# *Kóryos

The Männerbund (German: 'alliance of men') refers to the theoretical Proto-Indo-European brotherhood of warriors in which unmarried young males served for several years, as a rite of passage into manhood, before their full integration into society.
Scholars such as Kim McCone and Gerhard Meiser have theorized the existence of the Männerbund based on later Indo-European traditions and myths that feature links between landless young males, perceived as an age-class not yet fully integrated into the community of the married men; their service in war-bands sent away for part of the year in the wild, then defending the host society for the rest of the year; their mystical self-identification with wolves and dogs as symbols of death, lawlessness, and warrior fury; and the idea of a liminality between vulnerability and death on one side, and youth and adulthood on the other side.

## Name and etymology
### Terminology

In Indo-European studies, the modern German term Männerbund [de] (literally 'alliance of men') have been traditionally used to refer to the concept. The term was first coined by German academics in the early 20th century to refer to a type of war-band among the Germanic peoples, and later adopted by international scholars to describe similar groups in other cultures, particularly within Indo-European traditions.
Some writers, including Harry Falk, Jan N. Bremmer and Stefan Zimmer, argue that it can be misleading since these war-bands were made up of adolescent males, not grown-up men. Other terms like Bruderschaft ('fraternity, brotherhood'), Jugendbünde ('youth group') or Jungmannschaft ('young [group of] men') or have been proposed as preferable alternatives.

### Reconstructed noun

The reconstructed Proto-Indo-European (PIE) term *kóryos denotes a 'people under arms' and has been translated as 'army, war-band, unit of warriors', or as 'detachment, war party'. Although the word is attested in several branches of the Indo-European languages, its connection to the idea of an Indo-European Männerbund remains uncertain. In the words of scholar J. P. Mallory, the latter concept "does at least occasionally intersect with the lexical evidence of the *koros ~ *koryos".
The term *kóryos stems from the PIE noun *kóro- 'cutting, section, division', attested in Old Persian as kāra 'people, army' (Persian: کاروان, romanized: kārāvan, lit. 'troupe') and in Lithuanian as kãras 'war, army'. It has descendant cognates in the Baltic *kāryas 'army', Celtic *koryos 'troop, tribe', and Germanic *harjaz 'host, troop, army, raiding party'. In west-central Indo-European dialects, the designation *koryonos, meaning 'leader of the *kóryos' (here attached to the suffix -nos 'master of'), is also attested: Ancient Greek koíranos 'army-leader', Old Norse Herjan (< PGmc *harjanaz 'army-leader'), and Brittonic Coriono-totae 'people of the army-leader'. Other possible cognates may be found in Italic languages (the personal name Conolanus and the town ot Corioli).
The Gallic tribes Uo-corri ('two-armies'), Tri-corii ('three-armies') and Petru-corii ('four-armies') were presumably formed from alliances of roving war-bands. The noun *harja- is also part of compound names in Germanic languages, such as Herigast (Heregast), possibly attested as Harikast on the Negau helmet. Some toponyms in Western Europe, such as Cherbourg in France or Heerlen in the Netherlands, may stem from historical ethnic groups whose name contained the Celtic noun *koryo- 'army, troop', as proposed by Pierre-Yves Lambert. The Asturian personal name Vacoria (similar to Gaulish Vocorius) has been interpreted as stemming from the Celtic ethnic name *(d)uo-korio 'possessing two armies', and the Gallic tribal name Coriosolites as meaning 'those who watch over the troop', or 'those who purchase soldiers or mercenaries'. Ancient paleo-Hispanic onomastics also attest the noun, albeit in the form *koro, with the same meaning.

## Historiography
### Invention of the concept

The concept of the Männerbund was developed in the early 20th century by scholars such as Heinrich Schurtz (1902), Hans Blüher (1917), Lily Weiser-Aall (1927), Georges Dumézil (1929), Richard Wolfram (1932), Robert Stumpfl (1934), Otto Höfler (1934), Stig Wikander (1938), and Henri Jeanmaire [fr] (1939).
These theories influenced German Völkisch movements in the period 1900–1920s, then Nazi circles during the 1930–1940s. Scholarship from the later part of the 20th century has pointed out the far-right ideological foundations of most of the earlier works, but has also yielded new evidence supporting the existence of brotherhoods of warriors in Vendel Period Scandinavia.
The theory has been extensively discussed in Indo-European studies. Scholar Touraj Daryaee notes that "a substantial amount of work has been published on the Indo-European Männerbund". The standard comparative overview of the subject is Kim McCone's Hund, Wolf und Krieger bei den Indogermanen, published in 1987.

### Support and criticism

On the basis of ethnographic evidence, scholar Gerhard Meiser has proposed the following basic characteristics of the (Proto-)Indo-European Männerbund: war bands of young males organized into age-based cohorts, typically including prominent youths and primarily focused on military duties. These groups often live apart from society, both in terms of location (residing in wild or remote areas) and in terms of behaviours (exhibiting behaviours that are not considered antisocial as long as they do not target the host community). Members typically wear animal hides or are partially nude, frequently associating with wolves through their attire, behavior, and names. Dark colors are prevalent in their symbolism, and there is a strong connection to death, reflecting the role of wolves in their religious beliefs and their liminal status.
Scholar Kim McCone suggests that there is "sufficient lexical and certainly structural correspondences to reconstruct a PIE ‘war-band’ comprising an age set of young unmarried and landless (but free) men who lived off the land, engaged in predatory activities, had a particular association with wolves (less so, dogs or bears), were famous for their berserkr-like behavior in battle, and might form the 'shock troops' in military engagements".
However, critics such as Stefan Zimmer are skeptical of efforts to reconstruct a unified system from diverse sources spanning different time periods. He argues that the sources used to reconstructed the Männerbund appear to describe various distinct institutions, all loosely connected to the general concept of a "war band". According to Zimmer, such groups "may well have been part of [Proto-Indo-European] social life, and may be postulated with good reason, but this assumption can in no way be considered probable, as the sources simply are insufficient to bear the weight of argument needed".
According to J. P. Mallory, "on the basis of Celtic-Germanic comparisons, one can posit the specific institution of the war-band in at least the western periphery of the Indo-European world. To what extent it may be ascribed to a broader region or an earlier antiquity in Indo-European depends on what further evidence can be adduced. The existence of cognate terms in Baltic, Greek and Iranian would at least indicate that the [word] *korios itself is of Proto-Indo-European antiquity".

## Cultural reconstruction
### Rite of passage

In documented Indo-European cultures used to reconstruct the Männerbund concept, the war bands were generally composed of adolescent males, usually coming from prominent families and initiated together into manhood as an age-class cohort. After undergoing painful trials to enter the group, they were sent away to live as landless warriors in the wild for a number of years, within a group ranging from two to twelve members. The young males went without possession other than their weapons, living on the edges of their host society.
Social behaviour normally forbidden, such as stealing, raiding, or sexually assaulting women, were therefore tolerated amongst Männerbund members, as long as the malevolent acts were not directed at the host society. Their activities were seasonal, and they lived with their home community for a part of the year. Their life was centered on military duties, hunting wild animals and pillaging settlements on one side; and on the recitation of heroic poetry telling the deeds of past heroes and cattle theft legends on the other side.
A tradition of epic poetry celebrating heroic and violent warriors conquering loot and territories, which were portrayed as possessions the gods wanted them to have, probably participated in the validation of violence among the Männerbund. The leader of the band, the *koryonos, was determined with a game of dice, and the result accepted as the gods' choice. The other members pledged to die for him, and to kill for him. He was regarded as their master in the rite of passage, but also as their 'employer' since the young warriors served as his bodyguards and protectors.
The period of initiation within the Männerbund was perceived as a transitional stage preceding the status of adult warrior and was usually crowned by marriage. The Männerbund were symbolically associated with death and liminality, but also with fecundity and sexual license. Kim McCone has argued that members of the Männerbund initially served as young unmarried males without possessions before their eventual incorporation into the *tewtéh$_2$- ('the tribe, people under arms'), composed of the property-owning and married adult males.
According to David W. Anthony and Dorcas R. Brown, the Männerbund may have served "as an organization promoting group cohesion and effectiveness in combat, as an instrument of external territorial expansion, and as a regulatory device in chiefly feast-centred economies."
In Europe, those oath-bound initiatory war-bands were eventually absorbed by increasingly powerful patrons and kings during the Iron Age, while they were downgraded in ancient India with the rise of the Brahmin caste, leading to their progressive demise.

### Role in the Indo-European migrations

Scholars have argued that the institution of the Männerbund played a key role during the Indo-European migrations and the diffusion of Indo-European languages across most of western Eurasia. Raids headed by those young warriors could have led to the establishment of new settlements on foreign lands, preparing the ground for the larger migration of whole tribes including old men, women and children. This scenario is supported by archaeological data from the early Single Grave–Corded Ware Culture in Jutland, where 90 per cent of all burials belonged to males in what appears to be a 'colonial' expansion on the territory of the Funnelbeaker culture.
The Männerbund probably drove people not protected by the Indo-European social umbrella to move under it in order to obtain safety or restitution from thieving and raiding. They could therefore have served as an incentive for the recruitment of outsiders into social positions that offered vertical mobility, horizontal reciprocity, and the possibility of immortality through praise poetry, made more attractive by generosity at patron-sponsored public feasts.

### Wolf-like behaviour

The reconstructed war-bands consisted of shape-shifting warriors, in a symbolic and metaphorical sense, wearing animal skins to assume the nature of wolves or dogs. Members of the Männerbund adopted wolfish behaviours and bore names containing the word 'wolf' or 'dog', each a symbol of death and the Otherworld in Indo-European belief. The idealized attributes of the Männerbund were borrowed from the imagery surrounding the wolf: violence, trickery, swiftness, great strength, and warrior fury.
By identifying with the wild animals, Männerbund members perceived themselves as physically and legally moved outside the human world, and therefore no longer restrained by human taboos. When returning to their normal life, they would feel no remorse for breaking the rules of their home society, because they had not been humans or at least were not living in the cultural space of the host society when those rules were broken.

### Warrior-fury

The conflicting opposition between death and vulnerability is suggested by the attributes generally associated with the Männerbund: great strength, resistance to pain, and lack of fear. The typical state of warrior fury or frenzy was supposed to increase his strength above natural expectations, with ecstatic performances accentuated by dances and perhaps by the use of drugs. The Indo-European term for a 'mad attack' (*eis) is common to the Vedic, Germanic, and Iranian traditions.
The Germanic berserkers were depicted as practitioners of the battle fury ('going berserk', berserksgangr). The martial fury of the Ancient Greek warrior was called lyssa, a derivation of lykos ('wolf'), as if the soldiers temporarily become wolves in their mad rage.
As such, young males were perceived as dangers even to their host society. The Maruts, a group of storm deities of the Vedic tradition, were depicted as both beneficial and dangerous entities. The Irish hero Cúchulainn becomes a terrorizing figure among the inhabitants of the capital-city, Emain Macha, after he beheaded three rivals from his own people, the Ulaid. Aiming to appease his fury, they decide to capture him and plunge his body into basins of water in order to 'cool him down'. Irish sources also describe some of the warrior-bands as savages (díberg), living like wolves by pillaging and massacring. Similarly, some Greek warrior-bands were called hybristḗs (ὑβριστή) and portrayed as violent and insolent groups of ransomers and looters.

### Nudity

Many kurgan stelae found in the Pontic–Caspian steppe, which are associated with the Proto-Indo-European culture, depict a naked male warrior carved on the stone with little else than a belt and his weapons. In later Indo-European traditions, Männerbund raiders likewise wore a belt that bound them to their leader and the gods, and little else.
In Ancient Greek and Roman literary sources, Germanic and Celtic peoples were often portrayed as fighting naked or semi naked, armed only with light weapons. At the battle of Telamon (225 BC), Gallic warriors reportedly wore only trousers and capes. In the Norse tradition, Berserker usually scorned the use of armour to favour animal skins, and they were sometimes also said to fight naked. Ancient Italic tribes had in their ranks berserk-like warriors who fought naked, barefoot, flowing-haired, and often in single combat. Similarly, young Vedic boys wore only a belt and an animal skin during their initiation within the Männerbund.
Celtiberian statuettes from the 5th–3rd centuries BC depict naked warriors with a sword, a small round shield (caetra), a "power belt", and sometimes a helmet. The tradition of kurgan stelae featuring warriors with a belt is also common in the Scythian cultures. According to military historian Michael P. Speidel, the scene 36 of Trajan's Column, which shows bare-chested, bare-footed young men wearing only a shield, could be a depiction of Germanic berserkers.

### Darkness

The Männerbund is usually associated with the colour black, or at least dark, and with the mobilization of chthonic forces. Frequent references are made to the "black earth" or the "dark night" in the Indo-European literature, and hunting and fighting at night appears to have been one of the distinguishing characteristics of the Männerbund.
In the Vedic tradition, the followers of Indra and Rudra wore black clothes, and the young heroes of Medieval Armenia were called "black youths" (t'ux manuks). The "black" Aram is the idealized figure of the Männerbund leader in Armenian myths, and his armies are said to suddenly attack adversaries "before dawn" in the borderlands of Armenia.
The Athenian ephebes traditionally wore a black chlamys, and the Ancient Greek tradition featured an initiation ritual imposed upon young males in which "black hunters" were sent out to the frontier to perform military exploits. The Greek model of the black hunter, Meleager, is named after the word for "black" (melas), and the Armenian name Aram stems from the root *rē-mo- ('dirt, soot').
The Roman historian Tacitus (1st c. AD) mentions the Germanic Harii, whose name could derive from *kóryos, as "savages" wearing black shields, dyeing their bodies, and choosing dark nights for battle. Kershaw has proposed that the Harii were the Männerbund of the neighbouring Lugii tribe.

## Proposed attestations

Scholars have drawn on the following examples from documented Indo-European-speaking cultures to reconstruct the concept of the Männerbund. However, this approach has been criticized by other experts like Stefan Zimmer, who argues that the sources reference various distinct institutions from different time periods, all loosely connected to the general concept of a "war band".

### Indian tradition

Some Vedic families began initiating young boys at 8 years old, studying heroic poetry about past ancestors and practicing their hunting and fighting skills. At 16, they were initiated into a warrior band during the winter solstice ritual (the Ekāstakā), during which the boys went into an ecstatic state, then ritually died to be reborn as dogs of war. After their leader was determined by a dice game, the initiated youths were cast away in the wild for four years to live as dogs, stealing animals, women, goods and territory, until the summer solstice ended the raiding season.
The young warriors then returned to their forest residence where they held a Vrātyastoma sacrifice to thank the gods for their success. At the end the four-year initiation, a final Vrātyastoma sacrifice was performed to transform the dog-warrior into a responsible adult man. Then, the newly-initiated males destroyed their old clothes to become human once again, ready to return to their family and to live by the rules of their host community.
The Vrātyas ('dog-priests') were known for performing the Ekāstakā ceremony at the winter solstice, when Indra, the god of war, is said to have been born with his band of Maruts. The term Vrāta is used in particular the Rigveda to describe the Maruts.

### Greek tradition

In Ancient Greece, the traditional war-bands lost some of the frenzy attributes that characterize shape shifters in other Indo-European cultures, but they still maintained the terror-inspiring appearance and the tricky war tactics of the original Männerbund.
From 17 to 20 years old, the Athenian ephebos had to live during the 2 years in the ephebeia (ἐφηβεία). Relegated to the edges of society, they were given a marginal status without a full citizenship. Their duty was to guard the limit of their community during peaceful times, generally as guards of fields, forests, and orchards. Leading ambushes and skirmishes in war time, the ephebos wore black tunics and were lightly armed. An essential part of their training was the traditional hunt, conducted at night with the use of snares and traps. In the case of the Spartan krypteia, it was even a human hunt.

### Armenian tradition

The manuks ('young warriors') are mentioned in the story of the legendary founder of Armenia, Hayk. His descendant, Aram, interpreted as the "second image of Hayk", heads an army of 50,000 norati ('youths') warriors extending the borders of the territory on every side to create a new, superior Armenia. Contrary to Hayk, who is fighting his adversary within the territory of Armenia, Aram makes war in the borderlands and beyond the borders of Armenia. According to Armen Petrosyan, this suggests that the young warriors of Aram can be interpreted as a reflex of the Männerbund, while Hayk's soldiers may be the depiction of the adult men in arms.