# 2009 Burlington, Vermont mayoral election

Elections in Vermont :
Federal government
Presidential elections
1792
1796
1800
1804
1808
1812
1816
1820
1824
1828
1832
1836
1840
1844
1848
1852
1856
1860
1864
1868
1872
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Presidential primaries
Democratic
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Republican
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
U.S. Senate elections
1791
1794
1796
1796 sp
1797 sp
1800
1801 sp
1802
1806
1807 sp
1808
1809
1812
1814
1817 sp
1818
1818 sp
1821
1825
1827
1831
1833
1833 sp
1837
1839
1842 sp
1843
1845
1848
1850
1854 sp
1855
1856
1861
1862
1866
1866 sp
1868
1872
1874
1878
1880
1884
1886
1890
1892
1892 sp
1896
1898
1900 sp
1902
1904
1908
1908 sp
1909 sp
1910
1914
1916
1920
1922
1923 sp
1926
1928
1931 sp
1932
1934
1934 sp
1938
1940
1940 sp
1944
1946
1946 sp
1950
1952
1956
1958
1962
1964
1968
1970
1972 sp
1974
1976
1980
1982
1986
1988
1992
1994
1998
2000
2004
2006
2010
2012
2016
2018
2022
2024
2028
U.S. House elections
1791
1793
1794/95
1796/97
1797
2nd sp
1798
1800
1802/03
1804/05
1806
1808
1st sp
1810
1812
1814
1816
1818
1820/21
1822
1824
AL sp
1826/27
1828/29
1830/32
1831
2nd sp
1832
1st sp
1833
1834
5th sp
1836
1838
1840
1843
1844
1846
1848
1849
3rd sp
1850
1852
1854
1856
1858
1860
1863
1864
1866
1868
1870
1872
1874
1876
1878
1880
1882
1884
1886
1888
1890
1892
1894
1896
1898
1900
1902
1904
1906
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
1920
1922
1923
2nd sp
1924
1926
1928
1930
1932
1934
AL sp
1936
1938
1940
1942
1944
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
AL sp
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024 :
State government
General elections
2002
2004
2006
2008
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
Gubernatorial elections
1778
1779
1780
1781
1782
1783
1784
1785
1786
1787
1788
1789
1790
1791
1792
1793
1794
1795
1796
1797
1798
1799
1800
1801
1802
1803
1804
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
1813
1814
1815
1816
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1860
1861
1862
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1872
1874
1876
1878
1880
1882
1884
1886
1888
1890
1892
1894
1896
1898
1900
1902
1904
1906
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
1920
1922
1924
1926
1928
1930
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
1942
1944
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
2026
Lieutenant gubernatorial elections
2022
2024
Attorney General elections
2022
2024
Senate elections
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
House of Representatives elections
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024 :
Ballot measures
2022
Proposal 2
Proposal 5 :
Burlington
Mayoral elections
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2006
2009
2012
2015
2018
2021
2024 :
vte :
The 2009 Burlington, Vermont mayoral election was the second mayoral election since the city's 2005 change to instant-runoff voting (IRV), also known as ranked-choice voting (RCV), after the 2006 mayoral election. In the 2009 election, incumbent Burlington mayor (Bob Kiss) won reelection as a member of the Vermont Progressive Party, defeating Kurt Wright in the final round with 48% of the vote (51.5% excluding exhausted ballots).
Unlike the city's first IRV election three years prior, however, Kiss was neither the plurality winner (Republican Kurt Wright) nor the majority-preferred candidate (Democrat Andy Montroll), and Montroll was ranked more preferably than Kiss on 54% of cast ballots. Furthermore, 750 voters for Kurt Wright actually indirectly contributed to Kiss's victory despite ranking Kiss last, a phenomenon known as a failure of participation monotonicity.
This suprising outcome led to a controversy about the use of IRV in mayoral elections, culminating in a successful 2010 citizen's initiative repealing IRV's use by a vote of 52% to 48%.

## Background

Since Bernie Sanders' election as mayor in 1981, his allies and the Vermont Progressive Party had continuously held the mayoralty except for two years. The number of registered voters in Burlington rose from 24,991 in 2006, to 33,200 in 2009.
The city of Burlington, Vermont, approved IRV for use in mayoral elections with a 64% vote in 2005, at a time when IRV was used only in a few local elections in the United States. The 2006 Burlington, Vermont mayoral election was decided by two rounds of IRV tallying, selecting candidate Bob Kiss of the Vermont Progressive Party (VPP). In the election, Kiss prevailed over Democrat Hinda Miller and Republican Kevin Curley. With his election Kiss became the second member of the VPP to be elected to the office after Peter Clavelle.

## Nominations
### Progressive

Kiss officially launched his campaign on January 7, 2009.

### Democratic

On December 3, 2008, the Democrats unanimously selected to give their nomination to Montroll, who was nominated by Representative Johannah Leddy Donovan. Montroll's website was hacked two times during the campaign to feature materials about Turkey and the statements "Oooo Yeah" and "DumansaL Was Here" before being signed by "White Devil".

### Republican

Kurt Wright, president of the city council, announced his campaign on December 11, 2008.

### Other

Dan Smith, the son of Peter Plympton Smith, announced that he would run as an independent on December 2, 2008. His cousin Emily served as his campaign manager.

## Campaign

During the campaign raised $50,986 and spent $51,193, Wright raised $39,365 and spent $34,585, Montroll raised $24,202 and spent $23,021, and Kiss raised $20,265 and spent $19,946. In the last ten days of the campaign Wright raised and spent more than his opponents. Kiss received $5,000 from family members, Montroll received $4,875, Smith received $3,800, and Wright received nothing.
5 of the 7 city councilors up for reelection declined to run, including Montroll and Wright who ran for mayor instead. The Republicans lost a seat while the Democrats gained one resulting in a composition of 7 Democrats, 3 Progressives, 2 Republicans, and 2 independents.
2009 Burlington, Vermont mayoral election debates :
| No. | Date & Time | Host | Moderator | Link | Participants | Participants | Participants | Participants |
| Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Non-invitee  I Invitee | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Non-invitee  I Invitee | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Non-invitee  I Invitee | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Non-invitee  I Invitee | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Non-invitee  I Invitee | Progressive | Republican | Democratic | Independent |
| Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Non-invitee  I Invitee | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Non-invitee  I Invitee | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Non-invitee  I Invitee | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Non-invitee  I Invitee | Key: P Participant  A Absent  N Non-invitee  I Invitee | Bob Kiss | Kurt Wright | Andy Montroll | Dan Smith |
| 1 | January 8, 2009 8:00 a.m. EDT | Burlington Business Association | Brad Robertson Mike Townsend | | P | P | P | P |
| 2 | February 5, 2009 | Seven Days | Ken Picard Shay Totten | | P | P | P | P |
| 3 | February 10, 2009 5:00 p.m. EDT | Town Meeting Television | | | P | P | P | P |
| 4 | February 15, 2009 | Vermont Interfaith Action | | | P | A | P | P |
| 5 | February 22, 2009 | | | | P | P | P | P |

## Results

A recount was requested by Wright, but he withdrew his demand on March 10, after 43% of the votes were recounted.
Burlington, Vermont mayoral election, 2009 (Summary analysis) :
| Party | Party | Candidate | Maximum round | Maximum votes | Share in maximum round | Maximum votes First round votesTransfer votes |
| | Progressive | Bob Kiss | 3 | 4,313 | 48.0% | ​​ |
| | Republican | Kurt Wright | 3 | 4,061 | 45.2% | ​​ |
| | Democratic | Andy Montroll | 2 | 2,554 | 28.4% | ​​ |
| | Independent | Dan Smith | 1 | 1,306 | 14.5% | ​​ |
| | Green | James Simpson | 1 | 35 | 0.4% | ​​ |
| | Write-in | | 1 | 36 | 0.4% | ​​ |
| Exhausted votes | Exhausted votes | Exhausted votes | Exhausted votes | 606 | 6.7% | ​​ |
The elimination rounds were as follows:
| Candidates | Candidates | 1st round | 1st round | 1st round | 2nd round | 2nd round | 2nd round | 2nd round | 3rd round | 3rd round | 3rd round | 3rd round |
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | % Active | ± | Votes | % | % Active | ± | Votes | % | % Active |
| Kurt Wright | Republican | 2,951 | 32.9% | 32.9% | +343 | 3,294 | 36.7% | 37.3% | +767 | 4,061 | 45.2% | 48.5% |
| Bob Kiss | Progressive | 2,585 | 28.8% | 28.8% | +396 | 2,981 | 33.2% | 33.8% | +1332 | 4,313 | 48.0% | 51.5% |
| Andy Montroll | Democrat | 2,063 | 23.0% | 23.0% | +491 | 2,554 | 28.4% | 28.9% | N | Eliminated | Eliminated | Eliminated |
| Dan Smith | Independent | 1,306 | 14.5% | 14.5% | N | Eliminated | Eliminated | Eliminated | Eliminated | Eliminated | Eliminated | Eliminated |
| James Simpson | Green | 35 | 0.4% | 0.4% | N | Eliminated | Eliminated | Eliminated | Eliminated | Eliminated | Eliminated | Eliminated |
| Write-in | | 40 | 0.4% | 0.4% | N | Eliminated | Eliminated | Eliminated | Eliminated | Eliminated | Eliminated | Eliminated |
| Exhausted | | 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | +147 | 151 | 1.7% | | +455 | 606 | 6.7% | |
| Total | | 8980 | 100.0% | | 8980 | 8980 | 100.0% | | 8980 | 8980 | 100.0% | |

## Analysis

FairVote touted the 2009 election as one of its major success stories, with IRV helping the city avoid the cost of a traditional runoff election (which likely would not have changed who won). They also argued IRV prevented a spoiler effect that would have occurred under plurality.
Later analyses stated the race was spoiled, however, with Wright acting as a spoiler pulling moderate votes from Montroll, who would have defeated Kiss in a one-on-one race. (However, when Montroll's votes were transferred, they went largely to Kiss, not to Wright.)
FairVote also claimed the election as a success story because 99.9% of voters filled out at least one preference on their ranked-choice ballot. 16.5% of voters only selected one candidate, with 28.5% of Wright's and 29% of Kiss' voters doing so. 37.8% of the voters did not select a third candidate. 7% of ballots did not rank either of the candidates in the last round, leaving them unrepresented.
Some mathematicians and voting theorists criticized the election results as revealing several pathologies associated with instant-runoff voting, noting that Kiss was elected as a result of 750 votes cast against him (ranking Kiss in last place).
Several electoral reform advocates branded the election a failure after Kiss was elected, despite 54% of voters voting for Montroll over Kiss, violating the principle of majority rule.

### Tournament matrix

The results of every possible one-on-one election can be completed as follows:
| Andy Montroll (D) | 6262 (Montroll) – 591 (Simpson) | 4570 (Montroll) – 2997 (Smith) | 4597 (Montroll) – 3664 (Wright) | 4064 (Montroll) – 3476 (Kiss) |
| Bob Kiss (P) | 5514 (Kiss) – 844 (Simpson) | 3944 (Kiss) – 3576 (Smith) | 4313 (Kiss) – 4061 (Wright) | 3/4 Wins |
| Kurt Wright (R) | 5270 (Wright) – 1310 (Simpson) | 3971 (Wright) – 3793 (Smith) | 2/4 Wins | |
| Dan Smith (I) | 5570 (Smith) – 721 (Simpson) | 1/4 Wins | | |
| James Simpson (G) | 0/4 Wins | | | |
This leads to an overall preference ranking of:
* Montroll – defeats all candidates below, including Kiss (4,064 to 3,476)
* Kiss – defeats all candidates below, including Wright (4,313 to 4,061)
* Wright – defeats all candidates below, including Smith (3,971 to 3,793)
* Smith – defeats Simpson (5,570 to 721) and the write-in candidates
Montroll was therefore preferred over Kiss by 54% of voters, preferred over Wright by 56% of voters, over Smith by 60%, and over Simpson by 91% of voters.

### Hypothetical results under various voting systems

Because all ballots were fully released, it is possible to reconstruct the winners under other voting methods. While Wright would have won under plurality, Kiss won under IRV, and if they voted again the same way that they marked their preferential ballot, he would have won under a two-round vote or a traditional nonpartisan blanket primary.
Montroll, being the Condorcet winner, would have won if the ballots were counted using ranked pairs (or any other Condorcet method). Analyses suggested Montroll also would have won under most rated voting methods, including score voting, approval voting, majority judgment, or STAR voting.

## Effect on IRV in Burlington

There was post-election controversy regarding the IRV method, and in March 2010 a citizen's initiative resulted in the repeal of IRV in Burlington. The initially "stagnant" repeal campaign drew renewed interest as Kiss became embroiled in a series of controversies. In December 2009, a group called "One Person, One Vote", made up of Republicans and Democrats unhappy with the election outcome, held a press conference to announce that they had collected enough signatures for an initiative to repeal IRV. According to a local columnist, the vote was a referendum on Kiss's mayoralty; Kiss had allegedly become a "lame duck" because of a scandal relating to Burlington Telecom and other local issues. However, in an interview with Vermont Public Radio, Kiss disputed that claim, and those gathering signatures for the repeal stated that it was specifically a rejection of IRV itself.
Locals argued the system was convoluted, turned the 2009 election into a "gambling game" by disqualifying Montroll for having won too many votes, and "eliminated the most popular moderate candidate and elected an extremist".
David Zuckerman stated that the success of the repeal was due to Kiss' unpopularity and scandals in his administration. Rob Richie, the executive director of FairVote, said that ranked choice would have been more popular had it been used for the city council as well.
The IRV repeal initiative in March 2010 won 52% to 48%. It earned a majority of the vote in only two of the city's seven wards, but the vote in those 2009 strongholds for Kurt Wright was lopsided against IRV. Republican Governor Jim Douglas signed the repeal into law in April 2010, saying "Voting ought to be transparent and easy to understand, and affects the will of the voters in a direct way. I'm glad the city has agreed to a more traditional process."
The repeal reverted the system back to a 40% rule that requires a top-two runoff if no candidate exceeds 40% of the vote. Had the 2009 election occurred under these rules, Kiss and Wright would have advanced to the runoff. If the same voters had participated in the runoff as in the first election and not changed their preferences, Kiss would have won the runoff.
The following decade saw continuing controversy about voting methods in Burlington. In 2011, for example, an initiative effort to increase the winning threshold from the 40% plurality to a 50% majority failed by 58.5% to 41.5%, while in 2019, instant-runoff voting was once again proposed for Burlington by Councilor Jack Hanson but went unapproved by the Charter Change Committee for the March 2020 ballot.
One year later, in July 2020, the city council voted 6–5 in support of a measure to reinstate IRV, but it was vetoed by Mayor Miro Weinberger the following month. The council then amended the measure to apply only to the council itself, which the Mayor accepted, and on March 2, 2021, Burlington voters voted in favor of IRV for its city council by 64% to 36% (8,914 to 4,918). The charter change required approval by the Vermont legislature, which enacted it in May of 2022, and which the governor allowed to become law without his signature. The council in September 2022, the voters in March 2023, and the legislature in May 2023 approved the expansion of use of IRV for mayor, school commissioners, and ward election officers, with first use in March 2024.

## Endorsements
### Federal officials

* Bernie Sanders, member of the United States Senate (2007–present) and mayor of Burlington, Vermont (1981–1989)

### Local officials

* Tim Ashe, member of the Vermont Senate (2009–2021) and Burlington city council from the 3rd ward (2004–2008)

### State officials

* Hinda Miller, member of the Vermont Senate (2002–2013) and candidate for mayor in 2006 election

### Local officials

* Paul Decelles, member of the Burlington city council
* Craig Gutchell, member of the Burlington city council
* Dave Hartnett, Burlington Parks Commissioner
* John Ewing, Burlington Parks Commissioner (Democratic)

### Organizations

* Burlington Firefighters Association