# 2006 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania

"none" is preferred when the title is already sufficiently detailed; see [[WP:SDNONE]]
Elections in Pennsylvania :
Federal government
U.S. President
1789
1792
1796
1800
1804
1808
1812
1816
1820
1824
1828
1832
1836
1840
1844
1848
1852
1856
1860
1864
1868
1872
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Presidential primaries
Democratic
2000
2004
2008
2016
2020
2024
Republican
2008
2016
2020
2024
U.S. Senate
1788
1791
1793 sp
1794 sp
1795
1796
1797
1801
1801 sp
1802
1806
1808
1808 sp
1809 sp
1812
1814
1814 sp
1818
1820
1824
1826
1830
1831 sp
1832
1834 sp
1836
1840 sp
1843
1845
1845 sp
1849
1851
1856
1857
1861
1861 sp
1863
1867
1869
1873
1875
1877 sp
1879
1881
1885
1887
1891
1893
1897
1899
1901 sp
1903
1905
1905 sp
1908
1909
1909 sp
1911
1914
1916
1920
1922
1922 sp
1926
1928
1930 sp
1932
1934
1938
1940
1944
1946
1950
1952
1956
1958
1962
1964
1968
1970
1974
1976
1980
1982
1986
1988
1991 sp
1992
1994
1998
2000
2004
2006
2010
2012
2016
2018
2022
2024
2028
U.S. House of Representatives
1788
1791
1792
1794
1796
5th sp
1797
5th sp
1798
1st sp
4th sp
1800
8th sp
1801
4th sp
8th sp
12th sp
1802
1804
10th sp
1805
4th sp
11th sp
1806
1st sp
1808
1st sp
1809
1st sp
1810
1812
1813
3rd sp
5th sp
7th sp
13th sp
15th sp
1814
2nd sp
3rd sp
1815
1st sp
3rd sp
9th sp
1816
9th sp
1817
10th sp
1818
4th sp
6th sp
1820
5th sp
7th sp
1821
5th sp
10th sp
1822
1st sp
6th sp
7th sp
14th sp
1824
8th sp
13th sp
1825
16th sp
1826
2nd sp
7th sp
13th sp
18th sp
1827
2nd sp
1828
1829
8th sp
16th sp
1830
1831
11th sp
1832
1833
1st sp
1834
1836
13th sp
24th sp
1837
3rd sp
1838
9th sp
1839
14th sp
1840
13th sp
22nd sp
1841
2nd sp
13th sp
20th sp
18th sp
Jun
Dec
1842
17th sp
21st sp
1843
1844
12th sp
13th sp
21st sp
1846
1848
6th sp
1850
11th sp
15th sp
1852
1854
8th sp
1856
1857
12th sp
1858
8th sp
1860
8th sp
1861
2nd sp
12th sp
1862
7th sp
1864
1866
1867
12th sp
1868
9th sp
20th sp
1870
1872
13th sp
1874
23rd sp
1876
12th sp
1878
1880
1882
1884
19th sp
1885
19th sp
1886
1888
1890
3rd sp
4th sp
1892
1893
2nd sp
8th sp
1894
at-large sp
1895
15th sp
1896
1897
25th sp
1898
23rd sp
1899
9th sp
1900
5th sp
1901
10th sp
1902
17th sp
1903
4th sp
1904
3rd sp
1906
2nd sp
3rd sp
12th sp
1907
2nd sp
1908
1910
1911
2nd sp
14th sp
1912
1st sp
1914
1916
1917
28th sp
1918
1919
22nd sp
1920
3rd sp
1921
at-large sp
1922
1924
1926
1927
1st sp
1928
8th sp
1929
12th sp
1930
1931
2nd sp
1932
6th sp
18th sp
20th sp
1933
9th sp
1934
1936
1937
18th sp
1938
1939
4th sp
1940
1941
15th sp
1942
11th sp
12th sp
33rd sp
1943
2nd sp
23rd sp
1944
2nd sp
17th sp
1946
10th sp
23rd sp
33rd sp
1947
8th sp
1948
1949
22nd sp
26th sp
1950
1951
8th sp
14th sp
33rd sp
1952
1954
1956
2nd sp
30th sp
1957
13th sp
1958
4th sp
21st sp
1960
17th sp
18th sp
1961
16th sp
1962
1963
15th sp
23rd sp
1964
5th sp
1966
1968
1970
9th sp
1971
18th sp
1972
27th sp
1974
12th sp
1976
1st sp
1978
1980
11th sp
12th sp
1981
3rd sp
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1991
2nd sp
1992
1994
1996
1998
1st sp
2000
2001
9th sp
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
12th sp
2012
2014
2016
2nd sp
2018
7th sp
15th sp
18th sp
2019
12th sp
2020
2022
2024 :
State government
Governor
1790
1793
1796
1799
1802
1805
1808
1811
1814
1817
1820
1823
1826
1829
1832
1835
1838
1841
1844
1847
1848
1851
1854
1857
1860
1863
1866
1869
1872
1875
1878
1882
1886
1890
1894
1898
1902
1906
1910
1914
1918
1922
1926
1930
1934
1938
1942
1946
1950
1954
1958
1962
1966
1970
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
2026
Lieutenant Governor
1874
1878
1882
1886
1890
1894
1898
1902
1906
1910
1914
1918
1922
1926
1930
1934
1938
1942
1946
1950
1954
1958
1962
1966
1970
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
Attorney General
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Auditor General
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
State Treasurer
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
State Senate
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
State House of Representatives
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024 :
Elections by year
State elections
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025 :
Philadelphia
Mayoral elections
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1856
1858
1860
1862
1865
1868
1871
1874
1877
1881
1884
1887
1891
1895
1899
1903
1907
1911
1915
1919
1923
1927
1931
1935
1939
1943
1947
1951
1955
1959
1963
1967
1971
1975
1979
1983
1987
1991
1995
1999
2003
2007
2011
2015
2019
2023
City Council elections
1951
1954 sp.
1955
1959
1963
2015
2019
2022–23 sp.
2023
Other municipal elections
1951
1953
1955
1957
1959
1961
1963
2023 :
Pittsburgh
Mayors
1909
1913
1917
1921
1925
1929
1933
1937
1941
1945
1949
1953
1957
1959
1961
1965
1969
1973
1977
1981
1985
1989
1993
1997
2001
2005
2007
2009
2013
2017
2021
2025 :
Allentown
Mayors
1977
1981
1985
1989
1993
1997
2001
2005
2009
2013
2017
2019 sp
2021
2025 :
Lancaster
Mayors
2009
2017
2021
2025 :
Harrisburg
Mayors
1969
1973
1977
1981
1985
1989
1993
1997
2001
2005
2009
2013
2017
2021
2025 :
Government :
vte :
The 2006 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania was held on November 7, 2006. Incumbent Republican Rick Santorum ran for re-election to a third term, but was easily defeated by Democratic State Treasurer Bob Casey, Jr., the son of former Governor Bob Casey Sr. Casey was elected to serve between January 3, 2007 and January 3, 2013.
Santorum trailed Casey in every public poll taken during the campaign. Casey's margin of victory (nearly 18% of those who voted) was the largest ever for a Democratic Senate nominee in Pennsylvania, the largest margin of victory for a Senate challenger in the 2006 elections, and the largest general election margin of defeat for an incumbent U.S. senator since 1980. Casey was the first Pennsylvania Democrat to win a full term in the Senate since Joseph S. Clark Jr. in 1962, and the first Democrat to win a Senate election since 1991. He was the first Democrat to win a full term for this seat since 1940.
As of 2025, this was the last time the following counties have voted Democratic in a Senate election: Greene, Washington, Westmoreland, Somerset, Lawrence, Mercer, Armstrong, Indiana, Cambria, Warren, Forest, Elk, Clearfield, Clinton, Schuylkill, Columbia, and Carbon. This was also the last time an incumbent senator from Pennsylvania lost re-election until 2024, when Casey was defeated by David McCormick.

## Republican primary
### Candidates
#### Nominee

* Rick Santorum, incumbent U.S. senator and former U.S. congressman for Pennsylvania's 18th congressional district (1991–1995)

#### Withdrew

* John Featherman, Libertarian nominee for U.S. Senate in 2000
Featherman withdrew his candidacy after a Republican party petition challenge because he did not have the necessary number of signatures to get on the ballot. As a result, Santorum won the Republican nomination unopposed.

### Results

2006 Republican U.S. Senate primary :
| Party | Party | Candidate | Votes | % |
| | Republican | Rick Santorum (incumbent) | 561,952 | 100.00% |
| Total votes | Total votes | Total votes | 561,952 | 100.00% |

## Democratic primary

The Democratic primary was held May 16, 2006.

### Candidates
#### Nominee

* Bob Casey Jr., State Treasurer, former State Auditor General, candidate for Governor in 2002 and son of former Governor Bob Casey, Sr.

#### Eliminated in primary

* Chuck Pennacchio, University of the Arts history professor
* Alan Sandals, attorney

#### Declined

* Barbara Hafer, former State Auditor General and State Treasurer
* Joe Hoeffel, U.S. Representative

### Results

Casey won a landslide victory in the primary.
2006 Democratic U.S. Senate primary :
| Party | Party | Candidate | Votes | % |
| | Democratic | Bob Casey, Jr. | 629,271 | 84.48% |
| | Democratic | Chuck Pennacchio | 66,364 | 8.91% |
| | Democratic | Alan Sandals | 48,113 | 6.46% |
| | Write-in | Write-in | 1,114 | 0.15% |
| Total votes | Total votes | Total votes | 744,862 | 100.00% |

## General election
### Candidates

* Bob Casey Jr., State Treasurer (Democratic)
* Rick Santorum, incumbent U.S. Senator (Republican)

#### Declined

* Kate Michelman, former president of NARAL Pro-Choice America (Independent)
Michelman decided against running and tacitly endorsed Casey in March 2006

#### Disqualified

* Carl Romanelli, rail industry consultant (Green)
Romanelli was removed from the ballot by a Commonwealth Court judge on September 25, 2006, following a challenge from Democrats for failing to collect enough valid signatures required of third-party candidates. He lost the appeal to the state Supreme Court challenging the required number of signatures, on October 3, 2006 Carl Romanelli was ordered to pay more than $80,000 in legal fees stemming from his failed effort to make the ballot.

### Campaign
#### Santorum's support for Arlen Specter

Republican strategists took Santorum's primary result in 2006 as a bad omen, in which he ran unopposed for the Republican nomination. Republican gubernatorial nominee Lynn Swann, also unopposed, garnered 22,000 more votes statewide than Santorum in the primary, meaning thousands of Republican voters abstained from endorsing Santorum for another Senate term. This may have been partly due to Santorum's support for Arlen Specter over Congressman Pat Toomey in the 2004 Republican primary for the U.S. Senate. Even though Santorum was only slightly less conservative than Toomey, he joined virtually all of the state and national Republican establishment in supporting the moderate Specter. This led many socially and fiscally conservative Republicans to consider Santorum's support of Specter to be a betrayal of their cause. However, Santorum said he supported Specter to avoid risking a Toomey loss in the general election, which would have prevented President George W. Bush's judicial nominees from Senate confirmation. Santorum says Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito would not have been confirmed without the help of Specter, who was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee at the time.

#### Santorum's controversial views

In the Senate, Santorum was an outspoken conservative from a state with a history of electing moderates. This led many political commentators to speculate that his low approval ratings were due to some of his more controversial statements and opinions.
Among these controversies were his views on the privatization of Social Security and the teaching of intelligent design in public schools. In addition, his involvement in the Terri Schiavo case was considered by many in his state to be out of place.
All this left Santorum in a precarious position throughout the race. On May 31, 2006, the polling firm Rasmussen Reports declared that Santorum was the "most vulnerable incumbent" among the senators running for re-election. SurveyUSA polling taken right before the election showed that Santorum was the least popular of all 100 senators, with a 38% approval rating and a net approval rating of -19%.

#### Santorum's residency

While Santorum maintained a small residence in Penn Hills, a township near Pittsburgh, his family primarily lived in a large house in Leesburg, a suburb of Washington, D.C. in Northern Virginia. Santorum faced charges of hypocrisy from critics who noted the similarities between his living situation and that of former Representative Doug Walgren, who Santorum defeated in 1990. Back then, Santorum had claimed that Walgren was out of touch with his district; these claims were backed up with commercials showing Walgren's home in the Virginia suburbs.
On NBC's Meet the Press on September 3, 2006, Santorum admitted that he only spent "maybe a month a year, something like that" at his Pennsylvania residence.
Santorum also drew criticism for enrolling five of his six children in an online "cyber school" in Pennsylvania's Allegheny County (home to Pittsburgh and most of its suburbs), despite the fact that the children lived in Virginia. The Penn Hills School District was billed $73,000 in tuition for the cyber classes.

#### Casey's momentum

Santorum began his contrast campaign against Casey early, charging him with relentlessly seeking higher political office and failing to take definitive stands on issues. While these charges kept the race competitive, in late September and through October, Casey's campaign seemed to regain the momentum it had had throughout most of the campaign, as most polls showed Casey widening his lead after a summer slump. In a Quinnipiac University Polling Institute poll, released on September 26, 2006, Casey was favored by 14 points. An October 18, 2006 poll conducted by Rasmussen Reports showed Casey with a similar double-digit lead. In the Rasmussen poll, only 46% of voters surveyed had a favorable view of Santorum, while 57% of voters viewed Casey favorably.

#### Negative advertisements

At least one of Santorum's television ads called into question his campaign's use of the facts regarding Casey and people who had donated money to the Casey campaign. The ad, which aired in September, showed several men seated around a table, while talking amongst themselves and smoking cigars, inside a jail cell. While none of the figures, who were played by actors, were named personally, the narrator provided the job descriptions, previous donations to Casey, and ethical and/or legal troubles of each. The Santorum campaign later provided the names of the people portrayed. An editorial in Casey's hometown newspaper, The Times-Tribune, pointed out that all but one of the contributions "[was] made to Casey campaigns when he was running for other offices, at which time none of the contributors were known to be under investigation for anything." In fact, two of the persons cited in the Santorum campaign ad had actually given contributions to Santorum's 2006 Senate campaign. Another of the figures portrayed had died in 2004. Political scientist Larry Sabato called the ad "over the top" and suspected that the fallout would hurt Santorum.

### Debates

* Complete video of debate, September 3, 2006
* Complete video of debate, October 12, 2006
* Complete video of debate, October 16, 2006

### Predictions

| Source | Ranking | As of |
| The Cook Political Report | Lean D (flip) | November 6, 2006 |
| Sabato's Crystal Ball | Safe D (flip) | November 6, 2006 |
| Rothenberg Political Report | Likely D (flip) | November 6, 2006 |
| Real Clear Politics | Likely D (flip) | November 6, 2006 |

### Polling

| Source | Date | Bob Casey Jr. (D) | Rick Santorum (R) |
| Quinnipiac | February 16, 2005 | 46% | 41% |
| SurveyUSA | March 8–9, 2005 | 49% | 42% |
| Keystone | March 22, 2005 | 44% | 43% |
| Quinnipiac | April 23, 2005 | 49% | 35% |
| Keystone | June 6, 2005 | 44% | 37% |
| Quinnipiac | July 13, 2005 | 50% | 39% |
| Rasmussen | July 22, 2005 | 52% | 41% |
| Strategic Vision (R) | July 31, 2005 | 51% | 40% |
| Strategic Vision (R) | September 12, 2005 | 52% | 38% |
| Keystone | September 13, 2005 | 50% | 37% |
| Quinnipiac | October 3, 2005 | 52% | 34% |
| Strategic Vision (R) | October 16, 2005 | 52% | 36% |
| Keystone | November 10, 2005 | 51% | 35% |
| Rasmussen | November 10, 2005 | 54% | 34% |
| Strategic Vision (R) | November 16, 2005 | 51% | 36% |
| Quinnipiac | December 13, 2005 | 50% | 38% |
| Strategic Vision (R) | December 18, 2005 | 50% | 39% |
| Rasmussen | January 15, 2006 | 53% | 38% |
| Strategic Vision (R) | January 25, 2006 | 50% | 40% |
| Keystone | February 9, 2006 | 50% | 39% |
| Quinnipiac | February 13, 2006 | 51% | 36% |
| Rasmussen | February 16, 2006 | 52% | 36% |
| Muhlenberg College | March 2, 2006 | 49% | 37% |
| Mansfield University | March 7, 2006 | 45% | 31% |
| Rasmussen | March 14, 2006 | 48% | 38% |
| Rasmussen | March 29, 2006 | 50% | 41% |
| Quinnipiac | April 6, 2006 | 48% | 37% |
| Strategic Vision (R) | April 13, 2006 | 50% | 40% |
| Rasmussen | April 20, 2006 | 51% | 38% |
| Muhlenberg/Morning Call | April 26, 2006 | 46% | 38% |
| Keystone | May 4, 2006 | 47% | 41% |
| Strategic Vision (R) | May 10, 2006 | 49% | 41% |
| Quinnipiac | May 11, 2006 | 49% | 36% |
| Rasmussen | May 22, 2006 | 56% | 33% |
| American Research Group | May 25, 2006 | 54% | 41% |
| Strategic Vision (R) | June 15, 2006 | 49% | 40% |
| Rasmussen | June 19, 2006 | 52% | 37% |
| Quinnipiac | June 21, 2006 | 52% | 34% |
| Strategic Vision (R) | July 20, 2006 | 50% | 40% |
| Rasmussen | July 26, 2006 | 50% | 39% |
| Muhlenberg College | August 5, 2006 | 45% | 39% |
| Quinnipiac | August 15, 2006 | 47% | 40% |
| Benenson Strategy Group (D) | August 16, 2006 | 51% | 37% |
| Strategic Vision (R) | August 17, 2006 | 47% | 41% |
| Rasmussen | August 22, 2006 | 48% | 40% |
| Keystone | August 24, 2006 | 44% | 39% |
| USA Today/Gallup | August 27, 2006 | 56% | 38% |
| Keystone | September 18, 2006 | 45% | 38% |
| Princeton Research Associates | September 18, 2006 | 52% | 31% |
| Rasmussen | September 20, 2006 | 49% | 39% |
| Temple/Philadelphia Inquirer | September 24, 2006 | 49% | 39% |
| Quinnipiac | September 26, 2006 | 54% | 40% |
| Strategic Vision (R) | September 28, 2006 | 50% | 40% |
| Mason-Dixon/McClatchy-MSNBC | October 2, 2006 | 49% | 40% |
| Rasmussen | October 5, 2006 | 50% | 37% |
| Zogby International/Reuters | October 5, 2006 | 48% | 36% |
| Muhlenberg/Morning Call | October 8, 2006 | 46% | 41% |
| Rasmussen | October 16, 2006 | 55% | 43% |
| Democracy Corps | October 17, 2006 | 54% | 37% |
| Strategic Vision (R) | October 23, 2006 | 49% | 42% |
| West Chester University | October 27, 2006 | 50% | 39% |
| Rasmussen | October 28, 2006 | 55% | 42% |
| Temple/Philadelphia Inquirer | October 29, 2006 | 54% | 38% |
| Strategic Vision (R) | October 30, 2006 | 49% | 39% |
| Quinnipiac | November 1, 2006 | 52% | 42% |
| Keystone | November 1, 2006 | 53% | 38% |
| Reuters/Zogby International | November 2, 2006 | 48% | 40% |
| Muhlenberg/Morning Call | November 3, 2006 | 51% | 43% |
| Mason-Dixon/McClatchy-MSNBC | November 5, 2006 | 52% | 39% |
| Strategic Vision (R) | November 6, 2006 | 52% | 40% |

### Results

General election results :
| Party | Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% |
| | Democratic | Bob Casey Jr. | 2,392,984 | 58.64% | +13.2% |
| | Republican | Rick Santorum (incumbent) | 1,684,778 | 41.28% | −11.1% |
| | Write-in | Write-in | 3,281 | 0.08% | N/A |
| Total votes | Total votes | Total votes | 4,081,043 | 100.00% | N/A |
| | Democratic gain from Republican | Democratic gain from Republican | Democratic gain from Republican | Democratic gain from Republican | Democratic gain from Republican |
At 9:45 PM EST on Election Night, Santorum called Casey to concede defeat.

#### Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic

* Armstrong (Largest city: Kittanning)
* Cambria (largest municipality: Johnstown)
* Carbon (largest municipality: Lehighton)
* Clearfield (Largest township: DuBois)
* Mercer (largest municipality: Hermitage)
* Clinton (Largest city: Lock Haven)
* Columbia (Largest city: Bloomsburg)
* Elk (Largest city: St. Marys)
* Forest (Largest city: Marienville)
* Indiana (Largest city: Indiana)
* Schuylkill (Largest city: Pottsville)
* Somerset (largest city: Somerset)
* Warren (Largest city: Warren)
* Westmoreland (Largest township: Hempfield Township)
* Bucks (largest municipality: Bensalem)
* Berks (largest borough: Reading)
* Centre (largest municipality: State College)
* Chester (largest municipality: West Chester)
* Delaware (largest city: Upper Darby)
* Dauphin (largest municipality: Harrisburg)
* Erie (largest municipality: Erie)
* Luzerne (largest municipality: Wilkes-Barre)
* Lehigh (largest municipality: Allentown)
* Monroe (largest borough: Stroudsburg)
* Montgomery (largest city: Lower Merion)
* Northampton (largest municipality: Bethlehem)

#### By congressional district

Bob Casey Jr won 14 of 19 congressional districts, including four districts which elected Republicans to the House.
| District | Casey Jr. | Santorum | Representative |
| 1st | 87.7% | 12.3% | Bob Brady |
| 2nd | 89.6% | 10.4% |
| 2nd | 89.6% | 10.4% | Chaka Fattah |
| 3rd | 54.0% | 46.0% | Phil English |
| 4th | 54.9% | 45.1% | Melissa Hart (109th Congress) |
| 4th | 54.9% | 45.1% | Jason Altmire (110th Congress) |
| 5th | 49.9% | 50.1% | John E. Peterson |
| 6th | 58.5% | 41.5% | Jim Gerlach |
| 7th | 59.1% | 40.9% | Curt Weldon (109th Congress) |
| 7th | 59.1% | 40.9% | Joe Sestak (110th Congress) |
| 8th | 58.8% | 41.2% | Mike Fitzpatrick (109th Congress) |
| 8th | 58.8% | 41.2% | Patrick Murphy (110th Congress) |
| 9th | 44.9% | 55.1% | Bill Shuster |
| 10th | 49.1% | 50.9% | Don Sherwood (109th Congress) |
| 10th | 49.1% | 50.9% | Chris Carney (110th Congress) |
| 11th | 62.3% | 37.7% | Paul Kanjorski |
| 12th | 62.9% | 37.1% | John Murtha |
| 13th | 63.0% | 37.0% | Allyson Schwartz |
| 14th | 76.4% | 23.6% | Mike Doyle |
| 15th | 56.9% | 43.1% | Charlie Dent |
| 16th | 45.8% | 54.2% | Joe Pitts |
| 17th | 51.3% | 48.7% | Tim Holden |
| 18th | 55.2% | 44.8% | Tim Murphy |
| 19th | 45.6% | 54.4% | Todd R. Platts |