# August 2023 Ohio Issue 1

Elections in Ohio :
Federal government
U.S. President
1804
1808
1812
1816
1820
1824
1828
1832
1836
1840
1844
1848
1852
1856
1860
1864
1868
1872
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
Dem
2004
Dem
2008
Dem
Rep
2012
Rep
2016
Dem
Rep
2020
Dem
2024
Rep
U.S. Senate
1803
1807
1808
1808 (sp)
1809 (sp)
1810 (sp)
1812
1813
1814 (sp)
1815
1819
1821
1822 (sp)
1824
1827
1828 (sp)
1830
1833
1836
1837
1838
1842
1844
1849
1851
1854
1856
1860
1861 (sp)
1863
1866
1868
1872
1874
1877 (sp)
1880
1881
1884
1886
1890
1892
1896
1897 (sp)
1898
1902
1904
1904 (sp)
1909
1911
1914
1916
1920
1922
1926
1928
1928 (sp)
1930 (sp)
1932
1934
1938
1940
1944
1946
1946 (sp)
1950
1952
1954 (sp)
1956
1958
1962
1964
1968
1970
1974
1976
1980
1982
1986
1988
1992
1994
1998
2000
2004
2006
2010
2012
2016
2018
2022
2024
2026 (sp)
2028
U.S. House of Representatives
1803
1804
1806
1808
1810
1812
1813
sp: 3
sp: 6
1814
1816
sp: 1
1818
1820
1821
sp: 4
1822
1824
1826
sp: 10
1827
sp: 8
1828
sp: 6
1830
sp: 11
1832
1834
sp: 1
sp: 19
1836
1837
sp: 17
1838
sp: 16
sp: 19
1840
sp: 4
1842
sp: 16
1843
1844
sp: 10
sp: 21
1846
1847
sp: 7
1848
1849
sp: 6
1850
1851
sp: 6
1852
1854
1856
1858
1859
sp: 14
1860
1861
sp: 7
sp: 13
1862
1864
1866
1867
sp: 2
1868
sp: 8
1870
sp: 10
1872
sp: 1
1874
1876
1878
1880
sp: 19
1882
1883
sp: 16
sp: 17
1884
1886
1888
1890
1892
sp: 16
1894
sp: 2
sp: 3
1896
1898
sp: 19
1899
sp: 16
1900
1902
1903
sp: 16
1904
sp: 19
1906
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
sp: 14
1920
1922
1924
1926
1927
sp: 2
1928
1930
1931
sp: 1
sp: 20
1932
1934
1936
sp: 11
sp: AL
1938
1940
sp: 17
sp: 22
1942
1944
1946
1947
sp: 4
1948
1950
1951
sp: 3
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
sp: 6
1962
1964
1965
sp: 7
1966
1968
1970
sp: 19
1972
1974
sp: 1
1976
1978
1980
1981
sp: 4
1982
sp: 17
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1993
sp: 2
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2005
sp: 2
2006
2
2007
sp: 5
2008
sp: 11
2010
2012
2014
2016
sp: 8
2018
sp: 12
2020
2021
sp: 11
sp: 15
2022
2024
sp: 6 :
State government
General elections
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
Gubernatorial elections
1803
1805
1807
1808
1810
1812
1814
1816
1818
1820
1822
1824
1826
1828
1830
1832
1834
1836
1838
1840
1842
1844
1846
1848
1850
1851
1853
1855
1857
1859
1861
1863
1865
1867
1869
1871
1873
1875
1877
1879
1881
1883
1885
1887
1889
1891
1893
1895
1897
1899
1901
1903
1905
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
1920
1922
1924
1926
1928
1930
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
1942
1944
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1962
1966
1970
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
2026
Complete list
Lieutenant Governor elections
Complete list
Secretary of State elections
2022
Complete list
Attorney General elections
2008 sp
2010
2014
2018
2022
Complete list
State Auditor elections
Complete list
State Treasurer elections
Complete list
State Supreme Court elections
Complete list
State House elections
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
State Senate elections
2018
2020
2022
2024 :
Ballot measures
2004
Issue 1
2011
Issue 2
2018
Issue 1
2022
Issue 1
2023
August Issue 1
November Issue 1
Issue 2
2024
Issue 1 :
Akron
Mayoral elections
2023 :
Cincinnati
Mayoral elections
2001
2005
2009
2013
2017
2021
City Council elections
List of elections :
Cleveland
Mayoral elections
1901
1933
1935
1937
1939
1941
1943
1945
1947
1949
1951
1953
1955
1957
1959
1961
1962 (special)
1963
1965
1967
1969
1971
1973
1975
1977
1978 (recall)
1979
1981
1985
1989
1993
1997
2001
2005
2009
2013
2017
2021
City Council elections
2021 :
Columbus
Mayoral elections
1899
1901
1903
1905
1907
1909
1919
1911
1913
1915
1919
1923
1927
1931
1935
1939
1943
1947
1951
1955
1959
1963
1967
1971
1975
1979
1983
1987
1991
1995
1999
2003
2007
2011
2015
2019
2023
City Council elections
2023 :
Cuyahoga County
County executive elections
2010
2014
2018
2022
County Council elections
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018 :
Toledo
Mayoral elections
2013
2015 (special)
2017
2021 :
vte :
A special election was held in the U.S. state of Ohio on August 8, 2023, on a referendum to make it substantially harder for voter-led initiatives intending to amend the Ohio State Constitution to be proposed and approved.
The initiative itself made no mention of other political issues in the state, but campaigning on both sides was frequently tied to the main hot-button topic on the ballot that coming November, also called Issue 1, which would have protected significant access to abortion within the state. The failure of this issue cleared the way for that later initiative to be passed by Ohio's voters.
This issue was defeated by 57% to 43%, amid unusually high voter turnout for an off-year election held in August, with over 3 million ballots cast overall.

## Origins and basic provisions

The Ohio state constitution is one of many within the United States that allows issues to be proposed directly to the state's population. The allowance of voter-led initiatives was written into the constitution by the Initiative and Referendum Process Amendment of 1912, and since then, the official system for proposing additional amendments in this way was as follows:
    (1): A petition must be filed with 1,000 initial signatures, and approved by the Ohio Ballot Board.
    (2): The petition must gain a number of signatures of at least 10% of people that voted for governorship of the state in the most recent gubernatorial election, and
    (2.1): Those signatures need to be gathered from at least half (44) of Ohio's counties, and at least half of counties must have at least 5% of their eligible voters sign.
    (3): If enough signatures are not deemed valid by the Secretary of State to require additional signatures, the petition organizers have 10 additional days (known as a cure period) to collect more.
    (4): Once the signatures are collected and the petition is deemed valid, the Ohio Ballot Board will decide the exact language, add supportive and opposing arguments, and put it before voters for election.
    (5): If a simple majority (50%+1) of Ohio voters voted for passage, the amendment is added and becomes law 30 days afterward.
On March 22, 2023, a Senate Joint Resolution was brought forward by Senators Rob McColley and Theresa Gavarone to hold a special election on August 8th of that year for changing these requirements. This resolution went through committee relatively easily, and passed both the Ohio House and Senate on May 10th. The vote on the issue was split along party lines, with almost all Republicans voting for the proposal and all Democrats voting against. (a foreshadowing of the political polarization to come on this initiative)
If passed, this amendment would have changed the amending system for citizen initiatives in the following ways:
    (1): Instead of requiring 44 counties to meet the 5% of eligible voters' threshold, petitions made, starting on January 1, 2024, would have increased that number to all 88 counties of Ohio.
    (2): The cure period of 10 days to collect additional signatures (if necessary) would be eliminated, with no replacement process on petitions started after January 1st, 2024.
    (3): The required simple majority for amendments to pass would be increased to a 60% supermajority. This was to take effect immediately after passage.
These changes would have not only made gaining ballot access for future initiatives to be proposed in 2024 and beyond significantly more difficult, but it also would have made passage for initiatives more difficult as well, especially on issues that polarized the electorate along political lines, as Ohio is a state that is split closely on party affiliation between Republican and Democratic-leaning voters.

## Politics surrounding Issue 1
### Election date controversy

The choice of August 8th as the date to hold this election was a controversial and highly criticized move. Elections that are not scheduled traditionally after the first Monday in November in Ohio, especially in years where there is not a presidential or gubernatorial race, are well known for having much lower voter turnout than other elections. It was alleged almost immediately after the Issue's announcement that this choice was a deliberate move by its Republican creators to take advantage of this likely lower turnout for getting the issue passed, despite a majority of total voters being against the issue.
Making the case for legislator hypocrisy further was the passage of House Bill 458 within the state at the beginning of that year, which (among other changes to election systems) explicitly banned special elections from being held in August, which would have seemingly also stopped this election from going forward. Both of this Issue's main sponsors in the Senate also voted to pass that bill into law. This apparent contradiction was immediately pounced upon by opponents, whom quickly filed suit in the Ohio Supreme Court to stop the election.
The suit was filed against Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose, who had also publicly expressed support for the removal of August special elections, saying that they “aren’t good for taxpayers, election officials, voters or the civic health of our state.” However, Frank himself disregarded his earlier statements and argued in defense here that a special election brought forward by the legislature (as this one was) could be done without restriction, citing general overriding constitutional authority. Most outside views on the controversy generally disagreed with LaRose's arguments, but regardless, the Court ruled 4-3 that the request would be denied, and the election would go on as scheduled. This vote was also party-line, with the four Republicans of the court voting to deny, and the three Democrats voting to push forward with the stoppage.

### Near-term political effects

Both left-leaning and right-leaning politicians, think tanks, activist groups, and associated organizations pushed their views on how this issue could affect the future status of societal proposals, especially when it came to the upcoming issue of abortion rights.
Republican legislators had been angling to restrict abortions after six weeks of gestation for over a decade within the state, and in 2019 they finally got their wish, with Governor Mike DeWine signing Senate Bill 23, the 'heartbeat bill', into law. However, due to Roe v. Wade providing protection for abortions federally, this law was not enforceable at the time. The 2022 overturn of Roe v. Wade removed this federal protection, and thus the heartbeat standard became official throughout the state. Pro-abortion advocates and organizations launched several lawsuits almost immediately to take down the law, and were eventually successful in gaining an injunction in September of that year. That injunction was immediately appealed up to the Ohio Supreme Court, and as of May 2023 they had not made a ruling on the matter. Therefore, as of then, abortions were allowed, tenuously, up to 20 weeks after pregnancy.
November's Issue 1 would have written that allowance into the state constitution, making SB 23 null and void and keeping the question of abortion rights out of the hands of state legislators. The raising of vote requirements to 60%, if put in force, would have severely affected the chance for this issue to pass. Polling on abortion rights during the past year leading up showed that support for keeping expanded abortion protections was only around 58%, which would not have been enough to overcome the new requirements.
Many supporters of this initiative were not quiet about wanting the upcoming abortion question to fail. LaRose, a Republican himself, admitted as such while railing against a whole list of hypothetical left-leaning proposals that this issue could imperil:
"And this [issue] is 100% about keeping a radical pro-abortion amendment out of our constitution, the left wants to jam it in there this coming November, and so yes, this is 100% about abortion..."
Pro- and Anti-abortion groups quickly latched onto the issue as well, painting it as essentially a referendum on the abortion question three months before the proper vote on the matter. This included a flood of donations, many coming from outside Ohio, through several abortion-focused PACs: around thirteen million dollars was poured in to two explicitly anti-abortion groups: Protect Women Ohio and Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America. The amount for explicitly pro-abortion groups was much smaller, with Ohio Physicians for Reproductive Rights (the only major 'no' group) giving a mere $750,000.
Weed legalization, though not nearly as attention-grabbing as abortion, was the other of the two major proposals on the ballot the upcoming November. Since that issue (Issue 2) would have been presented to voters in the same way as the November Issue 1, one might think that this initiative passing would have raised that issue's passing requirement as well, however, this is not the case. The legalization issue was an initiated statute, rather than a constitutional amendment, and was thus not affected in any way by the proposed changes.

### Other claimed political ramifications

The party-polarization of Issue 1 also made claims regarding future effects bend along party lines.
As mentioned before, LaRose mentioned more than just the abortion question while drumming up support. He also claimed two other proposals to come, including raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour (a petiton for such was being attempted at the time), and an unspecified reduction of 2nd Amendment rights (likely referencing states expanding red flag laws, among other similar anti-gun changes). One pro-Issue 1 campaign ad also took aim at the ACLU for their opposition of Ohio House Bill 8, which disallowed schools from notifing parents of their child's change of gender identity and allowed parental scrutiny for content deemed 'sexuality content'. The same ad also mentioned the URGE group, tying their support of removing parental consent for minor abortions to the issue.
An anti-Issue 1 ad claimed that Republicans would soon ban all forms of birth control if it was to pass, although no such effort had been pushed within the state.
A debate held by NBC4 Columbus regarding Issue 1 also made mentions of an ad regarding gender-affirmation surgeries on minors, along with reiterating the claims regarding gun control.

### Effects on state policymaking

The 60% supermajority requirement was the main point of contention in regards to the Issue itself. By far the easiest of the changes to grasp by the average voter, this proposed move was debated heavily among Ohioans both in-person and on the internet, with several campaign ads specifically focused on communicating how this change would effect their ability to make choices.
Opponents of Issue 1 campaigned heavily on the notion that this change was nothing more than an effort to weaken the power of the people in regards to changing the politics of their state. The new rules, in their view, were only an attempt to directly take away power from the voters, serving more to solidify a minority rule over Ohio by allegedly corrupt politicians than any other claimed purpose.
Supporters argued the opposite, that it in fact helped the democratic process by guarding against corporate interests pushing money to get issues onto the ballot, and allowing the voters to make their voice heard via electing their legislators on issues they cared about more directly. One campaign ad also referenced the United States Constitution, and how that document requires a minimum of two-thirds support from Congress to edit (in addition to the 3/4 states support requirement).
Regardless of which opinion one would hold, the facts of the matter are that making petitions harder to succeed and requiring a supermajority for amendments would have significantly reduced Ohioans' ability to use direct votes on political matters, instead leaving the task of changing policy much more in the hands of the Ohio General Assembly. The Ohio General Assembly is one of the most gerrymandered legislatures in the United States, biased heavily towards the Republican Party. As mentioned earlier, Ohioans themselves are split roughly 55–45 in favor of Republican support, however, the General Assembly, both House and Senate, are much more slanted. As of the 135th Assembly, the Ohio House contains 67 Republicans and 32 Democrats (67% R), while the Ohio Senate contains 26 Republicans and 7 Democrats (75% R).
For a theoretical Democratic-leaning major proposal to pass within this state, the following incredibly unlikely sequence would need to occur:
    (1): The bill would pass through its appropriate committees in one of the two chambers. (Almost all committees have Republican majorities, and none whatsoever have a Democratic majority)
    (2): Once through committee, it would have to pass through both chambers of the legislature (which, assuming party-line voting, would require 18 Republicans to cross over in the House, and 10 in the Senate, a cross-over which almost never happens except for unanimous votes on minor legislation)
    (3): It would need to be signed by the Governor (which would likely be a Republican given the voter spread, and he/she would likely veto, sending it back to the chambers)
    (4): If vetoed, it would need to gain three-fifths support from House and Senate to override (needing 28 and 13 Republican crossovers respectively, obviously more unlikely than the simple majority before)
Were the issue to have passed, the chance that a left-leaning political proposal would become law via legislature is all but zero, given the polarization of both parties. The 60% threshold would have been, in effect, the minimum barrier for such policies to have any chance whatsoever of survival.

### Lead-up to the vote

With this initiative quickly gaining national prominence as well as state, money began to pour in from all over, a large sum of which did in fact come from out-of-state donors. Both sides received a large majority of their money from out-of state, with the anti-Issue 1 group Protect Our Constitution receiving a full $4 million out of its total $4.8 million from the conservative Illinois donor Richard Uihlein. The pro-Issue 1 group, One Person One Vote, received $4 million of their funds from two left-leaning groups: the Tides Foundation and the Sixteen Thirty Fund. These funds were in addition to major donations from other national groups such as the National Education Association and the left-leaning organizer Karla Jurvetson. Counting all forms of funding, by the time all campaigning for Issue 1 had concluded, over $37 million was raised for influencing; $20.5 million toward the "No" side, and $17.5 million toward the "Yes" side.
One Person One Vote sued the state in May, arguing that some of the ballot language on the issue was misleading. They claimed that the language was misleading for four reasons: the title implying that any form of constitutional amendment was subject to signature requirements, incomplete communication regarding the 5% county signatures requirement, the ballot not having information on what current law stated, and the word 'elevate' in the title having a positive connotation that would sway voters toward the 'Yes' side. The next month, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled on the matter, agreeing with the first two arguments, but not the latter two, and mandating the ballot be rewritten by the state's Ballot Board. The Board did so shortly afterwards and the new, final language was officially certified on May 18th.
This Issue was the fourth in the past five years attempting to put in supermajority requirements for passing amendments, all in Republican-led states. Of those four, three were rejected by voters, with the fourth (in Arizona) only applying to tax-related proposals. The most recent failure at the time was in Arkansas, that proposal being defeated with a 59–40 split in 2022. The most recent full-scale passing measure was in Colorado in 2016, that inititative passing with a 55% vote.

## Endorsements

The amendment was supported by the Republican Party of Ohio and opposed by a multipartisan coalition of groups including the Democratic Party of Ohio, Libertarian Party of Ohio, Green Party of Ohio, and several former Republican officials. Four former governors of Ohio, John Kasich, Ted Strickland, Bob Taft, and Dick Celeste, favored a "no" vote on Issue 1, along with a large majority of Ohio newspapers. Current Ohio Governor DeWine (a Republican) announced his support in a news conference.
U.S. Executive Branch officials
* Michael Flynn, 24th United States National Security Advisor (2017) (Republican)
* Mike Pence, 48th Vice President of the United States (2017–2021) (Republican)
U.S. Senators
* J. D. Vance, U.S. Senator from Ohio (2023–present) (Republican)
U.S. Representatives
* Bill Johnson, U.S. Representative from OH-6 (2011–present) (Republican)
* Jim Jordan, U.S. Representative from OH-4 (2007–present) (Republican)
* Steve Stivers, former U.S. Representative from OH-15 (2011–2021), Head of the Ohio Chamber of commerce (Republican)
Statewide officials
* Mike DeWine, 70th Governor of Ohio (2019–present) (Republican)
* Keith Faber, 33rd Auditor of Ohio (2019–present) (Republican)
* Jon Husted, 66th Lieutenant Governor of Ohio (2019–present) and 53rd Secretary of State of Ohio (2011–2019) (Republican)
* Frank LaRose, 51st Secretary of State of Ohio (2019–present) (Republican)
* Robert Sprague, 49th Treasurer of Ohio (2019–present) (Republican)
* Dave Yost, 51st Attorney General of Ohio (2019–present) and 32nd Auditor of Ohio (2011–2019) (Republican)
State Senators
* Jerry Cirino, state senator from the 18th district (2021–present)
* Matt Huffman, 96th President of the Ohio Senate (2021–present) and state senator from the 12th district (2017–present) (Republican)
* Rob McColley, Majority Leader of the Ohio Senate (2023–present) from the 1st district (2017–present) (Republican)
State House members
* Adam Bird, state representative from the 63rd district (2023–present) and 66th district (2021–2022)
* Ron Ferguson, state representative from the 96th district (2021–present) (Republican)
* Jim Hoops, state representative from the 81st district (2018–present) (Republican)
* Don Jones, state representative from the 95th district (2019–present) (Republican)
* Susan Manchester, state representative from the 78th district (2019–present) (Republican)
* Dick Stein, state representative from the 54th district (2017–present) (Republican)
* Brian Stewart, state representative from the 12th district (2021–present) (Republican)
Individuals
* Jim Caviezel, actor
* Abby Johnson, anti-abortion activist
* Kari Lake, former television news anchor and Republican nominee in the 2022 Arizona gubernatorial election
* Richard Uihlein, founder of Uline
Organizations
* Center for Christian Virtue
* Metric Media
* National Federation of Independent Business
* Ohio Chamber of Commerce
* Ohio Hotel & Lodging Association
* Ohio Republican Party
* Ohio Restaurant Association
* Ohio Right to Life
* Ohio Farm Bureau
U.S. Senators
* Sherrod Brown, U.S. Senator from Ohio (2007–present) (Democrat)
U.S. Representatives
* Joyce Beatty, U.S. Representative from OH-3 (2013–present) (Democrat)
* Shontel Brown, U.S. Representative from OH-11 (2021–present) (Democrat)
* Marcy Kaptur, U.S. Representative from OH-9 (1983–present) (Democrat)
* Greg Landsman, U.S. Representative from OH-1 (2023–present) (Democrat)
* Nancy Pelosi, U.S. Representative from CA-11 (2023–present), CA-12 (2013–2023), CA-08 (1993–2013) and CA-05 (1987–1993), Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives (2007–2011, 2019–2023), House Minority Leader (2003–2007, 2011–2019) (Democrat)
* Tim Ryan, former U.S. Representative from OH-13 (2013–2023) and OH-17 (2003–2013) (Democrat)
* Emilia Sykes, U.S. Representative from OH-13 (2023–present) (Democrat)
Former statewide officials
* Dick Celeste, 64th Governor of Ohio (1983–1991) and 55th Lieutenant Governor of Ohio (1975–1979) (Democrat)
* Richard Cordray, 49th Attorney General of Ohio (2009–2011) and 46th Treasurer of Ohio (2007–2009) (Democrat)
* Lee Fisher, 64th Lieutenant Governor of Ohio (2007–2011) and 44th Attorney General of Ohio (1991–1995) (Democrat)
* John Kasich, 69th Governor of Ohio (2011–2019) and U.S. Representative from OH-12 (1983–2001) (Republican)
* Betty Montgomery, 30th Auditor of Ohio (2003–2007) and 45th Attorney General of Ohio (1995–2003) (Republican)
* Jim Petro, 46th Attorney General of Ohio (2003–2007) and 29th Auditor of Ohio (1995–2003) (Republican)
* Nancy H. Rogers, 48th Attorney General of Ohio (2008–2009) (Democrat)
* Ted Strickland, 68th Governor of Ohio (2007–2011) and U.S. Representative from OH-6 (1997–2007) (Democrat)
* Bob Taft, 67th Governor of Ohio (1999–2007) and 49th Secretary of State of Ohio (1991–1999) (Republican)
State Senators
* Hearcel Craig, state senator from the 15th district (2019–present) (Democrat)
* Paula Hicks-Hudson, state senator from the 11th district (2023–present) (Democrat)
* Vernon Sykes, state senator from the 28th district (2017–present) (Democrat)
State House members
* Michael Curtin, state representative from the 17th district (2013–2016)
* Dani Isaacsohn, state representative from the 24th district (2023–present) (Democrat)
* Dontavius Jarrells, state representative from the 1st district (2021–present) (Democrat)
* Allison Russo, Minority Leader of the Ohio House of Representatives (2022–present) from the 7th district (2019–present) (Democrat)
* Bride Rose Sweeney, state representative from the 16th district (2018–present) (Democrat)
Local officials
* Justin Bibb, 58th Mayor of Cleveland (2022–present) (Democrat)
* Andrew Ginther, 53rd Mayor of Columbus (2016–present) (Democrat)
Individuals
* Michelle Goldberg, journalist and author
* John Legend
* David Pepper, chair of the Ohio Democratic Party (2015–2020)
* Elizabeth Walters, chair of the Ohio Democratic Party (2021–present)
* Randi Weingarten, President of the American Federation of Teachers (2008–present)
Organizations
* American Civil Liberties Union
* Bend the Arc Jewish Action
* Common Cause Ohio
* Communist Party of Ohio
* Democratic Socialists of America
* Forward Party
* Green Party of Ohio
* Human Rights Campaign
* League of Women Voters of Ohio
* Libertarian Party of Ohio
* NAACP
* Ohio Citizen Action
* Ohio Democratic Party
* Sixteen Thirty Fund
* Swing Left
* Tides Foundation
Labor unions
* Ohio AFL–CIO
* Ohio Association of Professional Firefighters
* Ohio Education Association
* Ohio Fraternal Order of Police
* United Food and Commercial Workers
* United Steelworkers
Newspapers
* Akron Beacon Journal
* The Blade
* The Chronicle-Telegram
* Cincinnati Enquirer
* The Columbus Dispatch
* Dayton Daily News
* The Plain Dealer
* Sandusky Register

## Polling

| Poll source | Date(s) administered | Sample size | Margin of error | Yes | No | Undecided |
| Ohio Northern University | July 17–26, 2023 | 650 (LV) | ± 3.7% | 42% | 41% | 17% |
| USA Today/Suffolk University | July 9–12, 2023 | 500 (LV) | ± 4.4% | 26% | 57% | 17% |
| Scripps News/YouGov | June 20–22, 2023 | 500 (LV) | ± 5.95% | 38% | 37% | 26% |

## Outcome and aftermath

Voter turnout was unusually high, particularly for an August ballot, with approximately 39% of registered voters casting votes on the issue. The Columbus Dispatch reported that it was the highest turnout for a non-general election since the 2016 primary.
Excluding outstanding absentee by mail and provisional ballots, the Dispatch reported late on August 8 with more than 99% of the votes counted that the referendum failed by a margin of more than 14%. Of the more than 3 million votes counted, 57.11% were "no" votes and 42.89% voted "yes". Decision Desk HQ, an election results reporting agency, called the race around 8:09 p.m. EDT, while The Associated Press projected that Issue 1 had failed around 9 p.m. EDT.
The failure of this issue marked the fourth out of five Republican attempts for reducing direct voter access to be defeated. Despite this defeat, however, no major changes in party support occurred. In practice, this issue only served to highlight the stark political divisiveness between the two major parties, and put even more highlighting on the abortion issue, a question that would dominate Ohio-related politics until that November. If one was to view this vote as an abortion referendum, it would end up being a quite close predictor, as November's Issue 1 ended up passing by a nearly identical margin to this issue's failure three months later.