention during the war and exile after peace is declared | Yes |

### Ardèche

7 députés and 3 substitutes.$^{:47}$
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| François-Antoine de Boissy d'Anglas | Yes | Yes | Imprisonment in a secure place until peace is declared and the recognition of the French Republic allows the representatives of the nation to order his banishment | Yes |
| Hector de Soubeyran de Saint-Prix | Yes | Yes | Death with reprieve until peace is achieved and all the Bourbons expelled | Yes |
| François-Joseph Gamon | Yes | Yes, justified | Death with reprieve until enemy countries reappear on the territory of the Republic | Yes |
| fr:François-Jérôme Riffard Saint-Martin | Yes | Yes, justified | Confinement until the end of the war, and after the peace, perpetual banishment | Yes |
| fr:François-Clément Privat de Garilhe | Yes | Yes | Confinement until peace and the recognition of our new government, then exile outside French territory. | Yes |
| fr:Claude Gleizal | Yes | No | Death with reprieve until the Convention makes a determination about the fate of the condemned's family | Yes |
| fr: Simon Joseph Coren-Fustier | Yes, justified | Yes | Confinement until the Republican government of France is recognised, then perpetual banishment, on pain of death. | Yes |

### Ardennes

8 députés and 4 substitutes.$^{:47}$
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| Edmond Louis Alexis Dubois-Crancé | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Claude Joseph Ferry | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Jean-Baptiste Augustin Prosper Mennesson | Yes | Yes | Death with a reprieve until the removal of the Duke of Orléans and his family from the Cnventiom. | Yes |
| fr: Alexis Joseph Vermon | Yes | Yes | Detention until peace, but death in the event of foreign invasion of the territory of the Republic | Yes |
| Michel Robert | Yes | No | Death | Yes |
| Pierre-Charles-Louis Baudin | Yes | Yes justified | Confinement throughout the war and deportation after peace | Yes |
| fr: Claude Thierriet | Yes | Yes | Perpetual detention | Yes |
| fr: Jacques Blondel | Yes | Yes | Detention, on the express condition that he be punished with death if the enemies of the state set foot on the territory of the Republic. | Yes |

### Ariège

6 députés and 2 substitutes.$^{:48}$
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| Marc-Guillaume-Alexis Vadier | Yes | No | Death | No |
| Jean-Baptiste Clauzel | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Pierre Campmartin | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Jean Espert | Yes | No | Death | No |
| Joseph Lakanal | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Raymond Gaston | Yes | No | Death | No |

### Aube

9 députés and 3 substitutes.$^{:49}$
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| Edme-Bonaventure Courtois | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Louis Antoine Joseph Robin | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Pierre Nicolas Perrin | Yes | Yes | Detention until peace and banishment at that time | Yes |
| fr: Claude Duval de Fraville | Yes | No | Detention during the war and banishment after peace | Yes |
| fr:Jean Thomas Bonnemain | Yes | Yes | Detention during the war and banishment after peace | Yes |
| fr: Joseph Nicolas Pierret | Yes | Yes | Detention during the war and banishment after peace | Yes |
| fr: Jean-Claude Douge | Yes | Yes | Detention during the war and banishment after peace | Yes |
| Antoine Marie Charles Garnier | Yes | No | Death | No |
| Jean-Paul Rabaut de Saint-Étienne | Yes | Yes | Detention during the war and banishment after peace | Yes |

### Aude

8 députés and 3 substitutes.$^{:49}$
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| fr:Michel Azéma | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Pierre François Bonnet | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Dominique-Vincent Ramel-Nogaret | Yes | Yes justified | Death | No |
| fr:Jean-Laurent-Germain Tournier | Yes | Yes | Confinement throughout the war and banishment after peace | Yes |
| fr:Jean-Baptiste Marragon | Yes | Yes | Death | No |
| fr:François Antoine Morin | Yes | Yes | Detention throughout the war and banishment after peace, unless exceptional measures are necessary, including pain of death if an invasion of French territory takes place. | Yes |
| fr:Jacques Périès | Yes | Yes | Confinement of Louis and his family thoroughly the war and banishment for all of them after peace | Yes |
| fr:Antoine Marie Girard | Yes | Yes | Death | Yes |

### Aveyron

9 députés and 3 substitutes.$^{:50}$
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| fr:Jean-Baptiste Bô | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Charles Saint-Martin-Valogne | Yes | Yes | Confinement throughout the war and banishment after peace | Yes |
| fr:Louis Lobinhès | I declare: yes as a legislator, but have no wish to act as a judge | Yes | Detention throughout the war and exile after peace | Yes |
| fr:Louis Bernard de Saint-Affrique | Yes | No | Imprisonment throughout the war and banishment thereafter, when the Assembly thinks it appropriate | Yes |
| fr:Simon Camboulas | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Jean-Louis Second | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Joseph-Henri Lacombe | Yes | No | Death with the Mailhe amendment | No |
| fr:Louis Louchet | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Xavier Godefroy d'Yzarn de Freissinet de Valady | Abstained | Yes | Imprisonment of Louis, his wife and children in the château de Saumur, where they should be guarded as hostages until Francis of Austria recognises the sovereignty of the French Republic and the independence of the Belgians. | Yes |

### Bouches-du-Rhône

12 députés and 7 substitutes.$^{:51}$
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| Jean Duprat | Yes | Yes | Death | No |
| François Rebecqui | Yes | Yes | Death | No |
| Charles Jean Marie Barbaroux | Yes | Yes | Death | Yes |
| fr:François Omer Granet | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Pierre-Toussaint Durand de Maillane | Yes justified | Yes justified | Detention until peace, then banishment on pain of death | Sick |
| Thomas-Augustin de Gasparin | Yes | No | Death | No |
| Moyse Bayle | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Pierre Marie Baille | Yes | No | Death | No |
| Stanislas Joseph François Xavier Rovère | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Claude Romain Lauze de Perret | Yes | Yes | Confinement throughout the war and banishment after peace in pain of death | Yes |
| fr:Denis-Marie Pellissier | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Bernard Laurens | Yes | No | Death | No |

### Calvados

13 députés and 5 substitutes
* Claude Fauchet, 1° yes, as citizen and legislator. As a judge I have no standing, and I make no pronouncement, 2° yes justified, 3° Confinement during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Louis Dubois du Bais, 1° yes justified, 2° yes 3° death with reprieve until the foreign powers set foot on our territory, or until others join them in making war on us, 4° yes.
* fr:Jean-Baptiste Lomont, 1° abstained and justified his position, 2° yes, 3° confinement during the war and deportation after peace, 4° yes.
* Pierre Henry-Larivière, 1° abstained and justified his position, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and exile after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Pierre-Louis Bonnet de Mautry, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
* fr:Louis-Alexandre-Jacques Vardon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until foreign nations recognise the independence of the Republic and the sovereignty of the French people, and exile after peace, 4° yes.
* Doulcet de Pontécoulant, 1° yes justified, 2° no, 3° provisional detention and expulsion after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Jacques Taveau, 1° yes justified, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until our enemies attempt to invade our territory or until the adoption of the constitution, 4° yes.
* fr:Thomas Jouenne-Longchamp, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until such time as the Convention decides it should take place, 4° no.
* fr:Louis-Philippe Dumont, 1° yes justified, 2° yes, 3° confinement throughout the war and perpetual banishment once the republican government is solidly established, 4° yes.
* fr:Gabriel de Cussy, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement throughout the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Alexandre Legot, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement throughout the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Jean-François Philippe-Delleville, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement throughout the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.

### Cantal

8 députés and 3 substitutes
* Anne-Alexandre-Marie Thibault, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° confinement during the war and, after peace, expulsion of Louis, his family and all the Bourbons, 4° yes.
* Édouard Jean Baptiste Milhaud, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Jacques Méjansac, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement throughout the war and banishment after peace, 4° sick.
* Jean-Baptiste Lacoste, 1° yes, 2° not justified p, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jean-Baptiste Carrier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Joseph Mailhes, 1° absent, 2° absent, 3° absent, 4° absent.(*)
* fr:Antoine Dominique Chabanon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° Detention until peace, then perpetual banishment, 4° yes.
* fr: Guillaume Peuvergne, 1° oui, 2° oui, 3° confinement throughout the war and banishment after peace, 4° oui.
(*-In late 1792 Joseph Mailhes declared himself unable to accept the position of député owing to illness, and resigned. On 13 December 1792 the General Council of the Cantal department appointed fr:Jean-Pierre Malhes to replace him. Malhes had been elected as the first substitute member in the elections to the Convention in September 1792. Malhes arrived in Paris on 17 January 17, 1793 and was promptly admitted to the Convention as Mailhes' replacement. However, as neither Mailhes nor Malhes was able to participate in the roll call votes, it is Mailhes' name that appears in the register for those votes, followed by the words "absent due to illness" and "absent without cause").

### Charente

9 députés and 4 substitutes
* fr:Antoine Dubois de Bellegarde, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean Guimberteau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean-François Simon Chazaud, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° yes, 4° no.
* fr:Augustin Chedaneau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° yes.
* fr:Jean-Pierre Ribéreau, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean-Baptiste Devars, 1° oui, 2° oui, 3° detention followed by banishment, 4° yes.
* Jean Brun, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Jacques Crevelier 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Pierre-Jacques Maulde de Loisellerie, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° perpetual detention, unless exceptional measures are required when the constitution is presented for popular approval or after the end of the war, 4° yes.

### Charente-Inférieure

11 députés and 4 substitutes
* André Antoine Bernard, 1° yes justified, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jean-Jacques Bréard, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Joseph Eschassériaux, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Joseph Niou, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° yes, 4° no.
* fr:Pierre-Charles Ruamps, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jacques Garnier , 1° yes justified, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Gustave Dechézeaux, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention until circumstances allow this to be replaced by banishment, 4° no.
* fr:Paul Augustin Lozeau, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Marc Antoine Alexis Giraud, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr: Pierre Étienne Vinet, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Jacques Sébastien Dautriche, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until peace, after which the Convention or the legislature will take the measures it judges appropriate, 4° yes.

### Cher

6 députés and 2 substitutes
* fr:Pierre Allasœur, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° imprisonment until peace, then banishment, 4° yes.
* fr:Jacques Foucher, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° en mission.
* fr:François Baucheton, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Charles-Benoît Fauvre-Labrunerie, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Élie-François Dugenne, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* Jacques Pelletier, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° yes.

### Corrèze

7 députés and 3 substitutes
* Jacques Brival, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Borie, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Bigorie du Chambon, 1° yes justified, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° abstained
* fr:Bernard-François Lidon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
* fr:Antoine-Joseph Lanot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean-Augustin Pénières, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Pierre Raymond Lafon de Beaulieu, 1° abstained and justified his decision, 2° abstained, 3° recused himself, 4° abstained.

### Corse

6 députés and 2 substitutes
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| Christophe Saliceti | Yes as a citizen, and not as a judge | No | Death | No |
| fr:Ange Chiappe | Yes justified | Yes | Detention during the war and deportation afterwards | Sick |
| fr:Luc-Julien-Joseph Casabianca | Yes | No | Detention, apart from any measures the Convention might take depending on circumstances | Yes |
| fr:Antoine Andrei | Yes | Yes | Confinement for as long as necessary for the salvation of the country | Yes |
| fr:Jean-Baptiste Bozi | Yes | Yes | Confinement until peace, then banishment | absent |
| fr:Jean André Moltedo | Yes | No | Detention during the war | sick |

### Côte-d'Or

10 députés and 4 substitutes
* Claude Basire, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Louis-Bernard Guyton-Morveau, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* Claude-Antoine Prieur-Duvernois, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Charles-François Oudot (Charles-François), 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Florent-Guiot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Charles Lambert de Belan, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° imprisonment throughout the war and deportation after peace, so long as the people do not grant future legislatures the power to determine his fate otherwise, 4° sick.
* fr:Nicolas-Joseph Marey, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention throughout the war and expulsion one year after the tyrants have laid down their weapons and recognised the Republic, 4° yes.
* fr:Narcisse Trullard, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Juste Rameau de La Cérée, 1° yes justified, 2° no, 3° immediate and perpetual banishment without prejudice to any measures to be taken against family, 4° yes.
* fr:Théophile Berlier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

### Côtes-du-Nord

8 députés and 3 substitutes
* fr:Gabriel Hyacinthe Couppé, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° Confinement during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Julien-François Palasne de Champeaux, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war, as a hostage, and expulsion after peace, on pain of death, 4° yes.
* fr: René Claude Gaultier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° perpetual detention, 4° yes.
* fr:Pierre Guyomar, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° provisional detention during the wat and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Honoré-Marie Fleury, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Claude-Joseph Girault, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr: René-Charles Loncle des Aleux, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Guillaume Julien Pierre Goudelin, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until the end of dangers to the homeland will allow him and his family to be banished, or until a new invasion of our land obliges the Convention to take his head on the scaffold, according to the demand of the people, 4° yes.

### Creuse

7 députés and 3 substitutes
* fr:Marc-Antoine Huguet, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
* fr:Jean Debourges, 1° yes/recused himself (sources vary), 2° yes, 3° abstained, 4° abstained.
* fr:Jean-Baptiste Coutisson-Dumas, 1° yes, as a statesman and not as a judge, 2° yes, 3° confinement until the Constitution is adopted, and a law is passed specifically concerning the fate of the tyrant, 4° yes.
* fr:Jean-François Guyès, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Louis Jorrand, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war, then banishment one year after peace, 4° no.
* fr:Jean-François Barailon, 1° recused himself and justified his position, 2° sick, 3° detention, until some other measure may be required for public safety, 4° yes.
* fr:Léonard-Michel Texier-Mortegoute, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention, 4° no.

### Dordogne

10 députés and 3 substitutes
* fr:François Lamarque, 1° not included in the roll call, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Jacques Pinet, 1° not included in the roll call, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* Élie Lacoste, 1° not included in the roll call, 2° no, 3° death, 4° non.
* fr:Pierre Roux-Fazillac, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean Guillaume Taillefer, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean-Pascal Charles de Peyssard, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Étienne Cambort-Borie, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° sick.
* fr:Jean Allafort, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: François Meynard, 1° made a declaration, but did not answer the question, 2° yes, 3° detention throughout the war, until after peace determining whether exceptional measures ought to be taken for the tranquility and safety of the Republic, 4° yes.
* fr: Gabriel Bouquier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

### Doubs

6 députés and 2 substitutes
* fr:Jean-Baptiste Quirot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement during the war and banishment after peace, 4° no.
* fr: Jean-Baptiste Michaud, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Philippe Charles François Seguin, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement during the war and banishment after the re-establishment of peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Jacques Monnot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Charles-Baptiste-François Vernerey, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Alexandre Besson, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.

### Drôme

9 députés and 3 substitutes
* fr:Marc Antoine Jullien, 1° yes justified, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Pierre-Barthélemy Sauteyra, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Joseph Fiacre Olivier de Gérente, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and deportation after peace, 4° oui.
* fr: François Marbos, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention, 4° yes.
* fr:Joseph Antoine Boisset, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jacques-Bernardin Colaud de La Salcette, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until peace p, then banishment, but on pain of death if enemies invade the territory of the Republic, 4° yes.
* fr: Jean Jacques Jacomin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean Raymond Fayolle, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr: Jean-Marie Martinel de Visan, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.

### Eure

11 députés et 4 suppléants
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| François Buzot | Yes | Yes | Death with the Mailhe amendment | Yes |
| fr:Thomas Lindet | Yes | No | Death | No |
| Jean-Baptiste Robert Lindet | Yes | No | Death | No |
| Jean-Michel Duroy | Yes | No | Death | No |
| Richou | Yes | Yes | Detention during the war and banishment after peace | Yes |
| fr:Denis Le Maréchal | Yes justified | Yes | Placed in a safe location with his family until peace is concluded, then deportation | Yes |
| fr:Jean-Nicolas Topsent | sick | sick | sick | sick |
| fr:Alexis-Joseph Bouillerot-Demarsenne | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Jacques Nicolas Vallée | Yes | Abstained | Detention until the Republican government is recognised, then expulsion outside the territory of the Republic, except if enemy armies enter French territory, in which case, death. | Yes |
| fr:Louis-Jacques Savary | Yes | Yes | Placed in a safe location with his family until peace is concluded, then deportation | Yes |
| fr:Charles-François Dubusc | Made a declaration but did not answer the question fait | Yes | Detention, then expulsion when public safety requires it | Yes |

### Eure-et-Loir

9 députés and 4 substitutes
* Jean-François Delacroix, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jacques Pierre Brissot, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until after the ratification of the Constitution by the people, 4° yes.
* Jérôme Pétion de Villeneuve, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° yes.
* fr:Jacques Charles Giroust, 1° abstained and justified his decision, 2° yes, 3° confinement, 4° yes.
* Denis Toussaint Lesage, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° yes.
* fr:Jean-François Loiseau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Nicolas Bourgeois, 1° yes as a citizen and not as a legislator, 2° yes justified, 3° sick, 4° sick.
* fr:Pierre Jacques Chasles, 1° yes, 2° not justified p, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Jacques Frémanger, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

### Finistère

8 députés and 3 substitutes
* fr:Alain Bohan, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° yes.
* Claude-Antoine-Auguste Blad, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until the expulsion of his entire family, 4° no.
* fr:Mathieu Guezno, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Pierre Marec, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° confinement during the war and perpetual exile afterwards, 4° no.
* Jacques Queinnec, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Augustin Bernard-François Le Goazre de Kervelegan, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Jacques Tanguy Marie Guermeur, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean-René Gomaire, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.

### Gard

8 députés and 3 substitutes
* fr:Jacques-Augustin Leyris, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jean-Henri Voulland (Jean-Henri) 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jacques Jac, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until the acceptance of the Constitution by the people, 4° yes.
* François Aubry, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° death with a reprieve until after the primary assembles have been held to ratify the Constitution, 4° yes.
* fr:Joseph-François Balla, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement during the war and banishment after peace when public safety will allow it, 4° yes.
* Jacques Antoine Rabaut-Pommier, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° death with a reprieve until after the ratification of the constitutional decrees, 4° yes.
* Jean-Pierre Chazal, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° yes.
* fr:Antoine Berthezène, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until after the primary assemblies have been held or the Constitution has been presented for popular approval, 4° yes.

### Haute-Garonne

12 députés and 4 substitutes
* Jean-Baptiste Mailhe, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the amendment in my name, 4° yes.
* Jean-François-Bertrand Delmas, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Joseph-Étienne Projean, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Emmanuel Pérès de Lagesse, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until peace, then banishment, 4° yes.
* Jean Julien, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jean-Marie Calès, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Antoine Estadens, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until peace, then banishment, 4° yes.
* fr:Louis-Bernard Aÿral, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Claude-Louis-Michel de Sacy, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° Death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
* Jacques-Marie Rouzet, 1° made a declaration but did not answer the question, 2° yes, 3° prison sentence, 4° yes.
* fr:Philippe Drulhe, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° banishment on pain of death if Louis returns to France, 4° yes.
* fr:Julien-Bernard-Dorothée Mazade-Percin, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° Perpetual confinement, 4° yes.

### Gers

9 députés and 3 substitutes
* fr:Antoine Louis La Plaigne, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Louis Bon de Montaut, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Bernard Descamps, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Joseph Capin, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° confinement until the consolidation of liberty, then banishment, 4° yes.
* Barbeau du Barran (Joseph Nicolas), 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Joseph Laguire, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Pierre Ichon, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* Francois Bousquet, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean Moysset, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° Confinement until peace, then banishment, 4° yes.

### Gironde

12 députés and 6 substitutes
* Pierre Victurnien Vergniaud, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
* Élie Guadet, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° yes.
* fr:Armand Gensonné, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean-Antoine Grangeneuve (Jean-Antoine), 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention, 4° abstained.
* fr: Jean Jay, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jean-François Ducos, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Pierre-Anselme Garrau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jean-Baptiste Boyer-Fonfrède, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Alexandre Deleyre, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jacques Paul Fronton Duplantier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
* Jacques Lacaze, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° Confinement until peace, and until the foreign powers recognise the Republic, after which, banishment, 4° sick.
* fr:François Bergoeing, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement, 4° yes.

### Hérault

9 députés and 3 substitutes
* Pierre Joseph Cambon, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Ange-Élisabeth-Louis-Antoine Bonnier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean-François Curée, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement during the war and deportation after peace, 4° yes.
* Jacques Joseph Viennet, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° confinement until peace or until the European powers recognise the independence of the Republic; thereafter banishment on pain of death, 4° yes.
* fr:Jean-Pascal Rouyer, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jean-Jacques-Régis de Cambacérès, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° punishment established against conspirators but suspension of the decree and confinement until the cessation of hostilities, at which time the fate of Louis should be finally determined, however immediate execution of the decree in the event of invasion of French territory, 4° yes.
* fr: Ignace Brunel, 1° yes, 2° yes, detention in perpetuity, or deportation according to the circumstances, 4° yes.
* fr:Claude Dominique Côme Fabre, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Pierre Castilhon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement and banishment after peace, 4° yes.

### Ille-et-Vilaine

10 députés and 5 substitutes
* fr:Jean-Denis Lanjuinais, 1° yes, without being tried, 2° yes, 3° confinement until peace and banishment afterwards, on pain of death if he returns to France, 4° yes.
* fr:Jacques Defermon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement, 4° yes.
* fr:Charles François Marie Duval, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Joseph Marie François Sevestre, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Jean-François Chaumont, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Roch Pierre François Lebreton, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° perpetual confinement, 4° no.
* fr: François-Marie Jan du Bignon, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention until the forthcoming primary assemblies, which may confirm or commute the punishment, 4° no.
* fr:Mathurin Jean François Obelin-Kergal, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement during the war and deportation after peace, 4° yes.
* fr: Pierre Jean-Baptiste Beaugeard, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Jean-François Maurel, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention until peace and the consolidation of the Republic, followed by banishment, 4° yes.

### Indre

6 députés and 2 substitutes
* fr:Gilles Porcher de Lissonay, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until peace and stability of the government, allowing him to be banned forever from the territory of the Republic, 4° yes.
* fr:Guillaume Thabaud de Bois-La-Reine, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
* fr:Sylvain Pépin, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° detention until the end of the war; deportation after peace, 4° no.
* fr:Jacques-Antoine Boudin 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° imprisonment until the end of the war, then deportation after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Sylvain-Phalier Lejeune, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean Joseph Eustache Derazey, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement, then deportation when circumstances permit, 4° yes.

### Indre-et-Loire

8 députés and 3 substitutes
* fr:Pierre-Claude Nioche, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jacques Louis Dupont, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Charles-Albert Pottier, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean-François Martin Gardien, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until peace, then deportation, 4° yes.
* fr:Albert Ruelle, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
* fr:René-Jean Champigny-Clément, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Claude-Alexandre Ysabeau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Pierre Joseph François Bodin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement during the war; banishment on pain of death, one year after peace, 4° yes.

### Isère

9 députés and 3 substitutes
* fr:Mathieu Baudran, 1° yes justified, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Louis-Benoît Genevois-Duraisin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Joseph Sébastien Servonat, 1° yes, 2° yes, as a legislator, 3* confinement and banishment after the war, on pain of death, 4° yes.
* Jean-Pierre-André Amar, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Léonard Joseph Prunelle de Lière, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° banishment without delay of Louis with all his family, on pain of death, 4° sick.
* fr:André Réal, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war, with this punishment to be commuted in calmer times to perpetual banishment, 4° no.
* fr:Pierre Joseph Didier Boissieu, 1° yes, 2° as a judge no, as a legislator yes (the “no” vote was recorded), 3° confinement during the war and banishment after peace, 4° no.
* fr:Jean-Joseph-Victor Genissieu, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° yes
* fr: Pierre-François Charrel, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

### Jura

8 députés and 3 substitutes
* Théodore Vernier, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° detention and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr: Jacques-Henri Laurenceot, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement and banishment of Louis and all his family after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Antoine Grenot, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° yes.
* fr: Claude-Charles Prost, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Pierre-Marie-Athanase Babey, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until peace, and banishment at that time on pain of death, 4° yes.
* fr:Jean-Claude Amyon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Étienne Joseph Ferroux, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° yes.
* fr:Marc-François Bonguyod, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention in perpetuity, to be commuted to deportation if circumstances allow, 4° yes.

### Landes

6 députés and 2 substitutes
* fr:Pierre-Arnaud Dartigoeyte, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Jean-Baptiste Lefranc, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° banishment, and beforehand detention until peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Paul Cadroy, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention, 4° yes.
* Roger Ducos, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean Dyzès, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean-Baptiste Pierre Saurine, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention of Louis and all his family in a safe place until peace is solidly established, unless we then take such a course as we deem expedient, 4° yes.

### Loir-et-Cher

7 députés and 5 substitutes
* Henri Grégoire, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
* François Chabot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Marcou Brisson, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Augustin Frécine, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Claude-Nicolas Leclerc, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° perpetual detention, 4° yes.
* fr: Pierre-Étienne Venaille-Bodin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:André Foussedoire, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

### Loire

Département not created until November 1793.

### Haute-Loire

7 députés and 4 substitutes
* fr: Claude-André-Benoît Reynaud, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Balthazar Faure, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Joseph-Étienne Delcher, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Antoine Rongiès, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Joseph Bonet de Treyches, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° yes.
* Armand-Gaston Camus, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission,
* fr: Jean-André Barthélémy, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.

### Loire-Inférieure

8 députés and 3 substitutes
* fr:Jean Nicolas Méaulle, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Julien-Urbain-François-Marie-Riel Lefebvre de La Chauvière, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement and deportation after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Étienne Chaillon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement throughout the war, and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:François Mellinet, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement during the war and deportation after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:François-Toussaint Villers, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Joseph Fouché, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:François-Joseph Jary, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until peace and perpetual banishment once the republican government is solidly established, 4° yes.
* fr:Pierre Coustard, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until peace and banishment after the war, 4° yes.

### Loiret

9 députés and 4 substitutes
* fr: Michel Gentil 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until general peace, and the consolidation of liberty, then deportation after the war, 4° abstained.
* fr:Jean Philippe Garran de Coulon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement, 4° yes.
* fr: Louis-Pierre-Nicolas-Marie Lepage, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr: Bon Thomas Pellé, 1° yes, not as a judge but as a member of a legislative and political body, 2° no, 3° detention during the war and perpetual deportation thereafter, 4° yes.
* fr:Pierre Lombard-Lachaux, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° yes.
* fr: Pierre Guérin des Marchais, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement until peace, and expulsion after the war, 4° yes.
* fr: René-Louis Delagueulle de Coinces, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jean-Baptiste Louvet de Couvray, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° death with a reprieve until the people accept the new Constitution, 4° yes.
* Léonard Bourdon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.

### Lot

10 députés and 3 substitutes
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| fr:Jean-Baptiste La Boissière | Yes | Not justified | Death with the Mailhe amendment | Yes |
| fr:Étienne Cledel | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Jean Salleles | Yes | Yes | Confinement until peace and then banishment | Yes |
| Jeanbon Saint-André | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Hugues-Guillaume-Bernard-Joseph Monmayou | Yes | No | Death | No |
| Jean-Baptiste Cavaignac | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Jean-Pierre Bouygues | Yes | No | Confinement | Yes |
| fr:Jean-Baptiste Cayla | Yes | No | Sick | Sick |
| fr:Pierre Delbrel | Yes | Not justified | Death with a reprieve until the Convention has taken measures for general security concerning the Bourbon family | Yes |
| fr:Barthélemy Albouys | Yes | Yes | Confinement until peace and then banishment | Yes |

### Lot-et-Garonne

9 députés and 3 substitutes
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| fr:Antoine Vidalot | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Antoine Jean Blaise Laurent | Yes | Yes | Confinement | Yes |
| fr:Pierre Paganel | Yes | No | Death with the Mailhe amendment | Yes |
| fr:Jean-Baptiste-Joseph Claverye | Yes | Yex | Confinement until peace and then banishment | Yes |
| fr:Jean Félix Larroche | Yes | Yes | Detention during the war and banishment after peace | Yes |
| fr:Pierre Boussion | Yes | Yes | Death | No |
| fr:Pierre-Jules Guyet-Laprade | Yes | Yes | Detention during the war and banishment after peace | Yes |
| fr:Marc-Antoine Fournel | Yes | No | Death | Yes |
| fr:Thomas Noguères | Yes | Yes | Confinement until peace and banishment at a suitable time | Yes |

### Lozère

5 députés and 2 substitutes
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| fr:Jean-André Barrot | Yes | Yes | Deportation of Louis, his wife and his two children to one of our most inaccessible islands, guarded by a corps of Parisians until thus measure is judged no longer appropriate | No |
| fr:Alexandre Paul Guérin de Tournel de Joyeuse de Chateauneuf-Randon | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Laurent Servière | Yes | No | Confinement in a secure location, and death only in the event of the enemy invading French territory | Sick |
| Jean Pelet | en mission | en mission | en mission | en mission |
| fr:Pierre-Laurent Monestier | Yes | No | Death, asking that the punishment not be enacted until after peace | No |

### Maine-et-Loire

11 députés and 4 substitutes
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| fr:René-Pierre Choudieu | Yes | No | Death | No |
| Joseph Delaunay | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Louis-Charles-Auguste de Houlières | Yes | Yes | Confinement during the war and deportation after peace, as well as for his family | absent |
| Louis-Marie de La Révellière-Lépeaux | Yes | Not justified | Death | No |
| fr:Urbain-René Pilastre de la Brardière | Yes | No | Confinement until peace, then banishment | Yes |
| Jean-Baptiste Leclerc | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Marie-François Dandenac | Yes | No | Confinement until peace and then banishment | Yes |
| fr:Pierre-Marie Delaunay | Yes | No | Confinement until peace and then banishment | Yes |
| fr:Charles-François-Jean Pérard | Yes | Not justified | Death | No |
| fr:Jacques Dandenac | Yes | No | Deportation of all the prisoners in the Temple | Yes |
| fr:Julien-Camille Le Maignan | Yes | No | Confinement until peace and then banishment | Yes |

### Manche

13 députés and 5 substitutes
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| fr:Gervais Sauvé | Yes | Yes | Confinement until peace, and then deportation | Yes |
| fr:Jacques Poisson de Coudreville | Yes | Yes | Confinement until peace, and then deportation | Yes |
| fr:Jean Angélique Lemoine-Devilleneuve | Yes | No | Death | No |
| Étienne-François Letourneur | Yes | Yes | Death | No |
| fr:Bon-Jacques Ribet de Rugneville | Yes | Yes | Death with a reprieve until the expulsion of the Bourbons | Yes |
| fr:Pierre Louis Pinel | Yes | Yes | Detention until peace and then deportation | Yes |
| Jean-Baptiste Le Carpentier | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Édouard-Léonor Havin | Yes | Yes | Death | Yes |
| fr:Siméon Bonnesœur-Bourginière | Yes | Yes | Death with a reprieve until twenty four hours after the decree of accusation against Marie-Antoinette and the banishment of the Bourbons | Yes |
| fr:Jacques Engerran-Deslandes | Yes | Yes | Perpetual detention | Yes |
| fr:Charles-Louis-François Regnault de Bretel | Yes | No | Detention until the end of the war and banishment after peace | Yes |
| fr:André-François Laurence | Yes | Yes | Death with a reprieve for as long as Spain does not declare war and until Germany has given us an honourable peace. | Yes |
| fr:Jean Michel Hubert-Dumanoir | Yes | Yes | Death | Yes |

### Marne

10 députés and 4 substitutes
* Pierre-Louis Prieur, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jacques-Alexis Thuriot de la Rosière, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° yes, 4° no.
* Louis-Joseph Charlier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Charles-François Delacroix, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean-Louis Deville, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean-Baptiste Poulain de Boutancourt, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until the end of the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* Jean-Baptiste Drouet, 1° sick, 2° sick, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean-Baptiste Armonville, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: François Joseph Blanc, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement during the war, and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr: Jean-César Battellier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

### Haute-Marne

7 députés and 3 substitutes
* fr:Louis Guyardin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Simon-Edme Monnel, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Louis Félix Roux, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Anne Joseph Arnoux Valdruche, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Guillaume Chaudron-Rousseau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Pierre-Antoine Lalloy, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Antoine-Hubert Wandelaincourt, 1° recused himself and justified his decision, 2° recused himself, 3° banishment afte4 th3 war, 4° yes.

### Mayenne

8 députés et 3 suppléants
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| fr:Jacques-François Bissy | Yes | No | Death with a reprieve until foreign powers seek to invade the territory of the Republic; if they do not, the Convention should consider whether there are grounds for commuting the sentence. | Yes |
| fr:François Joachim Esnue-Lavallée | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:François Grosse-Durocher | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Mathurin Enjubault | Yes | No | Death with a reprieve until foreign powers seek to invade the territory of the Republic; if they do not, the Convention should consider whether there are grounds for commuting the sentence. | Yes |
| fr:François Serveau-Touchevalier | Yes | No | Death with a reprieve until foreign powers seek to invade the territory of the Republic; if they do not, the Convention should consider whether there are grounds for commuting the sentence. | Yes |
| fr:René-François Plaichard Choltière | Yes | No | Detention until peace and banishment along with his family after the war | Yes |
| Noël-Gabriel-Luce Villar | Yes | No | Detention during the war, and then banishment in perpetuity | Yes |
| fr:René-François Lejeune | Yes | No | Perpetual detention | Yes |

### Meurthe

8 députés and 3 substitutes
* fr:Jean-Baptiste Salle, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until peace, then banishment after the war, 4° yes.
* François René Mallarmé, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Antoine Levasseur, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Étienne Mollevaut, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention and exile once there is peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Germain Bonneval, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Luc-François Lalande, 1° I declare that I am not a judge and in consequence I say neither yes nor no, 2° yes, 3° banishment as quickly as possible, 4° yes.
* Pierre Michel, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until the end of the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Joseph Zangiacomi, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment when public security permits, 4° yes.

### Meuse

8 députés and 3 substitutes
* Jean Moreau, 1° oui, 2° oui, 3° bannissement, qui n'aura lieu qu'à la paix, 4° oui.
* fr:Jean-Joseph Marquis, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° provisional detention as a hostage, then banishment, 4° yes.
* fr:Charles Nicolas Tocquot, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° provisional confinement and banishment after the war, 4° yes.
* fr:Philippe-Laurent Pons de Verdun, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Claude Jean Roussel, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until the end of the war, and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Claude Hubert Bazoche, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° provisional detention as a hostage, then banishment, 4° yes.
* Sébastien Humbert, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement during the warn and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Jean-Baptiste Harmand, 1° yes, 2° non, 3° immediate banishment with his wife, his children and his sister, 4° no.

### Morbihan

8 députés and 3 substitutes
* fr:Joseph-François Le Malliaud de Kerharnos, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° provisional confinement and banishment after peace, on pain of death, 4° no.
* fr:Pierre Lehardy, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention as long as the Republic remains at risk, or until the people accept the Constitution, then banishment along with all the Bourbons, 4° yes.
* fr: Vincent Claude Corbel, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention as a hostage, unless exceptional measures need to be taken if the territory of the Republic is invaded, 4° no.
* fr:Joseph Lequinio, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Yves Marie Audrein, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° yes.
* Pierre-Mathurin Gillet, 1° oui, 2° non, 3° detention until the end of the war and banishment along with his family after peace, 4° no.
* fr:Guillaume Michel, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement during the war and then deportation, as soon as the safety of the Republic permits, 4° yes.
* fr:Joseph Yves Roüault de Cosquéran, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement until the end of the war and expulsion after peace 4° yes.

### Moselle

8 députés and 3 substitutes
* Antoine Merlin de Thionville, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
* fr:François Nicolas Anthoine, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean-Pierre Couturier, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
* Nicolas Hentz, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Nicolas François Blaux, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention until peace and then banishment, 4° yes.
* fr:Didier Thirion, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Joseph Becker, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° perpetual detention, 4° yes.
* fr:Jean-Étienne Bar, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

### Nièvre

7 députés and 3 substitutes
* fr:Jean Sautereau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° absent.
* fr:Joseph Charlemagne Dameron, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean-Alban Lefiot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean Guillaume Guillerault-Bacoin, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:François Paul Legendre, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jacques Léonard Goyre-Laplanche, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jean-Baptiste Jourdan, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° provisional detention, then banishment when there will be no danger in proceeding to carry out this decree, 4° yes.

### Nord

12 députés and 4 substitutes
* Philippe Antoine Merlin de Douai, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* Pierre Joseph Duhem, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Eugène Constant Joseph César Gossuin, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
* fr:Henri Louis Joseph Cochet, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Jean-Jacques Fockedey, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention of Louis and his family until the Republic is no longer in danger; then banishment, 4° yes.
* fr: Gaspard Jean Joseph Lesage-Senault, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Antoine François Carpentier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Philippe Constant Joseph Briez, 1° yes, 2° non, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Albert Sallengros, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: François-Martin Poultier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Eustache Jean-Marie D'Aoust, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Charles Louis Boyaval, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

### Oise

12 députés and 5 substitutes
* fr: Jacques-Michel Coupé, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Étienne Nicolas de Calon, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Jean-Baptiste Massieu, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Charles de Villette, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Jean-Baptiste Charles Mathieu, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jean-Baptiste Cloots, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Louis-François Portiez, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
* fr: Charles-François-Marie Godéfroy, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission,
* fr: Jacques Isoré, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Antoine Delamarre, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until six months after peace is established, then banishment without the power to return, on pain of death, 4° yes.
* François Louis Bourdon, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: François Siméon Bézard, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

### Orne

10 députés and 7 substitutes
* fr:Charles Éléonor Dufriche-Valazé, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until the fate of the family of Louis Capet is decided, 4° yes.
* fr:Charles Ambroise Bertrand de La Hosdinière, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Pierre François Nicolas Plet-Beauprey, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until the National Convention has taken measures to ensure that the family of the Bourbons, particularly Philippe-Égalité, can not damage the establishment of a united and indivisible Republic, 4° yes.
* fr:Pierre-François Duboë, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the current war and perpetual banishment after peace, on pain of death if he should return to French territory, 4° yes.
* fr:Jacques-Claude Dugué d'Assé, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° banishment, but not to be enacted until after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Charles Thomas-Laprise, 1° yes, 2° abstained, 3° dealt with a reprieve until enemies invade our territory, 4° yes.
* fr:Jean-Denis Fourmy, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until peace and deportation thereafter, on pain of death if this sentence is contravened, 4° yes.
* fr:Louis Toussaint Jullien-Dubois, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Louis-Jacques Collombel de La Roussellière, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Charles Desgrouas, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.

### Paris

24 députés and 8 substitutes
* Maximilien de Robespierre, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Georges Jacques Danton, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jean-Marie Collot d'Herbois, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° death, 4° no.
* Pierre Louis Manuel, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° imprisonment outside Paris, then deportation, 4° resigned.
* Jacques Nicolas Billaud-Varenne, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* Camille Desmoulins, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jean-Paul Marat, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Louis-Charles de Lavicomterie, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* Louis Legendre, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Nicolas Raffron de Trouillet, 1° yes justified, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Étienne-Jean Panis, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Antoine Louis François Sergent dit Sergent-Marceau, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* Pierre-François-Joseph Robert, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jean Dusaulx, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* Stanislas Fréron, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Charles Nicolas Beauvais de Préau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Fabre d'Églantine, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Charles-Nicolas Osselin, 1° yes justified, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* Augustin Robespierre, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jacques-Louis David, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Antoine Boucher Saint-Sauveur, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Joseph François Laignelot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean-Jacques Thomas, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention until peace on condition that Louis will suffer death the moment the powers invade our territory, 4° yes.
* Philippe-Égalité, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

### Pas-de-Calais

11 députés and 5 substitutes
* Lazare Nicolas Marguerite Carnot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Ernest Dominique François Joseph Duquesnoy, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Philippe-François-Joseph Le Bas, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Thomas Paine, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention until the end of the war and perpetual banishment after the war, 4° yes.
* fr:Jean-Baptiste Personne, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Armand-Joseph Guffroy, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Nicolas François Enlart, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° deportation and detention in one of our islands during the war and banishment after peace, 4° absent.
* fr:Philippe-Albert Bollet, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Antoine-Guillain Magniez, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* Pierre Daunou, 1° yes justified, 2° no, 3° deportation after peace and provisional detention during the war, 4° yes.
* fr:Charles-Zachée-Joseph Varlet, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement during the war and perpetual banishment after peace, on pain of death, 4° yes.

### Puy-de-Dôme

12 députés and 4 substitutes
* Georges Couthon, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Pierre Gibergues, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Étienne Christophe Maignet, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Charles-Gilbert Romme, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Pierre-Aimable de Soubrany, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jean Henri Bancal des Issarts, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° imprisonment as a hostage, to answer with his head if the enemy invades French territory, and after the war, perpetual banishment, 4° yes.
* fr:Jean-Baptiste Girot-Pouzol, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until peace, and then perpetual banishment of the whole family, 4° yes.
* fr:Claude-Antoine Rudel, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Joseph Artaud-Blanval, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean-Baptiste-Benoît Monestier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jacques Antoine Dulaure, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean Laloue, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.

### Basses-Pyrénées

6 députés and 3 substitutes
* Barthélémy-Jean-Baptiste Sanadon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention, until the Republic is recognised by the powers of Europe; then banishment, on pain of death, 4° yes.
* Antoine Conte, 1° I vote yes as a legislator. As a judge I have nothing to say, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war, and banishment after peace, on pain of death, 4° yes.
* fr:Joseph Pémartin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention, and perpetual banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Arnaud Jean Meillan, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention and banishment after the Republic has been consolidated, 4° yes.
* fr:Antoine Casenave, 1° oui, 2° yes, 3° confinement of Louis and his family, until after peace, then perpetual exile, 4° yes.
* fr:Étienne Neveu, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention for as long as the war lasts, unless exceptional measures are required depending on the circumstances after peace, 4° yes.

### Hautes-Pyrénées

6 députés et 2 suppléants
* Bertrand Barère de Vieuzac, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Pierre Dupont de Bigorre, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° death with a reprieve until the territory of the Republic is purged of the Bourbons, 4° yes.
* Brice Gertoux, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr: Jean-Pierre Picqué, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, with a reprieve until the end of hostilities, 4° yes.
* Jean-Bertrand Féraud 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Jean Lacrampe, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.

### Pyrénées-Orientales

5 députés and 2 substitutes
* fr:Joseph Guiter, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war, and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* Joseph Fabre, 1° sick, 2° sick, 3° sick, 4° sick.
* Jean Bonaventure Birotteau, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until peace and the expulsion of the Bourbons, 4° yes.
* fr: François-Étienne Montégut, 1° yes justified, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Joseph Cassanyes, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.

### Bas-Rhin

9 députés and 4 substitutes
* Philippe Rühl, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
* fr: Claude-Hilaire Laurent, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Pierre-Louis Bentabole, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Georges Frédéric Dentzel, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
* Jean-Antoine Louis du Bas-Rhin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Louis François Antoine Arbogast, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention until peace, then banishment, 4° abstained.
* fr:Philibert Simond, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
* fr: Jean-François Ehrmann, 1° sick, 2° sick, 3° sick, 4° sick.
* fr: Marie-Frédéric-Henri Christiani, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.

### Haut-Rhin

7 députés and 3 substitutes
* Jean-François Rewbell, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
* fr:François Joseph Ritter, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* François Sébastien Christophe Laporte, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean-Joseph Johannot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° yes.
* fr:Jean-Adam Pflieger, l'aîné, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Jean Bernard Albert, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until peace, then banishment, 4° then.
* fr: François Louis Dubois, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention until peace an£ banishment when public safety permits, 4° yes.

### Rhône-et-Loire

15 députés and 5 substitutes
Note: In November 1793 this département was divided into Loire and Rhône.
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| fr:Charles Antoine Chasset | Yes | No | Detention until peace and then banishment | No |
| fr:Jean-Baptiste Claude Henri Dupuy | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Louis Vitet | Yes | Yes | Detention, and expulsion of "the race of the Bourbons" | Yes |
| fr:Pierre Dubouchet | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Marcelin Béraud | Yes | Yes | Detention until the end of the war, banishment after peace | Yes |
| fr:Jean-Baptiste Pressavin | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Marcelin Moulin | Yes | No | Death with a reprieve until after the expulsion of all the Bourbons | Yes |
| fr:Antoine Michet | Yes | Yes | Perpetual detention | No |
| Eugène Louis Melchior Patrin | Yes | Yes | Detention until the end of the war and banishment after peace | Yes |
| fr:Jacques Forest | Yes | Yes | Detention until peace, and then banishment | Yes |
| fr:Noël Pointe | Ues | Nt justified | Death | No |
| fr:Joseph-Marie Cusset | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Claude Javogues | Yes | No | Death | No |
| François-Xavier Lanthenas | Yes | No | Death with a reprieve if our enemies leave us in peace; in this case Louis should only be exiled outside the territory of the Republic, when the Constitution has perfectly bedded in | No |
| fr:Antoine Fournier | Yes | Yes | Detention until the end of the war, banishment after peace | Yes |

### Haute-Saône

7 députés and 3 substitutes
* Charles Claude Christophe Gourdan, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Claude-Bonaventure Vigneron, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement during the war, and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* Claude François Bruno Siblot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
* fr: Claude François Xavier Chauvier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention for the time being, and banishment after peace, 4° no.
* fr: Claude-François Balivet, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° provisional dete, and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Claude-Pierre Dornier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Claude-Antoine Bolot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° yes.

### Saône-et-Loire

11 députés and 6 substitutes
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| fr:Jean-Marie Gelin | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Claude Laurent Masuyer | Yes | No | Detention until peace, and then banishment with his whole family | No |
| fr:Jean-Louis Carra | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Claude-Nicolas Guillermin | Yes | Not justified | Death | No |
| fr:Jacques Reverchon | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Ferdinand Guillemardet | Yes | No | Death | No |
| Marc Antoine Baudot | Yes | Not justified | Death | No |
| fr:Mathieu-Nicolas Bertucat | Yes | Yes | Perpetual detention | Yes |
| fr:Antoine Mailly | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Marie-François Moreau | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:François-Agnès Mont-Gilbert | Yes | No | Death with a reprieve until the time when the Republic enjoys the full benefits of its new Constitution and peace is securely established; execution of the death warrant in the event of a new invasion of our territory | Yes |

### Sarthe

10 députés and 4 substitutes
* Joseph-Étienne Richard, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: René François-Primaudière, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Gabriel-René-Louis Salmon, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement during the war, and expulsion from the territory of the Republic after peace and the establishment of the Constitution, 4° yes.
* Pierre Philippeaux, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Laurent-Martial-Stanislas Boutroue, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* René Levasseur, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Jacques-René Chevalier, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war, and banishment after peace, pendant la guerre, 4° yes.
* fr: Louis-Joseph Froger-Plisson, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyes, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Emmanuel-Pierre Le Tourneur, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

### Seine-Inférieure

16 députés and 6 substitutes
* Antoine Louis Albitte, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Pierre-Pomponne-Amédée Pocholle, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Antoine-François Hardy, 1° yes, 2° abstained, 3° detention until the end of the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr: Jean-Baptiste Yger, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment afterwards, 4° yes.
* fr: Charles-Robert Hecquet, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until the end of the war and banishment after peace, on pain of death, 4° yes.
* Jean-Pierre Duval, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until the end of the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr: Pierre-Charles-Victor Vincent, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war, and banishment for Louis and his family when the nation judges it suitable, 4° yes.
* fr:Pierre-Joseph-Denis-Guillaume Faure, 1° yes justified, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war, 4° yes.
* fr: Pierre-Louis-Stanislas Lefebvre, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention during the war, and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Charles-Auguste-Esprit-Rose Blutel, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Jacques-Charles Bailleul, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention, 4° sick.
* fr: Jacques Christophe Luc Mariette, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment thereafter, and nonetheless death in the event that foreign powers make some efforts in his favour, 4° yes.
* Pierre Philippe Doublet, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention and banishment after the consolidation of the Republic, 4° yes.
* fr: Alexandre-Jean Ruault, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention and banishment after the consolidation of the Republic, 4° yes.
* fr: Jacques François Bourgois, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment thereafter, 4° yes.
* fr: Jacques-Charles-Gabriel Delahaye, 1° yes justified, 2° yes, 3° detention for the present, and banishment after the war, 4° yes.

### Seine-et-Marne

11 députés and 11 substitutes
* fr:François-Pierre-Ange Mauduyt, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Edme Louis Barthélemy Bailly de Juilly, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° provisional detention and perpetual banishment two years after peace, 4° oui.
* fr: Armand-Constant Tellier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Michel-Martial Cordier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Jean-Nicolas Viquy, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° imprisonment until peace and then perpetual banishment, 4° yes.
* fr: Marie-Joseph Geoffroy, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and deportation after peace, 4° yes.
* fr: Claude Bernard des Sablons, 1° yes, as a holder of a mandate from the people, but I do not wish to fulfil the role of a judge, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until the Constitution has been accepted, 4° yes.
* fr: Louis-Alexandre Himbert de Flégny, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until peace and exile at the end of hostilities, 4° absent.
* fr: Christophe Opoix, 1° yes, 2° abstained, 3° detention until peace and then deportation, 4° yes.
* fr: Jean-Claude Defrance, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr: Louis-Toussaint-Cécile Bernier, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° imprisonment until the Constitution is accepted. Then the people should decide his fate, 4° yes.

### Seine-et-Oise

14 députés and 6 substitutes
* Laurent Lecointre, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Nicolas Haussmann, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
* Jean Bassal, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Charles-Jean-Marie Alquier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with a reprieve until a peace is signed, then the punishment to be executed or commuted, but execution of the sentence in the event of a foreign invasion of French territory, 4° yes.
* Antoine Joseph Gorsas, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and perpetual banishment after peace, 4° no.
* fr: Pierre-Jean Audouin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jean-Baptiste Treilhard, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with a reprieve in the greater interests of the Republic, 4° yes.
* fr: Denis Roy, 1° yes, 2° non, 3° death with a reprieve until the people have ratified the Constitution presented to them, 4° yes.
* Jean-Lambert Tallien, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Marie-Jean Hérault de Séchelles, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
* Louis Sébastien Mercier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention in perpetuity, 4° yes.
* Armand de Kersaint, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° deferral of the pronouncement of punishment until after the war; detention until then, 4° absent.
* Marie-Joseph Chénier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Charles-François Dupuis, 1° yes, as a representative of the people and not as a judge, 2° no, 3° detention, until the consolidation of the Constitution, at which point the people should pronounce on the fate of Louis, as it may judge appropriate, 4° yes.

### Deux-Sèvres

7 députés and 3 substitutes
* Michel Mathieu Lecointe-Puyraveau, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Louis-Alexandre Jard-Panvillier, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until peace, then banishment, 4° yes.
* fr:Pierre-Jean-Baptiste Auguis, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° imprisonment during the war and banishment after peace on pain of death, 4° yes.
* fr:Gaspard Severin Duchastel, 1° sick, 2° sick, 3° banishment (vote accepted despite his late arrival after voting was complete), 4° sick.
* fr:Pierre Dubreüil-Chambardel, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Louis Prosper Lofficial, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and deportation after peace, 4° yes.
* Charles Cochon de Lapparent, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

### Somme

13 députés and 4 substitutes
* fr: Jean-Baptiste Michel Saladin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Louis de Rivery, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention, 4° yes.
* fr:Jean-François Gantois, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until the end of the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* André Dumont, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Eustache-Benoît Asselin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention during the war and deportation after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Charles-Antoine Hourier-Eloy, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Pierre-Florent Louvet, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and perpetual banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr: Jean-François Dufestel, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr: Jean-Baptiste Martin-Saint-Prix, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr: Louis-Alexandre Devérité, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment when the motherland is safe, 4° yes.
* fr: Jean-Baptiste Delecloy, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until the signing of a peace, but the sentence should be carried out if the enemy appears at our frontiers, 4° yes.
* fr:Charles Alexis Brûlart de Sillery, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war, then banishment in perpetuity after the consolidation of the Republic, 4° yes.
* fr: Landry-François-Adrien François, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.

### Tarn

9 députés and 3 substitutes
* Marc David Alba Lasource, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° death, 4° no.
* Jean-Pierre Lacombe-Saint-Michel, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: François Solomiac, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:Pierre Jean Louis Campmas, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Pierre Stanislas Maruejouls, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and deportation after peace, 4° yes.
* fr: François Antoine Daubermesnil 1° sick, 2° sick, 3° sick,
* fr:Jean-Paul Gouzy, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until the Convention has determined the fate of the whole Bourbon family, 4° yes.
* fr: Henri Pascal de Rochegude, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
* fr: Jean-Baptiste Meyer, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.

### Var

8 députés and 4 substitutes
* fr: Jean-François Escudier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° absent.
* fr: Joseph Charbonnier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Jean François Ricord, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Maximin Isnard, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
* Antoine Joseph Marie d'Espinassy, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Jean Roubaud, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* Charles-Louis Antiboul, 1° yes justified, 2° no, 3° detention, as a measure for general security, 4° neither yes nor no.
* Paul Barras, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

### Vendée

9 députés and 3 substitutes
* fr: Jean-François Goupilleau, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Philippe-Charles-Aimé Goupilleau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Joseph-Marie Gaudin, 1° yes, but not as a judge, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and exile after peace, 4° yes.
* fr:François Maignen, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Joseph-Pierre-Marie Fayau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr: Joseph-Mathurin Musset, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
* fr:Charles-François-Gabriel Morisson, 1° recused himself, 2° recused himself, 3° abstained, 4° abstained.
* fr: Charles-Jacques-Étienne Girard-Villars, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement during the war and banishment after peace, on pain of death, 4° yes.
* fr:Louis-Julien Garos, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

### Vienne

8 députés and 2 substitutes
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| fr:Pierre-François Piorry | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:François Pierre Ingrand | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr: Jean-Félix Dutrou de Bornier | Yes | Yes | Confinement during the war and banishment after peace | Yes |
| fr:Louis-Charles Martineau | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr: Jean-Marie Bion | Yes | Yes | Detention during the war and banishment after peace | Yes |
| Jacques Antoine Creuzé-Latouche | Yes | Yes | Detention until peace, then perpetual banishment | Yes |
| Antoine Claire Thibaudeau | Yes | Not justified | Death | No |
| fr:Michel-Pascal Creuzé-Dufresne | Yes | Yes | Confinement during the war and banishment after peace | Yes |

### Haute-Vienne

7 députés and 3 substitutes
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| fr: Jean-Michel Lacroix | Yes | Abstained | Detention during the war and banishment after peace | Yes |
| fr:Benoît Lesterpt-Beauvais | Yes | No | Death with a reprieve until the time when enemies invade on our territory; if peace is agreed, then until a time determined by the National Convention or the legislative body. | Yes |
| fr: Pardoux Bordas | Yes | No | Perpetual confinement | No |
| fr: Léonard Honoré Gay de Vernon | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr: Gabriel Faye | Yes | Yes | Detention during the war and banishment after peace | Yes |
| fr: François Rivaud du Vignaud | Yes | Yes | Confinement during the war and banishment after peace | Yes |
| fr: Jean-Baptiste Soulignac | Yes | Yes | Detention during the war and perpetual banishment after peace, on pain of death | Yes |

### Vosges

8 députés and 4 substitutes
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| fr:Joseph Clément Poullain de Grandprey | Yes | Yes | Death with a reprieve until the Constitution has been accepted by the people, and the Bourbon family has removed itself from the soil of liberty, unless French territory is invaded by foreign troops. | Yes |
| fr:Joseph Hugo | sick | sick | sick | sick |
| fr:Jean-Baptiste Perrin des Vosges | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Jean-Baptiste Noël | Abstained | Recused himself | Recused himself | Recused himself |
| fr:Joseph Julien Souhait | Yes | Yes | Death with the Mailhe amendment | Yes |
| fr:Jean-Baptiste-Marie-François Bresson | Yes | Yes | Detention until such time as public calm will allow him to be banished | Yes |
| fr:François Couhey | Yes | Yes | Detention and exile after three years of peace, with a prohibition on returning to France, on pain of death | Yes |
| fr:Charles-André Balland | Yes | Yes | Detention, if not perpetual banishment on condition of an advantageous peace, or of pronouncing his death if the sovereign people or some particular circumstances require it. | Yes |

### Yonne

9 députés and 3 substitutes
| Députés | Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? | Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? | What punishment should be imposed on Louis? | Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet? |
| fr:Nicolas Maure | Yes | No | Death | No |
| Louis-Michel Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Louis Turreau | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Jacques Boilleau | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Jean Précy | Yes | Yes | Death with a reprieve until the ratification of the Constitution | Yes |
| Pierre Bourbotte | Yes | Not justified | Death | No |
| fr:Jean-Baptiste Hérard | Yes | Yes | Death | No |
| fr:Étienne Finot | Yes | No | Death | No |
| fr:Jean Claude Chastellain | Yes | Yes | Detention during the war and banishment after peace | Yes |

## Results
### First question

* Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State, yes or no?
* Number of députés in the Convention: 749
Absent :
| Reason | Number |
| Sickness | 7 |
| No known reason | 1 |
| En mission | 20 |
| Not appearing on any list | 3 |
| Total absent | 31 |
Present :
| Votes | Number |
| Simply answered "yes" | 683 |
| Made various declarations | 32 |
| Did not answer the question asked | 3 |
| Total votes | 708 |

### Second question

* Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people, yes or no?
* Number of députés in the Convention = 749; absolute majority of those voting (not absent, abstaining or recusing themselves) = 355
Absent :
| Reason | Number |
| Sickness | 7 |
| No known reason | 1 |
| En mission | 20 |
| Total absent | 28 |
Present :
| Votes | Number | Of which justified their opinion |
| Yes | 286 | 109 |
| No | 423 | 116 |
| Total votes | 709 |
| Abstained or recused themselves | 12 |

### Third question

* What punishment should be imposed on Louis?
* Number of députés in the Convention = 749; absolute majority of those voting (not absent, abstaining or recusing themselves) = 361
Absent :
| Reason | Number |
| Sickness | 7 |
| No known reason | 1 |
| En mission | 15 |
| Total absent | 23 |
Present :
| Votes | Number |
| Death without conditions | 361 |
| Death with the Mailhe amendment | 26 |
| Death with reprieve | 44 |
| Voted for other punishments | 290 |
| Total votes | 721 |
| Abstained or recused themselves | 5 |
Note: During the session on Friday January 18, Gasparin and Delacroix reported errors “in the statement of the decree issued yesterday”. After checking, it turned out that the number of voters and the absolute majority remained the same, but that the votes of the 26 deputies who had voted for death with the Mailhe amendment ought to have been counted as voting unconditionally for death. The number of deputies who voted for unconditional death was therefore 387.

### Fourth question

* Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet, yes or no?
* Number of députés in the Convention = 749; absolute majority of those voting (not absent, abstaining or recusing themselves) = 347
Absent :
| Reason | Number |
| Resigned | 1 |
| Sickness | 21 |
| No known reason | 8 |
| En mission | 17 |
| Total absent | 47 |
Present :
| Votes | Number |
| Yes | 310 |
| No | 380 |
| Voted for some conditions | 2 |
| Total votes | 692 |
| Abstained or recused themselves | 10 |