# Recognition of same-sex unions in Latvia

Part of the LGBTQ rights series :
Legal status of same-sex unions :
Marriage
Andorra
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Denmark
Ecuador
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Malta
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Portugal
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Thailand
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Recognized
Israel
United States:
 • American Samoa :
Civil unions or registered partnerships but not marriage
Bolivia
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Hungary
Italy
Latvia
Monaco
Montenegro
San Marino
United Kingdom:
 • Bermuda
 • Cayman Islands :
Minimal recognition
Bulgaria
Cambodia
China
 • Hong Kong
India
Japan
Lithuania
Namibia
Nepal
Netherlands:
 • Sint Maarten
Poland
Romania
Slovakia :
See also
Same-sex union legislation
Same-sex union court cases
Timeline of same-sex marriage
Recognition of same-sex unions in Africa
Recognition of same-sex unions in Asia
Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe
Recognition of same-sex unions in the Americas
Recognition of same-sex unions in Oceania
Marriage privatization
Divorce of same-sex couples
Domestic partnership
Military policy
Adoption
Listings by country
LGBTQ rights by country or territory :
Notes
1 2 Performed in the Netherlands proper (including the Caribbean Netherlands), as well as in Aruba and Curaçao. May be registered in Sint Maarten in such cases, but the rights of marriage are not guaranteed.
↑ Neither performed nor recognized in Niue, Tokelau, or the Cook Islands.
↑ Neither performed nor recognized in six British Overseas Territories.
1 2 Neither performed nor recognized in some tribal nations of the US. Recognized but not performed in several other tribal nations and American Samoa.
↑ Registered foreign marriages confer all marriage rights in Israel. Domestic common-law marriages confer most rights of marriage. Domestic civil marriage recognized by some cities.
1 2 3 4 5 The Coman v. Romania ruling of the European Court of Justice obliges the state to provide residency rights for the foreign spouses of EU citizens. Some member states, including Romania, do not follow the ruling.
↑ A "declaration of family relationship" is available in several of Cambodia's communes which may be useful in matters such as housing, but is not legally binding.
↑ Guardianship agreements confer some limited legal benefits in China, including decisions about medical and personal care.
↑ Hong Kong provides inheritance, guardianship rights, and residency rights for foreign spouses of legal residents.
↑ Indian courts have recognised guru–shishya, nata pratha or maitri karar–type contractual relationships, but they are not legally binding.
↑ Most Japanese cities and prefectures issue partnership certificates, but they are not legally binding.
↑ Marriages conducted abroad between a Namibian national and a foreign spouse provide residency rights in Namibia.
↑ Romania provides hospital visitation rights through a "legal representative" status. :
LGBTQ portal :
vte :
Latvia has recognised same-sex civil unions since 1 July 2024. On 9 November 2023, the Saeima passed legislation establishing civil unions conferring similar rights and obligations as marriage with the exception of adoption and inheritance rights. The bill was signed into law by President Edgars Rinkēvičs in January 2024, and took effect on 1 July 2024. This followed a ruling from the Constitutional Court of Latvia on 12 November 2020 that the Latvian Constitution entitles same-sex couples to receive the same benefits and protections afforded by Latvian law to married opposite-sex couples. However, the Constitution has also prohibited the recognition of same-sex marriage since 2006.

## Civil unions
### Background

On 23 September 1999, the Latvian National Human Rights Office introduced a registered partnership bill to the Saeima. On 28 September 1999, the proposal was sent to the Human Rights and Public Affairs Committee of the Saeima for discussion, but it was rejected by the commission on 30 November 1999. In January 2012, the Ombudsman's Office (the renamed National Human Rights Office since 2007) recommended that the Parliament reject registered partnership legislation. However, after Baltic Pride in June 2012, media revealed that the Ministry of Justice, led by Gaidis Bērziņš, was considering whether to recognise same-sex partnerships, either as unregistered cohabitation or as registered partnerships. Defence Minister Artis Pabriks expressed his support for registered partnerships. Mozaika, Latvia's largest LGBT rights organisation, estimated it would take approximately five years to obtain enough political support to pass the bill.
In November 2014, while commenting on the coming out of the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Edgars Rinkēvičs, and on his call for the recognition of same-sex relationships in Latvia, Prime Minister Laimdota Straujuma reaffirmed her support for the constitutional prohibition on same-sex marriage. She also admitted that "Latvian law has not yet resolved the question of partner-relationships", explaining that the non-recognition of unmarried couples "affects many in Latvia" regardless of sexual orientation and that protection of such families "needs to be discussed by both the community and the Saeima". On 30 January 2015, Veiko Spolītis, an MP from the New Unity party, submitted a bill to modify the Civil Code to legally recognise same-sex partnerships. The proposed law would have allowed "any two persons" to register their partnership and enjoy almost all of the rights and obligations of marriage. The proposal was rejected by the Legal Affairs Committee of the Saeima on 24 February 2015.
On 23 March 2015, the chairperson of For Latvia's Development, Juris Pūce, launched a signature collection campaign on ManaBalss.lv, calling for the passage of a cohabitation law in Latvia. The signatures were submitted to the Saeima in January 2018. In March 2018, the Mandate, Ethics and Submissions Committee recommended 5–4 that the initiative be rejected by the Saeima; 5 out of the 9 committee members voted to recommend rejection, while the 4 others wanted further consideration. In October 2018, the ombudsman called on lawmakers to pass a partnership law for opposite-sex and same-sex couples, citing statistics showing that about half of Latvian children were born out of wedlock, and arguing that these families should enjoy legal protection. On 20 June 2019, MPs voted against sending the bill to further discussion and review in parliamentary committees; only 23 members voted for the bill, 60 voted against it and one member abstained. The Development/For! and New Unity parties and some Social Democrats supported the bill, while the remaining Social Democrats, Who Owns the State?, the New Conservative Party, the National Alliance and the Union of Greens and Farmers as well as several independents were opposed. Supporters of the bill said they would "persevere" and persuade lawmakers to discuss it again in the future.
20 June 2019 vote in the Saeima :
| Party | Voted for | Voted against | Abstained | Absent (Did not vote) |
| Harmony | 6 Valērijs AgešinsVjačeslavs DombrovskisRegīna LočmeleEvija PapuleIgor PimenovBoris Tsilevitch | 11 Jānis ĀdamsonsInga GoldbergaAndrejs KlementjevsIvans KlementjevsJānis KrišānsEdgars KucinsVladimirs NikonovsVitālijs OrlovsIvans RibakovsArtūrs RubiksJānis Tutins | 1 Nikolajs Kabanovs | 4 Sergey DolgopolovĻubova ŠvecovaJānis UrbanovičsIvars Zariņš |
| New Conservative Party | – | 15 Dagmāra Beitnere-Le GallaUldis BudriķisJānis ButānsJānis CielēnsGatis EglītisKrišjānis FeldmansAndris KazinovskisAnita MuižnieceLinda OzolaJuris RancānsSandis RiekstiņšJuta StrīķeEvita Zālīte-GrosaReinis ZnotiņšNormunds Žunna | – | 1 Juris Jurašs |
| Development/For! | 11 Dace BluķeMārtiņš BondarsMarija GolubevaDaniels PavļutsArtūrs Toms PlešsDace Rukšāne-ŠčipčinskaAndris SkrideMārtiņš StaķisMārtiņš ŠteinsVita Anda TēraudaInese Voika | – | – | 2 Ilmārs DūrītisInese Ikstena |
| National Alliance | – | 11 Jānis DombravaRaivis DzintarsJānis IesalnieksIlze IndriksoneRitvars JansonsRihards KolsJanīna Kursīte-PakuleInāra MūrnieceRomāns NaudiņšEdvīns ŠnoreEdmunds Teirumnieks | – | 1 Aleksandrs Kiršteins |
| Who Owns the State? | – | 10 Iveta Benhena-BēkenaAivars GeidānsKaspars ĢirģensArtuss KaimiņšIeva KrapāneJanīna KursīteRamona PetravičaĒriks PucensIvars PugaJānis Vitenbergs | – | 2 Aldis BlumbergsAtis Zakatistovs |
| Union of Greens and Farmers | – | 7 Uldis AugulisRaimonds BergmanisJānis DūklavsJanīna JalinskaArmands KrauzeMāris KučinskisViktors Valainis | – | 4 Anda ČakšaGundars DaudzeDana Reizniece-OzolaJānis Vucāns |
| New Unity | 6 Arvils AšeradensAndrejs JudinsOjārs Ēriks KalniņšRihards KozlovskisAtis LejiņšInese Lībiņa-Egnere | – | – | 2 Aldis AdamovičsAinars Latkovskis |
| Unaffiliated | – | 6 Aldis GobzemsLinda LiepiņaInguna RībenaKarina SprūdeJūlija StepaņenkoDidzis Šmits | – | – |
| Total | 23 | 60 | 1 | 16 |
| Total | 23.0% | 60.0% | 1.0% | 16.0% |
On 29 October 2020, the Saeima voted 55–30 to reject a popular initiative entitled "Registration of same-sex partners" (Viendzimuma partneru reģistrēšana), signed by 10,392 citizens, which called for the passage of a civil union law. That same day, the authors of the initiative started a new petition, called "For Legal Protection of All Families" (Par Visu Ģimeņu Tiesisko Aizsardzību), which had been signed by 23,392 citizens by March 2022.

### Constitutional Court ruling and proposed legislation

On 12 November 2020, the Constitutional Court of Latvia ruled that the labour law violated Article 110 of the Constitution of Latvia, as it did not provide parental leave to the non-biological parent in a same-sex relationship. Although Article 110 has defined marriage as "a union between a man and a woman" since 2006, the term "family" is not explicitly defined. The court held that the family is not solely a union based on marriage, but a social institution formed by close personal ties based on understanding and respect. The court ruled that the Constitution requires the state to protect same-sex partners, and gave the Saeima until 1 June 2022 to amend the labour law and introduce a measure to legally protect same-sex couples. The Supreme Court ruled in December 2021 that should the government fail to provide a way for same-sex partners to register their relationship by the 1 June deadline, couples would be able to have their relationship recognized by a court. On 2 February 2022, the Ministry of Justice, led by Dzintars Rasnačs, presented a civil union bill that would have provided same-sex couples with some of the rights and benefits of marriage. The second largest parliamentary group in the Saeima, the New Conservative Party, announced its support for the bill, despite the party having opposed all previous attempts to establish civil unions. The leader of the Social Democratic Party, Jānis Urbanovičs, also indicated that the bill might receive broader support from the members of his parliamentary group.
On 31 March 2022, the Saeima sent the civil union bill to the Legal Affairs Committee and approved it in first reading, with those opposed boycotting the vote in hopes that the Saeima would fail to meet the necessary quorum, but ultimately failing with exactly half of all MPs participating in the vote.
31 March 2022 vote in the Saeima :
| Party | Voted for | Voted against | Abstained | Absent (Did not vote) |
| Harmony | 4 Inga GoldbergaRegīna LočmeleIgor PimenovBoris Tsilevitch | 7 Andrejs KlementjevsJānis KrišānsEdgars KucinsVladimirs NikonovsVitālijs OrlovsIvans RibakovsArtūrs Rubiks | 2 Sergey DolgopolovNikolajs Kabanovs | 5 Valērijs AgešinsIvans KlementjevsJānis TutinsZenta TretjakaJānis Urbanovičs |
| New Conservative Party | 12 Ainars BaškisUldis BudriķisJānis ButānsJānis CielēnsKrišjānis FeldmansLīva KreituseEva MārtužaLinda MedneJuris RancānsSandis RiekstiņšReinis ZnotiņšNormunds Žunna | – | – | 4 Ieva AkuratereDagmāra Beitnere-Le GallaAivars GeidānsEvita Zālīte-Grosa |
| Development/For! | 11 Krista BaumaneMārtiņš BondarsIlmārs DūrītisViesturs LiepkalnsJuris PūceDace Rukšāne-ŠčipčinskaAndris SkrideMārtiņš ŠteinsVita Anda TēraudaInese VoikaGatis Zamurs | – | – | 1 Aigars Bikše |
| National Alliance | – | – | – | 12 Jānis DombravaRaivis DzintarsJānis IesalnieksIlze IndriksoneRitvars JansonsAleksandrs KiršteinsRihards KolsJanīna Kursīte-PakuleInāra MūrnieceIvars PugaEdvīns ŠnoreEdmunds Teirumnieks |
| Union of Greens and Farmers | – | – | – | 11 Uldis AugulisRaimonds BergmanisGundars DaudzeJānis DūklavsJanīna JalinskaArmands KrauzeMāris KučinskisEdgars TavarsDidzis ŠmitsViktors ValainisJānis Vucāns |
| New Unity | 9 Arvils AšeradensIveta Benhena-BēkenaAnda ČakšaAndrejs JudinsRihards KozlovskisAinars LatkovskisAtis LejiņšInese Lībiņa-EgnereKārlis Šadurskis | – | – | 2 Aldis AdamovičsAldis Blumbergs |
| The Independents | – | – | – | 6 Aldis GobzemsIeva KrapāneMāris MožvilloRalfs NemiroRamona PetravičaKarina Sprūde |
| Unaffiliated | 5 Vjačeslavs DombrovskisArtuss KaimiņšEvija PapuleIlga ŠuplinskaAtis Zakatistovs | – | – | 9 Jānis ĀdamsonsKaspars ĢirģensJanīna KursīteMāris MičerevskisRomāns NaudiņšĒriks PucensInguna RībenaJulija StepanenkoĻubova Švecova |
| Total | 41 | 7 | 2 | 50 |
| Total | 41.0% | 7.0% | 2.0% | 50.0% |
The bill's final reading was blocked on 2 June due to a lack of quorum, as only 40 MPs participated in the vote, and Speaker Ināra Mūrniece ended the parliamentary session without the bill being passed. The legislation was placed on the agenda for a future sitting of Parliament, and needed to pass before the parliamentary election held on 1 October 2022. As a result, the 1 June deadline by the Constitutional Court expired, meaning that same-sex couples could now apply with a court to request recognition of their relationship and enjoy some of the benefits and obligations offered by marriage. The Vice-President of the Constitutional Court, Irēna Kucina, said that "institutions and administrative courts will apply the Constitution directly". On 30 May, the Administrative District Court in Riga granted the first application from a same-sex couple and recognised the "public legal existence" of their relationship, concluding that the couple had a "relationship that fits the definition outlined in Article 110 of the Constitution". The court lamented that the Saeima had not "fulfilled its duty". The Administrative District Court had recognized four same-sex couples by 8 July 2022, and 16 couples by 28 October 2022.
The proposed legislation in the Saeima would have established civil unions providing some of the rights, obligations and benefits of marriage, including in the areas of inheritance and tax. The bill would have also allowed same-sex partners to obtain information on the health of a hospitalised partner and make emergency health decisions, receive benefits in the event their partner dies, and claim care for their partner in the event that they have a disability. Civil unions would have been open to all adult citizens and non-residents of Latvia, including refugees and stateless people, but would not have been allowed to persons who are already married, in another civil union or who are blood relatives or related by adoption. They would have been registered and dissolved using a procedure similar to that for civil marriage. However, the bill would have not allowed same-sex couples to share a common surname or to adopt. In addition, parties to a civil union would not have automatically become heirs to the common property, but the partners would have been able to draw up a will or a contract of inheritance to legally contract for how their protected common property would have been divided before any eventual separation.
On 6 December 2022, following the October elections and the formation of a new government, the Legal Affairs Committee rejected the proposed civil union bill. However, registering a relationship with the courts was still possible. In January 2023, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights ruled in Fedotova and Others v. Russia that Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which guarantees a right to private and family life, places a positive obligation on all member states of the Council of Europe to recognize same-sex partnerships.

### Passage of legislation in 2023

Following Krišjānis Kariņš' resignation as prime minister in August 2023, a new government, led by Prime Minister Evika Siliņa and consisting of the New Unity, the Union of Greens and Farmers and The Progressives, was sworn in on 15 September 2023. A political analyst said, "The most significant policy shift could be the new government’s intention to legislate on human rights, such as to try to allow marriages for same-sex couples [sic]." Kaspars Briškens, party leader of The Progressives, said there is "a willingness [in the government] to work on a new Law on Cohabitation for same-sex persons". On 26 October 2023, the New Unity party proposed a newly-drafted legislative package recognising same-sex unions. The legislation would establish civil unions (Latvian: civilā savienība, pronounced) providing the same rights and benefits of marriage with the exception of adoption and inheritance rights. On 30 October, Prime Minister Siliņa announced that the coalition government had decided to support the bill, and that there was unanimous support for the legislation from The Progressives and the Union of Greens and Farmers, as well as Independent MP Oļegs Burovs, who had previously stated his opposition to same-sex unions. On 2 November, the legislation passed its first reading in the Saeima by a 53–40 vote, with all 52 coalition MPs and Burovs voting in favour. On 9 November, the legislation passed its second and final reading in the Saeima by a 53–43 vote.
However, 34 opposition MPs tabled a motion asking President Edgars Rinkēvičs to delay promulgating the bill until January 2024. Opponents were seeking to collect 154,241 signatures (10% of voters) in order to proceed with a referendum on the civil union law. Rinkēvičs reacted, "This [suspension of publication of the law] will be done in accordance with the Constitution. Saeima deputies have the right to exercise their constitutional rights, and now, the society, citizens of Latvia, have two months to support this idea or not." Prime Minister Siliņa welcomed the law's passage, tweeting, "This is a good day. Society has taken an important step in creating a modern and humane Latvia." The Central Election Commission reported on 26 December that 16,170 signatures had been collected by then. Only 35,191 signatures had been collected by the deadline on 5 January 2024, meaning that the referendum initiative had failed. The bill was subsequently signed into law by Rinkēvičs and took effect on 1 July 2024. The first civil union was performed in Riga on 1 July between Maksims Ringo and Jānis Locs.

## Same-sex marriage
### Constitution

In December 2005, the Saeima voted 65–5 to approve an amendment to the Constitution of Latvia banning same-sex marriage. The amendment took effect on 17 January 2006. Article 110 reads: "The State shall protect and support marriage — a union between a man and a woman, the family, the rights of parents and rights of the child".

### Court cases
#### 2018 European Court of Justice ruling

On 5 June 2018, the European Court of Justice ruled that member states of the European Union (EU) must recognise the freedom of movement and residency rights of same-sex spouses, provided one partner is an EU citizen. The court ruled that EU member states may choose whether or not to allow same-sex marriage, but they cannot obstruct the freedom of residence of an EU citizen and their spouse. In addition, the court ruled that the term "spouse" is gender-neutral and does not necessarily imply a person of the opposite sex. The Latvian Government and the Office of Citizenship and Migration Affairs announced their intention to abide by the ruling. Later that same month, a Russian national, who had married her Latvian same-sex partner in Portugal, received a residence permit allowing her to reside with her spouse in Latvia.

#### 2021 Supreme Court ruling

In 2015, two same-sex couples attempted to register their marriages at the Registry Office in Riga, which refused citing Latvia's constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. The Administrative District Court, and later the Administrative Regional Court, ruled against the couples, holding that the recognition of same-sex marriage was not possible in Latvia and that this was a matter for the Parliament to deal with. In May 2016, the Supreme Court of Latvia overturned the Administrative Regional Court's decision. A court press spokeswoman said that the court agreed with the administrative courts that current regulations do not allow for same-sex marriages to be legally recognized in Latvia; however, the matter "should have been considered in a context not of marriage, but of registering familial partnership". Additionally, it "would have been impossible to conclude whether the applicants' rights had been violated unless their claim was accepted and reviewed in a proper manner."
In June 2021, the Supreme Court submitted a petition to the Constitutional Court of Latvia and stayed proceedings in the case. The Constitution Court had already ruled in November 2020 that the Constitution imposes an obligation on the Parliament to establish a legal framework for same-sex unions. In July 2021, the Constitutional Court rejected the petition, stating that the Supreme Court had not properly explained why its November 2020 ruling was not applicable in this case. Subsequently, the Supreme Court ruled in December 2021 that Latvia lacks a civil partnership law and that court rulings could serve as a substitute for the registration of same-sex relationships until lawmakers pass a partnership law. It ruled that same-sex couples could ask regional courts to recognize their relationships in line with the Law on Registration of Civil Status Acts (Latvian: Civilstāvokļa aktu reģistrācijas likums) if the Saeima failed to adopt legislation protecting same-sex couples. The court held that, "The obligation to ensure the legal protection of same-sex couples also follows from the principle of human dignity, which requires recognizing the inherent dignity and equal value of each human being." The ruling states:
   Until Parliament has created an appropriate legal framework, a judgment establishing that the relationships of certain persons are to be recognized as family relationships within the meaning of Article 110 of the Constitution will replace the registration of these relationships by the State. […] Summarizing the above, it can be concluded that the first sentence of Article 110 of the Constitution, in conjunction with the principle of human dignity, establishes a legal obligation on the State to ensure legal recognition of the family relations of same-sex couples. In the absence of a specific legal framework, the law enforcer, including the court, is obliged to ensure the effective implementation of the Constitution and human rights. […] Therefore, the judgment of the regional court is annulled.

## Public opinion

The 2015 Eurobarometer found that 19% of Latvians supported same-sex marriage. In 2019, the Eurobarometer showed that support had increased to 24%, while 70% were opposed.
A GLOBSEC survey conducted in March 2023 showed that 40% of Latvians supported same-sex marriage, while 46% were opposed and 14% were undecided. The 2023 Eurobarometer found that 36% of Latvians thought same-sex marriage should be allowed throughout Europe, while 59% were opposed. The survey also found that 35% of Latvians thought that "there is nothing wrong in a sexual relationship between two persons of the same sex", while 59% disagreed.