# Penal populism

Criminology and penology :
Theory
Anomie
Biosocial criminology
Broken windows
Collective efficacy
Crime analysis
Criminalization
Differential association
Deviance
Expressive function of law
Labeling theory
Psychopathy
Rational choice
Risk & actuarial criminology
Social control
Social learning
Strain
Subculture
Symbolic interactionism
Victimology
Secondary victimisation
Victim blaming
Victims' rights :
Types of crime
Against
Humanity
Person
State
Class
Blue-collar
White-collar
Cold case
Perfect
Corporate
Hate
International
Juvenile
Organized
Political
Public-order
State
State-corporate
Transnational
Victimless
War :
Methods
Comparative
Profiling
Ethnography
Uniform Crime Reports
Crime mapping
Crime prevention
Crime statistics
Positivist school
Qualitative
Quantitative
BJS
NIBRS :
Penology
Denunciation
Deterrence
Incapacitation
Trial
Prison
abolition
open
reform
Prisoner
Prisoner abuse
Prisoners' rights
Punishment
Rehabilitation
Recidivism
Justice in penology
Participatory
Restorative
Transformative
Retributive
Utilitarian
Solitary confinement :
Schools
Anarchist
Chicago
Classical
Conflict
Critical
Environmental
Feminist
Integrative
Italian
Law and order
Marxist
Neo-classical
Positivist
Postmodernist
Realism
Left
Right :
Subfields
American
Anthropological
Biosocial criminology
Conflict
Criminology
Culture
Cyber
Demography
Development
Environmental
Experimental
Organizational
Political
Public
Radical criminology :
Browse
Index
Journals
Organizations
People :
vte :
Penal populism is a media driven political process whereby politicians compete with each other to impose tougher prison sentences on offenders based on a perception that crime is out of control. It tends to manifest in the run up to elections when political parties put forward hard-line policies which they believe the public wants, rather than evidence-based policies based on their effectiveness at dealing with crime and associated social problems.

## Origins

The phrase was coined in 1993 by Anthony Bottoms, when he labeled it one of the four main influences on contemporary criminal justice. It is a process that ignores or minimizes the views of criminologists, justice professionals and penal experts, claiming instead to represent the views of “the people” about the need for tougher punishment for criminal offending.
It has been theorized that the rise of penal populism has brought an increase in the repressiveness of various nation's criminal laws, including that of the United Kingdom, Canada under Prime Minister Stephen Harper, and the United States during the War on Drugs. The resurgence of penal populism in the early 21st-century lead to streams of populism flowing deeper from penal fields into mainstream society. This shift from penal to political populism was precipitated by two interconnected factors: the impact of the Great Recession and the mass movement of peoples across the globe.
Scholars argue that the concept of penal populism may imply an implicit form of penal elitism, that is, the "belief that penal policymaking should not be subjected to public debate and that matters pertaining to crime control and punishment should be left to experts or specialists."