# Lattice energy

In chemistry, the lattice energy is the energy change upon formation of one mole of a crystalline ionic compound from its constituent ions, which are assumed to initially be in the gaseous state. It is a measure of the cohesive forces that bind ionic solids. The size of the lattice energy is connected to many other physical properties including solubility, hardness, and volatility. Since it generally cannot be measured directly, the lattice energy is usually deduced from experimental data via the Born–Haber cycle.

## Lattice energy and lattice enthalpy

The concept of lattice energy was originally applied to the formation of compounds with structures like rocksalt (NaCl) and sphalerite (ZnS) where the ions occupy high-symmetry crystal lattice sites. In the case of NaCl, lattice energy is the energy change of the reaction
    Na$^+$ (g) + Cl$^−$ (g) → NaCl (s)
which amounts to −786 kJ/mol.
Some chemistry textbooks as well as the widely used CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics define lattice energy with the opposite sign, i.e. as the energy required to convert the crystal into infinitely separated gaseous ions in vacuum, an endothermic process. Following this convention, the lattice energy of NaCl would be +786 kJ/mol. Both sign conventions are widely used.
The relationship between the lattice energy and the lattice enthalpy at pressure $P$ is given by the following equation:
    $\Delta U_{lattice}=\Delta H_{lattice}-P\Delta V_{m}$,
where $\Delta U_{lattice}$ is the lattice energy (i.e., the molar internal energy change), $\Delta H_{lattice}$ is the lattice enthalpy, and $\Delta V_{m}$ the change of molar volume due to the formation of the lattice. Since the molar volume of the solid is much smaller than that of the gases, $\Delta V_{m}<0$. The formation of a crystal lattice from ions in vacuum must lower the internal energy due to the net attractive forces involved, and so $\Delta U_{lattice}<0$. The $-P\Delta V_{m}$ term is positive but is relatively small at low pressures, and so the value of the lattice enthalpy is also negative (and exothermic).

## Theoretical treatments

The lattice energy of an ionic compound depends strongly upon the charges of the ions that comprise the solid, which must attract or repel one another via Coulomb's Law. More subtly, the relative and absolute sizes of the ions influence $\Delta H_{lattice}$. London dispersion forces also exist between ions and contribute to the lattice energy via polarization effects. For ionic compounds made of molecular cations and/or anions, there may also be ion-dipole and dipole-dipole interactions if either molecule has a molecular dipole moment. The theoretical treatments described below are focused on compounds made of atomic cations and anions, and neglect contributions to the internal energy of the lattice from thermalized lattice vibrations.

### Born–Landé equation

In 1918 Born and Landé proposed that the lattice energy could be derived from the electric potential of the ionic lattice and a repulsive potential energy term.
    $\Delta U_{lattice}=-{\frac {N_{A}Mz^{+}z^{-}e^{2}}{4\pi \varepsilon _{0}r_{0}}}\left(1-{\frac {1}{n}}\right),$
where
    N$_A$ is the Avogadro constant;
    M is the Madelung constant, relating to the geometry of the crystal;
    z$^+$ is the charge number of the cation;
    z$^−$ is the charge number of the anion;
    e is the elementary charge, equal to 1.6022×10$^{−19}$ C;
    ε$_0$ is the permittivity of free space, equal to 8.854×10$^{−12}$ C$^2$ J$^{−1}$ m$^{−1}$;
    r$_0$ is the nearest-neighbor distance between ions; and
    n is the Born exponent (a number between 5 and 12, determined experimentally by measuring the compressibility of the solid, or derived theoretically).
The Born–Landé equation above shows that the lattice energy of a compound depends principally on two factors:
* as the charges on the ions increase, the lattice energy increases (becomes more negative),
* when ions are closer together the lattice energy increases (becomes more negative)
Barium oxide (BaO), for instance, which has the NaCl structure and therefore the same Madelung constant, has a bond radius of 275 picometers and a lattice energy of −3054 kJ/mol, while sodium chloride (NaCl) has a bond radius of 283 picometers and a lattice energy of −786 kJ/mol. The bond radii are similar but the charge numbers are not, with BaO having charge numbers of (+2,−2) and NaCl having (+1,−1); the Born–Landé equation predicts that the difference in charge numbers is the principal reason for the large difference in lattice energies.
Closely related to this widely used formula is the Kapustinskii equation, which can be used as a simpler way of estimating lattice energies where high precision is not required.

### Effect of polarization

For certain ionic compounds, the calculation of the lattice energy requires the explicit inclusion of polarization effects. In these cases the polarization energy E$_{pol}$ associated with ions on polar lattice sites may be included in the Born–Haber cycle. As an example, one may consider the case of iron-pyrite FeS$_2$. It has been shown that neglect of polarization led to a 15% difference between theory and experiment in the case of FeS$_2$, whereas including it reduced the error to 2%.

## Representative lattice energies

The following table presents a list of lattice energies for some common compounds as well as their structure type.
| Compound | Experimental Lattice Energy | Structure type | Comment |
| LiF | −1030 kJ/mol | NaCl | difference vs. sodium chloride due to greater charge/radius for both cation and anion |
| NaCl | −786 kJ/mol | NaCl | reference compound for NaCl lattice |
| NaBr | −747 kJ/mol | NaCl | weaker lattice vs. NaCl |
| NaI | −704 kJ/mol | NaCl | weaker lattice vs. NaBr, soluble in acetone |
| CsCl | −657 kJ/mol | CsCl | reference compound for CsCl lattice |
| CsBr | −632 kJ/mol | CsCl | trend vs CsCl like NaCl vs. NaBr |
| CsI | −600 kJ/mol | CsCl | trend vs CsCl like NaCl vs. NaI |
| MgO | −3795 kJ/mol | NaCl | M$^{2+}$O$^{2-}$ materials have high lattice energies vs. M$^+$O$^−$. MgO is insoluble in all solvents |
| CaO | −3414 kJ/mol | NaCl | M$^{2+}$O$^{2-}$ materials have high lattice energies vs. M$^+$O$^−$. CaO is insoluble in all solvents |
| SrO | −3217 kJ/mol | NaCl | M$^{2+}$O$^{2-}$ materials have high lattice energies vs. M$^+$O$^−$. SrO is insoluble in all solvents |
| MgF$_2$ | −2922 kJ/mol | rutile | contrast with Mg$^{2+}$O$^{2-}$ |
| TiO$_2$ | −12150 kJ/mol | rutile | TiO$_2$ (rutile) and some other M$^{4+}$(O$^{2-}$)$_2$ compounds are refractory materials |