# XVIII International Chopin Piano Competition

The XVIII International Chopin Piano Competition (Polish: XVIII Międzynarodowy Konkurs Pianistyczny im. Fryderyka Chopina) was held from 2 to 23 October 2021 in Warsaw. Originally scheduled for 2020, the quinquennial competition was twice postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
87 pianists from 18 countries took part in the main stage of the competition, which was divided into three stages with 87, 45 and 23 participants each, and a final with twelve pianists. The first prize was awarded to Bruce Liu of Canada.

## Background

The competition was originally scheduled to take place from 2 to 23 October 2020, with the preliminary round to be held from 17 to 28 April. In May 2020, the competition was postponed to the same dates in 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This was decided by Poland's Minister of Culture and National Heritage, Piotr Gliński, together with Artur Szklener, director of the Fryderyk Chopin Institute in Warsaw, after additional consultations with Poland's Ministry of Health. In January 2021, Szklener announced that the preliminary round would be postponed to July.

## Awards

The jury awarded eight main prizes to the finalists of the competition. The first prize went to Bruce Liu of Canada. The second prize was jointly awarded, ex aequo, to Alexander Gadjiev and Kyohei Sorita, while the third prize went to Martín García García. The fourth prize was shared, ex aequo, by Aimi Kobayashi and Jakub Kuszlik, the fifth prize was awarded to Leonora Armellini, and the sixth prize went to J J Jun Li Bui.
Artur Szklener, director of the Chopin Institute, announced that three pianists had identical scores, leading to very long debates among the jury. The winner of the competition, however, was unambiguously decided.
| Prize | Prize | Winner | Winner |
| | €40,000 | Bruce Liu | Canada |
| | €30,000 | Alexander Gadjiev | Italy Slovenia |
| | €30,000 | Kyohei Sorita | Japan |
| | €20,000 | Martín García García | Spain |
| 4th | €15,000 | Aimi Kobayashi | Japan |
| 4th | €15,000 | Jakub Kuszlik | Poland |
| 5th | €10,000 | Leonora Armellini | Italy |
| 6th | €7,000 | J J Jun Li Bui | Canada |
| F | €4,000 | Eva Gevorgyan | Russia Armenia |
| F | €4,000 | Hyuk Lee | South Korea |
| F | €4,000 | Kamil Pacholec | Poland |
| F | €4,000 | Hao Rao | China |
In addition, three of the four special prizes were awarded.
| Special prize | Special prize | Founder | Winner | Winner |
| Best Performance of a Concerto | €5,000 | Warsaw Philharmonic | Martín García García | Spain |
| Best Performance of Mazurkas | €5,000 | Polish Radio | Jakub Kuszlik | Poland |
| Best Performance of a Polonaise | €5,000 | Fryderyk Chopin Society | not awarded | not awarded |
| Best Performance of a Sonata | €10,000 | Krystian Zimerman | Alexander Gadjiev | Italy Slovenia |

## Preliminary stage

The preliminary stage was held from 12 to 23 July 2021 in the Chamber Hall of the National Philharmonic in Warsaw. Participants were required to perform the following works:
Preliminary stage program :
| One of Étude Op. 10, No. 1 Étude Op. 10, No. 4 Étude Op. 10, No. 5 Étude Op. 10, No. 8 Étude Op. 10, No. 12 Étude Op. 25, No. 11 | One of Étude Op. 10, No. 2 Étude Op. 10, No. 7 Étude Op. 10, No. 10 Étude Op. 10, No. 11 Étude Op. 25, No. 4 Étude Op. 25, No. 5 Étude Op. 25, No. 6 Étude Op. 25, No. 10 | One of Nocturnes, Op. 9, No. 3 Nocturnes, Op. 27, No. 1 or 2 Nocturnes, Op. 37, No. 2 Nocturnes, Op. 48, No. 1 or 2 Nocturnes, Op. 55, No. 2 Nocturnes, Op. 62, No. 1 or 2 Étude Op. 10, No. 3 Étude Op. 10, No. 6 Étude Op. 25, No. 7 | One of Ballade No. 1, Op. 23 Ballade No. 2, Op. 38 Ballade No. 3, Op. 47 Ballade No. 4, Op. 52 Barcarolle, Op. 60 Fantaisie, Op. 49 | Two Mazurkas from Mazurkas, Op. 17 Mazurkas, Op. 24 Mazurkas, Op. 30 Mazurkas, Op. 33 Mazurkas, Op. 41 Mazurkas, Op. 50 Mazurkas, Op. 56 Mazurkas, Op. 59 |
Ultimately, 151 contestants performed in the preliminary stage, of which the jury admitted 78 to the main stage. They were joined by an additional nine pianists, who qualified to the main stage directly by winning major piano competitions.
Competitors of the preliminary round :
| Competitor | Country | Result |
| Leonora Armellini | Italy | To Stage I |
| Anfisa Bobylova | Ukraine | |
| J J Jun Li Bui | Canada | To Stage I |
| Łukasz Byrdy | Poland | |
| Michelle Candotti | Italy | To Stage I |
| Luigi Carroccia | Italy | |
| Kai-Min Chang | Taiwan | To Stage I |
| Han Chen | Taiwan | |
| Junhui Chen | China | To Stage I |
| Xuehong Chen | China | To Stage I |
| Zixi Chen | China | To Stage I |
| Hyounglok Choi | South Korea | To Stage I |
| Martina Consonni | Italy | |
| Diana Cooper | France | |
| Federico Gad Crema | Italy | To Stage I |
| Aleksandra Hortensja Dąbek | Poland | To Stage I |
| Stephanie Draughon | United States | |
| Hsin-Yu Duan | Taiwan | |
| Mateusz Duda | Poland | |
| Alberto Ferro | Italy | To Stage I |
| Yasuko Furumi | Japan | To Stage I |
| Alexander Gadjiev | Italy Slovenia | To Stage I |
| Martín García García | Spain | To Stage I |
| Eva Gevorgyan | Russia Armenia | To Stage I |
| Jorge González Buajasan | Cuba | To Stage I |
| Joanna Goranko | Poland | To Stage I |
| Chelsea Guo | United States | To Stage I |
| Xu Guo | China | |
| Eric Guo | Canada | To Stage I |
| Katharina Hack | Germany | |
| Chi Ho Han | South Korea | |
| Saaya Hara | Japan | To Stage I |
| Yukino Hayashi | Japan | |
| Wataru Hisasue | Japan | |
| Yifan Hou | China | To Stage I |
| Wei-Ting Hsieh | Taiwan | To Stage I |
| Yun-Chih Hsu | Taiwan | |
| Kaoruko Igarashi | Japan | To Stage I |
| Hana Igawa | Japan | |
| Riko Imai | Japan | To Stage I |
| Grigoris Ioannou | Greece | |
| Seika Ishida | Japan | |
| Junichi Ito | Japan | To Stage I |
| Andrei Ivanou | Belarus | |
| Asaki Iwai | Japan | To Stage I |
| San Jittakarn | Thailand | To Stage I |
| Joo-Yeon Ka | South Korea | To Stage I |
| Yukino Kaihara | Japan | |
| Hyelee Kang | South Korea | |
| Hyelee Kang | South Korea | |
| Elizabeth Karaulova | Russia | |
| Airi Katada | Japan | |
| Eylam Keshet | Israel | |
| Konstantin Khachikyan | Russia | |
| Nikolay Khozyainov | Russia | To Stage I |
| Hyelim Kim | South Korea | |
| Jun Ho Kim | South Korea | |
| Su Yeon Kim | South Korea | To Stage I |
| Yurika Kimura | Japan | |
| Aimi Kobayashi | Japan | To Stage I |
| Qi Kong | China | |
| Pavle Krstic | Bulgaria | |
| Mateusz Krzyżowski | Poland | To Stage I |
| Yukine Kuroki | Japan | |
| Jakub Kuszlik | Poland | To Stage I |
| Shushi Kyomasu | Japan | To Stage I |
| Hyuk Lee | South Korea | To Stage I |
| Jaeyoon Lee | South Korea | To Stage I |
| Xinjie Li | China | |
| Ning Yuen Li | Hong Kong | |
| Xiaoxuan Li | China | To Stage I |
| Hao Wei Lin | Taiwan | |
| Bruce Liu | Canada | To Stage I |
| Ziyu Liu | China | |
| Julia Łozowska | Poland | To Stage I |
| Xuanyi Mao | China | To Stage I |
| Tomasz Marut | Poland | To Stage I |
| Yupeng Mei | China | To Stage I |
| Asaka Miyoshi | Japan | |
| Momoko Mizutani | Japan | |
| Arsenii Mun | Russia | To Stage I |
| Mayaka Nakagawa | Japan | |
| Yui Nakamura | Japan | |
| Việt Trung Nguyễn | Vietnam Poland | To Stage I |
| Mariko Nogami | Japan | |
| Arisa Onoda | Japan | |
| Georgijs Osokins | Latvia | To Stage I |
| Anke Pan | Germany | |
| Eryk Parchański | Poland | |
| Jinhyung Park | South Korea | To Stage I |
| Yeonmin Park | South Korea | To Stage I |
| Jiana Peng | China | To Stage I |
| Leonardo Pierdomenico | Italy | To Stage I |
| Zuzanna Pietrzak | Poland | To Stage I |
| Agnė Radzevičiūtė | Canada Lithuania | |
| Hao Rao | China | To Stage I |
| Yangyang Ruan | China | To Stage I |
| Kazuya Saito | Japan | |
| Cristian Sandrin | Romania | |
| Sohgo Sawada | Japan | To Stage I |
| Aristo Sham | Hong Kong | To Stage I |
| Meng-Sheng Shen | Taiwan | |
| Kotaro Shigemori | Japan | |
| Miyu Shindo | Japan | To Stage I |
| Mana Shoji | Japan | |
| Talon Smith | United States | To Stage I |
| Kyohei Sorita | Japan | To Stage I |
| Vitaly Starikov | Russia | |
| Szu-Yu Su | Taiwan | To Stage I |
| Hayato Sumino | Japan | To Stage I |
| Aleksandra Świgut | Poland | To Stage I |
| Marcel Tadokoro | France | |
| Rikono Takeda | Japan | To Stage I |
| Shunshun Tie | China | To Stage I |
| Mateusz Tomica | Poland | |
| Sarah Tuan | United States | To Stage I |
| Parker Van Ostrand | United States | |
| Mónika Ruth Vida | Hungary | |
| Chao Wang | China | To Stage I |
| Zitong Wang | China | To Stage I |
| Bocheng Wang | United Kingdom | |
| Chanel Wang | United States | |
| Yijia Wang | China | |
| Liya Wang | China | |
| Zijian Wei | China | To Stage I |
| Jacek Wendler | Poland | |
| Marcin Wieczorek | Poland | To Stage I |
| Andrzej Wierciński | Poland | To Stage I |
| Victoria Wong | Canada | To Stage I |
| Sze Yuen Wong | Hong Kong | |
| Maciej Wota | Poland | |
| Maiqi Wu | China | |
| Yuchong Wu | China | To Stage I |
| Lingfei (Stephan) Xie | China | To Stage I |
| Biguo Xing | China | |
| Zi Xu | China | To Stage I |
| Miki Yamagata | Japan | |
| Yuanfan Yang | United Kingdom | To Stage I |
| Anastasia Yasko | Russia | To Stage I |
| Suah Ye | South Korea | |
| Shih-Hsien Yeh | Taiwan | |
| Yi Yi | China | |
| Hao Zi Yoh | Malaysia | |
| Se-Hyeong Yoo | South Korea | |
| Jessica Yuma | Canada | |
| Andrey Zenin | Russia | To Stage I |
| Boao Zhang | China | To Stage I |
| Yilan Zhao | China | To Stage I |
| Kaiwen Zhao | China | |
| Ziji Zoé Zhao | China | To Stage I |
| Tianyu Zhou | Canada | |
An additional nine pianists qualified to the main stage directly by winning major piano competitions:
Competitors admitted directly into the main stage :
| Competitor | Country | Admission through |
| Piotr Alexewicz | Poland | 2020 Polish Fryderyk Chopin Piano Competition |
| Avery Gagliano | United States | 2020 National Chopin Piano Competition of the USA |
| Adam Kałduński | Poland | 2019 Beijing International Fryderyk Chopin Piano Competition for Young Pianists 2020 Polish Fryderyk Chopin Piano Competition |
| Szymon Nehring | Poland | 2017 Arthur Rubinstein International Piano Master Competition |
| Evren Ozel | United States | 2020 National Chopin Piano Competition of the USA |
| Kamil Pacholec | Poland | 2019 International Paderewski Piano Competition |
| Piotr Pawlak | Poland | 2017 Darmstadt International Chopin Piano Competition 2020 Polish Fryderyk Chopin Piano Competition |
| Yutong Sun | China | 2018 Santander International Piano Competition |
| Tomoharu Ushida | Japan | 2018 Hamamatsu International Piano Competition |

## Main stage

The main competition from 3 to 20 October consisted of three stages and a final. An inaugural concert was held on 2 October, and the prize-winners' concerts took place from 21 to 23 October.
Stage I was held from 3–7 October 2021 and was contested by 87 participants. Stage II was held from 9–12 October 2021 and was contested by 45 participants. Stage III was held from 14 to 16 October 2021 and was contested by 23 participants. The final was held from 18 to 20 October 2021 and was contested by twelve participants.
Calendar (CEST) :
| 3 Oct | 4 Oct | 5 Oct | 6 Oct | 7 Oct | 8 Oct | 9 Oct | 10 Oct | 11 Oct | 12 Oct | 13 Oct | 14 Oct | 15 Oct | 16 Oct | 17 Oct | 18 Oct | 19 Oct | 20 Oct |
| Stage I 10:00 (morning session) 17:00 (evening session) | Stage I 10:00 (morning session) 17:00 (evening session) | Stage I 10:00 (morning session) 17:00 (evening session) | Stage I 10:00 (morning session) 17:00 (evening session) | Stage I 10:00 (morning session) 17:00 (evening session) | | Stage II 10:00 (morning session) 17:00 (evening session) | Stage II 10:00 (morning session) 17:00 (evening session) | Stage II 10:00 (morning session) 17:00 (evening session) | Stage II 10:00 (morning session) 17:00 (evening session) | | Stage III 10:00 (morning session) 17:00 (evening session) | Stage III 10:00 (morning session) 17:00 (evening session) | Stage III 10:00 (morning session) 17:00 (evening session) | | Final 18:00 | Final 18:00 | Final 18:00 |

### Summary
#### Stage I

The first pianist to perform in Stage I was Xuanyi Mao of China. The letter "M" was drawn with a lottery machine by Piotr Gliński, the Polish Minister of Culture, at a press conference a week earlier.
Polish Radio commentators described Szymon Nehring's playing as "extremely mature", completely different than the previous competition, where he had been a finalist. Jed Distler from Gramophone noted that Georgijs Osokins' performance was "strikingly individual", with an "epic sense of time scale" akin to Emil Gilels. Japanese pianist Sohgo Sawada was called the best performer of the first day's evening session, possessing "disarmingly sincerity" in his performance of the Ballade in G minor. On the second day, the performance of Talon Smith of the United States was unanimously praised by the Polish Radio, and he was described as a "very musical pianist with a great imagination". Distler called Smith one of those youngsters who sound "wise beyond their years", approaching Chopin as "a master pianist with an old soul". On Day 3, commentators highlighted the "Italian dominance" of the day, with Leonora Armellini, who made the greatest impression, particularly in her performance of the Etude in C-sharp minor, and Michelle Candotti. Distler praised Armellini's "liquid sonority" and "flexible phrasing", in complete command of her chosen Fazioli piano. Italian-Slovenian pianist Alexander Gadjiev drew attention on the fourth day. Róża Światczyńska of the Polish Radio remarked: "He is coming here because he has something to say from himself, a very coherent vision of music, and he wants to pass it on to us regardless of how he is judged." Gadjiev's performance of the études was particularly praised. Distler described 17-year-old Yifan Hou as having "power, personality, style, technique, communicative immediacy and natural musicality", noting the "shocking" impact of his "compact, dramatic and kinetically fervent" performance of the first Ballade.
From the first stage, 45 pianists were admitted to the second stage, five more than originally prescribed in the competition format. Commentators remarked that some score differences were likely minimal and that it might have been too harsh to eliminate some participants.

#### Stage II

Compared to the first stage, where the program was largely fixed, participants were allowed a greater deal of freedom in the second stage, which has been described as more of a recital that tests the ability to arrange a program, and thereby the maturity of the pianist. The most praised participants of Day 6 were Kyohei Sorita of Japan, with a "well-structured program", and 17-year-old Hao Rao from China, who possessed "genuinely sincere emotionality". Yuchong Wu of China, who performed all waltzes of Op. 34, was described by Polish Radio commentators as the best performer of the first session of Day 7, and was particularly praised for his performance of the Waltz in A minor. For Distler, Tomoharu Ushida provided the day's "most pleasant surprise", giving a "masterclass in horizontal clarity and the spacing of notes in time". On Day 8, 17-year-old Russian-Armenian pianist Eva Gevorgyan roused interest, Andrzej Sułek from the Polish Radio remarking: "She is growing into a very important figure in this competition. I wonder if this is a pianist who is going for the first prize. A great success of the Chopin Competition is the arrival of an artist of such caliber." On Day 9, Polish Radio commentators highlighted Nikolay Khozyainov's "unusually well-thought-out and intricately constructed repertoire" that he managed to "realize on stage one hundred percent". The last pianist to perform that day was Bruce Liu of Canada, described to be among those "in the starting positions to attack the first place". Marcin Majchrowski of the Polish Radio remarked that he could not hide his emotions after Liu's performance, and that one could feel the "unimaginable tension and silence of listening to something special in the concert hall of the National Philharmonic".
After the second stage, 23 pianists qualified to the third stage, including six from Poland, five from Japan, three from Italy, two each from Canada, Russia, South Korea, and one each from the United States, China, and Spain. The number of participants admitted to the next stage again exceeded the number 20 originally prescribed in the competition format. Jury chairwoman Katarzyna Popowa-Zydroń stated in an interview that all jury members agreed that it was necessary to listen to a larger group of participants.

#### Stage III

In the third stage, pianists perform a complete set of mazurkas, a piano sonata (excluding the first) or the complete set of Preludes Op. 28, and any other compositions of Chopin to fill the remaining time. On Day 10, Polish Radio commentators highlighted the performance of Miyu Shindo from Japan. Sułek proclaimed her "some kind of Japanese priestess of the god of time", with the "fantastic ability to stop a chord from sounding or a phrase from closing, sounds vibrating, floating in the air like Debussy's, like a drop of watercolor in a glass of water". On Day 11, J J Jun Li Bui was praised for his performance of mazurkas and the Sonata in B minor, Światczyńska calling him a candidate for the Special Prize for the Best Performance of Mazurkas, which is awarded by the Polish Radio. In the evening session, Alexander Gadjiev's individualism was once again highlighted, some wondering why he came to the Chopin competition at all. Światczyńska remarked that he "is of a completely non-competitive type, not falling within the bounds of objective assessment", the question being whether his performance went "beyond the limits of good taste". At the end of the day, Majchrowski praised Eva Gevorgyan, calling her performance "one that will go down in competition history". On Day 12, Nikolay Khozyainov was called "one of the absolute favorites to win the competition", being described as a "mature, conscious pianist, intellectual pianist " with an "interestingly structured, coherent program". The third stage concluded with the performance of Canadian Bruce Liu, noted by Sułek as a pianist with "inexhaustible imagination", performing an "excellent recital".
From the third stage, twelve pianists from ten countries qualified for the final, two more than prescribed in the competition rules. Artur Szklener, director of the Chopin Institute, explained that "the substantive argument was that the participants ranked 10th, 11th and 12th very were close in terms of points. After checking the organizational possibilities with the National Philharmonic Orchestra, the jury came to the conclusion that the best solution would be to allow an increased number of 12 pianists." Sułek commented that the finalists constituted an "unprecented" mosaic of pianists, a "rich gallery of characters, pianistic individualities, among whom there are amazing phenomena". Światczyńska highlighted the "extremely different artistic personalities", noting that the jury's "range of tastes and criteria" was quite wide this year.

#### Final

The final was held over three days, four pianists presenting one of Chopin's two piano concertos on each day, accompanied by the Warsaw National Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Andrzej Boreyko.

##### Day 1

Kamil Pacholec of Poland was the first to perform. Sułek wondered about his experience with an orchestra, noting that Pacholec tended to follow the orchestra rather imposing certain musical thoughts on it. John Allison, writing for the competition daily Chopin Courier, praised Pacholec's "elegantly poised playing", yet noted that his performance "got weighted down", particularly in the slow movement. Distler called Pacholec's performance "steady" but "smaller-scaled" than his competitors.
Hao Rao of China was the second participant. Przemysław Psikuta of the Polish Radio noted that Rao, like Pacholec before him, seemed to play in a more classical, traditional way, "physical elements dominating over poetry". Allison noted that the middle movement was a particular highlight of Rao's performance, and that he projected it with "fully expressive, bel canto feeling". For Distler, the "effervescent and nimble" Rondo stood out the most.
Kyohei Sorita of Japan followed after an intermission. Majchrowski called his Romance "simply extraordinary", with nuances and an emphasis on the details of the score, and recognized him as the best performer of the day. Allison highlighted Sorita's "developed artistic personality" that secured him a "spacious performance" with "well-managed rubato". In Distler's view, Sorita demonstrated "an altogether higher level of pianistic cultivation" with his "variegated turns of phrase, subtle transitions and wider dynamic range".
Leonora Armellini of Italy concluded the first day. Sułek called her performance the best of the session, rating her a little higher than Sorita in terms of pianistic value. Allison called her performance "satisfying", writing that it felt like "being at a good concert", though noting that her Rondo was not the "most successful of the lot". Distler was captivated by Armellini's "warm and soaring tone, natural musicality, spontaneity and unalloyed joy in just being at the keyboard", noting that she "truly listened to her fellow musicians", though the Rondo's coda "didn't sparkle so brightly as expected".

##### Day 2

J J Jun Li Bui of Canada was the first to perform on the second day of the final. Sułek was disappointed by his performance, expecting an early Chopin-Warsaw style that defined his performance of the Rondo à la mazur in the previous stage. Sułek also highlighted Bui's apparent inexperience with an orchestra, and had the impression that Bui was focused on himself, not communicating well with the conductor and orchestra. Światczyńska praised Bui's "extremely poetic" moments in the Romance. Krzysztof Stefański, writing for the Chopin Courier, found praise for Bui's "warm, round tone" and "impressionist hues above the clarity of his arpeggio". Distler criticized Bui's playing as being too "uniform, machine-like", "ploughing through Chopin's bravura writing like the proverbial horse with blinders".
Alexander Gadjiev of Italy and Slovenia was the first to play the Piano Concerto in F minor. Światczyńska liked his sound and his "ability to operate within wide planes", but criticized his "manneristic pathos and affectation" that "contradict Chopin's expression". Sułek noted that Gadjiev's "wild nature" worked better in solo works, whereas in the concerto it caused the "narrative to become too fragmented". Stefański found that Gadjiev "played with a large sound, as if echoing the pianist's Romantic individualism". Distler found praise for Gadjiev's performance: "He illuminated the opening Maestoso movement's salient points by executing decorative passages in tempo, while demarcating melodies with discreet rubato and sophisticated accentuation. Gadjiev's seamless legato and multi-leveled dynamic control transformed the Larghetto into an aria where the piano's hammers seemed to have replaced by lungs."
Martín García García of Spain followed with the same concerto. Światczyńska was initially concerned with García's fearful appearance, but thought that he surprised many people with a good performance having "beautiful moments". Stefański described García's playing as "bathed in a gentle morning light", continuously displaying "Chopin's sunny side", playing "lightly, with an incredible songfulness and cultured tone". Distler remarked that García' seemed "held back on a leash" compared to his "impetuous, risk-taking solo performances" in the earlier stages of the competition, calling it "lovely by any standard" but with too little adventurousness to rival Gadjiev's "penetrating interpretation". In contrast, three of five music critics for the Polish music magazine Ruch Muzyczny called García's the best concerto performer: Szymon Atys called him his favorite pianist of the competition, Anna Chęćka highlighted his "surprisingly fresh and seductive vision" of the concerto, and Dariusz Marciniszyn remarked that García "enchanted" him completely, bringing forth "hidden melodic and harmonic dependencies" in the Rondo.
Eva Gevorgyan of Russia and Armenia concluded the session. Sułek noted that she "delighted" him, but did not "seduce" him until the second part. Stefański praised her "clear sense of direction", with each broken chord serving "a higher structural goal". For Distler, Gevorgyan was a "performance of eloquence, nobility and substance", evoking memories of "notable Russian luminaries like Emil Gilels and Bella Davidovich".

##### Day 3

Aimi Kobayashi of Japan opened the final day of the competition. Światczyńska remarked that Kobayashi did not seem to have the best day, wondering if the level expectations were becoming psychologically difficult to bear. Allison highlighted the delicacy and intimacy of her performance, though noting that her tempos might not endear her to critics. Distler highlighted Kobayashi's "micro-management and tense finger-orientated pianism". Two of five authors of Ruch Muzyczny called Kobayashi the best performer of a concerto. Marcin Bogucki praised her "romantic vision", though noting a few slip-ups in the finale. Krzysztof Stefański remarked that "time stopped for a moment. Her fingers flew lightly over the keyboard, even when she was building the climaxes, she did not reach for a strong forte. The lunar fragment of Romanza sounded like a wonderful improvisation. It was hard not to fall in love."
Jakub Kuszlik of Poland gave a performance that was assessed by Polish Radio commentators as another "step up". Światczyńska admired his composure and ability to focus, though feeling a certain lack of "poetic expression and color differentiation" Allison called his performance "straightforward", with "impressively fleet passage work", but also noting that he went "under the surface, into the realms of that uniquely Polish spirit of żal". Distler praised Kuszlik's "red-blooded, forward-moving" performance.
Hyuk Lee of South Korea brought the day's only performance of the Concerto in F minor. Allison criticized Lee's tone as being "too brittle", noting that he sounded "less than completely at ease". Stefański wrote that Lee seemed to reject the "romantic character" of the middle Larghetto, though playing the recitative fragments poignantly.
Bruce Liu of Canada was the final performer. Allison praised Liu's performance for "holding poetry and virtuosity in wonderful balance", the "dreaminess of the Romance" sustaining "right to the dying last note". Distler called his performance "effortless, insouciant yet relatively straightforward". Stefański called Liu the "undisputed favorite of critics and the audience", remarking: "He is a complete pianist – he has excellent technique, and he uses it to conjure up the most fascinating timbres on the Fazioli piano. You can write about his perfect brillante, his ability to produce a soft sound without the sustain pedal, his wonderfully rocking rubato, his great control of the dynamics, but also his ability to create form, as in the ever-increasing passages that end the first movement. And sometimes the pianist played in such a way that the critic's pen stood still – helpless, unable to find the right words for what he was hearing."

### Program

Participants were required to select a different program for each stage of the competition. The competition repertoire had to be played from memory and could be performed in any order. Contestants were not allowed to play the same piece again in different stages of the competition, though they could perform pieces they performed in the preliminary round (except the first two etudes) in the main stage. Participants could use any available edition of Chopin's works, though they were recommended to use the Chopin National Edition.
Competition program :
| Stage I program ||||
| One of Étude Op. 10, No. 1 Étude Op. 10, No. 4 Étude Op. 10, No. 5 Étude Op. 10, No. 8 Étude Op. 10, No. 12 Étude Op. 25, No. 11 | One of Étude Op. 10, No. 2 Étude Op. 10, No. 7 Étude Op. 10, No. 10 Étude Op. 10, No. 11 Étude Op. 25, No. 4 Étude Op. 25, No. 5 Étude Op. 25, No. 6 Étude Op. 25, No. 10 | One of Nocturnes, Op. 9, No. 3 Nocturnes, Op. 27, No. 1 or 2 Nocturnes, Op. 37, No. 2 Nocturnes, Op. 48, No. 1 or 2 Nocturnes, Op. 55, No. 2 Nocturnes, Op. 62, No. 1 or 2 Étude Op. 10, No. 3 Étude Op. 10, No. 6 Étude Op. 25, No. 7 | One of Ballade No. 1, Op. 23 Ballade No. 2, Op. 38 Ballade No. 3, Op. 47 Ballade No. 4, Op. 52 Barcarolle, Op. 60 Fantaisie, Op. 49 Scherzo No. 1, Op. 20 Scherzo No. 2, Op. 31 Scherzo No. 3, Op. 39 Scherzo No. 4, Op. 54 |
| Stage II program ||||
| One of Ballade No. 1, Op. 23 Ballade No. 2, Op. 38 Ballade No. 3, Op. 47 Ballade No. 4, Op. 52 Barcarolle, Op. 60 Fantaisie, Op. 49 Scherzo No. 1, Op. 20 Scherzo No. 2, Op. 31 Scherzo No. 3, Op. 39 Scherzo No. 4, Op. 54 Polonaise-Fantaisie, Op. 61 | One of Grande valse brillante, Op. 18 Waltzes, Op. 34, No. 1 or 3 Waltz, Op. 42 Waltz, Op. 64, No. 3 | One of Andante spianato et grande polonaise brillante, Op. 22 Polonaise, Op. 44 Polonaise, Op. 53 Polonaises, Op. 26 (both) | Any other pieces by Chopin to meet the required performing time of 30 to 40 minutes |
| Stage III program ||||
| One of Piano Sonata No. 2, Op. 35 Piano Sonata No. 3, Op. 58 Preludes, Op. 28 (all) | One of Piano Sonata No. 2, Op. 35 Piano Sonata No. 3, Op. 58 Preludes, Op. 28 (all) | Full set of Mazurkas, Op. 17 Mazurkas, Op. 24 Mazurkas, Op. 30 Mazurkas, Op. 33 Mazurkas, Op. 41 Mazurkas, Op. 50 Mazurkas, Op. 56 Mazurkas, Op. 59 | Any other pieces by Chopin to meet the required performing time of 45 to 55 minutes |
| Final program ||||
| Piano Concerto No. 1, Op. 11 or Piano Concerto No. 2, Op. 21 ||||
In the first stage, pianists most often chose the Étude in G-sharp minor, Op. 25 No. 6, the Ballade No. 4 in F minor (18 pianists each), as well as the Étude in C major, Op. 10 No. 1, and the Nocturne in B major, Op. 62 No. 1 (17 pianists each). No participant at this stage chose the Nocturne in G major, Op. 37 No. 2.
In the second stage, the most played pieces were the Andante spianato et grande polonaise brillante (18 pianists), the Waltz in F major, Op. 34 No. 3 (16 pianists), as well as the Barcarolle in F-sharp major and the Polonaise in A-flat major, Op. 53 (15 pianists each). Scherzo No. 4 was played by only one pianist (Hyounglok Choi), as were the Polonaises, Op. 26 (Federico Gad Crema). From additional pieces supplementing the repertoire program of this stage, pianists most frequently chose the Rondo à la mazur (5 pianists), the Waltz in A minor, Op. 34 No. 2, and the Nocturne in C minor, Op. 48 No. 1 (3 pianists).
In the third stage, most participants selected the Piano Sonata No. 3 (12 pianists), Piano Sonata No. 2 (8 pianists), and the Mazurkas Op. 24 and Mazurkas Op. 56 (5 pianists each). Of the additional pieces supplementing the repertoire program of this stage, the pianists most frequently chose the Fantaisie in F minor and the Polonaise-Fantaisie (3 pianists each).
In the finale, nine pianists decided to perform the Piano Concerto No. 1, and three chose the Piano Concerto No. 2.

### Piano selection

Before the start of the competition, each participant was allotted a timeslot of 15 minutes to choose an instrument. Participants could choose between a Yamaha, a Kawai, a Fazioli and two Steinway pianos. Once selected, participants may not change pianos between the rounds. Out of 87 participants of the first round, 43 chose the Steinway ending with serial number 479, 21 the Steinway ending with number 300, nine the Yamaha, eight the Fazioli and six the Kawai.
| Brand | Brand | Model | Serial number |
| S$^1$ | Steinway & Sons | D-274 | 611479 |
| S$^2$ | Steinway & Sons | D-274 | 612300 |
| Y | Yamaha | CFX | 6524400 |
| F | Fazioli | F278 | 2782230 |
| K | Kawai | Shigeru EX | 2718001 |

## Results

Yes: percentage of jurors who voted to pass the participant to the next round, excluding recusals
Pts: adjusted average number of points, excluding recusals
Scorings were released after the end of the competition, excluding those from the final.
Competitor results :
| Competitor | Country | P | Stage I | Stage I | Stage I | Stage II | Stage II | Stage II | Stage III | Stage III | Stage III | Final |
| Competitor | Country | P | Yes | Pts | →II | Yes | Pts | →III | Yes | Pts | →F | Result |
| Bruce Liu | Canada | F | 100% | 23.00 | | 100% | 23.03 | | 100% | 23.22 | | 1 |
| Alexander Gadjiev | Italy Slovenia | K | 94% | 22.66 | | 76% | 21.41 | | 88% | 21.75 | | 2 |
| Kyohei Sorita | Japan | S$^1$ | 80% | 20.40 | | 88% | 21.50 | | 80% | 21.57 | | 2 |
| Martín García García | Spain | F | 56% | 19.91 | | 76% | 20.14 | | 69% | 21.09 | | 3 |
| Jakub Kuszlik | Poland | S$^1$ | 100% | 21.67 | | 88% | 21.20 | | 93% | 22.00 | | 4th |
| Aimi Kobayashi | Japan | S$^1$ | 94% | 21.43 | | 88% | 20.47 | | 81% | 22.36 | | 4th |
| Leonora Armellini | Italy | F | 88% | 21.05 | | 71% | 20.60 | | 56% | 20.55 | | 5th |
| J J Jun Li Bui | Canada | K | 100% | 21.49 | | 100% | 22.91 | | 67% | 21.31 | | 6th |
| Eva Gevorgyan | Russia Armenia | S$^1$ | 100% | 21.66 | | 76% | 20.04 | | 88% | 21.40 | | |
| Kamil Pacholec | Poland | S$^1$ | 86% | 19.92 | | 67% | 20.04 | | 64% | 20.43 | | |
| Hao Rao | China | S$^1$ | 94% | 21.69 | | 65% | 20.28 | | 56% | 20.22 | | |
| Hyuk Lee | South Korea | K | 67% | 19.48 | | 69% | 19.91 | | 53% | 20.20 | | |
| Su Yeon Kim | South Korea | S$^1$ | 88% | 20.44 | | 47% | 19.82 | | 50% | 19.73 | | |
| Piotr Alexewicz | Poland | S$^1$ | 100% | 20.69 | | 76% | 20.74 | | 44% | 20.22 | | |
| Miyu Shindo | Japan | S$^1$ | 75% | 19.98 | | 65% | 19.72 | | 44% | 20.15 | | |
| Nikolay Khozyainov* | Russia | S$^2$ | 75% | 19.34 | | 76% | 20.08 | | 38% | 19.57 | | |
| Szymon Nehring | Poland | S$^1$ | 100% | 20.33 | | 94% | 21.47 | | 33% | 20.09 | | |
| Michelle Candotti | Italy | S$^1$ | 73% | 19.24 | | 94% | 20.37 | | 20% | 19.22 | | |
| Hayato Sumino | Japan | S$^2$ | 63% | 19.75 | | 59% | 20.30 | | 19% | 19.07 | | |
| Avery Gagliano | United States | S$^2$ | 75% | 19.33 | | 71% | 19.60 | | 19% | 19.06 | | |
| Andrzej Wierciński | Poland | S$^2$ | 67% | 19.48 | | 50% | 19.50 | | 13% | 19.35 | | |
| Yasuko Furumi | Japan | S$^1$ | 80% | 19.57 | | 56% | 19.21 | | 7% | 19.21 | | |
| Mateusz Krzyżowski | Poland | S$^1$ | 69% | 19.47 | | 53% | 19.25 | | 0% | 18.84 | | |
| Xuehong Chen | China | S$^1$ | 93% | 20.87 | | 44% | 18.84 | | | | | |
| Yuchong Wu | China | S$^2$ | 81% | 21.06 | | 41% | 19.66 | | | | | |
| Alberto Ferro | Italy | S$^2$ | 63% | 18.80 | | 41% | 19.00 | | | | | |
| Evren Ozel | United States | S$^1$ | 56% | 18.80 | | 41% | 18.76 | | | | | |
| Yutong Sun | China | S$^1$ | 80% | 19.44 | | 38% | 19.31 | | | | | |
| Shushi Kyomasu | Japan | Y | 63% | 19.63 | | 35% | 18.70 | | | | | |
| Tomoharu Ushida | Japan | Y | 56% | 19.40 | | 35% | 18.33 | | | | | |
| Việt Trung Nguyễn | Vietnam | S$^1$ | 71% | 19.57 | | 33% | 18.55 | | | | | |
| Kai-Min Chang | Taiwan | S$^2$ | 80% | 19.64 | | 31% | 18.73 | | | | | |
| Talon Smith | United States | S$^2$ | 67% | 19.07 | | 31% | 18.38 | | | | | |
| Georgijs Osokins | Latvia | Y | 75% | 19.56 | | 29% | 18.42 | | | | | |
| Wei-Ting Hsieh | Taiwan | S$^1$ | 56% | 18.78 | | 24% | 18.48 | | | | | |
| Adam Kałduński | Poland | S$^1$ | 93% | 20.13 | | 19% | 18.27 | | | | | |
| Hyounglok Choi | South Korea | S$^1$ | 69% | 18.84 | | 18% | 18.14 | | | | | |
| Lingfei (Stephan) Xie | China | S$^2$ | 87% | 19.45 | | 18% | 17.77 | | | | | |
| Sohgo Sawada | Japan | K | 56% | 18.48 | | 18% | 17.76 | | | | | |
| Zi Xu | China | S$^1$ | 79% | 20.62 | | 13% | 17.99 | | | | | |
| Federico Gad Crema | Italy | F | 63% | 18.95 | | 12% | 17.58 | | | | | |
| Aristo Sham | Hong Kong | S$^2$ | 56% | 19.20 | | 6% | 18.04 | | | | | |
| Szu-Yu Su | Taiwan | S$^1$ | 69% | 19.00 | | 6% | 17.63 | | | | | |
| Arsenii Mun | Russia | Y | 63% | 18.25 | | 0% | 16.89 | | | | | |
| Marcin Wieczorek | Poland | S$^1$ | 60% | 18.99 | | Withdrew | Withdrew | Withdrew | | | | |
| Shunshun Tie | China | S$^2$ | 50% | 18.53 | | | | | | | | |
| Xiaoxuan Li | China | S$^2$ | 50% | 18.44 | | | | | | | | |
| Riko Imai | Japan | S$^2$ | 50% | 18.28 | | | | | | | | |
| Sarah Tuan | United States | S$^2$ | 50% | 18.08 | | | | | | | | |
| Zuzanna Pietrzak | Poland | S$^1$ | 50% | 18.06 | | | | | | | | |
| Jiana Peng | China | S$^1$ | 47% | 18.44 | | | | | | | | |
| Chao Wang | China | Y | 44% | 19.04 | | | | | | | | |
| Eric Guo | Canada | S$^1$ | 44% | 18.67 | | | | | | | | |
| Piotr Pawlak | Poland | S$^1$ | 44% | 18.34 | | | | | | | | |
| Xuanyi Mao | China | S$^2$ | 44% | 18.31 | | | | | | | | |
| Chelsea Guo | United States | F | 44% | 18.20 | | | | | | | | |
| Victoria Wong | Canada | S$^1$ | 38% | 18.44 | | | | | | | | |
| Zixi Chen | China | S$^1$ | 38% | 18.29 | | | | | | | | |
| Kaoruko Igarashi | Japan | S$^1$ | 38% | 17.70 | | | | | | | | |
| Yifan Hou | China | S$^1$ | 38% | 17.69 | | | | | | | | |
| Zijian Wei | China | S$^2$ | 38% | 17.45 | | | | | | | | |
| Zitong Wang | China | S$^1$ | 33% | 17.94 | | | | | | | | |
| Boao Zhang | China | K | 33% | 17.67 | | | | | | | | |
| Asaki Iwai | Japan | S$^2$ | 31% | 18.27 | | | | | | | | |
| Yupeng Mei | China | Y | 31% | 18.14 | | | | | | | | |
| Jaeyoon Lee | South Korea | S$^1$ | 31% | 17.81 | | | | | | | | |
| Yeonmin Park | South Korea | S$^1$ | 31% | 17.80 | | | | | | | | |
| Jorge González Buajasan | Cuba | Y | 31% | 17.80 | | | | | | | | |
| Yuanfan Yang | United Kingdom | S$^2$ | 27% | 17.72 | | | | | | | | |
| Julia Łozowska | Poland | S$^1$ | 25% | 18.14 | | | | | | | | |
| Joanna Goranko | Poland | S$^1$ | 25% | 17.86 | | | | | | | | |
| Junichi Ito | Japan | F | 25% | 17.47 | | | | | | | | |
| Jinhyung Park | South Korea | Y | 25% | 17.19 | | | | | | | | |
| Andrey Zenin | Russia | K | 25% | 16.88 | | | | | | | | |
| Aleksandra Świgut | Poland | F | 14% | 17.39 | | | | | | | | |
| Junhui Chen | China | S$^2$ | 13% | 17.40 | | | | | | | | |
| Rikono Takeda | Japan | S$^2$ | 13% | 17.00 | | | | | | | | |
| Yilan Zhao | China | S$^1$ | 13% | 17.44 | | | | | | | | |
| Joo-Yeon Ka | South Korea | Y | 13% | 17.21 | | | | | | | | |
| Yangyang Ruan | China | S$^1$ | 13% | 16.87 | | | | | | | | |
| Leonardo Pierdomenico | Italy | S$^1$ | 13% | 16.81 | | | | | | | | |
| Tomasz Marut | Poland | S$^1$ | 6% | 17.13 | | | | | | | | |
| Ziji Zoé Zhao | China | F | 0% | 17.13 | | | | | | | | |
| San Jittakarn | Thailand | S$^1$ | 0% | 16.63 | | | | | | | | |
| Saaya Hara | Japan | S$^1$ | 0% | 16.50 | | | | | | | | |
| Aleksandra Hortensja Dąbek | Poland | S$^2$ | 0% | 16.38 | | | | | | | | |
| Anastasia Yasko | Russia | S$^1$ | 0% | 14.16 | | | | | | | | |
*Nikolay Khozyainov played on the Steinway ending in 300 for the first round, then switched to the Steinway ending in 479 for the remainder of the competition.

## Jury

There were three juries corresponding to each phase of the competition. The qualifying committee screened more than 500 video applications and admitted 164 candidates into the preliminary round. Of these, the preliminary round jury admitted 78 participants to the main stage, joined by nine pianists who qualified directly. The main competition jury narrowed the field of candidates further through three competition stages, culminating in a final with twelve pianists.
In all stages except the final, jurors gave candidates two assessments: a simple YES or NO on whether to accept the candidate into the next stage of the competition, and an integer score from 1 to 25 (25 being the highest). A YES required the juror to give at least 17 points for the preliminaries and 18, 19, and 20 points for Stage I, Stage II, and Stage III, respectively. When calculating the average score, scores were bounded within 3 points (preceding Stage II) or 2 points (Stage II and III) of the true average; for example, if the true average were 14.35 in Stage I, all scores lower than 12 would be adjusted to 11.35 and all scores higher than 17 would be adjusted to 17.35, and the average would then be calculated again. Based on these two assessments, but without the participants' names, the jury made the decision on admitting candidates to the next stage.
In the final, Jurors assessed candidates on a scale from 1 to 10, while the highest score of 10 was allowed to be given only once. Jurors were to take the candidate's performances in the preceding stages into account. As in the main stages, the score average was adjusted with a permitted difference of 2 points.
Jury members were compelled to recuse themselves from assessing a former or current student.

### Qualifying committee

The qualifying committee consisted of:
* Lech Dudzik
* Janusz Olejniczak
* Piotr Paleczny
* Katarzyna Popowa-Zydroń (chairwoman)
* Wojciech Świtała [pl]

### Preliminary round jury

The preliminary round jury consisted of:
* Ludmil Angelov [bg]
* Philippe Giusiano
* Alberto Nosè
* Piotr Paleczny
* Ewa Pobłocka [pl]
* Dina Joffe
* Katarzyna Popowa-Zydroń (chairwoman)
* John Rink [fr]
* Marta Sosińska-Janczewska
* Wojciech Świtała [pl]
* Stefan Wojtas [pl]

### Competition jury

The main competition jury consists of numerous pianists, many of whom were participants and prize-winners in previous editions of the Chopin Competition.
* Dmitri Alexeev
* Sa Chen (4th XIV)
* Đặng Thái Sơn ( X)
* Akiko Ebi (5th X)
* Philippe Giusiano ( XIII)
* Nelson Goerner (HM XIII)
* Adam Harasiewicz ( V)
* Krzysztof Jabłoński [pl] ( XI)
* Kevin Kenner ( XII)
* Arthur Moreira Lima ( VII)
* Janusz Olejniczak (6th VIII)
* Piotr Paleczny ( VIII)
* Ewa Pobłocka [pl] (5th X)
* Katarzyna Popowa-Zydroń (chairwoman; HM IX)
* John Rink [fr]
* Wojciech Świtała [pl] (HM XII)
* Dina Joffe ( IX)
Nelson Freire and Martha Argerich withdrew prior to the start of the competition and were replaced by Arthur Moreira Lima.

## Controversy

Contestants from Taiwan were initially labeled as "PRC Taiwan" in a participant list that was published in March 2020 on the competition website. It was then later revised to "China Taiwan". However, after Taiwan's Representative Office in Warsaw lodged a protest, it was again revised to "Chinese Taipei", according to Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which cited that the designation issue was a result of political interference from Beijing, and that "Chinese Taipei", while not the designation Taiwan would prefer, would be "acceptable".

## Broadcasting

In Poland, the competition was broadcast on national channel TVP1 and on Polskie Radio Program II. All performances were also livestreamed on YouTube, and included, for the first time, a 4K broadcast and a virtual reality (VR) broadcast. In New York, London, Paris, Budapest, Moscow, Jerusalem, Seoul and Tokyo, the Adam Mickiewicz Institute collaborated with the Chopin Institute to create "listener's zones", where the competition was streamed in specially arranged spaces.