# New England Wind

New England Wind is a proposed offshore wind energy project developed by Avangrid. It is located approximately 20 nautical miles (37 km) south of Martha's Vineyard and 24 nautical miles (44 km) southwest of Nantucket, Massachusetts. New England Wind's lease areas are situated on the Outer Continental Shelf, in federally leased areas managed by the Bureau of Energy Management (BOEM). Originally titled Vineyard Wind South, the project has been divided into two lease areas. New England Wind 1, formerly known as Park City Wind, will be constructed in the northern lease area OCS-A 0534. New England Wind 2, formerly known as Commonwealth Wind, will be located in the southern lease area OCS-A 0561. The project will be connected to the onshore grid via cables from the wind farm to a substation at Craigville Beach in Barnstable, Massachusetts.
The project's development process spans approximately nine years, beginning with the lease acquisition in 2015 and culminating in key approvals in 2024. During this period, the project encountered several challenges, including financial constraints, geotechnical issues related to glauconitic soils, and regulatory complexities. Despite these obstacles, BOEM approved the project's Construction and Operations Plan (COP) in July 2024, permitting the installation of up to 129 turbines and multiple export cables to connect to onshore infrastructure in Massachusetts. Upon completion, the project is expected to have a generation capacity of up to 2,600 megawatts (MW), which BOEM estimates could supply electricity to approximately 900,000 homes annually.
New England Wind 1 was awarded a contract by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to develop 791 MW of capacity as part of the first multi-state offshore wind procurement under the “Power Up New England” plan, which aims to enhance clean energy development across the region. The Commonwealth's Clean Energy and Climate Plan outlines the actions Massachusetts must undertake to meet its climate goals. New England 1 is one of several offshore wind energy sources Massachusetts intends to utilize to meet its target of procuring 5,600 MW of offshore wind by 2027. Construction for New England Wind 1, is expected to begin in 2025 and become operational by 2029. The second phase, New England Wind 2, is projected to deliver 1,080 MW of power and is currently undergoing state and regional permitting reviews in Massachusetts.

## Development timeline

The New England Wind project development timeline is organized into four major phases: Early Development and Planning, Environmental Review and Permitting, Record of Decision and Approvals, and Construction. BOEM began the leasing process in 2012 by designating a Wind Energy Area off the coast of Massachusetts and auctioning the lease areas within it in 2015. The Lease Area OCS-A 0501 was awarded to Vineyard Wind LLC and later transferred to Park City Wind LLC before being subdivided in 2024 into Lease Area OCS-A 0534 for New England Wind 1, and Lease Area OCS-A 0561 for New England Wind 2. Following environmental reviews and public consultations, federal agencies issued a Record of Decision (ROD) in April 2024, approving the project. BOEM finalized the COP in July 2024, with construction on New England Wind 1 expected to begin in late 2025, while New England Wind 2 remains in the planning phases.
| Early Development & Planning | February 2012: BOEM releases a Call for Information and Nominations to assess commercial interest and identify potential wind energy development areas offshore Massachusetts. May 2012: BOEM designates a 742,974-acre (1,160-square-mile) Wind Energy Area (WEA) south of Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket to facilitate offshore wind leasing. The WEA is divided into four separate leases: OCS-A 0500, OCS-A 0501, OCS-A 0502, and OCS-A 0503. June 2014: BOEM completes an Environmental Assessment (EA) for Lease Area OCS-A 0501, issuing a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). January 2015: BOEM holds a lease auction for Lease Area OCS-A 0501. April 2015: BOEM grants Lease Area OCS-A 0501 to Vineyard Wind LLC, a joint venture of Avangrid Renewables and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners. May 2018: BOEM approves the Site Assessment Plan (SAP) for Lease Area OCS-A 0501. |
| Environmental Review & Permitting | July 2020: Avangrid Renewables LLC submits the initial Construction and Operations Plan (COP) to BOEM. June 2021: BOEM approves the partial assignment of Lease Area OCS-A 0501, transferring 101,590 acres (159 square-miles) to Vineyard Wind LLC, re-designating it as Lease Area OCS-A 0534. June 2021: BOEM publishes a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). December 2021: BOEM approves the assignment of Lease Area OCS-A 0534 from Vineyard Wind LLC to Park City Wind LLC, a subsidiary of Avangrid Renewables. December 2022: BOEM releases the Draft EIS, opening a public comment period. February 2023: The public comment period for the Draft EIS closes. September 2023: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) issues a letter of concurrence and Biological Opinion (BiOp), assessing the project's potential impacts on protected species and habitats. February 2024: BOEM completes the environmental review process. March 2024: BOEM publishes the Final EIS in the Federal Register. March 2024: Park City Wind LLC submits an application to BOEM requesting the partial reassignment of Lease Area OCS-A 0534 to Commonwealth Wind LLC. |
| Record of Decision & Approvals | April 2024: Department of the Interior (DOI), BOEM, Department of the Army, Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) issues a joint Record of Decision (ROD), approving the project's continuation. May 2024: Project is divided into two leases: New England Wind 1 and 2. New England Wind 1 (OCS-A 0534): The northern portion of the original lease is retained by Park City Wind LLC. New England Wind 2 (OCS-A 0561): The southern portion is retained by Commonwealth Wind LLC, a subsidiary of Avangrid Renewables. July 2024: BOEM approves the final COP and easements are granted. |
| Construction & Installation | 2025: Construction activities for New England Wind 1 are anticipated to begin in late 2025, following the completion of pre-construction preparations. |

## Location

The proposed New England Wind project is planned for a location off the coast of Massachusetts, approximately 20 nautical miles (37 kilometers) south of Martha's Vineyard and 24 nautical miles (44 kilometers) southwest of Nantucket. New England Wind 1 is planned for the northern portion of Lease Area OCS-A 0534, with construction expected to begin in late 2025. New England Wind 2, which remains in the early planning stages, is designated for Lease Area OCS-A 0561. Lease Area OCS-A 0561 was created on May 15, 2024, from the southern portion of the original OCS-A 0534 lease, which initially encompassed approximately 101,590 acres (159 square-miles). The subdivision was part of a regulatory process by BOEM to facilitate a phased approach to the project's development. Within the original lease area, New England Wind 1 occupies the northern section, while New England Wind 2 occupies the southern section.

## History of lease area

On February 6, 2012, BOEM issued a Call for Information and Nominations (CIN) seeking input from stakeholders and assessing commercial interest in offshore wind development in federal waters off the coast of Massachusetts. Following environmental assessments and stakeholder consultations, BOEM designated a 742,974-acre (1,160-square-mile) Wind Energy Area (WEA) south of Martha's Vineyard and southwest of Nantucket for offshore wind leasing on May 30, 2012. The WEA was divided into four separate leases: OCS-A 0500, OCS-A 0501, OCS-A 0502, and OCS-A 0503. On June 3, 2014, BOEM completed an Environmental Assessment (EA) for Lease Area OCS-A 0501 and issued a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI), determining that the lease activities would not have significant environmental effects. Following a competitive lease auction on January 29, 2015, BOEM granted Lease Area OCS-A 0501 to Vineyard Wind LLC, a joint venture between Avangrid Renewables and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners, on April 1, 2015. On May 10, 2018, BOEM approved the Site Assessment Plan (SAP) for Lease Area OCS-A 0501, allowing for the installation of equipment to assess wind resources, ocean conditions, and site feasibility.
To facilitate the development of multiple offshore wind projects, Vineyard Wind LLC transferred a portion of its lease holdings, leading to the partial assignment of Lease Area OCS-A 0501. On June 28, 2021, BOEM approved this division, creating Lease Area OCS-A 0534. On December 14, 2021, as part of the restructuring, BOEM approved the reassignment of Lease Area OCS-A 0534 from Vineyard Wind LLC, to Park City Wind LLC, a subsidiary of Avangrid Renewables. As a result, Avangrid gained full ownership of the lease.
While the New England Wind project was planned as two phases, both were initially contained within a single lease, OCS-A 0534. On March 19, 2024, Park City Wind LLC submitted a request to BOEM for the partial reassignment of the lease to Commonwealth Wind LLC, which is also a subsidiary of Avangrid Renewables. This request initiated the subdivision of the lease, allowing each phase to advance through permitting and construction independently, with the goal of expediting overall project development. BOEM formally approved the reassignment on May 15, 2024, creating Lease Area OCS-A 0561 for New England Wind 2, which was allocated to Commonwealth Wind LLC, while New England Wind 1 remained under OCS-A 0534, held by Park City Wind LLC.

## Regulatory & permitting processes

There are three critical parts of the federal regulatory and permitting process, the COP, the SAP, and the EIS. The SAP was approved by BOEM in May 2018. This approval allowed for the installation of equipment to assess proponents of the site such as wind resources, ocean conditions, and overall site feasibility. A Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare a draft EIS was published in June 2021 followed by a public comment period. In December 2022, BOEM releases the draft EIS opening another public comment period. In March, 2024 the final EIS was published in the Federal Register.

## Environmental impact statement

The Final EIS was published in the Federal Register in March 2024. The document contains evaluations of the potential environmental, social, and economic effects of constructing, operating, and decommissioning an offshore wind energy facility. BOEM prepares an EIS for every offshore wind farm in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. It is a lengthy process which involves a public scoping period to gather information on resources, impact-producing factors, alternatives, and potential strategies for impact mitigation. Due to the length of the EIS as well as the depth of information it must contain, the creation of the EIS is often very costly. The estimated cost associated with the construction of the Final EIS for New England Wind 1 and 2 is $2,444,536. Though BOEM oversees the process, the developer (Avangrid) is responsible for covering the whole cost of the environmental review process. BOEM uses the final EIS to inform their decision on whether to approve, approve with modifications, or disapprove the project's COP. Other agencies such as the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) may also use this information to inform their decision making. The Final EIS was approved in March 2024 detailing three primary alternatives:
* Alternative A (No Action): This alternative would leave existing conditions unchanged, not advancing offshore wind development. In this case BOEM would not approve the COP, and therefore, construction, operations, maintenance, and decommission would not take place.
* Alternative B (Proposed Action): This alternative encompasses the full scope of the construction, operation, and decommissioning of the project as proposed by the applicant. The proposed action encompasses 130 wind turbine generators with 2,036 MW of capacity. This alternative would allow for flexibility through the South Coast Variant if logistical or grid interconnection issues prevented a cable interconnection at the West Barnstable Substation. In this case BOEM approved the COP and the project proceeds.
* Alternative C (Habitat Impact Minimization Alternative): This alternative incorporates sub-options designed to reduce ecological disturbances on complex fisheries habitats that consist of stable seafloor with vertical relief that provides more rare habitat types than the sand flats typical of the Outer Continental Shelf. BOEM considers the limitation of offshore export cable corridors to achieve the minimization of harm. While this alternative would prioritize the protection of complex habitat areas, its overall impact ratings would likely be similar to Alternative B. Two sub-alternatives are considered to achieve this:
** Alternative C-1 (Western Muskeget Variant Avoidance): This alternative has a goal to limit the total number of proposed offshore export cable corridor crossings of the Western Muskeget Channel to a single crossing south of the Muskeget Channel.
** Alternative C-2 (Eastern Muskeget Route Minimization): This alternative would aim to minimize the use of Eastern Muskeget route and maximize the use of the Western Muskeget for export cables.
* Preferred Alternative: BOEM identified a combination of aspects of the Alternative B and Alternative C-1 plans as the preferred alternative with the intent to limit the installation of export cables to the Eastern Muskeget route. This would reduce the total amount of impacts on complex benthic habitats as well as minimize potential crossing with other projects export cable routes. The preferred alternative lists a contingency option to use the Western Muskeget Variant if the lessee can provide adequate written justification that its use is necessary for the proposed project's viability. However, this would require review and approval from BOEM. The preferred alternative does not allow the co-location of electrical service platforms and wind turbine generators.
Each of these alternatives were all evaluated for their implications on environmental resources, stakeholder interests, and regional development. Impacts on marine mammals, commercial fisheries, cultural resources and sites, navigational and vessel traffic, and scenic and visual resources were evaluated. Each of these factors were evaluated by looking at potential accidents and incidents such as vessel strikes with marine mammals, accidental releases, land disturbance, lighting, noise, port utilization, and presence of structures. The Final EIS uses a four-level classification scheme considering context, intensity, directionality,and duration of effects, in order to characterize the potential adverse or beneficial impacts of the alternatives as either negligible, minor, moderate, or major.

## Record of decision and approvals

In April 2024, a joint Record of Decision (ROD) by BOEM, The Department of the Interior (DOI) Department of the Army, Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) was issued, approving the project's continuation. In the document, BOEM outlines its decision to approve the project's COP. It also includes the NMFS’ Letter of Authorization (LOA) which permits incidental, but not intentional, take of small numbers of marine mammals under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. This includes take by harassment from activities such as pile driving, site assessment surveys, unexploded ordnance detonations, drilling, and acoustic surveys. USACE granted permits under section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) to ensure that construction of wind turbine generators, electrical service platforms, and transmission cables do not create unreasonable obstructions to navigation of navigable waters on the Outer Continental Shelf. The USACE also granted a permit under section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to ensure potential adverse impacts of discharge of dredged material or fill are minimized. These permits are all required for construction on the project to begin. The ROD follows the requirements of NEPA and includes various mitigation measures, such as marine mammal vessel strike avoidance measures, the use of Protected Species Observers, noise abatement systems, and working with Tribal Nations, to minimize adverse environmental impacts associated with the New England Wind 1 and 2 projects. Avangrid Renewables LLC, also initiated various mandatory regulatory reviews and consultations, ensuring adherence to environmental and historic preservation standards. BOEM announced the final approval of the COP with the “Preferred Alternative” listed in the Final EIS in July 2024.

## Project finance
### Offtake agreement

The full versions of the offtake agreements, offshore renewable energy certificates, and power purchase agreements for the New England Wind project are not publicly accessible.

### Cost and financing structure

Avangrid Renewables LLC, a subsidiary of Avangrid, Inc., is the bidding entity for the development of the New England Wind project, as detailed in Avangrid's March 2024 RFP response prepared for Massachusetts utilities and energy regulators. The company plans to finance both phases of the project through a combination of equity investment and third-party financing, contingent on securing long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs). PPAs provide revenue certainty by guaranteeing committed buyers for the energy and renewable energy certificates (RECs) generated by the projects. This approach aligns with Avangrid's previous financing strategies for large-scale renewable energy projects, including Vineyard Wind 1, the first commercial scale offshore wind farm in the US to achieve financial close.
New England Wind relies on securing PPAs through Massachusetts' state-led Request for Proposal (RFP) process, in which the state solicits bids from developers and selects projects for utility contracts. These agreements are a critical component of the project's financing strategy. In 2020, Avangrid secured 20-year PPAs with Electric Distribution Companies in Massachusetts and Connecticut for the Park City Wind and Commonwealth Wind projects, which were later rebranded as New England Wind 1 and New England Wind 2. One of these agreements, with Connecticut utilities including United Illuminating, was set at a fixed electricity price of $79.83/MWh. However, rising costs due to inflation, supply chain disruptions, and geopolitical instability rendered the projects financially unviable under the original terms. In 2023, Avangrid terminated the agreements, paying $48 million for Commonwealth Wind and $16 million for Park City Wind as part of a negotiated settlement. The projects were subsequently re-bid under their new names, New England 1 and New England 2. As part of this process, Avangrid revised its capital expenditure estimates and adjusted its supply chain strategy to improve project feasibility and cost efficiency. In March 2024, the company submitted a bid proposal for both project phases as part of a regional offshore wind solicitation seeking to secure a new PPA. The proposal is pending approval. The outcome of these solicitations will determine the project's ability to move forward with financing and construction. If awarded a PPA, the company plans to begin construction in late 2025, with the majority of investment occurring between 2027 and 2029, and full commercial operation expected in 2029.
Timeline of New England Wind PPA Developments :
| Year | Date | Key Development |
| 2020 | May 18 | Vineyard Wind LLC signed 20-year PPAs with Connecticut EDCs (Eversource & United Illuminating). |
| 2020 | Aug 19 | The Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) approved the PPAs. |
| 2022 | May 25 | Massachusetts Electric Distribution Companies (EDCs) submitted Commonwealth Wind PPAs to the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (DPU) for approval. |
| 2022 | Oct 20 | Commonwealth Wind informed the DPU that economic conditions made the project financially unviable and sought renegotiation. |
| 2022 | Dec 16 | Commonwealth Wind filed a motion to dismiss PPA proceedings. |
| 2022 | Dec 30 | The DPU denied the motion and approved the PPAs. |
| 2023 | Jul 13 | Avangrid and Massachusetts EDCs terminated the Commonwealth Wind PPAs, with Avangrid forfeiting $48 million. |
| 2023 | Aug 23 | The DPU approved the termination agreements. |
| 2023 | Oct 02 | The termination of Commonwealth Wind took effect, and Avangrid, in agreement with Connecticut EDCs, ended the Park City Wind PPAs, paying $16 million. |
| 2023 | Oct 13 | The Connecticut PURA approved the Park City Wind termination. |
In December 2024, Avangrid became a privately held company following Iberdrola's acquisition of the remaining 18.4% of Avangrid shares that it did not already own. As a wholly owned subsidiary of Iberdrola, its financing strategy for projects such as New England Wind 1 and 2 will be aligned with Iberdrola's broader investment priorities in the renewable energy sector, potentially influencing how funding is allocated to these initiatives going forward.
Other project financing details were initially included in Avangrid's March 2024 RFP response to its recipients. However, these details were later redacted and are no longer accessible as public information.

## Infrastructure development

New England Wind is being developed in two phases, with New England Wind 1 having secured necessary approvals to begin construction, while New England Wind 2 remains in the planning stage.
Construction of New England Wind 1 is planned to commence in late 2025, starting with the installation of onshore interconnection cables. The construction sequence will begin with onshore facilities, followed by the installation of offshore export cables, wind turbine generators (WTGs), and offshore substations (OSSs). Although New England Wind 2 has received federal approval, its construction timeline depends on the completion of remaining permitting processes and the finalization of necessary contracts. As a result, New England Wind 1 is expected to be constructed first, with New England Wind 2 proceeding once all required approvals and agreements are secured.

### Offshore wind farm

New England 1 is planned to have a total generating capacity of up to 804 MW and will include between 41 and 62 WTGs, 2 Electrical Service Platforms (ESPs), and a maximum of 2 offshore export cables. New England 2, which is the larger portion of the project, is anticipated to deliver at least 1,232 MW of power with up to 88 WTGs and 3 ESPs with a maximum of 3 offshore export cables. In total, the proposed project encompasses the installation of up to 129 WTGs, up to 132 foundations and between 1 and 5 ESPs. While specific details on the turbine make and model are not currently available, according to the ROD, the rotor diameter is expected to be 285m, and the height of the turbines will be 935 ft. The foundations will support the turbines themselves while the electrical platforms will facilitate electricity transmission to shore. The project also calls for burying offshore export cables on the seafloor in both the Outer Continental Shelf and within Massachusetts state waters.

### Grid interconnection
#### Point of interconnection (POI)

The project is planned to transmit power onshore through new substations in Massachusetts. It will primarily interconnect with the ISO-New England grid at the West Barnstable 345 kV switching station in Barnstable County. New England Wind 1 will include a 6.7-acre onshore substation at Shootflying Hill Road, equipped with two 220–275 kV / 345 kV step-up transformers. New England Wind 2 plans to construct a separate substation at the Clay Hill site, with an alternative location at Old Falmouth Road, both of which would also connect to West Barnstable. The project design includes a contingency for a potential second point of interconnection in the South Coast of Massachusetts. However, this route would be utilized only if unforeseen issues impede full project interconnection via the Cape Cod route. Potential factors include landfall obstacles on Cape Cod, such as technical difficulties identified during detailed engineering assessments that make bringing cables ashore at the planned Barnstable beach sites unfeasible due to unsuitable seabed conditions or space constraints. Onshore routing issues could also necessitate an alternative approach if underground cable installation along designated roadways and utility rights-of-way to the West Barnstable substation proves impractical due to unforeseen obstructions or permitting challenges. Additionally, grid capacity or reliability concerns may prompt the use of an alternative interconnection point if limitations beyond the developer's control emerge at the West Barnstable substation, such as constraints imposed by ISO-NE or delays in necessary grid upgrades. Despite these contingencies, the West Barnstable 345 kV substation remains the primary planned interconnection site for New England Wind's full capacity.

#### Onshore facilities

The construction plan for New England Wind 1 proposes installing two export cables within the Eastern Offshore Export Cable Corridor (OECC) in the Muskeget Channel, located between Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket. The COP for New England Wind 2 outlines three additional cables within the same corridor, though final configurations remain under review. The primary landing sites for both phases are planned in Barnstable County, with a potential alternative site in Bristol County. Onshore infrastructure is expected to include electrical cables and up to three new or upgraded substations to facilitate grid interconnection.

#### Offshore facilities

The New England Wind project is planned to utilize high-voltage alternating current (HVAC) subsea export cables to transmit electricity from the offshore wind farm to the onshore grid. A total of five export cables are planned, with two serving New England Wind 1 and up to three allocated for New England Wind 2. The New England Wind 1 cables are designed for 220–275 kV AC operation, consistent with other offshore wind projects in Massachusetts. These cables will connect to onshore substation transformers, where the voltage will be increased to 345 kV for integration into the regional grid.
New England Wind 2 may use cables with similar or higher voltage ratings, potentially reaching 345 kV HVAC, to support its larger capacity. Within the wind farm, internal array cables linking turbines to offshore substations will operate at medium-voltage AC, typically ranging from 66 kV to 132 kV. The project has opted for HVAC transmission rather than high-voltage direct current (HVDC) to align with the existing 345 kV onshore network and eliminate the need for offshore converter stations.

## Benefits and concerns
### Socio-economic
#### Jobs and revenue

Economic assessments of the New England Wind project have outlined both potential benefits and drawbacks. Proponents, including government officials, and industry analysts, have emphasized the anticipated economic gains. BOEM has projected that New England 1 will generate over 1,000 full-time equivalent job-years in Connecticut, primarily concentrated in Bridgeport. The agency also anticipates job creation and infrastructure investment in Massachusetts, particularly in Barnstable, where transmission facilities, substations, and offshore wind cable landfall sites will support regional energy integration. According to Avangrid, New England Wind Phase 1 is estimated to generate enough electricity to power approximately 400,000 homes. The project is also projected to create over 4,400 full-time equivalent jobs and generate $3 billion in local investment. This investment includes a new marshalling port in Salem, Massachusetts, and a new offshore wind manufacturing facility in New Bedford, Massachusetts. Moreover, a report by Synapse Energy Economics, commissioned by the Sierra Club, estimates that the deploying 9 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind in New England by 2030 could save ratepayers an average of $630 million annually, with potential savings reaching $1.7 billion in some scenarios. New England Wind is projected to contribute significantly to the offshore wind expansion considered in the analysis, providing up to 2.6 GW out of the 9 GW total, though the study does not isolate cost savings attributable solely to New England Wind.

#### Tourism

Offshore wind projects, including New England Wind 1 & 2, have faced public pushback over concerns that turbines could deter tourists due to their visual impact on the seascape. In the EIS that BOEM prepared, Appendix M of the Draft EIS includes the potential impacts of New England Wind 1 & 2 on recreation and tourism. In which, they concluded, given the distance from shore and the colors chosen for the turbines, there would be little visual impact and minimal impact on tourism.
A 2018 BOEM study found that projects within 7.5 miles of shore were most likely to affect beach experiences. However, a study conducted by NOAA, after the Block Island Wind Farm became operational, showed increased curiosity-driven visits and higher vacation rental rates and reservations.

#### Community agreements

In a press release dated July, 2024, Avangrid announced that New England Wind 1 established a Host Community Agreement with the Town of Barnstable regarding the cable landings in Craigville Beach. This agreement aims to ensure that the Town of Barnstable receives economic protection and benefits resulting from the construction of New England Wind 1. As part of a Massachusetts-Rhode Island-Connecticut Multi-State Procurement for Offshore Wind, New England Wind 1 has contributed to several side agreements intended to provide direct benefits to Barnstable including community mitigation efforts, health and safety measures, and reimbursements during construction and operation of the wind farm. These major agreements are as follows:
* Host Community Agreement with the Town of Barnstable
* Large Generator Interconnection Agreement
* Transmission Support Agreement
* Project Labor Agreement (PLA)
Avangrid signed a Transmission Support Agreement (TSA) with Eversource for New England Wind 1, which received Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approval. They also signed a Large Generator Interconnection Agreement (LGIA) with Eversource and ISO-NE, outlining the necessary grid upgrades and funding necessary to pursue the project while establishing relevant terms and conditions. Through this agreement, Avangrid has committed to providing more than $13.7 million for grid upgrades, which involve converting transmission lines from 115kV to 345kV. Additionally, GIS substations located in Bourne and West Barnstable will be constructed as part of New England Wind Phase II.
The TSA provides the Independent Systems Operator of New England (ISO-NE) with the primary operating authority over commercial transmission facilities while detailing other rights and responsibilities. Avangrid indicated its support for Phase 1 of the grid updates, including construction and energization through the TSA.
In July 2021, Vineyard wind reportedly signed the first Project Labor Agreement (PLA) for an offshore wind project in the US. This agreement aimed to create 500 union jobs. This PLA was signed between the Southeastern Massachusetts Building Trades Unions and Vineyard Wind, intends on providing training and support for trade workers involved with the project. As of December 14, 2024, through two years of construction, Vineyard Wind 1 produced 937 union jobs which is nearly double the committed number of union jobs outlined in the PLA. Additionally, the New England Wind 1 project is estimated to create 3,600 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) job years.
New England Wind 1 has further agreements aiding in facilitating its construction and operation phases. The company signed a lease agreement with Crowley to advancement of the Salem marshaling port through new construction plans and utilization methods. Operations and Management (O&M) facilities will be located in New Bedford and Bridgeport to improve port infrastructure and supply chain efficiency. New England Wind has also executed a partnership agreement with Liftra for a crane manufacturing facility to be built in New Bedford. Furthermore, an agreement with the City of Boston will provide 15 MW of offshore wind energy, which Avangrid noted to be a “first-of-its-kind agreement.” Finally, the project will supply 20 municipal electric companies in Massachusetts with offshore wind energy which can be distributed statewide.

### Climate and environment

The New England Wind project incorporates mitigation measures outlined in its COP and EIS to reduce its environmental impact and maintain compliance with regulatory guidelines. The EIS for the New England Wind project evaluates potential environmental effects across multiple categories. During construction, air quality impacts are expected to be minor, with long-term benefits anticipated as the project reduces regional reliance on fossil fuels. Water quality effects are projected to be negligible throughout both construction and operation. The installation of turbine foundations and transmission cables may cause temporary or permanent disruptions to benthic habitats, however, the assessment suggests that some marine ecosystems may adapt over time, potentially creating new habitat structures.
The assessment identifies moderate risks to birds and bats due to potential turbine collisions, though these effects are weighed against the broader environmental benefits of carbon emissions reductions. Additionally, the document acknowledges that climate change itself could significantly impact benthic ecosystems.
Beyond ecological factors, the assessment also examines potential effects on historic properties, cultural viewsheds, and the commercial fishing industry, particularly regarding changes in access to fishing grounds. The potential for disruptions to local tourism and recreation is also noted. However, the report concludes that these impacts can be mitigated through management strategies such as adaptive monitoring, conservation measures, and stakeholder engagement.
Construction-related noise poses a potential risk to marine mammals by disrupting their behavior and affecting their health. However, the environmental assessment for the New England Wind project indicates that long-term impacts are expected to be minimal with the implementation of mitigation measures. The project's COP outlines specific noise reduction strategies, including the use of a "soft-start" method during pile driving. This technique involves initiating low-energy strikes followed by a waiting period, allowing marine life to vacate the area before the intensity gradually increases. These measures are designed to reduce acoustic disturbances and mitigate potential adverse effects on marine species. In addition to this pile driving method, the final New England Wind EIS outlines specific noise mitigation measures to protect marine mammals during construction activities. One such measure is the use of a big double bubble curtain system during pile driving operations. This technology involves releasing air bubbles from perforated hoses arranged around the piling area on the seafloor, creating a barrier that dampens underwater sound transmission. The EIS specifies that a single bubble curtain must not be used unless paired with another noise attenuation device, and that a big double bubble curtain may be used without being paired with another noise attenuation device. Additionally, the bubble curtains must distribute air bubbles using an air flow rate of at least 0.5 cubic meters per minute per meter, surrounding 100 percent of the piling perimeter throughout the full depth of the water column. These measures are designed to minimize acoustic disturbances and mitigate potential adverse effects on marine species during the project's construction phase.
To avoid potential collisions with whales and other marine mammals, the COP states that all vessels related to the New England Wind project will follow a 10 knot speed limit, regardless of whether the boat is traveling inside or outside of a NOAA-designated North Atlantic right whale critical habitat.
Turbine placement and cable routing for the New England Wind project have also been developed with stakeholder input, including considerations for fisheries. Areas of high value to the fishing industry were excluded from the original WEA to minimize conflicts. A Fisheries Communication Plan will be implemented to facilitate ongoing outreach to potentially affected fisheries. To reduce the risk of entanglement with fishing gear, cable crossings and routes have been strategically designed, and cables will be buried to limit seabed disturbance. The transition from ocean to land will be conducted using horizontal directional drilling, a trenchless method intended to prevent surface disruption and minimize impacts on beaches, intertidal zones, and nearshore habitats.
In an effort to minimize onshore disturbances, the New England Wind COP outlines seasonal restrictions on the construction schedule. Activities at the landfall site are not expected to be performed during the months of June through September, unless they are authorized by the Town of Barnstable.
The Final EIS mentions several methods to reduce the visual impact of New England Wind from the coast. The developer plans to use turbines that are shorter than the maximum specified in the Project Design Envelope. The turbines will be painted using non-reflective paint. Evergreens and vegetative buffers will be planted at the onshore substation, as well as around other infrastructure, to shield nearby residences from the light. Efforts will be made to reduce the amount of light from onshore structures.

### Cultural resources

The New England Wind Project intersects with several historic and cultural sites that may be affected by its development. Notable locations include the Gray Head Lighthouse, valued for its maritime history and unobstructed ocean views, and the Aquinnah Cultural Center and Aquinnah Shops Area, which hold significance for the Wampanoag Tribe and local commerce. The Chappaquiddick Island Traditional Cultural Property (TCP) and the Nantucket Historic District, a designated National Historic Landmark (NHL), are also culturally and historically significant, with their ocean views contributing to their contextual integrity. The Vineyard Sound, Moshup's Bridge, and Nantucket Sound TCPs are also of importance to Indigenous communities. The New England Wind project's cumulative visual effects could alter the settings of these sites, potentially impacting their historical and cultural integrity. To address these concerns, archaeological surveys have been conducted to identify submerged prehistoric sites, historic shipwrecks, and other sensitive areas.

### Stakeholder perspectives and engagement

The New England Wind project engaged with a range of stakeholders, including government agencies, local communities, indigenous groups, environmental organizations, and industry representatives. BOEM led an extensive public consultation process, hosting meetings and reviewing over 750 public comments before issuing a favorable ROD in April 2024. During the environmental review process under the National Environmental Policy Act, BOEM held three virtual public meetings, allowing public inquiries and comments regarding the proposed wind farm. BOEM also accepted comments online. In the open comment period, BOEM received 96 public submissions expressing various concerns and feedback. Numerous comments reflected both support and opposition to the proposed New England Wind project. These comments were reviewed by BOEM to inform future decisions regarding the project.
Some comments expressed concerns about the project:
* Some residents opposed cable landings at Dowses or Craigville Beach, citing potential harm to the ecosystem and concerns about electromagnetic fields affecting marine life and human health. Alternative sites like Hyannis or Woods Hole were suggested.
* Concerns were raised that substations and electric currents could threaten Barnstable's aquifer and water supply.
* Some criticized the slow approval process, arguing that technological advancements might render the turbines outdated by the time they are installed.
* Financial concerns were raised regarding the project's viability, citing PPAs negotiated with Connecticut (New England Wind 1) and Massachusetts (New England Wind 2).
In contrast, other commenters expressed their support:
* Many Cape Cod residents supported offshore wind development, citing its potential to reduce fossil fuel reliance and mitigate climate change, which they viewed as a greater environmental threat than the project's impacts.
* Job creation was highlighted as a key benefit, with optimism that the project would provide stable employment, helping locals remain in the region.
* Some expressed hope that Avangrid Renewables would invest in the local community and support regional initiatives.
At the state level, Avangrid worked with regulators in Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Rhode Island, participating in permitting reviews and negotiating PPA terms for the New England Wind project. On May 19, 2022, Avangrid signed a Host Community Agreement (HCA) with the Town of Barnstable, MA, allowing the transmission cables of New England Wind 1 to land at Craigville Beach. The agreement included $16 million in community fees, seasonal construction restrictions, and coordination with local sewer expansion to minimize disruption. Avangrid participated in state review processes, including Massachusetts Energy Facilities Siting Board (EFSB) proceedings for transmission approvals. In late 2023, the EFSB approved the Craigville Beach cable landing with conditions to address local concerns. That same year, facing economic challenges such as rising supply chain costs, Avangrid consulted with state officials to renegotiate power purchase agreements. The original Massachusetts and Connecticut contracts were ultimately terminated, with Avangrid paying required penalties before rebidding both projects in a new tri-state solicitation.

#### Fisheries and coastal communities

The EIS process for the New England Wind projects includes considerations for various stakeholders, including the fishing community. BOEM conducted public comment periods and stakeholder engagement initiatives to incorporate feedback from fishermen and address potential impacts on fisheries. Appendix D of the Final EIS examines existing conditions and potential effects on commercial fisheries and for-hire recreational fishing, covering a broad analysis area that includes much of the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf. The assessment notes potential impacts on commercial and recreational fishing due to the presence of turbines and related infrastructure. To address these concerns, the EIS recommends continued engagement with the fishing community and the development of compensation mechanisms for potential economic losses.
Prior to its construction, New England Wind also established a comprehensive fisheries engagement program to involve commercial fishermen in the project. The company employed Fisheries Liaisons and assembled a team of Fisheries Representatives from the fishing community to relay industry concerns and disseminate project updates. To facilitate real-time communication, Avangrid partnered with Ithaca Energy to launch the “Waterfront” mobile app, which provided up-to-date marine notices for the wind lease area and direct contact with the Avangrid fisheries team. To mitigate potential disruptions, Avangrid created a Gear Loss/Time Loss Compensation program to reimburse fishermen for damages caused by survey or construction activities. The company also engaged with regional fishing groups through forums like the Massachusetts Fisheries Working Group on Offshore Wind to address industry concerns. Among these concerns are potential disruptions to fishing activities, environmental impacts, and the adequacy of compensation measures. For instance, Connecticut lawmakers have expressed apprehension that offshore wind farms may harm the state's struggling fishing industry by reducing access to key fishing grounds, altering fish migration patterns, and creating navigational hazards that could make certain areas less viable for commercial fishing operations. In June 2023, Avangrid presented its fisheries impact assessment and economic analysis, addressing industry concerns on cable routes, boulder clearance, and cumulative effects on fisheries. Feedback from fishermen, including concerns about scallop grounds and work schedule coordination, led to project siting adjustments to reduce conflicts with high-value fishing areas and other project design modifications.
Avangrid conducted outreach to residents and community groups in coastal areas hosting onshore infrastructure for New England Wind 1. In Barnstable, Massachusetts, the company worked with local officials to address concerns related to beach access, visual impacts, traffic, and environmental protection. As part of the 2022 Host Community Agreement (HCA) with the town, Avangrid committed to restricting cable installation to the fall and winter months to avoid disruptions at Craigville Beach during peak season. Additional provisions included the use of advanced engineering techniques to protect groundwater and coordination with Barnstable's sewer expansion project to minimize road disruptions. The agreement also stipulated that Avangrid would restore staging areas, including repaving any affected portions of the beach parking lot. In Connecticut, Avangrid engaged with the Bridgeport East End community, where its plans to redevelop a waterfront site for New England Wind 1 were received positively for their potential economic benefits. To address concerns related to environmental justice and safety, the company organized local workshops, including offshore wind informational sessions in collaboration with the University of Bridgeport.

#### Indigenous communities

The New England Wind project has actively involved Indigenous communities through formal consultations and benefit agreements aimed at addressing cultural and economic considerations. As part of the federal review under the National Historic Preservation Act, BOEM consulted with Tribal Nations regarding potential impacts on cultural resources. The Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, whose ancestral lands encompass Cape Cod, Martha's Vineyard, and Nantucket, participated in reviewing offshore development plans for the New England Wind project due to their longstanding cultural and historical connections to the region. As part of the federal consultation process, the Tribe engaged with project developers and regulatory agencies to assess potential impacts on submerged ancestral sites, traditional fishing practices, and coastal viewsheds. Their involvement included reviewing archaeological surveys, providing input on cultural resource assessments, and advocating for measures to protect historically significant areas. Additionally, the Tribe has been involved in broader offshore wind discussions, ensuring that Indigenous perspectives are incorporated into decision-making processes related to projects in Southern New England. Avangrid also engaged with the Narragansett Indian Tribe, whose aboriginal waters overlap the lease areas. In 2024, as part of wider offshore wind initiatives, a tribal benefit agreement was announced to support Indigenous participation in the offshore wind industry. The agreement includes funding and training to facilitate involvement in project planning, environmental monitoring, and workforce development. While specific details of Avangrid's agreements with the Narragansett Indian Tribe remain limited, the company has emphasized its commitment to collaboration with Indigenous communities.

#### Environmental and advocacy groups

The New England Wind project has been subject to scrutiny from conservation organizations and climate advocacy groups to ensure environmental protections. Throughout the permitting process, Avangrid engaged with conservation groups both formally, through public comment periods, and informally, through partnerships. Major environmental organizations provided feedback on the Draft EIS, advocating for measures to protect marine life, including the critically endangered North Atlantic right whale, migratory birds, and fisheries habitats. In response, Avangrid adopted mitigation strategies, supported independent research, and became a founding participant in the Regional Wildlife Science Collaborative for Offshore Wind (RWSC). In January 2024, the company endorsed the RWSC's release of an "Integrated Science Plan for Offshore Wind, Wildlife, and Habitat" to guide impact monitoring. Additionally, Avangrid obtained an Incidental Take Regulation from NOAA Fisheries, implementing measures such as seasonal pile-driving restrictions and noise attenuation technologies to minimize harm to marine mammals.
Climate advocacy groups, including the Sierra Club Massachusetts and the Environmental League of Massachusetts (ELM), have generally supported New England Wind for its role in reducing fossil fuel dependence while emphasizing the need for environmental oversight and equitable benefits. Stakeholders have praised the project's commitment to union jobs, community engagement, and biodiversity protections. In response to concerns, Avangrid adjusted plans, including altering turbine layouts to reduce ecological impact and selecting an underground onshore transmission route to protect sensitive habitats. By implementing mitigation measures such as vessel speed limits and artificial reef enhancements, Avangrid responded to stakeholder concerns and gained support from some environmental groups while navigating the regulatory process without facing major legal challenges.

#### Industry and workforce communities

Avangrid engaged with industry groups and trade associations to support the development and integration of New England Wind within the regional clean energy sector. The Northeast Clean Energy Council (NECEC), which represents clean tech companies and investors, served as a platform for Avangrid to promote the project's benefits. NECEC President Joe Curtatone endorsed the completion of BOEM's environmental review of the New England Wind project and emphasized offshore wind's role in a sustainable energy future. Avangrid also participated in industry conferences, such as the American Clean Power Association forums, to engage with developers, technology providers, and maritime industries. Additionally, the company joined the New England for Offshore Wind Coalition, which unites business, environmental, and community groups in support of offshore wind, fostering regional economic and climate alignment.
Labor and workforce development have also been central to Avangrid's stakeholder strategy for the New England Wind Project. The company committed to union labor for construction, securing a PLA with the Massachusetts Building Trades in 2023 to ensure hundreds of skilled union jobs. This agreement built on Avangrid's earlier PLA for Vineyard Wind 1, the first of its kind in U.S. offshore wind. Trade unions, including electricians and ironworkers, were involved in workforce planning, while partnerships with vocational schools and universities, such as Massachusetts Maritime Academy, helped develop offshore wind training programs. Avangrid's collaboration with labor unions provided political backing and reduced workforce-related risks, with union and business council representatives continuing to support the project despite economic challenges.

## Current status & future outlook

As of March 2025, construction of New England Wind 1 is anticipated to begin by the end of the year, while New England Wind 2 remains in the planning phase. However, federal policy changes have introduced potential regulatory uncertainty for the project.
On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order suspending new offshore wind permit and lease approvals while mandating a review of previously authorized projects. The order directs federal agencies to reassess the ecological, economic, and environmental impacts of these developments, which could lead to the reconsideration or revocation of existing leases.
Although New England Wind 1 has secured its lease and federal approvals, the project remains subject to potential regulatory changes following the executive order. The directive to reassess previously authorized projects introduces uncertainty regarding whether construction will proceed as planned. New England Wind 2, which has not yet completed the permitting process, faces a greater risk of delays or cancellation if federal agencies restrict new approvals.
The suspension or delay of these projects could affect Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Rhode Island, which have incorporated offshore wind into their energy procurement strategies. Several pending offshore wind solicitations in these states were structured with the expectation of utilizing energy from New England Wind. Delays or cancellations of these projects could affect state energy procurement plans and offshore wind development goals.