# 1992 Maryland Question 6

Elections in Maryland :
Federal government
Presidential elections
1788–89
1792
1796
1800
1804
1808
1812
1816
1820
1824
1828
1832
1836
1840
1844
1848
1852
1856
1860
1864
1868
1872
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Presidential primaries
Democratic
2000
2004
2008
2016
2020
2024
Republican
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
U.S. Senate elections
1788
1790
1791
1793
1793 sp
1795
1796
1796 sp
1797 sp
1800 sp
1801 sp
1802
1806
1806 sp
1808
1809
1813 sp
1816 sp
1819
1819 sp
1821
1822 sp
1825
1826 sp
1827
1831
1833
1835 sp
1836 sp
1837
1838 sp
1839
1839 sp
1841 sp
1843
1849
1850 sp
1851
1855
1861
1864 sp
1865 sp
1868 sp
1874
1878
1880
1884
1886
1890
1892
1892 sp
1896
1898
1902
1904
1908
1908 sp
1910
1913 sp
1916
1914
1920
1922
1928
1926
1932
1934
1938
1940
1944
1946
1950
1952
1956
1958
1962
1964
1968
1970
1974
1976
1980
1982
1986
1988
1992
1994
1998
2000
2004
2006
2010
2012
2016
2018
2022
2024
U.S. House of Representatives elections
1789
1790
1791
3rd sp
1792
1793
2nd sp
1794
2nd sp
3rd sp
1796
2nd sp
3rd sp
1798
7th sp
1801
1802
2nd sp
1803
1804
4th sp
1806
7th sp
1808
1810
4th sp
7th sp
1811
6th sp
1812
1814
1816
3rd sp
5th sp
1818
1820
1822
1823
5th sp
1824
1826
2nd sp
1829
1831
1832
6th sp
1833
1834
1st sp
1835
1837
1839
1841
1843
1844
1845
1847
1849
1851
1853
1855
1857
1859
1861
1863
1864
1866
1868
1870
1872
1874
1876
1878
1880
1882
1884
1886
1888
1890
1892
1st sp
1894
1st sp
5th sp
1896
1898
1900
1st sp
1902
1904
1906
1908
1910
1912
1913
3rd sp
1914
1st sp
1916
1918
2nd sp
1920
1922
1924
5th sp
1926
1928
1930
1932
4th sp
1934
1936
1938
1939
1st sp
5th sp
1940
1941
6th sp
1942
1944
1946
1947
3rd sp
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1971
1st sp
1972
1973
1st sp
1974
1976
1978
1980
1981
5th sp
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
7th sp
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
4th sp
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
7th sp
2022
2024
6th
2026 :
State government
General elections
2006
2010
2020
2022
2024
Gubernatorial elections
1838
1841
1844
1847
1850
1853
1857
1861
1864
1867
1871
1875
1879
1883
1887
1891
1895
1899
1903
1907
1911
1915
1919
1923
1926
1930
1934
1938
1942
1946
1950
1954
1958
1962
1966
1969 sp
1970
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
2026
Attorney General elections
1895
1899
1903
1907
1911
1915
1919
1923
1926
1930
1934
1938
1942
1946
1950
1954
1958
1962
1966
1970
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1996
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
2026
Comptroller elections
1895
1897
1899
1901
1903
1905
1907
1909
1911
1913
1915
1917
1919
1921
1923
1926
1930
1934
1938
1942
1946
1950
1954
1958
1962
1966
1970
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1996
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
2026
Senate elections
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
House of Delegates elections
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022 :
County government
County executive elections
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
2025 sp
County offices
2006
2010
2018
2022 :
Ballot measures
1992
Question 6
2012
Question 4
Question 6
2022
Question 4
2024
Question 1 :
Annapolis
Mayoral elections
2017
2021
2025 :
Baltimore
Mayoral elections
1899
1903
1907
1911
1915
1919
1923
1927
1931
1935
1939
1943
1947
1951
1955
1959
1963
1967
1971
1975
1979
1983
1987
1991
1995
1999
2003–04
2007
2011
2016
2020
2024
Ballot measures
Question P :
Government :
vte :
Question 6 was a voter referendum to allow voters to approve or reject a law passed by the Maryland General Assembly in 1991 to codify the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Roe v. Wade. The referendum was approved by 61.7% of voters on November 3, 1992.

## Ballot measure

A draft of the referendum language had been sent to both pro-choice and pro-life groups by Maryland Attorney General J. Joseph Curran Jr. to prevent controversy over the wording of the question. He asked the groups to comment on the draft by June 19, 1992, and, after receiving feedback, rewrote the question to use "less cryptic" language. The ballot language was revised for a third and final time before being submitted to the Maryland Secretary of State to appear on the general election ballot.
After the language was approved, the Vote kNOw Coalition filed a lawsuit asking for the ballot language to be rewritten. Judge Bruce C. Williams rejected the language and ordered the attorney general to rewrite the ballot wording in a ruling that was later struck down by the Maryland Court of Appeals.
The ballot measure read as follows:
   Question 6 Abortion Law Revision
   Revises Maryland's abortion law to prohibit State interference with woman's abortion decision before fetus is viable, or, under certain conditions, at any time and to provide certain exceptions to the requirement that a physician notify an unmarried minor's parent or guardian prior to minor's abortion; repeals pre-abortion information requirements about abortion alternatives; repeals some, and clarifies other, provisions related to abortion referral; requires that abortions be performed by licensed physicians; provides good-faith immunity under certain conditions to physicians performing abortions; authorizes State to adopt abortion regulations; repeals certain penalty and disciplinary provisions related to the performance of abortions.
The choices read as follows:
   For the Referred Law Against the Referred Law

## History

In 1968, the Maryland General Assembly passed a bill that would require abortions in the state to be performed in a hospital and approved by a hospital review committee. This legislation would later be overturned by the Supreme Court's decision in Roe v. Wade, which prevented the government from placing restrictions on abortions before fetal viability.
Legislative debate on abortion had intensified following the Supreme Court's decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, which imposed restrictions on state funding for abortions, with pro-choice lawmakers introducing a bill to codify the Roe decision amid fears that the Supreme Court would overturn its previous decision, thereby reinstating Maryland's restrictive 1968 law. Senate President Thomas V. Miller Jr., who self-identified as a pro-life, pledged to remain neutral on the debate but said that he personally favored laws that restricted abortion, adding that if the procedure was necessary, "you've got Washington, D.C., 35 miles down the road". House Speaker R. Clayton Mitchell Jr. also declined to bring any abortion bills up for a vote, saying that he would wait until the Senate takes action on the issue before he'd bring it up.
By 1990, abortion advocates had secured a majority in the Maryland Senate and introduced legislation that would codify the Roe decision, but it was unclear if the legislation had the votes to defeat a filibuster. Pro-choice lawmakers were initially unable to reach the 32 votes required to break the Republican-led filibuster, with the Senate voting 28–18 to continue debate on the bill. Legislators continued to filibuster the bill for eight days before coming to an agreement to couple the abortion rights legislation with another bill that would prevent the bill from going into effect until voters approved of it in a statewide referendum. However, both bills were killed by state delegate William A. Clark in the House Environmental Matters Committee, who argued in voting against the two bills that action on the House floor would be "chaotic" and force legislators "to go on record on the vote". In that year's state Senate elections, pro-abortion group Choice PAC primaried four incumbent Democratic state senators who filibustered the abortion rights bill, giving advocates the votes they needed to pass the bill during next year's legislative session.
At the start of the 1991 legislative session, Miller promised that the abortion bill would be "the first major issue the Senate takes up" that year. The new bill included a parental notification clause that Miller believed the public would be more accepting of it was to head to a referendum. Anti-abortion state senators conceded that they did not have the votes to hold a filibuster on the bill, but said they would propose amendments to the bill that would outlaw abortions for sex-select reasons, ban abortion services advertising, and requiring parental consent for abortions performed on underage girls. All amendments to the bill were rejected after five and a half hours of debate, and the bill eventually passed and was signed into law by Governor William Donald Schaefer. Afterwards, anti-abortion activists, led by former Lieutenant Governor Samuel Bogley and his Right to kNOw Coalition, said they planned to collect enough signatures to petition the law in the 1992 general election. In late June, the coalition submitted 143,622 voter signatures—more than four times the 33,373 valid signatured required—to petition the law, which were certified by the Maryland State Board of Elections in July.

## Campaign

Pro-choice groups led raised $1.6 million during the campaign to support Question 6, with most contributions being transferred to the Maryland for Choice committee, while abortion opponents raised $1.46 million, almost all of which was through the Vote kNOw Coalition. The pro-life campaign involved criticizing the 1991 abortion bill as "extremist", while abortion advocates called it a "moderate compromise". Anti-Question 6 ballots were also distributed in Roman Catholic churches and other congregations, and television commercials opposing Question 6, including one featuring neurosurgeon Ben Carson, were ran on WMAR-TV and WBAL-TV. Carson later condemned the advertisement and asked for it to be taken down, saying that he had not known that he was making a political advertisement.
Turnout in the 1992 general elections were boosted by Question 6 and tax issues, which the Maryland Republican Party believed would hurt President George H. W. Bush, who was pro-life.

### Endorsements

U.S. Senators
* Bill Bradley, U.S. Senator from New Jersey (Democrat)
U.S. Representatives
* Kweisi Mfume, U.S. Representative from Maryland's 7th congressional district (Democrat)
* Parren Mitchell, former U.S. Representative from Maryland's 7th congressional district (Democrat)
Statewide officials
* Hillary Clinton, First Lady of Arkansas and wife of presidential nominee Bill Clinton (Democrat)
* Nelson J. Sabatini, Secretary of the Maryland Department of Health and Hygiene (Democrat)
* Melvin Steinberg, Lieutenant Governor of Maryland (Democrat)
State delegates
* Delores G. Kelley, state delegate from the 42nd district (Democrat)
* Lawrence A. LaMotte, state delegate from district 5B (Democrat)
* Mary Louise Preis, state delegate from the 34th district (Democrat)
* Samuel I. Rosenberg, state delegate from the 42nd district (Democrat)
Local officials
* Kurt Schmoke, mayor of Baltimore (Democrat)
Party officials
* Vera Hall, chair of the Maryland Democratic Party (Democrat)
Individuals
* Marion C. Bascom, civil rights leader and pastor at Madison Avenue Methodist Episcopal Church
* Gloria Steinem, journalist and social-political activist
Organizations
* American Civil Liberties Union
* Maryland League of Women Voters
* National Abortion Rights Action League
* Planned Parenthood of Maryland
Newspapers
* The Baltimore Sun
* The Daily Times
* The Star Democrat
U.S. Executive Branch officials
* Alan Keyes, former Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs (Republican)
Statewide elected officials
* Samuel Bogley, former Lieutenant Governor of Maryland (Democrat)
State senators
* Larry E. Haines, state senator from the 5th district (Republican)
State delegates
* Marsha G. Perry, state delegate from the 33rd district (Democrat)
Individuals
* Frederica Mathewes-Green, author and speaker
Organizations
* Maryland Catholic Conference

## Opinion polls

| Poll source | Date(s) administered | Sample size | Margin of error | For | Against | Undecided |
| George Washington University | October 20–24, 1992 | 403 (RV) | ± 4.0% | 70% | 20% | 10% |
| Mason-Dixon Research | October 1992 | 809 (RV) | ± 3.5% | 52% | 36% | 12% |
| Mason-Dixon Research | August 28–30, 1992 | 802 (RV) | ± 3.5% | 54% | 29% | 17% |
| Mason-Dixon Research | June 3–5, 1992 | 815 (LV) | ± 3.5% | 60% | 32% | 8% |
| KPC Research | February 10–15, 1992 | 1,210 (RV) | ± 2.8% | 57% | 31% | 12% |
* ↑ Key: A – all adults RV – registered voters LV – likely voters V – unclear
* ↑ "Had not heard of the referendum" with 2%

## Results

1992 Maryland Question 6 :
| Choice | Votes | % |
| Yes | 1,114,377 | 61.74 |
| No | 690,542 | 38.26 |
| Total votes | 1,804,919 | 100.00 |
Source: Maryland State Board of Elections

### County breakdown

| By county | For | For | Against | Against | Total votes | Total votes |
| By county | Votes | % | Votes | % | Total votes | Total votes |
| Allegany | 9,478 | 38.60% | 15,079 | 61.40% | 24,557 | 100.00% |
| Anne Arundel | 108,394 | 60.40% | 71,077 | 39.60% | 179,471 | 100.00% |
| Baltimore | 180,818 | 61.38% | 113,755 | 38.62% | 294,573 | 100.00% |
| Baltimore City | 132,697 | 66.37% | 67,237 | 38.62% | 199,934 | 100.00% |
| Calvert | 10,944 | 56.62% | 8,385 | 43.38% | 19,329 | 100.00% |
| Caroline | 3,482 | 49.52% | 3,550 | 50.48% | 7,032 | 100.00% |
| Carroll | 26,362 | 51.00% | 25,328 | 49.00% | 51,690 | 100.00% |
| Cecil | 11,015 | 48.73% | 11,590 | 51.27% | 22,605 | 100.00% |
| Charles | 14,994 | 50.32% | 14,804 | 49.68% | 29,798 | 100.00% |
| Dorchester | 4,789 | 54.26% | 4,037 | 45.74% | 8,826 | 100.00% |
| Frederick | 32,721 | 54.26% | 29,042 | 47.02% | 61,763 | 100.00% |
| Garrett | 2,683 | 30.13% | 6,223 | 69.87% | 8,906 | 100.00% |
| Harford | 41,125 | 53.07% | 36,360 | 46.93% | 77,485 | 100.00% |
| Howard | 63,141 | 64.80% | 34,305 | 35.20% | 97,446 | 100.00% |
| Kent | 4,026 | 65.01% | 2,167 | 34.99% | 6,193 | 100.00% |
| Montgomery | 246,361 | 70.12% | 104,982 | 29.88% | 351,343 | 100.00% |
| Prince George's | 153,741 | 66.25% | 78,328 | 33.75% | 232,069 | 100.00% |
| Queen Anne's | 7,542 | 60.38% | 4,948 | 39.62% | 12,490 | 100.00% |
| St. Mary's | 9,852 | 46.87% | 11,166 | 53.13% | 21,018 | 100.00% |
| Somerset | 2,350 | 41.89% | 3,260 | 58.11% | 5,610 | 100.00% |
| Talbot | 7,643 | 63.77% | 4,342 | 36.23% | 11,985 | 100.00% |
| Washington | 19,187 | 47.19% | 21,473 | 52.81% | 40,660 | 100.00% |
| Wicomico | 12,975 | 52.24% | 11,861 | 47.76% | 24,836 | 100.00% |
| Worcester | 8,057 | 52.66% | 7,243 | 47.34% | 15,300 | 100.00% |
| Total | 1,114,377 | 61.74% | 690,542 | 38.26% | 1,804,919 | 100.00% |