OpenLLM-France/wikimedia huggingface dataset:
# Rianápolis

Rianápolis is a municipality in northeastern Goiás state, Brazil.

## Location

It is located almost directly north of the state capital of Brazil, and is on the important BR-153 highway, which links Belém to São Paulo. The regional center of Ceres is located 19 km. to the northwest. Highway connections from Goiânia are made by taking BR-153 from Anápolis to Rianápolis. From Goiânia take GO-080 / Nerópolis / São Francisco de Goiás / BR-153 / Jaraguá. Rianápolis is 43 km. north of Jaraguá. See Seplan
* Neighboring municipalities: Rialma, Santa Rita do Novo Destino, Jaraguá, and Uruana

## Demographics

* Urban population: 3,657
* Population density: 26.15 inhabitants/km$^2$ (2007)
* Population growth: -0.61% 1996/2007

## The Economy

Economic activity is based on agriculture, cattle raising, services, small transformation industries, and government employment. There were 135 farms in 2006 with a total of 4,724 hectares. Pasture land made up 90 percent of the total. The cattle herd had 15,000 head in 2006 while the main agricultural crops were rice, sugarcane, beans, manioc, corn, and soybeans.

## Health and Education

There were 4 schools in 2006. The adult literacy rate was 83.7% (2000) (the national average was 86.4%). There was 1 hospital with 43 beds. The infant mortality rate was 17.5 (2000) (the national average was 33.0).
Municicipal Human Development Index: 0.759 For the complete list see frigoletto.com.br

## History

The settlement began in the early 1940s along the road linking Jaraguá to the Colônia Nacional Agrícola de Goiás, present-day Ceres near an airstrip. The first houses served as a resting place for travelers between the two towns. Soon there was a store and a small hotel. The settlement was first called "Campo de Aviação", after the landing strip. In 1958 it became a municipality taking the name of Rianápols, because of its location between the towns of Rialma and Anápolis
# Michael Onslow, 7th Earl of Onslow

Michael William Coplestone Dillon Onslow, 7th Earl of Onslow (28 February 1938 – 14 May 2011), styled Viscount Cranley from 1945 to 1971, was a British Conservative politician.

## Background and education

Onslow was the only son of William Onslow, 6th Earl of Onslow, and his first wife, Pamela Dillon, daughter of Eric Dillon, 19th Viscount Dillon. He was educated at Eton and the Sorbonne.

## Political career

Onslow succeeded his father in the earldom in 1971. He was far more colourful and unorthodox, publicly opposing apartheid and police racism, among other issues. He sat on the Conservative benches. He was a supporter of reform of the House of Lords, but not as proposed by Labour. When Tony Blair's Labour government proposed the House of Lords Bill in 1999 to strip voting rights from the mostly Conservative hereditary peers in the House of Lords, Onslow said that he was happy to force a division on every clause of the Scotland Bill; each division takes 20 minutes and there were more than 270 clauses. This was a move to ruin the government's legislative programme in protest at the removal. Onslow added he would "behave like a football hooligan" on this legislative programme, which he opposed. Ironically, he was one of the more than 90 hereditary peers elected to remain in the House of Lords after the House of Lords Act 1999. He criticised the decision by the Blair government to abolish the Lord Chancellor, stating Blair was: "playing Pooh sticks with 800 years of history." He supported a majority-elected upper house. He opposed the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011.
He was a member of the Joint Committee on Human Rights from July 2005 until his death, in which capacity he strongly criticised Jacqui Smith over the government's proposed extension to the detention of terror suspects to 42 days. He disapproved of modernising tendencies within the Church of England, stating on one occasion that "...one hundred years ago, the Church was in favour of fox hunting and against buggery. Now it is in favour of buggery and against fox hunting." On two occasions he appeared on Have I Got News for You in November 1999 and October 2003 respectively. He is the only hereditary peer to have ever appeared on that programme to date.

## Death

Onslow died on 14 May 2011, aged 73, from cancer which consigned him to a wheelchair.

## Family

In 1964, Onslow married Robin Lindsay Bullard, daughter of Robert Lee Bullard III, of Atlanta, Georgia, and Ann Lindsay Bullard (née Aymer), who in 1949 married Charles McLaren, 3rd Baron Aberconway.
Onslow and his wife had three children:
* Rupert Charles William Bullard Onslow, 8th Earl of Onslow (b. 16 June 1967)
* Lady Arabella Ann Teresa Onslow (b. 1970, m. 24 June 2016), a general practitioner.
* Lady Charlotte Emma Dorothy Onslow (b. 1977)
In 2011 his daughter's wedding was accelerated so that the dying Onslow would be able to attend.
# Adams v. Robertson

Adams v. Robertson, 520 U.S. 83 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court, in a per curiam opinion, "dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted."

## Background

The defendant, Charlie Frank Robertson, filed a class action lawsuit in 1992, alleging that "Liberty National Life Insurance Company had fraudulently encouraged its customers to exchange existing health insurance policies for new policies" that provided an insubstantial amount of coverage for cancer treatment. At trial, a settlement was agreed upon that precluded class members from individually suing Liberty National. However several of the people included in the class action lawsuit disagreed with the settlement. Guy E. Adams, the plaintiff in this case, was one of those people.

## Question before the court

Does the Supreme Court of Alabama's approval of the settlement violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

## Decision of the Supreme Court

In a unanimous decision in favor of Robertson, the opinion of the court was written per curiam. The court dismissed the writ of certiorari and noted that the State Supreme Court "did not expressly address the question on which certiorari was granted." Further, the court found that the petitioners had "failed to establish that they had properly presented the issues to that court." The court concluded that it could not answer the question before the court because it would "unbalance" the US dual system of government.
# American Insurance Ass'n v. Garamendi

American Insurance Association v. Garamendi, 539 U.S. 396 (2003), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States invalidated a California law that required any insurance company wishing to do business in the state to publish information regarding insurance policies held by persons in Europe from 1920 through 1945.

## Background

The Holocaust Victim Insurance Relief Act (HVIRA) was enacted in 1999 by the California State Legislature in "an attempt to facilitate Holocaust-era insurance claims by California residents." The law required that insurance companies in California that sold policies to people in Europe between 1920 and 1945 to go public with the records of their work during that time, "including the names of policy owners and the status of the policies." American Insurance, along with several other insurance companies and trade associations filed suit claiming that the Act exceeded the powers of the State of California since it is the federal government that has the power to regulate commerce and foreign affairs. The District Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, however the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision.

## Question before the Supreme Court

Does the HVIRA "interfere with the federal government's sovereignty over foreign affairs established by Article 1 of the Constitution?"

## Decision of the Court

In a 5–4 decision in favor of American Insurance Association, Justice Souter wrote the majority opinion for the Supreme Court. The Court held that California's HVIRA "interfere with the president's ability to conduct the nation's foreign policy and is therefore preempted."
# Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes

Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes, 523 U.S. 666 (1998), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that state-owned public television networks are not required to invite minor-party candidates with few supporters to major-party debates because the networks are not public forums.
# Brendale v. Confederated Yakima Indian Nation

Brendale v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of Yakima Indian Nation, 492 U.S. 408 (1989), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Yakima Indian Nation did not hold exclusive zoning authority over all fee lands in their reservation.

## Background

The Yakama Nation is an Indian tribe with its reservation in southern Washington. The tribe comprises 14 distinct Indian tribes that the U.S. banded together in the 1850s for the purpose of treaty making. The current treaty was ratified by the Senate in 1859, under this treaty the tribe reserved to itself 1,387,505 acres (561,503 ha; 2,167.977 sq mi) for its reservation, as well as the right to exercise certain reserved rights on ceded lands and usual and accustomed locations. The reservation has tribal land and land held in fee. The fee land is owned by both tribal members and non-Indians, and tribal members are outnumbered greatly by non-Indians.

## Supreme Court

After a series of legal challenges in lower courts, the case was brought before the United States Supreme Court on appeal. The Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's decision regarding the Brendale property but reversed the decision regarding the Wilkinson property. The Court held that under the Indian General Allotment Act, 24 Stat. 388, the Yakima Nation no longer retained the exclusive use and benefit of the land and had no regulatory power over lands held in fee by non-tribal Indians where its interest in regulating the fee land was not demonstrably serious and its political integrity, the economic security, or health and welfare of the Yakima Nation was not imperiled.
# City of Chicago v. Fulton

City of Chicago v. Fulton, 592 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the mere retention of estate property after the filing of a bankruptcy petition does not violate 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(3), which operates as a "stay" of "any act" to "exercise control" over the property of the estate.
# Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc.

Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc., 528 U.S. 167 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case that addressed the law regarding standing to sue and mootness.
The Court held that the plaintiff residents in the area of South Carolina's North Tyger River had standing to sue an industrial polluter, against whom various deterrent civil penalties were being pursued. Standing was properly based on the fact that the residents alleged that they would have used the river for recreational purposes, but could not because of the pollution.
The defendant polluter also claimed that the case was moot because it had ceased polluting, and had closed the factory responsible for the pollution complained of. The Court noted that the polluter still retained its license to operate such a factory, and could reopen similar operations elsewhere if not deterred by the fine sought. Therefore, the case was held not to be moot.
The Supreme Court's majority in Friends ruled that plaintiffs did not need to prove an actual (particular) harm to residents. Writing for the majority, Ruth Bader Ginsburg held that injury to the plaintiff came from lessening the "aesthetic and recreational values of the area" for residents and users of the river because of their knowledge of Laidlaw's repeated violations of its clean water permit.
In addition, the case held that a civil penalty could be enforced against an entity even though the interests protected were private. The court agreed with Congress in holding that civil penalties in the Clean Water Act cases "do more than promote immediate compliance by limiting the defendant's economic incentive to delay its attainment of permit limits; they also deter future violations."
The 7–2 decision was written by Justice Ginsburg, and joined by Justices Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, and Breyer. Stevens and Kennedy each filed a concurring opinion. Justice Scalia wrote a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justice Thomas.
# HUD v. Rucker

HUD v. Rucker, 535 U.S. 125 (2002), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held Congress's authorization of evictions of tenants from public housing where a tenant's invitee into the housing engaged in drug-related activity and the tenant did not know about it was constitutional.
# Harris v. Alabama

Harris v. Alabama, 513 U.S. 504 (1995), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that allowing the judge to impose a death sentence and making the jury recommendation non-binding even when it calls for life imprisonment is constitutional.
# Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, 513 U.S. 374 (1995), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Amtrak is a government agency and is thus subject to the First Amendment. The Court issued its decision in a 8–1 vote, with seven justices joining the majority opinion authored by Antonin Scalia. The lone dissent came from Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.

## Background

Michael A. Lebron rented a large billboard in Amtrak's Penn Station. The advertisement was highly critical of the Coors Brewing Company for their support of the Contras in Nicaragua. The railroad turned down the ad because it was political, although the particular point of view was not an issue.
The District Court ruled that Amtrak, because of its close ties to the Federal Government, was a Government actor for First Amendment purposes, and that its rejection of the display was unconstitutional. The Court of Appeals reversed, noting that Amtrak was, by the terms of the legislation that created it, not a Government entity, and concluding that the Government was not so involved with Amtrak that the latter's decisions could be considered federal action.

## Decision

Even though Amtrak is not incorporated as a government agency, it largely functions as one. Similar to the ruling in Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority, the court found that the public and private entities functioned together to the point where Amtrak was covered by the First Amendment.
Later, in Department of Transportation v. Association of American Railroads, the court held that Amtrak is a governmental entity for purposes of determining the validity of the metrics and standards.
# Samuel Dexter (minister)

Samuel Dexter (October 23, 1700 – January 29, 1755) was a minister from Dedham, Massachusetts. He ministered there from May 1724 to 1755.

## Personal life

Dexter was born in Malden, Massachusetts on October 23, 1700. He graduated from Harvard College in 1720 and taught for a few years. On October 23, 1724, he married Catherine Mears of Roxbury. Together they had seven sons and four daughters. One daughter, Catherine, married the man who followed him in the Dedham pulpit, Jason Haven. He had fragile health, an extreme modesty, and "a disposition... to despondency." This made his life, he said, "very weary." He died January 29, 1755 and is buried in the Old Village Cemetery.
His son, who shared the name Samuel Dexter, served in the Great and General Court and on the Massachusetts Governor's Council. His grandson, also named Samuel Dexter, served in the administrations of John Adams and Thomas Jefferson.

## Ministry

Before moving to Dedham, he turned down calls from churches in Yarmouth, Medford, Westborough, Hopkinton, and Brimfield. Dexter received a deathbed blessing from Increase Mather and was considered a young minister of great potential though "severely introspective and self-critical."
He preached in Dedham for the first time on October 15, 1722 and was called to minister at the First Church and Parish in Dedham several times, beginning in the fall of 1723. His call was opposed by some in the community, but it was for primarily political reasons, not necessarily theological ones. He finally accepted on December 15, 1723. Dexter was ordained on May 6, 1724, and served until his death on January 29, 1755. He lived in the home of his predecessor, Joseph Belcher; his successor and son-in-law, Jason Haven, would later live in it. It was across the street from the meetinghouse, the site of the present day Allin Congregational Church.
During his ministry, several outlying areas of Dedham began to establish their own churches. It was then that the church, which previously had been known as the Church of Christ, began to be called First Church in Dedham. After the churches split his ministry was "calm and quiet," but before he did there were members of the community, whom he called "certain sons of ignorance and pride," who insulted him to his face. Meetings were frequently called to correct the behavior of disorderly members and this led to an ecclesiastical council in July 1725.
# RK Mladost

RK Mladost - Bogdanci (HC Mladost-Bogdanci) (Macedonian: РК Младост - Богданци) is a team handball club from Bogdanci, North Macedonia. They compete in the Macedonian First Handball League.

## Accomplishments

* EHF Cup Winners' Cup 1/4 Final: 1
** 1996-97
* EHF Cup 1/8 Final: 1
** 1999-00
* EHF Challenge Cup 1/8 Final: 1
** 2004-05

## Former players

* Filip Mirkulovski
* Mite (BELA) Karaivanov
# Ivan Diviš

Ivan Diviš (18 September 1924, in Prague – 7 April 1999, in Prague) was a significant Czech poet and essayist of the second half of the 20th century.

## Biography

He was born in Prague into the family of a bank officer. While at high school in Prague during World War II he was arrested by the Gestapo and imprisoned in Pečkárna and Pankrác. From 1942, he worked in a bookstore, and at the end of the war he was employed at publisher V. Petr. After passing his maturita he studied philosophy and aesthetics at Charles University (1945–1949). In the early 1950s, he worked as a corrector at the Communist Rudé právo newspaper. After 1953, he worked a lathe in Liberec and Prague-Kbely. In the 1960s, he was an editor at Mladá fronta publishing house. In 1964, he converted to Roman Catholicism. In the aftermath of the Prague Spring, he emigrated to West Germany in 1969 and worked as a librarian for Radio Free Europe. He lived in Munich until the Velvet Revolution of 1989 when he returned to Prague.

## Works

* Balada z regálu (1946, with Kamil Bednář, illustrated by Václav Bláha)
* První hudba bratřím (1947)
* Uzlové písmo (1960)
* Rozpleť si vlasy (1961)
* Deník molekuly (1962)
* Eliášův oheň (1962)
* Morality (1963)
* Chrlení krve (1964)
* Umbriana (1965)
* V jazyku Dolor (1966)
* Povíme si to! (1967)
* Sursum (1967, 2nd edition 1987 in Munich)
* Thanathea (1968)
* Noé vypouští krkavce (1975 in Toronto, revised 1995)
* Přece jen (1977 in Munich)
* Křížatky (1978 in Munich)
* Průvan (1978 Pondicherry)
* Beránek na sněhu (1980, 1994 in Munich)
* Odchod z Čech (1981, 1990 in Munich)
* Žalmy (186, 1991 revised in London)
* Obrať koně (1987, 1992 in Tessing)
* Moje oči musely vidět (1991)
# Octávio Felinto Neto

Octávio Felinto Neto is a Brazilian former footballer who played as a midfielder.

## Early life

Octávio was born to Sandra Regina Arantes, the illegitimate daughter of Brazilian football legend Pelé. The former Brazilian international forward only recognised her as his daughter after a lengthy court case, spanning five years from 1991 to 1996, something Octávio did not find out until he was thirteen years old. He met his grandfather face-to-face on two occasions; during the first encounter, Pelé gave him his blessing, but the second and final meeting came as Pelé lay in a hospital bed on 28 December 2022, a day before his death.
In October 2013, Octávio and his brother, Gabriel Arantes do Nascimento, took their grandfather to court, seeking further compensation for his failure to recognise their mother as his daughter, stating that they were unable to afford school fees. The court sided in favour of the brothers, with Pelé being told to pay alimony.

## Footballing career

Octávio started his footballing career at the age of five, at the Escolinha do Literol, before playing futsal for his grandfather's former team, Santos. Following the death of his mother in 2006, his father moved Octávio and his brother to Curitiba, and he joined the academy of Athletico Paranaense. Before joining Athletico Paranaense, he had trialed at Santos' youth football team, but these trials were ultimately unsuccessful, with a former coach stating in 2012 that Octávio "did not reach the technical level necessary to join the squad". He and his brother had also received offers from Corinthians, a rival of Santos, but their father, Ozéas, decided against the move - citing the pressure of being related to Pelé, who scored more goals in his career against Corinthians than any other club, as being too much.
He began to take football more seriously following the move to Curitiba, and was again invited to trial with Santos while playing for Paraná in 2010. He received national attention for a goal he scored while playing for Paraná in 2011. This viral goal led to a contract offer from São Paulo, and the brothers joined in 2011. After a year with São Paulo, the two brothers stopped training with the club, despite being under contract, and their contracts were terminated in February 2013. He also went on to play for Osasco and Independente de Limeira.
In November 2014, Guarani de Divinópolis announced that Octávio would join them ahead of the 2015 Campeonato Mineiro campaign. His father accompanied him to sign his first professional contract in February 2015, as he was still a minor. He appeared once on the bench for Guarani, but did not feature in a 3–1 Campeonato Mineiro home loss to Cruzeiro. He spent time on trial with Cruzeiro later in the year, but ultimately did not play professionally during his career, having suffered two consecutive injuries before the age of nineteen.

## Later life

Having stepped away from football, he led youth groups at an evangelical church in Osasco, and entered law school in early 2017. As of January 2023, he works as a managing partner of Arantes Do Nascimento Sports.
# Icones Plantarum

Icones Plantarum is an extensive series of published volumes of botanical illustration, initiated by Sir William Jackson Hooker. The Latin name of the work means "Illustrations of Plants". The illustrations are drawn from herbarium specimens of Hooker's herbarium, and subsequently the herbarium of Kew Gardens. Hooker was the author of the first ten volumes, produced 1837–1854. His son, Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker, was responsible for Volumes XI-XIX (most of Series III). Daniel Oliver was the editor of Volumes XX-XXIV. His successor was William Turner Thiselton-Dyer. The series now comprises forty volumes.