# David Seymour

David Breen Seymour (born 24 June 1983) is a New Zealand politician who has been the Leader of ACT New Zealand and the Member of Parliament (MP) for Epsom since 2014. He currently serves as the first Minister for Regulation in the Sixth National Government under Christopher Luxon.
Seymour spent his early years in Whangārei and joined ACT as a student at the University of Auckland. Following his graduation in 2006, he worked in the engineering industry. Subsequently, he worked for conservative think tanks in Canada during the 2000s, before returning to New Zealand and standing unsuccessfully for election to Parliament in 2005 and 2011. He entered the House of Representatives in 2014 as ACT's sole MP, after which he replaced Jamie Whyte as party leader. Seymour's End of Life Choice bill was selected from the members' ballot on 8 June 2017 and was put to a referendum in October 2020 in conjunction with the 2020 general election. It passed with 65.91% and came into force as the End of Life Choice Act 2019 a year after the referendum.
Seymour was re-elected in 2017, and led ACT to one of its best results in the 2020 election, winning ten seats. In the 2023 general election, Seymour was re-elected and the ACT Party increased its representation to 11 seats, the best result in the party's history. ACT subsequently formed a coalition government with the National and New Zealand First parties. Under the coalition arrangement, Seymour will assume the position of deputy prime minister from 31 May 2025, replacing Winston Peters.
Seymour's views on the Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi have led to robust debate across the political spectrum. During the 2023 general election, he and the ACT party campaigned for a Treaty Principles Bill and a referendum on the principles. ACT proposed several changes to the principles, including the removal of any references to "partnership (co-governance)" (between the Crown and Māori) from the treaty's use in law and instead refer to "all New Zealanders".

## Early life

Seymour was born in Palmerston North on 24 June 1983. His family moved to Whangārei when he was a child. He is descended through his mother's father from a Māori great-great-great-grandmother, Maraea Te Inutoto, whose husband was Stephen Wrathall. Te Inutoto was from Tauwhara marae at Waimate North and a member of the Ngāti Rehia hapū of Ngāpuhi. The family's Māori ancestry was discovered through research by Seymour's great-uncles when he was seven years old. Seymour went to Auckland Grammar School and then the University of Auckland, where he graduated with a Bachelor of Engineering (Electrical & Electronic) and a Bachelor of Arts (Philosophy). He then worked in engineering.
Seymour worked as a policy analyst for the Frontier Centre for Public Policy and the Manning Centre in Canada for five years.

## Early political career
### ACT activism and candidacy

Seymour is a long-time member of ACT, initially becoming involved in the political party through ACT on Campus while studying at Auckland University. While there, he became leader of the student organisation.
Seymour contested three elections before his eventual success in 2014. He first stood for ACT in 2005 in Mt Albert and was also ranked 37th on the party list. He was unsuccessful in the electorate, which was held by Helen Clark, the prime minister at the time, and with 1.51% of the party vote ACT returned only two members to parliament, leaving Seymour out. While living in Canada, Seymour contested the 2008 election for ACT as list-only candidate, ranked 55th.
At the 2011 general election, Seymour stood for ACT in the Auckland Central electorate, but the electorate was retained by National's Nikki Kaye. Seymour was ranked fifth on the party list, but with 1.07% of the party vote, ACT was unable to return any list MPs to parliament, and John Banks, who had retained the Epsom seat for ACT, was the party's only sitting member.

### Path to leadership, 2011–2014

After the 2011 election, Seymour worked as a ministerial adviser for Banks, who was appointed an Associate Minister of Education for the John Key-led National government. Seymour assisted with the development of the government's Partnership Schools legislation.
In late 2013, John Banks resigned from his ministerial positions following criminal charges in relation to electoral returns in his bid for the Auckland mayoralty in 2010. In June 2014 he announced he would resign from ACT Party leadership and not contest Epsom in the 2014 election.
In February 2014, at the same time that Jamie Whyte was made leader of the ACT Party, Seymour won the nomination to stand as the party's candidate for Epsom. The electorate had already proven strategically important for ACT. Seymour's selection for Epsom, over former deputy leader and party president John Boscawen, was described by political commentators as the "clean slate" choice and a "fresh face". Seymour was the first confirmed candidate for the Epsom electorate, and at an Epsom public meeting during his campaign he was described as "the most popular with the crowd" and "the star of the night, intelligent, witty and articulate".
During the 2014 election campaign, Seymour released a campaign video online which the ACT Party described as going "viral" after it received around 35,000 views. Seymour said of the video: "I think it was just totally real, we didn't set out to make it funny or make it a viral video, it was just me being me, that combination with rather retro production values ... you wouldn't want to watch it standing up." Seymour was endorsed for the Epsom electorate by Prime Minister John Key, despite Key's National colleague Paul Goldsmith also contesting the electorate.

## First term, 2014–2017

At the election, Seymour was elected for the Epsom electorate with a majority of 4,250 votes. Jamie Whyte did not win in his bid for the Pakuranga electorate, and Seymour replaced Whyte as the leader of ACT on 3 October 2014.

### Ministerial portfolios

National returned as a minority government with ACT in confidence and supply in 2014, and Seymour was appointed parliamentary under-secretary to the Minister of Education and Minister of Regulatory Reform on 29 September 2014, as a result of National's confidence and supply agreement with ACT. Seymour was given responsibility for partnership schools, and reforms to the Resource Management Act 1991 and other regulation.
In October 2015, a Labour Party member's bill to make parliamentary under-secretaries subject to the Official Information Act passed its first reading in Parliament. Seymour accused the bill of personally attacking him, and said it was not necessary because under-secretaries did not have decision-making powers. Nonetheless, Seymour was one of 109 members of Parliament who voted in favour of the legislation at its third reading in June 2016.
Contracts in the second round of applications for charter (partnership) schools were completed on 11 September 2014. In January 2016, the contract was terminated for a Northland charter school from the first round, Te Pūmanawa o te Wairua. Seymour continued to support the policy and push for more charter schools to be established.

### End of Life Choice Bill

On 6 June 2015, Seymour confirmed that he was preparing a member's bill known as the End of Life Choice Bill that would legalise assisted dying. This bill was in response to the decision in Seales v Attorney-General that stated only parliament had the ability to address assisted suicide laws. On 14 October 2015, Seymour lodged the End of Life Choice Bill into the member's ballot, launched a website promoting his bill, and released an ACT-commissioned poll of 2800 people showing 66% public support in favour of legalising assisted dying. The bill passed its first reading 76–44 in December 2017 and its second reading 70–50 in June 2019. In the committee of the whole House, support from the New Zealand First party became conditional on a referendum to decide whether the law should come into force. An amendment to require a referendum passed 69–51, and the bill passed its third reading with the same numbers on 13 November. The bill received royal assent on 16 November 2019, becoming the End of Life Choice Act 2019. A referendum was held on 17 October 2020. The vote was held in conjunction with the 2020 general election, and official results were released on 6 November 2020. It was accepted by New Zealand voters, with 65.1% in support and 33.7% opposed.

### Sale and Supply of Alcohol legislation

In August 2015, Seymour introduced a member's bill to allow bars and rugby clubs to extend their bar trading hours when they are televising games from the Rugby World Cup. Most games, due to the time difference between New Zealand and England, started between 4 am and 6 am New Zealand Time, meaning that alcohol would not usually have been allowed to be sold. Despite opposition from the Green Party and the Māori Party, Seymour's bill passed all three readings, meaning that bars and rugby clubs were allowed to open for Rugby World Cup games.

### LGBTI cross-party group

In 2015, Seymour became a member of a cross-party group initiated by Jan Logie to look at and advocate for LGBTI rights. The group also included: Catherine Delahunty (Green), Chris Bishop (National), Denis O'Rourke (NZ First), Denise Roche (Green), James Shaw (Green), Kevin Hague (Green), Louisa Wall (Labour), Nanaia Mahuta (Labour), Paul Foster-Bell (National), and Trevor Mallard (Labour).

### Legalisation of Uber drivers and ride-sharing drivers

On 4 August 2017, Seymour and Transport Minister Simon Bridges helped to make Uber become part of New Zealand's transport system. This also opened other ride-sharing apps like DiDi and Ola to enter and co-exist in the market.

## Second term, 2017–2020

Seymour was re-elected to Parliament for Epsom in the 2017 general election as the sole ACT Member of Parliament.

### End of Life Choice Act

On 8 June 2017, Seymour's bill was selected from the members' ballot. The bill was debated at its first reading on 13 December 2017, and passed with 76 votes in favour and 44 against. It was then reviewed by the Justice Select Committee. It reappeared before the House for a second reading 26 June 2019 and passed, with 70 votes in favour, 50 opposed. An amendment to the bill, which included the requirement that it be approved by a binding referendum before it would take effect, passed prior to its third reading with 63 votes in favour and 57 opposed. The bill reappeared before the House and passed its third reading on 13 November 2019 with 69 votes in favour and 51 votes against.
In an interview on the day of the third reading, Seymour said that he was confident that the public would vote to put the act into law, noting that "there was overwhelming support and it should easily pass the referendum." The act was approved in the 2020 New Zealand euthanasia referendum, which was held in conjunction with the 2020 general election, with a 65.91% of voters in favour of the act.

### Gun control, 2019

Seymour was the sole Member of Parliament to oppose the Labour-led coalition government's Arms (Prohibited Firearms, Magazines, and Parts) Amendment Act 2019, which bans all semi-automatic firearms used during the Christchurch mosque shootings that occurred on 15 March 2019. Although he missed an initial procedural vote on the bill, he still cast a No vote when voting on the actual bill took place with a final result of 119 to 1. Seymour criticised the urgency of the government's gun control legislation.

### Zero Carbon Act 2019

Despite announcing that the ACT party would vote against the Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Act, Seymour was absent from the vote on the bill's third reading. This allowed it to pass into law with unanimous support, 119–0, drawing the attention of local media.

### Abortion Legislation Act 2020

Seymour supported the Abortion Legislation Act 2020 but argued that "safe zones", which would have established 150-metre protest-free areas around abortion clinics, would infringe upon freedom of expression. Prior to the third reading of the bill on 10 March 2020, Seymour successfully included an amendment eliminating safe zones around abortion clinics. The bill passed its third reading on 18 March, receiving royal assent on 23 March. Safe zones were eventually reinstated through the Contraception, Sterilisation, and Abortion (Safe Areas) Amendment Act 2022, which Seymour supported.

### Coronavirus pandemic

During the COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand, Seymour served as a member of the Epidemic Response Committee from 25 March 2020.

## Third term, 2020–2023

During the 2020 New Zealand general election, Seymour contested the Epsom electorate and was re-elected by a margin of 9,224 votes. In addition, ACT won eight percent of the popular vote, winning ten seats in Parliament (with nine on the party list). In the much expanded caucus, Seymour held the specific portfolios of Finance and COVID-19 Response spokespersons, while remaining leader of the ACT party.
Seymour's third member's bill to be debated in Parliament, the Regulatory Standards Bill, was drawn from the ballot in June 2021. It proposed stricter rules around government regulation making but failed its first reading in July 2021 without the support of the Labour government. Following that bill's introduction, but before its defeat, Seymour announced his next member's bill would establish a legislative framework for four-year terms of Parliament.

### Coronavirus pandemic

Following the Delta variant outbreak that began in August 2021, Seymour released ACT's COVID 3.0 strategy, which advocated replacing the government's elimination strategy with a "harm minimisation" strategy that focused on isolating infected individuals and easing border restrictions for travellers from low risk countries. In November 2021, Seymour advocated a regular testing regime for unvaccinated workers instead of the government's vaccine mandate for education, health and hospitality workers.
In December 2021, Seymour opposed the proposed joint Police and Māori iwi (tribal) checkpoints that screened travellers from Auckland heading into the Northland region from 15 December, arguing they would restrict people's freedom of movement. These checkpoints were located at State Highway 1 in Uretiti and State Highway 12 near Maungaturoto through the initiative of former Mana Movement leader Hone Harawira's Tai Tokerau Border Control. Seymour's criticisms were echoed by National Party leader Christopher Luxon and New Zealand First politicians Winston Peters and Shane Jones. In response, Labour's deputy leader and Te Tai Tokerau Member of Parliament Kelvin Davis alleged that criticism of the iwi-led checkpoints was motivated by anti-Māori racism.

### 2022 "arrogant prick" incident

In mid December 2022, Seymour questioned Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern during the Parliamentary Question time. As she sat down after answering, Ardern was recorded calling Seymour an "arrogant prick" on a hot mic, which meant the remark was recorded in Hansard. Ardern later issued a personal apology to Seymour because, she said, her remarks were now on record. Since New Zealand parliamentary debates are televised, the comment was also aired on television. The two politicians subsequently reconciled and joined forces to raise NZ$60,000 for the Prostate Cancer Foundation by auctioning a signed and framed copy of the Prime Minister's remark.

## Fourth term, 2023–present

In the 2023 New Zealand general election held on 14 October, Seymour was re-elected in Epsom by a margin of 8,142 votes. ACT won 8.64 percent of the popular vote and gained 11 seats in Parliament. Following the election, ACT entered into coalition talks with the National and New Zealand First parties to form a new government.
On 24 November, the three parties concluded coalition talks and reached an agreement on policy issues and ministerial portfolios. Seymour expressed confidence that ACT had secured a favourable coalition deal. He told The New Zealand Herald that the Government would announce a 100-day plan that could include repealing some legislation passed by the outgoing Labour government.
As part of the coalition negotiations, Seymour will share the position of deputy prime minister with Peters for the term of the 54th New Zealand Parliament. Peters will serve as deputy prime minister until 31 May 2025, and then Seymour will assume the office until the conclusion of the term. He is the first minister for regulation, a portfolio he proposed. He was also appointed as an associate minister of education (partnership schools), finance, and health (Pharmac).

### Associate education

In early March 2024 Seymour, in his capacity as Associate Minister of Education, confirmed that the $350 million Government-funded school lunch programme "Ka Ora, Ka Ako" would be reviewed prior to the 2024 New Zealand budget. He claimed there was no evidence that the school lunch programme had improved school achievement and attendance. Seymour cited a 2023 Treasury report which found that 12 percent of lunches (roughly 10,000 a day) were wasted. He has also suggested imposing fines on parents for truancy. The contract is due to expire at the end of 2024. The school lunch programme serves 220,000 students across New Zealand.
In response, Porirua College deputy principal John Topp and attendance officer Mose Skipworth defended the school lunches programme and said that scrapping it would lead to an increase in truancy. In response, the Health Coalition Aotearoa sought a meeting with Seymour to argue for the school lunch programme, arguing that scaling back or shutting down the programme would worsen hardship and poor educational outcomes among deprived children.
On 14 March 2024, Seymour visited Freyberg High School in Palmerston North and met with staff members including Principal Graeme Williams to discuss truancy. Towards the end of the visit, several students staged a haka (war dance) Ka Mate to protest against the Government's proposal to slash the free school lunch programme Ka Ora, Ka Ako and perceived anti-Māori policies. One student waving the National Māori flag also spat near Seymour. In response, Principal Graeme Williams condemned the students' behaviour as "totally unacceptable" and stated that those responsible would be subject to disciplinary procedures. Seymour said that one or two students failed to respect Tikanga Māori/Māori cultural values including hospitality and that the students were being affected by "torrents of information that isn't quite true." Seymour also expressed interest in meeting Freyberg High School students on his next visit. Following a 7,000-strong petition supporting the students, Williams announced that the school would not discipline the students involved in the protest but would instead work with the local iwi (tribe) Ngāti Ruanui Tumu Whakaae, the Ministry of Education, and board of trustees to implement a restorative process to address the incident.
In early April 2024, Seymour created an eight-member "Charter School/Kura Hourua Establishment Board" to facilitate the reintroduction of charter schools. The Board is headed by St Cuthbert's College principal Justine Mahon, with other notable members including Glen Denham and Professor Elizabeth Rata. The Board aims to reestablish charter schools by 2025. On 16 April, Seymour announced several changes to the early childhood education sector including easing teaching qualification requirements, allowing the government to decide the location of early childhood centres, and introducing mandatory reporting of child abuse.
On 1 May 2024, Seymour confirmed that the Government would continue to fund the previous Labour Government's free school lunches programme for a few years until the completion of a review into the programme. On 8 May, Seymour announced the Government's modified school lunch programme, which would cost $234.8 million for the 2025 school year. Under the revised scheme, 10,000 pre-schoolers in low-equity, non-profit early childhood centres would be eligible for free morning tea and lunch five days a week at a cost of $4 million. While the school lunch programme would remain unchanged for primary school students in 2025, the school lunch programme for intermediate and high school students would be bulk-purchased by the Government and delivered to schools.
On 14 May, Seymour announced that the Government would allocate $153 million from the 2024 budget to convert 35 state schools into charter schools and establish 15 new charter schools between 2025 and 2026. Labour's education spokesperson Jan Tinetti, Green education spokesperson Lawrence Xu-Nan, the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) and the Post Primary Teachers' Association (PPTA), objected to the Government's charter school plans on the grounds that they were "profit-driven", would divert funding from overwhelmed state schools, disadvantaged children with behavioural issues and disabilities and did not have to hire qualified teachers. By contrast, Innovative Education Consultants head consultant Alwyn Poole and St Stephen's School co-principal Nathan Durie welcomed the reintroduction of charter schools, arguing that they would meet the needs of children and bring flexibility to the educational system.
In late September 2024, Seymour confirmed that the Government would prosecute parents for persistent truancy and remove teacher-only days during school term time. This policy was subsequently reversed by Education Minister Erica Stanford, who confirmed four "teacher only days" in 2025 for state schools to implement the Government's new curriculum.
In mid-October 2024, Seymour released details of the Government's revised free school lunch programme, which would be launched in Term 1 2024. Seymour said that the revamped programme would save $130 million a year, with meals costing an average of NZ$3. Meals would consist of chicken katsu, butter chicken, lasagne, chicken pasta salad and wraps. Meals for students in Years 0 to 9 would be an average of 240 grams while meals for older students would be at least 300g with additional items including fruit, yoghurt or muesli bars. Schools would receive funding and resources to either prepare their meals internally, iwi/hapū providers and external suppliers including Gilmours, Foodstuffs, Watties and Hellers.
On 19 December 2024, Seymour and Tertiary Education Minister Penny Simmonds announced that the Government would amend the Education and Training Act 2020 to strengthen universities' free speech obligations.

### Associate finance

On 10 March 2024, Seymour announced that the Government would restore interest deductions on residential investment properties.

### Associate health (Pharmac)

In mid-July 2024, Associate Health Minister Seymour had instructed the pharmaceutical purchasing agency Pharmac to stop factorising the Treaty of Waitangi in its decisions, writing that "Pharmac's role should focus on delivering improved health outcomes underpinned by robust data and evidence, in accordance with its statutory responsibilities. This should serve all New Zealanders based on actual need, without assigning their background as a proxy of need." While Seymour's directive was supported Pharmac board chair Paula Bennett and Patient Voice Aotearoa chair Malcolm Mulholland, it was criticised by former Māori Health Authority clinical lead Dr Rawiri McKree Jansen, who said that the Government could do more to improve Māori access to health services and medicines.

### Acting prime minister

Seymour served as acting prime minister from 14 to 20 July 2024 during Prime Minister Luxon's personal leave following his trip to the US. Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters was unavailable for the role as he was visiting Japan and South Korea at the time. As acting prime minister, Seymour toured the Government's Military-Style Academy Pilot for youth offenders with Children's Minister Karen Chhour and the media on 20 July.

### Regulation

As Minister for Regulation, Seymour is the sponsor of the proposed Regulatory Standards Bill, saying that its purpose was to "increase transparency in lawmaking." He said that the proposed bill would prioritise individual and property rights, enabling business growth and opportunites. The Regulatory Standards Bill has been crticised by University of Auckland law Professor Jane Kelsey, who said it would circumscribe scrutiny and prioritised property rights over other considerations including the Treaty of Waitangi, the environment and workplace safety. Similarly, researcher Melanie Nelson claimed the bill lacked a "democratic mandate for constitutional changes of this magnitude." By contrast, New Zealand Initiative senior research fellow Bryce Wilkinson argued that good quality legislation was needed to protect personal autonomy and property.

## Political views and controversies

Seymour has embraced libertarian social policies since becoming party leader, such as supporting the legalisation of euthanasia, and introducing the End of Life Choice Act 2019. He has emerged as a vocal opponent of co-governance with Māori, and supports raising the retirement age and enacting tax cuts. Seymour has increasingly caused controversy for his outspoken views, which include comparing co-governance with apartheid, opposing Māori vaccination prioritisation, and a joke about sending Guy Fawkes to blow up the Ministry of Pacific Peoples.

### 2019 Hong Kong protests

Seymour has defended the rights of pro-democracy protesters in New Zealand during the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests. He criticised the Chinese Consulate-General in Auckland for praising the actions of Chinese students who had allegedly assaulted a Hong Kong student activist erecting a Lennon Wall at the University of Auckland on 29 July 2019. Seymour also spoke at a pro-Hong Kong democracy rally at the University of Auckland on 6 August 2019. Seymour's defence of free speech was praised by blogger Martyn "Bomber" Bradbury.

### Israel–Hamas war

In response to the Israel–Hamas war, Seymour as ACT Party leader issued a statement expressing solidarity with Israel and condemning Hamas' actions as terrorism. He also criticised the Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta for not explicitly condemning Hamas in her statement expressing concern at the violence. In response, Prime Minister Hipkins issued a statement condemning Hamas for targeting civilians and taking hostages in violation of international humantiarian principles. Hipkins stated that Israel had a right to self-defence but denied that Mahuta was out of step with New Zealand foreign policy, stating it was a matter of timing.

### Co-governance

Since 2021, Seymour has been a vocal opponent of co-governance initiatives, a term referring to Māori people and the Crown sharing decision-making. In Parliament, he has opposed Three Waters, He Puapua, the Māori Health Authority and the Rotorua District Council (Representation Arrangements) Bill. He said: "The net result [of co-governance] is that someone who's not accountable to the wider community gets the right to say 'no' because of their birth. It's a recipe for frustration at best and resentment and division at worst." After Seymour proposed to abolish the Ministry of Māori Development, Labour MP Willie Jackson labelled Seymour a "useless Maori" and "that [he] would 'do anything' for votes."
During the 2023 electoral campaign, both Seymour and New Zealand First leader Winston Peters campaigned against co-governance. Seymour advocates for a referendum on co-governance that would wholly redefine the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi to remove any reference to Māori. There has been strong opposition to the proposed referendum by those who view it as divisive or potentially causing civil disorder, and it is highly unpopular on the political left – especially among Māori, but also within the centre-right of the National Party (former prime minister Jim Bolger is such an opponent). Seymour has defended his views by arguing, "I think there is a real need for us to have a genuine, high-quality conversation around co-governance." His opinions were partially supported by Christopher Luxon; however, Luxon also said that the National Party did not believe a referendum was necessary.
On 19 January 2024, a draft of the ACT party's Treaty Principles Bill was leaked. The principles of the Treaty in the original Māori text were redefined as:
   Kawanatanga katoa o o ratou whenua: the New Zealand Government has the right to govern all New Zealanders
   Ki nga tangata katoa o Nu Tireni te tino rangatiratanga o o ratou whenua o rataou kainga me o ratou taonga katoa: the New Zealand government will honour all New Zealanders in the chieftainship of their land and property
   A ratou nga tikanga katoa rite tahi: all New Zealanders are equal under the law with the same rights and duties
The difference between Seymour's revision of the principles and the Māori text was his conflation of tangata ("people", in this case referring to Māori and more specifically Māori chiefs) with New Zealanders today in general, regardless of ethnicity. This was met with criticism from many Māori political figures, including Māori Party co-leaders Debbie-Ngarewa Packer and Rawiri Waititi, as well as from academics, such as Michael Belgrave, a historian and Massey University professor, "Anyone who knows anything about this topic wouldn't come up with this policy... [Act] don't have any understanding of the 50 years of Treaty principles debate". Leaked advice from the Ministry of Justice suggested that the bill was "highly contentious" due to "the fundamental constitutional nature of the subject matter and the lack of consultation with the public on the policy development prior to Select Committee".
Paul Goldsmith, the Minister of Justice, subsequently appeared on television to re-confirm prime minister Christopher Luxon's position on the proposed bill, saying that "the coalition agreement is clear that the government will support a bill on Treaty principles to first reading. However, Christopher Luxon has been clear that National has no intention to support it beyond that."
A poll conducted in February 2024 showed 36% in support of a referendum, with 35% opposed, the rest undecided.

### Criticism of hate speech laws

In mid-May 2019, Seymour generated widespread criticism, including from MPs from all of the other parties, when he stated in a radio interview that Green Party list MP Golriz Ghahraman was a "menace to freedom in [New Zealand]." Critics suggested Seymour's association of Ghahraman's support for hate speech laws with suppression of free speech by dictators like Mao Zedong and Adolf Hitler was inappropriate. Seymour argued that he had merely "attacked her views".
Seymour's concern is that the strengthening of hate speech laws is "divisive and dangerous" since the power of the state could be used by the majority to "silence unpopular views". He believes, if the law is strengthened, that what is considered hate speech will become "too subjective" and open to being abused.

### Public release of Māori vaccination code

In September 2021, Seymour caused a controversy after releasing a special COVID-19 vaccination appointment access code meant exclusively for Māori people in Auckland to his followers on Twitter. The code was intended for the population that is the least vaccinated and most at-risk for COVID-19 demographic in New Zealand. The code offered priority access for Māori who wished to be vaccinated by Whānau Waipareira (a Māori social services agency) at the Trusts Arena in West Auckland. While the move was supported by right-wing groups, it was criticised by Whānau Waipareira CEO John Tamihere and Seymour was faced with allegations of racism towards Māori despite his own Māori heritage.
Seymour defended his actions, stating that "access to vaccination has been the same for people of all ethnic backgrounds." He alleged that the code was a move by the government that suggested "Māori people have trouble making a booking". He told media that "the virus doesn't discriminate on race, so neither should the roll out."

### Ministry for Pacific Peoples remarks

On 17 August 2023, Seymour joked about bombing the Ministry for Pacific Peoples during an interview with Newstalk ZB following revelations about wasteful spending by the Ministry earlier in August. During the interview, Seymour claimed "in his fantasy' he would "send a guy like Guy Fawkes" into the Ministry's headquarters and "it'd all be over", apparently implying he would have it blown up. This was a reference to the Gunpowder Plot, planned in 1605 by English Catholic plotters but foiled at the last minute. ACT has campaigned for the abolition of the Ministry, alongside the Human Rights Commission and Ministry for Women. Seymour's remarks were criticised by Deputy Prime Minister Carmel Sepuloni and former National Party minister Alfred Ngaro as inflammatory and insensitive towards Pasifika New Zealanders. Te Pāti Māori leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer accused him of hate speech. Prime Minister Chris Hipkins condemned Seymour's comments, 'should be ashamed of himself'. Seymour refused to apologise for his remarks, claiming he was joking.
Someone subsequently filed a Police report against Seymour for his remarks, but no offence was identified.

### Links to the Atlas Network

In a 2023 interview with Mihingarangi Forbes, Seymour was questioned about his links to the Atlas Network, an American think tank and policy institute known for its climate change denial. Seymour firmly denounced Forbes' line of questioning and described his supposed connection to the group as a "crazy conspiracy theory".
However, Seymour does in fact have links to the Atlas Network; during his work for the Canadian conservative think tanks Frontier Centre for Public Policy and the Manning Centre, he was a graduate of the Atlas Networks' 2008 "MBA for Think Tanks" program. Seymour also featured in their Autumn 2008 year-in-review magazine. A clip of Seymour during his time working for the Frontier Centre for Public Policy, in which he spoke with a deliberately acquired Canadian accent, subsequently went viral. In his 2021 Waitangi Day speech, available on the ACT Party website, Seymour also referred to "my old friends at the Atlas Network".
Seymour accepts the scientific consensus on climate change, and has denied the ACT Party is contributing to climate change denial after a 2008 ACT party policy under Rodney Hide stated there is "no warming trend since 1970". Seymour said he disagreed with that statement saying "I believe New Zealand is warming".

### School lunches

Seymour shrank the budget for free school lunches, a programme introduced by the previous Sixth Labour Government that he has long opposed. On 8 May 2024, Seymour had launched a modified NZ$234.8 million school lunch programme for the 2025 school year. While the school lunch programme would remained unchanged for primary school students, the school lunch programme for intermediate and high school students would be bulk-purchased by the Government and delivered to schools. During the press announcement, Seymour stated that the bulk-purchased food would consist of sandwiches and fruit rather than quinoa, couscous, and hummus. When asked about food items such as sushi, Seymour said "If you don't get that sushi's woke, then I don't know how to wake you up, but the key message here is that we are introducing the kinds of foods that are put in the lunchboxes of children, the other 75 percent of kids, who rely on their parents to send their lunch." Labour's education spokesperson Jan Tinetti welcomed the retention of the school lunch programme but expressed concerns about changes to the secondary school lunch programme. Health Coalition Aotearoa co-chair Professor Boyd Swinburn questioned the nutritional value of bulk-purchased foods while Dish Magazine editor Sarah Tuck defended the nutritional value of quinoa and sushi.
At the start of the 2025 school year between late January and early February 2025, several schools reported problems with the revised school lunch programme including late or missed deliveries, uncooked food, insufficient nutrition, food wastage, ham in halal meals and a shortage of vegetarian meals. Consequently, several schools were forced to use their own funds to buy meals for pupils. In response to rollout issues and criticism, Seymour apologised for "teething issues" in the rollout of school lunches, which he attributed to operational issues behind delivering large amounts of meals. Seymour accepted the school lunch scheme needed improvements but defended cost-cutting measures as necessary to saving taxpayer money. By contrast, Labour's education spokesperson Tinetti criticised the National-led government for allegedly prioritising tax cuts over proper nutrition for children.
On 27 February 2025, Seymour rejected calls to sack school lunch provider School Lunch Collective and argued that the current school lunch programme was better than Labour's iteration. On 1 March, Prime Minister Luxon said that the school lunch programme was experiencing "teething issues" and said that Seymour "will work his way through those issues... and I expect he will [find a solution]." On 4 March, the Ministry for Primary Industries launched an investigation into School Lunch Collective meals after children were served meals with melted plastic packaging.
On 11 March, the Libelle Group went into liquidation. The company had been contracted by the Compass Group to provide 125,000 meals to the Government's school meal programme. By 12 March, Radio New Zealand reported that the School Lunch Collective had turned to Australian providers to address the shortfall caused by Libelle's liquidation.

### Philip Polkinghorne letter

On 9 February 2025, Seymour acknowledged that he had written a letter to Auckland District Commander Karyn Malthus in April 2022 complaining about former eye surgeon Philip Polkinghorne's treatment by Police during the course of their investigation into the death of his wife Pauline Hanna. Seymour said that he had written to Police in his capacity as Polkinghorne's electorate member of Parliament. Seymour had written the letter prior to Police charging Polkinghorne with murder in August 2022. On 10 February 2025, Prime Minister Luxon criticised Seymour's letter as "ill-advised" since Polkinghorne was the subject of an active Police investigation at the time. In response, Seymour countered that he was advocating for a constituent and believed that Police had gone "beyond the brief" of their investigation at the time. Later that night, Seymour met with Luxon to resolve their differences regarding the Polkinghorne letter. Seymour's actions were also criticised by Labour Party leader Chris Hipkins, who called for his resignation as a cabinet minister, and Chief Victims' Advisor Ruth Money, who said that Seymour should have raised Polkinghorne's concerns with the Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA).

### 2025 Land Rover fundraiser

On 10 February 2025, Seymour attracted media attention after driving a 1948 Land Rover up the steps of the New Zealand House of Representatives in order to raise funds for the University of Auckland's Centre for Heart Research's heart valve development programme. The Land Rover had been purchased from Dunedin by the Centre's director Professor Julian Paton, who was relocating it to Auckland. A security officer stopped Seymour from completing the full climb and informed him that he did not have permission from the Speaker of the House. During the incident, Seymour said "you shouldn't have to get permission do to every little thing in New Zealand" and said that Members of Parliament should not need to seek permission since Parliament was their workplace. On 11 February, Speaker Gerry Brownlee rebuked Seymour for suggesting that MPs could do as they please at Parliament. Seymour subsequently apologised for his actions in a letter.

## Personal life

Seymour appeared on the seventh series of Dancing with the Stars. He competed to raise funds for Kidsline, a youth telephone counselling service. His professional dancing partner was Amelia McGregor. Despite harsh criticism from the judges, he finished 5th.
In an interview in 2021, Seymour said he would love to start a family and would "give up politics in a heartbeat". In November 2024, he announced he had been dating Alexandra Martelli, an Auckland property buyer for the last two years, adding that he was "effectively married to Parliament" which gets in the way of starting a family.

## Electoral history
### 2005 election

2005 general election: Mount Albert :
| Notes: | Notes: | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. |
| Party | Party | Candidate | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | Party votes | % | ±% |
| | Labour | Y Helen Clark | Y Helen Clark | 20,918 | 66.55 | -1.94 | 17,501 | 54.33 | +2.53 |
| | National | Ravi Musuku | Ravi Musuku | 6,169 | 19.63 | | 8,488 | 26.35 | +13.33 |
| | Green | Jon Carapiet | Jon Carapiet | 1,485 | 4.72 | -0.67 | 2,985 | 9.27 | -1.35 |
| | NZ First | Julian Batchelor | Julian Batchelor | 746 | 2.37 | | 1,089 | 3.38 | -3.01 |
| | ACT | David Seymour | David Seymour | 746 | 2.37 | | 651 | 2.02 | -5.09 |
| | United Future New Zealand | Tony Gordon | Tony Gordon | 529 | 1.68 | | 649 | 2.01 | -3.28 |
| | Progressive | Jenny Wilson | Jenny Wilson | 407 | 1.29 | | 525 | 1.59 | -0.10 |
| | Destiny | Anne Williamson | Anne Williamson | 337 | 1.07 | | 157 | 0.49 | |
| | Independent | Jim Bagnall | Jim Bagnall | 83 | 0.26 | | | | |
| | Anti-Capitalist | Daphna Whitmore | Daphna Whitmore | 79 | 0.25 | -0.15 | | | |
| | Independent | Anthony Ravlich | Anthony Ravlich | 47 | 0.15 | | | | |
| | Direct Democracy | Howard Ponga | Howard Ponga | 30 | 0.10 | | 10 | 0.03 | |
| | Independent | Erik Taylor | Erik Taylor | 29 | 0.09 | | | | |
| | Māori Party | | | | | | 168 | 0.52 | |
| | Legalise Cannabis | | | | | | 43 | 0.13 | -0.40 |
| | Christian Heritage | | | | | | 40 | 0.12 | -0.89 |
| | Alliance | | | | | | 22 | 0.07 | -1.69 |
| | Family Rights | | | | | | 20 | 0.06 | |
| | Libertarianz | | | | | | 19 | 0.06 | |
| | RONZ | | | | | | 8 | 0.02 | |
| | 99 MP | | | | | | 6 | 0.02 | |
| | Democrats | | | | | | 3 | 0.01 | |
| | One NZ | | | | | | 0 | 0.00 | -0.01 |
| Informal votes | Informal votes | Informal votes | Informal votes | 316 | | | 130 | | |
| Total valid votes | Total valid votes | Total valid votes | Total valid votes | 31,747 | | | 32,342 | | |
| | Labour hold | Labour hold | Majority | 14,749 | | | | | |

### 2011 election

2011 general election: Auckland Central :
| Notes: | Notes: | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. |
| Party | Party | Candidate | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | Party votes | % | ±% |
| | National | Y Nikki Kaye | Y Nikki Kaye | 15,038 | 45.39 | +2.48 | 14,447 | 42.24 | +2.15 |
| | Labour | Jacinda Ardern | Jacinda Ardern | 14,321 | 43.23 | +4.69 | 8,590 | 25.11 | –9.44 |
| | Green | Denise Roche | Denise Roche | 2,903 | 8.76 | –4.66 | 7,797 | 22.79 | +7.33 |
| | NZ First | Allen Davies | Allen Davies | 412 | 1.24 | +1.24 | 1,403 | 4.10 | +1.81 |
| | Conservative | Stephen Greenfield | Stephen Greenfield | 238 | 0.72 | +0.72 | 280 | 0.82 | +0.82 |
| | ACT | David Seymour | David Seymour | 149 | 0.45 | –1.25 | 404 | 1.18 | –2.95 |
| | Human Rights | Anthony van den Heuval | Anthony van den Heuval | 68 | 0.21 | +0.01 | | | |
| | Māori Party | | | | | | 562 | 1.64 | +0.71 |
| | Mana | | | | | | 237 | 0.69 | +0.69 |
| | Democrats | | | | | | 202 | 0.59 | +0.56 |
| | Legalise Cannabis | | | | | | 146 | 0.43 | +0.14 |
| | United Future | | | | | | 75 | 0.22 | –0.46 |
| | Libertarianz | | | | | | 53 | 0.15 | +0.08 |
| | Alliance | | | | | | 10 | 0.03 | –0.002 |
| Informal votes | Informal votes | Informal votes | Informal votes | 352 | | | 164 | | |
| Total valid votes | Total valid votes | Total valid votes | Total valid votes | 33,129 | | | 34,206 | | |
| | National hold | National hold | Majority | 717 | 2.16 | –2.21 | | | |

### 2014 election

2014 general election: Epsom :
| Notes: | Notes: | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. |
| Party | Party | Candidate | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | Party votes | % | ±% |
| | ACT | David Seymour | David Seymour | 15,966 | 43.08 | −1.02 | 1,023 | 2.72 | +0.17 |
| | National | Paul Goldsmith | Paul Goldsmith | 11,716 | 31.61 | −6.19 | 23,904 | 63.45 | −1.07 |
| | Labour | Michael Wood | Michael Wood | 3,470 | 9.36 | −1.09 | 5,045 | 13.39 | −2.16 |
| | Green | Julie Anne Genter | Julie Anne Genter | 3,021 | 8.15 | +2.14 | 4,706 | 12.49 | +0.46 |
| | Conservative | Christine Rankin | Christine Rankin | 1,725 | 4.65 | +3.70 | 932 | 2.47 | +1.35 |
| | NZ First | Cliff Lyon | Cliff Lyon | 621 | 1.68 | +1.68 | 1,308 | 3.47 | +0.86 |
| | Mana | Patrick O'Dea | Patrick O'Dea | 106 | 0.29 | +0.11 | | | |
| | Independent | Grace Haden | Grace Haden | 59 | 0.16 | +0.16 | | | |
| | Independent | Matthew Goode | Matthew Goode | 37 | 0.10 | −0.06 | | | |
| | Independent | Susanna Kruger | Susanna Kruger | 31 | 0.08 | +0.08 | | | |
| | Independent | Adam Holland | Adam Holland | 21 | 0.06 | +0.06 | | | |
| | Internet Mana | | | | | | 312 | 0.83 | +0.67 |
| | Māori Party | | | | | | 174 | 0.46 | −0.13 |
| | Legalise Cannabis | | | | | | 76 | 0.20 | −0.12 |
| | United Future New Zealand | | | | | | 61 | 0.16 | −0.16 |
| | Civilian | | | | | | 17 | 0.05 | +0.05 |
| | Democrats | | | | | | 10 | 0.03 | +0.01 |
| | Ban 1080 | | | | | | 7 | 0.02 | +0.02 |
| | Focus | | | | | | 4 | 0.01 | +0.01 |
| | Independent Coalition | | | | | | 3 | 0.01 | +0.01 |
| Informal votes | Informal votes | Informal votes | Informal votes | 286 | | | 93 | | |
| Total valid votes | Total valid votes | Total valid votes | Total valid votes | 37,059 | | | 37,675 | | |
| Turnout | Turnout | Turnout | Turnout | 37,768 | 78.09 | +2.36 | | | |
| | ACT hold | ACT hold | Majority | 4,250 | 11.28 | +4.98 | | | |

### 2017 election

2017 general election: Epsom :
| Notes: | Notes: | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. |
| Party | Party | Candidate | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | Party votes | % | ±% |
| | ACT | Y David Seymour | Y David Seymour | 16,505 | 43.17 | +0.09 | 696 | 1.78 | −0.94 |
| | National | Paul Goldsmith | Paul Goldsmith | 10,986 | 28.73 | −2.87 | 22,875 | 58.64 | −4.41 |
| | Labour | David Parker | David Parker | 7,067 | 18.49 | +9.13 | 9,575 | 24.55 | +11.16 |
| | Green | Barry Coates | Barry Coates | 2,785 | 7.28 | −0.87 | 3,263 | 8.37 | −4.13 |
| | NZ First | Julian Paul | Julian Paul | 657 | 1.72 | +0.22 | 1,229 | 3.15 | −0.32 |
| | Conservative | Leighton Baker | Leighton Baker | 230 | 0.60 | −4.05 | 80 | 0.20 | −2.27 |
| | Opportunities | | | | | | 1,043 | 2.67 | — |
| | Māori Party | | | | | | 124 | 0.32 | −0.14 |
| | Legalise Cannabis | | | | | | 38 | 0.10 | −0.10 |
| | People's Party | | | | | | 34 | 0.09 | — |
| | United Future New Zealand | | | | | | 24 | 0.06 | −0.10 |
| | Ban 1080 | | | | | | 9 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
| | Democrats | | | | | | 7 | 0.02 | −0.01 |
| | Outdoors | | | | | | 7 | 0.02 | — |
| | Internet | | | | | | 6 | 0.02 | −0.81 |
| | Mana Party | | | | | | 6 | 0.02 | −0.81 |
| Informal votes | Informal votes | Informal votes | Informal votes | 317 | | | 76 | | |
| Total valid votes | Total valid votes | Total valid votes | Total valid votes | 38,230 | | | 39,008 | | |
| Turnout | Turnout | Turnout | Turnout | 39,092 | | | | | |
| | ACT hold | ACT hold | Majority | 5,519 | 14.44 | +3.16 | | | |

### 2020 election

2020 general election: Epsom :
| Notes: | Notes: | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. |
| Party | Party | Candidate | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | Party votes | % | ±% |
| | ACT | Y David Seymour | Y David Seymour | 19,500 | 46.97 | +3.80 | 4,355 | 10.36 | +8.58 |
| | Labour | Camilla Belich | Camilla Belich | 10,276 | 24.75 | +6.26 | 15,078 | 35.87 | +11.32 |
| | National | Paul Goldsmith | Paul Goldsmith | 6,397 | 15.41 | −13.32 | 15,668 | 37.27 | −21.37 |
| | Green | Kyle MacDonald | Kyle MacDonald | 3,101 | 7.47 | +0.19 | 4,596 | 10.93 | +2.56 |
| | Opportunities | Adriana Christie | Adriana Christie | 889 | 2.14 | — | 822 | 1.95 | +1.75 |
| | TEA | Noel Jiang | Noel Jiang | 337 | 0.81 | — | 112 | 0.26 | — |
| | New Conservative | Norman Sutton | Norman Sutton | 231 | 0.79 | +0.19 | 211 | 0.50 | +0.30 |
| | Advance NZ | Faith-Joy Aaron | Faith-Joy Aaron | 166 | 0.39 | — | 147 | 0.34 | — |
| | Sustainable NZ | Shannon Withers | Shannon Withers | 72 | 0.17 | — | 30 | 0.07 | — |
| | Outdoors | Maia Prochazka | Maia Prochazka | 31 | 0.07 | — | 7 | 0.01 | −0.19 |
| | Not A Party | Finn Harris | Finn Harris | 24 | 0.05 | — | | | |
| | NZ First | | | | | | 609 | 1.44 | −1.71 |
| | Māori Party | | | | | | 108 | 0.25 | −0.07 |
| | Legalise Cannabis | | | | | | 38 | 0.08 | −0.02 |
| | ONE | | | | | | 27 | 0.06 | — |
| | Social Credit | | | | | | 8 | 0.01 | — |
| | Vision NZ | | | | | | 8 | 0.01 | — |
| | Heartland | | | | | | 6 | 0.01 | — |
| Informal votes | Informal votes | Informal votes | Informal votes | 484 | | | 203 | | |
| Total valid votes | Total valid votes | Total valid votes | Total valid votes | 41,508 | | | 42,031 | | |
| Turnout | Turnout | Turnout | Turnout | 42,311 | 82.84 | | | | |
| | ACT hold | ACT hold | Majority | 9,224 | 22.22 | +7.78 | | | |

### 2023 election

2023 general election: Epsom :
| Notes: | Notes: | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. | Blue background denotes the winner of the electorate vote. Pink background denotes a candidate elected from their party list. Yellow background denotes an electorate win by a list member, or other incumbent. A Y or N denotes status of any incumbent, win or lose respectively. |
| Party | Party | Candidate | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | Party votes | % | ±% |
| | ACT | Y David Seymour | Y David Seymour | 17,826 | 44.43 | -2.54 | 5,041 | 12.40 | +2.04 |
| | National | Paul Goldsmith | Paul Goldsmith | 9,684 | 24.14 | +8.73 | 20,948 | 51.54 | +14.27 |
| | Labour | Camilla Belich | Camilla Belich | 6,189 | 15.42 | -9.33 | 5,945 | 14.62 | -21.25 |
| | Green | Lawrence Xu-Nan | Lawrence Xu-Nan | 3,537 | 8.81 | +1.34 | 5,507 | 13.55 | +2.62 |
| | Opportunities | Nina Asu | Nina Asu | 1,803 | 4.49 | +2.35 | 1,307 | 3.21 | +1.26 |
| | NZ First | Tanya Unkovich | Tanya Unkovich | 573 | 1.42 | — | 1,059 | 2.60 | +1.16 |
| | NZ Loyal | Anna Rotheray | Anna Rotheray | 164 | 0.40 | — | 123 | 0.30 | — |
| | Te Pāti Māori | | | | | | 299 | 0.73 | +0.48 |
| | NewZeal | | | | | | 76 | 0.18 | −+0.12 |
| | Legalise Cannabis | | | | | | 66 | 0.16 | — |
| | Freedoms NZ | | | | | | 34 | 0.08 | — |
| | New Conservatives | | | | | | 28 | 0.06 | -0.44 |
| | Women's Rights | | | | | | 26 | 0.06 | — |
| | DemocracyNZ | | | | | | 16 | 0.03 | — |
| | New Nation | | | | | | 5 | 0.01 | — |
| | Leighton Baker Party | | | | | | 2 | 0.00 | — |
| Informal votes | Informal votes | Informal votes | Informal votes | 339 | | | 109 | | |
| Total valid votes | Total valid votes | Total valid votes | Total valid votes | 40,115 | | | 40,637 | | |
| | ACT hold | ACT hold | Majority | 8,142 | 20.29 | -1.93 | | | |