# 2005 Texas Proposition 2

"none" is preferred when the title is sufficiently descriptive; see [[WP:SDNONE]]
Elections in Texas :
General elections
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024 :
Federal government
Presidential elections
1848
1852
1856
1860
1872
1876
1880
1884
1888
1892
1896
1900
1904
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932
1936
1940
1944
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Presidential primaries
Democratic
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Republican
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
U.S. Senate
1846
1847
1851
1853
1857
1859
1859 sp
1870
1871
1875
1876
1881
1882
1887
1888
1892 sp
1893
1894
1899
1901
1905
1907
1911
1913
1913 sp
1916
1918
1922
1924
1928
1930
1934
1936
1940
1941 sp
1942
1946
1948
1952
1954
1957 sp
1958
1960
1961 sp
1964
1966
1970
1972
1976
1978
1982
1984
1988
1990
1993 sp
1994
1996
2000
2002
2006
2008
2012
2014
2018
2020
2024
2026
U.S. House of Representatives
1846
1849
1851
1853
1855
1857
1859
1866
1869
1870
1871
1872
1874
1876
1878
1879
6th sp
1880
1882
1884
1886
1887
2nd sp
1888
1890
1892
9th sp
1894
1896
11th sp
1898
1900
1901
6th sp
1902
4th sp
1903
8th sp
1904
1905
8th sp
1906
1908
1910
1912
1913
10th sp
1914
1916
1918
1919
12th sp
1920
1922
13th sp
1924
1926
1928
1930
17th sp
1931
14th sp
1932
1933
7th sp
8th sp
15th sp
1934
1936
1937
10th sp
1938
1940
1942
1944
1946
6th sp
1947
9th sp
16th sp
1948
15th sp
1950
18th sp
1951
13th sp
1952
7th sp
1954
1956
1958
1960
1961
20th sp
1962
4th sp
13th sp
1963
10th sp
1964
1966
8th sp
1968
3rd sp
1970
1972
1974
1976
1st sp
22nd sp
1978
1980
1982
1983
6th sp
1984
1985
1st sp
1986
1988
1989
12th sp
18th sp
1990
1991
3rd sp
1992
1994
1996
1997
28th sp
1998
2000
2002
2003
19th sp
2004
2006
22nd
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
27th sp
2020
2021
6th sp
2022
34th sp
2024
18th sp :
State government
Gubernatorial elections
1845
1847
1849
1851
1853
1855
1857
1859
1861
1863
1866
1866
1869
1873
1876
1878
1880
1882
1884
1886
1888
1890
1892
1894
1896
1898
1900
1902
1904
1906
1908
1910
1912
1914
1916
1918
1920
1922
1924
1926
1928
1930
1932
1934
1936
1938
1940
1942
1944
1946
1948
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
2026
Lieutenant gubernatorial elections
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
Attorney General elections
2002
2006
2010
2014
2018
2022
Comptroller elections
2010
2014
2018
2022
Senate elections
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
House of Representatives elections
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024
Constitutional amendments
1972
2005
2007
2021
2023 :
Austin
Mayoral elections
2003
2006
2009
2012
2014
2018
2022
2024
Austin municipal elections
2022
2024 :
Corpus Christi
Mayoral elections
2012
2014
2016
2017 sp
2018
2020
2022
2024 :
Dallas–Fort Worth
Arlington mayoral elections
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
2021
2023
Dallas mayoral elections
1856
1857
1875
1904
1925
1961
1963
1965
1995
1999
2002 sp
2003
2007
2011
2015
2019
2023
Dallas municipal elections
2015
2019
2021
Fort Worth mayoral elections
2003
2007
2009
2011
2015
2017
2019
2021
2023
Denton mayoral elections
2020
2022
Plano municipal elections
2017
2019
2021 :
El Paso
Mayoral elections
2001
2003
2005
2009
2013
2017
2020
2024
Municipal elections
2017
2020
2024 :
Houston
Mayoral elections
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2019
2023
Municipal elections
2005
2007
2009 :
Laredo
Mayoral elections
2018
2022 :
Lubbock
Mayoral elections
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2024 :
San Antonio
Mayoral elections
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
2021
2023
2025 :
Government :
vte :
Proposition 2 was a referendum for a state constitutional amendment placed on the ballot by the Texas legislature and approved by the voters at the November 8, 2005 general election. The measure added a new provision to the Texas Constitution, Article 1, Section 32, which provides that "Marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman", and "This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage." Thus Texas became the 19th US state to adopt constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. It was the most populous state to adopt a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage until California passed its ban in November 2008. The amendment was later invalidated in June 2015 after the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage nationwide in the Obergefell v. Hodges decision, though the amendment remains in the Texas Constitution.

## Full text

Article 1, Section 32 of the Texas Constitution, as amended, states:
   (a) Marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman.
   (b) This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage.
The joint resolution proposing the amendment included additional language about rights that the ban on same-sex marriage was not meant to restrict:
   This state recognizes that through the designation of guardians, the appointment of agents, and the use of private contracts, persons may adequately and properly appoint guardians and arrange rights relating to hospital visitation, property, and the entitlement to proceeds of life insurance policies without the existence of any legal status identical or similar to marriage.

## Legislative approval

As provided in Article 17, Section 1 of the Texas Constitution, a proposed constitutional amendment is placed on the ballot only after the Texas legislature has proposed the amendment in a joint resolution of both the Texas senate and the Texas house of representatives. The joint resolution may originate in either chamber. The resolution must be adopted by a vote of at least two-thirds of the membership of each chamber. That means a minimum of 100 votes in the house and 21 votes in the senate.
On April 25, 2005, the house voted 101 in favor and 29 against the proposed amendment to ban same-sex marriage and civil unions, authored by Warren Chisum. On May 21, 2005, the senate voted 21 in favor and 8 against the proposed amendment, and the ballot was set for November 8.

## Campaign
### Campaign funding and spending

Proponents raised $122,000, almost all from two donors, and opponents $391,000 in support of their campaigns on the proposition.
Proposition 2 attracted nearly $1.3 million in contributions. Seven committees opposing the proposition raised $782,410, almost 55 percent more than the nearly $506,000 collected by nine committees supporting it. Four committees against the measure raised $774,440, or almost 99 percent of the money raised to fight Proposition 2.
| Ballot committee | Position | Total |
| Texans For Marriage | Pro | $339,880 |
| Heritage Alliance PAC | Pro | $67,903 |
| Focus on the Family Texas Marriage Amendment Committee | Pro | $51,188 |
| Reagan Legacy Republican Women | Pro | $16,857 |
| Texas Marriage Alliance | Pro | $10,175 |
| Vote Yes On Prop. Two | Pro | $5,500 |
| Conservative Republicans of Texas | Pro | $8,750 |
| Conservative Republicans of Harris County | Pro | $5,433 |
| Pro total | | $505,991 |
| No Nonsense in November | Con | $350,096 |
| Vote Against the Amendment | Con | $221,495 |
| No Nonsense in 2006 | Con | $125,157 |
| Save Texas Marriage | Con | $77,694 |
| Practice What You Preach | Con | $4,858 |
| Tarrant County Stonewall Democrats | Con | $1,740 |
| Texans United | Con | $1,369 |
| Con total | | $782,409 |
| Total | | $1,288,400 |
| Contributor | State | Industry | Position | Total |
| National Gay & Lesbian Task Force | Washington, DC | Gay Rights | Con | $111,979 |
| Bob J. Perry | Houston, Texas | Home Builders | Pro | $110,000 |
| Tim Gill | Denver, Colorado | Gay Rights | Con | $100,000 |
| James Leininger | San Antonio, Texas | Pharmaceuticals & Health Products | Pro | $100,000 |
| Vaquillas LLC | Laredo, Texas | Livestock | Pro | $100,000 |

#### Contributors across state lines

* The National Gay & Lesbian Task Force gave nearly $122,000. All but $10,000 went to one committee in Texas.
* Focus on the Family, a Colorado-based Christian organization led by Dr. James Dobson, gave almost $51,200 to a Texas committee it formed. Although the group's Kansas committee did not report any contributions, it did disclose expenditures of nearly $24,500, mostly on radio advertisements.
* The Human Rights Campaign, a national organization promoting equality for homosexuals, contributed $34,900 to oppose the Texas measure.

### Supporters

Supporters for the Proposition 2 (2005) were approximately 76% of the Texas voting population. Supporters claimed that marriage is a union between a man and a woman and these unions creates a child. The poll show at the time of the voting was approximately 82% in a public poll. The Texas Governor Rick Perry said at the time of the voting said, "Like the vast majority of Texans, I believe that marriage represents a sacred union between a man and a woman." Although his signature was irrelevant legally, Governor Rick Perry held a signing ceremony at an evangelical church in Fort Worth.

### Opponents

Shortly before the election, a Presbyterian minister in Austin, Tom Hegar, argued that "a liberal activist judge" might interpret the wording of Subsection (b) to outlaw marriage itself and said, "Don't risk it; vote against it."
Attorney General Greg Abbott, however, defended the language of the amendment. Proponents claimed that criticism of the amendment's language was a "smokescreen" to confuse voters on the issue.

## Pre-decision opinion polls

Many predicted Proposition 2 would pass, including opponents of Proposition 2. Supporters of Proposition 2, however, believed Texans might not vote because they will be overconfident after seeing landslide victories for marriage bans in other states.
* A 2003 poll showed that 63% of Texans surveyed said they support a state prohibition on same-sex marriages.
* An August 2005 Houston poll found that 64% of African Americans in Texas supported protection in the workplace for LGBT people. However, that same poll found 62% opposed same-sex couples being allowed to marry.

## Results

Proposition 2, "Definition of Marriage Act" :
| Choice | Votes | % |
| Yes | 1,723,782 | 76.25 |
| No | 536,913 | 23.74 |
| Total votes | 2,260,695 | 100.00 |
| Registered voters/turnout | 12,577,545 | 17.97 |
Proposition 2 passed by a vote of more than three to one. With around 17.97% voter turnout, this was the highest participation in a constitutional amendment election since 1991, boasted by the same-sex marriage ban. Matt Foreman, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, said the outcome was not unexpected: "When you put a fundamental right of a minority up for popular vote, it's almost impossible to win."

### County breakdown

Of Texas's 254 counties, 253 of the 254 voted in favor of Proposition 2. Travis County, which includes Austin, was the only county to oppose the amendment, with slightly under 60% of voters opposing it. Houston and Dallas, the 6th and 8th cities with the largest LGBT populations in the US, voted for Proposition 2. The largest county in Texas, Harris, voted 72.5 percent to 27.5 percent for Proposition 2, with 17.5 percent voter turn out; however, two Montrose-area precincts of the county with substantial LGBT populations reported turnouts of around 35 percent. King County, the most Republican county in Texas, had the highest voter turnout of any county, with 54.16 percent, while Starr County, the most Democratic county in Texas, had the lowest voter turnout of any county, with 3.05 percent.
Of the counties containing the ten largest Texas cities, Houston, San Antonio, Dallas, Austin, Fort Worth, El Paso, Arlington, Corpus Christi, Plano, and Laredo, only Austin voted against Proposition 2. Of the counties containing the ten largest Texas universities, Texas A&M University, the University of Texas at Austin, the University of Houston, the University of North Texas, Texas State University–San Marcos, the University of Texas at Arlington, Texas Tech University, the University of Texas at San Antonio, the University of Texas at El Paso, and the University of Texas at Dallas, only the University of Texas at Austin voted against Proposition 2. Glen Maxey, the first openly gay member of the Texas House of Representatives, visited the University of Texas campus after the polls closed, where he said students voted more than 4-to-1 against the amendment. Students at the University of Houston, University of North Texas, and Texas State University voted 2-to-1 against the amendment. However students at Texas A&M University and Baylor University voted 6-to-1 in favor of the amendment.
Breakdown of voting by county :
| County | Yes | Votes | No | Votes | Voter turnout |
| Floyd | 95.4% | 1,134 | 4.6% | 55 | 27.12% |
| Martin | 95.4% | 644 | 4.6% | 31 | 23.45% |
| Ochiltree | 95.1% | 1,372 | 4.9% | 71 | 29.34% |
| Parmer | 95.1% | 1,141 | 4.9% | 59 | 24.47% |
| Hansford | 95.1% | 904 | 4.9% | 47 | 29.70% |
| Childress | 94.6% | 902 | 5.4% | 51 | 25.52% |
| Motley | 94.5% | 327 | 5.5% | 19 | 38.06% |
| Hartley | 94.3% | 810 | 5.7% | 49 | 29.97% |
| Dallam | 94.3% | 615 | 5.7% | 37 | 20.31% |
| Lipscomb | 94.1% | 602 | 6.9% | 38 | 33.49% |
| Wheeler | 93.9% | 1,057 | 7.1% | 69 | 29.18% |
| Gaines | 93.8% | 1,663 | 6.2% | 109 | 25.43% |
| Briscoe | 93.8% | 471 | 7.2% | 31 | 39.93% |
| Hardin | 93.7% | 5,121 | 6.3% | 342 | 16.60% |
| Panola | 93.6% | 3,429 | 6.4% | 234 | 23.60% |
| Cass | 93.5% | 4,488 | 6.5% | 343 | 26.41% |
| Jasper | 93.5% | 3,690 | 6.5% | 258 | 19.12% |
| Newton | 93.5% | 1,552 | 6.5% | 108 | 17.95% |
| Collingsworth | 93.5% | 563 | 6.5% | 39 | 26.01% |
| Yoakum | 93.4% | 919 | 6.6% | 65 | 22.91% |
| Lynn | 93.3% | 758 | 6.7% | 54 | 19.66% |
| Hutchinson | 93.2% | 3,714 | 6.8% | 272 | 24.92% |
| Moore | 93.2% | 2,271 | 6.8% | 166 | 25.22% |
| Deaf Smith | 93.2% | 1,664 | 6.8% | 121 | 18.64% |
| Sherman | 93.2% | 449 | 6.8% | 33 | 34.35% |
| King | 93.2% | 109 | 6.8% | 8 | 54.16% |
| Armstrong | 93.1% | 462 | 6.9% | 32 | 33.11% |
| Stonewall | 92.9% | 340 | 7.1% | 26 | 30.75% |
| Shelby | 92.8% | 2,942 | 7.2% | 229 | 21.85% |
| Tyler | 92.8% | 2,332 | 7.2% | 181 | 18.72% |
| Callahan | 92.8% | 1,782 | 7.2% | 138 | 21.46% |
| Shackelford | 92.8% | 506 | 7.2% | 39 | 21.86% |
| Red River | 92.6% | 1,520 | 7.4% | 122 | 20.04% |
| Oldham | 92.6% | 375 | 7.4% | 30 | 28.06% |
| Scurry | 92.5% | 1,955 | 7.5% | 159 | 19.64% |
| Roberts | 92.5% | 236 | 7.5% | 19 | 36.63% |
| Rusk | 92.4% | 6,269 | 7.6% | 519 | 22.35% |
| Baylor | 92.4% | 580 | 7.6% | 48 | 22.21% |
| Orange | 92.3% | 5,699 | 7.7% | 476 | 11.80% |
| Hale | 92.3% | 3,568 | 7.7% | 299 | 18.90% |
| Eastland | 92.3% | 2,386 | 7.7% | 199 | 25.19% |
| Lavaca | 92.2% | 2,527 | 7.8% | 215 | 19.93% |
| Terry | 92.2% | 1,381 | 7.8% | 117 | 20.02% |
| Ward | 92.2% | 1,282 | 7.8% | 109 | 21.69% |
| Carson | 92.2% | 1,278 | 7.8% | 108 | 29.61% |
| Brown | 92.1% | 5,413 | 7.9% | 466 | 24.27% |
| Bailey | 92.1% | 812 | 7.9% | 70 | 21.25% |
| Knox | 92.1% | 563 | 7.9% | 48 | 24.15% |
| Andrews | 92.0% | 1,617 | 8.0% | 140 | 21.89% |
| Coleman | 92.0% | 1,224 | 8.0% | 107 | 21.23% |
| San Saba | 92.0% | 977 | 8.0% | 85 | 29.13% |
| Haskell | 92.0% | 913 | 8.0% | 79 | 24.42% |
| Hockley | 91.9% | 2,663 | 8.1% | 235 | 21.15% |
| Archer | 91.9% | 1,522 | 8.1% | 134 | 26.00% |
| Madison | 91.9% | 1,314 | 8.1% | 113 | 21.11% |
| Sterling | 91.9% | 193 | 8.1% | 17 | 24.41% |
| Swisher | 91.8% | 991 | 8.2% | 89 | 23.64% |
| Lamar | 91.7% | 6,134 | 8.3% | 554 | 23.02% |
| Dawson | 91.7% | 1,482 | 8.3% | 135 | 19.12% |
| Hemphill | 91.7% | 593 | 8.3% | 54 | 28.59% |
| Sutton | 91.7% | 409 | 8.3% | 37 | 17.26% |
| Van Verde | 91.6% | 7,189 | 8.4% | 663 | 24.88% |
| Upshur | 91.6% | 5,194 | 8.4% | 477 | 23.85% |
| Clay | 91.6% | 1,942 | 8.4% | 177 | 27.65% |
| Hall | 91.6% | 490 | 8.4% | 45 | 24.28% |
| Bowie | 91.5% | 8,651 | 8.5% | 800 | 17.04% |
| Gary | 91.5% | 4,099 | 8.5% | 379 | 30.75% |
| Live Oak | 91.5% | 1,033 | 8.5% | 96 | 15.25% |
| Kimble | 91.5% | 668 | 8.5% | 62 | 25.68% |
| Liberty | 91.4% | 5,477 | 8.6% | 517 | 13.63% |
| Houston | 91.3% | 2,717 | 8.7% | 258 | 19.77% |
| Mills | 91.3% | 805 | 8.7% | 77 | 26.97% |
| Cottle | 91.3% | 230 | 8.7% | 22 | 19.00% |
| Jack | 91.2% | 1,075 | 8.8% | 104 | 24.10% |
| Castro | 91.2% | 938 | 8.8% | 91 | 22.59% |
| Mitchell | 91.2% | 834 | 8.8% | 80 | 17.61% |
| Morris | 91.1% | 1,755 | 8.9% | 172 | 22.12% |
| Crane | 91.1% | 501 | 8.9% | 49 | 21.91% |
| Harrison | 91.0% | 6,717 | 9.0% | 662 | 17.68% |
| Wood | 91.0% | 6,231 | 9.0% | 620 | 28.66% |
| Rains | 91.0% | 1,421 | 9.0% | 141 | 24.44% |
| Donely | 91.0% | 689 | 9.0% | 68 | 29.43% |
| Coke | 91.0% | 506 | 9.0% | 50 | 22.32% |
| Hopkins | 90.9% | 3,947 | 9.1% | 397 | 21.11% |
| Leon | 90.9% | 2,318 | 9.1% | 233 | 22.99% |
| Cherokee | 90.8% | 5,329 | 9.2% | 541 | 20.99% |
| Stephens | 90.8% | 193 | 9.2% | 17 | 21.18% |
| Titus | 90.7% | 2,919 | 9.3% | 298 | 21.34% |
| Hardeman | 90.7% | 545 | 9.3% | 56 | 20.29% |
| Cochran | 90.7% | 441 | 9.3% | 45 | 24.27% |
| Upton | 90.7% | 388 | 9.3% | 40 | 21.24% |
| Anderson | 90.6% | 6,137 | 9.4% | 640 | 23.92% |
| Montague | 90.6% | 2,655 | 9.4% | 274 | 22.83% |
| Jackson | 90.6% | 1,946 | 9.4% | 203 | 23.05% |
| Jones | 90.6% | 1,927 | 9.4% | 201 | 20.87% |
| Concho | 90.6% | 367 | 9.4% | 38 | 21.64% |
| Delta | 90.5% | 766 | 9.5% | 80 | 24.93% |
| Borden | 90.5% | 162 | 9.5% | 17 | 39.51% |
| Freestone | 90.4% | 2,365 | 9.6% | 251 | 23.31% |
| McCulloch | 90.4% | 1,088 | 9.6% | 115 | 22.33% |
| Winkler | 90.3% | 805 | 9.7% | 86 | 23.27% |
| Howard | 90.2% | 2,946 | 9.8% | 320 | 18.60% |
| Gregg | 89.9% | 13,213 | 10.1% | 1,946 | 19.97% |
| Angelina | 89.9% | 8,210 | 10.1% | 918 | 20.00% |
| Runnels | 89.9% | 1,319 | 10.1% | 148 | 21.35% |
| Midland | 89.8% | 13,364 | 10.2% | 1,515 | 20.99% |
| Cooke | 89.8% | 5,632 | 10.2% | 640 | 26.59% |
| Wharton | 89.8% | 4,412 | 10.2% | 503 | 20.04% |
| Camp | 89.8% | 1,414 | 10.2% | 161 | 21.70% |
| Throckmorton | 89.8% | 440 | 10.2% | 50 | 39.70% |
| Smith | 89.7% | 22,357 | 10.3% | 2,559 | 21.63% |
| Navarro | 89.7% | 5,276 | 10.3% | 604 | 21.46% |
| Franklin | 89.7% | 1,468 | 10.3% | 169 | 26.09% |
| Trinity | 89.5% | 1,673 | 10.5% | 197 | 16.95% |
| Karnes | 89.5% | 1,099 | 10.5% | 129 | 14.89% |
| Schleicher | 89.5% | 377 | 10.5% | 44 | 22.75% |
| Lamb | 89.4% | 2,360 | 10.6% | 279 | 28.29% |
| Young | 89.3% | 3,228 | 10.7% | 387 | 32.49% |
| San Jacinto | 89.3% | 2,624 | 10.7% | 316 | 18.95% |
| Comanche | 89.3% | 1,845 | 10.7% | 220 | 22.64% |
| Edwards | 89.3% | 299 | 10.7% | 36 | 22.36% |
| Bee | 89.1% | 1,732 | 10.9% | 212 | 12.25% |
| Regan | 89.1% | 353 | 10.9% | 43 | 21.07% |
| Jim Hogg | 89.1% | 180 | 10.9% | 22 | 5.36% |
| Randall | 89.0% | 17,202 | 11.0% | 2,130 | 26.14% |
| Chambers | 89.0% | 3,149 | 11.0% | 390 | 17.43% |
| Kaufman | 88.9% | 7,535 | 11.1% | 939 | 16.53% |
| Fannin | 88.9% | 3,775 | 11.1% | 469 | 22.37% |
| Colorado | 88.9% | 2,302 | 11.1% | 287 | 19.91% |
| Sabine | 88.9% | 1,372 | 11.1% | 172 | 21.79% |
| DeWitt | 88.8% | 2,281 | 11.2% | 288 | 21.60% |
| Fisher | 88.8% | 659 | 11.2% | 83 | 26.04% |
| Glasscock | 88.8% | 223 | 11.2% | 28 | 34.95% |
| Ellis County | 88.7% | 13,632 | 11.3% | 1,730 | 20.00% |
| Jim Wells | 88.7% | 1,677 | 11.3% | 214 | 7.31% |
| Wise | 88.6% | 5,896 | 11.4% | 762 | 20.21% |
| Somervell | 88.6% | 1,158 | 11.4% | 149 | 23.59% |
| Crosby | 88.4% | 1,107 | 11.6% | 145 | 29.25% |
| Ector County | 88.3% | 10,465 | 11.7% | 1,382 | 17.66% |
| Hill | 88.2% | 3,911 | 11.8% | 523 | 20.36% |
| Nolan | 88.2% | 1,859 | 11.8% | 249 | 22.70% |
| Pecos | 88.2% | 983 | 11.8% | 132 | 14.47% |
| Johnson | 88.1% | 13,920 | 11.9% | 1,879 | 20.68% |
| Limestone | 88.1% | 2,294 | 11.9% | 311 | 18.75% |
| Austin | 88.0% | 3,401 | 12.0% | 462 | 22.89% |
| Burleson | 87.9% | 1,815 | 12.1% | 249 | 19.05% |
| Goliad | 87.9% | 718 | 12.1% | 99 | 15.11% |
| Crockett | 87.9% | 392 | 12.1% | 54 | 16.13% |
| Henderson | 87.8% | 9,310 | 12.2% | 1,293 | 21.69% |
| Parker | 87.7% | 11,905 | 12.3% | 1,669 | 21.00% |
| Polk | 87.7% | 4,367 | 12.3% | 612 | 13.71% |
| Hudspeth | 87.7% | 206 | 12.3% | 29 | 14.90% |
| Lee | 87.6% | 2,001 | 12.4% | 284 | 25.43% |
| Reeves | 87.6% | 567 | 12.4% | 80 | 9.26% |
| Grayson | 87.5% | 13,641 | 12.5% | 1,946 | 21.53% |
| Matagorda | 87.5% | 3,957 | 12.5% | 566 | 21.80% |
| Fayette | 87.5% | 3,504 | 12.5% | 502 | 26.97% |
| Frio | 87.5% | 752 | 12.5% | 107 | 8.86% |
| Wilson | 87.3% | 3,275 | 12.7% | 478 | 15.95% |
| Medina | 87.3% | 3,121 | 12.7% | 453 | 14.72% |
| Falls | 87.3% | 1,595 | 12.7% | 231 | 19.29% |
| San Augustine | 87.3% | 897 | 12.7% | 130 | 15.10% |
| Dickens | 87.3% | 672 | 12.7% | 98 | 51.56% |
| Wichita | 87.2% | 13,373 | 12.8% | 1,967 | 20.12% |
| Taylor | 87.2% | 12,138 | 12.8% | 1,787 | 17.85% |
| Gonzales | 87.2% | 1,703 | 12.8% | 249 | 16.52% |
| Hamilton | 87.1% | 1,186 | 12.9% | 176 | 25.05% |
| Calhoun | 87.0% | 1,872 | 13.0% | 279 | 16.99% |
| Hunt | 86.9% | 8,490 | 13.1% | 1,279 | 20.21% |
| Wilbarger | 86.9% | 3,207 | 13.1% | 484 | 43.59% |
| Robertson | 86.9% | 1,772 | 13.1% | 266 | 17.69% |
| Uvalde | 86.8% | 2,290 | 13.2% | 347 | 16.49% |
| Refugio | 86.7% | 740 | 13.3% | 114 | 15.50% |
| Coryell | 86.5% | 3,691 | 13.5% | 575 | 11.77% |
| Real | 86.5% | 637 | 13.5% | 99 | 30.15% |
| Kent | 86.5% | 173 | 13.5% | 27 | 27.73% |
| Montgomery | 86.4% | 31,600 | 13.6% | 4,956 | 17.12% |
| Earth | 86.4% | 3,766 | 13.6% | 592 | 22.44% |
| Washington | 86.4% | 3,722 | 13.6% | 585 | 21.26% |
| Jefferson | 86.3% | 12,631 | 13.7% | 2,003 | 9.36% |
| Victoria County | 86.3% | 9,148 | 13.7% | 1,449 | 20.07% |
| Palo Pinto | 86.0% | 2,663 | 14.0% | 435 | 18.46% |
| Marion | 85.9% | 1,046 | 14.1% | 171 | 15.73% |
| Hood | 85.8% | 6,675 | 14.2% | 1,104 | 24.45% |
| Bosque | 85.8% | 2,166 | 14.2% | 359 | 21.44% |
| McMullen | 85.8% | 145 | 14.2% | 24 | 24.42% |
| Lampasas | 85.5% | 2,159 | 14.5% | 366 | 21.54% |
| Waller | 85.3% | 3,330 | 14.7% | 573 | 15.59% |
| San Patricio | 84.9% | 3,525 | 15.1% | 628 | 8.77% |
| Atascosa | 84.7% | 2,565 | 15.3% | 463 | 12.50% |
| Irion | 84.7% | 272 | 15.3% | 49 | 25.94% |
| Potter | 84.5% | 8,309 | 15.5% | 1,523 | 17.70% |
| Kerr | 84.4% | 6,518 | 15.6% | 1,205 | 23.96% |
| Terrell | 84.3% | 145 | 15.7% | 27 | 22.78% |
| Kinney | 84.2% | 416 | 15.8% | 78 | 21.06% |
| Grimes | 84.1% | 2,423 | 15.9% | 459 | 22.28% |
| Nacogdoches | 83.4% | 5,634 | 16.6% | 1,118 | 21.59% |
| Walker | 85.3% | 5,012 | 16.6% | 998 | 21.39% |
| Val Verde | 83.4% | 2,290 | 16.6% | 347 | 10.73% |
| Bell | 83.1% | 16,891 | 16.9% | 3,437 | 14.06% |
| Gillespie | 82.9% | 4,132 | 17.1% | 852 | 30.89% |
| Menard | 82.9% | 266 | 17.1% | 55 | 17.69% |
| Rockwall | 82.8% | 8,349 | 17.2% | 1,738 | 26.51% |
| Brazoria | 82.7% | 27,582 | 17.3% | 5,789 | 21.36% |
| Willacy | 82.7% | 671 | 17.3% | 140 | 7.38% |
| Fort Bend | 82.6% | 35,695 | 17.4% | 7,542 | 17.07% |
| Lubbock | 82.6% | 25,594 | 17.4% | 5,380 | 20.12% |
| Tom Green | 82.6% | 11,418 | 17.4% | 2,400 | 21.94% |
| La Salle | 82.6% | 303 | 17.4% | 64 | 8.52% |
| Mason | 82.5% | 692 | 17.5% | 147 | 29.18% |
| Llano | 82.2% | 3,722 | 27.8% | 806 | 33.52% |
| Zapata | 82.2% | 444 | 17.8% | 96 | 7.92% |
| Milam | 82.0% | 2,767 | 18.0% | 606 | 23.69% |
| Culberson | 82.0% | 132 | 18% | 29 | 8.85% |
| Hidalgo | 81.9% | 15,497 | 18.1% | 3,436 | 7.49% |
| Foard | 81.9% | 154 | 18.1% | 34 | 19.20% |
| Burnet | 81.5% | 5,277 | 18.5% | 1,195 | 25.81% |
| Kendall | 81.4% | 4,044 | 18.6% | 923 | 23.91% |
| Bandera | 81.3% | 2,485 | 18.7% | 573 | 22.45% |
| Comal | 81.1% | 10,826 | 18.9% | 2,515 | 20.47% |
| Starr | 81.0% | 665 | 19.0% | 156 | 3.05% |
| McLennan | 80.9% | 18,819 | 19.1% | 4,445 | 17.90% |
| Guadalupe | 80.7% | 9,844 | 19.3% | 2,358 | 18.95% |
| Kleberg | 80.6% | 1,364 | 19.4% | 329 | 9.32% |
| Zavala | 80.6% | 408 | 19.4% | 98 | 6.58% |
| Dimmit | 80.3% | 435 | 19.7% | 107 | 7.20% |
| Brooks | 79.3% | 352 | 20.7% | 92 | 7.21% |
| Duval | 77.8% | 833 | 22.2% | 238 | 11.22% |
| Maverick | 77.7% | 665 | 22.3% | 191 | 3.42% |
| Tarrant | 76.8% | 128,456 | 23.2% | 38,831 | 18.97% |
| Texas | 76.25% | 1,723,782 | 23.74% | 536,913 | 17.97% |
| Aransas | 76.0% | 2,117 | 24.0% | 668 | 17.89% |
| Webb | 75.9% | 4,619 | 24.1% | 1,463 | 6.30% |
| Jeff Davis | 75.8% | 294 | 24.2% | 94 | 22.82% |
| Caldwell | 75.6% | 2,676 | 24.4% | 862 | 16.85% |
| Kenedy | 75.4% | 46 | 24.6% | 15 | 19.00% |
| Blanco | 75.2% | 1,387 | 24.8% | 458 | 28.60% |
| Denton | 75.1% | 39,650 | 24.9% | 13,166 | 16.89% |
| Nueces | 74.7% | 17,375 | 25.3% | 5,888 | 12.19% |
| Galveston | 74.6% | 18,331 | 25.4% | 6,241 | 13.56% |
| Collin | 74.5% | 44,765 | 25.5% | 15,359 | 16.60% |
| Brazos | 73.4% | 12,618 | 26.6% | 4,571 | 20.28% |
| Harris | 72.5% | 236,071 | 27.5% | 89,652 | 17.50% |
| Cameron | 72.4% | 11,831 | 27.6% | 4,501 | 10.21% |
| Loving | 71.4% | 20 | 28.6% | 8 | 25.45% |
| Bastrop | 71.1% | 5,974 | 28.9% | 2,432 | 22.57% |
| Williamson | 69.9% | 33,677 | 30.1% | 14,508 | 24.58% |
| Bexar | 69.2% | 100,308 | 30.8% | 44,578 | 16.67% |
| El Paso | 68.1% | 19,870 | 31.9% | 9,313 | 8.02% |
| Presidio | 67.2% | 195 | 32.8% | 95 | 5.30% |
| Dallas | 66.5% | 144,559 | 33.5% | 72,973 | 18.79% |
| Brewster | 64.4% | 774 | 35.6% | 427 | 20.16% |
| Hays | 58.1% | 9,253 | 41.9% | 6,665 | 20.25% |
| Travis | 40.1% | 54,246 | 59.9% | 81,170 | 25.18% |

## Effects

The amendment, which took effect on November 23, 2005, constitutionally banned same-sex marriages, which were never recognized by the state and was statutorily banned since 1973, and civil unions or civil union equivalents, which were never recognized by the state and was statutorily banned since 2003. Texas became the 18th US state to ban same-sex marriage in its constitution and 12th US state to ban civil unions or civil union equivalents in its constitution. This preempted the state judiciary from requiring the state to legally recognize same-sex marriages or civil unions or civil union equivalents and preempted the Texas Legislature from enacting a statute legalizing same-sex marriages or civil unions or civil union equivalents. Domestic partnerships in Texas, legal in 1 county and 2 municipalities at the time, were unaffected by the amendment.
In November 2009, Barbara Ann Radnofsky, a candidate for Texas Attorney General, claimed that the amendment, because it was poorly drafted, outlawed all marriage in Texas.
The Williams Institute projected that legalizing same-sex marriage in Texas would add $182.5 million to the state's economy in the first three years.

## Legal challenge

On October 1, 2009, a state district court judge in the case of In Re Marriage of J.B. and H.B. ruled the amendment unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The lawsuit was filed by two men living in Dallas who had married in Massachusetts in 2006. They were seeking a divorce in Texas because Massachusetts permits only state residents to sue for divorce. Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott and Governor Rick Perry appealed to the Fifth Court of Appeals in Dallas. On August 31, 2010, the appellate court reversed the district court, ruling that the amendment does not violate the U.S. Constitution and that district courts in Texas do not have subject-matter jurisdiction to hear a same-sex divorce case.