# Maukhari dynasty

The Maukhari dynasty was an Indian dynasty that ruled the Kingdom of Kannauj and controlled the vast plains of Ganga-Yamuna for over six generations from their capital at Kannauj. They earlier served as vassals of the Guptas. The Maukharis established their independence during the mid 6th century. The dynasty ruled over much of Uttar Pradesh and Magadha. Around 606, a large area of their empire was reconquered by the Later Guptas of Magadha. According to Xuanzang, the territory may have been lost to King Shashanka of the Gauda Kingdom, who declared independence c. 600.

## Religion

The Maukharis were orthodox Hindus. Hinduism received state support, but Buddhism also persisted as a prominent religion.

## Army

The Maukhari army consisted of elephants, cavalry and infantry. Ishanavarman in all probability would have taken much pains to reorganize the army and make it strong and worthy. The Maukhari strategy mainly focused on deploying elephant corps to crush the enemy armies. They were used against the Alchon Huns and the Later Gupta armies. The Maukharis fought against the remnants of the Alchon Huns in the areas of the Gangetic Doab and Magadha, as documented in the Aphsad inscription, while the Aulikaras repelled them in the Malwa region. The Aphsad inscription of Ādityasena mentions the military successes of kings of the Later Gupta dynasty against the Maukharis, themselves past victors of the Alchon Huns:
   "The son of that king (Kumaragupta) was the illustrious Dâmôdaragupta, by whom (his) enemies were slain, just like the demons by (the god) Dâmôdara. Breaking up the proudly stepping array of mighty elephants, belonging to the Maukhari, which had thrown aloft in battle the troops of the Hûnas (in order to trample them to death), he became unconscious (and expired in the fight)."
The Maukharis, rather than the Guptas, were therefore the key actors in repelling the Hunas.

## Administration

Kanyakubja, the Maukhari capital, grew in prosperity and importance as a great cosmopolitan city. After the demise of the Maukharis, it even became the capital of Emperor Harsha. Hence, Kanyakubja was largely contested by imperial powers.$^{:20}$
The first three Maukhari kings are mentioned in the inscriptions as Maharaja, but their successors assumed grander titles showing an increase in power and prestige. Ishanavarman was the first Maukhari ruler to adopt the title Maharajadhiraja (lit., King of Great Kings).

## Cultural and international exchanges

The Maukhari kings were patrons of poets and writers and many literary works were composed during their reign. Various seals and inscriptions are known, such as the Asirgarh seal inscription of Sharvavarman, or the Haraha inscription of Isanavarman, discovered near the village of Harara in the Barabanki district, Uttar Pradesh and dated to Vikrama Samvat 610 (ie 554 CE), which record the genealogy of the Maukharis.

### Contacts with the Sasanian Empire

With the end of Hunnic power, new contacts were established between India and the Sasanian Persia. Intellectual games such as chess and backgammon demonstrated and celebrated the diplomatic relationship between Khosrow I and a "great king of India." The vizier of the Indian king invented chess as a cheerful, playful challenge to emperor Khosrow. It seems that the Indian ruler who sent the game of chess to Khosrow was the Maukhari monarch Śarvavarman of Kannauj, between the beginning of Śarvavarman's reign in 560/565 and the end of Khosrow's reign in 579. When the game was sent to Iran it came with a letter which read: "As your name is the King of Kings, all your emperorship over us connotes that your wise men should be wiser than ours. Either you send us an explanation of this game of chess or send revenue and tribute us." Khosrow's grand vizier successfully solved the riddle and figured out how to play chess. In response the wise vizier created the game backgammon and sent it to the Indian court with the same message. The Indian king was not able to solve the riddle and was forced to pay tribute.

## Succession

The Vardhana dynasty (also called "Pushyabhuti dynasty") ultimately succeeded the Maukhari dynasty, but it had originally only been a small polity around their capital Sthaneshvara (Thanesar). According to Hans T. Bakker, their ruler Aditya-Vardhana (or Aditya-Sena) was probably a feudatory to the Maukhari ruler Sharvavarman. His successor Prabhakaravardhana may have also been a feudatory to the Maukhari king Avantivarman in his early days. Prabhakara's daughter Rajyashri married Avantivarman's son Grahavarman. As a result of this marriage, Prabhakara's political status increased significantly, and he assumed the imperial title Parama-bhattaraka Maharajadhiraja ("the one to whom the other kings bow because of his valour and affection").

## Rulers

The known Maukhari rulers of madhya-desha include:
* Harivarman
* Adityavarman
* Ishvaravarman (Iśvaravarman)
* Ishanavarman (Iśanavarman), r.c. 550–574 CE
* Sharvavarman (Śarvavarman), r. c. 574–586 CE
* Avantivarman
* Grahavarman, r. c. 600–605 CE

## Karenti branch of Maukhari Rulers

After the fall of Maukhari dynasty his descendants moved to Kuntalpur and later one of his descendant Kripal Dev moved to Kirtigadh in 661, where he defeated Baloch ruler of Kirtigadh and Makwanas ruled from (661 AD to 1089 AD). Last king was Kesar Dev Makwana, who died in battle against Hamir Soomra, ruler of Amarkot.
* 1. Kripaldevji or Karpaldevji, First Makwana Lord of Karenti (662-682).
* 2. Bharmal Second Makwana Lord of Karenti (682-706).
* 3. Bhojraj , Third Makwana Lord of Karenti (706-716).
* 4. Dhirsen , Fourth Makwana Lord of Karenti (716-734).
* 5. Popasen , Fifth Makwana Lord of Karenti (734-744).
* 6. Devraj , Sixth Makwana Lord of Karenti (744-762).
* 7. Parthisal , Seventh Makwana Lord of Karenti (762-792).
* 8. Salande , Eighth Makwana Lord of Karenti (792-810).
* 9. Surjanbhan , Ninth Makwana Lord of Karenti (810-824).
* 10. Somesar , Tenth Makwana Lord of Karenti (824-833).
* 11. Satal , Eleventh Makwana Lord of Karenti (833-862).
* 12. Sundarpal , Twelfth Makwana Lord of Karenti (862-891).
* 13. Ratanpal , Thirteenth Makwana Lord of Karenti (891-905).
* 14. Akhepal , Fourteenth Makwana Lord of Karenti (905-914).
* 15. Amratpal , Fifteenth Makwana Lord of Karenti (914-932).
* 16. Udebhan , Sixteenth Makwana Lord of Karenti (932-962).
* 17. Lakhdhir , Seventeenth Makwana Lord of Karenti (962-972).
* 18. Surtan , Eighteenth Makwana Lord of Karenti (972-992).
* 19. Hamir , Nineteenth Makwana Lord of Karenti (992-1022).
* 20. Narbhavandev or Narbhramdev, Twentieth Makwana Lord of Karenti (1022-1039).
* 21. Jayamalladev or Jaimalji, Twenty-First Makwana Lord of Karenti (1039-1042). Karenti (1039-
* 22.Vyaghradev or Vaghji, Twenty-Second Makwana Lord of Karanti (1042-1045).
* 23. Vihayasdev or Vairisha, Twenty-Third Makwana Lord of Karenti Karenti(1045-104
* 24. Kesardev, Twenty-Fourth Makwana Lord of Karenti (1049-28 MAY 1082). Died: killed in battle 28 May 1082 by Hamir Sumro, Jam of Sindh

## Barabar branch of Maukhari rulers

The Barabar Cave inscriptions attest the existence of another Maukhari branch. This branch ruled as feudatories, probably that of the Later Guptas. The known rulers of this branch include:
* Nrpa Shri Yajnavarman
* Nrpa Samantachudamani Shri Shardulavarman
* Anantavarman
* Lomas Rishi cave inscription of Anantavarman
* Gopika Cave Inscription of Anantavarman
* Vadathika Cave Inscription of Anantavarman
In some of the Barabar Caves inscriptions, the words referring to the Ajivikas appear to have been defaced, although the rest of the text appears intact. E. Hultzsch theorized that the defacement took place when the Maukhari ruler Ananta-varman installed Hindu images at the Caves. However, Basham dismisses this theory, noting that there is little evidence to support this view and the only cave in which the word Ajivikehi remains intact is among the three caves where Ananta-varman installed a Hindu image. According to Basham, since the defacement is selective, it must have taken place when the Brahmi script had still not been forgotten, likely some time before the 5th century CE.