# Recognition of same-sex unions in Venezuela

Part of the LGBTQ rights series :
Legal status of same-sex unions :
Marriage
Andorra
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Denmark
Ecuador
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Malta
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Portugal
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Thailand
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Recognized
Israel
United States:
 • American Samoa :
Civil unions or registered partnerships but not marriage
Bolivia
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Hungary
Italy
Latvia
Monaco
Montenegro
San Marino
United Kingdom:
 • Bermuda
 • Cayman Islands :
Minimal recognition
Bulgaria
Cambodia
China
 • Hong Kong
India
Japan
Lithuania
Namibia
Nepal
Netherlands:
 • Sint Maarten
Poland
Romania
Slovakia :
See also
Same-sex union legislation
Same-sex union court cases
Timeline of same-sex marriage
Recognition of same-sex unions in Africa
Recognition of same-sex unions in Asia
Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe
Recognition of same-sex unions in the Americas
Recognition of same-sex unions in Oceania
Marriage privatization
Divorce of same-sex couples
Domestic partnership
Military policy
Adoption
Listings by country
LGBTQ rights by country or territory :
Notes
1 2 Performed in the Netherlands proper (including the Caribbean Netherlands), as well as in Aruba and Curaçao. May be registered in Sint Maarten in such cases, but the rights of marriage are not guaranteed.
↑ Neither performed nor recognized in Niue, Tokelau, or the Cook Islands.
↑ Neither performed nor recognized in six British Overseas Territories.
1 2 Neither performed nor recognized in some tribal nations of the US. Recognized but not performed in several other tribal nations and American Samoa.
↑ Registered foreign marriages confer all marriage rights in Israel. Domestic common-law marriages confer most rights of marriage. Domestic civil marriage recognized by some cities.
1 2 3 4 5 The Coman v. Romania ruling of the European Court of Justice obliges the state to provide residency rights for the foreign spouses of EU citizens. Some member states, including Romania, do not follow the ruling.
↑ A "declaration of family relationship" is available in several of Cambodia's communes which may be useful in matters such as housing, but is not legally binding.
↑ Guardianship agreements confer some limited legal benefits in China, including decisions about medical and personal care.
↑ Hong Kong provides inheritance, guardianship rights, and residency rights for foreign spouses of legal residents.
↑ Indian courts have recognised guru–shishya, nata pratha or maitri karar–type contractual relationships, but they are not legally binding.
↑ Most Japanese cities and prefectures issue partnership certificates, but they are not legally binding.
↑ Marriages conducted abroad between a Namibian national and a foreign spouse provide residency rights in Namibia.
↑ Romania provides hospital visitation rights through a "legal representative" status. :
LGBTQ portal :
vte :
Venezuela does not recognize same-sex unions. In 2008, the Supreme Tribunal of Justice ruled that the Constitution of Venezuela neither prohibits nor requires the recognition of same-sex marriage. In January 2015, a lawsuit seeking to legalise same-sex marriage in Venezuela was filed with the Supreme Tribunal, which announced in April 2016 that it would hear the case, though no decision has yet been issued. On 24 February 2022, a deputy of the opposition Cambiemos Movimiento Ciudadano party introduced a same-sex marriage bill to the National Assembly.

## Legal history
### Background

On July 14, 2006, a dual Venezuelan-English same-sex couple entered into a civil partnership at the British embassy in Caracas, in what the media described as the "first homosexual civil union" in Venezuela. The partnership was performed under British law and lacks legal recognition in Venezuela.
In February 2022, Mayor Ernesto Paraquima of the Simón Rodríguez Municipality, Anzoátegui announced that the municipality would perform same-sex marriages. Article 4 of a municipal decree issued by Paraquima "order[s] the celebration and registration of marriages without discrimination based on race, sex, creed, social status, nationality, sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression." The marriages are understood as having no legal effect, as the definition of marriage is a federal matter under Venezuelan law. Paraquima said the marriages are private contracts granting same-sex couples some legal rights and responsibilities. "If the State does not want to become involved due to registration and notarization, then we will endorse it and do it as a private document. That would also work and we would be the first," said Paraquima. The marriages have no legal standing, and are entirely symbolic. The cost to register is $400, which was criticised by activists as unaffordable for couples in light of the hyperinflation in Venezuela. The first three marriage contracts for same-sex couples were issued on 8 March 2022.

### Court cases
#### Early lawsuits

Article 77 of the Constitution of Venezuela, adopted in 1999, states that "marriage between a man and a woman is protected". It was unclear if the wording explicitly outlawed same-sex marriage. In February 2008, the Supreme Tribunal of Justice ruled in favor of Unión Afirmativa ("Affirmative Union"), a group advocating for same-sex marriage, who had requested clarification on the wording. The group had argued that the sentence was unclear and did not prevent same-sex couples from enjoying economic and social rights, including property rights in case of separation or death, alimony, adoption rights, social security benefits, protection from domestic violence, the possibility to acquire the nationality of a partner, and others. The court ruled that the National Assembly "could", but was not bound to, legislate in order to protect such rights for same-sex partners. The court ruled that Article 77 does not prohibit same-sex civil unions or marriages, but also does not require their recognition.
Article 77 of the Constitution states that:
   Marriage between a man a woman, which is based on free consent and absolute equality of rights and obligations of the spouses, is protected. A stable de facto union between a man and a woman which meets the requirements established by law shall have the same effects as marriage.
On 15 August 2016, a Venezuelan citizen and his American husband, Carlos and Patrick Holder Wendell, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts against the Venezuelan Government for its failure to recognize their legal marriage after multiple requests and petitions to the Venezuelan consulate in Boston. Their lawsuit alleged that the government's refusal to recognize their marriage violated the Venezuelan Constitution, the Civil Code and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, a treaty to which both the United States and Venezuela are parties. Judge Indira Talwani dismissed the case in May 2017, holding that U.S. courts lack standing to rule on the policies and law of foreign states.

#### Supreme Tribunal case

In January 2015, a lawsuit for the right to marry was filed with the Supreme Tribunal of Justice. On 28 April 2016, the court announced it would hear oral arguments in the case. The lawsuit challenges the constitutionality of article 44 of the Civil Code, which states that marriage is only legally valid "between a man and a woman". No ruling has currently been issued. Activists protested in front of the Supreme Tribunal building in Caracas in January 2022, criticising the seven years of inaction by the court.

#### 2018 Inter-American Court of Human Rights advisory opinion

On 9 January 2018, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) issued an advisory opinion that parties to the American Convention on Human Rights should grant same-sex couples "accession to all existing domestic legal systems of family registration, including marriage, along with all rights that derive from marriage". The advisory opinion states that:
   The State must recognize and guarantee all rights derived from a family bond between persons of the same sex in accordance with the provisions of Articles 11.2 and 17.1 of the American Convention. (...) in accordance with articles 1.1, 2, 11.2, 17, and 24 of the American Convention, it is necessary to guarantee access to all the existing figures in domestic legal systems, including the right to marry. (..) To ensure the protection of all the rights of families formed by same-sex couples, without discrimination with respect to those that are constituted by heterosexual couples.
Venezuela ratified the American Convention on Human Rights on 9 August 1977 and recognized the court's jurisdiction on 24 June 1981. Venezuela under President Hugo Chávez withdrew from the convention in 2013. In May 2019, the National Assembly controlled by the Venezuelan opposition and recognizing Juan Guaidó as president nullified the withdrawal.

### Legislative action
#### Civil unions

On 20 March 2009, Deputy Romelia Matute from the ruling United Socialist Party of Venezuela introduced an amendment to a bill on gender equality to legalize same-sex asociaciones de convivencia ("association by cohabitation"). However, later that same month, Marelys Pérez, the chair of the Family, Women and Youth Commission, denied that such language was being considered as part of the gender equality bill. She added that although the Commission would debate the same-sex partnership initiative, it would be excluded from the current bill and likely wait for inclusion in a future civil code reform or update to anti-discrimination measures. The changes to the law were postponed multiple times.
In June 2016, the Democratic Unity Roundtable announced that it would work on a civil union bill granting same-sex couples many of the rights and benefits granted to opposite-sex spouses. The draft stalled and did not receive a reading in the National Assembly.

#### Same-sex marriage

On 31 January 2014, during a debate on a civil code reform bill, the Asociación Civil Venezuela Igualitaria (ACVI; "Civil Association Equality Venezuela") submitted a measure to legalize same-sex marriage to the National Assembly. The proposal was accompanied with 21,000 signatures and supported by the state governments of Barinas, Falcón, Mérida, Monagas, Táchira, Yaracuy and Zulia. The measure sought to modify article 44 of the Civil Code to legalize same-sex marriages in Venezuela. Elvis Amoroso, the president of the Internal Policy Commission, said that any discussion on the bill was unlikely to occur in 2014. The proposal was opposed by religious groups, including the Episcopal Conference of Venezuela, which said that "God created marriage as between a man and a woman", while also stating that churches "should defend and promote the dignity of every human being". Spokespeople for the ACVI responded that Venezuela is a secular state and that the measure would not compel religious denominations to perform same-sex marriages. As with the civil union bills, the legislation stalled and was not voted on by the Assembly.
In November 2017, President Nicolás Maduro said that "I think everyone should be able to get married, even if they're homosexual", saying that the Constituent Assembly would agree to discuss the legalization of same-sex marriage. In September 2018, Hermann Escarrá, a member of the Constituent Assembly, said that there were active discussions to include provisions recognizing same-sex marriage in a new constitution being drafted, and suggested that the move had majority support in the Assembly. Discussions on a new constitution were expected to begin at the end of 2018 or early 2019, though this was postponed due to the presidential crisis.
On 24 February 2022, Vanessa Robertazzo, a deputy of the opposition Cambiemos Movimiento Ciudadano party, introduced a same-sex marriage bill to the National Assembly.

## Two-spirit marriages

The indigenous Warao people, who inhabit the Orinoco Delta region, recognize two-spirit individuals, known as tida wena, who are born male but adopt women's roles in the community, including tending to the home, cooking and caring for children and elders. The tida wena also participate in the harvest of important crops. Historically, they were sometimes the second or third wives of polygamous men. They also occasionally performed the role of a shaman. Though traditionally integrated and respected within their communities, encroaching social norms have caused the tida wena to experience discrimination today, "threatening the relative well-being that tida wena have enjoyed for centuries".

## Public opinion

According to a Pew Research Center survey conducted between November 8, 2013 and February 12, 2014, 28% of Venezuelans supported same-sex marriage, while 61% were opposed. The 2014 AmericasBarometer published in June 2015 showed that 29.6% of Venezuelans were in favour of same-sex marriage, whereas the 2017 AmericasBarometer showed that support had increased to 39%.
A 2023 poll by the Equilibrium – Center for Economic Development (Equilibrium CenDE) found that 55% of Venezuelans supported same-sex marriage (41% "totally" and 14% "somewhat"), while 32% opposed it (25% "totally" and 7% "somewhat"). 48% of respondents also supported adoption by same-sex couples (34% "totally" and 14% "somewhat"), while 39% were opposed (28% "totally" and 11% "somewhat").