# Nested function

In computer programming, a nested function (or nested procedure or subroutine) is a named function that is defined within another, enclosing, block and is lexically scoped within the enclosing block – meaning it is only callable by name within the body of the enclosing block and can use identifiers declared in outer blocks, including outer functions. The enclosing block is typically, but not always, another function.
Programming language support for nested functions varies. With respect to structured programming languages, it is supported in some outdated languages such as ALGOL, Simula 67 and Pascal and in the commonly used JavaScript. It is commonly supported in dynamic and functional languages. However, it is not supported in some commonly used languages including standard C and C++.
Other programming technologies provide similar benefit. For example, a lambda function also allows for a function to be defined inside of a function (as well as elsewhere) and allows for similar data hiding and encapsulation. Notably, a lambda function has no name (is anonymous) and therefore cannot be called by name and has no visibility aspect.

## Attributes

The scope of a nested function is the block that contains it – be it a function block or block within a function body. It is not visible (cannot be called by name) outside its containing block.
A nested function can use identifiers (i.e. the name of functions, variables, types, classes) declared in any enclosing block, except when they are masked by inner declarations with the same names.
A nested function can be declared within a nested function, recursively, to form a deeply nested structure. A deeply nested function can access identifiers declared in all of its enclosing blocks, including enclosing functions.
Nested functions may in certain situations lead to the creation of a closure. If it is possible for the nested function to escape the enclosing function, for example if functions are first class objects and a nested function is passed to another function or returned from the enclosing function, then a closure is created and calls to this function can access the environment of the original function. The frame of the immediately enclosing function must continue to be alive until the last referencing closure dies and non-local automatic variables referenced in closures can therefore not be stack allocated in languages that allow the closure to persist beyond the lifetime of the enclosing block. This is known as the funarg problem and is a key reason why nested functions was not implemented in some simpler languages as it significantly complicates code generation and analysis, especially when functions are nested to various levels, sharing different parts of their environment.

## Value

The nested function technology allows a programmer to write source code that includes beneficial attributes such as information hiding, encapsulation and decomposition. The programmer can divide a task into subtasks which are only meaningful within the context of the task such that the subtask functions are hidden from callers that are not designed to use them.
Block scoping allows functions to share the state of enclosing blocks (including enclosing functions) without passing parameters or using global variables.

## Uses
### Helper

A nested function typically acts as a helper function or a recursive function.

### Control flow

Nested functions can be used for unstructured control flow, by using the return statement for general unstructured control flow. This can be used for finer-grained control than is possible with other built-in features of the language – for example, it can allow early termination of a for loop if break is not available, or early termination of a nested for loop if a multi-level break or exceptions are not available.

### Higher-order functions

In some languages, it is possible to create a nested function that accesses a set of parameters from the outer function, that is a closure, and have that function be the outer function's return value. Thus it is possible to return a function that is set to fulfill a certain task with little or no further parameters given to it, which can increase performance quite significantly.

## Examples
### Simple example

A simple example in Pascal:
The function F is nested within E. Note that E's parameter x is also visible in F (as F is a part of E) while both x and y are invisible outside E and F respectively.
Similarly, in Standard ML:
In Haskell:
In PL/I:
In Python:
In GNU C – which extends standard C with nested functions:

### Quicksort

The following is an implementation of quicksort:
The following is an implementation of the Hoare partition based quicksort using C++11 lambda expression syntax which is an alternative technology that also allows hiding a function inside a function:

## Languages

Notable languages supporting nested functions include:
* ALGOL-based languages such as ALGOL 68, Simula, Pascal, Modula-2, Modula-3, Oberon, PL/I, Seed7 and Ada
* Modern versions of Lisp (with lexical scope) such as Scheme, and Common Lisp
* ECMAScript (JavaScript and ActionScript)
* Dart
* Kotlin (local functions)
* Rust
* Scala (nested functions)
* Various degrees of support in scripting languages such as Ruby, Python, Lua, PHP and Perl
* GCC supports nested functions in C, as a language extension.
* C#, starting with C# 7.0
* The D language, a C-related language with nested functions.
* Fortran, starting with Fortran-90, supports a single level of nested (CONTAINed) subroutines and functions.
* MATLAB (full support)
* Wolfram Language
* Golang (Function closures)

### Functional languages

In most functional programming languages, such as Scheme, nested functions are a common way of implementing algorithms with loops in them. A simple (tail) recursive inner function is created, which behaves as the algorithm's main loop, while the outer function performs startup actions that only need to be done once. In more complex cases, a number of mutually recursive functions may be created as inner functions.

## Alternatives

Various alternative techniques can be used to achieve similar programming results as via nested functions.

### Modularity

A common alternative is to leverage a language's modularity technology. Some functions are exposed for use outside of the module and some are only visible within the module.
In C, this can be implemented by declaring functions and variables as static to hide them from code outside the file. This allows for data hiding, encapsulation and decomposition, but at a different level of granularity than with nested functions. This modularity does not support more than one level of nesting.
In object-oriented languages, a class typically provides a scope in which functions and state can be hidden from consumers of the class but accessible within the class. Some languages allow classes to be nested.

### Parameters

To implement data hiding, functions can pass around shared data as parameters, but this increases the complexity of function calls.
In C, this is generally implemented by passing a pointer to a structure containing the shared data.

### Lambda

In PHP and other languages, the lambda is an alternative. A function is defined in a code statement rather than declared with the usual function syntax. It has no name but is callable via a function reference. Such functions can be defined inside of a function as well as in other scopes. To use local variables in the anonymous function, use closure.

### Alternatives by language

The following languages provide features that are similar to nested functions:
* C++ – classes allow for similar data hiding and encapsulation; defining a class within a class provides similar structure (see Function object in C++)
* C++11 and later – via lambda expressions (see quicksort example above)
* Eiffel – explicitly disallows nesting of routines to keep the language simple; does allow the convention of using a special variable, Result, to denote the result of a (value-returning) function
* C# and Visual Basic – via lambda expressions
* Java – since Java 8, via lambda expressions, and in older versions, via an anonymous class containing a single method

## Implementation

Implementation of nested functions can be more involved than it may appear, as a reference to a nested function that references non-local variables creates a closure. For this reason nested functions are not supported in some languages such as C, C++ or Java as this makes compilers more difficult to implement. However, some compilers do support them, as a compiler specific extension. A well known example of this is the GNU C implementation of C which shares code with compilers for languages such as Pascal, Ada and Modula.

### Access of non-local objects

There are several ways to implement nested procedures in a lexically scoped language, but the classic way is as follows:
    Any non-local object, X, is reached via access-links in the activation frames on the machine stack. The caller, C, assists the called procedure, P, by pushing a direct link to the latest activation of P's immediate lexical encapsulation, (P), prior to the call itself. P may then quickly find the right activation for a certain X by following a fixed number (P.depth – X.depth) of links (normally a small number).
    The caller creates this direct link by (itself) following C.depth – P.depth + 1 older links, leading up to the latest activation of (P), and then temporarily bridging over these with a direct link to that activation; the link later disappears together with P, whereby the older links beneath it may come into use again.
    Note that P is visible for, and may therefore be called by, C if (P) = C / (C) / ((C)) / etc.
This original method is faster than it may seem, but it is nevertheless often optimized in practical modern compilers (using displays or similar techniques).
Another way to implement nested functions that is used by some compilers is to convert ("lift") nested functions into non-nested functions (where extra, hidden, parameters replace the access links) using a process known as lambda lifting during an intermediate stage in the compilation.

### Functions as values

In order for local functions with lexically scoped nonlocals to be passed as results, the language runtime code must also implicitly pass the environment (data) that the function sees inside its encapsulating function, so that it is reachable also when the current activation of the enclosing function no longer exists. This means that the environment must be stored in another memory area than (the subsequently reclaimed parts of) a chronologically based execution stack, which, in turn, implies some sort of freely dynamic memory allocation. Many older Algol based languages (or dialects thereof) does therefore not allow local functions that access nonlocals to be passed as return values, or do they not allow functions as return values at all, although passing of such functions as arguments may still be possible.

### No-execute stacks

GCC's implementation of nested functions causes a loss of no-execute stacks (NX stacks). This implementation calls nested functions through a jump instruction placed on the machine stack at runtime. This requires the stack to be executable. No-execute stacks and nested functions are therefore mutually exclusive in GCC. If a nested function is used in the development of a program, then the NX stack is silently lost, unless GCC is called with the ‑Wtrampoline option to alert of the condition. Software engineered using Secure Development Lifecycle often do not allow the use of nested functions in this particular compiler due to the loss of NX stacks.