# 2012 Maryland Question 6

Elections in Maryland :
Federal government
Presidential elections
1788–89
1792
1796
1800
1804
1808
1812
1816
1820
1824
1828
1832
1836
1840
1844
1848
1852
1856
1860
1864
1868
1872
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Presidential primaries
Democratic
2000
2004
2008
2016
2020
2024
Republican
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
U.S. Senate elections
1788
1790
1791
1793
1793 sp
1795
1796
1796 sp
1797 sp
1800 sp
1801 sp
1802
1806
1806 sp
1808
1809
1813 sp
1816 sp
1819
1819 sp
1821
1822 sp
1825
1826 sp
1827
1831
1833
1835 sp
1836 sp
1837
1838 sp
1839
1839 sp
1841 sp
1843
1849
1850 sp
1851
1855
1861
1864 sp
1865 sp
1868 sp
1874
1878
1880
1884
1886
1890
1892
1892 sp
1896
1898
1902
1904
1908
1908 sp
1910
1913 sp
1916
1914
1920
1922
1928
1926
1932
1934
1938
1940
1944
1946
1950
1952
1956
1958
1962
1964
1968
1970
1974
1976
1980
1982
1986
1988
1992
1994
1998
2000
2004
2006
2010
2012
2016
2018
2022
2024
U.S. House of Representatives elections
1789
1790
1791
3rd sp
1792
1793
2nd sp
1794
2nd sp
3rd sp
1796
2nd sp
3rd sp
1798
7th sp
1801
1802
2nd sp
1803
1804
4th sp
1806
7th sp
1808
1810
4th sp
7th sp
1811
6th sp
1812
1814
1816
3rd sp
5th sp
1818
1820
1822
1823
5th sp
1824
1826
2nd sp
1829
1831
1832
6th sp
1833
1834
1st sp
1835
1837
1839
1841
1843
1844
1845
1847
1849
1851
1853
1855
1857
1859
1861
1863
1864
1866
1868
1870
1872
1874
1876
1878
1880
1882
1884
1886
1888
1890
1892
1st sp
1894
1st sp
5th sp
1896
1898
1900
1st sp
1902
1904
1906
1908
1910
1912
1913
3rd sp
1914
1st sp
1916
1918
2nd sp
1920
1922
1924
5th sp
1926
1928
1930
1932
4th sp
1934
1936
1938
1939
1st sp
5th sp
1940
1941
6th sp
1942
1944
1946
1947
3rd sp
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1971
1st sp
1972
1973
1st sp
1974
1976
1978
1980
1981
5th sp
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
7th sp
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
4th sp
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
7th sp
2022
2024
6th :
State government
General elections
2006
2010
2020
2022
2024
Gubernatorial elections
1838
1841
1844
1847
1850
1853
1857
1861
1864
1867
1871
1875
1879
1883
1887
1891
1895
1899
1903
1907
1911
1915
1919
1923
1926
1930
1934
1938
1942
1946
1950
1954
1958
1962
1966
1969 sp
1970
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
Attorney General elections
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
Comptroller elections
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
Senate elections
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
House of Delegates elections
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022 :
County government
County executive elections
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
2025 sp
County offices
2006
2010
2018
2022 :
Ballot measures
1992
Question 6
2012
Question 4
Question 6
2022
Question 4
2024
Question 1 :
Annapolis
Mayoral elections
2017
2021
2025 :
Baltimore
Mayoral elections
1899
1903
1907
1911
1915
1919
1923
1927
1931
1935
1939
1943
1947
1951
1955
1959
1963
1967
1971
1975
1979
1983
1987
1991
1995
1999
2003–04
2007
2011
2016
2020
2024
Ballot measures
Question P :
Government :
vte :
Question 6 (colloquially called the Maryland same-sex marriage referendum) is a referendum that appeared on the general election ballot for the U.S. state of Maryland to allow voters to approve or reject the Civil Marriage Protection Act—a bill legalizing same-sex marriage passed by the General Assembly in 2012. The referendum was approved by 52.4% of voters on November 6, 2012, and thereafter went into effect on January 1, 2013.

## Ballot measure

The ballot measure read as follows:
   Question 6 Civil Marriage Protection Act
   Establishes that Maryland's civil marriage laws allow gay and lesbian couples to obtain a civil marriage license, provided they are not otherwise prohibited from marrying; protects clergy from having to perform any particular marriage ceremony in violation of their religious beliefs; affirms that each religious faith has exclusive control over its own theological doctrine regarding who may marry within that faith; and provides that religious organizations and certain related entities are not required to provide goods, services, or benefits to an individual related to the celebration or promotion of marriage in violation of their religious beliefs.
The choices read as follows:
   For the Referred Law Against the Referred Law

## History

The Civil Marriage Protection Act was passed by the Maryland General Assembly in February 2012 and signed on March 1, 2012, by Governor Martin O'Malley. The Maryland House of Delegates approved the bill by a 72–67 vote, and the Maryland Senate approved the bill by a vote of 25–22. Sections 2, 3 and 4 of the bill were included to ensure that religious leaders, religiously controlled institutions, and their programs are legally protected from being required to officiate or provide facilities for a same-sex marriage or couple if they refuse.
Opponents of same-sex marriage announced the launch of the petition drive for the referendum two weeks later. "The General Assembly and the governor do not have the final word on marriage in Maryland," said Derek McCoy, executive director of Maryland Marriage Alliance. "The people do." Petitioners submitted more than twice the number of required signatures to place the referendum on the election ballot, and in June, the State Board of Elections announced that enough were validated.

## Support and opposition

Support for Question 6 consisted of a coalition of civil rights leaders, clergy, businesses, partners, and politicians known as Marylanders for Marriage Equality. The opposition to Question 6 consisted of religious figures and politicians known as the Maryland Marriage Alliance.
Governor Martin O'Malley, a Catholic, led the 2012 campaign for same-sex marriage in Maryland. O'Malley said he concluded that "discriminating against individuals based on their sexual orientation in the context of civil marital rights is unjust" and "treating the children of families headed by same-sex couples with lesser protections under the law than the children of families headed by heterosexual parents, is also unjust."
Arguments supporting Question 6 included protecting the children of gay and lesbian couples by affording their parents equal rights under the law, improving quality of life, principles of fairness, civil equality, and highlighting religious protections. Arguments in opposition to Question 6 included protecting children from being taught same-sex marriage in public schools with a focus on "boys can marry boys", preserving parental rights, a traditional definition of marriage as between one man and one woman, and protecting religious beliefs. An official at Gallaudet University, Angela McCaskill, used as an example of religious persecution in a political ad opposing same-sex marriage, opted to have herself removed because it was misleading. McCaskill, who was fired after the university learned that she signed the petition in opposition of Question 6, said she signed solely "because she believed the matter should be voted on." Her personal views on same-sex marriage were unknown. Religious officials, as well as supporters of same-sex marriage rallied for McCaskill and called for her reinstatement, stating that she should not be penalized for her personal views. Several dozen small employers in the state have said that same-sex marriage will be good for business, helping to attract and retain talent.

### Fundraising

Advocates for Question 6 raised a total of approximately $4.1 million: contributions from the organizations and individuals under Marylanders for Marriage Equality (78.5%), Human Rights Campaign's National Marriage Fund and Maryland Families PAC (14.2%), NAACP's National Voter Fund for Question 6 (5.8%), Freedom to Marry's Maryland PAC (0.9%), and Maryland for All Families (0.1%). Opponents of Question 6 raised a total of approximately $1.7 million: contributions from the organizations and individuals under Maryland Marriage Alliance, National Organization for Marriage (75%), and the Knights of Columbus (14.7%).
Notable Supporters
* President Barack Obama
* Former President Bill Clinton
* Former Vice President Dick Cheney
* Terry McAuliffe, former chairman of the DNC
* Ken Mehlman, former chairman of the RNC
* Julian Bond, former chairman of the NAACP, civil rights activist
* Al Sharpton, civil rights activist
* Delman Coates of Mount Ennon Baptist Church
* Donte Hickman Sr. of Southern Baptist Church
* Brendon Ayanbadejo, linebacker for the Baltimore Ravens
* 1119SEIU
* AFL–CIO
* Equality Maryland
* Human Rights Campaign
* ACLU of Maryland
* Maryland State Education Association
* NAACP of Baltimore
* PayPal
* Calvert Investments
* Nike, Inc.
* Nordstrom
Notable Opponents
* Edwin Frederick O'Brien, former Archbishop of Baltimore
* Derek McCoy of Maryland Marriage Alliance
* Tony Perkins of Family Research Council
* Harry R. Jackson, Jr. of Hope Christian Church
* Brian Brown of National Organization for Marriage
* Delegate Don Dwyer
* Delegate Emmett C. Burns, Jr.

## Opinion polls

Public opinion surveys have reported those in favor of same-sex marriage and those opposed.
| Date of opinion poll | Conducted by | Sample size | In favor | Opposed | Undecided | Margin of Error |
| January 9–15, 2012 | Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies | 808 | 49% | 47% | 4% | ±3.5% |
| January 23–26, 2012 | The Washington Post | 1,064 | 50% | 44% | 6% | ±3.5% |
| March 5–7, 2012 | Public Policy Polling | 600 | 52% | 44% | 4% | ±3.5% |
| March 16–19, 2012 | OpinionWorks | 601 | 40% | 43% | 16% | ±4% |
| May 14–21, 2012 | Public Policy Polling | 852 | 57% | 37% | 6% | ±3.5% |
| July 24–28, 2012 | Hart Research Associates | 504 | 54% | 40% | 6% | ±4.5% |
| September 17–23, 2012 | Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies | 813 | 51% | 43% | 6% | ±3.5% |
| September 25–27, 2012 | OpinionWorks | 804 | 49% | 39% | 12% | ±3.5% |
| October 11–15, 2012 | The Washington Post | 843 | 52% | 43% | 5% | ±4% |
| October 20–23, 2012 | OpinionWorks | 801 | 46% | 47% | 6% | ±3.5% |
| October 21–25, 2012 | Sarah T. Hughes Field Politics Center at Goucher College | 667 | 55.4% | 39.2% | 5.4% | ±3.79% |

## Results

On November 6, 2012, the measure was approved by 52.4% of voters. In a statement regarding the election results, Governor Martin O'Malley said "Whether your parents happen to be gay or straight, Democratic, Republican or Independent, your families are equal before the eyes of the law." The leading opposition group said that "No matter how it turns out, there have been thousands of people who are engaged in the process." On November 29, 2012, Attorney General Doug Gansler issued a legal opinion stating that court clerks could begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples once the governor certified the election results on December 6, 2012, though they would not become effective until January 1, 2013. 21 out of the 24 counties in Maryland chose to issue the licenses ahead of schedule.
An exit poll conducted by AP and Edison Research found:
* 7 in 10 young voters, age 29 and under, voted in favor of same-sex marriage.
* Almost 6 in 10 of those age 30 to 44 voted in favor of same-sex marriage.
* Nearly two-thirds of women with children voted in favor of same sex marriage.
* Those over age 45 slightly voted against same-sex marriage.
* Nearly two-thirds of those age 65 and older voted against same-sex marriage.

### County breakdown

Breakdown of voting by county :
| County | Yes | Votes | No | Votes |
| Montgomery | 65.8% | 289,625 | 34.2% | 150,498 |
| Howard | 59.2% | 88,768 | 40.8% | 61,139 |
| Baltimore City | 57.2% | 138,007 | 42.8% | 103,294 |
| Anne Arundel | 52.4% | 133,053 | 47.6% | 120,883 |
| Baltimore County | 51.7% | 194,150 | 48.3% | 181,162 |
| Frederick | 51% | 58,349 | 49% | 55,952 |
| Prince George's | 49.6% | 183,257 | 50.4% | 186,296 |
| Kent | 49.1% | 4,685 | 50.9% | 4,856 |
| Talbot | 48.2% | 9,567 | 51.8% | 10,290 |
| Calvert | 45.8% | 20,205 | 54.2% | 23,944 |
| Charles | 45.6% | 33,334 | 54.4% | 39,792 |
| Harford | 44.5% | 55,057 | 55.5% | 68,785 |
| Cecil | 44.3% | 18,279 | 55.7% | 22,993 |
| Queen Anne's | 44.2% | 10,788 | 55.8% | 13,609 |
| Saint Mary's | 44.2% | 20,606 | 55.8% | 25,971 |
| Carroll | 43.8% | 37,631 | 56.2% | 48,253 |
| Worcester | 42.2% | 11,096 | 57.8% | 15,212 |
| Wicomico | 39.8% | 16,107 | 60.2% | 24,405 |
| Washington | 38.8% | 23,585 | 61.2% | 37,246 |
| Dorchester | 38.7% | 5,645 | 61.3% | 8,943 |
| Caroline | 37% | 4,785 | 63% | 8,139 |
| Somerset | 35.7% | 3,467 | 64.3% | 6,244 |
| Allegany | 34.5% | 9,965 | 65.5% | 18,927 |
| Garrett | 27.5% | 3,493 | 72.5% | 9,212 |