# 1991 Chicago mayoral election

Elections in Illinois :
Federal government
U.S. Presidential elections
1820
1824
1828
1832
1836
1840
1844
1848
1852
1856
1860
1864
1868
1872
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
Dem
Rep
1988
1992
1996
Dem
Rep
2000
Dem
Rep
2004
Dem
Rep
2008
Dem
Rep
2012
Dem
Rep
2016
Dem
Rep
2020
Dem
Rep
2024
Dem
Rep
U.S. Senate elections
1818
1819
1823
1824
1824 sp
1825
1830 sp
1831
1835
1837
1843
1846
1849
1849 sp
1853
1859
1861
1863 sp
1867
1879
1882
1885
1885 sp
1887 sp
1888
1890
1894
1896
1897
1901
1903
1907
1909
1913
1913 sp
1914
1918
1920
1924
1926
1928 sp
1930
1932
1936
1938
1940 sp
1942
1944
1948
1950
1954
1956
1960
1962
1966
1968
1970 sp
1972
1974
1978
1980
1984
1986
1990
1992
1996
1998
2002
2004
2008
2010
2010 sp
2014
2016
2020
2022
2026
U.S. House elections
1818
1819
1820
1822
1824
1826
1828
1831
1832
1834
1836
1838
1840
1842
1844
1846
1848
1850
1852
1854
1856
1858
1859
6th sp
1860
1861
6th sp
1862
1864
1866
1868
1870
1871
AL sp
1872
1874
1876
1878
1880
1882
1884
1886
1888
1890
1892
1894
1895
10th sp
18th sp
1896
1898
1900
1902
1904
1906
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
4th sp
1920
1922
AL sp
1923
2nd sp
4th sp
1924
1926
1928
1930
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
1942
1944
19th sp
1946
1948
1950
1952
1953
7th sp
1954
1956
1957
7th sp
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1969
13th sp
1970
6th sp
1972
15th sp
1973
7th sp
1974
1975
5th sp
1976
1978
1980
10th sp
1982
1983
1st sp
1984
1985
14th sp
1986
1988
21st sp
1990
1991
15th sp
1992
1994
1995
2nd sp
1996
1998
2000
1st
2002
2004
2006
2008
14th sp
2009
5th sp
2010
17th
2012
2013
2nd sp
2014
2015
18th sp
2016
2018
2020
2022
1st
2024 :
State government
General elections
1936
1938
1940
1942
1944
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1969
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
Gubernatorial elections
1818
1822
1826
1830
1834
1838
1842
1846
1848
1852
1856
1860
1864
1868
1872
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
Lieutenant Gubernatorial elections
1818
1822
1826
1830
1834
1838
1842
1846
1848
1852
1856
1860
1864
1868
1872
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
Attorney General elections
2018
2022
Secretary of State elections
2022
Comptroller elections
2016
Senate elections
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
House of Representatives elections
1964
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
Judicial elections
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024 :
Ballot measures and referendums
State capitol referendum (1834)
Cutback Amendment (1980)
Crime Victim Rights Amendment (1992)
Illinois Governor Recall Amendment (2010)
Public Pension Amendment (2012)
Marsy's Law (2014)
Right to Vote Amendment (2014)
Transportation Taxes and Fees Lockbox Amendment (2016)
Fair Tax (2020)
Right to Collective Bargaining Amendment (2022) :
Chicago
General elections
2019
2023
Mayoral elections
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1860
1861
1862
1863
1865
1867
1869
1871
1873
1876
1877
1879
1881
1883
1885
1887
1889
1891
1893
1893 sp
1895
1897
1899
1901
1903
1905
1907
1911
1915
1919
1923
1927
1931
1935
1939
1943
1947
1951
1955
1959
1963
1967
1971
1975
1977 sp
1979
1983
1987
1989 sp
1991
1995
1999
2003
2007
2011
2015
2019
2023
2027
Aldermanic elections
1923
1925
1927
1929
2011
2015
2019
2023
Chicago Board of Education elections
2024
2026 :
Cook County
County elections
1946
1980
State's Attorney
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024 :
vte :
The Chicago mayoral election of 1991 resulted in the re-election of incumbent Democrat Richard M. Daley to his first full four-year term. Daley had previously been elected to serve the remainder of Harold Washington's unexpired term in a special election held following Washington's death in office.
Daley won by a landslide 44 point margin. His most significant opponent in general election was Harold Washington Party nominee R. Eugene Pincham. Other candidates were Republican candidate George Gottlieb and Socialist Workers Party nominee James Warren, both of whom performed poorly in the vote count.
The Democratic Party, Republican Party, and the Harold Washington Party all held primary elections for their nominations. Daley easily won the Democratic primary, receiving more than 63.01% of the vote and placing more than thirty-points ahead of the runner-up, then-Cook County commissioner Danny K. Davis. Former mayor Jane Byrne made a distant third-place finish in the Democratic primary, receiving less than 5.90% of the vote. In the Republican primary, which saw participation by a dismal 10,204 voters, George S. Gotlieb, a police sergeant, defeated candidate Alfred Walter Balciunas and radio executive Pervis Spann by a large double-digit margin. James R. Hutchison won the Harold Washington Party primary as a write-in candidate as a formality to secure the party ballot status in the general election. Afterwards, he stepped aside to allow the party's vice chairman, Illinois Appellate Court Judge Pincham, to become the party's nominee

## Democratic primary

* Richard M. Daley, incumbent mayor since 1989
* Jane Byrne, former mayor (1979–1983)
* Danny Davis, member of the Cook County Board of Commissioners

### Declined to run

The following individuals received speculation as prospective candidates, but did not run:
* Eugene Sawyer, former mayor (1987–1989)

### Campaigning

Daley handily won the Democratic nomination, fending off challenges from then-county commissioner Danny K. Davis and former mayor Jane Byrne.
Daley announced on December 10, 1990, that he would seek reelection. The following day Daley held a fundraiser at the Hyatt Regency Chicago which raised more than a million dollars for his campaign. This, when added to his existing campaign funds, meant that by the third day of his candidacy he already had 2 million dollars in funding. Neither of his competitors could come anywhere remotely near him in fundraising. Daley –who had won a special election in 1989– was the strong frontrunner for the 1991 Democratic nomination. A poll conducted by the Chicago Sun-Times in November 1990 showed that 58% of Chicagoan's had positive views of his performance as mayor. A Southtown Economist poll conducted after his campaign announcement showed him with a 61% approval rating, and also showed him to be polling at a 2 to 1 margin over his closest challenger, Danny Davis. Daley benefited from a variety of factors, including solid voting blocs supporting his candidacy, his strong managerial style as mayor, and lack of public interest in local politics amid the Gulf War, which assisted Daley's hopes to have a low-profile campaign.
Davis and Byrne hoped they would be able to debate Daley. However, Daley declined to participate in any debates.
Davis had been selected as a "consensus" black candidate at a closed-door meeting held November 19, 1990 at the Hyde Park Hilton between 126 of Chicago's African-American leaders. They voted 66–60 to support Davis over a prospective run by former mayor Eugene Sawyer. While Davis had planned to campaign in all areas of the city, his funds were too limited to support a citywide campaign, requiring him to focus on select neighborhoods. Late in the primary, Tyrone Crider, the national executive director of Operation PUSH, characterized the Davis campaign as a "slow movement" because it had "failed to take the time necessary to meet and consult with the [black] religious and business community." Both Crider and PUSH founder Jesse Jackson became upset when Davis disparaged a number of black ministers that had supported Daley as being "Uncle Toms".
Byrne's campaign was hampered by her inability to raise funds. Her campaign was considered to be rather weak, and received no support from any significant community or business leaders. During her run, she argued that Chicago's, "deserved better leadership in City Hall". She attempted to provoke Daley into publicly fueding with her, but he did not take her bait. Chicago Sun-Times writer Steve Neal referred to Byrne as the Norma Desmond of Chicago politics, meaning that she was delusional in her belief that she could stage a comeback. In her 1991 campaign, Byrne was observed to be most comfortable when campaigning in the African-American community.
Perennial candidate Sheila A. Jones had also run in the previous two elections' Democratic primaries. She was a supporter of the LaRouche movement.
Daley was endorsed in the primary by the editorial board of the Chicago Tribune.

### Results

Black turnout was lower in the 1991 primary than it had been in the 1989 primary. Daley's share among black voters was ultimately higher than analysts had anticipated, with Daley securing double-digit support.
Due to the contest being overshadowed by the Gulf War, and due to voter apathy towards the election as a result of Daley's overwhelming lead in the polls, turnout was considered low, at under 48%. This was believed to have been among the lowest turnouts in fifty years for a mayoral primary in Chicago.
Daley set a new record for the largest margin of victory in a Democratic primary, surpassing the previous record (set by his father in 1975). Daley's performance in the primary was perceived as placing him an unbeatable position to win the general election, with Chicago being an overwhelmingly Democratic city, and the Democratic nomination being widely considered as tantamount to election. Even though he was likely to face a third-party African-American opponent, this was not seen as enough to prevent his victory (especially considering that, as a candidate, Davis had not been able to pose much of a challenge to Daley in the primary).
Democratic primary results :
| Party | Party | Candidate | Votes | % |
| | Democratic | Richard M. Daley (incumbent) | 408,418 | 63.01 |
| | Democratic | Danny K. Davis | 199,408 | 30.76 |
| | Democratic | Jane M. Byrne | 38,216 | 5.90 |
| | Democratic | Sheila A. Jones | 2,146 | 0.33 |
| Total votes | Total votes | Total votes | 648,188 | |

#### Results by ward

Daley won a majority of the vote in 31 wards and Davis won a majority of the vote in the remaining 19 wards.
Results by ward
| Ward | Richard M. Daley | Richard M. Daley | Danny K. Davis | Danny K. Davis | Jane M. Byrne | Jane M. Byrne | Sheila A. Jones | Sheila A. Jones | Total |
| Ward | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes |
| 01 | 7,912 | 65.2% | 3,366 | 27.8% | 794 | 6.5% | 55 | 0.5% | 12,127 |
| 02 | 1,471 | 15.9% | 6,950 | 75.3% | 737 | 8.0% | 74 | 0.8% | 9,232 |
| 03 | 982 | 13.8% | 5,484 | 77.0% | 605 | 8.5% | 49 | 0.7% | 7,120 |
| 04 | 2,438 | 24.0% | 7,126 | 70.0% | 554 | 5.4% | 58 | 0.6% | 10,176 |
| 05 | 3,059 | 25.6% | 8,319 | 69.7% | 511 | 4.3% | 50 | 0.4% | 11,939 |
| 06 | 2,052 | 12.2% | 13,917 | 82.5% | 845 | 5.0% | 58 | 0.3% | 16,872 |
| 07 | 2,331 | 26.3% | 5,922 | 66.9% | 560 | 6.3% | 36 | 0.4% | 8,849 |
| 08 | 1,872 | 12.4% | 12,465 | 82.6% | 666 | 4.4% | 87 | 0.6% | 15,090 |
| 09 | 1,384 | 13.4% | 8,269 | 80.3% | 580 | 5.6% | 59 | 0.6% | 10,292 |
| 10 | 9,548 | 60.3% | 4,043 | 25.5% | 2,179 | 13.8% | 56 | 0.4% | 15,826 |
| 11 | 15,914 | 92.6% | 875 | 5.1% | 391 | 2.3% | 10 | 0.1% | 17,190 |
| 12 | 12,477 | 90.0% | 729 | 5.3% | 636 | 4.6% | 25 | 0.2% | 13,867 |
| 13 | 26,094 | 94.9% | 226 | 0.8% | 1,142 | 4.2% | 20 | 0.1% | 27,482 |
| 14 | 11,017 | 87.8% | 973 | 7.8% | 537 | 4.3% | 25 | 0.2% | 12,552 |
| 15 | 3,159 | 32.1% | 6,031 | 61.3% | 600 | 6.1% | 49 | 0.5% | 9,839 |
| 16 | 1,216 | 13.1% | 7,233 | 77.8% | 758 | 8.2% | 91 | 1.0% | 9,298 |
| 17 | 1,104 | 10.6% | 8,599 | 82.6% | 644 | 6.2% | 58 | 0.6% | 10,405 |
| 18 | 12,519 | 62.4% | 6,455 | 32.2% | 1,028 | 5.1% | 49 | 0.2% | 20,051 |
| 19 | 19,947 | 84.3% | 2,492 | 10.5% | 1,179 | 5.0% | 32 | 0.1% | 23,650 |
| 20 | 1,108 | 12.7% | 6,980 | 79.7% | 583 | 6.7% | 85 | 1.0% | 8,756 |
| 21 | 1,580 | 10.5% | 12,638 | 84.1% | 748 | 5.0% | 64 | 0.4% | 15,030 |
| 22 | 3,862 | 76.8% | 685 | 13.6% | 451 | 9.0% | 29 | 0.6% | 5,027 |
| 23 | 22,539 | 94.5% | 170 | 0.7% | 1,117 | 4.7% | 25 | 0.1% | 23,851 |
| 24 | 951 | 9.9% | 7,948 | 83.2% | 591 | 6.2% | 68 | 0.7% | 9,558 |
| 25 | 5,065 | 78.0% | 901 | 13.9% | 499 | 7.7% | 25 | 0.4% | 6,490 |
| 26 | 5,506 | 73.4% | 1,306 | 17.4% | 661 | 8.8% | 33 | 0.4% | 7,506 |
| 27 | 1,920 | 26.3% | 4,782 | 65.4% | 550 | 7.5% | 59 | 0.8% | 7,311 |
| 28 | 761 | 9.6% | 6,716 | 84.5% | 426 | 5.4% | 45 | 0.6% | 7,948 |
| 29 | 1,445 | 14.5% | 7,858 | 78.8% | 580 | 5.8% | 85 | 0.9% | 9,968 |
| 30 | 10,826 | 82.0% | 1,592 | 12.1% | 765 | 5.8% | 24 | 0.2% | 13,207 |
| 31 | 5,120 | 65.3% | 1,865 | 23.8% | 823 | 10.5% | 30 | 0.4% | 7,838 |
| 32 | 8,934 | 83.9% | 994 | 9.3% | 689 | 6.5% | 28 | 0.3% | 10,645 |
| 33 | 10,865 | 86.6% | 789 | 6.3% | 852 | 6.8% | 39 | 0.3% | 12,545 |
| 34 | 1,703 | 13.3% | 10,339 | 80.9% | 674 | 5.3% | 64 | 0.5% | 12,780 |
| 35 | 11,660 | 90.1% | 437 | 3.4% | 825 | 6.4% | 23 | 0.2% | 12,945 |
| 36 | 17,827 | 90.6% | 676 | 3.4% | 1,133 | 5.8% | 35 | 0.2% | 19,671 |
| 37 | 1,040 | 11.8% | 7,214 | 82.0% | 500 | 5.7% | 42 | 0.5% | 8,796 |
| 38 | 18,535 | 93.3% | 226 | 1.1% | 1,094 | 5.5% | 18 | 0.1% | 19,873 |
| 39 | 12,826 | 91.2% | 427 | 3.0% | 785 | 5.6% | 28 | 0.2% | 14,066 |
| 40 | 9,562 | 88.2% | 653 | 6.0% | 605 | 5.6% | 24 | 0.2% | 10,844 |
| 41 | 19,634 | 90.2% | 323 | 1.5% | 1,793 | 8.2% | 23 | 0.1% | 21,773 |
| 42 | 8,563 | 74.9% | 2,026 | 17.7% | 804 | 7.0% | 36 | 0.3% | 11,429 |
| 43 | 12,556 | 86.4% | 1,316 | 9.1% | 632 | 4.3% | 33 | 0.2% | 14,537 |
| 44 | 10,376 | 82.7% | 1,539 | 12.3% | 614 | 4.9% | 21 | 0.2% | 12,550 |
| 45 | 18,464 | 92.7% | 302 | 1.5% | 1,122 | 5.6% | 26 | 0.1% | 19,914 |
| 46 | 9,009 | 71.4% | 2,699 | 21.4% | 857 | 6.8% | 52 | 0.4% | 12,617 |
| 47 | 11,423 | 87.7% | 915 | 7.0% | 672 | 5.2% | 20 | 0.2% | 13,030 |
| 48 | 7,491 | 73.1% | 2,111 | 20.6% | 617 | 6.0% | 33 | 0.3% | 10,252 |
| 49 | 6,912 | 68.8% | 2,509 | 25.0% | 573 | 5.7% | 55 | 0.5% | 10,049 |
| 50 | 13,859 | 89.3% | 998 | 6.4% | 635 | 4.1% | 33 | 0.2% | 15,525 |
| Totals | 408,418 | 63.0% | 199,408 | 30.8% | 38,216 | 5.9% | 2,146 | 0.3% | 648,188 |

## Republican primary

George S. Gotlieb defeated Alfred Walter Balciunas and WVON executive Pervis Spann in the Republican primary . Gotlieb, a police sergeant, was not well-known. Gottlieb was endorsed in the primary by the editorial board of the Chicago Tribune.
Brette X. New had also been running initially, but withdrew.

### Results

Republican primary results :
| Party | Party | Candidate | Votes | % |
| | Republican | George S. Gottlieb | 4,942 | 48.4 |
| | Republican | Alfred Walter Balciunas | 2,961 | 29.0 |
| | Republican | Pervis Spann | 2,301 | 22.5 |
| Total votes | Total votes | Total votes | 10,204 | |

#### Results by ward

Results by ward
| Ward | George S. Gottlieb | George S. Gottlieb | Alfred Walter Balciunas | Alfred Walter Balciunas | Pervis Spann | Pervis Spann | Total |
| Ward | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes |
| 1 | 136 | 49.6% | 76 | 27.7% | 62 | 22.6% | 274 |
| 2 | 20 | 9.7% | 23 | 11.2% | 163 | 79.1% | 206 |
| 3 | 15 | 16.0% | 15 | 16.0% | 64 | 68.1% | 94 |
| 4 | 28 | 27.5% | 14 | 13.7% | 60 | 58.8% | 102 |
| 5 | 38 | 32.8% | 24 | 20.7% | 54 | 46.6% | 116 |
| 6 | 25 | 17.7% | 15 | 10.6% | 101 | 71.6% | 141 |
| 7 | 14 | 21.2% | 15 | 22.7% | 37 | 56.1% | 66 |
| 8 | 14 | 12.0% | 12 | 10.3% | 91 | 77.8% | 117 |
| 9 | 19 | 21.8% | 13 | 14.9% | 55 | 63.2% | 87 |
| 10 | 216 | 46.7% | 189 | 40.8% | 58 | 12.5% | 463 |
| 11 | 66 | 40.5% | 69 | 42.3% | 28 | 17.2% | 163 |
| 12 | 74 | 38.3% | 100 | 51.8% | 19 | 9.8% | 193 |
| 13 | 95 | 36.5% | 147 | 56.5% | 18 | 6.9% | 260 |
| 14 | 44 | 26.0% | 101 | 59.8% | 24 | 14.2% | 169 |
| 15 | 13 | 15.7% | 31 | 37.3% | 39 | 47.0% | 83 |
| 16 | 5 | 6.7% | 13 | 17.3% | 57 | 76.0% | 75 |
| 17 | 19 | 17.8% | 13 | 12.1% | 75 | 70.1% | 107 |
| 18 | 60 | 31.9% | 70 | 37.2% | 58 | 30.9% | 188 |
| 19 | 198 | 62.1% | 88 | 27.6% | 33 | 10.3% | 319 |
| 20 | 17 | 15.3% | 21 | 18.9% | 73 | 65.8% | 111 |
| 21 | 18 | 15.1% | 9 | 7.6% | 92 | 77.3% | 119 |
| 22 | 39 | 47.0% | 33 | 39.8% | 11 | 13.3% | 83 |
| 23 | 109 | 40.8% | 131 | 49.1% | 27 | 10.1% | 267 |
| 24 | 24 | 26.1% | 15 | 16.3% | 53 | 57.6% | 92 |
| 25 | 33 | 40.2% | 35 | 42.7% | 14 | 17.1% | 82 |
| 26 | 50 | 44.6% | 35 | 31.2% | 27 | 24.1% | 112 |
| 27 | 38 | 39.6% | 22 | 22.9% | 36 | 37.5% | 96 |
| 28 | 17 | 23.6% | 16 | 22.2% | 39 | 54.2% | 72 |
| 29 | 22 | 28.9% | 17 | 22.4% | 37 | 48.7% | 76 |
| 30 | 126 | 58.6% | 67 | 31.2% | 22 | 10.2% | 215 |
| 31 | 54 | 37.5% | 58 | 40.3% | 32 | 22.2% | 144 |
| 32 | 77 | 48.4% | 59 | 37.1% | 23 | 14.5% | 159 |
| 33 | 76 | 46.1% | 62 | 37.6% | 27 | 16.4% | 165 |
| 34 | 10 | 9.7% | 16 | 15.5% | 77 | 74.8% | 103 |
| 35 | 209 | 68.1% | 65 | 21.2% | 33 | 10.7% | 307 |
| 36 | 194 | 62.2% | 92 | 29.5% | 26 | 8.3% | 312 |
| 37 | 27 | 33.8% | 13 | 16.2% | 40 | 50.0% | 80 |
| 38 | 241 | 64.8% | 105 | 28.2% | 26 | 7.0% | 372 |
| 39 | 150 | 59.3% | 75 | 29.6% | 28 | 11.1% | 253 |
| 40 | 141 | 57.6% | 80 | 32.7% | 24 | 9.8% | 245 |
| 41 | 372 | 67.8% | 122 | 22.2% | 55 | 10.0% | 549 |
| 42 | 237 | 56.4% | 115 | 27.4% | 68 | 16.2% | 420 |
| 43 | 253 | 63.9% | 90 | 22.7% | 53 | 13.4% | 396 |
| 44 | 206 | 62.6% | 80 | 24.3% | 43 | 13.1% | 329 |
| 45 | 284 | 73.0% | 74 | 19.0% | 31 | 8.0% | 389 |
| 46 | 184 | 55.8% | 106 | 32.1% | 40 | 12.1% | 330 |
| 47 | 143 | 60.1% | 68 | 28.6% | 27 | 11.3% | 238 |
| 48 | 214 | 55.4% | 117 | 30.3% | 55 | 14.2% | 386 |
| 49 | 121 | 53.1% | 71 | 31.1% | 36 | 15.8% | 228 |
| 50 | 157 | 62.5% | 64 | 25.5% | 30 | 12.0% | 251 |
| Totals | 4,942 | 48.4% | 2,961 | 29.0% | 2,301 | 22.5% | 10,204 |

## Harold Washington Party primary

James R. Hutchinson, who won the party primary, withdrew after winning, stepping aside for R. Eugene Pincham to assume the nomination. Hutchison was the vice-chairman of the Harold Washington Party.
When he won the nomination, Hutchinson ran for mayor in the party's primary as a write-in candidate so that the party could have a mayoral candidate, thus ensuring that the party would maintain its place on the ballot in the general election, as Illinois law required parties to run full-slates. His strategy was to win enough write-in votes to secure the party's nomination as a write-in, but not to take too many voters away from the Democratic primary in fears of otherwise hurting Davis` chances against Daley. Danny K. Davis had been in November 1991 by black leaders as a consensus African-American candidate to challenge Daley for mayor in the Democratic primary, and was backed by the Harold Washington Party during his Democratic primary campaign. Hutchinson stated before the Democratic primary that if Davis did not beat Daley, Hutchison would immediately withdraw from the Washington Party ticket to allow a stronger candidate to run in the general election with assurances from Davis that he would support such a candidate. After Davis lost to Daley in the Democratic primary, Hutchison kept his promise, stepped aside, and allowed Pincham to be the Harold Washington Party candidate for mayor. Pincham was a former appellate judge who had left the Democratic Party after losing its 1990 nomination for Cook County Board President to Richard Phelan.

## Socialist Workers nomination

The Socialist Workers Party nominated 1988 presidential candidate James Warren.

## General election

Having no significant general election opponents, Daley's campaign activity was relatively minimal. He utilized strong field operations in the city's wards and distributed issue briefing papers.
Daley declined to participate in any debates.

### Results

Daley won by a large margin.
Daley received roughly 25% of the African-American vote.
Mayor of Chicago 1991 (general election) :
| Party | Party | Candidate | Votes | % |
| | Democratic | Richard M. Daley | 450,581 | 70.64 |
| | Harold Washington | R. Eugene Pincham | 160,302 | 25.13 |
| | Republican | George S. Gottlieb | 23,421 | 3.67 |
| | Socialist Workers | James Warren | 3,581 | 0.56 |
| Turnout | Turnout | Turnout | 637,885 | |
Daley won a majority in 31 of the city's wards, with Pincham winning a majority in the remaining 19 wards.
Results by ward
| Ward | Richard M. Daley (Democratic Party) | Richard M. Daley (Democratic Party) | R. Eugene Pincham (Harold Washington Party) | R. Eugene Pincham (Harold Washington Party) | George S. Gottlieb (Republican Party) | George S. Gottlieb (Republican Party) | James Warren (Socialist Workers Party) | James Warren (Socialist Workers Party) | Under votes | Under votes | Over votes | Over votes | Total |
| Ward | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes |
| 1 | 8,424 | 70.6% | 2,604 | 21.8% | 387 | 3.2% | 73 | 0.6% | 263 | 2.2% | 177 | 1.5% | 11,928 |
| 2 | 2,321 | 29.0% | 5,044 | 63.1% | 148 | 1.9% | 47 | 0.6% | 240 | 3.0% | 193 | 2.4% | 7,993 |
| 3 | 1,544 | 24.3% | 4,257 | 67.1% | 83 | 1.3% | 43 | 0.7% | 191 | 3.0% | 228 | 3.6% | 6,346 |
| 4 | 4,086 | 34.7% | 6,366 | 54.0% | 249 | 2.1% | 177 | 1.5% | 754 | 6.4% | 156 | 1.3% | 11,788 |
| 5 | 3,581 | 34.2% | 6,086 | 58.2% | 241 | 2.3% | 94 | 0.9% | 346 | 3.3% | 118 | 1.1% | 10,466 |
| 6 | 3,402 | 21.8% | 11,342 | 72.8% | 159 | 1.0% | 37 | 0.2% | 404 | 2.6% | 242 | 1.6% | 15,586 |
| 7 | 2,715 | 35.7% | 4,517 | 59.3% | 114 | 1.5% | 30 | 0.4% | 166 | 2.2% | 72 | 0.9% | 7,614 |
| 8 | 3,050 | 22.7% | 9,627 | 71.5% | 162 | 1.2% | 36 | 0.3% | 438 | 3.3% | 145 | 1.1% | 13,458 |
| 9 | 2,301 | 21.8% | 7,526 | 71.3% | 120 | 1.1% | 43 | 0.4% | 449 | 4.3% | 123 | 1.2% | 10,562 |
| 10 | 12,055 | 65.4% | 3,626 | 19.7% | 1,743 | 9.5% | 78 | 0.4% | 842 | 4.6% | 84 | 0.5% | 18,428 |
| 11 | 16,795 | 92.1% | 758 | 4.2% | 238 | 1.3% | 20 | 0.1% | 310 | 1.7% | 108 | 0.6% | 18,229 |
| 12 | 12,715 | 90.3% | 586 | 4.2% | 440 | 3.1% | 26 | 0.2% | 228 | 1.6% | 83 | 0.6% | 14,078 |
| 13 | 27,321 | 94.9% | 140 | 0.5% | 894 | 3.1% | 32 | 0.1% | 334 | 1.2% | 54 | 0.2% | 28,775 |
| 14 | 11,920 | 88.7% | 884 | 6.6% | 308 | 2.3% | 27 | 0.2% | 242 | 1.8% | 62 | 0.5% | 13,443 |
| 15 | 4,066 | 39.6% | 5,514 | 53.7% | 118 | 1.1% | 55 | 0.5% | 382 | 3.7% | 134 | 1.3% | 10,269 |
| 16 | 2,264 | 22.5% | 6,819 | 67.7% | 92 | 0.9% | 59 | 0.6% | 656 | 6.5% | 181 | 1.8% | 10,071 |
| 17 | 1,954 | 19.8% | 7,197 | 72.9% | 105 | 1.1% | 45 | 0.5% | 318 | 3.2% | 260 | 2.6% | 9,879 |
| 18 | 13,795 | 66.7% | 5,558 | 26.9% | 616 | 3.0% | 46 | 0.2% | 553 | 2.7% | 106 | 0.5% | 20,674 |
| 19 | 19,890 | 85.9% | 1,863 | 8.0% | 968 | 4.2% | 48 | 0.2% | 349 | 1.5% | 43 | 0.2% | 23,161 |
| 20 | 2,141 | 23.6% | 6,093 | 67.2% | 132 | 1.5% | 51 | 0.6% | 467 | 5.1% | 189 | 2.1% | 9,073 |
| 21 | 2,616 | 19.1% | 10,295 | 75.3% | 114 | 0.8% | 52 | 0.4% | 375 | 2.7% | 221 | 1.6% | 13,673 |
| 22 | 3,053 | 81.0% | 408 | 10.8% | 92 | 2.4% | 28 | 0.7% | 131 | 3.5% | 56 | 1.5% | 3,768 |
| 23 | 23,914 | 93.9% | 93 | 0.4% | 926 | 3.6% | 29 | 0.1% | 456 | 1.8% | 56 | 0.2% | 25,474 |
| 24 | 2,125 | 20.1% | 7,239 | 68.5% | 103 | 1.0% | 84 | 0.8% | 745 | 7.1% | 267 | 2.5% | 10,563 |
| 25 | 6,004 | 76.6% | 865 | 11.0% | 207 | 2.6% | 46 | 0.6% | 649 | 8.3% | 64 | 0.8% | 7,835 |
| 26 | 5,238 | 79.5% | 741 | 11.2% | 213 | 3.2% | 69 | 1.0% | 258 | 3.9% | 71 | 1.1% | 6,590 |
| 27 | 2,928 | 37.4% | 4,028 | 51.4% | 123 | 1.6% | 70 | 0.9% | 480 | 6.1% | 201 | 2.6% | 7,830 |
| 28 | 1,302 | 18.9% | 5,045 | 73.3% | 67 | 1.0% | 50 | 0.7% | 184 | 2.7% | 232 | 3.4% | 6,880 |
| 29 | 2,532 | 26.3% | 6,343 | 66.0% | 141 | 1.5% | 53 | 0.6% | 394 | 4.1% | 153 | 1.6% | 9,616 |
| 30 | 10,145 | 84.7% | 1,054 | 8.8% | 456 | 3.8% | 33 | 0.3% | 200 | 1.7% | 93 | 0.8% | 11,981 |
| 31 | 6,513 | 69.4% | 1,545 | 16.5% | 226 | 2.4% | 80 | 0.9% | 929 | 9.9% | 88 | 0.9% | 9,381 |
| 32 | 9,095 | 87.4% | 543 | 5.2% | 303 | 2.9% | 84 | 0.8% | 284 | 2.7% | 102 | 1.0% | 10,411 |
| 33 | 11,060 | 88.7% | 497 | 4.0% | 451 | 3.6% | 80 | 0.6% | 292 | 2.3% | 84 | 0.7% | 12,464 |
| 34 | 2,767 | 23.7% | 8,305 | 71.3% | 109 | 0.9% | 50 | 0.4% | 229 | 2.0% | 196 | 1.7% | 11,656 |
| 35 | 12,365 | 90.1% | 207 | 1.5% | 735 | 5.4% | 65 | 0.5% | 284 | 2.1% | 62 | 0.5% | 13,718 |
| 36 | 18,292 | 91.5% | 448 | 2.2% | 871 | 4.4% | 39 | 0.2% | 261 | 1.3% | 91 | 0.5% | 20,002 |
| 37 | 2,083 | 23.7% | 6,028 | 68.4% | 87 | 1.0% | 60 | 0.7% | 372 | 4.2% | 177 | 2.0% | 8,807 |
| 38 | 20,794 | 91.6% | 150 | 0.7% | 1,278 | 5.6% | 49 | 0.2% | 378 | 1.7% | 59 | 0.3% | 22,708 |
| 39 | 13,331 | 91.2% | 207 | 1.4% | 773 | 5.3% | 42 | 0.3% | 213 | 1.5% | 57 | 0.4% | 14,623 |
| 40 | 9,494 | 88.7% | 293 | 2.7% | 573 | 5.4% | 76 | 0.7% | 213 | 2.0% | 53 | 0.5% | 10,702 |
| 41 | 23,642 | 89.1% | 211 | 0.8% | 2,124 | 8.0% | 25 | 0.1% | 471 | 1.8% | 68 | 0.3% | 26,541 |
| 42 | 9,919 | 79.1% | 1,525 | 12.2% | 655 | 5.2% | 70 | 0.6% | 269 | 2.1% | 101 | 0.8% | 12,539 |
| 43 | 11,391 | 87.8% | 587 | 4.5% | 640 | 4.9% | 104 | 0.8% | 213 | 1.6% | 34 | 0.3% | 12,969 |
| 44 | 9,947 | 87.0% | 525 | 4.6% | 544 | 4.8% | 158 | 1.4% | 236 | 2.1% | 28 | 0.2% | 11,438 |
| 45 | 19,073 | 91.6% | 167 | 0.8% | 1,224 | 5.9% | 48 | 0.2% | 259 | 1.2% | 60 | 0.3% | 20,831 |
| 46 | 12,062 | 71.0% | 2,691 | 15.8% | 746 | 4.4% | 287 | 1.7% | 1,128 | 6.6% | 70 | 0.4% | 16,984 |
| 47 | 12,548 | 89.6% | 392 | 2.8% | 595 | 4.2% | 149 | 1.1% | 271 | 1.9% | 54 | 0.4% | 14,009 |
| 48 | 8,070 | 77.5% | 1,356 | 13.0% | 555 | 5.3% | 116 | 1.1% | 246 | 2.4% | 64 | 0.6% | 10,407 |
| 49 | 8,560 | 73.0% | 1,689 | 14.4% | 583 | 5.0% | 333 | 2.8% | 522 | 4.4% | 47 | 0.4% | 11,734 |
| 50 | 13,378 | 90.1% | 418 | 2.8% | 590 | 4.0% | 85 | 0.6% | 285 | 1.9% | 87 | 0.6% | 14,843 |
| Totals | 450,581 | 68.0% | 160,302 | 24.2% | 23,421 | 3.5% | 3,581 | 0.5% | 19,159 | 2.9% | 5,754 | 0.9% | 662,798 |