# Ray Ison

Raymond L. Ison (born 3 July 1952, Bathurst, NSW, Australia) is an Australian-British cybernetician, systems scholar/scientist, and Professor of Systems at the Open University in the UK. He is currently President of the International Federation for Systems Research (IFSR). He was also Professor Systems for Sustainability at Monash University, and fellow at the Centre for Policy Development, and President of the International Society for the Systems Sciences in the year 2014-15. He is known for his work on systems praxeology within rural development, sustainable management, systemic governance and the design and enactment of learning systems.
David Russell, a psychotherapist and psychodynamic psychologist in private practice in Sydney and Blackheath, NSW, Australia, about Ray Ison: "All of Ison's professional work has been driven by a passion to maintain a flourishing and highly interactive life-world. His writings and research have given voice to this passion by consistently exemplifying an epistemology of action: How we know what we know; how this knowledge shapes ongoing experience; and how this experience is found to be satisfying or dissatisfying. His approach has been to focus on relationships and the networks in which they are embedded, namely, the systems."

## Awards

Foundation Medal, Wesley College (University of Sydney); Academician of IASCYS (International Academy of Systems and Cybernetic Sciences)

## Life and work

From a background in Agricultural Science (University of Sydney) including plant ecophysiology and agronomy (University of Queensland) and systems agriculture, rural development and agricultural extension (Hawkesbury & University of Sydney) Ison has established himself as a major scholar and practitioner in the field of Systems Praxeology – the science of practical action grounded in systems thinking in practice (STiP).
Ison's research and scholarship spans the biophysical and social and is primarily interdisciplinary and collaborative. He has made major contributions to systemic governance, particularly in the fields of water and river catchments based on social learning realised through STiP. Many of his publications can be seen or accessed by Open Research Online.
Ison, who took up the Chair in Systems at The Open University (UK) in 1994, is only the third appointee to the Open University (OU) chair in Systems since the group was established in 1971 (the inaugural chair was John Beishon, followed by Derek Pugh). From 2008 to 2015 he was also Professor Systems for Sustainability at Monash University (School of Geography and the Monash Sustainability Institute) where he established and ran the Systemic Governance Research Program which now continues within the Applied Systems Thinking in Practice (ASTiP) group at the OU.
Ison has been returned in all UK Research Assessment Exercises (now Research Excellence Framework or REF) with the OU Development Studies group (there is no category for Systems). In 2021 this will be Unit of Assessment 22, Anthropology and Development Studies.
Building on his academic achievements Ison has gone on to hold major leadership roles within the international Systems and Cybernetics community. He is currently President of the International Federation for Systems Research (IFSR).

## Early career - Australia-based 1982-1994

Ison began his academic career as a Lecturer at the University of Western Sydney in 1982. From 1982 to 1986 he was part of the internationally famed 'Hawkesbury Experiment' to co-develop with students a novel 'learning system' graduating Systems Agriculturalists based on capabilities to think and act systemically, to take responsibility for their own learning and to be effective communicators in processes of transformative change. Originally inspired by Richard Bawden, the Hawkesbury 'experiment' ran for 20 years and influenced agricultural education internationally.$^2$ Whilst at Hawkesbury Ison led local organisation of the international conference 'Agricultural Systems Research' $^3$ as well as becoming Director of Farming Systems overseeing the College's multi-enterprise farming operation also used as a basis for experiential learning by students. In the latter role Ison embarked upon the situated, collaborative, reflexive, systemic praxis that has been central to his career. His exploration of purpose in relation to field-crop ecosystems with Richard Bawden$^4$ and his co-authored paper: Soft-systems methodology for action research: The role of a college farm in an agricultural education institution exemplify his systemic research praxis at this time.$^5$
Ison was a pioneer in seeking and gaining funding for 'action research' projects$^6$ within the agricultural sector in Australia. The Australian Seed Industry Study (with W. Potts) was funded in 1985 by the then Rural Industries Research & Development Corporation.$^7$ The report was an exemplar of how to understand an industry holistically and to draw attention to systemic failures in organisation and structure.
In 1986 Ison moved to the University of Sydney, where he was appointed Senior Lecturer in the School of Crop Sciences. From 1986 to 1994 he created and braided two research programs.
1. Second-order R&D rather than 'Knowledge transfer'
In a long and fruitful collaboration with David Russell (formerly UWS, now WSU)$^8$ beginning in 1986 they have made a major contribution to elucidating the failings of the linear model of knowledge, or technology, transfer that dominates the mainstream innovation and agricultural extension paradigm, understandings and practices they characterised as 'first-order R&D'.$^9$ This research was built on a critical review of 'agricultural extension' practices (subsequently translated into French and Persian).$^{10}$ Co-researching with pastoralists, extension and research staff in the NSW Western Division in the CARR (Community Approaches to Rangeland Research) project (1990–94), Ison with Russell established how 'enthusiasm' (from the Greek meaning 'the god within') could be understood as theory, underlying emotion and methodology and how an R&D system could be designed based on 'common enthusiasms' rather than 'information transfer', the prevailing, yet inadequate 'first-order' paradigm.$^{11}$ In making 'second-order R&D' doable they demonstrated how the limitations of the linear model could be overcome through conceptual, praxis and institutional innovation. In addition to elucidating how enthusiasm might operate as an underpinning conception for an R&D system$^{12}$ their research:
* found that processes that sought consensus, rather than accommodations through valuing difference, undermined enthusiasm to act i.e., consensus is a lowest common denominator position;
* enthusiasm could be triggered or brought forth by providing the experience of being listened to unconditionally or by cultivating the telling of stories.$^{13}$ This experience of working with narrative was later taken up and refined by Ison with Paschen in climate change adaptation research which challenged the mainstream approach to vulnerabilities assessment)$^{14}$
* developed tools and methods for dialogic rather than debate-based communication in the praxis of co-researching – including diffusing power relations by researchers owning what they had experienced rather than telling pastoralists 'how things were' $^{15}$ $^{16}$
* elucidated how the semi-arid rangelands (and institutionalised R&D) came to be socially constructed as Europeans appropriated the landscape$^{17}$
* demonstrated how artefactual technology as well as social technologies acted to transform human experience and thus relationship with the biophysical world$^{18}$
* showed how the institutional arrangements of organised R&D undermined the capacity for researchers to act with enthusiasm (a precursor to Ison's later concern with systemic governing)$^{19}$
The CARR research is reported in the edited book by Ison & Russell (2000/2007) based on contributions from research team members.$^{20}$ Russell and Ison delivered an invited plenary talk based on this research at the IVth International Rangeland Congress in Montpellier in 1991.$^{21}$
Both Russell and Ison were influenced by the 'biology of cognition' research and epistemology of Humberto Maturana.$^{22}$ $^{23}$ Ison first met Maturana in Melbourne in 1988. Subsequently, they have maintained collaborative conversations in the UK, Chile, Ecuador, Sardinia and at ASC events in the USA. Maturana's question: 'what do we do when we do what we do? has been a leitmotif in Ison's scholarship underpinning his contributions to systems praxeology. Consequently, Ison has become recognised internationally within the Systems community as a Maturana scholar;$^{24}$ $^{25}$ Pille Bunnell, also a Maturana scholar, has been a long-term collaborator.
In the early 1990s in two invited Keynote presentations Ison outlined the case for what he then called participative ecodesign.$^{26}$ $^{27}$ When asked to address 'changing community attitudes' by the Australian Rangeland Society he argued
the case for participative ecodesign as a means of conducting future rangeland research and development. To embark on this path it will be necessary for the rangeland science community to critically question traditions and myths which shape current practices. These include current conceptions of extension, "technology transfer", community and human communication. Research has shown that attitudes of rangeland decision-makers are rarely a constraint to dealing with issues of land degradation and management and technology "adoption". Attempts to change attitudes are likely to be of little value. $^{28}$ A recognition of the unequal power relations implicit in traditional practice is a necessary precondition to the emergence of participative processes which reverse the history of subjection of grazier knowledge and values by institutionalised authority. A set of values and guiding principles are proposed for participative ecodesign. These include (i) reinterpreting our relationship with land; (ii) policy development based on citizen as opposed to individual values and (iii) acknowledging power in the design process.
In this work Ison foreshadowed the rise in interest in systemic design in the early 2000s and his own, later, concern with the responsibility of the systems practitioner to be able to take a 'design turn' in their praxis (outlined in his book Systems Practice. How to Act).
Ison also pioneered in Australian rural research the development of methods for interdisciplinary and citizen engagement in formulating research questions and projects adapted from Rapid and Participatory Appraisal (conceptualised as an antidote to 'development tourism'). His insight was to see development failure as operating as much in 'developed' countries as in 'developing countries'.$^{29}$ $^{30}$ These approaches were later adapted for application in organisations. For a period Rapid Organisational Appraisal was successfully incorporated into Open University staff induction practices by the HR Department (i.e. induction was no longer something done to you by the organisation, but a group-based inquiry carried out by inductees into the systemic nature of the organisation and used to co-design a learning experience for senior staff).$^{31}$
2. Grassland systems and grassland eco-physiology
Following from his doctoral research$^{32}$ Ison's subsequent plant eco-physiological research, mainly with PhD students, elucidated important agronomic and managerial factors associated with seed bank dynamics, seed dormancy mechanisms and nutritive characteristics for alleviating the autumn feed gap in the wheat-sheep zone of Australia.$^{33}$ $^{34}$
Within the grassland agronomy/agriculture academic and research community, and with increasing international attention, Ison pioneered, with co-researchers, approaches to understanding grasslands as both biological and human activity systems (as evidenced in the two editions of Agronomy of Grassland Systems co-authored with Craig Pearson). In the second edition (1997) Ison presented the case that 'grassland systems' should be framed 'as if' they were socially constructed systems where sustainability was an emergent property.
His concerns for the centrality of 'learning' to change processes and the efficacy of universities in enabling learning (which had been triggered at Hawkesbury) continued at the University of Sydney$^{35}$ and braided his two strands of research until circumstances forced a choice. His work with the seed industry had demonstrated that progress through agronomic and biological research was secondary to matters within the social and organisational realm (though only minimally in the economic). Such a choice is common according to Don Schön who characterised it as the crisis of relevance or rigour, a decision to descend into the swamp of real-life issues or to continue to stand on the high ground of technical rationality. His IIED Gatekeeper publication 'Teaching Threatens Sustainable Agriculture' written at this time has been influential.

## Phase 1: UK-based 1995-2005

Ison moved to the UK and the Open University (OU) at the end of 1994. During 1995 he undertook an inquiry into his new situation, producing a report called The OU from a Systems Perspective. In 1995 he became Head of the then Systems Department (1995-8; 2005-6 of 25 academic staff). His 26 years at the OU can be understood in terms of two phases marked by geography but realising significant scholarship, development and application of STiP (systems thinking in practice) as a praxeology much needed in the time of the Anthropocene.$^{36}$
1. Curriculum renewal and organisational change with STiP
From 1995 Ison led at the OU development of a new MSc becoming the first Director of the Environmental Decision Making (EDM) Program (now Environmental Management).$^{37}$ In a pioneering move for the OU he, with Chris Blackmore, organised the purchase and adaptation of a University of London (Wye College) module on Environmental Ethics. In the core EDM course from 1997 to 2006, 1398 students registered and 1122 completed, an 80% completion rate. OU course development is an example of applied R&D and involves a synthesis of research and pedagogic scholarship.
From 1996 till 2005 Ison, in the conviction that STiP should be used in the day job, i.e. one should walk the talk, led, with OU colleagues a series of reforms including:
* reorganisation of the then Systems Department into the Centre for Complexity and Change with three constituent disciplines: Systems, Development Management and Technology Management;
* a series of internal change management programs (in collaboration with HR) to build STiP capability in transitioning towards a 'learning organisation'. The most significant and effective program was PERSYST a partnership project (though organised as a systemic inquiry) of Personnel and Systems to enhance STiP capability. $^{38}$ $^{39}$ This program ran for 5 years and was led by Dr Rosalind Armson, a Senior Lecturer seconded from the Systems Department. Her book 'Growing Wings on the Way' draws on her experience.
In the period 1995-2005 there was significant renewal of undergraduate Systems Modules each requiring investment in excess of £250,000 per module and created by a module team of academics and educational technologists. Modules developed during that time included: Systems Thinking: Principles and Practice (T205); Managing Complexity. A Systems Approach (T306); Environmental Decision Making. A systems Approach (T860, T863); Environmental Ethics (T861) as well as the Information Systems PG program. Tens of thousands of mature age students have studied an OU Systems module in the last 50 years.$^{40}$
2. Researching and enacting 'learning systems'
For Ison, teaching and research are not a dualism but a duality; they are practices mediated by STiP, especially systemic action research, systemic design and/or systemic inquiry or co-inquiry. These systems practices create new ways of being, knowing and doing through their enactment enabling social learning and situational transformations. Ison has an established record of achievement in the design of learning/inquiry systems in which stakeholders can take responsibility for situation-improving action and at the same time become aware of the constraints, especially institutional constraints, $^{41}$ to their capacity to be response-able.$^{42}$ $^{43}$ $^{44}$ In the lineage of Dewey, Schön, Churchman, Bawden, Vickers and Checkland, Ison's research seeks to lay the groundwork for the emergence of 'learning systems' as an alternative to seeing 'knowledge transfer' as an 'end-of-pipe' process (see $^{45}$ $^{46}$ $^{47}$ $^{48}$) and as a means to generate transformative change through social learning (see below).
Ison was a key contributor to the LEARN Group$^{49}$ which came into being with support from the SAD Group within INRA. The concern and motivation of the group was to understand and develop learning-based approaches to change in agricultural and rural development settings. The co-edited book 'Cow up a Tree' was one outcome along with the EU-funded Learning project.$^{50}$ The title for the book was a metaphor taken from a chance encounter by the LEARN group members with the sculpture by John Kelly, one of three in an edition that caused a sensation in the modern art world in 1999, featured at the "Champs de la Sculpture" exhibition on the Champs-Élysées in Paris.
(v) Social learning as STiP and governance mechanism
Conceptually, Ison's research has been mainly at the interface between the social and biophysical. Prior to 2000 he demonstrated that stakeholder participation was necessary and powerful when done well (in developed countries as much as developing) – but participation was not sufficient when the gains made from participatory practices were not institutionalised. Poor praxis also led to the phenomenon of 'being participated'. Thus, Ison and colleagues turned their attention to researching 'social learning' built on a social theory of learning.$^{51}$ They hypothesised social learning could be enabled within multi-stakeholder platforms that facilitated collaborative and transformational action.$^{52}$ Their research hypothesis was supported in that transformations in understandings and practices towards concerted action (i.e. social learning) in a multi-stakeholder situation was possible when certain conditions were met – by attention to history (initial starting conditions), the presence of enabling (and absence of constraining) institutions, an active stakeholding in an issue, supported by attention to facilitation and to the epistemological/knowing ecology of those engaged. In the majority of their cases the presence of a formalised multi-stakeholder platform did not in itself lead to social learning.
With colleagues (including Niels Röling, Chris Blackmore, Janice Jiggins, David Gibbon, Drennan Watson, Bernard Hubert, Patrick Steyaert, Kevin Collins, Neil Powell and Pier Paolo Roggero), Ison co-developed and led (as PI) the EU funded Fifth Framework project SLIM (Social learning for the integrated management and sustainable use of water at catchment scale). Together these 31 researchers from five countries elucidated through empirical, theoretical and systemic-design research how social learning could be employed as:
* a praxis drawing upon STiP that enables situational transformation (e.g. of a river catchment) due to changes in understanding and practices of those stakeholders engaged in producing concerted action, and
* an alternative governance mechanism (to normalising practices, regulating the market or raising awareness/attempting behaviour change), for managing in complex situations, particularly water catchments and other multiple stakeholder settings.$^{53}$
The main research outcomes are summarised in a special issue of the journal 'Environmental Science & Policy', the SLIM Final Report and a set of Policy Briefs.
The SLIM research group sought to apply and enact the project as a social learning system imbued with systems practices. It was largely successful acting as a precursor to further research funded by the Europe and Global Challenges Program and in Australia by CSIRO (see below). Researchers in SLIM (with diverse disciplines, histories and contexts) did not seek to create a final synthesis of 'new knowledge' but devised a mediating heuristic which enabled different lineages of understanding to facilitate the bringing forth of differences that make a difference (to paraphrase Gregory Bateson).

## Phase 2: UK, China, South Africa and Australia – 2006-2021

SLIM presaged an ongoing body of work concerned with social learning as process and governance mechanism in a range of river catchment settings including the UK, Australia$^{54}$, South Africa, China and Western Europe.$^{55}$ $^{56}$ In a decadal review of this research in 2014 Ison and colleagues concluded that:$^{57}$
"case studies, which originated from the SLIM Project, ... constitute inquiry pathways that are explored using a critical incident approach. The initial starting conditions for each inquiry pathway [were] compared; significant pathway dependencies [were] identified which foster the development of social learning processes locally, but constrain their uptake and embedding across the wider system.... in England & Wales, promising developments in the application of social learning approaches to river basin planning over an initial 3-year period were subsequently marginalised, only to resurface towards the end of the 10-year period of study. In the second, South African case study, significant spaces for social learning and innovation in integrated water resources management were opened up over a five year period but closed down again, primarily as the result of lack of policy support by national government. The third, Italian, case study was designed to assess options for adapting to climate change by opening up new learning spaces between researchers, stakeholders and policy makers. A case for investing in local level systemic innovation through social-learning praxis design approaches and in learning processes around well contextualised case-studies is supported. However, concomitant investment by policy makers in social learning as an alternative, but complementary, governance mechanism for systemic innovation for SD is needed."
Aware that participation, then social learning as processes could be designed and conducted effectively but were not being institutionalised, Ison turned his attention to the purposeful design of conducive contexts for enacting social learning. Following a partial relocation to Monash University (Melbourne, Australia from 2008 to 2015) Ison created and led till 2015 the Systemic Governance Research Program (SGRP). From the Monash base his research expanded to look more closely at organisational and institutional constraints and possibilities for social learning with STiP in the Murray-Darling Basin Authority$^{58}$, the Victorian Department of Primary Industries$^{59}$, with the Victorian Climate Change Adaptation Research Program$^{60}$ and in seeking to foster water sensitive cities in Australia.$^{61}$
Ison's main contributions in this phase can be understood in terms of his developmental research into, and enactment of, a repertoire of STiP praxis forms.$^{62}$ His research has contributed to:
* refinement of 'systemic inquiry or co-inquiry' as a systemic practice (building on earlier work by Churchman and Checkland) and its framing as an institution suited for systemic governing by creating a means of engaging with situations of uncertainty and complexity, thus overcoming the limitations of the institution 'project' which creates our 'projectified world' e.g. the Climate Change Adaptation and Water Governance: Reconciling Food security, Renewable Energy and the provision of multiple ecosystems services (CADWAGO) project;$^{63}$
* the design and enactment of 'mediating' organisations and institutions better able to operate between the arms of vertical and horizontal governance in sustaining viable human-nature relations e.g. the RESILIM-O Project concerned with 'governing' the Olifants River catchment in South Africa, or the DFAT/CSIRO funded 'Learning Project' as part of the Food System Innovation for Food Security (FSIFS) initiative established in May 2012 to investigate the effective application of science and evidence-based approaches to the development, implementation and evaluation of food security interventions with particular emphasis on the Australian Development Assistance program, including in sub-Saharan Africa. $^{64}$ $^{65}$ $^{66}$ $^{67}$
* conceptual-metaphor-theory-based praxis though the use of metaphor impact assessment in public policy development (see doctoral research by McClintock$^{68}$ and Helme$^{69}$ and publications$^{70}$ $^{71}$ $^{72}$);
* social theories of learning and the purposeful fostering of communities of practice$^{73}$
* institutional analysis and redesign , especially regarding systemic affordances$^{74}$ $^{75}$ and what Ison calls deframing, framing and reframing praxis as part of systemic governance $^{76}$ $^{77}$
* scenarioing praxis within systemic governing $^{78}$;
* systemic evaluation as a key praxis within systemic governing $^{79}$;
* being transdisciplinary through STiP $^{80}$;
* building synergies between systemic governing and deliberative policy analysis$^{81}$
1. Further curriculum renewal and STiP capability development
Development began in 2008 of the first Systems PG (post-graduate) program at the Open University. The Masters program in Systems Thinking in Practice was launched in 2010 and has continued to run successfully since that time. About 1100 mature age students successfully completed the core modules (TU811 Thinking strategically: systems tools for managing change and TU812 Managing systemic change: inquiry, action and interaction) from 2010 to 2020.$^{82}$ In 2020 these modules were replaced by TB871 Making strategy with systems thinking in practice and TB872 Managing change with systems thinking in practice. Four purpose written books support this program (co-published with Springer) as do new animations and videos to support student learning. Taster material is available for free from OpenLearn.
From 2010 Ison has contributed to the activities of the Applied Systems Thinking in Practice (ASTiP) Group, including fostering an initiative to create a LEVEL 7 (Masters) Apprenticeship for the Systems Thinking Practitioner based on the UK (England) Apprenticeship Levy (2020).
Ison, with colleagues Blackmore and Sriskandarajah, have developed an innovative Systemic Inquiry (SI) model for capability development in 'Systems Approaches to PhD Research' connected to conferences of the ISSS (International Society for the Systems Sciences) and the IFSA (European Division of the International Farming Systems Research Association). This initiative draws heavily on their 'teaching' scholarship drawing in experiences from Hawkesbury and the OU. By 2021 seven successful programs had been conducted (Denmark, 2 x Germany, UK, Austria, USA x2) with 140 participating PhD students. Based on these experiences Ison was invited in 2018 to design and conduct a summer school for 28 PhD students of the Chinese Academy of Sciences University, Beijing. This 'learning system' innovation is now designed into all ISSS and IFSA conferences.
As President of ISSS, the International Society for the Systems Sciences (2014–15), Ison organised and ran (with Louis Klein) a successful conference (250 participants), edited (with Monica Shelley) a special issue of Systems Research & Behavioural Science, gained funding for a unique event and delivered two keynote addresses under the aegis of 'Governing the Anthropocene'. Through collaboration with water governance researchers then at Humbolt University, Berlin (and a Visiting Professorship) Ison secured funding from the VWStiftung (c. €150k) to bring together 100 scholars plus 30 PhD students in systems, cybernetics and institutional economics from around the world in a novel 'systemic inquiry' held at Schloss Herrenhausen, Hannover. This was the first ever joint meeting of systems and institutional economics scholars and the first 'systemic inquiry' funded by the VWStiftung. A major report and web-resource were developed.
2. Expansion from social learning to systemic governance
Governance, or more strictly, governing, is a cybersystemic concept$^{83}$ that involves operationalising feedback to take corrective action related to system purpose. In 'The Hidden Power of Systems Thinking. Governance in a Climate Emergency' (with Ed Straw, March 2020) Ison achieves a synthesis of his research and OU experience of educating systems thinkers to address perhaps the most compelling issue of our times, viz. how to govern in a climate emergency. Their thesis is that we humans are maintaining a governance infrastructure with modes of thinking and practice that are no longer fit for purpose. Six of their 13 chapters are devoted to how to use systems thinking for governing in response to the Anthropocene.
Ison argues that to govern effectively we must know what it is that we seek to govern i.e., to appreciate how best to frame our situation(s). His work argues against most contemporary framing choices contending that it is not the Earth we seek to save nor a river catchment (or a social-ecological system etc) but a viable, healthy, ongoing co-evolutionary dynamic between humans and the biosphere in manifest, localised and situated ways.$^{84}$ His research draws on work originally conceived, but not pursued, by Richard Norgaard in his 1994 book Development Betrayed: The End of Progress and a Coevolutionary Revisioning of the Future.
Building research evidence for investing in systemic governance
Much of Ison's research has been successfully applied and extended in a Victorian project to address the persistently failing governance of what in Australia is called 'NRM' (natural resources management). Originally funded by Charles Sturt University and the Helen Macpherson Smith Trust the project built a community of practice among a network of local, regional, state and federal natural resource managers and policy-makers who engaged in systemic co-inquiry, jointly generating a number of emergent themes worthy of on-going investigation. Each theme was given seed funding by DELWP and at least one has evolved into a self-organising autonomous organisation mediating relations between urban Victorians and their environment.$^{85}$ Gardens for Wildlife Victoria is an outcome and an initiative that continues to grow throughout the State.

## Leadership/Memberships of scientific societies

2021+ Advisory Council Member, UK Cybernetics Society -
2018 + President of the International Federation for Systems Research (IFSR).
2017 + Member of the Scientific Council of the Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science (BCSSS); elected to Management Board of the BCSSS (2018).
2016 - 2018 Vice President, International Federation for Systems Research (IFSR)
2008 - 2018 Trustee, Chair of Trustees (from 2016), American Society for Cybernetics
2013 - 2015 President Elect & President (2014–15) International Society for the Systems Sciences (ISSS)
2011 + Director, World Organisation of Systems and Cybernetics (WOSC).

## Commissions of trust

2018 + Director of the Systemic Change Lab of the European School of Governance, Berlin
2017 Reviewer of EPSRC Complexity Science Programs, Swindon, UK (April)
2014 + External Scientific Advisory Committee member, The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre (TAPPC), Sydney, Australia; a A$23 million NHMRC-funded Partnership Centre focusing on research on systems perspectives on the prevention of lifestyle-related chronic diseases.
2012 – 2020 International Reference Group member, US$8 million USAID-funded RESILIM Project on Water Governance in South Africa (Building improved transboundary governance and management of the Olifants Catchment of the Limpopo Basin for enhanced resiliency of its people and ecosystems to environmental change through systemic and participatory approaches).
2011 Member, Australian Water Culture Delegation to China (8 -15 October); Aust. - China Council, Dept., Foreign Affairs & Trade, Australia: Linking Australia and China: a "Bridge of Water Culture" project.
2010 Member Expert Panel Reviewing the €22 million EU Sixth Framework SWITCH (Sustainable Water Management in the City of the Future) Project, Brussels (July).
2009 + Advisory Board, Centre for Resources, Energy & Environ. Law (CREEL), University of Melb.
2008 + Adjunct Professor, Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology, Sydney
2008 + International member, Review of the National Urban Water Governance Program (NUWGP), School of Geography and Environmental Science, Monash University, Australia (October).
2007 - 2008 International Panel Member, Review of the Institute of Environmental Studies, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia.
2008 - 2018 Director, the Systemic Development Institute, Australia (with Richard Bawden and Roger Packham).
2000 -2006 Research Program Committee Member, WWF (UK) Ltd, Surrey UK
2000 - 2005 Management Board Member, The Natural Step (UK) Ltd.
2006 - 2008 Visiting Professor, Melbourne Water Research Centre (later Uniwater), University of Melbourne.

## Selected publications
### Books

* With Straw, Ed The Hidden Power of Systems Thinking. Routledge, 2020.
* Systems Practice: How to Act in a Climate Change World. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.
* With Russell, David. Agricultural extension and rural development: breaking out of knowledge transfer traditions. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
* With Pearson, Craig J. Agronomy of grassland systems. Cambridge University Press, 1997.

### Articles

Selected articles:
* With Ray, Niels Röling, and Drennan Watson. "Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning." Environmental Science & Policy 10.6 (2007): pp. 499–511.
* With Collins, Kevin. "Jumping off Arnstein's ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation." Environmental Policy and Governance 19.6 (2009): pp. 358–373.
* With Russell, David Fruits of Gregory Bateson's epistemological crisis: embodied mind-making and interactive experience in research and professional praxis. Canadian Journal of Communication, 42(3) (2017): pp. 485–514.