# Proportional tax

Part of a series on :
Taxation :
An aspect of fiscal policy :
Policies
Government revenue
Property tax equalization
Tax revenue
Non-tax revenue
Tax law
Tax bracket
Flat tax
Tax threshold
Exemption
Credit
Deduction
Tax shift
Tax cut
Tax holiday
Tax amnesty
Tax advantage
Tax incentive
Tax reform
Tax harmonization
Tax competition
Tax withholding
Double taxation
Representation
Unions
Medical savings account :
Economics
General Theory
Price effect
Excess burden
Tax incidence
Laffer curve
Optimal tax
Theories
Optimal capital income taxation
Distribution of Tax
Tax rate
Flat
Progressive
Regressive
Proportional :
Collection
Revenue service
Revenue stamp
Tax assessment
Taxable income
Tax lien
Tax refund
Tax shield
Tax residence
Tax preparation
Tax investigation
Tax shelter
Tax collector
Private tax collection
Tax farming :
Noncompliance
General
Tax avoidance
Repatriation tax avoidance
Tax evasion
Tax resistance
Tax shelter
Debtors' prison
Smuggling
Black market
Unreported employment
Corporate
Tax inversion
Transfer mispricing
Base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS)
Double Irish
Dutch Sandwich
Single Malt
CAIA
Locations
Tax havens
Corporate havens
Offshore financial centres (OFCs)
Offshore magic circle
Conduit and sink OFCs
Financial centres
Financial Secrecy Index
Major examples
Ireland as a tax haven
Ireland v. Commission
Leprechaun economics
Liechtenstein tax affair
Luxembourg Leaks
Offshore Leaks
Paradise Papers
Panama Papers
Swiss Leaks
United States as a tax haven
Panama as a tax haven :
Types
Direct
Indirect
Per unit
Ad valorem
Aviation
Airport improvement
Landing
Solidarity
Capital gains
Expatriation
Consumption
Departure
Hotel
Sales
Stamp
Television
Tourist
Value-added
Dividend
Environmental tax
Carbon
Eco-tariff
Landfill
Natural resources consumption
Severance
Steering
Stumpage
Excise
Alcohol
Cigarette
Fat
Meat
Sin
Sugary drink
Tobacco
General
Georgist
Gift
Gross receipts
Hypothecated
Income
Inheritance (estate)
Land value
Luxury
Payroll
Pigouvian
Property
Resource rent
Single
Surtax
Turnover
Use
User charge/fee
Congestion
Fuel
Road/GNSS
Toll
Vehicle miles traveled
Corporate profit
Excess profits
Windfall
Negative (income)
Wealth :
International
Financial transaction tax
ATTAC
Currency transaction tax
European Union Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB)
Global minimum corporate tax rate
Robin Hood tax
Tobin tax
Spahn tax
Tax equalization
Tax treaty
Exchange of Information
Permanent establishment
Transfer pricing
European Union FTT
Foreign revenue rule :
Trade
Custom
Duty
Tariff
Import
Export
Tariff war
Free trade
Free-trade zone
Trade agreement
ATA Carnet :
Research
Academic
Mihir A. Desai
Dhammika Dharmapala
James R. Hines Jr.
Ronen Palan
Joel Slemrod
Gabriel Zucman
Advocacy groups
Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP)
Oxfam (UK)
Tax Foundation (US)
Tax Justice Network (TJN)
Tax Policy Center (US) :
Religious
Church tax
Eight per thousand
Teind
Tithe
Fiscus Judaicus
Leibzoll
Temple tax
Tolerance tax
Jizya
Kharaj
Khums
Nisab
Zakat :
By country
All Countries
List of countries by tax rates
Tax revenue to GDP ratio
Tax rates in Europe
Individual Countries
Albania
Algeria
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
Bhutan
Brazil
Bulgaria
BVI
Canada
China
Colombia
Croatia
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Kazakhstan
Lithuania
Malta
Morocco
Namibia
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Pakistan
Palestine
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Russia
South Africa
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Tanzania
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay :
Business portal
Money portal :
vte :
A proportional tax is a tax imposed so that the tax rate is fixed, with no change as the taxable base amount increases or decreases. The amount of the tax is in proportion to the amount subject to taxation. "Proportional" describes a distribution effect on income or expenditure, referring to the way the rate remains consistent (does not progress from "low to high" or "high to low" as income or consumption changes), where the marginal tax rate is equal to the average tax rate.
It can be applied to individual taxes or to a tax system as a whole; a year, multi-year, or lifetime. Proportional taxes maintain equal tax incidence regardless of the ability-to-pay and do not shift the incidence disproportionately to those with a higher or lower economic well-being.
Although a proportional tax is sometimes called a flat tax, flat taxes are in fact only one type of proportional tax that offer particular deductions. Therefore, they fall under the same category as proportional taxes. Flat taxes are defined as levying a fixed (“flat”) fraction of taxable income. A flat tax is a tax with a single rate on the taxable amount, after accounting for any deductions or exemptions from the tax base. It is not necessarily a fully-proportional tax. They usually exempt from taxation household income below a statutorily determined level that is a function of the type and size of the household. As a result, such a flat marginal rate is consistent with a progressive average tax rate.
A progressive tax is a tax in which the tax rate increases as the taxable base amount increases. The term “progressive” describes a distribution effect on income or expenditure, referring to the way the rate progresses from low to high, where the average tax rate is less than the marginal tax rate. The opposite of a progressive tax is a regressive tax, where the tax rate decreases as the amount subject to taxation increases. Because there is an inverse relationship between the tax rate and the taxpayer's ability to pay as determined by assets, consumption, or income, regressive taxes place a greater burden (relative to resources) on the poor than on the rich in terms of individual income and wealth.
The French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of 1789 proclaims:
   A common contribution is essential for the maintenance of the public forces and for the cost of administration. This should be equitably distributed among all the citizens in proportion to their means.

## Arguments for and against

Proponents of a proportionate tax system claim that since there is no tax penalty linked to higher salaries, people are encouraged to earn more. There is no concern about moving into a higher tax bracket when income rises because the tax rate stays the same. This stimulates investment and production, which supports economic growth and simplicity.
On the opposing hand, not everyone supports proportionate taxes. According to critics, low-wage workers are disproportionately affected as they wind up paying a larger percentage of their income in taxes. They contend that a progressive tax system is a more equitable solution, in which higher-income individuals pay a larger proportion of taxes. The fact that flat taxes have the potential to worsen income inequality is one of their main objections. Some nations that use proportional taxation to remedy this problem do so by introducing deductions and exemptions for low-income people, thereby making the system less regressive.
Progressive tax rates or marginal taxation, which is more common worldwide, is a tax structure in place in developed countries, where those with lower incomes pay a smaller share of taxes.

## Proportional rates

Proportional taxes on consumption are considered by some to be regressive; that is, low-income people tend to spend a greater percentage of their income in taxable sales (using a cross section timeframe) than higher income people. A regressive tax is when the average tax rate is lower, with higher income. So income and average tax rate have an inverse relationship. However, this calculation is derived when the tax paid is divided not by the tax base (the amount spent) but by income, which is argued to create an arbitrary relationship. The income tax rate itself is proportional, with people with higher incomes paying more tax but at the same rate.
If a consumption tax is to be related to income, the unspent income can be treated as tax-deferred (spending savings at a later point in time), at which time it is taxed creating a proportional rate using an income base.

## Examples

Proportional taxes are one of several types of taxes that governments can use to generate revenue. But these examples can be also considered regressive or progressive in different countries. They often exempt items or individuals from taxes to alleviate the burden on the poor.

### Income tax

* Eleven U.S. states impose a proportional income rate tax (also referred to as flat tax) for individuals. These states are as of 2023: Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Utah
* Estonia’s flat tax - Estonia employs a proportional tax rate on personal income, corporate income, and consumption. This system has garnered international attention for its simplicity. Individuals pay a flat rate of 20% on their income, which includes wages, business profits, and capital gains. Additionally, Estonia applies a 20% value-added tax (VAT) to most goods and services.
Several countries that have flat taxes include Greenland, which has one of the highest rates in the world (45%). However, Greenland is deficient in many social services when compared to many developed countries. Mongolia, Kazakhstan (10%), Bolivia (13%), as well as other countries, have comparable flat tax rates.

### Sales tax

Conventional or retail sales taxes are only charged to the end user of a good or service. Since all customers pay the same fixed rate of sales tax, regardless of their income, the tax is regarded as proportional. The sales tax rate is applied to both goods and services; the buyer's income is not taken into consideration. Most countries in the world have sales taxes at all or several of the national, state, county, or city government levels. However, consumption taxes such as a sales tax can often exclude items or provide rebates in an effort to create social justice. In many locations, "necessary" items such as non-prepared food, clothing, or prescription drugs are exempt from sales tax to alleviate the burden on the poor.

### Occupational tax

An occupational tax is a form of excise tax that is imposed upon persons or business entities for engaging in a profession, trade, or business. Some jurisdictions class business and occupation taxes according to sectors, such as wholesaling, services, retailing, or manufacturing. Within each sector, the tax rate is the same. However, it may vary among classes. Occupational taxes maintain a consistent rate for everyone in a specific occupation or industry, so they are considered proportional.

### Property tax

In a property tax system, taxes are imposed in proportion to each property's monetary value, which is determined by the government through appraisal or other means, so Property tax can be considered a proportinal tax in some cases. However property tax rates can vary in countries significantly based on factors such as the property’s location, value, and local regulations. Thats why property taxes are often considered regressive - they take a larger percentage of income from low-income earners.

### Historical examples

* Ancient Egypt
the pharaohs established a tax system that exemplified proportional taxation. Individuals contributed a percentage of their income to the government. These taxes were collected in the form of crops and livestock, which served as essential resources for feeding the army and funding public infrastructure projects1. This historical practice reflects an early instance of proportional taxation
* The Roman Empire
Taxation in ancient Rome demonstrated a proportional tax, where citizens were required to contribute 10% of their income to the government. The tithe was one significant element of this system, they were collected to fund essential endeavors, including maintaining the army and supporting public infrastructure projects like roads, aqueducts, and public buildings.