# 2006 United States Senate election in Missouri

Elections in Missouri :
Federal government
Presidential elections
1820
1824
1828
1832
1836
1840
1844
1848
1852
1856
1860
1864
1868
1872
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Missouri bellwether
Presidential primaries
Democratic
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Republican
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
U.S. Senate
1821
1825
1827
1830
1833
1836
1839
1842
1843 sp
1845
1849
1851
1857
1857 sp
1861
1863
1863 sp
1868
1871 sp
1874
1879
1879 sp
1881
1885
1887
1891
1893
1897
1899
1903
1905
1909
1911
1911
1914
1916
1918 sp
1920
1922
1926
1926 sp
1928
1932
1934
1938
1940
1944
1946
1950
1952
1956
1958
1960 sp
1962
1964
1968
1970
1974
1976
1980
1982
1986
1988
1992
1994
1998
2000
2002 sp
2004
2006
2010
2012
2016
2018
2022
2024
2028
U.S. House of Representatives
1820
1822
1824
1826
1828
1831
1832–33
1835
1836
1838
1839
AL sp
1840
1842
1844
1846
AL sp
1848
1850
1852
1854
1856
1858
1860
1st sp
1862
1864
1866
1867
3rd sp
1868
5th sp
1870
1872
1874
1876
1878
1880
7th sp
1882
2nd sp
1884
1886
1888
1889
4th sp
1890
14th sp
1892
1894
1896
1897
1st sp
1898
1899
8th sp
1900
1902
12th sp
1904
1906
1908
1910
6th sp
1912
1914
1916
1918
10th sp
1920
1921
4th sp
1922
1924
1926
11th sp
1928
1929
4th sp
1930
1931
7th sp
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
1942
1943
6th sp
1944
1946
1948
10th sp
1950
1951
11th sp
1952
1954
1956
1958
1959
4th sp
1960
1962
1964
9th sp
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
6th sp
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
8th sp
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2013
8th sp
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024 :
State government
State elections
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
Gubernatorial elections
1820
1824
1825 sp
1828
1832
1836
1840
1844
1848
1852
1856
1857 sp
1860
1864
1868
1870
1872
1874
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Lieutenant gubernatorial elections
1820
1824
1828
1832
1836
1840
1844
1848
1852
1856
1860
1864
1868
1870
1872
1874
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Secretary of State elections
2012
2016
2020
2024
Attorney General elections
2012
2016
2020
2024
State Treasurer elections
2012
2016
2020
2024
State Auditor elections
2010
2014
2018
2022
Senate elections
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
House of Representatives elections
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
2026 :
Ballot measures
1999
Proposition B
2004
Amendment 2
2006
Amendment 2
2018
Proposition A
2020
Amendment 2
2022
Amendment 3
2024
Amendment 3 :
Columbia
Mayoral elections
2016
2019
2022
2025 :
Jefferson City
Mayoral elections
2015
2019
2023 :
St. Charles
Mayoral elections
2003
2007
2011
2015
2019
2023 :
Kansas City
Mayoral elections
2003
2007
2011
2015
2019
2023 :
Springfield
Mayoral elections
2021
2025 :
St. Louis
Mayoral elections
1973
1977
1981
1985
1989
1993
1997
2001
2005
2009
2013
2017
2021
2025
Board of Aldermen elections
2023 :
O'Fallon
Mayoral elections
2001
2005
2009
2013
2017
2021
2025 :
vte :
The 2006 United States Senate election in Missouri was held November 7, 2006, to decide who would serve as senator for Missouri between January 3, 2007, and January 3, 2013. This election was the fifth consecutive even-number year in which a senate election was held in Missouri after elections in 1998, 2000, 2002, and 2004.
Incumbent Republican Senator Jim Talent was elected in a 2002 special election over incumbent Democrat Jean Carnahan, who was appointed to the Senate seat after the posthumous election of her husband Mel Carnahan, who died in a plane crash shortly before the 2000 election. Talent ran for re-election for his first full term; his Democratic opponent was Missouri State Auditor Claire McCaskill.
Both Talent and McCaskill faced unknowns in their respective primaries on August 8 and defeated them soundly. Early on the morning of November 8, Talent conceded defeat to McCaskill, having faced considerable political headwinds. Talent lost the election with 47% of the vote, to 50% of the vote for McCaskill. This was the last election an incumbent Republican senator lost in Missouri. McCaskill's victory brought the Democratic Party the Senate majority for the first time since they had lost it in 1994.

## Background

The election was always expected to be very close, given the seat had changed hands twice, both by very narrow margins, in the prior six years. In 2000, the late Missouri Governor Mel Carnahan, a Democrat, narrowly defeated incumbent Republican Senator John Ashcroft 50% to 48%. Mel Carnahan died in a plane crash before election day, so his wife Jean Carnahan was appointed to the seat after the election. Two years later, in a special election held for the seat, incumbent Senator Jean Carnahan lost an even closer election to former Congressman Jim Talent, 50% to 49%.

### State politics

The state of Missouri was a bellwether state throughout the twentieth century. It had voted for the winner of every presidential election starting in 1904, except for in 1956, when the state narrowly favored Adlai Stevenson over Dwight D. Eisenhower.
The state itself is bordered by both the South and Midwestern United States. In statewide elections for much of the prior century, Missouri had favored the Democratic Party. Beginning in 2000, however, Missouri began a gradual drift toward the Republican Party. In the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections, George W. Bush carried Missouri with a margin slightly greater than he received nationally.
Bush's 2004 victory also saw Missouri Republicans triumph in several down-ballot elections. Senator Kit Bond was re-elected by a decisive margin, and Matt Blunt won the election for Governor, narrowly defeating state auditor Claire McCaskill. The Republican Party also captured control of the state legislature for the first time in eighty years.

### National significance

The Missouri contest was seen as vitally important to control of the United States Senate. Democrats needed to win six seats to take control of the chamber with 51 seats. To do this, they would need to retain their 19 incumbent seats, win two Republican-held seats in states won by John Kerry in 2004 (Rhode Island and Pennsylvania), and win four races in five states Bush had won (Missouri, Montana, Ohio, Tennessee and Virginia). Thus, if Talent were re-elected, Republicans would need to win only one other seat to retain control of the Senate.

## General election
### Candidates

* Frank Gilmour, small business owner (Libertarian)
* Lydia Lewis, retired functional systems analyst (Progressive)
* Claire McCaskill, State Auditor of Missouri, former State Representative and nominee for Governor in 2004 (Democratic)
* Jim Talent, incumbent U.S. Senator since 2002 (Republican)

### Campaign

Talent, anticipating a tough re-election battle and attempting to dissuade challengers, had accumulated a large campaign fund. For most of 2005, he had no opposition. State Senator Chuck Graham had briefly entered the race early in the year, but dropped out soon after. However, on August 30, 2005, Democrat Claire McCaskill announced her intention to run for Talent's Senate seat.
McCaskill started with a large financial disadvantage, but she was also an experienced candidate with high name recognition. McCaskill had run two successful campaigns for state auditor. She was also a candidate for governor in 2004, when she defeated the incumbent Democratic Governor Bob Holden in the primary election but lost with 48% of the vote in the general election.
Talent started statewide advertising on August 1, 2006, forcing some observers to suggest that Talent was on the ropes and therefore needed to reassert his image (damaged recently by his "flip-flopping" on stem cell research, his opposition to raising the minimum wage and a general feeling of antipathy from the body politic regarding his lack of notable achievements while in the Senate) and pull ahead in a statistical dead heat.

#### Embryonic stem cell research

Since joining the Senate in 2002, Talent had supported federal legislation that would ban stem cell research. This included co-sponsoring a bill (S.658) sponsored by Senator Sam Brownback which would ban all forms of human cloning, including the cloning and destruction of human embryos.
On February 10, 2006, Talent withdrew his support for the bill, citing the need to balance research and protection against human cloning. This move followed criticism by Talent's Democratic opponent in the 2006 election, Claire McCaskill, as well as pressure from Missouri business interests that oppose restrictions on stem cell research. Though this reversal was widely criticized as being due to politics, Talent told the Associated Press, "The technology is changing all the time and so I'm always considering whether there is a better way to strike the balance.". Talent suggests that moral concerns might be put to rest through a possible future scientific breakthrough - replicating embryonic stem cells without the use of cloned embryos.
Proposed Constitutional Amendment 2 would amend the state constitution and allow, in line with federal law, stem cell research and treatment. On May 1, 2006, Talent announced his opposition to the proposed ballot-initiative. Stem cell research and treatment is working up to be a divisive issue for many Republicans and is taking a particular prominence in Missouri. In the senate, he subsequently voted against expanding federal funds for embryonic stem cell research in July 2006.

#### Michael J. Fox commercial

Actor Michael J. Fox, who has Parkinson's disease, appeared in a television campaign commercial for Claire McCaskill in late October, stated that Talent wanted to criminalize embryonic stem cell research. The commercial, which was one of many Fox had appeared in for politicians of both major political parties supportive of such research, made national headlines.
Rush Limbaugh, conservative radio talk show host, commented on the TV commercial, saying that Fox was "really shameless" and that he was "either off his medication or acting." Limbaugh speculated that Fox may have intentionally not taken his medication to exaggerate the effects of his illness, saying "He's moving all around and shaking, and it's purely an act." Limbaugh followed up on October 25, 2006, saying, "When you wade into political life you have every right to say what you want, but you cannot in turn argue that no one has the right to take you on."
Elaine Richman, a neuroscientist, stated, "Anyone who knows the disease well would regard his movement as classic severe Parkinson's disease. Any other interpretation is misinformed." On October 26, Fox responded to Limbaugh's claims, saying in an interview with Katie Couric, "The irony of it is that I was too medicated." He added that his condition during their interview reflected "a dearth of medication — not by design. I just take it, and it kicks in when it kicks in." He further laughed, "That's funny — the notion that you could calculate it for effect."

### Fundraising

Talent had a huge cash-on-hand advantage over McCaskill. Because of the way FEC filing works, Talent's numbers include the money he raised during his 2002 special election campaign. Totals are through July 19.
| Candidate | Funds Raised | Cash On-Hand |
| Jim Talent (R) | $19,602,725 | $6,921,577 |
| Claire McCaskill (D) | $4,572,707 | $2,684,766 |

### Debates

* Complete video of debate, September 15, 2006
* Complete video of debate, October 8, 2006
* Complete video of debate, October 16, 2006
* Complete video of debate, October 18, 2006

### Endorsements
#### Individuals

* Wesley Clark, General, 2004 democratic presidential candidate
Organizations
* National Women's Political Caucus

### Predictions

| Source | Ranking | As of |
| The Cook Political Report | Tossup | November 6, 2006 |
| Sabato's Crystal Ball | Tilt D (flip) | November 6, 2006 |
| Rothenberg Political Report | Lean D (flip) | November 6, 2006 |
| Real Clear Politics | Tossup | November 6, 2006 |

### Polling

A June 19–22, 2006 Research 2000 poll showed Talent's favorability rating was 47%-46%, with 7% having no opinion. Soon after, a St. Louis Post-Dispatch poll was released showing McCaskill with 49% favorability to Talent's 43%.
| Source | Date | Claire McCaskill (D) | Jim Talent (R) | Frank Gilmour (L) |
| Rasmussen | September 1, 2005 | 46% | 46% |
| Rasmussen | November 9, 2005 | 47% | 45% |
| Rasmussen | January 2, 2006 | 46% | 43% |
| Research 2000 | January 21, 2006 | 47% | 44% |
| Rasmussen | February 8, 2006 | 41% | 46% |
| Rasmussen | March 6, 2006 | 43% | 40% |
| Zogby/WSJ | March 31, 2006 | 45% | 48% |
| Rasmussen | April 4, 2006 | 42% | 41% |
| Rasmussen | May 8, 2006 | 40% | 43% |
| Zogby/WSJ | June 21, 2006 | 44% | 49% |
| Research 2000 | June 24, 2006 | 49% | 43% |
| Rasmussen | June 27, 2006 | 42% | 42% |
| Rasmussen | July 20, 2006 | 45% | 42% |
| Zogby/WSJ | July 24, 2006 | 45% | 49% |
| Rasmussen | July 31, 2006 | 45% | 42% |
| SurveyUSA | August 15, 2006 | 47% | 46% | 2% |
| Rasmussen | August 15, 2006 | 44% | 46% |
| Zogby/WSJ | August 28, 2006 | 45% | 50% |
| Research 2000 | September 1, 2006 | 47% | 46% | 2% |
| USA Today/Gallup | September 5, 2006 | 44% | 50% |
| Zogby/WSJ | September 11, 2006 | 45% | 49% |
| SurveyUSA | September 14, 2006 | 48% | 47% | 1% |
| Rasmussen | September 15, 2006 | 45% | 42% |
| Zogby/WSJ | September 28, 2006 | 45% | 47% |
| Mason-Dixon/MSNBC | October 2, 2006 | 43% | 43% |
| Reuters/Zogby | October 5, 2006 | 39% | 43% |
| USA Today/Gallup | October 5, 2006 | 48% | 45% |
| Rasmussen | October 7, 2006 | 44% | 43% |
| SurveyUSA | October 12, 2006 | 51% | 42% | 3% |
| Rasmussen | October 13, 2006 | 44% | 45% |
| Bennett, Petts & Blumenthal (D) | October 13, 2006 | 48% | 43% |
| Mason-Dixon/McClatchy-MSNBC | October 24, 2006 | 46% | 43% |
| SurveyUSA | October 24, 2006 | 45% | 48% | 2% |
| Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg | October 24, 2006 | 45% | 48% |
| Rasmussen | October 27, 2006 | 46% | 48% |
| Research 2000 | October 28, 2006 | 47% | 47% | 2% |
| Rasmussen | October 30, 2006 | 48% | 47% |
| CNN/Opinion Research Corporation | October 31, 2006 | 49% | 49% |
| SurveyUSA | October 31, 2006 | 49% | 46% | 2% |
| Reuters/Zogby | November 2, 2006 | 46% | 43% | 6% |
| Rasmussen | November 2, 2006 | 49% | 48% |
| Mason-Dixon/MSNBC-McClatchy | November 3, 2006 | 46% | 45% |
| Rasmussen | November 5, 2006 | 48% | 49% |
| USA Today/Gallup | November 5, 2006 | 49% | 45% |
| SurveyUSA | November 5, 2006 | 51% | 42% | 4% |
| SurveyUSA | November 6, 2006 | 50% | 44% | 3% |
| Polimetrix | November 6, 2006 | 50% | 50% |
| OnPoint Polling and Research | November 6, 2006 | 49% | 46% |

#### Polling and candidate positions

In single-issue polling, Talent's positions contradicted the majority of voters in the election on most issues: 66% of Missouri voters favored raising the minimum wage to $6.50 an hour; 62% of Missouri voters favored raising taxes to replace Medicaid funding cut by the current Republican Governor, Matt Blunt; 54% opposed a law that would require all Missourians to show a photo ID before they vote; 58% favored campaign donation limitations; and 66% favored restoring Medicaid coverage to about 90,000 Missourians who lost coverage when Blunt and the Republican legislature tightened eligibility requirements.

### Results

When the polls closed in Missouri on election night the race was, as expected, too close to call. With 85% of the vote in and with still no call, McCaskill claimed victory. At the time McCaskill declared victory, she was ahead by a vote margin of 867,683 to Talent's 842,251 votes; in percentage terms, with 85% of the vote in, McCaskill led Talent, 49% to 48%. Finally, at 11:38 P.M. Central Time the Associated Press called McCaskill as the winner. St. Louis County, adjacent to St. Louis, and Jackson County, home of Kansas City, are probably what pushed McCaskill over the finish line.
General election results :
| Party | Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% |
| | Democratic | Claire McCaskill | 1,055,255 | 49.58% | +0.91% |
| | Republican | Jim Talent (incumbent) | 1,006,941 | 47.31% | −2.49% |
| | Libertarian | Frank Gilmour | 47,792 | 2.25% | +1.27% |
| | Progressive Party | Lydia Lewis | 18,383 | 0.86% | n/a |
| | Write-in | Write-in | 88 | 0.00% | n/a |
| Total votes | Total votes | Total votes | 2,128,459 | 100.0 | n/a |
| | Democratic gain from Republican | Democratic gain from Republican | Democratic gain from Republican | Democratic gain from Republican | Democratic gain from Republican |

#### Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic

* Hickory (Largest city: Hermitage)
* Platte (Largest city: Kansas City)
* Carroll (Largest city: Carrollton)
* Oregon (Largest city: Thayer)

#### Counties that flipped from Democratic to Republican

* Bates (Largest city: Butler)
* Lafayette (Largest city: Odessa)
* Clark (Largest city: Kahoka)
* Cass (Largest city: Harrisonville)
* Schuyler (Largest city: Lancaster)