# Omaha-class cruiser

The Omaha-class cruisers were a class of light cruisers built for the United States Navy. They were the oldest class of cruiser still in active service with the Navy at the outbreak of World War II, being an immediate post-World War I design.

## History

Maneuvers conducted in January 1915 made it clear that the US Atlantic Fleet lacked the fast cruisers necessary to provide information on the enemy's position, deny the enemy information of the fleet's own position, and screen friendly forces. Built to scout for a fleet of battleships, the Omaha class featured high speed (35 kn (65 km/h; 40 mph)) for cooperation with destroyers, and 6-inch (152 mm) guns to fend off any destroyers the enemy might send against them. Displacing 7,050 long tons (7,160 t), they were just over 555 ft (169 m) long.
The Omaha class was designed specifically in response to the British Centaur subclass of the C-class cruiser. Although from a modern viewpoint, a conflict between the US and Great Britain seems implausible, US Navy planners during this time, and up to the mid-1930s, considered Britain to be a formidable rival for power in the Atlantic, and the possibility of armed conflict between the two countries plausible enough to merit appropriate planning measures.
The Omaha class mounted four smokestacks, a look remarkably similar to the Clemson-class destroyers (a camouflage scheme was devised to enhance the resemblance). Their armament showed the slow change from casemate-mounted weapons to turret-mounted guns. They carried twelve 6 in (150 mm)/53 caliber guns, of which four were mounted in two twin turrets, one fore and one aft, and the remaining eight in casemates; four on each side, at the corners of the superstructure. This gave them a broadside of eight guns. Launched in 1920, Omaha (designated C-4 and later CL-4) had a displacement of 7,050 long tons. The cruisers emerged with a distinctly old-fashioned appearance owing to their World War I-type stacked twin casemate-mount cannons and were among the last broadside cruisers designed anywhere.
Additional torpedo tubes and hydrophone installation was ordered. As a result of the design changes placed on the ship mid-construction, the vessel that entered the water in 1920, was a badly overloaded design that, even at the beginning, had been rather tight. The ships were insufficiently insulated, too hot in the tropics and too cold in the north. Sacrifices in weight savings in the name of increased speed led to severe compromise in the habitability of the ship. While described as a good ship in a seaway, the low freeboard led to frequent water ingestion over the bow and in the torpedo compartments and lower aft casemates. The lightly built hulls leaked, so that sustained high-speed steaming contaminated the oil tanks with sea water.
A serious flaw in these ships' subdivision was the complete lack of watertight bulkheads anywhere above the main deck or aft on the main deck.
These drawbacks notwithstanding, the US Navy took some pride in the Omaha class. They featured improved compartmentalization; propulsion machinery was laid out on the unit system, with alternating groups of boiler rooms and engine rooms, to prevent immobilization by a single torpedo hit. Magazines were the first to be placed on centerline, below the waterline. These were also the first U.S. Navy cruisers designed after the switch from coal to oil-fired boilers.
Originally designed to serve as scouts, they served throughout the interwar period as leaders of fleet flotillas, helping them resist enemy destroyer attack. Tactical scouting became the province of cruiser aircraft, and the distant scouting role was taken over by the new heavy cruisers spawned by the Washington Naval Treaty. Thus, the Omaha class never performed their designed function. They were relegated to the fleet-screening role, where their high speed and great volume of fire were most appreciated.

### Armament changes

During their careers the Omahas went through several armament changes. Some of these changes were to save weight, while others were to increase their AA armament. On 8 September 1926, the Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Edward W. Eberle, along with the Commanders in Chief of the United States Fleet and Battle Fleet, and their subordinate commanding officers, the Secretary of the Navy, Curtis D. Wilbur, ordered that all mines and the tracks for laying the mines be removed from all of the Omaha-class cruisers, as the working conditions had been found to be very "wet". In 1933–1934, their 3-inch AA guns were increased from two to eight, all mounted in the ship's waist. The lower torpedo tube mounts, which had also proved to be very wet, were removed and the openings plated over before the start of World War II. After 1939, the lower aft 6-inch guns were removed from most of the Omahas and the casemates plated over for the same reason as the lower torpedo mounts. The ships' AA armament was first augmented by three quadruple 1.1-inch (28 mm)/75 gun mounts by early 1942, however, these did not prove reliable and were replaced by twin 40-millimeter (1.57 in) Bofors guns later in the war. At about the same time they also received 20-millimeter (0.79 in) Oerlikon cannons.

## World War II service

Both Detroit and Raleigh were at Pearl Harbor during the Japanese surprise attack, with Raleigh being torpedoed. Detroit, along with St. Louis and Phoenix, were the only large ships to get out of the harbor during the attack.
Most ships of the Omaha class spent the war deployed to secondary theaters and in less vital tasks than those assigned to more recently built cruisers. The Omaha class were sent to places where their significant armament and speed might be useful if called upon, but where their age and limited abilities were less likely to be tested. These secondary destinations included patrols off the east and west coasts of South America, convoy escort in the South Pacific far from the front lines of battle, patrols and shore bombardment along the distant and frigid Aleutians and Kuril Islands chains, and bombardment duty in the invasion of Southern France when naval resistance was expected to be minimal. Marblehead participated in early war actions around the Dutch East Indies (most notably, the Battle of Makassar Strait), and Richmond would engage in the Battle of the Komandorski Islands. The most significant action that any of the ships of the class would see during the war was Detroit during her time in the pacific theater. Detroit would see action in The Battle of Iwo Jima and The Invasion of Okinawa being assigned to the fifth fleet and serving as the flag ship of the Logistics Support Group (TF 50.8).
None of the ships were wartime losses. Raleigh's torpedo damage at Pearl Harbor and Marblehead's damage at Makassar Strait were the only significant wartime combat damage suffered by the class.
The ships of the class were considered obsolete as the war ended, and were decommissioned and scrapped within seven months of the surrender of Japan (with the exception of Milwaukee, which had been loaned to the Soviet Navy, and was scrapped when returned to US Navy control in 1949).

## Ships in class

The following ships of the class were constructed.
Construction data :
| Ship name | Hull no. | Builder | Laid down | Launched | Comm. | Decomm. | Fate |
| Omaha | CL-4 | Todd Dry Dock and Construction Company, Tacoma, Washington | 6 Dec 1918 | 14 Dec 1920 | 24 Feb 1923 | 1 Nov 1945 | Struck 28 Nov 1945; Scrapped Feb 1946 |
| Milwaukee | CL-5 | Todd Dry Dock and Construction Company, Tacoma, Washington | 13 Dec 1918 | 24 Mar 1922 | 20 Jun 1923 | 16 Mar 1949 | Struck 18 Mar 1949; Sold for scrap, 10 Dec 1949 |
| Cincinnati | CL-6 | Todd Dry Dock and Construction Company, Tacoma, Washington | 15 May 1920 | 23 May 1921 | 1 Jan 1924 | 1 Nov 1945 | Scrapped Feb 1946 |
| Raleigh | CL-7 | Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corporation, Fore River Shipyard, Quincy, Massachusetts | 16 Aug 1920 | 25 Oct 1922 | 6 Feb 1924 | 2 Nov 1945 | Struck 28 Nov 1945; Scrapped, Feb 1946 |
| Detroit | CL-8 | Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corporation, Fore River Shipyard, Quincy, Massachusetts | 10 Nov 1920 | 29 Jun 1922 | 31 Jul 1923 | 11 Jan 1946 | Struck 21 Jan 1946; Scrapped, Feb 1946 |
| Richmond | CL-9 | William Cramp & Sons, Philadelphia | 16 Feb 1920 | 29 Sep 1921 | 2 Jul 1923 | 21 Dec 1945 | Struck 21 Jan 1946; Sold for scrap, 18 Dec 1946 |
| Concord | CL-10 | William Cramp & Sons, Philadelphia | 29 Mar 1920 | 15 Dec 1921 | 3 Nov 1923 | 12 Dec 1945 | Struck 8 Jan 1946; Sold for scrap, 21 Jan 1947 |
| Trenton | CL-11 | William Cramp & Sons, Philadelphia | 18 Aug 1920 | 16 Apr 1923 | 19 Apr 1924 | 20 Dec 1945 | Struck 21 Jan 1946; Sold for scrap, 29 Dec 1946 |
| Marblehead | CL-12 | William Cramp & Sons, Philadelphia | 4 Aug 1920 | 9 Oct 1923 | 8 Sep 1924 | 1 Nov 1945 | Struck 28 Nov 1945; Sold for scrap 27 Feb 1946 |
| Memphis | CL-13 | William Cramp & Sons, Philadelphia | 14 Oct 1920 | 17 Apr 1924 | 4 Feb 1925 | 17 Dec 1945 | Struck 8 Jan 1946; Sold for scrap, 18 Dec 1947 |

## Omaha alternatives

Two other Omaha versions were also designed. The first, intended to function as a monitor, had two 14-inch guns in 2 single turrets, while the other design had four 8-inch guns in two twin turrets. The second design eventually evolved into the Pensacola-class cruiser. Furthermore, in 1928 after seeing the successes of Langley a proposed carrier alternative was designed, featuring none of her 2 × twin 6 in/53 caliber turrets, and only including 4 of the original single 6 in/53 caliber turrets.