# Same-sex marriage in the Netherlands

Part of the LGBTQ rights series :
Legal status of same-sex unions :
Marriage
Andorra
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Denmark
Ecuador
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Malta
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Portugal
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Thailand
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Recognized
Israel
United States:
 • American Samoa :
Civil unions or registered partnerships but not marriage
Bolivia
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Hungary
Italy
Latvia
Monaco
Montenegro
San Marino
United Kingdom:
 • Bermuda
 • Cayman Islands :
Minimal recognition
Bulgaria
Cambodia
China
 • Hong Kong
India
Japan
Lithuania
Namibia
Nepal
Netherlands:
 • Sint Maarten
Poland
Romania
Slovakia :
See also
Same-sex union legislation
Same-sex union court cases
Timeline of same-sex marriage
Recognition of same-sex unions in Africa
Recognition of same-sex unions in Asia
Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe
Recognition of same-sex unions in the Americas
Recognition of same-sex unions in Oceania
Marriage privatization
Divorce of same-sex couples
Domestic partnership
Military policy
Adoption
Listings by country
LGBTQ rights by country or territory :
Notes
1 2 Performed in the Netherlands proper (including the Caribbean Netherlands), as well as in Aruba and Curaçao. May be registered in Sint Maarten in such cases, but the rights of marriage are not guaranteed.
↑ Neither performed nor recognized in Niue, Tokelau, or the Cook Islands.
↑ Neither performed nor recognized in six British Overseas Territories.
1 2 Neither performed nor recognized in some tribal nations of the US. Recognized but not performed in several other tribal nations and American Samoa.
↑ Registered foreign marriages confer all marriage rights in Israel. Domestic common-law marriages confer most rights of marriage. Domestic civil marriage recognized by some cities.
1 2 3 4 5 The Coman v. Romania ruling of the European Court of Justice obliges the state to provide residency rights for the foreign spouses of EU citizens. Some member states, including Romania, do not follow the ruling.
↑ A "declaration of family relationship" is available in several of Cambodia's communes which may be useful in matters such as housing, but is not legally binding.
↑ Guardianship agreements confer some limited legal benefits in China, including decisions about medical and personal care.
↑ Hong Kong provides inheritance, guardianship rights, and residency rights for foreign spouses of legal residents.
↑ Indian courts have recognised guru–shishya, nata pratha or maitri karar–type contractual relationships, but they are not legally binding.
↑ Most Japanese cities and prefectures issue partnership certificates, but they are not legally binding.
↑ Marriages conducted abroad between a Namibian national and a foreign spouse provide residency rights in Namibia.
↑ Romania provides hospital visitation rights through a "legal representative" status. :
LGBTQ portal :
vte :
Same-sex marriage has been legal in the Netherlands since 1 April 2001. A bill for the legalisation of same-sex marriage was passed in the House of Representatives by 109 votes to 33 on 12 September 2000 and by the Senate by 49 votes to 26 on 19 December 2000. The law received royal assent by Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands on 21 December 2000 and took effect on 1 April 2001. The Netherlands was the first country in the world to legalize same-sex marriage. Polling suggests that a significant majority of Dutch people support the legal recognition of same-sex marriage.
Same-sex marriage has been legal in Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, special municipalities of the Netherlands, since 10 October 2012, and in the constituent countries of Aruba and Curaçao since 12 July 2024. The other constituent country of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, Sint Maarten, does not perform or fully recognize same-sex marriages.

## Unregistered partnerships

Unregistered partnerships or informal cohabitation (samenwonen) occur when a same-sex or opposite-sex couple cohabits but chooses to keep the legal status of their relationship unregistered or informal. This means all worldwide assets that belong to a single party remain the sole property of the party with no legal entitlement by the other party, whether owned before or acquired during the relationship. The couple can record a contract (samenlevingscontract) with a notary to receive some limited financial benefits, including for tax and pension purposes. However, the benefits are limited, e.g. the father or non-biological mother is not automatically recognized as a parent after the birth of a child, and upon the death of one of the partners, the other partner is not considered an heir. This legal status of unregistered partnerships is respected by Dutch courts.
The Netherlands was one of the first countries in the world to recognise cohabiting same-sex couples by law. The first law recognising the cohabitation of same-sex couples was passed in 1979 for the purposes of rent law. Further legislation was passed in 1981 to recognise cohabiting couples for the purposes of inheritance tax.

## Registered partnerships

On 1 January 1998, registered partnerships (Dutch: geregistreerd partnerschap, pronounced) were introduced in Dutch law. The partnerships were meant for same-sex couples as an alternative to marriage, though they can also be entered into by opposite-sex couples, and in fact about one third of the registered partnerships between 1999 and 2001 were of opposite-sex couples. In law, registered partnerships and marriage convey the same rights and duties, especially after some laws were changed to remedy inequalities with respect to inheritance and some other issues.
Partnerships have become particularly common among Dutch couples, with about 18,000 new partnerships registered every year.

## Same-sex marriage
### Legislative action

As early as the mid 1980s, a group of gay rights activists, headed by Henk Krol – then editor-in-chief of the Gay Krant – asked the government to allow same-sex couples to marry. By 1995, about 100 municipalities had opened an alternative "marriage register", into which some 300 same-sex couples had inscribed. That year, the municipality of Rheden said that if government did not legalize same-sex marriage it would proceed with conducting same-sex weddings. Haarlem declared it would do the same or stop issuing marriage licenses altogether. The States General of the Netherlands decided in 1995 to create a special commission to investigate the possibility of recognizing same-sex marriages. At that time, the Christian Democratic Appeal was not part of the ruling coalition for the first time since the introduction of full democracy. The special commission finished its work in 1997 and concluded that civil marriage should be extended to include same-sex couples. After the 1998 general election, the Second Kok Cabinet promised to tackle the issue. In September 2000, the legislation was debated in the Dutch Parliament.
The marriage bill passed the House of Representatives by 109 votes to 33 on 12 September 2000.
12 September 2000 vote in the House of Representatives :
| Party | Voted for | Voted against | Absent (Did not vote) |
| G Labour Party | 41 Nebahat AlbayrakKhadija AribMarleen BarthJudith BelinfanteJet BussemakerFerd CroneMargreeth de BoerDick de CloeSharon DijksmaJeroen DijsselbloemDesirée DuijkersAdri DuivesteijnJaap Jelle FeenstraWouter GortzakMariëtte HamerWillem HerrebrughRik HindriksBert KoendersLucy KortramArie KuijperAd MelkertBert MiddelHillie MolenaarSaskia Noorman-den UylRob OudkerkPeter RehwinkelUsman SantiGerrit SchoenmakersJosé SmitsLaurette SpoelmanFrans TimmermansGerrit ValkAnnet van der HoekRob van GijzelPeter van HeemstJeltje van NieuwenhovenJan van ZijlHarm Evert WaalkensMarja WagenaarTineke Witteveen-HevingaMartin Zijlstra | 1 Thanasis Apostolou | 3 Ella KalsbeekWillie Swildens-RozendaalGerritjan van Oven |
| G People's Party for Freedom and Democracy | 36 Eric BalemansJan Dirk BlaauwStef BlokSam CherribiClemens CornieljeTon de SwartBibi de VriesHans DijkstalJan GelukEnric HessingPieter HofstraHenk KampJan Hendrik Klein MolekampRuud LuchtenveldEls MeijerAtzo NicolaïJacques NiedererGert-Jan OplaatFadime ÖrgüWim PasstoorsPatricia RemakJan RijpstraJanneke Snijder-HazelhoffJan te VeldhuisThijs UdoHans van BaalenWillibrord van BeekAnke van Blerck-WoerdmanTheo van den DoelMarijke van LenteNellie VerbugtOtto VosHella Voûte-DrosteFrans WeekersFrans WeisglasGeert Wilders | – | 2 Michiel PatijnErica Terpstra |
| Christian Democratic Appeal | 3 Nancy DankersGerda VerburgJoop Wijn | 24 Jan Peter BalkenendePieter Jan BiesheuvelAnk Bijleveld-SchoutenSiem BuijsHenk de HaanJaap de Hoop SchefferCamiel EurlingsHans HillenGerd LeersTheo MeijerAart MosterdJakob ReitsmaTheo RietkerkClémence Ross-van DorpAnnie Schreijer-PierikTheo StroekenAgnes van Ardenne-van der HoevenWim van de CampHans van den AkkerMaria van der HoevenCees van der KnaapPeter van WijmenMaxime VerhagenMarry Visser-van Doorn | 2 Joop AtsmaKlaasje Eisses-Timmerman |
| G Democrats 66 | 14 Marijke Augusteijn-EsserBert BakkerThom de GraafBoris DittrichFrancine GiskesJan HoekemaUrsie LambrechtsFrancisca RavesteinOlga Scheltema-de NieArthie SchimmelPieter ter VeerNicky van 't RietStefanie van VlietJan van Walsem | – | – |
| GroenLinks | 10 Femke HalsemaAb HarrewijnCorrie HermannFarah KarimiMohamed RabbaePaul RosenmöllerHugo van der SteenhovenIneke van GentKees VendrikMarijke Vos | – | 1 Tara Singh Varma |
| Socialist Party | 5 Jan de WitAgnes KantJan MarijnissenRemi PoppeHarry van Bommel | – | – |
| Christian Union | – | 5 André RouvoetGert SchutteDick StellingwerfLeen van DijkeEimert van Middelkoop | – |
| Reformed Political Party | – | 3 Koos van den BergKees van der StaaijBas van der Vlies | – |
| Total | 109 | 33 | 8 |
| Total | 72.7% | 22.0% | 5.3% |
The Senate approved the bill on 19 December 2000 by 49 to 26 votes. Only the Christian parties, which held 26 of the 75 seats at the time, voted against the bill. Although the Christian Democratic Appeal would form the next government, they did not indicate any intention to repeal the law.
19 December 2000 vote in the Senate :
| Party | Voted for | Voted against | Absent (Did not vote) |
| Christian Democratic Appeal | – | 20 Joeke BaardaMarie-Louise Bemelmans-VidecPeter BoorsmaGerrit BraksAlfons DölleHuib EversdijkHenk HofstedeWolter LemstraTineke Lodders-ElfferichJan PastoorWillem StevensYvonne Timmerman-BuckRob van de BeetenJannie van den Hul-OmtaRené van der LindenJos van GennipHannie van LeeuwenKobus WalsmaJos WernerHenk Woldring | – |
| G People's Party for Freedom and Democracy | 19 Fransje Roscam Abbing-BosFrits Korthals AltesPol de BeerCobi de Blécourt-MaasAd de JagerDick DeesHeleen DupuisLeendert GinjaarNiek KettingLiesbeth Kneppers-HeynertPaul LuijtenJaap RensemaUri RosenthalPaul SwenkerMarbeth Bierman-Beukema toe WaterNicoline van den Broek-Laman TripWim van EekelenJan van HeukelumMarius Varekamp | – | – |
| G Labour Party | 15 Geertje Lycklama à NijeholtFrits CastricumTon DoesburgRia JaarsmaErik JurgensFré le PooleMargriet MeindertsmaRuby RabbingeJohan StekelenburgIng Yoe TanElske ter VeldEd van ThijnWillem WitteveenDik WolfsonThijs Wöltgens | – | – |
| GroenLinks | 8 Wim de BoerDiana de WolffTom PitstraLeo PlatvoetCobi Schoondergang-HorikxJos van der LansBob van SchijndelAns Zwerver | – | – |
| G Democrats 66 | 4 Ruud HessingJacob KohnstammEddy SchuyerJan Terlouw | – | – |
| Christian Union | – | 4 Jurn de VriesEgbert SchuurmanCees van BruchemKars Veling | – |
| Socialist Party | 2 Bob RuersDriek van Vugt | – | – |
| Reformed Political Party | – | 2 Gerrit HoldijkGert van den Berg | – |
| Independent Senate Group | 1 Marten Bierman | – | – |
| Total | 49 | 26 | 0 |
| Total | 65.3% | 34.7% | 0.0% |
Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands gave her royal assent to the legislation on 21 December 2000. The main article of the law changed article 1:30 of the Civil Code to read as follows:
    Een huwelijk kan worden aangegaan door twee personen van verschillend of van gelijk geslacht.
    (A marriage can be entered into by two persons of different or the same sex)
The law came into effect on 1 April 2001, and on that day four same-sex couples were married by the Mayor of Amsterdam, Job Cohen, who became a registrar specifically to officiate at the weddings. A few months earlier, Mayor Cohen had been junior Minister of Justice of the Netherlands and was responsible for putting the new marriage and adoption laws through Parliament.
In Dutch, same-sex marriage is known as huwelijk tussen personen van gelijk geslacht or more commonly as homohuwelijk (pronounced).

### Requirements and rights

Dutch law requires that either partner have Dutch nationality or have residency in the Netherlands. The marriageable age in the Netherlands is 18. The law is only valid in the European territory of the Netherlands and on the Caribbean islands of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba, but does not apply to the other constituent countries of the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
The single legal difference between same-sex marriages and heterosexual marriages was that, in the former case, parentage by both partners was not automatic. The legal mother of a child is its biological mother (article 1:198 of the civil law) and the father is (in principle) the man she is married to or in a registered partnership with when the child is born. Moreover, the father must be a man (article 1:199). The other partner could thus become a legal mother only through adoption. Only in the case when a biological father did not become a parent (e.g. in case of artificial insemination by lesbian couples) would both female spouses obtain parental authority automatically (article 1:253sa). In December 2013, the Dutch Parliament changed this and allowed automatic parenthood for lesbian couples. The new law, which came into effect on 1 April 2014, allows the co-mother who is married to or in a registered partnership with the biological mother to be automatically recognized as a legal mother if the sperm donor was initially anonymous. In the case of a known donor, the biological mother decides whether the donor or the co-mother is the child's second legal parent.
On 6 April 2016, Minister of Foreign Affairs Bert Koenders and Minister of Security and Justice Ard van der Steur confirmed the Dutch position that, like other couples, same-sex couples who are not Dutch residents or nationals cannot marry in the country. The ministers argued that it might lead to "practical and legal problems" and could even be "dangerous" to some participants. The move came after the Liberal Democratic Party had asked the ministers to look into allowing non-resident foreigners to take advantage of the Netherlands' same-sex marriage law.

### Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten

Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten have separate civil codes from the Netherlands proper, and thus same-sex marriage was not automatically legalised in these constituent countries by the 2001 law. It only became possible to perform same-sex marriages in Aruba and Curaçao on 12 July 2024 in accordance with a Supreme Court ruling. This makes Sint Maarten the only constituent country where same-sex marriages cannot be performed, though Dutch marriages are recognized there to some degree.
On 12 July 2024, the Supreme Court of the Netherlands upheld a lower court ruling that the same-sex marriage bans in Aruba and Curaçao were discriminatory, effectively legalising same-sex marriages in those two constituent countries. Additionally, all territories of the Kingdom of the Netherlands register same-sex marriages performed in the Netherlands proper as a result of a Supreme Court ruling. In 2007, the Supreme Court ruled that all vital records recorded in the Kingdom of the Netherlands are valid throughout the Kingdom; this was based on its interpretation of the Charter for the Kingdom of the Netherlands. However, subsequent rulings have established that same-sex marriages are not automatically entitled to the same privileges (e.g. social security) extended to married couples of the opposite sex.
Aruba has also recognised registered partnerships offering several of the rights and benefits of marriage for same-sex and opposite-sex couples since September 2021. Curaçao and Sint Maarten do not perform registered partnerships.

### Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba

Same-sex marriage became legal in the Caribbean Netherlands—Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba—following the entry into force of a law enabling same-sex couples to marry on 10 October 2012.

### Opposition

In 2007, controversy arose when the new Fourth Balkenende Cabinet announced in its policy statement that officials who object to same-sex marriage on principle may refuse to marry such couples. Some Labour and GroenLinks dominated municipal councils opposed this policy, claiming that the job of a registrar is to marry all couples, not only opposite-sex couples. The opposition parties stated that if a registrar opposed same-sex marriages, they should not hold that post. The municipality of Amsterdam announced that they would not comply with this policy, and that registrars there would still be obliged to marry same-sex couples. In reaction to this, many other municipalities announced their rejection of this proposal as well. The cabinet claimed that this issue lay solely within the remit of the central government. In practice, municipalities could decide whether or not to hire registrars who object to marrying same-sex couples.
Before 2014, civil servants could refuse to marry same-sex couples as long as the municipality ensured that other civil servants were available to solemnize the marriage. In 2014, a law was passed that made it illegal for all marriage officiants to refuse their services to same-sex couples.

### Royal same-sex weddings

In October 2021, Prime Minister Mark Rutte confirmed that members of the Dutch royal family may enter into a same-sex marriage without having to forfeit the crown or lose their royal title and privileges or their place in the line of succession. Previously, the government had held that if an heir wanted to marry a partner of the same sex, they would have to forfeit their right to the throne.

### Impact

A 2021 study by economists Shuai Chen and Jan van Ours showed that from 2001 onwards levels of anxiety and depression fell drastically among individuals in same-sex relationships and largely converged to those of heterosexuals. Chen and van Ours found that the legalisation of same-sex marriage, as well as supportive societal attitudes, significantly improved the mental health of LGBT people. They concluded, "We find a significant improvement in the mental health of sexual minorities following the legislation. We also find that marriage itself was only partially responsible for the amelioration of mental health among sexual minorities. More importantly, the legal recognition of same-sex marriage improved mental health for both male and female sexual minorities irrespective of their own marital status."

### Statistics

According to provisional figures from Statistics Netherlands, for the first six months, same-sex marriages made up 3.6% of the total number of marriages: a peak of around 6% in the first month followed by around 3% in the remaining months, about 1,339 male couples and 1,075 female couples in total. By June 2004, more than 6,000 same-sex marriages had been performed in the Netherlands.
In March 2006, Statistics Netherlands released estimates on the number of same-sex marriages performed each year: 2,500 in 2001, 1,800 in 2002, 1,200 in 2004, and 1,100 in 2005. 14,813 same-sex marriages were performed in the Netherlands from 2001 to 2011; 7,522 between two women and 7,291 between two men. In the same period, there were 761,010 heterosexual marriages. There were also 1,078 same-sex divorces. By 2015, approximately 21,330 same-sex couples had married in the Netherlands; 11,195 female couples and 10,135 male couples.
On 1 April 2021, 20 years after same-sex marriage was legalized in the Netherlands, Statistics Netherlands reported that over 28,000 same-sex couples had married in the country by that time. Roughly 20,000 of these couples were still together; the remaining having divorced, moved abroad or one or both of the spouses died. Female couples were more likely to divorce, at around 26%, than heterosexual couples at 16%, and male couples at 14%.

### Religious performance

Since the mid-1960s, religious solemnizations of same-sex relationships have taken place in some Dutch churches. The Remonstrants were Europe's first Christian denomination to officially allow such solemnizations in 1986. The first Remonstrant church marriage for two men was performed at Vrijburg in Amsterdam on 31 January 1987. The Mennonite Church in the Netherlands also allows solemnizations of same-sex marriages, while the Old Catholic Church of the Netherlands has allowed its ministers to perform same-sex marriages in its places of worship since 2006.
The Protestant Church in the Netherlands, the largest Protestant denomination in the Netherlands, has allowed its congregations to perform same-sex marriages as "a union of love and faith before God" since 2004, and in practice many churches now conduct such ceremonies. The Protestant Church was formed in 2004 by the merger of three Calvinist and Lutheran churches. The Evangelich Lutheran Church, one of these three churches, officially stated in 1995 that "there are no theological arguments against blessing same-sex couples", and many Lutheran congregations performed blessings of same-sex unions. In March 1979, a priest of the Dutch Reformed Church performed a "special but public church service" in Groningen in which two men "express[ed] the profound significance of their relationship, promise[d] fidelity to each other, and pray[ed] for their friendship". Conservative Protestants protested the decision.
The Catholic Church opposes same-sex marriage and does not allow its priests to officiate at such marriages. In 1983, the union of two Protestant women, Harmanna Kalsbeek and Ria Bultena, was blessed at St. Joseph Cathedral in Groningen. While the blessing was meant to be secret, it was leaked to the media. The priest issued a public apology. In December 2023, the Holy See published Fiducia supplicans, a declaration allowing Catholic priests to bless couples who are not considered to be married according to church teaching, including the blessing of same-sex couples. Several bishops welcomed the declaration. The Bishops' Conference of the Netherlands also expressed its support, stating that the church is "a welcoming church which will not deny anyone the support and succour of God", but emphasised its views that marriage is "only possible between a man and a woman".

## Public opinion

According to an Ifop poll conducted in May 2013, 85% of Dutch people supported allowing same-sex couples to marry and adopt children.
The 2015 Eurobarometer found that 91% of the Dutch population thought same-sex marriage should be allowed throughout Europe, while 7% were opposed. A Pew Research Center poll, conducted between April and August 2017 and published in May 2018, showed that 86% of Dutch people supported same-sex marriage, 10% were opposed and 4% did not know or had refused to answer. When divided by religion, 95% of religiously unaffiliated people, 90% of non-practicing Christians and 60% of church-attending Christians supported same-sex marriage. Opposition was also 10% among 18–34-year-olds.
The 2019 Eurobarometer found that 92% of Dutch people thought same-sex marriage should be allowed throughout Europe, while 8% were opposed. A Pew Research Center poll conducted between February and May 2023 showed that 89% of Dutch people supported same-sex marriage, 10% were opposed and 1% did not know or had refused to answer. When divided by political affiliation, support was highest among those on the left of the political spectrum at 94%, followed by those at the center at 92% and those on the right at 85%. Women (92%) were also more likely to support same-sex marriage than men (86%). The 2023 Eurobarometer found that support had increased to 94%, while 5% were opposed. The survey also showed that 94% of Dutch people thought that "there is nothing wrong in a sexual relationship between two persons of the same sex", while 6% disagreed.