# 2024 South Dakota Amendment G

Elections in South Dakota :
Federal government
Presidential elections
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Presidential primaries
Democratic
2004
2008
2016
2020
2024
Republican
2008
2016
2024
U.S. Senate elections
1889
1891
1894
1897
1901
1903
1903 sp
1907
1909
1913
1914
1918
1920
1924
1926
1930
1932
1936
1938
1938 sp
1942
1944
1948
1950
1954
1956
1960
1962
1966
1968
1972
1974
1978
1980
1984
1986
1990
1992
1996
1998
2002
2004
2008
2010
2014
2016
2020
2022
2026
U.S. House elections
1889
1890
1891
AL sp
1892
1894
1896
1898
1900
1902
1904
1906
1908
AL sp
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
1920
1922
1924
1926
1928
1930
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
1942
1944
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
AL sp
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024 :
State government
General elections
2010
2014
2018
2020
2022
Gubernatorial elections
1889
1890
1892
1894
1896
1898
1900
1902
1904
1906
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
1920
1922
1924
1926
1928
1930
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
1942
1944
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
Secretary of State elections
2022
Attorney General elections
2018
2022
Senate elections
2020
2022
House of Representatives elections
2020
2022 :
Ballot measures
2006
Amendment C
2008
Measure 9
Measure 10
2020
Amendment A
Measure 26
2024
Amendment E
Amendment G
Amendment H :
Sioux Falls
City elections
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
Mayoral elections
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022 :
Rapid City
City elections
2020
2022
2024
2026
Mayoral elections
2022 :
Pierre
City elections
2020
2022
2024
2026
Mayoral elections
2022 :
vte :
* This article is part of a series aboutKristi Noem
Early life
Early career
Electoral history
U.S. Representative from South Dakota
Tenure
Black Hills Cemetery Act
Elections
2010
2012
2014
2016
Governor of South Dakota
Tenure
Elections
2018
2022
Coronavirus response
2022 winter storm
2024 South Dakota Amendment G
U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security
Confirmation
Trump administration
Tenure
Mass deportations
Immigration policy
Personal life
Writings
No Going Back :
vte :
South Dakota Amendment G was a proposed constitutional amendment that appeared on the ballot on November 5, 2024. If passed, the amendment would have established a right to abortion in the Constitution of South Dakota up until approximately the beginning of the third trimester of pregnancy. The amendment failed to pass, making it the second referendum about abortion since Dobbs to come out as anti-abortion and preserve the state's ban.

## Text

That Article VI of the Constitution of the State of South Dakota be amended by adding a NEW SECTION:
   Before the end of the first trimester, the State may not regulate a pregnant woman's abortion decision and its effectuation, which must be left to the judgment of the pregnant woman.
   After the end of the first trimester and until the end of the second trimester, the State may regulate the pregnant woman's abortion decision and its effectuation only in ways that are reasonably related to the physical health of the pregnant woman.
   After the end of the second trimester, the State may regulate or prohibit abortion, except when abortion is necessary, in the medical judgment of the woman's physician, to preserve the life and health of the pregnant woman.

## Background
### South Dakota's abortion laws

In the 19th century, bans by state legislatures on abortion were about protecting the life of the mother given the number of deaths caused by abortions; state governments saw themselves as looking out for the lives of their citizens. South Dakota's first ban on abortion was passed in 1877. It read:
   “Every person who administers to any pregnant woman, or who prescribes for any such woman, or advises or procures any such woman to take any medicine, drug or substance, or uses or employs any instrument, or other means whatever with intent thereby to procure the miscarriage of such woman, unless the same is necessary to preserve her life, is punishable by imprisonment in the territorial prison not exceeding three years, or in a county jail not exceeding one year.”
By 1950, the state legislature had passed a law stating that a woman who had an abortion or actively sought to have an abortion, regardless of whether she went through with it, was guilty of a criminal offense. In 1972, the South Dakota Supreme Court unanimously upheld the constitutionality of the state's abortion ban in State v. Munson. Munson was overruled less than a year later due to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Roe v. Wade.
In 2005, the South Dakota Legislature enacted a trigger ban on abortion, which would ban abortion if Roe v. Wade was overturned. A year later, Governor Mike Rounds signed the Women's Health and Human Life Protection Act, a second total ban on abortion, into law. The law's ultimate goal was for the United States Supreme Court to overrule Roe. The act was ultimately repealed later that year through a ballot initiative led by Planned Parenthood.
In June 2022, Planned Parenthood announced it would no longer provide abortion services in the state due to the pending decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. This left the state with no abortion provider until the court's decision a week later. After the court's decision in Dobbs, the state's trigger ban went into effect immediately.

### Ballot measure submission

In 2022, Dakotans for Health, the group sponsoring the initiative, filed the amendment with Steve Barnett, the then-South Dakota Secretary of State. Barnett approved the measure for circulation on September 19, 2022. On May 1, 2024, the group submitted some 55,000 signatures, well over the 35,000 needed to gain ballot access. South Dakota Secretary of State Monae Johnson certified the petition on May 17, 2024.

## Campaign
### Comments by Governor Kristi Noem

   * Kristi Noem @KristiNoem
   .@realDonaldTrump is exactly right… this is about “precious babies.” It should be easier for moms, dads, and families to have babies — not harder. Different states will make different decisions on Life. What voters want in South Dakota might be different than what voters want in California. South Dakota is proud to stand for LIFE and support babies, moms, and families.
Before the organizers submitted the required signatures for the initiative, South Dakota's governor Kristi Noem had garnered controversy for her position on the state's abortion ban. In particular, her defense of the ban's lack of exceptions for rape and incest have been viewed as controversial. In response to a video Donald Trump made regarding his position that the states should decide on abortion access, Noem echoed this sentiment and remarked, "Different states will make different decisions on Life. What voters want in South Dakota might be different than what voters want in California. South Dakota is proud to stand for LIFE and support babies, moms, and families."
Shortly after this post, Noem reaffirmed this belief by saying, "The people will vote and they’ll decide what our state [abortion] law looks like...We get so much arguing and finger pointing. I’d rather that people just go out and have conversations. We, clearly, in the pro-life community, need to win people’s hearts and minds and that starts with loving people and helping mothers in crisis." Noem also recognized that she would not have the last say on abortion access in the state, acknowledging that she "doesn’t get to be a dictator" on the laws.

### Gestational limitation

South Dakota's current abortion law outlaws all abortions with few exceptions. The proposed amendment's language is based on the trimester framework originally in the 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade. At the time, fetal viability was generally regarded to occur around 28 weeks gestation. However, viability is now considered to be closer to around 23–24 weeks. Additionally, the trimester framework in Roe was overturned in 1992 in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. As a result, there have been questions and misinformation about the gestational limitations of Amendment G. Opponents of the amendment have falsely argued this would allow abortions until the moment of birth. Similarly, abortion rights groups have argued that the initiative does not go far enough in allowing abortion.

## Endorsements

Prominent Leaders
* Former Senate Majority Leader and Senator Tom Daschle (D-SD) (Democrat)
* Former Health and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala
* Jan Nicolai,former State Representative (1982–2000) and Chair of the House Appropriations Committee (1986–1996) (Republican)
* Rick Weiland, Official Sponsor of Amendment G
State Senators
* Stan Adelstein, Republican businessman, former State Senator and State Representative of South Dakota (Republican)
* Nancy Turbak-Berry, Democratic former State Senator and Judge (Democrat)
* Reynold Nesiba, Minority Leader of the South Dakota Senate (2023–present) and state senator from the 15th district (2017–present) (Democrat)
State Representatives
* Linda Duba, state representative from the 15th district (2019–present) (Democrat)
* Oren Lesmeister, Minority Leader of the South Dakota House of Representatives (2023–present) and state representative from the 28A district (2017–present) (Democrat)
* Casey Murschel, former State Representative District 12 (2001–2007) (Republican)
Organizations
* Dakotans for Health (initiative sponsor)
* Republicans for Freedom Amendment G Coalition
* South Dakota League of Women Voters
* Doctors for Freedom (group of physicians supporting Amendment G)
* Faith Leaders Freedom Coalition (group of Christian faith leaders from five denominations)
* Freedom From Religion Foundation
* South Dakota Advocacy Network for Women
Statewide officials
* Kristi Noem, 33rd Governor of South Dakota (2019–present) (Republican)
* Mike Rounds, U.S. Senator from South Dakota (Republican)
* John Thune, U.S. Senator from South Dakota (Republican)
State Representatives
* Jon Hansen, Vice President of South Dakota Right to Life, State Representative from the 25th district (2019–present) (Republican)
Individuals
* Leslee Unruh, anti-abortion activist and co-chair of Life Defense Fund
Organizations
* Planned Parenthood North Central States
* Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America
* Life Defense Fund
* American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
* South Dakota Right to Life (SDRTL)

## Polling

| Poll source | Date(s) administered | Sample size | Margin of error | Yes | No | Undecided |
| Emerson College/Nexstar Media | October 19–22, 2024 | 825 (LV) | ± 3.3% | 45% | 48% | 7% |
| Mason-Dixon Polling & Strategy | May 10–13, 2024 | 500 (RV) | ± 4.5% | 53% | 35% | 11% |
| Mason-Dixon Polling & Strategy | November 27–29, 2023 | 500 (RV) | ± 4.5% | 46% | 44% | 11% |

## Results

Amendment G :
| Choice | Votes | % |
| No | 250,136 | 58.59 |
| Yes | 176,809 | 41.41 |
| Total votes | 426,945 | 100.00 |
| Source: Secretary of State of South Dakota |||