# Gaius Antius Restio

Gaius Antius Restio (fl. 68–53 BC) was a politician of the Roman Republic. He is principally known for the lex Antia sumptuaria, a law against luxury he passed as tribune of the plebs in 68 BC. This law forbade magistrates from attending banquets, in an attempt to contain political corruption. One of the few sources on Restio's life is a poem of his contemporary Catullus, telling that he was an enemy of Publius Sestius, a politician and good friend of Cicero.

## Life

Restio was a homo novus ("new man"), the first of his family to enter the Senate. He belonged to an obscure plebeian gens, which only emerged in the second half of the second century BC, with a Marcus Antius Briso, tribune of the plebs in 137. Like several other Roman families inventing mythical origins, the Antii claimed descent from Hercules through his son Antiades. Modern scholars have suggested they came from Minturnae, or Lanuvium, both Latin cities south of Rome.

### Lex Antia (68 BC)

Between 82 and 80, the conservative dictator Sulla amended the constitution of the Roman Republic, notably by curtailing the powers of the tribunes of the plebs. In 70, the consul Pompey restored the tribunes' former prerogatives, which they used to push for radical legislation, especially against political corruption and malpractices. Restio was elected tribune in this context, and took office on 10 December 69.
During his office, Restio passed the Lex Antia sumptuaria, the last of a long list of sumptuary laws passed during the Roman Republic. The terms of the law are not known except that it forbade magistrates from accepting invitations to attend banquets. This ban closed a loophole in the previous legislation, which still permitted magistrates to use friends as surrogate organisers of political banquets. The law was likely directed at politicians who campaigned through extravagant banquets at the time, such as Quintus Hortensius (consul in 69) and Lucius Lucullus (consul in 74), whose private luxury was proverbial. Restio then refused to attend any banquet in order to stay true to his beliefs.

### In Catullus 44

   O my farm, whether Sabine or Tiburtine (for they say that you're Tiburtine, they for whom it is not pleasing to harm Catullus; but they for whom it is pleasing assert that you are Sabine by any wager), but whether Sabine or more truly Tiburtine, I was gladly in your suburban villa and I expelled a bad cough from my chest, which my stomach gave to me, not undeserving, while I seek a lavish dinner: for, while I wish to be a Sestian guest, I read the speech “Against the Candidate Antius”, full of poison and pestilence. At this point, a chilling illness and persistent cough shook me continually, until I fled to your embrace, and I restored myself both by leisure and nettle (an herb). Therefore I, cured, give my highest thanks to you, because you have not punished my mistake. So I pray, if I again pick up the malicious writings of Sestius, that their chill bring an illness and cough not upon me, but rather upon Sestius himself, he who invites me only when I have read his bad book.
Publius Sestius, a friend of Cicero, is described by Catullus in one of his poems as having made a violent speech against Restio, while the latter was said to be a petitor. This word can be translated as a candidate for an election, or a plaintiff during a trial, although the former meaning is favoured in modern publications. If the second meaning (petitor as plaintiff) is considered true, it would likely mean that Restio sued Sestius for breaking the lex Antia. Sestius is also described as hosting lavish banquets, hence his enmity towards Restio. The modern historian Francis Ryan suggests that Restio is the one described running for election in 54 or 53 in a letter of Cicero. As he is mentioned alongside his political allies Marcus Porcius Cato and Marcus Favonius—both known for their asceticism like him—Restio either aimed at becoming the colleague of Cato as praetor in 54, or that of Favonius as aedile in 54 or 53. Restio apparently lost the elections, perhaps against Marcus Aufidius—a former tribune of the plebs elected alongside Favonius—who received the cognomen Lurco ("glutton" in Latin), a striking contrast with Restio's austerity. It was probably during this campaign between Restio and Lurco that Sestius' speech against Restio was pronounced.
Restio had a son, also named Gaius, who was triumvir monetalis in 47 and minted denarii bearing a portrait of his father. Restio's son was also a supporter of Julius Caesar during the Civil war against Pompey, but was later caught in the proscriptions of the Second Triumvirate in 43.