# 2006 Washington Initiative 933

Elections in Washington :
Federal government
Presidential elections
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Presidential primaries
Democratic
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Republican
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
U.S. Senate elections
1889
1891
1893
1895 sp
1897
1899
1903
1905
1909
1911
1914
1916
1920
1922
1928
1934
1940
1946
1952
1956
1958
1962
1964
1968
1970
1974
1976
1980
1982
1983 sp
1986
1988
1992
1994
1998
2000
2004
2006
2010
2012
2016
2018
2022
2024
2028
U.S. House of Representatives elections
1889
1890
1892
1894
1896
1898
1900
1902
1904
1906
1908
1909
2nd sp
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
1920
1922
1923
5th sp
1924
1926
1928
1930
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
1942
1944
1946
1947
3rd sp
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
3rd sp
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1975
3rd sp
1976
1977
7th sp
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
1st sp
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
2026 :
State government
General elections
2004
2008
2010
2012
2016
2020
2024
Gubernatorial elections
1889
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Lieutenant gubernatorial elections
2020
2024
Secretary of State elections
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2022 sp
2024
Attorney General elections
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
State Treasurer elections
2024
State Auditor elections
2024
Commissioner of Public Lands elections
2024
State Senate elections
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2013
26th sp
2014
2016
2017
45th sp
2018
2020
2022
2024
House of Representatives elections
2006
2008
2010
21st
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
Supreme Court elections
2004
2006
2008
2012 :
Ballot measures
1972
276
2004
872
2006
920
933
937
4223
2007
67
2008
1000
2009
71
2012
74
502
1185
1240
2016
732
2018
1631
1639
2019
976
2024
2066
2109
2117
2124 :
Seattle
Mayoral elections
2005
2009
2013
2017
2021
2025
City Attorney elections
2021
City Council elections
2019
2021
3rd recall
2023
Ballot measures
Sound Transit 3 :
Spokane
Mayoral elections
2011
2015
2019
2023 :
vte :
Ballot Initiative 933 was a ballot initiative in the U.S. state of Washington in 2006. It concerned land use planning, and was voted down by 59% in the 2006 elections.
The controversial initiative pitted the interests of real estate developers against environmental protection and preservation of natural resources.
The initiative is also known as I-933, titled "Property Rights" by the Secretary of State, "The Property Fairness Initiative" by its supporters, and the "Developers Initiative" by its opponents.

## Content of the proposal

I-933 called for government agencies in the State of Washington to evaluate the effects directly on private real and personal property when implementing regulations or ordinances. It called for these government agencies to follow certain policies: either pay compensation when "damaging" property, to consider "less restrictive means," or to waive the implementation of the regulation.

## Cost

According to a study conducted by the University of Washington the initiative would have cost taxpayers an estimated $7.8 Billion during the first five years after enactment. The same study also found that "Virtually every county would likely be faced with claims, yet none have a tax revenue source in place for paying them."

## Other effects

I-933 would have impacted critical areas that are protected to prevent flooding and protect fish, wildlife and groundwater. Though it was described as establishing a "pay or waive" system, I-933 did not have the power to permit waivers in most relevant cases. This would have resulted in a "stymied decision" and uncertainty for both landowners and local governments, with the result of slowing down development permits.
I-933 would likely have led to a greater role for federal government in the region.
The initiative would have had implications not only for real estate, but on intellectual property rights, water rights, motor vehicles, securities and intangible commercial assets.

## People and organizations involved
### Supporters

Supporters of I-933 argued that the proposal would have protected private property owners from "excessive land-use regulations or proposed regulations that damage the use and value of private property."
A significant portion of the financial support for the campaign came from Americans for Limited Government, a libertarian-oriented group based in Illinois.
Other supporters of the measure included:
* Bainbridge Citizens United
* Spokane Pro-America
* Washington Cattleman's Association
* Washington Contract Loggers Association
* Farm Bureaus from Washington State

### Opponents

Opponents of the initiative questioned why taxpayers should have "to pay some land owners to follow laws already on the books or waive those protections for the community". I-933 required taxpayers to pay legal fees for all claims, including retroactive claims. Opponents of the proposal also pointed out that the Washington Farm Bureau represents primarily large corporations and has an established record of supporting Republican candidates with PAC money. The Association of Washington Cities argued the Initiative would have cost taxpayers 4.5 billion dollars a year in claims against municipalities. Environmentalists claimed "Initiative 933 would dismantle ... (environmental) protections, making it extremely difficult to enforce the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act." Moreover, I-933 allocated no funding for the payments it required, raising fears that taxes would have been increased and/or that funding to key infrastructural programs would have been cut. Lobbyists in favor of the bill dismissed these accusations as scare tactics. On October 10, 2006, all six of Washington's living former governors joined current Gov. Christine Gregoire to oppose Initiative 933. "I-933 is an extremely vague and loophole-ridden initiative that exposes our taxpayers to great expense," said former Gov. Gary Locke.
Organizations that opposed the initiative included:
* Former Governors Booth Gardner (D), Daniel J. Evans (R), Gary Locke (D), Mike Lowry (D), John Spellman (R)
* State Senators Luke Esser (R), Mary Margaret Haugen (D)
* State Representatives Fred Jarrett (R), Sam Hunt (D)
* American Institute of Architects, Washington Council and Seattle Chapter
* Greater Seattle Chamber of Commerce
* American Planning Association
* Washington State Building Trades
* AFSCME - Washington State Council of County & City Employees
* Washington State Labor Council
* Various neighborhood associations
* Washington Association of Churches
* American Lung Association of Washington
* Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility
* National Wildlife Federation
* United Farm Workers
* Amalgamated Transit Union Locals 1015 and 757
* American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees - Councils 2 and 28
* International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Locals 112 and 483
* Ironworkers Local 14
* National Association of Letter Carriers 791
* Service Employees International Union, Washington State Council
* UNITE HERE Local 8
* United Food and Commercial Workers - Washington State Council and Local 21
* Democracy for America (Bellingham and Kitsap Bainbridge)
* Washington State Democrats, and 12 county committees and 17 legislative districts
* King County Young Democrats
* Green Party of Washington State
* League of Women Voters of Washington
* Permanent Defense
* American Federation of Teachers, Washington
* Audubon Society Washington
* Sierra Club Northwest and Cascade Chapter
* Surfrider Foundation Northwest Straits and Seattle Chapters
* The Nature Conservancy of Washington
* Cascade Bicycle Club
* Washington Conservation Voters
* Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians

## Precedents

I-933 was similar to Initiative 164, a 1995 bill passed by the Washington legislature and subsequently repealed by ballot initiative (referendum 48.)
It was also similar to Oregon Ballot Measure 37 (2004), as well as numerous 2006 initiatives promoted in other states (nearly all of which were defeated.)