# Chris Pallis

Part of a series on :
Libertarian socialism :
Political concepts
Anti-authoritarianism
Class conflict
Decentralization
Egalitarian community
Free association
Mutual aid
Revolutionary spontaneity
Workers' control :
Economics
Anti-capitalism
Co-operative economics
Decentralized planning
Economic democracy
Industrial democracy
Participatory economics
Socialization
Socialist economics
Worker cooperative
Workers' self-management :
People
Albert
Andrews
Bakunin
Berkman
Bookchin
Camus
Castoriadis
Chomsky
Cole
Déjacque
Foot
Fotopoulos
Fourier
Guérin
Kropotkin
Lefort
Luxemburg
Makhno
Marcos
Margall
Morris
Marcuse
Negri
Öcalan
Pallis
Pankhurst
Pannekoek
Proudhon
Rocker
Russell
Rühle :
Philosophies and tendencies
Anarchist tendencies
Social anarchism
Communist
Collectivist
Individualist anarchism
Market
Mutualism
Anarcho-syndicalism
Marxist tendencies
Autonomism
Chaulieu–Montal tendency
Communization
Council communism
Situationism
Western Marxism
Other tendencies
Democratic confederalism
Guild socialism
Libertarian municipalism
Utopian socialism
Neozapatismo :
History
International Workingmen's Association
Revolutions of 1917–1923
Makhnovshchina
Korean People's Association in Manchuria
Spanish Revolution of 1936
New Left
New social movements
Zapatista uprising
MAREZ
Rojava Revolution
AANES :
Related topics
Communism
Libertarianism
Social democracy
Socialism
Democratic socialism
Eco-socialism
Syndicalism :
Anarchism portal
Libertarianism portal
Socialism portal
Politics portal :
vte :
Christopher Agamemnon Pallis (2 December 1923 – 10 March 2005) was an Anglo-Greek neurologist and libertarian socialist intellectual. Under the pen names Martin Grainger and Maurice Brinton, he wrote and translated for the British group Solidarity from 1960 until the early 1980s. As a neurologist, he produced the accepted criteria for brainstem death, and wrote the entry on death for Encyclopædia Britannica.

## Life

Chris Pallis was born in Bombay, British Raj, to a prominent Anglo-Greek family, "of whose intellectual achievements he was always extremely proud". The poet Alexandros Pallis was a great-uncle, and so the writers Marietta Pallis and Marco Pallis were also relatives. His father Alex was general manager of the family firm of merchant bankers, Ralli Brothers; when he retired, he returned from India to settle in Switzerland. Educated there, Chris Pallis became fluent in French, English and Greek.
In 1940, the family managed to take the last boat out of France, and settled in England. Pallis went on to study medicine at Balliol College, Oxford in 1941. He joined the Communist Party of Great Britain, but he was quickly expelled for criticising its policy on the Second World War, and became a member of the Trotskyist Revolutionary Communist Party.
For the next 20 years he combined a distinguished medical career under his real name with pseudonymous revolutionary socialist writing and translation. After he was outed for his use of the name Martin Grainger in such left-wing journals as the New Statesman he changed his pseudonym. Subsequently his boss, Christopher Booth, defended him from further press criticism, saying that he was a fine neurologist entitled to his own political views.
Pallis's published works include several eyewitness accounts of key moments in European left politics, such as the Belgian general strike of 1960–1961, the May 1968 events in France, and Portugal's Carnation Revolution in 1974–75; a substantial body of English translations of works by Cornelius Castoriadis, the main thinker of the French group Socialisme ou Barbarie; and two short books of his own: The Bolsheviks and Workers' Control (1970) and The Irrational in Politics (1974), which is largely concerned with sexual politics.
The publishers of a recent online edition of The Bolsheviks and Workers' Control describe it as follows:
   The Bolsheviks and Workers' Control is a remarkable pamphlet by Maurice Brinton exposing the struggle that took place over the running of workplaces in the immediate aftermath of the Russian Revolution. In doing so not only does it demolish the romantic Leninist 'history' of the relationship between the working class and their party during these years (1917–21) but it also provides a backbone to understanding why the Russian revolution failed in the way it did. From this understanding flows alternative possibilities of revolutionary organisation and some 26 years after the original was written this is perhaps its greatest contribution today. For this reason alone this text deserves the greatest possible circulation today and we encourage you to link to it, download the text or otherwise circulate it.