# Parliamentary motion to impeach Tony Blair

* This article is part of a series aboutTony Blair
Electoral history
MP for Sedgefield
Beaconsfield by-election
Leader of the Opposition
Leadership election
Brown Deal
Shadow Cabinet
Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
Premiership
Policies
New Labour, New Life for Britain
Blairism
New Labour
Third Way
Appointments
"Tony's Cronies"
"Blair Babes"
First ministry and term (May 1997 – June 2001)
Ministry
1997 election
Chancellorship of Gordon Brown
1997 budget
1998 budget
1999 budget
2000 budget
2001 budget
Good Friday Agreement
peace process
Handover of Hong Kong
People's princess
Kosovo War
Military intervention in Sierra Leone
Second ministry and term (June 2001 – May 2005)
Ministry
2001 re-election
9/11
War on terror
War in Afghanistan
2003 invasion of Iraq
Iraq and weapons of mass destruction
Saddam–al-Qaeda conspiracy theory
Bush memo
Downing Street memo
February Dossier
September Dossier
Ultimatum to Iraq
Iraq War
2002 budget
2003 budget
2004 budget
2005 budget
Third ministry and term (May 2005 – June 2007)
Ministry
2005 re-election
Cabinet reshuffle
2006 budget
2007 budget
Cash for Honours
London bombings
Respect agenda
Leadership succession
Post–Prime Minister
2007 Sedgefield by-election
Quartet on the Middle East
A Journey (autobiography)
Associates
Faith Foundation
Iraq Inquiry
Sports Foundation
Institute for Global Change :
vte :
In November 2004, a cross-party group of British members of parliament tabled a motion in the House of Commons to impeach the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom at the time, Tony Blair for "high crimes and misdemeanours". The motion was never debated.

## Viability

In the UK the most recent previous impeachment motion was made in 1848 (by Thomas Chisholm Anstey against the Foreign Secretary Lord Palmerston, who was accused of concluding a secret treaty with Russia). The campaigners first needed to establish that impeachment was still viable in modern politics. On 17 November 2004 the speaker ruled their motion in order and it was tabled for the next session.

## Initial presentation

In August 2004, Plaid Cymru MP Adam Price commissioned and published the report: A Case to Answer: a first report on the potential impeachment of the Prime Minister for High Crimes and Misdemeanours in relation to the invasion of Iraq. The document was written by Dr Glen Rangwala (lecturer of politics at University of Cambridge) and Dan Plesch (Honorary Fellow of Birkbeck, University of London.)

## Legal opinion

The campaign hired solicitor Phil Shiner of Public Interest Lawyers to represent their case. They have also asked Matrix Chambers to draw up a legal opinion. Matrix is known for its advocacy of human rights cases and for being the barristers' chambers of Blair's wife and Queen's Counsel, Cherie Booth. Booth was not involved in the case due to the obvious conflict of interest.

## Drafting team

The drafting team for the motion was announced on 13 October 2004:
* Douglas Hogg QC MP
* Edward Garnier QC MP
* Elfyn Llwyd MP
* Alex Salmond MP
It appeared that the team would also draft the articles of impeachment. In earlier impeachment cases, this has usually been done after the motion, although it also occurred first in the case of Warren Hastings.
The drafting team completed the text of the impeachment motion on 7 November 2004.

## Impeachment motion

   Impeachment Motion – Conduct of the Prime Minister in relation to the war against Iraq
   That a select committee of not more than 13 Members be appointed to investigate and to report to the House on the conduct of the Prime Minister in relation to the war against Iraq and in particular to consider;
   (a) the conclusion of the Iraq Survey Group that in March 2003 Iraq did not possess weapons of mass destruction and had been essentially free of them since the mid 1990s
   (b) the Prime Minister’s acknowledgement that he was wrong when in and before March 2003 he asserted that Iraq was then in possession of chemical or biological weapons or was then engaged in active efforts to develop nuclear weapons or was thereby a current or serious threat to the UK national interest or that possession of WMD then enabled Iraq to inflict real damage upon the region and the stability of the world
   (c) the opinion of the Secretary General of the United Nations that the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was unlawful
   (d) whether there exist sufficient grounds to impeach the Rt Hon Tony Blair on charges of gross misconduct in his advocacy of the case for war against Iraq and in his conduct of policy in connection with that war.
   That the Committee shall within 48 days of its appointment report to this House such resolutions, articles of impeachment or other recommendations as it shall think fit.
The legal advisers to the Speaker of the House of Commons, Michael Martin, approved the wording of the motion on 17 November 2004. The motion was tabled for the first day of the next session (the day after the Queen's Speech) on 24 November 2004. However, the main three parties forbade their MPs from signing the motion and it was never selected for debate.
If the motion had been selected, it would have allowed MPs to debate matters that parliamentary language otherwise forbids. For example, on 17 March 2005, the anniversary of going to war, Price accused Tony Blair of misleading the house. Because this breached the rules of parliamentary language, he was required to leave the House for the remainder of the day. However, such rules only apply to debate within the House. In press and radio and television interviews, other MPs have accused Blair of lying to the House and to the British people, including then opposition leader Michael Howard.